Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America  

Editor ALFREDO G. TORRES

eBooks End User License Agreement Please read this license agreement carefully before using this eBook. Your use of this eBook/chapter constitutes your agreement to the terms and conditions set forth in this License Agreement. Bentham Science Publishers agrees to grant the user of this eBook/chapter, a non-exclusive, nontransferable license to download and use this eBook/chapter under the following terms and conditions: 1. This eBook/chapter may be downloaded and used by one user on one computer. The user may make one back-up copy of this publication to avoid losing it. The user may not give copies of this publication to others, or make it available for others to copy or download. For a multi-user license contact [email protected] 2. All rights reserved: All content in this publication is copyrighted and Bentham Science Publishers own the copyright. You may not copy, reproduce, modify, remove, delete, augment, add to, publish, transmit, sell, resell, create derivative works from, or in any way exploit any of this publication’s content, in any form by any means, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission from Bentham Science Publishers. 3. The user may print one or more copies/pages of this eBook/chapter for their personal use. The user may not print pages from this eBook/chapter or the entire printed eBook/chapter for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific permission must be obtained from the publisher for such requirements. Requests must be sent to the permissions department at E-mail: [email protected] 4. The unauthorized use or distribution of copyrighted or other proprietary content is illegal and could subject the purchaser to substantial money damages. The purchaser will be liable for any damage resulting from misuse of this publication or any violation of this License Agreement, including any infringement of copyrights or proprietary rights. Warranty Disclaimer: The publisher does not guarantee that the information in this publication is error-free, or warrants that it will meet the users’ requirements or that the operation of the publication will be uninterrupted or error-free. This publication is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either express or implied or statutory, including, without limitation, implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. The entire risk as to the results and performance of this publication is assumed by the user. In no event will the publisher be liable for any damages, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages and damages for lost data or profits arising out of the use or inability to use the publication. The entire liability of the publisher shall be limited to the amount actually paid by the user for the eBook or eBook license agreement. Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances shall Bentham Science Publishers, its staff, editors and authors, be liable for any special or consequential damages that result from the use of, or the inability to use, the materials in this site. eBook Product Disclaimer: No responsibility is assumed by Bentham Science Publishers, its staff or members of the editorial board for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products instruction, advertisements or ideas contained in the publication purchased or read by the user(s). Any dispute will be governed exclusively by the laws of the U.A.E. and will be settled exclusively by the competent Court at the city of Dubai, U.A.E. You (the user) acknowledge that you have read this Agreement, and agree to be bound by its terms and conditions. Permission for Use of Material and Reproduction Photocopying Information for Users Outside the USA: Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. grants authorization for individuals to photocopy copyright material for private research use, on the sole basis that requests for such use are referred directly to the requestor's local Reproduction Rights Organization (RRO). The copyright fee is US $25.00 per copy per article exclusive of any charge or fee levied. In order to contact your local RRO, please contact the International Federation of Reproduction Rights Organisations (IFRRO), Rue du Prince Royal 87, B-I050 Brussels, Belgium; Tel: +32 2 551 08 99; Fax: +32 2 551 08 95; E-mail: [email protected]; url: www.ifrro.org This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. Photocopying Information for Users in the USA: Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. for libraries and other users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) Transactional Reporting Services, provided that the appropriate fee of US $25.00 per copy per chapter is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers MA 01923, USA. Refer also to www.copyright.com

CONTENTS Foreword

i

Preface

ii

Contributors

iv

CHAPTERS 1. Overview of Escherichia coli A.G. Torres, M. Arenas-Hernandez and Y. Martinez-Laguna

1

2. Evolution and Epidemiology of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli N. Williams, A.G. Torres and S. Lloyd

8

3. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) T.A.T. Gomes and B. Gonzalez-Pedrajo

25

4. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli F. Navarro-Garcia, W.P. Elias, J. Flores and P.C. Okhuysen

48

5. Shiga Toxin Producing Escherichia coli B. Guth, Valeria Prado and M. Rivas

65

6. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli J. Flores and P.C. Okhuysen

84

7. Detection and Subtyping Methods of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli Strains R.M.F. Piazza, C.M. Abe, D.S.P.Q. Horton, E. Miliwebsky, I. Chinen, T.M.I. Vaz and K. Irino

95

8. Clinical Management of Escherichia Coli Cases (The Latin America Experience) H.A. Repetto

116

9. Host Responses to Pathogenic Escherichia coli C. Ibarra and M. Palermo

122

10. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in Argentina M. Rivas, N.L. Padola, P.M.A. Lucchesi and M. Masana

142

11. Escherichia coli Situation in Brazil B.E.C. Guth, C.F. Picheth and T.A.T. Gomes

162

12. Shiga Toxin Producing Escherichia coli in Chile R.M. Vidal, A. Oñate, JC. Salazar and V. Prado

179

13. Epidemiology of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli Pathotypes in Mexico, Past and Present A. Navarro and T. Estrada-Garcia

191

14. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in Children from Uruguay, Colombia and Peru G. Varela, O. Gomez-Duarte and T. Ochoa

209

15. Escherichia coli Animal Reservoirs, Transmission Route and Animal Disease A.F. Pestana DE Castro, A. Bentancor, E.C. Mercado, A. Cataldi and A.E. Parma

223

16. Host-Pathogen Communication M.P. Sircili, C.G. Moreira and V. Sperandio

249

17. Future of Escherichia coli Research in Latin America T.A.T. Gomes, C. Ibarra, F. Navarro-Garcia, M. Palermo, V. Prado, M. Rivas and A.G. Torres

256

Index

262

i

FOREWORD In November 1946, Gerardo Varela, the most prominent Mexican bacteriologist of his time, published a paper in the bulletin of the Children’s Hospital in Mexico City [1] describing the identification of a “new” type of Escherichia coli isolated from a child who had died from a severe diarrhea in the same hospital. His collaborators were Alejandro Aguirre, a young pediatrician, and Julio Carrillo, who had personally performed the microbiological studies during the autopsy and who had isolated the bacteria and kept it for further studies. A few months earlier, Bray had published similar results from a group of children in the Great Britain who were dying from diarrhea in a town in England [2]. Considering that the Second World War had just ended, there was no communication between these two groups at the time. However, once published, a heated discussion began on both sides of the Atlantic with most people reluctant to accept that a bacterium like E. coli, which until then had been considered as an organism that was not associated with disease, could be the cause of these children’s deaths. Although, both Bray and Varela were able to show that the serum obtained from the children infected with these putative pathogens were able to agglutinate the bacteria in vitro, Varela’s approach went a step further. One of his main interests was to study the cross reactions between different enteric organisms when tested against an antiserum raised in rabbits. For these particular assays, he primarily used antisera prepared against somatic and flagellar antigens of different types of Salmonella, which was the dominant pathogen of interest at the time. As reported in his publication [1], an antiserum prepared against the somatic antigen of Salmonella adelaide was able to agglutinate the E. coli isolated from the feces of the child who had died. A similar reaction was found with another E. coli isolated from a different child who had also died from severe diarrhea, and from a cook working in the kitchen of the hospital who had been sampled during a study to determine sources for such infections. The cross reaction tests allowed Varela and his colleagues to demonstrate that these E. coli, usually considered as a part of the normal intestinal flora, were somehow different from other E. coli found in feces from humans without diarrhea. These two seminal studies in the mid-40’s led to major discussions about the role of E. coli as a pathogen, while remaining the most modest inhabitant of the intestine of humans and animals. The discussions prompted a deluge of new research in laboratories around the world that in one form or another had found similar results. Over the next few years, groups in Britain, the United States, Brazil and Mexico sent strains of E. coli isolated from children with severe diarrhea to Copenhagen, where Fritz Kauffmann had set up a serological system in his laboratory to identify the somatic and flagellar antigens of these organisms. The most interesting finding that comes out of Kauffmann’s serological studies was that E. coli isolated in different parts of the world was restricted to a few somatic and flagellar antigen combinations, called serotypes. All of these initial studies provided the catalyst for a whole new field of research that over the past 60 years has allowed us to understand how bacteria interact with intestinal cells, and how they are able to cause diarrhea. Researchers, either born or working in Latin America, have contributed extensively and consistently to this field over the years. Under the dynamic leadership of Alfredo Torres, who has been able to convince and cajole his friends working all over Latin America to put into writing their most recent work, this unique and interesting volume follows the tradition started by Varela and others in the 1940’s and shows the developments made since those early days in the scientific and clinical study of E. coli. I am sure that this book will help us involving in teaching microbiology and infectious diseases, and I hope it will encourage new questions and better answers in a field that, in spite of improved knowledge and increased understanding, is still looking for the necessary tools to prevent young children from dying from diarrhea around the world.

Alejandro Cravioto, M.D. International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Dhaka, Bangladesh

ii

REFERENCES [1] [2]

Varela G, Aguirre A, Carrillo J. Escherichia coli-Gomez, nueva especie aislada de un caso mortal de diarrhea. Bol Med Hosp Inf Mex 1946; 54: 623-6. Bray J. Isolation of antigenically homogenous strains of Bact. coli neapolitanum from summer diarrhea of infants. J Pathol Bacteriol 1945; 57: 239-47.

iii

PREFACE In 2009, during a session at the 7th International symposium on Shiga Toxin (Verocytotoxin) – Producing Escherichia coli Infections in Buenos Aires, Argentina, I was sitting at the back of the auditorium and realized that a large proportion of the attendees were young Latin American students, postdoctoral fellows and investigators, and many of them were participating for the first time in an international meeting where the world experts in pathogenic E. coli research discussed the “state of the art” in the field. I also observed that many of them were current and former trainees of Latin American laboratories and institutions with a long tradition in E. coli research, and those laboratories have not only contributed to the understanding of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli infections, but played a pivotal role in the identification and characterization of other categories of pathogenic E. coli. At that moment, I realized that it was the to organize a group that helps promoting the research of the scientist in this region and as a first task to write a comprehensive text on pathogenic E. coli summarizing and reviewing the accumulated knowledge generated by these Latin American investigators, which had make a significant impact on our understanding of these important human pathogens. In the first 10 years of the 21st century, the different categories of pathogenic E. coli have been reviewed extensively in review articles and some books, representing the vast body of literature on this bacterium, making pathogenic E. coli the best reviewed organism in the field of bacterial pathogenesis and infectious diseases. Even though, thousands of investigators around the world have been studying different aspects of the pathogenic attributes of E. coli for more than 60 years, pathogenic E. coli remains an important cause of diarrhea and death in infants in developing countries. Intestinal infections caused by E. coli remain as an important health problem in all Latin American countries and there was a need to publish an overall review of all the studies conducted in this region that have shown, the appearance of serotypes not previously associated with disease and the evolution of some categories of E. coli, which have become the predominant pathogenic E. coli in some of these countries. This body of knowledge produces by these investigators needed a critical review that was comprehensive and integrate all the different countries and all the researchers. Why this book is different from other books which are already published on pathogenic E. coli? Most prior volumes concentrated on the basic and clinical research progress performed by laboratories in North America, Europe, Australia or Japan, and none of them covered the situation in Latin America. The book “Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America” is a unique, comprehensive analysis of the most common categories of E. coli associated with diarrheal illness in Latin America. The aim of the book is to allow leading investigators in this region to discuss molecular mechanisms of E. coli pathogenesis followed by chapters on diagnosis, clinical management, host immune responses, animal reservoirs and epidemiology. In addition, the authors discuss the current situation of E. coli in representative countries, including Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay. This ebook presents timely and vital information to understand the current work on pathogenic E. coli in Latin America and presents future research in this region. The book is divided into 17 parts. The first 2 parts introduce the foundations of E. coli and the evolution and epidemiology associated with this pathogen. Parts 3-6 review the 4 most important categories of intestinal pathogenic E. coli in Latin America. Parts 7-9 are an overview of the current knowledge regarding diagnosis, clinical management and host responses to E. coli. Part 10-14 present the current situation of E. coli infections in 7 Latin American countries. Part 15 discuss the animal reservoirs, transmission and animal disease. Part 16 introduce a relative new area of investigation regarding communication mechanisms between host and pathogen. Finally, part 17 is an assay by top investigators in the region discussing future directions of E. coli research in Latin America. I hope this book becomes a useful textbook for current and future generations of investigators and serves as a reference for the E. coli community to understand the past and present of research in Latin America.

Alfredo G. Torres, PhD Galveston, Texas

iv

CONTRIBUTORS Cecilia M. Abe

Laboratório de Bacteriologia, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Margarita M.P. Arenas-Hernandez

Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas. B. Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, México

Adriana Bentancor

Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Angel Cataldi

INTA-CONICET, Argentina

Isabel Chinen

Servicio Fisiopatogenia, Departamento de Bacteriología, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas “Carlos G. Malbrán”, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Alejandro Cravioto

ICDDR,B, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Waldir P. Elias

Laboratory of Bacteriology, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Teresa Estrada-Garcia

Department of Molecular Biomedicine, CINVESTAV-IPN, Mexico City, Mexico

Jose Flores

Division of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas at Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA

Tania A.T. Gomes

Departmento de Microbiologia, Imunologia, e Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Oscar G. Gómez-Duarte

International Enteric Vaccines Research Program, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Children’s Hospital, USA

Bertha Gonzalez-Pedrajo

Departamento de Genética Molecular, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F., Mexico

Beatriz E.C. Guth

Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Denise S.P.Q. Horton

Laboratório de Bacteriologia, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Cristina Ibarra

Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Kinue Irino

Seção de Bacteriologia, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Sonja J. Lloyd

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, U.S.A.

Paula M.A. Lucchesi

Laboratorio de Inmunoquímica y Biotecnología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Centro, 7000 Tandil, Prov. de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Ygnacio Martinez-Laguna

Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas. B. Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, México

Parasitologia,

Parasitology,

v

Marcelo Masana

Instituto Tecnología de Alimentos. Centro de Investigación de Agroindustria, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, INTA. B1708WAB Morón, Prov. de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Elsa C. Mercado

Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Argentina

Elizabeth Miliwebsky

Servicio Fisiopatogenia, Departamento de Bacteriología, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas “Carlos G. Malbrán”, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Cristiano G. Moreira

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Microbiology, Dallas, USA

Armando Navarro

Departamento de Salud Pública. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico. Mexico City, Mexico

Fernando Navarro-Garcia

Department of Cell Biology, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN (CINVESTAV-IPN), México DF, Mexico

Theresa Ochoa

Instituto de Medicina Tropical “Alexander von Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú

Pablo C. Okhuysen

Division of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas at Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA

Angel Oñate

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences. Universidad de Concepción. Chile

Nora Lía Padola

Laboratorio de Inmunoquímica y Biotecnología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Centro, Prov. de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Marina Palermo

Departamento de Inmunología, Academia Nacional de Medicina and ILEX-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Alberto E. Parma

Universidad Nacional del Centro-CICPBA, Argentina

Antonio F. Pestana de Castro

University of São Paulo, Brazil

Roxane M.F. Piazza

Laboratório de Bacteriologia, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Cyntia F. Picheth

Department of Medical Pathology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil

Valeria Prado

Microbiology Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile

Horacio A. Repetto

Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, and Hospital Nacional Prof. A Posadas, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Marta Rivas

Branch of Physiopathogenesis, Department of Bacteriology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas-ANLIS "Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán", Buenos Aires, Argentina

Humboldt”,

vi

Juan C. Salazar

Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine Universidad de Chile

Marcelo P. Sircili

Laboratório de Bacteriologia, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, SP, 05503900, Brazil

Vanessa Sperandio

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Microbiology, Dallas, TX 75390-9048, USA

Alfredo G. Torres

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Department of Pathology and the Sealy Center for Vaccine Development, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, U.S.A.

Gustavo Varela

Departamento de Bacteriología y Virología. Instituto de Higiene “Arnoldo Berta”. Facultad de Medicina. Universidad de la República. Montevideo, Uruguay

Tânia M.I. Vaz

Seção de Bacteriologia, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Roberto M. Vidal

Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine Universidad de Chile

Nina D. Williams

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, U.S.A.

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America, 2010, 1-7

1

CHAPTER 1 Overview of Escherichia coli Alfredo G Torres1,*, Margarita MP Arenas-Hernández2 and Ygnacio Martínez-Laguna2 1

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Department of Pathology and the Sealy Center for Vaccine Development, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-1070 and 2Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas. B. Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Puebla 72570 México. Abstract: Escherichia coli are Gram-negative bacteria found as normal commensal flora in the gastrointestinal tract. As a pathogen, E. coli are the most frequent causes of bacterial infections, including urinary tract infections, diarrheal disease, and other clinical infections such as neonatal meningitis, pneumonia and bacteremia. At least six different categories of pathogenic E. coli causing enteric infections have been identified and further characterized. In Latin America, as well as many other developing countries, diarrheal infections caused by E. coli remain an important cause de infant morbidity - mortality. Due to the appearance of the highly virulent strain of E. coli of serotype O157:H7 in the US and Canada in the 1980’s, and subsequently in other Latin American countries, there is an increase need for accurate testing for this and other pathogenic E. coli strains, substantially enhancing detection of virulent strains and, therefore, facilitating identification of sporadic E. coli infections and outbreaks.

ESCHERICHIA COLI: THE ORGANISM The genus Escherichia is named after the German pediatrician Theodor Escherich, who isolated the type species of the genus in 1885 [1]. E. coli are facultative anaerobic bacteria with a type of metabolism that is both fermentative and respiratory. They are either non-motile or motile by peritrichous flagella. E. coli strains are a major facultative inhabitant of the large intestine, widely distributed in the intestine of humans and warm-blooded animals and it is the predominant facultative anaerobe in the intestine and part of the essential microbiota that maintains the physiology of the healthy host [2]. E. coli is a member of the family Enterobacteriaceae [3], and although most strains of E. coli are not regarded as pathogens, they can be opportunistic pathogens that cause infections in immunocompromised hosts. Physiologically, E. coli is versatile and well-adapted to its characteristic habitats. It can grow in media with glucose as the sole organic constituent. Wild-type E. coli has no growth factor requirements, and metabolically it can transform glucose into all of the macromolecular components that make up the cell [4]. The bacterium can grow in the presence or absence of O2. Under anaerobic conditions it will grow by means of fermentation, producing mixed acids and gas as end products. However, it can also grow by means of anaerobic respiration, since it is able to utilize NO3, NO2 or fumarate as final electron acceptors for respiratory electron transport processes. In part, this versatility is what gives E. coli its ability to adapt to its intestinal (anaerobic) and its extraintestinal (aerobic or anaerobic) habitats [4]. E. coli is used as an indicator of fecal contamination because the organism is abundant in human and animal feces and not usually found in other niches. Furthermore, since E. coli could be easily detected by its ability to ferment glucose (later changed to lactose), it is easier to isolate from contaminated food or water than contain other known gastrointestinal pathogens. Due to the presence of other enteric bacteria like Citrobacter, Klebsiella and Enterobacter, which can also ferment lactose, the term "coliform" was coined. These enteric organisms are similar to E. coli in phenotypic characteristics and are not easily distinguished. Therefore, a broad definition indicates that the coliforms are a group of Gram-negative, facultative anaerobic rod-shaped bacteria that ferments lactose to produce acid and gas within 48 h at 35°C, and which are an indicator of contamination [5]. Further, the coliforms are well adapted to mammalian intestines, e.g. different strains of E. coli grows best in vivo or at the higher temperatures characteristic of such environment, rather than the cooler temperatures found in soil and other environments. Within the coliform group, the fecal coliforms consists mostly of E. coli (the indicator species), but some other enterics, such as Klebsiella, is also important indicator because they can also ferment lactose at temperatures between 44.5-45.5°C. *Address correspondence to: Alfredo G. Torres, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, Texas 77555-1070; Tel (409) 747-0189. E-mail: [email protected] Alfredo G. Torres (Ed) All rights reserved - © 2010 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

2 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Torres et al.

Detection and enumeration of coliforms is used as an indicator of sanitary quality of water or as a general indicator of sanitary condition in the food-processing environment [6]. Almost all the methods used to detect E. coli, total coliforms or fecal coliforms are enumeration methods that are based on lactose fermentation [7]. Colony-forming units and Most Probable Number (MPN) are two methods commonly used to assess the threat of pathogen contamination. For example, the MPN method is a statistical, multi-step assay consisting of presumptive, confirmed and completed phases. In the assay, serial dilutions of a sample are inoculated into broth media and the number of gas positive (fermentation of lactose) tubes is scored, from which the other 2 phases of the assay are performed using the combinations of positive results to consult statistical tables to estimate the number of organisms present. Typically only the first 2 phases are performed in coliform analysis, while all 3 phases are done for E. coli [8]. As a result of this type of analysis, fecal coliforms remain the standard indicator of choice for shellfish and shellfish harvest waters; and E. coli is used to indicate recent fecal contamination or unsanitary processing [5, 9]. One useful property of coliforms is that they are very easily differentiated from others by growing them in lactose– peptone–nutrient medium (e.g., Mac–Conkey broth) at 37°C for 24-48 h and then checking if they produced acid and gas. For further differentiation of fecal coliforms, the samples can be grown in lactose–peptone–eosin–methyl blue (EMB) agar medium. After incubating the medium at 37°C for 24-48 h, E. coli develops into blue black colonies with light reflecting metallic shine, whereas Enterobacter forms reddish slimy colonies. For E. coli O157:H7, the stool specimen are normally tested on sorbitol–MacConkey (SMAC) agar. To perform the complete differentiation of fecal contaminant (e.g., E. coli) and the non–fecal contaminant (e.g., Enterobacter), a series of traditional biochemical tests are still in use, which are collectively known as IMViC test [10]. In these tests, indol production from tryptophan (indol test), production of strong acid causing red color in methyl red indicator (methyl red test), production of acetoine (Voges–Proskauer test), and use of citrate as the only carbon source (citrate test) are conducted. E. coli shows positive reactions for the first two tests whereas Enterobacter aerogenes for the last two tests. Significance in Determining E. coli as a Contaminant of Food Products and Water As described above, coliforms are found in the soil, in water, in muck and all over the natural environment. However, E. coli strains are specifically adapted to live in the guts of warm blooded animals. E. coli is used for detection because it makes up about 10 percent of intestinal microorganisms of human and animals; consequently, there are a lot more coliforms in human feces than there are pathogens. Therefore, E. coli is considered a contaminant risk not only in water, but in food products as well, and in recent years there have been an increasing number of food recalls because of E. coli contamination [11, 12]. As a water contaminant, E. coli was chosen several years ago as an "indicator" of the amount of human fecal matter level in the water [13]. Comparing the number of coliform/E. coli with the standardized coliform index, the water quality can be graded and recommended for certain use or none. However, caution is recommended as it can be misleading to use E. coli alone as an indicator of human fecal contamination, because there are other environments in which E. coli grows well. Monitoring the levels of E. coli contamination is important because differences between non-pathogenic and pathogenic E. coli strains are often detectable only on the molecular level; however, many of these differences cause changes in the physiology or life cycle of the bacterium, leading for example to the different pathogenic lifestyles. New strains of E. coli arise all the time from the natural biological process of genetic variability (i.e. mutation, horizontal transfer genes), and some of those strains develop characteristics that can be harmful to their host animal. Although in most healthy adult individuals, such a strain would probably cause no more than a diarrheal episode or might produce no symptoms at all; in young children, people who are or have been recently immunocompromised, or in people taking certain medications, such virulent strain can cause serious illness and even death. A recent example of the evolution of a virulent strain is represented by E. coli O157:H7, which possess the stx-phages, which carry the genes encoding Shiga toxin (Stx). Shiga toxins have driven and are driving the emergence of Stx-producing pathogens and since the emergence of E. coli O157:H7 as a cause of significant human disease, more than 500 different serogroups of E. coli have been reported to produce Shiga toxin, as well as a few other organisms [14, 15]. ESCHERICHIA COLI AS A COMMENSAL Commensal intestinal microbiota (normal microbiota, indigenous microbiota) consists of those micro-organisms, which interact with epithelial cells and are exposed to the external environment [16]. The adult gastrointestinal tract

Overview of Escherichia coli

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 3

acquires at least 17 families of bacteria yielding 400 to 500 different microbial species with regional variation of bacterial composition within the gastrointestinal tract. In general, there is a qualitative and quantitative increase in complexity from the stomach to the colon with the colon as the primary site for commensal bacterial colonization in humans and animals. Commensal bacteria co-evolved with their hosts, however, under specific conditions they are able to overcome protective host responses and exert pathologic effects [17]. E. coli is part of the commensal flora and a normal inhabitant of the human gut, but is also the Gram-negative bacillus most frequently isolated in cases of human infection [18]. It has been postulated that commensal enteric E. coli may be the natural reservoir of pathogenic strains, because this normally harmless commensal needs only to acquire a combination of mobile genetic elements to become a highly adapted pathogen capable of causing a range of diseases, from gastroenteritis to extraintestinal infections of the urinary tract, bloodstream and central nervous system [19]. Indeed, intestinal or extraintestinal E. coli infections are caused by strains harboring numerous virulence factors located on plasmids, bacteriophages, transposons and pathogenicity islands [20]. The ubiquitous commensal population constitutes an enormous reservoir from which pathogenic strains continually emerge. The ability to E. coli to exist as a humanadapted commensal compounded with its natural tendency for frequent genetic exchange, its ubiquitous presence, and the enormous, diverse, and largely uncharacterized reservoir of genetic variation found within the species genomes, contribute to the emergence of new pathogenic strains and potentially resistant to antimicrobial drugs. Several studies have shown that pathogenic E. coli strains may be derived from commensal strains by the acquisition of chromosomal or extra-chromosomal virulence loci [21], “pathoadaptive mutations” which are genomic deletions that enhance pathogenicity [22]; or random point mutations that increase adaptation for pathogenic environments [23]. These strategies of genome plasticity for a commensal strain to become virulent has led to the hypothesis indicating that the fecal E. coli population may influence the occurrence and etiology of extraintestinal and intestinal infections because E. coli populations have a clonal structure [24]. Phylogenetic analyses have shown that E. coli strains fall into four main phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2, and D [25], and these classification are utilized to perform rapid and simple classification of pathogenic E. coli [26]. The assignment of E. coli clones to one of these four groups is the basis of phylogenetic studies of the species [27]. For example, it has been found that Shigella clones are derived from E. coli outside the phylogenetic groups B2 and A [28], while Shiga toxin-producing E. coli O157:H7 clones belong to phylogenetic group D [26]. In contrast, the clones responsible for human extraintestinal infections frequently belong to the anciently diverged B2 phylogenetic group [29]. Recent evidence indicates that commensal and pathogenic bacteria can also participate in the pathogenesis of the inflammatory bowel diseases [17]. Although there is no evidence that a single pathogen causes Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, it has been observed that increased numbers of mucosa-associated E. coli are observed in both major inflammatory bowel diseases. As a result, a new pathovar of E. coli, designated Adherent-Invasive E. coli (AIEC) has been found associated with ileal Crohn's disease. AIEC strains colonize the intestinal mucosa by adhering to intestinal epithelial cells, displaying the ability to invade them via a macropinocytosis-like process, and to survive and replicate intracellularly. Within macrophages, AIEC strains survive and replicate extensively without inducing host cell death and induce the release of high amounts of TNF [30]. All these virulence properties designate AIEC as a possible pathogen potentially able to induce persistent intestinal inflammation, further supporting the idea that commensal E. coli are a natural reservoir of pathogenic strains. ESCHERICHIA COLI AS AN ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE RESERVOIR IN THE MICROBIOME The human microbiome substantially impacts human health and plays beneficial roles in dietary processing and prevention of pathogen intrusion [31-33]. The widespread use of antibiotics in human medicine and agriculture has likely induced substantial responsive changes in this community. Many commensal bacterial species, which were once considered relatively harmless residents of the human microbiome, have recently emerged as multidrugresistant disease-causing organisms [34]. E. coli, as indicator bacteria, it is useful because this microorganism acquires antimicrobial resistance faster than other conventional bacteria. Thus, changes in the resistance of this species may serve as a good indicator of resistance in potentially pathogenic bacteria [35, 36]. Plasmids are genetic elements, not virulence factors per se, that can be transmitted between bacteria. Plasmids encode genes for a variety of factors that contribute to pathogenesis, including antibiotic resistance, fimbriae, toxins, secretion systems, and invasion factors. Transmission of plasmids plays a large role in the growing problem of antibiotic resistance [37]. An overview of the major

4 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Torres et al.

