Third Edition
Fats Oils and
Formulating and Processing for Applications
Third Edition
Fats Oils and
Formulating and Processing for Applications Richard D. O’Brien
CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742 © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business No claim to original U.S. Government works Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-4200-6166-6 (Hardcover) This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint. Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers. For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged. Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data O’Brien, Richard D. Fat and oils : formulating and processing for applications / Richard D. O’Brien. -- 3rd ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-1-4200-6166-6 ISBN-10: 1-4200-6166-6 1. Oils and fats, Edible. I. Title. TP670.O27 2009 664’.3--dc22 Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at http://www.taylorandfrancis.com and the CRC Press Web site at http://www.crcpress.com
2008020476
Contents Third Edition Preface...............................................................................................xix Chapter 1 Raw Materials............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7
1.8 1.9 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16
Introduction...................................................................................................... 1 Sources of Fats and Oils.................................................................................. 2 Vegetable Oil Yields........................................................................................ 2 Availability of Fats and Oils............................................................................ 4 United States Utilization of Edible Fats and Oils............................................ 4 Characterization of Fats and Oils.................................................................... 7 Nonglyceride Components of Fats and Oils.................................................... 8 1.7.1 Phospholipids...................................................................................... 8 1.7.2 Tocopherols and Tocotrienols............................................................. 9 1.7.3 Sequalene.......................................................................................... 10 1.7.4 Sterols............................................................................................... 10 1.7.5 Pigments............................................................................................ 12 1.7.6 Pesticides........................................................................................... 13 1.7.7 Trace Metals...................................................................................... 13 Genetically Modified Vegetable Oils............................................................. 13 Soybean Oil.................................................................................................... 15 1.9.1 Soybean Oil Composition and Physical Properties.......................... 17 1.9.2 Genetically Modified Soybean Oil................................................... 18 Cottonseed Oil............................................................................................... 19 1.10.1 Cottonseed Oil Composition and Physical Properties......................20 1.10.2 Genetically Modified Cottonseed Oil............................................... 22 Peanut Oil....................................................................................................... 22 1.11.1 Peanut Oil Composition and Physical Properties............................. 23 1.11.2 Genetically Modified Peanut Oil......................................................25 Corn Oil.........................................................................................................25 1.12.1 Corn Oil Composition and Physical Properties................................26 1.12.2 Genetically Modified Corn Oil.........................................................28 Sunflower Oil.................................................................................................28 1.13.1 Sunflower Oil Composition and Physical Properties........................ 29 NuSun Sunflower Oil..................................................................................... 30 1.14.1 NuSun Composition and Physical Properties................................... 31 High-Oleic Sunflower Oil.............................................................................. 32 1.15.1 High-Oleic Sunflower Oil Physical Properties and Composition............................................................................... 32 Safflower Oil.................................................................................................. 33 1.16.1 Safflower Oil Composition and Physical Properties......................... 33
v
vi
Contents
1.17 High-Oleic Safflower Oil............................................................................... 35 1.17.1 High-Oleic Safflower Oil Composition and Physical Characteristics.................................................................................. 35 1.18 Canola Oil...................................................................................................... 37 1.18.1 Canola Oil Composition and Physical Properties............................. 37 1.18.2 Genetically Modified Canola Oil...................................................... 39 1.19 Olive Oil.........................................................................................................40 1.19.1 Olive Oil Composition and Physical Properties............................... 41 1.20 Palm Oil......................................................................................................... 43 1.20.1 Palm Oil Composition and Physical Properties................................ 43 1.20.2 Genetically Modified Palm Oil......................................................... 47 1.21 Coconut Oil.................................................................................................... 48 1.21.1 Coconut Oil Composition and Physical Properties........................... 48 1.22 Palm Kernel Oil............................................................................................. 50 1.22.1 Palm Kernel Oil Composition and Physical Properties.................... 51 1.23 Lard................................................................................................................ 52 1.23.1 Lard Physical Properties and Composition....................................... 53 1.24 Tallow............................................................................................................. 55 1.24.1 Tallow Physical Properties and Composition................................... 56 1.25 Milk Fat.......................................................................................................... 58 1.25.1 Milk Fat Physical Properties and Composition................................ 58 1.26 Menhaden Oil.................................................................................................60 1.27 Single Cell Oils..............................................................................................64 1.27.1 Microalgae Oils................................................................................64 1.27.2 Fungal Oil......................................................................................... 65 References............................................................................................................66 Chapter 2 Fats and Oils Processing........................................................................................... 73 2.1 2.2
2.3 2.4
Introduction.................................................................................................... 73 Fats and Oils Recovery.................................................................................. 74 2.2.1 Oilseed Extraction............................................................................ 74 2.2.1.1 Expeller or Screw Press Extraction................................... 76 2.2.1.2 Prepress Solvent Extraction............................................... 77 2.2.1.3 Direct Solvent Extraction.................................................. 77 2.2.2 Oil-Bearing Fruit Extraction............................................................. 78 2.2.2.1 Olive Oil Extraction.......................................................... 78 2.2.2.2 Palm Oil Extraction........................................................... 78 2.2.3 Animal Fat Recovery........................................................................ 79 2.2.3.1 Wet Rendering................................................................... 79 2.2.3.2 Dry Rendering................................................................... 79 Refining Systems............................................................................................80 Physical Refining...........................................................................................80
Contents
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
vii
Refining Pretreatment.................................................................................... 83 2.5.1 Water Degumming............................................................................84 2.5.2 Acid Degumming............................................................................. 85 2.5.3 Dry Degumming............................................................................... 86 2.5.4 Enzymatic Degumming.................................................................... 86 2.5.5 Modified Acid Degumming.............................................................. 87 2.5.6 Membrane Filter Degumming.......................................................... 87 Chemical Refining......................................................................................... 88 2.6.1 Short-Mix Caustic Refining..............................................................92 2.6.2 Miscella Refining..............................................................................92 2.6.3 Batch Caustic Refining..................................................................... 95 2.6.3.1 Dry-Method Batch Refining.............................................. 95 2.6.3.2 Wet-Method Batch Refining..............................................96 2.6.4 Silica Refining...................................................................................96 2.6.5 Refining Efficiency...........................................................................97 2.6.6 Refining Byproducts......................................................................... 98 2.6.6.1 Soapstock Processing........................................................ 98 2.6.6.2 Hydrated Gums Processing............................................. 100 Prebleaching................................................................................................. 100 2.7.1 Procedure........................................................................................ 101 2.7.1.1 Batch Atmospheric.......................................................... 101 2.7.1.2 Batch Vacuum................................................................. 101 2.7.1.3 Continuous Vacuum........................................................ 101 2.7.2 Bleaching Agents............................................................................ 103 2.7.2.1 Natural Bleaching Earth.................................................. 103 2.7.2.2 Activated Bleaching Earth.............................................. 103 2.7.2.3 Reuse Spent Bleaching Earth.......................................... 104 2.7.2.4 Activated Carbon............................................................. 104 2.7.2.5 Silica Adsorbent.............................................................. 105 2.7.3 Bleaching Earth Dosage................................................................. 105 2.7.4 Temperature.................................................................................... 106 2.7.5 Time................................................................................................ 107 2.7.6 Moisture.......................................................................................... 107 2.7.7 Filtration.......................................................................................... 108 2.7.8 Bleaching Byproduct...................................................................... 109 Hydrogenation.............................................................................................. 110 2.8.1 Operating Variables........................................................................ 113 2.8.1.1 Temperature..................................................................... 113 2.8.1.2 Pressure........................................................................... 113 2.8.1.3 Agitation.......................................................................... 114 2.8.1.4 Catalyst Level.................................................................. 114 2.8.1.5 Catalyst Type................................................................... 114 2.8.1.6 Catalyst Poisons.............................................................. 115
viii
2.9
2.10
2.11 2.12
2.13 2.14 2.15
2.16 2.17
Contents
2.8.1.7 Catalyst Reuse................................................................. 116 2.8.1.8 Source Oils...................................................................... 116 2.8.2 Hydrogenation Systems................................................................... 116 2.8.3 Hydrogenation Control.................................................................... 118 2.8.4 Hydrogenated Basestock System.................................................... 119 Interesterification......................................................................................... 122 2.9.1 Chemical Rearrangement Catalyst................................................. 124 2.9.2 Endpoint Control............................................................................. 126 2.9.2.1 Melting Point................................................................... 126 2.9.2.2 Fiber Optic Spectrometer Monitoring............................. 126 2.9.2.3 Solids Fat Index............................................................... 127 2.9.2.4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry................................. 127 2.9.2.5 Glyceride Compositional Analysis.................................. 128 2.9.3 Random Chemical Interesterification Processes............................ 128 2.9.4 Directed Chemical Interesterification Process............................... 130 2.9.5 Enzymatic Interesterification.......................................................... 131 2.9.6 Interesterified Fats and Oils Applications...................................... 132 Winterization................................................................................................ 133 2.10.1 Classical Winterization Process..................................................... 133 2.10.2 Winterization Principle................................................................... 134 2.10.2.1 Source Oil Composition.................................................. 135 2.10.2.2 Cooling Rate.................................................................... 135 2.10.2.3 Crystallization Temperature............................................ 135 2.10.2.4 Agitation Rate................................................................. 135 2.10.2.5 Crystallization Time........................................................ 136 2.10.3 Solvent Winterization..................................................................... 136 2.10.4 Winterization Process Control Procedures..................................... 137 2.10.5 Winterization Applications............................................................. 138 Dewaxing..................................................................................................... 139 2.11.1 Dewaxing Process Control............................................................. 140 2.11.2 Dewaxing Applications................................................................... 140 Fractionation................................................................................................ 140 2.12.1 Dry Crystal Fractionation............................................................... 142 2.12.2 Detergent Fractionation.................................................................. 142 2.12.3 Solvent Fractionation...................................................................... 143 Postbleaching............................................................................................... 144 Cholesterol Stripping Process...................................................................... 145 Esterification or Alcoholysis........................................................................ 146 2.15.1 Mono- and Diglycerides................................................................. 146 2.15.1.1 Monoglyceride Derivatives............................................. 148 2.15.2 Polyglycerol Ester........................................................................... 150 2.15.3 Propylene Glycol Monoester........................................................... 152 Blending....................................................................................................... 152 Deodorization............................................................................................... 153 2.17.1 Operating Variables........................................................................ 154
Contents
2.18
2.19
2.20
2.21
ix
2.17.1.1 Vacuum............................................................................ 154 2.17.1.2 Temperature..................................................................... 154 2.17.1.3 Stripping Steam............................................................... 155 2.17.1.4 Retention Time................................................................ 156 2.17.2 Deodorization Systems................................................................... 156 2.17.2.1 Batch................................................................................ 156 2.17.2.2 Semicontinuous Deodorization....................................... 157 2.17.2.3 Continuous Deodorization.............................................. 158 2.17.3 Deodorizer Heating Systems.......................................................... 159 2.17.4 Deodorization Process Control....................................................... 160 2.17.5 Deodorizer Distillated.................................................................... 161 Finished Fats and Oils Handling................................................................. 164 2.18.1 Protection against Oxidative Deterioration.................................... 164 2.18.1.1 Nitrogen Blanketing........................................................ 164 2.18.1.2 Temperature Control....................................................... 165 2.18.1.3 Light Control................................................................... 166 2.18.1.4 Storage Time................................................................... 166 2.18.1.5 Antioxidant Addition....................................................... 166 2.18.1.6 Synergistic Antioxidant Mixtures................................... 168 2.18.2 Protection against Contamination.................................................. 169 Plasticization................................................................................................ 170 2.19.1 Plasticity of Edible Fats and Oils.................................................... 170 2.19.1.1 Product Composition....................................................... 170 2.19.1.2 Crystal Size..................................................................... 171 2.19.1.3 Supercooling.................................................................... 171 2.19.1.4 Mechanical Working....................................................... 172 2.19.1.5 Gas Incorporation............................................................ 172 2.19.2 Solidification Apparatus Evolutions............................................... 172 2.19.3 Shortening Plasticization Process................................................... 174 2.19.4 Liquid Shortening Crystallization.................................................. 176 2.19.5 Margarine Plasticization Process.................................................... 177 2.19.5.1 Stick Margarine............................................................... 180 2.19.5.2 Soft-Tub Margarine......................................................... 180 2.19.5.3 Whipped-Tub Margarine................................................. 181 2.19.5.4 Liquid Margarine............................................................ 181 2.19.5.5 Industrial Margarines...................................................... 182 2.19.6 Tempering....................................................................................... 182 2.19.6.1 Quick Tempering............................................................. 183 Flaking......................................................................................................... 185 2.20.1 Chill Rolls....................................................................................... 186 2.20.2 Flake Crystallization....................................................................... 186 2.20.3 Flaking Conditions......................................................................... 186 Powdered and Beaded Fats.......................................................................... 187 2.21.1 Spray Cooling................................................................................. 188
x
Contents
2.21.2 Flake Grinding................................................................................ 188 2.21.3 Spray Flaking and Grinding........................................................... 188 2.22 Salad and Cooking Oils Packaging.............................................................. 189 2.23 Bulk Oil Shipments...................................................................................... 189 2.23.1 Contamination................................................................................ 190 2.23.2 Overheating..................................................................................... 190 2.23.3 Air Exposure................................................................................... 190 References.......................................................................................................... 191 Chapter 3 Fats and Oils Analysis............................................................................................ 197 3.1 3.2
3.3
Introduction.................................................................................................. 197 Nonfatty Impurities...................................................................................... 198 3.2.1 Moisture Analysis........................................................................... 198 3.2.1.1 Hot Plate Method............................................................ 198 3.2.1.2 Air Oven Method............................................................ 199 3.2.1.3 Vacuum Oven Method..................................................... 199 3.2.1.4 Karl Fisher Method......................................................... 199 3.2.1.5 Skillet Moisture............................................................... 199 3.2.2 Impurities Analysis.........................................................................200 3.2.2.1 Insoluble Impurities.........................................................200 3.2.2.2 Filterable Impurities (Standard Disk Method)................200 3.2.2.3 Turbidimeter Impurities..................................................200 3.2.3 Trace Metals Analysis..................................................................... 201 3.2.4 Soap Analysis.................................................................................. 201 Melting, Solidification, and Consistency..................................................... 201 3.3.1 Melting Point Analysis....................................................................202 3.3.1.1 Capillary Melting Point...................................................202 3.3.1.2 Softening Point................................................................202 3.3.1.3 Slipping Point..................................................................202 3.3.1.4 Wiley Melting Point........................................................ 203 3.3.1.5 Mettler Dropping Point................................................... 203 3.3.2 Solid–Liquid Relationships............................................................. 203 3.3.2.1 Solids Fat Index...............................................................204 3.3.2.2 Solids Fat Content...........................................................204 3.3.2.3 Differential Scanning Calorimetry Fat Solids Content............................................................................206 3.3.3 Solidification Analysis....................................................................207 3.3.3.1 Titer.................................................................................207 3.3.3.2 Quick Titer......................................................................207 3.3.3.3 Congeal Point..................................................................207 3.3.3.4 Cloud Point......................................................................208 3.3.3.5 Cold Test..........................................................................208 3.3.3.6 Chill Test.........................................................................208
Contents
3.3.4
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
xi
Consistency Analysis......................................................................208 3.3.4.1 Consistency Ratings........................................................209 3.3.4.2 Penetrations.....................................................................209 Composition Analysis.................................................................................. 210 3.4.1 Saponification Value....................................................................... 211 3.4.2 Iodine Value.................................................................................... 211 3.4.3 Refractive Index.............................................................................. 212 3.4.4 Fatty Acid Composition.................................................................. 213 3.4.5 Calculated Iodine Value.................................................................. 214 3.4.6 Glyceride Structure......................................................................... 215 3.4.7 Emulsifier Analysis......................................................................... 215 3.4.8 Antioxidant Analysis...................................................................... 216 3.4.9 Tocopherol Analysis....................................................................... 216 Flavor, Rancidity, and Stability.................................................................... 217 3.5.1 Flavor Analysis............................................................................... 217 3.5.1.1 Sensory Evaluations........................................................ 218 3.5.1.2 Volatile Flavor Analysis.................................................. 219 3.5.2 Rancidity Analysis.......................................................................... 219 3.5.2.1 Peroxide Value................................................................. 219 3.5.2.2 Anisidine Value............................................................... 220 3.5.2.3 Free Fatty Acid and Acid Value...................................... 220 3.5.2.4 Smoke Point..................................................................... 221 3.5.3 Stability Analysis............................................................................ 221 3.5.3.1 Active Oxygen Method................................................... 222 3.5.3.2 Oil Stability Index........................................................... 223 3.5.3.3 Schaal Oven Test............................................................. 223 3.5.3.4 Pastry Flavor Test............................................................224 Color and Appearance.................................................................................224 3.6.1 Color................................................................................................ 225 3.6.1.1 Wesson Color Method..................................................... 225 3.6.1.2 Lovibond (British Standard)........................................... 225 3.6.1.3 Spectrophotometric Color Method for Oils.................... 226 3.6.1.4 Automatic Tintometers.................................................... 226 3.6.1.5 FAC (Fatty Acid Committee) Method............................. 226 3.6.1.6 Gardner Color.................................................................. 227 3.6.1.7 Chlorophyll...................................................................... 227 3.6.1.8 Coloring Agents Determination...................................... 227 3.6.2 Appearance..................................................................................... 227 3.6.2.1 Product Appearance Ratings........................................... 227 Refining and Bleaching................................................................................ 228 3.7.1 Refining Loss.................................................................................. 228 3.7.2 Neutral Oil and Loss....................................................................... 229 3.7.3 Bleaching Analysis......................................................................... 229 Performance Testing.................................................................................... 229 3.8.1 Creaming Volume........................................................................... 230
xii
Contents
3.8.2 Pound Cake Test............................................................................. 231 3.8.3 Icing Volume................................................................................... 231 3.8.4 White Layer Cakes.......................................................................... 232 3.8.5 Crème Filling Test.......................................................................... 232 3.8.6 Cake Mix Evaluation...................................................................... 233 3.8.7 Puff Pastry Testing.......................................................................... 233 3.8.8 Restaurant Deep-Fat Frying Evaluation......................................... 233 3.8.9 Ice Cream Bar Coating Evaluation................................................. 234 3.9 Nonstandardized Methods........................................................................... 234 References..........................................................................................................260 Chapter 4 Fats and Oils Formulation...................................................................................... 263 4.1 4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
Introduction.................................................................................................. 263 Oils and Fats Characteristics....................................................................... 265 4.2.1 Saturated Fatty Acids...................................................................... 265 4.2.1.1 Short-Chain Fatty Acids.................................................. 267 4.2.1.2 Medium-Chain Fatty Acids............................................. 267 4.2.1.3 Long-Chain Fatty Acids.................................................. 268 4.2.2 Unsaturated Fatty Acids................................................................. 269 4.2.2.1 Monounsaturated Fatty Acids......................................... 269 4.2.2.2 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids........................................... 270 4.2.3 Isomerized Fatty Acids................................................................... 273 4.2.3.1 Positional Isomers........................................................... 273 4.2.3.2 Trans Fatty Acids............................................................ 273 4.2.3.3 Conjugated Linoleic Fatty Acid (CLA)........................... 274 Palatability................................................................................................... 275 4.3.1 Oxidation........................................................................................ 276 4.3.1.1 Flavor Reversion..............................................................280 4.3.1.2 Antioxidants.................................................................... 281 4.3.2 Hydrolysis....................................................................................... 283 4.3.3 Mouth Feel...................................................................................... 283 Physical Characteristics............................................................................... 285 4.4.1 Fat Crystal Habit............................................................................. 285 4.4.2 Fat Plasticity.................................................................................... 288 4.4.3 Solid–Liquid Relationships............................................................. 289 4.4.3.1 Hydrogenation................................................................. 289 4.4.3.2 Random Interesterification.............................................. 291 4.4.3.3 Directed Interesterification............................................. 295 4.4.3.4 Fractionation.................................................................... 295 Nutritional Considerations........................................................................... 297 4.5.1 Nutritional Facts Panel.................................................................... 298 4.5.2 Health Claims................................................................................. 299 4.5.3 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.........................................300
Contents
xiii
4.5.4 Package Ingredient Statement.........................................................300 Basestock System......................................................................................... 301 Solids–Liquids Characteristics....................................................................302 4.7.1 Wide Plastic-Range Fats and Oils Products................................... 305 4.7.2 Steep Solid Fat Index Slopes...........................................................308 4.7.3 Liquid Opaque or Pumpable Products............................................ 311 4.8 Emulsification.............................................................................................. 312 4.8.1 Mono- and Diglycerides................................................................. 314 4.8.2 Propylene Glycol Esters.................................................................. 316 4.8.3 Sorbitan Esters................................................................................ 317 4.8.4 Polysorbate Fatty Acid Esters......................................................... 317 4.8.5 Polyglycerol Esters.......................................................................... 318 4.8.6 Lactated Esters................................................................................ 318 4.8.7 Lecithin........................................................................................... 319 4.8.8 Emulsifier Selection Methods......................................................... 320 4.8.8.1 Hydrophilic/Lipophilic Balance System......................... 320 4.8.8.2 Emulsifier Functionality Traits........................................ 323 4.8.8.3 Emulsifier Selection Procedure....................................... 324 4.9 Product Development................................................................................... 325 4.9.1 Application Product Development.................................................. 325 4.9.2 Analytical Development................................................................. 327 4.9.2.1 Solids Fat Index Calculations.......................................... 327 4.9.3 Triglyceride Replication.................................................................. 328 4.10 Source Oils and Fats Interchangeability...................................................... 333 4.11 Reduced Trans Fatty Acid Formulation....................................................... 334 4.12 Essential Fatty Acid Fortification................................................................ 337 4.12.1 Essential Fatty Acid Sources.......................................................... 337 4.12.2 Omega-3 Fortified Products............................................................ 338 References.......................................................................................................... 339 4.6 4.7
Chapter 5 Shortening Types.................................................................................................... 347 5.1
Introduction.................................................................................................. 347 5.1.1 Historical Background.................................................................... 347 5.1.2 Source Oils...................................................................................... 351 5.1.3 Shortening Product Forms.............................................................. 355 5.2 Plasticized Shortening Applications............................................................ 355 5.3 Liquid Shortening Applications................................................................... 357 5.4 Flakes, Chips, and Powdered Shortening Applications............................... 358 References.......................................................................................................... 359 Chapter 6 Baking Shortenings................................................................................................. 361 6.1
Introduction.................................................................................................. 361
xiv
Contents
6.2 All-Purpose Shortenings.............................................................................. 363 6.3 Emulsified All-Purpose Shortening............................................................. 368 6.4 Retail Cake Mix Shortenings....................................................................... 370 6.5 Specialty Bakery Cake Shortenings............................................................ 373 6.6 Liquid Cake Shortening............................................................................... 374 6.7 Icing and Filling Shortenings....................................................................... 376 6.8 Icing Stabilizers........................................................................................... 378 6.9 Bread Shortening......................................................................................... 379 6.10 Liquid Bread Shortenings............................................................................ 381 6.11 Sweet Yeast-Raised Dough Shortenings...................................................... 383 6.12 Cookie Shortenings...................................................................................... 384 6.13 Cookie Filler Shortenings............................................................................ 384 6.14 Pie Crust Shortenings................................................................................... 386 6.15 Biscuit Shortenings...................................................................................... 387 6.16 Danish Pastry Roll-In Shortenings.............................................................. 389 6.17 Puff Paste Roll-In Shortening...................................................................... 392 6.18 Shortening Chips.......................................................................................... 394 6.19 Cracker Shortenings..................................................................................... 395 References.......................................................................................................... 396 Chapter 7 Frying Shortenings................................................................................................. 399 7.1 7.2 7.3
Introduction.................................................................................................. 399 Frying Shortening Additives........................................................................402 Selection of Frying Shortening....................................................................404 7.3.1 Product Characteristics...................................................................405 7.3.2 Frying Life......................................................................................405 7.3.3 Shelf Life........................................................................................406 7.4 Foodservice Deep-Fat Frying Shortening Applications..............................407 7.4.1 Foodservice All-Purpose Shortening.............................................409 7.4.2 Animal–Vegetable Blended Frying Shortening.............................. 410 7.4.3 Heavy-Duty Vegetable Frying Shortenings.................................... 410 7.4.4 Liquid Frying Shortenings.............................................................. 411 7.4.5 Trait-Enhanced Vegetable Oils....................................................... 412 7.5 Foodservice Pan and Grill Shortenings....................................................... 414 7.6 Bakery Frying Shortening Applications...................................................... 416 7.6.1 Cake Donut Shortenings................................................................. 417 7.6.2 Yeast-Raised Fried Products........................................................... 419 7.6.3 Fried-Pie Shortenings..................................................................... 419 7.7 Snack Frying Shortening Applications........................................................ 420 7.7.1 Nut Meats Oil Roasting.................................................................. 422 References.......................................................................................................... 422
Contents
xv
Chapter 8 Dairy Analog Shortenings...................................................................................... 425 8.1 Introduction.................................................................................................. 425 8.2 Nondairy Creamer....................................................................................... 426 8.3 Whipped Topping......................................................................................... 429 8.4 Cheese Analog............................................................................................. 431 8.5 Frozen Dessert or Mellorine........................................................................ 432 8.6 Sour Cream Analog and Dip Bases............................................................. 433 8.7 Fluid Milk Analogs...................................................................................... 434 8.8 Sweetened Condensed Milk Analogs.......................................................... 434 References.......................................................................................................... 436 Chapter 9 Household Shortenings........................................................................................... 437 9.1 Introduction.................................................................................................. 437 9.2 Household Shortening Development............................................................ 437 9.3 Household Shortening Product Requirements............................................. 439 9.4 Household Shortening Formulation.............................................................440 9.5 Household Shortening Plasticization...........................................................444 9.6 Household Shortening Packaging................................................................444 References.......................................................................................................... 445 Chapter 10 Margarine................................................................................................................ 447 10.1 Introduction.................................................................................................. 447 10.2 Margarine Development............................................................................... 447 10.3 Margarine Formulation................................................................................ 453 10.3.1 Milk Products or Protein................................................................ 453 10.3.2 Emulsifiers...................................................................................... 454 10.3.3 Flavoring Materials......................................................................... 454 10.3.4 Preservatives................................................................................... 455 10.3.5 Vitamins and Color......................................................................... 455 10.3.6 Supplements for Health Claims...................................................... 456 10.3.7 Margarine Oils and Fats................................................................. 456 10.4 Low-Fat Margarine or Spread...................................................................... 457 10.5 Consumer Margarine Oil Formulations....................................................... 459 10.5.1 Margarine Oil Formulations with Hydrogenated Oils.................... 459 10.5.2 Margarine Oil Formulation with Interesterified Oils..................... 461 10.5.3 Margarine Oil Formulation with Fractionated Oils........................464 10.5.4 Margarine Oil Formulation with Unmodified Oils........................464
xvi
Contents
10.6 Industrial Margarine Formulations..............................................................465 10.7 Margarine and Spread Preparation..............................................................466 10.7.1 Stick Margarine or Spread.............................................................. 467 10.7.2 Soft Tub Margarine or Spread........................................................468 10.7.3 Whipped Tub Margarine or Spread................................................469 10.7.4 Liquid Margarine............................................................................469 10.7.5 Industrial Margarines or Spreads...................................................469 References.......................................................................................................... 470 Chapter 11 Liquid Oils.............................................................................................................. 473 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6
Introduction.................................................................................................. 473 Development of Liquid Oils......................................................................... 474 Cooking and Salad Oil Sources................................................................... 476 Retail Consumer Oils................................................................................... 479 Industrial Salad Oil Applications................................................................. 481 Mayonnaise.................................................................................................. 482 11.6.1 Mayonnaise Ingredients.................................................................. 483 11.6.1.1 Salad Oil.......................................................................... 483 11.6.1.2 Vinegar............................................................................ 485 11.6.1.3 Eggs................................................................................. 485 11.6.1.4 Flavoring Ingredients...................................................... 485 11.6.2 Mayonnaise Processing................................................................... 486 11.7 Spoonable Salad Dressing............................................................................ 487 11.8 Pourable Salad Dressings............................................................................. 488 11.8.1 French Dressing.............................................................................. 489 11.9 High-Stability Oils....................................................................................... 490 11.9.1 Processed High-Stability Oils........................................................ 490 11.9.2 Plant Breeding................................................................................ 490 11.9.3 High-Stability Oil Applications...................................................... 491 References.......................................................................................................... 492 Chapter 12 Quality Management.............................................................................................. 495 12.1 Introduction.................................................................................................. 495 12.2 Operating Standards.................................................................................... 496 12.3 Specifications............................................................................................... 496 12.3.1 Specifications Format..................................................................... 497 12.3.2 Ingredient Specifications................................................................ 499 12.3.2.1 Ingredient Specifications Format.................................... 501 12.3.3 Packaging Specifications................................................................ 502 12.3.3.1 Packaging Specifications Format.................................... 503 12.3.4 Product Specifications....................................................................504 12.3.4.1 Product Specifications Format........................................ 505
Contents
xvii
12.3.5 Customer Instruction Specifications...............................................506 12.3.5.1 Customer Instruction Specifications Format...................506 12.3.6 Summary Specifications................................................................. 508 12.3.6.1 Summary Specifications Format..................................... 508 12.4 Procedures....................................................................................................509 12.4.1 Procedures Format..........................................................................509 12.4.2 Quality Procedures.........................................................................509 12.4.2.1 Complaint Handling Procedure...................................... 510 12.4.2.2 Product Recall Procedure................................................ 511 12.4.2.3 Product Identification Procedures................................... 513 12.4.2.4 Specification Change Requisition................................... 515 12.4.2.5 New Product Approval Procedure.................................. 517 12.4.2.6 Weight Control Program................................................. 518 12.4.2.7 Quality Cost System........................................................ 518 12.4.2.8 Label Approval Procedure.............................................. 520 12.5 Methods........................................................................................................ 521 12.5.1 Methods Format.............................................................................. 522 12.6 Process Control Overview........................................................................... 524 12.7 Crude Fats and Oils Process Control........................................................... 526 12.8 Refining Process Control............................................................................. 527 12.9 Prebleaching Process Control...................................................................... 530 12.10 Modification Processes................................................................................ 532 12.10.1 Hydrogenation Process Control...................................................... 533 12.10.2 Interesterification Process Control.................................................. 535 12.10.2.1 Random Interesterification Using Chemical Catalyst..... 536 12.10.2.2 Random Interesterification Using Enzyme Catalyst....... 538 12.10.3 Fractionation Process Control......................................................... 539 12.10.3.1 Winterization Process Control........................................540 12.10.3.2 Dewaxing Process Control..............................................540 12.11 Postbleach Process Control.......................................................................... 542 12.12 Blending Process Control.............................................................................544 12.13 Deodorization Process Control....................................................................544 12.14 Bulk Shipment Process Control...................................................................546 12.15 Plasticized Shortening Packaging Process Control..................................... 547 12.16 Liquid Shortening Packaging Process Control............................................ 550 12.17 Liquid Oils Packaging Process Control....................................................... 552 12.18 Shortening Flake Process Control Standards.............................................. 554 12.19 Margarine and Spread Process Control Standards...................................... 556 References.......................................................................................................... 559 Chapter 13 Troubleshooting...................................................................................................... 561 13.1 Introduction.................................................................................................. 561 13.2 Process Troubleshooting.............................................................................. 563
xviii
Contents
13.2.1 Vegetable Oil Extraction................................................................. 563 13.2.2 Meat Fat Rendering......................................................................... 566 13.2.3 Crude Oil Storage........................................................................... 566 13.2.4 Degumming.................................................................................... 570 13.2.5 Caustic Oil Refining: Primary Centrifuge...................................... 571 13.2.6 Oil Refining: Water Wash............................................................... 574 13.2.7 Oil Refining: Vacuum Drying......................................................... 575 13.2.8 Prebleaching.................................................................................... 575 13.2.9 Hydrogenation................................................................................. 578 13.2.10 Interesterification............................................................................ 580 13.2.11 Postbleaching.................................................................................. 581 13.2.12 Winterization.................................................................................. 582 13.2.13 Dewaxing........................................................................................ 584 13.2.14 Esterification................................................................................... 585 13.2.15 Blending.......................................................................................... 588 13.2.16 Deodorization................................................................................. 589 13.2.17 Antioxidant Addition...................................................................... 598 13.2.18 Bulk Railroad Car or Truck Loading.............................................600 13.2.19 Oil Filling and Packaging...............................................................603 13.2.20 Packaged Liquid Oils: Storage and Transportation........................604 13.2.21 Shortening Packaging.....................................................................605 13.2.22 Liquid Opaque Shortenings............................................................ 611 13.2.23 Shortening Flakes........................................................................... 614 13.2.24 Packaged Shortening: Storage and Transportation......................... 621 13.2.25 Quality Control Laboratory............................................................ 622 13.2.26 Edible Fats and Oils: Organoleptic Evaluations............................. 624 13.2.27 Edible Fats and Oils Formulation................................................... 627 13.2.28 Edible Fats and Oils: Processed Oil Storage.................................. 629 13.3 Shortening Applications............................................................................... 629 13.3.1 Baking Shortening.......................................................................... 629 13.3.2 Frying Shortenings......................................................................... 633 13.4 Margarine and Spread Products...................................................................644 13.5 Quality Management.................................................................................... 649 References.......................................................................................................... 656 Index....................................................................................................................... 659
Third Edition Preface The objective of this edition remains the same as the two previous editions — to provide a practical reference for fats and oils processing and formulation for effective food processor, foodservice, and household applications. It is designed to be an information source for personnel and students of fats and oils processing as well as the personnel of the user industries. Most of the additions for this edition are related to nutrition. Dietary recommendations for fat and fatty acids continue to evolve as a better understanding of the role of dietary lipids in human health is gained. Processing and formulation techniques are reviewed to help determine how to achieve the most favorable nutritional characteristics while maintaining functionality for the various food applications. This book was designed to delve into the technical aspects that control the functional characteristics of fats and oils products, how these characteristics can be purified and/or modified to perform as needed, and the processing control necessary to produce these characteristics on a continuing uniform basis at the most economical cost. Applications development and quality management begin when the customer’s requirements are identified and continue through product design, sales, manufacturing, product costing, delivery, and service. A thorough understanding of the functions and properties of the various fats and oils products is the basic key to formulating for the desired attributes. Chapters dealing with the raw materials or source oils and fats, process performance and availability, evaluation techniques, formulation attributes, historic changes, and food applications were designed to provide the elements of formulation. Control of oil processing requires consideration of the problems associated with the properties of the raw materials and each process as well as the real and potential customer problems with the ingredients use. A quality management chapter was included to help establish when a system is in or out of control, and a troubleshooting chapter was included to help identify solutions to problems or at least stimulate the thought process for solving the problem. Fats and oils user industries have a vested interest in the development, processing, and quality control for shortening, margarine, and liquid oil products. The properties of the fat and oil ingredients are key elements in the performance and nutritional characteristics of most prepared food products. Fats and oils products for general use, specific applications, processes, nutritional contributions, and other functionalities have been successful due to the cooperative development efforts between fats and oil processors and food processors. Therefore, this text focuses on the formulation of fats and oils ingredients for food applications for food processor, foodservice, and household use. Information and materials for this book have been gathered over the past 45 years from patents, trade journals, personal experience, and exposure to many of the industry’s recognized leaders and other individuals who have taken a genuine pride in their work and the product produced.
xix
Chapter 1
Raw Materials
1.1 Introduction Fats and oils are the raw materials for liquid oils, shortenings, margarines, and other specialty or tailored products that are functional ingredients in food products prepared by food processors, restaurants, and in the home. Fats and oils have been used for food and a variety of other applications since prehistoric times, as they were easily isolated from their source. For example, fatty tissues from animals liberate free-floating fats on being boiled, whereas oil can be pressed from olives and oilseeds. Fats and oils found utility because of their unique properties. These ingredients were found to add flavor, lubricity, texture, and satiety to foods. They have also been found to have a major role in human nutrition. Fats and oils are the highest energy source of the three basic foods (carbohydrates, proteins, and fats), carriers for oil soluble vitamins, and many contain fatty acids essential for health that are not manufactured by the human body. Fats and oils occur naturally in a wide range of sources, with each source providing a separate and distinctive material. Hundreds of seeds and fruits contain oil, all animals produce fat, and marine sources also provide oils; however, only a few of these sources are of economic importance. All edible fats and oils are waterinsoluble substances that consist predominantly of glyceryl esters of fatty acids, or triglycerides, with some nonglyceridic materials present in small or trace quantities. The terms fats and oils are used interchangeably, and the choice of terms is usually based on the physical state of the material at ambient temperature and tradition. Generally, fats appear solid at ambient temperatures and oils appear liquid. In the final analysis, it is the chemical composition that defines the characteristics of the individual fat or oil, which, in turn, determines the suitability of this ingredient in various processes and applications.
1
2
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
1.2 Sources of Fats and Oils Humans have survived as hunters and gatherers for a majority of their known existence on Earth. It was only during the past 10,000 years that they learned to domesticate plants and animals. During this period, the evolution of cultivated plants has been shaped to the needs of modern humans. Today’s agricultural crops are mankind’s creation. Humans cannot survive without them, nor can the crops that have been developed survive without our care. The combined largest source of vegetable oils is the seeds of annual plants grown in relatively temperate climates. Most of these annual plants not only are cultivated as a source of oil, but are also utilized as protein-rich foods. A second source of vegetable oil is oil-bearing trees. Olive, coconut, and palm oils are extracted from the fruit pulp rather than the seed of the fruit. Palm also has seeds, which provide palm kernel oil. All of the oil-bearing tree fruits require a relatively warm climate (i.e., tropical for coconut and palm and a warm climate for olive trees). Most of the oil-bearing tree fruits and kernels provide the highest oil yields. Oil seeds are obtained from annual plants that must be replanted each year, whereas fruit oils are harvested from trees with long life spans. Olive trees are the most hardy and can survive to be several hundred years old. Coconut trees start to bear fruit after 5 to 6 years and their life expectancy is as long as 60 years. Palm trees start to bear fruit after 4 to 5 years and continue to do so for another 20 years. Edible meat fats are supplied almost entirely by three kinds of domesticated animals: lard from pigs, tallow from cattle and sheep, and milk fat or butter from cows. These animals are raised in the greatest quantities where they thrive the best — in temperate climates. Animal husbandry has evolved to the stage that these domestic animals require not only a temperate climate, but also intensive agriculture to provide a plentiful supply of foodstuffs to produce the desired quality and quantity.
1.3 VEGETABLE OIL YIELDS Fats and oils are renewable resources. The achievements of agriculture and plant cultivation have made it possible to exceed the demand resulting from world population growth. The major vegetable oil seeds and fruits utilized for edible purposes are listed in Table 1.1 with their typical oil contents, yield per acre of land, and major producing areas.1-3 Palm is unparalleled in oil yield. The palm oil yield of palm trees is 3150 to 3330 pounds per acre, and an additional yield of 350 to 370 pounds per acre of palm kernel oil is obtained from the same fruit bunch. Palm trees yield almost 10 times the soybean oil yield per acre. Most oil seeds are annual crops, and the harvest is seasonal; however, palm oil is a perennial crop with two crops produced per year. Coconut, also with a high oil content and yield, requires 9 to 12 months to mature, but fruit is available each month of the year. Olives mature annually and are the most delicate fruit; extraction must be performed as soon as possible to obtain quality oil. Olives have the lowest yield per acre of all the oils evaluated, even though their
Raw Materials
3
Table 1.1 Vegetable Oils: Oil Content, Yield, and Producing Areas Oil Source
Oil Content, %
Oil Yield, Lbs/Acre
Canola
40–45
647–728
Canada, China, India, France, Austria, United Kingdom, Germany, Poland, Belgium, Italy, Luxembourg, Republic of Ireland, Greece, Portugal, Spain, Denmark, Czechoslovakia, United States
Corn
3.1–5.7
215–390
United States, Mexico, Canada, Japan, China, Brazil, South Africa, Argentina, Russia, Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), Belgium, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, United Kingdom
Cottonseed
18–20
185–210
China, Russia, United States, India, Pakistan, CIS, Brazil, Egypt, Turkey, Australia
Peanut
45–50
1384–1538
China, India, Nigeria, United States, Senegal, South Africa, Argentina
Safflower
30–35
545–635
China, India, United States, Spain, Portugal
Soybean
18–20
456–506
United States, Brazil, Argentina, China, India, Paraguay, Bolivia
Sunflower
35–45
419–539
Russia, Argentina, CIS, Austria, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, United States, United Kingdom
Producing Areas
Oilseeds:
Tree fruits and kernels: Coconut
65–68
350–370
Philippines, Indonesia, India, Mexico, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Malaysia, Vietnam, Mozambique, New Guinea, Ivory Coast
Olive
15–35
90–260
Spain, Italy, Greece, Tunisia, Turkey, Morocco, Portugal, Syria, Algeria, Yugoslavia, Cyprus, Egypt, Israel, Libya, Jordan, Lebanon, Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Peru, United States, Australia
Palm
45–50
3150–3330
Malaysia, Indonesia, China, Philippines, Pakistan, Mexico, Bangladesh, Columbia, Ecuador, Nigeria, Ivory Coast
Palm kernel
44–53
350–370
Malaysia, Indonesia, China, Philippines, Pakistan, Mexico, Bangladesh, Columbia, Ecuador, Nigeria, Ivory Coast
oil content is about equivalent to cottonseed and much higher than corn germ. The production of one quart of olive oil requires 1300 to 2000 olives. Three of the four tree oils have the highest oil contents, but soybean, an annual oil seed crop with low oil content, still provides a large part of the vegetable oil production in the world. Corn, with the lowest oil content, is grown in large enough quantities to be the third most utilized vegetable oil in the United States. Canola, an
4
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
annual oil seed crop developed and grown for its oil composition, has moved from a virtual unknown to second in oilseed utilization to soybean oil. Canola seed has the second highest oil content and oil yield per acre of all the annual oilseed plants presented in Table 1.1; it is surpassed only by peanut or groundnut oil for oil content and yield. 1.4 AVAILABILITY OF FATS AND OILS An important contributor to the availability of fats and oils is the fact that most fats and oils production is controlled by factors other than the demand. Corn and cottonseed oils are clearly byproducts, whereas soybeans are specifically crushed to meet the demands for meal. Sunflower, canola, and peanut plantings are subsidized and controlled by the governments of the major countries producing the oils. Palm kernel oil production is dependent on palm oil requirements, as it is grown in the same fruit bunch. Olive, coconut, and palm oils are all produced from the fruit of trees that have long productive life spans, therefore, their production cannot be adjusted to demand changes from year to year. Animal fats are dependent on meat consumption, and butter output is subject to milk production. Thus, the availability of fats and oils is not geared to demand. Weather is another factor that affects both availability and demand for fats and oils. For example, a hurricane in Malaysia can decrease the oil available on the world market; alternatively, favorable weather in the United States, which produces a soybean crop with maximum yields, will increase the available oil for the world market. Other factors that affect world demand are the Russian sunflower crop, African peanut crop, South American soybeans and cottonseed oil yields, and so forth. This is a one-world market in which variable inputs affect availability and demand, which, in turn, affect the price structure. 1.5 United States UTILIZATION OF EDIBLE FATS AND OILS Climate and availability certainly influenced the eating habits of our ancestors. Inhabitants of central and northern Europe obtained their edible fats from animals, whereas people in southern Europe, Asia, and Africa acquired their edible oils from vegetable sources. The food products developed in these different regions used the available fats and oils products. Consequently, the cuisine of central and northern European countries developed around the use of solid fats, such as butter, lard, and tallow for breads, pastries, and other baked and fried products. Similarly, the diets of inhabitants from warmer climates were developed around the use of liquid oils for their food products, which include many sauces and dressings.4 These trends appear to continue to be the preference of their descendants. Immigrants to the United States brought their food preferences with them and introduced them to others from different regions of the world. Fats and oils technology has further increased the varied and rich American diet by improvement
Raw Materials
5
Table 1.2 2004/2005 World Vegetable Oil Consumption Rank
With U.S. Usage
Order
Oil
Million lbs
Without U.S. Usage Oil
Million lbs
Consumption, % U.S.
World*
1
Palm
72,292
Palm
71,039
4.7
33.1
2
Soybean
69,828
Soybean
51,873
67.8
24.2
3
Canola
34,474
Canola
32,569
7.2
15.2
4
Sunflower
18,678
Sunflower
18,319
1.4
8.5
5
Peanut
11,088
Peanut
10,817
1.0
5.1
6
Cottonseed
10,098
Cottonseed
9,238
3.3
4.3
7
Palm kernel
8,316
Palm kernel
7,787
2.0
3.6
8
Coconut
7,260
Coconut
6,134
4.3
2.9
9
Olive
6,270
Olive
5,756
1.9
2.7
10
Corna
2,483
Corn
798
6.4
0.4
214,330
100.0
100.0
Total
240,787
Notes: a U.S. production only; * without U.S. consumption.
of existing products and development of new food products. The North American eating habits that resulted have made the United States a consumer of almost every available fat and oil, but at a different rank order than for world production. Table 1.2 compares the United States and world vegetable oil consumption.3 Soybean oil does not enjoy the dominant position in the world market that it has in the U.S. market. Palm oil has becomes the major source of oil in the world, followed by soybean, rapeseed (canola), and sunflower oil. The American consumer is offered these fats and oils in the form of cooking or salad oils; butter, margarine, or spreads; and shortenings or as an ingredient in a prepared food product. The sources of the major fats and oils used in the United States are listed in Table 1.3, which reviews the annual usage of both animal fats and vegetable oils over the past five decades.3,5,6 These data indicate some distinct trends over the past 55 years:
1. Individual consumption continues to increase 2. A move away from animal fats to vegetable oils 3. Replacement of previously established fats and oils with different source oils 4. Introduction of new vegetable oils 5. The rise and fall of some individual source oils 6. Source oil changes that reflect the results of medical studies 7. Introduction of genetically modified oil seed varieties 8. And more
Disappearance of fats and oils in the United States has increased to over four times the levels recorded 55 years ago. This increased usage is due to increases in population, personal consumption, food waste, and changes in the food preparation methods. The per capita use of visible fats and oils increased by 39.7 pounds during this period,
6
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 1.3 U.S. Food Fats and Oils Disappearance and Per Capita Consumption Fats and Oils Year
Millions of pounds 1950
1960
1970
1980
577
1743
Coconut
129
172
788
1032
897
983
1126
Corn
223
310
445
673
1149
1630
1685
1445
1225
891
523
851
672
860
79
51
67
58
211
459
514
1
182
299
256
385
1253
Canola
Cottonseed Olive Palm Palm kernel
1990
2000
2005 1905
26
53
94
NR
362
256
529
103
62
193
112
197
244
271
1446
3011
6253
9112
12164
16318
17955
64
200
357
359
2050
1889
1645
1023
825
630
722
Tallow
156
328
518
995
955
1449
1464
Butter
1062
890
860
814
790
1013
1081
Total
6719.0
7992
12036
14705
19492
26261
29810
Peanut Safflower Soybean
100
Sunflower Lard
Consumption
58
122
87
Pounds per person
Vegetable oils
24.0
26.7
39.0
44.7
52.5
63.0
75.2
Animal fats
21.9
18.5
14.1
12.3
8.5
10.2
10.4
Total
45.9
45.3
53.1
57.0
61.0
73.2
85.6
confirming an increase in personal usage either from consumption or waste. The changes in the food fats utilized reflect the changing eating habits of Americans in relation to time, place, and frequency of eating. During the periods of high increases, the popularity of convenience and snack foods rose sharply, accompanied by rapid growth in the fast food industry, which relies heavily on deep-fat frying. Fats and oils consumption has been categorized into visible and invisible sources. Visible fats and oils are those isolated from animal tissues, oilseeds, or oil fruits and used for food preparation as shortening, margarine, or liquid oil or for specialty uses. Invisible fats and oils are consumed as part of meats, poultry, eggs, dairy products, fish, fruits, or vegetables and account for approximately 60% of an individual’s fat consumption. The values for pounds per person reported in Table 1.3 are those from visible sources only. A shift from animal fats to vegetable oils began long before 1950. Animal fats dominated the U.S. market until animal fat supply shortages and new process developments helped cottonseed oil gain popularity. In 1950, animal fats were only slightly behind in market share, but 20 years later, in 1970, edible vegetable oils accounted for three fourths of the total and animal fats for only one fourth. This trend has continued, with vegetable oil commanding almost 90% of the U.S. edible oil market in 2005. On a per capita basis, edible vegetable oil consumption increased
Raw Materials
7
during the second half of the twentieth century from 24 to 75.2 pounds; meanwhile, animal fats usage fell from 21.9 to 10.4 pounds. During this period, cottonseed oil lost its dominant vegetable oil position to soybean oil, due to cottonseed supply shortages and economics surrounding the shortage. Vegetable oils became dominant mainly because of competitive pricing (first for cottonseed oil and then for soybean oil), increased hydrogenation capacity, consumer preference shifts from butter to margarine, and nutritional concerns. Nutritional issues regarding cholesterol and saturated fats led to the demise of animal fats for food use and helped vegetable oils other than soybean and cottonseed obtain a share of the U.S. market. Canola, corn, olive, sunflower, and safflower oils have all been marketed as oils with more attractive nutritional values, such as lower levels of saturated fat and higher levels of polyunsaturated fat. Now, the 2005 data is beginning to indicate efforts to eliminate trans fatty acids in the diet. Increased usage of palm oil and butter probably indicate efforts by consumers and processors to avoid trans fatty acids. 1.6 CHARACTERIZATION OF FATS AND OILS The chemical and physical properties of fats and oils are largely determined by the fatty acids that they contain and their position within the triacylglycerol molecule. Chemically, all fats and oils are esters of glycerin and fatty acids; nevertheless, the physical properties of natural fats and oils vary widely because (1) the proportions of fatty acids vary over wide ranges, and (2) the triacylglycerol structures vary for each individual oil and fat. Fats and oils are commonly referred to as triglycerides because the glycerin molecule has three hydroxyl groups where a fatty acid can be attached. All triglycerides have the same glycerin unit, so it is the fatty acids that contribute the different properties. The fatty acid components are distinguished in three ways: (1) chain length, (2) number and position of the double bonds, and (3) position of the fatty acids within the glyceride molecule. Variations in these characteristics are responsible for the chemical and physical differences experienced with edible fats and oils. The structure of a fatty acid may be denoted by a systematic name after the nomenclature of its parent hydrocarbon, by the biochemist system, by its common name, or by a convenient shorthand designation showing the number of carbon atoms and the number of double bonds. The fatty-acid carbon-chain lengths vary between 4 and 24 carbon atoms with up to six double bonds. The most prevalent saturated fatty acids are lauric (C-12:0), myristic (C-14:0), palmitic (C-16:0), stearic (C-18:0), arachidic (C-20:0), behenic (C-22:0), and lignoceric (C-24:0). The most important monounsaturated fatty acids are oleic (C-18:1) and erucic (C-22:1). The essential polyunsaturated fatty acids are linoleic (C-18:2), linolenic (C-18:3), EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid) (C-20:5), and DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) (C-22:6). The triglyceride structure of an edible fat or oil is affected by the fatty acids that are present and the point of attachment of each fatty acid to the glycerin. Triglycerides with three identical fatty acids are called monoacid triglycerides. Triglycerides containing more than one type of fatty acid are called mixed triglycerides. A mixed
8
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
triglyceride containing three different fatty acids has three regioisomeric forms and six stereoisomeric forms, depending on which fatty acid is in the beta or middle position (sn-2) of the glycerol portion of the molecule and which fatty acids are in the alpha or outer positions (sn-1 and sn-3). The distribution of the fatty acids is considered to be nonrandom when the saturated fatty acids are positioned predominantly in the sn-1 or sn-3 positions and the unsaturated fatty acids are positioned predominantly in the sn-2 position.7 The fatty acid compositions of natural fats and oils vary significantly depending, not only on the plant or animal species, but also within the same species. Among the factors that affect the vegetable oil fatty acid compositions are climate conditions, soil type, growing season, plant maturity, plant health, microbiological conditions, seed location within the flower, and genetic variation of the plant. Animal fat and oil composition varies according to the animal species, diet, health, fat location on the carcass, and maturity.8 1.7 NONGLYCERIDE COMPONENTS OF FATS AND OILS The primary constituents in crude fats and oils are the triglycerides, but they also contain varying amounts of minor components, many of which significantly affect their chemical and physical properties. Exclusive of free fatty acids, crude vegetable oils commonly contain 2% or more nonglyceride substances, and animal fats contain much smaller quantities. These minor components, referred to as the unsaponifiable fraction, consist of phospholipids, tocopherols, sterols, resins, carbohydrates, pesticides, proteins, trace metals, and pigments, such as gossypol, carotene, and chlorophyll. Some, but not all, of the nonglyceride materials are undesirable, therefore, the objective in all edible oil processing is to remove the objectionable impurities with the least possible damage to the desirable constituents. 1.7.1 Phospholipids These compounds are better known to oil processors as phosphatides and are frequently referred to, together with small quantities of carbohydrates and resins, as gums, which have adverse effects on product quality and refined oil yield. Phosphatides are emulsifiers and hinder the separation of oil and water phases in the chemical refining process, interfere with effective bleaching, are catalyst poisons, shorten shelf life, and foul equipment surfaces. Phosphatides consist of polyhydric alcohols esterified with fatty acids and phosphoric acid, which is combined with a nitrogen-containing compound. The phosphatides are divided into two categories: hydratable and nonhydratable, depending on the effect that water has on them. The hydratable phosphatides (phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylinositol) can be separated from the oil phase with water. The nonhydratable phosphatides (phosphatidic acid and lysophosphatidic acid) and the calcium and magnesium salts of these acids remain in the oil after water degumming. A typical water degumming process will remove the hydratable phosphatides to a level of 200 ppm (parts per million)
Raw Materials
9
Table 1.4 Fats and Oils Nonglyceride Components Phosphatides %
Sterols ppm
Cholesterol ppm
Tocopherols ppm
Tocotrienols ppm
Soybean
2.2 ± 1.0
2965 ± 1125
28 ± 7
1293 ± 300
86 ± 86
Canola
2.0 ± 1.0
8050 ± 3230
53 ± 27
692 ± 85
—
1.25 ± 0.25
15050 ± 7100
57 ± 38
1477 ± 183
355 ± 355
0.8 ± 0.1
4560 ± 1870
68 ± 40
865 ± 35
30 ± 30 270 ± 270
Fat or Oil
Corn Cottonseed Sunflower
0.7 ± 0.2
3495 ± 1055
26 ± 18
738 ± 82
Safflower
0.5 ± 0.1
2373 ± 278
7±7
460 ± 230
15 ± 15
0.35 ± 0.05
1878 ± 978
54 ± 54
482 ± 345
256 ± 218
Peanut Olive
< 0.1
100
< 0.5
110 ± 40
89 ± 89
Palm
0.075 ± 0.025
2250 ± 250
16 ± 3
240 ± 60
560 ± 140
Tallow
< 0.07
1100 ± 300
1100 ± 300
—
—
Lard
< 0.05
1150 ± 50
3500 ± 500
—
—
Coconut
< 0.07
805 ± 335
15 ± 9
6±3
49 ± 22
Palm kernel
< 0.07
1100 ± 310
25 ± 15
3±3
30 ± 30
phosphorus for soybean and canola oils. Pretreatment of good-quality crude oils with phosphoric or citric acid before refining is successful in removing both nonhydratable and hydratable phosphatides to a phosphorus level of approximately 20 to 30 ppm. Two common phosphatides occurring in vegetable oils are the lecithins and cephalins, which may be considered triglycerides that have one fatty acid replaced with phosphoric acid. The gums separated with a water degumming process can be dried for lecithin processing; however, the gums isolated with acid degumming processes are not suitable for standard lecithin because their phosphatide composition differs and they contain the degumming acid. As indicated in Table 1.4, all the seed oils contain significant quantities of the phosphatides.9-11 1.7.2 Tocopherols and Tocotrienols Tocols, natural antioxidants found in plant-based oils, include four tocopherol and four tocotrienol isomers, each designated as alpha (α), beta (β), gamma (γ), and delta (δ) depending on the number and position of methyl groups on a chromane ring; they also possess vitamin E activity. The tocopherols have a saturated side chain, whereas the tocotrienols have an unsaturated side chain. These antioxidants inhibit lipid oxidation in foods by stabilizing hydroperoxy and other free radicals and their presence has a major effect on oil flavor quality. The antioxidant activity of tocopherols in foods is least for α-tocopherols, while the β- and γ-isomers have intermediate activities and the δ-isomer is the most active. Tocotrienols are less effective than their corresponding tocopherols.12 The stability of many vegetable oils has been credited to the presence of these natural antioxidants; however, too high a tocopherol level will enhance oxidation of the unsaturated fatty acids.13 Seed oils are the major sources of tocopherols and there seems to be a direct relationship between the degree
10
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
of unsaturation and the total tocopherol content, that is, higher tocopherol concentrations are present when the unsaturation level indicates a need to prevent oxidation. The tocotrienols are found predominantly in palm oil and cereal oils, such as barley and rice bran oil. Vitamin E functions in humans as a nonspecific chain-breaking antioxidant that prevents the propagation of lipid oxidation. With respect to their vitamin E activity, α-tocopherol is the most active compound present, while the activity of the other compounds is: β-tocopherol, 15–40; γ-tocopherol, 1–20; δ-tocopherol, 1; α-tocotrienol, 15–30; β-tocotrienol, 1–5; and γ- and δ-tocotrienol, 1% of that of the α-tocopherol. The natural occurring α-tocopherol has been found 35% more active than that of the synthetic all racemic α-tocopherol.12 Table 1.4 lists the tocopherol and tocotrienol contents of most of the major fats and oils before processing.11,13-15 The natural antioxidant content decreases during each stage of processing, with the highest reduction occurring during chemical refining and deodorization. Refining with caustic can remove as much as 10 to 20% of the tocopherols and tocotrienols, but 30 to 60% can be lost with deodorization or steam distillation. Distillates from deodorized or chemically refined oils have economic value due to the sterol and tocopherol contents that are sources for natural vitamin E, natural antioxidants, and other pharmaceuticals. The fat-soluble natural antioxidants are light yellow to colorless, but acquire a deep red hue with oxidation, which causes a noticeable intensification of the red–yellow color.8 1.7.3 Sequalene Squalene is an unsaturated hydrocarbon, C30H50, with important biological properties. Sequalene is a low-density compound that is lighter than water with a specific gravity of 0.855. It can easily produce oxygen by combining with water. It is a metabolic precursor of the entire steroid family. Oxidation of one of the terminal double bonds forms an oxide, which is enzyme catalyzed to lanosterol, and then elaborated into cholesterol and other steroids. A chemopreventive effect of squalene on some forms of cancer has been reported. Sequalene has also been shown to possess moderate antioxidant properties; however, it sustains a significant loss of these properties during storage. Shark liver oil is a rich source of squalene and small amounts are found in some vegetable oils. Olive oil and amaranth seed oil are two rich plant sources of squalene. It also is a natural byproduct of natural vitamin A commercial production.16-19 1.7.4 Sterols Sterols are minor components of all natural fats and oils and comprise most of the unsaponifiable matter, the remainder consists essentially of hydrocarbons. The sterols are high melting, colorless, and somewhat inert. It was thought that sterols did not contribute any property to a fat or oil; however, an antipolymerization activity has been identified for some sterols in heated oils, they can undergo oxidation to form a variety of oxidation products, and they can lower LDL (low-density
Raw Materials
11
lipoproteins) cholesterol levels in hypercholesterolemic individuals. Caustic refining removes a portion of the sterols, but more effective removal requires fractional crystallization, molecular distillation, or high-temperature steam distillation. Table 1.4 lists the total sterol levels and identifies the cholesterol portion for each of the major fats and oils.11 Cholesterol is the main sterol component of animal fat and fish oil and is found in vegetable oils in only trace amounts. In humans, the liver synthesizes cholesterol, but it is also consumed through the diet. Its presence in the body is essential for life. Being water soluble, cholesterol can only be transported in the body by combining with water-soluble proteins to form lipoproteins. It is the form of these lipoproteins that has been the subject of many investigations involving heart disease. There are several types of lipoproteins that have different densities. These are classified as high-density lipoproteins (HDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), and very lowdensity lipoproteins (VLDL). Elevated levels of LDL and VLDL cholesterol can be oxidized to ultimately form plaque that can build up on artery walls to restrict blood flow and cause elevated blood pressure. HDL cholesterol apparently carries cholesterol out of the bloodstream and back to the liver for breakdown and excretion. The levels of serum cholesterol and the LDL and HDL fractions in the blood are influenced by several factors including age, sex, genetics, diet, and physical activity. Diet and exercise are controllable factors for reducing coronary heart disease risk factors. The general diet guidelines that relate to fats and oils are:21 • Saturated fatty acids increase total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol. Palmitic, myristic and lauric fatty acids increase both LDL and HDL cholesterol, but stearic and the medium-chain fatty acids (6 to 10 carbon atoms) have neutral effects on blood lipids and lipoproteins. • Trans fatty acids have been shown to increase serum LDL cholesterol and some studies have indicated that trans fatty acids tend to lower serum HDL cholesterol. • Monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids lower serum cholesterol when they replace saturated and trans fatty acids.
Vegetable oil sterols are collectively called phytosterols. Campesterol, stigmasterol, and sitosterol are the best-known vegetable sterols. Vegetable sterols, primarily sitosterol as a fatty acyl ester, have been shown to reduce both serum cholesterol and LDL cholesterol and are promising additions to foods to lower heart disease risk.13 Phytosterols, and to a greater extent phytostanols, inhibit absorption of cholesterol in the intestine, while not being absorbed themselves in significant amounts.22 The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a health claim for plant sterol/stanols esters: Diets low in saturated fat and cholesterol that include at least 1.3 grams plant sterol esters or 3.4 grams of plant stanol esters, consumed in two meals a day with other foods may reduce the risk of heart disease. Additionally, the claim states that they can reduce cholesterol levels.23 Phytosterols were used as a supplement and as a drug to lower serum cholesterol levels in hypercholesterolemic individuals before the “statin” drugs were introduced. The crystalline nature and poor solubility of free phytosterols limited their use as a
12
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
supplement, drug, or in food applications. A major breakthrough occurred when scientist at Raisio Group in Finland discovered that phytostanols fatty acid ester derivatives could be readily incorporated into fatty foods, such as margarine and salad dressings. The phytosterols derived from vegetable oils or “tall oil’ are refined and purified, hydrogenated to phytostanols, and then esterified with fatty acids. Stanols derived from tall oil contain primarily sitostanol and campestanol in a ratio of ~92/8; stanols derived from soybean oil contain a sitostanol/campestanol ratio of ~68/32. Both blends appear to have equal efficacy. Clinical studies have shown that stanol esters lower LDL cholesterol levels up to ~14% in adults and children. Phytosterol esters have also been shown to lower serum LDL cholesterol levels in more than 14 efficacy studies. Sterol esters are made by esterifying vegetable oil derived phytosterols with fatty acids; no hydrogenation is required with the sterol esters.22 Commercial sterols are derived from vegetable oils indirectly — soapstock from alkali refining and deodorizer distillate are sources of sterols. Processors distill them from the vegetable oil processing byproducts and market the phytosterol ingredients as free sterols and sterol esters. A pine tree byproduct of the pulp-making process is another source of sterols. Natural sitostanol is rare in plants and the sitostanol used in commercial food applications is produced by catalytic hydrogenation of the two most common plant phytosterols: β-sitosterol and stigmasterol.22 The sterols and stanols are esterified with fatty acids from vegetable oils, converting them to fatsoluble stanol esters that do not alter the physical properties of food products. Stanol and sterol esters, esterified with long-chain fatty acids are hydrolyzed into free sterols during digestion in the body. The phytosterols ingredients have been approved for addition to fat-based products, such as spreads, dressings, and low-fat foods like yogurt, cheese, and breakfast cereals. Free sterols incorporate into low-fat foods easier than sterol esters.24 1.7.5 Pigments The color bodies in fats and oils include the carotenes that impart yellow and red colors to the oil, chlorophylls that give it a greenish cast, degraded proteins and carbohydrates that have a brownish cast, gossypol that provides the yellowish color to cottonseed oil, and some other components still not completely identified, such as the one giving a blue color that is observed occasionally in lard. Beta-carotene, one of several provitaminA compounds, is the main precursor of vitamin A. Its conversion to vitamin A occurs via cleavage of the molecule at the central double bond by the action of the enzyme carotene deoxygenase, which is present in human intestinal mucosa and the liver. The protective action of betacarotene and its oxygenated derivates, known as xanthaphylls, against deleterious effects of radiation on light sensitized cells has been well recognized. This effort has been attributed to the conjugated double bonds capable of quenching singlet oxygen; unfortunately, they also have the capability of forming radicals, which initiate oxidation degradation of oils.12 Carotene concentrations are low in most fats and oils except for palm oil, which contains 0.05 to 0.2%.8 The carotenes are heat sensitive and readily adsorbed by bleaching earths.
Raw Materials
13
Gossypol, found only in cottonseed oil at about 0.1 to 0.2%, is known to be toxic and affects the color of the oil. Past uses of gossypol as a biologically active agent have included its use as an anticancer agent, as a male birth control drug, and as an herbal medicine to combat bronchitis.25 Cottonseed oil must be chemically refined with caustic soda to remove this pigment. Soybean, canola, and olive oils, plus some tallow fats, have green colors due to chlorophyll or related compounds. The green color from chlorophyll is more prominent when the red and yellow colors are reduced by heat bleaching. Chlorophyll, the green coloring matter of plants, is known to decompose into pheophytins, pheophorbids, and pyropheophorbides, under acidic pH and in the presence of oxygen. The breakdown products are nearly 10 times stronger photosensitizers than the chlorophylls. Singlet oxygen formed during this transfer reacts 1500 times faster with unsaturated fatty acids than ground-state oxygen chlorophyll. Therefore, chlorophylls have a very significant impact on oxidative stability and must be removed from oils before they have an opportunity to breakdown and cause irreparable damage.26 1.7.6 Pesticides Pesticides are used to increase agriculture production throughout the world. Studies have shown that a majority of the pesticides applied eventually reach the soil surface, where they gradually spread, translocate to other environments, or eventually degrade. Translocation to oil-bearing plant seeds has also been demonstrated. Processing studies have shown that neither solvent extraction nor bleaching affects the pesticide levels in oils; however, it was found that pesticides are removed by volatilization during deodorization. The use of deodorizer distillates in animal feeds has been forbidden because of the pesticide content.20,27 1.7.7 Trace Metals Plants absorb trace amounts of metals during the growing season and during fats and oils processing. Most are harmful to product quality and human health and reduce the efficiency of the process. Trace quantities of copper, iron, manganese, and nickel substantially reduce the oxidative stability of fats and oils, whereas calcium, sodium, and magnesium reduce the efficiency of the refining, degumming, bleaching, and hydrogenation systems. The metals effects can be diminished by the use of chelating agents at various processing points to sequester the trace metals.28 The most widely used chelating agents are citric and phosphoric acids. 1.8 GENETICALLY MODIFIED VEGETABLE OILS Plant breeding to modify the genetics of crops has been practiced for centuries. Initially, genetic improvements were based on selection from genetic variation in wild and cultivated crops. More recently, plant breeders used crossing and selection techniques to enhance yields, oil contents, and climate adaptation, as well as
14
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
to affect changes in oil quality, composition, and resistance to pests or pesticides. Introduction of high-oleic safflower in 1964 and low-erucic acid rapeseed oil, which became known as canola oil in 1978, are examples of successful fatty acid composition modifications using this technology. Mutagenesis, another plant breeding technique where the seed is treated with a chemical or γ radiation to alter its physiological functions, was utilized by the Russians to develop high-oleic sunflower oil. These traditional tools used by plant breeders have been combined with biotechnology to broaden the breeders’ capabilities. The traditional crossing and selection techniques cause thousands of genes to be transferred at each cross, whereas molecular genetic engineering can now transfer or alter a single gene. Genetic engineering can also transfer a gene from one species to another, which is impossible with the traditional methods. The genetic modification of oilseeds by conventional breeding techniques combined with molecular genetic transformations provides a much broader array of possibilities to improve food products. One of the first modified oil compositions produced commercially with this process was high-laurate canola oil. High-laurate canola was engineered by inserting a single gene from the California bay laurel tree, which provides a substantial quantity of lauric fatty acid (C-12:0) in the oil.29 This genetic engineering feat proved that a gene from one plant could be transferred to another to produce an oil with specific fatty acid groups in selective positions for either performance or nutritional effects. Agronomically, high-laurate canola was a total success, but it failed in the market place. Two reasons were suggested for its failure: (1) potential customers for genetically modified products were reluctant to commit because of consumer opposition to genetically modified crops, and (2) the specialty oil was marketed at a premium price, which was twice that of most other oils.30 Genetic varieties have been developed to modify the fatty acid profile of oilseed to create new value-added oils. Regardless of the oilseed variety, most of these efforts have followed the same directions: (1) low saturates for dietary needs, (2) low linolenic for flavor stability, (3) high oleic for health and oxidative stability, and (4) high saturates to replace hydrogenation. Currently, only a few of the trait-enhanced oils have captured any market share. The major reason these improved oils have not found acceptance is the high cost of the oils. Some of the key factors that drive up the costs for these modified oils are • Lack of competitive field yields: Most modified oilseeds provide only about 85 to 95% of the yield potential of the regular oilseed variety. Farmers require a high premium to grow these lower yielding varieties. • Identity preservation systems: Separate handling systems are required at every stage, including seed handling, planting, growing, harvesting, transportation, storage, extraction, and final processing. • Low trait stability: Environmental effects have caused inconsistent oil compositions in modified oilseed products.
Efforts to reduce or eliminate trans fatty acids have caused several food companies to change to the trait-enhanced oils to avoid the use of partially hydrogenated
Raw Materials
15
oils. The increased demand is projected to accept the premium pricing and provide the identity preservation systems required.31 Nutrition presents a tremendous potential for genetically engineered oilseeds since it is an emerging arena. As medical science defines features and benefits desirable in oils for human and animal nutrition, plant geneticists can probably develop plants with the desirable characteristics. Development of oilseeds rich in omega-3 long-chain unsaturated fatty acids have already had some success. Australian researchers have accomplished conversion of α-linolenic to EPA fatty acid with a desaturase gene from the zebra fish and an elongase gene from the nematode. They also inserted both a desaturase and elongase gene from microalga Pavlova salina to synthesize DHA.32 Safflower seed oil containing 65% γ-linolenic omega-6 fatty acid has been developed with commercialization expected in 2008.33 Soybeans, developed with traits from other plants, have increased levels of stearidonic (C-18:4) omega-3 fatty acid, a short chain polyunsaturated fatty acid that acts like EPA (C-20:5) fatty acids in the human body.34 Linseed, a rich source of linolenic and linoleic fatty acids has proved to be a disappointment for genetic engineers. Transgenic plants produced intermediate longer chain fatty acids, but only small quantities of the long-chain EPA and arachidonic fatty acids. Apparently, the endogenous biochemistry of linseed limits production of the long-chain EPA fatty acid. 1.9 SOYBEAN OIL Soybean oil is obtained from soybeans, Glycina maxima, which are grown in several countries of the world. Soybeans are native to eastern Asia, where ancient Chinese literature indicates that soybeans have been an important part of their diet for centuries. Even though soybean oil currently fulfills over 60% of the U.S. edible fats and oils requirements, it is a relatively new food crop for the United States. Soybeans were grown in the United States as early as 1804, but remained an agricultural curiosity and minor crop for over a century.35 European successes with soybean utilization in soap and cattle feed influenced similar experimentation in the United States, which led to processing of imported soybeans in 1911 and domestic soybeans in 1915. The early ventures were hampered by difficulties in obtaining a suitable supply of soybeans, a lack of processing experience, and development of a market for the soybean oil and meal. Soybean oil, high in polyunsaturates, linoleic, and linolenic fatty acid, is classified as a semidrying oil. Initially, soybean oil was identified as an industrial oil, but as a paint oil it dried slowly and developed “after tack,” whereas as an edible oil it tasted like paint. Despite the flavor and odor deficiencies, World War II shortages drove soybean oil production to 0.3 billion pounds in 1938 and further to 1.3 billion pounds in 1945. Fats and oils processors were incorporating as much soybean oil into formulations as possible to take advantage of the 4 to 9¢ per pound discount over cottonseed oil. In many products, hydrogenated soybean oil blended into a formulation without a noticeable flavor degradation; however, flavor was still the limiting factor for acceptance of soybean as a food oil. The soybean oil flavor problem had to be solved before it would be accepted by the food industry.36
16
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
During World War II, German edible oil processors developed a formula or process to cure soybean oil reversion. The process included the addition of citric acid to the deodorized oil, which chelate trace prooxidant metals. Objective flavor and odor evaluations substantiated that trace metals were a significant contributor to the soybean oil flavor problem. Other edible fats and oils can tolerate copper and iron in the ppm range, but soybean oil flavor is ruined by as little as 0.5 ppm iron and 0.01 ppm copper. This information caused edible oil processors to immediately adopt metal deactivators, of which citric acid is still the most popular, and they promoted the removal of brass valves and conversion of cold rolled steel deodorizers to stainless steel for processing. Another effective precaution identified was nitrogen blanketing of all oils during the critical high temperature processing steps, including packaging. Effective preventive measures had been identified, but investigations still had not determined the cause of the off-flavor development with soybean oil. Circumstantial evidence pointed to the 7 to 8% linolenic fatty acid content. A classic experiment interesterified 9% linolenic fatty acid into cottonseed oil, which typically contains less than 1% of the C-18:3 fatty acid. Subsequent flavor panels identified this modified product as soybean oil. This result presented three alternatives for improving the flavor stability of soybean oil: (1) breed it out, (2) extract it out, or (3) hydrogenate it out. Hydrogenation to reduce the linolenic fatty acid content was chosen as the most practical short-term approach.37 Soybean salad oil with reduced linolenic fatty acid content (3 to 4%) was introduced to the U.S. market in the early 1960s. This product was lightly hydrogenated and subsequently winterized to remove the hard fractions developed during hydrogenation. This soybean salad oil was quickly accepted by the retail salad oil consumers and also industrially as a component of salad dressings, mayonnaise, margarines, and shortenings.38 In the 1970s, improvements in soybean seed handling, oil extraction, and oil processing produced a refined, bleached, and deodorized (RBD) oil that was more acceptable for industrial users and was eventually introduced to the retail market. The processing techniques that helped achieve this improved flavor and oxidative stability and others that followed were:
1. Inactivation of the lipoxygenases enzymes that oxidize the polyunsaturated fatty acids and the phospholipases enzymes that catalyze the conversion of phospholipids to a nonhydratable form during oil extraction.39 2. Degumming to remove phospholipids, both the hydratable and nonhydratable forms. 3. Bleaching to remove oxidation products40 and the chlorophyll pigment that has a role in photosynthesis.41 4. Milder processing temperatures. 5. Use of stainless steel transfer lines and tanks for storage and process vessels.42 6. Metal chelating.43 7. Nitrogen protection for the oil throughout processing.44
Soybean oil has become a popular vegetable oil for foodstuffs due to its nutritional qualities, abundance, economic value, and wide functionality. Usage in the United States has increased more than 12-fold over the past 55 years. Soybean oil has been the dominant oil source in the United States since it exceeded cottonseed
Raw Materials
17
oil usage in 1950 and lard in 1953; it provided more than 61% of all the oil used for liquid oils, shortenings, margarines, and specialty fats and oils in 2005. 1.9.1 Soybean Oil Composition and Physical Properties Soybean oil is a very versatile oil as far as processing and product formulation are concerned in that it (1) refines with a low loss; (2) is a natural winter or salad oil; (3) has heat-sensitive color pigments that deodorize to a red color much less than 1.0 Lovibond; (4) develops large, easily filtered crystals when partially hydrogenated or fractionated; (5) has a high iodine value that permits hydrogenation of basestocks for a wide variety of products; (6) has a tocopherol level of about 1300 ppm as crude and retains more than the 500 ppm level required for oxidative stability; and (7) contains both omega-6 and omega-3 essential fatty acids.45 The triglyceride structure of soybean oil is characterized by an almost total absence of saturated fatty acids in the sn-2 position, random distribution of oleic and linolenic fatty acids on all glycerol positions, and a high proportion of linoleic fatty acid in the sn-2 position.46 The typical characteristics and physical properties for soybean oil are as follows:8,11,14,47-50 Soybean Oil Composition and Physical Properties Characteristics
Typical
Range
Specific gravity, 25/25°C
0.9175
0.917 to 0.921
Refractive index, 25°C
1.4728
1.470 to 1.476
Iodine value
131
123 to 139
Saponification number
192
189 to 195
Unsaponifiable matter, %
0.6
0.6 to 1.6
Titer, °C
24
Melting point, °C
–22
–20 to –23
—
–16 to –10
Solidification point, °C
—
Cloud point, °C
–9
—
Cold test, hours
25
—
AOM stability, hours
12
12 to 15
Oxidative stability index, (110°C), hours
2
2.2 to 3.3
α-tocopherol
100
56 to 165
β-tocopherol
23
16 to 33
γ-tocopherol
842
593 to 983
δ-tocopherol
363
328 to 411
Tocopherol content, ppm
Fatty acid composition, % C-14:0 Myristic
0.1
<0.2
C-16:0 Palmitic
10.6
8.0 to 13.3
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
0.1
<0.2
C-17:0 Margaric
0.1
C-18:0 Stearic
4.0
— 2.4 to 5.4
18
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Soybean Oil Composition and Physical Properties (Continued) Characteristics
Typical
Range
C-18:1 Oleic
23.3
17.7 to 26.1
C-18:2 Linoleic
53.7
49.8 to 57.1
C-18:3 Linolenic
7.6
5.5 to 9.5
C-20:0 Arachidic
0.3
0.1 to 0.6
C-20:1 Gadoleic
—
<0.3
C-22:0 Behenic
0.3
0.3 to 0.7
C-22:1 Erucic
—
<0.3
C-24:0 Lignoceric
—
<0.4
Hydrogenated crystal habit
β
Triglyceride composition, % SSS Trisaturated
0.1
SUS Disaturated
5.6
SUS Disaturated
— 6.6 to 9.6
—
5.2 to 9.3
SUU Monosaturated
35.7
14.0 to 32.4
UUU Triunsaturated
58.4
55.2 to 80.3
Notes: S = saturated, U = unsaturated, AOM = active oxygen method.
Two soybean oil characteristics that may be considered both a functional deficiency and a nutritional positive are related to the linoleic and linolenic fatty acid contents. First, the high linoleic and linolenic contents are essential fatty acids that the human body lacks the enzymes required for their production. Functionally, the linoleic and linolenic fatty acid content require extensive bleaching to remove chlorophyll, metal chelating, and optional antioxidant additions to avoid the beany, painty, fishy, or grassy flavors that develop at low levels of oxidation. Second, soybean oil hydrogenated to almost complete saturation has a high level of stearic fatty acid and crystallizes in the beta crystal form. Functionally this can be both a negative and a positive. Soybean oil-based shortenings and other plasticized products must have about 10% of a low-iodine-value cottonseed, palm, or tallow hardstock added to induce a beta-prime crystal form. All soybean oil shortenings develop a grainy, nonuniform consistency somewhat similar to products made with regular lard. Liquid shortenings require a beta crystal form hardstock to produce a stable pourable product. Nutritionally, a high stearic fatty acid content may be a positive; studies have indicated that stearic fatty acid has a cholesterol-neutral effect. A dietary fatty acids study indicated that the effects of stearic fatty acid should be classified with polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fatty acids instead of the saturated fatty acids.51 1.9.2 Genetically Modified Soybean Oil Over the past 35 years, significant progress has been made in modifying soybean oil fatty acid composition through plant breeding techniques. This effort was
Raw Materials
19
Table 1.5 Genetically Modified Soybean Oil Saturated Fatty Acid Composition, %
Palmitic C-16:0
Stearic C-18:0
Unsaturated Oleic C-18:1
Linoleic C-18:2
Linolenic C-18:3
Iodine Value
Normal soybean
10.4
3.2
23.5
54.6
8.3
136.5
Low-linolenic
12.2
3.6
24.2
57.2
3.8
130.1
High-oleica
6.4
3.3
85.6
1.6
2.2
82.1
Low-saturatea
3.0
1.0
31.0
9.0
148.9
57
Low-palmitic
5.9
3.7
40.4
43.4
6.6
127.2
High-palmitic
26.3
4.5
15.0
44.4
9.8
115.4
High-stearic
8.6
28.7
16.2
41.6
4.9
98.8
Note: Obtained through genetic engineering. a
pioneered by researchers from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Research Service at several land-grant universities and was later joined by scientists from private enterprise. Although a majority of the effort has been directed toward mutation breeding, genetic engineering has also been in use for the past 15 years. The genetic approach for oil modification is capable of increasing or decreasing a particular fatty acid in an oil for a specific attribute or application. Many different soybean varieties have been created, but four major directions for modification have evolved: decrease linolenic fatty acid, increase oleic fatty acid, decrease palmitic fatty acid, and increase saturated fatty acids. Each of these soybean oil modifications must be considered as a specialty oil with its own properties and applications. The six altered soybean oil fatty acid compositions compared with normal soybean oil in Table 1.5 exhibit the technical achievements in this area with conventional plant breeding. The hurdles for commercialization of these products are those discussed in section 1.8: poor field yields, low trait stability, and identity preservation problems that escalate the cost of the genetically modified oils (GMO).52,53 1.10 cottonseed Oil Cottonseed is a by-product of cotton production and, as such, its availability is dependent on the supply and demand for the cotton fiber surrounding the oilseed. Cotton is one of the oldest cultivated crops — India had cotton fields 4000 years ago and, when Columbus landed in America, he found cotton already growing there. However, the use of cottonseed oil did not emerge until the nineteenth century when European businessmen began to extract oil from a variety of seeds and nuts to find a more affordable fat source. Several attempts were made to introduce cottonseed oil to the U.S. market, but the first partially successful venture was as an adulterant for olive oil sold misbranded to immigrants. Its second opportunity was also as a dilutant for another product when it was secretly added to lard. This venture led to lard substitutes, which became vegetable oil shortenings for bakery products. The
20
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
development of caustic refining, bleaching, hydrogenation, and deodorization processes was instrumental in elevating the functionality of cottonseed oil shortenings over lard products. Process chemists developed a clear, odorless, bland-flavored cottonseed oil that set the standard for edible fats and oils globally. The scientific and technical advances developed to process cottonseed oil became the cornerstones of the edible fats and oils industry as it is known today. Cottonseed oil remained the principal raw material for liquid oils, margarines, and shortenings in the United States until the mid-twentieth century. This predominance began to erode after World War I and, soon after World War II, soybean oil became the principal source of vegetable oil.54 Cottonseed oil lost its dominant position due to cottonseed shortages and an increased demand for edible oil. Nevertheless, because of its desirable flavor, stability, and structure, cottonseed oil continues to be in demand by food processors worldwide. 1.10.1 Cottonseed Oil Composition and Physical Properties Crude cottonseed oil is derived mainly from the seeds of Gossypium hirsutum L. (American) or G. barbadense (Egyptian) varieties of cotton. The crude oil is unusual because it contains many kinds of nonglyceride materials that contribute to the strong, characteristic flavor and dark, reddish-brown color. More than 2% of crude cottonseed oil is made up of gossypol, phospholipids, tocopherols, sterols, resins, carbohydrates, and related pigments. Cottonseed oil has a relatively complex system of gossypol-type pigments (0.1 to 0.2% of crude cottonseed oil). The gossypol pigments have strong antioxidant properties and are essentially nonvolatile. Gossypol cannot be removed by steam distillation, so chemical refining is required to remove this pigment, which makes nonruminant animals sick. The light yellow color, characteristic of cottonseed oil, is primarily due to the presence of gossypol. Cottonseed oil is a member of a particularly useful group of vegetable oils, whose fatty acids consist substantially of C-16 and C-18 fatty acids containing no more than two double bonds. Its fatty acid profile is typical of the oleic/linoleic group of vegetable oils, as these two fatty acids make up almost 75% of the total. Palmitic, the major saturated fatty acid in cottonseed oil, has been identified as a β′ promoter when it is in the sn-1 or sn-3 positions, therefore, it is stable in the β′ crystal form, which is desirable in many products because this stability promotes a smooth, workable consistency, usually referred to as plasticity. The reverted flavor of deodorized cottonseed oil is usually described as nutty or nut-like, which is more acceptable at higher degrees of oxidation than other vegetable oils. Its characteristics make it a highly desirable food oil for use in salad and cooking oils, shortenings, margarines, and specialty fats and oils products. The characteristics of a particular cottonseed oil lot are dependent on the variety of cotton, geographic regions, soil conditions, climate, fertilizers, seed handling, and storage conditions after harvesting. Generally, high temperatures during seed development influence saturated fatty acid development (free fatty acids and red colors are higher with cotton grown in warm and humid conditions), and seed handling abuse can cause dark colors with high free fatty acids.8
Raw Materials
21
The typical characteristics of cottonseed oil are as follows:8,15,46-50 Cottonseed Oil Composition and Physical Properties Characteristics
Typical
Range
Specific gravity, 25/25°C
—
0.916 to 0.918
Refractive index, 25°C
—
1.468 to 1.472
Iodine value Saponification number Unsaponifiable matter, %
108
98 to 118
—
189 to 198
—
<1.5
Titer, °C
34.9
30 to 37
Melting point, °C
13.0
10 to 16
—
12 to –13
Cloud point, °C
3.0
–1.0 to 3.0
Cold test, hours
none
none
Solidification point, °C
AOM stability, hours
16
16 to 19
Oxidative stability index (110°C), hours
3.6
3.6 to 4.7
Tocopherol content, ppm α-tocopherol
355
340 to 369
γ-tocopherol
502
481 to 522
δ-tocopherol
8
8 to 9
Fatty acid composition, % C-14:0 Myristic
0.7
0.6 to 1.0
C-16:0 Palmitic
21.6
21.4 to 26.4
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
0.6
0 to 1.2
C-18:0 Stearic
2.6
2.1 to 3.3
C-18:1 Oleic
18.6
14.7 to 21.7 46.7 to 58.2
C-18:2 Linoleic
54.4
C-18:3 Linolenic
0.7
0 to 1.0
C-20:0 Arachidic
0.3
0.2 to 0.5
C-20:1 Gadoleic
—
0 to 0.1
C-22:0 Behenic
0.2
0 to 0.6
C-22:1 Erucic
—
0 to 0.3
C-24:0 Lignoceric
—
0 to 0.1
Triglyceride composition, % SSS Trisaturated
2.0
—
SUS Disaturated
13.9
—
SSU Disaturated
0.3
—
SUU Monounsaturated
45.8
—
UUU Triunsaturated
40.4
—
β′
—
Hydrogenated crystal habit
Notes: S = saturated, U = unsaturated, AOM = active oxygen method.
22
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Cottonseed oil contains up to 0.5% of a pair of unique fatty acids: malvalic (C18:1) and sterculic (C-19:1). These acids are characterized by the presence of a cyclopropene group at or near the center of the fatty acid chain. Color reactions of these fatty acids with reagents have provided a means of differentiating cottonseed oil from other edible oils. The cyclopropenoid fatty acids cause the development of the cherry-red color in the Halphen test (reaction with sulfur in carbon disulfide in the presence of amyl alcohol). This test for cottonseed oil was developed over a century ago, in 1897. Inclusion of cyclopropenoid acids in animal diets causes undesirable physiological effects, such as reduced egg production, poor hatching, and pink egg whites in chickens, as well as decreased growth and sexual development and carcinogenic properties in rats. In snack food frying, oxidized cyclopropenoid fatty acids have been blamed for a “light-struck” off-flavor in potato chips. Conventional processing, specifically hydrogenation and deodorization, largely inactivates these acids, for example, their level is reduced from 0.53 to 0.04% by deodorization.55,56 The distribution of the fatty acids in cottonseed oil is considered to be nonrandom, with the saturated fatty acids positioned predominantly in the sn-1 or sn-3 positions and the unsaturated fatty acids in the sn-2 position. Because linoleic, oleic, and palmitic fatty acids account for over 90% of the fatty acid composition of cottonseed oil, most of the triglycerides contain some combination of these fatty acids. Analysis of cottonseed oil by semiquantitative thin-layer chromatography indicated that the distribution of saturated (S) and unsaturated (U) fatty acids in the sn-1, 2, and 3 acyl positions were 11.8% SUS, 4.4% SSU, 12.3% USU, and 42% UUS. Almost 30% of the triglycerides contain only unsaturated fatty acids, but no molecules are completely saturated.55 1.10.2 Genetically Modified Cottonseed Oil Varieties of cotton with a gene to protect against tobacco budworms, cotton bollworms, and pink bollworms (known as Bt) as well as herbicide-tolerant traits have been made available to U.S. farmers. Herbicide- and insect-resistant cotton varieties have the potential to significantly reduce the volume of herbicides and insecticides required to reduce production costs while increasing cotton yields. These GM traits in the cotton plant have not affected the cottonseed oil composition. Genetic research to eliminate gossypol continues, and modified cottonseed oils have been produced with a wide range of fatty acid profile options. Researchers at the University of North Texas (Denton) have developed several lines with linoleic fatty acid reduced from 52 to 30% and oleic increased from 18 to 47%.57,58 Australian researchers have modified the cotton plant to produce cottonseed oil with an oleic content as high as 77% and expect it to replace hydrogenated oils used in foodservice applications. In a related development, the proportions of palmitic and stearic fatty acids have been altered to create a high-stearic cottonseed oil useful for margarine and shortening production.59 1.11 peanut Oil The peanut plant is known to have been cultivated as early as 2000 to 3000 B.C. and is a legume native to South America. It is thought that peanuts were carried
Raw Materials
23
to Africa from Brazil or Peru by explorers or missionaries. Slave traders brought peanuts to North America as shipboard food because peanuts were inexpensive, had high food value, and did not spoil readily. In North America, peanuts were not planted extensively until shortly after the Civil War, beginning in 1865, and then the crop was confined to two southern states: Virginia and North Carolina. The greatest factors contributing to expansion of U.S. peanut production was the invention of equipment for planting, cultivating, harvesting, separating the nuts from the plants, shelling, cleaning the kernels, roasting, blanching, salting, peanut butter production, and packaging. About half of the world’s peanut crop is crushed for oil; however, peanuts in the United States are subject to mandatory price supports and are grown mainly for food delicacies, whereas other countries grow them for oil and meal. Due to competition from other vegetable oils and the demand for edible nuts, only 10 to 15% of the U.S. crop is crushed for oil. In general, oilstock peanuts are those that are rejected or diverted from the edible nut channels. Rejection may be due to oversupply, being a variety different from that in demand, grading resulting in lowered quality, or inadequate storage resulting in nuts that are rancid, moldy, weathered, or insect infested.55 It is fortunate that aflatoxin contamination, which can be prevalent and serious with peanuts, can be controlled with respect to the quality of peanut oil with normal processing. Moldy peanuts that had been infected to the extent of 5500 ppb (parts per billion) with aflatoxins yielded a peanut oil with 812 ppb, which was reduced to 10 to 14 ppb after caustic refining and less than 1 ppb after bleaching.8 1.11.1 Peanut Oil Composition and Physical Properties Arachis hypogaea L., commonly known as peanut or groundnut because the seed develops underground, belongs to the same legume family as the soybean, Papilionaceous flowers, but in composition it is more like a nut than a bean or a pea. Peanuts are rich in oil, naturally containing from 47 to 50% of a nondrying oil. The oil has a pale yellow color, contributed by beta-carotene and lutelin. The pleasant nut-like flavor associated with peanuts goes with the oil on separation rather than the meal. The flavor is accentuated by oxidation and does not become offensive as quickly as some other vegetable oils. Compared with other seed oils, particularly cottonseed oil, it is relatively free of phosphatides and nonoil constituents. Several epidemiological studies have linked peanuts to a lower risk of heart disease. Recent research has shown that peanuts contain resveratrol, a phytochemical also found in red wine that has been linked to a lower risk of heart disease.61 The principal fatty acid in peanut oil is oleic, a monounsaturate associated with good oxidative and frying stability that has been found to lower serum LDL cholesterol concentrations.62,63 Peanut oil contains higher levels of oleic fatty acid than do corn and soybean oils, but lower levels than olive oil. Peanut oils cannot be winterized to meet the criteria of a salad oil because of the noncrystallinity of its higher melting point fraction; it solidifies at 0 to 3°C.64 The typical characteristics of peanut oil are as follows: 8,15,47,60,65-66
24
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Peanut Oil Composition and Physical Properties Characteristics
Typical
Range
Specific gravity, 25/25°C
—
0.910 to 0.915
Refractive index, 25°C
—
1.467 to 1.470
Iodine value
95
84 to 100
Saponification number
189
188 to 195
Unsaponifiable matter, %
0.4
0.2 to 1.0
Titer, °C
30
26 to 32
Melting point, °C
–2
Solidification point, °C
—
Cloud point, °C
4.4
Cold test, hours
none
— 0 to 3 — none
AOM stability, hours
25
—
Oxidative stability index (110°C), hours
6.5
—
Tocopherol content, ppm α-tocopherol
211
49 to 373
β-tocopherol
20
0 to 41
γ-tocopherol
239
88 to 390
δ-tocopherol
11
0 to 22
Fatty acid composition, % C-14:0 Myristic
0.1
<0.1
C-16:0 Palmitic
11.1
8.3 to 14.0
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
0.2
<0.2
C-18:0 Stearic
2.4
1.9 to 4.4
C-18:1 Oleic
46.7
36.4 to 67.1
C-18:2 Linoleic
32.0
14.0 to 43.0
C-18:3 Linolenic
—
<0.1
C-20:0 Arachidic
1.3
1.1 to 1.7
C-20:1 Gadoleic
1.6
0.7 to 1.7
C-22:0 Behenic
2.9
2.1 to 4.4
C-22:1 Erucic
—
<0.3
C-24:0 Lignoceric
1.5
1.1 to 2.2
C-24:1 Nervonic
—
<0.3
Triglyceride composition, % SSU Disaturated
3.6
—
SUU Monosaturated
35
—
UUU Triunsaturated
59
—
Hydrogenated crystal habit
β
—
Notes: S = saturated, U = unsaturated, AOM = active oxygen method.
Raw Materials
25
The triglyceride content of peanut oil is generally in the range of 96%, with oleic, linoleic, and palmitic as the main fatty acids. Peanut oil is composed of mixed glycerides of approximately 80% unsaturated and 20% saturated fatty acids. The fatty acid composition of peanut oil is responsible for its stability in deep-fat frying and its shelf life stability. The unsaturated fatty acids are oleic (C-18:1) and linoleic (C-18:3), with lesser amounts of gadoleic (C-20:1) and nervonic (C-24:1), and only a trace of linolenic (C-18:3). This composition contributes an excellent oxidative stability for a liquid oil. Peanut oil has a combined total of about 7% of C-20, C-22, and C-24; these long-chain fatty acids are characteristic components for identification. Peanut oil has a nonrandom distribution of fatty acids among the three positions of the triacylglycerols — palmitic and stearic are found predominantly in the sn-1 and sn-3 positions, the long-chain (C-20 to C-24) fatty acids are located almost exclusively in the sn-3 position, and the sn-2 position is high in unsaturated fatty acids.67 1.11.2 Genetically Modified Peanut Oil Peanut breeding programs are continually developing new and improved varieties with higher yields and grades, disease and insect resistance, virus and nematode resistance, drought and aflatoxin resistance, improved shelling characteristics, better processing qualities, longer shelf life, and enhanced flavor and nutrition. Using classic breeding techniques, commercial peanut varieties have been developed that incorporate a high-oleic fatty acid trait. The developed lines do not have meaningful differences from normal peanut varieties in oil content, flavor, color, or texture. The high-oleic varieties have produced an oil with a fatty acid composition somewhat similar to olive oil; oleic increased to 80% (±2%), linoleic was reduced to 2 to 3%, and palmitic decreased to 9% (±1%). Oxidative stability results have been recorded as much as 14.5 times better for high-oleic peanut oil, depending on the method of measurement. In recent research studies with human subjects, it was found that higholeic peanut oil produced significant positive changes in blood lipids, including a reduction in LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but did not affect the beneficial high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. These findings align with numerous studies that have shown that diets high in mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids and low in saturated fatty acids can be heart healthy.61,67 1.12 CORN OIL Corn, Zea mays L., a plant belonging to the grass family, is native to both North and South America. It was the staple grain of the Indians for centuries before Europeans reached the New World. Corn, one of the principal crops of the United States, is grown for its starch and protein content. Oil represents only a small fraction, 3.1 to 5.7%, of the weight of the corn kernel and is contained primarily in the corn germ. The availability of corn germ for oil recovery depends on the amount of corn processed by the corn milling industries: either the starch, sweetener, and alcohol industries or the corn meal industry, which produces corn meal, hominy
26
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
grits, corn flakes, etc. The germ, which contains about 50% oil, is obtained with a wet degermination process from the starch, sweetener, and alcohol processors. In the corn milling industry, the germ is obtained with a dry degermination process and contains only 10 to 24% oil.70 1.12.1 Corn Oil Composition and Physical Properties Corn oil belongs to the group of oils with high levels of linoleic and oleic fatty acids. The liquid oils in this group are the most adaptable of all the fats and oils. They have desirable oxidative stability properties and may be hydrogenated to a varying degrees of saturation from a milky liquid to melting points in excess of 138°F (59°C). Crude corn oil has a darker reddish amber color than do other vegetable oils, which can usually be processed to a light-colored oil. Some wet-milled oils are more difficult to bleach to a light color, possibly due to the conditions used to flake the germ before extraction. In other cases, corn oil has been deliberately underbleached and deodorized to retain a darker color for consumer appeal. The fatty acid composition of corn oil, like most other oils, will vary depending on the seed type, climatic conditions, and growing season. Corn oil from the United States Corn Belt is the highest in polyunsaturated fatty acids because of the climate and growing conditions. Corn oil produced in other countries is generally lower in linoleic fatty acid content and higher in oleic fatty acid.68 The typical characteristics for corn oil are as follows:8,14,49,69,70 Corn Oil Composition and Physical Properties Characteristics
Typical
Range
Specific gravity, 25/25°C
0.91875
0.915 to 0.920
—
1.470 to 1.474
124
118 to 128
Refractive index, 25°C Iodine value Saponification number
—
187 to 193
Unsaponifiable matter, %
—
1.3 to 2.3
Titer, °C
—
14 to 20
Melting point, °C
—
–12 to –10
Solidification point, °C
—
–1 to –20
Cloud point, °C
–9.5
—
Cold test, hours
20 dewaxed
—
Wax, %
—
AOM stability, hours
19
0.15 to 0.5 16 to 19
Oxidative stability index (110°C), hours
4.7
3.6 to 4.7 116 to 172
Tocopherol content, ppm α-tocopherol
152
β-tocopherol
12
0 to 22
γ-tocopherol
1276
1119 to 1401
δ-tocopherol
61
59 to 65
Raw Materials
27
Corn Oil Composition and Physical Properties (Continued) Characteristics
Typical
Range
Fatty acid composition, % C-14:0 Myristic
0.1
<0.1
C-16:0 Palmitic
10.9
8.0 to 19.0
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
0.2
<0.5
C-18:0 Stearic
2.0
0.5 to 4.0
C-18:1 Oleic
25.4
19.0 to 50.0
C-18:2 Linoleic
59.6
34.0 to 62.0
C-18:3 Linolenic
1.2
0.1 to 2.0
C-20:0 Arachidic
0.4
<1.0
C-20:1 Gadoleic
—
<0.5
C-22:0 Behenic
0.1
<0.5
0.3
—
Triglyceride composition, % SSS Trisaturated SUS Disaturated
3.4
—
SSU Disaturated
0.3
—
SUU Monosaturated
33.3
—
UUU Triunsaturated
63.0
—
Hydrogenated crystal habit
β
Notes: S = saturated, U = unsaturated, AOM = active oxygen method.
Corn oil contains traces of waxes (0.05%) that are esters of myricil and ceryl alcohols with tetracosanoic acid. The melting point of these waxes is 81 to 82°C (178 to 180°F). The waxes cause the oil to cloud when cooled to a low temperature unless removed by a dewaxing process. Dewaxed oil is important for retail salad oil production, but is not required for corn oil hydrogenated for margarine or shortening production. Corn oil is an excellent source of essential fatty acids; it typically exceeds 60%, contributed predominantly by linoleic (C-18:2) and usually less than 1.5% linolenic (C-18:3) fatty acids. In spite of this high level of unsaturation, corn oil has good oxidative flavor stability, partly attributed to its nonrandom distribution of fatty acids on triglycerides. It has been determined that 98% of the fatty acids esterified in the sn-2 position of corn oil triglycerides are unsaturated, leaving the outer sn-1 and sn-3 positions for saturates and the remaining unsaturates. Because the outer positions of the triglycerides are more reactive, the polyunsaturated fatty acids in the sn-2 position have some protection from oxidation. This theory was validated somewhat when it was determined that interesterified corn oil with randomized fatty acids oxidized three to four times faster than natural corn oil.70 The relatively high tocopherol content (about 0.1%), along with the presence of a small amount of another antioxidant (ferulic acid) component, also contributes to the excellent oxidative stability of corn oil. Typically, deodorized corn oil contains
28
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
0.08 to 0.12% total tocopherols, of which 70 to 80% is γ-tocopherol, 20 to 25% is α- tocopherol, and 3 to 5% is δ-tocopherol. Another contributor to an extended shelf life is that the flavor of corn oil, both as crude and when reverted, is rather pleasant, usually characterized as popcorn-like or musty.46,71 1.12.2 Genetically Modified Corn Oil In 2002, approximately, 35% of the corn acreage in the United States was pestresistant or herbicide-tolerant, genetically modified hybrids. Varieties with the oil content increased to 6.5 to 11% have also been developed to improve the energy density for livestock feeding. Both the wet and dry corn mill operators have resisted the high-oil corn because it has a larger germ in the kernel, which reduces the starch content and the efficiency of their equipment. None of these modifications has affected the corn oil composition. The industry is interested in genetic manipulation to produce different fatty acid compositions from the standpoint of improved functionality or improved nutritional properties. A high-oil, high-oleic variety has been developed that essentially reverses the oleic and linoleic fatty acid contents: 65% for oleic and 22% for linoleic. The primary attribute affected by increasing oleic fatty-acid content would be oxidative stability, which is especially important for frying and spray oil applications. However, it has been found that some high-oleic oils do not produce an acceptable fried food flavor. Frying evaluations have indicated that high-oleic corn oil had a high enough linoleic fatty acid content to produce an acceptable flavor.72 1.13 SUNFLOWER OIL Native Americans may have domesticated the sunflower plant before corn. Archaeologists and historians have discovered evidence that sunflower seeds were used as medication for cuts, bruises, and snake bites; they were ground into flour for cakes, bread, and mush; and pigments were extracted to dye baskets and other utensils. Spanish explorers introduced sunflowers to Europe in the sixteenth century. In Europe, the sunflower was mainly an ornamental curiosity until Peter the Great introduced it to Russia. Commercial extraction of sunflower oil for food use appears to have begun in Russia about 1830. Scientists in the former Soviet Union improved the oil content from about 29 to 46%, increased seed size and yield, shortened maturity times, and improved disease resistance.64,73 Sunflower is the fourth largest source of vegetable oil in the world, with the majority of the production being in the former Soviet Union countries. For North America, sunflower has gone full circle; it has returned, but Western Europe has remained the dominant market. In the U.S. market, sunflower oil has been treated as a premium product. Even though sunflower is the fourth largest vegetable oil produced in the United States, it ranks only eighth in usage. Sunflower oil competes with soybean and corn oils because their fatty acid profiles are similar. Soybean oil is generally the least expensive, and corn oil, which
Raw Materials
29
is usually more competitively priced, has been heavily promoted as a healthy oil. The export market provided a lucrative market for the North American sunflower seed crop until this market eroded due to competition from Argentina and the former Soviet Union. 1.13.1 Sunflower Oil Composition and Physical Properties Sunflower oil is obtained from the seed of the plant, Helianthus annuus L. Crude sunflower oil is light amber in color; the refined oil is a pale yellow and is similar to other oils. Sunflower oil has a distinctive, but not altogether unpleasant flavor and odor, which is easily removed by deodorization. The crude oil contains some phosphatides and mucilaginous matter, but less of it than cottonseed or corn oils. Traditionally, sunflower oil has been chemically refined, but it has been reported that physical refining has been successfully practiced. The advantages of physical refining are lower costs with less environmental impact. Sunflower oil has been valued as a component for spreads in Europe because of its high linoleic fatty acid and absence of linolenic fatty acids.69 The typical characteristics of sunflower oil are as follows:8,14,69,75 Sunflower Oil Composition and Physical Properties Characteristics
Typical
Range
Specific gravity, 25/25°C
—
0.918 to 0.923
Refractive index, 25°C
—
1.461 to 1.468
Iodine value
133
125 to 136
Saponification number
—
125 to 136
Unsaponifiable matter, %
—
<1.5
Titer, °C
—
16 to 20
—
-18 to -20
Melting point, °C Solidification point, °C
–17
—
Cloud point, °C
–9.5
—
Cold test, hours
24 dewaxed
Wax, %
—
— 0.02 to 0.35
AOM stability, hours
11
10 to 12
Oxidative stability index (110°C), hours
1.9
1.5 to 2.2
α-tocopherol
690
690 to 778
β-tocopherol
26
21 to 33
γ-tocopherol
5
5 to 9
Tocopherol content, ppm
Fatty acid composition, % C-14:0 Myristic
0.1
<0.2
C-16:0 Palmitic
7.0
5.6 to 7.6
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
0.1
<0.3
C-18:0 Stearic
4.5
2.7 to 6.5
C-18:1 Oleic
18.7
14.0 to 39.4
30
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Sunflower Oil Composition and Physical Properties (Continued) Characteristics
Typical
Range 48.3 to 74.0
C-18:2 Linoleic
67.5
C-18:3 Linolenic
0.8
<0.2
C-20:0 Arachidic
0.4
0.2 to 0.4
C-20:1 Gadoleic
0.1
<0.2
C-22:0 Behenic
0.7
0.5 to 1.3
C--22:1 Erucic
—
<0.2
C-24:0 Lignoceric
—
0.2 to 0.3
Triglyceride composition, % SSS Trisaturated
0.3
—
SUS Disaturated
2.9
—
SSU Disaturated
0.2
—
SUU Monosaturated
26.6
—
UUU Triunsaturated
70.2
—
Hydrogenated crystal habit
β
Notes: S = saturated, U = unsaturated, AOM = active oxygen method.
Few vegetable oils reflect the influence of climate, temperature, genetic factors, and position of seed location in the flower head so significantly in their composition as does sunflower oil. Generally, sunflower grown above the 39th parallel in the United States will be high in linoleic fatty acid and that grown below the 39th parallel will be high in oleic fatty acid. These differences also vary with temperature. A hot summer will lower the linoleic content of northern sunflower oils,76 therefore, fatty acid compositions will vary from year to year and region to region. Sunflower oil could be classified as a natural winter oil if it did not contain waxes. These compounds are responsible for the turbidity that develops when oils are held at temperatures below 70°F (21.1°C). The waxes are present in the sunflower seed hulls and are extracted with the oil, generally at levels of 0.02 to 0.35%, but sometimes higher. Sunflower waxes are based on C-20 to C-22 fatty acids and C-24 to C-28 alcohols and melt at 70 to 80°C (158 to 176°F).74 The waxes do not affect the emulsion stability of mayonnaise, as experienced with the hard fraction in cottonseed oil and hydrogenated oils; however, retail oils bottled in clear containers will cloud at shelf temperatures and present an unsightly appearance. Removal of these waxes with a dewaxing process prevents this cosmetic problem. 1.14 NuSun SUNFLOWER OIL A proposal was made and accepted at the National Sunflower Association meeting in 1995 to develop a mid-oleic sunflower for commercial production. It was suggested that a sunflower oil with 60 to 75% oleic (C-18:1) fatty acid, in contrast to the approximately 20% in regular sunflower oil, would provide a superior frying oil for
Raw Materials
31
industrial snack and restaurant frying applications. In addition, this oil would be trans acid free, as it would require only refining, bleaching, and deodorization processing. It was intended that this new sunflower oil (NuSun) would be a replacement for the current sunflower oil and marketed as a commodity rather than a specialty oil. It was thought that the long-term success of sunflower in the United States depended on competitive pricing with other vegetable oils. The USDA Agricultural Research Service Sunflower Research Center at Fargo, North Dakota, provided breeding lines to private seed companies, which brought the new hybrid to the market quickly. The first planting of this oilseed was in 1996, and about 65% the U.S. oil-type sunflower acres were planted this new hybrid in 2004.77,78 1.14.1 NuSun Composition and Physical Properties NuSun is a nontransgenic sunflower variety. The oil from this seed is referred to as mid-oleic because it contains a higher level than traditional sunflower oil (20%), but a lower level than the high-oleic variety (80%). It has a lower saturated fatty-acid content than does traditional sunflower oil and a level equivalent to high-oleic sunflower oil. The typical characteristics for NuSun sunflower oil are as follows:47,50,69,79 NuSun Oil Composition and Physical Properties Characteristics Specific gravity, 25/25°C Refractive index, 25°C Iodine value Saponification number Unsaponifiable matter, % Cold test, hours Wax, % AOM stability, hours Oxidative stability index (110°C), hours Fatty acid composition, % C-14:0 Myristic C-16:0 Palmitic C-18:0 Stearic C-18:1 Oleic C-18:2 Linoleic C-18:3 Linolenic Triglyceride composition, % SSS Trisaturated SUS Disaturated SUU Monosaturated UUU Triunsaturated Hydrogenated crystal habit
Typical
Range
— — 105 — — 12 dewaxed — 30 8.5
0.915 to 0.926 1.463 to 1.467 84 to 128 183 to 198 0.3 to 0.6 — 0.02 to 0.35 25 to 35 6.8 to 10.3
— 4.3 4.7 60.4 30.6 —
<1.0 4.0 to 5.0 3.0 to 5.0 50.0 to 65.0 25.0 to 35.0 <0.1
0.5 2.8 22.4 74.1
— — — —
β
Notes: S = saturated, U = unsaturated, AOM = active oxygen method.
32
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
1.15 HIGH-OLEIC SUNFLOWER OIL Russian scientists used chemical mutagenesis and selective breeding to alter the sunflower plant to create a high-oleic variety stable to climate conditions. High-oleic sunflower seed was grown commercially in the United States for the first time in 1984. The United States developed progenies from the Russian cultivar that varied only 4 to 5% in oleic fatty acid content when grown in the cool climates of Minnesota or the warm conditions in Texas. Growers in the United States also developed a hybrid sunflower with substantially reduced linoleic fatty acid content in favor of oleic with more uniform results.80 About 300,000 metric tons of high-oleic sunflower oil are produced annually (less than 5% of the world production of sunflower oil), most of it in the United States and France. This specialty oil has been found useful in food products, such as spray oils for snacks, crackers, and breakfast cereals; for frying oils; for special foods for infants and the elderly, and for other products requiring a liquid oil with an exceptional oxidative stability.74 1.15.1 High-Oleic Sunflower Oil Physical Properties and Composition Oxidative stability improvement, a major objective for developing high-oleic sunflower oil, was achieved with the reduction of linoleic fatty acids. Typical physical characteristics and composition for high-oleic sunflower oil are as follows:11,49,50,81 High-Oleic Sunflower Oil Composition and Physical Properties Characteristics Specific gravity, 25/25°C Refractive index, 25°C Iodine value Saponification number Unsaponifiable matter, % Melting point, °C Cold test, hours Wax, %
Typical
Range
—
0.912 to 0.915
1.4670
1.467 to 1.469
83 —
188 to 194
1.2 — 15 dewaxed —
78 to 88 0.8 to 2.0 4.4 to 7.2 — 0.2 to 0.35
AOM stability, hours
40
38 to 100
Oxidative stability index (110°C), hours
12
11.3 to 33
α-tocopherol
262
β-tocopherol
2
94 to 430 —
γ-tocopherol
1
Tocopherol content, ppm
—
Fatty acid composition, % C-14:0 Myristic
—
<0.1
C-16:0 Palmitic
3.7
3.0 to 4.8
Raw Materials
33
High-Oleic Sunflower Oil Composition and Physical Properties (Continued) Characteristics
Typical
Range
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
0.1
<0.1
C-18:0 Stearic
5.4
2.7 to 6.5
C-18:1 Oleic
81.3
75.0 to 85.0
C-18:2 Linoleic
9.0 —
8.0 to 10.0
0.4 —
0.2 to 0.5
0.1 —
0.5 to 1.1
C-18:3 Linolenic C-20:0 Arachidic C-20:1 Gadoleic C-22:0 Behenic C-22:1 Erucic
<0.3 0.1 to 0.5 <0.1
Triglyceride composition, % SSS Trisaturated
0
— —
SUS Disaturated
5.6
SUU Monosaturated
13.8
—
UUU Triunsaturated
84.4
—
Hydrogenated crystal habit
β
Notes: S = saturated, U = unsaturated, AOM = active oxygen method.
1.16 SAFFLOWER OIL Safflower, Carthamus tinctorius L., is among the oldest crops known. The species is believed to be indigenous to Southeast Asia, but has long been cultivated in China, the Near East, and northern Africa. Immigrants from Spain and Portugal brought the safflower to the United States. Until recent years, the history of safflower has been concerned almost entirely with the use of its florets, from which carthamine (a dye) was extracted. Later, the introduction of other more stable dyes replaced this use for the safflower plant. Safflower was a relatively insignificant oilseed crop until the early 1950s, when higher yielding, oil-bearing varieties were developed and it was established as a source oil for surface coatings. The composition of safflower oil is largely made up of linoleic fatty acid with a very low level of linolenic acid, which results in very nearly an ideal drying oil. Interest in the ability of the unsaturated liquid oil to lower serum cholesterol levels catalyzed the development of an edible grade of safflower oil.82,83 1.16.1 Safflower Oil Composition and Physical Properties Safflower oil is obtained by pressing the seed or by solvent extraction. Safflower oil occupies a unique position in that it has the highest level of linoleic (C-18:2) fatty acid available commercially. The typical characteristics for safflower oil are as follows:8,11,46
34
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Safflower Oil Composition and Physical Properties Characteristics
Typical
Range
Specific gravity, 25/25°C
—
0.919 to 0.924
Refractive index, 25°C
—
1.473 to 1.476
145.0 —
141 to 147
Unsaponifiable matter, %
—
0.3 to 0.6
Titer, °C
—
15 to 17
Melting point, °C
—
–18 to –16
Solidification point, °C
—
–13 to –18 —
Iodine value Saponification number
Cold test, hours Wax, % AOM stability, hours
24 dewaxed 0.5
186 to 194
—
2
1 to 3
0.6
0.3 to 0.9
α-tocopherol
445
230 to 660
β-tocopherol
10
0 to 20
γ-tocopherol
8
0 to 15
8
0 to 15
Oxidative stability index (110°C), hours Tocopherol content, ppm
Tocotrienol content, ppm δ-tocotrienol Fatty acid composition, % C-14:0 Myristic
0.1
C-16:0 Palmitic
6.8
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
0.1
— 4.0 to 7.0 —
C-18:0 Stearic
2.3
1.0 to 2.5
C-18:1 Oleic
12.0
12.0 to 16.0
C-18:2 Linoleic
77.7
75.0 to 79.0
C-18:3 Linolenic
0.4
C-20:0 Arachidic
0.3
<0.4 —
C-20:1 Gadoleic
0.1
—
C-22:1 Behenic
0.2
—
SUU Monosaturate
18.0
—
UUU Triunsaturated
82.0
—
Triglyceride composition, %
Hydrogenated crystal habit
β
Notes: S = saturated, U = unsaturated, AOM = active oxygen method.
Safflower oil has an appeal to health-conscious consumers. Linoleic, its principal fatty acid, is an essential fatty acid that cannot be synthesized by the human body. It is required for ensuring the integrity of plasma membranes and for growth, reproduction, skin maintenance, and general body functioning. The health benefits of conjugated linoleic fatty acids are also attracting interest. The potential therapeutic
Raw Materials
35
properties are that it is anticarcinogenic, antiatheroscleratic, growth promoting, and lean body-mass enhancing. Safflower oil is the natural raw material for the production of conjugated linoleic fatty acid.84 The oxidative stability of crude safflower oil precludes storage for indefinite periods before processing. Generally, standard active oxygen method (AOM) stabilities of crude safflower oil without added antioxidants range from four to eight hours shortly after crushing, which reduces to one to three hours after two to four months of normal storage. Thus, it is obvious that safflower oil with its high linoleic fatty acid content and a low level of natural antioxidants is not particularly stable. Safflower oil has been used in food products where a high polyunsaturated fatty acid content is desired. It has been utilized in mayonnaise, salad dressings, and liquid margarine and was the original source oil for the first soft tub margarine. Flavor stability has been a constant problem with products containing appreciable quantities of safflower oil due to the high linoleic fatty acid content. Safflower oil is readily hydrogenated in conventional processing equipment. Hydrogenation improves oxidative stability, and the products can be used in margarine or shortening products to replace the usual β-crystal habit basestocks. However, the oxidative stability of hydrogenated safflower is significantly less than similar products produced with soybean oil or corn oil hardened to the same degree.85 1.17 HIGH-OLEIC SAFFLOWER OIL A safflower plant natural mutation, discovered by researchers at the University of California at Davis, produces an oil in which the normal levels of linoleic and oleic fatty acids are reversed (i.e., high levels of oleic instead of linoleic). Consequently, the oil has a substantially improved oxidative stability over normal safflower oil due to the replacement of the polyunsaturates with monounsaturates. An added benefit derived from the safflower mutation is that the plant and seeds can be produced at the same costs as normal safflower in a wider range of climates.86 Fatty acid compositions of the oil for both the high-linoleic and high-oleic types of safflower have been found to be remarkably uniform at different growing temperature conditions. The slight variations experienced with both types included an increase in oleic at higher growing temperatures and an increase in linoleic at lower growing temperatures. These results indicate that both safflower oil types should provide very uniform and reliable product results for each crop year.87 1.17.1 High-Oleic Safflower Oil Composition and Physical Characteristics High-oleic safflower oil has retained the light color and flavor characteristics of normal safflower oil, but the oxidative stability measured by AOM stability analysis has increased by three and a half times. Typical characteristics for high-oleic safflower oil are as follows:47,81,88
36
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
High-Oleic Safflower Oil Composition and Physical Properties Characteristics Specific gravity, 25/25°C Refractive index, 25°C Iodine value Saponification number Unsaponifiable matter, %
Typical
Range
—
0.910 to 0.920
1.468
1.467 to 1.469
87 —
186 to 197
—
85 to 95 1.5 max —
Melting point, °C
–17
Cold test, hours
24+ dewaxed
—
Wax, %
0.5
—
AOM stability, hours
40
35 to 45
Oxidative stability index (110°C), hours
12
0.9 to 13
0.1
<0.1 5.0 to 6.0
Fatty acid composition, % C-12:0 Lauric C-16:0 Palmitic
3.6
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
0.1
<0.2
C-18:0 Stearic
5.2
1.5 to 2.0
C-18:1 Oleic
81.5
74.0 to 80.0
C-18:2 Linoleic
7.2
13.0 to 18.0
C-18:3 Linolenic
0.1
<0.2
C-20:0 Arachidic
0.4
<0.3
C-20:1 Gadoleic
0.2
<0.2
C-22:0 Behenic
1.2
C-24:1 Lignoceric
0.3
<.02 —
Triglyceride composition, % 1.1
—
SUU Monosaturated
15.9
—
UUU Triunsaturated
77.8
—
SUS Disaturated
Hydrogenated crystal habit
β
Notes: S = saturated, U = unsaturated, AOM = active oxygen method.
The relationship between the degree of unsaturation of lipids and their susceptibility to oxidative deterioration is well documented. Early kinetic studies on oxidation of fatty acids noted the different oxidation rates of linoleic and oleic fatty acids. The slower rate for oleic and the saturated fatty acids has been a major reason to hydrogenate oils. Elimination of one fatty acid double bond significantly increases the resistance to oxidation.89 Utilization of oils from Nature that are rich in oleic fatty acid also avoids some of the side effects of hydrogenation, such as trans acids and hydrogenation flavor. Frying evaluations have shown that high-oleic safflower is an excellent frying oil. It resisted oxidation and polymerization better than a hydrogenated frying shortening in controlled testing90 and had acceptable potato chip stability ratings equivalent to hydrogenated frying oil products.89 Other probable
Raw Materials
37
applications would be wherever a high-stability liquid oil is desirable (applications similar to those proposed for high-oleic sunflower oil). 1.18 CANOLA OIL Canola is the registered trademark of the Canola Council of Canada for the genetically modified seed, oil, and meal derived from rapeseed cultivars, Brassica napus and B. campestris. Rapeseed is one of the oldest vegetable oils known, but its edible use has been limited because of high levels of erucic fatty acid (C-22:1) and glucosinolates. Oils high in erucic fatty acid have been shown to cause heart muscle lesions followed by other cardiac problems, and the presence of glucosinolates in meal reduce its nutritive value as an animal feed. The world’s first low-erucic, lowglucosinolate rapeseed cultivar was released in 1974. In response to a petition from Canada, the United States affirmed low erucic acid rapeseed oil (LEAR oil) as a food substance generally recognized as safe (GRAS) in 1985. In 1988, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) agreed that LEAR oil (2.0% maximum) could be identified as canola oil. LEAR (canola), developed through conventional plant breeding from double-low oilseed varieties, has become the world’s third-leading source of vegetable oil and meal in less than 30 years.91 Commodity canola oil, with its low level of saturated fatty acids and containing both omega-6 and omega-3 essential fatty acids, is perceived as a healthful oil.92 1.18.1 Canola Oil Composition and Physical Properties Canola seed is flaked and cooked to inactivate the enzyme myrosinase to prevent hydrolysis of glucosinolates into undesirable breakdown products. The oil is extracted from the cooked flake by pressing and solvent extraction procedures. Usually, the crude canola oil is degummed to remove the water-hydrated gums to phosphorus levels of approximately 240 ppm with water degumming or approximately 50 ppm with acid degumming procedures. Typical characteristics for degummed canola oil are as follows:14,47,69,75,91,93 Canola Oil Composition and Physical Properties Characteristics
Typical
Range
Specific gravity, 25/25°C
—
0.914 to 0.920
Refractive index, 25°C
—
1.465 to 1.467
Iodine value
110 to 126
Saponification number
115 —
Unsaponifiable matter, %
—
Titer, °C
26
Melting point, °C
–9
—
Cloud point, °C
–5
—
Cold test, hours
24 dewaxed
—
188 to 193 0.5 to 1.2 —
38
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Canola Oil Composition and Physical Properties (Continued) Characteristics Wax, %
Typical
Range —
Sulfur, ppm
0.2 —
3 to 15
Chlorophyll A, ppm
—
5 to 35
AOM stability, hours
18
12 to 20
Oxidative stability index (110°C), hours
4.3
2.2 to 5
α-tocopherol
233
206 to 287
γ-tocopherol
421
392 to 465
δ-tocopherol
13
9 to 25
0.1
<0.2 2.5 to 6.0
Tocopherol content, ppm
Fatty acid composition, % C-14:0 Myristic C-16:0 Palmitic
4.1
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
0.3
<0.6
C-18:0 Stearic
1.8
0.9 to 2.1
C-18:1 Oleic
60.9
50.0 to 66.0
C-18:2 Linoleic
21.0
18.0 to 30.0
C-18:3 Linolenic
8.8
6.0 to 14.0
C-20:0 Arachidic
0.7
0.1 to 1.2
C-20:1 Gadoleic
1.0
0.1 to 4.3
C-22:0 Behenic
0.3
<0.5
C-22:1 Erucic
0.7
<1.0
C-24:0 Lignoceric
0.2
<0.2
SSS Trisaturated
0.4
—
SUS Disaturated
3.3
—
SSU Disaturated
0.1
—
SUU Monosaturated
20.2
—
UUU Triunsaturated
75.9
—
Triglyceride composition, %
Hydrogenated crystal habit
β
Notes: S = saturated, U = unsaturated, AOM = active oxygen method.
Canola oil may be the most nutritionally balanced cooking oil of all the major culinary oils. It is low in saturated fatty acids; typically it contains 7% saturated fatty acids, the lowest level of all non-GMO (genetically modified oils) vegetable oils. It has a high monounsaturated fatty acid content, oleic (C-18:1), which has been shown to reduce serum cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels without impacting HDL cholesterol. It is a good source of alpha-linolenic (C-18:3) omega-3 fatty acid, an essential fatty acids that reduces all-cause mortality and various cardiovascular disease events. And finally, canola oil contains the nutritionally preferred balance of omega-6 to omega-3 essential fatty acids: a 2 to 1 ratio.94
Raw Materials
39
Canola oil’s distribution of the two fatty acids important for flavor stability, linoleic and linolenic, have been found primarily in the sn-2 position of the triglyceride similar to high-erucic rapeseed oil. This differs from other oils, which usually have a random distribution for linoleic and linolenic fatty acids, and the somewhat lower total unsaturation indicates better resistance to oxidation than oils with similar linoleic and linolenic fatty acid contents. Canola oil differs from most other vegetable oils by its content of chlorophyll and sulfur compounds. Removal of these compounds during processing is required for acceptable product quality. Pretreatment of the crude oil with 0.05 to 0.5% phosphoric acid not only helps precipitate phosphatidic materials, but also aids in chlorophyll removal. Bleaching with acid-activated clays is essential for chlorophyll removal. Chlorophyll removal is most important at the prebleach stage. Chlorophyll cannot be heat bleached in hydrogenation or deodorization, but must be removed during bleaching. Hydrogenation or deodorization of inadequately bleached canola oil fixes the green color and makes it almost impossible to adsorb on bleaching earth (an adsorbent clay that will remove coloring from oils). The hydrogenation equipment and conditions, such as temperature, pressures, and catalyst are essentially the same for canola oil as those required for soybean oil; however, a higher catalyst concentration may be necessary due to the presence of low levels of sulfur compounds (3 to 5 ppm) remaining after refining and bleaching, which can poison the hydrogenation catalyst.95 Canola oil is a natural winter oil that does not require fractionation to remove a hard fraction that could crystallize at refrigerator temperatures; however, most canola crushers solvent-extract the seed and hull together for operational efficiency. The seed hulls contain waxes that are soluble in the oil. Sediment analysis identified wax esters of carbon number C-24 to C-52 and triglycerides composed of PPO, PPP, PSO, and PPS (P = palmitic, O = oleic, S = stearic).96 These waxes solidify in canola oil stored at temperatures between –5°C (23°F) and 21°C (70°F) more rapidly than at lower temperatures and the standard cold test does not identify this deficiency. However, the waxes solidify after a period of time in retail bottled oil to appear as an unsightly thread or layer of solidified material. An effective cold test evaluation was devised by mixing the oil with 70% acetone. The oils with wax contamination clouded after six hours at 0°C.97 The sediment material must be removed by a dewaxing process for oils intended for the retail market. The formation of large β crystals limits the level of hydrogenated canola oil that can be utilized in margarine or shortening formulations. Hydrogenated canola oil crystals grow larger over time to produce a sandy or grainy consistency unless the crystal habit is modified by the addition of a β′ crystal former. 1.18.2 Genetically Modified Canola Oil After the successful development and introduction of canola, the genetic modification efforts focused on improved canola hybrids. The agronomic goals to increase field yields; improve frost resistance; increase oil and meal contents; and improve disease, insect, and herbicide resistance were met, in most cases, by using genetic
40
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 1.6 Genetically Modified Canola Oil
Fatty Acid, %
Canola
Low Linolenic Canola
High Oleic Canola
High Lauric Canola
C-12:0
Lauric
0
0
0
C-14:0
Myristic
0.1
0.1
0.1
37.0 4.4
C-16:0
Palmitic
4.2
3.8
3.0
3.2 0.3
C-16:1
Palmitoleic
0.3
0.3
0.3
C-18:0
Stearic
2.3
2.4
2.0
1.3
C-18:1
Oleic
62.5
64.1
73.7
31.5
C-18:2
Linoleic
19.2
23.8
14.4
13.1
C-18:3
Linolenic
7.9
2.1
2.9
6.7 0.5
C-20:0
Arachidic
0.7
0.7
0.7
C-20:1
Gadoleic
1.3
1.2
1.4
1.0
C-20:2
Eicosadienoic
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
C-22:0
Behenic
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
C-22:1
Erucic
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.2
C-24:0
Lignoceric
0
0
0.2
0
C-24:1
Nervonic
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
109.5
103.6
97.7
38.8
Iodine value, calculated
engineering technology. The programs to further modify the fatty acid profiles have also achieved their goals. Oilseed modifications to reduce saturates and linolenic, increase oleic or saturates, and to develop a canola variety with a high-lauric fattyacid content have all been developed. The results of some of the modifications are compared to normal canola oil in Table 1.6.75 High-lauric canola oil was commercially available, but apparently failed to gain consumer acceptance. This failure was attributed to economics, not performance. 1.19 OLIVE OIL The olive tree, Olea europea L., capable of surviving several hundred years, thrives in temperate and tropical climates. Although its origin is unknown, it probably originated in ancient Iran and Turkestan and spread west to Anatolia, Syria, and Israel. Archeological excavations in Israel have uncovered olive wood dating back to 42,980 B.C. The olive industry appears to have been established throughout the region bordering the Mediterranean from Palestine and Syria to Greece in the middle and late Bronze age. The International Olive Oil Council has promulgated the following definitions for olive oil:98
1. Virgin olive oil is the oil from the fruit of the olive tree obtained by mechanical or other physical means under conditions, particularly thermal, that do not lead to
Raw Materials
41
alteration of the oil. Virgin olive oil suitable for consumption as is and can be designated as “natural” is further defined as: a. Extra virgin olive oil: Oil that has a flavor rating of 6.5 or better and a 1.0 max free acidity. b. Fine virgin olive oil: Oil that has a flavor rating of 5.5 or better and a 1.5 max free acidity. c. Semifine virgin olive oil: Oil that has a flavor rating of 3.5 or more and a 3.3 max free acidity. 2. Virgin olive oil with an organoleptic rating of less than 3.5 or a 3.3 g/100 g free fatty acid is considered not fit for human consumption. It is used to produce refined olive oil or for nonfood uses. 3. Refined olive oil is the oil obtained from virgin olive oil by refining methods, which do not lead to alterations in the initial triglyceride structure. 4. Olive oil can consist of a blend of refined olive oil and virgin olive oil in various proportions.
1.19.1 Olive Oil Composition and Physical Properties Olive oil usually has a greenish-yellow color and a characteristic olive flavor and odor. The color of virgin oil is mainly related to the presence of chlorophyll and pheophytin, which also provide oxidation protection in the dark. Carotenoids also contribute to the color and protect the oil from photooxidation. The distinctive olive oil aroma and flavor are generated by a number of volatile compounds present at extremely low concentrations. Olive cultivar, origin, maturity stage of the fruit, storage conditions, and fruit processing influence the flavor components of olive oil and, therefore, its taste and aroma. Good grades of olive oil are consumed without the usual edible oil processing after extraction. The high levels of free fatty acid in olive oil may be attributed to bruising of the fruit at harvest or the high moisture content in olive fruits, which is favorable to enzyme action. Either a high free fatty acid or diglyceride content is an indicator for low-quality olive oil. Virgin olive oil is a high-value product relative to other vegetable oils, thus providing a strong economic incentive for adulteration. One of the most common adulterants is refined hazelnut oil; up to 20% can be added without detection by the consumer or fatty acid composition analysis.99 Fatty acid composition analyses do not provide a clear-cut indication of adulteration; triacylglycerol profiles give more definite indicators of adulteration. Typical characteristics for olive oil are as follows:8,14,15,100 Olive Oil Composition and Physical Properties Characteristics
Typical —
0.909 to 0.915
Refractive index, 25°C
—
1.4680 to 1.4705
Iodine value Saponification number
82 —
188 to 196
Unsaponifiable matter, %
—
0.4 to 1.1
Specific gravity, 25/25°C
Range
80 to 88
42
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Olive Oil Composition and Physical Properties (Continued) Characteristics Titer, °C Melting point, °C
Typical —
Solidification point, °C
0.0 —
Cloud point, °C
–5.6
Cold test, hours
none
Wax, ppm Chlorophyll A, ppm
350 —
AOM stability, hours
22
Oxidative stability index (110°C), hours
5.7
Range 17 to 26 — 2.0 to –6.0 — none — 10 to 30 — —
Tocopherol content, ppm α-tocopherol
103
63 to 135
γ-tocopherol
8
7 to 15
Fatty acid composition, % C-14:0 Myristic
—
<0.1
C-16:0 Palmitic
9.0
7.5 to 20.0
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
0.6 —
0.3 to 3.5
C-17:0 Margaric C-18:0 Stearic
2.7
0.5 to 5.0
C-18:1 Oleic
80.3
55.0 to 83.0
C-18:2 Linoleic
6.3
3.5 to 21.0
<0.3
C-18:3 Linolenic
0.7
<0.9
C-20:0 Arachidic
<0.6
C-20:1 Gadoleic
0.4 —
C-22:0 Behenic
—
<0.2
C-24:0 Lignoceric
—
<0.3
0.1 to 0.4
Triglyceride composition, % SUS Disaturated
5.6
0 to 6.0
SUU Monosaturated
38.3
20.5 to 34.0
UUU Triunsaturated
56.7
52.5 to 79.0
Hydrogenated crystal habit
β
Notes: S = saturated, U = unsaturated, AOM = active oxygen method.
Olive oil contains triglycerides composed mainly of monounsaturated oleic fatty acid. Only 10 to 18% of the olive oil fatty acids are saturated. The oleic fatty acid content varies depending on the producing area and climate. Like most other vegetable oils, olive oil develops more unsaturates in cold climates and with advanced maturity of the fruit. The high oleic and low linoleic fatty acid contents help make olive oil more resistant to oxidation than most liquid oils. Virgin olive oil has low tocopherol levels, 63 to 135 ppm α-tocopherol, depending on the fruit maturation,
Raw Materials
43
but the ratio to polyunsaturates is ideal. Additionally, the chlorophylls degrade into pheophytins for oxidative stability. The polyphenols are usually removed from other vegetable oils during processing.8 Researchers have found that the phenols in olive oil have antiinflammatory antioxidant and clot preventing capabilities, which assist in heart health.101 The concentration of these substances in the olive fruit vary a great deal according to the area of production, cultivar, climate, harvest time, and storage time before milling.102 Light causes significant deterioration in olive oil quality in the presence of air. The oil will develop an off-flavor from oxidation and become colorless due to the loss of chlorophyll and carotene. A storage life in excess of two years was demonstrated by olive oil evaluations of hermetically closed glass bottles stored in the dark.103 Squalene found in virgin olive oil at concentrations ranging from 0.7 to 12 g/kg accounts for more than 50% of the unsaponifiable fraction of the oil. Squalene is a highly unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbon, C30H50, with important biological properties. It is a metabolic precursor of cholesterol. A chemopreventive effect of squalene on some forms of cancer has been reported. Squalene also provides moderate antioxidant properties that are lost during storage.19 1.20 palm Oil The principal oil palm of commerce, Elaesis guineensis, which originated in western Africa, has spread to most parts of the tropical and subtropical zones of the world, but particularly to Malaysia and Indonesia. It thrives best within a 10° band of the equator. The oil palm tree has the appearance of a date palm with a large head of pinnate feathery fronds growing from a sturdy trunk. The fruit grows in bunches weighing 22 to 110 pounds and each containing 800 to 2000 individual fruits. The fruit consists of an outer pulp, which is the source of the crude palm oil; an inner shell, which is used for fuel; and two or three kernels, which are the source of another oil type: palm kernel.104 Oil palms produce the world’s highest-yielding crop of edible oil per acre unit — one acre of oil palm land can produce as much oil annually as 10 acres of land planted to soybeans. 1.20.1 Palm Oil Composition and Physical Properties Palm oil, which consists mainly of triglycerides of palmitic and oleic fatty acids, is semisolid at room temperature. Crude palm oil has a deep orange-red color contributed by a high carotene content, 500 to 700 ppm, of which 90% consists of alphaand beta-carotene. The dark red color can be heat bleached to low levels when the carotene has not been oxidized and fixed; abused crude palm oil may develop a brown color, which is very difficult to remove. Red palm oil, processed to retain the carotene content with low temperature distillation, has been marketed as a healthful oil and utilized as a natural colorant for margarine and shortening products. Crude palm oil has a characteristic “nutty” or “fruity” flavor that can be removed easily with steam refining. Physical refining has been found superior
44
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
to caustic refining for palm oil. Some natural antioxidant protection is provided by a mixture of tocotrienols (~73%) and tocopherols (~27%) in the range of 600 to 1000 ppm. Physical refining reduces these natural antioxidants by about half. Processed palm oil generally develops a slight, distinctive violet-like odor with oxidation. The oxidative stability of palm oil is affected by the presence of high levels of beta-carotene, which acts as a prooxidant even in the presence of tocopherol/tocotrienol concentrations, therefore, it is better to inventory refined and bleached palm oil rather than crude. Typical characteristics for crude palm oil are as follows:105-108 Palm Oil Composition and Physical Properties Characteristics
Typical
Range
Specific gravity, 50°C
—
0.888 to 0.889
Refractive index, 50°C
—
1.455 to 1.456
Iodine value
53
46 to 56
Saponification number
196
190 to 202
Unsaponifiable matter, %
0.5
0.15 to 0.99
Titer, °C
46.3
40.7 to 49.0
Mettler dropping point, °C
37.5 —
35.5 to 45.0 35.0 to 42.0
none —
500 to 700
54
53 to 60
16.9
16.6 to 19.0
Solidification point, °C Cold test, hours Carotene content, mg/kg AOM stability, hours Oxidative stability index (110°C), hours
none
Tocopherol content, ppm α-tocopherol
172
129 to 215
β-tocopherol
30
22 to 37
γ-tocopherol
26
19 to 32
δ-tocopherol
13
10 to 16
Tocotrienol content, ppm α-tocotrienol
59
44 to 73
β-tocotrienol
59
44 to 73
γ-tocotrienol
350
262 to 437
δ-tocotrienol
94
70 to 117
0
0.1 to 1.0
Fatty acid composition, % C-12:0 Lauric C-14:0 Myristic
1.1
0.9 to 1.5
C-16:0 Palmitic
44.0
41.8 to 46.8
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
0.1
0.1 to 0.3
C-18:1 Stearic
4.5
4.5 to 5.1
C-18:1 Oleic
39.2
37.3 to 40.8
C-18:2 Linoleic
10.1
9.1 to 11.0
Raw Materials
45
Palm Oil Composition and Physical Properties (Continued) Characteristics
Typical
Range
C-18:3 Linolenic
0.4
0.4 to 0.6
C-20:0 Arachidic
0.4
0.2 to 0.7
Triglyceride composition, % SSS Trisaturated
6.4
0.8 to 9.0
SUS Disaturated
44.7
38.5 to 50.3
SUU Monosaturated
37.7
31.8 to 44.4
UUU Triunsaturated
6.5
4.8 to 9.8
Diglycerides, %
4.9
3.0 to 7.6
Solids fat index at: 10.0°C/50°F
34.5
30.0 to 39.0
21.1°C/70°F
14.0
11.5 to 17.0
26.7°C/80°F
11.0
8.0 to 14.0
33.3°C/92°F
7.4
4.0 to 11.0
37.8°C/100°F
5.6
2.5 to 9.0
40.0°C/104°F
4.7
2.0 to 7.0
Crystal habit
β′
Notes: S = saturated, U = unsaturated, AOM = active oxygen method.
Palm oil has a characteristic fatty acid composition, quite different from other commodity oils; it contains almost equal portions of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids. It is unique among vegetable oils because a significant amount of the saturated fatty acids (10 to 16%) are in the sn-2 position of its triglycerides. It is also distinguished from other oils by a very high level of palmitic fatty acid. This compares with a typical level of 21.6% for cottonseed oil, which is the vegetable oil with the next highest palmitic fatty acid level available in the United States. Hydrogenated hardstocks or a stearin fraction from both of these source oils, cottonseed and palm, have been utilized to induce a β´ crystal habit. Palm oil contains components with nutritional and beneficial health properties. These phytonutrients include carotenoids, vitamin E, sterols, phospholipids, glycolipids, and squalene. Even though palm oil contains ~50% saturated fatty acids and induce a higher blood cholesterol level than seed oils, its consumption is reported to provide a reduced risk of arterial thrombosis and atherosclerosis, inhibition of endogenous cholesterol biosynthesis, platelet aggregation, and a reduction in blood pressure. The tocotrienols and the isometric position of its fatty acids are credited as the cause of these positive nutritive reactions.109 The structural or physical properties of palm oil are similar to those of tallow and lard; however, based on the crystal habit characteristics, its similarity is limited to tallow. It could be a candidate for replacement of a modified or interesterified lard, which changes from a β to a β′ crystal habit with randomization. The physical characteristics for unhardened palm oil are similar to hydrogenated basestocks prepared
46
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 1.7 Fractionated Palm Oil Characteristics Palm Oil Fraction Characteristics
Whole
Olein
Softening Point, °C
31–38
19–24
44–56
Titer, °C
42–46
—
46–54
0.892–0.893
—
— 0.882–0.891
Density at 50/25°C Density at 60/25°C
Stearine
—
0.909–0.903
51–55
51–61
22–49
190–202
194–202
193–206
Cloud Point, °C
—
6–12
—
Unsaponifiable Matter, %
—
—
0.1–1.0
Iodine Value Saponification Value
Solid Fat Content (NMR) at: 10°C–50°F
47–56
28–52
54–91
20°C–68°F
20–27
3–9
31–87 16–74
30°C–86°F
6–11
0
40°C–104°F
1–6
—
7–57
50°C–122°F
—
—
0–40
Fatty Acid Composition, % C-14:0 Myristic
1–1.5
1–1.5
1–2
C-16:0 Palmitic
42–47
38–42
47–74
C-18:0 Stearic C-18:1 Oleic C-18:2 Linoleic
4–5
4–5
4–6
37–41
40–44
16–37
9–11
10–13
3–10
Triglyceride Composition, % SSS Trisaturated
0.8–9.0
0.1–0.3
22.2
SUS Disaturated
38.5–50.3
37.6–46.1
43.9
SUU Monosaturated
31.8–44.4
41.3–49.1
25.6
UUU Triunsaturated
4.8–9.8
6.4–8.4
3.9
Disaturate, %
3.0–7.6
4.7–6.1
4.5
188.2
179
50
Natural Antioxidant Content, μg/g Tocopherol: α-tocopherol β-tocopherol
ND
ND
ND
γ-tocopherol
ND
17.6
ND
δ-tocopherol
ND
ND
ND
198.1
219.9
47.4
Tocotrienol: α-tocotrienol β-tocotrienol
10
8.1
9
γ-tocotrienol
198.8
332.7
134.9
δ-tocotrienol
98.4
67
31.4
Total Antioxidant
693.5
824.3
272.8
Raw Materials
47
from various vegetable oils, but with mutual crystal habit characteristics limited to hydrogenated cottonseed oil. Palm oil appears to have a built in crystal modifier to effect a slow crystallization behavior confirmed by x-ray studies that showed an unusually long α to β′ transition time.107 The long lifetime is induced by the nontriglycerides, the most probable being diglycerides, and the presence of a high percentage of the symmetrical monounsaturated triacyl group or saturate–unsaturate–saturate (SUS) with palmitic–oleic– palmitic (POP) predominating.110 Slow crystallization can result in posthardening and graininess in plasticized products when the palm oil level exceeds 15 to 25%. Palm oil benefits from all of the modification techniques. It is easy to fractionate, it has a good oxidative stability, and interesterification significantly modifies its crystallization behavior. Interesterified, fractionated, and fully hydrogenated palm oil products do not have the characteristic slow crystallization. Low-iodine-value, hydrogenated palm oil is an excellent shortening hardstock, which helps extend the plastic range and tolerance to high temperatures. Malaysia is a leading producer of palm oil and a major exporter of processed palm oil products. Palm oil is available as crude, RBD, and fractionated as olein, midfraction, and stearine. Typical physical characteristics for the olein and stearin fractions are compared with regular palm oil in Table 1.7.108,111,112 Palmitic fatty acid tends to migrate to the stearin fraction; however, the olein fatty acid content is similar to regular palm oil in spite of fractionation. Normally, the criterion for palm olein is that the cloud point should be below 10°C (50°F). Cloud point refers to the temperature at which the oil turns cloudy while cooling at a rate of 1°C per minute. Most of the olein products have iodine value results within a relatively narrow range (56 to 58), but the stearin fractions exhibit a wide range (25 to 49). The palm stearine softening point ranges relate directly to the fractionation process utilized: 56 to 53°C for the detergent process, 51 to 50°C for the slow-dry process, and 49 to 46°C for the fast-dry process. Palm oil contains 94 to 98% triglycerides, with the remainder made up of minor components. Most of the minor components become concentrated in the olein fraction, that is, fatty acids, diglycerides, carotene, sterols, tocopherols, tocotrienols, peroxides, and oxidized products. The phospholipids and metals, such as iron, migrate predominantly to the stearin fraction; the phosphorus concentration in the stearin may show a threefold increase from the original level in the crude palm oil.113 Therefore, the stability of palm oil stearin is usually lower, especially with physical refining, because of the low tocopherol/tocotrienol content and the iron concentration. 1.20.2 Genetically Modified Palm Oil Palm oil yields in Malaysia have increased fourfold in the past 50 years, primarily due to plant breeding improvements. Nearly all of the palm plantings were hybrid seeds from traditional crossing techniques until cloning of the oil palm by in vitro tissue culture was begun around 1977. Oil palm breeding programs have concentrated on high fruit yield, high mesocarp percentage, high oil yield, and disease resistance;
48
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
however, other traits such as less saturated oil, higher kernel content, shorter trees, pest resistance, and an increase of the minor components (carotenoids, vitamin E, sterols, etc.) have also been considered. Recently, oil palm breeding efforts have been concentrated somewhat on another palm species, Elaesis oleifera, which is native to South America. It offers the possibilities of increasing oil unsaturation to a 85 iodine value (IV) from a typical 53 IV; higher carotene, tocopherol, and sterol content; slowing of the yearly tree height increment; and resistance to certain diseases. This oil palm has not been commercialized due to substantially lower yields than the African stock. Hybrids from this cultivar are probably in the elite planting series recently introduced that offers greater oil yield and a different fatty acid composition.114 Oil palm breeders, like the oilseed researchers, are also exploring the potential of genetic engineering techniques. Some of the potential specialty oils considered are (1) high stearic fatty acid oil for the production of a cocoa butter substitute, (2) high carotene oil for vitamin A and natural colorant, (3) high tocopherol content for oxidative stability and vitamin E production, and (4) higher levels of unsaturates for the production of salad oils.114 1.21 coconut Oil Coconut palms, Cocos nucifera L., are traditionally found in coastal regions in Asia and the Pacific islands within 20° north and south latitudes. The native habitat is unknown, and a popular theory is that coconuts were carried by sea currents and washed ashore where they then germinated. Coconuts require a growing temperature of 75 to 85°F and never less than 68°F, with an evenly dispersed rainfall of 60 to 80 inches per year. The trees start to bear fruit after 5 to 6 years and can continue to do so for as much as 60 years. Coconuts ripen in 9 to 12 months and can be harvested year-round, so labor can be spread evenly over the year. The Philippines is the most important producing and exporting country followed by Indonesia, India, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, and Thailand.115 Copra is the trade name for the dried coconut meat or kernel. The first step in making copra is to remove the husk from mature nuts, usually performed at the orchard site soon after the fruit is harvested. Next, the nut is opened for drying to produce the copra. Coconut oil is removed from the copra by pressing, solvent extraction, and other patented procedures.116 1.21.1 Coconut Oil Composition and Physical Properties Coconut oil is a commercially important oil in the lauric acid group. Lauric acid oils differ significantly from other fats and oils in that they pass abruptly from a brittle solid to a liquid, within a narrow temperature range. Coconut oil is a hard brittle solid at ambient temperatures (70°F/21.1°C), but it melts sharply and completely below body temperature. The sharp melting characteristics of the lauric oils are derived from the similarity of the melting points of the triglycerides. Sharp-melting fats leave a clean, cool, nongreasy sensation on the palate, which is difficult to match with nonlauric oils. The typical characteristics for coconut oil are as follows:8,15,46,117
Raw Materials
49
Coconut Oil Composition and Physical Properties Characteristics
Typical
Range
Specific gravity, 30/30°C
—
0.915 to 0.920
Refractive index, 40°C
—
1.448 to 1.449
Iodine value
10
7.5 to 10.5
Saponification number
—
248 to 264
Unsaponifiable matter, %
—
0.1 to 0.8
Titer, °C
—
20 to 24
26.5
25 to 28
Mettler dropping point, °C Solidification point, °C
–
14 to 22
AOM stability, hours
150
30 to 250
Oxidative stability index (110°C), hours
50
8.5 to 85
6
3 to 9
49
27 to 71
C-6:0 Caproic
0.5
0.4 to 0.6
C-8:0 Caprylic
7.8
6.9 to 9.4
Tocopherol content, ppm γ-tocopherol Tocotrienol content, ppm α-tocotrienol Fatty acid composition, %
C-10:0 Capric
6.7
6.2 to 7.8
C-12:0 Lauric
47.5
45.9 to 50.3
C-14:0 Myristic
18.1
16.8 to 19.2
C-16:0 Palmitic
8.8
7.7 to 9.7
C-18:0 Stearic
2.6
2.3 to 3.2
C-18:1 Oleic
6.2
5.4 to 7.4
C-18:2 Linoleic
1.6
1.3 to 2.1
C-20:0 Arachidic
0.1
<0.2
C-20:1 Gadoleic
trace
<0.2
SSS Trisaturated
84.0
—
SUS Disaturated
12.0
—
SUU Monosaturated
4.0
—
UUU Triunsaturated
0
—
10.0°C/50°F
54.5
—
21.1°C/70°F
26.6
—
26.7°C/80°F
0
—
Crystal habit
β′
Triglyceride composition, %
Solids fat index at:
Notes: S = saturated, U = unsaturated, AOM = active oxygen method.
50
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
More than 90% of the coconut oil fatty acids are saturated, which accounts for its excellent oxidative stability. It is the richest source of medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs), which are composed of C-6, C-8, and C-10 fatty acids. Due to the high MCT content, coconut oil is a major component of infant formulas and medical foods for people who cannot absorb longer chain fatty acids. The color of coconut oil crude varies from a light yellow to brownish yellow; the National Institute of Oilseed Products (NIOP) specification limit is 15.0 maximum Lovibond red color. Normal processing techniques will produce deodorized oils with very pale yellow colors; the NIOP specification limit for cochin-type coconut oil is a 1.0 maximum Lovibond red color.11 The odor and taste of coconut oil are largely due to the presence of small quantities of lactones — less than 150 ppm. Because coconut oil is low in unsaturated fatty acids, it has a high resistance to oxidation; however, coconut oil will hydrolyze two to ten times faster than normal oils to produce a disagreeable soapy flavor. Coconut oil hydrolysis proceeds slowly in the presence of free moisture alone, but rapidly when a enzyme lipase is present in the food product. Pastry doughs and cake batters are examples of such products.
1.22 palm Kernel Oil The fruit of the palm tree, Elaeis guineenis, is the source of two distinctively different oil types. The outer pulp contains palm oil and the nut in the fruit contains kernels that are the source of palm kernel oil. Palm oil and palm kernel oil differ considerably in their characteristics and properties even though they are derived from the same plant. Palm oil is rich in C-16 and C-18 fatty acids, while palm kernel oil is rich in the C-12 fatty acid. The kernel oil is similar to coconut oil in that it is light in color, sharp melting, and high in lauric and myristic fatty acids with an excellent oxidative stability contributed by a low level of unsaturates. Palm kernels are byproducts from the palm oil mills. Kernels constitute about 45 to 48% of the palm nut. After sterilization, the palm nuts are separated from the fruit bunch. This process can be responsible for the oxidation and discoloration that affect bleachability of the extracted oil if not properly controlled. After separation, the nuts are dried and cracked, and the kernels are separated from the shell. Palm kernel oil is extracted by mechanical pressure screw pressing, solvent extraction, or preprocessing followed by solvent extraction. Prior to extraction by any of the methods, the kernels are cleaned and flaked to rupture the oil cells. After extraction, any remaining fines, solids, or other impurities are removed with a filter press.118 Malaysian oil-palm breeding programs have emphasized mesocrap content, which contains palm oil at the expense of the kernel oil. The kernel/bunch content of recent oil palm-planting materials was 4 to 8%; however, a new series of planting materials has now been developed that produces a kernel/bunch content of more than 10%.119
Raw Materials
51
1.22.1 Palm Kernel Oil Composition and Physical Properties Typical physical properties and characteristics for palm kernel oil are as follows:8,15,49,105,120 Palm Kernel Oil Composition and Physical Properties Characteristics Specific gravity, 30/30°C Refractive index, 40°C
Typical
Range
—
0.860 to 0.873
1.451
1.448 to 1.452
Iodine value
17.8
14 to 21
Saponification number
245
242 to 246
Titer, °C Mettler dropping point, °C Solidification point, °C
—
20 to 25
28.3
26.8 to 29.8
—
20 to 24
AOM stability, hours
100+
15 to 100+
Oxidative stability index (110°C), hours
33+
3.0 to 33+
α-tocopherol
2.2
0 to 44
β-tocopherol
21.0
0 to 248
γ-tocopherol
8.7
0 to 257
2.3
0 to 60
C-6:0 Caproic
0.2
0.1 to 0.5
C-8:0 Caprylic
3.3
3.4 to 5.9
C-10:0 Capric
3.4
3.3 to 4.4
C-12:0 Lauric
48.2
46.3 to 51.1
C-14:0 Myristic
16.2
14.3 to 16.8
C-16:0 Palmitic
8.4
6.5 to 8.9
C-18:0 Stearic
2.5
1.6 to 2.6
C-18:1 Oleic
15.3
13.2 to 16.4
Tocopherol content, mg/kg
Tocotrienol content, mg/kg γ-tocotrienol Fatty acid composition, %
C-18:2 Linoleic
2.3
2.2 to 3.4
C-20:0 Arachidic
0.1
trace to 0.9
C-20:1 Gadoleic
0.1
trace to 0.9
Crystal habit
β′
Solids fat index at: 10.0°C/50°F
48.0
—
21.1°C/70°F
31.0
—
26.7°C/80°F
11.0
—
33.3°C/92°F
0
—
52
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Palm Kernel Oil Composition and Physical Properties (Continued) Characteristics
Typical
Range
5°C/41°F
72.8
68.0 to 76.8
10°C/50°F
67.6
61.6 to 71.2
15°C/59°F
55.7
50.7 to 60.0
20°C/68°F
40.1
34.2 to 45.5
30°C/86°F
17.1
10.2 to 21.5
Solids fat content at:
Notes: S = saturated, U = unsaturated, AOM = active oxygen method, mg/kg = milligrams/kilogram.
Palm kernel and coconut oils are somewhat alike in physical properties. The fatty acid compositions are quite similar; the amount of the principal fatty acid, lauric, is almost equivalent. Nevertheless, the slight differences in their properties have a definite effect. Palm kernel has a lower content of medium-chain fatty acids and a slightly higher oleic fatty acid content. The higher monounsaturate level is reflected in a higher iodine value and melting point. Lauric fats are among the most stable oils and fats because low unsaturated fatty acid contents present less opportunities for oxidation. However, palm kernel can develop off-flavors characterized as astringent and coarse. The short-chain fatty acids develop unpleasant soapy flavors when split into free fatty acids. Human palates are very sensitive to low levels of free caproic and caprylic fatty acids. The soapy flavors and odors of lauric oils can become serious problems with high-moisture foods. Lauric oils are substantially different from other edible fats and oils. They are solid fats at room temperature, but melt sharply and completely below body temperature and provide a pronounced cooling effect in the mouth. The high levels of relatively low-molecular weight saturated fatty acids, which are better than 50% of the composition of palm kernel oil, are the reason for the distinctive melting properties. The sharp melt, low melting point, and low unsaturates make palm kernel oil and coconut oil particularly suited as fats for low-moisture food products for applications, such as confectionery fats, candy centers, cookie fillers, nut roasting, coffee whiteners, and spray oils.121,122 1.23 LARD Meat has been a human food for thousands of years, and the use of fat from land animals in cooking extends back to antiquity. Swine, sheep, and cattle brought to North America from Europe in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries were the forebears of today’s domesticated meat animals. The fatty tissue from meat animals that is not a part of the carcass or is trimmed off from it in preparing the carcass for market is the raw material from which lard and tallow are rendered. For many generations, lard was the fat of choice for preparing doughs and batters because it
Raw Materials
53
has a plasticity at room temperature, which allows it to cream and aerate with sugar and egg yolk. Periodic lard shortages prompted the development of all-vegetable substitutes. Eventually, these products exceeded lard’s performance capabilities for creaming and aeration in bakery products. 1.23.1 Lard Physical Properties and Composition The composition and physical characteristics of lard, Sus scrofa, have wide variations related to the animal’s diet, the climate in which it was raised, and its overall structure. Hogs are monogastric and their stored fats closely resemble dietary intake; consequently, the degree of unsaturation of lard depends on the amount and fatty acid composition of the oils in the feed. Typical physical properties and composition variations in lard are as follows:49,123,124 Lard Composition and Physical Properties Characteristics Typical
Range
Specific gravity, 50°C
—
0.896 to 0.904
Refractive index, 50°C
—
1.448 to 1.460
Iodine value
57
45 to 70
Saponification number
—
192 to 203
Unsaponifiable matter, %
—
<1.0
Titer, °C
—
32 to 45
32.5
31.5 to 33.0
Mettler dropping point, °C Solidification point, °C
—
4 to –2
AOM stability, hours
54
53 to 60
16.9
16.6 to 19.0
Oxidative stability index (110°C), hours Tocopherol content, ppm α-tocopherol
172
129 to 215
β-tocopherol
30
22 to 37
γ-tocopherol
26
19 to 32
δ-tocopherol
13
10 to 16
C-10:0 Capric
0.1
—
C-12:0 Lauric
0.1
—
C-14:0 Myristic
1.5
0.5 to 2.5
C-14:1 Myristoleic
—
<0.2
C-15:0 Pentadecanoic
0.1
<0.1
C-16:0 Palmitic
26.0
20.0 to 32.0
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
3.3
1.7 to 5.0
C-17:0 Margaric
0.4
<0.5
C-17:1 Margaroleic
0.2
<0.5
C-18:0 Stearic
13.5
5.0 to 24.0
C-18:1 Oleic
43.9
36.0 to 62.0
C-18:2 Linoleic
9.5
3.0 to 16.0
Fatty acid composition, %
54
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Lard Composition and Physical Properties (Continued) Characteristics Typical Range C-18:3 Linolenic
0.4
<0.5
C-20:0 Arachidic
0.2
<1.0
C-20:1 Gadoleic
0.7
<1.0
C-20:2 Eicosadienoic
0.1
<1.0
C-20:4 Eicosatetraenoic
—
<1.0
C-22:0 Behenic
—
<1.0
—
2 to 5
Triglyceride composition, % SSS Trisaturated SUS Disaturated
—
25 to 35
SUU Monosaturated
—
50 to 60
UUU Triunsaturated
—
10 to 30
Crystal habit
β
Solids fat index at: 10.0°C/50°F
29.0
26.5 to 31.5
21.1°C/70°F
21.6
19.5 to 23.5
26.7°C/80°F
15.3
13.0 to 17.5
33.3°C/92°F
4.5
2.5 to 6.5
37.8°C/100°F
2.8
2.0 to 4.0
40.0°C/104°F
2.2
1.5 to 3.0
Notes: S = saturated, U = unsaturated, AOM = active oxygen method.
Even though lard is low in polyunsaturated fatty acids, it has an oxidative stability no better than vegetable oils with high levels of polyunsaturates. Lard is rancid at a peroxide value of 20 meq/kg as opposed to the 70- to 100-meq/kg peroxide values for most vegetable oils. This is most likely due to the absence of natural antioxidants. Lard responds well to the addition of antioxidants, such as butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), tertiary butylhydroquinone (TBHQ), and various tocopherols along with metal chelators, such as citric acid. The structure of lard contains a high percentage of medium-melting disaturated, monounsaturated triglycerides. These triglycerides are largely in a symmetrical arrangement, which causes lard to crystallize in the β form. This characteristic has restricted the use of lard to applications requiring low structural properties but high lubricity. The function of lubricity is to impart tenderness and richness while improving eating qualities by providing a feeling of satiety after eating. Major applications for lard due to the lubricity functionality are pie crusts, yeast-raised doughs, and frying. Ordinary lard is characterized by a translucence and a poor plastic range. Plasticizing with a scraped-wall heat exchanger does not improve the consistency, but further introduces an unattractive rubberiness. Addition of hardstock overcomes these difficulties and produces an attractive, fresh shortening of excellent performance, but with short duration. With age, especially at 80°F (26.7°C), graininess
Raw Materials
55
develops from the unique triglyceride composition of lard. Lard has strong β tendencies that dominate the crystal form of most blends; consequently, lard is not the basestock of choice to produce a product with a wide plastic range and a smooth consistency characteristic of the β′- crystal habit. The crystallization tendencies for lard can be modified by interesterification. Lard contains high proportions of palmitic fatty acid in the sn-2 position of its disaturated (S2U) triglycerides. In this respect, it resembles human milk fat. The proportion of C-16:0 fatty acid in the sn-2 position is decreased by about 64 to 24% on randomization, and other changes are required for lard to crystallize in the β′ phase instead of β.125 Plasticized product made from randomized lard has a better appearance because it has more and finer crystals, keeps its appearance better during storage, and has better creaming and cake-making qualities and other properties superior to those of a corresponding shortening made with natural lard. 1.24 tallow Tallow is the hard fat of ruminants. In the United States, most tallow is obtained from beef cattle, Bos taurus, and a lesser amount from the sheep, Ovis aries. All meat fats are byproducts of the meatpacking industry, which means that availability is related to meat production rather than a need for fats as a raw material. The use of meat fats for edible products has diminished due to health issues. The results of medical studies have led to diet recommendations for a reduction of saturated fats, cholesterol, and trans acids. Tallow contains a high level of cholesterol (~1000 ppm). Almost half of the fatty acids are saturated and include myristic fatty acid, which has the greatest effect in raising blood plasma cholesterol levels. In addition, tallow contains approximately 5% trans fatty acids, which is characteristic of ruminant digestive systems.124,126 Trans fatty acids originate from the microbial biohydrogenation of polyunsaturated fatty acids in the digestive tract of ruminants and, therefore, occur naturally in ruminant meat and milk fats. The predominate trans fatty acids of biohydrogenation are C-18:1 trans 11 isomer (vaccenic) and C-18:2 cis 9, trans 11 conjugated linolenic fatty acid (rumenic).127 Both tallow and lard are essentially ready for use after rendering, but most processors deodorize meat fats after a clarification procedure. The two main impurities in meat fats are proteins that escaped the rendering process and free fatty acids. It is necessary to remove the proteinaceous materials before deodorization; with steam distillation the proteins turn black and require bleaching for removal. Two processes have been used to remove the proteinaceous materials:
1. Filtration: Diatomaceous earth or bleaching earth is added to the meat fat followed by filtration to remove traces of moisture and impurities. 2. Water washing: Meat fats can be water washed with about 10% water to remove the protein. Water washing is not as widely practiced as filtration for clarification because it requires extra centrifuge capacity, and most meat fats will require bleaching even after water washing.
56
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Caustic refined or neutralized tallow was the frying fat of choice for French-fried potatoes by several fast food restaurants for many years. To produce this product, good-quality fresh tallow was caustic refined, double water washed, and vacuum dried. The neutralized tallow had a 0.05% free fatty acid limit and a characteristic fresh tallow flavor. The sole purpose of the caustic refining was to neutralize the fatty acids. Bleaching and deodorization of this product were avoided to retain the fresh tallow flavor.128 This end-product use was eliminated by dietary cholesterol concerns. 1.24.1 Tallow Physical Properties and Composition Tallow contains very little red or yellow pigments, but can have a high green color caused by chlorophyll. The chlorophyll is easily removed from fresh tallow with activated bleaching earth to achieve a water-white appearance. Typical physical characteristics and compositions for tallow are as follows:8,49,124,129 Tallow Composition and Physical Properties Characteristics
Typical
Range
Specific gravity, 40°C/water at 20°C
—
0.893 to 0.904
Refractive index, 40°C
—
1.448 to 1.460
Iodine value
45
40 to 49
Saponification number
—
190 to 202
Unsaponifiable matter, %
—
<0.8
Titer, °C
—
40 to 49
46.5
45 to 48
Mettler dropping point, °C Solidification point, °C
—
AOM stability, hours
16
—
Oxidative stability index, hours
3.6
—
Fatty acid composition, % C-12:0 Lauric
0.2
<0.2
C-14:0 Myristic
4.0
1.4 to 7.8
C-14:1 Myristoleic
0.5
0.5 to 1.5
C-15:0 Pentadecanoic
1.0
0.5 to 1.0
C-16:0 Palmitic
24.3
17.0 to 37.0
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
2.5
0.7 to 8.8
C-16:2 Hexadecadienoic
—
<1.0
C-17:0 Margaric
2.1
0.5 to 2.0
C-17:1 Margaroleic
1.3
<1.0
C-18:0 Stearic
21.4
6.0 to 40.0
C-18:1 Oleic
33.6
26.0 to 50.0
C-18:1 Vaccenic (geometeric trans)
4.9
3.4 to 6.2
C-18:2 Linoleic
1.6
0.5 to 5.0
C-18:2 (positional trans)
1.1
0.6 to 1.7
Raw Materials
57
Tallow Composition and Physical Properties (Continued) Characteristics
Typical
Range
C-18:2 Rumenic (conjugated trans)
0.9
0.6 to 1.7
C-18:3 Linolenic
0.6
<2.5
C-20:0 Arachidic
0.2
<0.5
C-20:1 Gadoleic
0.1
<0.5
C-20:4 Eicosatetraenoic
—
<0.5
Other fatty acids
0.4
0.3 to 0.6
Triglyceride composition, % SSS Trisaturated
21.5
15 to 28
SUS Disaturated
49.0
46 to 52
SUU Monosaturated
32.5
0 to 64
UUU Triunsaturated
1.0
0 to 2
Crystal habit
β′
Solids fat index at: 10.0°C/50°F
36.0
28.5 to 36.5
21.1°C/70°F
23.5
18.0 to 26.0
26.7°C/80°F
21.0
16.5 to 29.0
33.3°C/92°F
15.0
11.5 to 16.0
37.8°C/100°F
9.5
7.0 to 10.5
40.0°C/104°F
7.0
4.5 to 8.0
Notes: S = saturated, U = unsaturated, AOM = active oxygen method.
A variety of shortenings have been formulated with tallow because of its physical characteristics. Tallow contains high levels of saturated fatty acids, which give it a solid consistency at room temperature. In many cases, vegetable oils are hydrogenated to achieve the same degree of saturation for consistency and functionality that occurs naturally in tallow. The geometric arrangement of the tallow triglycerides is highly asymmetric, which along with a high palmitic fatty acid content promotes crystallization in the β′ form. The β′ crystalline structure, solids content, and plasticity provide a good matrix for rapid incorporation into mixes, as well as entrapment and retention of small air bubbles during and after mixing, therefore, tallow has functionality traits ideally suited for applications requiring lubricity and structure, such as cakes, icings, and pastries. The structural properties of tallow can be used in product blends with vegetable oils for margarine, puff pastry, Danish, and other roll-in applications as well. These blends can provide solids fat index profiles that achieve the roll-in properties, flakiness, and expansion desired.130 Tallow does not contain any natural antioxidants, and the low levels of linolenic and linoleic fatty acids can contribute to flavor reversion unless protected with an antioxidant. Reverted tallow has a somewhat undesirable flavor and odor, like an old beef or mutton roast. The antioxidant systems effective for lard also apply to tallow (i.e., BHA and BHT or TBHQ with a metal chelators, such as citric acid).
58
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
1.25 milk Fat Traditionally, milk fat has always had the highest economic value of any of the milk constituents, thus placing it at an economic disadvantage compared to other edible fats and oils products. Typically, cow’s milk contains 3.7% fat. Butter, a table spread containing at least 80% milk fat, is a water-in-oil emulsion produced from milk or cream. Milk fat is also available in two other forms: anhydrous butterfat and butter oil. Anhydrous butterfat is milk fat separated directly from milk or cream, and butter oil is milk fat made by removing water from butter. The composition of milk fat is somewhat complex. Triglycerides constitute approximately 98% of milk fat, with the remainder being made up of di- and monoglycerides, phospholipids, cerebrosides, cholesterol, vitamins, tocopherols, carotene, and flavor components. Milk fat contains more fatty acids than any other fat of animal or vegetable origin. Cow’s milk fat is now known to contain over 500 different fatty acids. Most of these fatty acids are present at exceedingly low levels, but some of these minor components are very important, such as the lactones, which contribute to the unique flavor. The fatty acid composition of milk fat depends on the diet and breed of the cow — feed has the most influence. A change from winter feeding conditions to summer pasture can increase the proportion of unsaturated fatty acids and decrease the saturated fatty acids; normally oleic (C-18:1) is increased at the expense of butyric (C-4:0) and stearic (C-18:0). Milk fat fatty acid compositions have been further modified by formulating the cow’s feed with high quantities of different fatty acids. Underfeeding has effected a decline in the volatile fatty acids butyric (C-4:0) and caproic (C-6:0), with an increase in oleic (C-18:1) fatty acid. Traditionally, the Jersey breed has a higher volatile fatty acid content than the milk from Holsteins, Ayrshires, or Shorthorns.131 1.25.1 Milk Fat Physical Properties and Composition Milk fat is distinguished from other fats, except the laurics, by the low average molecular weight of its fatty acids, as indicated by a high saponification value and a low refractive index. Butterfat differs from the lauric oils by a high content of steamvolatile short- and medium-chain fatty acids, that is, butyric, caproic, caprylic, and capric. The fatty acid distribution in milk fat triglycerides is not random and the short-chain fatty acids preferentially occupy the sn-3 position. Ruminant milk fat contains relatively low concentrations of polyunsaturated fatty acids as a result of biohydrogenation of dairy lipids in the rumen. The biohydrogenation process also converts 6.8 to 7.5% of the unsaturated fatty acids to the trans configuration — mainly C-16 and C-18 monoene acids.123,134 Conjugated linoleic fatty acid (CLA) isomer cis-9, trans-11 has been associated with beneficial health effects, including cancer protection, heart disease defense, reduction in body fat, enhanced immunity, and increased bone mineralization. The FDA has recognized these health benefits by excluding conjugated linoleic fatty acid from the label requirements for disclosure of trans fatty acid contents in food products.132 The physical properties and composition of milk fat are as follows:8,49,133,134
Raw Materials
59
Milk Fat Composition and Physical Properties Characteristics Specific gravity, 40°C/20°C Refractive index, 60°C
Typical
Range
—
0.907 to 0.912
0.4465
—
34
—
Saponification number
—
210 to 250
Unsaponifiable matter, %
—
<0.4
Iodine value
Titer, °C
34
—
Mettler dropping point, °C
35
28 to 36
Solidification point, °C
—
19.0 to 24.5
AOM stability, hours
42
—
12.7
— 2.8 to 4.0
Oxidative stability index (110°C), hours Fatty acid composition, % C-4:0 Butyric
3.6
C-6:0 Caproic
2.2
1.4 to 3.0
C-8:0 Caprylic
1.2
0.5 to 1.7
C-10:0 Capric
2.5
1.7 to 3.2
C-10:1 Decenoic
—
0.1 to 0.3
C-12:0 Lauric
2.9
2.2 to 4.5
C-12:1 Lauroleic
—
0.1 to 0.6
C-14:0 Myristic
10.8
5.4 to 14.6
C-14:1 Myristoleic
0.8
0.6 to 1.6
C-15:0 Pentadecanoic
2.1
—
C-16:0 Palmitic
26.9
26.0 to 41.0
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
2.0
2.8 to 5.7
C-17:0 Margaric
0.7
—
C-18:0 Stearic
12.1
6.1 to 12.5
C-18:1 Oleic
28.5
18.7 to 33.4
3.2
0.9 to 3.7
t
C-18:2 Linoleic t
0.4
<2.5
C-20:1/C-22:1 t
0.1
0.8 to 3.0
Trans fatty acids, %
7.2
6.8 to 7.5
Crystal habit
β′
C-18:3 Linolenic
t
Solids fat index at: 10.0°C/50°F
33.0
—
21.1°C/70°F
14.0
—
26.7°C/80°F
10.0
—
33.3°C/92°F
3.0
—
40.0°C/104°F
0
—
Notes: S = saturated, U = unsaturated, AOM = active oxygen method, t = including trans fatty acids.
60
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Actual and potential flavors are among the most important attributes of milk fat. In dairy products, such as milk, cream, ice cream, and table spread butter, the aim is to retain the mild delicate flavor associated with the fat of fresh milk; however, in cooking, baking, and many processed food applications, the object is to generate buttery, creamy, cheesy, and caramel-like flavor qualities from the milk fat. This important attribute of milk fats precludes most of the usual fats and oils processing techniques that would substantially change or totally eliminate the unique flavoring components. Food flavor is a complex of at least three factors: aroma, taste, and texture. The fatty acid composition of milk fat provides the melting and solidification or textural characteristics. The aroma and taste of milk fat are diverse. Although present in butterfat in relatively small quantities, aliphatic lactones are responsible for part of the desirable and characteristic flavor of butter. Stored butter experiences a gradual but regular increase in total lactone content for stronger flavors, even under refrigerated storage conditions. Therefore, the volatile fatty acids, C-4 through C-10, and the lactones are considered to be the substances that comprise the pleasant, nonoxidative flavor and odor characteristics of milk fat.131 Because butter is more expensive than most other fats, its use is restricted to those products where the distinctive flavor makes a significant contribution to acceptability or use of the product or has advertising or marketing value. As a raw material, milk fat opportunities are limited for edible fats and oils processors, as most of the processes would destroy or materially change the flavor attributes. The opportunities that have been utilized in the United States are in final blends with margarine and in some cases with other products primarily as a flavorant. A process utilized in Europe and Japan can effect consistency changes in milk fat without damaging the flavor. Unlike most conventional techniques to modify the consistency of a fat, dry fractionation neither destroys the milk fat flavor nor alters the fatty acid profile. The flavor and β′ polymorphic crystal formed are maintained in the fatty stearine and olein fractions with this process. The milk fat stearine fraction has application as a roll-in for puff pastry, Danish pastry, croissants, and other baked products as well as coating products. The olein fractions have been used in cookies and dairy products and have been blended with other edible oil products to prepare a soft tub-type table spread.135 1.26 MENHADEN OIL Fish oil was not considered an edible oil in the United States until 1989 when the FDA concluded that fully and partially hydrogenated menhaden oil was a safe ingredient for human consumption and granted it GRAS (generally recognized as safe) status.136 In 1990, the FDA proposed an amendment, based on an industry petition, to the standard of identity for margarine to permit the use of marine oils. On July 15, 1994, the phrase “or any form of oil from a marine species that has been affirmed as GRAS or listed as a food additive for this use” was added to 21 CFR Part 166.110,137 the margarine standard of identity. On June 5, 1997, the FDA published the final
Raw Materials
61
rule for refined menhaden oil affirming GRAS status for liquid menhaden fish oil. This approval made it possible to fortify foods with refined menhaden oil to achieve levels of omega-3 fatty acids similar to seafood products. However, 3 grams/person/ day limitation of fish oil omega-3 fatty acids was imposed by the FDA as a safeguard against possible effects of these fatty acids on increased bleeding time, glycemic control for noninsulin-dependent diabetics, and increased LDL cholesterol levels. Therefore, menhaden oil cannot be used in combination with any other oils that are significant sources of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic fatty acids. The maximum level of use in food categories varies with the serving sizes to conform to the 3-gram limit of long-chain essential fatty acids, for example, the maximum level in fats and oils ingredients is 12% and, for baked goods and mixes, it is 5%.136 Menhaden oil is a refined marine oil that is derived from menhaden fish of the genies Brevoortia. Menhaden is a pelagic-type fish specifically pursued for reduction to meal and oil. Atlantic menhaden are members of the worldwide family Clupeidae, one of the most important families both economically and ecologically. Clupeids are characteristically very numerous and form large, dense schools. Atlantic menhaden are euryhaline species that inhabit near shore and inland tidal waters from Florida to Nova Scotia, Canada. Many of the species are filter feeders, being either primary consumers, feeding on phytoplankton, or secondary consumers, feeding on zooplankton, or both. Plankton are floating or weakly swimming minute animal and plant life (algae). Menhaden reduction plants (through a wet-rendering process composed of cooking, pressing, drying, separating, and evaporating) produce meal, oil, and solubles from fresh menhaden fish.138 Cooking coagulates the fish protein so that the liquid and solids can be mechanically separated. The liquid fraction is screened to remove particles of solid material and then certrifuged to separate as much oil as possible from the aqueous phase. The separated oil is washed and centrifuged again to produce crude fish oil. Crude menhaden oil contains nontriglyceride materials, such as waxes, moisture, insoluble impurities, free fatty acids, trace metals, sulfur, halogens, nitrogen compounds, pigments, and sterols. Processing used to remove these undesirable substances usually include degumming to remove phosphatides and proteinaceous materials; alkali refining to remove free fatty acids and some pigments; bleaching to remove pigments, oxidation products, trace metals, and soaps; and deodorization to achieve a bland flavor. In addition, most menhaden oils are winterized to remove the low melting triglycerides for clarity at low temperatures.139 The typical characteristics of menhaden oil are as follows:8,49,140-143 Menhaden Oil Composition and Physical Properties Characteristics
Typical
Range
Specific gravity, 60°C
0.903
—
Refractive index, 60°C
1.4845
—
Iodine value
159
150 to 165
Saponification number
196
192 to 199
Unsaponifiable matter, %
1.0
—
62
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Menhaden Oil Composition and Physical Properties (Continued) Characteristics
Typical
Range
Titer, °C
32
—
Slip melting point, °C
24
22 to 28
none
— 0.5 to 0.7
Cold test, hours Trace metals, ppm Iron
—
Copper
—
<0.3
Phosphorus
—
5 to 100
Cholesterol, %
—
0.5 to 1.5
C-14:0 Myristic
9.3
7.2 to 12.1
C-14:1 Myristoleic
0.7
—
C-15:0 Pentadecanoic
1.0
0.4 to 2.3
C-16:0 Palmitic
17.1
15.3 to 25.6
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
12.5
9.3 to 15.8
C-16:2 Hexadecadienoic
1.7
0.3 to 2.8
C-16:3 Hexadecatrienoic
1.7
0.9 to 3.5
C-16:4 Hexadecatetraenoic
1.8
0.5 to 2.8
C-17:0 Margaric
0.9
0.2 to 3.0
C-18:0 Stearic
2.8
2.5 to 4.1
C-18:1 Oleic
11.4
8.3 to 13.8
C-18:2 Linoleic
1.5
0.7 to 2.8
C-18:3 Linolenic
1.6
0.8 to 2.3
C-18:4 Stearidonic
3.4
1.7 to 4.0
C-20:0 Arachidic
0.2
0.1 to 0.6
C-20:1 Gadoleic
1.6
—
Fatty acid composition, %
C-20:4 Arachidonic
2.0
1.5 to 2.7
C-20:5 EPA
15.5
11.1 to 16.3
C-22:1 Erucic
1.4
0.1 to 1.4
C-22:5 Clupanodonic
2.4
1.3 to 3.8
C-22:6 DHA
9.1
4.6 to 13.8
Unidentified
2.4
—
Note: ppm = parts per million.
Menhaden oil differs from vegetable oils and animal fats by its high proportion of polyunsaturated fatty acids, especially the long-chain omega-3 fatty acids. EPA and DHA are the major source of omega-3 fatty acids to comprise 30% or more of the oil. The ratio of omega-3 to omega-6 fatty acids in menhaden oil approaches 10:1, a reverse of the omega-6 to omega-3 ratios of soybean oil and canola oil, 7:1 and
Raw Materials
63
2.5:1, respectively. The composition of fish oils can vary within a species by season, area caught, what the fish were eating, and sexual maturity and age of the fish. Fish oils are oxidized via the same general mechanism that plant oils follow. The rate of oxidation was found directly proportional to the number of double bonds present, which was independent of chain length. The highly unsaturated fatty acid composition renders fish oils extremely susceptible to oxidation and rapid degradation, especially during processes that involve thermal treatment without the benefit of protection from an inert gas or a vacuum to exclude contact with oxygen. An artificial antioxidant effective in fish oils is TBHQ (tertiary butylhydroquinone). Tocopherols and rosemary have also been utilized when a natural antioxidant is required. Blending with high-oleic fatty acid oils has shown a marked effect at lowering the rate of oxidation.144 The high content of EPA and DHA fatty acids in menhaden oil are principally located in the sn-2 location of triglycerides. It has been reported that EPA and DHA in the sn-2 position are more readily absorbed than when located at the sn-1 and sn-3 positions or randomized.145 However, it was also found that unsaturated fatty acids located at the sn-2 location of the glycerol moiety are the most prone to oxidation.146 Even though menhaden oil is composed of almost 70% unsaturates, it still is not a natural salad oil, it will cloud at refrigerator temperatures. It must be winterized or fractionated to separate a liquid olein fraction that will withstand cooler temperatures without clouding. Characteristics of crude menhaden oil are compared to olein and stearine fractions obtained by a winterization process below: Comparison of Menhaden Oil Fractions Characteristics
Crude Oil
Olein
Stearine
Fatty acid composition, % C-14:0 Myristic
9
8
11
C-16:0 Palmitic
21
18
31
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
12
12
10
C-18:0 Stearic
3
3
5
C-18:1 Linoleic
12
12
10
C-20:1 Gadoleic
2
2
2
C-20:5 EPA
14
15
11
C-22:1 Erucic
1
1
1
C-22:5 Clupanodonic
2
2
1
C-22:6 DHA
10
11
7
165 to 185
175 to 200
120 to 150
none
2
none
Iodine value range Cold test, hours
The stearine fraction has physical properties like partially hydrogenated menhaden oil, but it still contains substantial amounts of omega-3 fatty acids. The melting characteristics are reported to be similar to that of lard.140
64
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
1.27 SINGLE CELL OILS Fish do not produce omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids; they are biosynthesized by single-cell microbes (microalgae, select bacteria, and other microheterotrops) and passed up the food chain. These groups of microbes contain the enzymes needed to make large amounts of omega-3 and omega-6 longchain polyunsaturated fatty acid oils, particularly EPA, DHA, and arachidonic fatty acids. Various species of yeasts, fungi, and algae are able to produce high levels of the nutritionally important essential fatty acids.147 Single cell oils can be grown in fermenters on an organic carbon source and, therefore, are a highly attractive, renewable, and contaminant-free source of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. Pursuit of single cell oil technology is necessary because it is predicted that global fish stocks will not meet human nutritional needs in the future. An analysis of world fisheries concluded that all of the species currently fished will collapse by 2048 and are unlikely to recover.148 1.27.1 Microalgae Oils Marine microalgae represent the primary food source of all sea life, including fish that derive most of their long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids from this plant life. Fish raised in captivity and/or fresh water with an algae-free diet have very little EPA (C-20:5) and DHA (C-22:6) fatty acids.149 Fermentation technology has been developed for the production of omega-3 fatty acids in whole-cell algal biomass. This technology includes isolating strains of algae that meet the essential fatty acids objectives, cultivating, harvesting, and processing the DHA fatty acid-rich oil. The oils are extracted from the cultivated microalgae by centrifugation, processed immediately or spray dried. The DHA rich oil is extracted with a suitable solvent and desolventized under vacuum and fractionated to remove the saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids. The DHA fraction is refined, bleached, and deodorized to obtain clear, odorless oil. This oil is typically blended with high-oleic oil to a 40% minimum DHA content for oxidative stability. Algae oil, rich in DHA fatty acid, has been self-affirmed as GRAS.150 Microbial DHA fatty acid production has been an important research area because of both its function in the human body and the difficulty of its purification from fish oil. The fatty acid composition of algae oil and its DHA concentrate obtained by urea complexation are tabulated below:151 Algal Oil Fatty Acid Composition Fatty Acid, %
Algal Oil
DHA Concentrate
C-10:0 Capric
0.58 ± 0.06
0.47 ± 0.04
C-12:0 Lauric
1.12 ± 0.05
0.51 ± 0.02
C-14:0 Myristic
14.92 ± 0.07
0.13 ± 0.02
C-14:1 Myristoleic
0.20 ± 0.03
0.16 ± 0.01
C-16:0 Palmitic
9.05 ± 0.12
ND
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
2.20 ± 0.08
0.25 ± 0.01
Raw Materials
65
Algal Oil Fatty Acid Composition (Continued) Characteristics
Typical
C-18:0 Stearic C-18:1 Oleic
Range
0.20 ± 0.01
ND
18.95 ± 0.32
0.22 ± 0.01
C-18:2 Linoleic
1.01 ± 0.02
0.65 ± 0.03
C-22:5 Clupanodonic
0.51 ± 0.05
0.41 to 0.01
C-22:6 DHA
47.42 ± 0.15
97.1 ± 0.02
Iodine value, calculated
234.0 ± 1.3
436.8 ± 0.3
Note: ND = none detected.
1.27.2 Fungal Oil It has been recognized for many years that the distribution of fatty acid isomers varies in fungi according to phylogenetic relationships. Fungal species Mortierella alpina (Peyronel IS-4) is the source of omega-6 arachidonic (ARA) fatty acid (C-20:4); fungal species Mortierella alpina (20-17) produce omega-3 eicosapentaenoic (EPA) fatty acid (C-20:5); and fungal species Mucor mucedo (CCF-1384) is a producer of biologically active omega-6 γ-linolenic (GLA) fatty acid (C-18:3). The fatty acid composition of δ-linolenic fungal fatty acid oil has a resemblance to human breast milk. The fungal cultures are grown and fermented with specific conditions for each long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid to produce a biomass that is filtered and dried before oils rich in the essential fatty acids are extracted, usually with a solvent such as hexane. The extracted fungal oil is relatively stable, probably due to the presence of endogenous antioxidants. Unfortunately, these minor components are lost in the subsequent processing steps: refining, bleaching, and deodorization. Most processed fungal oils are protected by an added antioxidant system usually containing mixed tocopherols and ascorbyl palmitate.152 Examples of potential fungal oils production are shown below:153-155 Fungal Oils Fatty Acid Composition Fungal Species Major Fatty Acid Fatty acid composition, % C-14:0 Myristic C-16:0 Palmitic C-16:1 Palmitoleic C-18:0 Stearic C-18:1 Oleic C-18:2 Linoleic C-18:3 α-Linolenic C-18:3 γ-Linolenic C-20:2 Eicosadienoic
Mucor mucedo CCF-1384 γ-linolenic
Mortierella alpina IS-4 Arachidonic
Mortierella alpina 20-17 EPA
2.3
0.2
–
24.3 0.2 35.9 22.7 6.0 – 8.6 –
13.4 – 6.8 11.3 13.3 3.6 – 0.6
6.0 – 5.3 6.2 3.0 3.5 – –
66
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Fungal Oils Fatty Acid Composition Fungal Species
Mucor mucedo CCF-1384 γ-linolenic
Mortierella alpina IS-4 Arachidonic
Mortierella alpina 20-17 EPA
C-20:3 Eicosatrienoic C-20:4 Arachidonic C-20:5 EPA
– – –
3.2 36.2 –
– 60.0 13.5
C-24:0 Lignoceric Other fatty acids
– –
7.2 4.2
– 2.5
166.7
266.2
Major Fatty Acid
Iodine value, calculated
51.0
References
1. O’Brien, R.D., Fats and oils: An overview, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E., and Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 1–6. 2. Gunstone, F., Yields of oilseeds and of oils and fats, INFORM 12, 1093, 2001. 3. Ash, M. and Dohlman, E., Oil Crops Situation and Outlook Yearbook, USDA, Washington, D.C., May 2007, pp. 61, 69, 82. 4. Markey, K.S., Historical and general, in Fatty Acids, 2nd ed., Markey, K.S., Ed., Interscience Publishers, New York, 1960, pp. 2–3. 5. USDA, Fats and Oils Situation, U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C., 1985, p. 8. 6. USDA, Fats and Oils Situation, U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C., 1977, p. 14. 7. Wan, P.J., Properties of fats and oils, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E., and Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 21–24. 8. Sonntag, N.O.V., Structure and composition of fats and oils, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 1, 4th ed., Swern, D., Ed., Wiley–Interscience, New York, 1979, pp. 3–4, 21, 292–317, 319, 342–368, 374–387, 389–403. 9. Wakins, C., Cholesterol: The molecular Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, INFORM, 13, 886–888, 2002. 10. Dijkstra, A.J., Degumming, refining, washing and drying of fats and oils, in Processing of the World Conference on Oilseed Technology and Utilization, Applewhite, T.H., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1993, pp. 138–151. 11. Firestone, D., Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Oils, Fats, and Waxes, AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1999, pp. 29, 32, 67, 69, 71, 75, 85, 88, 95, 99, 121, 131, 144. 12. Shahidi, F. and Shukla, V.K.S., Nontriacylglycerol constituents of fats, oils, INFORM, 7, 1227–1232, 1996. 13. White, P.J., Flavor quality of fats and oils, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.A., and Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 354–357. 14. Bagge, C., Techniques for enhancing quality in edible oil processing, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed Technology and Utilization, Applewhite, T.H., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1993, p. 198.
Raw Materials
67
15. Harper, T., Recent developments in chemical and physical refining, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed Processing and Utilization, Wilson, R.F., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2001, p. 25. 16. Dunford, N.T., Health benefits and processing of lipid-based nutritionals, Food Technol., 55, 41–42, 2001. 17. Anon., Squalene, from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, November, 2006, p.1. 18. Japan Health Products, What is Squalene?
[email protected], 2005, pp. 1–2. 19. Boskou, D., Olive oil, in Vegetable Oils in Food Technology, Gunstone, F.D., Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p. 250, 2002. 20. Smith, K.J., Polen, P.B., DeVries, D.M., and Coon, F.B., Removal of chlorinated pesticides from crude vegetable oils by simulated commercial processing procedures, JAOCS, 45, 866–869, 1968. 21. ISEO Technical Committee, Food Fats and Oils, 9th ed., Institute of Shortening and Edible Oils, Columbia, MD, pp. 1–21, 2006. 22. Hicks, K.B. and Moreau, R.A., Phytosterols and phytostanols: Functional food cholesterol busters, Food Technol., 55, 63–67, 2001. 23. Welch, R., FDA Talk Paper, Washington, D.C., September 5, 2000, pp. 1–2. 24. Klaharst, S.J., Phytosterols: Cholesterol’s stand-ins, in Food Product Design, Weeks Publishing Co., Northbrook, IL, March 2004, pp. 19–20. 25. Vander Jagt, D.L., Gossypol studied as anti-viral agent, INFORM, 4, 598, 1993. 26. Gupta, M.K., Processing to improve soybean oil quality, INFORM, 4, 1267–1272, 1993. 27. Mounts, T.L., Evans, C.D., Dutton, H.J., and Cowan, J.C., Some radiochemical experiments on minor constituents in soybean oil, JAOCS, 46, 482–484, 1969. 28. Flider, F.J. and Orthoefer, F.T., Metals in soybean oil, JAOCS, 58, 270–272, 1981. 29. Del Vecchio, A.J., High-laurate canola, INFORM, 7, 230–243, 1996. 30. Anon., High-laurate canola oil sold as boiler fuel, INFORM, 12, 1019, 2001. 31. Anon., Soybean industry provides more healthful oils, INFORM, 18, 317, 2007. 32. Anon., DHA in land-plant seed oil a first, INFORM, 16, 412, 2005. 33. Anon., Arcadia develops GLA enriched safflower, INFORM, 17, 369, 2006. 34. Turner, J., Nothing “fishy” about Omega-3s, in Food Product Design, Weeks Publishing Company, Phoenix, AZ, April 2006, pp. 57–69. 35. Wolf, W.J. and Cowan, J.C., Introduction, in Soybeans as a Food Source, CRC Press, Cleveland, OH, 1971, pp. 9–13. 36. Smith, A.K. and Circle, S.J., Historical background, in Soybean’s Chemistry and Technology, vol. 1, AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1972, pp. 4–6. 37. Dutton, H.J., History of the development of soy oil for edible uses, JAOCS, 58, 234, 1981. 38. Erickson, D.R., Soybeanoil: Update on number one, JAOCS, 60, 356, 1983. 39. Johnson, L., Oil recovery from soybeans, in Soybeans, Chemistry, Production, Processing and Utilization, AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2008, p. 351. 40. Erickson, D.R., Bleaching/adsorption treatment, in Practical Handbook of Soybean Processing and Utilization, AOCS Press, Champaign, IL and United Soybean Board, St. Louis, MO, 1995, pp. 203–206. 41. Hastert, R.C., Adsorptive treatment of edible oils, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology P.J. Wan, Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1991, pp. 96–100. 42. Carlson, K., Recent developments and trends in processing of fats and oils, INFORM, 17, 671–674, 2006. 43. Dutton, H.J. et al., The flavor problem of soybean oil. IV. Structure of compounds counteracting the efect of prooxidant metals, JAOCS, 25, 385–388, 1948.
68
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
44. O’Brien, R.D., Soybean oil modification, in Soybeans, Chemistry, Production, Processing and Utilization, AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2008, p. 413. 45. O’Brien, R.D., Formulation-single feedstock situation, in Hydrogenation Proceedings of an AOCS Colloquium, Hastert, R., Ed., American Oil Chemistry Society, Champaign, IL, 1987, p. 153. 46. Weiss, T.J., Commercial oil dources, in Food Oils and Their Uses, 2nd ed., AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1983, pp. 36–40, 45–46. 47. List, G.R., Mounts, T.L., Orthoefer, F., and Neff, W.E., Potential margarine oils from genetically modified soybeans, JAOCS, 73, 729–732, 1996. 48. Gillatt, P., Codex alimentarius’ role in world trade, INFORM, 5, 985, 1994. 49. Capital City Products Co., Typical Fatty Acid Composition of Selected Edible Fats and Oils, Capital City Products Company, Columbus, OH, 1989. 50. Dzisak, D., New oils reduce saturated and trans fats in processed foods, Cereal Foods World, 49, 332, 2004. 51. Mensink, R.P., Zock, P.L., Kester, A.D.M., Katan, M.B., Effects of dietary fatty acids and carbohydrates on the ration of serum total to HDL cholesterol and on serum lipids and apolipoproteins: A meta-analysis of 60 controlled trials, Am. J. C. Nutr. 77, 1146–1155, 2003. 52. Liu, K., Modifying soybean through plant breeding and genetic engineering, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed Processing and Utilization, Wilson, R.F., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2001, pp. 84–89. 53. Liu, K., Soy oil modification: Products, applications, INFORM, 10, 868, 1999. 54. Jones, L.A. and King, C.C., Cottonseed Oil, National Cottonseed Products Association, Inc., and The Cotton Foundation, Memphis, TN, 1990, pp. 5–7. 55. Jones, L.A. and King, C.C., Cottonseed, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 5th ed., vol. 2, Hui, Y.H., Ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996, pp. 200–202. 56. O’Brien, R.D., Cottonseed oil, in Vegetable Oils in Food Technology, Gunstone, F., Ed., Blackwell Publishing, Sheffield, U.K., 2002, pp. 204–205. 57. Anon., World’s no. 3 oilseed yields diverse products, INFORM, 11, 820, 2000. 58. Chapman, K.D. et al., Transgenic cotton plants with increased seed oleic acid content, JAOCS, 78, 941, 2001. 59. Anon., CSIRD creates new cottonseed, INFORM, 12, 839, 2001. 60. Woodroof, J.G., Peanuts: Production, Processing, Products, AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1973, pp. 1–8, 247–257. 61. Haumann, B.F., Peanuts find niche in healthy diet, INFORM, 9, 746–752, 1998. 62. Mattson, F.H. and Grundy, S.M., Comparison of effects of dietary saturated, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids on plasma lipids and lipoproteins in man, J. Lipid Res., 26, 194–202, 1985. 63. Grundy, S.M., Comparison of monounsaturated fatty acids and carbohydrates for lowering plasma cholesterol, N. Engl. J. Med., 314, p. 745, 1986. 64. Krishmamurthy, R.G. and Witte, V.C., Cooking oils, salad oils, and oil-based fressings, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 3, 5th ed., Hui, Y.H., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996, p. 195. 65. Langstraat, A., Characteristics and composition of vegetable oil-bearing materials, JAOCS, 53, 242–244, 1976. 66. Branscomb, L. and Young, C., Peanut Oil, Georgia Agricultural Commodity Commission for Peanuts, Tifton, GA, 1972. 67. Sanders, T.H., Groundnut (peanut) oil, in Vegetable Oils in Food Technology, Gunstone, F.D., Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2002, p. 236. 68. Haumann, B.F., Corn research looks at changing oil content, INFORM, 7, 576, 1996.
Raw Materials
69
69. Lisk, G., Steidley K.R., and Neff, W.E., Commercial spreads formulation, structure and properties, INFORM, 11, 982, 2000. 70. Strecker, L.R. et al., Corn oil, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 2, 5th ed., Hui, Y.H., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996, pp. 128–131. 71. Leibovitz, Z. and Ruckenstein, C., Our experiences in processing maize (corn) germ oil, JAOCS, 60, 395, 1983. 72. Haumann, B.F., Corn research looks at changing oil content, INFORM, 7, 576, 1996. 73. Anon., Sunflower Handbook, The National Sunflower Association, Bismark, ND, 1991, pp. 4–9, 17–21. 74. Gunstone, F., Sunflower seed and its products, INFORM, 13, 159, 2002. 75. Ackman, R.G., Identity characteristics for edible oils — origin, current usefulness, and possible future directions, INFORM, 12, 998, 2001. 76. Morrison, W.H., Effects of refining and bleaching on oxidation stability of sunflower oil, JAOCS, 52, 522, 1975. 77. Gupta, M.K., NuSun oil: A healthy nontransgenic sunflower oil, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed Processing and Utilization, Wilson, R.F., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2001, pp. 80–83. 78. Kleingartner, L., Sunflower grows with NSA’s leadership, INFORM, 15, 748, 2004. 79. Daun, J.K. and Ackman, R.G., Identity of fats and oils, INFORM, 12, 1108, 2001. 80. Purdy, R.H., Oxidative stability of high oleic sunflower and safflower oils, JAOCS, 62, 523, 1985. 81. National Institute of Oilseed Products Trading Rules 1994–1995, NIOP, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 85–86, 95–97. 82. Purdy, R.H. et al., Safflower, its development and utilization, JAOCS, 36, 26, 1959. 83. Kneeland, J.A., The status of safflower, JAOCS, 43, 403, 1966. 84. Terrones, A., Safflower: A specialty oil in the world market, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed Processing and Utilization, Wilson, R.F., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2001, pp. 145–150. 85. Blum, J.E., The role of safflower oil in edible oil applications, JAOCS, 43, 416, 1966. 86. Smith, J.R., Safflower: Due for a rebound? JAOCS, 62, 1286, 1985. 87. Knowles, P.F., The plant geneticist’s contribution toward changing lipid and amino acid composition of safflower, JAOCS, 49, 27, 1972. 88. Resken, J., Siebrecht, J., and Hazebroek, J., Triacylglycerol composition and structure in genetically modified sunflower and soybean oils, JAOCS, 74, 989–997, 1997. 89. Fuller, G. et al., Evaluation of oleic safflower in frying of potato chips, J. Food Sci., 36, 43, 1971. 90. Fuller, G. et al., High oleic acid safflower oil: A new stable edible oil, JAOCS, 43, 477, 1966. 91. Friedt, W., Lecband, G., and Frauen, M., NAPUS 2000, Research for an overall improvement of rapeseed, INFORM, 15, 295–297, 2004. 92. Gunstone, F., Rapeseed (canola) oil now no. 3 in world, INFORM, 12, 985, 2001. 93. Vaisey-Genser, M. et al., Canola Oil Properties and Performance, Harris, D.F.G., Ed., Canola Council, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 1987, pp. 1–3, 12. 94. Knehr, E., Canola … Good for every body, Food Prod. Design Suppl., April 2006. 95. Mag, T.K., Canola oil processing in Canada, JAOCS, 60, 380, 1983. 96. Botha, I., Mailer, R., and Robards, K., Evaluation of the role of saturated fatty acids in sedimenting canola oils, JAOCS, 77, 429, 2000. 97. Botha, I. and Mailer, R.J., Evaluation of cold-test methods for screening cloudy canola oils, JAOCS, 78, 395399, 2001.
70
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
98. Firestone, D., Fedeli, E., and Emmons, E.W., Olive oil, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 5th ed., vol. 2, Hui, Y.H., Ed., 1996, pp. 241–250. 99. Vlahov, G., C NMR determination of olive oil adulteration by hazelnut oil, INFORM, 17, 535, 2006. 100. Kiritsakis, A.K., Virgin olive oil composition and its effect on human health, INFORM, 13, 237, 2002. 101. Anon., Olive oil heat effect located, INFORM, 17, 159, 2006. 102. Ninfali, P., et al., Antioxidant capacity of extra virgin olive oils, JAOCS, 78, 243–247, 2001. 103. Kiritsakkis, A.K., Effect of selected storage conditions and packaging materials on olive oil quality, JAOCS, 61, 1868, 1984. 104. Gunstone, F., Palm oil supplying much of world demand for fats and oils, INFORM, 12, 141, 2001. 105. Tang, T.S. and HoOh, F.C., Characteristics and properties of Malaysian palm-kernelbased specialty fats, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Lauric Oils: Sources, Processing, and Applications, Applewhite, T.H., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1994, pp. 84–97. 106. Ariffin, A. et al., Selected Readings on Palm Oil and Its Uses, Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1994, pp. 12, 20, 24–47, 61–66, 73–74. 107. Berger, K.G., Uses of palm oil in the food industry, Chem. Ind., 910, 1975. 108. Lin, S.W., Palm oil in vegetable oils, in Vegetable Oils in Food Technology Composition, Properties and Uses, Gunstone, F.D., Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2002, p. 62. 109. Palmer, S., A new current for tropical oils, in Food Product Design, Weeks Publishing Co., Northbrook, IL, pp. 87–91, May 2006. 110. Duns, M.L., Palm oil in margarines and shortenings, JAOCS, 62, 409, 1985. 111. Pantzaris, T.P.V., Pocketbook of Palm Oil Uses, The Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1988, pp. 9–14. 112. Sundram, K., Gapor, T.A., and Baisron, Y., Palm tocotrienols: New antioxidants for the new millennium, INFORM, 13, 634–640, 2002. 113. Deffense, E., Fractionation of palm oil, JAOCS, 62, 376, 1985. 114. Jalani, B.S. et al., Improvement of palm oil through breeding and biotechnology, JAOCS, 74, 1451, 1997. 115. Langstraat, A., Characteristics and composition of vegetable oil-bearing materials, JAOCS, 53, 242, 1976. 116. Woodroof, J.G., Coconuts: Production, Processing, Products, The AVI Publishing Co., Inc., Westport, CT, 1970, pp. 43–48. 117. Pantzaris, T.P. and Basiron, Y., The lauric (coconut and palm kernel) oils, in Vegetable Oils in Food Technology, Gunstone, F.D., Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2002, pp. 157–202. 118. Tang, T.S. and Teoh, P.K., Palm kernel oil extraction: The Malaysian experience, JAOCS, 62, 254, 1985. 119. Pantzaris, T.P. and Ahmad, M.J., Techno-economic aspects of palm kernel oil, INFORM, 12, 69–80, 2001. 120. Chong, C.L. and Sien, W.L., Chemical and physical properties of palm kernel oil, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Lauric Oils: Sources, Processing, and Applications, Applewhite, T.H., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1994, pp. 79–83. 121. Young, F.V.K., Palm kernel and coconut oils: Analytical characteristics, process technology and uses, JAOCS, 60, 374, 1983.
Raw Materials
71
122. Traitler, H. and Dieffenbacher, A., Palm oil and palm kernel oil in food products, JAOCS, 62, 420, 1985. 123. Swern, D., Plastic shortening agents, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1964, pp. 189, 282–283. 124. Love, J.A., Animal fats, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 1, 5th ed., Hui, Y.H., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996, pp. 4–5. 125. Sonntag, N.O.V., Fat splitting, esterification, and interesterification, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 2, 4th ed., Swern, D., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982, p. 159. 126. Gunstone, F., Animal fats: Tallow, lard, and butter, INFORM, 13, 485, 2002. 127. Scheider, M.R.L., About the trans-(hi)story, INFORM, 18, 133, 2007. 128. Latondress, E.G., Refining, bleaching, and hydrogenating meat fats, JAOCS, 62, 812, 1985. 129. Bayard, C.C. and Wolff, R.L., Analysis of trans- 18:1 isomer content and profile in edible refined beef tallow, JAOCS, 73, 531–533, 1996. 130. Kincs, F.R., Meat fat formulation, JAOCS, 62, 815–818, 1985. 131. Henderson, J.L., Composition, physical and chemical properties of milk, in The FluidMilk Industry, 3rd ed., AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1971, pp. 29–34. 132. Crandall, L., Mother Nature’s nearly perfect food, INFORM, 17, 276–277, 2006. 133. Hettinga, D., Butter, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 3, 5th ed., Hui, Y.H., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996, pp. 2–13. 134. Mossoba, M.M., et al., Application of standard addition to eliminate conjugated linoleic acid and other interferences in the determination of total trans fatty acids in selected food products by infrared spectroscopy, JAOCS, 78, 631–624, 2001. 135. Deffense, E., Multi-step butteroil fractionation and spreadable butter, Fat Sci. Technol., 502, 1987. 136. 21CFR 184.1472, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Volume 3, Part 184 – Direct Food Substances Affirmed as Generally Recognized As Safe, Washington, D.C., Government Printing Office, Revised April 1, 2005. 137. CFR 166.110, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Volume 2, Part 166 – Margarine, Washington, D.C., Government Printing Office, Revised April 1, 2006. 138. Menhaden Resource Council, http://www.menhaden.org/biology.htm and http://www. menhaden.org/biology.htm, 2002–2006. 139. Bimbo, A.P., and Crowther, J.B., Marine oils: fishing for industrial uses, INFORM, 3, 988-1001, 1992. 140. Bimbo, A.P., Menhaden oil: the GRAS petition from hell, INFORM, 8, 1069–1074, 1997. 141. Pigott, G.M., Marine oils, Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 5th ed., Y.H. Hui, Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996, pp. 225–254. 142. Bimbo, A.P., Guidelines for characterizing food-grade fish oil, INFORM, 9, 473–481, 1998. 143. Ashman, R.G., Official methods and recommendations: The need for change, INFORM, 11, 195, 2000. 144. Dahl, S. and Malcata, F.X., Characterization of forced oxidation of sardine oil: Physicochemical data and mathematical modeling, JAOCS, 76, 633–641, 1999. 145. Xu, X., Formuso, L.B., and Akoh, C.C., Modification of menhaden oil by enzymatic acidolysis to produce structured lipids: Optimization by response surface design in a packed bed reactor, JAOCS, 77, 171–176, 2000.
72
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
146. Medina, I., Sacchi, R., Giudicianni, I., and Aubourg, S., Oxidation in fish lipids during thermal stress as studied by C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, JAOCS, 75, 147-154, 1998. 147. Nicholas, P.D., Blackburn, S., and Green, A., Omega-3 oils down under — An update, INFORM, 15, 383–385, 2004. 148. Harvey, F., Scientist warns of fish stock collapse, in Financial Times, November 3, 2006. 149. Kyle, D.J., et al., Bioproduction of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) by microalgae, in Industrial Applications of Single Cell Oils, Kyle, D.J. and Rathledge, C., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1992, pp. 275–290. 150. Kyle, D.J., Production and use of single cell oil, which is highly enriched in docosahexaenoic acid, Lipid Technol., 8, 107–110, 1996. 151. Senanayake, S.P.J.N. and Shahidi, F., Enzymatic Incorporation of docosahexaenoic acid and borage oil, JAOCS, 76, 1011, 199. 152. Streekstra, H., Fungal production of arachidic acid-containing oil on an industrial scale, INFORM, 15, 20–21, 2004. 153. Shimizu, S., Kawashima, H., Shinmen, Y., and Akimoto, K., Production of eicosapentaenoic acid by Mortierella fungi, JAOCS, 65, 1455–1459, 1988. 154. Certik, M., Andrase, P. and Sajbidor, J., Effect of extraction methods on lipid yield and fatty acid composition of lipid classes containing gamma-linolenic acid extracted from fungi, JAOCS, 73, 357–365, 1996. 155. Hiroshi, K., et al., Production of 8, 11, 14, 17 – cis –eicosatetraenoic acid (20:4 omega3) by a delta 5 and delta 12 desaturase-defective mutant of an arachidonic acid-producing fungus Mortierella alpina IS-4, JAOCS, 75, 1495–1500, 1998.
Chapter 2
Fats and Oils Processing
2.1 INTRODUCTION The crude fats and oils recovered from oilseeds, fruits, nuts, and animal tissues can vary from pleasant-smelling products that contain few impurities to quite offensive-smelling, highly impure materials. Only a few of the crude fats and oils are suitable for edible purposes until they have been processed in some manner. Fortunately, researchers have developed processes for changing fats and oils to make them increasingly more useful to the food industry. Processing techniques allow us to refine them, make them flavorless and odorless, change the color, harden them, soften them, make them melt more slowly or more rapidly, change the crystal habit, rearrange their molecular structure, and literally take them apart and put them back together again to suit our requirements of the moment. Advances in lipid processing technology during the past century have resulted in dramatic increases in the consumption of edible fats and oils. Innovations, such as deodorization, hydrogenation, fractionation, and interesterification, along with improvements in other processes, have allowed the production of products that can satisfy demanding functional and nutritional requirements. Throughout the world, processing of fats and oils practically always includes some type of purification to remove impurities, such as gums, free fatty acid (FFA), pigments, metal complexes, and other undesirable materials. The choice of processing equipment and techniques can depend on (1) source oils handled, (2) quality of raw materials, (3) available manpower, (4) maintenance capabilities, (5) daily processed oil requirements, (6) available financial resources, (7) proximity of crude fats and oils, (8) product marketing philosophy, (9) governmental regulations, and (10) a number of other considerations. Two general product marketing philosophies practiced in the United States are crusher/refiner and value-added. The crusher/ refiner plant usually concentrates on a limited number of vegetable oils, which are most likely extracted from the oilseed at the same facility. These plants are usually equipped with continuous, automatic, high-volume systems. The value-added
73
74
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
processor usually processes fats and oils from several different sources into a wide range of specialty or tailor-made finished products. The value-added varied and specialized product mix mandates batch or semicontinuous systems with slower throughputs and requiring more manpower. Fats and oils extraction and processing consists of a series of unit processes in which both physical and chemical changes are made to the raw materials. Figure 2.1 diagrams the typical flow for fats and oils processing in the United States. Changes in the food industry requirements have affected how these raw materials are processed to provide fats and oils products with the functionality required for new and improved prepared foods. Extraction and processing changes have also been motivated by needs of the industry to (1) improve product quality, (2) improve process efficiencies, (3) reduce capital expenses, (4) solve or eliminate environmental problems, and (5) satisfy nutritional requirements. Consideration of the properties of the raw materials, measurement methods, and characteristics of each process or operation is required for process and product control.
2.2 FATS AND OILS RECOVERY Edible fats and oils have been separated from animal tissues, oilseeds, and oil-bearing fruits for thousands of years. The purpose of all fats and oils recovery processes is to obtain triglycerides in high yield and purity and to produce coproducts of maximum value. The oilseeds are processed by one of three types of processes: (1) expeller or screw press extraction, (2) prepress solvent extraction, and (3) expander–solvent extraction. The preferred oilseed extraction process depends on the quantity of oil present in the oilseed, the quantity of oil that can remain in the meal, how much meal protein denaturation is allowed, the investment capital available, and how restrictive the environmental laws are regarding emissions of organic compounds. Oil-bearing fruits are pressed to obtain oil, sometimes after drying (as with coconut copra) or sterilizing (as with palm fruit), or are cold pressed to preserve flavor and odor (as with olives). Animal tissues may be wet- or dry-rendered to separate the fats. 2.2.1 Oilseed Extraction Most oilseeds require some degree of cleaning and preparation before the oil is separated from the solid portion of the seed. Foreign matter reduces oil and protein yields, adversely affects oil quality, and increases wear and damage to the processing equipment. Stems, pods, leaves, broken grain, dirt, small stones, and extraneous seeds are the typical components of the foreign material found in soybeans, sunflower seeds, safflower seeds, canola seeds, and peanuts. High-capacity dry screeners are used to remove all materials that are over- or undersize by utilizing a combination of screens and aspiration. Permanent or electromagnets also are used for the removal
Basestock
Expeller
Post Bleaching
Hydrogenation
Blending
Bleaching
Degumming
Solvent Extraction
Expaner
Shortening Plasticization & Packaging
Bleaching
Water Wash
Flaking & Spray Chilling
Plasticization & Tempering
Caustic Refining
Rendering
Animal Fatty Tissues
Interesterification
Filtration
Hardstock
Bulk Fats & Oils Shipments
Deodorization or Steam Refining
Fractionation
Margarine Mixing, Chilling & Packaging
Caustic Refining
Oilseeds Cleaning, Dehulling, Flaking, Cooking
Caustic Refining
Figure 2.1 Typical fats and oils processing sequence.
Liquid Oil Filling & Packaging
Dewaxing
Sterilize & Strip
Press or Centrifuge
Degumming
Dried
Cleaning & Washing
Oil Bearing Fruits & Nuts
Fats and Oils Processing 75
76
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
of tramp iron objects. Cottonseed requires an additional delinting process to remove the white or fuzzy linters from the seed. After cleaning, most of the seeds are dehulled. The hulls have a low oil content (usually less than 1%), will absorb and retain oil in the press cake, and reduce the capacity of the extraction equipment. Additionally, some oilseed hulls contain highmelting waxes that extract with the oil. An aspirator separates the hulls from the kernels or meats, which are further processed to separate the oil and meal. Usually, only about half of the sunflower seed hulls are removed. Canola and safflower seeds are not dehulled because their small size makes it difficult to remove the hulls efficiently. The oil extraction process is facilitated by the reduction of the seed to small particles. Size reduction to disrupt the oil-bearing cells can be accomplished by grinding or rolling the seeds to produce flakes. Most extraction plants prefer to flake the oilseeds, but it is necessary to rough grind some of the larger oilseeds before sending the pieces through the flaking rollers. The next step in oilseed preparation is heating or cooking the ground or flaked oilseed. Cooking temperatures can vary with the seed type and may range from 80 to 105°C (176 to 221°F). However, studies have shown that phospholipase D, an enzyme that makes the phosphatides nonhydratable and more difficult to remove, is highly active at 135 to 185°F (57 to 85°C), therefore, this cooking temperature range should be avoided.1 Proper cooking results in the complete breakdown of the oil cells, coagulation of the proteins to facilitate the oil and meal separation, insolubilization of the phospholipids, increased fluidity of the oil at higher temperatures, destruction of molds and bacteria, inactivation of enzymes, and drying to a suitable moisture content. The effect of the enzymes on oils are that (1) lipase causes an increase in FFA, (2) lipoxygenase causes higher peroxide and secondary oxidation products, (3) phosphalipase causes elevated nonhydratable phospholipids, and (4) myrosinase causes the formation of sulfur compounds and meal flavor and digestive problems. For cottonseed, cooking also destroys or deactivates gossypol, a complex polyphenolic compound that is toxic to swine and poultry.2,3 Before the expander was introduced, cooking was the final oilseed-conditioning step. The expander is a low-shear extruder that heats, homogenizes, and shapes oilseeds into porous collets or pellets with a high bulk density. Steam is injected into the oilseed flakes or cake in the expander, under pressure, and then this mixture is extruded through plates to the atmosphere. The collets expand when released to the atmosphere, hence the name expander. Expanders produce collets capable of direct solvent extraction providing a 15 to 30% increase in capacity with reduced retention times. Expanders also affect oil quality; they inactivate catabolic enzymes that promote oxidization of unsaturated fatty acids and produce higher levels of phosphatides that are more hydratable for easier removal with water degumming.3,4 2.2.1.1 Expeller or Screw Press Extraction Expeller pressing mechanically squeezes the oil from the seed. Mechanical pressing is normally applied to seed that is relatively high in extractable oil and is
Fats and Oils Processing
77
limited to minor oilseeds or locations in which raw materials are not sufficient or local regulations prohibit solvent extraction plants. In the screw press, the cooked flakes are separated into crude oil and press cake. The press cake, which can contain 3 to 10% oil, is usually ground into meal and sold as a protein source. After settling and filtration to remove fine particles, the crude oil is then transferred to oil refiners for further processing into finished product formulations. Continuous screw presses are used for the mechanical extraction of soybeans, flaxseed, peanuts, copra or coconut, palm kernel, and other oilseed varieties in various parts of the world. Lower expelling temperatures of cold-pressed oil at 95 to 140°F improves the oil quality with regard to phospholipids and color over the warm-pressed oil at 158 to 230°F (70 to 110°C). However, oil yield and the levels of nutritional components, such as tocopherols, carotene, and phenolic acids are improved with the higher temperature pressing. Enhanced crude oil quality obtained by expelling rather than solvent extraction may allow milder processing conditions, such as elimination of caustic refining in favor of acid degumming and a lower deodorization temperature.5 2.2.1.2 Prepress Solvent Extraction Prepress solvent extraction removes a portion of the oil with expellers and the remainder of the oil is extracted with an organic solvent. During prepressing, the expeller is choked so that less pressure develops and less oil is recovered. The oil content of the prepress cake is typically 15 to 18%. The remaining oil in this partially de-oiled cake is then solvent-extracted using the same procedure as for direct solvent extraction. The prepressed and solvent-extracted oils are usually mixed before refining. The advantages of this system are that the capacity of the screw press is increased and a smaller solvent extraction plant is required to recover the oil from the de-oiled press cake. 2.2.1.3 Direct Solvent Extraction Direct solvent extraction removes the oil directly from conditioned oilseeds with an organic solvent. Solvent extraction of soybean flakes was a common practice in the United States as early as 1940, but it was problematic for oilseeds with high oil contents, such as cottonseed, sunflower, rapeseed, safflower, and peanut. The high oil content of the oilseed flakes caused them to disintegrate into fines during the extraction process. A low-shear extrusion method, with equipment identified as expanders, solved this problem. After the oilseeds have been properly prepared, the extraction process can begin. The theory of extraction is very simple: Leach the oil out of the cake, flakes, or collets with a solvent, usually hexane. Even though elevated temperatures reduce oil viscosity and enhance diffusion, the hexane vapor pressure limits the practical operating temperatures of the extractor and its contents to approximately 50 to 55°C (122 to 131°F). Separation of
78
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
the oil and solvent is accomplished by conventional distillation methods. The full miscella, which is the solvent and oil mixture, is distilled to free the oil from the solvent. The recovered solvent is separated from the accumulated moisture in a gravity separation tank and reused in the solvent-extraction operation. The hexanefree oil is cooled and filtered before storage or further processing.2-4,6-8 Solvent extraction may decrease oil quality in comparison to the pressing process because of the increased content of undesirable minor components, such as phospholipids and colorants.5 2.2.2 Oil-Bearing Fruit Extraction Two oil-bearing fruits of commercial importance are olive and palm. The oils from these fruits must be recovered by processes different from those used for oilseeds and animal tissues. 2.2.2.1 Olive Oil Extraction Olives must be harvested as soon as they reach maturity and brought directly to the extraction plant after collection. Because it is a fruit, it cannot be stored as if it was a seed nor can it be dried to preserve it. Olive oil has to be extracted as soon as possible before the acidity increases and impairs quality. The olives are ground or milled to a course paste after separating out the foreign material and washing. Milling releases the oil from the oil-bearing cells and helps smaller droplets of oil merge into larger drops. Three general procedures are utilized for oil extraction from the paste: hydraulic presses, continuous centrifuges, and adhesion filtering. The adhesion filtration equipment has a series of steel blades that are dipped into the olive paste and then withdrawn, after which the oil is allowed to drip off the blades. Three fractions are separated from the olive paste: (1) oil, (2) wastewater, and (3) husks or residue. The husks are dried and the remaining oil extracted with solvent, thus, two oil types are obtained from olives: (1) olive oil, which is pressed without further processing (other than washing, decantation, centrifugation, and filtration) and contains less than 3.5% FFA; and (2) pomace oil, which is obtained by solvent extraction of the husks and does not qualify as olive oil.6,9 2.2.2.2 Palm Oil Extraction In contrast to other oils, palm oil is expressed by cooking and pressing. First, it is sterilized with steam at 266 to 293°F (130 to 145°C) for about one hour to inactivate hydrolytic enzymes, loosens the individual fruits, and prepares it for subsequent processing steps. The sterilized fruits are stripped from the bunch stalks by vigorous shaking and beating using drum-type strippers. Then, the fruits are reheated to 95 to 100°C (203 to 212°F) for 20 to 30 minutes in a digester to loosen the pericarp from the nuts and to break the oil cells. The liquid and semisolid phases are then
Fats and Oils Processing
79
separated with a screw press similar to those used for oilseed extraction. The liquid phase is centrifuged and vacuum dried to remove moisture. The quality of the palm oil is dependent on the fruit bunches delivered to the oil mill. Overripe fruit bruises easily, accelerating FFA rise through enzymatic hydrolysis and adversely affecting bleachability of the extracted oil.10 2.2.3 Animal Fat Recovery Animal fats are recovered from fatty tissues by cooking processes known as rendering. The two predominant rendering processes are wet and dry rendering. Wet rendering produces the better quality oil while dry rendering produces the best quality protein. The wet process is preferred for edible animal fats and the dry process for inedible products. Regardless of the process used, the materials from the meatpacking plant to be rendered are broken up into small pieces (2 to 5 cm) with a crusher or prebreaker. The pieces are then cooked in batch or continuous cookers with agitation to evaporate the moisture, break down the fat cells, and release the fat. The procedure after this point defines the rendering process utilized. 2.2.3.1 Wet Rendering The two varieties of wet rendering are low temperature, which is conducted at temperatures up to the boiling point of water, and high temperature or steam rendering, which is carried out under pressure in closed vessels. Most of the edible animal fat produced in the United States is rendered by the steam process. Lard produced with this process is identified as prime steam lard. The typical equipment used is a vertical cylindrical steel vessel with a cone bottom, designed for a steam pressure of 40 to 60 psi (2.7 to 4 bar) and a corresponding high temperature. The vessel is filled with the fatty material from the cooking operation plus a small amount of water, and steam is injected to boil the water and displace the air. The vessel is then closed, except for a small vent, and steam injection is continued until the operating temperature and pressure are attained. Under these conditions, the fat separates from the solids and rises to the top of the vessel. The pressure is then released and the fat is drawn off and purified by settling or with a centrifuge. Some hydrolysis of the fat occurs during steam rendering to elevate the FFA content above 0.35%. 2.2.3.2 Dry Rendering Dry rendering involves cooking the material at 115 to 120°C (239 to 248°F) in agitated, steam-jacketed vessels until the moisture has evaporated, usually 1.5 to 4 hours. No steam is injected into the fatty material during processing as with the wet process. The cooked material is then screened to drain off the free fat before pressing the high-protein solids to separate the remaining 6 to 10% residual fat. The fats accumulated are then centrifuged or filtered.6,7
80
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
2.3 REFINING SYSTEMS All crude fats and oils obtained after rendering, crushing, or solvent extraction inevitably contain variable amounts of nontriglyceride components, such as fatty acids, mono- and diglycerides, phosphatides, sterols, tocopherols, hydrocarbons, pigments (gossypol, chlorophyll), vitamins (carotene), sterol glucosides, glycolipids, protein fragments, traces of pesticides, and trace metals, as well as resinous and mucilaginous materials. The quantities of the nontriglycerides vary with the oil source, extraction process, season, and geographical source. Removal of the objectionable nontriglyceride constituents in the fat or oil with the least possible damage to the triglycerides and minimal loss of desirable constituents is the objective of the refining process. The objectionable components interfere with further processing and cause the oil to darken, foam, smoke, precipitate, and develop off-flavors.11 The two major purification-processing methods are chemical refining and physical refining. In chemical refining, FFA, most of the phosphatides, and other impurities are neutralized with an alkaline solution, usually NaOH (sodium hydroxide). In physical refining, the FFA is removed by distillation during deodorization, and the phosphatides and other impurities must be removed prior to steam distillation. Physical refining is still some distance away from being applicable to all fats and oils. Currently, the refining method of choice is determined by the characteristics of the individual crude fats and oils: (1) fats and oils that are normally physically refined, (2) fats and oils that can be physically or chemically refined, and (3) fats and oils that can only be chemically refined. Low-phosphatide crude oils, such as palm, palm kernel, and coconut, are almost always physically refined. Tallow and lard processing can also be identified as a form of physical refining. Seed oils, such as canola, sunflower, and corn, fall into the either/or category, the choice being determined by process economics and local environmental requirements for handling soapstock and wastewater generated by chemical refining. Soybean oil can also be physically refined depending on the treatment of the bean before and during extraction. To obtain good-quality fats and oils with physical refining, it is essential to have a phosphorus content lower than 5 ppm before steam stripping. Some oils, such as cottonseed, cannot be physically refined; an alkali treatment is required to remove the gossypol pigment. 2.4 PHYSICAL REFINING Physical refining was utilized as early as 1930 as a process for the preneutralization of products with a high initial FFA content. In this case, preneutralization was followed by caustic refining. Later, it was found possible to physically refine lauric oils and tallow if the proper pretreatment was applied before steam distillation. Physical refining became a reality in the 1950s for processing palm oil, which typically contains high FFA and low gum contents. The palm oil process
Fats and Oils Processing
81
subjected the crude feedstock first to pretreatment and then to deacidification. The pretreatment consisted of a degumming step and an earth bleaching step, which together remove certain nonvolatile impurities by filtration. Volatile and thermally labile components are removed during the conditions of steam distillation under vacuum, which originally gave the process its name of steam refining.12 However, for vegetable oils, such as soybeans, that contain relatively low levels of FFA and higher amounts of phosphatides, physical refining only recently became a possibility. The traditional edible oil processing system consists of caustic neutralization, bleaching, and deodorization. Caustic neutralization of vegetable oils with high phosphatide contents delivers a soapstock that is a mixture of sodium salts of fatty acids, neutral oil, water, unused caustic, and other compounds resulting from the reactions of the caustic with various impurities in the oil. Disposal of this soapstock or the waste streams from soapstock processing systems has become increasingly more expensive. A second problem associated with chemical neutralization is the loss of neutral oil, which reduces the overall yield from the crude oil. Elimination of the caustic refining step is economically attractive, but it means that degumming or some other pretreatment process or system must assume all the functions of the alkali refining process, except for FFA removal. Physical refining can remove the FFA, as well as the unsaponifiable and other impurities, by steam stripping, thus eliminating the production of soapstock and keeping neutral oil loss to a minimum. However, degumming and pretreatment of the oil are still required to remove those impurities that darken or otherwise cause a poor-quality product when heated to the temperatures required for steam distillation. Crude oil pretreatment is normally a two-step operation — the addition of a chemical is required to remove any trace quantities of gums remaining after water degumming and bleaching. Following pretreatment, all the FFA and any remaining trace impurities are removed by steam distillation in a single unit. Soapstock acidulation is eliminated with physical refining, and a higher-grade distilled fatty acid is recovered directly from the oil without major pollution problems. Figure 2.2 compares physical refining processes for low- and high-phospholipid fats and oils. Vegetable oil refining has to cope with many minor components. After water degumming, a number of impurities must still be removed or converted: carotenoids, chlorophyll, brown pigments, phosphatides, metals, free sugars, FFA, and oxidizing lipids. Steam stripping can convert the carotenoids and remove FFA, most off-flavors, and pesticides, but the other impurities must be handled before the distillation step,13 therefore, the pretreatment step is critical to the success of the physical refining process. The major process variables in pretreatment are (1) pretreatment chemical, concentration, and level; (2) bleaching clay and level; and (3) operating conditions. Normally, for a single-source oil with a history of consistent quality, the pretreatment process variables can be expected to remain fairly constant, but when more than one source oil is processed, varying conditions and chemical treatments must be considered.14
82
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Low-Phosphatide Crude Fats & Oils
High Phosphatide Crude Fats & Oils Acid Refining or Degumming (Water, Acid, Enzymatic, or Another Process) Dry Degumming or Bleaching
Dry Degumming Dewaxing Fractionation Hydrogenation Interesterification Steam Distillation Deodorized Fat or Oil Figure 2.2 Physical refining process flow.
