Tourists with. Typewriters
Tourists with Typewriters Critical Reflections on Contemporary Travel Writing
PATRICK HOL...
356 downloads
1641 Views
10MB Size
Report
This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form
Tourists with. Typewriters
Tourists with Typewriters Critical Reflections on Contemporary Travel Writing
PATRICK HOLLAND AND GRAHAM HUGGAN
ANN ARBOR
The University of Michigan Press
F i r s t p a p e r b a c k e d i t i o n 2000 C o p y r i g h t © b y t h e U n i v e r s i t y o f M i c h i g a n 1998 A l l rights
reserved
Published in the U n i t e d States o fA m e r i c a b y T h e University o fM i c h i g a n Press M a n u f a c t u r e d in the U n i t e d States o f A m e r i c a © Printed o nacid-free p a p e r
2003
2002
2001
2000
5 4 3 2
N o part o fthis publication m a y b e r e p r o d u c e d , stored in a retrieval system, o rtransmitted in a n y
form
or b ya n y m e a n s , electronic, mechanical, o r otherwise, without the written permission o fthe
A CIP catalog record for
publisher.
this book is available from the British Library.
Library o fCongress Cataloging-in-Publication
Data
H o l l a n d , P a t r i c k , 1943T o u r i s t s w i t h typewriters : critical reflections o n c o n t e m p o r a r y travel writing / Patrick H o l l a n d a n d G r a h a m H u g g a n . p. c m . Includes bibliographical
references a n d index.
I S B N 0-472-10973-T ( a c i d - f r e e p a p e r ) 1. T r a v e l e r s ' w r i t i n g s , E n g l i s h — H i s t o r y a n d c r i t i c i s m . 2. E n g l i s h p r o s e l i t e r a t u r e - — 2 0 t h c e n t u r y — H i s t o r y a n d c r i t i c i s m . 3. A m e r i c a n p r o s e l i t e r a t u r e — 2 0 t h c e n t u r y — H i s t o r y a n d c r i t i c i s m . 4. T r a v e l e r s ' w r i t i n g s , A m e r i c a n — H i s t o r y a n d c r i t i c i s m . 5. V o y a g e s a n d t r a v e l s — H i s t o r y — 2 0 t h c e n t u r y — H i s t o r i o g r a p h y . 6. T r a v e l i n l i t e r a t u r e . I . H u g g a n , G r a h a m , 1958-
PR808.T72
H65
II. Title.
1999
820.9'355—ddc2i
98-25512 C I P
I S B N 0-472-08706-1 ( p b k . : alk. paper)
Contents
Preface
vii
Introduction. Travel Writing Today Chapter one. After Empire Chapter two. Zones
i
27
67
Chapter three. Gender and Other Troubles Chapter four. Postmodern Itineraries
157
Postscript. Travel Writing at the Millennium Notes
219
Works Cited Index
255
241
in
197
Preface
T H E R E ISA M O M E N T
Gulliver's Travels (1726),
I N SWIFT'S
O N TRAVEL WRITING, W H E N
ALREADY A
SATIRE
THE E X A S P E R A T E D GULLIVER SAYS H E CAN N O
S T A N D T OL O O K A T A N O T H E R T R A V E L B O O K .
"I THOUGHT,"
LONGER
H E DECLARES
ACIDLY,
THAT WE
WERE ALREADY OVERSTOCKED WITH
COULD NOW
PASS
WHICH
WAS
BOOKS
O F TRAVELS; THAT
NOT EXTRAORDINARY;
WHEREIN
S O M E A U T H O R S LESS C O N S U L T E D TRUTH T H A N THEIR O W N
NOTHING
I
VANITY,
DOUBTED
O R INTEREST,
O R T H E D I V E R S I O N O F I G N O R A N T R E A D E R S . (161-62) T W O
CENTURIES
S O M E — T O O F INTERWAR B E C O M E CLASSIC
LATER, THE
SITUATION
H A V E I M P R O V E D .
PAUL
BRITISH TRAVEL WRITING,
A H A V E N
LEVI-STRAUSS
WORDS
AMAZONIA,
HARDLY
Abroad,
FOR "SECOND-RATE
Tristes Tropiques,
CAN
B ES A I D — A C C O R D I N G
FUSSELL, FOR E X A M P L E , I NHIS COMPLAINS
[LITERARY]
ITR A T H E R M O R E
THAT THE G E N R E
TALENTS"
T H E F R E N C H STRUCTURAL
T O
STUDY
1980
(212).
1955
I N HIS
ANTHROPOLOGIST
HAS
C L A U D E
STRONGLY:
T I B E T , A N D A F R I C A FILL T H E B O O K S H O P S I N T H E F O R M O F T R A V E L
O G U E S , A C C O U N T S O F E X P E D I T I O N S A N D C O L L E C T I O N S O F P H O T O G R A P H S , I N ALL O F W H I C H THE DESIRE TO IMPRESS ISSO D O M I N A N T
AS TO M A K E IT I M P O S S I B L E
FOR T H E R E A D E R T O ASSESS THE V A L U E O F T H E E V I D E N C E P U T
BEFORE
HIM.
I N S T E A D O F H A V I N G HIS CRITICAL F A C U L T I E S S T I M U L A T E D , H E A S K S F O R M O R E SUCH P A B U L U M
A N D S W A L L O W S P R O D I G I O U S Q U A N T I T I E S O F IT.
OF
(17)
T H E S E CRITICISMS, WHILE IRONIC (SWIFT) OR O P E N TO QUESTION (FUSSELL, STRAUSS), ALWAYS
ARE B YN O M E A N S
H A D
A M I X E D
RECEPTION, BEING SEEN B YS O M E
LOUS OR E V E N MORALLY DANGEROUS. B U T I M M U N E ULAR
ALWAYS
WIDELY
HAD
SENSATION
READ
A KNACK,
M O N G E R I N G
G R A L L O( H E I R
FORMS
O F LITERATURE TODAY.
I NA N Y CASE, O F CAPITALIZING MIGHT
A SESSENTIALLY
THE GENRE HAS P R O V E N
TO E V E N THE HARSHEST CRITICISMS, B E C O M I N G
A N D
L E V I -
EXCEPTIONAL. T R A V E L WRITING, A SA GENRE,
B EA N A T H E M A
HAS
FRIVO
REMARKABLY
O N E O F THE M O S T
P O P
TRAVEL
H A V E
WRITERS
O N NEGATIVE
PUBLICITY;
L OT H E I R CRITICS, B U T I T I S I N T E
GENRE.
NONCLHELESS,
SUSPICIONS
PERSIST U ST OI H E WORTHINESS
O F TRAVEL
WRIT-
I N G AS A SERIOUS SUBJECT. A C A D E M I C S CASES
T OM O V E
M A N Y M O S T
B E Y O N D
DISCOURSES O F T H E M
O F DISPLACEMENT
popular
D O E S NOT A I M
T H E
MERCIAL
SUCCESS.
Y E T
M A D E
SPREAD
THE
ALWAYS
TOURISTS
LIKELY
(IRONICALLY?) IN
THIS
SUCCESSFUL
ITS
TRAVEL
ARE
TRAVEL
CONSCIOUS
FOR WHILE
WRIT
O NBEING
TRUE THAT
B E T W E E N
INDIVIDUALISTS,
RECENT
STUDIES
PREJUDICES, A N D
THAT
ADOPT
N I S PORTER'S
SPURR'S
A N D
T H E R O U X , N A I P A U L ,
MORRIS,
HERD.
B E
MIS
ARE
CRITICAL
BEING
ANALYSIS:
WHITE,
M A L E ,
O N E
MIDDLE-
AT THEIR R E A D E R S AS
A P P R O A C H
L O U I S E PRATT'S
A GREATER EXTENT O N C O N T E M P O R A R Y
STILL
VALUES.
" O T H E R E D " — G O O D S . THIS
A CRITICAL
Imperial Eyes, D E N The Rhetoric of Empire,
WERE
TO S O M E EXTENT A REFUGE FOR
A SR E T A I L E R S O F M O S T L Y
A N D
TRAV
WRITERS,
THE VULGAR
TRAVEL NARRATIVES
T R A V E L W R I T I N G CALLS O U T , T H E N , F O R A S U S T A I N E D
O F EXOTIC—CULTURALLY
AGAINST
TRAVEL
COMPLACENT, E V E N NOSTALGICALLY RETROGRADE, MIDDLE-CLASS
CONSUMERS
react
O F TRAVEL WRITING M A Y
READ B Y M O R E P E O P L E THAN EVER, THEY R E M A I N
CLASS, H E T E R O S E X U A L M Y T H S
THE
S O M E O F THE BEST-KNOWN
O F SEPARATING THEMSELVES F R O M
T H A T L O O K S A TTRAVEL WRITERS
M I D
W I T H
B E E N
IF C O N T E M P O R A R Y
O F THE POPULARITY
IT IS CERTAINLY
ARGUABLY
ITSELF—HAS
O F THE OTHERS) OFTEN S E E M TO
THEMSELVES
C O M
THAT IDENTIFY A
PROCESS. T H E M U C H - T O U T E D DISTINCTION
T OPRIDE
DISCUS
SPECTACULAR
B O O K S
THIS
CONTINUING
S K I L L F U L L Y T O ITS W H I M S .
AUDIENCE; BUT
IS S Y M P T O M A T I C — A S
SENSE, TO S P E A K
LEADING;
S O M E T I M E S
TRAVEL WRITING—LIKE
TO A WIDER
THIS D E M O C R A T I Z I N G
TO B E U N D E R T A K E N ;
A ST O S H O W
OR E V E N CHATWIN'S,
THEN P A N D E R
ERS ( A N D , AS WILL B E S E E N , M A N Y
ELERS A N D
INDICATE
M O S T
OR BRYSON'S
O F TOURISM,
AVAILABLE
SO M U C H
WRITERS,
STUDY O F C O N T E M P O R A R Y
O F TRAVEL WRITING ISITSELF A SUBJECT FOR
DLE-CLASS READERSHIP A N D GLOBAL
G A P
SALES FIGURES CERTAINLY
THOSE, LIKE M A Y L E ' S
N IN-DEPTH
P H E N O M E N O N REMAINS
T O FILL T H A T
PRESENCE. T H E POPULARITY SION.
" D I S C O V E R E D " IT, O N L Y I N M O S T
OR TO FOCUS O N T H E C A N O N I Z E D
F R O M EARLIER PERIODS. A
TRAVEL WRITING AS A B O O K
H A V E
IT, PREFERRING EITHER T OINTELLECTUALIZE IT A S S O
EAGER
B O O K
JOINS
T O TRAVEL WRITING
Haunted Journeys,
SEVERAL OTHERS), WHILE
"SPECIALISTS"
( M A R Y D A V I D
FOCUSING
I NTHE GENRE
TO
( C H A T W I N ,
B O W L E S , ETC.). ITS THESIS, U N S U R P R I S I N G L Y
PER
H A P S , ISTHAT TRAVEL WRITING F R E Q U E N T L Y P R O V I D E S A N EFFECTIVE ALIBI F O R T H E PERPETUATION OR REINSTALLMENT O F ETHNOCENTRICALLY SUPERIOR ATTITUDES " O T H E R "
CULTURES,
THOUGH,
B YT H E D E F A M I L I A R I Z I N G
ATTEMPTS,
PEOPLES,
A N D
PLACES. CAPACITIES
THIS
THESIS
O F " O T H E R "
CULTURES
A N D
READER'S
PERCEIVING
CULTURE. TRAVEL
BELONGS
T OA W I D E R
STRUCTURE
AFFILIATIONS A N D
LINKS
WRITING,
A N D
TO N E W
B Y ITS PERCEP
O F THE WRITER'S
A SIS N O W
O F REPRESENTATION WITHIN
C U L T U R E ITSELF
VIM
PLACES
A N D
A C K N O W L E D G E D , W H I C H
CULTURAL
CAN B E A N A L Y Z E D , QUESTIONED,
i' i: i i \ ( !•
TO
COMPLICATED,
O F TRAVEL WRITING, A N D
K E E P I N G P A C E W I T H C H A N G E , T O A D J U S T ITS S I G H T S
T I O N S — B O T H
IS
A N D
REASSESSED.
TRAVEL
H A S RECENTLY E M E R G E D A S A CRUCIAL
CATEGORY FOR T H E DISPLACEMENT ESSENTIALIST
VIEWS
(SAID,
O FN O R M A T I V E
CLIFFORD, C . K A P L A N ) .
" T R A V E L I N G T H E O R Y " IS A S I G N N O D O U B T PHYSICAL
M O V E M E N T ,
MIGRATING
ITSELF B U T O F A RISKS O N C E M O R E
INTELLECTUAL
ELITE. F U R T H E R ,
E L I D I N G T R A V E L writing,
L E C T U A L I Z E D M E T A P H O R S O FM O V E M E N T NONETHELESS POWERFUL M Y T H S T H E HYPERTHEORIZATION
BACK
CONCEPTUALLY F O R
T H A T IS A R G U A B L Y T H EP R O D U C T ,
"WORLDLY"
E M P H A S I Z I N G
INDI
N O TO FTHE TRAVELING
WORLD THEORY
OFTEN HIGHLY
INLEL-
AT THE E X P E N S E O FM O R E PROSAIC B U T
O F PLACE. T H I S B O O K SEEKS TOTURN THE TABLES O F TRAVEL-AS-DISPLACEMENT
WITHOUT
FALLING
O N ITS O P P O S I T E , T H EN A I V E L Y U N T H E O R I Z E D C E L E B R A T I O N O F T R A V E L - A S -
F R E E D O M . A M O R E
IT OCCUPIES
A MIDDLE
G R O U N D , THEN, B E T W E E N TRAVEL WRITING AS
O R LESS E L A B O R A T E T E X T U A L P E R F O R M A N C E ( B U T O R )
NOMICALLY (PRATT).
SANCTIONED
E M P H A S I Z E D
ACTIVITY,
A
CIRCUMSCRIBED
A N D AS A N
MATERIAL
N O M I C
ADVANTAGE,
RHETORICAL T H E
B U T ALSO I N PART TO M O R E
SOPHISTICATED
(WESTERN) CRUDE
ECO
TECHNIQUES O F
CONTROL.
TRAVELER-WRITERS
SCRUTINIZED
HERE
D O N O T ALL SHARE
D E G R E E O FP R I V I L E G E ; N O R D O T H E Y A L LS H A R E T H E S A M E C U L T U R A L SIMILAR
(NEO)IMPERIALIST
VIEWS.
T R A V E L W R I T I N G T H A T IT IS U N I F O R M L Y TRAVEL WRITERS
AS BEING HARMLESS
E V E R D E F I N E D , IS N O T A N A N T I D O T E TIALLY
POSITIVE,
B O O K
SEEKS TO E X A M I N E
CAPACITY
ECO
PRACTICE
H E R E ARE T H E PRIVILEGES THAT ACCRUE T O THE
TRAVELER-WRITER: PRIVILEGES D U E I N PART O F COURSE TO S O M E T I M E S
OR
O F
A S IT O P E N S U P T O
TO ACCOUNT
P E O P L E S , G O O D S , A N D I D E A S . Y E TTHIS WILL T O T H E O R I Z E A L S O
CATES A UTOPIAN I M P U L S E
O N
T H E UBIQUITOUSNESS
T H A T T H EW O R L D ,
R E Q U I R E S ITS C I T I Z E N S
EPISTEMOLOGICAL
VALUES A N D H O M O G E N I Z I N G ,
BOTH
AS WELL
TO FUEL
IT W O U L D
T H E
B A C K G R O U N D
B E AS FOOLISH T O CLAIM
I M P E R I A L I S T I C A S IT W O U L D
ENTERTAINERS. Y E TTRAVEL WRITING,
H O W
O F — P O T E N
NEGATIVE—interference.
AS CONSPICUOUSLY T H E"INTERFERING"
ASPECTS
AMBITIONS
O F
B E TO D E F E N D
T O TRAVEL; IT, T O O , IS A F O R M
T H EEXPANSIONIST
S A M E
T H I S
O F TRAVEL W R I T I N G : ITS O F M O D E R N
TOURISM
A N D , A T ITS B E S T , T O I N T E R V E N E I N A N DC H A L L E N G E R E C E I V E D I D E A S O N C U L T U R A L D I F F E R E N C E . T H E R E A R EO B V I O U S
L A C U N A E H E R E . F O R O N E , W H A T IS T H E A U D I
E N C E , O RC O N S T I T U E N C Y , O FTRAVEL W R I T I N G ? A ING'S B Y N O M E A N S CUE
PERHAPS
F R O M
UNIFORM JANICE
READERSHIP
R A D W A Y ' S
D E T A I L E D S T U D Y O FT R A V E L
N E E D S TO B E WRITTEN,
WORK
C O M P R E H E N S I V E INDUSTRY ANALYSIS O FTHE TRAVEL-WRITING
NESS W O U L D
ALSO B E USEFUL, ASSESSING
POSSIBLE
TO A GREATER EXTENT THAN
here T H EROLE O FTHE " N O N L I C L I O N A L "
G U I D E B O O K
LITIS B O O K ' S
A N D O FTHE
ITINERARY,
BUSI
H A S B E E N
V E H I C L E S THAT S E R V E T H EG L O B A L TOURIST
T H E S E A N D OTHER PROJECTS LIEOUTSIDE
ITS
O N T H ERECEPTION O F LITERARY
ROMANCE. A
OUS NUILLIMCDIA ADVERTISING
WRIT
TAKING
VARI TRADE.
ALTHOUGH T H E
G R O U N D IT C O V E R S W I L L H O P E F U L L Y O P E N U P F U R L h e r A V E N U E S O F E X P L O R A T I O N .
en i i \i i
i
T H I S
B O O K
OFFERS INSTEAD
R E A D E R — B O T H
SPECIALIST
A N
INTRODUCTORY
A N D
N O T — T O
CRITICAL
SURVEY,
C O N T E M P O R A R Y
ALERTING
M O D E S
WRITING, AS WELL AS TO STAPLE E L E M E N T S THAT A R E C O N T I N U O U S FORMS
O F TEXTUAL PRACTICE.
IMPOSSIBLY
FIELD
LARGE O N E — W H I C H
SCIOUSLY
ECLECTIC M E T H O D S .
TENDING
TOWARD
B E I N G
T H E
MIGHT
ACCOUNT
N O N E T H E L E S S , ITS
ENCYCLOPEDISM,
WORRYINGLY
O F T R A V E L W R I T I N G IS,
R A N D O M .
ARE
P E R H A P S
FOR THE
O F
WITH
EARLIER
O F COURSE,
BOOK'S
TO
STRIKE
THE B O O K ,
IN
S O M E
THIS
WHILE
READERS
O N — I T S
SUBJECT. Y E T W H A T SURVEYS SUCH THEY GAIN IN COVERING
THAT,
S O M E
BROAD
IN
CAN
THEMSELVES, ARE INTERLINKED.
TRAVEL WRITING INFLECTED B Y TURAL HISTORY
A N D
SOCIAL
GENRE? H O W
INVENTORY
A D J U S T E D — O R
CLASS?
O F SPATIALIZED
N O T — T O
W H A T
DISCOURSES
IS
TION, OR MIGHT CRITIQUE?
HAS
INSERTING
A I D S ?
H A S
M O D E S
O F CUL
C O N T E M P O
TRAVEL
A N D
P O S T M O D
S E E M
AT
F R O M
A GENRE M U C H
A S IT IS, IT M A K E S TIMES
TO
B E
GIVEN
THAT
IS
THOUGHT?
CULTURAL
D O M I N A
INSTRUMENT
O F SELF-
TO REPETITION, TO C O M E
EROSEXUAL, MIDDLE
OCCUPATIONAL
AS
THE
U P
H A Z A R D
A
FIELD
IN
O F ALL
M A J O R
WHITE,
MALE,
FOCUSES O N RECENT PROSE NARRATIVES
WRITERS
THE GENRE. T H E
K
I'll
I I
A
IT
RELATIVELY
O F THE
OR POETRY) WRITTEN AFTER THE S E C O N D
AFTER THE S I X T I E S — B Y
PART AS SPECIALISTS
MIGHT
C O N S T I T U T E D F O R ITS P U R P O S E S
A N G L O P H O N E ; A N D STILL P R I M A R I L Y
CLASS. T H E B O O K
STUDY.
IT
IMPRESSIONISM
H O W E V E R , IS T O D R A W I N M O S T FIELD:
HAS N O PLACE, ALAS, FOR D R A M A
MOST
TO B E C O M P R E H E N S I V E .
IMPRESSIONISTIC
AN
B O O K S . ITS A I M ,
B E I N G PREDOMINANTLY
N O CLAIM
AS
C O N T E M P O R A R Y WRITERS IN T H E
W A R — M A I N L Y
M A N
E M P I R E ,
NEW?
D E N O U N C E S — M A Y B E UNHISTORICIZED
CRISES
THE GENRE
A L L O F T H E S E Q U E S T I O N S A R E E S S A Y E D , IF H A R D L Y A N S W E R E D , IN THIS
E V E N
THE
T R A V E L W R I T I N G G O F R O M H E R E ; W H A T IS I N S T O R E F O R ITS
F U T U R E ? I S IT P O S S I B L E , I N
INTRODUCTORY
WRIT
WRITING
ITSELF INTO
O F VISION A N D
AGENT O F (WESTERN)
IT R A T H E R B E S E E N A S T R A N S G R E S S I V E , A N
W H E R E CAN
WITH ANYTHING
AN
O F
ITS P R A C T I T I O N E R S
A LEGACY O F IMPERIAL
TRAVEL WRITING BEST S E E N AS
H O W
POSTCOLONIALISM
A G E D IN T H E P R O C E S S TO LIBERATE ITSELF A N D O R IS IT STILL P R I M A R I L Y
PARTICULARS
TECHNOLOGIES A N D THE GLOBAL
O V E R P O P U L A T I O N , SCARCITY,
A N D A N D
IT T A L L Y W I T H T R A V E L
REALITIES,
O F
OVERLAPPING
O F TRAVEL
T A X O N O M Y
CULTURAL M Y T H S ?
A N D A D D R E S S I N G ITSELF TO N E W
O F THE M O M E N T :
A
MIGHT
AS
ISSUES
TRAVEL WRITING,
ARE DEFINITIONS
MIGHT
C O N T E M P O R A R Y
LATE-TWENTIETH-CENTURY ERNISM,
is
G E N D E R A N D INFLUENCED B Y
RARY TRAVEL NARRATIVES L O O K LIKE, A N D H O W ING'S
O F THESE
B E BRIEFLY S K E T C H E D AS FOLLOWS: W H A T
IT B E S E E N A S A D I S T I N C T I V E
B E
G U I D E D
THIS O N E LACK IN A CLEARLY F O C U S E D A R G U M E N T ,
ISSUES M I G H T
AS
SENSE, MIGHT
C O N S I D E R E D G U I L T Y O F A N I M I T A T I V E F A L L A C Y , I N S O F A R A S IT P R O V I D E S A TOUR O F — A M E T A C O M M E N T A R Y
AN
SELF-CON
SELECTION PRINCIPLES,
LIKELY
THE
TRAVEL
I
W H O GENRE
I
IS
(IT
W O R L D
SEE THEMSELVES FOR ITSELF, W H I C H
AS
HET
THE
NOLORI-
OUSLY REFRACTORY TO DEFINITION,
IS N O T
W I D E N E D
(WITH A COUPLE O F DEFENSIBLE EXCEPTIONS) GUIDEBOOK.
literary A N D
T H E
NARRATIVES
ARTIFACTS,
MEDIATING
ETHNOGRAPHY,
SCIOUSNESS N U M B E R
A N D
A N D
AN
B E T W E E N
O F
DISCIPLINES,
HERE INTO
FACT
A N D
THE
FICTION,
WITH
A
A N D
TEMPTATIONS
A N D
SOCIAL
ARE PLACED A N D
P O W E R
CODES.
"REPRESENTATIVE
N E S S " AS FOR THEIR R E L E V A N C E TO CENTRAL A R G U M E N T S , T H E Y RAISE:
SELF-CON
FRAUDULENCE-—A
DISCUSSIONS
ISSUES
AS
AUTOBIOGRAPHY
O F
LITERARY CATEGORIES,
NOVEL
LARGE,
WHIMSICAL
O F TEXTS SELECTED, N O T SO M U C H FOR THEIR
O F THE WIDER
THE
NONFICTIONAL
HERE ARE DESIGNED, B Y
C O M B I N I N G — O F T E N
AWARENESS
O F ACADEMIC
CLOSE READINGS
STUDIED
OUT
OR THE PUTATIVELY
ALONGSIDE
SELF-PERCEPTION,
CULTURAL R E P R E S E N T A T I O N A N D I M A G I N A T I O N , AS WELL AS T H E C H A N G I N G ROLE O F TRAVEL A N D TRAVEL WRITING IN T H E LATE TWENTIETH
CENTURY. TRAVEL WRITING,
O U R V I E W , D E S E R V E S T O D E V E L O P A S A G E N R E ; A F T E R A L L , IT IS A S I G N I F I C A N T A T ITS B E S T , E F F E C T I V E M E D I U M INFORMATION.
T H I S B O O K
THE
DECADES,
LAST
FEW
D E V E L O P M E N T S IN THE T H E
FORM.
OUS,
SPECULATES
FRAMES
D E V E L O P E D
POSSIBILITY
THESE D E V E L O P M E N T S
THE STATUS
DISSEMBLING,
B Y
O F TRAVEL W R I T I N G AS
UNCLEAR.
T E N D TO C O N C E A L AS M U C H
SURES ARE SCREENS FOR CANNILY
O F
HERE
IS
THE
PARTICIPATE
IN
AWARENESS
AWARENESS
T H E TOURIST
TO THEIR PRECURSORS,
T H E
LAUNCHING A
ANXIETIES
INDUSTRY
SEVERAL
REINSTALLING
DISCLO C O N
FEARS. O N E SOURCE O F
FOR TRAVEL
WRITERS
ANXI
OBVIOUSLY
A N O T H E R
EQUALLY OBVIOUSLY,
OFTEN LINKED
THESE C O M P E T I N G
G E N T L E M A N " :
IMPERIAL
IS
THE
H E A R K E N
TO A SENSE O F
NOS
O F IMPERIAL 2. F U R T H E R S
THREAT
FOR N E W
EXPERI
PULLS ARE SEEN THROUGH
A RHETORICAL DEVICE USED, MOSTLY BRITISH
TRAVEL
PAST. T H E
TO THIS M O D E L ,
O F "POSTCOLONIALITY,"
C H A P T E R
THEIR
S E E K I N G SOLACE FOR A TROUBLED PRESENT IN
C O N T E M P O R A R Y
A MYTHICIZED
INSTRUMENT
LIKE
A N D THEIR PERSONAL
VIE WITH THE PLEASURES O F CURIOSITY
ACLS AS A C O U N T E R W E I G H T A G E
A N D
C O N
DISINGENU
NARRATIVES,
THEY C L A I M TO SCORN.
O F TRAVELER-WRITERS,
EYES O F THE "ENGLISH
THE
DOUBTS
PRE
LITERARY/CULTURAL
AS T H E Y REVEAL: THEIR " F A C T U A L "
O F COMPLICITY;
E N C E S O F P L A C E . I N C H A P T E R I,
BY
A
MYTHS.
E N E D CULTURAL ORIGINS,
ICALLY,
TRAVEL
O F BELATEDNESS; FOR TRAVEL WRITERS,
TALGIC CULTURAL
IN
FURTHER
ART O F D I S S I M U L A T I O N ,
STRUCTURED FICTIONS,
FESSIONS M A S K S FOR MOTIVATIONAL
IN
THE
FUTURE.
INTO
DELIBERATELY
BACK
TO
A N D ,
(TRANS)CULTURAL
O F ITSELF AS AT O N C E G E N E R I C A L L Y E L U S I V E A N D E M P I R I C A L L Y
WRITERS,
ETY
AS
T R A V E L WRITING E M E R G E S AS A PRACTICED
SCIOUS
O F
A S S E S S E S T H E E X T E N T T O W H I C H I T has A N D
INTRODUCTION
LIMINARY INQUIRY
FOR THE GLOBAL CIRCULATION
IN
A N D
WRITERS
AS
A
O F
CHAPTER
L O O K I N G AT TRAVEL WRITING'S ITS
IRON
M E A N S
S E C O N D PART O F THE
ASSESSING
THE
STATUS
EFFECTIVENESS AS
AN
CRITIQUE. THIS A R G U M E N T
i-it
lit IK A1
1
THROUGH
\ 1
A DETAILED
STUDY
O F
THE
M Y T H S O W N ,
O F PLACE A N D
" T H E
THROUGH
TROPICS";
LENT M O D E S ORIGINARY
CULTURAL H A V E
EMIGRATION,
O N
O N
BUT
A N D
THE
AUDIENCE
3 IS A N I N Q U I R Y CAPACITY
T H E O U T L E T IT P R O V I D E S
ASSESSING
H O W
O F ITS
A N D
TRANSFORM
(MALE)
A N D
QUEER
4,
FINALLY,
ETH CENTURY HAS
BOTH
THE
STUDY
SHOWS H O W
PERFORMATIVITY.
HALF O F THE CHAPTER
CURRENT
PRIV
WRITING O F
PERCEPTIONS THESE INTO
RIGHT
O F
LINE
U P
TO
THE
PRESENT.
CORNERSTONES O F
REACTED AGAINST
T H E S E
CHAPTERS
TRAVEL
C O N T E M P O TWENTI
ITS O W N
CONDI
WITH
POSTSCRIPT
BOTH
THE
A N D
SO
O N — T H A T
O F AN INFORMATION-SATURATED AT N E W
FORMS
PRINCIPLES
O N
W H I C H
H A V E
SOCIETY.
O F TRAVEL
CERTAIN
T H E
WRITING:
A G E
M O V E
STRANDS
O F THE
FUTURE.
ARE
WRITING
IT A N D
RESPONSIBLE T O U R I S M ARE CURRENTLY S E E K I N G TO R E M O D E L T H E M S E L V E S IN
ANCING
THE WITH
O F POSTCOLONIALISM
TRAVEL WRITING IN THE LATE
HYPERREAL,
ALSO LOOKS
THE ECOLOGICAL
INTERESTS O F A " G R E E N E R "
GAY
CULTURE.
THOSE THAT H A V E AFFILIATED T H E M S E L V E S WITH THE SO-CALLED N E W WITH
CRI
O N TRAVEL WRITING, A N D WITH THE DIFFERENT
WRITING—VIRTUAL,
E V O L V E D TO M E E T THE D E M A N D S
A N D
TRAVEL
THE ROLE O F TRAVEL
FIRST H A L F O F T H E C H A P T E R D E A L S I N P A R T
I M P A C T O F THE ELECTRONIC M E D I A
MENT,
PERCEPTION
TOOL O F FEMINIST
BRINGING
HETEROSEXUAL
R E S P O N D E D TO A N D
O F BELATEDNESS. T H E
TRAVEL
REVISING
THE CONCEPTUAL
RARY W E S T E R N C U L T U R E — A N D
SECOND
POTENTIAL,
G E N D E R
QUEER
A
INTO THE DISCOURSES
P O S T M O D E R N I S M — A R G U A B L Y ,
O F
POLITICS
AGE.
THAT POTENTIALLY REINFORCE M A L E
LICENSE A N D
BRINGS
UNDERTAKES A FURTHER INQUIRY
M O D E S
ADDRESS
SPECIFICALLY W I T H W O M E N ' S
USEFULNESS AS
PERFORMANCE,
THE " Q U E E R I N G " O F (POST)MODERN
TION
N E W
REALITIES—
T H E G E N D E R E D SUBJECT. IT A N A L Y Z E S T H E DISCOURSES
TRAVELER'S TRANSGRESSIVE
C H A P T E R
ABOUT
H O W
T H E M E T A P H O R O F T R A V E L I T S E L F IS D E E P L Y G E N D E R E D ,
SHOT THROUGH WITH PRESUPPOSITIONS
LIBERATION
TOPOI PREVA
TO (TRANS)NATIONAL
O F THE INFORMATION
ILEGE. T H E S E C O N D HALF O F THE CHAPTER E X A M I N E S IN RECONSTITUTING
AT
A I D S — A N D
FOR SEXUAL PLAY A N D
THE LIMITS
TIQUE, A N D SHOWING
LOOKS
THEMSELVES TO M O D E R N
T H E FIRST H A L F O F T H E C H A P T E R D E A L S M O R E WRITING,
ALSO
WELL ATTUNED
ANALYZE
A N D
THESE ARE THE
INTO TRAVEL WRITING'S TRANSGRESSIVE
TO
THEIR
O R I E N T "
T O P O S L E N D S ITSELF TO
CHAPTER
GLOBAL CIRCUITRY
ARTICULATE
" T H E
TO ATAVISTIC STEREOTYPES
IMPERIALISM, TRANSCULTURATION,
TO A N
ITS
WRITERS
" T H E ARCTIC":
EVOLVED, ADJUSTING
TO THE C O M P L E X C H A P T E R
A N D
A N D
IN THIS C H A P T E R . E A C H
STATES;
M E D I A
THEMSELVES
FOCUSING
S E A S "
TRAVEL
(MIS)ENCOUNTERS.
O F IMPERIALIST NOSTALGIA
MYTHOLOGIES
A N D
CURRENT
STAGED
" T H E S O U T H
PLACED U N D E R SCRUTINY
ING
W H I C H
REEXPRESS OTHER,
FOLLOWED
O N
LOOKS BACK
THE
B Y
A
BRIEF
KNIFE-EDGE
REFLECTIVE POSTSCRIPT.
O F THE
AT T H E R E C E N T H I S T O R Y
XII
I'll
I I'M
1
N E W
MILLENNIUM,
O F TRAVEL WRITING,
BAL THIS G A U G -
ing its dominant patterns, and l o o k s forward to the directions that the genre might take in the future. Tourists with Typewriters offers a series o f reflections on its subject that, while largely unpolemical, are in the spirit o f critique. It deviates, for example, from the c o m m o n l y held view that travel writing upholds freedom, arguing instead that it can be seen—though not exclusively— as an imperialist discourse through which dominant cultures (white, male, E u r o - A m e r i c a n , middle-class) seek to ingratiate themselves, often at others' expense. T r a v e l writing, though, has another side, and this too will be studied. F o r travel writers, as unreliable documenters o f other people and cultures, have always had a say in the critical reassessment o f their o w n . Travel writing, after all, is a valuable medium o f estrangement, even if it operates all too frequently through familiar stereotypes and myths. This b o o k examines the strategies by which contemporary travel writers attempt to persuade us that the worlds—often mythical ones—they describe are real. But it also explores the w a y s in which these writers address our o w n world, giving us access to cultural regions that, though "discovered," remain myste rious to us, or m a k i n g strange those very territories, and the values and attitudes w e ascribe to them, that w e might imagine to be most famil iar, the closest to our o w n experience. (It should be clear from this that (he b o o k is addressed primarily to a Western readership, although from a perspective that is often critical o f the pretensions o f "the West.") T r a v e l writing, in this last sense, can be seen as a useful vehicle o I'cultural self-perception; as a barometer for changing views on other ("foreign," "non-Western") cultures; and as a trigger for the infor mational circuits that tap us in to the wider world. T r a v e l writing, traditionally seen as affording a license for escapism, m a y yet show its readers the limits o f their ambition and remind them o f their responsi bilities. This b o o k , then, m a k e s a pitch for the ethical value o f travel writ ing, even as it demonstrates that travel narratives are unreliable in the extreme. T h e b o o k ' s title—deliberately glib—sets out to capture the contradictions that are inherent in this most hybrid and unassimilable of literary genres. A s will be seen, m a n y current travel writers like to sec themselves as anachronistic, taking rhetorical advantage o f their own imagined obsolescence. (Few, o f course, are prepared to view themselves as being tourists, even though the advantages they reap here are all too palpable, all loo real.) But "tourists with typewriters,"
WHILE
A NA P P E A L I N G ( S E L F - ) D E S I G N A T I O N , I S P O T E N T I A L L Y M I S L E A D I N G .
WRITERS,
A SC U L T U R A L C O M M E N T A T O R S ,
RHETORICAL A N D
SLEIGHT O F H A N D ,
U P T OD A T E . T H I S
CONTRADICTIONS, I A L — A N D
ITS
THEY M A Y
B O O K
G A U G I N G
A I M S
THE
T H A N K THE M A N Y ALSO
B O O K .
A M O N G
L A R R Y
BUELL,
M I C H A E L
H O L C O M B E ,
C O U L I N G , T O N Y
EPRAIL, D E R E K
D O R O T H Y
K A P U R ,
H O L L A N D ,
A L J A KOOISTRA, PATRICIA
Y O U N G S ,
G W E N
A N D
W H O
THE
V I V I E N N E
G O R R A ,
M A C D O N A L D ,
BOLD,
D E N T O N ,
L E A N N
TIMES
A P P A R E N T MATER
O F M I C H I G A N PRESS, W H O
A TTHE UNIVERSITY
IDEAS A N D ENTHUSIASM
H O L L A N D ,
L A K E ,
CAMILLE
P E N N E E ,
(POST)COLONIALISM,
WAS
SUBMITTED
PANIC,
COLLABORATIVE
D I A N A
R O B E R T
B R Y D O N ,
D O U V A L D Z I , FLEET, I A N
HARRISON,
MELISSA
M A L C O L M
IMRIE,
LIZARRIBAR,
SHELLEY
M A R T I N
ROBERTS,
T I M
TO O U R READERS A T THE
A N D
TO D O R O T H Y
HADFIELD
W H O
F I N A L L Y TO ALL O U R S T U D E N T S , O F Y E A R S P A S T O F G U E L P H A N D
W E R E CRUCIAL
A N D
H A R V A R D
THE PRODUCTION
and the Production
H U G G A N ' S O F E X O T I C
of Space,
TO REPRINT MATERIAL
I'll I I M
WRITING
" T R A V E L
WRIT
S P A C E , "
W H I C H
Colonialism,
Post-
I
TO THE EDITORS A N D
HERE.
A N D
W H O S E
EDITED B Y D A N I E L C L A Y T O N
D E R E K G R E G O R Y FOR BLACKWELL (OXFORD). T H A N K S
X I V
UNIVERSITY,
THROUGHOUT THE READING A N D
I N A DIFFERENT F O R M TO THE COLLECTION
LISHER FOR THEIR PERMISSION
LIKE T O
SUGGESTED C H A N G E S THAT W E R E ESSEN
O F THE B O O K ,
PROCESS. PART O F CHAPTER I APPEARS A S G R A H A M ING,
P R O V E N
EW O U L D
CHARITINI
FIELDS,
M I C H A E L
D O N N A
W
P L E A S U R E , O F THIS
G R E G O R Y , J A M E S
S U Z Y
MERIVALE,
ITS I N D E X . T H A N K S
colonialism
THE
H A V E ENTERED INTO THE
W H E E L E R . O U R SPECIAL THANKS
TIAL T O T H E C U R R E N T F O R M A T
PRESENT,
B E H I N D O F THESE
SUBJECT, HAS
O F A V E X E D ITINERARY.
THESE ARE THE FOLLOWING: CHRISTINE SCOTT
EASTCOTT,
C O M P I L E D
TRAVEL
PLACES; B YA
ATTENTION-GRABBING
I N K E E P I N G W I T H ITS
H E L P E D T OH E I G H T E N
G O L D R I N G ,
UNIVERSITY
O F ITS
P E O P L E A L O N G THE W A Y
J O N A T H O N
A K A S H
A P P E A R A SB O T H
TO NEGOTIATE S O M E
IRONIES
Tourists with Typewriters,
H A V E
O F TRADING
TITLE.
OVER THE YEARS TO B E S O M E T H I N G
BUT
ARE CAPABLE
A N D P U B
Introduction Travel Writing Today
"I d o not expect to see m a n y travel b o o k s in the near future," wrote Bvelyn W a u g h at the end o f the Second W o r l d W a r : " N e v e r again . . . shall w e land on foreign soil with letter o f credit and p a s s p o r t . . . and feel the world wide open to u s " (When the Going Was Good 11). B u t W a u g h , as it turned out, was seriously underestimating the resilience o f travelers, and o f the w o r l d w i d e network—the business—that contin ues to support their enterprise. T r a v e l and its literary by-product, the I ravel b o o k , have a habit of justifying their continuation by anticipat ing their own decline; and if the postwar traveler lives, as M a r k C o c k e r believes, "in fear o f modernity's encroachment" (259), then that fear might well result in the publication o f another b o o k . Travel writing today is, like its subject, very m u c h a g o i n g concern. Sales figures are i>ood, with one or t w o best-sellers. Recent examples here include Peter Mayle's nostalgic memoir A Year in Provence (1989), which has sold over a million copies, been translated into seventeen languages, and been converted into a popular British T V serial; Paul T h e r o u x ' s sar donic travel narratives, several o f which have featured on the New York Times best-sellers' lists, m a k i n g their author one o f the bestk n o w n contemporary literary figures in A m e r i c a ; and the highly suc cessful R a n d o m H o u s e Vintage Departures series, which boasts a b o u t sixty current titles, and which has enjoyed a steady expansion since its inception in the mid-1980s. T h e shelves in the travel section o f the big bookstores are well stocked; top newspapers in the United K i n g d o m , I Inilcd States, and elsewhere feature thriving travel supplements; spe cialist magazines such as Granta (in Britain) and Conde Nast Traveler (in the United Slates) are reporting increased sales, while National Geo graphic, in 11 flurry o f publicity, has celebrated its hundredth year;
TRAVEL VEHICLES ( T V
P R O G R A M S A N D COMMERCIALS,
LIFERATE I N T H E VISUAL
M E D I A ;
INTERNET A N D W H A T M A R T I N (WORLD
LITERATURE,
INTEREST, STUDIES
TOO, SUCH
CINEMA,
IS GROWING,
WITH
WORLD
THE
MUSIC,
M A R Y
A G E
L O U I S E
O F GLOBALIZATION
THE CURRENT B O O M
A N D
A C A D E M I C CRITICAL
IMPLICATIONS
O F INTELLECTUAL A N D ( E D W A R D
[1983]; J A M E S C L I F F O R D , " T R A V E L I N G S O N E T A L . , E D S . , Travellers' Tales [1994]).
SAID,
" T R A V E L I N G
[1992];
CULTURES"
BILITY TO PREVIOUSLY A N D
THE
WORKS.
R O B E R T
I NTRAVEL WRITING? O N E O F T H E R E A S O N S IS O B V I
R E M O T E PARTS
O F THE WORLD
UNPRECEDENTED E X P A N S I O N
O W I N G
ACCESSI
TO C H E A P E R
TRAVEL
O F WORLDWIDE
TRANSPORTATION
NET
O P P O S E D TO THIS
O N E :
GLOBALIZING PROCESSES THAT H A V E
ACCESSIBLE
T H E
B E F O R E —
O F IDEAS, GOODS, PEOPLES; A N D AN INCREASING
A N O T H E R REASON, H O W E V E R , ISDIAMETRICALLY
FOR THOSE S A M E M O R E
O F
CULTURAL
O U S : T H E R E I SA G R E A T E R D E G R E E O F M O B I L I T Y I N T H E W O R L D T H A N E V E R A GREATER M O V E M E N T
THE
INDUSTRIES"
(1991), E R I C L E E D ' S P R A T T ' S Imperial Eyes
THE METAPHORICAL
T H E O R Y "
W H Y
1
PRO
THROUGH
O F INFLUENTIAL
Journeys
TRAVEL A SA NA N A L O G U E FOR DIFFERENT F O R M S I N THE
ETC.);
PUBLICATION
Haunted
PORTER'S
The Mind of the Traveler (1991), A N D (1992), A N D T H E A T T E M P T T O A N A L Y Z E DISPLACEMENT
VIDEOS, ETC.)
R O B E R T S CALLS T H E " G L O B A L C U L T U R E
WORLD
AS D E N N I S
FILMS,
SURROGATE TRAVEL IS AVAILABLE
TRAVEL
H A V E
ALSO ARGUABLY
LITERATURE
I N D U S T R Y — A N D
LITERARY-MINDED ELOGUES
A N D
GROWING
TRAVEL NARRATIVES
G U I D E B O O K S — H A S
M A D E
I N THIS
A N D
B E E N
FEARS O F H O M O G E N I Z A T I O N ,
M O R E QUICK
H E L P E D M A K E
IT LESS EXCITING, SHOULD
WORLD
DIVERSE.
B EI N C L U D E D
BOTH
INFORMATION-ORIENTED
TRAV
T OC A S H
P R O M O T I N G
ITS
I N O N WESTERNERS'
PRODUCTS
ALTERNATIVES TO THE SANITIZED SPECTACLES O F M A S S TOURISM; THE WORLD
THE
LESS
I S STILL H E T E R O G E N E O U S , U N F A T H O M A B L E ,
A S THRILLING
AS E V I D E N C E
BEWILDERING;
THAT
A S P R O O F
THAT T H E SPIRIT O F A D V E N T U R E C A N H O L D O F F T H E THREAT O F E X H A U S T I O N . I N THIS SENSE,
THE
TRIBUTING GLOBAL
TRAVEL TO,
(LITERATURE)
exotic:
A N E W
CULTURAL DIVERSITY
UNIVERSAL MARKET
BUSINESS
A CELEBRATION
THAT
IT ISN O
O F M A S S TOURISM—THAT
TINCTION. UNLIKE
3
SURPRISE TO
FIND,
T H E
DISTINCTION ARE
O N ,
O F THE M O D E R N
I S , O FC O U R S E ,
THEIR
D E A N STRATED
INSATIABLE
M A C C A N N E L L
CURIOSITY AND,
CONVINCINGLY,
2
M O R E
THIS
SPECTACLE
A B O U T
HIGHLY
VISITORS,
HAS
B E E N
TRAVEL
TRAVELER/TOURIST SPECIOUS:
MOTIVATED
OTHER COUNTRIES
RECENTLY, J A M E S
DISTINCTION
O F
SUCH A SPEC
O F C O N T E M P O R A R Y
LAZY DESIRE FOR INSTANT ENTERTAINMENT BUT B Y THE H A R D - W O N ISFY
CON
2
O F THE CONVENTIONAL
"NONEXPLOITATIVE"
WHILE
A G E N C Y — T H E
DOES M O S T TO M A K E
POSSIBLE.
T H E N , I NA N U M B E R
A HEATED DEFENSE
TOURISTS,
CAPITALIZED
FLIES I N T H E F A C E O F T H E V E R Y
T A C L E , A N D ITS L I T E R A R Y R E P R E S E N T A T I O N ,
NARRATIVES,
HAS
A N D
B U Z A R D
DIS
TRAVELERS, NOT
B Y THE
BATTLE TO
SAT
PEOPLES. A S H A V E
D E M O N
M A N I P U L A T E D
B Y THE
TOURISTS W I T H T Y P E W R I T E R S
tourist industry to serve its o w n commercial ends. F o r M a c C a n n e l l , travelers' seemingly plaintive need to dissociate themselves from "mere" tourists functions as a strategy o f self-exemption, whereby they displace their guilt for interfering with, and adversely changing, the cultures through which they travel onto tourists; see themselves as c o n tributing toward the well-being o f those cultures rather than as exploit ing them for their o w n benefit; and view themselves as open-minded inquirers rather than as pleasure-seeking guests. T h e tourist industry profits from this rhetoric o f m o r a l superiority ( M a c C a n n e l l ) , using it to lure the adventure-minded traveler onto an alternative beaten track (Buzard). T o see travel as merely another form o f tourism is to recog nize the increasing commodification o f place; w h a t travel writers offer in this context is not an insight into the "real," but a countercommodified version o f w h a t they take to be reality. T h e critical potential of travel writing—its capacity to expose and attack the invasive prac tices o f mass tourism—is further diminished when it is recognized, not as an out-and-out opponent o f tourism, but as a valuable adjunct to it. The armchair curiosity that Paul Fussell, a m o n g others, has seen as an inducement to read travel narratives should by n o means be thought o f as replacing the urge to travel; rather, travel writing sells while also helping to sell holidays. N o r are travel writers necessarily averse to tak ing their cut. Is it too cynical to suggest that m a n y o f t o d a y ' s travel writers are motivated less by the universal imperative o f cultural inquiry than they are b y the far more urgent need for another c o m m i s sion? Travel writing still remains lucrative only for a handful o f recog nized writers; m a n y others ply a more moderate trade in largely parttime journalism. Nonetheless, contemporary travel writers, whatever their status or their institutional affiliation, are continuing to provide sterling service to tourism—about to become the world's largest indus4
I ry even w h e n they might imagine themselves to be its most strident adversaries. Clearly, not all travel writers are alike (nor, for that matter, are all tourists). T o see contemporary travel writers merely as touristic scribes—as latter-day tourists with typewriters—is to fail to recognize their efforts to reexplore regions o f the w o r l d that, although "discov ered," remain unfamiliar, or to revive interest in familiar places, n o w seen from a fresh, informed perspective. It is also to underestimate the unsettling effects produced by travel writing: its ability to jolt its readers out o f complacent beliefs and altitudes, and its challenge to prevailing stereotypes and cultural myths of place. Finally, it is to miss the crucial ii
i i n i i > i ii • i l o t
3
R O L E P L A Y E D B YT R A V E L
NARRATIVES
CULTURAL S U B J E C T — A
ROLE M A D E
OF POSTMODERNITY,
BUT
O N E
I NINTERROGATING
THE "STABILITY"
M O R E CONSPICUOUS,
THAT
IS EVIDENT
OF
THE
TO B E SURE, I NT H E
A G E
THROUGHOUT
THE
HISTORY
TRAVEL WRITING, W H I C H SHOWS
A T E N D E N C Y TO BLUR THE LINES B E T W E E N
A N D "FALSE," DOCUMENTATION
A N D FABRICATION,
" O T H E R N E S S " — B O T H CONFIRM
BIOLOGICAL
A N D QUESTION THE POSITION
TRAVEL WRITING CAN POTENTIAL: HIS/HER CODES
A N D
I NALLOWING
O W N
SOCIETY,
ARGUABLY THE WRITER
O F B E H A V I O R — T O USEFULNESS
THEMSELVES
O F THE FREEDOMS
CODED--
THAT
O F THE INVESTIGATING
SUBJECT.
TO FLOUT CONVENTIONS
SCRUTINY.
THAT EXIST
O F TRAVEL
O F M A L E
NARRATIVES, M U C H TIME
A
EXPLORATION; A N D
CHARTING
neoimperial
AS
M A R Y
O F
L O U I S E
RECENTLY,
TO POSTCOLONIAL
a POSTIMPERIAL
TRAVEL
PRATT,
INDERPAL
SARA
MILLS,
D A V I D
W H O S E
ANALYZED SPURR,
THAT
THROUGH
WHICH
QUESTION
H U M A N S
O F W H O
" W E "
M A R K
AT
THE
A N D
S A M E
T I M
Y O U N G S ,
A NUNCRITICAL
I M P E
IMPERIALIST
B Y CRITICS
SUCH A S
AND,
VIEW
O F M O B I L I T Y THAT
TRAVEL WRITING, LIKE
C E L E B R A T E THIS
F R E E D O M " SUCH
ALLOWS
ARE
MOST
O F
TRAVEL
THAT HAS
DOMINANCE.
THE WORLD
TO C O N Q U E R .
WAS
RIPE
SUGNET, A M O N G
THIS
BEGS
TO CLAIM
ITS
THE 5
TO WRITE.
I N D E E D ,
F R E E D O M A T OTHERS'
THAN
C O C K E R
SUPRE-
TO SEE ITAS A N SAYS
MARTIN
A P L E T H O R A O F A D V E N T U R E TALES
THEIR
TWENTIETH-CENTURY
NOTIONS
IWCNIIELH-CENLURY
I ' . l'i ' W H I T l!HS
THAT THAT
COUNTERPARTS
LO THEIR PRIVILEGE, BUT
O T H E R S , has A R G U E D , M A N Y
I O U 1(1,SIS W i l l i
O F
M E D I U M
BENEFICIARIES?
THEY REINFORCED PREVAILING
LARGE, M O R E SENSITIVE
I
IS A
BETRAYS A N ATTITUDE O F CULTURAL
WERE A M O N G
O F E M P I R E :
BE, BY A N D
(260).
FREEDOM'S
I NTHE NINETEENTH CENTURY,
ENERGIZED THE M Y T H
JOURNEYS
.. . TRAVEL ISO N E
TO TRAVEL, A N D
L E D CRITICS LESS C H A R I T A B L E
G R E E N , TRAVEL NARRATIVES
"IN
THE
STUDY
I SN O T T H E F R E E D O M O F ALL: I TI S T H E
T H E M
TRAVEL ITSELF, I S A P T
E X P E N S E ; IN SO D O I N G , IT S O M E T I M E S
O F IMPERIAL
REMARKS,
ARE:
C L E A R L Y , T H E F R E E D O M O F TRAVEL WRITERS PRIVILEGE
C O C K E R
F R E E D O M , A N D THE TRAVEL B O O K
W H O
A
TRAVEL
L A N D S C A P E O F W H A T IS AS
THE NEWNESS O F THE WORLD.
THE GREATEST D O O R S TO H U M A N
MIGHT
O W N
F R E E D O M N E E D S TO B E ADJUSTED TO
BRITISH TRAVEL WRITING,
W E D I S C O V E R ALL O V E R A G A I N
AGENT
WRITERS,
T O RESIST. T H E P A T R I A R C H A L
G R E W A L — S U G G E S T
THE AVAIL
R E A L I T I E S O F C L A S S , R A C E , A N D G E N D E R P R I V I L E G E . I NH I S R E C E N T
O F M O D E R N
M A T I S M
W H O
SURROUNDING
AGE, DEMONSTRATE
WRITING—EXPERTLY
W R I T I N G AS A C E L E B R A T I O N O F H U M A N M O D E R N
RIGID
ARE
B E T W E E N TRAVEL WRITING A N D THE V E R Y (CULTURAL)
RIALIST A T T I T U D E S I TO F T E N C L A I M S UNDERTONES
HERE
I N ORDER TO CELEBRATE THEIR
C H A N G E S I NT H E G E O P O L I T I C A L
THE COMPLICITY
WITHIN
OFTEN
WRITERS,
I N D E P E N D E N C E , AS WELL AS TO REASSESS T H E P O W E R F U L M Y T H S HISTORY
TRANSGRESSIVE
E X A M P L E S
O F TRAVEL WRITING TO W O M E N
O F
ALTERNATELY
THOSE CONVENTIONS—THOSE
C L O S E CRITICAL
CONTINUING
A N D TO INVESTIGATE F O R M S
CULTURALLY
B E S E E N , T H E N , AS H A V I N G
IT SUBJECTS
O F
"TRUE"
as C H A R L E S TRAVEL
WRIT-
ers still arrogate the rights o f mobility and representation that once accrued to Empire. In a postcolonial world, they thus fight a rearguard action, concealing beneath their patronizing language and their persis tent cultural nostalgia a thinly disguised desire to resurrect the imper ial past. Sugnet, in his diatribe against the British magazine Granta, pulls n o punches: its travel articles are designed to "restore the lost dream o f empire in a w a y that allows y o u n g - f o g y readers to pretend that they're still living in the nineteenth century. . . . A curious fusion of the 1880s and the 1980s is what keeps all those Granta travel writers up in the air, afloat over various parts o f the globe, their luggage filled with portable shards o f colonialist discourse" (85). Sugnet's argument, in the nature o f polemics, is boisterously hyperbolic; its effect is reduced by his failure to account for c o n t e m p o rary travel writing's ubiquitous self-irony: its awareness o f its o w n belatedness (a point to which w e shall return). Nonetheless, Sugnet's frontal attack reminds us that travel narratives have proved remark ably effective over time in (re)producing the "foreign" world as an object o f Western k n o w l e d g e (Pratt 5). A t best, says Dennis Porter, [.ravel narratives "[have] been an effort to o v e r c o m e cultural distance through a protracted act o f understanding. A t worst, [they have] been a vehicle for the expression of Eurocentric conceit or racist intoler ance" (3). In either case, travel writing tends to reinforce the authority of its predominantly metropolitan readership; its world o f wonders is, in one sense, a w o r l d already k n o w n — o n e made available to readers "back h o m e " through the comforting reiteration o f familiar exotic myths. (Exoticism is precisely the mechanism for this process o f retrieval, a means by which the "otherness" o f the foreign w o r l d can be assimilated, and its threatening difference defused by taking on a lamiliar cast.) It is here that travel writing, for all its transgressive polenlial and vaunted claims to see the world anew, looks suspiciously conformist. " H o m e , " after all, is the frame o f reference for most con temporary travel writers (even when it is precisely the category o f " h o m e " that their writing calls in question). Their experiences o f I ravel are predicated on the possibility o f return; their adventure trips .no round trips. A n d their v o c a b u l a r y frequently reflects the security o f .1 s h a r e d culture; in this sense many travel writers, in spite o f their cullivuleil eccentricities and assertive individualism, operate within a readily identifiable semantic field. Travel writing in the late twentieth century continues to be haunted by the specter o f cliche: its catalogs o f anomalies lire often recorded in remarkably similar terms. T h e same 6
I N T H O D t n
1 1
I1 1
>,
WORDS
A N D PHRASES
CROP
S T E R E O T Y P E S , T H ES A M E TO
RECOGNIZE
ABOUT THAT
FACES.
C O N T E M P O R A R Y
BELIES THEIR A P P A R E N T
N O R THE
T H E S A M E
M A N Y
U P AGAIN
IS T H EM U T U A L WRITERS
FLESH"
U N D E R
I N D E E D ,
L E I G H
TRAVEL WRITERS—PARTICULARLY
BACKSLAPPING SCRUTINY
T OI C O N O C L A S M
CONFINED
HERE,
N E W B Y
H O U S E
MORRIS
I N G R E E C E ) ;
TRINIDADIAN
N A I P A U L
E D W A R D I A N
E N G L I S H M A N .
B U M P S
INTO
S E E M S
ANACHRONISTIC
T OW I S H
IDEALS O F(ENGLISH)
O FT H E WRITERS W H O S E W O R K
THAT,
OFTEN PARODIED,
BRITISH
O N E S —
A N D ADVENTURE.
R A B A N
A M O N G " I N T H E
I N
( A N DALSO
T H EC H R O N I C A L L Y
T OREINCARNATE
E V E N
CLUBBABILITY
T OCROSS-QUOTATION:
E V E N
B E H I N D M A N Y T H O U G H
M Y T H S A N D
ENCOUNTERS THESIGER
COLLABORATES WITH T H E R O U X O NPATAGONIA
F E R M O R ' S
T H E
T H E S A M E
THERE IS A GENTEEL
C O M M I T M E N T
I N T H EWILDS O FNURISTAN;
C H A T W I N
A N D AGAIN,
LITERARY ANALOGIES. O N E BEGINS AFTER A WHILE
CAIRO;
BORROWS DISPLACED
HIMSELF
AS A
POST-
GENTLEMANLINESS ARE AT W O R K
IS F E A T U R E D I N THIS B O O K :
IDEALS
A R E STILL L I K E L Y T O A T T E S T T O T H E T R A V E L E R ' S
H O N E S T Y A N DC O U R A G E , H I S S E N S E O F F A I R P L A Y . ( T H I S M I G H T A C C O U N T F O R T H E O U T R A G E S O M E O F THE WRITERS EXPRESS W H E N ERS' DECEPTIONS.)
B U T IT IS T H ECAPACITY
THEY ARE CONFRONTED WITH
OTH
F O RS E L F - D E P R E C A T I O N T H A T
MOST
M A R K S T H E G E N T L E M A N ' S P R O G R E S S : A N I N D I C A T I O N N O TO N L Y T H A T H E D O E S N ' T T A K E H I M S E L F T O O SERIOUSLY, B U TTHAT W E S H O U L D N ' T T A K E H I M T O O EITHER.
T H EI M P U L S E
T OTRIVIALIZE
WRITING, F R O M THE C A M P FOONERY
O F CAHILL
IS B E H I N D
A N D O ' H A N L O N .
T H E FOPPISHNESS
THAT
THEIR
ATTIMES,
OFTEN DUBIOUS
P E O P L E A N D C U L T U R E S A R E O N L Y T H EO P I N I O N S T H E NAIF;
O FS O M E
LIGHT O F THEIR M I S A D V E N T U R E S ,
FUL ALIBI FOR THEIR CULTURAL GAFFES A N D , A REMINDER
TRAVEL
PROVIDES A USE
P R O N O U N C E M E N T S
O FA N E N T H U S I A S T I C
ABOUT
AMATEUR.
TRAVELER-WRITER, I N THIS CONTEXT, CONTRIVES T O M A S Q U E R A D E A SA HIS/HER NARRATIVE
SUPERFICIALITY.
B O N A FIDE
BUF
O F THESE
THEIR ARROGANCE; IT ALSO
IS C O N T E N T T OB A S K I N A N A T M O S P H E R E
FAUX
O FC H E E R F U L
( T H E R E A L I T Y I S , O F C O U R S E , M O R E C O M P L E X ; A N DI T I S N O S U R
PRISE T OFIND THAT SEVERAL O F THESE W R I T E R S — O ' H A N L O N ,
FOR E X A M P L E — A R E
SCIENTISTS.)
OBVIOUSLY, THE
SERIOUSLY
C O N T E M P O R A R Y
A F F E C T A T I O N S O F C H A T W I N A N DB A R T H E S T O T H E
WRITERS, W H OT E N D T O M A K E
AFFORDS
M U C H
N O TALLTRAVEL NARRATIVES
G E N T L E M A N
NONETHELESS, INSTRUCTIVE.
TRAVELER
THIS
FIGURE,
IS
O N EO F M A N Y
A N D T H E IRONY
WITH
F O RT H ECULT O F G E N T L E M A N L I N E S S
P H O N E TRAVEL WRITING IS B O T H RECOGNITION
ONLY
A R EG I V E N
THAT
A THROWBACK
T OSUCH POSSIBLE
WHICH
I N C O N T E M P O R A R Y
THIS E R A , A N D T H EV A L U E S F O R W H I C H
A N AWARENESS
(I
FHNL
PERSONAS.
IT IS TREATED, IS A N G L O
T OA N O T H E R E R A A N D A N I R O N I C IT STANDS,
L O N G G O N E . S E L F - P A R O D Y , I N THIS C O N T E X T , D E M O N S T R A T E S BELNLEDNESS-
INDULGENCE:
inevitably
REMINDS
loniurrs w i i i i TVi'i'wWTWKs
A R E N O W
THE AWARENESS O F e o n t e m p o r a r y
7
travel writers o f their o w n limitations. It is an a x i o m o f recent travel writing that writers offer tribute to their predecessors, h o m a g e often paid in adulatory terms. C o n t e m p o r a r y travel writers thus c o n sciously place themselves in a tradition—a tradition as m u c h literary as historically based. N o r need these predecessors, literary or histori cal, h a v e actually traveled; for travel writers are fascinated, rather, by the imaginative texture o f place—the process by w h i c h places and their inhabitants are shaped and reshaped by (literary) m y t h . In p a y ing their statutory respects to previous writers and travelers, c o n t e m porary travel writers realize that their o w n endeavors have c o m e t o o late; it rests for them to emulate w h a t others before them have achieved. Hence their weakness for self-parody: their tendency to view themselves as pale imitations o f their distinguished forebears. H o w ever, the consideration o f their o w n insufficiencies is less likely to cause them anxiety than it is to cause amusement. Self-irony also affords a useful strategy o f self-protection—as if the writer, in reveal ing
his/her faults, might be relieved o f social responsibilities. S o m e
travel writers, hiding behind the m a s k o f escapist explorer-adventur ers, or lurching from one disaster to the next for the delectation o f (heir readers, are reluctant to be held accountable for their g a u c h e but "inoffensive" actions. Others, q u i c k to moralize a b o u t the ills o f other cultures, exempt themselves from complicity in the cultural processes they describe. O n e strategy o f self-exemption is to claim a cool detach ment—as if travel writers were neutral observers o f the places they visit. A n o t h e r strategy is for the writer to designate himself or herself as an eccentric—as if eccentricity excused mistakes usually based on cultural ignorance. T h e m o s t frequent strategy, h o w e v e r , is to assume a variety o f disguises. In their self-presentation, travel writers arc often extremely elusive, shifting roles with the same facility as they move from place to place. N o w the p e d a g o g u e , now the clown; n o w the traveler, n o w (even) the tourist. T h e y m a n a g e , thus, to benefit from alternative temporary privileges, one m o m e n t taking a d v a n t a g e of an h o n o r a r y insider's k n o w l e d g e , the next taking refuge in a for eigner's convenient incomprehension. This manipulation o f roles is one o f the skills of travel writing; to condemn the travel writer for one form or other o f artful dodgery is to forget that the genre has a long history—a license—of entertaining fraud. T h e ambiguity surrounding travel narratives
the uncertainty,
at given m o m e n t s , o f whether the writer is telling us the truth—is part of their a p p e a l ; t h e stories they tell are no less compelling if they h a p -
P E N
T OB EM E N D A C I O U S .
I T IS WORTH
R E M E M B E R I N G ,
WRITING, H O W E V E R ENTERTAINING, ISHARDLY APPARENT INNOCUOUSNESS
E R N " ) CULTURES. T VEHICLE
HARMLESS,
A N D ITSC H A R M I N G L Y
A SERIES O F P O W E R F U L L Y DISTORTING M Y T H S
THOUGH,
F O RCULTURAL
PREJUDICE
TRAVEL
A N DTHAT B E H I N D ITS
ANECDOTAL OBSERVATIONS
ABOUT
OTHER (OFTEN,
IS T OOVERLOOK
A SM E R E L Y A
T H E GENRE'S
SIGNIFICANT
O F C U L T U R A L C R I T I Q U E . ( T R A V E L is, A F T E R A L L , A T L E A S T
POTENTIALLY A LEARNING EXPERIENCE: A M E A N S
O F T E S T I N G , A N DT H E N
REVISING,
THE TRAVELER'S CULTURAL EXPECTATIONS.) N O N E T H E L E S S , TRAVEL WRITING S O M E
O FT H E P R O B L E M S
TOURISTS,
ALTHOUGH
DESCRIBED
LIES
" N O N - W E S T
OS E E TRAVEL W R I T I N G I N ITS C U R R E N T F O R M A T
I M P A C T AS A N INSTRUMENT
THAT
O FITS P O O R
RELATION,
TOURISM.
SHARES
TRAVELERS
are
O F A N I N D E P E N D E N T B R E E D , A N D T H ETHRILLS A N D SPILLS
I N TRAVEL NARRATIVES,
I FD I F F E R E N T I N K I N D
O R G A N I Z E D P L E A S U R E S O FT H E M U C H - D E R I D E D THEIR READERS WITH THE M A N U F A C T U R E D DALS, O FS U R R O G A T E T O U R I S M .
A N DSPIRIT F R O M T H E
" P A C K A G E
T R I P . " STILL
W O N D E R S , N O T T OM E N T I O N
T R A V E L WRITING, LIKE TOURISM,
PROVIDE THE
SCAN
GENERATES NOS
T A L G I A F O R O T H E R T I M E S A N D P L A C E S , E V E N A S I TR E C O G N I Z E S T H A T T H E Y M A Y B Y N O W
HAVE
TENDS
"LOST"
THEIR
ROMANTIC
AURA.
8
C O N T E M P O R A R Y
T OB ES E L F - C O N S C I O U S — S E L F - I R O N I C — A B O U T
SUCH
TRAVEL
WRITING
LOSSES: IT IS B O T H
N O S T A L G I C A N D , A T ITS B E S T , A W A R E O F T H E D E C E P T I V E N E S S O F N O S T A L G I A . Y E T I F THE
TOURIST
RHETORIC
INDUSTRY
O FL O S T
CYNICALLY
DRESSES
I N N O C E N C E — A S
ITSEXPANSIONIST
" O T H E R "
PLACES
DESIGNS
I N A
A R E DESTROYED,
OTHER
" O T H E R S " D U L Y E M E R G E T O T A K E T H E I R P L A C E — T H E T R A V E L W R I T E R I SM O R E A SHOCKED WITNESS THEIR
READERS, PARTICIPATE
R E C T L Y , T OB O T H
I N GLOBAL
TOURISM:
ITS B E N E F I T S A N D ITS W O R S T
AFTER ALL, I N B E L I E V I N G THAT B O O K
THAN
T O THIS S E L F - P E R P E T U A T I N G PROCESS. T R A V E L WRITERS, A N D THEY
A CERTAIN A P P R O A C H
IS N OLONGER POSSIBLE:
CONTRIBUTE,
E X C E S S E S . S OW A U G H
T H E O N ETHAT
I F INDI IS RIGHT,
T OT R A V E L A N D T H E T R A V E L
CRIES
FOUL
AT TOURISM A N D
E X P E C T S , I NT U R N , T O G O U N P U N I S H E D .
FACTUAL
B U T
WHAT,
EXACTLY,
is
A TRAVEL
FICTIONS
B O O K ?
B YWHICH
CRITERIA
J U D G E D ? W H O QUALIFIES A SA TRAVEL WRITER? A N D M O R E MERITS B E
INCLUSION
SAID, IS HARD
STRADDLES
I N A S T U D Y O FTHIS K I N D ? T R A V E L WRITING, I TN E E D T OD E F I N E , N O TLEAST B E C A U S E
CATEGORIES
A N DDISCIPLINES.
PICARESQUE ADVENTURE TO PHILOSOPHICAL ECOLOGICAL
SHOULD
PARABLE,
A N D SPIRITUAL
QUEST. T H E Y
M M I H I M •, W I T H
BORROW
I YI'UwMITHt
THAT
R U N FROM C O M M E N T A R Y ,
FREELY
SCIENCE, often
HARDLY
GENRE
NARRATIVES
TREATISE, POLITICAL
tory, G E O G R A P H Y , A N T H R O P O L O G Y , A N D social
8
ITIS A HYBRID
TRAVEL
IT B E
SPECIFICALLY, W H O
FROM
his
D E M O N S ! r a t -
ing great erudition, but without seeing fit to respect the rules that g o v ern conventional scholarship. Irredeemably opinionated, travel writers avail themselves o f the several licenses that are granted t o a form that freely mixes fact and fable, anecdote and analysis. N o t least o f these i s the license to exaggerate, or even to invent: as Percy A d a m s says in his entertaining survey, travel writers are under n o obligation to tell their readers the truth; instead, they are often practiced liars "infested with I h e itch to tell wonderful stories" or, in some cases, "inflicted with the desire to tell lies ' o f a darker c o m p l e x i o n ' " (5). N o t all travel writers, o f course, are liars; a m o n g the contemporary figures, Peter Matthiessen a n d Barry L o p e z w o u l d b e upset at the allegation, and even tricksters, such as (the late) Bruce C h a t w i n , w o u l d defend their selective use o f t a c t s . Travel writing i s best seen, then, as a "mediation between fact a n d fiction" (Fussell), referring to actual people, places, and events as I h e writer encounters them, b u t freely interspersing these with stories I h a t are often o f dubious provenance or derive from mythical or ficti t i o u s sources. But what, again, is a travel b o o k ? Perhaps it is better to begin b y defining w h a t it is not. Travel b o o k s , says Paul Fussell, referring t o the fully fashioned literary w o r k s that are the objects o f his study, are to b e distinguished initially from g u i d e b o o k s , which are not autobiographical and are not sustained by a narrative exploit ing the devices of fiction. A guide book is addressed to those who plan to follow the traveler, doing what he has done, but more selec tively. A travel book, at its purest, is addressed to those who do not plan to follow the traveler at all, but who require the exotic anom alies, wonders, and scandals of the literary form romance which their own place or time cannot entirely supply. (203) distinction i s a useful one, although it begs important quesF o r example, cannot certain travel b o o k s b e used, precisely, as nldebooks i s it not possible to combine the aesthetic and ideological unctions o f the "travel b o o k " with the pragmatic function o f the r . o i i l c " ? ( O n a recent visit to Patagonia, one o f the present authors " l i e e d several fellow travelers using C h a t w i n ' s In Patagonia as a a i d e , Clearly, t h e " e x o t i c anomalies" provided in plenty b y C h a t w i n ' s "iii'i'tilivc h a i l n o t prevented i t s r e a d e r s from checking out the terrain 1 0 1 ' themselves.) A s a r g u e d e a r l i e r , t r a v e l b o o k s d o not necessarily act id " U i h s l i t u l e s for a c t u a l t r a v e l ; o n t h e c o n t r a r y , I h e y may often funct l n i i u s i t s catalyzing agents. I iiHselfs
I M H S .
INTRDItlii
1 Ii i M
•)
FUSSELL'S NEXT DISTINCTION PROVES TOB E EQUALLY PROBLEMATIC: B O O K S , H EC L A I M S I NA VALIANT A T T E M P T T O R E A C H A PROVISIONAL are
a sub-species o f m e m o i r in w h i c h t h e autobiographical
narrative
arises f r o m t h e speaker's e n c o u n t e r w i t h distant o r u n f a m i l i a r and
(203)
FUSSELL'S F O R M U L A T I O N ISA D M I R A B L Y N E A T , B U TITSUFFERS A G A I N PLIFICATION.
B O T H
"REFERENCE
T O ACTUALITY"
NOVELS
A N D R O M A N C E S WITHOUT
C L A I M I N G "LITERAL VALIDITY." INFLUENTIAL
THESIS
C A N M A K E
NECESSARILY
ROMANCES,
ACTIVE O R
O NTHE ATTEMPT BOTH T O
9
H E REFERS, V I A F R Y E ,
DISTINGUISHING
HERE
T O TRAVEL
B E T W E E N
O FC O M I C M I S A D V E N T U R E A N DT H E P A S T O R A L M O D E
(206, 209-10).
A N D ELEGIAC REVERIE
(CONTEMPORARY)
THROUGH A REWORKING IRONIC
LESS
T H E RISE O F T H E N O V E L , I N D E E D — I F I A N W A T T ' S
FUSSELL C O M E S CLOSER W H E N
M A N Y
JUXTAPOSITION
O F CONTEMPLATION
T H E S E M O D E S ARE CERTAINLY RELEVANTT O
TRAVEL NARRATIVES, O FT H E " O R I G I N A L "
O F THEIR
NARRATIVES
T H E PICARESQUE
USUAL
A SIS THEIR D I S P L A C E M E N T ,
LITERARY F O R M S THAN
C O M P O N E N T S .
I N A
C O N T E M P O R A R Y
In
T H E R E A D E R IS C O N T I N U A L L Y SHUTTLED B E T W E E N ALTERNATIVE M O D E S
REGISTERS, S O THAT T H E H Y B R I D W O R K
LESS
THROUGH A N
TRAVEL NARRATIVE LIKE, FOR INSTANCE, C H A T W I N ' S A F O R E M E N T I O N E D
gonia,
SIM
I S T O B EA C C E P T E D — D E P E N D E D O N T H E R E A R R A N G E M E N T
(RE)PRESENT A N D T O SATIRIZE " R E C O R D E D FACTS."
DISPLACED
F R O M
FREQUENT, DETAILED
S E E M I N G
A N D EMBELLISHMENT O F "AUTHENTIC" INFORMATION:
M O D E
data,
in which the narrative—unlike that in a novel o r A r o m a n c e —
claims literal validity b y c o n s t a n t reference t o actuality.
AS
TRAVEL
DEFINITION,
THAT ACCUMULATES F R O M THESE
Pata A N D
VARIOUS
STYLISTIC F R A G M E N T S STARTS T O R E S E M B L E , O X Y M O R O N I C A L L Y , A C O N T E M P L A T I V E P I C A R E S Q U E E L E G Y O RA R O L L I C K I N G P A S T O R A L A D V E N T U R E . T H E
FORMAL
A P P R O A C H
T O TRAVEL WRITING RISKS R U N N I N G
A G R O U N D O N
THESE DEFINITIONAL INCONSISTENCIES, A N D O NTHE S E E M I N G DETERMINATION O F T H E G E N R E T O FLY I N T H E F A C E O F T R A D I T I O N A L APPROACH, SPACE
O F DISCURSIVE
E X A M P L E S TION":
PERHAPS,
O FW H A T
IS THAT
WHICH
CONFLICT.
TRAVEL
H A Y D E N W H I T E
THEY CLAIM VALIDITY—OR
BOUNDARIES.
SEES TRAVEL WRITING NARRATIVES,
CALLS "FICTIONS
M A K E
A
M O R E
FRUITFUL
A SO C C U P Y I N G
I N THIS
A
CONTEXT, A R E
O FFACTUAL R E P R E S E N T A
A SI FT O C L A I M I T — B Y
REFERRING T O
A C T U A L E V E N T S A N D P L A C E S , B U TT H E N A S S I M I L A T E T H O S E E V E N T S A N D P L A C E S T O A
HIGHLY
PERSONAL
VISION.
1 0
TRAVEL
B E T W E E N THE WRITERS' C O M P U L S I O N OFTEN REPRESSED DESIRE T O M A K E T I O N O F IT. ( T A K E INDIA
WRITING
THUS
CHARTS
T H E TENSION
TOREPORT THE WORLD THEY SEE A N D
THEIR
THE WORLD C O N F O R M TO THEIR P R E C O N C E P
T H E O B S E R V A T I O N S , D I S C U S S E D I N T H I S B O O K , O FN A I P A U L I N
O R IYER I N J A P A N ,
OBSERVATIONS
THAT
MIRACULOUSLY
C O N F O R M
T O A
CULTURAL " E S S E N C E " E A C H WRITER B E L I E V E S H E H A SD I S C O V E R E D . I N THIS S E N S E ,
10
roiJRISTS W i I II T Y I ' H W K I T I i l K S
IHERE ISSOMETHING
SOCRATIC
ABOUT
T H EI N Q U I R I E S
WRITERS: T H E Y S E E K AFTER " T R U T H S " T H E Y I M A G I N E
M A D E
B YM A N Y
TRAVEL
THEY ALREADY H A V E I N THEIR
POSSESSION.) T H E
SUBJECTIVITY
O FT R A V E L W R I T I N G M I G H T B E S E E N , I N THIS S E N S E , A S A
F O R M O F WILLFUL I N T E R F E R E N C E : ITI SN O T THAT TRAVEL WRITERS T R Y T O VEIL PERSONAL
INTERPRETATION
B U T , O N T H ECONTRARY,
IHEIR PUTATIVE
REPORTAGE. L I K E
I S M — A N O T H E R
M E M B E R
FORMS
THEY I M P O S E
O FINVESTIGATIVE
STATUS B E T W E E N SUBJECTIVE I N Q U I R Y
I N HIS B O O K
O N NAIPAUL'S
" A SEMI-ETHNOGRAPHIC,
AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL, ACTERISTIC WAY
ABOUT
U P THEIR OPINIONS
TRAVEL WRITING,
T H ESLIPPAGE
THE WRITER'S
OUSLY M E N T I O N E D ,
ANALYTIC
EMOTIONALLY TANGLED M O D E " NAIPAUL'S
IT NEGOTIATES
M A X I M I Z E
DISTANCED,
B E T W E E N
DISCURSIVE
R O B
O FTRAVEL WRITERS'
A N D " A N CHAR
T ON I X O N ,
IS T H E
I N ORDER T O
H E N C E THE PARADOX,
A M A T E U R
PREVI
EXPERTISE: THEY M A Y
BACK
B Y A P P E A L I N G I N S O M E M A N N E R O RO T H E R T O T H E R I G O R S O F SCIENCE TO C R A M P
THEIR
STYLE.
N I X O N ' S EDNESS
M O D E "
THESE T W O M O D E S
SCIENCE, B U T T H E Y U S U A L L Y FALL SHORT O FA L L O W I N G PERSONAL
N I X O N
ALTERNATES
( 1 5 ) . W H A T I SM O S T
ACCORDING
AUTHORITY.
WRITING
A N D OBJECTIVE
TRAVEL WRITING,
SIMILARLY IDENTIFIES TRAVEL LITERATURE AS A P O L Y V A L E N T G E N R E THAT BETWEEN
THEIR IT O N
JOURNAL
O FTHE GENRE'S E X T E N D E D F A M I L Y — T R A V E L
ENJOYS A N INTERMEDIARY DOCUMENTATION.
CERTAIN
THAT
O B S E R V A T I O N RAISES T H E M O R E SPECIFIC Q U E S T I O N O F T H E
O FTRAVEL WRITING T O E T H N O G R A P H Y .
O T H E R S , H A SN O T E D , T R A V E L E R S A N D A N T H R O P O L O G I S T S H A V E M O R E I N T H A N I SU S U A L L Y
INDEBT
A SVALERIE W H E E L E R ,
A M O N G C O M M O N
SUPPOSED:
B o t h traveler a n d a n t h r o p o l o g i s t a r estrangers w h o deliver t h e exotic to a n a u d i e n c e unlikely t o f o l l o w t h e m t o t h eplace they h a v e
visited,
but
neither
likely perhaps t o follow
their explorations
o f them. In
c a s e is t h e a c c o u n t w r i t t e n f o r t h e p e o p l e o r p l a c e s e x p e r i e n c e d , b u t
f o r p e r s o n a n d p r o f e s s i o n . (52) IN
THIS
CONTEXT,
EMPHASIS. LIONALLY
TRAVEL
WRITING
11
A N D E T H N O G R A P H Y
DIFFER PRIMARILY I N
TRAVEL WRITING ISSELF-CONSCIOUSLY AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL, ANECDOTAL,
A N D ( I N S O M E
CASES)
DELIBERATELY
INTEN-
ETHNOCENTRIC,
WHEREAS E T H N O G R A P H Y H A ST E N D E D UNTIL RECENTLY T O PLAY D O W N THE SONALITY
O F ITS A U T H O R ,
TION, A N D T O CRITIQUE DESCRIPTION TIME
T O SUBSTITUTE
SCIENTIFIC
ETHNOCENTRIC ASSUMPTIONS
O F"FOREIGN CULTURES" WHILE
O FI T S O W N P R E J U D I C E S A N D B I A S E S ,
WRITING
A N D E T H N O G R A P H Y
ANTHROPOLOGISTS
FOR ANECDOTAL
REMAIN,
H A V E SOMETIMES
T H ES T U D Y A N D
AWARE
AT THE
B U TDISTINCTIONS B E T W E E N
A T BEST,
M A D E
B E H I N D
REMAINING
PROBLEMATIC;
CONCERTED ATTEMPTS
I N 1 H o n o r 1TON
N
PER
INFORMA
A N D
S A M E TRAVEL WHILE
TO DISSOCI-
ATE THEMSELVES F R O M TRAVELERS
TRAVELERS—LEVI-STRAUSS
M A Y B EEQUALLY
ANTHROPOLOGISTS.
1 2
K E E N
T OSEE,
ARS)
U N A S H A M E D
audience
A N D
HERE, H O W E V E R , TIONS
POSITIONS
T H E M
APPEARS
TRAVELER
THE
E T H N O G R A P H Y
N U M
TENDS
LARGELY
TENDS T O D O W N P L A Y CLAIMING
THEY
AUTHORITY
T OA D V E R T I S E
ATTEMPTS
BOTH
DIFFERENCES ALLOW
SUBJECTS.
STATUS"
O F THE
A R EM E R E L Y
I N , " T O" G O
THESE PRIVILEGES
O C C U P Y
OVER THEIR
THAT
ISSUE
DISTINC
VISIT—THAT
T H E''SPECIAL
T O" M O V E
INSTEAD
CENTRAL
N O EASY
B Y T H EE C O N O M I C
OUTSIDER—PRIVILEGES
OUTSIDER
T H E
A G A I N ,
A N DT H E S O C I E T I E S
A N D
C O N
N A T I V E " —
T O OBVIATE
THE
T OR E L Y O N A D I F F E R E N T K I N D O F
C O N F E R R E D B Y THE P R O V E N TRUTHS O F SCIENCE.
T H E S E GENERALIZATIONS CAN O F COURSE B EQ U E S T I O N E D ; FOR TRAVEL I N G , T OR E P E A T , I SG E N E R I C A L L Y E L U S I V E , A S U N W I L L I N G D O C U M E N T A R Y
VERACITY
IT P U R P O R T S T O P R O V I D E A D O C U M E N T WHILE
USING
T H E M
N O T ALL O F T H E M
EXCESS.
INSOFAR AS
O F , O RR E P O R T O N , O T H E R P E O P L E S
A SA BACKDROP
Q U E S T . N O T ALL T R A V E L N A R R A T I V E S ,
WRIT
T OG I V E U P ITSC L A I M S T O
A SI T I S T O W A I V E I T S L I C E N S E T O R H E T O R I C A L
P E R H A P S IT IS BEST T O S E E TRAVEL W R I T I N G AS / W E W J O E T H N O G R A P H I C ,
CULTURES
ARE
SCHOL
A L A Y READERSHIP;
A N DA N T H R O P O L O G I S T S
A N OFTEN UNWARRANTED
O FPERSONALITY,
AUTHORITY,
WRITING
(TRAVEL WRITERS
FOR
T O B E O N E O FP O W E R .
A S A PRIVILEGED W H E N
IS WRITTEN
TRAVEL WRITERS
WRITING
method
SPECIALIZED AUDIENCE).
O F P O W E R — G R A N T E D
TRAVEL
FIRMED
WRITING
THEIR O W NSOCIETIES
T OE S T A B L I S H
W H I L E
OR B E T W E E N TRAVEL
ALTHOUGH THERE ARE A
DIFFERENCES I N
A T A M O R E
C A NB E M A D E :
B E T W E E N
B YFUSSELL
DILETTANTES; ETHNOGRAPHERS ARE RESEARCH
(TRAVEL
E T H N O G R A P H Y A I M S
CULT
E T H N O G R A P H Y ,
O F GENERALLY IDENTIFIABLE
BRICOLEURS,
E X A M P L E —
THEMSELVES A S
FICTION, T H E R E IS N OP R E S C R I P T I V E B A S I S F O R D I F F E R E N T I A T I N G
B E T W E E N TRAVEL WRITING A N D BER
BILL,
A SW I T H T H E T E N U O U S DISTINCTIONS M A D E
B E T W E E N THE TRAVEL B O O K A N D THE G U I D E B O O K , A N D (ROMANCE)
ISA F A M O U S
O R E V E N
OBVIOUSLY,
F O R T H EA U T H O R ' S
PERSONAL
ARE O F THE QUESTING
ASSIMILATE THEIR ENCOUNTERS T OTHE DICTATES
A N D
VARIETY;
O F PERSONAL
E X P E R I E N C E . N O N E T H E L E S S , I NT R A V E L N A R R A T I V E S , A S I N O T H E R F O R M S O F A U T O BIOGRAPHICAL ATTEMPT DESIRE,
O FTHE
DESIRE,
IS S E C O N D A R Y
T OA C H I E V E
ARE USUALLY AWARE O F THE DISCREPANCY A N D THE HAPHAZARDNESS
OBSERVATIONS
QUITE LITERALLY—WITH THEY
RULES A N DPRINCIPLES
T H E
T O T H E
SELF-UNDERSTANDING.
IS P E R H A P S T H E K E Y W O R D H E R E , F O R E V E N T H E M O S T E A R N E S T TRAVEL
CAL O B S E R V A T I O N S THOSE
UNDERLYING
O R THE M O C K E R Y
M O C K E R Y WRITERS
W R I T I N G , T H E S E L F I S W R I T L A R G E I N ITS A L I E N S U R R O U N D I N G S .
T OF I N D
K N O W
ARE DERIVED.
T R A V E L WRITERS,
CHARLATANISM,
THESE T O B E DUBIOUS.
routtr; i i
B E T W E E N THEIR
PHILOSOPHI
O F THE EXPERIENCE F R O M I N THIS RESPECT,
CLAIMING CERTAIN "TRUTHS" E V E N T H E
HISTORY
O FT R A V E L W R I T I N G ,
I TVI-CWRITBR8
WHICH FLIRT— W H E N UNSUR-
prisingly, reveals a propensity for hoaxes: either pseudointellectual "insights" that are embarrassingly believed in, or tall tales that mas querade as miraculous events. M a n y c o n t e m p o r a r y travel narratives follow in this profitable vein, exhibiting picayune " m e n t o r s " w h o s e wisdom is dispensed like so m u c h snake oil ( C h a t w i n , N a i p a u l ) , or declaring " m o m e n t o u s " happenings that taper off into sheepish anti climax ( N e w b y , O ' H a n l o n ) . S o m e hoaxes are revealed; others, left uncertain, b e c o m e the focus o f suspicion. (The M y l o d o n skin in In Patagonia
provides
an
object
lesson.
Allegedly
discovered
by
C h a t w i n ' s cousin in South A m e r i c a , it n o w p r o u d l y ornaments his grandmother's dining r o o m in southern England. T h e subject o f innu merable tall tales, the M y l o d o n skin is o f doubtful authenticity; it seems much m o r e than likely that it is an utter fake. Its value as a c o l lector's item remains, however, undiminished, its dubious origins merely serving as a catalyst for C h a t w i n ' s already vivid imagination 11-3,188-92].) The
value o f the M y l o d o n skin to a storyteller like C h a t w i n
increases e x p o n e n t i a l l y w i t h the n u m b e r o f anecdotes that s u r r o u n d il. In c o l l e c t i n g and r e c o u n t i n g such a n e c d o t e s , writers like C h a t w i n reveal themselves to be skillful raconteurs. Often, o n e a n e c d o t e or slory will tend to generate another: the m o r e uncertain the origin o f a w o r d , or p l a c e , or object, the greater the n u m b e r o f possible c o n lenders—and possible stories. L i k e o p p o r t u n i s t i c journalists, travel writers are often less c o n c e r n e d w i t h ascertaining the details o f a par ticular story t h a n w i t h j u d g i n g w h e t h e r it will m a k e g o o d c o p y . T h e less precise the story, the better c o p y it m i g h t m a k e ; for travel writ ing generates m u c h o f its revenue from r u m o r : it trades in the specu lations that are a t t e n d a n t on uncertainty. In this last c o n t e x t , travel narratives m e d i a t e b e t w e e n the written and the oral. O n e o f the min imum requirements o f the travel writer is that he or she be a g o o d lislener: R a b a n , T h e r o u x , and C h a t w i n , for e x a m p l e , spend less time recounting their o w n experiences t h a n garnering the a p o c r y p h a l stories o f their colorful " i n f o r m a n t s . " W h i l e , once a g a i n , similarities can
be detected here w i t h j o u r n a l i s m and/or e t h n o g r a p h y , a n o t h e r
c o n n e c t i o n is with the folktale: the a n e c d o t e that aspires to legend, t r a v e l writing, for all its trickery, remains a disseminator o f folk w i s d o m ; the travel writer, a r a c o n t e u r a m o n g raconteurs, often cher ishes this w i s d o m and is perfectly prepared to w a n d e r the g l o b e to seek it.
I N 1KOI:>H,K'TIOM
11
ROVING
"l"S
T R A V E L NARRATIVES ARTICULATE A POETICS O F THE W A N D E R I N G SUBJECT. I N M O S T CASES,
THIS
ROVING
SUBJECT REMAINS
AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL
THE FOCUS O F INQUIRY;
I N A FEW,
P E R S O N A O F THE TRAVELER (OR TRAVELING WRITER)
THE
IS SUB
S U M E D B Y W H A T M I C H A E L I G N A T I E F F CALLS A " M E T A P H Y S I C S O F R E S T L E S S N E S S " — A P H I L O S O P H Y O F LIFE B A S E D O N T H E A P P A R E N T N E E D FOR M O V E M E N T . WRITING, I NTHIS S E N S E , I SA DISTINCTIVE AUTOBIOGRAPHIES,
IT SEEKS TO M A K E
AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL
3
TRAVEL
F O R M ; LIKE
RETROSPECTIVE SENSE OUT
EXPERIENCES: TO CONVERT A M I S H M A S H O F IMPRESSIONS
1
O F
OTHER
DISCRETE
INTO A COHERENT NAR
RATIVE. B U T U N L I K E M O S T A U T O B I O G R A P H I E S — A T LEAST T H O S E S E E N F R O M A TRA DITIONAL P E R S P E C T I V E — T R A V E L NARRATIVES A R E LESS C O N C E R N E D W I T H R E C U P E R ATING, OR REINVENTING, A SINGLE SELF T H A N WITH F O L L O W I N G T H E TRAJECTORY O F A SERIES O F SELVES I N TRANSIT. T H I S DISTINCTION
FAILS T O A C C O U N T , O F C O U R S E , F O R
REVISIONIST STUDIES O F A U T O B I O G R A P H Y , W H I C H STRESS T H E INSTABILITY WRITING A N D VERSE
WRITTEN
SUBJECT, A N D
THE AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL
THAT I NM A N Y
THE MULTIPLICITY
TEXT-IN-PROCESS. I T REMAINS
TRAVEL NARRATIVES
THIS INSTABILITY
TRUE,
TRA
H O W E V E R ,
ISEXACERBATED, A N D
THE SELF-INQUIRIES C O N D U C T E D B Y TRAVEL WRITERS, E V E N THE M O S T UNSOPHISTICATED,
O F BOTH
O F PERSONAS THAT
THAT
APPARENTLY
ARE OFTEN LIKELY TO REVEAL A CONFLICTED SENSE O F B E L O N G
I N G A N D A L L E G I A N C E . P E R H A P S , I NTHIS S E N S E , T R A V E L W R I T I N G I SM O R E C L O S E L Y AFFILIATED WITH M E M O I R . OF AUTOBIOGRAPHY, OVER TIME,"
F O R L E E Q U I N B Y ,
WHICH
IS " P R E S U M E D
SUBJECTIVITY
TO B E
CONTINUOUS
ISAT O D D S W I T H T H E SUBJECTIVITY
(299).
PLE A N D DISCONTINUOUS"
"INDIVIDUALIZED
UNITARY
A N D
O F M E M O I R ,
T H E SUBJECTIVITY
FERS F R O M THAT O F A U T O B I O G R A P H Y , BIOGRAPHY'S
A M O N G OTHERS, THE
W H I C H IS "MULTI
O F M E M O I R
NOT ONLY
(299).
S E L F H O O D "
IT S E E M S W O R T H R E T U R N I N G H E R E F O R A M O M E N T O F TRAVEL WRITING A S" A SUB-SPECIES
O F M E M O I R
TO FUSSELL'S I NWHICH
DEFINITION
THE
AUTOBIO
GRAPHICAL NARRATIVE ARISES F R O M T H E S P E A K E R ' S E N C O U N T E R W I T H DISTANT
(203).
UNFAMILIAR
DATA"
DICTIONARY
S E N S E , AS A " W R I T T E N
OR BIOGRAPHY." OIR IS SEEN, A R O U N D
1
4
H I S
F U S S E L L IS P R E S U M A B L Y R E F E R R I N G T O M E M O I R
A PLURAL SUBJECT. T H E SUBJECTIVITY
PSYCHIC
travel
DISLOCATION—IS
RETURN TO THE EARLIER PROPOSITION
NARRATIVE
O F M E M O I R
M E M O I R ,
VIEW
OR ITS
FOR HISTORY M E M
REVOLVING
ISFRAGMENTED, OR
DISTANCE
A N D
O F TRAVEL WRITING SUGGESTS A
THAT IT D I S R U P T S
T l X I H I S T S W I T II
IN
THIS S E N S E O F F R A G M E N T A
R E I N F O R C E D B YP H Y S I C A L
THE EXPERIENCE O F ESTRANGEMENT. THIS
1 I
AS M A T E R I A L
M O R E SENSE, THOUGH, W H E N
S E E S I T ,A SA D I S C O N T I N U O U S
AT T H E V E R Y LEAST I N C O M P L E T E ; IN T I O N — O F
R E C O R D SET D O W N
DEFINITION M A K E S
A SQ U I N B Y
DIF
I TA L S O RESISTS T H E V E R Y N O T I O N O F A U T O
CONVENTIONAL
I Y I ' H W I U IT'.HS
OPPOSI-
tions between the self and its others, the domestic and the foreign; and that it provides a vehicle for the revision o f expectations concerning both individual subjecthood and the position o f the h o m e country with respect to the outside world. But while such a view certainly applies to many (contemporary) travel writers, it fails to account for others w h o use their travel writing, precisely, as a means o f confirming their iden tity and consolidating their status as imperial national subjects. Into such a category arguably fall Eric N e w b y , Peter M a y l e , and Patrick Leigh F e r m o r , and several others w h o s e w o r k s capitalize on w h a t 5
Renato R o s a l d o calls "imperialist n o s t a l g i a . " ' Clearly, there is a dan ger in claiming travel writing—and the metaphor o f "travel" in gen eral—for the purposes o f subverting metropolitan ties to race, class, and country. Indeed, one o f the characteristics o f contemporary travel writing is its reversion to earlier forms—its cultivated anachronism— and, in m o r e extreme cases, its studied reluctance to see the w o r l d as having irrevocably changed. A study o f this kind needs to account for these retrograde, but hardly vitiated, forms o f travel writing, as well as for those (post)modern forms that interrogate cultural identity and that provide a means for their writers and readers to learn, while also unlearning, modes o f cultural self-imagination and exchange. T h e "imperial I/eye" o f the travel writer, in M a r y Louise Pratt's conflation, is still operational in an age that, after Empire, has yet to settle imperialism's scores.
16
T h e connection between travel writing
and imperial conquest is a long-standing one; as Stephen Greenblatt argues persuasively, the travel narratives o f C o l u m b u s and other early European "discoverers" helped produce a "discourse o f w o n d e r " that both forestalled the act o f conquest and paradoxically legitimized it by stimulating greed (79-80, 132-34). A n d M a r y C a m p b e l l , delving back further into the premodern history o f travel writing, shows in detail how the " w o n d r o u s " beings embodied in medieval geographic fan tasies were behind some o f the stereotypical images that the Spanish (among other) conquerors used to perceive their " m o n s t r o u s " adver 7
saries and put them to the s w o r d . ' B o t h C a m p b e l l and Greenblatt stress the dangers attendant u p o n the supposed eyewitness: the traveler whose "factual report" on far-flung lands enhanced the lure o f differ ence while preparing the ground for plunder. F o r w h a t had been wit nessed really existed; if was empirically " p r o v e n " and thus available for those with (lie will and power to acquire it. T h e "eyewitness" reports o f early t r a v e l e r s
even the obviously mendacious
I N T i l l M II 11 "I n I N
1 \
thus acted as a
M E A N S ,
NOT
AUDIENCE,
ONLY BUT
ACQUIRED
O F D O C U M E N T I N G
O F
A D D I N G
THE FOREIGN
THE
B O D Y
OR IMPERFECTLY TRANSMITTED,
AS A N O P P O R T U N I T Y
FOR MATERIAL
C O N T E M P O R A R Y WITNESS,
TO
O F
CULTURE
FOR A
K N O W L E D G E ,
DOMESTIC
OFTEN
FALSELY
THAT LED TO THAT CULTURE B E I N G
GAIN.
TRAVEL NARRATIVES
ALSO RELY U P O N THE AUTHORITY
O F THE
E V E N IF T H E Y A R E LESS LIKELY TO B E T A K E N AT F A C E V A L U E O R TO
EXPECT
THEIR MYTHS,
PASSING
GREENBLATT
REMINDS
AS FACTS, TO B E ( M I S ) R C A D W I T H A N E Y E FOR PROFIT. US,
THE
EYEWITNESS,
REAL
OR
NOT,
FUNCTIONS
RHETORICAL STRATEGY TO P E R S U A D E THE READER O F THE "AUTHENTICITY" IS
REPORTED
OFTEN
SEEN
1 8
(129).
PLAYS
O N
C O N T E M P O R A R Y
SUCH
TRAVELER IMPOSES
NOTIONS
TRAVEL
WRITING,
O F AUTHENTICITY,
SUBJECTIVITY
IN
O N THE NARRATIVE
AS
A
O F W H A T
P O S T M O D E R N
EITHER
A S
SHOWING
VEIN,
H O W
OR LAYING BARE THE
THE
P O W E R
STRUCTURES U N D E R L Y I N G CLAIMS TO TRUTH. N E E D L E S S TO SAY, H O W E V E R , N O T C O N T E M P O R A R Y TIED
TO
TRAVEL
NARRATIVES
D O C U M E N T A R Y
M O D E S
D O
O F
THIS;
SEVERAL
PRESENTATION
RECORDING
SCATTERED OBSERVATIONS—USUALLY
N A L — T H E N
REARRANGES T H E M
MORRIS
A N D
REMINDING
COLIN
PROBABLY
ARE
O N
IN
B Y
M O R E
W H I C H
W A Y
THOSE
IN
UNRELIABLE M O D E
O F C O N T E M P O R A R Y
SHARE O F THOSE W H O
THE
CONVENTIONS
THIS LATTER CAN
TRAVEL
FEATURE IN
O F AN
STILL I N D U C E
WRITERS,
SELF-CONSCIOUS
CONTINUALLY
DIFFERENT ROLES. T H I S H E I G H T E N E D CONSCIOUSNESS DIMENSIONS THE
J A N
READ
T H O U G H —
ESSAY
A N D
THE
NOVEL,
IS
O N E
PERSONAS;
FOR
SHUTTLES
O F ROLE-PLAY A N D
A L S O — A N D FOR RAPID
TRAVEL WRITING D R A W S
B E T W E E N PER
EQUALLY
C L O S E L Y —
ROLE-PLAY A N D
THE
INSPIRATION
F R O M F U N —
O F THE M O R E SERIOUS-MINDED
OBVIOUS
ITS
CROSSBREED
T H E H I S T O R Y O F C O M I C T H E A T E R . N O T ALL T R A V E L E R S S H A R E A S E N S E O F T H E S O M E
O F MISFORTUNE,
SELF-CON
GENRE.
SUGGESTS THAT TRAVEL WRITING, ALREADY A
A F F I L I A T E D W I T H T H E D R A M A . W I T H ITS C A P A C I T Y STAGING
JOUR
CATEGORY,
THIS B O O K — P L A Y
ALREADY
T H E FIGURE O F T H E TRAVELER, LITERALLY M O B I L E ,
B E T W E E N
OR
NARRATIVE.
F O R M T H I S P L A Y F U L N E S S T A K E S IS T H E P R E S E N T A T I O N O F M U L T I P L E
FORMATIVE
TRAVELER,
O F A DIARY
O R LESS P L A U S I B L E
A M O N G
THE
ALL
CLOSELY
DISBELIEF. THE MAJORITY
THE LION'S
SCIOUSLY
T H U B R O N
A M O R E
US THAT A HISTORICALLY
ERS TO S U S P E N D
A N D
INTO
REMAIN
INSIST O N THEIR J O U R N E Y S B E I N G S E E N
SPIRITUAL Q U E S T S , AS S U R R O G A T E P I L G R I M A G E S — B U T
E V E N IN THE MOST
O F TRAVEL NARRATIVES,
T H E R E IS A N U N D E R L Y I N G H I N T
THE TRAVELER HIMSELF
OR HERSELF CUTS
DISPLACED
PLACES
TRAVEL
ONTO
WRITING
GRUITIES;
THE BUILDS
A FARCICAL
CULTURES
M O M E N T U M
PHILOSOPHICALLY
IN V E R I F Y I N G THE
OR
RELATIVISTIC,
F R O M
O F FARCE. I N
FIGURE; IN
TRAVELED THE
I Ol 1 IMS IS W i l l i
ACCUMULATION
I' Y l ' l ' W K I I I • K S
CASES, IS
L I K E
FARCE,
O F
INCON
IT E N J O Y S N O G R E A T E R P L E A S U R E
IMPROBABLE.
|6
S O M E
OTHERS, FARCE
THROUGH.