plasmid families that are currently emerging in multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated worldwide among those conferring resistance to clinically relevant antibiotics, such as extended-spectrum cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides has been recently published [38]. Acquisition of antibiotic resistance genes by non-pathogenic bacteria is detrimental for two reasons. First, these bacteria will constitute a reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes (and antibiotic resistance vectors) that may be transferred to virulent bacteria. Second, antibiotic-resistant bacteria can protect the susceptible ones (eventually pathogenic) from the action of antibiotics [39]. Conversely, acquisition and further spread of antibiotic resistance genes among pathogenic bacteria is a phenomenon that has occurred just in the last 50 years as a consequence of extensive antibiotic use for human therapy and animal farming. At first glance, pathogenicity and resistance should be unlinked phenomena. However, several examples indicate that this is not the situation for several bacterial pathogens. Antibiotic resistance and virulence genes can be linked (and then co-selected) in the same replicon, or eventually a single determinant can be involved in both virulence and resistance [39]. For example, the EHEC virulence plasmid pO26-CRL contains a complex antibiotic-resistance gene locus located between virulence determinants, such as the enterohemolysin operon (ehxCABD) and the STEC-specific extracellular serine protease (espP) [40]. This region encompasses a 22,609 bp Tn21 derivative encoding resistance to trimethoprim, streptomycin, sulfathiozole, kanamycin, neomycin, -lactams, and mercuric chloride. Plasmid pO26-CRL is nonconjugative but is mobilizable and raises the concern that antibiotic use could be co-selected with the virulence determinants, leading to increase disease potential in both commensal and pathogenic E. coli populations [40]. The widespread use of antimicrobial agents that are regarded as critically or highly important for use in humans creates a reservoir of resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes, which adds to the burden of antimicrobial resistance in human medicine and may shorten the time that these valuable antimicrobial agents will be available for effective treatment of human infections. Humans may obtain antimicrobial-resistant E. coli or antibiotic resistance genes of animal origin directly, via contact with animals, food of animal origin, or the environment. These bacteria may subsequently colonize humans or may transfer resistance genes to other bacteria during passage through the intestinal tract. Although the carriage of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli in the intestine is not a human health hazard itself, it might give rise to bacterial infections with limited therapeutic options and an increased risk of treatment failure. The contribution of the animal reservoir to the burden of antimicrobial resistance in humans has not been quantified; however, the use of antimicrobial agents considered as a critical or highly important for humans use should be avoided or minimized in food animals, to preserve the efficiency of these antimicrobial agents for treatment of infection in humans [41]. Evidence is accumulating to support the hypothesis that intestinal bacteria not only exchange resistance genes among themselves but might also interact with bacteria that are passing through the colon, causing these bacteria to acquire and transmit antibiotic resistance genes. By significantly expanding comparative genomics to a population scale, we will peer into the E. coli population, with previously unattainable resolution, and identify the genetic pathways leading to the emergence of human-adapted, pathogenic strains. ESCHERICHIA COLI AS AN ENTERIC PATHOGEN In the United States, for example, E. coli is the leading cause of both community-acquired and nosocomial Urinary Tract Infections (UTI). E. coli also causes 12-50% of nosocomial infections and 4% of cases of diarrheal disease. In tropical countries, in contrast, E. coli infections are one of leading causes of diarrhea, responsible in some situations for up to 40% of cases of infant or traveler's diarrhea. These infections are traditionally acquired after the consumption of contaminated meat obtained from a variety of animal species, other food products and water. Historically, serotyping was important in distinguishing the small number of strains that actually cause diarrheal disease. Some serotypes of these enteric organisms have been related to emergent zoonotic infections in developed and developing countries. Currently, with over 700 antigenic types (serotypes) of E. coli (which are recognized based on O, H, and K antigens) and with increasing number of serotypes associated with disease, the pathogenic E. coli are now also classified based on their unique virulence factors and adherence properties. Analysis for pathogenic E. coli usually requires that the isolate first be identified as E. coli by testing for metabolic characteristics and virulence markers before the serotype is determined. When an outbreak is suspected, it is necessary to differentiate the pathogenic E. coli isolates from commensal E. coli, because they are indistinguishable at the

Overview of Escherichia coli

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 5

biochemical level and, therefore, additional tests to those traditionally performed in the clinical laboratory are required to identify the specific isolate [42, 43]. For the diagnostic of pathogenic E. coli, some of the following methodologies are required: a) serotypification; b) adherent assays on HEp-2 cells; c) FAS test (Fluorescent Actin Staining); d) different molecular biology techniques to amplify genes encoding specific virulence factors [42-44]. One of the phenotypic diagnostic test is the adherence assay on HEp-2, which allows the identification of distinct pattern of bacterial adherence on the cells, namely, Localized, Localized Adherence-Like, Diffuse and Aggregative adherence [45, 46]. The second phenotypic assay is the FAS test, which is an alternative technique utilized in epidemiological studies and basic research [47]. In this assay, the accumulation of host cell cytoskeleton actin underneath the adherent bacteria is observed, and this accumulation is due in response to bacterial secreted factors. The FAS test can be utilized in: a) direct way on intestinal biopsies in patients with diarrhea and where is suspicion of a E. coli infection; b) with tissue cultured cells (HEp-2, HeLa, or Caco-2) infected with an E. coli strain isolated from infected feces [42, 47, 48]. The adherence assay and the FAS test are sufficient to identify some of the categories of E. coli listed in the subsequent chapters, however, additional molecular test to identify specific virulence factors are required to have a complete idea about the pathogenic capabilities of the strains. As a cause of enteric infections, different pathogenic mechanisms of 6 different categories of E. coli have been reported [14, 42]. Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) is a major cause of travelers’ diarrhea in adults from industrialized countries and children in developing countries worldwide. Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) is a cause of infant diarrhea in developing countries. Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), a food-borne pathogen of worldwide importance, can cause a non-bloody diarrhea but the most serious manifestation of disease is bloody diarrhea that can progress to a fatal illness due to acute kidney failure (hemolytic uremic syndrome [HUS]), particularly in children. Enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) were originally recognized as predominant etiologic agents of persistent diarrhea in developing countries and still remain an important cause of acute as well as protracted diarrhea in several parts of the world, including industrialized countries. Enteroinvasive E coli (EIEC) cause a watery diarrhea and dysentery in humans and, interestingly since EIEC are closely related to Shigella spp, the knowledge regarding EIEC virulence has been mainly extrapolated from the studies in Shigella. Finally, diffusely adhering E. coli (DAEC) strains are characterized by their diffuse adherence pattern on cultured epithelial cells, however, as compared with the other categories; little is known about the mechanism of DAEC pathogenesis. In the human intestine, ETEC, EPEC, EAEC colonize the small intestine, while EIEC and EHEC preferentially colonize the large bowel prior to causing diarrhea. Because of a large number of DAEC serotypes are associated with this category; the exact location for intestinal colonization of this pathogen has not been defined. ESCHERICHIA COLI: THE INTEND OF THIS BOOK In Latin America, acute gastroenteritis remains to be an important cause of morbidity in adults and a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children. A child under 5 years of age belonging to a low income segment of the Latin American population will develop 5 to 10 episodes of diarrhea every year [49]. Even with the impressive progress done to understand pathogenic mechanisms of enteric bacterial pathogens, at least one-third of all diarrheal cases in this region are still associated with the different categories of pathogenic E. coli. The rapid expansion of this field has been fueled by the continual emergence and re-emergence of new E. coli strains as a global public health problem; indeed, few infectious diseases have generated more sustained attention from the scientific and, notably, the lay media because the ability of some of the strains (e.g. E. coli O157:H7) to cause important outbreaks. The authors of this chapter believe that the field of pathogenic E. coli in Latin America was in great need of, the comprehensive review that this book represents. Although other books have been written about pathogenic E. coli, their focus generally has been the research progress in other parts of the world; this is the first volume, to our knowledge, with a nearly complete coverage of the pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnostic, therapeutics, animal reservoirs, mechanism of action, host-pathogen interactions, and other aspects associated with E. coli intestinal infections, with special emphasis to the situation in Latin America. This book combines and illuminates several years of tenacious study of pathogenic E. coli by multiple research groups in Latin America. The goal was to integrate the diverse aspects of the E. coli research performed in the majority of the countries in this region toward a unified view of how these E. coli infections continue been such a serious threats to humans.

6 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Torres et al.

REFERENCES [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33]

Escherich T. Die darmbakterien des neugeborenen und sauglings. Fortshr Med 1885;3:5-15-522,47-54. Conway PL. Microbial ecology of the human large intestine. In: Gibson GR, Macfarlane GT, editors. Human colonic bacteria: role in nutrition, physiology and pathology. Boca Raton, FL.: CRC Press; 1995. p. 1-24. Ewing WH. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae. 4th ed ed. Edwards, Ewing, editors. New York: Elsevier; 1986. Shiloach J, Reshamwala S, Noronha SB, et al. Analyzing metabolic variations in different bacterial strains, historical perspectives and current trends - example E. coli. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2010;Jan 28 [Epub ahead of print]. Leclerc H, Mossel DA, Edberg SC, et al. Advances in the bacteriology of the coliform group: their suitability as markers of microbial water safety. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001;55:201-34. Simpson JM, Santo Domingo JW, Reasoner DJ. Microbial source tracking: state of the science. Environ Sci Technol. 2002;36:5279-88. APHA. Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods. 3rd ed ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 1992. APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 1998. Wohlsen T, Bates J, Vesey G, et al. Evaluation of the methods for enumerating coliform bacteria from water samples using precise reference standards. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006;42:350-6. Huang SW, Chang CH, Tai TF, et al. Comparison of the beta-glucuronidase assay and the conventional method for identification of Escherichia coli on eosin-methylene blue agar. J Food Prot. 1997;60:6-9. CDC. Diagnosis and management of foodborne illnesses: a primer for physicians and other health care professionals. MMWR. 2004;53:352-6. Erickson MC, Doyle MP. Food as a vehicle for transmission of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. J Food Prot. 2007;70:2426-49. Pearson H. The dark side of E. coli. Nature. 2007;445:8-9. Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HL. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:123-40. Zhou Z, Li X, Liu B, et al. Derivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from its O55:H7 precursor. PLoS One. 2010;5:e8700. Yan F, Polk DB. Commensal bacteria in the gut: learning who our friends are. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2004;20:565-71. Packey CD, Sartor RB. Commensal bacteria, traditional and opportunistic pathogens, dysbiosis and bacterial killing in inflammatory bowel diseases. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2009;22:292-301. Duriez P, Clermont O, Bonacorsi S, et al. Commensal Escherichia coli isolates are phylogenetically distributed among geographically distinct human populations. Microbiology. 2001;147:1671-6. Croxen MA, Finlay BB. Molecular mechanisms of Escherichia coli pathogenicity. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:26-38. Mühldorfer I, Hacker J. Genetic aspects of Escherichia coli virulence. Microb Pathog. 1994;16:171-81. Finlay BB, Falkow S. Common themes in microbial pathogenicity revisited. Microb Mol Biol Rev 1997;61:136-69. Torres AG. The cad locus of Enterobacteriaceae: more than just lysine decarboxylation. Anaerobe. 2009;15:1-6. Sokurenko EV, Hasty DL, Dykhuizen DE. Pathoadaptive mutations: gene loss and variation in bacterial pathogens. Trends Microbiol. 1999;7:191-5. Selander RK, Levin BR. Genetic diversity and structure in Escherichia coli populations. Science. 1980;210:545-7. Herzer PJ, Inouye S, Inouye M, et al. Phylogenetic distribution of branched RNA-linked multicopy single-stranded DNA among natural isolates of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1990;172:6175-81. Clermont O, Bonacorsi S, Bingen E. Rapid and Simple Determination of the Escherichia coli Phylogenetic Group. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:4555–8. Pupo GM, Karaolis R, Lan R, et al. Evolutionary relationship among pathogenic and non pathogenic Escherichia coli strains inferred from multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and mdh sequence studies. Infect Immun 1997;65:2685-92. Pupo GM, Lan R, Reeves PR. Multiple independent origins of Shigella clones of Escherichia coli and convergent evolution of many of their characteristics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:10567-72. Picard B, Sevali-Garcia J, Gouriou S, et al. The link between phylogeny and virulence in Escherichia coli extraintestinal infection. Infect Immun. 1999;67:546-53. Rolhion N, Darfeuille-Michaud A. Adherent-invasive Escherichia coli in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13:1277-83. Gill SR, Pop M, Deboy RT, et al. Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science. 2006;312:1355-9. Turnbaugh PJ, Hamady M, Yatsunenko T, et al. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature. 2009;457:480-4. Jia W, Li H, Zhao L, et al. Gut microbiota: a potential new territory for drug targeting. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:123-9.

Overview of Escherichia coli

[34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49]

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 7

Marshall BM, Ochieng DJ, Levy SB. Commensals: Underappreciated Reservoir of Antibiotic Resistance. Microbe. 2009;4:231. Kijima-Tanaka M, Ishihara K, Morioka A, et al. A national surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from food-producing animals in Japan. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51:447–51. Von Baum H, Marre R. Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli and therapeutic implications. Int J Med Microbiol. 2005;295:503–11. Prats G, Mirelis B, Miro E, et al. Cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli among summer camp attendees with salmonellosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:1273-80. Carattoli A. Resistance Plasmid Families in Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:2227–38. Martínez JL, Baquero F. Interactions among Strategies Associated with Bacterial Infection: Pathogenicity, Epidemicity, and Antibiotic Resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:647–79. Venturini C, Beatson SA, Djordjevic SP, et al. Multiple antibiotic resistance gene recruitment onto the enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli virulence plasmid. FASEB J. 2010;24:1160-6. Hammerum AM, Heuer OE. Human Health Hazards from Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli of Animal Origin. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:916–21. Nataro JP, Kaper JB. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:142-201. Rodríguez-Ángeles G. Principal characteristics and diagnosis of the pathogenic groups of Escherichia coli. Salud Publica Mex. 2002;44:464-75. Cravioto A, Vasquez V. Escherichia coli: pathogenic mechanisms and enterohemorrhagic strains. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 1988;45:196-7. Cravioto A, Gross RJ, Scotland SM, et al. An adhesive factor found in Escherichia coli belonging to the traditional infantile enteropathogenic serogroups. Microbiology. 1979;6:3427-37. Torres AG, Zhou X, Kaper JB. Adherence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli strains to epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 2005;73:18-29. Knutton S, Baldwin T, Williams PH, et al. Actin accumulation at sites of bacterial adhesion to tissue culture cells: basis of a new diagnostic test for enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 1989;57:1290-8. Knutton S, Lloyd DR, McNeish AS. Adhesion of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to human intestinal enterocytes and cultured human intestinal mucosa. Infect Immun. 1987;55:69-77. Prado V, O'Ryan ML. Acute gastroenteritis in Latin America. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1994;8:77-106.

8

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America, 2010, 8-24

CHAPTER 2 Evolution and Epidemiology of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli Nina D Williams1, Alfredo G Torres1,2 and Sonja J Lloyd1,* 1

Department of Microbiology and Immunology and 2Department of Pathology and the Sealy Center for Vaccine Development, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-1070. Abstract: The emergence and evolution of pathogenic Escherichia coli strains associated with diarrheal diseases have become a topic of active investigation in recent years due to the emergence of more virulent strains and the association of new serotypes with disease. Outbreak studies indicate that most patients with an intestinal E. coli infection develop mild, uncomplicated diarrhea. However, a significant risk exists that infections caused by highly virulent E. coli isolates, such as the enterohemorrhagic E. coli O157:H7, develop into serious and potentially life-threatening complications, such as hemolytic uremic syndrome. The relative contribution of recombination events in the generation of new categories of pathogenic E. coli varies among the E. coli population, and it is represented by the wide variety of mobile elements found in different diarrheal strains (e.g. pathogenicity islands, phages, transposons, pathoadaptive mutations, etc). Understanding the population structure of pathogenic E. coli is important, since it impacts the effectiveness of molecular epidemiological studies. Such studies are needed to understand the increasingly recognized diversity of enterotoxigenic E. coli, a leading cause of pediatric and travelers’ diarrhea. In addition, factors underlying the emergence of enteroaggregative and atypical enteropathogenic E. coli strains associated with persistent diarrhea are unknown. Horizontal transfer of genetic elements that affect virulence of diarrheagenic E. coli strains and changes in global agricultural processes, as well as movement of humans and animals, may contribute to the complex natural history of diarrheagenic E. coli.

INTRODUCTION TO E. COLI EVOLUTION Biologists have long considered the mechanisms behind genetic variation and how it arises and persists. Organisms must have a balance between robustness and evolution capability, between an individual’s physiological responses to change and the changes by which a population of genomes continuously updates information about past experiences and how future generations should respond to those influences [1]. Adaptation has been historically viewed as a gradual process. Early studies led to two generalizations concerning the emergence and persistence of this variation. First, competition for the same limiting resources selects for the one fittest variant. Second, variation arising from mutations is subject to “periodic selection,” which leads to a succession of clones each more fit than its predecessor [2]. Now, experimental evidence demonstrates how one clone of Escherichia coli adapts to a particular environmental factor and suggests that multiple genotypes can arise from a single ancestral clone and can co-exist over time – that in other words, out of one comes many [2]. Empirical evidence has been found for alternating periods of stasis and rapid evolution[3]. Environmental changes are an insidious part of an organism’s life, and the mechanisms that allow adjustment to environmental conditions will compensate for the effects of the mutations required to produce that phenotype. Selection may favor mutants better adapted to particular regions or those that are better able to colonize niches at the boundaries of these regions. Selection may also favor clones that can better scavenge limited resources or more efficiently use those resources for essential processes. The outcome is dependent upon the founding ancestral clone, the pathways which lead to the different adaptive strategies, the influence of differential gene regulation on the evolutionary process, and the likelihood that key steps along these pathways will actually occur (i.e. mutations). Variation in the adaptation rate may be as a result of environmental changes, the invasion of new habitats, and other circumstances which either promote or inhibit gene flow[3]. Evolution at the molecular level is now known to have arisen from many directions: single base changes; loss, duplication, or rearrangement of genes; and, importantly, the horizontal transfer of genes [4]. Current ideas concerning bacterial evolution center on the idea that pathogenic diversity is the result of the acquisition of pathogenic genes, or virulence determinants, through horizontal gene transfer. E. coli is a good model *Address correspondence to: Sonja J. Lloyd, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, Texas 77555-1070; Tel (409) 747-2424. E-mail: [email protected] Alfredo G. Torres (Ed) All rights reserved - © 2010 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Evolution and Epidemiology of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 9

for addressing this question as it is the best known member of the normal microbiota of the human intestine and is the most intensively studied and best understood of all bacteria. The reference strain K-12 and its derivatives have been vital in the advancement of the fields of genetics, molecular biology, and physiology. Investigations of E. coli virulence have revealed a wealth of information regarding the emergence and evolution of these pathogens. Comparison of the genomic sequences of the non-pathogenic laboratory strain K-12 with that of E. coli O157:H7 has shown that these strains share a common DNA backbone, with numerous islands of DNA that were apparently acquired over an extended period of time through horizontal gene transfer [5]. The ongoing and stepwise evolution of E. coli allows it to adapt to constantly changing conditions and environments and ensures the emergence of new pathogenic clones. In a study to better understand the genetic relationships of commensal and pathogenic E. coli strains, multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE) was used at 10 enzyme loci to determine the genetic diversity of E. coli and the relationship of pathogenic clones to commensal clones. Results showed that pathogenic E. coli strains do not have a single evolutionary origin but have actually arisen several times [6], likely due to the lateral transfer of specific virulence factors which are subject to strong natural selection. E. coli is a diverse species with both commensal and pathogenic strains. E. coli strains may not have always been pathogenic; the one common ancestor evolved into pathogenic strains due to the acquisition of mobile genetic elements such as plasmids and pathogenicity islands (PAIs), as well as due to integration of bacteriophages and transposons. Changes in microbial populations can lead to the evolution of entirely new pathogens, development of new virulent strains in old pathogens, adaptation to new niches, the development of antibiotic resistance, or to changes in the ability to survive in adverse environmental conditions. The virulence determinants encoded on these mobile genetic elements are supposed to be highly interchangeable among bacterial species, and though initially mobile may become ‘locked’ into the genome [7]. Each pathotype of E. coli has unique virulence mechanisms, with the exception of enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), which is a clonal group derived from enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) [8]. Physiologically, E. coli is versatile and well adapted to its characteristic habitats, and can respond to environmental signals such as pH, temperature, osmolarity, as well as a multitude of other stimulants. There are several highly adapted clones that have acquired specific virulence elements which confer an increased ability to adapt to new niches. Diseases caused or effects of infection depend on the distribution and expression of the specific array of pathogenic (virulence) determinants possessed by the organism, including adhesins, secretion systems, and toxins, and the ability to withstand host defenses. The very diversity of E. coli and its pathogenic clones is due to the continued arrival of different virulence determinants into the population, from other E. coli species or other enteric pathogens such as Salmonella, Shigella, and Yersinia. This again emphasizes the idea that pathogenic E. coli do not originate from a single ancestor, but instead have arisen several times from several ancestors [9]. Virulence Determinants, How They Are Acquired How do bacteria adapt to the life-style of a pathogen? Ecological niches that non-pathogenic bacteria might inhabit, such as soil, are very different from the niches encountered upon infecting a vertebrate host [5]. These hosts have defenses that have evolved through co-evolution with microbes – physical barriers, such as the skin and the mucuscovered epithelia, up to the more elaborate antimicrobial peptides and immune responses enacted by the host. The factors and mechanisms that pathogens have evolved to circumvent these defenses are termed virulence factors. Several highly adapted E. coli clones have acquired specific virulence attributes, which has conferred upon them the ability to adapt to new niches and thus cause a spectrum of diseases [10]. The virulence determinants of each E. coli pathotype are distinct, but can generally be categorized as either colonization factors or secreted proteins. The colonization factors, such as adhesins, enable the bacteria to bind closely to the intestinal mucosa and resist clearance. Most frequently, these adhesins form distinct structures on the bacterial cell surface termed fimbriae or pili, though they also include outer-membrane proteins such as intimin in EPEC and EHEC, and other non-fimbrial proteins. Secreted proteins, including toxins and other effector proteins, interfere with the normal physiological processes of host cells such as protein synthesis and the regulation of intracellular messengers such as cAMP and cGMP. By one means or another, pathogenic strains of E. coli have perfect mechanisms to acclimate to new environmental pressures and to survive in novel niches which they previously did not inhabit, consequently causing damage to host tissues and leading to disease. Genes can be taken up as naked DNA or transferred in the form of

 

10 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Williams et al.

plasmids, conjugative transposons, or bacteriophages, and the transferred DNA can range in size from less than 1 to more than 100 kb, and encode entire metabolic pathways [5]. Virulence is often conferred to bacteria by pathogenicity islands, which refer to clusters of virulence-associated genes that are found on the chromosomes of pathogenic bacteria but are absent from non-pathogenic strains. These islands often show evidence of having been acquired from other bacteria [11], including a nucleotide base composition different from the native chromosome in general and possibly the presence of mobile genetic elements at the termini. These fragments of genetic material can lead to increased virulence or even change a non-pathogenic organism to a pathogen. Bacteriophages, the viruses that infect bacteria, are important vehicles for horizontal gene exchange between different bacterial species and account for a good share of the strain-to-strain differences within bacterial species, such as E. coli. Studies have indicated that some pro-phages carry additional genes (termed lysogenic conversion genes) that are not required for the phage life cycle. Instead, many lysogenic conversion genes from prophages in pathogenic bacteria encode proven or suspected virulence factors. They are postulated to change the phenotype or fitness of the lysogen [5]. Phages have thus emerged as prime suspects in the adaptation of pathogens to new hosts and the emergence of new pathogens or epidemic clones. Phages can also serve as anchor points for genome rearrangements, and protect a bacterium from lytic phage infection, and, most importantly, have the ability to introduce new virulence factors. Transposable elements are discrete DNA segments that have the ability to move from site to site in a genome, independent of extensive DNA sequence homology [12]. These transposable elements often cause spontaneous mutations, regulate the expression of genes near their insertion sites, and induce cycles of chromosome breakage and rearrangement. They play a special role in bacterial evolution because of their ability to move between the chromosome and the various plasmid and phage DNAs resident in a bacterial cell and, when piggybacked on these molecules, to move between unrelated bacteria in a population. Virtually, any gene can become associated with a transposable element, and elements called transposons containing genes whose functions are unrelated to movement are now common. It has been suggested that, especially during periods of drastic environmental change, transposable elements make great contributions to the adaptability and evolution of bacterial populations [12]. Besides pathogenicity islands, bacteriophages, and transposons, plasmids play an important role in the transfer of genetic information between clones. Bacterial plasmids are self-replicating, extrachromosomal replicons and are key agents of change in microbial populations. Naturally occurring plasmids are able to promote the dissemination of a variety of traits, from antibiotic resistance to the ability to metabolize certain substances, and recombinant plasmids based off these wild type plasmids have been essential to the field of molecular biology. E. coli strains have been found to possess a wide variety of plasmid types, including those associated with virulence. Some of these are essential for virulence in the various pathotypes of E. coli, and it has been shown that the majority of these E. coli virulence plasmids have evolved from a single plasmid backbone type through the acquisition of traits that are essential for and specific to the particular pathotypes [13]. E. coli Pathotypes Though E. coli are historically classified based on the serology of the O (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) and H (Hauch, flagellar) antigens, more recently the terms virotype and/or pathotype have been used, to refer to a group of strains of a single species that cause a common disease using a common set of virulence factors. Only the most successful combination of virulence factors have persisted to become specific pathotypes, and each pathotype represents a family of E. coli clones that share virulence determinants, which were acquired by horizontal gene transfer between E. coli and other bacterial species [10-11]. Individual strains of each pathotype possess a distinct set of virulenceassociated characteristics that determine the pathological and clinical features of the diseases they cause; only the most successful combinations of virulence factors persist to become specific pathotypes. There are more than 180 O serogroups of E. coli, each of which is further subdivided into more than 60 H serotypes, to give more than 10,000 possible combinations [11]. The clonal nature of these pathogenic bacteria is seen in the fact that they generally belong to distinctive O serogroups and O:H serotypes and has recently been inferred by sequencing studies and multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE) of different E. coli clones [6].