Pretreated and bleached oil can be hydrogenated before steam refining to strip the fatty acids, flavors, and odors. The operating temperatures of the steam-refining deodorizer are the same as those used for deodorization of chemically refined oils, usually over 440°F (225°C). Deodorizers designed for steam refining of the higher FFA oils should experience no reduction in production rates; however, a rate reduction should be expected with deodorizers designed to remove the lower FFA levels from caustic neutralized oils. The principal advantage for steam refining a low FFA oil, such as soybean, corn, peanut, sunflower, safflower, or canola, is the reduction of plant pollutants commonly caused by the acidulation of soapstock produced with conventional caustic refining. The economics for steam refining are usually favorable for high FFA products, such as palm and the lauric oils. Analyses indicate that no operating cost advantages can be gained by physically refining low-acidity oils,15 that make up the majority of the oils processed in the United States. Additionally, flavor stability and potential unsatisfactory bleached color concerns still exist. Flavor evaluation work at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Northern Regional Research Center indicated that steam-refined soybean oil was equivalent to caustic-refined product; however, some of the test results indicated a potential problem with oxidative stability, which was not duplicated with further test work.16 Another consideration is that certain oils contain impurities that cannot be adequately removed by the pretreatment process to enable them to be physically
Fats and Oils Processing
83
refined to the required quality standards. Cottonseed oil falls into this category due to its gossypol content. This pigment is sensitive to heat and oxidation and forms color compounds that are difficult to remove from the oil except by reaction with caustic soda. 2.5 REFINING PRETREATMENT A degumming process is crucial for physical refining, but optional for chemical refining. It consists of the treatment of crude oils with water, salt solutions, enzymes, caustic soda, or dilute acids, such as phosphoric, citric, or maleic, to remove phosphatides, waxes, prooxidants, and other impurities. The degumming processes convert the phosphatides to hydrated gums, which are insoluble in oil and readily separated as sludge by settling, filtering, or centrifugal action. For physical refining, phosphorus must be reduced to less than 30 ppm with degumming so that bleaching or dry degumming can further reduce this level to less than 5 ppm and remove all traces of iron and copper. Acid or enzymatic degumming processes are normally employed to achieve these results, especially with seed oils. With chemical refining, the phosphatides can either be recovered for their byproduct value through water degumming or be treated as impurities that must be removed from the crude oil. Most of the vegetable oils processed in the United States are chemically refined without degumming. It has been estimated that less than one third of the processed soybean oil will satisfy the demand for lecithin.17 Crusher/refiners can add the separated gums back to the meal, but most stand-alone processors lack a market or profitable outlet for the gums and forgo degumming. The decision not to degum oil can be based both on energy conservation and capital savings; a separate, combined degumming and refining process can be carried out in one step with the primary centrifuge for caustic refining. However, vegetable oil degumming offers several potential advantages: • It is necessary for lecithin production. The hydrated gums are the raw materials for lecithin processing. • It satisfies export oil requirements for a product free of impurities that could settle out during shipment. • It reduces the chemical refining neutral oil loss. Gum removal prior to alkali refining often improves yield because the phosphates can act as emulsifiers in a caustic solution to increase the neutral oil entrained in the soapstock. • It substantially reduces refinery waste load due to the lower neutral oil losses and the reduction of gums discharged. • It improves acidulation performance. The soapstock from alkali refining is easier to acidulate due to lower emulsifier content, and the acid water has less impact on the wastewater treatment systems. • It prepares the oil for physical or steam refining. Degummed oil is more suited to physical refining techniques due to the significant reduction in nonvolatile impurities, such as phosphatides and metallic prooxidants.
84
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Crude Vegetable Oil Heating 140 to 160°F or 60 to 71°C Water ca. 2.0%
Mixing ca. 30 minutes
Centrifuge
Hydrated Gums
Vacuum Dryer 50mm Hg ABS 180°F min or 82.2°C min
Vacuum Dryer 50mm Hg ABS 180° or 82.2°C min 0.5% Moisture
Cooler 120 to 130°F or 48.9 to 54.4°C
Cooler 120°F or 48.9°C
Degummed Oil
Lecithin Work Tank
Figure 2.3 Batch water degumming process flow.
2.5.1 Water Degumming The main purpose of the water degumming process is to produce an oil that does not deposit a residue during transportation and storage. The batch water degumming process most commonly practiced in the United States is diagrammed in Figure 2.3. Approximately 2% water, by oil volume, is brought into contact with the crude oil by mechanical agitation in a mix tank. The proper amount of water is normally about 75% of the phosphatide content of the oil. Too little water produces dark viscous gums and a hazy oil, while too much water causes excess oil losses through hydrolysis. Complete hydration requires approximately 30 minutes of agitation at 140 to 160°F (60 to 71°C) for batch processing. Temperature is important because degumming is less complete at higher temperatures due to the increased solubility of the phosphatides in the oil; also, at lower temperatures the increased oil viscosity makes separation of the phosphatides more difficult. For continuous systems, preheated oil (80°C or 176°F) is treated with water and mixed in a holding tank for approximately 15 minutes (or for less than 1 minute with continuous inline agitators). The water–oil mixture must be treated very
Fats and Oils Processing
85
gently to avoid developing an emulsion; high shear stress in the feed pump and at the centrifuge inlet must be avoided. After hydration, centrifuges separate the sludge and degummed oil phases. The degummed oil can be vacuum dried and pumped to degummed oil storage or it can proceed directly to the refining process. The hydrated gums can be vacuum dried for crude lecithin processing or added back into the meal.18 Water-degummed oil still contains phosphatides, only the hydratable phosphatides are removed with water degumming. Typically, oils will have an 80- to 200-ppm phosphatide content after water degumming, depending on the type and quality of the crude oil. The nonhydratable phosphatides, which are the calcium and magnesium salts of phosphatidic acid and phosphatidyl ethanolamine, remain in the oil after water degumming. The amount of the nonhydratable phosphatides in the oil is related to the general quality of the oil and, in particular, to the degree of action of the enzyme phospholipase. This enzyme is responsible for the production of phosphatidic acid from hydratable phosphatides.19 2.5.2 Acid Degumming Acid degumming leads to lower residual phosphorus content than water degumming and, therefore, is a good alternative if dry degumming and physical refining are to be the next refining steps. The acid degumming process might be considered as a variant of the water degumming process in that it uses a combination of water and acid. The nonhydratable gums, consisting mainly of the calcium and magnesium salts of phosphatidic acid and phosphatidyl ethanolamine, can be conditioned into hydratable forms with a degumming acid. This acid liberates the phosphatidic acid and phosphatidylethanolamine and forms a binding complex with the calcium and magnesium divalent metal ions that can be removed with the aqueous phase. Phosphoric and citric acids are used because they are food grade, sufficiently strong, and they bind divalent metal ions. Citric acid is usually preferable because it does not increase the phosphorus content in the oil. Because they do not dissolve in oil, the degumming acids must be finely dispersed for maximum contact with the nonhydratable phosphatide complexes. To facilitate their removal, the salts formed with the degumming acid must not be oil soluble. For this reason, acetic acid or its anhydride, although strong enough and food grade, is not an appropriate degumming acid. The gums isolated with an acid degumming process are not suitable for standard lecithin because their phosphatide composition differs from those obtained with water degumming (higher phosphatidic acid) and they contain the degumming acid.20 Several acid degumming processes have been developed to attain a phosphorus value lower than 5 ppm that is required for good-quality physically refined oils. In the super-degumming process developed by Unilever,21 mild temperatures are used in a complicated multiple-holding steps process. First, the oil is heated to 70°C, modified lecithin is optionally mixed into the oil, and then a strong solution of citric acid is added as a degumming acid to decompose the nonhydratable phosphatides.
86
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
After a reaction period, the mixture is cooled to below 40°C, and water is added to promote the dissociation of the liberated free phosphatidic acid and phosphatidylethanolamine. A further three-hour holding time is provided to form liquid phosphatide crystals at this reduced temperature. These crystals are then removed by centrifuge, and the oil mixture is heated again before being fed to the centrifugal separator. The residual phosphorus content is generally below 30 ppm, probably due to the increased phosphate hydration; however, these levels are quite dependent on the starting oil quality. 2.5.3 Dry Degumming In dry degumming, the oil is treated with an acid to decompose the metal ion/ phosphatide complexes and is then mixed with bleaching earth. The earth containing the degumming acid, phosphatides, pigments, and other impurities is then removed by filtration. Its main advantage is that it does not generate an aqueous effluent, apart from the water involved in the vacuum system. Typically, this process is utilized for oils with low phosphatide contents, such as palm oil, palm kernel, coconut, and tallow. Seed oils that have been water or acid degummed may also be dry degummed to ensure a low phosphorus oil to steam distillation. The dry degumming process uses standard bleaching equipment. Acid, usually 85% phosphoric, is dispersed in 80 to 100°C oil at 0.05 to 1.2% of the oil. After a short reaction time, some water can be added to enhance bleaching efficiency before 1 to 3% bleaching earth is added and the vacuum applied. The amount of bleaching earth is dependent on the phosphatide content of the oil. Normally, this process requires about 115% of the level used to bleach chemically refined oils or fats. The oil is then heated to bleaching temperature (120 to 140°C) for about 15 minutes and then cooled below 100°C. Finally, the bleaching earth is removed by filtration. An increase in FFA of less than 0.2% should be expected, but the final phosphorus content must be reduced to less than 5 ppm. 2.5.4 Enzymatic Degumming The Enzymax® enzymatic degumming process has been proven commercially in Mannheim, Germany. Phospholipase A1, the preferred enzyme for degumming, is produced by microbial fermentation. The degumming enzyme changes the phospholipids into lysophospholipids and FFA. The process advantages include:
1. Enzymatic reactions are usually carried out under mild conditions. 2. The enzymes are highly specific. 3. The process has acceptable reaction rates. 4. Only small quantities of the enzyme are required to carry out the chemical reactions. 5. Degummed oils with low phosphorus and iron contents are produced even with poor-quality starting oils.
Fats and Oils Processing
87
The enzymatic process has three important steps: (1) adjustment of the pH with a buffer, (2) enzymatic reaction in the holding tanks, and (3) separation of the sludge from the oil. The buffer, a weak solution of approximately 1.4 parts citric acid to 1 part NaOH, is added to oil at 70 to 75°C to adjust the pH to about 4.5. The oil temperature is reduced to 40°C before adding the liquid enzyme phospholipase A1. The enzyme is added at a level of 200,000 units in 7.5 liters of water per ton of oil. A high-shear mixer is used to mix the enzyme with the oil before the mixture is pumped to a holding tank for a period of less than six hours. After the reaction has been completed, the temperature is raised to 75°C for more efficient separation of the gums in a centrifuge. The phosphorus content of crude soybean, canola, and sunflower has measured consistently below 10 mg/kg with an iron content below 0.5 mg/kg even with poor-quality crude oils. The gums recovered from this process were found suitable for lecithin production.22 The enzymatic degumming process has been found to be applicable to most vegetable oils except for cottonseed and corn oils. 2.5.5 Modified Acid Degumming Modified acid refining is a physical refining pretreatment that incorporates the benefits of caustic soda neutralization. This physical refining preparatory process treats the oil with a degumming acid and then partially neutralizes it with NaOH in solution. The amount of NaOH used is limited to prevent soap formation. The metal– phospholipid complexes are dissociated by the acid into insoluble metal salts and phospholipids in their acid form, which are still soluble in oil. The NaOH addition raises the pH and converts the phospholipids into sodium salts that are hydratable. The hydrated salts can be centrifuged for separation or dried to form agglomerates for adsorption on silica, which can be removed with filtration. The acid degumming treatment will generally reduce phosphorus to between 25 and 35 ppm. Neutralization with NaOH after the acid treatment should reduce the phosphorus content to 15 to 25 ppm. These treatments followed by either a water wash or the use of silica will further reduce the phosphorus to the 5 ppm maximum required for physical refining. Silica adsorbents are added with a separate mixing step before bleaching and can be removed with a separate filtration or with the spent bleaching earth. Some consider acid refining an intermediate between acid degumming and chemical refining. This process should be applicable to all types of oils, either crude or previously degummed.15,23,24 2.5.6 Membrane Filter Degumming Membrane processing has been applied to remove phospholipids from crude oil/ hexane mixtures as well as from crude oil itself without the addition of an organic solvent. Pagliero et al.25 showed that membranes were suitable for removing phospholipids from the miscella of crude oil and hexane. Subramanian et al.26 reduced phospholipids in soybean oil in the range of 85.8 to 92.8% with surfactant-aided membrane degumming. The phosphorus content of the degummed oil was 20 to
88
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
58 ppm. The high membrane reduction level indicates that hydratable and nonhydratable phospholipids were removed from the soybean oil. Commercialization of a membrane filtering system to simultaneously degum and refine in a single step is reportedly in progress.27 This system is expected to produce a membrane-separated oil with a phosphorus level of <2.0 ppm and reduction of the chlorophyll content by more than half.28
2.6 CHEMICAL REFINING The conventional caustic soda process is the most widely used and best-known refining system. The addition of an alkali solution to a crude oil brings about a number of chemical and physical reactions. The alkali combines with the FFA present to form soaps; the phosphatides and gums absorb alkali and are coagulated through hydration or degradation; much of the coloring is degraded, absorbed by the gums, or made water soluble by the alkali; and the insoluble matter is entrained with the other coagulable material. With heat and time, the excess caustic can also bring about the saponification of a portion of the neutral oil, therefore, selection of the NaOH strength, mixing time, mixing energy, temperature, and the quantity of excess caustic all have an important part in making the alkali refining process operate effectively and efficiently. The current alkali refining practices are a result of the gradual application of science to the basic art of batch refining originally performed in open-top, cone-shaped kettles during the first part of the twentieth century. Efficient separation of soapstock from neutralized oil is the significant factor in alkali refining; the technique of using centrifugal separators was conceived before the twentieth century, but did not become a commercial reality until 1932. The conventional caustic-soda continuous system that evolved has the flexibility to efficiently refine all the crude oils presently utilized in the United States. The system may be outlined as follows: • Crude Receipts—Crude or degummed oils are received by railcar, truck, or barge or from onsite extraction or degumming operations. • Sampling—Receipts are sampled, analyzed, and then transferred to the appropriate storage tanks. For optimum performance, degummed soybean oil should have a phosphatide content below 0.3%. If this level is exceeded, nondegummed oil should be blended with the degummed oil to attain a 1.0% phosphatide content. • Crude Oil Conditioning—As needed, the oils are transferred to the appropriate pretreatment or supply tank. Crude oils with high levels of phosphatides, such as soybean and canola oils, are usually treated with food-grade phosphoric acid for a minimum of four hours (eight hours preferred) before refining — 300 to 1000 ppm for soybean and 1000 to 3000 ppm for canola. The purpose of the acid pretreatment is to (1) precipitate phosphatidic materials, (2) precipitate natural calcium and magnesium as insoluble phosphate salts, (3) inactivate trace metals, such as iron and copper, that may be present in the oil, (4) reduce the neutral oil losses, (5)
Fats and Oils Processing
89
destabilize and improve the removal of chlorophyll in bleaching, and (6) improve the color and flavor stability of the finished deodorized oil. • Caustic Treatment—The degummed or acid-conditioned crude oil is continuously mixed with a proportioned stream of dilute caustic soda solution and heated to break the emulsion. Selection of the caustic treatment is determined by the type of crude oil, FFA content, past refining experience with similar oils, and the refining equipment available. In general, the minimum amount of the weakest strength necessary to achieve the desired endpoint should be used to minimize saponification of neutral oil and prevent “three phasing” or emulsions during separation. Usually, the best results are obtained with relatively weak caustic solutions or lyes on low FFA oils and with stronger lyes on high FFA oils. The strength of the caustic solution is measured in terms of specific gravity, expressed in degrees Baumé (°Bé). The caustic treatment selected for the crude oil will vary with the free fatty acid content, the amount of acid pretreatment, and the level of caustic “excess” over “theoretical” determined for each oil type from previous experience. The theoretical quantity of caustic is based on the ratio of molecular weights of sodium hydroxide to oleic fatty acid. This factor is determined as follows:
Factor =
NaOH molecular weight
Oleic fatty acid molecular weight
=
40
282
= 0.142
Thus, the formula for caustic treatment is
% Treatment =
(%FFA × 0.142 ) + %Excess + Acid addition %NaOH in caustic
×100
The phosphorus reduction during refining is determined largely by the amount of water present in the caustic solution. Higher excess caustic treatments remove more phosphorus, but the increase in removal is due more to the increased water than NaOH. Comparative studies have shown that more dilute caustic solutions will remove more phosphorus, therefore, crude oils with high phosphorus levels are best refined with dilute caustic solutions, but if they become too diluted then difficult emulsion separation characteristics develop. For this reason, dilute caustic solutions or low Baumé concentrations are recommended for soybean, peanut, safflower, sunflower, and canola oils. The refining conditions for cottonseed oil are chosen more for the improvement of color because of the presence of gossypol. This pigment is sensitive to heat and oxidation and forms colored compounds that are difficult to remove from the oil other than by reaction with caustic. Therefore, the caustic treatment has a greater excess of a more concentrated NaOH solution. Palm, palm kernel, and coconut oils require a weaker caustic of approximately 12°Bé to optimize centrifugal separation, reduce saponification of the neutral oil, and minimize emulsions. The diluted caustic for use with the lauric and palm oils is usually preheated to 150°F (65°C) to minimize emulsion formation in the separators. These oils also require only a minimum of excess treatment as well (0.02%) because they are refined for FFA,
90
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 2.1 Caustic Treat for Vegetable Oils Concentration Crude Oil
°Bé
NaOH, %a
Excess Treat, %
Cottonseed
19 to 21
13.52 to 15.23
0.16
Corn
16 to 20
11.06 to 14.36
0.13
Canola
16 to 18
11.06 to 12.68
0.07 0.12
Soybean: Crude
12 to 16
8.0 to 11.06
Degummed or mixed
12 to 16
8.0 to 11.06
0.10
Safflower
14 to 18
9.5 to 12.68
0.12
Sunflower
14 to 18
9.5 to 12.68
0.12
Peanut
13 to 15
8.75 to 10.28
0.12
Coconut
11 to 12
7.29 to 8.00
0.02
Palm kernel
11 to 12
7.29 to 8.00
0.02
Palm
11 to 12
7.29 to 8.00
0.02
Note: At 15°C (59°F). a
reduction only. It should be remembered that the FFA for coconut and palm kernel oils are calculated on the basis of lauric fatty acid instead of oleic as for the other vegetable oils. Suggested caustic concentrations and excess treatments for various crude vegetable oils as a starting point before experience is gained are shown on Table 2.1. A smooth reproducible flow of the caustic solution into the oil stream is important because pulsing delivery will carry through the mixers and produce varying mixture densities in the centrifuge. • Caustic–Oil Mixing—After the caustic reagent has been proportioned into the crude oil, it must be adequately blended to ensure sufficient contact with the FFA, phosphatides, and color pigments. The gums are hydrolyzed by the water in the caustic solution and become oil insoluble. The caustic and soft oils are mixed at 30 to 35°C (86 to 95°F) in a dwell mixer with a 5- to 15-minute residence time. High oil temperatures during the caustic addition must be avoided because they can increase the neutral oil saponification and reduce the refined oil yield. Many refineries will use an inline shear mixer to obtain the intimate contact time between caustic and oil followed by a delay period in the dwell mixer prior to centrifugation. After the caustic-mixing phase is complete, the mixture should be delivered to the centrifuges at a temperature suitable for optimum separation. Most soft oils are heated to 165°F (74°C) to provide the thermal shock necessary to break the emulsion. • Soap–Oil Separation—Refining yield efficiency is dependent on the primary separation step. From the caustic–oil mixer, the resultant soap-in-oil suspension is fed to high-speed centrifuges for separation into light- and heavy-density phases. These separators are designed to divide suspensions of insoluble liquids and solids in suspension with different specific gravities. The light-phase discharge is the neutral oil containing traces of moisture and soap. The heavy-phase, or soapstock, discharge is primarily insoluble soap, meal, free caustic, phosphatides, and small quantities
Fats and Oils Processing
of neutral oil. Refined oil yield and quality depend on a uniform feedstock and separation of the heavy phase with the least amount of entrained oil; however, even under the most optimum conditions, complete separation of the two phases cannot be achieved. Therefore, the primary separation is accomplished by allowing a small amount of the soapstock phase to pass along with the refined oil for removal by the water wash centrifuge.29 Various types of centrifuges are used in vegetable oil refining; however, most centrifuges contain a bowl or hollow cylinder that turns on its axis. The flow of material enters the rotating bowl and is forced outward to a disk stack. The heavier density soapstock is forced to the outside of the bowl and flows over the top disk and out the discharge port. The lighter neutral-oil phase moves to the center of the bowl for discharge from the neck of the top disk. The major factors to consider for improvement of separation completeness include: (1) greater differences in the specific gravity of each phase, (2) lower viscosities, (3) higher temperatures, (4) shorter travel distance for the heavy particles, (5) increased centrifugal forces, and (6) longer centrifugal dwell times.18 • Water Washing—Refined oil from the primary centrifuge is washed with hot softened water or recovered steam condensate proportioned into the oil at a rate of 10 to 20% of the oil flow. Softened water must be used to avoid the formation of insoluble soaps. Sodium soaps remaining from the primary centrifugation phase are readily washable and easily removed from the oil with either a single or double wash. A single wash is usually sufficient; however, two washes may provide savings in bleaching earth and hydrogenation catalyst usage as well as a reduction in wash water volume.30 The water–oil mixture passes through a highspeed, inline mixer to obtain intimate contact for maximum soap transfer from the oil to the water phase. The soapy water–oil mixture continues through to the wash water centrifuge. Similar in action to the refining centrifuge, water washed oil is discharged as the light phase and the soapy water solution as the heavy phase. The water washing operation will remove about 90% of the soap content in the refined oil. Wash water temperature is important for efficient separation in the centrifuge. The water temperature should be 185 to 195°F (85 to 90°C), preferably 10 to 15°F (5 to 8°C) warmer than the oil temperature. The wash water flow rate controls soap removal and affects the oil losses in the wash water. As with the primary centrifuge, a pulsating flow of water must be avoided. Two things that water washing will not do are remove phosphatides left in the oil after the primary centrifuge and remove unwashable soaps related to the calcium and magnesium content of the crude oil. These metal complexes should have been removed in either the degumming or refining steps. Iron soaps are prooxidants, while calcium and magnesium result in nonwashable soaps.11 Some processors add up to 400 ppm citric acid to wash waters to effect the removal of these residuals.30 The water washing step with the long-mix caustic refining procedure may be eliminated with the use of soap adsorbing silica in bleaching.31 • Vacuum Drying—Water-washed oil is usually dried with a vacuum dryer before storage or bleaching. Washed oil at approximately 185°F (85°C) is passed through nozzles into the evacuated section of a continuous vacuum dryer that controls the moisture content of the washed oil to below 0.1%, most often in the range of 0.05%. A typical dryer operates at 70 cm of mercury (Hg) and is equipped with a high-level alarm and automatic shutdown capability. After drying, the refined oil should be
91
92
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
cooled to 120 to 130°F (49 to 55°C) before storage. For extended storage periods, a nitrogen sparge or a nitrogen blanket applied to the surface of the oil will minimize oxidation before use.
2.6.1 Short-Mix Caustic Refining Refining practices vary between countries and plants due to the number, quality, and kind of source oils processed. The refining practices in Europe differ from those used in the United States mainly because of the need to process all types of oils and typically poorer quality oils. The European oilseeds or crude oils must be imported, and a typical refinery must be equipped to handle all kinds of oils, depending on availability and price. The quality of the oilseeds of crude oils imported is variable, but normally a higher FFA oil is processed. The short-mix process was adopted in Europe after World War II because the relatively high FFA oils made it necessary to avoid the long contact time and the larger excess of caustic used with the conventional caustic soda refining system utilized in the United States. Figure 2.4 compares the differences between the long- and shortmix refining processes. For the short-mix process, the oil temperature is raised to 80 to 90°C (175 to 195°F) before the addition of the caustic soda. A break between the neutral oil and soapstock takes place immediately, reducing the losses due to emulsification. The contact time between the caustic and oil is reduced to 30 seconds maximum, which helps to reduce the saponification losses. Because it is standard in Europe to degum solvent-extracted oils and to condition the oils with phosphoric acid before refining, the excess caustic treat can be eliminated or reduced substantially. In the case of an oil, such as cottonseed, refined for color removal, a second caustic treatment is used. This additional phase is called re-refining. Because the bulk of the soapstock has already been removed with degumming and the initial caustic treatment, the additional losses with the second caustic treatment are relatively low. The oil is finally washed with demineralized water to help remove the traces of soap remaining in the oil and dried with processes similar to the systems used for the long-mix caustic refining process. An ultrashort-mix method is used for oils with high acidity to reduce the losses more than the regular short-mix process. For palm and other oils with high acidity levels, the caustic soda is introduced directly into the hollow centrifuge spindle where a special mixing device is located. The very short contact time allows the use of stronger caustic concentrations without excessive saponification of the neutral oil. Comparisons of palm oil refined with the ultrashort-mix process contributed considerable yield improvements over product refined with the short-mix process — 7.0 to 16.5% less loss for one evaluation.32 2.6.2 Miscella Refining Facilities with an existing oilseed solvent extraction system may find miscella refining to be advantageous because the same solvent recovery unit can be used for
Fats and Oils Processing
93
LONG MIX
SHORT MIX
Crude Oil
Crude Oil
Acid Pretreatment 225 to 750 ppm H3PO4 25 ± 5°C for 4 to 8 hours
Oil Heating 85 to 95°C
NaOH Addition 14 to 16° Bé % basis “treat” calculation
Acid Addition 425 to 1275 ppm H3PO4 for 15 to 30 seconds in high shear mixer
Dwell Mixing 15 to 30 minutes at 30 to 35°C
NaOH Addition mixed 15 to 30 sec. in high shear mixer
Thermally Shock Oil at 70 to 80°C Primary Centrifuge
Soapstock <20% oil
Primary Centrifuge
Water Wash 85 to 90°C Soft Water 10 to 15% of Oil Flow High Speed Shear Mixer
Optional 400 ppm max. citric acid
NaOH or Soft Water Mixing High Speed Shear Mixer
Water Wash Centrifuge
Wash Water Soaps
Water Wash Centrifuge
Optional Wash Water 10% of oil flow with 2 washes 93 to 95°C Soft Water
Optional 400 ppm max. citric acid
Water Wash Centrifuge
Wash Water Soaps
Vacuum Dryer 50mm Hg Dried to 0.1% H2O
Vacuum Dryer 50mm Hg Dried to 0.1% H2O
Cool to 60°C
Cool to 60°C
Refined Oil
Refined Oil
Figure 2.4 Comparison of long- and short-mix chemical refining systems.
94
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
both purposes. Miscella is the solution or mixture that contains the extracted oil. Both continuous and batch miscella refining processes are suitable for most fats and oils. Miscella refining is especially beneficial for cottonseed oil to provide oil with a lighter red color and a high neutral oil yield. This type of refining should be done at a solvent extraction plant as soon as possible, preferably within six hours after the oil is extracted from the oil seed or animal. The advantages for miscella refining, as compared to conventional continuous caustic-soda refining, are (1) higher oil yield, (2) lighter color oil without bleaching, (3) elimination of the water wash step, and (4) extraction of the color pigments before solvent stripping has set the color.33 For this purification process, the crude miscella source may be from (1) the preevaporator of a direct-solvent extraction plant, (2) a blend of prepressed crude oil and solvent-extracted miscella from the press cake, or (3) a reconstituted blend of crude oil with solvent. In the process, a mixture of approximately 40 to 58% oil in solvent is heated or cooled to 104°F (40°C) and filtered to remove meal, scale, and other insoluble impurities. Two solvents that have been used commercially for miscella refining are hexane and acetone. Hydrolysis of phosphatides and pigments in the crude oil miscella requires an acid pretreatment, which usually varies between 100 and 500 ppm by weight of the oil, depending on the quality of the crude oil. An acid, such as phosphoric or glacial acetic, has been found effective in improving oil quality and reducing refining losses. Phosphoric acid is used more commonly due to its less corrosive properties and availability. The acid is mixed with the miscella in a static mixer to provide an intimately dispersed acid phase, which immediately reacts with the crude miscella. The pretreated crude miscella is then alkali-refined using dilute caustic soda with a 16 to 24°Bé and a 0.2 to 0.5% NaOH excess over the theoretical required to neutralize the free fatty acids. The reaction of the caustic soda with the FFA proceeds rapidly at 130 to 135°F (54 to 57°C), using homogenizers with a shear mixing intensity capable of homogenizing milk and hydrolyzing the phosphatides and pigments with the caustic soda to produce a two-phase mixture. The miscella temperature is adjusted to 135°F (57°C) to obtain the best separation of the heavy phase or soapstock from the oil or the light phase with the centrifuge. The neutral oil is then filtered through a diatomaceous earth, precoated, pressure leaf filter. At this point, the refined and filtered miscella can be stripped of the solvent to produce a neutral yellow oil, or it can be further processed as miscella to dewax, fractionate, or hydrogenate the oil.34,35 Obvious disadvantages for the miscella refining process that may have discouraged many processors from adopting this processing system include:36 • Equipment: All equipment and facilities must be explosion proof for solvent handling. • Maintenance: The equipment and facilities must be well maintained to avoid excessive solvent losses and accidents. • Laboratory: More elaborate laboratory facilities and staffing are necessary to control this process.
Fats and Oils Processing
95
2.6.3 Batch Caustic Refining Batch refining is still practiced for some specialty oils in developing countries for small production lots and in most pilot-plant operations. Batch refining has some basic advantages: • • • • •
Investment costs are low. Equipment is readily available. It is practical for small lots. It is suitable for low capacities. A quality refined oil can usually be produced.
At the same time, batch refining can have some serious drawbacks: • • • •
Refining losses are high. Operational costs are high. A high load is imposed on wastewater plants. It is very time consuming.
Batch refining is most likely installed only for special conditions where the refined oil requirements are very low. Generally, two batch-refining procedures are utilized: the dry method and the wet method. The dry method is preferred in the United States for most oils, while the wet method is preferred in Europe. Coincidentally, the batch dry-method parameters resemble the long-mix caustic soda continuous refining procedure preferred in the United States, and the batch wet-method parameters resemble the short-mix continuous procedure preferred in Europe. 2.6.3.1 Dry-Method Batch Refining The equipment required for the batch dry-refining method is simple, consisting of an open-top, conical-bottom tank or kettle equipped with a two-speed agitator and steam coils for heating. The agitator shaft is centered in the vessel and is either suspended from the top or extended to a step bearing on the bottom. The agitator shaft is equipped with sweep arms, each with paddles canted to push the liquid upward during agitation. The usual agitator rates are 30 to 35 rpm maximum and 8 to 10 rpm minimum. The batch dry method consists of the following steps:36,37
1. The first stage is carried out with the oil at ambient temperature or at a temperature just high enough to keep the fat molten and liquid. If the oil contains occluded air after pumping to the refining kettle, it must be settled long enough to allow the air to escape. The soapstock can entrain enough air to float, which will prevent it from settling to the bottom of the kettle as desired. 2. The caustic solution or lye is added to the top of the kettle while agitating it at high speed. Agitation is continued to thoroughly emulsify the alkali and oil (usually 10 to 15 minutes), then the agitation is reduced to slow speed and the oil is heated to 135 to 145°F (57 to 63°C) as rapidly as possible.
96
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
3. A visible break in the emulsion will occur at about 140°F (60°C) where the soapstock separates from the clear oil in the form of small flocculent particles that tend to coalesce with agitation. 4. After the desired degree of break is obtained, agitation is stopped, heating is discontinued, and the soapstock or foots are allowed to settle to the bottom of the kettle by gravity for a minimum of 10 to 12 hours. 5. After the soapstock has settled, the neutral oil can be drawn off the top, leaving the soapstock at the bottom of the kettle. For many oils, such as soybean, canola, sunflower, safflower, and peanut, treated with a dilute caustic (usually 12 to 16°Bé with about 0.25% excess), the settled soapstock should be fluid enough to allow it to be drained from the bottom of the kettle, leaving the refined oil in the kettle. 6. Traces of moisture and soap remain in the refined oil and should be removed if the oil is going to storage before bleaching. The refined oil can be either filtered through spent bleaching earth or water washed. Kettle water washing consists of adding approximately 15% hot, soft water to the refined oil while agitating for uniform dispersion and then allowing the water to settle for decanting. Water washing may be repeated if warranted.
2.6.3.2 Wet-Method Batch Refining The preferred European batch-refining method heats the crude oil to a relatively high temperature, 150°F (65°C), before adding the caustic or lye. A high caustic concentration, 20°Bé, is used for the usually high FFA oils processed with about a 0.10% excess treatment. In many cases, the addition of salt equivalent to about 0.10% sodium chloride per 1.0% free fatty acid is necessary to break the soapstock and oil emulsion. The precipitated soapstock is washed down with a spray of hot water onto the surface of the oil. Several successive water washes are required to completely remove the soap from the oil, with a settling time required between each wash. The wet method has advantages over the dry method for refining oils with high FFA contents, such as some palm and olive oils. It has also been used for refining coconut and other lauric oils. Refining equipment for the wet method is not essentially different from that used for the dry process, except that closed tanks that can also be used for vacuum bleaching are usually used to refine and wash the crude oils with the wet method.36 2.6.4 Silica Refining Silica processing utilizes a chemically inert synthetic amorphous silica adsorbent with an affinity for polar contaminants. The surface area, porosity, and moisture content of the silica adsorbents provide them with the capability of removing soaps, phospholipids, sulfur compounds, and trace metals from edible oils. The function of the moisture is to hold the pores open and aid in the attraction of polar contaminants. Several different options are offered for the use of silica adsorbents. The simplest option adds silica adsorbent with the bleaching earth prior to bleaching to reduce the clay usage. A 40% reduction in bleaching earth usage, less neutral oil loss, and longer filter cycles are claimed by W.R. Grace for their TrySyl® product.24
Fats and Oils Processing
97
A second bleaching option adds the silica separate from the bleaching clay, which is precoated on the filter press. The silica collapses in the bleaching vessel, trapping the contaminants to preserve the clay for color pigment removal. An 80% reduction in bleaching earth is claimed for this enhanced silica option. The modified causticrefining procedure eliminates the need for a water-wash centrifuge. The high soap and gum adsorption capacity of the silica replaces the water-wash procedure. The usual washing process produces a high biological oxygen demand effluent as well as a loss of oil. About 0.05% of the oil washed is lost in the wastewater. Also, disposal of wastewater from conventional washing of alkali-refined oils presents a problem to processors because of increasingly stringent laws regarding oil refinery effluents. The water-washing step may be eliminated by using 0.05 to 0.4% silica hydrogels to absorb residual soap and trace metals from the refined oil. The silica material has a higher ability to absorb soap, secondary oxidation products, and phospholipids than do traditional bleaching clays. The spent silica is removed by filtration before the oil is bleached. Bleaching with clay is still required to remove the color pigments and other impurities; however, the bleaching-earth usage has been reduced 40 to 80% in some operations.24 A process using sodium silicate to replace sodium hydroxide in chemical refining has been developed at Texas A&M (College Station). Sodium silicate reacts with the nontriglycerides to form a silica hydrogel that is filterable, but cannot be centrifuged with current equipment. Conversely, the soaps produced with sodium hydroxide are not filterable, but can be centrifuged for separation. Degumming of the oil prior to refining is a prerequisite for this modified process to reduce the quantity of gums absorbed by the sodium silica.38 2.6.5 Refining Efficiency Refining efficiency is generally considered to be the yield of dry neutral-refined oil as a percentage of the available neutral-oil content of the crude oil. The dry neutral oil is determined by actual weight in a scale tank or volumetric measurement with adjustments as indicated by the specific gravity or temperature of the product. The crude neutral-oil content is supplied by the laboratory analysis of the incoming crude oil samples or preferably analysis of the feedstock to the refining system. The refining efficiency is expressed as the ratio of neutral oil produced over the analyzed neutral oil in the crude oil, for example:
Refining efficiency =
Refined-oil yield × 100 Crude neutral-oil analysis
The specified laboratory loss analysis by trading rules varies with the source oil, which affects the refining efficiency results. Gum-containing crude oils, such as soybean and canola, are usually evaluated by the chromatographic method for neutral oil (American Oil Chemists’ Society [AOCS] Method Ca 9f-57),39 and the refining efficiency is expressed as the ratio of neutral oil produced to the laboratory-
98
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
determined neutral oil in the crude oil. Corn and cottonseed oils trading rules specify AOCS Method Ca 9a-52,34 and the refining efficiency is expressed as savings over cup (laboratory loss) and determined with the following equation:
Savings over cup =
% Cup loss − % Plant loss % Cup loss × 100
It is customary in Europe to monitor refining efficiency with the refining factor, which is the total loss divided by the fatty acid of the crude oil before refining. This factor permits a direct comparison of the refining efficiency of oils with different FFA starting levels. The refining factor can present a false impression when the amount of gums and other impurities is high in proportion to the FFA content. Experience in European facilities, with all types of properly filtered and degummed oils, shows that the refining factor varies between 1.4 and 1.7.32 In the United States, lauric and palm oils are refined against free fatty acid, and the efficiency control is measured with the refining factor. The equation for determining the refining factor is36
Refining factor =
% Plant loss % Free fatty acid
2.6.6 Refining Byproducts Crude oils contain a number of materials that must be removed to produce neutral, light-colored oils. These impurities have been considered waste products constituting a disposal problem; however, they can be valuable byproducts when effectively recovered and processed. The two major byproducts from the refining processes are soapstock from chemical refining and hydrated gums from the degumming process prior to caustic refining or the physical refining pretreatment stage. 2.6.6.1 Soapstock Processing Soapstock from alkali refining is a source of fatty acids, but it also presents a handling, storage, and disposal problem. Originally, many years ago, the caustic refining byproducts were merely discarded. Then, it became a valuable source of fatty acids for the soapmaker and the fatty acid distiller. Soapstock was shipped from the refiner in the raw form as it was separated from the neutral oil. The growth of synthetic detergents over soaps reduced this market for soapstock considerably and, in the fatty acid field, soapstock utilization was replaced with tall oil, a byproduct of the paper industry. These changes turned edible-oil refiners to soapstock acidulation to produce acid oil, which is used as a high-energy ingredient in feeds or provides a more refined product for chemical use.40 Batch acidulation of the raw soapstock discharged from the caustic refining centrifuges consists of three basic steps:41
Fats and Oils Processing
99
1. Acidification with 66°Bé sulfuric acid of the highly basic, diluted soapstock to convert the soap into FFA; the acid level required varies with the amount of caustic used in refining to adjust the pH to 1.5 to 2.0. 2. Breaking the emulsion of fatty acids and foreign materials in water with heat at ~195°F or 90°C with agitation. 3. Separation of the three phases: a. Top layer: Fatty acid product is recovered and transported to storage. b. Middle layer: This material, which consists of an emulsion of the top- and bottom-layer material, must be recycled for reprocessing. c. Bottom layer: The acidified wastewater is removed, neutralized, and disposed of in the wastewater system.
The problems associated with acidulation of soapstock are mainly the corrosive nature of the process and the fact that the separation of the acid oil phase from the acid water phase is often relatively poor, which leads to high fat losses and wastewater contamination with fatty material. Federal, state, and municipal legislation enacted for pollution abatement mandated more effective processes for clarification of acid water streams from acidulation. Continuous acidulation of soapstock and wash water as it is discharged from the refinery has provided a byproduct of acid oil with the required quality standards and an acid wastewater with fewer, more manageable contaminants. Soapstock should be processed as soon as possible after it is produced to minimize fermentation and emulsification. Several different continuous acidulation systems of varying designs are available. The major reason for acidulating soapstock is to remove moisture so that a smaller volume is obtained for handling or storage. Acid oil is essentially the fatty portion of soapstock with the moisture content reduced to 1.0 or 2.0%. It is traded on a total fatty acid (TFA) basis of 95%, and shipments can be rejected if the TFA falls below 85%. The impurities originally in the crude oil, such as phosphatides, carbohydrates, proteins, pigments, sterols, or heavy metals, are transferred in part or in full to the soapstock during refining and then to the acid oil with acidulation. A technique of using potassium hydroxide instead of sodium hydroxide as a caustic refining agent can increase the byproduct utilization. This patented process (Daniels) allows acidulation of the soapstock and then using the water effluent for fertilizer production.27 Probably the greatest volume usage for acidulated soapstock is for animal feeds. Acid oils have become one of the essential components in many animal feeds. They are high-energy ingredients that provide nine calories per gram when metabolized as compared to four calories per gram from starch or protein. Acid oils act as carriers and protectors for several fat-soluble vitamins and antioxidants and are an excellent source of polyunsaturates in most cases. The main competition for the formulated animal feeds is corn, which provides 3.5 calories per gram; therefore, acid oils cannot cost more than 2.6 times the price of corn to be economically competitive. Two potential problems for this application of acid oil are (1) residual sulfuric acid and its reaction products decrease the palatability to most animals, and (2) deodorizer distillates cannot be a component of the acid oil because of the pesticide contents.42
100
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
An alternative to soapstock acidulation has been used on a limited basis — a neutralized dried soapstock process. This alternative process, which converts the soapstock to a neutral pH followed by drum drying, produces a product that has performed well as a fat source in feeds for chickens and cattle, and the only effluent is evaporated water.43 This process reduces the load on a plant wastewater treatment facility more than any of the alternatives except for shipping raw soapstock. 2.6.6.2 Hydrated Gums Processing Lecithin is the preferred outlet for the hydrated gums recovered from water degumming. Commercial lecithin is one of the most important byproducts of the edible-oil processing industry because of its functionality and wide application in food systems and industrial utility; however, the gums hydrated from soybean oil alone far exceed the market requirements for lecithin. Estimates are that less than one third of the soybean oil processed will satisfy the lecithin demands. Another outlet available to the crusher/refiner is to incorporate the recovered gums back into the meal produced. For some operations, this alternative solves a meal-dusting problem as well as adding value to the gums. Lecithin is the commercial name for a naturally occurring surface-active agent made up of a mixture of phospholipids. It can be obtained from a number of vegetable oils, but the major source is soybean oil phospholipids or gums, which provide excellent emulsification properties with good flavor and color. Lecithin production starts with degumming the crude oil with approximately 2% steam or water added during slow agitation to hydrate the lecithin. The hydrated gums are separated from the crude oil and dried carefully to below 1.0% moisture to avoid damaging the color. After cooling, ingredients are added to the lecithin to meet the desired specification limits. Soybean oil and fatty acid additions are used to control acetone-insoluble matter, acid value, and viscosity. Lecithin can be chemically bleached with hydrogen peroxide, either before or after drying, to control the color. The National Soybean Processors Association rules define six common grades of lecithin. In addition, a variety of modified lecithins can be produced for specialty uses.44 The crude-oil degumming process affects the quality and performance of lecithin products. For example, most additives used to aid degumming are usually deleterious to the lecithin, except for acetic anhydride and enzymes. Other additives, such as phosphoric acid, tend to burn and darken the lecithin on drying and pollute water streams. Oxalic acid does not pollute,45 but it does render lecithin toxic, and inorganic salts affect the physical and functional properties.46 The acid-degummed lecithins have also exhibited poor functionality (i.e., inferior instantizing properties in cocoa powders and milk products).47 2.7 PREBLEACHING The purpose of bleaching is not only to provide lighter colored oil, but also to purify it in preparation for further processing. Refined oil contains traces of a number
Fats and Oils Processing
101
of undesirable impurities either in solution or as colloidal suspensions. These impurities compete with the color pigments for space on the adsorbent surface. In many cases, the bleaching process is performed more for the removal of the nonpigment materials, such as soap, gums, and prooxidant metals, which hinder filtration, poison hydrogenation catalyst, darken the oils, and affect finished oil flavor. Another function considered primary by many quality processors is the removal of peroxides and secondary oxidation products. The key parameters for the bleaching process are (1) procedure, (2) adsorbent type and dosage, (3) temperature, (4) time, (5) moisture, and (6) filtration. Each variable must be considered in light of the system used and the oil to be bleached.11,48-53 2.7.1 Procedure The three most common types of contact bleaching methods used for edible fats and oils are batch atmospheric, batch vacuum, and continuous vacuum. This sequence is also the chronological order in which the different methods were developed. Figure 2.5 diagrams the process flow for the three types of bleaching systems. 2.7.1.1 Batch Atmospheric Oil at approximately 160°F (71°C) is pumped into an open-top tank equipped with steam coils, or a steam jacket, and a paddle agitator. Bleaching earth is added from the top of the tank with the agitator running; the temperature is raised to bleaching temperature and maintained for a short time. Next, the oil is recirculated through a filter press and back to the bleaching vessel until the oil is clear, then it is pumped to storage. 2.7.1.2 Batch Vacuum Bleaching earth is added to an agitated slurry tank containing a small portion of the refined oil at 160°F (71°C). This slurry is transferred to the vacuum bleacher, which contains the balance of the oil batch. The bleaching vessel is equipped with coils or a steam jacket, an agitator, and a vacuum system. After the prescribed time at bleaching temperature under vacuum, the bleached oil batch is cooled to 160°F (71°C), the vacuum is broken, and the oil is filtered. 2.7.1.3 Continuous Vacuum Bleaching clay is continuously fed into a stream of oil at 160°F (71°C), and this mixture is sprayed into a vacuum chamber to remove both water and air from the clay and the oil. The product temperature is raised to bleaching temperature with a heat exchanger and then sprayed into a second chamber for bleaching. After the bleaching retention time, it is filtered in a closed-type filter and cooled before the vacuum is broken.
102
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Atmospheric Batch
Vacuum Batch
Refined Oil 160°F Bleaching Earth 0.15 to 3.0%
Bleaching Earth 0.15 to 3.0%
Bleaching Vessel 160 to 230°F 15 to 20 min
Earth Slurry Tank
Filter
Filter Aid Precoat and Body Feed
Filter Aid Precoat and Body Feed Spent Earth
Refined Oil 160°F Vacuum Bleaching 50mm Hg 160 to 230°F 15 to 20 min
Filter
Cooler 120 to 130°F
Cooler 120 to 130°F
Bleached Oil
Bleached Oil
Spent Earth
Continuous Vacuum Refined Oil 130°F Bleaching Earth Feeder
Bleaching Earth Mix Tank
Vacuum Deaeration 130°F 7 minutes
Heater 220 to 240°F
Filter
Vacuum Bleaching Section 230°F 10 minutes
Cooler 120 to 130°F
Spent Earth
Bleached Oil
Figure 2.5 Typical bleaching process flow sequence.
The use of activated clays and higher-temperature bleaching led to the need for protection from atmospheric oxidation, which is provided by the vacuum-bleaching process. Oxidative reactions during atmospheric bleaching cause a fading of some color pigments to lighten the color, but also the formation of new nonabsorbent colors and fixation of other colors that darken the oil instead of lightening it. New color formation is believed to be the result of oxidation of red chroman-5,6-quinones from tocopherol, which does not respond to adsorption. Vacuum bleaching is more effective than atmospheric bleaching because it can use less clay, operates at lower bleaching temperatures, effects quicker moisture evacuation for less free fatty acid development from hydrolysis, and does not expose the oil to oxidation at high temperatures. Many versions of the bleaching process are in use; however, most edibleoil processors will prebleach with a continuous vacuum type of system. Continuous bleaching is preferable because large volumes can be processed without interruptions
Fats and Oils Processing
103
to empty and refill the bleacher, and the process conditions can be adjusted as the operation progresses.53 2.7.2 Bleaching Agents Chemical agents have been used or proposed for use, but practically all edibleoil decoloration and purification is accomplished with adsorptive clays, synthetic silica, and carbons. The basic kinds of adsorbents used in edible-oil bleaching are natural bleaching earth, activated bleaching earths, activated carbon, and synthetic amorphous silica. 2.7.2.1 Natural Bleaching Earth Bentonite clays that exhibit absorptive properties in their natural state are classified as natural bleaching earths, or Fuller’s earth. Molecular lattice structure, macropore structure, and particle size all affect the capacity of earths to adsorb water, oil, phosphatides, soap, color bodies, and metals. The better natural earths can absorb 15% of their own weight in pigments and other impurities, but also retain about 30% neutral oil. Natural clays perform best with atmospheric bleaching and are employed for easily bleached oils, such as coconut, lard, and tallow. The natural earths do not elevate the free fatty acid content nor isomerize unsaturated fatty acid groups; however, for dark or difficult to absorb pigments or impurities, prohibitive levels of the natural earths are required, which make the activated materials more attractive. 2.7.2.2 Activated Bleaching Earth Bentonite clays are also used to produce activated bleaching earths, but the clays are a type that contains a high proportion of montmorillonite. This hydrous aluminum silicate has considerable capacity for exchanging part of the aluminum for magnesium, alkalis, and other bases. Interestingly, most bentonites that exhibit high natural bleaching power are not suitable for activation, and most clays used for activated clay products have a poor natural bleaching activity. Treatment, to varying degrees, with sulfuric or hydrochloric acid, washing, drying, and milling alter the bleaching media’s degree of acidity, adsorption capabilities, and particle size distribution.49 The acid treatment of montmorillonite clay produces a specialty adsorbent from a naturally occurring mineral. During this process, the physical structure and chemical composition are altered in a controlled way to maximize specific properties. An efficient bleaching earth is produced with a surface of the correct chemical composition and pore distribution selectively attractive to the detrimental components of the refined oils. Particle size is also a major physical parameter affecting bleaching earth performance, as all adsorption theory considers adsorption as a surface phenomena. In general, the finest particle size clays have the best bleaching power, but particles that are too small create severe filtration problems and oil retention is increased. Therefore, the adsorbent used should have as small a particle size as can be effectively
104
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
handled by the filter system. In practice, a compromise particle size provides acceptable filtration performance and minimizes oil loss without diminishing bleaching performance.50 Activated bleaching earths normally contain 10 to 18% moisture, which supports the montmorillonite layers in the clays. If the clay is completely dried prior to bleaching, the layers collapse to decrease the surface area available to adsorb the pigments and other impurities. Apparent bulk density (weight per unit volume) is dependent on the amount of void space in the clay — the more void space, the lower the density. Activated clays have a lower bulk density than do natural clays for increased oil retention. The increased void space and total surface area can retain as much as 70% of the bleaching earths, weight in oil; however, lower activated clay usage level requirements normally result in a lower overall bleached oil loss with a lower bleach color and increased impurity removal.11 The activated bleaching earths are more likely to split soap residues to elevate FFA, destroy peroxides and secondary oxidation products, and promote isomerization. The latter effect is more pronounced at temperatures above 300°F (150°C), which is well above the optimum bleaching conditions. The modified bleaching earths are especially useful for bleaching the most difficult oils, such as palm, soybean, and canola, or as part of the physical refining pretreatment process for the removal of metals and phosphatides. 2.7.2.3 Reuse Spent Bleaching Earth It has long been known that the used bleaching earth discharged from the filters is still active. Several methods for the use of spent bleaching earth have been devised. One procedure utilizes two filtration steps. First, the oil to be bleached is passed through a filter that has already been used and filled to capacity with bleaching earth. The prefiltered oil is then bleached and refiltered. The prefiltering step with spent earth can reduce the active bleaching earth usage by as much as 50%.27 2.7.2.4 Activated Carbon A wide variety of carbonaceous raw materials can be used to form activated carbon by carbonization at high temperatures, combined with the use of activating materials, such as phosphoric acid, metal salts, etc. The treated material is washed, dried, and ground to produce activated carbons of various pore sizes, internal specific surface areas, and alkalinity or acidity. Activity is determined by the chemical state and a large specific surface area. Most processors use carbon sparingly due to problems with filtration, relatively high cost, and high oil retention; carbon can retain up to 150% of its weight of oil. When utilized, it is normally added in combination with bleaching earths at 5 to 10% of the earth volume. Carbon is effective in adsorbing certain impurities not affected by earths, for example, some aromatic materials that are not volatilized by deodorization can be satisfactorily removed with activated carbon.51
Fats and Oils Processing
105
2.7.2.5 Silica Adsorbent Silica is a chemically inert synthetic amorphous silica adsorbent with an affinity for polar contaminants. The surface area, porosity, and moisture content of the silica adsorbents provide them the capability of adsorbing secondary oxidation products (aldehydes, ketones), phosphatidic compounds, sulfur compounds, trace metals, and soap. The function of the moisture is to hold the pores open and aid in the attraction of the polar contaminants. Most of the synthetic silicas do not have significant direct adsorption capabilities for carotenoid or chlorophyll compounds, but the removal of the other impurities enhances the efficiency of the bleaching earths.19 Water washing with long-mix refining can be eliminated with the use of soap-adsorbing silica in bleaching. Special silica adsorbents specifically target soaps, phosphatides, and trace metals. The silica is introduced prior to adding the bleaching earth. This usage also reduces the amount of bleaching earth required for the removal of color bodies.27 2.7.3 Bleaching Earth Dosage The amount of bleaching earth used depends on the type of absorbent used and the type of refined oil, as well as the adsorption of color bodies and other impurities required. The percentage of clays used varies in a wide range from 0.15 to 3.0%, and only in extreme cases are higher quantities used.52 Use of acid-treated or activated earths far exceeds that of natural clays due to the higher bleaching efficiency, particularly with dark or high chlorophyll oils. On the basis of adsorbent activity, the acid-activated clays are generally 1.5 to 2 times more effective as bleaching agents than are the natural earths. The efficiency of an absorbent is measured by the minimum dose required to reduce the concentration of adsorbent to the required level. Therefore, the kind and amount of earth or carbon used need only be enough to clean up the oil preparatory to hydrogenation or deodorization and to remove any undesirable impurities and pigments that will not be removed in later processing. The minimum required bleach is usually best as overbleaching increases oil losses and can lead to flavor, oxidative, and even color instability. The removal of color pigments is a common, simple visual guide, often used to gauge the overall performance and adjust levels required of a bleaching earth; however, the ability to remove other undesirable impurities is less readily apparent. The choice of the correct bleaching earth and the level to use in any specific application must take into consideration the removal of all the impurities as measured by peroxide value reduced to zero, chlorophyll reduced to less than 30 ppb for soybean and canola oils, phosphorus reduced to less than 1.0 ppm, negative soap, and the Lovibond red determined for the specific source oil. The bleaching step in fats and oils processing has benefited in recent years from increased interest in physical refining due to the development of different ways to improve the removal of the nontriglyceride materials. One such development has been the introduction of the use of synthetic silica as part of the adsorption process. It is particularly recommended for use with, and preferably before, the bleachingearth treatment. It has been found to have an affinity for the compounds that reduce
106
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
the efficacy of bleaching earths. Several different options are offered for the use of silica adsorbents. The simplest option adds silica adsorbent (~0.2%) with the bleaching earth prior to bleaching to reduce the clay usage. A 40% reduction in bleaching earth usage, less neutral oil loss, and longer filter cycles are claimed by W.R. Grace for their TrySyl® product. A second bleaching option adds the silica separate from the bleaching clay, which is precoated on the filter press. The silica collapses in the bleaching vessel, thus trapping the contaminants to preserve the clay for color pigment removal. Another option is the removal of the silica adsorbent with a filter that has been filled to capacity with spent bleaching earth.27 An 80% reduction in bleaching earth is claimed with this enhanced silica option.24 2.7.4 Temperature Both the synthetic silicas and bleaching earths should be slurried with the oil at relatively low temperatures (158°F or 70°C), and then the complete mixture is increased to the final bleach temperature (194 to 212°F or 90 to 100°C). Experience has shown that final bleach colors are darker when the adsorbents are added to hot oil. Evidently, this effect is due to one or both of the following two factors:
1. Adding the adsorbent to hot oil reduces its adsorptive capacity because the moisture is driven off too rapidly causing a collapse of the lattice structure, which reduces the effective surface area to adsorb impurities and pigments.11 2. The oil is unprotected against oxidation when heated before the adsorbent is added, which can cause some color fixation or set.53
Bleaching clay activity increases as the temperature is increased by reducing the viscosity of the oil, but decoloration declines after the optimum temperature has been reached and color fixation occurs. The optimum earth–oil contact temperature is dependent on the oil type and the type of bleaching system. Temperature requirements for vacuum bleaching systems are normally lower than those for atmospheric bleaching to reach optimum color removal. Temperature also affects other properties of the oil, so it should be kept as low as possible to minimize product damage, but high enough for adequate adsorbance of the impurities and color pigments.53 Production of an oil with acceptable oxidative stability requires careful control of the process temperatures. Few problems are encountered when the bleaching temperatures remain below 230°F (110°C) and steps are taken to control air oxidation. Anisidine values begin to rise with bleaching temperatures above 230°F (110°C), indicating damage to the oxidative stability. The optimum bleaching temperatures of nearly all edible oils range between 160 and 230°F (70 to 110°C). The activity of an absorbent in bleaching an edible fat or oil is at a maximum at some particular temperature that varies with oil type and process. Low temperatures favor the retention of the adsorbed pigment on the bleaching media surface, while higher temperatures favor movement into the pores where chemisorption is most likely, which promotes structural changes in the unsaturated fatty acid groups. Extremely high-temperature
Fats and Oils Processing
107
processing must be avoided to prevent isomerization of the unsaturated fatty acid groups and excessive FFA development.54 2.7.5 Time In theory, adsorption should be practically instantaneous; however, in practice, this is not the case. The rate of color decrease is very rapid during the first few minutes that the adsorbent is in contact with the oil and then decreases to a point where equilibrium is reached and no more color is removed. Time is required for the adsorbent to release all of the bound moisture and take up the color pigments and impurities to maximum capacity. Usually, a contact time of 15 to 20 minutes is adequate at a bleaching temperature above the boiling point of water.54 The usual error is to extend bleaching time beyond the optimum.51 Contact time for bleaching is made up of two time periods: (1) the time in the bleaching vessel or continuous stream, and (2) the contact time in the filter during recirculation or final filtering.55,56 Continued or progressive reduction in peroxides and the other impurities as filtering continues is caused by press effect, a benefit provided by the earth buildup in the filter with continued use. Some processors take advantage of this effect by decreasing the level of earth used in oils to be filtered with partly filled filters. When silica is used, it is recommended that it be added to the oil first, with strong agitation and vacuum for 15 minutes, before the bleaching earth is introduced. During this time, the silica should adsorb soaps, secondary oxidation products, phosphatides, and trace metals, which normally compete with the color pigments for space on the bleaching earth surface. The absence of these impurities increases the efficiency of the bleaching earths to adsorb the chlorophylloid and carotenoid pigments. Experience has also indicated that the press effect may be more effective than the normal bleaching earth and oil mixing with the use of the synthetic silicas. W.R. Grace has advocated the use of packed bed filtration to take advantage of the press effect.24 2.7.6 Moisture The presence of some moisture seems to be essential for good adsorbance and bleaching action. Bleaching earths that have been completely dried before use have been found to be inactive. The adsorbents normally contain from 10 to 18% moisture, which acts as a structural support to keep the montmorillonite layers apart. During bleaching, it is necessary to remove the moisture in the adsorbent to obtain optimum adsorption capacity; the color bodies and other impurities cannot be adsorbed to maximum capacity until all the water has been removed. The bound moisture is not released until the elevated bleaching temperatures are attained.11 Refined oil can contain moisture levels from less than 0.1 to as high as 1.0%, which must also be removed for effective adsorption of the traces of soap remaining after refining. Experience has indicated that a slightly wet oil may be beneficial for the removal of color pigments and flavor precursors to provide a lighter, more stable oil. Maximum
108
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
adsorption is achieved when the silicas and bleaching earth are slurried with the oil below the boiling point of water, then gradually increasing the mix to bleaching temperature. Adding the bleaching earth before heating the oil has also been found to inhibit heat darkening. 2.7.7 Filtration After an adsorbent has selectively captured the impurities, it must be removed from the oil before it becomes a catalyst for color development or other undesirable reactions. Filtration, the separation method most often used for spent bleaching earth removal, is the process of passing a fluid through a permeable filter material to separate particles from the fluid. Examples of the filtration materials utilized include filter paper, filter cloth, filter screen, and membranes. Filter aids, such as diatomite, perlite, or cellulose are usually used in conjunction with the permeable filters for surface protection. The three steps of filtration are precoating, filtering, and cleaning. The purpose of the precoat is to protect the filter screens, provide immediate clarity, improve the flow rate, and aid in filter cake removal during cleaning. It also helps to prevent blinding, which stops the product flow. Precoating is accomplished by slurring filter aid with previously filtered oil and allowing the oil to carry the filter aid to the filter, deposit it on the filter screen, and return to the precoat slurry tank to pick up more filter aid. The filter area, usually 5 to 11 kg/m2 , is determined by the amount of precoat. The flow rate during precoating should be the same as during filtration to obtain an even coating on the filter. Uneven coatings results in blinded filters and short filtration cycles. During filtration, body feed, or the continuous addition of filter aid, can be used to help prevent blinding of the suspended solids on the precoat. The body feed surrounds the suspended solids to provide flow around them. The body feed slurry of filter aid and oil is injected into the system prior to the filter. The suspended solids are ridged or deformable and can elongate under pressure to extrude through the filter cake and slow or block the product flow. Body feed will coat the deformed solids, allowing them to be retained on the filter cake. Several indicators are utilized to determine the point at which the filter space has been filled with solids from the bleached oil: when the pressure drop across the leaves reaches a predetermined level, when a predetermined decrease in flow rate occurs, or when a calculated load level is reached. Short cycles or premature filter stoppages are usually the result of:
1. Inadequate body feed 2. Too high flow rate, which can cause the solids to pack 3. Too low flow rate, which can allow the solids to settle and block the flow rate 4. Blinded screens, which reduce the filter surface area 5. Solid load exceeding filter capacity
The perfect circumstance is when the differential pressure is reached and the flow rate is severely reduced at the same time that the calculated filter capacity is
Fats and Oils Processing
109
exhausted. Once the filter cycle is complete, the filter cake must be removed and the process repeated all over again.57 Traditionally, either plate and frame filters or pressure leaf filters have been used for bleach clay removal. The sequence of change in usage was approximately as follows: plate and frame filters, pressure leaf filters, self-cleaning closed filters, and automated filters. Pressure leaf filters began to replace plate and frame presses for several reasons. One of the major reasons was that the leaf filters were easier to clean than the plate and frame presses, and labor costs were less. Labor costs have been the impetus for more complete automation of the bleaching operations and all the other processes. Currently, completely self-cleaning closed filters that operate on an automated cycle are available.58 2.7.8 Bleaching Byproduct The spent bleaching earth removed from the bleached oil with filters represents a substantial amount of waste material. The most common handling procedure is to discard spent bleaching earth directly from the filters to a landfill. The spent bleaching earth oxidizes rapidly when exposed to the air to develop a strong odor, and spontaneous combustion easily occurs, especially with oils high in polyunsaturates. Therefore, the spent bleaching earth must be covered with soil or sand soon after dumping. The oil content of the spent bleaching earth may range from 25 to 75% of the weight of the earth. Oil retention is affected by the type of filters, the type of refined oil bleached, and the degree of color reduction. It is important to recover as much of this oil as possible, but methods that are too efficient may cause desorption of the impurities adsorbed by the bleaching earth from the refined oil. Because it is possible to remove a substantial portion of the oil from the spent earth, it may become a legal requirement in the future. Oil can be recovered by several methods, some performed on the cake while it is still in the filter and others after it has been removed from the filter. Some of the procedures for oil recovery include:54,59,60,61 • Cake steaming: Blowing steam through the cake in the filter can reduce the oil content to as low as 20%; however, the oil content should not be reduced below 25% because the steam wetting may cause desorption of the impurities below this point to lower the quality of the recovered oil. Also, spent earth with low oil content oxidizes more rapidly when exposed to the atmosphere. • Hot water extraction: Circulation of hot water at 200°F (95°C) through the filter cake while maintaining a pressure of 5 atm at a rapid flow rate can displace as much as 55 to 70% of the oil for collection and separation. Washing time may be extended to 30 minutes, but 90% of the recoverable oil is obtained in the first 10 minutes. After water washing, the filter cake may be partially dried with steam. Drying with air can cause the filter to catch on fire, especially when oils high in unsaturates are processed. • Solvent extraction: Organic solvents can be used to extract the oil from the filter cake in certain enclosed filters as a separate process. Hexane, a nonpolar solvent, has performed well, but strong polar solvents, such as acetone or trichloroethylene, may also recover the impurities separated from the refined oil. Solvent extraction
110
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
provides oil yields of over 95% with a quality comparable to the originally filtered oil. Explosion-proof environments, buildings, and equipment, which are quite expensive, are required for solvent extraction. In most cases, the less efficient hot water extraction will be more practical than solvent extraction, and it may be feasible only for very large processing facilities that generate large quantities of spent earth. • Solvent extraction with oilseeds: Extraction of the bleaching earths in a mixture with oilseeds has been practiced by some extraction plants with processing capabilities, but the potential problems for this type of recovery may outweigh the savings. For example, the mineral content of the meal may be increased beyond the acceptable limits, and the recovered oil may decrease the quality of the new oil extracted. The oxidation products and polymers from the recovered oil could contaminate the fresh oil. • Water/lye extraction: Oil can be extracted from the spent bleaching earth by suspending it in double the amount of water and boiling with a concentrated lye. The oil accumulates on the surface of the slurry for recovery. The remaining slurry can be centrifuged with separations as high as 85% efficiency. The separated bleaching clay has a light gray color, is almost odorless, and does not ignite spontaneously. It can be used as a landfill material to cover other refuse instead of requiring the use of soil or sand. The procedure is simple and relatively inexpensive, but a darkcolored, low-quality oil suitable only for technical purposes or possibly cattle feed is obtained.
2.8 HYDROGENATION In the United States and northern Europe, animal fats in the form of butter, lard, and tallow were the major source of edible fats until development of the hydrogenation process. This process made it possible for vegetable oils to be converted into plastic fat forms that people were accustomed to, with greater flavor stability at a lower cost. From the time that the British patent on liquid-phase hydrogenation was issued to W. Norman in 1903 and its introduction in the United States in 1911, few chemical processes made as great an economic impact on any industry. Hydrogenation opened new markets for vegetable oil processing and provided the means for the development of many specialty fats and oils products. Oil is hydrogenated for two reasons. One reason is to change naturally occurring fats and oils into physical forms with the consistency and handling characteristics required for functionality. Hydrogenated edible fats and oils products can be prepared with creaming properties, frying stability, sharp melting properties, and the other functional characteristics desired for specific applications. The second reason for hydrogenation is to increase oxidative stability. Flavor stability is necessary to maintain product acceptability for prolonged periods after processing and packaging and for use as an ingredient in a finished product. A wide range of fats and oils products can be produced with the hydrogenation process depending on the conditions used, the starting oils, and the degree of saturation or isomerization. Liquid-phase, catalytic hydrogenation is one of the most important and complex chemical reactions carried out in the processing of edible fats and oils.60-65 Most
Fats and Oils Processing
111
chemistry textbooks describe hydrogenation of oils as a simple saturation of double bonds in an unsaturated fat with hydrogen, using nickel as a catalyst. Actually, that is only one of several very complex reactions during hydrogenation. The products of hydrogenation are a very complex mixture because of the simultaneous reactions that occur: (1) saturation of double bonds, (2) cis-/trans-isomerization of double bonds, and (3) shifts of double-bond locations, usually to the lower energy conjugated state. Chemically, fats and oils are a combination of glycerin and fatty acids called triglycerides. The portions of triglycerides that can be changed with hydrogenation are classified as unsaturated fatty acids. Saturated fatty acids contain only single carbonto-carbon bonds and are the least reactive chemically. Physically, they have higher melting points and are solid at room temperature. Unsaturated fatty acids contain one or more carbon-to-carbon double bonds and are liquid at room temperature with substantially lower melting points than their saturated fatty acid counterparts. In the process of hydrogenation, it is possible to chemically react hydrogen gas with the double bonds in the carbon chain of the unsaturated fatty acid, converting it to a more saturated fatty acid, shifting it to a new position, or twisting it to the trans configuration, all of which increase its melting point. Table 2.2 illustrates the chemical structure of the natural 18 carbon fatty acids and the changes possible with hydrogenation. Hydrogenation can take place only when the three reactants have been brought together: unsaturated oil, a catalyst, and hydrogen gas. The hydrogen gas must be dissolved in the liquid oil before it can diffuse through the liquid to the solid catalyst surface. Each absorbed unsaturated fatty acid can then react with a hydrogen atom to complete the saturation of the double bond, shift it to a new position, or twist it to a higher melting trans form. Both positional and geometric or trans-isomers are very important to the production of partially hydrogenated fats. If the unsaturated oil to hydrogenation contains mono-, di-, and triunsaturates, there may be competition for the catalyst surface. The di- and triunsaturates are preferentially absorbed and partially isomerized or hydrogenated to a monounsaturate until their concentration is very low, permitting the monounsaturate to be absorbed and reacted. Achievement of the desired hydrogenated oil product is usually measured with the solids fat index (SFI) or solids fat content (SFC), either of which measures the amount of solids present in a fat at different temperatures from below room temperature to above body temperature. Natural fats are not single compounds, and the hydrogenated products are even more complex mixtures due to the simultaneous reactions. Not only are double bonds saturated with hydrogen, but some of the remaining bonds are isomerized: Geometric isomerization changes the low-melting cis form to a higher melting trans form, and positional isomers shift the double bond away from its natural position in the carbon chain. Extensive geometrical or trans-isomerization tends to produce products that are hard at low temperatures but soft at high temperatures, which results in steep SFI curves. A lesser but significant effect on melting points is contributed by the positional isomerization, as the shift of a double bond in a carbon chain affects the melting point of the hydrogenated oil. Additionally, the bonds that are shifted can be in either the cis or trans form, which further substantiates the complexity of the hydrogenated oil process.
112
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 2.2 Fatty Acid Structures Linolenic Fatty Acid (C-18:3) Melting Point –13°C (8.6°F) H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | H – C – C – C = C – C – C = C – C – C – C – C – C – C – C – C – C – C – C – OH | | | | | | | | | | | H H H H H H H H H H H 18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
cis,cis,cis isomer triunsaturate
omega-3
Linoleic Fatty Acid (C-18:2) Melting Point –6.5°C (20.3°F) H | H– C – | H 18
H | C– | H 17
H | C– | H 16
H | C– | H 15
H | C– | H 14
H H H | | | C= C– C– | H 13 12 11
H H H | | | C= C– C– | H 10 9 8
H H H H H H O | | | | | | | C – C – C – C – C – C – C – OH | | | | | | | H H H H H H H 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
cis,cis isomer diunsaturate
omega-6
Oleic Fatty Acid (C-18:1) Melting Point 13.4°C (56.1°F) H | H– C – | H 18
H | C– | H 17
H | C– | H 16
H | C– | H 15
H | C– | H 14
H | C– | H 13
H | C– | H 12
H | C– | H 11
H H H | | | C= C– C– | H 10 9 8
H H H H H H O | | | | | | | C – C – C – C – C – C – C – OH | | | | | | H H H H H H 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
cis isomer monounsaturate
omega-9
Elaidic Fatty Acid (C-18:1) Melting Point 43.7°C (110.7°F) H | H– C – | H 18
H | C– | H 17
H | C– | H 16
H | C– | H 15
H | C– | H 14
H | C– | H 13
H | C– | H 12
H | C– | H 11
H H | | C= C– C– | | H H 10 9 8
H H H H H H O | | | | | | | C – C – C – C – C – C – C – OH | | | | | | H H H H H H 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
trans isomer monounsaturate
Petroselinic Fatty Acid (C-18:1) Melting Point 30°C (86°F) H | H– C – | H 18
H | C– | H 17
H | C– | H 16
H | C– | H 15
H | C– | H 14
H H H | | | C= C– C– | H 13 12 11
H | C– | H 10
H H H H H H H H O positional cis isomer | | | | | | | | | C – C – C – C – C – C – C – C – C – OH monounsaturate | | | | | | | | | H H H H H H H H 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Stearic Fatty Acid (C-18:0) Melting Point 69.6°C (157.3°C) H | H– C – | H 18
H | C– | H 17
H | C– | H 16
H | C– | H 15
H | C– | H 14
H | C– | H 13
H | C– | H 12
H | C– | H 11
H | C– | H 10
H H H H H H H H O | | | | | | | | | C – C – C – C – C – C – C – C – C – OH | | | | | | | | H H H H H H H H 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
saturate
Selective hydrogenation is the tool by which partial hydrogenation can be accomplished in a controlled manner. Selectivity is the saturation with hydrogen of the double bonds in the most unsaturated fatty acid before that of a less unsaturated fatty acid. In a theoretical sense, an oil hardened with perfect preferential selectivity would first have all of its linolenic fatty acids (C-18:3) reduced to linoleic fatty acids (C-18:2) before any linoleic was reduced to oleic (C-18:1); then, all linoleic fatty
Fats and Oils Processing
113
acids would be reduced to oleic before any oleic was saturated to stearic (C-18:0). Unfortunately, this does not happen in actual practice, but it is possible to vary the hydrogenation rate of linoleic to that of oleic from the very selective conditions of 50 to 1 to the less selective conditions of 4 linoleic to 1 oleic. The latter is generally described as nonselective. Formation of the high-melting unsaturated fats or isomerization accompanies hydrogenation and appears to be in proportion to the selectivity of the reaction. Therefore, compromises must be made between selectivity and isomer formation when determining the best hydrogenation conditions for the various basestocks. Control of the operating variables that affect the hydrogenation of fats and oils is necessary to produce the desired product functionality. 2.8.1 Operating Variables Hydrogenation is a reaction of three components: oil, hydrogen, and a catalyst. The reaction takes place on the surface of the catalyst where the oil and gas molecules are adsorbed and brought into close contact. Therefore, any condition that affects the catalyst surface or controls the supply of gas to the catalyst surface will, in turn, affect the course and rate of the reaction. The variables that can affect the results of the hydrogenation are temperature, degree of agitation, hydrogen pressure in the reactor, catalyst amount, type of catalyst, hydrogen gas purity, feedstock source, and feedstock quality. The effects of the variables are discussed below. 2.8.1.1 Temperature Hydrogenation, like most chemical reactions, proceeds at a faster rate with increased temperatures. An increase in temperature decreases the solubility of the hydrogen gas in the liquid oil while increasing the reaction rate. This causes quicker hydrogen removal from the catalyst to reduce the quantity of hydrogen on the catalyst surface, resulting in a high selectivity and isomer formation. Therefore, increased temperature increases selectivity, trans-isomer development, and the reaction rate that results in a steep SFI curve. Because hydrogenation is an exothermic reaction, it will create heat as long as the reaction is active; a decrease of one iodine value increases the reaction temperature by 1.6 to 1.7°C (2.9 to 3.1°F). Temperature increases will increase the reaction rate until an optimum is reached. At this point, cooling of the reaction mixture is required to continue hydrogenation. The optimum temperature varies for different products, but most oils probably reach their maximum temperature at 450 to 500°F (230 to 260°C). 2.8.1.2 Pressure Most edible fats and oils hydrogenations are performed at hydrogen pressures ranging from 0.7 to 4.0 bar (10 to 60 psig). At low pressures, the hydrogen gas
114
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
dissolved in the oil does not cover the catalyst surface, while at high pressure, hydrogen is readily available for saturation of the double bonds. The increased saturation rate results in a decrease in trans-isomer development and selectivity to produce a flatter SFI curve. 2.8.1.3 Agitation The main function of agitation is to supply dissolved hydrogen to the catalyst surface, but the reaction mass must also be agitated for the distribution of heat or cooling for temperature control and suspension of the catalyst throughout the oil mixture for uniformity of reaction. Agitation has a significant effect on selectivity and isomerization — both are decreased because the catalyst is supplied with sufficient hydrogen to increase the reaction rate. 2.8.1.4 Catalyst Level The hydrogenation reaction rate increases as the catalyst concentration is increased up to a point and then levels off. The increase in rate is caused by an increase in active catalyst surface; however, a maximum is reached because at very high levels hydrogen will not dissolve fast enough to adequately supply the higher catalyst levels. Both selectivity and trans-isomer formation are increased with catalyst concentration increases, but only slightly. 2.8.1.5 Catalyst Type The choice of catalysts has a strong influence on the reaction rate, preferential selectivity, and geometric isomerization. Nickel catalysts are used almost exclusively for edible fats and oils hydrogenation. Catalysts are prepared by a variety of techniques, some propriety to the catalyst supplier; however, nickel catalyst is usually prepared by the reduction of a nickel salt and supported on an inert solid or flaked in hardfat or a combination of the two. The activity of a catalyst depends on the number of active sites available for hydrogenation. These active sites may be located on the surface of the catalyst or deep inside the pores. High-selectivity catalysts allow the processor to reduce the linolenic fatty acid without producing excessive amounts of stearic fatty acid, thus producing a product with good oxidative stability and a low melting point. The selectivity characteristics of a catalyst are unrelated to the ability of the catalyst to form trans fatty acids because the catalyst may have a very low or very high selectivity, but all common nickel catalysts appear to produce the same level of trans fatty acids at the same conditions. However, a catalyst may be treated with other materials, such as sulfur, which increases the amount of trans fatty acids unsaturation. Sulfur-poisoned catalysts produce larger quantities of trans-isomers in hydrogenated oils. Reaction with sulfur inhibits the capacity of nickel to adsorb and dissociate hydrogen, reducing the total activity of the catalyst. As the ability of the nickel to hydrogenate is reduced, its tendency to promote isomerization is enhanced.
Fats and Oils Processing
115
Hydrogenated oils with a relatively high melting point at a high iodine value, which results in a very steep SFI slopes, are the result of the high trans-isomer content. Commercially, sulfur-treated catalysts have been found to provide more uniform performance than products that are sulfur-poisoned during processing. Copper chromite catalysts have been used for selective hydrogenation of linolenic fatty acid to linoleic fatty acid in soybean oil for a more flavorful, stable salad oil with higher winterization yields. The selectivity offered by these catalysts is excellent, but the activity is poor and they are more sensitive to catalyst poisons. Precious metals have been investigated and found effective as hydrogenation catalysts. Evaluations have shown that basestocks hydrogenated with 0.0005% palladium modified with silver and bismuth were exceedingly more active and slightly more selective with more trans fatty acids development than were equivalent stocks prepared with a nickel catalyst. Subsequent evaluations have shown that the precious metals are more active at lower temperatures than nickel. Oils have been hydrogenated at 60°C (140°F) with precious metals, while temperatures above 130 to 140°C (265 to 285°F) are required with a nickel catalyst. Trans-isomer development is increased as the hydrogenation temperature is increased, therefore, less trans-isomer development should be obtained with precious metal utilization at low temperatures.66 Palladium has been found to be some 30 times as active as nickel, as only 6 ppm is required to replace 200 ppm nickel. The principal deterrent to the use of palladium has been economics, both in the initial costs and recovery problems associated with the minute quantities required. However, with an adequate recovery system, the precious metal catalysts can be more cost effective than a nickel catalyst due to lower utility costs, a long life cycle and spent catalyst recycling directly into fresh catalyst.67 2.8.1.6 Catalyst Poisons Refined oils and the hydrogen gas can contain impurities that modify or poison the catalyst. Catalyst poisons are a factor that can have a significant effect on the product. The poisons effectively reduce catalyst concentration with a consequent change in the selectivity, isomerization, and rate of reaction. Impurities present in both the feedstock oil and hydrogen gas are known to have a deleterious effect on the nickel catalyst. Hydrogen gas may contain carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulfide, or ammonia. Refined oil can contain soaps, sulfur compounds, phosphatides, moisture, FFA, mineral acids, and a host of other materials that can change the catalyst. Studies have determined that 1 ppm sulfur poisons 0.004% nickel, 1 ppm phosphorus poisons 0.0008% nickel, 1 ppm bromine poisons 0.00125% nickel, and 1 ppm nitrogen poisons 0.0014% nickel.68 Sulfur primarily affects the activity to promote isomerization by inhibiting the capacity of the nickel catalyst to absorb and dissociate hydrogen. Phosphorus in the form of phosphatides and soaps affects selectivity by residing at the catalyst pore entrance to hinder the triglyceride exit for a higher degree of saturation.69 Water or moisture and FFA are deactivators that decrease the hydrogenation rate by reacting chemically with the catalyst to form nickel soaps.
116
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
2.8.1.7 Catalyst Reuse Hydrogenation with used catalyst offers economic advantages when sufficient activity remains after the previous use; however, at some point diminishing returns arise due to filtration problems as well as changes in reaction rate and selectivity. The filtration problems include: (1) FFA in the oils reacting with the catalyst to form nickel soaps, which can blind filters; (2) decreased particle size from mechanical attrition resulting in colloidal nickel, which will pass through the filter screens; and (3) excessive levels required to maintain the desired nickel content and activity due to catalyst poisons and dilution with filter aid and oil. Selectivity will decrease with each use, while trans-isomerization increases with each catalyst reuse. It has also been observed that trans-isomers increase more rapidly when the catalyst is exposed to air after use. Usually, fats and oils processors specify new catalyst for the production of critical basestocks and reuse catalyst for those products for which selectivity is not as important. In a catalyst reuse program, the once-used catalysts are segregated to permit identification and are used by lot, with care taken to maintain the identity of each. The lots are graded down on the basis of the activity during the last use. Each succeeding grade is used for products requiring a lower degree of selectivity until finally it is used to harden low-iodinevalue hardfat. In the latter usage, selectivity is of no consequence because the hardstock is almost completely saturated, and it makes no difference if the catalyst is selective or nonselective. 2.8.1.8 Source Oils Hydrogenation selectivity depends on the type of unsaturated fatty acids available and the number of unsaturated fatty acids per triglyceride. Those oils with high linolenic or linoleic fatty acid levels hydrogenate more rapidly and to higher melting points than oils with high oleic fatty acid levels. The relative hydrogenation reactivity for the 18-carbon fatty acids is69 Hydrogenation Reactivity Fatty Acid
Relative Reactivity
C-18:3 Linolenic
40
C-18:2 Linoleic
20
C-18:1 Oleic
1
2.8.2 Hydrogenation Systems Batch hydrogenation is most commonly used in the edible-oil industry, primarily because of its simplicity and flexibility for use with different source oils. Essentially all that is required is a reaction vessel, usually referred to as a converter, that can withstand 7 to 10 bar (105 to 150 psig) pressure, with an agitator, heating and cooling coils, a hydrogen gas inlet, piping and pumps to move the oil in and out, and a sample port
Fats and Oils Processing
117
for process control of the reaction. The converter must also be provided with the means to control the three reaction variables: pressure, temperature, and rate of agitation. Two different batch converter designs utilized for the partial hydrogenation of edible fats and oils are recirculation and dead-end. In the recirculation system, hydrogen gas is introduced at the bottom of the vessel, and nonreacted hydrogen gas is withdrawn from the headspace, purified, and returned to the converter. The converter is almost always filled with hydrogen under pressure in the operation of the recirculation system. Hydrogenation begins immediately when the catalyst is added with the oil charge during the heating period and thereafter until the endpoint is attained when recirculation is discontinued. Reaction temperature is controlled by circulating water through the cooling coils to carry away the heat of reaction. The hydrogenated oil is pumped out of the converter through an external cooler to a filter for catalyst removal. A dead-end hydrogenation system is outlined in Figure 2.6. The converter is loaded with oil from a scale tank or metering devise. Converter vacuum is utilized to deaerate, dry, and prevent any hydrogenation while heating with steam to reaction temperature. The catalyst, slurried in a portion of the feedstock, is added during the heating period. When the oil reaches reaction temperature, the vacuum is discontinued and hydrogen is added until the specified pressure is attained. This pressure Bleached Oil Meter or Scale Tank Catalyst
Catalyst Slurry Hydrogen Gas
Agitated Converter 7 to 10 bar
Drop Tank 150°F Exit
Catalyst Filter Hydrogenated Oil Figure 2.6 Dead-end batch hydrogenation process flow.
50mm Hg Vacuum Steam & Water 50mm Hg Vacuum Cooling Water Used Catalyst
118
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
is maintained during the hydrogenation. An agitator designed to provide efficient hydrogen dispersion is necessary to create a vortex to draw hydrogen from the headspace back into the oil. When the exothermic reaction has raised the oil temperature close to the maximum specified temperature, cooling water is introduced into the coils. Samples are drawn from the converter via the sample port as the reaction proceeds to measure the hydrogenation progress. Agitation is suspended whenever awaiting a laboratory analysis to confirm that the endpoint has been reached. When the endpoint has been attained, the hydrogen is vented to the atmosphere through the vacuum system, and the oil is cooled in the converter, in a drop tank, or with a heat exchanger. After cooling to 150°F (65°C), the oil is filtered through a black press to separate the catalyst from the oil. Hydrogenation black presses traditionally have been of the plate and frame or pressure leaf variety. From an operations standpoint, the two types of converters do not differ very much. In general, the dead-end type is preferred by many processors because it (1) requires less energy, (2) offers more versatility, (3) requires less capital and operating costs, and (4) is safer than the recirculation system. Quality and performance-wise, the advantages for the dead-end system are (1) oxidation and hydrolysis prevention through deaeration and dehydration provided by the vacuum during heat up and cooling, (2) more positive control of the reaction for product uniformity, and (3) the ability to vary the hydrogen pressure as well as temperature. Most hydrogenations of edible fats and oils are performed both in the United States and in the rest of the world in batch converters. Continuous hydrogenation systems have been available for quite some time, but their commercial usage has been limited for several reasons. The maximum value for any continuous operation is realized when it is used to produce large quantities of the same product. Considerable out-of-specification product can be produced during a change from one product to another. Because most fats and oils processors produce a variety of products, several different basestocks are routinely required that can be produced more uniformly with batch hydrogenation systems. 2.8.3 Hydrogenation Control In any hydrogenation operation, except those carried out to make low-iodinevalue hardfats, the ultimate aim is to produce a partially hydrogenated basestock with a definite preconceived consistency or a basestock suitable for blending with other basestocks or oils to produce the desired finished product functionality. Batchto-batch variation in consistency is encountered even when the same hydrogenation conditions are maintained due to differences in the feedstock oil, catalyst activity, and selectivity as well as the other minor variables. Therefore, it is important to identify controls that will permit the reaction to be stopped at a point that will provide the desired consistency. These controls are usually exercised at the end of the hydrogenation, but can be used throughout the reaction to follow the hydrogenation progress. Physical consistency of most finished shortenings, margarines, and other fats and oils products is identified by analytical methods, such as solids fat index (SFI), iodine value (IV), and/or melting points. However, time restraints during
Fats and Oils Processing
119
hydrogenation require more rapid controls. Hydrogenation controls used to determine basestock endpoints include: • Refractive index: Hydrogenation reduces both the iodine value and the refractive index of oils. The relationship between the iodine value and refractive index depends on the molecular weights of the glycerides, which is very nearly the same for most oils. The exceptions are the oils high in either lauric or erucic fatty acids. Correlation between iodine value and refractive index is not precise, but will be within one or two units, which should be adequate to monitor the hydrogenation reaction and indicate when to interrupt the reaction for more precise evaluations. • Mettler dropping point: The relationship of iodine value to melting point can be changed by varying hydrogenation conditions, catalyst types, and levels, therefore, it is necessary to measure both refractive index and melting characteristics for most basestocks with iodine values below 90. Mettler dropping point analysis can provide a reliable result in less than 30 minutes for these basestocks. Usually, the oil is hydrogenated to a refractive index before determining the Mettler dropping point, which is the controlling analysis. If the melting point (dropping point) is lower than desired, hydrogenation is continued and the process is repeated until the specified melting point is obtained. • Quick titer: Refractive indices are rarely used for low-IV hardfat hydrogenation control. The refractometers are generally kept at 40.0°C (± 0.1°C), and the hardfats would solidify on the prism at this temperature. The hardfat is too hard for dropping point determinations, and IV or official titer determinations are too time consuming. A nonstandardized “quick titer” evaluation is usually used for endpoint control for the hardfats. In this evaluation, a titer thermometer is dipped into a hot sample directly from the converter and rotated in the air until the fat forms clouds on the thermometer bulb. The correlation between iodine value and quick-titer results is different for each source oil, therefore, quick-titer limits must be predetermined for each product.
2.8.4 Hydrogenated Basestock System Most prepared foods are formulated with ingredients designed for their application or, in many cases, specifically for the particular product or processing technique employed by the producer. These customer-tailored products have expanded the product base for fats and oils processors from a few basic products to literally hundreds. Each of these products could be formulated to require a different hydrogenated product for each different product. This practice with the ever-increasing number of finished products would result in a scheduling nightmare with a large number of product heels (product left over after blending) tying up tank space and inventory. Basestock systems with a limited number of hydrogenated stock products for blending to meet the finished product requirements are utilized by most fats and oils processors. The advantages provided by a well-designed basestock system are basically control and efficiency.70 The control advantages include: • Hydrogenated oil batch blending to average minor variations. • Increased uniformity by the production of the same product more often.
120
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
• Reduced contamination afforded by the ability to schedule compatible products together. • Elimination of product deviations generated from attempts to use product heels. • Elimination of rework generated by heel deterioration before use.
The efficiency advantages contributed by a basestock system include: • Hydrogenation scheduling to maintain basestock inventories rather than reacting to customer orders. • Hydrogenation of full batches instead of producing some partial batches to meet demands. • Better reaction time to meet customer requirements.
Basestock requirements will vary with each processor, depending on the customer requirements, which dictate the finished products produced. The basestock systems can include several source oils or can be limited to almost a single oil type. In either case, the basestock inventories usually consist of a few hydrogenated products that cover a wide range for blending to the desired consistencies: • Brush hydrogenated basestocks: For many edible-fat ingredient specifications, a liquid oil is required. To guarantee an acceptable shelf life, the level of polyunsaturates should be low, with an absence or severely reduced level of linolenic fatty acids (C-18:3). This can be achieved by a light and highly selective hydrogenation of an oil within the oleic/linoleic fatty acid group, such as soybean, sunflower, or canola. During hydrogenation, the iodine value drop is kept to a minimum to reduce the formation of saturated fatty acids, and the trans-isomers formation is largely suppressed. The hydrogenation should be performed at a low temperature to reduce the formation of trans-isomers. A high pressure of 3 to 4 bar (45 to 60 psig), in combination with a new catalyst with high activity, selectivity, and poison resistance should be used. Optimum conditions will vary considerably, depending on the geometry of the converter, agitator, hydrogen gas purity, and the other hydrogenation variables. After hydrogenation, this basestock can be winterized or fractionated to produce a flavor-stable salad oil or a highstability liquid oil depending on the extent of the hydrogenation. This basestock class is also very useful in margarine oil blends, snack-frying oil, and in specialty product formulations. • Partially hydrogenated flat basestocks: Many food products require fats and oils products that have an extended plastic range with good oxidative stability. The products must be soft and plastic at room temperature and still possess some body at temperatures of 100°F (38°C) with melting points only slightly above body temperature. Stability is important because of the probable exposure to baking or frying temperatures and long shelf-life expectancy. These basestock requirements can impose a conflicting set of operating conditions. Highly selective conditions are desirable to convert all linolenic and as much linoleic fatty acids as possible to oleic fatty acids for maximum stability. However, highly selective conditions also favor the formation of trans-isomers, which are undesirable for this application. The trans-isomers have higher melting points than the normal oleic fatty acid without the stability improvement. Further, the trans-isomers restrict the amount
Fats and Oils Processing
121
of saturated fatty acids that would increase the stability and serve to extend the plastic range while providing the high-temperature body desired. Usually, moderately selective conditions are utilized to produce these flat SFI basestocks, for example, relatively low temperatures of 300 to 350°F (150 to 175°C) with high pressures of 20 to 30 psig (1.3 to 2 bar) with a selective catalyst that has transisomer suppressant qualities. Reuse catalysts should be avoided, as they enhance trans-isomer formation. • Partially hydrogenated steep basestocks: The physical properties of these basestocks are characterized by steep SFI curves or high solids contents at the lower measuring temperatures with an absence of solids at temperatures higher than body temperature. Hydrogenation of these basestocks should be carried out with highly selective conditions or high temperature and low pressure. A used catalyst, sometimes enhanced with a new, very selective catalyst, can be utilized to help achieve the desired high selectivity and trans-isomer formation. These basestocks are beneficial in blends for margarine oils, high-stability frying shortenings, nondairy products, fillings, and other products requiring a sharp melting point with good flavor stability while providing the required firmness at room temperature. • Low IV hardfats: These basestocks are often referred to as fully hydrogenated hardfats, or stearines; however, regulations require a zero IV for the fully saturated designation. Because catalyst activity is the only criterion with these hydrogenations, a used catalyst can be utilized. In general, high-pressure (4 bar or 60 psig, or higher) and high-temperature (450°F or 230°C) conditions are used for these basestocks to make the reaction progress as rapidly as possible.
Table 2.3 outlines a soybean oil basestock system with seven hydrogenated stock oils ranging from a lightly hydrogenated 109 IV to a saturated hardfat with a maximum IV of 8. Utilization of a similar basestock system designed for the required product mix should enable fats and oils processors to meet most shortening specifications by blending two or more basestocks, except for some specialty products that can be made only with special hydrogenation conditions. SFI is one of the most important consistency measurements, and it also indicates the selectivity of the conditions used to prepare the individual basestocks. It measures the amount of solids present in a fat at different temperatures from below room temperature to above normal body temperature. A fat can appear to be a solid, but really exist as a semisolid and does not have a distinct melting point. Natural and hydrogenated fats and oils melt over a wide range of temperatures. SFI analysis determines the solid or unmelted portion of a fat over a measured temperature range. These results relate to the consistency of the fats and oils product in terms of its softness, plasticity, organolepic, and other physical properties important for its use as an ingredient in prepared foods. The slope of the SFI curve shows the effects of hydrogenation selectivity as it affects consistency. The SFI curve slope becomes steeper as the hydrogenation conditions are made more selective, that is, the highest temperature, lowest pressure, and highest level of a selective catalyst. The slope of the SFI curve becomes flatter as the hydrogenation reaction conditions are made less selective with lower temperatures, higher pressure, and low catalyst levels. These effects are graphically illustrated for the soybean oil basestocks in Figure 2.7.
122
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 2.3 Hydrogenated Soybean Oil Basestock System Basestock Type
Brush
Iodine Value
Flat
Steep
85
a
30 ± 2
33 ± 2 35 ± 1 43 ± 3 46.5 ± 1.5
b
10.0°C/50°F
4 max
18 ± 3
25 ± 2 41 ± 3 62 ± 3
68 ± 3
b
21.1°C/70°F
2 max
8.0 ± 2.0 12 ± 3 24 ± 3 50 ± 3
59 ± 3
b
26.7°C/80°F
—
—
5±1
54 ± 3
b
33.3°C/92°F
—
—
—
<3.5
26 ± 3
40 ± 3
b
40.0°C/104°F
—
—
—
—
6±3
16 ± 2
b
Titer, °C
—
—
—
—
—
—
52 ± 2
C-16:0 Palmitic
10.8
10.2
10.1
10.9
10.7
10.7
10.5
C-18:0 Stearic
4.4
6.4
7.0
8.2
15.2
20.8
86.9
44.3
68.2
72.0
75.0
70.7
66.3
1.7
Mettler Dropping Point, °C
80
74
Hardfat
109
66
60
<8
Solids Fat Index:
16 ± 3 45 ± 3
Fatty Acid Composition, %
C-18:1 Oleicc C-18:2 Linoleic
37.7
15.2
10.9
5.9
3.1
2.2
—
C-18:3 Linolenicc
2.8
—
—
—
—
—
—
Trans fatty acids, %
14.8
22.7
25.3
44.7
45.5
45.0
nil
c
Hydrogenation Conditionsd:
Brush
Flat
Steep
Hardfat
Gassing Temp., °F
300
300
300
300
Hydrogenation Temp., °F
325
350
440
450
Pressure, bar
3.0 to 4.0
1.3 to 1.5
0.7 to 1.0
4.0
Catalyst, % nickel 0.01 to 0.02
0.02
0.04 to 0.08
0.04 to 0.08
Agitation
fixed
fixed
fixed
fixed
Notes: a Too soft to analyze; b too hard to analyze; c including trans fatty acids; d optimum conditions will vary dependent upon the converter, agitation, hydrogen gas purity, etc.
2.9 INTERESTERIFICATION The term interesterification refers to the fats and oils reaction in which fatty acid esters react with other esters or fatty acids to produce new esters by an interchange of fatty acid groups. More simply stated, interesterification can be visualized as a breakup of a specific glyceride, removal of a fatty acid at random, shuffling it among the rest of the fatty acid pool, and replacement at random by another fatty acid. Because of the random rearrangement of the fatty acids of the natural oil, the interesterification process is also commonly referred to as randomization, rearrangement, or modification.
Fats and Oils Processing
123
80 70
Solids Fat Index
60 50 40 30 20 10 0
50°F
60°F 109 IV
70°F 80°F Temperature 85 IV
80 IV
74 IV
92°F 66 IV
104°F 60 IV
Figure 2.7 Soybean oil basestocks.
Natural fats and oils are mixtures of mixed triglycerides. Their functional properties as ingredients in prepared foods are directly related to the type of triglycerides in the fats and oils. Triglyceride type is determined by the fatty acid composition and the distribution of the fatty acids on the individual triglyceride molecules. Distribution of the fatty acids on the individual triglyceride molecule and the quantity of each triglyceride type depend on the proportions of the individual fatty acids, the fat or oil source, and the processing history of the product. Nature provides each fat and oil with a selective fatty acid distribution among the glycerides that affects the consistency of the product as either a solid or a liquid. Trisaturated triglycerides provide structure, disaturated monounsaturated triglycerides provide both structure and lubricity, and the lower-melting unsaturated triglycerides provide lubricity only. Table 4.3, in chapter 4, shows the melting points of the common triglycerides found in most oleic/linoleic fatty acid group fats and oils.71 The interesterification processes can alter the original order of distribution of the fatty acids in the triglyceride-producing products with melting and crystallization characteristics different from the original oil or fat. Unlike hydrogenation, interesterification neither affects the degree of saturation nor causes isomerization of the fatty acid double bond. It does not change the fatty acid composition of the starting material, but rearranges the fatty acids on the glycerol molecule. The process of interesterification can be considered as the redistribution of the fatty acids. This change in the distribution of the fatty acids among the triglycerides affects the physical nature and behavior of the fats. Commercially, the interesterification process is utilized for processing edible fats and oils to produce confectionery or coating fats, margarine oils, cooking oils, frying fats, shortenings, and other special application products. Interesterification was not a preferred process in the United States except for some very specific applications: (1) modification of lard to function as a plastic shortening, and (2) random
124
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
rearrangement of lauric oil based confectionery or coating fats. Interesterification of lard was used to obtain a different triglyceride composition for more desirable physical properties than the original fat. Plasticized shortening made from randomized lard has a smooth appearance and texture because the crystal structure has been changed from beta (β) to beta-prime (β′), which also helps it retain its appearance during storage with better creaming properties. The market for premium lard shortenings no longer exists due initially to the competitive pricing of vegetable oils and, more recently, the reduced use of animal fats due to high cholesterol and saturated fatty acid content. The primary, but limited, use of interesterification in the United States was for the processing of value-added specially fats, such as confectionery or coating fats. These fats, called hard butters, are used as substitutes for cocoa butter in coating and other applications characterized by a relatively high solid fat content at room temperature with a sharp melting point. The interesterified hard butters are typically composed of rearranged, hydrogenated palm kernel or coconut oils, with lesser quantities of other vegetable oils to adjust the melting point. Outside the United States, interesterification has had a much wider application to process basestocks or finished products for margarine oils, cooking oils, cocoa butter equivalents (CBE), and other specialty products.66 Now, efforts to eliminate or reduce trans fatty acids have kindled an interest in the interesterification process in the United States. Two general types of chemical interesterification or rearrangement processes practiced are random and directed. In random rearrangement, the fatty acid radicals freely move from one position to another in a single glyceride or from one glyceride to another. As the fatty acids rearrange, they reach an equilibrium that is based on the composition of the starting material and is predictable from the laws of probability. Directed rearrangement modifies the fatty acid randomization by upsetting the equilibration mixture. This process is carried out at low temperatures to allow crystallization of a portion of the mixture while the interchange of fatty acids is continuing in the liquid portion. This produces a different composition composed of larger proportions of high-melting glycerides and a corresponding larger proportion of very-low-melting glycerides. The degree of difference depends on the temperature, time, and other conditions of the reaction. A third rearrangement process, enzymatic interesterification, is becoming popular to produce products free of trans fatty acids and high-value-added products, such as structured triglycerides for confectionery use. The major advantages of the enzymatic interesterification over chemical processes are the specificity available in lipase catalysts and the greater degree of reaction control. Oil modification by lipases is performed under anhydrous conditions at temperatures up to 160°F (70°C). Two types of enzyme catalysts available include: a random lipase that produces products similar to chemical randomization and a 1,3 fatty acid specificity lipase that allows the production of specific triglycerides at high yields.66 2.9.1 Chemical Rearrangement Catalyst Fatty acid rearrangement may occur without the use of a catalyst at a temperature of 475°F (250°C) or higher, but most processors use alkali metal alkylates or alkali
Fats and Oils Processing
125
metals to speed up the reaction. Fats reacted at high temperatures without the assistance of a catalyst proceed slowly to equilibrium and have other undesirable changes as well (i.e., isomerization, polymerization, and decomposition). Some of the chemical rearrangement catalysts commercially utilized include:72,73 • Sodium methylate, an alkali metal (alkylate), is the most widely used low-temperature interesterification catalyst. It is active at a lower temperature, speeds up the reaction, has a relatively low cost, does not require a vacuum during processing, and is easily dispersed in fat. Sodium methylate is used either as a powder or as a dispersion in solvents, such as xylene, at very low levels, 0.1% if the starting material has a low free fatty acid level and is dry; however, the average usage range is 0.2 to 0.4%. • Sodium potassium alloy, which has been used as an interesterification catalyst at 0.05 to 0.1%, is liquid at ambient temperature and does not require dispersing in a solvent for introduction to the reaction. It can catalyze low-temperature reactions at faster rates than other catalysts, but requires high sheer agitation and is typically more expensive even though it offers a low oil loss. The interesterification reaction starts almost instantaneously with the addition of the catalyst and is complete in as short a time as 5 minutes. The feedstock oil or fat must be very dry before the addition of this catalyst. It will react with moisture to liberate hydrogen gas, which can inactivate the catalyst. Additionally, this creates an explosion potential from the heat and hydrogen gas generated during deactivation. • Sodium or potassium hydroxide are the lowest cost rearrangement catalysts, but they must be used in combination with glycerol and require a two-stage reaction under vacuum at high temperatures to effect a reaction. The first stage is conducted at 140°F (60°C) to neutralize any free fatty acids, dry the oil, and disperse the catalyst. The reaction mixture is heated to 285 to 320°F (140 to 160°F) during the second stage to effect rearrangement. Glycerol is a necessary component of this catalyst for the reaction to occur and usually forms small amounts of mono- and diglycerides.
The compounds described above are probably not the real chemical interesterification catalysts, but serve as initiators in the process of forming the true interesterification catalyst. Most likely, intermediates, such as sodium glycerate, formed in the fat are the active catalyst. When the catalyst is dispersed in a previously dried oil maintained at about 140 to 175°F (60 to 80°C), a white slurry develops. After heating, a characteristic brown color develops indicating that the reaction has begun. The color change is associated with the active catalyst formation, which is probably an intermediate glycerate anion. The rearrangement catalyst must be inactivated and removed at the end of the process because interesterification is a reversible reaction. Most chemical catalysts can be removed by washing the reaction mixture with water to separate a salt- or soap-rich aqueous phase. An alternative method is to terminate the reaction with phosphoric or citric acid and remove the solid acid salts by filtration. Either technique results in product loss:
1. Acid termination losses: a. Catalyst: One gram of sodium methylate catalyst yields the interesterified product, 5.519 grams of methyl esters, 5.67 grams of sodium soap, and
126
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
2.13 grams of diglycerides. The loss for the catalyst level used can be calculated as 11.2 pounds product loss for each pound of catalyst used. b. Bleaching-earth oil retention: It may be assumed that the bleaching earth will retain its weight in neutral oil or a 0.1% bleaching earth will remove the phosphate or citric acid salts and retain 0.1% neutral oil. c. Deodorizer losses: Deodorization to a 0.05% FFA would necessitate a loss of the FFA content above this level. 2. Water termination losses: This neutralization process adds the entrained oil losses experienced with water washing to those for the acid termination. The only savings for this procedure are the acid costs; however, the oil quality improvement with water termination may justify the added expense.
2.9.2 Endpoint Control A brown color develops when the chemical reaction begins and deepens as the reaction continues. In most operations, the reaction is allowed to proceed to a fixed time period after the appearance of brown color before sampling to determine if the reaction has been completed. The reaction is most often confirmed by monitoring changes for a characteristic particular to the source oil or mixture of oils processed, which usually involve evaluations for specific product changes. The effect of interesterification of glyceride mixtures differs in different cases, depending on the composition of the original fat, mixture of fats, or prior processing. Some of the evaluations used to determine interesterification endpoint are discussed below. 2.9.2.1 Melting Point Interesterification may raise, lower, or have no effect on the melting point of a fat or oil depending on the starting glyceride composition. Common vegetable oils, including soybean, cottonseed, palm, cocoa butter, and coconut oil, show a rise in the melting point; in contrast, the melting points of animal fats, such as lard, tallow, and butter fat, remain unaltered or only slightly lowered after interesterification as shown on Table 2.4.72,74 Vegetable oils have a nonrandom distribution of fatty acids across the three positions on the glyceride. The saturated fatty acids are usually in the sn-1 and sn-3 positions and the sn-2 position is usually unsaturated. Therefore, even though vegetable oils contain saturates, there are very few, if any, trisaturates (SSS). During chemical interesterification of these oils, some fully saturated triglycerides are formed to effect a rise in the melting point. The animal fats show different distribution patterns because the saturated fatty acids are distributed on all three sn positions and remain essentially unchanged by interesterification. Therefore, mixtures of a highly saturated fat with liquid oil will result in a lower melting point by random rearrangement because the saturated fatty acids become more widely distributed.75-77 2.9.2.2 Fiber Optic Spectrometer Monitoring A method based on a quantitative measurement of oil spectral changes after the catalyst (sodium methoxide) addition during interesterification has been developed.
Fats and Oils Processing
127
Table 2.4 Melting Point Changes with Random Rearrangement Fats and Oils Products
Original °F
°C
Rearranged °F
°C
Soybean oil
19.4
–7.0
41.9
5.5
Cottonseed oil
50.9
10.5
93.2
34.0
109.4
43.0
109.4
43.0
Lard Tallow
115.2
46.2
112.3
44.6
Palm oil
102.9
39.4
108.9
42.7
Palm kernel oil
82.9
28.3
80.4
26.9
Coconut oil
77.9
25.5
82.8
28.2
H-palm kernel oil
113.0
45.0
93.9
34.4
H-coconut oil
100.0
37.8
88.9
31.6
This technology monitors interesterification online with a fiber optic spectrometer, tracks the progress of the reaction, and minimizes the catalyst dosage and reaction time. To initiate and complete interesterification, the oil absorbance must reach levels of ~0.4 and ~1.0 at 374 nm, respectively. It is claimed that the reaction time and the dosage of sodium methoxide can be significantly reduced and that the rearranged oils have higher oxidative stabilities due to reduced tocopherol inactivation compared to conventional randomization.77 2.9.2.3 Solids Fat Index Solids fat index (SFI) analysis control requires measurement at several temperatures for definite results to identify a change, and it is very time consuming. However, small changes in melting point evaluations may be accompanied by more significant changes in the SFI content and slope for the curve throughout the range of functionality-important temperatures. The changes in trisaturate and disaturate glycerides with interesterification are reflected in the SFI contents before and after the reaction. Figure 2.8 shows the effects of interesterification on two different fats and oils sources: natural lard and hydrogenated palm kernel oil. These SFI results78,79 verify that the rearrangement effects are dependent on the composition of the original fat or oil product. Rearranged lard has a flatter SFI slope caused by a higher trisaturates level, which is a more desirable shortening base. Rearranged hydrogenated palm kernel oil results in a steeper SFI slope with a lower melting point for improved eating characteristics. SFI analysis are useful for formulation and to confirm that the predetermined results have been attained, but are probably too time consuming for interesterification endpoint control. 2.9.2.4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) is most useful for studying the kinetics of crystallization and melting of triglyceride mixtures under dynamic conditions.
128
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
80 70
Solids Fat Index
60 50 40 30 20 10 0
50°F Natural Lard
60°F
70°F 80°F Temperature Rearranged Lard
92°F
H-PKO
100°F Rearranged H-PKO
Figure 2.8 Rearrangement effect on solids fat index (SFI).
The heating and cooling thermograms resulting from DSC show distinct differences between some nonrandomized fats and oils. The basis of the cooling curve is that fat crystals give off heat upon solidifying from liquid oils and absorb heat upon melting. Large crystals give up heat so rapidly during formation that the temperature of the fat may raise rapidly during the chilling cycle. The endpoint of lard interesterification is best determined by a cooling curve analysis that indicates the absence of heat of crystallization associated with untreated lard. The endpoint of interesterification for lauric hard butters or coating fats might be determined by a loss of rapid solidification of the fully saturated glyceride component on cooling. 2.9.2.5 Glyceride Compositional Analysis The basic change that occurs due to interesterification is in the glyceride composition. Therefore, analysis that can identify the glyceride composition should be the most definite endpoint possible. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods can separate triglycerides according to their level of saturation or on the basis of molecular weighs. 2.9.3 Random Chemical Interesterification Processes Random chemical rearrangement of fats and oils can be accomplished using either a batch or continuous process. Both perform the three important rearrangement steps: (1) pretreatment of the oil, (2) reaction with the catalyst, and (3) deactivation of the catalyst. A typical batch rearrangement reaction vessel is equipped with an agitator, coils for heating and cooling, nitrogen sparging, and vacuum capabilities.
Fats and Oils Processing
129
Table 2.5 Chemical Interesterification Quality Guidelines Stage:
Requirement
Feedstock Treatment
FFA
<0.1%
Soap
<0.1%
Peroxide Value
<10 meq/kg
Predrying
Moisture
<0.1%
Catalyst Addition
Temperature
160 to 210°F 70 to 100°C
Reaction
Catalyst
0.06% plus FFA time 0.19
Time
10 to 30 minutes
Table 2.5 summarizes the quality requirements for chemical interesterification.80 The process steps for batch rearrangement are72,73,78
1. Heat the fat to 250 to 300°F (120 to 150°C) in the reaction vessel under a vacuum to dry the oil. Drying is critical because moisture deactivates the catalyst. Moisture levels in excess of 0.01% will require extra catalyst to complete the reaction. Additional catalyst usage results in higher product losses. A rule of thumb is that each 0.1% of sodium methylate catalyst results in 1.1% neutral oil loss. 2. After drying, the fat is cooled to the reaction temperature, which ranges from 160 to 210°F (70 to 100°C), depending on the product and desired processing conditions. Sodium methylate powder is sucked into the reaction vessel with the vacuum. The amount of catalyst necessary is the amount required to neutralize the free fatty acid, plus a slight excess to catalyze the random rearrangement. Therefore, because one part of sodium methylate will neutralize 5.26 parts of stearic fatty acid and 0.06% excess is enough to catalyze the reaction, the catalyst requirement can be calculated as: (FFA × 0.19) + 0.06 = the percent sodium methylate catalyst required for the reaction. This mixture is agitated to form a white slurry, which indicates good dispersion, for 30 to 60 minutes or until formation of the distinctive brown color indicates randomization. At this point, the mixture is sampled for laboratory analysis to determine if the reaction is complete or requires an additional catalyst and time to attain the predetermined endpoint. 3. When reaction completion is confirmed by the end-point analysis, the catalyst is neutralized in the reaction vessel. Neutralization may include the addition of citric acid (C6H8O7), phosphoric acid (H3PO4), or carbon dioxide (CO2) prior to water washing to deactivate the catalyst. Water combines with sodium methylate to form sodium hydroxide and methyl alcohol, which react with the neutral oil to form soap and methyl esters. Product losses are kept to a minimum by neutralizing with either citric or phosphoric acid and/or CO2 prior to water washing.
Continuous interesterification processes follow the same cycle as the batch process, but utilize different equipment. A process flow for one continuous system is as follows. The oil is heated with a heat exchanger and flash-dried with a vacuum oil dryer to bring the moisture level to 0.01% or less. The catalyst is introduced into the hot oil stream and homogenized for dispersion. The homogenized mixture is
130
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
then passed through a tubular reactor. The reactor residence time can be adjusted by changing the length of the tube. The catalyst is deactivated with water and centrifuged to separate the soap and oil. After separation, the product is vacuum-dried to remove the remaining traces of moisture. 2.9.4 Directed Chemical Interesterification Process In directed rearrangement processes, one or more of the triglyceride products of the interesterification reaction are selectively removed from the ongoing reaction. Trisaturated glycerides crystallize and are separated from the reaction when the mixture is cooled below its melting point. This selective crystallization upsets the equilibrium, and the reaction will produce more trisaturated glycerides to reestablish equilibrium. Theoretically, this process could continue until all the saturated fatty acids are converted into trisaturated glycerides and separated from the reaction. Because this reaction is directed to produce a particular type of glyceride, it is referred to as directed interesterification. In directed interesterification, only catalysts active at low temperatures are effective, and the rate of random rearrangement is important because the trisaturated glycerides can precipitate only as fast as they are formed in the liquid phase. Sodium potassium alloy (NaK) is more suitable for directed interesterification than either sodium or sodium methylate because of its more rapid activity at low temperatures. Continuous processes are normally used for directed interesterification because the batch process is difficult to control and would require a number of extra tanks. The process flow for continuous directed rearrangement is as follows:72,78,81
1. The oil is vacuum dried to 0.01% moisture or less. 2. After drying, the oil is cooled to a temperature just above its melting point with a heat exchanger. 3. A carefully metered stream of NaK catalyst is added to the product stream and mixed or homogenized to suspend the catalyst throughout the product. 4. The homogeneous mixture is quick-chilled with a scraped-wall heat exchanger to a predetermined point to initiate crystallization of the trisaturated glycerides. 5. The cooled mixture is transferred to an agitated vessel where interesterification proceeds under carefully controlled agitation. At this stage, trisaturated glycerides are crystallizing while interesterification of the liquid phase is continuing to form more trisaturated glycerides. 6. Crystallization of the trisaturated glycerides liberates a considerable amount of heat due to fusion, which can increase the reaction temperature beyond the desired point, which necessitates a second chilling step with a scraped-wall heat exchanger. 7. After the second cooling, the product is transferred to another vessel with controlled agitation, where the precipitation of trisaturated glycerides and interesterification continues to the desired endpoint. Crystallization slows as the trisaturates diminish, so this stage requires more time for reaction completion. The level of trisaturated glycerides in the final product can be adjusted by varying the time in the crystallizer, the crystallization temperature, or a combination of the two. 8. After the desired endpoint has been reached, the catalyst is “killed” by adding water. The amount of water is calculated to provide the desired fluidity for centrifuging to
Fats and Oils Processing
131
remove the soap phase. Saponification of the fat can be minimized somewhat by the addition of carbon dioxide with the water to buffer the caustic to a lower pH. 9. After neutralization of the catalyst, the product can be heated to melt the trisaturated glyceride crystals for centrifugation followed by vacuum drying.
2.9.5 Enzymatic Interesterification Enzymes have been used for many years to modify the structure and composition of foods, but only recently have been available on a large enough scale for industrial applications. Lipases have distinct advantages compared to classical chemical catalysts:
1. Enzymes function under mild reaction conditions over a range of temperatures and pressures that minimize the production of side products. 2. Enzyme-catalyzed reactions are more efficient and easier to control. 3. Unique specificities of lipases allow the selection of a particular lipase for the desired application.
Enzymatic interesterification is now used to produce products free of trans fatty acids and high-value-added structured fats and oils.82,83 Useful glyceride mixtures that cannot be obtained by chemical interesterification processes are possible by exploiting the specificity of lipases. In all glyceride reactions, lipases catalyze either the removal or the exchange of fatty acid groups on the glycerol backbone. Different lipases can show preferences for both the position of the fatty acid group on the triglyceride and the nature of the fatty acid. The types of lipase catalyst identified by application specificity are84 • Random lipases, which catalyze reactions at all three positions on the glyceride randomly. • sn-1,-3 specific lipases, which catalyze reactions only at the outer positions of the triglyceride. • A lipase with sn-2 selectivity has been reported; Candida antarctica. • Lipases specific for a particular class of fatty acids; Geotrichum candidum has been found specific for omega-9 fatty acids, others have been found specific for short chain fatty acids, and still others for long chain fatty acids.
Again, the use of lipase catalyst for interesterification of edible fats and oils has advantages over the classical chemical catalysts. One of the most attractive features is the unique specificity possible with their use. Nonspecific lipases provide reactions like the random chemical catalyzed interesterification. Specific lipases make it possible to produce fats and oils with a customized triglyceride structure. The enzymatic process can be selective with the use of a positional specificity lipase. These processes are usually much slower and more sensitive to the reaction conditions to provide a better control over the reaction results. Also, the lipases can operate under milder reaction conditions, temperature, and pressure that minimize the formation of side products. Some of the disadvantages for the enzymatic interesterification process for edible fats and oils are that it generates some FFA and partial glycerides, and it is more
132
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
expensive than the chemical interesterification. A free fatty acid content of 4 to 6% has been reported, which must be removed for edible oil uses. However, the levels of FFA decrease with repeated use of the lipase after the initial stabilization period. Free fatty acid formation can also be reduced by operating at lower temperatures and by drying the enzyme substrate feedstock before use. Diglycerides are formed with both the enzyme and chemical interesterification processes; they are intermediates in the interesterification reaction. A high content of diglycerides can delay crystallization and lower the solid fat content of the interesterified fat, but diglycerides have been used to stabilize the β′-crystal in margarines oils.66 Lipases are manufactured by fermentation of selected microorganisms followed by a purification process. The enzymatic interesterification catalysts are prepared by the addition of a solvent, such as acetone, ethanol, or methanol, to a slurry of an inorganic particulate material in a buffered lipase solution. The precipitated enzyme coats the inorganic material and the lipase-coated particles are recovered by filtration and then dried. A variety of support materials have been used to immobilize lipases. Generally, porous particulate materials with high surface areas are preferred. Typical examples of the support materials are ion-exchange resins, silicas, macroporous polymers, clays, etc. Effective support functionality requirements include: (1) the lipase must adsorb irreversibly with a suitable structure for functionality, (2) pore sizes must not restrict reaction rates, (3) the lipase must not contaminate the finished product, (4) the lipase must be thermally stable, and (5) the lipase must be economical. The dried particles are almost inactive as an interesterification catalyst until hydrated with up to 10% water prior to use. Lipase-catalyzed interesterification of fats and oils can be accomplished either by using a stirred batch reactor or with continuous processing using a fixed-bed reactor. The latter is the preferred process, offering the advantage of minimized reaction times due to the high catalyst substrate ratio along with the other advantages of catalyst recovery, reduced catalyst damage, and improved operability. The continuous fixed-bed interesterification process begins by dissolving the feedstock in a solvent followed by treatment to remove enzyme catalyst inhibitors, poisons, and particulate materials. This solution is then partially saturated with water prior to pumping through a bed of hydrated catalyst particles. The reaction products are a mixture of triglycerides and free fatty acids. After the reaction, the FFA are removed by evaporation and processed for recovery. The FFA-free oil is then solvent fractionated to yield the desired triglyceride composition. 2.9.6 Interesterified Fats and Oils Applications Interesterification processes can be used to produce fats and oils products with different physical and nutritional properties. Rearrangement of the fatty acids on the glycerol backbone affects the structural properties or melting behavior of the fats and oils products. Often, interesterification is combined with other specialized processing techniques, such as fractionation or hydrogenation. By combining interesterification with these and other more sophisticated techniques, the fatty acid and glyceride composition can be manipulated to produce the desired physical
Fats and Oils Processing
133
and functional properties. These products may also be utilized as basestocks for blending with other selected fats and oils products to produce the desired functional properties. Chemical and enzymatic interesterification processes can affect physical properties by changing the melting properties and, in some cases, the crystal behavior. The use of these triglycerides in food products can allow the development of specialty fat and oil products more suitable for the desired application performance, nutritional requirements, or both. Interesterification can be utilized to formulate products with less saturated or isomerized fatty acids for the production of products with low or no trans acids. Margarine and shortening products have been produced using interesterified fats and oils instead of the traditional hydrogenated basestocks. 2.10 wINTERIZATION The descriptive term of winterization evolved from the observation that refined cottonseed oil stored in outside tanks during the winter months physically separated into a hard and clear fraction. Topping or decanting the clear oil from the top of the tanks provided oil that remained liquid without clouding for long periods at cool temperatures. In fact, some cottonseed salad oils routinely had cold test results of 100 hours or more when topped from outside storage tanks. The clear oil portion became known as winterized salad oil.85 The hard fraction from the bottom of the tanks was identified as stearine, which is the solid portion of any fat. A need for a liquid oil with these characteristics was created by the use of refrigerators in the home and the requirements of the mayonnaise and salad dressing industry. Mayonnaise could not be made from oils that would crystallize in the refrigerator and cause the emulsion to break. New terminology emerged because of this association with mayonnaise. Winterized oil became known as salad oil. Summer oils, or oils that had not been subjected to winterization, became known as cooking oils. As the demand for salad oils increased, it became impossible to rely on long-term storage of refined oils for the winterized oil requirement. Processors recognized the obvious solution and created winter conditions indoors. 2.10.1 Classical Winterization Process The indoor process developed to simulate the natural winter process consisted of a chilled room held at 42°F (5.6°C) with deep, narrow, rectangular tanks to provide the maximum surface exposure to cooling. Warm, dry, refined, and bleached oil pumped into the chill room tanks began to cool and crystallize-out stearine immediately, but slowly. Convection heat transfer simulated the outside storage conditions. Agitation was avoided because it fractured the crystal, causing formation of small, soft crystals that were difficult to filter. Cooling with a 42°F room temperature simulated winter conditions in the southern United States closely and required two to three days to produce the desired large crystals for filtering. After
134
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
the oil temperature equated with the room temperature, it was held for several hours to allow the stearine or hard fraction to precipitate more fully. The stearine was separated from the liquid oil by filtering with plate and frame presses. Early installations relied on gravity feed to the presses, but later compressed air or positive displacement pumps were utilized to exert a pressure of 5 to 20 psig to increase the filtration rate. Care was exercised to avoid breaking up the crystals excessively. A slow filtration rate was necessary because of the high oil viscosity and excessive pressure pressed the stearine into the filter cloths, causing a blockage that stopped the oil flow. A large filter area on the order of 2 to 3 pounds of oil per hour per square foot was the general guideline. The stearine cake was melted with hot fat for removal after the filter press was full. Winterization is still performed using the classic techniques outlined above, but many processors have made equipment and process modifications to improve efficiency. Jacketed-enclosed tanks equipped with programmable cooling and agitation have evolved as crystallization cells to replace the open-top, narrow, rectangular tanks cooled by the chill room temperature. However, attempting to force crystallization by means of an excessively cold coolant and rapid agitation results in small crystals that are virtually unfilterable. Recessed plate and frame or pressure leaf filters have been used in winterization because these filters have the cake-holding capacity that the process requires. Obviously, when 15% or more of the feed is removed in the form of stearine, a substantial solids retention capacity is needed. Separation of the stearine from the liquid oil by means of a centrifuge has had some success. The main problem encountered with centrifugal separation is liquid oil yield, as the stearine tends to trap excessive amounts of oil. 2.10.2 Winterization Principle Winterization is a thermomechanical separation process where component triglycerides of fats and oils are crystallized from a melt. The two-component fractional crystallization is accomplished with partial solidification and separation of the higher melting triglyceride components. The complex triglycerides may have one, two, or all three fatty acids, either all the same or different in any of the possible configurations depending on the source oil and prior processing. Fat crystallization occurs in two steps: nucleation, and crystal growth. The rate of nucleation depends on the triglyceride composition of the oil being winterized, the cooling rate of the oil, the temperature of the nucleation, and the mechanical power input or agitation. Growth rate is dependent on the crystallization temperature, time, and mechanical input or agitation. A careful selection of the process variables for a particular oil is very important. The ideal is to produce a small number of nuclei around which the crystals grow larger in size with cooling. A large mass of small crystals that is difficult to filter results when a large number of nuclei are formed. Poor separation and yield also result when crystals group together in clumps that trap large quantities of the liquid phase. The effect of the major processing variables upon winterization performance is discussed below.86
Fats and Oils Processing
135
2.10.2.1 Source Oil Composition Nucleation and crystal growth depend on the composition of the oil being winterized. The various triglycerides in a particular oil will fractionate in the following order: (1) trisaturate, S3; (2) disaturate monounsaturate, S2U; (3) monosaturate diunsaturate, SU2; and (4) triunsaturate, U3. A portion of the higher melting glycerides will be found with the lower melting liquid oils as a result of eutectic formation and equilibrium solubility. Because the mixture of triglycerides in an oil is too complex to predict its phase behavior, a given set of winterization conditions is applicable only for the particular feed oil. For partially hydrogenated oils, the composition of the oil and the hydrogenation conditions affect the winterization yield and quality. Hydrogenation conditions should be selected that produce the lowest level of saturates and trans fatty acids, but still affect the desired iodine value endpoint. 2.10.2.2 Cooling Rate An essential requirement of the winterization process is a slow rate of chilling. Rapid cooling of the oil results in (1) a mass of very small α-crystals, and (2) a high nucleation rate that increases the viscosity, which, in turn, restricts crystal growth. Slow controlled cooling rates produce stable β- or β′-crystals depending on the dominant crystal habit for the source oil winterized, and the viscosity remains low enough to permit nuclei movement to allow crystal growth. Therefore, the cooling rate is dependent on the source oil and prior processing. 2.10.2.3 Crystallization Temperature The crystal growth rate is affected by the temperature of crystallization. A high viscosity resulting from too low a temperature reduces the crystal growth rate. Control of the temperature after crystallization begins is important for transformation from the α to the stable β′- or β-crystal habit. If the process is not properly controlled at this stage, an unstable crystal will develop. A temperature differential between the coolant and the oil must be maintained to avoid shock chilling. A 25°F (14°C) differential has been found appropriate for oil at the beginning of the process. The differential can be reduced to 10°F (5.6°C) by the time the oil reaches 45°F (7.2°C). If the coolant is allowed to become too cold in relation to the oil, a heavy layer of stearine will build up on the surfaces and insulate the oil from the coolant. 2.10.2.4 Agitation Rate Crystal formation is hastened by stirring to bring the first crystals into contact with more of the liquid; however, mild agitation rates are recommended because high shear rates fragment the crystal during the growth stage, thus producing smaller crystals instead of the desirable large crystal.
136
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
2.10.2.5 Crystallization Time Crystallization is inseparably linked to two elements of time: (1) the time it takes to lower the temperature of the material to the point where crystallization will occur, and (2) the time for the crystal to become fully grown. The rate of cooling is a primary factor for determining the size, amount, and stability of the crystals formed. In general, crystals assume their most highly developed and characteristic forms when grown slowly from a melt or solution only slightly supercooled, in which the liquid freely circulates around the crystal. A typical time–temperature sequence for winterization of cottonseed oil is87
1. Refined and bleached cottonseed oil is transferred to the chilling units at 70 to 89°F (21.1 to 26.7°C). 2. The oil is cooled to 55°F (12.8°C) in 6 to 12 hours, when the first crystals usually appear. 3. The oil is cooled to 45°F (7.2°C) in 12 to 18 hours with a reduced cooling rate. At this point, a 2 to 4°F (1.1 to 2.2°C) heat of crystallization temperature increase should be observed. 4. After the oil temperature drops slightly below the previous low, approximately 42°F (5.6°C), it is maintained at this temperature for approximately 12 hours. This period is critical for the effectiveness of the process. Because the oil is viscous and molecular movement is slow, crystals continue to grow after the minimum temperature is reached.
2.10.3 Solvent Winterization Salad oil production with the traditional winterization procedure is a slow process. Two to three day chilling time is required for good filtration and yield. Most vegetable oils that cloud at refrigerator temperatures can be solvent winterized for better yields and to produce a salad oil of better quality in less time than by the conventional process. Comparison of the two procedures indicates many similarities. The major advantage of a solvent winterization system include: (1) viscosity is considerably lower, which allows a faster crystal growth for more rapid stearine separation; (2) the salad oil produced has a better resistance to clouding at cool temperatures for longer cold tests; and (3) less liquid oil trapped in the stearine component for higher salad oil yields. An operational continuous solvent process was described by Cavanagh88 and later by Neumunz89 for winterization of cottonseed oil. Miscella containing 30 to 60% by weight of oil in hexane with a 50% solution preferred is cooled rapidly with a heat exchanger to either 20 to 26°F (–6.6 to –3.3°C) or 8 to 12°F (–13.3 to –11.1°C). After cooling, the miscella passes through a continuous winterizing column, which cools with a series of agitated trays over a 40- to 60-minute period to temperatures as low as –4°F (–20°C). A continuous solids discharge centrifuge separates the solid stearine from the liquid miscella. The solvent is removed from the liquid oil portion with an evaporator system before deodorization. The solid discharge from the
Fats and Oils Processing
137
Table 2.6 Cottonseed Salad Oil Stearine Analysis Winterization Process Iodine value
Conventional
Solvent
95.5
71.6
Solids fat index 50°F/10.0°C
21.6
52.3
70°F/21.1°C
1.3
33.7
80°F/26.7°C
—
1.2
92°F/33.3°C
—
0.1
Fatty acid composition, % C-14:0 Myristic
0.7
0.6
C-16:0 Palmitic
34.6
52.1
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
0.6
0.8
C-18:0 Stearic
2.1
1.9
C-18:1 Oleic
15.8
9.1
C-18:2 Linoleic
46.2
35.5
centrifuge is filtered to remove any foreign material before the residual 10 to 15% hexane solvent is removed with an evaporator system. Controlled agitation of 1 to 10 rpm and a controlled temperature drop to 0°F produces harder, firmer, more compact stearine crystals in solvent, and less oil is entrapped than with conventional winterization systems. Table 2.6 provides a comparison of cottonseed salad oil stearine analytical characteristics from a conventional process and a solvent process. 2.10.4 Winterization Process Control Procedures The acceptability of winterized oil is almost always determined by cold-test analysis. This method measures the ability of the oil to resist crystallization. The cold-test result is the number of hours at 32°F (0°C) required for an oil to become cloudy. AOCS Method Cc 11-53 indicates that an oil has passed the test if it is clear and free of any cloud at 5.5 hours;39 however, most processors and customers have more stringent requirements for cold-test hours. Cottonseed and soybean winterized oil products normally have a minimum cold-test limit of 10 hours and some are as high as 20 hours for special products. Processors have investigated many different potential process control evaluations, procedures, and methods to determine that the winterization process is in control on a timely basis; however, cold test is still the most definitive evaluation, even though the results are not available until a lengthy period after the oil has been winterized. Usually, the winterized oil production is segregated in separate tanks until the cold-test results are available. If the oil fails to meet the specific number of hours, it must be rewinterized. Oils that meet the requirements are transferred to salad oil storage for subsequent deodorization, packaging, or shipment as required. This afterthe-fact analysis to determine the acceptability of the winterized oil places more
138
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
emphasis on process control techniques to ensure that all of the best practices are continually observed. 2.10.5 Winterization Applications Historically, winterization has always been associated with cottonseed oil. It and other liquid oils that contain fractions that solidify when chilled must be winterized or fractionated to remain clear at cool temperatures. Oil that is to be refrigerated or stored in cool warehouses must resist clouding for a period of time to be acceptable aesthetically or for performance. Winterized cottonseed oil was the standard salad oil used by retail-trade food processors to produce mayonnaise and other salad dressing products because of its pleasing flavor and flavor stability. Soybean oil was rejected as a salad oil both at the retail level and by food processors until the flavor stability problem was remedied with partial hydrogenation to reduce the linolenic (C-18:3) fatty acid content. Hydrogenation to improve flavor stability also produced a hard fraction in the soybean oil, which crystallized at cool temperatures similar to cottonseed oil. Winterization was employed to separate the hard and liquid fractions. Supply-and-demand economics and performance elevated partially hydrogenated winterized soybean oil to the leading winterized salad oil product in the United States. A comparison of the two winterized oil products is presented in Table 2.7. Winterization of hydrogenated soybean oil is very similar to that of cottonseed oil except that less time is required for crystallization and filtration. The inherent crystallization tendencies for the two source oils are different; the stable crystal form Table 2.7 Typical Cottonseed Oil and Partially Hydrogenated Soybean Oil Winterized Salad Oil Components
Winterized Oil
Hydrogenated Soybean Oil
Cottonseed Oil
Source Oil
Whole
Salad
Component
Oil
Oil
Fraction, %
100.0
84.6
Iodine value
109.0
113.5
Base
Salad
Stock
Oil
15.4
100.0
82.9
17.1
90.6
108.7
111.4
95.7
Stearine
Stearine
Fatty acid composition, % C-14:0 Myristic
0.9
0.9
0.7
—
—
—
C-16:0 Palmitic
24.8
21.3
38.2
11.2
10.2
15.0
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
0.5
0.5
0.3
—
—
—
C-18:0 Stearic
2.6
2.6
2.3
4.8
4.1
7.9
C-18:1 Oleic
16.9
16.9
13.8
45.4
45.2
46.0
C-18:2 Linoleic
53.7
53.7
44.2
35.4
37.5
29.1
C-18:3 Linolenic
0.2
0.2
0.1
3.0
2.8
1.9
C-20:0 Arachidic Cold test, hours
0.2
0.2
0.2
—
—
—
none
24.0
none
none
10.5
none
Fats and Oils Processing
139
for soybean oil is β, but it is β′ for cottonseed oil. β-crystals are large, coarse, and self-occluding, whereas the β′-crystals are small, needle-shaped crystals that pack together to form dense, fine structures. 2.11 dEWAXING An increased demand for salad oils high in unsaturates has resulted in the marketing of source oils that must be dewaxed to maintain clarity during storage, on the retail store shelf, and at refrigerator temperatures. Many vegetable oils have small quantities of waxes that solidify and cause cloudy oil. Several vegetable oils are solvent-extracted with the seed and hull together for operational efficiency. The seed hulls can contain waxes that are soluble in oil. Waxes are high-melting esters of fatty alcohols and fatty acids with low solubility in oils. These waxes solidify after a period of time to give the oil a cloudy appearance, an unsightly thread, or a layer of solidified material. The quantity of wax in the various vegetable oils can vary from a few hundred parts per million to over 2000 ppm. The wax content must be reduced to less than 10 ppm to ensure that the oil will not cloud or develop a wisp. The mechanisms for wax removal from oils are different from those applicable to winterization even though the same equipment can be utilized. The classical dewaxing process usually performed after prebleaching and prior to deodorization consists of carefully cooling the oil to crystallize the waxes for removal by filtration. The cooling must be done slowly under controlled conditions. A body feed approximately equal to the wax content of the oils is used to prevent blinding of the filter leaves. Without a body feed, the waxes slime over and blind the screens almost immediately.58 A continuous dewaxing process that operates efficiently with low-wax oils (500 ppm or less) has the following process flow:90 • The oil is continuously cooled with heat exchangers and a crystallizer to 43 to 46°F (6 to 8°C). • A quantity of filter aid equal to the wax content is added to the crystallizer to facilitate crystallization and filtration. • Crystallization time is four hours minimum, followed by a holding period of six hours to develop the wax crystals. • The oil is carefully heated to 64°F (18°C) before filtering to separate the wax crystals from the liquid oil.
The typical dewaxing process performs well with low-wax oils, but some vegetable oils have higher wax contents. The filtration time is increased and higher product losses are experienced with the higher wax-content oils. Some of the procedures in use to improve the dewaxing economics include:88,91 • Simultaneous dewaxing and degumming: The crude oil is cooled to approximately 77°F (25°C) and held at this temperature for 24 hours before water degumming. This process usually reduces the wax content to 200 to 400 ppm. • Wet dewaxing: The phosphatides are first removed from the oil by degumming. The oil is then cooled to 46°F (8°C), and 5% water with sodium lauryl sulfate is
140
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
added and agitated for four hours minimum to crystallize the waxes. The wax crystals should disperse in the water phase for separation with a centrifuge. • Simultaneous dewaxing and chemical refining: The oil is treated with phosphoric acid and neutralized with sodium hydroxide and centrifuged using normal refining techniques. Before water washing, the oil is cooled to 46°F (8°C) and held for four to five hours with gentle agitation. Then, 4 to 6% water is added and the mixture is heated to 64°F (18°C) with agitation. During this mixing, the wax crystals are wetted and suspended in the soapy water phase. This mixture is centrifuged to separate the water and oil phases. Usually, a second water wash is required to complete removal of the wax and soap traces from the oil. • Solvent dewaxing: This procedure is performed after prebleaching and prior to deodorization if it is not an integral part of a miscella refining process. Dewaxing in solvent consists of mixing the oil with a fixed volume of solvent and, after chilling, to promote crystallization of the waxes for separation by either filtration or with a centrifuge.
2.11.1 Dewaxing Process Control Currently, the analytical method to determine if an oil is adequately dewaxed is the same as for products winterized to remove large quantities of stearine: cold test (AOCS Method Cc 11-53).39 However, this evaluation may be very misleading. Dewaxed oil, which remains clear and brilliant for 5.5 hours, generally remains so for 24 hours in the ice bath, but the same oil can become opaque after only a few hours at room temperature due to the reappearance of waxes as well as glycerides. Therefore, to determine that an oil has been adequately dewaxed, a chill test and a cold test of 24 hours minimum should be required. The chill test consists of drying and filtering the test sample before hermetically sealing it in a 4-ounce bottle. The sample is held at 70°F (21.1°C) and examined after 24 hours for clarity. Any indication of a cloud or wisp indicates the presence of a wax or hard-oil contamination. 2.11.2 Dewaxing Applications The highly unsaturated vegetable oils marketed in the United States as salad oils, which can cloud due to wax content, are listed below with their typical wax contents. Source Oil
Typical Wax Content, %
Sunflower Oil
0.2 to 3.0
Safflower Oil
~ 0.5
Corn Oil Canola Oil
0.5 to 1.0 ~ 0.2
2.12 FRACTIONATION Edible fats and oils are fractionated to provide new materials more useful than the natural product. Edible fats and oils are complex multicomponent mixtures of
Fats and Oils Processing
141
various triglycerides with different melting points. The melting behavior and the clear point of fats are important properties for functionality in the various prepared food products. Fractionation processes separate fats and oils into fractions with different melting points. Fractionation may be practiced merely to remove an undesirable component, which is the case with dewaxing and winterization processes to produce liquid oils that resist clouding at cool temperatures. Separation of a fat or oil into fractions can also provide two or more functional products from the same original product. The production of cocoa butter equivalents or substitutes is a wellknown application for this type of fractionation. Separation of fats and oils fractions is based on the solubility of the component triglycerides. The solubility differences are directly related to the type of triglycerides in the fat system. The triglycerides types are determined by their fatty acid composition and the distribution of the fatty acids on the individual triglyceride molecule. Components of a fat or oil that differ considerably in melting point can be separated by crystallization and subsequent filtration for removal of the higher melting portions. In any practical process of fractional crystallization the potential for efficient separation of crystals from the liquid is dependent on the mechanics of separation as well as the phase behavior of the system. The successive stages of fractionation can be distinguished as:
1. Cooling of the oil to supersaturation to form the nuclei for crystallization 2. Progressive growth of the crystalline and liquid phases 3. Separation of the crystalline and liquid phases
Separation efficiency of the liquid and solid fractions depends primarily on the cooling method, which determines the crystal form and size. Fats and oils can crystallize in several polymorphic forms, specifically α, β′, and β in that order of stability, melting point, heat of fusion, and density. The rate of crystallization for the α form is higher than for the β′ form, which crystallizes quicker than the β form. Rapid cooling causes heavy supersaturation, which forms many small, shapeless, soft crystals of mixed crystal types with poor filtration properties. Gradual cooling of the oil results in stable β and β′-crystals that are easily filtered from the liquid phase. Three distinct unit processes for the fractionation of triglycerides that couple crystallization and separation process are practiced commercially to produce valueadded fractionated fats and oils: (1) dry fractionation, (2) solvent fractionation, and (3) aqueous detergent fractionation.92 Dry fractionation processes include winterization, dewaxing, hydraulic pressing, and crystal fractionation. It is the most widely practiced form of fractionation in which crystallization takes place without the aid of a solvent. The winterization process is effective for the removal of small quantities of solid fat from a large quantify of liquid oil. Dewaxing can be a variation of the winterization process to remove small quantities of waxes from certain vegetable oils rich in unsaturates. Hydraulic pressing effectively removes small quantities of liquid oil from a large quantity of solid fat. Some oils, such as palm oil, that contain high levels of both liquid and solid fractions can be effectively separated by dry fractionation. Solvent or aqueous detergent fractionation processes were both superior
142
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
to dry fractionation, but technology improvements have made the dry process more efficient than the aqueous detergent system.93 2.12.1 Dry Crystal Fractionation The advantages of fractionation were accidentally revealed to European companies with coconut oil imported from Sri Lanka in long wooden barrels called Ceylon pipes. The barrels were filled with warm coconut oil, which cooled slowly during the sea voyage to the cooler temperatures in Europe. The slow cooling, coupled with agitation from movement of the ship, caused the coconut oil to crystallize and separate into a hard and soft fraction. Customers receiving the fractionated product evaluated the properties of the components and realized that the fractions were more useful for some applications than the whole or natural products.94 Dry crystal fractionation procedures are commonly used for separation of hard stearine and soft olein fractions from natural products that contain high levels of each, such as palm oil and the lauric fats. The principle of this fractionation procedure is based on slowly cooling the oil under controlled conditions without the aid of a solvent. The stearine and olein fractions can be separated by various processes, such as filtration, centrifugation, hydraulic pressing, rotary drum, or one of the patented processes. In the dry process, large crystals are generally required for efficient separation. The large crystals tend to group together in clumps, which can trap part of the liquid olein phase. This results in a soft stearine or a low olein yield caused by the poorer separation. A low olein yield can also be experienced from the formation of mixed crystals. Controlled slow cooling of the natural oil will diminish these problems to provide cleaner separation of the olein and stearine fractions. One unique labor-intensive dry crystal fractionation process still utilized to fractionate lauric oils is to slowly cool the oil until it has a plastic consistency. This product is poured into canvas bags and cooled further to the fractionation temperature, and the crystal is allowed to stabilize or mature. Then a hydraulic press is used to squeeze the oil portion out of the stearine cake. This procedure can produce a very acceptable confectionery coating fat from palm kernel oil.94 Previously, this process was utilized to fractionate lard and tallow to produce hard fractions for use in stabilizing compound shortenings and a liquid oleo oil. High-viscosity-resistant crystallizers and high-pressure membrane filter presses have been developed to replace this labor-intensive process for high-quality specialty fats.93 2.12.2 Detergent Fractionation The aqueous detergent fractionation procedure utilizes the same basic principals of dry fractionation, that is, crystallization is induced by cooling the oil under controlled conditions without the addition of a solvent.94,95 The difference is that an aqueous detergent solution is added to the crystallized material to assist in the separation of the liquid olein and the solid stearine. The aqueous solution contains about 5% of a detergent, such as sodium lauryl sulfate, which preferentially wets the surface of the crystals displacing the liquid oil. About 2% of an electrolyte, such
Fats and Oils Processing
143
as magnesium or aluminum sulfate, is added to the solution to assist in uniting the liquid olein droplets. Separation is then effected with a centrifuge. The heavier phase containing the stearine is heated to melt the stearine and separate the oil and water phases. Complete separation of these phases is accomplished with a second centrifuge. Interest in this process for food products has declined due to the operating costs, potential contamination of the fractions, and improvements in the dry fractionation processes to provide products with equivalent results.93 2.12.3 Solvent Fractionation Solvent fractionation is an expensive process that can be justified only for preparation of value-added, high-quality products. The ultimate objective for the use of solvent fractionation technology is commercial production of fats and oils products with unique properties. Fractional crystallization from dilute solution results in more efficient separation with improved yields, reduced processing times, and increased purity than can be achieved by fractionation carried out without a solvent. The attractive benefits are partially, and for some products completely, offset by high capital costs for the handling and recovery of the solvents as well as increased cooling capacity requirements. Some of the product categories that have utilized solvent fractionation technology to produce products with unique functional characteristics include: • Cocoa butter equivalents (CBEs): CBEs are fats with chemical compositions similar to cocoa butter and capable of replacing it in any proportion in chocolates. • Lauric cocoa butter replacers (CBRs): These are products made from fractionated coconut or palm kernel oils with physical properties closely resembling cocoa butter. • Nonlauric CBRs: The most widely used products in this classification are based on solvent-fractionated, hydrogenated liquid oils, such as soybean, cottonseed, and palm oils. • Confectionery products: Fat systems with a low melting point but a high SFI content at room temperature can provide products with a quick melt at body temperature, which results in a cooling sensation when eaten. High-quality candy centers and whipped toppings are two specific applications for fractionated products. • Medium-chain triglycerides: Lauric oil fractions containing C-6:0, C-8:0, and C-10:0 saturated fatty acids, which are soluble in both oil and water systems for quick absorption by the body and transported via the portal system. • High-stability liquid oils: Modification of oils by utilization of hydrogenation with fractionation has permitted the development of liquid oils with high resistance to oxidative degradation. Liquid oils with an active oxygen method (AOM) stability of 350 hours are available commercially.
Commercially, solvent fractionation is carried out by a number of different processes that may be batch, semicontinuous, or continuous.95,96 Crystallizers, filters, and solvent recovery systems can differ in design, and one of several organic solvents may be employed. Solvents that have been used include acetone, hexane, and 2-nitropropane. Some of the processes are protected by patent and are proprietary, but all require control of certain process parameters:
144
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
• Feedstock selection, which can include natural oils and blends, hydrogenated oils and blends, randomly rearranged oils and blends, and blends of any or all of these • Concentration of the fat in the solvent • Fractionation temperature • Cooling rate and residence time in the crystallizer • Separation conditions
A typical solvent fractionation process flow usually begins with heating the feedstock oil to a temperature above the completed melting point and blending with warm solvent in the ratio of 1 part oil to between 3 and 5 parts solvent by weight. The solution is then cooled to crystallize the hard fractions. Crystallization temperatures vary, depending on the nature of the solvent, the concentration of oil in the solution, and the characteristics needed in the final fractions. For example, for lauric oils in acetone solvent, temperatures of 28 to 68°F (–2 to 20°C) have been used to obtain stearine iodine values of 1.8 to 8.3. The crystallized slurry is separated by filtration or by a settling technique. The solid material is then stripped of solvent for one fraction. Removal of the solvent from the filtrate yields another fraction. Further fractionation may then be achieved by redissolving either fraction and repeating the process. 2.13 POSTBLEACHING A separate bleaching operation for products modified by hydrogenation, interesterification, and fractionation has three general purposes: (1) to remove prooxidant metals, (2) to remove undesirable colors, and (3) to remove peroxides and secondary oxidation products. This bleaching process generally employs a bleaching earth to adsorb soaps, colors, and oxidation products and a metal-chelating acid to reduce the metal contaminates to the lowest possible levels. Green colors can emerge in the modified oils because of the heat bleaching of yellow and red masking pigments during the modification processes. The carotenoid pigments can be heat bleached to a colorless form while the chlorophyllic pigments merely have their absorption maxima shifted from 660 to 640 µm. After removal of the masking red-yellow pigments, the green chlorophyll pigments predominate, resulting in oils that appear green. Chlorophyll and its derivatives are able to transfer energy from light to other molecules. Singlet oxygen formed during this transfer reacts 1500 times faster with unsaturated fatty acids than ground-state oxygen. Chlorophyll also degrades to pheophytins and pheophorbides during processing, which also accelerates oxidation.97 Chlorophyll can be removed by adsorption on acid-activated clays with some difficulty, depending on the severity. Green colors are more easily removed in the prebleach process before heating has set the color during hydrogenation. Hydrogenated oils can retain as much as 50-ppm nickel, mostly in colloidal form, after the black press filtration. After postbleaching, the nickel content of hydrogenated oils should be reduced to <0.1-ppm nickel and <0.02-ppm copper. Interesterified oils develop a reddish-brown color during the reaction and soaps are produced with the
Fats and Oils Processing
145
deactivation of the chemical catalyst. The catalyst is inactivated with the addition of water or acid (citric or phosphoric) solution.98 The inactivated catalyst or soaps and the brown color are adsorbed by the bleaching earth during post bleaching.99 During fractionation, the natural antioxidants accumulate in the liquid fraction and the metal contaminates accumulate in the stearin fraction. Postbleaching of the stearin fraction with acid and bleaching earth chelates and removes the prooxidant metals. Postbleach systems can be exact duplicates of the prebleach process; however, most fats and oils processors prefer batch systems to continuous systems due to the production of a wide variety of modified basestocks from several different source oils. Vacuum batch systems are normally selected over atmospheric processes for the oxidative protection afforded the oils. The bleaching conditions are normally 0.1 to 0.2% activated bleaching earth with ~10 ppm phosphoric acid or 50 ppm citric acid added as a chelating agent and bleached at 180°F (82.2°C) under a 25-inch mercury (Hg) minimum vacuum. After bleaching, the spent earth and adsorbed impurities are removed with a pressure filter and the oil is cooled to 130°F (54.4°C) before further processing or before being inventoried for basestock blending. 2.14 CHOLESTEROL STRIPPING PROCESS Animal fats were replaced with hydrogenated vegetable oils in the 1980s principally because of a belief that dietary cholesterol increased blood cholesterol levels. Cholesterol is the main sterol component of animal fat and fish oils. A process for stripping cholesterol from animal fats was commercialized in 1990. The fat is deaerated under a vacuum and mixed with steam. This mixture is fed into a chamber where it is flash vaporized, and then cascaded down an alternating series of heated jackets and disks against a counter-current of steam to vaporize the cholesterol fraction. The process removes 90 to 94% of the cholesterol in less than 5 minutes.100 Stripped tallow should retain a calculated 88 (± 24)-ppm cholesterol level, which is only slightly higher than the cholesterol level in vegetable oils. This level may be further reduced by blending with a vegetable oil with low cholesterol content. Animal fats have also been avoided due high-saturated fatty acid contents. Hydrogenated vegetable oils, which replaced the animal fats in most cases, have high contents of trans fatty acids. A comparison of restaurant-type frying shortenings made with hydrogenated vegetable oils and with cholesterol-stripped tallow and RBD (refined, bleached, deodorized) cottonseed oil indicate that the tallow product has a lower combined level of saturated and trans fatty acids: Saturated and Trans Levels Comparisons Source Oils
Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil
Tallow and Cottonseed Oil 43.8
Saturated Fatty Acids, %
25.6
Trans Fatty Acids, %
39.5
0.4
Combined Total
65.1
44.2
146
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
2.15 ESTERIFICATION OR ALCOHOLYSIS Emulsifiers are usually made either by alcoholysis or by direct esterification. In direct esterification, fatty acids and polyalcohols are reacted together under controlled conditions to form esters. In alcoholysis, fats are reacted with polyalcohols to make the surfactants. For example, the production of mono- and diglycerides from fat is an alcoholysis reaction with glycerine as the alcohol. Mono- and diglycerides were the first fatty emulsifiers to be added to foods. These emulsifiers were first used in margarine for Danish pastry and puff pastry shortening. The first U.S. patents for mono- and diglycerides granted in 1938 disclosed the usefulness of surfactants in emulsions and margarine.101 Monoglycerides with only one fatty acid attached to a glycerol molecule and two free hydroxyl groups on the glycerol take on the properties of both fats and water. The fatty acid portion of the molecule acts like any other fat and readily mixes with the fatty materials, whereas the two hydroxyl groups mix or dissolve in water, thus, monoglycerides tend to hold fats and water together. Cake shortenings that offered increased aerating, creaming, and moisture retention properties contributed by the addition of mono- and diglycerides were introduced in 1933, with patents also granted in 1938. Shelf-life extension properties for yeast-raised products with the addition of mono- and diglyceride were introduced soon after to bread bakers.101 Since that time, the uses and demand for food emulsifiers have grown dramatically, and several other emulsifiers have been developed. Most of the fatty emulsifiers produced are either monoglyceride derivatives or utilize an alcohol other than glycerine, such as propylene glycol monoester (PGME) or polyglycerol ester (PGE). Examples of the monoglyceride derivatives include ethoxylated monoglycerides, acetylated monoglycerides, and succinylated monoglycerides. Emulsifier production is generally performed in versatile batch equipment that is used for a variety of different surfactants. Acid-resistant construction for the tankage and reactors is one or another variant of the 300 series stainless steels. The use of these alloys essentially eliminates the possibility of iron and other metal contamination that may either degrade the product or catalyze undesirable oxidation or have other side reactions. Typically, type 304 stainless steel is used for fatty chemical processes where the temperature does not exceed 300°F (150°C), and type 316 is used for temperatures above this level.102 Internal reactor coils capable of handling high-pressure steam and cooling water, as well as a vacuum system with 0.1-mmHg capabilities, are necessary for emulsifier reactors. A condenser for the recovery of the excess glycerine, glycol, or other alcohols should be sized for the largest volume of the polyalcohol to be recovered. 2.15.1 Mono- and Diglycerides Mono- and diglycerides are the most dominate food emulsifier both from the standpoint of total use and breadth of use. The mono- and diglycerides consist of glycerol esters of various edible fatty acids and fat blends. Three types of standard monoand diglycerides are manufactured: 40 to 46% α-monoglyceride content, 52 to 56%
Fats and Oils Processing
147
α-monoglyceride content, and distilled monoglycerides with 90% α-monoglyceride content. There are three basic physical forms of mono- and diglycerides: hard, soft, and intermediate. The differences in the emulsifier consistency is determined by the physical characteristics of the edible fat or oil used in the reaction. The consistency of the mono- and diglyceride, as indicated by the iodine value or melting point, determines the functionality of the emulsifier. Generally, a higher melting point emulsifier is preferred when a tight emulsion is desired, whereas the lower melting or softer products provide better aeration qualities. Intermediate-hardness monoand diglycerides are compromise products suitable, to a degree, for both application ranges, but not specific for either. Most of the mono- and diglyceride requirements are produced by glycerolysis of triglycerides or fats and oils. In this process, fats and oils of the desired hardness are mixed with an excess of glycerine at elevated temperatures in the presence of an alkaline catalyst, usually either sodium or calcium hydroxide. The reaction mixture is kept at an elevated temperature until the fatty acid radicals of the triglycerides are redistributed at random among the available hydroxyl groups of the glycerine. The reaction mixture is cooled after equilibrium has been attained, and the catalyst is “killed” or deactivated by the addition of a food acid, normally phosphoric acid. The phosphate salts that result from the catalyst neutralization must be removed by filtration. The excess glycerine will separate as a lower layer upon cooling and can be partially removed by decanting. The glycerine that remains dissolved in the reaction mixture must be removed by vacuum distillation during steam stripping to reduce the FFA content and remove the oxidation materials that contribute to undesirable flavors and odors. This process yields substantial amounts of monoglycerides in addition to diglycerides and triglycerides with altered or rearranged structures and free glycerine. The proportion of monoglyceride to diglyceride may be controlled, depending on the relative proportion of reactants, temperature, time, catalyst, and use of stripping steam or inert gas. The normal distribution is 50% monoglycerides, 40% diglycerides, and 10% triglycerides. Approximately 85% of the monoglycerides are esterified on the α position of the glyceride, the balance being esterified on the center or β-hydroxyl group. The composition of this mixture can be changed by reducing the amount of glycerine added or by changing reaction temperature and catalyst level. Most of the mono- and diglyceride emulsifiers made contain about 50% monoglycerides, but 60% monoglyceride levels can be attained. Higher monoglyceride contents can be obtained by distillation of the mono- and diglyceride products. The amount of fat that will react with the specified amount of glycerine varies with the molecular weight of the fat involved. A product with a high molecular weight, such as soybean oil, requires more fat per pound of mono- and diglycerides produced than does a lower molecular weight product, such as tallow or cottonseed oil. On the basis of typical fatty acid compositions, the average molecular weight for hydrogenated soybean oil containing 3% oleic acid is 882.6, whereas the corresponding molecular weight for hydrogenated tallow triglyceride is 858.7. Theoretically, it would require 89.37 pounds of hydrogenated soybean oil to produce
148
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
100 pounds of glycerine-free mono- and diglycerides, whereas it would require only 88.15 pounds of hydrogenated tallow to produce the same amount of mono- and diglycerides. Because it is difficult to strip all the glycerine from the finished emulsifier, the above fat requirements become 88.9 pounds of hydrogenated soybean oil for a mono- and diglyceride containing 0.5% free glycerine and 87.7 pounds of hydrogenated tallow to yield 100 pounds of mono- and diglycerides, again containing 0.5% free glycerine. Mono- and diglycerides can be manufactured with either a batch or a continuous process; however, a large proportion of the U.S. demand is still produced with batch systems where the reaction time, temperature, and catalyst may be varied. A typical batch process flow to produce a 40 to 46% α-monoglyceride emulsifier is detailed in Figure 2.9. For continuous processing, the process time is considerably less than that required for batch systems, probably less than 30 minutes total, which is promoted, in part, by the higher reaction temperatures employed; however, the total pounds per man-hour may be equivalent to those produced by a batch system. Concentrations of monoglycerides to produce the 90% α-monoglyceride products is achieved by distillation of the mono- and diglyceride emulsifiers. Prior to the actual concentration, the free glycerine content has to be removed to preserve the monoglyceride content. The reaction between triglycerides and glycerine is reversible, especially in the presence of catalyst and at elevated temperatures. Additionally, monoglycerides are not heat stable and have only limited heat tolerance, so thermal damage must be avoided. Molecular distillation is evaporative distillation where a compound in the liquid state evaporates without boiling because the high vacuum removes the effect of atmospheric pressure. Monoglycerides vaporize leaving the heavier di- and triglycerides behind in the distillation residue.101 The residue is recycled to produce additional mono- and diglycerides for subsequent distillation until the product color becomes too dark. 2.15.1.1 Monoglyceride Derivatives Monoglycerides not only are used as surfactants as produced, but also can be further modified to produce other surface-active products suitable for use in prepared foods. The multiple reactive groups of the monoglycerides allow the formation of other functional emulsifiers. One or both of the hydroxyl groups can be replaced by different groups to form esters with specialized functionality characteristics. Modified monoglyceride surfactants can be obtained by treating monoglycerides with an acid, acid anhydrides, acid chloride, or another ester. Some of the monoglyceride derivatives produced include the following:
1. The lactoglycerides comprise an important series of edible emulsifiers that are derived from monoglycerides or mixtures of mono- and diglycerides. Lactostearin can be made by subjecting low-iodine-value hydrogenated soybean oil to glycerolysis, using sodium or calcium hydroxide as a catalyst and then esterifying this mixture directly with lactic acid, followed by water washing to remove the bitter-tasting triglycerides of lactic acid. The resultant product can be identified as
Fats and Oils Processing
149
Glycerine 20%
Basestock 80%
Drying & Deaeration Vacuum, 5 to 10mm Hg 220 to 240°F Mechanical Agitation ca. 30 minutes Sodium or Calcium Hydroxide 0.10%
Catalyst Addition Atmospheric Nitrogen Blanket Mechanical Agitation Drying & Deaeration Vacuum, 5 to 10mm Hg 220 to 240°F Mechanical Agitation ca. 15 minutes Reaction 425 to 440°F Mechanical Agitation ca 30 to 60 minutes Cooling Mechanical Agitation 350°F
Phosphoric Acid 0.10%
Catalyst Neutralization Mechanical Agitation ca. 350°F
Steam Initiate at 200°F Vapor Temperature
Stripping Vacuum, 1 to 6mm Hg 350°F ca. 11/2 to 2 hours
Recovered Glycerine ca. 10.4%
Cooling Vacuum, 1 to 6mm Hg Mechanical Agitation 140 to 190°F Filtration 140 to 160°F Nitrogen protection Mechanical Agitation Mono- and Diglycerides 42±2% Alpha Mono ca. 89.6% Figure 2.9 Mono- and diglyceride batch process flow.
Calcium or Sodium Salts
150
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
glyceryl lactostearate and mono- and diglycerides.103 The lactylated monoglyceride surfactants are utilized primarily for aeration in cakes and whipped toppings. 2. Acetylated monoglycerides are characterized by sharp melting points with a waxy, rather than a greasy, feel. The physical and functional properties of a particular acetylated monoglyceride depend on the triglyceride from which it is made and the degree of acetylation. Monoacetylated or partially acetylated monoglyceride molecules each contain one long-chain fatty acid plus one acetyl group and one hydroxyl group. Diacetylated or fully acetylated monoglyceride molecules each contain one long-chain fatty acid and two acetyl groups. Acetylated monoglycerides may be produced by either of the following procedures: a. Direct acetylation of monoglycerides with acetic anhydride without a catalyst or molecular distillation with the acetic acid, acetic anhydride, and triacetin removed by vacuum distillation. b. Interesterification of edible fats and oils with triacetin in the presence of a catalyst, followed by molecular distillation or steam stripping. Acetylated monoglycerides are stable in the α-crystal form. These α-crystallinetending emulsifiers promote the agglomeration of the dispersed fat globules that induce clumping of fat globules into clusters to form structural networks in whipped toppings and other foams. Saturated monoglycerides can be stabilized in the active α-crystalline form with the addition of acetylated monoglycerides. 3. Ethoxylated mono- and diglycerides labeled as “polyglycerate 60” are formed when 20 moles of ethylene oxide are reacted with a mono- and diglyceride. The reaction is carried out at 265 to 325°F (130 to 165°C) under pressure because ethylene oxide is a gas catalyzed by a base such as sodium hydroxide. The polymerized ethylene oxide chains combine with the mono- and diglycerides to produce an effective emulsifier with strong hydrophilic characteristics. The presence of many ether oxygen atoms in the polyoxyethylene chains offers sites for hydrogen bonding to water molecules and proteins.101 The physical form contributed by the triglyceride basestock has a direct affect upon functionality, that is, firm consistencies are preferred for yeast-raised products and soft consistencies provide better aeration properties for cakes and icings. 4. Succinylation of monoglycerides changes the properties of the surfactant from one with essentially only bread-softening properties to one with both softening and dough-strengthening properties. This product is manufactured by reacting monoglyceride with succinic anhydride at temperatures ranging from 175 to 350°F (80 to 180°C). At high temperatures, no catalyst is required, but, at reaction temperatures below 200°F (95°C), a low level of an alkaline catalyst may be needed to accelerate the reaction.104
2.15.2 Polyglycerol Ester Polyglycerol esters have unique physical and chemical properties that provide a broad range of functional properties.105,106 Polyglycerols are polymers formed by the dehydration of glycerine. For each molecule of glycerine added to the polymer, there is an increase of one hydroxyl group. The potential number of different possible polyglycerol esters is almost limitless, depending on the degree of glycerine polymerization. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations have approved these surfactants, ranging up to and including decaglycerol esters of edible fats and
Fats and Oils Processing
151
oils from corn, cottonseed, peanut, safflower, sesame, soybean, lard, palm, and tallow. The polyglycerol esters are functional in a very broad range of applications, either singly or blended with other emulsifiers, to include crystal inhibitors; aeration of batters, icings, fillings, and toppings; antispattering agents for cooking oils and margarine; low-fat products; ice cream and mellorine; confectionery antibloom agents; viscosity control; nondairy creamers; cake mixes; lubricants; and others. The esters are made by reacting fat with glycerine that has been polymerized into polyglycerols at high temperatures. To a degree, the polymerization can be controlled to produce varying amounts of diglycerol, triglycerol, tetraglycerol, etc. Two molecules of glycerol will combine to form diglycerol and a molecule of water. The diglycerol is then transformed into triglycerol as another glycerol molecule is added. The water released by the polymerization distills from the reaction mixture at the high temperature used and is lost. Similarly, tetraglycerol and the higher polymers can be formed from triglycerol. During polymerization of glycerol, these reactions are all occurring at the same time, but at different rates. Thus, the polymerized product is a mixture of glycerol and various polymers, with the actual composition depending on polymerizing conditions and its extent. The average molecular weight of the polyglycerol mixture can be either low or high, depending on the extent of the polymerization, with the number of hydroxyl groups per molecule or sites for esterification with fatty acids increasing as the molecular weight increases. Variations in molecular weight of the polyglycerol or the fatty acids and in the fatty acid/polyglycerol ratio will change the solubility characteristics and emulsification properties of the reaction product. The following procedure has been utilized to polymerize glycerine and esterify the polyglycerol and triglyceride basestock in the same reaction vessel:
1. Charge the reactor with glycerine. 2. Add 1.0% sodium hydroxide (dry basis) to the glycerine while agitating. 3. Start heating and sparge nitrogen through the mixture to provide a positive nitrogen flow through the reactor outlet through a condenser. Care must be exercised to exclude air from the system. Traces of oxygen lead to the formation of acrolein as well as a dark color that is difficult to bleach. 4. Heat to 480 to 500°F (250 to 260°C) and hold while continuing the nitrogen sparge to carry off the liberated water. 5. Determine the polymerization process endpoint using the refractive index or measurement of the liberated water removed. 6. Cool the polyglycerol mixture. 7. Add the triglyceride basestock at equal proportions to the polyglycerol weight while sparging with nitrogen. 8. Stop the nitrogen sparge and initiate a vacuum on the reactor. 9. Heat and maintain the mixture at 410 to 425°F (210 to 220°C) for two hours. Approximately 20% of the glycerol should be removed and recovered during the reaction. 10. Cool the polyglycerol ester before exposing it to the atmosphere. From this point, the polyglycerol esters can be treated much the same as triglycerides. They can be bleached and deodorized by the usual procedures used with fats and oils.
152
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
2.15.3 Propylene Glycol Monoester Propylene glycol has the same carbon chain length as glycerine, but it has only two hydroxyl groups. Commonly used propylene glycol monoesters are generally more lipophilic than many glycerol monoesters because they have fewer free hydroxyl groups. Alcoholysis of triglycerides with propylene glycol leads to mixed partial glycol–glycerol esters or propylene glycol mono- and diesters and mono- and diglycerides. Propylene glycol monoesters are α-crystalline-tending, surface-active compounds that have proved to be especially effective emulsifiers for cake baking and whipped toppings. The emulsifier forms an α-crystalline film around entrapped air bubbles to stabilize the food systems. The process for the preparation of PGME emulsifiers is similar to that used for the manufacture of mono- and diglyceride emulsifiers, except that propylene glycol is reacted with the fat base. Mono- and diesters of propylene glycol are formed and glycerine is liberated from the triglyceride. Some of the liberated glycerine reacts with some of the fat present, forming mono- and diglycerides following the same reaction used for mono- and diglyceride preparation. The propylene glycol monoester composition will vary depending on the mixture to reaction. A reaction mixture of basefat and pure propylene glycol should yield approximately 70% propylene glycol monoesters and 10% monoglyceride, with the balance consisting of propylene glycol diesters, diglycerides, and a small amount of triglyceride. 2.16 bLENDING Basestocks are blended to produce the specified composition, consistency, and stability requirements for the various edible fat and oil products, such as shortenings, frying fats, margarine oils, specialty products, and even some salad oils. The basestocks may be composed of hydrogenated fats and oils, interesterified products (refined and bleached oils), or fractions from winterization, dewaxing, or fractionation. The products are blended to meet both the composition and analytical consistency controls identified by the product developers and quality assurance. The consistency controls frequently include analytical evaluations for solids fat index, iodine value, melting points, fatty acid composition, etc. Basestocks should not be blended with a disregard for either specified composition or analytical requirements. It is often possible to meet the specified analytical requirements with several different basestock compositions; however, only the specified composition will perform properly, have the required oxidative stability, or conform to the nutritional and ingredient statements. The blending process requires scale tanks and meters to proportion the basestocks accurately for each different product. The blend tanks should be equipped with mechanical agitators and heating coils to ensure a uniform blend for consistency control. Capacities of the blend tanks should be sized to accommodate the next process, probably deodorization. Nitrogen protection should be provided for the
Fats and Oils Processing
153
long holding times required to perform some of the analytical evaluations. A typical blending process sequence is
1. Determine the proportions for each basestock for the product to be blended. 2. Add the basestocks to the blend tank at the identified proportions. 3. Heat the blend, if necessary, to the specified temperature and agitate for 20 minutes. 4. Sample and submit to the laboratory for the specified analysis. 5. Transfer to the next process if the analytical characteristics meet the specified limits. 6. Adjust blends outside the specified limits to bring them into the allowed consistency control ranges; however, use only specified basestocks within the allowed ranges for any adjustments. 7. Resample the adjusted blend after agitating for 20 minutes to achieve a uniform product and resubmit to the laboratory for consistency analysis. 8. Transfer to the next process after the specified analytical objectives have been met.
2.17 DEODORIZATION In the early stages of the development of the edible fats and oils industry, offensive odors and flavors were not a problem. Lard and butter were consumed in the same form as produced, and the natural flavors were considered an asset. Olive oil, one of the earliest known vegetable oils, was and still is used for its distinctive flavor. However, the rapid expansion of cotton acreage at the end of the nineteenth century resulted in large quantities of cottonseed oil, which presented an economic incentive to use this vegetable oil. Caustic refined and bleached cottonseed oil was offered as a cooking or salad oil and blended with tallow or olein stearine as a lard substitute. These products enjoyed a price advantage over lard and olive oil, but the unpleasant flavor was so strong that acceptance was poor. In addition, the hydrogenation process developed to harden vegetable oils imparted a more disagreeable flavor and odor to the oils. Attempts to remove the flavor and odors chemically or to mask them with spices or flavors were unsuccessful. The first successful attempt at removing the disagreeable odors and flavors from a fat and oil consisted of injecting live steam into an oil at high temperatures. It was discovered in England, but this flavor-improvement process was soon adapted by most American fats and oils processors. The advantages of treating oils with steam to remove offensive flavors and odors was recognized in the early 1890s by Henry Eckstein. David Wesson improved the process by using higher temperatures and maintaining the oil under vacuum while blowing with superheated steam.107,108 Deodorization is a vacuum-steam distillation process of an oil at an elevated temperature during which FFA and minute levels of odoriferous materials are removed to obtain a bland and odorless oil.108-115 Most vegetable oils retain characteristic undesirable flavors and odors and obtain others during processing. Bleaching imparts an “earthy” flavor and odor, and hydrogenation adds an odor and flavor that can be described only as typical and certainly undesirable. The odoriferous
154
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
substances are FFA, aldehydes, ketones, peroxides, alcohols, and other organic compounds. Additionally, certain carotenoid pigments are destroyed, resulting in a heat-bleaching effect. Efficient removal of these substances depends on their vapor pressure, for a given constituent is a function of the temperature and increases with the temperature. Deodorization is the last major processing step during which the flavor and odor and many of the stability qualities of an oil can be affected. From this point forward, effort is directed toward retaining the quality that the deodorized oil possesses, therefore, considerable care must be given to the selection, operation, and maintenance of the deodorizer equipment and the operating conditions. 2.17.1 Operating Variables Deodorization conditions depend on the particular oil type, the oil quality, and the refining system used. A shift in refining technology toward physical refining where the FFA is removed exclusively by steam distillation requires more severe conditions than chemically refined oils. With chemical refining, most of the FFA content has been neutralized before deodorization. Physically refined oils have FFA contents between 1.0 and 5.0% compared to 0.05 to 0.1% for chemically refined oils. The steam distillation requirements for both physical and chemically refined oils can be achieved by altering one or more of the operating variables. The four interrelated operating variables that influence deodorized oil quality are vacuum, temperature, stripping-steam rate, and holding time at deodorization temperatures. 2.17.1.1 Vacuum The low absolute pressure necessary for low-temperature distillation of the odoriferous substances is affected by the vacuum system. The boiling point of the fatty acids and the vapor pressure of the odoriferous materials decrease as the absolute pressures decreases.115 The required low absolute pressure, usually between 2 and 4 mbar, is commonly generated by vacuum systems consisting of a combination of steam jet ejectors, vapor condensers, and mechanical vacuum pumps. Special vacuum systems have been developed to reach lower pressures and operating costs and, at the same time, reduce emissions by a more efficient condensing of the volatiles. In the dry condensing systems, the sparge steam is condensed on surface condensers working alternatively. The remaining noncondensables are removed by mechanical pumps or by a vacuum ejector system.113 2.17.1.2 Temperature Deodorization temperatures must be high enough to make the vapor pressure of the volatile impurities in the oil conveniently high. The vapor pressure of the odoriferous materials increases rapidly as the temperature of the fat is increased. For example, the vapor pressure of palmitic fatty acid is 1.8 mm at 350°F (176.7°C), 7.4 mm at 400°F (204.4°C), 25.0 mm at 450°F (232.2°C), and 72 mm at 500° F (260°C). Assuming that the vapor pressure–temperature relationship for all the odoriferous
Fats and Oils Processing
155
materials is similar to that of palmitic fatty acid, each 50°F (27.8°C) deodorizer temperature increase would triple the odoriferous material removal rate. Or, stated another way, it would take nine times as long to deodorize an oil at 350°F (177°C) than at 450°F (232°C). Higher deodorizer temperatures definitely provide shorter deodorization times; however, excessive temperature results in the development of the polymerization, isomerization to produce trans acids, thermal cracking with formation of odoriferous and low boiling products, color reversion, and distillation of tocopherols. Generally, trans formation during deodorization is negligible below 428°F (220°C), becomes significant between 428 and 464°F (220 and 240°C), and is nearly exponential above 464°F (240°C). Thermal degradation of the tocopherols becomes significant at deodorization temperatures above 500°F (260°C).113 It has been determined that twice as many tocopherols and sterols are stripped out at 525°F (275°C) as at 465°F (240°C), and that pressure variations of 2 to 6 mbar had only a slight effect on tocopherol/sterol stripping. Deodorizer operation at elevated temperatures can also promote thermal decomposition of some constituents naturally present in oils, such as pigments and some trace metal–prooxidant complexes. The carotenoid pigments can be decomposed and removed by deodorization beginning at 446°F (230°C), therefore, a compromise must be determined between time and temperature for deodorizing particular fats and oils. Optimum deodorizer operating temperatures vary from product to product. In general, animal fats require less stringent conditions than the vegetable oil products. Chemically refined oils are easier to deodorize than physically refined oils due to lower FFA levels and more effective removal of polar components, oxidation products, and pigments. Among the vegetable oils, those containing relatively short-chain fatty acids, such as coconut and palm kernel oils, require lower deodorization temperatures than the domestic oils composed of longer chain fatty acids. Hydrogenated oils are usually more difficult to deodorize because of higher FFA contents and the distinctive odor imparted by the hydrogenation reaction. Corn oils usually require a higher temperature or longer residence time to achieve the desired heat bleach. In general, deodorization temperatures will vary from 400 to 475°F (204 to 246°C) and, in some cases, as high as 525°F (274°C). 2.17.1.3 Stripping Steam Adequate stripping steam, consistent with the temperature and pressure in the deodorizer, is required. The amount of stripping steam required is a function of both the absolute operating pressure and the mixing efficiency of the equipment design. Agitation of the oil, necessary to constantly expose new oil surfaces to the low absolute pressure, is accomplished by the use of carefully distributed stripping steam. Therefore, oil depth is a primary factor for establishing both the stripping steam requirement and the deodorizing or holding time. The quantity of fatty acids distilled with each pound of steam is directly proportional to the vapor pressure of the fatty acids. Effective steam stripping is dependent on volume, for example, 1-mbar operation will require a lower weight percentage of stripping steam than will 6-mbar operation. Differences among the source oils also affect steam requirements,
156
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
for example, canola oil requires more steam than soybean oil to remove the odor. Excessive live steam may cause hydrolysis and increased energy consumption for the vacuum system. Typical stripping steam deodorization conditions for chemically refined oils are 5 to 15 wt% of oil for batch systems and 0.5 to 2% for continuous and semicontinuous deodorizer systems. 2.17.1.4 Retention Time Deodorizer holding time is the period during which the fat or oil is at deodorizing temperature and subjected to stripping steam. Stripping time for efficient deodorization has to be long enough to reduce the odoriferous components of the fats and oils products to the required level. This time will vary with the equipment design. For example, a batch deodorizer with an 8- to 10-foot depth of oil above the sparging steam distributor will require a longer deodorization time than will a continuous or semicontinuous system that treats shallow layers of oil. Typically, the holding time at elevated temperatures for batch deodorizer systems is three to eight hours, whereas the holding time for continuous and semicontinuous systems vary from 15 to 120 minutes. Additionally, certain reactions with the oils deodorized are not related to removal of FFA, but instead help provide a stable oil after deodorization. These reactions and the heat bleaching are time and temperature dependent, thus deodorizing systems provide a retention period at deodorizing temperatures to allow these reactions and the heat bleaching to occur.110 2.17.2 Deodorization Systems Deodorization equipment in current use can be classified into three principal groups: batch, continuous, and semicontinuous. The system choice depends on several factors, such as the number of feedstock changes, heat recovery, investment, operating costs, ecology requirements, physical or chemical refining, and so forth. 2.17.2.1 Batch This is basically the simplest type of deodorization system that can be installed. The principal component parts consist of a vessel in the form of a vertical cylinder with dished or cone heads. The vessel is fabricated from type 304 stainless steel to avoid the deleterious catalytic activity of copper and iron on oils, welded to prevent air leaks, and well insulated to minimize heat loss. The usual range of capacity is 10,000 to 40,000 pounds, although the preference appears to be batch sizes of 15,000 to 30,000 pounds. Vessel diameters are usually chosen to give a depth of 8 to 10 feet of oil and have a similar amount of headspace above the surface of the oil. It is necessary to allow sufficient head space to avoid excessive entrainment losses from the rolling and splashing of the oil caused by the injected steam. Stripping steam is injected into the bottom of the vessel through a distributor. In addition to the steam ejector system, means for heating, cooling, pumping, and filtering the oil are required. The batch
Fats and Oils Processing
157
system controls include a device for indicating oil temperature and a pressure gauge designed to indicate accurately low pressures within the deodorizer. Equipment operating at a high temperature and 6- to 12-mbar pressure requires about eight hours for a complete deodorization cycle of charging, heating, deodorizing, cooling, and discharging the oil. Some systems operating at higher pressures or lower deodorization temperatures may require as long as 10 to 12 hours for a deodorization cycle. The total amount of stripping steam required may vary from approximately 10 to 50 pounds per 100 pounds of oil, with the average usage probably about 25 pounds per 100 pounds of oil. The stripping steam is ordinarily injected at 3 pounds per 100 pounds of oil per hour at 6-mbar pressure. The oil must be cooled to as low a temperature as practicable after deodorization before it is discharged to atmospheric conditions to minimize oxidation. A temperature of 100 to 120°F (38 to 49°C) is preferred for liquid oils, with higher temperatures being necessary for higher melting products, but still maintained as low as possible. Batch deodorization has the advantage of simplicity of design, flexibility, and ease of operation. It can be operated for as long or as short a period as required, with frequent product and even deodorization condition changes. Mechanically, batch deodorizer systems require very little maintenance; however, the cost of utilities for batch deodorization is considerably higher than for the continuous or semicontinuous systems. Batch systems do not provide a convenient means of recovering any substantial portion of the heat required, they have a high stripping steam consumption and they require large vacuum systems with high steam and water requirements. But, the lower labor and capitalization costs for the original installation may offset a portion of the higher utility costs.111 2.17.2.2 Semicontinuous Deodorization These systems operate on the basis of handling finite batches of oil in a timed sequence of deaeration-heating, holding-steam stripping, and cooling such that each quantum of oil is completely subjected to each condition before proceeding to the next step. The semicontinuous deodorizer consists principally of a tall cylindrical shell of carbon steel construction with five or more type 304 stainless steel trays stacked inside of, but not quite in contact with, the outer shell. Each tray is fitted with a steam sparge and is capable of holding a measured batch of oil. By means of a measuring tank, oil is charged to the top tray where it is deaerated while being heated with steam to about 320 to 330°F (160 to 166°C). At the end of the heating period, the charge is automatically dropped to the second tray, and the top tray is refilled. In the second tray, the oil is heated to the operating temperature and again after a timed period is automatically dropped to the tray below. When the oil reaches the bottom tray, it is cooled to 100 to 130°F (38 to 54°C) and discharged to a drop tank from which it is pumped through a polishing filter to storage. Semicontinuous deodorizers are usually automated and controlled from a central panel with a time-cycle controller and interlocks such that the sequence steps are interrupted in the event of insufficient batch size, improper drop-valve opening or closing, or the oil not reaching the preset heating or cooling temperatures in the allotted time.111
158
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
One of the principal advantages of the semicontinuous deodorization system derives from the fact that all of the trays are under the same relatively high vacuum. All oil receives substantially identical treatment, and the annular space between the trays and the shell provides some insurance against oxidation due to inward leakage of air. The deodorizer arrangement avoids refluxing of once-distilled undesirable materials back into the oil. This reflux, plus any mechanical carryover, is permitted to drain from the bottom of the deodorizer shell. The ability to accommodate frequent stock changes with a minimum of lost production and practically no intermixing is an important advantage for the semicontinuous systems over the continuous deodorization systems; however, heat recovery is less efficient than a continuous operation, and 10 to 20% more sparge steam is required.110 2.17.2.3 Continuous Deodorization Continuous deodorizers provide uniform utility consumption by not being subject to the peak loads attendant with batch-type heating and cooling of semicontinuous operations. This permits smaller heating and cooling auxiliaries and optimum heat recovery through interchange between incoming and outgoing oils. Processors requiring infrequent product changes can benefit from continuous deodorization; however, processors requiring multiple stock changes will not realize the benefits. Continuous deodorization benefits are lost with as few as three or four stock changes in a 24-hour period due to loss of production (30 to 60 minutes for each stock change) and the likelihood of commingling product. Continuous deodorization can involve tray or thin-film deodorizers. Tray deodorizers are based on a series of steam-agitated trays or compartments often stacked vertically in a cylindrical shell. Stripping of FFA and other volatile compounds and heat bleaching are carried out simultaneously. The retention time per tray is usually 10 to 30 minutes. Typically, liquid levels of 0.3 to 0.8 meters are maintained by overflow pipes or weirs. The trays are drained by separate discharge valves. Physical refining, or the removal of fatty acids from oils by steam distillation rather than by caustic refining, can be carried out in semicontinuous or continuous deodorizers; however, continuous deodorizers containing packed columns are particularly suited to the removal of large amounts of FFA. Thin-film deodorization has structured packing to create a maximum surface-to-volume ratio. The oil flows over the packing and meets the sparging steam counter-currently for FFA stripping. Heat bleaching is accomplished in a retention section after the packed column. The counter-current principle introduces efficiencies through more effective use of the injected steam to reduce the quantity required and smaller vacuum requirements due to the small volume of oil treated at a time. Also, a large percentage of the heat is recovered by preheating the feedstock oil by passing it counter-currently through a heat exchanger opposite the other oil flow.115 The retention time at high temperatures is reduced to a minimum to retain a high level of tocopherols and limit trans fatty acid development.114 Due to the high oil–metal contact surface in packed columns, the risk of fouling is higher. The frequency of cleaning as well as efficiency of the structured packing material is determined by the type of oil processed, the frequency
Fats and Oils Processing
159
of shutdowns, feedstock changes, and the purity of the feedstock. Packed columns processing physically refined oils require more frequent cleaning, each 6 to 10 months, and replacement of the structured packing every 2 to 3 years. Deodorization of chemically refined oils with this system extends the cleaning frequency to once a year and the structured packing lifetime to three to four years.113 2.17.3 Deodorizer Heating Systems Practical, as well as theoretical, considerations indicate that oils should be heated in the range of 410 to 500°F (210 to 260°C) for reasonably rapid and effective deodorization. The Wesson system utilized a direct heat method that circulated the oil through a direct-fired tubular heater. The disadvantages for this system were poor temperature control and localized overheating, which caused hot spots. A more satisfactory system, known as the Merrill system, was used for many years. It heated mineral oil in a direct-fired furnace and circulated it through coils in the deodorization vessel. Pump maintenance, care of the tubes in the direct-fired furnace, and a tendency of the mineral oil to decompose under the heating system conditions were the major shortcomings of this system. Electrical heating has been used to heat deodorizers either by strip heaters immersed in the oil or by placing the elements around the outside of the tank and heating tubes. Automatic control was achieved with electrical heating, but the danger of localized overheating as well as high power costs were problems. The use of condensing thermal heating fluids became the most popular method of heating edible oils shortly after introduction in 1932. All thermal-heating fluids (THFs) became suspect carcinogenic materials as a result of several contamination incidents involving THFs containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). As a result, the use of PCB-containing THFs that could contaminate foods was banned worldwide. THFs with different chemical compositions and low toxicity were adopted in the United States and other countries. Dowtherm A® is the trade name of The Dow Chemical Company for a eutectic mixture of 26.5% diphenyl and 73.5% diphenyl oxide; toxicity and safety data show a negligible health risk for these compounds. This liquid boils with negligible fractionation at 495.8°F (257.7°C) under atmospheric pressure. Dowtherm A is referred to as a liquid because it is used in liquid form, although it is a solid below 53.6°F (12°C). It is relatively stable and has the advantage of low vapor pressure when boiling at high temperature, for example, at 522°F (272°C), the vapor pressure of Dowtherm A is less than 2 bar. Dowtherm A has a pungent odor that is immediately evident in case of a leak. A typical THF heating system consists of a boiler (vaporizer), a burner complete with safety controls required by insurance regulations, and a gravity return system for the condensate from the deodorizer. The European edible-oil community elected to phase-out THF systems and replace them with hot water/steam heat transfer systems. Conversions to these systems have become the trend in the edible oil industry worldwide for a variety of reasons, including improved heat transfer efficiency, reduced energy costs, reduced maintenance, and reduction in perceived safety risks.116
160
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
2.17.4 Deodorization Process Control Deodorization is the last major processing step where flavor, odor, and many of the stability qualities of an edible fats and oils product can be affected. From this point forward, all of the efforts are directed toward retaining the quality of the freshly deodorized product. In order to produce a quality deodorized product, attention must be focused on all the factors involved with the process. The various factors that influence the quality of the finished deodorized oil include:
1. Undeodorized oil preparation: Preparation of the oil before deodorization has a significant effect on the finished deodorized product, therefore, the first process control requirement is to ensure that the processing steps prior to deodorization have been performed properly as specified. For example, deodorization of highperoxide oils will thermally decompose the peroxides, but the rate of peroxide formation in the oil during subsequent storage will probably increase and the flavor stability will be compromised. Proper handling of the oil would be to rebleach it prior to deodorization. Steam distillation does not remove secondary oxidation products, soap, or phosphatides, which are adsorbed in bleaching. 2. Air elimination: Oil must be scrupulously protected from contact with air throughout the deodorization process. At elevated temperatures, oils react instantly with oxygen to form polymeric and oxidized triglycerides, which may be detrimental to health. Some potential air sources are a. Deaeration of the feedstock is essential because the oil may contain dissolved oxygen from previous exposure to the atmosphere. Proper deaeration is achieved by sparging the oil into a tank under reduced pressure. Usually, the oil is heated to >175°F (80°C) and sprayed into a tank kept at a pressure of <50 mbar.113 b. Air leaks can occur at deodorizer fittings below the oil level and in external pumps, heaters, and coolers; allow the oil to oxidize and polymerize. c. The stripping steam must be generated from deaerated water to be oxygen free. 3. Deodorization construction materials: Heavy metals, particularly those possessing two or more valency states, generally increase the rate of oxidation. Of all metal, copper is the most potent catalyst. A concentration high enough to produce a noticeable oxidative effect lies in the proximity of analytical detection limits, probably 0.005 ppm. The corresponding content for iron is 0.03 ppm. Other metals have exhibited varying catalytic powers. For example, the contents of metal ions required to decrease the lard-keeping time by 50% at 208°F (98°C) are 0.06 ppm manganese, 1.2 ppm chromium, 2.2 ppm nickel, 3.0 ppm vanadium, 19.6 ppm zinc, and 50.0 ppm aluminum.117 This comparison stresses the importance of avoiding the use of copper, iron, or some other alloy if the highest possible flavor stability is required; therefore, deodorizers are fabricated from type 304 stainless steel at points contacted by the oil. 4. Metal chelating: Fats and oils obtain metal contents from the soils where plants are grown and later from contact during crushing, processing, and storage. Many of the metals promote autoxidation, which results in off-flavors and odors accompanied by color development in the finished fat and oil products. Studies have identified copper as the most harmful metal, followed by iron, manganese, chromium, and nickel. The effects of pro-oxidants can be diminished by using chelating agents before and after deodorization. The most commonly used chelating agents are citric
Fats and Oils Processing
161
acid, phosphoric acid, and lecithin. Citric acid is metered into the oil as an aqueous or alcoholic solution at levels of 50 to 100 ppm. Citric acid decomposes at 347°F (175°C), and the usual practice is to add it during the cooling stage in deodorization. Citric acid added prior to deodorization decomposes at deodorization temperatures, but still affords a degree of protection from trace quantities of oxygen present during preheating. Phosphoric acid, when used, is added to the deodorizer in an aqueous solution at a concentration of no more than 10 ppm because a slight over-addition can lead to off-flavors in some oils (e.g., watermelon flavor in soybean oil). Lecithin has been used to chelate metals at 5 ppm. 5. Oil polishing: The final stage of deodorization should be filtration of the oil. The deodorized oil is normally pumped through an enclosed polishing filter to remove any fine particles of soaps, metallic salts, rust, filter aid, polymerized oil, or any other solid impurities. Horizontal plate filters have long been used as the polishing filter of choice for deodorized oils. These filters are well adapted to this service because oil clarity is excellent and the amount of solids to be removed from the oil is minimal. The disadvantages of this type of filter are the labor requirements to clean and redress the filter plus the space requirements, thus small cartridge or bag filters have become popular for this purpose. These oil-polishing filters are relatively inexpensive, require a minimum space, and are much less labor intensive; also, the bags are relatively inexpensive. 6. Operating conditions: Operating variables, such as temperature, pressure, stripping steam rate, and time of steaming affect the quality of the finished product. The temperature of the steam required is proportional to the absolute pressure. The time required for efficient deodorization depends on the rate at which steam can be passed through the oil and is limited by the point at which appreciable mechanical entrainment occurs. The lower the system pressure at a fixed vapor pressure or temperature and sparge steam rate, the greater the FFA reduction. Because the vapor pressure of the FFA and the other volatiles is directly proportional to the temperature, an increase in both temperature and sparge steam rate will increase FFA reduction; however, the maximum temperature that can be used is limited because of the detrimental effects upon oil stability and trans acids development.
Typical deodorizer conditions practiced in the United States are shown in Table 2.8 for the three types of deodorization systems.110 Most deodorized oil specifications allow a 0.05% maximum FFA; however, most processors will deodorize to a 0.03% maximum limit internally. The higher published limits allow for the addition of antioxidants or other additives that raise the FFA level. 2.17.5 Deodorizer Distillated Typically, deodorizers utilize a three- or four-stage steam ejector system with direct-contact intercondensers to maintain a vacuum within the deodorization vessel at 1 to 6 mbar absolute pressure, and stripping steam is injected into the oil at a temperature of 410 to 500°F (210 to 260°C). The odoriferous compounds, free fatty acids, mono- and diglycerides, oxidation byproducts, tocopherols, sterols, pesticides, other organic materials, and small quantities of triglycerides are carried off by the stripping steam through the primary steam ejector of the vacuum-generating system
162
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 2.8 Typical Deodorization Conditions Deodorization Conditions Vacuum, absolute pressure, mbar
Range 2 to 4
Deodorization temperature, °F
410 to 500
Deodorization temperature, °C
210 to 260
Holding time at deodorization temperature: Batch deodorizers, hours
3 to 8
Semicontinuous deodorizers, minutes
15 to 120
Continuous deodorizers, minutes
15 to 120
Stripping steam, wt % of oil Batch deodorizers
3.0 to 8.0
Semicontinuous deodorizers
1.0 to 2.0
Continuous deodorizers
0.5 to 2.0
Drop temperature Liquid oils: °F
100 to 130
°C
37.8 to 54.4
Higher melting products °F above melting point
10 to 15
°C above melting point
5.5 to 8.5
Product free fatty acid, % Feedstock Caustic refined
0.05 to 0.1
Physically refined
1.0 to 5.0
Deodorized product
0.02 to 0.03
Product peroxide value, meq/kg Feedstock
2.0 max
Deodorized product
zero
Product flavor, minimum
bland
and are finally condensed along with the stripping and motive steam within the barometric condenser. Scrub coolers are often installed before the barometric condenser to remove as much of the distillate as possible to keep it out of the recirculating cooling water. The distillate stripped from edible oils can be divided into three component groups. The first group will condense between the deodorization and their solidification temperatures, the second group includes those that are condensed and solidify when cooled to a lower temperature by contact with the vacuum system condensing water, and the final group consists of those that remain volatile even at the lower temperature.118 Initially, deodorizers used once-through cooling water systems that discharged the wastewater into rivers, lakes, reservoirs, or to a water treatment plant. Closedcircuit water systems were introduced when the discharge of organic materials
Fats and Oils Processing
163
was restricted by government agencies. These systems recirculated the same water through cooling towers and back to the condensers. A rapid build-up on all the surfaces contacted, such as piping, pumps, values, cooling tower surfaces, spray nozzles, etc., fouled or plugged the equipment, which led to high maintenance costs and created an offensive odor that drew complaints from the surrounding communities. A direct contact cooling process was developed in the late 1950s in which the deodorizer discharge vapor and vacuum booster steam flowed into a tower where they were cooled by direct contact with a stream of circulating distillate. The purpose of the distillate recovery tower was to cool the deodorizer discharge to condense as much of the distillate as possible. The location of the scrub cooler within the vacuum system and the operating conditions were selected to maximize distillate recovery, maintain a pumpable liquid in the tower, and prevent condensing of the vacuum system steam. The distillate recovery systems were very successful in reducing maintenance and odor problems; however, some organic material still escaped and ended up in the hot well, which contributed to cooling tower problems. This problem was solved with condenser-water recycling systems. The basic concept of these systems was to keep the cooling tower clean by cooling the dirty, hot well water in a heat exchanger with tower water before recycling to the vacuum system barometric condensers. In this system, there is no direct contact between the two water streams, so the cooling tower water remains clear.111 The odoriferous low-boiling compounds that remain volatile at low temperatures continue in the vapor phase through the barometric condenser and exit with the final vacuum stage discharge. The volatile compounds dissolve in the hot well water and are either reintroduced into the air in the cooling tower or build up in the hot well to cause odor emissions around the deodorizer. Three techniques that have been used for odor control of the noncondensable materials are wet scrubbers, carbon bed systems, and thermal incineration. Carbon beds have not been successful with edible oil systems because of the heat load in the steam being discharged from the deodorizer vacuum system and the regeneration problems encountered with the carbon bed. Thermal incineration has not been adopted for deodorization odor control because of the low cost and availability of energy. Wet scrubbers offer the best solution for eliminating noncondensable odor compounds. A wet scrubber is a device where a liquid is brought into contact with the gas to absorb the soluble components or capture any solid particles. Wet scrubbers normally consist of two components: the first section is a contacting zone where the vapor or particle is captured, and the second section is a disengaging zone where the liquid is eliminated from the cleaned gas.118 Deodorizer distillate is the material collected from the steam distillation of edible oils. As a general rule, 0.5% of the deodorizer feedstock would approximate the amount of distillate produced by a typical processor of edible fats and oils. The composition of the distillate depends on the source oil, the refining technique utilized, and the deodorizer operating conditions. The distillate from physically refined oils consists mainly of FFA with low levels of unsaponifiable components. Distillates from chemically refined oils have higher economic value due to higher sterol and tocopherol contents that are sources for natural vitamin E, natural antioxidants, and other pharmaceuticals.113 The use of deodorizer distillates in animal feeds is
164
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
forbidden by U.S. regulations because any insecticides in the source oils are codistilled with the other organic compounds. The distillate can be used as a source of industrial fatty acids or mixed with the fuel oil used to fire the steam boilers. Up to 10% of the distillate has been successfully used in fuel oil. The remaining disposal alternatives are depositing it in a refuse dump, if permitted, or combustion in a fluidized bed incinerator.119,120 2.18 FINISHED FATS AND OILS HANDLING The last major process that can control the odor and flavor stability of an edible fats and oils product is deodorization. If the conditions of the preceding processing technique and raw material quality have been satisfactory, the result is a tasteless, odorless, and light-colored fat and oil ingredient, free from peroxides and contaminants. Processes for handling and storage of these products must protect the achieved quality prior to packaging or use in a prepared food product. Deodorized fats and oils products must be protected from contamination with foreign flavors, foreign odors, impurities, other fats and oils products, and hydrolysis, as well as thermal decomposition and oxidative deterioration. 2.18.1 Protection against Oxidative Deterioration Fats and oils containing unsaturated fatty acids are subject to oxidation, a chemical reaction that can occur with exposure to air to make their flavor unacceptable to consumers. The double bonds found in unsaturated fatty acids are the site of this chemical activity. The oxidation rate is roughly proportional to the degree of unsaturation — linolenic (C-18:3), with three double bonds, is more susceptible than oleic (C-18:1), with only one. Linoleic (C-18:2) is intermediate but twice as susceptible as oleic. Oxidative deterioration results in the formation of hydroperoxides, which decompose into carbonyls, dimerization, and polymerized materials. It is accelerated by temperature increase, oxygen pressure increase, a higher concentration of oxidation products (peroxides and aldehydes), metal catalyst, lipoxdases, hematin compounds, antioxidant reductions, absence of metal deactivators, storage time, and ultraviolet or visible light.117 Extensive oxidation would eventually destroy the carotenoids (vitamin A), the essential fatty acids (linoleic and linolenic), and the tocopherols (vitamin E) contained in most oils. Prevention of oxidation is a major factor that must be designed into all edible fats and oils storage, handling, and processes. 2.18.1.1 Nitrogen Blanketing Many of the current edible fats and oils storage, handling, and stabilization practices stem from the results of flavor stability research. Determinations that a correlation exists between peroxide value results and flavor determinations indicate that flavor deterioration can be prevented by excluding air from fats and oils
Fats and Oils Processing
165
products. The usual procedure involves replacing oxygen with nitrogen. Gas-free finished oil is delivered from the deodorizer to a storage tank under a complete nitrogen blanket supplied by a nitrogen gas generation unit or from liquid nitrogen. A nitrogen blanket is maintained by a pressure system controlled by a regulator. As the tank is filled with oil, the pressure builds and the gas is vented to the atmosphere. Conversely, as the oil is pumped from the tank, the pressure drops and replacement gas enters the tank. It is good practice to install a relief valve or rupture disk for each tank to avoid collapsing a tank with a vacuum. A typical system would be kept under nitrogen pressure of 1 to 15 psi (1 to 2 kg/cm2). This pressure varies as the tanks are loaded or unloaded, and the pressure relief valves are set to relieve pressures above 15 psi (2 kg/cm2). Another nitrogen protective practice utilized is to sparge oils at the exit of the deodorizer or a nitrogen-blanketed vessel. The principle is to saturate the oil with nitrogen while it is completely deaerated. The spargers discharge tiny bubbles of nitrogen directly into the oil stream. As the oil flows into the unprotected vessel, the effusing gas sweeps the headspace, sweeping most of the oxygen from the vessel. This technique is particularly useful for protecting bulk oil shipments in tank cars and trucks.121 Oxygen contact can be reduced by keeping the entire edible fats and oils handling process protected with an inert gas. In finished oil processing, preferably the product is protected by nitrogen gas in the storage tanks and bulk transports as well as in the packaging. Effective protection against oxidation for packaged products requires that the air in the oil and the package headspace be evacuated and then replaced by a protective gas, such as nitrogen. 2.18.1.2 Temperature Control Fats and oils temperatures should be maintained as low as possible during handling because heat accelerates the oxidation reaction. Before exiting the deodorizer, while still protected by vacuum, the product should be cooled to 100 to 130°F (37.8 to 54.4°C) for liquid oils and 10 to 15°F (5.5 to 8.5°C) above the melting point of higher melting products. After the polish filter, the liquid oils can be further cooled. The speed of oxidation is doubled for each 27°F (15°C) temperature increase in the 68 to 140°F (20 to 60°C) range. This means that an oil can be held four times as long at 68°F than at 122°F, before the same degree of oxidation occurs. Hydrogenated and higher melting fats and oils must be kept liquid for transfer with pumps. It is necessary to control the product handling temperature to prevent oxidation and because the pumping rates and volumetric metering systems are dependent on product viscosity, which is temperature dependent. A good practice, as outlined above, is to keep the products no warmer than necessary to pump conveniently or 10 to 15°F (5.5 to 8.5°C) above the melting point of the product. Bulk handling systems should be designed to accommodate low-temperature product handling and minimize localized overheating with short insulated lines, tank agitators, automatic temperature controllers, hot-water or low-pressure steam heating, properly sized tanks, proper placement of temperature probes, and so on.
166
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
2.18.1.3 Light Control Light exposure contributes to the flavor deterioration of all edible fat and oil products. Even limited exposure of an oil product to sunlight or ultraviolet rays from fluorescent lighting will increase peroxide value results and decrease flavor ratings. Normally, light-induced deterioration is not a processing concern because all processing, handling, and storage are accomplished in closed systems; however, two areas of concern are (1) the samples drawn and submitted to the laboratory for analysis, and (2) the liquid oils packaged in clear bottles for the retail market. Transparent or open large-mouth containers should not be used to obtain samples for laboratory testing of organoleptical properties and peroxide value determinations. Oils stored in brown glass bottles have experienced only slightly more deterioration than those stored in metal or otherwise kept away from light, but the U.S. consumer has shown a preference for salad oils packaged in clear containers. 2.18.1.4 Storage Time All fat or oil products experience deterioration even when handled and stored under ideal conditions. Oils that do not require heating to remain liquid resist deterioration more so than the higher melting products. The higher melting products should not be allowed to solidify and then be reheated for use unless for a downtime of extended duration. Most shortenings and other similar products will maintain an acceptable flavor and oxidative stability for two to three weeks in melted form with adequate controls. Therefore, edible fats and oils storage systems should be designed for turnovers of less than two to three weeks or within the established storage life of the product. Additionally, fresh product should not be added to heels of previous lots. The older product will contain concentrations of oxidation products that will accelerate oxidation of the fresh product. 2.18.1.5 Antioxidant Addition Antioxidants are chemical compounds that provide greater oxidative stability and longer shelf life for edible fats and oils by delaying the onset of oxidative rancidity. Oxidation occurs in a series of steps often referred to as free radical oxidation because the initial step is the formation of a free radical on the fatty acid portion of the fat molecule. The free radical is highly reactive and forms peroxides and hydroperoxides by reaction with oxygen. These free radicals also initiate further oxidation by propagating other free radicals. Finally, the hydroperoxides split into smaller organic compounds, such as aldehydes, ketones, alcohols, and acids. These compounds provide the offensive odor and flavor characteristic of oxidized oils.122 Antioxidants function by inhibiting or interrupting the free-radical mechanism of glyceride autoxidation. Their ability to do this is based on their phenolic structure or the phenolic configuration within their molecular structure. Antioxidants or phenolic substances function as a free-radical acceptor, thereby terminating oxidation at the
Fats and Oils Processing
167
initial step. Fortunately, the antioxidant free radical that forms is stable and does not split into other compounds that provide off-flavors and odors nor does it propagate further oxidation of the glyceride.123 Food products in interstate commerce in the United States are subject to the regulations under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; the Meat Inspection Act; and the Poultry Inspection Act. These regulations establish limitations on the use of antioxidants and other food additives in food products. Antioxidants cleared under these regulations include the following:122-129 • Tocopherols and tocotrienols: Nature’s fat-soluble antioxidants exist in four homologs: alpha, beta, gamma, and delta. The α-isomer (vitamin E) is widely used as a nutritional supplement. The β-isomers exist in concentrations too low to have any practical significance. Both the γ-isomer and the δ-isomer are known primarily for their antioxidant properties and are used where consumers require a natural antioxidant. Interestingly, synthetic antioxidants contain the same phenolic structure that makes the tocopherols effective antioxidants. In most applications, tocopherol addition levels of 0.02 to 0.06% are sufficient to provide good antioxidant properties. The USDA limits the addition level to 0.03% for lard or rendered pork and rendered poultry fat, but the FDA allows the amount required for the intended technical effect for most products. The antioxidant properties of tocopherols can be enhanced by the addition of an acid synergist, such as citric or ascorbic acid. Tocopherol additions have the most application for stabilizing edible fats of animal origin because of the absence of natural antioxidants in these products. Vegetable oils are the source of the tocopherols, and enough of the natural antioxidant survives refining, bleaching, and deodorization to provide the optimum stability available from tocopherols. A survival level of 500 ppm for soybean oil is considered adequate to protect the oil from oxidation. Performance testing has shown that tocopherol levels above the normal survival level do not improve the oxidative stability, but, in fact, act as a prooxidant to enhance oxidation. • Propyl gallate (PG): Propyl gallate, or n-propyl ester of 3,4,5-tri-hydroxybenzoic acid, is an effective antioxidant for shelf-life improvement of vegetable oils at usage levels of 100 to 200 ppm, or the FDA and USDA permitted levels; however, its usage is hampered by solubility problems, discoloration, and poor heat stability. Propyl gallate has significant water solubility and seeks the water phase in water– fat systems that causes a reduction in antioxidant effectiveness and allows complexing with iron to cause iron-gallate discoloration. Darkening of scrambled eggs to a blue-black color when prepared in an iron skillet with an oil stabilized with propyl gallate is an example of the deficiency. Additionally, edible oil products stabilized with propyl gallate can darken while stored in black iron vessels, when packaged in metal containers, or when coming into contact with metal processing equipment. Finally, propyl gallate may be inactivated readily in alkaline systems and particularly at elevated temperatures. These deficiencies have limited the use of propyl gallate in edible fats and oils in the United States, where tertiary butylhydroquinone (TBHG) has been approved as an alternative effective vegetable oil antioxidant. • Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA): BHA is outstanding among the antioxidants for its carry-through effect, that is, it can substantially withstand food-processing temperatures such as those experienced in baking and frying. BHA is inactivated by 70% at 150°C (302°F).130 BHA is referred to as a hindered phenol because of
168
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
the tertiaybutyl group ortho or meta to the hydroxyl group. This steric hindrance is probably responsible for the ineffectiveness of BHA in vegetable oils; however, this same steric hindrance is probably responsible for the carry-through effect for baked or fried foods. BHA has a strong phenolic odor that is particularly noticeable with the initial heating of frying shortenings or oils stabilized with BHA and can be described as a chemical odor. Another concern is the development of a pink color, which can occur when BHA comes into contact with fairly high concentrations of alkaline metal ions, such as sodium or potassium. • Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT): BHT is another hindered phenol with a molecular structure similar to BHA. BHT is also similar to BHA in performance with regard to its relatively weak stabilization of vegetable oils and ability to survive baking and frying conditions to carry through into the finished food products. BHT has been found effective as an antioxidant at temperatures up to 175°C (347°F) exhibiting only 25 to 30% inactivation.130 Both BHT and BHA are extremely soluble in edible fats and oils and have practically no water solubility. BHT can experience some darkening in the presence of iron, but the degree is not very serious. • Tertiary Butylhydroquinone (TBHQ): TBHQ is a relatively recent addition to the approved antioxidant list in the United States and has not gained approval in many other countries. TBHQ has been found to be the most effective antioxidant for unsaturated vegetable oils, and it has several other advantages: (1) no discoloration when used in the presence of iron, (2) no discernible odor or flavor imparted to fats and oils, (3) good solubility in fats and oils, (4) effectiveness in poultry and animal fats as well as vegetable oils, (5) carry-through protection in baked and fried products (it is effective as an antioxidant at temperatures up to 175°C (347°F)),130 and (6) stabilizing effect upon tocopherols. The use of TBHQ to protect edible fats and oils from crude to deodorized has been found effective for preventing secondary oxidation products as determined by anisidine value evaluations. This protection is completely removed during steam distillation, and additional TBHQ must be added to the deodorized products for protection of the finished oils. TBHQ, BHA, and BHT are all volatilized at approximately the same rate, but oils stabilized with TBHQ antioxidant consistently have a higher oxidative stability and a better carrythrough into fried foods. One concern with TBHQ utilization is the pink color that can develop with an alkaline pH, certain proteins, or sodium salts.
2.18.1.6 Synergistic Antioxidant Mixtures Much of the success of antioxidants depends on their being in chemical contact with the product they are protecting, thus antioxidant formulations containing various combinations of different antioxidant and chelating agents are generally used in most food applications, rather than individual antioxidant compounds. Not only does the use of such formulations provide a convenience, in that it is easier to handle the diluted antioxidants, but it also permits the processor to take advantage of the synergistic properties of the different antioxidant compounds. For example, BHA and BHT used in combination provide a greater antioxidant effect than when either is used alone. Propylene glycol and vegetable oils usually serve as solvents for the antioxidant mixtures. Lecithin, citrate, monoglyceride citrate, and mono- and diglycerides are included in the formulations as emulsifiers.
Fats and Oils Processing
169
Synergism is a characteristic common to many antioxidant mixtures. A mixture is designated as synergistic when the effect of the mixture is greater than the effect produced by the sum of the individual components. A synergist, such as citric acid, has two important functions in antioxidant formulations: (1) it increases the antioxidant effectiveness of the combination; and (2) it ties up or sequesters the trace metals, which are fat-oxidizing catalysts, by forming complex, stable compounds (chelates). Other compounds that function as synergists and chelating agents include isopropyl citrate, stearyl citrate, orthophosphoric acid, sodium monohydrogen phosphate, pyrophosphoric acid and its salts, metaphosphoric acid and its salts, calcium disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and disodium EDTA. 2.18.2 Protection against Contamination A contaminant is any undesirable material that may taint, infect, corrupt, modify, or degrade by contact or association. Edible fats and oils must be protected from contamination at all stages of processing and especially after deodorization because that is the last opportunity to remove undesirable flavors, odors, colors, and other compounds. The contaminants most likely to affect the deodorized edible fat and oil products to the degree that would require reprocessing or downgrading to a lesser value product include: • Moisture: Maintenance of a low-moisture content after deodorization will ensure that hydrolysis does not occur. Hydrolysis is the reaction of water with a fat or triglyceride to break it down into a diglyceride and a free fatty acid. This hydrolytic reaction of fats and oils can be prevented by maintaining a moisture-free environment for the product. Some potential sources of moisture contamination during storage and handling are ruptured heating or cooling coils, leaking coolers, inadequate drying of washed tanks, condensation, steaming of lines, etc. • Impurities: Foreign material in a finished product is usually caused by a malfunctioning polish filter, precipitant of metal salts, polymerized oil from dead spaces in lines, inadequate tank cleaning, etc. It is a good policy to polish filter all finished products during each transfer, preferably as near to the destination as possible. • Commingling: Inadvertent mixing of two different fats and oils products together is serious contamination. Every finished fats and oils product has specific properties designed for the intended application. Commingling with another product can change the composition, consistency, performance, and oxidative stability of the contaminated product. The resultant product in most cases requires reprocessing to another product due to potential changes in labeling, religious constraints, and performance. Commingling is usually the result of human error or malfunction of a valve. Murphy’s Law dictates that the highest value product is always mixed with the least-expensive product handled. • Odors and flavors: Fats and oils easily absorb odors and flavors from other foods, spices, solvents, gases, chemicals, paints, and any other odoriferous or flavorful material. Extreme care must be exercised to protect the fat and oil products at all times after deodorization including storage, handling, and transportation of bulk liquid or packaged products.
170
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
2.19 PLASTICIZATION Considerably more is involved in preparing a shortening and margarine for packaging and eventual use as an ingredient or spread than simply lowering the temperature to cause solidification. For example, a grainy, pasty, nonuniform mass is produced when edible fats and oils are allowed to cool slowly. The more saturated triglycerides crystallize first and grow in size to produce an unsightly, difficult to handle, mushy product that lacks many of the basic qualities necessary for shortening or margarine performance. Development of the desired edibility, appearance, stability, texture, functionality, uniformity, and reproducibility in solidified fat and oil products is a function of controlled crystallization or plasticization. 2.19.1 Plasticity of Edible Fats and Oils Edible fat and oil products appear to be soft homogenous solids; however, microscopic examination shows a mass of very small interlocked crystals that trap and hold by surface tension a high percentage of liquid oil. The crystals are separate discrete particles capable of moving independently of each other when a sufficient shearing force is applied to the mass. Therefore, shortening, margarine, and other solidified fat and oil products possess the characteristic structure of a plastic solid. The distinguishing feature of a plastic substance is the property of behaving as a solid by completely resisting small stresses, but yielding at once and flowing like a liquid when subjected to deforming stresses above a minimal value. A firm, plastic material will not flow or deform from its own weight; however, it may be easily molded by slight pressure into any desired form. Plastic solids derive their functionality from their unique plastic nature. Three conditions are essential for plasticity:131
1. It must consist of two phases, one a solid and the other a liquid. 2. The solid phase must be dispersed finely enough to hold the mass together by internal cohesive forces. 3. The two phases must be in proper proportions. The solid portion must be capable of holding the liquid while enough liquid must be available to allow flow when stress is applied.
Plasticity and consistency of an edible fats and oils product depend on the amount, size, shape, and distribution of the solid material, as well as the development of crystal nuclei capable of surviving high-temperature abuse to serve as starting points for new desirable crystal growth. The factors that influence these characteristics are discussed below.132,133 2.19.1.1 Product Composition The element most directly influencing the consistency of a plastic shortening is the amount of material in the solid phase; the product becomes firmer as the solids contents increase. The solids contents are determined by oil source and prior
Fats and Oils Processing
171
processing, including the degree of hydrogenation, interesterification, fractionation, or naturally solid source oils, such as lard, tallow, palm oil, or coconut oil. Solidified fats and oils begin to have enough body to hold their shape well at a solids content as low as 5% and become rigid, losing elasticity as the solids contents reach 40 to 50%. A typical all-purpose bakery shortening, formulated for creaming properties and spreadability or workability, attempts to maintain a solids fat index of 15 to 25% over the widest temperature range possible; however, each product has a satisfactory plastic range, which is the temperature range in which the particular fats and oils product may be used with the intended results. 2.19.1.2 Crystal Size At elevated temperatures, fats retain enough molecular motion to preclude organization into stable crystal structures; however, edible fats and oils go through a series of increasingly organized crystal phases with cooling until a final stable crystal form is achieved. All fats crystallize from the liquid phase in the α form and transform more or less rapidly to β′ and, subsequently, to the intermediate or the β modifications if they are likely to exhibit these higher polymorphs. This sequence is irreversible. Once transformation to the more stable forms has occurred, lower polymorphs can be obtained only by melting the product and repeating the process. This process can occur in fractions of a second or in months. The crystal types formed define the texture and functional properties of most fat-based products. Each crystal form possesses its own specific physical properties; they differ in melting point, solubility, specific heat, and dielectric constants, for example. The crystal lattice formed when the molecules solidify is a relatively loose arrangement. As crystallization proceeds, the molecules tend to pack more closely together. With time, the molecules in the crystal lattice will pack together as closely as their structure permits, therefore, the molecules in the most stable crystal lattice will require the least space. The body and functionality of plastic fat and oil products are influenced significantly by the size of the crystals formed during solidification. A product becomes progressively firmer as the average size of the crystals decreases and becomes softer as the crystal size increases. A fat that has been melted and allowed to crystallize slowly under static conditions will contain many large crystals plainly visible to the eye. Crystals formed in the same fat by rapid chilling methods will be microscopic in size. Quickly chilled product with very small crystals will be firmer and will have a consistency range much wider than that of a fat slowly crystallized. The slowly crystallized product will also be softer than the rapidly chilled fat. 2.19.1.3 Supercooling A very critical and complicating factor in plasticizing of edible fats and oils products is the supercooling properties of triglycerides. Fats can remain liquid when chilled below their melting point. Because of this fact and the fact that fats are polymorphic and can crystallize in two or more forms, the solidification and plasticization process requires careful control. The degree of supercooling and the temperature
172
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
at which the supercooled product is allowed to reach crystal equilibrium is directly related to the temperature range over which the product will be workable. In practice, the temperature to which the product is supercooled, worked, and packaged is controlled to produce the widest plastic range for the individual product formulation. The extent to which a fat is supercooled can affect not only the consistency, but also the melting point of the solidified product. 2.19.1.4 Mechanical Working Solidification of the supercooled product without working or agitation will produce a firm consistency and a narrow plastic range. The product will also lack smoothness of texture and have a nonuniform appearance. Solidification without working allows the fat crystals to grow together to form a crystal lattice with greater strength than the same product with the crystals broken into smaller discrete particles. Thus, for optimum plasticity, the supercooled product must be mechanically worked during this crystal formation period until substantially all of the latent heat of crystallization has been dissipated. The degree of work applied to shortening and margarine differs due to the finished product consistency desired. Traditional table-grade margarine, packaged in quarter-pound sticks and one-pound solids, must be firm enough to be handled with print-forming and wrapping equipment. Shortening and soft-tub margarines should be in a semifluid condition at the filling station. Traditional stick margarines must be allowed to reach crystallization equilibrium with a minimum amount of work for a homogenous mixture. An important precaution for both stick- and tub-type margarine plasticization is to avoid too fine a dispersion of the aqueous phase while inducing the larger crystal formation. This helps prevent a “waxy” mouth sensation and hastens the liberation of the salty aqueous phase, which contributes some of the flavors and complements others. 2.19.1.5 Gas Incorporation Creaming gas, preferably an inert gas such as nitrogen instead of air, is incorporated into most standard shortenings at 13% (± 1%), regular soft-tub margarines at 4 to 8%, whipped-tub margarines at 30 to 35%, and precreamed household shortenings at 18 to 25%. Creaming gas is added to these products to produce: (1) a white, creamy appearance; (2) a bright surface sheen; (3) an easier handling, less dense product; (4) texture improvement; (5) homogeneity; (6) increased volume; (7) reduced calories per serving; and (8) reduced saturated and trans fatty acid grams per serving. Stick, liquid, and most industrial margarines do not have creaming gas added during crystallization. The aqueous phase of a margarine emulsion has the same effect on appearance as gas incorporation. 2.19.2 Solidification Apparatus Evolutions Most of the first vegetable oil shortenings were grainy and nonuniform with an appearance similar to rendered lard. These products either were filled into containers
Fats and Oils Processing
173
in a molten state and allowed to cool and solidify or were chilled in tanks until crystallization began and then poured into containers where crystallization and solidification were completed. With this type of processing, the rate and degree of chilling that affected the degree of crystallization before packaging were variable and resulted in products with a nonuniform texture and consistency.51,134-136 Probably the earliest device in general use for achieving rapid cooling of fat and oil products was the chill roll, which was a hollow cast-iron, closed-end cylinder, mounted on bearings so it could revolve. The roll was chilled either by pumping brine through it or by direct expansion of ammonia into its interior. In operation, the roll was rotated, and during rotation it passed through or contacted a trough containing molten fat. A film of fat adhered to the roll surface, where it was chilled to form a solid layer. The solidified sheet of fat was scraped off the roll surface by a doctor blade just prior to the melted fat pickup point after one revolution. The solidified fat dropped from the roll into a horizontal trough or picker box with a longitudinal shaft fitted with a number of paddles or spikes. The purpose of the picker box was threefold: (1) to beat air into the product, which improved the product appearance and texture; (2) to serve as a holding vessel while crystallization continued; and (3) to dissipate the heat of crystallization. Although the fat sheet from the roll was usually solid, it was in a supercooled condition, and much of the crystallization remained to take place after it left the roll surface. From the picker box, the viscous fat was pumped under pressure through a throttling valve to the container. The pressure and throttling improved the texture and appearance of the shortening by uniformly distributing the air bubbles within the fat and by breaking up any large agglomerates of crystals. Use of the chill roll allowed packaging of a reasonably uniform product. By varying the speed of the roll and the temperature of the refrigerant, it was possible to control the rate of chilling and the degree to which the fat was cooled. In the early 1930s, work aimed at the development of improved heat-transfer equipment for freezing ice cream led to the perfection of a continuous internal chilling machine that was soon applied to the plasticization of shortenings. Liquid fat to be chilled is pumped into a relatively small annular space between a large mutator shaft and an outer refrigerated jacket. As the shortening contacts the cold jacket wall, it congeals and is instantly scraped off by scraper blades attached to the rapidly rotating mutator. This repeated high-speed congealing/scraping sequence provides extremely high heat transfer rates and a homogeneous product. The mutator may be hollow and heated slightly with circulating warm water to prevent the formation of adhering masses of crystallized fat. As the molten shortening is pumped to the scraped-wall heat exchanger, nitrogen, an inert gas, is injected into the stream where it dissolves in the liquid fat under normal pump pressures. As the product leaves the heat exchanger, it flows into a working or tempering unit that simulates, to some extent, the picker box with the chill-roll procedure. The worker unit is a closed cylinder with stationary pins attached to the walls that intermesh with spirally located pins affixed to a helical rotating shaft inside the unit. The purpose of the worker unit is to dissipate the heat of crystallization while working the shortening to develop fine crystals. The worked shortening passes through an extrusion or throttling valve to make a homogeneous product and
174
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
is pumped to the filling station, where it again passes through another extrusion valve and into the package. Margarine processing has gone through somewhat the same developments as shortening processing, except that in the beginning it was chilled by continuously pouring or spraying the molten emulsion into a vat of running cold water or brine. The emulsion entered at one end of the vat and solidified before it reached the other end. The solidified material floated to the surface in the form of a flaky mass that was skimmed off. The water was drained from the solidified emulsion before it was worked to give the desired texture and to incorporate flavoring ingredients. This procedure gave way to chill-roll processing, which was replaced with the scraped-wall heat exchanger process in the United States. With this processing, it is customary to make an emulsion containing the fat, moisture, salt, flavoring materials, emulsifiers, color, etc., which is then chilled by using the scraped-wall heat exchanger. The other differences compared to shortening plasticization are lower chilling temperatures, creaming gas or nitrogen is not incorporated for most margarines, and utilization of a quiescent aging tube instead of the picking or working unit to provide a firm body suitable for printing into quarters or one-pound solids. Also, margarine handling equipment has to be constructed of corrosion-resistant metals due to the presence of salt, moisture, and acids in the emulsions. As the continuous closed system for plasticizing margarine was developing in the United States, an intermittent method was becoming popular in Europe. Crystallization in this process is accomplished by delivering the emulsion to internally refrigerated rotating drums or rolls. After crystallization, the product is allowed to temper before it is conveyed through a series of working rolls. It is then transferred to a worker or compactor, cut into slabs, and conveyed to blending machines where the moisture is adjusted. After blending, it is placed in large troughs for chilling to 40°F (4.4°C). The chilled product is then printed and packaged. The advocates of the European process maintain that it provides a preferred product consistency and texture because it more closely approximates butter. Margarine crystallization structure with the continuous process preferred in the United States is finer with a tighter emulsion that does not experience moisture weeping, but probably masks flavor more so than the European process. 2.19.3 Shortening Plasticization Process The ultimate polymorphic form of plastic shortening is determined by the triglyceride composition, but the rate at which the most stable form is reached can be influenced by mechanical and thermal energy. Thus, it is customary to process plastic shortenings through various heat-exchanger working configurations to remove heat of crystallization and heat of transformation. A typical U.S. shortening plasticization process, depicted in Figure 2.10, begins when the deodorized shortening blend has been transferred to the packaging department storage vessel, has had all the specified additive materials incorporated, and has met all of the process quality control requirements. The sequence of operations for the plasticization of a shortening are51,132-138
Fats and Oils Processing
175
Shortening Blend Supply Tank Chiller Supply Vessel High Pressure Pump
Precooler
Chilling Unit Scraped Surface Heat Exchanger Worker Unit (Picker)
Inline Filter
Creaming Gas Injection Pressure Regulating Valve Metal Magnets
Extrusion Valve
Pump Extrusion Valve
Remelt Heat Exchanger Shortening Filler Shortening Package Tempering Storage
Figure 2.10 Typical process flow for shortening plasticization.
176
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
l. The deodorized shortening blend is transferred from the packaging department storage tank to a small float-controlled supply tank adjacent to the chilling unit. 2. The product is picked up by a gear pump that maintains pressures of 300 to 400 psi (20 to 26.7 bar) for some systems and up to 1000 psi (66.7 bar) for others, on the entire chilling system. 3. Nitrogen, an inert gas, is introduced into the suction side of the gear pump, usually at 13.0% (± 1.0%) for standard shortenings. Creaming gas levels can range from 0 to 30.0%, depending on the product requirements. 4. Pressure throughout the entire solidification system is maintained by the use of a pressure-regulating valve placed in the product line between the pump and the precooler. 5. The oil and nitrogen mixture is precooled to 10 to 15°F (5.5 to 8.3°C) above the melting point of the product. It is important that the shortening blend remain completely melted to prevent precrystallization before rapid cooling is commenced, as this will result in the formation of large crystals that do not provide a good homogeneous crystal structure. The purpose of the precooler is to: a. Ensure that the shortening blend entering the scraped-wall heat exchange is at a constant temperature. b. Reduce the load on the scraped-wall heat exchanger. c. Ensure the presence of a large number of crystal nuclei in the product as it is chilled in the scraped-wall heat exchanger . 6. The precooled shortening blend enters the scraped-wall heat exchanger where it is rapidly chilled (usually less than a 30-second residence time) to temperatures ranging from 60 to 78°F (15.6 to 25.6°C), depending on the product type and desired firmness. 7. The supercooled product then passes through one or more worker tubes where the fat crystals are subjected to a shearing action while the heat of crystallization dissipates. The shaft in the worker unit revolves at approximately 125 rpm, and the residence time of the chilled product in this unit is usually about 3 minutes. During this time, the temperature of the product rises approximately 10 to 15°F (5.6 to 8.3°C) due to the heat of crystallization. 8. The worked product is then forced through an extrusion valve that contains a slot or other form of constriction to aid in making the product homogeneous by breaking up any remaining crystal aggregates with an intense shearing action. 9. A rotary pump delivers the substantially solidified product at pressures in the range of 20 to 26.7 bar (300 to 400 psi) to a second extrusion valve located near the filling station. 10. The solidified shortening can now be filled. The temperature rise in the container should not be in excess of 1 or 2°F (0.6 to 1.1°C). Increases above this level are indicative of substantial crystallization under static conditions and will cause the consistency to be firmer than desired.