AS
EARNEST
THAN
T H E
VARIOUS
A G A M U T
F R O M
O F SLAPSTICK
COMIC
TECHNIQUES O F C O N T E M P O R A R Y
UNDERSTATED U R B A N E WIT
( O ' H A N L O N ) .
AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL
T H E S E TWO
( C H A T W I N )
WRITERS'
R A N G E O F TRAVEL WRITING:
T R A V E L E R IS P R I M A R I L Y
AN OBSERVER, HIDING
W O R K
IN
TRAVEL WRITING
TO THE CRUDEST
RUN
FORMS
ALSO ILLUSTRATES
CHATWIN'S
THE
NARRATIVES
B E H I N D T H E ECCENTRICITIES
THE
O F THE
C H A R A C T E R S H E O B S E R V E S ; I N O ' H A N L O N ' S , T H E T R A V E L E R H I M S E L F IS T H E G R E A T EST ECCENTRIC, M A K I N G
A
VIRTUE
O F HIS
M A D C A P
SEXUAL FANTASIES, P O S I N G AS A G R O W N - U P C A M P
R O M P .
ANTICS
A N D
HIS
W A Y W A R D
SCHOOLBOY IN A B A W D Y
O ' H A N L O N A P P E A R S TO B E S E L F - O B S E S S E D , C H A T W I N
ING. B U T THIS DISTINCTION
PROVES TO B E MISLEADING;
S U M M E R SELF-EFFAC
FOR CHATWIN,
ALTHOUGH
LESS O B V I O U S L Y E G O T I S T I C T H A N O ' H A N L O N , N O N E T H E L E S S FILLS H I S B O O K S
WITH
CHARACTERS W H O
ALSO
PARTLY RESEMBLE HIMSELF.
C H A T W I N ' S NARRATIVES
SIMILAR TO O ' H A N L O N ' S IN PRESENTING N O T SO M U C H M O C K I N G
SKIT O N T H E POSSIBILITIES
ARE
A SELF-INQUIRY AS A SELF-
INHERENT IN THE
FIGURE
O F THE TRAVELER-
WRITER. F O R T H E F O R M E R , T H E TRAVELER-WRITER E M E R G E S AS A CROSS B E T W E E N N O M A D ,
AN
INVETERATE WANDERER
A N D
SEEKER IN
FAR-OFF,
A
AWE-INSPIRING
PLACES, A N D A COLLECTOR, A PATIENT G A T H E R E R O F O T H E R P E O P L E ' S STORIES
A N D
CONNOISSEUR
THE
O F DISTANT
PLACES, R E M O T E CULTURES, EXOTIC THINGS.
F O R
L A T T E R , T H E T R A V E L E R - W R I T E R IS P A R T T E A C H E R , P A R T FALL G U Y : A S C I E N T I S T TO
PURSUE,
CLOWN A
OBTAIN,
A N D
RECORD
N E W
FORMS
PERFORMING O N E (INTENTIONAL?)
PERVERSE DELIGHT BOTH
EQUALLY CONTRIVED O ' H A N L O N H U M O R ,
IN
IT
O F T E N IS,
O W N
CONTRIVED
HIS
PLACE
A M O N G
IS
A
ALSO
MISFORTUNES
A N D ACTIONS
A N D
AROUSE IN
DIRECTED
SQUARELY
AGAINST
A
TAKING IN
THE
OTHERS.
O F THE SELF-INDULGENT TRAVELER, E V E N W H E N
M O R E U R B A N E , IS T H E D A N D Y C O N S C I O U S OF
BUT
BLUNDER AFTER ANOTHER, A N D
O U T R A G E THAT HIS W O R D S
IS T H E E P I T O M E
AS
HIS
O F K N O W L E D G E ,
EAGER
HIS
HIMSELF;
CHATWIN,
O F HIS COOLNESS, B U T ALSO
CONSCIOUS
GALLERY O F ITINERANT
WITS
A N D
FRAUDS.
A P P A R E N T I N E A C H C A S E IS T H E R E L A T I V E L A C K O F I N T R O S P E C T I O N ,
W H A T
IS
A N D THE TEN
D E N C Y TO PRESENT THE SELF T H R O U G H A N ARRAY O F STOCK CARICATURAL
MOTIFS.
(LIVEN M O R E CONFESSIONAL O R " Q U E S T I N G " TRAVEL WRITERS, LIKE D E R V L A
M U R
P H Y OR PETER MATTHIESSEN,
IDEN-
T E N D TO U S E T H E S E TROPES AS A M E A N S
LI L Y I N G T H E M S E L V E S A S T R A V E L E R S , A N D O F A V O I D I N G TION
THAT
MIGHT
SENSE, MIGHT PERHAPS
I M M O B I L I Z E
BETTER,
IT
MIGHT
/ W W C I A U T O B I O G R A P H Y : LIFE"
(TRAVELING)
T H E FACT ICILY B Y
THEIR
E V E N B E S E E N AS H A V I N G B E
TRAVEL
WRITING,
INTROSPEC IN
AN AN/ZAUTOBIOGRAPHICAL
CONSIDERED
AS
A
DISINGENUOUS
THIS ASPECT; F O R M
LAST OR O F
O N E THAT, WHILE P U R P O R T I N G TO E X A M I N E THE " R E A L -
WRITER'S
PERSONALITY,
O F THE (TRAVELING)
SWAPPING
QUESTS.)
THE EXCESSIVE
O F
MASKS
ANIL
ENDS
U P
INSTEAD
B Y
E M P H A S I Z I N G
WRITTEN
SUBJECT.
SHIFTING
ROLES, P R E V E N T I N G E A S Y
IM I K O I M K
I IIIN
1/
IDENTIFICA-
TION,
TRAVEL
WRITERS
SUCH
A SC H A T W I N
A N D
O ' H A N L O N
SELVES F R O M THEIR O W N ,
HIGHLY PERSONAL, NARRATIVES.
WRITERS
O FTHE
PLAY
IS THAT
O ' H A N L O N ' S
NARRATIVES,
MODELS; FOR E X A M P L E , A
FIELD
I N PARTICULAR,
O W E
A M E R I C A N
A FURTHER ROLE
B Y THEIR
ACCOUNT
RAIN FOREST, ISA P A R O D Y O F THE
O F
W O R K
H E R E THE NOTION O F THE "ROVING I" TAKES O N A DIFFERENT
OBJECTS
O F
STUDY,
TRAVEL
T H R O U G H THE ACT O F CULTURAL V O Y E U R I S M . AT T I M E S ,
BOTH
T O ANTHROPOLOGICAL
HIS R A U C O U S
CONNOTATION; FOR LIKE ANTHROPOLOGISTS FASCINATED TO THE POINT ENCE
T H E M
PARTICIPANT-OBSERVER:
M U C H
In Trouble Again (1988),
TRIP TO T H E S O U T H
O F LEVI-STRAUSS.
ANTHROPOLOGICAL
DISTANCE
AS I NT H E NARRATIVES
1
9
WRITERS
EROTICIZE
V O Y E U R I S M
O F M O R L E Y A N D
O F
PRURI
THEIR
WORK
TAKES M A N Y
FORMS:
B U S I , S E X I T S E L F IS T H E
SUB
JECT; AT O T H E R S , T H E " E X O T I C " P E O P L E O R P L A C E S D E S C R I B E D A R E A S S E S S E D F O R T H E I R S E D U C T I V E N E S S ( I Y E R , C H A T W I N ) ; A T STILL O T H E R S , T H E V E R Y S T R A N G E N E S S O F T H E C U L T U R E ISC O M P E L L I N G ( N E W B Y , CONFRONTING
BOWLES).
THE SPECTACLE O F (BRAZILIAN)
O ' H A N L O N , FOR E X A M P L E ,
Y A N O M A M I
RITUAL,
TURNS
THE
PRIVILEGE O F THE VISITING FOREIGNER INTO THE LICENSE O F THE V O Y E U R : M A Y B E
I H A D SIMPLY B E E N TRAVELLING I NTHE JUNGLE TOO LONG, BUT I JUST
SAT A N D S T A R E D AT T H E Y O U N G W O M E N , SUNLIGHT THREW L O N G CARESSING
FLICKERS
T O O A B S O R B E D E V E N TO CLAP.
T H E
O F LIGHT O V E R T H E M T H R O U G H T H E
M O V I N G FRONDS, THEIR UNCLOTTED SKIN WAS EXTRAORDINARILY S M O O T H .
T H E
W O M A N W I T H T H E M I R R O R , W H O W A S LAST I NL I N E , D A N C E D W I T H M O R E
PAS
S I O N T H A N T H E REST: S H E H A D D R A W N S Q U I G G L Y LINES D O W N H E R C H E E K S
AND
TWO
EYE
MORE
BROWS,
RAN
DOWN
THE CENTRE OF HER FOREHEAD, BETWEEN HER
TO EITHER SIDE O F H E R N O S E B E N E A T H T H E L O N G W H I T E STICK I N H E R
SEPTUM, WHERE
AND
TWO
THEN BENT OUTWARDS
TO THE CORNERS O F H E R B O T T O M
FRESH STICKS P R O J E C T E D . S H E
HAD
COVERED HER BODY
LIP WITH
LARGE, IRREGULARLY S P A C E D R O U N D BLOTCHES LIKE THE SPOTS O N THE COAT
OF
A J A G U A R ; T H O S E O N H E R BREASTS W E R E AS B I G AS T H E A U R E O L E S A R O U N D H E R ERECT NIPPLES; T H E Y STRETCHED VERTICALLY INTO
OVALS
A SSHE RAISED
A R M S A B O V E H E R H E A D A N D H E R BREASTS T A U T E N E D A N D
FLATTENED,
HER
AND THEN
B E C A M E CIRCULAR A G A I N AS H E R B R E A S T S FELL F O R W A R D A N D R O U N D E D I N T H E SHUFFLING DANCE.
IN
PASSAGES
DETAIL
WITH
REMINDED
LIKE
THIS
O N E , O ' H A N L O N
A FETISHIST'S
DELIGHT
COMBINES
FOR FORBIDDEN
A NATURALIST'S FLESH;
HERE O F THE "SOFT PRIMITIVIST" PHOTOGRAPHS
graphic,
WHICH
(NATIVE)
B O D Y .
IN
(In Trouble Again 225)
SO 2
THE WORK
OFTEN FOCUS
O N
O N E IS O F
E Y E
FOR
INEVITABLY
National
THE E R O G E N O U S ZONES O F THE
Geo FEMALE
0
O F NAIPAUL,
MEANWHILE,
A DIFFERENT K I N D O F
VOYEURISM
CAN
BE DETECTED, A SINDIA'S SQUALOR ISREDUCED TO A S H O W , WITH
CAST
INTHE ROLE O F HORRILIED
18
SPECTATOR:
11 it 1 it 1 v i s w 1 i l l 1 v r i w i d 11 «
HIMSELF
Y o u might think of taking an early morning walk along the balustraded avenue that runs beside the Mandoui River. Six feet below, on the water's edge, and as far as you can see, there is a line, like a wavering tidewrack, of squatters. For the people of Goa, as for those of imperial Rome, defecating is a social activity; they squat close to one another; they chatter. When they are done they advance, trousers still down, backsides bare, into the water, to wash them selves. They climb back on to the avenue, jump on their cycles or get into their cars, and go away. The strand is littered with excrement; amid this excrement fish is being haggled over as it is landed from the boats; and every hundred yards or so there is a blue-and-white enam elled notice in Portuguese threatening punishment for soiling the river. But no one notices. (An Area of Darkness 74) The voyeuristic fervor with which Naipaul documents this activity is matched by the moralism with which he denounces it—a combination often found in travel narratives, which are quick to register distaste for the "degenerate" practices of other cultures, but are less inclined to rec ognize their enjoyment of the tawdriness those cultures display. F o r travel writing, although it freely avails itself o f the license o f the exotic— a mode that, as G . S. Rousseau and R o y Porter describe it, "afford[s] a moral 'time out,' a local habitation and a name for a fantasy world where all the normal rules—of decorum, taste, narrative, plausibility, and causeand-effect—[can] legitimately be suspended" (13)—has the tendency, paradoxically, to see itself as an ethical commentary: as a critique of "declining standards," corruption, physical and spiritual decay. While it would be easy here to lambaste travel writers for their obvious double standards, what they are doing in effect is exploiting the doubleness already inscribed within the exotic. For if exoticists valorize difference, they are as eager to impugn it; exoticism functions-as a dialectic of attrac tion and repulsion through which (cultural) difference can be acknowl 21
edged but also, if need be, held at bay ( T o d o r o v ) . Travel writing tends to function this way, expressing itself through exotic registers that allow for often voyeuristic appreciation o f "different" places, cultures, and peo ples while reserving the right to judge them according to narrowly ethno centric tastes. The roving "I"s of travel narratives, like those of ethnogra phies, seek out difference; but they are less likely than their ethnographic counterparts to relativize their findings, to analyze the local systems through which cultures shape and reshape meaning. Instead, they are often drawn to surfaces
more particularly, to b o d i e s - o n t o which they
project I heir fears and fantasies ol'lhe elhnicized cultural "other."
t
NI
in n i l
11
I K IN
M)
LATE
T H E
VOYEURISTIC
DEPARTURES, EARLY
TENDENCIES O F TRAVEL WRITING SKETCHED A B O V E
HIGHLY PATRIARCHAL
THE
LARGE,
W O M E N ,
A N D
BOTH
BACKGROUNDS. FEMALE
M A R Y
A N D
ACCLAIMED
A M A L E - D O M I N A T E D M O R E
R O B Y N
D E S A I W H O ,
D A V I D S O N
I N "WRITING
A C H A L L E N G E TO
"LOST"
BACK"
LIKE V I R A G O ,
OR FORGOTTEN.
T H E
WRITTEN B Y
" N O N - W E S T E R N "
D E R V L A
ARE A M O N G
T OT H E
POPULAR
K I N C A I D ,
SARA COLO
IMPERIAL
CENTERS, RACIALLY
ARE
J A U N
WHICH SPECIALIZE I N W O M E N ' S O F NARRATIVES
CONSIDERABLE
THAT TRAVEL WRITING HAS B E C O M E A VIABLE
J A N
FORMERLY
SOMETIMES
N U M B E R
TRAVEL WRITING N O W E V I D E N T IN A C A D E M I C
THE MOST
F R O M
ITS
M U R P H Y ,
JAMAICA
T H O S E WRITERS
A R E R E C O V E R I N G A NINCREASING
PREVIOUSLY
NOW.
THEIR COMPLACENT,
A N D PUBLISHERS,
F R O M
THE
ACCOUNT
GENRE, TRAVEL WRITING HAS H A D
SO THAN
ARE A M O N G
FAILS TO
NARRATIVES
INCREASINGLY,
O F C O N T E M P O R A R Y TRAVEL WRITERS;
ANITA
DICED, VIEWS; WRITING
AND,
A M O D E L
O F TRAVEL
THE W E S T
A N D
S U C H
N U M B E R
F R O M
COUNTRIES
M O U N T I N G
BODY.
W H I L E
MORRIS,
SULERI, A N D NIZED
GROWING,
PRACTITIONERS—NEVER
A N D
SUGGEST A
M O D E L THAT INDULGES M A L E FANTASIES SURROUNDING
O B J E C T I F I E D — " O T H E R E D " — F E M A L E FOR
ARRIVALS
THAT
INTEREST I N
WERE
W O M E N ' S
C I R C L E S IS A F U R T H E R S I G N , N O T ACADEMIC
ONLY
SUBJECT, BUT THAT IT IS
BEING TAKEN ACCOUNT O F IN CURRENT RESEARCH O N GENDER CONSTRUCTION O N T H E C H A N G I N G P L A C E O F T H E G E N D E R E D S U B J E C T I NT O D A Y ' S
A N D
TRANSNATIONAL
WORLD. W O M E N ' S
T R A V E L W R I T I N G I SN O T I N S U L A T E D F R O M T H E C R I T I C I S M S
A T ITS M A L E C O U N T E R P A R T ; M O R E S P E C I F I C A L L Y , I TI SN O T I M M U N E RIALIST
A N D
IDENTITY TUTED
ETHNOCENTRIC
NOSTALGIA.
H O W E V E R ,
ITS
B YT H E C O M P L E X
INTERACTIONS
O F PATRIARCHAL S O M E W O M E N
A N D
RACE, A N D
IDENTITARY
NORMS.
S U C H AS D E R V L A M U R P H Y
D E S I G N E D TO C H A L L E N G E MASCULINIST
MYTHS.
T H E
THE
DISPLACEMENT
IRONIC
OR M A R Y
ROLE-PLAY
MORRIS,
O F
IS OFTEN
I NT H E SPIRIT O F I S A B E L L E
HARDT, B O T H TRAVELER-WRITERS "IMITATE," OR DISGUISE
AT
O F
CONSTI
CLASS—MARKS
TRAVEL WRITING AS A VEHICLE FOR T H E
IMPERIAL
WRITERS,
O F GENDER,
I M P E
INTERROGATION
O F T H E TRAVELING S U B J E C T — A SUBJECT R E C O G N I Z E D AS B E I N G
C O N T E M P O R A R Y W O M E N ' S
WHILE
LEVELED
F R O M
E B E R -
T H E M S E L V E S AS,
M E N ;
THIS CROSS-DRESSING SERVES AT O N E LEVEL TO FACILITATE THEIR J O U R N E Y S ,
ANOTHER
M U R P H Y
I T FLIES I N T H E
A N D
ASSOCIATED
MORRIS,
WITH THE
FACE
A M O N G FIGURE
O F CONVENTIONAL OTHERS,
P O K E
FUN
GENDER
A TTHE M A L E
TIONALLY ASSOCIATED WITH THEIR
MI
2 2
BRAVADO
O F THE EXPLORER, D E F Y I N G THE RESTRICTIONS
D R E S S , O F S P E E C H A N D , A B O V E ALL O F C O U R S E , O F M O V E M E N T )
IF TRAVEL, FOR W O M E N
DISTINCTIONS.
THAT ARE
(OF
TRADI
SEX.
LIKE THESE, ISA M E D I U M
O F EMANCIPATION,
' n n i ins i s w i i n T Y I - K W U I I i
IL. I S
also a vehicle for the "queering" o f a heterosexual culture. A n increas ing number o f gays and lesbians h a v e turned to travel writing, d r a w i n g on models in part derived from earlier homoerotic fantasy, but also from current theories o f queer performativity, which lay emphasis on I he expressive potential o f the (gendered) b o d y as well as on the dis cursive power o f language in performance. Several o f these w o r k s posit ;i playful—often energetic—alternative to the geographies they associ:ile with heterosexual (both male and female) thought and action. A l d o Busi, R o l a n d Barthes, and, to some extent, Bruce C h a t w i n are a m o n g l hose writers for w h o m the experience o f travel unlocks conceptual doors: Busi is the unrestrained libertine, m o v i n g from country (and partner) to country; Barthes and C h a t w i n are the aesthetes, connois seurs o f food and fashion, alert to the ritualized spectacles they m a k e of foreign cultures, and producing travel narratives that, self-con sciously seductive, dramatize their theories in a j o y o u s "philosophy-inperformance." Pleasure is the principle that guides these different writ ers; as C h a t w i n ' s later writing shows, it is a pleasure that m a y exact its price. F o r travel, in the age o f A I D S , has presented new frontiers o f danger—dangers that are alluded to in C h a t w i n ' s final, poignant essays but that also feature more robustly in the w o r k o f M o r l e y and Iyer, traveling in Thailand, and o f S h o u m a t o f f in Africa, investigating I he virus's possible sources. While providing another outlet for a staple o f travel writing, the < autionary tale, A I D S culture has inevitably impacted the behavior o f modern-day travelers, bringing with it a heightened awareness o f the risks—an understanding not just that travel's apparent freedoms m a y he misleading, but that the pursuit o f freedom itself m a y be at one's own, and others', expense. Traveler-writers w h o c o m e from areas pre viously colonized by Europe were always likely to see such freedom II i n n a critical perspective. Jamaica K i n c a i d ' s A Small Place (1988) and 1 'uryl Phillips's The European Tribe (1987), b o t h by writers born in the I aribbean but currently living in the diaspora, are t w o g o o d examples ol highly politicized forms o f travel writing, which interrogate both the history o f the genre they are employing and the underlying attitudes— nil en downright x e n o p h o b i c — t h a t have led to its becoming over time II fertile ground for misconception and for the unobstructed play o f I !uro-American (mostly white middle-class) f a n t a s y . Kincaid's and Phillips's work might be described as a kind o f countertrwel writing insofar as it pits ilself against I he d o m i n a n t Eurocentric model. But 23
H O W
L O N G WILL THIS
BEGINNING DIFFICULT
D O M I N A N C E
LAST?
CERTAINLY,
T OTAKE O NA MULTICULTURAL
T O J U S T I F Y T H ET R A V E L E R ' S " O N E - W A Y "
TION, REGULATED F R O M THE I M A G I N E D
TRAVEL WRITING T O D A Y IS
E T H O S . I TISB E C O M I N G VISION—HIS
INCREASINGLY
O RHER
SAFETY O FT H E M E T R O P O L I S ,
PERCEP
O F PEOPLE,
P L A C E S , A N D C U L T U R E S S E E N A S A L I E N O RR E M O T E . F O R O N E T H I N G , T H E OLIS ITSELF IS CLEARLY A M U L T I E T H N I C CONTRADICTORY,
REALITIES
M E T R O P
ENTITY, A PLACE WHERE DIFFERENT, OFTEN
M I X A N D MINGLE.
A N D F O RA N O T H E R ,
ANTHROPOLOGICAL C O N C E P T I O N O FA DISTINCTIVE
T H E OLDER
(SEPARATE) CULTURE H A S B E E N
L A R G E L Y R E P L A C E D B Y A L O N G E R V I E W T H A T S E E S A L LC U L T U R A L F O R M S , ING I NA TRANSNATIONAL
T E R N O F D I S - A N DR E L O C A T I O N .
We
live
in a confusing
intersecting
systems
2 4
R O G E R R O U S E STATES THIS V I E W
world,
a world
o f meaning,
o f crisscrossed
a n d fragmented
PAT
SUCCINCTLY:
economies,
identities.
denly, thecomforting m o d e r n imagery o f nation-states a n d
Sud
national
languages, o f coherent c o m m u n i t i e s a n d consistent subjectivities,
o f
d o m i n a n t centers a n d distant margins, n o longer seems adequate.
(8)
W H A T
H A P P E N S
"TRANSNATIONAL
T O T R A V E L W R I T I N G I N A N A G E O FW H A T H O M I
B H A B H A
DISSEMINATION."
O FA
A TA T I M E
W H E N
CULTURE, O RE V E N "CULTURE," ISU N D E R THREAT? DIAMETRICALLY
2 5
T H EI D E A
M U C H
O P P O S E D , SETS O F R E S P O N S E S A R E P O S S I B L E . F I R S T , T R A V E L W R I T
MODIFICATION—THAT A N D INTERSECT.
2 6
O F THIS
SUBJECT,
LIVING
E M B O D I M E N T
WORLD.
IYER
Video Night in Kathmandu STATES,
G H O S H ,
CHINA,
O F INDIAN
SETH'S
FORMS
(1988)
IS A G O O D A
BRITISH
BACKGROUND,
ISA N
SEVERAL O F T H E MOST
A N G L O P H O N E TRAVEL WRITERS
K A N G A
ARE JUST
EBULLIENT ACCOUNT
A R E SOUTH
STATES. V I K R A M THREE
FLUENT CHINESE,
W O R E
SETH,
From
O F THESE.
O F H I S VISIT T O T I B E T A N D
I SA C A S E S T U D Y O F T H E D I F F I C U L T Y O F A S C E R T A I N I N G
W H O SPEAKS
COLLIDE
TRAVEL W R I T I N G ADJUSTS ITS G A U G E S T O
I N B R I T A I N O R T H EU N I T E D
A N D FIRDAUS
CUL
E X C H A N G E A N D
A N D IYER HIMSELF,
IS N O T A L O N E ; I N D E E D ,
O FC O N T E M P O R A R Y LIVING
O FM U T U A L
DIFFERENT CULTURAL
O FTRAVEL NARRATIVE.
O F WHAT H A P P E N S W H E N
Heaven Lake (1983), M A I N L A N D
IYER'S
KIND
DIASPORICS
A M I T A V
PLACE W H E N
I N T H E U N I T E D
POSTCOLONIAL
ACCOMPLISHED
TAKES
PICO
E X A M P L E
SETH,
FOCUSING NOT S O
O NENCOUNTERS B E T W E E N THE TRAVELER A N D THE TARGET CULTURE (OR
T U R E S ) A S O N T H E P R O C E S S O FT R A N S C U L T U R A T I O N
A S I A N
CALLS
NATIONAL
A T LEAST T W O , M O R E O R LESS
ING CAN RECOGNIZE THE CONFFICTEDNESS O F CULTURAL ORIGINS,
A
INTERACT
C O N T E X T , A SS T R A N D S I N A G L O B A L , H Y B R I D I Z E D
T H E TRADITIONAL
ORIGINS.
M A O I S T
BLUE
TROUSERS, JACKET, A N D C A PD U R I N G H I STRAVELS, A N D W A SD U L Y T A K E N B Y SEV ERAL O F THE P E O P L E H E E N C O U N T E R E D FOR A C H I N E S E T H E
SECOND
SET O F RESPONSES INVOLVES
(100-108).
T H ERECOGNITION
O F BELATED-
NESS. I TISN O L O N G E R POSSIBLE L O (OUT A V I E W OF, SAY, " ( H E E N G L I S H
• I O I I K I M S W I I II
I • Y I T . W H I I !• IN".
GENTLC-
man a b r o a d " as if this gentleman—naturally, white—existed other I han in myth. Y e t this myth, precisely, matters and is adhered to with a. vengeance, even though its effect is largely comic and its p o w e r obvi ously in decline. This is the stance taken b y Eric N e w b y and, to a lesser extent, R e d m o n d O ' H a n l o n ; it even lurks in the b a c k g r o u n d o f C h a t w i n ' s w o r k and that o f the A n g l o p h i l e T h e r o u x . T r a v e l writing, for these writers, dramatizes the unwieldy p a r a d o x o f reconfirming a national identity that is already recognized as being out o f step with the limes. This regressive cultural nationalism has m o r e sinister implica tions, yet these are sidestepped by recourse to p a r o d y and preemptive self-critique. These t w o responses are symptomatic o f a "postimperial" era that has yet to deliver itself from the recrudescence o f its beliefs. T h e dis course o f " p o s t " implies, o f course, an ambivalent relationship with what precedes it, and a sense o f temporal flux that argues against deci sive break. C o n t e m p o r a r y travel writers are arguably caught in this hiatus, aware o f their temporal, as well as their geographical, displace ment. Part o f this dilemma has to d o w i t h the p h e n o m e n o n o f speed. I )eparting late, they find that they are arriving all t o o early: changes in the technology o f transportation, while m a k i n g travel more efficient and easier, potentially rob such traveler-writers o f the leisure time they need. Speed is antithetical to the physical and verbal meandering o f conventional travel writing, w h i c h relies on m o d e s o f transportation (walking, cycling, rail travel) that require the passage o f time. Speed also opposes the myth o f labor on which travel writing so often depends. T h e idea o f hardship is intrinsic to more traditional forms o f I ravel writing it is n o surprise to find a popular anthology entitled, simply enough, Bad Trips (J991). A s the editor o f the v o l u m e , K e a t h Eraser, colorfully puts it, " T r a v e l will still suggest 'travail' to those who k n o w that b y leaving h o m e they risk wire-walking without a net" (xiv). A n d , even more colorfully: " A bad j o u r n e y mirrors its exotic cir cumference, t h r o w i n g b a c k an image o f the writer in extremis, w h o is willing to be tested, m o c k e d , and remain remarkably undaunted when il begins to rain on his parade . . . when the rim o f the troddened w o r l d degenerates into a via dolorosa" ( x v i i - x v i i i ) . Fraser apparently k n o w s I he value o f glibness in travel writing; the reality, however, especially lor c o n t e m p o r a r y travelers, is that their j o u r n e y s are rarely as trau matic or as heroic as they w o u l d have us believe. Eraser's anthology, published in 1991 with pieces collecled mostly from the eighties, wryly illustrates how some traveler-writers, in C i l l e r p u r s u i t o f trouble, will 27
28
Introduction 23
FIND
IT W H E N
THEY LEAST E X P E C T I T — A N D
W H A T HAPPENS, THOUGH, W H E N
O F T E N N O T D E A L W I T H I TV E R Y
THE SPACE O F TRAVEL THREATENS TO
A L T O G E T H E R — W H E N TRAVEL GOES "VIRTUAL," FUSED WITH THE NEEDLESS
U M B E R T O
TO SAY,
SUCH
USE
E C O
DOES NOT
CON
ARE
TWO
THOSE
A N D
EXAMPLES
(1986)
PERCEPTIONS
A N D
PRESENT
J E A N
FORMS.
BAUDRILLARD'S
TRAVEL
TOWARD
VARIANTS
TRAVEL
UNUSUAL
NARRATIVES
O F THE "VIRTUAL"
A SA M E A N S
BOTH
NEW,
O F CONTEMPORARY
O N THE PERCEPTIONS
BAUDRILLARD
SPELL THE E N D O F
IS TO U S H E R I NS O M E
Travels in Hyperreality
ECO'S
THAT, PLAYING IRONICALLY
FORM.
A SCENARIO
ITD O E S INSTEAD
(1988)
TRAVELER,
DISAPPEAR
A N D REALITY ITSELF B E C O M E S
HYPERREAL?
WRITING; WHAT
America
WELL.
OR
" H Y P E R "
REJUVENATING O N
WHAT
THE
M I G H T B E
CALLED THE "THEORETICAL TRAVELER": THEIR ACTUAL J O U R N E Y S ARE O N L Y THE PRE TEXT FOR THEIR THEORIES A N D AS "POST-TOURISTIC" TOURISTS"
(UNLIKE
ACCUMULATING
I NSENSIBILITY,
AUTHENTIC
IMPROVE
O N
LATEST M E D I A T E D
PSEUDOSCIENCE
W H O S E
O F T O U R I S M AS A G A M E .
FACT A N D
HISTORICAL
A N D
O F SURROGATE
TRAVEL NARRATIVES T A I N IT; I N S C A N N I N G A N D
SEEN
"POST-
A N D
WITH
A C O M P L E X
M Y T H ,
BETWEEN
LUDI
SEEK T O WITH
O F PERFECT
BUT
IT ALSO
THE
ITHAS
THE M O D
RESTATES
TO A
O F ILLU
INDETERMINATE THRIVED
O N
TRAPPINGS
O F
W H O S E
AREA
A DIET A
MULTIPLE
O F
WORLD POSSIBLE
BUT ALSO TO
AN INVENTORY O F
TO CONFRONT THE U N E X P E C T E D
TRAVEL WRITING'S DESIRE TO C O M E
CONTEMPORARY
A N D
PAST.
STRANGE
ITSNOSTALGIC
STILL P A R O C H I A L ,
1"UHiM • W I T H
ADJUST
TO
GENRE. THIS
1 Yi'KWRITKits
TERMS
N E E D T O
T H E S E C O M P E T I N G
BRITISH TRAVEL WRITERS,
CON
DOMESTICATED
M A I N T A I N S THAT BALANCE B E T W E E N
I N TRANSFORMATION
NENTS O F A LABILE, BUT S O M E H O W
I
THAT
UNDERSTOOD.
R E S T O R E T H E I M A G I N A R Y SITE O F A " S I M P L E R " A M O N G
SIMU
OR WITH THE
OBJECTS
STRIVE TO E X P R E S S T H E U N F A M I L I A R ,
WORLD
TO B E
O F
I NPART A R E S P O N S E
TRAVEL;
THE PAST, THEY C O M P I L E
REVERSION:
OR
ILLUSIONS—THE
YET THEY ARE M A D E
M E N T
LIKELY
ECO'S FASCINATION
INHABITING
A N D
MYSTERIES,
NESS O F THE PRESENT. THIS B O O K
ARE APPARENT
0
O F T H E " R E A L . " T R A V E L W R I T I N G , A F T E R ALL, I S
OBSERVATION;
ARE ONLY PARTLY
MYSTERIES,
3
O F TRAVEL WRITING WITH THE M A N U F A C T U R E
FABLE, HISTORY
RUMORS,
M O R E
ARTIFACTS,
SITES
WHAT THEY ONCE C O P I E D — I S
FORMS
O F
ARE M U C H
G E O G R A P H Y ISONLY PARTLY COVERED, A N D
HISTORIES
BEST
WITH THE KITSCH DISPLAY
BAUDRILLARD'S
SIONS THAT TEST T H E B O U N D A R I E S
HALF-TRUTHS,
ARE PERHAPS
F A K E R Y — WITH THE CONSTRUCTION
PERENNIAL PREOCCUPATION
BETWEEN
WRITERS
O F " G E N U I N E " NATIVE
THE ORIGINAL.
ELS THAT T H E N S U P P L A N T
A
AWARE
INAUTHENTIC:
T OR E C O N S T R U C T
POSSIBILITY O F A B S O L U T E
THE
BOTH
EXPERIENCE; THEY
LATED PLACES A N D COPIES ATTEMPT
2 9
S E L F - D E S I G N A T E D " T R A V E L E R S " ) A R E N O T AT ALL I N T E R E S T E D I N
TAKEN WITH THE OBVIOUSLY
CROUS
BELIEFS.
ADEPT
DRIVES E X P O
PAROCHIALISM
is embodied in the mythic
figure—already
i n t r o d u c e d — o f the gentle
man traveler, forever on the m o v e but a l w a y s missing h o m e , and defiantly out o f date. B y showing h o w several travel writers manipulate the trope o f the gentleman traveler, the next chapter examines the view that British travel writing, in the nominally postimperial era, continues to trade successfully in ironically recycled imperial myths.
I N T H Q t U K '
i K I N
Chapter one After Empire
IMPERIALIST THE
" A S
TRAVELERS A N D TRAVEL
FUSSELL F O R
ENGLISH
I N HIS STUDY
NOSTALGIA
GENTLEMAN
WRITERS,
AND
T R A V E L E R
T H E ENGLISH
A R E SPECIAL,"
O F BRITISH LITERARY TRAVELING B E T W E E N
SAYS
P A U L
T H EW A R S
(73).
FUSSELL, T H EE N G L I S H TRAVELER-WRITER IS SINGLED O U TF R O M
PARTICULAR
BRAND
O F ECCENTRIC
INDIVIDUALISM.
FUSSELL'S
OTHERS B YA
(PERHAPS
SIVELY) AFFECTIONATE STUDY IS D E D I C A T E D ACCORDINGLY T O THE M E M O R Y NOTORIOUS "ORIGINALS" THE M O R E W A U G H :
A S T H E IRREPRESSIBLE ART HISTORIAN R O B E R T B Y R O N A N D
C U R M U D G E O N L Y ,
B U T SCARCELY LESS F L A M B O Y A N T ,
L A R G E R - T H A N - L I F E F I G U R E S B O T H , B U T N O TU N T Y P I C A L
ELER-WRITERS
O F T H EINTERWAR
PERIOD,
W H O WERE
NOVELIST
M E N T S "
'INTERNATIONALISM,' ROMANTICALLY,
(78).
O F POST-WAR
FREQUENTLY
SOCIAL
E V E L Y N
O FE N G L I S H
CONFORMITY,
A N D POLITICAL
FUSSELL SEES B Y R O N A N DW A U G H
TRAV
"OUTRAGEOUS,
C O N D U C T I N G [THEIR] LIBERTARIAN GESTURE AGAINST THE PREDICTABLE LH E DULL
EXCES O F SUCH
ARRANGE
AS REPRESEN
TATIVES O FT H E " F I N A L A G E O FT R A V E L , " W H I C H H A S S I N C E G I V E N W A Y T O M O D E R N COMMERCIAL ECHOES
TOURISM.
I N P R O N O U N C I N G
T H ESENTIMENTS
O FW A U G H
T H E A G E O F TRAVEL
HIMSELF,
D E A D ,
W H O B E L I E V E D THAT
FUSSELL
T H EE N DO F
T H E W A R A L S O S I G N A L E D T H EE N DO F T H E G O L D E N A G EO F T R A V E L W R I T I N G ; WERE THE HALCYON DAYS W H E N Mr.
G R A H A M
B Y R O N
. . .
W A U G H ' S LATER,
G R E E N E
TO T H ELIBERIAN
T O THE RUINS THRENODY
W E FIND
" M R .P E T E R F L E M I N G W E N T T O T H E G O B I
O FPERSIA"
TURNED
H I MA G A I N
HINTERLAND
. . . [ A N D ]M R .
(When the Going Was Good
O U T T OH A V E
B E E N
PREMATURE;
A N D I N CHARACTERISTICALLY
F O RA
EBULLIENT
G O N E
DESERT, R O B E R T 11). B U T D E C A D E M O O D —
writing a preface f o r the b o o k O F a n e w l y discovered literary traveler: E r i c N e w b y . N e w b y , f o r W A U G H . is " T H E latest, B U T , I p r a y , N O T t h e last o f a w h i m s i c a l t r a d i t i o n . " W a u g h eelebi.iles N e w b y ' s u n d e r s t a t e m e n t ,
SELF-RIDICULE, DELIGHT I NTHE FOREIGNNESS O F FOREIGNERS, C O M P L E T E O F A N Y A T T E M P T T O ENLIST T H E S Y M P A T H I E S O F HIS READERS I N T H E H E H A SCAPRICIOUSLY
INVITED
P R E S E N C E O FT H E SPECIALIST
. . . [AND]
FORMAL
DENIAL
HARDSHIPS
SELF-EFFACEMENT I N THE
(WITH THE ESSENTIAL RESERVE O FU N E X P R E S S E D
SELF-RESPECT). ALL O F THESE QUALITIES DELIGHT THE HEART O F A M A N" W H O S E ARE
D O N E
ABROAD
A N DW H O SEES,
B Y OTHER, N E W
N E WT H A T N E W B Y
U P H O L D E R O F A TRADITION
A N DW I T H O U T
W H O
"SHUNS
E M B O D I E S O F
A N YC O N C E R N W I T H
SCIENCE O R POLITICS
O R C O M
FEET H A V E T R O D "
(PREF
12). W A U G H
SELF,
I SP A R T L Y R I G H T I NHIS J U D G M E N T O F N E W B Y ;
I N THE
O P E N I N G
P A G E S
( 1 9 8 2 ) , ISC E R T A I N L Y Q U I C K S A M E
TIME,
SCHOOL
BOTH
ABROAD.
FIGURE
WRITING—LIKE
(THESIGER,
WITHIN A N D N E W B Y
against
THAT
LEWIS,
SCHOLAR:
F E R M O R ) — A S
O F THE ENGLISH M O R E
A NA V I D
O W N
AFFORDS A N O T H E R
R E M I N D E R
O FTHE
IMPERIAL NATIONAL CULTURE. W A U G H
I M A G I N E D
IMPRESSIVE
SUPERIORITY
BOTH,
THEY A R E — O R P E R H A P S BETTER, THEY P O S E A S — G E N T L E M A N TIME.
SELF-CONSCIOUSLY
B U T FOR N E W B Y ,
T H ESENSE
M O R E U R G E N T . H E H A SB E E N B O R N ,
OCCASION
I NH I S TRAVEL WRITINGS,
ANACHRONISTIC
O N E H U N D R E D
O NM O R E
RETAIN FIGURES
SCHOLARS
O FBELATEDNESS
H ELAMENTS
ERU
O F HIS
A N D , PARTICULARLY, B Y R O N
O FTHESE CHARACTERISTICS:
O FTHEIR
GENTLE
STUDENT A N D C O N
S O M E
M U C H
B E I N G
CLOSELY WITH T H E
S U M E R O F OTHER, MOSTLY N O N - E U R O P E A N CULTURES W H O S E DITION
Life AT THE
O FSEVERAL O FHIS OLD-
L E I G H
THIS TRADITION
G E N T L E M A N
H I M
B U T I TI S I M P O R T A N T ,
THE TRADITION
ASSOCIATES
O FT H E V I C T O R I A N
1
A N D N E W B Y
A Traveller's
O FH I S A U T O B I O G R A P H Y
T OA G R E E WITH HIM.
T OS E E N E W B Y ' S
CONTEMPORARIES
SITUATED M A N
OUT
FOR AS THE
N E W B Y
THE CELEBRATED SPECTACLES O F
M E R C E . . . V E N T U R E S T O SET FEET W H E R E F E W CIVILIZED ACE
I TIS P R E
A N A N T I Q U A T E D , B U T STILL P E R F E C T L Y S E R V I C E A B L E M Y T H — T H A T
THE ENGLISH G E N T L E M A N ABROAD THE TOURIST
IST O B E W E L C O M E D ;
T H A T I SR E S O L U T E L Y A N T I M O D E R N ,
DAYS
REPRESENTED
A N D ( D A M M I T ) L O W E R T Y P E S " ( P R E F A C E 12).
C I S E L Y B E C A U S E H E I S not
IN H I SW O R K
TRAVELLING
A L L T O O O F T E N , H I SC O U N T R Y M E N
IS THAT
THAN
O N E
YEARS T O O LATE; A N D N O T
O N L Y I NT H E S E N S E T H A T T H E F O R C E S O F M O D E R N T E C H N O L O G Y H A V E
CONSPIRED
TO SPOIL THE PLEASURES O F THE RUIN-SEEKING T R A V E L E R — T O RUIN H I S R U I N S — B U T A L S O B E C A U S E T H E M Y T H O F T H E E N G L I S H G E N T L E M A N H A S LOST ITS M O R A L FORCE.
D A V I D
TLEMAN, LONGER
C A S T R O N O V O ,
EXPRESSES A NI D E A L
I N H I S HISTORICAL
T H ED I L E M M A
O RM O D E L ,
WELL.
B U TINSTEAD
STUDY
O FT H E E N G L I S H
T H EE N G L I S H A P O P U L A R
N O
L O N G E R B ES E E N AESTHETIC
iH
A S " A FORCE FOR SOCIAL OBJECT"
(131).
1 0 1 mm I ' . W i l l i
LIKE
THE G E N T L E M A N C A N
COHESION,
N E W B Y ' S
IS N O
ENTERTAINMENT;
T H E L A N D E D ESTATE W I T H W H I C H H EISO F T E N A S S O C I A T E D ,
DELIGHTFUL
G E N
G E N T L E M A N
B U L RATHER
PERSISTENT
I Vl'l'WNITIIHS
NOSTALGIA
[AS] A IS A
THROWBACK
T O T H E LOST G L O R I E S O FE M P I R E — A N
C E S S F O R T H EI D E A
O FT H E G E N T L E M A N — B U T
A G E O FU N P A R A L L E L E D
N E W B Y
THE FACT THAT T H E E N G L I S H G E N T L E M A N A B R O A D , FOR
W H I C H
WORLD
H E STANDS,
D O N O T C U T M U C H
O FT H E LATE TWENTIETH
CENTURY.
TLEMEN C A N ONLY N O WB E H A V E CUMSTANCES M A R X
THAT
AS SUCH,
ARE MANIFESTLY
A N DTHE C O D E O F C O N D U C T
ICE I N T H ERAPIDLY
S I M O N
R A V E N
S U M S
C H A N G I N G
ITU P :
" G E N
O R B E TOLERATED AS SUCH,
CONTRIVED
O R U N R E A L "
(144).
I N CIR P E R H A P S
G O T I TR I G H T A F T E R ALL: T O R E P L A Y T H E H I S T O R Y O FT H E E N G L I S H
M A N
ABROAD,
MANLINESS,
I N A NA G EN O L O N G E R C O N D U C I V E
TO T H EIDEALS
GENTLE
O F GENTLE-
I ST O P L A Y I T O U TA S F A R C E .
C E R T A I N L Y , F A R C E P L A Y S A ROLE I NS E V E R A L C O N T E M P O R A R Y B R I T I S H NARRATIVES
SUC
RARELY LOSES SIGHT O F
THAT SELF-CONSCIOUSLY M A N I P U L A T E
TRAVEL
THE IMPERIALIST M Y T H O F THE
A B R O A D . N E W B Y ' S A Short Walk in the Hindu Kush (1958), Arabian Sands (1959), A N D , M O R E R E C E N T L Y , O ' H A N L O N ' S Into the Heart of Borneo (1984) A R E A L L P O S T W A R T R A V E L N A R R A T I V E S B Y Q U I N T E S -
G E N T L E M A N THESIGER'S
SENTIALLY
ENGLISH
WRITERS
THAT
TRADE
O N , B U T ALSO
PLAY
O N , WHAT T H E
A N T H R O P O L O G I S T R E N A T O R O S A L D O CALLS " I M P E R I A L I S T N O S T A L G I A . " IST N O S T A L G I A , FIED
M O D E
GIVEN
ACCORDING
O F ELEGIAC
TO R O S A L D O ,
PERCEPTION
T OS E N T I M E N T A L I Z E
DESCRIBES
THROUGH
T H EFORMER
W H I C H
RELATIONSHIP
THAT FOSTER THEIR PERCEPTIONS, CONTRIVE T O M O U R N THEY
THEMSELVES
H A V E
IRREVOCABLY
C O M M O D I -
W E S T E R N B E T W E E N
A N D ITS C O L O N I E S . S U C H P E O P L E , A N DT H E C U L T U R E I N D U S T R I E S
THAT
IMPERIAL
A PREVALENT,
P E O P L E A R E T H E E M P I R E
(FILM, T V , ETC.)
THE PASSING
O FA
ALTERED. A S R O S A L D O
WORLD
PUTS
IT
BLUNTLY: Imperialist
nostalgia
somebody,
a n dthen m o u r n s
revolves
around
a paradox:
the victim.
I n more
A
person
kills
attenuated
form,
s o m e o n e deliberately alters a f o r m o flife, a n d t h e n regrets t h a t
things
have n o t remained
as they were prior
t o the intervention.
A to n e
m o r e r e m o v e , people destroy their e n v i r o n m e n t , a n d then they
wor
ship n a t u r e . I n a n y o fits versions, imperialist nostalgia uses a p o s e o f "innocent
yearning" both
c o n c e a l its c o m p l i c i t y
IMPERIALIST NOSTALGIA C O M E S W H O
I NH A N D Y
C A ND E P L O Y IT T O M Y S T I F Y
YEARN
F O RT H E " S I M P L E R "
TLTISTRIAL—THAT SELVES HAVE
to capture
THEY
THEY,
NEED.
people's imaginations
with often brutal domination.
W A Y S
O F L I F E — O F T E N RURAL,
A N D THEIR METROPOLITAN
IMPERIALIST
M O D E
RESPONSIBILITY
O FWISTFUL
NOSTALGIA,
REMINISCENCE
FOR, A MYTHICIZED
AI
a n dto 2
FOR C O N T E M P O R A R Y TRAVEL
THEIR O W NE C O N O M I C M O T I V E S ,
T O D E P E N D O N A V I S I O N O FE M P I R E ;
PASTORAL
(69-70)
P R E M O D E R N ,
PREIN-
READERS, PERSUADE
T H E M
A SR O S A L D O
SEES IT,D O E S N O T
IT D E S C R I B E S A M O R E G E N E R A L I Z E D , THAT
SEEKS CONTROL OVER, B U T N O T
VERSION O FTHE PAST.
1 1 It l i l M I M H
WRITERS,
AS WELL AS TO
I NTHE WORK
O F SEV-
ERAL C O N T E M P O R A R Y
TRAVEL WRITERS,
ALLY PERTAINS T O E M P I R E :
H O W E V E R , THIS M Y T H I C I Z E D
ITATTEMPTS
( I M A G I N E D ) G L O R I E S , A N DT H E R E S U S C I T A T I O N NARY) "SUBORDINATE" WRITERS
LIKE
O FE M P I R E ' S
THESE
A R E AWARE,
THOUGH,
S I D E K I C K , T H EP O E T J A M E S
F E N T O N , E M B A R K
J U N G L E THAT ISALSO A J O U R N E Y BACK
INTO
THAT O N E O FO ' H A N L O N ' S
RAD, FOR HIS O W NTRAVEL NARRATIVES CALLS
" C O N R A D I A N
CLEARLY I NTHE NOVELLA THROUGH
NARRATIVE;
WORK,
THAT
THEIR
(IMAGI
THE AUTHOR A N D HIS
O N A M A D C A P
FAVORITE WRITERS
S U C C U M B
ATAVISM":
FORAY INTO T H E PAST. (ITIS
ISJ O S E P H
DISPLAYED
B Y WHICH A J O U R N E Y
B A C K W A R D
THROUGH TIME.)
B U TH E ISEQUALLY INTERESTED I NRE-CREATING A N D
TURY, AT LEAST A H U N D R E D
O FS A R A W A K
MOST
FORWARD
THERE ISA N EVOLUTIONARY THREAD TO O ' H A N L O N ' S
INHABITING THE COLONIAL ATMOSPHERE
C O N
ALLT O O EASILY T O W H A T R O B
T H E M E C H A N I S M ,
M O V E S
GESTURES A R E
A FONDLY REIMAGINED
Heart of Darkness,
SPACE SIMULTANEOUSLY
CONRAD'S
ERSTWHILE
ISA T U R N T O C O M E D Y — P A R T I C U
Into the Heart of Borneo,
LARLY FARCE. I N O ' H A N L O N ' S
N I X O N
ACTU FORMER
SUBJECTS.
B E L A T E D , A N D T H E RESULT I NT H E I R N A R R A T I V E S
NOT SURPRISING
PAST
THE RESTORATION O FE M P I R E ' S
3
A S I N JUNGLE
IMAGINATIVELY
I NTHE NINETEENTH
CEN
Y E A R S B E F O R E H I S O W NVISIT. O N E O FH I S M O D E L S
APPEARS T OB ETHE " G E N T L E M A N - A D V E N T U R E R " J A M E S B R O O K E , W H O ARRIVED, LIKE HIS LITERARY N A M E S A K E
L O R D J I M , I N S A R A W A K I NT H E
C E N T U R Y , P R O M P T L Y B E C A M E E M B R O I L E D I NA LOCAL W A R , HIS
O W NPRIVATE
4
K I N G D O M .
MID-NINETEENTH
A N D E N D E D U P WITH
B R O O K E W A S LATER S U C C E E D E D B Y H I S N E P H E W
C H A R L E S , A FORCEFUL L E A D E R W H O" G O V E R N E D S A R A W A K F O R FIFTY Y E A R S LIKE A COUNTRY GENTLEMAN M A N A G I N G B R O O K E S
W A S T OC O N T I N U E
{Borneo 14).
HISESTATES"
UNTIL
AFTER T H E S E C O N D
A N D THE LINE O F
W O R L D
W A R , W H E N
V Y N E R B R O O K E , U N D E R PRESSURE T OREBUILD, FINALLY C E D E D HISESTATE T O THE BRITISH C R O W N
(MOSES).
O ' H A N L O N
SEES THE B R O O K E S ' HISTORY AS
B E E N ONE, B Y A N D LARGE, O F BENEVOLENT PATERNALISM, TO
REVIVE
I N H I SO W N M U C H
LATER
EXPEDITION.
B U T A S H E DISCOVERS,
S A R A W A K ISA M U C H C H A N G E D PLACE SINCE THE DAYS PANY.
F O R O N E THING,
T H EC O U N T R Y — N O W
HAVING
A N ATTITUDE H E SEEKS
O FB R O O K E A N D C O M
A M E M B E R
O FTHE
MALAYSIAN
F E D E R A T I O N — H A S O N L Y T H E S L E N D E R E S T O F L I N K S T O ITSC O L O R F U L C O L O N I A L TORY;
A N D F O R ANOTHER,
RESPECT A M O N G
O ' H A N L O N
A N D F E N T O N ,
FAR F R O M
INSPIRING
THE LOCAL PEOPLE, ARE FIGURES O F FUN, ECCENTRIC BLUNDERERS,
THE BUTT O F M A N Y
A PRIVATE JOKE. O ' H A N L O N ' S
PATHETIC EFFORTS T O R E M I N D
S O M E LOCAL CHILDREN O F HIS ORIGINS ARE R E W A R D E D U N E X P E C T E D L Y :
I dislodged [a]sealed b a g o f picture-postcards o f the Q u e e n o n horse b a c k , T r o o p i n g t h e C o l o u r . . . . " L o o k , " I s a i d , " t h i s is f o r y o u . is o u r T u a i R u m a h , o u r c h i e f i n E n g l a n d . "
dren.
HIS
T h e cards were sheeny a n d metallic,
to
1 o n i t l H I'M W i l l i
"litglnng!" (hekind
said
that
I ViWKITItRS
Here
lite chil
eli.inno
(In
POSITION LIGHT.
O F T H E I R S U B J E C T S A S T H E I R O W N P O S I T I O N IS C H A N G E D A G A I N S T
...
I G A V E O N E T O A LITTLE B O Y .
D E L I G H T : H E T U R N E D IT T H I S W A Y
H E
L O O K E D A T IT W I T H
A N D T H A T ; H E S C R A T C H E D IT A N D W A I T E D
SEE W H A T W O U L D H A P P E N ; H E W H I P P E D MAJESTY F R O M THE BACK. SMALL
HANDS
DREN HAD O N E EACH, THE M E N WANTED
THRUST U P LIKE A C L U M P
REGISTERING
THE UNMITIGATED
MORE THAN ONE EACH. IN
FARCE O F SUCH
BY
COMMERCIAL
TOURISM.
THE LOCALS
BECAUSE
CAN
B E
AS
EXPLOITED;
ITSELF H A S
HIS
AWARE
THE M O R E
E N D E D , BUT
ITEMS,
COMPLICITY
HIS
THE
TOURIST
PRIVILEGED
STATUS
alibi AS
A
C E S S . I T IS N O
SURPRISE,
THEIR
WHICH THEY CAN MYSTIFYING
M A N Y
IS
O F COURSE, THAT FINANCIAL
IN HIDING
M A D E
TRAVELER-WRITERS,
W H O S E
O ' H A N L O N ,
THE PEOPLES THEY
M U C H O F
AN
SYMBOLIC
PROCESS,
AFFECTS
TO
TO
FOR SELF-DEPRE
F R O M
HIS
REVEAL
ARISING
METIER
AS
FINANCIAL ARE THE
"FAVORED M A Y
PRIVATE
ACCOUNTING
ARE NOT
THEIR READING
THE
JOURNEYS
STEADY
SUC
RELUCTANT M E A N S
B Y
O N
WELL
I N C O M E
ALONE
PUBLIC.
STATUS" B E
IN
A M O N G BUT
THIS
ENJOYED
BY
FINANCED
B Y
RICH
W H O
ARE
STILL
-BUT
THE MANUFACTURED
"HARDSHIPS"
FOR THE GENUINE P E N U R Y O F S O M E
O F
ENCOUNTER.
S E E N IN THIS LIGHT, T H E RATHER LESS E N D E A R I N G , A N D
FIGURE
CONTEXT, HIS
O F THE GENTLEMAN ABROAD
RATHER M O R E
THE TRAVELER-WRITER FROM
B E C O M E S
B Y
TO CAPITALIZE
THEY EXPERIENCE WITHOUT
CISELY,
SO
H E
TRAVEL WRITERS
A N D
THEIR FACE F R O M
GIVEN,
POSTIMPERIAL
O F
TOURIST
WITH THIS
SYSTEM
PROPENSITY
O F PRODUCTION,
CONSPICUOUS
S P O N S O R S — O R
L E D
NOT
CONSIDERABLE
MOST
MOTIVES,
CONDITIONS
CORPORATE LIKE
A
AFFORD THEIR LIVES O F RELATIVE LEISURE. T R A V E L NARRATIVES,
THEIR O W N
LITERARY W O R K S SITUATION
O W N
IS
THE TRAPPINGS
TRAVELER A N D
A M E T I E R THAT HAS B R O U G H T H I M
DISCUSS
A N D
FORCES
FOR HIS EXCESSES: EXCESSES
TRAVEL WRITER,
TO
AS
EXCHANGE.
WITH
CATION A N D SELF-PARODY PROVIDE AN F R O M
E N C O U N
B E C O M E THE
IT C O U L D B E A R G U E D , IS W E L L A C Q U A I N T E D
O F HIS
WELL,
VANISH,
BECAUSE
C O N V E R T E D INTO TOURISTIC
D E S P I S E . Y E T IT C O U L D A L S O B E A R G U E D T H A T H I S
BOTH
(62-63)
IMPERSONAL
K N O W
M E M E N T O S
O F A PROCESS O F EXPLOITATIVE
O ' H A N L O N , WELL
O ' H A N L O N ,
THE E M P I R E
IMPERIAL PAST, N O W MARKERS
MIN
T H E G A P B E T W E E N HIS P E R S O N A L V I S I O N O F T H E E M P I R E
O F A PRESENT FASHIONED
SUCH,
CHIL
FIVE
"CROSS-CULTURAL"
THE REALITIES
AS
BAM
DEFLATES HIS S E L F - A P P O I N T E D ROLE AS G R E A T C O N C I L I A T O R ,
WELL AS S H O W I N G
AND,
OF
A PILE FOR HERSELF. I F THE
UTES, FOUR H U N D R E D M E M E N T O E S O F THE E M P I R E DISAPPEARED.
IN
TO
IT O V E R , T O C A T C H A G L I M P S E O F H E R
BOO; THE OLD W O M A N , A N N O Y E D , WANTED
TERS, O ' H A N L O N
THE
AMAZED
MIGHT
STARTS TO
LOOK
LIKE A STRATEGY D E S I G N E D TO
PRO-
FURTHER HARM. WELL
A P P E A R
LICENSE LO P E R F O R M .
I L I E N U RRU L I V E S O F I'.RIC N E W B Y :
Al
I II'
A
WRITER,
I MI'ltM
T H E GENTLEMAN ABROAD, RIDICULOUS;
N O W H E R E LIKE
',1
BUT
RIDICULE,
IN
IS T H I S C L E A R E R T H A N
O ' H A N L O N ,
W H O
A
PRE
SEEMS
IN TO
CATER
T OA N (UPPER)
O ' H A N L O N ,
N E W B Y
SYSTEM
ISQUITE
A N D
AFFORDS.
O N E
B O U N D
IDEA
DECLARES
O F
TOAST,
AT
THE
" A S
OUTSET
O F O N E
RELISH
R E A D E R S — H E HAS
SUCCESSFUL WITHIN
TRAVEL
TEA
A N D
PUBLISHED
O F "CRUMPETS
NARRATIVES—OWES
POT,
T OHIS
A N D B Y R O N , HIS O B V I O U S
ONLY A
C O M M O N O F P .G
POPULARITY
A M O N G
A S A WRITER
WORKING
IT OWES
TO
M O D E L S , TO A N IDEAL O F THE
P L E — A M I N O R CLASSIC IN P O S T W A R A N G L O P H O N E TRAVEL A N D
HIS C O M P A N I O N ,
CARLESS, I NTHE R E M O T E M O U N T A I N IT I SP R O B A B L Y N E W B Y ' S EXAMINATION FIGURE,
A N D
O F THE (ENGLISH) THE M Y T H O L O G Y
T H E
THAT
SURROUNDS
WARNS
KABOULISTAN
(7).
F U R O N
REQUIREMENT.
F O R O N E THING,
BRIEF BUT
HILARIOUSLY
EXPEDITION, N E W B Y
A TRUTH B R O U G H T
K N O W E D G E
SUSPICIOUSLY
EXACERBATED
UNCERTAIN
TANCE TO FAKE ADVICE. TAGE; O N
ORGANISEE ET P O U R V U E
O N THE
CARLESS
1
ARE BOTH
SESSION"
I N WALES,
L I K E L A U G H T E R " (33).
RELIANCE
THAT
N E W B Y
DURING
W H E R E
I ' 1 1 Ml VI !« W i l l i
GUIDEBOOKS,
THEIR SINGULAR O F THIS A S A A N D
1 vi'i;wnn ( U N
TO A
THEIR
SHEEP . . .
N O R D O THEY A P P E A R
O NOUTDATED
SEES A N Y
A N D
NEITHER
NOVICES
TO T H E M
A D E
HAUTE
K U S H
FULFILLS
" AF L O C K O F M O U N T A I N
THE CONTRARY, H E S E E M S TO EXULT I NHIS O W N
1/
H I N D U
UNFORTUNATELY,
O F T H E LOCAL L A N G U A G E S , A N D N O T
EXPLORING I N
IMPOSTURE.
T H E P L A C E T H E Y P L A N TO VISIT: A L A C K O F
B Y THEIR
C O M M A N D
BIEN
A N D
EVENTFUL "TRAINING
A GREAT DEAL ABOUT
A N D
PAINFULLY H O M E
B U M B L I N G EFFORTS ARE PRESIDED O V E R B Y M A K I N G SOUNDS
ASIA.
SUSTAINED
F U R O N PROVIDES THE EPIGRAPH FOR
I N H I SB O O K
N E W B Y ' S
CLIMBING:
H U G H
P O U R TENTER L'ETUDE D E CETTE REGION D E
M O N T A G N E , "
M O U N T A I N
DIPLOMAT I NC E N T R A L
IT,A R E W O R T H
ANACHRONISM,
U N E EXPEDITION
M O Y E N S MATERIELS PUISSANTS
THE P U K K A
I TA L S O R E P R E S E N T S H I S M O S T
F R E N C H EXPLORER R A Y M O N D " I I FAUDRAIT
O F
E X A M
G E N T L E M A N TRAVELER. T H R E E ASPECTS O F THIS
M O R E DETAIL HERE: AMATEURISM,
Short Walk:
OUT
WRITING-CHRONICLES
COUNTRY O F NURISTAN
BEST B O O K ;
HIS
FOR B E I N G D A T E D B U T THAT IS
because I T I S A Short Walk in the Hindu Rush (1958), F O R
THE EXPLOITS O F N E W B Y
.
COMMERCIALLY
IRONICALLY CELEBRATED, FOR THE S A M E REASON, PRECISELY DATE. T H E EARLY W O R K
THE
BUTTERED
O F
C O P Y
PARTICULARLY,
E C C E N T R I C G E N T L E M A N T R A V E L E R T H A T I SM O C K E D
O N
W H O ,
A D O Z E N
SKILL
M O R E
CLASS-
H E WRYLY
A N D
BUCKETS
N E W B Y ' S
THAN
LIKE
SYSTEM
JOURNEYS, A RIDE
A P A P E R B A C K
M O R E
THE GENRE'S A C C E P T E D CLICHES.
REVERSION VIA W A U G H
B U N , "
CAN QUIBBLE WITH A M A N
{Big Red Train Ride 10, 89).
W O D E H O U S E ? " BRITISH
O F HIS
THE
THOROUGHLY
A S A B A T H
I NA J U M B O - S I Z E D
ORANGE-COLOURED ENGLISH
A L S O
PRIVATE-SCHOOL
THE ENTITLEMENTS
BRITISH
E X P R E S S — A N D W H O
PUBLIC.
ELITIST
IS A NI D E A L I Z E D ,
HIS J O U R N E Y , IS A L R E A D Y D R E A M I N G
G E N T L E M A N ' S
SWEET,
READING
O F E N G L A N D ' S
P R E P A R E D TO PUBLICIZE
ENGLISHNESS:
HIMSELF
INTO
ENGLISH
O F THESE ENTITLEMENTS
TRANS-SIBERIAN D A Y
MIDDLE-CLASS IS THE PRODUCT
TO
KNOWL THEIR RELUC
DISADVAN
CNRLESS'S
TUNA-
teurism, taking the opportunity to set—and send—himself u p as the latest in a long line o f colorful E u r o p e a n explorers, each equipped with grandiose imperial visions o f adventure and conquest, but little else besides. O f course, N e w b y and Carless are better prepared than they would have us believe; but rather than lend his expedition an aura o f gravitas or expertise, N e w b y chooses to depict it, along with himself, as foolishly, even dangerously, amateurish. T h e amateurism o f the English gentleman abroad—the m a n lack ing in expertise, but schooled for all eventualities—is a fitting subject for parody; but it also confers a paradoxical authority on the tweedy traveler, allowing him to see his egregious errors and violations o f local custom as signs o f his own w a y w a r d munificence. A m a t e u r i s m also provides a spurious form o f self-protection; for unlike professional ethnographers, whose participant-observation cannot help but create a certain complicity between themselves and the culture they are describ ing, adventure-seeking travelers m a y persuade themselves that they are free to indulge in an "innocent" enthusiasm for the wonders they 5
behold. These wonders are often held up as the objects o f a naive or untutored curiosity; but in another sense, it is a paradoxical lack o f curiosity that governs such travelers' endeavors. G a p i n g at the marvels of "foreign" peoples and cultures, they are apt nonetheless to assimi late them to a E u r o p e a n
frame o f reference, thereby
reinstating
Europe—or, in the case o f the gentleman, E n g l a n d — a s the ultimate arbiter o f cultural value. N e w b y ' s travel narrative consciously places itself within this self-privileging tradition. Discovery—itself a powerful European m y t h — t a k e s second place to nostalgic reminiscence; and as a self-styled "literary traveler," w h a t N e w b y is reminded o f most often is b o o k s . K i p l i n g l o o m s large, as does Buchan; avoiding the dull preci sion o f technical j a r g o n , N e w b y directs his attention instead to the vivid images o f heroic myth. A s Philip M a s o n and D a v i d C a s t r o n o v o , a m o n g others, have argued, the m y t h o f the English gentleman has not only been sustained b y literature; it has also been actively produced b y il. By surrounding himself with images o f previous gentlemen-explor ers, mostly from nineteenth-century literature, N e w b y w o r k s toward conferring mythic status on himself. T h e pratfalls o f the amateur cor respond to a kind o f definitional gaucherie; like its mountain-climbing protagonists, the narrative itself frequently slips: most often between categories o f fact ( N e w b y as professional travel writer) and categories of fiction ( N e w b y as "legendary adventurer"). In the process, Nuristan lakes on the configurations of an invented country
Al'TKK
KMI'lltl'
11
a playground, like
L O R D
JIM'S ISLAND
D O M ,
F O R T H E A C T I N G O U T O FS E L F - A G G R A N D I Z I N G B U TU L T I M A T E L Y S E L F - D E F E A T
ING IMPERIAL IN
RETREAT O R C A R N E H A N
K E E P I N G WITH MOST
NINETEENTH CENTURY.
" N E W "
M O U N T A I N
KING
FANTASIES.
MATTER, WITH O ' H A N L O N ' S ) , THE
A N D DRAVOT'S
ISTANBUL
I NT H E
I
O F N E W B Y ' S
TRAVEL NARRATIVES
A Short Walk I S P E P P N A Traveller's Life,
FIFTIES,
N E W B Y
FINDS
(AS, F O R THAT
E R E D WITH REFERENCES TO DURING
A VISIT
T O T H E
HIMSELF E C H O I N G T H E SENTI
M E N T S O FA N O B S C U R E V I C T O R I A N T R A V E L E R , T H E R E V E R E N D W A L S H , W H O H A D VISITED
T H E " O L D "
W A L S H
CONSTANTINOPLE
OVER
A CENTURY
BEFORE H I M .R E V .
H A D F E A R E D THAT T H E B E A U T I E S O FC O N S T A N T I N O P L E W O U L D
B E TRANSITORY. F O R N E W B Y ,
PROVE T O
THESE FEARS ARE CONFIRMED; CASTING A SORROW
F U L E Y E O N T H E R A P I D L Y M O D E R N I Z I N G C I T Y O FI S T A N B U L , H E C A N O N L Y T H E FACT THAT H E H A S B E E N B O R N
Short Walk NISCENCE.
IS M A R K E D
R E A D I N G
" A H U N D R E D YEARS TOO LATE"
M O U R N
(161-62). A
THROUGHOUT B Y A SIMILAR T O N E O F PLANGENT
A TTIMES
ALMOST
LIKE
A NINVENTORY
REMI
O F ORIENTALIST
M Y T H S , T H E NARRATIVE ISS U F F U S E D WITH A F F E C T I O N A T E M E M O R I E S O F BRITAIN'S CIVILIZING M I S S I O N I NTHE EAST. T H E H E A D Y D A Y S O F THE R A J , ALAS, ARE OVER. A T M E S H E D , I N NORTHEAST PERSIA, THE OPULENT CONSULATE BUILDING W A S
lost
a n d forgotten;
arcades
o f Corinthian
columns
supported
a n
u p p e r b a l c o n y , itself collapsing. T h e h o u s e w a ss h a d e d b y great trees, planted
most
magnificent.
B e h i n d b a r r e d w i n d o w s w e r e t h e b i g green safes w i t h
perhaps
a century
a g o ,n o w a t their
combination
l o c k s i n t h ec o n f i d e n t i a l registry.
N E W B Y
ASKS
(57)
CARLESS H O W O N EARTH T H ECONSULATE'S F O R M E R
H A D M A N A G E D T O GET THE SAFES INTO THE BUILDING. D A Y S O F T H E R A JY O U C O U L D D O A N Y T H I N G "
OCCUPANTS
CARLESS'S REPLY: " I N THE
(57).
T H I S H A L F - P A R O D I C T R I B U T E T O T H E P A S T , S T R A I G H T O U TO F K I P L I N G NILIA,
TYPIFIES
THROUGHOUT ANCED,
T H ET O N E
N E W B Y ' S
NARRATIVES.
ANACHRONISM
ATTEMPTS
INTO
T OC O N V I N C E
MAINTAINED
SELF-MOCKERY IS COUNTERBAL
H O W E V E R , B YSELF-EXONERATION. B YTURNING
STUFF O FL E G E N D A N D M Y T H N E W B Y
O FSELF-MOCKING
TRAVEL
JUVE
H I S TRAVELS INTO T H E
A SERIES O F G E N T L E M A N ' S
A D V E N T U R E S —
HIMSELF A N DH I S READERS THAT
HIS EXPERI
E N C E S H A V E LITTLE SOCIAL C O N S E Q U E N C E . T H I S D E T E R M I N A T I O N T O T R I V I A L I Z E I S REMINISCENT SAYS S U S A N (116). C A M P
O FTHE SENTIMENTS
O F
camp.
S O N T A G I NA W E L L - K N O W N
" T H E WHOLE POINT
INDIGNATION"
EXCUSABLE:
SERIOUS"
ISP L A Y F U L , A N T I S E R I O U S , V I G O R O U S L Y A P O L I T I C A L ; B U TA S S O N T A G
P O I N T S O U T , ITA L S O F U N C T I O N S A S A " S O L V E N T O F M O R A L I T Y MORAL
O F C A M P , "
ESSAY, "IS TODETHRONE THE
(118).
C A M P
M A Y B E DISRUPTIVE,
T H E" O U T R A G E O U S " B E H A V I O R
11
IL S P A W N S
[THAT] NEUTRALIZES B U T IT IS A L W A Y S
IS PRIMARILY
n n i K i M • wi'iii 1 vI'l'WHil 1 u
COIILUCLIC
A N D SHOULD B E J U D G E D — O R RATHER, SHOULD NOT B E
JUDGED—ACCORDINGLY.
C A M P , FINALLY, P R O P O S E S " A C O M I C VISION O F THE WORLD TER O R P O L E M I C A L
C O M E D Y .
. . . BUT NOT A
M E N T , C O M E D Y IS A N E X P E R I E N C E O F U N D E R - I N V O L V E M E N T ,
(116).
(IT
IS I N T E R E S T I N G T O S P E C U L A T E H E R E H O W
BRITISH TRAVEL WRITING HAS
ITS R O O T S I N C A M P :
MOST OBVIOUS PRECURSORS, W A U G H
M U C H
N E W B Y ' S
TRAVEL
NARRATIVES,
VISION O F THE W O R L D — M O R E
O F
DETACHMENT"
TWENTIETH-CENTURY
THE WORK
O F N E W B Y ' S
C A M P
THE M E D I U M
ENTERTAINMENT WHILE
OUS DISENGAGEMENT. T H E GENTLEMAN ABROAD, ALWAYS
O F C A M P .
UNREALITY
O N
IS
HIS
SURROUNDINGS?
NURISTAN, N E W B Y OF H I G H NOT
A N D CARLESS
R O M A N C E .
ALWAYS
M E M O R A B L E
THE GENTLEMAN
HIMSELF
SHORT FIND
CLAIMING A
IN
MELODRAH E
CONFER
THE MOUNTAINS
THE GENTLEMAN'S
O F
THEATRICAL O F CIRCUMSTANCES
EXPECTATIONS
O F DEFERENCE.
CAN
IN
O N E
SCENE, FOR E X A M P L E , THE FRAUDULENT HEROICS O F N E W B Y
A N D
CARLESS ARE MERCILESSLY E X P O S E D B Y THE LOCAL NURISTANIS,
W H O
O N T H E T W O H A P L E S S A D V E N T U R E R S AS T H E Y P R E P A R E TO SET U P AS
SPURI
IT E A S I E R T O B R E A T H E I N T H E R A R E F I E D A I R
Y E T E V E N THE MOST
M A T C H
A
A G O O D SUBJECT FOR
UNREAL, OR DOES
O F BREATH
FOR
W O R L D —
PARODY, TURNS INTO AN E V E N BETTER O N E FOR THE " U N C O M M I T T E D " MATICS
O F
O ' H A N L O N . )
PROVIDES
SPECIFICALLY, A VISION O F THE FOREIGN
THAT SEEKS TO P R O M O T E HARMLESS
TWO
A N D B Y R O N , IS C A M P , A S IS T H E W O R K
HIS T W O CLOSEST C O N T E M P O R A R I E S , C H A T W I N A N D IN
BIT
I F T R A G E D Y IS A N E X P E R I E N C E O F H Y P E R - I N V O L V E
THE NEWS
O F O U R ARRIVAL
SPREAD, THE SMART
CONVERGE
C A M P :
YOUNG M E N
OF
TOWN
B E G A N TO ARRIVE. H A L F A D O Z E N O F THE M O S T E L E G A N T SEATED THEMSELVES O N A LARGE ROCK A N D WATCHED US LANGUIDLY. L I K E M E M B E R S SOCIETY, THEY WERE DRESSED RATHER F O P P I S H L Y — B I G D E R E D WAISTCOATS,
SILVER M E D A L S A N D L U C K Y C H A R M S .
A R M E D WITH A D O U B L E STRINGED STONE BOW.
OF THE E T O N
FLAT C A P S ,
EMBROI
O N E OF THEM
WAS
F R O M T I M E TO T I M E H E DIS
C H A R G E D A P E B B L E AT T H E L I Z A R D S T H A T C R A W L E D O V E R T H E F A C E O F T H E CLIFF. B E F O R E T H E S E A L O O F D A N D I E S A N D A N A U D I E N C E O F A T L E A S T FIFTY L E S S E R M E N WE
HOBBLED
HOUSEHOLD
BACKWARDS
AND
CHORES, LIKE
. EXPERIMENTAL THEATRE.
BUT
E V E N IN
M A Y AS
SOME
PERFORMING INTERMINABLE
AS THIS O N E , W H E R E
OUR
MUNDANE
DRAMA
THE TABLES ARE
A N D CARLESS, A N D THEY ARE M A D E
CROUSNESS O F THEIR O W N DISCOURAGE
IN
IN
APPARENTLY
TO CONFRONT THE
A F F E C T A T I O N S , T H E S T A G E IS S E T I N S U C H A W A Y
SERIOUS J U D G M E N T .
T H E
BRAVURA
O F THE GENTLEMAN
B E NEATLY DEFLATED, A N D THE " E V I D E N C E " O F HIS SUPERIORITY FLAGRANT
IMPOSTURE,
AN
(208)
SCENES SUCH
TURNED O N N E W B Y
FORWARDS,
ACTORS
BUT
WE
ARE NOT
ASKED
T O — A R E ASKED
A I ' T I M llMI'IIO'
T O P A R A D E ITS O W N
I
TO
ABROAD REVEALED
NOT
CARRY T H E CRITICISM T O O FAR. S E L F - P A R O D Y OFFERS SELF-PROTECTION: IN A RATIVE THAT S E E M S TO F A K E E V E R Y O P P O R T U N I T Y
LUDIAS
T O — NAR
FRIVOLITY,
N E W B Y
HIDES
HIS RESPONSIBILITIES
FACADE O F WRY H U M O R W O R K
A N D K N O W I N G
ISF O L L O W I N G I NA TRADITION
TURING A N D ITY.
C A M P
SELF-INFLICTED WIT ISTHE PRIMARY
G E N T L E M A N A B R O A D — A
M A S K
WORK
TRAVEL
C A M P . INTO
B U T
THE
N E W B Y
W O R K
W H O ,
A N D
INTO
D A N D I E S
ARE A B U N D A N T
ENGLISH
Y E A R S T O O L A T E , STILL P R E Y
THE FINEST O F BRITAIN'S
O ' H A N L O N
CONSCRIPT
C H A T W I N
C A M P
IS M U C H
AESTHETICS M O R E
dandy:
THE
THE WORLDLY
travel writer,
TERM
TREATISE
O NTHE
PLEASURES
O F
IMPRES
LUXURIANT
T H R O U G H O U T C H A T W I N ' S FICTION:
gonia,
DECAY.
THE ITINERANT
TRAVEL WRITING.
O F ALL H I S W O R K S
H E
ALWAYS
PERHAPS ONLY THE
FALLS R E A D I L Y I N T O T H E C A T E G O R Y O F A TRAVEL B O O K .
LESS, W A S INANT
O F DEFINING
A N D
THE GREATEST PASSION
M E T A P H O R
Patagonia)
I NHIS I M M A C U L A T E
OR TRYING OUT DILETTANTISH
OF THE H U M A N
SPECIES
LANGUIDLY ELEGANT ENERGY
DIVERSE B O D Y
UNRIVALED
B E T W E E N ART A N D
HIS
A N Y THE
TRAVEL, N O N E T H E THE
D O M H E IS
M O L E S K I N
C H A T W I N
PEERS. THIS
O F THE D A N D Y ,
N O T E B O O K S
(In
THE N O M A D I C
ORIGINS
CUTS
ALMOST
COMBINATION
AS IST H E A P P A R E N T
LIFE T H R O U G H O U T HIS
CLOSELY WITHIN THE TRADITION T O
(1977) AS
In Pata
FIRST,
A WITTY,
WORK.
FINALLY,
O F WIT
O F THE TRAVELER'S TALE.
A N D
ELE
INTERCHANGEABILITY THE W I L D E A N
TENCE O N THE AESTHETIC V A L U E O F LYING ISA P P R O P R I A T E TO A WRITER
A
TWO
E V E N AS H E C A R E E N S F R O M P L A C E T O P L A C E W I T H A N
A M O N G
G A N C E ISREMINISCENT
R E G G I E HIS
O F WORK.) W H E T H E R
THEORIES O N
(The Songlines),
FIGURE
ART-
M A N O E L
DISLIKED
I NC H A T W I N ' S LIFE, A N D ITR E M A I N S
T H R O U G H O U T HIS
R E C O R D I N G HIS OBSERVATIONS
C O N
AESTHETE
CONVERTS HIS
(Utz, 1988); T H E D E C A D E N T S L A V E - T R A D E R F R A N C I S C O D A S I L V A (The Viceroy of Oiudah, 1980); T H E E T O N I A N B A C H E L O R B I C K E R T O N (On the Black Hill, 1982); A N D , A B O V E A L L , H I M S E L F I N M O S T O B V I O U S L Y A U T O B I O G R A P H I C A L T R A V E L N A R R A T I V E S , In Patagonia A N D The Songlines (1987). ( C H A T W I N ' S W O R K S H O W S , A S C L E A R L Y THE DIFFICULTY
POST
SPIRIT O F
COLLECTOR U T Z
ONE'S,
TO
AS A F O R M O F ART. H E N C E T H E C O N F L A T I O N I N
T H E G L O B E I NS E A R C H O F S T I M U L A T I O N ,
A W I L D E A N
DISSIMULATIONS;
T OTHE M I S C H I E V O U S
NOSTALGIA,
B E T W E E N THE G E N T L E M A N A N D
W A N D E R I N G
SIONS
ARGUABLY INDEBTED
SERVICE O F IMPERIALIST
SCIOUSLY C O N C E R N E D WITH C A M P HIS
POS
SUPERIOR
GRANDEUR?
IS SIMILARLY
WHEREAS
FOR THESE H U M O R O U S
A
N E W B Y ' S
THAN THE LATE-TWENTIETH-CENTURY
O F BRUCE CHATWIN,
WRITERS,
I NTHIS S E N S E ,
A RESIDUAL FEELING O F MORAL
B O R N A H U N D R E D
FITFUL D E L U S I O N S O F I M P E R I A L T H E
AESTHETICISM.
M E D I U M
M A N
TRAVEL WRITER B E H I N D
O F E N G L I S H T R A V E L W R I T I N G I NW H I C H
A N D WHAT COULD B E M O R E C A M P
WAR
AS TRAVELER A N D
INSIS
WORKING
6
SEE C H A T W I N AS A TRAVELING D A N D Y — O R TO R E C O G N I Z E HIS W O R K A S
DANDIFIED
B E T W E E N E M B O D I E D
TRAVEL
THE D A N D Y
AESTHETICS A N D
B YT H E S E T W O
td
RAISES
THE
QUESTION
THE G E N T L E M A N , A N D HEAVILY
MYTHICIZED
loi'UIXTN w
O F THE
BETWEEN
DIFFERENCE
THE SOCIAL
CODES
FIGURES. O N E ACCOUNT
O F L H E
•yi'lrWMITflK.N
DISTINCTION ISP R O V I D E D STYLES
O FVICTORIAN
"CONTRADICTION SYSTEM
B Y J A M E S
I NH I S S T U D Y O F C O N F L I C T I N G
B O O K
D O M I N A N C E
SETS O U TT O E X P L O R E
B Y W H I C H THE S A M E
G E N D E R
ALSO CALLED INTO Q U E S T I O N T H E
IDENTITY,
SOUGHT
T O R E S O L V E IT B YA P P E A L I N G T O M O D E L S O F
INCLUDING
THE GENTLEMAN A N D THE DANDY.
T H E S E T W O
LATTER M O D E L S W E R E W I D E L Y
UNDERSTOOD AS REPRESENTING A N "ASCETIC
M E N "
O N SELF-DISCIPLINE
THAT
ATTRIBUTE NOTABLY
A
O F INTELLECTUAL L A B O R " (I). SEVERAL WRITERS O F THE P E R I O D , ALERT
TO THIS CONTRADICTION, MASCULINE
A D A M S ' S
WITHIN VICTORIAN PATRIARCHY,
THAT U N D E R W R O T E M A L E
'MANLINESS'
E L IA D A M S
MASCULINITY.
LAID
EMPHASIS
B U T WHEREAS
(2).
C A R L Y L E — A S
A S A DISTINCTLY
T H E G E N T L E M A N
A P A R A G O N
W A S REGARDED
O F SINCERITY,
T H ED A N D Y
REGI
MASCULINE B Y S O M E —
E M E R G E D A SA
FIGURE T O O THEATRICAL F O R H I S O W NG O O D . T H E D A N D Y THUS B E C A M E A FIGURE FOR THE VERY CONTRADICTIONS
H E W A S INTENDED TO RESOLVE: A REMINDER O F
THE D E C A D E N C E THREATENING VICTORIAN LENGE
T O T H EH O N O R
STANCE. A S A D A M S As
O FTHE " T R U E "
C O D E S O FETHICS,
G E N T L E M A N
B U T ALSO A
CHAL
A SA M A N O FM O R A L
SUB
EXPLAINS,
t h eideal o f the gentleman b r o a d e n e d [during t h enineteenth cen
t u r y ] , . . . it a l s o g a v e n e w m o r a l u r g e n c y t o t h e . . . t a s k o f d i s t i n guishing b e t w e e n sincerity a n d p e r f o r m a n c e . I f the status o f the
gen
t l e m a n is n o t s e c u r e d b y i n h e r i t e d d i s t i n c t i o n s o f f a m i l y a n d r a n k , b u t is r e a l i z e d i n s t e a d t h r o u g h b e h a v i o r , h o w d o e s o n e d i s t i n g u i s h t h e " t r u e " g e n t l e m a n f r o m t h e a s p i r a n t w h o i s m e r e l y a c t i n g t h e p a r t ? (53) T H I S
ANXIETY
ISREFLECTED, AS W E H A V E
O ' H A N L O N , BOTH TICITY, M A S C U L I N E A N D
W H O TURN
VIRTUE,
INTO
O F W H O M
HARK BACK
PROWESS—THAT
O FN E W B Y A N D
T O A M O D E L — O F SINCERITY,
AUTHEN
THEY RECOGNIZE A S N O LONGER
T H EGENTLEMAN-ADVENTURER,
HIS "FALLEN"
PERFORMING CLOWN.
M O D E R N
T H EPARAGON
COUNTERPART,
O F
POSSIBLE,
MASCULINE
T H ETRAVELING D A N D Y A S
I NC H A T W I N ' S W O R K , H O W E V E R , THIS F O R M U L A IS G I V E N
A N O T H E R TWIST. F O R T H E D A N D Y ,
perated
S E E N , I N T H EW O R K
AS A N ADMIRABLE
FIGURE:
recu
FAR F R O M B E I N G S E E N A S " F A L L E N , " IS HISPERFORMATIVE
QUALITIES ARE A VIRTUE,
AS IS H I S F O P P I S H N E S S , A S A R E H I S LIES. T A K E L O U I S R O U G E M O N T ( A K A H E N R I G R E E N ) ,
THE PERIPATETIC
" F R E N C H SAVANT"
I N
In Patagonia:
AUTHOR O F A
LEARNED TREATISE O NVIRGINITY; PERPETRATOR O F A SCANDALOUS, A N D THEREFORE BEST-SELLING, AUTOBIOGRAPHY; " T H E
A N DLATER STAR I NH I S O N E - M A N
GREATEST LIAR O N E A R T H "
{In Patagonia
167-69).
ROAD
SHOW,
CHATWIN'S
NARRA
TIVES A R E D E N S E L Y P O P U L A T E D W I T H L O V A B L E R O G U E S LIKE THIS O N E : M E N A N D , SOMETIMES, WHOSE
W O M E N
W H O MANIPULATE
PERFORMANCES, DRAWING
I RAVEL LIAR, R E M A I N AUDIENCE THE
OTHER
O N IH E B E S T
U N E N C U M B E R E D
B Y T H EB A N A L
TRUTH.
S\mW.
PEOPLE'S
TRADITION
HMi'lHI
1
17
CREDULITY,
A N D
O FTHE TRAVELERA S
OBLIGATION
T O TELL
THEIR
F O R C H A T W I N , THE ITINERANT STORYTELLER ISB O T H A N O M A D TOR. N O M A D I S M DESCRIBES SOCIETY
I N CHATWIN'S WORK
IS BOTH
THE PLEASURES O F M O V E M E N T C H A T W I N
TENDS
ANARCHISTS,
EXILES, A N D
SIONS,
FLIGHTS
THE
B E Y O N D
T OSYMPATHIZE,
O U T L A W S — B U T
A CREED A N D
IT ALSO GIVES A N A M E
DRAMATIZES
O F THE WORLD'S
A TENSION
T OA C Q U I R E , E X H I B I T ,
INGS
THAT
DISPLAY
" M U S E U M A N D
A N D R E
WITHOUT
OBJECTS
DETACHED,
THE
CHATWIN'S
DELECTATION
F R O M
O W N
A N D
I N CONTACT.
THE
T H E
W I L D E A N
I N THE
DANDY'S
B U T CONVENIENTLY
ABOUT
C H A T W I N ' S
O F DETACHMENT,
SOCIETIES
A N D
O F MORAL
CULTURES
HYPERCONSCIOUS
LIT
RETREATING
WITH
POSTURING
HIMSELF
W H I C H H E IS A USEFUL
PERFORMATIVE LICENSE A N D A DILETTANTE'S
W H I M .
J U D G M E N T ;
SENSE O F THE CONNOISSEUR
J U D G E N O R B E J U D G E D FOR HIS O W N ,
A F R E E D O M TO ASSIMILATE
M O S T
HIS
O F ALL, IT LIBERATES H I M
FOR THE
D A N D Y — A T
O F AESTHETIC
LEAST I N THE
OBJECTS- -IS
OR OTHERS', ETHICAL
NEITHER T O
STANDARDS.
INSTEAD,
HIS TASK ISTO A P P R E C I A T E BEAUTIFUL THINGS W H E R E V E R H E SEES T H E M ; A N D RESULT,
FOR THE
A
I NWHICH FOREIGN PEOPLES
DELIGHTED,
T H E ILLUSION
EXPERIENCE T OAESTHETIC B U R D E N
A N D
T O RESEMBLE
DELIVER THEMSELVES U PA S AES
R A N G E O F I D E A S A N D O P T I O N S ; ITALSO G I V E S H I M
F R O M
C O M E S
O T H E R P E O P L E ' S STORIES, H E SEEKS TO PROTECT
RHETORICAL STRATEGY: ITGRANTS H I M
PERSONAL
FOR FOREIGN CULTURES; T O
8
CLOSER I N V O L V E M E N T
C O M E S
O FA
PAS
IS REGISTERED I N WRIT
IS O F C O U R S E A CERTAIN D I S I N G E N U O U S N E S S
HIS
E S C A P E —
THE F R E N C H NOVELIST
W O R K
A NO P E N EXHIBITION
ERARY ENTERPRISE; FOR I NPURSUING B E H I N D
PASSION
ADMIRED,
T H E STORIES T H E Y OFFER,
FOR
SPECTATOR.
T H E R E
THAT
APPRECIATION
H E M U C H
M A L R A U X ,
WALLS":
CHATWIN'S
THE CENTRIFUGAL FORCES O F
COLLECT. A N D
A CONNOISSEUR'S
CULTURES, A N D
THETIC
IF THE TRAVELER/STORYTELLER IS
THE CENTRIPETAL FORCES O F RETRIEVAL—THE
A PHRASE F R O M A M A N
HISTORIAN
7
DIGRES
CHARACTERIZE
(TALL) TALES. I N THIS S E N S E ,
B E T W E E N
I M P U L S E — A N D
SION
ART
TO THE
WITH
CEASELESSLY I NSEARCH O F STONES, T H E N H E ISALSO A COLLEC
TOR, A NA C C U M U L A T O R
ADAPT
O F "SETTLED"
ROMANTICALLY,
O F FANCY A N D IMPROVISATIONAL FORAYS, THAT
A TYPE O F N O M A D ,
THE N O M A D I C
THE B O U N D S
S O M E W H A T
THE RESTLESSNESS O F M U C H O F HIS WRITTEN W O R K .
WORK
A N D A COLLEC
A NAESTHETIC: IT
TRAVELING D A N D Y ,
IS A PROCLIVITY
T OCONVERT
THE
THE
PLACES
T H R O U G H W H I C H H E TRAVELS INTO A CLUTCH O F EXOTICIZED OBJECTS FOR HIS
O W N
VOYEURISTIC
O W N
CONSUMPTION.
C H A T W I N
IS WELL AWARE,
THOUGH,
O F HIS
EXOTICIST LEANINGS, A N D HIS BLATANTLY AESTHETICIZED PORTRAYAL OF, SAY, CENTRAL AUSTRALIAN N O B L E
S A V A G E
THAN
NOTWITHSTANDING, THAT
ROMANTICISM
PROPENSITY
ABORIGINES
IN
The Songlines
IT IS A N EXERCISE
CHATWIN'S C O M E S
WORK
A CERTAIN
I N WRY
ROMANTIC;
L OCULTIVATED
L OH O M O G E N I Z E D I F F E R E N T P E O P L E S A N D
lK
SELF-PARODY.
IS U N A S H A M E D L Y TENDENCY
THE
IS L E S S A H O M A G E T O 9
THE
P A R O D Y A N D
WITH
NAIVETE:
A
CULTURES; T O DISCOVER
H I N T S u i i |i i •. i lAVKI I I I
PSYCHIC
OR INSTINCTUAL
HISTORICAL
WORLD INTO A R A N D O M HOWEVER, A B O V E
SIMILARITIES RATHER THAN
DIFFERENCES; A N D ,
ARE
DISPLAY
A DANDY'S
ALL E L S E ,
A TWORST,
O F BEAUTIFUL COLLECTOR'S ITEMS.
VIRTUES;
O F A DANDY'S
FOR C H A T W I N ' S
WILL TO
humor: H O W E L S E T O A C C O U N T Doing Here, 1989), I N W H I C H VICIOUS
ACCOUNTING
FOR SOCIAL
T OR E D U C E A N INFINITELY
style.
W O R K
A N D
FOR STORIES LIKE
"
T H E S E
IS THE
SENSE
C H A T W I N A N D HIS C O L L E A G U E S , S W E P T U P IN
W H E R E
THEY Q U A F F C H A M P A G N E
LACK O F OYSTERS); OR DESCRIPTIONS
The Songlines,
LUDE I N
A B I Z A R R E RITE O F T H E
(WHILE LOUDLY LAMENTING
S U C H AS THIS O N E , F R O M A N A F R I C A N
W H E R E TWO
"TOUGH" O N E HAD A PINK
HAD
B O R O R O YOUTHS P A R A D E THEMSELVES I N
CUPID'S
BOW
A R O U N D HIS LIPS; HIS
FINGER
STRAPLESS B O U F F A N T
LAVENDER PANELS OVER A ROSE-COLOURED UNDERSKIRT.
DRESS
T H E EFFECT
WAS . . .
HIS
FRIEND, THE " B E A U T Y , "
WORE
A TIGHT
MAUVE
TURBAN,
A SHEATH O F
G R E E N A N D WHITE STRIPES, A N D H A D A M O R E M O D E R N S E N S E O F F A S H I O N . HAD
B E E N V E R Y CAREFUL WITH THE LIPSTICK, A N D O N EITHER C H E E K H E
P A I N T E D T W O N E A T RECTANGLES I NB A N D S O F P I N K A N D W H I T E . PAIR O F REFLECTING SUNGLASSES, A N D WAS A D M I R I N G
C E R E M O N Y B E I N G DESCRIBED
PLAINED;
C H A T W I N
POTENTIAL
THE
H E HAD
H E HAD ON A
HIMSELF IN A
HAND-MIR
(264)
ROR.
IS M U C H
A SC A M P
E N D ,
M O R E
S E E M S
U N E A S Y
EXPLOITS
N E W B Y
A N D
TLEMAN
HAS
INTERESTED
LIKE
THIS
PUNCTURING
U N E X
ITS
N E W B Y ' S ,
O FM A L E
N E W B Y , BRAVADO,
G E N D E R ROLES.
- THE PRODUCTS O F AN EPICUREAN
WITH
THE
O U T L I V E D ITS U S E F U L N E S S A N D ,
A N D
O ' H A N L O N
THEY ARE UNSUITED,
ALSO LIKE T H E M ,
BLOWN
DANDY'S
ART.
BUT O N L Y C H A T W I N TIME, TIONS
THAT
THE
ASSIMILATES
N E W B Y
FULLY
A N D
accepts
C O N T E M P O R A R Y
THAT THE
A S ITINERANT
O ' H A N L O N ,
AESTHETE, JACKDAW
I
I I I'
G E N
HEROIC WHILE W H I C H
G E N T L E M A N L Y THEATRICS TO A FULL TOO, ARE DANDIES
O F A
H I M S E L F AS O N E ; A N D REALIZES, AT T H E TRAVEL
L I K E
O F THE
PERSIST, N O N E T H E L E S S , I NP L A Y I N G A ROLE FOR
C H A T W I N
M O R E
GENTLEMAN-ADVENTURER.
C H A T W I N RECOGNIZES THAT THE M Y T H
H I S
ART-LOVER,
C O D E O F C O N D U C T F O R W H I C H H E S T A N D S I SH O P E L E S S L Y O U T O F D A T E . Y E T N E W B Y
C O M I C ACT A S
F A S H I O N — O F F E R A WHIMSICAL RIPOSTE TO THE
ASSOCIATED
O ' H A N L O N ,
I N EXPLOITING
DANDIES,
TO REVERSE C O N V E N T I O N A L
WITTY STORIES A N D O B S E R V A T I O N S EXPERT O N F O O D A N D
I NFACT E X I S T S — G O E S
ADVENTURER PERSONA. B U T WHEREAS WITH
IS ONLY TOO H A P P Y
MUSCULAR
H E R E — W H I C H
SPECTACLE. C H A T W I N ' S
FOILS TO HIS ( M A S C U L I N E )
C H A T W I N
AN
THE
INTER
RUINED B Y A PAIR O F FLUORESCENT LIME-GREEN SOCKS A N D G Y M - S H O E S .
COMIC
A
PASSAGE?
NAILS W E R E SCARLET A N D HIS E Y E L I D S G R E E N . H I S
T H E
O F
What Am I
(IN
C I V I L W A R I NA H E A V I L Y F I C T I O N A L I Z E D B E N I N , T A K E R E F U G E I NA L U X U R Y
RESTAURANT,
IN
VICES,
PRODUCT,
O F A DANDY'S
A C O U P "
OR
C O M P L E X
WRITER'S SNJT.R.
I MI'UILL
(MELO)DRAMATIC
KIND, S A M E ASPIRA
PSCUDO-UXPLORER/REPORTER/
'.'I
B I O G R A P H E R — A R E O F FIGURES, THE
IDEALLY S E R V E D B YTHAT M O S T
LORED
THEATRICAL
DANDY.
IF CHATWIN'S DANDY,
SELF-CONSCIOUSLY
SYBARITIC TASTES
PETER MAYLE'S, T O THAT
A R EBEST
SUITED
T O T H EP E R S O N A
O F THE
I NH I S H U G E L Y SUCCESSFUL P R O V E N C E B O O K S ,
ARE
(1989)
A N D ITS
ENCES
O F M O V I N G
F R O M
L O N D O N
T OA QUIET
CORNER
O FT H E L U B E R O N I N
SOUTHERN F R A N C E , W H E R E H EA N D HISWIFE, H A V I N G B O U G H T A COTTAGE, ADAPT
T OT H E R H Y T H M S
FIRST—ARE
TAI
10
country gentleman O R squire. A Year in Provence S E Q U E L , Toujours Provence (1991), S K E T C H M A Y L E ' S E X P E R I
O FTHE
O F "RURAL
CLASSIC E X A M P L E S
LESS O N M O V E M E N T
O FPASTORAL
TRAVEL NARRATIVE.
THAN O NA NOSTALGIC APPRECIATION
LIFE THAT, T H O U G H I M P E R I L E D ,
SLOWLY
LIFE." T H ET W O BOOKS—ESPECIALLY T H E
REMAINS
RECALCITRANT
T H E I R
ACCENT IS
F O R A R E G I O N A L W A YO F
T OCHANGE. T H I S W A YO F
LIFE, A F F E C T I O N A T E L Y R E N D E R E D B YM A Y L E W I T H T H E R O S E - T I N T E D GLASSES O F T H E " P E R M A N E N T
VISITOR," REVOLVES A R O U N D
TICULARLY, C O N S U M I N G TUNATE (MOSTLY
T H ERITUALS
O FGROWING
F O O D . T H EL U B E R O N , F O R M A Y L E
ENGLISH)
VISITORS, ISA G O U R M E T ' S
AND,
PAR
A N DA STRING O F F O R
PARADISE:
A PLACE
WHERE
F O O D , I NPLENTIFUL SUPPLY,
ISRIGHTLY TREASURED—ESPECIALLY B Y THOSE W H O
A R E R E L I E V E D O FT H E B U R D E N
O F PRODUCING
PLACES
U N A S H A M E D
THORSTEIN
V E B L E N
EMPHASIS FAMOUSLY
IT. M A Y L E , A P R O F E S S I O N A L
O N LEISURE:
O N WHAT
CALLED "CONSPICUOUS
LIFE O FL E I S U R E M I G H T B EH A R D W O R K
WRITER,
T H E SOCIOLOGIST
CONSUMPTION."
(AT LEAST FOR THE EPICUREAN'S
1
1
T H I S
DIGESTIVE
TRACTS) B U TIT R E Q U I R E S LITTLE H A R D L A B O R , S I N C E T H E LATTER I S T A K E N C A R E O F B Y A WILLING M A Y L E
LOCAL WORKFORCE.
WATCHING
M U C H
Y A R D A N DI NT H E S U R R O U N D I N G The
fields
OF
A Year in Provence
OTHER P E O P L E WORKING, FARMERS'
MOSTLY FIELDS.
IS T A K E N U P W I T H
O NH I S H O U S E
H E R E I SA TYPICAL
a r o u n d t h ehouse were inhabited every d a y b y
i n g s l o w l y a n dm e t h o d i c a l l y
A N D VINE PASSAGE:
figures
m o v
across t h elandscape, weeding the vine
y a r d s , treating t h ec h e r r y trees, h o e i n g t h es a n d y e a r t h . N o t h i n g w a s hurried. W o r k s t o p p e d a t n o o n f o r l u n c h in t h e s h a d e o f a tree, a n d the only sounds f o r t w ohours were snatches o fdistant
conversation
t h a t c a r r i e d h u n d r e d s o f y a r d s o n t h e s t i l l a i r . (43) A S
I N T H EBEST
W I L L I A M P O O R " :
TRADITION
E M P S O N
CALLS
A RELATIONSHIP
CONFLICT,
CHARACTERIZED
B Y T H E H A P P Y
LANDOWNING
O F PASTORAL,
A "BEAUTIFUL
COEXISTENCE
BOURGEOISIE.
RECOURSE T OOLD-FASHIONED PRIDES
T H I S
NARRATIVE
BETWEEN
B YT H E A P P A R E N T O FT H E LOCAL
NEOFEUDAL
E N G L I S H — " G O O D
HIMSELF O N HISHONESTY TOWARD
S H O R T SHRIFT
M A Y L E ' S
RELATION
FICTION
U P WHAT
ABSENCE
PEASANTRY
O F CLASS WITH T H E
IS M A I N T A I N E D
MANNERS":
M A Y L E
HIS FAITHFUL WORKERS,
T OT H O S E W H O T A K E T H E I R S E R V I C E S I N V A I N .
I"
SETS
T H ERICH A N D T H E
nmihiku w i Til l VIM WHITIIUS
B Y
CLEARLY
A N DH E GIVES
M A Y L E ,
LIKE
N E W B Y ,
TAKES
REFUGE
I N ANOTHER
ASSET," SELF-DEPRECATION: THE P R O V E N C E B O O K S
M A K E
ENGLISH
"NATIONAL
A VIRTUE O F HIS
TIVE I N C O M P E T E N C E AS A C O U N T R Y G E N T L E M A N , HIS SLOW A D A P T A T I O N EIGN
CULTURE,
Provence NATIVE,"
A N D
E V E N
THE
FINDS
ECCENTRICITIES
H I M
RECOGNIZING
M O C K I N G
THAT
THE
O F
HIS
HIS
CASUAL
ENGLISH
O W N
Toujours
PEERS.
GESTURES
TOWARD
LIFESTYLE H E A N D
" G O I N G
H I SW I F E
H A V E
A D O P T E D I NF R A N C E O W E S LESS TO T H E C A R E F R E E ATTITUDES H E T E N D S TO TO
THE LOCAL P R O V E N C E A U X THAN
T OT H E P R I V I L E G E S
THAT
RELA
TO A FOR
ACCRUE
ASCRIBE
T OA
FOR
E I G N E R ' S C H O I C E O F C O M F O R T A B L E E X P A T R I A T I O N . C O M F O R T , I N D E E D , I SA THAT RESONATES T H R O U G H O U T
M A Y L E ' S
TWO
P R O V E N C E NARRATIVES.