 

Evolution and Epidemiology of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 11

Eight distinct pathotypic categories (also known as pathovars) of E. coli have been described, which are broadly classified into diarrheagenic E. coli (DEC) or extraintestinal E. coli (ExPEC). Two pathovars are extraintestinal, the uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC), and the neonatal meningitis E. coli (NMEC). Six pathovars are diarrheagenic: enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), and diffusely-adhering E. coli (DAEC) (Fig. 1) [10]. Several evolutionary events have permitted the differentiation of the different pathovars. For example, EPEC produce a characteristic intestinal histopathology known as the attaching and effacing (A/E) lesion, and the ability to form this lesion is conferred by the chromosomally-located Locus of Enterocyte Effacement (LEE) Pathogenicity Island. The LEE is in fact present in a family of pathogens, including EHEC, all able to confer the attaching and effacing lesion [10, 14]. EPEC also produce a type IV pilus, known as the bundle-forming pilus (BFP), expressed from 14 genes on a virulence-associated plasmid (pEAF) carried by certain EPEC strains [15-16]. Bundle-forming pili are thought to mediate both initial binding to host cells and interbacterial interactions leading to the formation of three-dimensional microcolonies of attached bacteria [17]. In the case of EHEC, this pathovar is distinguished from other strains on the ability to produce Shiga toxins (Stx), the key virulence determinant for these strains, which is transmitted among Shigella and E. coli strains by toxinencoding bacteriophages [18]. For EPEC and EHEC, the majority of virulence determinants are encoded on ‘O’ islands or plasmids and so these were the focus for comparison. Analysis of the originally described 177 ‘Ospecific’ islands provides insights into the evolution of the two strains[19]. Homologous sequences can be demonstrated for nearly all the ‘O157’ islands in EPEC E2348/69, with only 14 showing little nucleotide homology (below 55%). Sixty-nine of the islands have 49% nucleotide homology [17]. This divergence offers considerable range for differences in the carriage and expression of virulence determinants. Therefore, variation in these Oislands impacts host adaptation, tissue tropism and virulence and this assumption is a simplification that belies the evolution adapting the strains to different hosts and the complex interactions on the host mucosa that lead to an asymptomatic or pathogenic outcome. In addition, not all strains of Stx-producing E. coli are able to cause the more serious clinical syndromes associated with EHEC infection. Those that can usually carry other virulence determinants in addition to Stx, such as the LEE pathogenicity island or a distinctive hemolysin known as enterohemolysin or EHEC hemolysin [10-11]. In fact, the only E. coli pathotypes that share virulence determinants are EPEC and EHEC, likely because EHEC strains have evolved from EPEC ancestors [20-22]. This demonstrates the compound effect that multiple virulence determinants can have on a pathogen. For ETEC strains to cause disease, they must attach to the epithelia of the small intestine, colonize, secrete either of both of two varieties of enterotoxin, the heat-labile enterotoxin (LT) and heat-stable enterotoxin (ST), and evade host defenses while causing damage to the host. ETEC adhesins, known as colonization factors (CFs), allow binding to the small intestinal mucosa – a region where E. coli normally does not display tropism. Human ETEC CFs can be either plasmid or chromosomally encoded; however the majority are plasmid-encoded and appear to have been horizontally-acquired due to the presence of flanking insertion sequences and transposons [13]. The colonization factors themselves have undergone extensive evolution, resulting in at least 22 human ETEC CF genetic variants. For example, the pCOO plasmid was the first ETEC CF-encoding plasmid to be sequenced. Isolated from strain C921b-1, this plasmid encodes the CS1 and CS3 variants of CFs [13]. Genome sequencing of ETEC strain E24377A showed this strain has six plasmids, ranging in size from 5 to 80Kb. The CS1 antigen of this strain is encoded on the pETEC_73 plasmid, which is similar to the pCOO plasmid in its possession of CS1 and in the RepI1 backbone of the plasmid. This indicates that the CS1 operon was introduced into an ancestral plasmid and maintained by certain strains, prior to the integration of RepFIIA components into the pCOO plasmid [13] and its maintenance in other ETEC strains. Indeed, the presence of other CF-encoding plasmids with the same Rep backbones, such as the CFA/I on the pH10407_95 plasmid from strain H10407, further suggests that the ETEC CF operons have been acquired on multiple occasions on multiple plasmid backbones. EAEC is another pathovar which is a very heterogeneous pathogen and a complicating factor is that some EAEC strains are pathogenic while others are not. These strains are often recovered from apparently healthy individuals and there was a failure of some studies to show a correlation between EAEC and disease [23]. Although three major EAEC phylogenetic groups, EAEC1, EAEC2, and AA/DA (aggregative adherence/diffuse adherence) have been

 

12 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Williams et al.

identified on the basis of multilocus enzyme electrophoretic (MLEE) patterns, EAEC phylogeny overlaps with the also heterogeneous DAEC group [24]. However, members of each of the three clusters show conserved plasmid and chromosomal loci, suggesting the most EAEC, like other pathotypes of diarrheagenic E. coli, show a conserved linkage of virulence genes [23]. The primary virulence factor of EAEC is the aggregative adherence phenotype, which is associated with aggregative adherent fimbriae (AAF) and localized to a 55-65MDa plasmid, the pAA plasmid [13]. Similar to the ETEC colonization factors (CFs), EAEC adhesins are multiple and diverse and allelic variants of AAF have been identified. A study by Jenkins et al. differentiated two groups of EAEC on the basis of the presence or absence of genes on the pAA plasmid, and thus designates “typical” and “atypical” EAEC with typical strains possessing pAA-associated genes, including aggR, as well as certain chromosomal islands that are apparently co-inherited[25]. Another EAEC virulence factor identified as a putative cause of diarrhea was the enteroaggregative heat-stable toxin EAST-1[26]. This toxin activates guanylate cyclase and causes ion secretion; however, no association has been identified between EAST-1 and diarrheal illness, and EAST1 has been detected in other diarrheagenic E. coli pathotypes. Three plasmids from EAEC strains have been completely sequenced: pO42, which belongs to the AAF/II+ strain O42; 55989p, which belongs to AAF/III+ strain 55989; and pO86A1, which has a novel AAF-like operon [13]. Finally, there are no known pathogenicity islands in EAEC; however, islands associated with other members of the family Enterobacteriaceae have been found in EAEC. Examples include a hemolysin-pyleonephritis-associated pili island associated with ExPEC and the high pathogenicity island originally described in Yersinia, which has genes for the synthesis of the siderophore yersiniabactin and its uptake protein [23]. Commensal E. coli LEE PAI (Intimin) Lpf fimbriae

CF As PAI

Atypical EPEC

LT/ST Enterotoxins

EHEC plasmid

EAF plasmid (Bfp)

Shi PAI

pAA plasmid

Inv plasmid

Afa/Dr fimbriae

Enterotoxins

Stx genes CFA

EIEC ETEC Bfp Lpf

Typical EPEC

EHEC STEC

Afa/Dr

EAEC

DAEC

Figure 1: Escherichia coli encompass a continuously evolving group that includes both commensal and pathogenic strains. The pathogenic diversity of E. coli is a result of deletion or acquisition of genes, which confer virulence properties to different bacterial isolates. Only the most successful combinations of virulence factors, commonly encoded on mobile genetic elements, have persisted to become part of specific E. coli pathotypes. Virulence determinants encoded by these elements include the EPEC adherence factor (EAF), EHEC virulence, and EIEC invasion plasmids; the Locus of Enterocyte Effacement pathogenicity island (LEE PAI) of EHEC and EPEC; the plasmid-encoded heat stable and heat labile enterotoxins of ETEC, and the bacteriophageencoded Shiga toxin (Stx) of EHEC. Other categories of pathogenic E. coli, such as EAEC, EIEC and DAEC possess unique combinations of virulence determinants. Abbreviations: EPEC, enteropathogenic E. coli; EHEC, enterohemorrhagic E. coli; STEC, Shiga toxin-producing E. coli; ETEC, enterotoxigenic E. coli; EAEC, enteroaggregative E. coli; EIEC, enteroinvasive E. coli; DAEC, diffusely adherent E. coli.

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF INTESTINAL Escherichia coli PATHOTYPES Intestinal E. coli pathotypes (or diarrheagenic E. coli, DEC) cause significant morbidity and mortality worldwide in children under 5 years of age, especially in the developing world. ETEC strains alone are responsible for millions of diarrheal episodes and an estimated 380,000 deaths each year [27-28]. The majority of diarrhea cases due to DEC are caused by ETEC; however other DEC pathotypes also cause significant disease, such as EPEC and, increasingly, EAEC. Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) infections are relatively rare in both developed and developing countries; however, STEC, especially EHEC of the serotype O157:H7, are considered important pathogens due to

 

Evolution and Epidemiology of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 13

the potential for life-threatening sequelae, such as hemorrhagic colitis and hemolytic uremic syndrome. Widespread use of oral rehydration therapy since the 1980’s has reduced the severity of disease and mortalities due to acute diarrheal episodes. Since the reduction of serious disease due to acute diarrhea, the incidence of persistent diarrhea (defined as diarrhea lasting >14 days) has increased, and approximately 50% of those who die as a result of diarrheal disease have persistent diarrhea [29]. In conjunction, detection of EPEC and EAEC strains that are associated with persistent diarrhea has increased. All intestinal E. coli pathotypes are transmitted via the fecal-oral route and most infections occur as a result of contaminated food or water. Humans are the major reservoir of EPEC, EAEC and ETEC, while cattle are the main reservoir for STEC. EPEC, EAEC and ETEC have all been isolated from various animals, but the role of these animals in transmission is unclear. Epidemiology of EPEC EPEC is a major cause of persistent diarrhea in children less than 2 years of age throughout the developing world where it is endemic [30]. It is estimated that 5-10% of all diarrheal cases in children are caused by EPEC when identification is based on molecular methods, or 10 - 20% when based on serotyping or adherence to cultured human epithelial cells [30]. All EPEC carry the eae gene, encoding the receptor intimin, which is contained within the LEE pathogenicity island. EPEC strains are classified as either typical or atypical EPEC based on the presence (typical) or absence (atypical) of bundle-forming pili (BFP) [31]. Although detection of BFP is considered the best criteria for accurate classification of EPEC, many investigators distinguish EPEC strains by the presence or absence of the gene encoding the BFP (bfpA) or of EPEC adherence factor plasmid (pEAF) which carries bfpA [32]. Typical EPEC have been a leading cause of persistent watery diarrhea in children of developing countries, but have been supplanted over the last decade by emerging atypical EPEC strains in both developed and developing countries [30]. EAEC, followed by typical EPEC, were the predominant diarrheagenic E. coli isolated from children under 5 years of age that were hospitalized for acute or persistent diarrhea in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania [33]. Results of a study in Brazil showed a similar trend, although EAEC and, in this case, atypical EPEC, were the predominant diarrheagenic E. coli pathogens in children less than 5 years of age presenting with diarrhea to hospitals or clinics in two large urban centers in Sao Paulo State, Brazil [34]. Typical EPEC was also recovered in this study, but mostly from a population at high risk of typical EPEC infection in the past. This observation supports the hypothesis that the shift in prevalence from typical to atypical EPEC in Brazil and other parts of South America may be due to improved sanitation and/or other living conditions or factors that allowed for the emergence of atypical EPEC strains [32, 35]. Other studies conducted in Mexico, Peru and Uruguay also found atypical EPEC (typical EPEC was also detected in diarrhea cases but at a lower prevalence) as one of the most frequently isolated diarrheagenic E. coli pathotypes in young children with acute or persistent diarrhea [36-43]. Gomes et al. (2004) reported atypical EPEC in children, adults and AIDS patients with diarrhea, in three urban centers in Brazil, indicating that atypical EPEC is an important cause of diarrhea in adults and the immunocompromised as well as in children. EPEC outbreaks involving adults have occurred [44-45] and presumably a high dose is ingested because in volunteer studies diarrhea can be induced with doses of 108 – 1010 CFU/ml and after neutralization of gastric acid with sodium bicarbonate [46]. Atypical EPEC is also an important cause of sporadic and epidemic diarrhea in developed countries. Sporadic cases are mainly detected in children, while epidemics affect both children and adults. Atypical EPEC made up 71% (30/42) of diarrheagenic E. coli isolated from children less than 14 years old with persistent diarrhea in Australia [47]. Similarly, a study in Norway found EPEC more frequently than any other enteric pathogen in the stools of children less than 2 years of age. All but one of the 44 EPEC isolates were atypical EPEC, and one-third of the patients from whom atypical EPEC was recovered had persistent diarrhea [48]. A subsequent study by Afset et al. (2004) was unable to show a significant association between atypical EPEC and diarrhea in children less than 5 years old in Norway; however, an association was detected between atypical EPEC and persistent diarrhea [49]. While typical EPEC are very rarely isolated in developed countries, outbreaks of diarrhea due to atypical EPEC have occurred in the United States, Finland and Japan [44-45, 50]. An outbreak in Minnesota affected >100 patrons and workers of a restaurant. Foodborne transmission of EPEC was suspected, but no single vehicle was implicated, and contamination of various foods by an infected restaurant worker could not be ruled out [44]. No source of infection was identified in a diarrheal outbreak in Finland that affected both children and adults [45]. A waterborne

 

14 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Williams et al.

diarrheal outbreak occurred in Japan that affected children from 12-15 years old [50], while another Japanese outbreak involved infants in a daycare facility [51]. Humans are considered to be the major reservoir of typical EPEC, although there are increasing reports of isolation from dogs, cats, monkeys and deer [52-56]. EPEC that carried eae, bfpA and/or the EAF plasmid, but belonged to the non-classical EPEC serotype O157:H45 were isolated from cattle in Switzerland [57]. EPEC strains of this serotype have been isolated from humans, and one such strain caused an outbreak in Japan [58-59]. Atypical EPEC are shed by domesticated animals (cats, dogs, cattle, sheep, pigs, rabbits, chickens, duck, geese, and pigeons) and wildlife (monkeys, deer) [53-55, 60-62]. These animals may serve as reservoirs of atypical EPEC infection in humans, as several studies have identified aEPEC from animals that carried virulence genes or displayed phenotypes associated with human infection. These findings led to the suggestion that colonization by these isolates is not restricted to a particular species [53, 55, 62]. Despite isolation of typical and atypical EPEC from multiple animal sources and animal products, currently there is no evidence of zoonotic transmission. Typical EPEC generally belong to the serogroups O26, O55, O86, O111,O114, O119, O125, O126, O127, O128, O142, O158 [35] which are referred to as classic EPEC serotypes. Eighty-one percent of atypical EPEC do not belong to these classic EPEC serogroups and 26.6% are untypeable. The most frequent serogroups of atypical EPEC are O26, O51, O55, O111, O119, and O145, some of which are also classic EPEC serotypes. Initially, typical and atypical EPEC were classified based on serotype, however, new methods to distinguish between atypical and typical EPEC became necessary due to shared serotypes between these groups. These methods include detection of virulence genes such as eae and bfpA and virulence traits such as formation of attaching and effacing lesions and pattern of adherence on epithelial cells. Typical EPEC exhibit a localized adherence (LA) pattern, whereas atypical EPEC can exhibit localized-like (LAL), diffuse (DA), or aggregative adherence (AA) patterns. Epidemiology of EAEC EAEC is an important cause of diarrhea in children and adults in both developing and developed countries. EAEC strains can cause acute and persistent (>14 days) diarrhea along with inflammation. EAEC was first described in 1987 in a child from Chile with persistent diarrhea [63]. Several studies have since shown an association between EAEC and persistent diarrhea in children throughout the developing world [64-67]. More recently, a meta-analysis of 41 case-control studies involving populations from developing and industrialized countries demonstrated more frequent isolation of EAEC from children with acute diarrheal illness compared to controls [68]. A significant association was also detected between EAEC and acute diarrhea in children of industrialized countries, HIV-infected adults from developing countries, adults from developing countries, and adult travelers to developing regions [68]. EAEC is second only to ETEC as a cause of diarrhea in travelers to developing countries, being responsible for 24.1% and 16% of cases in Latin America and South Asia, respectively [69]. There is also evidence that EAEC causes sporadic diarrhea in adults of industrialized countries [70-71]. In studies conducted at sites in Brazil and Peru, EAEC was one of the most frequently isolated pathotype of diarrheagenic E. coli recovered from children with diarrhea [38, 72]. Most EAEC cases are sporadic, but several food and waterborne outbreaks of diarrhea affecting both children and adults in Europe, the UK, the US and Japan have been described [73-74]. In 1993, 40.6% of 2,697 Japanese children who ate school lunches developed diarrhea, which was persistent in 10% of cases [73]. Two outbreaks of diarrhea due to EAEC occurred within 10 days of each other at a holiday farm restaurant in Italy [74]. The infection sources in both the Japanese and Italian outbreaks were identified epidemiologically; EAEC was not recovered from the implicated food items. EAEC has been recovered from both asymptomatic individuals and those with diarrhea, which suggests that humans are likely the reservoir of EAEC infection. Fecally-contaminated food and water may serve as source of infection, and vehicles include produce, unpasteurized dairy products, sauces and baby bottles [75]. Other risk factors include travel to developing countries, poor hygiene, host susceptibility and possibly immunosuppression due to HIV infection [68, 75-76].

 

Evolution and Epidemiology of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 15

EAEC has been recovered from animals such as calves, piglets and horses, which may indicate that these animals are potential reservoirs for human EAEC infection [77-78]. However, Uber et al. (2006) found that clinical isolates of EAEC from calves, piglets and horses with diarrhea were not typical EAEC, in that they lacked the plasmidencoded aggR gene. These atypical EAEC animal isolates were also found to carry few or none of the other EAEC virulence markers which leads to the suggestion that animals may not be a reservoir for human pathogenic EAEC. Another study that examined clinical samples from horses included isolates from both diarrheal feces and extraintestinal sites [77]. One isolate was found to carry several putative virulence genes, including aggR, that are associated with EAEC diarrhea in humans. The risk of infection from animals appears low; therefore, humans remain the most likely reservoir of EAEC infection. Common EAEC serotypes include O44:H18 and O111:H12 as well as the serogroups O125 and O126, although much serotype diversity has been reported [75]. The aggregative nature of the bacterium results in many strains being untypeable for the O antigen. Further evidence of heterogeneity is found in volunteer studies that demonstrate virulent and avirulent strains of EAEC (some strains elicit diarrhea in volunteers, while others do not) [79]. These observations may explain the high frequency of EAEC recovery from asymptomatic individuals. Efforts to identify markers associated with EAEC pathogenicity are ongoing. The CVD432 probe can be useful in identifying EAEC strains, although sensitivity can range from 15–90%, depending on the geographic region [75]. The presence of this probe was associated with persistent diarrhea in children compared to healthy controls or to children with acute diarrhea in a case-control study conducted in Brazil [80]. Diarrhea was positively associated with heat stable enterotoxin (EAST1)-positive and EAST1/CVD432-positive EAEC strains in this study [80], although few studies have found an association between the virulence of EAEC strains and any one or group of these markers. The heterogeneity of EAEC strains, as well as host factors, likely contribute to the role of EAEC in both acute and persistent diarrhea with a range of accompanying symptoms, including intestinal inflammation, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, low-grade fever and blood or mucus in stools. Epidemiology of STEC Shiga-toxigenic E. coli (STEC) strains are not a major cause of diarrhea, although STEC infection can lead to severe and life-threatening disease. Many STEC are able to form attaching and effacing lesions in the intestine through the expression of the proteins encoded on the LEE, but it is the production of Shiga toxins (Stx) that defines this E. coli pathotype. Toxin production is also thought to be responsible for the damage leading to serious sequelae such as hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Some strains of STEC that cause bloody diarrhea, a risk factor for HUS, are also known as enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), which is a subset of STEC. Unlike other DEC pathotypes, cattle are the main animal reservoir of STEC and are the major source of direct and indirect transmission. Since the emergence of E. coli O157:H7, other STEC serotypes have also been recognized as causes of serious disease [81]. Both O157 and non-O157 STEC infections are reported mainly in developed countries such as the United States, Canada, UK, Japan, Australia, Europe and Argentina. Outbreaks are common and receive much attention in the press but most STEC cases are sporadic. Only 25.7% of STEC infections in the US in 2008 were outbreak-associated [82]. As, with other DEC pathotypes, children are most at risk of infection and are also more likely to develop severe disease, although HUS can occur at all ages. The elderly are also vulnerable to developing severe manifestations of STEC infection and they are most likely to succumb to STEC-associated disease even in the absence of severe complications [83]. STEC infections are rare in developing countries and few outbreaks are reported. In a meta-analysis of 19 studies which examined the pathogens isolated from cases of persistent diarrhea in children under 6 years of age residing in low to middle income countries, there were only two studies which tested for EHEC, and neither detected it in cases or controls [84]. Several studies in Brazil have identified STEC in human clinical isolates, including the first report in that country of O111:NM infection [85] and possibly the first outbreak in Brazil caused by E. coli O157:H7 [8687]. A study in the Amazon found 0.63% of cases carried STEC. STEC infection was found to be significantly associated with EPEC diarrhea cases, although only 3 cases were positive for STEC [41]. E. coli O157:H7 or nonmotile strains of the serogroup O157 (O157:H- or O157:NM) have been detected in a collection of food, animal and human clinical isolates from South America [88]. These O157 isolates carried several virulence markers associated

 

16 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Williams et al.

with human disease. In children over 2 but less than 12 years-old in Mexico City, 8.6% of diarrheal pathogens were STEC [42]. Most of the STEC isolates carried the stx2 gene which is associated with development of HUS. Converse to the trend of low prevalence of STEC-associated disease in Mexico and many South American countries, Argentina has the highest rates of HUS in the world at 12.2 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in 2002. Elsewhere, most HUS cases are associated with the O157 serogroup although, in Argentina, STEC of non-O157 serogroups were isolated from 40% of cases with diarrhea or HUS [89]. Chile and Uruguay also have high rates of HUS [90-91]. STEC was detected in a small number of controls in several case-control studies conducted throughout the developing world. Often, these isolates carried virulence genes or were of serotypes associated with human disease [36, 42, 72]. A study in Nigeria showed STEC were frequently isolated from children with and without diarrhea [92]. Humans may serve as an important reservoir of STEC infection in areas where asymptomatic STEC carriage is coupled with inadequate sanitation. One of the largest outbreaks in a developing country occurred in South Africa and Swaziland where contaminated water sickened thousands of people; fatalities and cases of renal failure were also reported. E. coli O157:H7 was isolated from 22.5% of 89 stools from patients [93]. Many developed countries report multiple STEC outbreaks each year; however, these are usually small, affecting tens of people or less. Large outbreaks, sickening hundreds of people, are less frequent. In 2000, an estimated 2,300 people were infected with E. coli O157:H7 due to a contaminated municipal water supply in the town of Walkerton, Ontario, Canada. Twenty-seven cases developed HUS and 7 died of STEC infection [94]. In the same year as the Walkerton outbreak, Canada reported 45 other outbreaks of E. coli O157:H7 infection. In 2006, E. coli O157:H7contaminated spinach caused 205 cases in 26 US states and in Canada, and 3 deaths [95]. In the 20-year period from 1982 to 2002, 350 outbreaks were reported in the US [96]. Although higher incidence occurs in the northern states, outbreaks were reported in 49 states affecting 8,598 people [96]. Since the 2006 spinach outbreak, several other outbreaks have been reported. A cluster of E. coli O157:H7 cases was linked to a Taco Bell fast-food outlet in the northeastern US in 2006. This outbreak had an 11% HUS rate and lettuce, cheddar cheese and beef were linked to cases [97]. Other outbreaks in the US from 2007 to 2010 have been linked to frozen beef patties, ground beef, bladetenderized steaks, pepperoni on frozen pizzas and raw cookie dough [98]. Most STEC infections in industrialized countries are sporadic. Analysis of data from FoodNet shows that outbreaks accounted for only 25.7% of E. coli O157 cases in 2008[82]. Overall, 513 E. coli O157 infections were reported resulting in an incidence of 2.12 cases per 100,000 people. Non-O157 STEC infections in 2008 totaled 205 with an incidence of 0.45 cases per 100,000 people. In children (< 18 years old), 77 cases of HUS were reported (incidence of 0.73 cases per 100,000 children). There was no significant change in the incidence of E. coli O157 infections or HUS compared to the previous three years; however, E. coli O157 infections have decreased 25% (95% confidence interval: 8%-39%) compared to the first three years of surveillance (1996-1998)[82]. The decrease in incidence since the mid-late 1990’s plateaued by the mid-2000’s, and incidence has not yet reached the target of 1.0 E. coli O157 infections per 100,000 people proposed in the CDC Healthy People by 2010 Program suggesting unresolved and/or unrecognized issues in food safety still exist[82]. Transmission of STEC is via the fecal-oral route. The infectious dose of E. coli O157:H7 is estimated to be approximately 100 organisms and is presumed to be low for non-O157 STEC [99]. This low dose and the ability of E. coli to survive a variety of conditions may contribute to the diversity of vehicles and transmission routes reported. Transmission of STEC has been reported via contaminated water, food items, person-to-person contact and animal contact. Airborne particles contaminated with E. coli O157 were implicated in one outbreak [100] and airborne transmission of E. coli O157 was demonstrated between pigs in a controlled setting [101]. Among food items implicated in STEC infections, meat, produce, milk and milk products have been reported [96, 102-103]. Produce items including sprouts, lettuce and spinach have been linked to outbreaks [96, 102-103]. Although there are many potential sources of STEC infection, cattle remain the most important reservoir. At the beef and dairy herd level, O157 is ubiquitous [104]. Small ruminants such as sheep and goats are also carriers of STEC and indirect transmission from sheep to humans was demonstrated following a Norway sausage outbreak [105-106]. Pigs were thought to only serve as a mechanical vector, but recent studies have demonstrated that pigs are competent biological reservoirs of STEC [95]. The 2006 spinach-associated outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 was likely the result of feral pigs shedding the outbreak strain onto spinach fields. The outbreak strain was also identified in cattle about

 

Evolution and Epidemiology of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 17

one mile away from the implicated fields [95]. Interestingly, STEC have a wide distribution in both food items and production animals in countries that have low STEC prevalence in humans, such as India and Brazil [87-88, 107110]. Some of the STEC from food and animals carried several genes and/or serotypes associated with human disease; however, many isolates lacked important virulence genes such as the eae gene [87, 108]. Runoff water from fecally-contaminated fields is likely responsible for contamination of drinking and recreational water [103]. Little is known about the behavior of STEC in soil and/or water but this will likely prove important to the ecology of STEC and STEC-related disease. Risk factors for sporadic STEC infection vary geographically, but in general, eating outside the home and eating undercooked beef are the most common exposures. Risk may differ for exposures depending on age. For example, Werber et al. (2007) found that transmission through food items was less of a risk in children less than 3 years of age, whereas in children over 10 years of age, only food items, such as lamb meat and raw spreadable sausage were found to be significant risk factors [111]. In general, risk factors are similar for E. coli O157 and non-O157 STEC infection; however, a study in Australia found that O157 was associated with eating hamburgers, eating out of the home and living on or visiting a farm while non-O157 infections were associated with eating chicken deli meat and working with animals [112]. A study of sporadic STEC infection in New Mexico found that those infected with nonO157 were more likely to be nonwhite, < 5 years old and urban residents compared to those infected with O157 [113]. Seasonality has been observed in both STEC infection and prevalence in cattle, both of which increase during summer months [103, 114]. E. coli O157:H7 is a highly virulent serotype and the most recognized and characterized of the STEC; however, there are 250 recognized serogroups of non-O157 STEC and over 100 of these serogroups have been associated with disease in humans, and along with flagellar antigen types, the variety of STEC serotypes is vast [115]. As the use of methods to identify non-O157 STEC becomes more widespread, non-O157 STEC serotypes are increasingly detected and approximately 19-100% of STEC-associated disease is due to non-O157 serotypes [115]. The nonO157 serotypes most associated with severe disease in humans are motile and non-motile (NM) strains of O26:H11/NM, O103:H2, O111:H8/NM, O145:H28/NM. Other emerging serotypes include O118:H16/NM, O121:H19/NM [102]. STEC that produce Stx2 are associated with severe human disease, while strains producing only Stx1 are not, although these strains are isolated from some cases of HUS and bloody diarrhea [116]. While the Stx1 gene is quite conserved, several variants of Stx2 have been identified that are associated with differences in disease severity. Stx2 and Stx2c are variants that are more frequently isolated from HUS patients, whereas patients with STEC producing Stx2d are more likely to have uncomplicated diarrhea [103]. Some Stx2 variants are mainly detected in animal strains such as Stx2e, which contributes to the pathogenesis of edema disease in pigs [117-118] and Stx2f which is found in STEC of avian origin [103]. Variants of intimin have also been identified in attaching and effacing E. coli. Although 17 intimin types have been described, the main intimin types are α, β, γ, ε [103, 119]. In general, EPEC carry α-intimin, while γ-intimin is found in STEC serogroups O157, O55 and O145. Other important STEC serogroups, O103 and O121 have the ε-intimin type, and STEC O26:H11 carry β-intimin [103]. LEE-negative (intimin-negative) serotypes, such as O113:H21, have been associated with severe disease and produce an alternate adhesin and cytotoxin [115, 120]. Epidemiology of ETEC ETEC is the most commonly isolated pathotype of DECs. It is a major cause of pediatric diarrhea which causes an estimated 1.4 million deaths per year [28, 121]. ETEC can cause cholera-like diarrhea in groups of all ages, including travelers to the developing world where ETEC is endemic. Asymptomatic carriage of ETEC in individuals of all ages is common, which provides a reservoir for cycles of infection and re-infection [28]. ETEC infection is a major cause of diarrhea in children under 2 years of age in the developing world [122]. A survey by Wenneras et al. (2004) of studies conducted between 1970 and 1999 showed high incidence of ETEC in children less than one year old (69 million diarrheal episodes per year) with 210 million episodes per year for children 1-4 years old (average 52 million episodes). Diarrhea due to ETEC infection in children less than 2 years of

 

18 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Williams et al.

age may exacerbate or result in malnourishment, potentially leading to reduced physical and/or cognitive development. ETEC is associated with diarrhea in children under 5 years, although it is estimated almost 50 million children in this age group are asymptomatic carriers [28]. Compared to younger children, 5-15 year-olds have reduced incidence (114 million cases per year for the entire age group, average of approximately 10 million cases per year) and ETEC is no longer associated with diarrhea in this older age group [28]. Although ETEC-associated diarrhea is mainly considered to affect young children, approximately 25% of ETEC cases are in adults who can experience severe dehydration compared to children [122]. ETEC is endemic in almost all developing countries with peak incidence occurring during warm and wet seasons [122]. Outbreaks of ETEC can also occur in developing countries, although clusters of ETEC-associated diarrhea have been mistaken for cholera outbreaks. Two unrelated ETEC outbreaks in the Brazilian Amazon Rainforest were originally thought to be cholera [123]. Travelers to countries where ETEC is endemic are susceptible to diarrhea due to ETEC infection. ETEC is a major cause of traveler’s diarrhea (TD) and may be responsible for 20-40% of cases [122, 124]. In a meta-analysis, Shah et al. (2009) reported that 30.4% of global TD cases are due to ETEC. The prevalence of ETEC-associated TD in different regions were similar to this global prevalence: 33.6% in Latin America, 31.2% in Africa, 30.6% in South Asia, but only 7.2% in Southeast Asia [69]. ETEC-associated diarrhea also impacts soldiers deployed to countries where ETEC is endemic; 70% of US troops experienced at least one bout of diarrhea during deployment to Iraq and ETEC was the most commonly isolated enteropathogen from these cases at a prevalence of 32% [125]. Sporadic endemic cases of ETEC diarrhea are rare in developed countries, except in communities lacking adequate water quality and sanitation; however, several food and waterborne outbreaks have been reported in the US, Japan and Europe [122]. ETEC was identified as the etiologic agent of a large food borne outbreak at a sushi restaurant in Nevada in 2004. Poor food-handling practices and infected food handlers likely contributed to this outbreak since the butterfly shrimp implicated in these outbreaks was distributed to other restaurants that were not involved in the outbreak [126]. Another ETEC outbreak in 2004 occurred at a corporate lunch in Illinois [127]. Cucumber salad and Asian crispy noodle salad were associated with diarrhea through epidemiological methods, although no food was available for testing. In general, the ETEC strain responsible for this outbreak resulted in diarrhea of longer duration (median of 7 days) compared to other reported ETEC outbreaks (median of 4 days) [127]. As with other DEC pathotypes, transmission of ETEC occurs via the fecal-oral route. Contaminated food and water are the most common sources of infection. Humans are the major reservoir of ETEC, so improved personal hygiene and sanitation capabilities (clean water and latrines) should reduce incidence of ETEC infection. Infants in low socio-economic households in the developing world are most susceptible to ETEC-associated diarrhea [122]. Breastfeeding is thought to be protective since exposure to ETEC through contaminated food and water is reduced. However, protection is limited since children are often weaned or started on solid foods at a very young age, and contaminated weaning food has been suggested as a likely source of ETEC infection in infants [122]. Risk of ETEC diarrhea in children in Brazil was associated with preparation of food (beans, rice and soup) in the morning that was fed to children in the afternoon [128]. This association suggests that improper food storage is a risk factor for ETEC diarrhea. ETEC is also a cause of serious diarrheal disease in young animals, particularly swine, cattle and rabbits, but these strains carry different toxin and colonization factors than human ETEC strains and, therefore, do not appear to have zoonotic potential [122]. ETEC strains isolated from humans are highly variable. There are 78 different serotypes and many isolates are untypeable. The most common ETEC serotypes detected in a collection of isolates representing the global diversity of ETEC were O6, O78, O8, O128 and O153 [129]. Only 34 flagellar H-antigen types were identified in this collection, five of which accounted for half the ETEC isolates [129]. A subsequent study in Egypt showed that the serotypes O43 and O159 were most prevalent and five H types also accounted for half of the Egyptian isolates, but these serotypes differed from the previous study [130]. Analysis of ETEC outbreaks occurring in the US between 1996 and 2003 found that ETEC of the serotype O169:H41 were isolated in 10/16 outbreaks and were the sole