2.19.4 Liquid Shortening Crystallization The major attribute of liquid shortenings is fluidity at room temperature. Liquid shortenings are easily poured, pumped, and metered under normal atmospheric conditions, which reduces handling problems for the consumer. Properly processed liquid shortenings do not require agitation to ensure uniformity. Also, oxidative stability
Fats and Oils Processing
177
is prolonged because no heat is required for fluidity at temperatures as low as 50°F (10°C) for most liquid shortenings. The products are milky white in appearance due to the dispersion of hardfats in the form of microcrystalline particles, which do not settle out because of the crystallization process. Fluid shortenings are composed of components that are stable in the β-crystalline form. Low-iodine-value, β-crystalforming hardfats seed crystallization for liquid shortenings. The hardfat level that can be added is limited by the desired fluidity of the shortening and the eating quality requirements of the finished products. A stable fluid system in the β-crystalline form will not increase in viscosity or gel once it is properly processed. Hardfats with β′-crystal habits are unacceptable for liquid shortenings because the tight-knit crystal lattice structure initiates a viscosity change with crystallization to a nonfluid product. Aeration properties normally associated with β′ small crystals are achieved by the addition of appropriate emulsifiers. Emulsifiers are also included in some formulations to retard staling of yeast-raised breads and rolls to increase shelf life. The rate at which a fat transforms into its stable crystal form is important in liquid shortening processing because it must be in the stable form before packaging to avoid solidification in the package. Therefore, the transformation of a liquid shortening into the stable form must be accomplished in a few hours. The quickest transformation of a fat to its stable crystal form can be attained by the following:
1. Heat the fat until completely melted. 2. Rapidly cool the fat to just below the α-crystal melting point. Theoretically, the α-crystal melting point is very nearly the lower limit to which fatty materials can be cooled without forming any crystals. AOCS Method Cc 6-25 determines the temperature at which a cloud is induced in a fat caused by the first stage of crystallization. 3. Heat to just above the β′-crystal melting point, but below the β-crystal melting point. The β-crystal melting point or the highest melting form can be estimated with a capillary melting point (AOCS Method Cc 1-25).39
Many different processes have been proposed and patented for preparing liquid shortenings. Most of the methods require rapid chilling of the product with a scrapedsurface heat exchanger followed by a crystallization period in an agitated vessel. Two process procedures that have produced acceptable liquid shortenings are diagrammed in Figure 2.11. Process A has been found acceptable for liquid shortenings with hardfat levels below 5%, and process B, which requires more process time, has been found acceptable for products with more than 5% hardfat or emulsifier additions. 2.19.5 Margarine Plasticization Process Several different types of margarine and spreads are produced for the North American retail, foodservice, and food processor markets. Processing parameters, such as formulations, should be tailored to produce the appropriate finished product characteristics. The presence of moisture and salt necessitates the use of sanitary piping and fittings throughout the margarine process, and the material-contacting
178
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Process “A” Low Hardfat Single Chiller
Pressure Regulating Valve
Pressure Regulating Valve
Liquid Shortening Supply Tank
Process “B” High Hardfat Double Chiller
Agitated Supply Tank 145 to 151°F
Agitated Supply Tank 155 to 165°F
Quiescent Deaeration One Hour 145 to 151°F
Quiescent Deaeration One Hour 155 to 165°F
High Pressure Pump
High Pressure Pump
Precooler
Precooler
Scraped Surface Heat Exchanger 25 bar min 60 to 71°F
Scraped Surface Heat Exchanger 17 to 20 bar 98 to 102°F
Worker Unit
Recirculate One Hour Minimum
Crystallization Agitated Vessel One Hour 80 to 90°F
Worker Unit
Pressure Regulating Valve
Extrusion Valve 0.006'' Orifice
Crystallization Agitated Vessel 110 to 115°F Scraped Surface Heat Exchanger 17 to 20 bar 68 to 72°F
Liquid Shortening Filling Warehouse Storage & Shipment
Worker Unit
Bulk Shipment
Crystallization Agitated Vessel 4 to 12 Hours 80 to 90°F
Figure 2.11 Liquid shortening crystallization process flow.
parts of the equipment are stainless steel or commercially chrome-plated, pure nickel. Four basic margarine types produced are stick, soft tub, liquid, and industrial products. The process flows for these margarine types are illustrated in Figure 2.12. Processing for all of the margarine types begins with the preparation of the waterin-oil emulsion. The loose emulsion may be produced with either a batch or a continuous process. With batch processing, the emulsion mixing tank or vat is called a churn, although it has no resemblance to a butter churn. It is fabricated with stainless steel, as is all of the margarine equipment, to resist corrosion. Also, it is jacketed for temperature control and agitated with high-speed, counter-rotating propellers. Emulsions are prepared by weighing or metering warm margarine oil into the churn and individually
Fats and Oils Processing
Margarine Oil Supply Tank
Margarine Oil Soluble Ingredients
Inline Filter
Oil Soluble Ingredient Mixing
Tablegrade - Retail Stick Margarine & Spread Plasticization & Packaging
Emulsion Remelt Tank
179
Margarine & Spread Emulsion Preparation
Scraped Wall Heat Exchanger Resting Tube
Pasteurized Milk or Water
Water Soluble Ingredients Mixing
Retail Soft Tub & Industrial Margarine & Spread Plasticization & Packaging
Margarine or Spread Emulsion
Chiller Supply Tank High Pressure Pump
Margarine Water Soluble Ingredients
Chiller Supply Tank
Emulsion Remelt Tank
High Pressure Pump
Pressure Regulating Valve
Scraped Wall Heat Exchanger
Pressure Regulating Valve
Worker Unit Pump
Print Machine Wrapping and Cartoning
Nitrogen Injection
Filler Soft Tub Packaging Refrigerated Tempering and Storage
Pressure Regulating Valve Extrusion Valve Extrusion Valve Filler
Foodservice and Food Processor Packaging Tempering 85±2°F
Figure 2.12 Typical process flow for margarine or spread.
weighing and adding the oil-soluble ingredients while under agitation. Concurrently, the pasteurized, aqueous phase is prepared by mixing all of the water-soluble ingredients together in a separate vat. Because margarine is a water-in-oil emulsion, the water phase is added to the oil phase. The loose emulsion is agitated and enough heat is applied to maintain the emulsion temperature at 10 to 15°F (5.6 to 8.3°C) above the melting point of the margarine oil base. The emulsion must be continuously agitated because it is not stable in the melted form and will begin to separate within seconds if not constantly mixed. After the emulsion is well mixed to ensure uniformity, it is transferred to the chiller supply tank. Agitation must be continued and a uniform temperature maintained to supply a uniform product to the crystallization process. An alternative continuous emulsion preparation process consists of proportioning pump systems capable of metering individual ingredients of the aqueous phase
180
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
together and also the oil phase components. Inline static mixers are utilized to blend the separate phases, which are then mixed inline and emulsified with another static mixer. After inline blending, the loose emulsion is continuously fed to the crystallization system. The solidification processes for the different margarine types all employ a scraped-surface heat exchanger for rapid chilling, but the other steps are somewhat different for shortening and the other margarine types. The solidification or plasticization process for the four basic margarine types are discussed below. 2.19.5.1 Stick Margarine The temperature of the stick margarine emulsion is adjusted and maintained for most table-grade products that melt below body temperature at 100 to 105°F (37.8 to 40.6°C) before pumping to the scraped-surface heat exchanger. It is rapidly chilled to 40 to 45°F (4.4 to 7.2°C) in less than 30 seconds. Stick margarine requires a stiffer consistency than shortening, which is accomplished with the use of a quiescent tube immediately after the chilling unit. This is a warm water-jacketed cylinder that can contain baffles or perforated plates to prevent the product from channeling through the center of the cylinder. The length of this tube may have to be varied to increase or decrease crystallization time, depending on the product formulation. The supercooled mixture passes directly to a quiescent resting or aging tube for molded print-forming equipment. For filled print equipment, a small blender may be utilized prior to the resting tube to achieve the proper consistency for packaging and a slightly softer finished product. A remelt line is necessary because, in all closed filler systems, some overfeeding must be maintained for adequate product to the filler for weight control. The excess is pumped to a remelt tank and then reintroduced into the product line. Two types of stick margarine forming and wrapping equipment are in use in the United States: molded and filled print. The molded print system initially used an open hopper into which the product was forced from an aging tube through a perforated plate in the form of noodles. The margarine noodles were screw-fed into a forming head and then discharged into the parchment paper-wrapping chamber and finally placed in cartons. Closed molded stick systems now use a crystallization chamber, instead of the aging tube and open hopper arrangement, which fills the mold cavity by line pressure. The filled print system accepts margarine from the quiescent tube with a semifluid consistency. It is filled into a cavity prelined with the parchment or foil interwrap. The interwrap is then folded before the product is ejected from the mold into the cartoning equipment. 2.19.5.2 Soft-Tub Margarine The margarine oil blends for soft-tub margarines are formulated with lower solid-to-liquid ratios than the stick margarine products to produce a spreadable product directly out of the refrigerator or freezer. Crystallization technique contributes to the desirable consistency as well, but the products are too soft to print into sticks, therefore, packaging in plastic tubs or cups with snap-on lids is utilized.
Fats and Oils Processing
181
To fill the container properly, the soft margarine consistency must be semifluid like shortening, thus the crystallization process resembles shortening plasticization more closely than stick margarine processing. The temperature of a typical soft margarine emulsion would be adjusted and maintained at 95 to 105°F (35.0 to 40.6°C) before pumping with a high-pressure pump to the scraped-surface heat exchanger. Creaming gas or nitrogen, added to further improve spreadability, is injected at the suction side of the pump at 8.0% for the most spreadable product and at lower levels for a firmer product. The product is rapidly chilled to an exit temperature of 48 to 52°F (8.9 to 11.1°C). The supercooled margarine mixture then passes through a worker unit to dissipate the heat of crystallization. The shaft in the worker unit revolves at about 35 to 50 rpm with a residence time of approximately 3 minutes. Worked product is then delivered to the filler, where it is forced through an extrusion valve at pressures in the range of 300 to 400 psi (20 to 26.7 bar). Either a rotary or straight-line filler may be used to fill the tubs with margarine. The excess product necessary for a uniform supply to the filler is transferred to a remelt tank and eventually reenters the solidification system. 2.19.5.3 Whipped-Tub Margarine The same equipment used to prepare, crystallize, and package regular soft-tub margarine can be utilized for whipped-tub margarines. The difference during crystallization is the addition of 33% nitrogen gas by volume for a 50% overrun. The nitrogen is injected inline through a flow meter into the suction side of the pump. Larger tubs, required for the increased volume, necessitate change parts for the filling, lidding, and packaging equipment. 2.19.5.4 Liquid Margarine Both retail and commercial liquid margarines can be crystallized with the same equipment and process flow used for soft-tub margarines, depending on the formulation and suspension stability requirements. Liquid margarine oil formulations normally consist of a liquid vegetable oil stabilized with either a β or β′-forming hardfat. β′-stabilized liquid margarine can be prepared using the same rapid crystallization process used to prepare soft-tub margarines omitting the addition of creaming gas. These finished products require refrigerated storage for suspension stability. Liquid margarines formulated with β-forming hardfats, and some processed with β′ formulations, incorporate a crystallization or tempering step to increase fluidity and suspension stability. This crystallization step consists of a holding period in an agitated jacketed vessel to dissipate the heat of crystallization. The product may be filled into containers after the product temperature has stabilized. Some products with higher solid-to-liquid ratios are further processed to stabilize the fluid suspension with either homogenization or a second pass through the scraped-surface heat exchanger before filling. The additional processing for more stable crystallization will increase fluidity and suspension stability, but the increased production costs may not be justifiable.
182
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
2.19.5.5 Industrial Margarines Food-service and food-processor margarines may either be duplicates of the retail products in larger packages or be designed for a specific use, either product- or process-related. Among the specific-use margarines, puff paste or Danish pastry applications are the most difficult with regard to crystallization. The characteristic features of a roll-in margarine are plasticity and firmness. Plasticity is necessary, as the margarines should remain as unbroken layers during repeated folding and rolling operations. Firmness is equally important, as soft and oily margarine is partly absorbed by the dough, thus destroying its role as a barrier between the dough layers. As with shortenings, the ultimate polymorphic form for roll-in margarines is determined by the triglyceride composition, but the rate at which the most stable form is reached can be influenced by mechanical and thermal energy. Therefore, the customary crystallization process for roll-in and baker’s margarines is a duplicate of the shortening plasticization process depicted in Figure 2.10, except that margarines containing water or milk in emulsion form are normally not aerated. The aqueous phase of a margarine emulsion has the same effect as gas incorporation on appearance and performance. Commercial margarine products are usually packaged in 50-pound corrugated fiberboard cartons, 5-gallon plastic pails, 55-gallon drums, or special packaging designed for each specific use. 2.19.6 Tempering Tempering conditions used depend on the type of product and are done to control the consistency and plasticity of the fat product. Table- and kitchen-use margarines do not require any heat treatment after packaging and are tempered at refrigerated temperatures to achieve a loose, structured, and brittle consistency; however, a plasticized shortening or margarine requiring a plastic consistency should be tempered for 40 hours or more in a quiescent state at a temperature slightly above the fill temperature immediately after packaging. During tempering, the crystals transform to the polymorphic form in which they normally exist under ordinary conditions. In practice, holding at 85°F (29.4°C) for 24 to 72 hours or until a stable crystal form is reached is an acceptable compromise. The primary purpose of tempering is to condition the solidified shortening so that it will withstand wide temperature variations in subsequent storage and still have a uniform consistency when brought back to 70 to 75°F (21.1 to 23.9°C), which is the use temperature for a majority of the plasticized shortening and margarines.132 Slow crystallization during tempering favors crystal growth, which extends plasticity for improved creaming properties and baking performance. Tempering involves a relationship between temperature and time. During the tempering period, the heat of transformation must be dissipated as rapidly as possible. If the fats are allowed to retain this heat by virtue of their normal thermalinsulating capacity, an appreciable portion of the crystal might be melted, and the subsequent gradual cooling under normal storage conditions will tend to promote transformation of the remaining crystal to the undesirable β form.
Fats and Oils Processing
183
A plasticized product is tempered when the crystal structure of the hard fraction reaches equilibrium by forming a stable crystal matrix. The crystal structure entraps the liquid portion of the shortening or margarine. The mixture of low- and high-melting components of the solids undergoes a transformation in which the low-melting fractions remelt and then recrystallize into a higher melting, more stable form. This process can take from 1 to 10 days, depending on the product formulation and package size. Small packages temper quicker than the larger packages, which have less surface area exposed to the conditioning temperature. After a plasticized product takes an initial set, some α-crystals are still present. These crystals remelt and slowly recrystallize into the β′ form during tempering. The β′-crystal form is preferred for most plastic shortenings and margarines, especially those designed for creaming or roll-in applications,137 thus β-forming products, such as soybean oil, requiring a wide plastic range are formulated with 5 to 20% of a β′-tending hardfat, such as cottonseed oil, palm oil, or tallow. The β′ hardfat must have a higher melting point than the soybean oil basestock in order for the entire product to crystallize in the stable β′ form. The effect of tempering on a plasticized product can be demonstrated best by performance testing; tempered products will have superior creaming properties and an extended working range enabling use at both high and low temperatures. In some cases, penetration values undergo some change during tempering, showing a softening of the conditioned shortening versus an untempered one. The effect of tempering can also be identified by the product feel; a tempered product will be smoother with a better body, whereas the untempered product will be more brittle and break down sooner when worked. β′-crystal-forming products transferred to a cool temperature environment immediately after chilling and working become permanently hard and brittle, and attempts to recondition these products by subjecting them to tempering conditions have not been successful.138 Once transformation to the more stable crystal form has occurred, lower polymorphs can be obtained again only by melting the product, crystallizing the α form, and repeating the sequence of transformations. 2.19.6.1 Quick Tempering The expense and logistical problems associated with constant temperature rooms for tempering have led several equipment manufacturers to develop mechanical systems in an attempt to eliminate tempering. Most of these systems do not claim complete elimination, but a 50% or more reduction in tempering time. Most of the quick-tempering processes add a postcooling and postkneading, or working, unit to the conventional type of chilling and working systems utilized with tempering. The theory behind these systems is that liquid fat is forced to crystallize individually and rapidly, thus creating smaller, more stable crystals rather than crystallizing onto existing crystals, causing an increase in crystal size or agglomeration as happens in normal tempering. Two basic systems utilizing additional chilling to reduce tempering have been developed to more completely crystallize the product into a stable polymorphic form mechanically. The two systems are compared in Figure 2.13. In
184
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Shortening or Margarine Emulsion Supply Tank Chiller Supply Tank
Remelt Heat Exchanger
High Pressure Pump
Precooler
Mechanical Tempering Alternative No. 1
Scraped Surface Heat Exchanger #1 Scraped Surface Heat Exchanger #2
Worker Unit #1 Worker Unit #2 Scraper Surface Heat Exchanger #3 Scraper Surface Heat Exchanger #4 Pump
Inline Filter Nitrogen Injection
Remelt Heat Exchanger
Pressure Regulating Valve Metal Magnets Mechanical Tempering Alternative No. 2
Worker Unit #1 Extrusion Valve
Scraped Surface Heat Exchanger #3 Scraped Surface Heat Exchanger #4 Static Mixer
Extrusion Valve Extrusion Valve
Worker Unit #2 Pump
Filter Packaging
Extrusion Valve
Extrusion Valve
Filter
Tempering Storage
Figure 2.13 Mechanical tempering alternatives.
both systems, the viscous crystalline material that has been supercooled and worked is recooled to remove the heat of crystallization developed in the working unit. One of the systems employs another working unit after the second chilling cycle, whereas the other is filled immediately after the second chilling unit. The best product quality with postchilling temper is achieved when the product discharge temperature from the second set of chilling units is equivalent to or slightly lower than the exit temperature from the first chilling units. Most shortening and margarine products using a postchilling temper process are filled within a temperature range of 65 to 85°F (18.3 to 29.4°C).
Fats and Oils Processing
185
Performance characteristics equivalent to well-tempered shortening with only 24 hours of conditioning have been claimed for the post-chilled, quick-temper products.139 These systems have received acceptance from many edible-oil processors, but the standard tempering procedures are still practiced by other processors for plastic shortenings and margarines. In many cases, versions of both conventional and quick-temper systems are being utilized to produce the various specialized shortening and margarine products, for example: • Frying shortenings that do not require a plastic consistency are produced with the conventional process with a rapid throughput and are tempered for solidification purposes only. • All-purpose shortenings requiring a wide plastic range either are plasticized conventionally and tempered or utilize a quick temper process. • Pastry or high-solids products are plasticized with one of the two specialized systems, and a short conventional quiescent tempering stage is also employed.
Another procedure developed to instantaneously crystallize fat products to the desired final form utilizes energy instead of cooling. Endres et al.140 found that tempering of shortening with microwave energy produces a substantially improved product with 0.25 to 10 minutes’ exposure. Endres et al.’s U.S. Patent No. 3,469,996 indicates that the microwave tempering could be performed before packaging continuously or after packaging on a batch basis. The typical microwave exposure time was two minutes with a product exit temperature of 95 to 103°F (35.0 to 39.4°C). 2.20 FLAKING Fat flakes describe the higher melting, edible-oil products solidified into a thin flake form for ease of handling, for quicker remelting, or for a specific function in a food product. Flaking rolls, utilized for the chilling of shortening and margarine prior to the introduction of scraped-wall heat exchangers, are still used for the production of fat flakes. Chill rolls have been adapted to produce several different flaked products used to provide distinctive performance characteristics in specialty formulated foods as well as the traditional melting point adjustment function. Consumer demands have created the need for such specialty fat products. Specialty high-melting fat flakes have been developed for specific applications with varied melting points: Specialty Flake Products Melting Point Ranges Product
°F
°C
Low-iodine-value hardfats
125 to 150
52 to 66
Hard emulsifiers
140 to 150
60 to 66
Icing stabilizers
110 to 130
43 to 54
Shortening chips
110 to 115
43 to 46
Confectioners’ fats
97 to 112
36 to 44
186
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
2.20.1 Chill Rolls Chill rolls are available in different sizes, configurations, surface treatments, feeding mechanisms, etc., but most used to flake fats are 4-foot-diameter, hollow metal, cylinders either 9 or 12 feet long, with the surface machined and ground smooth to true cylindrical form. Flaking rolls, internally refrigerated with either flooded or spray systems, turn slowly on longitudinal and horizontal axes. Several options exist for feeding the melted oil product to the chill roll: (1) a trough arrangement positioned at varying locations on the top quarter section of the roll, (2) a dip pan at the bottom of the roll, (3) overhead feeding between the chill roll and a smaller applicator roll, and (4) a double- or twin-drum arrangement operating together with a very narrow space between them where the melted fat product is sprayed for application to both rolls. A thin film of liquid fat is carried over the roll and, as the revolution of the roll continues, the fat is partially solidified. The solidified fat is cleanly scraped from the roll by a doctor blade positioned ahead of the feed mechanism with all of the designs. 2.20.2 Flake Crystallization During chilling, a portion of the fat is supercooled sufficiently to cause very rapid crystallization. The latent heat released by fat crystallization is absorbed by the cooling medium in the roll. In the crystallization of hydrogenated edible-oil products, the sensible heat of the liquid is removed until the temperature of the product is equal to the melting point. At the melting point, heat must be removed to allow crystallization of the product. The quantity of heat associated with this phenomenon is called the heat of crystallization. The sensible heat or specific heat of the most common hardfat products is equal to 27.8 calories per gram (50 BTU/pound). The amount of heat that must be removed to crystallize low-iodine-value hardened oil is 100 times the amount of heat that must be removed to lower the product temperature. Typical coolant temperature requirements for flaked products are Flaked Products Chill Roll Coolant Temperatures Product
°F
°C
Low-iodine-value hardfats
70 max.
21.1 max.
Hard emulsifiers
70 max.
21.1 max.
Icing stabilizers
30 max.
–1.1 max.
Shortening chips
5 max.
–15.0 max.
Confectioners fats
30 max.
–1.1 max.
2.20.3 Flaking Conditions The desired flake product dictates the chill-roll operating conditions and additional treatment necessary before and after packaging; however, some generalizations relative to chill-roll operations and product quality can be made:
Fats and Oils Processing
187
• Crystal structure: Each flaked product has crystallization requirements depending on the source oil, melting point, degree of saturation, and the physical characteristics desired. • Flake thickness: Four controllable variables help determine flake thickness: (1) oil temperature to the roll, (2) chill-roll temperature, (3) speed of the chill roll, and (4) the feed mechanism. Normal flake thickness for most flaked products is 0.03 inches, but it increases for most shortening chips to 0.05 inches. • In-package temperature: Crystallization of the fat flakes is not complete before removal from the chill roll, and heat continues to be released. Heat of crystallization will cause the temperature of a product to rise after packaging if it is not dissipated prior to packaging. The product temperature can increase to the point where partial melting coupled with pressure from stacking will cause the product to fuse together into a large lump. • Flake condition: Glossy or wet flakes are caused by a film of liquid oil on the flake surface due to incomplete solidification. Chill-roll temperatures that are too warm or too cool can cause this condition. High-roll temperatures may not provide sufficient cooling to completely solidify the flake. Low-roll temperatures may shock the oil film, causing the flake to pull away from the surface before it is completely solidified. Under either of these conditions, wet flakes will lump in the package.
2.21 pOWDERED AND BEADED FATS Powdered and beaded fats are specialized products developed for ease of incorporation, handling, melting efficiency, uniform delivery with vibrator addition systems, etc. These products may be produced using a hydrogenated fat only, a hard emulsifier only, a blend of hydrogenated fats and emulsifiers, or fats or emulsifiers incorporated with other ingredients, such as skim milk, corn syrup solids, sodium caseinate, powdered eggs, starch, and other carriers. The blended products are formulated for specialized functions in dairy systems, fillings, prepared mixes, candies, sauces, and other prepared food products. Powdered hard emulsifiers serve the same function as flaked product, but will melt more quickly and can be incorporated into some finished products as is. The hard emulsifiers, hydrogenated fats, or blends of the two serve as stabilizers for peanut butter and other products and act as crystallization promoters, lubricants for breading mixes, pan release agents, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, melting point adjustment, etc. Three principal methods of forming powders or beaded fats are practiced in the United States: (1) spray cooling, (2) grinding flaked product, or (3) spray flaking and grinding. Formulated products with fats, emulsifiers, milk solids, etc., for specialized uses are usually spray-chilled powders. Hardfats and hard emulsifiers are also spray-chilled, but may have a disadvantage for feeding or blending accuracy. The spherical shape of the spray-chilled powders may act as roller bearings to give erratic feeding rates with vibratory feeding systems or may stratify in blends of dry materials. Beaded products produced by grinding flakes or spray flaking and grinding have granular shapes that can be metered at uniform rates with vibratory or screw feeders and resist stratification or separation in mixes with other granular materials.
188
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
2.21.1 Spray Cooling Generally, this process consists of atomizing a molten fat in a crystallization zone maintained under temperature conditions where a very fine mist of the melted fat is contacted with cooled air or gas to cause crystallization of the fat without marked supercooling. By controlling the temperature conditions and residence time in the cooling chamber, all of the sensible heat and virtually all of the latent heat of crystallization are removed with the formation of many crystallization centers by rapid nucleation, accompanied by an optimum of crystal growth of these nuclei. By controlling the crystal growth with conditions of no appreciable supercooling and almost complete dissipation of the heat of crystallization, the equilibrium condition is achieved almost instantly. This equilibrium condition achieves homogeneity in both inter- and intracrystal composition of the fat to produce free-flowing, tempered particles. 2.21.2 Flake Grinding Flaked, low-iodine-value hardfats and hard mono- and diglycerides can be ground with attrition-type mills. This type of mill involves impact of the particles both with each other in the air and against a plate. Air flow can be used to move the ground fats through the equipment. The required air flow is less than involved in spray cooling, but the ground flakes must be separated from the air stream. Precooling of the flakes or the addition of dry ice must be used to lower the temperature of the product below 40°F (4.4°C) before grinding at a sustained rate is possible. The grinding process causes a rise in temperature, which results in material that is too gummy to grind properly. Flakes can be ground successfully if they are well cooled before the grinding operation begins, with the addition of dry ice or air circulation at low enough temperatures to dissipate the heat generated. 2.21.3 Spray Flaking and Grinding This patented continuous process allows the manufacture of powdered fats to utilize a chill roll and permits the immediate grinding of the fat into powder without excessive refrigeration in the flaking roll or further cooling of the product. This process consists of the following steps:141
1. Spray liquid droplets of molten fat onto the cool chill-roll surface, which then solidify rapidly. 2. Remove the solidified droplets from the chill roll with a doctor blade. 3. Classify the solidified fat droplets by size with a vibrating sizing screen. The larger particles are diverted to the grinder, whereas the smaller acceptable-size particles proceed directly to the packaging operation. 4. Return ground material to the vibrating screen for resizing until an acceptable particle size is obtained for packaging. 5. Temper the product at an elevated temperature to transform the crystals to the stable polymorphic form.
Fats and Oils Processing
189
2.22 sALAD AND COOKING OILS PACKAGING Clear salad and cooking oils do not require any further processing after deodorization for packaging except for temperature control for flavor, consistency, and weight control, plus nitrogen protection for oxidative stability. Liquid oils are currently packaged in 8-, 16-, 24-, 32-, 48-, and 64-ounce clear plastic containers as well as 1-gallon opaque plastic containers for the retail market. The same oils and some additional products with additives, such as antifoamers and antioxidants, are packaged in 35-pound or 5-gallon plastic jugs and 425pound closed-head drums for foodservice and food processor customers. Plastic containers have replaced glass and metal containers due to improved economics. Both lower package costs and lighter weight packaging contribute to lower product costs. Salad and cooking oils are sensitive to light, which catalyzes oxidation to produce off-flavors. Sensitizers, such as chlorophyll, may promote photooxidation. Artificial lighting, as well as sunlight, causes this deterioration in oils. Industrial packaging protects the oils, but the clear plastic retail container, like glass, offers little protection after removal from the case at the store. Oxygen contact contributes to the degradation of an oil and is the most critical factor affecting flavor stability. It may gain access to packaged oil in several ways: • • • •
Atmospheric oxygen may be entrained in the oil at packaging. Oxygen may be available in the container headspace. Oxygen may permeate the walls of plastic containers. Impure nitrogen may contain oxygen.
Liquid oils should be protected from both heat and refrigerated temperatures. High temperatures accelerate flavor degradation, and cold temperatures cause crystallization and clouding. Therefore, salad and cooking oils should not be stored in shortening-tempering rooms nor in margarine vaults. Storage and shipment should be at 70 to 75°F (21.1 to 23.9°C).
2.23 bULK OIL SHIPMENTS Food processors that use edible fats and oils in large quantities frequently purchase their requirements in bulk. All of the packaged fat and oil products can be shipped as bulk liquids in tank cars or tank trucks, except complete margarines and spreads. In this case, the margarine base oil can be shipped to the customers. These products must be handled properly during loading, transit, unloading, and storage in the customers’ tanks to ensure acceptable quality at the time of use and consumption. Bulk handling systems for shipping fat and oil products must be designed and operated with three primary considerations for the maintenance of quality: (1) avoid contamination, (2) avoid overheating, and (3) minimize exposure to air.
190
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
2.23.1 Contamination A contaminant is any undesirable material that may taint, infect, corrupt, modify, or degrade by contact or association. The contaminants most likely to affect bulk shipments are • Moisture: Precautions must be taken to protect the fats and oils product from hydrolysis and development of FFA. Moisture sources may be wet tank cars or trucks, steamed lines, ruptured tank car coils, leaking coolers, condensation, rain during loading, etc. • Impurities: The presence of foreign materials in bulk oil shipments is usually caused by a malfunction in the inline load-out filter, inadequate tank cleaning or rinsing, open hatch covers, etc. Rail tank car cleaning is somewhat difficult because of the black iron construction and heating coils that tend to become coated with oxidized and polymerized oil. • Commingling: Inadvertent mixing of two different fats and oils products is a serious contamination. Every fats and oils product has its own specific properties and, depending on its field of application, the tolerance for admixture of other fats is usually very low. Product mixing is usually the result of a mispumping, failure to remove a returned heel in a tank car before loading fresh product, or a malfunctioning valve.
2.23.2 Overheating Most bulk-shipped fats and oils must be heated for pumping to tank cars and trucks and again at the customer’s location with rail cars. Product temperatures should never be at a higher level than necessary. The oxidation rate for fats and oils increases by a factor of 3 for each 20°F (11.1°C); normally a temperature 10 to 15°F (5.6 to 8.3°C) above the melting point is adequate to keep a fats and oils product liquid for pumping. Products received at the customer’s location in a solid or semisolid state should be heated slowly so that they are liquid and homogenous before pumping. Rail tank car overheating can occur with high-pressure steam usage or even with low-pressure steam handled improperly. Heating should start at a time calculated to provide the required temperature without exceeding the maximum rate of 10°F (5.6°C) per 24 hours. When steam is used, the steam pressure should not exceed 1.5 kg/cm2 to prevent localized overheating. 2.23.3 Air Exposure Oxidation results when fats and oils are exposed to air, which decreases stability and produces poor flavors. Air can be almost completely excluded by maintaining a nitrogen atmosphere at all stages after deodorization; however, most tank cars and trucks cannot be pressurized to maintain a complete nitrogen blanket. Nitrogen sparging into the stream of oil as it is loading will saturate the oil, plus an excess. This excess is released when the oil is loaded into the tanker to displace air in the headspace. This practice requires about 5 cubic feet of nitrogen per 1000 pounds of
Fats and Oils Processing
191
oil. Additionally, the loading lines should discharge near the bottom of the tanker to minimize aeration of the product. Allowing heated fats and oils to cascade or fall through the air into the tanker allows the product to splash and aerate. REFERENCES
1. Lusas, E.W. and Rhee, K.C., Animal and vegetable fats, oils and waxes, in Riegel’s Handbook of Industrial Chemistry, 9th ed., Kent, J.A., Ed., Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York, 1992, pp. 288–297. 2. Carr, R.A., Oilseeds processing, in Technology and Solvents for Extracting Oilseeds and Nonpetroleum Oils, Wan, P.J. and Wakelyn, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1997, pp. 101–112. 3. Johnson, L.A., Recovery of fats and oils from plant and animal sources, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.A., and Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 108–135. 4. Carlson, K.F. and Scott, J.D., Recent developments and trends in oilseeds and fats and oils processing, INFORM, 2, 1034–1060, 1991. 5. Brink, H.B. and van Duijn, G., Refined seed oil production: A milder future? INFORM, 14, 274–275, 2003. 6. Norris, F.A., Extraction of fats and oils, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, Swern, D., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982, pp. 175–201, 245–246. 7. Brueske, G.D., Oil/meal separation processes, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed Technology and Utilization, T.A. Applewhite, Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1993, pp. 126–135. 8. O’Brien, R.D. and Wan, P.J., Cottonseed oil, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed Processing and Utilization, Wilson, T.F., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2001, p. 106. 9. Fedeli, E., Miscellaneous exotic oils, JAOCS, 60, 404, 1983. 10. Eng, T.G. and Tat, M.M., Quality control in fruit processing, JAOCS, 62, 278, 1985. 11. Weidermann, L.H., Degumming, refining and bleaching soybean oil, JAOCS, 58, 159– 165, 1981. 12. Swoboda, P.A.T., Chemistry of refining, JAOCS, 62, 287–291, 1985. 13. Segers, J.C., Pretreatment of edible oils for physical refining, JAOCS, 60, 262–264, 1983. 14. Tandy, D.C. and McPherson, W.J., Physical refining of edible oil, JAOCS, 62, 1253– 1261, 1984. 15. Carlson, K., Acid and alkali refining of canola oil, INFORM, 4, 273–281, 1993. 16. List, G.R. et al., Steam refined soybean oil: Effect of refining and degumming methods on oil quality, JAOCS, 55, 277–279, 1978. 17. Brian, R., Soybean lecithin processing unit operations, JAOCS, 53, 27, 1976. 18. Carr, R.A., Refining and degumming systems for edible fats and oils, JAOCS, 55, 765–771, 1978. 19. Young, F.V.K., Physical refining, in Edible Fats and Oils Processing: Basic Principals and Modern Practices, World Conference Proceedings, Erickson, D.R., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1990, pp. 124–135. 20. Dijkstra, A.J., Degumming, refining, washing and drying fats and oils, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed Technology and Utilization, Applewhite, T.H., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1993, pp. 138–151.
192
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
21. Ringers, H.J., and Segers, J.C., Degumming process for triglyceride oils, U.S. Patent No. 4,049,686, 1977. 22. Münch, W.M., Practical experience of enzymatic degumming, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed Processing and Utilization, Wilson, R.F., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2001, pp. 17–20. 23. Dijkstra, A.J. and van Opstal, M., Process for producing degummed vegetable oils and gums of high phospholipids acid content, U.S. Patent No. 4,698,185, 1987. 24. Grace Davison, The Amazing Characteristics of Trisyl Silica, Columbia, MD. 25. Pagliero, C., et al, Degumming of crude soybean oil by ultra filtration using polymeric membranes, JAOCS, 78, 793–796, 2001. 26. Subramanian, S. et al, Evaluation of surfactant-aided degumming of vegetable oils by mmbrane technology, JAOCS, 76, 1247–1253, 1999. 27. Carlson, K., Recent developments and trends in processing of fats and oils, INFORM, 17, 671–674, 2006. 28. Farr, W.E., Refining of fats and oils, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., R.D. O’Brien, W.E. Farr, and P.J. Wan, Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 136–157. 29. Sullivan, F.E., Refining of oils and fats, JAOCS, 45, 564A–582A, 1968. 30. Erickson, D.R., Optimum and adjusted refining practices for soybean oil, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed Processing and Utilization, Wilson, R.F., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2001, pp. 74–79. 31. Carlson, K., Recent developments and trends in processing of fats and oils, INFORM, 17, 671–674, 2006. 32. Braae, B., Degumming and refining practices in Europe, JAOCS, 53, 353–357, 1976. 33. Crauer, L.S., Continuous refining of crude cottonseed miscella, JAOCS, 41, 656–661, 1964. 34. Cavanagh, G.C., Miscella refining, JAOCS, 53, 361–363, 1976. 35. Hendrix, W.B., Current practices in continuous cottonseed miscella refining, JAOCS, 61, 1369–1372, 1984. 36. Norris, F.A., Refining and bleaching, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 2, 4th ed., Swern, D., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982, pp. 259, 273–276, 285, 290. 37. Erickson, D.R., Batch or kettle refining, in Practical Handbook of Soybean Processing and Utilization, Erickson, D.R., Ed., Champaign, IL, AOCS Press and the United Soybean Board, Champaign, IL, 1995, pp. 186–187. 38. Farr, W.E., Refining of fats and oils, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, O’Brien, R.D. et al, Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 152–154. 39. American Oil Chemists Society, The Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 4th ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1994. 40. Carr, R.A., Degumming and refining practices in the U.S., JAOCS, 53, 347–352, 1976. 41. Levin, H. and Swearingen, J.S., An inexpensive soap stock conversion plant, JAOCS, 30, 85–86, 1953. 42. Hong, W.M., Quality of byproducts from chemical and physical refining of palm oil and other oils, JAOCS, 60, 316–321, 1983. 43. Beal, P.E. et al., Treatment of soybean oil soapstock to reduce pollution, JAOCS, 49, 447–449, 1972. 44. Woerfel, J.B., Processing and utilization of by-products from soy oil processing, JAOCS, 58, 188–191, 1981.
Fats and Oils Processing
193
45. Ohlson, R. and Swensson, C., Comparison of oxalic acid and phosphoric acid as degumming agents for vegetable oils, JAOCS, 53, 8–11, 1976. 46. Szuhaj, B.F., Lecithin production and utilization, JAOCS, 60, 308, 1983. 47. Ziegelitz, R., Lecithin processing possibilities, INFORM, 6, 1226, 1995. 48. Rich, A.D., Major factors that influence bleaching performance, JAOCS, 44, 298A–300A, 323A–324A, 1967. 49. Richardson, L.L., Use of bleaching clays in processing edible oils, JAOCS, 55, 777, 1978. 50. Morgan, D.A. et al., The function of bleaching earths in the processing of palm, palm kernel, and coconut oils, JAOCS, 62, 292–299, 1985. 51. Rini, S.J., Refining, bleaching, stabilization, deodorization, and plasticization of fats, oils, and shortening, JAOCS, 37, 515–520, 1960. 52. Goebel, E.H., Bleaching practices in the U.S., JAOCS, 53(6), 342–343, 1976. 53. Rich, A.D., Some basic factors in the bleaching of fatty oils, JAOCS, 41, 315–321, 1964. 54. Patterson, H.B.W., Bleaching practices in Europe, JAOCS, 53, 341, 1976. 55. Mag, T.K., Bleaching — Theory and practice, in Edible Fats and Oils Proceedings, Basic Principals and Modern Practices: World Proceedings, D. R. Erickson, Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1990, pp. 107–116. 56. Brekke, O.L., Bleaching, in Handbook of Soy Oil Processing and Utilization, D. R. Erickson et al., Eds., AOCS, Champaign, IL, and American Soybean Oil Association, St. Louis, MO, 1980, pp. 120, 122, 123. 57. Butterworth, E.R., Separation methods in processing edible oils, JAOCS, 55, 781–782, 1978. 58. Latondress, E.G., Oil–solids separation in edible oil processing, JAOCS, 60, 259–260, 1983. 59. Ong, J.T., Oil recovery from spent bleaching earth and disposal of the extracted material, JAOCS, 60, 314–315, 1983. 60. Hong, W.M., Quality of byproducts from chemical and physical refining of palm oil and other oils, JAOCS, 60, 316–318, 1983. 61. Svensson, C., Use or disposal of byproducts and spent material from vegetable oil processing industry in Europe, JAOCS, 53, 443–444, 1976. 62. Allen, R.R., Hydrogenation, JAOCS, 37, 521–523, 1960. 63. Allen, R.R., Hydrogenation, principals and catalyst, JAOCS, 45, 312A–314A, 340A–341A, 1968. 64. Allen, R.R., Principals and catalyst for hydrogenation of fats and oils, JAOCS, 55, 792–795, 1978. 65. Allen, R.R., Theory of hydrogenation and isomerization, in Hydrogenation: Proceedings of an AOCS Colloquium, Hastert, R., Ed., AOCS, Champaign, IL, 1987, pp. 1–10. 66. Haumann, B.F., Tools, hydrogenation, interesterification, INFORM, 5, 668–678, 1994. 67. Beers, A. and Mangnus, G., Hydrogenation of edible oils for reduced trans-fatty acid content, INFORM, 15, 404–405, 2004. 68. Hastert, R.C., The Partial Hydrogenation of Edible Oils, American Oil Chemists’ Society Short Course, Phoenix, AZ, 1988. 69. Beckmann, H.J., Hydrogenation process, JAOCS, 60, 286–288, 1983. 70. Lantondress, E.G., Formulation of products from soybean oil, JAOCS, 58, 185, 1981. 71. Wiederman, L.H., Versatility of fats and oils utilization, in Military Food and Package Systems Activities Report, 27, 100–103, 1975.
194
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
72. Lanning, S.J., Chemical interesterification of palm, palm kernel, and coconut oils, JAOCS, 62, 400–404, 1985. 73. Sreenivasan, B., Interesterification of fats, JAOCS, 55, 796–805, 1978. 74. Norris, F.A., A new approach to the glyceride structure of natural fats, JAOCS, 24, 275, 1947. 75. List, G.R., Mounts, T.L., Orthoefer, F., and Neff, W.E., Effect of interesterification on the structure and physical properties of high-stearic acid soybean oils, JAOCS 74, 327– 329, 1997. 76. Sonntag, N.O.V., Fat splitting, esterification, and interesterification, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, Swern, D., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1982, pp. 148–155. 77. Lampert, D., Processes and products of interesterification, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E., and Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 208–234. 78. Going, L.H., Interesterification products and processes, JAOCS, 44, 414A–422A, 454A–456A, 1967. 79. Young, F.V.K., Palm kernel and coconut oils: Analytical characteristics, process technology and uses, JAOCS, 60, 378, 1983. 80. Rozendaal, A., Interesterification and fractionation, in Processing of the World Conference on Oilseed Technology and Utilization, Applewhite, T.H., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1995, pp. 180–185. 81. Hawley, H.K. and Holman, G.W., Directed interesterification as a new processing tool for lard, JAOCS, 33, 29–35, 1956. 82. Macrae, A.R., Lipase–catalyzed interesterification of oils and fats, JAOCS, 60, 291–294, 1983. 83. Quinlan, P. and Moore, S., Modification of triglycerides by lipases, process technology and its application to the production of nutritionally improved fats, INFORM, 4, 580–585, 1993. 84. Fogilia, T.A.. and Villeneuve, P., Lipase specifications: Potential applications in lipid bioconversions, INFORM, 8, 640–650, 1997. 85. Weiss, T.J., Salad oil manufacture and control, JAOCS, 44, 146A–148A, 186A, 1967. 86. Puri, P.S., Winterization of oils and fats, JAOCS, 57, 848A–850A, 1980. 87. Stirton, A.J., Fractionation of fats and fatty acids, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 3rd ed., Swern, D., Ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1964, pp. 1008–1009. 88. Cavanagh, C.C., Seed to salad oil in 18 hours, Food Process., 22(4), 38–45, 1961. 89. Neumunz, G.M., Old and new in winterizing, JAOCS, 55, 396A–398A, 1978. 90. Haraldsson, G., Degumming, dewaxing and refining, JAOCS, 60, 259, 1983. 91. Leibovitz, Z. and Ruckenstein, C., Winterization of sunflower oil, JAOCS, 61(5), 870– 872, 1984. 92. Kreulen, H.P., Fractionation and winterization of edible fats and oils, JAOCS, 53, 393– 396, 1976. 93. Kellens, M. and Hendrix, M., Fractionation, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E., Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 199–207. 94. Rossell, J.B., Fractionation of lauric oils, JAOCS, 62, 385–390, 1985. 95. Defense, E., Fractionation of palm oil, JAOCS, 62, 376–385, 1985. 96. Thomas, A.E. and Paulicka, R.R., Solvent fractionated fats, Chem. Ind. September, 774– 779, 1976.
Fats and Oils Processing
195
97. Shahidi, R. and Shukla, V.K.S., Nontriacylglycerol constituents of fats, oils, INFORM, 7, 1227–1232, 1996. 98. Flider, F.J. and Orthoefer, F.T., Metals in soybean oil, Proceedings of the World Conference on Soya Processing and Utilization, AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1981, p. 271. 99. Lampbert, D., Processes and products of interesterification, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., R.D. O’Brien, W.E. Farr, and P.J. Wan, Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, p. 219. 100. Anon., New process removes cholesterol from fats, INFORM, 1, 366–368, 1990. 101. Birnbaum, H., The monoglycerides, manufacture, concentration, derivatives and applications, Bakers Dig., 55, 6–16, 1981. 102. Rice, E.E., Materials of construction in the fatty acid industry, JAOCS, 56, 754A–758A, 1979. 103. Feuge, R.O., Derivatives of fats for use as foods, JAOCS, 39, 525–526, 1962. 104. Van Haften, J.L., Fat-based emulsifiers, JAOCS, 56, 833A, 1967. 105. Nash, N.H. and Knight, G.S., Polyfunctional quality improvers: Polyglycerol esters, Food Eng. Mag., May, 79–82, 1967. 106. McIntyre, R.T., Polyglycerol esters, JAOCS, 56, 835A–840A, 1997. 107. Wrenn, L.B., Pioneer oil chemists: Allbright, Wesson, INFORM, 6, 98–99, 1995. 108. Morris, C.E., Mechanics of deodorization, JAOCS, 26, 607–610, 1949. 109. White, F.B., Deodorization, JAOCS, 33, 495–506, 1956. 110. Zehnder, C.T., Deodorization 1975, JAOCS, 53, 364–369, 1976. 111. Gavin, A.M., Deodorization and finished oil handling, JAOCS, 58, 175–184, 1981. 112. Durdow, F.A., Deodorization of edible oils, JAOCS, 60, 272–274, 1983. 113. Kellens, M. and De Greyt, W., Deodorization, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E., and Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 235–268. 114. Ahrens, D., Comparison of tray, film deodorization, INFORM, 9, 566–576, 1998. 115. Bernardini, M., Deodorization, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed Technology and Utilization, Applewhite, T.H., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1993, pp. 186–193. 116. Reeves, R.M., Thermal heating fluids, INFORM, 9, 549–551, 1998. 117. Johansson, G.M.R., Finished oil handling and storage in Europe, JAOCS, 53, 410–413, 1976. 118. Gilbert, W.J. and Tandy, D.C., Odor control in edible oil processing, JAOCS, 56, 654A–658A, 1979. 119. Watson, K.S. and Meiehoefer, C.H., Use or disposal of by-products and spent material from the vegetable oil processing industry in the U.S., JAOCS, 53, 437–442, 1976. 120. Svensson, C., Use or disposal of by-products and spent material from the vegetable oil processing industry in Europe, JAOCS, 53, 443–445, 1976. 121. Wright, L.M., Finished oil handling and storage in the U.S., JAOCS, 53, 408–409, 1976. 122. Buck, D.F., Antioxidants in soya oil, JAOCS, 58, 275–278, 1981. 123. Sherwin, E.R., Antioxidants for vegetable oils, JAOCS, 53, 430–436, 1976. 124. Eastman Chemical Company, Tenox Natural Tocopherols, Technical Data Bulletin ZG–263, 1990. 125. Chahine, M.H. and MacNeill, R.F., Effect of stabilization of crude whale oil with tertiary butylhydroquinone and other antioxidants upon keeping quality of resultant deodorized oil, JAOCS, 51, 37–41, 1974.
196
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
126. Sherwin, E.R., Antioxidants for food fats and oils, JAOCS, 49, 468–472, 1972. 127. Luckadoo, B.M. and Sherwin, E.R., Tertiary butylhydroquinone as antioxidant for crude sunflower seed oil, JAOCS, 49, 95–97,1972. 128. Sherwin, E.R. and Luckadoo, B.M., Studies on antioxidant treatment of crude vegetable oils, JAOCS, 47, 19–23, 1970. 129. Kraybill, H.R. et al., Butylated hydroxyanisole as an antioxidant for animal fats, JAOCS, 26, 449–453, 1949. 130. Sanhueza, J., Nieto, S., and Valenzuela, A., Thermal stability of some commercial synthetic antioxidants, JAOCS, 77, 933–936, 2000. 131. Mattil, K.F., Plastic shortening agents, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 3rd ed., Swern, D., Ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1964, pp. 272–281. 132. Joyner, N.T., The plasticization of edible fats, JAOCS, 30, 526–538, 1953. 133. McMichael, C.E., Finishing and packaging of edible fats, JAOCS, 33, 512–516, 1956. 134. Slaughter, Jr., J.E., Plasticizing and packaging, Proceedings of a Six-Day Short Course in Vegetable Oils, The American Oil Chemists’ Society, Conducted by The University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 1948, pp. 119–131. 135. Brown, L.C., Emulsion food products, JAOCS, 26, 634, 1949. 136. Fincher, H.D., General discussion of processing edible oil seeds and edible oils, JAOCS, 30, 479–481, 1953. 137. Hoerr, C.W. and Ziemba, J.V., Fat crystallography points way to quality, Food Eng. Mag., 37(5), 90, 1965. 138. Weiss, T.J., Basic processing of fats and oils, in Food Oils and Their Uses, 2nd ed., AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1983, pp. 96–97. 139. Reigel, G.W. and McMichael, C.E., The production of quick–tempered shortenings, JAOCS, 43, 687–689, 1966. 140. Endres, J.G., Wrobel, R.J., and Rendek, R.B., U.S. Patent No. 3,469,996, 1969. 141. Campbell, Jr., R.L., Wood, C.H., and Brust, A.E., U.S. Patent No. 3,514,297, 1970.
Chapter 3
Fats and Oils Analysis
3.1 INTRODUCTION The use of fats and oils prior to the beginning of the nineteenth century was based on practical knowledge that had been accumulated slowly over many centuries. Today, fats and oils products are developed and subsequent production controlled with knowledge of their composition, structural and functional properties, and the expected reactions obtained through the application of scientific research. Progress in the utilization of fats and oils for the production of useful products is dependent on a thorough knowledge of the characteristics of the raw materials, the changes effected by each process, and the requirements of the individually prepared food product. Physical, chemical, and performance analyses are the tools available to fats and oils processors for the purchase of raw materials, development of new products, and evaluation of the products produced. Analyses of fats and oils are required for a number of applications, beginning with commodity trading. In every fat and oil processing plant, there are analytical requirements for process quality control. In refining, for example, evaluating the free fatty acid (FFA) content of the oil is necessary to determine the caustic treat, to determine if the oil has been properly deodorized, and to serve as a quality indicator in other areas. Melting points, fat solids content, and other physical evaluations indicate that the product will function as developed. For final edible-oil products, organoleptic evaluations, peroxide value, FFA, and other analyses are utilized for assurance that the product has the required bland flavor, with predictive analysis, such as active oxygen method (AOM) stability being utilized to ensure proper shelf life. Nutritional listings of saturates, trans, polyunsaturates, cholesterol, vitamins, and other product characteristics on food product labels require accurate analysis to identify the original values and to ensure compliance with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requirements. Also of importance are analyses for trace constituents, such as pesticides or trace metals, to ensure compliance with governmental regulations. Investigative analyses are frequently required in fats and oils processing. Identifying the oils and physical characteristics of a somewhat mysterious product that arises as a result of a mispumping or some other mishap is required to identify 197
198
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
the opportunities for salvaging the product. Analyses are also needed to determine the cause of product failures identified by quality evaluations of finished products or as a result of customer complaints. Specialty and tailored fats have individual analytical requirements in terms of chemical, physical, consistency, nutritional, performance, and other properties that must be measured and maintained to ensure that products function as designed. The diversity of products and applications amplifies the need for analytical information and the ability to interpret the meaning of the results. The analytical methods employed should be those that are universally accepted in the industry, both by the suppliers of the raw materials and by the purchasers of the finished products. Historically, development of analytical methods for fats and oils has been undertaken by the processors, professional societies, end users, academic community, and government-sponsored research agencies. Development of analytical procedures was one of the main reasons for forming the Society of Cotton Products Analysts, which became the American Oil Chemists’ Society (AOCS). Methods standardization remains a major goal for AOCS, and procedures with wide interest and application become a part of the Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. The AOCS methods are continually updated, with unused or less satisfactory methods being dropped and new procedures being added. Other standardized methods with potential application are published by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists’ (AOAC), American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), and American Association of Cereal Chemists (AACC). 3.2 NONFATTY IMPURITIES Impurities present in fats and oils are contaminates that must be removed during processing to prevent an adverse reaction or an undesirable appearance. Most of the trading rules for edible oil products have specific limits for the various nonfatty materials. Analysis for these materials during processing is part of good process control, and quality processors have stringent as-shipped requirements for finished products to prevent these contaminants from reaching the customer. The nonfatty impurities analytical methods are identified by the predominate contaminant in most cases. 3.2.1 Moisture Analysis Moisture can contaminate a fat or oil in many different ways: condensation, broken coils, intentional addition during processing, etc. Continued presence of moisture will induce hydrolysis with a resultant FFA increase and off-flavors. Some of the analytical methods to identify and quantify moisture are discussed below. 3.2.1.1 Hot Plate Method One of the most common methods of determining moisture in a fat or oil is AOCS Method Ca 2b-38 for Moisture and Volatile Matter.1 Approximately 10 grams
Fats and Oils Analysis
199
of a representative sample is heated in a beaker with gentle agitation on a hot plate until foaming stops and incipient smoking begins. The loss in weight between the beginning and the ending sample represents the moisture and volatile matter. 3.2.1.2 Air Oven Method The results of the air oven method (AOCS Ca 2c-25)1 are more accurate and reliable, but also more time consuming than the hot plate method. For the air oven method, approximately 5 grams of a representative sample is weighed into a dried, tared moisture dish and dried in the oven for 30 minutes at 101°C (± 1°C). This procedure is repeated until a constant weight is determined. The loss in weight is calculated as the moisture and volatile matter. 3.2.1.3 Vacuum Oven Method AOCS Ca 2d-251 provides more accurate results than the hot plate and air oven procedures and is especially applicable where moisture is deep seated and must diffuse largely through the capillaries. The same procedure as for the air oven method is observed, except that the vacuum should not exceed 100 mmHg at a temperature 20 to 25°C above the boiling point of water at the operating pressure until a constant weight is obtained in successive one-hour drying periods. Again, the weight loss is calculated as the moisture and volatile matter. 3.2.1.4 Karl Fisher Method This method is adaptable for determining moisture in a wide variety of materials and has been adapted by many laboratories as a standard test procedure for moisture. The Karl Fisher volumetric method for moisture may be determined by ordinary visual titration or by an electrometric method. The titration endpoint is a color change from yellow to brown. The electrometric method of titration for moisture is more accurate when dark solutions are encountered and enables a less experienced technician to correctly identify the endpoint. An automatic titration speeds up the analysis with an even better degree of accuracy. AOCS Method Ca 2e-841 indicates that the precision for the Karl Fisher moisture determination by the same operator is 0.6% relative. 3.2.1.5 Skillet Moisture This simple, qualitative method determines very quickly if moisture is present in a sample. It involves pouring a small amount of the sample into a hot skillet previously heated until the sample begins smoking. An absence of moisture is indicated by a lack of reaction, and any popping or spitting indicates the presence of moisture. This qualitative evaluation, with results usually reported as simply wet or dry, can be used to determine if a more quantitative result is required.
200
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
3.2.2 Impurities Analysis Foreign material in incoming crude edible oils or incorporated during processing must be removed by filtration or another process to produce an acceptable finished product. The following methods and procedures have been effective for identifying the existence of a problem and confirming that the impurities have been removed before subsequent processing or shipment: 3.2.2.1 Insoluble Impurities Meal, dirt, seed fragments, and other substances insoluble in kerosene or petroleum ether are the impurities identified by AOCS Method 3a461 normally identified by trading rules for crude vegetable oils. This method utilizes the residue from the moisture and volatile matter determinations or another sample prepared in the same manner. It is dissolved in 50 milliliters of kerosene and then vacuum filtered through a Gooch crucible. After washing with warm kerosene and petroleum ether, the crucible is dried and weighed. The gain in weight of the crucible is noted and the percentage of insoluble impurities is calculated. 3.2.2.2 Filterable Impurities (Standard Disk Method) During processing, small quantities of undissolved impurities may be picked up from polymerized oil deposits, charred materials, salt formed after a reaction, filter aids, bleaching earths, or some other foreign material. These materials should be removed by one or more of the filtering systems in the process, but an evaluation procedure will ensure that the systems are operating properly and are properly sized to remove all of the foreign materials before shipment to the consumer. A suggested procedure for evaluating filterable impurities is to filter a standard quantity (500 grams) of heated (70 to 90°C) oil sample with a vacuum suction funnel through a Whatmann No. 2 filter disk. After filtering, wash the funnel and filter disk with a suitable solvent. Compare the filter disk to standard impurities disks previously prepared to identify the degree of acceptability. 3.2.2.3 Turbidimeter Impurities The amount of undissolved impurities in oil can be rapidly determined with the use of a turbidimeter. Product samples are usually heated to 70°C (± 1.0°C) and allowed to stand 5 to 10 minutes in a controlled-temperature oven after being poured into the prescribed sample bottles to eliminate air bubbles. The turbidimeter readings can be converted to part-per-million (ppm) impurities with a predetermined calibrated curve. Experience has shown that this method cannot be used for meat fats and products containing emulsifiers because they contain turbid materials other than those effectively measured by this procedure.
Fats and Oils Analysis
201
3.2.3 Trace Metals Analysis Throughout the processing of edible fats and oils, metals can be encountered, many of which reduce the efficiency of the process or cause deterioration of the product quality. The most notable of these metals are copper, iron, calcium, magnesium, sodium, lead, zinc, and nickel. Various procedures have been used for determining minute quantities of the trace metals in edible-oil products. Several qualitative methods for iron and nickel are available, but the sensitivity for these methods is limited. These evaluations perform adequately only when it is necessary to confirm that a product contains less of a trace metal than the established limits of the procedure. Initially, these wet chemical analyses were the only quality control analyses available, but improved trace metal determination procedures have been introduced; flame atomic absorption spectroscopy was improved by replacing the flame with a graphite furnace, and more recently plasma emission spectroscopy, inductive coupled plasma (ICP) has been introduced. At one time, these procedures were initially performed only by technical research laboratories or by a centralized quality control laboratory; however, now it is recommended that each refinery have the capability to perform these sensitive trace metal analyses 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. These procedures do require well-trained operators, but reliable trace metal information is necessary to maintain refinery yields and improve quality.2 3.2.4 Soap Analysis In caustic refining, sodium hydroxide is introduced to the oil to react with the FFA and produce soaps. Traces of soap remaining in the oil after refining and bleaching poison hydrogenation catalysts and have a detrimental effect upon the oxidative stability of deodorized oils at levels below 5 ppm. Two AOCS methods are available for determining soap:1 Cc 15-60, a conductivity procedure, and Cc17-79, a titration procedure. Soap analyses are also useful investigative tools for evaluating the cause of early breakdown of frying fats. Trace amounts of caustic cleaning materials left in deep-fat fryers will react with the FFA present to produce soaps, which shorten the frying life of the shortening as exhibited by foaming, off-flavor, high absorption, etc. 3.3 MELTING, SOLIDIFICATION, AND CONSISTENCY The data obtained from melting points, solids fat index methods, and other solidification procedures are all used to predict the consistency of the finished product. For edible fats and oils products, the liquid/solids levels at the various temperatures in relation to body temperature can give good indications of the mouth feel, gumminess, workability, and overall general behavior at cool, ambient, and elevated temperatures. The melting and solidification procedures are the most frequently and routinely performed evaluations in fats and oils laboratories, both for quality control and for product development. They are useful to control production and help identify unknown samples and are critical in new product formulation.
202
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
3.3.1 Melting Point Analysis Melting point is usually defined as the point at which a material changes from a solid to a liquid; however, natural fats do not have a true melting point. Pure compounds have sharp and well-defined melting points, but fats and oils are complex mixtures of compounds that pass through a gradual softening before becoming completely liquid. This melting procedure is further complicated by the fact that fat crystals can exist in several polymorphic modifications, depending on the specific triglycerides involved and the temperature/time pretreatment (tempering) of the sample. The different crystal forms are often stable enough to exhibit distinctive melting points; therefore, instead of melting point, melting range or melting interval is more correct. For a melting point, one point within the melting range must be selected with a defined method. Only with rigid and specific definition of the conditions of the fat pretreatment and the test procedure can a melting point be determined. Many methods have been devised to determine the melting point or a point close to it, some by direct observation and some by indirect and objective processes.3 The advantage of most melting point methods is their relative simplicity, but the dependence of the melting point on the sample pretreatment and on the method used must be considered a disadvantage. Several fats and oils melting point procedures have been standardized by AOCS and other associations. The melting point methods vary considerably in the endpoint determination, conditioning of the sample, amount of automation, time requirements, attention required, degree of melt, and so on. 3.3.1.1 Capillary Melting Point AOCS Method Cc 1-251 is essentially the procedure used by the organic chemist for determining the melting point of pure organic compounds. In this method, capillary tubes (1-mm inside diameter) are filled to a height of 10 millimeters with melted fat; the end is sealed and tempered 16 h at 4 to 10°C. After tempering, the tubes are heated in a bath at 0.5°C per minute, starting 8 to 10°C below the expected melting point, until the fat becomes completely clear. It has been difficult to reproduce results with this method because of the subjective interruption of the completely clear endpoint. 3.3.1.2 Softening Point This open capillary tube melting point method (AOCS Method Cc 3-25)1 follows the closed capillary tube procedure, except the tube is not sealed and the endpoint is the physical movement of the fat column under a standardized hydrostatic pressure. This objective determination is a definite advantage for better reproducibility of results. 3.3.1.3 Slipping Point AOCS Method Cc 4-251 is based on the same principle as the open capillary melting point or the softening point method, except that only plasticized or solidified
Fats and Oils Analysis
203
samples are placed in metal tubes that are heated at a rate of 0.5°C per minute while immersed in a brine solution in a 600-milliliter beaker. The endpoint for this method is the temperature when the fat rises from the cylinder. This method is useful for finished products, and the endpoint is determined objectively, but the sample lacks laboratory pretreatment, so the results can be influenced by the nonstandardized history of the product. 3.3.1.4 Wiley Melting Point At one time, AOCS Method Cc 2-381 was the most popular method in North America for determining a melting point. A fat disk is solidified and chilled in a metal form for two hours or more. The disk is then suspended in an alcohol– water bath and slowly heated while being stirred with a rotating thermometer. The Wiley melting point occurs when the fat disk becomes completely spherical. The subjective interpretation of the endpoint is again a major disadvantage, and slight variation in sample tempering or heating rate interferes with reproducibility of the results. Another major disadvantage is the constant attention required to determine the endpoint. 3.3.1.5 Mettler Dropping Point AOCS Method Cc 18-801 utilizes a Mettler Instrument Corporation (Princeton, New Jersey) control unit and dropping furnace. A sample cup designed for the furnace is filled with approximately 17 drops of the melted fat sample and tempered in a freezer for 15 minutes. The cold solidified sample is warmed in the temperatureprogrammed furnace until it becomes fluid enough to flow. When the sample flows, it trips a photoelectric circuit, which records the temperature on a digital readout. This procedure has become a standard in most fats and oils laboratories due to the advantages it offers over the other melting point methods: fully automatic endpoint determination, good correlation of results with Wiley melting point results, less than an hour elapsed time required for complete results, and the ability to analyze products with low melting points. 3.3.2 Solid–Liquid Relationships The proportion of solid to liquid fat in a shortening, margarine, or other fat and oil product at a given temperature has an important relationship to the performance of the product at that temperature. This proportion cannot be determined from single-point melting analysis or any of the other analysis of the physical properties. Estimates of the solids and liquids contents in a fat at different temperatures over the melting range can be made with calorimetric, dilatometric, or nuclear magnetic resonance procedures. Solids fat index (SFI) by dilatometry, developed in the early 1930s, became the preeminent analysis performed in fats and oils laboratories to control the consistency of finished products. This parameter has become the single most important criterion
204
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
for establishing specifications regarding melting behavior and crystalline structure. Despite its importance, the SFI method is time consuming and labor intensive and requires more maintenance than the majority of the other analysis performed; therefore, the fats and oils industry has long sought a less time consuming, more automated, less expensive procedure that would provide comparable results.4 Many European and Asian fats and oils processors adopted nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) to determine solids fat contents in the late 1970s. SFI remained the preferred method in the United States primarily because the solid fat content (SFC) results by NMR are significantly different than those obtained by SFI with dilatometry and there is no simple equation to convert SFI to SFC or visa versa. Therefore, adoption of the SFC method would: (1) invalidate the extensive SFI libraries, except for basic trends, and (2) require a reeducation and approval of the food processors. In 2006, the AOCS Uniform Methods Committee unanimously voted to move Method Cd 10-57 for Solids Fat Index to surplus status. This action indicates that the SFI method will no longer be recognized, leaving two methods Cd 16-81 (indirect method) and Cd 16b-93 (direct method), both titled Solid Fat Content by LowResolution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, as the options for solids fat analysis.6 A comparison of the SFI and SFC procedures is discussed below. 3.3.2.1 Solids Fat Index Solids fat index is an empirical measure of the solids fat content. It is calculated from the specific volume at various temperatures utilizing a dilatometric scale measured in units of milliliters times 1000. It should be recognized that the SFI results are arbitrary because assumptions are made and liberties are taken insofar as precise measurement is concerned, including (1) use of volumetric instead of gravimetric measurements, (2) use of solutions other than mercury as the confining liquid, (3) assumption that the slopes of the liquid and solids lines are parallel, (4) assumption that the slope of the liquid line is the same for all fats, and (5) assumption that the melting dilation is 0.1. Some of the assumptions were made out of necessity and others were made for convenience; however, even with the assumptions and liberties taken, the results have relative significance and are related to other fats and oils properties that are important with respect to performance and use.7 3.3.2.2 Solids Fat Content The NMR technique distinguished hydrogen atoms in liquid and solid fats. In pulsed NMR, a measurement related to the total number of hydrogen atoms is followed by a second measurement 70 μsec later, which measures only those hydrogen atoms in a liquid environment. This determination depends on the fact that the transversal magnetization of hydrogen in a solid environment decays much more quickly (~10 sec) than that of hydrogen in a solid environment (~100 sec).8 Like the SFI by dilatometry, SFC by NMR involves assumptions and approximations: (1) it is assumed that the hydrogen density of a fat or triglyceride is identical to its mass, (2) the signal is measured after a delay of 10 μsec requiring an extrapolation factor to
Fats and Oils Analysis
205
70 60
Results
50 40 30 20 10 0
10°C
15°C
SFI-All-Purpose
20°C
25°C Temperature
SFC-All-Purpose
30°C SFC-Frying
35°C
40°C SFI-Frying
Figure 3.1 Comparison of SFI and SFC curves.
convert the signal to its zero-time factor (this assumption may cause up to 2% error), and (3) the tempering step used for SFI determinations is not incorporated into the SFC international method and was eliminated in the 1999 revision to the AOCS SFC method Cd 16-81.1 It has been determined experimentally that incorporation of the tempering step at 26.7°C improved the precision of the results.9 The usual temperatures chosen for the SFI determinations are 10.0, 21.1, 26.7, 33.3, and 37.8, or 40.0°C. SFC determinations have tended to be at 10.0, 15.0, 20.0, 25.0, 30.0, 35, and 40.0°C. The SFI temperatures were chosen to relate to the physical characteristics of the fat or oil product over the temperature range in use.5 For example, SFI results for margarine oils are usually determined at three temperatures to indicate properties for: • 10.0°C or 50°F: Indicates printability and product spreadability at refrigerator temperatures. • 21.1°C or 70°F: Indicates margarine or spread resistance to oil-off at room temperature. • 33.3°C or 92°F: Indicates eating or melt-in-the-mouth characteristics.
Figure 3.1 compares SFI and SFC analysis curves plotted for an all-purpose and a heavy duty frying shortening.10 SFC values are generally higher than the SFI values but seem to equate at approximately 25°C. The differences in values make SFC curves steeper than those for SFI, but either SFI or SFC slopes indicate the differences in a product’s consistency. The slope of the solids analysis curves can indicate the following consistency trends: • Flat solids curve: Flatter solids slopes generally have a greater plastic range because the solids remain within the plastic range for a wider temperature range.
206
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
• Steep solids curve: Sharp melting properties are usually accompanied by a high oxidative stability and characterized by a steep slope. Frying, cookie filler, table spread, and nondairy applications are examples of products benefiting from a steep solids slope. These products require a sharp melting profile with good flavor stability when workability and creaming properties are not required. • Plastic range: Fats and oils products generally have the best consistency for mixing and working within a SFI range of 15 to 25, which is usually identified as the plastic range. • Melting point: The dilatometric melting point is the temperature at which the SFI curve meets the liquid line, that is, the lowest temperature at which the SFI content is zero. This melting point is obtained by extrapolating the solids curve to zero either graphically or mathematically.
3.3.2.3 Differential Scanning Calorimetry Fat Solids Content Measurement of the heat of fusion of fat rather than its thermal expansion appeared to offer promise as a means of determining fat solids content, so methods were developed for measurement of the solids contents of vegetable and animal fats by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) in the search for a less time-consuming method for determining fat solids content. Briefly, the methods developed measured the heat of fusion of a frozen, completely solid sample of fat. The area under the melting curve (presented on a strip chart) is measured, then selected partial areas are measured as a percentage of the whole. The temperatures selected for partial area measurement are normally those used for the SFI by dilatometry.11 Several advantages can be identified for DSC fat solids methods as compared to SFI: (1) the thermal history determined can provide clues to the tempering and storage conditions for the fat sample; (2) the fat melt curve can help distinguish between two fat products with identical SFI values; (3) a fat solids range from –10°C for soft oils to 70°C for hardfats would be possible; (4) no limit for hardness would be necessary, as is required with SFI by dilatometry; (5) results should be available in approximately one hour of elapsed time; and (6) correlation with SFI results appear good. The identified disadvantages were (1) accurately weighing the small sample size (5 to 10 milligrams) poses the problem of representative sampling, (2) variation for fat solids is not constant and is greater at low temperatures,12 and (3) precision has been found to be poorer than with the standard SFI dilatometric technique. Fat solids analysis by DSC has never been accepted as a quality control tool to replace SFI. Originally, it had appeared to be an ideal choice because it measured the change in heat absorption versus the temperature of the sample programmed from one temperature to another to record a melting profile of a sample as it passes through various crystalline states from a solid to a liquid. The primary points of dissatisfaction with the DSC solids measurement techniques were the fact that reanalysis of the same sample is not as reproducible as SFI, the sample minute quantity requires significant weighing accuracy, and DSC provides too much information.3 It appears that DSC can be a very useful research tool, but it is not suitable for quality control laboratories.
Fats and Oils Analysis
207
3.3.3 Solidification Analysis Solidification of mixed fatty acids is the point at which a balance is attained between the heat generated and the heat lost that will vary according to the rate of crystallization and the degree of supercooling in the liquid. These evaluations are some of the oldest fat characteristics used for fats and oils control purposes. 3.3.3.1 Titer The titer test (AOCS Method Cc 12-59) measures the solidification point of the fatty acids. First, a fat sample must be saponified and dried before determining titer. Then, a titer tube is filled to the 57-millimeter mark with dried fatty acids and suspended in an air bath, which is surrounded by a water bath at 15 to 20°C below the expected titer result. The sample is stirred until the temperature begins to rise or remains constant for 30 seconds, after which the stirring is stopped and the endpoint is recorded as the maximum temperature the fat reaches with heat of crystallization.1 Titer is an important characteristic for inedible fats used for soap making or as a raw material for fatty acid manufacture. For edible fats and oils, titer is commonly specified for low-iodine-value hardfats, sometimes referred to as titer stocks. 3.3.3.2 Quick Titer Hydrogenation control of hardstocks or titer stocks is normally done with a quick titer determination because the official titer (AOCS Method Cc 12-59) is too time consuming for control purposes. A quick titer analysis is performed by dipping the bulb of a glass thermometer into the liquid fat sample and then rotating the thermometer stem between the fingers to cool the fat at room temperature. The endpoint is the temperature reading when the fat on the bulb clouds. Constants for each oil source have been identified for addition to the quick titer result that approximate the official titer determinations very closely:13 Source Fat or Oil
Quick Titer Constant, °C
Cottonseed oil
11.0
Soybean oil
13.0
Peanut oil
14.0
Palm oil
9.0
Lard
11.0
Tallow
12.0
3.3.3.3 Congeal Point This solidification method, sometimes referred to as setting point, is a measure of the fat itself rather than the separated fatty acids for titer. The congeal point (AOCS Method Cc 14-59) is determined by cooling a melted sample while stirring
208
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
until the fat becomes cloudy. The sample is then allowed to remain quietly in the air at 68°F. Under these conditions, a temperature rise occurs. The highest temperature attained is the congeal point, which is an estimate of the solidification temperature of the fat.5 3.3.3.4 Cloud Point This nonstandard method is a variation of the congeal procedure. An empirical cloud point is obtained by stirring a sample of fat while it is being cooled until the oil has clouded enough to block a light beam of known intensity. The cloud or congeal point values are more closely related to consistency than melting points. A definite relationship exists between SFI at 92°F (33.3°C) and the congeal or cloud point, especially for meat fats. 3.3.3.5 Cold Test The ability of a salad oil to withstand refrigerator storage is determined by the cold test, which measures the ability of an oil to resist crystallization by determining the time (in hours) required for the oil to become cloudy at 0°C (32°F). For the standardized AOCS Method Cc 11-53, dry-filtered oil is placed in a sealed 4-ounce bottle and submerged into an ice bath. The AOCS method stipulates that the oil should be examined after 5 and a half hours for clarity to determine if the oil passes or fails. An alternative to the method allows continuation of the cold test until a cloud develops.1 The alternative procedure is probably the norm, as most salad oil specifications require at least a 10-hour minimum cold test. The cold test was developed to evaluate cottonseed oil for the production of mayonnaise and salad dressing. An oil that will solidify at the refrigerator temperatures used for the preparation of these products will cause an emulsion break and separation. Currently, the cold test is also utilized to ensure that bottled salad oils for retail sale will not develop an unattractive appearance on the grocery shelf. 3.3.3.6 Chill Test Natural winter oils with soluble waxes can at times successfully pass an extended cold test but develop a cloudy appearance on the grocery store shelf. A nonstandard chill test has successfully predicted this problem when the cold test failed to do so. For the chill test, dry-filtered oil is placed in a sealed 4-ounce bottle and held at 70°F (21.1°C) and examined after 24 hours for clarity. Any indication of a cloud or wisp indicates the presence of a wax or hard oil contamination. 3.3.4 Consistency Analysis Consistency is generally assumed to be a combination of those effects that tend to give the impression of resistance. Plasticity relates to the capacity of the product to be molded. The factor most directly and obviously influencing the consistency of
Fats and Oils Analysis
209
a fat is the proportion of the material in the solid phase. It is well established that a fat becomes firmer as the solids content increases. Crystal size also has an effect — the smaller the crystals, the firmer the fat. An example is the fact that grainy lards are softer than smooth lards that have been interesterified. Persistence of the crystal nuclei is also a factor. As a fat is exposed to temperature fluctuations, a portion of it undergoes melting and resolidification. The ability of certain fats to retain their original crystal form, regardless of temperature variation, is probably due to their capability to leave behind crystal nuclei that serve as starting points for the development of new crystals when the fat is cooled.14 Some of the most critical performance factors of fats and oils products are related to the properties commonly referred to as consistency and plasticity. The quality of butter, margarine, and spreads depends on the consistency of the fat portion and its ability to be spread on bread. A wide plastic range and a smooth consistency are mandatory for roll-in shortenings and margarines used for thin-layer lamination at refrigerator temperatures. Plasticity is also important for the workability and creaming properties required for shortenings used in the preparation of icings and aerated batters. Two measures are used: 3.3.4.1 Consistency Ratings Undoubtedly, the first method used for evaluating the consistency of a fats and oils product was to press a finger into the product or working the product in the hand. These rating methods, although very subjective, are still applicable and effective. An experienced evaluator can identify slight differences or imperfections in the finished product more readily than can available instrumentation in regard to body, firmness, softness, and inconsistencies in the feel (e.g., sandiness, lumps, ribby texture), as well as problems with the appearance (e.g., oiling, air pockets, grainy texture). Methods for applying a numerical value to the finished product evaluations have been developed independently by most edible fats and oils processors or laboratories for comparison purposes. Suggested methods for shortening and margarine finished product rating are presented in the nonstandardized methods section. 3.3.4.2 Penetrations The most widely used method to measure consistency of a plasticized shortening or margarine involves the ASTM grease penetrometer or an adaptation of it. AOCS Method Cc 16-60 for penetration testing identifies the penetrometer as a mechanical device with a support to grip and release the shaft and cone, a support for the sample, an adjustment capability to level the device, and a gauge graduated in 0.1-millimeter units that conforms to ASTM D5, D217, and D937 designations. Most variations of the method used by different laboratories involve the design of the needle or cone. Penetration evaluations measure the depth to which the cone penetrates into the surface of the shortening or margarine after allowing the cone to settle into the product for five seconds, starting from a position where the tip of the cone just touches the
210
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
surface of the sample. The penetration result for each product is the average of four readings performed at each evaluation temperature. Penetration results are utilized internally for the most part and are not normally a part of customer specifications for fats and oils products. Nevertheless, uniform procedures must be observed to obtain reproducible results. To avoid overheating or overcooling, evaluation samples must be carefully tempered until the desired product temperatures are achieved, usually 24 hours for 1-pound containers. The sample temperature should be stabilized to within 1.0°C before testing for reproducible results. Temperature abuse at any time can change the penetration results even if the sample temperature is returned to the desired level and especially if the sample has experienced any actual melting. Consistency of a product must be measured at a number of different temperatures to determine its plastic range, that is, the range of temperatures over which the fat has the capability of being molded or worked. Normally, samples are held at three to five different temperatures, ranging from 40 to 100°F (4.4 to 37.8°C), until each sample has equilibrated at the desired temperature. The samples are evaluated to determine the relative softness at low temperature and firmness at high temperature. Products with a wide plastic range are workable at both high and low temperatures. A perfect plastic range, if it could exist, would have the same penetration at all temperatures. Evaluation of penetration data, obtained personally, indicated that the penetration plastic range falls between 150 and 300 mm/10 g. Although the elapsed time required for penetration results is too lengthy for process control, it is a valuable tool for finished products control and product development. A penetration curve can confirm that the desired plasticization and tempering conditions have been achieved for an individual product when the SFI and blend composition are controlled within specified limits. Figure 3.2 illustrates the effect of varied chilling unit temperatures upon consistency of soybean oil hydrogenated basestock as measured by penetrations. The results illustrate the softening effect of cooler chilling unit operating temperatures and that the finished product consistency can be predicted from the solids fat content when the plasticization and tempering conditions are controlled.
3.4 COMPOSITION ANALYSIS Knowledge of the composition of fats and oils is very important in nearly every phase of fats chemistry and technology, although often its importance is not fully realized. In fact, progress in the utilization of commercial fats and oils as raw materials in the manufacture of useful products is dependent to a large degree on knowledge of the composition of the starting material and the products derived from it. Methods for determining the fats and oils composition are important not only because of the fatty acid contents and the pattern of glyceride distribution elaborated by plants and animals, but also because the physical character and end-use performance of fats and oils are directly related to composition.
Fats and Oils Analysis
211
500 450 400 Penetrations
350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0
10
15
20
25
30
Solids Fat Index 45°F Chilling
55°F Chilling
65°F Chilling
Figure 3.2 Effect of varied chilling temperatures.
Analytical methods for determining compositions of fats and oils have evolved from chemical separations to instrumental procedures. Instrumental methods are attractive to the analytical chemist because of the time-saving, better accuracy, and less tedious features; however, most instrumental analysis must rely on a standardization or calibration procedure, usually the original wet chemical analysis. 3.4.1 Saponification Value Saponification value, a measure of the alkali-reactive groups in fats and oils, was used to predict the type of glycerides in a sample. Glycerides containing short-chain fatty acids have higher saponification values than those with longer chain fatty acids. The saponification value, along with the iodine value determination, were useful screening tests both for quality control and for characterizing types of fats and oils. However, the results overlap too much to identify individual fats or oils; for example, both domestic vegetable oils and animal fats have saponification values in the 180 to 200 range. Saponification value analysis has been replaced almost exclusively in edible fats and oils processing by fatty acid composition analysis by gas/liquid chromatography (GLC), except that some purchasers may specify it to prevent lauric oil contamination of domestic oils. Lauric oils have saponification values in the range of 240 to 265, which differ substantially from the 180 to 200 range for domestic vegetable oils. 3.4.2 Iodine Value The iodine value is a chemical constant for a fat or oil. It is a valuable characteristic in fat analysis that measures unsaturation, but does not define the specific fatty
212
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
acids. Iodine value analyses are very accurate and provide nearly theoretical values, except in the case of conjugated double bonds or when the double bond is near a carboxyl group. However, unless the history of the fat or the type of fat in the product is known, an iodine value may be somewhat meaningless by itself. For example, a product prepared with a meat fat with consistency and performance characteristics similar to a vegetable oil-based product will have a considerably different iodine value. Further, even vegetable oil products with comparable functionality, but different source oils will not have like iodine values. Iodine value is a useful tool for process control and product specification. Iodine value is a measure of the unsaturation of fats and oils and is expressed as the number of centigrams of iodine absorbed per gram of sample. Determination of the iodine value (AOCS Method Cd 1-25) is carried out by adding an excess of Wijs reagent to the sample, allowing the mixture to react for 30 minutes at 25°C (± 5°C), treating the excess reagent with potassium iodide to convert it to equivalent iodine, and titrating with thiosulfate reagent and a starch indicator until the blue color disappears.1 The Wijs iodine value procedure must be performed very precisely and timed carefully to be reproducible. Although many different iodine value procedures have been developed, the Wijs method is still widely used as a standard method. Some major drawbacks of this wet chemistry procedure are the use of iodine tricholoride (Wijs reagent) and the timeconsuming procedures for reagent preparation and the actual analysis. Numerous efforts have been made to reduce the use of health dangerous chemicals and analysis time requirements. A Fourier transform-near infrared (FT-NIR) spectroscopy procedure, with a sample handling system using disposable vials, reduces sample turnaround time to less than two minutes and eliminates the expense and unhealthy solvent use.15 The FT-NIR analysis can simultaneously determine iodine value, cis and trans fatty acid content, and saponification number of an edible oil.16 FT-NIR spectroscopy methods have also been applied to detection of adulteration, classification of oils, peroxide value, anisidine value, FFA, and phospholipids.17 Techniques for iodine value determination have also been developed using differential scanning calorimetry and the fatty acid composition.18 3.4.3 Refractive Index Refractive index is a basic value that relates to molecular weight, fatty acid, chain length, degree of unsaturation, and degree of conjugation. Refractive index is the degree of deflection of a beam of light that occurs when it passes from one transparent medium to another. A refractometer with temperature control is used for fats and oils with measurement usually at 25°C. A mathematical relationship between refractive index and iodine value was proposed by Zeleny, et al.:19,20
Refractive Index at 25°C = 1.45765 + 0.0001164 × Iodine Value
High-melting fats require temperature adjustments to 40 or 60°C, depending on the melting point of the product. Temperature changes affect the results obtained; refractive index decreases as the temperature rises, but, at the same time, increases
Fats and Oils Analysis
213
with the length of the carbon chains and with the number of double bonds present in the fatty acids. The temperature correction to refractive index has been determined to be an increase of 0.000385 for each degree (°C) rise in temperature.21 AOCS Method Cc 7-25 identifies the procedure used to measure the refractive index for fats and oils.1 A reverse relationship, used to calculate the iodine value when the RI is known, is22
Iodine Value = 8661.723 × Refractive Index at 25°C – 12,626.174
Refractive index is used as a rapid control for the determination of the product endpoint for hydrogenation reactions. One source of error in the iodine value calculation for hydrogenated basestocks is that trans fatty acids formed during hydrogenation affect the refractive index, but not the iodine value. 3.4.4 Fatty Acid Composition Prior to the gas liquid chromatograph (GLC) development identification of fats and oils was limited to a combination of iodine value, relative density, refractive index, and saponification value. The GLC fatty acid composition analysis provides a rapid accurate means of determining the fatty acid distribution of fats and oils products. This information is beneficial for all aspects of product development, process control, and marketing because the physical, chemical, and nutritional characteristics of fats and oils are influenced by the kinds and proportions of the component fatty acids and their position on the glycerol radical. The fatty acid composition results provides a large quantity of information with one analysis, such as: identification of individual fatty acids and quantities, saturate/unsaturate levels (calculated iodine value), identification of the unsaturated fatty acid isomers (cis, trans, conjugated, positional), provides the data to determine the source oil proportions and processing of a blended product, and it applies equally well to refined and unrefined oils. Gas chromatography includes those chromatograph techniques in which the mobile phase is a moving gas. In general, the procedure involves passing the methyl ester, or transesterified triglycerides, to be analyzed through a heated column by means of a carrier gas such as helium or nitrogen. The components of the mixture are eluted with the gas and detected and measured at the exit end of the column by a suitable means. The retention time is the time required for a given compound to pass through the column. The fatty acid esters exit in the order of saturation. The retention time is indicated on the horizontal axis of the chart and is a qualitative index of the substance, and the area under the curve is in each case a quantitative measure of the component. Recent GLC methods require long capillary columns with high polar stationary phases to determine fatty acid content. Separation of the fatty acids is based on chain length, degree of saturation, as well as the geometry and position of the double bonds. The expected elution sequence for fatty acids with the same chain length is: saturated, monounsaturated, disaturated, etc. Trans positional isomers are followed by cis positional isomers with extensive over lap of the geometric isomers.23
214
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
The U.S. Nutritional Labeling and Education Act define total fat content as the sum of all fatty acids, calculated as triglycerides per 100 grams of product. This requirement necessitates the use of an internal standard. Evaluation of a number of fatty acids prepared as internal standards indicated that C-13:0 was preferred because it showed the least interactions with the sample fatty acid profile.24 Both the AOAC method 996.06, appropriate for determination of fat in food products and AOCS Ce 1f-96, applicable to the determination of cis and trans fatty acids in fats and oils recommend glycerotride-canoate (C-13:0) as an internal standard.23 Fourier transform-near infrared spectroscopy (FT-NIR) methods for trans fatty acid composition determinations are also approved by AOCS and AOAC International. Analytical laboratories have preferred the GLC methods because they provide a profile of all the fatty acids including trans isomers. The FT-NIR method only provides the total trans fatty acids. However, a technique has been developed that reportedly combines the speed of FT-NIR with the specificity and accuracy of GLC determinations to obtain a complete fat or oil fatty acid profile. U.S. Patent Application No. 10/840277 was submitted in May 2004 for the FT-NIR technology.25 3.4.5 Calculated Iodine Value Iodine value measures unsaturates or the average number of double bonds in a fat; therefore, it is logical that an iodine value can be easily calculated from a fatty acid composition analysis. The constants for the most common unsaturated fatty acids required for calculation of a triglyceride iodine value are shown below:26 Unsaturated Fatty Acid Constants Fatty Acid
Constant
Fatty Acid
Constant
C-10:1 Decenoic
1.388
C-16:3 Hexadecatrienoic
C-12:1 Lauroleic
1.203
C-18:3 Linolenic
2.895 2.616
C-14:1 Myristoleic
1.062
C-20:3 Dihomo-γ-linolenic
2.386
C-15:1 Pentadecanoic
1.002
C-22:3
2.194
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
0.950
C-17:1 Margaroleic
0.903
C-16:4Hexadecatetraenoic
3.888
C-18:1 Oleic
0.860
C-18:4 Stearidonic
3.512
C-20:1 Gadoleic
0.785
C-20:4 Arachidonic
3.202
C-22:1 Erucic
0.723
C-22.4 Docosatetraenoic
2.943
C-24:1 Nervonic
0.669
C-20:5 EPA
4.028
C-12:2
2.427
C-21:5 Henicosapentaenoic
3.855
C-14:2
2.141
C-22:5 Clupanodonic
3.699
C-16:2 Hexadecadienoic
1.915
C-24:5 Tetracosapentaenoic
3.419
C-17:2
1.756
C-18:2 Linoleic
1.732
C-20:6
4.864
C-20:2 Eicosadienoic
1.581
C-22:6 DHA
4.464
C-22:2 Docosadienoic
1.454
C-24:6 Tetracosahexaenoic
4.125
Fats and Oils Analysis
215
The calculated iodine value is determined simply by multiplying the percentage of each unsaturated fatty acid by its constant and addition of the results. This procedure has not replaced the regular iodine value. It can be utilized as an audit for the chemical iodine value and does provide the capability of obtaining two results from one analysis. 3.4.6 Glyceride Structure The chemical, physical, and biological properties of fats and oils depend not only on the kind and quantity of participating fatty acids, but also on the positions of these fatty acids in the triglyceride molecule. In general, fats and oils are composed of mixed glycerides rather than mixtures of simple glycerides. When all three fatty acids are identical, the product is a simple triglyceride. A mixed triglyceride has two or three different fatty acids joined to the glycerol. The characteristics of a triglyceride depend on the position that each fatty acid occupies on the glycerin molecule. As a general rule, fats with uniform triglyceride molecules have β-crystals in the most stable state. Fats that are stable in the β′-crystal form contain mixtures of types of triglycerides that prevent large growth. For example, fully hydrogenated soybean, corn, canola, and peanut oils are essentially all tristearin due to a low level of palmitic fatty acid and form stable β-crystals. Cottonseed and palm oils with high palmitic fatty acid levels have mixtures of stearic and palmitic fatty acids when fully hydrogenated, which form β′-crystals. Lard and cocoa butter have high palmitic fatty acid levels, but crystallize in the β form due to the uniform triglyceride structure. For lard, palmitic fatty acid is always found in the sn-2 position of the glycerin molecule, and cocoa butter always has oleic fatty acid in the sn-2 position.27 Analysis of the complex mixtures of triglycerides present in natural fats has been carried out by many methods. Early analytical techniques employing crystallization and counter-current distribution were not reproducible and required large samples and long analysis times. Extensive evaluations of chromatography techniques have led to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), which partially fulfills the ideal requirements of an accurate, quick, and easy analytical procedure. HPLC procedures have provided rapid methods for the determination of relative amounts of glycerides present in a fat. HPLC can be used to monitor the modification of a fat, as well as to detect adulteration, and as a developmental tool for specialty fats and oils. It appears that triglyceride structure analyses can be very useful research and development tools, but are not practical for quality control purposes. 3.4.7 Emulsifier Analysis A rapid, precise, and easily reproducible method for the determination of monoglyceride in fats became an essential requirement from a quality control standpoint when the use of monoglyceride in shortening and margarine blends became widespread. Hydroxyl number determinations, interfacial tension measurement, and alcohol extractions, among other procedures, were investigated and found not specific and sensitive enough or suitable for quality control purposes. The most satisfactory
216
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
method identified for determining monoglyceride and free glycerin was based upon their quantitative oxidation with periodic acid. AOCS Method Cd 1157 for α-monoglyceride presents this titration analysis, where the amount of monoglyceride or glycerin is determined by measuring the amount of periodic acid consumed. Free glycerin can also be determined by titration of the formic acid produced.1 Several other analytical procedures for monoglyceride based on thin-layer chromatography (TLC), GLC, and HPLC have been developed as substitutes for the periodic acid oxidation method. These procedures provide reproducible results comparable to or better than the periodic acid oxidation method and are fast and easy to perform; however, the total monoglyceride values usually average higher than the titration method. Monoglyceride exist in two isomeric forms: the 2 form and the 1 form. Only the latter responds to periodic oxidation, which is the basic reaction in the normally applied chemical reaction of α-monoglyceride contents.28,29 The chromatographic procedures are also applicable for determination of other emulsifier types, notably acetylated monoglyceride and propylene glycol esters. 3.4.8 Antioxidant Analysis Antioxidants are widely used in fats and oils products to delay decomposition processes that result in offensive flavors. Several phenolic compounds have been identified that inhibit oxidation of fats and oils by interrupting the free-radical mechanism of oxidation. The most notable synthetic antioxidants are propyl gallate (PG), butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), and tertiary butylhydroquinone (TBHQ). The FDA permits the use of the antioxidants at a maximum level of 200 ppm singly or in combination by weight in the vegetable oil portion of the food except when prohibited by a Standard of Identity. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) limits the antioxidant use to 100 ppm singly, but allows 200 ppm in combination with no single antioxidant exceeding 100 ppm for meat fat products. Both the USDA and the FDA labeling requirements specify that the antioxidant utilized must be listed in the ingredient statement. These requirements plus the beneficial effect of the antioxidants necessitate good analytical control of their additions. Both qualitative and quantitative analytical methods are available for evaluation of the fats and oils products for the presence of the various phenolic antioxidants: • Qualitative methods: Rapid color endpoint qualitative process control procedures are available for the detection of PG, BHA, BHT, and TBHQ. These evaluations indicate only the absence or presence of the particular antioxidant in the fat or oil product. • Quantitative methods: HPLC and GLC methods are currently utilized to measure the amounts of PG, BHA, BHT, and TBHQ antioxidants in a fats or oils product. These procedures require less than an hour to provide accurate and reproducible results.
3.4.9 Tocopherol Analysis Vegetable oils contain tocopherols, which are natural antioxidants that retard oxidative rancidity. The tocopherol content decreases during each step of processing
Fats and Oils Analysis
217
and can be markedly reduced during deodorization, as these compounds are volatile under these conditions. Studies have shown that the deodorizer tocopherol loss can vary from 19.8 to 51.2% depending on the deodorizer conditions utilized.30 The amount of tocopherols removed from the oil during deodorization depends on the time, temperature, and stripping steam flow used. It is important that high proportions of the tocopherols survive oil processing to provide optimum oxidation stability. The alternative is the addition of synthetic antioxidants or tocopherols that have been extracted from deodorizer distillate of vegetable oils. Several methods have been developed for tocopherol analysis of the vegetable oils and in deodorizer distillates and soybean oil sludge and residues. The instrumentation and procedures evaluated have involved colorimeters, paper chromatography (PC), TLC, column chromatography (CC), GLC, GLC/mass spectrometry (GLC/MS), and HPLC separation techniques, all of which are also sometimes used in combination. Four different AOCS methods have been standardized for tocopherol determinations for the use of these laboratory instruments; Ce 3-74, Ce 7-87, Ce 8-89, and Ja 13-91.1 Oxidative stability, or lack of it, in the finished fats and oils product may be due to an abnormal reduction of the tocopherols, which act as free-radical, chainbreaking antioxidants. Tocopherol analysis of deodorized vegetable oil products or deodorizer distillate can indicate or provide a reason for a stability problem. 3.5 FLAVOR, RANCIDITY, AND STABILITY Consumers use organoleptic evaluations to judge the quality of fats and oils every time they eat a prepared food product. Organoleptic evaluation of oil products has long been recognized as the most sensitive method of assessing quality, but it is also recognized that these evaluations generally lack precision and reproducibility. Rancidity is considered to be the objectionable flavor that results from the accumulation of decomposition products of either oxidation or hydrolysis reactions. In the development, evaluation, and quality control of edible fats and oils, resistance of the products to oxidative and hydrolytic deterioration is of prime importance. Many chemical methods have been developed to measure oxidative deterioration with the objective of correlating the data with flavor characteristics. Various levels of acceptability have resulted from these endeavors, but researchers are still seeking the ideal test; however, experience has shown that when suitable flavor testing methods are employed, the chemical methods become more valuable in assessing the quality as an oil product. 3.5.1 Flavor Analysis Flavor in foods is a combined result of the senses of taste, smell, touch, and hearing. Taste and smell sensations result from contact stimuli, where the stimulating substances must be placed upon the receptive sensory cells. The taste-sensing organs, called taste buds, are grouped together on the tongue and to a lesser extent on the palate, pharynx,
218
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
and larynx.31 Experts now believe that taste has six attributes: sweet, sour, salt, bitter, umami (protein-rich foods taste), and fat. Previously, the general consensus was that fat had not taste, but now tests have shown that taste buds can detect fat. It is suspected that an insensitive receptor may cause some individuals to consume high quantities of fatty acids.32 It has been determined that the human receptors respond to most of the flavor attributes. Obviously, such complex taste stimuli cannot be identified with analyses that measure only one aspect; in addition, flavor identity is further complicated by the presence of other substances that block some sensations.33 3.5.1.1 Sensory Evaluations Taste assessment is the ultimate method of grading finished oil quality. To determine oil flavor, 5 to 10 milliliters of oil is taken into the mouth, thoroughly swished throughout the mouth with air drawn over the top, and expectorated into a waste cup.34 A panel of experienced tasters rates the flavor of the oil according to an established intensity scale. Typically, a 10-point scoring system is used, and panel members assign a grade representative of the flavor intensity (somewhat similar to that shown in Table 3.1), from which a mean flavor score is determined. The flavor intensity scores of a trained flavor panel should agree within plus or minus one unit. Off-flavors are described with descriptive names such as green, grassy, weedy, fruity, beany, watermelony, nutty, raw, painty, musty, metallic, oxidized, buttery, reverted, fishy, rancid, tallowy, and so on. Agreement among untrained flavorists regarding off-flavor descriptions is often poor due to individual preferences, age, and background.35 Organoleptic, or taste, evaluation will always be necessary and probably will remain the most important technique in flavor evaluation. Taste panels for edible-oil evaluations are utilized for several purposes: (1) to serve as a research or developmental tool, (2) to determine consumer acceptance, and (3) to evaluate process quality. The selection of panel members for each application can be different. Consumer panels are usually a random selection of people who constitute the targeted market, whereas research and development evaluations require trained panelists capable of Table 3.1 Fats and Oils Flavor Grading Scale Rating
Grade
Best
10
Bland
Completely band — no flavor detected
9
Trace
Hint of flavor but too weak to identify
8
Faint
Typical of freshly deodorized oil
7
Slight
Identifiable flavor but just barely
6
Mild
Mildly raw, oxidized or reverted
5
Moderate
Moderately raw, oxidized or reverted
4
Definite
Definitely raw, oxidized or reverted
3
Strong
Strongly raw, oxidized or reverted
2
Intense
Intensely objectionable flavor
1
Extreme
Rancid
Worst
Intensity
Flavor Description
Fats and Oils Analysis
219
finite discrimination among various oil flavors and intensities. Process quality evaluators must be able to distinguish between a bland or acceptable flavor and an offflavor. AOCS Method Cg 2-83 provides a standardized technique for the sensory evaluation of edible fats and oils that encompasses standard sample preparation, presentation of samples, and reporting of sensory responses.1 3.5.1.2 Volatile Flavor Analysis Even though sensory evaluation is the most important and common way to determine fats and oils quality, the method is time consuming, tedious, expensive, variable among panel members, and not always available. Advancements in food science analytical instruments have stimulated researchers to work toward development of methods for the evaluation of sensory qualities of fats and oils. The AOCS Flavor Nomenclature and Standard committee studied the objective methods that could complement subjective organoleptic evaluations of oils and found good correlation between actual sensory scores and predicted results by a GLC procedure. The scientific validity of the correlation coefficients and whether GLC analysis performed by one laboratory would correlate with sensory scores obtained at other laboratories was questioned by some scientists. Further evaluations by 94 panel members from eight different laboratories utilizing the same instrumental GLC analysis produced results equivalent to those for panel members from one specific laboratory.36 The correlation of oil volatiles with flavor scores of edible oils became an AOCS Recommended Practice, Cg 1-83, and eventually a standardized method.1 3.5.2 Rancidity Analysis Detection of advanced stages of rancidity in a fat or fatty food has never been a problem for people with normal olfactory senses. The sharp pungent odors mixed with stale and musty odors provide the telltale evidence of rancidity. The major causes of these off-flavors are oxidation and hydrolysis. Factors, such as temperature, light, moisture, metals, and oxygen, contribute to the formation of off-flavors. Preferences for fats and oils products with fresh bland flavors and odors require keeping qualities and incipient rancidity evaluations both during development and as processed. 3.5.2.1 Peroxide Value Oxidation of lipids is a major cause of their deterioration, and hydroperoxides formed by the reaction between oxygen and the unsaturated fatty acids are the primary products of this reaction. Hydroperoxides have no flavor or odor but break down rapidly to form aldehydes, which have a strong, disagreeable flavor and odor. The peroxide concentration, usually expressed as peroxide value, is a measure of oxidation or rancidity in its early stages. Peroxide value (PV) measures the concentration of substances (in terms of milliequivalents of peroxide per 1000 grams of sample) that oxidize potassium iodide to iodine. The iodometric AOCS Method Cd 8-531 is highly empirical, and any variation in procedure may cause a variation of results. Therefore, it is necessary
220
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
to control temperature, sample weight, and the amount, type, and grade of reagents, as well as the time of contact. It has also been observed that the standardized method has difficulties in identifying the titration endpoint for low PV levels and is inadequate for products such as phosphatides that develop emulsions.37 Peroxide value is one of the most widely used chemical tests for the determination of fats and oils quality. PV has shown good correlation with organoleptic flavor scores. For soybean oil, a PV of 1.0 or less indicates freshness; 1 to 5 PV, low oxidation; 5 to 10 PV, moderate oxidation; >10 PV, high oxidation; and >20 PV, poor flavor. These quality estimates are specific for soybean oil, and higher or lower PVs may be acceptable for other oils.34 Still, a peroxide determination does not provide a full and unqualified evaluation of fats and oils flavor because of the transitory nature of peroxides and their breakdown to nonperoxide materials. Although a linear relationship has been observed between peroxide values and flavor scores during the initial stages of lipid oxidation, this method alone is not an infallible flavor indicator because the peroxide value increases to a maximum and then decreases as storage time increases. Therefore, high peroxide values usually mean poor flavor ratings, but a low peroxide value is not always an indication of a good flavor. 3.5.2.2 Anisidine Value The anisidine value measures the amount of α and β unsaturated aldehydes present in the oil. The method is based on the fact that in the presence of acetic acid, p-anisidine reacts with the aldehydic compounds in an oil, producing yellowish reaction products. The color intensity depends not only on the amount of aldehydic compounds present, but also on their structure. Thus, it has been found that the double bond in the carbon chain conjugated to the carbonyl double bond enhances the molar absorbance at 350 nanometers by a factor of 4 or 5.38 Anisidine value is a measure of secondary oxidation, or the history of an oil, and therefore is useful in determining the quality of crude oils and the efficiency of processing procedures, but it is not suitable for the detection of fat oxidation. Anisidine values below 2 to 3% after deodorization are indicative of good oil stability.39 AOCS Method Cd 18-90 has been standardized for anisidine value analysis.1 3.5.2.3 Free Fatty Acid and Acid Value Hydrolytic rancidity occurs as a result of a splitting of the triglyceride molecule at the ester linkage with the formation of free fatty acid (FFA), which can contribute objectionable odor, flavor, and other characteristics. The flavors resulting from FFA development depend on the composition of the fat. Release of short-chain fatty acids, such as butyric, caproic, and capric acid, cause particularly disagreeable odors and flavors, whereas the long-chain fatty acids (C-12 and above) produce candlelike or, at alkaline pH, soapy flavors.38 Both acid value and FFA are measures of the free fatty acid content of fats and oils. Acid value is the amount of potassium hydroxide required for neutralization, whereas FFA utilizes sodium hydroxide for neutralization. FFA results may be expressed in terms of acid value by multiplying the FFA
Fats and Oils Analysis
221
percent by 1.99. FFA is calculated as free oleic acid on a percentage basis for most fats and oils sources, although for coconut and palm kernel oils it is usually calculated as lauric acid and for palm oil as palmitic acid. The standard AOCS method for free fatty acid is Ca 5a-40, and for acid value it is Cd 3a-63.1 Free fatty acid is an important fat quality indicator during each stage of fats and oils processing. It is a measure of deodorizer efficiency and a process control tool for other processes. High FFA results for deodorized oils indicate a poor deodorizer vacuum, inadequate steam sparging, or air leaks if the product color is high with an oxidized oil flavor. The deodorized oil FFA level that has become standard in the United States is 0.05% maximum, but most internal standards require a 0.03% maximum. Crude vegetable oils may have abnormally high FFA levels if the seed has been field damaged or improperly stored. Seed and fruit enzyme lipases are activated by moisture, and hydrolysis is initiated, which increases the FFA content. Higher crude oil FFA levels equate to higher refining losses. Free fatty acid content monitoring during and after all processes, including storage, provides process control results that identify potential problems for which corrective actions can be initiated on a timely basis. FFA is the result of hydrolysis of the fat or oil. Moisture must be present for hydrolysis to develop. This reaction is accelerated with heat and pressure, as are most reactions. Free fatty acid titrations identify all acidic materials in the oil, which includes the acid added to chelate metals, acids leached from the bleaching earths, antioxidant acidity, emulsifiers added, and other acidic materials. Deodorization, the final process, must reduce the FFA content to a level that will still meet the specification requirements even when the required additives have high acidity levels. During deep-fat frying, FFA analyses are quality indicators that determine the amount of hydrolysis. FFA development results from the reaction of water and fats at frying temperature. The rate of hydrolysis development is due to the amount of moisture in the foods being fried and the frying temperature. 3.5.2.4 Smoke Point AOCS Method Cc 9a-48 measures the temperature at which smoking is first detected in a laboratory apparatus protected from drafts and equipped with special lighting.1 The temperature at which smoking will be observed with actual frying or heating situations will be somewhat higher. Smoke point depends primarily on the FFA content because the fatty acids are more volatile than triglycerides. Also, lower molecular weight fatty acids, as well as mono- and diglycerides, have less resistance to smoking. Initially, deodorized shortenings with α-monoglyceride contents of 0.4% or less and FFA contents of 0.05% or less should have about the same smoke point in the range of 400 to 450°F (204 to 232°C). 3.5.3 Stability Analysis Stability of a fat or oil is generally accepted as the storage life of the product until rancidity becomes apparent. Oxidative rancidity is usually the principal concern,
222
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
although other types of deterioration can occur simultaneously and make the problem more complex. For instance, hydrolytic rancidity is sometimes mistaken for oxidative flavor degradation, which can lead to ineffective preventive measures. In general, the methods for measuring fats and oils stability combine the measurement techniques for initial evaluations with the long-term effects of temperature, light, moisture, oxygen, and other abuses. Most fats and oils products are tested for flavor stability as a part of quality control programs to ensure that the customer specification limits are satisfied. The purpose of these evaluations is to confirm that the product will have a satisfactory shelf life and will not develop an off-flavor prior to incorporation in a finished product. A number of methods have been developed for evaluating the long-range stability of fats and oils products, the majority of which are based on subjecting a sample to conditions that attempt to accelerate the normal oxidation process; however, a direct correlation between the various evaluations is not possible because oxidation of a fat and oil product is a complex mechanism. Ideally, a test protocol could be selected for each product that simulates the end-use performance. End-use test procedures are practical for large volume products, but impractical for all purpose products. Therefore, accelerated testing procedures are utilized that attempt to determine an oil’s response to oxidative catalysts, antioxidants, and other contaminates under typical conditions. These evaluations must be conduced under accelerated conditions to provide a result that can be utilized for quality control. 3.5.3.1 Active Oxygen Method The active oxygen method (AOM) was the most commonly used method for evaluation of the oxidative stability of fats and oils products until it was declared surplus, effective 1996. This method, first introduced in 1933, has been the standard for routine quality control, as a research and development tool for new products, and as an oxidative stability trade standard for finished oil specifications. AOM employs heat and aeration to accelerate deterioration of a fat and oil sample to shorten the time required to reach the endpoint. Surplus AOCS Method Cd 12-57, AOM for Fat Stability, is performed by placing a 20-mL sample in a special aeration tube and the heating it in an oil bath or a heated block controlled at 97.8°C (± 0.2°C) (208 ± 0.4°F) with an air flow adjusted to 2.33 mL per tube per second. The sample is exposed to the elevated temperature and aeration until a predetermined PV is attained, usually 20 PV for animal fats and 70 or 100 PV for vegetable oil products. Improvements in the oxidative stability of fats and oils products required greater elapsed times to reach the AOM endpoint. A comprehensive study of temperature effects indicated that a time savings of 60% with a satisfactory correlation of AOM results could be obtained by increasing the heating block temperature to 110°C. The ratio of time required for the standard AOM to the accelerated procedure is 2.5:1.40 Both the standard and accelerated AOM analysis has several major disadvantages. First, the procedure involved is highly empirical, requiring close attention to detail if reproducible results are expected. The maximum expected variation in results between laboratories is ± 25% for a 100-hour AOM sample. Second, the AOM
Fats and Oils Analysis
223
evaluation is faster than normal aging methods; however, a 100-hour AOM sample will still require 4.2 days by the standard AOM or 1.7 days by the accelerated AOM to reach the expected endpoint. The relationship between product shelf life and AOM stability results varies with each fat and oil product and the processing it has received. It has been suggested that one AOM hour is equivalent to 15 days of shelf life; however, no overall correlation can be applied in all situations. None of the stability evaluations can be used as an index of shelf stability except when it is applied to a given type of fat and oil formulation for which a specific relationship has been established.41 3.5.3.2 Oil Stability Index A need for more rapid oxidative stability results prompted the development and introduction of two conductivity instruments, Rancimat and Oxidative Stability Instrument (OSI), as alternatives to the AOM method. AOCS initiated a collaborative study to investigate these instruments and methods as potential alternatives for the AOM method. As a result of the study, AOCS Method Cd 12b-92, Oil Stability Index became the official method in 1996.42 The OSI and Rancimat are automated instruments based on the conductimetric measurement method. The instruments measure the increase in deionized water conductivity resulting from trapped volatile oxidation products produced when the oil product is heated under a stream of air. The conductivity increase is related to the oxidative stability of the oil product. The evaluation procedure is performed by placing 2 grams of test oil into a sample tube that has been preheated to 110°C (230°F), connected on one side to the air source and on the other side to a 50-mL cell of deionized water. The conductance of the water is measured automatically over time with a strip chart recorder or data acquisition software. Normally, the oxidation curve indicates the induction period followed by a rapid rising response as the oxidation rate is accelerated.3 The endpoint for the regular AOM stability is specified as the time in hours required for the sample to reach a peroxide value of 100 meq/kg. The endpoint of this conductivity procedure is the time required for a sudden increase in formic acid production to occur at the end of the induction period.43 Good correlation has been found to exist between both of the instruments and AOM at various temperatures.42 3.5.3.3 Schaal Oven Test The Schaal oven test was developed by the biscuit and cracker industry to provide an age stability evaluation for shortenings. Because it is performed at temperatures only moderately warmer than those found in ordinary storage conditions, it provides an index of stability that more nearly represents a product under normal use conditions. The Schaal oven test is normally performed in a forced-draft oven at 63°C (145°F). The test sample is stored in beakers covered with a watch glass or in glass jars with loose-fitting caps. The product stability is measured as the number of days before rancidity is detected. The peroxide value can be used as an indicator of rancidity, but should only supplement organoleptic evaluations. A distinctive
224
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
feature of the Schaal oven tests of both fats and oils, plus fatty foods, is that flavors and odors other than oxidative rancidity can be revealed because it does not rely on very high temperatures to accelerate degradation. Also, a minimum of laboratory equipment is required to perform the evaluation. Schaal oven testing is principally a product development or audit evaluation due to the extended time periods required for completion. The relationship between product shelf life, Schaal oven, and AOM stability results varies with each fats and oils product and the processing it has received. It has been suggested that 1 AOM hour or 1 Schaal oven day is equivalent to 15 days of shelf life; however, no overall correlation can be applied in all situations. None of the stability evaluations can be used as an index of shelf stability except when it is applied to a given type of fat and oil formulation for which a specific relationship has been established.41 3.5.3.4 Pastry Flavor Test The effects of unsaturation, prooxidants, antioxidants, oxygen, light, moisture, and temperature on lipid products can be measured with the foregoing analytical methods established for fats and oils products. However, the oxidation and hydrolysis resistance factors can change when the fats and oils products are incorporated into a food product and processed. Shortening and margarine products are major ingredients of bakery products. In this application, the fats and oils products must withstand baking temperatures without flavor degradation while in contact with moisture and other ingredients. The pastry flavor test evaluates a shortening or margarine product in a high-fat baked product also containing flour, moisture, and salt for an extended period at baking temperatures. Sensory flavor and odor evaluations of the baked product will identify oxidation, hydrolysis, or other organoleptic problems or changes. This evaluation, outlined in the nonstandardized methods section, can be utilized for product development and to audit the products produced. 3.6 COLOR AND APPEARANCE Color and appearance of fats and oils are not monitored solely for aesthetic qualities, although this is an important parameter. Color and appearance are important for many reasons, but ultimately the factors of color and appearance relate to the cost of processing, the quality of the finished product, and what the products look like to the end user. Most oils are yellowish-red or amber liquids. The color is due to the presence of carotenoid or chlorophyll pigments, the latter imparting a greenish cast to the oil. Some crude oils can have unexpectedly high pigmentation caused by field damage, improper storage, or faulty handling during crushing, extraction, or rendering. Color measurement will determine the condition of the product as received to identify the necessary blending, processing, and handling procedures; to support claims against vendors; and to prevent contamination of prime-quality oils with problem products. During processing, product appearance may be an indicator of a problem.
Fats and Oils Analysis
225
Improper bleaching, oxidation, ineffective filtration, and other problems can be indicated by color darkening or lack of color change. 3.6.1 Color Changes in the color of fats and oils finished products are perceived as indicating poor-quality product, regardless of the reason or effect upon performance. Consumers may not consciously notice the color of a bottled oil unless it appears different from other products on the shelf. Marketing has successfully promoted lighter or whiter oil as being better for most salad oils and shortenings. Food processors usually have ingredient specifications that identify the allowable color parameters because the fats and oils product may have the ability to enhance or diminish the appearance of the prepared food product. Product colors of fats and oils must be monitored as they are received to maintain both real and perceived product quality. 3.6.1.1 Wesson Color Method AOCS Method Cc13b-45 determines the color of a melted fat or oil product by comparison with red and yellow Lovibond® glasses of known characteristics.1 The oil sample is placed in an optical glass tube with a path length of either 1.0 or 5.25 inches and then viewed by the operator to begin the color match. This is done by superimposing a mixture of red and yellow standards over the reference field, which is adjacent to the oil sample. The 5.25-inch tube is utilized for most samples except for dark oils, which exceed a 40.0 red at this level. It is standard practice to indicate when the 1.0-inch level has been utilized, but the 5.25-inch level is understood. The Wesson method using Lovibond glasses is an abbreviated version of a method originally developed in England for measuring the color of beer. Color has three attributes, but the Wesson method ignores the brightness factor and is interested only in the degree of redness. Yellow is necessary to make colors look similar to allow assessment of redness, but the amount of yellow is considered unimportant for this method. Therefore, the use of a fixed yellow value was adopted with only the red being viewed as critical. The fixed yellow ratio is 10.0 yellow to 1.0 red for most oils with red color readings under 3.5; higher yellow settings are specified for the darker oils. The Wesson method is the principal color method for the U.S. edible-oil industry and has been utilized for many years primarily because of its simplicity; however, some difficulties arise as a result of such oversimplification: (1) apparent red values are reduced when chlorophyll is present in the oil, (2) brown pigments interfere with red and yellow comparisons, and (3) visual comparisons must be made.44 Visual color measurement is less acceptable because the operator must be adept at matching colors and also must have good color vision. 3.6.1.2 Lovibond (British Standard) AOCS Method Cc 13e-92 utilizes a Lovibond Tintometer® that has become the standard in most countries other than the United States. The geometry and color
226
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
scales for the Wesson and Lovibond methods are different; consequently, the results are not compatible. The vital parts of the Lovibond Tintometer are the series of red, yellow, and blue permanently colored glass standards. These standards vary from water-white colors to deep reds, yellows, and blues. Each standard color is numbered and subtly different from the one preceding and following it. The addition of the blue color field provides a greater degree of brightness and greenness than for the Wesson method.45 3.6.1.3 Spectrophotometric Color Method for Oils This method represents an attempt to measure the color of fats and oils with an automatic instrument to eliminate the visual judgment requirement for operators. In 1950, AOCS Method Cc 13c-50 was tentatively adopted for the spectrophotometric determination of oil color to replace the manual Lovibond systems. A collaborative study that included 30,000 color measurements determined the best wavelengths to use to measure the color of oil. These wavelengths were then used to develop an equation to relate the spectrophotometric readings to Lovibond values. The calculations were designed to give values identical to Lovibond color values using the Wesson method.46 In general, the calculated values agree, but wide discrepancies occur with some oils. The photometric color method has not replaced the Wesson method because of occasional disagreement, economics, and firm entrenchment of the visual procedure. Nevertheless, AOCS Cc 13c-50 (Spectrophotometric Color Method for Oils) is an official method.1 3.6.1.4 Automatic Tintometers Electronic color instruments with three filters have been introduced by several equipment manufacturers to replace the manual color procedures. The automatic instruments have been designed to conform to AOCS Method Cc 13b-45, as well as the European procedure, or AOCS Method Cc 13e-45. These instruments have performed well with light-colored oils, but have had poor agreement with darker oils or products containing certain additives, such as emulsifiers. 3.6.1.5 FAC (Fatty Acid Committee) Method Inedible tallow and grease colors are often too dark or too green to read on the Lovibond Tintometer, even with the 1.0-inch column. An arbitrary system of color standards was developed for identification of the dark colors. AOCS Method Cc 13a43 employs standard color tubes for comparison of oils in a similar tube. The FAC standards consist of 26 permanent color tubes numbered from 1 to 45 in odd numbers, with three overlapping series: one normal, one green, and one red. The spacing of the tubes is not uniform on purpose. This method, far from precise, has been used mainly for inedible oils because of its ease of application.
Fats and Oils Analysis
227
3.6.1.6 Gardner Color The Gardner scale is a single number scale used mainly to categorize lecithin, paint or drying oils, fatty acids, and some other oil derivatives. These standards are patterned along the same lines as the FAC standard, but bear no direct relationship. The Gardner standards consist of glass standards numbered from 1 to 18, lightest to darkest. Gardner color has been standardized with AOCS Method Td 1a-64.1 3.6.1.7 Chlorophyll The presence of green pigments or chlorophyll is of interest not only because of their impact on the color of the finished product, but also because chlorophyll can act as a sensitizer for fats and oils oxidation. These pigments must be removed in the prebleaching process. AOCS Method Cc 13d-55 is used to determine the chlorophyll content (parts per million) of vegetable oils by spectrophotometric absorption measurements at 630, 670, and 710 nm.1 The method is not applicable to hydrogenated and deodorized oils because the 670-nm absorption is missing in most processed oils. 3.6.1.8 Coloring Agents Determination Yellow colors are often added to fats and oils products to simulate the appearance of butter. Carotenes, annattos, and apocarotenals are the primary colorants utilized. Yellow additives are extremely difficult, if not impossible, to control with the two-dimensional Lovibond color measurements. Spectrophotometric measurements of yellow density at wave lengths of 440, 455, or 460 millimicrons, depending on the product, provide better control for these additives. 3.6.2 Appearance The first and most obvious product characteristic evaluated by any consumer of a finished fats and oils product has to be its appearance. Appearance is an important attribute because the initial impression usually influences subsequent judgments, even though most of the appearance properties have only an aesthetics value. These characteristics usually have little effect on performance; however, abnormal appearance characteristics can indicate a handling or storage problem, poor processing techniques, and stability or other quality problems. 3.6.2.1 Product Appearance Ratings Visual examinations are the best way to get a meaningful evaluation of product appearance as a whole. Appearance ratings are subjective opinions based on experience to assign numerical values for comparison purposes. Product appearance evaluations of solidified products include surface and internal appearance characteristics. The uniformity of color, hue, and textural qualities of a product are rated both for
228
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
the surface of the product and internally after sectioning, cutting, or scraping. The textural ratings evaluate each product for deficiencies, such as mottles, streaks, oil separation, and other problems that can be related to specific processing or formulation problems. The apparent color cast and sheen ratings can be related to bleaching deficiencies, color additions, or plasticization problems. Procedures for appearance evaluations and ratings are detailed in the nonstandardized method section. Appearance evaluations are useful measurement tools for product development as well as process quality control. 3.7 REFINING AND BLEACHING Specific refining and bleaching analyses are necessary for crude oil receipts for three distinct purposes: (1) as a basis for settlement of crude contracts under the trading rules of the various oil trading associations, (2) as a yardstick for the efficiency of the refining and bleaching operations, and (3) as indicators for caustic and bleaching earths types and levels for processing. Most crude vegetable oils are traded on the basis of refining loss or neutral oil, refined or bleached color, and flavor. Trading rules for vegetable oils have been established in the United States by three associations: National Cottonseed Producers Association, National Soybean Processors Association, and National Institute of Oilseed Products. All three of these organizations accept the AOCS methods as the basis for trading. For most oils, settlement is based on agreement between the buyer and seller of the results of specified analytical methods within an established variance performed on the same sample. Results beyond the established differences are settled by an Official Referee Chemist’s analysis. 3.7.1 Refining Loss About 85 years ago, cottonseed crushers and oil producers agreed to a series of specifications for crude cottonseed oil. Agreement for price concessions for products less than prime were determined for refining loss, odor, taste, and color. The refining loss penalty assessed was 0.75% for each percent in excess of 9.0% loss. This agreement led to the development of the “cup loss” method for refining a sample of crude oil in the laboratory in a manner that would simulate plant operations to the extent of providing approximate refining losses and refined color assessments. Initially, this method was very subjective, allowing laboratory technicians to rely on their best judgment as to how to perform the evaluation for the best loss result. In 1927, it was agreed that a premium would be paid by the buyer for crude cottonseed oils with a loss below 9.0%. This agreement offered the crude mills an incentive to produce better grades of oil, but at the same time made loss results suspect because the method relied on the judgment and expertise of laboratory technicians. Standardization of the laboratory cup refining procedure made the results less variable, and the technicians performing the analysis no longer had to be refining experts.47
Fats and Oils Analysis
229
AOCS Method Ca 9a-52 determines the loss of free fatty acids, oil, and impurities when the sample is treated with alkali solutions under the specific conditions of the test.1 The actual method simulates kettle refining on a laboratory basis with standardized levels and strengths of sodium hydroxide solution, temperatures, and holding periods to promote reproducible results within and between laboratories. The refining loss is calculated by subtracting the refined oil sample weight from the original crude oil sample weight. 3.7.2 Neutral Oil and Loss The laboratory cup refining test was acceptable when open-kettle refining was common practice, but improvements in refining processes provided losses lower than the laboratory estimates. Various methods for estimating the neutral-oil content in a crude oil were explored. These procedures identified the theoretical recoverable oil in the crude oil sample for comparison to actual results to determine refining efficiency. Of the methods and techniques evaluated, an International Chemical Union chromatographic procedure appeared most appropriate because it was found to be reasonably accurate, the most reproducible, easy, and quick to carry out, and it required no special elaborate or expensive equipment.48 This procedure was the basis for AOCS Method Ca 9f-57 (Neutral Oil and Loss). The neutral oil and loss method extracts the oil or fatty materials on a column of activated alumina by ether-methanol. The mixture extracted consists primarily of triglycerides and unsaponifiable material. Reproducibility has been found to be good, that is, two single determinations performed within a laboratory should not differ by more than 0.15% and not more than 0.30% between laboratories.1 3.7.3 Bleaching Analysis Adsorption bleaching is used both in the plant and in the laboratory. The laboratory technique involves the addition of a bleaching earth or carbon, or both, to refined oil, heating it to 120°C, and holding it at that temperature for 5 (± 1) minutes while agitating at 250 (± 10) rpm. Afterward, the earth is removed by filtration and the oil color is determined. Bleaching analyses are performed with oils from the cup-loss evaluation or laboratory-refined samples for the bleach evaluations. Two AOCS methods are available for bleaching fats and oils; both utilize the same procedure, but the specified amount of AOCS natural bleaching earth is different and one has a provision for the use of activated bleaching earth for high-green soybean and sunflower oil. AOCS Method Cc 8a-52 is applicable to refined cottonseed oils, and AOCS Method Cc 8b-52 is applicable for soybean and sunflower oils.1 3.8 PERFORMANCE TESTING Some essential attributes contributed by fats and oils cannot be directly measured with chemical or physical analytical methods. In these cases, performance
230
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
testing is the only means for evaluating the ability of the fats or oils product to perform the desired functions in a food product. Actual determinations of the performance qualities of edible fats and oils products are made with small-scale practical tests that evaluate how the product will perform in a finished product. Successful performance tests are designed with standardized conditions and ingredients, with critical formulations being chosen in regard to the property evaluated to highlight small differences in performance. Performance testing is essential for the development of new products, especially for fats and oils products designed for a specific food product, formulation, or process. After development, physical or chemical analysis can be related to performance results in most situations; however, continuation of certain performance evaluations is necessary for some products to ensure adequate performance or more timely results in some cases. Initially, most performance testing was designed for bakery products, but has now been expanded to every specialty product situation — baking, frying, candy, coatings, formulated foods, nondairy products, and so forth — wherever tailored shortenings, margarines, oils, and other specialty products are utilized. In many cases, the performance tests are developed to evaluate the fat or oil ingredient as it would be used by a specific food processor. Fats and oils performance testing is performed by most processors, but the procedures utilized have never been standardized for the industry. Performance testing is an analytical technique similar to other laboratory evaluations. The procedures must be designed to incorporate good laboratory techniques, which include standardization of equipment, ingredients, procedures, results reporting, and control of the environment. Performance results must be reproducible to be of value for comparative purposes. Reproducibility is achieved by controlling variables that can be controlled only by the use of standardized methods. The performance test procedures must be written with adequate detail and followed closely. A review of some of the most common performance evaluations follows, and complete performance testing procedures are presented in the nonstandardized methods section of this chapter. 3.8.1 Creaming Volume Cake batter aeration can be affected by plasticity, consistency, emulsification, basestock formulation, and other fats and oils properties. Creaming-volume evaluations measure the ability of a shortening or margarine to incorporate and retain air in a cake batter. In most cases, batter aeration is an indicator of the baked cake volume, grain, and texture and materially affects the handling qualities of the cake batter. The creaming volume test formula consists of only three ingredients: (1) test shortening or margarine, (2) granulated sugar, and (3) whole eggs. This procedure is the first stage of an old-fashioned pound cake where the cake batter aeration depends on the creaming properties of the shortening with whole eggs. The specific gravity of a batter is determined after mixing for 15 minutes and again after 20 minutes. Continued aeration, identified by a decrease in batter-specific gravity, indicates that the fats or oils product has a stable consistency that has not broken down to allow the release of air from the batter. Specific gravity (grams per cubic centimeter) can
Fats and Oils Analysis
231
Table 3.2 Cake Appearance Scoring Score
Rating
Internal and External Description
10
Perfect
Fine regular grain; no holes, cracks or tunnels; very thin cell walls; and perfect symmetry
9
Very Good
Close regular grain; free of holes, cracks or tunnels; thin cell walls; and very good symmetry
8
Good
Very slightly open grain but regular; free of cracks or tunnels; may have an occasional hole; good cell wall thickness; slight liquid ring on crust
7
Satisfactory
Slightly open grain, mostly regular; a few small holes; no tunnels or cracks; slightly thick cell walls
6
Poor
Open, irregular grain or frequent holes; some cracks or tunnels; very slight liquid ring on crust
5
Unsatisfactory
Very open, irregular grain, or numerous holes, cracks, or tunnels; thick, heavy cell walls; may have solid streaks or gum line; definite liquid ring on crust
4 and below
Increasing degrees of unsatisfactory performance
be converted to specific volume (cubic centimeters per 100 grams) by multiplying the reciprocal of the specific gravity by 100. Specific volume better illustrates the amount or degree of aeration. This performance test is applicable to emulsified, as well as nonemulsified, products to measure aeration potential in a cake batter. 3.8.2 Pound Cake Test In some cases, shortening or margarine creaming value is most accurately measured by preparing a regular pound cake, omitting the chemical leavener, and measuring the volume, grain, and texture of the baked cake. Creaming value, as determined by this method, is affected by the batter-mixing temperature. Working range, or creaming range, can be measured by adjusting the finished batter temperature over the desired temperature range. The results obtained in this manner provide a good indication of the creaming range or shortening temperature tolerance. The baked pound cake volume is determined by a seed displacement procedure, and the cake appearance is rated numerically on a scale9 similar to that provided in Table 3.2. 3.8.3 Icing Volume Shortening and margarine formulation, consistency, and plasticity can affect the ability of a product to produce light crème icings. This property can be measured by making a standardized crème icing under controlled conditions. The evaluation procedure is somewhat similar to the creaming-volume evaluation where the aeration potential and mixing tolerance of fats and oils products are measured with specific gravity determinations. However, the results indicate the ability of a product to aerate and retain the incorporated air in a low-moisture icing. The icing ingredients are (1) test shortening, (2) powdered sugar, (3) nonfat milk solids, (4) salt, and (5) slightly less than 12% water, which are mixed for 12 minutes at high speed, stopping
232
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
after 7 and 12 minutes to measure the specific gravity of the icing. These measurements determine the aeration potential and the mixing tolerance of the fats and oils product. A fats and oils product with poor mixing tolerance will either aerate very little or will give up a portion of the incorporated air after the first specific gravity determination. This evaluation is applicable to emulsified and nonemulsified fats and oils products to measure the aeration potential in a crème icing. 3.8.4 White Layer Cakes Fats and oils perform several important functions in all cake products. These functions include entrapment of air during the creaming process, lubrication of the gluten and starch particles to break up the continuity of the gluten/starch structure of the cell walls for a tender crumb, and emulsification or water-holding capabilities that affect moistness and cake-keeping qualities. The emulsification value of a fats and oils product may be defined as its ability to make a white layer cake in which the flour content is low, but the sugar and moisture contents are high. The best method for determining emulsion value of a shortening or margarine is to test the product in a high-sugar, white layer cake under standard conditions, evaluating the finished cake for volume, crust characteristics, grain, and texture. Previous results have shown that shortenings with poor emulsification properties produce curdled or separated batters and cakes with low volumes, pale sticky crusts, and a raw flour taste. Properly emulsified products will produce smooth cake batters and cakes with golden brown crusts, somewhat dry to the touch without a liquid ring, with a fine grain and texture, and with good eating characteristics.49 Over-emulsified shortenings produce cakes that dip or have a weak center with a very open grain and a coarse texture. Three white layer cake performance tests are utilized for the evaluation of general-purpose shortenings and margarines: (1) 140% sugar white cake, (2) 105% sugar white cake, and (3) household white layer cake. The cake performance tests are designed for the fat- and oil-type product to be evaluated: • Emulsified product: The high-sugar, egg white, and liquid cake measures the ability of an emulsified shortening or margarine to produce a high-volume, moist cake with a fine grain and texture. • Nonemulsified product: A lower sugar, moisture, and egg cake formulation is used for the evaluation of the emulsification properties contributed solely by the product consistency of the all-purpose shortening or margarine product. • Household shortening: Shortenings produced for household use usually have a low emulsifier content designed to improve baking performance, but not enough to drastically affect frying performance. Therefore, household baking recipes are designed for this level of emulsifier.
3.8.5 Crème Filling Test The ability of a shortening or margarine to take up and hold water while aerating to a low-filling specific gravity is an important attribute for crème fillings for
Fats and Oils Analysis
233
snack cakes. Equally important is the resistance of the filling to weep or disappear into the base cake. Shortening plasticity, heat resistance, and emulsification can be measured by crème-filling performance testing. Initially, the ability of the shortening product to aerate the filling is measured during preparation and, subsequently, the weep and heat stability of the fillings are evaluated. This evaluation measures the emulsifier system as well as the consistency of the shortening as provided by the basestock formulation. 3.8.6 Cake Mix Evaluation Originally, cake mix formulations were very similar to bakery cakes and utilized standard high-ratio cake shortenings; however, development of improved cake mixes required rapid aerating shortenings to minimize mixing times for the housewife, while at the same time increasing the products mixing and baking tolerances. The competitive nature of the cake mix industry has continued to generate demands for new and improved products of which shortening has always been a major contributor. A basic white cake mix formulation and make-up procedure can serve to evaluate new or revised emulsifier systems for aeration, eating qualities, and cake shelf life as well as the shortening carrier for lubrication and consistency. 3.8.7 Puff Pastry Testing The characteristic features of a puff pastry shortening are plasticity and firmness. Plasticity is necessary to produce smooth, unbroken layers of fat between dough layers during repeated folding and rolling operations performed at retarder temperatures to achieve over 1200 layers. Firmness is equally important because soft or oily fat products can be absorbed by the dough, thus eliminating its role as a barrier between the dough layers. The laminated puff pastry dough rises in the oven when the fat layers melt and expand, creating steam if the fat contains moisture, which causes the layers to separate and the product to expand and rise without the benefit of a leavening agent. Satisfactory performance is a five- to sixfold increase in the height of a test patty shell after baking. 3.8.8 Restaurant Deep-Fat Frying Evaluation A number of factors are studied when evaluating frying shortenings and oils. During deep-fat frying, the fat is exposed continuously to elevated temperatures in the presence of air and moisture. A number of chemical reactions, including oxidation and hydrolysis, occur during this time, as well as changes due to thermal decomposition. As these reactions proceed, the functional, sensory, and nutritional quality of the frying fat changes and eventually reaches a point where it is no longer possible to prepare quality fried products, and the fat will have to be discarded. The rate of frying fat deterioration varies with the food fried, the frying fat utilized, the fryer design, and the operating conditions.
234
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Good testing procedure limits the variables to the product being evaluated. The method should be designed to incorporate techniques that are practiced in any good laboratory, including the standardization of equipment, control of the environment, and an explicit evaluation procedure. Frying tests have been attempted in commercial restaurant frying operations. However, cause and effect determinations for the results obtained are difficult to assess due to the changing product mix, handling conditions, and other unknown conditions and contaminants. A laboratory test procedure employing the smallest available commercial fryers to continuously heat the frying shortening and frying of French-cut potatoes at prescribed intervals has been found to adequately evaluate frying fats. This procedure allows the frying fat deterioration to be monitored visually, organoleptically, and with chemical and physical analytical testing for assessment of the cause and effect. The deep-fat frying evaluation consists of controlled heating of the test shortening or oils at 360°F (± 10°F) (182.2 ± 5.6°C) continuously until the test is terminated. Fresh French-cut potatoes (227 grams) fried three times daily for seven minutes at three-hour intervals are flavored once daily. Frying observations recorded after each frying include smoking, odor, clarity, gum formation, and a determination of foam development. Foam development (described as none, trace, slight, definite, and persistent) should also be measured with a foam test daily and each time a change in the observed foam is recorded. Samples are taken after each 24-hour period for analysis of color, free fatty acid, and iodine value for quantitative measurement of darkening, hydrolysis, and polymerization. The frying test is terminated when persistent foam has been observed and substantiated by foam height testing. 3.8.9 Ice Cream Bar Coating Evaluation Ice cream novelties are usually enrobed with a confectionery coating that utilizes a relatively high fat content. The function of the fats utilized are viscosity control, crystallization, gloss retention, and eating characteristics. These characteristics must be measured to identify the acceptability of the coating fat by actually dipping ice cream bars into prepared coatings. The qualities measured to determine acceptability are drying time, hardening time, brittleness or snap, bar coverage, flavor, eating characteristics, and gloss retention. 3.9 NONSTANDARDIZED METHODS A number of nonstandardized methods have been reviewed for the evaluation of fats and oils in this chapter. Complete test methods for these evaluations are presented on the following pages. All these evaluations have been successfully employed for product development, quality control, or auditing of current production products and those of the competition. The methods presented are
Fats and Oils Analysis
235
Method
Description
3.1
Shortening consistency and plasticity rating
5.3
Pastry flavor test
6.2
Shortening appearance rating
6.3
Margarine appearance rating
8.1
Creaming volume test
8.2
Pound cake test
8.3
Icing volume
8.4
140% sugar white cake
8.5
105% sugar white cake
8.6
Household white layer cake test
8.7
Crème filling test
8.8
White, dry cake mix test
8.9
Puff pastry testing
8.10
Deep-fat frying test
8.11
Ice cream bar coating test
8.12
Sandwich cookie filler shortening evaluation
236
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Nonstandardized Method 3.1 Shortening Consistency and Plasticity Rating
• Description: A systematic, uniform means of rating the consistency and plasticity of crystallized fats and oils products • Scope: Applicable to all shortenings, margarines, and other plasticized fats and oils products • Equipment: Constant 80°F-temperature storage room Illumination of 50 to 100 foot-candles at the examination surface from cool white fluorescent lamps Thermometer with 0 to 120°F range and 1°F gradations • Procedure: 1. Temper the samples to achieve the required 75 to 80°F examination temperature. 2. Determine and record the sample temperature. 3. Examine the consistency and plasticity of the sample by pressing a finger into the product or squeezing it in the hand, or both. This procedure identifies imperfections in the sample. 4. Some of the most common consistency problems found with plasticized products include: Puffy, a soft product with large air cells or pockets that offer very little resistance when pressed or squeezed. Sandy, small lumps about the size of grains of sand felt throughout the sample. Ribby, alternating thin layers of hard and soft product, which has been described as feeling like a coarse corduroy cloth surface. Brittle, a firm resistance that cracks as a finger is pressed through the product. Mushy, soft and greasy feeling with very little, if any, resistance. Lumpy, sizable firm clumps within a softer or plastic consistency. Chalky, a dry putty-like feeling. 5. Plasticity ratings evaluate the workability of a crystallized product. A product with perfect plasticity would retain a good body feel without releasing liquid or remaining rigid when worked in the hand. A plastic material will not flow or deform from its own weight but should be easily molded with only slight pressure. 6. Consistency and plasticity should each be rated overall using the following 10-point scale: 10 – Perfect
5 – Definitely unsatisfactory
9 – Nearly perfect
4 – Bad
8 – Good or satisfactory
3 – Definitely bad
7 – Slightly unsatisfactory
2 – Very bad
6 – Moderately unsatisfactory
1 – Terrible
Note: All products should be rated objectively without reference to the type of product, its age, or other qualifying factors.
Fats and Oils Analysis
237
Nonstandardized Method 5.3 Pastry Flavor Test • Description: Subjects the test fat or oil product to prolonged high-temperature heat in the presence of moisture, salt, and flour for oxidative stability measurement by sensory flavor and odor evaluations. • Scope: Applicable to all fats and oils products (i.e., shortening, margarine, flakes, chips, liquid shortenings, and oils). • Equipment: Mixing bowl Pastry cutter Pastry cloth Dusting flour Rolling pin Two steel sizing rods, 1/8 inch in diameter and 8 inches long Cookie or biscuit cutter, 2 inches in diameter Sheet pan Kitchen fork Scale, graduated in grams, with scale pan and counter balance Bakery oven • Formula: Ingredients
100
Pastry flour
150
Salt Water
Grams
Test fat
3 50
• Procedure: 1. Scale the fat, flour, and salt into the mixing bowl. 2. Cut the fat and the flour together to obtain small pea-sized lumps. 3. Add the water and mix together until the mixture balls together. 4. Roll out the dough on a flour-dusted pastry cloth using the 1/8-inch-diameter rods to control thickness. 5. Cut four dough circles with the 2-inch cookie cutter. 6. Place the four dough circles on the sheet pan and perforate with the kitchen fork. 7. Bake at 300°F for one hour. 8. Cool for 15 minutes and evaluate the flavor and odor using the 10-point scale applicable to fresh-oil sensory testing.
238
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Nonstandardized Method 6.2 Shortening Appearance Rating
• Definition: Evaluates and rates shortening surface and textural appearance by using a scale of 10 (perfection) to l (worst possible) • Scope: Applicable to all plasticized shortenings, both fresh and aged • Equipment: Constant 80°F temperature-controlled area Illumination of 50 to 100 foot-candles at the examination surface from cool white fluorescent lamps Thermometer with a 0 to 120°F range and 1°F gradations Stainless steel spatula with 6-inch blade • Sample preparation: 1. The shortening sample must be permitted to achieve a temperature of 75 to 80°F before examination. 2. A portion of the sample should be removed from one side of the container without disturbing the remaining surface area. Cut a thin slit into the undisturbed portion from the area where the portion was removed. • Procedure: 1. Determine and record the sample temperature to the nearest °F. 2. Examine the shortening sample by using the special lighting to highlight the sample surface. 3. Rate the appearance of the shortening by using the appearance and rating scale as a guide. All the items should be considered in determining the overall grade. It is not necessary that the grade on each of the seven basic characteristics be recorded for each sample; however, if a sample is rated 8 or lower, the major defects observed should be recorded. 4. All products should be graded objectively without reference to the type of product, age, or history.
Fats and Oils Analysis
239
Shortening Appearance Rating Scale Textural Appearance
Color
Surface
Grade
Cast*
Sheen
Visual**
Mottles
Streaks
10
none
perfect
perfect
none
none
very
very
very
very few
9
slight
good
good
& small
good
good
slight 8
cast
6
cast
fair
definitely
slightly
off
dull
5
fair poor
small
none
numerous
few &
& small
small
very few
numerous
& large
& small
very
few &
few &
poor
& large
& large
numerous numerous 4
none
none
few &
moderate 7
Oil Vaselation Separation
dull
& large
& large
none very slight
very 3
dull
2 1
definitely
very
off
dull
slight
none
bad
slight
bad
bad
numerous numerous poor
& large
& large
Notes: * Red, yellow, green, or gray cast for the product as a whole or as observed in the thin slit cut in the surface of the shortening. ** The usual visual textural characteristics observed are pock marks, pimples, or a spongy appearance.
240
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Nonstandardized Method 6.3 Margarine Appearance Rating
• Description: A systematic, uniform means of grading the surface and internal appearance and visual texture of margarine products • Scope: Applicable to all margarine and spread products • Equipment: Constant 45 ± 5°F temperature-controlled storage area Illumination of 50 to 100 foot-candles at the examination surface Thermometer with 0 to 120°F range and 1°F gradations Stainless steel spatula with 6-inch blade Hansen’s Color Comparison Card for Butter • Procedure: 1. The margarine samples must have achieved a temperature of 45 ± 5°F before examination. 2. Carefully open the margarine containers. 3. Determine and record the temperature of the margarine sample to the nearest °F. 4. Scrape a portion of the sample surface to expose the interior of the sample. 5. Examine the margarine samples by utilizing the special lighting to highlight the margarine surface. 6. Rate the appearance of the margarine by using the margarine rating scale as a guide. It is not necessary to record the rate for each characteristic for each sample; however, if a sample is rated an 8 or below, the defects should be recorded. 7. All products should be rated objectively without reference to product type, age, or history.
Fats and Oils Analysis
241
Margarine Surface and Internal Appearance Rating Scale Color
Surface
Grade Hansen Streaks Sheen Oxidized Specks Grainy
Free
Pin
Water
Holes
Puffy
none
none
none
target 10
chip
none
perfect
target
very
9
chip
good
8
chip
none
none
none
±1
7 6
good
none
none
fair
none
very
slight
very
1 to 2
none
slight
dull
slight
3 to 4
slight
slight
dull
slight
5 to 6
slight
bad
dull
none
7 to 8
definite
very
very
bad
dull
slight
9 to 10
bad
10
very
definite
plus
bad
very
±1 5
chip
4
chip
none
±2
3
very
2 1
none
slight
slight
slight
bad
bad
bad very bad
±2
very
very
very
very
very
chip
bad
dull
bad
bad
bad
bad
242
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Nonstandardized Method 8.1 Creaming Volume Test • Definition: Measures the ability of a plasticized shortening or margarine to incorporate and retain air in a cake batter; batter aeration is an indicator of baked cake volume, grain, and texture • Scope: Applicable to all plasticized shortenings and margarines for use in cake production • Equipment: C-100 Hobart mixer equipped with 3-quart bowl and paddle Scale graduated in grams Scale pan with counter balance Thermometer with 0 to 120°F range and 1°F gradations Specific gravity cup Stainless steel spatula with 6-inch blade • Test formula: Ingredients Test shortening
Grams
Use Temperature (°F)
227
70–80
Granulated sugar
454
70–80
Whole eggs
227
50–60
• Procedure: l. Scale sugar and shortening into 3-quart bowl and cream at second speed for 5 minutes. Stop machine, scrape bowl and paddle. 2. Add half of the whole eggs and continue creaming at second speed for 2.5 minutes. Stop machine, scrape bowl and paddle. 3. Add remainder of whole eggs and continue creaming at second speed for 2.5 minutes. Stop machine, scrape bowl and paddle. 4. Continue creaming at second speed for 5 minutes. Stop machine, determine and record specific gravity, and then scrape the bowl and paddle. 5. Continue creaming at second speed for 5 minutes. Stop machine, record specific gravity and finished batter temperature. • Results reporting: Creaming volume results can be reported either as specific gravity (grams/cubic centimeter) or as volume (cubic centimeters/100 grams). Volume is calculated by multiplying the reciprocal of the specific gravity by 100. Volume may also be determined by the “direct method” which involves measurement of the volume of 100 grams of the creamed batter by displacement of alcohol in a graduated cylinder.
Fats and Oils Analysis
243
Nonstandardized Method 8.2 Pound Cake Test • Definition: Evaluation of the creaming properties of plasticized shortenings and margarines by measuring the volume and rating the grain and texture of a pound cake made without chemical leavening • Scope: Applicable for all plasticized shortenings and margarines designed for cake production • Equipment: C-100 Hobart mixer equipped with 10-quart bowl and paddle Scale graduated in grams with weighing pan and counter balance Specific gravity cup, calibrated Stainless steel spatula with 6-inch blade Thermometer with 0 to 120°F range and 1°F gradations Standard, paper-lined, 1-pound loaf pan Bakery oven Cake volumeter, seed displacement type or equivalent • Formula: Ingredients
Grams
Test shortening
340
Cake flour
340
Granulated sugar
681
Salt
7
Liquid milk
142
Liquid milk
227
Whole eggs
340
Cake flour
340
Mixing Stage First stage
Second stage Third stage
• Procedure: l. Scale the ingredients for the first stage into the 3-quart mixing bowl and mix 30 seconds at first speed. Stop the mixer, scrape the bowl and paddle. 2. Cream 2 minutes at second speed. Stop the mixer, scrape the bowl and paddle. 3. Cream 2 additional minutes at second speed. Stop the mixer, scrape the bowl and paddle. 4. Add half of the second-stage liquids and mix 1 minute at first speed. Stop the mixer, scrape the bowl and paddle. 5. Add the flour from stage three and mix 1 minute at first speed. 6. Add the remainder of stage-two liquids and mix 1 minute at first speed. Stop the mixer, scrape the bowl and paddle. 7. Cream 5 minutes at first speed. Stop the mixer, determine and record the specific gravity and batter temperature. 8. Scale 510 grams of batter into the loaf pan and bake 60 to 65 minutes at 360°F. 9. Remove the cake from the pan, cool for 2 hours, determine the weight and volume of the baked cake, and then score the internal characteristics.
244
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Nonstandardized Method 8.3 Icing Volume • Definition: Measures the amount of air that can be incorporated and retained by plasticized shortening or margarine in a low-moisture crème icing • Scope: Applicable to all plasticized shortenings and margarines designated for icing preparation, both emulsified and nonemulsified • Equipment: C-100 Hobart mixer equipped with 3-quart bowl and paddle Scale, graduated in grams, with scale pan and counterbalance Thermometer with 0 to 120°F range and 1°F gradations Specific gravity cup, calibrated Stainless steel spatula with 6-inch blade • Formula: Ingredients
Grams
Use Temperature (°F)
Test shortening
227
70–80
Powdered sugar
908
70–80
Nonfat milk solids
56
70–80
Salt
7
70–80
Water
160
70–80
• Procedure: l. Scale all ingredients into the mixing bowl and cream 2 minutes at first speed. Stop the mixer, scrape the bowl and paddle. 2. Mix at third speed for 5 minutes. Stop the mixer, determine and record the specific gravity, and scrape the bowl and paddle. 3. Mix at third speed for 5 minutes. Stop the mixer, determine and record the specific gravity and icing temperature. • Results reporting: Icing volume results can be reported either as specific gravity (grams/cubic centimeter) or as volume (cubic centimers/100 grams). Volume is calculated by multiplying the reciprocal of the specific gravity by 100. Volume may also be determined by the “direct method” which involves measurement of the volume of 100 grams of the icing by displacement of alcohol in a graduated cylinder.
Fats and Oils Analysis
245
Nonstandardized Method 8.4 140% Sugar White Cake • Definition: Volume, external, and internal measurements of a high-sugar, egg, and moisture cake formulation used to determine the emulsification value of a shortening or emulsifier system • Scope: Applicable for evaluation of all emulsified cake shortenings and emulsifier systems • Equipment: C-100 Hobart mixer equipped with 3-quart bowl and paddle Scale, graduated in grams, with scale pan and counter balance Specific gravity cup Stainless steel spatula with 6-inch blade Thermometer with 0 to 120°F range and 1°F gradations Two 8-inch, greased, layer-cake pans lined with parchment paper Bakery oven Cake volumeter, seed displacement type or equivalent • Formula: Ingredients
Grams
Test shortening
250
Granulated sugar
638
Nonfat milk solids
42
Baking powder
28
Salt
14
Cake flour
454
Water
212
Egg whites
340
Water
200
Mixing Stage First stage
Second stage
• Procedure: 1. Scale the shortening and all the first-stage dry ingredients into the 3-quart mixing bowl and premix for 30 seconds at first speed. 2. Add the first-stage water and mix for 3 minutes at first speed. Stop the mixer, scrape the bowl and paddle. 3. Continue mixing for 3 minutes at first speed. 4. Add half of the second-stage liquid and mix at first speed for 1 minute. Stop the mixer, scrape the bowl and paddle. 5. Add the remaining liquid and mix 1 minute at first speed. Stop the mixer, scrape the bowl and paddle. 6. Continue mixing for 4 minutes at first speed. Stop the mixer; determine and record the batter specific gravity and temperature. 7. Scale 400 grams of batter into each of the two 8-inch layer pans.
246
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
8. Bake approximately 22 minutes at 360°F. 9. Remove the layers from the pans, cool 2 hours, cut each layer in half, score the internal characteristics, and determine and record the weight and volume of the two cake layers.
Fats and Oils Analysis
247
Nonstandardized Method 8.5 105% Sugar White Layer Cake • Definition: Low-sugar cake formulation to evaluate the emulsification value of a nonemulsified shortening • Scope: Applicable to all nonemulsified cake shortenings • Equipment: C-100 Hobart mixer equipped with 3-quart bowl and paddle Scale, graduated in grams, with scale pan and counter balance Specific gravity cup Stainless steel spatula with 6-inch blade Thermometer with 0 to 120°F range and 1°F gradations Two 8-inch, greased, layer-cake pans lined with parchment paper Bakery oven Cake volumeter, seed displacement type or equivalent • Formula: Ingredients
Grams
Test shortening Granulated sugar
140 475
Nonfat milk solids
28
Salt
21
Baking powder
28
Cake flour
454
Water
227
Egg whites Water
255 154
Mixing Stage First stage
Second stage
• Procedure: 1. Scale the shortening and all the first-stage dry ingredients into the 3-quart mixing bowl and pre-mix for 30 seconds at first speed. 2. Add the first-stage water and mix for 2 minutes at first speed. Stop the mixer, scrape the bowl and paddle. 3. Continue mixing for 2.5 minutes at first speed. 4. Add half of the second-stage liquid and mix 1 minute at first speed. Stop the mixer, scrape the bowl and paddle. 5. Add the remaining liquid and mix 1 minute at first speed. Stop the mixer, scrape the bowl and paddle. 6. Continue mixing for 3.5 minutes at first speed. Stop the mixer, determine and record the batter specific gravity and temperature. 7. Scale 400 grams of batter into each of the two 8-inch layer pans. 8. Bake approximately 22 minutes at 360°F. 9. Remove the layers from the pans, cool 2 hours, cut each layer in half, score the internal characteristics, and determine and record the weight and volume of the two cake layers.
248
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Nonstandardized Method 8.6 Household White Layer Cake Test • Definition: Volume, internal, and external measurements of a white layer cake prepared with baking ingredients and equipment available in most household kitchens to determine the emulsification value of a household shortening • Scope: Applicable for the evaluation of all household shortenings • Equipment: Sunbeam household-type mixer equipped with beaters and a large bowl, or equivalent Rubber spatula Thermometer with 0 to 120°F range and 1°F gradations Specific gravity cup Two 8-inch, greased, layer-cake pans with parchment paper Scale, graduated in grams, with scale pan and counter balance Household oven • Formula: Ingredients
Grams
Test shortening
100
Granulated sugar
260
Baking powder
12
Salt
6
Cake flour
200
Liquid milk
160
Egg whites
132
Liquid milk
96
Mixing Stage First stage
Second stage
• Procedure: 1. Scale the shortening and all the first-stage dry ingredients into the household mixer bowl. 2. Cream these ingredients together at first speed for 1 minute. 3. Add the first-stage liquid milk and mix for 30 seconds at first speed. 4. Mix for 2 minutes at second speed, scraping the sides of the bowl frequently. 5. Add the second-stage liquids and mix at third speed for 30 seconds. 6. Mix at fourth speed for 2 minutes, scraping the sides of the bowl frequently. 7. Stop mixer; determine and record the batter specific gravity and temperature. 8. Scale 400 grams of the batter into each of the 8-inch greased layer pans and bake for approximately 21 minutes at 360°F. 9. Remove the layers from the pans, cool 2 hours, cut each layer in half, score the internal characteristics, and determine and record the weight and volume of the two cake layers.
Fats and Oils Analysis
249
Nonstandardized Method 8.7 Crème Filling Test • Definition: Measures the ability of a shortening and emulsifier system to aerate to a specific volume of more than 200 cm3 per 100 grams in a crème filling formulation and maintain a stable weep-free consistency even with elevated storage temperature abuse • Scope: Applicable to plasticized shortenings designed to produce fillings for snack cakes and other filling requirements • Equipment: C-100 Hobart mixer equipped with a 10-quart bowl and paddle Scale, graduated in grams, with scale pan and counter balance Specific gravity cup Stainless steel spatula with 6-inch blade Thermometer with 0 to 120°F range and 1°F gradations 4-inch-diameter Pyrex glass funnel Holding rack for the glass funnel 50-cm3 graduated cylinder with 1-cm3 gradations Constant-temperature-controlled cabinet at 100°F Two plastic bags 4-inch × 4-inch square of devil’s food cake • Formula: Ingredients
Grams
Use Temperature (°F)
Test shortening Powdered sugar Nonfat milk solids Salt Water no. 1
567 908 142 7 71
70–75 70–75 70–75 70–75 70–75
Water no. 2
199
70–75
Water no. 3
185
70–75
• Filling test procedure: 1. Scale the shortening and dry ingredients into the 10-quart mixing bowl. 2. Add first water and mix 1 minute at first speed. Stop the mixer, scrape the bowl and paddle. 3. Mix for 10 minutes at second speed. Stop the mixer, determine and record the specific gravity. 4. Add second water and mix 1 minute at first speed. Stop the mixer, scrape the bowl and paddle. 5. Mix 5 minutes at second speed. Stop the mixer, determine and record the specific gravity. 6. Add third water and mix 1 minute at first speed. Stop the mixer, scrape the bowl and paddle. 7. Mix 5 minutes at second speed. Stop the mixer, determine and record the specific gravity and temperature.
250
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
• Weep test procedure: 1. Fold the 7.75-inch-diameter parchment circle into fourths and cut approximately one-half inch off the point. 2. Line the glass funnel with the folded and cut parchment. 3. Weigh 200 grams of the crème filling into the funnel. Carefully smooth the filling above the top of the funnel into a rounded mound. 4. Place the funnel in the holding rack in the 100°F constant-temperature cabinet with the 50-cm3 graduated cylinder under the funnel stem. 5. Determine and record the amount of weep in the graduated cylinder after 24 hours at 100°F. • Filling sandwich test procedure: 1. Slice the 4-inch × 4-inch square of devil’s food cake into two layers each. 2. Scale and spread 50 grams of filling onto one layer and place the mate for the layer on top of the filling. 3. Cut the cake square into two pieces, each measuring 2 inches × 4 inches. Place each in a separate plastic bag and seal. 4. Place one of the cake sandwiches in the 100°F constant-temperature cabinet and hold the other at room temperature (75 ± 2°F). 5. After 6 days, evaluate the cake sandwiches for filling disappearance or soakage into the cake. 6. Report the filling disappearance findings as none, trace, slight, definite, completely disappeared or with other more descriptive terms.
Fats and Oils Analysis
251
Nonstandardized Method 8.8 White Dry Cake Mix Test • Definition: Basic white cake mix formulation and make-up procedure for evaluation of the aeration, lubrication, moisture barrier, and structural qualities provided by a cake mix shortening • Scope: Applicable to all prepared cake mix shortenings • Equipment: Sifter with 1/16-inch openings C-100 Hobart mixer equipped with a 3-quart bowl and paddle Sunbeam household mixer with beaters and large mixing bowl, or equivalent Specific gravity cup Stainless steel spatula with 6-inch blade Rubber spatula Thermometer with 0 to 120°F range and l°F gradations Two 9-inch, greased, layer-cake pans with parchment paper Baking oven Scale, graduated in grams, with a scale pan and counter balance • Formulas: Dry Cake Mix Ingredients Cake Flour Powdered sugar Nonfat milk solids Salt Baking soda V-90, baking acid DCP, baking acid Lecithin Test shortening
Cake Preparation
Grams
Ingredients
Grams
392 442 35 10 7 7 7 1 99
Dry mix Water Egg whites
567 240 66
• Dry mix make-up procedure: 1. Sift the flour and sugar together two times. 2. Sift all the minor dry ingredients together five times. 3. Combine all the dry ingredients and sift together five times. 4. Place the sifted dry-ingredient blend into the 3-quart mixing bowl. 5. Blend the lecithin into the shortening with the metal spatula. 6. Add the shortening/lecithin blend to the dry-ingredient blend in small pieces while mixing at first speed over a 1-minute period. Scrape the bowl and paddle, and mix for 5 minutes at first speed. 7. Force the mixed cake mix through the sifter with the rubber spatula two times. 8. Remix in the Hobart 3-quart bowl for 5 minutes at first speed. 9. Record observations regarding the appearance of the mix and the manner in which the shortening mixed into the dry blend.
252
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
• Cake baking procedure: 1. Scale 567 grams of the cake mix into the household mixing bowl. 2. Add the egg whites and water and blend 1 minute at first speed. 3. Mix 4 minutes at fifth speed while continuously scraping the bowl sides with the rubber spatula. 4. Determine and record the batter specific gravity and temperature. 5. Scale 425 grams of batter into each of the greased 9-inch cake pans lined with parchment. 6. Bake at 360°F until done, or approximately 25 minutes. 7. Remove the cakes from the pans and allow to cool for 2 hours. 8. Cut each layer in half and score and record the internal characteristics. 9. Determine and record the weight and volume of the two layers.
Fats and Oils Analysis
253
Nonstandardized Method 8.9 Puff Pastry Testing • Definition: Evaluates the relative performance qualities of shortenings or margarines to produce “rise” or “puff” in the very light, flaky-type pastries used for patty shells, cream horns, turnovers, etc. • Scope: Applicable to water- or milk-churned margarine or puff pastry fats or to any fat proposed for eventual use in producing puff pastries • Equipment: Scale, graduated in grams, with weighing pan and counter balance A-200 Hobart mixer equipped with a 12-quart bowl and dough hook Thick plastic bowl scraper One 16-inch × 24-inch sheet pan for each evaluation Damp towel capable of covering the sheet pan Refrigerator capable of maintaining a temperature range of 38 to 42°F Dusting flour Rolling pin Bench brush Two 1/16-inch-diameter metal rods 24 inches long Two 3/8-inch-diameter metal rods 24 inches long One metal, round, sharp-edged, 3 3/8-inch-diameter pastry dough cutter One metal, round, sharp-edged, 2 3/8-inch-diameter pastry dough cutter Pastry brush Twelve 4-ounce, round, wide-mouth jars for each evaluation Bakery oven Tape measure • Formula: Ingredient
Grams
Bread flour
1248
Cake flour
227
Roll-in test fat
227
Salt
14
Pure cream of tartar
14
Cold water (40 to 55°F)
794
Whole eggs
227
Roll-in test fat
1248
Evaluation Stage Blending
Dough mixing Roll-in
• Procedure: 1. Dough mixing: −− Weigh the dry ingredients and dough test fat into the 12-quart mixing bowl. −− Blend 2 to 3 minutes at first speed until the fat is in pea-sized lumps. −− Add the water and whole eggs and mix 45 seconds at second speed. Stop the mixer and remove the bowl from the mixer.
254
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
2. Molding and resting: −− Remove the dough from the mixing bowl to a lightly floured sheet pan. −− Mold the dough into an oblong or rectangular shape about 4 inches thick. −− Cover the dough with a damp towel. −− Rest the dough for 30 minutes in the refrigerator. −− Remove the dough from the refrigerator. 3. Sheeting and fat spotting: −− Carefully roll out dough, using even pressure with a rolling pin to form a rectangular sheet about 1/2 inch thick. The sheet should be formed by rolling in two directions at right angles to form a rectangle of dough three times as long as it is wide. −− Spot the test roll-in fat in small blobs or chunks evenly over 2/3 of the dough surface, leaving the right 1/3 dough surface bare of fat. −− After all of the fat has been so distributed, fold the bare portion of the dough to the left so that it covers half of the fat-spotted dough. Then, fold the remaining fat-spotted dough surface to the right over the first folded dough. This forms five alternate layers of dough and fat. 4. First roll-in: −− Carefully roll out the laminated dough again, using even pressure with the rolling pin to form a rectangular sheet about 1/2 inch thick and about three times as long as it is wide. −− Refold the dough exactly as described above — right third over the middle third and then the left third over the first fold. −− Place the folded laminated dough, now with 15 layers, back onto the lightly floured sheet pan, cover with the damp cloth again to prevent crusting of the dough, and refrigerate for 30 minutes. 5. Additional roll-ins: −− Bring the dough from the refrigerator and repeat the procedure for the first roll-in. −− Repeat the roll-in procedure each 30 minutes until a total of five roll-ins have been completed to form 1215 alternate layers of dough and fat. −− After the fifth roll-in, refrigerate overnight on the floured pan covered with the damp cloth. 6. Patty shell make-up: −− Remove the chilled dough from the refrigerator, cut off 1/3 of the dough for make-up and return the remainder to the refrigerator. −− Cut off 1/3 of the make-up dough portion and roll out to a thickness of 1/16 inch, using the metal bars as guides to ensure the correct thickness. −− Cut 12 round pieces with the 3 3/8-inch cutter. Place the dough round pieces on a sheet pan lined with parchment, dock with a kitchen fork at least six times, and brush lightly with water. −− Roll remaining portion of the make-up dough to a thickness of 3/8 inch, using the appropriate metal guides. Cut one dozen 3 3/8-inch-diameter rounds; then, with the 2 3/8-inch smaller cutter, remove the center of each dough circle to form a ring. −− Carefully place a ring on each of the 1/16-inch dough pieces on the sheet pan. Be sure that no excess dusting flour adheres to either side of the rings.
Fats and Oils Analysis
255
−− Place a 4-ounce, straight-sided, wide-mouth jar inside each shell just before baking. Place another sheet pan on top of the jars to keep the jars upright during baking. −− Bake at 380°F for approximately 35 minutes until done. 7. Evaluation procedure: −− Determine the extent of puff or rise by measuring the height of five shells stacked carefully one upon the other. The minimum satisfactory performance is a height of 12 inches for five shells. −− Observe the amount of melted fat on the parchment on the sheet pan surface. −− Weigh the five shells measured for height. −− Compare the test roll-in fat results to test results obtained with a commercially accepted product included in the test series, when possible. Otherwise, compare the test product results to previously obtained results of satisfactory product tested previously.
256
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Nonstandardized Method 8.10 Deep-Fat Frying Test
• Definition: Measures the ability of a frying shortening or oil to resist hydrolysis, oxidation, and polymerization with continuous heating and scheduled food frying that causes foaming, off-flavors, smoking, darkening, gum development, and other thermal decomposition properties • Scope: Applicable to all frying shortenings and oils • Equipment: Smallest available commercial fryer and basket Thermometer with 0 to 500°F range and 2°F gradations Scale, graduated in grams, with scale pan and counter balance Fresh potatoes Potato peeler French-cut potato slicer Cloud point beaker, etched at 50-gram fat level Cork borer, 3/8-inch diameter Sharp knife Metal ruler with 1/8-inch divisions Ring stand Wire gauze Exhaust hood Refrigerator • Frying test procedure: 1. Boil-out fryers and baskets with a caustic cleaner, rinse with clear water, neutralize with a vinegar solution, and dry with paper toweling. 2. Inspect the fryer kettle, heating element, and thermal coupling for wear spots that would allow brass or copper to contact the frying media. Do not use any equipment that could influence the results of the test. 3. Scale 14 pounds or 6350 grams of the test frying shortening or oil into the frying kettle. 4. Start the actual frying test at the beginning of a day. Preheat and adjust the frying shortening or oil temperature to 360°F (± 10°F). The frying media should now be under continuous heat until the completion of the test, unless the test is interrupted for the weekend. The first frying should be performed as soon as the fryers have been adjusted to frying temperature. 5. Peel and French cut only enough fresh potatoes for a single day’s frying, 1.5 pounds per fryer. Soak potatoes in cold water to remove the surface starch. Before each frying remove the excess water by draining and blotting the potatoes between cloths before weighing. Every 24 hours, fry 8 ounces of the French-cut potatoes in each fryer for 7 minutes, three times each 3 hours over a 9-hour period. 6. At the completion of each 24-hour period, measure the foam height and determine the Lovibond red color, free fatty acid, and iodine value for each frying fat in test.
Fats and Oils Analysis
7. The French fries should be observed and flavored after each frying to determine and record any off-flavors or appearance problems contributed by the frying fat. 8. Observe and record the frying fat appearance during each frying. The appearance should be noted after 1 1/2 minutes of frying to allow the moisture bubbles from the French fries to dissipate. The frying fat color, smoking or lack of it, odor, gumming on the kettle, foaming tendencies, and any other changes should all be recorded. 9. The frying test is terminated when persistent foam is observed and confirmed by a foam test measurement of at least 1 inch. The foaming tendencies descriptions and rating scale are as follows:
Foam Description
257
Observed Foaming Tendencies
Foam Test (inches)
None
Normal frying
Trace
First indication of foam
None 1/8
Slight
Increase of foam severity
1/4
Definite
Definite pockets of foam
1/2
Persistent
Persistent foam until food is removed
1
• Foam test procedure: 1. Pour 50 grams of test frying fat into the cloud point beaker. 2. Heat to 392°F with the Bunsen burner. 3. Remove the heat source. 4. Immediately drop six precut potato pieces measuring 3/8 inch in diameter by 1/2 inch in length into the heated fat. 5. Record the foam height after 1 1/2 minutes to allow the moisture bubbles to dissipate. The foam height is determined by measuring the actual height of the foam above the surface of the fat less 1/4 inch to allow for the displacement of the potato pieces. • Frying stability: Frying life determinations are calculated by summing the number of elapsed hours required to reach the endpoint criteria for each stability measurement and then dividing the total by the number of quality factors. For example: Overall frying stability Elapsed hours requirred to reach persistent foam + 1.0% FFA + 6.0 red color (1-inch column) Number of quality factors (in this case 3)
258
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Nonstandardized Method 8.11 Ice Cream Bar Coating Test • Definition: Measures the performance of enrobing fats in ice cream bar coatings • Scope: Applicable for all enrobing fats designed for use in ice cream bar coatings • Equipment: Scale, graduated in grams, with weighing pan and counter balance Sifter Experimental confectionery fat coating machine or household kitchen mixer, beaters, small mixing bowl, and heating device capable of holding temperatures of 125 and 105°F Stopwatch Thermometer with 0 to 200°F range Rectangular plastic strip, approximately 0.5-mm thick Freezer capable of –10°F Uncoated ice cream bars • Formula: Ingredients
Grams
%
Test enrobing fat
342
57.0
10X powdered sugar
120
20.0
Nonfat milk solids
28
4.7
Chocolate liquor
108
18.0
Lecithin
2
0.3
• Procedure: 1. Sift and weigh all of the dry ingredients into the mixing bowl. 2. Add the lecithin to 125°F (± 5°F) melted fat and stir to incorporate. 3. Add approximately one third of the melted fat to the dry ingredients and mix at a slow speed to make a paste. 4. Add the remaining melted fat and mix thoroughly. 5. Attain and hold the coating at 105°F (± 1°F) for 30 minutes. 6. Quickly dip the frozen ice bar into the liquid coating, allowing it to remain in the coating for a maximum of only 3 seconds. 7. Start the stopwatch timer as soon as the bar is removed from the liquid coating. 8. Hold the bar at a 45° angle and allow to drain. 9. As soon as no further coating is dripping from the bar and the coating has flashed from a high, wet gloss to a dull, dry sheen, record the time, to the nearest second, as the drying time. 10. Immediately start scratching the coated surface with a corner of the rectangular plastic piece, using about 2-inch strokes and moderate pressure. When the plastic stops digging through the coating and starts making fine shavings of the coating, record the total elapsed time, to the nearest second, as the hardening time. 11. Bite into the coated bar at regular intervals. When the coating audibly snaps, record the total elapsed time, to the nearest second, as the brittleness time. 12. Make duplicate determinations of drying, hardening, and brittleness times.
Fats and Oils Analysis
259
Nonstandardized Method 8.12 Sandwich Cookie Filler Shortening Evaluation • Definition: Uniform test procedure designed to evaluate cookie filler plasticized shortening performance for eating quality, consistency, aeration, potential machinability, and aged stability • Scope: Applicable to all plasticized sandwich cookie or wafer filler shortenings • Equipment: C-100 Hobart mixer equipped with 3-quart bowl and paddle Scale, graduated in grams Scale pan with counter balance Hand sifter Thermometer with 0 to 120°F range Specific gravity cup with 200-milliliter capacity and calibrated Stainless steel spatula with 6-inch blade Two 8-ounce jars with metal lids 48 plain sandwich cookie halves Two plastic bags with ties 100°F constant-temperature cabinet • Test formula: Ingredients
Grams
Use Temperature (°F)
Shortening
375
70–78
Corn sugar
284
70–78
6X powdered sugar
476
70–78
• Procedure: 1. Sift corn sugar and powdered sugar together. 2. Scale shortening into 3-quart bowl and mix for 1/2 minute at first speed. Stop mixer, scrape bowl and paddle. 3. Add half of presifted sugars to the 3-quart bowl containing the shortening. Mix 1/2 minute at first speed. Stop mixer, add remaining presifted sugars, and mix 1/2 minute at first speed. Stop mixer, scrape bowl and paddle. 4. Mix 5 minutes at second speed. Stop mixer, and record specific gravity and temperature. Scrape bowl and paddle. 5. Mix 5 minutes at second speed. Stop mixer and record specific gravity and temperature. Evaluate filling appearance and consistency. Note: Finished filler temperature should be 90°F (± 3°F). 6. Fill two 8-ounce jars with 100 grams of filler each; store one jar at room temperature (75°F (± 2°F)) and the other at 100°F. 7. Prepare 24 sandwich cookies with 4 grams of filler for each cookie. 8. Place 12 cookies each in two plastic bags with ties; store one bag at room temperature (75°F (± 2°F)) and the other at l00°F. 9. Evaluate fillings and cookies three times each week for consistency, flavor, and odor.
260
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
REFERENCES
1. American Oil and Chemists’ Society, The Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 5th ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2005. 2. Farr, W.E., Refining of fats and oils, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E., and Wan, P.E., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 142–145. 3. Mertens, W.G., Fat melting point determinations: A review, JAOCS, 50, 115–118, 1983. 4. Sleeter, R.T., Instrumental analytical methods for edible oil processing: Present and future, JAOCS, 60, 343–349, 1983. 5. Timms, R.E., SFI or SFC? Why the difference? INFORM, 16, 74–75, 2005. 6. Erickson, D.R., Finished-product testing, JAOCS, 44, 536A–538A, 1967. 7. Clapper, G., Uniform methods committee update, INFORM, 17, 459, 2006. 8. Mehlenbacher, V.C., Newer analytical methods for the fat and oil industry, JAOCS, 37, 615, 1960. 9. Wan, P. J., Properties of Fats and Oils, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., O’Brien, R. D., Farr, W. E., and Wan, P. J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, p. 46, 2000. 10. Stauffer, C.E., Fats & Oils, Eagan Press, St. Paul, MN, 133–134, 1996. 11. Miller, W.J. et al., The measurement of fatty solids by differential scanning calorimetry, JAOCS, 46, 341–343, 1969. 12. Bentz, A.P. and Breidenbach, B.G., Evaluation of the differential scanning calorimetric method for fat solids, JAOCS, 46, 60–63, 1969. 13. O’Brien, R.D., Formulation-single feedstock situation, in Hydrogenation: Proceedings of an AOCS Colloquium, Hastert, R., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1987, p. 156. 14. Bailey, A.E., Melting and Solidification of Fats, Interscience, New York, 1950, pp. 300–308. 15. Cox, R. et al., Determination of iodine value with a Fourier transform-near infraredbased global collaboration using disposable vials: An international collaborative study, JAOCS, 77, 1229–1234, 2000. 16. Li, H. et al., Discrimination of edible oil products and quantitive determination of their iodine value by Fourier transform near-infrared spectroscopy, JAOCS, 77, 29–36, 2000. 17. Verleyen, T. et al., Influence of triacylglycerol characteristics on the determination of free fatty acids in vegetable oils by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, JAOCS, 78, 981–984, 2001. 18. Kyriakidis, N.B. and Katsiloulis, T., Calculation of iodine value from measurements of fatty acid methyl esters of some oils: Comparison with the relevant American Oil Chemists’ Society method, JAOCS, 77, 1235–1238, 2000. 19. Zeleny, L. and Coleman, D.A., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. 554, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1937. 20. Zeleny, L. and Neustadt, M.H., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. 748, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1940. 21. Perkins, E., Physical properties of soybeans, in Practical Handbook of Soybean Processing and Utilization, Erickson, D. R., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1995, pp. 31–32. 22. Wang, T., Soybean oil, in Vegetable Oils in Food Technology Composition, Properties and Uses, Gunstone, F.D., Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2002, p. 42. 23. Mossoba, M., Determination of trans fats by gas chromatography and infrared methods, in Trans Fats Alternatives, Kodali, D. and List, G.R., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2005, pp. 51–55.
Fats and Oils Analysis
261
24. Czajkowski, C., Determinating fatty acid composition, INFORM, 7, 436–439, 1996. 25. Azizian, H. and Kramer, J.A., A non-invasive analytical tool for many applications, INFORM, 16, 656–657, 2005. 26. Ham, B. et al., Calculating the iodine value for marine oils from fatty acid profiles, JAOCS, 10, 1445–1446, 1998. 27. Weiss, T.J., Food Oils and Their Uses, 2nd ed., AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1983, pp. 19–21. 28. Rilsom, T. and Hoffmeyer, L., High performance liquid chromatography analysis of emulsifiers. 1. Quantitative determinations of mono– and diacylglycerols of saturated fatty acids, JAOCS, 55, 649–652, 1978. 29. Lauridsen, J.B., Food emulsifiers, surface activity, edibility, manufacture, composition, and application, JAOCS, 53, 400–407, 1976. 30. Sleeter, R.T., Effects of processing on quality of soybean oil, JAOCS, 58, 242, 1981. 31. Evans, C.D., Flavor evaluation of fats and oils, JAOCS, 32, 596, 1955. 32. Hillyer, C.D., Can we taste fat? INFORM, 17, 128, 2006. 33. Kramer, A. and Twigg, B.A., Quality Control for the Food Industry, AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1970, pp. 108–115. 34. White, P.J., Flavor quality of fats and oils, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E., and Wan, P.E., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 358–360, 362–364. 35. Williams, J.L. and Applewhite, T.H., Correlation of the flavor scores of vegetable oils with volatile profile data, JAOCS, 54, 461, 1977. 36. Min, D.B., Analysis of flavor qualities of vegetable oils by gas chromatography, JAOCS, 60, 544–545, 1983. 37. Lezerovich, A., Determination of peroxide value by conventional difference and difference-derivative spectrophotometry, JAOCS, 62, 1495, 1985. 38. Sessa, D.J. and Rakis, J.J., Lipid-derived flavors of legume protein products, JAOCS, 54, 468, 1977. 39. Mag, T K., Bleaching: Theory and practice, in Edible Fats and Oils Processing: Basic Principals and Modern Practices: World Conference Proceedings, D.R. Erickson, Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1990, p.111. 40. Mehlenbacher, V.C., A study of methods of accelerating the swift stability test, JAOCS, 19, 137–139, 1942. 41. Dugan, L., Stability and rancidity, JAOCS, 32, 605–608, 1955. 42. Hill, S.E., Comparisons, measuring oxidative stability, INFORM, 5, 104–109, 1994. 43. de Man, J.M. and de Man, L., Automated AOM test for fat stability, JAOCS, 61, 534–536, 1984. 44. Chamberlin, G.J., Comments on the use of the Lovibond system, JAOCS, 45, 711, 1968. 45. Belbin, A.A., Color in oils, INFORM, 4, 648–654, 1993. 46. Anon., Color methodology, INFORM, 4, 706–707, 1993. 47. James, E.M., The determination of refining loss, JAOCS, 32, 581–587, 1955. 48. Linteris, L. and Handschumaker, E., Investigation of methods for determining the refining efficiency of crude oils, JAOCS, 27, 260–263, 1950. 49. Pyler, E.J., Baking Science and Technology, Siebel Publishing Company, Chicago, IL, 1952, p. 568.
Chapter 4
Fats and Oils Formulation
4.1 INTRODUCTION Fats and oils play a significant role in the formulation and performance of a variety of prepared foods. Most of America’s favorite foods could not be prepared without fats and oils. This would include pan and deep-fat fried foods, baked products, spoonable and pourable salad dressings, nondairy products, whipped toppings, confectionery products, pastries, peanut butter, table spreads, and so on, all of which possess desirable properties attributable to the fats and oils ingredients in the formulation. Fats and oils affect the structure, stability, flavor, storage quality, eating characteristics, and eye appeal of the foods prepared. To accomplish the desired performance, the developer must recognize that most applications require a fat or oil product with different physical and organoleptic properties. The development of fats and oils products for food applications is dependent on many interlaced factors. These factors may differ from customer to customer depending on the equipment used, processing limitations, product preference, customer base, and many other factors. Tailored fats and oils products are now being designed to satisfy these individual specific requirements as well as to provide products with a broad general appeal. The design criteria for a general-purpose product must be of a broader nature than those for a specific product and process. The important attributes of a formulated fat or oil in a food product can vary considerably. In some food items, the flavor contribution of the shortening is of minor importance; however, it does contribute a beneficial effect to the eating quality of the finished product. This fact has been illustrated by the recent introductions of fat-free products. Most of these products lack the eating characteristics contributed by fats and oils. In many products, such as cakes, pie crusts, icings, cookies, and certain pastries, processed fats and oils are major contributors to the characteristic structure and eating character, in addition to having other significant effects on the quality of the finished product. A thorough understanding of the functions and properties of the various fats and oils products is the basic key to formulation for the desired performance attributes. 263
264
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Fats and oils are very versatile raw materials for which processing methods have been developed to make them even more useful to the food industry, and analytical chemists have devised methods to qualify the product produced. Satisfactory performance of fats and oils products is dependent on several important elements that determine suitability. Fats and oils formulators must identify the important attributes and effectively utilize the different functional properties of the available processed fats and oils to satisfy the prepared foods requirements. Successful production of these products relies on the manipulation of the fat blend to produce suitable physical properties and prevent undesirable changes during and after processing. Important performance characteristics of fats and oils that must be considered for any product formulation include: • Flavor: Generally, the flavor of processed fats and oils products should be completely bland so the flavor of the food product is enhanced rather than the fat or oil contributing a flavor. In some specific cases, a typical flavor, such as lard or butter, is desirable for a particular application; however, the reverted or oxidized flavors and odors of most fats and oils are objectionable. • Flavor stability: The bland or typical flavor must be stable throughout the shelf life plus the use life of the prepared food product. The fat or oil product must possess the identified degree of resistance to both oxidative and lipolytic flavor degradation. • Physical characteristics: Each fat and oil has a characteristic composition and distribution of fatty acids. The physical, functional, and organoleptic properties of fats and oils are, in part, a function of the fatty acid composition, but also are governed by the fatty acid distribution in the triglyceride composing the raw materials. The consistency, plasticity, emulsification, creaming properties, spreadability, other properties of the fats and oils, and the prepared foods produced are all affected by the unsaturation and saturation of the fatty acids and their position in the triglyceride that control melting rate and range. • Crystal habit: Fats and oils are polymorphic, which means that with cooling a series of increasingly organized crystal changes occur until a final stable crystal form is achieved. The crystal types formed define the textural and functional characteristics of most fat-based products. Many prepared foods are mixtures of ingredients held in a matrix of solid fat. The fat is the major functional ingredient and binds the other ingredients together; at the same time, it imparts texture and mouth feel to the product while affecting flavor release and dispersion in the mouth of the solid materials at a controlled rate. • Nutritional concerns: Fats and oils are recognized as important nutrients for both humans and animals because they provide a concentrated source of energy, contain essential fatty acids, and serve as carriers for fat-soluble vitamins; however, research studies have indicated a possible relationship between fats and the incidence of coronary heart disease. Diet modifications that include reductions in fat consumption, saturated fats, cholesterol, and trans-isomers while increasing omega-3 fatty acids have been proposed. • Additives: In addition to emulsifiers, a number of other chemical compounds provide a specific function for edible fats and oils products. The additive categories are antioxidants, antifoamers, metal inactivators, colorants, flavors, crystal inhibitors, preservatives, vitamins, sterol/stanol esters, and emulsifiers.
Fats and Oils Formulation
265
Current chemical and physical processing techniques provide the processor with the capability of modifying one or more fats and oils properties. It is possible to produce fats and oils products that have little resemblance to the natural fats and oils and provide the ability to formulate custom products to suit a particular product or process. Further, the processing techniques provide the processor with a wider range of alternative raw material sources to improve commercial viability. Some of the objectives for applying the available modification or processing techniques include:
1. Production of a fat or oil product to meet certain performance characteristics not possible with natural source oil and fat products 2. Potential utilization of a more economic feedstock to duplicate functionality of a more expensive alternative 3. Extended oxidative stability 4. Palatability improvement 5. Modification of the crystallization behavior 6. Development of more nutritionally acceptable products, for example, reduce saturates and trans acids while increasing omega-3 polyunsaturates
4.2 OILS AND FATS CHARACTERISTICS Fats and oils consist of a mixture of glycerol esters of fatty acids, called triglycerides, in concentrations peculiar to each fat or oil source. Fatty acids are responsible for the different properties of the triglycerides; the glycerol component is identical for every triglyceride. Several aspects can differentiate the fatty acid components: (1) the carbon chain length, (2) the number of double bonds, (3) the location of the double bonds, (4) the configuration of the hydrogen atoms attached to the carbon atoms joined by the double bond, cis or trans, and (5) the position of the fatty acids regarding the glycerol. Fatty acids found in food lipids vary in carbon chain length from 4 to 24 carbon atoms. Vegetable oils typically are composed of fatty acids with even numbered carbon chains; animal fats and marine oils contain some odd numbered chain fatty acids in addition to the even numbered chains. The effects of chain length, unsaturation, and geometric isomerism on the fatty acids melting point are shown in Table 4.1.1-4 Aside from their nutritional role in the diet, the various fatty acids are purported to have different roles in regard to their health effects.5 Fatty acids occurring in edible oils are broadly classified as saturated or unsaturated. 4.2.1 Saturated Fatty Acids The fatty acids with two hydrogen atoms bonded to each carbon atom in the chain are saturated, that is, they contain no double bonds between carbons. Saturated fatty acids generally vary in chain length from 4 to 24 carbons atoms. Saturated fatty acids, with some exceptions, have straight, even numbered carbon chains. They are the least reactive and have a higher melting point than unsaturated fatty acids of the same chain length due to the dense packing of the unbranched chain structure
266
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 4.1 Fatty Acid Nomenclature and Melting Points Fatty Acid:
Omega
Melting Point
Common Name
Symbol
Acetic
C-2:0
Designation —
ethanoic
Systematic Name
°F
°C
61.9
16.6
Butyric
C-4:0
—
Caproic
C-6:0
—
butanoic
17.6
–8.0
hexanoic
25.9
Caprylic
C-8:0
–3.4
—
octanoic
62.1
Capric
16.7
C-10:0
—
decanoic
88.9
31.6
Lauric
C-12:0
—
dodecanoic
Myristic
C-14:0
—
tetradecanoic
Myristoleic
C-14:1
n-5c
Pentadecylic
C-15:0
—
Palmitic
C-16:0
—
Palmitoleic
C-16:1
n-7c
Palmitelaidic
C-16:1
n-7t
Margaric
C-17:0
—
Margaroleic
C-17:1
n-8c
Stearic
C-18:0
—
Petroselinic
C-18:1
n-12c
Oleic
C-18:1
n-9c
Elaidic
C-18:1
n-9t
Vaccenic
C-18:1
Linoleic
C-18:2
Linoleladic
C-18:2
γ-Linolenic
111.6
44.2
129.9
54.4
23.9
–4.5
pentadecanoic
125.8
52.1
hexadecanoic
145.2
62.9
cis-9-hexadecenoic
31.1
–0.5
trans-9-hexadecenoic
87.8
31.0
heptadecanoic
142.3
61.3
cis-9-heptadecenoic
135.5
57.5
octadecanoic
157.3
69.6
cis-6-octadecenoic
86.0
30.0
cis-9-octecenoic
56.1
13.4
trans-9-octecenoic
110.7
43.7
n-7t
trans-11-octadecenoic
111.2
44.0
n-6c
cis-9,12-octadecenoic
20.3
–6.5
n-6t
trans-9,12-octadecenoic
82.4
28.0
C-18:3
n-6c
cis-6,9,12 octadecatrienoic
12.2
–11.0
α-Linolenic
C-18:3
n-3c
cis-9,12,15-octadecatetraenoic
8.6
–13.0
α-Eleostearic
C-18:3
n-3t
cis-9,trans-12,15-octadecatetraenoic
120.2
49.0
β-Elosstearic
C-18:3
n-3t
trans-9,12,15-octadecatetraenoic
159.8
71.0
Stearidonic
C-18:4
n-3c
cis-6,9,12,15-octadecatetraenoic
Arachidic
C-20:0
—
167.5
75.3
Gadoleic
C-20:1
n-11c
cis-9, eicosenoic
76.1
24.5
dihomo-γ-linolenic
C-20:3
n-6c
cis-8,11,14-eicosatrienoic
Arachidonic
C-20:4
n-6c
cis-5,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic
–57.1
–49.5
EPA
C-20:5
n-3c
cis-5,8,11,14,17-eicosapentaenoic
–64.3
–53.5
Behenic
C-22:0
—
docosanoic
175.8
79.9
Erucic
C-22:1
n-9c
cis-13-docosenoic
92.3
33.5
Clupanodonic
C-22-5
n-3c
cis-7,10,13,16,19-docosapentaenoic
–108.4
–78.0
DHA
C-22:6
n-3c
cis-4,7,10,13,16,19-docosahexaenoic
Lignoceric
C-24:0
—
183.6
84.2
cis-9-tetradecenoic
eicosanoic
tetracosanoic
Notes: c = cis; t = trans; n = indicates the first double bond counting from the methyl end of the molecule.
Fats and Oils Formulation
267
into the crystal lattice. The fatty acids identified with a 0 values for double bonds in Table 4.1 are saturated. This table shows that the melting point of the saturated fatty acids increase as the chain lengthens. The melting point of a lipid is dependent on both the degree of unsaturation and the chain length. Vegetable oils’ saturated fatty acids are predominately even numbered carbon atoms ranging from 4 to 24. Animal fats and marine oils also contain predominately even numbered carbon chains with the addition of uneven chains containing 15 and 17 carbon atoms. This characteristic can be an identification aid for the presence of these fats and oils in a blend. Saturated fatty acids have been identified as one of the culprits in the American diet that raises the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level. The 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommended that saturated fatty acids should be limited to 10% of total calories for healthy individuals and a further reduction to 7% of total calories for individuals at risk for heart disease. However, most dietitians agree that not all saturated fatty acids are unhealthy. The saturated fatty acids are not a single family, but are comprised of three subgroups: short, medium, and long-chain fatty acids:6 4.2.1.1 Short-Chain Fatty Acids The saturated fatty acids with 2 to 6 carbon atoms are in this subgroup: acetic (C2H4O2), butyric (C4H8O2), and caproic (C6H12O2), This subgroup of fatty acids has the least number of carbon atoms of all the fatty acids found in natural fats and oils. Cow’s milk contains about 4% butyric fatty acid, which contributes to the characteristic flavor of butter.7 Caproic and caprylic are also found in butter oil as well as the tropical oils: coconut and palm kernel oils. These short-chain fatty acids have little or no effect on cholesterol, are a liquid at room temperature, and vaporize readily at high temperatures. 4.2.1.2 Medium-Chain Fatty Acids Saturated fatty acids with 8 to 12 carbon atoms are classified as medium-chain fatty acids: caprylic, (C8H16O2), capric (C10H20O2), and lauric (C12H24O2). The transport and metabolism of the medium-chain are unique compared to the longer chain fatty acids. Unlike long-chain fatty acids, medium-chain fatty acids are thought to be directed to the liver and burned as energy rather than being stored in the body as fat. They provide 8.3 calories/gram compared with 9.2 for the other fatty acids. Laboratory animal and human research revealed that medium-chain fatty acids act more like carbohydrates than saturates, that is, they do not raise serum cholesterol levels. Esters of medium-chain fatty acids with glycerol are critical ingredients in sports foods, clinical nutrition, and infant formulations.8-10 • Lauric fatty acid, C12H24O2, is one of the three most widely distributed saturated fatty acid found in nature; the other two are palmitic and stearic.7 Lauric fatty acid acquired its trivial name from a little known seed oil, lauraceae. The richest common sources for lauric fatty acid are coconut and palm kernel oils, with levels of 40 to 50%. As a result of lauric and medium-chain fatty acids, these tropical oils
268
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
have a low melting point combined with an extremely steep solid fat index (SFI) or solid fat content (SFC) curve to provide a sharp melting behavior, which produces an impression of coolness to the palate. Lauric fatty acid has the highest cholesterol raising effect of all the fatty acids, but most of the rise is in high-density lipoprotein (HDL), the good cholesterol. As a result, lauric fatty acid has a more favorable effect on the total to HDL cholesterol ratio than any other fatty acid, either saturated or unsaturated.11
4.2.1.3 Long-Chain Fatty Acids Saturated fatty acids with 14 to 24 carbon atoms are classified as long-chain fatty acids. The most notable long-chain saturates are those within the 14 to 18 carbon atom range. Saturated fatty acids with carbon chains longer than those of stearic (C-18:0) are major components of only a few fat and oil sources. Arachidic (C-20:0), behenic (C-22:0), and lignoceric (C-24:0) are minor components of peanut oil for a total content of 5 to 8% of C-20 and higher fatty acids. Rapeseed oil contains ± 41% erucic, a monounsaturated fatty acid that can be hydrogenated to behenic fatty acid. • Myristic fatty acid, C14H28O2, a minor constituent of most fats and oils, is the saturated fatty acid having the greatest effect on serum cholesterol levels.12 Coconut, palm kernel, and milk fat contain appreciable amounts of myristic fatty acid, typically, 18.1, 16.2, and 10.8, respectively. Animal fats also contain myristic, but at lower levels, typically, 3.2% for tallow and 1.5% for lard. • Palmitic fatty acid, C16H32O2, is the most widely occurring saturated fatty acid and is present in every commercially processed food fat in the world. Nutritionally, palmitic has been found to be more hypercholesterolemic than lauric, but less so than myristic fatty acid.12 Studies have shown that palmitic fatty acid increases LDL cholesterol levels in parallel with total cholesterol concentrations when substituted for carbohydrates or monounsaturates in the diet. Palmitic fatty acid is the major saturated fatty acid in animal fats and occurs in all vegetable oils. Fat and oil sources with relatively high palmitic (C-16:0) fatty acid contents include palm oil (~44%), lard (~26%), tallow (~24%), and cottonseed oil (~21.5%). Nutritional studies have shown that palm oil is an acceptable alternative for partially hydrogenated oil in terms of the effect on total and HDL cholesterol.11 A high palmitic fatty acid content usually indicates that the fat or oil product will crystallize in the ß´ form, which is desirable for plasticity, smooth texture, aeration, and creaming properties; however, the stabilization effect of palmitic fatty acid is also related to it triglyceride position. Lard has a predominately asymmetric triglyceride structure with palmitic in the sn-2 position to produce a ß-crystal habit. The crystal habit of lard can be changed to ß´ by interesterification to randomize the fatty acids and improve the ration of symmetric triglycerides. • Stearic fatty acid, C18H36O2, is a saturated fatty acid that has different biological effects than other saturated fatty acids. Nutritionally, a meta-analysis of 35 studies suggests that stearic fatty acid has a minimal effect on LDL cholesterol and no effect on HDL cholesterol.11 Stearic fatty acid may be more rapidly converted to oleic fatty acid than are other saturates.7 However, another study showed that stearic fatty acid might increase the risk of cardiovascular disease through mechanisms other than cholesterol concentrations, such as an increase in fibrinogen
Fats and Oils Formulation
269
concentration. Stearic is present in most fats and oils, but at a significant level in only a few natural fats and oils. Cocoa butter (~34%), tallow (~13.5%), and butter (~12.1%) have the highest stearic fatty acid contents. In vegetable oils, a high level of stearic fatty acid is normally the result of hydrogenation of oils high in 18-carbon unsaturates.12a
4.2.2 Unsaturated Fatty Acids The fatty acids that contain double bonds between the carbon atoms are termed unsaturated. As many as seven double bonds have been reported; fatty acids with an excess of three double bonds are most likely of aquatic origin. Those containing 1, 2, and 3 double bonds and 18 carbon atoms are the most important unsaturated fatty acids of vegetable and land animal origin. Those with 4 or more double bonds and 20 to 24 carbon atoms are found principally in marine oils. Normal double bonds in the cis form cause a bend in the carbon chain, which restricts the freedom of the fatty acid. This bend becomes more pronounced as the number of double bonds increase. The kinks in the unsaturated carbon chains prevent them from packing well into the crystal lattice. This limits the ability of the fatty acids to closely pack and, therefore, the density and melting characteristics. Table 4.1 confirms that the unsaturated fatty acid melting points decrease as the double bonds increase. The presence of double bonds also makes the unsaturated fatty acids more chemically reactive than the saturated fatty acids and this activity increases as the number of double bonds increase. The notable reactions are oxidation, polymerization, and hydrogenation. The subgroups for the unsaturated fatty acids are monounsaturated, omega-6 polyunsaturated, and omega-3 polyunsaturated. The terms monounsaturated and polyunsaturated indicate the number of double bonds (the prefix mono means one and poly denotes two or more). 4.2.2.1 Monounsaturated Fatty Acids Monounsaturated fatty acids have only one double bond. This fatty acid class is the least reactive of the unsaturated fatty acids. Of the monounsaturated fatty acids, oleic and palmitoleic are the most widely distributed and oleic is considered the most important. Unlike oleic, a number of naturally occurring monounsaturated fatty acids do not have their double bonds at the 9 position. These fatty acids are minor components of most of the fat or oil in which they occur, with the exception of petroselinic (~75% in parsley seed oil) and erucic (~40% in rapeseed oil). The 2005 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee advised that the available nutritional evidence demonstrated that (1) compared to a high carbohydrate diet, a diet with ~60% of fat calories from monounsaturates decreased triglycerides and increased HDL cholesterol concentrations; and (2) replacing saturated with monounsaturated fatty acids was found to reduce total and LDL cholesterol values. • Oleic fatty acid, C18H34O2, is the most widely distributed natural fatty acid. It is found in practically every vegetable oil and animal fat and few contain less than
270
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
10%. High-oleic oils normally have positive health aspects because of their low saturated fatty acid levels, minimal trans-isomer contents, and the potential to decrease blood triglycerides, LDL and total cholesterol values, and a high oxidative stability. Olive oil is a very flavor-stable oil because of the high oleic fatty acid content (~80%). Peanut oil, lard, tallow, and palm oils also have high oleic fatty acid contents — typically, 46.7, 43.9, and 42.5%, respectively. Plant breeding to modify the genetics has commercialized seed oil plants with high oleic fatty acid contents, including canola oil (~60.9%), NuSun® oil (~60.4%), high-oleic sunflower oil (~81.3%), and high-oleic safflower oil (~81.5%). Liquid oils with high-oleic fatty acid contents have exhibited good oxidative and frying stabilities; however, it has been reported that oils with more than 65% oleic fatty acid lose some of the characteristic fried-food flavor.13 • Erucic fatty acid, C22H42O2,, is found in plants of the mustard seed family and in some marine animal oils. It is the major fatty acid in high-erucic rapeseed oil, typically ~41%. Due to the possible physiopathological harmfulness of high-erucic fatty acid in the human diet, new mustard seed varieties have been developed and are currently available as canola oil. Canola oil must not exceed a maximum erucic fatty acid content of 2.0% by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations. Oils with high-erucic fatty acid contents are not permitted in U.S. foods by regulation. High-erucic rapeseed oil can be utilized only if it has been hydrogenated to a low iodine value to convert the erucic fatty acid (C-22:1) to behenic(C-22:0) fatty acid.
4.2.2.2 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Polyunsaturated fatty acids have two or more double bonds. Chemically reactivity increases as the number of double bonds increase. Polyunsaturated fatty acids with two to six double bonds are of considerable interest nutritionally. Vegetable oils are the principal source of the two essential fatty acids: linoleic and linolenic. Arachidonic fatty acid is found in small amounts in lard, which also contains ~10% linoleic fatty acid. Marine oils contain large quantities of a variety of long-chain unsaturated fatty acids with three or more double bonds. Human life is dependent on the essential fatty acids at every stage, even before birth. They are found in the membrane of every cell in the body and help to regulate all biological functions, including those of the cardiovascular, reproductive, immune, and nervous systems. Researchers initially found that these fatty acids were essential to normal growth in young children and animals and deemed them essential fatty acids. They were found necessary for stimulating skin and hair growth, maintaining bone health, regulating metabolism, and maintaining reproductive capability. Further research indicated that these fatty acids can also help prevent heart disease and arthritis and appear to be important for awareness and behavior functions of the brain.14 The essential fatty acids are linoleic, C18H32O2, and linolenic, C18H30O2. These essential fatty acids must be obtained from food because the human body lacks the enzymes required for their production. However, our bodies do possess the enzymes necessary to convert linoleic (C-18:2) and linolenic (C-18:3) fatty acids to longer chain and more unsaturated fatty acids. Therefore, these two fatty acids form the
Fats and Oils Formulation
271
starting point for the creation of two physiological families: omega-3 and omega6. The Greek letter omega is used to designate the terminal carbon atom farthest removed from the terminal carboxyl group and the Arabic number signifies the location of the first double bond in the carbon chain counting from the omega end of the carbon chain. This nomenclature was introduced by biochemists; the systematic nomenclature counts from the opposite end of the molecule or from the terminal carboxyl group. Polyunsaturated fatty acids with the first double bond in the omega-3 and omega-6 positions are listed in the table below and compared to the systematic designation for each.4 Omega Family
Systematic Name
Common Name
Symbol
omega-3
cis-9,12,15-octadecatetraenoic
α-linolenic
omega-3
cis-6,9,12,15-octadecatetraenoic
stearidonic
C-18:4
omega-3
cis-5,8,11,14,17-eicosapentaenoic
EPA
C-20:5
omega-3
cis-7,10,13,16,19-docaosapentaenoic
clupanodonic
C-22:5
omega-3
cis-4,7,10,13,16,19-docsahexaenoic
DHA
C-22:6
omega-6
cis-9,12-octadecenoic
linoleic
C-18:2
omega-6
cis-6,9,12-octadecatrienoic
γ-linolenic
C-18:3
omega-6
cis-8,11,14-eicosatrienoic
dihomo-γ-linolenic
C-20:3
omega-6
cis-5,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic
arachidonic
C-20:4
C-18:3
• Omega-3 Fatty Acid Family: The omega-3 fatty acids have 3, 4, 5, or 6 double bonds in a carbon chain of 18, 20, or 22 carbon atoms. As with virtually all naturally produced fatty acids, the double bonds of omega-3 are in the cis configuration. A three dimensional (3D)-structure results from the cis configuration and the separation of each double bond with a methylene group. The carbon chain changes direction with each double bond so the structure is helically twisted instead of a straight chain, as is seen in saturated fatty acids. There are three major types of omega-3 fatty acids ingested in foods and used by the human body: α-linolenic fatty acid (C-18:3), eicosapentaenoic fatty acid (C-20:5), and docosahexaenoic fatty acid (C-22:6). α-linolenic is found mainly in green plants and is more readily available from commercial edible oils than the other two fatty acids. However, the longchain omega-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic (DHA) are considered more valuable as these are the forms the body requires. In theory, humans are able to synthesize the long-chain omega-3 fatty acids from α-linolenic, but in practice this process is slow and inefficient, thus scientists have concluded that long-chain omega-3 fatty acids should be included in the diet.15 Collectively, evidence shows that the consumption of α-linolenic fatty acid reduces all-cause mortality and various cardiovascular disease events, but, the evidence is strongest for diets containing EPA (C-20:5) and DHA (C-22:6) fatty acids. Stearidonic fatty acid (C-18:4) acts like EPA (C-20:5) in the human body. One less double bond affords stearidonic a potentially better oxidative stability than EPA fatty acid.16 • Omega-6 Fatty Acid Family: The omega-6 fatty acids have 2, 3, or 4 double bonds in a carbon chain of 18, 20, or 22 carbon atoms. Like the omega-3 fatty acids, a
272
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
3D-structure results from the cis configuration and the separation of the double bonds by a methylene group. Linoleic fatty acid (C-18:2) is the principal omega-6 essential fatty acid. Upon ingestion, the human body uses various desaturase and elongase enzymes to create downstream metabolities γ-linolenic (C-18:3), dihomoγ-linolenic (C-20:3), and arachidonic (C-20:4) fatty acids.17 Many of the vegetable oils available on a commercial scale are rich in linoleic fatty acid; oils with an animal origin contain linoleic and arachidonic fatty acids. A lack of dietary omega-6 fatty acids is characterized by rough, scaly skin, and dermatitis. Nutritional studies have indicated that aging, stress, poor diet, and multiple disease conditions interfere with γ-linolenic (C-18:3) formation, reducing its accumulation and desirable metabolities, such as dihomo-γ-linolenic fatty acid (C-20:3). GLA (γ-linolenic) is the first metabolite formed during the bioconversion of linoleic fatty acid by desaturation at the carbon-6 position. Nutritional studies indicate that GLA (C-18:3) may be considered an essential dietary fatty acid and dietary supplementation may provide significant health benefits. Unless specifically supplemented, the typical western diet is essentially devoid of GLA (C-18:3) omega-6 fatty acid.18 • Essential Fatty Acid Balance: The Western diet is out of sync due to the imbalance of the essential fatty acids consumed.19, 20 Consumption of omega-6 fatty acids has increased substantially in the developed countries at the expense of omega-3 fatty acids. One of the causes for this imbalance is the nutritional concept that “… linoleic and arachidonic acids are the most effective component acids of fats in mitigating the essential fatty acid syndrome, while linolenic acid is inferior.”21,22 This concept and the oxidative instability of linolenic fatty acid contributed to the decline of linolenic-rich oils usage in processed foods. The essentiality of omega-3 wasn’t conclusively identified until 1982.23,24 Some of the other factors contributing to the demise of omega-3 fatty acids in the diet were (1) decreased fish consumption, (2) emergence of the vegetable oil industry, (3) increased refined cereal products consumption, (4) increased usage of hydrogenated oils with trans fatty acids, and (5) animal feeds with low omega-3 fatty acid contents. Additionally, linoleic and linolenic fatty acids compete metabolically for the same enzymes. The dominant fatty acid commands a greater share and more of its downstream metabolities are produced.17 There are only minor differences in the molecular structure of the omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acid families; however, they act very differently in the human body. The metabolic products of the omega-6 fatty acids promote inflammation, blood clotting, and tumor growth, while the omega-3 fatty acids are generally viewed as antiinflammatory. Therefore, it is important to maintain a balance of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids in the diet as these two substances work together to promote health. When one omega family predominates, either more pro- or antiinflammatory responses are formed. That means there is less potential for self-regulation because the omega-3 and omega-6 families tend to self regulate when they are in balance. An excess or imbalance of omega-6 fatty acids can affect the onset or progression of many diseases, such as heart disease, cancer, asthma, arthritis, and depression.25 The FDA has given approval for a claim for foods containing EPA and DHA fatty acids. The latest approval allows claims, such as: “An excellent source of omega-3 EPA and DHA,” “High in omega-3 EPA and DHA,” or “Rich in omega-3 EPA and DHA.” The product must contain a combined total of at least 32 mg of EPA and DHA per serving to qualify for this claim and include the statement:
Fats and Oils Formulation
273
“Contains (×) mg of EPA and DHA per serving, which is (×)% of the 160 mg daily value for a combination of EPA and DHA.”14 The FDA recommends that consumers not exceed more than a total of 3 grams per day of EPA and DHA omega-3 fatty acids, with no more than 2 grams per day from a dietary supplement. This limitation stems from a concern that consumption of high levels of these long-chain omega-3 fatty acids may increase bleeding time, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and blood glucose levels in noninsulin-dependent diabetics.26 Nutritional study results suggest that increased consumption of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, which would decrease the omega-6 to omega-3 ratio, is beneficial for individuals suffering from coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, immune response disorders, and mental illness.27 The 2005 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Report encouraged consumers to keep their total fat intake between 20 to 35% of calories with polyunsaturated fatty acids as high as 10% of total calories. A low intake of fats and oils, less than 20% of calories, increases the risk of inadequate vitamin E and the essential fatty acids and may contribute to unfavorable changes in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) blood cholesterol and triglycerides.
4.2.3 Isomerized Fatty Acids Isomers are compounds with identical chemical formulae, but different molecular arrangements. Isomers of unsaturated fatty acids have identical numbers of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen atoms, but the double bonds differ in position or geometric arrangement. One of the effects of isomerization exhibited in Table 4.1 is that the fatty acids petroselinic, elaidic, and vaccenic are isomers of oleic fatty acid. All four monounsaturated fatty acids have the same chemical formula, C18H34O2, but their melting points vary from 16° to 44°C due to changes in their molecular arrangement. 4.2.3.1 Positional Isomers A movement of the double bonds along the carbon chain causes positional isomerism. In this isomer, the double bond is located one position removed from the original double bond location. High temperature, acid, or alkaline conditions can cause the double bonds to migrate from the cis 9, 12, and 15 locations. Positional isomers are more dense than the original cis unsaturated fatty acid, which increases the melting characteristics. When only one double bond exists in a fatty acid, as in C-18:1, the melting point is lower if it is located after an odd-numbered carbon and also when it is in the middle of the chain.28 Nutritionally, the essential value of the polyunsaturated fatty acids, linoleic and linolenic, are lost when the double bonds migrate to new locations. 4.2.3.2 Trans Fatty Acids Trans fatty acids are found in meat and milk from ruminant animals, marine oils, hydrogenated and deodorized oils. Vaccenic fatty acid, C-18:1, trans 11, is the predominate trans fatty acid in ruminant fats and elaidic fatty acid, C-18:1, trans 9,
274
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
in hydrogenated and deodorized oils.29 Trans fatty acids are unsaturated fatty acids that contain at least one double bond in the trans configuration as a result of geometric isomerism. In nature, most unsaturated fatty acids have the hydrogen atoms attached to the carbons on the same side of the molecule in the cis form. Hydrogen atoms attached to the carbon at a double bond on opposite sides of molecule are trans-isomers. A tighter stacking of the molecules allows trans fatty acids to behave like saturated fatty acids. Trans fatty acids always have higher melting points and a better oxidative stability than their cis counterparts.28 Like the positional fatty acids, trans-isomers of linoleic and linolenic fatty acids are devoid of the essential fatty acid activity to convert to longer chain unsaturated fatty acids in the human body. Nutritionally, trans fatty acids are regarded like saturated fatty acids in that both can cause an increase in plasma LDL cholesterol. However, saturated fatty acids increase HDL cholesterol modestly while trans fatty acids decrease it. A majority of the trans fatty acids are manmade, that is, they are formed principally during hydrogenation and to a lesser extent during deodorization, frying, and baking. The amount of isomerization during hydrogenation varies with catalyst type and concentration, degree of hydrogenation, and the time, temperature, and pressure used. During hydrogenation, trans formation shows a consistent ratio of 0.73 trans acids/unit iodine value drop30 up to the point that the maximum trans fatty acid content is attained at ~55% for soybean and canola oil. After this point the trans fatty acid content decreases due to the elimination of the unsaturated fatty acids. Isomerization during deodorization, frying, and baking is a function of time and temperature. Depending on the processing conditions, 3 to 24% of linolenic fatty acid and a maximum of 2% of linoleic fatty acid will be converted to trans-isomers. Deodorization conditions of 60 minutes at 250°C (482°F) produced 1.8% trans fatty acids when processing canola oil and 0.85% trans when processing sunflower oil. A reduction of the stripping temperature to 235°C (455°F) lowered trans fatty acid formation to 0.65% for canola oil and 0.25% for sunflower oil.31 A minor source of trans fatty acids is from ruminant animal fats, such as milk, butter, and beef tallow. Ruminant animals have bacteria that produce trans fatty acids during biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids in the rumen. The diet of other animals may contribute to trans fatty acid content. The intake of trans fatty acids from ruminant fats shows a less consistent association with coronary artery disease than does the industrially hydrogenated oils.10 4.2.3.3 Conjugated Linoleic Fatty Acid (CLA) Conjugated linoleic fatty acids are a mixture of geometric isomers of linoleic fatty acid. Technically, conjugated fatty acids are trans fatty acids, but without the negative effects. The FDA has excluded CLA fatty acids from the trans fatty acid labeling requirement. FDA identifies trans fatty acids as an unsaturated fatty acid with one or more isolated double bonds. The CLA’s two double bonds are not isolated, but conjugated, that is, separated by a single bond.32 Conjugated linoleic fatty acid is an imprecise term used to define a group of fatty acids with 18 carbons and 2 conjugated double bonds. Using this terminology, over 50 chemical distinct molecules
Fats and Oils Formulation
275
could be called CLA. Only 2 conjugated linoleic fatty acids have been the focus of most research into biological activity, namely, 9,11-cis, trans-octadecadienoic and 10,12-trans, cis-octadecadienoic fatty acids. CLA in triglycerides or free fatty acid behave like DHA fatty acids and are much less stable, not only in comparison with the nonconjugated isomer, linoleic, but also most polyunsaturated fatty acids, including linolenic and arachidonic fatty acids.33 Conjugated linoleic fatty acids have a number of different sources. Some plants and marine organisms produce high concentrations of conjugated fatty acids; these are typically conjugated trienes (three double bonds). Conjugation is also a typical first reaction in the biohydrogenation of polyunsaturated fatty acids by ruminants. Dairy fats are a major source of conjugated linolenic fatty acids. The content of CLA in ruminant fat can range from 0.5 to 2.0% depending on the diet fed to the animals.34 Unintentional conjugation reactions occur during partial hydrogenation of polyunsaturated fatty acids with nickel and platinum catalysts.35,36 CLA can be manufactured through organic synthesis, microbial fermentation, enzymatic isomerization, or genetic or bioengineering. Two or more patented processes for the preparation of CLA from safflower and/or sunflower oils have been commercialized. Commercial CLA is produced by alkaline isomerization of linoleate-rich oils and tends to contain an equimolor mixture of 9 cis, 11 trans and 10 trans, 12 cis-octadecadienoic fatty acids, together with variable amounts up to 30% of both geometrical and positional isomers.37 Bioengineering to make CLA the predominant fatty acid fraction in a plant’s oil is theorized to be the least capital-intensive source. Fermentation technology utilizing linoleic fatty acid isomerase is also reported capable of converting linolenic fatty acid to CLA.38 These CLA isomers may have several health-promoting properties, including cancer protection, heart disease defense, enhanced immunity, increased bone mineralization, and reduction in body fat.39,40 Rumenic fatty acid, C-18:2 (cis-9, trans 11), also appears to reduce cancer risks. The trans-10, cis-12 CLA isomer helps burn fat, enhance muscle tone, increase nutrient absorption and improve the body’s efficiency at extracting energy from food. Human studies have demonstrated a decrease in fat mass. One showed that consumption of at least 3 grams a day of dietary CLA led to a 3.9% decrease in body fat.41 4.3 PALATABILITY Palatability consists of the organoleptic and physical properties that make a food product pleasurable or, at the very least, not unpleasant to eat. One of the most important palatability parameters for users of edible fats and oils is flavor. The lipids contribute undesirable as well as desirable flavors. Flavor sensation is a composite of taste, odor, and mouth feel. Fats and oils are excellent solvents for many of the good-tasting components in foods and provide the desirable flavor release and mouth feel that are lacking in foods with reduced or no fat. The major causes of off-flavors in food oils and fats are oxidation and hydrolysis. Oxidation results from the combining of oxygen with a fat or oil, which is normally caused by the presence of air.
276
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
The process is accelerated by exposure to light, heat, certain metals, and sometimes moisture. Hydrolysis is a cleavage reaction of a fatty acid by moisture. The end product from the hydrolysis of an oil or fat, if complete hydrolysis were to occur, would be glycerine and free fatty acids (FFA). The liberated fatty acids impart characteristic flavors that are objectionable even in small concentrations. Mouth feel and flavor release are organoleptic characteristics that must be controlled by the physical properties of the edible fats and oils products. These properties can be controlled by the judicious selection of the melting properties of the component base oils and the hydrogenated, fractionated, interesterified, or esterified basestocks in the formulated blends. 4.3.1 Oxidation The relative importance of the oxidative stability of a fat or oil product depends on the intended use of the product, the temperature abuse to which it will be exposed, and the shelf life or use life expectancy. Fats differ considerably in the way in which their oxidation and accompanying flavor deterioration proceed. The more highly saturated fats and oils and hydrogenated isomerized products experience relatively little change in flavor during the early phases of oxidation, but off-flavor development is sudden and definite. Unsaturated oils exhibit gradual flavor deterioration, with a greater tendency to develop unpleasant flavors and odors. The amount of oxygen that must be absorbed to produce offensive flavors corresponds to the fatty acid composition of the oil, the position of the unsaturated fatty acid on the glycerol, the level of isomerized fatty acids, the presence of natural or added antioxidants, the metal content, and temperature exposure. The oxidative stability of fat and oil products is determined by the distribution, geometry, and number of double bonds. Oxidation can occur only in the unsaturated fatty acid portions of the triglyceride molecule because the presence of a double bond is necessary for oxidation to occur under ordinary conditions. Cis fatty acids oxidize more readily than their trans isomers. Conjugated double bonds are more reactive than nonconjugated bonds, and polyunsaturated fatty acids are more reactive than saturated ones. The oxidizability of unsaturated fatty acids can be estimated by the linear increase in the rate of oxidation with the increasing number of active methylene groups located between two bonds. From this relationship, the oxidizability of each polyunsaturated fatty acid is increased approximately twofold for each active methylene group.42 It is well established that the more unsaturated a fatty acid is, the less oxidative stability it naturally possesses, as illustrated by the relative oxidation rates of the fatty acids listed below:43 Fatty Acids Relative Oxidation Rates Fatty Acid
Active
Relative
Methylene Groups
Oxidation Rates
C-18:1 Oleic
0
1
C-18:2 Linoleic
1
10
Fats and Oils Formulation
277
Fatty Acids Relative Oxidation Rates (Continued) Active
Relative
Methylene Groups
Oxidation Rates
C-18:3 Linolenic
2
20
C-20:4 Arachidonic
3
40
C-20:5 Eicosapentaenoic
4
80
C-22:6 Docosahexaenoic
5
160
Fatty Acid
Monounsaturated fatty acids with only one double bond, represented here by oleic fatty acid, are the most oxidatively stable of the unsaturated fatty acids. Investigators have demonstrated that the natural cis-isomeric fatty acid form has less oxidative stability that the corresponding trans-isomer; therefore, a judicious selection of the source oil and processing conditions for the finished product formulation must be made to achieve the required oxidation stability. This is especially important when reformulating fat and oils products to eliminate trans fatty acids or to incorporate omega-3 long-chain unsaturated fatty acids. Fats and oils oxidative reactions are directly related to the fatty acid composition and more specifically to the type and amount of cis unsaturation. Iodine value measurements can be used to estimate the oxidative stability of a natural fat or oil, as the products with the highest unsaturation are most likely to experience autoxidation. Two other methods to estimate the oxidative stability of a fat or oil are inherent oxidative stability and oxidizability ratings. The inherent oxidation stability uses the relative oxidation rates to calculate stability ratings for individual fats and oils. The formula for this calculation is to multiply the decimal fraction of each unsaturated fatty acid present by its relative oxidation rate and then adding these results to obtain the calculated oxidative stability rating.44 The oxidizability rating is the sum of polyunsaturated fatty acids times the active methylene groups, for example, (% C-18:2 x 1) + (% C-18:3 x 2), etc., until all of the polyunsaturated fatty acids are included in the calculation.42 Table 4.2 presents the results of the three methods for 18 different fats and oils.42-44 All three of the evaluations have a broad agreement, but minor disagreements have been recorded in some instances. Differences exist in the overall ranking for NuSun and peanut oil and for the placement for palm oil, lard, and milk fat on the basis of iodine value. These differences are the result of factoring the effects of fatty acid distribution and geometry into the evaluation. All three of the oxidative stability evaluation methods agree that menhaden fish oil, with its long-chain essential fatty acids, is considerably more liable for rapid oxidation and flavor reversion than any of the other fats and oils listed. The oxidative stability is different for each fat and oil raw material and must be considered when formulating fats and oils ingredients. As the oxidative reaction for fats and oils is related to the type and amount of unsaturation, oxidative stability can be improved by controlling the degree and type of unsaturation. This can be accomplished by source oil selection, blending source oils, or processing. Hydrogenation has been the preferred processing tool to improve the oxidative stability of oil by
278
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 4.2 Fats and Oils Oxidative Stability Ratings Inherent Rating Worst
Best
Fat and Oil Source Menhaden oil
Calculated
Oxidative
PUFA
Iodine
Stability
Oxidizability
Value
32.9
148.5
176.2
Safflower oil
8.0
78.5
146.1
Sunflower oil
7.1
69.1
135.3
Soybean oil
7.1
68.9
133.0
Corn oil
6.5
62.0
128.4
Cottonseed oil
5.8
55.8
112.6
Canola oil
4.5
38.6
113.0
Peanut oil
3.7
32.0
97.1
NuSun oil
3.7
30.6
104.9
High-oleic sunflower oil
1.7
9.0
85.6
Olive oil
1.6
7.7
82.4
High-oleic safflower oil
1.6
7.4
83.3
Palm oil
1.5
10.9
52.4
Lard
1.5
10.3
59.3
Tallow
0.8
3.7
48.4
Milk fat
0.7
4.0
34.0
Palm kernel oil
0.4
2.3
17.2
Coconut oil
0.2
1.6
8.1
saturation or isomerization of the unsaturated fatty acids. Modification by hydrogenation provided a practical, but not complete solution to the flavor reversion problem of soybean oil. Reduction of the linolenic fatty acid content from ~9.0 to <3.0% increased the oxidative stability of soybean oil to an acceptable level. Partial hydrogenation not only saturates naturally occurring cis double bonds, but also isomerizes some of them to the higher melting trans forms as well. Oxidative stability is improved as the hydrogenation level is increased to reduce the cis unsaturates because the reaction sites are eliminated with saturation or protected by isomerization. Figure 4.1 compares the effect of selective and nonselective hydrogenation conditions on oxidative stability as measured by the active oxygen method (AOM). Selective hydrogenation conditions increase oxidative stability at a more rapid rate because they favor isomerization to trans fatty acids and the sequential elimination of unsaturated fatty acids of linolenic → linoleic → oleic → stearic rather than reacting uniformly with all the double bonds present. Formulation to reduce or eliminate trans fatty acids from the diet means that the use of the hydrogenation process may be limited to fully saturated fats and oils. Another process capable of modifying fats and oils functionality is interesterification; however, the effect of this process on oxidative stability is unclear. Most fats and oils experts agree that positioning of the fatty acids within the triglyceride has an
Fats and Oils Formulation
279
300
AOM Stability, hours
250 200 150 100 50 0
120
110
100 90 Iodine Value Selective
80
70
Nonselective
Figure 4.1 Hydrogenation selectivity effect on oxidative stability.
effect on oxidation, but disagree as to the effect. One theory is that unsaturated fatty acids concentrated in the sn-2 position may offer some protection from oxidation as the outer positions are more reactive. This theory is strengthened by the fact that most plants naturally synthesize oils with the unsaturated fatty acids concentrated in the sn-2 position.45 Other experts indicate that monounsaturated fatty acids are more stable in the sn-2 position but that polyunsaturated fatty acids in the middle position are more prone to oxidation than the sn-1 and sn-3 positions. It appears that the interesterification process may either improve or decrease oxidative stability depending on the original fats and oils components. Another variable is related to process control: tocopherol degradation during interesterification. Reaction time, temperature, catalyst type, and level can adversely affect the level of the natural antioxidant remaining in the finished product to lower the oxidative stability. Enzymatic interesterification is favored over the chemical process because of the milder reaction conditions and the selective and positional fatty acid exchange. The lower operating temperatures and the specificity of the enzyme reaction result in a significantly better retention of the natural antioxidants found in oils.46 Enzyme reactions can proceed efficiently at ambient temperature and pressure with the protection afforded by a nitrogen atmosphere.47 Fractionation is another process that has a capability for producing trans-free basestocks capable of replacing hydrogenated basestocks for formulation of the various fats and oils products. Fractionation processes separate fats and oils into fractions with different melting characteristics: normally a soft or olein fraction and a higher melting or a stearine fraction. The natural antioxidants accumulate in the soft or olein fraction. Therefore, the stearine fraction has less protection from oxidation than natural or hydrogenated fats and oils with similar melting characteristics. The effects of lipid oxidation apply equally to fats and oils alone as well as to lipids in food, where they are mixed with water, carbohydrates, proteins, and minerals.
280
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
However, in foods some additional factors can overshadow the fundamental principals of oxidation. The importance of these additional factors depends on the distribution of the fats and oils in the food product. In most high-fat foods, the other ingredients are dispersed in the lipids, like a water-in-oil emulsion, to produce a continuous phase. In this situation, the lipids are on the surface and in direct contact with the air. The rate of oxidation should be, and usually is, the same as for the fat or oil alone. In low-fat foods, the lipids are generally dispersed in droplets to produce a noncontinuous lipid phase. In these foods, the rate of oxidation may be much less or greater than the same lipids dispersed in a continuous phase. The important variables influencing lipid oxidation rates in foods with a noncontinuous phase are water activity, the ratio of free to bound lipids, and the pH. The lowest reaction rate is between 0.2 to 0.3 water activity for most foods. Foods tend to show accelerated oxidation rates below and above this water activity range. Generally, the lowest rate of oxidation occurs near pH 7. As the pH decreases and metals are solubilized, oxidation in many foods is greatly accelerated. In most cases, alkaline pH does not accelerate oxidation.48 4.3.1.1 Flavor Reversion Flavor reversion, caused by oxidation, is most prevalent in oils high in polyunsaturates. Reverted flavors are observed long before other oxidized flavors are formed. At low levels of oxidation, the change generally known as flavor reversion is characteristic of the source fat or oil. For example, soybean oil flavor reversion has been described as beany and grassy at the more advanced stages, all objectionable flavors. In contrast, corn oil’s reverted flavor has been described as pleasant, slightly nutty, and a slightly sweet flavor often associated with cooked sweet corn. Likewise, cottonseed oil has been a favorite for snack frying due to the desirable nutty reverted flavor. Flavor reversion due to oxidation is not usually a problem with coconut and palm kernel oils. These oils are more prone to hydrolysis to produce a disagreeable soapy flavor. The reverted oil flavors have been characterized as somewhat pleasant or objectionable as follows: Reverted Oil Flavor Characterization Pleasant
Objectionable
Cottonseed oil
Soybean oil
Peanut oil
Safflower oil
Corn oil
Canola oil
Sunflower oil
Palm oil
Olive oil
Lard
Butter oil
Tallow
Menhaden oil
In the case of most well-processed oils, reversion is not a frequent problem because the maximum oxidative stability has been processed or formulated into
Fats and Oils Formulation
281
the product. High linolenic (C-18:3) and linoleic (C-18:2) fatty acids are the most important precursors of flavor reversion. Experiments interesterifying linolenic fatty acid into cottonseed oil, which contains very little, if any, of this fatty acid, produced the reverted soybean oil flavor.49 These results led to the adoption of selective hydrogenation to convert linolenic fatty acid to linoleic fatty acid by saturating one double bond to improve the flavor stability of soybean salad oils. Specifically, the linolenic fatty acid content was lowered from nearly 9% to less than 3%. This was accomplished with selective hydrogenation by reducing the iodine value (IV) of the soybean oil to less than 110. Oxidative stability is improved as the hydrogenation level is increased to reduce the unsaturates because some reaction sites are either eliminated or isomerized. 4.3.1.2 Antioxidants The oxidation rate for a fat or oil product depends primarily on the number of double bonds and their arrangement; however, oxidative stability is also influenced by the presence of natural or manmade antioxidants. Antioxidants are compounds that provide greater oxidative stability and longer shelf life or use life for edible fats and oils by delaying the onset of oxidative rancidity. Antioxidants function by inhibiting or interrupting the free-radical mechanism of glyceride autoxidation. They function as free radical acceptors, thereby terminating oxidation at the initial step. All food products in interstate commerce in the United States are subject to regulations under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; the Meat Inspection Act; and the Poultry Inspection Act. These regulations establish limitations on the use of antioxidants and other food additives in food products. The antioxidants permitted under these regulations include:50-57 • Tocopherols are natural antioxidants contained in most vegetable oils. In most applications, tocopherol addition levels of 0.02 to 0.06% are sufficient to provide good antioxidant properties. Tocopherol additions have the greatest application for stabilizing edible fats of animal origin because of the absence of natural antioxidants in these products. Vegetable oils are the source of the tocopherols, and enough of the natural antioxidant survives processing to provide the optimum stability available from tocopherols. • Propyl gallate is an effective antioxidant for shelf-life or use-life improvement of vegetable oils at usage levels of 0.01 to 0.02% or the applicable regulatory agency permitted levels; however, its use is hampered by solubility problems, discoloration, and poor heat stability. Edible oils stabilized with propyl gallate can darken when stored in black iron vessels, packaged in metal containers, or when they come into contact with metal processing equipment because of iron-gallate complexing. Additionally, propyl gallate may be inactivated in alkaline systems, particularly at elevated temperatures. These deficiencies have limited the use of this antioxidant in U.S. edible fats and oils products because an alternative, more effective antioxidant — tertiary butylhydroquinone (TBHQ) — is permitted. • Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) has a very good carry-through effect in that it can withstand high food-processing temperatures, such as those experienced in baking and frying; however, BHA has a strong phenolic odor that is particularly
282
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
noticeable with the initial heating of frying fat or oil products and is described as a chemical odor. Another concern is the development of a pink color with exposure to high concentrations of alkaline metal ions, such as sodium or potassium. • Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) has a molecular structure and performance similar to BHA. Both BHA and BHT are extremely soluble in edible fats and oils and have practically no water solubility. BHT can experience some darkening in the presence of iron, but the degree is not serious. • Tertiary butylhydroquinone (TBHQ) is the most recent addition to the approved antioxidant list in the United States and has not yet gained approval in many other countries. TBHQ has been found to be the most effective antioxidant for unsaturated vegetable oils and also offers several other advantages: (1) no discoloration when used in the presence of iron, (2) no discernible odor or flavor imparted to fats and oils, (3) good solubility in fats and oils, (4) effective in poultry and animal fats as well as in the vegetable oils, (5) some carry-through protection in baked and fried foods, and (6) a stabilizing effect upon tocopherols. One concern with TBHQ utilization is that a pink color can develop with an alkaline pH, certain proteins, or sodium salts.