ARE RARE, A N D W H E N
THESE D O A P P E A R , THEY ARE USUALLY CAUSED B Y
M A Y L E ' S
ACQUIRE M O M E N T U M
NARRATIVES
HOSPITALITIES,
THE UNHURRIED
F R O M
GIVE-AND-TAKE
THE MUTUAL
O F HOSPITALITY,
VISITORS,
M A Y L E ' S
ARE
G U A R A N T E E D
T ORAISE
A N D
ARE TRAVELOGUES THAT W O R K
erase
TO
A N D
B YREVERSING THE CONVENTIONAL
M A Y L E ' S W O R K
THEIR "TRAVEL"
STATUS,
THE PROPERTIES O F
H O M E
B E T W E E N
H E ISRELUCTANT, LIKE M O S T
TO O R DISCUSS T H E R E A S O N S FOR HIS O W N TO REVEAL T H E COST O F A M E A L — W H I C H
STRESSING THE
AFFORDABIL-
TRAVEL WRITERS,
TO CONFESS
A F F L U E N C E , H E ISM O R E T H A N IS, M O S T
OFTEN, " V E R Y
WILLING
REASONABLE."
THIS, I NTURN, ISO N E O F THE REASONS FOR THE STAGGERING POPULARITY BOOKS:
FOR I NS H O W I N G
AVERAGE WEALTH S O M E
C I T I Z E N — O R , TO E N J O Y
W A Y
D E M O C R A C Y M A Y L E ' S
SUCH
AGE-RANGE
O F HIS
B U O U X , P E A C H
COMFORT,
TARGET
M Y T H S
O NA H O R S E M A Y L E
IT D O E S
BOURGEOIS
SUCCESS
A N D
C H A M P A G N E .
I N
Toujours
READERSHIP.
EXISTENCE.)
( T H E
ALSO
SIT
U N D E R
AFTER
OUTSIDE
THE OAKS
IDEAL P H E
INDICATES WORLD,
B E I N G
C O N
THE VILLAGE
SIPPING
A
TASTE.
Provence,
FOR CITY DWELLERS T H R O U G H O U T THE
T OA P I C N I C SITE
GOES
INTO
A SWELL A SI N D I C A T I N G T H E
VILLAGE
HIS
FABULOUS
O FR E F I N E M E N T
O F THE P R O V E N C E B O O K S
CARRIAGE
C O M P A N Y
TAKE
VALUES, BOURGEOIS
MIDDLE-CLASS)
O F " Q U A I N T " A N D
N O T
O F F R A N C E — M A Y L E
CELEBRATED I N STYLE
(BRITISH
O F
ARE WITHIN THE RANGE O F THE
A N ARISTOCRACY
ELSE: THE DURABILITY,
ROMANTIC
THAT
AFFORDABLE H E D O N I S M ,
INTERNATIONAL
S O M E T H I N G O F
CONVERTING
BIRTHDAY,
EPITOMIZES
V E Y E D
B Y EXTENSION,
O F BOURGEOIS FIFTIETH
N O M E N A L
THAT G O U R M E T M E A L S
A LIFE O F LEISURE I N T H E S O U T H
TOWARD
THE
HOST.
FIGHTS FREE O F AFFECTATION B Y
ITY O F L U X U R Y . W H I L E
I NTHIS S E N S E ,
TRAVELER'S DISTINCTION
T E M P O R A R Y GUEST A N D THE P E R M A N E N T
FOREIGN
T OBRING H I M
" C L O S E R " TO T H E LOCALS W H O S E TRUST H E W O R K S SO H A R D TO W I N . M A Y L E ' S B O O K S
O F
SENTIMEN
INVARIABLY B Y
HACKLES,
B O T H B Y ESTABLISHING A FOREIGN BASE THAT ASSUMES
GUESTS.
E X C H A N G E
THAT H E ASSOCIATES
TALLY W I T H T H E C O U N T R Y LIFE. A B U S E S
W O R D
T E N S I O N S
HIS
O F
FAVORITE
T h e r e is n o t h i n g l i k e a c o m f o r t a b l e a d v e n t u r e t o p u tp e o p l e i n a g o o d h u m o r , a n dM a u r i c e [ t h eh o s t ] c o u l d h a r d l y h a v e h o p e d f o r a m o r e a p p r e c i a t i v e a u d i e n c e . H e d e s e r v e d it. H e h a d t h o u g h t o f e v e r y t h i n g , from
a n a b u n d a n c e o f ice t o t o o t h p i c k s ,
a n d , as h e h a d said,
there
w a s n o d a n g e r o f u s g o i n g h u n g r y . H ec a l l e d u s t o sit d o w n a n d g a v e us a g u i d e d t o u r of the
dade
first
course: m e l o n , quails' eggs, c r e a m y
o f cod, g a m e pate, stuffed
tomatoes, marinated
bran-
m u s h r o o m s —
o n a n d o n it w e n t , s t r e t c h i n g f r o m o n ee n d o f t h e t a b l e t o t h e o t h e r , looking,
under the
filtered
sunlight,
like a n implausibly
perfect
still
life f r o m t h e p a g e s o f o n e o f t h o s e a r t c o o k b o o k s t h a t n e v e r sees t h e kitchen.
(43)
Tonjours Provence
A N D ITS P R E C U R S O R S I M I L A R L Y G I V E
US
MOUTHWATERING
G U I D E D T O U R S O FT H E I R W R I T E R ' S F A V O R I T E M E A L S ; W E ,L I K E H I M , G E T T O S A M P L E THE
M E N U ,
B E IT AT A N E I G H B O R H O O D
WINE-CELLAR, TENDS
O RA C O U N T R Y
PARADOXICALLY
TOWARD
routier
CAFE, A
RESTAURANT.
1 2
TRAVEL
T H E IMMOBILITY
CANTEEN, A
NARRATIVE,
PRIVATE
F O R M A Y L E ,
O F STILL-LIFE
PAINTING; O R
RATHER T O W A R D THE FESTIVE REPRESENTATIONS O F THE FRIEZE O R
tableau vivant:
T H E RURAL E V E N T , T H E FEAST, T H E FAIR, T H E J O Y O U S SPECTACLE O F
CONSUMPTION.
T H E S E A N D
A R CN O T , H O W E V E R , T H EVICARIOUS
FAMOUS;
F O RM A Y L E ' S
BOOKS
PLEASURES O FOBSERVING
ASSUME,
TOURISM IS N O LONGER PROHIBITIVE,
T H E RICH
I N A NA G EW H E R E
THAT T H ED R E A M S
"QUALITY"
H E A N D HIS WIFE
O U T — T H E F A N T A S I E S O FT H E C O U N T R Y G E N T L E M A N — A R E A V A I L A B L E
A V E R A G E M E A N S , A S W E L L A S T O T H E W E A L T H Y : T O ALL T H O S E I N FACT W H O , ING T O LIVE, K N O W F O R
M A Y L E ,
O ' H A N L O N ,
A SI N THEIR
VARIOUS
WAYS
F O RTHEIR C O N T E M P O R A R Y ,
WRITING
SPRINGS
TRANSIT, I NN A I P A U L ' S
F R O M
IT—IS
V . S . NAIPAUL,
SOMETHING
N E W B Y ,
QUITE
T R A V E L — A N D T H E
DIFFERENT. T
OB E I N
TRAVEL WRITINGS I N V O K E
A SENSE O F ORIGI-
A P E R C E P T I O N THAT ALL P L A C E S A R ET H EW R O N G
T H A T A L LT I M E S A R ET H E W R O N G
TIME;
FOR AS I NN E W B Y ' S
PLACE.'
ALMOST
CALLY B E L A T E D
I N
FIGURE.
A N DINDIAN BOOKS
IMPERIALIST
NOSTALGIA—NOT
I M M U N E . ) " I NAIPAUL'S N E W B Y ' S .
O FTHE MOST
SEARING INVECTIVE
ISDIRECTED, PRECISELY, AGAINST THAT
ANACHRONISM,
N A I P A U L
I N SPITE O F HIMSELF (RAISED
HIMSELF
C O M I
NAIPAUL'S
T H EFUTILITY O F IS
NECESSARILY
H O W E V E R , ISO FA DIFFERENT K I N D T O
I T REFLECTS T H EFEAR O FA B A N D O N M E N T ,
a COLONIAL NAIPAUL
( S O M E
3
A N D O ' H A N
LON'S TRAVEL NARRATIVES, T H E TRAVELER CUTS A C O N S P I C U O U S L Y ,
AFRICAN
A N D
A SOURCE O FPLEASURE A N D
W O R K , IS T O B E I N A C O N T I N U A L STATE O F CRISIS. A S D E N
NIS P O R T E R H A S N O T E D , N A I P A U L ' S NARY DISPLACEMENT:
F O RCHATWIN,
REMAINS
ENRICHMENT.
A N D
WORK
H O WT O PROFIT F R O M THEIR E N J O Y M E N T .
T R A V E L , D E S P I T E ITS TRIALS,
THAT
LIVE
TO THOSE O F
N O TT H EW I S H F O R
I NTRINIDAD,
O F INDIAN
REVIVAL;
AUCESLRY),
STANDS P O I S E D B E T W E E N a PAST H E C A N N O T ACCEPT A N Da LIILUIC H E
IOUIUSTX
w i 111
1 Y I ' l l W K i t IIIIIM
C A N N O T BRING HIMSELF TO C O U N T E N A N C E — A FUTURE THAT HOLDS N O PLACE FOR HIM.
SARA SULERI EXPRESSES THE D I L E M M A
E X P R E S S I O N T OA D Y I N G
WELL: "[NAIPAUL'S]
GENERATION. . . .
N A I P A U L RECORDS A PERSPECTIVE THAT K N O W S HAS H A D
(English India 150).
T H E R A G E A N D , A B O V E ALL, T H E S E L F - C O N T E M P T O F N A I P A U L ' S TO CONTAIN
T H E VICIOUSNESS
O F NAIPAUL'S
A N D
"CULTURAL
KNOWS
ORIGINS"
THE CONDITION
THEIR O W N
INCURABLY
ISTHE VICIOUSNESS
O F A M A N ,
ALL T O O W E L L . S O M U C H
ULARLY INDIA'S, W H I C H OFTEN REVILES H I M H EBELONGS.
(NAIPAUL'S
INDIAN
F R O M
COMES
OUTSIDER
T OINSIDER,
F R O M THE WRITER'S
THE ALTERNATING STRAINS
CLEAR,
FINALLY,
F R O M
BRITAIN—MORE
A N D
M E M O R Y
O F PATRICIAN
HE EXPRESSES FOR TRINIDAD, THE
A N D
ISCLEAR F R O M N A I P A U L ' S W O R L D "
IRRESISTIBLY
ITS S U D D E N S H I F T S I N S U B J E C T
FOR THE INTENSITY
THAT
O F LOSS.) I TI SC L E A R E N O U G H , T O O ,
F R O M
DISDAIN A N D LINGERING AFFECTION
AMBIVALENCE
H EDEMONSTRATES
E N G L A N D — W H E R E H E HAS
TRAVEL WRITINGS
STRADDLE
CODES
A N D
PASTORAL, ATAVISTIC
TOWARD
RESIDED
O F ERIC M O D E S
N E W B Y ,
DISPLACED.
THE GAP
MOST
THAN
EVER,
BETWEEN
A N UNWANTED
E P I S O D E S I NN A I P A U L ' S
S OI N D E B T E D
O F IMPERIALIST
REPRESENTATION
(EUROCENTRIC
VIEWS O N " P R I M I T I V E " CULTURES, A N D SO ON). A T TIMES,
THE RIGOROUS ASCETICISM
S E E M
T OASPIRE,
DESPISES: TAKING
IF H E W E R E
O F B R A H M I N I C A L CULTURE TO THE
P E R V E R S E L Y , T O B EO N E O F T H E " M I M I C
O N THE TRAPPINGS
O F ANOTHER IMPERIAL
CULTURE,
ING OTHERS' VALUES A N D ATTITUDES, C O N S E N T I N G TO HIS O W N Y E T THIS V I E W ISM U C H DIVIDED
CULTURAL
ORIGINARY
WORK
ARE THEY T O "GENTLE
CONSCIOUSNESS A N D REFINEMENT O F THE G E N T L E M E N TRAVELERS' CLUB. MIGHT
GREAT
FOR
1 5
THE P E R S O N A H E PROJECTS ISWILLFULLY DISTANT A N D ELITIST—AS ING TO W E D
THAT
POSTCOLONIAL P R E S E N T THAT IS N E I
THER FULLY ACCEPTED N O R U N D E R S T O O D . S O M E
M A N L Y "
POSI
O F THE PAIN
COLONIAL INHERITANCE A N D AN A M B I G U O U S
WORTHY
NOTO
An Area of Darkness (1977), A N D India: A Million
O F HIS LIFE A SA FULLY ENTITLED BRITISH SUBJECT B U T W H E R E , M O R E
ALMOST
W H O
CULTURES—PARTIC
B U T TO W H I C H H E FEELS
H E F E E L S ILL A T E A S E , S O C I A L L Y M A R G I N A L I Z E D ,
SEEM
" H O M E "
A WRITER,
W H E R E H E S P E N T HIS F O R M A T I V E YEARS. A N D IT IS
PARTICULARLY,
NAIPAUL'S
IMPULSES.
"TRILOGY,"
(1964), India: A Wounded Civilization Mutinies Now (1990). I S R E M A R K A B L E F O R TION
H E N C E
WRITINGS, AS THEY
MELANCHOLIC
ATTACKS O N ROMANTIC NOSTALGIA FOR
RIOUSLY SPLENETIC P R O N O U N C E M E N T S O N " T H I R D
THAT
CHANGE,
ITS T I M E I S D O N E E V E N B E F O R E I T
T H E C H A N C E TO B E FULLY ARTICULATED"
S T R U G G L E I NV A I N
WRITINGS LEND
I N A N A R E N A O F FRANTIC
IDENTITY; A N D
TIQUE O F IMPERIALIST T H R O U G H O U T HIS W O R K .
HIS
UNDERCUTTING
O F all
N A I P A U L M E N " H E EMULAT
SUBORDINATION.
T O O S I M P L E : F O R O N E , ITFAILS TO R E C O G N I Z E
ALLEGIANCES A N D
LIKE
A CRITIQUE
N E W B Y
THAT
NAIPAUL'S
-I !
CRI
ISP U R S U E D , I F INDIRECTLY,
A N D <>'LL A N L O N . N A I P A U L
AI-TIIH I ' M i M i n
1 6
EXPRESSIONS O F
F O R A N O T H E R , IT A L L O W S N O P L A C E F O R N A I P A U L ' S
THINKING
TRY
CLASS-
ASPIRES JEAL-
OUSLY TO THE PART O F THE " E N G L I S H
GENTLEMAN
TRAVELER" WHILE
ALSO
DIS
TANCING HIMSELF F R O M THAT V E R Y ROLE. B U T WHEREAS SELF-IRONY, FOR THE FOR M E R
TWO
WRITERS,
ISA STRATEGY O F SELF-PROTECTION, A N
T H E M TO REINSTATE O U T M O D E D IMPERIAL MYTHS, T U R N E D O N HIS
O W N
COLONIAL
THE INSTITUTIONS (IN HIM,
UPBRINGING.
PARTICULAR,
N O T AS A M E M B E R
A N D
THE EDUCATION
O F THE NATION'S
NAIPAUL'S
The
AMBIVALENCE
IS P E R H A P S
BEST
TOWARD
WRITER'S
(NAIPAUL'S)
ISA I M E D
THAT H A V E
G E N T L E M A N
AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL
STRICTLY S P E A K I N G ,
NOVEL
The Enigma of
Arrival
AT ALL, B U T R A T H E R A F I C T I O N A L I Z E D M E M O I R
SOJOURN
I N WESTERN
C H A T W I N ' S W O R K , TRAVEL REMAINS
E N G L A N D .
THE D O M I N A N T
O F THE
H O W E V E R ,
A SI N
M E T A P H O R — M O R E
PARTIC
U L A R L Y I N THIS C A S E , AS T H E TITLE I M P L I E S , T H E M E T A P H O R O F " A R R I V A L . " CENTER
O F THE
PAINTING,
TEXT
IS NAIPAUL'S
READING
O F D E
CHIRICO'S
W H I C H H E CONSTRUES AS A N IRONIC M E D I T A T I O N LIFE AS A CYCLICAL
PATTERN O F INEVITABLY
(97-104).
T H E
SISYPHEAN
TASK O F E N D U R I N G FRUSTRATION. SHUTTLING B E T W E E N AN
ILLUSTRATES
NAIPAUL'S
UNFINISHED
IDEA
O F
A N D
ARRIVAL.
A NI N T E R M E D I A R Y
TRAVEL WRITING—PERHAPS
SPACE
QUESTS
TRAVEL
NAIPAUL'S
B E T W E E N
RETURN
ALL W R I T I N G — I S A C H A R T I N G
O F
S P A C E : IT D E L I N E A T E S T H E U N F I N I S H E D C H R O N I C L E O F A S E L F I N C O N S T A N T NAIPAUL'S SHIRE,
COTTAGE, O N THE OUTSKIRTS
IS MERELY
O F A MANORIAL
T H E LATEST T E M P O R A R Y
FOR THE
TRAVELER-WRITER. T H E N O V E L DESCRIBES ARCING M O V E M E N T S
A R O U N D ITS S U B J E C T , F O L L O W I N G T H E R H Y T H M S SPIRAL D O W N W A R D F O R M
TO D E C A Y . N A I P A U L ' S
O F"POSTCOLONIAL
PASTORAL"
FRONTING, I NA U T O B I O G R A P H I C A L
HIS
F R O M
O W N
N I X O N
SAYS, A
HAVING
GOLDSMITH,
G R A Y ' S
Elegy,
N O T A P A S T O R A L , A S IT IS F O R M A Y L E , O F S M U G A PASTORAL O F REGRET: A MEDITATIVE ERARIES TAKE H I M OF AN FOR AN
ANCIENT
PAST,
A N D H A R D Y "
B Y
"HISTORY"
M A N ' S R A M B L E S , ALL T W E E D S A N D W A L K I N G
.| 1
1oUHisis
O F
(161-62).
CULTURAL NOSTALGIA, BUT
wiiii
ITS D E S C E N D A N T S , HAS
B E E N DENIED.'
BUT 7
STICKS A N D E L E G A N T
ivri
u . H I 11 11
C O N
T H I S
IS
RATHER
SITE F O R D R E A M S O F L O S S . N A I P A U L ' S
UNAPPRECIATED
TO W H O M
CON
PRESENCE I NE N G L A N D . . .
R E P E A T E D L Y TO A SERIES O F RUINS A N D R E M N A N T S :
"OUTSIDER"
THEY
CURIOUS
"DEFERRED
[HE] ULTIMATELY FACES A G A R D E N C O U N T Y SUFFUSED B Y A N A M B I E N C E STABLE, R U S K I N ,
THIS
LABORIOUSLY
O F THE SEASONAL CYCLE AS
IS, A S R O B
WHEREBY,
TERMS,
WILT
EXHAUSTED
A W A Y
HIMSELF,
THAT
TRANSIT.
ESTATE I NRURAL
RESTING-PLACE
A L R E A D Y P E R I P H E R A L " C E N T E R " ; IT M O V E S , L I K E N A I P A U L
A S A
IRRETRIEV
ABLE POINT O F ORIGIN A N D AN UNASSAILABLE POINT O F DESTINATION, TRAVELER OCCUPIES
THE
O N THE DEFERRAL O F
O N
PAINTING
A T
E P O N Y M O U S
"ARRIVAL":
WORLD-WEARY
M A R
SUBJECTS.
THE FIGURE O F THE ENGLISH I N HIS
AT
S H A P E D
R U L I N G E L I T E , B U T A S O N E O F ITS
DEMONSTRATED
Enigma of Arrival (1987).
IS N O T A T R A V E L N A R R A T I V E
PERMITS
IT IS A W E A P O N
THAT W E A P O N SYSTEM)
GINALIZED COLONIAL A N D , M O R E RECENTLY, I M M I G R A N T
TRAVELER
ALIBI THAT
FOR N A I P A U L
ITIN
REMINDERS FASCINATING
T H E S E
GENTLE
SCLFINOCKERY.
REENACT A NARRATIVE B Y
O F DECLINE E P I T O M I Z E D
ITS L A N D L O R D , A F A D E D A R I S T O C R A T ,
VIVES
The
O N
A DWINDLING LEGACY A N D
Enigma of Arrival,
IZES THE WORK
B Y THE CRUMBLING
N O W
WELL INTO
VAPID
FANTASIES
ESTATE;
IN THIS SENSE, B O T H ALLEGORIZES A N D
M E S M E R I Z E D
B YANOTHER'S
PAST.
WORN-OUT
G E N T L E M A N -
NAIPAUL'S
ROLE
C O U N T R Y G E N T L E M A N IS C O N D U C T E D F R O M T H E W I N G S ; IT IS S I G N I F I C A N T COTTAGE
IS O N
GINAL," A N D
W H O
FADED
OBVIOUS
MYSTIFIES COLONIAL
IT ISN A I P A U L ,
A M O N G
BUT THE
GENTLEMANLINESS
A N D I NRESUSCITATING
N A I P A U L
HAS
FORWARD M O V E M E N T
NAIPAUL'S
THAT
P R O D U C E D
A N D
EMPTINESS
G E N T L E M A N , " A N
ITSELF I S A
IS O N E
POSE
IT, I R O N I C A L L Y ,
A NANTITRAVEL
DEBILITATES
HIS
" M A R
N O TRUE G E N T L E M A N PRESENTS H I M S E L F — H E OTHERS.
DECLINING POWER;
REGRESSIVE
IS A " M I M I C
A S A
THE
GRADUALLY TAKES OVER THE "CENTER," REVEALING THE
CONTEXT,
DISABLES
O F THE ESTATE. B U T
G R A N D E U R A T ITS C O R E . N A I P A U L
IMPOSTOR;
IMPOSTOR
SUSTAIN
THE MARGINS
PAST.
M O N U M E N T A L
O F E M P I R E , R E D U C I N G ITS L A T T E R - D A Y P R O D U C T S T O A
TENANT,
SUR
O F A "GLORIOUS"
LANDLORD, PITIFULLY O U T O F T O U C H W I T H T H E PRESENT, A N D TO HIS M A N Q U E
A N D
HIS D O T A G E , W H O
THAT
I NA POST-
TEXT
THAT
BOTH
THE NOSTALGIC ENERGIES
THAT
MYTHS.
W O R K
REMINDS
US THAT
GENTLEMANLINESS, I NA
LATE-TWENTI
ETH-CENTURY CONTEXT, HAS B E C O M E A M Y T H I C A L ACT O F O F F I C E — A N ACT I N THE L I T E R A L S E N S E T H A T IT P E R F O R M S A D R A M A T I C R O L E . N A I P A U L ' S G E N T L E M A N M A N C E ,
The Enigma of Arrival
I N
ASSIMILATING
N E W B Y ' S
A N D
LACRAL C O P I E S
IT T OA BROADER
O ' H A N L O N ' S
MAYLC'S
D R A M A
ROLE AS A M I M I C
ACCENTUATES O F
THIS
IMPERIAL
PERFOR
IMPOSTURE.
GENTLEMAN-ADVENTURERS ARE, LIKEWISE,
FOR A MYTHICAL
THEIRS, I ND O U B T .
M E R E L Y
FIGURE W H O S E
AUTHENTICITY
SIMU-
IS PLACED,
COUNTRY G E N T L E M A N ISA BOURGEOIS
LIKE
EXPATRIATE
W H O S E O N L Y D U T Y I SE N J O Y M E N T ; A N D C H A T W I N ' S D A N D Y I S A N A E S T H E T E
A N D
A
THE
CONNOISSEUR
D A N D Y
O F THE SOCIAL
GRACES THAT
M A K E
THE G E N T L E M A N , LIKE
H I M S E L F , I N T O A N O T H E R A R T I S T I C O B J E C T . G E N T L E M A N L I N E S S , I F IT
E V E R G E N U I N E , I SN O W
JECT FOR C O N T E M P O R A R Y TRAVEL NARRATIVE, W H I C H NARROWS R E P O R T E D FACTS, E M B R O I D E R E D
TALES, A N D
OUT-AND-OUT
THE G A P
IS W E L L A T T U N E D T O E M P I R E ' S
MYTHS.
I NN A R R A T I V E S
DLE-CLASS M A Y L E ' S
AUDIENCE. WORK
TURAL NOSTALGIA ELSEWHERE,
OWES
THAT, LIKE ERIC N E W B Y ' S ,
T H E M U C H
POPULARITY
T H E ENGLISH
O FN E W B Y ' S
AND,
TO A BOURGEOIS CONCEPTION
SUCCESSFULLY
TRADES. LORMS
A M I
SUCH
NOSLALGIA
O F PASLORAL
LHAL
I' I . M I ' I I M
I ,
A G E GEN
IMPERIAL
P L A Y TO A NOSTALGIC
M I D
PARTICULARLY,
O F (ENGLISH)
A N O S T A L G I A I NW H I C H TRAVEL W R I T I N G , F R O M
RECOURSE TO C O M F O R T I N G
WHICH
I NA N
T L E M A N A B R O A D , H O W E V E R C O N T R I V E D , A P P E A R S N O N E T H E L E S S AS A N R E M N A N T
SUB
B E T W E E N
FABLES, A N D
ACTS AS A U S E F U L V E H I C L E F O R T H E RECYCLING O F I M P E R I A L SIMULACRA THAT, AFTER E M P I R E ,
WERE
A L M O S T CERTAINLY F A K E — A N D , AS SUCH, A FITTING
E N G L A N D
IS REFLECTED
L E - U R E I I L E IH E
IN
CUL A N D T H E
CONDITIONS
FOR
A N IDEALIZED,
MOSTLY
INDOLENT,
REFLECTED I NTHE ATTEMPT, AUTHORITY, A N D
IRONIC
O F
HERE,
ABROAD,
DEMISE
THE
SUGNET'S
LIFE."
B YLINES
NOT
O F
THE
ONLY
F R O M
THE
TRANSPORTS
[THEY]
T OTHE
BACK
O F THE
CONSE
ACERBICALLY:
M A K I N G
" T H E
ITEASIER
FOR
O R [THEIR] R E A D E R S
EVENTS
TRAVEL WRITERS
GEN
HIMSELF
HIMSELF
SUGGESTS
CONVENIENT,
O F RESPONSIBILITY
T H E
O N THE ROLE O F THE
TO DISABUSE
THE SENSE THAT
CASE IS OVERSTATED: MOST
THEY
ARE
REPORT"
(85).
ARE ONLY TOO AWARE
O F
N O R N E E D REPORTAGE B E THE ONLY, OR E V E N
OBJECT O F THEIR EXERCISE: FOR N E W B Y
A N D
O ' H A N L O N ,
FOR
R E P O R T A G E — T H E RECENT PAST RECALLED I NTHE P R E S E N T — T A K E S TO T H E IRONIC
M A K I N G
" G E N T L E M A N
IT SPRINGS
TAKING
S U G N E T
IS PARTICULARLY
SENSIBILITIES.
ROLE
BRITISH
TO THE
F R E E — T O A C T A S I F IT N E V E R H A D .
ALSO ATTEMPTS
SUPPRESS
I T IS ALSO
HAS COLLAPSED, BUT THAT THE TRAVELER IS
TO B E
TRAVELER-WRITER
BUT
WRITERS] TO
THEIR ESCAPIST
T H E
IS ENABLING:
O F THE PRESENT. A SCHARLES
CONNECTED
M A R Y ,
E M P I R E .
RIDICULOUS,
pretend
O F THE E M P I R E
[TRAVEL
"COUNTRY
OR REGIONS FORMERLY U N D E R
HAS FURTHER USES: FOR B Y
ANOTHER TIME,
QUENCES
BRITISH
THAT THE E M P I R E
BETTER, CAN
DECLINE O F E M P I R E
INTO
THE
H O W E V E R
AWARENESS
F R E E — O R ,
TLEMAN
I NCOUNTRIES
O F
TO REHEARSE THE GESTURES THAT O N C E CONTRIBUTED
SUSTAINING
A B R O A D "
W A Y
BUT NEVERTHELESS CONCERTED ATTEMPT
E X A M P L E ,
SECOND
TO REINSTALL A
CIZED VERSION O F NINETEENTH-CENTURY IMPERIAL HISTORY.
PRI
PLACE
ROMANTI
SUGNET IS PERHAPS
T O O K E E N T O D I S C U S S T H E S E R I O U S N E S S O F A G E N R E T H A T O F T E N D O E S ITS B E S T P E R S U A D E ITS R E A D E R S N O T T O T A K E I T S E R I O U S L Y . US,
M A Y
ALSO B E
T H E G E N R E ' S LAST LINE O F D E F E N S E . A N D
ENGLISH
G E N T L E M A N ; FOR THE G E N T L E M A N
SUBJECT
FOR C A M P
STILL V E R Y M U C H
B U T THIS, AS S U G N E T
PERFORMANCE,
WITH US. A N D
BUT
THAT
TODAY
M A Y
ALSO THAT
BUT,
" T H O U G H M A Y
H E ALSO REPRESENTS A LEGACY THAT IS
LEGACY M A Y
(85).
THE POINT.
ACCIDENTALLY
M R
DISCLAIM SUCH
A N
INCIDENT
N E W B Y
ALSO
COMPLICITY,
CONTRIBUTE
INADVERTENTLY
DISPLAY.
PROFESS
SUGNET
RUNNING
D O W N
SAYS
H E STILL A R R O G A T E S T O
A N D
F R O M N E W B Y ' S
A N D
INITIALLY CHARGED
W H A T M A D E TO S A Y , "
O FTHEMSELVES,
O F REPRESENTATION, J U D G E M E N T ,
O F E M P I R E "
T E H R A N .
THE
CARLESS A N D
WITH MURDER,
WITH
A LOCAL P E A S A N T THEY
A N D
HIMSELF
M O B I L I T Y THAT W E R E EFFECTS
A Short Walk
ARE I N TROUBLE
KILLING
S E E M S TO THE LAW
O N
SUP AFTER
THE ROAD
ARE EVENTUALLY
CARLESS WAS
FRIEND A N D
GENTLEMANLY
I N THIS [AFFAIR],
T L E M A N L Y . . . THAT H E H A S D E C I D E D
.|(>
INTERPRETER N I K I , BECAUSE
"THAT Y O U
M E
IT IS B E C A U S E W E R E ALL
N O T T O P R O C E E D W I T H I T " (86),
T U U H l : . ' '• W i l l i I Y l ' U W H I II 11
TO
ACQUITTED.
T H E P R O S E C U T O R C H A N G E HIS M I N D ? " T H E P R O S E C U T O R ASKS CARLESS'S
TO
AGAIN:
T H E TRAVELER N O L O N G E R R E P R E S E N T S A LITERAL I M P E R I A L P O W E R
SPECIFICALLY
T H E RIGHTS
PORT
I N SPITE
O F
B E A FIGURE O F FUN, A
TO THE FURTHERING O F THE CULTURAL P R E J U D I C E THAT TRAVEL WRITERS CRITIQUE
TO
REMINDS
S O
GEN
N E W B Y
A N D C A R L E S S A R E S A V E D , AFTER ALL, B Y T H E M Y T H O F G E N T L E M A N L I N E S S . WE, THEIR READERS, ALLOW T H E M ,
I NTURN, TO GET A W A Y W I T H
C O U N T E R T R A V E L AND
I N HER STUDY
REST
O F
THE
Imperial Eyes (1992), H A V E
WORLD'
M A N Y
M A R Y
E U R O P E A N
CRIT
N O R M S .
TO P R O D U C E
HAS B E E N
of Empire,
IDENTIFIES TRAVEL WRITING AS O N E O F THOSE "DISCOURSES
HIS
(4);
A N O T H E R "
STUDY
B Y
ALI
B E H D A D
I N
SUPPORTED
1993),
W H O
O F COLONIALISM" B Y
W H I C H " O N E CULTURE C O M E S TO INTERPRET, TO REPRESENT, A N D FINALLY TO INATE
THAT " 'THE
A T DIFFERENT POINTS
PRATT'S W O R K
(The Rhetoric
SPURR
DISCERNING
L O U I S E PRATT DEMONSTRATES OR INDIRECTLY,
READERSHIPS
T R A J E C T O R Y " (5).
RECENTLY B Y D A V I D
O F ITS M O R E
THAT REINFORCES E U R O P E A N
H E L P E D , DIRECTLY
FOR
E U R O P E ' S EXPANSIONIST M O R E
B Y
O F COLONIALIST DISCOURSE
TRAVEL NARRATIVES
WRITING
P O S T C O L O N I A L I T Y
TRAVEL WRITING HAS B E E N IDENTIFIED ICS AS A M O D E
S H O U L D
IT?
(Belated Travelers,
1994),
D O M
W H O
SEES
O F N I N E T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y E U R O P E A N TRAVEL WRITING A S CONTRIBUT
ING TO WHAT H O M I
B H A B H A
CALLS A " M E D I T A T I O N
O N THE M Y T H S
O F WESTERN
P O W E R A N D K N O W L E D G E W H I C H CONFINE THE COLONIZED A N D DISPOSSESSED A
HALF-LIFE O F MISREPRESENTATION
A N D B Y INDERPAL
G R E W A L
TIPLE
O F
DISCOURSES
" H A R E M " — " S P A T I A L CALLY
A N D
NATION (4).
A L L
TRAVEL
ANALYZE
I N " E U R O I M P E R I A L "
CONSTRUCTIONS,"
(QTD. W H O
VISIONS
AS S H E CALLS T H E M ,
CONSTRUCT
H O M E
I N B E H D A D
A N D
O F
A W A Y
" T H E HISTORICAL
O N E DEFINED SITUATION
B YS P U R R
M A R K E D
A N D
" M E T A P H O R I
O RE M P I R E
T OA G R E A T E R O R L E S S E R E X T E N T , A D O P T
M E T H O D O L O G Y :
M U L
" H O M E "
THAT
A
A SA NATTEMPT
B YTHE DISMANTLING
A N D
B O D I E S " "POST-
BOTH T O O F
TRADI
TIONAL INSTITUTIONS O F COLONIAL P O W E R " A N D TO "SEARCH FOR ALTERNATIVES THE DISCOURSES " P O S T , "
O F T H E C O L O N I A L E R A " (6).
A W A R E
S P U R R W I S E L Y RESISTS T H E T E M P T A T I O N
COLONIALISM—AS
IF COLONIALISM,
O F A PERIOD
" A F T E R "
A N D VIRULENT
FORMS,
W E R E N O T STILL V E R Y M U C H W I T H U S T O D A Y . N O N E T H E L E S S , H I S D E F I N I T I O N FOCUS O F M U C H
POSTCOLONIAL
C I S M , W H I C H D I R E C T S ITS A T T E N T I O N N O T S O M U C H T O T H E C U L T U R A L O F
THE
F O R M E R
METROPOLITAN FOUNDERS
COLONIES "CENTERS."
A S T O THOSE
O F
POSTCOLONIAL
O NTHESE DEFINITIONAL
THE
\]
S O M E
A N D
CRITI
IMPERIAL
M I G H T
O NT H E
FAILS
PRODUCTION
SELF-DESIGNATED
CRITICISM,
INCONSISTENCIES,
M ' T U H I'MI'MH
TO
O F T H E PERILS O F THE PREFIX
TO S P E A K
I NA VARIETY O F N E W
TO EXPLAIN THE /?RE-TWENTIETH-CENTURY
TO
138);
TRACES T H E
SITES I NT H E C O L O N I A L P E R I O D T H R O U G H G E N D E R E D
O F THESE WRITERS,
COLONIAL"
MIGRATION"
(Home and Harem, 1996),
M E T O N Y M I C A L L Y
AT V A R I O U S
A N D
ARGUE,
TOTALIZING,
ironically dehistoricized v o c a b u l a r y it often deploys in order to talk about irreconcilably different cultures and cultural issues. W i t h the increasing—mostly academic—commodification o f the postcolonial, a further discrepancy has arisen between the oppositional discourses invested in postcolonialism and the marketable exoticism o f socalled postcolonial products. Postcoloniality—not postcolonialism— best describes the present climate within which such strategically "othered" products circulate within the global market. T h e p o s t c o l o nial, in this context, is both an index o f awft'colonial resistance and a code w o r d for the weocolonial process by which cultural "otherness" is assimilated, reproduced, and c o n s u m e d . 18
19
W h a t is the status o f travel writing in the age o f postcoloniality? Historically, travel writing has capitalized on exoticist perceptions of cultural difference: it has made a virtue of, and a profit from, the strangeness o f foreign places and cultures, delivering up t o its mostly white metropolitan reading public what Paul Fussell calls "the exotic anomalies, wonders, and scandals . . . which their own place or time cannot entirely supply" (203). Clearly, travel writing at its worst has helped support an imperialist perception by which the exciting "other ness" of foreign, for the most part non-European, peoples and places is pressed into the service o f rejuvenating a humdrum domestic culture. However, travel writing has also served as a useful medium o f estrangement and as a relativist vehicle for the reassessment and poten tial critique o f domestic culture. Both o f these registers can be seen in contemporary travel writing, which acts alternately as a repository for exoticist forms o f cultural nostalgia and as a barometer for the record ing and calibration o f cultural change. A postcolonial approach to contemporary travel writing—such as that loosely adopted in this sec tion—might therefore seek to examine the continuing complicity between travel writing and cultural imperialism; to analyze new forms of travel narrative that resist these earlier models and that explore the possibilities inherent in travel writing as cultural critique; and, finally, to assess the extent to which these various revisionist or counternarratives are themselves bound up in an ideology o f exoticist consumption. Caryl Phillips's The European Tribe (1987) and Jamaica Kincaid's A Small Place (1988) are two recent examples o f travel narratives set up in opposition to European norms. Both are extended diatribes against European cultural prejudice and, more particularly, against the destructive value-systems enshrined in hierarchies of race. Racism is the subject o f Phillips's often caustic commenlnry, w h i c h draws o n s e v ,|K
11
PI
1 v,IM •» w r i
11 1
'1 r i
\i
n
111 H'I 1
eral o f the tacitly accepted conventions o f European travel writing— the assertion o f race and class privilege, the traveler's license to com plaint, the use o f a nonspecialist genre to pass off personal opinions as sociological observations—but then, twisting those conventions to meet their o w n unspoken biases, "wrestle[s] Europe's face around so that she might at least be forced to stare in the mirror" (xiii). A n d racism is the subject, too, o f K i n c a i d ' s jeremiad on her birthplace, Antigua, a tiny Caribbean island caught in the drifts o f a larger history, its people exploited playthings in the hands o f foreign companies, cor rupt officials, and the tourist trade. B o t h narratives are based on the authority o f their o w n bitter experience: Phillips's recalls a year-long trip as a black m a n in a white-dominated Europe; K i n c a i d ' s returns to an island home distorted out o f recognition by the neocolonial forces of tourism and despotic governments. W h a t is most striking about these narratives, though, is not the general quality o f their anger but the specific hostilities that they direct against their readers. These readers are identified, in each case, as being white Euro-Americans, o f the kind that might read travel writing for the consolations it brings. The consolations, for example, of a tempo rary escape from a work-obsessed society: an escape, however, that confirms rather than threatens the dominant (white) culture. Here, for instance, from Phillips: In your churches, education, government systems, architecture, music, arts, you belong to a group which exports a culture to every corner of the world. . . . Wherever you go in the world, you can carry with you evidence of your visible achievements, and they will be uni versally recognized. . . . [But] your eyesight is defective. Europe is blinded by her past, and does not understand the high prices of her churches, art galleries, and architecture. My presence in Europe is part of that price. (127-28) Or, here, from Kincaid: As your plane descends to land, you might say, What a beautiful island Antigua is—more beautiful than any of the other islands you have seen, and they were very beautiful, in their way, but they were much too green, much too lush with vegetation, which indicated to you, the tourist, that they got quite a bit of rainfall, and rain is the very thing that you, just now, do not want, for you are thinking of the h a r d and cold mid d a r k and long days you spent working in North America (or, worse, H u r o p e ) , earning some money so thai you could slay in this place ( A n l i n u s i ) w h e r e Ihc sun always shines and where
A I ' T K H
HMI'lItt',
t h e s u nis d e l i c i o u s l y h o t f o r t h e f o u r t o t e nd a y s y o u a r e g o i n g t o b e staying there; a n d since y o u a r e o n y o u r holiday,
since y o u a r e a
t o u r i s t , t h e t h o u g h t o f w h a t it m i g h t b e l i k e f o r s o m e o n e w h o h a d t o live d a y i n , d a yo u t i n a place that suffers c o n s t a n t l y f r o m and
drought,
sohas t o watch carefully every d r o p o ffresh water used (while a t
the s a m e time s u r r o u n d e d b y a sea a n d a n o c e a n — t h e C a r i b b e a n S e a o n o n e side, t h eA t l a n t i c O c e a n o n t h eo t h e r ) , m u s t n e v e r cross y o u r mind.
(3-4)
T H E T W OP A S S A G E S I N D I C A T E KINCAID'S O M O U S L Y
THE D I F F E R E N C E I NT O N E B E T W E E N PHILLIPS'S A N D
NARRATIVES—THE
FORMER
P R O V O C A T I V E — B U T
DRYLY
SARDONIC,
T H E LATTER
I NB O T H CASES, T H E WRITER DIRECTS A
V E N
SUSTAINED
A S S A U L T A G A I N S T T H E R E A D E R , D E S I G N E D N O T M E R E L Y T O J O L T H I M O RH E R O U T O F A
FAMILIAR
SENSE O FCOMPLACENCY,
B U T T OA S S O C I A T E
THAT
C O M P L A C E N C Y
W I T H T H E P R O C E S S O FT R A V E L A N DT H E G E N R E O FT R A V E L W R I T I N G . I N T H I S S E N S E , BOTH
WORKS M I G H T
BEST B E DESCRIBED
AS FORMS
countertrzveX
O F
THAT INTERROGATE THE PRIVILEGES THAT ACCRUE HISTORICALLY IN
PHILLIPS'S
TO THE
WRITING
GENRE.
C A S E , T H E S E P R I V I L E G E S A R EA L S O L O O S E L Y C O N N E C T E D T O A
SPECIFIC ITINERARY:
THE G E N T L E M A N ' S E D U C A T I V E CIRCUIT OTHERWISE K N O W N AS
THE G R A N D
T H EG R A N D
T O U R .
EIGHTEENTH
CENTURY
M E A N S — A
KIND
STUDY
O FSOCIAL
A SA FORMATIVE
O F PERIPATETIC GRACES—WAS
NOT SCORN, B Y M A N Y
APPLICATION, B E C O M E NEEDLESS
M O R E
DISSIPATED,
EITHER T O STUDY
I NS O SHORT A TIME TO S A Y ,SUCH
LATER VARIANTS
CASE, HOWEVER,
TOUR ISTAKEN
COMPARATIVE
T H EO U T S E T W I T H S U S P I C I O N , I F
BEST-KNOWN
WRITERS.
J A M E S
SELECTION) A D A M
"RETURNS H O M E A N D M O R E
B U Z A R D
SMITH,
M O R E CONCEITED,
INCAPABLE
O R T O BUSINESS,
THAN
H A DH E LIVED AT H O M E "
(QTD.
WELL
T H EW R Y R E E X A M I N A T I O N
O FTHE
O FTHE
T H EB A C K D R O P
TO, A N D CRIMES
PHILLIPS'S
I N T H E N A M E
O F , A
O FSOUTHERN
E U R O P E , T O M O S C O W
AGAIN TOHISH O M E T O W N ,
2
0
I N
"EDUCATIONAL" FOR A
C O M M E N
"SUPERIOR"
O W NE U R O P E A N TOUR TAKES H I M F R O M CASABLANCA,
BOUNDARIES BACK
C O M M I T T E D
66). THEIR
TRADITION—
TARY, N O T S O M U C H O N CLASS ( O R G E N D E R ) BENEFITS, A S O N T H E PRIVILEGES FALL
H A V E
I NB U Z A R D
WERE WHITE;
BILL B R Y S O N A N D P A U L T H E R O U X .
A STAGE FURTHER, B E C O M I N G
FOR
M O R E
O F A N Y SERIOUS
H E COULD
D E F L A T I N G T H EP R E T E N S I O N S
TRAVEL WRITERS
I N T H E
E N G L I S H M E N O F
F O RT H E
M E N O F L E I S U R E , B YD E F I N I T I O N ,
-IRONICALLY
INCLUDE THE A M E R I C A N PHILLIPS'S
TREATED F R O M
TOURIST
T O P R O M I N E N C E
J O U R N E Y F O R Y O U N G
O T H E R S I NA N A M U S I N G
THE TYPICAL G R A N D
UNPRINCIPLED,
WHICH C A M E
FINISHING-SCHOOL
O FTHE NATION'S
QUOTES F R O M ( A M O N G W H O M
T O U R ,
THAT RACE.
B E Y O N D T H E
O N ITS E A S T E R N E D G E , A N D
L O N D O N . E V E R Y W H E R E H EG O E S , HIS ORIGINAL
THESIS IS C O N F I R M E D : THAT E U R O P E IS A TRIBAL S O C I E T Y , C L O S I N G R A N K S
AGAINST
OUTSIDERS—ESPECIALLY THOSE CONSIDERED AS B E L O N G I N G TOA DIFFERENT RACE.
,>»
' l O d K I S I •. W l l O I Y l ' l W i l l I ' l ' K S
T H E G L O O M O F PHILLIPS'S
NARRATIVE, A L T H O U G H ALLEVIATED B Y A LIVELY SENSE
O F H U M O R , I S A S O P P R E S S I V E A ST H E H E A T I NM O R O C C O , T H E C O L D I N R U S S I A , A N D
T H ER A I N I N L O N D O N . C A S A B L A N C A ,
NEOCOLONIAL JACKBOOT; AN
A R M Y
O F BRITISH
T H ES P A N I S H
TOURISTS;
A N D RUSSIA
, A R R I V E S I NM A N Y
A N D G E R M A N Y
I M M I G R A N T
IDEOLOGICALLY
G E TT H EI M P R E S S I O N
A R E O P E N L Y
LABOR; SCANDINAVIA,
OPPORTUNISTIC.
O FT H E S E C O U N T R I E S T H A N H E W A N T S
:
W E
COASTS SUFFER F R O M T H ET H U G G E R Y O F
F R A N C E , ITALY,
RACIST I N THEIR ATTITUDES T O W A R D HOSTILE,
F O R ALL ITS G L A M O U R , I SU N D E R T H E
PHILLIPS
TOO, IS
N OSOONER
T O LEAVE; A N DOVERALL,
O FA DISAFFECTED, OFTEN FRACTIOUS TRAVELER,
M O R E
A N X I O U S T OP R O V E H I SP O I N T T H A N T OB R O A D E N H I SR A N G E O F E X P E R I E N C E , A N D M O R E
A N X I O U S STILL T O A F F I L I A T E H I M S E L F W I T H O T H E R , M O S T L Y
BLACKS
MUNICATE,
LITTLE I N C O M M O N .
PHILLIPS K N E W
MARGINALIZED,
I NE U R O P E , O N L Y T O D I S C O V E R T H A T H E A N DT H E Y H A V E LITTLE T O C O M
L E A R N S LITTLE F R O M
HIS TOUR, IT SEEMS,
OTHER THAN
WHAT H E
S O W E L L A L R E A D Y : T H A T R A C I S M I SI N G R A I N E D I NE U R O P E ' S S E N S E O F S E L F -
I D E N T I T Y ; A N DT H A T H E , A S A B L A C K B R I T O N , C U L T U R A L L Y A P A R T O F E U R O P E , C A N " F I N D LITTLE E M P A T H Y
(128).
W I T H T H EC U L T U R A L B R A V A D O
L I K E N A I P A U L — W I T H
W H O M ,
O FA EUROCENTRIC
IN C O M M O N — P H I L L I P S
USES TRAVEL WRITING T O E X A M I N E
I N G S O FD I S P L A C E M E N T ,
A N DT O A T T E M P T I NV A I N
DICTION
O F FEELING
BRITISH WHILE
PAST"
IDEOLOGICALLY, H E HAS NEXT TO NOTHING
BEING
HIS N A G G I N G
TO RECONCILE " T H E
CONSTANTLY
FEEL
CONTRA
TOLD I NM A N Y
SUBTLE
A N D U N S U B T L E W A Y S T H A T I D I D N O T B E L O N G " (9).
PHILLIPS POSITIONS
LIKE N A I P A U L ,
WANDERING THE MARGINS O F
A
CONTINENT
HOWEVER,
AS A CONSCIOUSLY LIMINAL THAT
LOCKS
PHILLIPS
RATHER TOC O M B A T
ITSD O O R S
H A S N OW I S H IT—TO M A K E
FIGURE,
AGAINST
" H I S K I N D " ;
T OC A P I T A L I Z E
UNLIKE
HIMSELF,
N A I P A U L ,
O N H I SM A R G I N A L I T Y ,
B U T
O T H E R S R E C O G N I Z E A N DA C C E P T H I S P R E S E N C E :
Black people have always been present in a E u r o p e that has chosen e i t h e r n o tt o see u s ,o r t o j u d g e u s a s a n insignificant temporary,
b u t dismissible,
mistake.
I looked
minority, o r asa
d o w n
at the G r a n d
C a n a l a n dr e a l i z e d t h a t o u r p e r m a n e n c e i n E u r o p e n o l o n g e r upon
white
European
tolerance,
b u t made
a much
more
relied radical
d e m a n d . E u r o p e m u s t b e g i n t o r e s t r u c t u r e t h e t i s s u e o f lies t h a t
con
tinues t o b e taught a n ddigested at school a n dat h o m e f o rw e ,
black
people, a r ea n inextricable peans
must
learn
part
o f this small continent.
A n d Euro
t o u n d e r s t a n d this f o r themselves, f o r there a r e
a m o n g u s f e w w h o a r e h e r e a s m i s s i o n a r i e s . (128-29) L I K E
The European Tribe, A Small Place
CRUSADE AGAINST AS A BLACK
WHITE
RACISM.
U N L I K E
IS T A N T A M O U N T T O A M O R A L
PHILLIPS,
LLRILON R E M A I N S E Q U I V O C A L , K I N C A I D
THOUGH, WHOSE IMMEDIATELY
POSITION
TAKES U P T H E
C U D G E L S O N B E H A L F O F T H E D I S P O S S E S S E D . O R S O IT A P P E A R S A T F I R S T F R O M T H E
AM'KW U M I M i o
'.1
STINGING
RHETORIC
O FACCUSATION
THAT
FLINGS I N THE FACES O F H E R "TOURISTIC" DRAWN,
KINCAID,
A SA NATIVE
A N T I G U A N ,
READERS. T H E BATTLE LINES ARE CLEARLY
A N D THERE CAN B EN OD O U B T AST OKINCAID'S
SIDE:
T H A T T H E N A T I V E D O E S N O T LIKE T H E TOURIST ISN O T H A R D T O E X P L A I N . F O R E V E R Y N A T I V E O F E V E R Y P L A C E IS A P O T E N T I A L TOURIST, A N D E V E R Y TOURIST IS A NATIVE
O FSOMEWHERE. EVERY
WHELMING
N A T I V E E V E R Y W H E R E LIVES A LIFE O F O V E R
A N D CRUSHING BANALITY A N D B O R E D O M A N D DESPERATIONA N D
DEPRESSION, A N DEVERY DEED, G O O D A N DBAD, IS A N ATTEMPT TO FORGET T H I S . E V E R Y N A T I V E W O U L D L I K E T O FIND A W A Y O U T , E V E R Y N A T I V E LIKE T O TAKE A TOUR. B U T S O M E N A T I V E S — M O S T C A N N O T G OA N Y W H E R E . T H E Y A R E T O O P O O R . S O M U C H
FOR ROMANTIC
MYTHS
NATIVES I NTHE
WOULD WORLD—
(18)
O F THE (CARIBBEAN)
N O B L E SAVAGE,
WHICH,
AS K I N C A I D RIGHTLY POINTS O U T , A R E PART O F T H E R A C I S M T H E Y D E N Y . B U T T H E STRENGTH
O FK I N C A I D ' S
ANTITOURIST—IS M A T E , VISITOR. PHILLIPS,
ANTIWHITE,
V E H E M E N T L Y
B Y H E R O W N STATUS AS A RETURNING, I F INTI
( K I N C A I D C U R R E N T L Y LIVES I NT H E U N I T E D S T A T E S , W H E R E ,
S H E M A K E S
HER AT TIMES
P O S I T I O N — V E H E M E N T L Y
C O M P R O M I S E D
A LIVING
LAPSING INTO
TEACHING CREATIVE WRITING.) T H U S ,
NOSTALGIA FOR THE " O L D A N T I G U A , "
HER FELLOW A N T I G U A N S WITH WHAT LOOKS SUSPICIOUSLY I L O O K AT THIS P L A C E ( A N T I G U A ) ,
LIKE
W E FIND
O R VIEWING
LIKE CONDESCENSION:
I L O O K ATTHESE P E O P L E ( A N T I G U A N S ) ,
AND
I C A N N O T TELL W H E T H E R I W A S B R O U G H T U P B Y , A N D S O C O M E F R O M ,
CHIL
D R E N , E T E R N A L I N N O C E N T S , O R ARTISTS W H O H A V E N O T Y E T F O U N D E M I N E N C E I N A W O R L D T O O STUPID T O U N D E R S T A N D , O R LUNATICS W H OH A V E M A D E O W N LUNATIC A S Y L U M , O R A N EXQUISITE COMBINATION L I K E PHILLIPS,
O F ALL T H R E E .
THEIR (57)
K I N C A I D I SO C C A S I O N A L L Y T R A P P E D W I T H I N T H E S A M E
R O M A N
T I C C O N V E N T I O N S O F A G E N R E S H E O T H E R W I S E D E R O M A N T I C I Z E S , S T R I P S O F ITS U M P H A L TIVES
MYTHS.
SUCH
CONCERNED
PHILLIPS'S
A N DK I N C A I D ' S TRAVEL WRITING O P P O S E S
A S N E W B Y ' S
O R O ' H A N L O N ' S ,
WITH D O C U M E N T I N G
WHICH
NARRA
A R E ARGUABLY
LESS
T H E ACTUAL P L A C E S THEIR WRITERS VISIT
THAN
WITH SETTING U P A P L A Y G R O U N D FOR THE ACTING OUT O F THEIR O W N , READERS', PRIVATE FANTASIES.
The European
Tribe
A N D
A N DTHEIR
A Small Place
SOCIOLOGICAL I N THEIR O R I E N T A T I O N , H I G H L Y POLITICIZED I NTHEIR I M P A C T , A B O V E ALL, D E E P L Y C O M M I T T E D
TRI
ARE AND,
T OT H E DRIVE FOR SOCIAL C H A N G E . Y E T T H E Y A R E
ALSO TRAVEL NARRATIVES, I F P O S T C O L O N I A L I NTHEIR P E R S U A S I O N , A N DA S S U C H THEY
REMAIN
COMPLICIT
WITH
T H E TOURISM
THEY
D E N O U N C E .
E S S A Y , F O R E X A M P L E , I SI T S E L F A R G U A B L Y T H E P R O D U C T O F A T O U R I S T I C
KINCAID'S SENSIBIL
racist M O T I V A T I O N , B U T IT A L S O D E R I V E S F R O M A G E N R E T H A T traditionally S E E S itself as A N L I T O U R I S T I C . P H I L L I P S A N D K I N C A I D b o t h s h o w t h e ad van I ages O F A certain k i n d O F T R A V E L W R I T I N G I T Y ; ITS R H E T O R I C O F B L A M E H A S A N A N T I
yi
l O U t U S I S W i l l i T V I'll W W I l | Wt
O N E
THAT
RESISTS,
RATHER THAN
PANDERS
T O , T H EESCAPIST
READERS, A N D THAT INTERROGATES, RATHER THAN ACCRUE TO T H E TRAVELER-WRITER—WHILE HINTING, DICTIONS
INSCRIBED
WITHIN
A GENRE
VERY E C O N O M I C FORCES THAT M A K E T H E
LIMITS
NARRATIVE
O N C E AGAIN, AT THE
SETS ITSELF I N O P P O S I T I O N
SEEKS
Jaguar Smile (1987).
document
TO
O FITS
T OT H E
D E M O N S T R A T E D I N A TRAVEL
RESISTANCE:
S A L M A N
RUSHDIE'S
A S A G U E S T O FT H E S A N D I N I S T A A S S O C I A T I O N
O F C U L ARTISTS,
M U S I C I A N S , C R A F T S P E O P L E , D A N C E R S A N D S O O N ,U N D E R T H E S A M E R O O F I N PHILLIPS'S
CLEARLY
WITH
The
T H E B O O K IS T H E RESULT O F R U S H D I E ' S T H R E E - W E E K TRIP
I N 1986
TURAL W O R K E R S , A N U M B R E L L A O R G A N I Z A T I O N " T H A T B R O U G H T WRITERS,
A S
THAT
CONTRA
IT P O S S I B L E .
O F RESISTANCE A R EALSO A M P L Y
THAT
TO N I C A R A G U A
THAT
FANTASIES
ASSERTS, T H EPRIVILEGES
A N D KINCAID'S
T H E U N D E R D O G :
NARRATIVES,
T H E B O O K
RUSHDIE'S
IS A TRIBUTE
SYMPATHIES
(12). LIE
T O T H E SPIRIT O F
E N D U R A N C E I N W H I C H A N O P P R E S S E D A N DM A R G I N A L I Z E D P E O P L E C O N T I N U E T O RESIST T H E I R S T R O N G E R F O E . T H EE N E M Y I SW I T H I N , I N T H E S H A P E O FT H E ING C O N T R A FORCES, B U T ITISS U P P O R T E D F R O M WITHOUT A N T I - C O M M U N I S T U N I T E D STATES. T H E S C E N E IS A F A M I L I A R COLONIALISM, F O R — O F T E N
A N D I T I S S K E T C H E D B YR U S H D I E C O M I C — D E T A I L
A N D A POLITICAL
WITH
LURK
B Y A NEUROTICALLY O N E O FU . S .
N E O
A TRAVEL WRITER'S E Y E
JOURNALIST'S
E A R F O R CONTRO
V E R S Y A N D S E N S A T I O N A L I S T D E B A T E . T H I S M I X T U R E O FC O M I C T R A V E L O G U E A N D H Y P E R B O L I C POLITICAL C O M M E N T A R Y
R U N S T H E RISK O FTRIVIALIZING
THE OBJECT
O F ITS O S T E N S I B L Y " S E R I O U S " S T U D Y . R U S H D I E C L E A R L Y S I D E S W I T H T H E
SANDIN
ISTAS, AFFILIATING H I M S E L F W I T H THEIR STRUGGLE: W h e n the R e a g a n administration
b e g a n its w a r against N i c a r a g u a , I
recognized a deeper affinity with that
small
country
in a
continent
( C e n t r a l A m e r i c a ) u p o n w h i c h I h a d n e v e r set f o o t . I g r e w d a i l y interested
successful revolt against a great p o w e r , m yconsciousness the of the triumph those
more
i n its affairs, b e c a u s e , after all, I w a s m y s e l f the child o f a
o fthe Indian revolution.
product
It w a s perhaps also true
o f u s w h od i d n o t h a v e o u r origins
in t h e countries
mighty West, o r North, had something in c o m m o n — n o t ,
that
o fthe
certainly,
a n y t h i n g a s simplistic asa unified " t h i r d w o r l d " o u t l o o k , b u ta t least s o m e k n o w l e d g e o f w h a t w e a k n e s s w a s like, s o m e a w a r e n e s s o ft h e v i e w f r o m u n d e r n e a t h , a n d o f h o w it f e l t t o b e t h e r e , o n t h e b o t t o m , looking
u p at the descending
heel.
I
became
a
sponsor
o f the
N i c a r a g u a Solidarity C a m p a i g n in L o n d o n . I m e n t i o n this t o declare an
interest;
wholly
when
[
finally
visited
Nicaragua . . .
n e u t r a l o b s e r v e r . 1 w a s n o ta b l a n k slate.
I did n o t g o as a
(12)
R u s h d i e ' s ties t o N i c a r a g u a t u r n o u t , h o w e v e r , t o b e m o r e c o m p l e x . L o r o n e t h i n g , h e is n g u e s t a n d is t r e a t e d as s u c h w i t h g r a c e a n d c o u r -
A t 1 I:K I'.Mi'iKi'
Y \
TESY, M I X I N G (MOSTLY) A N D
WITH CELEBRITIES A N D THE C O S M O P O L I T A N
FOR A N O T H E R , HIS
MENTARY,
NARRATIVE,
ISC O N T E N T TO R E M A I N
AT T H E LEVEL
LITERARY SET.
TRAVELER'S TALE THAN
FOR THE MOST
SOCIAL
N I C A R A G U A
C O M M E N T ,
ALSO CONTAINS
" T H E
LEADERS (INCLUDING
ASIDES,
FOR INSTANCE, THAT THE " B E A U T Y "
BEAST"
D A N I E L
C O M
PART (AS TRAVELER'S TALES WILL)
O F SURFACES: H E N C E T H E SURFEIT O F A N E C D O T E S , J O K I N G
A N D FOLKSY A P H O R I S M S — H I S
POLITICAL
M O R E
A L O N G S I D E
(90).
INTERVIEWS
O R T E G A A N D HIS F O R E I G N M I N I S T E R )
A CLUTCH O F JOCULAR REFERENCES TO P O P U L A R E U R O P E A N A N D
O F
WITH ARE
A M E R I C A N
CAR
TOONS: THE P O E T E R N E S T O C A R D E N A L IS DESCRIBED AS A " G A R R Y T R U D E A U
CAR
TOON
(43);
O F HIMSELF:
THE RADICAL
A N D AT O N E P O I N T R U S H D I E ,
PRIEST
C O M P A R I N G
THE ANCIENT G A U L S I NTHE F A M O U S U D E R Z O , "
Smile, CAN
NICARAGUA'S
ITSELF B E
C O M P A R E D
G A U L :
NARRATIVE—A TO
THEREBY ROBBING
WRITER'S O W N ENTHUSIASM
VIEW
ILLUSTRATES
POLITICAL
IT ALSO
RAISES
POSITION.
NICARAGUA, CHARGE,"
O F THE
FOR ADULTS,
W H E R E
E N D E M I C
INVESTIGATIVE
H E
WRITER":
A SD O
W H O S E THIS
T OTHE
JOURNALIST
THE H O N O R E D
PHILLIPS
ROLE INCLUDES
A N D
IS NOT
ONLY
" O N
T O A N OPPRESSIVE VIEW
O N T H E RIGHTS,
M A N Y ,
CRITICAL C H U M M Y
LITERARY
A SH E
GUEST. H
E
O F
ANTAGONIST
READILY
ADMITS, I N
SIDE W H O ,
A STHE
P E O P L E I N
ALMOST
WITHOUT
T H E WRITER'S
CAPACITY
INTELLECTUAL
R U S H D I E
NOT
1
SHIES
T H U S ,
, I
POWER:
O F THE OPPOSITIONAL
A W A Y
IS CONTAINED
F R O M
THIS
WRITER—A
THE IDEA
UPSETS
I N
VIEW
RUSHDIE'S APPARENTLY
O F THE INDIVIDUAL. O F THE WRITER
U N D E R
A SA
I D E A O F T H E WRITER AS A "LITERARY M I G R A N T "
LEAST B E C A U S E
WORLDS. '
OUTSIDE
NOT O F THE COLLECTIVE BUT
I D E O L O G U E ; Y E T HIS O W N SUSPECT,
THE
K I N C A I D , A SA " W R I T E R I N
WRITERS
"DISSIDENT"
SERI
A S T O THE
WITHIN A LARGER HISTORY O F RESISTANCE. R E S I S T A N C E IS E M B O D I E D
STATE
STANDABLY,
A N D
THE S A M E
B Y OTHER
FREE-THINKING
LARGELY ROMANTIC BASED
DISCOURSE, MORAL
GENRE,
" T H E FUNCTION
ROLE IS M O D I F I E D ,
IS SURROUNDED
A S A
N I C A R A G U A
M O C K I N G
THE EFFECTIVENESS O F TRAVEL WRITING A SA
E X C E P T I O N , S U P P O R T T H E E X I S T I N G G O V E R N M E N T (70). RESIST
B E H I N D
BUT
T O U N D E R C U T ALL F O R M S O F P U B L I C
"INVITED
Y E T
(70).
BUT
POLITICAL
R U S H D I E ISS E E M I N G L Y C A U G H T B E T W E E N T H E
A WRITER
THE STATE"
INTENDED
DOUBTS,
CLEARLY LIKES TO SEE HIMSELF, OPPOSITION,"
THE
S P E E C H O F ITS P R E T E N S I O N S T O H I G H
O F THE PART-TIME
C O M P L A C E N C Y
THE
Jaguar LIMERICK,
NOVELS, THERE ISA STRATEGIC INFANTILISM
CHILD'S-EYE
B O O K
O U S N E S S — B U T
ITINCORPORATES:
O F A N D
TRUTH.)
RUSHDIE'S
in
B Y G O S C I N N Y
(163). (The
SANDINIX"
TO THE G E N R E THAT
POLITICAL V E H I C L E — I T S CAPACITY
TO
STRUGGLE TO "THAT
F R E N C H COMIC-BOOKS
LIKENS O R T E G A TO " AN E W
ADULT CLAIMS
TO
T O' D O O N E S B U R Y ' "
W H I C H T A K E S ITS T I T L E A P P R O P R I A T E L Y F R O M A N A N O N Y M O U S
C A R T O O N . A SI N R U S H D I E ' S THE
ACCORDING
IT S E E M S
TO A L L O W
I N(HE EPILOGUE
11
H1111
••:
H I M
THE
BEST
of
PARTY IS ALSO
BOTH,
t o The Jaguar Smile, W C L L T U L
1:. " 1 1 1 1 n i ' i ^ 1 1 1 1 1 i r
OR HIM
SWAPPING
STORIES W I T H A N O T H E R AFFLUENT M I G R A N T ,
A N I C A R A G U A N
W O M A N
RETURNING H O M E TOF R A N C E AFTER ATTENDING HER MOTHER'S FUNERAL. BOTH O F THEM
SYMPATHIZE
TIONS.
WITH
(PROPHETICALLY
RUSHDIE'S
We
T H ESANDINISTAS, PERHAPS,
PRESS
WITH A F E W PERTINENT CENSORSHIP
RESERVA
IS T H E HIGHEST O N
LIST.) A F T E R T A L K I N G O N T H E P L A N E ,
parted
in
Madrid,
a n d returned
t o o u r separate
lives, t w o
m i g r a n t s m a k i n g o u r w a y in this W e s t stuffed w i t h m o n e y , p o w e r
and
things, this N o r t h t h a t t a u g h t u s h o w t o see f r o m its p r i v i l e g e d
point
of v i e w . B u t m a y b e w e w e r e t h el u c k y o n e s ; w e k n e w that o t h e r spectives existed. W eh a d seen the v i e w f r o m elsewhere.
UNLIKE N O N E
N A I P A U L — O R ,
O F T H EDISADVANTAGES
OTHER WORK, H E
I N A DIFFERENT CONTEXT,
CO-OPTS
O F MIGRATION
THESE DISADVANTAGES MIGRATION
INTO
P H I L L I P S — R U S H D I E
(ALTHOUGH
T O B EF A I R ,
A R ES H O W N I N A B U N D A N C E ) .
HIS O W N HYBRID
per
(170)
AESTHETICS,
2
2
SEES I NHIS
INSTEAD,
WHICH,
E X P L A I N S THREE Y E A R S L A T E R I N A R E S P O N S E T O T H EF A T E D P U B L I C A T I O N
A S H E O F
The
Satanic Verses, " R E J O I C E S I N M O N G R E L I Z A T I O N A N D F E A R S T H E A B S O L U T I S M O F P U R E . Melange, H O T C H P O T C H , A B I T O F T H I S A N D A B I T O F T H A T I S H O W newness enters the world. I T I S T H E G R E A T P O S S I B I L I T Y T H A T M A S S M I G R A T I O N G I V E S T O T H E W O R L D , A N D I H A V E T R I E D T O E M B R A C E I T " (Imaginary Home lands 394). M I G R A T I O N A F F O R D S T H E P R I V I L E G E O F A M U L T I P L E P E R S P E C T I V E THE
BUT
T H E N S O T O OD O E S T R A V E L I N ITS M O S T
MIGRANTS,
O F C O U R S E , A R EA L W A Y S
O F T W O ( O RMORE) CULTURES THAN H O W E V E R MUCH INFORMATION RARY S O J O U R N S O R TRIPS. DISCOURSE QUENTLY
A DEEPER
FOR VACATIONING
O FMIGRATION,
IN
AVAILABLE TOTHE COSMOPOLITAN
STILL, M I G R A T I O N
A N D HIS A M B I V A L E N T
NICARAGUA.
CONTINUES
F O R
ELITE. ( O B V I O U S L Y ,
FRE
RUSHDIE,
LESS
OBVIOUSLY
S I 11 N E E I S T A K E N
RESIDES
SUCH
I N SHORT SUPPLY.
LUX M O R E
NEED.)
MIGRANT-ORIENTED
STATUS A S A N " O P P O S I T I O N A L "
A
AES
TRAVELER-WRITER
IN T H E WRITER'S
A RHETORIC THAI ALLOWS
T O GIVE H I M SERVICE,
S E A R C H O FA S O L I D A R I T Y A
2 3
IS D R I V E N A B O V E ALL ELSE B Y E C O N O M I C
A N D THIS C O N N E C T I O N
R H E T O R I C O FD I S P L A C E M E N T THAT
T E M P O
LIKE T H E W I D E R
S E E M S T O P R E S U P P O S E A L U X U R Y O FPERSPECTIVE A N DA F R E E D O M
C O N N E C T I O N A P P A R E N T L Y EXISTS B E T W E E N R U S H D I E ' S THETICS
TRAVELERS,
A PART, I S R I V E N B Y ITS O W N CONTRADICTIONS.
A N D F R E E D O M S — H O W E V E R H A R D - W O N — A R E
OBVIOUSLY
SENSE.
UNDERSTANDING
THESE LATTER M I G H T G L E A N F R O M THEIR
Y E TT H EDISCOURSE
O F T R A V E L O FW H I C H IT F O R M S
O F M O V E M E N T URIES
ISATTAINABLE
U N A C K N O W L E D G E D — I N T E R N A L
MIGRATION
G E N E R O U S , CROSS-CULTURAL
LIKELY TO GAIN
UTOPIAN
H I M T O RESIST T H E S T A L E
A N D L OM O V E
ABOUT
T H EWORLD
IN
O F( H E O P P R E S S E D . "OPPOSITIONAL,"
B U TN O N E L H E L E S S
U P B Y T W OCONTEMPORARY
A l l I'M I ' M I ' l l i I
linvrl
UNORLHODOX.
wi ITERS, A L S O O F I N D I A N
BACKGROUND:
A M I T A V G H O S H
Land (1992)
IS, A S ITS SUBTITLE
A N D V I K R A M EXPLAINS,
ELER'S T A L E " : IT U S E S T R A V E L A S A B R I D G I N G TEMPORARY
NARRATIVE
O F G H O S H ' S
E G Y P T WITH H I S HISTORICAL M I D D L E
(1983) STUDIES
A TN A N J I N G
TIBET,
M E T A P H O R TOINTERWEAVE THE
CON
ANTHROPOLOGICAL
RESEARCH
I N RURAL
O FT H E LIFE STORY, O F A
MEDIEVAL
B E N YIJU.
From Heaven
SETH'S
TROUBLED PASSAGE, WHILE
UNIVERSITY
I N C H I N A ,
A N DN E P A L O N H I S W A Y B A C K
CLEARLY
A NADAPTABLE
SCHOLARS GUAGES ABOUT A N D
TRAV
IS, I N A P P E A R A N C E AT LEAST, A M O R E C O N V E N T I O N A L
RELATING T H ESTORY O FSETH'S
F R O M
ACCOMPLISHED
THOSE COUNTRIES'
CULTURAL
HISTORY.
THE MAJORITY
H O M E
A N D ENTERPRISING
O FTHE COUNTRIES
I N D I A N
In an Antique
I N THE GUISE O F A
RECONSTRUCTION
EASTERN TRADER, A B R A H A M
SETH. G H O S H ' S
"HISTORY
TRAVEL
NARRATIVE,
O N LEAVE F R O M HIS
THROUGH
NORTHWEST
W H A T
TRAVELER: BOTH
FAMILIES,
SOCIAL
SEPARATES
O FC O N T E M P O R A R Y
C H I N A ,
TO D E L H I . SETH, LIKE G H O S H , IS
WELL
M E N A R E GIFTED
VERSED I N T H E LAN
T H R O U G H W H I C H T H E Y TRAVEL A N DWELL RESPECTIVE
Lake
CUSTOMS,
SETH
A N DG H O S H ,
TRAVELER-WRITERS
INFORMED
RELIGIOUS
PRACTICES,
THOUGH,
F R O M
IST H EPERSPECTIVE
THAT
T H E Y B R I N G F R O M A HISTORICALLY S U B J U G A T E D CULTURE. T H U S , G H O S H IS INTRO D U C E D TOA FAMILY I N THE VILLAGE O F N A S H A W Y
B Y HISFELLOW SCHOLAR
U S T A Z
SABRY AS a
to Egypt
to d o
research. I Tw a s their d u t y t o w e l c o m e m e [ G h o s h ] into their
student
midst
and
from
India
. . .
a guest w h o h a d c o m e
m a k e m efeel a t h o m e b e c a u s e o f t h e l o n g t r a d i t i o n s o f f r i e n d s h i p
b e t w e e n India a n d E g y p t . O u r countries were v e r y similar, f o r India, like E g y p t , w a s largely A N a g r i c u l t u r a l n a t i o n , a n d the m a j o r i t y o fits p e o p l e lived I N villages, their
like t h e E g y p t i a n fellaheen, a n d p l o u g h e d
l a n d w i t h cattle. O u r countries
ransacked b y imperialists, similar had SETH,
were poor, f o r they h a d been
a n dn o wthey were both
trying,
I N very
w a y s , t o c o p e w i t h p o v e r t y a n dall t h e other p r o b l e m s
b e e n b e q u e a t h e d t o t h e m b y their t r o u b l e d histories.
I NCONTRAST,
M U S T
NEGOTIATE A HISTORY
O FMUTUAL
that
(134) IGNORANCE A N D
CONFLICT: If I n d i a a n d C h i n a were amicable t o w a r d s each other, almost half the w o r l d w o u l d b e a t peace. Y e t f r i e n d s h i p rests o n u n d e r s t a n d i n g ; a n d the t w ocountries, despite their contiguity,
have had almost n o con
tact i n t h e course o f history. . . . [ N ] e i t h e r s t r o n g e c o n o m i c nor
thenatural
affinities o f a c o m m o n culture
interest
tie I n d i a a n d C h i n a
t o g e t h e r . (177-78) C O N C E D I N G NATIONS'
THAT
TIME
A N D PATIENCE
BORDER PROBLEMS,
Mi
WILL
SETH CONCLUDES
I o i . m t s I '1 W 1 I I I
B EN E E D E D THAT
rvniWHI'l
II
T OSOLVE
T H ET W O
t o l e a r n [ o na p e r s o n a l level] a b o u t a n o t h e r g r e a t c u l t u r e is t o e n r i c h o n e ' s life, t o u n d e r s t a n d o n e ' s o w nc o u n t r y better, t o feel m o r e a t h o m e i n t h ew o r l d , a n d indirectly
t o a d dt o t h a t r e s e r v o i r o f i n d i v i d
u a l g o o d w i l l t h a t m a y , g e n e r a t i o n s f r o m n o w , t e m p e r t h ec y n i c a l of national power. G O O D W I L L
IS CLEARLY
A
BELIEVE I N ; B U T UNLIKE N O W
I M P O V E R I S H E D
QUALITY
THAT
G H O S H ,
A S WELL,
W O U L D
LIKE T O
S E T H , H E RELATES ITFURTHER T O T W O O N C E RICH B U T
COUNTRIES
" A C C O M M O D A T I O N
use
(178)
(INDIA
A N D E G Y P T ) ,
A N D C O M P R O M I S E " — B A S E D
R E S P E C T — H A V E HISTORICALLY
M A D E
W H O S E
CULTURES O F
O NM U T U A L
TRUST
A N D
T H E M VULNERABLE TO THE AGGRESSION O F
THE E U R O P E A N IMPERIAL POWERS.
I NTHIS C O N T E X T , G H O S H ' S FINELY CRAFTED
RECONSTRUCTION O FTHE M E D I E V A L
HISTORY O FTHE I N D I A N O C E A N
REGION LINKED GIOUS
B Y C O M M E R C E
A N DT H E CROSS-FERTILIZATION
C U L T U R E S — E M E R G E S A SA C O U N T E R N A R R A T I V E
TORICAL
RECORD: A RECORD M A R K E D
RELI
T O T H EE U R O P E A N
HIS
B Y VIOLENT C O N Q U E S T , T H E WILL T O C O N
TROL L A N D A N D R E S O U R C E S , A N D A U S EO FM I L I T A R Y P E R S O N A L A N DC O L L E C T I V E
R E G I O N — A
O FA N C I E N T
F O R C E I N T H ES E R V I C E O F
GREED.
G H O S H , H O W E V E R , LIKE SETH, TAKES CARE N O T T OPRESENT I N D I A AS A M E R E HISTORICAL ISON
W E I G H E D THE
VICTIM. I N
From Heaven Lake,
O FM O D E R N - D A Y
INDIA
I NF A V O R O FT H E M O R E
ADVANTAGES
BROUGHT
CORUSCATING
ATTACK
COMPARISON
"DEMOCRATIC"
ABOUT
B Y STATE
TAKES O NH I S TRAVELS A C O P Y O F N A I P A U L ' S A
THIS ENTAILS T H E CAREFUL
A N D C H I N A — A
WHILE
NONETHELESS
SHOWS
(SIGNIFICANTLY,
SETH
NATION,
CONTROL.
India: A Wounded
O NT H E " D E G E N E R A T I O N "
C O M P A R
THAT,
O F INDIAN
Civilization: CULTURE
WITH
W H O S E T H E S I S H E C A N N O T A G R E E , B U T A B O O K T H A T STILL I M P R E S S E S H I M W I T H I T S GREAT PASSION G H O S H — A N
A N D RHETORICAL FORCE.) M E A N W H I L E ,
INFORMANT:
In an Antique
INEXPERIENCED ANTHROPOLOGIST, M O R E AT H O M E
THAN I N THE FIELD—IS M A D E MEDICINE.
I N
I N A KIND
O FREVERSE ETHNOGRAPHY,
A RESPONDENT
ABOUT HISH I N D U
I NT H E
T O T A K E A D O S E O F H I S O W N( C U L T U R A L L Y )
T OOTHERS'
G H O S H
ANNOYINGLY
HIMSELF
PERSISTENT
CULTURE A N D , M O R E PARTICULARLY, A B O U T ITS—TO
M U S L I M E Y E S — " B A R B A R I C "
RELIGIOUS PRACTICES.
I NA TETCHY,
CALLY SELF-DEPRECATING E X C H A N G E WITH THE VILLAGE I M A M , T H E LATTER'S ATTACK
O N INDIA
A SA " B A C K W A R D "
Land, ARCHIVE
RELATIVIST B E C O M E S QUESTIONS E G Y P T I A N
CHARACTERISTI
G H O S H FENDS OFF
CIVILIZATION B Y
APPEALING
IRONICALLY T O INDIA'S SUPERIOR MILITARY TECHNOLOGY:
"In m y country ... w ehave guns and tanks a n d b o m b s . A n d they're better t h a n a n y t h i n g y o u ' v e g o t in F g y p t you."
...
"I tell y o u , h e ' s l y i n y , " c r i e d
we're a long w a y ahead o f the
Imam,
his voice rising in
liny. " O u r g u n s a n d b o m b s are m u c h bettor t h a n theirs. O u r s are sec-
AI "I IHU KM I'll!
1
O N D O N L Y TO THE W E S T ' S . " TWO
. . . T H E I M A M
S U P E R S E D E D CIVILIZATIONS,
VYING
A N D I [WERE] DELEGATES F R O M
WITH EACH
OTHER TO ESTABLISH
PRIOR CLAIM TO THE T E C H N O L O G Y O F M O D E R N VIOLENCE. . . . [D]ESPITE
A THE
VAST G A P THAT LAY B E T W E E N US, W E U N D E R S T O O D E A C H OTHER PERFECTLY. WERE
TRAVELLING, H E A N D
I:
WE
T H E
O N L Y DIFFERENCE WAS THAT I H A D B E E N THERE IN P E R S O N : I C O U L D H A V E
TOLD
A G R E A T D E A L A B O U T I T , S E E N A T FIRST H A N D , I T S L I B R A R I E S , I T S
ITS T H E A T R E S , B U T IT W O U L D N ' T BOTH
HAVE MATTERED. W E
O F U S , T H A T ALL T H A T W A S
MILLIONS
MERE
FLUFF:
G H O S H ' S
WOULD
HAVE
AND ONLY
B O O K
ATTEMPTS
O F DESTRUCTION
WITH
A N D
CHALLENGE TO THE FAMILIAR THE W E S T
PHYSICAL
S O M E
SUCCESS
A N D
KIND
A S ITS F R A M E M E N T A L
INTERNATIONAL
(235-36)
TO SET U P
REALPOLITIK.
O F NEOIMPERIALIST
O F REFERENCE,
CONQUEST.
RHETORIC O F R A P P R O C H E M E N T
A N
Y E T
TACITLY
HIS
ESTS O F T H O S E W H O
H A V E
OR WANT
IT. A N D
THIS M A S T E R
IT
ALSO
SUPPORTS
G H O S H
SURROUNDING
ALTERNATIVE— DIA
M O U N T S
TRAVEL WRITING THAT,
IS
A N
WELL
O W N ,
TIC, I D E A O F T R A V E L T E N D S T O O C C L U D E T H E W O R K I N G S
M E A N S
KNOWN,
O F P E O P L E O N T H E L A N D M A S S E S A R O U N D US, T H E W E S T M E A N T
B A S E D O N A HISTORY O F FRIENDSHIP A N D N O N A L I G N M E N T — T O LOGUE
MUSEUMS,
IN T H E E N D , FOR MILLIONS
THIS—SCIENCE A N D TANKS A N D GUNS A N D BOMBS.
ING
W E
W E R E TRAVELLING IN T H E W E S T .
HIM
BOTH
I D E O L O G Y
AWARE
THAT
ESSENTIALLY
O F EFFECTING TRADE B E T W E E N DIFFERENT REGIONS A N D
O F THE
H U M A N I S
O F P O W E R A N D THE
THIS A P P L I E S B O T H
A
TAK
INTER
TO TRAVEL AS AS A
A
M E T A P H O R
FOR THE PROCESS B Y W H I C H K N O W L E D G E CAN B E RELOCATED IN TIME A N D
SPACE.
H E N C E
TO
HIS
CAN
B E
G H O S H ' S
EMPHASIS
O N
ARCHIVAL
RESEARCH
AS
A
COROLLARY
A N T H R O P O L O G Y : A STUDY N O T O N L Y O F THE W A Y S IN W H I C H D O C U M E N T S U S E D
TO (RE)DEFINE CULTURAL HISTORY
E D G E
M O V E S
A N D ,
THROUGH
THAT
BUT
O F THE M A N N E R
M O V E M E N T ,
IS
IN W H I C H
KNOWL
TRANSFORMED.
E D W A R D
S A I D ' S A C C O U N T O F T H E W A Y S I N W H I C H " T H E O R Y " T R A V E L S IS U S E F U L
HERE.
L I K E P E O P L E A N D SCHOOLS O F CRITICISM, IDEAS A N D THEORIES T R A V E L — F R O M PERSON
TO P E R S O N , F R O M
SITUATION
ANOTHER. . . . SUCH M O V E M E N T
TO SITUATION,
FROM
ONE PERIOD
I N T O A N E W E N V I R O N M E N T IS N E V E R
P E D E D . IT N E C E S S A R I L Y I N V O L V E S P R O C E S S E S O F R E P R E S E N T A T I O N A N D T I O N A L I Z A T I O N D I F F E R E N T F R O M T H O S E AT T H E P O I N T O F O R I G I N .
T H E O R Y " 226) O N E SIS:
THE
INSTITU
("TRAVELING
24
RECOGNIZES THE BASIS HERE FOR SAID'S INFLUENTIAL THAT
" O R I E N T , "
AS
IT E M E R G E D
OTHER (EASTERN) REGIONS A N D
AS
A
B O D Y
CULTURES, INVOLVED
" O R I E N T A L I S M "
O F K N O W L E D G E
IMPERIAL
2
5
ORIENTALISM
GOES H A N D
IN
H A N D
WITH WHAT
" I M A G I N A T I V E G E O G R A P H Y " : IT R E D I S T R I B U T E S
TO S E R V E T H E N E E D S O F A D O M I N A N T
i ' 1 1 1 1 1 is I'M
1 u
1 wn|
11
AUTHOR
SAID
K N O W L E D G E IN
CULTURE."' G H O S H ' S
w i i n
THE A B O U T
TECHNIQUES O F REPRESEN
TATION THAT W E R E D E S I G N E D TO ASSERT O R R E C O N F I R M THE INTELLECTUAL ITY O F T H E W E S T .
TO
UNIM
v
NNMILIVE,
CALLS SPACE
IN
THIS
SENSE,
FULFILLS A " C O U N T E R - O R I E N T A L I S T "
TELLS—INCLUDING M I D D L E
THE CIRCULATION
EASTERN/INDIAN
O C E A N
O F A RECUPERATIVE HISTORICAL
FUNCTION:
THE TRAVELS O F W H I C H IT
O F INFORMATION
A B O U T
R E G I O N — A R E F R A M E D
NARRATIVE:
POINT
O F ORIGIN
In an Antique Land,
TURES. T R A V E L WRITING, I N
TATION
THAT
E U R O P E A N
PREDATES
O FHISTORY
MEDIATES
( G H O S H ' S
A N D ,
I NTHE PROCESS, G H O S H
A B O V E
INTERVENTION:
ALL, ITINERANT
K N O W L E D G E THEY ACQUIRED BACK IF G H O S H , I N
B E T W E E N THE
T E M
A N T H R O P O L O G Y A
CAPITALIZED
THE D E M A N D S
IDEAS
O F WAR
SKETCHES A HISTORY
A HISTORY
MERCHANTS;
WAXES
COULD M O V E
M E D I MASTER
B Y PREO F TRAVEL
P E O P L E D B Y PILGRIMS,
A N D
O N E THAT
T OA N O N - E U R O P E A N
In an Antique Land,
GOODS, A N D
Heaven Lake, N O W
CUL
A N D A TRIBUTE T OA " L E G A C Y O F T R A N S I E N C E " E P I T O M I Z E D
(173).
PEOPLE,
Eastern
A N D THE SPATIAL R A N G E O F A N
POLITICS
COLONIAL TRADE
SCHOLARS,
CONTEXT
F O R M E R L Y C O L O N I Z E D C O U N T R I E S . T H E RESULT ISB O T H
O NT H E P O W E R
NARRATIVE)
THE
THE
THAT RESEARCH B A C K T O
A TTHE CONFLUENCE B E T W E E N INTERRELATED
PORAL REACH O F HISTORIOGRAPHY THAT LINKS TWO
WITHIN
WITHIN
O N E THAT, A L T H O U G H S U P P O R T E D I N
P A R T B Y R E S E A R C H D O N E I NW E S T E R N L I B R A R I E S , B R I N G S ITS
A N D
TRACES
THE
SOURCE.
NOSTALGIC FOR A TIME
RELATIVELY FREELY,
W H E N
U N I M P E D E D B Y
From
A N D THE INTRICACIES O F FOREIGN POLICY, S E T H , I N
R E C O G N I Z E S THAT SUCH H E A D Y D A Y S (IF T H E Y E V E R EXISTED)
OVER, A N D THAT M O D E R N - D A Y
T R A V E L E R S , L I K E I TO R N O T , M U S T L E A R N
ARE H O W
BEST TO NEGOTIATE BORDERS THAT ARE THE PRODUCTS O F O F T E N INVISIBLE LINES GEOPOLITICAL SUCH
FORCE. SETH
IS D R A W N
C O N T E S T E D O RM A R G I N A L
K N O W N
A M B I G U O U S L Y
" A U T O N O M O U S " TIBET.
PREDICTABLY,
AUTHORITIES, ERS' RIGHTS.
A S " T H E
B U T STILL
FINDS
XINJIANG,
J O U R N E Y T O PRECISELY
A NORTHWESTERN
N E W BORDERLAND,"
CLOSELY
SETH
I N H I SC H I N E S E
AREAS:
G U A R D E D
HIMSELF
TRAVEL,
A RUNNING BATTLE WITH
FOR SETH,
S E E M S
T OB EL E S S A C E L E B R A T I O N
A CONFRONTATION O F T H E POLITICAL
IN F R E E D O M ' S PATH. T H E DISPUTED
RELATIONS THAT
(178).
HAS
SETH
TRAVEL
O F
H U M A N PLACED
I N D I A - C H I N A B O R D E R ISO N E SUCH
INSUR
KEPT "THESE TWO REALIZES THAT
THE
A N D
OBSTACLES THAT ARE
M O U N T A B L E O B S T A C L E — T H E R E M I N D E R O F A FRAUGHT HISTORY O F
APART
COUNTRY O F
ARGUING ENDLESSLY O V E R ENTRY VISAS, EXIT PERMITS,
F R E E D O M THAN
PROVINCE
A N D T H E PARTLY
A N DS U P E R V I S E D
FIGHTING
O F
GREAT CULTURE Z O N E S "
HIS J O U R N E Y H O M E
(AN
INTERNATIONAL IRRECONCILABLY
UPHILL
STRUGGLE I N
M O R E W A Y S T H A N O N E ) I SO N L Y A S M A L L P E R S O N A L V I C T O R Y I NT H E F A C E O F C O N TINUING TIVE,
CULTURAL I G N O R A N C E A N D
PARTICULARLY
FRIENDSHIP NATIONS NOTE, CAUGHT
ARE
O V E R S H A D O W E D
OR WRENCH
WITH
THE
I N THE
ITSM O D E R N
T H E M
APART.
ATTEMPTED HYSTERIA
POLITICAL SECTIONS, B Y THE
DISTRUST. THE
A SI N G H O S H ' S
RECIPROCITIES
COLLECTIVE
FORCES THAT
In an Antique Land
E X O D U S
O FE G Y P T I A N
O F S A D D A M ' S
" H O L Y "
Al I i n I M I ' I K I
y )
BREAK U P
ENDS O N A
WORKERS
WAR.
NARRA
O F INDIVIDUAL
F R O M
PLAINTIVE A N IRAQ
From Heaven
Lake
ENDS WITH THE TRAVELER'S SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATION O F A CUSTOMS
BARRIER AT T H E INTERNATIONAL
POSITION
O F THESE TWO
TICS
TO ARRIVE
G H O S H WATCHES
O F N E W
SETH,
THE
"FOREIGN
SAFELY H O M E ,
WHILE
GUEST,"
AS W A R
" B O R D E R " :
DELHI.
E N D I N G S AFFORDS A N INSTRUCTIVE
O F DISPLACEMENT:
DIFFICULTY
AIRPORT
FINAL
T H E
JUXTA
LESSON I NTHE IS ABLE
BREAKS
POLI
AFTER
M U C H
OUT I NTHE
G U L F ,
A N X I O U S L Y I NE G Y P T , AS T H E T E L E V I S I O N S C R E E N R E V E A L S
THOUSANDS A N D T H O U S A N D S O F M E N [ITINERANT E G Y P T I A N WORKERS IN ...
THE
IRAQ]
S O M E IN TROUSERS, S O M E IN JALLABEYYAS, S O M E CARRYING THEIR T V
SETS
O N T H E I R B A C K S , S O M E C R Y I N G O U T F O R A D R I N K O F W A T E R , S T R E T C H I N G ALL T H E WAY
FROM
THE HORIZON
T OT H E R E D
SEA,
T H O U G H WAITING FOR THE WATER TO PART.
G O O D W I L L , CAN
F O R ALL ITS
IT REPAIR
W O R L D S H A M
O F TIME
B E N
SEEKING B E H I N D THAT
Y I J U ,
THE A N D
WILL
O W N
ALLOW
ON
HIS
ALLEVIATE E C O N O M I C
SCHISMS
B E T W E E N
DESCENDANTS,
H O M E .
IMPULSE
TRAVEL
G H O S H ,
H I M — O T H E R S
M A Y
F R O M HIS
NARRATIVES
LIKE
SETH,
NOT
RECOGNIZES
THE CHANGING
THAT
CHALLENGE ETHNOCENTRIC
DISCERNIBLE
GLOMERATE: THE I N D I A N SUBCONTINENT. (OR,
BETTER, DE-WESTERNIZES)
AID
TRADE BLOC W H O S E
O F CAREFUL HISTORICAL
N O M I C SETH,
N O R CULTURAL "THAT
THEY
THE
W E S T E R N
THESE CONNECTIONS,
VIEWS
O F A
G E O P O C O N
D E M Y T H O L O G I Z E S
RELOCATING T H E M
I N A N
ARE RETRACED WITH
THE
LESS S A N G U I N E A B O U T
THE
U N I O N . A F T E R ALL, T H E R E A R E N E I T H E R S T R O N G
LINKS B E T W E E N PART
INDIA
A N D
C H I N A :
O F THE S A M E
" T H E
LANDMASS
ECO
FACT,"
M E A N S O F
SAYS
NEXT T O THINKING"
CONSTRUCT,
M O R E
FANTASY THAN O F I N D I G E N O U S CULTURAL CONTACT.
AS P I C O I Y E R S H O W S IN HIS CLEVERLY O B S E R V E D TRAVEL NARRATIVE
(1988),
FINAL
LINKS WITH ANOTHER EASTERN
" A S I A , " L I K E " T H E E A S T , " IS O F C O U R S E A M Y T H I C I Z E D
in Kathmandu
THE
COUNTER-ORIENTAL
G H O S H ' S NARRATIVE
R E S E A R C H . S E T H I SM U C H
ARE BOTH
A PRODUCT O F IMPORTED
FORTUNE
CROSS
N O T H I N G . T H E R E IS N O S U C H T H I N G A S A N A S I A N E T H O S O R M O D E
(178).
PRIVILEGE
O F
EAST—ITSELF A W E S T E R N
LINES O F C O M M U N I C A T I O N
POSSIBILITIES O F P A N - A S I A N
A B R A
DESPERATELY
TIDES
B E SO L U C K Y — T O
N O R
PEOPLES.
H O M E .
EAST. F O R G H O S H , THE M I D D L E
LITICAL C O N F I G U R A T I O N — H A S
A S I A N
A N D
MIGRANTS
G H O S H A N D S E T H P R O D U C E , IN THEIR DIFFERENT WAYS, IST
SCARCITY;
NATIONS
E C O N O M I C
TO TRAVEL, A N D
B O R D E R THAT DIVIDES H I M
MYTHICIZED
THE BEACH AS
DIFFERENCE SEPARATE THE TRAVELING MERCHANT,
F R O M
A PASSAGE HIS
BENEFITS, C A N N O T
HISTORICAL
STANDING
(153)
A S I A N
COUNTRIES
H A V E
C O M E
Y E T
Video Night
INCREASINGLY
TO
SEE
T H E M S E L V E S T H R O U G H W E S T E R N E Y E S . M O R E PARTICULARLY, A S I A , I N S O F A R AS IT CAN G A M
B E U N D E R S T O O D AS A C O M P O S I T E
CULTURAL
O F RESPONSES TO A N D ADAPTATIONS
T H R O U G H
ENTITY,
O F WESTERN COMMERCIAL
A SERIES O F ARRESTING E X A M P L E S D R A W N
III I
I(
I I t \ ' A '. I \
REPRESENTS AN
M I L
I
1
I'L
PRODUCTS.
F R O M T H E D I F L A C 111
I> •' I I
I
|L '.
AMAL
A S I A N
R E G I O N S — R A M B O PHILIPPINES,
I NCHINA,
BASEBALL
E X P O S U R E TO A M E R I C A N NEW,
EXOTICALLY
M U C H
OUT O F AN
E X C H A N G E W A Y
CULTURAL
IMPERIALIST
B YM A R Y
" H O W
FORMS.
SUBORDINATED
rial Eyes 6). READILY
W H A T
PRATT
OR MARGINAL
" W H I L E WHAT
O F IMPORTED
A M E R I C A N
"EXPRESS PLIGHT"
J A P A N E S E
BASEBALL,
NATIONAL
WAYS
THAT
O R DEGREES,
O F A M E R I C A LOCAL
M U C H
A
A N D
A TWO-WAY
TO
SHOW,
CULTURE,
THEY D O
THEIR
O W N ,
INTO
T O THE
PROFITABLE
[THE
CULTURES
POP-CULTURAL
INFLUENCE
M Y T H S CAN B E
E A S T - W E S T
CONTACT
ADAPTED IS VERY
PROCESS:
D E C A D E A G O . . . LINES O F C O M M U N I C A T I O N
W E R E SO CROSSED THAT
E A S T L O O K E D TO T H E W E S T TO B R I N G ITT H E W I S D O M O F T H E E A S T ; N O W , PROCESS WAS REVERSED. F O R WHAT THE ASIANS W E R E OFTEN N O T SO M U C H
BROUGHT O V E R TO THE
F R A G M E N T S O F T H E E A S T AS N E W A N D
VERSIONS O F THE WEST: THE J A P A N E S E PROVIDED T O K Y O - M A D E THE THAIS
ARE
SUBJECT,
IMPERIALISM.
THE IMPERIALIST
IMPERIALIST
A SWELL, THAT
BANDS,
E C O N O M I C
IS REINVENTED A S THE
ALL O F T H E S E A S I A N
TO INDICATE
THIS GIANT
EAST-WEST
COUNTRY'S]
IMPORT,
A N D
E X A M P L E S O F
S T A T E S ; N O R A R E ALL O F T H E M
AS TO S H O W H O W A M E R I C A N
ENDS.
(Impe " C A N N O L
INTO
P R O D U C E
T OA M E R I C A N
I Y E R ' S T A S K , H O W E V E R , I SN O T S O M U C H
MATERI
TO PRATT,
D O M I N A N T
FED
BOR
DESCRIBE
INVENT F R O M
ABSORB
DEFIES
CLEARLY, NOT
TO THE U N I T E D
A TERM
B Y NOTE-PERFECT FILIPINO
A N O T H E R CULTURAL
SPORT.
A N O T H E R
A N T H R O P O L O G Y TO
FILMS,
INDUSTRY,
O P T I M I S M
STRICTLY " S U B O R D I N A T E " SIMILAR
H O L L Y W O O D
M O V I E
NOT S O SYMBOLIC
FORMS.
LISTS N U M E R O U S
P O P SONGS, IMITATED
A MATERIAL (N.P.);
THE
THEY
IYER'S B O O K
PROCESS:
ARISE,
OR METROPOLITAN CULTURE"
F R O M
EXTENTS WHAT
O F THE I N D I A N
HYBRIDS;
EAST'S
THE
transculluration,
CULTURAL
G R O U P S SELECT A N D
E M A N A T E S
T OV A R Y I N G
TRANSCULTURATIVE
I N THE
PRODUCTS
SUBJUGATED P E O P L E S , " ACCORDING
T H E Y U S E I T F O R " (6).
M A C H I N E
F R O M
TO T H E M B Y A D O M I N A N T
CONTROL
D E T E R M I N E
TO
T H E S E
THE REINDIGENIZATION
L O U I S E
ALS T R A N S M I T T E D
WILLIAMS THAT
I M P O S I T I O N AS O U T O F A PROCESS O F
T O A C C O U N T F O R T H I S P R O C E S S IS T H R O U G H
ROWED
IN
DEMONSTRATES
P O P U L A R CULTURE H A S RESULTED I NT H E E M E R G E N C E O F
HYBRID
INVOLVING
FAST F O O D I N N E P A L , H A N K
I N J A P A N — I Y E R
FILLED
L . A .
WITH BANGKOK-STYLE AMERICAN
THE THE WEST
IMPROVED PLYMOUTHS;
BARS; THE
CHINESE
SERVED U P S W E E T - A N D - S O U R P O R K ( ADISH CREATED EXPRESSLY FOR W E S T E R N PALATES). J A P A N E S E C O U N T R Y - A N D - W E S T E R N BARS, K O R E A N GROCERY STORES, VIETNAMESE
FRENCH
THAT THE A S I A N S AND
RESTAURANTS,
HAD ABSORBED
M O R E SUBTLY THAN
INDIAN-RUN
MOTELS—ALL
SUGGESTED
T H E W E S T , A N D M A S T E R E D IT, M O R E
ANYTHING
THAT
COULD
B E IMAGINED
FULLY
in R E V E R S E .
(360) IYER CONCLUDES FROM BE M U D )
THIS,
V E R Y LOOSELY, HINT
GREATER I NTHE FUTURE H U M
M i l l
1110 A M E R I C A N
I M l I II I
I, I
THE A S I A N E M P I R E
E M P I R E ISAT
WILL
PRESENT:
"THE
TWENTIETH CENTURY [HAS
[WILL] S U R E L Y B E . . . A S I A N " RESULT
BEEN] A M E R I C A N ,
(363).
O F A W E S T E R N — M O R E
27
THE TWENTY-FIRST
SPECIFICALLY,
W E S T E R N
SPRING F R O M T H E M TO THEIR C O M M O D I T Y
THE
CAPITALIST—VIEW O F
"GLOBAL CULTURE" THAT REDUCES CULTURAL RELATIONS A N D
N O
CENTURY
Y E T THIS C O N C L U S I O N ISA R G U A B L Y
THE PRODUCTS
THAT
VALUE O N THE WORLD MARKET.
I T IS
SURPRISE TO FIND, THEN, ALONGSIDE IYER'S FASHIONABLE C O M M E N T A R Y
THE A S C E N D A N C Y O F ASIA, A N EQUALLY GLIB REHEARSAL O F M C L U H A N ' S RIES
O N
THAT
M E D I A
CHIMERA,
H A D
SENT THE WORLD
THE
SPINNING
"GLOBAL
A R O U N D
VILLAGE":
O N
THEO
" C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
S OF A S T T H A T
EVERY
WHEEL
C A M E
A R O U N D FULL CIRCLE. T R A V E L FAR E N O U G H E A S T A N D Y O U ' D Q U I C K L Y E N D U P I N THE WEST;
G O ACROSS THE G L O B E A N D
(102).
H O M E AT A L L "
M E D I A
Y O U ' D
SIMULATIONS
FIND
THAT Y O U H A D
N E V E R LEFT
A N D INSTANT INFORMATION
CREATE THE ILLUSION THAT CULTURAL DISTANCE CAN C O N V E N I E N T L Y B E MEANWHILE,
CULTURAL PRODUCTS F R O M B O T H E A S T A N D W E S T CIRCULATE IN
GLOBAL MARKETPLACE, ENCE,
O N C E
TRANSFER R E M O V E D ;
CREATING THE FURTHER ILLUSION
C O N S U M E D ,
IS UNDERSTOOD.