 

Evolution and Epidemiology of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 19

serotype identified in 6 of the outbreaks [131]. Prior to 1996 only 1/21 outbreaks were due to O169:H41 ETEC. These serotypes appear to be emerging in both Japan and the US [132]. The finding of multiple lineages within a serotype goes against other studies which demonstrated that each serotype belonged to its own lineage despite some intra-serotype variation [133-134]. ETEC strains produce colonization factor antigens (CFAs) that mediate binding to the small bowel. Over 22 CFA types have been recognized and more are thought to exist. The most common types are CFA/I, coli surface antigen (CS) 1, CS2, CS3, CS4,CS5, CS6, CS7, CS14, CS17 and CS21 [10, 122]. Approximately 75% of ETEC express CFA/I, CFA/II or CFA/IV, although 30-50% of ETEC express no typeable CFA [10, 122]. This may be due to the absence of CFA or our inability to detect all types of CFA. Colonization factors, such as K88 and K99, that are expressed by ETEC of animal-origin are very different from those of ETEC isolates from humans and likely contribute to species-specificity [10, 122]. ETEC can produce each or both of the plasmid-encoded toxins, heat-labile toxin (LT) and heat-stable toxin (ST). ETEC strains producing LT only are thought to be less pathogenic than strains producing ST only or LT and ST, since LT-producing ETEC are often isolated from asymptomatic individuals [122]. Indeed, Qadri et al. (2005) reported a possible increasing trend in LT-producing ETEC strains in Bangladesh and Latin America. There are two variants of LT, LT1 and LT2. LT2 is associated with animals, while LT1 are mainly isolated from human ETEC cases. Genotyping techniques found 16 different LT1 types among 51 ETEC strains isolated from children with and without diarrhea in Brazil [135]. Considering that 16 LT types were identified in only 51 samples from one country, it is likely that significant diversity of ETEC LT1 exists. Functional differences in these LT types may account for the variations in incidence and disease severity observed among LT-producing ETEC strains. Similar to LT, ST has two major variants, STa (or STI), which is mainly associated with human disease, and STb (or STII) which is predominant in animals. STa can be further split into two subtypes, STh (or STIb) and STp (or STIa). STh were thought to mainly be found in humans, while STp were considered of porcine origin, although both STh and STp have been isolated from humans. Bölin et al. (2006) found that the distribution of the two STa subtypes varies by geographic region with equal prevalence of STh and STp among pediatric diarrhea cases in Egypt and Guatemala, but few STp-producing ETEC detected in Bangladesh. CONCLUSION Diarrhea is the second leading cause of death in children under 5 years old in the developing world. DEC strains are responsible for millions of episodes of diarrhea each year that affect children and adults worldwide. ETEC is endemic in developing countries and is the most frequently isolated bacterial pathogen from children with diarrhea, as well as from adult travelers to endemic areas. Increasing outbreaks of food and waterborne ETEC infection have been reported in the United States, many of them associated with the emerging serotype O69:H41. EPEC strains are also widespread, particularly in the developing regions. Atypical EPEC strains, lacking the bundleforming pilus, are emerging in both developing and industrialized countries and are associated with persistent diarrhea. Unlike typical EPEC, atypical EPEC strains have been isolated from a variety of animal species. The role of animals in atypical EPEC transmission is unknown, as are the factors underlying the emergence of atypical EPEC. EAEC strains have emerged as the second leading cause of travelers’ diarrhea following ETEC, and as one of the most frequently isolated DEC pathotypes in children with diarrhea. Persistent diarrhea in children has been associated with EAEC, in both developing and industrialized countries, and outbreaks affecting children and adults have been reported. EAEC are identified phenotypically by a “stacked brick” adherence pattern on cultured epithelial cells; however, EAEC strains are very diverse and a limited factor for epidemiological studies is that no genetic markers have been detected that identify all EAEC. STEC continue to be an important cause of sporadic and epidemic diarrhea and the more serious HUS in industrialized countries. STEC are present in cattle and other animal species worldwide, but are detected at low levels, if at all, in children with or without diarrhea in developing countries. The threat posed to human health by the

 

20 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Williams et al.

great diversity of E. coli strains carrying stx genes is unknown. In addition, the growing number and variety of transmission routes warrants continued surveillance of STEC in humans, animals and the environment. DEC natural history is complex and the underlying factors responsible for shifts in DEC pathotypes or strains, including loss and acquisition of mobile elements as well as anthropogenic changes, must be understood to inform effective interventions that reduce exposure to DEC and decrease the burden of disease. REFERENCES [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

[7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24]

 

Lenski RE, Barrick, J.E., Ofria, C. Balancing robustness and evolvability. PLoS Biology. 2006;4:e428. Kinnersley MA, Holben, W.E., Rosenzweig, F. E unibus plurum: Genomic analysis of an experimentally evolved polymorphism in Escherichia coli. PLos Genetics. 2009;5:e1000713. Barrick JE, Yu DS, Yoon SH, et al. Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli. Nature. 2009;461:1243-7. Serres MH, Kerr, A.R.W., McCormack, T.J., et al. Evolution by leaps: gene duplication in bacteria. Biolog Direct. 2009;4:46. Brussow H, Canchaya C, Hardt WD. Phages and the evolution of bacterial pathogens: from genomic rearrangements to lysogenic conversion. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004;68:560-602. Pupo G.M. K, D.K.R., Lan, R., Reeves, P.R. Evolutionary relationships among pathogenic and nonpathogenic Eschericia coli strains inferred from Multilocus Enzyme Electrophoresis and mdh sequence studies. Infection and Immunity. 1997;65:2685-92. Escobar-Paramo P, Clermont, O., Blanc-Potart, A-B., et al. A specific genetic background is required for acquisition and expression of virulence factors in Escherichia coli. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2004;21:1085-94. Donnenberg MS, Whittam, T.S. Pathogenesis and evolution of virulence in enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2001;107:539-48. Clarke SC. Diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli - an emerging problem? Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 2001;41:93-8. Kaper JB, Nataro, J.P., Mobley, H.L.T. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nature Rev Micro. 2004;2:123-40. Robins-Browne RM, Hartland, E.L. Advances in pediatric gastroenterology and hepatology Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. 2002;17:467-75. Berg DE, Berg CM, Sasakawa C. Bacterial transposon Tn5: evolutionary inferences. Mol Biol Evol. 1984;1:411-22. Johnson TJ, Nolan, L.K. Pathogenomics of the virulence plasmids of Escherichia coli. Micro and Molecular Biology Rev. 2009;73:750-74. Torres AG, Zhou, X., Kaper, J.B. Adherence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli strains to epithelial cells. Infection and Immunity. 2005;73:18-29. Giron JA, Ho, A.S., Schoolnik, G.K. An inducible bundle-forming pilus of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science. 1991;254:710-3. Giron JA, Ho, A.S., Schoolnik, G.K. Characterization of fimbriae produced by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriology. 1993;175:7391-403. Spears KJ, Roe, A.J., Gally, D.L. A comparison of enteropathogenic and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli pathogenesis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006;255:187-202. Schmidt H. Shiga-toxin-converting bacteriophages. Res Microbiol. 2001;152:687-95. Perna NT, Plunkett G, Burland V, et al. Genome sequence of enterohaemorrhagic Eshcherichia coli O157:H7. Nature. 2001;409:529-33. Zhou Z, Li, X., Liu, B., et al. Derivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from its O55:H7 precursor. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e8700. Wick LM, Qi, W., Lacher, D.W., Whittam, T.S. Evolution of genomic content in the stepwise emergence of Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Bacteriology. 2005;187:1783-91. Feng P, Lampel, K.A., Karch, H., Whittam, T.S. Genotypic and Phenotypic Changes in the Emergence of Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Infec Dis. 1998;1771:1750-3. Okeke IN, Nataro, J.P. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2001;1:304-13. Okeke IN, Scaletsky, I.C.A., Soars, E.H., et al. Molecular epidemiology of the iron utilization genes of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. J Clin Micro. 2004;42:36-44.

Evolution and Epidemiology of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli

[25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37]

[38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50]

 

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 21

Jenkins C, van Ijperen C, Dudley EG, et al. Use of a microarray to assess the distribution of plasmid and chromosomal virulence genes in strains of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;253:119-24. Vial PA, Robins-Browne R, Lior H, et al. Characterization of enteroadherent-aggregative Escherichia coli, a putative agent of diarrheal disease. J Infec Dis. 1988;158:70-9. Sanchez J, Holmgren J. Virulence factors, pathogenesis and vaccine protection in cholera and ETEC diarrhea. Curr Opin Immunol. 2005;17:388-98. Wenneras C, Erling V. Prevalence of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli-associated diarrhoea and carrier state in the developing world. J Health Popul Nutr. 2004;22:370-82. Mathers CD, Bernard C, Moesgaard IK, et al. Global burden of disease in 2002: data sources, methods and results. Geneva: World Health Organization 2003. Ochoa TJ, Barletta F, Contreras C, Mercado E. New insights into the epidemiology of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102:852-6. Cleary J, Lai LC, Shaw RK, et al. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells: role of bundle-forming pili (BFP), EspA filaments and intimin. Microbiology. 2004;150:527-38. Trabulsi LR, Keller R, Tardelli Gomes TA. Typical and atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:508-13. Moyo SJ, Maselle SY, Matee MI, et al. Identification of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli isolated from infants and children in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7:92. Araujo JM, Tabarelli GF, Aranda KR, et al. Typical enteroaggregative and atypical enteropathogenic types of Escherichia coli are the most prevalent diarrhea-associated pathotypes among Brazilian children. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:3396-9. Hernandes RT, Elias WP, Vieira MA, et al. An overview of atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;297:137-49. Bueris V, Sircili MP, Taddei CR, et al. Detection of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli from children with and without diarrhea in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007;102:839-44. Estrada-Garcia T, Lopez-Saucedo C, Thompson-Bonilla R, et al. Association of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli Pathotypes with infection and diarrhea among Mexican children and association of atypical Enteropathogenic E. coli with acute diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:93-8. Franzolin MR, Alves RC, Keller R, et al. Prevalence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in children with diarrhea in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2005;100:359-63. Gomes TA, Irino K, Girao DM, et al. Emerging enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains? Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:1851-5. Moreno AC, Filho AF, Gomes Tdo A, et al. Etiology of childhood diarrhea in the northeast of Brazil: significant emergent diarrheal pathogens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;66:50-7. Orlandi PP, Magalhaes GF, Matos NB, et al. Etiology of diarrheal infections in children of Porto Velho (Rondonia, Western Amazon region, Brazil). Braz J Med Biol Res. 2006;39:507-17. Paniagua GL, Monroy E, Garcia-Gonzalez O, et al. Two or more enteropathogens are associated with diarrhoea in Mexican children. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2007;6:17. Torres ME, Pirez MC, Schelotto F, et al. Etiology of children's diarrhea in Montevideo, Uruguay: associated pathogens and unusual isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:2134-9. Hedberg CW, Savarino SJ, Besser JM, et al. An outbreak of foodborne illness caused by Escherichia coli O39:NM, an agent not fitting into the existing scheme for classifying diarrheogenic E. coli. J Infect Dis. 1997;176:1625-8. Viljanen MK, Peltola T, Junnila SY, et al. Outbreak of diarrhoea due to Escherichia coli O111:B4 in schoolchildren and adults: association of Vi antigen-like reactivity. Lancet. 1990;336:831-4. Levine MM, Bergquist EJ, Nalin DR, et al. Escherichia coli strains that cause diarrhoeea but do not produce heat-labile or heat-stable enterotoxins and are non-invasive. Lancet. 1978 1978;1:1119-22. Nguyen RN, Taylor LS, Tauschek M, et al. Atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection and prolonged diarrhea in children. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:597-603. Afset JE, Bergh K, Bevanger L. High prevalence of atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) in Norwegian children with diarrhoea. J Med Microbiol. 2003;52:1015-9. Afset JE, Bevanger L, Romundstad P, et al. Association of atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) with prolonged diarrhoea. J Med Microbiol. 2004;53:1137-44. Yatsuyanagi J, Saito S, Miyajima Y, et al. Characterization of atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains harboring the astA gene that were associated with a waterborne outbreak of diarrhea in Japan. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:2033-9.

22 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

[51] [52]

[53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77]

 

Williams et al.

Yatsuyanagi J, Saito S, Sato H, et al. Characterization of enteropathogenic and enteroaggregative Escherichia coli isolated from diarrheal outbreaks. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:294-7. Carvalho VM, Gyles CL, Ziebell K, et al. Characterization of monkey enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and human typical and atypical EPEC serotype isolates from neotropical nonhuman primates. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:122534. Ishii S, Meyer KP, Sadowsky MJ. Relationship between phylogenetic groups, genotypic clusters, and virulence gene profiles of Escherichia coli strains from diverse human and animal sources. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:5703-10. Krause G, Zimmermann S, Beutin L. Investigation of domestic animals and pets as a reservoir for intimin- (eae) gene positive Escherichia coli types. Vet Microbiol. 2005;106:87-95. Moura RA, Sircili MP, Leomil L, et al. Clonal relationship among atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from different animal species and humans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:7399-408. Nakazato G, Gyles C, Ziebell K, et al. Attaching and effacing Escherichia coli isolated from dogs in Brazil: characteristics and serotypic relationship to human enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC). Vet Microbiol. 2004;101:269-77. Stephan R, Borel N, Zweifel C, et al. First isolation and further characterization of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) O157:H45 strains from cattle. BMC Microbiol. 2004;4:10. Makino S, Asakura H, Shirahata T, et al. Molecular epidemiological study of a mass outbreak caused by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli O157:H45. Microbiol Immunol. 1999;43:381-4. Oswald E, Schmidt H, Morabito S, et al. Typing of intimin genes in human and animal enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: characterization of a new intimin variant. Infect Immun. 2000;68:64-71. Farooq S, Hussain I, Mir MA, et al. Isolation of atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and Shiga toxin 1 and 2fproducing Escherichia coli from avian species in India. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009;48:692-7. Frohlicher E, Krause G, Zweifel C, et al. Characterization of attaching and effacing Escherichia coli (AEEC) isolated from pigs and sheep. BMC Microbiol. 2008;8:144. Morato EP, Leomil L, Beutin L, et al. Domestic cats constitute a natural reservoir of human enteropathogenic Escherichia coli types. Zoonoses Public Health. 2009;56:229-37. Nataro JP. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli pathogenesis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2005;21:4-8. Bhan MK, Khoshoo V, Sommerfelt H, et al. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli and Salmonella associated with nondysenteric persistent diarrhea. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1989;8:499-502. Fang GD, Lima AA, Martins CV, et al. Etiology and epidemiology of persistent diarrhea in northeastern Brazil: a hospitalbased, prospective, case-control study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1995;21:137-44. Lima AA, Guerrant RL. Persistent diarrhea in children: epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, nutritional impact, and management. Epidemiol Rev. 1992;14:222-42. Wanke CA, Schorling JB, Barrett LJ, et al. Potential role of adherence traits of Escherichia coli in persistent diarrhea in an urban Brazilian slum. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991;10:746-51. Huang DB, Mohanty A, DuPont HL, et al. A review of an emerging enteric pathogen: enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55:1303-11. Shah N, DuPont HL, Ramsey DJ. Global etiology of travelers' diarrhea: systematic review from 1973 to the present. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80:609-14. Nataro JP, Mai V, Johnson J, et al. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli infection in Baltimore, Maryland, and New Haven, Connecticut. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:402-7. Svenungsson B, Lagergren A, Ekwall E, et al. Enteropathogens in adult patients with diarrhea and healthy control subjects: a 1-year prospective study in a Swedish clinic for infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30:770-8. Ochoa TJ, Ecker L, Barletta F, et al. Age-related susceptibility to infection with diarrheagenic Escherichia coli among infants from Periurban areas in Lima, Peru. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1694-702. Itoh Y, Nagano I, Kunishima M, et al. Laboratory investigation of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli O untypeable:H10 associated with a massive outbreak of gastrointestinal illness. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:2546-50. Scavia G, Staffolani M, Fisichella S, et al. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli associated with a foodborne outbreak of gastroenteritis. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57:1141-6. Okeke IN, Nataro JP. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Lancet Infect Dis. 2001;1:304-13. Weintraub A. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli: epidemiology, virulence and detection. J Med Microbiol. 2007;56:4-8. Liberatore AMA, Tomita SK, Vieira MAM, et al. Expression of aggregative adherence to hela cells by Escherichia coli strains isolated from sick horses. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2007;38:9-13.

Evolution and Epidemiology of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli

[78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87]

[88]

[89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99]

[100] [101] [102] [103]

 

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 23

Uber AP, Trabulsi LR, Irino K, et al. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli from humans and animals differ in major phenotypical traits and virulence genes. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006;256:251-7. Nataro JP, Deng Y, Cookson S, et al. Heterogeneity of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli virulence demonstrated in volunteers. J Infect Dis. 1995;171:465-8. Pereira AL, Ferraz LR, Silva RS, et al. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli virulence markers: positive association with distinct clinical characteristics and segregation into 3 enteropathogenic E. coli serogroups. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:366-74. Riley LW, Remis RS, Helgerson SD, et al. Hemorrhagic colitis associated with a rare Escherichia coli serotype. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:681-5. Preliminary FoodNet Data on the incidence of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food--10 States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:333-7. Gould LH, Demma L, Jones TF, et al. Hemolytic uremic syndrome and death in persons with Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection, foodborne diseases active surveillance network sites, 2000-2006. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1480-5. Abba K, Sinfield R, Hart CA, et al. Pathogens associated with persistent diarrhoea in children in low and middle income countries: systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9:88. Guth BE, Lopes de Souza R, Vaz TM, et al. First Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolate from a patient with hemolytic uremic syndrome, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:535-6. Irino K, Vaz TM, Kato MA, et al. O157:H7 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains associated with sporadic cases of diarrhea in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:446-7. Vaz TM, Irino K, Nishimura LS, et al. Genetic heterogeneity of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated in Sao Paulo, Brazil, from 1976 through 2003, as revealed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:798-804. Bastos FC, Vaz TM, Irino K, et al. Phenotypic characteristics, virulence profile and genetic relatedness of O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated in Brazil and other Latin American countries. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006;265:89-97. Rivas M, Sosa-Estani S, Rangel J, et al. Risk factors for sporadic Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections in children, Argentina. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:763-71. Cordovez A, Prado V, Maggi L, et al. Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli associated with hemolytic-uremic syndrome in Chilean children. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:2153-7. Schelotto F, Varela G, Amorin MB, et al. E. coli verotoxico en el Uruguay. Relaciones Huesped - Parasito. In: Mera I, editor. I Simposio de Infectologia Pediatrica del Cono Sur; Montevideo, Uruguay 1996. p. 60-1. Okeke IN, Lamikanra A, Steinruck H, et al. Characterization of Escherichia coli strains from cases of childhood diarrhea in provincial southwestern Nigeria. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:7-12. Isaacson M, Canter PH, Effler P, et al. Haemorrhagic colitis epidemic in Africa. Lancet. 1993;341:961. Woodward DL, Clark CG, Caldeira RA, et al. Verotoxigenic Escherichia coli (VTEC): A major public health threat in Canada. Can J Infect Dis. 2002;13:321-30. Jay MT, Cooley M, Carychao D, et al. Escherichia coli O157:H7 in feral swine near spinach fields and cattle, central California coast. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1908-11. Rangel JM, Sparling PH, Crowe C, et al. Epidemiology of Escherichia coli O157:H7 outbreaks, United States, 1982-2002. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:603-9. Multistate Outbreak of E. coli O157 Infections, November-December 2006. 2006 [updated December 14, 2006; cited 2010 March 28, 2010]; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/2006/december/121406.htm. E. coli outbreak investigations. 2010 [updated March 16, 2010; cited 2010 March 28, 2010]; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/outbreaks.html. Paton AW, Ratcliff RM, Doyle RM, et al. Molecular microbiological investigation of an outbreak of hemolytic-uremic syndrome caused by dry fermented sausage contaminated with Shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:1622-7. Varma JK, Greene KD, Reller ME, et al. An outbreak of Escherichia coli O157 infection following exposure to a contaminated building. JAMA. 2003;290:2709-12. Cornick NA, Vukhac H. Indirect transmission of Escherichia coli O157:H7 occurs readily among swine but not among sheep. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:2488-91. Beutin L. Emerging enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli, causes and effects of the rise of a human pathogen. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2006;53:299-305. Caprioli A, Morabito S, Brugere H, et al. Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli: emerging issues on virulence and modes of transmission. Vet Res. 2005;36:289-311.

24 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Williams et al.

[104] Renter DG, Sargeant JM. Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157: epidemiology and ecology in bovine production environments. Anim Health Res Rev. 2002;3:83-94. [105] Schimmer B, Nygard K, Eriksen HM, et al. Outbreak of haemolytic uraemic syndrome in Norway caused by stx2-positive Escherichia coli O103:H25 traced to cured mutton sausages. BMC Infect Dis. 2008;8:41. [106] Sekse C, O'Sullivan K, Granum PE, et al. An outbreak of Escherichia coli O103:H25 - bacteriological investigations and genotyping of isolates from food. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009;133:259-64. [107] dos Santos LF, Goncalves EM, Vaz TM, et al. Distinct pathotypes of O113 Escherichia coli strains isolated from humans and animals in Brazil. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:2028-30. [108] Oliveira MG, Brito JR, Carvalho RR, et al. Water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) identified as an important reservoir of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in Brazil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:5945-8. [109] Oliveira MG, Brito JR, Gomes TA, et al. Diversity of virulence profiles of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli serotypes in food-producing animals in Brazil. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008;127:139-46. [110] Sehgal R, Kumar Y, Kumar S. Prevalence and geographical distribution of Escherichia coli O157 in India: a 10-year survey. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102:380-3. [111] Werber D, Behnke SC, Fruth A, et al. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection in Germany: different risk factors for different age groups. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:425-34. [112] McPherson M, Lalor K, Combs B, et al. Serogroup-specific risk factors for Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection in Australia. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:249-56. [113] Lathrop S, Edge K, Bareta J. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, New Mexico, USA, 2004-2007. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:1289-91. [114] Brooks JT, Sowers EG, Wells JG, et al. Non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections in the United States, 1983-2002. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:1422-9. [115] Johnson KE, Thorpe CM, Sears CL. The emerging clinical importance of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:1587-95. [116] Ostroff SM, Tarr PI, Neill MA, et al. Toxin genotypes and plasmid profiles as determinants of systemic sequelae in Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections. J Infect Dis. 1989;160:994-8. [117] MacLeod DL, Gyles CL, Valdivieso-Garcia A, et al. Physicochemical and biological properties of purified Escherichia coli Shiga-like toxin II variant. Infect Immun. 1991;59:1300-6. [118] Makino S, Watarai M, Tabuchi H, et al. Genetically modified Shiga toxin 2e (Stx2e) producing Escherichia coli is a vaccine candidate for porcine edema disease. Microb Pathog. 2001;31:1-8. [119] Blanco M, Schumacher S, Tasara T, et al. Serotypes, intimin variants and other virulence factors of eae positive Escherichia coli strains isolated from healthy cattle in Switzerland. Identification of a new intimin variant gene (eae-eta2). BMC Microbiol. 2005;5:23. [120] Bettelheim KA. The non-O157 shiga-toxigenic (verocytotoxigenic) Escherichia coli; under-rated pathogens. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2007;33:67-87. [121] Bryce J, Boschi-Pinto C, Shibuya K, et al. WHO estimates of the causes of death in children. Lancet. 2005;365:1147-52. [122] Qadri F, Svennerholm AM, Faruque AS, et al. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in developing countries: epidemiology, microbiology, clinical features, treatment, and prevention. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18:465-83. [123] Vicente AC, Teixeira LF, Iniguez-Rojas L, et al. Outbreaks of cholera-like diarrhoea caused by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in the Brazilian Amazon Rainforest. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2005;99:669-74. [124] Nataro JP, Kaper JB. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:142-201. [125] Monteville MR, Riddle MS, Baht U, et al. Incidence, etiology, and impact of diarrhea among deployed US military personnel in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75:762-7. [126] Jain S, Chen L, Dechet A, et al. An outbreak of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli associated with sushi restaurants in Nevada, 2004. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:1-7. [127] Yoder JS, Cesario S, Plotkin V, et al. Outbreak of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection with an unusually long duration of illness. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:1513-7. [128] Sobel J, Gomes TA, Ramos RT, et al. Pathogen-specific risk factors and protective factors for acute diarrheal illness in children aged 12-59 months in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:1545-51. [129] Wolf MK. Occurrence, distribution, and associations of O and H serogroups, colonization factor antigens, and toxins of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:569-84. [130] Peruski LF, Jr., Kay BA, El-Yazeed RA, et al. Phenotypic diversity of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strains from a community-based study of pediatric diarrhea in periurban Egypt. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:2974-8.

 

Evolution and Epidemiology of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 25

[131] Beatty ME, Bopp CA, Wells JG, et al. Enterotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O169:H41, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:518-21. [132] Nishikawa Y, Helander A, Ogasawara J, et al. Epidemiology and properties of heat-stable enterotoxin-producing Escherichia coli serotype O169:H41. Epidemiol Infect. 1998;121:31-42. [133] Pacheco AB, Guth BE, Soares KC, et al. Random amplification of polymorphic DNA reveals serotype-specific clonal clusters among enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from humans. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:1521-5. [134] Pacheco AB, Soares KC, de Almeida DF, et al. Clonal nature of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli serotype O6:H16 revealed by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:2099-102. [135] Lasaro MA, Rodrigues JF, Mathias-Santos C, et al. Genetic diversity of heat-labile toxin expressed by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from humans. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:2400-10.

 

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America, 2010, 25-47

25

CHAPTER 3 Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) Tânia AT Gomes1* and Bertha González-Pedrajo2 1

Departmento de Microbiologia, Imunologia, e Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; 2Departamento de Genética Molecular, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F., Mexico Abstract: Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) comprise two groups of distinct organisms classified as typical EPEC (tEPEC) and atypical EPEC (aEPEC). tEPEC were leading infantile diarrheal agents in developing countries, whereas aEPEC prevailed in developed countries. Nowadays, tEPEC are less frequent while aEPEC are emerging enteropathogens of children and adults (including HIV-infected patients) in developing countries. EPEC infections can lead to severe secretory acute and persistent diarrheal diseases. Both EPEC groups contain the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE), which encodes a Type Three Secretion System and various effector proteins that alter several signaling mechanisms of intestinal cells, leading to the development of attaching and effacing (A/E) lesions. The distinction between tEPEC and aEPEC strains is based on the expression of the bundle-forming pilus (BFP) adhesive-structure, which is restricted to tEPEC. Both EPEC groups lack the Shiga toxin genes of another A/E lesion-producing pathogen, enterohemorrhagic E. coli. aEPEC are much more heterogeneous than tEPEC in terms of phenotypic characteristics and virulence determinants. Humans are the only reservoir of tEPEC, whereas aEPEC strains may be found in humans and diverse animal species. Diagnosis is currently performed in research laboratories that use molecular methods to detect specific virulence properties that distinguish tEPEC from aEPEC strains. Antibiotics are indicated to treat more severe or persistent diarrheal cases, but resistance has been detected worldwide. Prophylactic measures are common to other diarrheal infections and vaccines based on surface or secreted proteins that were shown to induce antibodies (IgG and SIgA) responses in endemic areas are under development.