Natural antioxidants have become more desirable due to reluctance to the use of synthetic products in foods. Tocopherols are the most frequently used natural antioxidant, but they do not provide the desired protection in all cases. Therefore, other natural antioxidants have gained favor. Extracts of many plants have varying degrees of antioxidant activities in fats and oils. Some of these natural antioxidant materials include: • Rosemary extracts: Addition levels of 100 to 500 ppm provide oxidative protection in vegetable oils equivalent to 200 ppm BHA/BHT. Levels exceeding 400 ppm were found necessary for meat fats. Addition of 500 ppm to salad dressing replaced 75 ppm EDTA (ethylenediamine tetraacetate) with a six-month shelf life.58 A combination of 0.076% oleoresin rosemary extract, 0.066% sage extract, and 0.037% citric acid provided optimal retention of linoleic fatty acid during potato chip frying.59 • Chinese green tea extract: Epicatechin gallate extracted from green tea leaves was found more effective than α-tocopherol, BHA, BHT, and TBHQ to stabilize highly unsaturated marine oils60 as well as canola oil, lard, and chicken fat.61 • Chili powder extract: Antioxidant from capsicum (chili) powder extracted with ethanol successfully stabilized flaxseed oil with more than 86% unsaturated fatty acids at an antioxidant/oil ratio of 1:40.62 • Grape extracts: Grapes are a major source of phenolic compounds among fruits and vegetables. An extract obtained from the bagasse from Thompson seedless grapes had antioxidant activity, which exceeded the activity of BHA and was comparable to TBHQ.63 • Ascorbyl palmitate: A notable success in fish oil stabilization has been achieved with a combination of 0.2 to 2% α- or γ-tocopherol, 0.1% ascorbic palmitate, and 0.5% lecithin. This combination prevented peroxide development, but did not inhibit off-flavor development.64
Much of the success of antioxidants depends on their being in chemical contact with the product they are protecting. Therefore, antioxidant formulations containing
Fats and Oils Formulation
283
various combinations of different antioxidant and chelating agents are generally used in most food applications, rather than individual antioxidant compounds. Not only does the use of such formulations provide a convenience, in that it is easier to handle the diluted antioxidants, but it also allows the formulator to take advantage of the synergistic properties of the different antioxidant compounds. For example, BHA and BHT used in combination provide a greater antioxidant effect than when either is used alone. Propylene glycol and vegetable oils usually serve as solvents for the antioxidant mixtures, with lecithin, citrate, monoglyceride citrate, or mono- and diglycerides included in the formulations as emulsifiers. Synergism is a characteristic common to many antioxidant mixtures. Synergistic systems take advantage of the greater potency produced by the mixture without increasing the total antioxidant content. A synergist, such as citric acid, has two important functions in antioxidant formulations: (1) it increases the antioxidant effectiveness of the combination, and (2) it ties up or sequesters the trace metals, which are fat-oxidizing catalysts, by forming complex, stable compounds (chelates). Other compounds that function as synergists and chelating agents include isopropyl citrate, stearyl citrate, orthophosphoric acid, sodium monohydrogen phosphate, pyrophosphoric acid and its salts, metaphosphoric acid and its salts, calcium disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and disodium EDTA. 4.3.2 Hydrolysis Edible fats and oils hydrolysis results in the formation of free fatty acids, diand monoglyceride, and glycerol, provided the moisture content of the oil exceeds a certain level. Fatty acids have distinct flavors and odors when their chain lengths are shorter than 14 carbons. For this reason, vegetable oils containing mostly C-16 and C-18 fatty acids, which are not too unsaturated, do not become unpalatable when only slightly hydrolyzed (i.e., 1.0 to 3.0% FFA). However, with palm kernel and coconut oils, the same FFA level gives a very distinct off-flavor because these oils contain high levels of C-6 to C-12 fatty acids. Enzymes may also cause hydrolysis. This occurs normally with oils produced from fruit coats with a high moisture content, such as palm or olive oils. Because FFA and the accompanying substances are largely removed by processing, the concern for hydrolytic cleavage lies with the prepared food process or composition (i.e., fried foods or highmoisture products). 4.3.3 Mouth Feel Mouth feel is dependent on three factors: (1) temperature, (2) taste sensation, and (3) texture. The texture of a food fat is influenced by the liquidity of the product. It imparts tenderness and richness and improves the eating quality of the prepared food. Mouth feel can apply to either the ability of liquid oils to form an oily film, which is viscosity related, or how well a solid fat melts in the mouth to give a pleasant cooling effect instead of a pasty, waxy feeling that can mask desirable flavors.
284
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 4.3 Triglyceride Liquidity and Functionality Liquidity
Triglyceride
Zone
Composition
Chilled Temperature
Room Temperature
Body Temperature
Heated Temperature
Melting Point °F
°C
Triglyceride Structure
Functionality
LLL
8.0
–13.3
U3
nutrition
OLL
20.0
–6.7
U3
clarity
PLL
22.0
–5.6
SU2
lubricity
OOL
27.0
–2.8
U3
PLO
30.0
–1.1
SU2
SLL
34.0
1.1
SU2
OOO
42.0
5.6
U3
lubricity
SOL
43.0
6.1
SU2
clarity
OOL
60.0
15.6
SU2
oral properties
SOO
73.0
22.8
SU2
mechanicalperformance
PPL
81.0
27.2
S 2U
oral properties
SPL
86.0
30.0
S 2U
structure
SSL
91.0
32.8
S 2U
aeration
PPO
95.0
35.0
S 2U
lubricity
SPO
100.0
37.8
S 2U
moisture barrier
SSO
107.0
41.7
S 2U
PPP
133.0
56.1
S3
structure
SPP
140.0
60.0
S3
lubricity
SSP
142.0
61.1
S3
moisture barrier
SSS
149.0
65.0
S3
stabilizer
Notes: P = Palmitic; S = Stearic; O = Oleic; L = Linoleic.
The melting point of common triglyceride mixtures can be separated into four liquidity zones to indicate their physical states at chilled, room, body, and heated temperatures, as indicated in Table 4.3. Triglycerides in the chilled-temperature zone will remain liquid under cool conditions. Room-temperature triglycerides will remain liquid only if consumed at ambient temperatures or higher. The third zone of triglycerides melts near body temperature to give a cooling effect in the mouth. The high-melting triglycerides help maintain plasticity until baking or cooking temperatures are attained. It should be noted that fats and oils are not composed of a single triglyceride or even a single liquidity zone and that the ratio of each particular triglyceride will determine the melting behavior. In most cases, a liquid oil fraction suspends a solid fat fraction in a seemingly solid product, whereas an apparently liquid oil usually contains dissolved solid fractions; therefore, it is the predominance of triglycerides from one of the zones that determines liquidity characteristics.65,66
Fats and Oils Formulation
285
4.4 Physical Characteristics The characteristics of the fats and oils selected for a particular application are of primary importance in the design of a product for a specific or general-purpose use. Formulation of margarines, shortenings and other fat-based products must be based primarily on an understanding of the relationships between specific physical measurements and the composition of the oil blends and their components along with an appreciation of processing effects. Blending and processing achieve desirable solids-to-liquid ratios. The crystalline structure of fats is important in formulation of shortening, margarine, and other fat products because each crystal form has its own physical property for plasticization, hardness, softness, texture, solubility, mouth feel, aeration, and other properties, depending on the food in which this ingredient is incorporated. Oils are chosen for their peculiar crystal habits resulting from nature or processing conditions. Each fat or oil component has an inherent crystallization tendency that can be modified with various processes to help produce the desired properties. Hydrogenation has been the primary process used to change the physical properties, but interesterification and fractionation can also be used to modify the melting rate and range properties. Fats and oils emulsification properties are accomplished with adjustments of the fat structure or addition of surfaceactive agents. Typical food emulsifiers supplement and improve the functionality of a properly developed fat or oil product to act as lubricants, build structure, aerate, improve eating characteristics, extend shelf life, serve as crystal modifiers, provide antisticking properties, act as dispersants, improve moisture retention, and stabilize the emulsion, in addition to other beneficial functions. Obviously, no single-source oil or fat, process variable, or additive can perform all of these different functions for every application. In the development of optimum fats and oils systems for particular applications, formulators must consider the usage application, preparation method, effects of other ingredients, emulsion characteristics, nutritional requirements, economics, and any other applicable criteria for the prepared food product. 4.4.1 Fat Crystal Habit By ordinary visual observation, shortenings, margarines, and other solidified fat products appear to be homogenous solids; however, microscopic examination reveals them to be mixtures of liquid oil and small separate, discrete crystals. The crystal types formed define the textural and functional properties of most fat-based products. Fats and oils are polymorphic and transform systematically through a series of successive crystalline forms without a change in chemical structure. The order of transition has been established with heating and cooling behavior studies as:
Alpha → Beta Prime → Mixed → Beta
The rate of transformation is dependent on the purity of the triglyceride. The more homogeneous fats, which consist of relatively few, closely related triglycerides,
286
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
transform rapidly to the stable β form. The more heterogeneous fats, which contain a diverse assortment of different triglycerides, transform more slowly. Some fats consisting of a completely randomized assortment of triglycerides can exist almost indefinitely in the β′ form and transform further only under unusual conditions. Each crystal form has its own physical properties — plasticity, hardness, softness, texture, solubility, mouth feel, aerating, and others — that are important to the food product into which the fat is formulated. The differences among the four crystal forms include the following:67,68 • α-crystal forms are the lowest melting and the most loosely packed arrangement of the molecules. The molecules are as far apart as possible and still remain in the solid state. Crystals in the α form are fragile, transparent rosettes about 5 µm in size that transform readily to higher melting modifications and, therefore, are seldom encountered in solidified fats and oils products. • β′-crystal forms are tiny, delicate, and needle shaped and seldom grow to more than 1 µm in length. They can pack together into dense, fine-grained, ridge structures. The β′-crystal form tends to be structured as a fine three-dimensional network capable of immobilizing a large amount of liquid oil. β′ is the crystal form desired for most solidified products because it promotes plasticity. • β -crystal forms are high-melting, self-occluding, coarse, large, stable platelets with the closest possible arrangement of the molecules. β-crystals average 25 to 50 µm in length and can grow to more than 100 µm during extended aging periods. Clumps of β-crystals can be 1 mm or more in diameter and are usually responsible for the appearance of visibly grainy fats and oils products, which can lead to separation of the oil portion. • Depending on a variety of factors, a fat may exist in one crystalline form or it may be a mixture of several different crystal modifications. The mixed forms are usually somewhat coarse crystals that tend to grow to about 3 to 5 µm in length and aggregate in sizable clumps, which gradually grow larger with the passage of time. Flaked fats are usually in the mixed crystal form, especially those containing soybean oil.
The rate at which fats and oils transform from one crystal form to another is governed by the ease with which their component molecules can pack together in the crystal lattice. Similar molecules can pack closely and their crystals transform rapidly to the large, stable, high-melting form. Molecules that differ in structure cannot pack together closely, which impedes or prevents crystal transformation. Thus, fats that consist of a heterogeneous assortment of triglycerides tend to remain indefinitely in the smaller, loosely packed, lower melting crystal form; examples are partially hydrogenated cottonseed oil and rearranged lard. The opposite is true of the more homogeneous fats that contain only a few closely related fatty acids types. The rate of transformation of these materials to the larger, high-melting crystals is usually quite rapid.69 Hydrogenated soybean and canola oils are examples of this type of fat, with triglycerides consisting predominately of 18-carbon fatty acids. Table 4.4 identifies the crystal habit of the most commonly used edible fats and oils.70 The crystal habit of each common fat or oil is determined by one or more of four characteristics: (1) palmitic fatty-acid content, (2) distribution and position of
Fats and Oils Formulation
287
Table 4.4 Individual Fats and Oils Crystal Habits β
β-prime
Canola oil
Cottonseed oil
Cocoa butter
Milk fat
Corn oil
Coconut oil
Lard
Menhaden oil
Olive oil
Modified lard
Peanut oil
Palm oil
Safflower oil
Palm kernel oil
Soybean oil
Rapeseed oil
Sunflower oil
Tallow
palmitic and stearic fatty acids on the triglyceride molecule, (3) degree of saturation, and (4) degree of randomization. The stabilizing effect of palmitic fatty acid is related to its triglyceride position and its level in the solid fat portion, which can be increased with hydrogenation or fractionation. In general, the more diverse the triglyceride structure of the highest melting portion of the fat, the lower the β-forming tendency. The importance of position and distribution of palmitic fatty acid is evident when comparing cottonseed oil to lard. Even though each of these fats contains approximately 23% palmitic, β′ is the crystal behavior of cottonseed oil, whereas β is characteristic of lard. This is because palmitic fatty acid predominates at the sn-1 and sn-3 positions in cottonseed oil, but lard has a predominately asymmetric triglyceride structure with palmitic fatty acid in the sn-2 position. The crystal habit of lard can be changed to β′ by interesterification to randomize the fatty acids and to improve the ratio of symmetric triglycerides. Additionally, the risk of graininess and posthardening because of high concentrations of 18-carbon fatty acids in oils, such as sunflower, can be prevented with either co-randomization or the addition of a hydrogenated fat with substantial palmitic fatty acid content.71 Many edible fats and oils products contain various combinations of β- and β′-crystal-tending components. The ratio of β-crystals to β′-crystal helps determine the dominant crystal habit, but the higher melting triglyceride portions of a solidified fat product usually force the fat to assume that crystal form. The crystal form of the solidified fat product has a major influence on the textural properties. In normal practice, some vegetable oils are blended with a minimum of 5% β′ hardfat or 20% of a basestock that has β′-crystal tendencies. This fat must have a higher melting point than the other component for the entire product to crystallize in the stable β′ form. Fats exhibiting a stable β′ form appear smooth, provide good aeration, and have excellent creaming properties for the production of cakes, icings, and other bakery products. Conversely, the β polymorphic form tends to produce large granular crystal and products that are waxy and grainy with poor aeration potential. The β-crystal formers perform well in applications, such as pie crusts, where a grainy texture is desirable; in frying shortenings, where the crystal is destroyed by heating; and in
288
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
liquid shortening, where the large granular crystals are preferred for stability and maintenance of fluidity. 4.4.2 Fat Plasticity Although plastic fats and oils products are usually thought of as a solid material, they are predominately fluids. A plastic fat consists of approximately one-third crystalline solid triglycerides; other components, such as emulsifiers or other additives, are suspended in the remaining two thirds composed of liquid triglycerides. Therefore, plastic fats, such as shortenings, margarines, and specialty products, are composed of a solid phase of fat crystals intimately mixed with a liquid phase of fluid oil. Body is contributed to the fat by the tendency of the solid particles to interlock. Technically, a fat is plastic as long as this interlocking effect is great enough for it to completely resist small deforming stresses. When the stress is increased, a point is reached where the product structure will yield to allow plastic flow, thus the relative hardness and softness, or consistency, of a fat or oil product is a measure of the stress or load required to cause plastic flow or movement. The internal strength of the material, or its capacity for resisting stress, is determined by the number of contact points between the crystal particles. Very small crystals provide more contact points to produce a firmer fat product than do relatively large crystals. With crystals of a uniform size, consistency will be determined by the number of crystals or simply the proportion of liquid and solid fractions. These proportions are, in turn, determined primarily, but not entirely, by the product temperature. Fat products tend to become soft as the crystal content is decreased by partial melting and firm as the crystal content is increased when the temperature is lowered. Simply, the three conditions essential for plasticity in a fat or oil product are72
1. Solid and liquid phases 2. Fine enough dispersion of the solid phase to hold the mass together by internal cohesive force 3. Proper proportions of the two phases
Therefore, plasticity or consistency of an edible oil product depends on the amount of solid material; the size, shape, and distribution of the crystalline material; and the development of crystal nuclei capable of surviving high-temperature abuse and which serves as a starting point for new desirable crystal growth. Further, the firmness of fats and oil products is increased with the smaller β′-crystal sizes because of an increased opportunity for the solids particles to touch and resist flow and the interlacing of long, needlelike crystals rather than with more compact β-crystals of the same size. Another factor most directly and obviously influencing the consistency of a plastic fat or oil factor product is the proportion of the solid phase; as the solids content increases, the edible fat or oil product becomes firmer. The proportion of the solid phase is determined by the extent of the saturation of the fat or oil product, either from the normal fatty acid distribution or due to modification by hydrogenation, fractionation, or interesterification.
Fats and Oils Formulation
289
4.4.3 Solid–Liquid Relationships For a fat or fat blend to be plastic, it must have both a solid and a liquid phase. The ratio of these two phases determines its consistency (i.e., hardness or firmness characteristics). The first most widely adopted method for characterizing this property of a fat product was dilatometry, or the measured change in increased specific volume with increasing temperature due to melting dilation. The dilatometer is a good tool for measuring relative percent solids, but not a perfect one. It is really a means of measuring density empirically adapted to measuring solids in terms of what has been identified as SFI. Another method used to measure and report melting dilations is nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), which determines absolute solids (solid fat content, or SFC) in fats and fat blends. This method has replaced SFI as the recognized solids fat analysis. Either of these methods for measuring the solids contents or some other procedure can be used to identify and control formulations of fats and oils. 4.4.3.1 Hydrogenation In the United States, most fats and oils products have been formulated with hydrogenation as the principal means for modifying the solids-to-liquids ratio of the various fats and oils. During hydrogenation, the consistency of a fat and oil and its characteristics related to consistency, such as melting point, softening point, and amount of solid fat at various temperatures, depends on the source oil and the hydrogenation conditions utilized. The melting point of the hydrogenated product can vary substantially at the same iodine value due to differences in the hydrogenation conditions used. Melting points varying from 96.6 to 127.6°F (35.9 to 53.1°C) have been recorded at an IV of 67 with changes in hydrogenation temperatures from 350 to 265°F (180 to 130°C).73 The comparison of hydrogenation conditions provided in Table 4.5 does not reflect as drastic a change in melting point at the same iodine value, but the effect of nonselective and selective hydrogenation conditions are illustrated. Both conditions show an increased saturation with elevated levels of stearic and oleic fatty acids with corresponding decreases in linoleic fatty acid, but at different rates and amounts of trans acids development. The changes in the saturation/unsaturation levels are reflected in the solids-toliquids ratios determined by SFC or SFI and Mettler dropping point evaluations: • Selective hydrogenation conditions reduce the polyunsaturated linoleic fatty acids instead of the monounsaturated oleic acids at a more selective rate than when under the nonselective conditions. If this preference is high, the hydrogenation proceeds stepwise and formation of stearic fatty acid is limited until linoleic fatty acid has been almost eliminated. • A more rapid stearic fatty acid development with the nonselective conditions effects higher fat solids at the higher temperatures, accompanied by a higher melting point. • The selective reaction causes greater isomerization to trans-isomers and less stearic development to affect high fat solids at the lower temperatures. Because the higher melting stearic fatty acid content is lower, fewer solids are present at the higher temperatures to provide a lower melting point.
290
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 4.5 Cottonseed Oil Hydrogenated Selectively and Non-Selectively Hydrogenation Conditions
None
Iodine Value
110
Selective 92
80
70
Non-Selective 60
92
80
70
60
Fatty Acid Composition, % C-14:0 Myristic
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
C-16:0 Palmitic
22.5
22.6
22.7
22.7
22.7
22.5
22.6
22.6
22.7
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
C-18:0 Stearic
2.5
2.7
3.2
3.9
8.9
4.0
5.7
7.8
12.5
C-18:1 Oleict
18.2
39.0
52.1
61.4
64.4
36.1
48.2
53.8
56.0
C-18:2 Linoleict
54.1
33.2
19.9
10.0
2.1
35.2
21.5
13.8
6.9
C-18:3 Linolenict
0.8
0.7
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
C-20:0 Arachidic
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
C-22:0 Behenic
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
2.0
0.2
0.2
Trans Fatty Acids, %
nil
8.9
17.6
23.4
29.3
4.7
10.5
13.9
19.3
Solids Fat Index 50°F/10.0°C
—
8.5
19.5
31.0
51.0
7.5
17.0
25.5
42.0
70°F/21.1°C
—
4.0
10.0
17.5
37.0
3.0
8.0
14.0
28.0
80°F/26.7°C
—
2.0
6.0
12.0
32.0
2.0
5.0
10.0
23.0 12.5
92°F/33.3°C
—
—
0.8
3.5
16.5
0.1
1.5
4.0
100°F/37.8°C
—
—
—
—
1.5
0.1
1.0
0.5
5.5
104°F/40.0°C
—
—
—
—
1.5
—
—
—
2.5
Mettler Dropping Point, °C
TS
27.3
31.5
33.0
40.0
TS
30.0
35.5
40.0
Laboratory Hydrogenation Conditions:
Selective
Non-Selective
Pressure, bar
0.16
2.7
Temperature, °F
385
300
Nickel Catalyst, % nickel
0.02
0.04
Agitation
Fixed
Fixed
Notes: TS = too soft; t = including trans fatty acids.
In the latter stages of hydrogenation, the conditions used have little effect on the product produced. Isomerization of oleic fatty acid is not particularly affected under different conditions so that the melting point and SFI results are quite predictable from the amount of saturation or IV results. Hydrogenation to produce stearine or low-IV hardfats is the least critical of all hydrogenation operations, as selectivity and isomerization are not factors. Unsaturation is very minor because the oil or fat is almost totally saturated. Some oils can be hardened to higher melting points or titers than others because of their characteristic fatty acid composition. Soybean, canola, sunflower, corn, and safflower oils may be hardened to a titer as high as 65°C;
Fats and Oils Formulation
291
however, it is not a good practice to use these high-titer hardfats for plastic shortening formulation because they solidify into undesirable polymorphic forms. The β tendency, as well as the high titer, is a result of the predominance of the 18-carbon fatty acids that cause the high almost completely hydrogenated product to consist of high levels of tristearin. Cottonseed oil, palm oil, and tallow contain a sufficient proportion of fatty acids with carbon chains higher and lower than C-18 to ensure that tristearin is not predominate, and the solidified oil product will assume the more desirable β′-crystal form. 4.4.3.2 Random Interesterification Random interesterification is an alternative to partially hydrogenated oils that changes the melting characteristics of fat and oil blends without the creation of trans fatty acids. The interesterification process rearranges the distribution of the fatty acids in the triglycerides — producing products with melting and crystallization characteristics different from the original blend. It is usually achieved by blending saturated fats with liquid oils to achieve specific melting profiles associated with the desired functional attributes. Interesterification regroups the fatty acids resulting in softer or harder products depending on the starting raw materials, catalyst, and process used: • Chemical interesterification: Results in a random or statistical redistribution of the fatty acids. The resulting triglyceride composition is predictable from the fatty acid composition of the original fats and oils blend. Because every possible triglyceride has a chance of being formed, the number will be quite large. However, in most cases it is only necessary to identify the interesterified oil in terms of degree of saturation. For example, if S and U are the fractions of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids at 70% and 30%, respectively, then the fractions of the various triglyceride types will be as follows:74
S3 = S3 or 0.73 S2U = 3 x (S2 × U) or 3 × (0.72 × 0.3) SU2 = 3 x (S × U2) or 3 × (0.7 × 0.32) U3 = U3 or 0.33 Total
= 34.3% = 44.1% = 18.9% = 2.7% 100.0%
Some guidelines for the identification of the blend fatty acid composition to interesterification are74
1. The melting point of the interesterified product is determined principally by the amount of S3. 2. Products with high levels of both S3 and U3 will be plastic — characterized by a flat SFC or SFI curve. 3. Products consisting mostly of a single type of triglyceride, for example, S2U, will be sharp melting.
292
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
a. Enzymatic interesterification: Can be preformed with a number of different lipase catalysts. Nonspecific lipases provide random redistribution reactions like the chemical catalyst, but most interesterification lipases are 1,3 specific, which means that only the fatty acids at the outside positions of the triglyceride take part in the reaction. The fatty acids at the sn-2 position are not affected. This reaction is still random for the sn-1 and sn-3 positions. Theoretically, specific fatty acids can be incorporated at a specific position of the triglyceride with the use of some enzyme catalysts. The 1,3 specificity can produce triglycerides with oleic fatty acids in the sn-2 position and saturated palmitic or stearic in exterior positions. Table 4.6 compares the effects of chemical and enzymatic interesterification on the fatty acid distribution at the sn-2 position as well as the SFC and fatty acid composition of the interesterified blends. Due to the regiospecificity of the lipase, the enzymatic rearranged product has a different fatty acid distribution at the sn-2 position than the chemically randomized product. Less change from the original blend analysis is found with the enzymatic interesterification at the sn-2 position.75
The effect of random interesterification on the melting behavior depends on the starting material or mixture of starting materials. Typically, an increase in melting point is experienced with liquid oils and a decrease with fats and oils with starting melting points. However, the lauric oils with short chain fatty acids, react differently than the other saturated fats and oils. Interesterification of a high melting point fat with a liquid oil reduces the blend’s final melting point and the solid fat contents at various temperatures. The interesterification process leads to an increased number of triglyceride types and, therefore, in most cases, to a rather flat solids temperature curve. The wide range of triglycerides in an interesterified blend also retards the recrystallization rate; the β′-crystal is stabilized and transformation to the β-crystal form is slower. Performance-wise, randomization reduces or eliminates several undesirable characteristics peculiar to some oils, that is, slow crystallization, chilling difficulties, soft or fluid at filling, firm product after crystallization, and grainy consistency.76 Liquid vegetable oils tend to have their fatty acids evenly distributed among the different triglycerides. Interesterification changes this distribution to a random one that changes the consistency and raises the melting point. The greatest effects are realized with random interesterification with a seed oil or with a mixture of fats or oils that differ widely in melting point.77 The effects of chemical interesterification on 50:50 blends of fully saturated soybean hardfat and 5 different vegetable oils with a wide range of melting points are shown on Table 4.7.78 This data shows that: • The interesterified blend with the largest amount of saturated fatty acids exhibits the lowest melting point. • The highest content of β′-crystal form was found with blends with coconut, palm, and cottonseed oils and the lowest was found with canola and soybean oil. Probably as a result of the wide range of triglycerides and/or the palmitic fatty acid content. • The physical properties of interesterified fat blends are significantly affected by the composition of the liquid oil portion.
Fats and Oils Formulation
293
Table 4.6 Comparison of Chemical and Enzymatic Interesterification Processes Blend Composition: 75% Palm Oil Stearin with 25% Coconut Oil Interesterification Process Analytical Characteristics
Blend
Chemical
Enzymatic
64.4
67.9
65.7
20°C/68°F
37.4
44.0
41.5
30°C/86°
18.5
18.5
18.6
35°C/95°F
12.3
9.3
10.4
40°C/104°F
6.9
1.5
2.5
C-6:0 Caproic
0.3
0.3
0.2
C-8:0 Caprylic
3.2
3.4
3.1
Solids fat content (NMR) 10°C/50°F
Triglyceride fatty acid composition, %
C-10:0 Capric
2.0
2.1
2.0
C-12:0 Lauric
14.1
14.9
14.8
C-14:0 Myristic
5.9
6.0
6.0
C-16:0 Palmitic
40.6
39.8
40.7
C-18:0 Stearic C-18:1 Oleic
3.8
3.7
4.0
23.1
22.8
22.8
C-18:1 trans
0.5
0.5
0.9
C-18:2 Linoleic
5.1
5.0
5.1
C-20:0 Arachidic
0.3
0.2
—
Other fatty acids Calculated iodine value
1.1
1.3
0.4
29.1
28.7
29.2
sn-2 fatty acid composition,% C-8:0 Caprylic
0.2
2.8
0.9
C-10:0 Capric
0.8
2.3
1.4
C-12:0 Lauric
20.6
21.7
16.4
C-14:0 Myristic
3.3
5.7
4.6
C-16:0 Palmitic
21.6
39.9
28.9
C-18:0 Stearic
1.5
3.4
2.3
C-18:1 Oleic
40.8
19.1
32.7
C-18:1 trans
0.4
0.2
— 7.9
C-18:2 Linoleic
9.7
4.3
C-20:0 Arachidic
—
0.1
—
Other fatty acids
0.6
5.8
0.7
52.2
24.0
41.8
Calculated iodine value
Note: sn-2 = 2 position on the glycerol backbone.
294
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 4.7 Analytical Characteristics of Chemically Interesterified Blends (1:1, wt %) of Fully Hydrogenated Soybean Oil with Selected Vegetable Oils 50:50 Soybean Oil Hardfat plus: Vegetable Oil Source
Soybean
Canola
Cottonseed
Palm
Coconut
C-10:0 Capric
—
—
—
—
1.6
C-12:0 Lauric
—
—
—
—
19.2
Fatty Acid Composition,%
C-14:0 Myristic
—
—
—
—
9.0
C-16:0 Palmitic
10.2
6.8
17.3
26.6
10.8
C-18:0 Stearic
46.9
42.8
46.1
46.3
59.0
C-18:1 Oleic
12.3
34.6
10.7
22.4
2.4
C-18:2 Linoleic
26.6
10.7
25.9
4.7
—
C-18:3 Linolenic
4.0
4.4
—
—
—
C-20:1 Gadoleic
—
0.7
—
—
—
Calculated Iodine Value
67.1
60.4
54.1
27.4
2.1
Capillary Melting Point, °C
52.0
50.0
50.0
48.2
41.0
U3
9.2
9.2
9.8
2.3
9.4
U2S
32.1
37.1
31.2
13.7
21.3
S2U
46.4
44.2
33.9
43.4
15.6
Triglyceride Structure, %
S3
12.3
9.5
25.1
40.6
53.7
Supercooling Temperaturea, °C
18.0
19.0
16.0
13.0
13.0
Blend Crystal Form, % β-crystal
75.3
77.4
62.4
55.0
53.0
β′-crystal
24.7
22.6
37.6
45.0
47.0
Interesterified Crystal Form, % β-crystal
54.0
55.5
41.0
28.0
25.3
β′-crystal
46.0
44.5
59.0
72.0
74.7
Solids Fat Content (NMR) 10°C/50.0°F
53.3
43.2
58.8
80.5
89.6
21°C/69.8°F
38.5
32.1
43.0
73.3
73.4
27°C/80.6°F
33.8
30.1
30.4
71.5
65.4
33°C/91.4°F
23.8
17.9
24.8
54.2
40.6
38°C/100.4°F
19.4
14.9
22.0
44.8
28.1
40°C/104.0°F
16.3
10.8
20.4
37.2
19.6
Note: a Temperature difference between melting point and crystallization temperature.
Fats and Oils Formulation
295
Table 4.8 Directed Interesterification of Vegetable Oils SFI Results Oil Source:
Safflower
Sunflower
Corn
Solids Fat Index 0°C/32°F
4.2
10.7
13.1
10.0°C/50°F
4.2
8.6
10.3
21.1°C/70°F
4.3
6.0
7.0
33.3°C/92°F
2.8
5.2
4.0
40.0°C/104°F
0.0
2.1
2.2
Reaction Conditions: Temperature, °C Catalyst
–10 1% diethyl sulfoxide
4.4.3.3 Directed Interesterification Directed interesterification is distinct from the random rearrangement of chemical and enzymatic processes. In directed interesterification, low temperature reaction conditions crystallize the trisaturated triglycerides and isolate them from the reaction. This selective crystallization upsets the equilibrium, and the reaction will produce more trisaturates to reestablish the equilibrium theoretically until all of the saturated fatty acids are converted to trisaturated triglycerides. This eventually results in two types of triglycerides: trisaturates (S3) and triunsaturates (U3). In most cases, directed interesterification increases the melting point because the melting point of a fat is dependent on the saturated triglyceride content. In effect, it is possible that this method can convert a liquid oil into a plastic product with the consistency of a margarine or shortening. Table 4.8 shows the effect of directed interesterification on three liquid oils: corn, safflower, and sunflower oil.79,80 Directed interesterification of blends can produce basestocks somewhat similar to those in a hydrogenated basestock system. Another potential basestock application would couple directed interesterification with fractionation to produce stocks rich in saturated and unsaturated fatty acids. The saturated fraction could replace a hydrogenated hardfat and the unsaturated fraction could qualify as a high stability oil depending on the original source oil or oil blend. 4.4.3.4 Fractionation Fractionation is another modification process capable of changing the melting characteristics of a fat or oil product without the production of trans fatty acids. Fractionation physically changes triglyceride ratios by separating oil into olein and stearin fractions. Initially, fractionation was employed to improve the cold stability of liquid oil by removing small amounts of solid materials, better known as winterization and dewaxing. A more sophisticated fraction process has evolved to separate fats or oils into liquid and solid fractions, both with distinct physical properties.
296
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Fractionation is basically a two-stage process. First, the oil is crystallized by cooling and then the liquid (olein) fraction is separated from the solid (stearin) fraction.81 Utilization of either the olein or the stearin fractions depends on the source oil and the efficiency of the fractionation process. Fractionation invariably produces one fraction that is more desirable than the other. For example, the olein fraction of cottonseed and palm oils are the premium products, while the stearin has less value and the opposite is true for lauric oil fractions where stearin is the premium fraction. Cottonseed and palm oil stearins can be utilized as basestocks for shortenings and margarines and the lauric oil olein fraction has been used as a basestock for mellorine (filling and icing shortenings). Improvements in fractionation technology have helped develop more efficient crystallization and filtration equipment to produce more desirable fractions. Membrane filters capable of operating at 5 to 30 bar have been developed that can provide a high liquid oil yield with a more saturated stearin fraction. This stearin fraction has a lower iodine value, higher melting point, and a steeper solids fat profile than those previously produced. The high-pressure filtration system requires a strong crystal; weak crystals tend to break down and partially fluidize with high pressure. The effect of the filtration differences on separation efficiency is illustrated by the product characteristics presented in Table 4.9.82,83 Fractionation has been utilized for the production of salad, cooking, deep-fat frying, and high stability oils, and basestocks for margarines, and shortenings. Table 4.9 Dry Fractionation Filtration Efficiency Feedstock: Partially Hydrogenated Soybean Oil Filtration System: Pressure: Olein fraction: Yield, % Iodine value Solids fat content 0°C–32°F 10°C–50°F Cloud point, °C Stearin fraction Yield, % Iodine value Melting point, °C Solids fat content 0°C/32°F 10°C/50°F 20°C/68°F 30°C/86°F 40°C/104°F
Membrane Filtration
Before
Vacuum
Fractionation
<1bar
5 bar
15 bar
25 bar
86.0
55.5 92.2
64.6 92.5
69.9 92.7
72.0 92.7
49.6 39.1 13.0
7.3 4.8 –7
7.0 5.1 –7.2
6.8 5.0 –7.4
7.1 5.4 –7.4
86.0 32.8
44.5 77.8 36.5
35.4 74.5 39.0
30.1 71.2 39.9
28 69.6 40.4
49.6 39.1 16.3 2.5 —
66.2 60.7 37.9 11.2 —
72.7 66.4 49.9 21.2 —
79.1 74.5 59.0 27.3 —
84.2 80.0 63.5 29.2 1.2
Fats and Oils Formulation
297
Table 4.10 Analytical Characteristics of Selected Fractionated Products Fraction
Feedstock
Analysis:
IV
CP, °C
MP, °C
Olein Yield
IV
Palm oil
52.0
21.0
41.0
80%
56.0
Palm oil
52.0
21.0
41.0
63%
60.0
Palm oil
52.0
21.0
41.0
50%
63.0
Palm olein
56.0
10.0
24.0
55%
Palm olein
53.0
2.5
—
45%
Palm stearin
41.0
—
47.0
Palm mid fraction
45.0
—
Palm kernel oil
18.0
—
PH-Soybean oil
115.0
PH-Soybean oil
Stearin IV
Number
—
32.0
54.0
Single
—
38.0
51.0
Single
2.5
—
41.0
47.0
Single
65.0
1.0
—
45.0
30.0
Double
69.0
–1.0
—
58.0
13.0
Double
70%
49.0
—
27.0
22.0
57.0
Double
32.0
53%
53.0
—
19.0
36.0
34.5
Triple
28.0
62%
25.0
—
24.0
7.0
a
32.0
Single
2.0
—
81%
119.0
–11.0
—
98.0
a
33.5
Single
109.0
6.5
—
77%
114.0
–10.0
—
92.0
a
34.5
Single
PH-Soybean oil
97.0
12.0
—
65%
104.0
–9.0
—
84.0
a
35.5
Single
PH-Soybean oil
85.0
15.5
—
53%
94.0
–7.0
—
75.0
a
36.5
Single
a
37.0
Single
52.0
Single
34.0
Double
58.0
Double
PH-Soybean oil
75.0
20.5
Tallow
47.0
—
a
Tallow olein
54.0
—
a
Tallow stearine
36.0
—
a
MP, °C
9.0 4.0
Stages
MP, °C
a
CP, °C
a
—
44%
84.0
–5.0
47.0
60%
54.0
—
a
—
68.0
31.0
36.0
a
31.0
50%
60.0
—
a
18.0
48.0
a
52.0
50%
48.0
—
a
34.0
25.0
a
Notes: IV = Iodine Value, CP = Cloud Point, MP = Melting Point, = Mettler Dropping Point, PH = Partially Hydrogenated. a
Table 4.10 reviews the product capabilities of dry fractionation with several different feedstocks.82 Variation of the feedstock materials and fractionation conditions can be combined to produce effective basestocks. 4.5 NUTRITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS The United States Congress enacted legislation to require specific, uniform nutrition labels for most processed foods was signed by President George H.W. Bush on November 8, 1990. The intent of the regulation was to give food processors an incentive to improve their product’s nutritional quality and help consumers develop more healthful diets. The Nutritional Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) of 1990 required that all FDA-regulated packaged foods, raw agriculture products, raw fish, and bulk foods be labeled in accordance with the new directives and limited food manufacture’s ability to make health or nutritional claims. This legislation required food labels to state (1) serving size, (2) number of servings, (3) nutritional information, including calories, calories from fat, total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, sodium, total carbohydrates, complex carbohydrates, sugars, dietary fiber, and total protein. The FDA was also directed to establish regulations to allow health claims supported
298
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
by scientific evidence and to disallow those that had not undergone review. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced that it would also require nutritional labeling on meat and poultry food products exempted from the NLEA legislation. This legislation was amended to require declaration of trans fatty acids on the nutritional facts panel effective January 1, 2006.84 4.5.1 Nutritional Facts Panel The code of federal regulations (CFR) is a codification of the general and permanent rules published in the federal register by the Executive departments and agencies of the U.S. federal government. The code title for food and drugs is 21, food for human consumption is covered in parts 100 through 200. The regulations for food labeling are covered in 21 CFR 101, the specifics for nutritional labeling are covered in 21 CFR 101.9. The nutrition facts requirements pertaining to fats and oils are summarized as follows:85
1. Nutrient information shall be presented on the Nutritional Facts panel in the following order: serving size, servings per container, calories per serving, calories from fat, total fat, saturated fat, trans fat, polyunsaturated fat, monounsaturated fat cholesterol, sodium, total carbohydrates, protein. Reasonable deficiencies from the label claims of 20% overage are allowed within the Good Manufacturing Practices.86 2. Servings: Serving sizes must be based on FDA’s “Reference Amounts Customarily Consumed Per Eating Occasion” lists — 2000 calories in most cases. The serving sizes must be listed in common household measures, such as cup, tablespoons, and ounces as well as in metric measurements. 3. Calories: The calorie information required is calories per serving and calories from fat. Calories from saturated fat is a voluntary declaration. A general factor of 9 calories per gram may be used for fat calorie calculations, or specific factors approved by FDA, or those available in USDA Handbook No. 74. The calorie values should be reported to the nearest 5-calorie increment up to 50 calories and nearest 10-calorie increment above 50 calories, except that amounts less than 5 calories may be reported as zero. 4. Fat: The required fat and or fatty acid information is total fat, saturated fat, and trans fat — polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fat reporting is voluntarily unless a fatty acid or cholesterol claim is made on the label. The values reported are grams per serving. The amounts for each shall be reported to the nearest 0.5gram increment below 5 grams and to the nearest gram increment above 5 grams. Servings containing less than 0.5 gram should be reported as zero. Total fat, saturated fat, and cholesterol must also have a declaration of their Daily Value (DV). Definitions for each of the fat categories and the DV where applicable are a. Total fat is the total fatty lipids or triglycerides — DV is <65 grams for a 2000 calorie diet and <80 grams for a 2500 calorie diet. b. Saturated fat is the sum of the fatty acids containing no double bonds — DV is <20 grams for a 2000 calorie diet and <25 grams for a 2500 calorie diet. c. Trans fat is the sum of all unsaturated fatty acids that contain one or more isolated or nonconjugated double bonds in a trans configuration — the word
Fats and Oils Formulation
299
“trans” may be italicized to indicate its Latin origin — no DV has been identified for trans fatty acids. d. Polyunsaturated fat is defined as cis, cis-methylene-interrupted polyunsaturated fatty acids — no DV has been identified for polyunsaturated fatty acids. e. Monounsaturated fat is the cis-monounsaturated fatty acids — no DV has been identified for monounsaturated fatty acids 5. Cholesterol: Cholesterol content in a serving is expressed in milligrams to the nearest 5-milligram increment, except that a label declaration is not required for products that contain less than 2 milligrams and make no claim about fat, fatty acids, or cholesterol content, or products that list the cholesterol content as zero. The DV for cholesterol is <300 mg for both the 2000- and 2500-calorie diets. If cholesterol content is not required and not declared, the statement, “Not a significant source of cholesterol,” shall be placed at the bottom of the table of nutrient values.
4.5.2 Health Claims The NLEA defined health claims as “statements concerning reducing the risk, or forestalling the premature onset, of certain chronic serious disease conditions (e.g., coronary heart disease, high blood pressure, cancer, osteoporosis) through changes in the diet.” The FDA was specifically directed to establish regulations on permissible health claims and to disallow all health claims that have not undergone review by the FDA. In 1997, the FDA Modernization Act (FDAMA) provided for health claims based on an authoritative statement of a scientific body of the U.S. government or the National Academy of Sciences. In 2003, the FDA Consumer Health Information for Better Nutrition Initiative provided an expedited, abbreviated process for health statements based on emerging human research.87 Some of the FDA approved fats and oils health claims for food products include:
21 CFR 101.73: A diet low in total fat may reduce the risk of some cancers — a low fat product is defined as containing 3 grams or less total fat per serving or less than 3% total fat — Model claim: “Development of cancer depends on many factors. A diet low in total fat may reduce the risk of some cancers.”88 21 CFR 101.75: Diets low in saturated fatty acids and cholesterol may reduce the risk of heart disease. The restrictions that apply are that the food must contain less than 20 mg per serving of cholesterol, less than 1 gram of saturated fatty acids, and fewer than 15% of calories from saturated fatty acids. Model claim: “While many factors affect heart disease, diets low in saturated fat and cholesterol may reduce the risk of this disease.”89 21 CFR 101.83: Sterol or stanol health claim: (1) <1.3 grams of vegetable oil sterol esters or (2) <3.4 grams of plant stanol esters may reduce the risk of heart disease. Model claim: “Diets low in saturated fat and cholesterol that include two servings of foods that provide a daily total of at least [either 3.4 grams of plant stanol esters or 1.3 grams of vegetable oil sterol esters] may reduce the risk of heart disease. A serving of [food product name] supplies ___ grams of (either) plant sterol or stanol esters.”90 EPA/DHA combination excellent source claim: The product must contain at least 32 mg of EPA and DHA per serving and include the statement “contains ____mg
300
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
of EPA and DHA per serving, which is ___% of the 160 mg daily value for a combination of EPA and DHA. The other restrictions that apply are that the food must contain less than 20 mg per serving of cholesterol, less than 1 gram of saturated fatty acids, and fewer than 15% of calories from saturated fatty acids. The FDA cautioned that consumers should not exceed 2 grams per day of EPA and DHA fatty acids as a safeguard against increased bleeding time, increased LDL cholesterol, and glycemic control for noninsulin-dependent diabetics. Manufactures may choose one of three claims: (1) An excellent source of omega-3 EPA and DHA,” “High in omega-3 EPA and DHA,” or “Rich in omega-3 EPA and DHA.”91
4.5.3 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans Additional nutritional legislation was also enacted in 1990 to establish a National Nutrition Monitoring Advisory Council and to publish a comprehensive report every five years entitled Dietary Guidelines for Americans. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Agriculture jointly published the revised report in January, 2005.92 The recommendations and conclusions on fat consumption were:
1. A minimum fat consumption of 20% of calories for adequate vitamin E and essential fatty acids. 2. Total fat should not exceed 35% of calories to help reduce obesity. 3. Three measures were recommended to reduce the effects of elevated serum LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular heart disease: a. Limit saturated fatty acids to less than 10% of calories. b. Limit trans fatty acids as much as possible; the report indicated a trans fatty acid level of 1% of energy or less, but this limit was not included in the final recommendations. c. Limit dietary cholesterol intake to less than 300 mg per day. 4. The current mean intake of omega-6 essential fatty acids of 5 to 10% of calories are within the range of beneficial effects on mortality from coronary artery disease. 5. α-linolenic fatty acid intake between 0.6 to 1.2% of calories will meet the requirement for this fatty acid and may provide some protection against cardiovascular disease. Consumption of two servings of fish, rich in EPA and DHA fatty acids, per week is suggested to reduce the risk of both sudden death and cardiovascular heart disease. Further research is expected to show that other sources of EPA and DHA provide similar benefits. 6. Substitution of monounsaturated for saturated and/or trans fatty acids results in a decrease in LDL cholesterol.
4.5.4 Package Ingredient Statement All information required on the label of a food package must appear prominently and conspicuously either on the principal or information panels unless otherwise specified.93 The label information includes the Nutrition Facts panel and a full list of ingredients. Each ingredient required on a food label must be listed as prescribed by 21 CFR 101.4.94 Fat or oil ingredients shall be declared by their specific common
Fats and Oils Formulation
301
or usual name in the order of predominance for liquid oils, shortenings, margarines, and other products in which fats and oils are the predominant ingredient. If the fat or oil is hydrogenated, the name shall include the term hydrogenated and indicate the degree. Hydrogenated indicates complete hydrogenation; partially hydrogenated is the identification for all less than complete hydrogenations. Technically, a fat or oil listed as hydrogenated would have a zero IV and all other hydrogenated products should be identified as partially hydrogenated. A completely hydrogenated fat with a zero iodine value would not have any unsaturated fatty acids that could be in the trans configuration. A listing of hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated oil in an ingredient statement has acquired a stigma meaning that the product contains trans fatty acids. The press has advised consumers that the word hydrogenated in the ingredient statement means that the food product contains trans fatty acids irregardless of the listing on the nutritional facts panel.95 4.6 BASESTOCK SYSTEM Fats and oils processors could formulate products so that a special base fat or series of base fats is required for each different product. This practice, with the everincreasing number of finished products, can result in a scheduling nightmare, with a large number of product heels tying up tank space and inventory. Many U.S. fats and oils processors practice a basestock system utilizing a limited number of modified stock products for blending to meet the finished product requirements. The advantages provided by a basestock system are twofold:96-98
1. Control a. Blending of modified oil batches to average or eliminate minor variations. b. Improved uniformity by producing the same basestock more often. c. Reduction of cross-product contamination by scheduling more of the same product consecutively. d. Reduction of product deviations from attempts to utilize finished product heels. e. Elimination of rework created by heel deterioration before use. 2. Efficiency a. Scheduling of modification processes to maintain basestock inventories, rather than reacting to customer orders. b. Modification of full batches instead of some smaller batches to meet demands without creating excessive heels. c. Better order reaction time for superior customer service.
Basestock requirements will vary, depending on the customer base served, which obviously dictates the finished product mix. A wide variety of source oils is available that could be used for basestocks; however, the choices are narrowed first by product performance and then by other factors, such as customer specifications, costs, nutritional requirements, religious prohibitions, traditional preferences, crop economics,
302
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
legislation, transportation, and others. These factors have favored soybean oil in the United States for several decades. Therefore, most U.S. fats and oils processors have had basestock systems dominated by soybean oil with somewhat minor representation by the other source oils. The other oils in most basestock systems normally served as β-prime promoters for plasticity, such as palm oil, cottonseed oil, and tallow or those source oils required for a specific or specialty product preparation. Table 4.11 outlines a hydrogenated soybean and cottonseed oil basestock system designed for margarine and shortening production. This system has nine hydrogenated basestocks, ranging from a brush hydrogenated 109 IV soybean oil basestock to saturated soybean and cottonseed oil hardfats with an 8 IV maximum. A tenth base oil, not shown, is refined and bleached soybean oil, the same oil that serves as the feedstock for the soybean oil hydrogenated basestocks. Utilization of a similar basestock system should enable the processor to meet most product requirements for fats and oils by blending two or more basestocks, except for some specialty products that can be made only with a special process, catalyst, or source oil. Blending of hydrogenated or natural fat and oil components has been the common practice for the formulation of most of the shortenings, margarines, and specialty products in the United States. These basestocks could be augmented or replaced with interesterified or fractionated fats and oils components if the processor wanted to avoid trans fatty acids. List and Reeves99 have identified an interesterified oil basestock composed of a 50:50 mixture of liquid soybean oil and zero IV soybean oil stearine. Blends of this basestock with liquid soybean oil have produced SFI profiles similar to typical all-purpose shortening prepared from hydrogenated basestocks. Indications are that this interesterified basestock may have application for margarine oil formulations as well. The use of the basestock blending techniques provides the means for developing fats and oils products with an extremely wide range of potential physical properties. Figure 4.2 graphically depicts the diverse SFI results for five products to illustrate the variation of percentage of solid material caused by composition and temperature for different applications. 4.7 SOLIDS–LIQUIDS CHARACTERISTICS The different triglycerides present in fats and oils are the main building blocks for application. The primary functions of fats and oils in a food product are lubricity and structure. Lubricity describes imparted tenderness and additions to the richness and improved eating properties of foods; lubricity also provides the feeling of satiety after eating. Structural properties of fats and oils affect the consistency of foods through aeration, creaming properties, melting behavior, spreadability, moisture retention, moisture barrier, and other functionalities. The functional properties for fats and oils products can be directly related to the types of triglycerides in the system. As reviewed earlier, the triglyceride types are determined by the fatty acid composition and distribution on the individual triglycerides. Table 4.3 identifies the liquidity zones and functionality characteristics for the triglycerides in fats or fat blends made up of palmitic, stearic, oleic, and linoleic fatty acids. As indicated, the
— 25.3
68.2 15.2 — 22.7
44.3 37.7 2.8 14.8
300 325 3.0 to 4.0 0.01 to 0.02 fixed
Brush
72.0 10.9
— 10.2 — 6.4
— 10.8 — 4.4
0.7 to 0.08 0.04 to 0.08 fixed
4.0 0.04 to 0.08 fixed
0.7 to 1.0 0.04 to 0.08 fixed
0.02 fixed
fixed
4.0 0.07 to 0.08
300 450
Hardfat
— nil — 25.7 Steep
4.3 —
23.2 — 71.3
0.7
49 ± 1
b b
b b b
<8 b
62.6 6.2
0.7 22.6 0.5 7.0
47 ± 3 30 ± 3 — 10.5 ± 2.5 — —
65 38.5 ± 1.5
1.3 to 1.5
Hardfat
— — nil
1.7
— 10.5 — 86.9
b b b b b 52 ± 2
<8 b
300 440
— 45.0
66.3 2.2
— 10.7 — 20.8
68 ± 3 59 ± 3 54 ± 3 40 ± 3 16 ± 2 —
60 46.5 ± 1.5
Hardfat
Cottonseed Oil Steep
300 450
Steep
— 45.5
70.7 3.1
— 10.7 — 15.2
62 ± 3 50 ± 3 45 ± 3 26 ± 3 6±3 —
66 43 ± 3
Hardfat
300 440
— 44.7
75.0 5.9
— 10.9 — 8.2
41 ± 3 24 ± 3 16 ± 3 <3.5 — —
74 35 ± 1
Steep
Soybean Oil
300 350
Flat
— 10.1 — 7.0
25 ± 2 12 ± 3 5±1 — — —
18 ± 3 8±2 3±1 — — —
4 max 2 max — — — —
80 33 ± 2
85 30 ± 2
Flat
109 a
Brush
Notes: a = too soft; b = too hard to analyze; c = optimum conditions will vary dependent upon the converter, agitation, hydrogen gas purity, etc.; t = including trans fatty acids.
Gassing temperature, °F Hydrogenation temperature, °F Pressure, bar Catalyst, % nickel Agitation
Hydrogenation Conditions: c
C-18:2 Linoleict C-18:3 Linolenict Trans isomers, %
Iodine value Mettler dropping point, °C Solids fat index: 50°F/10.0°C 70°F/21.1°C 80°F/26.7°C 92°F/33.3° 104°F/40.0°C Quick titer, °C Fatty acid composition, % C-14:0 Myristic C-16:0 Palmitic C-16:1 Palmitoleic C-18:0 Stearic C-18:1 Oleict
Basestock Type
Source Oil
Table 4.11 Hydrogenated Soybean and Cottonseed Oils Basestock System
Fats and Oils Formulation 303
304
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
80.0 70.0 Solids Fat Index
60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0
50°F
60°F
70°F
80°F
92°F
104°F
Temperature Liquid Shortening
All-Purpose Shortening.
Frying Shortening
Confectioners Fat
Margarine Oil
Figure 4.2 Typical product solid fat index curves.
trisaturated triglycerides in liquidity zone 4 provide structure and limited lubricity. Zone 3 triglycerides provide structure and improved lubricity because they are solid at room temperature, but melt at body temperature. Zone l and 2 triglycerides provide only lubricity because of their liquid state at room and chilled temperatures. Vegetable oils of the oleic–linoleic and linolenic fatty acid groups have no inherent structural characteristics because they do not contain any significant quantities of triglycerides represented by zones 3 and 4; however, these structural aspects can be built into the oils with hydrogenation, interesterification, or fractionation. The flexibility of the modification techniques provides a wide variety of structures that can be further modified through blending to provide the solids-to-liquid ratios required for the varied applications. Because the main building blocks of fats and oils products are the different triglycerides present, the most exact means to develop a functional product would be to control the triglyceride composition. This approach to formulation requires qualitative knowledge of the triglyceride composition of each individual fat or oil product available for use. This method also assumes that sources for the identified triglyceride structures are available or can be obtained from the source fats and oils available or with processing. A further assumption is that the desired triglycerides can be isolated in sufficient purity to effect the desired functionality. Finally, these components must be available at costs that are competitive with other products available for the same application. The byproducts created during processing to obtain the desired components may either improve the economics or contribute a prohibitive cost. Approaches to formulations of fat systems based on replication of triglyceride compositions have achieved some success, but have been primarily limited to
Fats and Oils Formulation
305
cocoa butter equivalents, where the natural product commands a premium price.100 However, technology improvements have made this technique more feasible. Most product formulation development of fats and oils is based on an understanding of the relationships between the specific physical requirements and the compositions of the fats and oils blends and their components, plus an appreciation of the processing effects. This formulation approach requires an identification of the key functional attributes the fat system is expected to provide and the use of historical knowledge to identify the properties that are most likely to produce the identified performances. It is important to identify the primary and secondary functional attributes and to disregard properties that are unimportant to the end-use product. Efficient utilization of this formulation approach for new fats and oils products is the systematic evaluation of the ability of the fat modification system to meet the key primary and secondary functionality requirements. Although triglyceride composition is important to both formulation approaches, the performance evaluation technique usually offers more than one potential solution. This provides the processor with the latitude to choose the most practical product composition and processing sequence plus the ability to interchange source fats and oils when necessary. Therefore, most fats and oils products are identified and formulated according to usage and performance. The SFI curves in Figure 4.2 illustrate the differences in plastic range formulated to perform the desired function for several different food products. The product with the very flat SFI slope is a fluid opaque or pumpable liquid shortening that has become popular because of the convenience offered, handling, cost savings in some situations, and lower saturated fatty acid levels. These products are normally formulated with β-crystal forming base oils and hardstock to produce and maintain fluidity. Solidified products with the flattest SFI curves have the widest plastic range for workability at cool temperatures, as well as elevated temperatures. The all-purpose shortening has the widest plastic range of the solidified products. The confectioner’s fat and the frying shortening presented in Figure 4.2 have relatively steep SFI curves and will provide a firm, brittle consistency at room temperature, but will be fluid at body temperature or only slightly elevated temperatures for good mouth feel. 4.7.1 Wide Plastic-Range Fats and Oils Products The basic all-purpose formulation has been the building block for shortenings and margarines where creaming properties, a wide working range, and heat tolerance are important. The functionality of an all-purpose product at any temperature is largely a function of the solids content at that temperature. The all-purpose products are formulated to be not too firm at 50 to 60°F (10 to 15.6°C) and not too soft at 90 to 100°F (32.2 to 37.8°C). Initially, a liquid was blended with a hard fat to make a compound shortening that had a very flat SFI curve, which provided an excellent plastic range similar to, but slightly firmer than, the liquid shortening SFI curve illustrated in Figure 4.2. However, the low oxidative stability of these shortenings precluded their use for most products requiring a long shelf life. Currently, most of these products are formulated with a nonselectively hydrogenated soybean oil basestock and
306
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
a low IV cottonseed or palm oil hardstock. β′ hardfats are added to shortenings to extend the plastic range, which improves tolerance to high temperatures, and for crystal type and stability, The β′-crystal-forming cottonseed oil hardstock functions as a plasticizer for improved creaming properties, texture, and consistency. Hydrogenation of a fat and oil basestock increases the oxidative stability. As a rule, the lower the base IV the better the oxidative stability; however, as base hardness is increased, the level of hardstock required to reach a desired consistency decreases. Hardstock reduction reduces the plastic range and heat tolerance. Therefore, oxidative stability improvements are achieved at the expense of plasticity, and a wide plastic range can be achieved at the expense of oxidative stability. The extent to which one attribute can be compromised to improve another must be determined by the requirements of the intended food product. It should also be remembered that oxidative stability is directly related to the level and type of unsaturated fatty acids present; therefore, oxidative stability results do not average. For example, a 50:50 blend of a 40-hour AOM basestock and a 100-hour AOM basestock will not have an AOM stability of 70 hours, but rather will be closer to the basestock with the lower AOM stability.98 Plastic range is important for bakery-use fats and oils products intended for roll-in and creaming applications alike because of the consistency changes with temperature. Fats ands oils products become brittle above the plastic range and soft below the plastic range; both conditions adversely affect creaming and workability alike. Shortenings and margarines are normally plastic and workable at SFI values between 15 and 25. Hence, products with flatter SFI slopes fall within the plasticity window for a much greater temperature range than those with steep SFI slopes. The all-purpose shortening in Figure 4.2 has a 42°F (23°C) plastic range from 50 to 92°F (10 to 33.3°C), whereas the frying shortening should have equivalent workability if used within the 7°F (4°C) range from 85 to 92°F (29 to 33°C). Use of the frying shortening as a roll-in would require very strict controlled-temperature use, a condition probably not available in bakeries and a temperature detrimental to the laminated baked product. The 42°F working range for the all-purpose product is decidedly more practical. Two of the soybean oil basestocks outlined previously in Table 4.6 are designed for products requiring a wide plastic range (e.g., the nonselective hydrogenated 80- and 85-IV basestocks). Even these two basestocks, with only a 5-IV difference between them, exhibit measurable differences in plastic range and stability when cottonseed oil hardfat is added to produce equivalent consistencies at 80°F (26.7°C). The softer 85-IV basestock requires 2.5% more hardfat to achieve the targeted 20% SFI at 80°F (26.7°C). The higher hardfat requirement indicates a better heat resistance and a wider plastic range, but a lower AOM stability as determined by the higher IV of the basestock. The firmer 80-IV basestock requires 2.5% less hardfat to provide the 20% SFI at 80°F (26.7°C) and reduces the plastic range by 8°F (4.5°C), but increases the AOM stability to 100 hours versus the 65 hours for the shortening with the 85-IV basestock. Figure 4.3 graphically illustrates the differences in plastic range caused by the slight change in basestocks. The effect of hardstock on the SFI slope and plastic range is illustrated by Figure 4.4. Cottonseed oil hardfat was added to 85-IV hydrogenated soybean oil
Fats and Oils Formulation
307
35
Solids Fat Index
30 25 20 15 10 5 0
0
50°F
60°F
70°F Temperature
85 IV Plus Hardfat 80 IV Base
80°F
92°F
80 IV Plus Hardfat Plastic Range
104°F
85 IV Base Plastic Range
Figure 4.3 Basestock effect on plastic range.
35.0
Solids Fat Index
30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0
50°F
60°F
70°F
80°F
92°F
104°F
Temperature None
5% Hardfat
10% Hardfat
Figure 4.4 Hardfat effect on solid fat index slope.
15% Hardfat
20% Hardfat
308
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
basestock to demonstrate the plasticizer effect. As the hardfat level is increased, the shortening becomes firmer with a flatter slope. The highest hardfat levels are used to formulate roll-in applications, puff pastry fats, and other products where a plastic, but firm, consistency is required for performance. The use of a partially hydrogenated base plus hardfat to produce a wide plastic range with good creaming properties has been expanded into an entire family of specialized shortening, margarine, and special-purpose products. The development of these products has involved the selection of the most suitable hydrogenated basestock and hardfat to produce the desired plastic range and AOM stability. These developments have taken two directions: (1) addition of an emulsifier or an emulsifier system to an all-purpose fat and oil base, or (2) formulating nonemulsified products for a specific functionality. Some of the current applications for these two categories include the following: Wide Plastic Range Applications Nonemulsified
Emulsified
All-purpose
Household
Danish pastry
Cake and icing
Puff pastry
Icing and filling
Cookie
Specialty cake
Pie dough
Yeast raised
Donut frying
4.7.2 Steep Solid Fat Index Slopes Plasticity is of minor importance and can be a detriment for products requiring sharp melting characteristics or high oxidative stability. Fats and oils products specially designed for specific frying situations, table-grade margarines and spreads, nondairy systems, cookie fillers, and confectionery fats require an eating character and flavor stability not possible with blends of nonselectively hydrogenated oils with hard fats. These products require as low an iodine value as possible for oxidative stability with a steep SFI slope to provide a melting point lower than body temperature for good eating characteristics. The steep SFI curves can be obtained in two ways: (1) Nature has provided lauric oils, which have a steep SFI and a sharp melting point; and (2) most liquid oils can be selectively hydrogenated to provide the desired solids melting relationships. Selective hydrogenation is a progressive diminution of the most unsaturated fatty acid groups. Good or high selectivity exists when fatty acids with three double bonds are nearly all reduced to two double bonds, before those with two bonds are nearly all reduced to one before the monounsaturates are saturated.101 The progression of a selectively hydrogenated soybean oil can be observed in Figures 4.5 and 4.6. The fatty acid changes described above can be tracked in Figure 4.5. In a typical partial hydrogenation of soybean or canola oils, trans-isomer content can rise to as high as 55%, mainly as trans-oleic (elaidic) fatty acid. The trans forms of the
Fats and Oils Formulation
309
80.0
Fatty Acid Percent
70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 100
90
80 Iodine Value
C-18:0 Fatty Acids
C-18:1 Fatty Acids
C-18:3 Fatty Acids
Trans Fatty Acids
70
60 C-18:2 Fatty Acids
Figure 4.5 Selective hydrogenated soybean oil fatty acid composition profile.
80.0 70.0 Solids Fat Index
60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0
50°F
60°F
70°F
80°F
92°F
104°F
Temperature 60 IV
70 IV
80 IV
90 IV
Figure 4.6 Selective hydrogenated soybean oil solid fat index (SFI) profile.
100 IV
310
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
essential fatty acids are minimal, as linolenic fatty acid is selectively converted to linoleic, which, in turn, is selectively converted to oleic fatty acid. The effect of the progressive saturation and isomerization to change the SFI is plotted in Figure 4.6. Three of the fats and oils products shown in Figure 4.2 (stick margarine oil, frying shortening, and confectioner’s fat) all rely on steep SFI slopes for the preferred performance characteristics. A table-grade margarine oil must provide somewhat unique physical requirements in that it must have a plastic consistency with a relatively sharp melting point. Consumers expect a margarine to melt rapidly in the mouth for a full flavor release, to be immediately spreadable out of the refrigerator, and to maintain a solid consistency for prolonged periods on the dinner table. These characteristics are provided with a blend of liquid oils or a soft basestock with selectively hydrogenated basestocks. Formulation of margarine oils with multiple components has provided improved product consistencies and, along with good refrigerated storage conditions, has allowed the production of margarines and spreads with 100% soybean oil basestocks, which usually convert rapidly to the β-crystal form. The combined multiple components, high trans acid basestocks, and consistent cool temperature environment have slowed the crystallization rate enough to maintain the β′-crystal form for the life of the product. The stick margarine oil SFI curve in Figure 4.2 was formulated with the multiple-component, high trans concept: 60% unhardened liquid soybean oil, 25% 74-IV hydrogenated soybean oil (H-SBO) basestock, and 15% 66IV H-SBO basestock. The basestocks utilized represent the peak trans-isomer development for steep SFI slopes, as represented in Figure 4.5, which provides the product with a solid appearance at less than body temperature while facilitating rapid melting in the mouth.102 The frying shortening illustrated meets restaurant industry requirements for stable heat-transfer media that become a part of the food to supply texture and mouth feel and to enhance the food flavor. Solid frying shortenings are usually composed of a single hydrogenated base or possibly two selectively hydrogenated bases for a slightly different slope than is available with a single base. Both have high solids at the lower temperature readings, but they fall off rapidly to a low melting point for the desired eating characteristics or mouth feel with excellent oxidative and frying stability. For example, the frying shortening in Figure 4.2 is composed of single hydrogenated soybean oil, a 68-IV selectively hydrogenated product; however, it can also be produced by blending the 66- and 74-IV soybean oil basestocks detailed in Table 4.5. Confectionery fats require a very steep SFI curve to make them brittle with a short melting range that ensures a quick meltdown and a pleasant mouth feel. These fats, formulated to resemble the characteristics of cocoa butter, are usually referred to as hard butter. Quality hard butters have a relatively high SFI at room temperature of above 50%, as lower levels can provide a greasy or tacky feel. The SFI then falls off quickly for a complete melt for most products at 95 to 102°F (35 to 39.2°C). Processes used to prepare hard butters include hydrogenation, interesterification, solvent and dry fractionation, and blending. The hard butters can utilize both lauric and nonlauric source oils. The principal types of hard butters include:
Fats and Oils Formulation
311
1. Cocoa butter equivalent (CBE): A CBE is prepared from nonhydrogenated specialty fats containing the same fatty acids and symmetrical unsaturated triglycerides as cocoa butter. Careful blending of selected fractions from selected source oils is required to duplicate the triglyceride structure of cocoa butter. 2. Lauric cocoa butter substitute (CBS): The most widely used lauric oils are palm kernel oil and coconut oil, which may be processed several different ways (i.e., hydrogenated, fractionated, hydrogenated and interesterified, hydrogenated and fractionated, or hydrogenated–interesterifiedfractionated). 3. Nonlauric CBS: Domestic hard butters are usually blends of soybean and cottonseed oils, but have also been produced with palm, peanut, corn, safflower, and sunflower oils. The nonlauric confectionery fats may be divided into two types: a. Selectively hydrogenated: Oils with high levels of unsaturation may be selectively hydrogenated utilizing a sulfur-treated catalyst to produce a high transisomer level and by minimizing stearic fatty acid development to optimize solids development at room temperature while maintaining a melting point only slightly higher than body temperature. b. Fractionated selectively hydrogenated: The nonlauric fractions selected for hard butters have high SFI contents at room temperature with a better flavor release than the nonfractionated products.
The confectionery fat example plotted in Figure 4.2 is the stearin fraction of partially hydrogenated palm kernel oil. It was designed for confectioner’s chocolate and pastel coatings, confectioner’s drops, and candy centers, but has also found application in nondairy, bakery, and other food products. 4.7.3 Liquid Opaque or Pumpable Products Fluid shortening and margarine products are usually suspensions of hardfats, emulsifiers, other additives, or combinations in liquid oils formulated to be pourable or pumpable at room temperature and stable in storage over a range of temperatures. Plastic fat systems have played a dominant role in the preparation of baked, fried, and other food products, due to the performance supplied by the plastic consistency. Emulsifiers, other additives, and hardfats must assume these functions with the fluid fats and oils products. The technologies involved in the development of a fluid fats and oils system include:
1. Base oil technology: Hardfats are a crucial functional property necessary for the development of the crystal structure for suspension stability and crumb strength in bakery and other prepared food products, but too high a solids content limits the fluidity of the system. The liquid oil employed may be a refined and bleached, brush hydrogenated, or a high oleic, genetically modified oil depending on the oxidative stability requirements of the finished product. 2. Additive technology: Liquid or flowable functional additives include emulsifiers, antifoamers, antioxidants, flavors, colors, antisticking agents, etc. The required additives may have unique crystalline properties that must be compatible with the base oils to prevent separation or gelation. 3. Processing technology: The processing techniques utilized to crystallize the fluid fats and oils products may need to be adjusted for the different product compositions or vice versa.
312
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Basically, all liquid opaque, squeezable, or pumpable fats and oils products are flowable suspensions of solid fats in liquid oil with or without additives. The liquid phase may or may not be hydrogenated depending on the consistency and oxidative stability requirements of the final product. Normally, a low iodine value, β-forming hardfat is used to seed crystallization for shortening products. The quantity can vary from as low as 1.0% to higher levels (usually no more than 10%), as required to produce the desired finished product viscosity. The liquid opaque shortening plotted in Figure 4.2 is typical of a fluid bread shortening formulated with 10% soybean hardfat crystallized in 90% unhardened soybean oil. The ease with which β-crystal hardfats convert to the stable β-crystal form makes them ideal for liquid shortening products; the β-crystals do not intertwine to form a matrix that can enmesh the liquid phase to affect a thicker product. However, liquid margarine oil products have been described in the patent literature using either β- or β′-type hardfats. Unlike liquid shortenings, β′-crystallizing hardfats are suitable for postcrystallization of a fluid margarine product after packaging. Liquid margarine products formulated with β hardfats are more fluid, but must be crystallized before packaging.70 4.8 EMULSIFICATION The emulsifying properties of fats and oils products can be enhanced with adjustments of the fat structure and the addition of surface-active agents. Food emulsifiers supplement, broaden, and intensify the functionality of shortening, margarine, or specialty fat products. Emulsifiers are amphiphilic substances that possess both hydrophilic and lipophilic properties. This dual affinity results in the alignment of the emulsifiers at the interface between two normally immiscible substances to form a bond or an emulsion between the two. In addition to forming emulsions, the surface-active agents, or surfactants, perform a range of functions that, in some products, are unrelated to emulsification. The functions contributed by emulsifiers in prepared foods include the following: • Emulsifier: Promotes the combination of oil and water in a compatible dispersion for both water-in-oil and oil-in-water • Emulsion stabilizer: Extends the emulsion stability in dressings, sauces, frozen desserts, and nondairy products • Antistaling agent: Extends the shelf life of baked products by forming complexes with the starch molecule; a soft crumb provides a soft feel (the traditional U.S. consumer’s test for bread freshness) • Aerator: Entrains air cells in batters, icings, toppings, and other food products • Texturizer: Modifies the extensibility of protein to influence the texture of bread and cake products • Lubricator: Provides a higher degree of lubricity to impart “slip” or lubrication properties • Defoamer: Stabilize food products or helps break undesirable emulsions • Dispersant: Reduces interfacial tension to affect solids, liquids, and gas dispersions
Fats and Oils Formulation
• • • • • • • •
313
Moisture barrier: Emulsifies moisture to protect against loss during storage Oxygen barrier: Protects less stable ingredients from oxidation Crystal modifier: Modifies polymorphic form, size, and growth rate of fat crystals Carrier: Acts as solubilizer or dispersant for flavors, colors, and other fat-insoluble additives Stickiness or tackiness reducer: Functions as a lubricant to reduce the tendency of a food product to stick to teeth, wrappers, or cutting knives Wetting agent: Reduces interfacial tension between liquid and solid surfaces to cause the liquid to spread more evenly over surfaces Agglomeration agent: Controls coagulation of fat particles in a liquid Palatability improver: Emulsifies fat system to enhance eating quality
Obviously, no single emulsifier or emulsifier system can perform all of these different functions. A surfactant that will act as an emulsifier for one product or formula may cause instability in others. Propensities of the various types of emulsifiers to exhibit the previously listed properties vary with their chemical structures. Many of the food emulsifiers produced either are derivatives of the first synthetic emulsifier used commercially (mono- and diglycerides) or utilize an alcohol other than glycerine to produce the surface-active agent with a somewhat different functionality. The emulsifier types most often used for food applications include: • • • • • • •
Mono- and diglycerides Propylene glycol esters Sorbitan esters Polyoxyethylene sorbitan esters Polyglycerol esters Lactated esters Lecithin
For the selection of the proper emulsifier system, the developer must consider the usage, preparation method, emulsion type, effects of the other ingredients, economics, and any other applicable criteria for the prepared food product. It is important to clearly identify the properties and required processing of food products when the emulsifier systems of fats and oils products are being designed to help them function as desired. The following is a checklist to help identify the factors influencing the selection of an emulsifier system:103
1. Functional requirements of the food product 2. Method of processing (e.g., homogenizing, pasteurizing, whipping, cooking, baking, fermentation, pumping, extruding, dry blending) 3. Finished product form, (e.g., liquid, powder, solid, gel, dispersion, emulsion and type, foam) 4. Consumer preparation technique 5. Storage requirements 6. Flavor and mouth feel 7. Formulation (effect of the other ingredients) 8. Economics 9. Legal requirements
314
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
4.8.1 Mono- and Diglycerides The roles and functional contributions of the emulsifiers in each different application are not always instantly identifiable; however, emulsifier system selection is simplified after all the functionality requirements are recognized. The next step for selection of the best emulsifier system is to review the functionality of the available surfactants. Mono- and diglycerides were the first fatty emulsifiers to be added to foods. These emulsifiers were first used in margarine for Danish pastry and puff pastry shortening. The first U.S. patents for mono -and diglycerides was granted in 1938 and illustrated the usefulness of surfactants in emulsions and margarine.104 Monoglycerides with only one fatty acid attached to a glycerol molecule and two free hydroxyl groups on the glycerol take on the properties of both fats and water. The fatty acid portion of the molecule acts like any other fat and readily mixes with the fatty materials, and the two hydroxyl groups mix or dissolve in water, thus monoglycerides tend to hold fats and water together. Cake shortenings with increased aerating and creaming properties, as well as better moisture retention properties contributed by the addition of mono- and diglycerides, were introduced in 1933. Soon after, fats and oils products with shelf life-extension properties for yeast-raised products provided by mono- and diglycerides were introduced to bread bakers.104 Mono- and diglycerides are still the most commonly used emulsifiers in the food industry and account for about 70% of the emulsifier usage. These surfactants are required in almost every type of processed food product. The major usage is bakery products, prepared mixes, margarines, convenience foods, and frozen desserts. Normally, they are used as a part of a fat product and frequently in conjunction with other emulsifiers. Their lipophilic character causes them to be excellent water-in-oil emulsifiers, as required for margarines. At room temperature, mono- and diglycerides are insoluble in water and have a very limited solubility in oil, except at elevated temperatures. Mono- and diglycerides are produced in three concentration levels: 40 to 46% α monoglyceride; 52% minimum α-monoglyceride; and distilled, or 90% monoglyceride content. They are available in a wide range of physical forms: liquids, semiliquid, soft plastic, flakes, beads, or powders. The three general physical forms of hard, plastic, and soft have an effect on the functionality of the mono- and diglyceride emulsifiers. As detailed in Table 4.12, the soft to liquid forms of the mono- and diglycerides produce good aeration properties for low-moisture applications, whereas the hard form exhibits good baked product structure and shelf-lifeextension properties. The intermediate hardness or plastic emulsifiers are the easiest to handle separately, but provide compromise functionalities of the hard and soft mono- and diglycerides. Mono- and diglycerides are on the generally recognized as safe (GRAS) list of the Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR 182.4505), and the levels of use are limited to application requirements and standards of identity, where applicable.105 The three different concentration levels of emulsifiers (43%, 52%, and 90%) can normally be used interchangeably and added on the basis of the α-monoglyceride contribution to the shortening, margarine, or specialty product. Performance evaluations have given some indications that the diglyceride content in the 43% and 52% α-monoglyceride
Fats and Oils Formulation
315
Table 4.12 Mono- and Diglyceride Functionality Emulsifier Form
Functionality
Food Product
Moisture retention
All baked products
Crumb softener
All baked products
Anti-staling
All baked products
Hard
Volume improver
All baked products
5 IV max
Tenderness improver
All baked products
Grain & texture improver
Cakes
Batter aeration
Cakes
Palatability improver
Bread and rolls
Stickiness retardant
Chewing gum and candy
Anti-sticking
Pasta
Oil stabilization
Peanut butter
Rehydration
Dehydrated potatoes
Tight emulsion
Margarine
Freeze/thaw stability
Frozen desserts
Dispersant
Coffee whiteners
Plastic-like
Emulsifier
Spreads & low fat margarine
70 ± 10 IV
Compromise for hard and soft forms
Most products
Aeration
Icings and fillings
Soft
Water absorption
Icings and fillings
90 IV min
Texture improvement
Gravies and sauces
Loose emulsion
Margarine
Fat dispersant
Pet foods
Fat dispersant
Cake donuts
Notes: IV = Iodine Value; max = maximum; min = minimum.
products may contribute some functionality, but no significant improvements have been determined. The optimum usage range of an emulsifier must be determined for each finished product formulation. Excessively high or low levels of the emulsifier will usually lead to unsatisfactory results. Several mono- and diglyceride deviations are produced by using them as raw materials in the production of esters of edible, water-soluble compounds, such as lactic acid, citric acid, acetic acid, diacetyl tartic acid anhydride, and succinic anhydride:104,106-109 • Diacetyl tartaric acid esters of monoglyceride (DATEM) are hydrophilic emulsifying agents with excellent dough-conditioning properties. By strengthening the gluten in the dough, DATEM enhances gas retention, resulting in increased volume in baked products, better dough tolerance to mechanical handling, and improved proofing stability. Gluten strengthening also improves crumb structure and crust characteristics. Even though DATEM is primarily utilized as a dough strengthener, it also has application in extruded products, icings, and margarines.
316
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
• Lactic acid esters of monoglycerides, or lactated esters, are a group of food emulsifiers used primarily in applications where aeration is required, such as in toppings, cakes, and icings. The lactated esters have more surface activity and are slightly more hydrophilic than regular mono- and diglycerides. Most lactated esters are processed from saturated or low-iodine-value mono- and diglycerides to give optimum aerating properties. • Citric acid esters of monoglycerides or monoglyceride citrate are hydrophilic emulsifiers prepared for use as a margarine antispattering agent, for metal chelating, and for use with other surfactants as an emulsion stabilizing agent. • Acetylated monoglycerides are α-tending emulsifiers that can be used to promote aeration, volume, foam texture, and stability against syneresis for imitation creams and toppings. Also, acetylated monoglycerides form protective films that are effective against oxidation and moisture loss to keep pie crusts and pizza shells crisp and fresh. Additionally, the liquid acetylated monoglycerides are effective lubricants and release agents for use as trough grease or bakery product depanning agents. • Succinylated monoglycerides perform as dough conditioners and strengtheners that are tolerant to mechanical handling and flour variability for uniform good volume, texture, flavor, and crumb softness.
4.8.2 Propylene Glycol Esters Propylene glycol mono fatty acid esters are a group of moderately surface active compounds that are effective emulsifiers for cakes and nondairy whipped products, such as imitation creams, whipped toppings, and spray dried topping products. The α-tending, propylene glycol monoester (PGME) surfactants are added not for emulsion stability, but rather to influence the whipping rate, stiffness, volume, and foam stability. These emulsifiers are able to promote an agglomeration of fat globules for the formation of a good and stable foam while forming a protective α-crystalline membrane on the liquid droplets that results in a high degree of aeration. Cake batters aerate rapidly with PGME and produce baked cakes with high volume but fleecy, elongated, even cell structures. Initially, cakes utilizing propylene glycol monostearate (PGMS) had to be low-fat formulations with high PGMS levels, but then it was determined that a combination of PGMS and mono- and diglycerides was more functional for cake baking. The most effective PGME emulsifiers for cakes are produced with a low-iodine-value fat base. For consumer cake mixes, PGME shortenings provide the needed tolerance to mixing conditions at PGME levels of 8.0 to 16.0%, with total monoglyceride levels of 2.0 to 6.0%. Bakery cakes require less functionality from the emulsifier system because the aeration is achieved by more efficient mixing procedures and equipment. These shortenings typically range from 2.8 to 8.5% PGME with 4.0 to 5.5% total monoglyceride. Whippable emulsions normally contain proteins that provide a great deal of the stability needed by these products in a liquid form. In these emulsions, propylene glycol monoesters function to provide volume, foam texture, and stability against syneresis. Structure building consists of agglomerated fat globules forming a network within the foam. The hard form of the 90% monoesters is typically used at 0.2 to 1.5% levels for these products.
Fats and Oils Formulation
317
Saturated fat-based emulsifiers function more as defoamers than aerators in low-moisture prepared foods, such as icings and fillings; however, the softer based PGME emulsifiers can function in these products. An intermediate-hardness PGME surfactant made with a 50-IV hydrogenated lard or a 70-IV hydrogenated soybean oil base added to an all-purpose shortening base to obtain 2.5 to 3.5% PGME and 4.0 to 5.0% total monoglyceride emulsifier will perform in icings, fillings, and low-sugar as well as high-sugar bakery cakes. The intermediate hardness PGME emulsifier has also been utilized for lean cakes, cookies, and other fat-reduced foods. 4.8.3 Sorbitan Esters Sorbitan fatty acid esters are sorbitol-derived analogs of mono- and diglycerides that are slightly more water soluble. Sorbitan monostearate, the most common of these surfactants, is a hard solid or beaded material that requires dispersion in water or fat before use. Sorbitan fatty acid esters are lipophilic emulsifiers that can be used in emulsions where less water-binding properties and enhanced aeration properties are desired. Sorbitan monostearate can be used for icing, whipped topping, and coffee whitener applications for aeration, gloss, and stability characteristics; however, the best known application is probably as a crystal modifier or promoter for confectionery coatings. Sorbitan esters are especially effective additives for the improvement and retention of gloss, plus they have a desirable effect on the fat solids content to improve mouth feel. 4.8.4 Polysorbate Fatty Acid Esters Polyoxyethylene sorbitan esters, commonly called polysorbates, are formed from the reaction of sorbitan esters with ethylene oxide. Three of the polysorbate types permitted for food use in limited amounts are polysorbate 60, polysorbate 65, and polysorbate 80. The level of usage of these emulsifiers is restricted by food-additive regulations; however, relatively small quantities of the polysorbates provide the desired effect in most applications, and higher levels impart a bittersweet taste. The polysorbates are hydrophilic emulsifiers that act as powerful surface-active agents to drastically reduce the interfacial tension among water, oil, and other ingredients; to enhance interaction between ingredients; and to promote emulsion stability. Polysorbate 60 is particularly effective in formulating oil-in-water emulsions. These derivatives have found more acceptance than the sorbitan esters. Polysorbate 60 can be used in applications similar to those cited for sorbitan esters or cakes, whipped toppings, coffee whiteners, icings, and confectioner’s coatings, plus nonstandardized salad dressings. Polysorbate 65 is permitted in ice cream and frozen desserts, mellorine or ice milk, and fruit sherbet as well as in bakery applications. Polysorbate 80 can be used in a wide range of applications, including use in special dietary foods and gelatin desserts, as a solubilizing and dispersing agent in pickles and pickled products, and in baking applications.
318
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
4.8.5 Polyglycerol Esters These compounds are formed by a reaction of fatty acids with polymerized glycerol consisting of 2 to 10 molecules. Careful control of the polymerization and esterification processes produces emulsifiers that can be used to emulsify, thicken, stabilize, defoam, release, plasticize, modify crystallization, enhance gloss, and also prevent sticking, weeping, lumping, and clouding. Some of the typical applications include: • Peanut butter: Stabilizer and plasticization aid to prevent oil separation and weeping while improving spreadability and lubrication to prevent the peanut butter from sticking to the roof of the mouth. • Confectionery coatings: Incorporation of 0.5 to 5.0% of a specific polyglycerol ester to enhance and maintain gloss properties while minimizing tempering and handling problems. • Margarine: Excellent as antispattering and emulsifying agents when used at 0.1 to 0.5% for margarines and at 0.1 to 2.0% for low-fat spreads. • Crystal inhibitor: Retards crystal formation in salad oils to increase the length of time before cloud development at use levels of 0.02 to 0.04%. • Icings and fillings: Rapid effective aeration and weep stabilization for low-moisture icing and filling products at levels of 1.0 to 2.0% of the shortening. • Cakes: Layer and loaf cakes with volume, grain, and texture equivalent to monoand diglyceride-emulsified, high-ratio shortenings can be produced with lower polyglycerol ester use levels of 1.0 to 3.0% of the shortening.
4.8.6 Lactated Esters Several forms of lactated esters are used in foods. Lactic acid esters of monoglyceride, reviewed previously with mono-and diglyceride, are reaction products of glycerine, lactic acid, and fatty acids. The two most prominent products are glycerol- lacto palmitate (GLP) and glycerol-lacto stearate. These α-tending emulsifiers are used primarily in applications where aeration is required, such as cakes, cake mixes, and whipped toppings to improve volume and texture. Most of these products have almost fully saturated fat bases and exhibit some oil solubility, but no water solubility. Stearoyl-2-lactylates are reaction products of stearic fatty acid and lactic acid converted to the calcium or sodium salts. Sodium stearoyl-2-lactylates, one of the most hydrophilic emulsifiers in the food industry, is used principally as a dough conditioner in baked products, pancakes, and waffles, but is also effective in frozen whipped dairy cream and toppings to improve aeration and stabilization of the foam and to improve fat distribution to enhance the whitening effect in coffee whiteners. Calcium stearoyl-2-lactylate, also a dough conditioner, is used in both fresh and prepared mixes for yeast-raised baked products, as a whipping agent for egg whites, and as a conditioning agent for dehydrated potatoes. Low levels, typically 0.25 to 0.5% of the flour, of the stearoyl lactylates complex with starch delays the staling process in bread. The interaction with the flour gluten results in a finer crumb structure, increased volume, and better crust in the baked bread loaf.
Fats and Oils Formulation
319
4.8.7 Lecithin The processed-food industry in the United States utilizes over 350 million pounds of surfactants a year, with 90% being chemically derived and 10% natural. The most prominent, functional, and commonly used natural surfactant is lecithin. This natural emulsifier is found in eggs, dairy products, vegetable oils, and many of the other food products from nature. Lecithin is a phosphorus-containing lipid phosphatide found in all plant and animal organisms. Commercially, the chief source for lecithin is the gums extracted from soybean oil. Lecithin may also be obtained from other oilseeds, such as corn, cotton, peanut, and sunflower, but little is available for commercial use. Lecithin has wide use in food and nonfood products, which makes it a very important byproduct of the soybean oil processing industry. The National Soybean Processor Association established criteria in the early 1970s for defining plastic and fluid lecithins, but these lecithin products are only about 15 to 20% of the current products used. Many new types of lecithins have been introduced commercially over the past few years. Some of these new products include oil-free or de-oiled, fractionated, and enzyme-modified lecithins, among others. Phospholipids isolated from soybean lecithin have the following applications in food products:110,111 • Protein complexing: The ability to complex with the protein in flour (gluten) provides the basis for a good dough conditioner. Lecithin can function as a natural bread-dough conditioner at addition levels generally between 0.25 and 0.6% based on the weight of the flour. • Starch complexing: An ability to complex with starch is the basis of some antistaling agents. Certain lecithin phospholipids, such as phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine, form vesicles or liposomes with excellent antistaling properties. • Fat reducer: Hydrated lecithin can assume a spherical form that rolls on the tongue to give a mouth feel similar to that of fats. Reductions of 20 to 60% of the fat content have been accomplished with cocoa and chocolate products. In chocolate, about 0.25 to 0.35% lecithin is used to reduce viscosity by coating the sugar, to increase the “snap” by allowing a reduction in cocoa butter content, and to inhibit bloom by allowing a wider range of processing temperatures. • Egg yolk replacer: Commercial lecithin can duplicate the emulsification characteristics of egg yolk in cakes, sweet goods, and other food products. Lecithin or egg yolks provide cake batter fluidity during baking that prevents a collapse of the cake, or a “dip.” • Antisticking properties: Lecithin is the antisticking agent used in most pan and grill shortening, pan sprays, and baking-pan release products and is used in the candy industry for hard candies and confectionery. Lecithin mixtures in oil or other solvents form a barrier by coating the equipment surfaces. • Antispattering agent: Lecithin is used in margarines and spreads at 0.1 to 0.5% to act as an antispattering agent. It also serves as an emulsifier to improve texture, absorb moisture, prevent bleeding, and improve spreadability and acts as a browning agent. Spattering is caused by the rapid explosive evaporation of the moisture present in margarine and develops when the finely divided water coalesces to form large drops. Lecithin envelops each water particle with a protective membrane to stop the coalescence of the water droplets.
320
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
• Wetting: Cocoa powders possess poor wetting properties, regardless of the fat content, without the addition of lecithin. Cocoa and other instant drink powders are instantly wetted and drawn into cold water additions with lecithin levels of 1.0 to 1.5%. • Antioxidant: Lecithin functions as antioxidants in some oils at levels of 0.01 to 0.25%. Low-level additions of lecithin can also effectively retard off-flavors caused by hydrolysis by the same action that prevents spattering.
The appearance and flavor requirements of fats and oils can limit the use of lecithin, especially for products that must be heated. Lecithin is quite heat sensitive and can darken, smoke, and develop an offensive fishy odor and flavor at temperatures above 120°F (49°C). Additionally, the level of lecithin added to a fat or oil product may affect both the color of the ingredient and the finished product. Regular fluid food-grade lecithin has a brown or amber color and a typical flavor. At the normal low usage levels, the color, flavor, and odor imparted by lecithin do not materially affect the appearance and flavor of the product; however, care must be exercised with the formulation and use of lecithin products to avoid problems. 4.8.8 Emulsifier Selection Methods The process of selecting an emulsifier system has been viewed as more of an art than a science in that it requires experience and performance testing. The synergistic effects observed with various combinations of surfactants provide desirable functional properties not possible with single emulsifiers and complicate the selection process. Therefore, development of emulsified shortenings can require a complex evaluation program with numerous surfactant blends of different ratios and use levels. Researchers have concluded that emulsifier selection is not a simple task, and a number of schemes have been developed to assist in identification of optimum systems for individual applications. The most well-known selection scheme is probably the hydrophilic/lipophilic balance (HLB). 4.8.8.1 Hydrophilic/Lipophilic Balance System Emulsifiers can be classified by their affinity to water and oil. Surfactants with an affinity to oil (the lipid phase) are classified as fat-loving or lipophilic emulsifiers. Surfactants that have an affinity to water (the aqueous phase) are classified as water-loving or hydrophilic emulsifiers. Oil-soluble or lipophilic emulsifiers will absorb water or water-soluble materials into the oil or lipid phase. Hydrophilic emulsifiers will absorb the oil phase into the water or aqueous phase. The measure of an emulsifier’s affinity for oil or water may be identified by its HLB.112,113 HLB is an expression of the relative attraction of an emulsifier for water and for oil or for the two phases of the emulsifier system being considered. In the HLB system, each emulsifier is assigned a numerical value. An emulsifier that is lipophilic is assigned a low HLB value below 9.0, and one that is hydrophilic is assigned a high HLB value above 11.0. Those in the 9.0 to 11.0 range are intermediate. In general, lipophilic emulsifiers, such as mono- and diglycerides have HLBs in the 2 to 4 range and tend
Fats and Oils Formulation
321
to form water-in-oil emulsions. Hydrophilic emulsifiers, such as polysorbate esters, have HLBs in the 13 to 17 range and tend to form oil-in-water emulsions. The following table illustrated the relationship of HLB to water solubility at 70°F (21.1°C): Emulsifier Behavior When Added to Water
HLB Range
Insoluble
1–4
Poor solubility
3–6
Opaque with vigorous agitation
6–8
Stable opaque dispersion
8–10
Translucent Clear solution
10–13 13 and above
The best results are usually obtained with emulsifier systems or by blending two or more emulsifiers to obtain a desired HLB value rather than using only one. A blended emulsifier system, usually described as a synergistic emulsifier blend, provides not only the functional properties of each emulsifier, but also additional functional properties due to interaction effects. The HLB of the blend is essentially a straight-line relationship that can be determined by multiplying the HLB value of each component in the blend, then adding together these numerical values. The HLB values of various surfactants are listed in the following table: Emulsifier
HLB Value
Mono- and diglycerides 40% minimum α-monoglycerides
2.8
52% minimum α-monoglycerides
3.5
90% minimum α-monoglycerides
4.3
Propylene glycol esters Propylene glycol mono- and diesters
3.4
Propylene glycol mono- and diesters and mono- and diglycerides
3.5
Sorbitan esters Sorbitan monostearate
4.7
Sorbitan tristearate
2.1
Polyoxyethylene sorbitan esters Polysorbate 60
14.9
Polysorbate 65
10.5
Polysorbate 80
15.0
Polyglycerol esters Triglycerol mono shortening
6.0
Triglycerol monostearate
6.2
Hexaglycerol distearate
8.5
322
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Emulsifier
HLB Value
Lactated esters Lactylated mono- and diglycerides
2.6
Lecithin Standard fluid
3.5
De-oiled, 22% phosphatidylcholine
4.5
De-oiled, 45% phosphatidylcholine
6.5
The HLB selection system consists of three steps: (1) determining the optimum HLB value for the intended product, (2) identifying the best emulsifier types, and (3) applying final HLB adjustments. In this procedure, emulsifiers and blends with HLB values outside the identified HLB range may be eliminated to reduce the trial-and-error evaluations. The detailed steps to determine the best HLB value are as follows:
1. Select a matched pair of emulsifiers, one lipophilic and one hydrophilic, with known HLB values, for example, mono- and diglycerides with a 2.8 HLB are lipophilic surfactants, and polysorbate 60 with a 14.9 HLB is a hydrophilic surfactant. 2. Prepare a series of test emulsions with the selected emulsifiers blended to give different HLB values ranging from all lipophilic to all hydrophilic surfactants. This range would be from 2.8 to 14.9 for the two surfactants suggested in the first step. An excess of the emulsifier blend should be used, or approximately 10 to 12% of the fat and oil level in the final product. 3. Evaluate the emulsifier’s series using appropriate performance methods based on the product requirements. One or more of the emulsifier blends should provide a better emulsion than the others, but if all levels appear good, repeat the series with a lower use level. Conversely, if all are poor, the use level should be increased and the series repeated. 4. The final test results should indicate within approximately 2 units the HLB range that will perform the best for the application. A more accurate HLB value may be determined by another series bracketed around this range if necessary.
The appropriate surfactant chemical type is as important as the HLB value. After the HLB value has been established, it must be determined if some other emulsifier blend would perform better, would be more efficient, or would be more cost effective to produce that HLB value. The evaluation object is to select several pairs of emulsifiers covering a suitably wide area of chemical types. Performance evaluations of these blends should indicate the ideal emulsifier blend for the specific application. The HLB method is an incomplete system for selecting surface-active agents. Surfactant selection for emulsions using the HLB system functions well in a pure system when a formula is composed of oil, water, and emulsifiers; however, its use is limited in many food systems due to their complexity. The effect of surfactants on starch complexing is an important function for some products, but HLB does not measure this attribute. Emulsifiers with the same HLB value may vary from excellent to poor in their ability to produce an acceptable cake. Emulsifier selection becomes more complex with the addition of flour, starch, sugar, milk, salt, eggs, or
Fats and Oils Formulation
323
Table 4.13 Emulsifier Functionality Degree Emulsifier
Emulsion
Starch
Dough
Crystal
Stability
Complexing
Conditioner
Modifier
Aeration
Mono- and diglycerides: Hard or saturated
2
1
4
3
1
Soft or unsaturated
2
3
4
3
2
Propylene glycol esters: Propylene glycol mono- and diesters
5
2
5
1
1
Propylene glycol mono- and diesters and mono- and diglycerides
3
1
4
1
1
Sorbitan esters: Sorbitan monstearate
3
5
5
1
3
Sorbitan tristearate
3
5
5
1
5
Polyoxyethylene sorbitan esters: Polysorbate 60
3
2
1
3
1
Polysorbate 65
3
3
3
3
2
Polysorbate 80
2
3
3
2
2
Polyglycerol esters: Triglycerol mono shortening
2
3
3
3
1
Triglycerol monstearate
3
3
3
3
1
Hexaglycerol distearate
1
3
3
1
2
Lactated esters: Lactylated mono- and diglycerides
2
4
5
1
1
Stearoyl-2-lactylates
1
2
1
5
2
3
3
3
1
4
Lecithin: Standard fluid grade
Notes: Emulsifier Functionality Evaluation: 1 = Excellent; 2 = Good; 3 = Slight; 4 = Poor; 5 = None.
other similar ingredients, some of which contain natural emulsifiers that react and interact with each other. Thus, the HLB approach can assist in the surfactant selection process, but identification of the optimum emulsifier system for the application still requires experience and detailed experimental work. 4.8.8.2 Emulsifier Functionality Traits Mono- and diglycerides are probably the most multifunctional emulsifiers. Other emulsifiers generally fit a more specific or limited function. The specificity of surfactant functions provides a selection guide for emulsifier systems development. Table 4.13 evaluates the functionality of emulsifier types most often used for food applications in five different areas:114-116 • Emulsion stability: Emulsifiers create mixtures of two liquids that are normally immiscible. An emulsion can be defined as a dispersion of droplets of one immiscible liquid with another. Emulsifiers promote formation of dispersed systems by
324
•
•
•
•
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
lowering the surface tension at the interface of two immiscible substances. The ability of an emulsifier to act at the interface is due to molecular structure. The polar group of an emulsifier has an affinity for water in which it dissolves. The fatty acid part of the emulsifier has an affinity for oil and dissolves in this phase. Starch complexing: Starch consists of two types of carbohydrates: amylose and amylopectin. A gel is formed when these carbohydrates are mixed with water and heated. The starch components recrystalize from the gel, or retrograde, the process that is responsible for the staling process of baked products, stickiness in pasta and potato products, and hardening in starch jelly confections. Emulsifiers that can form complexes with starch retard the retrogradation process. Dough conditioning: Gluten, the protein in wheat flour, forms a network that strengthens dough. Certain emulsifiers can strengthen the gluten, thereby preventing rupture of the cell walls that have entrapped the fermentation gases. This allows the cells to form uniformly, providing even grain in the finished loaf and dough that are not sticky or bucky for better machinability. Crystal modification: Triglycerides are polymorphic, which means that they can exist in more than one crystalline form. Crystal reversion can be retarded by the incorporation of emulsifiers with crystal modification capabilities. The propylene glycol monoesters, acetylated monoglycerides, and lactylated monoglycerides of α-tending surfactants can stabilize mono-and diglycerides in the more active α-form for improved functionality. Sorbitan esters prevent the formation of bloom on chocolate products by retarding β-crystal development. Polyglycerol esters also prevent chocolate bloom and are effective crystal inhibitors for salad oils. Lecithin was the first crystal inhibitor used in salad oil processing. Aeration: Many food products are prepared in emulsion form and are aerated to a foam. Aerating emulsifiers facilitates aeration, provides faster whipping rates, evens cell structures, and provides higher volumes in baked products and other aerated products, such as icings, fillings, and whipped toppings.
4.8.8.3 Emulsifier Selection Procedure The emulsifier system of a product must be tailored to the specific application, as its behavior will be influenced by the processing conditions and the presence of other ingredients. Furthermore, a blend of two or more emulsifiers imparts synergistic effects greater than that possible with a single emulsifier. Development of the optimum system requires analyzing the available surfactants in blends of different ratios. The following guidelines summarize a successful technique for the selection of an emulsifier system for specific applications:106
1. Consult the applicable regulations for restriction on the use of emulsifiers or for specific requirements for standardized products. Only approved emulsifiers should be considered. 2. Identify the functional requirements of the food system, the method of processing, and the form of the finished product. 3. Identify the surfactants that contribute the functional properties required by the food system. Table 4.9 summarizes the functions of the emulsifier types most often used for food applications. Also, consult surfactant suppliers for suggested usage levels, incorporation methods, product functionality, and other available information.
Fats and Oils Formulation
325
4. Screen the approved emulsifiers with functional characteristics applicable to the food product using the HLB system guidelines. Identify the most promising blends and evaluate further to identify the optimum emulsifier system. 5. Optimize the emulsifier system usage level. Emulsifiers have an optimum usage range or plateau that provides the maximum functionality; levels over and under this plateau level provide lesser degrees of the preferred functionality.
4.9 PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Fats and oils are key functional ingredients in a large variety of food products. They have particular physical properties of importance in the processing and final use of both natural and prepared foods. The glyceride structure and composition of the fats present in such foods also differ widely. These fatty acid and triglyceride compositions influence the functional properties of foods and food ingredients that contain even modest fat levels. The relationships between triglyceride composition and end-use characteristics are evident when the physical and chemical properties are evaluated. Therefore, fats and oils with similar physical and chemical properties, even with different triglyceride compositions, can provide the desired functional characteristics for the food product. Fat systems for foods and food ingredients may be developed in several ways. Three product development methods used to formulate fats and oils products to perform desired applications include:
1. Application development: Utilize qualitative knowledge regarding the effects of source oils, basestocks, fat fractions, interesterified products, emulsifiers, and other additives on product consistency and behavior in the finished product. 2. Analytical development: Determine the components based on their contributions to satisfying predetermined analytical limits. 3. Triglyceride replication: Carefully blend selected fractions from various source oils to duplicate the triglyceride structure of another product.
4.9.1 Application Product Development Application development of fats and oils products begins with identification of the key functional attributes the product is expected to provide to the end-use product and the use of historical knowledge to identify and evaluate the physical and chemical properties most likely to produce the intended functionality. Recognition of the primary and secondary functional attributes and disregarding insignificant properties is important for this product development. The results of these studies provide the information necessary to develop a product specification that identifies the physical and chemical requirements that must be met to ensure compliance with the requirements of the application. In most cases, the product is required to meet the performance standards of an existing product; however, the product developed may perform better than the original, or the product currently used may be overqualified for the application.
326
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Performance requirements can usually be translated into analytical measurements for the specification limits of the product in development. For example, the primary performance requirements of a salad oil can be evaluated with the AOCS Cold Test Method Cc 11-53,117 which determines the resistance of an oil to crystallization while submerged in an ice bath. This analytical method was developed to evaluate the acceptability of salad oil products for the production of mayonnaise and salad dressing. An oil that clouds or solidifies at the cold temperatures used for salad dressing preparation will cause the emulsion to break, which results in product separation. Likewise, the SFI and SFC curves are of great importance to achieving the desired consistency and performance of shortening, margarine, and other fats and oils products. The usual SFI measurements used to identify the acceptability of a margarine product differ from those used for shortening acceptability because of the primary uses of the two fats and oils products:
1. Typical margarine SFI measurement points: a. SFI at 50°F (10°C) indicates the printability and spreadability of a margarine product at refrigerator temperatures. b. SFI at 70°F (21.1°C) indicates the product resistance to oil-off at room temperature. c. SFI at 92°F (33.3°C) indicates the mouth feel or melt-in-the-mouth characteristics. 2. Typical shortening SFI measurement points: a. SFI at 50°F (10°C) indicates the consistency at retarder temperatures. b. SFI at 80°F (26.7°C) indicates the consistency at usual batter or dough mixing temperatures. c. SFI at 104°F (40°C) indicates the resistance of the shortening to high-temperature storage.
The above are typical SFI measurement points for standard products and may not be applicable for particular product development applications, so the measurement points should be established for each product individually. However, in each case where SFI control is exercised, a minimum of three measurement points should be established to identify and help prevent what has been identified as “slope unawareness.” 70 The desired SFI slope of a fat or oil product is the difference between the lowest and highest temperature measurements. Depending on the allowed tolerances, the slope can vary considerably, sometimes enough to drastically change the performance of the product. For instance, if the desired slope of a particular product from 50 to 104°F SFI was 18 units with an allowed tolerance of ±3 at the 50°F SFI and ±2 at the 104°F SFI, the actual slope could vary from 13 to 23 units, or ±5 units. Additionally, the slope could vary more than this range if only one or two SFI temperatures were measured without the processor or the formulator being aware that these changes were occurring. On this basis, it is important to identify the SFI measurement temperatures, slope, and allowable tolerances that do not adversely affect the product performance.
Fats and Oils Formulation
327
4.9.2 Analytical Development Formulation of a fat and oil product to satisfy an existing specification requires knowledge of the contribution of each individual component to the required physical and chemical analysis. Many of the analytical requirements of fat blends, such as iodine value and fatty acid composition, are linear, and the blend analysis can take the sum of the weighted averages of the blend components. However, the SFI profile of a fat and oil blend is a nonlinear function of the behavior of the individual constituents, and skill and experience are required to identify the fractional components of the blend to meet the specified limits. 4.9.2.1 Solids Fat Index Calculations The SFI contribution of each component of a blend can be calculated algebraically; however, the different basestock types require different formulae. The three basestock variations are (1) liquid oils have a dilutive SFI effect, (2) hardfats contribute 100% or more to SFI values, and (3) basestocks contribute SFI values that are basically linear. Previous SFI data for each component and the prospective blends must be available for these calculations. Factors are established from these data to calculate the contribution of the individual components to the final blends. These calculations allow the formulator to identify the desired composition with less laboratory work preparing and analyzing various blends: 1. Liquid oil calculations: Liquid oils have a dilution effect on the contributions of solid fats to the SFI. The extent of these negative effects depends on the amount of liquid oil in the blend and the hardness of the solid basestock. Calculations of the liquid dilution factors are shown in Table 4.14 for a blend of 80% refined bleached (RB) soybean oil with 20% 60-IV hydrogenated soybean oil basestock. Liquid dilution factors change with each blend of an oil with a basestock as well as the level of each basestock. Actual SFI results for blends of refined and bleached
Table 4.14 Liquid Dilution Factor Calculation Blend: 80% RBD-SBO and 20% 60-IV H-SBO SFI Dilution Calculations: 60-IV H-SBO SFI
Blend SFI Results
20%
Blend
Basestock
Liquid Dilution
Temperature
SFI
Contribution
SFI
Dilution
Factor
10.0°C/50°F
64.2
× 20% = 12.8
8.0
–4.8
÷ 80% = –6.0
21.1°C/70°F
56.2
× 20% = 11.2
4.6
–6.6
÷ 80% = –8.3
26.7°C/80°F
52.7
× 20% = 10.5
3.3
–7.2
÷ 80% = –9.1
33.3°C/92°F
35.8
× 20% = 7.5
0.5
–6.6
÷ 80% = –8.3
40.0°C/104°F
13.2
× 20% = 2.6
0.0
–2.6
÷ 80% = –3.3
Notes: RBD = refined, bleached, & deodorized; SBO = soybean oil; IV = Iodine Value; H-SBO = hydrogenated soybean oil; SFI = Solids Fat Index.
328
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
(RB) soybean oil, corn oil, and cottonseed oil with hydrogenated soybean oil (HSBO) basestocks, tabulated in Table 4.15, illustrate the dilution effects of these oils. Calculated dilution factors for the same blends, summarized in Table 4.16, show the negative SFI effects. The liquid dilution factors are accurate only for the blend that provided the data. The results of a second blend will vary from the initial blend because of changes in triglyceride composition and reproducibility of the SFI method. 2. Basestock blend calculations: Basestock SFI calculations are linear, and the blend values can be determined by the sum of the weighted averages for all temperatures where all of the components have individual SFI values. An absence of SFI values for any of the components indicates that the solids from the other basestocks will be diluted. The dilutive effect is determined by the same method as that for liquid oils. 3. Hardfat blend calculations: Hardfats normally contribute 100% or more to the SFI values because they are almost completely saturated. Actual SFI values are not available for the low-iodine-value hardfats because their expansion would break the SFI dilatometer during the analysis. Their effect on SFI can be determined by evaluating blends of the hardfat with the desired basestock or liquid oil to identify the hardfat “bump” or increase at each SFI temperature. Hardfat bump varies with the evaluation temperature, use level, and hardfat source oil. Sample calculations to identify hardfat bump is shown in Table 4.17. The table tabulates the SFI results for blends of various basestocks with three different hardfats: 56-titer palm oil, 4-IV H-CSO, and 28-IV H-CSO. Table 4.18 lists the hardfat bump factors calculated for the blends presented in Table 4.17.
4.9.3 Triglyceride Replication Natural fat systems are mixtures of various triglycerides. Their functional properties and quality characteristics are directly related to the type of triglycerides in the fat system. Formulation by the triglyceride replication method requires qualitative and quantitative knowledge of triglyceride composition of the target fat system. Characterization of triglyceride compositions is possible but requires a well-equipped laboratory and time-consuming, tedious analysis. Insight into the molecular composition of fats can be obtained from the fatty acid composition and further refined to differentiate positional and geometric isomers of both fatty acids and triglycerides. After the molecular structures for the target fat system are identified, individual components from specific source oils and product fractions obtained by hydrogenation, fractionation, interesterification, or a combination of these processes are blended to replicate the desired composition. The source oils and processing normally contain or produce unwanted triglyceride structures that must be separated from the mixture. This process creates one or more byproducts, thus leading to additional product development study to identify cost-effective utilization of these surplus fractions. This formulation technique has achieved commercial success, but is primarily limited in scope and application to cocoa butter equivalents. Cocoa butter is composed of predominantly symmetrical triglycerides, approximately 75%, with oleic fatty acid in the sn-2 position. It also contains approximately 20% triglycerides that
Fats and Oils Formulation
329
Table 4.15 SFI Results of Blends of Liquid Oils with Hydrogenated Basestocks RB Soybean Oil, % Basestock, %
None
20
40
60
80
100
80
60
40
20
60 IV H-SBO Basestock SFI at 50°F/10.0°C
64.2
47.2
32.3
20.0
8.0
SFI at 70°F/21.1°C
56.2
36.5
24.2
14.0
4.6 3.3
SFI at 80°F/26.7°C
52.7
34.2
21.5
11.7
SFI at 92°F/33.3°C
35.8
22.0
12.0
5.7
0.5
SFI at 104°F/40.0°C
13.2
7.2
3.0
—
—
SFI at 50°F/10.0°C
61.5
45.0
30.7
19.0
66 IV H-SBO Basestock 8.0
SFI at 70°F/21.1°C
48.5
34.0
21.5
12.5
5.2
SFI at 80°F/26.7°C
41.5
28.5
17.5
9.0
2.0
SFI at 92°F/33.3°C
23.8
14.5
SFI at 104°F/40.0°C
4.3
1.7
39.1
SFI at 70°F/21.1°C SFI at 80°F/26.7°C SFI at 92°F/33.3°C
1.9
8.0
3.2
—
—
—
28.0
18.7
10.5
21.0
14.0
8.5
4.0
12.7
7.9
4.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
6.8
3.0
1.7
—
—
74 IV H-SBO Basestock SFI at 50°F/10.0°C
3.6 —
80 IV H-SBO Basestock SFI at 50°F/10.0°C
25.4
16.8
12.2
SFI at 70°F/21.1°C
10.4
6.4
3.6
SFI at 80°F/26.7°C
4.7
2.3
1.0
RB Corn Oil, %
None
66 IV H-Corn Oil Basestock, %
100
SFI at 50°F/10.0°C
62.6
—
—
20
40
60
80 20
80
60
40
46.3
31.1
19.1
9.3
SFI at 70°F/21.1°C
49.8
35.0
22.2
12.7
5.3
SFI at 80°F/26.7°C
43.3
29.1
17.2
9.0
2.9
SFI at 92°F/33.3°C
24.3
14.8
2.5
—
SFI at 104°F/40.0°C
4.7
—
—
—
7.4 —
RB Cottonseed Oil, %
None
20
40
60
80
66 IV H-SBO Basestock, %
100
80
60
40
20
SFI at 50°F/10.0°C
60.5
46.0
32.3
19.5
SFI at 70°F/21.1°C
49.0
35.0
23.2
13.0
8.5 5.0
SFI at 80°F/26.7°C
44.3
30.3
19.4
10.0
2.8
SFI at 92°F/33.3°C
26.5
16.5
SFI at 104°F/40.0°C
5.8
2.4
9.8
4.5
—
—
—
—
Notes: R = refined; B = bleached; IV = iodine value; H = hydrogenated; SBO = soybean oil; SFI = Solids Fat Index.
330
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 4.16 Liquid Oil Dilution Factors RB Soybean Oil, %
20
40
60
80
Basestock, %
80
60
40
20
60 IV H-SBO Basestock SFI at 50°F/10.0°C
–20.8
–15.6
–9.5
–6.0
SFI at 70°F/21.1°C
–32.3
–23.8
–14.1
–8.3
SFI at 80°F/26.7°C
–39.8
–25.3
–15.6
–9.1
SFI at 92°F/33.3°C
–33.2
–23.7
–14.4
–8.3
SFI at 104°F/40.0°C
–16.8
–12.3
–8.8
–3.3
66 IV H-SBO Basestock SFI at 50°F/10.0°C
–21.0
–15.5
–9.3
–5.4
SFI at 70°F/21.1°C
–24.0
–19.0
–11.5
–5.6
SFI at 80°F/26.7°C
–23.5
–18.5
–12.7
–7.9
SFI at 92°F/33.3°C
–22.5
–15.8
–10.5
–6.0
SFI at 104°F/40.0°C
–8.7
–6.5
–2.9
–1.0
74 IV H-SBO Basestock SFI at 50°F/10.0°C
–16.5
–12.0
–8.5
–5.3
SFI at 70°F/21.1°C
–14.0
–10.3
–7.3
–5.3
SFI at 80°F/26.7°C
–11.3
–9.1
–8.5
–3.2
SFI at 92°F/33.3°C
–7.6
–2.9
–1.3
–0.5
80 IV H-SBO Basestock SFI at 50°F/10.0°C
–17.6
–10.1
–5.8
–2.6
SFI at 70°F/21.1°C
–10.1
–6.6
–4.1
–2.6
SFI at 80°F/26.7°C
–16.4
–4.6
–3.1
–1.2
RB Corn Oil, %
80
40
60
80
66 IV H-Corn Oil Basestock, %
20
60
40
20
SFI at 50°F/10.0°C
–18.9
–16.2
–9.9
–4.0
SFI at 70°F/21.1°C
–24.2
–19.2
–12.0
–5.8
SFI at 80°F/26.7°C
–27.7
–22.0
–13.9
–7.2
SFI at 92°F/33.3°C
–23.2
–18.0
–12.0
–6.1
SFI at 104°F/40.0°C
–18.8
–7.1
–3.1
–1.2
RB Cottonseed Oil, %
20
40
60
80
66 IV H-SBO Basestock, %
80
60
40
20
–12.0
–10.0
–7.8
–4.5 –6.0
SFI at 50°F/10.0°C SFI at 70°F/21.1°C
–21.0
–15.5
–11.0
SFI at 80°F/26.7°C
–25.7
–18.0
–12.9
–7.6
SFI at 92°F/33.3°C
–23.5
–15.3
–10.2
–6.6
SFI at 104°F/40.0°C
–11.2
–8.7
–3.9
–1.5
Notes: RB = refined and bleached; IV = iodine value; H = hydrogenated; SBO = soybean oil; SFI = Solids Fat Index.
Fats and Oils Formulation
331
Table 4.17 SFI Results of Hardfat Blended with Soft Basestocks 56-Titer Palm Oil, % Basestock, %
None
4
8
10
15
100
96
92
90
85
109 IV H-SBO Basestock SFI at 50°F/10.0°C
2.0
6.0
10.0
12.0
17.0
SFI at 70°F/21.1°C
0.8
5.2
9.7
11.5
16.8
SFI at 80°F/26.7°C
—
4.9
9.7
11.5
16.8
SFI at 92°F/33.3°C
—
3.8
8.0
10.2
15.5
SFI at 104°F/10.0°C
—
1.0
5.5
7.3
12.5 48.0
74 IV H-SBO Basestock SFI at 50°F/10.0°C
41.0
42.0
44.5
45.0
SFI at 70°F/21.1°C
23.5
26.8
31.0
32.5
36.7
SFI at 80°F/26.7°C
16.0
22.5
28.0
30.0
34.5
SFI at 92°F/33.3°C
4.0
11.5
18.0
21.5
26.0
SFI at 104°F/10.0°C
—
3.0
9.5
12.0
17.5
SFI at 50°F/10.0°C
64.0
66.0
67.0
67.3
68.0
SFI at 70°F/21.1°C
55.0
57.0
59.2
60.5
61.5 59.5
66 IV H-SBO Basestock
SFI at 80°F/26.7°C
50.5
53.5
56.5
58.0
SFI at 92°F/33.3°C
32.0
37.5
42.5
44.8
47.5
SFI at 104°F/10.0°C
15.0
17.5
23.5
26.0
31.0
4 IV H-CSO Hardfat, %
None
91.5 IV H-SBO Basestock, %
100
5
10
15
20
95
90
85
80
SFI at 50°F/10.0°C
18.1
21.9
25.1
29.2
33.5
SFI at 70°F/21.1°C
7.6
12.9
18.6
21.1
26.4
SFI at 80°F/26.7°C
3.2
11.9
18.0
22.0
26.0
SFI at 92°F/33.3°C
0.1
8.5
14.7
19.5
24.0
SFI at 100°F/37.8°C
—
6.1
12.2
17.7
22.6
SFI at 104°F/10.0°C
—
5.1
10.9
16.8
22.2
28 IV H-SBO Hardfat, %
None
91.5 IV H-SBO Basestock, %
100
5
10
15
20
95
90
85
80
SFI at 50°F/10.0°C
18.1
23.7
26.8
29.9
31.8
SFI at 70°F/21.1°C
7.6
12.6
17.0
21.1
25.1
SFI at 80°F/26.7°C
3.2
9.6
14.8
19.6
23.7
SFI at 92°F/33.3°C
0.1
4.6
8.9
13.3
17.5
SFI at 100°F/37.8°C
—
1.8
5.2
8.7
12.4
SFI at 104°F/10.0°C
—
1.0
3.5
6.9
10.4
Notes: IV = iodine value; H = hydrogenate; SBO = soybean oil; CSO = cottonseed oil; SFI = Solids Fat Index.
332
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 4.18 Hardfat Bump Factors 56-T Titer Palm Oil, %
4
6
10
15
Basestock, %
96
94
90
85
50°F SFI Bump Factor
1.02
1.02
1.02
1.02
70°F SFI Bump Factor
1.11
1.16
1.08
1.07
80°F SFI Bump Factor
1.23
1.20
1.15
1.12
109 IV H-SBO Basestock
92°F SFI Bump Factor
0.95
0.95
1.02
1.03
104°F SFI Bump Factor
0.25
0.50
0.73
0.83
74 IV H-SBO Basestock 50°F SFI Bump Factor
0.66
0.74
0.81
0.88
70°F SFI Bump Factor
1.19
1.15
1.14
1.12
80°F SFI Bump Factor
1.79
1.66
1.56
1.39
92°F SFI Bump Factor
1.92
1.87
1.79
1.51
104°F SFI Bump Factor
0.75
0.92
1.20
1.17
50°F SFI Bump Factor
1.14
1.06
0.97
0.96
70°F SFI Bump Factor
1.05
1.13
1.10
0.96
66 IV H-SBO Basestock
80°F SFI Bump Factor
1.26
1.26
1.26
1.11
92°F SFI Bump Factor
1.70
1.70
1.60
1.35
104°F SFI Bump Factor
0.78
1.12
1.25
1.22
4 IV CSO Hardfat, %
5
10
15
20
91.5 IV H-SBO Basestock, %
95
90
85
80
50°F SFI Bump Factor
0.94
0.88
0.92
0.95
70°F SFI Bump Factor
1.14
1.18
1.08
1.02
80°F SFI Bump Factor
1.77
1.51
1.28
1.17
92°F SFI Bump Factor
1.68
1.46
1.29
1.20
100°F SFI Bump Factor
1.22
1.22
1.18
1.13
104°F SFI Bump Factor
1.02
1.09
1.12
1.11
28 IV H-CSO Hardfat, %
5
10
15
20
91.5 IV H-CSO Hardfat, %
95
90
85
80
50°F SFI Bump Factor
1.30
1.05
0.97
0.87
70°F SFI Bump Factor
1.08
1.02
0.98
0.95
80°F SFI Bump Factor
1.31
1.19
1.13
1.06
92°F SFI Bump Factor
0.90
0.88
0.88
0.87
100°F SFI Bump Factor
0.36
0.52
0.58
0.62
104°F SFI Bump Factor
0.20
0.35
0.46
0.52
Notes: R = refined; B = bleached; H = hydrogenated; SBO = soybean oil; IV = iodine value; SFI = Solids Fat Index.
Fats and Oils Formulation
333
are liquid at room temperature, has a melting range of 32 to 35°C, and softens around 30 to 32°C. The unique triglyceride composition, together with the extremely low levels of diglycerides, contributes to the desirable physical properties of cocoa butter and its ability to recrystallize in a stable crystal form. Cocoa butter is a simple, three-component system consisting of palmitic–oleic– palmitic (POP), palmitic–oleic–stearic (POS), and stearic–oleic–stearic (SOS) triglycerides. If components with these three triglycerides are blended in the correct proportions, the resultant triglyceride replication product will behave like cocoa butter.118 Commercial products composed of a palm oil, middle-melting fraction rich in POP and fats, such as shea or sal, are fractionated to obtain triglyceride fractions rich in POS and SOS. Careful preparation and blending of these components results in a vegetable fat equivalent to cocoa butter in performance.119 4.10 SOURCE OILS AND FATS INTERCHANGEABILITY Substitution of one source oil for another may be desirable due to raw-material availability, cost reduction, religious prohibitions, consumer preference, legislation, etc. The degree of interchangeability possible is determined by (1) characteristics of the initial product, (2) source oil or oils to be substituted, (3) requirements of the application, and (4) product knowledge and information available to the formulator. The raw materials of interchangeability are naturally the source oils and fats that are available to the formulator. They may vary in chemical composition and physical properties and may require different processing techniques to become adequate substitutes. The effect of emulsifiers, antioxidants, crystal inhibitors, antifoamers, and other additives must also be considered for successful substitute or alternative formulations. Source-oil interchangeability assumes that a product with a degree of acceptable performance exists. All alternative formulation developments start by identifying the requirements of the product. For example, margarine was developed as a substitute for butter to provide an affordable food source with a more reliable supply. The performance requirements for this substitute product were the flavor characteristics, consistency, and eating characteristics, or mouth feel, of butter. In this case, technology was used to develop a substitute, but not an exact duplicate, for the existing product. The tools available for source-oil interchangeability formulation are (1) analytical methods to identify the characteristics of the existing product, (2) processes that alter the physical and chemical nature of the source oils, (3) performance evaluations to determine if the substitute product has the desired application characteristics, and (4) databases that allow screening of the potential product components.120 The degree of interchangeability possible is determined by the characteristics of the initial product, the substituting source oils, and the requirements of the application. In the simplest cases, source oil substitution involves (1) direct substitution of one oil for another, (2) blending source oils, or (3) inclusion of a hydrogenated basestock or hardfat to satisfy an SFI or SFC profile. Alternate formulation development becomes more complex when the source oils have dissimilar characteristics, such as the substitution of a semisolid, such as palm
334
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
oil for a liquid oil, such as soybean oil. Likewise, it is necessary to consider the crystal habit of the oil or fat being introduced and its effect on the crystalline form of the product. A β polymorph is more stable than β′, but the rate of transition from one crystal form to another differs for each oil type. The β′ form is preferred for most shortenings and margarines because it promotes plasticity, smooth texture, and improved creaming properties. The β-crystal form tends to produce large granular crystals and products that are waxy and grainy with poor aeration potential. The β formers perform well in applications, such as pie crusts, where a grainy texture is desirable; in frying shortenings, where the crystal is destroyed by heating; and in liquid shortenings, where the large granular crystals are preferred for stability and fluidity maintenance. The ratio of β- to β′-crystal formers helps determine the dominant crystal habit, but the higher melting triglyceride portions of a solidified fat product usually force the fat to assume that crystal form. In practice, the use of β′ hardfats at levels as low as 5% can stabilize a product in the β′ polymeric form. Other β′ stabilization methods are interesterification, trans acids, low temperature storage, and the use of additives, such as sorbitan tristearate and diglycerides. 4.11 REDUCED TRANS FATTY ACID FORMULATION Stable and functional fats and oils products are an essential part of most processed foods. Hydrogenated fats and oils have been the ingredient of choice because they provided the desired functionality and an excellent shelf life for most products. However, recent nutritional research has connected the trans fatty acids produced by hydrogenation with certain health risks. Research has indicated that diets high in trans fatty acids have unfavorable effects on both LDL and HDL cholesterol. As a result of these findings professional health organizations have recommended that consumption of trans fatty acids be reduced and the U.S. labeling regulations were revised to require a listing of the amount of trans fatty acids on the Nutrition Fact Panel for food products.121 Partially hydrogenated fats and oils are recognized as major sources of the trans fatty acids found in processed foods in the U.S. and Canada. Approximately 95% of the dietary trans fatty acids are supplied by partially hydrogenated fats and oils, the remaining 5% are supplied by ruminant animal fats.122 Therefore, elimination or reduction of trans necessitates the identification of processes to replace hydrogenation and the development of suitable replacement products. Fats and oils processors began offering products with reduced saturates and trans fatty acid levels some time ago; some examples include: (1) foodservice liquid frying shortenings to replace heavy-duty plastic frying shortenings, (2) fluidized baking shortenings where emulsifiers assume the functionality role to replace plasticized shortenings, (3) margarine oil formulations with a high liquid oil content to replace all-hydrogenated oil formulations, and (4) table spreads with lower fat levels to replace margarine. Beyond these improvements, a variety of options exist to reduce levels of trans fatty acids, but generally the penalty is higher saturates. Fats and oils can be formulated as trans acid-free products, but saturates are required for the solids contents that provide the functionality for plastic and liquid products. Reduced saturates
Fats and Oils Formulation
335
may be an option in some cases, but a saturate-free product is probably impossible if functionality is to be maintained. Some options available to formulate reduced and trans-free products with acceptable SFI and melting profiles include:
1. Blending a. The original compound shortening blend of a liquid oil with stearin is still a viable formulation technique. The stearin portion may be a fully hydrogenated hardfat or a stearin produced by fractionation, interesterification, or a combination of the two. These all-purpose shortenings have good plasticity and perform well in bakery products, but their oxidative stability will be limited due to the high level of unsaturated fatty acids. High-oleic hybrid oils can be an option for the liquid oil portion to improve oxidative stability. These products should have zero trans fatty acids with careful deodorization. b. Blends of palm oil with liquid oils and hardfats should fulfill the functionality requirements of a number of bakery products requiring specific SFI profiles without sacrificing oxidative stability. However, the use of natural palm oil may be limited due to the slow crystallization tendencies and post hardening contributed by the diglyceride content and the high percentage of the symmetrical SUS triglyceride group. In fats and oils products where performance is dependent on consistency it may be necessary to limit the use of palm oil to less than 25%. c. Blends of lauric oils with liquid oils or hardfats provide steep SFI slopes with sharp melting points for the eating characteristics required for most nondairy products, confections, and other products. The steep solids fat profile of the lauric oils and the eutectic formation with other vegetable oils help to counterbalance a high melting and/or flat solids fat profile product.74 d. Animal fats were replaced with hydrogenated vegetable oils in the 1980s to reduce cholesterol and saturated fatty acids. Utilization of cholesterol-stripped animal fats may allow a revival of the lard and tallow formulations. This process does not affect the saturated or natural trans fatty acid contents, but their combined totals may be lower than with the use of hydrogenated vegetable oils.123 2. Random interesterification: In many European countries, interesterification rather than hydrogenation has been the process of choice to modify fats. Fats and oils products can be produced using basestocks made from interesterified blends of saturated fats and soft oils or natural fats with high saturated contents. These basestocks are then blended with soft oils to produce fat systems for a wide range of products. The ability to modify the melting and functional crystallization characteristics without changing the fatty acid composition makes interesterification a process with a number of unique possibilities. Summarized, the benefits of the interesterification process are124 Interesterification Affects
Interesterification Does Not Affect
Melting point
Iodine value
Solid fat index
Fatty acid composition
Solid fat content
Trans development
Crystal habit
Nutritional aspects
336
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 4.19 Interesterification Effect on Blends of Liquid and Saturated Cottonseed Oil Cottonseed Oil, %
70
80
85
60-T Cottonseed Oil, %
30
20
15
Blend
INT
Blend
INT
Blend
INT
53.5
43.0
52.0
39.4
50.2
36.0 12.8
Melting point, °C Solids Fat Index: 50°F/10.0°C
31.2
24.3
21.8
18.3
17.0
70°F/21.1°C
31.3
16.4
22.3
11.9
17.3
7.3
80°F/26.7°C
31.0
14.5
22.0
9.6
16.7
5.7
31.4
12.5
22.4
7.2
17.0
3.9
21.0
4.5
17.0
—
14.5
—
92°F/33.3°C 104°F/40.0°C
e
Notes: INT = Interesterified; = estimated; T = Titer. e
Random interesterification reorders the triglycerides from their naturally occurring nonrandom distribution to one that is random and consequently improves melting and crystallization properties. This process generally promotes the β′-crystal structure by increasing the number of different fatty acid combinations attached to the glycerol backbone. It has been demonstrated that an interesterified blend of liquid soybean oil and low-iodine-value soybean oil hardfat crystallizes in the β′-crystal form. The ratios of saturates to unsaturates can be modified for specific requirements, and if the unsaturated fatty acids are the cis form, the blends should be trans free. The interesterification process can be utilized to produce basestocks, similar to a hydrogenated basestock system, to formulate trans-free shortenings, margarines, and other specialty fats and oils products. The effects of randomizing blends of liquid oil with saturated hardstocks on SFI and melting point are shown in Table 4.19. The 70/30 blend was formulated as an all-purpose shortening and the other blends as margarine oils.125 3. Directed interesterification is based on the principal of withdrawing specific triglycerides as they are formed. For example, removal of the S3 triglyceride from the reaction by crystallization increases the melting point and flattens the solids fat profile of the fat or oil as the reaction continues toward complete random rearrangement. With directed interesterification, it is possible to produce a plastic fat from a liquid oil without resorting to hydrogenation or blending with a hardfat. This is especially true with oils containing a substantial quantity of saturated fatty acids like cottonseed or peanut oils.126 Another potential application would couple directed interesterification with fractionation to produce stocks rich in saturated and unsaturated fatty acids. The saturated stock could be used as a hardfat and the unsaturated portion could qualify as a high stability oil depending on the original source oil or oil blend. 4. Fractionation: The fractionation process separates fats and oils to create fractions with different melting behaviors. Development of the starting oil mixtures and the fractionation conditions can be the basis for a fractionated oil product basestock system. One example of a fractionated basestock was the use of the stearin fraction, from cottonseed winterization, as a basestock to produce stick margarines. A hydrogenated oil basestock was developed to produce this basestock when the
Fats and Oils Formulation
337
supply of cottonseed stearin was in short supply. One consideration with fractionated products is that the natural tocopherols normally stay with the soft or liquid fractions, so that the stearin fractions have a poorer oxidative stability than their hydrogenated basestock counterparts. 5. Genetically modified oils (GMO): many of the GMO varieties may be substituted for partially hydrogenated oil products or basestocks. The high-oleic varieties offer what appears to be the best alternative for plastic heavy-duty restaurant frying shortenings and the substitute for the brush-hydrogenated basestock used as the base oil in many liquid shortenings specifically formulated for frying, cakes, yeastraised products, and other food products.
4.12 ESSENTIAL FATTY ACID FORTIFICATION Human life is dependent on the essential fatty acids, which must be obtained from food because the human body lacks the enzymes required for their production.14 Linoleic (C-18:2) and linolenic (C-18:3) are essential fatty acids. Mammals possess the enzymes necessary to convert these essential fatty acids to longer chain more unsaturated fatty acids;4 however it is a slow process because the human conversion efficiency of linolenic to EPA and DHA fatty acids is ~4%.127 Nevertheless, these two essential fatty acids form the starting point for the creation of two physiological families: omega-3 and omega-6. There are only minor differences in the molecular structure of the omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids, but they act differently in the human body. The omega-6 fatty acids promote inflammation, blood clotting, and tumor growth, while the omega-3 fatty acids have antiinflammatory characteristics. The omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids work together when in balance to promote health. However, a predominance of either produces pro- or antiinflammatory conditions. A 10% level of unsaturated fatty acids with a 2:l ratio of linoleic to linolenic fatty acids has been recommended to maximize the conversion of α-linolenic to DHA fatty acid.128 Changes in eating habits and dietary fats and oils have caused essential fatty acid consumption to be heavily skewed toward omega-6 fatty acids. This imbalance in the consumption of the essential fatty acids indicates a need for fortification with omega-3 fatty acids and more specifically EPA (C-20:5) and DHA (C-22:6). EPA and DHA fatty acids intakes are recommended at levels of 0.65 grams/day (g/d) for 2000-calorie diet with a minimum of 0.22 g/d for either fatty acid.19 4.12.1 Essential Fatty Acid Sources The traditional sources for the omega-3 fatty acids include oils from fish and vegetable oils, such as linseed, canola and soybean. Biotechnology presents alternative sources, such as genetic engineering of oilseeds, biotransformation of fats and oils into more value added products, and single cell oils. Single cell oil is a name coined for edible oil extracted from a microbial cell. Various species of yeasts, fungi, and algae are able to produce high levels of nutritionally important essential fatty acids.129
338
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
• Commercial edible fats and oils: Vegetable oils and animal fats prominent in the American diet are rich in omega-6 fatty acids. Vegetable oils, such as corn, cottonseed, soybean, sunflower, safflower, peanut, and canola oils, have high linoleic (C-18:2) fatty acid contents. Animal fats, lard, tallow, and butter fat contain arachidonic (C-20:4) fatty acid. Canola and soybean oils are the only popular vegetable oils with any appreciable amount of an omega-3 fatty acid. Soybean oil has a 7:1 mean ratio of linoleic (C-18:2) to linolenic (C-18:3) fatty acid, while canola has a 2:1 mean ratio. Linseed oil, used primarily as a drying oil for paint, has a high level of linolenic (C-18:3) fatty acid to provide an inverse ratio of linoleic to linolenic of 1:3.1. • Fish oils: Cold water fish, such as menhaden, salmon, sole, herring, anchovies, mackerel, and sardines, contain large amounts of the long-chain omega-3 fatty acids with a profile of around seven times as much omega-3 as omega-6.17 Conventional purification processes, refining, bleaching and deodorization will remove the undesirable heavy metals and pesticide residues, and other pollutants that may be present in crude fish oils. Flavor reversion of fish oils is a more severe problem with these oils than any of the vegetable oils due to the high level of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. Fish oils are a mixture of unsaturates with many different bioactivities, which may have detrimental effects for some applications. • Microalgae oils: The primary food source of all sea life, marine microalgae contributes most of the long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in fish.130 Fermentation technology has been developed for the production of omega-3 fatty acids from microalgae. Microalage oils contain an abundance of a single bioactive component, such as DHA fatty acid, rather than a mixture of unsaturates. This technology includes isolating strains of algae that meet the fatty acid objectives, cultivating, harvesting, and processing of the DHA fatty acid-rich oil. The DHA fraction is purified to obtain a clear, semisolid, odorless oil that is typically blended with a high-oleic oil to a 40% minimum DHA content for oxidative stability. Additionally, microalgae oils have a better oxidative stability than fish oils due to the lower unsaturates level.131 • Fungal oils: Fungal cultures can be grown and fermented with specific conditions for each long-chain fatty acid. The extracted oils contain natural antioxidants, which unfortunately are destroyed by the purification process. The antioxidants are usually replaced with mixed tocopherols and ascorbyl palmitate. • Genetically modified oils: Development of oilseeds rich in omega-3 long-chain unsaturated fatty acids have had some success. Soybean and safflower oils with increased level of omega-3 fatty acids have been reported.16
4.12.2 Omega-3 Fortified Products Products fortified with omega-3 fatty acids have been marketed in Europe and Japan for some time; bread and margarine are two of the most successful. Bread and other yeast-raised products are an ideal medium for omega-3 fortification because the carbon dioxide given off in proofing and baking protects the polyunsaturated oil from oxidation while it is exposed to higher temperatures. Additionally, the relatively short shelf life of most yeast-raised bakery products is less than the time required for oxidation to progress to the point that offensive oxidative flavors and odors are developed. Nevertheless, it has been recommended that white bread fortification be at the lower end of the required level, while dark bread could be enriched at the higher end
Fats and Oils Formulation
339
of the range due to its more robust flavor. Either liquid oil or an encapsulated powder, containing the essential fatty acids, is easily formulated into bread.132 In the case of margarine or spread, the oil environment and the presence of antioxidants in the product aid the incorporation and stabilization of the omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Packaging, required refrigeration, and the addition of antioxidants assist in the oxidative stability of the finished margarine products. Fortification of margarines is not a new concept, but well established with the addition of vitamin A to margarine in 1923 and later margarine oil reformulations to incorporate a high level of polyunsaturated fatty acid oils. Addition of omega-3 fatty acids to meat products is a recent trend in Europe. The omega-3 fatty acid product is stabilized in an emulsion prior to addition to a meat product like meat patties or other processed meats. Refrigeration, packaging, and BHA and BHT antioxidants assist in preserving the oxidative stability of the polyunsaturated fatty acid additions.16 Infant formula manufacturers formulate their products to closely match mother’s milk. DHA and arachidonic fatty acids have been identified as beneficial components of human milk.130 Controlled studies have shown that both of these omega fatty acids support the mental and visual development of infants and that the health benefits of DHA fatty acid extend from prenatal development through adult life.133 REFERENCES
1. Markley, K.S., Nomenclature, classification and description of individual acids, in Fatty Acids, Part 1, 2nd ed., Markley, K.S., Ed., Interscience Publishers, New York, 1960, pp. 34, 35, 36–46, 50–53. 2. Cook, R., Thermally induced isomerism by deodorization, INFORM, 13, 71–76, 2002. 3. Emken, E.A., Dispelling misconceptions with stable isotopes, INFORM, 5, 906–911, 1994. 4. Nawar, W.W., Chemistry, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 1, Y.H. Hui, Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996, p. 399. 5. Gunstone, F.D., Fatty acids and lipid structure, in Lipid Technologies and Applications, F.D. Gunstone and F.B. Padley, Eds., Marcel Decker, Inc., New York, 1997, pp. 1–17. 6. Kabara, J.J., Saturated fats: The new health oil for the next millennium, INFORM, 11, 123–126, 2000. 7. Watkins, B.A., Hennig, B., and Taborek, M., Dietary fat and health, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 1, 5th ed., Hui, Y.H., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996, pp. 168–169. 8. Wainwright, B., Specialty fats and oils, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.A., and Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 503–504. 9. Grundy, S.M. and Denke, M.A., Dietary influences on serum lipids and lipoproteins, J. Lipid Research, 31, 1149–1172, 1999. 10. Nicolosi, R.J., Dietary fat saturation effects on low-density-lipoprotein concentrations and metabolism in various animal models, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 65 (suppl), 1647S-1627S, 1997.
340
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
11. Mensink, R.P., Zock, P.L., Kester, A.D-M., and Katan, M.B., Effects of dietary fatty acids and carbohydrates on the ratio of serum total to HDL cholesterol and on serum lipids and apolipoproteins: A meta-analysis of 60 controlled trials, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 77, 1146–1155, 2003. 12. Haumann, B.F., Stearic acid: A “different” saturated fatty acid, INFORM, 9, 202–208, 1998. 12a. Baer, D.J., Judd, J.T., Clevidence, B.A., and Tracy, R.P., Dietary fatty acids affect plasma markers of inflamation in healthy men fed controlled diets: a randomized crossover study. Am. J. Nutr., 79, 969–973, 2004. 13. Neff, J., Fat city for fat research, Food Process, 59(2), 31–35, 1998. 14. Anon., Nutrient claim for EPA/DHA granted, INFORM, 17, 522, 2006. 15. Omega-3 Information Service, A Lifetime of Good Health, http://www.omega-3info. com/fattyacids.htm (accessed 2006). 16. Turner, J., Nothing “fishy” about omega-3s, Food Prod. Design, April 2006, pp. 57–69. 17. Watkins, C., Fundamental fats, INFORM, 16, 638–640, 2004. 18. Lindemann, J., Merolli, A., and Flider, F.J., GLA oils: A study on consumer purchasing behaviors, INFORM, 17, 342, 2006. 19. Huth, P.J., et al., Polyunsaturated fatty acids in the food supply in the United States: Current trends and health implications, Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed Processing and Utilization, R.F. Wilson, Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2001, pp. 54–61. 20. Raper, N.R., Cronin, F.J., and Exler, J., n-3 Fatty acid content of the U.S. food supply, J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 11, 304–308, 1992. 21. Swern, D., Fats in the diet, Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 3rd ed., D. Swern, Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1964, p. 146. 22. Formo, M.W., Fats in the diet, Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 1, 4th ed., D. Swern, Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1979, p. 242. 23. Bibus, D., Omega-3 health: Significance of cereal food products, Cereal Foods World, 51, 263–266, 2006. 24. Holman, R.T., Johnson, S.B., and Hatch, T.F., A case of human linolenic acid deficiency involving neurological abnormalities, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 35, 617, 1982. 25. Hisch, J.B. and Evans, D., Beyond nutrition: The impact of food on genes, Food Technol., 59, 30, 2005. 26. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21.184.1472, Washington, D.C., Revised April 1, 2005. 27. Djordjevic, D., et al., Adding n-3 fatty acids to foods, INFORM, 16, 56–58, 2005. 28. Hagemann, J.W. et al., Polymorphism in single-acid triglycerides of positional and geometric isomers of ocradecanoic acid, JAOCS, 52, 204–207, 1975. 29. Leth, T., Ovensen, L., and Hansen, K., Fatty acid composition of meat from ruminants, with special emphasis on trans fatty acids, JAOCS, 75, 1998, p. 1001. 30. List, G.R. and Mounts, T.L., Partially hydrogenated-winterized soybean oil, in Handbook of Soy Oil Processing and Utilization, Erickson, D.R., Pryde, E.H., Brekke, O.L., Mounts, T.L., and Falb, R.A., Eds., American Soybean Asociation, St. Louis, MO and AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1980, p. 204. 31. Harper, T., Chemical and physical refining, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed Processing and Utilization, AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2001, p. 22. 32. Decker, K.J., Fats to feel good about, Food Prod. Design, August 2006, p. 70. 33. Zhang, A. and Chen, Z.Y., Oxidation stability of conjugated linolenic acids relative to other polyunsaturated fatty acids, JAOCS, 74, 1611–1613, 1997.
Fats and Oils Formulation
341
34. Mossoba, M., et al., Determination of trans fats by gas chromatography and infrared methods, in Trans Fats Alternatives, Kodali, D.R. and List, G.R., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2005, pp. 47–54. 35. Kapoor, R.P., Jones, S., Reaney, J.T., and Wescott, N.D., Conjugated linolenic acid: Seven decades of achievement, INFORM, 13, 802–805, 2002. 36. Kapoor, R., Westcott, N.D., Martin, J.T., and Jones, S., Conjugated linolenic acid: Seven decades of achievement, II: Physiological properties, INFORM, 14, 482–484, 2003. 37. Christie, W.W., A practical guide to the analysis of conjugated linolenic acid, INFORM, 12, 147–152, 2001. 38. Dunford, N.T., Health benefits and processing of lipid-based nutritionals, Food Technol., 55, 43–44, 2001. 39. Crandall, L., Mother Nature’s nearly perfect food, INFORM, 17, 276, 2006. 40. Hunter, J.E., Trans-fatty acids, effects and alternatives, Food Technol., 56(12), 140, 2002. 41. Crandall, L., Emerging ingredients, INFORM, 14, 62, 2003. 42. Frankel, E., The lipovore’s challenge to food scientists. Part I. Nutritional guidelines on edible fats, INFORM, 18, 469–472, 2007. 43. Chapman, K.W., et al., Oxidation stability of hydrogenated menhaden oil shortening blends in cookies and snacks, JAOCS, 73, 167, 1996. 44. Erickson, D.R. and List, G.R., Fat degradation reactions, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 3, 4th ed., Applewhite, T.H., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1985, pp. 275–277. 45. White, P.J., Flavor quality of fats and oils, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E., and Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 352–353. 46. Cowan, D. and Husum, T.L., Enzymatic interesterification process advantages and production benefits, INFORM, 15, 150–151, 2004. 47. Shimada, Y., et al., Purifications of ethyl docosahexaenoate by selective alcoholysis of fatty acid ethyl esters with immobilized rhizomucor miehei Lipase, JAOCS, 75, 1565, 1998. 48. Fritsch, C.W., Lipid oxidation: The other dimensions, INFORM, 5, 423–436, 1994. 49. Dutton, H.J., Evans, C.D., and Cowan, J C., Status of research on the flavor problem of soybean oil at the Northern Research Laboratory, Am. Assoc. Cereal Chemists, 11, 116–135, 1953. 50. Buck, D.F., Antioxidants in soya oil, JAOCS, 58, 275, 1981. 51. Sherwin, E.R., Antioxidants for vegetable oils, JAOCS, 53, 430–436, 1976. 52. Eastman Chemical Co., Tenox Natural Tocopherols, Technical Data Bulletin 2G-263, Kingsport, TN, 1990. 53. Chahine, N.H. and MacNeill, R.F., Effect of stabilization of crude whale oil with tertiary butylhydroquinone and other antioxidants upon keeping quality of resultant deodorized oil, JAOCS, 51, 37–41, 1974. 54. Sherwin, E.R., Antioxidants for food fats and oils, JAOCS, 49, 468–472, 1992. 55. Luckadoo, B.M. and Sherwin, E.R., Tertiary butylhydroquinone as antioxidant for crude sunflower seed oil, JAOCS, 49, 95–97, 1972. 56. Sherwin, E.R. and Luckadoo, B.M., Studies on antioxidant treatment of crude vegetable oils, JAOCS, 47, 19–23, 1970. 57. Kraybill, H.R. et al., Butylated hydroxyanisole as an antioxidant for animal fats, JAOCS, 26, 449-453, 1949.
342
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
58. Robbins, K. and Sewalt, V., Extending freshness with rosemary extract, INFORM, 16, 534–535, 2005. 59. Jaswir, I., Che Man, Y.B., and Kitts, D.D., Synergistic effects of rosemary, sage, and citric acid on fatty acid retention of palm olein during deep-fat frying, JAOCS, 77, 527–533, 2000. 60. Wanasundara, U.N. and Shahidi, F., Stabilization of seal blubber and menhaden oils with green tea catechins, JAOCS, 73, 1183–1190, 1996. 61. Chen, Z., et al., Antioxidative activity of green tea catechin extract compared with that of rosemary extract, JAOCS, 75, 1141–1145, 1998. 62. Nag, A., Stabilization of flaxseed oil with capsicum antioxidant, JAOCS, 77, 799–800, 2000. 63. Gamez-Meza, N. et al., Antioxidant activity in soybean oil of extracts from Thompson grape bagasse, JAOCS, 76, 1445–1447, 1999. 64. Hamilton, R.J., et al., Effects of tocopherols, ascorbyl palmitate, and lecithin on autoxidation of fish oil, JAOCS, 75, 813–822, 1998. 65. Bessler, T.R. and Ortheoefer, R.T., Providing lubricity in food fat systems, JAOCS, 60, 1765–1768, 1983. 66. Broady, H. and Cochran, M., Shortening for bakery cream icings and cream fillers, The Baker’s Digest, 52(12), 23, 1978. 67. Hoerr, C.W., Morphology of fats, oils, and shortenings, JAOCS, 37(10), 539–546, 1960. 68. Hoerr, C.W., Moncrieff, J., and Paulicka, F.R., Crystallography of shortenings, The Baker’s Digest, 40(4), 38–40, 1966. 69. Hoerr, C.W. and Ziemba, J.V., Fat crystallization points way to quality, Food Eng., 37(5), 90–93, 1965. 70. Wiederman, L.H., Margarine and margarine oil, formulation and control, JAOCS, 55, 825–828, 1988. 71. Posmore, J., Application of modification techniques, in Recent Advances in Chemistry and Technology of Fats and Oils, Hamilton, R.J. and Bhati, A., Eds., Elsevier, London, 1987, pp. 172–175. 72. Mattil, K.F., Plastic shortening agents, in Bailey’s Industrial oil and Fats Products, 3rd ed., Swern, D., Ed., Interscience, New York, 1964, pp. 273–275. 73. Williams, K.A., J. Soc. Chem. Ind., 46, 448–449, 1927. 74. Pantzaris, T.P. and Basiron, Y., The lauric oils, in Vegetable Oils in Food Technology Composition, Properties and Uses, Gunstone, F.D., Ed., CRC Press, Boco Raton, FL, 2002, pp. 185–186, 191. 75. Zhang, H. et al., Production of margarine fats by enzymatic interesterification with silica-granulated thermomyces lanuginosa lipase in a large-scale study, JAOCS, 78, 57–64, 2001. 76. Laning, S.J., Chemical Interesterification of palm, palm kernel and coconut oils, JAOCS, 62, 400–404, 1985. 77. Sonntag, Fat splitting, esterification, and interesterification, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 2, 4th ed., Swern, D., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982, pp. 148–149. 78. Zeitoun, M.A.M. et al., Physical properties of interesterified fat blends, JAOCS, 70, 467–471, 1993. 79. Sreenivasan, B., Interesterification of fats, JAOCS, 55, 796–805, 1978. 80. Chrysam, M.M., Margarines and spreads, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 5th ed., vol. 3, Y.H. Hui, Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996, p. 88.
Fats and Oils Formulation
343
81. Tirtiaux, A., Dry fractionation: A technique and an art, in Edible Fats and Oils Processing: Basic Principles and Modern Practices: World Conference Proceedings, Erickson, D.R., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1990, pp. 136–141. 82. Kellens, M. and Hendrix, M., Fractionation, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E., and Wan, F.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 194–207. 83. Rozendaal, A., Interesterification and fractionation, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed Technology and Utilization, Applewhite, T.H., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1992, pp. 182–185. 84. U.S. Federal Register, Food Labeling: Trans Fatty Acids in Nutrition, 68FR41433 July 11, 2003, pp. 134–137, Washington, D.C. 85. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Volume 2, Section 101.9 Nutritional labeling of food, Washington, D.C. Revised April 1, 2006. 86. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Volume 2, Section 110, Current good manufacturing practice in manufacturing, packing, or holding human food, Washington, D.C. Revised 2006. 87. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Claims That Can Be Made for Conventional Foods and Dietary Supplements, September 2003, pp. 1–4, Washington, D.C. 88. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Volume 2, Section 101.73 Health claims: dietary lipids and cancer, Washington, D.C. Revised April 1, 2006. 89. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Volume 2, Section 101.75 Health claims: dietary saturated fat and cholesterol and risk of coronary heart disease, Washington, D.C. Revised April 1, 2006. 90. Code of Federal Regulation, Title 21, Volume 2, Section 101.83 Health claims: plant sterol/stanol esters and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), Washington, D.C. Revised April 1, 2002. 91. Staff Reporter, Excellent source claim allowed for EPA/DHA combo, Nutra USA Ingredients, 5/4/2006. 92. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2005 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Report, Part D: Science Base, Section 4: Fats, pp. 1-54, Washington, D.C. 93. Code of Federal Regulation, Title 21, Volume 2, Section 101.2, Information panel of package form food, Washington, D.C. Revised April 1, 2002. 94. Code of Federal Regulation, Title 21, Volume 2, Section 101.4, Food; designation of ingredients, Washington, D.C. Revised April 1, 2002. 95. Neergaard, L., Labels to expose another bad fat, The Dallas Morning News, July 10, 2003, pp. 1A, 10A. 96. Latondress, E.–G., Formulation of products from soybean oil, JAOCS, 53, 185–187, 1981. 97. O’Brien, R.D., Formulation: Single feedstock situation, in Hydrogenation: Proceedings of an AOCS Colloquium, Hastert, R., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1987, pp. 155–169. 98. Latondress, E.G., Shortenings and margarines: Basestock preparation and formulation, in Handbook of Soy Oil Processing and Utilization, Erickson, D.R. et al., Eds., American Soybean Association and AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1980, pp. 146–154. 99. List, G.R. and Reeves, R., Trans reduction, in Trans Fats Alternatives, Kodali, D.R. and List, G.R., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2005, pp. 75–77. 100. Thomas III, A.E., Importance of glyceride structure to product formulation, JAOCS, 58, 238–239, 1981.
344
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
101. Patterson, H.B.W., Hydrogenation of vegetable oils, Oleagineux, 28, 585, 1973. 102. Hastert, R.C., Cost/quality/health: The three pillars of hydrogenation, in Proceedings of World Conference, Edible Fats and Oils Processing: Basic Principles and Modern Practices, Erickson, D.R., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1990, pp. 148–149. 103. Nash, N.H. and Brickman, L.M., Food emulsifiers science and art, JAOCS, 49, 457– 461, 1972. 104. Birnbaum, H., The monoglycerides: Manufacture, concentration, derivatives, and applications, The Baker’s Digest, 55(12), 6–16, 1981. 105. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Vol. 2, Section 182.4505, Washington, D.C. Revised April 1, 2002. 106. Dziezak, J.D., Emulsifiers: The interfacial key to emulsion stability, Food Technol., 42(10), 172–186, 1988. 107. Krog, N., Functions of emulsifiers in food systems, JAOCS, 54, 124–131, 1977. 108. Neu, G.D. and Simcox, W.J., Dough conditioning and crumb softening in yeast-raised bakery products with succinylated monoglycerides, Cereal Foods World, 20, 203–208, 1975. 109. Henry, C., Monoglycerides: The universal emulsifier, Cereal Foods World, 40, 734– 738, 1995. 110. Silva, R., Phospholipids as natural surfactants for the cereal industry, Cereal Foods World, 35, 1008–1012, 1990. 111. Sinram, R.D., The added value of specialty lecithins, Oil Mill Gazetteer, Sept., 22–26, 1991. 112. Anon., The Atlas HLB System, 3rd ed., Atlas Chemical Industries, Wilmington, DE, 1963, pp. 3–20. 113. Griffin, W.C. and Lynch, W.C., Surface-active agents, in CRC Handbook of Food Additives, vol. 1, Furia, T.E., Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1972, pp. 404–410. 114. Anon., Grindsted Emulsifiers, Grindsted Products, North Kansas City, MO, pp. 3–5. 115. Anon., Durkee Food Emulsifiers, Durkee Industrial Foods Group, Cleveland, OH, pp. 6–8. 116. Anon., Those Wonderful Disappearing Emulsifiers from Humko Chemical, Humko Chemical Division, Witco Corp., Memphis, TN, pp. 1–3. 117. American Oil and Chemists’ Society, The Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 4th ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1994. 118. Shukla, V.K.S., Confectionery fats, in Edible Fats and Oils Processing — Basic Principles and Modern Practices: World Conference Proceedings, Erickson, D.R., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1990, p. 228. 119. Haumann, B.F., Confectionery fats for special uses, JAOCS, 61, 468–472, 1984. 120. Young, F.V.K., Interchangeability of fats and oils, JAOCS, 62, 372–375, 1985. 121. O’Brien, R.D., Wakelyn, P.J., and Wan, P.J., Cottonseed oil as a trans-fat alternative, Oil Mill Gazetteer, December, 2005, pp. 2–4. 122. Enig, M. G., Trans fatty acids in diets and databases, Cereal Foods World, 41, 1996, pp. 58–63. 123. Anon, New process removes cholesterol from fats, INFORM, 1, 1990, pp. 366–367. 124. Lampert, D., Processes and products of interesterification, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E., and Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 208–222. 125. Wainwright, B., Specialty fats and oils, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E., and Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 505–511.
Fats and Oils Formulation
345
126. Markley, K.S., Esters and esterification, in Fatty Acids Their Chemistry, Properties, Production, and Use, Part 2, Markley, K.S., Ed., Interscience Publishers, New York, 1961, p. 891–892. 127. O’Shea, M., Health benefits of marine based omega-3 fatty acids, Cereal Foods World, 48, 236–237, 2003. 128. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, Washington, D.C., pp. 20–32, 2005. 129. Ratledge, C., Microbial lipids: Commercial realities or academic curiosities, in Industrial Applications of Single Cell Oils, Kyle, D.J. and Ratledge, C., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1992, p. 2. 130. Kyle, D.J., et al., Bioproduction of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) by microalgae, in Industrial Applications of Single Cell Oils, Kyle, D.J. and Ratledge, C., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1992, pp. 287–288, 290. 131. Kyle, D.J., et al., Production and use of single cell oil, which is highly enriched in docosahexaenoic acid, in Lipid Technol., 8, 107–110, 1996. 132. Newton, I. and Snyder, D., Nutritional aspects of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids and their use in bread enrichment, in Cereal Foods World, 42, 126–131, 1997. 133. Martek Nutritional Products Information, www.martekbio.cccm.com/Nutritional Products/Introduction.asp (accessed 2006).
Chapter 5
Shortening Types
5.1 INTRODUCTION Originally, shortening was the term used to describe the function performed by naturally occurring solid fats such as lard and butter in baked products. These fats contributed a “short” (or tenderizing) quality to baked products by preventing the cohesion of the flour gluten during mixing and baking. Shortening later became the term used by all-vegetable oil processors when they abandoned the lard-substitute concept. As the shortening product category developed, the initially limited application also expanded to include all baked products. Today, shortening has become virtually synonymous with fat and includes many other types of edible fats designed for purposes other than baking. In most cases, products identified as shortening will be 100% fat; however, some exceptions are puff-pastry and roll-in shortenings, which may contain moisture. Many fats and oils products are now referred to as shortening to distinguish them from margarine. Generally, if the fat product contains at least 80% fat and has the required vitamin A content, it is margarine. Products that do not meet this criterion can be identified as shortening because it does not have a U.S. standard of identity. Currently, a description for shortening would be processed fats and oils products that affect the stability, flavor, storage quality, eating characteristics, and eye appeal of prepared foods by providing emulsification, lubricity, structure, aeration, a moisture barrier, a flavor medium, or heat transfer. 5.1.1 Historical Background When and how humans learned to use fats and oils is unknown, but it is known that primitive people in all climates used them for food, medicine, cosmetics, lighting, preservatives, lubricants, and other purposes. The use of fats as food was probably instinctive, whereas the other applications most likely resulted from observations of their properties and behavior under various environmental conditions. More than likely, the first fats used by humans were of animal origin and were separated from 347
348
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
the tissue by heating or boiling. Recovery of oil from small seeds or nuts required the development of more advanced methods of processing, such as cooking, grinding, and pressing processes.1 The first animal fats used by humans were probably rendered from wild-animal carcasses. As animals were domesticated, their body fat became an important food source. Lard or hog fat became the preferred meat fat for edible purposes, whereas the other animal fats were utilized for inedible applications. The more pleasing flavor of lard may have been one reason for its choice for edible purposes; however, the principal reason undoubtedly was the plastic consistency of this fat. At room temperature, lard has a good consistency for incorporation into breads, cookies, cakes, and pastries as well as most other baked products. Beef fat and mutton tallow are too firm for this use, and the marine oils available at the time were too fluid.2 Vegetable shortening was an American invention. The expansion of cotton acreage after the Civil War resulted in large quantities of cottonseed oil. Initial use as an inexpensive whale-oil substitute disappeared with development of the U.S. petroleum industry. Thereafter, the European market utilized cottonseed oil in animal feeds and to dilute the more expensive olive oil. This adulteration practice led to tariffs on imported U.S. cottonseed oil, and all exports to Italy were discontinued. Next, high lard prices offered a domestic opportunity for cottonseed oil utilization. Initially, meat packers secretly added cottonseed oil to lard. This practice was uncovered when Armour and Company discovered that they had received deliveries of more lard than the existing hog population could have produced. Public disclosure of this adulteration led to a Congressional investigation, which resulted in mandatory use of the term lard compound.3,4 Major improvements in oil processing had to take place before substantial quantities of cottonseed oil could replace lard as the preferred fat for baking and frying. Alkali refining procedures were developed in Europe around 1840, but were not employed in the United States until the 1880s. This chemical refining process removes free fatty acid and a large proportion of the color pigments, but even refined cottonseed oil still met with only limited acceptance. Consumers expected lard to be white in color, which meant that the straw-colored cottonseed oil had to be bleached to be acceptable as a lard substitute. The first cottonseed oil bleaching was accomplished by exposing it to sunlight in large shallow tanks for up to 18 months. Carbon, the first adsorbent bleaching agent used, was replaced later by Fuller’s earth, with use patents issued in 1880.5 Initially, liquid vegetable oils were converted to solid or plastic fats by blending a high proportion of the vegetable oil with a small quantity of oleostearine or other hard animal fats; however, the unpleasant flavor contributed by the cottonseed oil portion was so strong that the product was not readily accepted. Attempts to chemically remove the offensive flavor or mask it with spices or other flavors were unsuccessful. Deodorization by blowing live steam through the oil at elevated temperatures was introduced around 1891 and was quickly adopted by most American processors.6 Wesson later perfected the deodorization process by exposing the oil to superheated steam in a vacuum.7 Introduction of the catalytic hydrogenation process gave the vegetable oil processors independence from the meatpacking industry and initiated a new era.
Shortening Types
349
Compounds had been dependent on the addition of oleostearine as the stiffening agent, and it was supplied by meatpackers who recognized they had a monopoly and maintained a high cost for the material. Hydrogenation, however, provided a means for converting liquid vegetable oils to a semisolid with a consistency similar to the meat-fat stearine products. Sabatier discovered vapor-phase hydrogenation in Paris, using nickel as a catalyst in 1897. Six years later, Norman, a German working in England, obtained a British patent for hydrogenation, and, in 1906, commercial hydrogenation of whale oil began. Procter & Gamble acquired the U.S. rights to the Norman patent in 1909 and produced the first all-vegetable shortening in 1911. The product was named Kispo, which was later changed to Crisco®, short for crystallized cottonseed oil.8 Crisco is still the leading household shortening in the United States. The success of this hydrogenated cottonseed oil led to litigation by other manufacturers, which led to a U.S. Supreme Court decision invalidating Procter & Gamble’s exclusive use of the Norman patent that cleared the way for all processors to employ the hydrogenation process.7,9 Meatpackers continued to offer lard compounds (later shortened to simply “compounds”), using the hydrogenation process only for the production of hardened oils to serve as occasional substitutes for oleostearine. Cottonseed oil producers had the foresight to abandon the lard-substitute product concept and description and to offer their hydrogenated products as a new food ingredient that has become known as shortening. Thereafter, shortening development followed two divergent courses: all-hydrogenated or a blended-type formulation somewhat similar to the compound concept. The hydrogenation process gave cottonseed-oil shortenings a definite advantage over the compound shortenings offered by the meatpackers. This key process permitted them to change the composition of the inherently liquid oil products to provide a more consistent product. The properties of the hydrogenated cottonseed-oil shortenings could be controlled, whereas the consistency of lard varied according to the time of the year, the variety and age of the hogs, and the type of feed. The superior neutrality, oxidative stability, and uniformity of the hydrogenated cottonseedoil shortenings found favor with commercial bakers and homemakers alike at the expense of the meat-fat products. This was confirmed by consumers’ willingness to pay higher prices for the hydrogenated cottonseed-oil shortenings. Solidification of shortening and margarine into smooth plastic products also posed formidable challenges for the edible-oil industry. Pure lard contains relatively little high-melting fractions, so slow cooling was a satisfactory procedure for production of smooth, plastic lard products. Agitation of shortening products in jacketed, water-chilled tanks, which had been the usual practice for lard, resulted in grainy products for lard compounds containing cottonseed oil as well as for hydrogenated shortenings. An internally refrigerated chill roll developed for crystallizing lard compounds had been patented by Burnham in 1883. The chill roll consisted of a revolving hollow metal cylinder chilled by circulating cold or brine water. A thin layer of lard compound or shortening applied to the revolving drum solidified and was scraped off into a mixing unit, called a picker pan, where crystallization continued and air was incorporated. After picking, the product was forced through a small orifice at high pressure to complete the homogenization of the air and oil. This
350
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
crystallization process allowed the incorporation of higher levels of cottonseed oil in lard compound products.10 In the early 1930s, development of improved heat-transfer equipment for freezing ice cream led to perfection of a closed, continuous, internal, scraped-wall chilling unit that replaced chill rolls for plasticizing shortening and margarine products.11 Votator® equipment chilled and plasticized shortenings and margarines in seconds as the material flowed continuously through a closed, mechanically controlled system. Adoption of this system offered a number of advantages: (1) improved sanitation afforded by a closed system; (2) improved product uniformity provided by more accurate control of nitrogen injection, temperature, pressure agitation, and throughput; (3) cost reductions resulting from labor savings, reduced space requirements, and lower refrigeration demand; and (4) a reduction in product losses.12 Versions of these closed, internal chilling systems are still employed to plasticize shortenings and margarines. In 1933, the introduction of superglycerinated High-Ratio®* shortening brought about significant changes for the baker and the shortening industry. These shortenings contained mono- and diglycerides, which contributed to a finer dispersion of fat particles in cake batters, causing a greater number of smaller-sized fat globules that strengthened the batters. Emulsified shortenings allowed bakers to produce cakes with additional liquids, which permitted higher sugar levels. Additionally, the surface-active agents improved aerating or creaming properties, which reduced the reliance on specific crystalline and solids properties for functionality. This improvement also allowed a reduction of shortening levels in some bakery cake formulations without sacrificing aeration and tenderness qualities. Altogether, the superglycerinated shortenings produced more-moist, higher volume cakes with a fine grain and an even texture and extended shelf life. As a bonus, it was found that lighter icings and fillings with higher moisture levels could be produced with emulsified shortenings and that the shelf life of yeast-raised products was extended.13 Performance improvements were also found in many other food products where aeration, moisture retention, starch complexing, and the other benefits of emulsification helped improve the functionality of shortenings. Development of emulsified shortenings added a new dimension to the fats and oils industry and ushered in the era of tailor-made shortenings. New shortenings specifically designed for special applications, such as layer cakes, pound cakes, cake mixes, breads, sweet doughs, icings, creme fillings, whipped toppings, laminated pastries, and other bakery products, were developed and introduced rapidly after World War II.14 Specialty shortening development fostered further improvements in all aspects of the fats and oils industry and expanded shortenings beyond the baking industry. New food products and concepts developed as dairy analogs and for confectionery, foodservice, and other areas were successful in many cases because of the development of functional specialty shortening products. Increased automation promoted by inflation and labor costs caused food processors to investigate new handling methods for all ingredients in the late 1950s. * The term High Ratio has been copyrighted by the Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH.
Shortening Types
351
Processors using large quantities of packaged shortenings began investigating and converting to bulk handling of these products. These systems in many cases required the food processor to install plasticization equipment in addition to storage and unloading facilities for handling heated shortenings. These bulk handling requirements encouraged the development of liquid shortenings. Through unique processing procedures, these products, consisting of suspended hardfats and emulsifiers or other additives in liquid oil, remained fluid or pumpable at room temperature. It is possible to pump, meter, and bulk store these shortenings without heating. Liquid shortenings depend on emulsifiers or other additives to provide the functionality required for specific product applications — typically, cakes, frying, bread, dairy analogs, etc. Liquid shortenings did not eliminate plasticized packaged or bulk-handled shortenings; instead, they created another shortening type. Shortening products are now developed for a specific food product and, in many cases, for a particular process to prepare that product. Shortening chips and stabilizers were developed to accommodate particular processes while providing a specific functionality. Both of these products are a departure from the traditional solid plastic consistency of the more recent liquid shortening product forms; both types are flake form. Shortening chips provide an alternative process to dough lamination to develop a flaky consistency for new products produced with unique processes, and the stabilizers improve functionality and eye appeal of packaged products for improved marketing appeal. Technology advances have increased the storehouse of knowledge about fats and oils knowledge and led to the introduction of more advanced products for all aspects of the food industry. Specialty shortenings have helped create entirely new food products and improved product extensions for the retail consumer and the foodservice industry. The word shortening no longer identifies the function performed by a fat or oil product, nor does it indicate the type or consistency of the fats and oils product. Shortening products are now produced in solid plastic, liquid, flake, and powdered forms for a diverse application range: bakery products, dairy analogs, snack foods, nutritional supplements, confections, and other prepared foods. 5.1.2 Source Oils Shortenings are a unique food ingredient in that a high degree of interchangeability among the raw materials is possible for many products and uses. However, in order for a particular oil to substitute for another in a given product, additional processing steps may be necessary, which may increase its cost to become an adequate replacement. After this additional processing, if the replacement fat or oil is substitutable in terms of physical and analytical properties in the end product, then the price becomes a major consideration for using the raw material replacement. Experience has shown that small cost differences in competing source oils can markedly change the proportion of the oil types used in a shortening. Shifts in the utilization of various fats and oils in the composition of an individual shortening were more common in the past than at present. Source-oil labeling requirements have made alternative formulations for the same product more difficult. However,
352
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 5.1 U.S. Shortening Source Oils Usage Million Pounds Year
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
18
20
10
45
103
1
1
4
12
W
Cottonseed oil
823
549
365
276
189
Palm oil
NR
NR
NR
90
188
Coconut oil Corn oil
Peanut oil Soybean oil Lard
1940
2000
2005
34
—
—
270
27
W
252
188
213
209e
187e
608e
e
23
12
2
16
NR
NR
NR
NR
212
841
1169
2182
2651
4004
7908
7779
17
177
480
430
378
264
239
145e 172e
Tallow
58
31
268
522
673
637
283
Unidentified
44
27
3
7
18
14
191
1
1196
1727
2301
3580
4200
5684
9023
8918
11.0
12.6
17.3
18.2
22.3
23.0
29.4
Total Per capita, lbs
Notes: e = estimated, W = withheld, NR = none recorded.
shortening customers may still substitute shortenings produced with alternative source oils that have comparable performance characteristics. Table 5.1 tracks the changes in source oil utilization for U.S. shortenings from 1940 through 2005.2,15-17 Lard utilization as a shortening agent decreased to a low point in 1940 when cottonseed oil became the dominant source oil for shortening production. Interestingly, soybean oil had the second highest shortening usage at this early date and accounted for almost 18% of the shortening total. The next decade, which included World War II, was a time of change for shortening’s source-oil utilization, as illustrated by a comparison of the 1940 and 1950 usage: Soybean oil replaced cottonseed oil as the highest volume vegetable oil at just under half of the total requirement (48.7%), and the introduction of interesterified or crystal-modified lard in 1950 helped return this raw material to shortening production. Interesterification modified the triglyceride structure of lard to provide consistency, appearance, and creaming properties comparable to the all-vegetable shortenings. Soybean oil emerged from being a minor, little-known, problematic oil because of the unavailability of other source oils during World War II. After the war, these volume gains were in jeopardy unless adequate technology could be developed to improve the flavor stability of soybean oil products. At the close of World War II, it was learned that the German oilseed industry had developed a recipe to cure soybean oil reversion, which amounted to the treatment of deodorized oil with citric acid to chelate prooxidant metals.18 Citric acid treatment improved the flavor stability of soybean oil, as did the other identified technologies. Modification by hydrogenation provided a practical but not complete solution to the soybean oil flavor reversion problem.19 Reduction of the linolenic fatty acid content increased the oxidative stability to an acceptable level.18 This solution made hydrogenation crucial for maintaining flavor stability for shortenings, margarines and salad oils made with soybean oil. These changes, along with other processing improvements and controls, helped
Shortening Types
353
soybean oil reach and maintain a dominate position as a source oil for shortenings in 1960, satisfying just over 50% of the total oil requirements. Soybean oil’s share of the shortening requirements continued to increase until the 2005 crop year when it appeared to only maintain an 87.5% market share. Recent nutritional research has connected trans-isomers, primarily produced during hydrogenation, with unfavorable effects on cholesterol. These findings have prompted revised labeling regulations to include a declaration of trans fatty acids content on the Nutritional Facts Panel for food products beginning January 1, 2006. Elimination or reduction of the trans fatty acids in edible oil ingredients has necessitated the investigation of alternate source oils and/or modification processes for most shortening. Palm oil threatened to become a major source oil for U.S. shortenings in the mid-1970s. It grew from a level too small to report in 1960 to over 16% of the total shortening raw material requirement in 1975. Attractive palm-oil costs had encouraged most fats and oils processors to investigate its use wherever possible. Palm oil was found to be an excellent plasticization agent to force shortening’s crystal habit to β′, and the potato processors used large quantities for frying, thus the growth of palm oil use in shortenings was primarily at the expense of cottonseed oil and tallow. Palm oil usage leveled off at about 5% of the shortening requirement before a drastic decline was fueled by unfavorable publicity regarding potential nutritional concerns, particularly regarding saturated fatty acids’ effect on atherosclerosis. Palm oil usage in shortening dropped to less than 1.5% in the early 1990s. Coincidentally, nutritional concerns appear to have renewed U.S. interest in palm oil. Efforts to reduce the dependence on hydrogenation have made the high natural saturated fatty acid content of palm oil attractive. Coconut oil and the other lauric oils are not among the more desirable oils for most shortening products because of their short plastic range, tendency to foam in deep-fat frying when mixed with other fats, and the soapy flavor that develops with hydrolysis. However, the short plastic range contributed by a sharp melting point is advantageous for fillers for cookies and candies; it provides excellent product “getaway” in the mouth. Coconut oil has an excellent frying stability when isolated from other oils because of its high level of saturates, and it was a popular frying medium for Mexican foods, which probably contributed to the high level used for shortening production in 1980 and 1981. This use also suffered from unfavorable publicity that convinced the foodservice industry to discontinue using coconut oil for frying and to change to a shortening with a healthier image. This change undoubtedly accounted for most of the corn oil utilization for shortening in 1990, which decreased considerably after the 1991–1992 crop year, indicating that other vegetable oils, probably soybean oil, have replaced it for foodservice frying. Formulation efforts to reduce trans fatty acids may increase the use of the lauric oils, coconut and palm kernel, to help provide the steep solids slopes required for some shortenings. Both lard and tallow became important shortening raw materials after meat fats regained popularity in the mid-1950s. Two of the reasons for the meat fat’s improved status were (1) major fastfood marketing that promoted the beefy flavor imparted to French fries fried in tallow shortenings, and (2) interesterification of lard to give it performance in baking equivalent to that of hydrogenated vegetable oils. Later,
354
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
technology was developed to replace interesterified lard with tallow and vegetable oil blends for more attractive product costs. Meat-fat usage grew after 1950 until cholesterol concerns brought pressure on the major end users to provide food products that had better nutritional images. Use of animal fats in shortenings decreased to less than 6.0% for the 2000 reporting year and appears to be maintaining this level. The total usage of U.S. shortenings increased more than seven-fold in the 65 years between 1940 and 2005, and the per person usage just about tripled between 1950 and 2005. Increased use of shortenings partly reflects the changing eating habits of Americans — in time, place, and frequency of eating. Convenience and snack foods have risen sharply in popularity, and a similar growth has occurred in the foodservice industry. It has been estimated that more than 45% of the U.S. food dollar is consumed away from home. These changes have affected the shortening type and quantity requirements to meet the demands of the foodservice and food processor industries for specialty fats offering product and performance improvements; at the same time, household shortening demand is experiencing a decline. Source-oil changes are caused by economics in many cases, but many of the recent changes have been made to improve the nutritional image. The nutritional challenges ahead may require that technology efforts be directed toward changes in the composition of the source oil. Plant-breeding technology and genetic engineering have made it possible to produce oils that are enhanced in a single component or to essentially eliminate an undesirable component. Table 5.2 compares the fatty acid compositions of three oilseed modifications that are available commercially. Sunflower and safflower hybrids are available with high-oleic fatty acid contents and substantially reduced linoleic contents. Canola oil is the result of rapeseed or mustard seed modifications to essentially eliminate the erucic fatty acid (C-22:1). These and other changes that have been achieved with oilseed plants are reviewed in chapter 1. The modified oils currently available have not been designed or used for Table 5.2 Hybrid Oilseeds: Fatty Acid Comparisons Fatty Acid Composition, % C-14:0 Myristic
Safflower Oil
Sunflower Oil
Rapeseed Oil
Regular
High-Oleic
Regular
High-Oleic
Regular
Canola
0.1
—
0.1
—
—
0.1
C-16:0 Palmitic
6.8
3.6
7.0
3.7
4.0
4.1
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
—
0.3
C-18:0 Stearic
2.3
5.2
4.5
5.4
2.0
1.8
C-18:1 Oleic
12.0
81.5
18.7
81.3
34.0
60.9
C-18:2 Linoleic
0.4
7.2
67.5
9.0
17.0
21.0
0.1
0.8
—
7.0
8.8
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
—
0.7
C-20:1 Gadoleic
0.1
0.2
0.1
—
9.0
1.0
C-22:0 Behenic
0.2
1.2
0.7
0.1
—
0.3
C-18:3 Linolenic C-20:0 Arachidic
C-22:1 Erucic
—
—
—
—
26.0
0.7
C-24:1 Lignoceric
—
0.3
—
—
—
0.2
Shortening Types
355
shortenings, except for canola oil, which still requires modification when utilized for shortenings; however, theoretically, plant biotechnology should be able to provide almost any desired oil composition.20 This theory is reinforced by the high-lauric, fatty acid, canola oil development.21 Thus, sometime in the future, farmers may start breeding desired performance and nutritional aspects into the oils rather than relying on processing to provide the desired shortening performance characteristics. 5.1.3 Shortening Product Forms Three shortening types or forms have emerged to satisfy the requirements of the food industry: (1) plasticized semisolid, (2) liquid or pumpable, and (3) flakes, beads, or powders; additionally, almost all shortening packaged products can be handled in bulk quantities: • Plasticized semisolid shortenings: Most plasticized semisolid shortenings are identified and formulated for optimum performance in the end product. Generalpurpose shortenings are identified as all purpose, unemulsified, emulsified, animal–vegetable blends, or the like, whereas the trend is toward classifying most other shortenings by the intended usage (e.g., cake and icing, mellorine, bread, frying, and so on). • Liquid shortenings: The liquid or pumpable shortening designation covers all fluid suspensions that consist of a hardfat, usually β-tending, or a high melting emulsifier dispersed in a liquid oil. This shortening type was developed for bulk handling and metering at room temperature and easier handling of packaged product that can be volumetrically measured and poured. • Flakes, beads, or powdered shortenings: Shortening flakes, beads, or powders are composed of higher melting edible-oil products solidified into these forms for ease in handling, quicker remelting, or to serve a specific function in a food product. • Bulk handling: Food processors that use a shortening product in sufficiently large quantities most frequently purchase these products in liquid bulk form. Shipments are made in 40M- to 50M-pound-capacity tank trucks or 150M- to 180M-poundcapacity railcars. Bulk handling systems for shortenings that are normally plasticized for package shipment require the food processor to have processing equipment in addition to storage facilities — specifically, systems for chilling and plasticizing the shortening products. Freshly plasticized shortenings may be added directly to some products without tempering where crystallization properties are assisted by emulsifiers, such as in cake mixes; however, other products require tempering to perform properly.
5.2 PLASTICIZED SHORTENING APPLICATIONS Development of a shortening product for a food application depends on many factors. These factors may differ from customer to customer, depending on the equipment, processing limitations, product preference, customer base, and many other requirements. Shortening products are now being designed to satisfy individual specific requirements as well as to offer products with a broad general appeal. The
356
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
design criteria for a general-appeal product must be of a broader nature than is true for a specific product or process. Three steps are involved in the development of a functional shortening product:
1. Product requirements: Identification of the shortening functionality requirements for end-use product application, shelf life, and process requirements of the industry or a particular food processor’s operation. 2. Composition: Shortening formulation development, which includes the fats and oils components and the supplemental additives, with the tolerance ranges for each identified to provide both optimum and uniform functionality. 3. Processing conditions: Chemical and physical processing conditions specific to the shortening that are critical to application performance. The processes involved may begin with raw-material sourcing and continue through tempering and delivery to the customer.
The important attributes of a shortening in a food product vary considerably. In some food items, the flavor contribution of the shortening is of minor importance; however, it does contribute a beneficial effect to the eating quality of the finished products. This fact is evident with the recent introductions of fat-free products; most of these products lacked the eating characteristics contributed by fats and oils. In most applications, shortenings are multifunctional. Shortenings provide a heat-transfer medium, lubricity, and flavor to fried foods; aeration, lubricity, and structure to cakes, icings, fillings, creme fillers, and whipped toppings; lubricity and structure to baked pastries, such as crusts, Danish pastries, and puff pastries; and lubricity with increased shelf life and softness to yeast-raised products, such as bread and sweet rolls. Shortening, therefore, is a major contributor to the characteristic structure of most prepared food products and has a significant effect on the finished product quality. The physical characteristics of the fats and oils utilized for a shortening are of primary importance in the design of a product for specific use. Oils can be modified through various processes to produce the desired properties. Hydrogenation has been the primary process used to change the physical characteristics of shortenings in the United States. The melting point and solids profile of an oil can be completely altered with this process, and the changes can be controlled by the conditions used for the hydrogenation process. Control of the hydrogenation conditions and the endpoint enables the processor to better meet the desired physical characteristics of the shortening products; however, demand for shortenings free of trans fatty acids has forced processors to use other processes to modify oils for functionality, such as interesterification, fractionation, and genetically modified oil (GMO) product blends. Although formulation strongly influences consistency, crystal structure, and performance, the method of plasticization and tempering is also critical to application performance. Shortenings are plasticized before filling to make them uniform throughout, to effect a more attractive appearance, and to improve performance. The manner in which a shortening is solidified has a pronounced effect on formulation, size, and the rate of crystal transformation. Solidification and texturizing of shortening is usually achieved by a shock-chilling process where heated fat is rapidly cooled in scraped-surface tubular heat exchangers followed by working or crystallization
Shortening Types
357
units, filling, and quiescence tempering. The chiller units are designed to remove the heat of crystallization, transform crystals, and perform mechanical work, whereas the crystallizers improve the plasticity and texture of the solidified shortening. After filling, most baking shortenings are tempered for 24 to 72 hours at 85°F (29.4°C) to attain optimum consistency and creaming properties. The tempering process raises the temperature of all the individual crystals uniformly to the desired point without agitation during the later stages of crystal transformation. 5.3 LIQUID SHORTENING APPLICATIONS Prior to the use of emulsifiers, antioxidants, and antifoamers, fats and oils products relied solely on fatty acid composition, crystal habit, plasticization, and tempering for performance. The aerating function of plastic shortenings is correlated with the polymorphic form of the triglyceride, whereas the level of unsaturation or saturation affects shelf life and frying stability. Fats and oils that exist in the small β′-crystal form aerate batters much more thoroughly than those in the large β form, and saturation of the unsaturated fatty acids eliminates a reaction site for oxygen, thus extending oxidative stability to improve shelf life and frying stability. With the addition of emulsifiers, antioxidants, or antifoamers, the crystal form and saturation levels of the base oils are still important, but these additives supplement the functionality previously provided solely by the composition of the fats and oils. These additives have significantly reduced the dependence on solid fats for acceptable performance, which led to the development and introduction of fluid or liquid shortenings for use in both yeast-raised and chemically leavened baked foods, for foodservice deep-fat and pan frying, and for dairy analog products. Liquid or pumpable shortenings combine the highly functional characteristics exhibited by plastic shortenings with the bulk handling characteristics of a liquid oil. A liquid shortening is a stable dispersion of solids with the proper polymorphic form in a continuous oil phase that is both flowable and pumpable over a temperature range of 60 to 90°F (15.6 to 32.2°C). The solids are derived from either hardfats or emulsifiers, sometimes both. The choice of liquid oil is governed by the level of oxidative stability required, and the solids choice is dependent on the specific end-use application. The type and level of solids are important considerations when producing a stable fluid suspension. In contrast to plastic shortenings, it is desirable to formulate β-stable shortenings in which large crystals tend to form a stable dispersion. Aeration properties for cakes, normally associated with a smooth, plastic consistency developed by β′ source oils, rapid chilling, and tempering, is achieved for liquid shortenings by utilizing the appropriate emulsifier system. Oxidative stability for products requiring lubrication with a bland flavor is improved by the addition of antioxidants. Dimethylpolysiloxane is a highly functional antifoaming agent that inhibits oxidation to allow a liquid opaque shortening to perform like a higher melting plasticized frying shortening. The crystallization process for liquid shortenings is equally important to the baseoil composition to provide a β-crystal matrix in a concentration that will maintain
358
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
a viscosity low enough for pumping or pouring, but high enough for a prolonged stable suspension. Liquid shortening processing involves proper ingredient selection, proper dissolution of additives and hardfats in the liquid oil, and controlled crystallization of the product. Liquid shortening crystallization procedures for products with low and high hardfat levels are presented and discussed in chapter 2. Liquid shortenings do not require tempering after crystallization and can be shipped to customers in packages and as bulk product immediately after processing. In both cases, ease of use and handling compared to plasticized shortenings are advantages. Packaged liquid shortenings may be poured from the container and measured volumetrically. Liquid shortenings handled in bulk quantities do not require heated storage facilities and can be pumped and metered at room temperature. 5.4 FLAKES, CHIPS, AND POWDERED SHORTENING APPLICATIONS The term shortening flake describes the high-melting, edible-oil products solidified into a thin flake form for ease in handling, for quicker remelting, or for a specific function in a food product. The traditional flaked products have been the saturated oil products known as stearines, titers, or low-iodine-value hardfats. The hardfat flakes have been joined by products formulated for special uses where the flake form is desirable. These specialty flaked products are shortening chips and stabilizers for various food applications. A third form of low-iodine-value, high melting point fats and oils products are powdered shortenings. Hydrogenation has been the preferred process to produce hardfats, stabilizers, and shortening chips. Hydrogenation selectivity is not important for the hardfats because the reactions are carried out to almost complete saturation; however, selectivity is very important for the proper functionality of both the shortening chips and some of the stabilizers. Most domestic oil shortening chips usually have melting points in the range of 110 to 118°F (43 to 48°C). Lower melting point domestic oil chips many times require refrigeration before use to maintain the chip form and to prevent them from fusing together in the package. Shortening chips are selectively hydrogenated to attain a steep solids slope with a melting point as low as possible while still allowing the product to maintain the chip form after packaging, during shipment to the food processor, while being processed into the finished product, and until that product is prepared by the consumer. Flavors, colors, spices, and other materials can be encapsulated in the shortening chips for protection from oxidation and convenient incorporation in food products. Most shortening chip products can be formulated from the hydrogenated basestock system in Table 4.6, chapter 4, with a blend of selectively hydrogenated basestocks or with a specially hydrogenated base using a sulfur-proportioned catalyst for a steeper solids slope, depending on the desired melting point and solids fat requirements. Reformulation to eliminate or reduce trans fatty acids normally means that the hydrogenated stocks must be replaced. However, the hardfats are hydrogenated to a saturation point that has eliminated almost all of the unsaturated fatty acids. In the case of the hardfats, because trans are a form of unsaturated fatty acids, they are also
Shortening Types
359
eliminated or reduced to minor level. The shortening chips have very high trans fatty acid levels when selectively hydrogenated with a nickel catalyst and the sulfur-proportioned catalyzed products have a higher trans fatty acid level because the process is designed to produce the maximum amount of trans for a steep solids profile, sharp melt, and exceptional oxidative stability. The high trans fatty acid hydrogenation technique was developed to allow the use of domestic oils to replace imported lauric oils: coconut and palm kernel oils. Therefore, a logical technique to reduce trans while maintaining a steep solids profile, sharp melt, and excellent oxidative stability is a return to formulating with hydrogenated lauric oils that will contain only a small trans fatty acid content. The desired solids fat melting characteristics can also be attained with selective blending of source oils followed with interesterification. Icing stabilizers were developed using the nonselective hydrogenation technique to produce a flat solids profile with melting points normally ranging from 110 to 125°F (45 to 52°C). The flat solids slopes for these products help to maintain softness while stabilizing the coatings, glazes, icings, and other bakery products. The flat solids slope may also be attained using directed interesterification for a product free of trans fatty acids. Two types of powdered shortenings produced are: (1) spray-dried fat emulsions with a carrier and (2) spray-chilled or beaded hardfat blends. The spray-dried powdered shortenings are partially hydrogenated shortenings encapsulated in a water-soluble material. Shortenings can be homogenized in solution with a variety of carriers (e.g., skim milk, corn syrup solids, sodium caseinate, soy isolate). Emulsifiers may be included with the shortening for finished product functionality. Fat contents usually range from 50 to 80%, depending on the original emulsion composition before spray drying.22 The spray-dried powdered shortenings are used in some prepared mixes for their ease in blending with the other dry ingredients. Hardfats can be powdered or beaded without the aid of a carrier. Three principal methods of forming powder or beaded fats are practiced in the United States: spray chilling, grinding flaked product, and spray flaking and grinding. Spray-chilled hardfats have a disadvantage regarding feeding or blending accuracy. The spherical shape of the spray-chilled powders may act as roller bearings to give erratic feeding rates with vibratory feeding systems or may stratify in blends of dry materials. Beaded products produced by grinding flakes or spray flaking for immediate grinding have granular shapes that can be metered at uniform rates with vibratory or screw feeders and resist stratification or separation in mixes with other granular materials. REFERENCES
1. Markey, K.S., Historical and general, in Fatty Acids: Their Chemistry, Properties, Production, and Uses, 2nd ed., Part 1, Markley, K.S., Ed., Interscience, New York, 1960, p. 13. 2. Mattil, K.F., Plastic shortening agents, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 3rd ed., Swern, D., Ed., Interscience, New York, 1964, pp. 265–271, 296. 3. Jones, L.A. and King, C.C., Cottonseed Oil, National Cottonseed Products Association and the Cotton Foundation, Memphis, TN, 1990, pp. 5–7.
360
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
4. Meyer, L.H., Fats and other lipids, in Food Chemistry, Meyer, L.H., Ed., AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1975, p. 55. 5. Black, H.C., Edible cottonseed oil products, in Cottonseed and Cottonseed Products, Alton E. Bailey, A.E., Ed., Interscience, New York, 1948, pp. 732–733. 6. Morris, C.E., Mechanics of deodorization, JAOCS, 26, 607, 1949. 7. Wrenn, L.B., Pioneer oil chemists: Allbright, Wesson, INFORM, 6, 98, 1995. 8. Wrenn, L.B., Eli Whitney and his revolutionary gin, INFORM, 4, 12–15, 1993. 9. Hastert, R.C., Oilseed processing: Past, present, and future, INFORM, 9, 1140, 1998. 10. O’Brien, R.D., Shortening technology, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E., and Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 422–426. 11. Rini, S.J., Refining, bleaching, stabilization, deodorization, and plasticization of fats, oils, and shortenings, JAOCS, 37, 519, 1960. 12. Slaughter, Jr., J.E., Proceedings: A Six Day Short Course in Vegetable Oils, August 16–21, AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1948, p. 120. 13. Hartnett, D.I., Cake shortenings, JAOCS, 54, 557, 1977. 14. Robinson, H.E. and Mattel, K.F., Fifty years of progress in the technology of edible fats and oils, JAOCS, 36, 434–436, 1959. 15. USDA, Fats and Oils Situation, U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C., 1977. 16. USDA, Oil Crops Situation and Outlook Yearbook, U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C., 1985. 17. Ash, M. and Dohlman, E., Oil Crops Situation and Outlook Yearbook, U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 73–74. 18. Dutton, H.J., History of the development of soy oil for edible uses, JAOCS, 58, 234–236, 1981. 19. Frankel, E.N., Soybean oil flavor stability, in Handbook of Soy Oil Processing and Utilization, AOCS, Champaign, IL and American Soybean Association, St. Louis, MO, 1980, pp. 230 and 240. 20. Haumann, B.F., The goal: Tastier and “healthier” fried foods, INFORM, 7, 320–334, 1996. 21. Del Vecchio, A.J., High-laurate canola, INFORM, 7, 230–242, 1996. 22. Weiss, T.J., Shortening: Introduction, in Food Oils and Their Uses, 2nd ed., AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1983, pp. 129–130.
Chapter 6
Baking Shortenings
6.1 INTRODUCTION The term baking applies not only to the production of bread, but also to all food products in which flour is the basic material and to which heat is applied directly by radiation from the walls or top and bottom of an oven or heating appliance. More particularly, baking includes the production of items, such as bread, cake, pastry, biscuits, cracker, cookies, and pies where flour is the essential and principal ingredient for the base product; baking also includes the toppings, frostings, fillings, etc., that finish the baked product. Baking as practiced by the homemaker is an art with an occasional failure, whereas baking as practiced by the professional baker is an engineering science in which the volumes involved make uniformity an absolute necessity and failures are disastrous. Survival of the commercial baker requires quality production at the lowest costs, which requires uniform, consistent performance from all of the ingredients employed. Shortenings are a very important ingredient for the baking industry because they comprise from 10 to 50% of most baked products. Shortenings contribute to baked products in a number of ways: (1) impart shortness, or richness and tenderness to improve flavor and eating characteristics; (2) enhance aeration for leavening and volume; (3) promote desirable grain and texture qualities; (4) provide flakiness in pie crusts, Danish, and puff pastries; (5) provide lubrication to prevent the wheat gluten particles from adhering together, which retards staling; (6) enhance moisture retention for shelf-life improvement; and (7) provide structure for cakes, icings, and fillings.1 All-purpose shortening with a wide plastic range, made by blending a nonselectively hydrogenated basestock with a low iodine value (IV) hardfat, has been the building block for many different general and specialty baking shortenings. Figure 6.1 traces development of the various bakery products that use the all-purpose shortening type formulation to produce the required functionality. The technology that made production of the all-purpose shortening possible has led to the development of a number of specialized shortenings. Hydrogenation and blending of different basestocks and source oils to control the solids fat index (SFI), melting 361
362
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Wide Plastic Range Bakery Shortenings
Unemulsified
Emulsified
General Purpose Shortening
Cake & Icing Shortening
Cookie Shortening
Icing & Filling Shortening
Cookie Filler Shortening
Yeast-Raised Shortening
Pie Crust Shortening
Specialty Cake Shortening
Biscuit Shortening
Mix Shortening
Donut Shortening
Retail Cake
Danish Roll-In
Bakery Cake
Puff Paste Roll-In
Retail Frosting
Figure 6.1 Bakery shortening evolution from all-purpose to specialty shortenings.
characteristics, and crystal habit has provided the consistency control that allows fats and oils processors to design shortenings with specific functional properties. The addition of emulsifiers has provided emulsification for higher moisture levels, aeration, moisture retention, starch complexing, antistaling, palatability improvements, and other functionalities to further extend the performance of bakery shortenings. The two techniques for wide-plasticity shortenings, emulsified and nonemulsified,
Baking Shortenings
363
have resulted in the development of the specialized products outlined in Figure 6.1, as well as other products. In the years after the introduction of mono- and diglycerides, a number of new emulsifiers were developed that provided shortening processors and bakers with better tools. Properly used, these emulsifiers reduced the dependence on plasticized or solid shortening crystal forms for aerating and structural properties. The more highly emulsified shortenings were first used by the retail cake mix industry to shorten mixing times, increase cake volumes, and improve mixing tolerances. The more sophisticated emulsifier systems developed were able to assume the entire aerating function of crystalline fat and made the commercialization of fluid shortenings possible. Likewise, developments of surfactants that were able to complex starch or interact with flour proteins were partially responsible for the acceptance of liquid shortenings for yeast-raised products. The attributes of the emulsifiers and the development of several unique processing techniques allowed the introduction of fluid shortenings consisting of suspended solid hardfats and emulsifiers in a liquid oil base for cakes and another for yeast-raised products. These liquid shortening products provided some of the baking industry’s ideal shortening attributes — a functional shortening that could be stored in a tank unheated and could be metered and pumped in exact proportions to the desired mixer. Liquid shortenings have fallen short of the ideal expectations because they usually require agitation to maintain uniformity and are very specific as to functionality, that is, liquid cake shortenings can be utilized only for cake production, which may also be limited to the type of cake, and are ineffectual for icings, fillings, and other batter or yeast-raised products. Fluid bakery shortenings have had the most success with large cake and continuous bread producers that have dedicated automated product lines. Shortening flake products have quietly evolved as specialty products for specific bakery products. In almost all cases, the product functionality is dependent on the solids-to-liquid ratios or SFI and the melting point. These characteristics, along with the flake or beaded form, provide convenient handling and quick melting or a controlled melt for a special function in a baked product. The traditional flaked products, low-iodine-value hardfats, are produced for various uses that are usually concerned with adjustments in the melting characteristics of a product. Shortening chips and stabilizers are blends of oils or are a single-source oil specially hydrogenated to attain specific functional characteristics for use in biscuits, pizza crusts, breads, yeast-raised rolls, icings, donut production, various prepared mixes, and other bakery products. 6.2 ALL-PURPOSE SHORTENINGS Bakery all-purpose shortenings are compromise products designed for performance in baked products, icings, and fillings as well as deep-fat frying. Plastic range is important for bakery all-purpose shortenings because of the consistency changes with temperature. Needless to say, products with the best plastic range are those that are softest at low temperatures while also firmest at high temperatures. A perfect
364
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
400 350
Penetrations
300 250 200 150 100 50 0
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Solids Fat Index 60-T CSO @ 85°F
56-T Palm @ 85°F
60-T CSO @ 80°F
56-T Palm @ 80°F
Plastic Range
Plastic Range
Figure 6.2 Effect of 80 and 85°F tempering on shortenings with cottonseed oil and palm oil hardstock.
plastic range, if it could be produced, would have the same desirable consistency at both high and low temperatures. Nevertheless, shortenings become brittle above the plastic range and soft below this range; both conditions adversely affect creaming and workability properties. Shortenings are normally plastic and workable at SFI values between 15 and 25; therefore, all-purpose shortenings that depend on consistency for performance in baked products are formulated with flat SFI slopes that remain plastic for a wider temperature range than shortenings with steeper SFI slopes. Creaming properties and plastic range in a shortening depend, first, on the proper formulation and, second, on the chilling and tempering conditions used. All-purpose and other wide plastic-range shortenings are normally quick chilled to 60 to 70°F (15.6 to 21.1°C), followed by a crystallization or working stage, packaging, and then tempering at 85°F (26.7°C) for a 24- to 72-hour period, depending on the package size. The effect of tempering is illustrated in Figure 6.2, which compares the effect of 60-titer cottonseed oil hardfat and 56-titer palm oil hardfat stabilized all-purpose shortenings tempered at 80 and 85°F for 48 hours. Consistency was measured by penetration evaluations at 80°F (26.7°C) for shortenings with SFI values at 80°F that ranged from 15 to 21% with each hardfat. The plastic range for this penetration method was defined as too soft above 300 mm/10 g and too firm below 150 mm/10 g. This evaluation indicated that acceptable all-purpose shortenings could be produced with either hardfat; however:
Baking Shortenings
365
1. Higher levels of palm oil hardfat were required to produce SFI values comparable with those for the product with cottonseed oil hardfat. 2. Equivalent shortening SFI values with palm oil and cottonseed oil hardfats did not provide equivalent shortening consistency as measured by penetration. The palm oil-hardened shortening was consistently softer than cottonseed oil-hardened shortening at the same SFI value. About 2% higher solids were required with palm oil hardfat to achieve a consistency equivalent to the shortening stabilized with cottonseed oil hardfat. 3. Cottonseed oil-hardened shortenings tempered at 85°F (29.4°C) had penetration results comparable to the palm-oil-hardened shortenings tempered at 80°F (26.7°C). Palm oil-hardened shortenings may perform better when tempered at 80°F rather than 85°F, especially with SFI values at 80°F below 17%.
Penetrations performed at only one temperature do not indicate the working range for a shortening. Working range can be measured by penetrations over a range of temperatures, especially those to which the shortening may be exposed in end-use applications. Most bakeries and foodservice kitchens have limited temperature control, and a wide range of temperatures are likely to prevail, so, all-purpose shortenings must be formulated and processed to be tolerant to broad variation in working temperatures and to be resistant to breakdown during mixing. Typically, all-purpose shortenings have been formulated with 3 to 15% essentially fully saturated β′ hardfat added to a partially hydrogenated basestock, a blend of tallow with vegetable oil, or interesterified lard. The functionality of an all-purpose shortening at any temperature is largely dependent on the solids content at that temperature. All-purpose shortenings are formulated to be not too firm at 50 to 60°F (10 to 15.6°C) and not too soft at 90 to 100° F (32.2 to 37.8°C). The β′ hardfats are added to extend the plastic range, improve the tolerance to high temperatures, and establish the shortenings crystal habit. Almost fully saturated cottonseed oil, palm oil, or tallow have been the usual sources for the β′-crystal-forming hardstocks, which function as plasticizers for improving creaming properties, texture, and consistency. Some typical vegetable and animal/vegetable all-purpose shortening formulations are presented in Table 6.1. Hydrogenation of a fat and oil basestock increases the oxidative and frying stability. Selective hydrogenation conditions and lower basestock iodine values provide the best oxidative and frying stability; however, nonselective hydrogenation conditions produce flat SFI curves and, consequently, a wide plastic range. As base hardness is increased, the level of hardstock required to reach a desired consistency decreases. Hardstock reduction reduces the plastic range and heat tolerance of the shortening. Therefore, oxidative stability improvements are achieved at the expense of plasticity, and a wide plastic range can be achieved at the expense of oxidative and frying stability. Additionally, oxidative stability results do not average. Oxidative stability is directly related to the level and type of unsaturated fatty acids present in a blend. Thus a 50:50 blend of a basestock with a 40-hour AOM (active oxygen method) with one that has a 100-hour AOM will not have a 70-hour AOM stability, but one closer to the 40-hour AOM of the most unsaturated basestock.2 The extent that one attribute
366
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 6.1 All-Purpose Shortening Formulations Basestock, %
All-Vegetable
Animal-Vegetable
80-IV H-CSO
90.0
—
—
—
—
—
91.0
88-IV H-SBO
—
88.0
—
—
—
89.0
—
96-IV H-SBO
—
—
—
35.0
—
—
—
109-IV H-SBO
—
—
—
—
14.5
—
—
RB Palm Oil
—
—
91.0
55.0
—
—
—
Tallow
—
—
—
—
82.5
—
—
10.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
56-T Palm Oil
—
12.0
9.0
10.0
—
—
—
59-T Tallow
—
—
—
—
3.0
11.0
9.0
60-T CSO
Solids Fat Index 10.0°C/50°F
26.0±
31.0±
25.0±
32.0±
26.7°C/80°F
20.0±
20.0±
18.0±
21.0±
40.0°C/104°F
9.0 min
11.0±
10.0±
9.0±
Nutritional Calculations Trans fatty acids, %
9.5
18.6
0.0
5.4
6.2
18.8
23.0
Saturated fatty acids, %
34.4
25.9
54.5
43.0
49.1
25.1
24.6
—
—
—
—
935
121
99
Cholesterol, ppm
Notes: IV = iodine value, H = hydrogenated, CSO = cottonseed oil, SBO = soybean oil, RB = refined and bleached, T = titer, ppm = parts per million.
can be compromised to improve another must be determined by the requirements of the intended food product. Hydrogenation has been the preferred method of modifying fats and oils in the United States, but the move to eliminate trans fatty acids has forced processors to use other modification techniques. Processing techniques, such as random and directed interesterification, fractionation, fully hydrogenated hardfats, cholesterol stripped animal fats, blending natural stable oils, and trait-enhanced oils can be utilized to formulate shortenings free of trans fatty acids. These techniques may be used singly or in combination to produce the desired results. Palm oil is a naturally stable oil, but it has an inherent problem that limits its use for some shortening products. It crystallizes slowly making it difficult to chill and package, and the product may become too hard and develop grainy crystal aggregates that contribute to undesirable organoleptic qualities. This condition, caused by the crystallization of the symmetrical SUS and SSS triglycerides and the presence of diglycerides, has limited the use of palm oil for all-purpose shortenings to about 25%. However, the rate of crystallization can be increased and the posthardening problem largely eliminated by interesterification.3,4 Lard and tallow usage for shortenings has declined due to the high cholesterol contents. A cholesterol stripping process has been developed to significantly reduce the cholesterol content, which would allow the use of the previous formulations.
Baking Shortenings
367
The use of tallow may be limited due to the trans fatty acids developed in the ruminant digestive system. Lard does not have a natural trans fatty acid content but does require interesterification to randomly rearrange the fatty acids to achieve a β′-crystal form. The high saturated fat content that exists with all fats and oils that are solid at ambient temperature (±75°F or 23.9°C) is another nutritional reformulation problem. The palm oil and high tallow formulations shown in Table 6.1 have saturated fatty acid contents of 50% or more; a level that exceeds the combined total of saturates and trans in most hydrogenated vegetable oil formulations. Nutritionally, trans should not be replaced with saturates, which is difficult because the trans fatty acids provided structure and stability like saturates even though they were viewed as unsaturated fatty acids. The high oleic, fatty acid, trait-enhanced oils are another option to replace hydrogenated basestocks. These oils can be used to limit saturated fatty acids while providing good oxidative stability. Trait-enhanced oils like higholeic sunflower and safflower oils, and possibly NuSun® and canola oils with high oleic and low saturated fatty acid contents, may be replacements for the 80- and 88-IV hydrogenated basestocks shown for the all-purpose shortening formulations in Table 6.1 with good oxidative stabilities. Oxidative stability concerns extend to the formation of trans fatty acids during the baking and frying processes. Controlled studies have shown that some of the cis unsaturated fatty acids are converted to trans during these food preparation processes.5,6 Interesterification has been utilized outside the United States to modify fats and oils instead of hydrogenation for quite some time and it appears that this process will become more popular to reduce or eliminate trans fatty acids in the United States. A basestock system can be implemented with the random interesterification of blends of oils, such as canola, cottonseed, soybean, sunflower, or palm with fully saturated hardfats of the same oils. Table 4.7 (in chapter 4) compares the particulars of most of these oils with soybean oil hardfat.7 A 50/50 blend of the soybean oil interesterified product with refined bleached (RB)-soybean oil produced SFI and melting characteristics like typical all-purpose shortenings.8 Traditional solids fat guidelines used for hydrogenated oils may not apply to interesterified oils. Comparable fats and oils products made from random interesterified oils have different solids to melting point relationships than those formulated with hydrogenated oils, that is, the dropping points have been found to be 2 to 4°C higher for interesterified than the hydrogenated products.9 Directed interesterification, another type of interesterification, is based on the principle of withdrawing one of the products during the reaction, for example, the trisaturated triglycerides (S3) formed during interesterification can be withdrawn from the reaction by crystallization. As the rearrangement proceeds toward completely random arrangement the melting point of the residual product is increased. Therefore, it is possible that directed interesterification can convert liquid oils with a substantial proportion of saturated fatty acids, like cottonseed or peanut oil, to plastic fats with a flat solids curve that provides the consistency of an all-purpose shortening without resorting to hydrogenation or blending with a hardfat.10 Fractionation is a separation process capable of producing basestocks free of trans fatty acids, suitable for shortening formulations; it separates the solid and
368
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
liquid triglycerides of a fat and oil on the basis of differences in melting characteristics. Utilization of either the olein (soft) or the stearin (hard) fractions depend on the source oil and the efficiency of the fractionation process. Fractionation invariably produces one fraction that is more desirable that the other. For example, the olein fraction of cottonseed and palm oils are the premium product while stearin has less value. Just the opposite is true of lauric oil fractions where stearin is the premium fraction. The nonpremium fractions have been successfully utilized in shortenings. Cottonseed oil stearin can be used as a basestock for all-purpose shortenings. Palm stearin, both as is and hydrogenated, can also be utilized for all-purpose shortening formulations. The lauric oil olein fraction has been blended with palm stearin to produce shortenings for mellorine, fillings, and icings.11 All-purpose shortenings are probably most used by retail and foodservice bakers for whom creaming properties, emulsification qualities, icing value, wide working range, water absorption, and stability in baked and fried foods are very important. In an all-purpose shortening, an attempt is made to obtain a balance of these properties so that it may be used with good results for any purpose. By varying composition and processing, it is possible to make a shortening that will be superior in any one respect, but it is impossible to produce one that will be excellent in all respects because some of the qualities are antagonistic to one another. For example, additives beneficial for a certain performance characteristic are usually detrimental for another: • Dimethylpolysiloxane performs as an antifoamer to extend frying stability, but it is detrimental to the baking characteristics of certain types of cakes and cookies. • Some antioxidants that retard oxidation to extend flavor stability have reactions with baking acids to give pink or purple colors. • Emulsifiers that make many beneficial contributions to baked products are especially detrimental to frying stability.
Shortening end users have to decide which type of compromise to make for the production of their particular products: use an all-purpose shortening that requires an inventory of only one shortening or use a series of specialty shortenings requiring more inventory? 6.3 EMULSIFIED ALL-PURPOSE SHORTENING A major advancement in shortening and baking technology occurred in the 1930s. Development and introduction of superglycerinated shortening brought about significant bakery product improvements. The addition of mono- and diglycerides to all-purpose shortenings allowed the production of high sugar and moisture cakes with improved volume and eating characteristics, a finer grain and texture, and an extended shelf life.12 The higher ratio of sugar and moisture to flour and other cake ingredients led to the application of the term High Ratio® for these shortenings. This shortening also provided the means for improving icings and fillings by providing additional aeration capabilities with higher moisture levels for increased volumes
Baking Shortenings
369
Table 6.2 Cake Formula Balance All-Purpose Shortening Cake Ingredient
Unemulsified
Emulsified
Sugar
no more than flour
exceeds flour up to 140% max.
Liquids
equal to flour
equal to or exceed sugar slightly
Shortening
no more than eggs
no more than eggs
with better emulsion stability. A dough conditioning and antistaling effect was also realized in yeast-raised products to improve dough handling properties and to extend the shelf life of these bakery products while softening the crumb, which improved the eating characteristics.13 Performance improvements were also found with many other bakery products where creaming properties, starch complexing, and emulsion stability properties were important. The addition of mono- and diglycerides to the high-ratio shortenings allowed these significant bakery product improvements. Functionality improvements over standard, unemulsified, all-purpose shortenings were attained in most areas, with the exception of applications where moisture retention, aeration, or protein modification are detrimental. For example, the use of this shortening type for frying results in excessive smoking, darkening, and foaming. Formulation changes were necessary for icings, yeast-raised products, and cakes most of all to realize the full advantage of the emulsified, all-purpose shortenings. Shortening developers who were seeking acceptance for the new shortening product identified the required changes. The most drastic changes were for cakes — bakers had to change their rules to balance cake formulas to accommodate the more efficient performance. The rules for balancing cake formulas with unemulsified, all-purpose shortenings are compared to the revised rules developed for emulsified, all-purpose shortenings in Table 6.2. Emulsified, all-purpose shortenings made cake mixing more efficient. The creaming method was almost universally used with unemulsified, all-purpose shortenings. This method required multistage mixing, starting with blending the shortening and sugar together to incorporate air into the shortening to form a cream. Second and third steps were then used to incorporate the liquids, flour, and other dry ingredients. The blending method introduced with emulsified, all-purpose shortenings was able to eliminate the creaming stage because of the efficiency of the emulsifier to trap air in the batter. All of the shortening and dry ingredients were blended with a portion of the liquid milk or water, and the eggs were added during the last mixing stage. Batter mixing times were reduced from 15 to 20 minutes for the creaming method to 9 to 12 minutes for the blending method. Formulation of the emulsified, all-purpose shortenings involved a determination of the amount and type of emulsifier to add to the existing all-purpose shortening formulations. The intermediate-hardness mono- and diglyceride chosen extended the multifunctional capabilities of the shortening. Optimum cake volume, moisture retention, structure, grain, and texture plus the yeast-raised product improvements are provided by emulsifiers prepared from fully saturated fats; however, icings and fillings
370
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
are smoothest and aerate more with monoglyceride products prepared from unhydrogenated oils. A compromise to facilitate performance for both cakes and icings is attained by using an emulsifier prepared from an intermediate-hardness hydrogenated oil or blend of meat fats: an IV range of 72 to 78 for most vegetable oils or an IV range of 55 to 60 for meat-fat bases. The α-monoglyceride levels (2.5 to 3.2%) used for emulsified, all-purpose shortenings were also chosen carefully to complement both cake and icing production. Icings and filling products require lower emulsification levels than do most cake products for optimum results. Therefore, the α-monoglyceride levels for emulsified, all-purpose shortenings will produce satisfactory results for most bakery products, but cannot provide superior results for any product. Shortening producers continually evaluate new, different, and improved emulsifiers to identify a superior cake and icing or all-purpose, emulsified shortening. Most emulsifiers follow the pattern of the mono- and diglycerides in that surfactant variations that improve cake functionality have a negative effect on icings and vice versa; however, some emulsifier systems have been developed that improve the all-purpose functionality over the performance of the intermediate mono- and diglyceride emulsifiers. These emulsifier systems incorporate the performance of a high-aerating surfactant, such as polysorbate 60, polyglycerol ester, or ethoxylated monoglycerides with the intermediate-hardness mono- and diglycerides used for the standard allpurpose, emulsified shortening and possibly a propylene glycol monoester (PGME), also of intermediate hardness. The aeration-producing surfactants are balanced with the structure and texture-building capabilities of the intermediate-hardness PGME and mono- and diglycerides for cake and icing types of products. These shortenings have been formulated to replace the standard emulsified, all-purpose shortenings pound for pound in most bakery formulations to improve volume, texture, and emulsion stability. Incorporation of mono- and diglycerides reduced the dependence of shortenings on the crystalline properties, solids-to-liquid ratios, and mixing procedures to develop creaming properties. Where nonemulsified, all-purpose shortenings relied on the base fats to contribute all functionality, the added emulsifiers enhanced these properties for greater functionality. Nevertheless, a wide plastic range provided by β′-crystal formulation, adequate solids-to-liquid ratios for a wide working range, and attention to plasticization procedures is still important for any general-purpose shortening. Temperature control during shipping, storage, and use has been improved considerably, but all-purpose shortenings must still have a wide plastic range to resist breakdown during mixing and make-up into the various bakery products. Shortenings that are brittle, lumpy, or sandy or have other textural problems that hinder proper incorporation into the baked products provide substandard, nonuniform baked items. 6.4 RETAIL CAKE MIX SHORTENINGS The prepared cake mix industry recognized that market expansion required mixes that provided ultraconvenient, foolproof performance to produce good-tasting
Baking Shortenings
371
moist cakes for consumption over an extended period after baking. These requirements have differentiated cake mix shortenings from bakery cake shortenings to create specialty or tailor-made products. Cake mix shortening requirements include a plasticity to meet the demands of the mix manufacturer’s compounding equipment, emulsification capable of batter aeration with a high moisture content, and oxidative stability for an extended package shelf life before preparation as well as tenderizing the cake crumb. Historically, the introduction of emulsified shortenings helped initiate the cake mix industry. Originally, and for an extended period of time, cake mixes utilized the same all-purpose shortenings developed for commercial bakery cakes. Although the sugar-to-flour ratio in prepared cakes ranges from 90 to 125%, it was recognized that these mixes not only required monoglycerides, but also performed better with higher levels than those used in bakery shortenings. It was also recognized that the conventional mono- and diglycerides used in the bakery all-purpose, emulsified shortenings, even when used at elevated levels, did not produce the required effect under the unique conditions imposed by the normal use of packaged retail mixes. It also soon became obvious that some types of mono- and diglycerides performed better than others. It was also observed that a shortening containing a particular type of monoglyceride might function satisfactorily with one flour in one manufacturer’s formulation, but not as efficiently in another situation. For a period of about 10 years, 1947 through 1957, a great number of specialty cake mix shortenings using variations in mono- and diglycerides, both as to base oil or fat source and as to hardness or degree of hydrogenation of the base oil or fat before glycerination, were used by various manufacturers. Each of these factors had some effect on the performance, and generally more desirable cake mix results were obtained with the use of mono- and diglycerides made with base fats of 30-IV or less or by blends of these with softer mono-and diglycerides at α-monoglyceride levels of 3.0 to 4.0% of the shortening. During this same 10-year period, there was a tremendous growth in prepared mix sales, and a healthy competition between companies developed with the goal to produce bigger and better cakes. Improvements in all ingredients and improved technology on the part of the manufacturers in compounding mixes helped in achieving the product image of a big, relatively fine-grained cake with good eating quality and containing as much moisture as possible. Dispersion of the shortening into the dry mix ingredients and tempering to maintain the optimum crystalline structure were compounding concerns solved by improved methods for extruding and plating shortenings into the dry mixes. The contribution of shortening toward achieving these improvement goals involved the judicious selection of available emulsifiers, usually monoglycerides and sometimes the sorbitan monostearates or polyoxyethylene derivatives. Efficient emulsifier systems permitted better batter aeration in stable emulsions where the increased air content carried over to improve the volume of baked cakes. Cake mix manufacturers also used higher package weights with correspondingly higher liquid requirements to achieve greater cake volumes. These product and processing improvements also allowed the introduction of a modified homemaker preparation requiring only a two-stage mixing procedure.
372
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
In the late 1950s and early 1960s, another major improvement for cake mixes occurred. Shortenings containing α-tending emulsifiers were developed and introduced to the cake mix industry. The first of these emulsifiers to be used was glyceryl lacto palmitate and later PGME. These emulsified shortenings led to improved fat dispersion and air incorporation. Although these emulsifiers are considered to be especially effective for aeration of cake batters, soluble protein has been found to be the key aerating ingredient, but stable emulsions are obtained only in those systems containing the α-tending emulsifiers.14 Introduction of PGME-emulsified shortenings allowed the development of a more convenient one-stage cake preparation process. The use of PGME shortenings in a one-stage cake mix produced layer cakes with a large volume, a very fine grain, moist eating qualities, and a flat crown. The use of emulsifiers to improve the performance of cake mixes did not stop with the introduction of PGME cake mix shortenings, but this emulsifier has continued to be a part of the emulsifier systems used in almost all cases. Synergistic emulsifier systems developed to further increase the moistness and improve the eating properties of the prepared-mix cakes while still retaining large cake volumes with fine grain and texture characteristics. The synergistic systems employed have been composed of polyglycerol esters or polysorbate 60, mono- and diglycerides, PGME, and lecithin. These emulsifier systems, along with other formulation improvements, have allowed a preparation method that increases the added moisture and adds liquid oil. Cakes made with liquid oil are more tender and appear more moist when eaten. The aerating and emulsifying potential of a mix shortening not only is determined by the emulsifier system, but is also governed by dispersibility. The technique used to compound the dry mix ingredients, the emulsifier system, and the consistency of the shortening replace the cake batter development bakers achieve with involved batter mixing procedures. Therefore, shortenings with high aerating and emulsifying potential can fail because of plasticity or dispersibility problems. The prepared mix industry prompted the development of tailor-made shortenings in respect to plasticity because of the different demands placed on the shortening by mix manufacturers’ compounding equipment. A typical dry mix process begins with the addition of plasticized shortening to a ribbon blender containing preblended dry ingredients followed by thorough mixing. After blending, the mix is moved to holding bins and then to the finisher. The finisher usually consists of a turbolizer, which is basically a hollow cylinder fitted with a shaft with high-speed mixing blades. Its function is the complete contact and plating of all the dry ingredients with the shortening to produce a uniform dry powder. After finishing, the dry mix may be stored in holding bins again before packaging.15,16 A shortening that is too hard is difficult to distribute throughout a mix unless special methods are used. A shortening that is too soft will tend to soak into the flour and cause filling and packaging problems. This condition allows the mix to pack and lump and tends to lead to bridging and tunneling of the mix in the surge bins with resultant conveying and packaging problems. Ultimately, shelf-stability problems caused by possible soakage of the fat into the packaging materials may even result. Performancewise, grease-soaked flour will not absorb moisture readily, and soft shortenings tend to be dispersed in the aqueous phase in spherical, rather than in irregular, form when
Baking Shortenings
373
the mix is made into batters. Cakes from such batters will exhibit a spherical and thickened cell-wall structure atypical of usual grain and textures. All things considered, the hardest shortening that provides the best performance and can be handled and distributed effectively by the mix manufacturer’s equipment is recommended. Normally, the special requirements in plasticity for tailor-made or specialty shortenings may be met by changing the proportions of hard to soft components of the basestock and hardstock blends; however, too much of a hardfat component can permit sudden crystallization and pelletizing when heated fats are dispersed in cake mixes. Therefore, the improved functional qualities of the highaerating cake mix shortenings are influenced by (1) the emulsifier system, (2) the specific fat formulation, (3) the amount of fat used in the mix, and (4) the method of incorporating the shortening into the prepared mix. Consumer desire for even more convenient preparation methods for cake mixes created a need for yet another cake mix shortening development. Cake mixes designed for baking in conventional ovens do not perform satisfactorily with microwave preparation. Experimentation revealed that microwave cakes require higher shortening and moisture contents. It was also determined that increased emulsification levels are necessary to retain moistness with microwave baking and that a different level is required for each cake variety (e.g., white, yellow, devil’s food).16 6.5 SPECIALTY BAKERY CAKE SHORTENINGS Attempts to use the same high-aerating plasticized shortenings developed for the cake mix industry in bakery cakes met with failure. The critical nature of the highaerating emulsifier system does not provide the tolerance necessary for the variations in formulas and conditions encountered in the many bakeries across the country. In addition, formula variations within a single bakery are so demanding that the materials will not function properly in existing formulations and with mixing procedures used with standard emulsified shortenings. Bakery cakes require extensive formula revisions and changes in mixing procedures to take advantage of the highaerating emulsifiers, and most bakers have found that these shortenings do not have the tolerance required even with changes in ingredients, formulations, and mixing procedures. It was necessary to broaden the tolerance of the shortening and still take advantage of the best characteristics of the individual emulsifiers, with synergistic combinations of the emulsifiers developed especially for the baking industry. The levels of the different types of emulsifiers must be carefully balanced to give optimum volume, symmetry, grain, eating characteristics, and moisture retention with tolerance levels that satisfy the requirements of the cake baker. Most bakery cakes prepared from “scratch” are baked with a plasticized, allpurpose, emulsified shortening. Most bakers have probably evaluated the more specialized cake shortenings, but have opted to continue with all-purpose shortenings to help reduce the number of shortening products inventoried. However, many retail and small wholesale cake bakeries may be using specialized cake shortenings incorporated in bakery cake mixes. The use of a prepared mix offers the small baker the
374
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
advantages of specialty ingredients while still allowing a manageable inventory. The specialized bakery cake mix shortenings require slightly different emulsifier systems than their retail counterparts. The major factors contributing to these differences are the mixing procedures employed and the desired finished cake characteristics. Bakery cake production requires lower emulsifier levels and less complex, slightly modified blends due to the mixing equipment and procedures employed. Mechanical emulsification provided by bakery cake mixers is much more efficient than for household mixers, and a less fragile cake is required to withstand the required handling while still maintaining desirable eating characteristics. 6.6 LIQUID CAKE SHORTENING Economic conditions and automation presented the need and emulsifier development provided the functionality to develop liquid cake shortening technology. Liquid cake shortenings combine the highly functional characteristics exhibited by plastic shortenings with the bulk handling characteristics of liquid oils. Liquid opaque shortenings are characterized by the presence of low levels of highly functional solids suspended in a liquid oil matrix. Liquid cake shortenings depend on the emulsifiers contained in them to provide most of the functionality necessary for cakes. A variety of emulsifiers, including glyceryl lacto esters, propylene glycol monoesters, and mono- and diglycerides, provide the aeration, tenderizing, and moisture retention properties of liquid cake shortenings. The viscosity of liquid shortening may be adjusted with a low-iodine-value hardfat. The type and level of solids are important contributors to a stable fluid dispersion. Unlike plastic solid shortenings, liquid shortenings must be formulated with β-tending hardfats. Large β-crystals provide a stable dispersion that resists a viscosity increase or gel when crystallized properly. β′-crystalline liquid shortenings can experience a viscosity rise that eventually thickens the product to a solid consistency. Equally important to proper formulation for fluidity are the processing conditions used to crystallize the liquid shortenings in the stable β-crystalline form. It is important to promote crystallization that is stable and in the proper concentration range for viscosity that is low enough for pumping, but high enough for adequate suspension stability. Process B for liquid shortening crystallization described in chapter 2 should provide acceptable results, but many other procedures have also been patented and used by different liquid shortening producers. The main objective is to produce a stable fluid nonseparating shortening that will not increase in viscosity. Processing techniques developed to suspend emulsifiers and possibly hardfats in a liquid oil base produced pumpable liquid shortenings at room temperature that accommodated bakery automation. Overall, the liquid shortenings were easier to handle and were more readily dispersed in cake batters, which enabled them to function more effectively as aerating agents. The ability of liquid cake shortening to entrap and maintain aeration produced cakes with greater volume and more even grain and texture with good eating quality, but the cakes were too tender to handle without formula modifications. The changes in rules for the cake-formula balance for liquid
Baking Shortenings
375
Table 6.3 Liquid Cake Shortening Cake Formula Balance Changes All-Purpose Plastic Shortening Cake Ingredient
Nonemulsified
Emulsified
Liquid Shortening
Shortening
base
increase
decrease
Sugar
base
increase
no change
Liquids
base
increase
increase
Leavening
base
increase
decrease
Mixing Time
base
increase
decrease
shortenings are compared to the two all-purpose plastic shortening requirements in Table 6.3. The cake-formulation changes indicated for liquid cake shortenings were necessary primarily because of the lower solids fat index at use temperatures and the increased aeration provided by the more efficient emulsifier systems. These shortening characteristics produced extreme cake tenderness, which was counteracted by the indicated cake-formula modifications. Mixing time reductions were due to the fluidity of the shortening, which rapidly mixes with both the dry and the wet ingredients in cake batters, and the more rapid aeration effect produced by the emulsifier systems with the increased moisture levels. Another prime consideration for liquid cake shortenings is the base oil and its oxidative stability. Base oils with high polyunsaturated fatty acids levels generally have a low oxidative stability as measured by AOM or oil stability index (OSI). Oxidation resistance can be improved by the addition of antioxidants, usually tertiary butylhydroquinone (TBHQ), or by the selection of a lightly hydrogenated oil product that is still fluid at room temperature. If a high stability is required and antioxidants are not permitted, high-stability base oils produced with fractionation process technology or genetic modification are alternatives for liquid shortenings. Most liquid cake shortenings utilize a partially hydrogenated vegetable basestock, usually soybean oil, with an iodine value of 100 to 109, but could utilize one of the hybrid high-oleic oils or a fractionated oil instead. The emulsifier systems utilized usually contain mono- and diglycerides with either glyceryl lacto esters or propylene glycol monoesters, In many cases, the emulsifier systems are designed for specific customers because liquid cake shortenings remain very specialized products, from the perspectives of both shortening processors and bakers. Oxidative resistance can be improved by the addition of antioxidants, usually TBHQ, or by the selection of a lightly hydrogenated oil product that is still fluid at room temperature. If a high stability is required and antioxidants are not permitted, high-stability base oils produced with fractionation process technology are another alternative for liquid shortenings. Most liquid cake shortenings utilize a partially hydrogenated vegetable basestock, usually soybean oil, with an iodine value of 100 to 109, but could utilize one of the hybrid high-oleic oils for a trans free formulation. The emulsifier systems utilized usually contain mono- and diglycerides with either glyceryl lacto esters or propylene glycol monoesters. In many cases, the emulsifier systems are designed for specific customers because liquid
376
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
cake shortenings remain very specialized products from the perspective of both shortening processors and bakers. 6.7 ICING AND FILLING SHORTENINGS Buttercream icings are sugar-based, relatively low-moisture (10 to 15%) confections used to provide protective coverings for cakes. Crème fillings are shelf stable, aerated confections used inside of cakes. Crème fillings are also sugar based, but are more highly aerated than buttercream icings and contain higher quantities of moisture (20 to 25%). These two bakery confectionery products are related to the extent that what is true functionally for crème fillings is true to a lesser extent for buttercream icings. The major desirable properties for crème fillings and icings include: • Yield: Aeration contributes to the eating qualities, lightness, and cost of the finished product. Buttercream icings are usually aerated to specific gravities of 0.75 to 0.80 grams per cubic centimeter (g/cc) or a volume of 125 to 135 cubic centimeters per 100 grams (cc/100g), whereas crème fillings are usually aerated to lower specific gravities of 0.45 to 0.50 g/cc or a volume of 200 to 250 cc/100g. The aeration potential of both products is a primary function of the shortening emulsifier system and its plasticity, which is controlled by the basestock formulation for solids-toliquid ratios, crystalline structure, and plasticization conditions. • Syneresis resistance: Whenever two materials with different water activities are placed in intimate contact with each other, moisture tends to migrate to the material with the lower water activity. Cakes either injected or filled with crème fillings or covered with buttercream icings become excellent candidates for syneresis. Shortenings with emulsification functionalities capable of holding the required moisture contents resist syneresis. Textural evaluations of the icing or filling can indicate emulsion stability; smoothness indicates a tight emulsion with a probable low water activity, whereas a curdled appearance indicates a loose emulsion with a probable high water activity. • Eating characteristics: Acceptable eating characteristics for icings and fillings are dependent upon three factors: • Smoothness: Confection sugars with large particle sizes or insufficient moisture levels may contribute graininess or a gritty sensation from undissolved sugars. • Getaway: Rapid melt in the mouth is the desired physical sensation, whereas a slow getaway will mask some of the desirable flavors. Getaway can be affected by (1) moisture level, (2) emulsion character (either tight or loose), (3) SFI slope and melting point of the shortening, and (4) degree of aeration. • Flavor: Offensive or off-flavors can be contributed by the shortening, due to either its basefat composition or its emulsifier components. Different emulsifiers are prepared with glycerin, propylene glycol, or sorbitol components that have bittersweet flavors that can be detected but at levels usually above use levels. Any shortening off-flavors would probably assume the flavor of the oil product before processing or a reverted flavor. • Heat stability: Icings and fillings must be resistant to temperature abuses to which the finished product will be subjected in normal circumstances. Structure for an
Baking Shortenings
377
icing or filling is provided by the shortening and affected by both the base oil selection and processing. The base fat melting point must be high enough to resist melting at the temperature conditions expected before the finished product is consumed. Heat stability may be built into the shortening by the choice of basestocks and hardfats for the base shortening and the emulsifier system. • Body: A somewhat firm but spreadable consistency without undue drag is necessary for a smooth icing application to cakes. Likewise, crème fillers need a somewhat firm, but not stiff, body to stand up between the cake layers or injection into cakes. Filling and icing structure is affected by the shortening’s consistency and emulsifier system of the shortening.