IYER'S
THAT
"GLOBAL
CULTURAL
DIFFER
CULTURE,"
SPEAR
H E A D E D B Y A S I A , IST H E CULTURE O F T H E GLOBAL S H O P P I N G M A L L , W H E R E TURAL
ARTIFACTS
CONSUMPTION. WORLD'S
F R O M
BOTH
tourism,
A N D
LARGEST A N D
EAST
A N D
W E S T
M A D E
FASTEST G R O W I N G
INDUSTRIES
THEIR
LITERARY B Y - P R O D U C T ,
HIS
BUT
THE M O S T
T H E M O S T
OBVIOUS
THAT HIS
CHARACTERISTIC
BALI,
FOR INSTANCE, WHICH
PROVIDES
TRAV
COMPLICIT
T H E Y S E E K TO D O C U M E N T O F I Y E R ' S W R I T I N G I S ITS
V A T E D G L I B N E S S : ITS A W A R E N E S S O F I T S E L F A N D O F ITS S U B J E C T A S A IN
CONSPICU
TRAVEL W R I T I N G — A R E
WITH THE VERY PROCESSES O F COMMODIFICATION EXPLORE.
FOR
O N A GLOBAL SCALE. H E N C E THE
N E V E R FAR B E N E A T H THE SURFACE O F IYER'S NARRATIVE,
E L S — A N D
CUL
AVAILABLE
AS I Y E R R E C O G N I Z E S , IS N O T JUST O N E O F T H E
OUS MANIFESTATION O F CULTURAL C O N S U M E R I S M IRONY,
ARE
THE
A N D CULTI
C O M M O D I T Y .
THE O P E N I N G S E Q U E N C E FOR
IYER'S
NARRATIVE, THE WRITING TENDS TO M I M I C THE SUPERFICIALITY O F THAT W H I C H IT DESCRIBES:
B A L I , F O R A L L T H E V A R I E T Y O F ITS C H A R M S , W A S R E L E N T L E S S I N ITS C H A R M , IT M E A N T T H E S A M E T O E V E R Y O N E W H O
C A M E HERE. I TOFFERED
AND
PARADISE,
A N D P R O V I D E D IT. I T W A S P R E T T Y A S A P O S T C A R D , A N D J U S T A B O U T A S
DEEP.
O N L Y A SPECIAL K I N D O F P E R S O N CAN R E M A I N FOR L O N G IN PARADISE, I N G HIS P E A C E WITH TRANQUILLITY. M O S T P E O P L E , I SUSPECTED, T O O K
M A K TAKING
IT E A S Y P R E T T Y H A R D . H U M A N K I N D , T O I N V E R T E L I O T , C A N N O T S T A N D T O O LIT TLE R E A L I T Y . H E R E A N D
(51)
AGAIN
P H O N E Y
O N E NOTICES, AS I N R U S H D I E ' S
APHORISTIC
REFLECTING IRONICALLY
(I.
1
QUALITY
BACK
O N
THAT
ARE
ITSELF. B A L I ,
11 M I H I S T S W I T H
WORK, THE ANECDOTAL
THE EFFECTS O F TRAVEL TIBET,
and C H I N A ,
l V i ' I W ML M 1
TONE
WRITING
1educed T O
THEIR O W NADVERTISING JINGLES, ARE LIKENED T OA GIANT V I D E O SCREEN O F C O N SUMABLE
TOURISTIC
IMAGES.
W E A P O N I N THE A M E R I C A N [A]s
V I D E O ,
AS IYER'S
POP-CULTURAL
TITLE I M P L I E S ,
IS A
PRIMARY
ARSENAL:
t h e w o r l d g r e w s m a l l e r a n d e v e r s m a l l e r , s o t o o d i d its p r o p s :
only
had
distances
in
time
and
space
been
shrunk,
but
the
w e a p o n s o f cultural w a r f a r e — v i d e o s , cassettes a n d c o m p u t e r
not
latest disks—
w e r e far m o r e portable t h a n the big screens a n d h e a v y instruments a
decade
points,
before. T h e y
could
under barbed-wire
a l m o s t , as a w h i m .
be
smuggled
fences a n d
through
into distant
border
of
check
h o m e s as
easily,
(5-6)
I Y E R ' S P R O J E C T IS T O D E M O N S T R A T E A S I A ' S C O U N T E R T H R U S T T O CULTURAL I M P E R I A L I S M , T O S H O W
ITS C A P A C I T Y
VENT W E S T E R N CULTURAL PRODUCTS
WHILE
TO ABSORB,
PROVIDING
A M E R I C A N
ADAPT,
A MIRROR
A N D REIN
THAT
REFLECTS
THE W E S T BACK
O N ITSELF A T N E WA N G L E S A N D I N N E W F O R M S . B U TT H I S P R O J E C T
IS U N D E R M I N E D
B Y IYER'S RELUCTANCE TOC O M E TOTERMS WITH HISO W N TECH
N O L O G I E S O FR E P R E S E N T A T I O N , A N D T O A D M I T T H E I R I N V E S T M E N T OGY
O FCONSUMERISM
H E SETS O U T T O CRITIQUE.
CONFESS HIS RELATIVE IGNORANCE AS A
IN T H E IDEOL
H E IS C E R T A I N L Y
READY TO
TOURIST:
I m a k e n o claim to be authoritative
a b o u t the places I visited.
Quite
the o p p o s i t e , in fact. I s p e n t n o m o r e t h a n a f e w w e e k s in e a c h
coun
try, I speak n o t a w o r d o f a n y o f their languages a n d I h a v e never mally studied any Asian culture....
for
I n s t e a d , I let m y s e l f b e l e d b y cir
cumstance. Serendipity was m y tour
guide, assisted b y caprice.
. . .
W h a t r e s u l t s is j u s t a c a s u a l t r a v e l e r ' s c a s u a l o b s e r v a t i o n s , a s e r i e s first
impressions and second thoughts loosely arranged around a
b r o a d ideas. T H E
(24)
O N L Y SPECIAL
CULTURAL INDIAN
QUALIFICATION
I QUICKLY
ALIES A N D T H EM I X E D W H E R E " (24). TRADITION RATIVE
H E CLAIMS,
I N FACT, IS H I S O W N
HERITAGE: " A S A BRITISH SUBJECT, A N A M E R I C A N CITIZEN,
B E C A M E
ACCUSTOMED
" H Y B R I D "
RESIDENT A N D A N
TO CROSS-CULTURAL
FEELINGS O FEXILE. N O W H E R E
W A S H O M E ,
A N O M
A N D EVERY
Y E T DESPITE HISAPPARENT HONESTY (WHICH BELONGS TOA LONG
I N TRAVEL WRITING, THE AUTHOR'S O P E N I N G DISCLAIMER),
ARGUABLY
IDEOLOGY
of few
CONCEALS
O N WHICH
T H EE C O N O M I C
IT IS B A S E D .
IYER'S
MOTIVES
WRITING,
IYER'S
NAR
A N D T H E CONSUMERIST I N THIS SENSE,
O FTHE A M B I V A L E N C E
O N
IT D E M O N S T R A T E S C L E A R L Y T H A T T R A V E L E R S , I N A L A T E - T W E N -
T H EO N E H A N D ,
TIETH-CENTURY CHANGING WORLD,
CONTEXT,
MUST
CONFRONT
O FPOSTCOLONIAL TRAVEL
PROVIDES
ANOTHER REMINDER
A. W O R L D
O F SHIFTING
BORDERS, A N DD E N S E L Y P A T T E R N E D TRANSNATIONAL
TRAVELER-WRITERS
SUCH
UK IYER, COSMOPOLITANS
M ' T I I H KM
MI
FLOWS. FROM
NARRATIVE.
ALLEGIANCES, I N SUCH
A
M I X E D C U L -
TURAL B A C K G R O U N D S ,
ARE N OLONGER THE EXCEPTIONS THEY O N C E WERE; O N THE
CONTRARY, THEY M I G H T YET I NTIME
B E C O M E
THE GENERAL RULE. T H U S ,
THEIR TRAVEL B O O K S M I G H T B E S E E N I N A SENSE AS COURA/ERNARRATIVES, AS
THEY PIT THEMSELVES AGAINST
I M P E R I A L I S M STILL D O M I N A N T THAT
WORLD,
WITH
A ST H E A N T H R O P O L O G I S T
DIFFERENCES EXTENSION IMAGES,
THEIR
A R J U N
A N D DISJUNCTURES, T H EW E S T ]
FORMS
O FW E S T E R N
CULTURAL
W I T H I N T H E G E N R E , T H E Y ALSO REFLECT O N A W O R L D
accords
INCREASINGLY
T H EV A R I O U S
WHILE INSOFAR
O W N E X P E R I E N C E — A
A P P A D U R A I
I N WHICH
DESCRIBES
" T H EU N I T E D
DIASPORIC
IT,O F G L O B A L
STATES
ISN O LONGER T H EP U P P E T E E R O FA WORLD
B U T IS O N L Y O N E N O D E O FA C O M P L E X
O F IMAGINARY
LANDSCAPES"
WRITING, SUCH
A SI Y E R ' S , W H I C H
("DISJUNCTURE
TRANSNATIONAL
[ A N D , B Y SYSTEM O F
CONSTRUCTION
A N D D I F F E R E N C E " 327).
TRAVEL
SIFTS T H E C O M P L E X C O D E S O FW H A T
M A R T I N
R O B E R T S CALLS T H E " G L O B A L I M A G I N A R Y , " SERVES A U S E F U L P U R P O S E I N A D J U S T ING
A N D COMPLICATING
ITSREADERS'
PERCEPTION
O F T H E WIDER
WORLD.
N O N E T H E L E S S , O N E W O N D E R S W H E T H E R I Y E R ' S W O R K M I G H T B E S E E N LESS RATELY AS A G A U G E THAN
symptom
AS A
O F THE C O M M O D I F L E D
W H I L E
Video Night in Kathmandu
NIZATION"
OSTENSIBLY
O FA S I A , A N A L Y Z I N G T H E VARIOUS
OPPOSES THE
RATHER THAN
D U R I N G
A CRITIQUE,
GICALLY CONJURES. almost
2
9
AS E X E M
A CELEBRATION,
O FT H E I N T E R C O N N E C T E D N E S S O FC O N S U M E R
CULTURE,
H U M A N I S M THAT SUCH A CULTURE STRATE
ITSEEMS, SAYS D U R I N G ,
THAT
everyone, almost everywhere, loves the global
popular a n d
s o m e t i m e s c o n s u m e s it: it p r o d u c e s a m o o d i n w h i c h e x o t i c i s m , mality a n dt r a n s w o r l d
SERVES.
"COUNTER-STRATEGIES" THAT A R E
CALLS " T H E G L O B A L P O P U L A R " :
A N D A TRIBUTE T O THE TRANSNATIONAL
CUL
" C O C A - C O L O
P L A N N E D I N ITS R E S I S T A N C E , ITM I G H T A L S O B E S E E N P A R A D O X I C A L L Y PLIFYING WHAT S I M O N
8
ACCU
"GLOBAL
T U R E " O N W H I C H I TR E P O R T S A N D I N W H O S E I N T E R E S T S I TI N A D V E R T E N T L Y
2
s h a r e d n e s s c o m b i n e , a n di n w h i c h
nor
consump
tion w a r m l y glows. T h e global p o p u l a r ' s h u m a n i s m c a n n o t b e dis missed, precisely
b e c a u s e it is s o o p e n l y c o m m e r c i a l .
Its
"general
m a g i c " relies o n t h e t r i c k b y w h i c h g l o b a l m a r k e t s , t e c h n o l o g i e s a n d information
flows
fuse
into
a
humanism
transcending
national
b o u n d a r i e s a t t h es a m e t i m e as, i n its clear d e p e n d e n c e o n m a r k e t i n g , it l e a v e s i n t a t t e r s t h e i d e a l i s m a n d n a i v e a p p e a l t o h u m a n n a t u r e s o integral t o older h u m a n i s m s . "POSTCOLONIALISM," CIPATION
THAT
SAYS D U R I N G ,
TENDS TO OBSCURE
(343) RELIES O N A LOCALIZED RHETORIC O F T H ELARGER " R H Y T H M S
E M A N
O F GLOBALIZATION"
THAT D E T E R M I N E O U R CULTURAL FUTURES. P O S T C O L O N I A L I T Y , A S H A SB E E N A R G U E D HERE, ISA BETTER TERM TO DESCRIBE T H E CONDITIONS TIONAL"
CULTURAL
PRODUCTS
UNDER WHICH
ESPECIALLY THOSE PRODUCTS,
I N G , THAT A R E I N V E S T E D I NT H E POLITICS O F (CROSS-)EULLURNL
((14
loiJKIS'M
Willi
I YI'tSwHIl 1 1
" O P P O S I
LIKE TRAVEL
WRIT
REPRESENTATION
ARE
SUBJECT
POTENTIAL
TO
GLOBAL
MARKET
FOR RESISTANCE.
"ANTIRACIST"
OR KINCAID'S; "RESISTANCE" ENTALIST" NARRATIVES
FORCES THAT
SUCH
S U C H AS
AS R U S H D I E ' S ;
THEIR
PHILLIP'S
"COUNTER-ORI
OR SETH'S; "ANTI-IMPERIALIST"
T I V E S S U C H A S I Y E R ' S : ALL O F T H E S E A R E T H E P R O D U C T S MODELS,
OR MYSTIFY
TRAVEL NARRATIVES
NARRATIVES
S U C H AS G H O S H ' S
U N D E R M I N E
NATIVES
TO E U R O P E A N
COMBAT
CENTURIES O F E U R O P E A N PREJUDICE, A N D
DIFFERENT WAYS
NARRA
O F WRITERS S E E K I N G ALTER
O F SEEING THE WORLD THAT E N J O I N THEIR
THAT
READERS
I N T U R N T O A D J LIST T H E I R A T T I T U D E S A N D P E R C E P T I O N S T O A C O N T E M P O R A R Y TURAL CLIMATE
I N W H I C H " D I F F E R E N C E " IS I N C R E A S I N G L Y
SARILY BETTER U N D E R S T O O D .
Y E T THESE WRITERS
A PERCEPTUAL LEGACY O F EXOTICISM: ING,
FUELING E U R O P E A N
PRODUCTION
FANTASY,
A N D CONSUMPTION
A M O D E HAS
LOOK VERY DIFFERENT IN KIND
POSTCOLONIAL THEY MUST
STRUGGLE TO M A T C H
M A N Y
WAYS
NESS"
E V E N
ESTRANGES
TRAVEL WRITERS,
ANTITHETICAL AS
O N
IT C L A I M S THE
THESE MYTHOLOGIES THESE
MYTHS
MOST
IN
THEIR POLITICAL
A N D
IT.
THEIR
TRAVEL
NARRATIVES
INVENTORY O F FAMILIAR REVISION
A N D
A N D
IMAGES
IS
A N D
DOUBLE
NATURE,
i
0
E V E N
AS
A N D
THOSE
IT
A M O N G
FORM
PROVIDING
TOWARD
IN
"OTHER
PLACES. S O M E
UNDERPINNINGS,
A N D A M E A N S
HMI'IIM,
PLACES.
LEAST
3
U P
EMBATTLED:
RELIANT N O T
SELECTIVE—CHAPTER.
CRITIQUE.
A I i IN
THAT
MYTHS.
THE
POSTCOLONIAL
MANUFACTURES
TO PARTICULAR
IDEOLOGICAL
REVEAL THEIR SPATIAL
THAT
O F WESTERN
SUBJECT FOR THE FOLLOWING—NECESSARILY TOO,
VEHICLE FOR
V I E W S W I T H A G E N R E T H A T IS
GENRE
DEMYSTIFY
FAMILIAR
WITH WRIT
E V E N I F T H E E X O T I C A IT T H R O W S
ARE THE ONES ATTACHED
O F PLACE,
AS A P R I M A R Y
CONTEXT, ARE NECESSARILY
TO T H E M — A TO
IN W H I C H TRAVEL
F R O M THOSE O F EARLIER TIMES
THIS
CUL
NECES
C O N T E N D , AS WELL,
O F VISION
ACTED
BUT NOT
O F CULTURAL " O T H E R N E S S . " IN A
E R A , " O T H E R N E S S " IS A P R O F I T A B L E B U S I N E S S , MIGHT
MUST
VISIBLE
O F THE
HERE,
BOTH
AN
IMAGES'
Chapter two Zones
T H E DESIRE TO TRAVEL TO, A N D A C C O U N T FOR, PARTICULAR REGIONS O F THE OFTEN IN
FIGURES
FACT,
I NT H E F R A U G H T M O T I V A T I O N S
C O N T E M P O R A R Y
E U R O P E — H A S TION
TRAVEL
WRITING—AT
LEAST W H E N
O F REGIONS
THAT
ARE
SPECIFIED
THROUGH
TO THE
FIFTEENTH
THE
T OA C C R U E E V E R D E N S E R L A Y E R S O F T E X T U A L I T Y
O F
W E S T E R N
A SE U R O P E A N
CLASSIC B O O K S
ABOUT
CRYSTALLIZA
LATER, THESE
C O N D U C T E D VISITS I NT H E W A K E O F E A R L I E R " D I S C O V E R I N G " NEERS. I NTURN, THESE TRAVELERS' N O W
A N D
PROCESSES
CENTURY.
WORLD
WRITERS.
IT IS N O T
ARGUABLY E V O L V E D F R O M THE IDENTIFICATION
IMPERIALISM, TRACING BACK WERE
O F C O N T E M P O R A R Y TRAVEL
REGIONS
TRAVELERS
A N D EXPLORING
H A V E
S P A W N E D
PIO
NARRA
TIVES THAT, S T R I P P E D O F I M M E D I A T E P I O N E E R I N G THRILL, A T T E M P T TO R E C A P T U R E IT T H R O U G H R E C O L L E C T I O N , P A R O D Y , R E V I S I O N , T H U S , E V E N W H E N THE
TRAVEL
SERVATIVE, CAL
ITSTRIVES TO C O M M U N I C A T E
C O N T E M P O R A R Y
VERSIONS.
TRAVELER'S
WRITING,
T H I S
ACCOUNT
SERVING
CHAPTER
A T BEST
T OREPEAT A N D
E X A M I N E S
THE
A M A Z O N
("EXOTIC"); A N D
FICTION
A N D
("TROPICAL");
THE ARCTIC
CONSTRUCT
(MAINLY)
A N D
J A P A N
("LIMINAL").
D E P L O Y T H E M ,
POLITICAL,
THEY
B E C O M E
BRIAN
M C H A L E
ANTHROPOLOGICAL, C O M P L E X
TEXTUAL
ARE A TBEST
1
I N
INCIDENTALLY
A N D
Postmodernist
O F POSTMODERNISM.
P R O D U C E D
B Y SUCH
LID IONS
ii'
G E O
E X P E R I E N T I A L —
Fiction (1987),
IN. P O S T M O D E R N I S T
IS I N E V I T A B L Y
SEAS
WRITING
K N O W L E D G E — H I S T O R
A C C O R D I N G T O M E L T A L E , G E O G R A P H I C A L S P A C E ISC O N T I N U A L L Y SPACE
C O N G O
SOUTH
USES " Z O N E S " LO D E N O T E THE ONTOLOGICAL SCRAMBLING
H E S E E S A SC H A R A C T E R I S T I C
T H E
WRITING
THE
REGIONS, A STRAVEL
CULTURAL, MYTHICAL,
zones.
THE
C O N
TROPOLOGI-
TRAVEL
REGIONS:
("ORIENTAL"); S U C H
EARLIER
IS INHERENTLY
POSTWAR
GRAPHICAL; BUILT U P OUT O F SEVERAL DIFFERENT KINDS O F ICAL,
S U P P L E M E N T
CONSOLIDATE
AS IT RELATES T OS E L E C T E D G E O G R A P H I C A L / T R O P O L O G I C A L A N D
REFUTATION.
C H A N G E O R FRESH PERCEPTION,
WILL
F O R ALL I T S S E N S A T I O N A L I S M ,
ITS NARRATIVES
MYTHS.
OR, I NS O M E CASES,
THAT FICTIONS,
RECONSTRUCTED.
OVERDCTCRMINED:
IT
NEEDS
TO
M E R E L Y
B E
SEEN,
THAT
GEOGRAPHICAL,
IS,
IN
TERMS.
IDEOLOGICAL TRAVEL
A N D
MYTHICAL,
NARRATIVES
TEND
TO
RATHER
THAN
PRODUCE
SIMI
LARLY O V E R D E T E R M I N E D S P A C E S — E V E N IF, B Y A N D L A R G E , P O S T M O D E R N I S T IS N O T THAN
O N
THEIR A G E N D A
" M Y T H "
IT S U G G E S T S
FOR THESE NARRATIVES'
THAT
" [TRADITIONAL
. . . IN EFFECT TRANSCRIBE D O M
A N D
ING
IS
C O M M O N
THAT
R E A D I N G F R O M
( M C H A L E
ENCYCLOPEDIA
TRAVEL NARRATIVES THAT
O F
TURAL DISCLOSER. N O R THE MOST
EXTRACT
IS M O R E SPACES THEIR
PLAY TELLING
BECAUSE ATTRIBUTES
IS
47).
WIS
Y E T AS FAR AS TRAVEL
ALREADY
TOPOI
WRITTEN:
WRIT
C O M P O S E D
O F "CONVENTIONAL
O F
W I S D O M
T H E M IN THE OVERDETERMINED
CUL
O F TRAVEL.
THE
F R O M
TRAVELER
EXPERIENCING
O F THE Z O N E , SUBJECT,
RATHER
NECESSARILY
TRAVELER AS PIONEER/DISCOVERER OR
CUL
IS IT J U S T T H A T A " L A S T F R O N T I E R " N O L O N G E R E X I S T S ;
FOR
CONSCIENTIOUS
NOVELTY
THE PERSPECTIVE
AS
INHIBITS PERCEPTION O F THE M O D E R N
E V E N
" Z O N E "
ENCYCLOPEDIA O F CONVENTIONAL
K N O W L E D G E , " E M B E D D I N G
TURAL DISCOURSE
4).
CATALOGUES O F PLACES A N D
ENDLESSLY R E D E P L O Y THE
A N D C O M M O N
THAN
THIS
CHAP.
GEOGRAPHICAL/TEXTUAL
THE UNWRITTEN
K N O W L E D G E "
CONCERNED,
ACCOUNTS
(SEE, H O W E V E R ,
A N D
O F M O D E R N
EXCITEMENT
F R O M
TRAVELERS M U S T
THE
FRONTIERS
ALSO
THAT
LABOR
O N C E
TO
EXISTED.
F U R T H E R M O R E , THE TRAVELER'S E X P E R I E N C E , FIGURED IN RELATION TO THE
Z O N E ,
G E N E R A L L Y T A K E S ITS C O L O R I N G F R O M
PREVIOUS
SEAS,
FOR
PROSPECTIVE
INSTANCE,
HEDONISTIC A W A K E N S L O U I S
CAN
STILL
PARADISE,
APPEAL
TO
THE " D R E A M S
ACCOUNTS;
IF T H E S O U T H
VISITORS
AS
A N D WISH-FULFILMENTS"
ARE LIKELY TO REPEAT THOSE OF, SAY, H E R M A N
A N
UNSPOILED
( M C H A L E
R O B E R T
STEVENSON.
T R A V E L WRITERS
TODAY,
LIKE M O S T
O F THEIR PREDECESSORS, T E N D TO
WITH PROFESSIONAL ETHNOGRAPHERS THE Y E A R N I N G TO ESTABLISH
A
CASES,
THE TRAVELER-WRITER
AS P E R S O N A L , THAT A R E A L W A Y S
MOBILIZES
FANTASIES,
ENTIAL CATEGORIES O F THE Z O N E : IN THE ARCTIC, PURGATION
WRITING, F R O M DISCOVERY,
INSOFAR
DEPARTURE THAN
AS
O N RETURN. T H U S ,
O F E X C H A N G E A N D
ACQUISITION,
THE RESERVES O F PREVIOUS T H E
HIS
PREDECESSOR
tiJI
EXPERI
ORIENT.
SEEK
W H A T
WHILE
THEY
K N O W
M O R E
TRAVEL
TRAVEL WRITING SUSTAINS
IT O F T E N E N D S U P
B Y
COLLAPSING
THAN
FULLY
O N
THE ALLURE BACK
O N T O
JOURNEYS.
Z O N E S O F TRAVEL WRITING, T H E N , ARE Z O N E S O F REPETITION,
IT IS A C A S E O F R E D M O N D BY
COLLECTIVE
A N D
SEEMS TRAPPED WITHIN QUEST RATHER
QUESTERS
IN
IN J A P A N , THE DESIRE FOR
SEEKS EXPERIENCE O F THE FEMINIZED
THIS PERSPECTIVE,
Y E T
AS WILL B E S E E N , T H E DESIRE F O R
SEEKS EXPERIENCE O F THE LIMINAL; WHILE
A POETICIZED EROTICISM
AS M U C H
ALREADY ENTANGLED IN THE M Y T H S
SHARE
RECIPROCITY
W I T H T H E P E O P L E A N D PLACES T H E Y VISIT A N D A B O U T W H I C H T H E Y WRITE. M O S T
IT
55)
MELVILLE OR
O ' H A N L O N
PETER
F L E M I N G
STEPPING EASILY IULO LO E X C E E D
11 >i 11-: is 1 s w 1 1 M 1 v i'i
IT
» 11
IN
THE ROLE THE
WHETHER VACATED
A M U / O N ,
OR
R o l a n d Barthes assuming the stock m e t a p h o r o f penetration—to con test i t — i n J a p a n . T h e ( W e s t e r n ) m y t h o l o g i e s t h a t a d h e r e t o w o r l d sites seem u n s h a k a b l e a n d offer a n e c o n o m i c a l , i f fairly basic, w a y o f get ting t o k n o w the w o r l d . B u t can the travel b o o k offer more? A s " p o p ular" c o m p e n d i u m s o f different kinds o f disciplinarity—history, geog r a p h y , politics, a n t h r o p o l o g y — t r a v e l b o o k s offer c o m p r e h e n s i v e a n d i n f o r m e d c o m m e n t a r y , a route along w h i c h travelers, w h e t h e r a r m c h a i r o r field, c a n b e c o m e k n o w l e d g e a b l e a n d o p e n - m i n d e d a b o u t t h e c o n t e m p o r a r y w o r l d . A f e w o f these b o o k s d o u b t l e s s d o p r o v i d e such routes. M a n y m o r e , h o w e v e r , either contain the travel z o n e w i t h i n the cultural stereotypes they p r e s u p p o s e f r o m the outset o r c a n n o t n e g o t i ate those b o u n d a r i e s , m a i n t a i n e d b y a n e c o n o m i c a l l y a n d culturally p o w e r f u l t r a v e l i n d u s t r y , w i t h i n w h i c h t h e t r a v e l b o o k cleaves t o its preassigned generic p a t h .
ZONE
THE
ONE: THE
TROPICS
CONGO 2
N e a r l y every m o d e r n travel b o o k that features the C o n g o as travel z o n e a t s o m e l e v e l r e i n s c r i b e s C o n r a d ' s classic n o v e l l a Heart of Dark ness (1898). I n Heart of Darkness, as is w e l l k n o w n , C o n r a d set o u t t o contest aspects o f B e l g i a n imperial practice in the late nineteenth c e n t u r y w h i l e expressing, a t the s a m e time, the imperialist p a r a d i g m i n its starkest f o r m . N e a r l y a c e n t u r y later P a u l H y l a n d , i n his C o n g o n a r r a t i v e The Black Heart (1988), c e r t a i n l y h a s C o n r a d i n m i n d w h e n h e observes that "[i]n a n age o f optimistic materialism [white m e n ] held u p t h i s b a r e l y m a p p e d t e r r i t o r y as a m i r r o r t o t h e d a r k side o f t h e i r s o u l s " (63). S i n c e C o n r a d , t h e C o n g o h a s b e c o m e t h e t e x t u a l site o f a f e b r i l e metaphysics: a n abject z o n e o f e x t r e m e yet undifferentiated " o t h e r ness" in w h i c h every aspect o f life- landscape, people, culture, poli t i c s — p r e s e n t s i t s e l f as a l w a y s a l r e a d y w r a p p e d i n m e t a p h o r a n d m y t h . 3
T h e C o n g o t r a v e l e r is first a p t t o l o c a t e u n d i f f e r e n t i a t e d " o t h e r ness" in the landscape. T h e celebrated Africanist Basil D a v i d s o n — n o t o t h e r w i s e k n o w n f o r his travel w r i t i n g — o f f e r s t h e f o l l o w i n g p a r o d y o f C o n r a d a n d G i d e in a formulaic view f r o m a boat: The
checks its d i l a t o r y p u c e o n c e a d a y o r s o m e t i m e s halls at small l o g q u a y s i d c i H , e a c h w i t h its h a n d f u l o f b u t t h e s e arc figure* In a b r o o d i n g v o i d . D n y s a h e a d t h e r e
river s t e a m e r
more,
and
humanity,
w i l l bo 11 r i v e r s i d e l o w n l e l U ' l m i ^ i i i j ! 10 l l i r " m o d e r n
w o r l d " o f futile
b u s y w o r k . B u t this w i l l be a b r i e f glimpse o f u r b a n dust a n d d e c a y b e f o r e the b u s h a n d the trees close i n a g a i n , a n d e v e r y t h i n g is o n c e a g a i n as it w a s b e f o r e . N o t h i n g changes; there is o n l y the i m m e m o r ial m e r g i n g o f o n e d a y i n t o the next. (254) A t t h e b e g i n n i n g o f h i s e a r l i e r j o u r n e y , d o c u m e n t e d i n Travels in the Congo (1927), G i d e h a d p r o n o u n c e d h i m s e l f d e p r e s s e d b y " [ f j h e a b s e n c e o f i n d i v i d u a l i t y , o f i n d i v i d u a l i z a t i o n . " " E v e r y t h i n g is u n i f o r m , " complains G i d e ; "there can be n o possible predilection f o r a n y p a r t i c u l a r s i t e " (137). T h e C o n g o , t h a t is, o f f e r s n o p o i n t w h e r e t h e W e s t e r n observer m i g h t f r a m e , perspectivize, a n d i m p o s e spatial pat tern. B u t t h e absence o f spatial pattern also denotes a historical absence: C o n g o travelers like G i d e b e c o m e i n v o l v e d in a j o u r n e y that o b l i t e r a t e s h i s t o r y as E u r o p e a n s c o n c e i v e it, a j o u r n e y i n w h i c h , w h i l e " t r a v e l l i n g b a c k t o t h e e a r l i e s t b e g i n n i n g s o f t h e w o r l d " ( C o n r a d 66), they are simultaneously "sucked . . . into the continent's m a w " ( H y l a n d 13). T h e t e m p o r a l " o t h e r n e s s " o f t h e C o n g o a c t s i n t a n d e m w i t h its spatial " o t h e r n e s s , " impressing itself u p o n t h e prospective traveler w i t h a p o w e r g r e a t e r t h a n m o t i v a t i o n — w i t h n o t h i n g less, it a p p e a r s , t h a n the inexorable force o f fate. T h u s , the n i n e - y e a r - o l d C o n r a d , p o r i n g o v e r a m a p o f " d a r k e s t " A f r i c a , a n d " p u t t i n g [his] finger o n t h e b l a n k space representing the u n s o l v e d m y s t e r y o f that continent, . . . said t o [him]self w i t h absolute assurance a n d a n a m a z i n g a u d a c i t y . . . ' W h e n I g r o w u p I s h a l l g o there'" ( q t d . i n H y l a n d 21), j u s t a s G i d e r e m a r k s o f h i s j o u r n e y , " I h a d n o t s o m u c h w i l l e d i t . . . a s h a d it i m p o s e d u p o n m e b y a s o r t o f i n e l u c t a b l e f a t a l i t y " (4). T h i s a t a v i s t i c c a l l n o t o n l y d r a i n s t h e p o w e r o f t h o s e w h o h e a r it; i t a l s o b u r d e n s t h e m w i t h a metaphysical l o a d . C o n t e m p o r a r y narratives b y writers like H y l a n d , N a i p a u l , a n d S h o u m a t o f f h a r k b a c k t o this p a t t e r n , reinscribing C o n r a d ' s z o n e i n different w a y s . W i t h i n t h e zone, history disappears; t h e landscape b e c o m e s sinisterly p r i m e v a l ; h u m a n figures b e c o m e either h y p e r s e n sual o r abject; politics b e c o m e s a n a r c h y ; n o n c o n t i n u o u s p h e n o m e n a are sucked into a n "essential" stigmatized center. T r a v e l into t h e C o n g o disfigures, b e c o m e s a f o r m o f d y s t o p i c transgression. B y f o r e g r o u n d i n g p e r s o n a l sensitivity, a c c o u n t s such as H y l a n d ' s The Black Heart s e e k , h o w e v e r , t o m i t i g a t e t h e s e n s e o f radical " o t h e r n e s s " that decades o f travel n a r r a t i v e s have stamped o n t h e C o n g o . A c c o r d i n g t o this f o r m u l a , H y l a n d represents himself
/11
11 n 1 K I M , W I T H
1 \ I-I w M ' j I 1
as altered: he is the alienated one, the "other"; m o d e r n m a n in search o f a soul, in search o f h o m e . A l t h o u g h H y l a n d sees himself as the "inheritor o f S t a n l e y ' s self-glorifying vision o f the D a r k C o n t i n e n t , o f Joseph C o n r a d ' s a m b i g u o u s and anachronistic c h r o n i c l e " (22), his ultimate destination is a mission station, far upriver even from C o n rad's Inner Station, f o u n d e d b y his great-uncle D a n C r a w f o r d on the shore o f L a k e M w e r u at L u a n z a . W h e n he arrives there, a villager greets him: " E e h B w a n a , Bibi, y o u h a v e c o m e home. T h i s is y o u r vil l a g e " (243). Y e t even while the narrative situates the L u a n z a mission as an alternative reality (an " o t h e r " heart) to C o n r a d ' s Inner Station and affirms H y l a n d ' s inheritance there, it is not quite " h o m e . " Selfc o n s c i o u s m o d e r n angst plays between the senses o f provisionality and nostalgia: Can you run away from home? Escape can feel like homecoming, love and success like death. Travel is gloriously promiscuous: the shifting destination, arrival again and again, the unknown possessed, the quest for an illusory home. So I may have travelled light with a heavy heart. The quest for a cure. I'm in the air, unearthed like Antaeus, needing to make touch. (211) T h e perplexing ambivalence o f this passage suffuses The Black Heart, poising H y l a n d between the figures o f doubtful quester and mission ary-inheritor. A t L u a n z a , H y l a n d plays the latter role, participating in the work o f building and repairing the mission station, while his wife Nocllc shares in the lives o f the w o m e n teachers, nurses, housekeepers, and children. R e c o u n t i n g the life o f D a n C r a w f o r d , C r a w f o r d ' s wife, and the mission's history, H y l a n d adopts something o f the authority o f I he heroic male missionary, producing a framed narrative that installs order, progress, and traditional Western paradigms in Africa. Describ ing a mission that his brother-in-law once administered, Hyland becomes proprietary. He w a l k s past "the orange grove Peter had planned," where "Peter's water-tank still stood high," and notes that an African m a n "had served as a corporal in the F o r c e Publique for six years before Peter, 'Petrus' he called him, t o o k him on to w o r k " (89). T h e link between missionary consecration and appropriation is comi cally posed when the Hylands, arriving in Zaire, "[lay] hands on the surface o f A f r i c a " (13; emphasis added). Seen in this context. The Black Heart affirms the very mythology it wishes to reject:. Hyland wishes Mini "all while nivlhs and histories for
/i>NI".
/1
w h i c h t h e p e o p l e h a v e n o u s e s h o u l d v a n i s h , as i f f l u s h e d a w a y b y t h e rains"
Y e t his mission m o v e s i n the w a k e o f S t a n l e y , w h o
(136).
a r r i v e d b e f o r e t h e m o u t h o f t h e r i v e r t o a s c e n d it, [ t o s o w ] a l o n g i t s b a n k s c i v i l i s e d s e t t l e m e n t s , t o p e a c e f u l l y c o n q u e r a n d s u b d u e it, t o remould
it i n h a r m o n y
with modern
ideas into
within w h o s e limits the E u r o p e a n m e r c h a n t
National
States,
shall g o h a n d in
hand
w i t h the dark A f r i c a n trader, a n d justice and l a w a n d order shall pre vail, a n d m u r d e r and lawlessness a n d the cruel barter o f slaves shall f o r e v e r c e a s e . (28-29)
W h i l e H y l a n d glancingly critiques the ideal o f the nation-state, he nev ertheless casually d r a w s f r o m t h e s t e r e o t y p e reservoir t h a t w r i t e r s f r o m Stanley t o V . S. N a i p a u l h a v e i n v o k e d — o n e in w h i c h , for e x a m p l e , the t r a v e l e r c a n feel " a t o n c e , t h e d e p t h o f t h i s s o i l , t h e d e p t h o f t h o s e e y e s , t h e h i s t o r y i n t h e b l o o d " (124); c a n o b s e r v e s o m e o n e p r a c t i c i n g " t h e A f r i c a n a r t o f b l a n k n e s s " (50); a n d c a n a t t r i b u t e t o a c o l o n i a l b u i l d i n g a n " A f r i c a n s o u l " (54). L i k e w i s e , H y l a n d essentializes the A f r i c a n s he describes, p o r t r a y i n g t h e m as e i t h e r m y s t e r i o u s l y s e n s u a l o r e x t r e m e l y a b j e c t . T h r e e y o u n g w o m e n c a v o r t i n g b y the ocean, d o i n g a " n a i v e , self-conscious s t r i p - t e a s e , " stir h i m f a v o r a b l y : o n e " d a n c e d a s h a p e l y d a n c e t o t h e waves in a white b r a a n d green p a n t s , " a second "wriggled w i t h p l u m p breasts held h i g h , . . . p i n k d r a w e r s clinging d a r k l y t o p r o u d b u t t o c k s , " w h i l e a t h i r d w a s " a b u d d i n g t w i g o f a g i r l i n w h i t e p a n t s " (39). O n t h e other h a n d , a m a n w h o " h a u n t s " h i m "fell a b o u t , raving, . . . wearing t a t t e r s o f c l o t h , f i l t h y m u l t i - c o l o u r e d b a n d s o n a r m s a n d legs, w i d e e y e s s t a r i n g t h r o u g h glassless w e l d e r ' s g o g g l e s , l o s t s o m e w h e r e b e t w e e n i n i 4
t i a t i o n i n t h e f o r e s t a n d t w e n t i e t h - c e n t u r y Z a i r e " (194). W h e n H y l a n d finally
arrives at the d e m o n i c center, t h e I n n e r S t a t i o n w h e r e K u r t z
once reigned supreme, he has a vision o f C o n r a d ' s gorgeous phantas mal woman: I saw K u r t z ' s familiars and, w i t h M a r l o w ' s eyes, the w o m a n , " s a v a g e and
superb,
wild-eyed and
magnificent,"
bedecked
with
fetishes,
gleaming with ivory, a g l o w with brass, w h o s e arms flung s k y w a r d s , w h o s e s h a d o w m o v e d o n earth and river and gathered the steamer into her embrace.
But
tin-pot
(203)
soon, he conjures a fallen descendant o f that
figure,
another
"essential" A f r i c a n w o m a n w h o b u r s t f r o m t h eh o s p i t a l gates w i t h h e r a r m s f l u n g h i g h , w a l k i n g in a trance,
wailing
an extraordinary
T O d H I N T S
tune,
W I T H
strong
a n d plaintive,
TYI'tiWHITIHtlt
an
e x a l t e d dirge, her spirit straining after the spirit o f the d e a d . S o m e t i m e s I c a n a l m o s t r e c a l l t h e fierce q u a l i t y o f t h a t s o u n d . it s e e m s l i k e t h e a n t h e m o f A f r i c a .
Sometimes
(227)
I t is w i t h p o r t e n t o u s s y m b o l i s m l i k e t h i s t h a t t r a v e l e r - w r i t e r s i n t h e C o n g o offer glimpses into the heart o f the deadly " A f r i c a n " z o n e . I f V . S. N a i p a u l ' s incursions into the C o n g o — " t h e h o t z o n e " — a r e b o t h less f a n c i f u l a n d m o r e l i t e r a r y - m i n d e d t h a n H y l a n d ' s , t h e y a r e a l s o w i t h o u t t h e l a t t e r ' s a m b i v a l e n c e . I n t h e n o v e l A Bend in the River (1979), a n d i n t h e " N e w J o u r n a l i s m " pieces r e p u b l i s h e d as The
Return
of Eva Peron (1980), N a i p a u l c l a i m s t o w r i t e i n t h e s p i r i t o f a C o n r a d p o r t r a y i n g t h e disintegration o f the colonial w o r l d . F e e l i n g that his o w n i n h e r i t a n c e is a " m i x e d , " " s e c o n d - h a n d , " a n d " r e s t r i c t e d " w o r l d , N a i p a u l first a c c o u n t s f o r t h e C a r i b b e a n e x - c o l o n i e s i n t h o s e t e r m s , then proceeds t o i n v o k e them again t o analyze decolonization in other 5
p a r t s o f t h e T h i r d W o r l d . T h u s i t is, i n A f r i c a , t h a t h e feels t h e g r o u n d m o v e b e n e a t h me. T h e n e w politics, the c u r i o u s reliance o n m e n a n d institutions they were yet w o r k i n g to undermine, the sim plicity o f beliefs, and the h i d e o u s simplicity o f actions, the
corrup
tions o f causes, half-made societies that seemed to remain half-made: these w e r e the things that b e g a n to p r e o c c u p y me. . . . I f o u n d C o n r a d had been everywhere before me.
that
(Return 207-8).
W h e n h e v i s i t s Z a i r e , t h e n , N a i p a u l t r e a d s i n t h e steps o f C o n r a d , b u t w i t h a r e v e r s a l i n m i n d . W h e r e c o r r u p t i o n i n Heart of Darkness is r e p resented b y a E u r o p e a n , in N a i p a u l ' s " A N e w K i n g f o r t h e C o n g o : M o b u t u a n d t h e N i h i l i s m o f A f r i c a " it is m a n i f e s t e d i n b l a c k A f r i c a n s , c r a z e d b y c i v i l i z a t i o n . R o b N i x o n ' s c o m m e n t , " W h e n t h e w o r d primi tive o c c u r s i n [ N a i p a u l ' s ] t r a v e l w r i t i n g s , it d o e s s o , n o t i n t h e c o n t e x t o f a l a s t - g a s p r o m a n t i c d e s i r e t o s a l v a g e a p u r e r p a s t , b u t as a s t r a i g h t f o r w a r d t e r m o f a b u s e " (London Calling 54-55), is c e r t a i n l y a p p r o p r i ate f o r N a i p a u l ' s A f r i c a n essays a n d n o v e l . N a i p a u l r e p l a c e s C o n r a d ' s c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n o f t h e C o n g o as m y s teriously savage w i t h a simplistic analysis o f neocolonial d e r a n g e m e n t . T a u g h t t o m i m i c their civilized colonial masters, N a i p a u l ' s A f r i c a n s h a v e b e c o m e c a r i c a t u r e s , f i g u r e s o f f u n , y e t s t r a n g e l y sinister. W h a t C o n r a d h a d o n c e r e a d as n e b u l o u s a n d i n a c c e s s i b l e , N a i p a u l r e a d s as the c o n f u s i o n , b e w i l d e r m e n t , a n d r e s e n t m e n t o f " p r i m i t i v e "
people
w h o h a v e been r e m o v e d f r o m the bush then offered the b l a n d i s h m e n t s o f a civilization they are incapable o f attaining. T h e i r resentments " c a n at a n y t i m e b e c o n v e r t e d i n t o a w i s h t o w i p e o u t a n d u n d o , a n A f r i c a n
/ . O N its
yi
n i h i l i s m , t h e r a g e o f p r i m i t i v e m e n " (Return 187). N a i p a u l p r o c e e d s t o n a t u r a l i z e this " p r i m i t i v e n e s s " w i t h i n a drastically simple historical f r a m e : i n " A N e w K i n g , " f o r e x a m p l e , h i s t o r y is c o n s t r u e d a s a b r i e f interval b e t w e e n a n " A f r i c a o f the ancestors" a n d a n e w " m i m i c " civi l i z a t i o n (169). B e t w e e n t h e s e t w o is a c o l o n i a l w o r l d w h o s e p a s s i n g N a i p a u l n o w regrets, as h e deplores h o w " t h e B e l g i a n past recedes a n d is m a d e t o l o o k a s s h a b b y as its d e f a c e d m o n u m e n t s . " T h a t " t h e s t a t u e o f Stanley that o v e r l o o k e d the rapids has been replaced b y the statue o f a t a l l a n o n y m o u s t r i b e s m a n w i t h a s p e a r " is p a r t , f o r h i m , o f t h e silli ness o f n e w Z a i r e — t h e s a m e silliness t h a t l e d t h e d e c o l o n i z i n g state t o c h o o s e f o r i t s e l f a " n o n s e n s e " n a m e , a n d its p r e s i d e n t t o reject J o s e p h M o b u t u f o r t h e ludicrously grandiose " M o b u t u Seso Seke K u k u N g b e n d u W a Z a B a n g a " (167). N a i p a u l ' s c o m m e n t a r y o n Z a i r e d e s c r i b e s t h e s a m e p h e n o m e n a as a m u l t i t u d e o f c o n t e m p o r a r y A f r i c a n a c c o u n t s : i m p o v e r i s h e d , d e g r a d e d cities; a c h a n g e l e s s l a n d scape; grotesque people; g o v e r n m e n t ostentation a n d c o r r u p t i o n . T h e list s t r e t c h e s o n a n d o n . W h a t m a k e s N a i p a u l ' s v e r s i o n s t r i k i n g is its extreme c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n o f t h e C o n g o as a n o v e r h e a t e d z o n e , a H e a r t o f N o t h i n g n e s s d o o m e d t o d r a g itself b a c k into t h e v a c a n c y o f b u s h a n d ancestors: T o arrive at this sense o f a c o u n t r y t r a p p e d a n d static, eternally v u l nerable, is t o begin t o h a v e s o m e t h i n g o f the A f r i c a n sense o f t h e v o i d . I t is t o begin t o fall, i n the A f r i c a n w a y , into a d r e a m o f t h e p a s t — t h e v a c a n c y o f river a n d forest, the h u t in the b r o w n y a r d , t h e d u g o u t — w h e n the d e a d ancestors w a t c h e d a n d protected, a n d t h e enemies were o n l y m e n . (196) I n t h e passage, typically, N a i p a u l ' s chosen adjectives—"trapped," "static," " v u l n e r a b l e " — d e n o t e a collective p s y c h o l o g y i m m u n e t o the Western rational mind. I n m o r e recent C o n g o narratives, t h e d a r k fascination w i t h t h e " h o t z o n e " h a s escalated once again w i t h t h e e m e r g i n g scandal o f A I D S . F o r D a v i d W i l l s , f o r i n s t a n c e , t h e A I D S crisis r e p r e s e n t s " t h e w h o l e m y t h o l o g y a l l o v e r a g a i n o f a m o n k e y o n a h o t c o n t i n e n t " (91): It is i n a neglected A f r i c a once again that a n obsolete t e c h n o l o g y m e a n s d e a d bodies b y t h e t h o u s a n d s , t h e threat o f millions that w o u l d likely h a v e m e as dead as y o u were I o n e o f t h e m , f o r some strange reason they just keep o n d y i n g there in wholesale quantities o f causes as o l d as b a d water a n d as n e w as A I D S , while the f i r s t W o r l d disingenuously searches f o r the software glitch thill: limit he
I
H M I H I K T H Wl'l M I V I ' K W H I I "
causing it all, so A f r i c a c o m e s b a c k t o h a n g o n o u r necks, the w e i g h t and m o v e m e n t o f it has y o u d i z z y , it is A f r i c a y o u balance o n y o u r h e a d (91). I n Wills's account, the association between A f r i c a a n d A I D S h a s upped the ante b e y o n d C o n r a d ' s dark imperial metaphysics, H y l a n d ' s m y s t e r y , guilt, a n d sentimentality, a n d N a i p a u l ' s essential a t a v i s m , t o reach the all-encompassing hysteria o f deathly "systemic d y s f u n c t i o n . " I n African Madness (1988), A l e x S h o u m a t o f f a l s o r e c o r d s a j o u r ney into the d a r k heart o f A I D S . S h o u m a t o f f does n o t present himself i n a g l a m o r o u s l i g h t : h e is a p r o f e s s i o n a l j o u r n a l i s t w i t h a l i k i n g f o r t r o p i c a l r e g i o n s , a l w a y s o n t h e s c e n t f o r stories t o b e t r a c k e d d o w n i n A f r i c a a n d S o u t h A m e r i c a . S h o u m a t o f f writes a direct, c o n v e n t i o n a l , and unpretentious prose, f r o m a n A m e r i c a n liberal point o f view, w i t h s o m e resistance t o A m e r i c a n h e g e m o n y a n d m i n i m a l a n i m u s t o w a r d t h e A f r i c a n c o u n t r i e s h e visits. N e v e r t h e l e s s , h e d o e s n o t r e a l l y c h a l lenge the f o u n d a t i o n a l m y t h s a b o u t " d a r k e s t " A f r i c a that h a v e p r o v e d i n d i s p e n s a b l e t o g e n e r a t i o n s o f t r a v e l e r - w r i t e r s . N o r c a n h e resist t h e t e m p t a t i o n t o t r a n s f o r m a scientific investigative c o n c e r n t o locate t h e s o u r c e o f t h e A I D S v i r u s i n t o a p r o c e s s a c t i v e l y s y m b o l i z i n g it as " t h e A f r i c a n disease"; a n d h e seems repeatedly surprised that professional researchers h a v e n o t shared his mission o f " t r a c k i n g d o w n the source." 6
" H o w c u r i o u s it w o u l d b e , " m u s e s S h o u m a t o f f , " i f t h e s o u r c e o f the N i l e arid the source o f A I D S p r o v e t o b e o n e a n d the same, the vast t e e m i n g l a k e d e e p i n t h e d a n g e r o u s h e a r t o f d a r k e s t A f r i c a " (133). A m o r e economical f o r m u l a t i o n j o i n i n g the traveler's personal quest t o the c o n v e n t i o n a l r o m a n c e a n d h o r r o r o f A f r i c a (searches f o r the source of the Nile, the R i d e r H a g g a r d romances o f the M o u n t a i n s o f the M o o n , a n d so o n ) can hardly be imagined. A n d a l t h o u g h S h o u m a t o f f t e n d s t o q u e s t i o n m y t h s a b o u t A f r i c a a n d A I D S , h e still f o r e g r o u n d s the m y t h - l a d e n impulse b e h i n d his trip: "despite there being evidence o f A I D S as e a r l y a s 1972 i n n o r t h w e s t e r n U g a n d a , i n t h e N i l e p r o v i n c e , Idi A m i n ' s h o m e l a n d , . . . a t s o m e level, p e r h a p s o n l y m y t h i c a l , K a n s e w e r o is t h e f o n t o f A I D S " (132). I n S h o u m a t o f f s s e a r c h f o r t h e source, A f r i c a becomes a portent o f apocalypse, a promise o f horrors that will i n v a d e the W e s t in a parody-reversal o f the E u r o p e a n colonial m i s s i o n i n A f r i c a : " [ M a n y scientists] c l a i m t h a t w h a t is h a p p e n i n g i n A f r i c a is a n i g h t m a r e v i s i o n o f t h e f u t u r e o f t h e W e s t " (134-35). S e v e r a l o f S h o i m i a t o f P s interviewees, t o o , "believed that the curtain w a s f a l l i n g , l h a t t h e f l o o d w a s c o m i n g . . . . A I D S w a s t h e hist s t r a w , t h e
,m>NIK«
•»«
final flail. I t p l a y e d right i n t o t h e g a t h e r i n g m i l l e n a r i a n t e r r o r " (170). S h o u m a t o f f displays a skeptical irony that holds his account b a c k f r o m p r o m o t i n g w i l d e r m i l l e n a r i a n i s m . H e is r e a d y t o a c k n o w l e d g e i g n o r a n c e a n d d o u b t , t o pass o n q u i p s that m i g h t easily u n d e r m i n e his project, a n d t o report personal encounters w i t h o u t condescension. H e asks, f o r e x a m p l e , "[I]s the clinical picture o f A I D S really A f r i c a n ? " (140), r e p o r t s a c o l l e a g u e ' s c o m m e n t , " I t ' s f u n n y h o w t h e y a l w a y s s a y it's u s . . . . F i r s t i t ' s t h e A f r i c a n k i l l e r b e e s . N o w i t ' s A I D S " (180), a n d q u o t e s a m e d i c a l officer w h o , w h e n a s k e d a b o u t a n A f r i c a - t o - H a i t i - t o A m e r i c a r o u t e , " replied, " [ W ] h y c o u l d n ' t it h a v e b e e n t h e o t h e r w a y a r o u n d ? " (163). U l t i m a t e l y , t h o u g h , S h o u m a t o f f s a c c o u n t d o e s l i t t l e to shake u p the established m y t h s a n d symbolic patterns that h a v e long since m a r k e d t h e C o n g o a s a d i s t i n c t d i s c u r s i v e z o n e . T h u s , h e l i n k s A f r i c a n A I D S historically which
populations
with the maelstrom o f decolonization, in
"mushroom,"
"upheaval"
occurs,
and
H I V
" s w e e p s " f r o m its " h i d i n g p l a c e " (139). M o r a l l y , h e l o c a t e s t h e v i r u s i n " d e g e n e r a t e " scenes l i k e t h e b a r i n U g a n d a w h e r e , a h o r r i f i e d s p e c t a t o r , h e w i t n e s s e s " t h e c l o s e s t t h i n g t o S o d o m " (195). A n d
finally,
as i f
to c o n f i r m t h a t A f r i c a n p h e n o m e n a a l w a y s exist i n a " n a t u r a l , " dehistoricized z o n e rather than a cultural a n d political one, he evokes the specter o f A I D S i n a n a n o d y n e d o m e s t i c allegory: A c o l o n y o f m a g n i f i c e n t . . . egrets h a d t a k e n o v e r a h u g e tree a b o v e [a b u n g a l o w ] a n d the r o o f a n d y a r d were spattered w i t h their g o o e y w h i t e d r o p p i n g s . T h e o w n e r seemed t o be l i v i n g w i t h the situation, t o be m a k i n g n o effort t o d r i v e t h e birds a w a y . Il was a case study in tropical acceptance. (145; e m p h a s i s a d d e d ) I n scenes s u c h as t h i s o n e , S h o u m a t o f f c o n f i r m s t h e m y t h i c i z e d C o n g o o f C o n r a d , N a i p a u l , a n d H y l a n d . T h e C o n g o r e e m e r g e s as t h e t r o p i c a l z o n e o f s a d inevitability,
the terminus—the
endzone—of
extreme,
death-driven abjection.
THE
AMAZON
T h e A m a z o n , like the C o n g o , has a m y t h i c i z e d history o f abjection, a legacy
o f remorse—"tristes
tropiques"—that
anticipates
its o w n
7
d e s t r u c t i o n . B e f o r e r e c e n t y e a r s , h o w e v e r , w h e n it h a s b e c o m e t h e p r e e m i n e n t z o n e o f the sensitive e n v i r o n m e n t a n d threatened i n d i g e n o u s cultures,
the A m a z o n
ground
f o r the "tropical traveler": the adventurer-hero or, perhaps
/it
w a s also a ludic
space—a happy
l o n i n s 1 \ w i 111 I V I ' l f W H I i 11
hunting
better, the w o u l d - b e hero o f the g u n g h o type m o s t p o p u l a r l y expressed in the B o y ' s O w n a d v e n t u r e tale. T h i s tradition, primarily t h o u g h b y n o means exclusively British ( t h e l e a d i n g " f o r e i g n p r e t e n d e r " is p r o b a b l y t h e A m e r i c a n T i m C a h i l l ) , has been kept alive m o s t conspicuously b y the traveler-natu ralist R e d m o n d O ' H a n l o n . T h e genre w i t h i n w h i c h O ' H a n l o n writes, like the tradition h e s t u b b o r n l y u p h o l d s , has thrived o n turning out d o o r danger into a r m c h a i r c o m e d y . O n e o f the genre's " o l d h a n d s , " P e t e r F l e m i n g , n e a t l y d e m o n s t r a t e s its a w a r e n e s s o f its o w n c l i c h e s : 8
T h e w h o l e t e c h n i q u e o f e x p l o r i n g [in the tropics] is o v e r l a i d w i t h c o n v e n t i o n s so u n m i s t a k e a b l e a n d so o f t e n m o c k e d — h a s a j a r g o n so impressive a n d so easily g u y e d — t h a t the m a n w h o at his first essay a d o p t s t h e c o n v e n t i o n s a n d e m p l o y s t h e j a r g o n m u s t lack b o t h s h a m e a n d h u m o u r . (122) F l e m i n g , w h o s e 1 9 3 3 t r a v e l b o o k Brazilian Adventure is a classic o f its k i n d , a p p a r e n t l y lacks neither: his o w n experiences in the jungle, h e a d m i t s self-ironically, w e r e " a l w a y s perillously close t o t h e pages o f those b o o k s w h i c h publishers catalogue u n d e r the heading o f T r a v e l and A d v e n t u r e ' " ( 1 2 2 ) — p r e c i s e l y the b o o k s that that other wellk n o w n tropical traveler, C l a u d e Levi-Strauss, derides, in w h i c h "actual e x p e r i e n c e is r e p l a c e d b y s t e r e o t y p e s , " a n d i n w h i c h " p l a t i t u d e s a n d c o m m o n p l a c e s [are] t r a n s m u t e d i n t o r e v e l a t i o n s b y t h e sole fact t h a t their a u t h o r , instead o f d o i n g his plagiarizing at h o m e , h a s . . . s a n c t i f i e d it b y c o v e r i n g t w e n t y t h o u s a n d m i l e s " (Tristes Tropiques 3 9 , 1 8 ) . "I hate traveling a n d explorers," are the f a m o u s o p e n i n g w o r d s o f Tristes Tropiques ( 1 9 5 5 ) ; " y e t h e r e I a m p r o p o s i n g t o tell t h e s t o r y o f m y e x p e d i t i o n s " (17). " A d v e n t u r e is o b s o l e t e , " d e c l a i m s F l e m i n g , t h e n proceeds t o regale us w i t h his adventures ( 3 1 ) . I t appears the tropical t r a v e l o g u e needs t o disclaim itself i n o r d e r t o b r i n g itself into b e i n g . D r a w n i n s p i t e o f i t s e l f t o c l i c h e , t h e g e n r e is a l s o i r r e s i s t i b l y a t t r a c t e d to p a r o d y . M o r e than just attracted; for in the danger-ridden jungles o f Brazil, p a r o d y provides b o t h the a m a t e u r explorer ( F l e m i n g ) a n d t h e p r o f e s s i o n a l a n t h r o p o l o g i s t ( L e v i - S t r a u s s ) w i t h n o t h i n g less t h a n a strategy o f s u r v i v a l . P a r o d y f u n c t i o n s as p r o t e c t i v e c o v e r i n g , as c a m o u f l a g e ; it c o n s t i t u t e s a n e c e s s a r y a c t o f s e l f - d e f e n s e . H e r e , a g a i n , f r o m Brazilian Adventure: II' I n d i a n s a p p r o a c h e d us, w c referred to t h e m as the O n c o m i n g S a v never said, " w a s thai 11 s h o t ? " b u t a l w a y s , " w a s that the
ages. W e
w e l l - k n o w n b a r k o f a M a u s e r ? " A l l insects o f a harmless n a t u r e a n d ridiculous a p p e a r a n c e w e p o i n t e d o u t t o each o t h e r as creatures " w h o s e slightest glance spelt D e a t h . " A n y b i r d larger t h a n a t h r u s h w e credited w i t h the a b i l i t y t o " b r e a k a m a n ' s a r m w i t h a single b l o w o f its p o w e r f u l w i n g . " W e s p o k e o f w a t e r a l w a y s as the " P r e c i o u s F l u i d . " W e referred t o ourselves, n o t as e a t i n g meals, b u t as d o i n g " A m p l e Justice t o a F r u g a l R e p a s t . " ( T 2 2 ) A n d so the s h o w c o n t i n u e s . " T o a n y o n e w h o did n o t t h i n k it f u n n y as w e d i d , " concedes F l e m i n g , "it must have been an intolerably tiresome k i n d o f j o k e " (122). B u t t h e j o k e a l s o s e r v e s i t s p u r p o s e , b e c o m i n g , f o r F l e m i n g , " a n important feature in that private code o f nonsense which w a s o u r c h i e f d e f e n c e a g a i n s t h o s t i l e c i r c u m s t a n c e " (122). T w o options a p p e a r t o be o p e n here t o aspiring tropical travelers: either they can strike u p a pose o f m o r a l rectitude, t h e r e b y
allowing
t h e m s e l v e s t o i n t e r p r e t their e x p e r i e n c e as a p a r a b l e o f e c o l o g i c a l d e v astation a n d / o r civilizational decline (the L e v i - S t r a u s s m o d e l ) ; o r they can p l a y o u t p a r o d y t o the full, t r a n s f o r m i n g their experience into the stuff o f high m e l o d r a m a (the F l e m i n g m o d e l ) . Several c o n t e m p o r a r y A m a z o n t r a v e l b o o k s — m o s t n o t a b l y t h o s e o f J o e K a n e (Running the Amazon,
Savages)—succeed
with
i n c o m b i n i n g these t w o m o d e l s . O t h
ers, s u c h a s P e t e r M a t t h i e s s e n ' s The Cloud
Forest (1961) o r , m o r e
r e c e n t l y , B r i a n A l e x a n d e r ' s Green Cathedrals: A Wayward Traveler in the Rain Forest (1995) a r e b e t t e r s e e n as m o r a l i s t i c " e c o t r a v e l o g u e s " i n c o n t e m p l a t i v e L e v i - S t r a u s s i a n v e i n . A n d still o t h e r s a r e e t h n o g r a p h i c studies, p o p u l a r i z e d f o r a w i d e r audience: e x a m p l e s here m i g h t include Alan
Campbell's
Getting
to Know
Waiwai
(1995) a n d P h i l i p p e
D e s c o l a ' s r e c e n t l y r e i s s u e d The Spears of Twilight (1996). T h e s e b o o k s , a n d m a n y others like t h e m , a d d themselves t o the steady f l o w o f " r a i n forest" products that h a v e transformed the vivid colors o f the A m a z o n into a swathe o f political green. Y e t w o r k s like O ' H a n l o n ' s
indicate
t h a t t h e z o n e o f t r o p i c a l c o m e d y is f a r f r o m e m p t y , a n d t h a t i t o c c u p i e s a residual space b e n e a t h even the m o s t serious accounts. T h e p o p u l a r i t y o f O ' H a n l o n ' s b o o k s o w e s m u c h t o t h e i r use o f k n o c k a b o u t farce a n d j u v e n i l e h u m o r t o offset their scientific ratio nale: the observation o f local flora a n d f a u n a . I n his tropical travel o g u e s t o d a t e , Into the Heart of Borneo (1984) a n d In Trouble
Again
(1988) ( t h e m o s t r e c e n t , Congo Journey [1996], is r a t h e r d i f f e r e n t , b e i n g m u c h m o r e "serious" a n d introspective), O ' H a n l o n combines D a r w i n ian science w i t h a k e e n sense o f t h e theatrical: his n a m * lives, like his p r e d e c e s s o r F l e m i n g ' s , a r e e x u b e r a n t b u r l e s q u e s , 11
r u n in-, i s W I I I I
1
1 \ i'i W I M 1 1
antics served u p in a " r a c y " l a n g u a g e a n d spiced w i t h " n a u g h t y " jokes. T h e B e n n y H i l l o f the tropics, O ' H a n l o n careens a r o u n d the rain forests o f B o r n e o a n d B r a z i l w i t h a n a l m o s t d e m e n t e d e n t h u s i a s m , tak i n g as m u c h p l e a s u r e i n l e e r i n g a t t h e l o c a l ( f e m a l e ) t a l e n t as h e d o e s i n sighting the latest rare a n i m a l o r b i r d . " I h a v e d e c i d e d , " says O ' H a n lon's sidekick in B o r n e o , t h e poet J a m e s F e n t o n (himself a travel w r i t e r ) , " t h a t t h e h u n t f o r o r n i t h o l o g i c a l r a r i t i e s is e s s e n t i a l l y f r i v o l o u s " (Borneo 143). S o i t p r o v e s , t o o , i n B r a z i l ; b u t t h e m o r e O ' H a n lon's c o m p a n i o n s rave a n d bluster a b o u t their u n c o m f o r t a b l e living c o n d i t i o n s , a b o u t the a b s u r d risks t h e y are t a k i n g , a b o u t the sheer stu pidity o f the exercise, t h e m o r e O ' H a n l o n enjoys himself, c o m f o r t e d t h a t t h e p e o p l e a r o u n d h i m a r e as u n b e a r a b l e as h i m s e l f . O ' H a n l o n ' s o u t r a g e o u s n e s s is, o f c o u r s e , a classic t r a v e l w r i t e r ' s posture; b y acting the b u f f o o n , he protects himself f r o m further h a r m (see c h a p . 1). W h i l e i n o n e s e n s e O ' H a n l o n is s u i g e n e r i s — t h e o d d e s t s p e c i e s i n t h e j u n g l e — i n a n o t h e r h e is f o l l o w i n g i n a t i m e - h o n o r e d t r a d i t i o n : t h a t o f t h e E u r o p e a n n a t u r a l i s t - e x p l o r e r . In Trouble Again begins w i t h a nalmost obligatory invocation o f H u m b o l d t , Bates, and W a l l a c e , O ' H a n l o n ' s h e r o e s , a n d t h r o u g h o u t h i s t r a v e l w r i t i n g lie does his u t m o s t t o keep their m e m o r y alive. I n so d o i n g , h e allows h i m s e l f t o b e s e e n — i n v i t e s o t h e r s t o see h i m — a s o u t o f d a t e : " Y o u live in t h e n i n e t e e n t h c e n t u r y , " F e n t o n a d m o n i s h e s h i m i n B o r n e o . " E v e r y t h i n g ' s changed a r o u n d y o u , although y o u d o n ' t appear to n o t i c e " (Borneo 34). O ' H a n l o n d o e s n o t i c e , b u t h e p r e t e n d s n o t t o ; f o r the willful a n a c h r o n i s m that permeates his travel writing p a r a d o x i c a l l y e n s u r e s its ( a n d h i s o w n ) s u r v i v a l . B y p r e s e n t i n g h i m s e l f as a l i v i n g fossil, a s u r v i v o r f r o m a n o t h e r age, O ' H a n l o n d u l y grants h i m s e l f t h e p r i v i l e g e s o f h i s f o r e b e a r s . F o r e x a m p l e , h i s d e s c r i p t i o n i n In Trou ble Again o f h i s b r i e f s t a y a m o n g t h e Y a n o m a m i I n d i a n s another A m a z o n i a n i c o n — d r a w s self-consciously o n evolutionary a n t h r o p o l o g y t o r e i n f o r c e t h e sense o f his o w n c u l t u r a l s u p e r i o r i t y . T h e o b s e r vation o f "native rituals" provides him, too, with a further o p p o r t u n i t y f o r v o y e u r i s m as, h o m i n g i n o n the Y a n o m a m i w o m e n , he details t h e m a r k i n g s o n t h e i r f l e s h . T h i s f e t i s h i z a t i o n o f t h e " n a t i v e b o d y " is o f f e n s i v e o n m a n y levels, b u t O ' H a n l o n seeks refuge b y t u r n i n g t h e s t e r e o t y p e s b a c k o n h i m s e l f . T h u s , in a m o v e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f t h i s t y p e o f p i c a r e s q u e t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e , h e o v e r t u r n s I he m o r e s o f his " c i v i l i z e d " s o c i e t y t o recast h i m s e l f as 11 b a r b a r i a n : " a h o r r i b l e n a k e d sav a g e " (In Trouble Again 194). N o n e l h e l c H M , w e l l u d h i m r e c u p e r a t i n g t h e m o r a l h i g h g r o u n d b y t h e c u d I n t h e f u n d p a r a g r a p h o f In 9
1 0
•
1
IN ,
/-/
Trouble Again, t h e u n e x p e c t e d d i s c o v e r y o f a t i n y b i r d ' s e g g a f f o r d s a wistful reminder o f the comforts o f h o m e : B e n e a t h the tropical sun o n T o u c a n Hill, ignorant, momentarily, like a Y a n o m a m i , o f the l a w s o f s c i e n c e , g a z i n g at t h a t little e g g , I m i g h t h a v e been l o o k i n g at one half o f an e m p t y eggshell, a message
of
b r o w n y - w h i t e , a p r e s e n t f r o m a mistle t h r u s h d r o p p e d at m y feet o n a Vicarage lawn.
(258)
B y a p p e a l i n g t o t h e t w i n discourses o f (positivist) science a n d ( H i g h C h u r c h ) religion, O ' H a n l o n reclaims a temporarily mislaid authority o v e r his " i g n o r a n t " i n d i g e n o u s subjects. B a s k i n g i n the k n o w l e d g e o f that authority, he allows himself a m o m e n t o f harmless distraction: t o associate the egg w i t h E n g l a n d m a y r u n c o u n t e r t o the rigorous laws o f W e s t e r n science—laws that the Y a n o m a m i , in their " p r i m i t i v e simplic ity," c a n n o t u n d e r s t a n d — b u t such instances o f fanciful nostalgia a r e o n l y t e m p o r a r y a b e r r a t i o n s ; t h e y a r e p e r m i s s i b l e , t h a t is, w i t h i n t h e context o f an expedition that reconfirms the tried-and-tested m e t h o d s o f the W e s t . In Trouble Again p r o v i d e s a s e q u e n c e o f s u c h a b e r r a t i o n s ; as i f i n defiance o f the i n c o n t r o v e r t i b l e logic o f W e s t e r n science, O ' H a n l o n ' s n a r r a t i v e h i g h l i g h t s t h e r i d i c u l o u s a n t i c s a n d w a y w a r d f a n t a s i e s o f its b l u n d e r i n g naturalist-hero. B u t f a r f r o m d i m i n i s h i n g his a u t h o r i t y , O ' H a n l o n ' s b u f f o o n e r y m e r e l y i n c r e a s e s it. S e c u r e i n t h e k n o w l e d g e o f his s o p h i s t i c a t i o n , O ' H a n l o n p e r m i t s h i m s e l f t h e l u x u r y o f p l a y i n g t h e f o o l . C h a r g i n g a b o u t the tropics w i t h his g r i n g o ' s m e d i c a l k i t a n d o u t d a t e d E u r o p e a n m a n u a l s , O ' H a n l o n sets h i m s e l f u p as a figure o f f u n ; b u t t h e l a s t l a u g h is o n u s , f o r h e a l s o k n o w s h i m s e l f t o b e a s e r i o u s sci entist. H o w e v e r eccentric his m e t h o d s , h o w e v e r o u t r a g e o u s his b e h a v i o r , O ' H a n l o n n e v e r loses s i g h t o f h i m s e l f a s a s c i e n t i s t ; n o r d o e s h e f o r g e t t h e privileges t h a t a c c r u e t o t h e W e s t e r n scientist i n t h e field. T h e w o n d e r s o f science p r o v i d e O ' H a n l o n w i t h a m o r e t h a n a d e q u a t e c o m p e n s a t i o n f o r the a g g r a v a t i o n s o f living in the jungle, instilling in h i m a fighting spirit t h a t a l l o w s h i m t o b o u n c e b a c k o f f the insults o f his " u n c o m p r e h e n d i n g " colleagues a n d r e t u r n , r e f r e s h e d , f o r m o r e . U s i n g the p o s e o f the "reckless a d v e n t u r e r in t h e t r o p i c s " as a c o v e r , O ' H a n l o n p r o c e e d s t o g o u n c h a s t e n e d a b o u t his s c i e n t i f i c b u s i n e s s . O ' H a n l o n succeeds i n t u r n i n g the stereotypical " b a d t r i p " ( F r a s e r ) i n t o a m u l t i f a c e t e d c o m e d y o f e r r o r s i n w h i c h t h e A m a z o n l e a f ures as a z o n e o f b e w i l d e r m e n t , b u t also o n e o f scientific e x p e r t i s e . T r a v e l b o o k s l i k e O ' l l a n l o n ' s o f f e r a r e m i n d e r t h a t the / o n e o f t h e ( A n i a / o n 11
1 0 U H H M •> w i i n
1
-i i'i
IIIII
1
i a n ) t r o p i c s h a s p r o v i d e d a f e r t i l e soil f o r t h e n o u r i s h i n g o f E u r o p e a n r o m a n t i c m y t h s . P e r s u a d i n g themselves that t h e tropics lends itself " n a t u r a l l y " t o h y p e r b o l e , self-styled " t r o p i c a l travelers" h a v e g i v e n free rein t o their c o n q u i s t a d o r i a l a m b i t i o n s a n d exoticist fantasies. Y e t i f t h e t r o p i c s c a n b e s e e n as a p l a y g r o u n d f o r t h e v o y e u r i s t i c E u r o p e a n i m a g i n a t i o n ( i n s e a r c h o f " w i l d n e s s " ) , it is a l s o a v a s t s a n c t u a r y f o r t h e naturalist ( i n search o f wildlife). P o i s e d b e t w e e n the fiction writer's desire t o i n v e n t n e w w o r l d s a n d t h e scientist's n e e d t o v e r i f y t h e k n o w n w o r l d , t r o p i c a l t r a v e l o g u e s s u c h as O ' H a n l o n ' s a d d t h e s u r v i v a l s k i l l s o f t h e s e a s o n e d t r a v e l e r — s k i l l s t h a t m a y t h e m s e l v e s b e seen as p a r t o f a r o m a n t i c m y t h — t o the k n o w l e d g e a n d expertise o f the professional naturalist. O ' H a n l o n ' s travel w r i t i n g thus m a k e s use o f the tropical z o n e t o recollect exotic ( m i s ) a d v e n t u r e , b u t also t o reinstate a u t h o r i t y in W e s t e r n s c i e n c e ' s n a m e . 12
ZONE
TWO:
THE
ORIENT
(JAPAN)
W h e r e a s " t h e t r o p i c s , " a s t r a v e l z o n e , is a n a r e a f r a u g h t w i t h v i r i l e d a n g e r , " t h e O r i e n t ' s " m y s t i q u e is o n e o f f e m i n i z e d s e x u a l a l l u r e . N o w h e r e m o r e s o t h a n i n J a p a n , figured i n m a n y m a l e e r o t i c f a n t a s i e s after the fashion o f the F r e n c h n a v a l officer Pierre L o t i w h o , arriving in N a g a s a k i f o r a f o u r - m o n t h v i s i t , s a w t h e c o u n t r y " o p e n e d t o o u r v i e w , t h r o u g h a f a i r y - t a l e r e n t , w h i c h t h u s a l l o w e d us t o p e n e t r a t e i n t o h e r v e r y h e a r t " ( 1 3 ) . S c h o o l b o o k s u s e d t o tell o f a n o t h e r a r r i v a l , C o m m o d o r e P e r r y ' s in T o k y o B a y , a n d o f his " o p e n i n g " o f J a p a n t o t h e A m e r i c a n a n d E u r o p e a n p o w e r s . I n L o t i ' s t e x t , t h e v e r b is u s e d i n t r a n sitively, indicating t h e e n c h a n t i n g disclosure o f s o m e t h i n g h i t h e r t o concealed, while the next verb, "penetrate," expands the m e t a p h o r w i t h suggestions o f possession a n d sexual conquest that are only implicit i n the historians' transitive f o r m o f " o p e n i n g . " T o g e t h e r , these m e t a p h o r s s u g g e s t a r a n g e o f s i g n i f i c a t i o n s f o r J a p a n as z o n e : m y s t e r i ous a n d e n c h a n t i n g , i n v i t i n g y e t resistant a n d , a b o v e all—like other " O r i e n t a l " z o n e s — f e m i n i n e . I n W e s t e r n representations, J a p a n has m o s t o f t e n figured as a n a l l u r i n g y e t e l u s i v e f e m i n i n e " o t h e r . " W r i t e r s h a v e generally eroticized the rituals a n d artifacts o f the c o n t a i n i n g cul t u r e , w h i l e f o c u s i n g t h e s e t h r o u g h a t t e m p t s t o l o c a t e a specific o t h e r i n fantasy a n d reality. B u t while " J a p a n e s e " icons like L o t i ' s M a d a m e C h r y s u n l h e m e a n d Puccini's M a d a m a Butterfly h a v e u n d e r g o n e sev eral i n c a r n a t i o n s , " J a p a n " i t s e l f ( h e r s e l f ? ) h a s p r o v e n s t u b b o r n l y resis-
1 ir 11
Kl
t a n t t o p e n e t r a t i o n . F r o m the early writings o f L o t i t o the later n a r r a tives o f P i c o I y e r , J o h n D a v i d M o r l e y , a n d R o l a n d B a r t h e s , t h e i m p r e s s i o n is o n e o f o b s e r v e r s w h o h a v e b a r e l y s c r a t c h e d t h e s u r f a c e . F r o m L o t i o n , t r a v e l e r s h a v e s e i z e d u p o n w h a t lies c l o s e s t t o t h e W e s t e r n p o p u l a r i m a g i n a r y t o c o n s t r u c t J a p a n as a z o n e : n a m e l y , r o m a n c e a n d e r o t i c i s m . ' L o t i , w h o s e Madame Chrysantheme pre sented a n early a n d influential image o f J a p a n , consistently exploited t h e e r o t i c p o t e n t i a l o f p r o f e s s i o n a l t r a v e l ; as a F r e n c h n a v a l o f f i c e r h e v i s i t e d a n d w r o t e a b o u t T a h i t i , S e n e g a l , a n d T u r k e y , as w e l l as J a p a n . ' I n N a g a s a k i , L o t i claimed t h e institutionalized privilege o f taking a t e m p o r a r y J a p a n e s e " w i f e , " C h r y s a n t h e m u m . I t is c o m m o n t o r e a d L o t i ' s b o o k r e t r o s p e c t i v e l y t h r o u g h t h e lens o f t h e P u c c i n i o p e r a it i n d i r e c t l y i n s p i r e d . B u t o t h e r m o t i f s o f Madame Chrysantheme o v e r s h a d o w the initial r o m a n t i c premise. L o t i ' s c o n d e s c e n d i n g friendship w i t h h i s j u n i o r s i d e k i c k Y v e s is u l t i m a t e l y m o r e s i g n i f i c a n t t h a n h i s a r r o g a n t m a t i n g w i t h C h r y s a n t h e m e ( K i k o u - S a n ) , w h i c h seems a l m o s t i m m e d i a t e l y i r k s o m e t o h i m . L o t i anticipates m a n y later writers in c o n s t i t u t i n g J a p a n a s a f e m i n i n e w o r l d , o b j e c t i f y i n g its w o m e n a n d r e d u c i n g its m e n , w h o r e s e m b l e " n o t h i n g s o m u c h as d a n c i n g m o n k e y s " (83). H e u n d e r c u t s h i s s u r f a c e c e l e b r a t i o n o f J a p a n as a l i b i d i n a l territory b y a c o n t i n u o u s process o f m i n i a t u r i z a t i o n in w h i c h J a p a n e s e w o m e n b e c o m e " l i t t l e N i p p o n e s e d o l l s " (74). I f , h e c o n c e d e s , " I r e a l l y m a k e a s a d a b u s e o f t h e a d j e c t i v e little," 3
4
I a m q u i t e a w a r e o f it, b u t h o w c a n I d o o t h e r w i s e ? I n d e s c r i b i n g t h i s c o u n t r y , t h e t e m p t a t i o n is t o o g r e a t t o u s e it t e n t i m e s i n e v e r y w r i t ten line. Little,
finical,
affected— all J a p a n is c o n t a i n e d , b o t h p h y s i
c a l l y a n d m o r a l l y , in these three w o r d s .
(242)
F a r f r o m b e i n g a n e x c e l l e n t g u i d e t o J a p a n t o d a y , as o n e r e c e n t e d i t o r characterizes h i m , ' L o t i shows t h r o u g h his constant belittling his inability t o engage with J a p a n — a people a n d culture with which " w e [ E u r o p e a n s ] h a v e a b s o l u t e l y n o t h i n g i n c o m m o n " (184). 5
W h i l e L o t i is t h e l i t e r a r y p r e c u r s o r o f m a n y s u b s e q u e n t c h r o n i c l e r s o f J a p a n , h e is b y n o m e a n s f o u n d a t i o n a l i n c o n s t r u c t i n g it a s a n imaginative zone. A craze for things Japanese was flourishing in E u r o p e a n c a p i t a l s d u r i n g t h e 1880s; w h a t L o t i o b s e r v e d w a s a l r e a d y f a m i l iar f r o m " t h e p a i n t i n g s o f l a c q u e r a n d p o r c e l a i n " he h a d seen at h o m e (42). L o t i ' s r e s p o n s e t o w h a t h e l a b e l s t h e J a p a n e s e " a r t o f d e c o r a t i o n " (327) a n d , o n a l a r g e r s c a l e , t o E u r o p e a n fin d e siecle d e c a d e n c e , is a m b i v a l e n t . W h i l e h e a n t i c i p a t e s R o l a n d B a r t h e s in j u d g i n g s o m e 1 6
•<'
TOURIMTa WITH TYtMtWUI lli>.
d e s i g n s h e sees t o b e " t h e r e v e l a t i o n o f a n u n k n o w n a r t , t h e s u b v e r s i o n o f a l l a c q u i r e d n o t i o n s o f f o r m " (186), o v e r a l l h e f i n d s t h e a r t t o b e " e n t i r e l y c o n v e n t i o n a l " (298), d e c o r a t i v e b u t c h e a p , t r i v i a l p r e c i s e l y i n its f e m i n i n i t y . L o t i ' s simple story o f W e s t e r n sailor d a l l y i n g w i t h the d e p e n d e n t affections o f Japanese m a i d e n was t o b e c o m e the p o w e r f u l archetype for a version o f Western Orientalism. Later Puccini, via J o h n L u t h e r L o n g a n d D a v i d B e l a s c o , raised it t o a n e v e n h i g h e r p i t c h i n his r o m a n tic o p e r a Madama Butterfly. P u c c i n i ' s o p e r a raises t h e stakes b y t r a n s f o r m i n g L o t i ' s generic W e s t e r n sailor into a successor t o C o m m o d o r e P e r r y , L i e u t e n a n t P i n k e r t o n o f the U . S . n a v y . A f f a i r s take a tragic t u r n : the y o u n g n a v a l officer takes an A m e r i c a n wife after a b a n d o n i n g his J a p a n e s e mistress C h o - C h o S a n , w h o s e s o n ( b y P i n k e r t o n ) b e a r s t h e m e l o d r a m a t i c n a m e o f S o r r o w . M o r e p o i g n a n t l y still, C h o C h o S a n , a l l h e r r o m a n t i c i l l u s i o n s d i s p e l l e d , t a k e s h e r o w n life. Madama Butterfly r e i n f o r c e s s o m e o f L o t i ' s p o w e r f u l s t e r e o t y p e s w i t h out i n v o k i n g L o t i ' s brutal m i s o g y n y a n d c o n t e m p t f o r Japanese cul t u r e . B u t a s f a r a s c u l t u r a l r e p r e s e n t a t i o n is c o n c e r n e d , t h e effect is pretty m u c h the same: W e s t e r n m e n travel E a s t t o " o p e n u p " a culture t h a t is b e g u i l i n g , e l u s i v e , " o t h e r " ; t h e y c o u r t its f r a g i l e w o m e n ; a n d then t h e y - - often a b r u p t l y leave. J a p a n as i m a g i n a t i v e z o n e e n c o u r ages t e m p o r a r y e n g a g e m e n t , f o l l o w e d s h o r t l y b y d i s e n t a n g l e m e n t a n d nostalgia in retreat. 11
L o t i ' s J a p a n continues t o h a u n t several c o n t e m p o r a r y travel nar r a t i v e s l i k e , f o r e x a m p l e , P i c o I y e r ' s The Lady and the Monk (1991), even a l l o w i n g f o r the later w o r k ' s greater subtlety a n d m o r e n u a n c e d t o n e . I y e r ' s b o o k is i n f o r m e d b y a p e r c e p t i v e o u t s i d e r ' s a n a l y s i s o f J a p a n e s e c u l t u r a l t r a d i t i o n s ; b u t i t is d o m i n a t e d , f o r a l l t h a t , b y t h e writer's fervid r o m a n t i c i m a g i n a r y , p r o d u c i n g layers o f self-conscious f a n t a s y i n a m u l t i l e v e l n a r r a t i v e . W i t h i n this n a r r a t i v e , I y e r locates t w o J a p a n s , t h e " s o l a r " a n d t h e " l u n a r . " S o l a r J a p a n is " a t o y l a n d g o n e berserk w i t h a n intensity that could n o t h a v e been further f r o m the l y r i c a l l a n d I i m a g i n e d " (5), a n d a n a t i o n p o i s e d t o c o n t r o l t h e g l o b a l e c o n o m y , a "collective rising s u n o f e c o n o m i c p o w e r " ( 7 ) . L u n a r J a p a n , o n t h e o t h e r h a n d , is r o m a n t i c a n d m y s t i c a l . T h e t r a d i t i o n s o f K y o t o , H o k u s a i prints, a n d K a w a b a l a n o v e l s are p a r t o f this J a p a n ; so t o o a r e " t h e r a i n y - n i g h t lyrics o f J a p a n e s e w o m e n , [ a n d ] t h e c l e a r w a t e r h a i k u o f i t i n e r a n t / e n m o n k s " (<j). K y o t o , a " t e m p l e d c i t y t h a t h a d b e e n t h e c a p i t a l f o r a I b o u m i i l d v e n t ' s " (12), is w h e r e I y e r b e g i n s his q u e s t l o j o i n h i m s e l f t o it l a n l i o i y t h a t w e m N t o stir s o m e t h i n g in h i s •1
:I|
o w n past. H e finds t h e B u d d h i s t t e m p l e w h e r e he m a k e s his first h o m e s i t u a t e d i n t h e d i s t r i c t o f w h a t is v a r i o u s l y c a l l e d " t h e w a t e r t r a d e , " "the
floating
w o r l d , " a n d "the pleasure quarters," and imagines he will
live t h e link, celebrated in literature a n d c o n f i r m e d in e t y m o l o g y , b e t w e e n the w o r l d s o f m o n k a n d g e i s h a - c o n c u b i n e . H e clinches this l i n k b y c i t i n g o n e o f B a s h o ' s classic h a i k u s : " A t t h e s a m e i n n / P l a y w o m e n t o o w e r e s l e e p i n g / B u s h c l o v e r a n d t h e m o o n " (21). H e t h u s sets u p f o r a n a r r a t i v e t h a t w i l l i n d u l g e b o t h a r e l i g i o u s t e x t ( B u d d h i s t monasteries, Z e n m o n k s ) a n d a romantic-erotic one, a n d will bring the t w o into m u t u a l play. B u t the temple belongs m o r e t o "solar" than t o " l u n a r " J a p a n , a n d I y e r stays o n l y briefly. Its t w o resident m o n k s are a e u n u c h a n d a n albino: t h e one clad in a M i c k e y M o u s e T-shirt a n d scooting a r o u n d o n a tricycle; the o t h e r s h o w i n g snapshots o f h i m s e l f i n f a m o u s w o r l d cities; b o t h o f t h e m T V a d d i c t s . I y e r q u i c k l y e s c a p e s f r o m this f e m i n i z e d , infantilistic cloister, m o v i n g t o a n a p a r t m e n t o n the o t h e r side o f the city. I m m e r s i o n i n t h e w o r l d o f t h e m o n k seems d i f f i c u l t ; b u t t h e n p e r h a p s I y e r is less i n t e r e s t e d i n m e d i a t i n g J a p a n e s e t r a d i t i o n s a n d a n c i e n t Z e n p r a c t i c e s t h a n h e is i n i n v o k i n g t h e idea o f t h e m o n k as a p o i n t o f s e l f - i d e n t i f i c a t i o n t o f a c i l i t a t e t h e p r o d u c t i o n o f the romantic-erotic text. G i v e n Iyer's t e n d e n c y t o assimilate J a p a n t o his o w n n o s t a l g i a f o r a l o s t h o m e , i t is n o t s u r p r i s i n g t h a t h e r e f e r s t h e c o u n t r y h e v i s i t s i n t h e late t w e n t i e t h c e n t u r y b a c k t o the celebrated H e i a n c o u r t culture o f nearly a t h o u s a n d years before. H u g h C o r t a z z i has defined the H e i a n p e r i o d a s elitist, " c r e a t e d b y a s m a l l h e r e d i t a r y a r i s t o c r a c y , w h o w e r e largely divorced f r o m t h e agricultural e c o n o m y w h i c h p r o v i d e d t h e e c o n o m i c basis f o r their existence," a n d cultist, p r o d u c i n g " a n aes t h e t i c c u l t o f b e a u t y i n n a t u r e a n d a r t " (40). I y e r uses t h e l y r i c a l s e t pieces o f h i s n a r r a t i v e , f e a t u r i n g t h e m o o n , w a t e r , l o v e r s , g i g g l i n g g i r l s , a n d p l a y f u l c h i l d r e n , t o t e x t u a l i z e the " H e i a n v i s i o n I h a d s o u g h t since c h i l d h o o d " (338). T h i s v i s i o n p r o v i d e s s c o p e i n t u r n f o r O r i e n t a l i s t f e m i n i z i n g , as I y e r , e x p l o i t i n g the b i n a r y o p p o s i t i o n o f m o n k versus l a d y , teases i t i n t o a p l a y o f s e d u c t i o n a n d r e s i s t a n c e , " l a d y t e m p t i n g m o n k , m o n k r e n o u n c i n g l a d y " (98). I y e r ' s C h r y s a n t h e m u m is S a c h i k o , a r o u n d thirty, m o t h e r o ft w o children, married to a salaryman. F r o m t h e m o m e n t I y e r m e e t s S a c h i k o , she carries the b u r d e n o f m e d i a t i n g the " r i d d l e " o f H e i a n J a p a n . S a c h i k o has m o r e roles t o p l a y , o f c o u r s e , than that o f H e i a n L a d y t o Iyer's M o n k . B u t while Iyer concedes " a sense o f t h e t i g h t l y d r a w n l i m i t s o f a J a p a n e s e w o n m n ' s l i f e " (H9). h e p r o b e s t h e s e o n l y in r e l a t i o n t o his f a n t a s y o f M u p m i w i W W O t u n n , " »'
Miuitlkl
N UM 111 J V '".uiul'IIHJIli
Housewife, mother, Sting fan, avid moviegoer, Sachiko embodies t h e e n i g m a o f " J a p a n e s e w o m a n , " o f J a p a n itself/herself. I y e r r e p r e sents t h i s u p d a t e d C h r y s a n t h e m u m a s a f i g u r e o f c o m i c p a t h o s , i n w h o m A m e r i c a n c u l t u r e is a s s i m i l a t e d i n t o m i n i a t u r i z e d J a p a n e s e frames. L o t i ' s condescension resurfaces in Iyer's pidgin v e n t r i l o q u i s m ; h e r e , f o r e x a m p l e , is S a c h i k o r e c o u n t i n g h e r v i s i t t o The Sound of Music: " I v e r y s c a r e d . A l l d a r k . M a n y p e r s o n t h e r e . B u t t h e n , film b e g i n , I s o o n f o r g e t . I m u c h l o v e . I d r e a m I J u l i e A n d r e w s " (89). W h e n Iyer responds in a similar pidgin, h e seems t o a c k n o w l e d g e the a s y m m e t r y i n v o l v e d i n this k i n d o f literary r o m a n c e : " ' B u t d r e a m w o r l d n o t so g o o d , ' I r e p l i e d , r e f l e c t i n g h e r E n g l i s h b a c k t o h e r . . . . I r e a l i z e d t h a t I m u s t be s o u n d i n g b i z a r r e l y like R i c h a r d C h a m b e r l a i n addressing t h e a b o r i g i n e s i n The Last Wave" (252). H a v i n g ruled o u t a n y engagement with a J a p a n that might pose a t h r e a t t o A m e r i c a n e c o n o m i c h e g e m o n y , I y e r is free t o c o n s t r u c t it o u t o f s c r a p s o f l i t e r a r y t r a d i t i o n a n d a n u r b a n c u l t u r e p i c t u r e d as v u l g a r i z e d f a i r y tale. F o r I y e r , S a c h i k o personifies b o t h t h e H e i a n a n d t h e W a l t D i s n e y Japans. Sachiko's "soft femininity" allows h i m t o project J a p a n as a n a l l u r i n g r e a l m t h a t m a k e s n o significant p u r c h a s e o n h i m ; h e is f r e e t o c o m e a n d g o , a n d finally t o l e a v e , w h i l e t h i s m y t h i c i z e d " J a p a n " c o n t i n u e s t o e x i s t i n t h e f o r m it h a d a l r e a d y t a k e n o n t h e clay o f his a r r i v a l . N o m a t t e r h o w s e n s i t i v e , s e l f - r e f l e x i v e , a n d k n o w l e d g e a b l e h e is a s t r a v e l e r a n d c u l t u r a l c o m m e n t a t o r , I y e r f a i l s t o c h a l l e n g e e n d u r i n g O r i e n t a l i s t m y t h s " o f s t r o n g m a n l i n e s s a n d soft f e m i n i n i t y a n d thedoctrine o f male supremacy . . . invented during the samuraim i l i t a r i s t p e r i o d s " ( M i y o s h i 196). H e d o e s , h o w e v e r , s u c c e e d i n e v a c u a t i n g t h e Japanese m a l e f r o m t h e ( O r i e n t a l ) z o n e . W h i l e S a c h i k o is s p a r e d C h r y s a n t h e m u m ' s l u t e , I y e r l e a v e s h e r j u s t as s u r e l y c o n t a i n e d b y W e s t e r n r o m a n c e . S t e p b y s t e p h e l e a d s h e r to recognize h e r subjection t o the d r e a m w o r l d o f the media. A t the end, she plans t o divorce h e r — a l r e a d y i n v i s i b l e — h u s b a n d , has trained to b e a t o u r g u i d e , a n d h a s e v e n p l u c k e d u p c o u r a g e t o t a k e a t o u r a b r o a d w i t h h e r " s a v i o r " P i c o . I y e r r e v e a l i n g l y r e m a r k s that s h e h a s b e e n " c l e a r l y c a p t i v e t o n o t h i n g but h e r s i t u a t i o n , c a p t i v e t o J a p a n , in f a c t " (265). S o I y e r h a s " r e s c u e d " S a c h i k o , b u t o n l y f r o m the z o n e o f his o w n e n c h a n t m e n t . H e then g o e s o n l o cite t w o p o w e r f u l l y m a n i p u -
l a l i v e m y t h s , c o m m e n t i n g I tin 1 classical n o v e l i s t s d w e l l u p o n y o u n g w o m e n " m o s t l y f o r t h e use t h e y i n a d o o l ' l h e i n , p y g m a l i o n i z i n g llieni. t r e a t i n g t h e m ns f l o w e r s a l u m n i "
a n d I'nnliiHizing t h a t
Sachiko
" w u s a k i n d o f s l e e p i n g h o m i l y a w t i J H M i c d b y H n u a n c e " (i;,;t). S u c h a n a
lytic e m b r o i d e r y suggests that Iyer's c o n s t r u c t i o n o f a n " o t h e r " ( O r i e n t a l ) c u l t u r e seeks t h o s e f a m i l i a r satisfactions o f t r a v e l
writing—nos
t a l g i a , f a n t a s y , p o w e r — t h a t a r e d e p e n d e n t o n c o n v e n t i o n a l a n d selec tive m o d e s o f experience. J o h n D a v i d M o r l e y ' s Pictures from the Water Trade (1985), i n c o n trast, d e m o n s t r a t e s that the travel b o o k can d r a w familiar items f r o m a collective image-reservoir o f the exotic a n d m e d i a t e t h e m
through
personal experience t o p r o d u c e a culturally richer d o c u m e n t . M o r l e y ' s b o o k is t e c h n i c a l l y a n o v e l s i n c e its t r a v e l e r - p r o t a g o n i s t is t h e t h i r d p e r s o n B o o n , b u t its p r o v i s i o n o f a p e r s o n a f o r t h e t r a v e l e r a n d o f a m o t i v a t i o n f o r t r a v e l , a n d its u s e o f i l l u s t r a t i v e a n e c d o t e s f o r e t h n o graphic reflection, are evidence o f the travel narrative, delivered in a n i n n o v a t i v e f o r m . B y creating the character o f B o o n , M o r l e y achieves a d o u b l e d d i s t a n c e f r o m his n a r r a t i v e m a t e r i a l : B o o n e x p e r i e n c e s J a p a n , a n d M o r l e y reports B o o n ' s reflections. A n d unlike so m a n y o t h e r travel writers, M o r l e y presents a J a p a n o f conceptual difference, o f codes n o t i m m e d i a t e l y accessible t o a m a t e u r W e s t e r n e t h n o g r a p h y . M o r l e y ' s n a r r a t i v e finds its p l a c e w i t h i n a n e x p a n d i n g s u b g e n r e 8
o f travel writing, the"visiting teacher-student" a c c o u n t : ' h e w e n t t o J a p a n o r i g i n a l l y o n a c u l t u r a l s c h o l a r s h i p a n d spent p a r t o f his t h r e e y e a r s t a y t e a c h i n g E n g l i s h . T h e i m p l i e d p r e m i s e o f t h i s s u b g e n r e is t h a t t h e p e d a g o g i c a l v i s i t is i n i t s e l f h e u r i s t i c ,
a n d problematic
aspects o f the process o f acquiring insider k n o w l e d g e o f a different culture are duly f o r e g r o u n d e d . M o r l e y underlines the provisionality o f his experiment in cultural investigation, consistently
exposing
B o o n ' s incomplete knowledge and emphasizing h o w cultural under s t a n d i n g u n d e r g o e s c o n t i n u o u s r e v i s i o n . Pictures
from
the
Water
Trade t h u s c o n s t r u c t s a l i b e r a t i n g p l a y b e t w e e n its p r o t a g o n i s t ' s c o o l self-confidence a n d t h e d a w n i n g sense o f a c u l t u r a l z o n e t h a t p r o v e s resistant t o d e c o d i n g . A s its title indicates, M o r l e y ' s b o o k shares a central t r o p e w i t h m o s t W e s t e r n travel b o o k s a b o u t J a p a n — a strongly eroticized z o n e . W h i l e B o o n / M o r l e y , u n l i k e L o t i a n d I y e r , d o e s n o t excise o t h e r m e n f r o m t h e z o n e , h e still c e n t e r s t h e t e x t o n M a r i k o , t h e t a r g e t o f h i s p a r ticular sexual quest, a n d o n t h e " w a t e r t r a d e " (also k n o w n as t h e " f l o a t i n g w o r l d " ) as a n e n v e l o p i n g c o n t e x t f o r h i s e r o t i c a d v e n t u r e s . E v e n w h e n M o r l e y focuses o n c u l t u r a l practices (shodo),
like
these suggest erotic experience. H i s m o s t insistent
calligraphy nietonym
f o r J a p a n e s e e r o t i c s is t h e n a p e o f t h e n e c k ( " J a p a n e s e w o m e n s h o w e d themselves m o s t beautiful w h e r e they were also most v u l n e r a b l e " IK7]), Kfi
1111!u 1 s i s w i i i i rvi-i'wwi'l 1 1
b u t , as h e d e m o n s t r a t e s , a great m a n y t h i n g s — n o t just parts o f the b o d y — c a n i n d e x the erotic: B o o n still h a d n o i n k l i n g o f the b r e a d t h a n d r e s o n a n c e o f
shodo.
h i m it w a s l a r g e l y t h e s e n s u a l f r i c t i o n o f c o n t r a s t s , b l a c k a n d wet-dry, hard-soft. flush,
The dark
illicit s e x u a l i t y w i t h w h i c h
For
white,
shodo
was
the r a m p a n t b r u s h spilling o n t o the p a g e , all this h a d e x c i t e d h i m
f r o m t h e v e r y s t a r t , a n d b y c h a n c e it c l a s h e d w i t h a d i s c o v e r y h e m a d e at a b o u t the s a m e time he t o o k up
shodo.
After three or four
inert
m o n t h s he h a d a w o k e n to the attractiveness o f J a p a n e s e w o m e n .
(86)
Passages like this o n e d r a w a clear c o n n e c t i o n b e t w e e n the erotics o f cultural practices a n d t h e potentially sexual n a t u r e o f cross-cultural encounters. A n d , i n contrast with Iyer, w h o overlays his relationship w i t h S a c h i k o w i t h o b f u s c a t i n g layers o f r o m a n t i c sentimentality, M o r ley describes t h e B o o n - M a r i k o r e l a t i o n s h i p w i t h c a n d o r w h i l e using t h e p o s s i b i l i t i e s it a f f o r d s f o r i n t e r r o g a t i n g r o m a n t i c c o n v e n t i o n s in different cultures. M o r l e y m o v e s easily f r o m experiential n a r r a t i v e t h r o u g h analysis to c o n t e x t u a l i z a t i o n o f the particular p h e n o m e n o n w i t h i n b r o a d e r cul t u r a l structures. T h e w a t e r t r a d e , f o r i n s t a n c e , p r o d u c e s specific p r a c tices i n r e l a t i o n t o c u l t u r a l i d e o l o g y . I n a n a l y z i n g o n e p a r t i c u l a r l y v i v i d e p i s o d e , i n w h i c h B o o n / M o r l e y visits a c a b a r e t w h e r e the e x t e n t o f the c l i e n t s ' " f r e e d o m " is t o f o n d l e t h e e m p l o y e e s ' b r e a s t s . M o r l e y sees t h e c a b a r e t as a n a n t i - O e d i p a l i n s t i t u t i o n o f m o t h e r s a n d d a u g h t e r s w h e r e the phallic a s p i r a t i o n s o f m a l e c u s t o m e r s m u s t b e " k e p t u n d e r I he c o u n t e r . " W h a t B o o n / M o r l e y sees is a m y t h a s o l d as h u m a n i t y . . . T h e desire for m o t h e r s a n d sisters, real e n o u g h but afraid o f censure, defied t a b o o u n d e r the veil o f s y m b o l . T h e p a r t n e r s o f desire w e r e m o t h e r s a n d sisters in n o m o r e t h a n n a m e ; it w a s o n l y p l a y . I n t h i s w a t e r y m y t h o l o g i c a l l a n d s c a p e t h e r e w a s n o Laius,
and
hence
no
Oedipus.