INTRODUCTION The first epidemiological studies suggesting that certain Escherichia coli strains were agents of severe childhood diarrhea were published at the end of the 19th century [reviewed in [1]]. In subsequent years, various studies suggested the involvement of certain E. coli strains of specific serogroups as agents of infantile diarrhea in Europe and the United States [reviewed in [2] and [1]]. Notwithstanding these various studies, general recognition of E. coli as agent of human diarrhea was attained by John Bray [3], who described the association of antigenically homogeneous E. coli strains with outbreaks of infantile diarrhea (“summer diarrhea”) in England. At the same period, Varela et al. [4] described the involvement of an E. coli strain (E. coli-gomez) that caused fatal diarrhea in an infant in Mexico. Subsequently, various experimental infections were published that corroborated the potential etiologic role of certain E. coli strains in diarrheal diseases [reviewed in [5]]. In 1955, Neter [6] created the term enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) to designate those E. coli strains epidemiologically associated with childhood diarrhea and to differentiate these strains from E. coli strains of the normal flora. However, although EPEC was the first diarrheagenic E. coli pathotype identified, their pathogenic potential was only confirmed and widely accepted when their ingestion by volunteers promoted evident symptoms of diarrhea [7]. Due to the epidemiological association of E. coli strains of certain serogroups and serotypes with diarrhea, until the 1970s, detection of specific serogroups (classical O groups) and serotypes was the only method available for EPEC identification and to distinguish pathogenic from non-pathogenic E. coli strains [5]. The development of molecular *Address correspondence to: Dr. Tânia A. Tardelli Gomes, Departmento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Botucatu, 862, 3º. Andar, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, S. Paulo, 04023-062, Brazil. Tel: 55-11-5083.2980; E-mail: [email protected]. Alfredo G. Torres (Ed) All rights reserved - © 2010 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

26 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Gomes and González-Pedrajo

and cellular biology techniques and of tissue culture assays has contributed a great deal of information about the virulence factors of EPEC thus allowing the use of such techniques to identify EPEC and to study their virulence mechanisms [8]. Currently, the EPEC pathotype is subdivided into typical EPEC (tEPEC) and atypical EPEC (aEPEC). This classification is based on the occurrence of the virulence-associated EAF (EPEC adherence factor) plasmid (pEAF) in tEPEC and its absence in aEPEC [9]. Both EPEC groups produce a characteristic lesion in the intestinal cells known as attaching and effacing (A/E) lesions, which result from the cooperative action of proteins encoded in a pathogenicity island named locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE). In addition, tEPEC and aEPEC strains lack the genes encoding Shiga toxins (Stx), heat-labile and heat-stable toxins, and are non-invasive [9]. Although tEPEC strains were major causative agents of acute diarrhea in very young children in developing countries (including Latin American countries) until the 1990s, there is currently a clear decrease in their frequency in many of these countries [10, 11]. In contrast, aEPEC strains, which are important agents of diarrhea in developed countries since the 1960s, are emerging agents of acute and persistent diarrhea affecting children and adults worldwide [8, 11, 12]. The main characteristics of tEPEC and aEPEC are summarized in Table 1. Table 1: Main features of typical and atypical EPEC Features

Typical EPEC

Atypical EPEC

Most common serotypes

O55:H6, O55:NM, O86:H34, O111ab:H2, O111ab:NM, O119:H6, O127:H6, O127:H40, O142:H6, O142:H34

O26:H11, O55:H7, O55:H34, O86:H8, O111ac:H9, O111:H25, O119:H2, O125ac:H6, O128ab:H2

Attaching-effacing lesion

Yes

Yes

Present

Absent

EAF plasmid (BFP expression) Stx genes

No

No

Adherence patterns a

LA

LA-like, AA, DA, LAc

LEE Region

Present

Present

Regulation

per, ler, quorum sensing

ler, quorum sensing

Reservoir

Humans

Humans, animals

a

Adherence pattern in HeLa/HEp-2 cell: LA, localized adherence; LAL, localized adherence-like; DA, diffuse adherence; AA, aggregative adherence.

b

NM, non-motile.

c

The LA phenotype in aEPEC strains is independent of BFP expression and usually is detected in prolonged assays (6 h).

SEROTYPES In 1987, the World Health Organization [13] defined EPEC as E. coli strains belonging to 12 different O groups also known as classic serogroups: O26, O55, O86, O111, O114, O119, O125, O126, O127, O128, O142, and O158. It is currently known that some serotypes within these serogroups may comprise both typical and atypical EPEC strains, as well as other diarrheagenic pathotypes [14, 15]. The most frequent serotypes among tEPEC strains of the classic serogroups are O55:H6, O55:NM (non-motile), O86:H34, O111ab:H2, O111ab:NM, O119:H6, O127:H6, O127:H40, O142:H6, and O142:H34. Most of these serotypes correspond to genetically related clones, when studied by Multilocus Enzyme Electrophoresis (MLEE) and other molecular methods [11, 14]. However, the frequency of these serotypes has changed over the years and some tEPEC serotypes belonging to non-classical EPEC serogroups have now been identified, e.g. O88:H25, and O145:H45 [16]. Regarding aEPEC strains, various epidemiological studies conducted in different geographic areas have reported a large antigenic diversity with at least 109 different serogroups (mostly non-EPEC serogroups) and more than 200 different H types [reviewed in [12]]. The most frequent aEPEC serogroups are O26, O51, O55, O111, O145, and O119, whereas the most frequent serotypes are O26:H11, O55:H7, O55:H34, O86:H8, O111ac:H9, O111:H25, O119:H2, O125ac:H6, and O128ab:H2 [12, 17]. A considerable number of aEPEC strains are O and/or H nontypable and many are non-motile.

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC)

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 27

PATHOGENESIS After passing through the gastric barrier, EPEC adhere to the mucosa of the small and large intestines, determining complex alterations that lead to diarrhea. The colonization process is proposed to occur in three phases [8]. The first phase is superficial and non-intimate and the factors that mediate initial adherence have not been definitively characterized, but some studies report the possible involvement of a type IV fimbriae named bundle forming pilus (BFP), other less characterized fimbrial and afimbrial structures, as well as the flagella, thus indicating that this phenomenon is multifactorial [18, 19]. After initial adherence, a type III secretion system (T3SS) is mounted and various effector proteins are injected, whose signaling effects promote diverse alterations in the host epithelium. Finally, there is an intimate adherence that culminates with the A/E lesion. Morphologically, the A/E lesion includes the effacing of the intestinal microvilli and the formation of actin-rich pedestal-like structures on which EPEC bacteria rest (Fig.1). In severe infections, there is complete destruction of the intestinal absorptive epithelium, with marked villous atrophy and thinning of the mucosal layer. This lesion could explain the diarrhea presented by infants due to the extensive destruction of intestinal microvilli, but there are currently many evidences that other factors participate in the process of diarrhea like alterations in the transport of ions and water, opening of the tight junctions and mucosal inflammation [19].  

 

mv PY

Figure 1: Attaching-effacing lesions in rabbit ileum infected with atypical enteropathogenic E. coli showing effacement of microvilli (mv) and pedestals (arrows) (Bar 26 μm).

MECHANISMS AND VIRULENCE FACTORS INVOLVED IN THE INTERACTION OF EPEC WITH HOST CELLS Adherence The tEPEC strains produce the so called localized adherence (LA) pattern to HeLa/HEp-2 cell surfaces after 3 h of contact [20], which reflects the formation of compact microcolonies on cell surfaces mediated by BFP [21]. These fimbriae also promote and stabilize bacterial interconnection within the microcolonies (Fig. 2A) [21]. Microcolony formation is also observed in natural infected children, and in ex vivo human biopsies [22], reviewed in [23]]. In contrast, the majority of aEPEC strains produce a modified LA pattern termed LA-like (LAL) [24] or poor LA [25], in which loosen clusters of bacteria are observed in fewer cells. Usually, the establishment of LAL is slower requiring prolonged incubation periods (6 h assays) (Fig. 2B). While the LAL pattern is characteristic of the strains of most aEPEC serotypes [26-32], some aEPEC strains express alternative adherence patterns in vitro, such as diffuse adherence (DA) (Fig. 2C) or aggregative adherence (AA) (Fig. 2D) [26, 27, 32-34]. Some tEPEC strains were shown to produce biofilms on a flow through continuous culture system, and a model of EPEC biofilm formation has been proposed [35]. Using several EPEC isogenic mutants to form biofilms, it was shown that adhesins such as BFP and the EspA filament of the T3SS were involved in bacterial aggregation during biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces. Whether biofilms are involved in the virulence of EPEC remains to be established.

28 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Gomes and González-Pedrajo

A

C

B

D

Figure 2: Patterns of adherence to HeLa cells of typical and atypical enteropathogenic E. coli. A. Localized adherence, B. Localized adherence-like; C. Aggregative adherence; D. Diffuse adherence. Microscopic magnitude: 1,000 x.

Adhesins BFP

BFP, the first virulence factor to be identified in pEAF [21], is encoded by the bfp operon which comprises 14 genes (mostly related to its biogenesis), of which the first, bfpA, encodes the pilin protein named bundlin [[36, 37] reviewed in [17]]. The rope-like filaments of BFP interconnect EPEC bacteria into microcolonies to promote non-intimate bacterial adhesion of EPEC to enterocytes in the small bowel and are also involved in dispersion of the bacteria through the intestinal mucosa [38-41]. BFP probably mediates the initial attachment by binding to N-acetyl-lactosamine-containing or to similar receptors on host cell surfaces [42]. The contribution of BFP to the virulence of EPEC has been established by studies in volunteers who ingested EPEC strains carrying mutations in genes of the bfp operon and had much less severe diarrhea than the individuals that received the wild type strain [43]. Intimin Intimin is required for intimate bacterial adhesion to epithelial cells and cytoskeletal reshuffling [[44], reviewed in [17]]. It is an outer membrane protein of 94 kDa with a high variability in amino acid composition at its C-terminal domain (280-amino acid C-terminal sequence Int280). The highly conserved intimin N-terminal domain is inserted in the bacterial outer membrane, whereas the extracellular C-terminal adhesive domain is exposed to the environment [45]. Based on subtle differences at the nucleotide sequence of the C-terminal portion of the molecule, more than 27 intimin subtypes have been described [46-51]. These subtypes were named with Greek letters, being the alpha and beta types more common among tEPEC, whereas intimin subtypes alpha, beta, gamma, zeta, delta, and epsilon appear to be the most frequent among aEPEC strains of different serotypes worldwide [28, 48, 52]. Usually most tEPEC strains of a certain serotype carry the same intimin subtype, [11] whereas not all aEPEC serotypes have the same intimin subtype. For instance, while aEPEC strains of serotype O51:H40 isolated in Brazil and in Spain possess intimin subtype theta [48, 53], certain aEPEC serotypes carry different intimin sub-types, e.g., O80:H26 carrying either intimin subtype beta or epsilon [48, 52]. The exposed variable portion of the intimin molecule connects to its receptor protein Tir (translocated intimin receptor), which is translocated into the cytosol of the targeted eukaryotic cell through a T3SS. After its translocation, Tir is inserted in the plasma membrane exposing its middle portion at the cell surface as a loop. Intimin interacts with this loop region, inducing clustering of adjacent Tir molecules whereas the amino- and carboxy- portions of Tir are exposed to the cytosol [54].

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC)

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 29

The Tir C-terminal domain is phosphorylated on its Y474 residue and triggers actin polymerization in tEPEC strains while Tir of enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) strains are non-phosphorylated and employ other effector proteins for the same function. In addition, it has been demonstrated that aEPEC strains may carry either phosphorylated or non-phosphorylated Tir molecules [reviewed in [55]]. Although the host tissue distribution of EPEC strains is probably multifactorial, some in vitro studies suggest that different intimin subtypes can determine tropism for different intestinal sites (sites of preferential adhesion) [56]. Thus, intimin subtyping may yield important information concerning tissue tropism [reviewed in [17]]. EFA/LIF Lymphocyte inhibitory factor (LifA) is a very large surface protein described in tEPEC strains, which inhibits proliferation of mitogen-activated lymphocytes and the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines [57]. Efa1 (EHEC factor adhesin 1) was first described as a potential adhesin in some EHEC strains [58]. The lifA and efa1 genes are almost identical [58] and are located in a pathogenicity island named O island 122 (OI-122). Besides efa1/lifA, PAI O122 comprises other putative virulence genes: sen, pagC, nleB and nleE [59]. Efa1/LifA seems to contribute to EPEC adherence to epithelial cells in the absence of BFP, and is critical for intestinal colonization by Citrobacter rodentium, an A/E lesion-producing bacterial murine pathogen [60]. There is evidence indicating that efa1/lifA encodes a critical protein product that regulates bacterial colonization, crypt cell proliferation, and epithelial cell regeneration during in vivo colonization [60]. Although Efa1/LifA has been implicated in the attachment of aEPEC strains to host cells [61], its association with diarrheal diseases is controversial [33, 62]. In a recent study in Brazil, the efa1/lifA gene was found to be more frequent among tEPEC (62%) than among aEPEC (30%) strains [63]. However, although tEPEC and aEPEC strains may harbor complete and incomplete PAI O122, a strong association between the presence of a complete PAI O122 (with simultaneous occurrence of efa1/lifA, sen, pagC, nleB and nleE) and diarrhea was observed only in aEPEC. This observation led the authors to suggest that the detection of complete PAI O122 could help to identify potential more pathogenic aEPEC strains [63]. Other Adhesins The complete genomic sequence of tEPEC prototype strain E2348/69, which has been recently published, revealed the presence of eight intact and five incomplete fimbrial operons as well as ten regions encoding putative nonfimbrial adhesins [64]. However, among the intact operon products identified, thus far only BFP were confirmed to play a role in microcolony formation in vitro [21] and diarrhea in human volunteers [43]. Other fimbriae encoded by tEPEC strain E2348/69 include the type 1 fimbriae, but mutants in these fimbriae showed no interference with in vitro adherence [reviewed in [17]]. In addition, EPEC E2348/69 also has conserved fimbrial genes encoding homologs of the long polar fimbriae (LPF) [65]. LPF were originally identified in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and were shown to direct the attachment of this organism to murine Peyer's patches in vivo [66]. These fimbriae also mediate microcolony formation contributing to the colonization by EHEC O157:H7 in some animal models [67]. In tEPEC, the lpf region (lpfABCDE) encodes predicted proteins with about 60% homology to the Salmonella LPF, but initial studies have indicated that LPF is apparently not necessary for adherence and A/E lesion formation on human biopsies as these functions were unaltered in an EPEC strain E2348/69 lacking the lpf gene cluster [65]. In fact, mutations in one or both of the known lpf loci (lpfA1 and lpfA2) in EHEC O157:H7 were shown to diminish colonization in animal models and to display an altered human intestinal tissue tropism [68, 69]. A number of polymorphisms within the lpfA genes have been recently identified and were used to classify distinct variants based on these major fimbrial subunit genes of EPEC and Shiga toxin producing E. coli strains (STEC) [70]. Both tEPEC and aEPEC strains were found to carry different lpfA variants. Among the tEPEC strains, the majority possessed only one of the two lpfA genes whereas most of the aEPEC strains possessed the lpfA1-2 and lpfA2-1 genes in combination with specific intimin alleles [71]. Recently, it was demonstrated that the E. coli common pilus (ECP), which is present in most E. coli isolates, may act in concert with BFP to stabilize interactions between EPEC and host cells [72]. However, the prevalence and significance of ECP to aEPEC pathogenesis has yet to be determined. In addition, the EspA filament of T3SS has

30 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Gomes and González-Pedrajo

been proposed to be the adhesin mediating initial adherence by EPEC strains that lack BFP [38] but the initial adherence of aEPEC strains may probably be multifactorial. As mentioned previously, some aEPEC strains may express the diffuse adherence (DA) or aggregative adherence (AA) patterns in vitro. In some aEPEC strains DA is a consequence of the expression of daa and afa operons, which encode adhesins of the Dr family [73, 74]. A non-fimbrial structure conferring the DA phenotype to tissue culture cells in some aEPEC strains belonging to serotype O26:H11 has been described, despite the fact that this strain exhibited a LA pattern similar to the BFP-mediated LA. This structure is encoded by the chromosomal region designated Locus for Diffuse Adherence (LDA) [75], and its expression is induced by bile salts [76]. The minor structural subunit gene of this adhesin, ldaH, was found in few aEPEC strains of serogroups O5, O26, O111 and O145 [75], but its role in virulence of these aEPEC strains remains to be evaluated. In addition, aEPEC strains of serotype O125ac:H6 express AA in HEp-2 cells but lack EAEC-virulence-associated adhesins; the AA shown by aEPEC strains of this serotype was shown to be mediated by an outer membrane protein [15, 77]. Flagella Flagella contribute to the virulence of various pathogenic bacteria through motility, chemotaxis, and stimulation of IL-8 production in eukaryotic cells. Furthermore, in some species flagella were shown to promote adhesion to and invasion of host surfaces [78]. Some flagellar antigen types, such as H2 and H6 have been consistently identified among EPEC strains isolated in various epidemiological studies worldwide. However, conflicting data exist in the literature regarding the involvement of flagella in EPEC virulence, especially as an adhesin. Girón et al. [79] demonstrated that H2 and H6 flagella purified from tEPEC but not H7 flagella purified from EHEC O157:H7 bound to HeLa cells. In addition, flagella mutants of tEPEC strains were shown to be impaired in adherence and microcolony formation thus corroborating that flagella may mediate adhesion on cultured enterocytes in vitro [79]. However, another study could not confirm a role of flagella in adherence [38]. Studying a selected aEPEC strain (1711-4) of serotype O51:H40, the most prevalent aEPEC serotype in Brazil, Sampaio et al. [80] demonstrated that flagella was involved in aEPEC 1711-4 adhesion to and invasion of polarized intestinal cells (Caco-2 and T84 cells) in vitro as an isogenic aEPEC mutant unable to produce flagellin (the protein subunit of the flagellar filament) had a marked decrease in the ability to adhere and invade those cell lineages. Signaling Events Type Three Secretion System As mentioned previously, EPEC virulence and A/E lesion development are conferred by the chromosomal LEE pathogenicity island, which encodes a T3SS [81, 82]. T3SSs are used by many Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria to deliver effector proteins straight into eukaryotic cells, subverting different host cellular processes [83, 84]. The virulence-associated T3SS also known as the ‘injectisome’, assembles into a complex macromolecular structure of more than 20 different proteins that traverses the bacterial cell envelope [84-86]. It is composed of a multi-ring base that spans both membranes, and extends a needle-like projection that protrudes out of the cell from the bacterial surface [87-89]. In addition, a hydrophilic protein forms a tip complex at the distal end of the needle, and serves as an assembly platform for two hydrophobic pore-forming translocator proteins that form a pore in the host cell membrane [90, 91]. Effectors are thought to be transported through the hollow needle directly into the cytoplasm of the target cell through the translocation pore [89, 90]. The injectisome is closely related to the bacterial flagellar export apparatus [83, 92]. The needle complex shares structural resemblance with the flagella basal body and a high degree of sequence similarity exists among eight proteins of their secretion apparatus [84, 93]. Moreover, phylogenetic studies indicate that both structures derived from a common evolutionary ancestor [94]. The T3SS in EPEC is composed of a cylindrical basal structure with two sets of membrane ring complexes joined by a periplasmic central rod (Fig. 3) [95]. The outer membrane ring is composed of the EscC protein, a member of the secretin family, which forms a channel for the delivery of large molecules through the outer membrane [96, 97]. Recently, the crystal structure of the periplasmic domain of EscC was solved and a homomultimeric ring-model of

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC)

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 31

12 subunits was constructed [98]. The inner membrane ring predicted to be associated to the outer leaflet of the inner membrane, is formed by the lipoprotein EscJ that oligomerizes into a 24-subunit ring structure [99]. The EscD protein is also predicted to form a ring-like structure in the inner membrane and EscI is believed to form the inner rod [100]. In addition, several integral and associated inner membrane proteins form the export apparatus essential for protein secretion. Among these, five polytopic membrane proteins EscR, EscS, EscT, EscU and EscV, extensively conserved among different T3SSs and with the flagellar export apparatus, are proposed to be localized within a membrane patch in the center of the inner membrane ring [101, 102]. However, the precise function and localization of these proteins within the secretion apparatus is still unknown. Structural data is available for the Cterminal cytoplasmic domain of EscU, a member of the SpaS/YscU/FlhB family of proteins that undergo autocleavage and form part of a molecular switch that regulates a substrate secretion hierarchy [103]. HM EspD/B

EspA

EscC

EscF OM

Escl

EscJ

EscQ

EscD EscL

PG IM

EscU,R,S,T,V EscN

Chaperone-effector complex

Figure 3: Schematic representation of the injectisome from EPEC. Proteins are represented according to what is known for the EPEC T3SS (see the text), and for their orthologues in other virulence as well as the flagellar T3SSs [92, 98, 102, 104, 105]. As shown, the inner membrane component EscR interacts with EscU and EscS; EscD interacts with EscC (interaction not depicted in the figure) [106]. We have shown interactions between EscN-EscL and EscN-EscQ (González-Pedrajo B., et al. unpublished results). HM, host membrane; OM, outer membrane; PG, peptidoglycan; IM, inner membrane.

A fundamental component of all T3SSs is a highly conserved ATPase EscN/InvC/YscN/FliI that shares sequence similarity with the catalytic β subunit of the F0F1-ATPases and serves to energize the secretion process [107, 108]. It provides a docking interface for chaperone-effector complexes and induces chaperone release and unfolding of the secreted protein in an ATP-dependent manner [109-111]. EscN is the ATPase associated with the T3SS in EPEC and it is essential for the virulence of this bacterial pathogen [97, 112]. High resolution structural data were obtained for the catalytic domain of EscN and a hexameric ring model was built using the F1-ATPase coordinates [113]. The extracellular portion of the injectisome is formed by a needle-like extension which is a helical homopolymer of EscF subunits [87]. Furthermore, EPEC and other A/E pathogens possess a unique T3SS that has a filamentous extension, called the EspA filament, which extends from the needle and is thought to facilitate attachment to the host cells through the thick mucus layer [87, 114, 115]. A central channel within this structure appears to function as a conduit for the translocation of effector proteins into enterocyte cells [116, 117]. Finally, EspB and EspD are secreted by the T3SS in EPEC and form the translocation pore in the intestinal cell [118]. The assembly of the T3SS is a highly regulated process. It has been shown that protein secretion is induced in response to conditions similar to the ones found in the gastrointestinal tract [119]. The T3S proteins SepD and SepL constitute a molecular switch that controls the ordered secretion of translocators (EspA, EspB and EspD) and effector molecules, possibly in response to environmental cues such as low calcium concentrations [120]. This regulatory mechanism is used by A/E pathogens to ensure that translocators are secreted prior to effectors [120-122].

32 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Gomes and González-Pedrajo

LEE and Non-LEE Encoded Effectors Genome sequence analysis of the prototype typical strain E2348/69 revealed the existence of 21 T3SS effector genes carried on lambda-like prophages and integrative elements [64]. Seven of the effectors translocated through the T3SS are encoded within the LEE PAI (Tir, Map, EspB, EspF, EspH, EspZ and EspG), while the others are scattered throughout the chromosome and are referred to as non-LEE-encoded effectors (Nle) [[122] reviewed in [123]]. Translocated LEE effectors subvert normal host cell functions and are responsible for the formation of the A/E lesion (effacement of absorptive microvilli and induction of pedestals); and with the exception of EspZ [124], all have proven deleterious effects on the host cell [123]. The first LEE effector to be characterized was Tir; with Tirintimin interaction being essential for pedestal formation [54]. In addition to promoting intimate attachment, actin polimerization and cytoskeletal rearrangements, the Tir-intimin interaction also triggers phosphorylation of a host phospholipase [125], facilitates invasion of non-phagocytic cells [126] and downregulates the EPEC-mediated filopodia formation [127]. Tir is also involved in tight junction (TJ) disruption [123]. The contribution of the LEE effectors in the disease process has been studied in animal infection models using EHEC and Citrobacter, indicating that Tir is essential while the other effectors have a smaller contribution to virulence [123]. Many of the EPEC translocated effectors have multiple functions and the ability to cooperate with one another (reviewed by [128, 129]. Map (Mithochondrial-associated protein) is targeted to the mitochondria affecting its structure and function [130], it induces transient filopodia formation [127], and is essential for disruption of intestinal barrier function and alteration of TJ structure [131]. More recently, Map was shown to act as a guaninenucleotide exchange factor regulating actin dynamics [132]. EspF, another multifunctional effector is also targeted to the host mitochondria initiating the mitochondrial death pathway [133]. It has a role in disrupting the intestinal barrier function [134], remodeling of the brush border microvilli [135], and redistribution of TJ proteins [136]. Additionally, EspF has been implicated in cell death via apoptosis [137] and in inhibition of phagocytosis [138]. EspG and its Nle homolog EspG2 have been shown to trigger actin stress fiber formation and the destruction of the microtubule networks beneath adherent bacteria [70, 139, 140]. More recently, it was demonstrated that both EspG and EspG2, play a role in the inhibition of intestinal membrane chloride transport [141], and that they activate the host cysteine protease calpain during EPEC infection, leading to host cell loss and necrosis [142]. The effector EspH localizes to the host cell membrane and is a modulator of the host actin cytoskeleton structure [143]. EspH, Tir, and Map collaborate to organize the assembly and disassembly of actin filopodia and pedestals [127]. Recently, it has been shown that EspH counteracts macrophage phagocytosis by binding to RhoGEFs, inactivating the host Rho GTPase signalling pathway [144]. EspZ (previously SepZ) is the translocated effector most recently identified that can be detected beneath the site of bacterial attachment [124]. A function has recently been identified for this effector, it was demonstrated that it interacts with the host protein CD98, enhancing phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), and promoting host cell survival mechanisms during infection [145]. EspB, which is also a translocator protein essential for the delivery of effectors, acts as an effector modulating the host cell cytoskeleton [146]. It also participates in microvilli effacement and in preventing phagocytosis [147]. Non-LEE effectors also have roles in EPEC virulence, although relatively little is known about their cellular function [148]. Since the major EPEC virulence properties have been attributed to the LEE effectors, the non-LEE effectors are proposed to function as accessory factors for an efficient infection [reviewed in [123]]. In contrast to the LEE-encoded effectors that are conserved among all the A/E pathogens, there is a considerable variation in the repertoire of non-LEE effector proteins between strains [64]. To state some of their functions, NleA is reported to inhibit protein trafficking [149] and to disrupt TJs [150]. NleB has been associated with diarrheal disease due to aEPEC [62]. NleE participates in the induction of the signaling pathways required for polymorphonuclear leukocytes transepithelial migration, and it has been demonstrated that it is capable of inhibiting NF-kappaB activation [151, 152]. NleH has anti apoptotic activity during EPEC infection [153]. As previously mentioned, EspG2 has functional redundancy with EspG, indicating that LEE and non-LEE effectors can function together to alter specific cellular processes [140, 154]. EspJ is involved in inhibition of receptor-mediated phagocytosis [155], and the cyclomodulin Cif induces apoptosis [156]. Several other Nle proteins have been identified but their function is still unknown. Most effectors require chaperone proteins for efficient translocation into host cells [157]. T3S chaperones typically form homodimers that interact with their cognate effector through a chaperone-binding domain located within the

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC)

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 33

first 100 amino acids of the effector protein. It has been proposed that chaperones promote translocation by stabilizing the effectors in the cytoplasm, maintaining them in a secretion-competent conformation, masking their cellular localization or ‘toxic’ domains, regulating their synthesis, and by targeting them to the secretion apparatus [84, 157]. In EPEC two effector chaperones have been identified. CesF, which binds to EspF [158], and CesT, which was initially shown to bind and stabilize Tir and Map [159-161]; however, additional studies have demonstrated interactions with multiple LEE and non-LEE effectors [162, 163]. The participation of these chaperones in establishing a hierarchal translocation of effectors has also been demonstrated [162, 164]. Autotransporters EPEC also encodes virulence-associated proteins that are secreted via a type V secretion mechanism [reviewed in [165]]. EspC is the most studied autotransporter protein in this bacterial pathogen. It has a conserved serine protease motif similar to the IgA protease and has been shown to have enterotoxic activity [166, 167]. In addition, it has been demonstrated that EspC produces epithelial damage on HEp-2 cells [168] and that it proteolyses hemoglobin [169]. Recently, it was shown that EspC internalization into host cells is also dependent on the T3SS, suggesting cooperation between two secretion systems [170]. Two other putative autotransporter proteins have been identified in the genome sequence of the prototype strain E2348/69, but their function is still unknown [64]. Regulation The LEE contains 41 genes organized in five major polycistronic operons (LEE1 to LEE5) and several smaller transcriptional units, which are positively regulated by Ler, a key transcriptional regulator of EPEC virulence encoded by the first gene of the LEE1 operon [reviewed in [171]]. Ler regulates LEE gene expression by counteracting the repression imposed by the global regulator H-NS [172]. In addition, two other LEE-encoded transcriptional regulators have been identified, GrlA and GrlR, that have positive and negative roles in ler expression, respectively [122, 173, 174]. Moreover, in tEPEC strains, the EAF plasmid-encoded regulator PerC also plays a role in ler positive regulation, linking the expression of BFP with the expression of the LEE [172, 175, 176]. Additionally, in EPEC and EHEC, Ler also regulates non-LEE encoded virulence factors e.g., espC, nleA and lpf, so it is considered a global regulator of EPEC virulence [68, 177-179]. Invasion Some in vivo studies have shown the presence of EPEC cells inside human enterocytes [22, 180, 181] and different cell lines in vitro [182-185]. However, despite these evidences, invasiveness has not been considered a pathogenic characteristic of tEPEC strains in vivo and strains in this pathotype have been considered extracellular pathogens [8]. Studies conducted to evaluate the invasive ability of aEPEC strains are somewhat controversial. Former studies with some collections of aEPEC strains have shown that these strains invade HEp-2 cells less efficiently than tEPEC prototype E2348/69 [30] or rarely invade these cells [33]. In contrast other studies have shown that some aEPEC strains invade epithelial cells efficiently [50, 80, 186, 187]. Scaletsky et al. [188] reported a case of persistent diarrhea caused by an aEPEC (O18ab) strain that invaded HeLa and rabbit intestinal cells as observed by transmission electron microscopy. In addition, Rosa et al. [186] and Yamamoto et al. [50] have shown that a subset of aEPEC strains are able to invade undifferentiated intestinal Caco2 cells more efficiently than differentiated cells of the same lineage suggesting that undifferentiated cells express basolateral receptors necessary for aEPEC invasion. Hernandes et al. [187] showed that an aEPEC strain of serotype ONT:NM invaded HeLa cells as a result of intimin-Tir interaction with the subsequent cytoskeleton reorganization, as an eae mutant of this strain remained adherent but was no longer invasive. Furthermore, Bulgin et al. [189] showed that EspT, a T3SS-dependent effector protein belonging to the WXXXE family of effector proteins, promoted invasion of non-phagocytic cells by the trigger mechanism. The pathogenic role of the invasive ability of some aEPEC strains is presently unknown. As invasive organisms may be protected from destruction by the immune system and some antibiotics that do not penetrate eukaryotic cells, invasion could contribute to the permanence of certain aEPEC strains in the intestine, resulting in the persistent diarrhea reported in recent studies [190, 191].