A wide range of formulations is available and in use for crème fillings and buttercream icings. The shortenings chosen to prepare these products are considerably varied. Butter, margarine, and all-purpose shortenings are used for icing production, but the largest usage since the early 1930s has been that of all-purpose emulsified shortenings and, more recently, the shortenings developed especially for icing and crème filling production. The cake and icing or High Ratio type of shortenings utilize plastic or shortening-like mono- and diglycerides at a compromised level to produce satisfactory cakes, icings, fillings, yeast-raised products, and other products. It has also been recognized that mono- and diglycerides alone do not provide all the performance desired regarding icing and filling volume and stability. Specialty shortenings combining proper fat structure with emulsifier systems composed of hydrophilic and lipophilic components have proven to be advantageous. Icings and fillings made with these shortenings aerate rapidly for high volumes, with superior eating qualities contributed by a rapid getaway in the mouth to eliminate the lingering greasy eating characteristics formerly associated with bakery icings and fillings. The effects of the individual components of the specialty icing and filling shortenings include:17-19 • Shortening-base composition: The shortening bases selected for most specialty icing and filling shortenings are characteristic of basestock and hardfat selections for all-purpose shortenings. Hardfat helps produce a flat SFI slope for a broad plastic range and firmness for icing and filling structure; however, excessive hardfat additions result in a loss of shortening plasticity that leads to more difficult incorporation, along with less getaway in icing and filling. Softer hardfats (e.g., 25- to 30-IV hydrogenated cottonseed oil) may be selected to allow slightly higher addition levels than are possible with low-iodine-value (4.0 or less) hardfats. The β′-hardfat levels utilized to produce the most heat-stable fillings and icings range from 15 to 20%. • Emulsifier system: Extensive testing has verified that mono- and diglyceride emulsifiers alone do not provide all of the icing and filling requirements for aeration, structure, and stability. A synergistic system composed of lipophilic (fat-loving) and hydrophilic (water-loving) emulsifiers has produced icings and fillings greater specific volumes, superior eating qualities, and tight, stable emulsions. The emulsifier system components are: • Lipophilic emulsifiers: Many icing and filling shortenings utilize two waterin-oil surfactants in synergistic emulsifier systems: mono- and diglyceride
378
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
and lecithin. Lecithin, a natural emulsifier, provides fluidity and emulsion stability. Low levels of soft mono- and diglycerides produced from unhydrogenated or relatively high-iodine-value (90 or less) basestock provides the best performance in icings and fillings; levels higher than 2.5% α-monoglycerides decrease icing and filling stability.20 Shortenings containing low-iodine-value mono- and diglycerides produce very tight emulsions that restrict aeration at all addition levels. • Hydrophilic emulsifiers: Polyglycerol esters of oleic acid or 80- to 85-IV shortening basestock, as well as polysorbate 60 or 80, are particularly good aeration promoters in icings and fillings. These hydrophilic emulsifiers also provide emulsion stability to prevent oil migration from the icing or filling to the cake.
Effective icing and filling shortenings are the result of combining a firm wide plastic range base with a synergistic emulsifier system. Still, specialty icing and filling shortenings vary with each producer, plus variations arise for individual customer requirements; an average all-vegetable formulation consists of 15 to 20% β′-hardfat, soft mono- and diglycerides of 1.0 to 1.5%, and fluid-grade lecithin at approximately 0.25%, with either 1.5 to 2.0% of a soft polyglycerol ester or 0.4 to 0.75% polysorbate 60. The balance of the formulation is composed of an 80- to 88-IV basestock. Meatfat formulations utilize the same emulsifier systems with equivalent hardfat levels with interesterified lard, but lower hardfat levels (10 to 12%) when a blend of tallow and soft hydrogenated soybean or cottonseed oil is utilized as the base fat. 6.8 ICING STABILIZERS Flat icings, frostings, and glazes constitute a large group of bakery accessories for baked or fried products. This is the simplest type of icing and consists essentially of powdered sugar with enough water added to give a consistency suited to the application. These icings may be pourable or plastic and are commonly used on donuts, sweet rolls, Danish pastries, breads, petit four cakes, other specialty cakes, etc. Because of moisture loss, water icings can become dull and hard so they flake off of the product in a very short time. Also, when packaged for distribution, the icings or glazes can stick to the wrapping material and fingerprint easily. Low-level additions of a properly processed icing stabilizer provide elasticity and antisticking properties and cause more rapid setting properties that resist fingerprints. The solids slope the icing stabilizer helps effect the desired icing or glaze set while still retaining elasticity to prevent brittleness and flaking off of the baked or fried product. Typically, icing stabilizers have been hydrogenated with melting points centered at 113, 117, and 125°F (45, 47, and 52°C), but a flat solids slope can also be provided by the directed interesterification process to produce trans-free stabilizers. Icing stabilizers are formulated with and without lecithin depending on the desired fluidity in the finished icing or glaze. Fluidity of an icing is increased with lecithin additions up to 0.5%, but this functionality reverses at higher levels.
Baking Shortenings
379
Table 6.4 Icing Stabilizers — Typical SFI and Melting Point Analysis Mettler Dropping Point °F
113.0
117.0
125.0
°C
45.0
47.0
52.0
10.0°C/50°F
67.0
65.0
77.0e
21.1°C/70°F
58.0
60.0
74.0e
26.7°C/80°F
53.0
58.0
72.0e
33.3°C/92°F
38.0
45.0
71.0e
37.8°C/100°F
21.0
30.0
58.0e
Solids Fat Index
Note:
e = estimate only; product too hard to perform SFI analysis.
The typical target SFI limits corresponding to the three melting points employed for icing stabilizers are shown in Table 6.4 Icing stabilizers are flaked to permit ease in handling, scaling, and rapid melting during the icing and glaze make-up. Typically, 1 to 6% of the icing stabilizer is melted and slowly added to the icing or glaze while mixing to prevent solidification of the stabilizer before it is incorporated into the mix. Flaked icing stabilizers are produced on chill rolls that solidify the product into the thin flake form to provide a large surface area that promotes rapid melting when the flakes are heated for use in the finished icings or glazes. 6.9 BREAD SHORTENING On the basis of usage level, shortening is one of the minor ingredients in the production of white bread. Functionally, however, it is one of the more important ingredients, as it influences dough mixing, handling, proofing, and bread volume, in addition to imparting desirable eating and keeping qualities to the baked bread. All of these effects are due to the lubricating properties of the shortening. An adequate shortening level must be used to produce bread with a good appearance and eating qualities. The optimum shortening level may vary slightly from one bakery to another due to variations in mixing, proofing conditions, and flour quality; however, most bread formulations will contain about 3.0% (100% flour basis) shortening for a good-quality loaf of bread. For many years, prime steam lard was considered the ultimate in bread shortening. Then, the addition of mono- and diglycerides changed the concept of bread from a firm chewy type to a soft compressible product. Emulsified shortenings or separate additions of the mono- and diglycerides enabled the production of a soft bread that remained soft for long periods of time both on the grocery store shelf and in the home. The homemaker’s “squeeze test” became a quality control measure for freshness observed by bakers and ingredient suppliers. Sensory evaluations to determine
380
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 6.5 Yeast-Raised Products Softeners and Dough Strengtheners Allowed Surfactant
Dough
Use Level,
Softener
Strengtheners
% Flour Basis
Mono-and Diglycerides: Saturated Type
Good+
Slight
GMP
Unsaturated Type
Slight
Slight
GMP
Lecithin
Good
Slight
GMP
Diacetyl Tartaric Acid Esters
Good
Good
GMP
Propylene Glycol Mono Esters
Good+
Slight
GMP
Sodium Stearoyl-2-Lactylate
Slight
Good
0.5 max
Calcium Stearoyl-2-Lactylate
Slight
Good
0.5 max
Succinylated Monoglycerides
Good
Good
0.5 max
Ethoxylated Monoglycerides
Slight
Good
0.5 max
Polysorbate 60
Slight
Good
0.5 max
Sodium Stearyl Fumarate
Good
Good
0.5 max
Lactylic Stearate
Slight
Good
0.5 max
Note: GMP = good manufacturing practice, max = maximum.
bread staleness correlate well with this simple firmness measurement. The successes of mono- and diglycerides prompted the development of other surfactants. Emulsifier concentrates emerged that permitted a somewhat greater flexibility in the production of bread of varying degrees of softness, improved handling properties, and greater tolerance to flour variations. Concerns that some surfactants could present a health hazard and that the increased bread softness created might be a deceptive practice led, in 1952, to limitations being placed on the emulsifiers allowed and use levels permitted by the standard of identity for bread and rolls. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) standards limited the amount of approved surfactants to about 0.5% based on the flour weight. In 1978, the standard of identity for bread, rolls, and buns was amended to remove the use limit for mono- and diglycerides, diacetyl tartaric acid esters of monoglycerides (DATEM), propylene glycol monoesters (PGME), and other ingredients that performed a similar function. The FDA-approved softeners and dough strengtheners for yeast-raised products are listed in Table 6.5 with the use-level restrictions and functional effects. For conventional bread production, most plastic shortenings of either animal or vegetable origin supplemented with softeners and conditioners may be used effectively; however, vegetable oils are now preferred because of nutritional concerns regarding cholesterol, trans, essential and saturated fatty acids. In the continuous bread-mixing process, introduced in the 1950s, oils, shortening, and emulsifiers continue to provide the same benefits as for the conventional process. Continuous bread shortenings have three basic components that can be produced together or added separately:
Baking Shortenings
381
• Base shortening: Almost any fat or oil can be used successfully for the base shortening component for continuous bread production. Both hydrogenated and unhardened meat fats or vegetable oils have been used successfully. Comparisons between fat types have shown that the quality of bread is unaffected by the type of fat used, except that a salad oil with an absence of solids at room temperature provides the greatest softening effect, which requires a higher flake or hardfat addition level for bread structure. • Flakes: The higher mixing and proofing temperatures employed for continuous bread processing require higher melting shortenings for gas retention and structure. A minimum amount of the shortening must be present as a solid at the dough proofing temperature. Hardfat or stearin flakes made from all the available edible fats and oils are adequate to provide solids in the 104 to 115°F (40 to 48.9°C) proofing temperature range normally used for continuously mixed bread dough. • Emulsifier systems: Numerous evaluations have confirmed that hard, highly saturated mono- and diglycerides, with a 5.0 maximum iodine value, are superior to softer mono-and diglycerides for starch complexing for shelf-life enhancement, dough strength, and bread texture. The softer mono- and diglycerides have been shown to contribute to a weaker dough that allows fermentation gases to escape, resulting in bread with open grain, poor texture, and reduced volume. In addition, one or more of the softeners or dough conditioners listed in Table 6.5 may be utilized.
Most of the fat-soluble surfactants that are the most effective have high melting points, and the hardfats must be melted into the shortening before addition to the continuous dough operation. Most continuous operations either use separate components or purchase liquid shortenings processed with the three components for use at room temperature. 6.10 LIQUID BREAD SHORTENINGS Continuous dough process requirements for a fat system composed of three components (base fat, hardfat flakes, and emulsifiers) presented uniformity problems that affected bread quality. Hardfat additions increase the melting point of the fat system as desired for dough structure and gas retention; however, merely adding a predetermined amount of flakes does not eliminate the opportunity for uniformity problems. An improper balance of hardfat and surfactants results in an increase of cripples caused by handling while transferring the proofed bread to the oven. Experimental work has indicated that the SFI values should be in the 10 to 15% range at the high temperatures encountered in the development and processing stages for continuous doughs. Solids control of the fat system is a better control primarily due to the variability of the base fats; however, most bread bakers do not have the facilities to perform the SFI or SFC analysis. These control requirements, plus the convenience of handling a shortening without heating, made liquid bread shortenings attractive for the bread baker. Liquid bread shortenings have the same general definition as the other fluid products: a stable dispersion of crystalline solids in a liquid oil matrix that is fluid and pumpable at room temperature. Liquid shortenings designed for bread production
382
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 6.6 Liquid Bread Shortening Evolution Surfactant
None
Softener
Softener and Conditioner
5-IV Mono- and Diglycerides: Alpha monoglycerides, %
None
3.0±
Dough Conditioner:
None
None
2.5±
5.75±
4.0±
Polysorbate 60, %
—
—
2.0±
—
—
Ethoxylated mono- and diglyceride, %
—
—
—
5.0±
—
Sodium stearyl-2-lactylate, %
—
—
—
—
4.9±
Mettler Dropping Point, % °C
50.0±
53.9±
54.4±
53.3±
40.6±
°F
122.0±
129.0±
130.0±
120.0±
105.0±
Solids Fat Index 10.0°C/50°F
13.0±
11.0±
11.0±
8.5±
6.5±
21.1°C/70°F
12.5±
10.0±
10.0±
7.5±
3.0±
26.7°C/80°F
12.0±
10.0±
10.0±
7.5±
2.5±
33.3°C/92°F
11.0±
10.0±
10.0±
7.5±
2.0±
40.0°C/104°F
10.0±
6.5±
9.5±
4.5±
1.5±
43.3°C/110°F
—
5.0±
9.0±
3.0±
—
AOM stability, hours
30.0±
25.0±
20.0±
30.0±
20.0±
Antioxidant
None
None
None
TBHQ
TBHQ
Notes: IV = iodine value, AOM = active oxygen method, TBHQ = tertiary butylhydroquinone.
are normally composed of a liquid vegetable oil base, a high-melting-point hardfat, and a crumb softening agent, either alone or in combination with a dough conditioner. Softener and dough-strengthener additives to the liquid shortening complete the system and offer a high degree of uniformity to the bread baker, in addition to eliminating another ingredient to inventory and scale. A review of the evolution of liquid bread shortening is shown in Table 6.6.21,22 The first liquid bread shortening, introduced in the early 1960s, had an opaque or milky appearance and was composed of a liquid soybean oil, partially hydrogenated for oxidative stability with the hardfat requirement for continuous bread processing. Later, mono- and diglycerides made from a low-iodine-value hardfat were incorporated to soften the bread crumb. The softening effect results from an interaction of amylose, the linear starch component, with the fatty acid chain of the monoglyceride, which subsequently reduces the starch tendency to retrograde. Polysorbate 60 was probably the first dough conditioner added to liquid bread shortenings. The function of a dough conditioner is to modify the rheological characteristics of the bread dough to strengthen it for better handling characteristics. All of the liquid bread shortenings up to this point had high hardfat levels, as indicated by the SFI levels of the first three shortenings shown in Table 6.6. The high levels of hardfat were required in the continuous mixing process for good bread sidewall strength. This function was partially assumed by the conditioner with the addition of ethoxylated mono- and diglycerides,
Baking Shortenings
383
which allowed a hardfat reduction for improved softness of the bread loaf. The last variation shown for liquid bread shortenings is a conditioner modification of a blend of ethoxylated mono- and diglycerides (EMG) with sodium stearoyl lactylate (SSL) that stills retains mono- and diglycerides as a crumb softener. This conditioner change was made to strengthen the gluten structure, to attain a better mixing tolerance for the dough, and to promote increased moisture absorption, which extended crumb softness and shelf life and increased loaf volume. The synergistic effect of combining the surfactants and hardfats with the liquid oil carrier, which also acts as a lubricant, has permitted some bakers to reduce their usage levels by 15 to 20% over the addition of the same composition added separately. Nevertheless, some bread bakers still prefer to formulate and add their own softeners and conditioners to a liquid shortening similar to the original nonemulsified product. 6.11 SWEET YEAST-RAISED DOUGH SHORTENINGS Sweet doughs are yeast-leavened, but distinguished from bread, buns, and dinner rolls by a sweeter taste and a richer eating sensation. Sweet doughs are much richer in shortening, milk, and sugar than the bread doughs and usually contain eggs. The function of these ingredients is to soften the texture and make the product flakier, improve the taste and color, and increase the nutritional quality of the product. Improvements in sweet doughs came about as an outgrowth of the use of monoand diglycerides in cake batters. It was a natural step to enrich sweet doughs by the use of a high-ratio shortening containing an emulsifier to aid in a greater absorption of the liquids, thus yielding softer, moister, longer keeping products. This advance occurred in the late 1930s. Eventually, the emulsifier content was raised to higher levels in special sweet dough shortenings to further enhance these properties, making possible the tender, rich, sweet rolls, coffee cakes, and yeast-raised donuts with the relatively long shelf life produced today. Shortening bases with low SFI contents are preferred to give tenderness to the yeast-raised shortenings. The best surfactants are the softeners that have the greatest effect on the amylose component of the starch, hence, hard mono- and diglycerides are typically used in sweet dough shortenings at levels that provide between 8.0 and 9.0% α-monoglyceride contents. These shortenings can be produced with either meat fats or all-vegetable shortening bases, which act as carriers for the hard emulsifiers and provide lubricity. Typically, a meat-fat shortening would be composed of lard with 20% of low iodine value, tallow-based mono- and diglyceride to produce a plasticized shortening with an 8.5 ± 0.5% α-monoglyceride content. An all-vegetable product could be a plasticized blend of 80% of an 80-IV hydrogenated, deodorized soybean oil basestock with 20% low iodine value, soybean oil-based mono- and diglyceride, also with a 8.5 ± 0.5% α-monoglyceride content. The interesterified soybean oil basestock identified in Table 4.7 (chapter 4) could be blended with soybean oil to replace the hydrogenated basestock for a trans free formulation. A blend of palm oil and a liquid vegetable oil should also be an adequate replacement for the partially hydrogenated basestock.
384
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
6.12 COOKIE SHORTENINGS The formulas for some types of cookies are very similar to those for layer cakes, except for a lower moisture content, which may have influenced the dictionary definition for cookies (i.e., “a small sweet cake, usually flat”). The term cookie actually covers a wide variety of bakery products. Hundreds of types of cookies are made by various branches of the baking industry. Cookies may be classified into hand cut, bag type, dropped, ice box, wire cut, Dutch machine type, English hard goods, American stamped type, and many others too numerous to list. However, two broad general classifications can be made: hard and soft. Cookie varieties contain from 10 to 30% shortening, so shortening is definitely an essential component for most cookie formulations. The type and amount of shortening utilized affect the machine response of the cookie dough and the quality of the baked cookie. Shortening is a principal ingredient responsible for tenderness, keeping qualities, grain, and texture, and it adds a rich quality to cookies. It must provide the proper solids contents for cohesion and spread yet still be a tenderizer. In soft-cookie production, plastic shortening is creamed with sugar to incorporate air bubbles that are trapped in the liquid phase of the shortening. High SFI shortenings do not have enough oil volume for adequate aeration, and low SFI shortenings do not have the ability to hold the air until mixing is complete. Also, cookie shortenings must have controlled plasticity or an ability to be worked into the blend during mixing to provide a smooth, lump-free cookie dough with a minimum of oiling out. Pockets of shortening in a cookie dough will melt and leave voids and uneven areas in baked cookies. Low heat-stability shortenings break down with machining to release liquid oil and cause distorted greasy cookies; however, some oiling is necessary for wire-cut, rotarymolded, and other cookie processes for extrusion or release. It is necessary to maintain a balance between the solid and liquid phases of the shortening for machinability, aeration, tenderness, and shelf life functions. All-purpose shortenings with wide plastic ranges, a β′-crystal habit, and good heat stability are normally adequate for soft-cookie production. Emulsified shortenings produce soft cookies with a gummy mouth feel because of the increased moisture retention after baking. Normally, this effect has been viewed as undesirable, but it has been the basis for a soft cookie category. Hard cookies merely require lubrication from the shortening component. The low moisture content of these cookies causes the sugar to solidify to a candy-like mass instead of a liquid or mobile syrup as in cakes with higher moisture levels. The shortening function is to disrupt the continuity of the caramelized sugar mass.23 Usually, a shortening with a narrow plastic range is preferred for hard cookies for lubricity, shelf life, and enhancement of the eating character. 6.13 COOKIE FILLER SHORTENINGS Filler is the name given to the crème or filling between two cookie pieces that form a sandwich cookie or a sugar wafer. All cookie fillers have the same basic ingredients — in order of prominence, sugar, shortening, salt, flavor, and lecithin.
Baking Shortenings
385
Anhydrous corn sugar and powdered sugar are the sweeteners used because they melt rapidly in the mouth. Powdered sugar imparts a warming sensation, whereas corn sugar gives a cooling sensation. The filler consistency and eating character are determined to a large extent by the shortening used. The requisites for a good sandwich cookie or wafer filler shortening have been identified as: • Quick getaway in the mouth. • Oxidative stability capable of providing 6 to 12 months of filler shelf life. • Effect a filler consistency that does not become sandy, hard, or disappear with age or normal heat abuse. • Aeration potential of 0.75 to 0.95 g/cc specific gravity in most fillers within approximately 10 to 15 minutes mixing time (Note: see Method 8.12, Sandwich Cookie Filler Shortening Evaluation, in chapter 3). • Produce a tacky filler consistency that will still break or shear at depositor operating temperatures (usually ±90°F or ±32.2°C).
Cookie bakers have essentially five different options for their filler shortening requirements:
1. Coconut oil: Unhardened coconut oil with a 76°F (24.4°C) melting point imparts a cool, pleasant sensation in the mouth, but is seldom used because it will melt and separate from the filler with only moderate heat. Hydrogenated coconut oil with a 92°F (33.3°C) melting point provides an excellent eating quality with fair aeration, but the heat generated in many filling machines will cause unacceptable filler oil-out. Use of a hydrogenated coconut oil with a domestic oil hardfat added to adjust the melting point to about 110°F (43.3°C) usually eliminates the depositing problems, but the cookie filler eating quality suffers due to the high melting characteristics. 2. Coconut oil blends: Plasticized blends of coconut oil with other natural or modified oils to obtain an 82 to 94°F (27.8 to 34.4°C) melting point produce acceptable eating quality fillers; however, increased production rates for the sandwich cookie machines result in oil-out problems. Reformulation of these blends to higher melting points helps obtain maximum production efficiencies while retaining some of the sharp melting characteristics obtained from the reduced coconut oil levels. 3. Domestic oil blends: Many sandwich cookie filler shortenings are produced with a blend of hydrogenated domestic vegetable oils (e.g., soybean, cottonseed). The melting points generally range from 98 to 112°F (36.7 to 44.4°C), depending in part on the type of filler-depositing equipment in use. The oils are selectively hydrogenated or otherwise modified to produce as steep an SFI slope as possible to provide good eating qualities and oxidative stability. 4. Animal/vegetable blends: These cookie filler shortenings have been attractive to low-priced cookie producers. The flavor and creaming properties of these blends are acceptable, but the mouth feel and getaway are usually poor in comparison with the other products. 5. Specially hydrogenated domestic oil shortening: Special hydrogenation utilizing a sulfur-proportioned nickel catalyst produces a hardened soybean and cottonseed oil shortening with characteristics like hydrogenated coconut oil (e.g., a steep SFI slope with a sharp melting point). Cookie fillers produced with these specially
386
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 6.7 Cookie Filler Shortenings Coconut Oil
Coconut &
All
Animal Fat
Domestic
Domestic
Vegetable
Selective
Composition, %
76°F
92°F
110°F
Oil Blend
Oil Blend
Oil Blend
H-SBO
Coconut oil
100
—
—
69
—
—
—
5-IV H-CNO
—
100
—
—
—
—
—
Probable
1-IV H-CNO
—
—
98
—
—
—
—
66-IV H-SBO
—
—
—
25
—
—
— —
74-IV H-SBO
—
—
—
—
75
—
80-IV H-SBO
—
—
—
—
20
75
—
60-T CSO
—
—
2
6
2
—
—
Tallow
—
—
—
—
—
25
—
75-IV SH-SBO
—
—
—
—
—
—
100
10.0°C/50°F
59±
57±
63±
53±
39±
27±
58±
21.1°C/70°F
29±
33±
41±
24±
24±
15±
43±
26.7°C/80°F
0
8±
16±
14±
17±
12±
34±
33.3°C/92°F
—
3±
7±
8±
7±
6±
12±
40.0°C/104°F
—
—
4±
4±
3±
1±
1±
Mettler Dropping Point, °C
24.5±
34±
43.5±
45±
40.5±
39±
38.5±
AOM Stability, hours
200+
200+
200+
200±
100+
75+
200+
Solids Fat Index
Nutritional Calculations: Trans fatty acids, % Saturated fatty acids, % Cholesterol, ppm
—
—
—
11.4
38.6
20.2
60.0
92.1
96.2
99.1
76.0
19.7
26.1
18.0
—
—
—
—
—
275
—
Notes: IV = iodine value, H = Hydrogenated, CNO = coconut oil, SBO = soybean oil, CSO = cottonseed oil, SH = selectively hydrogenated, AOM = activity oxygen method.
hydrogenated products with a 102°F (38.9°C) melting point have a good getaway in the mouth with acceptable performance and exceptional oxidative stability, but unfortunately have a high trans fatty acid content.
Typical compositions, SFI profiles, and melting point analyses are listed in Table 6.7 for five cookie filler shortening options. 6.14 PIE CRUST SHORTENINGS Pie crusts are low in moisture and high in shortening. The ratio of ingredients teamed with the preparation method prevents the formation of a continuous gluten network through the dough and results in a baked product that is flaky. A porous crust structure is not desired because pie crusts must support and retain fillings of moderate viscosity without leakage and retain high moisture contents. Pie crusts are generally divided into three classes on the basis of flakiness:
Baking Shortenings
387
1. Flaky: When broken, flaky crusts exhibit a fracture along different lines at different levels and show a distinct separation in layers parallel to the surface. Producing long flake crusts requires a minimum of mixing with a high shortening content to maintain the desired texture. 2. Mealy: When broken, mealy crusts break in a straight line and have a surface resembling a cookie. Mealy crusts are usually mixed more thoroughly to allow rougher handling both in make-up and distribution. 3. Medium flake: Short or medium pie crusts have properties between flaky and mealy. The shortening particles are purposely left about the size of a pea and the moisture is incorporated with a minimum of mixing to keep the shortening particles discrete.
Nearly all of the shortening functions in pie crust are associated with its capacity to lubricate, tenderize, and provide flakiness. Lard qualifies as an ideal pie crust shortening because its solid components are primarily symmetrical in configuration and do not set up in a tight-knit matrix. Flakiness is imparted by the high-melting, coarse, large, β-crystals that form grains and by the liquid oil, which separates the dough into layers. Lard, the standard pie crust shortening, has an SFI profile suitable for flakiness and lowtemperature plasticity due to its β-crystalline habit. Most pie lard shortenings are developed around the addition of 2 to 3% low-iodine-value lard hardfat for consistency control. The fatty acid composition and resulting consistency of lard receipts can vary widely because of the effects of diet, climate, and position on the animal’s body. Hardfat additions increase the SFI values most at the higher temperatures, with a lesser effect being observed at lower temperatures, as evidenced by a flatter SFI slope. Lard can also be partially hydrogenated for consistency control. Hydrogenated lard essentially maintains the original SFI slope with gradual increases across the entire SFI profile. Consistency control of pie lard is also achieved through the plasticization and tempering conditions used. Tempering packaged lard at 70 to 80°F (21.1 to 26.7°C) produces a plastic, rubbery consistency, whereas product tempered at 40°F (4.4°C) is loosely structured and brittle.24 The procedures used in preparing pie crusts have been developed around the peculiar characteristics of lard. Use of identical procedures with the standard all-purpose shortenings formulated for a wide plastic range and a β′-crystalline structure results in substandard pie crusts. It is necessary to mix the pie dough at colder temperatures and use it immediately for the standard all-purpose shortenings to perform successfully; however, all-vegetable shortenings formulated to the β-crystalline structure provide pie doughs equivalent in performance, but with a bland flavor instead of the lardy flavor typical of the lard products. Table 6.8 compares the composition, SFI, and melting characteristics of the lard products to all-purpose shortenings prepared with soybean oil. Either the soybean or canola oil interesterified basestocks, shown in Table 4.7 (chapter 4) could be blended with a liquid oil and possibly adjusted with hardfat to meet the pie crust requirements for a vegetable oil shortening free of trans fatty acids. 6.15 BISCUIT SHORTENINGS Biscuit means one thing in the United States and another in the British Isles and Europe. The word is French (meaning “twice cooked”) and originally applied
388
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 6.8 Pie Crust Shortenings Basestock, % Lard
Lard
Soybean Oil
100
—
97
—
—
H-Lard
—
100
—
—
—
59-T Lard
—
—
3
—
—
95-IV H-SBO
—
—
—
95
—
88-IV H-SBO
—
—
—
—
60
60-IV H-SBO
—
—
—
—
40
63-T SBO
—
—
—
5
—
29.0±
35.5±
32.0±
25.0±
34.0±
Solids fat index 10.0°C/50°F 21.1°C/70°F
21.5±
26.0±
25.0±
15.0±
25.5±
26.7°C/80°F
15.0±
19.5±
18.0±
13.0±
22.5±
33.3°C/92°F
4.5±
10.0±
10.0±
10.0±
13.5±
40.0°C/104°F
2.0±
7.0±
7.0±
7.5±
4.5±
Mettler dropping point, °C
32.5±
38.0±
41.0±
45.0±
42.0±
Crystal habit
beta
beta
beta
beta
beta
Nutritional Calculations: nil
5.0±
nil
21.4
30.7
Saturated fatty acids, %
Trans fatty acids, %
41.9
42.9
43.6
19.7
18.1
Cholesterol, ppm
3500
3500
3500
—
—
Notes: H = hydrogenated, T = titer, IV = iodine value, SBO = soybean oil, CSO = cottonseed oil, ppm = parts per million.
to thin, flat breads used on shipboard. These breads had to be baked twice to expel as much moisture as possible to increase their keeping qualities. This description certainly does not fit the U.S. biscuit developed by American colonists in the late eighteenth century. American biscuits are better described as “quick breads” made with baking powder, instead of yeast or baking soda, in combination with buttermilk as the acid ingredient for leavening. Biscuits, long a staple of the diet in the southern states, has become a favorite nationwide. American consumers can prepare biscuits from scratch or from a dry mix, bake refrigerated biscuits from a can, purchase them as a bakery item, or order them at fast food or fullservice restaurants. Biscuit doughs cannot withstand the handling that yeast-raised doughs require to develop the flour gluten or protein. Biscuits are mixed by first cutting the shortening into the flour until it forms walnut- to pea-sized pieces to ensure that the flour is not “greased” followed by the moisture addition and minimal mixing to only wet the flour without excessive gluten development. The mixing time is dependent on the physical consistency of the shortening. A soft, plastic shortening will incorporate into the mix rapidly to develop the dough and produce a tough biscuit. A firm, brittle
Baking Shortenings
389
shortening will shatter in small pieces that do not incorporate into the dough easily and thus produce a flaky light biscuit when baked. Many biscuit bakers refrigerate their shortenings to help assure that the biscuit doughs are not overmixed. Firm hydrogenated vegetable oil blends or antioxidant-treated tallow with a relatively high oxidative stability are often tailor-made for individual food processors or foodservice operations for biscuit manufacture. Because plasticity is not a desired attribute for biscuit shortenings, blends with steep SFI slopes and good oxidative stability are preferred; they should be of a consistency only soft enough to handle conveniently. Crystal structure is not critical, except that a β-crystal shortening with a grainy texture probably provides a flakier biscuit. 6.16 DANISH PASTRY ROLL-IN SHORTENINGS Danish pastry was first introduced to the United States around the turn of the last century. Danish pastry is a rich, yeast-leavened sweet dough that has a high fat content. The distinguishing feature of Danish preparation is the interleaving of dough sheets with layers of shortening that, upon baking, result in a separation of strata and an open network of crisp and flaky layers. Initially, the pastry was produced using a hard, imported Danish butter, and the product was closer to puff pastry than the Danish production we know today. The character of Danish pastry has gradually changed — first, by the substitution of domestic butter, then margarine, and eventually specialty shortenings. The current Danish pastry still has good flakiness, but is also tender or short.25 The steps for the hand make-up production of Danish pastry are as follows: • A sweet yeast-raised dough is prepared in the usual manner except that mixing ceases as soon as the ingredients have been thoroughly incorporated. Danish doughs are further developed during the rolling-in process. • The dough is immediately divided into strips of an appropriate size and then allowed to rest for 15 to 20 minutes in a retarder at 35 to 40°F (1.7 to 4.4°C) with a relative humidity of not less than 85%. The primary purpose of the retarder is to slow yeast fermentation while the dough is relaxing. • The dough strips are sheeted to a thickness of 1/2 to 3/4 of an inch, three times as long as wide, and roll-in shortening is spotted over two thirds of the length of the dough sheet. • The unspotted third of the dough is folded over the center third and then the remaining third on top, making three layers of dough and two layers of roll-in shortening. • The laminated dough is again rolled to approximately 1/2-inch thickness and folded into thirds. No additional roll-in shortening is used. • The folded dough pieces are then allowed to rest 20 to 30 minutes in the retarder. • The laminated dough is sheeted and again folded in thirds twice more with a 20 to 30-minute rest period in the retarder between each fold. • After rolling and folding for the last time, most Danish doughs are allowed to rest 4 to 8 hours or overnight before make-up of the individual rolls or coffee cakes. • The usual recommended proofing temperature for Danish pastry is 90 to 95°F (32.2°C), with only enough humidity to prevent crusting of the pastry surface. Proof
390
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
time is usually short, 20 to 30 minutes, to allow some expansion of the dough from the yeast, being careful to prevent melting the roll-in shortening and destroying the layering. The rolled-in shortening must have an opportunity to melt and expand the pastry in the oven to create a flaky texture. • After proofing, Danish pastry is baked at 380 to 400°F (193.3 to 204.4°C) for 15 to 20 minutes, depending on the unit size.
Several mechanized Danish pastry systems have been developed to reduce the work load involved with hand make-up. The development of dough and shortening pumps, dough and shortening extruders, sheeters, dough folders, rotary and guillotine cutters, cooling devices, and many other pieces of equipment have permitted automation of Danish-pastry production. The automated systems do not have the capacity to adapt as readily to variations in product consistency, softness, and other characteristics as bakers do with hand preparation. Hence, a greater variety of tailor-made roll-in shortenings became a necessity for automated systems to produce quality Danish pastry. The richness or amount of roll-in shortening in Danish pastry is often varied over a wide range. The most popular American type has approximately half as much rollin shortening as flour. Danish pastry has been made with as low a roll-in quantity as 20% of the flour; however, the finished product represents a poor imitation of traditional Danish pastry. It has been established that the quantity of roll-in determines the number of roll-ins required. Rich Danish doughs or those with high roll-in levels require more folds to prevent leaking and oily crust characteristics. Doughs with 70 to 80% roll-in (flour basis) require a minimum of four folds, doughs with 50% rollin should be given three folds, and doughs with lower roll-in quantities should have fewer folds to obtain some flakiness. The most important features of a roll-in shortening for Danish pastry are plasticity and firmness; the roll-in shortening should be of medium-firm consistency, slightly firmer than the average all-purpose shortening. Plasticity is necessary, as the shortening must spread or roll out in unison with the dough and then remain as unbroken layers between the dough layers during the repeated sheeting and folding operations. It must remain lump free after retarding at refrigeration temperatures. At this point, the dough and fat layers have been compressed to a thickness of approximately 1/4 inch. Hard, brittle shortenings will rupture the dough layers while sheeting, which destroys the lamination that provides the flakiness. Firmness is equally important, as a soft or oily shortening can be partly absorbed by the dough during sheeting or melted during proofing, thus reducing its role as a barrier between the dough layers, and the lamination effect is lost.26 Furthermore, the baked Danish pastry must have a good mouth feel, so the shortening should have a rather sharp melting point in the vicinity of body temperature. Briefly, the ideal Danish pastry roll-in shortening should be functional over a temperature range of 50 to 90°F (10 to 32.2°C) with a low enough melting point to provide a good mouth feel to the finished product, rather than a waxiness or greasy mouth feel that is associated with high-melting fats. Formulation of the fat blend, as well as the plasticization and tempering conditions, are essential elements for the preparation of Danish pastry roll-in shortenings.
Baking Shortenings
391
Table 6.9 Danish Roll-In Product Evolution Roll-In Shortening Margarine
Typical Analytical Characteristics
Butter
Melting Point Variations
Danish
Baker’s
Low
Middle
High
Solids Fat Index 10.0°C/50°F
33.0±
43.5±
29.0±
39.0±
24.0±
26.0±
21.1°C/70°F
14.0±
25.8±
18.0±
27.0±
20.0±
20.0± 18.0±
26.7°C/80°F
10.0±
20.6±
16.0±
22.0±
19.0±
33.3°C/92°F
3.0±
11.1±
13.0±
11.5±
16.0±
17.0±
40.0°C/104°F
—
2.0±
5.0±
2.5±
11.0±
14.0±
35.0±
40.2±
45.0±
39.0±
45.0±
52.0±
Mettler Dropping Point, °C
Evolution of these roll-in shortenings has been necessary due to changes in bakery production practices, product improvements, and the introduction of new baked pastry items. As the melting points and SFI profiles in Table 6.9 indicate, roll-in shortenings have tended to be compromises between either good functionality or good eating characteristics.27,28 This has been the general rule because the high-melting saturated fat components are excessive for good eating characteristics. On the other hand, if the high melting fractions were lowered to improve the edibility, then structure and functionality at working temperatures would suffer. Danish pastry roll-in shortenings are compound-type shortenings typically formulated with one or two basestocks and a β′ hardfat. The basestocks used are determined by the solids slope desired and stabilized with the hardfat.28 The roll-in products are formulated like all-purpose shortenings, but with a higher level of the hardfat component. The usual hydrogenated basestocks used were the 85- to 95-IV nonselective basestocks. The random interesterified 50/50 blend of soybean oil and hardfat blended with ~ 40% soybean oil should replace the soft basestock for a trans fatty acid formulation. The hardfat added to the soft basestock may be hydrogenated or a less saturated stearin obtained by fractionation. The softer stearin allows a higher addition level to flatten the solids slope without increasing the melting point to intolerable waxy mouth-feel levels. This would be a logical situation to employ directed interesterification to produce a trans fatty acid free formulation. Plasticization conditions are especially important for roll-in shortenings to produce the desired workability at the refrigerator temperatures used for Danish pastry make-up. The plasticization process is normally performed as outlined in chapter 2 in Figure 2.10, using a tubular scraped-wall heat exchanger to rapidly chill the molten oil blend from a temperature not in excess of 20°F (11.1°C) above or more than 10°F (5.6°C) below the product melting point to a temperature within a range of about 60 to 70°F (15.6 to 21.1°C) to initiate development of the β′-crystal nuclei. Immediately after the chilling-unit step, the shortening is worked or kneaded for a time sufficient to further develop the β′-crystalline phase, which causes a product temperature rise before filling of 10 to 15°F (5.5 to 8.3°C). Typically, properly plasticized roll-in shortening forms a slight mound in the container as it fills. After filling,
392
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
the packaged shortening is held at an elevated temperature, usually 85°F (29.4°C), for 48 to 72 hours, until the crystal structure of the hard fraction reaches equilibrium and forms a stable crystal matrix. 6.17 PUFF PASTE ROLL-IN SHORTENING Puff pastry is an expanded, flaky, baked product best known for making turnovers, patty shells, and crème horns. It is prepared by layering puff paste shortening into a tough but pliable dough in much the same manner as for Danish pastry. Layers of fat are interleaved between layers of dough so that, when baked, the dough layers expand. Danish pastry, which is a yeast-leavened dough, has a relatively soft and porous structure in the baked-dough layers. Laminated, unleavened puff pastry doughs produce a very open network of crisp and flaky layers. Puff pastry dough formulations generally include equal weights of flour and puff paste shortening with water at half the flour weight; salt to flavor; and a low level of cream of tartar, vinegar, or lemon juice to facilitate the sheeting operation. Two general methods of incorporating puff paste into the pastry dough include:
1. French method: The roll-in shortening is applied by hand or extruder onto sheeted dough, folded, resheeted, and refolded several times to form the thin interleaved layers of fat and dough. 2. Scotch or Blitz method: The roll-in shortening is added to the dough at the end of the mixing period and mixed only briefly to distribute the shortening before sheeting and folding to form layers of fat and dough.
Roll-in shortening has several functions in puff pastry. In the conventional French method of preparation, a portion of the shortening is incorporated into the puff pastry dough during the mixing operation. This portion, usually about 15% of the total shortening requirement, has the same function of any shortening in a dough: lubrication. The major portion of the shortening is spread between the folds of the dough. This portion of the shortening gives puff pastries their lift and flaky texture. The shortening is rolled into thin layers, alternating with the dough during the course of folding to form 1215 layers with 6 threefolds. This provides a natural cleavage point during baking. The fat layers expand upon melting, aided by steam produced by the moisture in many puff paste shortenings to create the internal lift. The properties desired for puff paste roll-in shortening to produce puff pastry with excellent volume when baked with even layers resembling the pages in a book include the following: • Plasticity over a wide temperature range permits stretching during the sheeting and folding process, but the dough remains as unbroken layers, characterized by a flat SFI curve. • A firm and waxy, but not brittle, consistency, equivalent to the dough at retarder temperatures, produces uniform, thin layers. Puff paste shortening with too firm of a consistency can rupture the dough layers during the sheeting operation. A product with too soft of a consistency will soak into the dough layers to produce a tender
Baking Shortenings
393
flake that does not puff or rise. The roll-in shortening consistency can be evaluated by kneading a small sample in your hand. A good product will act like modeling clay; it will change shape without feeling brittle or lumpy and it will not become sticky or greasy.29 • The shortening can be distinguished from other shortenings in that it is one of the higher melting, edible-fat products produced from animal fats or vegetable oils with final melting points, on the order of 115 to 135°F (46.1 to 57.2°C). • Puff paste shortenings can be prepared both as emulsions of oil or fat with water (usually 10%) or as an anhydrous product without the addition of water. Hydrous puff paste shortenings usually contain approximately 0.5% α-monoglycerides or 0.1 to 0.2% lecithin for emulsion stability. Mono- and diglycerides prepared with low-iodine-value basestocks provide optimum emulsion stability. Traditionally, bakers have thought that for puff paste shortening to function, it must contain water, but anhydrous products have proven to be as functional as many hydrous roll-in shortenings.30 • A β′-crystal habit produces a fine three-dimensional network capable of immobilizing a large amount of liquid oil.
Animal/vegetable blended products were the preferred puff paste shortenings because of their more even puff, probably due to the somewhat sticky consistency and oxidized flavor and odor of all-vegetable products. These all-vegetable products were almost true compound-type shortenings prepared by blending about 25% cottonseed oil hardfat with unhydrogenated vegetable oils, usually cottonseed or soybean oil. The sticky puff paste penetrated into the dough layers, causing them to rise unevenly when baked, and the polyunsaturates oxidized rapidly, which produced an off-flavor and odor. All vegetable-oil puff pastes were improved by the use of brush and partially hydrogenated basestocks with β′ hardfats to produce the high meltingpoint and flat SFI slopes required with better oxidative stability. Trans fatty acids could be eliminated and a better oxidative stability effected with the substitution of any of the high-oleic oils for the partially hydrogenated basestock. The typical SFI and melting point ranges for puff paste shortenings are shown in Table 6.10. For decades, puff paste was solidified on the surface of a chill roll, held in troughs to allow formation of the stable crystal form, and then texturized before packaging. An advantage of this process was the long resting time between chilling and Table 6.10 Puff Paste Typical SFI and Melting Point Ranges Solids Fat Index
Range
10.0°C/50°F
26.0 to 40.0
21.1°C/70°F
24.0 to 38.0
26.7°C/80°F
22.0 to 34.0
33.3°C/92°F
21.0 to 28.0
40.0°C/104°F
17.0 to 24.0
Mettler Melting Point °C
49.0 to 53.0
°F
120.0 to 127.0
394
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
working or texturizing, which ensured an almost ideal state of crystallization before the working step. Even slow crystallizing fat blends could be processed to produce firm, plastic puff paste without a tendency toward postcrystallization. The chill-roll plasticizing systems are labor intensive and, therefore, expensive, and a high risk of contamination exists, thus process developments using the same tubular scrapedwall chilling units as other shortening or margarine products assumed a high priority. Processing techniques have been identified that produce acceptable puff paste products and generally consist of:31,32 • The product cooling and working time should be prolonged by reducing the equipment throughput to approximately half the normal production rate for standard shortenings for crystal development. • Postcrystallization must be reduced or controlled as much as possible to obtain good plasticity; in-package temperature rise after packaging is a measure of postcrystallization. • Cooling temperatures should be programmed during crystallization for shock chilling in the initial stages, followed by more moderate temperature reductions in succeeding chilling units. • Addition of a cooling stage after chilling or insertion of a working step between cooling steps has been used to dissipate the heat of crystallization and create a more stable crystal structure to reduce tempering requirements. Normal tempering at 85°F (29.4°C) can require up to 10 days, depending on the package size, to attain the desired texture and plasticity. These additions speed up puff paste tempering, but have not totally eliminated this requirement for optimum performance, especially for slow crystallizing formulations. • Incorporation of quiescent resting tubes with sieve plates capable of holding 10 to 15% of the hourly capacity allows the product sufficient time to exchange the supercooled condition for crystallization equilibrium. This time lag converts the product from a viscous fluid to a solid suitable for forming into parchment-wrapped, 5-pound prints; 2-1/2-pound, parchment-divided sheets; or 50-pound containers.
6.18 SHORTENING CHIPS Shortening chips were developed to provide a flaky baked product, similar to Danish pastry, without the traditional roll-in process. The chips can be incorporated into a dough or batter just before the mixing process is complete to distribute them throughout. During baking, shortening chips melt causing small pockets that simulate the flakiness of laminated doughs. Flavors, colors, and spices can be encapsulated in the shortening chips to leave pockets of color and flavor where the chips have melted during baking. Shortening chips have been commercially available in three flavors: plain, butter, and cinnamon sugar. These products have found application in biscuits, pizza doughs, breads, simulated Danish pastry, croissants, dinner rolls, cookies, pie crusts, and various dry mixes, such as biscuit, pancake, muffin, waffle, and others. Shortening chips were typically selectively hydrogenated to attain a steep SFI slope with a melting point as low as possible to still allow the product to maintain
Baking Shortenings
395
a chip form after packaging, during shipment to the food processor, while processing into the finished product, and until heated for preparation by the foodservice operator, baker, or homemaker. The chips, formulated with partially hydrogenated basestocks using the basestock system in chapter 4, Table 4.6, could be a blend of the 60- and 66-IV bases, or a product can be hydrogenated specially to meet the desired SFI and melting point limits. Either interesterification or fractionation processes can be utilized to modify the basestocks to eliminate trans fatty acids. Shortening chips made with partially hydrogenated domestic oils usually have melting points ranging from 110 to 118°F (43.3 to 47.8°C). Lauric oil-based shortening chips offer a sharper and lower melt than the typical shortening chips made with soybean oil. The melting points for the lauric oil-based chips normally range from 101 to 108°F (38.3 to 42.2°C). Shortening chips have also been prepared with domestic oils hydrogenated with a sulfur-proportioned catalyst. The specially hydrogenated vegetable-oil products do not have quite as sharp a melt as the lauric oil-based products and they contain high levels of trans fatty acids, but they are not susceptible to soapy off-flavors that develop with hydrolysis of lauric fatty acids. Shortening chips can experience high surface-moisture contents during solidification, which can expedite the hydrolysis reaction. Shortening chips are flaked to produce a product form that can be easily handled and incorporated into prepared foods while still maintaining the chip integrity. Flakes are produced on chill rolls, which solidify the hardened oils into chips that are thicker than the usual flaked product. The thicker chip product allows the product to maintain a larger form during distribution and while being incorporated into the finished product. The chip products are usually packaged in 50-pound cases and may require refrigeration to dissipate the heat of crystallization and to maintain the desired chip integrity. 6.19 CRACKER SHORTENINGS Crackers contain little or no sugar and have a low moisture content, but they have moderately high levels of shortening: 10 to 20% based on the flour weight or 6 to 14% total basis. Snack-cracker formulas vary more widely than saltines and usually contain higher shortening levels for richness and flavor enhancement. The chief emphasis in the selection of a cracker shortening is a bland or mild flavor with a good oxidative stability. Plastic range is not of significance importance because the major function of the shortening is lubrication. Most cracker shortenings utilized in the United States are composed of hydrogenated soybean oil with a relatively steep SFI to melt at or slightly above body temperature with a long AOM stability, but the shortenings can also be made with hydrogenated lard or blends of tallow with hydrogenated vegetable oils and or palm or palm oil fractions. Table 6.11 shows typical analytical data for an all-vegetable and a blended animal and vegetable high-stability shortening utilized for crackers.
396
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 6.11 High Stability Cracker Shortenings: Typical Analytical Data Hydrogenated
Meat Fat and
Soybean Oil
Vegetable Oil Blend
10.0°C / 50°F
43.0±
39.0±
21.1°C / 70°F
27.0±
28.0±
26.7°C / 80°F
21.0±
24.0±
33.3°C / 92°F
9.0±
17.0±
40.0°C / 104°F
5.0±
11.0±
Mettler Melting Point, °C
43.0±
46.0±
AOM Stability, hours
200+
100+
Analytical Characteristics Solids Fat Index
Note: AOM = active oxygen method.
REFERENCES
1. Baldwin, R.R., Baldry, R.P., and Johansen, R.G., Fat systems for baking producers, JAOCS, 49, 473–477, 1972. 2. Latondress, E., Shortening and margarines, base stock preparation and formulation, in Handbook of Soy Oil Processing and Utilization, Erickson, D.R. et al. Eds., American Soybean Association and AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1980, pp. 146–154. 3. Duns, M.M., Palm oil in margarines and shortenings, JAOCS, 62, 410, 1985. 4. Timms, R.E., Physical properties and mixtures of oils, JAOCS, 62, 245–247, 1985. 5. Daglioglu, O., Tasan, M., and Tuncel, B., Effects of microwave and conventional baking on the oxidative stability and fatty acid composition of puff pastry, JAOCS, 77, 2000, pp. 543–545. 6. Ovesen, L., Leth, T., and Hansen, K., Fatty acid composition and contents of trans monounsaturated fatty acids in frying fats, and in margarines and shortenings marketed in Denmark, JAOCS, 75, 1998, pp. 1079–1083. 7. Zeitoun, M.A.M. et al., Physical properties of interesterified fat blends, JAOCS, 70, 467–471, 1993. 8. List, G.R. and Reeves, R., Trans reduction, in Trans Fat Alternatives, Kodali, D.R. and List, G.R., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2005, p. 75. 9. List, G.R. et al., Soft mrgarines from high stearic acid soybean oils, JAOCS, 78, 103–104, 2001. 10. Markley, K.S., Esters and esterification, in Fatty Acids Their Chemistry, Properties, Production, and Uses, Part 2, 2nd ed., Markley, K.S., Ed., Interscience Publishers, New York, 1961, p. 891. 11. Rossell, J.B., Fractionation of lauric oils, JAOCS 62, 389, 1985. 12. Colth, H.S., Richardson, A.S., and Votaw, V.M., U.S. Patent Nos. 2,132,393 and 2,132,398, 1938. 13. Epstein, A.K. and Harris, B.K., U.S. Patent No. 2,132,046, 1938. 14. Howard, N.B., The role of some essential ingredients in the formation of layer cake structures, The Baker’s Digest, 46(10), 28–37, 1972. 15. Painter, K.A., Functions and requirements of fats and emulsifiers in prepared cake mixes, JAOCS, 58, 92–95, 1981.
Baking Shortenings
397
16. Paulicka, F.R., Shortening products, in Edible Fats and Oils Processing: Basic Principles and Modern Practices, World Conference Proceedings, Erickson, D.R., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1990, pp. 205–206. 17. Brody, H. and Cochran, W.M., Shortening for bakery cream icings and cream fillers, The Baker’s Digest, 52(12), 22–26, 1978. 18. Moncrieff, J., Shortenings and emulsifiers for cakes and icings, The Baker’s Digest, 44(10), 62–63, 1970. 19. Weiss, T.J., Bakery shortenings, in Food Oils and Their Uses, 2nd ed., AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1983, pp. 153–154. 20. Stauffer, C.E., Bakery product applications, in Fats and Oils, Stauffer, C.E., Ed., Eagan Press, St. Paul, MN, 1996, p. 73. 21. Oszanyi, A.G., Complete fluid shortenings for bread and rolls, in Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Bakery Engineers, March 4–7, 1974, Chicago, IL, pp. 48–53. 22. Werner, L.E., Shortening systems, in Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Bakery Engineers, March 2–4, 1981, Chicago, IL, pp. 61–70. 23. Mattil, K.F., Bakery products and confections, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 3rd ed., Swern, D., Ed., Interscience, New York, 1964, p. 382. 24. Kincs, F.R., Meat fat formulations, JAOCS, 62, 815–816, 1985. 25. Gordon, W.C., Rolled-in coffee cakes and danish pastry, in Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Bakery Engineers, March 6–9, 1961, Chicago, IL, pp. 215–220. 26. Colburn, J.T. and Pankey, G.R., Margarines, roll-ins and puff pastry shortenings, The Baker’s Digest, 38(4), 66–72, 1964. 27. Van den Berg Food Ingredients Group, product catalog, Joliet, IL, 1992, p. 9. 28. Vey, J.E., Danish, in Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Bakery Engineers, March 2–5, 1986, Chicago, IL, pp. 111–120. 29. Weiss, T.J., Margarine, in Food Oils and Their Uses, 2nd ed., AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1983, pp. 205–207. 30. Kriz, E.R. and Oszlanyi, A.G., U.S. Patent No. 3,985,911, October 12, 1976. 31. Klimes, J., Shortening: Europe formulation and processing, in Edible Fats and Oils Processing: Basic Principals and Modern Practices, World Conference Proceedings, Erickson, D.R., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1990, pp. 207–213. 32. Alexandersen, K., Margarine production, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Emerging Technologies in the Fats and Oils Industry, Baldwin, A.R., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1986, pp. 66–70.
Chapter 7
Frying Shortenings
7.1 INTRODUCTION Deep-fat frying has been a part of Chinese cooking for centuries. It remained an art until it gradually evolved into a science prompted by a need for better and faster food preparation methods. Deep-fat frying has become one of the more important methods of food preparation used by the foodservice, snack, and baking industries as well as the home kitchen. Frying technology development has determined that many of the principles apply equally to all types of commercial deep-fat frying, but each type of frying also has distinctive requirements not shared by all. Because frying fats play such a unique role in the food preparation technique, an increase in acceptance of fried foods parallels the advancements made in the processing of improved frying shortenings along with the improvements in frying equipment and the other ingredients. The deep-fat frying process consists most simply of partially or totally immersing the food prepared for frying into a body of heated frying fat, which is contained in a metal vessel. The food is maintained in the fat at the appropriate frying temperature for the duration required to cook the product. Going into the kettle are (1) frying fat, (2) heat, and (3) food prepared for frying. Emerging from the kettle are (1) steam and steam-entrained frying fat, (2) volatile byproducts of heating and frying, (3) the finished product, and, with filtering, (4) the crumbs or foreign solid byproducts of the frying operation.1 The result of deep-fat frying is a food with a distinctive structure. The outer zone consists of the surface area, which contributes to the initial visual impact. This surface is generally an even, golden brown color resulting from a browning reaction that occurs when the sugars and proteins in the product react in the presence of heat. The degree of browning depends on the time and temperature of frying in combination with the chemical composition of the food being fried, rather than on the shortening or source of fat or oils in the fryer. The crust of crisp exterior skin formed on the food by dehydration during frying is the second part of the outer zone. Heat during frying reduces the moisture 399
400
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
content of this layer to 3% or less, and the water driven off is responsible for most of the steam released during frying. The void created by this moisture loss is filled by absorbed frying shortening. This absorbed fat exerts a tenderizing effect on the crust in addition to contributing flavor, crispness, and pleasant eating characteristics. The amount of frying fat absorbed by the food, which varies with the product being fried, is governed by the ratio of crust to core; for example, potato chips with a large surface area and very little core absorb approximately 30 to 40% fat, whereas French fried potatoes, which have a smaller surface and crust area in relation to the core area, absorb only 7 to 10% fat.2 Usually, the function of a heat-exchange fluid is to transfer heat from the source to the material being heated or the reverse if cooling is involved. In most situations, the heat-exchange fluid is an inert material that experiences little change during the process, and its sole purpose is heat exchange. Frying shortenings are a notable exception to the heat-exchange fluids commonly used for heat transfer. The deep-fat frying process utilizes the fact that heat is rapidly and efficiently transferred to the product being processed via direct contact of the heat transfer agent with the food, but instead of acting as an inert heating media it becomes a part of the finished product. Then, because the frying fat is a food, it must be easily broken down into its component parts for digestion when eaten. Therefore, it must be considered as a relatively unstable heat-exchange fluid that is exposed to its five natural enemies while performing its intended functions:
1. Heat: Frying temperatures ranging from 300 to 425°F (148.9 to 218.3°C) are necessary to properly prepare the different fried food products. Unfortunately, exposure to high temperatures accelerates all of the breakdown reactions of fats and oils. Heating alone with no frying taking place will cause a frying shortening to break down, rendering it unacceptable for further use. 2. Air: Oxygen from the air is necessary to sustain human life, but it also reacts with the double bonds in the frying shortenings to oxidize the unsaturated fatty acids, which results in offensive odors and flavors and promotes gum formation or polymerization. Laboratory testing has proven that oxygen presence is necessary for frying fat deterioration and that the rate of change is directly proportional to the degree of exposure of the fat surface to oxygen.3 3. Moisture: All food products contain moisture, which causes hydrolysis of fats and oils, resulting in an increased fat absorption in most foods. Free fatty acids themselves do not produce the increased absorption, lower smoke point, and objectionable flavors, but, when split from the triglyceride, they leave mono- and diglycerides and free glycerin, which cause the changes.4 4. Contamination: Any material associated with the frying process that either causes the frying media to deteriorate or accelerates the process is a contaminant. The food fried is an unavoidable contaminant. For instance, it may leach different fat types into the frying shortening, such as chicken fat, tallow, or fish oils that reduce the frying stability, whereas foods, such as onions and fish, are obvious contributors of strong flavors. Some examples of other frying fat contaminates include: a. Trace metals: Most metals are prooxidants that exert a marked catalytic effect to accelerate fat breakdown, but some metals are much more active than others. These prooxidants can be picked up during processing or storage or from frying
Frying Shortenings
401
equipment, the food fried, or some other contact with a metal. Two metals that promote more rapid breakdown of frying than others are brass and copper. b. Soap or detergent: Residue of these materials (from cleaning storage tanks, fryers, or utensils) acts as an emulsifier in the frying fat and catalyzes fat breakdown. c. Gums or polymerized fats: Polymerized fats or oils added to fresh oil act as catalysts that accelerate the formation of more gums, which contribute to foaming and darkening. d. Burnt food particles: Food particles allowed to remain in the frying fat impart a bitter, caramelized, or burnt taste along with an unappealing appearance to the fried food and accelerate frying shortening breakdown. 5. Time: The extent of exposure of a frying shortening to the other enemies determines the degree of product deterioration.
Two beneficial frying-fat quality factors arise during the frying operation. One is the steam released during frying, and the other is the addition of fresh shortening to replace the fat absorbed by the food fried. Steam formed from the moisture released from the food mixes intimately with the fat and, when given off, it carries with it the odor- and flavor-bearing volatile byproducts of frying that would otherwise accumulate in the frying fat, adversely affecting the flavor and odor of the fried food. This steam continually scrubs, or purges, the frying fat of potential off-flavors and odors each time food is fried, even though it is the same moisture that causes hydrolysis. Fresh shortening must be added to the fryer to compensate for the fat removed by the fried food. This addition helps overcome the changes to the frying fat brought about by heat and the other frying-fat enemies. Obviously, the frying fat will remain in better condition when higher replacement shortening quantities are required. The ratio of the fryer capacity to the rate at which the fresh shortening is added to replenish the fryer is referred to as turnover rate, or the number of hours required for the addition of fresh frying shortening equal to the amount of fat maintained in the fryer. Because oxidative changes occur continuously in heated fats, turnover must be related to the total period that the fat is heated, rather than only the actual time the product is fried. Obviously, the quality and, especially, the flavor of the frying fat will be maintained at a more desirable level with the highest turnover rate or, stated another way, the shortest turnover time equates to the best frying-fat condition. In general, an operation with a turnover of less than a day should never have to discard used frying shortening because of breakdown, except in the case of product abuse or presence of a contaminant. Operations with slower turnover rates need to include this product quality and economic factor in their frying-shortening selection criteria. In terms of turnover, food processor operations that fry products, such as salty snacks, donuts, prefried frozen foods, or blanched foods, have two definite advantages over foodservice restaurant operations:
1. Complete shortening turnover on less than a daily basis because of the volume of food fried and the absorption rate of the food product 2. Frying on a continuous basis during a majority of the time that the fat is at frying temperature
402
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
In foodservice kitchens, the nature of the deep-fat frying operation is quite different. The rate of turnover varies considerably between restaurants, but averages 20 to 35% per day. The low turnover is caused by the following:
1. The lower volume of food fried lowers the absorbed fat removal from the frying kettle. 2. Frying is not continuous, but has peaks and lulls, which results in the fat being heated for long periods without any fat removal by absorption.
Under restaurant conditions, it is close to impossible to achieve a turnover rate high enough to avoid discarding used frying fat, while most snack and bakery frying operations should never have to discard frying shortening. 7.2 FRYING SHORTENING ADDITIVES Hydrogenation contributes frying stability to frying shortenings by saturation or isomerization of the double bonds to take away the reaction or weak points in the frying shortenings. Another significant contributor to frying stability is the antifoamer dimethylpolysiloxane. Addition of this additive to a frying shortening at levels of 0.5 to 2.0 parts per million (ppm) effectively retards oxidation and polymerization, which promote foaming during frying. Frying stability increases of 3 to 10 times the original frying stability results have been confirmed by controlled laboratory frying evaluations. The degree of the stability increase is dependent on the stability of the frying fat without the antifoamer. Frying shortenings with a high frying stability before the antifoamer addition benefit more than products with a lesser initial frying stability. This additive has substantially changed the frying parameters for frying operations with poor or slow turnover rates. The use of dimethylpolysiloxane as an antifoaming agent for frying shortenings is well known and widely practiced. Foam suppression is an indirect result of the inhibition of oxidation, which means that dimethylpolysiloxane is actually an antioxidant that prevents the buildup of oxidation products during frying that are foam promoting. The use of dimethylpolysiloxane as an antifoamer was first reported by Martin,5 who showed that a concentration of 0.03 ppm was sufficient to inhibit oxidation of the frying oil, as indicated by changes in a variety of physical and chemical properties of the frying shortening over a prolonged heating period. Later, Babayan6 showed that low concentrations of dimethylpolysiloxane can also raise the smoke point of an oil by as much as 25°F (13.9°C), indicating that dimethylpolysiloxane is effective as a surface-to-air barrier for frying shortenings. Freeman et al.7 also concluded that the protective effect is due to a monolayer of dimethylpolysiloxane on the oil-to-air surface, which retards oxidative polymerization. Because of the inert nature of the dimethylpolysiloxane molecule, silicone-based antifoamers will not react with the frying shortenings and remain effective until reduced to low levels by removal with the food fried. Dimethylpolysiloxane, a defoaming agent, may be safely used in processed foods at a level not exceeding 10 ppm, per 21 CFR 173.340.8 The effective level for frying
Frying Shortenings
403
fats is less than 0.5 ppm, and evaluations indicate that use levels should not exceed 2 ppm. The concentration of dimethylpolysiloxane in oils extracted from fried foods increases as the concentration of dimethylpolysiloxane in the frying shortening is increased. Food absorption of the antifoamer is probably dependent on the mechanical pickup of excess dimethylpolysiloxane from the frying fat, which occurs because of the low solubility of dimethylpolysiloxane in fats and oils. Droplets of excess dimethylpolysiloxane actually appear in the frying fat when the concentration exceeds 1 ppm. This excess dimethylpolysiloxane will adhere to any available surface, such as the walls of the fryer, a fryer basket, or the fried food.7 The extremely low solubility of dimethylpolysiloxane can result in dispersion problems for fats and oils processors if not handled properly. In addition to the insolubility of dimethylpolysiloxane, it has a much heavier density than the frying shortenings. thus the antifoamer is only dispersible in frying shortenings and must be agitated thoroughly before and preferably during packaging to keep it in suspension. Dispersion problems lead to high concentrations of dimethylpolysiloxane in portions of the frying shortening, a condition that violates the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations and creates foam rather than preventing it. Dimethylpolysiloxane levels somewhere between 10 and 50 ppm promote immediate foaming of frying shortenings. Dimethylpolysiloxane cannot be used indiscriminately because it has an adverse effect on some food products:9,10 • Unintentional incorporation of the antifoamer into shortenings for cake and icing preparation will cause aeration problems that result in poor volumes for the finished products. • Cookies prepared with shortenings containing as little as 0.5 ppm dimethylpolysiloxane have experienced spread problems. • The antifoamer has been blamed for defoaming cake donut batters at the surface to yield a deformed donut, increased fat absorption, and poor sugar and glaze adherence to both cake and yeast-raised donuts. • Potato chips fried in dimethylpolysiloxane-treated frying shortening lack desirable crispness.
Antioxidants are materials that can retard the development of oxidation in fats and oils. Vegetable oils contain natural antioxidants, tocopherols, that can survive most processing and frying conditions. In addition, several phenolic compounds have been identified that can also increase oxidative stability. It has been postulated and proven that deep-fat frying conditions of high temperature and steam distillation rapidly deplete phenolic antioxidants. Tests performed with butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), and tertiary butylhydroquinone (TBHQ) showed that all three phenolic antioxidants were volatilized to depletion at approximately the same rate. However, in spite of the disappearance of the antioxidants, their use does produce an increased active oxygen method (AOM) stability of the used frying shortening and a longer product shelf life than identical product fried in antioxidant-free shortenings. Evaluations comparing BHA-, BHT-, and TBHQstabilized frying shortenings showed that TBHQ provides the maximum protection
404
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
at frying temperatures as well as the best “carry-through” effectiveness for the fried foods. An assumption for this result is that TBHQ breakdown products may also be effective antioxidants. BHA and BHT were also found somewhat effective, but to a much lesser degree than TBHQ.11,12 Even if the antioxidants did not provide any protection at frying temperatures, the protection provided to the frying shortenings before the frying operation is beneficial. Fats and oils oxidation has two different phases. During the initial or induction period, oxidation proceeds at a relatively slow but uniform rate. Then, after a certain amount of oxidation has occurred, the reaction enters a second phase characterized by a rapidly accelerating rate of oxidation. Antioxidants cause an increase not only in the resistance to oxidation, but also in the amount of oxidation required to produce offensive flavors and odors. The protection afforded the frying shortening to maintain a low oxidation level before entering the frying kettle equates to improved oxidative frying stability. Oxidation can also be accelerated or catalyzed by trace amounts of metals in frying shortenings. Fats and oils can obtain metal contents from the soils where the plants are grown and later from contact during crushing, processing, storage, and transportation and from the frying equipment or food being fried. Copper has been identified as the most harmful metal, followed by iron, manganese, chromium, and nickel. Many frying shortenings are hydrogenated with nickel catalyst to increase the oxidative stability; if appreciable levels of the catalyst are left in the hydrogenated oils, the protection afforded by lowering the unsaturation level will be somewhat negated by the catalytic effect of the nickel content. To avoid this problem, most processors add chelating agents after the deodorization process to complex with the prooxidative metals. The most widely used chelating agent is citric acid. Phosphoric acid has been used by some fats and oils processors, but problems with over chelating can easily occur to cause an increase in free fatty acid, darkening, and flavor reversion to a watermelon flavor during frying. This same problem can also occur with citric acid, but it is a weaker acid, which provides a higher margin for error. 7.3 SELECTION OF FRYING SHORTENING The criteria for selecting frying shortening are the same as for foodservice and food-processor operations. In both cases, the frying shortening must be matched to the performance requirements of the product fried, limitations of the frying equipment, and demands of the operation. Ideally, a frying shortening should be selected on the basis of the eating, keeping, and other functional characteristics that are desired in the fried food. It is generally agreed that frying shortenings should possess and maintain the following characteristics during frying: (1) a light color, (2) a surface free from foam, (3) a clear appearance free from burnt particles, (4) a bland flavor that enhances the eating quality of the fried food, and (5) no offensive smoke emission. All fresh frying shortenings possess these characteristics; however, with continued use the frying shortenings change due to the influences of heat, air, moisture, contaminants, time of use, frying equipment, and other deteriorating factors associated with the frying process. If the frying fat is permitted to deteriorate excessively,
Frying Shortenings
405
then flavor, appearance, and eating characteristics of the fried food will be at risk. Again, it is important that the frying shortening be matched to the performance requirements of the product being fried, the limitations of the frying equipment, and the demands of the frying operation. The frying shortening type or composition that can satisfy these requirements can be determined by careful identification of the prerequisites for each operation. Three areas for consideration in the selection of the proper frying shortening are product characteristics, frying life, and shelf life. 7.3.1 Product Characteristics Fried food product characteristics must be a major consideration in the selection of frying shortening. Product criteria can be divided into three functional areas to help identify the ideal frying shortening for the intended food application and operation: • Palatability: During frying, fats react with the protein and carbohydrate components of food, developing unique flavors and odors as well as browned color, all of which are desirable to the consumer. In addition to flavor, frying fats significantly influence other important eating characteristics, including lubricity, mouth feel, flavor release, and a rich eating quality. Lubricity and mouth feel reflect the physical nature of the frying medium, ranging from juicy for liquid oil to creamy for soft fats to dry and then waxy for fats with higher solid fat index (SFI) or solid fat content (SFC) values and melting points. Melting characteristics also influence the rate of flavor release. When the frying fat is a liquid, or below body temperature, the full flavor of the product is available at the beginning of mastication. Both flavor intensity and speed of release are diminished with solid fats, depending on the composition and melting characteristics of the particular fat used. Additionally, the relationship of the other ingredients must be considered. An all-purpose shortening with a relatively high melting point gives donuts a pleasant creamy mouth feel; however, the use of the same shortening to fry potato chips will produce a product without flavor and a waxy mouth feel. • Product appearance: The solids-to-liquid ratio of the absorbed fat influences the appearance of fried foods. Higher SFI values at the consumption temperature will present a dry surface appearance; as the level decreases, a shiny appearance develops. The degree of apparent differences and importance varies with food types. Appearance wise, the frying shortening will provide an oily surface or the illusion of greater fat absorption if it has a low melting point due to a high liquid oil content. Shortenings with higher melting points provide different shades of dullness depending on the degree of hydrogenation. • Product feel: Crystallization properties of the frying shortening, which coat the product surface, determine the product feel. A soft or low-melting frying shortening contributes a degree of oiliness, and high-melting products impart a drier surface by solidification at the consumption temperature. Frying shortenings consistency changes during frying can significantly change the product appearance and feel.
7.3.2 Frying Life The unavoidable exposure of frying shortening to the adverse conditions in varying degrees dictates that frying stability is a major economic and quality factor
406
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
that frying operations must consider when choosing a frying shortening. The frying stability of a shortening is dependent upon the fat composition, physical characteristics, and how it is used. Exposure time, as determined by turnover rate, is one the most important factors for identification of the shortening characteristics required to maintain the required fried product quality for the maximum time. Highturnover situations will allow the use of frying shortenings with a lower stability, which usually equates to higher liquid oil levels. Low-turnover situations demand high-stability shortenings, which normally equates to a higher degree of saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids. The factors that adversely affect frying stability or frying shortening life are oxidation, polymerization, hydrolysis and isomerization. Oxidation is the combining of oxygen with the unsaturated fatty acids, which causes off-flavor and odor development along with color darkening. Oxidation is accelerated at the higher temperatures necessary for frying foods. The oxidation rate is roughly proportional to the degree of unsaturation; linolenic fatty acid, with three double bonds, is much more susceptible than oleic fatty acid, which has only one. Therefore, shortenings with high polyunsaturated fatty acid levels have the least resistance to oxidation, which precedes polymerization. The frying shortening factors that affect the oxidation rate are (1) the degree of saturation or isomerization or the unsaturation level, (2) the addition of antifoamers, (3) the addition of phenolic antioxidants, (4) the tocopherol or natural antioxidant level, and (5) the use of chelating agents. Polymerization is the combining of many triglyceride molecules to form three-dimensional polymers. Heat accelerates polymerization, which results in an increased frying-fat viscosity, which reduces its ability to transfer heat. Lower heat transfer results in a higher fat absorption, and polymerization continues to the degree that it eventually results in foaming. Foam develops when the heated fat will not release the moisture from the food, but keeps it trapped while also incorporating air. Unsaturated fatty acids have the least resistance to polymerization. Hydrolysis is a breakdown of the fat induced by the presence of moisture and is accelerated by heat. It results in free fatty acid, diglyceride, monoglyceride, and glycerin development, which causes off-flavors, smoking, increased fat absorption, and darkening of the frying shortening. Isomerization is activated by the high temperature and residence time during the frying process to convert natural cis unsaturated fatty acids to a trans-isomer. The fatty acids most susceptible to isomerization with heat treatment are the polyunsaturated fatty acids. The probability of isomerization of linolenic (C-18:3) fatty acid to the trans-isomer is 12 to 14 times higher than that of linoleic (C-18:2) fatty acid13 and oleic (C-18:1) fatty acid is the most resistant. Formation of geometrical and positional isomers during frying was substantiated by heat treatment evaluations of vegetable oils14 and evaluation of fresh and used oils collected from two different major fast food restaurants.15 7.3.3 Shelf Life When fried food is consumed immediately, as is the case for restaurant operations, product shelf life is not a necessary consideration for the frying selection.
Frying Shortenings
407
However, for finished products that will experience severe or prolonged storage periods before consumption, shelf life must be an important part of the selection criteria. Oxidative stability must continue after the frying period for products packaged and marketed through a distribution system. The frying shortening oxidative stability requirements will depend on the level of fat absorption by the product, packaging protection, expected shelf and use life, and the product itself. Oxidative stability analysis of the frying shortening is the major indicator of the shelf life of the fried product. The degree of unsaturation is the determining factor for increasing the shelf life of a fried product. In general, the more unsaturated the fatty acid, the faster the rate of oxidation. 7.4 FOODSERVICE DEEP-FAT FRYING SHORTENING APPLICATIONS Deep-fat frying is a very important cooking method for the foodservice industry. Deep-fat frying is chosen both for rapid food preparation and for producing foods with a desired texture and flavor. The high temperatures used cause rapid heat penetration and provide short cooking times. Fast-food preparation allows greater customer turnover during peak periods and provides better service to customers during the slow periods. Deep-fat frying is also economical because the restaurant fries only what is ordered, which eliminates leftovers; frozen or refrigerated foods may be prepared quickly, thus eliminating food loss due to spoilage; and the heat is concentrated for little waste of utilities. Foodservice frying requirements peak and ebb throughout the day because frying is conducted on demand. The fryers are usually operated at full capacity for a few hours, intermittently for a few hours, and idle the rest of the time. Operating a fryer on an intermittent basis is part of restaurant frying and is a primary reason why the frying fat must be discarded and replaced periodically. Frying fat held at frying temperatures without frying deteriorates rapidly. The evaporating steam from the food fried acts to strip the decomposition products from the frying fat and, thus, delaying fat deterioration. Another reason why foodservice frying fats must be replaced periodically is the turnover rate. In foodservice kitchens, the rate of turnover varies considerably, but the average is in the 20 to 35% range. The low rate of turnover is the result of a relatively low fat absorption and the fact that frying is not continuous. Low turnover and the necessity for frying many different types of foods in most restaurant frying operations makes it almost impossible to avoid the necessity to discard abused frying shortening. Determination of the point at which to discard used shortening has a significant economic impact: high shortening cost when the used fat is discarded too early and poor food quality if the discard point is too late. Some of the most commonly used frying shortening indicators that restaurant kitchens use to determine when to discard their used product and replace it with fresh shortening include: • Color: Used frying shortening is discarded when the heated oil matches a certain color standard or when visibility through the heated oil is impaired at a definite distance.
408
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
• Smoke: Used frying shortening is discarded when smoking reaches a predetermined disagreeable point. Smoke is caused by hydrolysis and oxidation, which lower the smoke point. • Food condition: Used shortening is replaced when the fried food attains a predetermined flavor, odor, and or greasiness point. This method evaluates the product from a customer viewpoint. • Foaming: The amount of foaming is used by some operators to determine the discard point; with experience, five different stages of foaming may be identified by observation:
Foam
Observed Foaming
Description
Tendencies
None
Normal frying
Trace foam
First indication of foam
Slight foam
Foam severity increases
Definite foam
Definite pockets of foam
Persistent foam
Foam persists until the food is removed from the fryer
Any of these indicators can be used successfully to identify the discard point when it is correlated with the frying operation to serve as a reliable indicator of the condition of the used fat. Some operators replace their frying shortening after a prescribed time or after a specific quantity of food has been fried. This practice cannot provide a uniform product quality even when the discard point is for good-quality frying shortening, which has a negative impact on economics and eliminates the incentives to improve the performance of the frying shortening. Even though the choices of frying shortenings have changed over time, the foodservice industry still has the same basic selection criteria: flavor, mouth feel, frying stability, texture, handling, cost and nutrition. The nutritional concerns have evolved from cholesterol and saturated fatty acids to include trans fatty acids and a lack of omega-3 fatty acids. Inclusion of the omega-3 fatty acids into frying shortenings would be counterproductive for all of the selection criteria including nutrition. The polyunsaturated omega-3 fatty acids are more susceptible to polymerization and trans fatty acid development than any other fatty acid group. Those effecting transfree reformulation efforts must also be especially cognizant of the polyunsaturated fatty acid content to maintain the frying stability of the various frying shortenings. Trans isomers of unsaturated fatty acids are formed during various processes, including biohydrogenation in ruminant animals, catalytic hydrogenation, and heat treatment of fats and oils.14 Therefore, frying shortenings must be formulated to be trans fatty acid free initially and to resist isomerization of the unsaturated fatty acids during the frying process. Alternative techniques, applicable to frying shortenings, to eliminate and prevent trans fatty acid development during frying are: (a) formulate with naturally stable fats and oils, (b) use of trait-enhanced oils, (c) use of modification processes that do not create trans fatty acids, (d) lower temperature
Frying Shortenings
409
deodorization, and (e) formulate with fat and oil products that resist isomerization during heating in the fryer. Some guidelines for the development of trans-free frying shortenings include:16 • High monounsaturated fatty acid (C-18:1) content: 65% highest optimal level recommended for best fried-in flavor.17 • Limit linoleic fatty acid (C-18:2) to 15% or less: This level should provide the flavor-producing breakdown products for the desired fried-in flavor.17 • Limit long chain unsaturated fatty acids, C-18:3 and higher, to less than 1.5%: The main isomers formed due to fryer type heating are the trans fatty acids of C-18:2 and C-18:3. The probability of C-18:3 isomerization is 12 to 14 times higher than that of C-18:2 fatty acid.13 • Limit saturated fatty acids to as low as possible to achieve the desired functionality both for frying stability and other finished product attributes such as glaze, icing, and sugar adherence or use interesterification to modify the fat solids profile. • Utilize modification processes that do not create trans fatty acids: Fractionation and trait-enhanced oils are probably the most applicable modification processes for the production of frying shortenings. Interesterification may be necessary for heavy-duty frying shortenings to utilize the frying stability provided by the saturated fatty acids and still maintain acceptable eating characteristics.
Because each foodservice operation is unique as to its menu, product mix, equipment, and operation, fats and oils processors must produce more than one frying shortening to meet the performance expectations. Four general types of plasticized foodservice frying shortenings are produced in addition to the specialized or tailormade product for specific customers: all-purpose shortenings, animal–vegetable blends, liquid and heavy-duty, all-vegetable frying shortenings. 7.4.1 Foodservice All-Purpose Shortening All-purpose shortenings are compromise products designed for performance in baking and frying. All-purpose shortenings can be formulated with 3 to 15% essentially fully saturated β′ hardfats added to a soft partially hydrogenated basestock, a blend of tallow with vegetable oil, interesterified lard, or an interesterified basestock blended with liquid oil. Some fats and oils processors add low levels of dimethylpolysiloxane to all-purpose shortenings to improve the frying stability. The antifoamer level must be kept low, probably 0.5 ppm or less, to maintain creaming properties for cake, icing, cookie, and other baked product production. All-purpose shortenings were the first plastic shortenings used for frying and have a better frying stability than most oil products, but less than shortenings formulated especially for frying. Additionally, shortenings produce a dry fried product appearance, contributed by a melting point of 105 to 120°F (40.6 to 48.9°C), instead of the oily appearance contributed by liquid oils. Restaurant kitchens that bake and only deep-fat fry occasionally may choose to use an all-purpose shortening to reduce the number of products inventoried. Trans-free all-purpose shortenings formulated with an interesterified basestock composed of hardfat and a highly polyunsaturated liquid oil blended with a highly
410
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
polyunsaturated liquid oil for solids fat control cannot have the frying stability of a product composed of hydrogenated basestocks blended with hardfat for solids control. The polyunsaturated liquid oil portions of the trans-free products are susceptible to oxidation, polymerization, and isomerization during the frying process. The use of more stable oils, such as cottonseed, corn, or a trait enhanced oil with a desirable fatty acid profile will increase both frying stability and resistance to isomerization and still provide acceptable baking performance. 7.4.2 Animal–Vegetable Blended Frying Shortening Animal fats and blends with vegetable oils have been used as frying shortenings for many years. These products have been attractive to frying operations due to usually low initial cost, good frying stability, and the preference of some consumers for the meaty flavor transferred to the fried foods. A large market did exist for a blend of undeodorized tallow with refined, bleached, and deodorized (RBD) cottonseed oil for frying French fries. This product was produced with good-quality, causticrefined tallow blended with about 10% cottonseed oil to depress the melting point. The characteristic tallow flavor was complemented by the “nutty” flavor contributed by the liquid cottonseed oil to impart a distinctive flavor to French fries. Tallow has a natural resistance to oxidation and polymerization contributed by its high saturated and oleic fatty acid content. The use of meat-fat frying shortenings in restaurants has decreased dramatically due to nutritional concerns and pressure from special interest groups. Most foodservice operators that utilized meat fats or blends for frying have changed to cholesterol-free, all-vegetable frying shortenings; however, a steam distillation process to strip meat fats of cholesterol has been developed so that they can be reconsidered as frying shortenings.18 7.4.3 Heavy-Duty Vegetable Frying Shortenings All-vegetable frying shortenings were among the first shortenings specifically formulated for a particular function. These shortenings, often referred to as heavy duty, are processed for maximum frying stability using the hydrogenation process to render them resistant to oxidative changes during the frying operation. Neither plasticity nor creaming properties are important for frying shortenings because the product is melted for use. Therefore, specific crystal types are not a prerequisite, and most source oils can be hydrogenated for frying shortening performance. Most heavy-duty frying shortenings are composed of selectively hydrogenated soybean oil or another source oil that is usually determined by economics and availability. Selective hydrogenation is utilized to provide high solids at the low temperatures that drop off rapidly to provide a good mouth feel for the fried food when eaten. Saturation of linolenic and linoleic fatty acids to predominately oleic and trans fatty acids substantially increases the frying stability of the shortening by removing the opportunities for oxidation. Dimethylpolysiloxane, the antifoaming agent, is added by all processors, and some also add the antioxidant TBHQ to protect the product before addition to the frying kettle, as well as for carry-through protection for the
Frying Shortenings
411
fried foods. Plasticization conditions are controlled to provide a uniform consistency, and the product does not require tempering after filling. Plasticized frying shortenings are ready to ship to the customer after the product has solidified enough to palletize or stack properly. These shortenings offer economy to the frying operation by providing good-quality fried foods over an extended frying period. Unfortunately, the performance of the traditional heavy-duty frying shortening is heavily related to the trans fatty acid content provided by selective hydrogenation. Efforts to identify replacements for the high trans frying shortening require the utilization of a different modification process and reformulation of the individual components. A typical heavy duty frying shortening has ~25% saturates, ~70% oleic, and <5% linoleic fatty acids. Blends of 80 to 85% of a high-oleic trait enhanced oils with 15 to 20% of a fully saturated oilseed oil or palm stearine should mimic the fatty acid composition of the hydrogenated heavy-duty frying shortening and random interesterification should reconfigure the triglyceride compositions to provide a desirable fat solids profile. Some other potential trans-free options include the use of individual high-oleic, trait-enhanced oils, whole palm oil, or palm olein. 7.4.4 Liquid Frying Shortenings Liquid opaque frying shortening, introduced in the late 1950s, appeared to be a contradiction to frying technology that correlated frying stability with saturation to eliminate the reaction sites for oxidation. The liquid product had a milky appearance and could be poured from the container like a salad or cooking oil, and it had a better frying stability than the best heavy-duty or animal/vegetable frying shortenings, even though its composition was high in polyunsaturates. The secret to the superior frying stability of the liquid shortening was dimethylpolysiloxane. The addition of this antifoamer effectively retarded oxidation and polymerization to more than double the frying life of the best heavy-duty plasticized frying shortening available at the time, which relied on hydrogenation for stability. The opaque liquid shortening enjoyed this supremacy over all other frying shortenings until the antifoaming agent was added to their competition. This addition returned the heavyduty frying shortening to the most stable frying shortening status, but liquid frying shortening had gained a following with foodservice operators because of the convenience of a pourable product, the respectable frying stability, and a slightly oilier fried food appearance. Many foodservice operations also prefer the relatively high level of unsaturation, and low trans fatty acid content, which may be important for nutritional considerations. Two types of liquid frying shortenings have evolved since their introduction: the original opaque-type product and a competitive product that is clear at room temperature. Opaque liquid frying shortenings are usually formulated with 2 to 6% of a β-crystal forming hardfat in 100- to 110-IV (iodine value) partially hydrogenated soybean oil. The opaque liquid shortenings must be crystallized carefully to stabilize the hard fractions to maintain a pourable consistency. The clear liquid frying shortenings are hydrogenated and then fractionated to provide the high-stability translucent product at room temperature. Winterization facilities can be used to fractionate
412
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 7.1 Foodservice Liquid Frying Shortenings Comparison Analytical Characteristics
Opaque
Clear
10–11
8.5–9.5
6–8
3.5–4.0
C-18:1 Oleic
42–46
61–65
C-18:2 Linoleic
31–37
20–24
C-18:3 Linolenic
2–3
0.2–1.5
101–107
88–94
10.0°C/50°F
3–7
5–14
21.1°C/70°F
3–6
0.2–0.7
26.7°C/80°F
3–6
—
33.3°C/92°F
2–6
—
40.0°C/104°F
0.5–5
—
Fatty acid composition, % C-16:0 Palmitic C-18:0 Stearic
Iodine value Solids fat index
a ±88-IV hydrogenated soybean oil to obtain a liquid fraction with a ±92 IV. The clear liquid frying shortenings obviously do not require crystallization, but exposure to temperatures below the chill-room temperature of 65°F (18.3°C) will cause crystallization of this product. Frying stability of the clear liquid frying shortenings is slightly better than the opaque liquid frying shortening, but the difference is usually indistinguishable by the foodservice operator. The comparison of physical characteristics of the two types of liquid shortening in Table 7.1 illustrates the differences in fatty acid composition and SFI profiles, which influence the appearance and frying stability differences. Trans-free liquid shortenings formulation involves the replacement of the partially hydrogenated basestock with either a naturally stable product, such as cottonseed or peanut oils or a low-linolenic trait-enhanced oil. Liquid shortenings will develop trans fatty acids during frying due to the necessity of a higher unsaturated fatty acid level to maintain liquidity. For optimum frying stability and isomerization resistance, C-18:3 and longer chain polyunsaturates must be avoided and linoleic (C-18:2) fatty acids limited. 7.4.5 Trait-Enhanced Vegetable Oils One area where health considerations and functionality appear to coexist is frying with high-oleic, fatty acid oils. These genetically modified oils (GMOs) with high monounsaturate levels have the healthful aspects of low saturates and no trans fatty acids while still providing the oxidative stability normally achieved through partial hydrogenation. The high-oleic variations appear to be some of the most promising replacements for hydrogenated oils used in foodservice frying. Some flavor researchers have observed that some of the characteristic frying flavors contributed
Frying Shortenings
413
Table 7.2 GMO High-Oleic Sunflower Oil Frying Evaluation Heavy
Liquid
High-Oleic
Duty
Frying
Sunflower
Shortening
Shortening
Oil
Iodine value
68.5 ± 1.5
107 ± 2.0
85.0 ± 5.0
Mettler melting point, °C
41.5 ± 1.0
31.0 min
4.4 ± —
Product Profile
Solids fat index 10.0°C/50°F
50.0 ± 3.0
5.0 max
21.1°C/70°F
42.5 ± 3.0
—
—
26.7°C/80°F
29.0 ± 3.0
3.0 max
—
33.3°C/92°F
13.0 ± 2.0
—
—
40.0°C/104°F
3.5 ± 1.5
0.4 min
—
200+
40 min
65 ± 5
AOM stability, hours Fatty acid composition, % C-16:0 Palmitic
10.8
10.8
3.7
C-18:0 Stearic
14.8
6.2
5.4
C-18:1 Oleic
70.5t
43.4t
81.3
C-18:2 Linoleic
3.9t
36.9t
9.0
C-18:3 Linolenic
—
t
2.7
—
39.5
15.9
nil
Trans-isomer, % Additives, ppm Dimethylpolysiloxane TBHQ
2
2
50
50
249
169
2 —
Frying test results Resistance to: Foaming, hours
216
Free fatty acid, hours
93
100
90
Darkening, hours
98
74
101
Off-flavor, hours
225
38
158
166
95
141
Average hours
Notes: GMO = genetically modified oil; AOM = active oxygen method; min = minimum; max = maximum; t = trans included.
by breakdown of the more unsaturated fatty acids are missing in oils containing more than 65% oleic fatty acids;17 however, the heavy-duty frying shortening used extensively in restaurants contains approximately 70% oleic fatty acids and a lower level of the more unsaturated fatty acids than the GMO oils with 80% oleic fatty acid. Another theory is that hydrogenation provides flavor notes associated with fried foods.19 The results of frying tests comparing high-oleic sunflower oil to a heavy-duty frying shortening and a liquid frying shortening are presented in Table 7.2.20 These results indicate that the resistance to off-flavor development of the high-oleic frying oil was slightly inferior to the heavy-duty frying shortening, but vastly superior
414
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
to the liquid frying shortening. It had a resistance to free fatty acid and darkening equivalent to the heavy-duty shortening, but was 15 to 25% less resistant to foaming and off-flavors. 7.5 FOODSERVICE PAN and GRILL SHORTENINGS Griddle and pan-frying are major foodservice breakfast preparation methods. It has been estimated that 75 to 80% of all U.S. breakfast menu items are prepared on a grill or in a frying pan. In recent years, many fast-food chains have increased sales volume and profits by adding a breakfast menu. This has enabled them to make more efficient use of their restaurants for reduced overall costs. Any cooking oil, unemulsified shortening, margarine, or butter can be used for pan and grill frying. Butter or margarine have been the choice of many chefs for their butter flavor and color contributions to the fried product; however, both require careful, low-temperature preparation to avoid scorching the milk solids, and the moisture content causes spattering and the food to stick to the hot metal surface. Salad oils would seem to be the logical solution to the moisture and milk solids problems, but they tend to polymerize rapidly on the hot surface and create unsightly gums, and the food still sticks to the pan or grill unless the surfaces are properly seasoned after each cleaning. Seasoning a pan or grill is accomplished by carefully building up thin layers of polymerized oil to fill in the metal pores until a slick, firm surface is created. Unemulsified shortening would appear to be a logical solution to the gum problem with liquid oils, as it has been hydrogenated for a better resistance to polymerization. All-purpose shortening does resist gumming, but the food still sticks to the hot surface if the pan is not seasoned after cleaning. Many chefs solved the sticking, gumming, spattering, scorching, and surface preparation problems by clarifying either butter or margarine and using the oil portion for grilling or pan frying. The separated oil contains a buttery color and flavor, it does not spatter excessively, and the food does not stick to the hot surface. The natural emulsifier in butter, which is added as lecithin to margarine, functions as an antisticking agent. Because lecithin is oil soluble, the clarified butter or margarine oil contains this antisticking agent. Clarification of either butter or margarine results in at least 25% waste. In addition, the butter flavor of margarine does not carry through to the fried foods to any appreciable extent. This situation provided an ideal specialty product development project for fats and oils processors. The fast-food chains added urgency to this development because of their desires to produce the same product quality in hundreds of units. Obviously, clarification of butter or margarine did not fit into the fast-food quality commitments, especially with their high turnover of kitchen personnel. Foodservice operators have readily accepted pan and grill shortenings, which are butter flavored and colored with lecithin as an antisticking agent. These products have proved to be more than adequate specialty-product replacements for butter, margarine, or cooking oils previously used for grilling and pan-frying. Table 7.3 reviews the three general types of pan and grill shortenings available: two liquids and a solid.
Frying Shortenings
415
Table 7.3 Pan and Grill Shortenings Consistency Usual Source Oils
Pourable
Salted Pourable
Solid
Soybean oil
Soybean oil
Coconut oil, palm kernel oil, soybean oil, cottonseed oil
Solids Fat Index 10.0°C/50°F
3.0–7.0
3.0–7.0
20.0–30.0
21.1°C/70°F
3.0–6.0
3.0–6.0
8.0–20.0
26.7°C/80°F
3.0–6.0
3.0–6.0
5.0–15.0
33.3°C/92°F
2.0–6.0
2.0–6.0
1.0–5.0
40.0°C/104°F
0.5–5.0
0.5–5.0
0
seasoning, basting, popcorn, soup, grilling, corn-onthe-cob, seafood dip, sauces, gravies, pan frying
bun toaster oil, bun dressing, pan frying, corn-onthe-cob, grilling
Applications
pan frying, grilling, soups, sauces, gravies, basting, brush-on dressing, corn-on-the-cob
Common Ingredients
lecithin, artificial color, butter flavor, dimethylpolysiloxane, antioxidants
The distinguishing difference between the two liquid types is the addition of salt. Salt enhances the butter flavor to give this product a more pleasing stand-alone flavor, making it more closely duplicate the flavor of clarified butter or margarine. The finely milled salt added to the liquid pan and grill shortening can only be dispersed because it is not soluble in oil. Usually, the salt is dispersed in the pan and grill shortening after it has been crystallized, just prior to packaging, to minimize the abrasive action of undissolved salt on chilling equipment and pumps. Lecithin is added to all the products to provide antisticking properties and prevent spattering during frying. Both the salted and salt-free liquid products are formulated like opaque frying shortenings with a soft soybean oil basestock and a soybean oil hardfat, usually the same formulation as for liquid frying shortenings. The antifoamer, dimethylpolysiloxane, is added to counteract some of the foaming produced by lecithin in pan-frying and as an antioxidant. Solid pan and grill shortenings usually contain coconut or palm kernel oils with either palm oil or hydrogenated soybean and/or cottonseed oil. The palm oil formulation would have a low trans fatty acid content. The function of the lauric oil addition is to provide a sharp melt and to promote foaming and oxidative stability. The foaming action complements lecithin to provide antisticking and antispattering properties. Stability is more important for the solid pan and grill products because the usual kitchen procedure is to keep a container of melted product on the grill or stove instead of waiting for the product to melt before each food preparation. Additionally, the solid pan and grill products perform better in bun and toaster applications where a reservoir of melted product is maintained. Liquid products polymerize and require constant attention to prevent service interruptions. The colors and flavors utilized for
416
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
all pan and grill shortenings must be heat stable, but more so for the solid products because of the longer heating periods. 7.6 BAKERY FRYING SHORTENING APPLICATIONS Bakery deep-fat fried products consist of several hundred varieties, but can be classified into three general classifications: (1) yeast raised, (2) chemically leavened or cake, and (3) fried pies or pastries. The frying methods for all three classifications may be either surface frying, which requires turning the product approximately half way through the frying procedure, or submerged frying, where the dough pieces are held beneath the surface of the frying fat during most of the frying cycle. Almost all of the fried products may also be subjected to various finishing or coating techniques to apply toppings or fillings. In many cases, the product attributes must be modified to accommodate the toppings or application methods. The toppings utilized include (1) fluid topping, such as glazes and enrobing icings; (2) dry coatings, such as powdered, granulated, or cinnamon sugar; and (3) combinations of the fluid and dry coatings, which involve the application of a liquid coating followed by sprinkling or tumbling with a dry coating. The fillings are either injected after frying or incorporated during the product make-up. Fillings include cinnamon sugar, fruits, jellies, crèmes, marshmallow, etc. The three types of fried bakery products may be produced in various shapes, subjected to various coatings or topping products, and filled with many different products to produce literally hundreds of different varieties. Bakery frying shortenings have three distinct functions: (1) heat transfer medium, (2) major ingredient in the finished product, and (3) binder for casings, such as glazes and sugars. Table 7.4 demonstrates the effect on bakery-fried products of solids-to-liquid ratios of frying shortening. All-vegetable or meat-fat-based Table 7.4 Bakery Frying Shortening Solids Fat Index Affect Solids Fat Index
Characteristic
Solids/Liquid
Affected
Characteristic Effect
Temperature
Value
10.0°C/50°F
33–38
Shelf life
Solids create a barrier to keep moisture inside the donut
21.1°C/70°F
21–26
Appearance and Eating Quality
High solids values leave a visible layer of fat on the donut, promoting a waxy mouthfeel and flaking of a sugar coating. Low solids values produce oily crusts, which cause oil soakage of sugar coatings.
26.7°C/80°F and 33.3°C/92°F
19–24
Sugar Pickup
The correct ratio of hard to soft fractions in the frying shortening help to ensure proper sugar pickup. High solids = poor sugar adherence Low solids = sugar oil soakage
40.0°C/104°F
7–12
Eating Quality
Frying shortening solids values above body temperature adversely affect eating quality. Solids values at 104°F above 12% usually cause a waxy, unpleasant mouthfeel.
12–17
Frying Shortenings
417
shortenings perform adequately for this application, and the same general SFI requirements are applicable for either fat or oil source utilization. The same transfree alternatives advocated for foodservice all-purpose frying shortenings with adjustments to conform to the SFI/SFC limits apply to bakery frying shortenings. However, the crystal habit provided by the source oils utilized has an effect for some of the bakery operations. Crystallization, or set time, required for the absorbed shortening to solidify to the desired degree will vary with crystal types. ß′-crystal-tending products set up more quickly than β-crystal shortenings, thus it may be desirable to choose the frying shortening source oils or at least the hardfat portion to develop a crystal type that complies with an operational time requirement for solidification for acceptable sugar or glaze adherence. Bakery frying shortenings normally do not contain dimethylpolysiloxane because of the adverse effect of the antifoamer on the performance of the fried products: • Dimethylpolysiloxane-treated frying shortenings have apparently defoamed cake donut batters at the surface to produce a deformed donut. • Glaze and sugar retention problems have been attributed to the use of dimethylpolysiloxane in frying shortenings. • Increased fat absorption with antifoamer-treated shortenings has been attributed to the maintenance of a low frying-fat viscosity for longer periods.
Conveniently, the high absorption of bakery-fried products coupled with the demands that allow continuous frying provides a high turnover rate. In most cases, the turnover rate is high enough that properly cared for frying shortening should never have to be discarded, hence, the antifoamer additive is not required for bakery shortenings. Normally, fresh frying shortenings do not produce the desired fried characteristics for bakery-fried products until after a “break-in” period. Because bakery-frying shortening normally has a high turnover rate due to the type of frying and the rather high absorption rate of the fried foods, the bakery products are developed to be fried in a frying shortening that has been used and has experienced a degree of change from a fresh shortening. The desired frying shortening condition has been called the quality period, during which the donuts produced have the preferred shape, appearance, absorbed fat, and eating character. This point has been thought to correlate with the presence of free fatty acids; however, no particular free fatty acid level has been identified. In fact, different researchers have identified a different ideal free fatty acid level depending on the oxidative stability of the shortening product. It is more likely that the ideal frying shortening condition is dependent on the amount of polymerization. The fresh shortening that is added to the frying kettle to compensate for the fat that is removed by absorption helps overcome the changes caused by heat and other factors. 7.6.1 Cake Donut Shortenings Dictionaries define a donut as being a small, ring-shaped cake fried in deep fat, made of either (1) a rich batter leavened with baking powder called cake donuts, or
418
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
(2) yeast-leavened dough (in which case they are called raised donuts). No other fresh bakery product has as many possible varieties, except perhaps cookies. Donuts are produced commercially by retail bakeries, grocery in-store bakeries, and wholesale bakeries, as well as specialty donut shops. It has been estimated that donuts, both cake and yeast-raised combined, account for as much as 10% of the total bakery product category. Cake donuts are different from other products prepared in bakeries in three major respects:21 • No container is used to determine shape. A cake donut is a free-flowing block of dough floating in the frying fat. The characteristics of the batter and how fast it sets and seals controls the total symmetry of the cake donut. • The entire preparation is compressed into a very short period of time. The frying time for a typical donut is 30 to 45 seconds on each side at 375°F (190.6°C). • Up to 25% of the final product composition is added during the heating process (i.e., the frying shortening).
Most bakeries use cake-donut mixes instead of preparing them from scratch primarily because they are one of the most sensitive products with respect to formulation and ingredients. Prepared mix suppliers test each ingredient, especially the flour, to determine the formula modifications necessary to produce quality cake donuts. Flour for cake donuts is performance tested to make a product that offers proper water absorption, shortening absorption, specific volume, height, spread, and several other overall performance characteristics. The amount of shortening and the emulsifiers in the mix are controlling factors for fat absorption along with the milk level for the mix formulation and floor time, mix time, water level, and batter temperature during make-up. Oils are generally used in the production of cakedonut mixes. Plastic or solid shortenings provide a cake donut with a very rough, coarse crust. Oil produces a cake donut with a smooth crust and a lower shortening absorption level. Cake-donut mixes normally will contain mono- and diglyceride emulsifiers alone or in combination with an intermediate-hardness propylene glycol monoester at a level of no more than 0.5% of the total mix. The purpose of the emulsifiers is to control shortening absorption, extend shelf life, and tenderize to provide a shorter bite. Lecithin is almost always incorporated into cake-donut mixes to act as a wetting agent and for the desired batter flow characteristics. Lecithin helps the cake-donut batter flow uniformly to the center to assist in making a uniform formation resembling a star. The typical fat content of a cake donut will be 20 to 25% total extractable fat. Of this range, which is necessary for good eating quality, 16 to 20% of it is absorbed frying shortening. In addition to enhancing eating quality, it has another important function — it is the mechanism or glue to hold donut-coating sugar onto the surface of the donut. Typically, donuts to be sugar-coated are cooled to a surface temperature of 90 to 95°F (32.2 to 35.0°C) before actual contact with the donut sugar in a tumbler. Donut-coating sugar mixes are prepared with dextrose (corn sugar), starch, shortening, and small amounts of other ingredients, such as salt and flavor. The shortening utilized in a sugar donut usually has a flat SFI profile typically ranging from 16 to 20% solids at 50°F (10°C) down to 4 to 6% at 104°F (40°C).
Frying Shortenings
419
The process for preparing sugar-coating mixes is based on encapsulation techniques for protecting the sugars from moisture and fat penetration. A typical donut tumbler resembles a 55-gallon steel drum laid on its side at a slight pitch, with a perforated inner drum where the donuts and sugar mix tumble. The sugar is held on the surface of the donut by the liquid fraction of the frying shortening, thus the SFI profile and the crystallization rate of the frying shortening are extremely important. Shortenings with slow crystallization rates have excellent sugar pickup, but migrate through the coating sugar within 5 to 10 minutes to create brown, unappealing oil spots on the surface of the sugared donut. Low frying shortening SFI values at sugaring temperature and below result in excellent fat migration, and the donut will have an oily, greasy mouth feel. Alternately, excessively high frying shortening SFI values result in poor donut sugar pickup and waxy eating characteristics. The typical bakery frying shortening SFI profile presented in Table 7.4 applies to cake donuts as well as the other bakery-fried products. Fortunately, for bakery production, one shortening can be used for frying and as an ingredient in the product formula. 7.6.2 Yeast-Raised Fried Products Yeast-raised fried products are basically lean, yeast-raised sweet doughs. Raised donuts are the most recognized variety for this classification of bakery fried products. Other varieties within this classification include honey buns, fried cinnamon rolls, bismarks, long johns, etc. All of these bakery-fried products are made from a sweet dough fermented with yeast to obtain the leavening action or expansion. After being fermented, the doughs may be sheeted to the desired height and cut into donut or other shapes. Alternative make-up methods include air-pressure cutting or extrusion. After proofing, the yeast-raised products are fried and finished with various toppings or fillings. Glazed, raised donuts are the most widely known and popular yeast-raised fried product. Shortening functions as a tenderizer in a yeast-raised fried product mix. Generally, plastic sweet yeast-dough shortenings are used for the raised donut doughs and the other products in this fried-food classification. These shortenings contain emulsifiers for dough conditioning and shelf-life extension. The addition of lecithin is purported to condition the crust of yeast-raised donuts for better glaze retention after frying.22 Bakery-frying fats have traditionally been chosen with a fairly high melting point to accommodate glazing and sugaring requirements. Some bakeries even adjust the melting point with hardfat additions in the summer to compensate for higher operating and distribution temperatures. The eating characteristics of bakery-fried products are complemented by a slightly high melting character, which provides a pleasant, creamy mouth feel. 7.6.3 Fried-Pie Shortenings A fried pie is a crispy, fruit-filled, fried pastry usually made in a semicircle or oblong rectangular shape and glazed. The fried pie should not be viewed as being the same as a baked fruit pie. The most obvious difference is that the baked pie has
420
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
a pan to support it during manufacture and distribution and until it is eaten by the consumer. The crust of the fried pie serves as the container, thus it must have enough strength to hold the product together during production, distribution, and consumption. Still, the crust must be tender enough to provide a satisfactory eating quality. The fried-pie crust formula utilized is generally a lean pie crust type with approximately 25 to 35% shortening on a flour basis or 15 to 20% on a total basis. The doughs are mixed at a relatively warm temperature and long enough to uniformly distribute the ingredients and obtain a degree of flour gluten development. The pie crust is sheeted to approximately 1/8-inch thickness and cut into the desired shape, and the filling is deposited in the center. The overlapping half of the dough is laid over the top of the filling, trimmed, and sealed. Improper sealing of the fried pie will cause breakouts during frying, which contaminate the frying shortening. After sealing, the fried pie is deep-fat fried using the submerged method for four to six minutes at 375 to 380°F (190.6 to 193.3°C). Immediately after frying, some fried pies have a glaze applied similar to yeast-raised donuts. Two shortenings are utilized in the production of fried pies: the shortening used to prepare the pie crust and the frying shortening. The shortening utilized in the crust can be the same as that used for baked pie doughs or a standard all-purpose shortening. Fried pies are successfully fried in the same bakery-frying shortenings utilized for the yeast-raised and cake-donut products; however, the shortenings used to fry the pies may require more maintenance to remove contaminants from the fried pies themselves. 7.7 SNACK FRYING SHORTENING applications Potato chips, corn chips, tortilla chips, pork skins, puffed snacks, and similar products are fried and packaged for consumption within two to three months after preparation. Frying shortenings are a crucial element in the finished quality and, therefore, consumer acceptance of the fried snacks, which utilize more than 10% of the fats and oils available in the United States.23 The selection of snack frying oils is influenced by a number of factors, including the product being fried, equipment design, flavor and eating characteristics desired, shelf life requirements, and historic usage. Deep-fat-fried snacks are first dehydrated by the heat-transfer medium, which concentrates the flavors of the snack, and then the media become a major component of the snack. Absorbed frying oils in the spaces vacated by moisture contribute to texture, flavor, eating characteristics, and appearance of the fried snack. Most fried snack products have high fat absorption rates on the order of 30 to 45%, which makes the frying media an important ingredient for these products. The frying fat usage is very high in most snack processing plants. Frying fat is absorbed rapidly by the high production rates and is constantly replenished with added fresh fat, which minimizes frying-fat deterioration. Snack-frying shortenings are not abused as much as restaurant or bakery frying shortenings because of the extremely high turnover rate, continuous frying, and controls exercised over frying temperatures, fat replenishment, etc. In snack frying,
Frying Shortenings
421
deterioration of the frying shortening is reflected in the finished snack. The longer a frying oil is used, the greater the decrease in oil quality, which results in a lower shelf life. It has been estimated that corn chips fried in peanut oil at 400°F (204.4°C) with a 40-hour AOM stability and a 4- to 5-hour turnover rate should have a shelf life of more than 90 days at 70 to 80°F (21.1 to 26.7°C) before becoming rancid.24 Rancidity is the stage in fat oxidation characterized by the development of easily recognized sharp, acrid, and pungent off-flavors and odors. The choice of snack-frying shortening is influenced by flavor, mouth feel, texture, product appearance, and snack type. The fried-snack finish or appearance will be oilier with a frying shortening that is a liquid at room temperature and drier or grayer with higher degrees of saturation. Liquid oils tend to provide a quicker flavor release, whereas high-melting products tend to impart gummy textures, which mask or slow the flavor release. All of the frying shortenings used are processed to be neutral or bland in flavor, but their presence in the snack product enhances the flavor of the product, which is sometimes described as a cooked flavor or effect; however, the flavor of the snack food can be diluted and diminished by using all fresh frying oil. Snack-frying oils do not reach equilibrium until after four turnovers in most frying operations.25 Snack-frying shortenings are usually limited to vegetable oils, except for the lard used to fry animal products, such as pork skins. The additives used in snack-frying shortenings are antioxidants, chelating acids, and dimethylpolysiloxane. BHA, BHT, and TBHQ are the antioxidants most utilized for snack foods. The phenolic antioxidants protect the oils from oxidation during shipment and storage between the processor and the fryer where they are apparently destroyed by the high frying temperatures. Nevertheless, test results have shown a carry-through protection for snack products fried in shortenings containing antioxidants,23 and TBHQ appears to be the most effective.11 Dimethylpolysiloxane is added to frying shortenings designed for restaurant use to retard foaming, but snack-frying oils should not require an antifoamer because of the rapid turnovers experienced. However, dimethylpolysiloxane also offers oxidative protection during frying by forming a barrier that prevents penetration of oxygen into the oil.7 Weiss26 recommends that dimethylpolysiloxane not be used for potato chip frying because of an adverse affect on the texture of the finished chip. This result may have been caused by the mechanical pickup of excess dimethylpolysiloxane from the frying shortening. Antifoamer concentrations above 1 ppm will quickly adhere to any available surface.7 Citric acid is added by the frying shortening processor to chelate metals that accelerate oxidation; this addition is in the cooling tray of the deodorizer and again possibly with an antioxidant mixture after deodorization. Phosphoric acid should not be used as a chelating agent for frying oils. It causes a catalytic reaction to increase fatty acid development and darkening. The extent to which the melting point of the frying shortening affects food palatability depends on the temperature range at which the food will be eaten and the amount of fat absorption. For high-fat products that are consumed at room temperature, snack food processors prefer liquid or low melting frying shortenings with a low degree of saturation. Lightly hydrogenated soybean oil was the most attractive snack-frying medium for quality and economics, but has been replaced due to
422
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
nutritional concerns, that is, trans fatty acids. Many potato chip manufacturers have used RBD cottonseed oil for frying their products because of its stability compared to other oils and the characteristic “nutty” flavor developed with oxidation. Some other snack food manufactures use peanut oil for the same reasons: peanut oil is an oxidatively stable oil and reverts to a peanut flavor with oxidation. NuSun®, a hybrid sunflower oil with 50 to 65% oleic fatty acid along with a low saturated fatty acid content, was developed especially for the snack frying industry. This oil is nutritionally more acceptable than most of the other frying media and the high-oleic, fatty acid content will provide oxidative stability. The mid-level linoleic fatty acid content should provide the fried-in flavor found lacking in the high-oleic, fatty acid oils when used for frying. A universal snack-frying shortening does not exist. Most snack food processors have specifications for their frying medium that they have developed either independently or with their suppliers’ assistance. These frying shortenings differ among the snack food processors, depending on the product produced and processors’ perceptions of their customers’ preferences. 7.7.1 Nut Meats Oil Roasting Peanuts, pecans, almonds, Brazil nuts, and other nut meats are oil roasted as a snack food as well as for use in candies, salads, deserts, etc. In oil roasting, the nuts are dehydrated and a browning reaction occurs throughout the nut to change the texture, appearance, and flavor. Nut meats have relatively low moisture levels (typically 5%), but high oil contents. As a result, absorption levels for fried nuts are very low, only about 3 to 5%. Even at high production rates with continuous frying, the frying fat turnover rate will not match even the low restaurant-frying shortening replacement levels. Therefore, the frying stability and the oxidative stability of the frying shortening are very important attributes during and after the frying process. Coconut oil has been the frying medium of choice for most nut fryers. It resists oxidation because of a high saturated-fat content and has a sharp melting point below body temperature, but is solid at room temperature for good salt adherence. Hydrolysis is less of a problem with the lauric oils due to the low moisture contents of the nut meats. Some nuts are fried in liquid oils, such as peanut oil, cottonseed oil, and liquid frying shortenings, but these oils have limited frying and oxidative stability. Traitenhanced high-oleic oils have a better oxidative stability, but not to the extent of the lauric oils. Selectively hydrogenated domestic oils with melting points below body temperature and long oxidative stability were the closest substitute or replacement for coconut oils for nut oil roasting. REFERENCES
1. Robertson, C.J., The principals of deep-fat frying for the bakery, The Baker’s Digest, 40(10), 54–57, 1966.
Frying Shortenings
423
2. Stevenson, S.G., Vaisey-Genser, M., and Eskin, N.A.M., Quality control in the use of deep frying oils, JAOCS, 61, 1102–1108, 1984. 3. Rock, S.P. and Roth, H., Factors affecting the rate of deterioration in the frying qualities of fats. I. Exposure to air, JAOCS, 41, 228–230, 1964. 4. Brooker, S.G., Frying fats, part 2, Food Technol. New Zealand, 10(5), 19–21, 1975. 5. Martin, J.B., U.S. Patent 2,634,213, 1953. 6. Babayan, V.K., U.S. Patent 2,998,319, 1961. 7. Freeman, I.P., Padley, F.B., and Sheppard, W.L., Use of silicones in frying oils, JAOCS, 50, 101–103, 1973. 8. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Volume 3, Part 173, Section 340, Revised April 1, 2006, Washington, D.C. 9. Weiss, T.J., Chemical adjuncts, in Food Oils and Their Uses, 2nd ed., AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1983, pp. 112–113. 10. Chrysam, M.M., Tablespreads and shortenings, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 3, Applewhite, T.H., Ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1985, p. 114. 11. Buck, D.F., Antioxidants in soya oil, JAOCS, 58, 277–278, 1981. 12. Warner, C.R. et al., Fate of antioxidants and antioxidant-deprived products in deep-fat frying and cookie baking, J. Agric. Food Chem., 34(1), 1–5, 1986. 13. Henon, G. et al., Deodorization of vegetable oils, Part 1: Modeling the geometrical isomerization of polyunsaturated fatty acids, JAOCS, 76, 73, 1999. 14. Sebedlo, A., Grandgirard, A., and Prevost, J., Linolenic acid isomers in heat-treated sunflower oils, JAOCS, 65, 367–368, 1988. 15. Ovesen, L., Leth, T., and Hansen, K., Fatty acid composition and contents or trans monounsaturated ftty acids in frying fats, and in margarines and shortenings marketed in Denmark, JAOCS, 75, 1079–1083, 1998. 16. Kochhar, S. P., Stable and healthful frying oil for the 21st century, INFORM, 11, 642–647, 2000. 17. Neff, J., Fat city for fat research, Food Process. Mag., February 1988, p. 34. 18. Haumann, B.R., The goal, tastier and “healthier” fried foods, INFORM, 7, 320–334, 1996. 19. Tiffany, T., Oil options for deep-fat frying, Food Technol., 61(07), 46, 2007. 20. Erickson, M.D. and Frey, N., Properly enhanced oils in food applications, Food Technol., 48(11), 63–68, 1994. 21. Block, Z., Uniform doughnut production: Cake and yeast raised, in Proceedings of The 35th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Bakery Engineers, March 2–5, 1959, Chicago, IL, p. 258. 22. Dixon, J.R., Ingredients in doughnut mixes, in Proceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Bakery Engineers, March 1–3, 1976, Chicago, IL, p. 164. 23. Min, D.B. and Schweizer, D.Q., Lipid oxidation in potato chips, JAOCS, 60, 1662–1665, 1983. 24. Vandaveer, R.L., Corn chip frying oils, Chipper/Snacker, May, 35–38, 1985. 25. Banks, D., Industrial frying, in Deep Frying, Chemistry, Nutrition, and Practical Applications, Perkins, E.G. and Erickson, M.D., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1996, pp. 263–264. 26. Weiss, T.J., Frying shortenings and their utilization, in Food Oils and Their Uses, 2nd ed., AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1983, p. 173.
Chapter 8
Dairy Analog Shortenings
8.1 INTRODUCTION The early stages of the development and introduction of dairy analogs began during World War II when a shortage of dairy products caused a need for simulated foods. Acceptance of the dairy substitutes can be attributed, to a large extent, to rapid advances in fats and oils as well as emulsion technology and advancements in food product formulations. In all three of these areas, technologies have been developed to enable food processors to produce dairy analogs, which not only closely resemble the natural dairy products, but also include many improvements. The advantages these products offer to household and institutional users include (1) ease of handling, (2) extended shelf life, (3) tolerance to temperature abuse and bacterial spoilage, (4) source oil selection to satisfy religious dietary requirements, (5) nutritional values control, and (6) an economic advantage. Two types of dairylike products are produced with fats and oils products other than butterfat. Filled dairy products are those dairy analogs that have been compounded or blended with any fat or oil other than milk fat. These dairy analog types include mellorine, filled milk, evaporated milk alternatives, filled cheeses, and margarines. Imitation dairy products do not contain any milk product; however, casein and whey, which are milk protein, have been allowed. This group includes coffee whiteners, whipped and aerated toppings, imitation milk, imitation cheese, and dip bases. Dairy analogs originally resembled the original milk products quite closely, but now many of these products have matured to the point that improvements have been made to change or modify some of the products to provide a better shelf life, better functionality for the intended performance, or some other desirable characteristic. Dairy analog products are basically emulsions of specially processed fats and oils products in water with varying quantities of protein, sugar, stabilizer, emulsifiers, flavors, colors, and buffer salts added to give each product the desired physical appearance and eating properties. Dairy analogs can be prepared in a variety of physical forms, ranging from dry mixes to pressurized containers. Regardless of the final physical form, the quality of the finished product is contingent on the selection and use of proper ingredients: 425
426
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
• Dairy analog shortening: Fat is the most important ingredient used in dairylike products. It establishes the eating properties, physical appearance, and stability of the finished product. A shortening that performs well in one dairy analog application may be unsatisfactory for another; therefore, it is necessary to match the performance characteristics of the shortening to the finished product requirements. The various shortening types utilized for nondairy applications are identified in Table 8.1 and characterized by melting point, solids fat index (SFI), and fatty acid composition. • Protein: The principal function of protein in dairylike products is to contribute to the stability, body, and viscosity of the finished product. Protein may also serve as an agent to trap gases in whipped toppings or as a dispersing agent or protective colloid in emulsions. The protein used may come from a number of sources, such as liquid skimmed milk, nonfat milk solids, caseinates, gelatin, whey, or egg or soy protein. Whichever is selected, emphasis must be placed on the use of a bland, flavorless protein that will not detract from the flavor of the finished product. • Sugars or carbohydrates: Sugar provides sweetness and body, aids in solubility, and affects the viscosity or density of the finished product. Available sources are corn syrup, corn syrup solids, dextrose, cane, beet sugars, etc. • Stabilizers: Stabilizers increase the body of the emulsion and help prevent syneresis or water separation. In many products, a combination of stabilizers may be required to achieve the stability required. • Emulsifiers: The surfactant or surfactant system for each product can vary with the individual demands of the finished product and each manufacturer’s processes. • Buffer salts: Buffers are added to certain dairylike products to maintain the desired pH to minimize body variations and to improve the colloidal properties of the protein employed. • Flavors: Numerous natural and artificial flavors are available for use in these dairylike systems. The flavor experienced with a fresh product is not necessarily the flavor that the product will have after the crystal habits of the fats and oils have stabilized.
8.2 NONDAIRY CREAMER Nondairy creamers are not imitation cream. They are formulated systems similar in functionality to the natural dairy product, with the advantages of longer shelf life, convenient product forms, and uniform quality and performance. Generally, a nondairy creamer or base may be defined as a stabilized fat source, a creaming agent, or cream substitute. Nondairy creamers combine five basic ingredients (shortening, protein, carbohydrates, stabilizers, and emulsifiers) with water to form a stable product with a delicate flavor that disperses quickly in coffee without feathering or oiling off. A good whitener effectively approximates the appearance, quality, and taste of coffee cream. Nondairy creamers are marketed in three different physical forms:
1. Liquid coffee whiteners are processed, transported, and marketed in the liquid state. This ready-to-use product form is utilized primarily in homes and restaurants and usually has a limited shelf life, slightly better than dairy creamers. Acceptable
59.0 29.0 — — — 9.0
— 0.5 7.1 6.0 47.1 18.5 — — 9.1 — — 2.8 6.8 1.9 0.1 0.1 — — —
33.0 14.0 10.0 3.0 — 31.5
3.6 2.2 1.2 2.5 2.9 10.8 0.8 2.1 26.9 2.0 0.7 12.1 28.5 3.2 0.4 — 0.1 — 7.2tp
— 0.5 9.5 6.5 46.0 16.9 — — 8.5 — — 10.4 1.2 0.2 — — — — nil
57.0 33.0 8.0 3.0 — 1.0
33.3 92.0
— 0.6 9.3 6.4 46.8 16.4 — — 8.5 — — 11.2 1.0 — — — — — nil
63.0 41.0 16.0 7.0 4.0 >1
43.3 110.0
Hydrogenated
Coconut Oil
Notes: t = trans included, tp = typical, e = estimated.
24.4 76.0
RBD
35.0 95.0
Butter
Processing
Mettler dropping point °C °F Solids fat index 10.0°C/50°F 21.1°C/70°F 26.7°C/80°F 33.3°C/92°F 40.0°C/104°F Iodine value Fatty acid composition, % C-4:0 Butyric C-6:0 Caproic C-8:0 Caprylic C-10:0 Capric C-12:0 Lauric C-14:0 Myristic C-14:1 Myristoleic C-15:0 Pentadelandic C-16:0 Palmitic C-16:1 Palmitoleic C-17:0 Margaric C-18:0 Stearic C-18:1 Oleict C-18:2 Linoleict C-18:3 Linolenict C-20:0 Arachidic C-20:1 Gadoleic C-22-0 Behenic trans fatty acids, %
Milk Fat
Source Oil
Table 8.1 Dairy Analog Potential Shortening Products
— — — — — — — — 10.8 — — 8.2 74.0 6.0 — — — — 44.7
41.0 24.0 16.0 3.0 — 74.0
35.0 95.0
— — — — — — — — 10.8 — — 13.2 74.0 2.0 — — — — 39.5
57.0 45.0 40.0 20.0 4.0 67.0
41.1 106.0
— — 2.0 3.0 46.0 17.0 — — 9.0 — — 21.0 2.0 — — — — — nil
64.0 55.0 38.0 8.0 — 3.0
36.1 97.0
— — 2.0 3.0 48.0 16.0 — — 8.0 — — 20.0 3.0 — — — — — nil
68.0 56.0 40.0 12.0 4.0 3.0
38.9 102.0
— — 2.0 3.0 40.0 14.0 — — 12.0 — — 27.0 2.0 — — — — — nil
69.0 58.0 50.0 27.0 14.0 3.0
44.4 112.0
& Interesterified
Hydrogenated
Selectively Hydrogenated
Palm Kernel & Cottonseed Oil
Soybean Oil
— — — — 0.5 0.6 — — 16.4 0.4 0.3 12.2 67.4 1.4 0.3 0.4 — 0.3 38.0e
72.0 63.0 55.0 25.0 5.0 59.0
37.2 99.0
& Fractionated
— — — — — 0.3 — — 12.5 0.4 — 10.8 74.8 0.3 — 0.5 — 0.4 55.0e
58.0 43.0 34.0 12.0 1.0 75.0
38.5 102.0
Hydrogenated
Specially
Soybean & Cottonseed Oil Hydrogenated
— — — — — — — — 10.6 — — 6.5 44.5 36.5 2.0 — — — 15.9
3.5 2.5 2.5 2.0 1.5 107.0
31.1 88.0
Shortening
Liquid
Soybean Oil
Dairy Analog Shortenings 427
428
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
liquid coffee whiteners must have an unusually high degree of emulsion stability to remain in a uniform emulsion on standing after preparation and prior to sale to prevent oiling-off or feathering when added to coffee. It must also withstand freeze–thaw cycles without separating and maintain a viscosity simulating the natural dairy product. A heavy-bodied product will not disperse in coffee, just as a thin or separated product that oils off is not acceptable. Whitening ability, which is controlled by the total amount of solids present and the fineness of the dispersed phase, must be uniform. Coffee whiteners must also maintain a bland flavor and be odor free for the life of the product. The concentration of fat can vary from 5 to 18% for liquid coffee whiteners. A shortening or fat with a relatively low melting point and a narrow plastic range indicated by a steep SFI profile are desirable for the liquid creamers. Higher melting points may impart a greasy mouth feel to fluid whiteners. Liquid fats interfere with dispersibility because of absorption into the protein and coalescence. The shortenings most often utilized by the liquid whiteners are 76 and 92°F coconut oil, selectively hydrogenated soybean oil with a 95°F melting point, and liquid opaque shortening. Coconut has a steep SFI and sharp melting point for good mouth feel and eating characteristics, but can develop soapy flavors due to hydrolysis of the lauric fatty acid content, especially with the high moisture content of the liquid whiteners. The 74-iodine value (IV) selectively hydrogenated soybean oil product has a melting point and SFI profile very similar to butterfat. Liquid shortenings have found acceptance because of the ease of handling and the high polyunsaturated level in the finished coffee whitener. Liquid shortenings can be trans fatty acid free when formulated with nonhydrogenated base oils. 2. Frozen liquid coffee whiteners are processed, frozen, and shipped to the retail markets in a frozen state with directions for defrosting before use. The characteristics and processing techniques for this type of whitener are similar to the liquidtype coffee whitener, but, because this product is frozen and maintained in the frozen state prior to use, a shorter shelf life after thawing can be tolerated, but the product must have good freeze–thaw stability to prevent separation when the product is thawed for use. Normally, the same shortenings are utilized for frozen coffee whiteners as the regular liquid product. 3. Spray-dried nondairy creamers are processed as a free-flowing dry powder. During processing of the nondairy powders, the fat is coated with emulsifier, allowing it to mix with the protein slurry. Homogenization forms globules, which are tiny, stabilized droplets of fat. An emulsified, homogenized fat exhibits a high degree of whitening in coffee. The carbohydrates and the other ingredients coat the outside of the globules. This slurry is sprayed in a fine mist into the hot dryer chamber. This causes the water to flash off, and the resulting powder falls to the bottom of the dryer. The nondairy powders must have a superior oxidative stability to withstand the processing abuse and to provide the shelf-life stability required, which is one of the main advantages of their use, along with room-temperature storage (the other nondairy products and natural dairy cream require refrigeration). Additionally, the dry product must exhibit good flow properties, that is, clumping and caking must be avoided. Although the principal use for the nondairy powders is for whitening coffee, a number of other uses have emerged where the powders can replace dairy products or where other new applications have been developed. At least five different types of the spray-dried nondairy creamers are produced: a. Coffee whiteners: These retail marketed products, which have fat contents between 16 and 40% (dry basis), are specifically processed, low-density
Dairy Analog Shortenings
b.
c.
d.
e.
429
powders that provide desirable packaging properties, as well as “sink and dispersion” characteristics in coffee. The lower fat levels are utilized in light or low-fat coffee whiteners to reduce the calories. Aerated whiteners: Specially processed dry powders with encapsulated air within the nondairy creamer to produce a cappuccino effect when added to regular coffee. Reconstituted creamers: These are dry powders designed to be reconstituted, pasteurized, homogenized, and packaged for restaurant or retail marketing as liquid products for use in dairy-type applications. Vending creamers: These dry powders have fat contents of around 35% and a higher density than regular coffee whiteners. Ingredient bases: These dry powders, with relatively high densities (typically 50% fat), are produced as ingredients or bases for liquid beverages, puddings, gravy mixes, whipped toppings, dips, etc.
The lipid systems for coffee whiteners have been tailored to meet the performance requirements of the product type into which they are formulated, whether they are liquid, frozen-liquid, or the various spray-dried products. Nondairy powdered creamers usually require higher melting-point shortenings. Lower meltingpoint fats incorporated into spray-dried whiteners may cause the powders to lump at high temperatures and may disperse poorly in hot coffee. Generally, the shortening requirements for nondairy coffee creamer powders have been composed of hydrogenated coconut oil with a 110°F (43.3°C) melting point, interesterified and hydrogenated palm kernel oil with a 112°F (44.4°C) melting point, or a selectively hydrogenated soybean oil with a 106°F (41.1°C) melting point. The spray-dried coffee whiteners usually require higher melting fats for extended shelf life, anticlumping characteristics, good dispersion in hot liquids, and whitening. Emulsifiers are employed in all three nondairy creamers to combine immiscible fat and water, help maintain a stable emulsion, and create the proper amount of fat agglomeration in order to achieve the major objective — lightening the color of coffee. A number of different emulsifier systems can be formulated for the nondairy powders, including mono- and diglycerides, polysorbate 60 and 80, glyceryllacto esters, lecithin, propylene glycol monoester (PGME), sodium stearoyl lactylate (SSL), and others depending on the functionality desired and preferences of the processor. In almost all cases, the emulsifier requirements are added independently of the shortening requirement. 8.3 WHIPPED TOPPING Whipping cream stability problems brought about the development of nondairy whipped toppings. Whipped toppings have become popular for both commercial and consumer use as toppings on puddings, sodas, cakes, ice cream, fruit, and pastries, in addition to extensive use as cream pie bases. Nondairy whipped toppings are more functional than whipping cream because manufacturers can use a more desirable fat characterized by a specific SFI profile with complementary emulsifier systems.
430
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Whipped toppings are marketed in a variety of forms, all of which have similar formulation characteristics: • Liquid whipped topping: This basic topping is an oil-in-water emulsion containing fat, protein, sugar, stabilizer, and emulsifier and which requires mechanical whipping to produce a topping with the desired overrun and dryness. It is usually packaged in PurePak® containers for retail, foodservice, and food processor applications. • Topping concentrate: This oil-in-water emulsion is similar to the liquid whipped topping but contains less water. Prior to use, milk, skim milk, cream, juice, or water is added, and the mix is agitated to produce the desired overrun and dryness. This is a popular form for preparation of bakery cream pie fillings and cake toppings. • Aerosol topping: This oil-in-water emulsion is similar to a liquid topping, but is packaged in a pressurized container. The topping is automatically whipped as it passes through the aerosol spray nozzle. This package and application is popular for the retail and foodservice markets. • Powdered toppings: This oil-in-water emulsion, which is spray dried to contain a minimum of water, is one of the most difficult toppings to formulate and manufacture. When reconstituted with milk, skim milk, or water, it is mechanically whipped to attain the desired stiffness and overrun. The powdered topping form offers a longer shelf life than either the liquid or the aerosol toppings, and the end product ranks high in consumer appeal. • Frozen ready-to-use topping: This complete product is marketed in retail grocery stores in plastic, recloseable containers in convenient sizes for household consumers. Marketing this product in the frozen state substantially improves the shelf life of the product. The use life in the home refrigerator after thawing is probably three to six weeks. Normally, the ready-to-use toppings are formulated with sodium caseinate because milk solids do not lend themselves to freezing. The ready-touse toppings are processed like the other toppings, except that after pasteurization and homogenization the finished topping mix is sent through a continuous whipping machine and brought to its optimum specific gravity. It is then poured into plastic containers and rapidly frozen, usually with blast freezers set below –20°F (–28.9°C).
Preparation of a satisfactory whipped topping is more complex than most dairy analogs. Proper balance of the individual ingredients for the finished aerated topping is necessary to produce an appealing and commercially desirable whipped topping. The common ranges of basic ingredients as a percentage of the finished topping are generally in the ranges shown in Table 8.2.1 Most of the nondairy toppings are made by combining the ingredients and pasteurizing the mixture. The mix is then homogenized and cooled to 40°F (4.4°C) or lower before packaging. The finished mixes usually require 18 to 24 hours of tempering or aging before satisfactory whipping performance can be expected. Selection of the optimum emulsifier system for a whipped topping is quite important, as overrun, dryness, stiffness, mix stability, topping stability, and (to a degree) body and texture depend on it. The emulsifier concentration may vary from 0.4 to 1.0% of the total weight of the topping, according to the emulsifier system selected. The choice of emulsifier system depends on the ultimate form of whipped topping:
Dairy Analog Shortenings
431
Table 8.2 Whipped Topping Basic Ingredient Range Ingredient Range, % Shortening
Low 25.0
High 35.0
Protein
1.0
6.0
Sucrose
6.0
12.0
Corn syrup solids
2.0
5.0
Stabilizers
0.1
0.8
Emulsifiers
0.4
1.0
Salts
0.025
0.15
Water
46.0
64.0
liquid, frozen-liquid, or dry powder. Soft mono- and diglycerides and glyceryl-lacto esters or PGMEs are usually used in dried and liquid toppings. In fluid whipped toppings, whipping time can usually be reduced by adding more soft monoglyceride or polysorbates to the formula; however, higher emulsifier levels usually increase the viscosity of the finished whipped topping. Polysorbates or hard mono- and diglycerides are employed to produce toppings that have freeze–thaw stability. Adding a hard mono- and diglyceride usually lowers the specific gravity of the whipped topping and increases the whipping time required. Experience has indicated that whipped toppings should contain 25 to 35% fat to achieve whipping and body characteristics equivalent to natural cream. Lower fat contents may be used with the addition of high sugar, stabilizer, and emulsifier levels to provide body. However, a topping containing less than 25% fat is generally characterized by a slack body with a poor mouth feel, stability, and texture. Most whipped toppings are formulated with fats that have narrow plastic ranges reflected by a steep SFI slope. The shortening used must have sufficient fat solids at whipping temperature to give rigidity to the whipped product with a melting point in the 95 to 102°F (35 to 38.9°C) target range for rapid and complete getaway in the mouth. Higher melting products provide significantly better body and stand-up stability, but leave a distinct greasy and waxy mouth feel and aftertaste. Typically, the type of shortenings chosen for whipped topping are characteristic of those products (outlined in Table 8.1) with melting points from 95 to 102°F (35 to 38.9°C). These products have some nutritional deficiencies, such as high trans fatty acids for the hydrogenated soybean and soybean and cottonseed oil blends and high saturated fatty acids for the lauric oil products. However, the small serving size of the finished whipped topping, typically 2 teaspoons or 9 grams, limits the effect of either trans or saturated fatty acids. 8.4 CHEESE ANALOG Cheese analogs have replaced cheese in a variety of applications, primarily because of economic and improved performance for certain applications. Natural
432
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
cheese is basically made up of fat (24%), protein (20%), water (46%), minerals, and a small amount of carbohydrate, flavored by any of a number of processes and combined to provide the flavor and texture properties. A nondairy replacement involves the use of a fat source other than butter, a protein other than milk solids, and the compounding of a flavor system that duplicates as much as possible the natural cheese counterpart. An imitation or substitute cheese product must duplicate the performance and functionality of the original cheese product more uniformly. Functional characteristics, such as firmness, slicing properties, melting properties, shredding, etc., are all controllable through formulation and processing conditions and, once attained, can be reproduced with uniformity. The major uses developed for cheese analogs have been pizza, salads, frozen entrees, sandwiches, frozen appetizers, dips, spreads, sauces, and snacks. Replacement of butterfat with a shortening is the important first step in duplication of a dairy product. Cheese analogs require a fat with a melting point close to body temperature, a relatively steep SFI slope, good oxidative stability, and a bland flavor. A desirable SFI slope provides both good eating quality and solid fats at the temperature required for slicing and shredding, but allows the product to melt at elevated temperatures without oiling out. The fatty acid composition of the dairy analog shortening utilized is also important. Short-chain fatty acids from lauric oils can interfere with the flavor development in some cheese varieties and hydrolyze in others, due to the high moisture content, to produce soapy flavors. Deviation from butterfat properties is necessary for some dairy analog products, but, for imitation cheese products, a shortening with similar properties has performed most satisfactorily. Selectively hydrogenated domestic oils, such as the 74-IV product in Table 8.1 have performed more than adequately for cheese analogs. These shortening types have relatively steep SFI slopes and melting points like butterfat, do not contain lauric fatty acids, have good oxidative stability as indicated by the low polyunsaturate level, and have bland flavors. Unfortunately, this product has a high trans fatty acid content, which may necessitate reformulation with interesterified or fractionated oil blends. 8.5 FROZEN DESSERT OR MELLORINE Frozen dessert, or imitation ice cream, was probably the first dairy product analog produced after margarine. The name mellorine was adopted by several states as the generic name for frozen desserts made with fats other than butterfat. Unlike margarine, the dairy industry controlled mellorine by producing it in their ice cream plants and distributing it as a line extension. Mellorine is a filled milk product because it is produced with a fat source other than milk fat, but still contains milk solids contributed by nonfat milk solids or skim milk. It is generally made by the same process as used for ice cream and is available in two basic forms: (1) soft-serve and (2) hardened. Soft-serve was introduced to the American public through dairy stands, where it is dispensed directly from batch freezers. Complete soft-serve mixes are frozen in the batch freezer and dispensed as the customer watches into cones, sundaes,
Dairy Analog Shortenings
433
milk shakes, etc. Hardened mellorine products are packaged in the traditional pints, quarts, gallons, and bricks or made up into novelty items, such as coated bars, cups, etc., and quick frozen for distribution through the freezer sections of retail stores. Two factors that contribute heavily to mellorine quality are fat content and overrun. The fat content for hardened mellorine products has varied from a low of 4% to over 16%. Generally, higher fat levels are rated better quality, with 10% fat usually considered the minimum for good-quality hardened product. Hardened mellorine with a lower overrun has also been rated as the preferred product. Soft-serve products are judged differently. A 6 to 8% fat level with a high overrun is considered a quality soft-serve mellorine product. The mixing and manufacture of frozen desserts is handled in much the same manner as ice cream regarding pasteurization, homogenizing, freezing, etc. Nonfat milk solids or condensed skim milk can be used as the protein source, and hydrogenated vegetable oil or an animal fat can be substituted for the butterfat. A satisfactory texture cannot be achieved using liquid vegetable oils, but processed fats have been tailored for frozen dessert applications. Shortenings with a melting point close to body temperature and a steep SFI slope were developed to solve churn-out problems with soft-serve mellorine products. Churn-out is a freckling, or graining-out, of the fat, which results in a gritty mouth feel in the product. Churn-out occurs when the fat separates from the mix in lumps, which are difficult or impossible to re-emulsify into a smooth mixture. A coating of fat over the surface of the freezing unit is also an indication of churn-out. The selectively hydrogenated soybean oil shortening with a 95°F (35°C) melting point identified in Table 8.1 has performed well for soft-serve products. It can also be used for hardened products, but better results are obtained with the slightly firmer 106°F (41.1°C) selectively hydrogenated shortening. For hardened frozen desserts, the meltdown, chewiness, dryness, and texture are improved by the higher SFI contents and melting point; however, these same qualities are detrimental for soft-serve products as they promote churn-out. Both the emulsifiers utilized and the shortening composition can affect the stability of the mellorine mix regarding churn-out. Hard mono- and diglycerides and/or polysorbate-type emulsifiers are used in mellorine and ice cream. The hard mono- and diglyceride emulsifiers help produce a fine air cell structure and improved whipping performance. Polysorbate 80 or polyglycerol 8-1-0 ester provides optimum dryness and a smooth product with good stand-up qualities as required for packaged product. 8.6 SOUR CREAM ANALOG AND DIP BASES Imitation sour creams are used extensively for party dips, salad dressing, and potato toppings; as sauce enrichments; in cold soups; and for many other applications. These dairy analogs can be produced with lower fat levels, are more resistant to wheying off, have a longer shelf life, and are usually lower priced than the natural dairy product. Most processors use a direct acidulation process with edible organic acids, rather than the conventional sour cream process of injecting a bacterial culture into the pasteurized product. In most cases, analog sour creams are produced with
434
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
14 to 18% fat with nonfat milk solids or sodium caseinate, stabilizers, sugars, emulsifiers, flavoring, and an acid media. Processing includes mixing, pasteurizing, and homogenizing the product before packaging. Sour cream analogs are fluid as filled and require 10 to 12 hours of tempering at refrigerated temperatures for the fat to crystallize while the protein and stabilizers thicken the product to use consistency. A number of different fat compositions have been utilized for imitation sour creams and dip bases. Initially, coconut oil — refined, bleached, and deodorized (RBD) with a 76°F (24.4°C) melt or hardened to 92°F (33.3°F) melt — was preferred for the fast getaway provided by tropical oils high in lauric fatty acids. Selectively hydrogenated cottonseed or soybean oils with a 95°F (35°C) melt coupled with a steep SFI slope provide good mouth feel and product stability without the possibility of soapy flavor development caused by hydrolysis. Specially hydrogenated or hydrogenated and fractionated domestic oil blends can provide a more stable consistency over selective hydrogenated soybean oil products and retain mouth-feel quality even though the melting point is slightly higher. 8.7 FLUID MILK ANALOGS Fluid milk analogs can be produced as either filled or imitation products. The formulation of filled milk products is relatively simple. Whole milk is replaced with skim milk or buttermilk that has been homogenized with a fat source other than butterfat. Filled milk contains about 3.5% fat and requires about 3% α-monoglyceride (fat basis) for emulsification. The fat component should have a melting point below body temperature to avoid a greasy mouth feel.2 Three of the shortenings outlined in Table 8.1 would be likely candidates for fluid filled milk fat: 76°F (24.4°C) coconut oil, 95°F (35°C) melt selectively hydrogenated soybean oil, and opaque liquid shortening. The liquid shortening with a brush-hydrogenated basestock offers a high polyunsaturate-to-saturate level compared to the other fat products; however, it has a higher trans-isomer level than butterfat and coconut oil. A trans free liquid shortening could be formulated with a natural or genetically modified liquid oil to replace this basestock. Table 8.3 compares the fat nutritional values for whole fat milk containing butterfat with three vegetable fat alternatives for fluid milk analogs. Imitation fluid milk products should not contain any dairy products, except casein and whey proteins, but should maintain the same nutritional level as dairy fluid milk products. Sodium caseinate and whey have typically replaced milk solids in most imitation fluid milk products.3 The same shortening candidates apply to imitation as with the fluid filled milk products. 8.8 SWEETENED CONDENSED MILK ANALOGS Confectioners have used a considerable amount of sweetened condensed milk for caramels, candy centers, fudges, nougats, kisses, toffees, and similar confections. Sweetened condensed milk is produced from pasteurized and homogenized fluid
Dairy Analog Shortenings
435
Table 8.3 Effect of Various Fat Products Upon the Nutritional Data for Fluid Milk Analogs Selectively Fat Source
Butterfat
Coconut Oil
Hydrogenated
Liquid
Soybean Oil
Shortening
Fatty Acids, % Saturated
65.0
9.1
19.0
17.1
Trans
7.2
nil
~45.0*
~16.0*
Polyunsaturated
3.6t
2.0
—
24.5*
Monounsaturated
31.4t
6.8
35.0*
43.5*
a
Nutritional Facts Panel Values: Serving Size
1 cup
1 cup
1 cup
1 cup
Calories
150
150
150
150
Calories From Fat
70
70
70
70
Total Fat
8.0 grams
8.0 grams
8.0 grams
8.0 grams
Saturated fatty acids
5.0 grams
7.0 grams
1.5 grams
1.5 grams
Trans fatty acids
0.5 grams
0 grams
4.0 grams
1.5 grams
Polyunsaturated fatty acids
0 grams
0 grams
0 grams
2.0 grams
Monounsaturated fatty acids
2.0 grams
0.5 grams
3.0 grams
3.5 grams
Cholesterol
35 mg
0 mg
0 mg
0 mg
Notes: a = average; ~ = approximate; * = calculated; t = including trans; mg = milligrams.
milk, which is first condensed with a vacuum. Sugar is then added before the milk is condensed further to a ratio of three solids to one liquid. Sweetened condensed milk contains approximately 8.5% butterfat, 21.5% nonfat milk solids, 42% sugar, and 28% water. Sweetened condensed filled milk analogs can be produced by substituting condensed skim milk for condensed whole milk and adding a shortening and emulsifier for the fat content. This product is then condensed with a vacuum at 95 to 110°F (35 to 43.3°C) to develop the cooked or caramelized milk flavor desired for the confectionery products. Suitable shortening products shown in Table 8.1 for this application include all those with melting points centered from 95 to 102°F (35 to 38.9°C). The important fat-source characteristics are a relatively sharp melting point, a bland flavor, and good oxidative stability to prevent off-flavor development during the milk processing, production of the confection product, and its shelf life. Production of an imitation sweetened condensed milk product requires a more extensive composition of ingredients to replace the nonfat milk solids, including protein, lactose, and minerals. Caseinates, whey, starches, and other protein sources have been used to formulate the imitation products. The shortening requirements have been satisfied with essentially the same products as used with the sweetened condensed filled milk analogs.
436
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
REFERENCES
1. Anon., Guidelines to the Formulation of Whipped Toppings, Product Information Bulletin, Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc., Wilmington, DE, 1968, pp. 1–5. 2. Weiss, T.J., Imitation dairy products, in Food Oils and Their Uses, 2nd ed., AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1983, p. 295. 3. Henderson, J.L., Special milk products including imitations, in The Fluid-Milk Industry, AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1971, p. 455.
Chapter 9
Household Shortenings
9.1 INTRODUCTION Shortenings produced for household use have not become tailored products for specific applications like products produced for the foodservice and food processor industries. Household shortenings marketed in the United States are still truly allpurpose shortenings. These shortenings must be formulated for cooking, baking, frying, candy making, and any other type of home food preparation. The two basic types of household shortenings available are differentiated by composition (i.e., allvegetable or animal/vegetable blends). 9.2 HOUSEHOLD SHORTENING DEVELOPMENT In the United States, the styles of cooking and baking have been based on the use of plastic fats. Early immigrants to America were predominately of northern European extraction, who were accustomed to solid fats of animal origin and consequently preferred the solid fats in contrast to the liquid oils used predominately in southern Europe and Asia.1 Consumers tend to maintain their old habits, therefore, it is not surprising that less than 100 years ago, lard was the most commonly used fat in most U.S. households. It possesses several unique characteristics compared to the other available fats. It has a plastic solid consistency at room temperature, which provides creaming capabilities that other softer or firmer products could not duplicate. Also, lard has a white color and a mild flavor, which was much less objectionable than most of the alternative products available at that time. Vegetable shortening with all the physical characteristics of a plastic animal fat was an American invention; it was created by the cotton-growing industry and perfected for soybean oil utilization. Major improvements in fats and oils processing had to take place before homemakers would accept vegetable oils as lard substitutes. The color, flavor, texture, and functional properties had to be as much like their lard prototype as possible. First, all American fats and oils processors learned how to 437
438
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
bleach and then to produce a bland-flavored cottonseed oil that could be blended with lard as an extender. Initially, vegetable oils were converted to solids or plastic fats by blending them with a harder fat to give the required body to the final product. These compounds, which normally contained some lard, usually had (1) a stiff consistency, (2) a dull, dry appearance, and (3) a characteristic odor and flavor. Deodorization, which was introduced around 1890 and later perfected by Wesson, removed the strong offensive flavor contributed by cottonseed oils in the compound shortenings.2 Then, using an English patent for hydrogenation, Procter & Gamble introduced the first all-vegetable household shortening with cottonseed oil at the beginning of World War I. This shortening was called Crisco, which was short for crystallized cotton oil.3 In 1933, Procter & Gamble implemented another significant change for shortenings: the addition of mono- and diglycerides, which dramatically improved the performance of baking shortenings. This improvement was tempered somewhat for household shortenings because of the required all-purpose performance. The α monoglyceride level had to be maintained at a low enough level to retain a high smoke point for frying, but high enough to show an improvement in baking performance. The all-hydrogenated household shortening had evolved into a product with a creamy white color, bland odor and flavor, smooth texture, and plastic consistency with an extended shelf life. Advancements in segments of edible oil processing provided distinct quality and performance differences between all-vegetable and meat fat-based household shortenings, with advantages moving back and forth. Technology progressed to the point where it was difficult and often impossible for the consumer to distinguish one from the other. Both products were formulated to be smooth, creamy, white products for general-purpose functionality in all household cooking and baking. In the 1960s, marketing studies indicated that the meat fat/vegetable-blended shortenings were purchased most for frying applications, whereas all-vegetable shortenings were more often purchased for baking. These studies led the fats and oils processors to reduce the emulsifier level in meat fat/vegetable-blended household shortenings to increase the frying stability and raise the smoke point. Household shortening reformulation activities were also centered around nutritional concerns beginning in the 1960s. Initially, all-vegetable shortenings were reformulated to increase the level of the essential fatty acids linolenic (C-18:3) and linoleic (C-18:2). Until this time, household shortenings were hydrogenated to reduce the polyunsaturate levels, which ranged from 5 to 12%, for functionality and oxidative stability. In response to nutritional research findings suggesting that a higher intake of essential fatty acids would be beneficial, many all-vegetable household shortening compositions were modified to contain 10 to 30% polyunsaturated fatty acids.4 In 1985, health organizations began recommending diet modifications to lower serum cholesterol levels. Nutritional research had determined that the risk of heart attack increases with high cholesterol levels. These diet modifications included a reduced consumption of total fat, saturated fat, and cholesterol.4 Household shortenings made with meat fats suffered as a result of these findings, as only animals have the ability to produce cholesterol. U.S. legislation to require specific uniform
Household Shortenings
439
nutrition labels for packaged foods, including listing of total fat, saturated fatty acids, and cholesterol content, plus a limit on health or nutritional claims, was enacted on November 9, 1990. These concerns also contributed to reduced sales of all-vegetable household shortenings because the consumer thought of solid or plastic shortenings as being saturated fats. In 1990, Dutch investigators determined that diets high in trans fatty acids raised total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and lowered high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in humans compared to a high oleic fatty acid diet.5 After carefully evaluating scientific evidence on the health effects of trans fatty acids, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a final regulation requiring the addition of trans fatty acids to the Nutritional Facts panel on packaged foods effective January 1, 2006. The amount of trans must be listed on a separate line under total fat with saturated, polyunsaturated, and monounsaturated fatty acids.6 A decrease in household shortening consumption can also be related to other causes, such as convenience foods and a higher frequency of meals away from home. Prepared mixes, frozen foods, microwave foods, fast food restaurants, home-delivered foods, and other convenient foods have severely reduced home preparation of foods that require the use of household shortenings. 9.3 HOUSEHOLD SHORTENING PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS The product requirements for a household shortening differ somewhat from those for products prepared for foodservice and food processor applications. The important attributes for a household shortening, sold through retail outlets to consumers with extremely varied eating and cooking habits, are more difficult to identify than the more specific requirements for institutional products. The attributes of an ideal household shortening should include the following: • Appearance: The appearance of a household shortening is important from a psychological standpoint, as it is associated with quality. Whiteness or freedom from color with a satiny sheen suggests a creamy, smooth product texture. The container fill also affects appearance quality impressions. Many fats and oils processors have had requirements for the amount of shortening on a 3-lb. can lid and the appearance of the concentric rings on the surface of the product. • Flavor: The flavor of household shortening should be completely bland, unless intentionally flavored to enhance the flavor of a food product rather than contribute a flavor. The bland flavor must be sustained throughout the expected life of the shortening, which includes distribution, retail store shelf time, and the time from purchase until use. • Consistency and texture: The shortening should have a plastic, smooth, and creamy consistency and texture to make the product easy to measure and mix. A smooth, plastic shortening distributes more easily for measuring and more evenly in a batter or dough than a hard shortening. • Wide plastic range: The original shortening consistency should be maintained over a wide range of temperatures. Fluctuating home temperatures, age, and different
440
•
•
• • •
•
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
temperature requirements of the products being prepared should not affect the body or consistency of the shortening. Creaming properties: Household shortenings should aerate quickly and hold the absorbed air throughout the mixing cycle and baking. Creaming properties are important for cakes, cookies, icings, fillings, toppings, and other aerated products. Moisture retention: Household shortenings should enhance the moistness and eating quality of the finished products. Moisture retention capacity is directly related to the ability of a finished product to remain fresh. Smoke point: Consumer shortenings should have a smoke point high enough to ensure odorless, smokeless pan and deep frying throughout repeated frying. Stability: Three areas are concerned with stability: 1. Package stability: Flavor of the shortening must remain fresh and bland at room temperature for the use life of the product. 2. Frying stability: Flavor of the shortening during frying must be retained at its original purity with no breakdown, as revealed by smoke and odor. 3. Baking stability: Baking performance must be retained at the original quality with no breakdown, as revealed by off-flavors in the baked product. Uniformity: Each shortening purchase should perform just like the previous product. Product uniformity provides expected baking, frying, and cookery performance with each shortening purchase. Nutritional: Household shortening formulations must adjust to the latest research findings to provide the most healthful product possible to the homemaker along with uniformity of performance.
9.4 HOUSEHOLD SHORTENING FORMULATION Household shortenings must be designed for multipurpose use to provide creaming properties, a wide plastic range, heat tolerance, frying stability, baking performance, oxidative stability, light color, bland flavor, moisture retention, high smoke point, and other properties identified as important for a successful product. Household shortenings are formulated with a moderate level of mono- and diglyceride emulsifier for cake baking. The α-monoglyceride content is maintained at a low level to prevent excessive smoking during frying. Lowering the smoke point of a shortening is related to the free glycerine content of added mono- and diglycerides. Smoke point drops sharply as the free glycerine increases up to 0.12%, where it remains constant at about 200°F (93.3°C). Thus, the α-monoglyceride contents are usually maintained at 2.0% (± 0.4%) for household shortenings to provide emulsification for baking while retaining a fairly high smoke point for frying performance. Many fats and oils processors add the mono- and diglycerides to the shortening in the cooling tray of a semicontinuous deodorizer to reduce the free glycerine content to improve the smoke point of the shortening.7 The first semisolid shortenings using a vegetable oil were prepared by blending liquid cottonseed oil with animal fat stearine. These were referred to as compound shortenings. Introduction of the hydrogenation process allowed shortenings to be prepared entirely from vegetable oils. Hydrogenated all-vegetable household
Household Shortenings
441
shortenings can be made from a single hydrogenated oil, but they are usually made from blends of two or more hydrogenated base stocks. Until 1961, most household shortenings were formulated with an 80- to 85-IV basestock and a β′ hardfat. These shortenings had good performance characteristics and a high degree of stability. After 1961, shortening processors responded to nutritional research studies that suggested the benefits of a greater intake of the essential fatty acids: linoleic and linolenic. These shortenings increased the polyunsaturated fatty acid levels from 8.5 ± 3.5 to 27.5 ± 5.5. Many of the highly unsaturated household shortenings were formulated with 100- to 110-iodine value (IV) partially hydrogenated soybean oil or a soybean cottonseed oil blended basestock with cottonseed oil hardfat. This formulation change reverted somewhat to the classic compound type of formulation of a liquid basestock blended with a hardfat or stearine. The softer basestock produced a flatter solids fat index (SFI) slope and exhibited poorer oxidative stability, as shown by a comparison of the SFI and active oxygen method (AOM) stability results of 1957 and 1980 household shortening formulations that are tabulated in Table 9.1. The 2005 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Report8 recommended that consumers decrease their intake of both saturated and trans fatty acids in the diet to reduce their risk of elevated LDL cholesterol, maintain omega-6 fatty acids at 5 to 10% of calories, and increase omega-3 fatty acids to 0.6 to 1.2% of calories. Effective January 1, 2006, reporting of trans fatty acids joined saturated fatty acids and cholesterol on the Nutritional Facts panel for packaged products.9 The U.S. FDA regulation6 allows products containing less than 0.5 grams per serving to be listed as zero on the nutritional fact panel. Therefore, household shortening may claim a zero trans and/or saturated fatty acids even though the product is formulated with basestocks containing either of these fatty acids. However, household shortenings that contain hydrogenated oil must declare them in the ingredient statement. This declaration can cause consumers to avoid the product because the news media has repeatedly cautioned that any product with hydrogenated oil contains trans fatty acids. Consequently, most reformulation efforts will focus on modification processes other than hydrogenation. It is important that the trans-free reformulation efforts do not trade one problem for another; the saturated fatty acid content should not be substantially increased to provide the functionality required.10 Also, incorporation of polyunsaturated fatty acids must also be tempered by their greater susceptibility to oxidation affecting the flavor stability of foods, as well as the oxidative modification of lipoproteins in the blood.11 Reformulation efforts to reduce trans- and saturated fatty acids began after nutritionists identified both as being cholesterolemic. One option would be to revert back to a compound shortening formulation composed of liquid cottonseed oil and a cottonseed oil hardfat produced by fractionation (winterization) or hydrogenation. The analytical characteristics for this product would be similar to the 1980 formulation in Table 9.1, except that the trans fatty acid value would be zero and the saturated fatty acid value would be higher, probably 4.0 to 5.0 grams per serving. Random interesterification has been identified as a method to reduce trans fatty acids and still maintain functionality. A mixture of two radically different fats will respond to random interesterification because the distribution of fatty acids is always
442
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 9.1 Household Shortening Composition Evolution and Potential Future Modification Process
Hydrogenation
Interesterification
Composition, %
1957
1980
INT A
INT Blend
80 - 85 IV H-SBO
90.0
—
—
—
—
90.0
—
—
102 IV H-SBO High-Oleic Canola Oil
—
—
55.0
60-T CSO
10.0
10.0
—
30.0
63-T SBO
—
—
45.0
INT A
—
—
—
70.0
47.8
45.5
50.0
45.6
10.0°C/50°F
29.0
18.0
27.5
20.0 13.0
— —
Analytical Characteristics Mettler dropping point, °C Solids fat index 21.1°C/70°F
22.0
16.0
20.0
26.7°C/80°F
18.5
15.0
18.2*
11.6*
33.3°C/92°F
13.5
12.5
16.0
10.0
40.0°C/104°F Iodine value AOM stability, hours
8.5
8.0
11.0
8.0
74.0
93.0
56.0*
68.5*
135.0
35.0
—
—
2006 Nutritional Facts Values* Serving size, grams Calories per serving
a
12
12
12
12
110
110
110
110
3.0c
5.5b
4.5d
1.5
0
0f
6.5e
5.5g
5.0h
6.5i
0j
2.0k
1.0
1.0l
Saturated fatty acids, grams
3.0
Trans fatty acids, grams
2.5
Monounsaturated fatty acids, grams Polyunsaturated fatty acids, grams
c
c
f
Notes: * = calculated; INT = interesterified; AOM = active oxygen method; IV = iodine value; H = hydrogenated; SBO = soybean oil; CSO = cottonseed oil; T = titer. Value rounded from: a = 108; b = 5.7; c = 2.7; d = 4.3; e = 6.4; f = 0.24; g = 5.7; h = 5.1; i = 6.3; j = 0.2; k = 2.1; L = 1.2.
far from random in natural fats and oils. Random interesterification produces a steeper fat solids profile and a reduced melting point when a high melting fat is interesterified with a liquid oil. This process promotes the β′-crystal form by increasing the number of different fatty acid combinations attached to the glycerol backbone. The most successful feedstocks for the randomization process are liquid vegetable oils, completely hydrogenated oils, and whole oils or fractions of palm oil. Random interesterification formulation activities should consider the fatty acid composition and the new triglyceride profile created. The random distribution affects functionality by changing the fat solids melting characteristics. Also, the liquid oil chosen for the blend must have a satisfactory initial oxidative stability because interesterification does not improve the oxidative stability. Table 9.1 also shows two random
Household Shortenings
443
interesterification household shortening products.12 The product identified as INT A is similar to the 1957 evolution product and the INT Blend is similar to the 1980 product except that the trans fatty acids are eliminated and the saturated fatty acids are higher to provide the required fat solids profile. Directed interesterification, another modification process, utilizes low temperature reaction conditions to form trisaturated triglycerides and isolate them from the reaction. This selective crystallization upsets the equilibrium, and the reaction will produce more trisaturates to reestablish the equilibrium theoretically until all of the saturated fatty acids are converted to trisaturated triglycerides. The effect of directed interesterification differs depending on the fatty acid composition of the oil feedstock. Application to oil like cottonseed oil, which contains a substantial proportion of saturated fatty acids but hardly any trisaturated triglycerides, will raise the melting point because it increases the proportion of trisaturated triglycerides. Household shortenings made with this process have a good plastic range similar to blending a hardfat with a liquid oil. In effect, the hardfat ordinarily added to achieve the desired consistency is generated from the oil with a corresponding reduction in the quantity of intermediate-melting triglycerides.13 Cottonseed oil modified with the directed interesterification process should qualify as a household shortening formulation with a respectable oxidative stability that can be improved with TBHQ (tertiary butylhydroquinone) antioxidant. This modified cottonseed oil may require the addition of 2 to 3% cottonseed stearin, but even then the saturated fatty acid level would be lower than most compound shortening blends or the random interesterification products and still have a zero trans fatty acid level. Butter-flavored and colored household shortenings introduced in the 1950s have had limited acceptance, but enough to remain an active product. The beneficial effect is probably more psychological than functional. A yellow or butter-like color may be retained in some food products; however, the color and flavor tend to disappear during most frying and baking procedures. Meat fat shortenings were prepared with interesterified lard as the basestock until it was identified that the animal fat shortenings were used primarily for frying. Formulating specifically for frying performance produced a shortening with a slightly firmer consistency. Interesterified lard was replaced with a blend of tallow and brush-hydrogenated soybean oil with tallow hardfat. The soft soybean oil basestock allowed a higher level of tallow hardfat for heat stability and plasticity. Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) antioxidants are added to meat fat shortenings for oxidative stability to ensure at least a six-month shelf life for the product. Consumption of animal fat household shortenings decreased substantially with the nutritional recommendations to limit cholesterol and saturated fatty acids. The later recommendations to limit trans fatty acids also affected shortenings made with tallow. It contains approximately 5% trans fatty acids, which is characteristic of ruminate digestive systems. Lard does not contain trans fatty acids unless it is a component of the animal feed. Regular lard is still available in selected retail markets; it is usually deodorized and stabilized with lard hardfat and the antioxidants BHA and BHT. Most of the lard is used for pie crusts and ethnic food preparation and frying.
444
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
9.5 HOUSEHOLD SHORTENING PLASTICIZATION Household shortening functionality is influenced by two other processes in addition to composition: (1) chilling, which initiates the crystallization process, and (2) tempering, where the desirable crystal nuclei are developed and stabilized. The chilling unit outlet temperature control limits are determined by fill tests to identify the conditions necessary to produce the desired workable consistency and plasticity. However, household shortenings are normally quick-chilled from a heated liquid to 60 to 65°F (15.6 to 18.3°C) for all-vegetable product and 70 to 75°F (21.1 to 23.9°C) for an animal/vegetable product. The quick chill is followed by a crystallization stage with continuous agitation to develop fine crystals. After filling into containers, the product is tempered at 85°F (26.7°C), usually for 48 hours to stabilize crystallization. During the plasticization process, the shortening is transformed from a liquid to a plastic solid by chilling and working. Creaming gas, preferably an inert gas, such as nitrogen, is injected into the product prior to chilling. The function of the creaming gas for household shortenings is to provide: • • • • • • • • •
White creamy appearance Satiny surface sheen Texture improvement Homogeneity Volume increase Reduced serving weight Reduced calories per serving Reduced saturated fat per serving Less-dense product for easier handling
All-vegetable shortenings normally have 13% (± 1%) nitrogen creaming gas incorporated into the product. Some meat fat shortenings are also packaged with 13% (± 1%) nitrogen added, but most contain 18 to 25% and are designed as precreamed. Additional nitrogen assists the animal/vegetable shortenings formulated with tallow basestocks to maintain a more workable consistency and increases the product volume. Normally, 2 lbs., 10 oz. of the precreamed meat fat shortening product is packed in the same container that is used to market 3 lbs. of the all-vegetable shortening with 13% (± 1%) nitrogen incorporated. 9.6 HOUSEHOLD SHORTENING PACKAGING Consumer product packaging requirements must be considered carefully. Product quality, point-of-purchase appeal, and cost of the finished product are all affected by the package selection. Packaging cost is the second most significant portion of the finished product cost after raw materials.14 The protection afforded the product by the container directly affects the shelf life and customer satisfaction, and the package appearance and graphics must appeal to grocery shoppers.
Household Shortenings
445
The 3-lb. metal can (5 1/8 inches in diameter by 5 3/4inches in height), with a key-opening tear strip and a captive lid, was the standard for household shortenings for many years. This container was carefully filled so that the shortening surface was smooth with a satiny sheen and a curlicue on the top just barely touching the center of the lid. Shortening on the lid in excess of the size of a dime was considered a serious defect. The shortening can was filled and allowed to solidify on a slowly moving time-delay conveyor before seaming on the lid and applying the label to attain the desired product appearance. The standard 3-lb. can has gone through several economic changes to reduce the cost of the finished product. First, the expensive tear strip and key were eliminated and replaced with a plastic overcap for consumers to use to reclose the can after removing the lid with a standard can opener. Next, the tin plate in the body of the can was replaced by either a fiber-wound composite material or plastic. The lid and bottom of the composite can and the lid of the plastic can remained tin plate, requiring the consumer to open the product with a can opener. Now, the metal lid has been replaced with a peelable membrane with a plastic overcap provided for reclosure between uses. The peelable opening feature solved the major consumer complaint with metal and composite cans — that they were impossible to open with an electric can opener. The peelable cover also provides two other advantages: elimination of sharp edges and lower costs. Throughout all these packaging innovations, the container has retained the customary appearance of a 3-lb. can of household shortening. Household shortenings have also been packaged in other containers, including glass jars, cellophane bags, parchment-lined cartons, metal pails, and plastic pails or tubs. Most of these packages, with the exception of the glass jar, are still used for shortening products, at least on a regional basis. The most recent packaging introduction for consumer shortening was the shortening stick. Packaging for this product has changed from a parchment-wrapped, 1/4-lb. stick similar to the margarine quarters formed on Morpak™ equipment to a parchment-wrapped stick in a foil container. Margarine-forming and -packaging equipment necessitated a product composition change away from the wide plastic-range shortening product to a firm product that was not representative of the product concept known as household shortening, but the parchment-wrapped stick in a foil container has allowed a return to wide plastic-range shortening. The impetus behind this introduction is that customers have changed to include more full-time workers, more singles, and smaller households, suggesting that smaller quantities of shortening are being used in the home. REFERENCES
1. Black, H.C., Edible cottonseed oil products, in Cottonseed and Cottonseed Products, Bailey, A.E., Ed., Interscience, New York, 1948, p. 737. 2. Wrenn, L.B., Pioneer oil chemists: Albright, Wesson, INFORM, 6, 98, 1995. 3. Wrenn, L.B., Eli Whitney and his revolutionary gin, INFORM, 4, 12–15, 1993. 4. Institute of Shortening and Edible Oils, Inc., Food Fats and Oils, 8th ed., ISEO, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 6–7, 11–13, 22.
446
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
5. Wainwright, B., Specialty fats and oils, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E., and Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 506–512. 6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Volume 2, Part 101, Section 9, Revised April 1, 2006. 7. Gupta, M., Manufacturing process for emulsifiers, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 4, 5th ed., Hui, Y.H., Ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1996, pp. 594–595. 8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Part D: Science Base, Section 4: Fats, in 2005 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, pp. 1–54. 9. U.S. Federal Register, Food Labeling: Trans Fatty Acids in Nutrition, 68FR41433, July 11, 2003, pp. 134–137. 10. O’Brien, R.D. and Wakelyn, P.J., Cottonseed oil: An oil for trans-free options, INFORM, 16, 677, 2005. 11. Frankel, E., The lipovore’s challenge to food scientists, INFORM, 18, 469–472, 2007. 12. Lampbert, D., Processes and products of interesterification, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E., and Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 222–226. 13. Eckey, E.W., Esterification and Interesterification, JAOCS, 33, 577–578, 1956. 14. Leo, D.A., Packaging of fats and oils, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 3, 4th ed., Applewhite, T.H., Ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1985, p. 311.
Chapter 10
Margarine
10.1 INTRODUCTION Margarine is a flavored food product containing 80% fat. It is made by blending selected fats and oils with other ingredients and is fortified with vitamin A to produce a table, cooking, or baking fat product that serves the purpose of dairy butter, but is different in composition and can be varied for different applications.1 Margarine was developed to fill both an economic and a nutritional need when it was first made as a butter substitute. Its growth in popularity occurred because it could be physically altered to perform in many varied applications. Over 10 different types of margarines are produced today, including regular, whipped, soft tub, liquid, diet, spread, no fat, restaurant, baker’s, and specialty, all of which are packaged in as many different packages as there are types. These margarines are made from a variety of fats and oils, including soybean, cottonseed, palm, corn, canola, safflower, sunflower, lard, tallow, palm kernel, and coconut. Margarine products cater to the requirements of all the different consumers: retail, foodservice, and food processor. 10.2 MARGARINE DEVELOPMENT Margarine was developed in 1869 after Emperor Louis Napoleon III of France offered a prize for an inexpensive butter substitute. Butter production was lagging far behind demand because of a short supply of milk in all of Western Europe. Large population shifts from farms to factories during the Industrial Revolution had created a demand for butter that the milk supply could not meet, which caused butter prices to escalate. The situation was particularly serious in France because the country was experiencing a depression, and a war with Prussia was imminent.1 Attempts had been made to create a butter-like food for years, but a French chemist won the prize the first year it was offered. Hippolyte Megè-Mouriès obtained French Patent Number 86480 for his development, which he named “oleomargarine,” a combination of the
447
448
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Greek word for “pearl-like” (because it had a pearly luster when crystallized) and the fat source, oleo oil, derived from beef fat.2 The beef fat for the first margarine was rendered at a low temperature, then the separated oil was drawn off into trays and left to crystallize. The crystallized beef fat was then wrapped in filter cloths and cold pressed. The soft fraction from this pressing, called oleo oil, was the fat used for the original margarine. The oleo oil was mixed with milk and salt, which was chilled and churned to solidify the emulsion. The excess water was drained off, the margarine was worked into a plastic mass, and it was packed into barrels for distribution and sale.3 The first margarine was primitive by today’s standards. It was very firm and brittle at cold temperatures, but nutritionally equivalent to butter at only half the cost. It was an extraordinary achievement for the time and increasingly gained favor throughout Europe during the next decade. Accounts show that it was produced in the United States as early as 1874, still principally from oleo oil.4 Margarine was not economically feasible in the United States initially because of the refining techniques available; however, as these techniques were improved and margarine sales increased, the production of margarine attracted political attention. Concern from dairy farmers led the 1886 Congress to pass a series of antimargarine laws that were to last for 64 years. The Oleomargarine Act of 1886, together with subsequent amendments in 1902 and 1930, imposed taxes on white and then on yellow margarine. The act also required that the new table spread be labeled oleomargarine. Despite restrictive legislation passed by the U.S. Congress and many individual states, margarine experienced a slow, but steady increase in its acceptance as manufacturers continually improved the product and economic conditions made it an attractive alternative. We still occasionally hear or see the word oleo used, which is actually a misnomer today because oleo oil is used very infrequently as a margarine oil; however, oleo oil continued to be the fat source for margarines until the world population grew to the point that the animal fat supply could not meet the consumer demand for this table spread. The growing cattle herds on the Great Plains made the United States the major oleo oil supplier to the world until discovery of the hydrogenation process. This process, along with improvements in vegetable oil refining and the use of steam distillation to deodorize the oil, made it possible to transform a liquid oil into a hardened fat suitable for use in margarine. This development gave the margarine manufacturers a wider range of raw materials, which resulted in improvements in the texture and plasticity to make margarine products more acceptable to the consumer; margarine moved from a product used almost exclusively for baking and cooking to include use as a table spread. During the 1920s, margarine quality was improved considerably. Hydrogenated vegetable oils were used to a greater extent, but initially as blends with animal fats, then coconut oil came into wide use and accounted for about half of the oil used for margarine. Coconut oil offered several advantages over oleo oil and the oil blends that had been used. It could be hydrogenated and processed into firm margarine with the solid and stable shape associated with table spreads, but still melt sharply in the mouth more like butter, whereas oleo oil margarines had a high melting point with
Margarine
449
poor getaway in the mouth. Coconut oil became the preferred margarine source oil and accounted for about 45% of the total margarine fat requirements in 1920.5 During the depression of the 1930s, farm prices collapsed and farmers received high-tariff protection against imported products, which included coconut oil. These excise taxes made it prohibitive to use coconut oil as the base fat for margarine. The restrictive costs of coconut oil prompted the development of margarines using two available domestic oils: cottonseed and soybean oils. These oils were selectively hydrogenated to produce a relatively steep solids fat index (SFI) with a melting point close to body temperature. The products developed did not have the sharp melt and quick getaway of coconut oil, but the eating character was more like butter, and the product spread better than either coconut oil-based margarine or butter at cold temperatures.6 Nutrition became an issue as early as 1923 when Nucoa® brand margarine was the first to be fortified with vitamin A. This practice became universal among margarine producers around 1937. National margarine advertising claims of nutritional suitability for children led to Federal Trade Commission hearings that lasted for over four years. A notable scientist, Dr. Anton J. Carlson, testified that the fats in Nucoa margarine and butter were equally digestible, but that the margarine had more of the polyunsaturated fatty acid linoleic (C-18:2), which had been established as one of the fatty acids essential for normal growth and skin maintenance.2 An important milestone for margarine was the promulgation of the Definition and Standard of Identity for Oleomargarine by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1941. Further recognition of the food value of margarine was the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) classification of margarine as one of the items in its “Basic Seven” food groups. This recognition gave margarine an official identity of its own and removed the “imitation butter” stigma from the product. Then on July 1, 1950, after 28 months of debate, the Margarine Act of 1950 was passed, which ended the federal margarine tax system that had been in force since 1886. Restrictive state laws also began to be repealed, but it was not until 1967 that Wisconsin became the last state to repeal a law prohibiting colored margarine, and the final state margarine tax was not repealed in Minnesota until 1975.6 The depression and later World War II hardly constituted a proper environment for new product development; however, the war did increase the consumption of margarine as a result of a butter shortage. With the relaxation of government regulations in 1950, the margarine industry was ready for new product developments. The postwar era saw an increase in personal income and a substantial rise in the standard of living. Margarine, which still had the image of being an economical and inferior substitute for butter, could have suffered a substantial market share loss. However, the margarine industry reacted to the challenge by offering the consumer a wide variety of products with better quality and flavor, improved packaging, and higher prices, with an emphasis on nutrition. Some of the notable post-World War II margarine developments are as follows:2,3,6-12 1947: Coal tar, oil-soluble dyes were replaced with carotene, a form of vitamin A, for coloring margarines. Later, the use of coal tar dyes was prohibited for food use in
450
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
favor of natural coloring materials, which for margarine consist primarily of carotene extracts, red palm oil, and annatto. 1950: An aluminum foil interwrap for margarine quarters offered more product protection from oxidation than parchment and provided a quality image. 1952: A softer, cold-spreadable stick margarine was introduced. 1952: Soft whipped margarine in a tub was introduced and withdrawn because of poor reception. 1956: A premium margarine made with a lower melting oil and butterfat as a flavoring agent, which required refrigeration, was successfully introduced. 1957: A unique new process for producing a whipped margarine in stick form, packaged six sticks to the pound, was developed. 1957: Margarine overtook butter in U.S. per capita consumption. 1958: Corn oil margarine was introduced, which successfully capitalized on a high polyunsaturate level from the essential fatty acid: linoleic. 1962: The first soft margarine packaged in a table-service plastic container made from safflower oil with a high polyunsaturate-to-saturate ratio (P/S) was an immediate success upon introduction. 1963: Liquid margarine in a squeezable plastic container was introduced. 1964: Diet margarine containing half the calories of regular margarine was introduced. The FDA questioned the legality of the product, but lost an ensuing court case, which confirmed that diet margarine was a table spread product. 1968: Soft margarine was introduced in a decorated plastic container. 1975: A product labeled spread with 60% fat was introduced; it did not meet the Standard of Identity for regular or diet margarine. 1981: Margarine butter blends containing 5 to 40% butter were introduced by several margarine and butter processors. These premium products, priced between butter and margarine, provided a more definable butter flavor, with the improved spreadability and nutritional benefits of margarine. 1990: U.S. Nutritional Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) was enacted by the U.S. Congress specifying required and allowed nutritional information on food product labels and limiting food label claims 1994: The margarine standard of identity was changed to allow the use of marine oils. 1998: Cholesterol-reducing spreads with sterol/stanol esters were introduced. 2000: FDA authorized new coronary heart disease health claim for plant sterol/ stanol esters. 2006: Excellent source claim allowed for omega-3 EPA/DHA fatty acid combination. 2006: Trans fatty acids declaration added to the nutritional facts panel requirements.
Beginning in the 1950s, a series of developments in nutritional and medical science led to a new aspect of the margarine business. Studies of the diets of other countries, animal research, and dietary experiments began to make the biochemical word cholesterol familiar to the public. Saturated fatty acids in the diet were identified as a contributor to heart disease because they are converted to cholesterol in the body. It was concluded that fats high in polyunsaturated fatty acids would lower serum cholesterol levels. More recently, nutritional studies have concluded that diets with high trans fatty acid have an unfavorable effect on both low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol.13-16 As a result, the FDA issued a final regulation requiring disclosure of trans fatty acids on packaged foods effective
Margarine
451
Table 10.1 Margarine and Spread Source Oil Usage in the United States Fats and Oils Year
Millions of pounds 1950
Corn Oil Cottonseed Oil
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2005 30e
1
68
185
223
208
56
25
D
D
—
—
513
168
68
Safflower Oil
—
13
22
Soybean Oil
382
1370
1410
1653
Animal Fats
16
76
99
Unidentified
25
10
Total Per Capita, lbs
—
—
D —
1747
1465
848
104
35
12
3
34
112
14
15
937
1695
1794
2039
2102
1547
896
4.9
7.5
8.6
9.1
8.7
6.6
3.3
Notes: = estimate, D = data withheld by census. e
January 1, 2006. The amount of trans fatty acids must be listed on a separate line under saturated fatty acids on the nutritional facts panel for food products sold in the United States containing at least 0.5 grams/serving; products with less than 0.5 grams/serving are required to express their content as zero.17 In Canada, a zero value requires a trans fatty acid content of 0.2 grams per serving. The margarine industry has a history of reacting to the nutritional issues by introducing products containing source oils identified as high in polyunsaturates, initiating formulation changes to provide the maximum level of linolenic fatty acids, and now processing changes to limit trans fatty acids content. Table 10.1 tracks the changes in source oil utilization for U.S. margarines and spreads from 1950 through 2005.18-20 Soybean oil has been the dominant source oil since 1951, probably because of economics and its high polyunsaturated fatty acid content. Public awareness of nutritional issues was indicated by the acceptance of premium nutritional margarines featuring corn oil. The other vegetable oils shown in the table suggest that premium oils met with some success, but were later changed to another source oil or discontinued. Safflower oil is an example of discontinued usage in favor of another source oil — in this case, soybean oil. Animal fats have dropped from being the only fat source to very limited usage in low-cost products. This trend has continued with increased consumer awareness of cholesterol and saturated fats. Source oil changes were somewhat minor in comparison to formulation changes in reaction to the nutritional concerns. Blends of two or more hydrogenated basestocks, one of which was a very selectively hydrogenated basestock capable of creating a “hump” at the 70°F (21.1°F) SFI determination, was the standard for stick margarines before the desire for high polyunsaturated fatty acid levels became important. Formulation for high polyunsaturate levels, but still meeting the other stick-type margarine requirements, was accomplished by blending selectively hydrogenated firm basestocks with liquid oils that had not been hydrogenated. The soft tub margarines, introduced in 1962, were formulated with higher levels of polyunsaturates than stick margarines initially, and even higher levels later. High liquid oil levels can be used because of the package, and a softer product consistency
452
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
25.0
Lbs per Person
20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2005
Year Margarine
Butter
Total
Figure 10.1 Table spread consumption history.
is expected. The soft tub product does not require the firm print consistency necessary for stick margarines. The tub package also provided more product protection than a parchment or foil wrap, which allowed the use of more liquid oil with a lower oxidative stability. Soft tub margarines captured over 25% of the consumer market in less than 10 years after their introduction. The per capita table spread consumption history plotted in Figure 10.1 indicates that margarine volume surpassed that of butter for the first time in 1957; however, margarine has not achieved the high personal usage butter enjoyed prior to 1940. The overall trend for table-spread consumption is decreasing. Current nutritional concerns regarding fat consumption have certainly played a major role in the reduced usage of table-spread products. This concern was a major factor for the development, introduction, and acceptance of reduced-fat spread products. Fat shortages during World War II were the first stimulus for production of low-fat spreads in the United States. The first spreads were oil-in-water emulsions and had a number of limitations; that is, short shelf life, spongy texture, poor melt, and inability to withstand freezing. Technology to produce spreads with water-inoil emulsions solved most of these problems.21 The spreads market share increased from less than 5% in 1976 to more than 74% in 1995. The reasons for this growth were low price, availability in sizes larger than 1 pound, and fewer calories from a lower fat content than margarine, combined with acceptable flavor, mouth feel, melt characteristics, and other functional attributes. The first water-in-oil spreads were introduced at 60% fat, but the majority is now produced with 52% fat or less, but still utilizes the regular margarine base oils. Packaging for spreads has occurred in all the familiar margarine forms: stick, soft tub, soft whipped, etc. Popularity of the spread products continues to grow, even though the high moisture content produces some serious defects in comparison to margarine or butter (e.g., poor baking performance
Margarine
453
and a less creamy eating sensation). Obviously, the benefits of a low-fat content, reduced calorie count, perceived healthful composition, addition of supplements for specific health claims, and lower unit cost are attractive to consumers. Some spread producers have carried this concept even farther to produce consumer table spread products with less than 20% fat. Consumer margarine and spread consumption began to decline in the United States after 1982; demand for these products has decreased over 27% during the 1982 through 2000 period. Margarine and spread usage reached its zenith in 1976 at 12 pounds per person, and then maintained a usage level of over 11 pounds until 1983, when it began a steady decline to its lowest level since the 1950s: 8.3 pounds per person. Retail consumer sales were countered by foodservice demand improvements through 1985, which indicated that consumers were eating away from home more often. However, even with continued foodservice demands, the overall demand for margarine and spread products declined because of substantial consumer sales decreases. Food processor margarine and spread use appears to be declining somewhat, but at a much slower rate than for consumer products.22 These trends indicate that the U.S. consumer is aware of the nutritional message to reduce fat intake. Consumer margarine and spread products represent visible fats that are controlled by the homemaker. 10.3 MARGARINE FORMULATION Most countries that allow the sale of margarine have laws to regulate its composition. The United States has two Standards of Identity for margarine that are similar, but not identical. Vegetable oil margarines are regulated by the FDA, and margarine made with meat fats is regulated by the USDA. Margarine is defined as a plastic or liquid emulsion food product containing not less than 80% fat and 15,000 international units per pound of vitamin A. The edible fats and oils origin can be vegetable oil, animal carcass fat, or marine oil that has been affirmed as GRAS (generally recognized as safe). Chemical and physical modification of the edible oils with an accepted process is also permitted. The margarine standard of identity also stipulates that the product may contain one or more aqueous-phase ingredients and one or more optional ingredients with specific functions.23 10.3.1 Milk Products or Protein The optional ingredients of the aqueous phase include water, milk, or milk products. Initially, cow’s milk was used, but now water can be used with or without an edible protein component. The suitable edible protein components include whey, albumin, casein, caseinate, or soy protein isolate in amounts not greater than reasonably required to accomplish the desired effect. The factors controlling the protein choice are primarily flavor considerations and, to a lesser extent, performance in frying and cooking similar to butter. Initially, the margarine standards promulgated in 1941 required that the aqueous system contain 10% milk solids; however, that
454
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
requirement has been removed, and most margarine produced with milk or another protein contain considerably lower levels, usually less than 1.5%. A high level of the margarine produced currently is milk free, which presents fewer microbial problems and helps conform to the requirements of several religious diets. 10.3.2 Emulsifiers Several different food-grade emulsifiers are allowed as optional ingredients for margarine. Emulsifier systems are used to hold the fat and the water phase together and impart specific performance characteristics to the finished product. Originally, only lecithin and mono- and diglycerides were allowed at limited use levels, but the standards were opened to any surfactant with a GRAS designation at a level required to provide the desired effect or within the restrictions for the specific surfactant. Nevertheless, consumer margarines normally still rely on a two-component emulsifier system of lecithin and mono- and diglycerides. Lecithin is usually added at levels of 0.1 to 0.2% for its antispattering and natural emulsifying properties, and it helps affect a quicker salt release in the mouth. Mono- and diglycerides are added to most margarines for emulsion stability or protection against weeping, usually at levels below 0.5% α-monoglyceride. Hard mono- and diglyceride products provide a tight emulsion that can affect a delayed flavor release, whereas the soft mono- and diglycerides provide a loose emulsion for a quick flavor release. Foodservice and food processor margarines formulated for specific applications may contain different emulsifier systems and levels suited to the functionality requirements of the finished product. 10.3.3 Flavoring Materials Salt, sodium chloride, is added for flavor and also acts as a preservative. Potassium chloride can be substituted for sodium chloride in sodium-free margarines. Flavoring substances approved for food use and nutritive carbohydrate sweeteners or sugars are considered optional ingredients by the margarine standards. Many synthetic butter flavors are available for use in margarine. These are usually based on mixtures of compounds that have been identified as contributing to the flavor of butter, such as lactones, butyric fatty-acid esters, ketones, and aldehydes. Diacetyl, a primary constituent of many butter flavors, is formed in butter during the culturing process at concentrations of 1 to 4 ppm. Flavor perception is influenced by mouth feel, which is determined by the rate at which a margarine product melts in the mouth. Mouth feel is controlled by the melting characteristics of the fat portion and the tightness of the emulsion, which is a function of the emulsifier, protein, and stabilizer selections, as well as the processing techniques. Ideally, these characteristics should be balanced to allow the margarine to melt in the mouth and release the flavors to provide a pleasant eating sensation, rather than a pasty, waxy feeling that masks the flavor system or an immediate release that is overpowering and of short duration. Flavor and color for bakery margarines are one of the major differencing characteristic between margarine and shortening for baking applications. The flavor and
Margarine
455
color additives for baker’s margarine are usually more intense and must be more heat stable than for consumer margarines formulated for table use. Some of the commercial flavor compounds available contain butyric fatty acid or lactones to improve the buttery flavor in baked products. Most bakers’ margarines are also formulated with higher salt levels, usually 3.0% versus the 1.5 to 2.0% used in consumer margarine products. 10.3.4 Preservatives Preservatives, also optional ingredients permitted by the margarine Standard of Identity, protect against spoilage or deterioration. Margarine preservatives fall into three categories: antimicrobial, antioxidant, and metal scavenger. The standards list sorbic acid and benzoic acid and their sodium and calcium salts and allow use levels of 0.1% individually or 0.2% in combination. These compounds protect margarine against microbial spoilage. Benzoic acid is more active against bacterial action, whereas sorbic acid gives better protection against yeast and mold. Salt is also a preservative, although it is usually added for flavor enhancement. The salt level in most margarines ranges from 1.5 to 3.0%. Because the moisture level in margarine usually ranges from about 16 to 19%, the salt concentration in the aqueous phase is 8 to 19%. In most cases, the concentration of salt in the water phase will provide sufficient antimicrobial activity, but without other preservatives or acidulants mold can develop. Antioxidants may be necessary for the oxidative stability of products formulated with meat fats, but are not usually added to vegetable oil margarines. The tocopherols that survive vegetable oil processing provide adequate oxidative stability for most margarine products. Propyl, octyl, and dodecyl gallates, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), ascorbyl palmitate, and ascorbyl stearate are antioxidants permitted individually or in combination at a maximum level of 0.2%. Lecithin (both ascorbyl palmitate and stearate), isopropyl citrate, and calcium disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) all act as antioxidant synergists. A synergist performs two important functions: (1) it increases the antioxidant effectiveness, and (2) it ties up or chelates the trace metals, which are oxidative catalysts. EDTA is also effective as an agent to retard oxidative bleaching of the carotenoid colorants used in margarine.24 10.3.5 Vitamins and Color Fortification of all margarine products with vitamin A is mandatory; it must contain not less than 15,000 international units (IUs) per pound. The use of vitamin D is optional, but when added it must be at a minimum level of 1500 IUs per pound of finished margarine. Vitamin E addition is excluded under the Standards of Identity; however, the natural antioxidants in vegetable oils — tocopherols — are major sources for vitamin E, and variable amounts survive in processed margarines.25 The mandatory vitamin A level for margarine is usually attained by the addition of beta-carotene for colored margarines, with vitamin A esters used to adjust for the required potency. The colorless vitamin A esters are used for the entire requirement
456
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
for uncolored margarines. Natural extracts containing carotenoids, such as annatto, carrot oil, and palm oil have also been used to color margarines. Apocarotenal is a synthetic pigment that is used primarily as a color intensifier for beta-carotene. 10.3.6 Supplements for Health Claims The Nutritional Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) of 1990 directed the FDA to establish regulations to allow health claims supported by scientific evidence. In 2003, an abbreviated process for health claims was enacted. Two approved claims that have an effect on table spread formulations include: • Plant sterols have received FDA clearance as GRAS substances and authorization for the use of labeling health claims about their role in reducing the risk of coronary heart disease. The claim must specify that the daily dietary intake of plant sterol or stanol esters should be consumed in two servings eaten at different times of the day as a part of a diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol. To quality for the claim, the food product must contain at least 0.65 grams of plant sterol or 1.7 grams of stanol esters per serving.10,26 Foods that qualify for this health claim include spreads, salad dressings, snack bars, and dietary supplements in soft gel form.27 • An Excellent Source Nutrient Content Claim for a combination of eicosapentaenoic acid/docosahexaenoic acid (EPA/DHA) omega-3 fatty acids has been authorized by the FDA. The product must contain at least 32 mg of EPA and DHA per serving and include the statement contains [?] mg pf EPA and DHA per serving, which is [?]% of the 160 mg daily value for a combination of EPA and DHA. The other restrictions that apply are that the food must contain less than 20 mg per serving of cholesterol, less than 1 gram of saturated fatty acids, and fewer than 15% of calories from saturated fatty acids. It was also cautioned that consumers should not exceed 2 grams per day of EPA and DHA fatty acids as a safeguard against increased bleeding time, increased LDL cholesterol, and glycemic control for noninsulindependent diabetics.11
10.3.7 Margarine Oils and Fats The physical and functional aspects of a margarine product are primarily dependent on the characteristics of the major ingredient: margarine oil. Margarine consistency, texture, spreadability, color, appearance, flavor, mouth feel, and emulsion stability are all functions of the crystallized fat. In the United States, hydrogenation has been the preferred process utilized to change the solids/liquid relationship of margarine basestocks. Recently, formulations to limit or eliminate trans fatty acids have precluded the use of most of the partially hydrogenated basestocks. Modification of margarine oil basestocks has been converted to interesterification, fractionation, and/or blending of selected source oils to provide the desired characteristics. The formulation rules used with the hydrogenated basestocks apply to the other modification processed fats and oils with some adjustments. A direct relationship exists between the solids fat content and the structure, consistency, and plasticity of the finished margarine. SFI or SFC values at 50, 70, and 92°F
Margarine
457
Table 10.2 SFI and SFC Effect Upon Consumer Margarine Product Characteristics SFI/SFC Analysis Temperature
Solids Value
10.0°C–50°F
10 to 28–SFI
Characteristic
Solid/Liquid Relationship
Affected
Influence
Spreadability
12 to 40–SFC
Optional range for spreadability at refrigerator temperatures High SFI/SFC = firm, brittle, and non-spreadable
Printability
Low SFI/SFC = colder chilling temperature required High SFI/SFC = channeling possible with cooling
21.1°C–70°F
5 to 18–SFI
Consistency
8 to 23–SFC
Body and resistance to oil separation High SFI/SFC = brittle, firm, poor spreadability Low SFI/SFC = soft, soupy, oil separation
33.3°C–92°F
3.5 max–SFI 2 to 4–SFC
Mouth feel
Quality consumer table grade margarine High SFI/SFC = lingering, pasty, greasy waxy sensation due to coating of the palate
Notes: SFI = solids fat index, SFC = solids fat content, max = maximum.
(10, 21.1, and 33.3°C) are utilized by most margarine manufacturers in the United States for margarine consistency control. The SFI and SFC values, indicative of the crystallization tendencies and finished product qualities for consumer margarines, are shown in Table 10.2. The consistencies of consumer margarine products are somewhat comparable worldwide, but a point of confusion can exist with the fat solids analytical results. The SFI has been the most widely accepted method in the United States while SFC appears to be the method of choice in other countries and is gaining popularity in the United States. There is a fairly good correlation between the results of the SFC method by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and the SFI method by dilatometry, but the conversion equations are different for each type of fat or oil and each temperature.28 Table 10.3 compares the SFI and SFC results of a stick and a soft tub margarine oil formulation.29 10.4 LOW-FAT MARGARINE OR SPREAD Most margarine-like products containing less than 80% fat were required to be labeled as a spread prior to the Nutritional Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) of 1990. Included in the NLEA congressional act are provisions for the modification of standardized products, such as margarine, to describe products that do not comply
458
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 10.3 Stick and Soft Tub SFI and SFC Margarine Oil Standards Margarine Oil Type
Stick
Soft Tub
Iodine value
101.5 ± 1.5
113.5 ± 1.5
Mettler dropping point, °C
35.0 ± 1.0
Solids Fat Analysis
33.3 ± 1.0
SFI
SFC
SFI
SFC
10.0°C/50°F
21.5 ± 1.5
34.5 ± 1.5
10.0 ± 1.0
17.0 ± 2.0
21.1°C/70°F
14.0 ± 1.0
18.5 ± 1.5
6.5 ± 1.5
8.5 ± 1.5
33.3°/ 92°F
2.0 ± 1.0
2.0 ± 1.0
2.25 ± 0.75
2.0 ± 1.0
because of a nutritional claim. These provisions allow the spread products to be labeled as a modified margarine if they comply with the standard of identity for margarine23 in all respects except for the fat content. The qualifying criteria are
1. Reduced-fat or reduced-calorie margarine: 25% reduction in fat and calories, that is, 60% fat content — 21 CFR 101.6030 2. Light or lower-fat margarine: 50% fat reduction, or more, that is, 40% maximum fat content — 21 CFR 101.5631 3. Fat-free margarine: Less than 0.5 grams of fat per serving — 21 CFR 101.1332
The spread products that do not have a nutritional claim must still conform to the margarine standard in all respects, except for the fat content and the fact that only safe and suitable ingredients not provided for in the standard may be added to improve functional characteristics so that the spreads are not inferior to margarine. Soft tub and stick spreads containing 41 to 75% fat are usually formulated from the same fat and oil blends as those used for regular and modified margarines. The other ingredients utilized are also basically the same with the following exceptions:6,33 • Milk protein acts as an oil-in water emulsifier; consequently, the use of milk, casein, or caseinates can result in a phase reversion, so most spread and modified margarine formulations are milk and milk-protein free. • Emulsifier levels are increased and a synergetic system has been found most effective for emulsion stability, typically 0.6% intermediate-hardness mono- and diglycerides, 0.1 to 0.2% polyglycerol ester, and 0.3 to 1.0% saturated β′ hardfat. • Lecithin use in low-fat modified margarines and spreads may decrease the emulsion stability and increase the tendency to oil-off; however, it also functions to slow emulsion breakdown in the mouth, so the use of lecithin and the level of use must be evaluated for each formulation. • Gelatin, pectin, carrageenans, agar, xanthan gum, starch, alginates, or methylcellulose derivatives are gelling or thickening agents used in some spreads to improve body. • The flavor content and types must be defined for the individual products to produce the desired oral response. Higher emulsifier levels used for modified margarine and spread products can produce tighter emulsions, and/or the use of gelling or thickening agents can affect the rate and order in which flavors are perceived. • Preservatives are more important in modified margarines and spreads than in regular margarines because of the higher moisture contents.
Margarine
459
• The light reflection of a spread or modified margarine is different than that of regular margarine because of the increased number of water droplets present, thus it is necessary to add about twice the amount of color used in normal margarine to obtain the same color intensity.
10.5 CONSUMER MARGARINE OIL FORMULATIONS Increases in liquid oil levels in margarine oil formulations kept them in conformance with nutritional requirements for high polyunsaturate levels for a period in time. Now, the nutritional spotlight has focused on a reduction of saturated fatty acids, elimination of dietary cholesterol and trans fatty acids, and a balanced level of omega-3 and omega-6 essential fatty acids. Clinical nutritional studies have shown that dietary cholesterol, saturated fatty acids, and trans fatty acids are harmful to human health. The 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommendations regarding fats and oils consumption were: (1) calories from fat should be more than 20% but less than 35%, (2) limit dietary cholesterol intake to less than 300 mg per day, (3) limit saturated fat intake to less than 10% of calories, and (4) limit trans fatty acids as much as possible. No specific limit was recommended for trans fatty acids, but a 1% of energy limit has been suggested by several health organizations.34 Food labeling regulations were changed as result of the Nutritional Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) of 1990. This legislation required food labels to state (1) serving size; (2) number of servings; (3) nutritional information including calories, calories from fat, total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol; and (4) other nonfat nutrients. Then, effective January 1, 2006, trans fatty acids reporting was required on the Nutrition Facts panel.17 These recommendations and regulations have created formulation opportunities for processors that had relied on hydrogenated basestocks. During hydrogenation, some double bonds change configuration from cis to trans to form high-melting unsaturated fatty acids before saturation occurs. The high trans basestocks provide good oxidative stability and crystallation in the β′ form. These behavior changes have been utilized by formulators to produce margarine oils that are cholesterol-free and less saturated. Alternative modification processes for producing basestocks used to achieve a steep SFI/SFC curve without the benefit of trans fatty acids or increased saturated fatty acid contents that have been utilized are interesterification, fractionation, hydrogenation process and catalyst changes, and blending of selected source oils to provide the desired effects. The formulation rules used with hydrogenated basestocks can be adapted to basestocks or products of the other modification processes with some adjustments. The same basic relationship exists between the solids fat content and the structure, consistency, and plasticity of the finished margarines. 10.5.1 Margarine Oil Formulations with Hydrogenated Oils In the United States, hydrogenation has been the modification technique favored for processing of margarine basestocks. Consumer margarine oils were usually formulated by blending of two or more basestocks with different degrees of hardness.
460
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 10.4 Tablegrade Margarine Oils — Formulated with Hydrogenated Basestocks Stick Margarine Oils Margarine Type
Tub Margarine Oils
All
Soft
High
All
High
Hydrogenated
Printable
Liquid Oil
Hydrogenated
Liquid Oil
—
—
—
Basestock, % 60-IV H-SBO
18.0
18.0
66-IV H-SBO
38.0
50.0
15.0
—
—
74-IV H-SBO
20.0
—
25.0
—
—
85-IV H-SBO 109-IV H-SBO RB SBO
—
—
—
—
—
42.0
—
—
82.0
32.0 50.0
—
50.0
60.0
—
10.0°C/50°F
28.5±
22.0±
30.0±
12.0±
11.0±
21.1°C/70°F
17.5±
13.5±
17.0±
7.5±
5.5±
33.3°C/92°F
3.0±
2.0±
1.5±
3.0±
Solids Fat Index
0.7±
Saturates,c %
20.0
20.7
17.9
18.3
18.3
Trans isomers,c %
32.4
22.8
18.0
20.2
12.8
Notes: c = calculated, IV = iodine value, H = hydrogenated, SBO = soybean oil, RB = refined and bleached.
This permited the margarines to be spread directly out of the refrigerator and to maintain a solid consistency at room temperature with a desirable palatability. For quite some time, hydrogenated cottonseed oil was a component of most all-vegetable oil margarines to induce a β′-crystal habit to prevent graininess. However, the development of more spreadable margarines, the use of multiple high-trans basestocks, uniformly low cold storage temperatures, and synergetic emulsifier systems almost eliminated the need for the β′ seed stock by inhibiting the transition to of all soybean or corn oil margarine oils to the β-crystal form. The hydrogenated basestocks best suited for table-grade products have steep SFI or SFC slopes and provide the desired eating, melting, and nonoiling physical characteristics along with machinability. Table 4.6, in chapter 4, identifies a hydrogenated basestock system designed for margarine and shortening production. Table 10.4 designates the hydrogenated basestock compositions and SFI values for five table-grade margarine oils: three are for stick products and two are soft tub types. The soft stick margarine oil probably represents the softest stick type of margarine that can be printed successfully. Packaging equipment is available that will deposit, wrap, and carton product that is softer, but after packaging the margarine cannot withstand the normal abuse that occurs in storage and distribution. This product was introduced after the soft tub products in an effort to take advantage of the soft concept presented in the familiar stick package. The all-hydrogenated, stick, table-grade product represents the type that was the main consumer margarine product for quite some time. It is still the most preferred
Margarine
461
margarine type for baking and cooking because of a better oxidative stability and the firm consistency. This product also prints well due to the high 50°F (10°C) SFI, especially in equipment that forms prints with a compression chamber. The high liquid oil stick margarine base represents the majority of the stick margarine production. This formulation initially provided a marketing claim, but the oxidative stability of the product is reduced by the high liquid oil and, therefore, has a shorter shelf life. The surface of the margarine develops a darker color from oxidation that is quite noticeable when the surface layer is scraped away during use. Soft tub margarine oil compositions are somewhat like a compound shortening formulation: a blend of a soft and a hard basestock. The hard basestock cannot be as saturated as the low iodine value (IV) hardfats used for shortenings and should have steep SFI slope for good eating characteristics. Two different soft tub compositions are shown in Table 10.3. The all-hydrogenated product provides the oxidative stability and firmest consistency. Slight consistency differences can mean the difference between a soft tub margarine with a picture-perfect surface appearance or excessive “lid slosh.” The all-hydrogenated margarine base has a better chance of retaining a smooth surface because it should set quicker than the product formulated with liquid oil. Liquid margarine has been marketed for quite some time, but it has not achieved significant consumer acceptance. Food processors have accepted and utilized this product for specialty applications more so than consumers. Liquid margarine has been prepared using both β and β′ types of hardfats: 4 to 5% soybean or cottonseed oil hardfat with refined and bleached (RB) soybean oil. Product prepared with β-crystal-forming hardfat requires tempering of the supercooled mixture at an elevated temperature for a period of time under agitation to develop and stabilize the β-crystal. This liquid margarine process resembles the liquid shortening process closely. The β-crystal formulation and procedure produces a more fluid, less viscous product with better suspension stability than the β′ product but costs more to produce.35 The β′ hardfat direct process eliminates the requirements of a tempering or crystallization stage, provides a better texture and flavor, but requires constant refrigeration to avoid separation. Both of the liquid margarine oil formulations are virtually free of trans fatty acids. 10.5.2 Margarine Oil Formulation with Interesterified Oils There are two basic types of interesterification: random and direct. With random interesterification conditions, the fatty acids rearrange into a random pattern on the glycerol backbone. Directed interesterification is conducted at low temperatures to initiate crystallization of trisaturated triglycerides. Separation of the saturated triglycerides from the reaction continues until the fatty acids subject to crystallization are exhausted or the reaction is terminated. The lower melting fatty acids are randomly rearranged without the crystallized fatty acids. Random interesterification is most commonly used in the food industry to prepare functional fats and oils by modifying the triglyceride structure of blends of a hardfat with a liquid oil. Directed interesterification has the most application to transform a liquid oil into a semisolid product. Both interesterification processes affect physical changes to the fat and oil
462
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
products by a rearrangement of the fatty acids and do not saturate or isomerize them as is the case with hydrogenation. Therefore, the fat and oil feedstock composition is a major contributor to the interesterified product’s characteristics. A mixture of two radically different fats will respond to random interesterification because the distribution of fatty acids is always far from random. Random interesterification produces a steeper solids content and a reduced melting point when a high melting fat is interesterified with a liquid oil. It also slows down the transition of the crystal to the most stable β-crystal form to stabilize the modified oil in the β′-crystal form. Higher concentrations of a saturated feedstock have been identified as interesterified basestocks that can be blended with a liquid oil to produce margarine oil and shortening fat solids and melting characteristics desired for a variety of products. The most successful feedstocks for the randomization process are liquid vegetable oils, completely hydrogenated oils, and whole oils or fractions of palm, palm kernel, or coconut oils. Formulation on the basis of triglyceride structure is necessary with the use of the random interesterification process to modify the blends. The following guidelines for triglyceride structures have been proposed for a soft tub margarine oil formulation:36 S3: Triglycerides containing three saturated fatty acids should not exceed 6% to prevent a waxy mouth feel S2U: Triglycerides with a single unsaturated fatty acid provide consistency with a desirable mouth feel S2U:S3 Ratio: Should be a minimum of 3
Random interesterification has little effect on the solids fat content of most natural seed oils. In order for random interesterification to provide a SFC profile suitable for functionality, a liquid oil must be blended with a hardstock to develop the fat solids required for margarines and shortenings. A joint study by the University of Ghent and De Smet Engineering in Belgium chemically interesterified blend ratios of saturated fat with liquid soybean oil from 90:10 to 75:25 to identify the best choice of feed stocks to produce zero-trans fatty acid products similar to hydrogenated fats and oils products. The saturated fats in this study were almost fully saturated soybean oil (0.8 IV) and palm oil stearin (26.0 IV). The results of the 80:20 through 50:50 ratio interesterifications are presented in Table 10.5. Interesterified blends with 75% hardfat produced little change in the melting point and in SFC at temperatures above 35°C (95°F) indicating that interesterification of blends at a high hardfat ratio are ineffective. Interesterified blends with 10% hardfat had low SFC values at all temperatures due to the low levels of saturated fatty acids. The interesterified blend with 20% soybean hardfat had a SFC profile suitable for soft tub margarine oil and the 40% soybean hardfat and 50% palm stearin blends possessed SFC curves that closely matched blended hydrogenated stocks for stick margarine oils.37 These results indicated that random interesterification can be used to produce margarine oils directly or as basestocks for blending and that the hardfats providing the saturated fatty acids can be either low-iodine-value hydrogenated hardfats or a stearin derived from fractionation.
Margarine
463
Table 10.5 Properties of Random Interesterified Vegetable Oil Blends Palm Stearin, %
20
30
40
50
RB Soybean Oil, %
80
70
60
50
Interesterified Properties
Interesterified
Interesterified
Interesterified
Before
After
Before
33.1
37.2
23.0
35.0
21.00
34.2
19.3
33.6
18.4
29.30
28.4
5.0
37.1
—
39.3
4.3
38.5
6.3
47.7
Before
After
Before
After
U3
49.8
39.4
45.5
U2S
25.8
33.3
24.0
2.5
23.6
—
21.9
3.7
30.7
After
Triglycerides, %
S2U S3
10.40
Solids fat content 10.0°C/50°F
11.7
19.5e
34.6
43.0
21.1°C/70°F
3.7
6.5
e
16.7
23.0
33.3°C/92°F
0.5
3.5e
6.0
8.5
21.2
31.1c
41.0
44.5
113.0
101.8c
92.3
78.4
CMP, °C Iodine value SBO Hardfat, %
20
30
40
50
RB Soybean Oil, %
80
70
60
50
Interesterified Properties
Before
Interesterified
Interesterified
After
Before
Interesterified After
Before
Before
After
After
Triglycerides, % U3
45.3
37.0
40.5
26.0
37.0
17.1
31.0
11.1
U2S
27.4
42.4
21.6
51.0
17.4
40.0
15.1
28.4
4.0
17.3
5.4
14.5
4.9
31.9
3.5
47.4
23.3
3.3
32.5
8.5
40.7
11.0
50.4
13.1
S2U S3 Solids fat content 10.0°C/50°F
12.3
22.4
38.3
55.0
21.1°C/70°F
9.3
19.5
21.5
47.0
33.3°C/92°F CMP, °C Iodine value Laboratory Chemical Procedure:
3.5
8.5
17.5
29.0
31.0
47.0
53.0
56.0c
107.4
93.8
81.5
67.6c
Dry fat blend at 110°C and ca. 50 mbar for 40 minutes Add 0.2% sodium methoxide catalyst to fat blend at 90°C under vacuum After 90 minutes of stirring, cool the mixture to 80°C Break vacuum and add 20% citric acid solution to inactivate the catalyst, while mechanically stirring for 15 minutes Post bleach with 0.5% bleaching earth under vacuum for 30 minutes at 90°C
Notes: c = calculated, e = estimated, U = unsaturated, S = saturated, CMP = capillary melting point, SBO = soybean oil.
464
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Directed interesterification can convert a liquid oil into a semisolid capable of the production of margarine oil or a shortening base. The results of directed interesterification of sunflower, safflower, and corn oils are shown in Table 4.8 in chapter 4. In this reaction, trisaturates are formed in situ to produce products with solids profiles that are soft at low temperatures and firm at high temperatures for improved plastic ranges.38 Although soft zero-trans margarine can be prepared from 100% liquid oils, it is unlikely that satisfactory stick-type margarines can be prepared from natural oils. However, the genetically modified oils with higher saturate levels have more potential to produce the firmer margarine oils with directed interesterification 10.5.3 Margarine Oil Formulation with Fractionated Oils Fractionation separates an oil or fat into solid and liquid fractions, each of which can be used separately. Fractionation has been utilized to modify fats and oils to a greater extent in countries outside the United States due primarily to source oil availability. Fractionation has been used to select desired melting and solubility windows from a wide range of fats and oils, including palm oil, butter, tallow, lard, hydrogenated seed oils, and fish oils;39 the best known is palm oil in Southeast Asia. Palm oil has become a major food oil because of its availability, favorable costs, and technologies identified for its use. Natural palm oil use in consumer margarine is usually limited to 15% or less because: (1) it has a slow crystallization rate leading to product graininess, (2) margarines experience posthardening that causes the consistency to become firm after packaging (hardness can double in a week), and (3) its solids content above body temperature imparts a waxy mouth feel. It was determined that the slow crystallization and posthardening were caused by the symmetrical to asymmetrical triglyceride ratio and a high level of the symmetrical POP (palmiticoleic-palmitic) triglyceride: 40 to 45%. Interesterification of palm oil reorders the triglycerides to increase the high melting PPO (palmitic-palmitic-oleic) triglycerides and reduce the proportion of POP. Unfortunately, interesterified palm oil develops higher proportions of high melting tripalmitate for more undesirable organoleptic properties than the original palm oil product.40 Fractionation physically changes the triglyceride ratios by separating palm oil into an olein and stearin fraction. Both the olein and stearin fractions of palm oil have application in certain margarine blends. Palm stearin, the harder fraction of palm oil, contains a high level of the saturated fatty acid triglycerides. Stearin is an effective hardfat to stiffen bakers or roll-in margarine or as a hardfat for random interesterification. Palm olein is a useful source of the liquid oil requirement of consumer margarine oil formulations. The olein fractions contain higher levels of oleic and linoleic fatty acids than the original oil. The diglycerides in palm oil are preferentially distributed into the olein fraction along with the natural antioxidants. 10.5.4 Margarine Oil Formulation with Unmodified Oils Years ago it was common practice to use lauric oils, coconut and palm kernel, in margarine oils at 40% and higher. Lauric oils have steep melting curves and melt
Margarine
465
60
Solids Fat Index
50 40 30 20 10 0 –10
100
80
60
40
20
0
Palm Kernel Oil, % Solids Fat Index 10.0°C
Solids Fat Index 21.1°C
Solids Fat Index 33.3°C
Solids Fat Index 40.0°C
Solids Fat Index 26.7°C
Figure 10.2 Eutectic effect: Palm kernel and palm oil mixtures.
below body temperature. These margarines were relatively firm and brittle similar to butter, and the sharp melting characteristics produced a cooling sensation in the mouth. Later, it was determined that the lauric oils produced favorable melt down characteristics at 15% without the firm and brittle consistency. In soft margarines, the lauric oils have two conflicting effects: (1) a brittle consistency when incorporated at levels above 15%, and (2) a softening effect at 10° and 20°C (50° and 68°F) caused by the formation of eutectic mixtures.41 The molecular size difference between lauric and other vegetable oils form the eutectic mixtures.42 The steep melting properties and eutectic formation helps to counterbalance the high melting characteristics of stearins and the flat melting profile of oils like palm oil.43 Figure 10.2 illustrates the eutectic effect caused when palm kernel oil is mixed with palm oil.44 10.6 INDUSTRIAL MARGARINE FORMULATIONS Foodservice and food processor margarines may either be duplicates of the consumer products or designed for a specific use. A popular industrial product is the consumer stick margarine packaged in 1-pound solids for foodservice kitchen use and in 50-pound cases for food processor applications. Individual servings of consumer table-grade margarines and spreads are also large-volume foodservice products. Most of the other foodservice and food processor margarines are formulated for specific uses, with the main analytical criteria being the Mettler dropping point (MDP) to measure melting point and SFI. The differences in functionality are achieved by manipulation of the margarine oil components. Many of the industrial margarines are formulated for bakery applications. Table 10.6 lists typical SFI and MDP values for the general types of bakery
466
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 10.6 Industrial Margarine Types and Butter Margarine
Dairy Product
Butter
Tablegrade
Baker’s
Danish Roll-In
Liquid
Mettler dropping point, °C
35.0±
33.0±
49.0±
40.2±
ts
Solids fat index 10.0°C/50°F
33.0±
30.0±
25.0±
43.5±
3.0±
21.1°C/70°F
14.0±
17.0±
19.0±
25.8±
2.5±
26.7°C/80°F
10.0±
—
18.0±
20.6±
2.0±
33.3°C/92°F
3.0±
1.5±
14.0±
11.1±
2.0±
40.0°C/104°F
—
—
9.0±
2.0±
—
Note: ts = too soft.
margarines compared to butter. The function and formulation peculiarities for the bakery margarine categories include the following: • Table-grade margarine: The analytical values closely match butter with a relatively steep SFI and a MDP close to body temperature. Table-grade margarines are formulated like the stick margarine bases shown in Table 10.4 or the trans-free formulations. Typical bakery uses are fillings, crumb crusts, and buttercream icings. • Baker’s margarine: Baker’s margarine is designed to have a wide plastic range with good creaming properties like the standard all-purpose shortening. In fact, the margarine oil formulation can be the same composition as the all-purpose one shown in Table 6.1 in chapter 6: an 80- to 85-IV basestock with a saturated β′ hardfat or the trans-free formulation. Applications for this margarine include cookies, Danish pastries, croissants, buttercream icings, cakes, and piecrusts. • Roll-in margarine: Mechanical operations are more demanding than hand makeup, roll-in operations. It is critical that the margarine emulsion does not break when pumped and extruded under high pressure, that it maintains a smooth plasticity and consistency to spread evenly throughout lamination without bleeding into or tearing the dough, and that the margarine and the dough are compatible to prevent equipment problems. Roll-in margarines are formulated to achieve a relatively shallow SFI profile and are stabilized in the β′-crystal phase. The hard mono- and diglyceride emulsifiers provide a tight emulsion that will not break with extruder abuse. The moisture in the margarine emulsion generates steam in the oven for leavening and flakiness. As a general rule, the melting point must be 5°F (2.8°C) higher than the proofing temperature of the roll-in product to prevent oil-out before baking. Roll-in margarine oils are formulated like all-purpose shortenings, but with a higher level of the hardfat component. A random interesterified 50/50 blend of soybean oil and hardfat blended with 40% or less soybean oil should replace the usual hydrogenated formulations.
10.7 MARGARINE AND SPREAD PREPARATION Margarine and spread processing resembles shortening preparation, except that an emulsion is prepared by mixing the water-soluble and fat-soluble ingredients before
Margarine
467
chilling and crystallization. The basic steps for margarine and spread preparation include (1) margarine-base blending, (2) lipid-phase preparation, (3) aqueous-phase preparation, (4) emulsion preparation, (5) chilling and crystallization, (6) packaging, (7) tempering, (8) storage, and (9) distribution. The same procedures work well with both margarine and spread products containing from 52 to 80% fat; however, as the fat level decreases below 52%, strict process control for temperature and addition rates must be used to guard against the formation of a mixture of water-in-oil and oil-in-water emulsions or an all oil-in-water emulsion.25 The fat phase is prepared by heating the margarine base to a temperature of at least 10°F (5.6°C) above the melting point before adding the oil-soluble ingredients. These ingredients include the emulsifiers, vitamins, color, and flavor if it is oil soluble. The aqueous phase is prepared separately. When milk proteins are utilized, the milk or whey product is reconstituted if liquid skim milk is not used, pasteurized, and cooled until required. The water-soluble ingredients are added to the required amount of pasteurized skim milk, whey, or water in the case of protein-free products. The ingredients include salt, preservatives, water-soluble flavors, and any other water-soluble materials. The oil and aqueous phases are blended together with high-shear agitation to form a water-in-oil emulsion. It is important to add the water phase to the oil phase in order to promote the formation of a water-in-oil emulsion. The water addition rate has little effect on margarine emulsions, but is critical for spreads. It is essential that the water addition rate for spreads be reduced, especially in the early stages of emulsion preparation, to prevent inversion of the emulsion. Continuous agitation is necessary to maintain this emulsion. Without agitation, the water- or milk-phase droplets immediately begin to coalesce and settle out. After preparation, the emulsion is transferred to an agitated holding tank that supplies the chilling units. An alternative continuous emulsion preparation process consists of proportioning pump systems capable of metering individual ingredients of the aqueous phase together and also the oil-phase components. Inline static mixers are utilized to blend the separate phases, which are then mixed inline and emulsified with another static mixer. After inline blending, the loose emulsion is continuously fed to the crystallization system. The solidification process for the various margarine and spread types all employ a scraped-surface heat exchanger for rapid chilling, but the other steps are somewhat different from shortening and the other margarine types. The solidification or plasticization process for the four basic table spread types are as follows. 10.7.1 Stick Margarine or Spread The temperature of the stick margarine emulsion is adjusted and maintained for most table-grade products that melt below body temperature at 100 to 105°F (37.8 to 40.6°C) before pumping to the scraped-surface heat exchanger. If the temperature is allowed to cool below the melting point of the margarine base, precrystallization structures may be formed that affect the consistency of the finished product. It is rapidly chilled to 40 to 45°F (4.4 to 7.2°C) in less than 30 seconds. Stick margarine
468
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
requires a stiffer consistency than shortening, which is accomplished with the use of a quiescent tube immediately after the chilling unit. This is a warm water-jacketed cylinder that can contain baffles or perforated plates to prevent the product from channeling through the center of the cylinder. The length of this tube may have to be varied to increase or decrease crystallization time, depending on the product formulation. The supercooled mixture passes directly to a quiescent resting or aging tube for molded print-forming equipment. For filled print equipment, a small blender may be utilized before the resting tube to achieve the proper consistency for packaging and a slightly softer finished product. A remelt line is necessary because in all closed filler systems some overfeeding must be maintained for a uniform supply of product to the filler for weight control. The excess is pumped to a remelt tank and then reintroduced into the product line. Two types of stick margarine forming and wrapping equipment are used in the United States: molded print and filled print. The molded print system initially used an open hopper into which the product was forced from an aging tube through a perforated plate in the form of noodles. The margarine noodles were screw fed into a forming head and then discharged into the parchment paper-wrapping chamber and finally cartoned. Closed molded stick systems use a crystallization chamber instead of the aging tube and an open hopper arrangement that fills the mold cavity by line pressure. The filled print system accepts margarine from the quiescent tube with a semifluid consistency. The product is filled into a cavity prelined with the parchment or foil interwrap. The interwrap is then folded before ejection from the mold into the cartoning equipment. 10.7.2 Soft Tub Margarine or Spread The oil blends for soft tub margarines or spreads are formulated with lower solids-to-liquid ratios than the stick-type products to produce a spreadable product directly out of the refrigerator or freezer. Crystallization technique contributes to the desirable consistency as well, but the products are too soft to print into sticks, thus packaging in plastic tubs or cups with snap-on lids is utilized. To fill the container properly, the soft margarine or spread consistency must be semifluid like shortening, so the crystallization process more closely resembles shortening plasticization than stick margarine processing. The temperature of a typical soft margarine emulsion would be adjusted and maintained at 95 to 105°F (35.0 to 40.6°C) before transferring with a high-pressure pump to the scraped-surface heat exchanger. Creaming gas or nitrogen, added to further improve spreadability, is injected at the suction side of the pump at 8.0% for the most spreadable product; lower levels are used for a firmer product. Margarine blends are rapidly chilled to an exit temperature of 48 to 52°F (8.9 to 11.1°C). Spread fill temperatures are higher than for margarine products because the emulsion is more viscous. If the fill temperature is too low, the product will mound in the bowl for excessive lid coverage, and the product may become dry and crumbly. The supercooled margarine or spread mixture then passes through a worker unit to dissipate the heat of crystallization. The shaft in the worker unit revolves at about 35 to 50 revolutions per minute with an
Margarine
469
approximately three-minute residence time. Worked product is then delivered to the filler where it is forced through an extrusion valve at pressures in the range of 20 to 26.7 bar (300 to 400 psi). Either a rotary or straightline filler may be used to fill the tubs with margarine. The excess product necessary for a uniform supply to the filler is transferred to a remelt tank and eventually reenters the solidification system. 10.7.3 Whipped Tub Margarine or Spread The same equipment used to prepare, crystallize, and package regular soft tub margarine or spread can be utilized for whipped tub products. The difference during crystallization is the addition of 33% nitrogen gas by volume for a 50% overrun. The nitrogen is injected inline through a flow meter into the suction side of the pump. The larger tubs required for the increased volume necessitate change parts for the filling, lidding, and packaging equipment. 10.7.4 Liquid Margarine Both retail and commercial liquid margarines can be crystallized with the same equipment and process flow used for soft tub products, depending on the formulation and suspension stability requirements. Liquid margarine formulations normally consist of a liquid vegetable oil stabilized with either a β- or β′-forming hardfat. β′-stabilized liquid margarine can be prepared utilizing the same rapid crystallization process used to prepare soft tub margarines and omitting the addition of creaming gas. These finished products require refrigerated storage for suspension stability. Liquid margarines formulated with β-forming hardfats and some processed with β′ formulations incorporate a crystallization or tempering step to increase fluidity and suspension stability. This crystallization step consists of a holding period in an agitated jacketed vessel to dissipate the heat of crystallization. The product may be filled into containers after the product temperature has stabilized. Some products with higher solids-to-liquid ratios are further processed to stabilize the fluid suspension with either homogenization or a second pass through the scraped-surface heat exchanger before filling. The additional processing for more stable crystallization will increase fluidity and suspension stability, but the increased production costs may not be justifiable. 10.7.5 Industrial Margarines or Spreads Foodservice and food processor margarines and spreads may either be duplicates of the retail products in larger packages or designed for a specific use, either product- or process-related. Among the specific-use margarines, puff paste or Danish pastry applications are the most difficult regarding crystallization. The characteristic features of a roll-in margarine are plasticity and firmness. Plasticity is necessary, as the margarines should remain as unbroken layers during repeated folding and rolling operations. Firmness is equally important, as soft and oily margarine is partly absorbed by the dough, thus destroying its role as a barrier between the dough
470
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
layers. As with shortenings, the ultimate polymorphic form for roll-in margarines is determined by the triglyceride composition, but the rate at which the most stable form is reached can be influenced by mechanical and thermal energy. Therefore, the customary crystallization process for roll-in and/or baker’s margarines is a duplicate of the shortening plasticization process depicted in Figure 2.10 in chapter 2, except that margarines containing water or milk in emulsion form normally are not aerated. The aqueous phase of a margarine emulsion has the same effect as gas incorporation on appearance and performance. Food processor margarine products are usually packaged in 50-pound corrugated fiberboard cartons, 5-gallon plastic pails, 55-gallon drums, or special packaging designed for each specific use. REFERENCES
1. Riepma, S.F., The Story of Margarine, Public Affairs Press, Washington, D.C., 1970, pp. 5, 109, 148, 152. 2. Melnick, D., Margarine products, J. Home Econ., 60(10), 793–797, 1968. 3. Massiello, F.J., Changing trends in consumer margarines, JAOCS, 55, 262–265, 1978. 4. Schwitzer, M.K., Margarine and Other Food Fats, Interscience, New York, 1956, p. 64. 5. Stuyvenberg, J.H., Margarine: An Economic, Social and Scientific History 1869–1969, University Press, Liverpool, England, 1969, p. 233. 6. Chrysam, M.M., Margarines and spreads, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 3, 5th ed., Hui, Y.H., Ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1996, pp. 67–68, 92–96. 7. Miksta, S.C., Margarines: 100 years of technological and legal progress, JAOCS, 48(4), 169A–180A, 1971. 8. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Volume 3, Part 184, Section 1472, Revised April 1, 1995. 9. Swann, L., Margarine with a heart, Food Process. Mag., Feb 1997, p. 53. 10. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Volume 2, Part 101, Section 83, Revised April 1, 2002. 11. Staff Reporter, Excellent source claim allowed for EPA/DHA combo, Nutra USA Ingred., 5/4/2006. 12. U.S. Federal Register, Food Labeling: Trans Fatty Acids in Nutrition, 68FR41433, July 11, 2003, pp. 134–137. 13. Anon., The Role of Dietary Fat in the Human Health, Publ. 575, National Academy of Sciences, Food and Nutrition Board, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 1958, p. 56. 14. Anon., Dietary Fat and Its Relation to Heart Attacks and Strokes, Circ. 23, American Heart Association, 1961, pp. 133–136. 15. Jolliffe, N., Fats, cholesterol and coronary heart disease, NY State J. Med., 57, 2684– 2691, 1957. 16. Hastert, R.C., Hydrogenation, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E., and Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 189–190. 17. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Vol. 2, Part 101 Food Labeling, Section 9, Revised April 1, 2006.