Sage
mamas
prevented
sons
putting o u t their eyes b y k e e p i n g fathers eternally o u t o f sight.
from (214)
T h e d i s c o v e r y t h a t " t h e a n d r o g y n o u s w o r d chichi. .. w a s a h o m o n y m , e i t h e r b r e a s t o r f a t h e r b u t n o t b o t h a t t h e s a m e t i m e " (213) m a k e s t h e analysis plausible. T h e d e n s e s t c u l t u r a l a n d i d e o l o g i c a l c o n s t r u c t f o r M o r l e y is t h e i n s i d e r / o u t s i d e r o p p o s i t i o n . T h e u r g e l o u n d e r s l a n d t h i s o p p o s i t i o n as f u l l y a s p o s s i b l e p r e s e n t s a m n l o r l u l c h a l l e n g e l o h i m , since it b e a r s u p o n his o w n q u e s t a t o m r c i i l l n r t i l a n d s e x u a l t o b e c o m e a n i n s i d e r . T h e b o o k s u g g e s t s t h a i MIR i p i n l hi p i i M l v s u c c e s s f u l , b u t e v e n Y 1 1
N1
so M o r l e y recognizes t h a t n o visitor c a n " p e n e t r a t e " a n o t h e r culture. T h a t r e c o g n i t i o n , a n d t h e w a y i n w h i c h i t is p r e s e n t e d a s e v o l v i n g , a r e further indications o f the narrator's candor. M u c h o f w h a t [ B o o n ] h a d l e a r n e d a n d t h o u g h t he h a d a c q u i r e d f r o m the J a p a n e s e character a n d w a y o f life w a s o n l y a precious veneer, s o m e t h i n g o n t h e surface w h i c h i n his heart h e d i d n o t share. A s i f this insight h a d disqualified h i m in his o w n eyes B o o n b e g a n t o feel a l m o s t like a n i m p o s t e r a m o n g his J a p a n e s e friends. W h a t w e r e these things h e c o u l d n o t share. R u e f u l l y h e h a d t o a d m i t t h a t h e d i d n o t k n o w . H i s claims t o f a m i l i a r i t y w i t h J a p a n e s e culture w e r e u n f o u n d e d . (186-87) R o l a n d B a r t h e s , w h o s e Empire of Signs (1970) h a s b e e n d e s c r i b e d as " o n e o f t h e m o s t r a d i c a l l y d i f f e r e n t t r a v e l b o o k s e v e r w r i t t e n " ( P o r t e r 228), w o u l d p r o b a b l y h a v e a p p r o v e d o f t h e a g n o s t i c i s m M o r ley attributes t o B o o n . F o r B a r t h e s , E u r o p e ' s e n g a g e m e n t w i t h " o t h e r ness," d e m o n s t r a t e d in a n a r r a y o f scientific a n d nonscientific
dis
c o u r s e s , " m a n i f e s t s ] t h e d e s t i n y o f o u r [ E u r o p e a n ] n a r c i s s i s m " (4): i n o t h e r w o r d s , w h e n E u r o p e e n c o u n t e r s d i f f e r e n c e , it i n e v i t a b l y sets i n m o t i o n a process assimilating the unfamiliar t o t h e E u r o p e a n k n o w n . A s i a is a c a s e i n p o i n t : " W e " e n d u p " a l w a y s a c c l i m a t i n g o u r i n c o g nizance o f A s i a b y m e a n s o f certain k n o w n languages (the O r i e n t o f V o l t a i r e , o f t h e Revue Asiatique,
o f P i e r r e L o t i , o f Air France)"
(4). I n
his travel b o o k , t h e n , B a r t h e s t u r n s L o t i ' s f a n t a s y o f p e n e t r a t i n g t o the v e r y h e a r t o f J a p a n inside o u t . M o r l e y r e c o g n i z e s that J a p a n , as z o n e , is d e f i n e d i n c o d e s h e c a n n o t p e n e t r a t e ; B a r t h e s ' s c o n c e i t is r a t h e r t h a t t h e s e c o d e s , f a r f r o m s t i m u l a t i n g p e n e t r a t i v e d e s i r e , insist o n s u r f a c e a n d p l a n e . J a p a n attracts precisely b e c a u s e it contests t h e W e s t e r n drive f o r understanding and mastery, f o r penetrating to the cultural " h e a r t . " I t challenges W e s t e r n semiological systems, especially the o n e t h a t seeks t o c o n t a i n difference b y s i t u a t i n g it w i t h i n a r i g i d b i n a r y o f (Western) masculine and (Oriental) feminine. Empire of Signs is n o t a c h r o n o l o g i c a l l y o r d e r e d n a r r a t i v e , b u t r a t h e r a c o l l e c t i o n o f e s s a y s t h a t p r o c e e d s t h r o u g h a series o f a p p a r ently arbitrary topics: f o o d , city plans a n d m a p s , packages, B u n r a k u theater, Z e n a n d t h e h a i k u , faces a n d b o d i e s , a n d s o o n . T o k y o , w h i c h B a r t h e s c h a r a c t e r i z e s as " i n itself a n a m a z i n g m a s s o f e t h n o g r a p h i c m a t e r i a l " (Grain of the Voice 264)—a c i t y " h e e n j o y e d . . . w i t h o u t the b a d faith o f an ethnologist w h o goes to e x a m i n e foreign c o u n t r i e s " (230)
d r a w s the material into t h e collusiveness o f (he
KH
lOliJUSTS W i l l i
I VI'ltW
c o n v e n t i o n a l travel b o o k . But Barthes d i s a v o w s any intention
to
actually represent Japan; he invites the reader instead to accept " J a p a n " as a semiotic system, a fantasy z o n e constructed from " a cer tain n u m b e r o f [distinguishing] features" (Empire
of Signs 3). N e v e r
theless, Barthes's empire o f signs does signify, and in contexts that are similar to those o f m o r e o r t h o d o x travel b o o k s . T a k e his assertion that "in that c o u n t r y 1 am calling Japan sexuality is in sex, not else w h e r e , " whereas in the U n i t e d States, "sex is everywhere, except in sexuality" (28-29). But for Barthes, as for M o r l e y , the " e l s e w h e r e " that does not exist in sex is in eroticism—an eroticism that infuses hosts o f cultural practices and p r o d u c t i o n s . T h u s , he talks o f "the pure . . . erotic project o f the Japanese b o d y " (10); c h o p s t i c k s are " s o m e t h i n g maternal . . . the instrument never pierces, cuts, or si its. never w o u n d s but only selects, turns, shifts" (16); vegetables an: "garbed in an aesthetic n a k e d n e s s " (19); a calligraphy brush "has the carnal, lubrified flexibility o f the h a n d " (86); and, m o r e startling, lie gives us the "the i m a g e o f a n a k e d Japanese b o y , tied up very neatly like a sausage: the sadistic intent . . . absorbed in the practice o f an extreme art: that o f the p a c k a g e , o f fastening"
(45). T h e cult 11 nil
seduction registered here is not, after all, so very different from tinone w e find in Iyer's and M o r l e y ' s a c c o u n t s . Barthes's " J a p a n " is not a country so much as it is a pretext foi rejecting Western sign systems that encode "the rights o f the T a l l i n tongue"" (6). T h i s West, phallic and patriarchal, "moistens everyl.hin with meaning . . . i m p o s i n g ] baptism on entire peoples" (70): its " w a y s of interpretation are intended to pierce m e a n i n g " (72). A l l y i n g himself with other French poststructuralists o f the period (Derrida, Lacan, KLristeva), Barthes uses Japan to celebrate the kind o f play with signifiers that produces w h a t these theorists call puissance—•& rebels against the authority.'
9
fixed
play that
signification they associate with cullunil
W h e n Barthes describes a Japanese body, in fairly ordi
nary circumstances, as "sustaining] with y o u a sort o f b a b b l e " (10), he is p r o b a b l y alluding to the form o f pre-Oedipal babble (explicated by Lacan and Kristeva) that functions as a m o d e o f intimate connection between infant and mother, and that is brielly available before llu: baby is forced into the phallic world (hat I.acan calls "the Symbolic order."
Dennis
Porter,
in
Haunted
Journeys,
explains
Barlhes's
improbable rhapsody over cliopslii'kN in terms of his celebration of a maternalized Japan:
MMM
M-
C h o p s t i c k s r e a w a k e n i n B a r t h e s t h e pleasures o f o r a l i t y a n d o f t h e m o t h e r ' s b o d y f r o m w h i c h w e are separated a t the m o m e n t o f o u r weaning and o u r entry into paternal language o r the symbolic order . . . [ T h e y represent a] f a n t a s y . . . o f d y a d i c p l e n i t u d e a n d a breast that is a l w a y s there. (298-99) O r a l i t y thus becomes a privileged alternative to the overdetermined c o d e s o f W e s t e r n w r i t i n g ; it is n o t s u r p r i s i n g , i n t h i s c o n t e x t , t h a t B a r t h e s t a k e s p a r t i c u l a r p l e a s u r e i n not u n d e r s t a n d i n g a f o r e i g n l a n g u a g e , a n d i n i n t u i t i n g its c h a l l e n g e — b e y o n d t h e t y r a n n y o f " m e a n i n g " — t o t h e " f a t h e r t o n g u e . " W h i l e Empire of Signs c a n c e r t a i n l y b e seen as a different k i n d o f travel n a r r a t i v e , P o r t e r ' s c l a i m t h a t " i t m a r k s a n e n d o f t r a v e l l i t e r a t u r e as w e h a v e k n o w n it i n t h e W e s t " is e x c e s s i v e ( i n ) . A l t h o u g h B a r t h e s ' s r o m a n t i c i z a t i o n o f J a p a n is v e r y d i f f e r e n t f r o m , s a y , I y e r ' s i n d u l g e n t s e n t i m e n t a l i s m , h i s b o o k still b e a r s w i t h i n its e m p i r e t h e f a m i l i a r s i g n s o f ( e x o t i c ) r o m a n c e . I f t h e b o o k is m a r k e d b y t h e particular grace, playfulness, a n d intelligence that B a r t h e s h a s a t h i s d i s p o s a l , it is n o t s o u n u s u a l i n s u b j e c t i n g J a p a n e s e c u l t u r a l f o r m s t o s y m p a t h e t i c scrutiny. A n d it d o e s after a l l — i n e v i t a b l y i n a c c u r a t e l y — r e p r e s e n t aspects o f a n actual culture while t r a n s f o r m i n g t h e site o f t h a t c u l t u r e i n t o a n i m a g i n a t i v e z o n e . B a r t h e s c o n t i n u a l l y r e m i n d s his readers that t h e J a p a n e s e sign h a s n o referent t h a t h e w i l l c l a i m f o r it. B u t o f c o u r s e t h e s i g n d o e s r e f e r : i t s r e f e r e n t is f o u n d w i t h i n the context o f Barthes's rejection o f W e s t e r n semiology, w i t h its r a g e f o r " m e a n i n g , " j o i n i n g w i t h a. p a r t i c u l a r p e r s p e c t i v e o n J a p a n as a culture saturated w i t h n o n s i g n i f y i n g codes. I f a feature o f t r a v e l w r i t i n g is its p r o p e n s i t y f o r e s c a p i s m , t h e n Empire of Signs t a k e s u p its p l a c e within, a s w e l l a s a g a i n s t , t h e g e n r e ; a n d i f a f e a t u r e o f O r i e n t a l i s t t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s is c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n o f t h e O r i e n t a s f e m i n i n e , t h e n B a r t h e s ' s b o o k c e r t a i n l y o c c u p i e s s p a c e as a n O r i e n t a l i z i n g t e x t . A s L i s a L o w e has concluded a b o u t such narratives, A n a n t i t e x t t o the W e s t [ , ] . . . J a p a n is u l t i m a t e l y n o t a n " a t o p i a " b u t a " U t o p i a . " . . . [Barthes's] desire t o escape his o w n subjectivity, his t o r y , a n d l a n g u a g e is quite evidently a n o p p o s i t i o n a l desire, still c a u g h t w i t h t h e b i n a r y logic he seeks t o a v o i d . J a p a n is c o n t i n u a l l y described w i t h reference t o the O c c i d e n t , solely in terms o f w h a t t h e O c c i d e n t is not. (159) Barthes's m o v e t o bracket referentiality
i n this " J a p a n "
ultimately
l e a d s h i m t o a m o d e o f e s s e n t i a l i z i n g t h a t is n o less c o m p l e t e t h a n i n other, m o r e c o n v e n t i o n a l l y presented travel b o o k s . 1 1 M 1141 SI S W I I II I V 1 ' I W H H |i n
ZONE
The
THREE:
"otherworldliness"
of
THE
Japan,
SOUTH
SEAS
as c a p t u r e d
in a variety o f
( s e m i ) u t o p i a n E u r o - A m e r i c a n t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s , is r e p l i c a t e d in t h a t m o s t Utopian o f t r a v e l l o c a t i o n s : t h e S o u t h S e a s . P a u l T h e r o u x , f o r i n s t a n c e , b e g i n n i n g h i s p a d d l e - b o r n e t o u r o f t h e r e g i o n i n The
Happy
Isles of Oceania (1992), m u s e s t h a t " t h e P a c i f i c s e e m e d l i k e o u t e r s p a c e , an i m m e n s i t y o f e m p t i n e s s , d o t t e d w i t h m i s s h a p e n i s l a n d s t h a t t w i n k l e d l i k e s t a r s , a r c h i p e l a g o e s l i k e s t a r c l u s t e r s " (18). T h e r o u x ' s t e r m s are suggestive o f a last f r o n t i e r , c h i l d h o o d w o n d e r , a n d a frisson o f the grotesque—all o f w h i c h w e m i g h t expect in a traveler's response t o z o n e s a s " e n c h a n t i n g " a s t h e P a c i f i c . B u t t h e s i m i l e a s a w h o l e is a l s o historically apposite, echoing the poetic delight o f K e a t s , w h o , in " O n F i r s t L o o k i n g i n t o C h a p m a n ' s H o m e r " (1816), r e g i s t e r s t h e n a i v e w o n d e r o f a " w a t c h e r o f t h e skies / W h e n a n e w p l a n e t s w i m s i n t o h i s k e n . " A s t r o n o m i c a l science h a d m a d e t h e h e a v e n s accessible as a figure f o r t h e w o n d e r o f " d i s c o v e r y " n o t so l o n g b e f o r e , w h e n C o o k ,
sailing
the Pacific, o b s e r v e d t h e transit o f V e n u s a n d p r o d u c e d his m a p s (1768-71); t h u s it w a s t h a t t h e P a c i f i c e n t e r e d i n t o B r i t i s h c o n s c i o u s n e s s , b o t h a s a m a p p a b l e r e g i o n a n d , n o less, a s a m y t h - g e n e r a t i n g zone.
2 0
A t t h e s a m e t i m e , t h e S o u t h S e a s b e c a m e a v a i l a b l e a s a site f o r
t h e i n t e r r o g a t i o n o f r e l a t i o n s b e t w e e n d i f f e r e n t d i s c o u r s e s : on t h e o n e hand, those o f geography a n d a n t h r o p o l o g y a n d , o n theother, those o f travel writing.
C o n t e m p o r a r y travel writing a b o u t the Pacific
i n e v i t a b l y s u p p l e m e n t s its t e s t i m o n i e s of e x p e r i e n c e a n d c o n t a c t w i t h a v a r i e t y of o t h e r d i s c o u r s e s , p a r t i c u l a r l y
those o f ethnography, f o r 2
w h o s e d e v e l o p m e n t t h e r e g i o n h a s b e e n so i n s t r u m e n t a l . ' T r a v e l ing/writing
t h e P a c i f i c testifies to a m b i v a l e n c e a n d u n d e c i d a b i l i t y :
p o i s e d b e t w e e n t h e scientism o f d i s c i p l i n a r y treatises a n d t h e height ened impressionism o f narratives o f (experienced) contact, contempo r a r y t r a v e l s / t r a v e l o g u e s in t h e P a c i f i c m i m i c b o t h t h e a c c u m u l a t e d records o f the past t w o a n d a half centuries a n d the region's g e o g r a p h y i t s e l f as t h e y m o v e r e s t l e s s l y f r o m i s l a n d t o " e n c h a n t e d " i s l a n d . T h e cultural geographer D e r e k G r e g o r y has recently
underlined
the " e x t r a o r d i n a r y significance o f the S o u t h Pacific f o r t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e n a t u r a l s c i e n c e s " a n d , b y e x t e n s i o n , t h e h u m a n sciences at a time w h e n the contents a n d contexts o f E u r o p e a n knowledges were b e g i n n i n g (0 c o n s t i t u t e a n e w ( F o u e n u l d i a n ) e p i s t c m e (20). O b s e r v a tion records a n d expedition reports, although " m e d i a l e d b y E u r o p e a n c o n c e p t u a l c a t e g o r i e s a n d E u r o p e a n w a y s o f s e e i n g " ( G r e g o r y 23). / I L L ' ,
Ml
claimed authority deriving f r o m on-the-spot witness. S o m e early inves tigators a t t e m p t e d a degree o f self-reflexiveness, a c k n o w l e d g i n g s o m e reciprocity in encounters between themselves a n d indigenous "others," b u t o b v i o u s l y t h e y c o u l d n o t s i m p l y c a n c e l t h e i r p o s i t i o n as c o l o n i z e r s , their i m m e n s e privilege in situations w h e r e their ultimate a i m w a s t o possess the culture o f the " o t h e r . " T r a v e l w r i t i n g c a m e to j o i n a n t h r o p o l o g y , g e o g r a p h y , a n d t h e h u m a n sciences g e n e r a l l y as o n e s t r a n d o f a n e w r e g i m e o f k n o w l e d g e s a n d as a n e n c o d i n g o f t h e P a c i f i c . C h r o n icles o f t r a v e l a n d a d v e n t u r e , a s G r e g o r y p u t s it, a d d e d " a f f e c t i v e response" a n d " e m o t i o n a l investment" t o m o r e "scientific" m o d e s o f i n f o r m a t i o n a l d i s s e m i n a t i o n (20). B u t w h i l e s u c h c h r o n i c l e s — o f b o t h p a s t a n d p r e s e n t — m i g h t s e e m t o b e less m e d i a t e d , a n d m o r e e x p e r i e n tially based, t h a n f o r m a l i z e d discourses, they inevitably share the space a n d b o r r o w t h e a u t h o r i t y o f t h e h u m a n sciences f o r w h i c h t h e e i g h t e e n t h c e n t u r y w a s t o p r o v e so v i t a l . 2 2
R e c e n t S o u t h S e a s t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s c e r t a i n l y a t t e s t t o , a s w e l l as invoke, anthropological authority. Bougainville a n d C o o k ritually a p p e a r , n e x t a cast o f missionaries, traders, a n d b e a c h c o m b e r s w i t h their t a l k o f c a n n i b a l i s m , gifts, a n d t a b o o s , t o b e f o l l o w e d b y the p r o fessional observers M a r g a r e t M e a d , B r o n i s l a w M a l i n o w s k i , a n d M a r shall Sahlins. P a u l T h e r o u x carts M a l i n o w s k i ' s talismanic e t h n o g r a p h y The Sexual Life of Savages (1929) a r o u n d w i t h h i m i n h i s k n a p s a c k ; R o n a l d W r i g h t i n t e r v i e w s S a h l i n s i n a F i j i a n m u s e u m (1986, 182-84). S o u t h S e a travel b o o k s t h u s rehearse e t h n o g r a p h i c lore, setting it a l o n g side t h e " e n c o u n t e r " a n e c d o t e s t h a t are characteristic o f their genre. I n so d o i n g , they echo M a l i n o w s k i ' s o w n Pacific-inspired anxieties, as a r t i c u l a t e d , p a r t i c u l a r l y , i n h i s p o s t h u m o u s l y p u b l i s h e d Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term (1967). I n Diary, M a l i n o w s k i y e a r n s f o r a n e w , m o r e e m o t i o n a l l y i n v o l v e d a n t h r o p o l o g y . M a l i n o w s k i ' s last w o r k testifies t o t h e i n a b i l i t y o f s o c i a l s c i e n t i f i c d i s c o u r s e s t o a c c o u n t f u l l y f o r " e x o t i c " cultures o r t o offer a n " o b j e c t i v e " portrait o f t h e m . M a l i n o w s k i reveals h o w his o w n s u b j e c t i v i t y — h i s loneliness, l o n g i n g s , a n d erotic fantasies—effectively deconstructs the potential f o r a u t h o r i t a t i v e o b s e r v a t i o n a n d accurate description: the activities c o n v e n t i o n a l l y c o n sidered as b o t h m e a n s a n d ends f o r a n t h r o p o l o g i c a l k n o w l e d g e . H e r e a l i z e s t h a t a " d i s p a s s i o n a t e " a p p r o a c h t o h i s m a t e r i a l is s i m p l y n o t possible a n d , m o r e importantly, that anthropological w o r k c a n n o t b e a c c o m p l i s h e d w i t h o u t precisely those personal a n d cultural transac t i o n s t h a t cast t h e p r o j e c t ' s c l a i m s t o s c i e n t i f i c t r u t h in d o u b t , A n t h r o p o l o g i s t s , M a l i n o w s k i i m p l i e s , a r c t r a v e l e r s b e f o r e t h e v a r c scientists;
n •
11 M I N I ' . 1 '
Willi
I YI'IKVVIM 1 '
their self-effacement papers o v e r the g a p between the "objective" truths t h e d i s c i p l i n e seeks t o c a p t u r e a n d t h e i n s t a b i l i t y — t h e m o t i v a t i o n s , d e s i r e s , a n d w i l l - t o - p o w e r — o f scientists a s ( f a l l i b l e ) p e o p l e . O n t h e other h a n d , friendly a n d informal contact experience—of the k i n d that m o s t travel b o o k s aim t o r e c o r d — c a n never i m p a r t certain k n o w l e d g e a b o u t the culture being visited; n o r can they, in the w o r d s o f that S o u t h Seas " o l d h a n d , " R o b e r t L o u i s S t e v e n s o n , "describe the l i f e . . . o f m a n y h u n d r e d t h o u s a n d p e r s o n s , s o m e o f o u r o w n b l o o d a n d l a n g u a g e , all o u r c o n t e m p o r a r i e s , a n d y e t as r e m o t e in t h o u g h t a n d h a b i t as R o b R o y o r B a r b a r o s s a , t h e A p o s t l e s o r t h e C a e s a r s " (6). C o n t e m p o r a r y narratives such as T h e r o u x ' s , o r J u l i a n E v a n s ' s (Transit of Venus, 1992), o r G a v i n B e l l ' s (In Search ofTusitala, 1994), a l l seem chastened b y the opacity o f the islands a n d people o f the Pacific z o n e — a l t h o u g h T h e r o u x , as m i g h t b e e x p e c t e d , is m o r e f o r c e f u l t h a n m o s t i n his a t t e m p t s t o p a r t t h e m i s t . I n the P a c i f i c — a n d m o r e partic ularly, for the m a l e traveler in the Pacific—the experience o f travel has o f t e n b e e n represented i n the t o p o s o f V e n u s : o n o n e level, the planet w h o s e passage across the s u n C o o k h a d sailed s o u t h t o o b s e r v e , b u t o n a n o t h e r a m y t h i c a l b o d y o f a m b i v a l e n c e — t h a t t e a s i n g figure o f f e m a l e allure, seemingly u b i q u i t o u s i n m a l e - a u t h o r e d narratives. Characteristi c a l l y , as J u l i a n E v a n s s u g g e s t s i n The Transit of Venus, 2 3
The
real V e n u s t h a t C o o k o b s e r v e d , in t h e r e p o r t s t h a t h e
brought
b a c k f r o m h i s first c o n f r o n t a t i o n w i t h t h e P a c i f i c , h a d n o t h i n g t o d o w i t h the shade o f another planet trickling across the face o f the sun. The
r e a l V e n u s o b s e r v e d w a s in t h o s e m y t h i c a l a n e c d o t e s , o f f r e e d o m
a n d desire, that m e n are a l w a y s astonished to relate a b o u t
'
women.
(184)
I t is t h i s f a m i l i a r t r o p e o f " f r e e d o m a n d d e s i r e " t h a t M e l v i l l e f a m o u s l y i n v o k e d in his fabrication o f the m a i d e n F a y a w a y in his part novel, p a r t t r a v e l o g u e Typee (1846). I n h e r m o s t c e l e b r a t e d m o m e n t F a y a w a y , v a c a t i o n i n g o n a M a r q u e s a n l a k e w i t h h e r l o v e r T o m m o , is epiphanically "struck with some h a p p y idea": " W i t h a wild exclama t i o n o f delight, she d i s e n g a g e d f r o m h e r p e r s o n t h e a m p l e r o b e o f l a p p a t h a t w a s k n o t t e d o v e r h e r s h o u l d e r . . . a n d s p r e a d i n g it o u t l i k e ;i sail, s t o o d e r e c t w i t h u p r a i s e d u n i t s in t h e h e a d o f t h e c a n o e " (132). f a y a w a y seems t o offer innocent delight; frankness a n d transparency; a n a l t e r n a t i v e b u t readily accessible o r d e r o f experience. S h e also seems t o e x i s t , at least i n t h e l i g h t h e a d e d v i n l o i t N o l ' a NAM I m a n y n u d e t r a v e l ers, as a fad o f P a c i f i c c u l l u i c . MM I m v i n v u v , h k u V e n u s , is a figure o f /
I
.
I
>1
t
f i c t i o n as w e l l as a n o b j e c t o f f a n t a s y . A s T h e r o u x , m u s i n g a b o u t F a y a w a y ' s l a k e i n The Happy Isles of Oceania, n o t e s w i t h t r a d e m a r k w r y ness, [The lake] w a s where the n a k e d F a y a w a y h a d m i s c h i e v o u s l y p l a y e d at being T o m m o ' s mast, a n d w h e r e T o m m o had splashed a m o n g the d u s k y b a t h i n g beauties. . . . " W h a t a b o u t the l a k e ? " I asked. . . . " T h e r e is n o l a k e , " V i c t o r i n e s a i d , a n d a n o t h e r i l l u s i o n w a s s h a t t e r e d .
(395) T h e r o u x , n e v e r less t h a n a k n o w i n g t r a v e l e r , is p l a y i n g t h e r o l e o f a r c h tease h e r e , b u t it is a tease t h a t m a k e s a p o i n t a b o u t h o w t r a v e l n a r r a tives c a n g e n e r a t e a s p a c e f o r t h e m s e l v e s b e t w e e n f a c t a n d m y t h . T h i s i n - b e t w e e n s p a c e is n o t s i m p l y f a n t a s y , b u t a k i n d o f i l l u s i o n a r y surmise in w h i c h a n element o f a n t h r o p o l o g i c a l f a b l e — t h e b e a u t y a n d f r e e d o m o f P a c i f i c i s l a n d w o m e n , f o r e x a m p l e — a p p e a r s as f a c t i t i o u s , y e t a s s o m e t h i n g , f o r all t h a t , t h a t " m e n a r e a l w a y s a s t o n i s h e d t o r e l a t e . " T h e travel writer's i r o n y h o l l o w s o u t t i m e - w o r n illusions b u t also holds t h e m i n s u s p e n s i o n — a s i f t h e r e m i g h t b e s o m e t h i n g t o t h e m a f t e r all. I n seeking t o fulfil their f a n t a s y quests i n f a r a w a y ( F a y a w a y ? ) places, Pacific travelers p a r a d o x i c a l l y enter a t e m p o r a l z o n e o f " e x o t i c memories."
2 4
F o r t r a v e l w r i t e r s , as f o r a n t h r o p o l o g i s t s , t h e " p r i m i
t i v e , " p r e - E u r o p e a n S o u t h Seas island c o r r e s p o n d s t o the lost w o r l d o f c h i l d h o o d ; in that w o r l d , they glimpse the possibility o f recuperating p a r a d i s e , o n l y t o f o r e c l o s e o n it. W h e n b o t h p a s t a n d f u t u r e a p p e a r illusory, the exotic assumes the f o r m o f a frontier z o n e o f despoliation a n d d e s t r u c t i o n ; as E v a n s c o n c l u d e s o f o n e i s l a n d , it w a s " t r a s h a n d o v e r c r o w d i n g , b o y s g e t t i n g p i s s e d o n a S a t u r d a y n i g h t , fighting a n d p o r n videos. I t w a s just like E n g l a n d "
(218).
T h e m o t i v a t i o n s o f B e l l , E v a n s , a n d T h e r o u x f o r a spell i n t h e S o u t h S e a s t u r n o u t t o h a v e b e e n q u i t e s i m i l a r . T h e r o u x , his m a r r i a g e i n t a t t e r s , " w a n t e d t o see t h e e x t r e m e g r e e n isles o f O c e a n i a , u n m o d ern, s u n n y , a n d s l o w " ; he imagines the Pacific t o be a place w h e r e he 25
m i g h t b e " p u r i f i e d b y w a t e r a n d w i l d e r n e s s " (19-20). T h e j o u r n a l i s t Bell, exhausted b y the experience o f covering a sequence o f vicious w a r z o n e s , recalls a n e p i s o d e w h e r e , o n " r e t u r n i n g t o J a v a a f t e r h a v i n g been scared o u t o f m y wits b y a n ill-tempered v o l c a n o near S u m a t r a , [he h a d ] f o u n d p e a c e o n [ S t e v e n s o n ' s ] Beach ofFalesc'r
(4 5 ) . S p u r r e d
o n b y this m e m o r y o f r e c u p e r a t i v e r e a d i n g , Bell e m b a r k s o n a l o u r o f t h e P a c i f i c i n a q u e s t f o r S t e v e n s o n ' s " s p i r i t . " Eviuis'st m o t i v a t i o n s a r e r a l h e r m o r e c o m p l e x . N e w s p a p e r p h o t o g r a p h s o f I V u e e l u v p e r tests
9.1
I 01 H U N T S W I T H
1 v I'ltWI*
(the missiles' reentry vehicles splash d o w n i n a n atoll o f the M a r s h a l l Islands) e v o k e memories o f childhood, o f h o t Q u e e n s l a n d summers, a n d later, bizarrely, o f a n o l d w o m a n i n L o n d o n d a n c i n g w i t h h i m t o t h e s o n g " Y e l l o w P o l k a D o t B i k i n i " (7). G i v e n t h e a p o c a l y p t i c v i o l e n c e o f its p h o t o g r a p h i c t r i g g e r , E v a n s ' s d r e a m o f a " r e t u r n t o t h e h e l i o t r o p i c s e n s a t i o n s o f c h i l d h o o d " s e e m s s o m e w h a t f r a u g h t (9). N e v ertheless, i n c o m p a n y w i t h legions o f o t h e r w h i t e travelers, h e h o p e s f o r " s o m e s u d d e n l i b e r a t i o n f r o m n e u r o s i s a n d d e s i r e " (149). S u c h m o t i v a t i o n s a l r e a d y d i s t a n c e t h e S o u t h P a c i f i c , l i n k i n g it w i t h a z o n e o f r e t u r n t o c h i l d h o o d , o r a r e t r e a t t o s o m e t h i n g l i k e a rest h o m e f o r r e c u perative therapy—"exotic memories." T h e v i s i t o r s , a t t h e i r m o s t f o r t u n a t e , a r r i v e b e f o r e it is " t o o l a t e . " T h e C a n a d i a n t r a v e l e r - w r i t e r G e o r g e W o o d c o c k , i n his d o c u m e n t a r y s t y l e South Sea Journey (1976), n o t e s t h e t r a n s i t i o n f r o m
"traditional
subsistence e c o n o m i e s " t o t o u r i s m a n d r e m a r k s : " I t seemed that w e h a d c h o s e n a crucial time. A d e c a d e ' s d e l a y , a n d w e m i g h t easily a r r i v e t o o l a t e " (19). H e m i g h t w e l l b e e c h o i n g S t e v e n s o n , w h o h a d m i s s e d " t h i n g s a n d p r a c t i c e s . . . t o b e seen i n u s e " t e n y e a r s p r e v i o u s l y , g o i n g o n t o n o t e that " t e n years m o r e , a n d the old society will h a v e entirely v a n i s h e d " : W o o d c o c k ' s " c r u c i a l t i m e " is S t e v e n s o n ' s " h a p p y m o m e n t " ( S t e v e n s o n 224). B e l l , m e a n w h i l e , still i n h o t p u r s u i t o f S t e v e n s o n ' s g h o s t l y presence, t h r o w s a s h a d o w o f a different k i n d o v e r the fleeting a p p e a r a n c e o f " t r a d i t i o n a l " l i f e i n t h e c a m e r a ' s l e n s w h e n h e sees a n islander " s i t t i n g m o t i o n l e s s l y o n a stone b e n c h l o o k i n g o u t t o sea, f r a m e d b y t h e d a r k outlines o f p a l m f r o n d s , " a n d speculates a b o u t w h e t h e r h e is " d r e a m i n g o f t h e p a s t , o r w o n d e r i n g a b o u t a n u n c e r t a i n f u t u r e " (62). B e l l , n e e d l e s s t o s a y , d e c i d e s t o c o n s i g n h i m t o t h e p a s t : " I left h i m t o h i s r e v e r i e , a l o n e l y r e l i c o f a f o r g o t t e n r a c e o f w a r r i o r s a n d c a n n i b a l s " (62).
26
B e l l is a m b i v a l e n t , n o n e t h e l e s s , a b o u t t h e success o f
his q u e s t i n g m i s s i o n , f e e l i n g o n t h e o n e h a n d t h a t h e h a s " d i s c o v e r e d t h a t p a r a d i s e e x i s t s i n t h e S o u t h S e a s , a n d t h a t t h e essence o f it is l o v e a m o n g p e o p l e s w h o h a v e little else t o s h a r e , " b u t o n t h e o t h e r t h a t w h a t h e h a s g l i m p s e d is " a w a y o f life w h i c h m a y s o o n b e r e m e m b e r e d o n l y i n o l d t a l e s " (318). T h e v a s t a m o u n t o f e t h n o g r a p h i c a n d t r a v e l w r i t i n g o v e r t h e last O n e a n d a h a l f centuries has diffused t h e S o u t h Seas i n t o w h i t e c o n s c i o u s n e s s as a d w i n d l i n g r e s i d u e o f h a p p y p r i m i t i v i s m a n d p a r a d i s a l i n n o c e n c e ; t r a v e l e r s c a n still e x p e r i e n c e i n t i m a t i o n s o f t h e s e states i n t h e 1990s. T h e t r o p e o f t h e b e l a t e d a r r i v a l ern travel w r i t i n g
o n e o f the staples o f m o d
is s i m p l y a s t r o n g e r f o r m o f t h e e q u a l l y u b i q u i t o u s .'ONT'„N
<>
2 7
" j u s t i n t i m e " m o t i f . C h r i s t o p h e r B o n g i e , i n Exotic Memories, t r a c e s the t r o p e b a c k t o t h e artist G a u g u i n ' s l a m e n t o v e r t h e d e a t h o f K i n g P o m a r e V in Tahiti, uncannily foreshadowing V i c t o r Segalen's arrival in t h e M a r q u e s a s just t o o late f o r a m e e t i n g w i t h G a u g u i n h i m s e l f (the painter h a d died o n l y a f e w m o n t h s before). B o n g i e finds these parallel accounts "firmly g r o u n d e d in b o t h the dichotomies o f nineteenth-cen tury exoticism a n d the fatidic pessimism t h a t . . . h a d become the pre s c r i b e d w a y o f s p e a k i n g a b o u t m a t t e r s e x o t i c " (72). C o n t e m p o r a r y t r a v e l e r s a r e still i n t h e h a b i t o f a r r i v i n g j u s t t o o l a t e . I f B e l l c a n still f i n d a n i d y l l i c S a m o a , " l e s s s p e c t a c u l a r t h a n T a h i t i , less f o r b i d d i n g t h a n t h e M a r q u e s a s , b u t w i t h a n ethereal b e a u t y o n l y a poet could c a p t u r e i n w o r d s , " i t is o n l y t o h a v e t h e i l l u s i o n p u n c t u r e d a s s o o n a s e n t e r t a i n e d : " T h e n w e t u r n e d a c o r n e r a n d f o u n d a fleet o f e x c a v a t i n g machines building a reservoir; a n d w e passed o u t o f yet a n o t h e r shrink i n g d r e a m w o r l d " (293). T h i s " s h r i n k i n g d r e a m w o r l d " t r a n s f o r m s easily into a n e x p a n d i n g apocalypse, the strongest f o r m o f S o u t h Seas disillusionment—a c o u n t e r i l l u s i o n p e r h a p s . M a n y t r a v e l e r s ' tales i n c l u d e t h e i r a u t h o r s ' repulsed descriptions o f polluted atolls, g a r b a g e - s t r e w n strands, a n d t o u r i s t - i n d u c e d v u l g a r i t i e s . F a r s t r o n g e r , h o w e v e r , a r e larger scenes o f neoimpcrial violence like M u r u r o a , the n o t o r i o u s location o f repeated F r e n c h n u c l e a r testing. Bell, S t e v e n s o n ' s p i l g r i m , reacts w i t h c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o u t r a g e , d e s c r i b i n g t h e site a s " a l a b o r a t o r y f o r m a s s d e s t r u c tion in a n illusory paradise," submerged b e l o w a l a g o o n where " a r e d a n d w h i t e d r i l l i n g r i g rises l i k e a f a i r g r o u n d h e l t e r - s k e l t e r , a n d d e e p l y t a n n e d y o u n g m e n foster the illusion o f a h o l i d a y resort b y c a v o r t i n g o n g a i l y c o l o u r e d s a i l b o a r d s " (97). F o r t h e E n g l i s h w r i t e r E v a n s , t h e l a t e s t h e a r t o f d a r k n e s s is t h e M a r s h a l l I s l a n d s , t h e c u l m i n a t i o n o f h i s j o u r n e y , w h i c h h e b e g i n s t o see as " a p e n a n c e 1 h a d i m p o s e d o n m y s e l f ' (241). F o r E v a n s , K w a j a l e i n , a n A m e r i c a n b a s e c l o s e t o w h e r e t h e r e e n t r y v e h i c l e s o f n u c l e a r w e a p o n s s p l a s h d o w n , is t h e V e n u s w h o s e " t r a n s i t " p r o v i d e s t h e quasi-novelistic basis f o r his travel b o o k . U l t i m a t e l y , E v a n s decides, t h e base resembles n o t so m u c h D a n t e ' s Inferno a s a m o r e m o d e r n s u r r e a l i t y , " a F i f t i e s s.f. m o v i e , s o m e t h i n g i n t h e t r a d i t i o n o f Fire Maidens from Space o r Robinson Crusoe on Mars" (257). D y s t o p i a s m a r k e d b y s u r r e a l i t y o r v i r t u a l r e a l i t y a r e v e r y m u c h p a r t o f t h e r e p e r t o i r e o f c o n t e m p o r a r y t r a v e l w r i t i n g (see c h a p . 4); i n t h i s specific S o u t h S e a s c o n t e x t , t h e y e n a c t a k i n d o f r e c o i l o f t h e e x o t i c , t r a n s f o r m i n g i t a n d t h r u s t i n g it t o w a r d a n a p o c a l y p t i c f u t u r e . A p o c a l y p s e m a r k s the e n d point o f w h a t A l a n M o o r h e a d has called
9(1
louuis 1
W I T H r \ I T w n 11 I K S
" t h e f a t a l i m p a c t " : t h e t i t l e o f h i s 1966 s t u d y o f " t h e i n v a s i o n o f t h e South Pacific." O v e r a c e n t u r y earlier, M e l v i l l e h a d a l r e a d y p r o v i d e d a s h a r p c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n o f " f a t a l i m p a c t " i n Typee: W h e n t h e i n h a b i t a n t s o f s o m e s e q u e s t e r e d i s l a n d first d e s c r y t h e " b i g c a n o e " o f the E u r o p e a n rolling d o w n through the blue waters t o w a r d their s h o r e s , t h e y r u s h d o w n t o t h e b e a c h in c r o w d s , a n d w i t h o p e n a r m s stand ready to e m b r a c e the strangers. F a t a l e m b r a c e ! T h e y fold t o t h e i r b o s o m s t h e v i p e r s w h o s e s t i n g is d e s t i n e d t o p o i s o n all t h e i r j o y s ; a n d t h e i n s t i n c t i v e f e e l i n g o f l o v e w i t h i n t h e i r b r e a s t s is s o o n c o n v e r t e d into the bitterest hate.
(24)
A l m o s t e v e r y travel b o o k a n d e t h n o g r a p h i c a c c o u n t since M e l v i l l e h a s implicitly accepted o r rehearsed "fatal i m p a c t , " a l t h o u g h there are sev eral d i f f e r e n t v e r s i o n s o f the thesis i n c i r c u l a t i o n . B e l l , f o r e x a m p l e , quotes ( C a p t a i n ) C o o k ' s o p i n i o n that "it w o u l d h a v e been f a r better f o r these p o o r p e o p l e n e v e r t o h a v e k n o w n o u r superiority in t h e a c c o m m o d a t i o n s a n d arts that m a k e life c o m f o r t a b l e , t h e n after o n c e k n o w i n g it, t o b e a b a n d o n e d i n t h e i r o r i g i n a l i n c a p a c i t y f o r i m p r o v e m e n t " (178). T h e c o n c l u s i o n t o C o o k ' s s e n t e n c e is s u r p r i s i n g i n its regret, n o t for the invasion b u t for subsequent a b a n d o n m e n t ; a n d t w o centuries later, w r i t i n g a b o u t the G i l b e r t s ( K i r i b a t i ) , W o o d c o c k seems to agree: the islands' "fragile balance . . . has already been destroyed, a n d n o w t h e i r r e m o t e n e s s is n o l o n g e r a p r o t e c t i o n , b u t t h e t h r e a t o f a n i s o l a t i o n t h a t c a n o n l y b e d e s t r u c t i v e " (182). T h e r o u x , f o r h i s p a r t , is well pleased w i t h t h e S o l o m o n s , naively professing o n t h e contrary " t h a t i f the people were n o t interfered w i t h b y tourists o r bureaucrats, the island w o u l d r e m a i n intact a n d the people w o u l d be able t o m a n a g e o n t h e i r o w n " (180). I f t h e t r o p e o f f a t e f u l e n c o u n t e r ( o f t e n c o m b i n e d w i t h that o f fatal a b a n d o n m e n t ) seemed a l m o s t indispensable t o earlier t r a v e l w r i t e r s , it is j u s t as m o t i v a t i n g a n d e m p o w e r i n g f o r P a c i f i c chroniclers t o d a y . These writers' commentaries implicitly a c k n o w l e d g e the v a r i o u s societies' e m p l a c e m e n t i n a w o r l d t h a t d r a w s e v e n t h e remotest islands into transnational w e b s o f trade a n d c o m m u n i c a t i o n (the so-called global village); b u t the plot o f the travel b o o k d e p e n d s o n the c o n t i n u e d revival o f a nostalgic exotic v i s i o n — a vision, as B o n g i e p o i n t s o u t , t h a t is a l w a y s a l r e a d y i n a n d o f t h e p a s t . 2 8
T h e narratives o f S o u t h S e a travelers c o m m o n l y b e c o m e p s e u d o u n l h r o p o l o g i c a l as they, l o o , a t t e m p t t o bridge gaps b e t w e e n I lie o b s e r v i n g s u b j e c t a n d ils " o t h e r s , " a n d b e t w e e n a l i v e d p r e s e n t a n d .
0/
a n irrecoverable past. O b v i o u s l y these a t t e m p t s , t h o u g h
generally
i n f o r m e d , are h a p h a z a r d l y unscientific; recent S o u t h Seas travel writ ers t y p i c a l l y a c c u m u l a t e a n e c d o t e s i n p r a i s e o f n a t i v e h o s p i t a l i t y , u s i n g t h e s e as e v i d e n c e o f t h e t r a v e r s a l o f c u l t u r a l d i f f e r e n c e . Y e t t h e s e a n e c d o t e s m a y also attest t o the trials ( o r defeats) o f i n t e r p r e t a t i o n , p o i n t i n g i n s o m e cases t o a m e a s u r e o f r e s i s t a n c e t o t h e t r a v e l e r ' s a p p a r e n t cultural mastery. T h e r o u x , for e x a m p l e , includes o n e such "resistance a n e c d o t e " i n The Happy Isles of Oceania. A f t e r s e t t i n g u p b a s e o n o n e particular
( T r o b r i a n d ) island,
Theroux
paddles
back
a n d forth
b e t w e e n t h e m , b e a r i n g gifts t h a t seem t o help h i m establish a special r a p p o r t w i t h his h o s t villagers. H o w e v e r , w h e n h e r e t u r n s t o o n e o f t h e villages f o r a farewell visit, h i s hosts are u n r e s p o n s i v e , hostile even. T h e r o u x leaves d i s a p p o i n t e d ; later, a l t h o u g h t h e villagers h a v e n o t t o l d h i m so, he speculates that a f e u d b e t w e e n his hosts a n d a n e i g h b o r i n g village m u s t h a v e d a m p e n e d the enthusiasm that h a d greeted p r e v i o u s v i s i t s . H e finally a d m i t s t o d e f e a t — " I c o u l d n o w see t h e u t t e r impossibility o f m y e v e r u n d e r s t a n d i n g the p l a c e " (150)—but n o t w i t h o u t o f f e r i n g o n e o f his characteristic p a r t i n g shots: islands w i t h " t r a d i tional" culture, h e concludes, "are riddled w i t h magic, superstition, m y t h s , d a n g e r s , rivalries, a n d [the culture's] old routines. . . . T h e k e y t o [the culture's] s u r v i v a l w a s that it l a u g h e d a t outsiders a n d k e p t t h e m a t a r m ' s l e n g t h " (150). T h e r o u x ' s h u m i l i a t i o n g a u g e s t h e c o m p l e x cultural a s y m m e t r y that often tends t o go unnoticed in W e s t e r n ( E u r o A m e r i c a n ) t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s . T h e h o s t - g u e s t c o n t r a c t , a f t e r a l l , is n e v e r o n e o f stasis o r e q u i l i b r i u m : e v e n t h e v i s i t o r w h o a d o p t s g i f t r i t u a l s w i t h w h a t s/he b e l i e v e s is i n f o r m e d s e n s i t i v i t y c a n n o t p r o f i t f r o m t h e m p r e c i s e l y b e c a u s e s/he is a c u l t u r a l o u t s i d e r ; a n d p r i v i l e g e p a s s e s b a c k a n d f o r t h , i n this w a y , b e t w e e n h o n o r e d guests a n d culturally
vigilant
2
hosts. ? E v e n t h o u g h the Pacific z o n e has failed t o s u p p l y full edenic ther a p y t o its w h i t e t r a v e l e r - w r i t e r s , it h a s c e r t a i n l y o f f e r e d t h e m r e c u p e r a tive m o m e n t s that serve to justify their trips. N o m a t t e r h o w p e r v a s i v e their stoical d i s a p p o i n t m e n t a t the islands' failure t o fulfil the paradisal d r e a m , these writers d o m a n a g e t o locate " m a g i c a l " m o m e n t s that k e e p a t least s o m e t h i n g o f t h e d r e a m a l i v e ; a n d c o n s e q u e n t l y , e v e n those readers w h o identify the Pacific with m a r k e t a b l e ( " C l u b M e d " ) i l l u s i o n s — h a p p y , childlike natives ministering t o visitors in a n a m b i e n c e o f s a n i t i z e d h e d o n i s m — k n o w t h a t a f u t u r e still e x i s t s f o r t h e S o u t h Seas travel b o o k . T h u s despite his frustrations. Bell, ever a n x ious t o experience t h e M a r q u e s a s t h r o u g h Stevenson (and >)•'•
'I 1 ' ( I K I !I I 'I
W i l l i
1.1
1 I I 11
through
m o r e t h a n j u s t S t e v e n s o n ' s e y e s ) , finds h a p p i n e s s a n d p u r i t y i n a v i l l a g e M a s s , f r a m e d b y " t w o p a l m trees . . . e t c h e d i n p e r f e c t s y m m e t r y a g a i n s t a c r i m s o n s u n s e t . " T h e i d y l l is d e s c r i b e d as f o l l o w s : [A]
thin sliver o f m o o n directly a b o v e a c h u r c h created a circle o f
b r i g h t light suffused w i t h all the c o l o u r s o f t h e r a i n b o w ; the w i n d o w s o f the c h u r c h e m a n a t e d a w a r m , r o s y g l o w ; the lilting m e l o d i e s f r o m within drifted o n the evening breeze. A m o r e exotic scene c o u l d be imagined. (71-72)
not
3 0
A n d t o c a p it, e a c h w o r s h i p e r a c c o r d s B e l l " a s m i l e a n d a f r i e n d l y bonsoir" o n l e a v i n g t h e c h u r c h (72). E v e n t h e m o r e g r u d g i n g T h e r o u x experiences serenely u n c o m p l i c a t e d m o m e n t s o f grace, as " o n o n e o f t h o s e m o o n y n i g h t s a t t h e p a v i l i o n b y t h e l a g o o n w h e n t h e bliss o f t h e s o u t h seas d r e a m w a s p a l p a b l e " (31). Nonetheless, those m o m e n t s at which the exotic becomes palpable are b y their n a t u r e evanescent, e x p u n g i n g consciousness o f alienation o n l y t o r e i n t r o d u c e it as i n e v i t a b l e r e a c t i o n . E a r l i e r " d i s c o v e r e r s , " a f t e r all, h a d i n v e n t e d the S o u t h Seas i n a self-reflexive gesture t h a t c o n s t i t u t e d a c a t e g o r y o f r u p t u r e : t h e e x o t i c as a z o n e d e f i n e d b y its d e s t r u c t i o n at the m o m e n t o f contact. I n travel writing, the S o u t h Seas exotic flickers i n its e v a n e s c e n c e u n d e r t h e s i g n o f g u i l t y a l i e n a t i o n . T h e e x o t i c z o n e a w a k e n s a sense o f a n o m i e , c o n f r o n t i n g t r a v e l e r s , a p p r o p r i a t e l y p e r h a p s , w i t h their o w n feelings o f intrusion, guilt, a n d b o r e d o m — e v e n i f those feelings a r e often projected o n t o " t o u r i s t s , " " t r a d e r s , " " b u r e a u c r a t s , " a n d t h e like. F o r E v a n s , e c h o i n g L e v i - S t r a u s s , w h i t e settlers b e t h e y p l a n t e r s , t r a d e r s , o r b e a c h c o m b e r s — " w a n t e d s o m e w h e r e . . . t o b r i n g t h e i r p s y c h o l o g i c a l b a g g a g e a n d d u m p it. . . . [ T j h e y l o n g e d f o r s o m e s u d d e n paradise to flower there, s o m e s u d d e n libera t i o n f r o m n e u r o s i s a n d d e s i r e " (148-49). B u t a s T h e r o u x n o t e s , " I t is s i m p l y n o t possible . . . t o lose y o u r s e l f i n a n e x o t i c place. M u c h m o r e l i k e l y is a n e x p e r i e n c e o f i n t e n s e n o s t a l g i a , a h a r k i n g b a c k t o a n e a r l i e r s t a g e o f y o u r l i f e , o r s e e i n g c l e a r l y a s e r i o u s m i s t a k e " (31). A r r i v i n g a t this p e r c e p t i o n , travelers experience a bitter recoil, realizing, like T h e r o u x , t h a t t h e " s a d n e s s w a s m i n e " (180); o r , l i k e E v a n s , t h a t e x o t i c s u r faces o n l y y i e l d " f l o u r i s h i n g s t a t e s o f b o r e d o m " (186); o r , l i k e W o o d c o c k , t h a t " n o s t a l g i a . . . is d a r k e n e d b y d e s p a i r " (182). S o u t h S e a s travel narratives c u l m i n a t e m o s t often in u n l i b e r a t e d w i t h d r a w a l , sug gesting that even the m o s t astute travelers inevitably project p s y c h o logical a n d c u l t u r a l deficits o n t o the places they visit, o n l y to t a k e t h o s e d e f i c i t s just as s u r e l y w i t h I h e m h o m e
ZONE
FOUR!
THE
ARCTIC
T h e m o t i f o f r e t u r n i n a n o t h e r , d i s s i m i l a r b u t still " e x o t i c "
travel
z o n e — t h e Arctic—is tied in w i t h that zone's m o s t o b v i o u s temporal a t t r i b u t e : d e f e r r a l . " T o t r a v e l i n t h e A r c t i c is t o w a i t , " s a y s t h e A m e r ican biologist
B a r r y L o p e z i n Arctic
Dreams
(1986). T h e u n p r e
dictable climate a n d shifting terrain o f the A r c t i c present travelers w i t h a stern test o f p a t i e n c e : t h e y m a y h a v e t o w a i t f o r q u i t e s o m e time before reaching their destination; again before traveling in t h e a r e a ; still m o r e b e f o r e r e t u r n i n g h o m e . T h e A r c t i c ' s i n d i g e n o u s p e o ples, i n u r e d t o their t r e a c h e r o u s e n v i r o n m e n t , k n o w w e l l h o w t o a d a p t t h e m s e l v e s t o t h e subtly c h a n g i n g r h y t h m s o f A r c t i c life; n o t so W e s t e r n travelers a n d explorers, w h o s e i m p a t i e n c e — o r
incompe
t e n c e — c a n c o s t t h e m d e a r . ( O n e o f t h e m a n y i r o n i e s o f t h e A r c t i c is t h a t w h i l e it h a s r e c e n t l y b e c o m e a d u m p i n g g r o u n d f o r t h e d e t r i t u s o f W e s t e r n [ m i l i t a r y ] t e c h n o l o g y , it is still l i t t e r e d w i t h t h e b o d i e s o f W e s t e r n t r a v e l e r s — m e n w h o t h o u g h t , mistakenly, that their technol ogy was g o o d e n o u g h . ) G i v e n the tragic history o f exploration in the A r c t i c — a history allied, o f course, t o t h e c o n t i n u i n g e x p l o i t a t i o n o f t h e A r c t i c — i t is n o t s u r p r i s i n g t h a t c o n t e m p o r a r y A r c t i c t r a v e l o g u e s should tend t o b e cautious, soul-searching affairs: narratives w h o s e halting progress affords o n e reminder after a n o t h e r o f the need t o reeducate W e s t e r n sensibilities—to
r e c o r d n o t o n l y w h a t o n e sees,
b u t a l s o h o w o n e l e a r n s t o see. Three
recent
North
A m e r i c a n travel
books—Lopez's
Arctic
Dreams, R u d y W i e b e ' s Playing Dead (1989), a n d J o h n M o s s ' s Endur ing Dreams ( 1 9 9 4 ) — m i g h t b e s t b e d e s c r i b e d a s A r c t i c
contemplations:
accounts in w h i c h description prevails o v e r narration t o t h e point w h e r e t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e , r e d u c i n g its m e t a b o l i c r a t e a s i f t o a d a p t t o its w i n t r y surroundings, hypostatizes into lyric p o e m , into crafted m e d i t a tion o n t h e motionless. T h e similarities b e t w e e n t h e three accounts o v e r r i d e t h e i r w r i t e r s ' d i f f e r e n t p r o f e s s i o n s — L o p e z is a r e s e a r c h s c i e n tist, W i e b e a f u l l - t i m e w r i t e r , M o s s a p r o f e s s o r o f E n g l i s h — t o s u g g e s t the shared c a t e g o r y o f the " A r c t i c d r e a m e r . " T h e s e writers are all fas cinated b y the phenomenological links between people a n d t h e envi ronments they explore o r inhabit. T h e i r o w n encounters w i t h the A r c tic l a n d s c a p e ( f o u r y e a r s ' r e s e a r c h i n t h e A r c t i c c i r c l e f o r L o p e z , n u m e r o u s visits t o t h e u p p e r reaches o f their C a n a d i a n h o m e l a n d f o r W i e b e a n d M o s s ) i n t u r n raise l a r g e r q u e s t i o n s a b o u t t h e h u m a n r e l a t i o n s h i p w i t h t h e l a n d . T h e s e q u e s t i o n s a r e in p u r l m e l a p h y s i c a l : h o w
Mi"
T O I I HI,vi v W I T H
'I v I ' H W I U
II-11
d o w e distinguish between t h e w o r l d " o u t there" a n d t h e world(s inside o u r heads? T h e y are also epistemological: h o w a r e w e t o " u n d e r stand" the land, through which m o d e s o f knowledge a n d perception A n d , n o t l e a s t , t h e y a r e e t h i c a l : h o w a r e w e t o " b e h a v e " t o w a r d th< l a n d , t o u s e i t w i t h o u t a b u s i n g it? T h e i s s u e is c o m p l i c a t e d f u r t h e r b y t h e s i n g u l a r e l u s i v e n e s s o f th< A r c t i c , b o t h a s ( p h y s i c a l ) l a n d s c a p e a n d as ( m e t a p h y s i c a l ) i d e a . F r e t ting a b o u t the A r c t i c ' s a p p a r e n t resistance t o verbal l a n g u a g e , M o s : c o n v e r t s h i s e x p e r i e n c e o f A r c t i c t r a v e l i n t o o n e i r i c m e t a p h o r : hi dreams the Arctic "in a language o f which I can only grasp the rough est e d g e s , e d g e s t h a t b r e a k o f f i n f r a g m e n t s w h e n 1 t o u c h t h e m " (32) F o r W i e b e , m e a n w h i l e , t h e A r c t i c is c o n s t r u e d a s a l i m i n a l e n v i r o n ment: located at the edge o f the w o r l d , suspended between water a i u l a n d ( w i t h t h e c a p a c i t y t o c h a n g e a l m o s t i m p e r c e p t i b l y f r o m o n e stall t o t h e o t h e r ) , t h e A r c t i c defies, s o m e t i m e s d e s t r o y s , t h o s e w h o are fool ish e n o u g h t o t h i n k it c h a n g e l e s s . T h e A r c t i c o c c u p i e s a v a s t s p a c e ; a m y e t , l i k e t h e p o l a r t r a v e l e r i n N e r u d a ' s p o e m ( c i t e d b y W i e b e ) , it i: p o i s e d b e t w e e n " t h e s h o r e s a n d t h e o c e a n , " its s u r f a c e " s o n a r r o v [ t h a t ] i t is n o m o r e t h a n a p o s s i b l e l i n e f o r a p o s s i b l e b a l a n c e " (115) T h e I n u i t p e o p l e s w h o p o p u l a t e t h i s h y p o t h e t i c a l r e g i o n k n o w h o w It n e g o t i a t e a n d m a i n t a i n t h e p r e c a r i o u s b a l a n c e t h e y n e e d t o ensure their o w n survival. F o r those w h o are reared o n the discriminator) classifications o f W e s t e r n science, t h e t a s k o f u n d e r s t a n d i n g t h e A r c t i c — k n o w i n g h o w t o l i v e w i t h it, a s w e l l a s w i t h i n i t — i s a l l t h e g r e a t e r F o r as a l l t h r e e w r i t e r s s h o w , t h e A r c t i c h a s h i s t o r i c a l l y s c o r n e d W e s t e r n p r e t e n s i o n s t o c o n t r o l a n d c o n t a i n it. O v e r s p i l l i n g t h e b o u n d a r i e s t h a t s c i e n t i s t s h a v e s o u g h t t o i m p o s e o n it, t h e A r c t i c is a p t t o c o n f o u n d e v e n t h e m o s t m e t i c u l o u s o b s e r v e r s , r e m i n d i n g t h e m o f t h e gat; t h a t s e p a r a t e s w h a t t h e y see f r o m w h a t t h e y wish t o see. L o o m i n g particularly large in the s y m b o l i s m o f L o p e z ' s , W i e b c ' s a n d M o s s ' s n a r r a t i v e s a r e t h e c r u c i f o r m m a s t s o f J o h n F r a n k l i n ' s l.wi s h i p s , Erebus a n d Terror, w h i c h r a n a g r o u n d o n t h e ice d u r i n g h i s t h i n ( a n d final) e x p e d i t i o n t o t h e A r c t i c i n 1845. A s L o p e z e x p l a i n s F r a n k l i n ' s i l l - f a t e d e x p e d i t i o n q u i c k l y t o o k o n m y t h i c p r o p o r t i o n s , lit l e a d e r e m e r g e d as a n a l m o s t m e s s i a n i c figure, a m a n w h o s e h e r o i c selfs a c r i f i c e w a s t o d e l i v e r his c o u n t r y m e n f r o m t h a i f a t a m o r g a n a o f A r c tic n a v i g a t i o n : a N o r t h w e s t P a s s a g e D i a l led o u t b e y o n d t h e u p p e r A r c lie l o t h e s i l k s a n d spices o f t h e L a s t . F r a n k l i n ' s c a t a s l r o p h u expedition d i d not put a n c u d , h o w e v e r , to A n t i c exploration. O n llu contrary: "N|f.N
i"l
S c o r e s o f e x p e d i t i o n s set o u t f r o m E n g l a n d a n d A m e r i c a t o search the entire u n e x p l o r e d C a n a d i a n a r c h i p e l a g o if necessary. . . . W h e r e o n c e the g o a l [of A r c t i c exploration] h a d b e e n to get
through
en r o u t e
to s o m e w h e r e else, n o w expeditions were p r o p o s e d . . . to m a k e the r e g i o n itself the f o c u s o f their attention.
. . . F r o m this [collective]
e n t e r p r i s e c a m e , i r o n i c a l l y , t h e first e x t e n s i v e a n d a c c u r a t e m a p s o f the high Arctic.
(363)
L o n g after the British a n d t h e A m e r i c a n s h a d pulled their ships o u t o f the A r c t i c — s h i p s t h a t h a d g o n e there, i n several cases, i n search o f t h e lucrative reward that awaited F r a n k l i n ' s "discovery"—expeditions s u c h as F r a n k l i n ' s w e r e t o k e e p t h e i r h o l d o n t h e p o p u l a r i m a g i n a t i o n , "in the m i n d s o f scholars a n d poets, in the perceptions o f travellers, the s e n s i b i l i t y o f e v e r y o u t s i d e r w h o h o l d s t h e A r c t i c l a n d s c a p e as a n o p t i o n a l reality i n i m a g i n a t i o n , a n d a m o n g the bibliographies o f A r c tic d r e a m i n g " ( M o s s 96 97). F r a n k l i n h e l p e d t o p r o v i d e w h a t L o p e z calls a " l e g a c y o f d e s i r e " i n A r c t i c h i s t o r y : t h e d e s i r e o f " i n d i v i d u a l m e n t o achieve their goals," b u t also o n e " t h a t transcends heroics a n d was p r i v a t e l y k n o w n t o m a n y — t h e desire f o r a safe a n d h o n o r a b l e p a s s a g e t h r o u g h t h e w o r l d " (309). L o p e z , W i e b e , a n d M o s s thus all i n c o r p o r a t e F r a n k l i n ' s expedition into a larger, spiritual quest: o n e in w h i c h W e s t e r n travelers, r e m i n d e d o f the limitations o f their k n o w l e d g e , a n d chastened against the dangers o f c u l t u r a l a r r o g a n c e , set o u t t o ( r e ) d i s c o v e r t h e p r i m o r d i a l n a t u r e o f t h e i r r e l a t i o n s h i p w i t h t h e w o r l d . T h i s u n d e r s t a n d i n g r e q u i r e s a sense o f reciprocity with the land, a n appreciation that the various landscapes t h r o u g h w h i c h travelers m o v e , o r u p o n w h i c h t h e y are m o v e d t o c o n t e m p l a t e , are t o b e seen " n o t solely [as] areas o f h u m a n i n v e n t i o n " b u t as " c r u c i b l e s o f m y s t e r y " ( L o p e z 412). I n s t e a d o f i m p o s i n g t h e m s e l v e s o n t h e l a n d , m o l d i n g it t o t h e i r e x p e c t a t i o n s o r a l t e r i n g its d i m e n s i o n s t o fit t h e s h a p e o f t h e i r d r e a m s , t r a v e l e r s m u s t l e a r n s o m e h o w t o m e r g e w i t h t h e l a n d , t o s u r r e n d e r i n silence t o its i m m a n e n t m y s t e r i e s . F o r M o s s , t o " e n t e r " t h e l a n d s c a p e i n t h i s s p i r i t is t o a b o l i s h its t h r e a t o f alienation: " Y o u m a y enter landscape, b u t i n humility; i f truly there, y o u c a n n o t tell y o u r s e l f a p a r t f r o m i t " (5). S u c h m o m e n t s o f m y s t i c a l convergence are rare, b u t invariably epiphanic: hence L o p e z , w a l k i n g one night o n the t u n d r a , trading inquisitive b u t respectful glances w i t h the birds while the "serene A r c t i c l i g h t . . . c a m e d o w n o v e r the land like breath, like b r e a t h i n g " ( x x ) ; o r W i e b e , also o n the tundra., seeking c o m m u n i o n w i t h t h e " p r i m e v a l e a r t h " i n a l a n d s c a p e that r e a c h e s o u t t o h i m " l i k e I h e k n o b b y p a h n o f ( J o d ' s h a n d " (113).
in,
1
1 M I M S ' l ' . w i 111 1 1 r i . W H i 1 i i " '
A c c o r d i n g t o M o s s , t o o m a n y writers o n the A r c t i c h a v e dispos sessed t h e I n u i t , " m a k i n g t h e m i n t r u d e r s " a n d d e n y i n g " n a t i v e k i n s h i p w i t h t h e l a n d " (75). C o n s e q u e n t l y , a n y s e a r c h f o r r e c i p r o c i t y w i t h the l a n d also entails a quest f o r reconciliation
w i t h its i n d i g e n o u s
i n h a b i t a n t s . W i e b e r e c o g n i z e s t h a t i f h e is t o u n d e r s t a n d t h e A r c t i c i f t h e A r c t i c is t o r e v e a l s o m e o f its secrets t o h i m — t h e n h e m u s t , l i k e his p r e d e c e s s o r V i h j a l m u r S t e f a n s s o n , l e a r n t o " t h i n k like [the] I n u i t " (107). L o p e z , o n t h e o t h e r h a n d , c a n n o t s e p a r a t e t h i n k i n g f r o m s e e i n g ; h e seeks t o r e c a p t u r e t h e " n a t i v e e y e " : t h e k e e n - s i g h t e d n e s s o f a p e o ple w h o , a w a r e o f the " v a g u e s t flutter o f life" i n a n e n v i r o n m e n t that m i g h t otherwise seem "featureless a n d interminable," are gifted with " a p r e d a t o r ' s a l e r t n e s s f o r m i n u t i a e , f o r r e v e a l i n g d e t a i l " (96). T h e A r c t i c is a n e n v i r o n m e n t t h a t n o t o n l y r e w a r d s s u c h " p r e t e r n a t u r a l l y h e i g h t e n e d a w a r e n e s s " (202), it r e q u i r e s it. N o n e o f t h e w r i t e r s is SI) i n g e n u o u s as t o suggest t h a t t h e W e s t e r n i z a t i o n o f the A r c t i c h a s n o t b r o u g h t w i t h it c e r t a i n m a t e r i a l a d v a n t a g e s t o I n u i t p e o p l e s ' l i v e s , b u t t h e y w a r n against t h e a t r o p h y i n g o f spatial awareness that a reliance on machines a n dmechanized modes o f transportation m a y inadver tently p r o d u c e . I n their cautious efforts t o rehabilitate I n u i t culture a c u l t u r e t h a t , a s H u g h B r o d y h a s r e m i n d e d u s , still s u f f e r s f r o m t h e 3
s u b o r d i n a t i n g practices o f W e s t e r n c o l o n i a l i s m ' — t h e y point o u t the benefits p r o v i d e d b y traditional
Inuit technologies. W i e b e d e m o n
strates, f o r e x a m p l e , h o w " I n u i t travel t e c h n o l o g y a n d their t w o d i m e n s i o n a l u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f space, b o t h o f w h i c h were taught I hem b y the a w e s o m e landscape in which they h a v e learned to live" (.m), c a n b e u s e d t o e x p l a i n t h e success o f F r a n k l i n ' s first e x p e d i t i o n t o the A r c t i c i n 1819-22. I n u i t t r a c k i n g t e c h n i q u e s , s a y s W i e b e , d e p e n d o n t h e p e r c e i v e d (.lis U n c t i o n between " a r e a l " a n d " l i n e a r " dimensions o f space. In Itiuklitut, says W i e b e (via t h e linguist R a y m o n d G a g n e ) , A l l visible p h e n o m e n a . . . are v i e w e d t w o - d i m e n s i o n a l l y . M o r e o v e r , all o f t h e m fall into t w o basic categories: first, those o f r o u g h l y e q u a l d i m e n s i o n s , such as a ball, a n igloo . .. o r a n ice surface; a n d second, those that are o r a p p e a r t o b e o f u n e q u a l d i m e n s i o n s , . . such as a h a r p o o n . . . a rope . . . o r a river. ( Q t d . in W i e b e 15) A n o b j e c t classified as a r e a l ( a b a l l ) m a y b e c o m e l i n e a r w h e n il is in m o t i o n (a r o l l i n g b a l l ) . W h e n h u m a n b e i n g s m o v e , I h e y l o o c h a n g e f r o m being areal t o linear ( 1 5 ) .
Imiii 1 racking techniques aic based o n
a n u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e s e t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s lis w e l l as o n a c a l c u l a t i o n
o f the intersection o f linear routes: these w e r e the techniques that s a v e d Franklin's (grounded) expedition. Franklin's third expedition, h o w ever, w a s n o t so l u c k y . A s W i e b e e x p l a i n s : A
ship frozen in the ice has m o v e d o u t o f the linear into
another
d i m e n s i o n a l t o g e t h e r : i n t h e v a s t A r c t i c it h a s a c h i e v e d t h e d i m e n s i o n o f a r e a l stillness. . . . a d i m e n s i o n w h i c h s a i l o r s e x p e r i e n c e d o n l y in the endless, u n b u r d e n e d m o t i o n o f the sea, c a n n o t understand.
Still
n e s s d e s t r o y s t h e m . (117)
A n d it d i d : n o t a single m e m b e r o f F r a n k l i n ' s e x p e d i t i o n a r y p a r t y sur vived. I n a sense, L o p e z , W i e b e , a n d M o s s w r i t e travel b o o k s that t h e m selves b e c o m e " i c e b o u n d , " m e t a m o r p h o s i n g f r o m n a r r a t i v e s o f m o v e ment into meditations o n immobility. B u t immobility, in the Arctic, can m e a n m a n y different things. W i e b e , f o r e x a m p l e , distinguishes b e t w e e n the potential benefits o f a p p a r e n t m o t i o n l e s s n e s s — t h e a d v a n tage g a i n e d , in c o n f r o n t i n g p r e d a t o r s , o f " p l a y i n g d e a d " — a n d the dis astrous consequence o f enforced i m m o b i l i z a t i o n : the impotent aware n e s s o f o n e ' s o w n e n t r a p m e n t . A f u r t h e r d i s t i n c t i o n is m a d e b y L o p e z , f o r w h o m ( c l i m a t i c ) stillness is n o t t o b e c o n f u s e d w i t h ( b i o l o g i c a l ) s t a sis. T h e r o m a n t i c n o t i o n o f a " t i m e l e s s " I n u i t c u l t u r e , s a y s L o p e z , h a s less t o d o w i t h g e o g r a p h i c a l k n o w l e d g e t h a n w i t h c u l t u r a l p r e j u d i c e ; s u c h p r e j u d i c e s w e r e , a n d t o s o m e e x t e n t still a r e , n u r t u r e d b y s t e r e o t y p i c a l W e s t e r n v i e w s o f t h e A r c t i c as a " p r i m i t i v e l a n d s c a p e , a p a i n t i n g i n h a b i t e d b y a t t e n u a t e d p e o p l e " (352). N i n e t e e n t h - c e n t u r y e x p l o r ers i n t h e A r c t i c o f t e n " m i s t o o k t h e stillness a n d t h e c o l d f o r b i o l o g i c a l stasis. T h e y t h o u g h t n o t h i n g a t a l l c h a n g e d [ i n t h e A r c t i c ] .
They
t h o u g h t it w a s a d e s e r t , a w a s t e l a n d " (382). S u c h a t t i t u d e s , s a y s L o p e z , b e t r a y e d a colonial sensibility: a sensibility, needless t o say, b y n o m e a n s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e n i n e t e e n t h c e n t u r y . B y e n v i s i o n i n g t h e A r c t i c as a tabula rasa, a blank white page, nineteenth-century explorers ( a n d s o m e o f their twentieth-century counterparts) were able t o inscribe u p o n it the e x p a n s i o n i s t i m p e r a t i v e s o f their o w n " e n l i g h t e n e d " cul t u r e . Y e t a s L o p e z s h o w s , it is a w h o l l y d i f f e r e n t k i n d o f a n t i c i p a t i o n t h a t t h e A r c t i c calls f o r ; t o c o n t e m p l a t e t h e stillness o f t h e A r c t i c is n o t t o p r e f i g u r e o n e ' s o w n i m p a c t u p o n it, n o r y e t t o i m a g i n e o n e ' s m o v e m e n t t h r o u g h o r b e y o n d it, b u t r a t h e r t o a p p r e c i a t e i t s own p o t e n t i a l f o r m o v e m e n t . F a r f r o m b e i n g lifeless o r m o n o t o n o u s , t h e e c o s y s t e m o f I h e A r c t i c , l i k e t h a t o f t h e d e s e r t , is c o m p l e x a n d v a r i e d : it a l l o w s n o t o n l y f o r c h a n g e , b u t f o r s i g n i f i c a n t c h a n g e ; n o t o n l y f o r life, b u t f o r 1
1
I
C M o n . 1 \ W | I II IV l - l ' W l ' I 1 1 1 •
a b u n d a n t l i f e . S t i l l n e s s i n t h e A r c t i c , as i n t h e d e s e r t , c o n n o t e s n o t s t a sis b u t d e f e r r a l — i n t h e o s c i l l a t i n g e c o s y s t e m , " l o n g stillnesses [ a r c ] b r o k e n b y s u d d e n m o v e m e n t " (175-76). I t is t r u e , a s L o p e z c o n c e d e s , that vast expanses o f t h e A r c t i c a r e , t o all intents a n d purposes, " e m p t y " ; b u t t h e A r c t i c a l s o c o n t a i n s w i t h i n it c o n c e n t r a t e d p o c k e t s o f life—pockets that, once discovered, a m p l y r e w a r d the patience o f the traveler o r ( i n L o p e z ' s case) the visiting research biologist. Arctic Dreams r e c o r d s t h e s e e x c i t i n g d i s c o v e r i e s : its s t r u c t u r e , l i k e its s u b j e c t , e n a c t s a series o f " l o n g s t i l l n e s s e s " p u n c t u a t e d b y i n s t a n c e s o f " s u d d e n m o v e m e n t . " I t is s i g n i f i c a n t , h o w e v e r , t h a t L o p e z c o n s i s tently d o w n p l a y s h i s o w n m o v e m e n t s . W e are g i v e n little i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t h o w h e g e t s f r o m p l a c e t o a n o t h e r , still less a b o u t t h e l e n g t h o f t i m e it takes h i m t o g e t there. I n o n e sense, this m a k e s f o r a f r a g m e n t e d , d i s c o n t i n u o u s n a r r a t i v e ; i n a n o t h e r , it c r e a t e s t h e i l l u s i o n o f s i m u l t a n e o u s experience. M o s s also suggests as m u c h w h e n h e reports—in o n e o f his free-verse interludes—the w o r d s o f his Iiuik h o s t , w h o " s p o k e o f A r c t i c p l a c e s / as i f t i m e w e r e n o t h i n g p a s s i n g / a n d a n y t h i n g t h a t h a p p e n e d h a p p e n s s t i l l " (91). T h i s i l l u s i o n m i g h t easily l e n d itself t o r o m a n t i c cliches a b o u t the timelessness o f " p r i m i l i v e " c u l t u r e s , b u t L o p e z , i n p a r t i c u l a r , m a n i p u l a t e s it s k i l l f u l l y l o s u e gest t h e p e r c e i v e d t o t a l i t y o f t h e A r c t i c l i f e w o r l d . L o p e z casts h i m s e l f as a n o b s e r v e r o f t h i s p h e n o m e n a l l i f e w o r l d , b u t h a r d l y a n e u t r a l o r d e t a c h e d o n e . A n x i o u s n o t t o o v e r b u r d e n us w i t h his o w n p e r s o n a l i t y (as M o s s s o m e t i m e s s e e m s t o d o ) , L o p e z r e m a i n s a w a r e , n o n e t h e l e s s , t h a t h i s p e r s o n a l i t y i n e v i t a b l y i m p i n g e s o n t h e e n v i r o n m e n t h e is d e s c r i b i n g . B u t d e s c r i p t i o n , f o r L o p e z as f o r M o s s , is n o t a n a c t o f d i s i n t e r e s t e d d o c u m e n t a t i o n ; it is a g e s t u r e , r a t h e r , o f ( u n f u l f i l l e d ) desire. In M e x i c o , f a r r e m o v e d f r o m t h e A r c t i c , M o s s m a k e s notes that are " s o u v e n i r s o f c o n t e m p l a t i o n a n d d e s i r e " (24). S i m i l a r l y , d e s i r e t r a n s lates t h e d i s t a n c e s t h a t s e p a r a t e L o p e z f r o m t h e A r c t i c , a n d t h a t d i v i d e L o p e z ' s culture f r o m the indigenous culture(s) o f the Inuit, into imag i n e d lines o f c o m m u n i c a t i o n . L o p e z r e c o g n i z e s t h e p a r a d o x : ( h e m o r e he w i s h e s t o e s t a b l i s h c o n t a c t w i t h t h e A r c t i c , t h e m o r e h e b e c o m e s a w a r e o f his o w n " f o r e i g n n e s s . " W i s e l y , h e d e c i d e s t o s t a y b e h i n d t h e scenes, a l l o w i n g the A r c t i c ' s w i l d l i f e t o t a k e center stage. T h a t w i l d l i f e is p r o l i f i c , b u l a l s o p r o d i g i o u s l y m o b i l e : in L o p e z ' s t r a v e l w r i t i n g , it m a y n o t a l w a y s b e t h e a n i m a l s w h o d o ( h e t r a v e l i n g , , b u t il is t h e a n i m a t s w h o i n v a r i a b l y gel t h e c r e d i t f o r d o i n g i 1. 3 3
is
It is n o t o n l y t h e m o b i l i t y o f A r c t i c a n i m a l s i h n l I . o p e / a d m i r e s , il a l s o ( h e i r <|iialilv
'
1 1
1
a n e n v i r o n m e n t " m a r k e d b y n a t u r a l c a t a s t r o p h e " (33). W i t h i n t h i s e c o s y s t e m , a n i m a l s s u c h as t h e m u s k o x a n d t h e p o l a r b e a r a r e t h e v e r y " i m a g e o f v u l n e r a b i l i t y " (118). A f t e r a n a f t e r n o o n s p e n t w a t c h i n g m u s k o x e n o n t h e p l a i n , L o p e z is m o v e d t o t h e f o l l o w i n g o b s e r v a t i o n : " T h e y were s o intensely g o o d a t being precisely w h a t they were. T h e longer y o u watched, the m o r e intricately they seemed a part o f where they were living, o f w h a t they were doing. T h e i r color, the proportions against the contours o f the land, were exquisite. . . . T h e y were, in evo l u t i o n ' s t e r m s , i n n o c e n t o f us a n d o f o u r p l a n s " (75). T h e b i o l o g i s t d o u bles a s m o r a l i s t , as a e s t h e t e : t h e p a g e s o f Arctic Dreams a r e c r o w d e d w i t h rhapsodic h o m a g e s t o a n unself-conscious, threatened b e a u t y — a b e a u t y threatened, a b o v e all, b y the invasive presence o f people. L o p e z cites t h e case o f t h e b e a r s a t C h u r c h i l l , M a n i t o b a , " i n n o c e n t " v i c t i m s o f a "parade o f amateur a n d professional photographers, filmmakers a n d television personnel [ w h o bait the] bears w i t h jars o f m a y o n n a i s e [ w h i l e ] i m p o r t u n i n g ] C h u r c h i l l p e o p l e t o assist t h e m i n s t a g i n g v a r i o u s s c e n e s " (115). T h e b e a r s r e p r e s e n t a s a d e x a m p l e o f " a n a n i m a l i n a c o m p a r a t i v e l y accelerated rate o f e v o l u t i o n a r y d e v e l o p m e n t [that] h a s e n c o u n t e r e d a n o t h e r creature e v o l v i n g a t a v e r y m u c h higher rate o f c h a n g e " (n6). T h e d i s t i n c t i o n m a k e s s o u n d s c i e n t i f i c s e n s e , b u t L o p e z ' s p o i n t is a b o v e a l l a n e t h i c a l o n e ; t h e " i n n o c e n c e " o f A r c t i c w i l d l i f e , a n d o f t h e e n v i r o n m e n t i n w h i c h it c o n t i n u e s t o l i v e — i f n o t always t h r i v e — p r o v i d e s h i m w i t h a necessary c o u n t e r p a r t t o t h e (lib e r a l ) w h i t e m a n ' s g u i l t . T h e A r c t i c c a n b e seen i n t h i s sense as a c o n f e s s i o n a l site f o r t h e u n b u r d e n i n g o f a t r o u b l e d c o n s c i e n c e . Y e t it is a l s o the repository o f a "transcendent" w i s d o m , a w i s d o m that brings w i t h it t h e h o p e f o r b o t h i n d i v i d u a l a n d c o l l e c t i v e r e d e m p t i o n . T h e A r c t i c , s a y s L o p e z , h a s a " p e r v a s i v e s p i r i t u a l p r e s e n c e " (124); it is i n v e s t e d w i t h a m y s t i c a l p o w e r t h a t is f r e q u e n t l y d i m i n i s h e d o r c o m p r o m i s e d i n W e s t e r n i n d u s t r i a l i z e d societies. A s a s a n c t i f i e d s p a c e , t h e A r c t i c p r o vides a splendid o p p o r t u n i t y f o r beatific c o n t e m p l a t i o n : L o p e z , birdw a t c h i n g o n e d a y a m o n g t h e ice floes, a n d " h a l f - a w a r e o f t h e b i o l o g i cal m y s t e r i e s i n p l a c i d , d e p t h l e s s w a t e r s , " p e r m i t s h i m s e l f , w i t h o u t a p p a r e n t i r o n y , t o feel " b l e s s e d " (124). E l s e w h e r e , m u s k o x e n g r a z i n g o n t h e A l a s k a n t u n d r a a r e " l i k e B u d d h i s t m o n k s " (54); a n d i c e b e r g s o f f B e l l e Isle p r e s e n t , l i k e " P o t a l a P a l a c e a t L h a s a i n T i b e t , a m o u n t a i n o u s a r c h i t e c t u r e o f ascetic c o n t e m p l a t i o n " (206). T h e A r c t i c is, i n d e e d , a l i m i n a l e n v i r o n m e n t , a n d the line separating inspired lyricism f r o m e a r n e s t s e n t e n t i o u s n e s s is a t h i n o n e , T h e A r c t i c , as a l i m i n a l z o n e , inspires
(mi,
M i l i u m s
wi 1
n
1,
IK.III
WICK
ri'WHITIttl'
.MIL
M o s s in
their turn t o a s o m e w h a t p o n d e r o u s oracularity a b o u t s u b o r d i n a t i n g "speech" t o "experience." F o r M o s s , the "greatest A r c t i c narrative w a s s i l e n c e " (56), m o r e s p e c i f i c a l l y t h e silence o f e x p l o r e r J o h n H o r n b y , w h o p e r i s h e d i n t h e A r c t i c i n 1927. U n l i k e s e v e r a l o t h e r d o o m e d e x p l o r e r s , H o r n b y left n o w o r d s b e h i n d : " H e [ r e f u s e d ] t o e x t r i c a t e h i s d r e a m s f r o m the landscape, t o enter w i t h w o r d s the c o n t i n u u m o f his t o r y a n d g e o g r a p h y , c u l t u r e a n d k i n d r e d c o n s c i o u s n e s s " (56). M o s s r e a d s H o r n b y ' s silence as i n d e x i n g t h e A r c t i c i t s e l f as l i m i n a l t e r r i t o r y : "it is t h e a b s e n c e o f v o i c e t h a t m a k e s H o r n b y ' s v i s i o n t h e i n e l u c t a b l e limit f o r others, w r i t i n g o f their o w n a d v e n t u r e s t o t h e edges o f t h e s a m e t e r r i t o r y " (56). I n Playing Dead, t o o , W i e b e p r e s e n t s a n A r c t i c t h a t c o n d u c t s t o silence a n d stillness: W h a t I e n c o u n t e r here in the N o r t h , where 1 h a v e o f necessity c o m e to l o o k , are secrets; enigmas; mysteries. . . . [ W ] a l k i n g alone in this e n o r m o u s landscape . . . I a m steadily rendered m o r e a n d m o r e w o r d less. O n e c o u l d so easily, o n e p e r h a p s m u s t o f necessity b e c o m e a motionless d o t o f stillness. E x p e r i e n c e the d a y a n d night a n d n o o n a n d sun a n d the imperceptible t u r n o f the stars. (113) A t m o m e n t s l i k e t h e s e , t h e A r c t i c is c o n s c r i p t e d i n t o t h e s e r v i c e o f a r e d e m p t i v e allegory; e m p t y i n g itself o f s p e e c h — t h e Z e n concept o f satori c o m e s t o m i n d — A r c t i c travelogue pares d o w n t o h u m a n i s t parable ( L o p e z ) , metaphysical meditation ( M o s s ) , o r devotional p o e m (Wiebe). Arctic Dreams, Playing Dead, a n d Enduring Dreams a l l o p e r a t e w i t h i n t h e t r a d i t i o n o f t r a v e l w r i t i n g as r e t r o s p e c t i v e p i l g r i m a g e , a l t h o u g h M o s s ' s b o o k — t h e m o s t recent o f the t h r e e — e m b e d s records o f pilgrimage in layers o f self-conscious m e m o i r , c o m m o n p l a c e , j o u r nal, a n d criticism o f previous A r c t i c travel narratives. S u c h records, a c c o r d i n g t o E r i c L e e d , effect " c h a n g e s i n t h e c h a r a c t e r o f t h e t r a v e l e r that a r e . . . a n a l o g o u s t o a cleansing, t h e reduction o f the purified e n t i t y t o its s m a l l e s t , t r u e s t d i m e n s i o n s " (11). A s L o p e z s u g g e s t s , m a n y W e s t e r n e x p l o r e r s a n d t r a v e l e r s h a v e p e r c e i v e d t h e A r c t i c a s a site o f b o t h t h r e a t a n d s a l v a t i o n , as a n a r e n a f o r t h e p l a y i n g o u t o f p u r g a t o r ial m y t h . T h e j o u r n e y s o f L o p e z , W i e b e , a n d M o s s a r e n o t , o f c o u r s e , p ' u r g a t o r i a l i n its l i t e r a l s e n s e ; b u t i n t h e i r d e s c r i p t i o n s o f e a r l i e r A r c t i c e x p e d i t i o n s , as in their a t t e m p t s t o c o m e t o terms w i t h their o w n limi t a t i o n s a n d w e a k n e s s e s , all t h r e e w r i t e r s g o s o m e w a y t o w a r d l o c a t i n g I he A r c t i c a s a n a g o n i s t i c s p a c e as a site o f p s y c h i c c o n f l i c t a n d m e t a p h y s i c a l i n v e s t i g a t i o n that d e m a n d s a c c o u n t a b i l i t y f o r h u m a n e r r o r ,
• 1
• •
HI/
and f o r " t h e darkness n o t only in one's o w nculture b u t within o n e s e l f ( L o p e z 413). T o p l a c e t o o m u c h e m p h a s i s o n t h e " d a r k s i d e " o f t h e s e b o o k s w o u l d b e m i s l e a d i n g , t h o u g h , f o r all three a r e p r i m a r i l y celebra t o r y o f t h e l a n d s a n d p e o p l e s t h e y d e s c r i b e . I n e a c h c a s e , t h e A r c t i c is presented as a t r e a c h e r o u s , b u t n o t necessarily hostile, e n v i r o n m e n t . T h e e n t h u s i a s m that energizes all o f these narratives derives f r o m their writers'
determination
to project
onto the Arctic landscape
their
u n s h a k a b l e f a i t h i n life. C l e a r l y , L o p e z , W i e b e , a n d M o s s all feel a d e e p a f f i l i a t i o n w i t h t h e A r c t i c . T h e y see it, i n Y i - F u T u a n ' s t e r m s , a s a " t o p o p h i l i c " s p a c e — o n e t o w h i c h t h e y a r e c o m p u l s i v e l y a t t r a c t e d , less o u t o f a sense o f a f f e c t i o n , p e r h a p s , t h a n o u t o f a sense o f a d m i r a t i o n t h a t b o r d e r s o n awe.
3 5
T h e A r c t i c t h u s t a k e s o n t h e a u r a o f t h e r o m a n t i c s u b l i m e : as
L o p e z says, in the A r c t i c t h e l a n d w o r k s its w a y i n t o t h e m a n . . . . [It] b e c o m e s l a r g e , a l i v e l i k e a n a n i m a l ; it h u m b l e s h i m i n a w a y h e c a n n o t p r o n o u n c e .
It is n o t
t h a t t h e l a n d i s s i m p l y b e a u t i f u l b u t t h a t it is p o w e r f u l . I t s
power
d e r i v e s f r o m t h e t e n s i o n b e t w e e n its o b v i o u s b e a u t y a n d i t s c a p a c i t y t o t a k e life. Its p o w e r
flows
into the m i n d from a realization o f h o w
d a r k n e s s a n d l i g h t a r e b o u n d t o g e t h e r w i t h i n it, a n d t h e f e e l i n g t h a t t h i s is t h e f l o o r o f c r e a t i o n . ( 3 9 2 - 9 3 )
O n a level t h a t is m o r e a f h T i a t i v e b u t a l s o m o r e a b s t r a c t , M o s s d e c l a r e s that intimations o f a n o t h e r w o r l d shape the d r e a m e r d r e a m i n g , the writer writing; desires;
we
separate
from
in m e t a m o r p h o s i s
psychological or
visionary
realities,
conceit
metaphysical
w e see
ourselves,
infinite a n d eternal, s h a d o w s w i t h o u t p e o p l e , b e l o n g i n g to the scape.
land
(128)
B o t h o f these passages speak w i t h eloquence a n d sincerity, a n d y e t they invite a degree o f d o u b t . T h e i r respective writers clearly h a v e experi e n c e a n d k n o w l e d g e o f t h e A r c t i c , b u t t h e y a r e still, i n t h e e n d , visitors—travelers
w h o s e actions a n d observations are based o n the
k n o w l e d g e that their stays in the A r c t i c will be t e m p o r a r y . " F o r a rela tionship w i t h t h e land t o be lasting," says L o p e z , "it m u s t b e recipro c a l " (404). B u t w h i l e L o p e z m a y g e s t u r e t o w a r d s u c h r e c i p r o c i t y , h e c a n n o t achieve t h e lasting r e l a t i o n s h i p w i t h t h e A r c t i c h e desires. W h i l e a w a r d i n g L o p e z generous praise, M o s s concedes grandiloquently
somewhat
t h a t " t h e A r c t i c b e c o m e s a n o u r i s h o n (lie m a r g i n o f
the chart o f the writer's c o n t e m p l a t i o n o f himself" ( y j ) , < ininlcd. but
to w h a t degree does M o s s ' s A r c t i c b e c o m e m o r e central, m o r e fully a subject? S u c h p r o b l e m s i n e v i t a b l y arise f r o m the c o n t r a d i c t i o n s e m b o d i e d i n t r a v e l w r i t i n g as a g e n r e ; f o r w h i l e t r a v e l w r i t i n g — o f t h e s y m p a t h e t i c k i n d , a t least, t h a t L o p e z , W i e b e , a n d M o s s p r a c t i c e — attempts to bridge the gaps b e t w e e n different peoples, places, a n d cul tures, these are gaps t h a t the genre itself c a n n o t h e l p b u t create. T r a v e l w r i t i n g r e i n s t a l l s d i f f e r e n c e e v e n as it c l a i m s t o d i s m a n t l e it; t h e h u m a n i s t desire for reconciliation, in k e e p i n g w i t h the desire for a m o r e p e r m a n e n t relationship w i t h the land, tends to f o u n d e r o n the very (socioeconomic) conditions that m a k e travel w r i t i n g possible. Travelers' economic p o w e r enables them to mobilize resources—the same p o w e r allows t h e m b o t h to leave a n d , eventually, to return. A n d because travelers c a n "see h o m e w h i l e d i s t a n c i n g [themselves] f r o m it" (Fraser xvii), the writing that they produce tends to be paradoxically e t h n o c e n t r i c . T h e h u m a n i s t s y m p a t h i e s o f t r a v e l w r i t i n g d i s g u i s e its interested m o t i v a t i o n s — i t s ( r e ) p r o d u c t i o n o f the w o r l d for a W e s t e r n m e t r o p o l i t a n a u d i e n c e ( P r a t t 5). L o p e z , W i e b e , a n d M o s s are well aware, o f course, o f travel writ i n g ' s c a p a c i t y f o r d i s s i m u l a t i o n , a n d t h e y all a t t e m p t t o d i s t a n c e t h e m selves f r o m t h e g e n r e ' s a c c e p t e d c o n v e n t i o n s . T h e i r A r c t i c c o n t e m p l a tions c o n t a i n f e w o f the elements w e m i g h t usually associate w i t h travel w r i t i n g , a l t h o u g h t h e y still r e m a i n a n i d e n t i f i a b l e s u b g e n r e o f c o n t e m p o r a r y travel literature. ( I f , as P a u l F u s s e l l s u g g e s t s [see i n t r o d u c tion], travel w r i t i n g c a n b e located at the interface b e t w e e n W e s t e r n picaresque a n d p a s t o r a l t r a d i t i o n s , t h e n the A r c t i c c o n t e m p l a t i o n falls s q u a r e l y i n t o t h e c a t e g o r y o f t h e l a t t e r : its m o t i v a t i o n s , l i k e t h o s e o f pastoral, are to restore a n ideal relationship w i t h the land.) A l l three writers are " A r c t i c d r e a m e r s , " p r o j e c t i n g their i n d i v i d u a l desires a n d the collective l o n g i n g s o f their cultures o n t o t h e i n d i g e n o u s l a n d s c a p e . T h e i r b o o k s bear t e s t i m o n y to the impossible aspiration to b e c o m e i n d i g e n o u s t o t h e A r c t i c : t o its p l a c e s , p e o p l e s , a n d c u l t u r e s . T h e y u s e t h e " o p e n , u n o b s t r u c t e d s p a c e s " ( L o p e z 200) t o e x e r c i s e r e f l e c t i o n ; t o escape f r o m " [ g e o g r a p h e r s w i t h w r y m a p parodies o f the e a r t h " ( M o s s 9); a n d t o w o r k " t h e m i n d w e k n o w i n d r e a m i n g , a n o n r a t i o n a l , n o n l i n e a r c o m p r e h e n s i o n o f e v e n t s i n w h i c h slips in t i m e a n d s p a c e a r e n o r m a l " ( L o p e z 200). L o p e z , W i e b e , a n d M o s s a r e a m o n g t h e m o s t s y m p a t h e t i c , sensitive, a n d " o p e n " o f c o n t e m p o r a r y travel writers. N o n e t h e l e s s , their readers m i g h t d o well to lake heed o f M o s s ' s obser v a t i o n t h a t " U l t i m a T ' h u l e is a p r o j e c t i o n o f p r i v a t e a n d c o l l e c t i v e a s p i r a t i o n s , a p a r a d o x , just b e y o n d ( h e last p l a c e l o be r e a c h e d . L i g u r a 36
3 7
Z.UNllJi
I IM,
t i v e l y it e x i s t s ; l i t e r a l l y it is a f a n t a s y " (134). U l t i m a T h u l e , t h e m y t h i c i z e d " A r c t i c , " is a z o n e o f s i l e n c e , c o n t e m p l a t i o n , a n d t h e p a t i e n c e w i t h w h i c h its v i s i t o r s n e g o t i a t e t h e i r s t a y — a n d t h e i r p a s s a g e h o m e . T h i s c h a p t e r has s h o w n h o w , at their best, travel n a r r a t i v e offer s u b j e c t i v e p o r t r a i t s o f zones: g e o g r a p h i c a l - t r o p o l o g i c a l r e g i o n s , c o u n t r i e s , o r g r o u p s o f countries. T h e s e z o n e s are defined, n o t o n l y b y the obser v a n t m o v e m e n t s o f travelers t h r o u g h territory, b u t also b y a n a c c u m u lation o f lore (geographical, historical, ethnographic, m y t h i c ) . S u c h l o r e , as h y b r i d t o t a l i t y , g i v e s a t e x t u a l d e n s i t y t o t r a v e l e r s ' e x p e r i e n c e s , e v e n if t h e y d o n o t e n d u p t u r n i n g these experiences i n t o travel b o o k s . O n this level, travel b e c o m e s a p o t e n t i a l l y rich w a y o f " k n o w i n g " the w o r l d : it m e d i a t e s k n o w l e d g e s t h a t a r e all i n s o m e s e n s e " d i s c i p l i n a r y " t h r o u g h a special k i n d o f lived e x p e r i e n c e ; a n d these k n o w l e d g e s , equally, m e d i a t e the personal experience o f travel. O n a n o t h e r level, t h e c u m u l a t i v e p r o c e s s e s i n v o l v e d in t e x t u a l i z i n g ( t r a v e l ) z o n e s h a v e achieved, despite their c o m p l e x i t y , a certain c o n d e n s a t i o n . T h e s e p r o c e s s e s h a v e b e e n e c o n o m i z e d , t h a t is, b y b e i n g c a r e f u l l y a l l o c a t e d w i t h i n specific W e s t e r n i m a g i n a t i v e a n d ideological b o u n d a r i e s : the " f r o n t i e r , " the " l i m i n a l , " the " e x o t i c , " the " O r i e n t a l , " a n d so o n . T r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s a r e b e s t s e e n , t h e n , as r e v e a l i n g e x p l o r a t i o n s , b u t a l s o i n t e r r o g a t i o n s , o f these ideologically b o u n d e d discourses. E v e n w h e n travel writers inscribe their texts " u n p r o b l e m a t i c a l l y " w i t h i n o n e o r o t h e r o f t h e s e d i s c o u r s e s , t h e t e x t s t h e m s e l v e s o f f e r sites w h e r e r e a d e r s can u n d e r t a k e the w o r k o f interrogation. T r a v e l writing, in other w o r d s , b e c o m e s a v a i l a b l e as a n i n s t r u m e n t w i t h w h i c h w e c a n b e g i n t o refine, revise, a n d d e c o n s t r u c t t h e cliches t h a t h a v e r e d u c e d z o n e s o f great historical range a n d cultural c o m p l e x i t y to a clutch o f "instant" images a n d one-dimensional stereotypes. T h e following chapter links these stereotypes t o g e n d e r (mis)perceptions. It suggests t h a t the i m a g e r y o f travel has historically been a m a l e o n e , b u t also that travel w r i t i n g m a y act t o estrange these phallic m y t h s a n d m a l e t r o p o l o g i e s ; t o i n t e r r o g a t e their cliches; a n d t o t r a n s g r e s s — t o s o m e e x t e n t — t h e g e n d e r codes o f h e r o i c m a l e a d v e n t u r e , clearing a space in the process f o r the subjectivities o f w o m e n travelers, a n d f o r the e x p l o r a t o r y j o u r neys a n d performances o f gay m e n .
Chapter three Gender and Other Troubles
WOMEN'S
TRAVEL
FEMINIST
WRITING
AND/AS
CRITIQUE
T r a v e l a n d travel writing are saturated w i t h m y t h o l o g y , b u t m o r e often than n o tthe m y t h s they i n v o k e are p r e d o m i n a n t l y male. A c c o u n t s o f travel writing tend t o suffer, likewise, f r o m a n acute gender i m b a l a n c e : E r i c L e e d , i n The Mind of the Traveler, c l e a r l y h a s t h e m a l e t r a v e l e r in his m i n d , w h i l e P a u l F u s s e l l (Abroad) a n d D e n n i s P o r t e r (Haunted Journeys) m e n t i o n h a r d l y a s i n g l e w o m a n w r i t e r . A c c o u n t s s u c h as t hese n e g l e c t a h i s t o r y o f w o m e n ' s t r a v e l a n d t r a v e l w r i t i n g ; t h e y o v e r l o o k the o b v i o u s differences in the conditions facing w o m e n travelers; a n d t h e y a l s o f o r g e t t h a i t r a v e l i t s e l f is a t h o r o u g h l y g e n d e r e d c a t e g o r y . T h e r h e t o r i c o f t r a v e l is s h o t t h r o u g h w i t h m e t a p h o r s t h a t r e i n force m a l e p r e r o g a t i v e s t o w a n d e r a n d c o n q u e r as t h e y please. " T r a v e l " itself—a currently fashionable m e t a p h o r f o r the slippage o r displacement o f cultural k n o w l e d g e — i s usually defined b y m e n a c c o r d i n g t o t h e dictates o f their experience. T h u s , while E d w a r d S a i d ' s i n f l u e n t i a l e s s a y " T r a v e l i n g T h e o r y " (1983) r i g h t l y asserts t h a t I l i c o r y h a s n o u n i v e r s a l v a n t a g e p o i n t , it t h e n m i s s e s t h e o p p o r t u n i t y t o i n q u i r e f u r t h e r i n t o t h e gendered p o l i t i c s o f l o c a t i o n . A n d J a m e s C l i f f o r d ' s " T r a v e l i n g C u l t u r e s " (1992), w h i l e o u t l i n i n g a f l e x i b l e , " c u t t i n g e d g e " m o d e l o f e t h n o g r a p h y — o n e t h a t sees e t h n o g r a p h e r s a n d t h e i r subjects as traversing, rather t h a n m e r e l y i n h a b i t i n g , a cultural terri t o r y t h e n fails a g a i n t o a c c o u n t f o r t h e i m p l i c a t i o n s o f s e x u a l d i f f e r e n c e : l o see h o w s u c h t r a v e r s a l s a r e a l w a y s a l r e a d y g e n d e r e d . S a i d a n d ( l i f f o r d , a m o n g o t h e r l e a d i n g c o n t e m p o r a r y social a n d c u l t u r a l t h e o rists, h a v e b e e n a t t a c k e d f o r b e i n g i n a d v e r t e n t l y m a s c u l i n i s l . T h e s e 1
2
3
HI
a t t a c k s h a v e b e e n m o s t c o n c e r t e d , s i g n i f i c a n t l y , i n t h e field o f g e o g r a p h y . G i l l i a n R o s e ' s Feminism and Geography (1993) e x e m p l i f i e s a h a r d h i t t i n g a p p r o a c h t h a t sees g e o g r a p h y , a n d its a p p r o p r i a t i o n i n c u r r e n t s o c i a l a n d c u l t u r a l t h e o r y , as a n a c a d e m i c h a v e n f o r ( m o s t l y w h i t e ) b o u r g e o i s m a s c u l i n i t y . G e o g r a p h y , a c c o r d i n g t o R o s e , is b a s e d o n a positivistic legacy w h o s e claims t o objectivity a n d d e t a c h m e n t bolster the i d e o l o g y o f masculinist reason; i n a d d i t i o n , t h e discipline h a s t e n d e d t h r o u g h o u t t h e c o u r s e o f its h i s t o r y t o set a n d d e f i n e i t s e l f o v e r a n d a g a i n s t a n " e m b o d i e d f e m i n i z e d O t h e r " (6-7, 60-61). R o s e ' s b o o k is b o t h a c r i t i q u e o f e x i s t i n g g e o g r a p h i c a l m o d e l s a n d a n a t t e m p t t o e s t a b l i s h first p r i n c i p l e s f o r a f e m i n i s t g e o g r a p h y . A f e m i n i s t g e o g r a p h y insists o n w h a t T e r e s a d e L a u r e t i s calls " t h e p o l i t i c s o f e v e r y d a y l i f e " (12); it b r e a k s d o w n c h e r i s h e d d i v i s i o n s b e t w e e n t h e p u b l i c a n d p r i v a t e s p h e r e s ; a n d a b o v e a l l p e r h a p s , it d i s m a n t l e s w h i t e m a l e c l a i m s t o a privileged territoriality, i n p a r t b y stressing c u l t u r a l differences a n d a multiplicity o f possible perspectives. W h a t does feminist g e o g r a p h y m e a n in practical terms f o r c o n t e m p o r a r y w o m e n t r a v e l w r i t e r s ? F i r s t , it asserts w o m e n ' s t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s as b o t h e x p l o r a t o r y a n d d i s r u p t i v e , b r e a k i n g t h e c h a i n t h a t ties g e n e r a t i o n s o f m a l e e x p l o r e r s t o t h e l a n d . A n d s e c o n d , it a l l o w s f o r t h e possibility o f alternative perspectives: the o p e n i n g u p , f o r e x a m p l e , o f Utopian z o n e s o r liberated spaces t h r o u g h w h i c h w o m e n ' s travel w r i t ing c a n emerge as a n e x p l o r a t i o n o f female desire.