34 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Gomes and González-Pedrajo

Induction of Mucus hypersecretion A putative new virulence phenomenon has been recently described with two aEPEC strains isolated from diarrheic children in Brazil, which consisted of induction of mucus hypersecretion in rabbit ligated ileal loops and in cultured human mucin-secreting intestinal HT29-MTX cells [192]. The same phenomenon could not be observed with tEPEC strain E2348/69 tested in the same conditions. Mucus hypersecretion was associated with increased production of secreted MUC2 and MUC5AC mucins and membrane-bound MUC3 and MUC4 mucins after infection of HT29MTX cells by an unidentified non-secreted effector molecule. Interestingly, adhering aEPEC cells grew in the presence of membrane-bound mucins, thus exploiting the mucins increased production for its own growth benefit. It is currently not known whether mucus hypersecretion is a virulence mechanism used by aEPEC strains to infect the human host. Furthermore, it remains to be investigated how frequent this property can be found among aEPEC strains. DIVERSITY OF VIRULENCE PROPERTIES The tEPEC strains are generally more homogeneous in their virulence characteristics, expressing the LEE- and the EAF plasmid-virulence genes [11]. Conversely, besides the genes on the LEE, many aEPEC strains carry genes encoding virulence factors of other E. coli pathotypes (even from extra-intestinal pathogenic E. coli) in different combinations [11, 26, 28, 32, 77], reflecting the heterogeneity of the group. However the role of these genes or different genes combinations in aEPEC pathogenesis is unknown. It is also recognized that some tEPEC and EHEC strains may loose pEAF or the stx-encoding phages during infection, respectively, thus generating E. coli isolates devoid of these genes, which would be diagnosed as an aEPEC isolate [193, 194]. Using DNA microarray analyses to search for genes associated with diarrhea, Afset et al. [62] found that the genes present in PAI O122 (efa1/lifA, set/ent, nleB and nleE) and certain genes located outside this PAI (lpfA, paa, ehxA and ureD) were associated with diarrhea but these associations may vary among different serotypes and in distinct geographic areas. It is apparent that aEPEC is more likely than tEPEC to receive virulence genes by horizontal transmission (i.e., from transmissible plasmids, PAIs, transposons or bacteriophages) in the intestine and/or environment. Lacher et al. [195] showed that EPEC strains are spread in four main clusters: EPEC 1 containing only tEPEC strains with H6 flagellar antigen, EPEC 2 containing tEPEC and aEPEC carrying H2 antigen, EPEC 3 including tEPEC and aEPEC with H34 antigen and EPEC 4 comprising tEPEC and aEPEC with H6 antigen. Bando et al. [196] have combined data generated by MLST and presence of pathogenic E. coli virulence factor-encoding genes to make a phylogenetic analysis of a collection of EPEC strains with other diarrheagenic E. coli pathotypes. With this approach, they showed that tEPEC and aEPEC of the classical EPEC serogroups were distributed on clusters that closely correlated with these clonal groups. However, they have also shown that aEPEC strains are distributed in all E. coli phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2 and D) with at least two main distinct genomic backgrounds (named Clusters I and III). According to these authors, the acquisition and expression of virulence factors derived from non-EPEC pathotypes by various aEPEC clonal groups could be due to their particular genomic background, with Clusters I and III being associated with severe and mild diarrhea, respectively. EPIDEMIOLOGY AND IMPACT IN LATIN AMERICA For many decades, studies conducted worldwide have shown that tEPEC serotypes were strongly associated with diarrhea in children <1 year of age, mainly in poor children of urban centers in the first six months of life [reviewed in [8]]. In this age group, these serotypes were considered the main cause of endemic diarrhea in developing countries, including Latin America [197-200]. The frequency of tEPEC serotypes in children older than one year of age were reported to diminish with increasing age and adults rarely contracted EPEC infections, except under exceptional conditions [8]. The increased resistance in older children and adults was credited to the development of immunity or the loss of receptors for some specific adhesin [8]. In developed countries, there was a significant decrease in the frequency of tEPEC since the 1960s, and after that period, these bacteria were rarely detected in these countries, whereas aEPEC are frequently found in diarrheic patients [191, 201] reviewed in [1, 8]. In some developing countries, such decrease in the frequency of tEPEC strains has also been detected in recent years [11, 202-207]. The reasons for such decrease probably comprise better control of hospital infections, improvements in therapy, sanitation measures and in nutrition of infants [11].

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC)

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 35

The epidemiology of aEPEC strains worldwide has been recently reviewed [12, 203]. It is noticeable that this pathotype has shown a more significant role in diarrhea in developing countries [205, 206, 208]. In many of these studies the frequency of aEPEC strains in both diarrheic and non-diarrheic individuals are similar, thus strong association of aEPEC serotypes with endemic diarrhea has yet to be demonstrated. Even so, aEPEC strains have been found in diarrheic patients of various ages and in adult patients with HIV-AIDS [28]. Moreover, some serotypes have been incriminated as agents of diarrheal outbreaks, but thus far no outbreaks due to aEPEC have been reported in Latin America. A large outbreak caused by serotype O111:H9 was described in Finland involving more than 600 people [209] while in the U.S.A. an outbreak due to an aEPEC of serotype O39:NM involved more than 100 adults [210]. Another outbreak associated with aEPEC was described in infants at a daycare center in Japan, in which four aEPEC isolates of serotype O55:NM with identical Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis patterns were detected in four patients [211]. In addition, a waterborne diarrheal outbreak affected students between 12 and 15 years old in Japan [211]; seven of 41 diarrheic individuals carried aEPEC isolates of serotype ONT:H45. RESERVOIRS AND TRANSMISSION Thus far, studies have shown that tEPEC are rarely found in animals and their reservoirs comprise only humans [11]. Many children acquire infection in public hospitals, usually by contact with other patients hospitalized with diarrhea. Although not completely characterized, it is apparent that tEPEC may be transmitted by ingestion of contaminated food and water [212]. The substitution of bottle feeding for breast-feeding enhances the risk of contracting diarrhea [212].

In contrast, various reports have described the isolation of aEPEC strains from various healthy and diarrheic animal species, such as cattle, sheep, goat, pig and poultry, as well as in domestic animals, deers and marmosets [reviewed in [12]]. Although there is no evidence of direct transmission from animals to humans, some aEPEC strains isolated from animals belong to serogroups implicated in human diseases, for example, O26, O103, O119, O128 and O142 [reviewed in [12]], suggesting that these animals may represent important reservoirs of aEPEC, which can be transmitted to humans. CLINICAL ASPECTS Diarrhea due to EPEC varies from a fatal to a subclinical infection, probably depending on host factors [8]. Various studies have shown that tEPEC strains can induce abundant secretory diarrhea with mucus (but without blood) with important losses of fluid and electrolyte in feces. Vomiting and low-grade fever are also observed in EPEC-infected patients. Furthermore, EPEC infection may lead to severe malabsorption of nutrients, and even evolve to food intolerance, resulting in nutritional aggravation and persistence of diarrhea [213]. The infective dose of EPEC necessary to cause disease in infants has not been established. Studies in volunteers indicate that a high infective dose is necessary to induce diarrhea (109 and 1010 bacteria), but in children it is presumed to be much lower [8]. Although adult volunteers ingesting large numbers (109 to 1010) of EPEC cells presented short incubation periods (12 to 24 h) to develop diarrhea [7, 193, 214, 215], the incubation periods in infants is unknown [216, 217]. The examination of intestinal biopsies of infected infants have shown that EPEC adhere to the mucosa of the small and large intestines, and intimate attachment to the small bowel mucosa has been demonstrated in many (but not all) cases of diarrhea by EPEC [218-221]. The presence of the A/E lesion appears to be related to fluid secretion, and disarrangement of the digestive-absorptive enzyme system, which leads to malabsorption of nutrients. Edema, neutrophil infiltrate, and reduced enzymatic activity in the intestinal mucosa have been found following EPEC infection [181, 218, 222]. IMMUNE RESPONSE Antibody response to the O antigen of certain O serogroups has been demonstrated in volunteers convalescing from experimental EPEC infection [193, 223] and in children older than 1 year of age [6]. In addition, most EPEC virulence factors, such as the major adhesins (intimin, and BFP) and cell-signaling proteins (EspA, EspB and Tir)

36 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Gomes and González-Pedrajo

were shown to induce an immune response in serum (IgG and IgM), and milk, colostrum and saliva (sIgA) of healthy and sick human hosts and in colostrum and milk of bovines [224-236]. In breast milk, IgA and other factors (i.e., oligosaccharide fractions) were shown to contribute to immunity by blocking bacterial adherence [232]. A strong antibody response in serum and saliva of children reactive to EPEC virulence factors was shown to develop early, since children around 12 months of age presented an antibody repertoire equivalent to that of an adult at the same geographical area [234]. Taken together, these findings suggest that the reduction in the frequency of tEPEC in children older than 2 years of age may be at least in part due to the development of a repertoire of anti-EPEC antibodies. It has been demonstrated that purified flagellin induces IL-8 production by Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5) activation in enterocyte monolayers infected with tEPEC [79]. Zhou et al. [237] demonstrated that flagellins H6 and H34 of tEPEC stimulated IL-8 production in T84 monolayers. Using a flagellin deficient mutant, Sampaio et al. [80] have recently shown that the flagella of aEPEC strain 1711-4 (serotype O51:H40) induced IL-8 production in Caco-2 cells at an early stage of infection (3 hours). As a fliC derivative mutant of this strain still induced IL-8 levels at least 2 times higher than that of uninfected monolayers at 24 h post-infection, it was hypothesized that at a later stage of infection the wild-type aEPEC 1711-4 could stimulate IL-8 production in a flagellin-independent pathway (24 h) [80]. The significance of these findings in vivo remains to be confirmed. DIAGNOSIS Currently, molecular assays are more appropriate methods for EPEC identification. These methods include PCR and multiplex PCR, as well as genetic probes, to detect pEAF (EAF probe) [238], bfpA (encoding the major pilin subunit of BFP), eae genes (or other conserved LEE-genes) and the stx genes (encoding Shiga toxins) [18, 44, 239-241]. EPEC strains have been identified by the presence of the LEE region and absence of the stx genes; lack of stx distinguishes EPEC from enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC). tEPEC and aEPEC strains are differentiated mainly by the presence of the EAF sequence and/or the bfpA gene in the former group. Although all tEPEC strains carry bfpA, some aEPEC strains contain a defective bfp operon, thus resulting in positive reactions to this gene. For this reason and to differentiate atypical from typical EPEC, search for BFP expression by immunological methods is recommended [11, 26, 242]. As aEPEC strains are very heterogeneous and may often be isolated from non-diarrheic children, it should be important to demonstrate the potential ability of E. coli strains diagnosed as aEPEC to promote A/E lesions on epithelial cells. This could be achieved in vitro by the Fluorescent Actin Staining Method described by Knutton et al. [243]. Nonetheless, the use of methods to identify BFP expression and ability to promote A/E lesions is so far restricted to research laboratories. TREATMENT AND PROPHYLAXIS Oral rehydration therapy noticeably reduces early mortality and is the most effective therapy against mild EPEC infections. However, it has been shown that children with EPEC may not respond to this therapeutic measure, and some children may present intolerance to cow’s milk, require hospitalization and develop persistent diarrhea [213]. This is probably due to the damage caused in the intestinal mucosa, which may require time to fully recover its functions (digestion, absorption, and defense) [8]. Antibiotic therapy is only recommended for more severe cases or cases of persistent diarrhea associated with aEPEC [203, 244]. However, the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of tEPEC and aEPEC vary among the different geographic areas studied and antibiotic resistance are common in many areas of the world [26, 198, 216, 244-247]. Consequently, susceptibility testing must be performed before the establishment of therapy. A conserved conjugative plasmid carrying antibiotic resistance was identified among tEPEC strains of serotypes O111:H2 (and non-motile), and aEPEC strains of serotype O119:H2 of different geographical areas [248]. More recently, this plasmid was identified in tEPEC strains of other serotypes (O55:H6, O127:H6, and O119:H6) and in aEPEC strains of serogroups O55 and O119 [245]. As already mentioned, breast milk may contain antibodies against EPEC O antigens and outer membrane proteins, which inhibit EPEC adherence to tissue culture cells [232]. Breast-feeding has a protective effect [212, 224, 225,

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC)

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 37

249, 250] probably due to the cooperative protective effect of IgA antibodies to EPEC components and the presence of oligosaccharides that inhibit adhesion [232], or a direct inhibitory effect of lactoferrin on EPEC [251]. Besides breast feeding, protection offered by appropriate sanitary conditions and corrected hygiene and alimentation practices could prevent the infection of poor children in developing countries [252]. An EPEC vaccine would benefit poor children as these conditions are difficult to be implemented in these countries. However, there is currently no licensed vaccine available against EPEC infections of humans [reviewed in [253]]. A plant based vaccine was constructed using BfpA (the structural subunit A of the bundle-forming pilus) as antigens to induce high levels of phytosecreted BfpA in BALB/c mice by the induction and detection of fecal anti-BfpA antibodies [254]. Since natural infections in rabbits with a REPEC (Rabbit EPEC) strain induce A/E lesions in a manner similar to human EPEC [255, 256], the development of vaccines against human EPEC could benefit from the elaboration of a vaccine against REPEC or other A/E lesion producing pathogen. Some laboratories are trying to develop vaccines by inactivating some virulence genes to generate attenuated vaccines lacking genes encoding important virulence factors, such as intimin or the Ler-encoding gene [223, 255]. A deletion mutation in the ler gene in a wild-type REPEC strain was constructed resulting in diminished T3SS-secreted effector proteins by the mutant strain and in preventing REPEC from adhering intimately to the rabbit intestinal mucosa in vivo with vaccinated animals, demonstrating no clinical evidence of disease. It remains to be determined whether this vaccine could protect against A/E producing E. coli strains in different hosts [257, 258]. Other groups have cloned specific EPEC or EHEC virulence genes to induce protective responses in the host, mainly the gene encoding intimin. In a recent study, two distinct fragments of intimin β (one of the most frequent EPEC intimin subtype) were expressed in Lactobacillus casei strains for nasal immunization of mice. This procedure induced specific antibodies in the sera (IgG) and nasal washes (sIgA), which were active against the intimin immunodominant region and inhibited EPEC adhesion to epithelial cells in vitro [259]. In another recent study, an attenuated Vibrio cholerae strain (CVD 103-HgR) expressing the C-terminal portion of intimin in fusion with ClyA (a secreted protein from Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi) has been reported [260]. This construction showed moderate protection efficacy in rabbits challenged with a virulent REPEC strain. In addition, EspA was lately expressed in Lactococcus lactis NZ9000 and used to immunize mice; antisera from immunized animals were shown to interrupt the interaction of E. coli O157:H7 with the host cell [261]. Despite the assays were designed to produce an EspA-oral vaccine against E. coli O157:H7 infections, they could also be an alternative candidate to prevent EPEC infections. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Work in the laboratory of T.A.T.G. is supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). Work in the laboratory of B.G.P. is supported by grants 81847 from CONACyT and IN224708 from DGAPA, UNAM. We thank Dr. Waldir P. Elias and B.G.P. lab students and academic technician Norma Espinosa Sánchez for useful discussion and contributions to this work. REFERENCES [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

Robins-Browne RM. Traditional enteropathogenic Escherichia coli of infantile diarrhea. Rev Infect Dis. 1987;9(1):28-53. Levine MM, Kaper JB, Black RE, et al. New knowledge on pathogenesis of bacterial enteric infections as applied to vaccine development. Microbiol Rev. 1983;47(4):510-50. Bray J. Isolation of antigenically homogeneous strains of Bacterium coli neopolitanum from summer diarrhoea of infants. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1945;57:239-47. Varela G, Aguirre A, Carrillo J. Escherichia coli-gomez nueva especie aislada de un caso mortal de diarrea. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 1946;3(3). Levine MM. Escherichia coli that cause diarrhea: enterotoxigenic, enteropathogenic, enteroinvasive, enterohemorrhagic, and enteroadherent. J Infect Dis. 1987;155(3):377-89. Neter E, Westphal O, Luderitz O, et al. Demonstration of antibodies against enteropathogenic Escherichia coli in sera of children of various ages. Pediatrics. 1955;16(6):801-8.

38 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

[7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27]

[28] [29] [30] [31]

[32]

[33] [34]

Gomes and González-Pedrajo

Levine MM, Bergquist EJ, Nalin DR, et al. Escherichia coli strains that cause diarrhoea but do not produce heat-labile or heat-stable enterotoxins and are non-invasive. Lancet. 1978;1(8074):1119-22. Nataro JP, Kaper JB. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11(1):142-201. Kaper JB. Defining EPEC. Rev Microbiol. 1996;27(130-3). Chen HD, Frankel G. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: unravelling pathogenesis. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005;29(1):8398. Trabulsi LR, Keller R, Tardelli Gomes TA. Typical and atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8(5):508-13. Hernandes RT, Elias WP, Vieira MA, et al. An overview of atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;297(2):137-49. Tikhomirov E. WHO programme for the control of hospital infections. Chemioterapia. 1987;6(3):148-51. Campos LC, Franzolin MR, Trabulsi LR. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli categories among the traditional enteropathogenic E. coli O serogroups--a review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2004;99(6):545-52. Elias WP, Barros SF, Moreira CG, et al. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli strains among classical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli O serogroups. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(9):3540-1. Gomes TA, Vieira MA, Wachsmuth IK, et al. Serotype-specific prevalence of Escherichia coli strains with EPEC adherence factor genes in infants with and without diarrhea in Sao Paulo, Brazil. J Infect Dis. 1989;160(1):131-5. Torres AG, Zhou X, Kaper JB. Adherence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli strains to epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 2005;73(1):18-29. Giron JA, Donnenberg MS, Martin WC, et al. Distribution of the bundle-forming pilus structural gene (bfpA) among enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Infect Dis. 1993;168(4):1037-41. Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HL. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2(2):123-40. Scaletsky IC, Silva ML, Trabulsi LR. Distinctive patterns of adherence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to HeLa cells. Infect Immun. 1984;45(2):534-6. Giron JA, Ho AS, Schoolnik GK. An inducible bundle-forming pilus of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science. 1991;254(5032):710-3. Polotsky YE, Dragunskaya EM, Seliverstova VG, et al. Pathogenic effect of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Escherichia coli causing infantile diarrhoea. Acta Microbiol Acad Sci Hung. 1977;24(3):221-36. Nougayrede JP, Fernandes PJ, Donnenberg MS. Adhesion of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to host cells. Cell Microbiol. 2003;5(6):359-72. Rodrigues J, Scaletsky IC, Campos LC, et al. Clonal structure and virulence factors in strains of Escherichia coli of the classic serogroup O55. Infect Immun. 1996;64(7):2680-6. Knutton S, Phillips AD, Smith HR, et al. Screening for enteropathogenic Escherichia coli in infants with diarrhea by the fluorescent-actin staining test. Infect Immun. 1991;59(1):365-71. Abe CM, Trabulsi LR, Blanco J, et al. Virulence features of atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli identified by the eae(+) EAF-negative stx(-) genetic profile. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;64(4):357-65. Dulguer MV, Fabbricotti SH, Bando SY, et al. Atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains: phenotypic and genetic profiling reveals a strong association between enteroaggregative E. coli heat-stable enterotoxin and diarrhea. J Infect Dis. 2003;188(11):1685-94. Gomes TA, Irino K, Girao DM, et al. Emerging enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains? Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10(10):1851-5. Rosa AC, Mariano AT, Pereira AM, et al. Enteropathogenicity markers in Escherichia coli isolated from infants with acute diarrhoea and healthy controls in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Med Microbiol. 1998;47(9):781-90. Pelayo JS, Scaletsky IC, Pedroso MZ, et al. Virulence properties of atypical EPEC strains. J Med Microbiol. 1999;48(1):41-9. Scaletsky IC, Pedroso MZ, Oliva CA, et al. A localized adherence-like pattern as a second pattern of adherence of classic enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to HEp-2 cells that is associated with infantile diarrhea. Infect Immun. 1999;67(7):3410-5. Vieira MA, Andrade JR, Trabulsi LR, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of Escherichia coli strains of nonenteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) serogroups that carry eae and lack the EPEC adherence factor and Shiga toxin DNA probe sequences. J Infect Dis. 2001;183(5):762-72. Robins-Browne RM, Bordun AM, Tauschek M, et al. Escherichia coli and community-acquired gastroenteritis, Melbourne, Australia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10(10):1797-805. Nunes EB, Saridakis HO, Irino K, et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of attaching and effacing Escherichia coli (AEEC) isolated from children with and without diarrhoea in Londrina, Brazil. J Med Microbiol. 2003;52(Pt 6):499-504.

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC)

[35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40]

[41] [42] [43] [44] [45]

[46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52]

[53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59]

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 39

Moreira CG, Palmer K, Whiteley M, et al. Bundle-forming pili and EspA are involved in biofilm formation by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(11):3952-61. Stone KD, Zhang HZ, Carlson LK, et al. A cluster of fourteen genes from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli is sufficient for the biogenesis of a type IV pilus. Mol Microbiol. 1996;20(2):325-37. Sohel I, Puente JL, Ramer SW, et al. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: identification of a gene cluster coding for bundleforming pilus morphogenesis. J Bacteriol. 1996;178(9):2613-28. Cleary J, Lai LC, Shaw RK, et al. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells: role of bundle-forming pili (BFP), EspA filaments and intimin. Microbiology. 2004;150(Pt 3):527-38. Hicks S, Frankel G, Kaper JB, et al. Role of intimin and bundle-forming pili in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli adhesion to pediatric intestinal tissue in vitro. Infect Immun. 1998;66(4):1570-8. Knutton S, Shaw RK, Anantha RP, et al. The type IV bundle-forming pilus of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli undergoes dramatic alterations in structure associated with bacterial adherence, aggregation and dispersal. Mol Microbiol. 1999;33(3):499-509. Tobe T, Sasakawa C. Role of bundle-forming pilus of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli in host cell adherence and in microcolony development. Cell Microbiol. 2001;3(9):579-85. Hyland RM, Sun J, Griener TP, et al. The bundlin pilin protein of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli is an Nacetyllactosamine-specific lectin. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10(1):177-87. Bieber D, Ramer SW, Wu CY, et al. Type IV pili, transient bacterial aggregates, and virulence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science. 1998;280(5372):2114-8. Jerse AE, Yu J, Tall BD, et al. A genetic locus of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli necessary for the production of attaching and effacing lesions on tissue culture cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87(20):7839-43. Frankel G, Candy DC, Everest P, et al. Characterization of the C-terminal domains of intimin-like proteins of enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli, Citrobacter freundii, and Hafnia alvei. Infect Immun. 1994;62(5):1835-42. Jores J, Rumer L, Kiessling S, et al. A novel locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) pathogenicity island inserted at pheV in bovine Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strain O103:H2. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001;204(1):75-9. Adu-Bobie J, Frankel G, Bain C, et al. Detection of intimins alpha, beta, gamma, and delta, four intimin derivatives expressed by attaching and effacing microbial pathogens. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36(3):662-8. Blanco M, Blanco JE, Dahbi G, et al. Identification of two new intimin types in atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Int Microbiol. 2006;9(2):103-10. Tarr CL, Whittam TS. Molecular evolution of the intimin gene in O111 clones of pathogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2002;184(2):479-87. Yamamoto D, Hernandes RT, Blanco M, et al. Invasiveness as a putative additional virulence mechanism of some atypical Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains with different uncommon intimin types. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9:146. Zhang WL, Kohler B, Oswald E, et al. Genetic diversity of intimin genes of attaching and effacing Escherichia coli strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(12):4486-92. Jenkins C, Smith HR, Lawson AJ, et al. Serotypes, intimin subtypes, and antimicrobial resistance patterns of atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated in England from 1993 to 1996. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;25(1):1924. Moreira FC, Vieira MA, Ferreira AJ, et al. Escherichia coli strains of serotype O51:H40 comprise typical and atypical enteropathogenic E. coli strains and are potentially diarrheagenic. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(4):1462-5. Kenny B, DeVinney R, Stein M, et al. Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) transfers its receptor for intimate adherence into mammalian cells. Cell. 1997;91(4):511-20. Frankel G, Phillips AD. Attaching effacing Escherichia coli and paradigms of Tir-triggered actin polymerization: getting off the pedestal. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10(3):549-56. Phillips AD, Frankel G. Intimin-mediated tissue specificity in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli interaction with human intestinal organ cultures. J Infect Dis. 2000;181(4):1496-500. Klapproth JM, Scaletsky IC, McNamara BP, et al. A large toxin from pathogenic Escherichia coli strains that inhibits lymphocyte activation. Infect Immun. 2000;68(4):2148-55. Nicholls L, Grant TH, Robins-Browne RM. Identification of a novel genetic locus that is required for in vitro adhesion of a clinical isolate of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli to epithelial cells. Mol Microbiol. 2000;35(2):275-88. Karmali MA, Mascarenhas M, Shen S, et al. Association of genomic O island 122 of Escherichia coli EDL 933 with verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli seropathotypes that are linked to epidemic and/or serious disease. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(11):4930-40.

40 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

[60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80]

[81]

[82] [83] [84] [85] [86]

Gomes and González-Pedrajo

Klapproth JM, Sasaki M, Sherman M, et al. Citrobacter rodentium lifA/efa1 is essential for colonic colonization and crypt cell hyperplasia in vivo. Infect Immun. 2005;73(3):1441-51. Badea L, Doughty S, Nicholls L, et al. Contribution of Efa1/LifA to the adherence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to epithelial cells. Microb Pathog. 2003;34(5):205-15. Afset JE, Bruant G, Brousseau R, et al. Identification of virulence genes linked with diarrhea due to atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli by DNA microarray analysis and PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(10):3703-11. Vieira MA, Salvador FA, Silva RM, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of the O122 pathogenicity island in typical and atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(4):1452-5. Iguchi A, Thomson NR, Ogura Y, et al. Complete genome sequence and comparative genome analysis of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli O127:H6 strain E2348/69. J Bacteriol. 2009;191(1):347-54. Tatsuno I, Mundy R, Frankel G, et al. The lpf gene cluster for long polar fimbriae is not involved in adherence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli or virulence of Citrobacter rodentium. Infect Immun. 2006;74(1):265-72. Baumler AJ, Tsolis RM, Heffron F. Contribution of fimbrial operons to attachment to and invasion of epithelial cell lines by Salmonella typhimurium. Infect Immun. 1996;64(5):1862-5. Jordan DM, Cornick N, Torres AG, et al. Long polar fimbriae contribute to colonization by Escherichia coli O157:H7 in vivo. Infect Immun. 2004;72(10):6168-71. Torres AG, Lopez-Sanchez GN, Milflores-Flores L, et al. Ler and H-NS, regulators controlling expression of the long polar fimbriae of Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Bacteriol. 2007;189(16):5916-28. Torres AG, Milflores-Flores L, Garcia-Gallegos JG, et al. Environmental regulation and colonization attributes of the long polar fimbriae (LPF) of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Int J Med Microbiol. 2007;297(3):177-85. Tomson FL, Viswanathan VK, Kanack KJ, et al. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli EspG disrupts microtubules and in conjunction with Orf3 enhances perturbation of the tight junction barrier. Mol Microbiol. 2005;56(2):447-64. Torres AG, Blanco M, Valenzuela P, et al. Genes related to long polar fimbriae of pathogenic Escherichia coli strains as reliable markers to identify virulent isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(8):2442-51. Rendon MA, Saldana Z, Erdem AL, et al. Commensal and pathogenic Escherichia coli use a common pilus adherence factor for epithelial cell colonization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(25):10637-42. Beinke C, Laarmann S, Wachter C, et al. Diffusely adhering Escherichia coli strains induce attaching and effacing phenotypes and secrete homologs of Esp proteins. Infect Immun. 1998;66(2):528-39. Keller R, Ordonez JG, de Oliveira RR, et al. Afa, a diffuse adherence fibrillar adhesin associated with enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 2002;70(5):2681-9. Scaletsky IC, Michalski J, Torres AG, et al. Identification and characterization of the locus for diffuse adherence, which encodes a novel afimbrial adhesin found in atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 2005;73(8):4753-65. Torres AG, Tutt CB, Duval L, et al. Bile salts induce expression of the afimbrial LDA adhesin of atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9(4):1039-49. Barros SF, Abe CM, Rocha SP, et al. Escherichia coli O125ac:H6 encompasses atypical enteropathogenic E. coli strains that display the aggregative adherence pattern. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(12):4052-5. Ramos HC, Rumbo M, Sirard JC. Bacterial flagellins: mediators of pathogenicity and host immune responses in mucosa. Trends Microbiol. 2004;12(11):509-17. Giron JA, Torres AG, Freer E, et al. The flagella of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli mediate adherence to epithelial cells. Mol Microbiol. 2002;44(2):361-79. Sampaio SC, Gomes TA, Pichon C, et al. The flagella of an atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strain are required for efficient interaction with and stimulation of interleukin-8 production by enterocytes in vitro. Infect Immun. 2009;77(10):4406-13. Jarvis KG, Giron JA, Jerse AE, et al. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli contains a putative type III secretion system necessary for the export of proteins involved in attaching and effacing lesion formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(17):7996-8000. Elliott SJ, Wainwright LA, McDaniel TK, et al. The complete sequence of the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli E2348/69. Mol Microbiol. 1998;28(1):1-4. Hueck CJ. Type III protein secretion systems in bacterial pathogens of animals and plants. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62(2):379-433. Cornelis GR. The type III secretion injectisome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4(11):811-25. Marlovits TC, Stebbins CE. Type III secretion systems shape up as they ship out. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2009;13(1):47-52. Galan JE, Wolf-Watz H. Protein delivery into eukaryotic cells by type III secretion machines. Nature. 2006;444(7119):567-73.