Margarine
471
18. Kromer, G., U.S. Food Fat Consumption Trends, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C., 1971, p. 27. 19. USDA, Fats and Oils Situation, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C., 1981, 20. Ash, M. and Dohlman, E., Oil Crops Situation and Outlook Yearbook, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 61, 75–76. 21. Charteris, W.P. and Keog, H.M.K., Table spreads: Trends in the European market, J. Soc. Dairy Technol., 44(1), 3, 1991. 22. Margarine Statistics Reports, National Association of Margarine Manufacturers, Washington, D.C., 1960–1996. 23. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Vol. 2, Part 166, Section 110, Margarine, Revised April 1, 2006. 24. Weiss, T.J., Margarine, in Food Oils and Their Uses, 2nd ed., AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1983, p. 190. 25. Slover, H.T. et al., Lipids in margarines and margarine-like foods, JAOCS, 62, 781, 1981. 26. Dunford, N.T., Health benefits and processing of lipid-based nutritionals, Food Technol., 55 (11) 2001, p. 41. 27. Welch, R., FDA Authorizes New Coronary Heart Disease Health Claim For Plant Sterol and Plant Stanol Esters, FDA Talk Paper, Washington, D.C., September 5, 2000. 28. Pantzaris, T.P. and Basiron, Y., The lauric (coconut and palm kernel) oils, in Vegetable Oils in Food Technology Composition, Properties and Uses, Gunstone, F.D., Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2002, pp. 168, 185–187. 29. Pelloso, T., Margarine and spreads, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed Processing and Utilization, Wilson, R.F., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2001, pp. 44–46. 30. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Vol. 2, Part 101 Food Labeling, Subpart D, Section 60 Nutrient content claims for the calorie content of foods, Revised April 1, 2006. 31. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Vol. 2, Part 101, Section 56 Nutrient content claims for “light” or ‘lite,’ Revised April 1, 2006. 32. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Vol. 2, Part 101 Food Labeling, Subpart A, Section 13, Nutrient content claims — general principals, Revised April 1, 2006. 33. Moustafa, A., Consumer and industrial margarines, in Practical Handbook of Soybean Processing and Utilization, Erickson, D.R., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, and United Soybean Board, St. Louis, MO, 1995, pp. 352–353. 34. Advisory Committee, 2005 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Report, Part D: Science Base, Section 4: Fats, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 1–53. 35. Weiderman, L.H., Margarine and margarine oil, formulation and control, JAOCS, 55, 828, 1978. 36. Pedmore, J., Application of modification techniques, in Recent Advances in Chemistry and Technology of Fats and Oils, Hamilton, R.J. and Bhati, A., Eds., Elsevier Applied Science, Essex, U.K., 1987, pp. 175–181. 37. Petreauskaite, V., et al., Physical and chemical properties of trans-free fats produced by chemical interesterification of vegetable oil blends, JAOCS, 75, 1998, pp. 489–493. 38. Going, L.H., Interesterification products and processes, JAOCS, 44, 1967, p. 420A. 39. Thomas, A.E., Fractionation and winterization: Processes and products, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 3, Applewhite, T.H., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1985, pp. 24–36.
472
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
40. Duns, M.L., Palm oil in margarines and shortenings, JAOCS, 62, 1985, pp. 408–410. 41. Young, F.V.K., Palm kernel and coconut oils: Analytical characteristics, process technology and uses, JAOCS, 60, 1983, p. 375. 42. Timms, R.E., Physical properties of mixtures of oils, JAOCS, 62, 1985, p. 247. 43. Pantzaris, T.P. and Basiron, Y., The lauric (coconut and palm kernel) oils, in Vegetable Oils in Food Technology Composition, Properties and Uses, Gunstone, F.D., Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2002, p. 192. 44. Young, F.V.K., Interchangeability of fats and oils, JAOCS, 62, 1985, p. 375.
Chapter 11
Liquid Oils
11.1 INTRODUCTION Clarity at or below ambient or room temperature is the primary characteristic of a liquid oil. Natural vegetable oils that are liquid at room temperature (75°F (±5°F) or 23.9°C (±2.8°C)) in temperate climates contain high levels of unsaturated fatty acids with low melting points. A majority of the unsaturated fatty acids in liquid oils are 18 carbon atom fatty acids. Oleic (C-18:1), a monounsaturated fatty acid, is the most oxidative stable. Linoleic (C-18:2) and linolenic (C-18:3), referred to as polyunsaturates, are deemed essential fatty acids because they cannot be synthesized by the human body and must be supplied in the diet. Three major liquid oil types have developed that maintain different degrees of clarity at and slightly below room temperature in temperate climates. Cooking, salad, and high-stability oils are prepared from vegetable oils that are refined, bleached, and deodorized (RBD) at a minimum, but can also require modification by dewaxing, winterization, hydrogenation, and/or fractionation processes. All of these oil types have one common physical property: they are all clear liquid oils at room temperature. The three types of liquid oils are defined as: • Cooking oil: An edible oil that is liquid and clear at room temperature and may be used for cooking. Cooking oils are used for pan and deep-fat frying and in packaged mixes or wherever a clear, liquid oil has application without refrigeration. Cooking oils may solidify at refrigerator temperatures. • Salad oil: An edible oil that will remain substantially liquid at refrigerator temperatures, about 40°F (4.4°C). The standard evaluation method for a salad oil is the cold-test analysis. A salad oil sample that remains clear after 5 1/2 hours while submerged in an ice bath meets the criterion for a salad oil. Salad oils may be used for cooking, but are low in saturated fatty acids to prevent or delay clouding and graining during refrigeration. • High-stability oil: An edible oil that is liquid at room temperature and has exceptional oxidative or flavor stability. High-stability oils are used for food preparation applications where the functional characteristics of a liquid oil are desired and a long shelf life is required. 473
474
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
11.2 DEVELOPMENT OF LIQUID OILS Climate and availability influenced the eating habits of our ancestors. Inhabitants of central and northern Europe first derived their edible fats almost entirely from wild animals and later from domestic animals. Consequently, their foods developed around the use of solid fats such as butter, lard, and tallow. In the more heavily populated areas of Asia, southern Europe, and Africa, where it was impractical to dedicate land to livestock grazing, diets were developed with vegetable oils as the major fat source. All oil-bearing plants produce oils that are liquid at the prevailing temperatures where the plant grows. Even the tropical oils that are solid at room temperature in cooler climates are liquid oils in the tropical climates where these plants flourish. North America’s preference for animal fats was influenced by the early immigrants who came from northern Europe and adapted large areas of the country to raising domestic animals.1 Fats and oils processors in the United States developed the differentiation between cooking and salad oils. The original intent was to retain fluidity and clarity for cottonseed oil during the colder months; oil fluidity and clarity were not a problem during the warmer summer temperatures. Domestic ice boxes and later refrigerators, along with large-scale commercialization of the mayonnaise and salad dressing industry, increased the need for a liquid oil that remained clear at reduced temperatures. Initially, salad oil was referred to as winter oil as an indication of the fractionation process used to produce the cloud-free oil at cool temperatures. The winterization process evolved from practical experience when it was observed that storing cottonseed oil in outside tanks exposed to low temperatures during the winter months allowed the higher melting triglycerides to settle to the bottom of the tank, leaving a top layer of clear oil. The top layer was decanted, deodorized, packaged, and marketed as a salad oil. The topping process did not provide consistent results because it depended on nature to provide the coolant and, as the popularity of the oil increased, it became impractical to maintain the quantity of oil in storage tanks at the volume and time required. Therefore, mechanically refrigerated chilling and filtering systems were developed to simulate the outside storage and topping process. Salad oil terminology came about because of the application of winter oil to mayonnaise preparation. At the same time, unwinterized oil, which was known as summer oil, became cooking oil.2,3 Salad oil identification later changed from an oil processed by the winterization process to an oil that can meet the requirements of a winter oil: resist clouding for more than 5 1/2 hours at 32°F (0°C). This revised salad oil definition encompassed oils identified as natural winter oils. These oils, which have fatty acid compositions that are high in unsaturates with corresponding low saturated fatty acid levels, do not require winterization to remain clear and brilliant at refrigerator temperatures. Soybean oil is a natural winter oil and does not require fractionation to meet the cold-test requirements. Corn, canola, safflower, and sunflower oils would be natural winter oils, except for waxes that cloud at cool temperatures. These oils are normally dewaxed with a winterization-type process to remove the waxes. Salad oils cannot be prepared from peanut oil because it gels when chilled to the extent that it cannot
Liquid Oils
475
be separated. The saturated fatty acid levels of tropical oils are too high for consideration as salad oils. Liquid oils are consumed as naturally (undeodorized) and artificially flavored oils and as neutral, deodorized products. Olive oil is almost always marketed in the undeodorized form. The natural flavor is an important asset that deodorization would destroy. Soybean, peanut, sunflower, and sesame oils are generally consumed in their crude form in India and China; however, the oil seeds are expressed at low temperatures without previous heat treatment. These cold-pressed methods produce low yields, but the oils have a relatively mild flavor and odor.1 Even though olive oil is growing in popularity as a gourmet oil, consumers in the United States are accustomed to deodorized oils. Cottonseed oil, the only oil consumed in the United States for many years, is so strongly and unpleasantly flavored that deodorization is considered necessary to make it edible. The methods used to separate oils from vegetable seeds involve a cooking, or heating, process before extraction. These methods do not change the stability or nutritive qualities of the oil, but the oils do develop a stronger flavor and odor that are considered objectionable. The higher oil yields compensate for the refining and deodorization expenses required to make the oils palatable. A market has developed for cold-pressed peanut, sesame, safflower, and sunflower oils because of implied nutritional considerations, but no reliable consumption data are available.4 In general, a greater utilization of liquid oils has developed in areas that had been partial to solid fats. Figure 11.1 compares the preference changes for edible fats and oils in the United States beginning in 1950 when liquid oil usage was at a much lower level than that for either shortening or solid fats, as well as the table spreads (butter and margarine).1,5-7 Liquid oil usage more than quadrupled during this period.
45.0 40.0
Lbs per Person
35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
Year Tablespreads
Solid Fats
Figure 11.1 Visible fats and oils consumption changes.
Salad and Cooking Oils
2005
476
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Cooking and salad oil usage surpassed table spreads in 1970 and exceeded solids fat usage in 1999. Most of the reasons this trend has developed are • Global movement of people • Dietary guidelines recommending daily intake of omega-6 (linoleic) fatty acid at 5 to 10% and omega-3 (linolenic) at 0.6 to 1.2%8 • Saturated and trans fatty acids main risk factors for cardiovascular disease • Process improvements for more bland oil flavors with improved oxidative stability • Finished product formulations and process developments to accommodate liquid oils • Emulsifier development that reduced dependence on the crystalline properties of solid fats for functionality • More convenient handling
Consumption of unsaturated vegetable oils has increased significantly as a result of recommendations to decrease and replace saturated and hydrogenated fats with oils high in unsaturated fatty acids. Dietary levels of linoleic fatty acid became excessive with this change causing the over-production of inflammatory oxygenated derivatives. To alleviate this problem, greater consumption of omega-3 fatty acids was recommended because they inhibit eicosanoid metabolism and provide antiaggregatory and antiinflammatory functions. However, omega-3 levels exceeding 1% of calories become risk factors by increasing the oxidative susceptibility of lowdensity lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and other lipoproteins as well as oxidative stress. Therefore, recommendations to increase the levels of omega-3 fatty acids in the diet must by moderated by the serious hazards of their greater susceptibility to oxidation effecting both the stability of foods as well as the oxidative modification of lipoproteins in blood.9 Liquid oils are suitable and preferred for many types of food preparation. That is, when the food is consumed shortly after preparation, for frying foods with high absorption rates providing a rapid turnover, for frozen and refrigerated food preparation, and in other areas where protective packaging is utilized. These application restrictions apply for cooking and salad oils, but high-stability oils have been developed for applications requiring a long-term oxidative stability. The primary characteristics of a high-stability oil are liquidity at room temperature with enhanced oxidative stability while retaining functional and nutritional properties. Two techniques for producing a high-stability oil are (1) hydrogenation followed by fractionation to separate the stearine or hard fraction from the olein fraction that becomes the high-stability oil, or (2) use of plant-breeding techniques to produce oils low in polyunsaturates and high in monounsaturated fatty acids. Both of these techniques are used to produce high-stability liquid oils for use wherever stability and liquidity are the important functional requirements. 11.3 COOKING AND SALAD OIL SOURCES The steady growth in the consumption of cooking and salad oils is evident from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Economic Research Service Oil Crops
Liquid Oils
477
Table 11.1 U.S. Source Oil Usage for Salad and Cooking Oils Millions of pounds Oil Source
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2005
—
—
—
33
515
1143
Corn
247
247
350
636
502
1407
Cottonseed
389
Canola
e
752
527
460
460
304
Olive
51
62
58
213
449
563
Peanut
28
140
148
139
140
115e
e
Safflower
—
12
—
—
—
Soybean
887
2471
4042
4662
7361
8700
Sunflower
—
—
NR
NR
NR
NR
1
5
109
—
61
1966
3464
5167
6143
9192
11.5
15.4
21.2
Unidentified Total Per Capita, lbs
24.1
33.7
—
— 12202 42.6
Notes: NR = none recorded; e = estimated.
Situation and Outlook Reports for domestic consumption of salad or cooking oils; the consumption and source oils data for salad and cooking oils utilized since 1960 are summarized in Table 11.1.5-7 Deodorized cooking and salad oils are principally prepared from soybean, corn, canola, cottonseed, and peanut oils. Cottonseed, corn, and peanut oils can be deodorized to bland neutral products that do not develop exceeding disagreeable flavors upon reversion or oxidation. Conversely, the characteristic oxidized flavor of soybean oil kept it from being an acceptable salad or cooking oil for quite some time. Winterized cottonseed oil was the principal salad oil used in the United States until the late 1950s. Soybean oil surpassed cottonseed oil as the principal vegetable oil in the United States soon after World War II; however, cottonseed oil remained the preferred salad oil source until the flavor and odor deficiencies of soybean oil were addressed. Soybean salad oil with a reduced linolenic fatty acid (C-18:3) was introduced to the U.S. market in the late 1950s and early 1960s. The linolenic fatty acid content was reduced with hydrogenation and, subsequently, winterized to remove the hard fraction created during hydrogenation. This specially processed soybean oil quickly replaced the more expensive cottonseed salad oil as the preferred food processor salad oil and was cautiously introduced to the retail consumer. It became the preferred retail bottled oil during the 1960s.10 In the late 1970s, with improvements in the extraction and processing of soybean oil, processors were able to produce a RBD soybean oil acceptable to industrial customers. This improved oil was introduced to the retail market as “all natural” and “light.” Light indicated the oil appearance that was almost water white. This product quickly replaced the hydrogenated, winterized, and deodorized soybean salad oil sold in retail grocery stores. Improved processing and packaging had provided a more bland flavor stable oil than the soybean oil of the 1930s and 1940s, but the U.S. consumer had also become more accustomed to the soybean oil flavor and odor that made it less objectionable.
478
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Cottonseed oil has a unique flavor property that makes it a desirable frying medium for snack foods. Potato chips fried in cottonseed cooking oil have a pleasant nutty character, whereas other frying oils produce chips with clean potato flavors that lack the nutty note.11 This use for cottonseed cooking oil and other industrial uses of cottonseed salad oil probably account for most of the liquid cottonseed oil usage, as the retail marketing of cottonseed salad oil appears to be limited to the gourmet shelves. Corn oil is second only to soybean oil in salad and cooking oil volume, as well as for other products, and has wide consumer recognition even though it is a byproduct of corn sweetener, starch, meal, and ethanol production. Corn oil has been regarded as having exceptional flavor and quality while obtaining a healthy oil image. Promotion of polyunsaturated oils for nutritional purposes during the 1950s and 1960s exploded the commercial use of corn oil in various foods, for snack frying, and as a retail bottled oil. Corn oil contains 69% linoleic (C-18:2), about 13% saturated fatty acids, and only trace amounts of linolenic (C-18:3) fatty acid. The distinctive musty flavor and odor developed by corn oil has popular acceptance both for home use and for prepared food products, such as fried snacks and mayonnaise or salad dressings. Peanut oil cannot be winterized to produce a salad oil because of the unfilterable gel produced with cooling, thus it is marketed as a cooking oil for both industrial and retail uses. Peanut oil is considered a premium cooking and frying oil because of the pleasant flavor and cost. The oil separated from peanuts maintains the pleasant peanut flavor rather than the meal. Peanuts, and therefore the oil, are subject to mandatory price supports in the United States, which maintains the premium pricing. Nevertheless, peanut oil maintains a respectable cooking oil market for snack and foodservice frying, as well as a retail cooking oil. The increase in U.S. olive oil consumption since 1985 is due, in part, to promotions of the health benefits of Mediterranean dietary patterns and to market expansion from gourmet shops into supermarkets. The high monounsaturates of olive oil are being promoted by some nutritionists as being healthful. Olive oil, produced by crushing and pressing olives, has a high-oleic fatty acid (C-18:1) content ranging from 55 to 83%. The Mediterranean diet is based on the findings of a Harvard University Press study12 that concluded that the adult populations of countries, such as Greece and Italy, live longer. This diet allows 25 to 35% of its calories to come from fat as long as that fat is olive oil. This study linked olive oil with lowering LDL (problem) cholesterol levels while maintaining high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (good) cholesterol levels. However, these results have not been observed on a consistent basis and, therefore, are questioned by some researchers.12,13 Canola oil has been offered for sale in the United States since 1985, when it was approved as generally recognized as safe (GRAS). Initial campaigns promoting it as a “healthy oil” were fruitful; this oil captured over 12% of the salad and cooking oil market and the volume continues to grow. Canola oil may be the most nutritionally balanced cooking or salad oil of all the major culinary oils. It is low in saturated fatty acids; typically it contains 6 to 7% saturated fatty acids, the lowest level of all nongenetically modified vegetable oils. It has a high monounsaturated fatty acid content, oleic (C-18:1), which has been shown to reduce LDL cholesterol without impacting
Liquid Oils
479
HDL cholesterol levels. It is a good source of α-linolenic (C-18:3) omega-3 fatty acid, an essential fatty acid that reduces all cause mortality and various cardiovascular disease events. And finally canola oil contains the nutritionally preferred balance of omega-6 to omega-3 essential fatty acids, a 2 to 1 ratio.14 Retail salad oil bottlers have attempted to create a market for sunflower oil on several occasions. In the early 1990s, the major branded retail salad oil producers introduced sunflower oil nationally; however, the volume generated has not been identified by the USDA in the Fats and Oils Situation and Outlook Reports to avoid disclosure of individual producer’s volume. Canola oil, introduced as a retail bottled oil, appeared to replace most of the national market for sunflower oil. Then, sunflower oil became one of the components of the blended salad oils introduced in 1991 with a third less saturates than soybean oil. These oils were a blend of soybean, sunflower, and canola oils with a 10% saturated fatty acid content.15 Blended vegetable oils are still marketed, but the saturates are reduced to 5 to 8% using blends of canola and corn, canola and soybean, soybean and canola, or canola, sunflower, and soybean oils. The Nutritional Labeling and Education Act, effective May 1994, specified the information allowed on food labels. The mandatory listings on the nutritional facts panel that pertain to the content of fats and oils are serving size, servings per container, total calories, calories from fat, total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, and vitamin A. The voluntary components, which may refer to fats and oils products, include calories from fats, potassium, and other essential vitamins and minerals. Trans-isomers were added to the mandatory listing on the nutritional facts panel effective January 1, 2006. Typical nutritional facts information for five major salad oils is tabulated in Table 11.2. 11.4 RETAIL CONSUMER OILS None of the retail consumer oils currently available have been modified chemically to change the physical characteristics. Processing for most of the household bottled oils is merely refining, bleaching, and deodorization, except for winterization for cottonseed salad oil and dewaxing for canola, corn, sunflower, and safflower oils. Additionally, most of the household oils meet the requirements of a salad oil except for peanut and olive oils. These consumer oils will become a semisolid at refrigerator temperatures. The broad dietary shift from animal fats that began in 1950 has favored liquid oil products. The U.S. consumer has become increasingly aware of the role of fats and oils in coronary disease. As a result, consumers have replaced solid shortenings with liquid oils. The oils favored by consumers have tended to reflect the findings of the most recent studies. Initially, when polyunsaturated oils were found to be useful in lowering serum cholesterol, corn oil began its rise in popularity. Reports that monounsaturates were equal to polyunsaturates in lowering serum cholesterol appeared to help peanut and olive oil sales. The Mediterranean diet helped improve the sales of olive oil. Canola oil introductions capitalized on its low saturate level
480
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 11.2 Typical Nutritional Facts Panel Information for 5 Major Salad Oils Salad Oil
Soybean
Canola
Corn
Sunflower
Cottonseed
7.2
26.0
Typical Fatty Acid Composition* Saturated fatty acids, % Trans fatty acids, % Monounsaturated fatty acids, %
15.4
13.5
12.7
0d
0d
0d
0d
0d
23.4
62.9
25.6
18.9
18.0
Omega-3 fatty acids, %
7.6
8.8
1.2
0.8
0.2
Omega-6 fatty acids, %
53.7
21.0
59.6
67.5
55.8
Nutritional Facts Actual Calculations: Servings, tablespoons Calories per serving Total fat, grams
1
1
1
1
1
123
123
123
123
123
14
14
14
14
14
Saturated fatty acids, grams
2.2
1.0
1.9
1.8
3.6
Trans fatty acids, grams
0d
0d
0d
0d
0d
Polyunsaturated fatty acids, grams
8.6
8.8
3.6
2.6
7.9
Monounsaturated fatty acids, grams
3.3
4.2
8.5
9.6
2.5
Cholesterol, milligrams
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
120
120
120
120
120
14
14
14
14
14
Nutritional Facts Rounded Declarations: Servings, tablespoons Calories per serving Total fat, grams Saturated fatty acids, grams
2.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
3.5
Trans fatty acids, grams
0d
0d
0d
0d
0d
Polyunsaturated fatty acids, grams
9.0
9.0
3.5
2.5
8.0
Monounsaturated fatty acids, grams
3.5
4.0
9.0
10.0
2.5
Cholesterol, milligrams
0
0
0
0
0
Notes: d = with careful deodorization; * = see chapters 1 and 2.
(i.e., 94% saturate free). In 1991, an oil composed of soybean, sunflower, and canola oils blended to one third the saturate level of soybean oil was introduced.16 As discussed earlier, blended retail oils are still available, but the blends are either canola and soybean or canola and corn oils. The packaging materials and practices employed for retail liquid oils are very important contributors to shelf life. The package contains and protects the product from oxidation and other contaminants, beginning at the point of manufacture
Liquid Oils
481
and continuing through usage by the consumer. The ideal retail container has three important attributes: product protection, product appeal, and cost effectiveness. Currently, most of the regular consumer retail oils are packaged in clear, polyethylene tetraphthalate (PET), rectangular-shaped containers that hold 16, 24, 32, 48, or 64 ounces, as well as 1-gallon polyvinylchloride (PVC) opaque jugs. However, many of the gourmet and specialty oils are still packaged in glass containers with sizes and shapes readily distinguishable from conventional retail oils. Before the mid-1980s, all consumer oils were packaged in glass containers for product protection. Early testing in 1955 of polyethylene (PE) containers, the only food-grade plastic available at the time, revealed oxygen permeability, which allowed the oil to oxidize rapidly; the container became sticky as the oil permeated it, and the polymers from the bottle migrated into the oil. Later, a food-grade PVC resin became available that satisfied most of the retail bottled oil criteria.16 USDA research in 1973 showed no differences in oil deterioration between glass and PVC packaging. The results of this research had a significant effect on the edible-oil industry, which converted almost all consumer oil containers to the translucent plastic bottles by 1985.17 The next generation of plastic containers for consumer oils, PET, is currently on the grocery store shelves. This plastic is more glass-like in clarity, is shatter resistant, and provides a better oxygen barrier. The rectangle shape is a departure from the traditional round bottle to provide better space utilization in shipping containers, on the grocery store shelves, and in the consumer’s pantry. All liquid oils are sensitive to sunlight and fluorescent lighting, which catalyze oxidative reactions. It has been proven that packaging in metal, foil-lined, waxed, paperboard containers, or in tinted or amber glass, extends the shelf-life stability of liquid oils.18 However, retail consumers have indicated a preference for clear containers. When U.S. retail oil bottlers attempted to improve the oxidative stability of the product through the use of the described protective packaging, they suffered reduced sales until the container was changed back to clear glass or plastic.19 Nitrogen gas sparging of the oil and container head space blanketing to exclude oxygen have been used effectively to prolong the shelf life of the oils. Oxidative deterioration has been shown to correlate directly with the amount of oxygen available to react with the oil.18 Unfortunately, the nitrogen protection is eliminated when the consumer opens the container. 11.5 INDUSTRIAL SALAD OIL APPLICATIONS Salad oils are the major ingredient in most dressing products, which include mayonnaise, spoonable salad dressing, and pourable salad dressings. Salad oils contribute lubricity and a creamy, pleasant mouth feel to dressings of all types. Other functions of salad oils include the solubilization of oil-soluble flavors and contribution of an overall balanced flavor profile. The predominate salad oils in the United States have been cottonseed, corn, and soybean oil. Cottonseed oil requires winterization to remove the hard fractions to remain clear at refrigerator temperatures. Corn oil must be dewaxed to remove waxes
482
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
that cloud at room temperature. Soybean oil is a natural winter oil and requires only minimal processing, refining, bleaching, and deodorization before use as a salad oil. Soybean oil has the advantage of requiring the least processing and being the lowestcost source oil, so it has become the dominant industrial salad oil. Canola oil has generated interest because it is lower in saturates, has the ideal balance of linolenic to linoleic essential fatty acids, and a good oxidative stability due to its high oleic fatty acid content. Salad oils are required for dressings, sauces, and other food products prepared or stored at cool temperatures that require a liquid oil. The major salad oil applications are salad dressings (i.e., mayonnaise, spoonable salad dressing, and pourable and separating salad dressings). These products all require high levels of salad oil in the formula (i.e., 30 to 80%). Salad oils are also used for other prepared saucetype products that may be refrigerated, causing the emulsion to break and develop an oil layer. Other uses are where a liquid oil is desirable for a particular application or appearance. 11.6 MAYONNAISE Mayonnaise, the most prominent savory dressing with a high oil content, is an oil-in-water emulsion. It is used both in homes and in restaurants for preparing sandwiches, salads, and similar cold dishes. An emulsion is a mixture of two liquids, one being dispersed as globules in the other. The liquids must be immiscible in each other, incapable of forming a uniform mixture. The liquid that is broken into globules is termed the dispersed phase, whereas the liquid surrounding the globules is known as the continuous phase. In mayonnaise, salad oil is the dispersed phase, vinegar and water are the continuous phase, and egg yolk is the emulsifying agent. Salt and sugar are dissolved in the water and vinegar, and the spices are held in suspension in the water phase. Oil separation occurs in mayonnaise when the egg yolk films are broken, allowing the oil droplets to run together. The emulsion is most often broken by shaking or jarring, heat, evaporation, or freezing. The French are responsible for introducing mayonnaise to America during the 19th century. It had been preferred as a condiment since the days of Louis XIV. Initially, mayonnaise was limited to home or restaurant preparation because the dressing would separate after standing for short periods. It was first manufactured commercially during the early part of the 20th century,20 and a U.S. Standard of Identity was established for mayonnaise in 1928.21 These standards have been revised from time to time, but recent requirements include:22 • Oil: At least 65% of one or a blend of two or more edible vegetable oils; the oil may contain oxystearin, lecithin, or polyglycerol ester to inhibit crystal formation. • Acidifying ingredient: One or both of the following: (1) vinegar diluted with water to an acidity, calculated as acetic acid, of not less than 2.5% acidity, by weight or vinegar mixed with citric acid, provided the citric acid does not account for more than 25% of the vinegar calculated as acetic acid; and (2) lemon, lime, or both
Liquid Oils
483
juices, fresh, dried, frozen, canned, or concentrated and diluted with water to an acidity calculated as acetic acid of not less than 2.5% by weight of the product. • Egg yolk-containing ingredient: Liquid, frozen, or dried egg yolks; liquid, frozen, or dried whole eggs; or either, mixed with liquid or frozen egg whites. No minimum requirement is stated. • Optional ingredients: Mayonnaise may also contain salt, nutritive carbohydrate sweeteners (which would include sugar, dextrose, corn syrup, honey, and other syrups), monosodium glutamate, and any spice, except saffron or turmeric, or natural flavoring, provided egg yolk color is not simulated. Sequestrants, including, but not limited to, calcium disodium and disodium EDTA (ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid), may be added to preserve color or flavor.
11.6.1 Mayonnaise Ingredients Each mayonnaise ingredient has a specific function to achieve the desired characteristics. Mayonnaise must have a pleasing and desirable flavor, consistency, and appearance that are acceptable to a majority of the consumers. The ingredients must resist separation due to abuse and cool temperatures and they must have extended keeping qualities or oxidative stability. The proportions of oil and egg are balanced to obtain body, viscosity, and texture within the limitations of formulation, mixing procedures, and equipment. Salt, vinegar, and spices provide flavor; however, the emulsion type also affects flavor perception. A tight emulsion masks flavors to provide a mild flavor sensation, whereas a loose emulsion will release the flavors quickly to emphasize tartness, sweetness, or saltiness with a different intensity. 11.6.1.1 Salad Oil Mayonnaise must contain 65% liquid oil to conform to the U.S. Standard of Identity; however, the producers use higher levels to obtain the desired consistency. Most mayonnaise is prepared with the oil content in the 75 to 82% range. Usually, the viscosity of the finished mayonnaise increases as the oil content is elevated. Oil levels of 80 to 84% make a thick, heavy-bodied mayonnaise that is preferred for foodservice use because it does not soak into bread or soften and flow over salads. Oil levels in excess of 84% will overload the system to cause emulsion stability problems.23 Because salad oil is the major ingredient, mayonnaise quality depends heavily on the oil quality. The most commonly used salad oil is RBD soybean oil, which has the advantage of requiring the least amount of processing, and it is usually the most economical source oil even before processing. Other salad oils, including winterized cottonseed oil; dewaxed corn, safflower, and sunflower oils; RBD canola oil; or partially hydrogenated and winterized soybean and canola oils, may be used to produce mayonnaise. Oils high in saturated fatty acids or oils that solidify at refrigerator temperatures are seldom used because they cause the emulsion to break at refrigerator temperatures. Table 11.3 compares the quality parameters for the salad oils that are available for use in the United States. Each analytical result indicates the suitability of the salad oil for a particular effect on the finished mayonnaise:
484
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 11.3 Salad Oil: Quality Assessment Characteristics Processing
Source Oil
Refined, Bleached, Deodorized
Refined, Bleached, Dewaxed, Deodorized
Soybean
Canola
Corn
Lovibond red color, max.
1.5
1.5
3.0
1.5
3.0
Free fatty acid, % max.
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
Peroxide value, meq/kg Flavor Iodine value AOM stability, hours min. Cold test, hours min.
Sunflower
Refined, Bleached, Winterized, Deodorized
1.0
Cottonseed
1.0
1.0
1.0
bland
bland
slight corn
bland
bland
1.0
130 ± 5
118 ± 8
125 ± 3
135 ± 5
108 ± 8
8
18
18
11
15
20
10
20
20
10 24.7
Typical Fatty Acid Composition* Saturated fatty acids, % Trans fatty acids, % Monounsaturated fatty acids, %
15.4
13.5
12.7
0d
0d
7.2
0d
0d
0d
23.4
62.9
25.6
18.9
21.2
Omega-3 fatty acids, %
7.6
8.8
1.2
0.8
0.2
Omega-6 fatty acids, %
53.7
21.0
59.6
67.5
53.9
Notes: AOM = active oxygen method; min = minimum; d = with careful deodorization; max = maximum; meq/ kg = milliequivalents per kilogram; * = see chapter 1.
• Lovibond red color: Salad oil colors are relatively light and do not impart any appreciable color to mayonnaise; however, a dark-colored oil of 3.0 Lovibond red is acceptable, as a yellow color is desired in the finished product. • Free fatty acid: High free fatty acid (FFA) levels are an indication of the process quality control. Well deodorized oils have a FFA level of less than 0.055%, which should be maintained until the salad oil is either heat abused or catalyzed with moisture or mineral acid. Using salad oil with a high FFA will effect a tighter emulsion because of a higher α-monoglyceride content. • Peroxide value: Oxidation is a major cause of poor oil flavors. Peroxide value is one of the most widely used chemical tests for determining the quality of fats and oils; it has a good correlation with organoleptic flavor evaluations. However, a peroxide determination does not provide a full and unqualified evaluation of oil quality because of the peroxide transitory nature and their breakdown to nonperoxide materials. Therefore, high peroxide values usually mean poor flavor ratings, but a low peroxide value is not always an indication of a good flavor. • Flavor: Organoleptic or taste evaluations will always be the final assessment of oil quality. Flavor reversion is most prevalent with oils high in polyunsaturates, which describes all of the salad oils used for mayonnaise. Flavor testing of the salad oils provides a preview of the oil flavor that the consumer will experience when the produce is consumed and can identify off-flavors that the analytical evaluations may not uncover. • Iodine value: The iodine value is a simple and rapidly determined chemical constant that measures the unsaturation of a fat or oil. The higher the iodine value the more unsaturated the oil, thus it is an indicator of the oxidative stability of the salad oil. • AOM stability: The oxidative stability of the salad oil will determine whether the mayonnaise will have an acceptable flavor for the desired shelf life. The active
Liquid Oils
485
oxygen method (AOM) is a measure of the oxidative stability of the salad oil. The longer that an oil can survive AOM abuse before reaching the 100 peroxide endpoint, the longer it will retain an acceptable flavor. • Cold test: A salad oil must resist clouding at refrigerator temperatures to prevent the mayonnaise emulsion from breaking and allowing the oil to separate. Obviously, longer cold-test results indicate that the emulsion stability of the finished product will be maintained for a longer period than an oil with a low cold test. • Saturates: Saturated fat is a mandatory component of the nutritional panel for food products. This information is intended to help consumers decide how individual foods fit within a diet based on 2000 kilocalories/day. The saturate level can be monitored with fatty-acid composition evaluations. • Trans fatty acids: Most liquid oils should be trans-free, but high polyunsaturated oils are particularly sensitive to trans isomerization during deodorization; heat generated isomerization is highest for linoleic and the lowest for oleic fatty acid.
11.6.1.2 Vinegar When mayonnaise was made at the table by the host just before it was placed on the salad, keeping qualities were not important. Vinegar was used for its flavor. Today, the role of vinegar as a preservative to protect against microbial spoilage is as important in mayonnaise as the flavor it contributes. The tart flavor and preserving characteristics of vinegar are obtained from the acetic acid it contains. Distilled vinegar is usually available to dressing processors at 50- or 100-grain strength, with each 10 grains being equal to 1% acetic acid. The higher strength vinegar may be diluted with water to attain the concentration or acetic acid equivalent desired. Distilled vinegars do not all have equivalent flavors. The flavor can vary among producers because of oxidation of the alcohol, and cider, malt, and wine vinegars have unique flavors that are distinguishable in the finished mayonnaise. Vinegar may also contain high quantities of trace metals that can be detrimental to the oxidative stability of the oil in the finished mayonnaise. 11.6.1.3 Eggs One of the most important ingredients in mayonnaise is eggs. Egg yolk contributes the surface-active agents, lecithin and cholesterol, and the egg protein aids in emulsification by forming a solid gel structure when coagulated by the acid component. Almost all mayonnaise manufacturers use frozen and salted egg yolks.20 Eggs also contribute to the flavor and color of the finished mayonnaise. Much of the creaminess and richness of mayonnaise is obtained from the combination of oil and eggs in the formulation. 11.6.1.4 Flavoring Ingredients The remainder of the ingredients in mayonnaise are added for their flavor contributions.
486
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
• Salt: In mayonnaise, salt enhances flavor, it is a preservative, and it stabilizes the emulsion. The amount of salt required for preservation will vary with the amount of moisture and egg yolk in the mayonnaise formulation. The usual range of salt is 1.2 to 1.8%. In most cases, flavor will be the limiting factor of the amount of salt used; for the other functions, a greater danger exists with the use of too little salt rather than too much. • Sugar: Many hotel and restaurant chefs do not use sugar in their mayonnaise dressings prepared fresh just prior to serving; however, most commercial mayonnaise contains sugar to provide a slightly sweet flavor to balance the tart flavor from the vinegar. • Mustard: Mustard is probably the most important spice used in mayonnaise. Mustard has been added to mayonnaise in flour or oil form. Some developers believe that mustard flour has emulsifying properties, but others dispute this theory. Mustard is used chiefly for flavor, although mustard flour does add slightly to the color of the mayonnaise. • Pepper: White pepper has been preferred over black pepper because of the black specks resulting from the dark spice. White pepper is added for flavor. • Paprika: Oleoresin paprika is added to mayonnaise principally for color. It has a characteristic hot or mild flavor and odor, depending on the source. The mild product is usually used in mayonnaise and is effective for color addition, but the paprika flavor is too mild to be noticeable at the levels used.
11.6.2 Mayonnaise Processing Most emulsions tend to form with the major ingredient in the continuous phase and the minor ingredient in the dispersed phase. The mayonnaise emulsion is just the opposite, which makes it a difficult emulsion to prepare. A mayonnaise emulsion breaks when it reverses to the stable form where the oil becomes the continuous phase, and the aqueous phase is discontinuous although not dispersed. Batch or continuous processing methods are used to produce mayonnaise. The classic batch system disperses the dry ingredients into beaten eggs along with half of the vinegar/water mixture. Then, the oil and remaining vinegar/water mixture are added simultaneously in separate streams. The oil addition should be completed slightly before the vinegar/water mixture. After all the ingredients are added, the emulsion is mixed one minute at low speed before filling. Two-stage continuous mayonnaise production involves the preparation of a premix somewhat like the batch preparation sequence. The premix may be prepared as a batch or with metering pumps, leading to an inline mixer or preemulsifier. The premix emulsion is then homogenized with a high-speed mixer or a colloid mill. Other continuous systems are one-stage systems utilizing different sequences to produce smooth, stable emulsions. The temperature of the oil and other materials during mixing influences the body, viscosity, and stability of the mayonnaise. If the salad oil and the other ingredients are too warm when incorporated into the emulsion, the finished mayonnaise will have a poorer stability and thinner consistency than those prepared with cool ingredients. The recommended ideal temperature varies from 40°F (4.4°C) to as
Liquid Oils
487
high as 70°F (21.1°C). Emulsion failures are almost assured with finished mayonnaise temperatures above 75°F (23.9°C).1,21,23 11.7 SPOONABLE SALAD DRESSING Spoonable salad dressing refers to a product that is similar in appearance to mayonnaise, is somewhat similar in taste, and is often confused with the more costly product. Spoonable salad dressing was developed as a low-cost alternative for mayonnaise during the depression years. Salad dressing is tart and tangy, whereas mayonnaise is relatively bland with a more subtle flavor. Mayonnaise and salad dressing are used interchangeably on sandwiches, salads, and as a condiment for various foods. The spoonable salad dressing market is divided by flavor preference of one product over the other, which is usually not quality or cost related. U.S. government standards were defined for both salad dressing and mayonnaise in 1928 to relieve the confusion caused by the lack of uniformity of the dressing products. The Standard of Identity was finally promulgated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and adopted in 1950.20,21 Salad dressing is defined as an emulsified semisolid food containing the following:22 • Salad oil: At least 30% by weight of vegetable oil or a blend of oils; the vegetable oil may contain an optional crystal inhibitor including, but not limited to, oxystearin, lecithin, or polyglycerol esters of fatty acids. • Starchy paste: A cooked or partially cooked starch paste prepared with a food starch, modified food starch, tapioca flour, wheat flour, rye flour, or any two or more of these; water may be used to make the paste. • Acidifying ingredient: One or both of the following: (1) any vinegar, vinegar/water mixture, or vinegar/citric or malic acid mixture, providing the weight of the citric acid is not more than 25% of the weight of the acetic acid in the vinegar (any blend of vinegars may be used and considered as vinegar); and (2) lemon or lime juices in any appropriate form which may be diluted with water. • Egg yolk-containing ingredient: One of more of the following in an amount to be equivalent to at least 4% by weight of liquid egg yolks: liquid, frozen, or dried egg yolks; liquid, frozen, or dried whole eggs; or either, mixed with liquid or frozen egg whites. • Optional ingredients: Salad dressing may also contain salt; nutritive carbohydrate sweeteners; monosodium glutamate; stabilizers and thickeners; and any spice, except saffron or turmeric, or flavoring, provided egg yolk color is not simulated. Sequestrants, including, but not limited to, EDTA, may be added to preserve color and flavor. • Protected atmosphere: Salad dressing may be mixed and packed in an atmosphere in which air is replaced in whole or in part by carbon dioxide or nitrogen.
Addition of a starch paste distinguishes salad dressing from mayonnaise; otherwise, most of the ingredients are common with the two spoonable dressings. Salad dressing may vary in oil content from the lower quality products of 30 to 35% oil to the higher quality dressings of 40 to 50% oil. Liquid oils for salad dressings are selected using the same criteria as for mayonnaise. Oil modifies the mouth feel of
488
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
the starch paste, making it smoother and richer. Oil content is not the major source of viscosity and body in salad dressing. This function is controlled by the type and amount of starch used. Starch paste must be increased when egg and oil levels are decreased, which also necessitates a change in the acidity and sugar content to provide stability and flavor balance. Improvements in flavor, body, texture, and stability are achieved by increasing the oil content because this change brings salad dressing closer to the characteristics of mayonnaise. Preparation of the starch paste to be mixed with the egg and oil components is the first step in the production of a salad dressing. This preparation is one of the most critical elements in the entire process. The ingredients in the starch-pasted formulation must be balanced for the correct relationship to produce the desired salad dressing. Fermentation is the most serious form of spoilage encountered with salad dressings. Sufficient levels of vinegar, salt, and sugar are necessary to avoid fermentation of the salad dressing. The acetic acid level should be 0.90 to 0.928% to provide a pH below 4.0 to destroy Salmonella and Staphylococcus.20 The minimum amount of salt is 1.5% by weight. Excessive tartness resulting from the large amount of vinegar and saltiness from the salt are overcome to a degree through the use of a high percentage of sweetener. It is not uncommon for a salad dressing to contain the equivalent of as much as 10% sugar. Salad dressing is more highly seasoned than mayonnaise, and the choice of spice forms is more critical. Starch paste is affected by proteins from spices and egg whites, which act as emulsifiers when coagulated by the acid in salad dressing. The proteins disperse with milling to modify the starch texture to produce a drier, less pasty dressing. The procedure used for cooking the starch paste also has a great deal to do with the keeping quality of the finished salad dressing. The starch paste is frequently the problem source when careful control of cooking, cooling, and handling are not observed. Undercooking of the starch paste produces a thin unstable product with the potential to ferment, whereas overcooking leads to a combination of varying viscosity and instability. Many cooking and cooling procedures have been used, from batch steam-jacketed kettles and water-jacketed coolers to continuous cooking and cooling of the paste. Cooking temperature depends on the equipment, amount of agitation, starch type, and whether or not sugar and vinegar are a part of the paste. One constant is that the paste must be rapidly cooled to 90°F (32.2°C). Preparation of the salad dressing after the starch has been produced is essentially the same as for mayonnaise. The starch paste is blended with a modified mayonnaise base to produce the finished spoonable salad dressing. Packaging and handling of the salad dressing are also the same as for mayonnaise. 11.8 POURABLE SALAD DRESSINGS A huge variety of separating and emulsified pourable salad dressings are available on grocery store shelves and from foodservice distributors. This salad dressing category originally was introduced in limited flavors. French dressing was one of the very early varieties and has the distinction of being the only pourable salad dressing covered by a U.S. Standard of Identity. No other pourable salad dressing is limited by a standard, but all must still utilize ingredients recognized as safe by the FDA. Most
Liquid Oils
489
pourable salad dressings are formulated with relatively high vinegar, or acetic acid, and salt levels to prevent fermentation during distribution and use at ambient temperature. Pourable salad dressings are produced in two different finished product forms: separating and emulsified. Separating salad dressings have a separate oil phase above an aqueous phase. In many cases, the two phases are prepared separately and filled into the container as two separate products. These products must be shaken before use and separate quickly after pouring. Some separating salad dressings use an emulsifier, such as polysorbate 60, to help retain the shaken emulsion slightly longer to dispense a more uniform dressing. The most popular separating salad dressing variety is the Italian flavor. Emulsified or one-phase pourable salad dressings can be homogenized or blended to maintain the creamy nonseparating consistency. Homogenization reduces the oil droplet size to produce the smooth, creamy dressing. Blended dressings are stabilized and thickened with gums. Green Goddess dressing, the first homogenized salad dressing in the category, was introduced in 1964. Most of the single-phase pourable salad dressings are now emulsified by homogenization rather than relying on gums to provide and hold the emulsion together. Other homogenized pourable salad dressings now include Ranch or Buttermilk, Creamy Italian, Caesar, and Russian, among others. 11.8.1 French Dressing French dressing is the only pourable dressing covered by a U.S. Standard of Identity. To be marketed as French dressing, the product must meet the requirements of 21 CFR 169.115.22 French dressing is the separable liquid food dressing or the emulsified viscous fluid food dressing prepared from: • Salad oil: Not less than 35% of vegetable oil; the salad oils may contain crystal inhibitors, including, but not limited to, oxystearin, lecithin, or polyglycerol esters. • Acidifying ingredient: One of both of the following: (1) any vinegar, vinegar/water mixture, or vinegar/citric or malic acid mixture, providing the weight of the citric acid is not more than 25% of the weight of the acetic acid in the vinegar (any blend of vinegars may be used and considered as vinegar); (2) lemon or lime juices in any appropriate form which may be diluted with water. • Optional ingredients: French dressing may also contain salt, nutritive carbohydrate sweeteners, spices or natural flavorings, monosodium glutamate, tomato paste, tomato puree, catsup or sherry wine, eggs and ingredients derived from eggs, additives that impart the traditionally expected color, stabilizers, and thickeners. Sequestrants, including, but not limited to, calcium disodium EDTA or disodium EDTA, may be used to preserve color and flavor. Calcium carbonate, sodium hexametaphosphate, without restriction, or dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate at 0.5% of the thickener or stabilizer weight maximum may be added as solubilizing agents. • Protected atmosphere: French dressing may be mixed and packed in an atmosphere in which air is replaced in whole or in part by carbon dioxide or nitrogen.
French dressings normally contain 55 to 65% salad oil, even though the standard requires only 35%, to achieve the preferred mouth feel. The gums or stabilizers used
490
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
are more prominent at lower salad oil levels, which can produce a slimy character instead of the creamy, pleasant mouth feel experienced with higher oil levels. 11.9 HIGH-STABILITY OILS Typically, liquid oils do not possess an oxidative stability capable of satisfying the shelf-life requirements of prepared foods; however, the primary characteristics of a high-stability oil are liquidity at ambient temperatures and resistance to oxidation. Most vegetable oils that are liquid at room temperature generally contain high polyunsaturated fatty acid levels. Polyunsaturated fatty acids have low melting points for liquidity, but are also extremely susceptible to oxidation, hence, most liquid oil applications are limited to products where extended shelf life is not a prerequisite. Two techniques have been developed to enhance the stability of liquid oils while retaining functional and nutritional properties: (1) hydrogenation and fractionation to separate the stearin or hard fraction from the olein or soft fraction, which becomes the highstability oil; and (2) the use of plant-breeding techniques to produce liquid oils with low polyunsaturate and saturate levels, but very high monounsaturated fatty acid levels.24 Table 11.4 compares three commercially available high-stability oils produced by these techniques. All the oils have high-oleic fatty acid contents with relatively low saturated fatty acids, which provides high stability and liquidity. 11.9.1 Processed High-Stability Oils Hydrogenation saturates the double bonds to convert linolenic (C-18:3) to linoleic (C-18:2) and linoleic to oleic (C-18:1) fatty acid. Preferably, the reaction could be stopped after converting all the polyunsaturated fatty acids to monounsaturates; however, the hydrogenation process is not selective enough to target only certain double bonds to saturate. Therefore, while saturating the polyunsaturates, significant levels of stearic fatty acid with a high melting point are also produced. Increased higher melting stearic fractions produce an oil that is more oxidatively stable, but is no longer a clear liquid at ambient temperatures. It is necessary to physically remove the high-melting hard fractions to regain the liquidity desired for high-stability liquid oils. Fractionation techniques involve separation of the solid and liquid triglycerides on the basis of melting point differences. The olein fraction, containing a high level of oleic fatty acid, becomes the high-stability oil. Several fractionation methods are practiced: (1) winterization, a form of dry fractionation; (2) detergent fractionation; and (3) solvent fractionation. A liquid oil fractionation benefit is that the naturally occurring antioxidants, tocopherols, are concentrated in the olein or liquid fractions to further improve oxidation protection. 11.9.2 Plant Breeding Genetic engineering is a powerful tool that has the potential to create novel oil compositions. High-stability oils have been developed with this technology for most of the oilseed varieties; high-oleic sunflower and safflower are commercially amiable. Table 11.3 compares the characteristics of processed and genetically modified,
Liquid Oils
491
Table 11.4 High-Stability Liquid Oils Modification Technique Processing
Source Oils
Processing
Plant Breeding
Refined, Bleached, Hydrogenated, Winterized, and Deodorized
Refined, Bleached, Hydrogenated, Solvent Fractionated, & Deodorized
Soybean
Soybean and Cottonseed
Refined, Bleached, and Deodorized High-Oleic Safflower
High-Oleic Sunflower
High-Oleic Canola
—
Fatty Acid Composition, % C-12:0 Lauric
—
1.0
—
—
C-14:0 Myristic
—
1.0
0.1
—
—
C-16:0 Palmitic
9.0
9.0
3.6
4.0
3.6
C-16:1 Palmitoleic
—
1.0
—
—
0.6
C-17:0 Margaric
—
—
—
—
0.3
3.8
5.0
5.2
4.0
4.7
C-18:0 Stearic C-18:1 Oleic
63.0
78.0
81.5
80.0
85.7
C-18:2 Linoleic
22.0
5.0
7.3
9.0
2.1
C-18:3 Linolenic
1.0
trace
0.1
trace
0.1 0.7
C-20:0 Arachidic
—
—
0.4
0.5
C-20:1 Gadoleic
—
—
—
—
1.7
C-22:0 Behenic
—
—
0.3
1.0
0.3
C-22:1 Erucic Oxidative stability rating* Iodine value
—
—
—
—
0.2
3.0
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.2
92.0±
78.0±
82.0±
85.0±
78.0±
Notes: * 1 = Best, 10 = Poorest (see chapter 4, Table 4.2).
high-stability oils. All of these oils have low saturate levels. These oils resemble olive oil more than most U.S. domestic vegetable oils; the high oleic content produces a high viscosity. The genetic engineering technology is an alternative to hydrogenation or fractionation processing with the advantage of having a low saturate, high monounsaturate, and low trans fatty acid content. 11.9.3 High-Stability Oil Applications High-stability oils, produced with either technology, can be used wherever liquidity and oxidative stability influence the quality or handling conditions of the finished product. Functions of monounsaturated oils include the following: • Frying oils: A high proportion of monounsaturates increases frying stability by limiting the opportunities for oxidation and polymerization. High-stability oils
492
•
•
•
• •
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
have exhibited frying stability results close to those of the selectively hydrogenated heavy-duty frying shortenings. Protective barrier or spray oil: When applied to the surface of food products, high-stability oils protect the product from moisture and oxygen invasion, prevent clumping, and impart a glossy appearance. Specific applications include raisins and other fruits, breakfast cereals, nutmeats, snacks, croutons, bread crumbs, crackers, spices, and seasonings. Product carriers: Color, spices, flavors, and other additives may be blended in the high-stability oils to preserve the flavor, color, or activity during extended storage without fear of off-flavor development or fluidity loss. Pan release agents: Both aerosol and brushed lubricants for baking pans, confectionery, and other food products benefit from the liquidity and oxidative stability of high-stability oils. Food-grade lubricant: High-stability oils are an alternative to mineral oil for lubrication of equipment that may come into contact with food products. Compatibility: High-stability oils are compatible with all types of fats and oils because crystal type is not a concern; liquid oils do not have a crystal structure.
REFERENCES
1. Mattil, K.F., Cooking and salad oils and salad dressings, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 3rd ed., Swern, D., Ed., Interscience, New York, 1964, pp. 249–263. 2. Neumunz, G.M., Old and new in winterizing, JAOCS, 55, 396A–398A, 1978. 3. Weiss, T.J., Salad oil manufacture and control, JAOCS, 44, 146A–148A, 1967. 4. Krishmaurthy, R.G. and Witte, V.C., Cooking oils, salad oils, and oil based dressings, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 5th ed., Vol. 3, Hui, Y.H., Ed., WileyInterscience, New York, 1996, p. 195. 5. Kromer, G., U.S. Food Fat Consumption Trends, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C., 1971. 6. USDA, Fats and Oils Situation, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C., 1981. 7. Ash, M. and Dohlman, E., Oil Crops Situation and Outlook Yearbook, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C., 2007. 8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Part D, Science Base, Section 4: Fats, in 2005 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, pp. 20–22, Washington, D.C. 9. Frankel, E., The lipovore’s challenge to food scientists, INFORM, 18, 470–471, 2007. 10. Erickson, D.R., Soybean oil: Update on number one, JAOCS, 60, 356, 1983. 11. Gupta, M.K., Cottonseed oil for frying: Benefits and challenges, paper presented at 42nd Oilseed Processing Clinic, New Orleans, LA, March 8–9, 1993, p. 19. 12. Haumann, B.F., Mediterranean product consumed worldwide, INFORM, 7, 890–903, 1996. 13. Kimbrell, W. and Maki, D.A., Moving to Mediterranean, Food R&D, 2(2), 1–6, 1995. 14. Knehr, E., Canola … Good for every body, Food Prod. Design Suppl., April, 2006. 15. Anon., P & G test markets a blended Crisco oil, INFORM, 2, 373, 1991. 16. Leo, D.A., Packaging of fats and oils, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, Applewhite, T.H., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1985, pp. 313–315.
Liquid Oils
493
17. Mounts, T.L., Using nitrogen to stabilize soybean oil, INFORM, 4, 1377, 1993. 18. Warner, K. and Mounts, T.L., Flavor and oxidative stability of hydrogenated and unhydrogenated soybean oils, efficacy of plastic packaging, JAOCS, 61, 549, 1984. 19. Weiss, T.J., Household shortenings, in Food Oils and Their Uses, 2nd ed., AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1983, p. 184. 20. Moustafa, A., Salad oil mayonnaise, and salad dressing, in Practical Handbook of Soybean Processing and Utilization, Erickson, D.R., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, and United Soybean Board, St. Louis, MO, 1995, pp. 314–338. 21. Finberg, A.J., Advanced techniques for making mayonnaise and salad dressing, Food Eng., 27(2), 83–91, 1991. 22. 21 CFR 169.115, 21 CFR 169.140, and 21 CFR 169.150, U.S. Standards of Identity, Federal Register, Washington, D.C., April 1, 1990. 23. Weiss, T.J., Mayonnaise and salad dressing, in Food Oils and Their Uses, 2nd ed., AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1983, pp. 211–246. 24. Miller, K.L., High-stability oils, Cereal Foods World, 38, 478–482, 1993.
Chapter 12
Quality Management
12.1 INTRODUCTION Fats and oils processing involves a series of processes in which both physical and chemical changes are made to the raw material. The beginning ingredients — edible vegetable oils and rendered animal fats — are natural products with variable characteristics contributed by nature. Control of these processes requires consideration of the problems associated with (1) properties of the raw materials, (2) large-scale material handling, (3) characteristics of each process or operation, (4) internal and external measurement methods and variability, and (5) identification of customer wants and needs. Control of these processes at satisfactory economic levels requires a quality staff and a system to maintain and improve quality.1 Effective quality control of edible fats and oils at attractive economic levels requires the cooperative activities of all concerned, including technical service, product development, quality assurance, sales, plant operations, and quality control. The basic quality functions for each of these areas include: • Technical service interfaces with customers and product development to identify the product attributes necessary to provide the required functionality before the sale and to lead to resolution of quality complaints after the sale. • Product development responsibilities are twofold: (1) develop products that can be produced consistently and most economically by plant operations to provide the required functionality identified by technical service, and (2) identify new products or processes that are functionally and/or economically superior to competitive products. • Quality assurance is responsible for developing and implementing an integrated sequence of special controls for materials, processes, and products based on the quality aspects of customer requirements, product design, and manufacturing process requirements to ensure timely shipment of products with the proper quality at a minimum cost. • Sales interfaces with the customers on a routine basis and is usually the first to be aware of a new requirement or product deficiency, thus sales has the responsibility for involving the quality support areas necessary to satisfy customer needs. 495
496
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
• Plant operations have the responsibility to produce and deliver products that consistently satisfy customer needs most economically. • Quality control is the manufacturing activity responsible for implementing integrated sequences of assessments of materials, processes, and products based on customer requirements, design specifications, and manufacturing process requirements to ensure timely shipment of quality product at a minimum cost.
Quality management systems are networks of related procedures and practices designed to deliver a quality product to every customer. Quality management begins when customer requirements are determined and continues through product design, sales, manufacturing, product costing, delivery, and service for the customer after the sale. A successful new product introduction followed by continued quality production requires the cooperation of many individuals from all parts of the organization. All of the individual actions must dovetail with each other to produce products that meet or exceed a customer’s requirements. Each process furnishes a supporting function that must be designed to operate in proper relation to the other processes to produce a functional quality product. Carefully planned and tested procedures are a prerequisite for ensuring that the proper actions are performed in the time frame necessary to achieve and maintain customer satisfaction. Operating standards is a descriptive term for the network of procedures required to produce quality products. The operating standards are written instructions for each area to follow to ensure production of a quality product that meets the customer’s wants and needs. 12.2 OPERATING STANDARDS Operating standards should fulfill the first requisite of good-quality management: All operations performed and the quality requirements expected for each operation should be clearly defined and successfully communicated to all levels of management and operating personnel. Control is the main objective of the operating standards, but these standards also serve other purposes as well: (1) a basis for product costing, (2) a continuous record of products and process improvements, (3) a record of changes with specific reasons for the changes, and (4) the basis for product and process audits, among others. Operating standards must cover all of the operational, technical, quality, and special requirements necessary to produce the desired product in the simplest, but most complete, format possible. Organization of the operating standards into three separate sections most successfully meets these criteria: (1) specifications, (2) procedures, and (3) methods. 12.3 SPECIFICATIONS Specifications are integrated sequences of specific controls for materials, processes, and products based on quality aspects of customer requirements, design performance, and manufacturing process capabilities to ensure timely shipment of
Quality Management
497
quality products at the lowest cost. Specifications provide specific guidelines for (1) purchase of raw materials, processing aids, ingredients, and packaging supplies; (2) processing of intermediates; and (3) formulation of the finished product. The finished product then becomes an ingredient or raw material for food processors that develop their own specifications. Thus, specifications define the performance and test requirements that must be demonstrated to confirm functional compliance with a customer’s requirements. Properly designed specifications require logical thinking and program planning to produce simple, explicit, easily understood, complete instructions. The purpose of the specifications is to define what is needed for a large cross section of people who have to buy, supply, receive, process, package, evaluate, store, ship, and use the products. Each specification should define the characteristics of the product to the extent that possession of the document alone is sufficient to identify what is needed. Five different types of specifications are required for a rational system of controls for the complex processing of edible fats and oils into functional ingredients for prepared foods: ingredient, package, product, customer instructions, and summary specifications. 12.3.1 Specifications Format Each specification should be identified with the name of the company issuing the specification, the date, and the common or usual name of the ingredient, package, or product. Most concerns have also adopted a specification numbering system to better identify individual products for the user personnel and computer systems utilized. This and the other useful information, common to all specifications, should be presented utilizing a uniform format. Uniform presentation is best controlled by the adoption of a form that can be adapted for all of the specification types. Presentation of this information should appear to be professionally designed to help convey its importance and official status to internal and external users of the documents. Figure 12.1 presents an efficient specification form that can effectively serve purchase and product specifications as well as other types beneficial to the quality management effort. This form has three sections, two of which require information common to all specifications. The other section is the body of the specification, where the definitions, formulations, quality requirements, and other characteristics that change with the product are presented in a logical sequence for each specification type. The content of the common sections is outlined below with reference to the blocks within each section indicated in Figure 12.1: (A) Product description: The product description defines the product with the common or usual name of the ingredient, internal product description, or package description. An indication of use of the material can also be included in this descriptive block, as well as other information that could help identify the product. (B) Numerical identification: The specification number is a permanent number for the identified product. Each time a product change of any magnitude is made, a new issue number must be assigned, but the specification number remains constant.
498
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
COMPANY NAME AND LOGO PRODUCT, MATERIAL OR OPERATION (A)
DISTRIBUTION
(E)
SPECIFICATION EFFECTIVE DATE
SPEC NUMBER
(C)
(B)
SUPERSEDES: (D)
ISSUE
SPEC NO
DATE
ISSUE NUMBER (B)
REASON FOR CHANGE (F) ORIGINATOR CUSTODIAN
(G)
DATE (H)
(I)
DATE (J)
Figure 12.1 Universal specification format.
The identity relationship between the product and the specification number cannot be changed unless the product is eliminated, then, after one year of inactivity, the specification number can be reactivated for another product. Even at this point, however, the next issue number for this specification should be assigned when it is reassigned. This time factor should allow all of the systems to be purged of this specification number and product relationship during this time period. (C) Effective date: The effective date indicates to the operations and cost departments when this specification replaces any previous issues or the first date that it can be produced. (D) Superseded information: The superseded specification number, issue number, and effective date document the time of manufacture of the previous product for information purposes, which might be needed to solve a production problem or customer complaint.
Quality Management
499
(E) Distribution: This block identifies the copy distribution as determined for each individual specification. Distribution should be identified by job functions at specific locations, rather than using personal names, to ensure that all the necessary functions and locations are covered without interruption. A letter and number code for the distribution list saves space on the specification sheet; for example, Letters indicate the location: G = General office S = A plant location J = Another plant location Numbers indicate the job function: 1 = Plant manager 2 = Plant quality control manager 3 = Plant quality control laboratory 4 = Plant processing manager 10 = Operations vice president 11 = Cost accounting manager 12 = Quality assurance manager 14 = Research and development (R&D) vice president (F) Reason for change: The reason for change requirement helps alert users to specific changes and the reason for each change. This section lists all the changes in one place for the user, rather than requiring them to study the entire document to identify them. A further aid to identifying changes for personnel utilizing the specification is a “c” indicator in the right-hand margin in line with the actual change. (G) Originator: The signature of the originator, usually the author, indicates that the printed specification meets the requirements of the customer or product functionality. (H) Originator date: This block is completed by the originator to show when the document was signed. (I) Custodian: It is essential that only one custodian authorize all specifications or at least all of a single type of specification to minimize the risk that specifications published by multiple custodians could be different, causing confusion to the users. The custodian’s signature also confirms that the requirements have been evaluated to confirm that operations should be able to comply with them. (J) Custodian date: The custodian dates his or her signature to show when the document was signed.
12.3.2 Ingredient Specifications Ingredient specifications are exacting standards required of the ingredients, including all quality characteristics, composition, legal, and other requirements that might affect the end use of the product. Active and prospective suppliers are provided copies of the purchase specifications and all revisions. These specifications are the basis for communication between the supplier and the fats and oils processors and fulfill several requirements for both parties: • Provide a description of the user’s needs • Serve as a basis for the ingredient costs
500
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
• Serve as a legal and technical basis for the purchase contract • Document the user’s standard for ingredient acceptability
The ingredient specification must be a composite of the user’s needs and the supplier’s ability to produce. It should define the ingredient in performance terms rather than how it should be produced. Ingredient manufacturers have more knowledge and experience making their product than does the user, therefore, the ingredient user should describe the requirements and let the manufacturer determine the best procedure to meet them. Proper preparation of ingredient-purchasing specifications requires consideration of several general factors regarding the manner in which to describe the product requirements. First, the objectives that the ingredient is expected to fulfill must be determined followed by the parameters that best describe them. The parameters must be controllable and measurable; it is self-defeating to specify factors that cannot be measured or controlled. Whenever possible, the test methods should be standard procedures accepted by the industry producing the ingredient; however, special evaluations or improved procedures that provide more accurate or timely results than the standard procedures should also be included. The allowable variation for each specific limit must be determined, recognizing that variation exists for almost all analytical and performance evaluations. Ingredientspecification authors tend to allow only minimal tolerances; however, unnecessarily tight specification limits are usually self-defeating. A tight limit has no merit if it only reduces the ingredient availability or increases the cost. The allowed tolerances should be as wide as possible to perform satisfactorily, but they should not be so broad that the specification is ineffective. The relative importance of the different parameters must be identified. Some are more critical to the acceptability of the ingredient and require a narrower range of acceptability. Others may be of only minor importance and do not require as much attention. One method of conveying the importance of the requirements is to separate them into categories of critical, major, and minor. The ingredient supplier should have the latitude to use the best procedure to produce the product; however, the complete composition must be known and specified. In most cases, the ingredient becomes a part of the user’s finished product requiring labeling, identification of potential hazards, or some other regulatory requirement. All ingredient specifications should be as complete as possible. Although references to other sources of more detailed information, such as analytical methods, government of industry standards, and religious requirements may be necessary, every ingredient specification should be as complete as possible to avoid the need to refer to other information sources for understanding.2 Numerous resources are available for preparing the ingredient specification. Most times, the best source for ingredient information is the manufacturers, who usually have detailed product profiles of their products. These usually include product specifications or typical analyses, which may or may not be acceptable as a complete ingredient-purchase specification. Other resources include the Food Chemical Codex and the Code of Federal Regulations. The Codex lists specifications for many
Quality Management
501
food additives, and the Code of Federal Regulations is the source of the Standards of Identity for many foods and the standards for grades of many agricultural materials. Also, many trade organizations have developed standards for their products, and numerous technical societies have developed standard analytical methods for use with their product types (e.g., American Oil Chemists’ Society, American Association of Cereal Chemists, and Association of Analytical Chemists). These methods are an important part of the ingredient specification. Additionally, reference books and publications on food products should not be overlooked as resources. Another valuable information source for preparing similar new ingredient specifications is the specifications already in existence.3 12.3.2.1 Ingredient Specifications Format A uniform format can be followed for all of the ingredient specifications using the form illustrated in Figure 12.1. The body section for all ingredient specifications should provide the following information:3
1. Regulatory statement: The first item on the specification sheet should be a general statement requiring compliance with current regulations of the appropriate governing agencies. 2. Definition: The definition is a description of the ingredient defining the product, physical form, and composition. It is desirable to specify that the ingredient must meet the requirements of a specific standard, such as a particular U.S. grade, or a standard from the Food Chemicals Codex, vegetable or animal origin, natural or artificial, any religious authorization requirements, etc. In many cases, the processing may be important, for example, whether it should be hydrated, pasteurized, dried, or treated in some specific manner. Some materials may be designated by function, for example, an additive may be specified as an antifoamer, antioxidant, flavor, colorant, enrichment, etc. 3. Formula: If the ingredient is to be prepared by a specific quantitative formula, this should be outlined on the specification. This should be done only if the ingredient performance depends on a specific composition or preparation procedure. 4. Chemical and physical evaluations: This section is the heart of the ingredient specification. Chemical requirements include such parameters as moisture, acidity, heavy metals, pesticide residue, preservatives, emulsifier level, etc. Physical characteristics include color, flavor, melting point, viscosity, stability, foreign material, and performance requirements. The evaluation methods should always be specified with the expected results and allowed tolerances. 5. Microbiological testing: All ingredients susceptible to the growth of harmful organisms should require certification of acceptable microbiological test results to ensure the receipt of safe, legal, uniform products. 6. Manufacturing conditions: This section should include necessary procedures that are more unusual than those that are standard methods of operation. These may be important because, in many cases, the procedures are related to attributes that are difficult to measure on receipt of the ingredient. 7. Packaging: Generally, as a minimum the ingredient specification should include the type of container in which the product is packed, the net weight, and the
502
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
identification information. The identification should include the name of the product, the producer, and the lot number for packaging date identification, at the very least. Many other details may be included in the packaging section, such as: a. Composition of the packaging material, strength, weight, thickness, etc. b. Unitizing, number per pallet, stretch wrapping, etc. c. Permitted usage of glass, straps, clips, staples, wires, etc. d. Specifications for bulk container sizes, sealing requirements for protection, cleanliness, etc. 8. Handling and shipping: Any special handling or shipping requirements should be identified on the ingredient specification, or a referral should be made to another reference specification if they are lengthy and the requirements apply to many different products. These special instructions could include fumigation requirements; protection from heat, cold, or freezing; or the need for a certain arrival temperature. 9. Approved suppliers: This section should be completed and updated when a new supplier is approved or an old supplier is deleted for one reason or another. This listing keeps operations informed of the approved suppliers to contact in the case of a serious problem when purchasing and quality assurance personnel are unavailable. Normally, this section is deleted before the specification is given to new prospective suppliers.
12.3.3 Packaging Specifications Packaging requirements must be considered as carefully and as thoroughly as any other component of the finished product. Packaging selection is predicated on custom, product protection, end-use application, economics, and customer requirements. The packaging of edible fats and oils materially affects the quality and cost of the finished products. In fact, packaging materials and the attendant labor expense represent the second most significant portion of product cost, after raw materials. Quality-wise, product that has been meticulously processed to obtain optimum performance can be protected or lost by the selection of the packaging material.4 The packaging specification, like ingredient specifications, must be a composite of the user’s needs and the supplier’s ability to produce the product. The specification should define the package in composition and performance terms, rather than describing how it should be fabricated. The package supplier should be allowed to determine the best procedure to meet the packaging requirements. Preparation of packaging specifications requires the consideration of several general factors regarding the product package: • Expectations for the packaging material. • Parameters that best describe the packaging and which are controllable and measurable. • Allowable package variation that will perform satisfactorily on the designated packaging equipment • Coordination of the packaging components to produce a complete package. Many of the product packages for edible fats and oils require more than one component
Quality Management
503
to fit together. For example, the packaging bill of materials for a soft margarine could include: (1) a plastic tub, (2) a plastic lid, (3) a printed fiberboard sleeve, (4) a printed shipping case, and (5) fiberboard case pads. All these components must fit together snugly for product protection, but also easily for high-speed packaging. These requirements require consideration of the allowed specification tolerances for all the components to ensure trouble-free performance. • Satisfaction of the applicable regulatory agency requirements for net weight, product protection, food-grade materials, and construction utilization, plus any other regulations that may apply.
The functional design of a package can be formulated internally, by an outside designer, or by the supplier. Final decisions regarding the container must consider the anticipated environmental conditions to which the container will be subjected under both normal and extreme conditions. The packaging specifications should rely upon the designers and the identified or expected customer requirements for determination of the critical, major, and minor requirements. 12.3.3.1 Packaging Specifications Format Uniformity of presentation is as important for packaging specifications as any of the other specification types. The form illustrated in Figure 12.1 can be easily adapted for packaging, with the main section identifying all the requirements for each package component. The package specifications should be presented in a uniform format for clarity and for rapid location of the individual requirements. The suggested contents for the information section of a packaging specification include:
1. Regulatory statement: Like the ingredient specifications, those for packaging are purchase specifications that should always include a general statement requiring compliance with current regulations of the appropriate governing agencies. 2. Definition: A description of the package component, defining the container part, form, construction, materials used, fittings, intended use, style, and any other pertinent information to better define the packaging, is required. It is desirable to specify that the container meet the requirements of any existing container standards, regulations, or recognized descriptor terms. 3. Composition: Many different materials are used to package edible fats and oils finished products. The traditional containers are constructed of metal, glass, plastic, corrugated, and fiber-wound composite materials with many different coatings, liners, finishes, tints, and other protective products. 4. Size: Information about the size of the container can include capacity, dimensions, volume, thickness, and any other measurements that specifically identify the container. The allowed tolerances for these measurements must be identified. 5. Coatings: Coatings might be applied to an exterior or interior surface to reduce friction, to protect the product, or to complete the package. 6. Tare weight: The weight of the container should be as uniform as possible for weight control and for determining the gross weight of the finished product for transportation information.
504
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
7. Quality standards: Application testing of packaging materials can include confirmations of the composition, container size, protective coatings, tare weights, or other evaluations, such as compression testing, bursting strength, resistance to temperature changes or abuse, stress tests, plus any specific testing for a particular attribute. All test requirements should be identified with the allowed tolerances and communicated to the suppliers through copies of the current specifications. 8. Printing requirements: Many containers are preprinted with all or a portion of the label of the product. Current governmental regulations for the label of a specific product must be transmitted to the supplier for compliance. Any changes in the product or the label requirements should initiate a change in the specification to update these instructions. 9. Handling and shipping: This section gives the supplier information regarding the desired packaging of the packaging materials. For example, instructions for pallets of empty salad oil bottles might be as follows: The cases of empty bottles are to be shipped with the cases right side up except for the top layer of cases on the pallets. The cases on the top pallet layer are to be inverted with the top case flaps folded in a normal closure position, but not glued. The pallet load is to be either strapped or string tied. 10. Approved suppliers: This section should be completed and updated when a new supplier is approved or an old supplier is deleted for any reason. This listing keeps operations informed of the approved suppliers to contact in the case of a serious problem when purchasing and quality assurance personnel are unavailable. Normally, this section is deleted before the specification is given to new prospective suppliers.
12.3.4 Product Specifications These standards provide the criteria for judging the suitability of a product for its intended use. Product specifications are detailed descriptions of the composition, process conditions, and quality requirements, and they provide special instructions for each product. The preferred product specifications for fats and oils treat the product from each process as a finished product and are designated here as the process control system. The purpose of the process control system is to identify product defects where and when they occur, so corrective action can be taken immediately at the point in the process when changes can be made most effectively with a minimum of reprocessing, lost time, and product. A requirement of the process control system is that each product must satisfy all the specified limits before transferring to the next process. The control points established for each process must be preventive, must involve all functions, and must be practical to be understandable and enforceable. Quality must be created during product design, identified by specification, and built into the product during production. A quality product can be produced only when process capabilities and product tolerances are compatible with each other and with the product functional requirements. Coordinated quality programs provide product production data to the quality assurance and product development groups so the product design is consistent with current production capabilities. The formulation of each product will vary, depending on the product performance requirements; not only is the composition dictated by the desired performance, but
Quality Management
505
also the allowed tolerances of the components. Normally, fats and oils products are composed of two or more basestocks blended together to meet the finished product requirements. The allowed tolerances for the various components are critical to the degree of acceptability. Many times, the analytical characteristics of fats and oils products can be met by several different compositions; however, only the product complying with the design composition will perform properly. Therefore, it is important to carefully review the components and the tolerances specified to determine that the specification does not allow a substandard product. The evaluations that occur during processing of the product must be carefully considered to achieve the best product and process control. Adequate control of each product at each stage of processing must be determined by the specification originator and confirmed by the custodian. The considerations required for adequate control are identified in the following checklist:
1. Characteristics to measure: Identify the attributes that separate this product from others. 2. Measurement methods, equipment, or instrumentation: Determine the analytical and performance evaluations that measure the product attributes reliably and in a timely manner. All evaluations must be completed in time for necessary corrective action to be taken in case of adverse findings. 3. Performance standards required: Variability is assured in every process from two sources: (1) inherent process variability and (2) test method and equipment variability. Therefore, the prerequisites for realistic product specifications preparations are: a. Consideration of the accuracy of the test methods employed; the product tolerances specified can be no better than the established variation for the measurement results. b. Determination of the tolerances required by the process equipment to be utilized; products that require tighter tolerances than the capacity of the process cannot be produced routinely. Delivering products within the tighter limits would require a sorting process with a predictable failure rate. An alternative consideration would be to upgrade the process or equipment to produce the desired quality product with maintenance, training, better control, new equipment, or a process change. 4. Control points: Control measurement should be exercised at several points during each process; usually evaluations are conducted during processing to determine that the process is in control, and analysis of the finished product for each process confirms that it has remained in control.
12.3.4.1 Product Specifications Format The form illustrated in Figure 12.1 is also applicable to product specifications, with the body section identifying all the requirements for each individual product and process. The product requirements should follow a uniform presentation in the identification section for clarity and to facilitate quick location of individual requirements. The contents of the information section for a product specification are reviewed, in order of presentation, below:
506
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
1. Formula: This section specifies the components of the product both by common name and specification number, as well as the target percentage and allowed tolerances. 2. Processing: The process is identified and all specific conditions are specified that are required to produce the desired product. For example, a hydrogenation process specification would identify the conditions for pressure, temperature, and catalyst type and concentration. 3. Additives: Many products benefit from fat and nonfat additives. In most cases, the addition levels are minute, but the performance differences are substantial. Additive examples are antioxidants, antifoamers, colorants, emulsifiers, flavors, antisticking agents, crystal inhibitors, and chelating agents. 4. Quality standards: The physical, analytical, and performance requirements are listed in this section, which also indicates the required control point for each evaluation and specifies the target result with the allowed tolerance. It is not necessary to perform all of the analyses at each process control point, as can be indicated with an “X” to denote that the evaluation need not be performed at this point. 5. Special instructions: Some products require slightly different handling, or the customer may have some specific requirements that must be satisfied to adequately meet their needs. These instructions should be presented in this section, or a directive should indicate the location of more detailed instructions. 6. Notes: This section is reserved for notes to explain in more detail any entry in the specification. These notes might clarify the addition point or sequence for an additive, show that two additives should be mixed together, indicate a potential problem, advise an allowed substitution, or generally provide more detail when needed.
12.3.5 Customer Instruction Specifications Edible fats and oils are ingredients for the preparation of other food products, whether the consumer is a large food processor, a restaurant, or a homemaker. Many customers have specific requirements for code dating, reporting of analytical characteristics, preshipment samples, packaging instructions, delivery temperatures, etc., that are different from standard practice. These instructions, in most cases, are customer specific and too lengthy to incorporate into the product specification or list on each individual order and too important to rely on general correspondence to convey the requirements. Creation of a separate specification type for these instructions helps to convey their importance and provides a perpetual reference tool that can be easily updated when the customer requirements change. 12.3.5.1 Customer Instruction Specifications Format The specification form illustrated in Figure 12.1 is adaptable to customer instructions with some revisions in the information section and, of course, the body or informational section. Numerical identification of the customer instruction specification should be replaced with the customer’s name, and the specific requirements are listed in the body or informational section. The requirements must be presented in a
Quality Management
507
COMPANY NAME AND LOGO
CUSTOMER INSTRUCTIONS SPECIFICATION
PRODUCT, MATERIAL OR OPERATION
EFFECTIVE DATE
Shamrock Baking Company
SPEC NUMBER
April 1, 2008
General Offices: Clover, Texas
SUPERSEDES:
Shortenings
CUSTOMER:
ISSUE 1
Shamrock CI
DATE 1/1/07
ISSUE NUMBER
Shamrock Baking Co.
2
Certificate of Analysis Requirements:
A certificate of analysis showing the Shamrock product name, code number and date of shipment, and all analysis indicated with an (S) on the individual Product Specification must accompany each shipment. The COA should be addressed to the Quality Control Manager at the receiving plant. Shamrock Product Identification: Spec No 8003
Shamrock Name Shamrock Cake & Icing
Shamrock Code 1102-3
8039 8040
Shamrock Icing Shamrock All-Purpose
1304-6 1001-2
8099 8341
Shamrock Filling Shortening Shamrock Salad Oil
1605-1 1050-4
-c-
Package Identification Requirements:
All package products must have the Shamrock code number stenciled on each package on two (2) sides, in 3-inch letters
Shamrock Package Shipment Requirements:
No staples, nails, wire ties, or similar devices should be used as external closures Three (3) code dates maximum per product All palletized products must be stretch wrapped
DISTRIBUTION: G: 10-11-12-21-25
REASON FOR CHANGE:
Addition of Shamrock Filling Shortening Code 1605-1
S: 1-2-3-4-19-32-40 B: 1-2-3-4-19-32-40-43
ORIGINATOR:
O K Sample
DATE
May 29, 2008 CUSTODIAN
Q A Wright
DATE
May 30, 2008
Figure 12.2 Customer instructions specification format.
508
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
logical manner, as predetermined contents for all customers would be awkward and lengthy. Figure 12.2 presents a hypothetical customer instruction specification. 12.3.6 Summary Specifications Summary specifications are useful tools for several different purposes, but they basically serve two functions, either to combine specific information from many individual specifications or to provide supplemental information for individual specifications. A listing of the potential summary specification titles probably describes the objectives of this type of specification better than a lengthy discussion. Some selected typical summary specification titles include: • • • • • • • •
Summary of basestock limits and controls Shortening plasticization conditions Margarine manufacturing conditions Flaking conditions Packaged product tempering and storage requirements Label instructions for stenciled packages Packaged product target weights Product ingredient statements
The summary specifications are timesaving devices for operations and provide useful composite information for other users, such as process and product development, cost accounting, transportation, and sales. In many cases, these specifications provide all the information necessary, eliminating the need for a complete set of specifications for every user. These specifications also provide convenient comparisons of products. Sometimes, development of similar products can result in radically different requirements. The summary specifications help identify such occurrences before the newly developed product specification is issued. Constant monitoring of the summary specifications is required to keep the information current. Every new or revised product specification may also require a change in one or more of these specifications; however, a change in regulations or another attribute that affects most of the product specifications might be handled by a change in the summary specification, rather than by changing all of the individual specifications. 12.3.6.1 Summary Specifications Format The format utilized for these composite specifications would follow the same guidelines as the customer instruction specifications. It would be more practical, however, to use specification numbers rather than the names of the summaries only; otherwise, the customer instruction specifications shown in Figure 12.2 should serve as an example for the summary specifications. As with customer instructions, no set style for the information section is practical. The summarized information should be presented in a logical format, varied for each individual specification as the information dictates.
Quality Management
509
12.4 PROCEDURES Every company applies its own particular personality and individuality to its approach to business. Policy, determined by top management, establishes the broad principles that guide a company’s actions. The various departments within the company must develop plans and specific procedures for execution of the policy as it affects their areas of responsibility. Thus, the quality assurance department must tailor its procedures to fit the company policy or mission statement. Many persons in all parts of the organization must make decisions and take actions that directly affect product quality. All of these individual actions must dovetail with each other as to purpose and timing to meet the company’s quality goals. Such dovetailing is accomplished by following carefully planned procedures. The purpose of the procedures is to guide the actions of the company as related to quality management activities. The quality program must fit the current policy yet be flexible, should have provisions for recognizing when a change is needed, and should execute such changes on a timely basis. Quality procedures must have provisions for revisions caused by changes in the system, obsolescence, and knowledge gained by use and experience that may be incorporated into the individual procedures. The individual procedures should be reviewed annually, if warranted, to ensure the success of the program. Initiation of a system does not automatically guarantee compliance to the procedures, therefore, periodic audits of the procedures should be conducted to determine: (1) if the procedure is functioning as it was designed and (2) if the procedure is still conceptually adequate. Procedures establish the method of execution of a function, operation, or a process to meet the identified objectives. Quality assurance has the responsibility of ensuring that the quality objectives and goals have been clearly and adequately defined for the entire organization, with special emphasis on product performance, protection, and legality. 12.4.1 Procedures Format A uniform format should be utilized for procedures that can be easily distinguished from the specification format. Procedures should be identified with the company name, procedure title, effective date, issue number, and page number. If the procedure is part of the company’s administrative procedure system, it may also have a procedure number assigned. Normally, procedures are not individually signed, but are distributed with a signed cover letter that also identifies the copy list of the procedure. The procedure format is usually in outline form and has the components outlined on the specimen form shown in Figure 12.3. 12.4.2 Quality Procedures Most firms in the edible fats and oils industry will require many of the same types of procedures, depending on the products produced. Those engaged in packaging
510
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
COMPANY NAME AND LOGO POLICY AND PROCEDURES
TITLE PROCEDURE NO. ISSUE DATE
PAGE OF REVISION NO.
PURPOSE: Defines the objective of the procedure and a short explanation of the reason it is needed
Scope:
Describes the guidelines pertaining to the procedure
Procedure: Step by step guidelines for the actions required and the responsibility area, function, or personnel for each Forms:
An explanation of any form developed to assist in performing the procedure
Reports:
The documentation necessary for the procedure, if any, with the required distribution
Figure 12.3 Specimen policy and procedures format.
products will require a more extensive system of quality procedures than those shipping bulk-tank products only. Eight quality procedures for fats and oils are briefly described in the following paragraphs with the objectives, reason required, and the process. 12.4.2.1 Complaint Handling Procedure In spite of functional quality control systems, fats and oils processors can still experience product complaints. Each quality complaint may involve some of or all the six basic steps to resolve the problem to the customer’s satisfaction while learning how to prevent a reoccurrence in the future:
1. Replacement of product: Problems with fats and oils products may interrupt a customer’s production or cause the product produced to be off-quality. Shipment of a good-quality product as soon as possible to replace the questionable product should be the first consideration. 2. Financial adjustment: Unless the problem is found to be customer generated, reimbursement for complaint-generated costs should be the second essential step toward reestablishing customer relations. 3. Restoration of customer goodwill: A product failure is an annoyance at best, and the irritation can easily grow out of bounds without proper follow-up. Most customers are most anxious to know what preventive measures have been taken to ensure that their current problem will not be repeated shortly. 4. Evaluation of complaint product: The actual complaint product should be analyzed and the production records reviewed to identify the source of the problem.
Quality Management
511
5. Prevention of a recurrence: Corrective actions identified from the complaint evaluations should be instituted on a priority basis. In many cases, the underlying cause is broad enough to affect other products or customers, and measures must be taken to avoid a spread of the problem. 6. Document the complaint and resolution: A written report has several benefits: closure for the complaint, source of information for resolving future problems, back-up detail for potential process improvements, and information for all involved parties of the problem identification and resolution.
The organization machinery required to process complaints should be no more elaborate than the complaint load justifies. However, the lack of a formal complaint procedure can easily result in excessive attention being required to resolve a complaint and the loss of customers from slow or poor handling of their complaints. It must be remembered that each individual customer complaint must be taken seriously, and corrective actions must be implemented promptly to restore customer satisfaction. A complaint form specifically designed for the user company and products can help simplify and speed up the complaint-handling process. The form must be simple, explicit, and easily understood and must contain complete instructions for filling it out. The form should be a checklist of all the basic information necessary to bring about a speedy resolution of the problem. Figure 12.4 is a complaint form that requires information considered necessary for a bulk-tank shipment or packaged shortening, margarine, or oil complaint. Complaints are an indicator of the effectiveness of a quality control program and specifically identify problem areas. A continuing analysis of complaints will indicate the effectiveness of the problem-solving process implemented to identify corrective actions. The complaint analysis should track quality complaints by problem categories and report follow-up conclusions to management and personnel involved. 12.4.2.2 Product Recall Procedure It is inevitable that, occasionally, defective products will be produced. Further, it is possible that a defect could be of such a magnitude or seriousness that it constitutes a health hazard, with the attendant risk of injury resulting in legal liability for the processor. Other, less serious product defects also represent very real, legal, regulatory, or financial risks to the processor. Should defective product leave the control of the producer, it is essential that a procedure exists to identify, retrieve, and dispose of the defective product before (1) consumers are exposed to any hazards; (2) federal, state, or local regulations are violated; or (3) any legal financial or regulatory penalties are levied. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Enforcement Policy has defined recall as “a firm’s removal or correction of a marketed product that the Food and Drug Administration considers to be in violation of the laws it administers and against which the agency would initiate legal action (e.g., seizure).” Recall does not include a market withdrawal or a stock recovery. The FDA assigns class designations to recalls to indicate the relative degree of health hazard for each product as follows:
512
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
QUALITY COMPLAINT EVALUATION
COMPANY NAME AND LOGO
Complaint No. Date Entered
CUSTOMER INFORMATION: Customer Address City & State Telephone
PERSONNEL INVOLVED: Sales Tech Service QA Manager QC Manager
Contact Person
Others
PRODUCT INFORMATION: Specification Plant Ship Date Tank Car No. Truck No.
Product No. Order No. Customer PO No. Arrival Date Quantity
Label Package Code Date Time Case No.
COMPLAINT DESCRIPTION:
COMPLAINT EVALUATION:
CORRECTIVE ACTION:
COMPLAINT CLOSURE:
DISTRIBUTION:
Date Completed QC Manager QA Manager Figure 12.4 Quality complaint evaluation form.
Quality Management
513
“Class I is a situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of, or exposure to, a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.” “Class II is a situation in which use of, or exposure to, a violative product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences or where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote.” “Class III is a situation in which use of, or exposure to, a violative product is not likely to cause adverse health consequences.”
Products recovered but not designated as recalls, may be identified by two additional terms: Market withdrawal is the removal or correction of a distributed product, which involves a minor violation or no violation subject to legal action by the FDA. The withdrawal reason could be normal stock rotation, adjustments, repairs, etc. Stock recovery is the removal or correction of a product that has never left the producer’s direct control. The product must be located on premises owned or under control of the producer, and no portion of the lot should have been released for sale or use.
Recalls can usually be divided into four phases:
1. Defect discovery: The product defect is identified, significance determined, and problem extent ascertained. The FDA is notified when the product defect has been found to meet the recall criteria. 2. Recall defective products: Identify the product lot involved and the location of all potentially defective products. Notify all locations to place the product “on hold” pending instructions for further disposition. 3. Disposition: Determine the handling required for the defective product, such as destruction, rework, or other. 4. Termination of recall action: A recall is terminated when the FDA agrees that all reasonable efforts have been made to remove or correct the problem.
The recall procedure implemented should be tested periodically for effectiveness. The primary concern for defective products resulting from an internal problem is the ability of the system to reconcile production records with inventory and quantities shipped to identified locations for a particular lot number. Defects arising out of an external recall of a product utilized as an ingredient, processing aid, or packaging material are more demanding. Each shipment of these materials must have a lot number identification and records maintained to trace usage in the particular lots of finished products. 12.4.2.3 Product Identification Procedures The manner and depth of product identification vary within the edible fats and oils industry; nevertheless, the importance of adequate identification cannot be overemphasized. The main reasons for and benefits derived from good product identification include:
514
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
• Traceability: Tracking of all the components and processing of the individual products with the identity of the ingredients, processing aids, and packaging materials preserved; traceability is a vital element of an acceptable recall program. • Complaint evaluation: Exact product identification for both packaging date and specification recognition is mandatory for evaluation of a product complaint to determine the cause and corrective action to prevent future problems. • Stock rotation: The code date or packaging date is a useful tool for practicing firstin/first-out in warehousing. • Shelf-life control: Edible fats and oils products are perishable, due to changes in flavor, consistency, appearance, and so on. Code dating provides a means for controlling the age of product shipped and pick-up control from the customer. • Product audits: Product identification is necessary for product audits evaluating product movement and quality. The code date information identifies the age of the product and, coupled with the specification identification, should enable the auditor to retrieve the original processing data for a more complete picture of the product attributes and changes caused by age and distribution. • Inventory control: Product identification codes and code dates are routinely utilized for inventory systems for production control and the financial area.
Many approaches to product identification can be taken. In some cases, customers specify the product identification coding to be used on the packaged product; some systems require a decoder to identify any information, whereas others use completely recognizable information. The depth of some identification is very detailed on some, whereas others have only the bare minimum. In any case, for the reasons listed and for processor protection, a complete product identification system should be developed and utilized for every product, for those shipped both in packages and in bulk. Most processors of edible oils utilize a batch number system for product traceability. The major raw materials (crude edible fats and oils) are procured in lots that are assigned an identifiable batch number. The batch-number identification system can be utilized throughout all of processing, including the shipment of bulk products. Traceability maintenance requires documentation of the batch numbers and transmission to the next process tier of documentation. In this system, a batch number is maintained until a change in the product has been made by blending or processing. Every individual packaged product produced, as well as any outer shipping cases, should be marked with a code date to identify the date packed and other identifying codes to identify the product. This information should be applied to each container, as permanently as possible, in a location or on a part that should not become separated from the actual product in normal use. Several types of code dates can and are utilized for food products, including: • Open code dates depict the packaging date, sell-by date, or use-by date; they identify a day, month, and year and are utilized for many retail products. • Closed code dates utilize a system of letters and numerals that are not immediately recognized as a date. Typically these systems utilize the Julian day of the year in some combination with the last numeral of the year and a letter designation for the producing plant; however, some processors utilize systems requiring a decoding sheet or device to identify the code date.
Quality Management
515
• Individual packaging time and case sequential coding is also practiced by some processors for improved traceability. This information allows the processor to identify the beginning, end, middle, or some other point during packaging plus any interruptions that may have occurred.
Product information codes are usually imprinted on the packages in the same location or general area as code dates. This information may be referred to as a product code, which is usually the same as the universal product code (UPC) bar code. The product code will typically identify the product label, package size, and specification number. Some concerns will also print the product specification number on each package for additional identification. Product liability in case of a problem is minimized with each improvement in traceability. The more extensive systems providing case sequential coding and packaging time, as well as crosschecking information for product identity, are valuable assets for pinpointing problem areas and sources. These aids can help salvage the majority of a packaged product batch instead of losing the entire batch if such coding were not available. 12.4.2.4 Specification Change Requisition Specifications should represent the best and latest known methods and procedures for each operation. This means that the specifications must be flexible and open to change when an improvement has been identified. Therefore, effective specifications are continually updated and revised to reflect changes due to quality improvements, manufacturing changes, technology advances, cost reductions, formula revisions, package design modifications, government regulations, and (probably the foremost reason) customer requests. Progress and change are usually partners; however, change does not always result in progress. Therefore, a definite process for changing a specification with appropriate checks and balances is necessary to avoid useless or unwarranted revisions. Anyone using the specification system should be entitled to request a specification change. Quality assurance, as the custodian for the specification system, is the logical clearinghouse for these requests. Input should be solicited from any area that could be affected by the revision to help determine if the change should be approved. Some of the logical questions that each area should review for each request include: • • • • • • • • •
Are the requested revisions realistic? Will a change in the process or equipment be required for this revision? Are the specified limits realistic? Will this change affect the functionality of the product? Will the change introduce any special handling requirements? Does the revision reflect the customer’s specification or product requirements? Will the customer agree to the proposed change? How will product or delivery costs be affected? Does the request require more extensive study or development before passing judgment?
516
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
A specification change requisition form, designed around the information needed to determine the feasibility of the fats and oils product revision, can help simplify and speed up the approval process. The form must be simple, explicit, and self-explanatory for completion and handling. Figure 12.5 illustrates a specification change requisition form designed to fulfill these requirements.
SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUISITION
COMPANY NAME AND LOGO
ORIGINATED BY:
Spec. No. Issue Date Request Date
RECOMMENDED BY:
CHANGE OR ADDITION REQUESTED:
REASON FOR CHANGE:
SUBMITTED FOR
AGREEMENT
CONSIDERATION TO:
Yes
REASON FOR DISAPPROVAL: No
Operations Product Development Technical Service Sales Other QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTION Approved Disapproved QA Custodian
QA Director
COMMENTS:
Figure12.5 Specification change request form.
Reason:
Quality Management
517
12.4.2.5 New Product Approval Procedure Operations produces products according to the guidelines provided by product development with assistance from quality assurance. Specifications are the guidelines that define the materials, processes, sampling plan, quantitative and qualitative measurements, and acceptance or rejection criteria for each product. Quality assurance has the responsibility for preparing the specifications with direction from product development, marketing, and technical service, followed by approval from operations that the guidelines are reasonable and achievable. When the specifications are written and approved, operations has a description of the quality constraints within which it must work, and a product profile has emerged for marketing. It is at the new-product conception stage that maximum flexibility exists for using creative ingenuity and technical talents to design quality products that can be produced as error free as possible. Quality and safety are best built into a product during the development stages where, previously, performance has been the major concern for many products. Thus, quality assurance should be involved early in the development stage to identify the potential product constraints and help design systems to avoid them. Some of the potential quality and safety constrains for edible fats and oils products include: Product protection: Sanitation and health-hazard control Quality control: Product measurement and tolerances Legal: Federal, state, and local regulations Economic: Product worth vs. cost to produce Raw material: Quality, type, and availability of crude edible fats and oils Customer needs and demands: In addition to performance other requirements, such as delivery temperature, packaging, product limits, or quantities (could be major constraints) • Labeling: Conforming to certain nutritional requirements or meeting other limitations • Other influences: Any other limitations that may arise
• • • • • •
A new-product approval procedure should have definite requirements to ensure that the product performs as expected and can be effectively produced by operations. A three-hurdle procedure to determine if product development can pass the new-product production responsibilities to operations involves the following requirements:
1. Experimental specification: A product specification with complete composition, processing, quality standards, and all other pertinent requirements, but limited to a one-batch plant test and the complete responsibility of product development. The actual production must be supervised by product development personnel, and disposition arranged with sales and marketing for a successful product or with operations for substandard product rework or disposal. 2. Probational specification: After a successful plant experimental production and customer approval, the product enters the probational period. Operations produce
518
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
the product, but product development retains responsibility and is on call for any problems that may be encountered. 3. Successful production: After successful production of 5 to 10 batches of the probationary product, the specification is finalized and becomes the full responsibility of operations.
The three-step procedure to obtain an approved product specification provides product development with an opportunity to plant test a laboratory-developed or pilot plant-developed product and to demonstrate that it performs as designed. It also provides plant-scale data for evaluation of the quality standards and tolerance levels. 12.4.2.6 Weight Control Program The purpose of a weight control program is to ensure that the average fill weight for each packaged product is as close to the declared net weight as possible. From a practical standpoint, it should be recognized that, because of variations in product and filling equipment, it is impossible for all packages to weigh an exact specified amount. Overweights are expensive for the producer, but underweights are unfair to the customer, thus most weight control programs are designed to prevent the shipment of unreasonably short or overweight packages and to conform to the applicable federal, state, and municipal regulations. Control charts are the preferred statistical method for control of packaging line weighing and filling systems. The primary purpose of control charting is to show trends in weight toward minimum and maximum limits. Although the control chart indicates when the established limits have been exceeded, its main purpose is to provide the means of anticipating and correcting whatever causes may be responsible for defective weights. Prevention of weights outside the acceptable range, rather than just discovery and correction of unsatisfactory lots is the fundamental principle involved. Some other benefits for control-chart statistical weight-control systems include: • Reduction of operator bias in the recording and use of the weight data • More concise adjustment criteria potential for the packaging equipment operation • Better understanding of each packaging line through continuous collection and analysis of data • Ability to isolate and correct definable causes of process variation
12.4.2.7 Quality Cost System Product quality has two readily identifiable stages: design and conformance. Quality of design is the degree to which the product satisfies the customer. Quality of conformance is the degree to which a product conforms to the specification. Costwise, expenses associated with quality of design are considered unavoidable because they are necessary to produce the product. Generally, the unavoidable quality of design costs includes:
Quality Management
519
• Sales and marketing costs involved with determining the customer’s quality requirements • Product development costs to create the product and process to meet the identified quality requirements • Product development and quality assurance costs of translating the product requirements into a specification form that meets the requirements of operations • Operations costs needed to secure the process required to meet the product specification • Standard costs identified for the product, which usually include the raw materials, ingredients, processing aids, processing, direct labor, maintenance, depreciation, overhead, laboratory control analysis, and product shrink
Quality of conformance improvements or avoidable cost reduction creates an inverse relationship between quality and costs. As the quality of a product improves because of decreases in variation, there should be a reduction in manufacturing costs. This cost reduction is a result of reducing the level of poor-quality products. Evaluating the cost of poor quality involves more than simply determining the cost of production and correction or disposal of bad products. The four areas contributing to poor quality costs are • Internal failure: Costs attributed to the production of defective product not shipped to a customer • External failure: Costs attributed to the production of defective product that is shipped to the customer • Appraisal: Costs related to monitoring the process and determining the condition of the process • Prevention: Costs related to minimizing the level of failure and appraisal costs
Some quality of conformance costs can be avoided at a minimal expense, such as centering the result of a capable process, relaxation of an exceptionally tight tolerance, or rectifying a specification misunderstanding. Other quality costs are avoidable through a substantial but still economic investment, such as changes in the process, new equipment, or more extensive process controls. Still other quality costs are avoidable only through investment costs greater than the value of the resulting cure.5 A major quality question for any company is whether to enter into a program for reducing loss caused by defects and, if so, in which areas. Computation of an accurate cost of quality will provide the data to determine if the costs associated with quality of conformance are a major problem and, if so, the most lucrative areas to attack first. If expenses are considered minor, then the question is how to maintain this level of quality. Routine cost of quality updates would alert management of trends toward either an improvement or a decrease in the level of quality. A decreasing level of quality identified by any indicator should naturally trigger consideration of corrective actions. The distinction between avoidable and unavoidable costs for the cost of quality evaluation is not always clear cut. One suggestion for separation of the unavoidable from the avoidable costs is to assume that operations performed only occasionally
520
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
are avoidable. Prevention and appraisal activities can be complex, whereas external and internal failures require little consideration other than collecting accurate cost data. Below is a partial listing of the potential avoidable costs of an edible fats and oils operation, listed according to the four quality of conformance areas:
1. External failure costs: a. Returned product: Freight charges, extra handling, lost packaging supplies, product rework expense, rush order to replace, and so forth b. Complaints: Destroyed product, expense to evaluate complaints, customer expense, returned product expense, lost volume, lost customers and customer goodwill, and so forth 2. Internal failure costs: a. Reprocessing: Processing in excess of the standard for all processes from refining through warehousing b. Reblending: Additional blends past the first attempt to meet specified limits c. Heel disposal: Costs to utilize excess product d. Rework or regrade: Reprocessed product because of performance failures e. Scrap product: Product that cannot be salvaged due to contamination with foreign material f. Package problem: Repackaging or rework caused by faulty packaging or packaging error g. Overage product: Rework and reprocessing costs for packaged products in excess of the product shippable life h. Replacement production: Product production to replace unacceptable product i. Product giveaway: Packaged product weights over target and margarine or spread products with excess fat contents 3. Appraisal costs: a. Reinspection: Inspection requirements in excess of the specification requirements b. Resampling: Product resampled because of suspected error with the first sample c. Troubleshooting: To determine the cause of a complaint or internal failure d. Reanalysis: Product reanalyzed because of suspected error with the first analytical result 4. Preventive costs: a. Diagnosis: Determination of problem solution and expense b. Corrective actions: Expense for equipment or procedure required c. Retraining: Additional or new training of personnel
12.4.2.8 Label Approval Procedure Various agencies of the federal, state, and local governments have some authority over the labeling of food products, such as the FDA, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), U.S. Treasury Department (BATF), and the individual state and local governments. Some regulations, such as the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act, apply only to packages and labels that are intended to be displayed to consumers when sold at retail and shipped interstate. Other regulations specify special requirements for selected food products, for example, labeling requirements for fats and oils are different for a shortening processor than those
Quality Management
521
specified for a prepared food product. A shortening label must identify each source oil in the product in the order of predominance. A prepared food product utilizing the same shortening as an ingredient can list source oils not present in the product if they may sometimes be used for the shortening. These examples are just a few of the regulations involved in determining the acceptability of a label for a food product. The complexity of the regulations, along with the continuing changes, makes it necessary to have a procedure in place for a specialist to review all new and changed labels for conformance. Marketing normally designs product labels and packages to attract the attention of the customer. Quality assurance is the logical area to assume responsibility for assuring legality or conformance to regulations for all packaging and labels. These reviews must begin with the initial design and continue with proofs from printers and representative samples of the final production printing. The procedure developed must provide a means for ensuring that the evaluations are completed in a timely manner and that documentation of the results and a formal approval notification are sent to the necessary personal in marketing, purchasing, and operations. 12.5 METHODS Quality is not as simple as it seems. In the final analysis, it must relate to the end use of the product. There would be little merit in using a clean, light-colored oil for shortening production if it could not be used to produce a bland-flavored product with a predictable physical behavior and keepability, nor would a light-colored oil be suitable for retail salad oil if it clouds and has an oxidized flavor when bottled, etc. It is essential that edible fats and oils laboratories have the facilities and capabilities to certify that a product meets all the requirements for which it was intended, as well as all federal, state, and industrial standards required. Processing has a tremendous affect on oil quality. Some changes that occur, such as elimination of some of the odoriferous components or their precursors and reduction of color, are deliberate and beneficial to the quality of fats and oils. Other changes, such as isomerization and polymerization, are coincidental or unwanted. Monitoring and assessing oil quality at any given processing step is of utmost importance. Proper process control allows more efficient production of oils of superior quality. Control of the edible fats and oils processes and product quality is heavily dependent on the measurement methods used in the plant laboratories. These measurements are the basis for the acceptance and costs of raw materials, processing decisions, and release of the outgoing product. Additionally, laboratory evaluations are a means for improving product uniformity through constant assessment of the effects of process variables, equipment behavior, and processing procedure effects, thus accurate, precise, and reliable laboratory results are essential for quality production. Development of analytical procedures for fats and oils was one of the reasons for the organization of the Society of Cotton Products Analysts, known today as the American Oil Chemists’ Society (AOCS). It was recognized that uniform procedures were necessary for commodity trading, quality control in processing, storage
522
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
stability, nutritional labeling of food products, and describing the functionality of a product. Development of analytical methods remains a major effort of the AOCS; those that have wide use and applicability are published in the AOCS Official and Tentative Methods. Older, less satisfactory, or unused methods are dropped and new ones are added by the Uniform Methods Committee based on suggestions from members after testing and study by one of the technical committees. These methods have become the accepted analytical procedures for edible fats and oils throughout the world.6 The laboratory methods employed should generally be the ones universally accepted in the industry, both by suppliers of the raw materials and by purchasers of the finished goods; however, new products, techniques, or equipment may compel a laboratory to modify the methods for their use. In this case, the accepted methods provide a benchmark by which the new or modified methods and instruments can be evaluated. Additionally, various methods from other recognized associations or even in-house-developed evaluation procedures may have to be adopted for certain processes or products to meet the requirements for some specialized products. Therefore, evaluation methods specific to the available equipment and facilities should be developed for use in quality control laboratories. 12.5.1 Methods Format Laboratory methods are written instructions for the measurement of chemical, physical, and performance aspects of raw materials, ingredients, byproducts, and inprocess and finished fats and oils products. The methods utilized must be the most accurate and precise evaluations available and should indicate the reproducibility of a result. Clear, concise instructions that follow a logical sequence to the results are necessary for the required accuracy and precision. A definite style should be adopted for all internal laboratory methods to present the procedures in a manner that clearly communicates the requirements to the user analyst. A uniform format for laboratory methods, like all other procedures, should be observed to improve the understandability of the requirements. Figure 12.6 presents a form that can help maintain method uniformity. Use of this form with the following preparation guidelines should better maintain the style adopted: • Title: Provide a specific descriptive title or name. • Division: The methods may be grouped into divisions for easier reference, such as (1) chemical analysis, (2) physical analysis, (3) organoleptic analysis, (4) instrument analysis, (5) performance evaluations, (6) product analysis, (7) environmental analysis, or (8) miscellaneous analysis. • Effective date: Indicate the date this method was adopted or the date of the last revision. • Issue number: The number of changes for an individual method can be determined by the issue number. The next consecutive number is assigned with each change in a method. The issue number allows a rapid audit check to ensure that the most recent method edition is in use.
Quality Management
523
COMPANY NAME AND LOGO
LABORATORY METHODS
TITLE:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ISSUE NUMBER:
DIVISION:
SUPERSEDES:
METHOD:
ISSUE:
DATE:
METHOD NUMBER:
PAGE NUMBER: OF
Definition - A short description of the method Scope - Defines the application of the method Apparatus - List the equipment necessary to perform the method Reagents - Defines the reagents required and the proper preparation or method for preparation Procedure - Lists the step by step procedures to perform the evaluation Calculations - Shows the proper calculations with explanations to determine the proper results Reference - Refers to the method source of other pertinent information Notes - Information of particular importance to the method performance Precision - Identification of the precision and accuracy of the method DISTRIBUTION:
REASON FOR CHANGE:
ORIGINATOR:
CUSTODIAN:
DATE
DATE
Figure 12.6 Laboratory methods format and guidelines.
• Superseded information: Indicate the previous issue number and date of issue for the identified method for reference or referral, if required. • Method number: Numerical identification of the method assists in filing and retrieval. The method number and method title must have a permanent relationship. • Page number: Laboratory methods are rarely limited to one page; the method page number is related to the total number of pages (e.g., 2 of 18) to ensure that the entire method can be accessed. • Definition: Provide a short description of the method, the value of the result, and any specific information that may provide a better understanding of the method.
524
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
• Scope: Define the application of the method and any limitations. • Apparatus: List the laboratory equipment required for this analysis, including the manufacturer’s name, model numbers, and any other identification available for purchasing the desired apparatus. • Reagents: All reagents used in the method should be listed here, with sources of supply or referral to a preparation method for special solutions or standards. The grade and purity should be identified by the designation utilized by the laboratories suppliers. • Procedure: Clear, detailed instructions for performing the evaluation should follow a logical sequence to the end result. • Calculations: Identify the required calculations with an explanation of all factors. Prepared worksheets for involved determinations or calculations are helpful for recording observations, performing the calculation, and serving as a record for review, if necessary. • References: Provide background information and referrals to the original work, if necessary. • Notes: Provide information of particular importance to the method, such as safety considerations, potential problems, sensitivity, detection level, results reporting, and substitutions. • Precision: Identify the precision and accuracy of each method, when available. • Distribution: Identify the copy distribution for each method. Distribution by job function at specific locations rather than by names of personnel ensures that all the necessary functions and locations are covered. A distribution letter and number code, similar to the proposal for specification distribution, saves space on the methods sheets. • Reason for change: The reason-for-change requirement alerts users to the specific changes and the reason for each change. A further aid to identifying changes is a “c” indicator in the right-hand margin in line with the actual change. • Originator: The signature of the originator, usually the method developer, indicates that the method has been reviewed for accuracy. • Custodian: Authorization by a custodian minimizes the risk of losing uniformity among the laboratory methods. • Custodian and originator’s date: Documents the dates that the method was reviewed and signed.
12.6 PROCESS CONTROL OVERVIEW Edible fats and oils processes are more difficult to control than the physical operations performed in most mechanical industries. Three major evaluation methods are available for the inspection and testing of products to control the quality of the products produced:
1. Screening: Inspection of every unit to screen out defects; sometimes called 100% inspection 2. Lot-by-lot inspection: Examination of a relatively small number of samples to judge the acceptability of the entire lot 3. Process control: Addresses all causes of defective products — operator, operation, equipment, or raw material — to discover defective product where and when it occurs so corrective action can be taken immediately
Quality Management
525
Most of the edible fats and oils controls are chemical in nature and require analysis of raw materials, analysis during processing, and analysis of outgoing products. Two of these areas are controlled by screening-type evaluations to determine conformance to specifications and to determine the acceptability of the lot or shipment. The first of the screening-controlled areas is well established within the vegetable oils trade. These raw materials are purchased on the basis of specific analytical limits, and trading rules establish the standards of quality for the various types of each source oil. Analyses of “official” samples are the basis for settlement adjustments for many of the oils traded. Inspection and testing of the outgoing products, performed to ensure that the customer’s requirements have been met, are screening-type evaluations for bulk shipments, but are lot-by lot evaluations for packaged products. These analyses are surveillance or after-the-fact controls. The evaluation point is at a go/no-go location; either the product is acceptable for shipment or it must be rejected for reprocessing or downgraded or some other remedy must be applied. Process control is the most important function for product acceptability. If each step in the process is correct and the flow or sequence is proper, the desired quality will be found in the finished product. Process control requires planning to establish the relative importance of each quality characteristic, points in the process to measure, and the methods and procedures for the measurement. The elements of a process quality control system include:
1. Control point determination: Establishment of control points is necessary to ensure that all of the requirements are met in all areas. The quality of the finished product may be predicted by measurements obtained at correctly established control points in the process, beginning with the raw material and concluding with shipment of the product. The evaluation points must be preventive, participative, and practical (i.e., before, not after, the fact); must involve all processes; and must be understandable and enforceable. 2. Process capability: The degree of inherent variability in each process must be established to determine if predetermined quality levels can be satisfied and at what confidence level with the existing equipment and procedures. Product requirements outside the process capabilities will generate unacceptable products through the “sorting” process, which rejects products that do not meet all of the specified limits. 3. Control sampling: Every sample point specified must be established carefully to ensure that the data collected will have a real value. Meaningless results from insignificant sample points can mask significant problems and divert energies in the wrong direction. The normal sample points for most semicontinuous edible fats and oils processes utilized are a. Start up: Analysis of samples to ensure that the process is in control b. Stream: Analysis of samples after predetermined time periods to ensure that the process remains in control c. Finished batch: Analysis of a designed batch or lot to ensure that the process has remained in control to meet all of the finished process limits 4. In-process analysis: The interrelationships and links with upstream and downstream operations must be assessed for each process and each analysis. The analysis specified must have been considered in light of the process requirements to provide the required
526
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
performance of the finished product. The expected variation from each analytical method must also be considered when the tolerances for the limits are established. 5. Finished product acceptance: Conformance to specification is determined by the inspection and testing of the product after the final process. The analysis at this point should be minimal to ensure that changes have not occurred after the inprocess control limits were satisfied.
Process control development for edible fats and oils requires skill in the art of processing as well as technical competence. The technical competence required includes not only knowledge of the process conditions and effects but also access to past performance records that indicate product changes to expect when process conditions are varied. Further, it is necessary to understand how these changes affect overall product quality as measured by a complete analytical profile. 12.7 CRUDE FATS AND OILS PROCESS CONTROL Incoming analyses of crude fats and oils are performed for several specific reasons: (1) cost adjustment, (2) identification of required process treatments, (3) assessment of quality of receipts, (4) safety and (5) vendor rating. Most of the vegetable oils are purchased on the basis of specific trading rules that identify certain quality limits and adjustments in costs for deviations from those limits. Four associations with trading rules for specific source oils are the National Cottonseed Products Association, National Soybean Processors Association, Canadian Oil Processors Association, and National Institute of Oilseed Products. The trading rules are specific for each source oil, but most specify limits for refining loss, refined color, refined and bleached color, free fatty acid, moisture and volatile matter, and flash point. Normally, cost adjustments are made on results outside the specified limits of the trading rule. Flash point evaluations at receipt are safety precautions to ensure that the oil does not contain any solvent remaining from the extraction process; the solvents used are explosive. Free fatty acid content determines the caustic treat required for most refined oils. Refined and bleached colors can determine the refining process requirements and the bleach treatments required to achieve the desired finished-product color requirements. For example, high-color cottonseed oil may require additional refining to achieve the desired red color, or soybean oil with high chlorophyll will probably require a higher bleaching media treatment. The crude analyses also provide data for a vendor quality rating. Results summaries readily indicate good and problem suppliers. Other helpful raw material analyses, sometimes required on a skip-lot basis at certain periods of the year or as the result of a particular problem, include: • Iodine value: Changes in the unsaturation level of the fat or oil receipt caused by new crop, growing season, or feed or for other reasons can affect the finished product formulation or intermediate processing. Early knowledge of these changes will allow planning to compensate for the changes. • Fatty acid composition: Suspected changes in the raw materials can be identified more precisely with this analysis than by iodine value. Nutritional labeling and
Quality Management
527
other specialty product performance requirements may preclude the use of some receipts or cause a blend of the same source oil from different suppliers to meet the requirements. Purity of a particular fat and oil can also be determined rapidly with fatty acid composition analysis. • Trace metals: Determination of trace metals in vegetable oils, usually present in parts per million (ppm) quantities, has always been a formidable problem; however, studies have shown that calcium and magnesium levels above 100 ppm in crude oils can cause problems after apparent adequate caustic refining. Calcium and magnesium depress the hydration of the phospholipids, leaving some in the refined oil. Levels of residual phosphorus in refined and bleached oils over 1.0 ppm can poison hydrogenation catalyst and/or cause off-flavors.7 Periodic trace metal analysis can effectively monitor crude oil receipts quality.
Even with the crude oil analysis, more than one sample point exists. Samples from three separate control points can require analysis: (1) the official sample is taken by the seller at loading, (2) a destination sample is obtained at receipt, and (3) during storage. The official sample analyses are the trading-rule basis for settlement. The destination sample requires only minimal testing to verify the official sample results, unless it becomes the official sample when the seller fails to obtain one on loading. Sample analysis from storage should be performed to monitor the oil quality bimonthly. Again, only minimal testing is necessary — probably free fatty acid, moisture, and, at times, a bleach color. Rendered animal fats have no association trading rules, which means that the incoming quality requirements other than the USDA inspection must be established with the supplier if uniformity is expected. Meat fats are reasonably uniform raw materials. Lard and tallow consistency varies somewhat from season to season, but these variations usually present no real or serious operating problems. However, the product quality characteristics can vary, depending on the method of rendering utilized by the supplier. Incoming analyses for meat-fat receipts should include the following: • Organoleptic: The flavor and odor should be characteristic of the product, that is, they should not be sour or have a strong boar odor that escalates with heating. • Moisture: A high moisture level (above 0.2%) may be a contributor to off-flavor or high free fatty acid caused by hydrolysis. • Impurities: Proteinaceous impurities in meat fat can be revealed during deodorization when they cause very dark colors. Evaluation with an effective filtration method or a heating test simulating deodorizer conditions alerts operations that this receipt must be specially filtered before use. • Color: A high red color (above 1.5 Lovibond red) may indicate that the product has been heat abused in rendering and requires special bleaching. A green tallow, due to high chlorophyll content, requires bleaching with an acid-activated media.
12.8 REFINING PROCESS CONTROL The impurities in vegetable oils consist of phospholipids, metal complexes (notably iron, calcium, and magnesium), free fatty acid, peroxides and their breakdown
528
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
products, meal, waxes, moisture, dirt, and pigments. These impurities are present in true solution, as well as colloidal suspension, and their removal is necessary to achieve the finished oil quality standards for flavor, appearance, consistency, and stability required by end-use product applications.8 The primary processing system used to purify crude vegetable oils in the United States is a combination of degumming and caustic centrifugal refining. As an option, crude oils can be degummed before refining by a water treatment, followed by centrifugation to remove the hydrated gums for lecithin production. Crude or degummed oils are treated with sodium hydroxide to saponify impurities for removal by a primary centrifuge as soapstock. The refined oil is water washed to remove soap traces and again centrifuged to remove the hydrated soap. Refined, water-washed oil is finally vacuum dried to remove the traces of moisture remaining. Refined-oil quality standards must be established for each source oil; however, the control points are basically the same for all oils: • Before refining: Prior to refining, each batch of crude oil should be analyzed for free fatty acid, neutral oil or cup loss, and bleach color. The caustic treat is calculated based on the amount required to neutralize the free fatty acid plus a predetermined excess to ensure removal of other impurities, such as phosphatides and color bodies. Usually, concentrated sodium hydroxide is diluted with water to obtain the desired Baumé (Bé) concentration. Analysis for percent NaOH and °Bé should confirm that the desired dilution has been attained — normally, 20 to 50 °Bé for cottonseed oil; 16 to 24 °Bé for soybean, sunflower, peanut, and corn oils; and 12 °Bé for palm, palm kernel, and coconut oils. Some refiners use pH to ensure that the reaction mixture contains the proper caustic treat before the primary centrifuge; pH targets will range from 9.8 for lauric oils to 10.8 for cottonseed oil.9 • Primary performance: Soap analysis should be performed on the oil exiting the primary centrifuge to maintain a soap level compatible with the water-wash capability, usually 300 ppm maximum. High soap contents, above 500 ppm, that cannot be corrected with back-pressure adjustments indicate that the machine requires cleaning. Some refiners utilize a spin test to provide a quick estimate of moisture to indicate the soap content at this point. This evaluation consists of spinning the oil sample for 1.5 minutes in a high-speed centrifuge using a calibrated 10-cubic centimeter tube. Hourly checks are recommended to ensure that the product is consistent.10 The soapstock should be monitored for neutral oil content at least every four hours. Neutral oil in soapstock should be less than 18% on a dry basis. • Water wash performance: The soapy water solution from the secondary centrifuge should be composited over a shift and analyzed for neutral oil content. The neutral oil content should be less than 0.05%. • Dried oil evaluation: Final refined oil control samples are generally obtained downstream from the vacuum drier. At this point, moisture should not exceed 0.1%, and, in most cases, a soap content of <50 ppm and <0.05% free fatty acid are the specified limits for most oils. Phosphatide-containing source oils, such as soybean and canola, are also controlled by the residual gum level. Refined oil gums precipitate when treated with acetone for visual quantity estimates or more specific determinations with spectrophotometer evaluations. Another qualitative method utilized is the acid heat break test; 60 to 150 milliliters of refined oil are heated
Quality Management
529
with three drops of concentrated hydrochloric acid to 550°F (288°C); and the visual appearance is observed. Any darkening or dark residue indicates incomplete refining. With other oils, such as cottonseed oil, completeness of refining is controlled by comparing the laboratory-refined and plant-refined oil color results. • As refined finished oil: Every batch should be analyzed for color, free fatty acid, moisture, soap, phosphorus, impurities, and other evaluations specific for the source oil or the individual operation. The color, free fatty acid, moisture, and soap results should match the production results and meet the specification limits. A plant-refined oil bleach color significantly lower than the laboratory results indicates unnecessary over refining. Phosphorus content must have been reduced to less than 30 ppm if standard prebleaching is utilized. If any of these analyses indicate a problem, steps must be taken to correct them in prebleaching or re-refining must be considered.
The process control quality standards for refining crude soybean oil may be specified as shown in Table 12.1. Traditionally, the method used to refine meat fats has been what is now identified as physical refining. The impurities in meat fat consist of proteinaceous material from the rendering process and free fatty acid. The proteinaceous material must be removed by filtration with low levels of bleaching clay or diatomaceous earth or, alternatively, by water washing followed by bleaching. After clarification, the clean dry meat fats can be further processed (i.e., deodorized or hydrogenated and deodorized).11 Typical quality standards for a physical refining process control specification for tallow are presented in Table 12.2. Table 12.1 Caustic Refining Process Control Specification: Soybean Oil Composition
Spec No
Percent
Crude Soybean Oil
0002
100.0
Refined Soybean Oil
0032
100.0
Quality Standards Free fatty acid, %
From
From
After
To
Primary
Water
Vacuum
As
Refining
Centrifuge
Wash
Dryer
Refined
1.0
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
Neutral oil loss: 2.5
X
X
X
X
Soapstock, % max
Crude oil, % max
X
18.0
0.05
X
X
Soap, ppm
X
300
X
30
30 0.1
Moisture, %
X
X
X
0.1
Heat break test
X
X
X
negative
X
Phosphorous, max
X
X
X
X
30
Visible impurities
X
X
X
none
none
Bleach color, max
3.5
X
X
X
3.5
X
X
X
X
30
Chlorophyll, ppm max
Notes: X = do not analyze; max = maximum; ppm = parts per million.
530
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 12.2 Physical Refining Process Control Specification: Tallow Composition Rendered Tallow Physical Refined Tallow Quality Standards Lovibond red color, max
Spec No
Percent
0004
100.0
0064
100.0
To
Stream
As
Filter
Sample
Filtered
1.0
1.0
1.0
Free fatty acid, % max
0.4
0.4
0.4
Moisture, % max
0.2
0.1
0.1
negative
negative
negative
0.5
0.5
0.5
Impurities test High heat color rise, max Note: max = maximum.
12.9 PREBLEACHING PROCESS CONTROL Prebleaching of edible oils is popularly and correctly regarded as the partial or complete removal of color; however, bleaching is also an integral process in both chemical and physical refining systems. Bleaching is relied on to clean up the traces of soap and phosphatides remaining after caustic neutralization and water washing for the chemical refining system. The technical feasibility of physical refining depends on bleaching as a pretreatment to remove phosphatides, trace metals, waxes, and color pigments. Another very important function of bleaching in both refining techniques is the removal of peroxides and secondary oxidation products. On bleaching startup, the oil should be recirculated through the filter until the desired bleach oil color and peroxide value is achieved, the soap is removed, and a clean filterable impurities test and an acceptable heat-stress color are attained. A typical heat-stress color test consists of heating the oil sample to 320°F (160°C) over a four- to six-minute period and immediately determining the Lovibond red color for comparison to the oil color before heating. A heat-stress color increase indicates incomplete removal of the phosphatides. Color and filterable impurities evaluations should be repeated hourly to ensure that a filtration problem has not developed and that the oil quality is consistent. Vegetable oils likely to have high chlorophyll contents, such as soybean and canola oils, should be bleached to a chlorophyll content, rather than the usual red color endpoints; a limit of 50 ppb is utilized on the basis of the finished product requirements. Every batch of bleached vegetable oil should be analyzed for color, soap, filterable impurities, free fatty acid, and peroxide value. The finished oil analysis should be consistent with the in-process results. The free fatty acid content should be 0.1 to 0.2% higher than the refined oil, especially when acid-activated bleaching earths are utilized. Phosphorus results for vegetable oils, such as soybean and canola oils, must be lower than 5 ppm if the oil is to be successfully hydrogenated or deodorized. For canola and corn oils, sulfur levels should be determined to ensure that they have
Quality Management
531
Table 12.3 Prebleaching Process Control Specification: Soybean Oil Composition
Spec No
Percent
Refined Soybean Oil
0032
100.0
Refined and Bleached Soybean Oil
0062
100.0
Quality Standards
To
Stream
As
Prebleach
Sample
Prebleached
Lovibond red color, max
X
6.0
6.0
Heat stress color rise, max
X
none
none
Peroxide value, meq/kg
X
0
0
Soap, ppm, max
50
0
0
Impurities test
X
negative
negative
Chlorophyll, ppb max
300
50
50
X
0.1
0.1
0.05
X
0.07
Phosphorous, ppm max
X
X
5
Cold test, hours min
X
X
25
Bleaching earth,a %
X
X
X
Spent earth oil,a %
X
X
30.0
Moisture, % max Free fatty acid, % max
Notes:
a = analyze bi-monthly; ppb = parts per billion; ppm = parts per million; max = maximum; min = minimum; meq/kg = milliequivalents per kilogram.
been reduced to less than 5 ppm. Sulfur adversely affects hydrogenation reaction rates and deodorized oil flavor.10 Periodically, or if the bleaching media addition rate is questioned, the amount of bleaching earth in the oil should be determined. This can be done by filtering the bleaching earth out of a known sample quantity, washing the filtrate with a solvent, drying the cake, and weighing it to determine the percent treat. This periodic evaluation will ensure that the bleaching earth addition is accurate. Excessive bleaching earth usage results in high oil losses without benefit, and insufficient earth usage reduces product quality. The spent bleaching earth should occasionally be evaluated for oil content. This is to ensure that the correct filter blowing and steaming practices are being observed. Excessive filter blowing will reduce the spent earth oil content to less than 30%, which can present a fire hazard, and the final oil steamed from the earth can be of poor enough quality to affect the entire batch. Insufficient filter blowing results in a high oil loss to the spent earth. Contamination is a concern with bleaching systems utilized for different source oils. This problem can be identified by changes in the iodine value for most oils, or if the source oil is a natural winter oil a cold test will point out any contamination.10 Typical quality standards for bleached soybean oil could be specified as shown in Table 12.3. The bleaching system can be used as the clarification or filtering step to remove impurities from meat fat as previously reviewed for refining process control. Meat fats require little bleaching unless they have been heat abused or have a green-
532
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
colored tallow caused by high chlorophyll content. A green color is more noticeable in tallow because of the usual lack of red and yellow coloration. The chlorophyll is readily removed with acid-activated bleaching earth. 12.10 MODIFICATION PROCESSES Fats and oils modification processes have been instrumental in the growth of liquid vegetable’s oil utilization. To extend liquid vegetable oils food applications, they are modified by chemical or physical processes. Modification processes to alter the physical properties of the oils include: (1) hydrogenation, (2) interesterification, (3) fractionation, and (4) blending. These modification processes are performed after chemical refining and bleaching, but before deodorization to allow distillation of certain impurities developed during the modification processes. The primary objective of these processes is to produce higher melting basestocks suitable for the production of margarine, shortening, and other specialized fats and oils products. The product produced by the different modification processes is achieved differently for each process: hydrogenation changes the fatty acid composition, interesterification redistributes the fatty acids, and fractionation physically separates hard and soft fractions. Hydrogenation was until recently the preferred process to modify the melting properties and oxidative stability in the United States. It alters the physical characteristics by isomerization and saturation of the unsaturation fatty acids. However, nutritional research has connected the products of hydrogenation, trans-isomers and saturated fatty acids, with undesirable effects on both low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. Clinical studies support findings that both trans and saturated fatty acids increase LDL cholesterol similarly, but saturated fatty acids increases HDL (good) cholesterol whereas trans fatty acid does not.12 As a result of these findings, health organizations recommended that trans fatty acids consumption be reduced. The FDA revised the labeling regulations to include a listing of trans content on the Nutritional Facts Panel for food products as of January 1, 200613 to help consumers develop more healthful diets and provide food processors an incentive to improve their products’ nutritional quality.14 Elimination or reduction of trans fatty acids has necessitated the reformulation of most shortening and margarine products to include naturally stable oils, fully hydrogenated oils (trans-free), modified hydrogenation procedures, and alternate modification processes to produce suitable basestocks. The alternate modification processes to replace hydrogenation are random and directed interesterification using chemical and enzymatic catalyst, fractionation and the use of trait-enhanced oils. These process changes and the labeling requirements to include saturated and trans fatty acid contents on packaged food products have increased the necessity for process control. The modified basestocks must be monitored to ensure that the saturated and trans fatty acids are within the established limits to produce fats and oils ingredients that conform to the Nutritional Facts Panel declarations of the food processors products. Compliance with the regulations for saturated and trans fatty acids will be determined
Quality Management
533
in the same manner as with total fat — If the fatty acid content is under declared by 20% or more, the product will be considered to be misbranded by the FDA.15,16 Partial hydrogenation is the major source of trans fatty acids, but any high temperature process can also isomerize unsaturated fatty acids. Trans fatty acid development is negligible below 220°C (428°F), becomes significant between 220 and 240°C (428 and 464°F), and is nearly exponential above 240°C (464°F). Products with high polyunsaturated fatty acids are particularly sensitive to trans isomerization. The isomerization rate can be expressed as: C-18:3 (100) >> C-18:2 (10) >> C-18:1 (6).17 Therefore, process control and analytical monitoring must be implemented to ensure compliance with label declarations for trans as well as saturated fatty acids. This requirement includes unsaturated fatty acids when they are declared. 12.10.1 Hydrogenation Process Control Edible fats and oils are hydrogenated for two reasons. First, flavor stability is improved by reducing the number of double bonds or sites for oxygen addition. Second, the physical characteristics are changed so the product has more utility. Hydrogenation has been the major modification process used to produce the unique physical characteristics required for shortenings, margarines, frying fats, coating fats, and other specialty products. Hydrogenation involves the chemical addition of hydrogen to unsaturated fatty acids. The reaction is carried out by mixing heated oil and hydrogen gas in the presence of a catalyst. Hydrogenation can be continued until all of the double bonds are saturated or until only partially hydrogenated. In practice, the conditions utilized for the hydrogenation process allow certain reactions to proceed at a faster rate than others and provide different degrees of selectivity or the preferential reduction of the unsaturated fatty acids in the oil. A huge variety of products can be produced with the hydrogenation process, depending on the conditions used and degree of saturation. The fatty acid composition and resultant characteristics of the hydrogenated products depend on the controllable factors: temperature, pressure, agitation, catalyst activity, catalyst type, and catalyst concentration. Changes in the reaction conditions affect the selectivity of the hydrogenated basestock. Selectivity affects the slope of the solids fat index (SFI) or solids fat content (SFC) curves; steep slopes are produced with selective hydrogenation conditions, whereas flat slopes are the result of nonselective hydrogenation. The hydrogenation-controllable conditions must be identified for process control specifications: catalyst type, nickel percent, temperature, and pressure. The other controllable factor, agitation, is usually fixed in plant converters so the speed or pitch cannot be varied. The oil to be hydrogenated must be of suitable quality for effective hydrogenation. In general, the requirements should be the same as those for prebleached oils: less than 0.07 free fatty acid, less than 1 ppm soap, 0.1% maximum moisture, low color, 5 ppm maximum phosphorus, and 10 meq/kg maximum peroxide value. All of these impurities can act as catalyst poisons. Phosphorus in the form of phosphatides mainly affects selectivity to produce a higher degree of saturation with a decrease in trans-isomers. Moisture inactivates the catalyst and may promote free
534
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
fatty acid formation by hydrolysis. Soap reacts with the nickel catalyst to form nickel soaps, which proportionally reduces the available nickel. The oil analysis should be rechecked to hydrogenation if the oil has been in storage after prebleaching for any length of time. Hydrogen gas used for hydrogenation should be 99+% pure. Gaseous impurities, especially sulfur compounds, such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S), sulfur oxide (SO2), and carbon disulfide (CS2), are very injurious to catalyst activity. Impurities, such as carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrogen (N2), do not affect catalyst activity.18 Normally, a basestock system of hydrogenated products with varying degrees of hardness and selectivity is produced for subsequent blending with other basestocks or unhardened oils to produce the desired finished product. Consistency of most fats and oils finished products is controlled using standard AOCS analytical methods, such as the solids fat index, iodine value, and melting points. However, time restraints during the hydrogenation process require more rapid controls. The sampling method for hydrogenation control most generally consists of drawing samples for analysis at short intervals while approaching the desired endpoint. Three different control evaluations are used to determine the endpoints on the basis of the hardness of the basestock: • Soft basestocks: The refractive index (RI) of oils is related to the degree of saturation. For a given oil, the refractive index is almost linearly related to the iodine value analysis, but it can be affected by factors, such as free fatty acid, oxidation, and polymerization. RI alone is a satisfactory control for hydrogenation reactions to produce basestocks with an iodine value of 90 or higher. Batch to batch, SFI results have been relatively uniform with RI controls for soft basestocks when the starting oil iodine values are consistent. • Intermediate hardness basestocks: Oils hardened to iodine values less than 90 produce increasing amounts of trans-isomers that have a marked effect upon SFI results. Consequently, it is essential that the intermediate basestocks be controlled with a refractive index and a melting point analysis. Generally, it is the practice to hydrogenate to a refractive index as an advisory limit, but the actual control is the Mettler dropping point. AOCS method Cc 18-80 measures the temperature at which an oil sample becomes fluid enough to flow after conditioning in a freezer for 15 minutes. • Hardstocks: Hydrogenation of low iodine value hardstocks is far less critical than for any other type of hydrogenated product. These oils are saturated to iodine values of less than 10 where trans-isomers are eliminated and melting points are usually in excess of 130°F (54°C). Refractive index is rarely used to control hardstocks because of the high melting points. Quick titer evaluations are good control evaluations for these products. The test consists of dipping a titer thermometer into the hardened oil sample and rotating it between the fingers until the fat clouds on the thermometer bulb. Each oil type and iodine value will produce a different result that makes the quick titer accurate enough for control of this hydrogenation process.19
Successful hydrogenation endpoint analysis may be used to release product to the next process, postbleach, and further to storage or blending, especially if the basestock
Quality Management
535
is produced routinely and statistical evaluations indicate that the process is in control. The practice of holding all hydrogenated batches separate until all the consistency analyses have been completed must be balanced against the cost of lost production and time. A complete SFI profile can require six hours from the time that the analysis is started. Nevertheless, the consistency analysis should be determined on each batch or at some other predetermined frequency for high-volume basestocks to verify the relationship between the quick controls and the more time-consuming analyses for solids fat index, iodine value, melting points, fatty acid compositions, etc. Before the filtered product is released to postbleaching, the oil should be analyzed for color, free fatty acid, and nickel content. A qualitative evaluation should be adequate at this point, such as adding ammonium sulfide to a sample obtained after the catalyst filter. If a black precipitate forms, nickel is present. This test has been found to be sensitive to approximately 2-ppm nickel; more accurate determinations require atomic absorption or other more precise but time-consuming analyses. The filtered catalyst should be tested on a periodic basis to ensure that the proper filter blowing practices are being observed. The nickel content of the filtrate affects the salability of this waste product to reclaimers, which may be the best means of disposal. The hydrogenated oil color should be lighter than the oil before hydrogenation because of heat bleaching. A darker color could indicate incomplete filtration or too high a drop temperature from the pressurized vessel into the atmosphere. Filterable impurities analysis should differentiate between the two causes for the dark color. Free fatty acid content should be only slightly higher than the bleached starting oil unless an abnormally long reaction time was necessary. A high free fatty acid content could indicate that the oil to the converter was wet. A high moisture could alter the SFI/melting point/IV relationships by poisoning the catalyst. Typical quality standards for a hydrogenated soybean oil basestock process control specification are illustrated in Table 12.4. 12.10.2 Interesterification Process Control The ability to modify the melting point and functional crystallization characteristics without changing the fatty acid composition has made the interesterification process a leading candidate to replace hydrogenation. Two variations of interesterification practiced are random and directed. Typically, random interesterification is utilized to change a flat solids fat slope to a steeper one better suited for margarines and some shortening products. It also slows down the transition to the stable β-crystal form to stabilize the product in the β′-crystal form. Directed interesterification produces a high level of trisaturates with temperature manipulation. The directed process has the potential of converting a liquid oil into a plastic shortening or margarine product depending on the fatty acid composition of the starting oil. Both of these interesterification variations can utilize chemical or enzyme catalyst. Nonspecific lipases provide a random redistribution reaction like the chemical catalyst, but most of the lipase catalysts are 1,3 specific, which means that only the fatty acids at the outside positions of the triglyceride take part in the reaction. The fatty acids at the sn-2 position are not affected.
536
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 12.4 Hydrogenated Process Control Specification: Soybean Oil Basestock Composition
Spec No
Percent
Refined and Bleached Soybean Oil
0062
100.0
Hydrogenated Soybean Oil Basestock
0632
100.0
To
From
As
Converter
Converter
Filtered
Moisture, % max
Quality Standards
0.1
X
X 0.1
Free fatty acid, % max
0.07
X
Lovibond red color, max
A
X
(a)
Peroxide value, meq/kg
10.0
X
12.0
X
none
Filterable impurities, max
none
Refractive index @ 46°C
A
Mettler dropping point, °C
X
30.0 ± 1.0
10.0°C/50°F
X
18.0 ± 3.0
X
21.1°C/70°F
X
8.0 ± 2.0
X
1.45470 ± 0.00030 30.0 ± 1.0
Solids fat index
33.3°C/92°F
X
3.0 ± 2.0
X
Iodine value
X
85.0 ± 2.0
85.0 ± 2.0 X
Fatty Acids, % Saturated
X
22.7 ± 2.0
Trans
X
16.6 ± 1.5
X
Qualitative nickel
X
X
negative
Hydrogenation Conditions: Gassing temperature, °F Hydrogenation temperature, °F Pressure, bar
300 350 1.4 ± 0.1
Catalyst, % nickel
0.02
Catalyst type
new
Notes: A = analyze, (a) = lighter than to converter, X = do not analyze.
12.10.2.1 Random Interesterification Using Chemical Catalyst Random interesterification has the greatest effect when the starting blend is composed of oils differing widely in melting characteristics. A mixture of two radically different fats is always far from a random distribution of fatty acids and, therefore, will respond to interesterification. In particular, a mixture of highly saturated fat with a liquid oil will be considerably lowered in melting point by random rearrangement because the saturated fatty acids become more widely distributed.20 Table 12.5 reviews the process control specification for the interesterification of a blend of two radically different basestocks, that is, 70% cottonseed oil and 30% cottonseed oil hardstock.21-23
Quality Management
537
Table 12.5 Random Interesterification Process Control Specification: CSO Basestock Composition
Spec No
Percent
Tolerance
Refined and Bleached Cottonseed Oil
0061
70.0
± 1.0
60-Titer Cottonseed Oil
6401
30.0
± 1.0
Interesterified CSO Basestock
6681
100.0
To
As
End-Point
As
Quality Standards
Interesterification
Dried
Control
Interesterified
Free Fatty Acid, %
<0.1
X
X
1.0
0.1
0.01
X
A
X
X
<10
Moisture, % Peroxide Value, meq/kg Soap, % Mettler dropping point, °C
<10 <0.1
X
X
53.5 ± 1.0
X
43.0 ± 1.0
43.0 ± 1.0
1.0
Solids Fat Index 10.0°C–50°F
31.5 ± 3.0
X
X
24.0 ± 2.0
21.1°C–70°F
31.5 ± 3.0
X
X
16.5 ± 2.0
26.7°C–80°F
31.5 ± 3.0
X
X
14.5 ± 2.0
33.3°C–92°F
31.5 ± 3.0
X
X
12.5 ± 1.5
40.0°C–104°F
21.0 ± 2.0
X
X
4.5 ± 1.0
Notes: A = analyze; X = do not analyze; CSO = cottonseed oil.
Interesterification chemical catalysts are alkaline substances that are sensitive to acids. Therefore, it is essential to neutralize the feedstock to free fatty acid (FFA) levels below 0.1%. Higher levels necessitate the use of more catalyst; each additional 0.05% FFA requires about 0.01% additional catalyst. Moisture also inactivates chemical catalyst: 0.01% moisture neutralizes about 0.04% catalyst. Oils to be interesterified should be dried before the catalyst is added to below 0.01% moisture to prevent excessive catalyst inactivation and the accompanying additional product loss. Apart from FFA and moisture, peroxides and soap also have a negative effect on interesterification. Bleaching before interesterification should be performed when the peroxide value of the feedstock blend exceeds 10 meq/kg to remove secondary oxidation products or if it contains soap.23 The preventive measures are essential to prevent excessive loses with the interesterification process. Each 0.1% addition of catalyst results in a neutral oil loss of about 1% after catalyst neutralization, postbleaching, and deodorization.24 The reaction end-point has been confirmed by monitoring changes in color, melting point, and solid fat profiles. A brown color develops at the onset of the rearrangement reaction, but complete rearrangement requires a time period after the color onset depending on factors, such as catalyst choice, reaction temperature, oil quality, and so forth. Specific changes in absorbance at 320 to 450 µm of 0.4 to 1.0, or the melting point and/or solids fat profile based on previous experience
538
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
are end-point methods utilized.25 The reaction time should be kept to a minimum to prevent excessive losses and protect oxidative stability. Evaluations have shown that total tocopherol content was higher with monitoring to prevent excessive reaction times.26 After completion of the reaction has been confirmed, the catalyst is often neutralized in the same reaction vessel. Neutralization may include the addition of phosphoric or citric acid prior to water addition and postbleaching. When water combines with sodium methylate, sodium hydroxide and methyl alcohol form. Both will react with neutral oil to form soap and methyl esters. Initial management of the catalyst requirement and neutralization with acid prior to water addition, will help keep the processing losses to a minimum.25 The theoretical losses for postbleaching and deodorization can be used as a base for monitoring the process. In postbleaching, the bleaching earth added adsorbs 30 to 35% oil; between 0.5 to 1.0% bleaching earth is typical, resulting in a 0.15 to 0.3% loss. Deodorization losses caused by the formation of FFA, fatty acid methyl esters during the interesterification reaction are equal to ~10 times the catalyst consumption. In a normal reaction with 0.1% chemical catalyst, the loss from FFA and fatty acid methyl esters would be 1% and the total loss, including those caused by mono- and diglycerides formed during the reaction, is in the neighborhood of 1.5 to 2%.27 12.10.2.2 Random Interesterification Using Enzyme Catalyst Enzymatic interesterification is becoming popular to produce products free of trans fatty acids and high value-added products. Lipases have distinct advantages compared to the classical chemical catalyst: (1) enzymes function at milder reaction conditions that minimize the production of side products,28 (2) enzyme-catalyzed reactions are more efficient and easier to control, (3) the unique specificities of enzymes allow the selection of a particular lipase for the desired application, and (4) the reaction is terminated by filtering to remove the catalyst that reduces losses and the necessity for postbleaching.29 The disadvantages of the enzymatic fats and oils interesterification include: (1) the reaction times are generally much longer because the reaction temperature is close to ambient, (2) the reaction temperature and pH must be closely controlled, (3) the impurities in the feedstock must be as low as possible to prevent inactivity of the enzyme catalyst, (4) the enzyme catalyst must be recovered or used continuously, and (5) liberated moisture causes hydrolysis and FFA development to effect a lower yield and product quality deterioration.30 A small amount of water is essential for maintaining enzymatic activity, but once the water content exceeds 2% the degree of interesterification decreases; 1% water content was found to be optimal.31 Drying of the enzyme and feedstock before use can decrease the FFA formation and improve the efficiency of the interesterification. Absorbents, such as diatomaceous earth and silica gel, have been used to dehydrate fats during the interesterification process. The degree of hydrolysis for an interesterification was 2.7% when reacted in the presence of the absorbents but 5.9% without.29
Quality Management
539
12.10.3 Fractionation Process Control Fractionation is a separation of triglycerides not individual fatty acids; it is a modification of the texture, crystallization, and melting behavior defined by the triglyceride composition. Fractionation of edible oils consists of the separation of oils into two or more fractions with different melting characteristics. Separation of the oil fractions is based on a distribution of the triglycerides between different phases. Fractionation can be accomplished with or without prior processing to remove nonglycerides. However, the yield and quality is better when the feedstock is neutralized. RB (refined and bleached) oils can increase the yield by ~ 5% over a crude oil feedstock and the fractions will have a better color and heat tolerance.32 The efficiency of the separation of the liquid and solid fractions depends particularly on the method of cooling, which determines the form and size of the crystals. Rapid cooling causes heavy supersaturation and produces a great number of small crystals resulting in the formation of a shapeless, small, soft precipitate with poor filtration properties. This form slowly transforms into the alpha form with a tendency to develop mixed crystals. Gradual cooling during crystallization results in stable β- and β′-crystal development that facilitates separation from the liquid form by filtration.33 Three distinct processes for the fractionation of triglycerides that couple crystallization and separation processes are practiced commercially: solvent, detergent, and dry fractionation. Solvent fractionation is the most efficient process, but has high operating costs. Detergent fractionation utilization has declined due to high operating costs and contamination of the end product. Dry fractionation is the simplest and least expensive process and improvements in its efficiency allow the production of fractions better than the detergent process and the production of many products previously requiring solvent fractionation.34 Dry fractionation is a two stage process. First the oil is crystallized by cooling the mixture in a controlled manner to the required temperature in specifically designed crystallizers. Crystallization control is accomplished by controlling the oil temperature. The cooling surface, the polymorphic behavior and intersolubility of the triglycerides in the oil determine the crystallization time required to achieve the desired crystal formation. Some oils, like cottonseed oil, require a long and slow crystallization while others, like partially hydrogenated soybean oil, allow a much faster crystallization. The efficiency of dry fractionation is determined by both the crystallization technique and the conditions of separation. Most dry fractionation operations now utilize a membrane filler press that operates at a pressure of 5 to 6 bar; however, some membrane filters can operate at pressures up to 30 bar to produce specialty products. Depending on their firmness and size, crystals can resist high mechanical stress, but high pressures tend to break down and fluidize weaker crystals produced by some oils, such as cottonseed.34 A variety of vegetable oils and animal fats are dry fractionated on an industrial scale. The best known include palm oil in Southeast Asia, hydrogenated oils in the United States, and milk fat in Europe.
540
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
12.10.3.1 Winterization Process Control Winterization and dewaxing are narrow forms of fractionation. From a technological point of view, these processes are less sophisticated than fractionation.34 Oils that solidify or cloud at temperatures above 40°F (4.4°C) must be winterized or dewaxed to qualify as a salad oil. Winterized is the term used to identify the removal of the high melting-point fraction or stearine that solidifies at low temperatures from certain vegetable oils, notably cottonseed oil and partially hydrogenated soybean oil. Soybean oil is a natural winter oil with a high resistance to clouding, but hydrogenation to improve flavor stability destroys this characteristic. After hydrogenation, soybean oil must be winterized to remove the high melting-point fractions to regain resistance to cloud at low temperatures. The process of winterization involves a partial crystallization followed by separation of the solids from the liquid portion. The liquid fraction is used for salad oils; the solid fraction or stearine can be utilized in some shortening or margarine formulations. In the winterization process, the oil is cooled to a predetermined temperature for a predetermined period of time prior to separation of the liquid from the solid fractions. In practice, several different processes are utilized to winterize edible oils. The design of the winterization process, the rate of cooling of the oil, the temperature of crystallization, and the agitation of the oil are crucial and play a significant role both in separation of solid fats as distinct crystals and in helping separate them from the liquid oil. Parameters for these conditions must be specified separately for each product for process control. Determination of the extent of the winterization of an oil is a simple but timeconsuming procedure. The universally accepted method is the cold test (AOCS Method Cc 11-53),35 that measures the ability of an oil to resist fat crystallization. It is defined as the time in hours for an oil to become cloudy at 32°F (0°C). The cold test results are obtained after the fact, thus winterized oil is usually held separately until the test results are completed. Oils that fail the test must be rewinterized; those that pass are transferred to storage until being deodorized. The other salad oil control analyses should be consistent with the starting oil analytical results, except for iodine value results. Winterized oils should experience an increase because of the hard fraction removal. Typical winterization quality standards for process control of cottonseed salad oil are shown in Table 2.6. 12.10.3.2 Dewaxing Process Control Some vegetable oils, including sunflower, corn, and canola oils, contain waxes from the seed shell, which can produce a cloudy appearance. Waxes are high melting-point esters of fatty alcohols and fatty acids with low solubility in oils. The quantity of wax in oil varies from a few hundred parts per million to over 2000 ppm. To provide an oil with adequate cold temperature clarity, the wax content must be reduced below 10 ppm. A traditional dewaxing process, normally performed after prebleaching, consists of slowly cooling the oil under controlled conditions to crystallize the wax, which
Quality Management
541
Table 12.6 Winterization Process Control Specification: Cottonseed Salad Oil Composition Refined and Bleached Cottonseed Oil Cottonseed Salad Oil Quality Standards Lovibond red color, max Free fatty acid, % max
Spec No
Percent
0061
100.0
0301
100.0
To
From
As Winterized
Chill Tanks
Filter
and Filtered
3.5
X
3.5
0.1
X
0.1
none
none
none
Moisture, % max
0.1
0.1
0.1
Peroxide value, meq/kg max
2.0
X
4.0
Filterable impurities, max
Cold test, hours min Iodine value
X
10.0
10.0
109 ± 3.0
110 ± 3.0
110 ± 3.0
Notes: m ax = maximum; meq/kg = milliequivalents per kilogram; min = minimum; X = do not analyze.
is then removed by filtration. Another process utilizes a wetting agent and centrifuges. An aqueous solution containing a wetting agent is metered into the oil stream, which is cooled in a heat exchanger before entering the crystallizers. The aqueous solution is then centrifuged out of the oil, carrying the waxes with it. This aqueous/ wax mixture is then passed through a heat exchanger and recentrifuged to recover the wetting agent from the waxes. These and other dewaxing processes are used to process oils containing waxes to prevent clouding on the grocery store shelf. Two laboratory evaluations are utilized to determine if an oil has been properly dewaxed: cold test and chill test. Cold test evaluations should conform to AOCS Method Cc 11-53.35 Some oils can have adequate cold test results, but still develop a slight cloud or wisp of a cloud at room temperature. The cloud or wisp can be detected with a chill test, which is performed by drying a portion of the oil sample by heating it to 266°F (130°C), allowing it to cool to room temperature, and filling a 4-ounce bottle with it. A second 4-ounce bottle should be filled with a portion of the sample that has not been heated. After 24 hours at 70°F (21.1°C), the samples are examined for cloudiness. A cloud or wisp in the heated sample, probably at the bottom of the bottle, indicates that the oil has not been dewaxed properly. Cloudiness in the unheated sample indicates a moisture cloud. Cloudiness in both samples indicates a need to retest to ensure that the heated sample has been properly dried. Removal of waxes from the oils does not change the physical characteristics of the oil. The iodine value for the starting oil and the dewaxed oil should be the same. Also, the quality type of analytical results should not change appreciably either. A change in these results should initiate an investigation to determine the cause and the corrective actions necessary with as much concern as a low chill test or cold test result generates. Typical dewaxed quality standards for process control of corn salad oil are presented in Table 12.7.
542
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 12.7 Dewaxing Process Control Specification: Corn Salad Oil Composition
Spec No
Percent
Refined and Bleached Corn Oil
0064
100.0
Dewaxed Corn Oil
0304
100.0
To
From
As Dewaxed
Chill Tanks
Filter
and Filtered
Lovibond red color, max
5.0
5.0
5.0
Free fatty acid, max
0.1
X
0.1
Quality Standards
Moisture, % max Filterable impurities, max Iodine value
0.1
0.1
0.1
none
none
none 124.0 ± 4.0
124.0 ± 4.0
X
Chill test, hours min
X
24
24
Cold test, hours min
X
5½
5½
Notes: X = do not analyze; max = maximum; min = minimum.
12.11 POSTBLEACH PROCESS CONTROL A separate bleaching operation, immediately following the modification processes, has three general purposes: (1) insurance that all traces hydrogenation catalyst, interesterification soaps, metal contaminates concentrated in stearin fractions and other prooxidants have been captured; (2) to remove undesirable colors that have been developed or accentuated during the modification process; and (3) to remove peroxides and secondary oxidation products. Postbleach systems can be exact duplicates of the prebleach process. However, batch systems are usually preferred over continuous systems and this bleaching process generally employs a bleaching earth and a metal chelating acid, in the case of hydrogenated oils, to reduce the residual nickel content to the lowest possible level. As much as 50-ppm nickel, mostly in colloidal form, can remain in hydrogenated oils after the black press filtration. Trace amounts of nickel remaining in the oil adversely affect the stability of the oil by accelerating the oxidation process. After postbleaching, the trace metal levels in the oils should be reduced to <0.1-ppm nickel and <0.02-ppm copper for oxidative stability. Oils interesterified with chemical catalyst have traces of soap and a reddish brown color remaining after water washing as well as secondary oxidation products, which must be removed by bleaching.20 Green colors can emerge in the hydrogenated oils because of the heat bleaching of yellow and red masking pigments during hydrogenation. In the course of hydrogenation, the carotenoid pigments can be reduced to a colorless form while the chlorophyllic pigments merely have their absorption maxima shifted from 660 to 640 µm. After the removal of the masking reddish pigments, the greenish pigments predominate, resulting in oils that appear green. The green pigments can be removed by adsorption on acid-activated clays with some difficulty, depending on the severity. Green colors are more easily removed in the prebleach process before heating
Quality Management
543
has set the color during hydrogenation. If heat bleaching of red color is experienced during hydrogenation, a color decrease during deodorization should not be expected. Heat bleached oil must be bleached to a color below the color limit of the finished product, taking into consideration additives that may increase color results, such as emulsifiers, lecithin, etc. On startup, the oil should be recirculated through the filter until the specified peroxide value, Lovibond red color, and a clean filterable impurities test are achieved. Qualitative nickel should also be determined if a positive result was determined after the catalyst filter. These analyses should be repeated hourly during filtering to ensure that a filtration problem has not developed and that the oil quality is consistent. Every batch of postbleached oil should be analyzed for Lovibond color, peroxide value, filterable impurities, moisture, FFA, and consistency control to verify that contamination has not occurred. The results for the finished batch of postbleached basestock should be consistent with the bleaching-in-process results and the hydrogenation consistency controls. One exception is that levels of FFA should be 0.1 to 0.2% higher than the hydrogenated oil results. Citric or phosphoric acid added to the oil before postbleaching to chelate any traces of nickel remaining after catalyst filtration elevates FFA. Consistency evaluations to determine contamination must include the most of the same analyses performed on the hydrogenated oil after the endpoint was attained — refractive index, iodine value, Mettler dropping point, or quick titer. Contamination is indicated by a change in the consistency evaluations outside the recognized method variations. Typical postbleach quality standards for process control for the same soybean oil basestock illustrated for the hydrogenation process are presented in Table 12.8. Table 12.8 Postbleach Process Control Specification: H-SBO Basestock Spec No.
Percent
Hydrogenated Soybean Oil
Composition
0632
100.0
Post Bleached Hydrogenated Soybean Oil
6632
100.0
From Quality Standards
To
Postbleach
As
Postbleach
Filter
Postbleached
Lovibond red color, max
3.0
1.0
1.0
Peroxide value, meq/kg
X
0.1
0.1
Filterable impurities, min
X
none
none
Moisture, % max
X
0.1
0.1
Qualitative nickel, min
X
negative
negative
0.1
X
0.12
30.0 ± 1.0
X
30.0 ± 1.0
Free fatty acid, % max Mettler melting point, °C
Notes: X = do not analyze; H = hydrogenated; SBO = soybean oil; max = maximum; min = minimum; meq/kg = milliequivalents per kilogram.
544
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
12.12 BLENDING PROCESS CONTROL Performance and other physical characteristics of shortening, margarine oil, specialty products, frying fats, and even some salad oils are finalized during the blending process. The formulation with hydrogenated basestocks and/or refined bleached oils, provided by product development, is blended to meet the analytical consistency controls. The finished product requirements determine which analytical characteristics are essential for each product. These requirements frequently include physical analyses, such as, SFI, IV, melting point, and fatty acid composition. At this point, the product assumes a final identity for traceability. Contamination with other products will be a major concern for all further transfers and processing. An accurate, timely control to identify contamination possibilities is the Mettler dropping point. A result is possible within 30 minutes or less that has a normal accuracy of ±0.7°C within most laboratories for products with dropping points above 33.0°C (91.4°F).35 Determination of the Mettler dropping point after each movement is a reliable control to ensure that contamination has not occurred. In cases where a change in the dropping point is experienced, the results many times point to the contaminating product. Determination of the Lovibond red color and the peroxide value will indicate if the basestocks have been abused in storage and require bleaching before deodorization to eliminate secondary oxidation products and to achieve the final specified color limit. Some heat bleaching during deodorization may be expected; however, the heating during hydrogenation generally destroys most unstable carotenoids in the basestocks. Table 12.9 presents typical blend process control limits for composition and quality standards for an all-purpose emulsified cake and icing shortening utilizing a soybean oil basestock illustrated previously for the hydrogenation and postbleach processes. 12.13 DEODORIZATION PROCESS CONTROL Deodorization is the last major processing step in the processing of edible fats and oils. It is responsible for removing both the undesirable flavors and odors occurring in natural fats and oils and those created by earlier processes. This process establishes the oil characteristics of bland flavor and odor that are expected by customers for salad oils, shortenings, frying fats, and other specialty performance products. Deodorization of fats and oils improves flavor and increases the oxidation stability by nearly complete removal of free fatty acid and other volatile odor and flavor materials, partial removal of tocopherols, and thermal destruction of peroxides. The thermal treatment also heat bleaches the oil by destruction of the carotenoids that are unstable at deodorization temperatures. Deodorization is primarily a high-temperature, high-vacuum, steam-distillation process. The usual deodorization process path is deaeration, heating, steam stripping, and finally cooling of the oil, all with zero exposure to air. Careful attention to all of the processing steps is necessary to produce a quality deodorized fats and oils
Quality Management
545
Table 12.9 Blending Process Control Specification: All-Purpose Shortening Composition
Spec No.
Percent
Tolerance
85 IV H-SBO
6689
90.0
±1.0
60-T CSO
6401
10.0
±1.0
All-Purpose Shortening Blend
7003
100.0
Quality Standards
As Blended
Solids fat index: 10.0°C/50°F
25.0 ± 2.5
26.7°C/70°F
18.0 ± 2.0
40.0°C/104°F
11.0 ± 1.5
Mettler dropping point, °C
49.0 ± 2.0
Iodine Value
77.0 ± 2.0
Fatty Acids, % Saturates
30.0 ± 3.0
Trans
15.0 ± 1.5
Lovibond red color, max
1.5
Filterable impurities, max
none
Peroxide value, meq/kg max
2.0
Free fatty acid, % max
0.12
Notes: IV = iodine value; H = hydrogenated; SBO = soybean oil; T = titer; CSO = cottonseed oil; max = maximum; meq/kg = milliequivalents per kilograms.
product. Deodorization cannot produce an acceptable product unless the feedstock has been properly processed and protected prior to steam distillation, which reduces free fatty acid content and eliminates offensive flavors and odors while heat bleaching the oil if the unstable carotenoids have not been eliminated previously. Deodorization will not destroy or remove secondary oxidation products, as many processors mistakenly attempt. Experience has shown that flavor and odor removal correlates well with the reduction of the free fatty acid content of an oil. A feedstock oil with 0.1% free fatty acid will be rendered odorless and bland flavored when the free fatty acid has been reduced to 0.01 to 0.03%, assuming a peroxide value of zero. The deodorization process sampling points are (1) to the deodorizer, if the blend or prebleached oil has been stored or has waited for deodorization for more than 24 hours; (2) stream samples after the deodorizer filter; (3) finished deodorizer batch analysis; (4) after the addition of additives, such as emulsifiers and antioxidants; and (5) after each 24-hour storage period. The blending process analytical analysis, with the exception of Mettler dropping point results, can be used as the “to deodorizer” requirements if the analyses are not more than 12 to 18 hours old. The dropping point analysis should be performed each time an oil is moved to ensure that no contamination has occurred. Stream samples obtained after the filter should be evaluated at short intervals, after every deodorizer charge or cycle, and during startup until the
546
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
process is in control, that is, all of the required quality analyses of flavor, color, and impurities are within limits. Thereafter, the process stream should be analyzed either hourly or every two hours, depending on operations’ confidence in the process. The finished batch (or “as deodorized”) evaluations repeat the control analysis to ensure that the process has remained in control during the entire process, and physical or consistency analyses are conducted to ensure that no changes have occurred due to contamination or isomerization. Trans fatty acids are developed during deodorization when high temperatures are employed. High-temperature deodorization will also vaporize short-chain fatty acids to depress product melting points. The consistency analyses are those that are required for the finished product, allowing for any additives that will effect changes when added. After these results are confirmed to meet the limits, the specified additives are incorporated and mixed for a minimum of 20 minutes before the product is sampled for the appropriate analyses. If a deodorized product is stored for 24 hours or more, it should be reevaluated daily for color, free fatty acid content, peroxide value, and flavor. This daily testing will indicate reversion problems. The specified limits for these requirements must be met before the product can be transferred to packaging or shipped in tank trucks or railcars. Typical deodorization process control limits for an all-purpose emulsified cake and icing shortening utilizing the blend previously illustrated are presented in Table 12.10. 12.14 BULK SHIPMENT PROCESS CONTROL High volumes of edible fats and oils are shipped in tank trucks, railcars, or bulk containers primarily to food processors. These products must be handled properly during loading and transit, as well as in the customers’ tanks, to ensure quality integrity at the time of use. Before loading, it is important that the transportation equipment be of the proper type, size, in good mechanical condition, and properly cleaned. The bulk containers should be cleaned and inspected thoroughly before loading. The tanks must be completely clean and dry. Truck outlet valves should be inspected, as well as hoses and pumps, for cleanliness and moisture and to evaluate the protection available during shipment. On tank cars, the foot valves must be operable and internal heating coils pressure-tested for leaks. All of these inspections prior to loading should be documented to help ensure that the inspections are actually performed and to record the condition of the transport at loading. All bulk shipments in tank trucks, railcars, or containers should be core or zone sampled following AOCS Method C1-47.35 The sample should be evaluated using all the necessary quality or organoleptic analyses as well as Mettler dropping point and filterable impurities. These results determine the shippability of the car, truck, or container after loading. After quality release, the tanks or containers are sealed, at all possible entry points, to protect against tampering during transit. The seals utilized should have to be destroyed to gain entry into the tank or container. A sample of the product from the car, truck, or container should be retained. The sample retention time should be for a period at least three times longer than the customer could
Quality Management
547
Table 12.10 Deodorization Process Control Specification: Cake and Icing Shortening Total Composition
Spec No
Percent
Tolerance
Percent
7003
100.0
0.0
94.1
Mono- and Diglycerides
9501
6.25a
±0.5
5.9
Deodorized Shortening
8003
Shortening Blend Additives:
Quality Standards
100.0
To
Stream
As
With
After
Deod
Sample
Deod
Additives
Storage
Lovibond red color, max
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.5
1.5
Free fatty acid, %
0.12
0.03
0.03
0.15
0.15
Peroxide value, meq/kg max
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.5
Moisture, % max
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1 bland
Flavor, min
X
bland
bland
bland
none
none
none
none
none
Mettler melting point, °C
49.0 ± 2.0
X
49.0 ± 2.0
47.0 ± 2.0
47.0 ± 2.0
Iodine Value
77.0 ± 2.0
X
77.0 ± 2.0
77.0 ± 2.0
77.0 ± 2.0 X
Filterable impurities
Solids fat index: 10.0°C/50°F
X
X
X
25.0 ± 2.5
26.7°C/70°F
X
X
X
17.0 ± 2.0
X
40.0°C/104°F
X
X
X
10.0 ± 1.5
X
Saturates
X
X
X
30.0 ± 3.0
X
Trans
X
X
X
17.0 ± 1.7
X
Alpha monoglyceride, %
X
X
X
2.8 ± 0.3
X
Fatty Acids, %
Notes: a = based on 100% as deodorized; X = do not analyze; meq/kg = millieqivalents per kilogram; max = maximum; min = minimum.
possibly have the product in storage; longer times approximating the shelf life of the customers’ products may be required in some cases. Table 12.11 presents the typical quality standards for bulk shipment release of the all-purpose emulsified cake and icing shortening that illustrated blending and deodorization process control. 12.15 PLASTICIZED SHORTENING PACKAGING PROCESS CONTROL The physical form of shortenings is important for proper handling and performance in prepared food products. Many food applications depend on the physical properties peculiar to each packaged product, such as softness, firmness, oiliness, creaming properties, melting behavior, surface activity, workability, solubility, aeration potential, pourability, and others. For plastic shortenings, consistency is
548
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 12.11 Bulk Shipment Process Control Specification: Cake and Icing Shortening Composition
Spec No
Percent
Tolerance
Cake and Icing Shortening
8003
100.0
± 0.0
Bulk Shipment
9005
Quality Standards Lovibond red color, max Free fatty acid, % max
100.0 As Loaded 1.5 0.15
Peroxide value, meq/kg max
0.5
Moisture, % max
0.05
Flavor, min
bland
Filterable impurities
none
Mettler melting point, °C
47.0 ± 2.0
Alpha monoglycerides, %
2.8 ± 0.3
Iodine Value
77.0 ± 2.0
Notes: m ax = maximum; meq/kg = millieqivalents per kilogram; min = minimum.
important from the standpoint of usage and performance in bakery and related products. For liquid shortenings, consistency is important for handling characteristics, and adequate suspension of the additives is necessary for proper performance.36 Shortening consistency is controlled by two dominating factors: (1) composition of the fat blend, and (2) processing conditions used to crystallize, package, and temper the products. Experience has shown a definite correlation between the physical characteristics of the product blend and the consistency of the packaged shortening, thus it is important to develop and specify crystallization conditions for each product for uniform functionality. The plasticization conditions that affect consistency include: • Precooler temperature: The heated shortening product is cooled to just above the melting point, 10 to 15°F (5.6 to 8.3°C), to reduce the heat load on the chilling unit that provides the maximum cooling capacity. Precrystallization due to cooling below the crystallization point must be avoided at this point. • Creaming gas: Nitrogen is injected into the inlet side of the chiller in precisely controlled quantities, normally 13.0 (±1.0) by volume for standard plasticized shortenings, to provide a white creamy appearance and increase the workability of the shortening. • Chiller-unit pressure: A pressure-control value should maintain a constant pressure of approximately 23.3 to 25 bar (350 to 375 psig) at the discharge of the pump to the precooler. Pressure requirements will vary with equipment design. • Chiller-unit outlet temperature: The finished shortening consistency becomes softer as the temperature is decreased, whereas firmer and more brittle shortenings develop with higher temperatures. The outlet temperature tolerance of the chilling unit should be controlled to ±1.0°F, if possible, and no higher than ±2.0°F. • Chiller throughput: The product flow rate can be adjusted to control outlet temperature, but should be within the design limits of the equipment.
Quality Management
549
• Worker-unit pressure: An internal pressure of 20 bar (300 psig) minimum on both the worker unit and the chilling unit should be maintained by an extrusion value after the worker unit. This pressure ensures thorough air dispersion while breaking up the crystal aggregates. • Worker exit temperature: A temperature rise of 10 to 15°F (5.6 to 8.3°C) from the worker unit should be expected; heat of crystallization dissipation is the cause of the temperature rise. • Filler pressure: Extrusion values are utilized at the filler in most systems to deliver a homogeneous, smooth product. The usual operating pressure for most fillers is 20 to 26.7 bar (300 to 400 psig). • Tempering temperature: The primary purpose of tempering is to condition the solidified shortening so it can withstand wide temperature variations during subsequent storage and still have a uniform consistency when brought back to room temperature (70 to 75°F or 21.1 to 23.9°C). In practice, holding at 85°F (29.4°C) for 24 to 72 hours or until a stable crystal form is reached is typical. • Storage temperature: The usual shortening storage temperature is 70°F (±2°F) unless the customer has other specific requirements.
Shortening packaging process control points are (1) on the way to chilling, (2) first and last piece line samples, and (3) after tempering. The initial packaged product control evaluations, or the “to chilling” sample, are performed to substantiate that contamination has not occurred during the transfer from the deodorizer and that the product has not been heat abused to affect color or flavor. Mettler dropping point or another physical characteristics analysis, such as IV, SFI, or even fatty acid composition could be utilized for this control, but the dropping point result has the advantage of a short elapsed time to perform and good reproducibility. The analyses determining quality acceptability are color, free fatty acid, peroxide value, flavor, moisture, and impurities. Specific limits should always be specified for each analysis, but changes from the previous results before movement should also be evaluated. Substantial changes, even if the results are still within the specified limits, should be cause for concern. Evaluation of changes can uncover problems that could develop into substantial problems after packaging. First and last piece line samples are evaluated to identify potential contamination at startup and during the packaging operation to detect any deleterious effects on the product by the chilling, working, or filling processes. The usual analyses used to provide these controls are the same as for the “to chiller” sample, with special attention being paid to any changes in results. Potential problems at this point could result of co-mingling with the previous product packaged or impurities from the transfer lines, the equipment, additives, creaming gas incorporation, packaging materials, or the atmosphere. Additionally, all shortening products should be screened for impurities after chilling and pass effective metal detection after packaging. The final packaging product controls are performed after tempering for evaluation of the product characteristics the customer will experience. Product consistency changes are not complete when the product is packaged; the crystallization process continues even after tempering and shipping, but at a substantially reduced rate. Consistency evaluations, such as penetrations, appearance, and texture ratings, as
550
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
well as performance evaluations, such as the cake and icing tests for the products that are illustrated in Table 12.12, should not be relied on until after the tempering process; evaluation prior to this point would not be representative of the product as received or used by the customer. Table 12.12 presents the typical quality standards for packaging process control of the all-purpose emulsified shortening, previously illustrated at the blend and deodorization process stages (Table 12.9 and Table 12.10), with color and flavor added at packaging. 12.16 LIQUID SHORTENING PACKAGING PROCESS CONTROL Liquid opaque shortenings have been developed for food products where fluidity at room temperature and below is important. The major uses for these products include deep-fat frying, pan and grill frying, bread, cake, and nondairy applications. Liquid shortenings are flowable suspensions of solid fat in liquid oil. The viscosity and suspension stability are controlled by two basic factors: (1) composition of the shortening, and (2) crystallization technique utilized. Hardfats with a low iodine value and β-crystal habit are used to seed the crystallization. The hardfat level can vary from as low as 1.0% to higher levels, as required, to produce the desired finished product viscosity. Equally important for liquid shortening fluid stability are the processing conditions. These conditions must be conducive to the production of stable β-crystals in a concentration where the viscosity is low enough to provide easy pumping, but high enough to prolong suspension stability. Additives contribute heavily to functionality in almost all liquid shortenings. The major additives utilized are (1) antifoaming agents for frying applications; (2) emulsifiers for bread, cake, and nondairy applications; (3) color and flavor, where these characteristics are desired; and (4) lecithin for flow properties in cakes and antisticking properties for pan and grill applications. Liquid shortening crystallization, tempering, and packaging control points are (1) to crystallization, (2) as crystallized, (3) after additives, (4) line samples, and (5) as packaged. Initially, samples are drawn from the storage or supply vessel to determine whether or not contamination has occurred during the transfer from the deodorizer and that the quality or organoleptic characteristics have not been abused to adversely affect flavor and stability. The analysis most likely used to ensure that contamination has not occurred would be iodine value. Mettler dropping point analysis could be utilized by keeping the Mettler furnace in a freezer at –20.0°C (±2.0°C) (–4.0°F (±3.6°F)) to facilitate the analysis of relatively low melting points. The quality analyses are those normally evaluated for all deodorized oils: Lovibond red color, free fatty acid, moisture, impurities, and flavor. A control limit should be assigned for each analytical evaluation, but any significant change from the previous evaluations should be investigated for cause. The deaeration procedure will probably be performed in the same vessel as the supply tank for crystallization. One of the most destructive agents for liquid shortening suspension stability and viscosity is air. The deaeration process is simply heating without agitation to eliminate any air incorporated after deodorization. Evaluation of the air content in the oil should be
Quality Management
551
Table 12.12 Plasticization Process Control Specification: Cake and Icing Shortening Total Composition
Spec No
Percent
Tolerance
Percent
8003
100.000
± 0.0
99.975
22% Beta-carotene
1681
0.009
± 0.0
0.009
Flavor
1563
0.016
± 0.0
0.016
As Packaged
9003
Cake and Icing Shortening Additives:
Quality Standards
100.000
From
After
Line
As
Supply
Additives
Samples
Packed
Lovibond red color, max
1.5
X
X
X
Free fatty acid, %
0.15
0.17
0.17
0.17
Peroxide value, meq/kg max
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Moisture, % max
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
bland
buttery
buttery
buttery
Filterable impurities, min
none
none
none
none
Mettler dropping point, °C
47.0 ± 2.0
X
47.0 ± 2.0
47.0 ± 2.0
Flavor, min
Alpha monoglyceride, %
2.8 ± 0.3
X
X
2.8 ± 0.3
Iodine Value
77.0 ± 2.0
X
77.0 ± 2.0
77.0 ± 2.0
Color standard, min
X
match
match
match
80°F ASTM penetration, mm/10
X
X
X
150 ± 30
Appearance rating, min
X
X
X
8
Texture rating, min
X
X
X
8
140% sugar cake, rate min
X
X
X
8
Icing volume, Sp/Gr min
X
X
X
0.80
Plasticization and Packaging Conditions
57 ± 2
Pre-cooler product temperature, °F
13.0 ± 2.0
Creaming gas, % nitrogen
23.3 ± 1.7
Chilling unit pressure, bar
70 ± 1
Chilling unit through-put, lb/hr
33000 ± 300
Worker unit outlet temperature, °F
85 ± 1
Worker unit pressure, bar
25 ± 1.7
Tempering temperature, °F
85 ± 2
Tempering time, hours
48 ± 8
Storage temperature, °F
70 ± 2
Notes: X = do not analyze; max = maximum; meq/kg = millieqivalents per kilogram; min = minimum; Sp/Gr = specific Gravity; mm/10 = 0.1 millimeter.
552
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
determined at each control point by obtaining the density of the product and comparing it with the density of the product without air (i.e., laboratory deaerated). After the product has been crystallized and tempered to stabilize the crystal, it should be sampled for quality analysis, air content, and either iodine value or Mettler dropping point to determine if contamination has occurred. After crystallization, additives, such as antifoamer, color, flavor, or lecithin, are incorporated, if required. If an antifoamer (methyl silicone) is the only additive, identification analysis cannot be performed on a timely basis, and actual weighing of the material and mechanical slurring to disperse the material must be relied on for control; however, a tracer can be employed by dispersing the antifoamer in an antioxidant mixture that can be analyzed on a timely basis. Color, flavor, and lecithin additions at this point can also be measured with analytical controls. During packaging, line samples should be evaluated for air content and other control analyses performed to confirm that abuse or contamination has not occurred. The “as packed” analyses are after-the-fact evaluations to confirm that the liquid shortening has the proper viscosity and/or pourability after crystal stabilization, that the quality characteristics have not been abused, and that the product meets all of the customer’s identified or required parameters. Table 12.13 presents process control specified limits for potential liquid frying shortening crystallization and packaging. 12.17 LIQUID OILS PACKAGING PROCESS CONTROL Cooking oils are suitable for all types of cooking and for some baked products where lubrication is the performance characteristics required. In addition to kitchen uses, cooking oils are used for frying snack foods and other products with a short shelf life. Salad oils are required for emulsion stability of mayonnaise and salad dressings. High-stability liquid oils are specialty products used where room-temperature liquidity and flavor stability are important functional characteristics. There are significant differences among the liquid oils. The practical definition of a salad oil is that it remains substantially liquid at refrigerator temperatures, 40°F (4.4°C). The standard method for evaluation of a salad oil is the cold test (AOCS Method Cc 11-53), which measures the resistance to crystallization of a sample immersed in an ice bath at 32°F (0°C).35 If it remains clear after five and a half hours, it meets the criteria of a salad oil. A natural salad oil or a well-winterized oil will remain clear for periods longer than five and a half hours, usually 10 to 15 hours minimum. A practical definition for a cooking oil is that it is normally clear at room temperature, but will cloud or solidify at refrigerator temperatures. Cooking oils can be used either in their natural state or after processing, depending on the source oil, local taste, custom, etc. Some of the source oils utilized as cooking oils are cottonseed, peanut, corn, sunflower, and olive oils. These oils will become semisolid or at least cloud at refrigerator temperatures unless winterized, dewaxed, or fractionated; however, it is somewhat impractical to remove the solid fractions from peanut and olive oils. Both these oils have distinctive flavors that are preferred by many consumers over the bland flavors of most processed oils. Peanut oil is utilized both
Quality Management
553
Table 12.13 Packaging Process Control Specification: Liquid Frying Shortening Total Composition
Spec No
Percent
Tolerance
Percent
8875
100.00000
± 0.0
99.98750
1527
0.01250
± 0.00
0.01249
Methyl Silicone
1601
0.00001
± 0.00
As Packaged
9875
Liquid Shortening Additives: TBHQ antioxidant Mix
Crystallization Quality Standards
To
Lovibond red color, max Free fatty acid, % max
0.00001 100.00000
As
After
Line
As
Additives
Samples
Packed
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.05
Peroxide value, meq/kg max
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Moisture, % max
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
Filterable impurities, max
none
none
none
none
none
Flavor, min
bland
bland
bland
bland
bland
28.0 ± 1.0
28.0 ± 1.0
28.0 ± 1.0
28.0 ± 1.0
28.0 ± 1.0
none
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Qualitative TBHQ, min
X
X
positive
positive
positive
85°F viscosity, min
X
500
500
500
X
70°F viscosity, max
X
X
X
X
6000
107.0 ± 2.0
X
107.0 ± 2.0
X
107.0 ± 2.0
Mettler dropping point, °C Air content, % max
Iodine value Fatty Acids, % Saturated
16.5 ± 2.0
X
X
X
16.5 ± 2.0
Trans
14.6 ± 1.5
X
X
X
14.6 ± 1.5
Crystallization Conditions: Pre-cooler temperature, °F Creaming gas, % Chiller unit temperature, °F Chiller unit pressure, bar Through-put, lbs/hr
100 ± 2 none 70 ± 1 23.3 ± 1.7 33000 ± 300
Worker unit outlet temperature, °F
80 ± 2
Worker unit pressure, bar min
20
Crystallization vessel: Temperature, °F Agitation time, hours Storage temperature, °F
85 ± 2 2±1 70 ± 2
Notes: X = do not analyze; lbs/hr = pounds per hour; max = maximum; min = minimum; meq/kg = milliequivalents per kilogram.
554
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
deodorized and undeodorized, whereas olive oil is rarely processed past extraction and filtration. Liquid oils for household use are normally packaged in clear plastic bottles ranging in size from 16 ounces to 1 gallon; 1- and 5-gallon plastic containers plus 55-gallon closed-head metal drums are the usual packages utilized for foodservice and food processor users. A typical filling operation involves the following steps for household, foodservice, and food processor packaging:
1. Transfer the oil from the process department to the oil-filling department supply vessel. 2. Pump the oil through a heat exchanger to the appropriate filler. 3. Feed containers to the filler and fill with oil to the specified weight. 4. Cap and label the containers prior to packaging in corrugated cases. 5. The case is sealed, labeled, and printed with traceability information. 6. Expose the filled plastic containers to metal detection before transferring to storage or shipment. Metal drums must be inspected before filling through the two openings in the top with a light for foreign material, such as rust, moisture, insects, or dirt.
The process control points for liquid oil filling systems are (1) supply tank, (2) line samples, and (3) as packaged. Initially, samples are obtained from the supply tank prior to the start of the filling process. Analysis of this sample is conducted to confirm that the liquid oil product has not been contaminated or the flavor degraded during transfer or from the previous product in the supply tank. Line samples, normally obtained at startup and near the batch completion, are evaluated for product changes caused by the packaging operation or some other problem, such as a mispumping into the supply tank, addition of an additive to the wrong product, a leaking tank coil, product filtration problems, and others. The “as packed” sample is a final evaluation of the product to reconfirm the previous samples and determine any customer-specific analytical results not previously performed. The process control quality limits for a typical cottonseed salad oil are presented in Table 12.14. 12.18 SHORTENING FLAKE PROCESS CONTROL STANDARDS Fat or shortening flakes are higher melting edible oil products solidified into a thin flake form for ease in handling, for remelting, or for a specific function in a food product. Chill rolls are utilized to produce both low-iodine-value hardfat flakes and slightly lower melting point specialty-use products. Solidification of the flake products is accomplished when the roll picks up a coating of melted product from a supply trough, which solidifies rapidly and is removed by a scraper blade. Hardfat flake products are normally packaged in 50-pound Kraft bags and the specialty products in fiberboard cases, often sized for an individual food processor’s batch requirements. The following processing sequence illustrates a typical chill-roll operation to produce and package flakes:
Quality Management
555
Table 12.14 Oil Filling Process Control Specification: Cottonseed Salad Oil Composition Cottonseed Salad Oil As Packaged Quality Standards
Spec No
Percent
Tolerance
8301
100.00
± 0.00
9301
100.00
Supply
Line
As
Tank
Sample
Packed
Lovibond red color, max
3.5
3.5
3.5
Free fatty acid, % max
0.05
0.05
0.05
Peroxide value, meq/kg max
0.5
0.5
0.5
Moisture, % max
0.05
0.05
0.05
Filterable impurities, max
none
none
none
Flavor, min
bland
bland
bland
Cold test, hours min
15.0
X
15.0
110.0 ± 3.0
X
110.0 ± 3.0
X
X
15.0
negative
X
negative
25.0 ± 2.0
X
25.0 ± 2.0
1.0 ± 1.0
X
1.0 ± 1.0
Iodine value AOM stability, hours min Qualitative TBHQ Fatty Acids, % Saturated Trans Filling Conditions: Oil temperature, °F
70 ± 5
Notes: X = do not analyze; max = maximum; meq/kg = milliequivalents per kilogram; min = minimum.
1. Transfer the deodorized flake oil product from the process department to a chill-roll supply tank. 2. Add and disperse any additive required by the finished flake product profile. 3. Adjust the product temperature with a heat exchanger and filter inline to the chill roll feed trough. 4. A thin coating of product is picked up by the rotating chill roll from the feed trough. 5. The solidified product is scraped off the roll after one revolution. 6. The flakes are packaged, labeled, identified for traceability and transferred through a metal detector before controlled temperature storage to dissipate the heat of crystallization before shipment.
The process control points for the flaking operation are (1) supply tank, (2) after addition of any additives, (3) as flaked, and (4) as shipped. Initially, as with any transferred product, a sample obtained from the supply tank is analyzed for assurance that the product has not been contaminated or abused during or after the transfer from the previous department. Sampling after any additives have been dispersed in the product determines whether or not the desired change has been achieved. In some
556
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 12.15 Flaking Process Control Specification: Soybean Oil Flakes Composition
Spec No
Percent
Tolerance
8421
100.0
± 0.0
Soybean Oil Hardfat As Flaked
9421
100.0
Supply
As
As
Tank
Flaked
Shipped
1.5
1.5
1.5
Quality Standards Lovibond red color, max Free fatty acid, % max
0.05
0.05
0.1
Peroxide value, meq/kg max
0.5
0.5
0.5
Moisture, % max
0.05
0.2
0.2
Filterable impurities, min
none
none
none
Iodine value, max
5.0
5.0
5.0
X
dry
dry
Flake condition Flaking Conditions: Feed tank temperature, °F
160 ± 5
Oil-to-roll temperature, °F
200 ± 10
Chill roll inlet coolant temperature, °F Chill roll speed, rpm Oil trough level Flake in-package temperature, °F Flake crystallization temperature rise, °F
80 max Set for dry flake ½ to ¾ 110 max 28° max after 1 hour
Notes: m ax = maximum; meq/kg = milliequivalents per kilogram; min = minimum; X = do not analyze; rpm = revolutions per minute.
cases, especially for colorants, adjustments may be required to achieve the desired appearance. “As flaked” sampling can indicate any abuse to the product during processing because of moisture, impurities, heat, or metals that can cause an off-flavor or off-color. The “as shipped” sample confirms the “as packed” sample and detects any changes in color caused by crystallization or free fatty acids due to hydrolysis. The quality control limits for process control of a low-iodine-value soybean oil hardfat are presented in Table 12.15. 12.19 MARGARINE AND SPREAD PROCESS CONTROL STANDARDS Consumer margarines and spreads are used primarily for table spreads and cooking. Industrial margarines are utilized for many different specialized products, such as Danish pastry, cake icings, puff pastry, and others. Two standards of identity regulate U.S. margarine production. Vegetable oil margarines are regulated by the FDA, and animal fat or animal/vegetable margarines are subject to USDA regulations. The
Quality Management
557
margarine standards require 80% fat minimum, specify usage of only safe and suitable ingredients, allow one or more listed optional ingredients, and require not less than 15,000 international units per pound of vitamin A. Products with less than 80% fat and resembling margarine must be referred to as a spread unless the requirements for low fat margarine product are satisfied.37,38 Margarine and spread processing consists of the following basic operations for a batch system:
1. The margarine or spread oil bases are blended and processed to meet the product specification requirements. The physical properties of the oil base contribute heavily to the eating characteristics, consistency, and plasticity of each product. 2. Liquid milk or whey, when used, is usually prepared by reconstituting dry milk or whey solids, which are then pasteurized, cooled, and held in sanitary tanks until use. 3. The water-soluble ingredients are weighed or metered into a sanitary tank and mixed thoroughly. 4. The oil-soluble ingredients are metered or weighed into a sanitary tank and mixed thoroughly. 5. The oil and water mixtures are brought together to form an emulsion. 6. The emulsion is quick-chilled with a swept-surface heat exchanger. Stick margarines and others for which a firm narrow plastic range is desired are allowed to solidify without agitation (that is, no working unit). 7. Tub spreads, margarines, and other products where spreadability or plasticity is desired utilize a working unit similar to those used for shortening processing. 8. Margarine or spread products are packaged and transferred to refrigerated storage in most cases, but some industrial margarines or spreads require holding at a specific temperature to stabilize the fat crystal.
The batch process sampling points for margarine and spread operations are (1) margarine oil supply tank, (2) product emulsion, (3) line samples, and (4) as packed. It is not necessary to reanalyze the margarine oil supply tank for each emulsion; however, it should be sampled before the initial use in emulsions. Each emulsion should be evaluated for moisture level as a timely indicator that allows correction, if required, of the composition. The proper moisture level indicates that fat, salt, and curd levels are also at the desired concentrations. Line sample evaluations confirm that the color and flavor levels meet the specified limits and should verify the emulsion sample results for composition. Portions of the line samples should be composited for a shift analysis of the moisture, fat, salt, and curd contents. “As packed” samples, preferably obtained shortly after startup and near completion of each packaging shift, should be reevaluated for appearance, flavor, penetrations, and consistency after 24 hours to allow the fat crystal to stabilize. The flavor of this sample will be notably different from the samples flavored during packaging because of crystallization of the fat portion, which somewhat masks the flavor and salt perception. Portions of the “as packed” samples must also be evaluated for microorganisms. Typical table-grade margarine emulsion, crystallization, packaging, and storage process control specifications are presented in Table 12.16.
558
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Table 12.16 Margarine Process Control Specification: Tablegrade Margarine Composition
Spec No
Percent
Pasteurized milk Potable water Granulated sugar Sorbic acid
9203 1000 1701 1501
4.417 13.312 2.000 0.050
Margarine oil Lecithin Mono- and diglycerides Flavor
8102 1309 9507 1436
79.600 0.200 0.400 0.015
Vitamin A/carotene mix
1575
0.006
As Packaged Quality Standards Free fatty acid, % max Peroxide value, meq/kg Flavor, min Mettler dropping point, °C Fatty Acids, % Saturated Trans Moisture, % max Fat, % Salt, % Curd, % Appearance rating, min 50°F penetration, mm/10 Standard plate count/g, max Yeast and mold/g, max Coliforms/g, max
9230 Oil Supply
100.000
Emulsion
Line Samples
As Packed
0.05 0.5 bland 36.0 ± 1.0
X X X X
X X salty & buttery X
X X buttery X
23.5 ± 2.0 24.5 ± 1.5 0.05 X X X X X X X X
X X 17.0 ± 0.3 X X X X X X X X
X X 17.0 ± 0.3 80.2 ± 0.2 2.0 ± 0.1 0.4 ± 0.1 X X X X X
X X 17.0 ± 0.3 80.2 ± .02 2.0 ± 0.1 0.4 ± 0.1 8 50 ± 15 10,000 100 10
Processing Conditions: Potable water temperature, °F Pasteurized milk temperature, °F Margarine oil temperature, °F Emulsion temperature, °F Scraped wall heat exchanger exit temperature, °F Worker unit Creaming gas, % nitrogen Tempering temperature, °F Tempering time, hours Storage temperature, °F Shipping temperature, °F Note: X = do not analyze.
45 ± 5 45 ± 5 130 ± 5 105 ± 5 47 ± 1 none none 45 ± 5 24 min 45 ± 5 45 ± 5
Quality Management
559
REFERENCES
1. Bicking, C.A. and Bingham, R.S. Jr., Quality control in the chemical process industries, in Quality Control Handbook, 2nd ed., Juran, J.M., Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962, p. 23–3. 2. Wintermantel, J., Ingredients specification writing, Cereal Foods World, 27, 65, 1982. 3. Wintermantel, J., Ingredients specification writing, part III, Cereal Foods World, 27, 235, 1982. 4. Leo, D.A., Packaging of fats and oils, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 3, Applewhite, T.J., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1985, pp. 311–312. 5. Juran, J.M., The economics of quality, in Quality Control Handbook, 2nd ed., Juran, J.M., Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962, pp. 1–30, 1–46. 6. Dutton, H.J., Analysis of fats and oils, JAOCS, 55, 806, 1978. 7. Flider, F.J. and Orthoefer, F.T., Metals in soybean oil, JAOCS, 58, 271, 1981. 8. Wiedermann, L.H., Degumming, refining and bleaching soybean oil, JAOCS, 58, 159–160, 1981. 9. Carr, R.A., Refining and degumming systems for edible fats and oils, JAOCS, 55, 765–771, 1978. 10. Roden, A. and Ullyot, G., Quality control in edible oil processing, JAOCS, 61, 1109– 1110, 1984. 11. Latondress, E.G., Refining, bleaching and hydrogenating meat fats, JAOCS, 62, 812, 1985. 12. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2005 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, Part D: Science Base, Section 4: Fats, p. 14. 13. O’Brien, R.D., and Wakelyn, P.J., Cottonseed oil: An oil for trans-free options, INFORM, 16, 677–679, 2005. 14. Haumann, B.F., Food labeling, INFORM, 4, 562, 1993. 15. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Volume 2, Section 110, Current good manufacturing practice in manufacturing, packing, or holding human food, Revised 2006. 16. Watkins, C., Trans symposium a rousing success, INFORM, 15, 229, 2004. 17. Kellens, M. and De Greyt, W., Deodorization, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E. and Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, p. 243. 18. Puri, P.S., Hydrogenation of oils and fats, JAOCS, 57, 852A, 1980. 19. O’Brien, R.D., Formulation: single feedstock situation, in Hydrogenation: Proceedings of an AOCS Colloquium, Hastert, R., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1987, p.156. 20. Brinkmann, B., Interesterification as a tool to improve the nutritional value of fat blends for various applications, in Procedings of the World Conference on Oilseed Processing and Utilization, Wilson, R.F., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2001, pp. 31–33. 21. Petrauskaite, V., et al., Physical and chemical properties of trans-free fats produced by chemical interesterification of vegetable oil blends, JAOCS, 75, 490, 1998. 22. Wainwright, B., Speciality fats and oils, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E., and Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, p. 51. 23. Rozendaal, A., Interesterification of fats and oils, in Edible Fats and Oils Processing: Basic Principals and Modern Practices: World Conference Proceedings, Erickson, D.R., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, p.156, 1990.
560
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
24. Hustedt, H.H., Interesterification of edible oils, JAOCS, 53, 390, 1976. 25. Laning, S.J., Chemical interesterification of palm, palm, kernel and coconut oils, JAOCS, 62, 403, 1985. 26. Liu, L. and Lampert, D., Monitoring chemical interesterification, JAOCS, 76, 786, 1999. 27. Lampert, D., Processes and products of interesterification, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, 2nd ed., O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E., and Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, p. 218. 28. Zainal, Z, and Yusoff, M.S.A., Enzymatic interesterification of palm stearin and palm kernel olein, JAOCS, 76, 1003, 1999. 29. Zainal, Z. and Yusoff, M.S.A., Enzymatic interesterification of palm stearin and palm kernel olein, JAOCS, 76, 1003–1008, 1999. 30. Balcao, V.M. et al., Modification of butterfat by selective hydrolysis and interesterification by lipase: Process and product characterization, JAOCS, 75, 1347, 1998. 31. Cerdan, L.E., et al., Synthesis of polyunsaturated fatty acid-enriched triglycerides by lipase-catalyzed esterification, JAOCS, 75, 1331, 1998. 32. Ho, K.P. and Subramaniam, M.B., Fractionation of lauric-based fatty acids achieving consistent product quality, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Lauric Oils: Sources, Processing, and Applications, Applewhite, T.H., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1994, p. 58. 33. Kreulen, H.P., Fractionation and winterization of edible oils, JAOCS, 53, 393–396, 1976. 34. Kellens, M. and Hendrix, M., Fractionation, in Introduction to Fats and Oils Technology, O’Brien, R.D., Farr, W.E., and Wan, P.J., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2000, pp. 196–205. 35. American Oil Chemists’ Society. The Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 5th ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2005. 36. Bell, R.J., Shortening and margarine products, in Introduction to Fats and Oil Technology, Wan, P.J., Eds, AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1992, pp. 187–188. 37. Chrysam, M.M., Table spreads and shortenings, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 3, Applewhite, T.H., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1985, pp. 57–60. 38. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Volume 2, Part 166, Section 110, Margarine, Revised April 1, 2006.
Chapter 13
Troubleshooting
13.1 INTRODUCTION Troubleshooting can be defined as the process used to determine why something is not performing properly and for correction of the problem. As with many practical skills, troubleshooting is an art as well as an analytical or scientific process. Troubleshooting begins when it is recognized that a problem exists and it is determined that it must be solved. A basic analytical process for solving problems is outlined in Figure 13.1. The first step is to define the problem. This is a description of the problem that includes the symptoms and any other pertinent information. The next step is to gather information about the problem. This includes questioning the involved parties for more detailed information, viewing the physical systems, analyzing the product involved, and gathering information regarding the processes involved. The third step is to narrow the scope to the process or processes causing the problem. After the problem has been narrowed down, a corrective action for the problem evolves. The next to last step is to test the identified corrective action. If it is successful, the changes necessary can be implemented on a temporary basis before making the changes permanent. If unsuccessful, the problem-solving process must revert back to an intermediate step to redefine the corrective actions required.1 Many different troubleshooting styles and methods are available. Each has advantages and disadvantages. The approach chosen is, most times, dependent on personal preference, convenience, or the problem itself. Many times more than one approach or a combination of methods will be necessary to solve the problem. Good troubleshooters always use several approaches based on the problem symptoms. Some of the approaches applicable to edible fats and oils problem solving include:
1. Experience: The most common and usually the simplest, most expedient method or approach; an experienced technician can recognize many of the problems and the corrective action necessary immediately because the same problem or something similar has happened previously. Also, if a number of solutions are possible, experience can be used to identify the best area to attack first. This selection can 561
562
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Identify Problem
Collect Data
Narrow the Problem
Apply Corrective Action
No
Problem Solved?
Yes
Implement Change and Document
Figure 13.1 Troubleshooting process.
be based on the highest probability, the most expedient, the least risky, the easiest, and so on. Experience is primarily comprised of skills learned on the job; usually, the more different job positions an individual has successfully performed, the more experience has been gained. Experience can also be gained through hands-on laboratory and classroom training, but some actual on-the-job experience is normally necessary to reinforce the training. Good process and performance records are also a form of experience that can be effectively utilized for problem solving. 2. When, what, and where: The three Ws’ troubleshooting technique is a simple question-and-answer technique. It utilizes questions similar to the following: a. What is the problem and what is not the problem? b. Where is the problem and where isn’t the problem?
Troubleshooting
563
c. When did the problem happen and when did the problem not occur? d. What has changed and what has not changed? This technique uses observation, experience, performance records, and testing to narrow down the problem to a workable size. 3. Trapping a problem: Setting a trap is often the only effective method of catching the cause of a reoccurring problem. Systems employing trending of archived data, along with possible additional monitoring points, can be used to identify the problem area and help determine the necessary corrective actions.
There are probably as many troubleshooting approaches as there are individuals solving problems. Most of these approaches encompass the techniques described, at least in part. A common thread running through all problem-solving techniques is identification of the problem and implementing corrective actions. These actions are almost always performed on a more timely basis and are easier when experience is available. The remainder of this chapter is a compilation of edible fats and oils problems with corrective actions drawn from experience for individual processes and product types. 13.2 PROCESS TROUBLESHOOTING 13.2.1 Vegetable Oil Extraction Problem: Enzyme Activity Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Temperature: The detrimental enzymes are activated at 135 to 180°F (57 to 80°C). The inactivation temperatures are 180 to 250°F (82 to 121°C). 2. Arrested lipase action: Expanders and cookers arrest lipase (phosphalipase and lipoxygenase) activities. 3. Extract split seed or beans quickly: Enzymes are activated with disrupted seeds or beans, heat, and moisture. It has been estimated that 6% of the soybeans are split with each mechanical transfer. Cracked seeds should be heat inactivated with cookers or expanders as soon as possible. 4. Dry storage: Seed pile temperatures are elevated with higher moisture levels, which encourage enzyme activity.
Problem: Oxidative Stability Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Extraction interruptions: Oxidation and hydrolysis take place rapidly after oilseed flaking because a relatively large surface area is presented to the atmosphere. Consequently, interruptions in extraction operations are likely to yield poor quality.
564
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Problem: Moldy Oil-Seed Utilization Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Aflatoxin: Moldy peanuts and other oil seeds, nuts, or fruits are routinely used as oil stock. When aflatoxic peanuts are crushed, only a small portion of the toxin is retained in the oil. Filtration of the oil lowers the aflatoxin level, and conventional refining and bleaching effectively removes any residual aflatoxin.2
Problem: Damaged Soybean Effects Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Frost damage: Immature soybean plants are killed by severe frost, which terminates development of the bean. The effects of frost damage a month prior to maturity upon soybean oil are3 a. Increased fatty acids: Free fatty acid levels as high as 2.2% have been determined with crude oil from frost damaged beans. b. Excessive refining loss: Crude oil from immature beans can increase the refining loss substantially. Studies indicated more than a threefold increase for frost-damaged beans. c. Higher green color: Crude oils from frost-damaged beans are green in color because of the presence of porphyrins, identified by sharp absorption peaks in the 640 to 680-µm range which are related to chlorophyll. The green color must be removed prior to caustic refining or in prebleaching before exposure to oxidation, which can set the color so it becomes extremely difficult to remove. At prebleach, acid-activated clays have been found more effective than the neutral clays, and higher levels must be used as the intensity of the green color increases. As a general rule, soybean oil should be bleached to a green color limit rather than a red color limit. d. Poor flavor stability: Increased bleaching requirements can decrease the flavor stability of soybean oil. Some severely frost-damaged oils have had to be declared inedible because of flavor stability and color problems. e. High saturated fatty acid content: Iodine values of oil from beans frost damaged a month before maturity have been found with over seven iodine values lower than oil from mature soybeans. 2. Field and storage damage: When soybeans are exposed to rain or damp weather in the field after maturity or are stored at high moisture levels in excess of 13 to 14%, decomposition of the oil fraction results. The effects of the decomposition are4 a. Refining loss: Increased refining losses are attributable to two factors: (1) high free fatty acid content of the crude oil, and (2) alteration and degradation of phospholipids. Prolonged moisture exposure activates a lipase within the beans that results in hydrolysis. Degraded phospholipids cannot be hydrated and act like emulsifying agents to entrain higher levels of neutral oil in the soapstock. Field- and storage-damaged soybeans have experienced oil losses in refining of over 4%, as opposed to the normal 1 to 1.5% loss associated with undamaged beans. b. Polymerization: Heat damage lowers polyunsaturated fatty acids by polymerizing linoleic and linolenic fatty acids. These effects are detrimental to the flavor and oxidative stability of deodorized oils.
Troubleshooting
565
c. Trace metals: Two- to tenfold increases in iron content have been observed in damaged soybeans from two sources: (1) iron naturally occurring in the bean, and (2) iron mainly picked up from processing equipment. Metal inactivators, usually citric or phosphoric acid, must be utilized to reduce iron to levels that do not impair flavor and oxidative stability. d. Nonhydratable phospholipids: Oils from field- and storage-damaged soybeans contain nonhydratable phospholipids that cannot be removed easily by degumming or refining and ultimately affect the initial flavor and flavor stability of the finished salad oils produced.
Problem: High-Color Cottonseed Oil Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Off-grade: Off-grade or early season crude cottonseed oil production has required a higher level of acid pretreatment to obtain a lower bleach color and reduce refining losses. The amount of acid pretreatment also depends on where the cottonseed was grown and the local seasonal conditions. Wet humid climates produce higher colored oils. Phosphoric acid is used more commonly to pretreat crude oils because of its less corrosive properties and better commercial availability. The acid pretreatment level usually varies between 100 and 500 ppm by weight of the oil, depending on the crude quality; however, some off-grade crude cottonseed oils have required pretreatment, with as much as 1800 ppm phosphoric acid.5 2. Time and temperature: Exposure of cottonseed oil to high temperatures for extended times causes permanent darkening because of oxidation of the pigment gossypol. Miscella refining immediately after extraction minimizes the effects of time and temperature on gossypol.
Problem: Immature Canola Seed Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. High chlorophyll: Immature canola or rapeseed with high chlorophyll levels can lead to a bluish green color in the oil, which is difficult to remove with refining. The maximum level for Swedish crude canola oil has been established at 3.0 red, 125 yellow on the 1.5-inch cell of the British Standard Lovibond Color Method. This corresponds to a chlorophyll level of 30 ppm. Above this level, extra processing is required to produce an oil with satisfactory flavor and stability.6
Problem: Yellow-Colored Palm Kernel Oil Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Palm oil absorption: Palm kernel oils with a yellow color and a carotene level above the norm of 4.4 ppm may be the result of absorption of palm oil by a thinner tenera shell or breakage and palm oil penetration of the kernel. Palm and palm kernel oils are both obtained from the fruit of the palm tree. The outer pulp contains palm oil, and the kernel in the fruit contains palm kernel oil. Because these
566
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
oils differ considerably in characteristics and properties, mixing causes substantial changes in performance.
13.2.2 Meat Fat Rendering Problem: Inadequate Meat Fat Rendering Controls Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Dark color: Heating or cooking too long at a high temperature during rendering scorches the protein content, which discolors the meat fat. Bleaching will probably be necessary to meet the expected color limits. 2. Flavor: Steam-rendered animal fats flavor and odor can resemble boiled meats. 3. Sour: Excessive protein and moisture allowed to remain in the rendered fat can cause souring during transit. Sour meat fats may be the major reason for U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) inspector rejections and enforced downgrading to inedible product. 4. Dissolved phospholipids: Fat darkening will result unless the phospholipids are removed by filtering or water washing. 5. High free fatty acid: The amount of free fatty acid an animal fat contains is a good indication of whether the fats were properly handled before rendering. Meat tissues contain fat-splitting enzymes, which start to hydrolyze the fat to form free fatty acid as soon as the animal dies. Rendering must be performed as soon after the animals are slaughtered as possible for a minimum of free fatty acid development. Increased processing losses will be experienced to neutralize any excess free fatty acid present. 6. Proteinaceous material: Colloidal protein will cause darkening, especially with steam distillation or deodorization. Small amounts of diatomaceous earth or bleaching clay followed by filtration can remove these materials.
Problem: Green Tallow Appearance Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. High chlorophyll content: Tallow can have a green appearance because of a high chlorophyll content resulting from feeding fodder or pasture grasses. Because tallow contains low levels of red and yellow coloration, the green color is accentuated and should be readily apparent upon receipt. Tallow chlorophyll can be removed with acid-activated clay bleaching.
13.2.3 Crude Oil Storage Problem: Free Fatty Acid Increase Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Blowing with steam during unloading: Discontinue using steam to blow lines, limit time used, or blow to a catch-all tank.
Troubleshooting
567
2. Excessive moisture in receipts: Analyze before unloading and schedule highmoisture lots to be refined quickly to minimize free fatty acid increase. 3. High storage temperature: Do not heat crude oil during storage, do repair leaking valves that allow unintentional heating, and do not allow centrifugal pumps to run against closed valves. 4. Steam coil leaks: Repair coils. 5. Tank bottoms: Agitate tanks and clean periodically to remove any sludge buildup. 6. High-pressure steam: The steam pressure used to heat oils at any stage should be limited to 0.7 bar (10 psig) which provides a steam temperature of 240°F (115.6°C), which should minimize overheating and scorching of the oils. Some facilities use only hot water to avoid contacting the oils with a temperature over 208°F (98°C).
Problem: Color Darkens during Storage Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Long storage time: Rotate usage (first in/first out). Storage time should be limed to three weeks, maximum. 2. High-temperature oil: Refine oil as soon as possible. 3. Aeration: Shut off agitators when liquid level is too low, and do not allow the oil to free-fall into the tank; fill the tanks from the bottom. 4. Carotene decomposition: Carotenes decompose with oxidation to form compounds that are difficult to remove during refining and bleaching. Crude oil studies have shown that tertiary butylhydroquinone (TBHQ) antioxidant protects carotene against decomposition. The TBHQ-protected oils require less stringent bleaching conditions and a lower bleaching clay treat to obtain the desired product characteristics.7
Problem: Cottonseed Oil Bleach Color Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Crude storage: Good-quality crude cottonseed oil can be successfully stored for five months in cool, but not cold, weather without any appreciable change in free fatty acid, color, flavor, and refining loss, but the ease of bleaching is decreased appreciably.8 Oxidation of the complex pigment system in cottonseed oil affects bleach color. Refining before extensive oxidation of the pigments occurs removes the source of the color reversion, thus it is more desirable to store cottonseed oil as refined rather than as crude.
Problem: Reduced Oxidative Stability Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Crude oil storage time: Contact with atmospheric oxygen will cause oxidative damage, which is ultimately reflected in the quality of the processed oil.
568
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Vegetable oils with the lightest colors and best oxidative stability are those processed almost immediately after extraction or immediately protected with nitrogen. 2. Antioxidant protection: Studies have shown that TBHQ antioxidant substantially increases the oxidative stability of vegetable oils and has a stabilization effect on the natural tocopherol antioxidants. The active oxygen method (AOM) stability of crude soybean oil has been doubled with the addition of 200 ppm TBHQ with a significant improvement in the tocopherol content of the deodorizer distillate.7
Problem: Excessive Tank Bottoms Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Poor or no agitation: Install properly designed agitators and agitate the oil, except when the liquid level is below the agitators. 2. Poor-quality crude oil: Analyze before unloading and refine as soon as possible to minimize settling of impurities. 3. Tank sweating: A combination of high humidity, warm oil, and cool temperatures can result in sweating inside storage tanks. This moisture dripping into the oil is an effective degumming system. The result is a buildup of unwanted solids in the bottom of the tank. Sweating can be controlled somewhat by vent systems that allow air flow into and out of each storage unit.
Problem: Commingling of Oils One of the most common problems in any tank farm is the unwanted mixing of oils by operator error, faulty equipment, or design problems.9 Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Piping: Where economically possible, separate piping systems should be provided for each major oil handled or at least for oils with critical physical properties. 2. Tank size: The use of a few large tanks rather than numerous small tanks can minimize the chances of contamination. 3. Valves: All valves should be chosen so that it is easy to recognize when they are in either the open or the closed position. 4. Flow system: Automated systems are available that will not allow pumping to begin until the correct valves are open or shut and other specific criteria are met. 5. Spill prevention: Ruptured tanks, broken lines, and human error have resulted in lost product and significant harm to the environment that could have been contained. Each storage facility must be properly diked or a drainage system constructed that will contain any conceivable spill. 6. Procedures: The secret to a good storage facility operation is good planning and adherence to basic rules and common sense. Written operating procedures provide a means of operator training and guidance, and checklists allow daily follow-up and planning.
Troubleshooting
569
Problem: Storage Tanks The number, size, and construction material of storage tanks are among the most crucial points to be considered when planning the operation of an existing or new oil processing facility. The choices depend on the quality of the oil to be stored, for example, crude oil has different requirements than intermediate or finished product oils. Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Number and size: A single oil processing facility needs larger but fewer tanks than a facility handling many different source oils. When many different oil types must be stored, a series of larger and smaller tanks is required to decrease the danger of contamination or mixing different oils. 2. Design features: The normal crude oil storage tanks have some very common design features for optimum performance: a. Cylindrical tanks are preferred over rectangular tanks, which are generally more expensive and more difficult to clean. b. Welded mild steel construction. c. A high height-to-diameter ratio for maximum protection of the stored oils from air exposure. d. The feed pipe should run from the top to the bottom, with a vent close to the top bend. e. The tank bottom should have a slope leading to a sump with a drain line for cleaning. f. The tank outlet should be about 1.5 feet (0.5 meters) above the bottom of the tank and at the side to allow sludge settling. g. Hot-water heating coils entering from the top of the tank and shaped like a vertical inverse U at one side of the tank to provide space for the melted material to expand. h. Side-entering agitation for counteracting layering in large tanks. i. Outside insulation, where necessary. j. A plastic coating or lining to protect against fatty acids, if necessary (to be determined by the source oil to be stored).
Problem: Inventory Measurement Errors Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Gauging: Six factors are involved in product weight determinations in any gauge measurement procedure; an error in any one factor will create a discrepancy:10 a. Accurate precalibration of all the tanks involved: Charts supplied for the individual tanks must be assumed to be correct; however, some sources of error exist: i. Tank bottoms may sag or buckle with varying loads of oil. The tanks should be checked periodically with weighed oil to verify calibrations. ii. Tanks heated to keep a product liquid will expand to provide a greater volume than calibration at lower temperatures. This increase in volume can be calculated from the known coefficient of expansion of steel.
570
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
iii. Irregular shapes and internal structures of the tanks may have affected calibrations to make the charts only approximate. b. Proper sampling of the oil product for analysis: The sample obtained must represent accurately the entire amount of the oil product in the tank. If moisture or solid fractions are present, these materials must be included in their proper amount by zone sampling. c. Accurate temperature measurement of the product in the tank: The number of readings needed to obtain a true average temperature may vary greatly depending on the size and depth of the tank, availability of agitation, and heating coils. The importance of temperature is illustrated by the fact that an error of 1°F will result in a weight difference of approximately 1300 pounds in a 400,000 gallon tank. d. Accurate measurement of the depth or outage: Measurements should always be made at the same marked place on the tank opening with a high-quality steel tape that is free from kinks and bends and has clear readable figures and readings to the nearest 1/16 inch. Measurements should be repeated until successive results are identical. Two problems experienced in obtaining satisfactory tape readings are oil motion from heating or agitation and entrained air causing foam. e. Accurate specific gravity analysis: Accurate specific gravity analysis of the sample is mandatory for accurate calculations. f. Accurate and proper calculations: Accurate and proper calculations should be based on the tank calibration and the data obtained. 2. Metering: Under ideal conditions of pump pressure and oil temperature, metering is possible; however, ideal conditions are rarely met, particularly for weight determinations of bulk shipments or inventories where accuracy is required. 3. Weighing: Actual weighing of the oil is the most desirable procedure. Weighing is accomplished with many different types of scales (e.g., tank, railcar, truck, and even drum scales). These scales must be calibrated frequently to ensure accuracy.
13.2.4 Degumming Problem: Dark-Color Gums Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Acid degumming: Phosphoric acid degummed soybean oil improves the refined oil yield, but provides darker gums. The darker gums produce inferior lecithin products; the lecithin produced is darker in color than lecithin from water degumming processes. However, most soybean oil gums are not processed for lecithin recovery, and the separated gums are mixed with the soapstock obtained with caustic refining.
Problem: Low Yield Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Excess water: It is important to add only the amount of water necessary to precipitate the gums, as any excess water causes unnecessary oil losses through hydrolysis. The normal water level for degumming is approximately 2.0%.
Troubleshooting
571
Problem: High Nonhydratable Phosphatide Level Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Oilseed cooking temperatures prior to extraction: Studies have shown that phosphalipase, an enzyme that makes the phospholipids nonhydratable and more difficult to remove, is highly active at 135 to 185°F (57 to 85°C). Therefore, this cooking temperature range should be avoided.11 2. Preextraction oilseed processing: Both the ALCON treatment (a moist heat treatment of flaked soybeans before extraction) and expander preextraction processing have led to a low level of nonhydratable phosphatides. Good-quality oilseeds preprocessed with either of these processes have been physically refined with results equivalent to chemical refining, even with water degumming. Poor-quality oilseeds require acid degumming to produce a physical refined quality equivalent to chemical refining.12
13.2.5 Caustic Oil Refining: Primary Centrifuge Problem: High Free Fatty Acid (Over 0.05%) Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Caustic treat too low: Check the caustic strength and correct if found low, or recheck the free fatty acid of the crude oil and recalculate the treat required. The theoretical quantity of caustic is based on the ratio of molecular weights of NaOH to oleic fatty acid. Most oils are refined with 0.10 to 0.13% excess caustic. Exceptions are the lauric oils and palm oil, which require a minimal excess of approximately 0.02%, and cottonseed oil, which is refined for color reduction and requires a higher excess of approximately 0.16%. 2. Inadequate mixing of caustic with the crude oil: Make sure that the high-speed, inline mixer and the vertical mixers are functioning properly.
Problem: High Red Color Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Low caustic treat: When a high refined color is experienced in the startup samples, reconfirm the caustic treat and increase slightly, if needed, to obtain an acceptable lab bleach color. 2. Poor-quality crude oil: The final step in most crude oil production is final solvent stripping. Temperatures in this step may reach 250°F (121°C). The longer an oil remains at the elevated temperatures, the more difficult it is to remove the color bodies in caustic refining. This treatment can cause color fixation. An increase in caustic treat may be necessary to obtain an acceptable refined and lab bleach color. 3. Insufficient mixing: Confirm that the mixers are operating properly and that sufficient caustic–oil mixing is being delivered.
572
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
4. Oxidized tocopherols: α-Tocopherol oxides to a very colorful chroman-quinone. It is necessary to determine the cause of oxidation and the corrective maintenance or procedures required to prevent a recurrence of the problem. The high red color should be removed with vacuum bleaching. 5. Cottonseed oil storage: It has been determined that cottonseed oil should be refined as soon as possible. Oxidation of the complex pigment system adversely affects the bleach color. This source of color reversion should be removed with refining before extensive oxidation can develop.
Problem: High Green Color Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Chlorophyll content: High chlorophyll content in soybean and canola oils is usually caused by crop damage by exposure to wet weather in the field, early frosts, or high-moisture storage. It is best to remove chlorophyll before the alkali treatment, as it tends to be stabilized by alkali and heat.
Problem: Positive Acid Heat Break Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Low caustic treat: Recalculate the caustic treat and increase if necessary. Use the minimum caustic treat to obtain a negative acid heat break. 2. Uneven caustic flow: Adjust caustic flow each time the crude flow is changed and determine that the caustic pump is operating properly. 3. Inadequate caustic and crude oil mixing: Make sure that the mixers are operating properly.
Problem: High Soap Content Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. High caustic treat: Check caustic treat and reduce if the acid heat break and lab bleach color are not adversely affected. The NaOH treat selected for the crude oil to be refined will vary with the free fatty acid content of the oil and the level of excess over theoretical determined for each source oil from previous experience. The theoretical quantity of caustic is based on the ratio of molecular weights of NaOH to oleic fatty acid. Most oils are refined with 0.10 to 0.13% excess. Exceptions are lauric and palm oils, which require a minimal excess of approximately 0.02%, and cottonseed oil, which is refined for color reduction and requires a higher excess of approximately 0.16%. 2. Dirty centrifuge bowl: High soap levels (500 ppm or higher) that cannot be corrected with back pressure adjustments are an indication that the machine needs cleaning. 3. Crude-oil flow rate too high: Reduce the flow rate, but make sure that the caustic treat is adjusted accordingly.
Troubleshooting
573
4. Separator bowl revolutions per minute too low: Check rpm and correct if found low. 5. Improper back pressure: Adjust back pressure to reduce the residual soap level in the oil without increasing the oil content of the soapstock. The back pressure usually falls in the range of 3.3 to 6.9 bar (50 to 100 psi). Careful back-pressure control is required to obtain a minimal soap content in the refined oil while achieving minimum neutral oil loss in the soapstock. The compromise adjustments usually border around 300 ppm soap, with 18% neutral oil in the soapstock on a dry weight basis.
Problem: Excess Neutral Oil in Soapstock Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. High-centrifuge back pressure: Increased centrifuge back pressure reduces the soap content in the oil phase, but increases the neutral oil lost in the soapstock. Conversely, reducing the back pressure decreases the neutral oil loss in the soap phase, but can increase the soap in the refined oil to a level beyond the capacity of the water-washing step. The primary back pressure must be carefully adjusted to the best compromise, usually about 300 ppm soap with 18% maximum neutral oil in the soapstock. 2. Caustic addition temperature: Too high of an oil temperature during the caustic addition can increase the saponification rate of the neutral oil and reduce the yield of the refined oil. The temperature of the crude oil at the point of caustic addition should be no higher than 100°F (37.8°C), with a more preferred limit of 90°F (32.2°C). 3. Primary feed temperature: Most soft oil caustic mixtures are heated to 135 to 165°F (57 to 74°C) before delivery to the primary centrifuge to provide the thermal shock necessary to break the oil–caustic–soap emulsion. The best emulsion temperatures for each oil must be determined by experimentation or past experience. 4. Centrifuge breakover: A breakover occurs when the interface suddenly moves toward the bowl periphery and no longer contains the column of oil under the top disc. Large amounts of oil are discharged through the soap outlet in a partial breakover. When a total breakover occurs, the large oil flow quickly forces all the soap from the bowl and all the oil follows through the soap outlet port. Breakovers can happen when the centrifuge bowl is clogged, the refined oil outlet back pressure is too high, or the refined oil temperature or caustic concentration drops considerably. Breakovers can usually be corrected by quickly opening the back pressure valve and readjusting until the soapstock and refined oil are discharging properly. The bowl may have to be reprimed or backflushed to correct large breakovers.13 5. Caustic–crude oil contact time: After the caustic solution addition, the mixture must be blended to ensure adequate contact with the free fatty acid (FFA), phosphatides, and color pigments. Caustic reacts with the free fatty acid to form soapstock, while hydrolyzing phosphatides and removing unsaponifiable material from the crude oil. Sufficient mixing is required, but it must not create a stable emulsion and allow proper soap conditioning. Experimentation may be required to determine the optimum conditions using past experience as guidelines. 6. Solvent-extracted oils: Many times, solvent-extracted oils contain high levels of phosphatides and other thick, gummy, sticky materials that form deposits in storage
574
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
tanks. These materials are difficult to handle, especially as oxidation and polymerization develop. The tank residues can trap high levels of neutral oil to cause high oil losses. The gums emulsify the neutral oil, which is lost to soapstock during refining. Further, splitting the soapstock with acid is more difficult when high gum levels are present. To avoid these problems, degumming of solvent-extracted oil prior to caustic refining has become customary among some processors, especially in Europe.14
Problem: Over-Refining Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Low-refined oil bleach color: A plant-refined oil bleach color significantly lower than the laboratory results indicates over-refining.
Problem: Poor Finished Oil Oxidative Stability Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Oxidized refined oil: It is very important that oxidation be prevented during all stages of edible fats and oils processing because of the detrimental effects on the finished, deodorized oils. For example, it has been estimated that a peroxide value increase of only 1.2 meq/kg for neutralized soybean oil after or during refining may reduce the oxidative stability of the deodorized oil by 50%.14 Oxidation during processing can be minimized by avoiding contact with air, elimination of prooxidant metallic contaminates, nitrogen protection at all stages of processing, or the addition of antioxidants at the initial processing stages.
13.2.6 Oil Refining: Water Wash Problem: High Soap Content Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Low level of wash water: The amount of water required for water washing is 10 to 20% by weight. Generally, the best results are obtained at the 15% level. Determine wash-water level and increase if it is below 15% of the crude oil flow rate. 2. Inadequate mixing of wash water and refined oil: The water–oil combination is mixed to obtain intimate contact for maximum soap transfer from the oil to the water phase. 3. Hard water: Hard water with calcium and magnesium deposits should not be used for the water washing operation. If the water hardness exceeds 20 ppm, a water softener or condensate from the steam system should be used. 4. Dirty separator: The time required between cleanings cannot be predicted; the water-wash bowl must be cleaned on demand. The water-wash centrifuge probably requires cleaning when the residual soap for the refined oil exiting the vacuum dryer exceeds 50 ppm if the soap from the primary is less than 500 ppm.
Troubleshooting
575
5. High soap content from the primary: The water-wash operation can handle incoming soap levels of only 500 ppm or less. 6. Water addition temperature: The wash-water temperature is important for efficient separation in the centrifuge. The wash-water temperature should be 10 to 15°F (5 to 8°C) warmer than the oil to prevent emulsions. 7. Oil temperature: Refined oil from the primary centrifuge should be heated as necessary to 190°F (88°C). A low temperature to the water-wash centrifuge can cause breakover.
13.2.7 Oil Refining: Vacuum Drying Problem: High Moisture Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Low vacuum: A typical dryer operates at 70 cmHg and should be equipped with a high-level alarm and automatic shutdown capability. 2. Low water-wash temperature: Normal water-wash temperature is 185°F (85°C). 3. High moisture to the dryer: Correct the problem in the water-wash operation. 4. Poor oil distribution in the dryer: Clean the plugged nozzles.