4
This balance
between critique a n d celebratory self-expression has been e m p h a s i z e d in several recent a c a d e m i c studies o f w o m e n ' s travel w r i t i n g . K a r e n L a w r e n c e ' s Penelope Voyages (1994), f o r e x a m p l e , sees w o m e n t r a v e l w r i t e r s ( h e r f o c u s is o n B r i t a i n ) as r e i n v e n t i n g a n O d y s s e a n t r a d i t i o n t h a t l e g i t i m a t e s t h e m a l e e x p l o r e r . I n H o m e r ' s Odyssey, U l y s s e s w a n ders while P e n e l o p e , his wife, m u s t w a i t ; L a w r e n c e counteracts this o r t h o d o x v i e w b y s t r e s s i n g P e n e l o p e ' s r o l e as a w e a v e r w h o , i n M i c h e l Serres's w o r d s , b o t h " m a k e s a n d u n d o e s t h e c l o t h that m i m e s t h e p r o g r e s s . . . o f t h e n a v i g a t o r " (7). P e n e l o p e c a n t h u s b e seen as f a s h ioning h e r o w n clandestine itinerary: a n itinerary that, rather t h a n e m u l a t i n g the exploits o f the m a l e explorer, incorporates t h e m into a pattern—a
weave—that
symbolically
crosses
gender
boundaries
( L a w r e n c e 8-11). L a w r e n c e ' s p a r a d i g m is s o m e w h a t c o n t r i v e d , b u t it is u s e f u l i n s o f a r as it r e m i n d s u s t h a t w o m e n h a v e h i s t o r i c a l l y u s e d t r a v e l w r i t i n g t o c u t a c r o s s g e n d e r c o n v e n t i o n s . B y " w e a v i n g " t h e m s e l v e s in a n d o u t o f e s t a b l i s h e d places a n d social r o l e s , w o m e n t r a v e l e r - w r i t e r s h a v e f a s h 11 •
r o u R h S T s w i 111 i v c i t w i ' t 11 i'
ioned a space in which to explore their own identities. T h e y have used travel writing to liberate themselves, at least temporarily, from the con straints placed upon them by their own societies, and to find the free d o m to engage in an alternative w a y of life. Needless to say, serious dis advantages remain for w o m e n traveler-writers. Some o f these are historical: as M a r y Morris points out in her introduction to a recent anthology of women's travel writing, Maiden Voyages (1993), "Flights and evasion, the need to escape domestic constraints and routine, to get a w a y and at the same time to conquer—this form o f flight from the home [has been] more typical o f the male experience" (xv). A n d others are biological; for w o m e n traveler-writers cannot help but be aware of their own physical vulnerability—"the fear o f rape, for example, whether crossing the Sahara or . . . just crossing a city street at night, most dramatically affects the ways w o m e n move through the w o r l d " (xvii). Morris holds the consensus view a m o n g w o m e n traveler-writers that "the constraints and perils, the perceptions and complex emotions women journey with are different from those o f men" (xvii). A n t h o l o gies such as Morris's reinforce this special status, serving to celebrate women's triumphs over conditions unfavorable to their sex. Here, for example, from the introduction to Lisa St. A u b i n de Teran's collection Indiscreet Journeys (1990): "Because of social taboos and the physical vulnerability o f w o m e n , it has always been harder for them to travel, particularly alone. Perhaps that is w h y their feats seem all the more admirable once achieved" (xvi). O r here, from the introduction to Sonia Melchett's Passionate Quests (1991): " M o d e r n travel stretches women's imagination and power o f physical endurance to the limit. . . . By risking hardship, sickness, boredom and even death, and then by surviving," w o m e n travelers validate life, "not just escaping from a humdrum existence, b u t . . . reaching for a kind o f liberty" (3). There are problems, o f course, associated with this separatist view of women's travel writing. F o r one thing, anthologies in the spirit of, say, de Teran's or Morris's risk essentializing women's travel writing, seeing it as inevitably "feminist" or preoccupied with "the private sphere." A n d for another, the tendency to l o o k for connections between different women's travel narratives—to see w o m e n ' s travel writing as a repository o f shared female experience—is a function, at least in part, o f contemporary market forces: of the commodification of women writers, women's writing, women's literature, and the institulionalizalion of women's studies al. Western universities. (So much is clear IVom the plethora of anthologies c u r r e n t l y available on the inar-
i.i
NM'I'
'. i'
11 > ( i T H K K I I "
111111
i-\
11 t
Iket, o r f r o m t h e w i d e r a n g e o f r e c e n t c r i t i c a l s t u d i e s t h a t f o c u s o n w o m e n ' s travel w r i t i n g . Interestingly, t h o u g h , m a n y o f these latter e m p h a s i z e the nineteenth century, tending t o s u c c u m b in the process t o the v e r y n o s t a l g i a o n w h i c h m e n ' s t r a v e l w r i t i n g is o f t e n b a s e d . ) F i n a l l y , a t e m p t a t i o n exists t o c o n s c r i p t w o m e n ' s t r a v e l w r i t i n g i n t o the service o f a n e m a n c i p a t o r y politics, m o s t o f t e n t h r o u g h a c o m b i n a t i o n o f w o m e n ' s l i b e r a t i o n a n d a n t i c o l o n i a l i s m . S a r a M i l l s ' s Discourses of Difference (1991) is v a l u a b l e h e r e i n s h o w i n g h o w w o m e n ' s t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s m a y be " f e m i n i s t " i n s o m e respects w h i l e r e m a i n i n g " i m p e rialist" in others. Mills's study o f nineteenth-century w o m e n travelerwriters e x a m i n e s , precisely, the interface b e t w e e n w o m e n ' s travel writ ing a n d imperialism, s h o w i n g h o w w o m e n such as Isabella B i r d , N i n a M a z u c h e l l i , a n d M a r y K i n g s l e y reached in their travels f o r f r e e d o m f r o m the constraints placed u p o n t h e m b y a Victorian patriarchy while r e m a i n i n g b o u n d w i t h i n the d o m i n a n t imperialist discourse o f the d a y (27-66). T h e s e w r i t e r s , a c c o r d i n g t o M i l l s , o c c u p i e d a n i n t e r m e d i a r y p o s i t i o n like t h a t o f the ( A n g l o - I n d i a n ) m e m s a h i b : w h i l e t h e y w e r e rel atively e m a n c i p a t e d a n d sometimes c h a m p i o n e d w o m e n ' s rights, they were a l s o c a l l e d u p o n t o u p h o l d a n d p r o t e c t t h e c o l l e c t i v e i n t e r e s t s o f E m p i r e (58-80; see a l s o B a r r ) . A s i m i l a r p o s i t i o n is a r g u a b l y o c c u p i e d b y s o m e o f t h e i r l a t e - t w e n t i e t h - c e n t u r y c o u n t e r p a r t s , w h o i n a n a g e a f t e r E m p i r e a r e still a p t , i n spite of t h e m s e l v e s , t o exercise i m p e r i a l rights. T w o p o s t w a r w o r k s w r i t t e n i n t h i s v e i n a r e D c r v l a M u r p h y ' s Full Tilt (1965) a n d , m o r e r e c e n t l y , M a r y M o r r i s ' s Nothing to Declare (1988). B o t h a r e c o n f e s sional narratives that illustrate M o r r i s ' s v i e w that w o m e n ' s travel writ i n g is m o r e d i r e c t l y p e r s o n a l — m o r e r e v e a l i n g o f t h e w r i t e r ' s o w n e m o tions—than men's. M u r p h y , f o r example, favors a n epistolary f o r m — s e l d o m used b y male travel writers—to recount her experiences o f t r a v e l i n g a l o n e b y b i c y c l e to A f g h a n i s t a n , P e r s i a , a n d I n d i a . A n d M o r r i s , p r a c t i c i n g w h a t s h e p r e a c h e s , sees t h e n a r r a t i v e o f h e r e x t e n d e d j o u r n e y t o C e n t r a l A m e r i c a as a n o p p o r t u n i t y f o r i n q u i r y a n d o f t e n a g o n i z e d self-debate. B o t h o f these narratives enact a dia logue b e t w e e n a d v e n t u r e a n d introspection: their external j o u r n e y s are a c c o m p a n i e d b y a n inner quest f o r self-understanding. A t times, the c o n f e s s i o n a l strain o f t h e w r i t i n g b e c o m e s u n d u l y narcissistic, l a p s i n g in M u r p h y ' s case i n t o a b r e a s t - b e a t i n g e x a m i n a t i o n of h e r o w n i n a d e quacies o r , in M o r r i s ' s , into trancelike reveries redolent of N e w A g e psychobabble:
114
TWIKINTS W i l l i
TVI'I'lwHITIIMft
At various times ghosts or gods run my life. The ghosts I find in my room a t night, in the eyes of brujas [witches], in the bird nailed t o the tree. While the past struggles to keep me back, the gods propel me forward. Into risk and sacrifice, choice and responsibility. The ghosts are in charge of memory, the gods' domain is destiny. . . . I listen to the ghosts and obey the gods. The ghosts whisper, the gods prod. I listen like a cat at an opening t o a wall, and then when it is safe, I pass through. When the gods recede, the ghosts take over and when I let go of the ghosts, some of whom mean me no harm, the gods send me out on my missions. I return to find the infiltration of ghosts. (125-26) M o r e endearing than such indulgences are Morris's and, especially, M u r p h y ' s efforts to analyze their compromised status as white West ern w o m e n travelers. T h u s , despite her
entirely conventional—revul
sion for "busloads o f French and G e r m a n tourists." M o r r i s manages (unlike some o f her male counterparts) to admit that she is a tourist too; M u r p h y , meanwhile, irritated at being taken for and deferred to as a memsahib during her travels, nonetheless recognizes that her bohemian demeanor cannot mask her Western privilege. M u r p h y and, in a different context, M o r r i s emerge as variations on what, adapting Albert M e m m i , we might call the "memsahib w h o refuses."
For
M e m m i , "the colonizer w h o refuses" plays an impossible historical role: He may openly protest, or sign a petition, or join a group which is not automatically hostile toward the colonized. This already suffices for him to recognize that he has simply changed difficulties and discom fort. It is not easy to escape mentally from a concrete situation, to refuse its ideology while continuing to live with its actual relation ships. From now on, he lives his life under the sign of a contradiction which looms at every step, depriving him of all coherence and all tranquillity. (20) The colonizer, however much he dissents, is still part o f the oppressing g r o u p and—at least as M e m m i sees it—will be forced to share its des tiny. M e m m i ' s opposition is overdrawn, essentializing "the c o l o n i z e d " as a victim and "the colonizer" as an oppressor w h o k n o w s h o w to use his greater force; nonetheless, his critical description has relevance for F u r o - A m e r i c a n traveler-writers-especially for those, like M u r p h y , who
have leftist anticolonial views. M u r p h y is certainly
genuine
enough in her anticolonial sentiments, and Full Till includes several full-blooded lirades against the First World's depredations on the
UHNIII'K
A N l l I H I I I I I I I K I I I 111
I I t
T h i r d . B u i s h e b e l o n g s , l i k e it o r n o t , t o a p r i v i l e g e d g r o u p o f F i r s t W o r l d wanderers: her romanticization o fT h i r d W o r l d plight and her fierce c r i t i q u e o f W e s t e r n m a t e r i a l i s m a r e i n p a r t t h e p r o d u c t o f a c u l tural b a c k g r o u n d that allows her freedom o f m o v e m e n t a n d expres sion, in part the result o f a genre t h a t tends t o t a k e such f r e e d o m s f o r g r a n t e d . M u r p h y ' s i n t e r m e d i a r y s t a t u s as a t r a v e l i n g " m e m s a h i b w h o refuses" scotches the binaries o f the " c o l o n i z e d w o m a n " a n d the " c o l o n i z i n g m a n . " B u t t h e s l i p p a g e b e t w e e n t h e s e c a t e g o r i e s c r e a t e s its o w n h i s t o r i c a l a n x i e t i e s ; a n d i n r e c o g n i z i n g t h e s e , M u r p h y resists t h e t r a v eler's s t o c k t e m p t a t i o n t o ( f a l s e ) e s c a p e . M u r p h y , a n I r i s h w o m a n in India, a n d M o r r i s , a n A m e r i c a n w o m a n in M e x i c o , are conscious t h r o u g h o u t their narratives o f the a m b i v a l e n c e o f their position. O n the o n e h a n d , they are F i r s t W o r l d tourists in relatively i m p o v e r i s h e d T h i r d W o r l d countries; o n t h e other, they are w o m e n travelers l a b o r i n g u n d e r the (heightened) disad v a n t a g e s o f t h e i r sex. B o t h w o m e n , t r a v e l i n g a l o n e , a r e t h e o b j e c t s o f u n w e l c o m e m a l e a t t e n t i o n , a n d M o r r i s , i n p a r t i c u l a r , is c o n s t a n t l y alert t o the threat o f r a p e . I n M e x i c o , she rides i n t o t h e j u n g l e , a c c o m panied b y a taciturn guide: I l o o k e d at A b o n d i o carefully. H e w a s a silent, h a r d e n e d m a n . I h a d entrusted m y s e l f to h i m t h r o u g h this j u n g l e that h a d n o trail. A n d he c o u l d d o a n y t h i n g he w a n t e d to m e . B u t there w a s a softness to his eyes, a gentle c u r v e to his lips, a n d I k n e w he w o u l d n o t h a r m
me.
W h e n y o u travel alone, y o u learn to read those inner maps. Y o u l e a r n t o t r u s t a l a n d s c a p e t h a t is f a m i l i a r o n l y i n s i d e y o u r h e a d . ( 7 9 )
L a t e r , d a n g e r r e a p p e a r s a f t e r she h a s t a k e n a m o o n l i t s w i m . B e l i e v ing- - i m a g i n i n g ? - - t h a t s h e is b e i n g p u r s u e d b y t w o m e n w h o a p p e a r s u d d e n l y o n t h e h o r i z o n , she dives b a c k i n t o t h e w a t e r a n d s w i m s slowly u n d e r the surface: 1 t h o u g h t h o w e a s y it w o u l d b e f o r t h e m t o p l u c k m e f r o m t h e s e a . I k e p t s w i m m i n g u p the s h o r e , a w a y f r o m the p l a c e in the m o o n l i g h t I h a d found, oblivious o f the urchins, the barracuda, the night eaters, the reaching
fingers
o f j e l l y f i s h . I s w a m into the d a r k e s t w a t e r o f all
and stayed there, until they were g o n e .
(102)
T h e f a n t a s y o f being chased recurs m a n y times in M o r r i s ' s narrative; c o n t i n u a l l y s u r r o u n d e d b y things a n d , especially, people m e n that f r i g h t e n h e r , she c o n v e r t s h e r w r i t i n g i n t o a g r a p h o f h e r s u b l i m i n a l fears a n d desires. T h e s e fears a n d desires a r e c e n t e r e d o n h e r o w n e r o t i -
I Id
1 I >I II'1 •-1w
I
1
I
' I
I I
cized body. Morris's b o d y has its o w n geography, its o w n itineraries and landscapes; it acts both as a sensor for her experience in the present and as a receptacle for collective memories o f experiences in the past: " W o m e n remember. Our bodies remember. Every part o f us remem bers everything that has ever happened. Every touch, every feel, every thing is there in our skin, ready to be reawakened, revived" (101). F o r Morris, travel is a register for the experience o f embodiment: it sets in motion a process that provides the stimulus for "revival." But travel is also a site o f risk where the "reawakened" female body becomes the object o f others' desire and threatens to turn into a trap. Morris c o m pares her situation to that o f other w o m e n travelers, some of w h o m she befriends; she feels, as she imagines they do, that her journey is a test o f mettle, a trial not only of her own strength but of the collective strength of her sex. M o r e apparent, however, are the moments o f weakness with which she punctuates her narrative—moments that draw her nearer, perhaps, to her target female readership, but that also show the gap between her and her fellow w o m e n travelers' aspirations to greater freedom and the awareness o f their movement between alternative forms o f confinement. If the freedom o f travel turns out, in some respects, to be an empty promise, it m a y yet hold consolations, Pyrrhic victories for the dispos sessed. N o t least a m o n g these is the capacity to play with gender stereotypes. Morris and M u r p h y try to draw attention away from themselves as w o m e n travelers by pretending to imitate men, both in their attitudes and styles of dress. Both travelers favor men's clothing, and M u r p h y , in particular, takes on a persona "so beyond the imagin ing o f everyone [in India and, especially, Afghanistan] that it's univer sally assumed I'm a m a n " (27). Eric N e w b y , w h o negotiates similar geographical territory in A Short Walk in the Hindu Kush (see chap. [), is seemingly horrified o f being found to be effeminate. M u r p h y , in contrast, takes advantage o f her ambiguous sexual status; in Afghani stan, for instance, she grows accustomed to being the only w o m a n present, on more than one occasion being asked to share in the locals' macho jokes: 5
It c e r t a i n l y is a c u r i o u s e x p e r i e n c e t o b e a w o m a n t r a v e l l i n g a l o n e i n -
M u s l i m c o u n t r i e s . M o s t o f o n e ' s t i m e is s p e n t i n t h e c o m p a n y o f m e n o n l y , being treated w i t h the respect d u e t o a w o m a n , b u t being talked t o n i i i n - l o - m a n , s o t h a t i n t h e e n d o n e begins t o feel s o m e w h a t h e r m a p h r o d i t i c . (213)
' . 1 '•; 1 > 1;it AND i l l i n 11 1 in m i l l 1 \
11 /
W h i l e neither M u r p h y n o r M o r r i s goes t o the lengths o f a n o t h e r c o n t e m p o r a r y w o m a n traveler, S a r a h H o b s o n , w h o , e m u l a t i n g Isabelle E b e r h a r d t , f o l l o w s a f o r b i d d e n t r a i l i n I r a n b y p o s i n g as a m a n , t h e y b o t h question the b o u n d a r i e s separating m a l e f r o m female travelers, counteracting the perceptions associated w i t h their sexuality b y delib e r a t e l y m a n i p u l a t i n g s t e r e o t y p i c a l g e n d e r r o l e s . I n t h i s sense, t h e y p r o v i d e o b l i q u e e x a m p l e s o f w h a t M a r j o r i e G a r b e r w i t t i l y calls " c r o s s d r e s s i n g f o r s u c c e s s " : t h e i r " h e r m a p h r o d i t i c " s t a t u s is, i n G a r b e r ' s w o r d s , " a m e c h a n i s m o f d i s p l a c e m e n t , " o p e n i n g u p a " c a t e g o r y cri sis," r e v o l v i n g a r o u n d t h e figure o f g e n d e r , t h a t " d e s t a b i l i z e s t h e c o m f o r t a b l e b i n a r i t y " o f c o n v e n t i o n a l s e x u a l d i f f e r e n c e (16-17). 6
T h i s d e s t a b i l i z a t i o n is t a k e n a s t a g e f u r t h e r b y t h e p o p u l a r W e l s h w r i t e r J a n M o r r i s , w h o s e e a r l i e r n a r r a t i v e s w e r e n o t o n l y w r i t t e n as, b u t l i v e d a s , t h e male t r a v e l e r - w r i t e r , J a m e s . O n e o f t h e m o s t p r o l i f i c a n d highly rated o f c o n t e m p o r a r y travel writers, w i t h m o r e t h a n t w e n t y b o o k s t o h e r n a m e , J a n M o r r i s w a s b o r n i n 1926 a s t h e m a l e child J a m e s M o r r i s . James's c h i l d h o o d , affectionately rendered i n the a u t o b i o g r a p h i c a l v o l u m e Conundrum (1974), r e s e m b l e s t h a t o f t h e C h a r l e s R y d e r figure o f E v e l y n W a u g h ' s Brideshead Revisited: sensi tive, s o m e w h a t f e m i n i z e d , sexually u n f o r m e d , a n d avidly aestheticizi n g . A l s o l i k e R y d e r , t h e y o u n g M o r r i s p r o c e e d e d i n t o t h e a r m y as t h e Second W o r l d W a r ended, j o i n i n g the N i n t h Q u e e n ' s R o y a l L a n c e r s after a formulaic high school education at L a n c i n g , one o f E n g l a n d ' s g r e a t p r i v a t e s c h o o l s . A s Conundrum p r e s e n t s t h e m , t h e n e x t f i f t e e n y e a r s o f M o r r i s ' s life w e r e " d o u b l e d " : f o r w h i l e o n t h e s u r f a c e h e f o l l o w e d a n e x e m p l a r y m a l e career pattern, e m e r g i n g f r o m the a r m y o f B r i t a i n ' s last i m p e r i a l d e c a d e t o t a k e u p the p r o f e s s i o n o f f o r e i g n cor r e s p o n d e n t , he also felt o n a d e e p e r level t h a t he w a s a w o m a n i m p r i s o n e d i n the b o d y o f a m a n . A s these feelings increased, M o r r i s b e g a n t o p r e p a r e h i m s e l f p s y c h o l o g i c a l l y f o r the sex c h a n g e — i n i t i a t e d a d e c a d e l a t e r a n d c o m p l e t e d i n 1972 a f t e r a n o p e r a t i o n i n C a s a b l a n c a — f r o m w h i c h M o r r i s , J a m e s ( m a l e c o r r e s p o n d e n t ) e m e r g e d as M o r r i s , J a n ( w o m a n travel writer). G i v e n t h e associations in other w o m e n travel writers' w o r k b e t w e e n travel a n d sexual transgression, o n e m i g h t expect t h e sex change t o have h a d p r o f o u n d implications f o r Morris's travel writ i n g s . Y e t , s t r a n g e l y p e r h a p s , t h e p o t e n t i a l f o r t r a v e l t o b e f i g u r e d as a f r a u g h t c r o s s i n g o f s e x u a l b o u n d a r i e s is u n d e r e m p h a s i z e d i n , i f n o t entirely absent f r o m , J a n M o r r i s ' s later w o r k . O n o n e level, M o r r i s s e e m s in h e r t r a v e l w r i t i n g t o d i s a v o w h e r s e x u a l i t y : " M u c h o f t h e IlK
T O U R L S I S W I T H T V T ' K W U I I I'.HS
e m o t i o n a l force . . . that m e n spend in sex, I s u b l i m a t e d i n t r a v e l " (101). M o r r i s a p p e a r s t o h a v e s e e n t h e s e x / g e n d e r s p l i t t h a t m o t i v a t e d h e r s e x c h a n g e m o r e as a p r a c t i c a l p r o b l e m s/he n e e d e d t o s o l v e t h a n as a p s y c h o l o g i c a l c o m p l e x ; c o n s e q u e n t l y , t h e r e s e e m s l i t t l e s c o p e f o r r e a d i n g h e r t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s a s screens f o r f a b l e s o f ( g e n d e r ) s u b v e r sion. Issues o f g e n d e r t h r o u g h o u t J a n M o r r i s ' s w o r k t a k e a distant s e c o n d p l a c e t o t h e a t t e m p t — p a r t i c u l a r l y e v i d e n t i n t h e Pax Britannica t r i l o g y — t o r e c u p e r a t e a n d i m a g i n a t i v e l y r e p o s s e s s t h e B r i t i s h i m p e r i a l w o r l d . S u c h a v i e w o f M o r r i s ' s w o r k implies t h a t she m i g h t b e b e t t e r s e e n , a l o n g s i d e N e w b y a n d O ' H a n l o n , as a t o n g u e - i n - c h e e k chronicler o f Britain's f o r m e r imperial "glories." B u t m o m e n t s o f sex u a l t e n s i o n do e x i s t i n M o r r i s ' s w o r k , b o t h b e f o r e a n d a f t e r t h e o p e r a t i o n , t h a t suggest a m o r e conflicted v i e w t h a n t h e o n e she wishes t o present i n her a u t o b i o g r a p h y . F o r J a m e s M o r r i s , ideally p o s i t i o n e d as a foreign correspondent f o r the romantic observation o f a male w o r l d in t h e s e r v i c e o f E m p i r e , g i v e s t h i s w o r l d a n u n m i s t a k a b l y F o r s t e r i a n homoero'tic twist. 7
A t o u c h s t o n e l o c a t i o n h e r e is C a i r o , w h e r e M o r r i s , i n t h e fifties, was clearly responsive t o the same M i d d l e E a s t e r n / A r a b i a n m y s t i q u e , w i t h its r e s o n a n c e s o f a r i s t o c r a t i c m a s c u l i n i t y , a l l u r i n g l y v e i l e d f e m i ninity, a n d a m b i v a l e n t sexual impulse, that W e s t e r n writers a n d i m a g e - m a k e r s h a v e invested i n icons like L a w r e n c e o f A r a b i a . W h i l e M o r r i s might n o t have h a d a n y long-term fascination with exploring the b o r d e r l i n e territories o f sex a n d g e n d e r , the L e v a n t i n e sphere o f his a c t i v i t i e s a s a c o r r e s p o n d e n t d u r i n g t h e fifties p r o v i d e d a s i t e — a " c o n tact z o n e " ( P r a t t ) — f o r t h e r o m a n c i n g o f h i s p e r s o n a l " c o n u n d r u m , " a n d f o r t h e s e l e c t i o n o f t h e v a r i o u s i m a g e s t h a t h e m i g h t call u p o n t o s y m b o l i z e it. C a i r o , t h e p l a c e w h e r e " I s l a m . . . is t r a n s l a t e d i n t o w o r l d l y terms, into t h e languages o f art, politics, s h o w m a n s h i p a n d e c o n o m i c s , i n t o the dialectics o f thinkers a n d t h e f o r m u l a s o f science" (171) is t h e f o c a l p o i n t o f t h i s L e v a n t i n e w o r l d ; it is a c i t y t h a t a c h i e v e s a n a l m o s t m a g n e t i c r e s o n a n c e i n M o r r i s ' s w o r k , a city t h a t lures h i m ( a n d , later, h e r ) i n , a n d d r a w s b o t h o f t h e m b a c k f o r m o r e . I n t o this s y m b o l i c site M o r r i s i n t r o d u c e s s e v e r a l o f t h e s t r a n d s t h a t E d w a r d S a i d l a t e r u n r a v e l s i n Orientalism (1978)- - t h e W e s t e r n e r s ' O r i e n t o f sexual allure, religious fanaticism, a n d political/moral duplicity. C a i r o , and the L e v a n t in general, although described a b o v e in material lerms, gather u p elsewhere the m o r e predictable associations o f d e s p o t i s m a n d e s p i o n a g e . H e r e , f o r e x a m p l e , is a b r i e f p a s s a g e f r o m t h e n o v e l Lust Letters from /lav (1985): 8
9
O I S N D H U A N I.) O T I I l i U T H O I I I t l . l i S
119
T h e longer I l o o k e d a t t h e G o v e r n o r t h e less h e seemed like t h e benevolent figurehead o f an idiosyncratic M e d i t e r r a n e a n b a c k w a t e r , a n d t h e m o r e like o n e o f those spidery despots o n e reads a b o u t i n o l d b o o k s o f O r i e n t a l travel, c r o u c h i n g there at the heart o f his w e b . (117) N o t , o f c o u r s e , t h a t C a i r o i t s e l f is a n " i d i o s y n c r a t i c b a c k w a t e r , " a n d i n Farewell the Trumpets (1978), t h e final v o l u m e o f t h e Pax Britannica trilogy, M o r r i s goes so f a r as t o declare, " F o r s o m e years o f the w a r C a i r o w a s t h e m i l i t a r y c a p i t a l o f t h e B r i t i s h E m p i r e " (438). A c r o s s t h e r a n g e o f passages, essays, a n d chapters i n b o o k s w h e r e C a i r o a p p e a r s , it d o e s s o i n a n u m b e r o f g u i s e s : as t h e s e t t i n g f o r a l a t e c o l o n i a l s h o w d o w n between British a m b a s s a d o r Sir Miles L a m p s o n a n d E g y p t i a n K i n g F a r o u k ( a t r i u m p h , in Morris's view, o f British integrity o v e r L e v a n t i n e w e a k n e s s ) ; as a n o s t a l g i c a l l y m e m o r i a l i z e d b a s e f o r M o r r i s ' s a c t i v i t i e s as a f o r e i g n c o r r e s p o n d e n t ; a s a n " a r c h a i c " a n d m e d i e v a l c i t y , c a p i t a l o f t h e A r a b a r t i s t i c w o r l d ; a n d , l a t t e r l y , as a h e d o n i s t i c a n d v o l a t i l e c i t y d u r i n g t h e last d a y s o f P r e s i d e n t A n w a r S a d a t . T h e " e s s e n tial" C a i r o , h o w e v e r ( w h i c h , like so m a n y other travel writers, M o r r i s i m a g i n e s h e r s e l f t o h a v e d i s c o v e r e d ) , is a p l a c e o f e v o c a t i o n a n d l o n g ing, a vestige o f the " m y s t e r i o u s E a s t " : Y e t there remains f o r m e still that sediment o f the sinister, a sugges t i o n o f stealth, secrecy a n d subversion. I sense it always i n that i m m e n s i t y o f desert, so e m p t y , so close a n d s o m e h o w so threatening. I feel it in t h e detestable folds o f the E g y p t i a n b a n k notes, w i t h a smell o f their o w n a n d evocations o f s l u m a n d bordel; i n t h e postures o f t h e silent, l o n g - r o b e d w a t c h m e n , sleepless i n the night streets; in the tall presences o f t h e minarets, elegant b u t a l w a y s w a t c h f u l ; a n d m o s t p a l p a b l y o f all, in those terrible m o n u m e n t s o f e g o i s m a n d e n i g m a , the p y r a m i d s o f G i z a . {Destinations 176-77) I f here the E g y p t i a n b a n k n o t e s are "offensively" folded, the folds o f t h e alert w a t c h m a n ' s r o b e s a r e n o t s o c o n s p i c u o u s l y s t i g m a t i z e d ; a n d it s e e m s , i n d e e d , as i f t h e f o l d i n g s , d r a p i n g s , a n d o b s c u r i n g s o f t r a ditional L e v a n t i n e costumes are offering M o r r i s t h e possibility o f i n t r i g u e o f a d i f f e r e n t , s e x u a l , k i n d . T h e v e i l e d figure is i n f a c t a r e c u r r e n t m e t a p h o r o f s e l f - r e p r e s e n t a t i o n i n M o r r i s ' s w o r k . I n Conundrum, M o r r i s r e f e r s t o h e r p r e v i o u s p o s i t i o n as a s e l f - c o n s c i o u s l y a m b i v a l e n t m a l e a m o n g t h e British soldiery i n t h e s a m e terms she will later use t o describe m o r e c o n v e n t i o n a l f o r m s o f espionage. T h u s , she likens her s e l f a t o n e p o i n t t o " a s p y in a e o u r l e o u s e n e m y c a m p " ( 3 3 ) , " c a m o u f l a g e d " a nil v i e w i n g t h e w o r l d " f r o m s o m e silenl c h a m b e r o f
l.'li
I ' l M I U N I
••• " M i l
I
V I'MWHI I I
t
[her] o w n " (56); t h e t e x t t h e n e x p l i c i t l y finds a n i m a g e f o r t h e s e i d e a s o f d e t a c h m e n t a n d i s o l a t i o n i n t h e figure o f t h e M u s l i m w o m a n , w h o s e veil " p r o t e c t s h e r f r o m so m a n y nuisances, a n d a l l o w s h e r t o be a t h e r b e s t o r h e r w o r s t i n s i d e " ( 1 1 3 ) . F i n a l l y , she r e t u r n s u s t o t h e N o r t h A f r i c a n M e d i t e r r a n e a n , a n d t o a series o f i m a g e s s h e m i g h t e q u a l l y w e l l h a v e a p p l i e d t o C a i r o . H e r e , f o r i n s t a n c e , is a v i v i d , p h a n t a s m i c vision o f C a s a b l a n c a — t h e place w h e r e the t r a n s f o r m a t i o n f r o m m a l e to female was eventually accomplished: T h e office b l o c k s m i g h t n o t l o o k m u c h like castle w a l l s , n o r the taxis l i k e c a m e l s o r c a r r i a g e s , b u t still I s o m e t i m e s h e a r d t h e l i m p i d A r a b music, and smelt the p u n g e n t A r a b smells, that h a d for so l o n g per v a d e d m y l i f e , a n d I c o u l d s u p p o s e it t o b e s o m e c i t y o f f a b l e , o f phoenix
and
effected,
when
phase.
fantasy, the
in w h i c h transubstantiations
omens
were right a n d
the m o o n
were
regularly
i n its
proper
(136)
R e f l e c t i n g b a c k o n a f o r m e r life, M o r r i s h i n t s a t its s e x u a l r e a w a k e n i n g — a t r a n s f o r m a t i o n that m i g h t be effected i f " t h e o m e n s are right a n d t h e m o o n i n its p r o p e r p h a s e . " S u c h h i n t s a r e as f a r as M o r r i s g o e s in " t r a n s g r e s s i n g " s e x u a l b o u n d a r i e s ; h e r p r i m a r y p r o j e c t lies else where, in the restoration o f imperial m y t h s . Nonetheless, i n using a n O r i e n t a l m y s t i q u e t o veil h e r p e r s o n a l feelings, M o r r i s suggests a tactic a v a i l a b l e t o w o m e n (as well as t o h o m o s e x u a l ) traveler-writers: t h e mystification o f their sexual preferences—the m a s k i n g o f their sexual being - that allows t h e m t o m o v e m o r e freely i n a m a l e - d o m i n a t e d world. 1 0
F o r M o r r i s , f r e e d o m o f a k i n d c a n be f o u n d b e h i n d the veil, c o n c e a l e d . F o r o t h e r t r a v e l e r - w r i t e r s , h o w e v e r , s u c h as t h e A u s t r a l i a n R o b y n D a v i d s o n , f r e e d o m is b e s t l e a r n e d i n t h e o p e n , i n t h e s u n l i t glare o f "desert places." L i k e several o f her m a l e c o n t e m p o r a r i e s — Bruce C h a t w i n and Paul T h e r o u x are the best-known e x a m p l e s — D a v i d s o n is d r a w n t o t h e d e s e r t as a site o f b o t h a d v e n t u r e a n d c o n t e m p l a t i o n . Tracks (1980), o n e o f t h e c a n n i e s t o f c o n t e m p o r a r y w o m e n ' s t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s , is h e r a c c o u n t o f a s i x - m o n t h t r i p a c r o s s t h e C e n t r a l A u s t r a l i a n desert, a c c o m p a n i e d (for the m o s t p a r t ) o n l y b y her p a c k c a m e l s a n d h e r e v e r - f a i t h f u l d o g . Tracks c o n t a i n s t h e classic ingredients f o r a w o m a n ' s survival narrative: the c o u r a g e o u s solitary t r a v e l e r , d e f y i n g t h e r e s t r i c t i o n s p l a c e d o n h e r sex; t h e fearless c o n f r o n t a t i o n o f total strangers a n d " h o s t i l e " s u r r o u n d i n g s ; the g r a d u a l a d a p t a t i o n t o a n d c o m m u n i o n w i t h the e n v i r o n m e n t . Y e t D a v i d s o n , 1 1
1 2
<•! M > t ! K A N f > I ' l t t i 1
H I ' .
1 : 1
t o h e r credit, c o u n t e r a c t s these e a s y cliches, resisting o t h e r s ' a t t e m p t s to corral her experiences into profitable m y t h : It w o u l d s e e m t h a t the c o m b i n a t i o n o f e l e m e n t s — w o m a n ,
desert,
c a m e l s , a l o n e n e s s — h i t s o m e soft s p o t in this e r a ' s p a s s i o n l e s s , h e a r t l e s s , a c h i n g p s y c h e . I t fired t h e i m a g i n a t i o n o f p e o p l e w h o s e e t h e m selves as alienated, powerless, unable to d o a n y t h i n g a b o u t a w o r l d g o n e m a d . A n d w o u l d n ' t it b e j u s t m y l u c k t o p i c k t h i s c o m b i n a t i o n . . . . I w a s n o w public property. I w a s n o w a feminist s y m b o l . 1 w a s n o w a n object o f ridicule for small-minded sexists, a n d I w a s a crazy, irresponsible adventurer (although n o t as c r a z y as I w o u l d have been h a d 1 failed). B u t w o r s e t h a n all t h a t , I w a s n o w a m y t h i c a l b e i n g w h o h a d d o n e s o m e t h i n g c o u r a g e o u s a n d outside the possibilities that other people could h o p e for. A n d that w a s the antithesis o f w h a t I w a n t e d to share. T h a t a n y o n e c o u l d do anything. If 1 c o u l d b u m b l e m y w a y a c r o s s a desert, t h e n a n y o n e c o u l d d o a n y t h i n g . A n d this w a s especially true for w o m e n , w h o h a v e used c o w a r d i c e for so l o n g to p r o t e c t t h e m s e l v e s t h a t it h a s b e c o m e a h a b i t . ( 2 3 7 - 3 8 )
Instead o f playing u p the hardships o fher j o u r n e y — t a k i n g a d v a n t a g e , like m a n y o f her peers, o f travel writing's p r o p e n s i t y f o r self-congratu l a t i o n — D a v i d s o n e m p h a s i z e s its f e a s i b i l i t y , e v e n c a l l i n g it, a f t e r w a r d s , " e a s y " (254). H e r m a j o r d i f f i c u l t y c o n s i s t s , r a t h e r , i n d e a l i n g w i t h p u b licity: i n c o p i n g w i t h those i m a g e m a k e r s , such as h e r s p o n s o r s National Geographic, w h o s e e k t o c a p i t a l i z e o n h e r " a d v e n t u r e s " b y t u r n i n g t h e m i n t o lucrative m e d i a spectacle. D a v i d s o n c o u l d b e accused h e r e o f a c t i n g i n b a d f a i t h ; after all, she accepts t h e s p o n s o r ship o f a m a g a z i n e she s e e m i n g l y despises, t h e n p r o c e e d s t o t u r n h e r j o u r n e y i n t o a n o t h e r c o m m o d i t y , a t r a v e l b o o k . Tracks is b e t t e r s e e n , t h o u g h , as a self-consciously critical e x a m i n a t i o n o f the m e d i a sensa t i o n a l i s m t h a t c o n t i n u e s t o d o g — a n d p a r t l y , t o d e f i n e — b o o k s o f its g e n r e . I n t h i s r e s p e c t , it r a n k s a l o n g s i d e C a t h e r i n e L u t z a n d J a n e C o l l i n s ' s r e c e n t c r i t i q u e o f National Geographic, w h i c h l a m b a s t e s t h e p o p u l a r m a g a z i n e f o r its m e d i a i m p e r i a l i s m a n d i t s v o y e u r i s t i c a p p r e c i a t i o n o f p h o t o g e n i c " p r i m i t i v e " p e o p l e s . ' H e r e , f o r i n s t a n c e , is a n e x c h a n g e b e t w e e n D a v i d s o n a n d t h e t r i g g e r - h a p p y National Geo graphic p h o t o g r a p h e r R i c h a r d S m o l a n , w h o j o i n s h e r p e r i o d i c a l l y , n o t a l w a y s happily, o n her trip: 3
W h a t e v e r justifications for p h o t o g r a p h i n g the A b o r i g i n e s I had c o m e u p w i t h b e f o r e , n o w w e r e t o t a l l y s h o t . It w a s i m m e d i a t e l y a p p a r e n t t h a t t h e y h a t e d it. . . . I a l s o r e a l i z e d t h a i c o v e r a g e in a c o n s e r v a t i v e m a g a z i n e l i k e Gt'o^mp/iic
w o u l d d o the p e o p l e n o g o o d al a l l , n o
I'Ol/IUiNTIS W t I II T V I ' l ' W K I I I'.KS
m a t t e r h o w I w r o t e the article. T h e y w o u l d r e m a i n q u a i n t primitives t o be g a w k e d at b y readers w h o c o u l d n ' t really give a d a m n w h a t w a s h a p p e n i n g t o t h e m . I a r g u e d w i t h R i c k t h a t he w a s i n v o l v e d in a f o r m o f parasitism. . . . H e c a m e u p w i t h all the o l d a r g u m e n t s , but w a s t o r n , I k n e w , because h e r e c o g n i z e d it was true. (49) D a v i d s o n ' s n a r r a t i v e resists, b y a n d l a r g e , s u c h o p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r c u l t u r a l v o y e u r i s m : h e r s u p p o r t f o r t h e A b o r i g i n e s is o f a n e n t i r e l y d i f f e r e n t k i n d t o , s a y , C h a t w i n ' s i n The Songlines: it is b a s e d o n a n u n d e r standing o f their material situation rather than o n a n aestheticized a d m i r a t i o n o f t h e " m y t h i c " q u a l i t i e s o f t h e i r c u l t u r e . D a v i d s o n is e q u a l l y r e s i s t a n t t o t h e m y t h i c i z a t i o n o f h e r o w n p e r s o n a : s h e m a k e s it c l e a r t h r o u g h o u t t h a t s h e is ( o r , p e r h a p s b e t t e r , w o u l d l i k e t o b e ) a w o m a n w h o travels rather t h a n a credentialed " w o m a n traveler," a candidate f o rthe anthologies a n d a c o m m o d i f i e d "tribute t o her sex." N o n e t h e l e s s , h e r n a r r a t i v e is w r i t t e n , t o s o m e e x t e n t , f r o m a f e m i n i s t viewpoint, berating her A u s t r a l i a n f e l l o w m e n f o r their crudeness a n d " s m a l l - m i n d e d s e x i s m " (237); finding c o n s o l a t i o n , s o m e w h a t r o m a n t i cally, in a n older A b o r i g i n a l system in w h i c h , " w h i l e m e n a n d w o m e n h a v e s e p a r a t e r o l e s , t h e s e r o l e s . . . a r e m u t u a l l y r e s p e c t e d " (174); a n d vigorously dismantling the m y t h s that surround the supposedly " w e a k e r sex," m y t h s that support the view o f her o w n "uniqueness" o r "exceptionality": [ G i r l s ] w a s t e so m u c h o f [their] e n e r g y seeking . . . t o p u s h u p the m i l lions o f tiny t h u m b s t h a t h a v e tried t o quelch . . . creativity a n d strength a n d self-confidence; t h a t h a v e so effectively caused [ t h e m ] t o b u i l d fences against possibility; t h a t h a v e so effectively k e p t [them] i m p r i s o n e d inside [their] n o t i o n s o f s e l f - w o r t h l e s s n e s s . . . . A n d n o w a m y t h w a s b e i n g created w h e r e I w o u l d a p p e a r different, e x c e p t i o n a l . Because society n e e d e d it t o be so. B e c a u s e i f p e o p l e started living o u t their fantasies, a n d refusing t o accept the fruitless b o r e d o m t h a t is offered t h e m as n o r m a l i t y , t h e y w o u l d b e c o m e h a r d t o c o n t r o l . (238) Tracks raises u n a n s w e r e d q u e s t i o n s a b o u t D a v i d s o n ' s c o l l a b o r a t i o n i n the m y t h o l o g i e s o f " e x c e p t i o n a l i t y " she seeks so u r g e n t l y t o d i s c l a i m . N e v e r t h e l e s s , h e r u n e a s i n e s s w i t h t h e g e n r e i n w h i c h s h e is w o r k i n g , a n d her readiness t o expose that genre t o internal critique, are valuable correctives t o those travel n a r r a t i v e s — a n d here b o t h w o m e n a n d m e n are implicated that d r a w attention t o themselves ( a n d their writers) as s a l e a b l e c o m m o d i t i e s a n d ( h a t p r o f i t u n a s h a m e d l y f r o m m a r k e t a b l e romantic myths. T w o e x a m p l e s o f t h i s l a t t e r k i n d o f t r a v e l wrilini?, a r c I , u c y I r v i n e ' s l.U'NI»tH ANI> nj'MI'H
I H O l ' M I'N
U;|
Castaway (1983) a n d J o a n a M c l n t y r e V a r a w a ' s Changes in Latitude (1989). I r v i n e ' s a n d V a r a w a ' s t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s a r e p e r h a p s b e s t s e e n as exercises i n c o n t r o l l e d s e l f - c o n g r a t u l a t i o n , a i m e d a t a c o m m e r c i a l m a r k e t that k n o w s h o w t o retail W e s t e r n " i s l a n d p a r a d i s e " m y t h s . B o t h writers celebrate their o w n ability t o survive in, a n d a d a p t t h e m selves t o , a w h o l l y u n f a m i l i a r e n v i r o n m e n t ; s c o r n i n g the n o n c o m m i t t a l a t t i t u d e o f t h e l e i s u r e d t r a v e l e r o r , still w o r s e , t h e t o u r i s t , I r v i n e a n d V a r a w a take o n demanding—self-consciously heroic—roles: I r v i n e as a " c a s t a w a y " o n t h e t i n y P a c i f i c i s l a n d o f T u i n , V a r a w a as a n " i n i t i a t e " i n t o t h e F i j i a n w a y o f life s h e h a s a d o p t e d b y m a r r y i n g a local fisherman. I n w r i t i n g a b o u t their respective experiences, Irvine a n d V a r a w a c o n f r o n t t h e p a r a d o x o f seeking independence t h r o u g h apparentlyd e p e n d e n t m e a n s . I r v i n e ' s o n e - y e a r stay o n T u i n results f r o m h e r a n s w e r i n g the call t o j o i n E n g l i s h eccentric a n d l a t t e r - d a y C r u s o e G e r a l d K i n g s l a n d , n o t j u s t a s h i s W o m a n F r i d a y b u t as h i s w i f e — a r o l e t h a t , a s s h e d i s c o v e r s , b r i n g s w i t h it t h e u s u a l " c o n j u g a l o b l i g a t i o n s . " V a r a w a , m e a n w h i l e , a d o p t s a n o t h e r culture as h e r o w n , b u t i n s o d o i n g loses m u c h o f t h e i n d e p e n d e n c e s h e h a d p r e v i o u s l y e n j o y e d , as a single w o m a n i n t h e i n d i v i d u a l i s t i c — a n d s u p p o s e d l y " l i b e r a t e d " — s o c i e t y o f h e r n a t i v e U n i t e d S t a t e s . Castaway a n d Changes in Latitude c a n b e s e e n , t h e n , as s e m i - i r o n i c c o n t e m p l a t i o n s o n t h e n a t u r e o f f r e e d o m : as e x p l o r a t i o n s , m e d i a t e d t h r o u g h t h e escapist c o n v e n t i o n s o f travel writing, o f the cultural relativities o f i n d e p e n d e n c e . I r v i n e a n d V a r a w a assert their i n d e p e n d e n c e , i n part, b y m a n i p u lating the m a l e c o n v e n t i o n s o f travel w r i t i n g t o serve their o w n ends. Irvine, o n T u i n t o p l a y the part o f W o m a n F r i d a y t o K l n g s l a n d ' s C r u s o e , f o r g e t s t o r e a d t h e s c r i p t , a n d b e c o m e s i n s t e a d a k i n d o f selfa p p o i n t e d i s l a n d m o n a r c h : " T u i n l a d y . " T h e " c a s t a w a y " m y t h is f e m i n i z e d as I r v i n e , t a k i n g o v e r f r o m t h e w o e f u l l y i n a d e q u a t e K i n g s l a n d , plays o u t p r o p r i e t a r y fantasies o n a n otherwise u n i n h a b i t e d island, a n d r e g a r d s t h a t i s l a n d as " a p r i v a t e s p a c e , r e m o t e f r o m t h e rest o f t h e w o r l d , i n w h i c h a n y t h i n g c o u l d h a p p e n " (17). F o r V a r a w a , a s f o r I r v i n e , " h e r " i s l a n d ( G a l o a ) is " r o m a n t i c a l l y r e m o t e " (1); t h e o p p o r t u n i t y f o r r o m a n c e is t h e n p u s h e d f u r t h e r w h e n V a r a w a m e e t s a l o c a l fisherman a n d , after a w h i r l w i n d courtship, marries h i m a n d begins t o l e a r n " t h e p s y c h i c r e a l i t y o f a n o t h e r w a y " (219). Q u i t e h o w V a r a w a proposes t o learn "the Fijian w a y " w i t h o u t learning the Fijian lan guage remains a mystery. W e are given to understand, nonetheless,
1 .'.4
T O I J H I N T S W i l l i T Y I ' H W H I I I UN
that t h r o u g h a c o m b i n a t i o n o f sensory experience a n d a n t h r o p o l o g i cal r e a d i n g s a b o u t " p r i m i t i v e " c u l t u r e s , V a r a w a e v e n t u a l l y a r r i v e s a t an intuitive grasp o f the "essence" o f F i j i a n culture; a n d at a n a w a r e ness t h a t s h e a n d h e r n e w h u s b a n d , c o l l i d i n g " l i k e m u t e p l a n e t s i n t h e n i g h t , i n a q u i e t e x p l o s i o n o f d a r k a n d l i g h t " (55), a r e " b r i d g i n g a g a p d e e p e r t h a n d i f f e r e n c e i n l a n g u a g e , a d e e p s e a - t r e n c h t h a t lies b e t w e e n o u r c u l t u r e s " (227). A s t h e f l o r i d p r o s e s u g g e s t s , V a r a w a ' s n a r r a t i v e belongs t o t h e rarefied w o r l d o f exotic r o m a n c e ; y e t , like Irvine, she m a n i p u l a t e s a genre t h a t h a s o f t e n b e e n u s e d t o cater t o m a l e f a n t a s i e s , t u r n i n g it i n s t e a d i n t o a n o u t l e t f o r h e r o w n p r e v i o u s l y repressed e m o t i o n a l n e e d s . ' 4
W h a t is m o s t a p p a r e n t i n b o t h n a r r a t i v e s , t h o u g h , is t h e flagrant e x h i b i t i o n i s m o f t h e i r w r i t e r s — a f l a u n t i n g o f self, i n V a r a w a ' s c a s e , t h a t belies h e r d e s i r e t o n a r r o w c u l t u r a l d i v i d e s . Castaway is c o n structed, i n p a r t , o u t o f clippings f r o m Irvine's "secret" diary: a n effec tive m e a n s o f " r e v e a l i n g " herself t o a m i l d l y stimulated readership. Less a sharing o f intimacies, then, than a baring o f them; a n d Irvine certainly wastes n o time in literally shedding h e r clothes, declaring her self w i t h e x c r u c i a t i n g c a n d o r t o b e a n u n r e g e n e r a t e s u n - w o r s h i p e r , r e a d y ( a n d c a n w e d o u b t it?) t o " c o m m i t a d u l t e r y w i t h a s u n b e a m " (125). I r v i n e ' s t i t i l l a t i n g g e s t u r e s a n d s o f t - p o r n p o s t u r i n g {Castaway includes several p h o t o g r a p h s o f t h e scantily clad a u t h o r ) m o c k t h e same (male?) readers t h e y a p p e a r t o b e attracting, as d o h e r p l a y f u l reiteration o f m a l e p i o n e e r i n g cliches a n d h e r p a r o d i c c a p i t u l a t i o n t o erotic m a l e fantasies (as in h e r pledge o f allegiance t o a "phallic m u s h r o o m ! " [166]). T h e s e i r o n i c t r i b u t e s t o m a l e h o o d a r e e n t e r t a i n i n g e n o u g h ; less e n d e a r i n g is h e r s u p e r i o r a t t i t u d e t o w a r d t h e n e i g h b o r i n g (Torres Strait) Islanders w h o " i n v a d e " T u i n , daring t o land o n a n i s l a n d s h e t h i n k s is h e r s — t h e site o f " h e r s u r v i v a l p r o j e c t " — b u t t h a t is b y e n t i t l e m e n t theirs a n d that, like t h e islands t h a t s u r r o u n d it, consti t u t e s t h e i r p r i m a r y s o u r c e o f s u s t e n a n c e . V a r a w a is g u i l t y , l i k e w i s e , o f p u t t i n g h e r o w n desires a n d fantasies a b o v e t h e needs o f t h e p e o p l e w h o s e g u e s t s h e i n i t i a l l y is, a n d o n w h o s e g e n e r o s i t y s h e c o n t i n u e s t o rely. T h u s , e v e n after t h e n o v e l t y h a s w o r n o f f o f b e i n g " a star a t t r a c t i o n , o b j e c t o f s p e c u l a t i o n a n d d e s i r e " (9), s h e m a i n t a i n s h e r selfi m p o r t a n c e b y s w i t c h i n g roles t o G r e a t C o n c i l i a t o r — a n e m i s s a r y o f Hie ( w h i t e ) c i v i l i z a t i o n she r e c o g n i z e s as b e i n g f l a w e d , b u t w h o s e gift o f " r e a s o n " s h e c a n still f i n d il in h e r s e l f t o b e s t o w o n h e r y o u n g e r , volatile h u s b a n d .
W h a t I w i l l t e a c h h i m is u n c e r t a i n ; a g e n t l e r s e n s e , a k i n d l i n e s s , I h o p e . M o s t l y I w a n t t o t e a c h h i m t h a t t h e r e is n o n e e d f o r t h a t d a r k ness to enter his eyes, the darkness that blots o u t t h o u g h t a n d reason, t h a t m a k e s h i m w a n t t o s m a s h a n d h i t a n d flow w i t h b l o o d , t o w a s h clean with anger.
(37)
W h a t I r v i n e a n d , particularly, V a r a w a a p p a r e n t l y fail t o c o m p r e h e n d is t h a t t h e d i f f e r e n c e s t h e y p e r c e i v e b e t w e e n t h e i r o w n " d e v e l o p e d " societies a n d t h e r e l a t i v e l y " b a c k w a r d " i s l a n d societies t h e y e n c o u n t e r are differences they ( a n d , indirectly, the b o o k s they h a v e written) help p r o d u c e . I r v i n e , a t l e a s t , is a w a r e o f h e r o w n e s c a p i s t p r o c l i v i t i e s ; b u t despite h e r f r e q u e n t self-irony, h e r m o c k i n g awareness o f herself as "less o f a G r e a t
British
Adventurer than a Small
International
E s c a p i s t " (139), I r v i n e s e e m s r e l u c t a n t t o t a k e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r c o n tributing toward thediscrepancy between First and T h i r d Worlds—the s a m e d i s c r e p a n c y o n w h i c h h e r n a r r a t i v e o f isolation a n d its c o m m e r c i a l v i a b i l i t y s o o b v i o u s l y d e p e n d . A f t e r all, h e r s t a y o n T u i n is a carefully orchestrated touristic event; a n d as J o h n F r o w points o u t , " t h e l o g i c o f t o u r i s m is t h a t o f a r e l e n t l e s s e x t e n s i o n o f c o m m o d i t y relations a n d the consequent inequalities o f p o w e r between center a n d periphery, First a n d T h i r d Worlds, developed a n d underdeveloped r e g i o n s " (151). T h e i s o l a t i o n o f T u i n , a n d t h e a p p a r e n t b a c k w a r d n e s s o f T o r r e s Strait Island culture, m a y be attractive t o I r v i n e because they s e e m s o d i f f e r e n t , s o r e m o v e d f r o m t h e w o r l d s h e k n o w s . Y e t as F r o w t e r s e l y c o n c l u d e s ( v i a S u s a n B u c k - M o r s s ) , it is " p r e c i s e l y t h e lack o f d e v e l o p m e n t w h i c h m a k e s a n a r e a a t t r a c t i v e as a t o u r i s t g o a l " ( q t d . i n F r o w 151).
15
V a r a w a , f o r h e r p a r t , seeks t o a b s o l v e h e r s e l f f r o m t h e s t i g m a s associated w i t h W e s t e r n tourism b y " g o i n g n a t i v e " : b y a d o p t i n g a n o t h e r c u l t u r e a s i f it w e r e h e r o w n . W h i l e t h e g e s t u r e s b e h i n d h e r a t t e m p t a t cultural conversion are clearly heartfelt, t h e m a n n e r in w h i c h t h e y a r e d e s c r i b e d is s u s p e c t i n t h e e x t r e m e . T h u s , w h i l e s h e r e p e a t e d l y states h e r w i s h t o d i s s o c i a t e h e r s e l f f r o m t h e " m a t e r i a l W e s t , " she reinforces t h e Islanders' p e r c e p t i o n o f h e r b y p l a y i n g t h e part o f w e a l t h y benefactor. V a r a w a b u y s her h u s b a n d M a l e clothes, a s p e a r g u n , a b o a t : s h o u l d s h e r e a l l y e x p e c t h i m n o t t o see h e r a s a n affluent Westerner? V a r a w a acknowledges t h e d i l e m m a : " I realized t h a t I k n e w n o t h i n g , " s h e s a y s a f t e r b u y i n g M a l e m e d i c i n e t h a t h e is unable t o stomach, a n d " c o u l d o n l y offer the coldness o f m o n e y a n d t h e b u r d e n o f g u i l t t h a t a c c o m p a n i e s it. . . . T h e useless m e d i c i n e s t a i n i n g his face in t h e l i g h t o f t h e ii.U
flashlight
seemed to say to m e , y o u a r e
1 0 1 1 ui,s 1'. W I T H I vi'l'iWin 1 " 1
w r o n g , J o a n a , y o u have n o heart, only a wallet t o trade f o r l o v e " (82-83). S u c h i n s t a n c e s o f b l e e d i n g - h e a r t l i b e r a l i s m o n l y e m p h a s i z e V a r a w a ' s dependence o n the material culture o f the W e s t ; behind her a t t e m p t t o b r i d g e t h e g a p b e t w e e n t w o " v a s t l y d i f f e r e n t " c u l t u r e s lies an awareness, albeit repressed, o f the e c o n o m i c s u p r e m a c y o f her o w n . V a r a w a ' s rhetoric o f reconciliation—a rhetoric derived n o t so m u c h f r o m h e r u n i v e r s i t y a n t h r o p o l o g y t e x t b o o k s as f r o m t h e a r c h e t y p e s o f light a n d d a r k that p e r m e a t e J u n g i a n p o p p s y c h o l o g y — c a n n o t dis guise the u n e q u a l p o w e r relations b e t w e e n F i r s t a n d T h i r d w o r l d s , h e r c o u n t r y a n d M a l e ' s ; a n d i n this sense, V a r a w a ' s l o v e m a t c h , a l o n g w i t h t h e n a r r a t i v e t h a t p r e s e n t s it, o n l y h e l p s i r o n i c a l l y t o d r i v e t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e societies f u r t h e r a p a r t . Changes in Latitude is p e r h a p s b e s t s e e n a s a n e x e r c i s e i n f l a g r a n t c u l t u r a l v o y e u r i s m , a n a d a p t a t i o n o f a n t h r o p o l o g i c a l t r o p e s t o selfingratiating ends. T h e F i j i a n islands satisfy V a r a w a ' s c h i l d h o o d fasci nation w i t h the "primitive," a fascination nurtured b y the (limited) a n t h r o p o l o g i c a l k n o w l e d g e she h a s a c q u i r e d a b o u t " e x o t i c c u l t u r e s . " V a r a w a seems t o use a n t h r o p o l o g y p r i m a r i l y as a m e a n s o f legitimat i n g h e r e r o t i c f a n t a s i e s ; a n d i n s o f a r as t h e t e x t c a n b e s e e n a t a l l as c o n v e y i n g e t h n o g r a p h i c i n f o r m a t i o n , it d o e s s o t h r o u g h t h e filter o f " s o f t primitivist" r o m a n c e . I n a typical passage, V a r a w a , while sitting d r i n k i n g yaqona ( a l o c a l c o n c o c t i o n ) w i t h M a l e ' s f r i e n d s a n d f a m i l y , casts f u r t i v e g l a n c e s a t t h e m e n s i t t i n g w i t h s u c h c o m f o r t o n t h e g r a s s , noting 1 6
strong bodies, m u s c u l a r a r m s a n d chests, the seductive careless w a y t h e y w r a p t h e i r sulit w h e n t h e y g e t u p , t h e p e r v a s i v e c o u r t e s y o f t h e i r t a l k a n d m o t i o n . A timeless g r a c e drifts here, a n eternal d r e a m
time
of people comfortable with where they are a n d w i t h each other.
(90)
F o r a l l i t s p r e t e n s i o n s t o a n t h r o p o l o g i c a l a c c u r a c y , its o n - t h e - s p o t explanations o f local customs a n d events t o a n u n a c c u s t o m e d audi ence, Changes in Latitude is b e s t seen a s r o m a n t i c t r a v e l o g u e — a n d i n its m o s t m e l o d r a m a t i c v e i n . I n its d e t e r m i n a t i o n t o e x o t i c i z e its P a c i f i c island e n v i r o n m e n t , t o p l a y self-consciously o n E u r o p e a n paratlisal m y t h s , Changes in Latitude p r o b a b l y o w e s as m u c h t o t h e l u r i d talcs o f R o b e r t L o u i s S t e v e n s o n as it d o e s to t h e m e t i c u l o u s o b s e r v a t i o n s o f its m o r e o b v i o u s model, M a r g a r e t M e a d . ' L i k e Irvine, V a r a w a m a n i p u lates E u r o p e a n c o n v e n t i o n s o f t h e t r o p i c a l i s l a n d p a r a d i s e s o a s to c a t e r t o h e r o w n d e s i r e s a n d liiiiliisuiN. I n thin HCIIIKC, ill least, b o t h w r i t ers p r o v i d e a l t e r n a t i v e s | o l i i n l i t i n u i i l b n u t l r o h m i c d m y t h s : the 7
1 ,I
M
I L|
II
-\ !•.
I
I
I I PI
I
1
I ' M
I
resourceful castaway c o m i n g t o terms with, a n d eventually conquer ing, " h i s " island; the irresistible h e r o seducing " h i s " d u s k y m a i d e n ; a n d so o n . I n a n o t h e r s e n s e , h o w e v e r , b o o k s l i k e Castaway a n d Changes in Latitude s h o w t h e c o n t i n u i t i e s b e t w e e n w o m e n ' s t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s a n d the masculinist p a r a d i g m s o f conquest they seemingly wish t o disavow. B o t h n a r r a t i v e s seek t o m a k e capital o u t o f a k i n d o f c u l t u r a l v o y e u r i s m , a n d t o m a r k e t themselves as quests f o r " f r e e d o m " f r o m t h e i r o w n ( a n d t h e i r r e a d e r s ' ) societies. B o t h n a r r a t i v e s c o n t r a d i c t t h e antimaterialist pretensions o f their writers, merely accentuating the a f f l u e n c e o f t h e societies t o w h i c h t h e y b e l o n g . B o t h n a r r a t i v e s , f i n a l l y , place a n emphasis o n fantasies o f individual achievement, advertising the exploits o f their intrepid traveler-writers a n d exhibiting, h o w e v e r i r o n i c a l l y , t h e i r i n d e p e n d e n c e , c o u r a g e , s t r e n g t h . I t is u n f a i r , p e r h a p s , to bracket the b o o k s o f Irvine a n d V a r a w a w i t h those of, say, M u r p h y or D a v i d s o n : writers w h o are m o r e o b v i o u s l y a w a r e o f the b r o a d e r implications o f travel writing, a n d whose w o r k s arguably reach out t o a m o r e d e m a n d i n g , c r i t i c a l a u d i e n c e . Castaway a n d Changes in Lati tude a r e , h o w e v e r , b y n o m e a n s u n t y p i c a l o f a c e r t a i n k i n d o f m i d d l e b r o w travel narrative, one that continues t o enjoy considerable c o m m e r c i a l success. T h i s t y p e o f n a r r a t i v e u n a b a s h e d l y s u p p l i e s e s c a p i s t e n t e r t a i n m e n t , d e l i v e r i n g T h i r d W o r l d e x o t i c a t o its t a r g e t F i r s t W o r l d r e a d e r s h i p , b u t e i t h e r t e m p e r i n g its c u l t u r a l v o y e u r i s m w i t h a m e a s u r e o f s e l f - i r o n y o r a s s i m i l a t i n g it t o t h e w r i t e r ' s a l l e g e d l y c a t h a r t i c p e r sonal quest. I n the e n d , narratives like these d o n o t so m u c h celebrate i n d e p e n d e n c e as r e i n f o r c e t h e i r w r i t e r s ' ( a n d r e a d e r s ' ) ties t o t h e s o c i eties f r o m w h i c h t h e y w i s h t o e s c a p e . A n d t h e w r i t e r s t h e m s e l v e s k n o w t h i s ; f o r t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s o f t e n c o n t a i n a n e l e m e n t o f strategic w i s h f u l f i l l m e n t , a n d w h i l e it m a y b e t r u e t h a t I r v i n e a n d V a r a w a , a n d o t h ers l i k e t h e m , a r e " r e a c h i n g f o r a k i n d o f l i b e r t y " ( M e l c h e t t 3 ) , it a l s o seems that t h e y e n d u p c o n v e r t i n g potentially liberating narratives into self-admiring confessions a n d recycled versions o f m a r k e t a b l e r o m a n tic m y t h s . Irvine's a n d V a r a w a ' s travel narratives, focusing o n the " o t h e r e d " b o d y , assimilate " p r i m i t i v e " experience t o the dictates o f W e s t e r n c o m m o d i t y culture. Irvine's b o d y , in " n a t i v e " posture, turns into a vehicle f o r c o n s u m p t i o n , j u s t as t h e F i j i a n s ' s e d u c t i v e b o d i e s b e c o m e c o m m o d i f i e d objects o f desire. T h i s " o t h e r i n g " o f the T h i r d W o r l d b o d y , o r o f its s i m u l a c r a l r e p r e s e n t a t i o n , is c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f m e t r o p o l i t a n travel narratives that aestheticize their m a r g i n a l subjects.'" S a r a S u l e r i ' s p o e t i c a l a u t o b i o g r a p h y Meatless D a y s ( l ' ) K ' i ) p r o v i d e s a n 1 •:;
lOUItlHT.N W l i 0 1 < • 1 WHITIIMS
alternative to this model: one in which the b o d y remains a focal point—an instrument—for w o m e n ' s travel narrative, without being turned into and exploited as an "otherness machine" (105). Meatless Days arguably belongs to a category of postcolonial autobiography in which the autobiographical subject is grafted onto a wider ethnic or "creolized" community (Lionnet). Suleri's w o r k , however, is distinc tive in that it utilizes travel as a metaphor for the dispersal o f its subject in both time (history) and space. 19
Travel has many connotations in Suleri's intricately structured text. O n one level, travel refers to the diasporic movements o f Suleri's family: across various cities, countries, continents; across linguistic and cultural borders. (Suleri's Pakistani father and Welsh mother form the nodes around which a multicultural family organizes itself, is disas sembled, partially coheres.) O n another level, the text itself is a densely patterned geographic circuit, traversing a variety o f physical and cul tural bodies, mapping out arcane itineraries and complex structures o f speech and thought. A n d on still another, the b o d y itself constitutes its own private geography: it has its o w n distributing mechanisms, its o w n structured patterns of response; and in acting on other bodies, it also has its o w n communicative signals: its register o f facial gestures, its semiology of touch. Meatless Days, as a travel text, traces the m o v e ments within the b o d y as it acts upon, and is acted upon by, the various environments that surround it; but it also records the movements between separate, related bodies as they interact with one another at different times or in a different space. These movements take place across cultural borders in what is clearly a transnational space; in this sense, Meatless Days interrogates t he kind o f national (travel) narrative that it associates with ethnocenI ric vision and a patriarchal view o f place. Such a view is affectionately ironized through the treatment of Suleri's father, an itinerant journal ist committed to the cause of the Pakistani nation but "in too many places at once, recounting different histories for e a c h " (112). A b o v e all, though, Meatless Days enacts a family romance between different women's bodies: Suleri's and her sisters'; her sisters' and her mother's; all o f theirs and their maternal grandmother's. These intimate connec tions establish a bond o f shared affection that persists despite the tur bulence o f a new nation's (Pakistan's) history and the pressures o f a family in bereavement, often, and almost always displaced. Suleri's text mourns personal losses while seeking out new paths and connec tions; it refuses to succumb 1.0 w i l f u l n e s s or the paralysis o f nostalgia, I N U I ' . H A M I 1
I '<)
tracing alternative histories—and geographies—to that o f "return." S o m u c h is c l e a r f r o m t h e t r e a t m e n t o f S u l e r i ' s s c h o o l f r i e n d M u s t a k o r i , herself a resolute transient w h o s e passport stamps rival Suleri's o w n (Tanzania, K e n y a , Pakistan, Ireland, England, A m e r i c a , China). M u s t a k o r i m a k e s the m i s t a k e o f returning t o the c o u n t r y o f her ancestry: " T h o s e w h o t r a v e l c u r i o u s l y i m a g i n e t h a t r e t u r n i n g is s o m e h o w s w e e t e r , less d a n g e r o u s t h a n s e e k i n g o u t s o m e n o v e l h i s t o r y , a n d M u s t a k o r i e v i d e n t l y h a d s u c h n o s t a l g i a e n c o d e d i n h e r g e n e s " (49). I n e v i t a b l y , s h e is d i s a p p o i n t e d ; r e t u r n o n l y b r i n g s f u r t h e r d e p a r t u r e , b u t a life o f d e d i c a t e d t r a v e l leaves h e r " u n t a i n t e d b y e x p e r i e n c e , as t h o u g h her w i s d o m consisted in r e m a i n i n g p u r e o f a n y k n o w l e d g e that t r a v e l p r e t e n d e d t o c o n f e r " (66). S u l e r i ' s i r o n y , o f c o u r s e , is t h a t m u c h m o r e caustic f o r b e i n g p a r t l y self-directed; she r e c o g n i z e s h e r o w n life o f t r a n s i e n c e a n d t h e e m p t y w i s d o m it b r i n g s . I f r e t u r n f o s t e r s i l l u s i o n s , s o t o o d o e s d e p a r t u r e w i t h its f a l s e p r o m i s e s ; S u l e r i ' s n a r r a t i v e oscillates energetically b e t w e e n u n a c c e p t a b l e alternatives, u n a b l e , like its n a r r a t o r , t o settle f o r o n e c o n s i s t e n t c o d e . T h e f o l l o w i n g e x c h a n g e b e t w e e n S u l e r i a n d h e r sister T i l l a t , w h o h a s " s e t t l e d " i n K u w a i t , is instructive: " S a r a , y o u m u s t learn h o w to settle n o w . " S h e w a s t a l k i n g a b o u t
the
stringent g r a c e s o f m o n o g a m y . " O h sister m o s t m o n o g a m o u s , "
my
b r a i n g r o a n e d , " h o w c a n I t e l l y o u w h a t it i s t o h a v e a h a n d
upon
y o u r head that shapes itself unwittingly to s o m e o n e else's c r a n i u m , so t h a t e v e r y n e r v e e n d o f f i d e l i t y i n y o u l e a p s u p t o e x c l a i m , ' T h i s is n o t the c u p m y skull requires?'"
. . . [M]y time to stay w a s done.
w r e n c h e d m e to leave her a n d
her brood:
t h e m , t h o s e s e t t l e r s in t h e d u s t .
(83)
talking creatures
It
all o f
S u l e r i ' s n a r r a t i v e , d e s p i t e its f o c u s o n P a k i s t a n , is c h a r a c t e r i z e d b y a d e t e r m i n e d c o s m o p o l i t a n i s m t h a t w o r r i e s fixed i d e n t i t a r y c a t e g o r i e s , blurring the boundaries between " s e l f a n d " o t h e r . " " I ' v e lived m a n y y e a r s as a n o t h e r n e s s m a c h i n e , " s h e c o m p l a i n s t o h e r b r o t h e r S h a h i d , " h a d m o r e t h a n m y f a i r s h a r e o f b e i n g o t h e r " (112). S u l e r i , w h o c u r r e n t l y t e a c h e s T h i r d W o r l d l i t e r a t u r e a t Y a l e , is w e l l p o s i t i o n e d t o c o m m e n t o n the ironies o f the a c a d e m i c " a l t e r i t y i n d u s t r y . " I n h e r crit i c a l s t u d y , The Rhetoric of English India (1992), t h e s e i r o n i e s a r e m a d e explicit: " [ A ] l t e r i t i s m begins as a critical a n d theoretical revision o f a E u r o c e n t r i c o r Orientalist s t u d y o f the literatures o f colonialism, b u t its i n d i s c r i m i n a t e r e l i a n c e o n t h e c e n t r a l i t y o f o t h e r n e s s t e n d s t o r e p l i cate w h a t i n the c o n t e x t o f imperialist discourse w a s the f a m i l i a r cate g o r y o f t h e e x o t i c " (12). S u l e r i is o n l y t o o w e l l a w a r e t h a t h e r o w n IV>
I O H K I M S WITH TVI'l',wmH!H!t
w o r k , l i k e t h e s u b j e c t s h e t e a c h e s , r i s k s b e i n g a p p r e c i a t e d p r i m a r i l y for its e x o t i c c a c h e t . Meatless Days, i n t h i s c o n t e x t , r e a c t s p r e e m p t i v e l y a g a i n s t its o w n r e c e p t i o n ; its n a r r a t i v e o f p o s t c o l o n i a l t r a n s i e n c e c h a l l e n g e s t h e c o m m o d i f i e d d i s t i n c t i o n b e t w e e n " s e l f " a n d " o t h e r , " reject ing a wholesale v i e w o f difference that " p a y s n o a t t e n t i o n t o the cul t u r a l n u a n c e s t h a t d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n i m p l i e s , " a n d r e l o c a t i n g it i n s t e a d a t t h e site w h e r e a c o l o n i a l / p o s t c o l o n i a l h i s t o r y is p l a y e d o u t a n d r e e n acted across the g e n d e r e d ( a n d / o r ethnicized) b o d y . F o r Suleri, as f o r M a r y M o r r i s , memories are channeled t h r o u g h the b o d y : e m b o d i m e n t is n o t j u s t a n a n a l o g u e f o r t h e i n c o r p o r a t i o n o f e x p e r i e n c e b u t a m n e m o n i c device f o r the recuperation o f a personal o r collective past. I n Meatless Days, e m b o d i m e n t f u n c t i o n s as a k i n d o f c o u n t e r m e m o r y t h a t sets i t s e l f o v e r a n d a g a i n s t t h e p o l i t i c s o f c u l t u r a l n o s t a l g i a . Suleri's text travels b a c k in time, n o t t o recover a n i m a g i n e d w h o l e ness, b u t t o c o n s t r u c t a l t e r n a t i v e h i s t o r i e s t o t h e o n e s i n s c r i b e d i n official records—histories that w e r e w r i t t e n o v e r , a n d are n o w rewrit ten b y , the female b o d y . 2 0
T h e s e abstractions d o n o t d o justice t o t h e sensual i m m e d i a c y o f Suleri's w r i t i n g o r t o the intricacy o f a prose t h a t aspires t o , a n d s o m e times reaches, t h e height o f lyric. T h e y indicate, nonetheless, that a case c a n b e m a d e f o r s e e i n g Meatless Days, n o t j u s t as a n i d i o s y n c r a t i c a u t o b i o g r a p h y o r m e m o i r , b u t as a self-consciously gendered travel n a r r a t i v e t h a t raises s e v e r a l i m p o r t a n t q u e s t i o n s : a b o u t t h e p o s i t i o n i n g o f t h e traveling subject w i t h i n a rhetoric o f displacement ( t o u r i s m , m i g r a t i o n , e x p a t r i a t i o n , etc.), a n d a b o u t t h e n e e d t o u n d e r s t a n d t h e p a s t , b o t h i n its b r o a d e r s w e e p o r t r a j e c t o r y a n d i n t h e m u l t i p l e , e m b o d i e d m i c r o n a r r a t i v e s t h a t g o t o m a k e u p w h a t w e call history. Meatless Days p r o v i d e s a r e m i n d e r , a s w e l l , n o t o n l y t h a t w o m e n travel differently, b u t that their j o u r n e y s can be used t o install "differ e n c e " i n t o t h e m o d e r n c u l t u r e o f t r a v e l . A n d t h i s is a c u l t u r e , as I n d e r p a l G r e w a l r e m i n d s u s , t h a t is i n m u c h n e e d o f r e a s s e s s m e n t : T h e r e is m u c h in the culture o f travel that needs e x a m i n a t i o n . . . . P a r ticularly in the area o f sexuality, m o r e texts that a t t e m p t t o d e c o l o nize c u l t u r a l a n d n a t i o n a l f o r m s are necessary, creating narratives o f the travel o f sexualities t h a t w o u l d , once a g a i n , fracture disciplinary practices t h a t were part o f E u r o p e a n m o d e r n i t y a n d colonial m o d e r nities. (232) S u l e r i ' s is o n e s u c h t e x t , a l t h o u g h , a s h e r c r i t i c i s m w a r n s u s , " d i f f e r e n c e " s h o u l d n o t b e c o m e a c a t c h a l l a c a d e m i c c a t e g o r y t h a t enlists
<,mii'.tt - r i i i M i n i 1 •".
(ji
v a g u e l y r e l a t e d c u l t u r a l p r o d u c t s in t h e s e r v i c e o f a s e l f - c o n g r a t u l a t o r y "transgressive" cultural critique. Indeed, Suleri's narrative, placed a l o n g s i d e o t h e r s in this section, e m p h a s i z e s the e n o r m o u s differences within t h e f i e l d o f w o m e n ' s t r a v e l w r i t i n g . T h e v i e w o f w o m e n ' s t r a v e l w r i t i n g as n e c e s s a r i l y l i b e r a t i n g c l e a r l y n e e d s a d j u s t i n g j u s t as m u c h as t h e p a t r i a r c h a l m o d e l s o f i m p e r i a l t r a v e l it o f t e n c l a i m s t o d i s a v o w . W o m e n ' s t r a v e l w r i t i n g is m o r e d i f f e r e n t , b u t a l s o less d i f f e r e n t , t h a n it m i g h t s e e m : m o r e d i f f e r e n t i n s o f a r as it c o m p r i s e s a l a r g e , d i s t i n c t l y h e t e r o g e n e o u s b o d y o f t e x t s , b u t less d i f f e r e n t b e c a u s e s o m e o f t h e s e texts are entirely complicit w i t h the d o m i n a n t m o d e . T h e imperialist e x o t i c i s m t h a t S u l e r i a b j u r e s is a l s o o n e t h a t , s a y , V a r a w a p r a c t i c e s ( e v e n t h o u g h t h e c o m p a r i s o n is p e r h a p s i n v i d i o u s i n s o f a r as t h e i r t e x t s a r e a d d r e s s e d t o d i f f e r e n t a u d i e n c e s ) . O b v i o u s l y , n o t all w o m e n ' s travel narratives are f e m i n i s t — h o w e v e r w e m i g h t w a n t to define the t e r m — a n d i n t h o s e t h a t a r e , o r p r o f e s s t o b e , t h e r e is n o n e c e s s a r y l i n k b e t w e e n f e m i n i s t c r i t i q u e a n d a n t i - i m p e r i a l i s t r e v i s i o n i s m . ( T h i s is a l s o t r u e , o f c o u r s e , as w a s a r g u e d i n a n e a r l i e r c h a p t e r , f o r " p o s t c o l o n i a l " travel narratives.) A s Sara Mills has s h o w n for nineteenth-century t r a v e l w r i t i n g — a n d h e r a r g u m e n t is s u r e l y r e l e v a n t t o t h e t w e n t i e t h c e n t u r y as w e l l — i t is q u i t e p o s s i b l e t o b e d i s a d v a n t a g e d , e v e n o p pressed, w i t h respect to gender while r e m a i n i n g privileged, e v e n oppressive, w i t h respect to race, ethnicity, class. T h e c o m m o d i f i c a t i o n o f w o m e n ' s travel w r i t i n g tends t o o b s c u r e these crucial differ e n c e s , e v e n as it c e l e b r a t e s t h e w r i t e r s t h e m s e l v e s — o f t e n , p r e c i s e l y , f o r being " d i f f e r e n t . " M a n y o f the best w o m e n travel writers, h o w e v e r , are m u c h m o r e self-awarc t h a n the anthologies give t h e m credit for; a n d s e v e r a l o f t h e s e , u n f o r t u n a t e l y , h a v e g o n e u n r e p r e s e n t e d i n t h i s sec t i o n . W r i t e r s as d i f f e r e n t as C h r i s t i n a D o d w e l l , B a r b a r a G r i z z u t i H a r r i s o n , S a r a W h e e l e r , a n d , f r o m a n earlier p e r i o d , F r e y a S t a r k , are well a w a r e , like M u r p h y or D a v i d s o n o r (at the fringes o f the genre) Suleri, that the traveling subject—a c o m p o s i t e o f the variety o f rhetor ical p o s i t i o n s a v a i l a b l e t o t r a v e l e r - w r i t e r s — i s i r r e d u c i b l y c o m p l e x : t h a t it is s i t u a t e d firmly b u t s u b t l y w i t h i n t h e r a c e - c l a s s - g e n d e r n e x u s ; t h a t it s h a p e s , b u t is a l s o s h a p e d b y , w i d e r s o c i a l , h i s t o r i c a l , a n d i d e o l o g i c a l f o r c e s . T h e t r a v e l i n g s u b j e c t is a l w a y s g e n d e r e d , a l w a y s e m b o d i e d , a n d a l w a y s active: r e c o g n i z i n g this, m a n y w o m e n t r a v e l w r i t e r s — a l t h o u g h b y n o m e a n s a l l — h a v e turned their narratives into critical e x p l o r a t i o n s o f b o t h the potential for a n d limitations o f female a g e n c y in t h e c o n t e m p o r a r y w o r l d . 2 1
22
2 3
I t"
TOIIiaSTN Willi
W U I II l"L
TRANSGRESSION, GAY
MALE
PERFORMATIVITY, TRAVELING
AND
THE
SUBJECT
T h e a g e n c y o f t r a v e l e r - w r i t e r s i m p l i e s a set o f p r i v i l e g e s — p r i v i l e g e s , though, that are almost invariably occluded in travel narratives. M o s t o b v i o u s l y , privilege consists i n t h e possession o f r e a d y m o n e y , p a r t i c u larly f o r u n p l a n n e d trips. M o n e y allows the traveler t o decide o n , b u t also t o d i v e r g e f r o m , d e s t i n a t i o n s a n d r o u t e s ; it also b e s t o w s p o w e r o n t h e t r a v e l e r a t v a r i o u s sites a l o n g t h e w a y , a p o w e r t h a t t h e r e s i d e n t native o f t e n expects h i m o r h e r t o exercise b y passing a l o n g a m o d i c u m o f w e a l t h . I n m a n y cases, t h e n a t i v e ' s p u r c h a s e in t h e s i t u a t i o n o f b e i n g t r a v e l e d upon d e p e n d s o n t h e a b i l i t y t o w r e s t m o n e y f r o m a t e m p o r a r y patron. T h i s patronage relationship remains a n unequal one. A l l the s a m e , i t a s s u m e s a c e r t a i n s y m m e t r y : t h e t r a v e l e r is p r e p a r e d t o d i s p e n s e l a r g e s s e i f i t w i l l p e r m i t licenses n o t a v a i l a b l e a t h o m e ; w h i l e t h e n a t i v e r e c i p r o c a t e s w i t h g o o d s a n d s e r v i c e s , w h e r e t h e r e c o m p e n s e is s i g n i f i c a n t a n d c u l t u r a l i n t e g r i t y is u l t i m a t e l y n o t a t s t a k e . A l t h o u g h recent travel narratives a n d c o m m e n t a r y are gradually a d j u s t i n g t h e d o m i n a n t p a r a d i g m , i t is still t r u e t h a t m o s t o f t h e world's producers o f travel narratives are white heterosexual males w h o enjoy considerable economic privilege a n d , even w h e n they h a v e responsibilities, t h e c a p a c i t y t o s h u c k these o f f , a t least t e m p o r a r i l y . I f t r a v e l is c o m m o n l y figured as t h e e m b r a c e o f f r e e d o m , o f l i b e r a t i n g ( o r l i b e r t a r i a n ) f o r a y s i n t o less c o n s t r a i n e d l o c a l e s , it o f f e r s f r e e d o m u n d e r t h e s p o n s o r s h i p o f financial r e s o u r c e s a n d a p p a r e n t c u l t u r a l d e t a c h m e n t . O n b o t h sides, " t r a n s g r e s s i v e " liberties n e e d t o b e n e g o t i a t e d . T h e (male) traveler deploys disposable income t o obtain exotic sexual a d v e n t u r e , t h e ( f e m a l e ) n a t i v e offers services i n o r d e r t o p r o c u r e o t h e r w i s e u n a v a i l a b l e assets: i n c o m e , c o m f o r t p e r h a p s , o r s e c u r i t y i n l i v i n g arrangements. S u c h transgressions, f o r white heterosexual males, are i n e v i t a b l y b o u n d e d : t h e l i n e i n t h e s a n d is o f t e n i n d i c a t e d t h r o u g h m o m e n t s o f h o m o s e x u a l panic, w h e n the traveler reclaims cultural n o r m s b y detaching himself f r o m a h o m o s e x u a l l y c o m p r o m i s i n g situa tion. T h e s e m o m e n t s o f p a n i c also serve t o reclaim n o r m a t i v e heteroscxuality as a " h i g h e r " ( w h i t e ) cultural attribute, i n contrast w i t h t h e frequently feminized, potentially c o n t a m i n a t i n g " o t h e r " culture. C i i v e n t h e s e c i r c u m s t a n c e s , it is n o t s u r p r i s i n g t h a t t r a v e l c a n n o t b e l i n k e d t o sexual l i b e r a t i o n o r g e n d e r revision in a n y s i m p l e w a y . W r i t ers m a k i n g s u c h c l a i m s h a v e generally d o n e s o w i t h i n a m a l e h e t e r o -
(IHNHHH
A M U ui urn
i mmiti.i',!H
sexual context because o n l y that context
universal white heterosexu-
a l i t y — h a s b e e n c o m p e t e n t t o figure t h e s e x u a l l i c e n s e a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t r a v e l as t r a n s g r e s s i o n , w h i l e s h u t t i n g o u t m o r e r a d i c a l t r a n s g r e s s i o n s , projecting these b e y o n d t h e t h i n k a b l e . C o n v e r s e l y , n o w that h o m o s e x u a l i t y is n o l o n g e r i n t r i n s i c a l l y t r a n s g r e s s i v e i n w h i t e c u l t u r e s , g a y t r a v e l h a s b e c o m e a field i n i t s o w n r i g h t , c o n n e c t e d w i t h g u i d i n g g a y travelers t o f a v o r a b l e locales r a t h e r t h a n w i t h r e c o r d i n g trajectories o f s e x u a l p l a y i n m o r e o r less c o d e d d i s c o u r s e s . S u c h r e c o r d e d t r a j e c t o r i e s d o i n d e e d exist b u t , u n l i k e m o s t o t h e r texts c o n s i d e r e d i n this b o o k , t h e y are in the m a i n either historically e m b e d d e d i n earlier discourses o r a p p e a r i n stories a n d n o v e l s r a t h e r t h a n i n t r a v e l o g u e s . T h e t w o cat egories o f earlier, c o n t e x t u a l l y c o d e d discourses a n d c o n t e m p o r a r y t r a v e l fictions p r o v i d e t h e b a s i s f o r t h e f o l l o w i n g d i s c u s s i o n o f t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s as g a y a n d / o r q u e e r t e x t s . F o r t h e c o n t e m p o r a r y r e a d e r h o m o s e x u a l i t y , as figured i n t h e first t w o - t h i r d s o f t h e t w e n t i e t h c e n t u r y , is f o r t h e m o s t p a r t p r e s e n t o n l y i n i m p l i c i t a n d m a r k e d l y c o d e d t e r m s . T h e t e r m homoeroticism h a s l o n g since d o m i n a t e d t h i s l i t e r a r y r e g i o n ; o n l y d e t e r m i n e d r e t r o s p e c t i o n c a n reclaim t h e incidents a n d their n u a n c e d literary representation as " g a y . " 4 M o r e o v e r , the codes are m o s t recognizable in c o n n e c t i o n w i t h English c u l t u r e , w h e r e s e x u a l i t y a n d e r o t i c i s m o f t e n m a k e sense o n l y w h e n r e a d i n t e r m s o f class. T h e E n g l i s h p u b l i c s c h o o l , w i t h t h e p r i v i lege it g r a n t e d t o l i m i t e d f o r m s o f s a m e - s e x e n g a g e m e n t a t t h e s a m e t i m e as it p r o m o t e d h o m o p h o b i c m a s c u l i n i t y , witnesses t o this p h e n o m e n o n , a s d o e s t h e s p e c i a l a t t e n t i o n i n s o m e E n g l i s h fiction t o h o m o s e x u a l t r y s t s a c r o s s class l i n e s . I n t h i s h i s t o r i c a l p h a s e t r a v e l — literally u n d e r s t o o d — p r o v e d liberating, enabling f r a n k e r e x p l o r a t i o n o f s e x u a l i d e n t i t i e s a n d p r a c t i c e s , e v e n w h e n it w a s a m a t t e r o f e x c h a n g i n g o n e set o f c o d e s a n d c l o s e t s f o r a n o t h e r . Y e t e v e n w h e n t r a v e l ( i n its m o s t specific s e n s e ) w a s n o t i n q u e s t i o n , E n g l i s h h o m o sexuality often involved a crossing o f boundaries: o v e r into t h e e n c l o s e d w o r l d o f t h e p u b l i c s c h o o l ; a c r o s s class l i n e s ; o r i n t o a d i f f e r ent a g e g r o u p . I n the travel n a r r a t i v e s o f this p e r i o d , e v e n t h e m o s t t e n uous o f b o u n d a r y crossings can seem erotically charged. 2
25
D e n t o n W e l c h ' s a u t o b i o g r a p h i c a l fiction Maiden Voyage (1943) is a g o o d e x a m p l e . W e l c h r a n a w a y f r o m s c h o o l i n 1932, r e t u r n e d l a t e f o r his final t e r m , a n d t h e n s a i l e d t o v i s i t his b u s i n e s s m a n f a t h e r i n S h a n g h a i . W e l c h r e t r o s p e c t i v e l y stages h i s t r a v e l s a s a series o f e n c o u n t e r s w i t h i n a d i a l e c t i c o f r i s k a n d f e a r . A t first t h i n g s h a p p e n l o h i m ; t h e n increasingly he participates i n . a n d s o m e t i m e s instigates, e n c o u n t e r s .
W e l c h ' s delicate, highly aestheticized sensibility u n f o l d s these e n c o u n ters t o s u g g e s t v o y a g i n g as a m e d i u m o f s e x u a l a w a k e n i n g . H i s u n d e r stated d e c l a r a t i v e style e v o k e s erotic n u a n c e r a t h e r t h a n e x p l o r e s sex u a l a f f e c t i v i t y . R e c o r d i n g a r o u t i n e c a n i n g , f o r e x a m p l e , h e feels " t w o bars o f fire e a t i n g i n t o ice"; the light b e c o m e s " t h i c k like m i l k a n d . . . s e e m f s ] t o f l o a t c l o u d i l y a b o u t t h e r o o m " ; a n d h e feels a " s u r g e o f a d m i r a t i o n f o r [his a g g r e s s o r ] N e w m a n , " w i t h his " p o w e r f u l b o d y a n d s p r i n g y , u n c o l o u r e d h a i r " (55-56). W e l c h r e n d e r s t h i s e p i s o d e as p a r t o f a larger experiment in w h i c h the risk-seeking traveler c o m p l e m e n t s (he a e s t h e t e ' s s e a r c h f o r p e r f e c t o b j e t s d ' a r t w i t h a h o m o e r o t i c q u e s t f o r r o u g h e r m e n — s o l d i e r s , s a i l o r s , b o x e r s . Maiden Voyage c u l m i n a t e s w i t h the b o y ' s tentative ( n o n s e x u a l ) liaison w i t h a n older British sailor, a figure h e s e d u c e s i n t o f r i e n d s h i p , s i n g l i n g h i m o u t a n d i n v i t i n g h i m t o lea. T h e sailor hesitates t o enter the b o y ' s l u x u r y a p a r t m e n t , a w a r e t h a t his o f f i c e r s " m i g h t w o n d e r w h a t I w a s u p t o i n t h e r e " (202); o n c e inside, h o w e v e r , h e teaches D e n t o n t o s m o k e a n d d r i n k w h i s k e y , w h i l e his y o u n g s e d u c e r sits o n t h e s o f a ' s a r m , " l o o k [ i n g ] d o w n o v e r h i s s h o u l d e r " (204). W h e n t h e D e r b y s h i r e - b o r n s a i l o r d i s c o v e r s t h a t D e n Ion has g o n e t o school in the s a m e c o u n t y , he wistfully suggests, " W e c o u l d h a v e s o m e l o v e l y t i m e s i n D e r b y s h i r e " (260). I n t e r e s t i n g l y , m e a n w h i l e — a n d i n contrast w i t h other literary travelers o f t h e p e r i o d — W e l c h ' s attitudes t o the native C h i n e s e remains o n e o f racial a n d class c o n d e s c e n s i o n , s o m e t i m e s e s c a l a t i n g t o d i s t a s t e . W e l c h foregoes interpretation so that incidents a n d encounters, held in a b e y a n c e , enact a k i n d o f liminality w h e r e elements o f aesthet ics, a f f e c t i v i t y , a n d s e x u a l i t y f l o a t i n a d o l e s c e n t i n d e t e r m i n a c y . N o w h e r e is t h i s m o r e c l e a r l y d e m o n s t r a t e d t h a n i n a n e p i s o d e o f c r o s s dressing experimentation. G u e s t a t a neighbor's house, D e n t o n occu pies t h e r o o m o f his m a r r i e d w o m a n - f r i e n d V e s t a . S u r v e y i n g h e r j e w elry ("silver hair-pins w i t h kingfishers' feathers, rose q u a r t z , b e l l - s h a p e d d r o p s w i t h c a p s o f g i l t filigree; r i n g s c a r v e d o u t o f pieces o f j a d e a n d a g a t e ; t w o t h i c k l i t t l e tassels o f seed p e a r l s " [242]), h e w a n t s t o dress u p , a desire c o n n e c t e d w i t h a s c h o o l b o y e p i s o d e w h e n , r e t u r n i n g by train t o school, he h a d h i d d e n i n the l a v a t o r y " w o n d e r i n g i f I c o u l d d i s g u i s e m y s e l f as a w o m a n , t o e s c a p e b e i n g c a u g h t a n d s e n t b a c k t o s c h o o l " (242). N o w , h o w e v e r , h e w i s h e s n o t t o d i s g u i s e b u t t o r e m a k e h i m s e l f , a n o c c u p a t i o n " a s a b s o r b i n g a s r e d e c o r a t i n g a r o o m " (243). B u t t h e a d v e n t u r e s o o n t u r n s r i s k y w h e n a s t r a n g e r o n t h e street s e e k s directions f r o m h i m , a n d h e beats a hasty retreat t o the safety o f the house a n d Vesta's r o o m . T h e cross-dressing gesture terminates almost (ItlNliMt
A N | > <>l H i l l T H l M I I I U i S
1 |*i
as s o o n a s it h a s b e g u n . I n s u c h e p i s o d e s W e l c h p l a c e s t h e r e a d e r a t a cusp where incidents o f a w a k e n i n g defer, rather t h a n impel, m o m e n t s o f disclosure; travel occurs in t h e gap between r e m e m b e r e d incident a n d its l a t e r e m e r g e n c e as n a r r a t e d m o m e n t . A t m u c h the same time that the y o u n g D e n t o n W e l c h was running a w a y f r o m s c h o o l , J . R . A c k e r l e y ' s classic Hindoo Holiday: An Indian Journal a p p e a r e d — a v e r y f u n n y b o o k t h a t cast a w h i m s i c a l r e t r o s p e c t i v e g l a n c e a t a n e a r l i e r y e a r , 1924, w h e n A c k e r l e y h a d s e r v e d a f i v e m o n t h stint as private secretary t o t h e M a h a r a j a h o f a small H i n d u n a t i v e s t a t e . I n 1924, a l s o , E . M . F o r s t e r ' s l i t e r a r y m o n u m e n t t o t h e l a t e p h a s e o f t h e B r i t i s h R a j , A Passage to India, a p p e a r e d : a n o v e l t h a t m e m o r i a l i z e d a British I n d i a t h a t h a d , i n the v i e w o f m a n y , a l r e a d y dis a p p e a r e d . F o r s t e r ' s n o v e l is e x p l i c i t l y a b o u t t r a v e l , a b o u t a w o m a n v e n t u r i n g u p o n d i f f e r e n t c u l t u r a l t e r r i t o r y t h a t s h e is d e t e r m i n e d t o e m p a t h i z e w i t h a n d u n d e r s t a n d . B u t it is, a b o v e all, i n t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p between t h e E n g l i s h m a n F i e l d i n g a n d t h e M u s l i m A z i z that F o r s t e r addresses his b i g t h e m e o f the testing o f cultural barriers a n d b o u n d aries ( t h e s a m e t h e m e t h a t , l a t e r , w a s t o d o m i n a t e t h e p o s t h u m o u s l y p u b l i s h e d Maurice). A t t h e s a m e t i m e , t h e s m o l d e r i n g i n t e n s i t y o f t h e affection between F i e l d i n g a n d A z i z draws attention t o the centrality o f I n d i a ( a l o n g w i t h E g y p t ) t o F o r s t e r ' s a t t e m p t s t o find h u m a n — i n c l u d i n g s e x u a l — s a t i s f a c t i o n d u r i n g t h e p e r i o d , 1917-25, w h e n h e w a s a w a y f r o m E n g l a n d o n c o l o n i a l s e r v i c e . T h e fictional F i e l d i n g - A z i z r e l a t i o n ship d r a w s u p o n Forster's loyal b u t frustrating a n d u n c o n s u m m a t e d friendship w i t h the I n d i a n M u s l i m S y e d M a s o o d . I n fact, virtually all o f F o r s t e r ' s experiences in the L e v a n t i n e w o r l d a n d in I n d i a w e r e inflected b y s e x u a l p r e s s u r e s . W h e n h e w e n t t o I n d i a f o r a s e c o n d t i m e i n 1921, as private secretary t o the M a h a r a j a h o f D e w a s , t h e latter f o u n d h i m a y o u n g retainer t o satisfy his sexual needs, e v e n t h o u g h he h i m s e l f cus t o m a r i l y d i d his u t m o s t t o e r a d i c a t e s a m e - s e x i n t i m a c i e s a t c o u r t ( F u r b a n k 2:81-86). I t w a s F o r s t e r w h o t h e n g o t A c k e r l e y t h e p o s t o f p r i v a t e s e c r e t a r y a t C h h a t a r p u r ( C h h o k r a p u r i n Hindoo Holiday). Hindoo Holiday is p r e s e n t e d i n t h e f o r m o f a j o u r n a l , o n e s o e l e g a n t l y w r i t t e n a n d s t r u c t u r e d t h a t it b e s p e a k s c a r e f u l r e t r o s p e c t i v e e d i t i n g . I t is e s s e n t i a l l y t h e s t o r y o f A c k e r l e y ' s q u e s t t o k i s s S h a r m a , m o s t beautiful o f t h e M a h a r a j a h ' s y o u n g cup-bearers. T h e text's e r o t i c s a r e set u p e a r l y o n : first, i n c o m m e n t s o n t h e s c u l p t u r e s i n a J a i n temple, w h o s e "indecencies, M a j o r P o m b e y [was] considerate e n o u g h t o m e n t i o n , [ i n c l u d e d ] a l o n g file o f s o l d i e r s m a r c h i n g g a i l y a l o n g , a n d a n o t h e r s m a l l e r , m o r e e l a b o r a t e d e s i g n . . . b o l h s o d o m i l i e " ( 1 7 18); 2 6
I td
I'd I HI IS I -, W I I'M I V IMOA
and second, in a n exchange w i t h the M a h a r a j a h w h o , after asking A c k e r l e y a b o u t a literary reference t o " N e r o m a r r y i n g P y t h a g o r a s in public," receives t h e c o y r e p l y , " W e l l , . . . it m a y m e a n either t h a t N e r o , as a p a t r o n , g a v e P y t h a g o ras in m a r r i a g e t o s o m e y o u n g l a d y , o r t h a t he p u b l i c l y e m b r a c e d Pythagorean philosophy." " B u t , m y g o o d sir," said his H i g h n e s s , "this w a s n o t that P y t h a g o ras; this w a s a n o t h e r P y t h a g o r a s , a b o y . " " O h , " I said hastily. " W e l l , in t h a t case p e r h a p s it m e a n s exactly w h a t it s a y s . " H i s H i g h n e s s simpered i n t o his sleeve. (21) T h i s a r c h e x c h a n g e is a p r e l u d e t o A c k e r l e y ' s a c c o u n t s o f t h e M a h a r a jah's " G o d s ' " entertainments in w h i c h c o m e l y m a l e H i n d u y o u t h s d a n c e f o r t h e c o u r t , e n a c t i n g s t o r i e s f r o m t h e m y t h s . I t is a t o n e o f these c r o s s - d r e s s e d e n t e r t a i n m e n t s t h a t t h e M a h a r a j a h singles o u t t h e barber's s o n S h a r m a f o r his guest's attention. A c k e r l e y ' s desire t o take S l i a r m a f o r h i s v a l e t is i n i t i a l l y f o i l e d , t h o u g h , w h e n h e a l a r m s t h e s h y hoy w i t h a d e m a n d f o r a kiss. A c k e r l e y is e v e n t u a l l y g r a t i f i e d w i t h s o m e d e g r e e o f i n t i m a c y a t court, a t r i a n g u l a t e d succession o f exchanges b e t w e e n A c k e r l e y , S h a r m a , a n d S h a r m a ' s friend, the guest house clerk N a r a y a n , allowing for a measure o f physical contact. T h e E n g l i s h - s p e a k i n g N a r a y a n r e v e a l s t h a t h e h i m s e l f is t h e o b j e c t o f S h a r m a ' s a f f e c t i o n s ; A c k e r l e y , m e a n w h i l e , seems increasingly d r a w n t o b o t h , o n o n e occasion a d m i r i n g N a r a y a n ' s g r a c e f u l n e s s " i n h i s w h i t e m u s l i n c l o t h e s , t h e sleeves o f his l o o s e v e s t w i d e n i n g o u t a t t h e w r i s t , t h e l o n g s t r e a m e r s o f h i s t u r b a n f l o a t i n g b e h i n d h i m " (217). T h e d e s c r i p t i o n c o n t i n u e s i n s i m i l a r v e i n : The b r e e z e p u f f e d at his dhoti as he a p p r o a c h e d , m o u l d i n g t h e soft s t u f f t o t h e shape o f his t h i g h ; t h e n as he t u r n e d a b e n d in the p a t h a n o t h e r gentle gust t o o k the g a r m e n t f r o m b e h i n d a n d blew it aside, m o m e n t a r i l y b a r i n g a slim b r o w n leg. I t o o k his h a n d a n d led h i m into m y tent. (217-18) O n this, t h e a c c o u n t ' s m o s t c h a r g e d o c c a s i o n , N a r a y a n d r a w s t h e l i n g l i s h m a n i n t o t h e s h a d o w o f a tree a n d kisses h i m o n t h e c h e e k ; not a b o u t t o lose a n o p p o r t u n i t y , A c k e r l e y seizes N a r a y a n a n d p l a n t s t w o kisses o n h i s l i p s a m a r k e d t r a n s g r e s s i o n , s i n c e t h e h i g h - c a s t e H i n d u neither eats n o r deigns lo dally w i t h t h o s e w h o e a t m e a t . Shnrmu, t o o , unbends on o n e occasion, holding hands with the amorous liuglishman.