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC)

[87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107]

[108] [109] [110] [111] [112] [113] [114]

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 41

Sekiya K, Ohishi M, Ogino T, et al. Supermolecular structure of the enteropathogenic Escherichia coli type III secretion system and its direct interaction with the EspA-sheath-like structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(20):11638-43. Kubori T, Matsushima Y, Nakamura D, et al. Supramolecular structure of the Salmonella typhimurium type III protein secretion system. Science. 1998;280(5363):602-5. Blocker A, Jouihri N, Larquet E, et al. Structure and composition of the Shigella flexneri "needle complex", a part of its type III secreton. Mol Microbiol. 2001;39(3):652-63. Mueller CA, Broz P, Cornelis GR. The type III secretion system tip complex and translocon. Mol Microbiol. 2008;68(5):1085-95. Mueller CA, Broz P, Muller SA, et al. The V-antigen of Yersinia forms a distinct structure at the tip of injectisome needles. Science. 2005;310(5748):674-6. Macnab RM. Type III flagellar protein export and flagellar assembly. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1694(1-3):207-17. Blocker A, Komoriya K, Aizawa S. Type III secretion systems and bacterial flagella: insights into their function from structural similarities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(6):3027-30. Gophna U, Ron EZ, Graur D. Bacterial type III secretion systems are ancient and evolved by multiple horizontal-transfer events. Gene. 2003;312:151-63. Ogino T, Ohno R, Sekiya K, et al. Assembly of the type III secretion apparatus of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(8):2801-11. Genin S, Boucher CA. A superfamily of proteins involved in different secretion pathways in gram-negative bacteria: modular structure and specificity of the N-terminal domain. Mol Gen Genet. 1994;243(1):112-8. Gauthier A, Puente JL, Finlay BB. Secretin of the enteropathogenic Escherichia coli type III secretion system requires components of the type III apparatus for assembly and localization. Infect Immun. 2003;71(6):3310-9. Spreter T, Yip CK, Sanowar S, et al. A conserved structural motif mediates formation of the periplasmic rings in the type III secretion system. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16(5):468-76. Yip CK, Kimbrough TG, Felise HB, et al. Structural characterization of the molecular platform for type III secretion system assembly. Nature. 2005;435(7042):702-7. Pallen MJ, Beatson SA, Bailey CM. Bioinformatics analysis of the locus for enterocyte effacement provides novel insights into type-III secretion. BMC Microbiol. 2005;5(1):9. Minamino T, Imada K, Namba K. Mechanisms of type III protein export for bacterial flagellar assembly. Mol Biosyst. 2008;4(11):1105-15. Trevor FM, Spreter T, Strynadka NC. Piecing together the Type III injectisome of bacterial pathogens. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2007;18:1-9. Zarivach R, Deng W, Vuckovic M, et al. Structural analysis of the essential self-cleaving type III secretion proteins EscU and SpaS. Nature. 2008;453(7191):124-7. Schraidt O, Lefebre MD, Brunner MJ, et al. Topology and organization of the Salmonella typhimurium type III secretion needle complex components. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(4):e1000824. Zhu K, Gonzalez-Pedrajo B, Macnab RM. Interactions among membrane and soluble components of the flagellar export apparatus of Salmonella. Biochemistry. 2002;41(30):9516-24. Creasey EA, Delahay RM, Daniell SJ, et al. Yeast two-hybrid system survey of interactions between LEE-encoded proteins of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Microbiology. 2003;149(Pt 8):2093-106. Dreyfus G, Williams AW, Kawagishi I, et al. Genetic and biochemical analysis of Salmonella typhimurium FliI, a flagellar protein related to the catalytic subunit of the F0F1 ATPase and to virulence proteins of mammalian and plant pathogens. J Bacteriol. 1993;175(10):3131-8. Eichelberg K, Ginocchio CC, Galan JE. Molecular and functional characterization of the Salmonella typhimurium invasion genes invB and invC: homology of InvC to the F0F1 ATPase family of proteins. J Bacteriol. 1994;176(15):4501-10. Akeda Y, Galan JE. Chaperone release and unfolding of substrates in type III secretion. Nature. 2005;437(7060):911-5. Gauthier A, Finlay BB. Translocated intimin receptor and its chaperone interact with ATPase of the type III secretion apparatus of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2003;185(23):6747-55. Thomas J, Stafford GP, Hughes C. Docking of cytosolic chaperone-substrate complexes at the membrane ATPase during flagellar type III protein export. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(11):3945-50. Andrade A, Pardo JP, Espinosa N, et al. Enzymatic characterization of the enteropathogenic Escherichia coli type III secretion ATPase EscN. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007;468(1):121-7. Zarivach R, Vuckovic M, Deng W, et al. Structural analysis of a prototypical ATPase from the type III secretion system. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007;14(2):131-7. Knutton S, Rosenshine I, Pallen MJ, et al. A novel EspA-associated surface organelle of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli involved in protein translocation into epithelial cells. Embo J. 1998;17(8):2166-76.

42 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Gomes and González-Pedrajo

[115] Daniell SJ, Takahashi N, Wilson R, et al. The filamentous type III secretion translocon of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Cell Microbiol. 2001;3(12):865-71. [116] Shaw RK, Daniell S, Ebel F, et al. EspA filament-mediated protein translocation into red blood cells. Cell Microbiol. 2001;3(4):213-22. [117] Crepin VF, Shaw R, Abe CM, et al. Polarity of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli EspA filament assembly and protein secretion. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(8):2881-9. [118] Ide T, Laarmann S, Greune L, et al. Characterization of translocation pores inserted into plasma membranes by type IIIsecreted Esp proteins of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Cell Microbiol. 2001;3(10):669-79. [119] Kenny B, Abe A, Stein M, et al. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli protein secretion is induced in response to conditions similar to those in the gastrointestinal tract. Infect Immun. 1997;65(7):2606-12. [120] Deng W, Li Y, Hardwidge PR, et al. Regulation of type III secretion hierarchy of translocators and effectors in attaching and effacing bacterial pathogens. Infect Immun. 2005;73(4):2135-46. [121] Wang D, Roe AJ, McAteer S, et al. Hierarchal type III secretion of translocators and effectors from Escherichia coli O157:H7 requires the carboxy terminus of SepL that binds to Tir. Mol Microbiol. 2008;69(6):1499-512. [122] Deng W, Puente JL, Gruenheid S, et al. Dissecting virulence: systematic and functional analyses of a pathogenicity island. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(10):3597-602. [123] Dean P, Kenny B. The effector repertoire of enteropathogenic E. coli: ganging up on the host cell. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2009;12(1):101-9. [124] Kanack KJ, Crawford JA, Tatsuno I, et al. SepZ/EspZ is secreted and translocated into HeLa cells by the enteropathogenic Escherichia coli type III secretion system. Infect Immun. 2005;73(7):4327-37. [125] Kenny B. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC)-- a crafty subversive little bug. Microbiology. 2002;148(Pt 7):1967-78. [126] Jepson MA, Pellegrin S, Peto L, et al. Synergistic roles for the Map and Tir effector molecules in mediating uptake of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) into non-phagocytic cells. Cell Microbiol. 2003;5(11):773-83. [127] Kenny B, Ellis S, Leard AD, et al. Co-ordinate regulation of distinct host cell signalling pathways by multifunctional enteropathogenic Escherichia coli effector molecules. Mol Microbiol. 2002;44(4):1095-107. [128] Garmendia J, Frankel G, Crepin VF. Enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infections: translocation, translocation, translocation. Infect Immun. 2005;73(5):2573-85. [129] Dean P, Maresca M, Kenny B. EPEC's weapons of mass subversion. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005;8(1):28-34. [130] Kenny B, Jepson M. Targeting of an enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) effector protein to host mitochondria. Cell Microbiol. 2000;2(6):579-90. [131] Dean P, Kenny B. Intestinal barrier dysfunction by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli is mediated by two effector molecules and a bacterial surface protein. Mol Microbiol. 2004;54(3):665-75. [132] Bulgin R, Raymond B, Garnett JA, et al. Bacterial guanine nucleotide exchange factors SopE-like and WxxxE effectors. Infect Immun. 2010;78(4):1417-25. [133] Nougayrede JP, Donnenberg MS. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli EspF is targeted to mitochondria and is required to initiate the mitochondrial death pathway. Cell Microbiol. 2004;6(11):1097-111. [134] McNamara BP, Koutsouris A, O'Connell CB, et al. Translocated EspF protein from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli disrupts host intestinal barrier function. J Clin Invest. 2001;107(5):621-9. [135] Shaw RK, Cleary J, Murphy MS, et al. Interaction of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli with human intestinal mucosa: role of effector proteins in brush border remodeling and formation of attaching and effacing lesions. Infect Immun. 2005;73(2):1243-51. [136] Peralta-Ramirez J, Hernandez JM, Manning-Cela R, et al. EspF Interacts with nucleation-promoting factors to recruit junctional proteins into pedestals for pedestal maturation and disruption of paracellular permeability. Infect Immun. 2008;76(9):3854-68. [137] Crane JK, McNamara BP, Donnenberg MS. Role of EspF in host cell death induced by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Cell Microbiol. 2001;3(4):197-211. [138] Quitard S, Dean P, Maresca M, et al. The enteropathogenic Escherichia coli EspF effector molecule inhibits PI-3 kinasemediated uptake independently of mitochondrial targeting. Cell Microbiol. 2006;8(6):972-81. [139] Shaw RK, Smollett K, Cleary J, et al. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli type III effectors EspG and EspG2 disrupt the microtubule network of intestinal epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 2005;73(7):4385-90. [140] Matsuzawa T, Kuwae A, Yoshida S, et al. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli activates the RhoA signaling pathway via the stimulation of GEF-H1. Embo J. 2004;23(17):3570-82. [141] Gill RK, Borthakur A, Hodges K, et al. Mechanism underlying inhibition of intestinal apical Cl/OH exchange following infection with enteropathogenic E. coli. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(2):428-37.

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC)

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 43

[142] Dean P, Muhlen S, Quitard S, et al. The bacterial effectors EspG and EspG2 induce a destructive calpain activity that is kept in check by the co-delivered Tir effector. Cell Microbiol. 2010 Mar 25. [143] Tu X, Nisan I, Yona C, et al. EspH, a new cytoskeleton-modulating effector of enterohaemorrhagic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2003;47(3):595-606. [144] Dong N, Liu L, Shao F. A bacterial effector targets host DH-PH domain RhoGEFs and antagonizes macrophage phagocytosis. EMBO J. 2010;29(8):1363-76. [145] Shames SR, Deng W, Guttman JA, et al. The pathogenic E. coli type III effector EspZ interacts with host CD98 and facilitates host cell prosurvival signaling. Cell Microbiol. 2010 Mar 31. [146] Taylor KA, O'Connell CB, Luther PW, et al. The EspB protein of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli is targeted to the cytoplasm of infected HeLa cells. Infect Immun. 1998;66(11):5501-7. [147] Iizumi Y, Sagara H, Kabe Y, et al. The enteropathogenic E. coli effector EspB facilitates microvillus effacing and antiphagocytosis by inhibiting myosin function. Cell Host Microbe. 2007;2(6):383-92. [148] Croxen MA, Finlay BB. Molecular mechanisms of Escherichia coli pathogenicity. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(1):26-38. [149] Kim J, Thanabalasuriar A, Chaworth-Musters T, et al. The bacterial virulence factor NleA inhibits cellular protein secretion by disrupting mammalian COPII function. Cell Host Microbe. 2007;2(3):160-71. [150] Thanabalasuriar A, Koutsouris A, Weflen A, et al. The bacterial virulence factor NleA is required for the disruption of intestinal tight junctions by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Cell Microbiol. 2009;12(1):31-41. [151] Nadler C, Baruch K, Kobi S, et al. The type III secretion effector NleE inhibits NF-kappaB activation. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(1):e1000743. [152] Zurawski DV, Mumy KL, Badea L, et al. The NleE/OspZ family of effector proteins is required for polymorphonuclear transepithelial migration, a characteristic shared by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and Shigella flexneri infections. Infect Immun. 2008;76(1):369-79. [153] Hemrajani C, Berger CN, Robinson KS, et al. NleH effectors interact with Bax inhibitor-1 to block apoptosis during enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(7):3129-34. [154] Matsuzawa T, Kuwae A, Abe A. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli type III effectors EspG and EspG2 alter epithelial paracellular permeability. Infect Immun. 2005;73(10):6283-9. [155] Marches O, Covarelli V, Dahan S, et al. EspJ of enteropathogenic and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli inhibits opsono-phagocytosis. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10(5):1104-15. [156] Samba-Louaka A, Nougayrede JP, Watrin C, et al. The enteropathogenic Escherichia coli effector Cif induces delayed apoptosis in epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 2009;77(12):5471-7. [157] Ghosh P. Process of protein transport by the type III secretion system. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004;68(4):771-95. [158] Elliott SJ, O'Connell CB, Koutsouris A, et al. A gene from the locus of enterocyte effacement that is required for enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to increase tight-junction permeability encodes a chaperone for EspF. Infect Immun. 2002;70(5):2271-7. [159] Elliott SJ, Hutcheson SW, Dubois MS, et al. Identification of CesT, a chaperone for the type III secretion of Tir in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1999;33(6):1176-89. [160] Creasey EA, Delahay RM, Bishop AA, et al. CesT is a bivalent enteropathogenic Escherichia coli chaperone required for translocation of both Tir and Map. Mol Microbiol. 2003;47(1):209-21. [161] Abe A, de Grado M, Pfuetzner RA, et al. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli translocated intimin receptor, Tir, requires a specific chaperone for stable secretion. Mol Microbiol. 1999;33(6):1162-75. [162] Thomas NA, Deng W, Baker N, et al. Hierarchical delivery of an essential host colonization factor in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(40):29634-45. [163] Thomas NA, Deng W, Puente JL, et al. CesT is a multi-effector chaperone and recruitment factor required for the efficient type III secretion of both LEE- and non-LEE-encoded effectors of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2005;57(6):1762-79. [164] Mills E, Baruch K, Charpentier X, et al. Real-time analysis of effector translocation by the type III secretion system of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Cell Host Microbe. 2008;3(2):104-13. [165] Yen YT, Kostakioti M, Henderson IR, et al. Common themes and variations in serine protease autotransporters. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16(8):370-9. [166] Mellies JL, Navarro-Garcia F, Okeke I, et al. espC pathogenicity island of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli encodes an enterotoxin. Infect Immun. 2001;69(1):315-24. [167] Stein M, Kenny B, Stein MA, et al. Characterization of EspC, a 110-kilodalton protein secreted by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli which is homologous to members of the immunoglobulin A protease-like family of secreted proteins. J Bacteriol. 1996;178(22):6546-54.

44 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Gomes and González-Pedrajo

[168] Navarro-Garcia F, Canizalez-Roman A, Sui BQ, et al. The serine protease motif of EspC from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli produces epithelial damage by a mechanism different from that of Pet toxin from enteroaggregative E. coli. Infect Immun. 2004;72(6):3609-21. [169] Drago-Serrano ME, Parra SG, Manjarrez-Hernandez HA. EspC, an autotransporter protein secreted by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), displays protease activity on human hemoglobin. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006;265(1):35-40. [170] Vidal JE, Navarro-Garcia F. EspC translocation into epithelial cells by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli requires a concerted participation of type V and III secretion systems. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10(10):1975-86. [171] Mellies JL, Barron AM, Carmona AM. Enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli virulence gene regulation. Infect Immun. 2007;75(9):4199-210. [172] Bustamante VH, Santana FJ, Calva E, et al. Transcriptional regulation of type III secretion genes in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: Ler antagonizes H-NS-dependent repression. Mol Microbiol. 2001;39(3):664-78. [173] Lio JC, Syu WJ. Identification of a negative regulator for the pathogenicity island of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Biomed Sci. 2004;11(6):855-63. [174] Barba J, Bustamante VH, Flores-Valdez MA, et al. A positive regulatory loop controls expression of the locus of enterocyte effacement-encoded regulators Ler and GrlA. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(23):7918-30. [175] Porter ME, Mitchell P, Roe AJ, et al. Direct and indirect transcriptional activation of virulence genes by an AraC-like protein, PerA from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2004;54(4):1117-33. [176] Gomez-Duarte OG, Kaper JB. A plasmid-encoded regulatory region activates chromosomal eaeA expression in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 1995;63(5):1767-76. [177] Elliott SJ, Sperandio V, Giron JA, et al. The locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE)-encoded regulator controls expression of both LEE- and non-LEE-encoded virulence factors in enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 2000;68(11):6115-26. [178] Li M, Rosenshine I, Tung SL, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of extracellular proteins of enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains and their ihf and ler mutants. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(9):5274-82. [179] Roe AJ, Tysall L, Dransfield T, et al. Analysis of the expression, regulation and export of NleA-E in Escherichia coli O157: H7. Microbiology. 2007;153(Pt 5):1350-60. [180] Pedroso MZ, Freymuller E, Trabulsi LR, et al. Attaching-effacing lesions and intracellular penetration in HeLa cells and human duodenal mucosa by two Escherichia coli strains not belonging to the classical enteropathogenic E. coli serogroups. Infect Immun. 1993;61(3):1152-6. [181] Ulshen MH, Rollo JL. Pathogenesis of Escherichia coli gastroenteritis in man--another mechanism. N Engl J Med. 1980;302(2):99-101. [182] Miliotis MD, Koornhof HJ, Phillips JI. Invasive potential of noncytotoxic enteropathogenic Escherichia coli in an in vitro Henle 407 cell model. Infect Immun. 1989;57(7):1928-35. [183] Francis CL, Jerse AE, Kaper JB, et al. Characterization of interactions of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli O127:H6 with mammalian cells in vitro. J Infect Dis. 1991;164(4):693-703. [184] Donnenberg MS, Donohue-Rolfe A, Keusch GT. Epithelial cell invasion: an overlooked property of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) associated with the EPEC adherence factor. J Infect Dis. 1989;160(3):452-9. [185] Andrade JR, Da Veiga VF, De Santa Rosa MR, et al. An endocytic process in HEp-2 cells induced by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Med Microbiol. 1989;28(1):49-57. [186] Rosa AC, Vieira MA, Tibana A, et al. Interactions of Escherichia coli strains of non-EPEC serogroups that carry eae and lack the EAF and stx gene sequences with undifferentiated and differentiated intestinal human Caco-2 cells. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001;200(1):117-22. [187] Hernandes RT, Silva RM, Carneiro SM, et al. The localized adherence pattern of an atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli is mediated by intimin omicron and unexpectedly promotes HeLa cell invasion. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10(2):415-25. [188] Scaletsky IC, Pedroso MZ, Fagundes-Neto U. Attaching and effacing enteropathogenic Escherichia coli O18ab invades epithelial cells and causes persistent diarrhea. Infect Immun. 1996;64(11):4876-81. [189] Bulgin RR, Arbeloa A, Chung JC, et al. EspT triggers formation of lamellipodia and membrane ruffles through activation of Rac-1 and Cdc42. Cell Microbiol. 2009;11(2):217-29. [190] Nguyen RN, Taylor LS, Tauschek M, et al. Atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection and prolonged diarrhea in children. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(4):597-603. [191] Afset JE, Bevanger L, Romundstad P, et al. Association of atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) with prolonged diarrhoea. J Med Microbiol. 2004;53(Pt 11):1137-44. [192] Vieira MA, Gomes TA, Ferreira AJ, et al. Two atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains induce the production of secreted and membrane-bound mucins to benefit their own growth at the apical surface of human mucin-secreting intestinal HT29-MTX cells. Infect Immun. 2010;78(3):927-38.

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC)

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 45

[193] Levine MM, Nataro JP, Karch H, et al. The diarrheal response of humans to some classic serotypes of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli is dependent on a plasmid encoding an enteroadhesiveness factor. J Infect Dis. 1985;152(3):550-9. [194] Bielaszewska M, Middendorf B, Kock R, et al. Shiga toxin-negative attaching and effacing Escherichia coli: distinct clinical associations with bacterial phylogeny and virulence traits and inferred in-host pathogen evolution. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(2):208-17. [195] Lacher DW, Steinsland H, Blank TE, et al. Molecular evolution of typical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: clonal analysis by multilocus sequence typing and virulence gene allelic profiling. J Bacteriol. 2007;189(2):342-50. [196] Bando SY, Andrade FB, Guth BE, et al. Atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli genomic background allows the acquisition of non-EPEC virulence factors. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;299(1):22–30. [197] Toledo MR, Alvariza Mdo C, Murahovschi J, et al. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli serotypes and endemic diarrhea in infants. Infect Immun. 1983;39(2):586-9. [198] Gomes TA, Rassi V, MacDonald KL, et al. Enteropathogens associated with acute diarrheal disease in urban infants in Sao Paulo, Brazil. J Infect Dis. 1991;164(2):331-7. [199] Cravioto A, Reyes RE, Trujillo F, et al. Risk of diarrhea during the first year of life associated with initial and subsequent colonization by specific enteropathogens. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;131(5):886-904. [200] Cravioto A, Reyes RE, Ortega R, et al. Prospective study of diarrhoeal disease in a cohort of rural Mexican children: incidence and isolated pathogens during the first two years of life. Epidemiol Infect. 1988;101(1):123-34. [201] Cohen MB, Nataro JP, Bernstein DI, et al. Prevalence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in acute childhood enteritis: a prospective controlled study. J Pediatr. 2005;146(1):54-61. [202] Regua-Mangia AH, Gomes TA, Vieira MA, et al. Frequency and characteristics of diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from children with and without diarrhoea in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Infect. 2004;48(2):161-7. [203] Ochoa TJ, Barletta F, Contreras C, et al. New insights into the epidemiology of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102(9):852-6. [204] Moreno AC, Filho AF, Gomes Tdo A, et al. Etiology of childhood diarrhea in the northeast of Brazil: significant emergent diarrheal pathogens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;66(1):50-7. [205] Franzolin MR, Alves RC, Keller R, et al. Prevalence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in children with diarrhea in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2005;100(4):359-63. [206] Bueris V, Sircili MP, Taddei CR, et al. Detection of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli from children with and without diarrhea in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007;102(7):839-44. [207] Araujo JM, Tabarelli GF, Aranda KR, et al. Typical enteroaggregative and atypical enteropathogenic types of Escherichia coli are the most prevalent diarrhea-associated pathotypes among Brazilian children. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(10):3396-9. [208] Estrada-Garcia T, Cerna JF, Paheco-Gil L, et al. Drug-resistant diarrheogenic Escherichia coli, Mexico. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(8):1306-8. [209] Viljanen MK, Peltola T, Junnila SY, et al. Outbreak of diarrhoea due to Escherichia coli O111:B4 in schoolchildren and adults: association of Vi antigen-like reactivity. Lancet. 1990;336(8719):831-4. [210] Hedberg CW, Savarino SJ, Besser JM, et al. An outbreak of foodborne illness caused by Escherichia coli O39:NM, an agent not fitting into the existing scheme for classifying diarrheogenic E. coli. J Infect Dis. 1997;176(6):1625-8. [211] Yatsuyanagi J, Saito S, Miyajima Y, et al. Characterization of atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains harboring the astA gene that were associated with a waterborne outbreak of diarrhea in Japan. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(5):2033-9. [212] Blake PA, Ramos S, MacDonald KL, et al. Pathogen-specific risk factors and protective factors for acute diarrheal disease in urban Brazilian infants. J Infect Dis. 1993;167(3):627-32. [213] Fagundes-Neto U, Scaletsky IC. The gut at war: the consequences of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection as a factor of diarrhea and malnutrition. Sao Paulo Med J. 2000;118(1):21-9. [214] Ferguson WW, June RC. Experiments on feeding adult volunteers with Escherichia coli 111, B4, a coliform organism associated with infant diarrhea. Am J Hyg. 1952;55(2):155-69. [215] June RC, Ferguson WW, Worfel MT. Experiments in feeding adult volunteers with Escherichia coli 55, B5, a coliform organism associated with infant diarrhea. Am J Hyg. 1953;57(2):222-36. [216] Thoren A. The role of enteropathogenic E. coli in infantile diarrhoea. Aspects on bacteriology, epidemiology and therapy. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1983;37:1-51. [217] Levine MM, Edelman R. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli of classic serotypes associated with infant diarrhea: epidemiology and pathogenesis. Epidemiol Rev. 1984;6:31-51. [218] Taylor CJ, Hart A, Batt RM, et al. Ultrastructural and biochemical changes in human jejunal mucosa associated with enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (0111) infection. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1986;5(1):70-3. [219] Sherman P, Drumm B, Karmali M, et al. Adherence of bacteria to the intestine in sporadic cases of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli-associated diarrhea in infants and young children: a prospective study. Gastroenterology. 1989;96(1):86-94.

46 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Gomes and González-Pedrajo

[220] Rothbaum RJ, Partin JC, Saalfield K, et al. An ultrastructural study of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection in human infants. Ultrastruct Pathol. 1983;4(4):291-304. [221] Clausen CR, Christie DL. Chronic diarrhea in infants caused by adherent enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Pediatr. 1982;100(3):358-61. [222] Boedeker E. Enteroadherent (enteropathogenic) Escherichia coli. London: Chapman and Hall; 1988. [223] Donnenberg MS, Tacket CO, James SP, et al. Role of the eaeA gene in experimental enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection. J Clin Invest. 1993;92(3):1412-7. [224] Silva ML, Giampaglia CM. Colostrum and human milk inhibit localized adherence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to HeLa cells. Acta Paediatr. 1992;81(3):266-7. [225] Sanches MI, Keller R, Hartland EL, et al. Human colostrum and serum contain antibodies reactive to the intimin-binding region of the enteropathogenic Escherichia coli translocated intimin receptor. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;30(1):73-7. [226] Parissi-Crivelli A, Parissi-Crivelli JM, Giron JA. Recognition of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli virulence determinants by human colostrum and serum antibodies. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(7):2696-700. [227] Palmeira P, Carbonare SB, Silva ML, et al. Inhibition of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) adherence to HEp-2 cells by bovine colostrum and milk. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2001;29(6):229-37. [228] Nagao AT, Friedlander-Del Nero D, Arslanian C, et al. Elevated levels and different repertoire profile of colostral antiLPS antibodies may have a significant role in compensating newborn immunity. Scand J Immunol. 2001;53(6):602-9. [229] Martinez MB, Taddei CR, Ruiz-Tagle A, et al. Antibody response of children with enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection to the bundle-forming pilus and locus of enterocyte effacement-encoded virulence determinants. J Infect Dis. 1999;179(1):269-74. [230] Loureiro I, Frankel G, Adu-Bobie J, et al. Human colostrum contains IgA antibodies reactive to enteropathogenic Escherichia coli virulence-associated proteins: intimin, BfpA, EspA, and EspB. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1998;27(2):166-71. [231] Donnenberg MS, Tacket CO, Losonsky G, et al. Effect of prior experimental human enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection on illness following homologous and heterologous rechallenge. Infect Immun. 1998;66(1):52-8. [232] Cravioto A, Tello A, Villafan H, et al. Inhibition of localized adhesion of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to HEp-2 cells by immunoglobulin and oligosaccharide fractions of human colostrum and breast milk. J Infect Dis. 1991;163(6):1247-55. [233] Costa-Carvalho BT, Bertipaglia A, Sole D, et al. Detection of immunoglobulin (IgG and IgA) anti-outer-membrane proteins of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) in saliva, colostrum, breast milk, serum, cord blood and amniotic fluid. Study of inhibition of localized adherence of EPEC to HeLa cells. Acta Paediatr. 1994;83(8):870-3. [234] Carbonare CB, Carbonare SB, Carneiro-Sampaio MM. Early acquisition of serum and saliva antibodies reactive to enteropathogenic Escherichia coli virulence-associated proteins by infants living in an endemic area. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2003;14(3):222-8. [235] Camara LM, Carbonare SB, Silva ML, et al. Inhibition of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) adhesion to HeLa cells by human colostrum: detection of specific sIgA related to EPEC outer-membrane proteins. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1994;103(3):307-10. [236] Palmeira P, Costa-Carvalho BT, Arslanian C, et al. Transfer of antibodies across the placenta and in breast milk from mothers on intravenous immunoglobulin. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2009;20(6):528-35. [237] Zhou X, Giron JA, Torres AG, et al. Flagellin of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli stimulates interleukin-8 production in T84 cells. Infect Immun. 2003;71(4):2120-9. [238] Nataro JP, Baldini MM, Kaper JB, et al. Detection of an adherence factor of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli with a DNA probe. J Infect Dis. 1985;152(3):560-5. [239] Muller D, Greune L, Heusipp G, et al. Identification of unconventional intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolates expressing intermediate virulence factor profiles by using a novel single-step multiplex PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(10):3380-90. [240] Baldini MM, Kaper JB, Levine MM, et al. Plasmid-mediated adhesion in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1983;2(3):534-8. [241] Aranda KR, Fabbricotti SH, Fagundes-Neto U, et al. Single multiplex assay to identify simultaneously enteropathogenic, enteroaggregative, enterotoxigenic, enteroinvasive and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains in Brazilian children. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007;267(2):145-50. [242] Nara JM, Cianciarullo AM, Culler HF, et al. Differentiation of typical and atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli using colony immunoblot for detection of bundle-forming pilus expression. J Appl Microbiol. 2010;109(1):35–43. [243] Knutton S, Baldwin T, Williams PH, et al. Actin accumulation at sites of bacterial adhesion to tissue culture cells: basis of a new diagnostic test for enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 1989;57(4):1290-8.