13.2.8 Prebleaching Problem: Short Filtration Cycle Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Inadequate body feed: The flow rate during precoating should be the same as during filtration. A filter with too slow a precoat rate or with an uneven hydraulic flow will produce an uneven precoat that results in blinded screens and short cycles. 2. Too high flow rate: High flow rates cause packing of the solids to blind the screens. 3. Too low flow rate: Low flow rates allow the solids to settle in the filter shell instead of precoating the screens. 4. Blinded screens: Screens blinded with soap or uneven flow provides a reduced surface area that causes short cycles. 5. Filter too small: A solids load too great for the filter utilized will necessitate frequent process interruptions to clean the filter.
Problem: Slow Filter Rate Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Full filter: Clean the filter. 2. High-moisture oil (over 0.1 %): Correct upstream problem at vacuum dryer or water wash. 3. High soap: The soap content of vacuum-dried oil to prebleaching should not exceed 50 ppm. Higher soap levels require excessive bleaching earth usage or allow soap to remain in the oil, which can blind the filters.
576
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
4. High phosphatides: The phosphorus level in refined oil sent to bleaching should not exceed 6.0 ppm. Higher levels will require higher bleaching earth usage levels and increase the risk of higher phosphorus in the bleached oil. Bleached oil should not exceed 1.0 ppm phosphorus. This problem requires a correction of upstream problems with the caustic treat or mixer operation, which should have been indicated by negative acid heat break evaluation results. 5. High oil-flow rate: The flow rate through the filter must not exceed the design limit. High flow rates cause premature blinding of the filter and reduce efficiency. A flow-rate controller should be required at the exit of the filter.
Problem: High Impurities in Filtered Oil Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Inadequate precoating of the filter: Recirculate until the impurities improve; if impurities persist, stop and precoat the filter properly. 2. Holes in the filter screens: Repair or replace the screens. 3. Improper filter assembly after cleaning: Reassemble properly. 4. Worn seals or gaskets: Replace defective seals and gaskets. 5. Early delivery: During the startup cycle of the bleaching filters, care must be taken to return the initial cloudy oil to the bleaching vessel instead of contaminating the bleached oil storage.
Problem: High Soap Level in Bleached Oil Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. High incoming oil soap content: Correct upstream problem, probably at the primary or water-wash processes. The soap content of the incoming vacuum-dried oil should not exceed 50 ppm, as higher bleaching-earth levels are required to adsorb the excess soap. 2. Poor precoating: Precoat filter properly to avoid channeling. 3. Inadequate recirculation through the filter: Proper contact time between the oil and the bleaching earth is essential. 4. Bleaching-earth addition: Make sure that the bleaching-earth feeder is operating properly.
Problem: Poor Bleach Color Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Low bleaching-earth level: The amount of bleaching earth to be used should be the minimum amount needed to effect removal of the impurities as measured by peroxide reduction, with a zero value as the target. Normally, 0.3 to 0.5% activated bleaching earth is sufficient, depending on the quality of the oil and press effect
Troubleshooting
577
opportunities. The clay addition should be guided by performance, not a mandatory addition level. 2. Short contact time: Recirculate through the filter and determine the effect. Usually 15 to 20 minutes of contact time between the oil and the bleaching earth is adequate to drive off the moisture in the bleaching earth and complete the bleaching reaction with atmospheric bleaching. In vacuum bleaching, the greatest color reduction is realized within the first three minutes of contact because the air and moisture are removed by the vacuum. Extending the contact time does not harm the vacuumbleached oil because oxidation is prevented by the vacuum. 3. Low bleaching temperature: Bleaching temperatures can be increased, but should not exceed 110°C (230°F). Heating should take place after the addition of the bleaching earth. Higher oil temperature reduces oil viscosity, which improves the adsorptivity of the bleaching earth; however, no significant improvement is experienced above 110°C. Problems with increased free fatty acid development, oxidation, and color fixing can result with temperatures exceeding 110°C. 4. Bleaching-earth addition temperature: Addition of the bleaching medium to hot oil vaporizes the moisture in the clay too soon. The moisture release allows the lattice structure in the clay to collapse, which reduces the effective surface area before it has an opportunity to adsorb the color pigments and the secondary oxidation products. 5. Agitation: Bleaching-vessel agitation should be sufficient to achieve good contact of the earth with the oil without incorporating air. 6. Inadequate refining: Check upstream problems (caustic treat or mixing in refining). 7. Color set in the incoming crude oil: Re-refine or segregate for use where higher color is acceptable. 8. Green-color removal: High chlorophyll in soybean and canola oils because crop damage may be easier to remove before alkali treatment, as it tends to be stabilized by alkali and heat. 9. Cottonseed oil crude storage: Good-quality crude cottonseed oil can be stored for up to five months at cool temperatures with no appreciable changes in free fatty acids, refining loss, color, or flavor; however, bleachability noticeably decreases.8 Oxidation of the complex pigment system in cottonseed oil affects bleach color. Refining before extensive oxidation of the pigments occurs removes the source of the color reversion; therefore, it is more desirable to store cottonseed oil as refined, rather than crude.
Problem: High Oil Loss Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Excessive bleaching earth: Activated bleaching earths can retain as much as 70% of their weight in oil, which is not recovered. Increased bleaching-earth usage improves prebleaching effectiveness up to a certain point. After that, additional bleaching earth usage only increases oil losses and free fatty acids. The amount of bleaching earth required must be determined by the prebleached oil quality (i.e., acceptable red or green color, complete soap removal, and a zero peroxide value).
578
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Problem: Trans Fatty Acid Development Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Bleaching conditions: Trans fatty acids developed during bleaching depend on temperature, time, and amounts of bleaching earth used. Cis-trans occurs with high temperatures (>110°C or >230°F) and elevated amounts of bleaching earth.15 2. Trans fatty acid identity: Thermally induced geometric isomerization typically affects linolenic (C-18:3) fatty acid, which is different from the trans-isomers of oleic (C-18:1) fatty acid formed during hydrogenation. Thermally induced geometric isomerization is also accompanied by varying degrees of positional isomerization.16 Determination of the trans fatty acid identity indicates the process responsible for its isomerization.
13.2.9 Hydrogenation Problem: Slow Reaction Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Poor catalyst activity: Increase the catalyst level. The poor activity may be caused by catalyst poisons or a lower nickel content in a different lot of catalyst. 2. Old catalyst: Add fresh catalyst. A catalyst that has been in storage for long periods may have deteriorated from abuse or contamination. 3. Gas purity: The hydrogen gas used must be at least 99.0% pure. It should be dry and free of contaminant gases, such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S), sulfur oxide (SO2), and carbon disulfide (CS2). When hydrogen gas contains sulfur compounds, the sulfur combines with nickel, poisoning the catalyst and reducing activity and selectivity substantially. Impurities, such as carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrogen (N2), do not affect catalyst activity.17 4. Not enough hydrogen gas: Short term: Stop the reaction and wait until sufficient hydrogen gas is available. Long term: Determine the cause of insufficient hydrogen gas and correct the problem. 5. Poor agitation: Make sure that the agitators are turned on and operational. Internal inspection of the converter may be necessary to determine the condition of the agitator shaft and blades. 6. Soap content: The oil soap content to hydrogenation should be 1.0 ppm maximum and must never exceed 20 ppm. Soap poisons the catalyst by reacting with the nickel to form nickel soaps, which reduce the available nickel proportionally. 7. Phosphatide content: Gums poison the catalyst, precipitate at hydrogenation temperatures, darken the oil, and blind the catalyst filters. The phosphorus content of the oil sent to hydrogenation should not exceed 5 ppm. High phosphatide problems must be addressed upstream in degumming, refining, and bleaching to meet the process quality standards before releasing the oil to the next process. 8. Sulfur poisoning: Particularly long induction periods occur in the presence of sulfur compounds. Reaction with sulfur inhibits the capacity of nickel to adsorb and dissociate hydrogen, reducing the total activity of the catalyst. As the ability of the nickel to hydrogenate is reduced, its tendency to promote isomerization is
Troubleshooting
579
enhanced to produce large quantities of trans-isomers. Wet-milled corn oils can contain sulfur, which must be removed in prebleaching to prevent hydrogenation and flavor problems. 9. Moisture content: Moisture inactivates the catalyst and can promote free fatty acid formation by hydrolysis. Analysis of the oil should confirm a 0.10% maximum moisture before the reaction is started. Hydrogenation feedstock oils with higher moisture levels should be dried before the catalyst is added. 10. Cooling and heating coil leaks: Steam leaks in the converter coils may be the cause of high moisture content if the oil was dry from the supply vessel. 11. Low temperature: Hydrogenation, like most chemical reactions, proceeds at a faster rate with increased temperatures. Increased temperatures decrease the solubility rate of the hydrogen gas to effect a lower concentration of hydrogen on the catalyst surface, which increases selectivity, trans-isomer development, and the reaction rate. The process control records should be reviewed to determine if the reaction rate is slower than usual for a particular product. If it is indeed slower, the temperature controllers should be checked for accuracy before proceeding to the other potential causes. 12. Product characteristics: The desired characteristics for the product being produced may require a slower reaction time. The usual reaction time should be ascertained from the process control records.
Problem: Wrong Melting Point/Iodine Value Relationship Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Wrong catalyst used: Commercial nickel catalysts vary considerably in their inherent preferential selectivity. Also, used catalysts are less preferentially selective than new catalysts. High-selectivity catalysts enable the reduction of linoleic fatty acid without producing high levels of stearic fatty acid for a product with good oxidative stability and a low melting point. 2. New catalyst lot: The nickel content of a new lot of catalysts may be different enough from the previous lot to affect the activity; the new lot may require more or less total catalyst to achieve the desired physical requirements. 3. Contamination with a previous batch: All precautions should be taken to ensure that no oil from the previous batch is left in the converter or drop tank to contaminate the next batch.
Problem: Catalyst Filtration Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Selective catalyst: Hydrogenation catalyst must exhibit both a high activity and a selectivity, and it is also essential that the catalyst can be filtered rapidly. These two objectives are somewhat incompatible because a very selective catalyst would have wide shallow pores, which implies small particles that lead to filtration problems. 2. Reused catalyst: Extensive reuse of catalyst can cause filtration problems because (1) FFA in the feedstock react with the nickel to form nickel soaps that pass through the screens on most black presses, and (2) the catalyst particle size will decrease
580
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
with mechanical attrition and will pass through most catalyst filters. Hydrogenated oils must be postbleached to ensure the removal of trace quantities of nickel, which can adversely affect oxidative stability. 3. Phosphatides content: Gums precipitate at hydrogenation temperatures and will blind filters, making filtration almost impossible. Short term, the filters must be cleaned frequently until the problem batch is filtered. Long term, the problem must be addressed upstream in degumming, refining, and bleaching to deliver oils with less than 5 ppm phosphorus.
Problem: Basestock AOM Stability Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Soft and hard basestock blending: Blending a slightly over-hydrogenated batch with an under-hydrogenated batch can probably meet desired physical characteristics, such as solid fat index (SFI) and melting point, but the AOM stability results will be poorer than if the two batches were hydrogenated to the correct endpoint. Very soft basestocks should not be produced to blend a very hard basestock into the desired limits. Hard basestocks should be hardened further to the next harder basestock or to almost complete hydrogenation to produce a lowiodine-value hardstock. 2. Nickel residue: Trace quantities of nickel passing through the catalyst filter will adversely affect the oxidative stability of the hydrogenated oil. Stability studies have shown that 2.2 ppm nickel will reduce the AOM stability of lard by 50%. Hydrogenated oils must be postbleached to ensure the removal of trace quantities of nickel remaining after catalyst filtration.
13.2.10 Interesterification Problem: Poor Yield Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Chemical catalyst deactivation: Phosphoric acid or carbon dioxide deactivation of sodium methylate before water washing forms sodium hydroxide and monoand diglyceride upon contact with water. Formation of these impurities reduces the interesterified product yield.18 2. Feedstock impurities: Free fatty acid, moisture, peroxides, and soap impurities in the feedstock to the interesterification reaction will neutralize chemical catalyst (each 0.1% additional catalyst results in a neutral oil loss of about 1%19): a. Each 0.05% FFA requires about 0.01% additional chemical catalyst. b. 0.01% moisture neutralizes about 0.04% catalyst. c. Feedstock with a peroxide value exceeding 10 meq/kg should be bleached for optimum performance.20 d. Feedstock soap analysis should be neutral to the chemical interesterification reaction; feedstock with a soap content should be rebleached.20
Troubleshooting
581
Problem: Emulsion Interesterification batches can form emulsions during water washing to deactivate the chemical catalyst. These emulsions must be broken to effect separation of the oil and water phases. Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Separation methods: Two methods of effecting separation of an interesterification water-washed product emulsion are18 a. Salt, in solution, added in an amount equal to the catalyst used. b. Lowering the pH with citric or phosphoric acid; citric is preferred because of the off-flavor potential with phosphoric acid.
13.2.11 Postbleaching Problem: High Nickel Content Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Soluble or colloidal nickel: Correct the source of the colloidal nickel problem or ensure that the hydrogenated oil is acid treated with 50 to 100 ppm citric acid and postbleached using bleaching earth. 2. Short contact time between the oil and the bleaching earth: Recirculate through the press until the specified postbleach color is achieved and other analytical limits are met. 3. Citric or phosphoric acid use: Hydrogenated oils require a special posttreatment to remove traces of nickel from the finished product. During hydrogenation, nickel soaps are formed and are sufficiently oil soluble to remain in the oil during filtration. Citric acid, approximately 100 ppm added prior to postbleaching, will chelate the remaining nickel and leave a residual nickel of less than 1.5 ppm. Industry results indicate that a residue 0.1 to 1.5 ppm nickel may be present in deodorized oils without substantial harm to the oxidative stability.21 4. No bleaching earth used: Ensure that bleaching earth has been added to the oil.
Problem: High Impurities in the Filtered Oil Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Inadequate precoating of the filter: Recirculate until the impurities improve; if the impurities persist, stop and precoat the filter properly. 2. Holes in the filter screens, cloths, or papers: Repair or replace. 3. Improper filter assembly: Reassemble properly. 4. Worn seals or gaskets: Replace defective seals or gaskets.
582
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Problem: Poor Bleach Color Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Low bleaching-earth level: The amount of bleaching earth to be used should be the minimum amount required to effect removal of the impurities as measured by peroxide reduction, with zero as the target. The bleaching-earth level should be guided by performance, not a mandatory addition level. 2. Short contact time: Usually 15 to 20 minutes of contact time between the oil and the bleaching earth is adequate to drive off the moisture in the bleaching earth and complete the bleaching reaction with atmospheric bleaching. In vacuum bleaching, the greatest color reduction is realized within the first three minutes of contact because the air and moisture are removed by the vacuum. Extending the contact time does not harm the vacuum-bleached oil because oxidation is prevented by the vacuum. 3. Low bleaching temperature: Bleaching temperatures can be increased, but should not exceed 110°C (230°F). Heating of the oil should take place after the addition of the bleaching earth. A higher oil temperature reduces oil viscosity, which improves the adsorptivity of the bleaching earth; however, no significant improvements are experienced above 110°C. Problems with increased free fatty acid development, oxidation, and color fixing can result with temperatures exceeding 110°C. 4. Inadequate refining: Check upstream problems: caustic treat or mixing in refining. 5. Bleaching-earth addition temperature: Addition of the bleaching medium to hot oil vaporizes the moisture in the clay too soon. The moisture release allows the lattice structure in the clay to collapse, which reduces the effective surface area before it has an opportunity to adsorb the color pigments and the secondary oxidation products. 6. Agitation: Bleaching-vessel agitation should be sufficient to achieve good contact of the earth with the oil without incorporating air.
Problem: High Peroxide Value Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Product skipped bleaching: Properly bleached oils have a zero peroxide value. High peroxide values for products coming out of bleaching indicate that the product has not been bleached with bleaching earth; it may have been pumped through the system without the addition of bleaching earth because the color met the required limits before bleaching. Postbleaching is mandatory after hydrogenation to ensure that any trace metals and secondary oxidation precursors are removed. A zero peroxide value out of postbleach indicates that the product has been bleached properly.
13.2.12 Winterization Problem: Poor Cold Test Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Filtered-oil temperature too high: Cool the oil to the proper temperature before filtering (45°F or 7.2°C).
Troubleshooting
583
2. Rapid cooling rate: Ensure that the oil is not cooled at too rapid a rate to produce the desired crystal; a temperature change from 104 to 45°F (40 to 7.2°C) over a 12-hour period is generally acceptable. 3. Broken screen or torn cloth: Inspect and correct the problem. 4. Leaking seals or gaskets: Inspect and correct the problem. 5. Improper filter cooling after hot-oil wash: Cool the filter to the desired temperature after each hot-oil wash. 6. Warm filter room: Keep the filter cool to prevent stearine from melting and remixing with the salad oil. 7. Mixing low and high cold-test oils: Low cold-test products should be kept separate from salad oils with satisfactory analysis. Blends of winterized oils with good and poor cold-test results normally result in a substandard cold test for the blend. A laboratory-prepared blend of the two products should be evaluated and found satisfactory prior to any blending of batches.
Problem: Slow Filtration Rate Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Cold oil: Check the oil temperature for adjustment of subsequent batches. 2. Wet oil: Moisture levels above 0.1% will cause filtration problems. Trace and correct the moisture problem to speed up filtration on subsequent batches. 3. High soap content (over 50 ppm): Take corrective action in refining, water-washing, or prebleaching to correct the problem for future production. 4. High phosphatide level (over 4 ppm phosphorus): Remedy the problem upstream in the refining process for future production. 5. Overpressurization of the filter by the feed pump: Make sure that the back-pressure control system is operational. 6. Blinded screens: Externally wash blinded screens. 7. Winterized oil crystal abuse: Do not pump or recirculate winterized oil any more than absolutely necessary before filtration; fractured crystals filter slowly. 8. Low chill-tank loading temperature: Improper graining, which affects the filtration rate, results from cool chill-tank loading temperatures. The chill-tank supply oil temperature should be adjusted to meet the established limits before loading.
Problem: Poor Salad Oil Yield Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Long graining or chilling time: The solidified oil can entrap the liquid oil decreasing the salad oil yield. 2. Hydrogenation conditions: The hydrogenation conditions for oil to be winterized for salad oil should produce the least possible saturates and trans-isomers while reducing the linolenic fatty acid (C-18:3) content. Nonselective hydrogenation conditions of low temperature, high pressure, and a low catalyst concentration normally produce the desired low saturates and trans-isomers. 3. Low chilling temperatures: High viscosities caused by low crystallization temperatures inhibit the desired crystal growth. Filtration efficiency is dependent on the crystal size and entrapped liquid oil within the crystal matrix.
584
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
13.2.13 Dewaxing Problem: Poor Filtration Rate Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Sunflower oil temperature: Crystallization and maturation require gradually cooling the oil to 40 to 50°F (4.4 to 10°C) for stable β-crystals; however, the viscosity does not allow an acceptable filtration rate at this temperature. Heating the oil up to 54 to 57°F (12.2 to 13.9°C) increases the filtration rate approximately 60%. 2. Gums: It is necessary to remove gums before dewaxing. The presence of gums in the oil influences the formation and stability of the formed crystals to diminish the filtration rate of the oil. Dewaxing should be performed after prebleaching and prior to deodorization. 3. Diatomaceous earth addition: The addition of small amounts of diatomaceous earth to cold sunflower oil has been reported to increase the filtration rate by a factor of four.22
Problem: Wax Content Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Hybrid sunflower oil: Hybrid sunflowers that have replaced the open-pollinated varieties have improved plant uniformity, yields, and disease resistance; however, the higher oil-content seeds with reduced hull content have increased wax levels in the hull, and the hulls are more difficult to separate from the kernels when processing to extract the oil. The soluble waxes in the oil at ambient temperature will cause an unsightly cloudy appearance at cooler temperatures. Dewaxing is required to maintain a clear sunflower oil. 2. Hulled versus dehulled sunflower seeds: The wax content in sunflower oil is dependent on the seed-handling practice. Sunflower oil from dehulled seeds will generally contain 0.011 to 0.015% wax, whereas seeds with hulls provide waxes in the 0.06 to 0.09% range.22 3. Canola oil: Canola oil is generally a clear oil that does not require winterization. However, canola oil that has satisfactorily passed the standard cold test has developed an unsightly thread or layer of solidified material in retail bottled oils on the grocery store shelf. Analysis of the sediment material indicated waxes with carbon number C42–C52. The triglyceride profiles contained four triglycerides: PPO, PPP, PSO, and PPS. The waxes solidified with time at higher temperatures than the cold test 0°C. Fortunately, a revision of the cold test procedure was identified that rapidly confirmed this problem. Evaluation of a 70% acetone–30% oil mixture before performing the standard cold test procedure identifies canola oils that will develop the problem. Oils with the waxes, cloud with this procedure after six hours in a 0°C bath. Dewaxing of these oils removes the threat of the unsightly layer of material on the store shelves.23,24
Troubleshooting
585
13.2.14 Esterification Problem: High Color Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Air contact: Fatty emulsifiers must be protected from air incorporation throughout the alcoholysis process to prevent oxidation of the unsaturated fatty acids or the α-tocopherols with attendant color development. Some potential air sources during fatty emulsifier production are (1) air leaks in fittings below the product level and in pumps, as well as holes in the reaction vessel, heaters, and coolers; (2) improper deaeration of the reaction mixture; and (3) the stripping steam must be generated from deaerated water to be oxygen free. 2. Basestock hydrogenation catalyst: Emulsifier basestocks must be free of the residual nickel that catalyzes oxidation. Reused catalyst can cause filtration problems for two reasons. The first is that the free fatty acids in the hydrogenation feedstock react with the nickel catalyst and form nickel soaps, which pass through filters. Second, the reuse catalyst particle size may have been reduced to sizes that will not be retained on the filter; only new easily filtered catalyst should be utilized for emulsifier basestocks. 3. Basestock postbleaching: Hydrogenated oils require postbleaching to remove traces of nickel from the finished product. Nickel soaps formed during hydrogenation are oil soluble and remain in the oil after filtration. Addition of 100-ppm citric acid prior to postbleaching will chelate the remaining nickel for more efficient filtration after bleaching. Additionally, the hydrogenated basestock must be bleached with bleaching earth, even when the analytical color limits indicate that bleaching is not required to obtain the specified color. A zero peroxide value indicating removal of secondary oxidation materials is also a prerequisite for emulsifier basestock postbleaching. 4. Nitrogen protection: Relatively low levels of oxidation prior to alcoholysis can significantly impair the oxidative stability of the finished emulsifier. Quality products require a minimum of oxygen exposure before processing, which necessitates effective nitrogen blanketing of all emulsifier basestocks during storage or transportation, including the low-iodine-value bases. 5. Oxidized tocopherols: α-Tocopherol oxides to a very colorful chromanquinone, which is probably catalyzed by excessive acidity of the processed oil or emulsifier at some point during processing of the oils, basestocks, or emulsifiers. 6. High discharge temperature: Proper cooling while protected by the vacuum before exposure to the atmosphere is mandatory for oxidative stability and color control. The product discharge temperature must be as low as possible while still maintaining the product as a fluid, pumpable product. 7. Catalyst selection: Less color development in mono- and diglycerides has been experienced with the use of calcium hydroxide as opposed to sodium hydroxide.25 8. Filter aid: Only neutral filter aids should be utilized for emulsifier filtration. Modified filter aids can have deleterious effects on the emulsifier color. 9. Rust: Iron oxides are soluble in monoglyceride and many other emulsifiers. Rust, from washed black-iron surfaces that are not protected or sweetened with oil immediately, will cause darker emulsifier colors.26
586
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
10. High feedstock color: The color of the feedstock to the reaction should be analyzed to ensure that a color reversion has not occurred between the postbleach process and the glycerination feedstock tanks. 11. Incomplete neutralization: The presence of catalyst will catalyze red color development. Neutralization should be confirmed with soap or pH analysis to ensure that the catalyst has been properly neutralized. It is important to maintain a pH of <5 for color stability. 12. Carbon steel reaction vessel: Ordinary carbon steel is not a suitable material for reaction vessels, as it contaminates the product with iron soaps, which cause darkcolored product. Stainless-steel equipment and vessels are preferred.25 13. pH control: An emulsifier pH of <5 is necessary to maintain color stability in storage.27
Problem: Low α-Monoglyceride Content Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Reversible reaction: Esterification is a reversible reaction, especially in the presence of a catalyst at elevated temperatures. Reversion of monoglyceride occurs at the point of reaction completion before catalyst neutralization or after if neutralization is incomplete. During cooling prior to glycerol removal, the excess glycerine is less soluble in the fat phase and separates into the lower layer. This shifts the equilibrium somewhat to regenerate diglycerides and triglycerides; therefore, catalyst neutralization and excess glycerine removal are critical stages of glycerolysis, which must be performed with close and precise control.25 2. Excessive steam stripping: Most emulsifier specifications allow a 1.0 to 1.5% free fatty acid limit to allow steam stripping to be suspended before the α-monoglyceride content is reduced below the specified limits. 3. High reaction temperature: The reaction should be performed within a temperature range of 175 to 250°C (347 to 482°F). Higher temperature reactions cause the formation of polyglycerols and polymerized glycerides, which affect both the monoglyceride yield and functionality of the emulsifier product. 4. Low reaction temperature: Glycerolysis is temperature dependent. The monoglyceride level is determined by the glycerol miscibility in oil. For example, no more than 45% monoglyceride can be obtained with a 180°C (356°F) reaction temperature. 5. Low level of glycerin to reaction: It is necessary to maintain the prescribed glycerine level in the reaction mixture to obtain the specified α-monoglyceride content. Two usual causes for a low glycerin level in the reaction have been (1) incorrect amount added, and (2) glycerin flashed off before the reaction. An incorrect addition level can be a result of calculation error, incorrect pumping, pump failure, etc. Glycerin can be flashed off or lost to entrainment due to high temperature, high vacuum, or stripping-steam use during the drying process. 6. Low catalyst level: The amount of reactive glycerin depends on the level of catalyst used. Therefore, additions of catalyst at low levels will result in low monoglyceride contents. A low catalyst level may be a result of a calculation error, a higher dilution than specified, faulty addition procedures or equipment, an excess of other reactants, etc.
Troubleshooting
587
7. Incomplete catalyst neutralization: Catalyst presence after the reaction enhances the potential reversion of the monoglyceride reaction. Catalyst neutralization should be monitored by soap content or pH analysis or both. A high soap content or an alkaline pH indicates incomplete catalyst neutralization. 8. Acid addition procedure: Phosphoric acid must be added slowly to allow for proper dispersion. Rapid addition of the neutralization acid, especially with poor agitation, will allow it to drop to the bottom of the reactor, where it can be ineffective. Insufficient catalyst neutralization will allow the reaction to reverse during stripping of the excess glycerine for a low active emulsifier content. 9. Low reaction time or temperature: A low reaction temperature or time can provide an incomplete reaction for a low α-monoglyceride or propylene glycol monoester (PGME) content, depending on the product being produced. 10. Reused glycerine: Monoglyceride yield can decrease with the use of recycled glycerine from previous production. Phosphate salts are formed when the catalyst is neutralized with phosphoric acid. Trisodium phosphate is formed by the reaction of the acid with the catalyst, but the excess acid used forms NaH 2PO 4 and some Na 2HPO 4. Trisodium phosphate is crystalline and can be easily removed by filtration; however, the acid salts are not crystalline and remain dispersed in the product. It is necessary to mix the molecular-still residue with diatomaceous earth to remove these acid phosphate salts by filtration or with a centrifuge.27
Problem: Impurities Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Phosphate salts: Impurities identified as phosphate salts have been found in products shipped to customers shortly after production. Studies have determined that glycerolysis catalyst neutralization is related to time and temperature; at 350°F (176.7°C), neutralization is completed within 10 minutes, whereas it requires 8 to 12 hours at 190°F (87.7°C). Emulsifiers neutralized at low temperatures may require a holding time before filtration or a second filtration to remove all of the phosphate salts. 2. Early delivery: During the startup cycle of the phosphate salt filters, care must be exercised to recycle the initial cloudy emulsifier instead of contaminating the emulsifier storage vessel. 3. Filter screen holes: Stream and representative batch samples must be evaluated for clarity to determine that the filters are operating satisfactorily. Positive impurities in any of these samples identifies a problem that must be investigated and a solution determined before proceeding. 4. Neutralization: Filtration is affected by the type of phosphate salt produced. Trisodium phosphate is the most desirable because it is crystalline and can be easily removed by filtration; however, the excess phosphoric acid used to produce an acidic pH also produces acid salts. These salts, NaH2PO4 and some Na2HPO4, which are not crystalline, are difficult to filter and usually remain dispersed in the product. A suggested remedy to remove the acid salts is to use diatomaceous earth as an absorbent prior to filtration.27
588
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Problem: High Free Fatty Acid Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Excessive acid neutralization: Phosphoric acid is normally used to neutralize the alkaline catalyst. Excess phosphoric acid usage will be revealed during analysis as free fatty acid and catalyzed additional free fatty acid development. 2. Insufficient stripping: FFA is removed by steam distillation after the reaction has been terminated. Insufficient steam distillation will not effectively reduce the free fatty acid level; however, overstripping can reduce the α-monoglyceride content. 3. Wet reactants: Addition of moisture to the reaction will cause hydrolysis, which results in free fatty acid development. A higher free fatty acid level may require additional stripping to meet the required limits, which may, in turn, lower the α-monoglyceride content. Wet feedstock or glycerin can be caused by moisture contamination from wet steam, steaming lines into the storage tanks, leaks in the heating or cooling coils, or the like. The source of the moisture must be identified and the reactants dried before use.
13.2.15 Blending Problem: AOM Stability Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Soft basestock addition: Blending a mix with a soft, unspecified basestock, with a high unsaturated fatty acid level will decrease the oxidative stability of the product. Blends should be made only with the basestocks specified to maintain the designed AOM stability of the finished product. 2. Exceeding composition tolerances: Blending with a specified basestock outside the specification tolerances will affect the oxidative stability of the product. 3. Salad oil stearin usage: Natural antioxidants accumulate in the liquid fraction of a winterized or fractionated product, thus the stearin fraction has less oxidative protection than oils with the same hardness produced from regular source oils.
Problem: Government Regulations Compliance Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Ingredient statements: U.S. Food and Drug Administration labeling regulations require identification of each source oil in descending order of predominance. Blending changes outside the specified composition and tolerances can violate the ingredient statement requirements. 2. Nutritional disclosures: Nutritional disclosures are made for edible fats and oils products based on the fatty acid compositions of the individual products. In most cases, the product tolerances must be established based on the allowed rounding of the values. Blending outside the specification composition tolerance range or with
Troubleshooting
589
unauthorized basestocks will result in product characteristics outside the nutritional claims. In this case, there is no good or bad — just right or wrong.
Problem: Solid Fat Index/Solid Fat Content (SFI/SFC) Compliance Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Basestock blending: Fats and oils mixes made with basestocks previously blended for solid fat index (SFI) limits compliance will not have the same effect upon subsequent blends as hydrogenated basestocks produced in limits. Both the fatty acid composition and the triglyceride composition are changed with each blend. 2. Sampling technique: Fats and oils blends should be agitated a minimum of 20 minutes at 10°F (5.6°C) above the expected melting point of the blend. Prior to sampling, the sample line and valve must be flushed with the current product to remove all previous product residue, and the sample container must be clean. 3. Incorrect pumping: Errors in pumping should be indicated first by a high or low melting point analysis. Material balance and a review of the product transfers should help identify the resultant blend composition for determination of corrective actions. 4. Triglyceride rearrangement: Thermally induced isomerization can cause the rearrangement of the fatty acids on the glycerine molecule. This modification of the triglycerides usually results in SFI/SFC and melting point changes. 5. Fatty Acid Vaporization: Deodorization of fats and oils with short or medium chain fatty acids can result in vaporization of these low melting triglycerides to alter the SFI/SFC and melting characteristics.
Problem: Poor Performance Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Substitution basestocks: Substitution or addition of a nonspecified basestock may meet the analytical limits specified but affect the performance of the product. Only specified basestocks should be used for blending. The product composition specified represents the product developed and approved by the customers. Product consistencies and performance are dependent on compositions as much as, and sometimes more than, the analytical values. It may be possible to meet the specified analytical limits with several different basestock blends, but only one will perform properly.
13.2.16 Deodorization Problem: Trans Fatty Acid Development Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. High temperature deodorization: High temperature deodorization isomerizes unsaturated cis fatty acids to produce trans fatty acids. Generally, trans fatty acid
590
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
formation during deodorization is negligible below 428°F (220°C), becomes significant between 428 and 464°F (220 and 240°C), and nearly exponential above 464°F (240°C). 2. Deodorization time at high temperatures: The period spent at elevated temperatures must be minimized because time is a major factor in the formation of geometric isomers. Heating and cooling times, when the temperature exceeds 230°C (446°F), must be included in the time factor.16 3. Source oil: The susceptibility of trans formation during deodorization increases as the unsaturation level of the fatty acids multiply. In general, the rate of cis/trans isomerization of linolenic (C-18:3) fatty acid is about 10 times higher than linoleic (C-18:2) and 100 times higher than oleic (C-18:1) fatty acid. Deodorization time and temperature conditions must be adjusted for the oil types processed to maintain an acceptable trans fatty acid level. Decreased deodorizer temperatures will probably require an increased stripping steam quality for adequate free fatty acid removal.28 4. Trans fatty acid identity: Thermally induced geometric isomerization mainly affects linolenic (C-18:3) fatty acids, which is different from the trans-isomers of oleic (C-18:1) fatty acid formed during hydrogenation. Thermally induced geometric isomerization is also accompanied by varying degrees of positional isomerization.16 Determination of the trans fatty acid identity indicates the process responsible for its isomerization. 5. Deodorization conditions: Trans fatty acids developed during deodorization depends on temperature and time. Cis-trans isomerization occurs with high temperatures (>110°C or >230°F).15 The deodorizer pressure and sparging steam rate have no measurable effect upon trans fatty acid development.28 6. Poor quality crude oil: More severe refining, bleaching, and refining conditions are required to meet the process standards. The sever conditions usually involve a high temperature for a long time and a high amount of processing aids that can contribute to trans-isomers development at any processing stage.15
Problem: Excessive Tocopherol Removal Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. High temperature: Thermal degradation of the tocopherols becomes significant at deodorizer temperatures above 500°F (260°C). It has determined that twice as many tocopherols and sterols are stripped out of the oil at 525°F (275°C) as at 465°F (240°C).28 2. Pressure variations effect: Pressure variation of 2 to 6 mbar have only a slight effect on tocopherol/sterol stripping.28
Problem: High Free Fatty Acid Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Low vacuum: Identify and correct the vacuum problem. Refer to the poor deodorizer vacuum section for possible problems and solutions. 2. Low oil temperature: Increase oil temperature. 3. High oil-flow rate: Increase residence time by reducing the flow rate.
Troubleshooting
591
4. Poor steam distribution: Clean steam sparge ring. 5. Too high or too low sparge steam pressure: Reduce if too high or increase with extreme caution if too low. 6. Supply oil has high free fatty acid: Recirculate to attain the specified free fatty acid level, but identify upstream problem and correct for subsequent production. 7. Excessive shell drain (semicontinuous deodorizer): Drain more frequently until the reason for the increased shell drain can be identified and corrected. 8. High CO2 content in nitrogen gas: CO2 will analyze as free fatty acid. It can be determined that CO2 is causing the high result by evacuating all the gases from the oil sample with a vacuum and retesting for free fatty acid content. A lower free fatty acid result would indicate CO2 contamination of the nitrogen gas supply, probably at the in-house gas generating plant. Correction of the gas plant problem or purchase of liquid nitrogen would be two potential corrective actions. 9. Chelating acid addition: Typical chelating acid addition levels are 50 to 100 ppm citric acid or 10 ppm phosphoric acid; 0.00227% citric acid analyzes as 0.01% free fatty acid.28 The expected free fatty acid rise, due to chelating acid addition, must be accounted for in the equipment design and development of specification limits. 10. Antioxidant addition: Antioxidants will contribute to the apparent fatty acid content because the analytical method does not distinguish between acidity contributed by fatty acids or mineral acids. The free fatty acid level of the deodorized oil must be low enough to allow for the increase contributed by antioxidants and acid chelates. 11. Instrumentation accuracy: Preventive maintenance should be performed on a regular basis and instruments recalibrated whenever poor performance is suspected. 12. Phosphoric acid overdose: Oils are acid-treated prior to refining and bleaching to reduce the phosphorus content and chelate the trace metals and again after deodorization to chelate metals. Phosphoric acid is usually less expensive and more effective than the alternative citric acid; however, it has been found to form compounds with the partial glycerides and carbohydrates in the oil, making it difficult to achieve the desired free fatty acid content, or the level of free fatty acid may rise rapidly during storage. These reactions are not experienced with citric acid until the treatment level is increased substantially.
Problem: Dark Oil Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. High soap content: The problem batch must be rebleached and redeodorized to remove the soap and reduce the color. The cause of the problem upstream in refining or prebleaching should be identified to prevent future problems. 2. High phosphatides content: Deodorizer feedstock with a phosphatide content above 20 ppm will cause high deodorized oil colors. The phosphatides must be removed in refining and bleaching before the deodorization process. Some of the phosphatides and their associated metal complexes are not easily hydratable. These complexes require a phosphoric acid pretreatment for their removal in degumming or refining. The prebleach process removes the traces of soap and phosphatides remaining after the refining process. Oils that do reach the deodorizer with high phosphatide contents will have a darker color and a characteristic fishy odor after
592
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
deodorization. These products must be bleached and then redeodorized to salvage the oils. 3. Rework quality: A color problem, in most cases, can be corrected with rebleaching and redeodorization, or it may require blending at low levels with subsequent batches. In extreme cases, it may be necessary to sell it as off-quality product. The reclaiming method should be thoroughly evaluated before execution. 4. Secondary oxidation: Oils with severe oxidation abuse will develop a reddishorange color that will heat bleach readily; however, the secondary oxidation products must be removed with bleaching for oxidative and color stability. Identification of the cause of the oil abuse (probably aeration or overheating) and correction must be given top priority to prevent continuation of the problem, which requires additional processing and affects product quality. 5. Proteinaceous material: Meat fats containing proteinaceous material will turn black in the deodorizer. More effective filtering or water washing of meat fats is required to eliminate this problem. The charred protein material, developed in the deodorizer, can be removed with bleaching. 6. High-temperature air contact: Fats and oils must be protected from air incorporation throughout deodorization to prevent oxidation with attendant color development. Some of the potential air sources during deodorization are (1) air leaks in fittings below the product level, pumps, holes in the deodorizer shell, heaters, and coolers; (2) improper deaeration of the feedstock; and (3) stripping steam not generated from deaerated water and, thus, not oxygen free. 7. High discharge temperature: The oxidation rate for edible oils almost doubles with each 20°F rise in temperature. therefore, proper cooling of the oil before it exits the deodorizer is mandatory for oxidative stability, as evidenced by color, peroxide value, and flavor evaluations. 8. Low deodorizer temperature: The thermal treatment that is a necessary part of the deodorization process also heat bleaches the oil by destruction of carotenoids that are unstable at deodorization temperatures. Because the carotenoid pigments can be decomposed and removed at approximately 500°F (260°C), the high side of the normal deodorization temperatures — 400 to 525°F (200 to 274°C) — should deliver the heat bleach desired. However, the maximum deodorizer temperature that can be used must be limited because of the detrimental effect upon oil stability. 9. Oxidized tocopherols: α-Tocopherol oxidizes to a very colorful chromanquinone. The opportunities for oxidation must be evaluated and the cause eliminated for further production. The immediate product must be rebleached to remove the oxidized tocopherol and other secondary oxidation products. 10. Crude oil storage: Storage of crude oils in contact with atmospheric oxygen can cause oxidative damage, which is ultimately reflected in the quality of the processed oil. Vegetable oils with the lightest colors and the best oxidative stability are either processed immediately or protected with nitrogen immediately after extraction. 11. Phosphoric acid overdose: Oils are acid treated prior to bleaching to reduce the phosphorus content and chelate the trace metals. Phosphoric acid is usually less expensive and more effective than the alternative citric acid; however, it has been found to form compounds with the partial glycerides and carbohydrates in the oil that darken in the deodorizer. Additionally, it may be difficult to achieve the desired free fatty acid content, or the level of free fatty acid may rise rapidly during storage. These reactions are not experienced with citric acid until the treatment level is increased substantially.29
Troubleshooting
593
12. Color reduction: Color reduction in the deodorizer depends on the temperature and holding time at that temperature. Both color reduction and trans fatty acid development depend on temperature and time. There is little trans development at 220°C (248°F) but color removal to meet a 0.2 to 0.5 Lovibond red color requires higher deodorization temperatures. A red limit of 1.0 to 1.5 Lovibond red can be achieved at 220°C deodorization temperatures.
Problem: Rapid Peroxide Value Increase after Deodorization Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Inaccurate analysis: All laboratory utensils must be rinsed with distilled water to remove all traces of soap or detergent, which cause high peroxide value results. 2. Light exposure: The deleterious effects of light exposure on the flavor stability of edible oils is well known. Even limited exposure of the oil to sunlight or ultraviolet rays from fluorescent lightening will increase the peroxide value of the oil and impart off-flavors. Samples from any process should be protected from the light to ensure a representative analysis of the product. Clear glass or plastic containers should not be used to sample in-process oils. 3. Washed tanks: Process tanks must be rinsed with clear water, neutralized, and sweetened with an oil rinse after washing to remove all traces of soap or detergent. 4. Chelating acid addition: To chelate metals, 30 to 50 ppm citric acid or 10 ppm phosphoric should be added in the deodorizer cooling tray. Problems with acid addition may be caused by a broken or clogged addition line, an empty acid-supply tank, incorrect preparation of the acid solution, the system being shut off, or something similar. 5. Deodorizer discharge temperature: Rapid oxidation of deodorized oils must be avoided by controlling the oil temperature in the cooling stage before exposure to the atmosphere. Liquid oils high in polyunsaturates should be cooled from 100 to 120°F (38 to 49°C). Higher deodorizer discharge temperatures are necessary for higher melting products, but should be maintained as low as possible. The speed of oxidation is doubled with each 27°F (15°C) increase in temperature within the 70 to 140°F (20 to 60°C) interval. 6. Secondary oxidation: The immediate batch may be salvaged by rebleaching with bleaching earth followed by redeodorization; however, the source of the abuse should be identified to prevent a recurrence with subsequent production. 7. Air incorporation: Repair pumps or other sources of air incorporation after deodorization. 8. Polymerized oil buildup: Peroxide values increases can be caused by a buildup of polymerized or oxidized oil, which mixes with the oil in process. The corrective action is to wash the deodorizer. To prevent these problems from occurring, a regular washout schedule should be established. It should be standard procedure to wash the deodorizer every six months if it is not operated continuously seven days a week, or the operation is subject to power failures. Otherwise, deodorizers should not be operated more than 12 months without a thorough washout.30 9. Prior oxidation: It is very important that oxidation be prevented during all stages of edible fats and oils processing because of the detrimental effects on the finished deodorized oils. For example, it has been estimated that a peroxide value
594
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
increase of only 1.2 meq/kg in neutralized soybean oil after refining may reduce the oxidative stability of the deodorized oil by 50%.10 Oxidation during processing can be minimized by avoiding contact with air, elimination of prooxidant metallic contaminants, nitrogen protection at all stages of processing, or addition of antioxidants at the initial stages of processing.
Problem: High Loss Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Excessive blowing steam: A 15% increase in sparging steam will double the entrainment loss, and a 35% increase will result in a fourfold loss, therefore, maintaining the proper blowing-steam level is essential to controlling deodorizer entrainment losses. 2. Wet blowing steam: Make sure that the steam pressure to the deodorizer is within specified limits. 3. Wet oil: Dry wet oil before deodorization to control entrainment loss and evaluate the feedstock origin, and eliminate the moisture source for future production. 4. Charge or batch size: Ensure that the deodorizer charge or batch size does not exceed the capacity. 5. High free fatty acid feedstock: Determine and correct the upstream cause to avoid continued high losses. 6. Leaking drop valves: Timely maintenance is necessary to prevent or repair leaking valves that cause erratic temperature recording and overflowing deodorizer trays. 7. Leaking trays: An increase in the deodorizer shell drain indicates leaking trays that need repair.
Problem: Contamination with Another Product Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Mixing in the measuring tank: Blow the supply lines into the measuring tank, followed by evacuation of this vessel with the deodorizer vacuum to prevent product heels. 2. No empty trays between products (tray-type deodorizers): One or two empty trays should separate products that are somewhat similar. 3. No flush oil: Dissimilar products should be separated by flushing the system with a minimum of the first two trays of the new product. 4. Nonrepresentative sample: The sample line and valve must be thoroughly rinsed with the product to be sampled to remove all congealed, oxidized, or gummy deposits; the sample container must be absolutely clean; all products must be liquid when sampled; and the sample must be adequately identified by product and source to avoid sample confusion.
Problem: Reverted Oil Flavor After deodorization, certain oils develop objectionable flavors that may not be recognized as oxidative in nature. This flavor, representative of the original crude oil, has been described as reversion.
Troubleshooting
595
Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Air exposure: Oils containing linoleic and linolenic fatty acids are subject to flavor changes with minimal exposure to air or oxygen of less than 1.0%.31 2. Crude versus refined storage: Most edible oils, with the exception of cottonseed oil, store best in the crude state. Degummed crude soybean oil oxidizes more rapidly than nondegummed crude oil. Apparently, the phospholipids in crude oil provide an antioxidant function above that of the natural antioxidants or tocopherols. 3. Temperature control: The rate of oxidation or reversion is dependent on temperature. Evidently, oxygen will diffuse into and react with the oil faster at higher temperatures. The oxidation rate approximately doubles with each 20°F (11.1°C) temperature increase, therefore, the rule of utilizing a temperature that is only 10°F above the melting point of the product should be enforced to control reversion. 4. Nitrogen blanketing: Nitrogen blanketing of all tanks is an effective means of protecting edible fats and oils. Peroxide development and flavor instability can be virtually eliminated by keeping oxygen away from the oil at all stages of processing. Evaluations of soybean oil stored several months with and without nitrogen protection showed a decidedly more rapid flavor deterioration for the oil stored without nitrogen protection. 5. Phosphatide removal: Residual phosphatides will contribute to off-flavors and colors. Some of the phospholipids and their associated metal complexes are not easily hydratable. Removal of these complexes requires phosphoric acid pretreatment in degumming or refining. The prebleach process cleans up traces of soap and phosphatides remaining from the refining process. Problems will develop with the deodorized oil if the feedstock has a phosphatide content above 20 ppm. 6. Bleaching-earth filtration: Complete removal of the bleaching medium from the bleached oil is very important because residual earths can act as a prooxidant. The bleaching operation should be controlled with filterable impurity evaluations to ensure that the bleached oil transferred to storage or the next process is free of any contaminants that could decrease the oxidative stability. 7. Vacuum bleaching: The primary function of the bleaching process is to remove peroxides and secondary oxidation products. Secondarily, the process cleans up traces of soap and phosphatides remaining after the refining step and adsorption of color pigments. Vacuum bleaching is more effective than atmospheric bleaching. It usually requires less bleaching earth, operates at lower temperatures, and minimizes oxidation by reducing exposure to air and providing an opportunity to cool the oil before returning to atmospheric conditions.32 8. High peroxide value before deodorization: Contrary to most beliefs, no significant oxidation breakdown products are removed by deodorization; the only opportunity to remove them is during the bleaching process. The thermal decomposition of peroxides is complete with deodorization, but the rate of peroxide formation in the oil during subsequent storage is increased and the flavor stability of the finished oil is compromised. Rebleaching before deodorization, when the peroxide value has been allowed to increase, is necessary for adequate flavor stability.32 9. Deodorizer temperatures: Normally, deodorization temperatures range from 400 to 525°F (200 to 274°C). The deodorization process is time and temperature dependent; lower temperatures require longer times, and higher temperatures require shorter times. Even though elevated temperatures have a favorable effect on
596
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
deodorization efficiency, excessive temperatures are detrimental to flavor stability and trans fatty acid development. Twice as many tocopherols are stripped out of the oil at 525°F (275°C) as at 465°F (240°C). Trans fatty acid formation is negligible below 428°F (220°C), becomes significant between 428 and 464°F (220 and 240°C), and it is nearly exponential above 464°F (240°C).28 Therefore, for flavor stability and to prevent trans fatty acid formation, the lowest practical deodorization temperature should be utilized. 10. Reduced stripping-steam flow: Inability to maintain acceptable oil quality when the deodorizer temperature, vacuum, and feed rate appear normal may be caused by a reduced or restricted stripping-steam flow. It may be necessary to redrill the sparger holes if a boil-out does not correct the problem. 11. Avoid air contact: Fats and oils must be protected from exposure to air throughout deodorization. An oil reacts rapidly with oxygen at deodorizer temperatures with deleterious effects on flavors and oxidative stability. Potential air sources are (1) air leaks in fittings below the product level, in pumps, holes in the deodorizer shell, heaters, and coolers; (2) improper deaeration of the feedstock; and (3) stripping steam not generated from deaerated water and, thus, not oxygen free. 12. Chelating agent: Addition of citric acid (0.005 to 0.01% based on the weight of the oil) or phosphoric acid (0.001% based on the weight of the oil) before and after deodorization helps protect against oxidation and reversion. The acid inactivates the trace metals, particularly iron and copper, which may be present in the crude oil or picked up during processing. These acids decompose rapidly at temperatures above 300°F (150°C). The usual practice is to add the acid during the cooling stage in the deodorizer, during bleaching, and prior to caustic refining. Excessive amounts of phosphoric acid lead to the development of watermelon- or cucumbertype off-flavors, even with good oxidative stability results. 13. Antioxidant replacement: Fats and oils resist oxidation until the antioxidants are destroyed during the induction period or the interval when oxidation proceeds at a slow rate. After the antioxidant ceases to function as a free-radical terminator, a rapid increase in the rate of peroxide development occurs. Replacement of the destroyed antioxidants with tocopherols or synthetic compounds will significantly improve the oxidative stability of the oil. 14. Light exposure: The deleterious effects of light exposure on the flavor stability of edible oils is well known. Even limited exposure of the oil to sunlight or ultraviolet rays from fluorescent lightening will increase the peroxide value of the oil and impart off-flavors. Samples from any process should be protected from light to ensure a representative analysis of the product. Clear glass or plastic containers should not be used to sample oils in process. 15. Blend stocks before deodorization: Shortenings, margarines, and some salad oils are blends of two or more basestocks or oils to achieve the desired product characteristics. Blending of these stocks before deodorization, rather than after, minimizes the handling and storage of the deodorized oil. It also allows process control to determine if the product has been abused inadvertently. This practice also allows the product to be bleached prior to deodorization when needed for the removal of the secondary oxidation products. 16. Boiler water treatment: Additives to treat boiler water can provide puzzling flavor results.
Troubleshooting
597
Problem: Poor Deodorizer Vacuum Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Air leaks: Verification of air leaks can be accomplished with a drop test. This test is performed by closing the oil inlet and discharge line valves and then quickly shutting off the steam and water to the vacuum system. The vacuum may drop rapidly at this point, but it should stabilize at a value that must be above 20 inches for a valid test. Then the vacuum should be noted each hour to determine if the drop is within the limits identified by the deodorizer manufacturer. If the vacuum loss exceeds the design limits, tighten all piping connections, valve packing glands, and equipment flanges. If vacuum loss continues after these measures have been taken, the source of the leak may be identified with one of the following test methods: a. Soap detection test: Large leaks may be detected by painting all possible leak sources with a soapy water solution while the system is under 1.3-bar (20psig) air pressure. Bubbles should form at the leak points. Mark the leaks, release the pressure, purge the system with air, repair the leaks, restore the equipment and instruments, and then repeat the drop test to determine if the vacuum loss still exceeds the satisfactory rate. If so, smaller leaks can be identified with the next evaluation. b. Ammonia/sulfur dioxide test: Prepare the system by closing all valves, blind the vacuum system tailpipes, disconnect the vacuum gauges, and admit ammonia gas until the system pressure reaches 0.3 bar (5 psig) and then further to 1.3 bar (20 psig) with compressed air. Examine the system by directing a small stream of sulfur dioxide gas around all the possible leak points. White fumes indicate the presence of a leak. Mark the leaks, release the pressure, purge the system, and then repair the leaks.30 2. High-temperature condenser water: When the vacuum-system water is recirculated through a cooling tower, the average wet-bulb temperature is a parameter used for the system design. Cooling towers will cool water to within a few degrees of the wet-bulb temperature. Normally, the wet-bulb and the corresponding water temperature chosen will not be exceeded 1.0% of the time in the summer months; however, the oil quality must be closely monitored during the warm summer days when the warm condenser water prevents operation at the desired vacuum. 3. Other operational problems: Two other problems, in addition to those already reviewed, are (1) low steam pressure or wet steam to the vacuum jets, and (2) insufficient condenser water for one reason or another. Both of these conditions require maintenance or at least investigation to identify the source of the problem for corrective action and installation of preventive measures for the future. 4. Vacuum maintenance: If operational problems are not the cause of a poor vacuum, the steam nozzles, steam chests, and throat of the booster should be examined for wear. Replacement of the worn parts and adoption of a preventive maintenance program to regularly review the vacuum systems should help relieve the poor vacuum problems.
598
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Problem: Poor Steam-Ejector Operation Possible Causes and Corrective Actions33
1. Low steam pressure: This may be caused by clogging of the steam strainers or orifice plates with pipe scale or sediment, improper operation of the steam pressure regulating valve, or low boiler pressure. A steam pressure gauge for measuring the operating pressure should be installed at a point close to the ejector steam inlet in order to determine the true operating pressure. 2. Steam nozzles: In addition to the possibility of a nozzle clogging from pipe scale or dirt, a scale deposit might occur in the throats of the steam nozzles from impurities in the steam. When this occurs, it is necessary to clean out the nozzle with a proper size reamer or drill, taking care not to mar the internal surfaces. 3. Insufficient cooling water: The temperature of water entering and exiting the ejector condensers should be measured. If the temperature rise is not excessive, the cooling water supply is adequate and the source of the problem should be sought elsewhere. 4. High back pressure at ejector discharge: The pressure at the final stage exit should be measured. Excessive pressure indicates that the piping should be changed to reduce the discharge pressure. 5. Nozzle and diffuser wear: Operation of the ejectors with wet steam or corrosive gases or vapors will cause excessive wear and produce a rough wall surface. Periodic checks should be made to compare the throat diameter of the diffuser and nozzle with the original sizes to determine if replacement is required.
13.2.17 Antioxidant Addition Problem: Antioxidant Activity Possible Causes and Corrective Actions34-36
1. Incomplete dispersion: Dispersion problems may result from inadequate mixing equipment, poor mixing techniques, or shortcuts in procedures established for the antioxidant addition. Several acceptable addition methods are practiced, one of which is outlined below: a. The quantity of the batch must be large enough to allow adequate mechanical agitation; simply stated, the product must cover the agitator in the tank used for effective mixing. b. The temperature of the product must be maintained at least 10°F (5.6°C) above the melting point, but not so high that it allows oxidation before addition of the antioxidant. c. Determine the proper antioxidant quantity for the individual product and weigh antioxidants with a laboratory balance for each batch. d. Slurry the antioxidant in a portion of the product with vigorous mechanical agitation. e. Add the slurry to the agitating product tank at a temperature of 10°F (5.6°C) above the melting point of the product. f. Continue agitation of the batch for a minimum of 20 minutes before sampling.
Troubleshooting
599
g. Sample and obtain a positive qualitative antioxidant analysis before packaging or shipping in bulk quantities. 2. Vessel agitation: Addition of a concentrated antioxidant mixture before agitation begins will result in a high level of the additive in a portion of the product while the major portion has little or no antioxidant present. This practice will produce serious stability deficiencies for most of the product, and the very high concentration of antioxidant in the oil at the bottom of the vessel will result in performance problems. First and last piece product evaluations for packaged product should identify this problem. Tank truck or railcar products may indicate a negative antioxidant analysis for the as-shipped sample when the antioxidant is added to the shipper after loading of the oil product has been completed. 3. Improper antioxidant levels: Maximum antioxidant levels are defined by U.S. regulatory agencies. The allowed levels are generally recognized as the optimum for achieving good stability results. In general, successive additions of an antioxidant yield steadily diminishing returns. At higher concentrations, an appreciable portion of the antioxidant is consumed by side reactions and, thus, does not function as a free-radical terminator. In some cases, decomposition of the antioxidant may produce substances with a prooxidant action. 4. Antioxidant storage conditions: Proprietary antioxidant mixtures formulations are available from several suppliers. These mixtures vary in active ingredient contents and the solvent systems utilized to dissolve the antioxidant and keep them in solution until use. Separation or crystallization or other changes can occur if the products are handled improperly. Most antioxidant mixtures solidify at temperatures below 32°F (0°C), but the heating required to liquefy has no detrimental effect on antioxidant properties. Deterioration occurs when the antioxidants are heated above 200°F (93.3°C) for extended periods. 5. Incorrect antioxidants: Significant performance differences exist among the antioxidants in different source oils, processing, and handling conditions. Consideration of the antioxidant type or mixture formulation to be used must be made during product development. Substitutions of one antioxidant for another cannot be allowed because of performance and especially labeling requirements. Each individual synthetic antioxidant must be identified by the prescribed nomenclature in the ingredient statement on the label. 6. Addition stage: Natural and synthetic antioxidants are removed from edible oils during processing, notably refining, bleaching, and deodorization. Antioxidants can be added to oils at an early stage for protection, but it should be recognized that deodorization will destroy the antioxidants. In this case, the antioxidants will have to be added again after deodorization for oxidative protection. 7. Addition point: Antioxidants will not rejuvenate mistreated fats and oils products. Phenolic antioxidants function by inhibiting free-radical formation, the initial step in oil oxidation. Therefore, it is essential that the addition point occurs as soon as reasonably possible after deodorization before the autoxidation reaction has a chance to start. 8. Low antioxidant level: Analysis of the antioxidant level in the finished product will reveal a lower level than was actually added. The antioxidant level decreases as it functions to intercept oxygen before it can attack the fats and oils products. 9. Induction period: The initial period of relatively slow oxidation is called the induction period. Antioxidants prolong the induction period, but have no effect after
600
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
the end of the induction period. Once oxidation has started, the rate is as rapid as experienced with unprotected fats or oils. 10. Prior abuse: Edible fats and oils that have been allowed to oxidize significantly before deodorization will have a poor stability after deodorization. This is because of the formation of oxidation products, which are odorless and tasteless and carry through into the deodorized product where they initiate and propagate further oxidation. Antioxidant addition to these abused oil products will have little or no stabilizing effect. Antioxidants cannot reverse or terminate the autoxidative process after it has passed the early stages. 11. Tocopherols: Tocopherols, natural antioxidants, attain maximum effectiveness at comparatively low levels, roughly equivalent to their natural level of occurrence in vegetable oils. Tocopherol levels above the optimum concentration usually function as prooxidants.
13.2.18 Bulk Railroad Car or Truck Loading Problem: Impurities Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. No analysis: Evaluate each product load before the shipment is released and refilter each load that does not meet established limits followed by upstream evaluations to determine the cause for the impurities. 2. Poor sample: All trucks and cars should be zone-sampled after loading is completed, while the product is still liquid, to identify problems before shipment. Dip samples, which are easier to obtain, evaluate only the surface oil on the top of the tank. Impurities are normally heavier than oil and sink rapidly to the bottom of the tank. 3. Dirty sampler or container: All sampling apparatus must be cleaned before use to prevent contamination of the sample. 4. No inline filter: All loading lines should be equipped with inline filters to trap impurities caused by polymerization or scale that develops inside the transfer lines. 5. No filter element: Install proper element. The supervisor should ensure that all filters are being utilized properly. 6. Filter not used: Eliminate bypasses around filters. 7. Coarse filter element: Most loading filters should be 25 µm or less to effectively trap the impurities encountered. 8. Faulty filter element: Inspect the filter elements for holes and tears and replace when faulty. 9. Line blowing causing filter failure: Blow the line into a separate container or through another filter to avoid contamination of the oil shipment if nitrogen pressure damages the filter. 10. Dirty filter shell: impurities from the lid of the dirty filter element can fall off into the filter shell while the elements are being replaced, contaminating the next oil product being filtered, therefore, the internals of the filter should be cleaned and inspected each time the filter element is replaced.
Troubleshooting
601
11. Dirty truck or car: All trucks and cars should be physically inspected just before loading, and those found dirty should be cleaned before use. 12. Open hatch: The loading hatch opening should be covered to prevent insects and other airborne impurities from contaminating the oil product. 13. Line from the inline filter to the truck or car: Install a filter element or “sock” on the end of the loading line to trap any scale from this section of the loading line. Use a lint-free material for any “sock” arrangement to avoid contamination of the oil with the filter devise. 14. Loose or open hatches: Close all openings tightly and seal to prevent contamination from airborne impurities.
Problem: Railcar Handling Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Cleaning: Tank cars should be cleaned and inspected thoroughly after return and before loading with another product. Physical inspection of the inside of the railcar is required to ensure that the tank is completely clean and dry and is free of dirt, rust, scale, and any possible infestation. 2. Soap residue: All railcars washed with soap must be rinsed thoroughly to ensure that a soap residue will not contaminate the next product loaded. Evaluation of the rinse water to determine alkalinity will ensure that the rail car has been rinsed adequately. 3. Broken coils: Rail cars are equipped with internal or external coils for heating the product at destination. The internal coils have a tendency to rupture during transit from “humping” by the railroad or after freezing if not properly drained of condensate in cold weather. Oil exiting from the coil outlet valve when uncapped is an indicator that the coil has been broken. Steaming through a broken coil contaminates the oil product with moisture and impurities from the heating coils. Railcars are equipped with two independent sets of coils, and a switch from the broken coil to the other set most times results in trouble-free heating for unloading. Each time a car is returned, it should be checked for heating-coil leaks with air pressure and blown free of moisture as a precaution against freezing. 4. Insulated railcars: Insulated railcars have external heating coils that eliminate the broken coil problem, but the insulation qualities can cause quality problems from residual heat. Sometimes, the products loaded do not lose the heat applied for loading for more than a week, depending on the outside temperatures. Accelerated oxidation from the extended high temperatures, an unprotected atmosphere, and agitation from the car movement can result in products with high red colors, peroxide values, and off-flavors. Strict adherence to the rule of thumb to keep the fats no warmer than necessary to facilitate handling with pumps — usually 10°F (5.6°C) above the melting point of the product — or shipment by another means is necessary to deliver quality products under these circumstances. 5. Impurities: Even with very conscientious inspections for cleanliness, products have arrived at customers’ locations with unacceptable impurities in the product. One of the major causes of these impurities is the internal coils. Polymerized oil that has collected below the coils or on the coil supports has a tendency to flake off
602
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
with movement during heating, contaminating the current product. Oil deliveries of bulk edible products should be filtered at the receiving point to collect as much of the impurities as possible. 5. Aeration: The loading line should not allow the heated liquid product to cascade or fall through the air into the railcar. The desirable procedure is to fill the railcar from the bottom with subsurface entry to avoid splashing and excessive exposure of the oil, which accelerates oxidation. 7. Dome hatch cover: The hatch opening allowing entry of the loading line should be fitted with a temporary cover to prevent contamination from insects, rain, dust, and other airborne pollutants while product is being loaded. This cover will also protect the oil from direct sunlight. 8. Unloading procedures: The purchaser of edible oils in railcars must use proper procedures to prepare the product for unloading to protect the product quality. Two important product heating requirements are a. Steam pressure: It is very easy to overheat or cause localized scorching of the oil; to avoid these problems, steam pressure should be limited to 0.7 bar (10 psig). This pressure provides a steam temperature of 240°F (115.6°C). b. Agitation: Agitation of the heated product should begin as soon as possible. Two methods of agitation are (1) recirculate the melted product by pumping from the bottom outlet back into the car through the dome, avoiding aeration by extending the line at least halfway to the bottom of the car; or (2) agitate the product with a portable agitator, which can be lowered through the dome to extend into the melted product. 9. Car heels: All empty railcars returned must be visually inspected for product heels left by the customer. The heel might be caused by incomplete melting, sloping of the unloading track, deliberate incomplete unloading, or some other reason. Removal of the heel may require using a squeegee to direct the residual oil into the outlet line or the addition of heated oil with agitation to melt the product for removal. 10. Railcar service: Individual railcars should be dedicated to a particular type service: deodorized, undeodorized, or crude oils. Changing service from a deodorized oil to a crude oil does not present a real problem; however, the reverse can cause oxidation and impurity problems for several trips, even after caustic washing. Such a service change probably requires complete cleaning, including sandblasting to avoid quality problems. 11. Railcar inspections: A formal checklist identifying the critical areas to be inspected before and after each railcar is loaded for shipment should include: a. All interior surfaces must be thoroughly dry and free of all dirt, scale, and any possible infestation. b. Top hatch covers and gaskets must be inspected to ensure cleanliness and to confirm that they are free from infestation, are undamaged, and seal properly. c. Valves should be operational, leak free, and closed tightly. d. All exterior openings should be clean, capped, or otherwise protected from contamination during transit. e. The top exterior must be clean and free from product, dirt, and other foreign material both before and after loading. f. All hatches and external openings must be closed and secured with registered seals.
Troubleshooting
603
13.2.19 Oil Filling and Packaging Problem: Impurities Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Dirty drums: Each drum should be inspected with a light to identify rust or other impurities before filling. 2. Dirty smaller containers: Inspection of empty product containers at receipt should be followed by air cleaning at the filling line. 3. Filter failure: Analysis of representative samples and continuous visual online operator inspection of clear containers should prevent excessive rework. The filter elements should be changed when the filter pressure exceeds a predetermined level as a preventive measure. 4. Dirty equipment: The filling equipment should be kept clean at all times to prevent contamination of the food product.
Problem: Weight Control Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Dirty scales and weights: All equipment should be kept clean and calibrated frequently to ensure proper control; also, the quality-check weigher should use separate equipment to identify line equipment problems. 2. Oil temperature: Fluctuations in oil temperature will cause over- and underfilling, which should be controlled by an inline heat exchanger to provide the optimum oil temperature. 3. Fluctuating filler-nozzle pressure: The filler oil supply should be from a clean, constant-head surge tank. 4. Wrong tare weights: The container tare weights should be reestablished frequently to ensure that the proper weight is being used. Individual containers must be tared before filling for accurate determination of fill weights.
Problem: Poor Flavor Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Overheating the oil: Temperature controllers should be used to control the storagetank temperatures and avoid overheating. The heating surface should never produce surface temperatures above 250°F (121°C). Exposure to these higher temperatures tends to scorch the oil products and quality deteriorates. 2. Oil aeration: Identify the source of the aeration and repair or discontinue the poor practice. Potential sources are pumps, oil free-fall into the tank, agitation, blowing the lines with air, recirculation, and so on. 3. Light exposure: Even limited exposure of the oil to sunlight or ultraviolet rays from fluorescent lighting will increase the peroxide value and impart off-flavors.
604
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Oils at all stages of processing should be protected from light. Clear glass or plastic containers should not be used to sample or store oils in process. 4. Allowing the oil to stand in lines or unprotected surge tanks: Blow all lines with nitrogen and empty all surge tanks when not operating. 5. Nonrepresentative sample: The sample line and valve must be flushed with the product to be sampled to remove all oxidized or gummy deposits, and the sample container must be absolutely clean. 6. Poor filler-cleaning practices: Clean the filler equipment frequently and thoroughly, ensuring that no soap or other residue is left on areas that could contact the product. 7. No nitrogen protection: The oil should be nitrogen protected immediately after deodorization and continually through packaging to prevent oxygen occultation. Dissolved oxygen in the oil will react with the oil, causing oxidation, which shortens the shelf life of the product. 8. High headspace oxygen content: The package headspace should contain less than 2% oxygen to prevent excessive oxidation before purchase. 9. Chelating agent omission: Citric or phosphoric acid should be added to deodorized oil before filtration to trap the trace metals that accelerate oxidation. 10. Dissolved oxygen: The dissolved oxygen level should be 1.0% maximum. Higher levels indicate that the deodorized oil has not been nitrogen protected and aerated at some point before filling. Dissolved oxygen will accelerate oxidation, which causes off-flavors. 11. Product heel: Fresh product should not be added to heels of previous lots. The older product can contain concentrations of oxidized products that will accelerate oxidation of the fresh product. Entire lots should be packaged to eliminate heels, or the remaining product must be recycled back to processing for adequate control.
Problem: Packaging Rate Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Oil temperature: The speed of filling and weight control are dependent largely upon the temperature of the oil. If the oil exceeds the specified limits, the container may overflow or cause a slowdown in filling speed to prevent overflow. If the oil is cold, the filling rate may be increased because of an increased headspace in the filled container and, consequently, less danger of oil spurting over the sides with rapid filling rates. An inline heat exchanger should be utilized to control the fill temperature for the best performance.
13.2.20 Packaged Liquid Oils: Storage and Transportation Problem: Cloudy Oil Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Storage temperature: Exposure of liquid oils to cold temperatures will cause the oils to cloud. The degree of solidification will depend on the exposure time and the resistance of a particular oil to cold temperatures. Oils that are not natural
Troubleshooting
605
winter oils or have not been winterized or dewaxed will cloud rapidly at refrigerator temperatures of 40°F (14.4°C) and below. Liquid oils should be stored in temperature-controlled warehouses in the winter months to avoid crystallization of the hard fractions. 2. Shipping temperature: Liquid oils should never be shipped in mixed loads when the other products require refrigeration. Additionally, temperature-controlled trucks and railcars are necessary to prevent clouding of liquid oils in the winter months. 3. Heating to clarify: Liquid oils may be clarified by controlled gentle heating if the solidification has not progressed too far. In some cases, the oils will clarify when heated, but then a portion of the hard fraction will reappear when the oil is cooled to room temperature. In other cases, it may be necessary to heat the oil to quite high temperatures, 140°F (60°C) to melt the hard fraction that has developed. 4. Wet oil: Water in amounts greater than 0.05 to 0.15% cause a turbid oil at refrigerator temperatures. Wet oils must be dried by deodorization or vacuum drying to avoid hydrolysis and clouding.
13.2.21 Shortening Packaging Problem: Mettler Dropping Point Change after Pumping Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Pumping error: Blow air or nitrogen through the empty lines before actually pumping the product to ensure that it is lined up properly. 2. Faulty valve allowing the product to deliver to more than one location: Locating the valve requiring repair should be simplified by using Mettler dropping point results. The product with the change is probably in the tank with the faulty valve or at least the problem is with a valve that lines up with this tank. 3. Sample identification error: Determine the correct product identification by resampling, performing other fingerprint analyses, or checking transfer records. The sample identification tag should require both the product specification number and the batch number as well as the tank number for possible errors of this type. 4. Nonrepresentative sample: The sample line and valve must be flushed with the product to be sampled to remove all previous product residue, and the sample container must be clean. If a poor sample is suspected, resampling is necessary. 5. Cool tank temperature: The product temperature should be 10°F above the melting point before sampling to obtain a representative sample. 6. Nonuniform product: Shortening, even if held 10°F (5.6°C) above the melting point, can stratify or separate to provide a sample that is not representative of the entire product. Tanks must be agitated for a minimum of 20 minutes before sampling to ensure product uniformity. 7. Normal method variation: AOCS Method Cc 18-80 indicates that the expected variation within a laboratory for the Mettler dropping point result is 0.7°C. 8. Emulsifier additions: Lecithin, mono- and diglycerides, and other emulsifier additions will change the Mettler dropping point results, which should be reflected in the product specification requirements.
606
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Problem: Peroxide Value Increase Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Overheating: High-temperature storage before packaging will accelerate oxidation. The rate of oxidation for edible oils at least doubles with each 20°F (11.1°C) increase in temperature. Storage tank holding temperatures should be adjusted to no higher than 10°F (5.6°C) above the melting point of the product. An abnormal peroxide value increase should be investigated thoroughly before packaging, even if the result is still within specified limits. It may be necessary to rebleach and redeodorize the product to restore oxidative stability to an abused product. 2. Chelating agent omission: Citric or phosphoric acid should be added to deodorized oil before filtration to remove trace metals that accelerate oxidation, as evidenced by the peroxide value increase. 3. Aeration: Potential sources for air incorporation into the oil should be inspected and repaired or any poor practice identified should be discontinued. 4. Nonrepresentative sample: The sample line and valve must be flushed thoroughly with the product to be sampled to remove oxidized and polymerized residues from previous samplings. Additionally, the sample container must be free from any soap or detergent residues. 5. Light-struck sample: Even limited exposure of a shortening product to sunlight or ultraviolet rays from fluorescent lighting will increase peroxide value results and decrease flavor ratings. Samples determining the quality of product must be protected from light abuse to avoid inaccurate results. Transparent or open containers should not be used to obtain or store samples to be analyzed. 6. Secondary oxidation: A rapid rise in peroxide value with an accompanied orange color may be a result of secondary oxidation. The source of the abuse causing the problem probably was overheating, perhaps accompanied by aeration at an earlier stage after bleaching. Rebleaching and redeodorization might salvage this product; however, the oil will probably never regain the level of oxidative stability it had before it was abused. 7. Dirty glassware: A soap or detergent residue will give a false high peroxidevalue result. All laboratory glassware and washed sample containers should be rinsed thoroughly with distilled water to remove soap films. High peroxide-value results should be rechecked, especially if several other products are also indicating high values. 8. Laboratory reagent problem: Normally, all products tested from all process areas will have high peroxide value results if this problem exists. Replacing the reagent with a new lot in a single laboratory situation or performing duplicate analysis in another laboratory should determine if a reagent problem exists. 9. Localized overheating: Good agitation while heating shortening in storage tanks prevents localized overheating. When steam coils are used to heat a storage tank without agitation, extreme localized heating of the oil near the coils occurs while the overall temperature rises slowly. Consequently, the damage to the oil near the coils affects the stability of all the oil in the tank. 10. Heating-surface temperature: The heating devices used should not provide surface heat above 250°F (121°C). Exposure to higher temperatures tends to scorch fats and oils products, and quality deteriorates.
Troubleshooting
607
Problem: Free Fatty Acid Increase Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Nonrepresentative sample: The sample line and valve must be flushed with the product to be sampled to remove any traces of the previous product sampled, which may have had a high free fatty acid caused by emulsifiers or some other requirement. 2. Antioxidant addition: Antioxidant mixture additions will increase the level of free fatty acid of the product. Process specifications should recognize this increase and should allow a higher free fatty acid result after this addition. Doing so will require a lower level of free fatty acid from the deodorizer if the final limit cannot be increased because of performance or customer requirements. 3. Colorant addition: Highly colored oils interfere with the visual endpoint determination for the free fatty acid analysis. Either a higher result must be allowed or the final analysis must be performed before the color addition. 4. Emulsifier addition: The free fatty acid level of most emulsifiers far exceeds the 0.05% normally specified for a nonemulsified shortening. The addition level and effect should be a consideration when the product specified limits are being established. The free fatty acid increase can also be used as a quick indicator of the level of emulsifier added before the emulsifier analytical results are available. 5. Identification error: A high free fatty acid result could be the result of a mix-up in samples or identification tags. All samples should be identified with the specification, batch, and tank number to help determine the correct product identification; however, any sample in doubt should be resampled and reanalyzed. 6. Carbon dioxide in nitrogen gas: CO2 will give a false high free fatty acid result. This problem can be identified by drawing a vacuum on the sample to remove all gases and retesting. If CO2 contamination exists, the deaerated sample will test normal. The CO2 source should be identified and the problem corrected. 7. Wet oil: One cause of free fatty acid development is hydrolysis. Moisture in the oil will naturally accelerate this reaction; therefore, all fats and oil products should be “dry” when packaged. 8. Pumping error: Either transferring the product to the wrong tank or inadvertently adding to another product through a faulty valve can provide a different free fatty acid result than expected. A lower free fatty acid should cause as much concern after a transfer as an increase; either change can indicate a problem that requires investigation. 9. Excess chelating agent: Citric and phosphoric acid will catalyze free fatty acid development when added in too high of quantities: over 50 ppm citric and over 10 ppm phosphoric acid. The addition of the chelating agents after deodorization must be controlled to prevent catalyzation of the free fatty acid.
Problem: Color Increase Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Overheating: High-temperature storage before packaging will accelerate oxidation with an attendant color rise. The oxidation rate for edible oils at least doubles with
608
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
each 27°F (15°C) increase in temperature in the 68 to 140°F (20 to 60°C) range. The holding temperature of all storage tanks should be adjusted to no higher than 10°F (5.6°C) above the melting point of the product. An increase in the color of the product should be investigated thoroughly before packaging, even if the result is still within specified limits. It may be necessary to rebleach and redeodorize the product to restore the oxidative stability to an abused product. 2. Colorant added: Color added to a shortening product, either on purpose or by mistake, will increase the color determination. If the product tested does not require an added color, it probably was added to the wrong tank by mistake. Normally, colorants can be removed by heat bleaching during deodorization, but some may require bleaching as well. 3. Dark emulsifier added: Many emulsifiers are darker in color than a deodorized shortening product, thus the color requirements should be adjusted when the product limits are developed to allow for the resultant increase. 4. Aeration: Oxidation caused by aeration of the fat and oil product is evidenced by a darker red color, as well as an increase in peroxide value and flavor degradation. Potential equipment failures or poor practices should be identified and repaired or discontinued. 5. Secondary oxidation: The development of an orange color with a high peroxide value is an indication of oxidatively abused product. The source of the problem was probably overheating or aeration at some stage after bleaching. This product may be salvaged by rebleaching with a bleaching earth to remove the secondary oxidation materials; however, the oxidative stability of this product will probably never regain its original level of resistance. 6. Identification error: Specified color limits vary for individual products on the basis of the source oil, additives, and other considerations. Therefore, an identification error can indicate that a product is completely outside the specified limits when it actually is within the limits, and that it is within specified limits when it is not. Each sample should be identified with the product specification and batch number as well as the tank number sampled to reduce identification errors. 7. Emulsified shortenings: Iron oxides are soluble in monoglyceride and many other emulsifiers. Rust from black iron equipment will be more readily absorbed by emulsified shortenings, which will affect the product’s color and oxidative stability. Black iron surfaces should always have an oil film on the surface to prevent rust.26 8. Pumping errors: Product color may indicate a pumping error if the color change is considerably different. The oil pumper should check the alignment by blowing from the delivery point to the receiving tank before the product is pumped. 9. Nonrepresentative sample: The sample line and valve must be flushed thoroughly with the product to be sampled before the sample is obtained in a clean container. In this case, the sample valve and line probably have residues from the previous sample obtained which could have oxidized or polymerized since the last sample was obtained, causing a nonrepresentative sample of the current product. Any indication of a sampling problem should be double-checked with another sample. 10. Cloudy sample: The sample must be completely melted and clear to obtain a reproducible color determination. Evaluation of cloudy samples provides an invalid color result. 11. Laboratory technician variation: Lovibond® color determinations are determined by matching the sample color visually with colored glasses by each individual technician and is a subjective evaluation at best unless an automatic tintometer
Troubleshooting
609
is utilized. Some technicians have more difficulty determining color values than others, which can be the source of apparent product color changes. All technicians should be tested to determine their ability to determine color differences. Because approximately 8% males and 0.4% females suffer from varying degrees of color blindness, some technicians may have defective color vision.37 12. Chelating agent omission: A metal scavenger should be added immediately after deodorization to remove trace metals, which accelerate the oxidation of fats and oils products. Color darkening and peroxide value increases are indications of oxidation. 13. Localized overheating: Agitation is necessary while heating shortenings in storage tanks to prevent localized overheating. When steam coils are used to heat a tank without agitation, extreme localized heating of the oil near the coils occurs while the overall temperature rises slowly; however, the extreme damage to the oil near the coils adversely affects the stability of all the oil in the tank, which probably results in a higher color and peroxide value.
Problem: Wet Oil Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Leaking cooling coils: The cooling and heating coils in tanks should be checked for leaks by pressurizing on a regular basis and especially when high moistures are identified by laboratory analysis. 2. Line steaming: Transfer lines allowed to set up with hard oils are frequently steamed to melt the solidified product. These lines must be flushed thoroughly with fresh product to remove any traces of moisture.
Problem: Shortening Consistency Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. In-package heat rise: The temperature rise in the container, due to heat of crystallization, should not be more than l or 2°F (0.6 to 1.1°C). Increases above this level are indicative of substantial crystallization under static conditions and can cause: (1) a firmer consistency than desired, (2) melted shortening in the center of the package, (3) low creaming gas or nitrogen content, (4) resolidified appearance, and (5) dark color. The revolutions per minute and holding time in the worker unit should be evaluated to correct this discrepancy. 2. Shortening picking: Too little working or “picking” after chilling develops a shortening that is sloppy as it emerges from the filling spout, experiences a high in-package temperature rise, sets up very rapidly, and becomes hard. Too much picking results in a shortening that fills sloppily, but sets up very slowly, with little temperature rise in the package. Ideal picking normally occurs between these two extremes, unless either of these conditions is desired for the individual product processed. 3. Precrystallization: Sandy, lumpy, or riced plasticized shortenings or margarines are symptoms of precrystallization. Product crystallization prior to chilling can be caused by a low supply-tank temperature, a low precooler temperature, or insufficient melting of the recirculated product.
610
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
4. Postcrystallization: Consistency problems can be caused by postcrystallization immediately after the product has exited the chilling unit and filled because of insufficient cooling, working, or crystallization time. Excessive postcrystallization results in products that are too firm or brittle, with poor spreadability or workability. The time required for supercooled fat to transform from the α- to β′-crystal form is the crystallization time. Different source oils crystallize at different rates due to the triglyceride composition. Crystallization time can be measured by observation of the lapsed time after cooling to the crystallization point and when crystals form. Product throughput is a major key to control postcrystallization, along with cooling temperatures and working. 5. Crystallization rate: The crystallization rate of the shortening blend affects the equipment requirements and the processing parameters to achieve a satisfactory product. The crystal lattice may not be formed in sufficient time if the blend is prone to extreme supercooling. This may cause the product to set up firmer than desired. Palm oil blends have been found to require a slowly agitated working unit between the chilling units to provide a residence time of two to three minutes for crystallization to occur.
Problem: Plasticized Shortening Faults Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Streaking: Streaks in plasticized shortening can be caused by (1) chilling too low for the operating back pressure; (2) erratic creaming gas dispersion; (3) channeling, which allows semiliquid oil to pass through the chilling unit without being chilled properly; (4) mixing different chilling-unit streams operating at different temperatures; (5) erratic chilling-unit pressures; (6) low feedstock temperature, allowing precrystallization; and (7) low pressure at the filler, allowing a loss of creaming gas. 2. Sandy: Small lumps about the size of grains of sand or larger can be caused by chilling-unit temperatures that are too cold or precrystallization of the product before the chilling unit. This consistency fault is described as ricing when larger, translucent, hard particles develop. 3. Ribby: Alternating very thin layers of hard and soft product, described as feeling like corduroy cloth, are evidence of ribby shortening. This condition can be caused by (1) chilling-unit temperature that is too cold with low pressure, (2) mixing streams from two or more chilling units operating at different temperatures, or (3) fill temperatures that are too cold, causing excessive mounding in the package. 4. Puffy: A soft plasticized shortening with large visible air cells or pockets that offer very little resistance when worked is caused by a high creaming gas content or back pressure that is too low to finely distribute the air cells, or a combination of the two conditions. 5. Brittle: A brittle feel is contributed by (1) warm chilling unit temperatures, (2) either the absence or less than required working after chilling, (3) the product formulation has a narrow plastic range, or (4) low creaming gas content. 6. Gray cast: Changes in the crystal structure brought about by high-temperature exposure may result in a gray cast. 7. Oil separation: Free oil in a plasticized shortening is caused by: (1) chilling temperature being too warm, (2) precrystallization of the product before entering the
Troubleshooting
611
chilling unit, (3) temperature abuse after packaging, (4) formulation with insufficient hardstock or source oils for the wrong crystal habit, or (5) too low chilling unit and filler back pressure. 8. Chalky: A dull, white appearance caused by too high of a creaming gas content. 9. Vaselated: A yellowish, clear, greasy appearance is typical of shortenings packaged without creaming gas, identified as being Vaseline®-like or having a greasy appearance. 10. Specks: Visible specks will appear in the finished shortening when the storage tank contains impurities or the inline filter is faulty. Also, heating of “frozen” or setup lines with a flame will polymerize and char the product to produce specks that can continue to contaminate products for extended periods of time. 11. Rubbery lard: Lard tempered at 70 to 85°F (21.1 to 29.4°C) for 48 hours develops a plastic, rubbery consistency; conversely, immediate refrigeration after packaging produces a loosely structured and brittle consistency. 12. Too dark: The whiteness of a plasticized shortening is affected by the creaming gas amount and degree of dispersion; however, increasing the creaming gas content will not materially affect an oil that has a dark color before plasticization. 13. Too soft: A product that is softer than expected can be caused by (1) a cool chill unit outlet temperature, (2) lower SFI results than specified, (3) the wrong composition, (4) contamination with another product, or (5) too much working after chilling. 14. Too firm: A harder than expected plasticized shortening consistency can be caused by (1) a high chill unit outlet temperature, (2) higher SFI results than specified, (3) wrong composition, (4) contamination with another product, or (5) insufficient working after chilling, as indicated by an in-package temperature rise of more than 2°F (1.1°C). 15. Appearance: Blue plastic liners are normally used for shortenings to help make the plasticized product appear whiter. Different color liners alter the visual perception and make the shortening appear less white. 16. Slack or overfilled containers: Faulty or erratic creaming gas control can be the cause of this condition if the product fill weights are adjusted properly. 17. Poor aeration: Hydrophilic surfactants can only be dispersible in fats and oils because they are not soluble in oil. These emulsifiers will separate from the liquid oils without good agitation and should be added just before plasticization. Nonuniform dispersion will also result in an off-flavor for a portion of the plasticized shortening (i.e., bittersweet).
13.2.22 Liquid Opaque Shortenings Problem: Separation Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Aeration: Air incorporation in liquid shortening promotes product separation and thickening. Storage studies indicate that an air content of less than 1.0% is necessary for a stable suspension. Sources of liquid shortening aeration during processing include: (1) pumps sucking air, (2) agitation causing a vortex that whips air into the product, (3) nonpressurized filler, (4) product freefall into a tank or packaging container, or (5) skipping the deaeration process.
612
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
2. High temperature: Exposure of the product to temperatures above 95°F (35°C) will result in partial to complete melting of the suspended solids, causing separation. Complete melting and reprocessing are required to restore the product to the original opaque, creamy, pumpable product.
Problem: Thick Product Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. β′ hardstock: The small, needle-shaped, β′-crystals pack together into dense, finegrained structures that cause the product to thicken. The large, coarse, self-occluding β-crystals contribute the product consistency desired for liquid shortenings. 2. Cold temperature: Liquid opaque shortenings will solidify at storage temperatures below 65°F (18°C) with a loss of fluidity. This solidification and fluidity loss can be reversed by controlled heating, not to exceed the melting point of the product. 3. High air content: An air content of 1.0% or less can cause liquid opaque shortenings to thicken and separate. Quality evaluations indicating high air content should initiate immediate actions to identify the aeration source to eliminate a continuing recurrence with succeeding batches. The problem batch of liquid shortening will require remelting to deaerate, followed by recrystallization. 4. Commingling: Liquid shortening contamination with another product normally results in a thick product. Pumping errors or pick-up from previous product in tanks, lines, and processes are the usual causes for commingling. Most of the other products processed are firmer or have a β′-crystal that contributes to thicker liquid shortenings.
Problem: Thin Product Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Hardstock level: The hardstock level in opaque liquid shortening has a direct effect upon the consistency or viscosity of the crystallized product. The product becomes more viscous as the hardstock level is increased, with all other variables kept constant. A uniform viscosity product should be produced batch after batch when the hardstock level is maintained within the tolerance levels determined acceptable by product design. 2. Hardstock iodine value: The hardstock added to an opaque liquid shortening is the seed for crystallization and has an effect upon the final consistency of the liquid shortening. Lower-iodine-value hardstocks will induce more rapid and complete crystallization than higher-iodine-value products. 3. Basestock hardness: The melting point and SFI results materially affect the consistency or viscosity of opaque liquid shortenings. As the basestock melting point increases, the product becomes more viscous or thicker. 4. Temperature: Opaque liquid shortening viscosity or consistency is temperature dependent. Thin products are experienced at high temperatures and thicker products at cooler temperatures. Extended periods at high temperatures will cause product melting and separation with a very thin top layer. 5. Separation: A portion of a separated product will be thin with the hard fraction settled to the bottom if temperature abuse is sufficient to completely break the product.
Troubleshooting
613
Separation due to aeration usually begins in the center of the product or where a container shoulder traps the air that escapes from the product. It looks like a crack in the product. This crack or separated streak grows with time to eventually divide the product into liquid and hard fractions.
Problem: Poor Flavor Stability Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Liquid oil adjustment: Liquid shortening batches that are firmer than specified should not be adjusted with any softer basestock than those specified in the composition. The flavor stability is dependent on the weakest component in the composition, thus adjustments with a basestock containing higher polyunsaturates will cause a reduction in flavor stability. 2. High precrystallization temperature: High-temperature storage before crystallization can promote oxidation to the point at which packaged product will revert in flavor and develop a pinkish yellow color quickly. The oxidation rate for edible oils at least doubles with each 20°F (11.1°C) increase in temperature. An abnormal peroxide value increase or off-flavor indication from the crystallization supply tank should be investigated thoroughly before the product is packaged. Rebleaching followed by redeodorization will be required to restore oxidative stability to an abused product. 3. Aeration before crystallization: Liquid shortenings must be protected from air throughout the system, even though a deaeration step is part of the crystallization process. Liquid oils react quickly at elevated temperatures with atmospheric oxygen and revert in flavor. Some of the potential air sources include: (1) air leaks in fittings, pumps, and flanges; (2) agitator use before it has been properly covered with product, thus creating a vortex; (3) blowing lines with air into the product; and (4) oil freefall into the tank. 4. Peroxide value increase: Analysis indicating a higher than expected peroxide value increase before packaging could be an indicator of secondary oxidation. If the oil product has been heat abused or improperly bleached, the oxidative stability may be substantially poorer than dictated by product requirements. Unexplained peroxide value increases indicate a reduced oxidative stability, which will be confirmed by accelerated stability evaluations, flavor reversion, and product discoloration. 5. Localized overheating: Good agitation during heating in storage tanks before crystallization prevents localized overheating. When steam coils are used to heat a storage tank without agitation, extreme localized heating of the oil near the coils occurs while the overall temperature rises slowly. Consequently, damage to the oil near the coils affects the stability of all the oil in the tank. Rebleaching followed by redeodorization may be required to reestablish the necessary oxidative stability.
Problem: Crystallization Product Aeration Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Deaeration process step: The first stage in many liquid opaque shortening crystallization processes is a deaeration step. This process should eliminate any air trapped in the liquid oil before crystallization. An air-content analysis should be
614
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
required for termination of this process stage because it may be the most likely shortcut taken to save time. Entrained air allowed to remain in the product can only increase from this point to potentially require a repeat of the crystallization process or cause customer displeasure with a thick, viscous product. 2. Agitation: Care must be exercised during crystallization of liquid opaque shortenings to avoid whipping air into the product through improper agitation in the crystallization tank. Creation of whirlpools or vortexes must be avoided because they draw air into the product. 3. Product freefall: Liquid opaque shortening products should not be allowed to cascade or fall through the air into crystallization or storage tanks or into packaging. The most desirable procedure is to fill both the tanks and packages from the bottom with subsurface entry. 4. Air-content control: Some pourable liquid shortening processes incorporate a deaeration step just before packaging. Percent air analysis determines the effectiveness of these processes. This analysis is also applicable to determine the acceptability of other processes. Storage studies have indicated that an air content of less than 1.0% is necessary to maintain the suspension stability of a liquid opaque shortening.
13.2.23 Shortening Flakes Problem: Flake Lumping Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Heat of crystallization: Shortening flakes packaged immediately after solidification on a chill roll can experience a heat of crystallization rise high enough to partially melt some of the product, causing lumping. Refrigerated air cooling of the flakes before packaging can effectively remove the heat of crystallization, which promotes product lumping. 2. Low chill-roll temperature: Low chill-roll temperatures can result in “shock” chilling, which causes the oil film against the roll to solidify rapidly and pull away, thus providing insulation from further cooling. In this condition, the outside surface of the flake remains liquid, creating a wet flake that will fuse with others to create lumps in the package. 3. Low oil-to-roll temperature: Oil that appears milky or grainy, indicating a low temperature, will not solidify properly on the roll. The flakes produced will appear wet or oily on one side, which will cause the flakes to fuse together in the package. The oil must be heated above the melting point and have a clear appearance, indicating the absence of solids when applied to the roll. 4. Filling-chute construction: The filling chute or any other enclosed passage for the flakes should be constructed of smooth material without corners or crevices where flakes could accumulate and fuse together. These lumps will fall into the package unnoticed until the customer finds them. Additionally, any enclosed areas should be accessible for cleaning on a regular basis. 5. Fast roll speed: The chill roll should have a variable speed for production of the various shortening flake and chip products. The roll speed should be adjusted to produce dry flakes each time the product type is changed.
Troubleshooting
615
6. Packaging: The usual packaging materials used with shortening flakes or chips are multiwall, natural brown Kraft bags or corrugated cases with liners. Both types of packages can become good insulators that hold and cause further elevation of the product’s temperature: a. Bags: Several styles of Kraft bags are available with and without square bottoms. Some bag types stack together more flatly and tightly than do others, with little or no free space between layers to allow the heat to dissipate. Partial melting from the nondissipated heat of crystallization and compression from the weight of the top layers on a pallet promote flake clumping. The use of this package requires cooling after flaking to remove the heat of crystallization and prevent fusion of the flakes. b. Corrugated case and liner packaging: The case provides less insulation than bag packaging. Some headspace will occur after filling the container because of settling of the chip products. The settled chips can fuse together if exposed to elevated temperatures for long periods, thus it is desirable to store the case packaged products at cool or refrigerated temperatures. 7. High-temperature exposure: High storage or shipping temperatures immediately after flaking will accelerate the heat of crystallization temperatures. The higher temperature exposure promotes surface melting and fusion of the flakes. Controlled temperature storage of 70°F (21.1°C) or less should be utilized for packaged flakes, with a holding period of 48 to 72 hours to stabilize the product temperature before shipment. 8. Feed-trough leak: The most common source of lumps in flaked products is a leak in the feed trough that allows liquid to drip into the flake collector, where it begins to solidify and acts as an adhesive, collecting other chips until a lump is formed, which breaks away to enter the package. Leaks must be repaired when the roll is not operating. Attempts to repair a trough leak while operating by inserting some material or instrument into the leak could initiate a more serious problem. The temporary repair material can escape and find its way into the finished product package. This material then becomes a foreign material in the flaked product, which could be more serious than the original problem. 9. Saturation level: Flake clumping or lumping problems become more severe as the melting point of the product increases. The flake release point from the chill roll is proportional to the fatty-acid chain length and the degree of saturation, which control the solidification temperature. Flake products with the highest melting points release from the chill-roll surface at a higher temperature than products with lower melting points. Both higher and lower melting products experience approximately the same heat of crystallization level, but the less hydrogenated product will attain a lower temperature before packaging, as shown by the following selected data: Soybean Oil Flakes Iodine value
1.5
7.0
83.0
75.7
1.8
7.4
Fatty acid composition, % C-18:0 Stearic C-18:1 Oleic Product temperature, °F Initial in-package
110 to 115
100 to 102
30-Minute in-package
140 to 142
130 to 133
616
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Problem: High Moisture Content Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Heating coil leaks: Flaked products have melting points that require heating before chilling to remain liquid. The steam heating coils of the holding tank will eventually develop leaks from wear and vibration. Each oil product should be sampled properly and analyzed before flaking to ensure that the product has not been contaminated with moisture or other foreign materials. Proper sampling technique requires agitation for 20 to 30 minutes before sampling to ensure a representative sample. High-moisture analysis should prevent flaking of the product and initiate an investigation to determine the cause and corrective action required. 2. Line steaming: The melting point of flaked products necessitates that the transfer lines be heat traced to prevent the product from solidifying in elbows, low areas, and so on. When the heat tracing on the flake transfer lines fails or an operator has failed to clear the lines after a product transfer, the product remaining in the line will solidify and prevent further transfer of product. One method used to open these lines is to steam them to melt the product causing the restriction. This process will contaminate the product holding tank with moisture. All of this product must be reprocessed to remove the excess moisture content. 3. Wet roll: Moisture collects on the chill roll where it is not covered with a film of oil. The amount of moisture condensing on the roll is dependent on the room humidity and the roll cooling temperature. This moisture will transfer to the surface of the flakes or chips produced. This moisture content cannot be eliminated, but can be controlled somewhat by: a. Dehumidification: Air conditioning or dehumidification units are required to control room humidity at a reasonable level. These units are even more important in humid climates to control the product moisture content. b. Startup product: Product flaked on startup or after a down period will be wetter than during continuous operations. This product should be discarded until the startup excess moisture has been dissipated. 4. Additives effects: Some of the preferred flavors for flaked products are water emulsions; analysis after the addition of these flavors indicates a wet oil. This moisture presence must be recognized and allowed for by the specifications. However, the level must be controlled in case another moisture source has also developed.
Problem: Free Fatty Acid Increase Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. High moisture: Condensation on the roll surface transfers to the flakes and chips. This moisture will initiate the hydrolysis reaction, where the chemical bonds that hold the triglycerides together are broken, creating free fatty acid, monoglyceride, diglycerides, and even glycerides if the hydrolysis is extensive. The expected free fatty acid increase from hydrolysis is usually from 0.05% or less before flaking to as high as 0.10% as shipped. The condensation moisture must be controlled by dehumidification and discarding startup product with a high moisture content to maintain acceptable free fatty acid levels.
Troubleshooting
617
2. Lecithin addition: The addition of small quantities of lecithin to oils before flaking will emulsify some of the moisture from the roll to help reduce the free fatty acid development. Acceptance of the lecithin additive for this purpose has not been universally accepted. This addition could cause more problems than benefits in some cases, such as product darkening, smoking, and off-odor with hightemperature processing. 3. Analysis endpoint: The free fatty acid analysis by AOCS Official Method Ca 5a40 requires the titration of a solution of the oil sample in alcohol with an alkaline solution until a pink color develops. Colored flake products interfere with the identification of this color endpoint, which usually results in a higher free fatty acid content. Special care must be exercised with these analyses to determine the true free fatty acid content. 4. Phosphoric acid overdose: Oils are acid treated to chelate the trace metals during several different processes. Phosphoric acid is usually less expensive and more effective than the alternative citric acid; however, it has been found to form compounds with the partial glycerides and carbohydrates in the oil, which makes it difficult to achieve the desired level of free fatty acids with deodorization, or the free fatty acid may rise rapidly during storage. These reactions are not experienced with citric acid until the treatment level is increased substantially.
Problem: Small Flakes or Chips Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. High oil temperature to the roll: Cool the oil to the specified temperature before application to the chill roll. 2. High chill-roll temperature: Cool the chill roll to the specified temperature before the heated oil is applied to the roll surface. 3. Insufficient refrigeration capacity: The refrigeration capacity must be adequate to provide the cold chill-roll temperatures required for the individual flake products. 4. Roll speed too fast: Adjust the roll speed to produce the flake or chip specified. 5. Insufficient quantity of oil to the roll: Raise the level in the feed trough or increase the quantity to the applicator roll to cover the surface of the chill roll.
Problem: Chartreuse Color Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Color change: Chips with a beta-carotene color have shown a tendency to change color after flaking from the desired yellow to chartreuse color. The color change has been identified as an oxidation problem, promoted by oxygen available in moisture condensate molecules from the surface of the chill roll. The color change is accelerated by exposure of the colored chips to refrigerated temperatures immediately after flaking. Two feasible methods to prevent the color change have been identified: a. Tempering: Hold the packaged chips at 85°F (29.4°C) for 24 hours before refrigeration. Apparently, this tempering stabilizes the beta-carotene colorant and makes the product resistant to the oxidative reaction.
618
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
b. Lecithin addition: Add 0.1% lecithin to the formulation to bind the moisture enough to prevent a reaction with the beta-carotene colorant.
Problem: Metal Contamination Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Chill-roll construction: Most older chill rolls were uncoated steel drums that rusted rapidly because of the condensate formed on the cold surface. The first products produced after a down period almost always contained visible quantities of rust from the roll surface. The product produced had to be physically rejected until the rust had visibly disappeared. The potential for rust contamination of the product flaked with these rolls is virtually assured with every production. Chrome plating of the older rolls and new construction have eliminated rust as a contaminant from this source. 2. Filter equipment: Rust can be developed from the moisture condensed inside the filter equipment as a result of the product heat, humidity, and cool room temperature. The rust can enter the product by several avenues if it is not removed from the filter shell periodically. Or, a better preventative measure would be to clean and dry the filter shell each time the filter cartridges are replaced. This metal contaminant appears as black specks that are not large enough to be detected by packaging line metal detectors. Inline magnets would collect the metal specks. 3. Equipment maintenance: The liquid oil in the feed trough and the oil film on the chill roll are exposed while the oil is being solidified into flakes and chips. Therefore, this open process could allow the entry of maintenance items, such as nuts, bolts, or other equipment parts, into the packaged product. Efficient metal detection of the packaged product is necessary to identify these metal contaminants before shipment to customers. 4. Applicator warp: Several different application mechanisms are used to apply the heated liquid oil to chill rolls. Most, but not all, of these mechanisms can warp with use due to stress from heating and cooling, movement for flake size, heavy weight of the applicator supported only on the ends of the roll, etc. The amount of misalignment can cause the applicator to gouge the chill roll, causing metal contamination of the product. Constant observation of the application techniques subject to this problem is necessary, or a change to an addition system that does not have this potential is needed. In either case, metal detection of the packaged product is mandatory to ensure that the products do not have metal contamination.
Problem: Color Increase Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Overheating: Heat accelerates the reaction of atmospheric oxygen with edible fats and oils. Heat abuse causes an increase in the color of flaked products by oxidation of tocopherols. For deodorized products, the speed of oxidation is doubled for each 20°F (11.1°C) increase in temperature. A holding temperature of 10°F (5.6°C) above the melting point for flaked products should be sufficient. Design of the transfer systems should also take into account the product requirements. For example, the
Troubleshooting
619
transfer lines should be as short and straight as possible to minimize the amount of insulated heat-traced lines where residual product can deteriorate. 2. Colorant added: Some flaked products require the addition of a colorant for a butter-like appearance. Addition to the wrong product or the use of a tank previously used for a colored product will result in a high red color. Yellow colors can be removed by redeodorization in most cases, as the colors readily heat bleach. 3. Identification error: Product samples must be identified by tank number, batch number, and product identity to help ensure that the sample identity is correct. Different source oils, product types, additives, processing, etc. have an effect on the color requirements of the flaked shortening. A color result that is well within the specified limits for one product can be beyond the tolerance limits for another. Any suspicion of an error should be resolved by resampling and retesting before packaging. 4. Pumping error: The product delivered to the indicated tank may show a major change in analytical characteristics, with color being an early indicator. Good procedures require the oil pumper to verify the transfer alignment by first blowing air or nitrogen from the originating tank to the receiving tank. It is also mandatory that the receiving department be notified, preferably in writing, of the product pumped and to which tank for identification and to avoid errors. 5. Faulty valves: A partially open valve on a transfer line can allow contamination of another product even though the alignment precautions were taken and everything appeared satisfactory. Two indicators of this problem are that (1) the product quantity delivered to the intended tank is less than the originating tank, and (2) analysis of the tank with the faulty value will change. The visual color of the product may be one of the first indicators of the commingled product. 6. Nonrepresentative sample: Tanks to be sampled must be agitated for 20 to 30 minutes, the product temperature must be 10° above the melting point, the sample line must be flushed to clear the previous product sampled, and a clean sample container must be used to obtain a representative sample. Any indication that a nonrepresentative sample has been obtained should be cause to resample the product. 7. Cloudy sample: A visually cloudy product during sampling or analysis indicates that the product temperature is too low, and corrective actions are required. Cloudy product during sampling probably indicates that the tank temperature gauge or controller may be faulty and requires maintenance. This product should not be sampled until a clear product is available; likewise, the Lovibond color analysis will provide a high result if any cloudiness is allowed. Special precautions with high-melting-point products should be taken to ensure that all of the product is melted. One fault that can easily occur with the analysis is to allow the color tube to stand on a cool surface to deaerate before reading the color. High-melting-point products have a tendency to set up rapidly on the bottom of the tube, which gives a false high color reading. 8. Trace metals: All products should be postbleached to help remove any trace metals present after hydrogenation and the catalyst-filtering step. Most trace metals are prooxidants, which cause product color rises through oxidation of the natural tocopherols even in the highly saturated products. 9. Localized overheating: All storage tanks with heating devices should be equipped with a mechanical agitator. Power agitation will minimize damage from localized overheating while saving time and heating costs. If the agitation is temporarily out of service, the temperature differential between the melting point of the product
620
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
and the heating medium must be kept to a minimum to preserve the product quality. Damage to the oil near the coils caused by localized overheating affects all of the product in the tank. The product may require rebleaching and redeodorization to regain most of the original color stability of the product. 10. Phosphoric acid reaction: Oils are acid treated before bleaching to reduce the phosphorus content and chelate the trace metals. Phosphoric acid is usually less expensive and more effective than the alternative citric acid; however, it has been found to form compounds with the partial glycerides and carbohydrates in the oil that darken in the deodorizer. Additionally, it may be difficult to achieve the desired free fatty acid content, or the level of free fatty acid may rise rapidly during storage. These reactions are not experienced with citric acid until the treatment level is increased substantially.
Problem: Foreign Material Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Unfiltered product transfer line: The product transfer line between the filter and the chill roll can be a source of foreign material. The high melting point of most flaked products requires heat tracing of the lines or frequent thawing of setup lines at startup and any time the product is not physically moving. Setup lines have to be thawed with heat from some source that can polymerize and char a portion of the oil in the lines. This material will appear as black specks in the flaked product. This material must be set aside for reprocessing to remove the black polymerized oil specks. 2. Improper product package use: The product packages should never be used for any use other than for which they were intended. Sanitation personnel have used product containers for trash, which has inadvertently been shipped to a customer. Not even the draw-off material at startup should be filled into regular product containers. 3. Uncovered chill rolls: The chill rolls should have shields covering them for product protection from airborne foreign materials. The shields must be designed to fit the chill rolls without hampering operation or maintenance or restricting the cooling process. 4. Open product containers: Empty product cases should not be stacked with the opening exposed to possible foreign material on the packing floor. Even in the most controlled environment some foreign objects will find entry into the open cases. Erected cases must be covered or stored upside down before use. Also, the plastic liner should not be inserted until just before filling.
Problem: Iodine Value Change Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Pumping error: AOCS Official Method Cd 1-25 for iodine value analysis is a good control to assure that the intended product has been pumped from one location to another. Any change outside the normal analytical variation (probably ± 0.5 tolerance) indicates a change in the product delivered. This change could be the result of
Troubleshooting
621
(1) product pumped to the wrong tank, (2) a faulty value allowing the commingling of two or more products, (3) product delivered on top of a heel from the previous product, or (4) a mispumping of another product into the designated product. Good control dictates that the products should be sampled and analyzed as close to the packaging time as possible to identify these type problems. 2. Sampling error: A representative sample requires that a predetermined protocol be established and observed. The following sampling protocol identifies the areas to be considered: a. Product temperature: Flaked products have low iodine values with corresponding high melting points. The products must be held at 10°F above the typical melting point to remain clear and pumpable. b. Agitation: The tank to be sampled should be agitated for at least 20 to 30 minutes before sampling. Agitation is necessary for a uniform temperature throughout the tank for a representative sample and product packaging. Product under the coils or adhering to the tank walls in a quiescent state will provide a nonrepresentative sample. c. Flush sample line: Product from the previous product sampled will collect in the small-diameter sample lines. Flushing with the current product is necessary to clear the sample line to obtain a uniform product. d. Clean sample container: Clean sample containers must be used for all samples to avoid contamination of the product with a previous product or another material. e. Visual appearance: The sampler should observe the visual appearance of the sample while filling the sample container. A sample with visible hard fractions or a cloudy appearance indicates that the sample line has not been flushed or the tank temperature indicator is faulty and requires maintenance to properly identify the product temperature. The product should not be sampled until a clear product representative of the product in the tank can be secured. f. Sample identification: The sample must be identified with the tank number, batch number, product identity, date, time, and person obtaining the sample to ensure that the sample is correct and to provide information for follow-up if a discrepancy occurs. 3. Additive changes: Some additives will change the iodine value result, which should be reflected on the iodine value limits of the product specification. Flaked product additives that can materially affect the iodine value results include lecithin and other emulsifiers.
13.2.24 Packaged Shortening: Storage and Transportation Problem: Absorbed Flavors Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Storage conditions: Most fats and oils products will absorb odors and flavors from other foods and materials quite readily. Therefore, shortenings, oils, margarines, and other specialty fats and oils products should never be stored or transported with aromatic foods, such as spices, garlic, onions, pickles, fruits, smoked products, or any other materials, such as ammonia, solvents, or petroleum products.
622
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Problem: Oil Separation Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Shipping temperature: The melting characteristics for the shortening product must be considered when shipping temperature requirements are established. Products with sharp melting points and steep SFI curves require temperature-protected shipping, especially in the summer months. 2. Crystal structure: β′-crystal habit shortenings are more heat stable than β-crystal habit products and usually will withstand higher temperatures if formulated with a sufficient level of hardstock. 3. Stack height: Pressure from the weight of the cases stacked on top of them can cause the bottom cases to have excessive oil leakage. The corrugated cases can act like an ink blotter to soak up the separated oil. Small quantities of liquid oil will stain an entire case, and the stain will migrate upward to the other cases. Stack height must be controlled for these product formulations, especially in the summer months. 4. Coated cases: In some cases, it is necessary to utilize wax or plastic coatings for the cases to prevent wicking problems caused by separated oil.
13.2.25 Quality Control Laboratory Problem: Faulty Analyses Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Technique: The work of laboratory analysts is precision work. To be efficient, their techniques or working habits must also be precise. Because of the varied types of instruments and other equipment with which they work, many practices or tricks of the trade must be learned that are too numerous to write into methods. These must be learned from literature, other laboratory workers, or experience. The essence of experimentation is technique or scientific skill, and the simplest procedure will give unreliable results if the technique is poor or incorrect. Listed below are some poor technique practices and an indication of some of the analysis affected: a. Poor analytical balance technique: This is especially dangerous when small amounts are weighed for testing for analyses, such as iodine value. If large weights are involved in the weighing of small amounts, the summation of the tolerances will cause a poor result for the evaluation. For other tests, such as soapstock analysis and moisture content, the samples must be weighed quickly before moisture escapes in the dry atmosphere of the balance. b. Misreading thermometers: Tilt of a thermometer, type of thermometer, level at which it is held while being read, divisions on a thermometer, faulty thermometers, agitation, and time in a sample before reading are all factors to be considered when reading a thermometer. Proper reading of a thermometer is vital to the success of such tests as cloud points, melting points, congeal points, bleach, titer, quick titer, and smoke point. c. Poor titration: Poor titrations caused by improper agitation of sample, carelessness, or misreading a burette will give poor results on such tests as free fatty acid determinations, peroxide value, and caustic analyses.
Troubleshooting
623
d. Improper laboratory scale technique: Cleanliness, inaccurate weights, and other improper scale practices affect such tests as refining analysis, bleach, cloud point, peroxide value, and smoke point, among others. e. Use of shortcuts: Cutting short the time necessary for certain procedures or leaving out procedures that may seem unimportant can easily provide poor results for refining, iodine value, soapstock, and bleach analyses, among others. f. Improper baths: Wrong temperatures, improper agitation, and cutting short the duration in baths may give the wrong results for such analyses as refining, titer, SFI, melting points, cold test, and AOM stability, among others. g. Overheating: Overheating is physically dangerous during bleach and some moisture evaluations. Overheating of oils prior to color tests is a source of error. For example, if a sample of shortening is overheated while melting, the color reading will be higher than the true color of the sample. This can be easily be done by leaving the sample on the steam bath too long. h. Care of equipment: Improper care of equipment affects most testing in the laboratory, but especially refractive index, color readings, fatty acid composition, Mettler dropping point, and other analysis requiring laboratory equipment to perform the evaluations. i. Misreading endpoints: Endpoints should be approached at the rate specified in the method, and the analyst must be able to recognize them. Improper recognition of an endpoint will give inaccurate results for such evaluations as most melting points, titrations, quick titer, and cold test, among others. j. Faulty comparative blanks: A blank is used in analyses such as iodine value and peroxide value. The blank requires as much care as the regular sample analysis to ensure accurate results. k. Poor filtering or sample washing: The importance of sample filtering and washing techniques are reviewed and emphasized in most of the analytical chemistry literature. These techniques are essential in soapstock analysis and other evaluations with a somewhat similar procedure. l. Improper sample drying: Trace amounts of moisture will produce abnormally low cold tests and adversely affect many other analytical evaluations. 2. Sampling errors: In many analyses, the technician is required to use a small portion of a large sample for the evaluation. Extreme care must be exercised to obtain a representative portion and when reducing a large portion to the very small amounts required for most analysis. If the oil to be sampled is a hardened oil, it should be completely liquid before weighing for individual analyses. 3. Mathematical errors: Misplacing a decimal point, transposing numbers, inaccurate addition or subtraction, or other simple mathematical errors will provide an inaccurate analytical result even when good technique has been practiced throughout the testing procedure. 4. Transcription errors: Excellent technique and execution of the evaluation can be lost when transcribing the data from a worksheet to the user department or the permanent record. 5. Laboratory noise and confusion: A high percentage of the errors in some laboratories have been traced to the amount of noise and confusion in the laboratory. Management and laboratory analysts should keep any interference to a minimum. Noise and interference affect the work of everyone working in the same laboratory.
624
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
6. Wild results: Seasoned analysts should be well-enough acquainted with the history of the sample, the effect of various variables in the test, and the probable results to recognize a wild result and take the necessary corrective actions, which may include an examination of the equipment, reagents, sample identity, etc., to determine any problems. If not acquainted with the history of a particular sample, the analyst must rely on the specification, and any suspect result should be rechecked. 7. Laboratory cleanup: Cleanliness and good housekeeping are integral to good laboratory technique. Minute amounts of impurities can spoil a sensitive test and, to a greater degree, provide erroneous results for any evaluation either qualitative or quantitative. Therefore, floors, tables, clothing, etc. must be kept clean, as well as the instruments, glassware, and other utensils used for the actual analysis. 8. Glassware washing: The importance of absolutely clean containers for all laboratory evaluations cannot be overemphasized. Any film of soap, dirt, or oil on glassware or other laboratory containers will act as a prooxidant and seriously deteriorate the keeping quality of stored samples or the results of analysis. The procedures recommended for washing specialized laboratory glassware, such as dilatometers, burettes, pipettes, etc., are usually described in the individual methods. Regardless of the procedure used for washing, a visual inspection of all glassware should be made before the glassware is used, and any questionable glassware pieces should be rewashed.
13.2.26 Edible Fats and Oils: Organoleptic Evaluations Problem: Off-Flavor Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Flavor description: Experienced edible fats and oils tasters’ description of the flavor type helps identify the cause of an off-flavor. Descriptions of the flavor types encountered when tasting edible fats and oils are listed below: a. Beany: A hay-like flavor, sometimes called “weedy” by some, most frequently seen in soybean oil products. It is somewhat objectionable when present to a slight degree, but quite objectionable when present to a strong degree; probably grades off into a “painty” flavor when very intense. b. Bitter: A flavor characteristic of products containing materials, such as polysorbate emulsifiers. It is not objectionable when present to a slight degree, but very objectionable when intensified. c. Corn: Most times described as musty or somewhat reminiscent of popcorn. It is not objectionable when present to a slight degree. d. Dowtherm contamination: Caused by leakage in Dowtherm coils in the deodorizer. When very faint, it is reminiscent of the odor of geraniums, but when moderate to strong it is readily recognized as resembling the somewhat aromatic or phenolic odor of Dowtherm A®. It is only moderately objectionable initially, but becomes very objectionable as the degree of contamination increases. e. Fishy: A flavor reminiscent of cod liver oil, sometimes seen in heat-mistreated soybean oil. It may also be related to “sour” (described below). f. Lardy: Flavor like steam-rendered hog lard, maybe faintly skunky. It is moderately objectionable when present to a slight degree, but quite objectionable when present to a strong degree.
Troubleshooting
625
g. Monoglyceride: More of a “feel” rather than a flavor; when slight, it is characterized by a rich taste or feel in the mouth, like cream. When very strong, it gives a bitter or puckering sensation and is one of the least objectionable type of flavors at a slight to moderate intensity. h. Musty: Flavor reminiscent of the odor of a moldy or dark cellar room. It is quite objectionable when present to a slight degree, but very objectionable when present to a strong degree. i. Nutty: Flavor reminiscent of fresh pecans; one of the least objectionable type flavors. When very intense, this flavor grades off into an objectionable, rubberlike flavor. j. Oxidized: A not quite fresh flavor characteristic of oils exposed to air or that are slightly old. It is sometimes “metallic” flavored to some observers, is somewhat objectionable when present to a slight degree, and is moderately objectionable when present to a strong degree. When very intense, it grades off into “rancid.” k. Oxidized meat fat: Rancid flavor caused by exposure to air, overheating, or age. Mild characteristics are sometimes called “scorched.” l. Painty: A flavor reminiscent of the odor of linseed oil, or drying paint, after the solvent odor has disappeared. It is related to “beany” (as described above). It is quite objectionable when present to a slight degree, but very objectionable when present to a strong degree. m. Rancid: A very disagreeable, sometimes sharp, biting, or nauseating flavor in very old or strongly oxidized fats and oils. It is related to the “oxidized” flavor and is very objectionable when present to any degree. n. Pine-like: Describes the typical odor and flavor of sunflower oil.38 o. Raw: A flavor of not quite deodorized unhydrogenated oils, frequently observed in cottonseed salad oil and called “earthy” by some. It is somewhat objectionable when present to a slight degree, but moderately objectionable when present to a strong degree. When very intense, it may grade off into an “undeodorized” flavor. p. Rubbery: A flavor reminiscent of the odor of old rubber; related to “nutty” and quite objectionable when present to a slight degree, but very objectionable when present to a strong degree. q. Soapy: Soap-like flavor, usually associated with the degradation of fats containing lauric fatty acids. It is quite objectionable when present to only a slight degree. r. Sour: A sour-milky flavor like oil separated from fresh margarine. It is somewhat objectionable when present to a slight or moderate degree. When very intense, it probably grades off into a very objectionable “fishy” or “fish oil” flavor. s. Sour meat fat: Very strong objectionable flavor, sometimes called a “steep water” taste. This condition is usually caused by excessive protein and moisture in the rendered meat fat product. t. Sulfur vegetable flavor, like Brussels sprouts: Describes the typical odor and flavor of canola oil.38 u. Tallow: Flavor like beef fat from a roast after a day or so in the refrigerator, or like mutton fat. It is moderately objectionable when present to a strong degree. v. Undeodorized: A flavor characteristic of the odor of hydrogenated oil before deodorization. It has an unpleasant aromatic or aldehydric flavor and is quite
626
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
objectionable when present to a slight degree, but very objectionable when present to a strong degree. w. Watermelon: Flavor reminiscent of biting into watermelon rind or of cucumbers. It is quite objectionable when present to a slight degree, but very objectionable when present to a strong degree. 2. Oxidation characteristics: The oxidation course has two distinct phases. The initial period of relatively slow oxidation is called the induction period. Then, after a certain critical amount of oxidation has occurred, the reaction enters a second phase characterized by a rapid rate of oxidation, which increases to many times greater than during the initial phase. The second phase begins when the fat or oil begins to smell or taste oxidized. 3. Flavor deterioration: — Fats differ considerably in the way in which their oxidation and accompanying flavor deterioration proceed. The more highly saturated animal fats and hydrogenated oils have relatively little change in odor and flavor during the early phases of oxidation. Off-flavor development in these fats is both sudden and definite; however, relatively unsaturated oils, such as cottonseed or soybean oils, have a more gradual deterioration in flavor and odor.39 4. Light effect: Light has a deleterious effect on the flavor stability of edible oils and fat-containing foods. Exposures of one half to one hour have been shown to produce significant changes in both flavor and peroxide values of laboratory control tests with refined, bleached, and deodorized (RBD) soybean, cottonseed, and safflower oils and two hydrogenated, winterized soybean oil products. The off-flavor was described as “light struck” (grassy or green) combined with a mouth sensation described as astringent. The flavor and peroxide values of the oil are affected to the greatest degree during the first 30 to 60 minutes of exposure, and from then on the change is gradual. Light-stability testing indicates that the degradation of oils is the same for all oils, even with measures such as hydrogenation, which improves the resistance to oxidation as related to temperature abuse. Containers that exclude light have effectively protected edible oils and fat-containing foods from the offflavors described as “light struck.”40 5. Absorbed oxygen: The amount of oxygen that must be absorbed to produce offflavors varies considerably according to the composition of the fat or oil, the presence of natural or added antioxidants, the metal content (especially copper, iron, and heavy metals), and the product temperature. 6. Thermal decomposition: Handling and storage of heated fats and oils always raises the risk of thermal decomposition. Some products are more sensitive to heat than others, especially those with an additive. For example, lecithin addition to deodorized oils will increase the heat sensitivity of the product. At temperatures above 160°F (70°C), lecithin will turn dark, smoke, and smell fishy. Other additives can also affect the resistance of a product to deterioration. If heating is necessary, it should be done with either hot water or low-pressure steam (<1.5 kg/cm2). 7. Absorbed odor and flavor: Fats and oils easily absorb odor and flavors from many different sources, for example, paint, solvents, laboratory chemicals, spices, gases, and fumes. Therefore, great care must be exercised when painting in or around the processing plant and during maintenance of equipment to avoid contamination with solvents and gases, and fats and oils packaged products should never be stored with other highly odoriferous materials or foods. 8. Commingling of fats: Contamination of one source oil with another provides flavors and odors foreign to the initial product that are objectionable. For example, liquid
Troubleshooting
627
domestic oils do not tolerate contamination with coconut, palm kernel, or other lauric oils. The short-chain fatty acids (C-4 to C-12) have a low taste threshold value when only slightly hydrolyzed in high-moisture or high-fat prepared food products.
13.2.27 Edible Fats and Oils Formulation Problem: Oxidative Stability Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Shelf life considerations: Oxidative stability can be predicted based on the fatty acid composition, but various minor components of fats and oils also contribute to the oxidative stability. Listed below are the primary areas to consider when formulating to minimize oxidation degradation:41-43 a. Degree of unsaturation: In general, the more unsaturated the fatty acid, the faster the rate of oxidation. b. Glycerol moiety position: Polyunsaturated fatty acids located at the sn-2 position of the glycerol moiety have been found to be more prone to oxidation than the same fatty acids at the sn-1 and sn- 3 positions. In contrast, oleic fatty acid (C-18:1) at the sn-2 position has been proven more stable. c. Carbon chain location: The double bond closest to the carbonyl group has the highest susceptibility, those located near the terminal group have the next highest susceptibility, and those located in the middle are the most stable. d. Antioxidant type and quantity: Antioxidants delay the onset of oxidation by inhibiting or interrupting the free-radical oxidation mechanism. The natural phenols in vegetable oils, both the simple molecules and their esters or more complex molecules, such as flavones, chalcones, and flavonoids, have antioxidant properties. Most synthetic antioxidants used to retard oxidation in processed fats and oils also phenolic compounds: typically, TBHQ for vegetable oils and butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) for animal fats. Other naturally occurring antioxidative components in foods include lignans, terpens, tocopherols, phospholipids, and polyfunctional organic acids. Tocopherols naturally present in vegetable oils are most frequently used, but others may be more functional, such as rosemary extract or epicatechin gallate extracted from Chinese green tea leaves. Natural rosemary extract is effective in delaying oxidation in fats and oils at levels up to 1500 ppm. However, the characteristic herbal flavor limits application rates in many foods to 750 to 1000 ppm. In application studies, 100 to 500 ppm rosemary extract inhibited oxidation similar to that of 200 ppm BHA/BHT.44 Marine oils treated with 200 ppm epicatechin gallate, extracted from green tea leaves, had an oxidative stability markedly better than a 500 ppm treatment of alphatocopherol, better than 200 ppm treatments of BHA or BHT, and only slightly better than a 200 ppm treatment of TBHQ. e. Metals: The presence of metals in lipids accelerates the oxidation process; cooper, manganese, nickel, and iron are particularly potent catalyst when present at levels as low as a few parts per million. Inactivation of the catalytic effect of these metals can be achieved by the use of a chelating agent, sometimes called protective antioxidants, such as citric acid or EDTA.
628
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
f. Mono- and diglycerides: Either added mono- and diglycerides or those formed by hydrolysis lower the oxidative stability of fats and oils. The degree of oxidation increases as the level of mono- and diglycerides increase. g. Free fatty acid content: Free fatty acid forms complexes with metals and makes them more stable and active to accelerate oxidation. Fats and oils processing controls routinely require a 0.05% maximum free fatty acid. Free fatty acid development after deodorization is normally due to hydrolysis. h. Chlorophyll: Chlorophyll and its derivatives are able to transfer energy from light to other molecules. Singlet oxygen formed during this transfer reacts 1500 times faster with unsaturated fatty acids than ground-state oxygen. Chlorophyll also degrades to pheophytins and pheophorbids during processing, which accelerates oxidation. Chlorophyll must be removed from oils during the initial bleaching process before it is set and almost impossible to eliminate. i. Carotenoids: These natural pigments contain conjugated double bonds capable of quenching singlet oxygen. Unfortunately, conjugated fatty acids are also capable of forming radicals, which initiate oxidation degradation of oils. j. Plant sterols: Phytosterols are present in vegetable oils in free and esterified forms involving fatty acids and other components. Some of the plant sterols have antipolymerization properties to protect oils during heating, but will undergo oxidation similar to cholesterol, and animal fat sterol, to form a variety of oxidation products. These compounds are not as inert as thought earlier and work continues to identify their contribution to oxidation. k. High temperature, light, oxygen, and moisture exposure: Protection from exposure to these four elements during processing, packaging, storage, and distribution is necessary to retard oxidation. i. Temperature: Oils and food products should be maintained at the lowest practical temperature that will not initiate crystallization of the saturated fatty acids. ii. Light: Even limited exposure to sunlight or fluorescent lighting will increase the oxidation rate of oils. iii. Oxygen: Effective protection against oxidation, practiced by fats and oils processors and some food processors, is the replacement of air in the oil and container headspace with an inert gas such as nitrogen. iv. Moisture: Free fatty acids result from the hydrolysis of oils caused by moisture contamination. l. Stainless steel equipment: Oxidation is an autocatalyzed reaction and incipient oxidation should be prevented as early as possible in processing. Reasonable oxidative stability for some fats and oils can be produced with mild steel tanks, pipes, and process equipment, but oils with less inherent stability or a higher iodine value demand the use of stainless steel equipment, at least for deodorization and finished product storage.45 m. Interesterification: Reduction of the active natural antioxidants during alkali catalyzed interesterification decreases oxidative stability. Additions of tocopherols or a synthetic antioxidant are necessary to regain oxidative stability. n. Fractionation: The natural antioxidants accumulate in the liquid olein fraction. Trace heavy-metal salts (soaps) accumulate in the stearine fraction and with the tocopherol loss it undergoes a loss of oxidative stability despite its more saturated character.
Troubleshooting
629
13.2.28 Edible Fats and Oils: Processed Oil Storage Problem: Oxidative Stability Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Crude oil storage: Autoxidative damage is less prevalent with liquid vegetable oils, which are well protected by natural antioxidants. Animal fats and fish oils do not contain any appreciable natural antioxidants and, therefore, if they are to be held in storage, they should be protected by added phenolic-type antioxidants and kept in closed tanks with a limited headspace or nitrogen protection. 2. Refined oil storage: Alkali neutralization removes the free fatty acids, and an appreciable amount of other materials that contain hydroxylic and carbonylic hydroperoxide decomposition products, dimmers and polymers, steroids, tocopherols, waxes, and the majority of the residual phospholipids, which are carried away with the soapstock. The traces of soap remaining after water washing protect the oils against autoxidation, although it may promote hydrolysis. 3. Interesterified oils: Due to the reduction of the active natural antioxidants during chemical interesterification these oils are unprotected against oxidation after the catalyst has been deactivated with water and dried. Addition of a phenolic antioxidant before drying is recommended if liquid oils are part of the blend. Exclusion of air exposure is also recommended. 4. Fractionated oils: The natural oxidants accumulate in the liquid or olein fraction and the more saturated or stearin fraction loses its protection and trace heavymetals salts accumulate in this fraction to doubly endanger its oxidative stability despite it higher saturated fatty acid content. Antioxidants should be added to the stearin fraction, it should be kept melted (10°F above melting point) for limited periods only, and protected with a nitrogen atmosphere. 5. Bleached oils: The residual bleaching earth fines serve as free-radical promoters that initiate autoxidation. Bleaching earths contain quite appreciable amounts of iron, partly in ionic form, because of the ion exchange nature of the earth. Storing bleached oil in unprotected conditions with access to air invites postponed, offflavor problems with the finished, deodorized oils.
13.3 SHORTENING APPLICATIONS 13.3.1 Baking Shortening Problem: Pink-Colored Baked Products Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Antioxidant: Alkaline metal ions, such as sodium or potassium, in leavenings and dairy products used in baked products, such as biscuits, pizza crusts, and cakes, can react with TBHQ and BHA antioxidants to cause a pink color. The color is not harmful, but it does present an undesirable appearance, thus these antioxidants
630
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
should not be used in baking shortenings that will be used in products with leavening agents or dairy products.
Problem: Poor Creaming Properties Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Too soft: Plastic shortenings extend into streaks and films in cake batters to lubricate large surfaces and entrap large quantities of air, which has a leavening effect. Shortenings with soft consistencies are not able to retain all of the incorporated air. Creaming volume evaluations reveal this deficiency with a decrease in batter-specific gravity determinations. The creaming volume performance test (see Method 8.1 in Chapter 3) measures air incorporation at 15- and 20-minute mixing intervals of the first stage of an old-fashion pound cake formula. An increase in the batterspecific gravity at the 20-minute determination point indicates that the shortening is releasing the entrapped air. A soft consistency allowing this breakdown can be the result of: a. Steep solids fat index: Shortenings with a wide plastic range provide optimum creaming properties. A wide plastic range can be produced by combining a flat, soft basestock with a β′-crystal-forming hardstock. A shortening with most of the SFI results between 15 and 25% has a wide plastic range. b. Low SFI content: The percent solids in a compound shortening can be increased by increasing the hardstock level without a substantial change in the SFI slope. c. High-creaming gas (nitrogen) addition: In an effort to improve shortening whiteness at filling, some operators may increase the creaming gas or nitrogen content excessively. Shortenings with excessive creaming gas become puffy and soft with a resultant loss in creaming properties. d. Low chill-unit temperatures: Low chilling-unit temperatures produce softer shortening consistencies. Penetration control values indicating a softer-thandesired shortening should trigger a change in the chilling-unit outlet temperature to maintain the desired creaming properties. e. High working after chilling: High revolutions per minute, extended working times, or a combination of the two conditions after chilling will increase the softening of the shortening consistency and potentially affect the creaming properties. Penetration evaluations should help identify a trend toward this condition, allowing corrective actions before a serious decrease in creaming properties is experienced. f. High shortening-use temperature: Normally, the use temperature of shortening is 65 to 75°F (18 to 24°C). Higher use temperatures will soften the shortening and reduce the creaming properties. If a high use temperature is the norm for a particular operation, the shortening hardstock level can be increased to provide a specialty-use shortening for optimum creaming properties in this situation. 2. Too firm: Firm shortenings do not extend into streaks and films in cake batters easily, which reduces the air entrapment and diminishes the leavening effect. Creaming volume evaluations will show high specific gravity results at both the 15- and 20-minute determinations. This condition should also be readily
Troubleshooting
631
evident by consistency and penetration evaluations. Firm shortenings can be affected by: a. Too high SFI results: High SFI contents produce firm shortenings. An adjustment in the hardstock level to decrease the percent solids should automatically reduce the firm consistency of the shortening. However, if the specified basestock is too hard, the required reduction in hardstock may be too high to maintain the heat resistance of the shortening. In this situation, the basestock should not be used. If this is a blending situation during processing, the out-oflimits basestock should be rehardened into another product. b. High chill-unit temperature: Firm shortening consistencies can also result from high chilling-unit temperatures. Penetration and physical consistency evaluations should identify this problem before the shortening is shipped, but this is after-the-fact control. The proper crystallization conditions should be identified and specified for each product as developed. Then, penetration and physical consistency evaluations should identify slight drifts or trends that require attention, even though the current product still has satisfactory results. c. Low working after chilling: Shortening consistency is dependent on the amount of working after chilling. Less working will produce firmer shortenings that do not have optimum creaming properties. 3. β-crystal habit: The large granular crystals of the β polymorphic form produce products that are waxy and grainy with poor aeration potentials. Shortenings exhibiting a stable β′-crystal form have smooth consistencies that provide good aeration and excellent creaming properties. The source oils used in the composition of the shortenings determine the crystal habit of the shortening and, hence, the potential creaming properties. For example, soybean oil exhibits the β polymorphic crystal form, whereas hydrogenated cottonseed oil is a β′ former. Therefore, soybean oil based shortenings requiring a plastic range and creaming properties are formulated with 5 to 20% of a β′ tending hardfat, such as cottonseed oil. The β′ hardfat must have a higher melting point than the soybean oil basestock in order for the entire shortening to crystallize in the stable β′ form. 4. Emulsifier level: One of the functions contributed by an emulsifier addition to a baking shortening is aeration. Some emulsifiers are better aerators than others, and the levels required vary greatly with the different emulsifiers. The creaming properties contributed by the emulsifier or emulsifier system will be improved with increased levels up to a point. Too high of an addition of emulsifiers will deaerate the product rather than promote more air entrapment by producing a weak batter emulsion or cell structure in the finished product. 5. Nonuniform consistency: Improper chilling, working, and tempering conditions can produce shortening or margarine with nonuniform consistencies that could be described as having a streaky, sandy, ribby, puffy, separated, and petroleum jellylike appearance. One of the important crystallization prerequisites contributing to these conditions is the pressure at the chill unit, worker units, and filler. As a rule of thumb, the use of high pressures produces smoother, more uniform shortenings and margarine products. 6. Hydrophilic surfactant: The more hydrophilic emulsifiers should not be a part of a conventional shortening system if the product is to be melted because the incompatible emulsifier will separate from the liquid fat. These emulsifiers can be dispersed in plasticized shortenings if added to the heated fat with good agitation just prior to crystallization.46
632
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Problem: Low-Volume Cakes Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Methyl silicone: This additive effectively retards foam development during frying to extend the useful life of frying shortenings; however, because cake batters are also foams, the unintentional addition to a cake shortening will also retard the cake volume. Methyl silicone is effective at levels of less than 1.0 ppm, which indicates the extreme care that must be exercised when handling the product. 2. High emulsifier level: An over-emulsified cake will collapse from excessive aeration, which weakens the cell walls of the batter foam. This results in a low-volume cake or a dip in the center of each layer with a large, coarse cell structure. The most obvious corrective action is to reduce the emulsifier level or use an emulsifier with less aeration capability. 3. Low emulsifier level: Insufficient aeration is experienced with low emulsifier levels, which result in heavy, low-volume cakes. An increase in the emulsifier level should increase the batter aeration to produce a lighter cake with an increased volume.
Problem: Tunnels or Large Holes Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. High emulsifier level: Tunnels or large holes in a layer or pound cake are often attributed to excessive bottom heat during baking; however, this condition can be aggravated by the use of an emulsifier system that aerates the batters to produce low batter-specific gravities. The natural movement of the batter during baking is interrupted, which increases the incidences of tunnels or large holes in the baked cakes. A reduction in the emulsifier level or the addition of 1.0 to 2.0% lecithin will reduce the tunneling unless the cake formulation is too lean, in which case it could require reformulation.
Problem: Prepared-Mix Leavening Loss Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Free fatty acid increase: Acidity increase of the flour or meal in a prepared mix is accelerated by shortening. A leavening change or the loss of available carbon dioxide through bicarbonate decomposition occurs, which is roughly proportional to the rate of free fatty acid increase. Emulsified shortenings tend to accelerate this reaction, but harder base fats and emulsifiers are less conducive to this problem. 2. High moisture: Most leavening systems are activated by moisture. Shortenings with high moisture contents can reduce the shelf life of a leavened prepared mix considerably.
Troubleshooting
633
13.3.2 Frying Shortenings Problem: Excessive Foaming Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. No antifoamer added: Analytical methods to determine the presence of methyl silicone have a poor reliability and require a lengthy elapsed time for the result; therefore, the use of a reliable tracer that can be identified analytically rather easily is recommended. Mixing the antifoamer with a commercial antioxidant mixture provides a tracer and aids in the dispersion of the methyl silicone in oil. 2. Poor antifoamer dispersion: Methyl silicone is only dispersible in oil, not soluble. The following procedure has been successful in attaining good antioxidant dispersion when followed carefully. Agitate the methyl silicone with the antioxidant tracer and a small portion of the oil before addition to the product tank. Agitate the product tank for a minimum of 20 minutes before sampling to analyze for the tracer. During packaging, the supply tank must be continuously agitated until the oil level drops below the agitator. Last, case analysis should be performed to ensure that the antifoamer did not settle out of the product during the period when the agitator was shut off. 3. Soap contamination: Analysis of used and fresh frying shortening from a customer complaint should be performed. The presence of soap in the unused product indicates that the shortening was improperly refined and bleached or was processed in equipment that had been washed and improperly rinsed or neutralized. The absence of soap in the unused product with a soap content in the used product indicates either a customer fryer-washing procedure problem or introduction of a caustic material with the food being fried. Deep-fat fryers should always be rinsed thoroughly and neutralized with a weak acid, such as vinegar, after boiling out with a cleaning material. Some foods that are deep-fat fried have the potential for a caustic content because of the processing of the raw materials; for example, commercially prepared French fries are caustic rinsed to help remove the skin, and corn is steeped in a caustic solution to help remove the outer skin for the preparation of massa for tacos. Soap contamination of the frying fat accelerates foam development. 4. Emulsifier presence: Emulsifiers allow the mixing of water and oil to form an emulsion which promotes foaming in a deep-fat fryer. Emulsifiers could be introduced into a frying kettle by the commingling with an emulsified shortening before or during packaging, product mislabeling, or the use of the wrong shortening product for frying. Again, analysis of both unused and used product should identify the problem source. 5. Lauric and domestic oil blending: Immediate foaming in the deep-fat fryer is a result of blending low quantities of lauric oil with a domestic oil or vice versa. The blends can occur during transportation, during shortening processing, or in the customer’s fryer. In any case, immediate foaming is the result. Fatty acid composition analysis of the used and unused samples will identify this problem caused by the lauric fatty acid (C-12:0 content). 6. Wrong frying shortening used: Some examples of what happens when the wrong shortening is used for frying are provided here to illustrate the severity of this problem: (1) Oil high in polyunsaturates utilized in a low-usage situation develops foam much sooner than a more saturated shortening. (2) The use of a pan- and grill-
634
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
frying shortening for deep-fat frying will result in immediate foaming. Lecithin, the antisticking agent used in these products, causes immediate foaming in the deep fat fryer. (3) Emulsified shortenings smoke, foam, and develop off-flavors and odors when heated to frying temperatures. 7. Low turnover: Decreases in the quantity of food fried reduces the amount of frying shortening removed from the frying kettle by absorption into the fried foods; therefore, less fresh shortening is required to replenish the used shortening in the fryer. The lower replenishment quantity increases the polymerization level of the shortening in the fryer because it is exposed to heating for longer periods; polymerization contributes to foaming by holding the moisture captive. Forced oil turnover is practiced by some food operators to maintain the frying shortening quality at a constant level. In forced turnover, oil is removed from the fryer when the absorption is not enough to require the addition of a prescribed quantity of fresh shortening. 8. Overheating: High-temperature abuse of frying fats accelerates the polymerization rate of the frying media. Overheating could be caused by a faulty fryer thermostat or by deliberately frying at a high temperature. Polymerization contributes to foaming by holding the moisture captive. 9. Food fats contamination: Almost all fried foods contain fats that leach into the frying fat. This fat transfer causes changes in the frying fat that can be harmful; for example, a lauric oil transfer from a product previously fried in coconut oil will accelerate the foaming of a used shortening just as it would a fresh shortening. 10. Hot spots: Thin places on electric or gas tubes cause hot spots when heating. The higher temperature abuse in the hot spots initiates the deterioration process. The deterioration products formed promote further deterioration to initiate a chain reaction. The result is polymerization, as evidenced by gum formation, leading to eventual higher absorption and foaming.
Problem: Gumming or Polymerization Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. High iodine value frying oil: A high iodine value indicates that the oil has a high polyunsaturated fatty acid level. Polyunsaturated fatty acids polymerize more rapidly than either monounsaturated or saturated fatty acids. These products can be used successfully to fry foods in a high turnover situation, but will polymerize excessively in frying situations with less than a 1:1 turnover (replacement of enough oil after one day of frying to again fill the fryer), causing a buildup of gummy material on the fryer walls, which is most noticeable at the oil level. 2. Wrong shortening composition: Addition of an oil high in polyunsaturated fatty acids to a “heavy-duty” frying shortening will cause more kettle gumming because of the higher polymerization rate of the oil portion. Frying shortenings designated “heavy-duty” are usually hydrogenated to reduce the polyunsaturated fatty-acid content to a minimum for maximum frying stability. 3. Overheating: The gum buildup rate is proportionate to the temperature abuse (i.e., the higher the frying temperature, the quicker that gumming develops). Overheating can be caused by a faulty thermostat or deliberately frying at too high a temperature; hot spots are caused by thin walls in the gas flue, uneven heating caused by faulty electric coils, temperature recovery drifts being too high, and other causes.
Troubleshooting
635
4. Antifoamer omission: Methyl silicone inhibits polymerization, which increases the viscosity of the oil to eventually cause the oil to trap the moisture from the food being fried and cause foaming. The omission of this additive will allow an early buildup of the gum deposits on the sides of the frying kettle and will eventually result in excessive foaming of the frying fat. Mixing the antifoamer with an antioxidant mixture provides the possibility for a tracer analysis during packaging, which is not possible without the antioxidant. This analytical capability offers the shortening processor a control to help ensure that the antifoamer has been added. 5. Infrequent fryer cleaning: Some gum buildup occurs even with the most stable frying shortenings. These gum deposits are usually removed by routine fryer boilouts; however, the buildup will become more noticeable with longer times between fryer cleanings. The following cleaning procedure has been used successfully to clean and neutralize deep-fat fryers: a. Drain the frying shortening from the fryer. b. Fill the fryer with water to the usual frying fat level. c. Add a fryer cleaner at the manufacturer’s recommended strength. d. Bring the cleaning solution to a boil, being careful that the water does not foam over the fryer sides. Turn the heat off when the foam starts to rise. Repeat boiling until all of the gummy deposits are loose. e. Scrub the top and sides of the fryer with a sink brush or scrub pad to remove deposits. Do not use a metal sponge or wire brush. These utensils will scratch the fryer surface, will cause future cleaning problems, and may promote frying fat breakdown by exposing copper or brass to the hot oil. Drain part of the water and scrub the exposed sides of the fryer. Repeat this procedure until only a small amount of water remains in the bottom of the fryer, and scrub the bottom surface. f. Rinse the fryer with clear water. g. Refill the fryer with clear water. h. Add 1 pint of 50-grain vinegar to each 40 pounds of water in the fryer. i. Bring the vinegar water solution to a rolling boil. j. Turn the heat off after boiling. Splash the vinegar water over all surfaces where soapy water could have contacted the fryer. k. Drain and discard the vinegar water solution. l. Rinse the fryer with clear water. m. Dry the fryer surfaces thoroughly with paper towels. Paper towels should be used to avoid lint and possible soap residue from cloth towels. n. Fill the fryer with fresh shortening or used shortening that is still in satisfactory condition. 6. Heating too rapidly: Plasticized shortening must be heated slowly at 200°F (93°C) until the voids or pockets are filled with melted fat and the creaming gas has been eliminated from the shortening. If the melting process is not carried out with gentle heat, portions of shortening in contact with the elements and fryer walls will be overheated. The high-temperature abuse causes polymerization and gumming. 7. Hot spots: Areas of excessively high temperatures can be caused by thin places on gas flues or electric elements, allowing greater heat transfer in an isolated spot, which accelerates the frying fat breakdown process. Polymerization, which increases the viscosity of the frying fat, results in gum formation on the kettle sides at the oil surface level and foaming. Inspection of the flues or elements dur-
636
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
ing cleaning should help identify a possible problem before it becomes a major problem. 8. Too strong vent draft: A strong vent draft will remove the protective steam blanket above the hot fat in the fryer, which results in an increased rate of oxidation. Fryer vent draft controls should be adjusted to retain the steam blanket as long as possible, but still remove steam and cooking odors before they become excessive. 9. Trace metals: Brass, copper, Monel™ metal, and copper-bearing alloys are prooxidants that exert a marked catalytic effect to accelerate frying fat breakdown. Trace quantities of these prooxidants can be introduced by the food being fried, the frying equipment, or contact of the frying shortening with these metals before addition to the frying kettle. The trace metals accelerate oxidation of the frying shortening, which is the combination of oxygen with the unsaturated fatty acids, causing offflavor and odor development with color darkening. Oxidation precedes polymerization of the unsaturated fatty acids in the frying shortening.
Problem: Darkening during Frying Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Oxidation: The combining of oxygen with the unsaturated fatty acids causes offflavors and odors, as well as darkening. Control of the frying conditions can reduce the rate of oxidation but cannot eliminate it. 2. Emulsifier presence: Frying shortenings should never contain emulsifiers, which accelerate darkening, smoking, and other frying fat deterioration. Possible sources of the emulsifier could be contamination with an emulsified shortening during processing, improper labeling of the shortening product, or use of an emulsified shortening by the frying operator either in error or on purpose. The possible contamination during processing should be eliminated by investigation of free fatty acid increases at any stage after deodorization. Another control is first and last package evaluation during the packaging operation; any real change in analytical characteristics should be immediately investigated. Control of the labeling process is the responsibility of the line operators and supervisors, who must follow established quality practices in determining the proper product identification. The shortening processor should supply distributors and customers with product performance information regarding the proper use of the different products. 3. Antioxidants: Some antioxidants, especially propyl gallate, accelerate the darkening of frying fats at frying temperatures. Use of propyl gallate as a frying fat antioxidant should be avoided, and other antioxidants should be used at the lowest possible level necessary. Antioxidants protect frying shortenings from oxidation only until they are heated to frying temperature. It is advantageous to use the antioxidants as a tracer for the antifoamer addition during processing; however, the minimum antioxidant quantities should be used to avoid darkening of the fat in the frying kettle. 4. High frying temperature: Frying fat darkening is accelerated with increases in frying temperatures. The foodservice frying temperature used for most foods is 325 to 375°F (162.7 to 190.6°C).
Troubleshooting
637
5. Wrong shortening used: Pan and grill shortenings have been mistaken for deepfat frying shortenings, resulting in rapid darkening when heated to frying temperature. Pan and grill shortenings contain lecithin as an antisticking agent, which will darken at a relatively low temperature, smoke, and have an offensive odor. Most pan and grill products are yellow in color, which should alert the deep-fat fryer operator that the wrong product has been added to the fryer. 6. Faulty fryer thermostat: Overheating accelerates the darkening of frying shortenings. Early smoking alerts experienced frying operators of this problem. 7. High egg product: Eggs yolks contain phospholipids, or lecithin, the same natural emulsifier used in pan and grill shortenings as an antisticking agent. Leaching of the phospholipids into the frying shortening will cause darkening, smoking, and an offensive odor when they decompose at frying temperatures. 8. Inadequate filtering: Infrequent or no filtering leaves food particles in the fryer that burn and carbonize, thus causing darkening of the frying shortening as well as off-flavors. 9. Poor cleaning practices: A soap residue from improper neutralization after cleaning accelerates frying fat breakdown, which is accompanied by darkening. Rinsing with a weak acid (vinegar) solution will neutralize the possibility of a soap residue. 10. Hot spots: Areas of excessively high temperatures can be caused by thin places on gas flues or electric elements, allowing greater heat transfer in an isolated spot, which accelerates frying fat darkening and breakdown. Inspection of the flues or elements during cleaning should help identify a possible problem before it becomes a major problem. 11. Slow fat turnover: Frying fat is continually removed from the frying kettle by absorption into the food being fried. To maintain a constant quality of frying fat in the kettle, fresh fat must be added to replace the fat removed by the food. The rate at which fresh fat is added is designated as fat turnover. Rapid fat turnover keeps the frying fat in good condition through frequent replenishment with fresh fat; however, a slow fat turnover exposes the fat to frying temperatures for longer periods, which results in a darker color fat caused by oxidation and other frying fat deterioration. In a slow fat turnover situation, the frying fat must be discarded more frequently or measures taken to improve the frying fat take-away. Forced turnover, or the daily replacement of a specific quantity of frying fat, has been successful for some operations. Another alternative has been the replacement of a large fryer with a smaller capacity fryer to improve turnover. 12. Gum formation: Gum or polymerized fat deposited on the frying equipment tends to catalyze the formation of more gums, as well as to contribute to foaming and color increase of the fat. Regular cleaning of the frying equipment by boiling with a detergent solution and frequent wiping down of the equipment will help minimize this problem. 13. Food preservatives: Prepared French-cut and other potato products will discolor or turn brown with exposure. Several preservatives are used to prevent the occurrence of this product discoloration before frying. Too strong a concentration of these preservatives, excessive soaking in the preservative solution, or inadequate draining after treatment can accelerate frying fat deterioration. 14. High-sugar foods: Sugars can transfer from foods to the frying fat. The sugars caramelize at frying temperatures, causing darkening and off-flavors to develop rapidly.
638
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
Problem: Excessive Free Fatty Acid Development Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Excessive chelating agent: Citric acid levels above 50 ppm and phosphoric acid levels above 10 ppm can catalyze free fatty acid development in the frying shortening during frying. The deodorizer addition systems should be calibrated routinely, and the acid/water solution should be prepared carefully. 2. Emulsifier presence: Addition of an emulsified shortening to the fryer will accelerate fat breakdown. Emulsifiers could be inadvertently added to the frying kettle by commingling of a frying and emulsified shortening before or during packaging, product mislabeling, or use of the wrong shortening by the operator. Analysis of unused fresh shortening from the same lot and the used shortening should be performed to identify the problem source. One indication of this problem is a high free fatty acid level. Strengthening of the quality assurance requirements in the producing plant should help prevent a reoccurrence of the commingling problem, and reeducation of the operator regarding proper frying procedures should help retain a customer. 3. High-moisture foods: Hydrolysis causes free fatty acid development; therefore, the more moisture introduced to the fryer, the higher the free fatty acid development. Food moisture levels can be controlled by drying soaked foods such as French fries as thoroughly as possible before introduction into the fryer. 4. Poor fryer cleaning practices: Soap residue in a fryer accelerates free fatty acid development of the frying shortening. A weak acid solution (vinegar) rinse after cleaning will neutralize any soap residue remaining after cleaning, eliminating the possibility of soap residue problem. 5. Low turnover: Free fatty acid will be maintained at a level dependent on the amount of fresh shortening added to the fryer daily. If enough fresh shortening is added to completely replenish the fryer every three days, the free fatty acid should be maintained at a satisfactory level for most fried foods. If the replenishment level drops below this point, the free fatty acid level will probably increase to a level at which the flavor of the fried food is affected. Frying shortening should be discarded at the first indication that the fried food flavor is beginning to change. The time before discarding is necessary will be longer in high-turnover situations and shorter in low-turnover situations. 6. Drip back from exhaust vent: The material that collects on fryer exhaust vents is concentrated free fatty acids. If this material is allowed to drip back into the fryer, it will substantially increase the free fatty acid level, which results in excessive smoke and gives a bitter, acid flavor to the food being fried. This material also collects on the underside of the lid of a pressure fryer. The pressure fryer lids should be wiped clean after each use to keep from contaminating the food being fried. 7. Abused fat addition: Some operators attempt to forego the frying fat break-in period by adding used fat to fresh shortening after a complete change of frying shortening. This addition increases the free fatty acid content, which provides more food browning than 100% fresh shortening. Other operators attempt to use this technique to improve their food costs by blending some of the normally discarded shortening with fresh product. This practice has no sound economic basis because the degraded fat contains all of the ingredients required to bring about rapid breakdown of the fresh fat.
Troubleshooting
639
8. Batter type: Free fatty acid development is increased with foods fried with batters containing egg yolks. Egg yolks contain phospholipids, which decompose at frying temperatures to cause darkening and an increase in free fatty acid. A positive correlation was found between the percentage of free fatty acid and color darkening in studies at Brigham Young University.47
Problem: Excessive Smoking Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. High free fatty acid: The smoke point of frying shortening decreases in direct relation to the increases in free fatty acid; therefore, if the free fatty acid is controlled, smoking should not be a problem. See the free fatty acid section directly above for causes and corrective actions. 2. Emulsifiers present: The presence of an emulsifier in any shortening significantly lowers the smoke point. Excessive smoking shortly after heating to frying temperature is an indication that an emulsifier may be present. The causes and corrective actions for the presence of emulsifiers in a frying shortening are covered in the section addressing free fatty acid problems. 3. Inadequate filtration: Breading, batters, small food pieces, and other materials that fall off the food being fried are contaminants for the frying shortening and char and smoke if allowed to remain in the fryer. Frying shortenings should be filtered with a dependable filter at least once per day. 4. Shortening package liner: Shortening plastic liners accidentally dropped into a fryer have caused smoking, foaming, and darkening of the frying fat. The frying shortening should be discarded and the fryer thoroughly cleaned after an accident of this type to prevent potential harm to customers.26
Problem: High Fat Absorption into the Fried Food Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Low frying temperature: Fried foods absorb fat at a rapid rate until the outside surface is sealed. The seal or crust is achieved by caramelization of the sugars and starches of the food by the heat transfer. Therefore, the time required to develop a seal materially affects the fat absorption rate. The frying temperature should be adjusted to seal the food as quickly as possible, but still cook the inside of the product. 2. Fryer load: Excessive food loads extend the heat recovery time, which causes a low frying temperature situation. Excessive fryer loads can increase the frying time to more than twice the normal length of time required to fry the food. The recommended deep-fat frying load is a maximum of 1 pound of food for each 7 pounds of frying shortening. 3. Shortening level: Frying with low shortening levels affects both the frying shortening and the food being fried. The food being fried can be grease soaked, soggy, or limp because of a slow temperature recovery from the increase in the ratio of fryer load to frying fat. Frequent addition of fresh shortening to maintain the desired level reduces the breakdown rate by dilution.
640
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
4. Frozen foods: All frozen foods should be thawed before frying to facilitate heat recovery and to remove excess moisture. The colder temperatures of the frozen foods will extend the time before the desired frying temperature is achieved, thus increasing the fat absorption. Excessive moisture will increase the breakdown rate of the frying shortening through hydrolysis, which also increases the fat absorption rate. 5. Foaming shortening: Foods fried in a foaming shortening are submerged in the foam layer rather than the liquid fat. The foam layer contributes a much lower level of heat transfer than usual deep-fat frying which extends the frying time and increases the fat absorption. Foaming frying shortenings should be discarded and replaced with fresh product. 6. Slow fryer recovery: The fryer temperature is lower than desired during the recovery time after the food is dropped into the frying fat. The lower frying temperature causes greater fat absorption into the fried food, which increases with time; the longer the recovery rate, the higher the fat absorption. Recovery rates are a function of the fryer thermostat. A routine check of the fryer recovery time and replacement of thermostats with slow recovery times will help ensure that a uniform quality product is served. 7. High moisture: Frying starts as soon as the food is immersed into the hot frying fat and an exchange of heat from the hot fat to the cold food begins. The temperature of the fat drops, and the temperature of the food rises. The moisture in the food starts to evaporate and the resulting steam causes a temporary bubbling on the fat surface as it escapes into the air. The steam emission temperature is only 212°F even though the frying fat is at a higher temperature of at least 300°F. As long as this process continues, the temperature of the food will not exceed 212°F. Thus, it is necessary to evaporate all of the moisture from the outer surface of the food before the sealing process begins; therefore, foods with higher moisture levels extend the low-temperature frying time, increase the fryer temperature recovery time, and accelerate the hydrolysis rate. All foods should be drained properly to be as dry and free of excess moisture as possible before frying. 8. Hot spots: Areas of excessively high temperatures can be caused by thin places on gas flues or electric elements that allow greater heat transfer in an isolated spot, thus accelerating the frying fat deterioration process. The result is polymerization, as evidenced by gum formation that leads to eventually higher absorption and foaming. Inspection of the flues or elements during cleaning should help identify a possible problem before it becomes a major problem. 9. Batter type: Foods utilizing egg and baking powder batters have higher levels of fat absorption. Both egg yolk and baking powder increase the porosity of the batter, creating more voids and increasing the surface area available for fat absorption.
Problem: Off-Flavor Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Source oils: Each source oil has a characteristic flavor, which it reverts to when abused; some are more objectionable than others. The flavor stability of each oil is dependent on the level of polyunsaturated fatty acids in most cases. The unsaturated fatty acids combine with oxygen and revert to their original flavor profile. The intensity of the flavor reversion depends on the amount of oxidation. Therefore, the
Troubleshooting
641
selection of the source oil is an important consideration for the flavor of the finished product, especially if the oil has not been hydrogenated to reduce the unsaturated fatty acids. In some cases, the characteristic flavor of an oil is desirable, for example, a peanut-oil flavor is supposedly characteristic for English fish and chips. 2. Lauric oils: Coconut, palm kernel oil, and other high lauric fatty acid oils are quite resistant to oxidation, but are more prone to hydrolysis than most other fats and oils. This characteristic creates a characteristic soapy flavor that is imparted to the food being fried. If oxidative stability of these oils is desired, the flavor of the fried food must be monitored closely to determine the replacement point for the frying oil; the normal indicators used by foodservice operators do not indicate when lauric frying oils should be discarded. 3. Melting point: The melting point of the frying shortening will influence the mouth feel of the fried food when it is eaten. A high melting point can mask the flavor of the fried food, which can be desirable or undesirable. The effect of the melting point should be one of the selection criteria used to decide which frying oil or shortening to use. 4. Solid fat index: This analytical tool is a measurement of the percent solids at certain temperatures, usually 50, 70, 80, 92, and 104°F. The solids level at body temperature is an important indicator of the effect on mouth feel and flavor of the fried food. High solids at 92°F will naturally mask the food flavors or delay the flavor impact. Low solids at 92°F will allow the flavor of the food to come through almost immediately. A steep SFI is desirable for most frying shortenings where frying stability and flavor are both desired; high solids at 50, 70, and 80°F that decrease rapidly to only 1 or 2% at 104°F are characteristic of a steep SFI. 5. Multipurpose frying: Food flavor transfer from one fried product to another will occur if the same fryer is used for multipurpose frying. The flavor transfer can be minimized by frying potatoes between high-flavor foods. Potatoes have a high moisture content and provide a steam distillation effect that deodorizes the fat or carries off the flavor components. 6. High free fatty acid: Both hydrolysis-caused fat splitting and the presence of other acidic materials will analyze as free fatty acid by the usual titration method. Free fatty acids from either source contribute an offensive tart or acidic flavor to the fried food. Causes of and corrective actions for free fatty acid development are listed in the section discussing excessive free fatty acids. 7. Inadequate filtration: Food particles left in the heated frying fat will continue to caramelize and develop a burnt offensive flavor that will be transferred to the food being fried in the same oil. The frying fat should be filtered at least daily with a filter aid that will trap the fine contaminants in the oil. 8. Improper filter media: The filter aid or earth used with the mechanical filter should be evaluated thoroughly before use. Some materials are very effective at removing the food particles and even reducing the free fatty acid level, but impart an off-flavor to the frying fat that is carried through to the food being fried. 9. Inadequate skimming: The frying fat surface should be skimmed frequently to remove the small food pieces remaining in the fryer. These food particles will char and stick to fresh product being fried, giving off offensive flavors. 10. Addition of used grill- or pan-frying fats: Some operators add used fats accumulated from their grill or pan frying to the deep-fat fryer, expecting to save on additions of fresh frying shortening. This practice speeds up the deterioration of the
642
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
deep-fat frying shortening and gives the food being fried a strange flavor or a flavor different than what the customer expects. 11. Air exposure: Care must be exercised during the filtration process to avoid aeration of the hot oil. Oxidation rates are accelerated by the higher temperatures necessary to keep the fat liquid during filtering. The filter pump should be turned off as soon as the first sign of aeration is evident. Also, the oil should not be allowed to cascade into the fryer; the return line should be placed on the bottom of the fryer beneath the oil surface as soon as possible. Oxidation reverts the frying fat back to the original flavor of the source oil. 12. Copper or brass: Both of these metals are strong prooxidants that accelerate the oxidation process to revert the frying fat back to the original flavor, which immediately carries through to the fried food. Fryer coils, thermocouples, and other fryer parts probably are copper or brass alloys coated with stainless steel. The fryer must be inspected routinely to ensure that the stainless steel has not worn through with cleaning to expose these prooxidants to the frying fat. Also, fryer repairs with copper or brass materials should be avoided. 13. Foaming fat: Foaming frying fat is evidence that it is completely broken down and should not be used to fry food for human consumption. Additionally, the flavor and mouth feel of any food being fried would be offensive. The causes and corrective actions for frying fat foaming are presented in the excessive foaming section. 14. High temperature: In addition to accelerating the breakdown of the frying shortening, the fried food will not be prepared properly with high temperatures. The exterior of the food will be done whereas the center will still be raw. The usual foodservice frying temperature is 350 to 360°F, but large food pieces require a longer frying time, probably at a reduced frying temperature. 15. Low temperature: Fat absorption is increased by low-temperature frying. It is necessary to absorb some fat to produce the desired character and eating qualities. It is the absorbed fat and browning that impart the flavor to fried foods that no other form of cooking develops, but excessive absorption caused by deteriorated fat or improper frying imparts an objectionable mouth feel and flavor. The potential causes for low-temperature frying include: (1) faulty thermostat, (2) poor heat recovery, (3) operator error, or (4) poor frying procedures. 16. Slack period heating: Keeping the fryer at frying temperature for one hour with no food being fried will break down the frying fat more than several hours of actual frying. When not in use, the temperature of the fat should be lowered as much as possible to a point where the temperature will recover quickly when needed. Frying equipment with capacities in excess of the requirements accelerate frying shortening degradation, especially during slack periods. The purchase of multiple fryers instead of one large unit would allow the operator to shut down entire fryers during slack periods, thereby reducing frying fat deterioration. 17. Poor turnover: Frying turnover is the relationship between the amount of fat added over a period of a day to the total amount of fat present in the fryer. If the turnover is low, the fat deteriorates at a higher rate. If the turnover is rapid, the fat deterioration is lessened due to fresh frying fat being added to replenish the amount absorbed into the food being fried. All frying fat deterioration negatively affects the fried food flavor and should be kept to a minimum. 18. Improper cleaning practices: Minute residual traces of cleaning agents will catalyze frying fat deterioration. Thorough rinsing with a weak acid solution, such as
Troubleshooting
643
1 pint of 50-grain vinegar to 5 gallons water, will neutralize any remaining alkali residue after cleaning. 19. Food size: Equivalent-size food pieces must be fried so that the entire batch can be fried uniformly. Frying small and large food pieces together in a fryer will necessitate removal of the food pieces at different times to achieve a uniform flavor and appearance. 20. Fresh frying oil: In most snack frying operations, the analytical values of the oil do not approach equilibrium until after four turnovers. The bland flavor of fresh snack frying oils will dilute and diminish the flavor of fried snacks during the early stages of frying until equilibrium is attained.48
Problem: Chemical Odor Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Antioxidants: On heating to frying temperature, an odor described as chemical may be attributed to the use of antioxidants. Many of the antioxidants, such as BHA, have strong phenolic odors that become more pronounced as these compounds are volatilized with high-temperature heating.
Problem: Food Appearance Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Burnt food particles: Burnt food particles suspended in the frying medium tend to impart a bitter taste as well as an objectionable speckled appearance to the fried products, which increases with the quantity of burnt particles present. Daily or continuous filtering with a filter capable of removing the suspended food particles is necessary to preserve the quality of the frying fat. 2. Abused fat addition: Some operators attempt to forego the frying fat break-in period by adding used frying fat to fresh shortening after a complete change. This addition increases the free fatty acid content, which provides more food browning than does all fresh shortening. Other operators attempt to reduce their food costs by saving and later adding some of the normally discarded shortening. This practice has no sound economic or performance basis because the degraded fat contains all of the ingredients required to bring about rapid breakdown of the fresh fat. Additionally, the performance improvement is too limited to justify the more rapid degradation of the fresh shortening. 3. Oily or shiny food: Foods fried in a frying oil that is liquid at room temperature will have a more oily and shiny appearance than foods fried in a fat that is solid at room temperature. 4. Dry or dull appearance: Frying fats that are solid at room temperature impart a drier food appearance than liquid oils. The fried food appearance will become duller as the melting point of the frying fat increases. The desired fried food appearance can be achieved by choosing the frying medium that provides the desired performance. 5. Food size: Uniform food pieces must be fried so that all of the food will be done at the same time. Frying small and large pieces together in a fryer will necessitate removal of the food pieces at different times to achieve a uniform flavor and appearance.
644
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
6. High temperature: Deep-fat frying at a high temperature will produce a seal or crust on the food surface quicker than lower temperatures and will retain more moisture; however, the heat transfer time required to cook the food completely may produce a darker crust color than desired. The lowest frying temperature that produces food that is completely cooked and has a pleasing appearance must be determined for each operation. Normally, the desired restaurant frying temperature will fall between 325 and 360°F (162.8 to 182.2°C).
Problem: Immediate Foaming Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Creaming gas: Plasticized shortenings have creaming gas or nitrogen incorporated for better handling properties. On heating in the fryer, the inert gas will be liberated. This deaeration process could be misinterpreted as foam development, especially if the fresh shortening is being rapidly heated to frying temperature. The large clear bubbles will cease after the gas has been liberated, probably long before the shortening reaches frying temperature. The foam caused by frying shortening deterioration is characterized by small, yellowish bubbles that do not break or dissipate until the food is removed from the fryer. 2. Lauric and domestic oil blending: Immediate foaming in the deep-fat fryer can be caused by low quantities of lauric oils, such as coconut or palm kernel oil blended with a domestic oil or vice versa. A blend of this nature can occur during fats and oils transportation, processing, or in the customer’s fryers, but no matter how the blending occurs immediate foaming is the result. This problem cause can be identified by fatty acid composition analysis of used and unused shortening to determine the C-12:0 or lauric fatty acid content.
13.4 MARGARINE AND SPREAD PRODUCTS Problem: High Bacteria Determinations Bacteria are one-celled plants, ranging in size from about 1/75,000 to 1/10,000 inch in diameter and from 1/25,000 to 1/5000 inch in length. Bacteria reproduce by simple asexual cell division; one cell alone can reproduce by cell division. Bacteria need food, moisture, and heat to grow. They are not mobile and have to be transported from place to place, most often by people’s hands, shoes, and clothes; thus the best preventive measures are good manufacturing practices. Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Coliform: Some members of the coliform group are found in the intestines of all warm-blooded animals. They are not generally considered as pathogenic (disease producing), but rather as “fellow travelers” with intestinal pathogens. They do not survive pasteurization; therefore, the presence of coliform in pasteurized product suggests unsanitary conditions or practices during production, processing, or storage. Coliform testing measures the quality of sanitation procedures.
Troubleshooting
645
2. Standard plate count: Total plate count is valuable as a sanitation indicator and for quality information. The bacteria that grow at the total plate count incubation temperature are known as mesophiles and include a wide variety of microorganisms. The medium used is nutrient rich and nonselective. Both pathogenic and nonpathogenic organisms may be present. 3. Yeast and mold: Yeast and mold have very similar growth parameters. Both are able to survive extremes in conditions, such as pH, water activity, and concentrations of sugar, which most bacteria cannot tolerate. Because yeast and mold can survive such conditions, they are important spoilage organisms in margarine and spread products. The presence of yeast and mold in these product indicates poor sanitation practices. 4. Thermophile: The term thermophile is used to describe a group of microorganisms that grow in the 131 to 194°F (55 to 80°C) range. These organisms are very heat resistant and can cause spoilage of product. They will grow into spores if held at elevated temperatures or if the product is improperly cooled. 5. Pathogenic microorganisms: A pathogen is an organism that causes disease. The two types that are of interest for margarine and spread production are infections and intoxications. Salmonella enteritidis, Escherichia coli, and Listeria are infectious organisms that can grow in margarine-type products. These live organisms are poisonous to humans and cause food poisoning when they are ingested. The other organism that poses a problem is Staphylococcus aureus. Some strains of S. aureus produce a toxin that is poisonous to humans when ingested. Pasteurization will kill the organism, but once the toxin has been formed, it remains active. This is the reason why hand contamination of product after pasteurization can have very critical results.
Problem: Emulsion Problems Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Emulsion inversion: It is important that the aqueous and oil phases are similar in temperature and that water phase is added to the oil phase to promote a water-in-oil emulsion. The rate of water addition has little effect on a margarine emulsion, but is critical for spreads. It is essential that the rate of water addition for spreads be reduced, especially in the early stages of emulsion preparation to prevent emulsion inversion. Care must also be exercised to avoid air incorporation during emulsification to prevent inversion. 2. Agitation rate: Higher agitation rates are required for spreads than margarine to ensure homogeneity because of the inherent viscosity of a high internal phase emulsion. 3. Formulation: It is more difficult to produce spreads or low fat margarines with protein (milk or whey solids) than without it as proteins act as oil-in-water emulsifiers.49
Problem: Margarine with Grainy or Sandy Texture Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1.Content and processing: Certain formulations and process conditions may lead to a margarine with a grainy or sandy texture:50 a. Formulated with only one source oil
646
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
b. c. d. e.
Blends of palm oil and lard Blends with a tendency to crystallize in the β polymorphic form Slow crystallization Widely fluctuating storage temperatures
Problem: Margarine Package Problems Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Package defects: Dented or crushed cartons, oil spots on the carton, and inadequate carton-flap gluing are all operator adjustment problems that must be corrected upon occurrence to ensure quality packaging.
Problem: Soft Tub Margarine Appearance Defects Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Short fill: Weight control problems or insufficient nitrogen gas are causes for short fills. 2. Sloshed fill: High fill temperature, high line speed, rough handling by the case packers, and use of the wrong margarine oil are causes for sloshed fills. 3. Dull surface sheen: Warm fill temperatures can result in oil separation or a dull surface sheen when the product solidifies. 4. Cheesy texture: A cheesy texture can be caused by insufficient back pressure on the cooling system, chilling temperature being too cold, or insufficient product throughput. 5. Streaking: Channeling in the chilling unit causes margarine streaking. The streaked area represents the portion that received insufficient cooling. 6. Grainy texture: Margarine transitions to the β-crystal with higher temperature storage is evidenced by grainy textures. Margarines should always be stored at 45°F (± 5°F) (7.2°C (± 2.8°C)). 7. Surface darkening: Moisture evaporation leaves an outer layer with a higher fat content that contains the coloring material. Addition of titanium dioxide is claimed to minimize the change in optical properties as the moisture evaporates. Packaging with a heat seal or a tight-fitting lid has also solved this problem.
Problem: Soft Tub Margarine Consistency Problems Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Too firm at filler: Reduce the chilling-unit outlet temperature or increase the amount of working to produce a softer consistency. 2. Too firm at filler or post-packaging: Palm oil blends have been found to set up too firm in quiescent tubes, or severe postpackaging hardening may occur due to a slow crystallization rate. A slowly agitated working unit between the chilling units to provide a two to three minute residence time for crystallization has produced a more acceptable margarine consistency.51
Troubleshooting
647
3. Course, sandy texture: Margarine and spreads formulated with a strong β-crystal tending oil, like canola oil, develop a course, sandy texture over time. This tendency can be suppressed by (1) the addition of a partially hydrogenated β′ basestock like cottonseed oil; (2) 0.3 to 0.5% sorbitan tristearate; (3) by using several selectively hydrogenated β-tending basestocks; or (4) interesterification of some or all of the β-tending components.52 4. High palm oil formulation: Slow crystallization leading to graininess and posthardening can be caused by high quantities of palm oil in the formulation. Examination of the triglyceride structure has provided the likely reasons for this problem; the symmetrical to asymmetrical triglyceride ratio, the high level of the POP triglyceride, and the high level of diglycerides. Interesterification of palm oil significantly changes the proportion of POP triglyceride to give a faster crystallization rate. 5. Small rice-like grains at filler: The grainy consistency can be caused by a chillunit temperature being too low or by precrystallization. Soft margarine consistency can be physically evaluated at the filler to determine when slight increases in the chiller outlet temperature have provided a smooth consistency. The remelt temperature of return product should be 10°F (5.5°C) above the melting point of the margarine oil to prevent precrystallization. 6. Oil separation or shiny surface: Reduce the chilling unit outlet unit temperature or reduce the amount of working to produce a more plastic margarine.
Problem: Stick Margarine Processing Problems Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Brittle or too firm consistency: Reduce the chilling-unit outlet temperature to produce a softer consistency or increase the amount of working. 2. Grainy consistency: Increase the remelt temperature of the returned produce to preclude precrystallization or reduce the chilling-unit outlet temperature. 3. Open structure: Make sure that the emulsion tank agitator is not vortexing and incorporating air. 4. Greasy: This condition can be corrected by reducing the amount of working by reducing either worker rpm or time. 5. Firm Consistency: Palm oil blends have been found to set up too firm in quiescent tubes, or severe postpackaging hardening may occur due to a slow crystallization rate. A slowly agitated working unit between the chilling units to provide a two to three minute residence time for crystallization has produced a more acceptable margarine consistency.51 6. Oil soaked parchment: Stick margarine merchandised outside of refrigerated cases must have a higher 70°F (21.1°C) solid fat index to compensate for the higher temperature conditions.
Problem: Liquid Margarine Processing Problems Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Separation in layers after packaging: Emulsion stability can be improved by (1) more violent agitation in the emulsion supply tank, (2) lowering the chill-unit outlet
648
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
temperature, (3) longer working after chilling, or (4) prolonging crystallization time after chilling before filling.
Problem: Spread Plasticization Problems Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Separation: Low fat emulsions have been found to be sensitive to the chill unit line pressure and cooling rate. Also, early crystallization of the fat crystal causes high shearing forces, which break down the emulsion. 2. Fill Temperature: Normally, spreads require a higher fill temperature than standardized margarine with 80% fat because the emulsion is more viscous. Low fill temperatures cause the product to mound in the container, which can experience water separation during packaging and/or become crumbly after packaging. 3. Formulation: Low fat spreads containing high liquid oil contents and a corresponding low SFI produce most consistent performance due to a greater viscosity. 4. Emulsification: The use of a combination of mono- and diglycerides and polyglycerol ester emulsifiers with a seeding component results in wider processing latitude and enhanced finished product stability. An effective emulsifier/stabilizer blend for spreads is 0.6% intermediate hardness mono-and diglycerides, 0.1 to 0.2% polyglycerol ester, and 0.3 to 1.0% saturated β′ hardfat.
Problem: Weight Control Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Moisture loss after packaging: Moisture loss during shelf life must be considered in determining the fill weight to ensure that the product remains in compliance with existing net weight regulations during the product’s shelf life. The various packaging materials utilized provide different degrees of protection from moisture loss. Moisture loss is much greater for parchment than foil-wrapped sticks and plastic tubs offer the greatest protection, especially with tight-fitting lids or when heat-sealed.
Problem: Flavor and Mouth Feel Defects Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Improper storage: Margarines exposed to temperature cycling or high temperatures for prolonged periods develop a waxy mouth feel or a grainy texture. The higher melting triglycerides melt out of their stable β′ matrix and recrystallize as large discrete particles with β tendencies. An increase of 2 to 3°C (3.6 to 5.4°F) in melting point is experienced with the change from β′ to β crystals.53 Margarine stocks should be rotated on a first-in/first-out basis and held at refrigerated temperatures of 45°F (± 5°F). 2. Lack of flavor: A low flavor intensity can be caused by (1) the use of a low level of flavoring material, (2) a loss of flavor with age, (3) β-crystal development, and (4) use of a margarine oil with a high a melting point or a flat SFI curve.
Troubleshooting
649
3. Rancid flavor: Oxidized oil will impart a reverted oil or rancid flavor to the margarine. The oil used to prepare the margarine emulsion must have a good initial flavor and adequate oxidative stability for the product application. 4. Sour flavor: Sour margarine flavors usually result from the use of poor-quality milk. 5. Packaging flavors: A plastic aroma and flavor may be imparted by the plastic container used to package soft tub margarines. 6. Storage flavors: Fruity, artificial margarine flavors are generally caused by poor warehousing practices. Margarine should never be exposed to aromas from fruits, fresh vegetables, or any products. Margarines will readily absorb flavors and odors. 7. Old or aged margarine flavor: A musty-type flavor usually develops with old margarine.
13.5 QUALITY MANAGEMENT Problem: Specification Preparation Mistakes54,55 Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Including insignificant factors: Specifications frequently contain certain factors simply because they are known, not because they have any value. Unnecessary requirements confuse and sometimes contradict each other so that it becomes impossible to meet all of the specified limits. A good specification includes only those requirements that have a known significance. 2. Duplicate evaluations: Sometimes the same property is specified to be measured by several methods instead of the one method that is most valuable and best suited to routine determinations. Unimportant details detract from the value of essential factors. Also, imposing unnecessary requirements upon a supplier must be avoided. A specification should not require any more evaluations than absolutely necessary. 3. Not recognizing variability: The only property common to all ingredients is variability. A single value does not constitute a specification unless clearly shown to be a minimum or maximum. In all other cases, the property should be designated in terms of an acceptable range. This range should not be so narrow as to add cost or make compliance unduly difficult; however, it should be only as wide as end-use considerations can tolerate. Additionally, the variability resulting from the analytical method must not be overlooked. 4. Zero tolerances: These are almost always unrealistic, especially with the extremely sensitive analytical capabilities available today. If a zero limit is specified, it must be in terms of a particular sampling plan or analytical procedure; however, even in the case of a simple particle size measurement it is wise to allow at least a small tolerance for material that will remain on the most coarse screen or that will pass through the finest one. 5. Significant figures: Significant figures used in specifications must not go beyond the accuracy of the analytical method employed or the requirements of the end use. For example, a maximum of 1% often is assumed to mean a maximum of 1.0% or even 1.00%. This is not correct. A specified maximum of 1% really means that
650
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
1.499% is acceptable. Careful consideration must be given to the exact intended meaning when numbers are used in a specification. 6. Copying a supplier’s sales literature: This is the easiest way to prepare an ingredient or packaging specification. Unfortunately, it does not always result in the best specification and in some cases may be very inadequate. Suppliers’ specifications should always be carefully reviewed for compliance with the requirements of the finished product. 7. Identification of specific analytical methods: The method of measurement for each factor specified must be identified. One of the most common reasons for disagreement between customers and suppliers concerning the acceptability of a product is that each is measuring compliance by a different procedure. This is a real problem when numerous standard methods are available for a given measurement, such as moisture, melting point, and so on. 8. Omitting special instructions: Special instructions required of the supplier should be included on each individual specification, such as specific sampling, testing, and acceptance procedures, including preshipment samples, certificates of analysis, delivery temperature, and so forth. These special handling requirements prescribed by the customer should be clearly identified on each individual specification. 9. No specification revision provision: There is no such thing as a final specification; if there were, it would mean that we have stopped learning. Sometimes, a new specification must be changed shortly after it has been issued, even after extensive original study has been conducted to make it as perfect as possible. Even then, inadequacies appear as the ingredient is produced or used. On the basis of experience and new technology, every specification will eventually need to be revised. 10. Refusal to compromise or change: Getting exactly what is desired in an ingredient often is impossible. It may be necessary to work with what is available and build around it. Even after a specification has been prepared, the suppliers may find it impossible to comply with certain requirements, and this situation will require compromise, usually without detriment to either party. 11. Transferring a specification from one end use to another: An ingredient may be used in several products, and its function in each of these products may or may not be the same. Therefore, before an existing ingredient specification is considered adequate for a new use, it should be carefully reviewed to determine if the values and limits specified are appropriate for both products. Also, beware of reinstating an old specification, as the product may no longer be available or the performance limits may have changed. 12. Insufficient information: Realistically, the specification writer never has all the facts. The question is, then, has proper use been made of the available information? The writer must have some knowledge of how an ingredient is made, the characteristic properties, and the intended end use. This information gathering requires communication with those who have the information, usually the manufacturer and the product development and operations departments. 13. Specifying custom-made ingredients: Sometimes, a lack of knowledge of available ingredients or the required performance characteristics leads to specifications that identify an expensive custom-made product. A unique ingredient may be necessary on special occasions, but standard products that are readily available should be considered first. The developers and operations personnel initiating the requests for ingredients should consult with the specifications custodian early in their proj-
Troubleshooting
651
ects to avoid these problems. Likewise, the specification system should be friendly enough to avoid this type of confusion. 14. Timely results: All analytical results specified should be completed in time for necessary corrective actions to be taken before the ingredient is used or consumed. Testing that is completed after the ingredient is used is worse than no testing at all, unless it is done as an audit with no intent of taking any action as a result of the findings. 15. Incompatible analytical requirements: Many product analyses are interdependent; for example, iodine value is dependent on the fatty acid composition, melting points are extensions of the SFI, and AOM stability is dependent on the iodine value or fatty acid composition. Occasionally, the limits for a specification may be determined from an inaccurate laboratory analysis, an abnormal product, or just wishful thinking. These types of errors can make it impossible to qualify a supplier or they can contribute to excessive costs. 16. Vague requirements: Specifications must be exacting standards for the product, including all quality characteristics and composition, legal, and other requirements. Vague requirements, such as variable tolerances or including a recommendation rather than a directive, become obstacles to a clear understanding of what is needed. All specification requirements should be specific, well defined, explicit standards. 17. Specification clarity: Specifications are communication tools for all levels of management, suppliers, and operations personnel. Every entry should be easy to understand and impossible to misunderstand. 18. Umbrella method: Specifications are often prepared so that nobody is left out. Often, when preparing purchase specifications, the tendency is to accommodate the weakest supplier, but when production specifications are concerned, the tendency is to include ridged requirements desired by only one of the customers for that particular product. In both cases, specification limits must be established by utilizing data identifying the minimum requirements of the purchased product and capabilities of the process to produce a particular product. Purchased ingredients, process aids, and other adjuncts, as well as the internal processes, all must be considered in light of the finished product to be produced. 19. Tight limits: Specification limits set too tight just to gain or maintain a reputation for toughness, or hoping that production will meet them somehow, will result in a disregard for all specifications. Specification limits must be realistic for both the producer and the customer to prevent process interruptions or poor-quality product when critical characteristics are ignored. 20. Ostrich method: Specification limits cannot be changed to bring an out-of-control process into specification conformance. When the history of a product shows conformance to the design limits until a recent period, it indicates a serious process deficiency that should be addressed instead of changing the requirements to fit the poor performance. 21. Trivial versus important: The relative importance of the different parameters must be identified. Some characteristics are more critical to the acceptability of the product and may require a narrower range of acceptability. Others may have only minor importance and do not require as much attention. One method of conveying the importance of the requirements is to separate them into categories of critical, major, and minor. 22. Incomplete reason for change: Each specification sheet should have a “Reason for Change” section that summarizes all of the changes to the current issue. This section lists all the changes for the user, thus eliminating the need to study the
652
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
entire document to identify them. A partial listing in this section could cause a change to be overlooked. A further aid to identifying changes for personnel utilizing the specification is a “c” indicator in the right-hand margin in line with the actual change. 23. Packaging component coordination: Most packaging of edible fats and oils products consists of multiple components. These components all have variations in the final dimensions that could affect performance during packing and the product protection. The components must have a tight fit for product protection, but must assemble easily for high-speed packaging. The allowed specification tolerances must be coordinated for all of the components to prevent “in limits” parts assembly problems. 24. Processed product interchange: The process-control specification system treats the products from each process as a finished product. Each of these finished products may be the base product for another single product or for many other finished products. The single base product has to meet the requirements for only one product, but the multipurpose base must conform to the requirement of all the succeeding products. Product designers and specification developers must coordinate the process components to determine whether existing bases are satisfactory or a new basestock is required to adequately prepare the desired product. The specification developer must guard against the use of a basestock that will meet the finished product requirements only part of the time. 25. Establishment of specification tolerances: The best specification limits and tolerances are developed through determination of needs and capability. Specifications arrived at in this manner should assume the stature of an industrial law, in that they must be met and enforced; however, too few specification limits are based on performance data, but rather on consensus of opinion, compromise, or mutual distrust. Historical performance data provide the means for determining process capability and finished product requirements. The observations that can be made from the historical data include: a. The process will produce material that, for all measurable characteristics, has a central tendency: the average, median, or mean calculation of all the data points. b. The material will vary from the central tendency within certain limits, which can be determined by calculating the standard deviation. c. After the mean and standard deviation are identified, a probability can be established for the occurrence of material any measurable distance from the mean or center point. d. Whenever product is produced outside the specification limits established in this manner, it is known that chance alone has not caused the deviation, but some real deficiency exists that requires corrective action. e. New specifications should have temporary specified limits based on like products or pilot plant development work until a history is available to establish permanent limits. 26. Abbreviations: Shortened words should be avoided unless the abbreviation is recognized universally, not just within a plant or company. Even some abbreviations in use for long periods can cause errors. For example, IV has been used to abbreviate iodine value for quite some time, but it could be mistaken for the roman numeral IV in some cases. Another illustration is the use of GLC to mean fatty acid composition. GLC is actually an abbreviation of the equipment used to provide a fatty acid
Troubleshooting
653
composition and other analysis. Abbreviations can have too many different meanings to effectively communicate specification requirements.
Problem: Specification Enforcement Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Specification and practice conflicts: The “black book” of the foreman or operator must not take precedence over the official specification. Specifications must be regarded as company law. No one should have the right to deviate from the established specification without first securing either a change authorization or a temporary authority to deviate. 2. Wrong issue used: Replacement specification issues must replace the superseded issues promptly in all specification books to comply with product and customer changes as needed. Operations, quality control, costing, and other departments utilizing the specification network must devise a system to ensure that the most current specification issues are available and being utilized. One effective system requires the return of the superseded copies to a central point for check off and disposal. 3. Verbal changes: All specification changes must follow the designated specification change procedures. Verbal changes outside the established procedure almost always create problems, such as: a. The change is never communicated to some of the people who need to know. b. The change is never incorporated into the working system. c. Some people follow the change whereas others forget or ignore it. d. Verbal exchanges are easily misunderstood or forgotten, and the actual change implemented is different than desired. With the speed of the communications systems today, the need for a verbal specification change should not exist; however, the personnel managing the system must be prepared to react on short notice at times to preserve customer goodwill. 4. Deviations: Allowing deviations can have the effect of rewriting the specification. This creates a situation of having more than one source of the specification and in effect redesigns the product without authority. Once a specification has been issued it should be regarded as an industrial law. No one should have the right to deviate from the specification without first securing a specification change or, in isolated cases, permission for the deviation from quality assurance.
Problem: Complete New Specification Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Auxiliary requirements: With the pressure to issue a new product specification, the auxiliary requirements have a tendency to be overlooked at times. Utilization of a checklist enumerating all possible individual requirements helps avoid these oversights. The following list of questions should provide a start for the development of a new specification checklist: a. Are any additional intermediate product specifications required? If so, have they been prepared and approved?
654
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
b. Are purchase specifications available for all the ingredients, raw materials, and processing aids required with approved suppliers identified? c. Are the necessary packaging material specifications prepared for this product with approved vendors identified? d. Are any new analytical, inspection, or performance evaluation methods required for this new specification? If so, are acceptable methods developed and procedures written and is plant testing complete? e. Have the summary specifications been updated to include the requirements of this new specification? f. Does this product require certification from a governmental agency or a special-interest group?
Problem: Complaint Handling Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. System: Complaints are the voice of the customer and deserve careful attention. The critical point is to have a system whereby all complaints, regardless of source, come to a central collection point where well-documented procedures for followthrough are understood and enforced. All complaints should be tabulated and receive continuing review by quality assurance and operations. 2. Procedure distribution: The complaint-handling procedure must be thoroughly documented and distributed so that all involved personnel understand their responsibilities for ensuring product quality and reliability. 3. Measure of quality: The number of complaints and returns is helpful as one indicator of the success of a quality control program, but is not sure evidence of customer satisfaction. The degree of reliability changes with the customer type: a. Retail: Studies indicate that a very small portion of dissatisfied retail customers will register a complaint; approximately 96% of the unhappy customers do not complain to the company. Most simply do not repurchase and tell their friends, neighbors, and relatives about their dissatisfaction. b. Foodservice: A higher level of dissatisfied customers complain through their distributors; however, many of the complaints never reach the edible fats and oils processors. c. Food processor: Direct sales of large product quantities to food processors result in a higher level of product complaints being registered with the supplier. Also, food processor complaints can be investigated more thoroughly to better identify the corrective action required to prevent a recurrence through direct contact with the customer. 4. Results: An industrial customer probably understands that problems will occur; therefore, he or she will remember your company either for its inability to handle the problem or for its outstanding support during a time of crisis. The impression caused can definitely affect future sales. 5. Slow response: A speedy analysis is necessary when your product is reported as the problem and you are not in agreement. Every effort should be made to identify the real problem cause to protect your product and turn this negative into a positive. 6. Frustration: Passing the buck and voice mail are probably the two most frustrating experiences for a customer with a question or a complaint. This frustration should
Troubleshooting
655
be prevented by adopting a policy that the first person involved must handle all the customer’s inquires until the situation has a successful conclusion. When voice mail is utilized, a procedure to return calls within a short period must be enforced. 7. Points to consider: Personnel routinely handling complaints should have enough experience to answer questions regarding the product and should have the personality to fit the situation. The following are guidelines provided by persons routinely handling complaints at one company: a. Listen and be attentive to the customer. b. Keep your voice calm. c. Stay objective. d. Show a genuine willingness to help. e. Get all necessary information the first time. f. Stay with the customer; do not put him or her on hold or answer another call. g. Discuss a course of action with options. h. Commit to perform requested services on a specified date and meet that commitment. i. Make sure that the technical-service representative understands the sensitivity of a situation when making a difficult call. j. Acknowledge the complaint in writing. k. Make a sincere effort to resolve the complaint. l. Make sure the customer has the proper information for any necessary followup calls. m. Keep the company’s mission statement and principles of conduct in mind at all times. n. Remember, to the customer you are the company.
Problem: Product Traceability The key component for any recall procedure is the ability to trace the use of specific lots of raw materials, ingredients, or processing aids to the finished product and then to account for all quantities produced. Possible Causes and Corrective Actions
1. Package product code dates: The code date should be as simple as possible and include the date packaged, batch or time period, and plant location. All packages and shipping containers must be coded with the same information. The actual code dates must be clearly discernible and placed in the same location, which can be easily located for rapid identification. 2. Shipping records: Accurate product quantities by code date must be recorded on the shipping records for traceability. The two most common problems experienced are failing to record more than one code date per shipment and code dates being hidden on the case panels facing the inside of the pallet, causing these code dates to be omitted. 3. Processing records: Accurate batch and lot number recording for each component of a new process batch is mandatory for good traceability. Systems must be designed and implemented to preserve this information for the life of all the components.
656
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
4. Universal product codes (UPCs): UPCs are used for almost all retail products, and many companies use this system for all their products, regardless of the customer type. This system is also used by many large distribution systems for inventory control. 5. Sequential case coding: Additional sequential number case coding increases the degree of traceability to within a particular lot of product. This added feature allows the identification of product from any point during the packaging sequence. Suspected problems can be pinpointed by testing to determine the start or end of a particular difference or change in the product.
REFERENCES
1. Mostia, W.L., Control for the process industries, Control Mag., 9, 65–69, 1996. 2. Parker, W.A. and Melnick, D., Absence of aflatoxin from refined vegetable oils, JAOCS, 43, 635–638, 1996. 3. List, G.R., Special processing for off specification oil, in Handbook for Soy Oil Processing and Utilization, Erickson, D. et al., Eds., The American Soybean Association and AOCS, Champaign, IL, 1985, pp. 355–377. 4. Robertson, J.A. et al., Chemical evaluation of oil from field and storage-damaged soybeans, JAOCS, 50, 443–445, 1973. 5. Hendrix, W.B., Current practice in continuous cottonseed miscella refining, JAOCS, 61, 1369–1372, 1984. 6. Pritchard, J.R., Oilseed quality requirements for processing, JAOCS, 60, 324–325, 1983. 7. Buck, D.F., Antioxidants in soya oil, JAOCS, 58, 275–278, 1981. 8. King, R.R., Quality changes in the industrial storage of crude and refined cottonseed oil, Oil Soap, 18, 21, 1941. 9. Burkhalter, J.P., Crude oil handling and storage, JAOCS, 53, 332–333, 1976. 10. Lathrap, C.A., Determination of weight of bulk oil shipments, JAOCS, 42, 155–158, 1965. 11. Carlson, K.F. and Scott, J.D., Recent developments and trends in oilseed and fats and oils processing, INFORM, 2, 1034, 1991. 12. Dijkstra, A.J., Degumming, refining, washing and drying fats and oils, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed Technology and Utilization, Applewhite, T.H., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1992, p. 138. 13. Carr, R.A., Refining and degumming systems for edible fats and oils, JAOCS, 55, 770, 1978. 14. Braake, B., Degumming and refining practices in Europe, JAOCS, 53, 353, 1976. 15. De Panfilis, F., Toschi, T.G. and Lercker, G., Quality control for cold pressed oils, INFORM, 9, 212–221, 1998. 16. Cook, R., Thermally induced isomerism by deodorization, INFORM, 13, 71–76, 2001. 17. Puri, P.S., Hydrogenation of oils and fats, JAOCS, 57, 852A, 1980. 18. Erickson, M.D., Interesterification, in Practical Handbook of Soybean Processing and Utilization, Erickson, D.R., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL and United Soybean Board, St. Louis, MO, 1995, p. 291. 19. Hustedt, H.H., Interesterification of Edible Oils, JAOCS, 53, 390, 1976. 20. Rosendaal, A., Interesterification of fats and oils, in Edible Fats and Oils Processing: Basic Principals and Modern Practices: World Conference Proceedings, Erickson, D.R., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1990, p. 156.
Troubleshooting
657
21. Flider, F.J. and Orthoefer, F.T., Metals in soybean oil, JAOCS, 58, 181–182, 1981. 22. Morrison, W.H. et al., Solvent winterization of sunflower seed oil, JAOCS, 52, 148–150, 1975. 23. Botha, I, Mailer, R.J. and Robards, K., Evaluation of the role of saturated fatty acids in sedimenting canola oils, JAOCS, 77, 429–436, 2000. 24. Botha, I. and Mailer, R.J., Evaluation of cold-test methods for screening cloudy canola oils, JAOCS, 78, 295–400, 2001. 25. Sonntag, N.O.V., Fat splitting, esterification, and interesterification, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 2, 4th ed., Swern, D., Ed., Wiley–Interscience, New York, 1982, pp. 134–135. 26. Weiss, T.J., Food Oils and Their Uses, 2nd ed., AVI Publishing, Westport, CT, 1983, pp. 125, 131. 27. Gupta, M., Manufacturing processes for emulsifiers, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 4, 5th ed., Hui, Y.H., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996, pp. 588–589. 28. Harper, T., Chemical and physical refining, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed Processing and Utilization, R.F. Wilson, Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 2001, p. 21. 29. Young, F.V.K., Physical refining, in Edible Fats and Oils Processing: Basic Principal and Modern Practices: World Conference Proceedings, Erickson, D.R., Ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1990, p. 128. 30. Gavin, A.M., Deodorization and finished oil handling, JAOCS, 58, 181–182, 1981. 31. Dudrow, F.A., Deodorization of edible oils, JAOCS, 60, 274, 1981. 32. Weidermann, L.H., Degumming, refining and bleaching soybean oil, JAOCS, 58, 163– 165, 1981. 33. White, F.B., Deodorization, JAOCS, 33, 505, 1956. 34. Sherwin, E.R., Mistakes to avoid in applying antioxidants to vegetable oils, Food Eng., May, 83, 1977. 35. Sherwin, E.R., Antioxidants in vegetable oils, JAOCS, 53, 434–436, 1976. 36. Sherwin, E.R., Oxidation and antioxidants in fat and oil processing, JAOCS, 55, 809– 814, 1978. 37. Belbin, A.A., Color in oils, INFORM, 4, 652, 1993. 38. Crandall, L., The art and science of flavors, INFORM, 15, 347, 2004. 39. Sonntag, N.O.V., Reactions in the fatty acid chain, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 1, 4th ed., Swern, D., Ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1979, pp. 144–145. 40. Moser, H.A. et al., A light test to measure stability of edible oils, JAOCS, 42, 30–32, 1965. 41. Medina, I. et al., Oxidation of fish lipids during thermal stress as studied by 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, JAOCS, 75, 147, 1998. 42. Wanasundara, U.N., Stabilization of seal blubber and menhaden oils with green tea catechins, JAOCS, 73, 1183–1190, 1996. 43. Przybylski, R. and Eskin, N.A.M., Minor components and the stability of vegetable oils, INFORM, 17, 187–189, 2006. 44. Robbins, K. and Sewalt, V., Extending freshness with rosemary extract, INFORM, 16, 634–535, 2005. 45. Erickson, D.R. and List, G R., Storage, handling, and stabilization of edible fats and oils, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, T.H. Applewhite, Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1985, pp. 276–277.
658
Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications
46. Knightly, W.H., The use of emulsifiers in bakery foods, in Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Bakery Engineers, Chicago, March 3–5, 1969, p. 138. 47. Bennion, M.R. and Park, L., Changes in fats during frying, J. Am. Dietetic Assoc., 52, 308–312, 1968. 48. Banks, D., Industrial frying, in Deep Frying, Chemistry, Nutrition, and Practical Applications, Perkins, E.G. and Erickson, M.D., Eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1996, pp. 263–264. 49. Alexandersen, K., Margarine production, in Proceedings: World Conference on Emerging Technologies in the Fats and Oils Industry, Baldwin, A.R., Ed., American Oil Chemists Society, Champaign, IL, 1986, pp. 66–70. 50. Berger, K.G., The use of palm oil products in margarines, in PORIM Technology No 5, Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia, August, 1981, p. 3. 51. Chrysam, M.M., Margarine and spreads, in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 3, Y.H. Hui, Ed., John Wiley & Sons, 1996, pp. 99–100. 52. Przybylski, R. and Mag, T., Canola/rapeseed oil, in Vegetable Oils in Food Technology, Gunstone, F.D.,Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2002, pp. 117–118. 53. deMan, L. and deMan, J.M., Functionality of palm oil in margarines and shortenings, Lipid Technol., 6–10, 1994. 54. Wintermantel, J., Ingredients specification writing, part III, Cereal Foods World, 27, 372, 1982. 55. Manring, R.C., Statistics for better specs, JAOCS, 42, 668A–708A, 1965.
Index Bold locators indicate material in figures and tables.