F o r s t e r d e c l i n e d A c k e r l e y ' s i n v i t a t i o n t o w r i t e a p r e f a c e f o r Hin doo Holiday, u n w i l l i n g t o e n d o r s e a b o o k t h a t e x p o s e d t h e s y b a r i t i c M a h a r a j a h ' s s e x u a l tastes a n d p r a c t i c e s . N o n e t h e l e s s , it w a s e n t h u s i a s t i c a l l y r e c e i v e d , b e c o m i n g t h e k i n d o f b o o k t h a t finds its w a y i n t o t h e " t o p t e n " o n t h e lists o f w i d e l y d i f f e r e n t r e a d e r s . G i v e n its c l a r i t y a b o u t t h e s e x u a l p r e f e r e n c e s o f its a u t h o r ( m a l e s ; young m a l e s ; y o u n g Hindu m a l e s ) , this seems surprising. C a n d o r p r e s u m a b l y r e m o v e d the b o o k ' s p o t e n t i a l t h r e a t t o its e a r l i e r E n g l i s h r e a d e r s . T h e M a h a r a j a h , d e s c r i b e d c o n d e s c e n d i n g l y , is little m o r e t h a n a figure o f f u n ; t h e H i n d u G a n y m e d e figures a r e f e m i n i z e d a n d a e s t h e t i c i z e d ; a n d t h e a u t h o r d o e s h i s b e s t t o p r e s e n t h i m s e l f as a h a r m l e s s e c c e n t r i c , unthreateningly attracted t o characters w h o turn o u t t o b e n o m o r e t h a n m i l d l y e x o t i c t h u m b n a i l sketches. B a s k i n g i n his E n g l i s h privilege, A c k e r l e y s u g g e s t s t h a t his j o b as p r i v a t e s e c r e t a r y t o t h e M a h a r a j a h w a s j u s t a n i n t e r l u d e , a trifle; n o t h i n g w a s a t s t a k e f o r I n d i a , f o r h i m , or for the E m p i r e . B u t F o r s t e r ' s refusal t o indulge a friend b y writing a p r e f a c e s u g g e s t s t h a t h e , a t least, t h o u g h t d i f f e r e n t l y . 27
T h e travels o f the A u d e n - I s h e r w o o d - S p e n d e r g r o u p t o G e r m a n y , e s p e c i a l l y B e r l i n , b e t w e e n 1928 a n d 1933 r e p r e s e n t e d a m o r e d e t e r m i n e d b i d t o enlist t r a v e l a s e s c a p e t o w a r d g r e a t e r e x p e r i e n t i a l f r e e d o m , while linking in a m o r e c o m p l e x fashion w i t h E n g l i s h ideologies o f the period. G r o w i n g familiarity w i t h the w o r k o f F r e u d e n h a n c e d the resistance t o repression that constellated a r o u n d D . H . L a w r e n c e ' s n o t o r i o u s fictions, j o i n i n g w i t h t h e i n i t i a t i v e s o f y o u n g O x b r i d g e g r a d uates t o get a w a y f r o m their genteel upper-middle-class families. B e r l i n w a s a s t r o n g m a g n e t , a n d it w a s r e l a t i v e l y a c c e s s i b l e . A s S t e p h e n S p e n d e r p u t it i n his i n t r o d u c t i o n t o The Temple, F o r m a n y o f m y friends a n d f o r myself, G e r m a n y seemed a paradise w h e r e there w a s n o censorship a n d y o u n g G e r m a n s e n j o y e d e x t r a o r d i n a r y f r e e d o m in their lives. B y contrast E n g l a n d was a c o u n t r y w h e r e J a m e s J o y c e ' s Ulysses was b a n n e d , as was also R a d c l y f f e H a l l ' s The Well of Loneliness—a n o v e l a b o u t a lesbian relationship. E n g l a n d w a s w h e r e the police, at the o r d e r o f M r M e a d , a L o n d o n magistrate, t o o k d o w n f r o m the walls o f the W a r r e n G a l l e r y pictures f r o m a n e x h i b i t i o n o f D . H . L a w r e n c e ' s paintings, ( x ) S h o r t l y a f t e r a r r i v i n g t h e r e , W . H . A u d e n p r o c l a i m e d B e r l i n as " t h e b u g g e r ' s d a y d r e a m . T h e r e a r e 170 m a l e b r o t h e l s u n d e r p o l i c e c o n t r o l . I c o u l d say a l o t a b o u t m y b o y , a cross b e t w e e n a rugger hearty a n d J o s e p h i n e B a k e r " ( q t d . in C a r p e n t e r 90). A u d e n , C h r i s t o p h e r I s h c r w o o d , a n d S p e n d e r all n e g o t i a t e d ( h e i r w a y a r o u n d G e r m a n y i n t h e 118
T O U K I N T N W I T H TYf>|(WUITIi',lt
late W e i m a r period, characteristically moving from bourgeois host families into the resources their own English-contemporary circles a Horded, and from there either into the G e r m a n intellectual/profes sional set or into a sort o f underworld populated by "adolescent boys who hung about many o f the Berlin bars and cafes, and were willing to have sex with English visitors in return for presents and m o n e y " (90). In the earlier part o f the period, the English affectionately ex changed news about their antibourgeois sexual experiments against a background of heady conversation about sex, class, and politics. Y o u n g G e r m a n males brought out in them a sort o f boastful hedo nism, evoking an interesting vacillation as the rugged Berlin hustler competed for favors with the noble blond Teuton. Both types, far from the delicate Oriental favored by Forster and Ackerley, shared the advantage o f seeming to m o v e around publicly, offering their privi leged English clients a way out o f the genteel closet. Unsurprisingly, the homosexuality o f the English circle in preNazi G e r m a n y does not declare itself openly in their writings from the period but is displaced, in A u d e n ' s case, onto enigmatic Freudian lyrics and, in Isherwood's, onto the iconic evocation that eventually emerged as Goodbye to Berlin in 1939, more than half a decade after Nazi successes had made it impossible to view G e r m a n y as a healthy homosexual haven. Spender's major contribution to the literature came only with the (somewhat embarrassed) publication of The Tem ple in 1988. T h e rapid collapse of W e i m a r G e r m a n y brought the h o m o sexuality o f reasonably affluent, well-educated, "liberated" English youths up against G e r m a n Fascism, rendering their admiration for blond nobility and tough physicality extremely fraught. Goodbye to Berlin refracts Isherwood's homosexuality through the febrile atmosphere o f Berlin between 1930 and 1933, giving it unstable definition. The first-person narrator is an observer, a shadowy figure providing sharply realized portraits o f others in a relationship with himself that remains equally elusive. A m o n g these is the legendary Sally Bowles, but the male figures are also piquant and suggestive. The depressed Peter has escaped from his father and family home, passing through the hands o f several psychiatrists before imagining that he can finally settle d o w n with the blond y o u n g G e r m a n Otto. Then there is < )llo himself, "squatting . . . on the b e d , . . . so animally alive, his naked brown body so sleek with health" (118), his youthful vigor and work ing-class vulgarity as seductive to the narrator as it is to the unfortu nate P e t e r . A n d then there are the street boys, w h o hang out at the l;ll< A N I > O T I I I ' . U T t U H J I H i s
139
A l e x a n d e r C a s i n o " w h i l e their girls w e r e o u t w o r k i n g t h e F r i e d r i c h s t r a s s e a n d t h e L i n d e n f o r p o s s i b l e p i c k u p s " (123), a n d w h o i n d e x I s h e r w o o d ' s a n d A u d e n ' s p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n casual same-sex liaisons i n Berlin. T h e m o s t i n t r i g u i n g p o r t r a i t , p e r h a p s , is t h a t o f B e r n h a r d L a n d a u e r , w h o , i n r e c o u n t i n g his h i s t o r y t o t h e n a r r a t o r , d e s c r i b e s h i m s e l f as h a v i n g b e e n " a q u e e r s o r t o f b o y . " S o n o f a w e a l t h y J e w i s h d e p a r t m e n t store o w n e r , B e r n h a r d invites t h e n a r r a t o r t o his a p a r t m e n t a n d , later, t o h i s lakeside villa. T h e n a r r a t o r registers h i s h o s t ' s b i d f o r attention (he answers t h e d o o r " w e a r i n g a beautifully e m b r o i d e r e d k i m o n o " [ 1 5 6 ] ) a n d gestures o f i n t i m a c y (the h a n d o n the shoulder), p r e s e n t i n g h i m as f a s t i d i o u s , o v e r l y i r o n i c , a n d e v i d e n t l y p l e a d i n g f o r friendship. W h i l e B e r n h a r d ostensibly distinguishes himself f r o m the n a r r a t o r i n t h e w o r d s h e uses t o express h i s o w n a l i e n a t i o n , these w o r d s tacitly suggest a deeper c o n n e c t i o n b e t w e e n the t w o m e n : R e m e m b e r t h a t 1 a m a c r o s s - b r e e d . P e r h a p s , a f t e r a l l , t h e r e is o n e d r o p o f pure Russian b l o o d in m y polluted veins. . . . Y o u , Christo pher, with y o u r centuries o f A n g l o - S a x o n freedom behind y o u , with y o u r M a g n a C a r t a e n g r a v e d u p o n y o u r heart,
cannot
understand
t h a t w e p o o r B a r b a r i a n s n e e d t h e stiffness o f a u n i f o r m t o k e e p u s s t a n d i n g u p r i g h t . (161-62)
S t i f f u n i f o r m s , o f c o u r s e , will n o t suffice l o n g t o k e e p B e r n h a r d u p r i g h t ; e q u a l l y , M a g n a C a r t a is n o t t h e g u a r a n t e e o f a b s o l u t e f r e e d o m f o r C h r i s t o p h e r that B e r n h a r d thinks it t o be. T h e b r u t a l N a z i a s s a u l t s o n t h e streets o f B e r l i n , e s c a l a t i n g t h r o u g h t h e 1930s, e v e n t u ally force the visitor t o c o n f r o n t a c o n t r a d i c t i o n b e t w e e n y o u t h f u l , b l o n d m a l e b e a u t y a n d N a z i i d e o l o g y , as w e l l as a p a r a l l e l b e t w e e n t h e marginality o f Jews and homosexuals. T h e m o m e n t o f disengagement c o m e s d u r i n g C h r i s t o p h e r ' s visit t o a m e e t i n g o f pathfinders w h e r e , t o his d i s c o m f o r t , h e d e c o d e s a N a z i i c o n : A b o v e the table with the candlesticks w a sa sort o f icon—the framed d r a w i n g o f a y o u n g pathfinder o f unearthly beauty, gazing steadily i n t o t h e f a r d i s t a n c e , a b a n n e r i n h i s h a n d . The whole place made
feel profoundly
uncomfortable.
me
(198; e m p h a s i s a d d e d )
S t e p h e n S p e n d e r ' s The Temple r e q u i r e d a f a r g r e a t e r t i m e - l a p s e between experience, writing, a n d publication t h a n the w o r k o f A u d e n a n d I s h e r w o o d . The Temple is a n a l l e g o r i c a l r o n i a n a c l e f i n w h i c h S p e n d e r h i m s e l f f i g u r e s as n a r r a t o r P a u l , A u d e n us S i m o n W i l m o t , a n d I s h e r w o o d as W i l l i a m B r a d s h n w / " The Teni/ilc is m o t i v a t e d b y P a u l ' s l.|o
l'" 11 M U X I •. " I I I I I I I ' I ' W I ' I I I I'
infatuation with fellow undergraduate M a r s t o n , a n idealizing h o m o sexual attraction that misfires, a n d that leads h i m t o accept the invitalion o f E r n e s t S t o c k m a n n . a visiting student at O x f o r d ( a n d a figure w h o recalls B e r n h a r d L a n d a u e r i n Goodbye to Berlin), t o j o i n h i m i n H a m b u r g . I n t h e first p h a s e o f t h e n o v e l , G e r m a n y signifies b e a u t i f u l — a n d beautifully p h o t o g r a p h e d m a l e bodies, carefree, generous c o m panionship, and the trappings o f m o d e r n i t y : " P a u l watched the y o u n g G e r m a n s . T h e y h a d a s t y l e w h i c h h e t h o u g h t o f as e x c i t i n g l y ' m o d e r n . ' T h e fashions they w o r e were sun a n d air a n d their b r o n z e skin. T h e b o y s g e n t l e a n d s o f t , t h e g i r l s s c u l p t u r a l , finely m o u l d e d " (42). P a u l ' s visit t o G e r m a n y , t h e n , seems like a d i s c o v e r y o f the b o d y — p a r t i c u larly the y o u n g m a l e b o d y — a n d the potential f o r a quality a n d inten sity o f c o m p a n i o n s h i p , s e x , a n d l o v e . T h i s s y n e c d o c h i c b o d y c o n s o l i dates itself aesthetically i n p h o t o g r a p h i c images, like t h e o n e that provides the novel's central e m b l e m : It w a s o f a b a t h e r s t a n d i n g n a k e d a t t h e r e e d - f r i n g e d e d g e o f a l a k e . The
picture w a s taken slightly from b e l o w so that the torso,
rising
a b o v e the thighs, receded, a n d the w h o l e b o d y w a s seen, layer layer o f hips a n d rib-cage and shoulders, up to the t o w e r i n g
on
head,
with dark hair helmeted against a dark sky. V - s h a p e d s h a d o w s o f wil low
l e a v e s fell l i k e s h o w e r s
of arrows
on
San
Sebastian,
on
y o u t h ' s sunlit breast and thighs. " O h , wonderful!" said Paul, temple o f the body!"
the "The
(69)
I . a t e r , P a u l tries t o r e p l i c a t e t h i s p h o t o g r a p h w i t h o n e t h a t s t a g e s h i s f r i e n d L o t h a r as t h e S e b a s t i a n figure. A n o t h e r s c e n a r i o , i n t h e n o v e l t h a t W i l l i a m is w o r k i n g o n w h e n P a u l visits h i m p r i o r t o l e a v i n g f o r H a m b u r g , i n v o l v e s the " i m a g e o f a ( l e r m a n b o y w h o m [ M r . S] has t o seek o u t i n the l o w e s t bars a n d dives of B e r l i n . . . . T h e r e a r e s o m e p e o p l e w h o , t o b e r e d e e m e d , h a v e t o g o into the lowest kennels o f the gutter—like Ibsen's W i l d D u c k diving t o I h e b o t t o m o f t h e p o n d a m o n g t h e m u d a n d w e e d s " (21). T h e s e " l o w csl k e n n e l s , " i n The Temple, i n c l u d e n o t o n l y t h e w a t e r f r o n t s t r e e t - a n d b a r life o f H a m b u r g , b u t a l s o c h a r a c t e r s w h o e x p l o i t t h e i r m o n e y e d linglish p a t r o n s , w h o b e c o m e N a z i s , a n d w h o fail t o realize the d r e a m of u n r e p r e s s e d c o m r a d e s h i p a n d s e x u a l i t y . I n f a c t , t h e n o v e l , i n t h e l o r m in w h i c h it w a s f i n a l l y p u b l i s h e d , s e e m s t o g o b e y o n d s i g n a l i n g i t s a u t h o r ' s critique o f a n earlier E n g l i s h h o m o s e x u a l i d e o l o g y . M a r k i n g a break f r o m the a n d r o g y n i z e d a n d f e m i n i z e d figures o f the c o l o n i a l R a j , the iilctilizcd m a s c u l i n i t y a n d heroic physieality o f N a z i G e r m a n y I
II'.MI
»l
.11
\ HI 1
< I I
I I I It T R O I I I I I I N
I ,|l
p u t h o m o s e x u a l i t y i n t o a different k i n d o f closet, proleptic o f later urban gay b a r scenes.
29
S p e n d e r ' s r e w r i t i n g o f t h e n o v e l h e h a d first
c o m p o s e d s e v e r a l d e c a d e s b e f o r e e v i d e n t l y enlists t h e p i c a r e s q u e h e d o n i s m o f t h e E n g l i s h B e r l i n c i r c l e t o p r o d u c e a n a l l e g o r y o f t h e rise o f fascism. S u c h m o r a l strictures are scarcely e v i d e n t in the w o r k o f A l d o Busi, a practitioner o f the Italian n e w novel w h o exploits the travel narrative's ability to scandalize. O n e o f Busi's m o r e cryptic observa t i o n s is t h a t " [ a ] h e t e r o s e x u a l d o e s n o t t r a v e l — h e m o v e s f o r w a r d " (102). W h a t d i s t i n c t i o n is B u s i s u g g e s t i n g h e r e ? P e r h a p s it is t h e d i s t i n c t i o n b e t w e e n e x p e r i e n c i n g a p l a c e as other a n d
queer—"travel
i n g " — a n d e x p e r i e n c i n g it as a v a r i a t i o n o f t h e same—and
thus " m o v
ing f o r w a r d . "
3 0
C o m p a r i s o n o f Busi with P a u l Bowles, celebrated
d o y e n o f t h e T a n g i e r circle o f e x p a t r i a t e s a n d visitors, establishes this d i f f e r e n c e m o r e c l e a r l y . I n t e r v i e w i n g B o w l e s f o r Rolling Stone i n
1974,
M i c h a e l R o g e r s suggested that M o r o c c o was "really a v e r y bisexual c u l t u r e " ( C a p o n i 6 9 ) — t o w h i c h B o w l e s a s s e n t e d , m o r e o r less. R o g e r s thus neatly eliminated the need to deal w i t h M o r o c c a n sexual codes a n d p r a c t i c e s as d i f f e r e n t a n d c u l t u r a l l y
specific, a s s i m i l a t i n g
them
i n s t e a d , as h e a n d o t h e r s h a v e a s s i m i l a t e d A r a b d r u g u s e , t o a " l i b e r a t o r y " A m e r i c a n c o u n t e r c u l t u r e . S u c h elisions p r e s u m a b l y facilitate the m o v i n g f o r w a r d — a n d m o v i n g o n — o f Busi's " n o r m a l " (hetero s e x u a l ) t r a v e l e r . B u t i f t h e q u e e r s u b j e c t is a t t h e c e n t e r o f B u s i ' s fictionalized
travels, w h a t constitutes that traveling? D o e s the queer
subject articulate
particular and differentiated
w a y s o f acting
and
reacting in the situations o f travel? D o e s he engage differently w i t h the p l a c e s h e visits? A n d t o w h a t d e g r e e c a n h e c l a i m t o s i t u a t e a u t h o r i t a t i v e l y — t o k n o w — t h e other culture? S o m e reflection o n P a u l B o w l e s a n d W i l l i a m B u r r o u g h s , a l o n g w i t h B u s i , will b r i n g these q u e s t i o n s into clearer focus. P a u l B o w l e s has m a d e M o r o c c o — m o r e specifically, h o m e s i n c e 1947.
Tangier—his
U n l i k e B u s i , B o w l e s has n e v e r p u b l i c l y defined his
sexuality; a n d in the M o r o c c o t h a t emerges f r o m his writings, h o m o s e x u a l i t y is a b o v e a l l a n a t m o s p h e r e : d i f f u s e d l a r g e l y t h r o u g h l e g e n d , passing increasingly
into
m y t h . T h e literary
h o m o s e x u a l i t y o n l y b y n u a n c e , is h i s n o v e l The filmed
foundation, Sheltering
Sky
evoking (1949),
b y B e r n a r d o B e r t o l u c c i s o m e d e c a d e s later u n d e r the s a m e title.
B o t h n o v e l a n d film l o o s e l y a s s o c i a t e d t r a v e l in N o r t h A f r i c a w i t h f r a u g h t m a r r i a g e , a l o v e t r i a n g l e , a n d v i o l e n c e : all o f w h i c h , in c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h t h e h a l l u c i n a t o r y d e s e r t s e l l i n g , m e d i a t e d a. g e n e r a l i z e d I,I J
In 11 it I M S W i l l i 1 »
>> I'll I MN
image o f existential extremity, particularly for A m e r i c a n readers. S u b sequently, B o w l e s w a s t o d r a w e n o u g h literary a n d p o p - c u l t u r a l figures t o T a n g i e r — a m o n g t h e m J a c k K e r o u a c , A l l e n G i n s b e r g w i t h his l o v e r Peter O r l o v s k y , T r u m a n C a p o t e , W i l l i a m B u r r o u g h s , Tennessee W i l l i a m s , B y r o n G y s i n , a n d G r e g o r y C o r s o — t o suggest the A m e r i c a n experience o f a cult p h e n o m e n o n . Bowles's wife J a n e , herself a lesbian writer, w a s v i v i d l y present, i f n o t precisely a t h e r h u s b a n d ' s side. T o b e p a r t o f c u l t life w a s t o i n d u l g e b o h e m i a n , s o m e t i m e s e x p e n s i v e , tastes for chic parties, d r u g s , spectacles, sorcery, a n d a freewheeling a p p r o a c h t o f r i e n d s h i p a n d s e x u a l i t y . M i c h e l l e G r e e n ' s The Dream at the End of the World (1991), i t s e l f a b r e a t h l e s s s y n t h e s i s , i n d e x e s g o s s i p as a n o t h e r k e y i n g r e d i e n t o f c u l t life. I n e f f e c t , t h e c o m b i n a t i o n o f t h e s e elements a n d their transmission t h r o u g h a variety o f m e d i a has given M o r o c c o a c u l t u r a l m y s t i q u e — a domesticated m y s t i q u e — t h a t m i g h t w e l l p r e e m p t t r a v e l i n B u s i ' s sense. B u t Bowles's authority as traveler-interpreter o f M o r o c c a n ( h o m o ) s e x u a l i t y derives f r o m m o r e t h a n the m i x o f chronicle, reminis cence, a n d gossip that m a k e u p G r e e n ' s b o o k . A r o u n d the time he w a s c o m p l e t i n g w o r k o n his n o v e l Up Above the World, i n 1963, B o w l e s i n i tiated a project that has s p a n n e d several decades. H e b e g a n t a p i n g Driss b e n H a m e d Charhardi's ( L a r b i L a y a c h i ' s ) autobiographical episodes, delivered i n M o g h r e b i ; the edited result w a s the translated " n o v e l , " A Life Full of Holes, p u b l i s h e d b y G r o v e P r e s s i n 1964. According t o J a y M c l n e r n y , Bowles had "virtually invented] a new g e n r e " ( C a p o n i 192). M o h a m m e d M r a b e t ' s s i m i l a r l y p r o d u c e d Love with a Few Hairs f o l l o w e d i n 1967, a n d M o h a m m e d C h o u k r i ' s m o r e e l a b o r a t e For Bread Alone i n 1973. O f fifteen g e n e t i c a l l y s i m i l a r b o o k s , C h o u k r i c o n t r i b u t e d t h r e e , i n c l u d i n g Jean Genet in Tangier (1974) a n d Tennessee Williams in Tangier (1979), b u t M o h a m m e d M r a b e t ' s titles constitute the b u l k o f the project. N e w Y o r k ' s I n a n o u t Press p u b l i s h e d t h e latest B o w l e s - M r a b e t c o l l a b o r a t i o n , Chocolate Creams and Dol lars, as r e c e n t l y as 1992 i n a n e x p e n s i v e a r t e d i t i o n , g a r n i s h e d w i t h p h o lographic illustrations b y Philip Taaffe. T h e project has u n d o u b t e d l y succeeded in c o m m o d i f y i n g the c u l t u r a l m y s t i q u e o f M o r o c c o f o r p o s t B e a t N o r t h A m e r i c a a n d , t o a lesser e x t e n t , B r i t a i n . T h e t r a n s l a t i o n theorist R i c h a r d J a c q u e m o n d h a s described a process that seems appropriate to Bowles's work:
In t r a n s l a t i o n une, the
f r o m ti d o m i n a t e d
translator appears
Iniijuiage-eullurc inlo a h e g e m o n i c
as the a u t h o r i t a t i v e
1 I I M I It It \ M 1 u I I I I I!
1 i n .11 I I I 1 ,
mediator
I |\
through
w h o m t h e d o m i n a t e d l a n g u a g e - c u l t u r e is m a i n t a i n e d o u t s i d e t h e l i m i t s o f t h e s e l f a n d a t t h e s a m e t i m e a d a p t e d t o t h i s s e l f i n o r d e r f o r it to be able to c o n s u m e the d o m i n a t e d linguistic-cultural object. (Qtd. in V e n u t i 155)
J a c q u e m o n d ' s c o m m e n t , h o w e v e r , suggests that g a y travelers—like h e t e r o s e x u a l o n e s — c a n p r o d u c e alibis t h r o u g h c u l t u r a l a p p r o p r i a t i o n f o r their o w n m o t i v a t i o n s a n d performances. Characteristically, the chronicles o f Bowles's " n e w genre" are nar ratives o f native i m p r o v e m e n t a n d a d v a n c e m e n t . T h e i r m a i n charac t e r s , v e r s i o n s o f t h e i r T a n g i e r a u t h o r s , b e g i n as s t r e e t - s m a r t v i c t i m s o f class p o v e r t y a n d p a r e n t a l a b u s e . I l l i t e r a t e b u t r e s o u r c e f u l , t h e y a l l y t h e m s e l v e s w i t h f e l l o w M o r o c c a n s w h o s c a v e n g e , steal, a n d , a t t h e h i g h e n d . r u n small cafes. T h e y m e e t u p w i t h a n d b e f r i e n d A m e r i c a n a n d E n g l i s h visitors w h o , in return f o r sexual f a v o r s , s u p p o r t t h e m . M r a b e t ' s m a l e h e r o i n Love with a Few Hairs m a n a g e s a d o u b l e s u c cess, p a r l a y i n g t h e e c o n o m i c r e s o u r c e s a f f o r d e d b y h i s i n t i m a c y w i t h a n E n g l i s h p a t r o n i n t o o w n e r s h i p o f a f i s h i n g fleet a n d a p a r a l l e l c a r e e r as a s u c c e s s f u l f i s h e r m a n a n d w h o l e s a l e r . H e w e d s a M u s l i m w o m a n a n d has children, while r e m a i n i n g loyal t o his p a t r o n , continuing t o p e r f o r m services f o r h i m a n d t o receive his d u e r e w a r d . R e c u r r i n g patterns in several o f these narratives indicate h o w B o w l e s , a l o n g w i t h o t h e r E u r o - A m e r i c a n expatriates a n d visitors, suc ceeded in constructing a mythicized " M o r o c c a n " culture. T h e (native) p r o t a g o n i s t generally searches f o r a n d marries a M u s l i m w i f e , w h o r e m a i n s largely invisible; his o t h e r (hetero)sexual e n c o u n t e r s inject r o m a n t i c fantasy into a misogynistic stance; he entertains sexual activ ity w i t h o t h e r m e n , m o s t l y w h i t e p a t r o n s , b u t o n l y w h e n such activity n e e d n o t b e c o n s t r u e d a s h o m o s e x u a l — t h a t is, w h e n t h e p a r t n e r is a n o l d e r E u r o p e a n a n d t h e h e r o is n o t a t r i s k o f b e i n g f e m i n i z e d ; t h e r e is m u c h k i f c o n s u m p t i o n ; M u s l i m identification
is r e t a i n e d
through
p i e t y , a b s t i n e n c e f r o m a l c o h o l , a n d p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n d a n c e c u l t s s u c h as jilala; a n d t h e r e is a c o n s t a n t t h r e a t o f s o r c e r y , u s u a l l y i n v o l v i n g p o i son
(tsoukil),
following
the betrayal o f sexual/marital
contracts.
N a t i v e M o r o c c a n c u l t u r e , t h e n , is I s l a m i c , s o d o m i t i c a l , d r u g f r i e n d l y , s o r c e r o u s , a n d ecstatic. F o r t h e t r a v e l e r - e x p a t r i a t e circle, it offers a n e x p a n s i v e field f o r l i c e n s e d , i f t r i c k y , p l a y . E u r o p e a n a n d native encounter each other in t h e shiftingly a s y m metrical p a t r o n - p r o t e g e contract. M r a b e t ' s m o s t explicit a c c o u n t o f this e n c o u n t e r a p p e a r s in t h e a u t o b i o g r a p h i c a l
Look and Move
On
(1989). M r a b e t r e c o u n t s h o w h e lirsl niel t w o v i s i t o r s , R e e v e s a n d i-M
101 'IMS 1 s w i 1 n rvi-i'WKi 1 n o l
M a r i a , o n a c a f e t e r r a c e . H e tells t h e m t h a t h e is " g l a d t o h a v e m e t s o m e A m e r i c a n s " ( 1 3 ) , s u b s e q u e n t l y visits t h e m at their h o t e l , a n d travels w i t h t h e m to M a r r a k e s h . H e u n d e r s t a n d s v e r y well their inter est i n h i m : I said t o myself: B o t h o f these p e o p l e are vicious. T h e y b o t h w a n t to sleep w i t h m e . A n d w i t h all the k i f a n d w h i s k e y I h a d in m y h e a d , M a r i a l o o k e d v e r y b e a u t i f u l to m e , a n d R e e v e s l o o k e d v e r y h a n d s o m e , a n d I felt like m a k i n g l o v e to b o t h o f t h e m . (14) H i s attentions later lead to his a c c o m p a n y i n g M a r i a o n h e r r e t u r n t o N e w Y o r k . F r o m t h e r e M a r i a , d i s c o v e r i n g s h e c a n n o t c o n t r o l his q u e s t for experience, p a c k s h i m o f f t o R e e v e s ' s f a m i l y in I o w a , w h e r e he p r o ceeds t o o f f e n d R e e v e s ' s a b s t i n e n t m i d d l e - A m e r i c a n p a r e n t s a n d t o e m b a r r a s s R e e v e s h i m s e l f , w i t h his d e f i a n t p u r s u i t o f a l c o h o l a n d s e x . F o r g o o d m e a s u r e , h e i n f o r m s R e e v e s ' s m o t h e r , " I l o v e t o s t a y u p all n i g h t a n d l o o k f o r g i r l s t o sleep w i t h " (52), a d d i n g , p r o v o c a t i v e l y , " W h a t d i d h e h a v e o n his m i n d , y o u r s o n , w h e n h e a s k e d m e t o c o m e h e r e ? " (55). S o h e is d i s p a t c h e d t o N e w Y o r k a n d f r o m t h e r e b a c k t o T a n g i e r , s h a k i n g t h e A m e r i c a n d u s t o f f his feet. T h e R e e v e s e s h a v e financed M r a b e t , p r o v i d i n g h i m w i t h resources a n d opportunities o t h erwise u n a v a i l a b l e to the M o r o c c a n d e p e n d e n t ; he, in t u r n , has offered sexual services t h a t seem t o j u s t i f y s o m e t h i n g m o r e t h a n d e p e n d e n t m a i n t e n a n c e — b u t o n his o w n t e r m s . T h e r e w i l l a l w a y s b e o t h e r p a t r o n s . M r a b e t ' s ( o r is it B o w l e s ' s ? ) s k i l l c o n s i s t s i n t h e d i s c r e t i o n w i t h w h i c h he negotiates the r a w e r edges o f such a r r a n g e m e n t s . B u t M r a b e t , all t h e s a m e , d o e s n o t r e p e a t t h e l i m i t c a s e t h a t t h e R e e v e s e s represent. Look and Move On i n v i t e s t h e r e a d e r t o s i t u a t e M r a b e t ' s v a r i o u s n a r r a t i v e s o f p a t r o n a g e w i t h i n t h e w i d e r f r a m e w o r k o f his r e l a t i o n s h i p w i t h B o w l e s ; t h e e p i s o d e i n v o l v i n g R e e v e s sets u p f o r a n a c c o u n t o f M r a b e t ' s m e e t i n g w i t h P a u l a n d J a n e B o w l e s o n the b e a c h at M e r k a l a , after w h i c h p o i n t t h e a u t o b i o g r a p h y d e v o t e s e q u a l a t t e n t i o n t o life at I he Bowleses a n d to M r a b e t ' s courtship o f a n d eventual m a r r i a g e to Z o h r a . M r a b e t recounts h o w J a n e B o w l e s hailed h i m o n the b e a c h — " Y o u s m o k e a lot o f k i f f o r s o m e o n e so y o u n g " — a f t e r he h a d a l r e a d y i d e n t i f i e d t h e c o u p l e , P a u l w a l k i n g in t h e c o m p a n y o f " a t a l l A m e r i c a n I h c y call B l H o m b r e I n v i s i b l e [ W i l l i a m B u r r o u g h s ] " (90). A n d it w a s llms that M r a b e t a c q u i r e d , not o n l y a n o t h e r p a t r o n , b u t i n c o r p o r a t i o n i n t o a n i n s i d e r g r o u p w h o s e p r e s t i g e lie h a s d o n e his p a r t t o p r o m o t e . 3 1
T h e M o r o c c o translation project c o m p l i c a t e s (he sexual c o n t r a c t i . l ' N I M t H AND <> I 111' 14 I'ltul'iii r\
|,p,
b y situating it w i t h i n a c o l o n i a l c o n t e x t i n w h i c h s e x u a l acts m e d i a t e shifting p o w e r gestures a n d relations. T y p i c a l l y , the native protege will a s s u m e o n l y the d o m i n a n t role i n the s o d o m i t i c a l act. H e will also b e q u i c k t o characterize t h e acts o f s o d o m y h e witnesses in terms o f p o w e r , especially colonial p o w e r . T h e E u r o p e a n s o d o m i t e , f o r t h e native c o m m u n i t y , displays the n o r m a t i v e decadence o f t h e West; M r a b e t consistently " o t h e r s " t h e g r o u p h e likes t o call " t h e N a z a r e n e s , " dissociating h i m s e l f f r o m their values. I n t h e strongest m o m e n t o f resistance, his rejection o f W e s t e r n decadence explicitly l i n k s s e x u a l / s a d i s t i c p e r f o r m a n c e w i t h c o l o n i a l d o m i n a t i o n . I n Look and Move On, h e a c c o m p a n i e s a f r i e n d t o a T a n g i e r p a r t y a t w h i c h t h e E n g l i s h h o s t , A l b e r t , p r e s i d e s w i t h a w h i p , l a s h i n g t w o S p a n i s h b o y s as t h e y lie f a c e d o w n o n a r u g . T h e n , a t A l b e r t ' s b e h e s t , a l a r g e b l a c k m a n publicly s o d o m i z e s t w o other S p a n i s h b o y s w h o are lying o n the same r u g . A s a " m a n w h o h a t e s E u r o p e a n s " (17), M r a b e t r e p o r t s h i s c o m m e n t s t o t h e b l a c k m a n w h o is " w o r k f i n g ] o n " o n e o f t h e b o y s : Happy
with
any American
or Jew
or Englishman,
or
any
F r e n c h m a n , yes? T h e y c o m e here and y o u s h o w t h e m your
filthy
backside
a n d e v e r y t h i n g else y o u ' v e g o t . A n d they t a k e pictures o f y o u d o i n g y o u r w o r k , a n d s e l l t h e m l a t e r i n E u r o p e . A n d y o u l i k e t h a t . (19)
M r a b e t t e m p o r a r i l y enters into the colonial contract, o n l y t o e x p o s e a n d r e p u d i a t e it. I n s e d u c i n g M a r i a a n d s o d o m i z i n g R e e v e s , b e f o r e e v e n t u a l l y s p u r n i n g b o t h , M r a b e t uses t h e i r c u l t u r a l a s s u m p t i o n s a n d fantasies in o r d e r t o dissolve the contract. S e d u c i n g a n d being seduced ( a t least figuratively) b y M r a b e t , B o w l e s a s s u m e s t h e a u t h o r i t y o f p r e senter a n d m e d i a t o r , s t a n d i n g outside o f t h e e n g a g e m e n t s b e t w e e n W e s t e r n visitors a n d M o r o c c a n natives, a n d c o n t a i n i n g t h e m w i t h i n t h e l i t e r a r y f r a m e ( t h e " n e w g e n r e " ) h e i n v e n t s . T h e m a t e r i a l , w h i l e it e m b o d i e s s o m e sort o f critique o f the colonial/sexual contract, remains a t t h e s a m e t i m e d e p e n d e n t o n a n d c o m p l i c i t o u s w i t h it. B y this time, t h e T a n g i e r experience h a d a l r e a d y a s s u m e d m o r e g e n e r a l i z e d f o r m i n t h e c u l t classic Naked Lunch (1959) b y " E l H o m b r e I n v i s i b l e " h i m s e l f , W i l l i a m B u r r o u g h s . Naked Lunch, o f f e r i n g a n e x o t i c i z e d , f a n t a s i z e d p a r a d i g m o f e n c o u n t e r b e t w e e n t h e s t a t e a n d its d r o p o u t s , stands o n the threshold o f p o s t m o d e r n i s m . L i v i n g in T a n g ier c o n t i n u o u s l y f o r a b o u t f o u r y e a r s , B u r r o u g h s p l a y e d a c o m p r e h e n sive r o l e as p a r t o f t h e B o w l e s c i r c l e ; in Naked Lunch, h o w e v e r , h e d i s tances h i m s e l f f r o m t h e city m o r e decisively t h a n B o w l e s h a d d o n e . T a n g i e r , in f a c t , d o e s n o l i t s e l f a p p e a r , b u t b e c o m e s i c o n i c a s I n t e r -
h|fi
r o i < HIS i s W i l l i I ' V l ' i ' W H I 1 if MM
z o n e : a t r a v e l site t h a t d r a w s o n , m a g n i f i e s , a n d t r a n s f i g u r e s s e x , d r u g , a n d p o w e r t h e m e s a l r e a d y p r e s e n t i n B o w l e s ' s w o r k . I n t e r z o n e is a l i m inal, surreal territory w h e r e regimes o f law e n f o r c e m e n t a n d m e d i c i n e jointly control a total culture o f transgression, including heroin c o n sumption, s o d o m y , and coprophagy. Burroughs's A r a b boys charac teristically disport themselves in a sexual athleticism c h a r g e d w i t h v i o lence: A l i seize h i m b y o n e ankle, t u g the a n k l e u n d e r the a r m pit, l o c k his a r m a r o u n d the calf. T h e b o y k i c k d e s p e r a t e l y
at A l i ' s face.
Other
a n k l e p i n i o n e d . A l i tilt t h e b o y b a c k o n his s h o u l d e r s . T h e b o y ' s c o c k e x t e n d s a l o n g h i s s t o m a c h , f l o a t free p u l s i n g . A l i p u t his h a n d s o v e r his h e a d . Spit o n his c o c k . T h e o t h e r sighs d e e p l y as A l i slide his c o c k in. T h e m o u t h s g r i n d t o g e t h e r s m e a r i n g b l o o d . S h a r p m u s t y o d o r o f penetrated rectum.
Nimun
d r i v e in l i k e a w e d g e , f o r c e j i s m o u t
the
o t h e r c o c k in l o n g h o t s p u r t s . ( T h e a u t h o r h a s o b s e r v e d t h a t A r a b c o c k s tend to be w i d e and w e d g e shaped.)
(ji)
Passages such as this s t r i p p e d - d o w n , o b s e r v a t i o n a l n a r r a t i v e — w h i c h a l s o o c c u r i n B u s i ' s Sodomies in Elevenpoint—are intercut w i t h scenar ios i n a v e r y d i f f e r e n t m o d e ; o n e p h a n t a s m i c s e q u e n c e , f o r e x a m p l e , c e l e b r a t e s a M o r o c c a n f u n e r a l : " T h e h o g is d r e s s e d i n a j e l l a b a , a k e i f pipe j u t s f r o m its m o u t h , o n e h o o f h o l d s a p a c k e t o f feelthy pictures, a m e z u z z o t h h a n g s a b o u t its n e c k s [sic]. . .. I n s c r i b e d o n t h e c o f f i n : ' T h i s w a s t h e n o b l e s t A r a b o f a l l ' " (95). S e v e r a l i n t e r v i e w e r s since t h e sixties h a v e p e r s i s t e n t l y p r e s s e d Bowles t o p e r f o r m the t i m e - h o n o r e d task o f the travel writer a n d authoritatively s u m m a r i z e " M o r o c c a n culture." Bowles's characteris tic r e s p o n s e s h a v e b e e n a d r o i t a n d c o y . H i s r e p l y t o o n e q u e s t i o n , f o r instance, w a s , No
M o r o c c a n w i l l e v e r tell y o u w h a t h e t h i n k s , o r d o e s , o r
means.
H e ' l l t e l l y o u s o m e o f it a n d tell y o u o t h e r t h i n g s t h a t a r e c o m p l e t e l y false a n d t h e n w e a v e t h e m t o g e t h e r i n t o a v e r y b e l i e v a b l e c o r e , w h i c h you
s w a l l o w , a n d that's w h a t ' s considered civilized. W h a t ' s the pur
pose o f telling the truth? ( C a p o n i
66)
B o w l e s ' s a p p a r e n t reticence gives the impression that h e has c a n nily p l u m b e d f a r beneath the cultural surface; in contrast, B u s i — i n line w i t h c o n t e m p o r a r y c o n v e n t i o n s o f " r e a d i n g c u l t u r e s " — r e g a r d s t h e c h a l l e n g e as i n h e r e n t in c o d e s t h a t t h e v i s i t o r m u s t c r a c k : " I k n o w w h e r e I a m u n b e a t a b l e in a c q u i r i n g i n five m i n u t e s w h a t is e s s e n t i a l in t h e e t h i c a l c o d e s o f a n y p e o p l e o r s o c i a l c l a s s . . . . T h e i m p o r t a n t
11
1
U I ' . N O H H A M I ' 1 1111M IH O U U U ' S
147
t h i n g is n o t t o h i t t h e n a i l o n t h e h e a d r i g h t a w a y b u t n o t c o m m i t h o w l e r s r i g h t a w a y " (44). B u s i o f f e r s a l i n e o f r e a s o n i n g : M o r o c c a n c u l t u r e is s o d o m i t i c a l . B u t s o d o m y is i m b r i c a t e d i n a t i s s u e o f e t h i c a l c o d e s a n d p r a c t i c e s ; t h e v i s i t i n g W e s t e r n e r s h o u l d assess t h e s e c o d e s rather t h a n indulge the illusion o f a liberated h e d o n i s m — t h e c a n n y s e x u a l t o u r i s t is t h e o n e w h o " l e a v e s [his] p s y c h o l o g i z i n g a t h o m e " (39). A r m e d w i t h t h i s a t t i t u d e , B u s i e n v e l o p e s f r a n k r e p o r t s o f s e x u a l episodes in witty discourses o n the writer a n d writing, c o n t e m p o r a r y l i t e r a r y t h e o r y , a n d s u b j e c t i v i t y . A n d , n o less, o n t r a v e l a n d t r a v e l w r i t i n g : " T h i s is a n o - t r a v e l a n d n o - s e x b o o k , " h e d e c l a r e s a t o n e p o i n t , s i g n a l i n g his a v e r s i o n t o " t r a v e l j o u r n a l s a n d t r a v e l
literature"
(65). T h e a p h o r i s m t h a t f o l l o w s — " P e o p l e w h o d i s c o v e r n o t h i n g u s u a l l y d i s c o v e r g e o g r a p h y " (65)—is c h a r a c t e r i s t i c a l l y
ironic,
demon
strating the extent o f Busi's impatience f o r t h e travel writer's s o d i e s o f n a t u r e . Sodomies
in Elevenpoint,
f o r a l l t h a t , is a b o n a
rhap fide
t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e , w h i c h d i s c l a i m s its o w n s t a t u s p a r t l y i n o r d e r t o c l e a r a cant-free space f o r its o w n resistances a n d assertions. B u s i m o s t n o t i c e a b l y resists t h e s o r t o f d o m e s t i c a t i o n s t h a t e a r l i e r
American
expatriates h a d p e r f o r m e d . H e foregrounds, for e x a m p l e , the colonial r e l a t i o n s t h a t e n a b l e his o w n s e x u a l p l e a s u r e : " t h e w h i t e m a n . . . w h i l e h e fills t h e bellies o f t h r e e g e n e r a t i o n s o f m i x e d b l o o d , lets h i m s e l f b e s t u f f e d , c o m f o r t a b l y s e r v e d a n d r e v e r e d . C o l o n i a l s h u d d e r s ! " (38). M o r e forcefully, h ereports the c o m m e n t o f an " e d u c a t e d M o r o c c a n s t a l l i o n , " w h o tells h i m . T h e t o u r i s t s d o n ' t g r a n t u s a g l a n c e t h a t i s n o t sentimental—that say
erotic. . . . T h e public organizations a n d the Jewish
is t o
shop-and
h o t e l - o w n e r s tell t h e m w e a r e a l l t h i e v e s — t h i e v e s a n d r a p i s t s a n d murderers, a n d the tourists give u s a w i d e berth o r c o m e u p t o u s only sufficiently to take o u r measurements.
(60)
F o r B u s i , the sexual pleasure h e takes ( a n d gives) a m o u n t s t o " m a x i m u m privilege"
(217).
A setting free f r o m q u o t i d i a n life, it d o e s n o t
n e e d a t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e t o j u s t i f y i t ; a n d it is o n t h i s b a s i s t h a t B u s i o f f e r s h i s o w n fiction as " n o n - h e t e r o s e x u a l . " B u s i ' s s h a r p e s t e p i s o d e o f t r a v e l / s e x i n M o r o c c o , h o w e v e r , is f a r f r o m t h e i r o n i c h e d o n i s m t h a t g e n e r a l l y i n f o r m s his w o r k . T h e e p i s o d e recalls t h e B o w l e s - M r a b e t a c c o u n t o f t h e d o u b l y v i o l a t e d S p a n i s h b o y s i n Look and Move On; i n it, B u s i d r a m a t i z e s t h e l i n k b e t w e e n c o l o n i a l i s m a n d t h e M o r o c c a n s e x u a l e c o n o m y , i n w h i c h t h e s e x u a l a s s a u l t is s t a g e d as t h e c o l o n i z e d ' s v i n d i c t i v e r a g e . A s c h o o l t e a c h e r a c q u a i n t a n c e
I4H
1 o 111
WITH
I VI'UWHITltH.S
| | f Busi's, Said, h a s t a k e n h i m t o a B e r b e r village in the H i g h A t l a s . Said has invited t w o other b o y s a l o n g t o the village w h e r e h e teaches. The three o f t h e m subject B u s i , virtually i m p r i s o n e d i n the h o u s e , t o r e p e a t e d r a p e . T h e least c o m p r e h e n s i b l e , a t h i c k s e t b l a c k , is t h e l a s t t o join t h e i n v i t a t i o n t o r a p e . P r o v i d i n g this latter w i t h oral satisfaction, Uusi realizes: " I h a v e t o m a k e h i m c o m e publicly i f I w a n t t o h a v e a n y further h o p e o f saving myself, I m u s t m a k e h i m the equal o f the other t w o " (84). I n k e e p i n g w i t h h i s c a n d i d — e v e n b r u t a l — u n v e i l i n g o f t h e colonial d y n a m i c , B u s i attaches his o w n a i m o f escape t o the necessity o f " r o b b i n g [ t h e b l a c k ' s ] h a t r e d o f m e o f its d r a m a " (84). T h r o u g h o u t his n o t a b l y laconic accounts o f sodomitical e n c o u n ters i n M o r o c c o , B u s i insists t h a t s u c h i n t e r c u l t u r a l e n g a g e m e n t s h a v e n o t h i n g essential a b o u t t h e m . T h e y a r e m a d e possible b y m a t e r i a l f e a tures o f c u l t u r a l e x c h a n g e a n d specific life-practices; g e n e r a l i z a t i o n s a l o n g t h e lines o f " M o r o c c o is a b i s e x u a l c u l t u r e " c a n n o t u n i v e r s a l i z e h o m o s e x u a l experience f r o m t h e p o i n t o f view o f either individual desire o r g l o b a l g e o g r a p h y a n d h i s t o r y . N e v e r t h e l e s s , t h e i m p u l s e t o u n i v e r s a l i z e — t o erase specificities o f t i m e , p l a c e , a n d c u l t u r e — r e m a i n s strong. T h e assimilative tendencies o f N o r t h A f r i c a n travel narratives like B o w l e s ' s a n d B u s i ' s h a v e r e c e n t l y b e e n m a t c h e d b y e t h n o g r a p h i c lexis l o c a t i n g h o m o s e x u a l societies i n t h e S o u t h Pacific, p a r t i c u l a r l y I P a p u a ) N e w G u i n e a . G i l b e r t H e r d t (Ritualized Homosexuality in Melanesia, 1984) h a s p i o n e e r e d t h i s field, w r i t i n g o f t r i b a l s o c i a l c u s t o m a n d ritual i n a d o p t i o n practices; o f wife e x c h a n g e a n d t h e p r o d u c t i o n of male potency through semen transmission. T o b i a s Schneebaum, fol l o w i n g H e r d t , h a s p r o d u c e d a n i n v e n t o r y o f these practices in his l p s e u d o ) e t h n o g r a p h i c t r a v e l o g u e Where the Spirits Dwell (1988): T h e p e o p l e o f the S o u t h C a s u a r i n a C o a s t d i d n o t h a v e the great raids a n d h e a d h u n t i n g ceremonies o f t h e n o r t h a n d n o r t h w e s t . T h e y h a d n o k n o w n rites of passage t h a t d e m a n d e d heads f o r i n i t i a t i o n , t h o u g h this w a s true f u r t h e r s o u t h a m o n g the M a r i n d A n i m , w h e r e m a s c u l i n i t y w a s s t i m u l a t e d i n y o u n g s t e r s b y t h e a b s o r p t i o n of semen t h r o u g h s o d o m y w i t h older males. T h e A s m a t also believe t h a t semen has m a g i c a l qualities, a l t h o u g h c o n c e p t i o n conies a b o u t f r o m t h e spirit w o r l d . I t is, h o w e v e r , o n l y t h r o u g h repeated acts o f sexual intercourse t h a t the fetus will g r o w . W i t h o u t a c o n s t a n t b u i l d u p o f semen from a n u m b e r o f different mules, including the h u s b a n d , the child will n o t be b o r n n o r m a l a n d healthy. In the same w a y . . . a b o y becomes increasingly masculine 11 rid g r o w s more q u i c k l y as he takes in mine a n d m o r e soman us the piuoiive p i u l n o r in s o d o m y . (1X1)
1.1
R-L l ' i r
11. .
1
1111
H I I " 11 ' 1-1
1
•
1 |v
T h i s s o u n d s like t h e k i n d o f s u m m a r y t h a t m i g h t issue f r o m a m o r e fully researched analysis b y a professional such as G i l b e r t H e r d t . S u c h s u m m a r y accounts, however, are embedded in autobiography a n d experience, merely advertising the traveler's personal investments a n d anxieties. F o r S c h n e e b a u m , these concerns are centered o n his quest f o r a c c o m m o d a t i n g places w h e r e h e m i g h t be able t o live o u t his h o m o sexuality u n a s h a m e d . H i s travels, i n effect, a r e a " g o i n g o u t " o f A m e r ica t o places w h e r e h e need n o t h i d e " a vital p a r t " o f himself: Why
d i d I h a v e to g o o u t o f m y c o u n t r y , o u t o f m y f a m i l y , t o find t h e
kind o f assurance and c o m p a n i o n s h i p necessary to m y inner peace? Why
d i d n o o n e tell m e e a r l y o n t h a t I w a s n o t a l o n e ? W h y was I
i t is l i k e t o b e h o m o s e x u a l — t h e s u f f e r i n g a n d f r u s t r a t i o n
of what o f always
h i d i n g a v i t a l p a r t o f o n e ' s b e i n g ? (43)
'
always guilty? W h a t can heterosexual men and w o m e n k n o w
W i t h the A s m a t o f N e w G u i n e a , S c h n e e b a u m finds a functioning cul ture that a n s w e r s t o his o w n sexual needs, fostering i n t i m a t e s a m e - s e x relationships
a n d a u t h o r i z i n g s o d o m i t i c a l c o n n e c t i o n s . A l t h o u g h it
s e e m s a t t i m e s a s i f S c h n e e b a u m is r e m o v i n g t h e s e p r a c t i c e s f r o m t h e A s m a t a s a s p e c i f i c c u l t u r a l b o d y ( h e " f e l t f o r t h e first t i m e p a r t o f a universal c l a n " [43]), he generally takes care t o l i n k t h e m t o t h e i m p e r a t i v e s o f a g r o u p life. S c h n e e b a u m finds a c l o s e r c o n n e c t i o n b e t w e e n h i s o w n n e e d f o r h o m o s e x u a l exchange a n d A s m a t cultural practice i n the institution o f mbai o r " e x c h a n g e f r i e n d , " a n a s p e c t o f t h e c u l t u r e t h a t a m e m b e r o f t h e t r i b e , A k a t p i t s j i n , t e a c h e s h i m . A l t h o u g h h e is a l r e a d y b o u n d b y a p e r m a n e n t mbai c o n t r a c t , A k a t p i t s j i n still c h o o s e s S c h n e e b a u m a s a t e m p o r a r y " e x c h a n g e friend," c o n s u m m a t i n g t h e relationship in t h e act o f " b a l a n c i n g " ( e n g a g i n g i n reciprocal
s o d o m y ) with his white
g u e s t . S u b s e q u e n t l y , S c h n e e b a u m is a b l e t o f o r m a l i z e h i s p r a c t i c a l k n o w l e d g e i n a seminar w i t h A k a t p i t s j i n a n d others o f the tribe: It a s t o u n d e d m e t h a t e v e r y t h i n g w a s s o o p e n , t h a t e v e r y o n e k n e w w h a t w e n t o n between Akatpitsjin a n d myself, that old m e n listened talked and y o u n g boys, too. Akatpitsjin even called m e his wife, startling m e . E v e r y o n e k n e w w h a t
mbai d i d
mbai i n
and
front o f
together a n d there
a p p e a r e d n o reason not to discuss all aspects o f the relationship. T h e y obviously trusted m e completely and even paired off to s h o w m e w h o s e
mbai w a s
whose, allowing me to take photographs.
(195)
32
T h e subject's d o c u m e n t e d experience p r o d u c e s a m o m e n t o f a n t h r o p o l o g i c a l d i s c o v e r y o n e t h a i , h o w e v e r m u c h it m i g h t i n v i l e t h e r e a d e r ' s I5<>
11 Ml l< IS'I tt W i l l i I V I'l.W
1(
1 I I' MS
skepticism, mediates the romantic white d r e a m o f incorporation with ;the c u l t u r a l l y " o t h e r " b o d y . I T h e a m a z i n g f i n a l s e q u e n c e t h a t a c t s as a c o d a t o Where the Spir its Dwell p r o j e c t s S c h n e e b a u m ' s n a r r a t i v e i n t o t h e m o r e e x t r e m e f a n tasy r e a l m s o f transgression, signaling t h e travel tale's trajectory t o w a r d a n d across limits: territorial, textual, cultural, a n d sexual. I n t h e s e q u e n c e , S c h n e e b a u m d r e a m s t h a t h e is i n t h e v e r y d i f f e r e n t l a n d scape o f the artists' c o l o n y a t Y a d d o , r u n n i n g i n a w i n t r y N e w Y o r k l a n d s c a p e — l a k e s , ice, n o r t h e r n t r e e s — o n h i s w a y t o j o i n a l u n c h e o n feast. A b r u p t l y , A k a t p i t s j i n a p p e a r s a t t h e d o o r a n d o r d e r s p o a c h e d crocodile's eggs. T h e n J a n e t F r a m e , the eccentric N e w Z e a l a n d n o v e l ist, a p p e a r s . A l l t h e g u e s t s , i t t r a n s p i r e s , a r e p a r t o f o n e f a m i l y . A k a t p i t s j i n , s p e a k i n g " w i t h a c l i p p e d B r i t i s h a c c e n t " (202), c o n f i r m s t h a t t h e r e is i n d e e d s e x b e t w e e n three p e o p l e . S u d d e n l y h e s h o o t s a l l t h e guests e x c e p t f o r F r a m e a n d S c h n e e b a u m , a n d t h e y p r o c e e d t o eat the flesh o f t h e s l a i n . S c h n e e b a u m a w a k e s t o f i n d h i m s e l f l y i n g w i t h A k a t pitsjin, w h o p r o c e e d s t o i n f o r m his c o m p a n i o n o f t h e A s m a t p r o t o c o l s f o r s e x b e t w e e n t h r e e p e o p l e (203). S c h n e e b a u m ' s w o r k locates the project o f liberating the gendered s u b j e c t i n t h e s p a c e — p h y s i c a l , g e o g r a p h i c a l , c u l t u r a l — o f a fieldw o r k e d " o t h e r . " I n s o d o i n g , h e d r a w s a t t e n t i o n t o t h e close links between travel writing a n d e t h n o g r a p h y . B o t h discursive categories are partly f o u n d e d o n liberatory premises, travel writing privileging a putatively free, m o b i l e , t r a n s f o r m a t i v e subject a n d e t h n o g r a p h y a cul t u r a l l y d e f i n e d , fixed, y e t p o t e n t i a l l y t r a n s f o r m i n g s p a c e . T h e s e c a t e gories j o i n together i n a n unstable e q u a t i o n that the m a l e traveler o f same-sex o r i e n t a t i o n — h o m o s e x u a l , gay, o r q u e e r — m u s t interrogate. S u c h is t h e p r o j e c t o f E d m u n d W h i t e ' s e x p l o r a t i o n o f p r e - A I D S A m e r i c a i n t h e p e r i o d o f g a y l i b e r a t i o n , States of Desire: Travels in Gay America (1980). T h e t i t l e i t s e l f r e f e r e n c e s b o t h sides o f t h e e q u a t i o n , since t h e " s t a t e " c o r r e s p o n d s b o t h t o t h e d e s i r i n g , t r a v e l i n g s u b j e c t a n d l o t h e g e o p o l i t i c a l t e r r a i n t h r o u g h w h i c h h e t r a v e l s . W h i t e is a r e l u c tant traveler, a n y t h i n g b u t n o m a d i c a l l y inclined, a n d his b o o k vacil lates b e t w e e n t h e i n f o r m a t i v e m o d e o f t h e g u i d e b o o k a n d t h e p e r s o n a l , a n e c d o t a l style o f the t r a v e l o g u e . " T h o u g h t r a v e l i n g s o u n d s g l a m o r o u s , " W h i t e observes, " I f o u n d it a r d u o u s a n d alienating. L i s t e n i n g l o o t h e r p e o p l e a n d s e l d o m t a l k i n g is f r u s t r a t i n g f o r s o m e o n e as o p i n ionated as 1 a m . E a t i n g a l o n e a n d sleeping in rented r o o m s c a n b e d e p r e s s i n g " (334). W h i t e , h o w e v e r a l i e n a t e d h e m a y feel, f o c u s e s o n l lie r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n g a y d e s i r i n g S U B J E C L N m i d I h e v a r i o u s " s l a t e s " i n 3 3
(II!NIM:U
ANI»
O T H K U
NTOLLLLT.LII'i
w h i c h t h e y live, s e a r c h i n g o u t h o w g a y life o r g a n i z e s itself socially i n a representative scattering o f u r b a n e n v i r o n m e n t s in the U n i t e d States. H e recognizes that g a y s construct i n d i v i d u a l a n d g r o u p identities, a l o n g w i t h w a y s o f a c t i n g , w i t h i n a series o f specific a n d h i s t o r i c i z e d s o c i a l s e t t i n g s . H e t h u s c o n v e r s e s w i t h c l o s e t e d g a y s , as w e l l as p a r t i c i p a t i n g i n social e n c o u n t e r s w i t h gays w h o , t h o u g h " o u t , " f o r m special ized, private communities. W h i t e ' s w o r k highlights problems f o r the wider category o f travel writing b y complicating the relationship between a n " o u t " w o r l d a n da "closet." Isherwood's Berlin, Busi's M o r o c c o , a n d S c h n e e b a u m ' s N e w G u i n e a all r e p r e s e n t m o r e o r less liberated terrains f o r their respective visitors; b u t they a r e liberated precisely because, f r o m a historicized global perspective, they are spe cialized a r e a s — t h e " f r e e z o n e " emerges i n effect as m e r e l y a n o t h e r k i n d o f closet. W h i t e ' s w o r k seems t o p o s i t i o n h i m w i t h i n t h e g a y liberationist discourse o f p o s t - S t o n e w a l l A m e r i c a , b u t h e also prefigures a n e m e r g e n t q u e e r d i s c o u r s e i n his a t t r a c t i o n t o w a r d a c o n s t r u c t i o n i s t , p e r f o r m a t i v e m o d e l o f self-definition. A t o n e p o i n t he declares himself t o b e " a n a f f i c i o n a d o o f t h e p r o v i s i o n a l " (154), a c k n o w l e d g i n g h o w g a y s i n v e n t a n d stage themselves differently i n differing settings: L i k e N i e t z s c h e . . . w e c o u l d s p e a k o f the " g a y science," that o b l i g a tory existentialism forced on people w h o must invent themselves. . . . O n c e o n e d i s c o v e r s t h a t o n e is g a y , o n e m u s t c h o o s e e v e r y t h i n g , f r o m h o w to w a l k , dress a n d talk to w h e r e to live, w i t h w h o m and o n w h a t t e r m s . (16)
C o n t e s t i n g R i c h a r d S e n n e t t ' s a s s e r t i o n t h a t m o d e r n m a n is " a n a c t o r w i t h o u t a s t a g e , " W h i t e finds N e w Y o r k t o b e a p r e e m i n e n t s p a c e f o r p e r f o r m i n g t h e self: o n t h e streets o f N e w Y o r k h e is o u t " t o farmi vivo, as t h e I t a l i a n s s a y , t o ' m a k e m y s e l f a l i v e ' i n a r e s p o n s i v e a n d o b s e r v i n g p u b l i c " (286). O f c o u r s e , N e w Y o r k is a s p e c i a l p l a c e . W h i t e r e a l i z e s t h a t h e c o u l d n o t c l a i m t h e s a m e l i b e r t i e s i n m a n y o t h e r w o r l d cities; t h a t t h e p e r f o r m a n c e o f sex a n d s e x u a l i t y is a l w a y s p a r t o f a l a r g e r c u l t u r a l a n d site-specific p r o d u c t i o n . 3 4
W h i t e deploys b o t h gay liberationist a n d queer p e r f o r m a t i v e m o d els i n h i s c h a r t i n g o f g a y A m e r i c a ; h e t h u s d e m o n s t r a t e s t h e i m p o s s i bility o f p r o d u c i n g a n y consistent account o f h o w the traveler brings h i s ( h o m o ) s e x u a l i t y t o b e a r o n h i s t r a v e l s , o r o f p r o v i d i n g a n y fixed m o d e l f o r the discourse o f g a y / q u e e r travel. W h i l e g a y / q u e e r travelers locale spaces that p r o m i s e l o p r o v i d e ( o r d o p r o v i d e ) p e r f o r m a t i v e I .
I' MJHtN 1 • u 1 1
11
1 v 11
>v|tj
runs
IJfreedom, these selfsame spaces are b e h o l d e n t o specific c o d e s t h a t c o n strain p e r f o r m a n c e . E v e r y t r a v e l o g u e u l t i m a t e l y discloses a different r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n s e l f a n d ( c u l t u r a l ) s p a c e i n w h i c h t h e l a t t e r is e r o t i c i z e d — a n d sexualized—through nuances o f perception. O n e o f the m o r e d i s t i n c t i v e t r a v e l o g u e s i n t h e s e t e r m s is t h a t o f a n o t h e r W h i t e , P a t r i c k , w h o s e a c c o u n t o f his t r a v e l s i n t h e G r e e k i s l a n d s f o r m s a secl i o n o f his a u t o b i o g r a p h y Flaws in the Glass (1981). A l t h o u g h (Patrick) W h i t e pays statutory tribute to that darling o f travel w r i t e r s , P a t r i c k L e i g h F e r m o r . his r e c o r d o f his travels in G r e e c e a n d the G r e e k Islands could h a r d l y be further f r o m L e i g h t e r m o r ' s , o r L a w r e n c e D u r r e l l ' s . W h i t e sets o u t t o s h o w " h o w [ t h e G r e e k islands] a d d t o this self-portrait I h a v e u n d e r t a k e n , a n d [to] the m o s t i m p o r t a n t r e l a t i o n s h i p o f m y l i f e " (171). W h i t e is r e f e r r i n g h e r e t o h i s c o m p a n i o n s h i p w i t h M a n o l y L a s c a r i s , w h o m h e h a d first m e t in A l e x a n d r i a d u r i n g t h e S e c o n d W o r l d W a r , w h o l a t e r a c c o m p a n i e d him back to Australia and a lifelong relationship, a n d w i t h w h o m he t r a v e r s e d G r e e c e a n d its o f f s h o r e i s l a n d s o n s e v e r a l o c c a s i o n s . W h i t e , l i k e B u s i , is a n a c e r b i c t r a v e l e r : t o u r i s t s i r r i t a t e ; f o o d d i s g u s t s ; c e l e b r a t e d sights d i s a p p o i n t , disillusion e v e n . N o t h i n g c o u l d be f u r t h e r f r o m the traveler's characteristic blend o f scenery a n d society w i t h r o m a n c e t h a n W h i t e ' s c a n t a n k e r o u s c h r o n i c l i n g o f his j o u r n e y s through Greece with M a n o l y . White's frankness and candid vulgar ity d o m a n a g e t o p r o d u c e t h e o c c a s i o n a l i l l u m i n a t e d m o m e n t o f travel: " A n y G r e c o p h i l e will u n d e r s t a n d w h e n I say that the unsinkable c o n d o m a n d the smell o f shit w h i c h precede the m o m e n t o f illu m i n a t i o n [ a first g l i m p s e o f O l y m p u s ] m a k e it m o r e r e w a r d i n g w h e n it h a p p e n s " (157). 3 5
W h i t e p e p p e r s his n a r r a t i v e w i t h v i v i d c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n s t h a t s u g gest a c a m p , o p e r a t i c p e r c e p t i o n : " O r t h o d o x m o n k s s c r e a m l i k e e n r a g e d q u e e n s " (158), a n d " e x q u i s i t e a c o l y t e s t i t t u p e d o n s o m e e r r a n d f o r a n i m p e r i o u s s u p e r i o r " (160). Y e t h e s t a y s a w a y f r o m f a m i l i a r m o d e s o f sexual suggestiveness: n o arch i n n u e n d o s , n o gentle h o m o e r o t i c i s m , n o b r a v u r a sexual e x p l o i t s . W h i t e enlists t h e G r e e k islands, r a t h e r , as a s p a c e i n a n d t h r o u g h w h i c h h e c a n e x p l o r e his r e l a t i o n s h i p w i t h M a n o l y . I f t h e y a r e o n a p i l g r i m a g e , W h i t e s u g g e s t s , it is o n e s p l i t b e t w e e n " m y l u s t i n g s p i r i t a n d M a n o l y ' s o r t h o d o x d e v o t i o n " (177). W h i l e p e r s i s t e n t l y p u r s u e s " t h e idea o f " G r e e c e (175), m o v i n g f r o m dellalion to the edge o f disillusionment. T h e m o r e patient M a n o l y a c c u s e s W h i l e o f h a l i n g G r e e c e , s p u i rimj, h i m t o r e e x a m i n e his r e l a t i o n s h i p w i t h his l o v e r : 1
t . H N P I 1 \ M O 1 > 1 III 1»: I I- • 'i i' 1 1 '
1,1
[ E a c h o f a disparate g r o u p o f islands] p l a y s a p a r t i c u l a r role in m y relationship
with
Greece
and
Manoly.
Over
and
over . . . when
M a n o l y tells m e I h a t e G r e e c e , I c a n n o t e x p l a i n m y love. . . . I c a n n o t p r o v e that w h a t I believe in m o s t d e e p l y , the n o v e l s for w h i c h m y c o n s c i o u s self c a n ' t t a k e full r e s p o n s i b i l i t y , o u r d i s c o m f o r t i n g e x h i l a r a t i n g t r a v e l s t h r o u g h G r e e c e , o u r l i f e t o g e t h e r , its
but
eruptions
a n d r e w a r d s , m y o w n c l u m s y w r e s t l i n g w i t h w h a t I see a s a r e l i g i o u s f a i t h — t h a t a l l o f t h i s i s w h a t k e e p s m e g o i n g . (187-88)
" T r a v e l s t h r o u g h G r e e c e " turn o u t t o b e travels w i t h , a n d t h r o u g h , M a n o l y ; a n d these a r e , tautologically,
" w h a t keeps [the traveler]
going." S u c h a disarmingly casual, y e t startling, e l a b o r a t i o n o f the triang u l a t i o n b e t w e e n self, c o m p a n i o n , a n d p l a c e t w i s t s t h e c o m m o n p l a c e " b a d t r i p , " q u e e r i n g it i n t o a n e n c o u n t e r b e t w e e n a n t i t r a v e l e r a n d o v e r d e t e r m i n e d s p a c e . W h i t e , i n i n t e r r o g a t i v e m o d e , s u g g e s t s as m u c h by w o n d e r i n g : " L a c e r a t i o n s ["Lascarations"?] alternating w i t h visions: is t h i s w h a t h o o k s t h e m o r e p e r v e r s e G r e c o p h i l e ? " (162). P a t r i c k W h i t e ' s j o u r n e y s suggest t h e scope f o r associating g a y travel w i t h m e m o r y a n d desire rather t h a n free spaces, w i t h personal a n d p h e n o m e n a l differences rather t h a n w i t h quests f o r gay-liberated territories. E d m u n d W h i t e , m e a n w h i l e , w r i t i n g a t t h e e n d o f the " g a y l i b e r a t i o n " era, concedes t h a t f o r w o m e n a n d g a y s (as f o r o t h e r m i n o r i ties) " t h e g o a l h a s a l w a y s b e e n a c h a n g e i n o u r s o c i e t y t h a t w o u l d b r i n g equality o f opportunity a n d restored dignity a n d a u t o n o m y t o all" (62). H e m a k e s c l e a r , t h o u g h , t h a t t h e r e is a s i g n i f i c a n t i m p e d i m e n t t o this g o a l ' s a c h i e v e m e n t : " a steadfast denial o f the real sources o f p o w e r i n o u r s o c i e t y , i.e., m o n e y . R i c h a n d m i d d l e - c l a s s g a y s a r e n o t l i k e l y t o identify w i t h t h e p o o r ; they retain a loyalty t o m e m b e r s o f their o w n c l a s s , w h e t h e r s t r a i g h t o r g a y " (62).
36
T o theorize the writing o f h o m o
s e x u a l / g a y / q u e e r t r a v e l e r s is t o c o n f r o n t , o n c e m o r e , t h e p r o b l e m o f t h e p r i v i l e g e o f t h e t r a v e l e r — t h e o n e w h o s e " l i b e r a t i o n " is l i k e l y t o t a k e t h e f o r m o f e x p l o i t a t i v e license, o r t h e o n e , p u l l e d this w a y a n d t h a t , w h o s e " t o u r i s t m a p [is c o n t i n u a l l y ]
traversed b y n e w trails"
( H o l l i n g h u r s t 99). I n b o t h c a s e s , w h a t m u s t c l e a r l y b e r e s i s t e d is t h e a l l t o o - e a s y i m p u l s e t o c e l e b r a t e t r a v e l e i t h e r a s necessarily as essentially
perceptive o r
liberating. T h e n e x t c h a p t e r takes this a r g u m e n t i n a
slightly different direction, l o o k i n g at t h e s u p p o s e d l y l i b e r a t o r y dis course
o f p o s t m o d e r n i s m , a n d at t h e g r o u n d
it o p e n s
up for
textual/generic play. In negotiating the tensions between playfulness
1v |
1 oniuft i s w i i i i 1
iM.wwTitKs
I^nd r e s p o n s i b i l i t y , t h e c h a p t e r a l s o s u g g e s t s t h a t t r a v e l w r i t i n g ' s a e s t h e t i c f e a t u r e s m a y b e a t o d d s w i t h its e t h i c a l c r e d o s ; a n d t h a t its c a p a c i t y t o reflect o n i t s e l f r i s k s b e i n g a c c u s e d o f s e l f - i n d u l g e n c e i n a p o s t m o d e r n era characterized b y destructive o v e r c o n s u m p t i o n , a n d b y the split b e t w e e n m a t e r i a l e x h a u s t i o n a n d t e x t u a l excess.
<;i'NI>l'.l< A N D O T W ' i
i !»••!• 0 1 i
Chapter four Postmodern Itineraries
1
!I
VIRTUAL I
PLACES:
THE
TRAVEL
AND
HYPERREAL
T h e celebratory rhetoric o f travel—its perceived capacity t o o p e n u p n e w e p i s t e m o l o g i c a l , as w e l l as g e o g r a p h i c a l , h o r i z o n s — h a s b e e n a s s o ciated in recent years w i t h t h e " d i s r u p t i v e " discourses o f p o s t m o d e r n i s m . A t f i r s t b l u s h , i t c e r t a i n l y s e e m s t h e r e ought t o b e a n a f f i n i t y b e t w e e n t r a v e l w r i t i n g a n d p o s t m o d e r n i s m ; f o r a m o n g its m a n y , n o t infrequently contradictory features, p o s t m o d e r n theory f o r e g r o u n d s the instability o f the h u m a n subject, shifting ontologies o f space a n d place, a n d the u n d e r m i n i n g o f linear history, w h i c h characteristically assumes a fractured o r palimpsestic structure. I n short, the traditional narrative g r o u n d that m o d e r n i s t texts w e r e already testing h a s col l a p s e d — o r s u c h is t h e c l a i m — i n t o p e r s p e c t i v i s m a n d r a d i c a l c o n t i n gency. O n e m i g h t expect such relativizing features n o t just t o occur in, but t o b e necessary t o , travel narratives. Travelers tend t o present themselves, after all, as u n u s u a l l y flexible p e o p l e , w h o are m o r e o p e n t h a n m o s t t o a l i e n a t i n g experience, a n d w h o seek o u t places t h a t d e f y q u o t i d i a n expectation a n d p r e f o r m e d assessment. T h e traditional mis trust o f travel n a r r a t i v e s — a s i f truth-seeking readers h a d already anticipated a n d prefigured their unstable narrative g r o u n d — s h o w s u p in t h e p o p u l a r d i s a r m i n g p h r a s e " t r a v e l e r s ' tales": tales t h a t i n v i t e a healthy skepticism. 1
A l l t h e same, postmodernist devices h a v e n o t so consistently in filtrated t h e I r a v e l b o o k as t h e y h a v e t h e c o n t e m p o r a r y n o v e l . P e r haps travel writing, as genre, has r e m a i n e d relatively i m m u n e precisely b e c a u s e o f its p r a c t i t i o n e r s ' n e e d t o d e f e n d a n d its r e a d e r s ' t o i n o c u -
i s;
l a t e — t h e m s e l v e s a g a i n s t c o n t a m i n a t i o n b y t r a v e l e r s ' lies. A t s o m e p o i n t , it m i g h t b e a r g u e d , b o t h p a r t i e s n e e d t o a p p e a l t o t h e " a u t h e n t i c ity s t a n d a r d " — t o envision the possibility o f " n e w " a n d " g e n u i n e " expe rience, even i f that n o v e l t y a n d that genuineness a r e simultaneously a c k n o w l e d g e d as d o o m e d . I n f a c t , t h e b u l k o f w o r k s t h a t c u r r e n t l y a p p e a r o n b o o k s h e l v e s as " t r a v e l b o o k s " a d h e r e t o o n e m o d e r n i s t p a r a d i g m o r a n o t h e r . E q u a l l y , travelers c o n t i n u e b y a n d large t o a s s u m e stable experiential identities, a n d t o present their destinations, g u a r a n t e e d b y g e o g r a p h y a n d h i s t o r y , a s o n t o l o g i c a l l y s e c u r e . P a r a d o x i c a l l y , it often seems that the potentially transgressive, destabilizing character o f t r a v e l seeks a c o m p e n s a t o r y s t a b i l i t y i n b o t h its s u b j e c t a n d its d e s t i n a t i o n . T h e t y p i c a l t r a v e l b o o k ( i n s o f a r as it c a n e v e r b e a g r e e d u p o n t h a t s u c h a c r e a t u r e e x i s t s ) c o n t i n u e s t o c l e a v e t o m o d e r n realist c o n v e n t i o n s . W h e n p o s t m o d e r n i s m i m p i n g e s o n t r a v e l w r i t i n g , t h e n , it u s u a l l y does s o o b l i q u e l y , u n d e r t h e sign o f " m e t a " : m e t a t r a v e l , m e t a h i s t o r y , m e t a g e o g r a p h y , metafiction. P o s t m o d e r n i s t travel b o o k s are almost i n v a r i a b l y m e t a n a r r a t i v e s , reflecting o n their o w n status as t e x t s — a s theoretical t e x t s — o n t r a v e l . T h i s s e c t i o n e x a m i n e s s o m e r e c e n t a n d notable instances o f such metanarratives, f r o m suggestive revisionings o f s p a c e , site, a n d d e s t i n a t i o n i n C a l v i n o , t h r o u g h t h e s e m i o t i c s a n d hyperrealism o f Barthes, E c o , and Baudrillard (linked, in Iyer, with a p o s t c o l o n i a l p e r s p e c t i v e ) , t o v a r i o u s , m o r e o r less s e l f - r e f l e x i v e c o n structions o f the traveling subject in C h a t w i n , D e s s a i x , a n d T h e r o u x . A s a b o d y , this w r i t i n g insistently a t t e n d s t o t h a t instability, i n b o t h terrain a n d subject, w h i c h tends t o b e elided in m o r e traditional types o f t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e . I t a l s o insists, t h r o u g h its e m p l o y m e n t o f p e r v a s i v e citation a n d intertextual inflection, o n t h e inseparability o f travel a n d w r i t i n g — a s i f all t r a v e l , t o b e n d P a t e r ' s a p h o r i s m , a s p i r e d t o t h e c o n d i t i o n o f literature. W h i l e s u c h " l i t e r a t u r e " c a n r e c a p i t u l a t e a ( t r a v e l ) site, it c a n n e v e r c a p t u r e it. I t a l o C a l v i n o ' s Invisible Cities (1974), a f a n t a s y o n M a r c o P o l o ' s c o n v e r s a t i o n s w i t h K u b l a K h a n , insists a c c o r d i n g l y o n t h e i r r e d u c i b i l i t y o f cities; as P o l o w a r n s t h e K h a n , " t h e c i t y m u s t n e v e r b e c o n f u s e d w i t h t h e w o r d s t h a t d e s c r i b e i t " (61). I n t h e c a s e o f A g l a u r a , o n e o f t h e m a n y cities c a n v a s s e d , n o t h i n g said o f [the city] is true, a n d yet these accounts create a solid a n d c o m p a c t i m a g e o f a city, whereas t h e h a p h a z a r d o p i n i o n s w h i c h m i g h t be inferred f r o m l i v i n g there h a v e less substance. T h i s is t h e result: the city that, they speak o f has m u c h o f w h a t is needed lo e x i s t , whereas the city that exists o n its sile, exists less, ( 6 7 ) I ;•>'
I I M I H I N I :. W I I I I
I t I ' M ' li I I I I I " ,
P o l o thus points t o t h e ambivalent, shifting valences o f w o r d s a n d things that are so g e r m a n e t o travel writing: t h e lived-in city irreducibly is, b u t i t s e x p e r i e n t i a l d i s c o u r s e s c a n n o t d e s c r i b e i t ; t h e c i t y , a s d e s c r i b e d f r o m t h e o u t s i d e , is not ( " n o t h i n g . . . is t r u e " ) , a n d y e t it r e p r e s e n t s " m u c h o f w h a t is n e e d e d t o e x i s t . " P o l o ' s d e s c r i p t i o n s , h o w e v e r precise, u l t i m a t e l y c o n d u c t their i n t e r l o c u t o r t o w a r d invisibility a n d immateriality. C a l v i n o ' s cities d o e x i s t i n f a c t , b u t a s f o r m a l , a b s t r a c t e n t i t i e s . T h e y are explicitly signal: synecdochic o f every o r g a n i z e d space, t h e y are c o n s t e l l a t i o n s o f signs t h a t r e d u p l i c a t e , r e a r r a n g e , a n d e v e n p r o j e c t t h e i r o w n m i r r o r a n d s h a d o w s y s t e m s . E a c h s t o p o n P o l o ' s i t i n e r a r y is a S a u s s u r e a n d e m o n s t r a t i o n ; s i n c e a " c i t y [is] m a d e o n l y o f d i f f e r e n c e s " (34), its d e s c r i p t i o n s e e m s a t o n c e s y s t e m a t i c a n d a r b i t r a r y , a n d " t h e passage f r o m o n e [city] t o a n o t h e r i n v o l v e d n o t a j o u r n e y b u t a c h a n g e o f e l e m e n t s " (43). C a l v i n o ' s r e a d e r m i g h t w e l l r e c a l l h e r e t h e effect o f t h o s e travel a c c o u n t s t h a t lead f r o m o n e locale t o a n o t h e r , dif ferentiating successive destinations t h r o u g h c o m p a r i s o n a n d c o n t r a s t , and often inducing a kind o f exhaustion—exasperation, e v e n — n o t unlike that b r o u g h t o n b y the K h a n ' s responses t o P o l o . T h e u n k n o w a b l e i n d i v i d u a l cities, i n r e l a t i o n t o " t h e c i t y " as a s y s t e m i c e n t i t y , a r e like S a u s s u r e ' s p a r o l e in r e l a t i o n t o l a n g u e : " e a c h m a n bears in h i s m i n d a c i t y m a d e u p o n l y o f d i f f e r e n c e s , a c i t y w i t h o u t figures a n d w i t h o u t f o r m , a n d t h e i n d i v i d u a l cities fill it u p " (34). A n d j u s t as S a u s s u r e ' s langue p o s t u l a t e s a p o i n t f r o m w h i c h t h e i d i o s y n c r a c i e s o f parole t a k e o n m e a n i n g , s o it is w i t h P o l o ' s c i t y : A l l o f E u d o x i a ' s c o n f u s i o n , the m u l e s ' b r a y i n g , the l a m p b l a c k stains, t h e f i s h s m e l l i s w h a t is e v i d e n t i n t h e i n c o m p l e t e p e r s p e c t i v e
you
g r a s p ; b u t t h e c a r p e t p r o v e s t h a t t h e r e is a p o i n t f r o m w h i c h t h e c i t y s h o w s its t r u e p r o p o r t i o n s , every, tiniest detail.
the
geometrical scheme
implicit in
its
(96)
Is t h e r e a s p a c e f o r t h e i n d i v i d u a l t r a v e l e r w i t h i n t h e o v e r a r c h i n g s y s tem? C a l v i n o suggests, t h r o u g h t h e evocative spareness o f P o l o ' s speech, t h e indeterminate a n d evanescent m o v e m e n t o f subjectivity: " I t is m o r e d i f f i c u l t t o fix o n t h e m a p t h e r o u t e s o f t h e s w a l l o w s , w h o cut the air o v e r the roofs, d r o p p i n g long invisible p a r a b o l a s w i t h their still w i n g s " (89). N o w o n d e r t h e K h a n u p b r a i d s h i m : " C o n f e s s w h a t y o u a r e s m u g g l i n g : m o o d s , s t a l e s o f g r a c e , e l e g i e s ! " (98). " C i t i e s , l i k e d r e a m s , " w e a r e told, "arc made o f desires uiui fears, e v e n i f the t h r e a d o f t h e i r d i s c o u r s e is secret. I h e i r I'MIIW iil't? a b s u r d , t h e i r p e r s p e c t i v e s I'll'. I Ml U H II1 1 I 1 1' I I ' I' U ' l i"
I v.
d e c e i t f u l , a n d e v e r y t h i n g c o n c e a l s s o m e t h i n g e l s e " (44). C a l v i n o ' s cities, t h e n , b r i n g t w o characteristic p o s t m o d e r n i s t v e c t o r s i n t o a l i g n m e n t : t h a t o f the abstract, a p p a r e n t l y static s y s t e m (the a r r a n g e m e n t ) ; a n d that o f — s e e m i n g l y w a v e r i n g — i n d i v i d u a l desire. T h e s e t w o vec tors begin t o conjoin, o r m o r e accurately t o m e r g e , i n the K h a n ' s gar d e n , w h e r e t h e d i s t i n c t i o n b e t w e e n i n n e r a n d o u t e r w o r l d s is m o m e n tarily elided: At
t h e m o m e n t w h e n I c o n c e n t r a t e a n d r e f l e c t , I find m y s e l f a g a i n ,
a l w a y s , in this g a r d e n , at this h o u r o f the e v e n i n g , in y o u r a u g u s t presence, though I continue, without a moment's pause, m o v i n g up a r i v e r g r e e n w i t h c r o c o d i l e s o r c o u n t i n g t h e b a r r e l s o f s a l t e d fish b e i n g l o w e r e d i n t o t h e h o l d . (103)
W i t h i n the b r o a d e r c o n t e x t o f C a l v i n o ' s poetics o f travel, the K h a n ' s f r u s t r a t e d a t t e m p t t o l i n k P o l o ' s i m a g e s w i t h h i s o w n desires suggests the possibility o f a personal, rather t h a n collective, relation between d e s i r e a n d i m a g e . I n t e r e s t i n g l y , t h e f a i l u r e o f t h e t w o t o f u s e is a m a t t e r o f t h i n g s , n o t w o r d s : " F a l s e h o o d is n e v e r i n w o r d s ; it is i n t h i n g s " (62). C a l v i n o ' s p r e o c c u p a t i o n w i t h i m a g e s ( P o l o cites a t o n e p o i n t t h e " s p e c i a l d i g n i t y o f i m a g e s " [53]) is s h a r e d b y t h e s e m i o t i c i a n R o l a n d B a r t h e s a n d his successors, T J m b e r t o E c o a n d J e a n B a u d r i l l a r d . T h e s e latter also r e c o g n i z e t h e " i m m a n e n c e o f desire i n t h e i m a g e " ( B a u d r i l l a r d 56) b u t e x p l o r e t h a t i m m a n e n c e i n t e r m s o f p u b l i c a n d c u l t u r a l , rather t h a n i n d i v i d u a l , i n v e s t m e n t . I n B a r t h e s ' s w o r k (as, later, i n E c o ' s a n d B a u d r i l l a r d ' s ) t h e images t h a t arrest t h e traveler a r e cer tainly significant, b u t they d o n o t signify outside o f the frames o f ide o l o g y a n d m y t h . A s in the images surrounding the " n e w C i t r o e n , " they l a y c l a i m t o a m y t h i c a l w o r l d t h a t exists a b o v e a n d b e y o n d n a t u r e , a w o r l d i n w h i c h " o n e c a n . . . see a t o n c e a p e r f e c t i o n a n d a n a b s e n c e o f o r i g i n , a closure a n d a brilliance, a t r a n s f o r m a t i o n o f life i n t o m a t t e r . . . a n d i n a w o r d a silence w h i c h b e l o n g s t o t h e r e a l m o f f a i r y - t a l e s " (Mythologies 88). L a t e r , i n t h e w o r k o f E c o a n d B a u d r i l l a r d , w e e n t e r the terrain o f t h e s i m u l a c r u m a n d hyperreality: a terrain in w h i c h i m a g e m a k e r s h a v e discovered the magical a r t o f s u b s u m i n g nature, a n d w h e r e " [ a j b s o l u t e u n r e a l i t y is o f f e r e d as r e a l p r e s e n c e . . . [ w i t h t h e ] sign aim[ing] t o be the thing, t o abolish the distinction o f the reference, the m e c h a n i s m o f r e p l a c e m e n t " ( E c o 7). I n L e o ' s a n d B a u d r i l l a r d ' s w o r k , t h e c u l t u r a l c r i t i c is a t r a v e l e r , e x p l o r i n g t h e c o m p l e x r e l a t i o n s b e t w e e n h i s t o r y , n a t u r e , a n d c u l t u r e at w h a t h a s b e c o m e t h e p a r a d i g 1(H)
11 M I MINI ,S W l ' l M I V I'l v v l l l l l 11
m a t i c site o f c o l l i s i o n ( a n d c o l l u s i o n ) b e t w e e n t h e R e a l a n d t h e M y t h i cal—America. E c o ' s A m e r i c a , p r e f i g u r i n g B a u d r i l l a r d ' s , is a t e r r a i n o f " f u r i o u s h y p e r r e a l i t y " (7). A m e r i c a , f o r t h e d e e p l y h u m a n i s t E c o , is a c o u n t r y w i t h o u t a sense o f h i s t o r y — i n d e e d , w i t h o u t a s e n s e o f e x p e r i e n c e . F l a u n t e d b y a horror vacui (8), t h e c o u n t r y s e e k s i n s t a n c e s o f p l e n i t u d e i n w h i c h i t m i g h t m a t e r i a l i z e , r e a l i z e , i c o n i z e everything, m a k i n g e x p e rience itself p a l p a b l e a n d c o n s u m a b l e . T h i s emptiness, t h e implicit result o f a failure t o h a r m o n i z e h i s t o r y , culture, a n d n a t u r e , m u s t b e filled e q u a l l y w i t h i c o n s o f t h e p a s t , p r e s e n t , a n d f u t u r e — W i l l i a m R a n d o l p h H e a r s t ' s "castle," the W h i t e H o u s e , C a p e K e n n e d y rockets. I n E c o ' s A m e r i c a , " k n o w l e d g e can only be iconic, a n d iconism can o n l y b e a b s o l u t e " (53). E v e n c o l l e c t i v e f a n t a s y d e m a n d s t o b e m a d e r e a l a n d palpable. D i s n e y l a n d , the p r o d u c t o f an "obsessive determination n o t t o l e a v e a s i n g l e s p a c e t h a t d o e s n ' t s u g g e s t s o m e t h i n g " ( 2 3 ) , is the (American d r e a m - f a c t o r y : a factory that totalizes " f a k e r y , " creating m o n u m e n t s o finstant nostalgia. !, I f E c o recognizes in A m e r i c a t h e universal shape o f things t o c o m e — t h e p r e e m i n e n t signs o f g l o b a l p o s t m o d e r n i t y - — - h e stops s h o r t o f saying so; rather, in juxtaposing a hyperreal " A m e r i c a " w i t h a E u r o p e t h a t h o n o r s t h e i r r e c o v e r a b l e pastness o f t h e p a s t , a n d t h a t retains the capacity t o discriminate b e t w e e n reality a n d i m i t a t i o n , h e s i t u a t e s h i s c u l t u r a l c r i t i q u e w i t h i n a set o f p r i v i l e g e d , t r a d i t i o n a l l y E u r o c e n t r i c p a r a m e t e r s . E c o ' s p r e s e n t a t i o n o f a n A m e r i c a t h a t is u b i q u i t o u s l y s i g n , f a k e , a n d f a c s i m i l e b e s t s e r v e s , p e r h a p s , as a p o l i s h e d g l o s s o n a r a s h o f m o r e o r less u n d i s t i n g u i s h e d t r a v e l b o o k s p u r v e y i n g adventures i n A m e r i c a as infernal D i s n e y w o r l d "descents." B a u d r i l l a r d ' s America ( 1 9 8 8 ) , i n c o n t r a s t , t a k i n g E c o ' s c o m m e n t a r y a s read, proceeds t o engage m o r e strenuously w i t h A m e r i c a n g e o g r a p h y , society, a n d culture. Baudrillard's A m e r i c a n j o u r n e y induces a m e t a p h o r i c a l f r e n z y , as t h e traveler-writer d e t e r m i n e d l y scans t h e l a n d s c a p e i n search o f s o m e m e t a p h y s i c a l essence. N o m a t t e r t h a t the p r o f u s i o n o f m e t a p h o r s entails t h e collapse o f m e t a p h o r , o r t h a t t h e essence t h e w r i t e r seeks t u r n s o u t t o be t h e l i m i t o f e v a c u a t i o n ; t o t h e e x t e n t t o w h i c h B a u d r i l l a r d insists, like E c o ' s A m e r i c a n s , o n r e a d i n g signs t o e x h a u s t i o n , he assimilates terrain a n d culture t o a s y m b o l i z e d state o f desire. 2
B a u d r i l l a r d ' s d e s i r e d " o i l i e r " recalls C a l v i n o ' s f a m o u s t r a v e l a p o t h e g m : " E l s e w h e r e is a n e g a t i v e m i r r o r . T h e t r a v e l e r r e c o g n i z e s t h e little t h a t is his, d i s c o v e r i n g the m u c h h e h a s n o t h a d a n d w i l l n e v e r l-i >•. 1 m i i U I I I U ' I
1I INIUI
m m 1 'I
l M
h a v e " (29). A m e r i c a is t h e n e g a t i v e m i r r o r h e r e , i n d u c i n g a " [ n ] o s t a l g i a b o r n o f t h e T e x a n h i l l s a n d t h e s i e r r a s o f N e w M e x i c o " ( B a u d r i l l a r d 1). D r a i n i n g l a n d - a n d cityscapes into abstractions o f horizontality, vertic a l i t y , a n d e m p t i n e s s , B a u d r i l l a r d c e l e b r a t e s h i s f a n t a s t i c " A m e r i c a " as a " c o l l a p s e o f m e t a p h o r " (27), e v e n a s h e s o p a t e n t l y m e t a p h o r i z e s b e y o n d t h e h o r i z o n o f B a r t h e s ' s e a r l i e r " e m p i r e o f s i g n s " (see c h a p . 2), w h i c h h a d insisted that " J a p a n " w a s a semiotics, w i t h o u t reference t o a n y " r e a l " p l a c e . B a u d r i l l a r d ' s " n o n - r e f e r e n t i a l d e s e r t " (10), l o c a t e d a t the h e a r t o f A m e r i c a , b e c o m e s " a n ecstatic critique o f culture, a n d e c s t a t i c f o r m o f d i s a p p e a r a n c e " (9). T h i s A m e r i c a is b o t h p r e - a n d p o s t c u l t u r a l , i n v o l v i n g a s it d o e s t h e virtual a b o l i t i o n o f E u r o p e ' s d i s c r i m i n a t i o n s , i r o n i e s , a n d s u b t l e t i e s . I t s v a r i o u s sites c a l l t h e v i s i t o r t o an experience b e y o n d that o fthe tourist o r holiday traveler, t o " p u r e " object-free itineraries i n t o t h e gloriously " b a n a l " z o n e s o f desert a n d m e t r o p o l i s , w h i c h a r e " n o t a t a n y s t a g e r e g a r d e d as p l a c e s o f p l e a s u r e o r c u l t u r e , b u t [ a r e ] s e e n t e l e v i s u a l l y as s c e n e r y , a s s c e n a r i o s " (9). B a u drillard's "extraterritorial" virtual scenarios, appealing t o the fantasy s c r e e n s o f " s o p h i s t i c a t e d , n u c l e a r , o r b i t a l , c o m p u t e r t e c h n o l o g y " (4), m a k e B a r t h e s ' s n o n r e f e r e n t i a l signs seem c u r i o u s l y o l d - f a s h i o n e d . B a u d r i l l a r d ' s t e x t c a n n o t h e l p b u t recall E c o ' s earlier essay o n hyperrealist A m e r i c a ; b u t B a u d r i l l a r d , u n l i k e E c o , salutes the A m e r i can processes o f t h e s i m u l a c r u m w i t h all t h e h e a d y e n t h u s i a s m o f someone greeting a m a r v e l o u s future: [ S i n c e the A m e r i c a n s ] w e r e n o t t h e first t o b e in o n h i s t o r y , t h e y w i l l b e the
first
to immortalize everything b y reconstitution
things in m u s e u m s ,
they can match
in a n i n s t a n t
the
(by
putting
fossilization
process nature t o o k millions o f years to c o m p l e t e ) . B u t the c o n c e p t i o n t h e A m e r i c a n s h a v e o f t h e m u s e u m is m u c h w i d e r t h a n o u r o w n . T o t h e m , e v e r y t h i n g is w o r t h y o f p r o t e c t i o n , e m b a l m i n g ,
restoration.
E v e r y t h i n g c a n h a v e a s e c o n d birth, the eternal birth o f the
simu
l a c r u m . (41)
A n d as f o r t h e p a s t , s o f o r t h e f u t u r e : w h e r e a s , f o r E u r o p e a n s , f i c t i o n is a m e a n s " t o a n t i c i p a t e r e a l i t y b y i m a g i n i n g i t , " f o r A m e r i c a n s it " a n t i c i p a t e s i m a g i n a t i o n b y g i v i n g i t a f o r m o f r e a l i t y " (95). A n d t h i s a n t i c i p a t o r y " f o r m o f r e a l i t y " is n o n e o t h e r t h a n t h e s i m u l a c r u m . Baudrillard endorses the transformation o f dense materiality into the s m o o t h surfaces o f the s i m u l a c r u m ; a n d yet, at the s a m e time, h e ^ m a t e r i a l i z e s t h e p h e n o m e n a o f t r a v e l i n t o a series of a b s t r a c t i o n s , s o t h a t t h e d e s e r t " a s s u m e s t h e s t a t u s o f a p r i m a l scene" (?.X); L o s A n g c -
n>.'