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC)

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 47

[244] Senerwa D, Mutanda LN, Gathuma JM, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains from a nosocomial outbreak in Kenya. Apmis. 1991;99(8):728-34. [245] Scaletsky IC, Souza TB, Aranda KR, et al. Genetic elements associated with antimicrobial resistance in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) from Brazil. BMC Microbiol. 2010;10:25. [246] Moyenuddin M, Wachsmuth IK, Moseley SL, et al. Serotype, antimicrobial resistance, and adherence properties of Escherichia coli strains associated with outbreaks of diarrheal illness in children in the United States. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27(10):2234-9. [247] Gross RJ, Rowe B, Threlfall EJ. Escherichia coli 0142.H6; a drug-resistant enteropathogenic clone? J Hyg (Lond). 1985;94(2):181-91. [248] Nwaneshiudu AI, Mucci T, Pickard DJ, et al. A second large plasmid encodes conjugative transfer and antimicrobial resistance in O119:H2 and some typical O111 enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains. J Bacteriol. 2007;189(16):6074-9. [249] Giles C, Sangster G, Smith J. Epidemic gastro-enteritis of infants in Aberdeen during 1947. Arch Dis Child. 1949;24(117):45-53. [250] Robins-Browne RM, Still CS, Miliotis MD, et al. Summer diarrhoea in African infants and children. Arch Dis Child. 1980;55(12):923-8. [251] Boesman-Finkelstein MF, Finkelstein RA. Antimicrobial effects of human milk: inhibitory effect on enteric pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1985;27:167-74. [252] Sobel J, Gomes TA, Ramos RT, et al. Pathogen-specific risk factors and protective factors for acute diarrheal illness in children aged 12-59 months in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38(11):1545-51. [253] Horne C, Vallance BA, Deng W, et al. Current progress in enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2002;1(4):483-93. [254] Silva J, Garcia A, Flores V, et al. Phytosecretion of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to HeLa cells. Acta Paediatr Scand. 2002;81:266-7. [255] Agin TS, Zhu C, Johnson LA, et al. Protection against hemorrhagic colitis in an animal model by oral immunization with isogeneic rabbit enteropathogenic Escherichia coli attenuated by truncating intimin. Infect Immun. 2005;73(10):6608-19. [256] Cantey JR, Blake RK. Diarrhea due to Escherichia coli in the rabbit: a novel mechanism. J Infect Dis. 1977;135(3):45462. [257] Zhu C, Feng S, Thate TE, et al. Towards a vaccine for attaching/effacing Escherichia coli: a LEE encoded regulator (ler) mutant of rabbit enteropathogenic Escherichia coli is attenuated, immunogenic, and protects rabbits from lethal challenge with the wild-type virulent strain. Vaccine. 2006;24(18):3845-55. [258] Zhu C, Feng S, Yang Z, et al. LEE-encoded regulator (Ler) mutants elicit serotype-specific protection, but not cross protection, against attaching and effacing E. coli strains. Vaccine. 2007;25(10):1884-92. [259] Ferreira PC, Campos IB, Abe CM, et al. Immunization of mice with Lactobacillus casei expressing intimin fragments produces antibodies able to inhibit the adhesion of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to cultivated epithelial cells. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2008;54(2):245-54. [260] Keller R, Hilton TD, Rios H, et al. Development of a live oral attaching and effacing Escherichia coli vaccine candidate using Vibrio cholerae CVD 103-HgR as antigen vector. Microb Pathog. 2010;48(1):1-8. [261] Luan J, Zhuang Z, Liu Y, et al. Expression of EspA in Lactococcus lactis NZ9000 and the detection of its immune effect in vivo and vitro. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2010;32(1):133-40.

48

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America, 2010, 48-64

CHAPTER 4 Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli Fernando Navarro-Garcia1*, Waldir P Elias2, Jose Flores3 and Pablo C Okhuysen3 1

Department of Cell Biology, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN (CINVESTAV-IPN), México DF, Mexico;  2Laboratory of Bacteriology, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; 3Division of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas at Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA Abstract: Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) have been identified in children and adults living in developed and developing countries as well as in travelers returning from developing countries and in patients infected with HIV. In addition to the acute complications of diarrhea, such as dehydration and death, EAEC can also cause persisting diarrhea that can lead in turn to malnutrition and impaired growth and development in children. EAEC strains are defined by the ability to produce a “stacked brick” appearance when placed on HEp-2 epithelial cells in culture, and contaminated food appears to be the main source of EAEC infection. EAEC are genetically heterogeneous. EAEC strain 042 is the prototypical strain for the study of virulence factors and pathogenicity; however, emergence of atypical EAEC has been described. Three major features of EAEC pathogenesis have been defined; abundant adherence to the intestinal mucosa, elaboration of enterotoxins and cytotoxins, and induction of mucosal inflammation. Infection with strains that possess specific virulence factors correlate with elevated levels of fecal cytokines and inflammatory markers. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of EAEC infection remains limited to research laboratories and therefore, are of little use in guiding antibiotic therapy. EAEC induce short-term immunity in healthy individuals which suggests that immunoprophylaxis is a potential option for control of EAEC.

INTRODUCTION The pathogenesis and protective immunity to enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) and diffusely adhering E. coli (DAEC) are the poorest understood compared to the other four diarrheagenic categories: enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) and enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC) [1]. Considerable advances have been made on the understanding of pathogenesis and prevention of these last four categories, even though diarrheagenic E. coli is still loosely classified into these six major categories based on clinical associations, serotyping, phenotypic assays and identification of virulence characteristics.

Figure 1: The adherence pattern of enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) to HEp-2 cells. EAEC adheres to HEp-2 cells in a pattern known as auto-aggregative, in which bacteria adhere to each other in a 'stacked-brick' configuration.

A common feature that defines EAEC strains is the ability to produce a “stacked brick” appearance (Fig. 1) when placed on HEp-2 epithelial cells in culture [1]. This phenotype is derived from the ability of EAEC to attach to other EAEC, to the epithelial cells, and to the surface of tissue culture plates. At the molecular level (described later in this *Address correspondence to: Dr. Fernando Navarro-Garcia. Department of Cell Biology, CINVESTAV-IPN, Ap. Postal 14-740, 07000 México DF, Mexico. Tel: (52-55) 5747-3990. Fax: (52-55) 5747-3393. E-mail: [email protected] Alfredo G. Torres (Ed) All rights reserved - © 2010 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 49

chapter in detail) the aggregative phenotype determinants (also referred to as the AA phenotype) of EAEC are contained in a large plasmid (pAA) that carries a number of virulence genes that are under the control of the master aggR regulator. Shortly after the initial description of EAEC in 1987 by Nataro et al. [2] an empirically derived probe originally denominated CVD432 or AA was developed in the early 1990’s by Baudry et al. [3] and served as the basis for a PCR based assay a few years later [4]. This AA probe was later shown to hybridize with a region of in the pAA coding for an ABC transporter apparatus that is needed to translocate the antiaggregative protein dispersin across the bacterial cell membrane [5] The study of EAEC experienced a breakthrough in 1994, when the ability of this pathotype to cause diarrhea was left in no doubt when a volunteer study demonstrated that the prototypic EAEC strain 042, originally identified in a child with diarrhea in Peru, elicited diarrhea in the majority of volunteers challenged with 109 c.f.u. in a study at the Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland [6]. However, volunteers exposed to other EAEC strains in this challenge study did not develop diarrhea. This provided initial insights into the variable and complex pathogenesis of EAEC. EAEC strain 042 (serotype O44:H18), which caused diarrhea in the healthy volunteer challenge, became then the prototypical EAEC strain for the study of virulence factors and EAEC pathogenicity [6] and was the subject of a recent EAEC genome characterization [7]. Thus, the majority of the virulence factors described in EAEC have been characterized in the EAEC prototype strain 042. Epidemiologic studies showed that the majority of isolates hybridizing with the AA probe also contained the master aggR regulator and that EAEC isolates that hybridized with the AA probe were found to be associated with persisting diarrhea in case-controlled studies. However, it was also noted that not all EAEC strains causing diarrhea hybridized with primers specific for aggR. This led to the suggestion that EAEC be classified into “typical” EAEC when aggR is present and “atypical” EAEC when aggR is absent [8]. The literature thus, contains studies on EAEC that rely solely on the aggregative phenotypic HEp-2 assay, solely on the use of molecular probes and yet others that use a combination of these two approaches to identify EAEC. The heterogeneity among strains from geographically diverse regions not conforming to these characteristics further complicates the classification of EAEC into discrete groups [9] and will likely require of a reclassification in the near future. EPIDEMIOLOGY AND IMPACT IN LATIN AMERICA EAEC has been identified in all regions of the world where it has been studied. Children and adults living in developing countries [10-14], as well as travelers returning from developing countries are susceptible to infection with EAEC [15, 16]. EAEC can also result in persisting asymptomatic infection in adults and children [17, 18]. In the US, a recent study showed that gene probe positive EAEC but not EAEC defined by HEp-2 adherence, was more commonly identified in children under the age of five with acute diarrhea than in age matched healthy controls [19-21]. Although atypical EAEC has been identified in calves, piglets and horses [22], animals have not been implicated as a source or reservoir for human infection. Contaminated food appears to be the main source of EAEC infection and has been implicated in several food borne outbreaks of diarrhea [23, 24] in several parts of the world. In Mexico, EAEC is commonly found in food, including desserts and salsa [25, 26] and may explain the high rates of travelers’ diarrhea seen in US visitors to that country. Also, in Brazil EAEC was detected in the lacteal contents of feeding bottles of low socio-economic class infants brought to the outpatient clinic of a public hospital, demonstrating the possible transmission of EAEC by contaminated food [27]. In Latin America, EAEC is among the most common bacterial isolates recovered from children with diarrhea and has been identified in Colombia [28], Mexico [29, 30], Guatemala [31], Brazil [10, 11, 32-42], Chile [43], Peru [44], Argentina [45], Ecuador [46] and Jamaica [16]. In some areas of Brazil, EAEC surpasses ETEC as the predominant pathogen identified [47].

50 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Navarro-Garcia et al.

In addition to the acute complications of diarrhea such as dehydration and death, EAEC can also cause persisting diarrhea [48] that can lead in turn to malnutrition and impaired growth and development. Steiner and colleagues demonstrated that in Brazilian slums, infections with EAEC were associated with intestinal inflammation as evidenced by elevated levels of fecal cytokines including IL-8 and that even in the absence of diarrhea, infection with EAEC led to impaired growth and development [49]. EAEC has also been associated with chronic diarrhea in patients infected with HIV [17, 50-55]. Although studies in Africa linked EAEC to persistent and bloody diarrhea in HIV associated infection [52], there is a paucity of data on the prevalence or complications associated with HIV-related EAEC infection in Latin America. In developed countries, diarrhea due to opportunistic pathogens in patients with HIV has decreased dramatically in response to the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy and this may also be the case in Latin America. EAEC can be identified in 19% to 33% of traveler’s diarrhea cases depending on the region of the world visited [16, 56-58]. In Latin America, the proportion of EAEC associated cases of travelers' diarrhea is seen in 25% of travelers, which is significantly higher to the rates observed in travelers visiting Africa, where the proportion is less than 2%, and south Asia (15%) [59]. Unlike ETEC, which causes diarrhea within the first two weeks of travel and is not associated with asymptomatic carriage in US visitors to Mexico, EAEC infection can persist for longer periods of time [60]. EAEC PATHOGENESIS Once ingested, the localization of infection in the gastrointestinal tract has not been well defined. EAEC infection has been associated with increased nitric oxide production and alterations in lactulose permeability in aboriginal children in Australia [61]. Studies done on endoscopic intestinal specimens demonstrate that EAEC can bind to jejunal, ileal, and colonic epithelium [62]. Studies in volunteers have demonstrated that EAEC 042 can be recovered from duodenal aspirates [6]. In a separate study, organ cultures of small and large intestinal mucosa from children were used to examine the interactions of EAEC with human intestine. In this study, five EAEC strains were evaluated for their ability to bind to jejunal, ileal, and colonic mucosa. The affinity for segments of the intestinal tract was heterogeneous among the EAEC isolates studied [63]. Although a great diversity of adhesins, toxins and proteins involved in EAEC pathogenesis have been described, the prevalence of these virulence factors-encoding genes is highly variable and none of these have been found in all EAEC strains [33, 40, 64-68]. In addition to the expression of adhesins and toxins, several other potential virulence factors have been described in EAEC which are encoded in plasmids or in the chromosome [69]. Nevertheless, pathogenesis studies have suggested three major features of EAEC pathogenesis: (i) abundant adherence to the intestinal mucosa, (ii) elaboration of enterotoxins and cytotoxins, and (iii) induction of mucosal inflammation (Fig. 2). Virulence Factors HyE EAST1 Pet Pic

Flagellin

ShET1 Dispersin Adhesins

EAEC

EA

EC AAFs

B

Vesicular traffic

Epithelial cell

A

B

IL-8 Inflammation

Targets Guanylyl Cyclase Adenylyl Cyclase Fodrin Membrane

A

Mucus

Figure 2: Schematic representation of enteroagregative E. coli virulence factors and their targets in the mucosal epithelium. Some of the targets of virulence factors are extrapolated from their known function in other pathogens o similarity to other factors (HylE, ShET1 and EAST1).

Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 51

Abundant Adherence to the Intestinal Mucosa Several authors demonstrated that the AA pattern is associated with the presence of fimbrial and afimbrial adhesins in EAEC strains. However, the genes encoding these adhesins are found in low prevalence, indicating a high diversity of adhesive structures responsible for the AA pattern [55, 70-76]. Afimbrial Adhesins Afimbrial adhesins, or outer membrane proteins (OMP) associated with the AA, have been observed in several EAEC strains of different serotypes [72, 74, 76, 77]. Debroy et al. [72] and Wai et al. [76], demonstrated that OMPs of 30 and 38 kDa, respectively, were responsible for the AA in some EAEC. A 18 kDa OMP present in EAEC strains belonging to serotypes O44:H18 and O126:H27, was associated with AA in HEp-2 cells and scum formation on broth cultures [77]. Spencer et al. [78] showed that the expression of that OMP also occurred in other serotypes that hybridized with the DAEC genetic probe described by Bilge et al. [79]. The mannose-resistant hemagglutination of human erythrocytes expressed by the prototype strain 042 in low temperature was associated with a 16 kDa OMP named cryohemagglutinin [80]. Monteiro-Neto et al. [74] described a 58 kDa OMP, named aggregative protein 58 (Ap58) responsible for the AA pattern of EAEC strains of the serotype O111:H12. The Ap58 adhesin is encoded by the ap58 gene located in the chromosome of the prototype strain 236. However, the distribution of Ap58 seems to be restricted to the O111:H12 serotype [74]. Recently, Bhargava et al. [81] reported the presence of an OMP adhesin (Hra1) in EAEC 042 that is an accessory factors involved in autoaggregation, biofilm formation and aggregative adherence, demonstrating the multifaceted adhesion and aggregation factors seen in this phenotype. Fimbrial Adhesins The presence of different fimbriae has been demonstrated in several EAEC strains employing electron microscopy studies [82-84]. Old et al. [85] described a fibrillar adhesin present in two strains of serogroup O78 able to mediate agglutination in rat and mice erythrocytes in the presence of mannose. Only a few of EAEC fimbriae have been genetically characterized, and certainly, the best studied are the Aggregative Adherence Fimbriae (AAFs) I, II and III [55, 71, 75]. AAF/I, II and III are encoded in high-molecular weight plasmids and are necessary for the expression of AA, in the prototype strains 17-2, 042 and 55989, respectively [55, 75, 86]. AAF/I is a flexible, bundle-forming fimbriae (2- to 3- nm diameter) responsible for the AA on HEp-2 cells and mannose-resistant hemagglutination of human erythrocytes [75]. In the prototype strain 17-2, the genes responsible for AAF/I biogenesis are located in two regions of the pAA1 plasmid, designated region 1 (containing the aggABCD operon that encodes the pilin, chaperonin and usher proteins) and region 2 (containing the AggR regulator-encoding gene) [75, 87, 88]. AAF/II was described in the prototype strain 042 as the adhesin responsible for the AA to HEp-2 cells and human colonic mucosa in tissue explants, as well as for biofilm formation in tissue cultures and polystyrene [71]. This fimbrial structure was observed as semi-rigid bundles of filaments (5-nm diameter) and detected by its ability to produce mannose-resistant hemagglutination of human erythrocyte [6]. The genes responsible for AAF/II biogenesis are also located in a high-molecular weight plasmid (pAA2) in two regions. However, these two regions show a unique fimbrial genetic organization, where the pilin-, chaperonin- and the regulator-encoding genes (aafA, aafD and aggR) are located in region 1, and the usher-encoding gene (aafC) takes place in region 2 [86]. These two regions are separated by a ~12-kb sequence harboring toxin-encoding genes [86]. The third AAF was identified in strain 55989 by Bernier et al. [55]. AAF/III is also involved in bacterial aggregation and AA to cultivated epithelial cells. Distinctly of AAF/I and II, AAF/III is long and individual flexible filaments. The genes responsible for AAF/III fimbria (agg-3ABCD and aggR) are organized in two regions similar to AAF/I genetic organization. Another fimbrial structure has been described in the atypical EAEC strain C1096. In this strain, the aggregative adherence to cultivated epithelial cells and to abiotic surfaces is mediated by a type IV pili, encoded by genes (operon pilLMNOPQRSTUV), located in a plasmid of the IncI1 incompatibility group. The gene pilS encodes the

52 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Navarro-Garcia et al.

major pili subunit [73, 89]. Recently, a new adhesin responsible for the AA in EAEC strains isolated in Denmark named Had has been described by Boisen et al. [70]. Had is responsible for the AA in EAEC strains lacking the AAFs. The ultrastructure of this adhesin has not been showed, however, the had gene has been previously described as encoding a pilin related to the Dr family of adhesins. A large number of EAEC strains lack the genes encoding these fimbriae, indicating that they express uncharacterized adhesins mediating the AA pattern [22, 33, 40, 65, 73, 90]. The EAEC heterogeneity in terms of fimbrial repertoire is similar to the observed among ETEC colonization factor antigens (CFA) [1]. Dispersin, Shf and Irp-2 Czeczulin et al. [65] identified several putative virulence genes in the pAA2 plasmid (strain 042) in addition to aafABCD-aggR (AAF/II-encoding genes), pet (Pet) and astA (EAST1). Among them are aspU or aap and shf. Dispersin is a 10.2 kDa immunogenic secreted protein encoded by the aap (anti-aggregation protein) gene, formerly known as aspU [65, 91]. This protein is secreted to the extra cellular milieu being covalently attached to the bacterial surface, neutralizing the negative charge of the bacterial surface and allowing the AAF/II projection [5, 91]. A 042 mutant in aap shows that dispersin acts decreasing bacterial autoaggregation allowing dispersion along the intestinal mucosa [91]. Dispersin secretion across the bacteria outer membrane is dependent of an ABC protein transporter system [92]. The shf gene shows homology with two genes described in Shigella flexneri 2a (shf1 e shf2), and encodes a predicted protein similar to IcaB of Staphylococcus epidermidis, related to biofilm formation [65, 93]. Besides pic and setAB (see below), the irp-2 gene was also localized in the 042 chromosome [65]. This gene encodes the iron-repressible high-molecular weight protein 2 (Irp-2) and is involved in the biosynthesis of a yersiniabactin responsible for iron acquisition in Yersinia [94]. Some authors showed a high prevalence of this gene among EAEC strains [22, 94], although, the role of Irp-2 in EAEC pathogenesis is unclear. Biofilm Formation Another characteristic of EAEC is the ability to form biofilm on biotic and abiotic surfaces in vitro, as result of bacterial aggregation [62, 63, 95, 96]. Biofilm of EAEC is a multifactorial phenotype distinct of the non-pathogenic E. coli biofilms [97]. It has been shown the involvement of AAF/II, type I fimbriae, Fis and YafK in the formation of biofilm by the prototype strain 042 [96, 98]. Fis is a DNA-binding protein involved in growth phase-dependent regulation and YafK is a secreted protein required for transcription of the genes involved in AAF/II biogenesis [96]. EAEC adherence to intestinal tissues is characterized as a biofilm composed by aggregates of bacteria in association with a thick mucus layer [62, 63, 95]. This characteristic biofilm formed by EAEC in vivo has been associated with the persistence of some cases of EAEC diarrhea [96, 99]. Invasion EAEC is considered a non-invasive pathogen, although some authors have demonstrated the invasive phenotype of some strains [90, 100, 101] using cells in culture. Benjamin et al. [101], showed that EAEC strains were internalized by HeLa cells, which was mediated by the cellular cytoskeleton components. Abe et al. [100] demonstrated the invasive phenotype to T84 cells and human colonic biopsies by the EAEC strain 236 (serotype O111:H12). These observations, in addition to the fact that children with EAEC diarrhea in Mexico can present bloody stools [29], suggest that the invasion ability of EAEC may be a virulence trait of at least some strains. Elaboration of Enterotoxins and Cytotoxins EAEC produces cytotoxic effects such as microvillus vesiculation, enlarged crypt openings, and increased epithelial cell extrusion [8]. Numerous putative virulence factors such as the plasmid-encoded Pet and EAST-1 toxins [102, 103]; the chromosomally encoded ShET1 toxin [104, 105], HlyE [106], Pic, a mucinase widely associated with pathogenic E. coli and Shigella spp [105], and a novel type VI secretion system [107] have been associated to these cytotoxic effects in EAEC. In an effort to identify cytotoxins and enterotoxins, Navarro-Garcia et al. [108] analyzed culture supernatants from strains that caused outbreaks of EAEC diarrhea in Mexican hospitals. Two major proteins of 108 and 116 kDa (now

Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli

Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America 53

known as Pet and Pic, respectively) were secreted. Interestingly, Pet and Pic are secreted by EAEC using the type V secretion system or also called autotransporter mechanism, and belong to the serine protease autotransporter of Enterobacteriaceae family. Thus, both proteins undergo two cleavage steps before a functional protein is released into the extracellular space. The passenger domains contain the protease motif (GDSGSP) characteristic of all proteins of the SPATE group [109]. Plasmid-encoded Toxin (Pet) It has been shown that a 104 kDa protein, termed Pet (plasmid-encoded toxin), is required for EAEC-induced damage to human intestinal mucosa [108]. Pet is a member of the autotransporter class of secreted proteins and together with Tsh, EspP, EspC, Pic, SigA, Hbp, Sat and SepA proteins comprises the serine protease autotransporter of Enterobacteriaceae (SPATE) subfamily. The defining feature of autotransporters is their self-contained secretion system [102]. Pet causes raises in Isc (short-circuit current) and decreases in electrical resistance of rat jejunum mounted in the Ussing chamber, an enterotoxic effect that is accompanied by mucosal damage, increased mucus release, exfoliation of cells and development of crypt abscesses [108]. Pet appears to be a cytoskeleton-altering toxin, since it induces contraction of the cytoskeleton, loss of actin stress fibers, and release of focal contacts in HEp-2 and HT29/C1 cell monolayers, followed by complete cell rounding and detachment. Interestingly, Pet cytotoxicity and enterotoxicity depend on Pet serine protease activity, since both effects are inhibited by phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and are not induced by Pet S260I, which is mutated in the catalytic serine and thereby lacks in vitro protease activity [110]. It has been shown that Pet enters the eukaryotic cell and that trafficking through the vesicular system appears to be required for the induction of cytopathic effects. Moreover, the Pet serine protease motif is the main requisite for the cytopathic effects, because the internalization assays have demonstrated that Pet and mutant S260I are found inside epithelial cells, but that only native Pet produces the cytopathic effects [111]. All these data suggest an intracellular target for Pet. Indeed, Pet produces degradation of erythroid spectrin [112]. Pet internalization by clathrin-coated vesicles was found to be the essential mechanism because two reagents for blocking this pathway totally inhibited Pet internalization (monodansylcadaverine and sucrose). Whereas drugs for blocking endocytosis (filipin and methyl--ciclodextrin), through caveolae mechanism, was unable to inhibit Pet effects on the cytoskeleton. Moreover, small interfering RNA (siRNA), designed to knock down clathrin gene expression in HEp-2 cells, prevented Pet internalization, and thereby the Pet-induced cytotoxic effect. However, the use of siRNA to knock down caveolin expression had no effect on Pet internalization, and the cytotoxic effect was clearly observed [113]. Pet endocytosis is a rapid event in HEp-2 cells, since it is possible to find Pet in early endosomes, as short as 8 min after the initial interaction. This rapid Pet endocytic process has also been observed in various bacterial toxins, in which, after endocytosis through clathrin-dependent or -independent mechanisms, toxins are delivered to early endosomes and a small fraction is subsequently delivered to lysosomes for its degradation. In the endocytic transport of Pet, it is possible to observe that a small fraction reached the lysosomes for its possible degradation. However, most of Pet followed a transport to other organelles [114]. Furthermore, brefeldin A (BFA) is able to inhibit the cytoskeletal effects caused by Pet. BFA disrupts the Golgi apparatus and causes multiple alterations in the vesicular transport. Inhibition of cell intoxication by BFA is classically associated with toxins, which undergo retrograde transport from the Golgi apparatus to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), such as Cholera toxin, Shiga toxin and ricin [111]. These findings were confirmed by localizing Pet in the Golgi apparatus at sequential times and then in the ER. ER is an attractive compartment for translocation, since it contains factors that facilitate entry to the cytosol by reducing or displaying proteins before their departure from the ER membrane. Additionally, the ER contains a protein of machinery for translocation, named Sec61p, which is involved in the reverse translocation of misfolded proteins from the ER lumen to the cytosol. The Sec61p translocon complex appears to be responsible in this essential pathway for the intoxication by diverse toxins, since they have the ability to associate with the Sec61p complex, such as the A subunit of ricin, Pseudomonas exotoxin A, and Cholera toxin. Thus, Pet is able to colocalize with Sec61α, the major protein in the Sec61p complex, and this colocalization occurred immediately after Pet localization in the ER. Additionally, antibodies against Sec61α were able to precipitate Pet and antibodies against Pet immunoprecipite Sec61. Furthermore, Pet is unable to intoxicate

54 Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America

Navarro-Garcia et al.

mutant CHO cells (cholera toxin resistant), which have translocation defects [114]. Finally, Pet colocalizes with one of its intracellular targets, fodrin. An intracellular target, -fodrin (II spectrin), has been found for Pet. Pet binds and cleaves epithelial fodrin (between M1198 and V1199) in vitro and in vivo, causing fodrin redistribution within the cells, to form intracellular aggregates as membrane blebs. Interestingly, both enterotoxic and cytotoxic effects depended upon the serine protease motif, the active site used for α-fodrin degradation. Furthermore, Pet internalization is needed to produce the cytotoxic and cytoskeletal damage, since α-fodrin is an intracellular protein. Thus, this mechanism appears to be a new system of cellular damage identified in bacterial toxin, which includes the internalization of the protease to allow finally