A AACC, 198 Acetic acid anisidine value and, 220 for degumming, 85 for glyceride acetylation, 150 lecithin and, 100 for mayonnaise, 482–483 for miscella refining, 94 for salad dressing, 487–489 in vinegar, 485 Acetic fatty acid, 266, 267 Acetone in canola cold test, 39, 584 in enzymatic interesterification, 132 for filter cake oil extraction, 109 in fractionation, 143 gums and, 528 lecithin processing and, 100 in miscella refining, 94 Acetylated glycerides, 150, 216, 316, 324 Acid degumming bleaching and, 87 of canola oil, 37 color of gums, 570 description of, 85 expelling and, 77 lecithin processing and, 9, 85, 100, 570 for miscella refining, 94 modified process, 87 oilseed quality and, 571 purpose of, 83 Unilever process, 85–86 Acid heat break test, 528–529, 572, 576 Acidity, max free, 41 Acid oil, 98–99 Acid value, 220–221 Acrolein, 151 Activated bleaching earths, 103–104, 105, 145 Activated carbon, 104 Active oxygen method (AOM) stability AOCS on, 222 blending and, 306, 365, 580, 588 of canola oil, 38, 484 of coconut oil, 49, 386
of corn oil, 26, 484 of cottonseed oil, 21, 484, 555 description of, 222–223 FFA and, 651 fractionation and, 143 of high-oleic safflower oil, 36 of high-oleic sunflower oil, 32, 413 hydrogenation and, 279, 580 iodine value and, 279, 651 of lard, 53, 580 of milk fat, 59 nickel and, 580 of NuSun sunflower oil, 31 of olive oil, 42 OSI and, 223 of palm kernel oil, 51 of palm oil, 44 of peanut oil, 24 Rancimat and, 223 of safflower oil, 34, 35 of salad oil, 484–485, 484 Schaal oven test and, 224 of shortenings cookie fillers, 386 crackers, 395, 396 frying, 403, 413 household, 442 liquid, 375 liquid bread, 382 of soybean oil, 17, 386, 396, 484, 568 of sunflower oil, 29, 484 of tallow, 56 troubleshooting, 580 Adhesion filtration, 78 Aflatoxin, 23, 564 Agar, 458 Air over moisture analysis, 199 Albumin, 453 Alcoholysis, 146, 152, 585 ALCON treatment, 571 Aldehydes analysis of, 106, 212, 220 deodorization and, 153–154 flavor and, 454 formation of, 219 free radicals and, 166 659
660 Index
odor of, 219 oxidation and, 164, 220 silica and, 105 Algal oils, 64, 64–65, 337, 338 Algeria, 3 Alginates, 458 Alkali refining; See Chemical refining All-purpose shortening for baking, 171, 361–370, 362, 369, 375, 377 blending of, 545 cholesterol in, 366 color of, 545 crystal habit of, 365, 367, 370 emulsified, 362–363, 362, 368–370, 369, 375, 634 FFA in, 545 formulations for, 305–306, 365–368, 366 fractionation for, 367–368 for frying, 409–410 for home use; See Household shortenings interesterification for, 367 iodine value of, 365, 366, 370, 545 Mettler dropping point of, 545 oxidative stability of, 305 penetration test of, 364–365, 364 peroxide value of, 545 properties of, 368 saturated fatty acids in, 366, 545 SFI curves for, 364 SFI profile of, 171, 366, 545 smoke point of, 369 temperature and, 365 tempering of, 364, 364 trans fatty acids in, 366–367, 366, 545 Alpha-carotene, 43 Alpha-crystals in acetylated glycerides, 150 in fractionation, 539 in palm oil, 47 in PGMEs, 152 properties of, 286 in shortenings, 177 tempering and, 183 transformation rate, 141, 171, 285–286 in winterization, 135 Aluminum, 160 Aluminum sulfate, 142–143 Amaranth seed oil, 10 American Association of Cereal Chemists (AACC), 198 American Oil Chemists’ Society (AOCS) on acid value, 221 on anisidine values, 220 AOM for Fat Stability, 222
on bleaching, 229 on bulk shipment sampling, 546 on chlorophyll, 227 on cis fatty acids, 214 on cloud point, 177 cold test, 137, 140, 208, 326, 552 on color, 225–227 on congeal point, 207–208 on corn oil, 98 on cottonseed oil, 98 on fat in food, 214 on FFA, 221, 617 on flavor, 219 formation of, 198 on FT-NIR analysis, 214 impurity analysis method, 200 on iodine value, 212, 620 on melting points, 177, 202–203 on Mettler dropping point, 203, 534, 605 moisture analysis methods, 198–199 on monoglycerides, 216 OSI, 223 on penetrometer, 209 on peroxide value, 219 procedures developed by, 521–522 on refining efficiency, 97–98, 229 on refining loss, 229 on refractive index, 213 on setting point, 207–208 on SFC, 204, 205 on SFI, 204 on slipping point, 202–203 on smoke point, 221 soap analysis methods, 201 on softening point, 202 titer test, 207 on tocols, 217 on trans fatty acids, 214 on Wiley melting point, 203 American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 198, 209 Ammonia, 115, 173 Ammonia/sulfur dioxide test, 597 Ammonium sulfide, 535 Analytical product development, 327–328 Anchovies, 338 Anhydride, 85, 100, 150 Animal fats; See also specific types of antioxidants for, 167, 339 availability of, 4 characteristics of, 7–8, 265 Chinese green tea extract and, 282 cholesterol in, 9, 11 consumption of, 4–7, 6
Index
from cows; See Dairy products creaming gas for, 444 deodorization of, 155 in diet, 4 factors affecting, 8 incoming analysis of, 527 isolation of, 1 for margarine, 448, 451 proteins in, 55, 527, 529, 566, 592 rendering of, 52, 55, 79, 527, 566 saturated fatty acids in, 267 sterols in, 9, 10–12 storage of, 629 structure of, 7–8, 126, 265 tocols in, 9 turbidimeters and, 200 Anisidine values, 106, 212, 220 Annatto, 227, 450, 456 Antioxidants acid oil and, 99 analysis of, 216 antifoamers and, 633, 635 baking and, 368 chelating agents and, 167, 169, 283 chemical refining and, 10 color from, 168, 368, 636 in corn oil, 27 in cottonseed oil, 20 decomposition of, 599 definition of, 166 deodorization and, 10, 591, 596, 599 FDA on, 167, 216 FFA and, 591, 607 for fish oil, 63, 627 flavor and, 166–167, 216, 596 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of, 167, 281 fractionation and, 145, 279 free radicals and, 166–167, 216, 281, 599, 627 for frying; See under Frying shortening, antioxidants in for fungal oil, 65 for lard, 54, 167 for margarine, 455 Meat Inspection Act on, 167, 281 in olive oil, 43 oxidative stability and, 164, 166–167, 216, 281–283, 627 Poultry Inspection Act on, 167, 281 rancidity and, 166 for soybean oil, 18, 167 storage of, 599 synergistic mixtures of, 168–169, 283, 455 for tallow, 57
661
temperature and, 599 troubleshooting, 598–600 USDA on, 167, 216 Antipolymerization, 10 AOAC, 198, 214 AOM; See Active oxygen method Apocarotenal, 227, 456 Appearance assessment, 224, 227–228 Application product development, 325–326 Arachidic fatty acid in butter, 427 in canola oil, 38, 40, 354, 491 classification of, 7, 268 in coconut oil, 49, 427 in corn oil, 27 in cottonseed oil, 21, 138, 290, 427, 491 in high-oleic safflower oil, 36, 354, 491 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 33, 354, 491 interesterification and, 293, 294 in lard, 54 melting point and, 266 in menhaden oil, 62 in olive oil, 42 in palm kernel oil, 51, 427 in palm oil, 45 in peanut oil, 24, 268 positioning of, 7 in rapeseed oil, 354 in safflower oil, 34, 354 in soybean oil, 18, 138, 427, 491 in sunflower oil, 30, 354 in tallow, 57 Arachidonic fatty acid from algae, 64 in butter, 338 CLA and, 275 constants for, 214 in diet, 272 in fungal oil, 65, 66 in lard, 270 from linseed, 15 in menhaden oil, 62 methylene groups, 277 in milk fat, 339 omega designation, 266, 271 oxidation and, 277 sources of, 272 Arachis hypogaea; See Peanuts Argentina, 3 Aroma, 41, 60; See also Odor Ascorbic acid, 167 Ascorbyl palmitate, 65, 282, 338, 455; See also Lecithin Ascorbyl stearate, 455
662 Index
Association of Official Analytical Chemists’ (AOAC), 198, 214 ASTM, 198, 209 Atmospheric bleaching applications for, 103 batch, 101 colors in, 102 contact time for, 577, 582 flow chart for, 102 material for, 103 temperature for, 106 vs. vacuum bleaching, 102, 106, 145, 595 Australia, 3, 15, 22 Austria, 3 Automatic tintometers, 226
B Bacteria benzoic acid and, 455 cooking and, 76 dairy analogs and, 425, 433 description of, 644 in margarine, 558, 644–645 omega fatty acids from, 76 sour cream from, 433 trans fatty acids from, 274 Baked fruit pies, 419–420 Baker’s margarine/shortening all-purpose, 171, 361–368, 366, 369 blends for, 335 color additives for, 454–455 crystallization in, 182, 470 description of, 466 emulsifiers for, 350, 368–370, 369 hardfat for, 464 Mettler dropping point of, 391, 466 plasticity of, 306 salt in, 455 SFI profile of, 391, 466 Bakery frying shortenings, 416–420 Baking, definition of, 361 Baking powder, 640 Bangladesh, 3 Barley oil, 10 Basestocks advantages of, 119–120, 301 blending of, 119–121, 133, 152–153, 302, 328, 580, 589 choice of, 301–302 control evaluations for, 534
cottonseed oil in, 302, 303, 306 evaluation of, 119 fractionated, 302 hardfat; See Hardfats/stocks hydrogenation for, 120–121, 122, 303, 534 interesterified, 302, 367 lard in, 55 oxidative stability of, 306 palm oil and, 45–46, 302 plasticity and, 306–308, 307 precious metal catalysts for, 115 in process flow chart, 75 safflower oil in, 35 SFI and, 121, 302, 306–308, 307, 327–328 soybean oil in; See under Soybean oil, in basestocks tallow and, 302 winterization of, 120 Batch refining, 74, 79, 95–96 Beaded fats, 187–188, 359 Beaded shortening, 355 Behenic fatty acid in butter, 427 in canola oil, 38, 40, 354, 491 classification of, 7, 268 in coconut oil, 427 in corn oil, 27 in cottonseed oil, 21, 290, 427, 491 erucic fatty acid and, 270 in high-oleic safflower oil, 36, 354, 491 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 33, 354, 491 in lard, 54 melting point and, 266 in olive oil, 42 in palm kernel oil, 427 in peanut oil, 24, 268 positioning of, 7 in rapeseed oil, 354 in safflower oil, 34, 354 in soybean oil, 18, 427, 491 in sunflower oil, 30, 354 Belgium, 3 Bentonite clays, 103–104, 105 Benzoic acid, 455 Beta-carotene apocarotenal and, 456 free radicals and, 12 in margarine, 455 in palm oil, 44 in peanut oil, 23 radiation and, 12 in shortening, 551, 617–618 vitamins and, 12
Index
Beta-crystals aeration and, 357 in canola oil, 39 consistency and, 631 description of, 139, 286–287 flavor and, 648 in fractionation, 539 interchangeability and, 334 interesterification and, 292, 294 in lard, 45, 54–55, 124 long-chain fatty acids and, 291 in margarines, 310, 469 properties of, 286 set up time for, 417 SFI curve and, 305 in shortenings, 177, 312, 387, 388, 389, 411 sorbitan esters and, 324 in soybean oil, 18, 310 structure and, 215 tempering and, 182–183 transformation rate, 141, 171, 285–286 in winterization, 135 Beta-prime-crystals aeration and, 357 consistency and, 55, 288, 631 in cottonseed oil, 21, 45–47, 306 description of, 139, 286–287 diglycerides and, 132 in fractionation, 539 interchangeability and, 334 interesterification and, 292, 294, 442 in lard, 45, 55, 124 in margarines, 183, 310, 312, 458, 469 in milk fat, 60 palmitic fatty acid and, 20 in palm oil, 45–47 plasticization and, 306 properties of, 20, 55, 286 set up time for, 417 in shortenings cookie, 384 crème fillings, 377–378 Danish pastry, 391 icing, 377–378 liquid, 177 pie crusts, 387 plasticity and, 306 puff paste, 393 tempering and, 183 in soybean oil, 18 structure and, 215, 287 in tallow, 57 tempering and, 183 transformation rate, 141, 171, 285–286
663
in winterization, 135 BHA; See Butylated hydroxyanisole BHT; See Butylated hydroxytoluene Biscuits, 223–224, 387–389 Bismuth, 115 Bleaching acid degumming and, 87 aflatoxin and, 23 agents for, 103–105, 145 analysis of, 229 atmospheric; See Atmospheric bleaching batch, 101–102, 102 calcium and, 13 of canola oil, 39, 104, 530–531 carotene and, 12, 43, 567 carotenoids and, 105, 107, 144 chelating agents and, 145 in chemical refining, 91, 96–97 chlorophyll and; See under Chlorophyll, bleaching and of coconut oil, 103 color and; See under Color, bleaching and control points for, 530–532, 542–543 of corn oil, 530–531, 579 of cottonseed oil, 229, 348, 567 degumming and, 86, 87 deodorization and, 105, 158 dewaxing and, 139, 140 FFA and, 103, 104, 106–107, 530, 543 filtration and, 108–109, 575–576, 581 flavor and, 153, 595 fractionation and, 144–145, 539 hydrogenation and, 101, 105, 144, 542, 580–582 interesterification and, 144–145, 542 isomerization and, 103, 104, 106–107 of lard, 55, 103, 531–532 of lecithin, 100 of menhaden oil, 61 after modification; See Postbleaching odor from, 153 oxidation and, 16, 102, 110, 144, 530, 592 oxidative stability and, 101–107 of palm kernel oil, 50 of palm oil, 43, 79, 81, 104 parameters for, 101–109 of peanut oil, 23 peroxide and, 104, 105, 144, 530, 580, 582, 595 pesticides and, 13 of PGEs, 151 phosphatides and, 8, 104, 530, 591 phosphorus and, 83, 105, 529, 530, 576 in physical refining, 81–83, 82
664 Index
on process flow chart, 75 proteins and, 592 purpose of, 100–101, 144, 595 before refining; See Prebleaching silica and, 87, 96–97, 105–107 soap and, 103–105, 107, 530, 537, 575–576, 591 sodium and, 13 of soybean oil, 16, 18, 104–105, 229, 530, 531, 543 of stearin, 145 storage and, 629 of sunflower oil, 229 of tallow, 55–56, 103, 531–532 TBHQ and, 567 temperatures for, 106–107 time for, 107 tocols in, 102 trace metals and, 13, 83, 104, 144, 530, 542, 629 unsaturated fatty acids and, 103, 106–107 vacuum; See Vacuum bleaching water washing and, 91 waxes and, 530 winterization and, 133, 136 Bleaching earths acid treatment of, 103 activated, 103–104, 105, 145 bulk density of, 104 canola oil and, 39, 104 carbon and, 104 carotenoids and, 12 chlorophyll and, 39, 56 citric acid removal by, 126 control of, 531 in degumming, 86 disposal of, 109 dosage of, 105–106 efficiency of, 105–107 flavor and, 595 free radicals and, 629 after interesterification, 126, 538 moisture level in, 104, 107 natural, 103, 105 odor of, 109, 110 oil retention by, 103, 104, 126 oxidation and, 629 particle size in, 103–104 phosphoric acid removal by, 126 for postbleaching, 538, 581–582 for prebleaching, 576–577 proteins and, 55, 529 reuse of, 104 silica and, 87, 96–97, 105–107
temperature and, 106, 577 trans fatty acids and, 578 water washing and, 91 Blending of algal oils, 64 of all-purpose shortening, 545 AOM and, 306, 365, 580, 588 of basestocks, 119–121, 133, 152–153, 302, 328, 580, 589 of butter, 60 in chemical refining, 88, 90 cholesterol level and, 145 cold test and, 583 for consistency, 152–153, 548 control of, 544 of cottonseed oil, 18, 294, 329, 330, 331, 427, 631 deodorization and, 152, 596 description of, 152–153 of emulsifiers, 321 fatty acid composition and, 327, 588–589 in fractionation, 144 hydrogenation and, 118 vs. interesterification, 336 iodine value and, 327 labeling and, 351, 588–589 of lard, 55 of liquid oils, 479, 480 of margarine, 327–328, 327, 329, 451 of menhaden oil, 63 of milk fat, 60 in miscella refining, 94 of olive oil, 41 oxidative stability and, 365, 588 in process flow chart, 75 purpose of, 532 random interesterification and, 441–442 samples from, 589 SFI and, 327–328, 327, 329, 589 of shortening, 327–328, 327, 329 of soybean oil, 15, 329, 330, 331, 427 for structure, 304 of tallow, 57 trans fatty acids and, 335 in triglyceride replication method, 328 troubleshooting, 588–589 Boiler water treatments, 596 Bolivia, 3 Bollworms, 22 Bos taurus; See Cattle Brass, 16, 256, 401, 636, 642 Brassica campestris, 37 Brassica napus, 37 Brazil, 3, 22–23
Index
Bread continuous production of, 380–381 emulsifiers for antistaling, 177, 312, 318 conditioning, 150, 318, 319, 380, 382–383 consistency, 379–383 FDA on, 380 iodine value of, 315 shelf-life extension, 146, 314 texture, 312 flour for, 28 omega-3 fortification for, 338–339 shortening for, 312, 348, 356, 363, 379–383, 382 standard of identity for, 380 Brevoortia; See Menhaden fish Bromine, 115 Brush-hydrogenated basestocks discussion of, 120 for milk analogs, 434 for shortenings, 393 soybean oil in, 120, 122, 302, 303, 443 trans fatty acids, GMOs, and, 337 Budworms, 22 Buffers, 87, 131, 426 Bulk shipments; See Shipment Butter arachidic fatty acid in, 427 arachidonic fatty acid in, 338 behenic fatty acid in, 427 blending of, 60 butyric fatty acid in, 427 capric fatty acid in, 427 caproic fatty acid in, 267, 427 caprylic fatty acid in, 267, 427 clarifying of, 414 consistency of, 209 consumption of, 6, 7, 452, 452 definition of, 58 in diet, 4, 474 fat content of, 58 flavor of, 60, 153, 267, 280, 454 fractionation of, 464 for frying, 414 gadoleic fatty acid in, 427 hydrogenation and, 105 industrial, 466 interesterification of, 126 iodine value of, 427 lauric fatty acid in, 427 linoleic fatty acid in, 427 linolenic fatty acid in, 427 margaric fatty acid in, 427 melting point of, 126
665
Mettler dropping point of, 427, 466 milk fat in, 58 myristic fatty acid in, 427 myristoleic fatty acid in, 427 oleic fatty acid in, 427 palmitic fatty acid in, 427 palmitoleic fatty acid in, 427 pentadelandic fatty acid in, 427 SFI profile of, 391, 427, 466 in shortenings, 347 source of, 2 stearic fatty acid in, 269, 427 trans fatty acids in, 274, 427 Buttercream icings, 376, 466 Butterfat, 58, 60, 435, 435, 450 Butter oil, 58 Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) analysis of, 216 antioxidant activity of, 167–168, 281–283 applications for, 627 Chinese green tea extract and, 627 lard and, 54 for margarine, 455 marine oils and, 627 odor of, 168, 281–282, 643 potassium and, 168, 282, 629 rosemary and, 627 for shortenings, 281–282, 403–404, 421, 443 sodium and, 168, 282, 629 tallow and, 57 temperature and, 167 Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) analysis of, 216 antioxidant activity of, 168, 282–283 applications for, 627 Chinese green tea extract and, 627 iron and, 168, 282 lard and, 54 for margarine, 455 marine oils and, 627 rosemary and, 627 for shortenings, 403–404, 421, 443 tallow and, 57 temperature and, 168 Butyric fatty acid, 58, 59, 220, 266, 267, 427, 454–455 in palm kernel oil, 427 in soybean oil, 427
C Cake mix, 233, 251–252, 370–374, 418
666 Index
Cakes appearance scoring, 231 consistency of, 150 creaming volume test for, 230–231 dimethylpolysiloxane and, 368 donuts, 417–419 emulsifiers for, 150, 152, 315, 316–318, 322–323, 632 filling sandwich test for, 250 flour for, 28 icing volume test, 231–232, 244 lecithin for, 319, 632 methyl silicone and, 632 pound cake test, 231, 243 shortenings for all-purpose, 375 bakery frying, 416–420 deodorization of, 547 dimethylpolysiloxane in, 368, 403 emulsified all-purpose, 363, 368–370, 369, 375 emulsifiers for, 146, 374, 547, 548 lard, 348 liquid, 363, 374–376, 375 quality standards for, 547, 548, 551 shipment of, 548 specialty, 373–374 troubleshooting, 632 white layer tests for, 232, 245–248 Calcium, 13, 85, 88, 91, 527, 574 Calcium carbonate, 489 Calcium hydroxide, 147, 148, 149, 585 Calcium stearoyl-2-lactylates, 318, 380 California bay laurel tree, 14 Calories in acidulated soapstock, 99 from canola oil, 480 from corn, 99 from corn oil, 480 from cottonseed oil, 480 creaming gas and, 172, 444 daily value of, 298 data on food labels, 297–298 Dietary Guidelines for Americans on, 267, 273, 300, 441, 459 in diet margarine, 450 from essential fatty acids, 300 from fats and oils, 273, 298, 300, 459 FDA on, 298 in hardfat specific heat, 186 health claims on, 299–300 from medium-chain fatty acids, 267 from milk analogs, 435 from monounsaturates, 269
from omega fatty acids, 300, 337, 441 from polyunsaturated fatty acids, 273 from saturated fatty acids, 267, 299–300, 459 from shortening, 442 USDA on, 298 Campestanol, 12 Campesterol, 11 Canada, 3, 37, 451 Canadian Oil Processors Association, 526 Candida antarctica, 131 Canola oil AOCS evaluation method for, 97 AOM stability of, 38, 484 arachidic fatty acid in, 38, 40, 354, 491 in basestocks, 120 Baumé concentration for, 90 behenic fatty acid in, 38, 40, 354, 491 bleaching of, 39, 104, 530–531 calories from, 480 characteristics of, 37–39 chemical refining of, 90, 96 Chinese green tea extract and, 282 chlorophyll in, 38 bleaching and, 13, 39, 105, 530 causes of, 565, 572 chemical refining and, 577 discussion of, 39 Lovibond Color Method, 565 cholesterol and, 9, 478–479, 480 cloud point of, 37 cold test of, 37, 39, 484, 584 color of, 13, 39, 484, 565 consistency of, 39 consumption of, 5, 6 for cooking oil, 38, 477–480, 477 crystal habit of, 38, 39, 215, 286, 287 crystallization of, 39 degumming of, 37, 87 deodorization of, 156, 274 dewaxing of, 479 discussion of, 37–40 eicosadienoic fatty acid in, 40 erucic fatty acid in, 38, 40, 270, 354 FFA in, 484 flavor of, 280, 484, 625 fractionation of, 39 gadoleic fatty acid in, 38, 40, 354, 491 genetically modified, 39–40, 40, 355 glucosinolates in, 37 GRAS status of, 478 hardening of, 290–291 high-stability, 491 hydrogenation of, 39, 308 hydrolysis, 37
Index
interesterification of, 292, 294, 442 iodine value of, 37, 40, 278, 484, 491 iron in, 87 lauric fatty acid in, 14, 40, 491 lignoceric fatty acid in, 38, 40, 354 linoleic fatty acid in, 38, 39, 40, 338, 354, 491 linolenic fatty acid in, 38, 354 discussion of, 38–39 genetically modified, 40 high-oleic, 491 to linoleic ratio, 338, 479 vs. rapeseed, 354 margaric fatty acid in, 491 for margarine, 647 marketing of, 7 for mayonnaise, 483 melting point of, 37 menhaden oil and, 62 monounsaturated fatty acids in, 38, 480, 484 myristic fatty acid in, 38, 40, 354, 491 nervonic fatty acid in, 40 nutritional labeling on, 480 odor of, 625 oleic fatty acid in, 38, 354 cholesterol and, 478–479 discussion of, 38 genetically modified, 40, 270, 491 vs. rapeseed, 354 omega fatty acids in discussion of, 37–38, 337 ratio of, 62–63, 338, 479 salad oil, 480, 484 oxidation of, 39 oxidative stability of, 38, 278, 491 palmitic fatty acid in, 38, 40, 215, 354, 491 palmitoleic fatty acid in, 38, 40, 354, 491 peroxide value of, 484 phosphatides in, 8–9, 9, 88 phosphoric acid and, 39, 88 phosphorus in, 87, 530 polyunsaturated fatty acids in, 480 production of, 4 refining of, 80, 82, 89, 96, 97 refractive index of, 37 for salad oil, 474, 477–480, 477, 482 saponification number of, 37 saturated fatty acids in, 38, 478, 480, 484 for shortenings, 367, 387, 442 soybean oil and, 294 specific gravity of, 37 steaming of, 82 stearic fatty acid in, 38, 40, 354, 491 sterols in, 9 structure of, 39
667
sulfur in, 38, 39, 530–531 titer test of, 37 tocols in, 9, 38 trans fatty acids in, 274, 308–310, 480, 484 triglyceride composition of, 38, 39 unsaponifiable matter in, 9, 37 unsaturated fatty acids in, 478 wax in, 38, 39, 140, 474, 540, 584 winterization of, 39, 584 yield, 3, 4 Canola seeds, 3, 4, 37, 39–40, 74–78, 565 Capric fatty acid in algal oil, 64 in butter, 427 classification of, 267 in coconut oil, 49, 427 in cottonseed oil, 427 interesterification and, 293, 294 in lard, 53 in milk fat, 58, 59, 427 in palm kernel oil, 51, 427 in palm oil, 293 rancidity and, 220 in soybean oil, 427 Caproic fatty acid in butter, 267, 427 classification of, 267 in coconut oil, 49, 267, 427 in cottonseed oil, 427 flavor and, 52 interesterification and, 293 melting point and, 266 in milk fat, 58, 59, 427 in palm kernel oil, 51, 267, 427 in palm oil, 293 rancidity and, 220 in soybean oil, 427 Caprylic fatty acid in butter, 267, 427 classification of, 267 in coconut oil, 49, 267, 427 in cottonseed oil, 427 flavor and, 52 interesterification and, 293 melting point and, 266 in milk fat, 58, 59, 427 in palm kernel oil, 51, 267, 427 in palm oil, 293 in soybean oil, 427 Capsicum, 282 Carbohydrates classification of, 8 color from, 12 for dairy analogs, 426
668 Index
as energy source, 1 in frying, 405 phosphoric acid and, 591, 592 in starch, 324 Carbon, 104, 163, 348 Carbon dioxide deodorization and, 591 FFA and, 591, 607, 632 hydrogenation catalyst and, 534, 578 interesterification and, 129, 580 nitrogen and, 591, 607 polyunsaturated fatty acids and, 338 for salad dressing processing, 487, 489 saponification and, 131 in yeast-raised dough, 338 Carbon disulfide, 534, 578 Carbon monoxide, 115, 578 Carlson, Anton, 449 Carotene bleaching and, 12, 43, 567 classification of, 8 color from, 12, 43, 227 decomposition of, 567 for margarine, 449–450 in milk fat, 58 in olive oil, 43 oxidation and, 43, 567 in palm kernel oil, 565 in palm oil, 12, 43–48, 44 pressing temperature and, 77 TBHQ and, 567 types of; See Alpha-carotene; Beta-carotene vitamins and, 12 Carotenoids bleaching and, 105, 107, 144 color from, 224 deodorization and, 154, 155, 544, 592 EDTA and, 455 hydrogenation and, 542, 544 in margarine, 456 in olive oil, 41 oxidation and, 12, 41, 164, 628 oxidative stability and, 41 in palm oil, 45, 48 silica and, 105 steaming and, 81 Carrageenans, 458 Carrot oil, 456 Carthamine, 33 Carthamus tinctorius; See Safflowers Casein, 425, 434, 453, 458 Caseinate, 430, 434, 452, 458 Cattle, 100, 448; See also Tallow Caustic refining; See Chemical refining
CBEs, 124, 143, 305, 311 CBRs, 143 Cellulose, 108 Cephalins, 9 Cereal oils, 10 Ceryl alcohol, 27 CFR; See Code of federal regulations Chalcones, 627 Cheese analogs, 425, 431–432 Chelation antioxidant activity and, 167, 169, 283 deodorization and, 160–161 of lard, 54 phosphatides and, 9 of soybean oil, 18 of tallow, 57 trace metals and, 13, 88, 596, 627 Chemical interesterification, 291 Chemical refining acid heat break test for, 528–529, 572, 576 aflatoxin and, 23 antioxidants and, 10 batch, 95–96 blending in, 88, 90 breakover in, 573 of canola oil, 90, 96 caustic–oil mixing in, 90 caustic treatment in, 89–90, 90 of coconut oil, 90, 96 color and, 88–90, 92, 571–574 of corn oil, 90 of cottonseed oil; See under Cottonseed oil, chemical refining of crude oil conditioning for, 88–89 degumming before, 83, 528, 574 deodorization and, 155, 158–159 description of, 88–97 dewaxing and, 140 expelling and, 77 FFA and, 80, 88–90, 92, 96, 154, 529, 571–573 flavor and, 89 flow chart for, 93 formulas for, 89 for gossypol removal, 13, 20, 80, 83, 89 gums and, 83, 88 of lauric oils, 96, 571 miscella, 78, 87, 92–94, 565 oleic fatty acid and, 89, 571 of olive oil, 96 over-refining, 574 oxidative stability and, 574 of palm kernel oil, 90 of palm oil, 43–44, 89–90, 90, 92, 96, 571
Index
of peanut oil, 23, 90, 96 phosphatides and, 8, 80, 88, 90–91, 94 phosphoric acid in, 88–89, 92 pigments and, 88 process control points, 528–529 on process flow chart, 75 of safflower oil, 90, 96 sampling for, 88 short-mix method of, 92, 93 silica in, 96–97 soap and, 88, 90–100, 572–574 sodium hydroxide in; See under Sodium hydroxide, in chemical refining of soybean oil, 90, 96, 529 sterols and, 10–12 storage preparation in, 92 of sunflower oil, 29, 90, 96 of tallow, 56 tocols and, 10 troubleshooting, 571–574 ultrashort-mix method of, 92 vacuum drying in, 91 water washing in, 91 Chicken fat, 282, 400 Chickens, 22, 100 Chile, 3 Chili powder extract, 282 Chill roll development of, 349 disadvantages of, 394 for fat flakes, 185–187, 186, 554–555, 614–618, 620 for icing stabilizers, 379 material for, 618 for plasticizing, 173, 174 for powdered fats, 188 for shortenings chips, 395 speed of, 614 Chill test, 140, 208, 541, 542 China, 3, 475 Chinese green tea extract, 282, 627 Chlorophyll analysis of, 227 AOCS on, 227 bleaching and AOCS on, 227 in canola oil, 13, 39, 105, 530 in chemical refining, 89 green color from, 13, 144, 577 materials for, 105, 144 silica and, 105, 107 in soybean oil, 13, 105, 530, 531, 564 in tallow, 56, 532, 566
669
in canola oil; See under Canola oil, chlorophyll in classification of, 8 color from; See under Color, from chlorophyll decomposition of, 13 deodorization and, 39 filtration for, 88 hydrogenation and, 39, 542 light exposure and, 144 in olive oil, 13, 41, 42, 43 oxidation and, 41, 144, 189, 227, 628 oxidative stability and, 13, 628 phosphoric acid and, 39, 89 in soybean oil; See under Soybean oil, chlorophyll in in tallow, 13, 56, 527, 566 unsaturated fatty acids and, 13, 144 Chocolate, 319, 324 Cholesterol in animal fats, 9, 11 blending and, 145 in butterfat, 435 canola oil and, 9, 478–479, 480 in coconut oil, 9, 386, 435 in corn oil, 9, 480 in cottonseed oil, 9, 480 data on food labels, 299 description of, 11 in diet, 7, 11, 438 Dietary Guidelines for Americans on, 300, 459 in eggs, 485 FDA on, 11, 456 in fish oil, 11, 62 health claims on, 299–300 hydrogenation and, 532 in lard, 9, 366, 388 lauric fatty acid and, 11, 268 lipoproteins and, 11 MCTs and, 11 medium-chain fatty acids and, 11, 267, 268 in menhaden oil, 62 monounsaturated fatty acids and, 11, 269, 479 myristic fatty acid and, 11, 55, 268 oleic fatty acid and, 23, 38, 270 olive oil and, 9, 478 palmitic fatty acid and, 11, 268 in palm kernel oil, 9 in palm oil, 9 peanut oil and, 9, 23, 25 polyunsaturated fatty acids and, 11, 450, 479 saturated fatty acids and, 11, 267–268, 274, 532 in shortenings, 366, 386, 388, 435
670 Index
in soybean oil, 9, 388, 435, 480 squalene and, 10, 43 stanols and, 11, 12 steaming and, 145 stearic fatty acid and, 18, 268 stripping process, 145, 366 in sunflower oil, 9, 480 in tallow, 9, 55, 145, 366 trans fatty acids and, 11, 145, 274, 439, 450, 532 unsaturated fatty acids and, 11, 269 Chromium, 160, 404 Churn, 178 Cis fatty acids AOCS on, 214 in CLA, 274–275 conversion to trans, 367 data on food labels, 299 in frying, 406 FT-NIR analysis for, 212 hydrogenation and, 111, 278, 459 isomerization and, 273 melting points of, 111, 266, 274 in milk fat, 58 oxidation and, 276–277 oxidative stability and, 274 positioning of, 269, 271, 274 in tallow, 55 Citric acid antioxidant activity and, 167, 169, 283 in bleaching, 126, 145 decomposition of, 161, 596 in degumming, 83, 85, 87 deodorization and, 161, 591–593, 596 emulsification with, 316 FFA and, 543, 591, 607 flaking and, 617, 620 flavor and, 596 frying shortening and, 404, 421, 638 after hydrogenation, 581 after interesterification, 125, 129, 144, 538, 581 lard and, 54 linoleic fatty acid and, 282 for mayonnaise, 482 packaging and, 604 peroxide value and, 593 phosphatides and, 9 for salad dressing, 487, 489 soybean oil and, 16, 352, 565 tallow and, 57 temperature and, 596 tocopherol and, 167 trace metals and, 13, 596, 627
in water washing, 91 CLA, 55, 58, 274–275 Cloud point AOCS on, 177 of canola oil, 37 consistency and, 208 of corn oil, 26 of cottonseed oil, 21 crystal habit and, 177 definition of, 47 fractionation and, 296, 297 of olive oil, 42 of palm kernel oil, 297 of palm oil, 46, 47, 297 of peanut oil, 24 SFI and, 208 of soybean oil, 17, 296, 297 of sunflower oil, 29 of tallow, 297 test for, 208 Clupanodonic fatty acid, 62, 63, 65, 214, 266, 271 Clupeids, 61 Coal tar dyes, 449 Cocoa butter crystal habit of, 215, 287 hard butter and, 310 lecithin and, 319 melting range of, 126, 333 oleic fatty acid in, 215, 328, 333 palmitic fatty acid in, 215, 333 palm oil and, 333 softening point of, 333 stearic fatty acid in, 269, 333 structure of, 215, 311, 328–333 Cocoa butter equivalents (CBEs), 124, 143, 305, 311 Cocoa butter replacers (CBRs), 143 Cocoa butter substitute (CBS), 48, 124, 311 Cocoa powder, 100, 320 Coconut oil AOM stability of, 49, 386 applications for, 52 arachidic fatty acid in, 49, 427 Baumé concentration for, 89, 90, 528 behenic fatty acid in, 427 bleaching of, 103 butyric fatty acid in, 427 capric fatty acid in, 49, 427 caproic fatty acid in, 49, 267, 427 caprylic fatty acid in, 49, 267, 427 CBRs from, 143 in Ceylon pipes, 142 chemical refining of, 90, 96
Index
cholesterol in, 9, 386, 435 in cocoa butter substitutes, 311 color of, 50 consumption of, 5, 6 crystal habit of, 49, 287 for dairy analogs, 427 degumming of, 86 deodorization of, 155 discussion of, 48–50 FFA in, 90, 283 flavor of, 50, 280 fractionation of, 142 for frying, 353, 415, 415, 641, 644 gadoleic fatty acid in, 49, 427 in hard butters, 124 hydrolysis, 50, 280 interesterification of, 126, 292, 293, 294, 462 iodine value of, 49, 278, 427 lauric fatty acid in, 48, 52, 221, 267–268, 427 linoleic fatty acid in, 49, 427 linolenic fatty acid in, 427 liquid oils and, 626–627 margaric fatty acid in, 427 for margarine, 448–449, 464–465 medium-chain fatty acids in, 267–268 melting point of, 48, 126, 127, 267–268 Mettler dropping point of, 49, 386, 427 for milk analogs, 434 monounsaturated fatty acids in, 435 myristic fatty acid in, 49, 268, 427 myristoleic fatty acid in, 427 for nondairy creamers, 428, 429 for nut oil roasting, 422 odor of, 50 oleic fatty acid in, 49, 427 oxidation of, 50, 641 oxidative stability of, 49, 278 palmitic fatty acid in, 49, 427 palmitoleic fatty acid in, 427 palm kernel oil and, 50–52 palm oil and, 293 pentadelandic fatty acid in, 427 phosphatides in, 9 plasticity of, 353 polyunsaturated fatty acids in, 435 production of, 4 refining of, 80, 89–90, 96 refractive index of, 49 saponification number of, 49, 89 saturated fatty acids in, 50, 386, 435 SFI profile of, 49, 268, 386, 427 for shortenings advantages/disadvantages of, 353 chips, 359
671
cookie fillers, 353, 385, 386 cookies, 385 U.S. usage, 352 solidification point, 49 source of; See Coconuts for sour cream analogs, 434 soybean oil and, 294 specific gravity of, 49 stearic fatty acid in, 49, 427 sterols in, 9 titer test of, 49 tocols in, 9, 49 trans fatty acids in, 386, 427, 435 triglyceride composition of, 49 unsaponifiable matter in, 9, 49 unsaturated fatty acids in, 50 yield, 3 Coconut palms, 2, 48 Coconuts maturation of, 2, 48 meat of; See Copra producing areas, 3 Cocos nucifera; See Coconut palms Code dates, 514–515, 655–656 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) definition of, 298 on dimethylpolysiloxane, 402 on emulsifiers, 314 on food labels, 298–300 on French dressing, 489 on low-fat margarine, 458 on marine oil, 60 standards from, 501 Cod liver oil, 624 Cold test AOCS on, 137, 140, 208, 326, 552 blending and, 583 of canola oil, 37, 39, 484, 584 of corn oil, 26, 484, 542 of cottonseed oil; See under Cottonseed oil, cold test of crystallization and, 137, 208, 326 definition of, 137 description of, 208 for dewaxing, 140, 208, 541 failure of, 582–583 of high-oleic safflower oil, 36 of high-oleic sunflower oil, 32 for mayonnaise, 208, 326 of menhaden oil, 62, 63 of NuSun sunflower oil, 31 of olive oil, 42 of palm oil, 44 of peanut oil, 24
672 Index
of safflower oil, 34 for salad oil, 137, 208, 473, 474, 484, 485, 552 solvent winterization and, 136 of soybean oil, 17, 137, 138, 474, 484, 531 of sunflower oil, 29, 484 for winterization, 133, 137–138, 540 Coliforms, 558, 644 Color; See also Pigments in anisidine test, 220 from antioxidants, 168, 368, 636 AOCS on, 225–227 assessment of, 224 automatic tintometers, 226 bleaching and chemical refining, 571–572, 574 chlorophyll and, 13, 144, 577 clay and, 97 after deodorization, 144–145 discussion of, 101–110 extraction, 564–566 rendering, 566 silica and, 97 of soybean oil, 531, 543 troubleshooting, 576–577, 581–582 of canola oil, 13, 39, 484, 565 from carbohydrates, 12 from carotene, 12, 43, 227 chemical refining and, 88–90, 92, 571–574 from chlorophyll bleaching and, 13, 144, 577 chemical refining and, 572 discussion of, 12, 224 of soybean oil; See under Soybean oil, chlorophyll in clay and, 39, 97 of coconut oil, 50 in cold- vs. warm-pressed oil, 77 of corn oil, 26, 484, 542 of cottonseed oil; See under Cottonseed oil, color of “cup loss,” 228 cyclopropenoid fatty acids and, 22 deodorization and, 591–593 of emulsifiers, 585–586 FAC method, 226 of fat flakes, 556, 617–620 of fried foods, 399 Gardner color scale, 227 from gossypol, 12, 13, 89 hydrogenation and, 535, 536, 542–543 in interesterification, 125, 126, 129, 537 of lard, 12, 348, 566 of lecithin, 100, 227 Lovibond; See Lovibond Color Method
of margarine, 459, 646 miscella refining and, 94 in moisture analysis, 199 of olive oil, 13, 41 oxidation and, 102, 106, 592, 607–609 of palm kernel oil, 50, 565–566 of palm oil, 43 of peanut oil, 23 peroxide value and, 606 phosphatides and, 591–592 phosphoric acid and, 89 in polymerization, 151 from propyl gallate, 167 from protein, 12 raw material analysis of, 526 of rendered fats, 527 of salad oil, 484, 484 of shortening flakes, 617–620 of shortenings all-purpose, 545 cake, 547, 548, 551 frying, 407, 413 household, 439 icing, 547, 548 liquid, 553, 613 troubleshooting, 607–609, 629–630 soap and, 591–592 of soybean oil bleaching, 531, 543 chemical refining, 529 chlorophyll; See under Soybean oil, chlorophyll in deodorization, 17 flakes, 556a frost damage, 564 heat, 17 hydrogenation, 536 salad oil, 484 spectrophotometry, 226, 227 of sterols, 10 in storage, 567 of sunflower oil, 29, 484 of tallow, 13, 56, 226, 527, 530, 566 of tocols, 10, 572 trace metals and, 160 Wesson method for, 225–226 in Wijs iodine test, 212 Color reversion, 155 Columbia, 3 Column chromatography, 217 Commingling definition of, 169 FFA and, 638 flavor and, 626–627
Index
foaming and, 633 in handling/storage, 169, 568 iodine value and, 621 in shipment, 190 viscosity and, 612 Commonwealth of Independent States, 3 Complaint handling procedure, 510–511, 654–655 Confectioners’ fats, 185, 186, 304, 305, 310, 311 Conformance, quality of, 518–520 Congeal point, 207–208 Conjugated linoleic fatty acid (CLA), 55, 58, 274–275 Consistency analysis of, 201, 208–210 blending for, 152–153, 548 of butter, 209 of cakes, 150 of canola oil, 39 cloud point and, 208 of cottonseed oil, 20 crystal habit and, 55, 288, 631, 646 crystallization and, 209 of emulsifiers, 147, 150 evaluation of, 549–550 factors affecting, 170 fractionation and, 60, 295–297 hydrogenation and, 57, 110, 118–119, 289–291 interesterification and, 291–295 of lard, 54–55, 209, 348, 349, 387, 527, 611 of margarine lauric oils and, 465 posthardening, 464 rating of, 209 roll-in, 209, 466, 469–470 SFI profile of, 457, 457 soft-tub, 180–181, 451–452, 461, 468, 646–647 stick, 180, 452, 467–468, 647 temperature and, 467, 648 test for, 209–210 troubleshooting, 609–611, 645–648 of milk fat, 60 packaging and, 180 plasticization and, 170–176, 288–289, 548–549 rating of, 209, 236 SFI and, 121, 203, 205–206, 457, 630–631 of shortenings biscuit, 388–389 control of, 547–548 cookie fillers, 385 creaming gas and, 548, 609–611, 630 crème fillings, 377, 385
673
Danish pastry, 390 household, 439 icing, 377, 378 liquid, 548, 611–613 pressure and, 631 puff paste, 392–393 roll-in, 209, 469–470 tests for, 236 troubleshooting, 609–614, 630–631 yeast-raised dough, 356 of soybean oil, 18 of spreads, 209 stress and, 288 structure and, 302 of tallow, 57, 348, 527 tempering for, 182 Contamination analysis for, 198–201 commingling; See Commingling during deodorization, 594 flavor/odor and, 169, 626–627 during frying, 400–401, 634 during handling/storage, 169, 190, 568 moisture; See Moisture during prebleaching, 531 during shipment, 190 Continuous phase, 482 Control charts, 518 Control points for crude products, 527 establishment of, 525 for flaking, 555 for liquid oils, 554 for liquid shortening, 550–552 for margarine, 557 for postbleaching, 542–543 for prebleaching, 530–532 for refining, 528–529 for shortening, 549–552 for spreads, 557 Converters, 116–118 Cookie fillers, 52, 206, 259, 308, 353, 384–386, 386 Cookies, 60, 308, 317, 348, 368, 384, 403 Cooking oils applications for, 476, 552 blends, 479, 480 canola oil for, 38, 477–480, 477 corn oil for, 477–480, 477, 552 cottonseed oil for, 20, 477–479, 477, 552 description of, 473, 552 for frying, 473 household, 479–481 industrial, 481–482
674 Index
NLEA on, 479, 480 olive oil for, 475, 477, 478–479, 552–554 packaging of, 189, 480–481 peanut oil for, 477–479, 477, 552–554 PGEs and, 151 safflower oil for, 477 vs. salad oil, 133, 474 soybean oil for, 477–480, 477 storage of, 189 sunflower oil for, 474, 479–480, 552 usage of, 476, 477 Copper bleaching and, 83, 144, 542 classification of, 13 degumming and, 83 deodorization and, 160 flavor and, 626 frying and, 256, 401, 404, 636, 642 in menhaden oil, 62 oxidative stability and, 13, 542, 627 phosphoric acid and, 88 in soybean oil, 16 Copper chromite, 115 Copra, 3, 48, 74, 77 Corn, 3, 3, 25–26, 28, 99, 624, 633 Corn chips, 421 Corn oil antioxidants in, 27 AOCS evaluation method for, 98 AOM stability of, 26, 484 arachidic fatty acid in, 27 Baumé concentration for, 90, 528 behenic fatty acid in, 27 bleaching of, 530–531, 579 calories from, 480 characteristics of, 26–28 chemical refining of, 90 chill test for, 542 cholesterol in, 9, 480 cloud point of, 26 cold test of, 26, 484, 542 color of, 26, 484, 542 consumption of, 5, 6 for cooking oil, 477–480, 477, 552 crystal habit of, 27, 215, 287 deodorization of, 27–28, 155, 477 dewaxing of, 27, 479, 481–482, 542 discussion of, 25–28 ferulic acid in, 27 FFA in, 484, 542 flavor of, 27, 28, 280, 280, 478, 484 gadoleic fatty acid in, 27 genetically modified, 28 in hard butters, 311
hardening of, 290–291 interesterification of, 295, 464 iodine value of, 26, 278, 484, 542 linoleic fatty acid in, 26–28, 27, 338, 478 linolenic fatty acid in, 27, 27, 478 liquid dilution factor calculations for, 330 for margarine, 450, 451, 451 marketing of, 7 for mayonnaise, 478, 483 melting point of, 26, 26, 27 moisture in, 542 monounsaturated fatty acids in, 480, 484 myristic fatty acid in, 27 nutritional labeling on, 480 odor of, 478 oleic fatty acid in, 26, 27, 28 omega fatty acids in, 480, 484 oxidation of, 27 oxidative stability of, 26–28, 26, 278 palmitic fatty acid in, 27, 215 palmitoleic fatty acid in, 27 peanut oil and, 23 peroxide value of, 484 PGEs of, 151 phosphatides in, 9 polyunsaturated fatty acids in, 26, 27, 480 production of, 4 refining of, 80, 82, 98 refractive index of, 26 safflower oil and, 35 for salad dressing, 478 for salad oil, 27, 474, 477–482, 477 saponification number of, 26 saturated fatty acids in, 27, 478, 480, 484 SFI profile of, 295, 329, 330 for shortenings, 28, 352, 353, 410 solidification point, 26 specific gravity of, 26 steaming of, 82 stearic fatty acid in, 27 sterols in, 9 structure of, 27 sulfur in, 530–531, 579 sunflower oil and, 28–29 titer test of, 26 tocols in, 9, 26, 27–28 trans fatty acids in, 480, 484 triglyceride composition of, 27 unsaponifiable matter in, 9, 26 unsaturated fatty acids in, 27 wax in, 26, 27, 140, 474, 540 yield, 3 Corn sugar, 385, 418 Costs, quality, 518–520
Index
Cotton bollworms, 22 Cottonseed oil antioxidants in, 20 AOCS evaluation method for, 98 AOM stability of, 21, 484, 555 arachidic fatty acid in, 21, 138, 290, 427, 491 availability of, 348 in basestocks, 302, 303, 306 Baumé concentration for, 90, 528 behenic fatty acid in, 21, 290, 427, 491 bleaching of, 229, 348, 567 blending of, 18, 294, 329, 330, 331, 427, 631 bump factors, 332 butyric fatty acid in, 427 calories from, 480 capric fatty acid in, 427 caproic fatty acid in, 427 caprylic fatty acid in, 427 CBRs from, 143 characteristics of, 20–22 chemical refining of Baumé concentration for, 90 development of, 348 discussion of, 20 excess caustic for, 89, 571 gossypol and, 13, 80, 83, 89 miscella, 94 re-refining of, 92 short-mix method, 92 sodium hydroxide for, 90 cholesterol in, 9, 480 cloud point of, 21 cold test of, 21 AOCS on, 137 vs. canola, 484 vs. corn oil, 484 development of, 208 history, 133 as quality standard, 541, 555 salad oil, 138 vs. soybean oil, 138, 484 vs. sunflower oil, 484 color of climate and, 565 crude, 20 cyclopropenoids and, 22 Halphen test, 22 quality standards for, 555 refining, 89, 526 salad oil, 484 troubleshooting, 565 winterized, 541 yellow; See Gossypol consistency of, 20
675
consumption of, 5, 6–7, 6 for cooking oil, 20, 477–479, 477, 552 crystal habit of, 21, 287 vs. lard, 287 palmitic fatty acid, 20, 215, 286–287 palm oil and, 45–47, 215 plasticity and, 306 soybean blend, 18, 631 stearic fatty acid, 215 structure of, 20, 286–287 triglyceride composition, 286–287 crystallization of, 138–139, 539 cyclopropenoid fatty acids in, 22 deodorization of, 20, 22, 153, 348, 438, 475, 477 discussion of, 19–22 emulsion stability of, 30 erucic fatty acid in, 21, 491 factors affecting, 20 FFA in, 20, 484, 537, 541, 555 flavor of deodorization and, 153, 348 deterioration of, 626 fried foods, 280, 410 history, 348 hydrogenation and, 153 light and, 626 quality standards for, 555 reversion of, 280–281, 280 salad oil, 484, 625 snack frying, 280 as standard, 20 steaming and, 153, 348 winterization and, 138 fractionation of, 30, 45, 133–134, 138, 138, 296 gadoleic fatty acid in, 21, 427, 491 genetically modified, 22 glycerolysis with, 147 gossypol in; See Gossypol Halphen test for, 22 in hard butters, 311 hardening of, 291 hydrogenation of, 290, 303, 349–350, 442 interesterification of all-purpose shortening, 367 crystal habit, 292 household shortenings, 443 linolenic fatty acid, 281 melting point, 126, 336 plasticity, 336 quality standards for, 537 SFI profile, 336 soybean blend, 294
676 Index
iodine value of, 21, 138, 278 hardfat, 303 high-stability, 491 hydrogenation, 290 palm kernel blend, 427 quality standards for, 541, 555 salad oil, 138, 484 soybean blend, 427 stearin, 138 steep, 303 winterized, 137 lard and, 19–20, 348–350, 352, 438 lauric fatty acid in, 427, 491 lignoceric fatty acid in, 21 linoleic fatty acid in, 21, 138, 290 discussion of, 20, 22, 338 hardfat, 303 hydrogenation and, 290 palm kernel blend, 427 salad oil, 138 SFI profile of, 303 solvent extraction, 137 soybean blend, 427, 491 stearin, 137, 138 winterized, 137 linolenic fatty acid in, 16, 21, 138, 290, 303, 427, 491 liquid dilution factor calculations for, 330 malvalic fatty acid in, 22 margaric fatty acid in, 427, 491 for margarine, 449, 451, 460, 461 for mayonnaise, 30, 133, 138, 483 melting point of, 21, 126, 127, 183, 336 Mettler dropping point of, 290, 303, 427, 537 miscella refining for, 94 moisture in, 537, 541, 555 monounsaturated fatty acids in, 480, 484 myristic fatty acid in, 21, 137, 138, 290, 303, 427, 491 myristoleic fatty acid in, 427 nutritional labeling on, 480 oleic fatty acid in, 21, 138, 290 discussion of, 20, 22 hardfat, 303 hydrogenation and, 290 palm kernel blend, 427 salad oil, 137, 138 solvent extraction, 137 soybean blend, 427, 491 stearin, 137, 138 steep, 303 winterized, 137 olive oil and, 348
omega fatty acids in, 480, 484 oxidation of, 20, 572 oxidative stability of, 21, 278, 491 palmitic fatty acid in, 21, 138, 491 crystal habit and, 20, 215 discussion of, 22, 268 hardfat, 303 hydrogenation and, 290 vs. lard, 287 palm kernel blend, 427 vs. palm oil, 45 salad oil, 138 soybean blend, 427 stearin, 138 steep, 303 winterized, 137, 138 palmitoleic fatty acid in, 21, 138, 290 discussion of, 20 hardfat, 303 hydrogenation and, 290 palm kernel blend, 427 salad oil, 138 solvent extraction, 137 soybean blend, 427, 491 stearin, 137, 138 steep, 303 winterized, 137 penetration test, 365 pentadelandic fatty acid in, 427 peroxide value of, 484, 537, 541, 555 PGEs of, 151 pH for, 528 phosphatides in, 9 phosphoric acid and, 565 plasticity of, 20, 306–308 polyunsaturated fatty acids in, 480 production of, 4 refining efficiency of, 98 refractive index of, 21 re-refining of, 92 for salad dressing, 138 for salad oil applications, 138 cold test, 138 discussion of, 477–479 fatty acids in, 137, 138 history, 133, 474 iodine value, 137, 138 quality standards for, 555 SFI profile, 137 U.S. usage, 477 saponification number of, 21 saturated fatty acids in, 20, 22, 145, 441, 480, 484, 555
Index
SFI profile of hardfat, 303 hydrogenation, 290 interesterification, 336 palm blend, 331 palm kernel blend, 427 quality standards for, 537 soybean blend, 329, 330, 427 steep, 303 winterized, 137 for shortenings all-purpose, 364–365, 364, 366, 367, 545 cookie fillers, 385, 386 crème fillings, 377, 378 Crisco, 349, 438 frying; See under Frying shortenings, cottonseed oil for history, 348–350, 352 household, 438, 441, 442, 443 icing, 377, 378 puff paste, 393 U.S. usage, 352 soap in, 537 solidification point, 21 for sour cream analogs, 434 soybean oil and all-purpose shortening, 545 cost, 15 crystal habit, 18, 183 dairy analog, 427 high-stability, 491 history, 7, 20 interesterification, 294 linolenic fatty acid, 16 U.S. usage, 16–17 specifications for, 228 specific gravity of, 21 steaming of, 20, 348 stearic fatty acid in, 21, 138, 290 discussion of, 22 hardfat, 303 hydrogenation and, 290 palm kernel blend, 427 salad oil, 138 solvent extraction, 137 soybean blend, 427, 491 stearin, 137, 138 steep, 303 winterized, 137 sterculic fatty acid in, 22 sterols in, 9 storage of, 567, 595 structure of, 22 sunflower oil and, 29
677
tallow and, 145, 153, 410 TBHQ in, 555 titer test of, 21, 207, 303 tocols in, 9, 21 trans fatty acids in, 290, 303, 427, 480, 484, 555 triglyceride composition of, 21, 22 unsaponifiable matter in, 9, 20, 21 unsaturated fatty acids in, 22 winterization of control of, 137, 540 fatty acids and, 137 history, 133, 474 household, 479 industrial, 481 iodine value, 137 quality standards for, 541 SFI profile of, 137 solvent, 136–137 time-temperature sequence, 136 yield, 3 Cottonseeds, 2–3, 3, 20, 22, 74–78 Cows, milk from; See Milk Crackers, 32, 223–224, 395, 396, 492 Creaming gas for margarines, 172, 174, 181, 468, 469 for shortenings consistency and, 548, 609–611, 630 discussion of, 172 frying, 644 functions of, 444 plasticity and, 176 quality standards for, 551 Creaming volume test, 230–231, 242, 630 Cream of tartar, 392 Crème fillings, 232, 249–250, 318, 376–378, 430 Crisco, 349, 438 Crusher/refiner plants, 73 Crystal habit aeration and, 357 alpha; See Alpha-crystals beta; See Beta-crystals beta-prime; See Beta-prime-crystals of canola oil, 38, 39, 215, 286, 287 cloud point and, 177 of cocoa butter, 287 of coconut oil, 49, 287 consistency and, 55, 288, 631, 646 of corn oil, 27, 215, 287 of cottonseed oil; See under Cottonseed oil, crystal habit of discussion of, 285–288 emulsifiers and, 132, 150, 152, 324 fat flakes and, 286
678 Index
flavor and, 648 formulations and, 264 fractionation and, 141, 539 of high-oleic safflower oil, 36 of high-oleic sunflower oil, 33 interchangeability and, 334 interesterification and, 335 beta-prime structure, 292, 336, 442, 535 beta structure, 292, 535 canola blend, 294 coconut blend, 294 cottonseed blend, 294 emulsifiers and, 132 of lard, 45, 124 palm blend, 294 soybean blend, 294 of lard, 54, 287 all-purpose shortening, 367 discussion of, 54–55 interesterification and, 45, 124 palmitic fatty acid and, 215, 268, 287 pie crusts, 388 lecithin and, 324 long-chain fatty acids and, 291 of margarine consistency and, 646 evolution of, 460 liquid, 181, 310, 312, 461, 469 tempering and, 183 melting point and, 202 of menhaden oil, 287 of milk fat, 59, 60, 287 of NuSun sunflower oil, 31 of olive oil, 42, 287 palmitic fatty acid and, 20, 215, 268, 286–287 of palm kernel oil, 51, 287 of palm oil, 45–47, 45, 47, 215, 287 of peanut oil, 24, 215, 287 plasticization and, 306 properties of, 286 of rapeseed oil, 287 of safflower oil, 34, 287 set up time and, 417 of shortenings all-purpose, 365, 367, 370 biscuit, 389 cookies, 384 crème fillings, 377–378 Danish pastry, 391 frying, 334, 410, 411 icing, 377–378 liquid; See under Liquid shortening, crystal habit of pie crusts, 287, 334, 387, 388
plasticity and, 306 puff paste, 393 troubleshooting, 622, 631 of soybean oil; See under Soybean oil, crystal habit of stearic fatty acid and, 287 structure and, 171–172, 215, 285, 287 of sunflower oil, 30, 287, 584 of tallow, 57, 57, 287 tempering and, 182–183, 183 transformation rate, 141, 171, 285–286 winterization and, 135 Crystallization in beaded/powdered fats, 188 of canola oil, 39 cold test and, 137, 208, 326 consistency and, 209 control of; See Plasticization of cottonseed oil, 138–139, 539 definition of, 417 in dewaxing, 139–140 DSC analysis for, 127–128, 206 emulsifiers and, 313, 318, 323, 363 in fat flakes, 186–187, 555, 614–615 in fractionation, 141–144, 296, 539 hardfats and, 311 heat of definition of, 186 in fat flakes, 187, 555, 614–615 in interesterification, 130 in lard, 128 in liquid margarine, 469 in packages, 609 in plasticization, 172–176, 181 in puff paste shortening, 394 in shortening chips, 395 in shortening flakes, 614–615 in soft-tub margarines, 468 spray cooling for, 188 titer test and, 207 winterization and, 136 interesterification and, 55, 123, 124, 130–132, 291–295, 335–336, 367 of lard, 55, 128 of margarine, 172, 174, 179–182, 468, 469, 609–610 packaging and, 189, 609 of palm oil, 47, 335, 366, 610 in plasticization, 170–183 of shortenings all-purpose, 364–365 bread, 312 cake mix, 373 chips, 395
Index
679
discussion of, 171–176 donuts, 419 flakes, 614–615 frying, 405, 412 household, 444 liquid, 176–177, 357–358, 374, 553, 612–614 liquid bread, 381 puff paste, 394 troubleshooting, 609–610 solidification and, 207 of soybean oil, 138–139, 312, 539 sterols and, 11 of sunflower oil, 584 tempering and, 182–185 trans fatty acids and, 459 in winterization, 133–139 Curd, 558 Customer instruction specifications, 506–508, 507 Cyclopropenoid fatty acids in cottonseed oil, 22 malvalic, 22 physiological effects from, 22 sterculic, 22 Cyprus, 3 Czechoslovakia, 3
D Dairy analogs advantages of, 425 carbohydrates for, 426 cheeses, 431–432 development of, 425 mellorine; See Mellorine milk, 434, 435 nondairy creamers, 426–429 proteins for, 426 shortenings for, 426, 427 sour cream, 433–434 stabilizers for, 426 sugars for, 426 sweetened condensed milk, 434–435 types of, 425 whipped toppings, 429–431 Dairy products acid degumming and, 100 availability of, 4, 425 consumption of, 4–7, 6 in diet, 4
filled, 425 flavor of, 60 imitation, 425 Danish pastry emulsifiers for, 146, 314 margarine for, 146, 182, 314, 391, 466, 469 production of, 389–390 shortenings for, 356, 361, 389–392, 391 DATEM, 315, 380 Decenoic fatty acid, 214 Decomposition of antioxidants, 599 of carotene, 567 of chlorophyll, 13 of citric acid, 161, 596 off-flavor from, 564–565, 626 of phosphoric acid, 596 rancidity and, 217 of soybeans, 564–565 temperature and, 125 Deep-fat frying test, 233–234, 256–257 Degumming acid; See Acid degumming bleaching and, 86, 87 calcium and, 13, 85 of canola oil, 37, 87 before chemical refining, 83, 528, 574 of coconut oil, 86 color of gums, 570 description of, 83 dewaxing and, 139, 584 dry, 82, 83, 86 enzymatic, 86–87 expanders and, 76 expelling and, 77 FFA and, 86 filtration in, 86 flavor and, 595 hydrolysis and, 84 lecithin processing and, 9, 84, 85, 100, 570 membrane filter, 87–88 of menhaden oil, 61 for miscella refining, 94 oilseed quality and, 571 of palm kernel oil, 86 of palm oil, 81, 86 phosphatides and, 8–9, 83–86, 571 phospholipases for, 86–87 phospholipids and, 86–88 phosphorus and, 83, 85–88 in physical refining, 81, 82, 83 on process flow chart, 75 silica and, 87, 97 sodium and, 13
680 Index
of soybean oil, 16, 87–88, 570, 595 before steaming, 81, 83, 86 of sunflower oil, 87 of tallow, 86 from tank sweating, 568 trace metals and, 13, 83, 85, 87 troubleshooting, 570–571 water; See Water degumming waxes and, 83 yield from, 570 Denmark, 3 Deodorization air exposure during, 592–597 aldehydes and, 153–154 antioxidants and, 10, 591, 596, 599 bleaching and, 105, 158 blending and, 152, 596 of canola oil, 156, 274 carbon and, 104 carbon dioxide and, 591 carotenoids and, 154, 155, 544, 592 chelation and, 160–161 chemical refining and, 155, 158–159 chlorophyll and, 39 citric acid and, 161, 591–593, 596 of coconut oil, 155 color and, 591–593 contamination during, 594 control of, 160–161, 544–546 of corn oil, 27–28, 155, 477 of cottonseed oil, 20, 22, 153, 348, 438, 475, 477 cyclopropenoid fatty acids and, 22 definition of, 153 description of, 153–164 dewaxing and, 139, 140 distillates from, 13, 99, 161–164 Dowtherm contamination, 624 equipment used in, 16, 154, 156–162 expelling and, 77 factors affecting, 160–161 FFA and control points for, 544–545 discussion of, 153–158 pressure and, 161 salad oil, 484 specifications for, 161, 162, 221 steam for, 80, 161 temperature and, 161 troubleshooting, 221, 590–591 filtration in, 161 flavor and, 153, 348, 594–596 hydrogenation and, 155 after interesterification, 126, 538
isomerization during, 274, 589–590 of lard, 55, 527 lecithin and, 161 loss during, 594 medium-chain fatty acids and, 589 of menhaden oil, 61 Merrill system for, 159 odor from, 161–163 of olive oil, 475 oxidation during, 157–158, 592–596 of palm kernel oil, 155 of peanut oil, 477, 552–554 peroxide and, 153–154, 160, 162, 544, 592–595 pesticides and, 13, 99, 161, 164 of PGEs, 151 phosphatides and, 591–592 phosphoric acid and, 161, 591–593, 595–596 physical refining and, 82, 82, 155, 158 pigments and, 154–155 pressure for, 154–158, 161, 162, 590 on process flow chart, 75 short-chain fatty acids and, 155, 546, 589 of shortenings, 547 soap and, 591 of soybean oil, 16, 17, 156, 274 spectrophotometry and, 227 steaming in, 82, 153–164, 162, 590–592, 594, 596–598 sterols and, 12, 155, 590 of sunflower oil, 29, 274 of tallow, 55–56, 527 temperature for, 154–159, 161, 162, 408–409, 589–596 THF systems for, 159 time for, 156, 162 tocols and excessive removal, 590 loss during, 10, 217 oxidative stability, 544 retention time, 158 stripping process, 161–162 temperature and, 155, 596 trace metals and, 155, 160 trans fatty acids and, 155, 158, 161, 274, 546, 589–590, 596 troubleshooting, 589–598 vacuum for, 597 washout after, 593 wastewater from, 162–163 Wesson system for, 153, 159, 348 Design, quality of, 518–520 Detergent fractionation, 47, 141–143, 490, 539
Index
Dewaxing bleaching and, 139, 140 of canola oil, 479 chemical refining and, 140 chill test for, 140, 208, 541 cold test for, 140, 208, 541 control of, 140, 540–541 of corn oil, 27, 479, 481–482, 542 crystallization in, 139–140 degumming and, 139, 584 deodorization and, 139, 140 filtration in, 139, 584 iodine value and, 541 in physical refining, 82 processes for, 139–140 on process flow chart, 75 purpose of, 139, 141 of safflower oil, 479 solvent, 140 specifications for, 139 of sunflower oil, 30, 479, 584 troubleshooting, 584 DHA; See Docosahexaenoic acid Diacetyl, 454 Diacetyl tartaric acid esters of monoglyceride (DATEM), 315, 380 Diatomaceous earths, 55, 94, 529, 538, 566, 584, 587 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 267, 269, 273, 300, 441, 459 Diet margarine, 450 Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), 127–128, 206, 212 Diglycerides alcoholysis of, 146 analysis of, 221 applications for, 146, 314 crystal habit and, 132 deodorization and, 161 direct esterification of, 146 discussion of, 146–148, 314–316 forms of, 147, 314 frying and, 406 functionality of, 315, 323 GRAS status of, 314 grinding of, 188 HLB value of, 320–321, 321 hydrolysis and, 283 in interesterification, 125–126, 132, 538, 580 iodine value for, 381 in margarine, 454, 458, 558 olein and, 47 in olive oil, 41 oxidation and, 628
681
in palm oil, 45, 47, 335, 366, 464 PGMEs and, 152, 324 process flow chart for, 149 SFC and, 132 in shortenings all-purpose, 368–370 bread, 146, 150, 314, 379–383 cake, 547, 548 cake mix, 371–372 crème fillings, 377–378 Danish pastry, 146, 314 donuts, 418 household, 438 icing, 377–378, 547, 548 liquid, 374 liquid bread, 382 puff paste, 393 sweet doughs, 383 yeast-raised dough, 380 in spreads, 648 types of, 146–147 for whipped toppings, 431 Dihomo-gamma-linolenic fatty acid, 214, 266, 271, 272 Dilatometry, 203–206, 289 Dimethylpolysiloxane in high-oleic sunflower oil, 413 in shortenings all-purpose, 409 bakery frying, 368, 403, 417 donuts, 403, 417 heavy-duty, 410, 413 liquid, 357, 411, 413 pan and grill, 415 snacks, 421 stability and, 402–403 Dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, 489 Diphenyl, 159 Diphenyl oxide, 159 Directed interesterification of corn oil, 295 of cottonseed oil, 443 definition of, 124 discussion of, 130–131, 295 for liquid oil, 535 for margarine, 461–464 of safflower oil, 295 for shortenings, 367, 443 of sunflower oil, 295 trans fatty acids and, 336 Disaturated triglycerides (SSU) in canola oil, 38 in corn oil, 27 in cottonseed oil, 21, 22
682 Index
in interesterification, 291, 294, 463 in lard, 55 melting point of, 284, 291 in peanut oil, 24 in soft-tub margarines, 462 in soybean oil, 18 in sunflower oil, 30 in winterization, 135 Disaturated triglycerides (SUS) in canola oil, 38 in coconut oil, 49 in corn oil, 27 in cottonseed oil, 21, 22 in high-oleic safflower oil, 36 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 33 in interesterification, 127 in lard, 54, 54 in NuSun sunflower oil, 31 in olive oil, 42 in palm oil, 45, 46, 47, 335, 366 purpose of, 123 in soybean oil, 18 in sunflower oil, 30 in tallow, 57 in vegetable oils, 126 Dispersed phase, 482 Diunsaturated triglycerides (USU), 22 Diunsaturated triglycerides (UUS), 22, 294, 463 Docosadienoic fatty acid, 214 Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) from algae, 64, 338 in algal oil, 65 CLA and, 275 classification of, 7 constants for, 214 in diet, 271, 337 FDA on, 272–273, 300, 456 in fish oil, 61–64 health claims on, 299–300 linolenic conversion to, 337 in margarine, 450 melting point and, 266 menhaden oil and, 61–63, 62, 63 methylene groups, 277 in milk, 339 omega designation, 266, 271 oxidation and, 277 Pavlova salina and, 15 positioning of, 7, 63 Docosatetraenoic fatty acid, 214 Dodecyl gallate, 455 Donuts, 308, 315, 403, 405, 416, 417–419 Dowtherm A, 159, 624 Dry degumming, 82, 83, 86
Dry fractionation assessment of, 539 dewaxing; See Dewaxing efficiency of, 296 for high-stability oils, 490 hydraulic pressing, 78, 141 of lauric oils, 142 of milk, 60 of palm kernel oil, 142 of palm oil, 47, 141, 142 pressure and, 539 stages of, 142, 539 winterization; See Winterization Dry-method batch refining, 95–96 Dry rendering, 79 DSC, 127–128, 206, 212
E Eckstein, Henry, 153 Ecuador, 3 EDTA; See Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid Eggs in cakes, 319 cholesterol in, 485 cyclopropenoid fatty acids and, 22 fat absorption and, 640 FFA and, 639 frying and, 637 lecithin in, 319, 485, 637 in mayonnaise, 482–483, 485–486 propyl gallate and, 167 proteins from, 485 in salad dressing, 487–488 shortening and, 369 stearoyl-2-lactylates and, 318 Egypt, 3 Eicosadienoic fatty acid, 40, 54, 65, 214 Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) from algae, 64 classification of, 7 constants for, 214 in diet, 271, 337 FDA on, 272–273, 300, 456 in fish oil, 61–64 in fungal oil, 66 in fungus, 65 health claims on, 299–300 linolenic conversion to, 15, 337 from linseed, 15 in margarine, 450
Index
melting point and, 266 menhaden oil and, 61–63, 62, 63 methylene groups, 277 nematodes and, 15 omega designation, 266, 271, 271 oxidation and, 277 positioning of, 7, 63 sources of, 65 stearidonic fatty acid and, 15, 271 zebra fish and, 15 Eicosatetraenoic fatty acid, 54, 57 Eicosatrienoic fatty acid, 66 Elaesis guineensis, 43, 50 Elaesis oleifera, 48 Elaidic fatty acid, 112, 266, 273–274, 308 Eleostearic fatty acid, 266 Elosstearic fatty acid, 266 EMG, 150, 380, 383 Emulsification value, 232 Emulsifiers aeration and, 631–632 alcoholysis of, 146, 585 analysis of, 215–216 blending of, 321 for bread; See under Bread, emulsifiers for for cakes, 150, 152, 315, 316–318, 322–323, 632 CFRs on, 314 chill roll coolant temperatures, 186 classification of, 320 color of, 585–586 consistency of, 147, 150 for cookies, 317, 384 crystal habit and, 132, 150, 152, 324 crystallization and, 313, 318, 323, 363 in dairy analogs, 426 for Danish pastry, 146, 314 definition of, 312, 323 direct esterification of, 146 for donuts, 315, 418, 419 factors affecting, 313, 585–588 FFA in, 586, 588, 607 filling sandwich test for, 250 frying and, 633–634, 636, 638 functions of, 285, 312–313, 323–324, 323 from glycerolysis, 147–148, 149, 586–587 GRAS status for, 314 HLB value of, 320–323, 321–322 hydrolysis and, 588 for ice cream, 151, 317 for icing, 315 lubricity and, 312 for margarine, 178–179, 315, 318, 454, 458, 558, 645
683
for mellorine, 151, 317, 433 melting point of, 185 Mettler dropping point and, 605 moisture and, 313, 316 nitrogen for, 585 for nondairy creamers, 429 oxidation and, 215–216, 313 oxidative stability and, 585, 628 pH analysis of, 586 phosphoric acid and, 587–588, 591, 592 for pie crusts, 316 plasticity and, 308 postbleaching of, 585 powdered hard, 187 production of, 146, 585 selection of, 320–325 for shortenings all-purpose, 362–363, 362, 368–370, 369, 375, 634 bread, 379–381 cake, 146, 547, 548 cake mix, 371–373 crème fillings, 232, 249–250, 377–378 donuts, 419 icing, 370, 377–378 liquid, 177, 374, 550 liquid bread, 381 puff paste, 146, 308, 314, 393 specialty cakes, 373–374 sweet doughs, 383 smoke point and, 221, 639 soybean oil and, 151, 317 for spreads, 315, 318, 645, 648 stability of, 376 steaming for, 147, 149, 586, 588 trace metals and, 585–586 troubleshooting, 585–588 turbidimeters and, 200 types of, 146–153, 313–320 weep test for, 250 for whipped toppings, 430–431, 431 white layer tests for, 232, 245–248 for yeast-raised dough; See under Yeastraised dough, emulsifiers for Emulsion, 482 Enzymatic degumming, 86–87 Enzymatic interesterification, 124, 131–132, 279, 292, 538 EPA; See Eicosapentaenoic acid Epicatechin gallate, 282, 627 Erucic fatty acid behenic fatty acid and, 270 in canola oil, 38, 40, 270, 354 classification of, 7
684 Index
constants for, 214 in cottonseed oil, 21, 491 FDA on, 270 health and, 37, 270 in high-oleic safflower oil, 491 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 33, 491 iodine value and, 119 in marine oils, 62, 63, 270 melting point and, 266 omega designation, 266 in peanut oil, 24 positioning of, 7 in rapeseed oil, 14, 37, 268–270, 354 refractive index and, 119 sources of, 270 in soybean oil, 18, 491 in sunflower oil, 30 Escherichia coli, 645 Essential fatty acids in diet, 272–273, 337 linoleic; See Linoleic fatty acid linolenic; See Linolenic fatty acid research on, 270 in shortenings, 438 sources of, 337–338 Esterification, 146, 585–588 Ethanol, 132 Ethoxylated monoglycerides (EMG), 150, 380, 383 Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) functions of, 169, 283 for margarine, 455 for mayonnaise, 483 rosemary and, 282 for salad dressing, 282, 487, 489 trace metals and, 627 Ethylene oxide, 150, 317 Excellent Source Nutrient Content Claim, 456 Expanders, 75, 76, 77, 563, 571 Expeller pressing, 75, 76–77 Extra virgin olive oil, 41
F Fair Packaging and Labeling Act, 520 Fat flakes applications for, 363, 381 chill rolls for, 185–187, 186, 554–555, 614–618, 620 color of, 556, 617–620 crystal habit and, 286
crystallization in, 186–187, 555, 614–615 description of, 185 FFA in, 616–617 formation of, 359 iodine value of, 620–621 melting point of, 185 packaging of, 554–555, 615, 620 shortening; See Shortening flakes size of, 617 tempering of, 617 thickness of, 187 troubleshooting, 187, 614–621 Fats animal; See Animal fats availability of, 4 characteristics of, 1, 7–8, 263–265 consumption of, 4–7, 6 in diet, 273 as energy source, 1 formulation of, 263–265 interchangeability of, 333–334 processing of, 73–74, 75 sources of, 1, 2, 6 structure of, 7–8 tests for; See Performance tests traceability of, 513–515 withdrawal of, 513 Fatty Acid Committee (FAC) method, 226 Fatty acids boiling point of, 154 characteristics of, 7–8, 265 cis; See Cis fatty acids distribution of, 8 essential; See Essential fatty acids factors affecting, 8 long-chain; See Long-chain fatty acids medium-chain; See Medium-chain fatty acids molecular weight of, 58 saturated; See Saturated fatty acids short-chain; See Short-chain fatty acids trans; See Trans fatty acids unsaturated; See Unsaturated fatty acids FDA; See Food and Drug Administration FDA Modernization Act, 299 Federal Trade Commission, 449 Fermentation, 275 Ferulic acid, 27 FFA; See Free fatty acid Fiber optic spectometers, 126–127 Filled print system, 180, 468 Filtration adhesion, 78 bleaching and, 108–109, 575–576, 581 blinding during, 108, 575
Index
body feed in, 108 cakes, oil extraction from, 109–110 for chlorophyll, 88 control of, 531 in degumming, 86 in deodorization, 161 in dewaxing, 139, 584 in finishing, 169 in flaking, 618 flavor and, 595 in fractionation, 296 of frying shortening, 637, 639, 641–643 hydrogenation and, 116, 144, 542 of lard, 55, 529 in miscella refining, 94 of palm oil, 81 press effect in, 107 on process flow chart, 75 for proteins, 55, 527, 529 before shipment, 600–601 smoke point and, 639 steps of, 107 of tallow, 55, 529 in winterization, 134, 583 Fine virgin olive oil, 41 Fish oil antioxidants for, 63, 627 availability of, 64 cholesterol in, 11, 62 cod liver, 624 factors affecting, 63 FDA on, 61 flavor reversion of, 277, 338 fractionation of, 464 frying and, 400 menhaden; See Menhaden oil oleic fatty acid and, 63 omega fatty acids in, 61–64, 337, 338 oxidation of, 63 pesticides in, 338 rendering for, 61 shark liver, 10 squalene in, 10 sterols in, 10–12 storage of, 629 TBHQ and, 63, 627 tocols and, 63, 627 trace metals in, 338 unsaturated fatty acids in, 63 Flaking for beaded fats, 187, 188, 359 of canola seeds, 37 citric acid and, 617, 620 color in, 556, 617–620
685
control points for, 555–556 of fat; See Fat flakes FFA and, 616–617 filtration in, 618 of hydrogenation catalyst, 114 hydrolysis after, 563 of icing stabilizers, 379 iodine value and, 620–621 lecithin and, 617–618, 621 in margarine process, 174 moisture and, 616 oxidation after, 563 of palm kernels, 50 phosphoric acid and, 617, 620 for powdered fats, 187, 188, 359 in process flow chart, 75 quality standards for, 556 rolls, 185–187 of seeds, 76 of shortening; See Shortening flakes of shortening chips, 358, 395 solvent extraction and, 77 of soybean oil, 556 of soybeans, 77 trace metals and, 618 troubleshooting, 187, 614–621 Flash point, 526 Flavones, 627 Flavonoids, 627 Flavor agitation and, 611 aldehydes and, 454 analysis of, 217–219 antioxidants and, 166–167, 216, 596 AOCS on, 219 bleaching and, 153, 595 of butter, 60, 153, 267, 280, 454 butyric fatty acid and, 454–455 of canola oil, 280, 484, 625 caproic/caprylic fatty acids and, 52 chemical refining and, 89 citric acid and, 596 of coconut oil, 50, 280 of corn, 624 of corn oil, 27, 28, 280, 280, 478, 484 of cottonseed oil; See under Cottonseed oil, flavor of crystal habit and, 648 cyclopropenoid fatty acids and, 22 degumming and, 595 deodorization and, 153, 348, 594–596 factors affecting, 60, 217 filtration and, 595 of fish oil, 277, 338
686 Index
formulations and, 264 fractionation and, 60 free radicals and, 166 of fried foods, 280, 353, 410, 413–414, 413, 640–643 glycerine and, 147 of high-oleic oils, 270, 413–414, 413 hydrogenation and, 36, 110, 153, 533 hydrolysis and, 50, 217, 276, 280 intensity of, 218, 218 of lard, 153, 280, 566, 624 lauric fatty acid and, 52, 625 of lauric oils, 52, 641 of lecithin, 100, 320 light exposure and, 166, 189, 596, 603–604, 626 linoleic fatty acid and, 14, 28, 57, 281, 595 linolenic fatty acid and, 16, 57, 138, 281, 595 of liquid coffee whiteners, 428 long-chain fatty acids and, 220, 338 of margarine, 174, 450, 454–455, 558, 648–649 of menhaden oil, 61, 280 of milk fat, 58, 60 moisture and, 198 myrosinase and, 76 nitrogen and, 595 off; See Off-flavor oleic fatty acid and, 28, 36, 270 of olive oil, 41, 43, 74, 153, 280 oxidation and antioxidants, 368 causes of, 275 exposure level, 595 hydrogenation, 626 liquid oil packaging, 189 nitrogen and, 595 peroxide value, 164, 595 reversion, 280–281, 640 saturates, 626 unsaturates, 164, 640–641 packaging and, 189, 603–604, 649 of palm kernel oil, 52, 280 of palm oil, 43, 280 of peanut oil, 23, 280, 641 peroxide and, 160, 164, 595 phosphatides and, 595 phospholipases and, 16 phosphoric acid and, 161, 595–596 polyunsaturated fatty acids and, 484, 640 proteins and, 625 rancid, 625, 649 of safflower oil, 35, 280, 626 of salad oil, 484, 484
short-chain fatty acids and, 52, 220, 267, 627 of shortenings cake, 547, 548, 551 chips, 394 of crème fillings, 376 frying, 638 household, 439 icing, 376, 547, 548, 551 liquid, 553, 613 of soap, 625 of soybean oil; See under Soybean oil, flavor of stability of, 264 steaming and, 81, 82, 153 sulfur and, 531 of sunflower oil, 29, 280, 484, 625 of tallow, 57, 280, 566, 625 temperature and, 189, 595, 603 tocols and, 9 trace metals and, 16, 160, 626 troubleshooting, 624–627 Flavor reversion; See also Off-flavor antioxidants and, 596 of coconut oil, 280 of corn oil, 280 of cottonseed oil, 280 deodorization and, 594–596 discussion of, 280–281 of fish oil, 277, 338 light exposure and, 596 linoleic/linolenic fatty acids and, 57, 281, 595 nitrogen and, 595 oxidation and, 280–281, 595, 640 phosphatides and, 595 polyunsaturated fatty acids and, 484 of soybean oil, 16, 278, 280, 352 of tallow, 57 temperature and, 595 Flaxseed, 77 Flaxseed oil, 282 Foaming creaming gas and, 644 deep-fat test for, 234, 256–257, 257 dimethylpolysiloxane and; See Dimethylpolysiloxane discard point and, 408 emulsifiers and, 633–634 fat absorption and, 640 flavor and, 642 of high-oleic sunflower oil, 413, 414 lauric oils and, 353, 415, 633, 644 lecithin and, 415, 634 methyl silicone and, 632, 633, 635 packaging and, 639
Index
polymerization and, 401, 406, 634–637 polyunsaturated fatty acids and, 633 of shortenings, 413 soap and, 201, 633 stages of, 408 temperature and, 634 troubleshooting, 633–637, 639–640, 642, 644 turnover rate and, 634 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 167, 281 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on antioxidants, 167, 216 on bread emulsifiers, 380 on calories, 298 on cholesterol, 11, 456 on CLA, 58, 274 on DHA/EPA, 272–273, 300, 456 on erucic fatty acid, 270 on fish oil, 61 on health claims, 299–300 on LEAR oil, 37 on margarine, 60, 449, 453 on menhaden oil, 60–61 on misbranding, 533 NLEA and, 297–298 on omega-3 fatty acids, 61, 272–273, 456 on PGEs, 150 on recalls, 511–513 on saturated fatty acids, 11, 456 on shortenings, 441 on sterol/stanols, 11, 450, 456 on trans fatty acids, 274, 439 Food Chemical Codex, 500–501 Formic acid, 223 Forms complaint, 511, 512 customer instruction specification, 507 laboratory methods, 522–524, 523 procedure, 510 specification, 497–499, 498 specification change requisition, 516, 516 Fourier transform-near infrared (FT-NIR) spectroscopy, 212, 214 Fractionation advantages of, 142 of algal oils, 64 antioxidants and, 145, 279 AOM stability and, 143 of basestocks, 120 bleaching and, 144–145, 539 blending in, 144 of butter, 464 of canola oil, 39 cloud point and, 296, 297 of coconut oil, 142
687
consistency and, 60, 295–297 control of, 539 of cottonseed oil, 30, 45, 133–134, 138, 138, 296 crystal habit and, 141, 539 crystallization in, 141–144, 296, 539 detergent, 47, 141–143, 490, 539 dry; See Dry fractionation of fish oil, 464 flavor and, 60 for high-stability oils, 490 interesterification and, 132, 295 iodine value and, 296, 297 of lard, 142, 464 of lauric oils, 142, 144, 296 for margarine, 464 melting point and, 141, 295, 296, 297 of menhaden oil, 63, 63 of milk fat, 60 olein from; See Olein of olive oil, 78, 552 oxidation and, 279 oxidative stability and, 143, 337, 628 of palm kernel oil, 142, 297 of palm oil; See under Palm oil, fractionation of of peanut oil, 552 on process flow chart, 75 purpose of, 140–141, 532 refining and, 82, 539 of salad oil, 136, 474 SFC and, 296 for shortenings, 367–368 solvent, 132, 141–144, 490, 539 of soybean oil, 16, 17, 138, 296, 297 stages of, 141, 296 stearin from; See Stearin sterols and, 11 storage and, 629 of tallow, 142, 297, 464 tocols and, 337 trans fatty acids and, 336–337, 367 of triglycerides, 135 during winterization, 134–136, 474 France, 3, 447 Free fatty acid (FFA) analysis of, 197, 220–221 antioxidants and, 591, 607 AOCS on, 221, 617 AOM and, 651 bleaching and, 103, 104, 106–107, 530, 543 in canola oil, 484 carbon dioxide and, 591, 607, 632
688 Index
chemical refining and, 80, 88–90, 92, 96, 154, 529, 571–573 citric acid and, 543, 591, 607 in coconut oil, 90, 283 in corn oil, 484, 542 in cottonseed oil, 20, 484, 537, 541, 555 degumming and, 86 deodorization and; See under Deodorization, FFA and in emulsifiers, 586, 588, 607 in fat flakes, 616–617 frying and, 406 FT-NIR analysis for, 212 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 413 hydrogenation and, 533–535, 536 hydrolysis and, 221, 283, 607, 628 interesterification and, 129, 129, 131–132, 537–538, 580 iodine value and, 651 in lard, 55, 566 lipase and, 76 in margarine, 558 miscella refining and, 94 odor from, 153–154 oleic fatty acid and, 221 in olive oil, 41, 78 palmitic fatty acid and, 221 in palm kernel oil, 52, 90, 283 in palm oil, 79, 80 phosphoric acid and, 543, 592, 607 physical refining and, 80–82, 154 rancidity and, 220–221 raw material analysis of, 526–528 residual, 528 in salad oil, 484, 484 in shortenings; See under Shortening, FFA in short-mix method and, 92 smoke point and, 221, 639 in soybean oil; See under Soybean oil, FFA in steaming and, 79, 81, 154, 221, 566–567 storage and, 566–567 in sunflower oil, 484 in tallow, 55, 56, 530, 566 trace metals and, 628 wet-method batch refining and, 96 Free radicals antioxidants and, 166–167, 216, 281, 599, 627 beta-carotene and, 12 bleaching earths and, 629 conjugated fatty acids and, 628 odor and, 166 peroxides and, 166, 596 tocols and, 9, 217 French dressing, 488, 489–490
French fries drying of, 638 flavor of, 353 frying fat absorbed by, 400 preservatives in, 637 rinsing of, 633 shortening for, 56, 353, 410 Frying butter for, 414 cis fatty acids in, 406 cleaning after, 635 coconut oil for, 353, 415, 415, 641, 644 contamination during, 400–401, 634 continuous vs. intermittent, 401–402, 407 cooking oil for, 473 deep-fat test, 233–234, 256–257 emulsifiers and, 633, 636, 638 of fish, 400 food appearance, 643–644 frozen foods, 640 gums and, 401, 414, 634–637, 640 high-stability oils for, 491–492 historical background of, 399 hydrolysis and, 233, 406, 638, 640 lauric oils and, 353, 415, 633, 634 liquid oils for, 476 margarine for, 414, 453 of meat, 400 monounsaturates and, 491 oxidation in, 233, 256, 400–404, 406, 636 palm kernel oil for, 415, 415, 641, 644 of potatoes, 641 preservatives and, 637 process of, 399–400 product criteria, 405 shortenings for; See Frying shortening soap and, 201, 401, 633, 637, 638 submerged, 416 sugars and, 637 surface, 416 temperatures for, 400, 634–637, 639–644 trace metals and, 256, 400–401, 404, 636, 642 Frying shortening absorption of, 639–640 all-purpose, 409–410 animal-vegetable blends, 410 antioxidants in antifoamers and, 633, 635 color and, 636 heavy-duty, 410–411 odor and, 643 oxidation and, 406 snacks, 421 types of, 281–282, 403–404
Index
AOM stability of, 403, 413 bakery, 416–420 BHA and, 281–282, 403–404, 421 BHT and, 403–404, 421 break-in period, 638, 643 characteristics of, 404 citric acid and, 404, 421, 638 color of, 407 corn oil for, 28, 353, 410 cottonseed oil for cyclopropenoid fatty acids, 22 flavor, 280, 410 nuts, 422 pan and grill, 415, 415 potato chips, 22, 422, 478 tallow and, 410 trans fatty acids in, 412 creaming properties of, 410 crystal habit of, 287, 410 cyclopropenoid fatty acids in, 22 dimethylpolysiloxane in; See Dimethylpolysiloxane discard point for, 407–408 for donuts, 405, 416, 417, 419 FFA in, 413, 638–639, 641 filtration of, 637, 639, 641–643 foaming of; See Foaming fryer load and, 639 for grilling, 414–416, 415, 633–634, 637, 641–642 heavy-duty vegetable, 410–411, 413, 413, 634 high-oleic oils for, 36, 412–414, 413 High-Ratio for, 369 household, 440, 443 hydrogenation of, 365, 402, 413 iodine value of, 365, 412, 413, 634 isomerization in, 406, 410 lard for, 348, 421 lecithin and, 414–415, 634, 637 linoleic fatty acid in, 28, 282, 409, 411, 412, 413 linolenic fatty acid in, 412, 413 liquid, 357, 405, 411–412, 412, 413 long-chain fatty acids in, 409, 412 melting point of, 405, 421, 641 methyl silicone and, 632, 633, 635 Mettler dropping point of, 413 monounsaturated fatty acids in, 409 NuSun sunflower oil for, 422 for nuts, 422 oleic fatty acid in, 23, 28, 270, 411, 412, 413 omega-3 fortification for, 408 oxidation in, 233, 256, 400–404, 406–408, 410
689
packaging of, 553 palmitic fatty acid in, 412, 413 palm oil for, 353 for pan frying, 414–416, 415, 633–634, 637, 641–642 peanut oil for, 23, 25, 412, 421, 422 phospholipids and, 637 phosphoric acid and, 404, 421, 638 for pie crusts, 420 plasticity of, 410–411 polymerization in, 400–402, 406, 408, 410, 417, 634–637, 640 polyunsaturated fatty acids in, 633, 634 quality period for, 417 rosemary and, 282 saturated fatty acids in, 409, 411 selection of, 404–408 SFI curve for, 304, 305, 310, 365 SFI profile of appearance, 405 bakery, 416 flavor and, 641 heavy duty, 413 high-oleic sunflower, 413 liquid, 412, 413 lubricity, 405 mouth feel, 405 pan and grill, 415 shelf life of, 406–407 smoke point of, 221, 402, 408, 438, 639 for snacks, 420–422 soybean oil for, 310, 353, 410–412, 415, 415, 421 stability of, 257, 405–406 stearic fatty acid in, 412, 413 for sweet doughs, 419 tallow for, 56, 353, 410 TBHQ and, 403–404, 413 tempering of, 411 tocols in, 403 trans fatty acids in, 274, 406, 408–412, 413 troubleshooting, 633–644 turnover rate bakery, 417 darkening, 637 discussion of, 401–402 FFA and, 638 flavor and, 642 foaming and, 634 forced, 407–408, 634, 637 for snacks, 643 stability and, 406 FT-NIR, 212, 214 Fuel oil, 164
690 Index
Fuller’s earth, 103, 348 Fully hydrogenated hardstocks, 121; See also Stearine Fungal oil, 64, 65, 65–66, 337, 338
G Gadoleic fatty acid in butter, 427 in canola oil, 38, 40, 354, 491 in coconut oil, 49, 427 constants for, 214 in corn oil, 27 in cottonseed oil, 21, 427, 491 in high-oleic safflower oil, 36, 354, 491 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 33, 491 interesterification and, 294 in lard, 54 melting point and, 266 in menhaden oil, 62, 63 in milk fat, 427 in olive oil, 42 omega designation, 266 in palm kernel oil, 51, 427 in peanut oil, 24, 25 in rapeseed oil, 354 in safflower oil, 34, 354 in soybean oil, 18, 427, 491 in sunflower oil, 30, 354 in tallow, 57 Gamma-linolenic acid (GLA), 15, 65, 65, 266, 271, 272 Gardner color scale, 227 Gas/liquid chromatography (GLC), 211, 213–214, 216, 217, 219 Gelatin, 458 Generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status, 37, 60–61, 64, 314, 456, 478 Genetically modified oils (GMO) canola, 39–40, 40, 355 corn, 28 cottonseed, 22 discussion of, 13–15 for high-stability oils, 490–491 omega fatty acids in, 338 palm, 47–48, 50 peanut, 25 soybean, 18–19, 19 trans fatty acids and, 14–15, 337 Geotrichum candidum, 131 Germany, 3, 16, 352
GLA, 15, 65, 65, 266, 271, 272 Glazes, 359, 378–379, 403, 409, 416, 417 GLC, 211, 213–214, 216, 217, 219 Glucosinolates, 37 Gluten, 324, 347 Glyceride analysis, 128, 215 Glycerolysis, 147–148, 149, 586–587 Glycerotride-canoate, 214 Glyceryl lacto palmitate, 372 Glycina maxima; See Soybeans Glycolipids, 45 Gossypium barbadense, 20 Gossypium hirsutum, 20 Gossypol antioxidant activity of, 20 classification of, 8 color from, 12, 20 cooking and, 76 oxidation and, 83, 89, 565 refining for removal of, 13, 20, 80, 83, 89 steaming and, 20 temperature and, 565 toxicity of, 20 uses of, 13 Grape extracts, 282 GRAS, 37, 60–61, 64, 314, 456, 478 Greece, 3 Green Goddess dressing, 489 Grills, 414–416, 415, 633–634, 637, 641–642 Grinding, 76, 187, 188, 359 Gums acetone and, 528 chemical refining and, 83, 88 color of, 570 definition of, 8 frying and, 401, 414, 634–637, 640 in margarine, 458 removal of; See Degumming residual, 528 for salad dressing, 489–490
H Halphen test, 22 Handling air exposure during, 164–165, 190–191 contamination during, 169, 190, 568 for GMOs, 14 ingredient specifications on, 502 light exposure during, 166 Mettler dropping point during, 545
Index
nitrogen for, 164–165, 190–191 packaging specifications on, 504 of recalled products, 513 temperature during, 165, 190 troubleshooting, 600–621 Hard butters, 124, 128, 310–311 Hardfats/stocks bump factors, 328, 332 consistency and, 308 control evaluations for, 534 crystal habit and, 183, 291 fully hydrogenated, 121 hydrogenation for catalysts for, 114, 116 control of, 534 cottonseed oil, 303 isomerization, 290 selectivity, 290, 358 soybean oil, 122, 303 stearines, 121, 290 iodine value of, 534 lard and, 54 low-iodine-value; See Low-iodine-value hardstocks in margarine, 181 melting point of, 185, 534 plasticity and, 306–308, 307 in process flow chart, 75 SFI and, 306–308, 307, 327–328 for shortenings, 177, 178, 373, 377–378, 612 spray cooling of, 187 in spreads, 648 titer test of, 534 Hazelnut oil, 41 HDL; See High-density lipoproteins Health and Human Services and Agriculture, 300 Health claims, 299–300, 456 Heat break test, 529 Heat-stress color test, 530, 531 Heels, product control and, 301 definition of, 119 deodorization and, 594 disposal costs, 520 efficiency and, 120, 301 oxidation and, 166 recycling of, 604 from shipments, 190, 602 Helianthus annuus; See Sunflowers Hematin, 164 Henicosapentaenoic fatty acid, 214 Herring, 338 Hexadecadienoic fatty acid, 56, 62, 214 Hexadecatetraenoic fatty acid, 62, 214
691
Hexadecatrienoic fatty acid, 62, 214 Hexane extractor temperature and, 77 for filter cake oil extraction, 109 in fractionation, 143 for fungal oil extraction, 65 in miscella refining, 78, 87, 94 in winterization, 136–137 High-density lipoproteins (HDL) canola oil and, 478–479 cholesterol and, 11 diet and, 273 hydrogenation and, 532 lauric fatty acid and, 11, 268 myristic fatty acid and, 11 olive oil and, 478 palmitic fatty acid and, 11 peanut oil and, 25 saturated fatty acids and, 11, 274 stearic fatty acid and, 268 trans fatty acids and, 11, 274, 439, 450 unsaturated fatty acids and, 269 High-oleic oils for all-purpose shortening, 367 canola, 491 cholesterol and, 270 flavor and, 270 for frying shortening, 412–413, 413 iodine value of, 278 oxidation and, 63 oxidative stability and, 278, 335 peanut, 25 safflower; See High-oleic safflower oil saturated fatty acids in, 270 sunflower; See High-oleic sunflower oil trans fatty acids in, 270, 337 High-oleic safflower oil, 35–37, 36, 270, 278, 354, 490–491, 491 High-oleic sunflower oil AOM stability of, 32, 413 arachidic fatty acid in, 33, 354, 491 behenic fatty acid in, 33, 354, 491 cold test of, 32 crystal habit of, 33 discussion of, 32 erucic fatty acid in, 33, 491 FFA in, 413 flavor of, 413–414, 413 foaming of, 413 for frying shortening, 413–414, 413 gadoleic fatty acid in, 33, 491 high-stability, 490–491, 491 for high-stability oils, 490 iodine value of, 32, 278, 413, 491
692 Index
lauric fatty acid in, 491 lignoceric fatty acid in, 354 linoleic fatty acid in, 33, 354, 413, 491 linolenic fatty acid in, 32, 33, 413, 491 margaric fatty acid in, 491 melting point of, 32 Mettler dropping point of, 413 myristic fatty acid in, 32, 354, 491 oleic fatty acid in, 32, 33, 270, 354, 413, 491 oxidative stability of, 32, 32, 278, 491 palmitic fatty acid in, 32, 354, 413, 491 palmitoleic fatty acid in, 33, 354, 491 refractive index of, 32 saponification of, 32 SFI profile of, 413 specific gravity of, 32 stearic fatty acid in, 33, 354, 413, 491 TBHQ and, 413 tocopherols in, 32 trans fatty acids in, 413 triglycerides in, 33 unsaponifiable matter in, 32 waxes in, 32 High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), 128, 215–217 High-Ratio shortening, 350, 368–369 High-stability oils, 473, 476, 490–492, 491, 552 HLB system, 320–323 Hogs, 53, 348; See also Swine Hot plate moisture analysis, 198–199 Hot water extraction, 109, 110 Household shortenings, 437–444, 442 HPLC, 128, 215–217 Hydraulic pressing, 78, 141 Hydrochloric acid, 103, 529 Hydrogenation agitation and, 114 AOM and, 279, 580 of basestocks, 120–121, 122, 303, 534 batch, 116–118 black press for, 118 bleaching and, 101, 105, 144, 542, 580–582 blending and, 118 butter and, 105 calcium and, 13, 527 of canola oil, 39, 308 carotenoids and, 542, 544 catalysts for, 111, 114–116, 534 in chemical refining, 91 chlorophyll and, 39, 542 cholesterol and, 532 cis fatty acids and, 111, 278, 459 color and, 535, 536, 542–543 consistency and, 57, 110, 118–119, 289–291
continuous systems for, 118 control of, 118–119, 533–535 of cottonseed oil, 290, 303, 349–350, 442 dead-end system for, 117–118, 117 deodorization and, 155 description of, 110–111 elaidic fatty acid and, 308 equipment used in, 116–118 factors affecting, 113–116 FFA and, 533–535, 536 filtration and, 116, 144, 542 flavor and, 36, 110, 153, 533 for hardfats/stocks; See under Hardfats/ stocks, hydrogenation of for high-stability oils, 490 historical background of, 348–349 hydrolysis and, 118 ingredient statements on, 301 vs. interesterification, 123, 532 iodine value and, 113, 119, 120, 279, 301, 534 isomerization and, 111–116, 274, 289, 578 lard and, 105, 387 linoleic fatty acid and, 112–113, 116, 289, 579 linolenic fatty acid and, 112, 114–116 magnesium and, 13, 527 for margarine, 460–461, 460 melting point and, 114–115, 289, 534, 579 Mettler dropping point and, 119, 534 moisture and, 115, 533–535, 579 odor from, 153 oleic fatty acid and, 112–113, 116, 289 oxidation and, 36 oxidative stability and, 110, 114, 277–279, 279, 281, 306, 365 packaging and, 110 palm oil and, 47 peroxide value and, 533 phosphatides and, 578, 580 phosphorus and, 115, 527, 533, 578, 580 in physical refining, 82, 82 polyunsaturated fatty acids and, 289, 490 pressure and, 113–114, 290, 303, 536 on process flow chart, 75 purpose of, 110, 532 recirculation system for, 117, 118 refractive index and, 119, 534 of safflower oil, 35 for salad oil, 583 saturated fatty acids and, 135, 145, 145, 532 selective, 112–116, 120–121, 308, 365, 533 SFI curves and, 121, 365, 533 of shortenings, 365, 402, 413, 440–441, 442 side effects of, 36 soap and, 533–534, 578
Index
sodium and, 13 of soybean oil; See under Soybean oil, hydrogenation of specifications for, 506 spectrophotometry and, 227 before steaming, 82 stearic fatty acid and, 113, 114, 289, 490, 579 for sterols, 12 sulfur and, 114–115, 531, 578–579 tallow and, 105 temperature and, 113, 290, 303, 536, 579 titer test in, 119, 534 trace metals and, 13, 527 trans fatty acids and, 111–116, 135, 145, 145, 274, 308, 532–533 troubleshooting, 578–580 unsaturated fatty acids and, 111, 301 water washing and, 91 winterization and, 135 Hydrogen gas, 111–118, 120, 122, 125, 204, 534, 578–579 Hydrogen peroxide, 100 Hydrogen sulfide, 115, 534, 578 Hydrolysis canola oil, 37 coconut oil, 50, 280 definition of, 169, 276, 406 degumming and, 84 discussion of, 283 emulsifiers and, 283, 588 FFA and, 221, 283, 607, 628 flavor and, 50, 217, 276, 280 frying and, 233, 406, 638, 640 of glucosinolates, 37 during handling/storage, 169 hydrogenation and, 118 interesterification and, 538 lecithin and, 320 in miscella refining, 94 after oilseed flaking, 563 olive oil, 283 oxidative stability and, 628 palm kernel oil, 280, 283 palm oil, 79, 283 rancidity and, 217 during shipment, 190 of shortening chips, 395 smoke point and, 408 soybean oil, 564 steaming and, 79, 156 vacuum bleaching and, 102 Hydroperoxides, 164, 166, 219 Hydrophilic/lipophilic balance (HLB) system, 320–323
693
I Ice cream bar coating test, 234, 258 emulsifiers for, 151, 317 equipment for freezing, 173 flavor of, 60 Icing consistency of, 377, 378 definition of, 376 dimethylpolysiloxane and, 403 emulsifiers for, 315, 370, 377–378 frying shortening and, 416 mellorine basestock, 296 PGEs and, 318, 378 properties of, 376–377 saturated fatty acids and, 409 shortening for, 209, 377–378, 547, 548, 551 stabilizers; See Icing stabilizers volume test for, 231–232, 244 Icing stabilizers chill roll coolant temperatures, 186 development of, 359 interesterification for, 378 melting point of, 185, 359, 378 Mettler dropping point of, 379 production of, 379 SFI profile of, 359, 379 Identification procedures, 513–515 India, 3, 19, 475 Indonesia, 3 Industrial margarine, 16, 179, 182, 465–466, 469, 556 Infant formula, 339; See also Milk fat, human Ingredient specifications, 499–502 Inspections, 524–527 Interchangeability, 334 Interesterification for acetylation, 150 acid termination, 125–126, 129 applications for, 123–124, 132–133 arachidic fatty acid and, 293, 294 bleaching and, 144–145, 542 vs. blending, 336 of butter, 126 of canola oil, 292, 294, 442 capric fatty acid and, 293, 294 caproic fatty acid and, 293 caprylic fatty acid and, 293 carbon dioxide and, 129, 580 catalysts for, 124–125, 129, 537 of coconut oil, 126, 292, 293, 294, 462 color in, 125, 126, 129, 537
694 Index
consistency and, 291–295 control of, 126–128, 535–538 of corn oil, 295, 464 of cottonseed oil; See under Cottonseed oil, interesterification of crystal habit and; See under Crystal habit, interesterification and crystallization and, 55, 123, 124, 130–132, 291–295, 335–336, 367 for Danish pastry, 391 definition of, 122–123 directed; See Directed interesterification DSC analysis for, 127–128 FFA and, 129, 129, 131–132, 537–538, 580 fiber optic spectrometry and, 126–127 fractionation and, 132, 295 gadoleic fatty acid and, 294 glyceride compositional analysis, 128 for household shortenings, 441–443, 442 vs. hydrogenation, 123, 532 hydrolysis and, 538 iodine value and, 293, 294, 335 isomerization and, 123 of lard; See under Lard, interesterification of lauric fatty acid and, 293, 294 of lauric oils, 123–124, 292 linoleic fatty acid and, 293, 294 linolenic fatty acid and, 294 for margarine, 461–464, 463 melting point and; See under Melting point, interesterification and Mettler dropping point and, 367 moisture and, 125, 129, 129, 537–538, 580 monitoring of, 126–128 myristic fatty acid and, 293, 294 neutralization after, 125, 129, 144, 538 oleic fatty acid and, 293, 294 oxidation and, 278–279 oxidative stability and, 127, 442, 628 palmitic fatty acid and, 293, 294 of palm kernel oil, 127, 127–128, 128 of palm oil, 47, 126, 292, 293, 294, 366 of peanut oil, 336, 367 peroxide and, 129, 537, 580 in physical refining, 82 on process flow chart, 75 purpose of, 532 quality guidelines, 129 random; See Random interesterification separation processes for, 581 SFC and, 293, 335 SFI and, 127, 128, 292, 335, 535 for shortenings, 366–367 silica in, 538
soap and, 125, 129–131, 129, 537–538, 580 of soybean oil, 126, 292, 294, 336 stearic fatty acid and, 293, 294 storage and, 629 of tallow, 126 tocols and, 127, 279, 538 trans fatty acids and, 124, 131, 133, 293, 335–336, 367 trisaturates in directed, 130–131, 295, 464 melting point and, 126 random, 463 SFI and, 127 soybean blends, 294 withdrawal of, 367 troubleshooting, 580–581 water termination, 125, 126, 129 Invisible sources, 6 Iodine value of algal oil, 65 as analytical tool, 211–212 AOCS on, 212, 620 AOM and, 279, 651 of basestocks, 534 blending and, 327 of butter, 427 calculated, 214–215 of canola oil, 37, 40, 278, 484, 491 of coconut oil, 49, 278, 427 of corn oil, 26, 278, 484, 542 of cottonseed oil; See under Cottonseed oil, iodine value of definition of, 211, 484 dewaxing and, 541 for diglycerides, 381 of fat flakes, 620–621 FFA and, 651 fractionation and, 296, 297 of fungal oil, 66 glyceride functionality and, 315 of hardfats/stocks, 534 of high-oleic safflower oil, 36, 278, 491 of high-oleic sunflower oil, 32, 278, 413, 491 hydrogenation and, 113, 119, 120, 279, 301, 534 interesterification and, 293, 294, 335, 463 of lard, 53, 278 long-chain fatty acids and, 309 of margarine, 308, 458 melting point and, 119 of menhaden oil, 61, 63, 278 of milk fat, 59, 278 for monoglycerides, 381
Index
of NuSun sunflower oil, 31, 278 olein range, 47 of olive oil, 41, 278 oxidative stability and, 277, 306, 308, 365 of palm kernel oil, 51, 52, 278, 297, 427 of palm oil, 44, 46, 47, 48, 278, 297 of peanut oil, 24, 278 polyunsaturated fatty acids and, 634 raw material analysis of, 526 refractive index and, 119, 212, 213, 534 of safflower oil, 34, 278 of salad oil, 484, 484 of shortenings all-purpose, 365, 366, 370, 545 cake, 547, 548, 551 chips, 620–621 frying, 365, 412, 413, 634 household, 442 icing, 547, 548, 551 liquid, 553 liquid cake, 375 of soybean oil; See under Soybean oil, iodine value of of spreads, 308 of stearin, 47 of stearine, 144 of sunflower oil, 29, 278, 484 of tallow, 56, 278, 297 temperature and, 123 trans fatty acids and, 213, 274, 309 winterization and, 135 Ireland, 3 Iron analysis for, 201 BHT and, 168, 282 bleaching and, 83, 629 in canola oil, 87 classification of, 13 degumming and, 83, 86–87 deodorization and, 160 emulsifiers and, 585–586, 608 flavor and, 626 frying and, 404 magnetic removal of, 74–76 in menhaden oil, 62 oxidative stability and, 13, 627 in palm oil, 47 phosphoric acid and, 88 propyl gallate and, 167, 281 in rail tank cars, 190 in soybean oil, 16, 87, 565 in sunflower oil, 87 TBHQ and, 168, 282 water washing and, 91
695
Isomerization bleaching and, 103, 104, 106–107 cis fatty acids and, 273 definition of, 406 during deodorization, 274, 589–590 hydrogenation and, 111–116, 274, 289, 578 interesterification and, 123, 133 melting point and, 111 oxidation and, 406 polyunsaturated fatty acids and, 406, 533 rate of, 533 temperature and, 125, 155, 533, 578 of unsaturated fatty acids, 273–274 Isomers, 273 Isopropyl citrate, 455 Israel, 3, 40 Italian dressing, 489 Italy, 3 Ivory Coast, 3
J Japan, 3, 60 Jordan, 3
K Karl Fisher volumetric method, 199 Kerosene, 200 Ketones, 105, 153–154, 166, 454 Kraft bags, 615
L Labels analysis for, 197 antioxidants listed on, 216 approval procedure, 520–521 blending and, 351, 588–589 CFRs on, 298–300 CLA and, 58, 274 design of, 521 Fair Packaging and Labeling Act, 520 health claims on, 299–300, 456 on household shortenings, 439 on margarine, 448, 450–451, 456
696 Index
NLEA; See Nutritional Labeling and Education Act package ingredient statement, 300–301 for shortening, 521 statements on, 297 total fat content on, 214 trans fatty acids on, 58, 274, 298, 334, 353 USDA on, 298 Lactic acid, 148, 316 Lactoglycerides, 148–150, 316, 318, 322, 323, 324, 374 Lactones, 50, 58, 60, 454–455 Lactylic stearate, 380 Lanosterol, 10 Lard antioxidants for, 54, 167 AOM stability of, 53, 580 arachidic fatty acid in, 54 arachidonic fatty acid in, 270, 338 in basestocks, 55 behenic fatty acid in, 54 BHA and, 54 BHT and, 54 bleaching of, 55, 103, 531–532 blending of, 55 capric fatty acid in, 53 characteristics of, 53–55 Chinese green tea extract and, 282 cholesterol in, 9, 366, 388 color of, 12, 348, 566 consistency of, 54–55, 209, 348, 349, 387, 527, 611 consumption of, 6 cottonseed oil and, 19–20, 348–350, 352, 438 crystal habit of, 54, 287 discussion of, 54–55 interesterification and, 45, 124, 268, 287, 367 palmitic fatty acid and, 215, 268, 287 pie crust, 388 crystallization of, 55, 128 deodorization of, 55, 527 in diet, 4 discussion of, 52–55 eicosadienoic fatty acid in, 54 eiosatetraenoic fatty acid in, 54 emulsifiers from, 151, 317 factors affecting, 53 FFA in, 55, 566 filtration of, 55, 527 flavor of, 153, 280, 566, 624 fractionation of, 142, 464 gadoleic fatty acid in, 54 historical background of, 347–354, 437–438
hydrogenation and, 105, 387 interesterification of appearance of, 123–124 for baking, 353 crystal habit, 45, 124, 268, 287, 367 endpoint of, 128 melting point, 126, 127 palmitic fatty acid, 55 purpose of, 352 SFI curves, 128 SFI profile of, 127 iodine value of, 53, 278 lauric fatty acid in, 53 linoleic fatty acid in, 53, 270 linolenic fatty acid in, 54 margaric fatty acid in, 53 for margarine, 646 margaroleic fatty acid in, 53 melting point of, 126, 127 Mettler dropping point of, 53 milk and, 55 myristic fatty acid in, 53, 268 myristoleic fatty acid in, 53 oleic fatty acid in, 53, 270 oxidative stability of, 53, 54, 277, 278 palmitic fatty acid in, 53, 55, 215, 268, 287 palmitoleic fatty acid in, 53 palm oil and, 45 pentadecanoic fatty acid in, 53 phosphatides in, 9 physical refining of, 529 plasticity of, 52–55, 124, 348, 437 polyunsaturated fatty acids in, 54, 270 prime steam, 79, 379 rancidity of, 54 refining of, 55, 80 refractive index of, 53 rendering of, 52, 55, 79, 566 saponification number of, 53 saturated fatty acids in, 388 SFI profile of, 54, 127, 128, 388 for shortenings all-purpose, 365–367, 409 bread, 348, 379 cake, 348 cholesterol and, 366 consistency, 349, 387 cookies, 348 crackers, 395 crème fillings, 378 frying, 54, 421, 443 historical, 347–354, 437–438 household, 437–438, 443 icing, 378
Index
interesterification and, 352–354 pie crust, 54, 387, 388 stripped, 366 sweet doughs, 383 trans fatty acids and, 367 U.S. usage, 352 yeast-raised dough, 54, 383 solidification point, 53 source of, 2, 52 soybean oil and, 17, 18 specific gravity of, 53 steaming of, 55, 79, 566 stearic fatty acid in, 53 sterols in, 9 stripped, 335 structure of, 54, 55 tempering of, 387, 611 titer test of, 53, 207 tocols in, 9, 53 trace metals and, 160 trans fatty acids in, 367, 388 triglyceride composition of, 54, 268 unsaponifiable matter in, 9, 53 uses of, 54 water washing of, 55 Lauric fatty acid in algal oil, 64 availability of, 267 in butter, 427 in canola oil, 14, 40, 491 cholesterol and, 11, 268 classification of, 7, 267 in coconut oil, 48, 52, 221, 267–268, 427 in cottonseed oil, 427, 491 FFA and, 221 flavor and, 52, 625 in high-oleic safflower oil, 36, 491 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 491 interesterification and, 293, 294 iodine value and, 119 in lard, 53 melting point and, 266 in milk, 59 odor of, 52 in palm kernel oil, 50, 51, 52, 221, 267–268, 427 in palm oil, 44 positioning of, 7 refractive index and, 119 sources of, 267 in soybean oil, 427, 491 steaming and, 82 in tallow, 56
697
Lauric oils vs. butterfat, 58 CBRs from, 143 for cheese, 432 chemical refining of, 96, 571 coconut; See Coconut oil for cookie fillers, 52, 353 flavor of, 52, 641 foaming and, 415, 633 fractionation of, 142, 144, 296 for frying, 353, 415, 633, 634 interesterification of, 123–124, 292 liquid oils and, 626–627 for margarine, 464–465 melting point of, 48, 52 odor of, 52 oxidation of, 52, 641 palm kernel; See Palm kernel oil pH for, 528 physical refining of, 80, 82 refining efficiency of, 98 saponification value of, 211 saturated fatty acids in, 52 SFI profile of, 308, 335 for shortening chips, 395 steaming of, 82 trans fatty acids and, 335 uses of, 52 wet-method batch refining for, 96 Lauroleic fatty acid, 59, 214 LDL cholesterol; See Low-density lipoproteins LEAR oil, 37; See also Canola oil Lebanon, 3 Lecithin; See also Ascorbyl palmitate acid degumming and, 9, 85, 100, 570 antioxidant activity of, 320 applications for, 319–320 bleaching of, 100 for cakes, 319, 632 color of, 227, 320 deodorization and, 161 in eggs, 485, 637 enzymatic degumming and, 87 flaking and, 617–618, 621 flavor of, 100, 320 functionality of, 323, 324 grades of, 100 heat sensitivity and, 626 HLB value of, 322 hydrolysis and, 320 for margarine, 319, 414, 454, 455, 458, 482, 558 odor of, 320, 626 oxalic acid and, 100
698 Index
peroxide and, 282 phosphoric acid and, 100 production of, 100 for salad dressing, 487, 489 for shortenings cake mix, 372 discussion of, 319 donuts, 418, 419 frying, 414–415, 634, 637 icing, 378 liquid, 550 puff paste, 393 yeast-raised dough, 380 from soybean oil, 83, 100, 319 for spreads, 319 in Unilever process, 85 water degumming and, 9, 84, 85, 100 Libya, 3 Light exposure chlorophyll and, 144 flavor and, 166, 189, 596, 603–604, 626 during handling, 166 olive oil and, 43 oxidation and, 164, 189, 481, 628 during packaging/storage, 166, 481 peroxide value and, 593, 606 Lignoceric fatty acid in canola oil, 38, 40, 354 classification of, 7, 268 in cottonseed oil, 21 in fungal oil, 66 in high-oleic safflower oil, 36, 354 melting point and, 266 in olive oil, 42 in peanut oil, 24, 268 positioning of, 7 in soybean oil, 18 in sunflower oil, 30 Linoleic fatty acid in algal oil, 65 in basestocks, 120 in butter, 427 in canola oil, 38, 39, 40, 338, 354, 491 classification of, 7, 270 in coconut oil, 49, 427 conjugated, 55, 58, 274–275 constants for, 214 in corn oil, 26–28, 27, 338, 478 in cottonseed oil; See under Cottonseed oil, linoleic fatty acid in in diet, 272, 337, 476 fermentation with, 275 flavor and, 14, 28, 57, 281, 595 in frying shortening, 28, 409, 411, 412, 413
in fungal oil, 65 health and, 34–35, 476 in high-oleic safflower oil, 35, 36, 354, 491 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 33, 354, 413, 491 hydrogenation and, 112–113, 116, 289, 579 interesterification and, 293, 294 isomerization of, 273, 274, 406, 485 in lard, 53 melting point and, 112, 116, 266, 284 in menhaden oil, 62, 63 metabolism of, 272 methylene groups, 276 in milk fat, 59 in Nucoa margarine, 449 in NuSun sunflower oil, 31 in olive oil, 42, 42 omega designation, 266, 271 oxidation and, 164 oxidation of, 36 oxidative stability and, 276 in palm kernel oil, 51, 427 in palm oil, 44, 46 in peanut oil, 24, 25, 338 positioning of, 7, 112 in rapeseed oil, 39, 354 reduction to oleic, 112–113 relative reactivity of, 116 in safflower oil, 33–35, 34, 338, 354 sources of, 15, 272 in soybean oil; See under Soybean oil, linoleic fatty acid in in sunflower oil, 29, 30, 30, 338, 354 in tallow, 56 Linoleladic fatty acid, 266 Linolenic fatty acid in basestocks, 120 in butter, 427 in canola oil; See under Canola oil, linolenic fatty acid in CLA and, 275 classification of, 7, 270 in coconut oil, 427 constants for, 214 in corn oil, 27, 27, 478 in cottonseed oil, 16, 21, 138, 290, 303, 427, 491 DHA, conversion to, 337 in diet, 271, 272, 337 Dietary Guidelines for Americans on, 300 EPA, conversion to, 15, 337 flavor and, 16, 57, 138, 281, 595 in frying shortening, 412, 413 in fungal oil, 65, 65 in fungus, 65
Index
gamma; See Gamma-linolenic acid health and, 38, 271 in high-oleic safflower oil, 36, 354, 491 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 32, 33, 413, 491 hydrogenation of, 112, 114–116 interesterification and, 294 isomerization of, 273, 274, 406 in lard, 54 in linseed oil, 338 in margarine, 451 melting point and, 112, 116, 266 in menhaden oil, 62 metabolism of, 271, 272 methylene groups, 277 in milk fat, 59 nematodes and, 15 in NuSun sunflower oil, 31 in olive oil, 42 omega designation, 266, 271 oxidation of, 164, 277, 406 oxidative stability and, 272 in palm kernel oil, 427 in palm oil, 45 in peanut oil, 24, 25 positioning of, 7, 112 in rapeseed oil, 39, 354 reduction to linoleic, 112 relative reactivity of, 116 in safflower oil, 15, 33, 34, 354 salad oil and, 138 shelf life and, 120 sources of, 15, 271 in soybean oil; See under Soybean oil, linolenic fatty acid in in sunflower oil, 29, 30, 354 in tallow, 57, 57 zebra fish and, 15 Linolenic trans fatty acid, 55, 58 Linseed oil, 15, 337, 338, 625 Lipoproteins cholesterol and, 11 high-density; See High-density lipoproteins low-density; See Low-density lipoproteins very low-density, 11 Lipoxygenase, 16, 76, 563 Liquid coffee whiteners, 426–428 Liquid margarine blending of, 327–328, 327, 329 cottonseed oil for, 461 crystal habit of, 310, 312, 461, 469 formulations for, 311–312 introduction of, 450 Mettler dropping point of, 466 plasticization of, 172, 181
699
preparation of, 469, 647–648 safflower oil for, 35 SFI and, 304, 312, 466 soybean oil for, 461 storage of, 181 tempering of, 181, 461 Liquid oils blending of, 479, 480 characteristics of, 473 clarifying of, 605 coconut oil and, 626–627 control points for, 554 cooking; See Cooking oils crystal structure of, 492 development of, 474–476 for frying, 476 high-stability, 473, 476, 490–492, 491, 552 household, 479–481 industrial, 481–482 interesterification and, 535 lauric oils and, 626–627 light exposure and, 481 margarine; See Margarine oil in mayonnaise; See Mayonnaise oxidative stability of, 490 packaging of, 480–481, 554 salad; See Salad oil in salad dressing; See Salad dressing Liquid shortening additives for, 550, 553 air exposure of, 611–614 applications for, 357–358, 363 blending of, 327–328, 327, 329 for bread, 312, 363, 381–383 bulk form for, 355, 358 for cakes, 363, 374–376, 375 cholesterol in, 435 color of, 553, 613 consistency of, 548, 611–613 control points for, 550–552 crystal habit of aeration and, 357 cake, 374 vs. margarine, 312 packaging, 550 stability, 334 viscosity, 177, 357–358, 612 crystallization of, 176–177, 357–358, 374, 553, 612–614 deaeration process for, 550 description of, 355, 357 development of, 351 emulsifiers in, 177, 374, 550 FFA in, 553
700 Index
flavor of, 553, 613 formulations for, 311–312 iodine value of, 553 methyl silicone in, 553 Mettler dropping point of, 382, 550, 553 for milk analogs, 434 moisture in, 553 monounsaturated fatty acids in, 435 for nondairy creamers, 428 for nut roasting, 422 oxidative stability of, 176–177 packaging of, 550–552 peroxide value of, 553, 613 polyunsaturated fatty acids in, 435 saturated fatty acids in, 435, 553 SFI and, 304, 312 storage of, 553 suspension stability of, 550 TBHQ for, 375, 382, 553 temperature and, 612 tempering of, 357, 358, 553 trans fatty acids in, 435, 553 troubleshooting, 611–614 uniformity in, 363 viscosity of, 374, 550, 553 Listeria, 645 Long-chain fatty acids from algae, 64 crystal habit and, 291 flavor and, 220, 338 in frying shortening, 409 from fungus, 65 in glycerides, 150 GMOs and, 15 hydrolysis and, 283 interesterification and, 131 iodine value and, 309 isomerization rate for, 533 limit of, 61 in liquid oil, 473 in marine oils, 61–62, 64, 270 in menhaden oil, 61–62 in peanut oil, 25 positioning of, 268 saturated, 268–269 sterols and, 12 unsaturated, 269–270 Lovibond Color Method in AOCS methods, 225, 226 bleaching and, 530, 531, 543–544, 543 canola oil and, 484, 565 cloudiness and, 619 coconut oil and, 50 corn oil and, 484
cottonseed oil and, 484 deodorization and, 593 description of, 226 dewaxing and, 542 hydrogenation and, 536 of salad oil, 484, 484 of shortenings all-purpose, 545 cake, 547, 548, 551 icing, 547, 548, 551 soybean oil and, 17, 484 sunflower oil and, 484 tallow and, 226, 530 use of, 608–609 winterization and, 541 yellow additives and, 227 Low-density lipoproteins (LDL) canola oil and, 478–479 DHA/EPA and, 300 Dietary Guidelines for Americans on, 300 factors affecting, 11 fish oil omega fatty acids and, 61 hydrogenation and, 532 lauric fatty acid and, 11 myristic fatty acid and, 11 oleic fatty acid and, 38, 270 olive oil and, 478 omega-3 fatty acids and, 273, 300, 476 palmitic fatty acid and, 11, 268 peanut oil and, 23, 25 saturated fatty acids and, 11, 267 stanols and, 12 stearic fatty acid and, 268 sterols and, 10–12 trans fatty acids and, 11, 274, 439, 450 unsaturated fatty acids and, 269 Low erucic acid rapeseed oil (LEAR oil), 37 Low-iodine-value hardstocks chill roll coolant temperatures, 186 crystal habit and, 18, 177, 183 crystallization of, 612 description of, 121 grinding of, 188 hydrogenation catalyst for, 121 hydrogenation for, 116, 290, 358, 534 lactoglycerides from, 148 for margarine, 462 melting point of, 185 pressure and, 121 production of, 580 refractive indices for, 119 SFI profile of, 328 for shortenings all-purpose, 305–306, 361
Index
701
crème fillings, 377–378 household, 441 icing, 377–378 liquid, 312 liquid bread, 382 pie crust, 387 puff paste, 393 sweet doughs, 383 temperature and, 121 titer test for, 119, 207 trans fatty acids and, 358–359 Low-temperature wet rendering, 79 Lubricity, 54, 123, 284, 302, 304, 312, 405 Lutelin, 23 Luxembourg, 3 Lysophosphatidic acid, 8 Lysophospholipids, 86
M Mackerel, 338 Magnesium bleaching and, 13 degumming and, 13, 85 in detergent fractionation, 142–143 hydrogenation and, 13, 527 montmorillonite and, 103 phosphoric acid and, 88 refining and, 13, 527 water washing and, 91, 574 Malaysia, 3, 47, 50 Maleic acid, 83 Malic acid, 487, 489 Malvalic fatty acid, 22 Manganese, 13, 160, 404, 627 Margaric fatty acid in butter, 427 in canola oil, 491 in coconut oil, 427 in cottonseed oil, 427, 491 in high-oleic safflower oil, 491 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 491 in lard, 53 melting point and, 266 in menhaden oil, 62 in milk fat, 59 in olive oil, 42 in palm kernel oil, 427 in soybean oil, 17, 427, 491 in tallow, 56
Margarine all-purpose, 305–306 animal fats for, 451, 451 appearance rating, 240, 241, 558 bacteria in, 644–645 baker’s; See Baker’s margarine/shortening canola oil for, 647 characteristics of, 310, 456, 457 clarifying of, 414 classification of, 425 coconut oil for, 448–449, 464–465 coliforms in, 558, 644 color of, 459, 646 consistency of; See under Consistency, of margarine consumption of, 7, 452, 452 control points for, 557 corn oil for, 450, 451, 451 cottonseed oil for, 449, 451, 460, 461 creaming gas for, 172, 174, 181 crystal habit of; See under Crystal habit, of margarine crystallization of, 172, 174, 179–182, 468, 469, 609–610 curd in, 558 for Danish pastry, 146, 182, 314, 391, 466 definition of, 453 description of, 347 development of, 447–453 DHA in, 450, 456 diet, 450 emulsifiers for, 178–179, 315, 318, 454, 458, 558, 645 EPA in, 450, 456 equipment for, 174, 177–181 fat content of, 447, 557, 558 FDA on, 60, 449, 453, 456 FFA in, 558 flavor of, 174, 450, 454–455, 558, 648–649 formulations for, 451, 453–457 fractionation for, 464 for frying, 414, 453 gums in, 458 health claims on, 456 household, 459–465, 460, 466, 466, 556 industrial, 16, 179, 182, 465–466, 469, 556 interesterification for, 461–464, 463 iodine value of, 308, 458 lard for, 646 lauric oils for, 464–465 lecithin for, 319, 414, 454, 455, 458, 482, 558 linolenic fatty acid in, 451 liquid; See Liquid margarine liquidity zones, 304
702 Index
low-fat spreads, 452–453, 457–459 marine oils in, 450 Mettler dropping point of, 466, 558 milk in, 453–454, 467 moisture in, 558 mold in, 558, 645 mouth feel of, 172, 454, 457, 648 oil; See Margarine oil omega fatty acids in, 339, 450, 456 oxidative stability of, 339 packaging of; See under Packaging, of margarine palm kernel oil for, 464–465 palm oil for, 43, 450, 456, 462, 464, 646–647 pathogens in, 645 penetration test of, 558 peroxide value of, 558 PGEs and, 318 plasticization of, 172, 177–182, 179, 467–468 polyunsaturated fatty acids in, 451 preparation of, 466–469, 557, 558 preservatives in, 455, 458 proteins in, 453–454 for puff paste, 146, 182, 314 roll-in; See Roll-in margarine/shortening safflower oil for, 450, 451, 451 salt in, 558 saturated fatty acids in, 460, 558 SFI curves for, 304, 305, 306, 308 SFI profile of baker’s, 391, 466 characteristics and, 457 Danish pastry, 391, 466 household, 466 liquid, 466 measurement points, 205, 326, 456–457 soft tub, 458, 460 stick, 458, 460 shipment of, 189 soft tub; See Soft-tub margarine soybean oil for; See under Soybean oil, margarine for spattering by, 319 vs. spreads, 557 standard of identity for, 60, 449, 450, 453, 556 sterols/stanols in, 12 stick; See Stick margarine storage of, 181, 558, 646, 648–649 tempering of, 179, 181–185, 461, 558 tests for; See Performance tests tocols in, 455 trace metals in, 455 trans fatty acids in, 451, 460, 558 troubleshooting, 644–649
usage of, 451 USDA on, 449, 453, 556 U.S. laws against, 448 vitamins in, 339, 449, 453, 455–456, 557, 558 whipped tub, 172, 181, 450, 469 yeast in, 558, 645 Margarine Act, 449 Margarine oil basestocks for, 120 characteristics of, 310 crystal habit of, 312 discussion of, 456–457 emulsifiers and, 178–179 formulations for baker’s, 466 blends, 310 household, 459–465, 460 liquid, 181 low trans fat, 334 oleo in, 448 polyunsaturates in, 339 roll-in, 466 soft tub, 180 lauric oils for, 464–465 lecithin in, 414 melting point of, 648 SFI curves, 304, 310, 648 SFI profile of, 205, 457, 458 specifications for, 558 Margaroleic fatty acid, 53, 56, 214, 266 Marine oils BHA/BHT and, 627 characteristics of, 7–8, 265 Chinese green tea extract and, 282, 627 erucic fatty acid in, 62, 63, 270 FDA on, 60–61 from fish; See Fish oil long-chain fatty acids in, 61–62, 64, 270 in margarine, 450 from microalgae, 64, 64–65, 337, 338 saturated fatty acids in, 267 structure of, 7–8, 126, 265 unsaturated fatty acids in, 269–270 whale oil, 348, 349 Market withdrawal, 513 Mayonnaise canola oil for, 483 cold test of oil for, 208, 326 corn oil for, 478, 483 cottonseed oil for, 30, 133, 138, 483 ingredients in, 482–486 processing of, 486–487 safflower oil for, 35, 483 salad oil for, 133, 474, 482–485
Index
soybean oil for, 16, 483 standard of identity for, 482–483 sunflower oil for, 30, 483 waxes and, 30 MCTs, 50, 143 Meat fats from; See Chicken fat; Lard; Tallow frying of, 400 nutritional labeling on, 298 omega fatty acids in, 339 trans fatty acids in, 273–274 Meat Inspection Act, 167, 281 Medium-chain fatty acids in butter, 267 in butterfat, 58 cholesterol and, 11, 267, 268 in coconut oil, 267–268 deodorization and, 589 hydrolysis and, 283 metabolism of, 267 in palm kernel oil, 52, 267–268 positioning of, 11, 267 saturated, 267–268 Medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs), 50, 143 Megè-Mouriès, Hippolyte, 447–448 Mellorine churn-out of, 433 classification of, 425 cottonseed stearin for, 296 definition of, 432 emulsifiers for, 151, 317, 433 fat content of, 433 forms of, 432–433 lauric oils for, 368 palm stearin for, 296, 368 production of, 433 shortenings for, 355, 433 Melting point of acetic fatty acid, 266 analysis of, 202–203 AOCS on, 177, 202–203 arachidic fatty acid and, 266 behenic fatty acid and, 266 of butter, 126 butyric fatty acid and, 266 of canola oil, 37 capillary, 202 caproic fatty acid and, 266 caprylic fatty acid and, 266 cis fatty acids and, 111, 266, 274 clupanodonic fatty acid and, 266 of coconut oil, 48, 126, 127, 267–268 of corn oil, 26, 26, 27 of cottonseed oil, 21, 126, 127, 183, 336
703
definition of, 202 DHA and, 266 dihomo-gamma-linolenic fatty acid and, 266 elaidic fatty acid and, 112, 266 eleostearic fatty acid and, 266 of emulsifiers, 185 EPA and, 266 erucic fatty acid and, 266 of fat flakes, 185 fractionation and, 141, 295, 296, 297 of frying shortening, 405, 421, 641 gadoleic fatty acid and, 266 of hardfats/stocks, 185, 534 of high-oleic safflower oil, 36 of high-oleic sunflower oil, 32 hydrogenation and, 114–115, 289, 534, 579 interesterification and canola oil, 294 coconut oil, 294 cottonseed oil, 127, 294 directed, 295 discussion of, 126 lard, 127 palm kernel, 127 palm oil, 127, 294, 463 random, 292, 536 soybean oil, 127, 294, 463 tallow, 127 iodine value and, 119 isomerization and, 111 of lard, 127 lauric fatty acid and, 48, 52, 266 lignoceric fatty acid and, 266 linoleic fatty acid and, 112, 116, 266, 284 linolenic fatty acid and, 112, 116, 266 liquidity zones, 284 margaric fatty acid and, 266 of margarine oil, 648 margaroleic fatty acid and, 266 of menhaden oil, 62 myristic fatty acid and, 266 myristoleic fatty acid and, 266 of NuSun sunflower oil, 31 oleic fatty acid and, 112, 116, 266, 284 of olive oil, 42 omega fatty acids and, 266 oxidative stability and, 206 palmitelaidic fatty acid and, 266 palmitic fatty acid and, 266, 284 palmitoleic fatty acid and, 266 of palm kernel oil, 50, 52, 127, 267–268 of palm oil, 126, 127, 183, 297 of peanut oil, 23, 24 pentadecanoic fatty acid and, 266
704 Index
petroselinic fatty acid and, 112, 266 plasticity and, 308 of polyunsaturated fatty acids, 490 of safflower oil, 34 saturated fatty acids and, 111, 265–268 SFI and, 206, 651 of shortening chips, 185, 358, 394–395 of soybean oil, 17, 126, 127, 183, 297 stearic fatty acid and, 112, 266, 284 stearidonic fatty acid and, 266 of sunflower oil, 29 of tallow, 126, 127, 183 trans fatty acids and, 111, 266, 274 triglyceride composition and, 284, 291 unsaturated fatty acids and, 111, 269 vaccenic fatty acid and, 266 Wiley, 203 Membrane filter degumming, 87–88 Menhaden fish, 61 Menhaden oil bleaching of, 61 blending of, 63 canola oil and, 62 cholesterol in, 62 cold test of, 62, 63 crystal habit of, 287 degumming of, 61 deodorization of, 61 fatty acids in, 61–63, 62, 63, 338 FDA on, 60–61 flavor of, 61, 280 fractionation of, 63, 63 GRAS status of, 60–61 iodine value of, 61, 63, 278 melting point of, 62 oxidation of, 277 oxidative stability of, 278 refining of, 61 refractive index of, 61 saponification number of, 61 soybean oil and, 62 specific gravity of, 61 structure of, 63 titer test of, 62 trace metals in, 62 unsaponifiable matter in, 61, 61 unsaturated fatty acids in, 62, 63 winterization of, 61, 63 Merrill system, 159 Methane, 534, 578 Methanol, 132 Methylcellulose, 458 Methyl silicone, 552, 553, 632, 633, 635
Mettler dropping point accuracy of, 544 analysis of, 203 AOCS on, 203, 534, 605 of butter, 427, 466 of coconut oil, 49, 386, 427 of cottonseed oil, 290, 303, 427, 537 description of, 119 emulsifiers and, 605 during handling/shipment, 545 of high-oleic sunflower oil, 413 hydrogenation and, 119, 534 of icing stabilizers, 379 interesterification and, 367 of lard, 53, 388 of margarine, 391, 458, 466, 558 of milk, 59 of palm kernel oil, 51, 297, 427 of palm oil, 44 of shortenings all-purpose, 545 baker’s, 391, 466 cake, 547, 548, 551 cookie filler, 386 crackers, 396 frying, 413 household, 442 icing, 547, 548, 551 liquid, 550, 553 liquid bread, 382 pie crust, 388 puff paste, 393 of soybean oil, see under Soybean oil, Mettler dropping point of of tallow, 56, 297 troubleshooting, 605 Mettler dropping point of Soybean oil, 122 Mexico, 3 Microalgae oils, 64, 64–65, 337, 338 Microwaves, 185, 373 Milk for margarine, 453–454, 458, 467, 470, 557, 558, 649 for spreads, 557, 645 Milk analogs, 434, 435 Milk fat, cow’s AOM stability of, 59 blending of, 60 in butter, 58 butterfat; See Butterfat butter oil, 58 carotene in, 58 characteristics of, 58–60
Index
consistency of, 60 crystal habit of, 59, 60, 287 for Danish pastry, 60 environment and, 2 factors affecting, 58 fatty acids in, 55, 58, 59, 267, 268, 274, 427 flavor of, 58, 60 fractionation of, 60 iodine value of, 59, 278, 427 Mettler dropping point of, 59, 427 odor of, 60 oxidative stability of, 59, 277, 278 palmitic fatty acid in, 59 refractive index of, 58, 59 saponification number of, 58, 59 SFI profile of, 59, 427 solidification point, 59 specific gravity of, 59 steaming of, 58 structure of, 58 titer test of, 59 unsaponifiable matter in, 58, 59 Milk fat, human, 55, 65, 339 Mineral oil, 492 Miscella refining, 78, 87, 92–94, 565 Mixed triglycerides, 7–8, 123, 215 Mixes, prepared cake; See Cake mix shortenings for cakes, 371–373 donuts, 418 powdered, 359 specialty cakes, 373–374 troubleshooting, 632 tests for, 233, 251–252 for yeast-raised dough, 318 Modification; See Interesterification Moisture in acid oil, 99 analysis of, 198–199, 221 in animal fats, 527 in bleaching earths, 104, 107–108 in corn oil, 542 in cottonseed oil, 537, 541, 555 emulsifiers and, 313, 316 fatty acid cleavage by; See Hydrolysis flaking and, 616 flavor and, 198 frying and, 399–401 from handling/storage, 169 hydrogenation and, 115, 533–535, 579 in icing, 318, 376 interesterification and, 125, 129, 129, 537–538, 580
705
lauric oils and, 52 in lecithin, 100 in margarine, 455, 558 in nuts, 422 in olives, 41 oxidation and, 628 in palm oil, 79 plasticization and, 177 in puff pastry, 233 rendering and, 79 residual, 528 from shipment, 190 in shortenings cake, 547, 548, 551 crème fillings, 318, 376 household, 440 icing, 547, 548, 551 liquid, 553 troubleshooting, 609, 632 in silica, 96, 105 in soybean oil, 529, 531, 536, 543, 556 spattering and, 319 in tallow, 530 vacuum drying and, 91, 130 water activity and, 376 Mold bleaching and, 23 chemical refining and, 23 cooking and, 76 in margarine, 645 margarine quality standards on, 558 odor of, 625 on peanuts, 23, 564 sorbic acid and, 455 troubleshooting, 564 Molded print system, 180, 468 Molecular distillation, 11, 148, 150 Monel metal, 636 Monoacid triglycerides, 7 Monoglycerides alcoholysis of, 146 analysis of, 215–216, 221 AOCS on, 216 applications for, 146, 314 concentration levels, 314 deodorization and, 161 direct esterification of, 146 discussion of, 146–148, 314–316 ethoxylated, 150, 380, 383 forms of, 147, 314 frying and, 406 functionality of, 315, 323 GRAS status of, 314 grinding of, 188
706 Index
heat and, 148 HLB value of, 320–321, 321 hydrolysis and, 283 in interesterification, 125, 538, 580 iodine value for, 381 in margarine, 454, 458, 558 for milk analogs, 434 molecular distillation of, 148 mouth feel of, 625 oxidation and, 628 PGMEs and, 152, 324 process flow chart for, 149 in shortenings all-purpose, 368–370 bread, 146, 150, 314, 379–383 cake, 547, 548, 551 cake mix, 371–372 crème fillings, 377–378 Danish pastry, 146, 314 donuts, 418 household, 438, 440 icing, 377–378, 547, 548, 551 liquid, 374 liquid bread, 382 mellorine, 433 puff paste, 393 sweet doughs, 383 whipped toppings, 431 yeast-raised doughs, 380 in spreads, 648 structure of, 146, 314 succinylation of, 150 temperature and, 586 types of, 146–147 Monosaturated triglycerides (SUU) in canola oil, 38 in coconut oil, 49 in corn oil, 27 in cottonseed oil, 21 in high-oleic safflower oil, 36 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 33 in interesterification, 291 in lard, 54, 54 melting point of, 284 in NuSun sunflower oil, 31 in olive oil, 42 in palm oil, 45, 46 in peanut oil, 24 in safflower oil, 34 in soybean oil, 18 in sunflower oil, 30 in tallow, 57 in winterization, 135 Monosodium glutamate, 483, 487, 489
Monounsaturated fatty acids in butterfat, 435 in canola oil, 38, 480, 484 cholesterol and, 11, 269, 479 in coconut oil, 435 in corn oil, 480, 484 in cottonseed oil, 480, 484 data on food labels, 299, 439 in diet, 269 Dietary Guidelines for Americans on, 300 discussion of, 269–270 in frying shortening, 409 in household shortenings, 442 hydrogenation and, 111, 289 in liquid shortening, 435 in olive oil, 478 oxidation and, 277 positioning of, 7, 269, 279 in salad oil, 484 in soybean oil, 435, 480, 484 in sunflower oil, 480, 484 Monounsaturated triglycerides (USS), 123 Montmorillonite, 103–104, 107 Morocco, 3 Mortierella alpina, 65, 65–66 Mouth feel control of, 276 for cookie filler, 385 for crème fillings, 376, 377 of Danish pastry, 390 discussion of, 283–284 of donuts, 419 fat and, 264, 275 of fried foods, 405, 416 for icing, 376, 377 of lauric oils, 52, 353 of margarine, 172, 454, 457, 648 of monoglycerides, 625 salad oil and, 481 SFI and, 305, 310, 326, 457 sorbitan esters and, 317 for whipped toppings, 431 Mozambique, 3 Mucor mucedo, 65, 65–66 Mustard, 486 Mustard seeds, 270 Mutagenesis, 14 Myricil alcohol, 27 Myristic fatty acid in algal oil, 64 in butter, 427 in canola oil, 38, 40, 354, 491 cholesterol and, 11, 55, 268 classification of, 7, 268
Index
707
in coconut oil, 49, 268, 427 in corn oil, 27 in cottonseed oil, 21, 137, 138, 290, 303, 427, 491 in fungal oil, 65 in high-oleic safflower oil, 491 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 32, 354, 491 interesterification and, 293, 294 in lard, 53, 268 melting point and, 266 in menhaden oil, 62, 63 in milk, 59, 268 in NuSun sunflower oil, 31 in olive oil, 42 in palm kernel oil, 50, 51, 268, 427 in palm oil, 44, 46 in peanut oil, 24 positioning of, 7 in rapeseed oil, 354 in safflower oil, 34, 354 in soybean oil, 17, 138, 303, 427, 491 in sunflower oil, 29, 354 in tallow, 55, 56, 268 Myristoleic fatty acid in algal oil, 64 in butter, 427 in coconut oil, 427 constants for, 214 in cottonseed oil, 427 in lard, 53 melting point and, 266 in menhaden oil, 62 in milk, 59 omega designation, 266 in palm kernel oil, 427 in soybean oil, 427 in tallow, 56 Myrosinase, 37, 76
N National Cottonseed Producers Association, 228, 526 National Institute of Oilseed Products (NIOP), 50, 228, 526 National Nutrition Monitoring Advisory Council, 300 National Soybean Processors Association, 100, 228, 526 Natural bleaching earths, 103, 105 Nematodes, 15
Nervonic fatty acid, 24, 25, 40, 214 Neutral oil and loss method, 97–98, 229 New Guinea, 3 New product approval procedure, 517–518 Nickel ammonium sulfide and, 535 analysis for, 201 bromine and, 115 as catalyst; See Nickel catalyst FFA and, 115–116 frying and, 404 lard and, 160 for margarine plasticization, 178 nitrogen and, 115 oxidative stability and, 13, 542, 581, 627 palladium and, 115 phosphorus and, 115 sulfur and, 114, 115, 578 Nickel catalyst AOM stability and, 580 bleaching and, 144, 542 citric acid and, 581 CLA and, 275 for cottonseed oil, 303 for emulsifiers, 585 after filtration, 144, 542 frying shortening and, 404 historical background of, 349 in hydrogenation, 111, 114–116 moisture and, 533 soap and, 534, 578 for soybean oil, 122, 303, 536 testing of, 535 troubleshooting, 578–580 Nigeria, 3 NIOP, 50, 228, 526 Nitrogen carbon dioxide and, 591, 607 as creaming gas; See Creaming gas for emulsifiers, 585 flavor and, 595 for glyceride processing, 149 for handling, 164–165, 190–191 hydrogenation catalyst and, 115, 534, 578 in menhaden oil, 61 nickel and, 115 oxidation and, 92 oxidative stability and, 165, 189 packaging and, 16, 164–165, 444, 604 for PGEs, 151 for plasticization, 172–176, 179, 181 for salad dressing processing, 487, 489 for shipment, 164–165, 190–191 for soybean oil, 16
708 Index
for storage, 92, 164–165, 481 2-Nitro-propane, 143 NLEA; See Nutritional Labeling and Education Act NMR, 204, 289 Nondairy creamers, 426–429 Norman, W., 105, 349 Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), 204, 289 Nucleation, 134–135, 188, 209, 288 Nucoa margarine, 449 NuSun sunflower oil AOM stability of, 31 cold test of, 31 crystal habit of, 31 discussion of, 30–31 fatty acids in, 31, 31, 270, 422 iodine value of, 31, 278 melting point of, 31 oxidative stability of, 31, 277, 278 refractive index of, 31 saponification of, 31 for shortenings, 367, 422 specific gravity of, 31 titer test of, 31 triglycerides in, 31 unsaponifiable matter in, 31 waxes in, 31 Nutritional Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) enactment of, 450 on fat in food, 214 on health claims, 299, 456 on low-fat margarine, 457–458 requirements of, 297–298, 459 on salad oil, 479, 480 Nuts, 422, 492
O Octyl gallate, 455 Odor; See also Aroma of aldehydes, 219 of BHA, 168, 281–282, 643 from bleaching, 153 of bleaching earths, 109, 110 of canola oil, 625 of coconut oil, 50 of corn oil, 478 during deodorization, 161–163 of Dowtherm A, 159, 624 from FFA, 153–154 free radicals and, 166
of fried foods, 643 glycerine and, 147 from hydrogenation, 153 of lauric oils, 52 of lecithin, 320, 626 of linseed oil, 625 of liquid coffee whiteners, 428 of milk, 60 of mold, 625 off-flavor and, 625–625 of olive oil, 41, 74 of palm oil, 44 of phosphatides, 591–592 of rubber, 625 of soybean oil, 15–16 of sunflower oil, 29, 625 of tallow, 57 trace metals and, 16, 160 Off-flavor; See also Flavor reversion agitation and, 611 as analytical tool, 218 antioxidants and, 167 causes of, 219, 275 descriptions of, 218, 624–626 of fried foods, 413–414, 413, 640–643 of high-oleic sunflower oil, 413–414, 413 light exposure and, 166, 189, 596, 603–604, 626 of margarine, 648–649 moisture and, 198 of olive oil, 43 oxidation and, 164, 189, 275, 280, 368, 595, 626 of palm kernel oil, 52 phosphatides and, 595 phosphoric acid and, 161, 595–596 in potato chips, 22 of soybean oil, 16, 161, 624, 626 steaming and, 81 testing for, 222, 257 from thermal decomposition, 626 trace metals and, 160, 626 troubleshooting, 624–627 Oils availability of, 4 characteristics of, 1, 7–8, 264–265 consumption of, 4–7 in diet, 273 as energy source, 1 formulation of, 263–265 interchangeability of, 333–334 marine; See Marine oils processing of, 73–74, 75 sources of, 1, 2, 6
Index
specifications for, 504–506 structure of, 7–8 tests for; See Performance tests thermal shock temperature for, 90 traceability of, 513–515 vegetable; See Vegetable oils withdrawal of, 513 Olea europea; See Olive trees Oleic fatty acid in algal oil, 65 availability of, 269–270 in basestocks, 120 in butter, 427 in canola oil; See under Canola oil, oleic fatty acid in chemical refining and, 89, 571 cholesterol and, 23, 38, 270 classification of, 7 in cocoa butter, 215, 328, 333 in coconut oil, 49, 427 constants for, 214 in corn oil, 26, 27, 28 in cottonseed oil; See under Cottonseed oil, oleic fatty acid in FFA and, 221 fish oil and, 63 flavor and, 28, 36, 270 in frying shortening, 23, 28, 411, 412, 413, 413 in fungal oil, 65 in high-oleic safflower oil, 35, 36, 270, 354, 491 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 32, 33, 270, 354, 413, 491 hydrogenation and, 112–113, 116, 289 interesterification and, 292, 293, 294 isomerization of, 273, 290, 406, 485 in lard, 53, 270 in liquid oil, 473 melting point and, 112, 116, 266, 284 in menhaden oil, 62 in milk fat, 58, 59 in NuSun sunflower oil, 31, 270 in olive oil, 42, 42, 270, 478 omega designation, 266 oxidation of, 36, 164, 406 oxidative stability and, 14, 23, 270, 276, 627 in palm kernel oil, 51, 52, 427 in palm oil, 43, 44, 46, 47, 270 in peanut oil, 23, 24, 25, 270 petroselinic fatty acid and, 273 positioning of, 7, 112 in rapeseed oil, 354 reduction to stearic, 113
709
relative reactivity of, 116 in safflower oil, 14, 34, 354 in soybean oil; See under Soybean oil, oleic fatty acid in in sunflower oil, 14, 29, 30, 354 in tallow, 56, 270, 410 trans-isomer contents of, 36, 270 viscosity and, 491 Olein antioxidants and, 279 cottonseed, 296, 368 iodine value range, 47 lauric, 296, 368 menhaden, 63 milk, 60 oleic fatty acid in, 490 palm characteristics of, 46 cloud point, 297 dry method, 142 fatty acids in, 47, 464 iodine value of, 47, 297 margarine, 464 melting point, 297 trans fatty acids in, 411 value of, 296, 368 separation processes for, 142–143 soybean, 296 tallow, 297 unsaponifiable matter and, 47 Oleomargarine Act, 448 Oleo oil, 448–449 Olive oil acidity of, 41, 78 antioxidants in, 43 AOM stability of, 42 arachidic fatty acid in, 42 aroma of, 41 behenic fatty acid in, 42 blending of, 41 carotene in, 43 carotenoids in, 41 Carotenoids in, 43 characteristics of, 41–43 chemical refining of, 96 chlorophyll in, 13, 41, 42, 43 cholesterol and, 9, 478 classification of, 40–41 cloud point of, 42 cold test of, 42 color of, 13, 41 consumption of, 5, 6 for cooking oil, 475, 477, 478–479, 552–554 cottonseed oil and, 348
710 Index
crystal habit of, 42, 287 definition of, 40–41 deodorization of, 475 in diet, 478 diglycerides in, 41 discussion of, 40–43 extraction of, 74, 78 FFA in, 41, 78 flavor of, 41, 43, 74, 153, 280 fractionation of, 78, 552 gadoleic fatty acid in, 42 hazelnut oil and, 41 hydrolysis, 283 iodine value of, 41, 278 light exposure and, 43 lignoceric fatty acid in, 42 linoleic fatty acid in, 42, 42 linolenic fatty acid in, 42 margaric fatty acid in, 42 marketing of, 7 melting point of, 42 monounsaturated fatty acids in, 478 myristic fatty acid in, 42 odor of, 41, 74 oleic fatty acid in, 42, 42, 270, 478 organoleptic rating of, 41 oxidation of, 41–43 oxidative stability of, 41–43, 42, 278 palmitic fatty acid in, 42 palmitoleic fatty acid in, 42 peanut oil and, 23, 25 pheophytin in, 41 phosphatides in, 9 production of, 3, 4 refractive index of, 41 for salad oil, 475, 477, 478–479 saponification number of, 41 saturated fatty acids in, 42 solidification point, 42 source of; See Olives specific gravity of, 41 squalene in, 10, 43 stearic fatty acid in, 42 sterols in, 9 titer test of, 42 tocols in, 9, 42, 42 triglyceride composition of, 42 unsaponifiable matter in, 9, 10, 41, 43 unsaturated fatty acids in, 42 wax in, 42 wet-method batch refining for, 96 yield, 2–3, 3 Olives, 2–3, 3, 78 Olive trees, 2, 40
Omega-3 fatty acids from algae, 64, 337, 338 in canola oil, 37–38, 62–63, 337–338, 479, 480, 484 cholesterol and, 273, 300, 476 in corn oil, 480, 484 in cottonseed oil, 480, 484 in diet, 271–273, 337, 338, 476 Dietary Guidelines for Americans on, 441 FDA on, 61, 272–273, 456 in fish oil, 61–64, 337, 338 fortification with, 338–339 for frying shortening, 408 in fungus, 64, 65, 337 from GMOs, 15 health and, 271–273, 337, 476 health claims on, 300 in margarine, 450 melting point and, 266 in menhaden oil, 62, 63 metabolism of, 271, 272 polymerization of, 408 positioning of, 271, 272 in safflower oil, 338 in salad oil, 484 in soybean oil, 17, 62–63, 337, 338, 480, 484 in soybeans, 15 in sunflower oil, 480, 484 systematic name, 271 types of, 271 Omega-5 fatty acids, 266 Omega-6 fatty acids from algae, 64 in canola oil, 37–38, 62–63, 479, 480, 484 in corn oil, 480, 484 in cottonseed oil, 480, 484 in diet, 272, 337, 338, 476 Dietary Guidelines for Americans on, 300, 441 in fish oil, 62–64 in fungus, 65 health and, 272, 337 melting point and, 266 in menhaden oil, 62 metabolism of, 272 positioning of, 271–272 in safflower oil, 15 in salad oil, 484 sources of, 65 in soybean oil, 17, 62–63, 480, 484 in sunflower oil, 480, 484 systematic name, 271 Omega-7 fatty acids, 266 Omega-8 fatty acids, 266
Index
Omega-9 fatty acids, 131, 266 Omega-11 fatty acids, 266 Omega-12 fatty acids, 266 Operating standards, 496 OSI; See Oxidative Stability Instrument Ovis aries; See Sheep Oxalic acid, 100 Oxidation acetylated glycerides and, 316 aldehydes and, 164, 220 arachidonic fatty acid and, 277 bleaching and, 16, 102, 110, 144, 530, 592 of canola oil, 39 carotene and, 43, 567 carotenoids and, 12, 41, 164, 628 causes of, 275 chlorophyll and, 41, 144, 189, 227, 628 cis fatty acids and, 276–277 citric acid and, 596, 604 of coconut oil, 50, 641 color and, 102, 106, 592, 607–609 of corn oil, 27 of cottonseed oil, 20, 572 dead-end systems and, 118 definition of, 406 during deodorization, 157–158, 592–596 DHA and, 277 dimethylpolysiloxane and, 357, 402 discussion of, 276–283 dissolved oxygen levels, 604 emulsifiers and, 215–216, 313 EPA and, 277 of fish oil, 63 flavor and; See under Flavor, oxidation and fractionation and, 279 in frying, 233, 256, 400–404, 406, 636 from glycerolysis, 147 gossypol and, 83, 89, 565 during handling, 164–165, 190 of high-oleic safflower oil, 36 hydrogenation and, 36 induction period of, 223, 404, 578, 596, 599–600, 626 interesterification and, 278–279 isomerization and, 406 of lauric oils, 52, 641 light exposure and, 164, 189, 481, 628 of linoleic fatty acid, 36, 164 of linolenic fatty acid, 164, 277, 406 lipoxygenase and, 76 of menhaden oil, 277 moisture and, 628 monounsaturated fatty acids and, 277 nitrogen and, 92
711
after oilseed flaking, 563 of oleic fatty acid, 36, 164, 277, 406 of olive oil, 41–43 of palm kernel oil, 50, 641 of palm oil, 44 of peanut oil, 23 peroxide and, 164, 219–220, 593–594 pH and, 280 phases of, 404, 626 pheophytin and, 41, 144 phosphoric acid and, 596, 604 in polyethylene containers, 481 polymerization and, 406 polyunsaturated fatty acids and, 406, 441, 490 pressure and, 164 rancidity and, 217, 219–220 rosemary and, 627 of saturated fatty acids, 36 saturated fatty acids and, 276 of sequalene, 10 during shipment, 164–165, 190 shortening chips and, 358 silica and, 97, 105, 107 smoke point and, 408 of soybean oil, 18, 167, 595 steaming and, 160, 161 of sterols, 10, 628 in storage, 164–166, 629 structure and, 36, 63, 278–279, 627 of tallow, 410 temperature and, 164, 165, 190, 592–593, 595, 606, 628 tocols and, 9–10, 164, 279, 572, 592 trace metals and, 146, 160, 164, 404, 627 trans fatty acids and, 276–277 unsaturated fatty acids and, 164, 276–277, 406 vitamins and, 10, 164 water activity range and, 280 Oxidative stability of algal oils, 63, 338 analysis of, 221–223 anisidine value and, 106 antioxidants and, 164, 166–167, 216, 281–283, 627 AOM measurement of, 222–223, 278, 279 of basestocks, 306 bleaching and, 101–107 blending and, 365, 588 of canola oil, 38, 278, 491 carotenoids and, 41 chemical refining and, 574 chlorophyll and, 13, 628
712 Index
cis fatty acids and, 274 of coconut oil, 49, 278 color and, 225 copper and, 13, 542, 627 of corn oil, 26–28, 26, 278 of cottonseed oil, 21, 278, 491 discussion of, 276–283 emulsifiers and, 585, 628 fractionation and, 143, 337, 628 of frying shortening, 407 of high-oleic safflower oil, 35, 36, 278, 491 of high-oleic sunflower oil, 32, 32, 278, 491 hydrogenation and, 110, 114, 277–279, 279, 281, 306, 365 hydrolysis and, 628 inherent, calculation of, 277 interesterification and, 127, 442, 628 iodine value and, 277, 306, 308, 365 iron and, 13, 627 of lard, 53, 54, 277, 278 linoleic fatty acid and, 276 linolenic fatty acid and, 272, 278 of liquid oils, 490 manganese and, 13 of margarine, 339, 452 melting point and, 206 of menhaden oil, 278 of milk, 59, 277, 278 nickel and, 13, 542, 581, 627 nitrogen and, 165, 189, 190 of NuSun sunflower oil, 31, 277, 278 oleic fatty acid and, 14, 23, 270, 276, 627 of olive oil, 41–43, 278 OSI and, 223 of palm kernel oil, 51, 278 of palm oil, 44, 44, 47, 277, 278 pastry flavor test for, 237 of peanut oil, 24, 25, 277, 278 peroxide value and, 574 phospholipases and, 16 plasticity and, 306, 308, 365 polyunsaturated fatty acids and, 375, 627 process for, 166 reduction of, 567–568 of safflower oil, 34, 35, 37, 278 SFI and, 206 of shortenings all-purpose, 305 cake mix, 371 liquid cake, 375 soap and, 201 of soybean oil, 16–18, 17, 278, 278, 352, 491 steaming and, 82 stearidonic fatty acid and, 271
stearin and, 337, 588, 628 of sunflower oil, 29, 278 of tallow, 56, 278 TBHQ and, 168, 568 tocols and, 17, 167, 216–217, 279 trace metals and, 13, 283 trans fatty acids and, 274, 459 troubleshooting, 627–629 unsaturated fatty acids and, 306, 627 Oxidative Stability Instrument (OSI), 223 Oxidizability ratings, 277 Oxystearin, 482, 487, 489
P Packaging air exposure during, 189 attributes of, 481 of cake mixes, 372 consistency and, 180 control charts for, 518 control of, 549–554 of cooking oil, 189, 480–481 crystallization and, 189, 609 date of, 514–515, 655 design of, 521 of fat flakes, 554–555, 615, 620 flavor and, 189, 603–604, 649 glass vs. plastic, 481 hydrogenation and, 110 identification codes for, 514–515, 655–656 improper use of, 620 ingredient specifications on, 501–502 inspection before, 603–605 labels on; See Labels light exposure during, 166, 481 of liquid oils, 480–481, 554 of margarine flavor and, 649 history, 448, 450 industrial, 182, 465 liquid, 461 stick, 180, 460–461 troubleshooting, 646 tub, 180, 181, 460, 646 nitrogen and, 16, 164–165, 444, 604 of olive oil, 43 in process flow chart, 75 rate of, 604 of salad oil, 166, 189 of shortening cake, 551
Index
chips, 395, 615, 620 control of, 547–554 frying, 553 household, 444–445 icing, 551 liquid, 550–552, 553 puff paste, 394 smoking and, 639 stick, 445 troubleshooting, 605–611 specifications for, 502–504, 652 of spreads, 452, 467–469 of sunflower oil, 30 tempering and, 183, 185 troubleshooting, 603–611 of whipped toppings, 430 Pakistan, 3 Palatability, 275; See also Flavor Palladium, 115 Palm fruit description of, 43, 50 genetic modification of, 47–48, 50 harvesting of, 2 oil content of, 3 processing of, 50, 74, 78, 80–81 producing areas, 3 Palmitelaidic fatty acid, 266 Palmitic fatty acid in algal oil, 64 availability of, 268 in butter, 427 in canola oil, 38, 40, 215, 354, 491 cholesterol and, 11, 268 classification of, 7 in cocoa butter, 215, 333 in coconut oil, 49, 427 in corn oil, 27, 215 in cottonseed oil; See under Cottonseed oil, palmitic fatty acid in crystal habit and, 20, 215, 268, 286–287 FFA and, 221 in frying shortening, 412, 413 in fungal oil, 65 in high-oleic safflower oil, 36, 354, 491 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 32, 354, 413, 491 interesterification and, 292, 293, 294 in lard, 53, 55, 215, 268, 287 melting point and, 266, 284 in menhaden oil, 62, 63 in milk fat, 59 in NuSun sunflower oil, 31 in olive oil, 42 in palm kernel oil, 51, 427
713
in palm oil; See under Palm oil, palmitic fatty acid in in peanut oil, 24, 25, 215 plasticity and, 20 positioning of, 7 in rapeseed oil, 354 in safflower oil, 34, 354 in soybean oil; See under Soybean oil, palmitic fatty acid in stearin and, 47 in sunflower oil, 29, 354 in tallow, 56, 57, 268 vapor pressure of, 154 Palmitoleic fatty acid in algal oil, 64 availability of, 269 in butter, 427 in canola oil, 38, 40, 354, 491 in coconut oil, 427 in corn oil, 27 in cottonseed oil, see under Cottonseed oil, palmitoleic fatty acid in in fungal oil, 65 in high-oleic safflower oil, 36, 354, 491 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 33, 354, 491 in lard, 53 melting point and, 266 in menhaden oil, 62, 63 in milk, 59 in olive oil, 42 omega designation, 266 in palm kernel oil, 427 in palm oil, 44 in peanut oil, 24 in rapeseed oil, 354 in safflower oil, 34, 354 in soybean oil, 17, 138, 303, 427, 491 in sunflower oil, 29, 354 in tallow, 56 Palm kernel oil AOM stability of, 51 arachidic fatty acid in, 51, 427 Baumé concentration for, 89, 90, 528 behenic fatty acid in, 427 bleaching of, 50 butyric fatty acid in, 427 capric fatty acid in, 51, 427 caproic fatty acid in, 51, 267, 427 caprylic fatty acid in, 51, 267, 427 carotene in, 565 CBRs from, 143 characteristics of, 51–52 chemical refining of, 90 cholesterol in, 9
714 Index
cloud point of, 297 in cocoa butter substitutes, 311 coconut oil and, 50–52 color of, 50, 565–566 consumption of, 5, 6 crystal habit of, 51, 287 degumming of, 86 deodorization of, 155 discussion of, 50–52 FFA in, 52, 90, 283 flavor of, 52, 280 fractionation of, 142, 297 for frying, 415, 415, 641, 644 gadoleic fatty acid in, 51, 427 in hard butters, 124 hydrolysis, 280, 283 interesterification of, 127–128, 128, 462 iodine value of, 51, 52, 278, 297, 427 lauric fatty acid in, 50, 51, 52, 221, 267, 427 linoleic fatty acid in, 51, 427 linolenic fatty acid in, 427 liquid oils and, 626–627 margaric fatty acid in, 427 for margarine, 464–465 melting point of, 50, 52, 127, 267–268 Mettler dropping point of, 51, 297, 427 myristic fatty acid in, 50, 51, 268, 427 myristoleic fatty acid in, 427 oleic fatty acid in, 51, 52, 427 oxidation of, 50, 641 oxidative stability of, 51, 278 palmitic fatty acid in, 51, 427 palmitoleic fatty acid in, 427 palm oil and, 465 pentadelandic fatty acid in, 427 phosphatides in, 9 refining of, 80, 89–90 refractive index of, 51 saponification number of, 51 saturated fatty acids in, 52 SFC profile of, 52, 268 SFI curves, 128, 465 SFI profile of, 51, 127, 268, 427 for shortenings, 353, 429 solidification point, 51 source of; See Palm kernels specific gravity of, 51 stearic fatty acid in, 51, 427 sterols in, 9 titer test of, 51 tocols in, 9, 51 trans fatty acids in, 427 unsaponifiable matter in, 9, 51 unsaturated fatty acids in, 50, 52
uses of, 52 yield, 2, 3 Palm kernels, 3, 43, 50, 74–78 Palm oil AOM stability of, 44 arachidic fatty acid in, 45 arachidid fatty acid in, 293 basestocks and, 45–46, 302 Baumé concentration for, 89, 90, 528 bleaching of, 43, 79, 81, 104 capric fatty acid in, 293 caproic fatty acid in, 293 caprylic fatty acid in, 293 carotene in, 12, 43–48, 44 carotenoids in, 12, 43, 44, 45, 48 CBRs from, 143 characteristics of, 43–47 chemical refining of, 43–44, 89–90, 90, 92, 96, 571 cholesterol in, 9 cloud point of, 46, 47, 297 cocoa butter and, 333 coconut oil and, 293 cold test of, 44 color of, 43 consumption of, 5, 5, 6, 7 crystal habit of, 18, 45–47, 45, 215, 287 crystallization of, 47, 335, 366, 610 degumming of, 81, 86 density of, 46 diglycerides in, 45, 47, 335, 366 disaturate, 46 discussion of, 43–48 extraction of, 43–44, 78–79 FFA in, 79, 80 filtration of, 81 flavor of, 43, 280 fractionation of all-purpose shortening, 368 characteristics, 46, 297 cloud point, 297 coconut oil blend, 293 crystal habit, 45 crystallization, 47 dry method, 141, 142 fatty acids in, 47, 411, 464 iodine value of, 47, 297 margarine, 296, 462, 464 melting point, 297 olein vs. stearin, 296, 464 softening point, 47 unsaponifiable matter in, 47 value of, 296, 368 genetically modified, 47–48, 50
Index
gum in, 80 in hard butters, 311 hardening of, 291 health and, 45 hydrogenation and, 47 hydrolysis, 79, 283 interesterification of all-purpose shortening, 366 coconut oil blend, 293 crystal habit, 292 crystallization, 47 margarine, 462, 464 melting point, 126, 127 soybean oil blend, 294, 463 iodine value of, 44, 46, 47, 48, 278, 297 lard and, 45 lauric fatty acid in, 44, 293 linoleic fatty acid in, 44, 46, 293 linolenic fatty acid in, 45 for margarine, 43, 450, 456, 462, 464, 646–647 melting point of, 126, 127, 183, 297 Mettler dropping point of, 44 myristic fatty acid in, 44, 46, 293 odor of, 44 oleic fatty acid in, 43, 44, 46, 47, 270, 293 oxidation of, 44 oxidative stability of, 44, 44, 47, 277, 278 palmitic fatty acid in, 44, 46 coconut blend, 293 vs. cottonseed oil, 45, 268 crystal habit, 215 FFA and, 221 fractionated, 46 interesterification and, 293 vs. lard, 268 vs. tallow, 268 palmitoleic fatty acid in, 44 palm kernel oil and, 465 penetration test of shortening, 364–365, 364 PGEs of, 151 phosphatides in, 9 physical refining of, 47, 80–82 plasticity and, 47, 353 production of, 4 refining efficiency of, 98 refractive index of, 44 saponification number of, 44, 46 saturated fatty acids in, 45, 367 SFI profile of, 45, 293, 331 for shortenings all-purpose, 364–366, 364, 366, 368 colorant, 43 crackers, 395
715
frying, 411, 415 U.S. usage, 352, 353 softening point, 46, 47 solid fat content, 45, 46 solidification point, 44 source of; See Palm fruit soybean oil and, 2, 18, 43, 183, 294, 462 specific gravity of, 44 squalene in, 45 steaming of, 43, 78, 82 stearic fatty acid in, 44, 46, 48, 293 sterols in, 9, 45 structure of, 45 for sweet dough shortening, 383 tallow and, 45 titer test of, 44, 46, 207 tocols in, 9, 44, 44, 46, 48 tocopherols in, 10 trans fatty acid in, 293 trans fatty acids and, 335 triglyceride composition of, 45, 46, 47, 335, 366 unsaponifiable matter in, 9, 44, 45, 46, 47 unsaturated fatty acids in, 45, 48 vitamins and, 45, 48 wet-method batch refining for, 96 yield, 2, 3 Palm trees, 2, 43 Pans cooking oil for frying, 473 frying shortening for, 414–416, 415, 633–634, 637, 641–642 lubricants for, 492 seasoning of, 414 Paper chromatography, 217 Paprika, 486 Paraguay, 3 Parsley seed oil, 269 Partially hydrogenated basestocks, 120–121, 122 Pasteurization, 644, 645 Pastry flavor test, 224, 237 Pathogens, 488, 645 Pavlova salina, 15 PCBs, 159 Peanut butter, 315, 318 Peanut oil AOM stability of, 24 arachidic fatty acid in, 24, 268 Baumé concentration for, 90, 528 behenic fatty acid in, 24, 268 bleaching of, 23 characteristics of, 23–25 chemical refining of, 23, 90, 96 cholesterol and, 9, 23, 25
716 Index
cloud point of, 24 cold test of, 24 color of, 23 consumption of, 5, 6, 475 for cooking oil, 477–479, 477, 552–554 corn oil and, 23 crystal habit of, 24, 215, 287 deodorization of, 477, 552–554 discussion of, 22–25 dry-method batch refining of, 96 erucic fatty acid in, 24 flavor of, 23, 280, 641 fractionation of, 552 gadoleic fatty acid in, 24, 25 genetically modified, 25 in hard butters, 311 interesterification of, 336, 367 iodine value of, 24, 278 lignoceric fatty acid in, 24, 268 linoleic fatty acid in, 24, 25, 338 linolenic fatty acid in, 24, 25 melting point of, 23, 24 myristic fatty acid in, 24 nervonic fatty acid in, 24, 25 oleic fatty acid in, 23, 24, 25, 270 olive oil and, 23, 25 oxidation of, 23 oxidative stability of, 24, 25, 277, 278 palmitic fatty acid in, 24, 25, 215 palmitoleic fatty acid in, 24 PGEs of, 151 phosphatides in, 9 production of, 4 refining of, 23, 82, 89 refractive index of, 24 for salad oil, 474–475, 477–479, 477 saponification number of, 24 saturated fatty acids in, 25 for shortenings, 23, 25, 352, 367, 412, 421, 422 solidification point, 23, 24 soybean oil and, 23 specific gravity of, 24 steaming of, 82 stearic fatty acid in, 24, 25 sterols in, 9 structure of, 25 titer test of, 24, 207 tocols in, 9, 24 triglyceride composition of, 24 unsaponifiable matter in, 9, 23, 24 unsaturated fatty acids in, 25 winterization of, 23 yield, 3
Peanuts aflatoxin and, 23, 564 canola and, 4 cultivation of, 22–23 genetic modification of, 25 oil content of, 3, 23 oil roasting of, 422 processing of, 23, 74–78 producing areas, 3 resveratrol in, 23 Pecans, 625 Pectin, 458 Penetration test, 209–210, 364–365, 364, 551, 558, 630–631 Pentadecanoic fatty acid, 53, 56, 59, 62, 214, 266 Pentadelandic fatty acid, 427 Pepper, 486 Performance standards, 505 Performance tests cake mix, 233, 251–252 creaming volume, 230–231, 242, 630 crème filling, 232, 249–250 deep-fat frying, 233–234, 256–257 description of, 229–230 filling sandwich, 250 ice cream bar coating, 234, 258 icing volume, 231–232, 244 pound cake, 231, 243 on puff pastry, 233, 253–255 sandwich cookie filler, 258 weep, 250 white layer cake, 232, 245–248 Periodic acid oxidative stability method, 216 Perlite, 108 Peroxide analysis of, 219–220 AOM and, 223 ascorbyl palmitate and, 282 bleaching and, 104, 105, 144, 530, 580, 582, 595 in canola oil, 484 in corn oil, 484 in cottonseed oil, 484, 537, 541, 555 deodorization and, 153–154, 160, 162, 544, 592–595 flavor and, 160, 164, 595 free radicals and, 166, 596 FT-NIR analysis for, 212 hydrogenation and, 533 interesterification and, 129, 537, 580 lecithin and, 282 light exposure and, 166, 593 lipoxygenase and, 76 in margarine, 558
Index
olein and, 47 oxidation and, 164, 219–220, 593–594 oxidative stability and, 574 polymerization and, 593 press effect on, 107 rancidity and, 54, 219–220 in salad oil, 484, 484 Schaal oven test and, 223 in shortenings all-purpose, 545 cake, 547, 548, 551 icing, 547, 548, 551 liquid, 553, 613 in soybean oil; See under Soybean oil, peroxide value of in storage, 606 in sunflower oil, 484 tocols and, 282 Peru, 3, 22–23 Pesticides bleaching and, 13 classification of, 8 deodorization and, 13, 99, 161, 164 description of, 13 in fish oil, 338 genetic resistance to, 14 physical refining and, 81 solvent extraction and, 13 steaming and, 81 PET, 481 Petroleum ether, 200 Petroselinic fatty acid, 112, 266, 269, 273 PGE; See Polyglycerol ester PGME; See Propylene glycol monoester PGMS, 316 Phenols, 43, 77 Pheophorbids, 13, 628 Pheophytin, 13, 41, 43, 628 Philippines, 3, 48 Phosphatides; See also Gums ALCON treatment and, 571 in animal fats, 9 bleaching and, 8, 104, 530, 591 in canola oil, 8–9, 9, 88 categories of, 8 cephalins, 9 chemical refining and, 8, 80, 88, 90–91, 94 citric acid and, 9 color and, 591–592 cooking temperature and, 76, 571 degumming and, 8–9, 83–86, 571 deodorization and, 591–592 description of, 8–9 expanders and, 76, 571
717
flavor and, 595 heat-stress color test for, 530 hydrogenation and, 578, 580 lecithin; See Lecithin odor of, 591–592 peroxide value of, 220 phospholipases and, 76, 85 phosphoric acid and, 9, 39 physical refining and, 82 refining and, 8, 80–81 silica and, 105 in soybean oil, 9, 88 steaming and, 160 trans fatty acids and, 533 in vegetable oils, 9 water washing and, 91 winterization and, 583 Phosphatidic acid, 8, 85–86 Phosphatidylcholine, 8, 319 Phosphatidylethanolamine, 85–86, 319 Phosphatidylinositol, 8 Phospholipases, 16, 76, 85–87, 563, 571 Phospholipids cooking temperature and, 76, 571 degumming and, 86–88 frying shortening and, 637, 639 FT-NIR analysis for, 212 in meat fats, 566 membrane filtering for, 87 in palm oil, 45 phosphatides; See Phosphatides pressing temperature and, 77 silica and, 96–97 solvent extraction and, 78 in soybean oil, 8–9, 16, 87, 564–565, 595 trace metals and, 527 Phosphoric acid antioxidant activity and, 169, 283 in bleaching, 145 calcium and, 88 canola oil and, 39, 88 carbohydrates and, 591, 592 in chemical refining, 88–89 chlorophyll and, 39, 89 color of gums, 570 cottonseed oil and, 565 decomposition of, 596 in degumming, 83, 85, 86 deodorization and, 161, 591–593, 595–596 in dewaxing, 140 emulsifiers and, 587–588, 591, 592 FFA and, 543, 592, 607 flaking and, 617 flavor and, 161, 595–596
718 Index
frying shortening and, 404, 421, 638 in glycerolysis, 147, 149, 587 interesterification and, 125, 129, 144, 538, 580, 581 lecithin and, 100 in miscella refining, 94 overdose, 592 packaging and, 604 peroxide value and, 593 phosphatides and, 9, 88 soybean oil and, 88, 565 temperature and, 596 trace metals and, 13, 88, 596 Phosphorus bleaching and, 83, 105, 529, 530, 576 in canola oil, 87, 530 degumming and, 83, 85–88 hydrogenation and, 115, 527, 533, 578, 580 membrane filtering for, 87–88 in menhaden oil, 62 nickel and, 115 refining and, 80, 83, 89 in soybean oil, 87–88, 529, 530, 531 stearin and, 47 in sunflower oil, 87 Physical refining of coconut oil, 80 degumming before, 81, 82, 83 deodorization and, 82, 82, 155, 158 FFA and, 80–82, 154 incoming quality requirements for, 527 of lard, 80, 529 of palm kernel oil, 80 of palm oil, 43–44, 47, 80 process flow chart for, 82 of soybean oil, 80 steaming; See Steaming of sunflower oil, 29 of tallow, 80, 529, 530 Phytostanols, 11–12 Phytosterols, 11–12 Picker boxes, 173 Pie crusts classification of, 386–387 crystal habit for, 287, 334, 387, 388 emulsifiers for, 316 shortenings for, 54, 361, 386–387, 388, 420 Pigments bleaching and; See under Color, bleaching and carotenoids; See Carotenoids chemical refining and, 88 chlorophyll; See Chlorophyll classification of, 8
deodorization and, 154–155 description of, 12–13 gossypol; See Gossypol in menhaden oil, 61 miscella refining and, 94 in soapstock, 99 in soybean oil, 17 in sunflower oil, 28 in tallow, 56 Plankton, 61 Plant operations, 496 Plasticity of basestocks, 306, 307 for biscuits, 389 for cake mixes, 372–373 of coconut oil, 353 conditions for, 170, 288–289 of cottonseed oil, 20, 306–308 definition of, 20 emulsifiers and, 308 hardfats/stocks and, 306–308, 307 of lard, 52–55, 124, 348 melting point and, 308 optimum, 172 oxidative stability and, 306, 308, 365 palmitic fatty acid and, 20 palm oil and, 47, 353 rating of, 208–209, 236 SFI and, 171, 205, 206, 289, 305 for shortenings, 233, 410–411, 439–440 of soybean oil, 18 stress and, 288 of tallow, 57 Plasticization agitation and, 172, 176–181 consistency and, 170–176, 288–289, 548–549 crystal habit and, 306 discussion of, 170–185 of margarine, 177–182, 179, 467–468 measurement of, 209–210, 236, 289 nitrogen for, 172–176, 179, 181 pressure and, 176, 181, 548–549, 551 on process flow chart, 75 of shortenings, 174–177, 175, 356, 391, 444, 610–611 supercooling in, 171–172 temperature and, 548–549, 551 tempering in; See Tempering Platinum, 275 Poland, 3 Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), 159 Polyethylene tetraphthalate (PET), 481 Polyglycerates, 150 Polyglycerol ester (PGE)
Index
alcohol use, 146 for cake mixes, 372 discussion of, 150–151, 318 FDA on, 150 functionality of, 323, 324 HLB value of, 321 for margarine, 458 in mayonnaise, 482 for salad dressing, 487, 489 for shortenings, 370 in spreads, 648 temperature and, 586 Polymerization deep-fat frying test for, 233–234, 256–257 definition of, 406 dimethylpolysiloxane and, 402 of ethylene oxide, 150 foaming and, 401, 406, 634–637 in frying shortening, 400–402, 406, 408, 410, 417, 634–637, 640 of glycerol, 151 of high-oleic safflower oil, 36 oxidation and, 406 peroxide value and, 593 polyunsaturated fatty acids and, 634 soybean decomposition and, 564 sterols and, 10, 628 of tallow, 410 temperature and, 125, 155, 586 of unsaturated fatty acids, 406 wastewater from, 151 Polysorbates discussion of, 317 flavor and, 624 functionality of, 323 HLB value of, 321, 321 for mellorine, 317, 433 for salad dressing, 489 for shortenings all-purpose, 370 cake mix, 372 crème fillings, 378 icing, 378 liquid bread, 382, 382 yeast-raised dough, 380 for whipped toppings, 431 Polyunsaturated fatty acids from algae, 64 in butterfat, 435 in canola oil, 480 carbon dioxide and, 338 cholesterol and, 11, 450, 479 in coconut oil, 435 in corn oil, 26, 27, 480
719
in cottonseed oil, 480 data on food labels, 299, 439 in diet, 7, 270–273, 450 discussion of, 270–273 flavor and, 484, 640 in fungus, 65 health and, 270–272 hydrogenation and, 289, 490 iodine value and, 634 isomerization and, 406, 533 in lard, 54, 270 in margarine, 451 in marine oils, 270 melting point of, 490 in menhaden oil, 62 in microalgal oil, 64 in milk fat, 58 oxidation and, 406, 441, 490 oxidative stability and, 375, 627 polymerization and, 634 positioning of, 7, 270, 279 shelf life and, 120 in shortenings, 435, 438, 441, 442, 633, 634 in soybean oil, 15, 16, 435, 480, 564 in sunflower oil, 480 trans fatty acids and, 55, 533 Polyvinylchloride, 481 Pomace oil, 78 Pork, 167 Porphyrins, 564 Portugal, 3 Positional isomers, 273 Postbleaching color and, 581–582 control of, 538, 542–543 description of, 144–145 of emulsifiers, 585 after fractionation, 145 after hydrogenation, 144, 535, 580–582 of soybean oil, 543 of stearin, 145 temperature for, 582 troubleshooting, 581–582 Potassium, 168, 282, 629 Potassium chloride, 454 Potassium hydroxide, 99, 125, 220 Potato chips cottonseed oil for, 478 cyclopropenoid fatty acids and, 22 dimethylpolysiloxane and, 403, 421 frying fat absorbed by, 400 high-oleic safflower oil for, 36 preservatives in, 637 shortenings for, 405, 422
720 Index
Poultry chicken fat, 282, 400 chickens, 22, 100 gossypol and, 76 meat from; See Meat Poultry Inspection Act, 167, 281 Pound cake test, 231, 243 Pourable salad dressing, 488–490 Powdered fats, 187–188, 359 Powdered shortenings, 355, 359 Powdered sugar, 378, 385 Prebleaching of canola oil, 39, 577 chlorophyll removal in, 39, 144, 227, 564, 577 clays for, 564 color and, 576–577 control of, 530–532 of corn oil, 579 dewaxing after, 139, 140 flavor and, 595 peroxide value and, 537 phosphatides and, 591 phosphorus and, 529, 576 soap and, 537, 575–576, 591 of soybean oil, 531, 564, 577 temperature for, 577 trans fatty acids and, 578 troubleshooting, 575–578 vacuum system and, 102 Precoolers, 176 Prime steam lard, 79, 379 Procedures by AOCS, 521–522 complaint handling, 510–511, 654–655 discussion of, 509–521 forms for, 510 identification, 513–515 new product approval, 517–518 recall, 511–514, 655–656 for storage, 568 Process control system, 504, 524–532 Procter & Gamble, 349, 438 Product development, 325, 325–333, 495 Proofing, 315, 338, 381, 389–390 Propylene glycol monoester (PGME) alcohol use, 146 analysis of, 216 discussion of, 152, 316–317 functionality of, 152, 323, 324 HLB value of, 321 for shortenings all-purpose, 370 bread, 380
cake mix, 372 donuts, 418 liquid cake, 374 yeast-raised dough, 380 troubleshooting, 587 Propylene glycol monostearate (PGMS), 316 Propyl gallate, 167, 216, 281, 455, 636 Proteins aeration and, 372 bleaching and, 592 calories from, 99 in cheese, 432 classification of, 8 color from, 12, 76, 566 for dairy analogs, 426 deodorization and, 55, 592 from eggs, 485 as energy source, 1 filtration for, 55, 527, 529 flavor and, 625 in frying, 405 in margarine, 453–454 souring and, 566 steaming and, 55 TBHQ and, 282 tests for, 527 water washing for, 55, 529 in whipped toppings, 431 Puff paste margarine, 146, 182, 314, 469 Puff paste shortening consistency of, 392–393 cottonseed oil in, 393 crystal habit of, 393 crystallization of, 394 discussion of, 392–394 emulsifiers for, 146, 308, 314, 393 functions of, 356, 361 hardfat for, 308 hardfat in, 308, 393 melting point of, 393 Mettler dropping point of, 393 milk fat stearine in, 60 moisture in, 347 packaging of, 394 SFI profile of, 393 soybean oil in, 393 tallow in, 57 tempering of, 394 Puff pastry preparation of, 392, 394 properties of, 392–393 shortenings for; See Puff paste shortening tests for, 233, 253–255 Pyropheophorbides, 13
Index
721
Q Quality assurance, 495, 515, 517, 521 Quality control, 496, 622–624 Quality cost system, 518–520 Quality management areas involved in, 495–496 lab methods, 521–524 modification process control, 532–541 operating standards, 496 policy, 509 procedures; See Procedures process control system, 504, 524–532 specifications, 496–508, 515–518 troubleshooting, 649–656
R Radiation, 12, 14 Rancidity, 54, 166, 216–224, 421, 625, 649 Rancimat, 223 Random interesterification of coconut oil, 462 control of, 538 crystal habit and, 124, 535 definition of, 124 discussion of, 128–130, 291–294 enzymatic, 124, 131–132, 279, 292, 538 of lard, 124 for margarine, 461–462, 463 melting point and, 126, 127, 536 of palm kernel oil, 462 of palm oil, 462 SFI curves and, 535 for shortenings, 367, 441–442 trans fatty acids and, 335–336 Rapeseed oil; See also Canola oil consumption of, 5 crystal habit of, 287 fatty acids in, 14, 37, 39, 268–270, 354 glucosinolates in, 37 LEAR, 37 structure of, 39 Rapeseeds, 37, 77–78, 565; See also Canola seeds Rats, 22 Rearrangement; See Interesterification Recall procedure, 511–514, 655–656 Red wine, 23 Refined, bleached, and deodorized (RBD) oil, 16 Refining analysis of, 228–229
calcium and, 13, 527 chemical; See Chemical refining control points for, 528–529 at crusher/refiner plant, 73 “cup loss,” 228, 229, 528 efficiency of, 97–98 fractionation and, 82, 539 objective of, 80, 527–528 physical; See Physical refining of soybean oil; See under Soybean oil, refining of trace metals and, 13, 83, 527 Refining factor, 98 Refractive index as analytical tool, 213 AOCS on, 213 of canola oil, 37 of coconut oil, 49 of corn oil, 26 of cottonseed oil, 21 definition of, 212 of high-oleic safflower oil, 36 of high-oleic sunflower oil, 32 hydrogenation and, 119, 534 iodine value and, 119, 212, 213, 534 of lard, 53 of menhaden oil, 61 of milk, 58, 59 of NuSun sunflower oil, 31 of olive oil, 41 of palm kernel oil, 51 of palm oil, 44 of peanut oil, 24 in polymerization, 151 of safflower oil, 34 of soybean oil, 17 of sunflower oil, 29 of tallow, 56 temperature and, 213 trans fatty acids and, 213 Rendering control of, 527 deodorization after, 55 description of, 79 dry, 79 filtration after, 55 for fish oil, 61 material for, 52 on process flow chart, 75 quality standards for, 527 troubleshooting, 566 water washing after, 55 wet, 61, 79 Re-refining, 92
722 Index
Resins, 8 Resveratrol, 23 Rice bran oil, 10 Roll-in margarine/shortening all-purpose, 171 characteristics of, 182 consistency of, 209, 466, 469–470 crystal habit of, 183 crystallization in, 182, 470 for Danish pastry, 389–391, 391 description of, 466 frying shortening for, 306 hardfat for, 308, 464 Mettler dropping point of, 466 milk fat stearine for, 60 moisture in, 347 plasticity of, 209, 306, 469 for puff pastry, 392–393 SFI profile of, 466 tallow for, 57 test for, 253–255 Rosemary, 63, 282, 627 Rumenic fatty acid, 55, 57, 275 Russia, 3, 14, 28 Rust, 585, 608, 618
S Sabatier, Paul, 349 Safflower oil AOM stability of, 34, 35 arachidic fatty acid in, 34, 354 in basestocks, 35 Baumé concentration for, 90 behenic fatty acid in, 34, 354 characteristics of, 33–35 chemical refining of, 90, 96 cholesterol in, 9 CLA from, 275 cold test of, 34 consumption of, 6 for cooking oil, 477 corn oil and, 35 crystal habit of, 34, 287 dewaxing of, 479 dry-method batch refining of, 96 flavor of, 35, 280, 626 gadoleic fatty acid in, 34, 354 in hard butters, 311 hardening of, 290–291 high-oleic; See High-oleic safflower oil
hydrogenation of, 35 interesterification of, 295, 464 iodine value of, 34, 278 linoleic fatty acid in, 33–35, 34, 338, 354 linolenic fatty acid in, 15, 33, 34, 354 for margarine, 450, 451 marketing of, 7 for mayonnaise, 35, 483 melting point of, 34 myristic fatty acid in, 34, 354 oleic fatty acid in, 14, 34, 354 omega fatty acids in, 15, 338 oxidative stability of, 34, 35, 37, 278 palmitic fatty acid in, 34, 354 palmitoleic fatty acid in, 34, 354 PGEs of, 151 phosphatides in, 9 refining of, 82, 89 refractive index of, 34 for salad dressing, 35 for salad oil, 474, 477 saponification number of, 34 SFI profile of, 295 solidification point, 34 soybean oil and, 35 specific gravity of, 34 steaming of, 82 stearic fatty acid in, 34, 354 sterols in, 9 titer test of, 34 tocols in, 9, 34, 37 triglyceride composition of, 34 unsaponifiable matter in, 9, 34, 37 wax in, 34, 140, 474 yield, 3 Safflowers, 3, 33 Safflower seeds, 3, 74–78 Saffron, 483, 487 Sage, 282 Salad dressing cold test of oil for, 208, 326 corn oil for, 478 cottonseed oil for, 138 EDTA in, 282, 487, 489 French, 488, 489–490 Green Goddess, 489 Italian, 489 polysorbates for, 317 pourable, 488–490 preparation of, 488 rosemary for, 282 safflower oil for, 35 salad oil for, 133, 482, 487 soybean oil for, 16
Index
spoonable, 487–488 standard of identity for, 487, 488 sterols/stanols in, 12, 456 Salad oil AOM stability of, 484–485, 484 applications for, 476, 482, 552 from basestocks, 120 blends, 479 canola oil for, 474, 477–480, 477, 482 cold test for, 137, 208, 473, 474, 484, 485, 552 color of, 484, 484 vs. cooking oil, 133, 474 copper chromite and, 115 corn oil for, 27, 474, 477–482, 477 cottonseed oil for; See under Cottonseed oil, for salad oil description of, 473, 552 FFA in, 484, 484 flavor of, 484, 484 fractionation of, 133, 474 in French dressing, 489 functions of, 481 household, 479–481 hydrogenation for, 583 industrial, 481–482 iodine value of, 484, 484 linolenic fatty acid and, 138 for mayonnaise, 133, 474, 482–485 menhaden oil for, 63 monounsaturated fatty acids in, 484 NLEA on, 479, 480 olive oil for, 475, 477, 478–479 omega fatty acids in, 484 packaging of, 166, 189, 480–481 palm oil for, 48 for pan frying, 414 peanut oil for, 23, 474–475, 477–479, 477 peroxide value of, 484, 484 polymerization of, 414 quality assessment, 484 safflower oil for, 474, 477 for salad dressing, 133, 482, 487, 489 saturated fatty acids in, 473, 484, 485 soybean oil for; See under Soybean oil, for salad oil sunflower oil for, 474, 479–480 trans fatty acids in, 484, 485 usage of, 476, 477 from winterization, 133, 136, 474, 540 yield, 583 Sales, 495 Salmon, 338 Salmonella, 488, 645
723
Salt equipment and, 174, 177–178 in frying shortening, 415, 422 after interesterification, 581 lecithin and, 454 in margarine, 454, 455, 558 in mayonnaise, 486 in salad dressing, 488 taste of, 218 in wet-method batch refining, 96 in whipped toppings, 431 Sandwich cookie filler test, 259 Saponification; See also Soap of canola oil, 37 in chemical refining, 88–90, 92, 573 of coconut oil, 49, 89 of corn oil, 26 of cottonseed oil, 21 definition of, 211 FT-NIR analysis for, 212 of high-oleic safflower oil, 36 of high-oleic sunflower oil, 32 in interesterification, 131 of lard, 53 of lauric oils, 211 of menhaden oil, 61 of milk, 58, 59 of NuSun sunflower oil, 31 oil temperature and, 90 of olive oil, 41 of palm kernel oil, 51, 89 of palm oil, 44, 46, 89 of peanut oil, 24 of safflower oil, 34 in short-mix method, 92 of soybean oil, 17 of sunflower oil, 29 of tallow, 56 in ultrashort-mix method, 92 Sardines, 338 Saturated fatty acids in basestocks, 120–121 in butterfat, 435 in canola oil, 38, 478, 480, 484 cholesterol and, 11, 267–268, 274, 532 climate and, 20 in coconut oil, 50, 386, 435 in corn oil, 27, 478, 480, 484 in cottonseed oil, 20, 22, 145, 441, 480, 484, 555 creaming gas and, 172 data on food labels, 298, 439 in diet, 7, 267, 450
724 Index
Dietary Guidelines for Americans on, 300, 441, 459 discussion of, 265–269 FDA on, 11, 456 health claims on, 299–300 hydrogenation and, 135, 145, 145, 532 interesterification and, 126, 133 in lard, 388 long-chain; See Long-chain fatty acids in margarine, 460, 558 medium-chain; See Medium-chain fatty acids melting points of, 111, 265–268 in milk fat, 58 in olive oil, 42 oxidation and, 36, 276 in palm kernel oil, 52 in palm oil, 45, 367 in peanut oil, 25 positioning of, 7, 8, 111, 126, 265–268 in salad oil, 473, 484, 485 short-chain; See Short-chain fatty acids in shortenings all-purpose, 366, 545 cake, 547, 551 cookie fillers, 386 frying, 409, 411 household, 442 icing, 547, 551 liquid, 435, 553 pie crusts, 388 in soybean oil; See under Soybean oil, saturated fatty acids in in sunflower oil, 480, 484 in tallow, 55, 57, 145, 367 trans fatty acids and, 367 winterization and, 135 Schaal oven test, 223–224 Screening, 524–525 Screw press extraction, 76–77 Semifine virgin olive oil, 41 Senegal, 3 Sequalene, 10 Serving sizes, 298 Sesame oil, 151, 475 Setting point, 207–208 SFC; See Solids fat content SFI; See Solids fat index SFI curves beta-crystal forms and, 305 for biscuit shortenings, 389 for cookie fillers, 206, 308 flat, 205, 305 for frying shortening, 304 hydrogenation selectivity and, 121, 365, 533
interesterification and, 292, 535 isomerization and, 111, 114 for lauric fatty acid, 268 for margarine oil, 648 for margarines, 304, 305, 306, 308 melting point and, 206 for partially hydrogenated basestocks, 121 plasticity and, 206, 305 vs. SFC curves, 205–206, 205 for shortenings, 304, 305, 306 “slope unawareness” and, 326 for soybean oil, 122, 123 for spreads, 206, 308 steep, 206, 305, 308–311 temperature and, 113 triglyceride composition and, 291 typical, 304 Shark liver oil, 10 Sheep, 55; See also Tallow Shipment air exposure during, 164–165, 190–191 AOCS on sampling during, 546 cleaning before, 546 contamination during, 169, 190, 600–602 control during, 546–547 of cooking oil, 189 hydrolysis during, 190 ingredient specifications on, 502 inspection before, 546, 602 light exposure during, 166 of margarine, 189 Mettler dropping point during, 545 moisture from, 190 nitrogen for, 164–165, 190–191 oxidation during, 164–165, 190 packaging specifications on, 504 quality standards for, 548 records of, 655 of salad oil, 189 sealing of containers/tanks, 546, 601, 602 of shortenings, 548, 621–622 of spreads, 189 steaming during, 190 temperature during, 165, 190, 605 tempering before, 355 troubleshooting, 600–602, 605 Short-chain fatty acids in butter, 267 in butterfat, 58 in cheese, 432 cholesterol and, 267 deodorization and, 155, 546, 589 flavor and, 52, 220, 267, 627 interesterification and, 131
Index
positioning of, 267 rancidity and, 220 saponification value and, 211 saturated, 267 temperature and, 267 Shortening all-purpose; See All-purpose shortening appearance rating, 238, 239 applications for, 355–357 baker’s; See Baker’s margarine/shortening for biscuits, 388–389 for bread, 379–383 for cake mixes, 370–373 for cakes; See under Cakes, shortenings for for cheese, 432 classification of, 355 color of; See under Color, of shortenings consistency of; See under Consistency, of shortenings for cookie fillers, 384–386, 386 for cookies, 308, 348, 384 creaming gas for, 172, 175, 176, 630 for crème fillings, 377–378 crystal habit of; See under Crystal habit, of shortenings for dairy analogs, 426 for Danish pastry, 389–392 deodorization of, 547 description of, 347 development of, 356 for donuts, 308, 405, 416, 417–419 equipment for, 172–176, 350, 356–357 FFA in all-purpose, 545 cake, 547, 548, 551 frying, 413, 638–639, 641 icing, 547, 548, 551 liquid, 553 troubleshooting, 607 food labels for, 521 forms of, 355 for frying; See Frying shortening functions of, 347, 361 historical background of, 348–351 household; See Household shortenings for icings, 209, 377–378 interchangeability of, 351–352 liquid; See Liquid shortening for liquid coffee whiteners, 428 Mettler dropping point of, 605 for milk analogs, 434 moisture in; See under Moisture, in shortenings for nondairy creamers, 428, 429
725
packaging of, 547–554, 551, 605–611 palm oil for, 43 peroxide value of, 606 for pie crusts, 54, 361, 386–387, 388, 416, 420 plasticization of, 174–177, 175, 356, 391, 444, 610–611 plastic range of, 363–364 puff paste; See Puff paste shortening roll-in; See Roll-in margarine/shortening SFI curves for, 304, 305, 306 SFI profile of all-purpose, 171, 366, 545 cake, 547, 551 consistency and, 630–631 cookie filler, 386 cookie fillers, 386 cracker, 396 crackers, 396 Danish pastry, 391 donuts, 418–419 frying; See under Frying shortening, SFI profile of household, 442 icing, 547, 551 icing stabilizers, 359, 379 liquid bread, 381, 382 measurement points, 326 pie crust, 388 puff paste, 393 shipment of, 548, 621–622 sources of, 352–354 soybean oil for; See under Soybean oil, for shortenings specialty bakery cake, 373–374 standard of identity for, 347 storage of, 549, 551, 553, 621–622 streaks in, 610 for sweet doughs, 383, 419 tempering of, 173, 175, 182–185, 355, 357 tests for; See Performance tests trans fatty acids in, 353 troubleshooting, 605–611, 621–622, 629–643 usage of, 352, 354 for whipped toppings, 431, 431 Shortening chips applications for, 363, 394 chill roll coolant temperatures, 186 color of, 617–620 development of, 351, 394 FFA in, 616–617 flavors of, 394 hydrolysis of, 395 iodine value of, 620–621 lauric oils for, 395
726 Index
melting point of, 185, 358, 394–395 oxidation and, 358 packaging of, 395, 615, 620 production of, 358–359, 395 size of, 617 soybean oil for, 395 tempering of, 617 thickness of, 187, 395 trans fatty acids and, 359, 395 troubleshooting, 615–621 Shortening flakes applications for, 363, 381 color of, 617–620 composition of, 355 crystallization in, 614–615 description of, 358 development of, 351 FFA in, 616–617 iodine value of, 620–621 packaging of, 554–555, 615, 620 size of, 617 tempering of, 617 troubleshooting, 614–621 Short-mix caustic refining, 92, 93 Silica, 87, 91, 96–97, 105–107, 538 Silver, 115 Single-cell microbe oils, 64–66, 337 Sitostanol, 12 Sitosterol, 11, 12 Skillet moisture analysis, 199 Slipping point, 202–203 Smell; See Aroma; Odor Smoke point AOCS on, 221 emulsifiers and, 221, 639 FFA and, 221, 639 filtration and, 639 lecithin and, 320, 626 of shortenings all-purpose, 369 dimethylpolysiloxane and, 402 frying, 221, 402, 408, 438, 639 household, 438, 440 hydrolysis and, 408 moisture and, 400 tests for, 198–199 Snacks corn chips, 421 fat absorption rate, 420 frying shortening for, 420–422 potato chips; See Potato chips Soap; See also Saponification analysis for, 201, 528 AOCS on, 201
bleaching and, 103–105, 107, 530, 537, 575–576, 591 carbon dioxide and, 131 chemical refining and, 88, 90–100, 572–574 color and, 591–592 in cottonseed oil, 537 deodorization and, 591 dewaxing and, 140 flavor of, 625 frying and, 201, 401, 633, 637, 638 hydrogenation and, 533–534, 578 interesterification and, 125, 129–131, 129, 537–538, 580 peroxide value and, 593 residual, 528, 601 silica and, 97, 105 sodium hydroxide and, 87, 129 in soybean oil, 529, 531 soybeans and, 15 steaming and, 160 water washing and, 91, 92, 96, 97, 574–575 winterization and, 583 Soap detection test, 597 Soapstock acidulation of, 81–83, 98–99 assessment of, 528 in batch refining, 95–96 chemical refining and, 88, 90–100, 573–574 composition of, 81, 90–91 degumming and, 83 disposal of, 80, 81 in miscella refining, 94 neutralized dried process for, 100 in physical refining, 80–82 on process flow chart, 93 in short-mix method, 92 soybean decomposition and, 564 sterols from, 12 Society of Cotton Products Analysts, 521; See also American Oil Chemists’ Society (AOCS) Sodium, 13, 168, 282, 629 Sodium caseinate, 430, 434 Sodium chloride, 96, 454; See also Salt Sodium hexametaphosphate, 489 Sodium hydroxide analysis for, 201 in chemical refining Baumé concentration and, 90 canola oil, 90 coconut oil, 90 corn oil, 90 cottonseed oil, 90 FFA and, 80, 572–573
Index
flow chart for, 93 formula for, 89 oleic fatty acid and, 89, 571 palm kernel oil, 90 palm oil, 90 peanut oil, 90 phosphatides and, 80 vs. potassium hydroxide, 99 safflower oil, 90 saponification and, 88, 528 vs. sodium silicate, 97 soybean oil, 90 sunflower oil, 90 in degumming, 87, 528 in dewaxing, 140 in esterification, 585 ethylene oxide and, 150 FFA and, 80, 220, 572–573 in glycerolysis, 147, 148, 149 in interesterification, 125, 129, 538, 580 in miscella refining, 94 in polymerization, 151 Sodium lauryl sulfate, 139–140, 142 Sodium methoxide, 126–127 Sodium methylate, 125–126, 129, 538, 580 Sodium phosphate, 169 Sodium potassium, 125, 130 Sodium silicate, 97 Sodium stearoyl lactylate (SSL), 318, 380, 382, 383 Sodium stearyl fumarate, 380 Softening point, 202 Soft-tub margarine appearance of, 646 consistency of, 180–181, 451–452, 461, 468, 646–647 creaming gas for, 468 crystallization of, 468 flavor of, 649 formulations for, 461 hydrogenation for, 460, 461 introduction of, 451 iodine value of, 458 liquid oil in, 460, 461 Mettler dropping point of, 458 milk olein for, 60 oxidative stability of, 452, 461 packaging of, 503 plasticization of, 172, 180–181 polyunsaturated fatty acids in, 451 preparation of, 468–469 pressure for, 181, 469 process flow chart for, 179 safflower oil for, 35
727
saturated fatty acids in, 460 SFC profile of, 458 SFI profile of, 458, 460 soybean oil for, 460 taste of, 172 temperatures for, 181, 468 trans fatty acids in, 460 Sole, 338 Solids fat content (SFC) AOCS on, 204, 205 definition of, 111 development of, 204 diglycerides and, 132 discussion of, 204–206 fractionation and, 296 of frying shortening, 405 interesterification and, 293, 294, 335, 463 of margarine, 456–457, 457, 458 of palm kernel oil, 52, 268 plasticity and, 289 vs. SFI, 205, 205 of soybean oil, 296 of tallow, 57 Solids fat index (SFI) as analytical tool, 121, 204 AOCS on, 204 basestocks and, 121, 306–308, 307 blending and, 327–328, 327, 329, 589 of butter, 391, 427, 466 cloud point and, 208 of coconut oil, 49, 268, 386, 427 of corn oil, 295, 329, 330 of cottonseed oil; See under Cottonseed oil, SFI profile of curves; See SFI curves definition of, 111, 121 development of, 203 discussion of, 204 vs. DSC analysis, 206 hardfats/stocks and, 306–308, 307, 327–328 hydrogenation and, 121 interesterification and, 127, 128, 292, 295, 335 isomerization and, 111 of lard, 54, 127, 128, 388 of lauric oils, 308, 335 liquid dilution factor calculations for, 327–328, 327, 330 of margarine; See under Margarine, SFI profile of melting point and, 206, 651 of milk fat, 59 of palm kernel oil, 51, 127, 128, 268, 427 of palm oil, 45, 331
728 Index
plasticity and, 171, 205, 206, 289 pressure and, 114 of safflower oil, 295 of shortenings; See under Shortenings, SFI profile of of soybean oil; See under Soybean oil, SFI profile of of sunflower oil, 295 of tallow, 57, 57 temperature and, 113 time for, 535 triglyceride composition and, 291 Solids-to-liquids ratio; See Consistency Solvent dewaxing, 140 Solvent extraction of algal oils, 64 of canola oil, 37, 39 of coconut oil, 48 direct, 77–78, 94 equipment used in, 110 expanders and, 76 vs. expelling, 77 after filtration, 109–110 flash point evaluation after, 526 of fungal oil, 65 miscella refining and, 92–94 of olive oil, 78 of palm kernel oil, 50 pesticides and, 13 prepress, 77 on process flow chart, 75 of safflower oil, 33 troubleshooting, 573–574 Solvent fractionation, 132, 141–144, 490, 539 Solvent winterization, 136–137 Sorbic acid, 455, 558 Sorbitan esters, 317, 321, 323, 647 Sour cream analog, 433–434 South Africa, 3 Soybean oil antioxidants for, 18, 167 AOCS evaluation method for, 97 AOM stability of, 17, 386, 396, 484, 568 arachidic fatty acid in, 18, 138, 427, 491 in basestocks for baking, 383 brush hydrogenated, 120, 122, 302, 303, 443 crystal habit, 631 dilution factor, 327, 330 discussion of, 306–308 fatty acids in, 122, 303, 536 feedstock for, 302 for frying, 415, 443
hardfat, 122, 303, 307 iodine value, 17, 121, 122, 303, 536 for margarine oil, 310 Mettler dropping point, 122, 303, 536 postbleaching, 543 quality standards, 536, 543 SFI curves, 307 SFI profile of, 122, 303, 536 titer, 122, 303 Baumé concentration for, 90, 528 behenic fatty acid in, 18, 427, 491 bleaching of, 16, 18, 104–105, 229, 530, 531, 543 blending of, 15, 329, 330, 331, 427 bump factors, 332 butyric fatty acid in, 427 calories from, 480 canola oil and, 294 capric fatty acid in, 427 caproic fatty acid in, 427 caprylic fatty acid in, 427 CBRs from, 143 characteristics of, 17–18 chlorophyll in after bleaching, 105, 530 causes of, 564, 572 color from, 13 control of, 526 discussion of, 16, 18 quality standards for, 529, 531 cholesterol in, 9, 388, 435, 480 citric acid and, 16, 352, 565 classification of, 15 cloud point of, 17, 297 coconut oil and, 294 cold test of, 17, 137, 138, 474, 484, 531 color of; See under Color, of soybean oil consistency of, 18 consumption of, 5, 5, 6, 7, 15, 17, 475 for cooking oil, 477–480, 477 cottonseed oil and all-purpose shortening, 545 cost, 15 crystal habit, 18, 183 dairy analog, 427 high-stability, 491 history, 7, 20 interesterification, 294 linolenic fatty acid, 16 U.S. usage, 16–17 crystal habit of, 18, 287 discussion of, 17–18 in fat flakes, 286 in margarines, 310
Index
palmitic fatty acid and, 215 pie crust shortening, 388 plasticity and, 183, 631 crystallization of, 138–139, 312, 539 degumming of, 16, 87–88, 570, 595 deodorization of, 16, 17, 156, 274 discussion of, 15–19 dry-method batch refining of, 96 emulsifiers and, 151, 317 erucic fatty acid in, 18, 491 FFA in chemical refining, 529 decomposition, 564 flaking, 556 frost damage, 564 hydrogenation, 536 postbleach, 543 prebleaching, 531 salad oil, 484 flakes, 556 flavor of assessment of, 280 citric acid and, 352 decomposition, 564–565 deterioration of, 626 discussion of, 15–16, 18 frost damage, 564 hydrogenation, 138, 278 iodine value, 281 light and, 626 linolenic fatty acid, 138 nitrogen and, 595 “off,” 16, 161, 624, 626 oxidation and, 280–281 oxidative stability and, 278 peroxide, 220 phosphoric acid and, 161 salad oil, 484 winterization and, 138 fractionation of, 16, 17, 138, 296, 297 gadoleic fatty acid in, 18, 427, 491 genetically modified, 18–19, 19 glycerolysis with, 147–148 in hard butters, 311 hardening of, 290–291 heat break test of, 529 heat stress color rise in, 531 high-stability, 491 hydrogenation of catalysts, 115 conditions, 122, 303 discussion, 16, 17 flavor, 138, 278 before fractionation, 296
729
frying, 410 for household use, 442 iodine value, 309 isomerization, 278, 308–310 long-chain fatty acids, 309 oxidative stability, 278 quality standards for, 536 SFI curves, 309 temperature, 309 winterization, 138 hydrolysis, 564 interesterification of, 126, 292, 294, 336, 442, 463 iodine value of, 17, 427 all-purpose shortening, 366 basestock, 138 blending, 329, 330, 331 brush hydrogenated, 122, 303 bump factor, 332 cloud point, 297 cottonseed blend, 427 discussion, 17 filtration, 296 flakes, 556, 615 flat, 122, 303 flavor, 281 frost damage, 564 genetically modified, 19 hardfat, 122, 303 high-stability, 491 liquid shortening, 375, 427 long-chain fatty acids, 309 margarine, 460 melting point, 297 olein, 296, 297 oxidative stability, 278 pie crust shortening, 388 quality standards for, 536 salad oil, 138, 484 SFI curve, 123, 309 SFI profile, 329, 330, 331 stearin, 138, 296, 297 steep, 122, 303 sweet dough shortening, 383 temperature, 123, 309 winterized, 138 lard and, 17, 18 lauric fatty acid in, 427, 491 lecithin and, 83, 100, 319 lignoceric fatty acid in, 18 linoleic fatty acid in, 18, 427 brush hydrogenated, 122, 303 cottonseed blend, 427 discussion of, 17, 18
730 Index
flat, 122, 303 genetically modified, 19 hardfat, 122, 303 high-stability, 491 to linolenic ratio, 338 liquid shortening, 427 polymerization, 564 salad oil, 138 stearin, 138 steep, 122, 303 winterized, 138 linolenic fatty acid in, 18, 427 brush hydrogenated, 122, 303 discussion of, 15–19 flat, 122, 303 flavor and, 138 genetically modified, 19 hardfat, 122, 303 high-stability, 491 to linoleic ratio, 338 oxidative stability and, 278, 352 polymerization, 564 salad oil, 138, 477 stearin, 138 steep, 122, 303 winterization and, 138 for liquid coffee whiteners, 428 long-chain fatty acids in, 309 margaric fatty acid in, 17, 427, 491 for margarine crystallization, 310 industrial, 16 interesterification, 466 liquid, 461, 462 palm blend, 462 polyunsaturates, 451 SFI curves, 449 soft-tub, 460 stick, 460 U.S. usage, 451 for mayonnaise, 16, 483 for mellorine, 433 melting point of, 17, 126, 127, 183, 297 membrane filtering of, 87–88 menhaden oil and, 62 Mettler dropping point of brush hydrogenated, 303 cookie fillers, 386 cottonseed blend, 427 crackers, 396 dairy analog, 427 flat, 303 hardfat, 303 liquid shortening, 427
pie crust shortening, 388 postbleaching, 543 quality standards for, 536 stearin, 297 steep, 303 for milk analogs, 434 moisture in, 529, 531, 536, 543, 556 molecular weight of, 147 monounsaturated fatty acids in, 435, 480, 484 myristic fatty acid in, 17, 138, 303, 427, 491 myristoleic fatty acid in, 427 nitrogen and, 16 for nondairy creamers, 428, 429 nutritional labeling on, 480 odor of, 15–16 oleic fatty acid in, 18 brush hydrogenated, 122, 303 cottonseed blend, 491 dairy analog, 427 discussion of, 17 flakes, 615 flat, 122, 303 genetically modified, 19, 19 hardfat, 122, 303 high-stability, 491 salad oil, 138 stearin, 138 steep, 122, 303 winterized, 138 omega fatty acids in, 17, 62–63, 337, 338, 480, 484 oxidation of, 18, 167, 595 oxidative stability of, 16–18, 17, 278, 278, 352, 491, 564–565 palmitic fatty acid in, 17 cottonseed blend, 427, 491 fractionated, 19 genetically modified, 19, 19 hardfat, 122, 303 hydrogenated, 122, 215, 303, 427, 491 liquid shortening, 427 salad oil, 138 saturated, 19 stearin, 138 unsaturated, 19 winterized, 138 palmitoleic fatty acid in, 17, 138, 303, 427, 491 palm oil and, 2, 18, 43, 183, 294, 462 peanut oil and, 23 penetration test of, 210, 211 pentadelandic fatty acid in, 427 peroxide value of flaking, 556
Index
flavor, 220 hydrogenation, 536 oxidation, 220 oxidative stability, 574, 593–594 postbleaching, 543 prebleaching, 531 salad oil, 484 phosphatides in, 9, 88 phospholipids in, 8–9, 16, 87, 564–565, 595 phosphoric acid and, 88, 565 phosphorus in, 87–88, 529, 530, 531 pigments in, 13, 16, 17 polyunsaturated fatty acids in, 15, 16, 435, 480, 564 production of, 3, 4 refining of chemical, 89, 90, 96, 529 decomposition, 564 discussion of, 17 efficiency of, 97 frost damage, 564 physical, 80–82 refractive index of, 17, 536 safflower oil and, 35 for salad dressing, 16 for salad oil discussion of, 16–17, 477–482 flavor of, 138 fractionated, 474 hydrogenated, 138, 138 hydrogenation catalyst for, 115 U.S. usage, 477 winterized, 138 saponification number of, 17 saturated fatty acids in cookie fillers, 386 frost damage, 564 genetically modified, 19, 19 milk analogs, 435 palmitic, 19 pie crust shortening, 388 quality standards for, 536 salad oil, 480, 484 stearic, 19 structure of, 17 SFI curves, 123, 211 SFI profile of brush hydrogenated, 122, 303 cookie filler shortening, 386 corn oil and, 330 cottonseed oil and, 330, 331, 427 cracker shortening, 396 flat, 122, 303 frying shortening, 415
731
hardfat, 122, 303 iodine value and, 329, 330 liquid dilution factor, 327, 330 liquid shortening, 427 palm oil and, 331 pie crust shortening, 388 quality standards for, 536 selective hydrogenated, 427 steep, 122, 303 for shortenings all-purpose, 366, 367 bread, 312 chips, 395 cookie fillers, 385, 386 crackers, 395, 396 crème fillings, 378 Danish pastry, 391 frying, 310, 353, 410–412, 415, 415, 421, 443 history, 352–353 household, 441, 442 icing, 378 liquid, 312 liquid bread, 382 liquid cake, 375 pie crust, 387, 388 puff paste, 393 sweet doughs, 383 U.S. usage, 352 soap in, 529, 531 solidification point, 17 for sour cream analogs, 434 specific gravity of, 17 for spreads, 310 stanols from, 12 steaming of, 82 stearic fatty acid in, 17 brush hydrogenated, 122, 303 cottonseed blend, 427, 491 dairy analog, 427 discussion of, 18 flakes, 615 flat, 122, 303 genetically modified, 19 hardfat, 122, 303 high-stability, 491 liquid shortening, 427 salad oil, 138 stearin, 138 steep, 122, 303 winterized, 138 sterols in, 9 structure of, 17 sunflower oil and, 28
732 Index
tallow and, 18, 183 TBHQ and, 568 titer test of, 17, 122, 207, 303 tocols in, 9, 17, 17 trace metals in, 16, 18, 87, 565 trans fatty acids in brush hydrogenated, 122, 303 cookie fillers, 386 cottonseed blend, 427 dairy analog, 427 deodorization, 274 flat, 122, 303 hardfat, 122, 303 hydrogenation, 274 iodine value, 309 labeling, 480 milk analog, 435 pie crust shortening, 388 quality standards for, 536 salad oil, 484 steep, 122, 303, 308–310 triglyceride composition of, 18 unsaponifiable matter in, 8–9, 9, 13, 16–18, 17 for whipped toppings, 431 winterization of, 16, 17, 115, 138, 138, 540 yield, 2, 3 Soybeans, 3, 15–19, 74–78, 452, 563–565, 571 Spain, 3 Specification change requisition, 515–516, 650 Specifications, 496–508, 515–518, 649–654 Specific gravity to volume conversion, 230–231 Spectrophotometry, 226, 227 Spin test, 528 Spoonable salad dressing, 487–488 Spray cooling, 187–188 Spray-dried nondairy creamers, 428–429 Spray-dried powdered shortenings, 359 Spreads appearance rating, 240, 241 bacteria in, 644–645 consistency of, 209 control points for, 557 development of, 452 emulsifiers for, 315, 318, 645, 648 fat content of, 450, 452, 453, 458, 557 flow chart for, 179 formulations for, 458–459, 648 health claims on, 456 industrial, 469–470 iodine value of, 308 labeling of, 448, 458 lecithin for, 319 vs. margarine, 557 milk fat olein for, 60
moisture in, 452 omega fatty acids in, 339 packaging of, 452, 467–469 preparation of, 466–467, 557, 648 SFI curves for, 206, 308 shipment of, 189 soybean oil for, 310 sterols/stanols in, 450, 456 sunflower oil in, 29 Squalene, 10, 43, 45 Sri Lanka, 3, 142 SSL, 318, 380, 382, 383 Stability analysis, 221–224 Stabilizers applications for, 363 for dairy analogs, 426 development of, 351 for emulsions, 312 for icing; See Icing stabilizers for peanut butter, 187, 318 production of, 358–359 SFI profile of, 359 in whipped toppings, 431 Stanols, 11–12, 299, 450, 456 Staphylococcus, 488, 645 Starch, 458 Steaming advantages of, 82 of canola oil, 82 carotenoids and, 81 cholesterol and, 145 control of, 531, 545–546 of corn oil, 82 of cottonseed oil, 20, 348 degumming before, 81, 83, 86 in deodorization, 82, 153–164, 162, 590–592, 594, 596–598 for emulsifiers, 147, 149, 586, 588 FFA and, 79, 81, 154, 221, 566–567 of filter cakes, 109 flavor and, 81, 82, 153 gossypol and, 20 hydrogenation before, 82 hydrolysis and, 79, 156 after interesterification, 150 of lard, 55, 79, 566 lauric oils and, 82 for lecithin, 100 loss during, 594 of milk, 58 of oilseeds, 76 oxidation and, 160, 161 oxidative stability and, 82 of palm oil, 43, 78, 82
Index
of peanut oil, 82 pesticides and, 81 phosphatides and, 160 in physical refining, 82 pressure and, 567 pretreatment before, 80–82 on process flow chart, 75 proteins and, 55 of safflower oil, 82 during shipment, 190, 602 soap and, 160 of soybean oil, 82 sterols and, 11 of sunflower oil, 82 of tallow, 55, 79, 410, 566 TBHQ and, 168 tocols and, 10 troubleshooting, 590–592, 594, 596–598 USDA on, 82 water for, 585, 592 Stearic fatty acid in algal oil, 65 availability of, 267 in butter, 269, 427 in canola oil, 38, 40, 354, 491 cholesterol and, 18, 268 classification of, 7, 18, 268 in cocoa butter, 269, 333 in coconut oil, 49, 427 conversion to oleic, 268 in corn oil, 27 in cottonseed oil; See under Cottonseed oil, stearic fatty acid in crystal habit and, 287 fibrinogen and, 268 in fungal oil, 65 in high-oleic safflower oil, 36, 354, 491 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 33, 354, 413, 491 hydrogenation and, 113, 114, 289, 490, 579 interesterification and, 292, 293, 294 lactic acid and, 318 in lard, 53 lipoproteins and, 11 melting point and, 112, 266, 284 in menhaden oil, 62, 63 in milk fat, 58, 59 in NuSun sunflower oil, 31 oleic reduction to, 113 in olive oil, 42 in palm kernel oil, 51, 427 in palm oil, 44, 46, 48 in peanut oil, 24, 25 positioning of, 7, 112
733
in rapeseed oil, 354 in safflower oil, 34, 354 in shortenings, 412, 413 sodium methylate and, 129 in soybean oil; See under Soybean oil, stearic fatty acid in in sunflower oil, 29, 354 in tallow, 56, 269 Stearidonic fatty acid, 15, 62, 214, 266, 271, 271 Stearin bleaching of, 145 for bread, 381 canola, 215 corn, 215 cottonseed, 45, 138, 296, 337, 368 crystal habit and, 291 iodine values of, 47 lauric, 296, 368 oxidative stability and, 337, 588 palm all-purpose shortening, 368 characteristics, 46 coconut oil blend, 293 crystal habit, 45 fatty acids in, 47, 464 iodine value of, 47, 297 margarine, 296, 462, 464 melting point, 297 softening point, 47 unsaponifiable matter in, 47 palmitic fatty acid and, 47 palm kernel, 297, 311 peanut, 215 phosphorus and, 47 separation processes for, 296 soybean, 138, 215, 296, 297, 391 storage of, 629 tallow, 297 trace metals and, 47, 145 trans fatty acids and, 335 in winterization, 137 Stearine; See also Low-iodine-value hardstocks definition of, 133 in flake form, 358 iodine values of, 144 lauric, 142 meat fat, 349 menhaden, 63, 63 milk fat, 60 oxidation and, 279 palm, 46, 47, 142, 411 separation processes for, 142–143 tallow, 297 in winterization, 133–137, 540
734 Index
Steel in deodorization, 156–157, 160, 628 for emulsifier production, 146 for frying, 642 for margarine plasticization, 178 for olive oil processing, 78 in rendering process, 79 for soybean oil processing, 16 temperature and, 146 Sterculic fatty acid, 22 Steroids, 10 Sterols in animal fats, 9 campesterol, 11 cholesterol; See Cholesterol crystallization and, 11 deodorization and, 155, 161, 590 description of, 10–12 FDA on, 11, 450, 456 fractionation and, 11 GRAS status of, 456 health claims on, 299, 456 in margarine, 450 molecular distillation and, 11 olein and, 47 oxidation of, 10, 628 phytosterols, 11–12 polymerization and, 10, 628 refining and, 11 sitosterol, 11, 12 sources of, 12 steaming and, 11 stigmasterol, 11, 12 in vegetable oils, 9 Stick margarine blends for, 451 consistency of, 452, 467–468, 647 forming/wrapping equipment for, 180, 445, 468 hydrogenation for, 460–461, 460 introduction of, 450 iodine value of, 458 liquid oil in, 460, 461 Mettler dropping point of, 458 moisture loss in, 648 oxidative stability of, 461 packaging of, 460–461 plasticization of, 172, 180, 467–468 polyunsaturated fatty acids in, 451 preparation of, 467–468 process flow chart for, 179 processing of, 647 saturated fatty acids in, 460 SFC profile of, 458
SFI profile of, 304, 310, 458, 460, 647 solidification of, 557 soybean oil for, 310, 460 taste of, 172 temperatures for, 180, 467 trans fatty acids in, 460 Stick shortening, 445 Stigmasterol, 11, 12 Stock recovery, 513 Storage air exposure during, 164–166 of animal fats, 629 of antioxidants, 599 bleaching and, 629 color in, 567 contamination during, 169, 568 of cooking oil, 189 of cottonseed oil, 567, 595 of crude oil, 566–570 enzyme activity in, 563 FFA and, 566–567 of fish oil, 629 fractionation and, 629 hydrolysis during, 169 identification codes for, 514–515, 655–656 interesterification and, 629 light exposure during, 166, 481 of liquid oils, 481 of margarine, 181, 558, 646, 648–649 nitrogen for, 92, 164–165, 481 of olive oil, 43 oxidation in, 164–166, 629 peroxide value in, 606 piping system, 568 procedures for, 568 of salad oil, 189 of seeds, 563 of shortening, 549, 551, 553, 621–622 spill prevention, 568 tanks acid resistant, 88, 146 agitation in, 567–569 cleaning of, 169, 401 deaeration in, 160, 165 design of, 569 heels in, 119, 301 measurement of product in, 569–570 moisture in, 169 nitrogen blanket for, 165, 604 number of, 569 size of, 568, 569 steel for, 16, 569, 628 sweating of, 568 temperature, 603
Index
troubleshooting, 566–569 winterization in, 133, 348, 474 temperature during, 165, 189, 549, 567, 604–608 time in, 166 troubleshooting, 566–570, 604–611, 629 Succinic anhydride, 150 Succinylated glycerides, 150, 316, 380 Sugars for dairy analogs, 426 dimethylpolysiloxane and, 417 in donut coating, 418–419 frying and, 637 lecithin and, 319 margarine and, 558 in mayonnaise, 486 in salad dressing, 488 shortenings and all-purpose, 368–369, 369, 375 bakery frying, 416 cake mix, 371 cookie fillers, 384–385 cookies, 384 frying, 399 icing, 376 in sweetened condensed milk, 435 for whipped toppings, 431 Sugar white cake tests, 245–247 Sulfur in canola oil, 38, 39, 530–531 in corn oil, 530–531, 579 flavor and, 531 in Halphen test, 22 hydrogenation and, 114–115, 531, 578–579 myrosinase and, 76 nickel and, 114, 115, 578 silica and, 96, 105 trans fatty acids and, 114, 578–579 Sulfuric acid, 99, 103 Sulfur oxide, 534, 578 Summary specifications, 508 Sunflower oil AOM stability of, 29, 484 arachidic fatty acid in, 30, 354 in basestocks, 120 Baumé concentration for, 90, 528 behenic fatty acid in, 30, 354 bleaching of, 229 calories from, 480 characteristics of, 28–30, 287 chemical refining of, 29, 90, 96 cholesterol in, 9, 480 CLA from, 275 cloud point of, 29
735
cold test of, 29, 484 color of, 29, 484 consumption of, 5, 5, 6, 475 for cooking oil, 474, 479–480, 552 corn oil and, 28–29 cottonseed oil and, 29 crystal habit of, 30, 287, 584 crystallization of, 584 degumming of, 87 deodorization of, 29, 274 dewaxing of, 30, 479, 584 discussion of, 28–33 dry-method batch refining of, 96 erucic fatty acid in, 30 factors affecting, 30 FFA in, 484 flavor of, 29, 280, 484, 625 gadoleic fatty acid in, 30, 354 in hard butters, 311 hardening of, 290–291 high-oleic; See High-oleic sunflower oil interesterification of, 295, 464 iodine value of, 29, 278, 484 lignoceric fatty acid in, 30 linoleic fatty acid in, 29, 30, 30, 338, 354 linolenic fatty acid in, 29, 30, 354 marketing of, 7 for mayonnaise, 30, 483 melting point of, 29 monounsaturated fatty acids in, 480, 484 myristic fatty acid in, 29, 354 NuSun; See NuSun sunflower oil nutritional labeling on, 480 odor of, 29, 625 oleic fatty acid in, 14, 29, 30, 354 omega fatty acids in, 480, 484 oxidative stability of, 278 palmitic fatty acid in, 29, 354 palmitoleic fatty acid in, 29, 354 peroxide value of, 484 phosphatides in, 9 phosphorus in, 87 polyunsaturated fatty acids in, 480 production of, 4 refining of, 29, 80, 82, 89 refractive index of, 29 for salad oil, 474, 479–480 saponification number of, 29 saturated fatty acids in, 480, 484 SFI profile of, 295 solidification point, 29 soybean oil and, 28 specific gravity of, 29 steaming of, 82
736 Index
stearic fatty acid in, 29, 354 sterols in, 9 titer test of, 29 tocols in, 9, 29 trace metals in, 87 trans fatty acids in, 274, 480, 484 triglyceride composition of, 30 unsaponifiable matter in, 9, 29, 29 wax in, 29, 30, 140, 474, 540, 584 winterization of, 30 yield, 3 Sunflowers, 3, 28, 31, 584 Sunflower seeds, 3, 28, 74–78, 584 Sus scroffa, 53 Sweet doughs, 383, 419 Sweetened condensed milk, 434–435 Sweetened condensed milk analogs, 434–435 Swine, 52, 76; See also Hogs Syria, 3
T Tall oil, 12, 98 Tallow antioxidants for, 57 AOM stability of, 56 arachidic fatty acid in, 57 arachidonic fatty acid in, 338 basestocks and, 302 BHA and, 57 BHT and, 57 bleaching of, 55–56, 103, 531–532 blending of, 57 characteristics of, 56–57 chlorophyll in, 13, 56, 527, 566 cholesterol in, 9, 55, 145, 366 cis fatty acids in, 55 cloud point of, 297 color of, 13, 56, 226, 527, 530, 566 consistency of, 57, 348, 527 consumption of, 6 cottonseed oil and, 145, 153, 410 creaming gas for, 444 crystal habit of, 18, 57, 57, 287 degumming of, 86 deodorization of, 55–56, 527 in diet, 4 eicosatetraenoic fatty acid in, 57 FFA in, 55, 56, 530, 566 filtration of, 55, 527 flavor of, 57, 280, 566, 625
fractionation of, 142, 297, 464 frying and, 400 gadoleic fatty acid in, 57 glycerolysis with, 147–148 hardening of, 291 hexadecadienoic fatty acid in, 56 high heat color rise in, 530 hydrogenation and, 105 interesterification of, 126 iodine value of, 56, 278, 297 lauric fatty acid in, 56 linoleic fatty acid in, 56, 57 linolenic fatty acid in, 57, 57 margaric fatty acid in, 56 margaroleic fatty acid in, 56 melting point of, 126, 127, 183 Mettler dropping point of, 56, 297 moisture in, 530 molecular weight of, 147 myristic fatty acid in, 55, 56, 268 myristoleic fatty acid in, 56 odor of, 57 oleic fatty acid in, 56, 270, 410 oxidation of, 410 oxidative stability of, 56, 278 palmitic fatty acid in, 56, 57, 268 palmitoleic fatty acid in, 56 palm oil and, 45 pentadecanoic fatty acid in, 56 PGEs of, 151 phosphatides in, 9 plasticity of, 57 polymerization of, 410 refining of, 55, 56, 80, 529, 530 refractive index of, 56 rendering of, 52, 55, 566 saponification number of, 56 saturated fatty acids in, 55, 57, 145, 367 SFI profile of, 57, 57 for shortenings all-purpose, 365–367, 366 biscuit, 389 blends, 354 cookie fillers, 386 crackers, 395 crème fillings, 378 Danish pastry, 57 frying, 56, 353, 410, 443 household, 443 icing, 378 U.S. usage, 352 solidification point, 56 source of, 2, 52, 55 soybean oil and, 18, 183
Index
specific gravity of, 56 steaming of, 55, 79, 410, 566 stearic fatty acid in, 56, 269 sterols in, 9 stripped, 145, 335 structure of, 57 titer test of, 56, 207 tocols in, 9 trans fatty acids in, 55, 56–57, 145, 274, 367, 443 triglyceride composition of, 57 unsaponifiable matter in, 9, 56 water washing of, 55 Taste, 217–218, 625; See also Flavor TBHQ; See Tertiary butylhydroquinone Technical service, 495 Tempering of fat flakes, 617 of lard, 387, 611 of liquid margarine, 181, 461 of margarine, 179, 181–185, 461, 558 mechanical, flow chart for, 184 with microwaves, 185 packaging and, 183, 185, 549 in process flow chart, 75 purpose of, 182 quick, 183–185 of shortening all-purpose, 364, 364 for baking, 357 bulk shipments, 355 cake, 551 discussion of, 173, 182–185 flakes, 617 frying, 411 household, 444 icing, 551 liquid, 357, 358, 553 penetration test of, 364 pie crusts, 387 process flow chart for, 175 puff paste, 394 purpose of, 549 of sour cream analogs, 434 for whipped toppings, 430 Tertiary butylhydroquinone (TBHQ) analysis of, 216 antioxidant activity of, 167, 168, 282 applications for, 627 bleaching and, 567 carotene and, 567 Chinese green tea extract and, 627 in cottonseed oil, 555 fish oil and, 63, 627
737
in high-oleic sunflower oil, 413 iron and, 168, 282 lard and, 54 oxidative stability and, 168, 568 pH and, 282 potassium and, 629 proteins and, 282 for shortenings frying, 403–404, 410–411, 413, 421 household, 443 liquid, 375, 553 liquid bread, 382 sodium and, 282, 629 tallow and, 57 temperature and, 168 tocols and, 168, 282 Tetracosahexaenoic fatty acid, 214 Tetracosanoic acid, 27 Tetracosapentaenoic fatty acid, 214 TFA, 99 Thailand, 3 Thermal-heating fluids (THFs), 159 Thermal incineration, 163 Thermophiles, 645 THFs, 159 Thin-layer chromatography (TLC), 216, 217 “Three phasing,” 89 Titanium dioxide, 646 Titer test AOCS on, 207 of canola oil, 37 of coconut oil, 49 of corn oil, 26 of cottonseed oil, 21, 207, 303 description of, 207 in hydrogenation, 119, 534 of lard, 53, 207 of menhaden oil, 62 of milk, 59 of NuSun sunflower oil, 31 of olive oil, 42 of palm kernel oil, 51 of palm oil, 44, 46, 207 of peanut oil, 24, 207 “quick,” 119, 207, 534 of safflower oil, 34 of soybean oil, 17, 122, 207, 303 of sunflower oil, 29 of tallow, 56, 207 TLC, 216, 217 Tobacco budworms, 22 Tocols analysis of, 216–217 in animal fats, 9
738 Index
antioxidant activity of, 9, 167, 281, 282, 600 AOCS on, 217 ascorbic acid and, 167 in bleaching, 102 in canola oil, 9, 38 chemical refining and, 10 Chinese green tea extract and, 627 citric acid and, 167 in coconut oil, 9, 49 color of, 10, 572 in corn oil, 9, 26, 27–28 in cottonseed oil, 9, 21 deodorization and; See under Deodorization, tocols and description of, 9–10 fish oil and, 63, 627 flavor and, 9 fractionation and, 337 free radicals and, 9, 217 for fungal oil, 65, 338 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 32 in high-stability oils, 490 interesterification and, 127, 279, 538 in lard, 9, 53 in margarine, 455 olein and, 47 in olive oil, 9, 42, 42 oxidation and, 9–10, 164, 279, 572, 592 oxidative stability and, 17, 167, 216–217, 279 in palm kernel oil, 9, 51 in palm oil, 9, 44, 44, 46, 48 in peanut oil, 9, 24 peroxide and, 282 pressing temperature and, 77 rancidity and, 216 refining and, 10 in safflower oil, 9, 34, 37 in shortenings, 403 sources of, 9, 10 in soybean oil, 9, 17, 17 steaming and, 10 stearin and, 47 in sunflower oil, 9, 29 TBHQ and, 168, 282 tocopherols; See Tocopherols tocotrienols; See Tocotrienols unsaturation and, 9–10 vitamin E and, 9, 10 Tocopherols analysis of, 216–217 in animal fats, 9 antioxidant activity of, 9, 167, 281, 282, 600 AOCS on, 217 ascorbic acid and, 167
in bleaching, 102 in canola oil, 38 in cereal oils, 9, 10 Chinese green tea extract and, 627 citric acid and, 167 in coconut oil, 49 color and, 572 in corn oil, 9, 26, 27–28 in cottonseed oil, 9, 21 fish oil and, 63, 627 fractionation and, 337 in frying shortening, 403 for fungal oil, 65 in fungal oil, 338 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 32 in high-stability oils, 490 interesterification and, 127, 279, 538 in lard, 53 in margarine, 455 in olive oil, 42, 42 oxidation and, 164, 279, 572, 592 oxidative stability and, 17, 167 in palm kernel oil, 51 in palm oil, 44, 44, 46, 48 in peanut oil, 9, 24 peroxide and, 282 pressing temperature and, 77 in safflower oil, 34 sources of, 9 in soybean oil, 9, 17, 17 in sunflower oil, 29 TBHQ and, 168, 282 types of, 9 unsaturation and, 9–10 in vegetable oils, 9–10, 9 vitamin E and, 10 Tocotrienols in animal fats, 9 antioxidant activity of, 9, 167 in cereal oils, 9, 10 in coconut oil, 49 in palm kernel oil, 51 in palm oil, 44, 44, 46 in safflower oil, 34 sources of, 10 types of, 9 in vegetable oils, 9–10, 9 vitamin E and, 10 Toppings dry sugar-based, 416 glazes; See Glazes icing; See Icing whipped, nondairy, 429–431 Total fatty acid (TFA), 99
Index
Trace metals; See also specific metals analysis for, 201 bleaching and, 13, 83, 104, 144, 530, 542, 629 in canola oil, 87 chelating agents and, 13, 88, 596, 627 classification of, 8 color and, 160 degumming and, 13, 83, 85, 87 deodorization and, 155, 160 description of, 13 emulsifiers and, 585–586 FFA and, 628 in fish oil, 338 flaking and, 618 flavor and, 16, 160, 626 frying and, 256, 400–401, 404, 636, 642 hydrogenation and, 13, 527 lard and, 160 in margarine, 455 in menhaden oil, 62 odor and, 16, 160 oxidation and, 146, 160, 164, 404, 627 oxidative stability and, 13, 283 phospholipids and, 527 raw material analysis of, 527 refining and, 13, 83, 527 silica and, 96, 105 in soybean oil, 16, 18, 87, 565 stearin and, 47, 145 in sunflower oil, 87 in vinegar, 485 Trading rules, 526 Trans fatty acids AOCS on, 214 in basestocks, 120–121, 122 blending and, 335 in butter, 274, 427 in butterfat, 435 in canola oil, 274, 308–310, 480, 484 cholesterol and, 11, 145, 274, 439, 450, 532 cis conversion to, 367 in CLA, 275 in coconut oil, 386, 427, 435 in corn oil, 480, 484 in cottonseed oil, 145, 290, 303, 480, 484, 555 creaming gas and, 172 crystallization and, 459 data on food labels, 298–299, 439, 450–451 definition of, 274 deodorization and, 155, 158, 161, 274, 546, 589–590, 596 in diet, 7, 334, 450
739
Dietary Guidelines for Americans on, 300, 441 enzymatic interesterification and, 131 FDA on, 274, 439 fractionation and, 336–337, 367 FT-NIR analysis for, 212, 214 GMOs and, 14–15, 337 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 413 hydrogenation and, 111–116, 135, 145, 145, 274, 308, 532–533 interesterification and, 124, 131, 133, 293, 335–336, 367 iodine value and, 213, 274, 309 in lard, 367, 388 in margarine, 451, 460, 558 melting points of, 111, 266, 274 in milk, 274 in milk fat, 55, 58, 59 nickel and, 114–116 in NuSun sunflower oil, 31 in oleic oils, 36, 270 oxidation and, 276–277 oxidative stability and, 274, 459 in palm kernel oil, 427 phosphatides and, 533 polyunsaturated fatty acids and, 55, 533 positioning of, 55 reduction of, 334–337 refractive index and, 213 in salad oil, 484, 485 saturated fatty acids and, 367 in shortenings all-purpose, 366–367, 366, 545 cake, 547, 551 cookie fillers, 386 frying, 274, 406, 408–412, 413 household, 442 icing, 547, 551 liquid, 435, 553 pie crust, 388 sources of, 55, 273 in soybean oil; See under Soybean oil, trans fatty acids in sulfur and, 114, 578–579 in sunflower oil, 480, 484 in tallow, 55, 56–57, 145, 274, 367 temperature and, 533 winterization and, 135 Triacetin, 150 Trichloroethylene, 109 Triglyceride replication method, 325, 328 Triglycerides alcoholysis of, 152 in canola oil, 38, 39
740 Index
in coconut oil, 49 in corn oil, 27 in cottonseed oil, 21, 22 definition of, 1 deodorization and, 161 fractionation of, 135 glycerin unit in, 7 from glycerolysis, 147 in high-oleic safflower oil, 36 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 33 hydrogenation and, 111 in lard, 54, 268 medium chain, 50, 143 mixed, 7–8, 123, 215 monoacid, 7 in NuSun sunflower oil, 31 in olive oil, 42, 42 in palm oil, 45, 46, 47 in peanut oil, 24, 25 PGMEs and, 152 phosphorus and, 115 in safflower oil, 34 in soybean oil, 18 SSS; See Trisaturated triglycerides SSU; See Disaturated triglycerides (SSU) structure of, 7–8, 111, 126, 265 in sunflower oil, 30 supercooling properties of, 171–172 SUS; See Disaturated triglycerides (SUS) SUU; See Monosaturated triglycerides (SUU) in tallow, 57 USS, 123 USU, 22 UUS, 22, 294, 463 UUU; See Triunsaturated triglycerides Trisaturated triglycerides (SSS) in canola oil, 38 in coconut oil, 49 in corn oil, 27 in cottonseed oil, 21 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 33 interesterification and; See under Interesterification, trisaturates in in lard, 54 melting point of, 284, 291 in NuSun sunflower oil, 31 in palm oil, 45, 46, 366 plasticity and, 291 purpose of, 123 removal of, 336 SFI profile and, 291 in soft-tub margarines, 462 in soybean oil, 18 in sunflower oil, 30
in tallow, 57 in vegetable oils, 126 in winterization, 135 Triunsaturated triglycerides (UUU) in canola oil, 38 in coconut oil, 49 in corn oil, 27 in cottonseed oil, 21 in high-oleic safflower oil, 36 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 33 in interesterification, 291, 294, 295, 463 in lard, 54 melting point of, 284 in NuSun sunflower oil, 31 in olive oil, 42 in palm oil, 45, 46 in peanut oil, 24 plasticity and, 291 in safflower oil, 34 SFI profile and, 291 in soybean oil, 18 in sunflower oil, 30 in tallow, 57 in winterization, 135 Troubleshooting analytical process for, 561–563, 562 antioxidants, 598–600 bacteria, 644–645 baking shortening, 629–633 blending, 588–589 chemical refining, 571–574 crude oil storage, 566–570 definition of, 561 degumming, 570–571 deodorization, 589–598 dewaxing, 584 emulsifiers, 585–588 flaking, 187 formulations, 627–628 frying shortening, 633–644 handling, 600–621 hydrogenation, 578–580 interesterification, 580–581 liquid shortening, 611–614 off-flavor, 624–627 packaging, 603–611 postbleaching, 581–582 prebleaching, 575–578 quality control lab analyses, 622–624 quality management, 649–656 rendering, 566 shipments, 600–602, 621–622 shortening flakes, 614–621 storage, 604–611, 621–622
Index
741
vacuum drying, 575 vegetable oil extraction, 563–566 water washing, 574–575 winterization, 582–583 TrySyl, 96, 106 Tunisia, 3 Turbidimeter, 200 Turbolizer, 372 Turkey, 3 Turmeric, 483, 487
U Ultrashort-mix caustic refining, 92 Ultraviolet light, 164, 166 United Kingdom, 3, 110 United States (U.S.) antimargarine laws in, 448, 449 on antioxidants, 167 cooking oil usage in, 477 corn oil usage in, 3, 5 cottonseed oil studies in, 22 fat and oil consumption in, 4–7, 5, 6, 475, 475 hydrogenation in, 110 margarine usage in, 451 peanut cultivation in, 23 salad oil usage in, 477 shortening usage in, 352 soybean oil usage in, 5, 5, 15 sunflower studies in, 32 vegetable oils from, 3 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) on antioxidants, 167, 216 on calories, 298 on glass vs. plastic bottles, 481 on margarine, 449, 453 NuSun sunflower oil and, 31 on nutritional labeling, 298 rejection of fats by, 566 soybean studies of, 19 on steaming, 82 Universal product codes (UPCs), 656 Unsaponifiable matter in canola oil, 9, 37 carbohydrates; See Carbohydrates in coconut oil, 9, 49 in corn oil, 9, 26, 27 in cottonseed oil, 9, 20, 21 factors affecting, 80 in high-oleic safflower oil, 36 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 32
in lard, 9, 53 in menhaden oil, 61, 61 in milk, 58, 59 in NuSun sunflower oil, 31 in olive oil, 9, 10, 41, 43 in palm kernel oil, 9, 51 in palm oil, 9, 44, 45, 46, 47 in peanut oil, 9, 23, 24 pesticides; See Pesticides phospholipids; See Phospholipids pigments; See Pigments proteins; See Proteins resins, 8 in safflower oil, 9, 34 in soybean oil, 9, 13, 16–18, 17 squalene, 10, 43, 45 sterols; See Sterols in sunflower oil, 9, 29, 29 in tallow, 9, 56 tocols; See Tocols trace metals; See Trace metals Unsaturated fatty acids bleaching and, 103, 106–107 in canola oil, 478 chlorophyll and, 13, 144 cholesterol and, 11, 269 climate and, 42 in coconut oil, 50 constants for, 214 in corn oil, 27 in cottonseed oil, 22 data on food labels, 298–299, 439 in diet, 337, 476 discussion of, 269–275 expanders and, 76 in fish oil, 63 fruit maturity and, 42 hydrogenation and, 111, 301 interesterification and, 126 isomerization and, 273–274 in liquid oil, 7, 473 melting points of, 111, 269 in menhaden oil, 62, 63 in milk, 58 monounsaturated; See Monounsaturated fatty acids in olive oil, 42 omega designation, 266, 271 oxidation and, 164, 276–277 oxidative stability and, 306, 627 in palm kernel oil, 50, 52 in palm oil, 45, 48 in peanut oil, 25 polymerization of, 406
742 Index
polyunsaturated; See Polyunsaturated fatty acids positioning of, 8, 111, 126, 269, 279 tocopherols and, 9 Unsaturated triglycerides, 22, 123 UPCs, 656 USDA; See United States Department of Agriculture USU, 22 UUU; See Triunsaturated triglycerides
V Vaccenic fatty acid, 55, 56, 266, 273 Vacuum bleaching vs. atmospheric bleaching, 102, 106, 145, 595 chemical refining and, 572 color in, 577 description of, 101–103 flow chart for, 102 hydrolysis and, 102 in postbleaching, 145, 582 temperature and, 106 Vacuum drying, 575 Vacuum oven moisture analysis, 199 Value-added processing, 73–74, 124, 143 Vanadium, 160 Vegetable oils; See also specific types of characteristics of, 7–8, 265 consumption of, 4–7, 5, 6 creaming gas for, 444 deodorization of, 155 extraction processes, 74 factors affecting, 8 heavy duty, 410–411 invention of, 348 sources of, 2, 3 structure of, 7–8, 126, 265 trading rules on, 526–527 troubleshooting extraction, 563–566 yield, 2–3, 3 Very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL), 11 Vietnam, 3 Vinegar, 392, 482–483, 485, 487, 489 Virgin olive oil, 40–41 Visible sources, 6 Vitamin A beta-carotenoids and, 12 fortification with, 339 in margarine, 339, 449, 453, 455–456, 557, 558
oxidation and, 164 palm oil and, 48 squalene and, 10 Vitamin D, 455 Vitamin E antioxidant activity of, 10, 167 in diet, 273 Dietary Guidelines for Americans on, 300 in margarine, 455 oxidation and, 10, 164 in palm oil, 45, 48 tocols and, 9, 10 VLDL, 11 Votator, 350
W Wastewater acidulation of soapstock and, 99 from chemical refining, 95, 97 degumming and, 83 from deodorization, 162–163 from olive paste, 78 phosphoric acid and, 100 from polymerization, 151 silica and, 97 soapstock and, 100 Water activity, 280, 376 Water degumming of canola oil, 37 description of, 84–85 dewaxing and, 139 expanders and, 76 lecithin processing and, 9, 84, 85, 100 phosphatides and, 8–9, 83–85 process flow chart for, 84 purpose of, 84 water level for, 570 Water/lye extraction, 110 Water washing in batch refining, 96 bleaching and, 91 calcium and, 91, 574 in chemical refining, 91, 93 of filter cakes, 109 hydrogenation and, 91 after interesterification, 125, 126, 129 of lard, 55 magnesium and, 574 miscella refining and, 94 oil temperature and, 575
Index
performance assessment, 528 on process flow chart, 75, 93 for proteins, 55 in short-mix method, 92, 93 silica and, 91, 97, 105 soap and, 91, 92, 96, 97, 574 of tallow, 55–56 troubleshooting, 574–575 wastewater disposal after, 97 water amount for, 574–575 water temperature for, 91, 575 Waxes bleaching and, 530 in canola oil, 38, 39, 140, 474, 540, 584 chill test for, 208 in corn oil, 26, 27, 140, 474, 540 definition of, 139, 540 degumming and, 83 in high-oleic safflower oil, 36 in high-oleic sunflower oil, 32 on hulls, 39, 76, 139 mayonnaise and, 30 in NuSun sunflower oil, 31 in olive oil, 42 removal of; See Dewaxing in safflower oil, 34, 140, 474 in sunflower oil, 29, 30, 140, 474, 540, 584 turbidity and, 30 winterization and, 474 Weep test, 250 Weight control, 518, 603, 646, 648 Wesson, David, 153 Wesson color method, 225–226 Wesson deodorization system, 153, 159, 348 Wet-method batch refining, 95, 96 Wet rendering, 61, 79 Wet scrubbers, 163 Whale oil, 348, 349 Whey, 425, 426, 434, 453, 467, 557, 645 Whipped toppings, nondairy, 429–431, 431 Whipped-tub margarine, 172, 181, 450, 469 White layer cake tests, 232, 245–248 Wiley melting point, 203 Winterization applications for, 138 of basestocks, 120 bleaching and, 133, 136 of canola oil, 39, 584 classical process for, 133–134, 137, 474 cold test for, 133, 137–138, 540 control of, 137–138, 540 copper chromite and, 115 of cottonseed oil; See under Cottonseed oil, winterization of
743
crystallization in, 133–139 definition of, 133, 540 factors affecting, 134–136 filtration in, 134, 583 for high-stability oils, 490 hydrogenation and, 135 of menhaden oil, 61, 63 of peanut oil, 23 phosphatides and, 583 purpose of, 141 soap and, 583 solvent, 136–137 of soybean oil, 16, 17, 115, 138 of sunflower oil, 30 troubleshooting, 582–583 waxes and, 474
X Xanthan gum, 458 Xanthaphylls, 12 Xylene, 125
Y Yeast, 64, 337, 455, 558, 645 Yeast-raised dough bread; See Bread Danish; See Danish pastry dimethylpolysiloxane and, 403 emulsifiers for antistaling, 177, 369 conditioning, 318, 369, 380 consistency, 150 donuts, 419 FDA on, 380 plasticity, 308 shelf-life extension, 146, 314 GMOs and, 337 omega-3 fortification for, 338 oxidative stability of, 338 prepared mixes for, 318 raised donuts, 418, 419 retarders for, 389 shortenings for all-purpose, 369, 377 bakery frying, 416–420 consistency, 356
744 Index
lard in, 54 liquid, 357, 363 shelf-life extension, 350, 356 sweet, 383 Yugoslavia, 3
Z Zea mays; See Corn Zebra fish, 15 Zinc, 160