1 oill< 1'•• 1 •. W I I 11 i"i in W H I T M N K
les becomes "merely an inhabited fragment o f the desert" (53); speed is "simply the rite that initiates us into emptiness" (7); and change embodies "the aesthetic form o f a mutation" (23). F o r the E u r o p e a n traveler, the experience o f travel through A m e r i c a becomes a glimpse in C a l v i n o ' s "negative mirror": T h i s is o n e o f t h e a d v a n t a g e s , o n e o f t h e p l e a s u r e s o f t r a v e l . T o see a n d feel A m e r i c a , y o u h a v e t o h a v e h a d f o r a t least o n e m o m e n t i n some d o w n t o w n jungle, in the Painted Desert, o r o n some bend in a f r e e w a y , t h e f e e l i n g t h a t E u r o p e h a s d i s a p p e a r e d . (104-5)
Nonetheless, it is Europe (though less obviously than in E c o ' s essay) that continues to haunt the nexus o f political, historical, cultural, and geographical affairs to which Baudrillard attaches the label " A m e r ica." A n d w h a t is more, the very c o m m e n t a t o r w h o had seemed to abolish metaphor and m y t h from the travel b o o k has ended u p smug gling it in—and not so surreptitiously—by the b a c k door. In Baudrillard's text, the experience o f travel in A m e r i c a is con verted into surface, or—to be willfully, if appropriately, p a r a d o x i c a l — into the essence o f surface. Recalling "the immensity o f the T e x a n hills and the sierras o f N e w M e x i c o , " Baudrillard insists that photographs cannot, will not, recreate the experience: W e ' d n e e d t h e w h o l e film o f t h e trip in real time, including t h e u n b e a r a b l e h e a t a n d the m u s i c . W e ' d h a v e t o r e p l a y it all f r o m e n d t o e n d at h o m e i n a d a r k e n e d r o o m , rediscover t h e m a g i c o f the free w a y s a n d the distance a n d t h e ice-cold alcohol i n the desert a n d t h e s p e e d a n d live it all a g a i n o n v i d e o a t h o m e i n real t i m e , n o t s i m p l y f o r the pleasure o f r e m e m b e r i n g b u t because the fascination o f sense less r e p e t i t i o n is a l r e a d y p r e s e n t i n t h e a b s t r a c t i o n o f t h e j o u r n e y . (1)
" R e a l time" is, o f course, reel time or, perhaps better, an a p p r o x i m a tion o f it, since Baudrillard's virtual travel depends on the "futurist" technologies o f the shallow surface: the video screen and the computer monitor. T h e drained landscapes o f A m e r i c a find their mirror in the reduplicative surfaces o f simulation technology. V i r t u a l travel, as experienced on the video screen, promises an "interactive" experience that m a k e s simulation m o r e real than actuality. A s Baudrillard implies, it is the very abstractness o f the surface that enables such sat isfying travel. In the viewer's " d a r k e n e d r o o m , " the combination o f visual and aural effects melds i n l o a l o l a l but absolutely abstracted and thus perhaps essential experience, al the same time as the
i'US'1 M O l l l u i '
i
1 1 • ' 11 • M A M 1 « '
i'i
I
"futurist" technologies o f fast-forwarding a n d hypertextuality evoke an instant nostalgia. A s w i t h other aspects o f a c o m m o d i f i e d c o n t e m p o r a r y m e t r o p o l i t a n l i f e s t y l e — f o o d a n d sex b e i n g t w o o b v i o u s c o m m o d i t i e s — v i r t u a l technologies hold out the promise o f participatory, interactive experi ence. B u t such experience a m o u n t s , in E c o ' s terms, t o a n o t h e r f o r m o f " f a k e r y " ; t h e i n t e r a c t i o n it p r o d u c e s is w i t h a v a r i e t y o f s u r f a c e s — s u r faces t h a t o v e r l a y t h e subject i n a u n i f o r m , a b s t r a c t b l a n k e t i n g . T h i s "travel o f the f u t u r e " precludes travel f r o m t h e outset; u b i q u i t o u s instantaneity converts labored m o v e m e n t into abstract patterns o f "senseless r e p e t i t i o n . " V i r t u a l t r a v e l is t h e l a t e s t l i n k i n a c h a i n t h a t r u n s f r o m t h e t r a v e l b o o k t h r o u g h t h e t r a v e l g u i d e , film, a n d v i d e o , ft is t e m p t i n g , a g a i n , t o i n v o k e nostalgia: lament for the progressive evacuation o f " r e a l " expe r i e n c e f r o m t r a v e l . B u t " t r a v e l , " i n w h i c h e v e r f o r m it is m e d i a t e d , is a l w a y s t e x t u a l a n d s u p p l e m e n t a r y ; it r e s p o n d s t o p e r s o n a l a n d c o l l e c tive m a n d a t e s that a r e necessarily o v e r d e t e r m i n e d . C o m p l e x tracts, these m a n d a t e s seek t o s u p e r i m p o s e o n e g r i d o r a n o t h e r o n a n e x p e r i ence ( o f travel, o f the w o r l d , etc.) t h a t r e m a i n s irreducible. T h i s s t u d y h a s a l r e a d y d i s c u s s e d P i c o I y e r ' s " g r i d , " i n Video Night in Kalhmandu (1988), a s a p o s t c o l o n i a l r e s p o n s e t o A s i a ' s e n t r y i n t o a " g l o b a l c u l t u r e " (see c h a p . 1). B u t Video Night is, e q u a l l y , a n o f f - t h e s h e l f p o s t m o d e r n i s t r e s p o n s e : i n its s t r e t c h e d c o m p a r i s o n s , its s t a r t l i n g p a r a l l e l s , a n d its s e l f - c o n s c i o u s l y i n g e n i o u s t e x t u a l e f f e c t s . I y e r s p r i n k l e s h i s e s s a y s w i t h r e f e r e n c e s t o l e a d i n g t h e o r e t i c a l figures ( B a r t h e s , M c L u h a n , etc.), a l o n g w i t h n u m e r o u s p o p - c u l t u r e allusions, designed t o a s s u r e h i s r e a d e r s t h a t h e is m o v i n g a r o u n d i n t h e a g e o f g l o b a l c u l t u r e w i t h e a s y a u t h o r i t y . I y e r ' s " v i d e o n i g h t " is h y p e r r e a l i s m a t l o w t e m p e r a t u r e . W e n e e d t o a s k w h a t specific c o m m e n t a r y — a b o u t m o b i l ity, c u l t u r a l representation, a n d m y t h — I y e r ' s supple t o u r p r o v i d e s . I y e r ' s b o o k offers s o m e t h i n g o f a thesis a b o u t l a t e - t w e n t i e t h - c e n tury capitalism—a phase in w h i c h the older f o r m s o f imperial conquest have given w a y t o a " n e w i n v a s i o n " b y tourists, the latter-day "terror ists o f c u l t u r a l e x p a n s i o n i s m " (13). B u t t h i s thesis is r e a l l y n o m o r e t h a n a n enabling f r a m e w o r k : a space w i t h i n w h i c h Iyer can operate relays o f incongruities. T h i s A s i a , ironically recolonized in free-floating p o s t m o d e r n i s t f a s h i o n , is a l a n d o f s u r f a c e s t h a t I y e r c o m p o s e s a c c o r d ing t o the " l a w s " o f pastiche, collage, the crazy quill. K a t h m a n d u strikes I y e r , f o r e x a m p l e , as " e x a c t l y t h e k i n d o f cross-cultural cross r o a d s ' * h e h a d h o p e d t o f i n d (94); yet a l t h o u g h this s i t u a t i o n i n v i t e s lf»i|
T O O M I S T S W i l l i 'I VIM: w i l l T h l t N
d e f i n i t i o n a n d a n a l y s i s , it is less c o m p e l l i n g t o I y e r t h a n a r e its s u r f a c e incongruities. T h e s e I y e r describes in a flippant l o n e o f c o m i c h o r r o r , as t i m e a n d a g a i n h e finds h i m s e l f f a l l i n g " l i k e A l i c e t h r o u g h t h e l o o k i n g g l a s s " i n t o " u p s i d e d o w n w o r l d s " (78). A t o n e m o m e n t , h e d i s c o v ers t h a t h e h a s " t r a v e l e d 8,000 m i l e s o n l y t o e n d u p . . . i n a f a c s i m i l e o f t h e E a s t v i l l a g e " (103); a t a n o t h e r , W e s t e r n v i s i t o r s t o B a l i — " b e e f y m e n w i t h sunglasses p r o p p e d u p in their h a i r " a n d "freshly t u r n e d blondes in halter tops and miniskirts"—have transformed K u t a Beach i n t o " t h e p o o r m a n ' s C l u b M e d " (47); a t still a n o t h e r , B a l i n e s e sales assistants, " n o w s p o r t [ i n g ] tight j e a n s a n d sun-glasses . . . h a d scarlet h e a d b a n d s a b o v e their m a s c a r a e d eyes . . . [and] w o r e T - s h i r t s t h a t said ' p r o u d l y A u s t r a l i a n ' a c r o s s t h e i r c h e s t s " (68). Video Night is, t o b e s u r e , a n a t t r a c t i v e a n d s u p e r i o r t r a v e l b o o k . Well informed (to thepoint o f sometimes appearing too k n o w i n g , t o o u p - t o - t h e - m i n u t e ) a n d s t y l i s h l y w r i t t e n , it n e v e r t h e l e s s b e g s s e v e r a l questions that readers m i g h t well w a n t t o a s k a b o u t t h e " n o t - s o - f a r E a s t " as a conjunction o f postcolonialism w i t h p o s t m o d e r n i s m . T h e m o s t o b v i o u s q u e s t i o n h e r e is: h o w d o t h e s e t w o " p o s t s " r e l a t e t o o n e another? Tyer's response typically vacillates b e t w e e n w o n d e r m e n t a n d controlled nostalgia: h e marvels, f o r e x a m p l e , at the Japanese a p p r o p r i a t i o n o f b a s e b a l l b u t insists, a t t h e s a m e t i m e , t h a t J a p a n h a s n o t s u c c e e d e d i n m a k i n g t h e s p o r t f u l l y its o w n , i n d i c a t i n g a w i s t f u l p r e f e r ence f o r e x h i b i t i o n s o f m o r e " d i s t i n c t i v e " J a p a n e s e social codes. A r a t h e r less o b v i o u s q u e s t i o n ( i f t h e first o n e p r o v e s u l t i m a t e l y u n a n s w e r a b l e ) is: w h a t k i n d o f a n a l y s i s m i g h t t h e t r a v e l b o o k o f f e r t h a t w o u l d e x e m p t a u t h o r a n d reader f r o m t h e charge o f b a d faith? Iyer seems a t his m o s t v u l n e r a b l e w h e n h e targets " o v e r l a n d e r s " - t h o s e ubiquitous hordes o f global b a c k p a c k e r s toting their L o n e l y P l a n e t g u i d e b o o k s — a s a tribe o f "counter-cultural imperialists that w a n d e r s t h e p l a n e t i n s e a r c h o f c u t - r a t e p a r a d i s e s " (78). I n t h e A s i a n " o u t b a c k , " travelers like these h a v e t o " t u r n themselves into locals" t o sur vive, eating cheaply a n d locally, w a s h i n g clothes in streams, a n d a d o p t ing t h e locals' dress styles. A n d y e t , s i m u l t a n e o u s l y , these travelers " w e r e f o r c i n g [places like] L h a s a t o t u r n [themselves] i n t o a r o u g h v e r s i o n o f t h e h o m e s t h e y h a d q u i t " (81). I y e r , it b e a r s r e m e m b e r i n g , u n d e r t o o k h i s t r i p u n d e r t h e s p o n s o r s h i p o f Time: a g l o b a l m a g a z i n e pur excellence. L o n g - h a u l b a c k p a c k e r s ; s h o r t - t e r m visitors o n p a c k a g e tours; peripatetic E n g l i s h - l a n g u a g e teachers; international business t r a v e l e r s ; a n d , n o t least, I y e r a n d his r e a d e r s : all o f t h e s e g r o u p s a r e i n t e r e s t e d , n o t t o m e n t i o n i m p l i c a t e d , in b o t h t h e p r e s e r v a t i o n o f t h e
( • O N T M r i W . K N I T I N t. IIA II11
165
E a s t a s a site o f c u l t u r a l d i f f e r e n c e a n d its p r o p u l s i o n i n t o a w o r l d t h e m e - p a r k , a g l o b a l v i s i t o r - f r i e n d l y a r e n a . A n d i r o n i c a l l y , it is t h i s l a t t e r d e v e l o p m e n t t h a t k e e p s t h e a d r e n a l i n e o f n o s t a l g i a flowing; I y e r , a f t e r all, is v e r y m u c h p a r t o f t h e p r o c e s s t h a t p r o d u c e s r e g r e t t h a t " t h e r e a l B a l i n e s e smiles s e e m e d t o b e f a d i n g " (68). Iyer invokes techniques o f identification a n d reduction that are related t o those o f , say, Baudrillard (likening exotic K u t a t o " D u v a l S t r e e t i n K e y W e s t o n a S a t u r d a y n i g h t " [47]), b u t h e s t o p s j u s t s h o r t o f collapsing layered actuality into virtual representation b y t a k i n g care t o discriminate b e t w e e n surfaces a n d depths: " T h e w h i r l i n g surfaces [of K a t h m a n d u ] existed, n o d o u b t , but they seemed to be n o m o r e t h a n s u r f a c e s " (105). H i s r e p r o a c h s e e m s less d i r e c t e d t o w a r d t h e O r i e n t ' s " p r o v i s i o n o f a l l t h e latest i n p o s t - p o s t - M o d e r n i s t c h i c " t o A m e r i c a t h a n t o w a r d its c o n s p i c u o u s ( a n d c o n s p i c u o u s l y l a t e ) c o n s u m p t i o n o f its o w n e l e c t r o n i c p r o d u c t s (105). O n a n o t h e r level, Iyer's descriptions lead b a c k t o C a l v i n o a n d his r e v i s i t a t i o n o f M a r c o P o l o ' s t r a v e l s . S o m a n y o f C a l v i n o ' s cities split, e n g e n d e r i n g r e f l e c t i v e o r r e v e r s e d d o u b l e s , t h a t t h e c i t y b e c o m e s a mise en abyme, t h a t f a v o r i t e a m o n g c o n t e m p o r a r y t e x t u a l effects o f d e s t a b i lization. " [ A ] s each o f t h e three tourist havens h a d g r o w n m o r e bloated," Iyer comments about Bali, "each o f them h a d spawned a k i n d o f s h a d o w self, a n a n n e x - t o w n t h a t h a d m a t e r i a l i z e d b y its side t o c a t e r t o t h e o v e r f l o w " (53). I y e r ' s b o o k , i n f a c t , r e f e r e n c e s p o s t m o d e r n w r i t i n g p r a c t i c e m u c h less i n its d e s c r i p t i o n s o f c r a z y - q u i l t s u r f a c e s t h a n i n t h o s e m o m e n t s o f a b s t r a c t f o r m u l a t i o n w h e n it r e a d s l i k e a p a r ody o fCalvino: E v e r y t h i n g , in f a c t , a p p r o x i m a t e d t o its P l a t o n i c i m a g e : e v e r y Z e n garden w a s a picture-perfect i m a g e o f w h a t a Z e n g a r d e n should be; the E m p e r o r disappeared within the idealized role o f an
Emperor;
and every geisha c o r r e s p o n d e d exactly to the proto-typical m o d e l o f a geisha (a T o k y o rose w a s a T o k y o rose w a s a T o k y o rose).
(386)
E n c o u n t e r i n g this k i n d o f d i s t a n c e d c o m m e n t a r y , readers m i g h t well b e d r a w n t o reflect o n t h o s e p a s s a g e s o f a c t u a l t r a v e l w h e r e t h e u n f a m i l i a r v i l l a g e , t o w n , o r c i t y a w a k e n s n o t s o m u c h a sense o f m a t e r i a l e s t r a n g e m e n t as o n e o f m e t a p h y s i c a l d i s - e a s e . F o r a l l its v i v i d c e l e b r a t i o n o f p a r a d o x a n d h y b r i d i t y i n t h e e n c o u n t e r o f E a s t a n d W e s t , Video Night, c o m m u n i c a t e s a s t r o n g sense o f w h a t Iain C h a m b e r s has called the " E u r o c e n t r i c domestication o f s p a c e " (31). I y e r ' s d e s t i n a t i o n s f e a t u r e as d i v i s i b l e " c h a p t e r s o f t r a v e l 1 1
l<»6
loUHFi I
WIIII
1 \ i-i'Wi'i 1 1 I'',
and experience, as well as neatly separated sections in his b o o k . E a c h is discursively contained and discriminated, either by a leading idea, a set of images, or an intertextual frame; there are few signs here that the traveler-writer has found himself—and his sense o f self—unsettled by incongruities o f place, culture, or situation. S o far this section has dis cussed some o f the ways in which travel writing configures space— cities, deserts, countries—while examining briefly a few more or less postmodernist effects o f spatial representation. B u t postmodernist inflection is also relevant to the traveling and writing subject. F o r if travelers are dependent on a sense o f stable identity from which to experience and interpret difference, they also tend to claim another, rather special identity as travelers: one that is experientially open and interpretively flexible, generous. Chambers has described postmodern, metropolitan travel as experience o f the dislocation of the intellectual subject and his—the gender is delib erate—mastery of the word/world. The illusions of identity organised around the privileged voice and stable subjectivity of the "external" observer are swept up and broken down into a movement that no longer permits the obvious institution of self-identity between thought and reality. In this disjunctive moment, the object of the intellectual gaze—the cultures and habits of the "natives" of local, national and global "territories"—can no longer be confined to an obvious chart or map, and there freeze-dried as a fixed or essential component of knowledge. (95) The traveler w h o can recognize and confront such a "disjunctive moment," while leaving the objects o f his/her gaze "unconfined," m a y well be something o f an ideal. It is at this point, where the need to con struct a " g o o d " traveler as against the " b a d " tourist figure again comes to the forefront, that the nomad has proven to be a useful rhetorical device. Bruce C h a t w i n , something o f a cult figure in the travel-writing industry, has been instrumental in making the nomad available as an ideal version o f the modern traveler. C h a t w i n ' s theories on nomadism are articulated most conspicuously in his celebrated The
Songlines
(1987), but they can also be found in some o f his shorter essays in the posthumously published collections What Am I Doing Here (1990) and Anatomy of Restlessness
(1996). C h a t w i n at one stage planned a b o o k
on nomadism, but the outline that he wrote for it (excerpted in Anatomy)
is rather puzzling. Puzzling, because nomadism emerges
bolh as a universalized yearning and as a number o f specific ways o f
I" 1; 1 M n i U ' M N II INIIUAM.ItIS
H'7
life t h a t a r e c o n s t r a i n e d b y t i m e a n d p l a c e . " E v o l u t i o n i n t e n d e d u s t o be travellers," claims C h a t w i n : " O u r m a d obsession w i t h technological p r o g r e s s is a r e s p o n s e t o b a r r i e r s i n t h e w a y o f g e o g r a p h i c a l p r o g r e s s " (Anatomy T 0 2 ) . W h a t e v e r e v o l u t i o n m a y h a v e i n t e n d e d , n o m a d s first d e n o t e h e r d s m e n , then later h u n t s m e n , w h o "shift f o r e c o n o m i c rea s o n s " (76). B u t n o m a d s , a c c o r d i n g t o C h a t w i n , a r e " i n t r a n s i g e n t ] i n face o f settlement"; t h e y are d r a w n t o w a n d e r e v e n w h e n it m a k e s eco n o m i c sense t o s t a y p u t , a n d as a r e s u l t a " m u t u a l a n t a g o n i s m " h a s g r a d u a l l y e v o l v e d b e t w e e n " c i t i z e n a n d n o m a d " (76). A t a m u c h l o o s e r r e m o v e , " t h e n o m a d " b e c o m e s a g e n e r a l i z e d figure o f restlessness a n d escapism, o r a semi-ironic m e t a p h o r f o r the itinerant storyteller—"a s u p e r f l u o u s p e r s o n s u c h as m y s e l f " — f o r w h o m n o m a d i c w a n d e r i n g is a l s o a n a n a l o g u e f o r t h e " s t r i n g i n g t o g e t h e r " o f t r a v e l e r s ' tales (14). C h a t w i n poses a link, then, between the m o d e r n n o m a d i c r o m a n c e a n d travel writing, in the "stringing together" o f glittering kernels o f travel experience i n t o a r t f u l w h o l e s . T h e s e assemblages a r e strategic; f o r C h a t w i n - a s - n o m a d is a figure t h a t is c o n s t r u c t e d r e t r o s p e c t i v e l y , p r o v i d i n g a n alibi f o r his p a r t i c u l a r t r a v e l - w r i t i n g enterprise. O n t h e face o f it, C h a t w i n ' s w r i t i n g d o e s n o t l o o k p a r t i c u l a r l y p o s t m o d e r n . H i s v e r y f o r m e d a n d E u r o c e n t r i c sense o f s t y l e — o f t h e sparkling object i n the antique s h o w r o o m o r f r o m some cabinet o f c u r i o s i t i e s — p l a c e s h i m r a t h e r firmly w i t h i n a t r a d i t i o n o f E n g l i s h c o l l e c t i o n a n d c o n n o i s s e u r s h i p . 3 H e is a w a r e o f t h e e a r l y s t i r r i n g s o f p o s t m o d e r n i s t t h e o r y i n t h e w o r k o f M a r s h a l l M c L u h a n , w h o m h e sees as a r g u i n g t h a t " l i t e r a c y , t h e l i n c h - p i n o f C i v i l i s a t i o n is O U T ; t h a t elec t r o n i c t e c h n o l o g y is b y - p a s s i n g t h e ' r a t i o n a l p r o c e s s e s o f l e a r n i n g ' a n d t h a t j o b s a n d specialists a r e t h i n g s o f t h e p a s t " (Anatomy 84). H e h a s reservations, t h o u g h , a b o u t M c L u h a n ' s endorsement o f a " n e w Inter n a t i o n a l i s m , " i n w h i c h " [ m ] u c h o f t h e w o r l d ' s p o p u l a t i o n is o n t h e m o v e as n e v e r b e f o r e " (84). C u r i o u s l y , h e a s s o c i a t e s M c L u h a n ' s "global village" w i t h parochialism a n d separatism; certainly, he recog n i z e s t h e d a n g e r s i n e s p o u s i n g n o m a d i s m as a u n i v e r s a l p r o g r a m — o n e o f t h e s e b e i n g t h a t " t h e n o m a d " is r o b b e d o f s p e c i a l m o t i v a t i o n , a n d o f e f f e c t i v e n e s s as a s e r v i c e a b l e a l i b i f o r t h e t r a v e l w r i t e r . C h a t w i n ' s stylistic a n d descriptive gifts are certainly v e r y s t r o n g ; a n d y e t t h e r e is s o m e t h i n g i n excess o f t h e s e gifts t h a t h a s p r o d u c e d t h e " s p e c i a l " a p p e a l o f C h a t w i n — a n d t h a t s o m e t h i n g , as V e r o n i c a H o r well has suggested, has m u c h t o d o w i t h the allure o f the n o m a d - i n d i v i d u a l i s t : " T h i s is C h a t w i n the b l o n d l l i r l . . . . t o s s i n g his b o o t s b y t h e i r laces o v e r his s h o u l d e r a n d l o o k i n g b a c k , u s i n g t r a v e l a s a c o m e - o n . |()K
niMUNTN Willi
I V I ' M W U I I IIt S
D o y o u want me? O r do y o u want to be me?" (28). This airy sketch o f the unfettered, venturesome, and freewheeling individual suggests w h y there is always likely to be a gap between "cultural" theories o f the nomad and envisionings o f nomadism as a pretext for personal— romantic—flight.
4
In Chatwin's work, nomadism is different again
from either o f these theories; it is tantamount to a highly idiosyncratic personal mythology, relying on a potpourri o f materials that C h a t w i n , as determined bricoleur, can seize upon and utilize at will. It is in The Songlines
that C h a t w i n deploys his talents as a
bricoleur most ambitiously; for it is there that his gifts as a travel writer, combined with those o f the amateur ethnologist and cultural historian, find their ideal subject in the Aborigines o f Australia, an extant instance o f nomadism. Iain Chambers, w h o in passing cites "[fjhe Nietzschean vision o f the w o r l d " suggested "in Bruce C h a t w i n ' s marvellous b o o k The Songlines"
(53), conflates nomads with contem
porary "migrants." " M i g r a n c y , " in Chambers's theory, becomes a defining characteristic of social life in a "new," increasingly globalized, postmodern culture: It is the dispersal attendant on m i g r a n c y that disrupts and interro gates the o v e r a r c h i n g themes o f modernity: the nation and its litera ture, l a n g u a g e and sense o f identity; the metropolis, the sense o f cen tre, the sense o f psychic a n d cultural h o m o g e n e i t y . In the recognition of the pther, o f radical alterity, lies the a c k n o w l e d g m e n t that w e [Europeans] are no longer at the centre o f the w o r l d . O u r sense o f centre and being is displaced. A s historical, cultural and psychic sub jects w e , too, are uprooted, forced to reply to our existence in terms of m o v e m e n t and m e t a m o r p h o s i s . (23-24)
For Chambers, the sense o f migrancy, " o f living between worlds, between a lost past and a non-integrated present, is perhaps the most fitting metaphor o f this (post)modern condition" (27). The ( p o s t m o d ern sense o f cities, in turn, is that they are "both real and invisible, to echo Italo Calvino: places whose symbolic and real alterity provide another chance, a further question, another opening" (28). Even in the metropolis, "we, too, become nomads, migrating across a system that is too vast to be our own, but in which w e are fully involved—translat ing and transforming what w e find and absorb into local instances o f sense" (14). Chambers's object
is to open up the condition
o f migrant
(post)modernity, to make it serve as an imaginary site for the exercise of
greater
cross-cultural
understanding
and
I ' O M ' M M I H U N ITINI'MAHII'.N
freedom. 169
Chambers
a c k n o w l e d g e s t h e d a n g e r i n d o m e s t i c a t i n g " p o e t i c figures o f t r a v e l a n d e x i l e " (6), a n d h e is w e l l a w a r e t h a t c o n t e m p o r a r y m i g r a n c y is m o r e o f t e n a m a t t e r o f b r u t e necessity t h a n c o s m o p o l i t a n privilege. I t p r o v e s d i f f i c u l t , n o n e t h e l e s s , not t o c e l e b r a t e , i n t e r m s r e m i n i s c e n t o f C h a t w i n ' s " N i e t z s c h e a n vision o f the w o r l d , " the h u m a n
adventure in w h i c h the m o v e m e n t s o f peoples, and
the
r i g o u r s a n d r h y t h m s o f b o d i e s , l i m b s a n d v o i c e , set the patterns,
the
d e s i g n , the n o m i n a t i o n , o f the land, o u r c o u n t r y , o u r h o m e . T h e reli g i o u s a u r a o f this n o m a d i s m h a s clearly w a n e d in the m o r e
secular
n e t w o r k s o f W e s t e r n s o c i e t y . P e r h a p s it still c o n t i n u e s t o e c h o i n s i d e the
miniaturised
headphones
of
modern
nomads
as
the
barely
r e m e m b e r e d t r a c e s o f a o n c e s a c r e d j o u r n e y intent o n c e l e b r a t i n g its p r e s e n c e in a m a r k , v o i c e , s i g n , s y m b o l , s i g n a t u r e , t o b e left a l o n g the t r a c k . (53)
In such h e a d y evocations o f C h a t w i n ' s general meditations o n travel, as w e l l a s i n m o r e specific c o m m e n t a r i e s — o b v i o u s l y i n d e b t e d t o Jacques D e r r i d a ' s account o f the " t r a c e " — o n the songlines o f the A u s tralian A b o r i g i n e s , C h a m b e r s veers a w a y f r o m t h e o r i z i n g a p o s t m o d ern/postcolonial cultural condition, seeming intent instead o n e x t r a p o lating a poetics—even a m e t a p h y s i c s — o f travel. I n the process, C h a m b e r s quotes at length f r o m the w o r k o f P a u l C a r t e r : a n A u s t r a l i a n theorist o f space, place, a n d travel w h o has m o r e c o g e n t l y a r g u e d t h e i m p l i c a t i o n s o f n o m a d i s m a n d m i g r a n c y . I n Living in a New Country ( 1 9 9 2 ) , C a r t e r s p e c u l a t e s , An
authentically migrant perspective would, perhaps, be based on an
i n t u i t i o n t h a t t h e o p p o s i t i o n b e t w e e n h e r e a n d t h e r e is i t s e l f a c u l t u r a l c o n s t r u c t i o n , a c o n s e q u e n c e o f t h i n k i n g i n t e r m s o f fixed e n t i t i e s a n d d e f i n i n g t h e m o p p o s i t i o n a l l y . It m i g h t b e g i n b y r e g a r d i n g m o v e m e n t , n o t as a n a w k w a r d interval b e t w e e n fixed p o i n t s o f d e p a r t u r e
and
arrival, b u t as a m o d e o f b e i n g in the w o r l d . T h e q u e s t i o n w o u l d be, then, not h o w to arrive, but b o w to m o v e , h o w to identify convergent a n d divergent m o v e m e n t s ; a n d the c h a l l e n g e w o u l d be h o w to
notate
s u c h e v e n t s , h o w t o g i v e t h e m a h i s t o r i c a l a n d s o c i a l v a l u e . (101)
N o m a d i s m , w h e t h e r it t a k e s t h e f o r m o f C h a t w i n ' s elite r o m a n c e o r o f C h a m b e r s ' s u n c r i t i c a l t h e o r i z i n g , fails t o g i v e a s a t i s f a c t o r y a c c o u n t o f m o v e m e n t as a p r o b l e m a t i c . H o w t o m o v e , a n d w h y ; h o w t o identify m o v e m e n t s ; h o w t o n o t a t e these m o v e m e n t s , g i v i n g t h e m h i s t o r i c a l a n d s o c i a l v a l u e : a l l o f t h e s e q u e s t i o n s a r e b r o a c h e d in a r e m a r k a b l e recent t r a v e l b o o k b y a n o t h e r A u s t r a l i a n w r i t e r , t h e Night Letters o f R o b e r t D c s s u i x ( 1 9 9 6 ) . Night Letters is a n e x o r c i s e in p o s t 1/ u
lunuiN'r.s u 1 1 1 1 i ! 1 ' i ' W n r r w i i N
m o d e r n i s t m e t a n a r r a t i v e : t h e t r a v e l b o o k p o s i n g a s fiction, o r fiction p o s i n g as t h e t r a v e l b o o k . T h e a n o n y m o u s first-person t r a v e l e r - n a r r a t o r o f Night Letters, l i k e s e v e r a l o t h e r " e n d o f t r a v e l " w r i t e r s a l r e a d y e n c o u n t e r e d i n t h i s s t u d y , r e g r e t s t h a t " t r a v e l i n t h e o l d sense [is] n o w out o f the question—travelling t o w h e t y o u r appetite, t o pique y o u r h u n g e r , n o t t o s a t i s f y i t " (214). M o d e r n t r a v e l , f o r D e s s a i x ' s n a r r a t o r , is " [ f j u l l o f m o v e m e n t b u t n o t h i n g a c t u a l l y happens. I ' m b e g i n n i n g t o h a n k e r f o r t r a v e l o f a d i f f e r e n t k i n d " (191). A n d it is t r a v e l " o f a d i f f e r ent k i n d " that D e s s a i x in fact produces t h r o u g h o u t t h e t h o u g h t f u l pages o f his fiction/travel b o o k . T h e m a j o r p o s t m o d e r n i s t s t r a t e g y o n h a n d i n t h e Night Letters is the d e s t a b i l i z a t i o n o f t h e w o r k ' s t e x t u a l / g e n e r i c s t a t u s . S u b t i t l e d " A J o u r n e y t h r o u g h S w i t z e r l a n d a n d I t a l y , " t h e w o r k is " b y " R o b e r t D e s s a i x ; b u t it is " [ e ] d i t e d b y I g o r M i a z m o v , " w h o r e c o r d s i n a p r e f a t o r y n o t e t h a t " t h e s e letters ( i f t h a t is i n d e e d w h a t t h e d o c u m e n t s a r e ) w e r e w r i t t e n i n a first-floor r o o m i n t h e H o t e l A r c a d i a i n V e n i c e t o a c o r r e s p o n d e n t [ w h o remains a n o n y m o u s ] in M e l b o u r n e . " A l t h o u g h the "let t e r s " w e r e all o r i g i n a l l y c o m p o s e d i n V e n i c e , M i a z m o v h a s g r o u p e d t h e m u n d e r t h e h e a d i n g s " L o c a r n o , " " V i c e n z a , " a n d " P a d u a , " since " t h e reflections c o n t a i n e d i n t h e m a p p e a r t o arise q u i t e specifically f r o m the a u t h o r ' s b r i e f s o j o u r n i n e a c h o f these three cities." M i a z m o v has h e a v i l y e d i t e d this c o r r e s p o n d e n c e ; a n d i n w h a t l o o k s like a n i r o n i c sideswipe at certain kinds o f detail-conscious travel b o o k s , h e reveals his e d i t o r i a l p r a c t i c e : S o m e p a s s a g e s o f a deeply personal nature, as well as references to matters
of no
c o n c e i v a b l e interest
to
anybody
apart
from
close
acquaintances (details o f m e n u s a n d r a i l w a y timetables, complaints a b o u t the w e a t h e r a n d the rates o f e x c h a n g e , a m o r o u s encounters and the like) h a v e b e e n o m i t t e d f r o m this e d i t e d version. (Preface, n.p.)
A u g m e n t i n g the already highly m e d i a t e d character o f the w o r k . M i a z m o v g o e s o n t o p r o v i d e a series o f n o t e s a n d r e f e r e n c e s t o t h e l e t t e r s — notes that are often critical, directly o r indirectly, o f their writer. I t is h a r d t o i m a g i n e a m o r e m e d i a t e d t r a v e l a c c o u n t : " l e t t e r s " t h a t arc n o t necessarily letters; a n o n y m o u s d i s p a t c h e r a n d r e v i e w e r ; a b r e a k b e t w e e n t h e sites w h e r e t h e d i s c o u r s e ( o f t r a v e l ) is g e n e r a t e d a n d where the "letters" were written; and the intervention o f an editor— himself suspiciously fictional w h o has r e m o v e d a great deal o f t h e r a w m a t e r i a l f r o m the travel a c c o u n t , a n d w h o has also " [ s t a n d a r d i z e d ] t h e L n g l i s h in t h e r e p o r t e d s p e e c h o f c e r t a i n I t a l i a n s a n d G e r m a n s t h e I'OfilTMi ' U i 1 1 I I INHH A 1 1 1 1 , ' ,
I 71
a u t h o r e n c o u n t e r e d " ( p r e f a c e , n . p . ) . T h i s is c l e a r l y a b o o k , t h e n , t h a t f o r e g r o u n d s its o w n t e x t u a l p a c k a g i n g , i n s i s t i n g t h a t t h e r e a d e r is a t several r e m o v e s f r o m i m m e d i a t e , " a u t h e n t i c " t r a v e l — t h e possibility o f which, nonetheless, animates m u c h o fthe b o o k ' s discussion. " I l l n e s s is t h e n i g h t - s i d e o f l i f e " : S u s a n S o n t a g ' s p o i g n a n t m e t a p h o r , w h i c h s e e m s s u g g e s t i v e o f D e s s a i x ' s t i t l e , o b l i q u e l y raises t h e issue o f m o t i v a t i o n t h a t o c c u p i e s t h e b o o k ' s o p e n i n g p a g e s . F o r t h e l e t t e r w r i t e r is i m p e l l e d o n his I t a l i a n j o u r n e y b y t h e d o c t o r ' s r e v e l a t i o n t h a t h i s p a t i e n t is H I V - p o s i t i v e a n d l i k e l y s u f f e r i n g w i t h t h e A I D S v i r u s . T h e w r i t e r ' s e n s u i n g q u e s t is u n c o n c e r n e d , h o w e v e r , a b o u t s e a r c h i n g f o r a c u r e o r e v a d i n g t h e d i s e a s e ; r a t h e r , w h a t is a t s t a k e is experiential, traveling inquiry: finding o u t w h a t living in the w o r l d entails, w h a t m a k e s f o r " g e n u i n e " travel. A n d the risk o f a p r e m a t u r e d e a t h m e r e l y raises t h e s t a k e s , m a k i n g t h e t r a v e l e r - w r i t e r ' s i n q u i r i e s that m u c h m o r e vital, that m u c h m o r e urgent. 5
A t o n e m o m e n t , w a t c h i n g p a s s e r s b y o n t h e street, t h e t r a v e l e r is s t r u c k t h a t " t h e y a l l t h o u g h t t h e y w e r e going s o m e w h e r e , t h e y w e r e a l l facing the front" (10). L a t e r , i n P a d u a , h e d i s c o v e r s " s o m e t h i n g s u s p i ciously religious. . . a b o u t m o d e r n t o u r i s m " : At
least w h e n y o u t r a v e l a l o n e t h e t e m p t a t i o n t o t i c k t h i n g s o f f is
w e a k e n e d . . . . Y o u ' r e less l i k e l y t o g i v e in t o the n a r k y little v o i c e telling y o u y o u
should
see St A n t h o n y ' s t o m b , y o u
" r e m a r k a b l e loggias of the L a w C o u r t s " (why?), y o u
must l o o k a t t h e ought a t l e a s t t o
l o o k i n o n St G e o r g e ' s O r a t o r y . W h y s h o u l d 1? y o u c a n s a y t o y o u r self. I n t h e i n f i n i t u d e
o f t h e c o s m o s w h a t d i f f e r e n c e w i l l it
make
w h e t h e r I d o or I don't? I like sitting here, just l o o k i n g at the red-tiled r o o f s a n d t h e t i n t e d , b u t t r e s s e d h a i r . I'll j u s t sit.
(215)
I f this attitude seems t o c o n v e y a m o d e s t l y hedonistic y e a r n i n g f o r free d o m , i t is d i s t i n c t f r o m t h e f r e e d o m a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e c o n t e m p o r a r y n o m a d . I t is t h e a t t i t u d e , r a t h e r , o f a c e r t a i n s t a t e o f d e s i r e , a s e x e m p l i f i e d i n t h e t r a v e l e r ' s m e m o r y o f a m a n w h o r e c o u n t e d his p r a c t i c e o f r a n d o m l y choosing someone in a c r o w d to follow: " f o r hours, o n and o f f t r a i n s , i n a n d o u t o f s h o p s , i n l i f t s , a c r o s s p a r k s " (14). W h e n D e s saix has this m a n describe t h e process as p r o d u c t i v e o f " u n b e a r a b l e b l i s s " (14), w e m i g h t w e l l s u s p e c t t h a t i t is B a r t h e s ' s i d e a o f bliss h e is i n v o k i n g . L i k e C a s a n o v a , i n t r o d u c e d later in t h e b o o k , t h e p u r s u e r " w a s n ' t h u n t i n g f o r h a p p i n e s s . . . , w h i c h is a l w a y s e p i s o d i c , h e w a s t r y i n g t o e x p e r i e n c e b l i s s " (254). A n d as w i t h B a r d i e s , bliss t u r n s o u t t o b e t h e m o m e n t o f a n e x p e r i e n t i a l " g a p , " a I e m porn ry loss o f s e l f - p o s s e s s i o n . T h i s m o m e n t m i g h t b e " l i k e w i i k i n g u p w i t h o u t a s e l f in a n I/.'
K H I H I M '
11
11
II
Ivl'l
u
HITKHN
u n k n o w n c o u n t r y " (14), o r l i k e " s t e p f p i n g ] o f f a t r a i n a t a n u n k n o w n station f a r f r o m a n y w h e r e [ w h e n ] t h e train clatters r o u n d a b e n d i n t o silence a n d y o u ' r e l e f t s t a n d i n g t h e r e , m o m e n t a r i l y w i t h o u t a s e l f ' (25). I n B a r t h e s ' s w o r k , b l i s s is i n e x t r i c a b l y l i n k e d w i t h t e x t u a l i t y : " ' t h e pleasure o f the text." T h i s points t o another feature o f Dessaix's b o o k , its a l l u s i v e n e s s a n d i n t e r t e x t u a l i t y , w h i c h a r e c o n t a i n e d w i t h i n a l a r g e , m a r k e d l y p o s t m o d e r n , field o f r e f e r e n c e . A t o n e p o i n t , s o m e w h a t archly, t h e traveler notes, " 1 d i d n ' t care a scrap a b o u t w h e t h e r o r n o t I wrote another b o o k , g o t the n e w b a t h r o o m cupboards built, ever r e a l l y u n d e r s t o o d p o s t s t r u c t u r a l i s m , e v e r r e a l l y t r a v e l l e d a g a i n " (123). Y e t t h e letters a r e f u l l o f r e f e r e n c e s t o m o d i s h c o n t e m p o r a r y a u t h o r s : Patricia H i g h s m i t h gives t h e traveler a n audience, a n d a m o n g t h e m a n y names he drops are those o f V i k r a m Seth, P a u l A u s t e r , G e o r g e S t e i n e r , a n d M a r i o V a r g a s L l o s a (27). T h e r e a r e n u m e r o u s , e x a g g e r a t edly self-conscious meditations o n walled gardens a n d ghettos, while one o f the traveler's interlocutors " f a v o u r e d B a r t h e s ' theory o f the city t o w e r : it's t h e city-dweller's belvedere, t u r n i n g t h e cityscape b a c k i n t o n a t u r e " (117). T h i s s a m e figure, a G e r m a n a c a d e m i c v a c a t i o n i n g i n Venice n a m e d Professor E s c h e n b a u m , seems t o b e a ludic a m a l g a m o f Thomas Mann's Gustav v o n Aschenbach a n d Michel Foucault. E s c h e n b a u m observes, f o r instance, that " C a s a n o v a a n d M a r c o P o l o h a v e c o m e t o r e p r e s e n t e n t i r e . . . 'mentalites' (241); t h e t r a v e l e r e x p e c t s h i m t o give a n a n s w e r t o o n e o f his q u e s t i o n s t h a t " w o u l d i n v o l v e t h e O t h e r , a n d p o s s i b l y T r a n s g r e s s i o n " (132); a n d w h e n E s c h e n b a u m expatiates o n C a s a n o v a as " y e t a n o t h e r s u b v e r t e r o f p a r a d i g m s , " a n d as a n e x e r c i s e r o f t r a n s g r e s s i v e s e x u a l i t y , t h e t r a v e l e r is v i n d i c a t e d , f o r he h a d guessed t h a t " t h e w o r d 'transgressive' w o u l d c o m e u p e v e n t u a l l y " (251). T h e i n v a l i d ' s t r a v e l s a r e p l a y f u l , h e r e a s e l s e w h e r e , i n a knowing, redoubled manner. T h e t r a v e l e r ' s " s t a g e s " — L o c a r n o , V i c e n z a , P a d u a ( w i t h t h e letters all w r i t t e n f r o m V e n i c e , a n d w i t h V i c e n z a a s a " h e l l , " t h e j o u r n e y ' s n a d i r ) — l i g h t l y e c h o t h e s t a g e s o f D a n t e ' s Divina Commedia, t h o u g h i n i n c o r r e c t o r d e r , a s t h e e d i t o r n o t e s . T h e Divina Commedia acts as t h e l e a d i n g i n t e r t e x t f o r t h e Night Letters, l e n d i n g t h e c o n t e m p o r a r y b o o k the a u r a o f a n " o p e n " m e d i e v a l allegory. B u t each stage o f the D a n t e a n itinerary also incorporates allegorical narratives that align t h e text m o r e closely w i t h c o n t e m p o r a r y ( p o s t ) m o d e r n textual practices. L o c a r n o p r e s e n t s ( h e tale o f t h e p e r e g r i n a t i o n s o f a n e r o t i c a m u l e t o f Indian origin through O r i e n t a l , L e v a n t i n e , and northern Italian hands; V i c e n z a o f f e r s a li i g h t c u i n g t a l e o f t h e b i z a n v s e x u a l c o d e s o f V e n i c e 1
I ' i'. 1 M o m i H N I I
1
A M11 '
1 ,' \
a r o u n d the time o f M a r c o P o l o ; a n d P a d u a incorporates a n extended conversation between traveler a n d professor that contrasts
Marco
P o l o a n d C a s a n o v a as journeyer-adventurers. a n d that provides the A u s t r a l i a n traveler w i t h "blissful" m o m e n t s , passing f r o m C a s a n o v a to D a n t e , that eventually bring h i m t o the decision t o return " h o m e . " Professor E s c h e n b a u m — n e v e r short o f a theory—believes that P o l o 6
a n d C a s a n o v a , w h o turns o u t t o b e bisexual, each represents " o n e important kind of journeying": A l m o s t o p p o s i t e k i n d s , i n f a c t . A n d j o u r n e y i n g , a f t e r a l l , is s o f u n d a mental to the w a y w e h u m a n s think o f ourselves a n d assign our lives a m e a n i n g . E v e r y s e c o n d b o o k y o u r e a d is a b o u t s o m e k i n d o f j o u r n e y , r e a l l y , isn't it? A n d w e c o n s t a n t l y talk a b o u t p a t h s in l i f e — w a y s , roads, progress, stages a n d so on- -all travel metaphors, w h e n
you
t h i n k a b o u t it. I w o u l d s a y t h a t M a r c o P o l o a n d C a s a n o v a h a v e c o m e to s t a n d f o r c o m p l e t e l y different w a y s o f t r a v e l l i n g — a n d t h e r e f o r e o f l i v i n g o u t y o u r l i f e . (241-42)
E s c h e n b a u m ' s d i s q u i s i t i o n seems as i f it s h o u l d a c c o r d well w i t h t h e afflicted A u s t r a l i a n ' s views o n travel, especially w h e n h e presents C a s a n o v a as o n e w h o " z i g z a g g e d t h r o u g h t i m e i n search o f timeless m o m e n t s , blissful instants w h e n the past a n d the f u t u r e ceased t o exist for him- - t h e only k i n d o f spiritual perfection h e could conceive o f (254). Y e t D e s s a i x ' s p r o t a g o n i s t u l t i m a t e l y p r e f e r s a v e r s i o n o f D a n t e a n spiraling: t r a v e l i n g as " g r a d u a l l y s u f f u s i n g m e r e h u m a n k n o w i n g w i t h timeless seeing ( u n t i l y o u a r e s e e n — w h i c h d o e s n ' t so m u c h d e m o l i s h as p u t t o o n e side t h e l o n g d r a w n - o u t m o d e r n a r g u m e n t s a b o u t s u b j e c t i v i t y a n d o b j e c t i v i t y . . . ) " (262-63). D e s s a i x ' s t r a v e l e r w r i t e r , h a v i n g c o m p l e t e d h i s j o u r n e y , sets o f f f o r h o m e h a v i n g a p p a r ently escaped the nets o f choice a n d chance. I n D e s s a i x ' s b o o k , e v i d e n t l y , r e a d e r s c a n find a m p l e m a t e r i a l f o r a t h e o r e t i c s o f t h e self, o f illness, a n d o f t r a v e l ( a n d , b y i m p l i c a t i o n , t r a v e l w r i t i n g ) . T h e b o o k ' s r i c h n e s s c a n b e g a u g e d b y its d e p l o y m e n t o f v a r i o u s p o s t m o d e r n i s t t e x t u a l s t r a t e g i e s , b e s t s u m m e d u p i n its t h o r o u g h g o i n g s e l f - r e l i e x i v e n e s s , w h a t w e m i g h t c a l l its " m e t a - a c t i v i t y . " I t is w o r t h n o t i n g h e r e t h a t t r a v e l b o o k s — p a r t i c u l a r l y t h o s e t h a t d e c l a r e themselves as g e n e r i c — d o n o t generally e x p l o i t o p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r tex tual play a n d reflexivity. S u c h play m i g h t perhaps threaten the differ ent kinds o f authority t h e traveler claims, including that o f truth t e l l i n g , i t s e l f d e p e n d e n t o n t h e f i c t i o n o f a c e r i l e r e d self. O n e c o n t e m p o r a r y writer, h o w e v e r , has increasingly f o u n d w a y s o f (re)vivifying
1 /.|
I'OUIir, 1 , " i 1 n 1 \ I'i'WHI'l
the travel account through the use o f a variety o f metanarrative tech niques. This writer is Paul T h e r o u x , w h o s e cross-generic My Other Life (1996) mixes fiction, autobiography, and travel in a virtuoso, confess edly self-indulgent performance. My Other Life—like all o f T h e r o u x ' s travel narratives—raises a series o f important questions about travel writing: about its status as a "truth" narrative, its relation to the per formance o f the self, and its right to claim the privileges o f fiction. It is the " s e l f that is most obviously "indulged" in travel writing, for as T h e r o u x remarks in one o f his blunt asides, " O n e o f the delu sions o f travel is that y o u can be a new person in a new land" (432). Elsewhere, T h e r o u x comments with characteristic self-irony on the travel b o o k : T h e r e w a s s o m e t h i n g so artificial a b o u t a travel b o o k : t a k i n g notes, a n d then lugging y o u r notes b a c k a n d m a k i n g t h e m into a b o o k , as t h o u g h in justification o f all that self-indulgence. Y e t w h a t w a s m o r e self-indulgent t h a n w r i t i n g s u c h a b o o k ? A s a w r i t e r , I felt s o m e h o w that I w a s forever h a v i n g t o account f o r m y m o v e m e n t s , a n din so d o i n g h a v i n g t o m a k e t h e m seem as t h o u g h they mattered.
(276)
But which self is being indulged here; and w h a t does it mean, a n y w a y , to indulge the self? T h e r o u x continues to enjoy the somewhat dubious reputation o f belonging to Sterne's category o f the "Splenetic T r a v eller" (see, for example, Porter 57-59). This type o f traveler, in the uncompromising words o f one o f T h e r o u x ' s reviewers, "drags his e m o tional b a g g a g e along with him on excursions . . . merely injecting his fluctuating biorhythms into the heart o f his tales" (Buhasz n.p.). But it is more complicated than that; for while T h e r o u x has never explicitly joined postmodernist writers in theorizing the instability o f the self or its constructed character, in his travel b o o k s he has increasingly pre sented himself and the people he encounters as characters in fictions or as actors on the stage. " R e a l i t y for me w a s the past, and it was else where. T h i s — L o n d o n — w a s like a role I had been assigned to play, and I w a s as yet still unaware o f m y lines" (My Other Life 145). While T h e r o u x ' s novels tend to read as w o r k m a n l i k e contemporary fictions in the political-existential tradition of, say, C o n r a d , Greene, or Burgess, his travel b o o k s foreground intertextuality and performance, and all the self-referential trappings we usually associate with niclaliction. By following the increasingly favored—procedure o f nominating My Other Life a 110vol." T h e r o u x also claims the authority that the writer o f fiction o ' K c n iwa over the reader, ( A n t h o n y Burgess 7
l'<
i\
1 Mi
.1 n
11'
1
i 1
1 •' 1 1
S MM
1
"
the novelist becomes " A n t h o n y Burgess," a fictional character, a n d an episode presenting a dinner party at w h i c h " B u r g e s s " is a guest becomes a fiction [My Other Life].) In this w a y , T h e r o u x retains the freedom to c o m p o s e a (Active) autobiography, a travel account, and a c o m m e n t a r y o n the self as at once exhibitable entity a n d concealed identity. T h e r o u x does not so m u c h "inject his fluctuating b i o r h y t h m s " into his travel tales as hide and disclose them in a series o f (mock-)fantastic episodes. T h e r o u x ' s Active/autobiographical fantasies, however, d o n o t emerge as part o f a project to dissolve the self; quite the reverse, they reaffirm the authority o f the self through the act o f shaping the episode, inventing its details, characterizing its agents, and masking its fictionally fantastic producer b y blurring the b o u n d a r y between "fact" and "fiction." T h e r o u x invites us t o speculate about w h o he "really" is, but n o t that he really is: " W e are better o f f k n o w i n g that w e belong here, alone in our o w n world. N o one is waiting for us somewhere else" (436). The dedicatee o f My Other Life is the British writer Jonathan R a b a n , the symmetry o f w h o s e writing life with his o w n must surely not have escaped T h e r o u x . B o t h writers have divided their production between novels a n d travel b o o k s ; both are m u c h given to intertextual referencing a n d casual theorizing in their travel narratives; and, more specifically, T h e r o u x ' s "British" travel b o o k , The Kingdom by the Sea (1984) is neatly counterpointed by R a b a n ' s " A m e r i c a n " one, Hunting Mister Heartbreak (1990). T o c a p this symmetry, whereas T h e r o u x lived in Britain during the middle period o f his career, R a b a n m o v e d to A m e r i c a in the middle stage o f his. R a b a n ' s w o r k , like T h e r o u x ' s , shows increasing tendencies toward metafictionality. In an episode in Hunting Mister Heartbreak, R a b a n (transformed here into the genial m a n o f letters " R a i n b i r d " ) finds himself pleasantly occupied in the city of Seattle. T h e city is just the right size; he finds an affordable apart ment with a view; he has a novelist friend there he can meet for a drink and chat in the evenings; and there are several interesting people to interview—an ideal situation, all in all, for the itinerant novelist. R a i n bird soon plans a novel, fictionalizing his situation, about a gay actor who has relocated from N e w Y o r k and a K o r e a n w o m a n w h o has "learned the astounding temerity that h a d at last enabled her to walk out o f a K o r e a n marriage" (312). B u t to finance his relocation, Raban—travel writer- needs first to complete his travelogue. Decid ing that a final chapter, to be set in F l o r i d a , is needed, he Hies off (o the K e y s for a l i t t l e e x p l o r a t o r y c o a s t i n g . A twilight trip, perhaps, f o r t h i s
f/<»
'IOIIHINTS W I T H
I M ' l WMITHMS
inveterate traveler-storyteller; a t a r o u n d t h e same time, R a b a n a n d T h e r o u x discover the z o n e where autobiographical travelogue merges i m p e r c e p t i b l y i n t o t h e f a n t a s y l i f e o f fiction. T h e r o u x e n d s My Other Life w i t h a n e p i l o g u e , r e m i n i s c e n t o f C h a t w i n t h e c o l l e c t o r , i n w h i c h h e c o m p i l e s a list o f o b j e c t s a s s e m b l e d by v a r i o u s m e a n s a n d i n d i f f e r i n g c i r c u m s t a n c e s o n his travels. B u t t h e similarity b e t w e e n T h e r o u x a n d C h a t w i n falls s h o r t o f t h a t b e t w e e n T h e r o u x a n d R a b a n ; f o r w h e r e a s C h a t w i n establishes t h e relation between travel a n d collection t h r o u g h " n o m a d i c a l l y " associative nar rative, T h e r o u x n e i t h e r collects (generally) n o r travels as a " n o m a d , " a n d h i s t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s t e n d t o t r e a t e p i s o d e s as f r e i g h t e d c o n f r o n t a t i o n s r a t h e r t h a n as e l e m e n t s i n f r e e c o l l a g e . A s a " n o m a d , " C h a t w i n seems t o insinuate h i m s e l f into situations r a t h e r t h a n i m p o s e h i m s e l f o n t h e m ; w i t h o u t necessarily r e m o v i n g h i m s e l f f r o m t h e scenes h e describes, h e e x t r a p o l a t e s objects a n d stories f r o m t h e m o r assembles theories f r o m their scattered fragments. T h e r o u x , v e r y u n - " n o m a d i cally," projects himself emphatically, indulging the anxieties o f travel while d e f e n d i n g his a p p a r e n t l y v u l n e r a b l e e g o . B u t w h i l e the t w o w r i t ers p r o d u c e d i s t i n c t i v e v e r s i o n s o f t r a v e l a n d t r a v e l w r i t i n g , b o t h s u g gest d i f f e r e n t p o s t m o d e r n i s t p o s s i b i l i t i e s : C h a t w i n t h r o u g h t h e fluid narrativity o f the " n o m a d , " a n d T h e r o u x t h r o u g h p r o g r a m m e d travel as a s e l f - r e f l e x i v e n a r r a t i v e site. T h e s e w r i t e r s , a l t h o u g h i n v e r y d i f f e r ent w a y s , d e m o n s t r a t e t h a t considered travel c a n n o t e n d o r s e a n y single m o d e l o f m o v e m e n t , self, o r w r i t i n g . " P o s t m o d e r n i s t possibilities": t h i s s e c t i o n h a s a s s u m e d t h a t p o s t m o d e r n i s m c a n n o t b e d e f i n e d as a unified field b u t m u s t b e u n d e r s t o o d , o n t h e c o n t r a r y , a s a c o n t e s t e d site i n c u l t u r a l d i s c o u r s e . P o s t m o d e r n i s m does o f course impinge o n a n d overlap with travel writing; b u t as this d i s c u s s i o n h a s s u g g e s t e d , it c a n o n l y d o s o i n d i f f e r i n g a s p e c t s a t d i f f e r e n t t i m e s . C a l v i n o ' s cities i n d e x t h e a b s t r a c t i n g a n d r e d u p l i c a t i v e tendencies o f travel d e s c r i p t i o n ; b u t t h e t e x t u a l effects Invisible Cities m a k e s p o s s i b l e w o u l d f r e e z e i n its t r a c k s — w o u l d i r o n i cally i m m o b i l i z e — a n y travel b o o k that d e p l o y e d t h e m b e y o n d a cer tain point. Similarly, hyperrealism a n d virtuality p r o v e useful in fore g r o u n d i n g incongruity a n d a n o m a l y ; b u t in insisting o n the fake a n d I he p r i m a c y o f the perfect surface, t h e y also s u b v e r t the travel b o o k ' s project t o p r o v i d e a sense o f experiential d e p t h . T h e dissolution o f t h e u n i t a r y subject a l r e a d y t h r e a t e n e d in l h e p r o c e s s o f 1 r a v e l a l s o p l a c e s a l risk t h e l a y e r e d , e n i g i m i l i c t r a n s a c t i o n s b e t w e e n s e l f a n d p l a c e ( h a t s o m e travel n a r r a t i v e s p r o v i d e . T o p o s i t i o n Ihe t r a v e l e r a s a n ideal I ' O N T M O I I I ' i H N i i iNHMiSHII '
i //
n o m a d is to snatch at a metaphor one might not be too h a p p y defend ing—to be a (European) n o m a d today, after all, is to enjoy a privilege, an availability o f options, which is obviously quite different from that o f the desert herdsman/huntsman. C h a m b e r s ' s attempt to conflate n o m a d with migrant calls, equally, for skeptical attention. A n d while the various techniques o f metafiction provide scope for injecting a sense o f play into travel narrative, by definition they also detract from the travel b o o k as a more or less "authentic" autobiographical account. Nonetheless, if travel writers turn to these techniques more often, and use them more discriminately, they m a y well help to induce a much-needed critical reexamination o f earlier Eurocentric theories and practices of travel writing.
E C O T O P I A S : T R A V E L I N G IN THE NEW A G E Y e t h o w "visionary," how innovative, can travel writing ever really be? A n d h o w can it respond, in a different w a y , to the dangers o f extinc tion: to the risk o f "disappearing" cultures, and to global environmen tal threats? In Ernest C a l l e n b a c h ' s futuristic novel, Ecotopia (1975), a large c h u n k o f the A m e r i c a n W e s t C o a s t has seceded from the United States. " E c o t o p i a , " the state thus formed, is a self-governing, survivaloriented community, committed to the environment in an age of increasing global scarcity. Such visionary communities•— a t h r o w b a c k to the countercultural sixties—are m u c h in v o g u e as the twentieth cen tury draws inexorably toward its close. T h e millenarian revivalism oi the N e w A g e — a l s o an outgrowth o f sixties' optimism—is partly a response to the overdetermined postmodern rhetoric o f exhaustion.^ Y e t it also belongs to the globalized c o m m o d i t y culture o f postmoder nity, one characterized by the saturation o f media images o f a global future and by the conversion o f endangerment, a genuine threat at many levels, into the media-friendly spectacle o f a world at mortal risk. T h e N e w A g e desire for " g l o b a l consciousness" and the postmod ern fascination with apocalypse converge in commodified expressions o f environmental angst. O n e such expression is ecotourism: one o f the fastest growing branches o f the modern tourist industry. Ecotourism, as one o f its critics, Joe B a n d y , has recently pointed out, stands poised between the seemingly contradictory agendas o f environmental sustainability and industrial development. Ostensibly il is an a t t e m p t t o
17 K
I n n H P , I '! W i l l i
I \ r i ' W K I I I I'
d e m o c r a t i z e leisure c o n s u m p t i o n , b o t h b y e n c o u r a g i n g local p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n its e n v i r o n m e n t a l projects a n d b y raising consciousness o f g l o b a l issues ( p o v e r t y , s c a r c i t y , t h e p r o t e c t i o n o f t h e l i f e w o r l d , a n d s o o n ) . Y e t a s B a n d y s u g g e s t s , e c o t o u r i s m is as m u c h a v a r i a n t o n as a n a l t e r n a t i v e t o t h e " m a i n s t r e a m " t o u r i s t i n d u s t r y , a n d , as s u c h , it remains g o v e r n e d b y tourism's neocolonial relations o f p o w e r : " E c o t o u r i s m is a t r a n s f o r m a t i v e p o l i c y o f i n c l u s i o n a n d d e m o c r a t i z a t i o n , a s well as a p r o d u c t o f a racialized justification f o r m o d e r n i z a t i o n , in w h i c h m a r g i n a l i z e d peoples are subject t o a n e w d e p e n d e n c y a n d a n e w c o l o n i a l i s m " (541). E c o t o u r i s m , o r n a t u r e t o u r i s m , a s it is s o m e t i m e s c a l l e d , is " t h i n k a b l e o n l y i n a n e r a i n w h i c h n a t u r e h a s b e c o m e a n u n s t a b l e s p h e r e o f o u r p a n i c k e d l i f e w o r l d s t h a t is e v e r m o r e a t r i s k o f total a n n i h i l a t i o n , a n d a spectacle o f a p o s t m o d e r n c o m m o d i t y culture o f d e f e r r e d aesthetic pleasure, leisure c o n s u m p t i o n , a n d v i r t u a l a d v e n t u r e " (541). T h i s suggests in t u r n a n alternative v i e w o f e c o t o u r i s m ' s literary b y - p r o d u c t , nature writing: o n e t h a t stresses t h e p o s t m o d e r n c o m m e r cialization o f narratives o f disappearance ("vanishing worlds," " e n d a n g e r e d species," a n d so f o r t h ) , a n d t h e i n c o r p o r a t i o n o f these narratives into a Levi-Straussian redemptive allegory that combines (collective) e n v i r o n m e n t a l consciousness w i t h (personal) spiritual quest. T h i s section collapses t h e distinction b e t w e e n n a t u r e writing, which focuses m a i n l y o n the p h e n o m e n a l lifeworld, a n d m o r e c o n v e n tional f o r m s o f travel narrative that d o c u m e n t the traveler-writer's adventures. I n t h e process, several connections emerge that m a y b e a t t r i b u t e d i n p a r t t o t h e c u l t u r a l c l i m a t e o f p o s t m o d e r n i t y : first, t h e c o o p t a t i o n o f p r i m i t i v i s t aesthetics i n t o a c o n s u m e r - d r i v e n fascination w i t h s c a r c i t y — s y m b o l i z e d in t h e traveler's e x a m i n a t i o n o f " v a n i s h i n g species" ( o r , in s o m e cases, e x p l o r a t i o n o f "lost w o r l d s " ) ; s e c o n d , t h e l i n k b e t w e e n t h e s p e c t a c u l a r i z a t i o n o f e n v i r o n m e n t a l crisis a n d t h e marketing o f N e w A g e m y t h s o f spiritual regeneration o r a w a k e n i n g : a n d t h i r d , t h e use o f t r a v e l / n a t u r e w r i t i n g as a vehicle f o r t h e p o p u l a r ization o f "salvage e t h n o g r a p h y " (Clifford), a n df o r the commodiflcation o f spiritual a n d ecological alternatives t h r o u g h the m o t i f o f the traveler's quest. S u c h conflations b r i n g i n t o a l i g n m e n t a p p a r e n t l y dis parate kinds o f travel narrative: f r o m the adventurer L a u r e n s V a n d e r I ' o s t ' s m e t a p h y s i c a l m e m o i r The Lost World of the Kalahari (1958) t o ( h e n a t u r a l i s t D a v i d Q u a m m e n ' s e v o l u t i o n i s t p a r a b l e The Song of the Dodo (1996) t o t h e s e l f - s l y k x ! g u m M a r i o M o r g a n ' s N e w A g e o d y s s e y 1 0
1 1
P O N T M U O H K N 11 iNHHAttil >
1
"1
Mutant Message Down Under (1994). These narratives attempt, in very different w a y s and with varying degrees o f self-consciousness, to account for "disappearing" realities or perceptions o f reality, and to articulate " c a r i n g " alternatives to the destructive material culture o f the West. N o n e o f these texts is identiiiably postmodern in its aes thetics, and V a n der Post's and M o r g a n ' s are resolutely antimodern (if still arguably modern/.?/) in their primitivist nostalgia. W h a t links them is their reverence for more or less threatened nature. This reaction is characteristic o f the modernist desire for ecological reconnection; but it has been assimilated in an age o f increasing environmental awareness to a postmodern c o m m o d i t y culture: one in which nature is presented as an edifying spectacle for consumption, and as a repository for spiri tual wisdom available at market price. T w o postwar narratives o f disappearance that present similar eco logical dilemmas are V a n der Post's previously mentioned The Lost World of the Kalahari and Peter Matthiessen's The Cloud Forest: A Chronicle of the South American Wilderness (1961). Both narratives fol l o w the pattern o f the spiritual quest into the interior, V a n der Post's taking him into the South African K a l a h a r i desert-region in search o f the talismanic Bushman, Matthiessen's taking him on a more labyrin thine j o u r n e y through South A m e r i c a that ends in another "lost w o r l d " : the ancient rain forests o f Peru. Both o f these journeys, spiri tually motivated, a m o u n t to a kind o f surrogate pilgrimage: for V a n der Post, the desert and its original—now endangered—inhabitants are spiritual entities, an antidote to the destructive material culture o f the West; for Matthiessen, the wilderness is a site o f personal (and col lective) redemption: the place he goes to purge himself o f the corrupted values o f Western civilization. The tone in b o t h w o r k s is Levi-Straussian: serious, moralistic, lamenting the plight o f "primitive" peoples whose authenticity has gone unrecognized, and whose w a y o f life, irrevocably altered by their contact with (Western) modernity, is n o w "degenerating" (Matthiessen) or residual in the face o f extinction ( V a n der Post). T h e following passage illustrates the melancholic awareness o f deterioration that suffuses The Cloud Forest: " A t present the C a s h i b o [Indians] are in a degenerate state and m a y soon disappear; unlike the river C h a m u s , they have failed to adapt to civilization. N o t only is their culture disappearing, but they manifest such s y m p t o m s o f decline as indiscriminate exchange o f mates and two husbands for each wife" (257). The Lost World of the Kalahari, meanwhile, is redolent o f the nostalgia o f N o b l e Savagery: 12
i8n
1 O I U K S 1 s v i n i l s
wi
[ T h e R i v e r B u s h m a n ' s ] l e a n - t o shelter o f grass a n d reeds o n his island . . . w a s s u r r o u n d e d w i t h m o u n d s o f the bones o f fish h e h a d c o n s u m e d over the years. N o o n e k n e w where h ec a m e f r o m o r w h o his p e o p l e h a d b e e n . W h e t h e r h e k n e w h i m s e l f , n o o n e c o u l d tell. I s t o o d there stirred t o the heart, w a t c h i n g h i m progress across the b u r n i n g w a t e r into t h e p a p y r u s s t a n d i n g s o erect b e f o r e t h e night. I n that m y t h o l o g i c a l light o f the d y i n g d a y h e seemed t o m g . the complete s y m b o l o f t h e s i l e n t f a t e o f h i s r a c e . (141)
Matthiessen's and, particularly, V a n der Post's pathos for "disap pearing" A b o r i g i n a l cultures is recorded with Rousseauesque nostalgic fervor and an almost biblical intensity. B o t h writers turn, as if to seek scientific support for their romantic myths, to anthropological models: Matthiessen is most obviously indebted to Tristes Tropiques (1955), that landmark text in which Levi-Strauss converts a n t h r o p o l o g y (the study o f man) into " e n t r o p o l o g y " (the study o f disintegration) by expressing the conviction that native cultures are d y i n g out, to be replaced b y a global "monoculture"; and V a n der Post, for his part, appears to be influenced by the w o r k o f earlier evolutionists, such as E d w a r d T y l o r , w h o recuperate "primitive" cultures even as they c o n sign them to the historical trashcan, and w h o disguise their cultural arrogance b y appealing to a mythicized indigenous w i s d o m . W h a t is evident, in each case, is that the conventions o f travel writing are being used to popularize outdated anthropological notions (hierarchies o f h u m a n "development," "disappearance," the idea o f a "pristine" native culture). Perhaps foremost a m o n g these notions is the idea o f anthropological rescue. A s James Clifford points out, the idea o f res cue, h o w e v e r vitiated within the contemporary discipline, has still retained m u c h o f its earlier ideological force: T h e rationale f o r f o c u s i n g one's a t t e n t i o n o n v a n i s h i n g lore, f o r res cuing in writing the k n o w l e d g e o fold people, m a y be s t r o n g . . . . I d o n o t w i s h t o d e n y specific cases o f d i s a p p e a r i n g c u s t o m s a n d l a n guages, o r t o challenge the value o frecording such p h e n o m e n a . I d o , however, question, the assumption that with rapid change something essential ( " c u l t u r e " ) , a c o h e r e n t differential identity, vanishes. . . . S u c h attitudes, t h o u g h t h e y persist, are d i m i n i s h i n g . . .. B u t t h e alle g o r y o f s a l v a g e is d e e p l y i n g r a i n e d . ( " O n E t h n o g r a p h i c A l l e g o r y "
112 1 3 ) In c o n t e m p o r a r y travel writing, which is less concerned than anthro pology with the accuracy o f its terminology, or with the rules and reg ulations that govern its disciplinary practice, one might go further: one I W I ' M o m i M N
I I INHUAICII
(Kl
might g o so far as to say that "the allegory o f salvage"—the exoticist recuperation o f the disappearing native "other" (Behdad)—remains an essential ingredient o f what has always been a self-consciously mystificatory genre.'
3
Travel narratives like V a n der Post's and
Matthiessen's have little interest in explaining native customs or in assimilating their writers' observations to a coherent intellectual sys tem; instead, they aim to capitalize on the mystique o f authenticity: an authenticity, loosely associated with ancient peoples and "primitive" nature, which is perceived as disappearing, or as having disappeared, from the modern world. Here is a sample passage from The Lost
World
of the Kalahari: With our twentieth-century selves we have forgotten the importance of being truly and openly primitive. We have forgotten the art of our legitimate beginnings. We no longer know how to close the gap between the far past and the immediate present in ourselves. We need primitive nature, thefirstman in ourselves, it seems, as the lungs need air and the body food and water; yet we can only achieve it by a slink ing, often shameful back-door entrance. I thoughtfinallythat of all the nostalgias that haunt the human heart the greatest of them all, for me, is an everlasting longing to bring what is youngest home to what is oldest, in us all. ( 1 6 3 ) The shamanic ring to V a n der Post's statement is characteristic o f certain kinds o f spiritual travelogues that attempt, not only to quest after Aboriginal sources o f knowledge, but to mimic A b o r i g i n a l lead 4
ers—the legendary "wise m e n " o f their tribe.' V a n der Post's hieratic rhetoric, invoking the mysteries o f creation, helps set himself u p as a kind o f visionary, a divinatory Western seer. Matthiessen, to his credit, is well aware o f the perils o f such afflatus; and even though, like V a n der Post, he is by no means immune from romantic flights o f fancy, he tends to temper these with caution and a traveler's recourse to selfirony. (Like Levi-Strauss, Matthiessen adopts a skeptical, even scorn ful attitude toward the rumors and legends that continue to surround the figure o f the "tropical traveler" (see also chap. 2). "[Colonel] F a w cett has his disciples still," says Matthiessen at the outset o f his jungle adventures in The Cloud Forest, adventures that culminate in a haz ardous boat trip upriver in search o f the fabled Picha ruins. "I attracted [these disciples] like flies all the w a y upriver. But since I am doing m y best to remain hardheaded, I had better not report their sto ries here" (32). But: the stones creep in, nonetheless, and Matthiessen cannot help basking in their reflected glory. N o r is he averse to a little li MI HIS 1 ' W I T H 1 1 I ' l i W I t l T M I S
bragging o f his own: " A n d r e a s and I are the first white men to travel the P o n g o de M a n i q u e in what the Indians call 'the time o f the water.' Since this feat was the one farthest from our minds we thus became the greatest heroes malgre eux since the v o y a g e o f W r o n g - W a y C o r r i g a n " (213-14). These slippages are not u n c o m m o n in a genre much given to selfcongratulation, and Matthiessen remains, in many ways, an admirable example o f a travel writer w h o refuses to allow his ego to overshadow his collective cause. This cause has less to do with the Indian peoples he encounters than with the environment in which they live: one that, like them, is under threat. L i k e the g o o d naturalist he is, Matthiessen is sen sitive to ecological issues and well informed on the fluctuations and fragilities of the world's different ecosystems. (Van der Post, in con trast, offers little by w a y o f detailed nature description, and one is left with the impression that the K a l a h a r i functions primarily as a psychic or moral landscape: an objective correlative to the "lost w o r l d " cap tured in the writer's memories o f childhood.) Matthiessen is hardheaded enough, at least, to recognize his o w n fantasies o f innocence, and to take care not to project these onto a prelapsarian wilderness. The wilderness, as a mythicized " z o n e , " is thus as much a place o f deceit and lawlessness as it is a locus o f spirituality and a site for mys tical trains of thought. It is a "contaminated" area, not only through its exposure to (Western) mercantile interests but through the abuse of its resources, which have become chronically depleted. The myth o f eter nal return that is j o y o u s l y dramatized in The Lost World of the Kala hari is unavailable to a traveler, like Matthiessen, w h o has a clearer sense o f environmental history. Thus, while V a n der Post's and Matthiessen's texts are clearly derived from similar liberal-humanist agendas (despoliation o f the environment, mistreatment o f indigenous peoples, and so on), they fulfill, as narratives o f disappearance, very different ideological functions: whereas The Lost World of the Kalahari recaptures a—largely imagined—world o f the past to its cause o f spir itual revival (making V a n der Post an unlikely precursor o f N e w A g e gurus such as M o r g a n ) , The Cloud Forest records an elegy to an irrecoverable w a y o f life. Both texts are "allegories of salvage," but only V a n der Post's is successful—mainly because it obscures the hislory behind its own triumphal mythology. F o r in eventually conjuring Hie reappearance o f (he "authentic" Bushman, Van der Post's narra tive inadvertently erases the ciivumslances thai have led to his near extinction. A s Mnty Louise 1*1 at I has observed, Van dor Post's narra-
i'" i \ 1 M - iim-MN 1 1 iNitn/vUIH't
<)•'• 1
tive advertises its o w n contradictions: on the one hand, it historicizes the Bushmen "as survivor-victims o f E u r o p e a n imperialism"; on the other it "naturalize[s] and objectifies] them as primal beings virtually untouched b y history" ( " F i e l d w o r k " 48). T h u s , while The Cloud Forest is disabused by the end o f its previous "jungle hallucinations," The Lost World of the Kalahari succumbs in spite o f itself to its illusion o f Timeless N a t u r e . ' It is V a n der Post, the p r o t o - N e w A g e seer, not the " m a g i c a l " Bushman, w h o is sanctified in a narrative that ends up b y reinstating the white m a n ' s proprietary myths: 5
The desert looked as empty as it had ever been. Yet in that vast world behind the glitter of pointed leaves and in the miracle of sand made alive, and thorn of steel set alight with flower by the rain, the child in me had become reconciled to the man. The desert could never be empty again. For there my aboriginal heart now had living kinsmen and a home on which to turn. I got back into my Land-Rover. I drove over the crest and began the long, harsh journey back to our twenti eth-century world beyond the timeless Kalahari blue. (279) A different kind o f narrative o f disappearance is one that focuses on endangered species: into this category come t w o recent studies, D i a n e A c k e r m a n ' s The Rarest of the Rare: Vanishing Animals, Time less Worlds (1995) and D a v i d Q u a m m e n ' s The Song of the Dodo: Island Biogeography in an Age of Extinction (1996). B o t h o f these b o o k s are popular accounts o f the biological process o f extinction, written b y professional naturalists w h o , like Matthiessen, double as travel writ ers. The Rarest of the Rare and The Song of the Dodo are perhaps best classified as nature writing: they focus, that is, on description o f the natural environment and its various lifeworlds, deemphasizing in the process the specific adventures—and the general self-absorption—of the traveler-observer. N a t u r e writing is more likely than other kinds o f travel narrative to moralize a b o u t its surroundings, less likely to psy chologize the traveler-observer's personal experience. A t times, as in Barry L o p e z ' s w o r k (see chap. 2), the traveler-observer is ironically immobilized: at a hidden vantage-point, recording the m o v e m e n t s o f other creatures (birds and animals); or at a lab desk, using biological data to develop theories o f migration. Notwithstanding, biological fleldworkers are another kind o f traveler, however much they might w a n t to distinguish themselves from mere tourists or casual observers, and however much Ihey might want to d o w n p l a y their own subjective roles. ( A s was argued in an cnrlicr cluiplcr, I ho position o f L o p e z is
1H4
T o w n s i>;
wren
1
v i>MWttt
11
i'
somewhat anomalous: far from wishing to hide behind a set o f m o r e or less objective data, L o p e z infuses his material with his o w n finely nuanced subjectivity.) A s M a r y Louise Pratt has argued for ethnogra phers, so might also be said o f naturalists: there are
continuities
between their accounts and more o r t h o d o x forms o f travel narrative— continuities that blur the boundaries, on one level, between ama teurism and professionalism and, on another, betweeh the d o m i n a n t strategies o f journalistic
narration (travel writing) and
informed
description (scientific research) (see also Pratt, " F i e l d w o r k " ) . N a t u r e writing, which is clearly designed in most cases for a lay (if educated) audience, mediates between these modes: it can be seen simultaneously as a carefully researched, ethically saturated m e d i u m for the raising o f global consciousness o f environmental issues and as a popularized, thoroughly commodified vehicle for the recycling o f journalistic cliches a b o u t endangerment on the planet. Clearly, not all nature writing falls into the category o f the cau tionary tale. Y e t it is equally clear that nature writing thrives, ironi cally, on the fear o f natural cataclysm, and that its current b o o m can be attributed b o t h to the threat o f unprecedented extinction and to the need—as A c k e r m a n ' s subtitle graphically illustrates—to reinstate the m y t h o f a "timeless w o r l d " in an era when time, for so m a n y w h o live in it, appears to be running out. Hence the p a r a d o x , w h o s e anthropo logical equivalent can also be seen in w o r k s such as V a n der Post's, that popular b o o k s on "rarity" have b e c o m e almost a c o m m o n p l a c e ; and that "vanishing creatures" and "lost w o r l d s " victoriously reemerge, in writing. B o o k s like A c k e r m a n ' s and Q u a m m e n ' s are alert to these ironies, well attuned to their o w n commodified status. O f the t w o , it is A c k e r man's that plays most obviously on the fears o f its lay readership. T a k ing care to distinguish itself from dry academic studies o f biodiversity, A c k e r m a n ' s b o o k bills itself as both a tribute to the Earth as a single, if multifarious, organism and a warning that it must be protected, or else it and its creatures (including ourselves) will surely perish. T h e tone, as might be expected, is consistently homiletic, as can be seen from a ran d o m sample taken from the introduction: The vanishing of so many other animals may indicate that we're not far from the brink ourselves. If we'd like our species to hang around for a while, we must be vigilant about what we're doing to other species, because evolution is a set of handshakes, not a list; of winners, (xiv ..xv) I ' O N T M n l H ' I ' N I ( I N I l> A I I 1 1 <(
iH
We are among the rarest of the rare not because of our numbers, but because of the unlikeliness of our being here at all, the pace of our evolution, our powerful grip on the planet, and the precariousness of our future. We arc evolutionary whizz kids who are better able to transform the world than to understand it. . . . Because vast herds of humans dwell on the planet, we assume we are invulnerable. . . . Because our cunning has allowed us to harness great rivers, to fly through the sky, although we were not born to, and even to add our artifacts to the sum of creation, we assume we are omnipotent. Because we have invented an arbitrary way to frame the doings of nature, which we call time, we assume we are immortal, (xviii-xix) Humans could be among the fossils other life-forms speculate about one day (if they speculate), puzzling over our tragedy as we puzzle over the dinosaurs', (xiii) These dire injunctions remind us o f A c k e r m a n ' s view o f biodiversity as " a sort o f rigid morality play" (xvi), with herself cast in the role o f prin cipal moralist as well as mystical "naturalist/poet w h o patrol[s] the wilds o f the world and the emotional j u n g l e o f ourselves with snares m a d e o f sentences and darts tipped with w o n d e r " (xx). A c k e r m a n ' s task, playing on "rarity," is to show the preciousness o f existence while lamenting the dwindling numbers o f some o f the world's most precious creatures. A n d her o w n language, as if in sympathy, also lapses at times into the precious, most obviously in those overwritten sequences where she compares (rare) m o n k seals to "a dying race o f m o n k s , swimming through underwater caves in a cathedral o f light" (28), or where she likens her search for rarity to "an arduous religious jour ney," a pilgrimage during which " w e will take m a n y unavoidable steps and endure m a n y hardships" (60). "In ancient times," she continues, "people went on quests to behold a sacred relic or other artifact. T h e journey was as important as the goal, m o r e important, in fact, because it w a s meant to anneal the soft metals o f the soul" (60). Such bargainbasement mysticism undermines a b o o k that is, in other respects, a well-observed and ecologically sensitive variation on the travelogue as spiritual quest.
16
W h a t is most noticeable in the b o o k , t h o u g h , as in
V a n der Post's, is its tendency to ahistoricism: its ironic reversion to the very primal myths its subject—extinction—debunks. T h u s , while A c k erman is at pains to point out that the A m a z o n i a n rain forest is not the original G a r d e n o f Eden, or that the romantic image o f the fieldworker in a pristine environment is far from the truth, her impulse to lyricism precipitates her back into these selfsame cliches
|K(>
making her sound, at
MMIMINI !» W I T H I VI'I " HITMt
times, like a voiceover for a Discovery Channel p r o g r a m , or like a female A t t e n b o r o u g h uttering platitudes about "teeming life" on a "shrinking planet." T o single out A c k e r m a n for criticism is no d o u b t unfair and possibly smacks o f self-righteousness; her w o r k is better seen as an example o f an identifiable genre. N a t u r e writing, like travel writing at large, involves the negotiation o f cliches—to call it platitudi nous is, in this respect, surely to miss the point. A t its best, nature/ travel writing is able to redeploy its chosen cliches in the service o f a t h o r o u g h g o i n g cultural critique. T h e problem, though, is that this cri tique m a y itself acquire c o m m o d i t y status- it m a y be appropriated b y and remodeled for a materialistic culture. In this sense, b o o k s like A c k erman's are faced with an irresolvable contradiction: as "nature stud ies," they objectify—naturalize—the phenomena they investigate, turning their celebrations o f life into collections o f natural-history curios, and into exotic objects o f consumption in the overdeveloped world. D a v i d Q u a m m e n ' s The Song of the Dodo faces a similar dilemma, but the strategies it adopts to counteract it are very different from those o f A c k e r m a n . F o r one thing, Q u a m m e n is by no means averse to rehearsing academic arguments: a large part o f his weighty b o o k is given over to the intellectual sparring that has historically surrounded (and still surrounds) the evolution debate. F o r another, he has a thesis to present, evident from the first pages, where he sets out his theory o f the partitioning o f the planet into isolated island zones that place their resident flora and fauna increasingly at risk. A n d for a third, his w o r k is clearly aimed at a different, more specialized audience; with its close attention to details, its precise definitions, its careful lists and copious bibliography, The Song of the Dodo is much less like The Rarest of the Rare than like L o p e z ' s Arctic Dreams (see chap. 2): a well-written study, geared for a lay readership but hardly a mass audience, o f the effects o f environmental change on evolutionary patterns o f habitat and migration. Unlike L o p e z , though, Q u a m m e n is content to play the twin roles o f scientist and adventurer; as he says, referring to pioneers of b i o g e o g r a p h y like Alfred W a l l a c e (a hero, incidentally, to O ' H a n lon, and m u c h cited in O ' H a n l o n ' s b o o k s ; see chap. 2): " B i o g e o g r a p h y was always romantic, physically challenging, enlivened by adventur ous field trips to exotic locales" (426). Q u a m m e n sees himself as a lat ter-day Wallace, following in the footsteps o f his famous predecessor, venturing into areas that, although long since "discovered," remain coin Lively remote. (Examples here include the A r u Islands in the M a l a y POVl'MOIII'ltN ITINI'.HAHIKS
l.X'7
archipelago, or the better-known but still isolated islands o f M a d a g a s car and Tasmania.) Q u a m m e n ' s b o o k accordingly maintains a balance between scientific commentary and g u n g h o adventure, as its writer alternates between the nitpicking details o f his treatise and his ram bunctious expeditions, often led by equally flamboyant guides. L i k e other nature writers operating at the fringe o f the conven tional picaresque travel narrative, Q u a m m e n uses interludes o f adven ture to offset, as well as to illustrate, his serious study. T h u s , w e find him at one point narrowly escaping from the clutches o f a carnivorous K o m o d o dragon or, at others, in anxious nocturnal pursuit of the G u a m tree-snake and the (probably extinct) T a s m a n i a n tiger. Q u a m men's escapades are sensationalist e n o u g h to capture the interest o f even the most distracted readers without c o m p r o m i s i n g the intellectual rigor o f his broader evolutionist argument. This argument sees "disap pearance" as a possible prelude to extinction—the likely result o f a series of biogeographical factors including population size and geo graphical distribution, as well as of a w h o l e panoply o f frequently avoidable man-made causes. Q u a m m e n is well aware o f the shock appeal o f disappearance: an appeal that, for example, has turned the obscure (Mauritian) d o d o into an unforgettable subject o f literary myth. H e is also aware o f the pitfalls surrounding the rhetoric o f dis appearance: in a brief excursus, for instance, on the reputedly vanished T a s m a n i a n A b o r i g i n e s , he makes the conventional but valid point that their descendants are still with us, and that their culture, although dec imated by a history o f European depredation, has adapted like any other to meet different environmental needs. By showing the suscepti bility o f myths o f disappearance to ideological manipulation—by iron ically exploring the authoritarian temptation to rescue "threatened" creatures and cultures, or to resuscitate "vanished" o n e s — Q u a m m e n is able to fend off the argument that seems to m a k e him, and his work, vulnerable: that they are both exploiting the current v o g u e for cau tionary parables o f depletion at a time when rarity and extinction have themselves become consumer items. Narratives o f disappearance such as Q u a m m e n ' s and A c k e r m a n ' s focus on a threatened planet w h o s e diversity is dwindling and whose ecosystems are in decay. A s is evident in A c k e r m a n ' s b o o k (if not in Q u a m m e n ' s ) , the mystical tenor o f the writing counteracts the g l o o m i ness o f its subject, turning what might potentially be an elegy for mori bund nature into a eulogy o f nature's capacity to regenerate itself, even at high risk. T h i s optimism in (he face of disaster is reminiscent o f the |UK
1 1 n in r,
i.-,
M I N I
i v I'l'WKITHIW
N e w A g e : a smorgasbord o f beliefs and philosophies, often d r a w n from mystical traditions, which aim to turn the apocalyptic fear o f material cataclysm into the clarion call for a j o y o u s spiritual renais sance at the millennium. ? T h e N e w A g e encompasses a dizzying vari ety o f "therapeutic" media, from protective crystals, self-help manuals, and arcane treatises on angelic bodies to in-depth studies o f holistic medicine and the complex structures o f N a t i v e belief. T r a v e l — o n m a n y levels—is integral to the N e w A g e ethos, as is a concern for the environment, usually considered in "alternative" (i.e., non-Western) spiritual terms. N e w A g e spiritual odysseys, with ecological ramifica tions, are a m o n g the most popular—and idiosyncratic—of c o n t e m p o rary travel narratives. Unsurprisingly, the sixties, with its developed counterculture, has been the " b o o m " decade so far for the production of such narratives. (Probably the best k n o w n a m o n g these are the cult " D o n J u a n " b o o k s o f the anthropologist C a r l o s C a s t a n e d a , w h o s e recycled primitivist wisdoms, inspired by an impressive array o f hallu cinogens, were to prove irresistible to their mostly youthful, often dis affected, Western readers.) T h e nineties, however, with the millen nium at hand, is not far behind; for N e w A g e products proliferate—the merchandise o f the Earth's salvation—in a postmodern age that "extends the p o w e r o f the market over the whole range o f cultural pro d u c t i o n " ( H a r v e y 62). Such products, it might be said uncharitably, provide a series o f "quick fixes" for an alternative-seeking populace reacting against its o w n materialism in material ways. W h a t is evident, al any rate, is that the N e w A g e is more than just a "transformative" philosophy; it is a full-blown industry, catering to a g r o w i n g number o f consumers, which markets "alternative" spirituality in a variety o f appealing forms. 1
18
19
Hence the staggering w o r l d w i d e success of one o f the more recent N e w A g e vehicles, M a r i o M o r g a n ' s controversial Australian-based Iravelogue Mutant Message Down Under (1994). M o r g a n ' s b o o k , a massive best-seller in her h o m e country, the United States, aroused a storm o f protest after its m u c h fanfared publication in 1994. A t the eye of the storm was M o r g a n ' s contention, within the framework o f a fictionalized account o f her travels in Australia, that she was "let i n t o " the tribal secrets o f the A b o r i g i n e s a m o n g w h o m she traveled, but that in order to protect these secrets she could not reveal the name o f the tribe. Playing up to this transparent fiction-within-a-fiction, M o r g a n proceeded to regale A m e r i c a n audiences with further stories o f her "induction," and was astonishingly touted for a while as a genuine I'OM
Mul.mitN
I T IN I'Hh t t l U S
iXt)
N e w A g e savior figure: the "messenger d o w n under," chosen b y her A b o r i g i n a l kinsmen, spreading spiritual enlightenment to the " M u t a n t s " — t h e materially clouded folks b a c k home. Here, in M o r gan's narrative, is the culminating m o m e n t o f her selection: Y o u h a v e b e e n c h o s e n [said t h e E l d e r ] a s o u r M u t a n t m e s s e n g e r t o tell y o u r k i n d w e a r e g o i n g . W e a r e l e a v i n g M o t h e r E a r t h t o y o u . W e p r a y y o u w i l l s e e w h a t y o u r w a y o f l i f e is d o i n g t o t h e w a t e r , t h e a n i mals, the air, a n d t o each other. W e p r a y y o u will find a solution t o y o u r p r o b l e m s w i t h o u t d e s t r o y i n g this w o r l d . T h e r e are M u t a n t s o n the edge o f regaining their individual spirit o f true beingness. W i t h e n o u g h f o c u s , t h e r e is t i m e t o r e v e r s e t h e d e s t r u c t i o n o n t h e p l a n e t , b u t w e c a n n o l o n g e r h e l p y o u . O u r t i m e is u p . A l r e a d y t h e r a i n p a t t e r n h a s b e e n c h a n g e d , t h e h e a t is i n c r e a s e d , a n d w e h a v e s e e n y e a r s o f plant a n d a n i m a l r e p r o d u c t i o n lessened. W e c a n n o longer p r o v i d e h u m a n f o r m s f o r spirits t o inhabit because there will s o o n b e n o m o r e w a t e r o r f o o d l e f t h e r e i n t h e d e s e r t . (148)
W h i l e the o r a c u l a r tone o f the p a s s a g e is l a u g h a b l e , the a p p r o priation o f A b o r i g i n a l spiritual w i s d o m — h o w e v e r m i s c h i e v o u s l y intended—is not. M o r g a n risks being taken here for a n o t h e r o f the N e w A g e ' s fraudulent gurus, exhibiting disrespect for the p e o p l e w h o s e factitious "tribal w i s d o m " she retails so shamelessly, a n d e x p l o i t i n g the gullibility o f her unsuspecting audience. A n o t h e r reading is possible, t h o u g h , w h i c h m i g h t help put Mutant Message in perspective. T h i s reading, e m p h a s i z i n g the status o f M o r g a n ' s text as a travel narrative, d r a w s attention t o a genre that historically j u g gles " f a c t " and m y t h . T r a v e l writers are often h o a x e r s ( a l t h o u g h very few are mistaken for gurus); and in this sense, M o r g a n ' s sleight o f h a n d m i g h t be seen in a less inquisitorial light. N o t w i t h s t a n d i n g , M o r g a n ' s text certainly rings b o g u s as a N e w A g e narrative o f spiri tual a w a k e n i n g . T a k i n g rhetorical a d v a n t a g e o f the " d i s a p p e a r a n c e " o f the A u s t r a l i a n A b o r i g i n e s — n e e d l e s s to say, M o r g a n ' s critics h a v e corrected her, less than kindly, on that p o i n t — M o r g a n uses their " i n h e r i t a n c e " for a w o r l d w i d e spiritual transformation: a revelation, n o t h i n g less, that the w o r l d exists in a state o f Oneness, and that this Oneness must be intuited and protected for the sake o f all. M o r g a n ' s m y s t i c i s m is a r g u a b l y more opportunistic, and certainly less in formed than, say, V a n der Post's or A c k e r m a n ' s ; but it is not w h o l l y unrelated to these writers' recuperative projects, which either seek to m a k e capital out o f a "timeless" Native w i s d o m , even as they
lUO
TiMlHi:. 1 • Willi
I v I'llWIUTITtS
c o n s i g n N a t i v e peoples to a p r e m a t u r e extinction ( V a n der P o s t ) , or w h i c h take a r o m a n t i c v i e w o f interdependence o n the planet, using that v i e w to l y r i c i z e — a n d reify—the "lost i n n o c e n c e " o f e n d a n g e r e d species ( A c k e r m a n ) . T h e c o n n e c t i o n s b e t w e e n these otherwise highly disparate cultural p r o d u c t s indicate the moral righteousness that is a r g u a b l y c o m m o n to their (sub)genre. T h e y also suggest that N e w A g e p o p u l i s m m a y underscore very different kinds o f nature/ travel writing, and that travel w r i t i n g — a t least o f the m o r e serious, e n v i r o n m e n t a l l y c o n s c i o u s v a r i e t y — h a s b e c o m e a v a l u a b l e source for the m a r k e t i n g o f N e w A g e m y t h s (the healing o f the Earth; the nostalgia for m o r e authentic, nonmaterialistic w a y s o f life; the recovery o f wholeness in the face o f g l o b a l extinction). F i n a l l y , they hint, o n c e a g a i n , at the c o n t r a d i c t i o n s in c o n t e m p o r a r y W e s t e r n nature/travel writing, c o n t r a d i c t i o n s in part attributable to the belatedness o f p o s t m o d e r n i t y : that in celebrating threatened nature, it observes the p r o d u c t s o f the W e s t ' s destructiveness; and that in recuperating "timeless" peoples and cultures, it obscures the W e s t ' s part in their decline. These contradictions are also contained, o f course, in the Zeitgeist of the N e w A g e , and some younger, k n o w i n g travel writers have already started exploiting them to satirical effect. O n e such satirical travelogue is Melanie M c G r a t h ' s Motel Nirvana: Dreaming of the New Age in the American Desert (1995). Motel Nirvana takes its y o u n g author to the A r i z o n a and N e w M e x i c o desert in search o f N e w A g e eccentricities—and she finds them in abundance. T h e charlatan gurus and crackpot psychics M c G r a t h encounters on her travels are s y m p t o matic o f a N e w A g e culture taken to its absurd limits. Whether she is describing tree-hugging hippies in latter-day communes in the forest or smarmy televangelists ministering to their flocks on their luxurious estates, M c G r a t h has a keen eye and ear for pseudomystical entrepreneurship and spiritual fakery, and for the confused ideals and values that underlie N e w A g e r s ' soulful quests. In a typically caustic sequence, M c G r a t h recounts the days she spends at a N e w A g e retreat—the L a m a F o u n d a t i o n — h i g h up in the Sangre de Christo mountains o f N e w M e x i c o . A ritual event at the foundation is the "consensus" o f its raggle-taggle members: an open meeting at which decisions concerning the running o f the retreat are made. A m a n "in a T-shirt bearing the imperative ' G e t Naked!' opens the meeting and everyone looks up and smiles oversized smiles, which makes me w o n -
l'i i N T M O O I ' H N
I I INIHHAUII'.S
191
der if w e all use the same muscles because every time 1 try to emulate them, it hurts" (177-78). T h e meeting soon turns into yet another opportunity for bonding: G e t N a k e d a n n o u n c e s t h a t i t is t i m e f o r t h e c o n s e n s u s , s o p l e a s e t o close o u r eyes a n d d e l v e i n t o o u r i n n e r m o s t selves. W e j o i n h a n d s a n d close o u r eyes a n d so I i m a g i n e w e l o o k into o u r hearts. A f t e r a l o n g pause G e t N a k e d whispers "yesss" and the w o m a n next t o h i m whis p e r s " y e s s s " a n d w h e n it c o m e s r o u n d t o m y t u r n I w h i s p e r " y e s s s " a n d s o it g o e s o n . T h e g r o u p r e s u m e s its m a m m o t h s m i l i n g a n d I w o n d e r i f it's j u s t m e w h o h a s n ' t t h e l e a s t i d e a w h a t a l l t h e y e s s s e s a r e i n t e n d e d t o a d d u p t o . (178)
In example after hilarious example, M c G r a t h suggests that the N e w A g e r s ' heartfelt confessions and passionate camaraderie only serve to reconfirm a creed o f frantic selfishness: T u r n e d in u p o n themselves, the outside w o r l d can seem uninteresting a n d p r o f a n e , e v e n i r r e l e v a n t , t o N e w A g e r s . F a i t h is n o l o n g e r a m a t ter o f trust, s o m e t h i n g t o w h i c h o n e m u s t a b a n d o n oneself, b u t a n e x e r c i s e i n i n t r o s p e c t i o n , w h o s e o u t e r e x p r e s s i o n is s i n c e r i t y .
Hence
the N e w A g e preoccupation with "authentic experience," and with sincerely-expressed e m o t i o n , f o r t o N e w A g e r s these a r e b o t h a p r o t e s t against p o s t - m o d e r n life a n d a visible m a n i f e s t a t i o n o f the sacredness within. T h e tear a n d the h u g are the sacraments o f N e w A g e r i t u a l . (179-80)
New
A g e r s ' spiritual quests are at once reactions against p o s t m o d e r n
material lifestyles and effects o f the p o s t m o d e r n commodification o f spirituality.
20
M c G r a t h recognizes this: the N e w A g e , she concludes
acerbically, is "the consumer culture's answer to spirituality. It takes w h a t serves it and leaves the rest" (182). She is astute e n o u g h to recog nize, also, that travel b o o k s a b o u t the N e w A g e - including her o w n — risk subscribing to the same consumerist essentialism they debunk. Hence the link M c G r a t h explores between travel writing, N e w A g e soul-searching, and cultural voyeurism: deluded manifestations all o f an essentialized cultural knowledge, or o f the temptation to sift experi ence for the signs o f an essential self. T r a v e l b o o k s , as last-gasp guardians o f the "authenticity" o f lived experience, might seem ideally positioned against the postmodern technologies o f a globalized capi talist culture. But as M c G r a t h points out, "|e]ven as 'first w o r l d ' travel b o o k s and magazines berate the global spread o f K.PCs and C o c a - C o l a and prophesy the death o l ' c u l l u n i l difference, their readership o f cul-
tull
I ( M l N 1ST N W I T H
1 1 I'l'iWHI'l'I'HS
tural voyeurs keeps them in business" (224). C u l t u r a l voyeurism, she continues provocatively, is a "kind o f essentialist p o r n o g r a p h y , " a n d w e i n t h e W e s t a r e e a g e r c o n s u m e r s o f it. W e s a l l y f o r t h , w i t h t h e intention o f b u y i n g u p all experience, t h e n retreat i n the face o f dif ference, like sullen h e r m i t crabs. W e are deflated b ythe p o p u l a r i t y o f B a r t S i m p s o n a m o n g the T h a i s , a n d yet w e are secretly thrilled b y the potency o f o u r cultural exports. W e invest i n "third w o r l d " folk art, b u t n e v e r trouble ourselves greatly w i t h their politics, expecting t o s e n d i n o u r b o y s w h e n t h e local p o p u l a t i o n a c c i d e n t a l l y elects s o m e devil-in-a-turban.
T h e d i s e a s e is s o p r e v a l e n t
that
Pornamerica
[ M c G r a t h ' s ironically c o m m o d i f i e d c o d e - w o r d f o r t h e i c o n o g r a p h y o f A m e r i c a n c o n s u m e r c u l t u r e ] . . . has c o m e not only t o represent the culture o f the U n i t e d States t o A m e r i c a n s a n d foreigners alike, b u t a l s o t h e i d e a o f c o n t e m p o r a n e i t y i t s e l f . T h i s is a s r e d u c t i v e a n d d i s r e g a r d i n g o f A m e r i c a n c u l t u r e a s i t is o f a n y o t h e r . N o n e t h e l e s s w e b e c o m e daily m o r e a n d m o r e accepting o fthe n o t i o n that the essence o f h u m a n i t y lies i n t h e c o n s u m p t i o n , a s p i r a t i o n a l
o r realized, o f
A m e r i c a n i c o n o g r a p h y . P o r n a m e r i c a is b e g i n n i n g t o b e o u r u n i f y i n g spirit. . . . [ A n d w h e n ] t h e C o c a C o l a c o m p a n y can print
billboard
posters w i t h the legend " W e t a u g h t the w o r l d t o sing," t h e n o u r spir i t u a l a l i e n a t i o n is c o m p l e t e . (224-25)
M c G r a t h ' s is a more or less conventional attack on the material arro gance and spiritual impoverishment o f postmodernity; it is enlivened, though, by her awareness that travel writing is not so m u c h a desirable antidote as a symptom o f the voyeuristic essentialism that characterizes the postmodern era. Motel Nirvana, in this context, is both an a n t i - N e w A g e satire and an ironic confession o f travel writing's invest ment in a self-centered N e w A g e culture. In such a culture, alternatives collapse in an interplay o f k n o w i n g paradoxes: spiritual guidance becomes dependent on the latest material products; global conscious ness is intuited at isolated b a c k w o o d s retreats; and travel itself, the very symbol o f travelers' desire to reconnect with nature, transforms itself into an index o f their alienated state. In Motel Nirvana, as in other recent self-ironic explorations o f New A g e therapies, collective environmental awareness is assimilated to the individualistic quest for " h a r m o n y " — f o r an arrival at the dubi ous understanding that the self is balanced between contending psychic forces, and for a realization o f the self's at-homeness with the wider natural w o r l d . M c G r a t h , for all her satirical intent, takes care to show that N e w Agers are by no means ecologically irresponsible that, the eonliiiry, they are hypersensitive to the future o f the 21
I ' O l t t T M O D H H N
I T I N K I U U I I " '
l<)3
planet. (Conservation, as M c G r a t h shows, is very m u c h a N e w A g e issue: a battle between the desire to preserve the natural environment and to insure its availability for restorative trips and transcendent quests.) B u t M c G r a t h also indicates the discrepancy between N e w A g e r s ' search for g l o b a l h a r m o n y and the excessive self-absorption that m a y lead them to neglect, or even ignore, the outside world. Motel Nirvana charts the contradictions in N e w A g e attitudes to the environ ment even as it accepts, in principle, its greater ecological cause. But as an ecotravel b o o k — a s m u c h a product o f the N e w A g e as a diatribe against it—Motel Nirvana is itself conflicted. It recognizes that eco travel, h o w e v e r responsible, is after all a form o f tourism; and that e c o travelers, like other tourists, are inevitably alienated from their envi ronment—an alienation that only increases when they attempt to "reconnect." Environmentally conscious travel narratives tend to reg ister this alienation in a variety o f pastoral, elegiac, and romantically mythicized forms. Y e t as M c G r a t h suggests, the discourse o f environ mental consciousness is, or should be, as m u c h a subject for critical analysis as the environment itself. T o invoke the beauties of nature (the romantic travelogue) or to seek to express natural feelings (the N e w A g e quest) begs the question as to h o w nature a n d the natural are ideologically constructed. A s the late A l e x a n d e r Wilson, a widely respected ecological theorist, reminds us, N a t u r e is a p a r t o f c u l t u r e . . . . O u r e x p e r i e n c e o f t h e n a t u r a l ...
i s a l w a y s m e d i a t e d . I t is a l w a y s s h a p e d b y r h e t o r i c a l
world
constructs
like p h o t o g r a p h y , i n d u s t r y , advertising, a n d aesthetics, as well as b y i n s t i t u t i o n s l i k e r e l i g i o n , t o u r i s m , a n d e d u c a t i o n . . . . T o d a y n a t u r e is filmed,
pictured, written, and talked about everywhere. A st h e mil
lennium approaches, those images a n d discussions a r e increasingly p h r a s e d i n t e r m s o f c r i s i s a n d c a t a s t r o p h e . B u t t h e c u r r e n t c r i s i s is n o t o n l y o u t t h e r e i n t h e e n v i r o n m e n t ; i t is a c r i s i s o f c u l t u r e . . . . T o s p e a k u n c r i t i c a l l y o f t h e n a t u r a l is t o i g n o r e these social q u e s t i o n s . . . . T h o s e w h o wish t o speak o nb e h a l f o fn a t u r e m u s t be especially care f u l . (12)
While ecological theory has stepped u p the pace in interrogating its own ideological biases, nature/travel writing has been slow to d o s o — partly because it remains a site o f escape. In fact, as M a r y Louise Pratt suggests, the invocation o f nature in contemporary nature/travel writ ing might be traced back to the imperial practices o f eighteenth-cen tury European natural history. Natural history, according to Pratt, emerged as an all-encompassing classilicatoiy system that, while
IU.-|
l o l l H I SI S Wl'l
II
I
VI'l.'iWHITl'HS
designed to assert "an urban, lettered, male authority over . . . the planet," did so in a dissociative w a y that made this authority seem benign (Imperial Eyes 38). " C l a i m i n g no transformative potential whatsoever, [natural history] differed sharply from overtly imperial articulations o f conquest, conversion, territorial appropriation, and enslavement. T h e system created . . . a Utopian, innocent vision o f European authority. . . . an anti-conquest" (38-39). W h i l e it w o u l d be excessive, churlish even, to see contemporary nature writing as surrep titiously imperialist—as merely another clandestine form o f E u r o A m e r i c a n domination—it is easy to see h o w some, certainly not all, environmentally conscious travel narratives run the risk o f aestheticizing nature as an object o f wonderment and control. W h i l e the best nature writers—Lopez, Matthiessen, Q u a m m e n — a r g u a b l y function as both moralists and aesthetes (see chap. 2 ) , they are also alert to the dangers o f reifying the wonders o f nature. Other self-conscious travel writers, like M c G r a t h , enter in a similar caveat: that nature and the natural are not pristine essences but mediated concepts; and that these risk b e c o m i n g the ideological pawns o f a consumer-oriented culture that seeks belatedly to rescue, advertise, and sell the very resources that its o w n expansionist imperatives have helped to place at risk. Clearly, consumer culture in the age o f postmodernity has much to gain from the retailing o f endangered species and vanishing worlds. Y e t con sumers, including the readers o f travel b o o k s , also have their part o f the bargain; and while nature writing travel writing as a w h o l e — c e r tainly needs careful critical sifting, it m a y yet teach its readers about the fragility and impermanence o f our world. O n e certainly hopes so; for otherwise, traveler-writers in the not t o o distant future m a y really find themselves, like Levi-Strauss's forlorn m o d e r n traveler, "chasing after the vestiges o f a vanished reality" (43).
l'i
i'M< m i l K N
1iTNlMMIUI'.s
i«n
Postscript Travel Writing at the Millennium
This study began with Evelyn W a u g h ' s a p o c a l y p t i c — i f wry—1946 announcement that the end o f travel writing, and o f real travel itself, w a s drawing nigh. W a u g h ' s announcement, echoed by Levi-Strauss, later elegized by Fussell, w a s very m u c h part o f late—specifically post w a r English—modernist anxiety. Bureaucratic impersonality; progres sive means o f transportation allied to a sophisticated travel infrastruc ture; the monstrous rise o f tourism—all o f these struck W a u g h as symptoms o f the modern (male) adventurer's decline. B u t as w e have seen, W a u g h ' s sense o f crisis- o f belatedness and approaching i m p o tence—was a c o m p o n e n t o f the traveler's anxiety rather than its bale ful diagnosis. Travels multiplied exponentially; and travelogues also flourished, impelled like their g u i d e b o o k counterparts b y an everexpanding tourist industry. W h a t e v e r losses the crisis o f modernism precipitated, travel and its adjunct, the travel b o o k , have hardly been a m o n g them. But w h y not? H o w is it that travel writing has continued to flourish, only gaining in prestige? This study has sought to reflect on these compelling questions. Summarizing those reflections, w e have suggested that contemporary travel writing has answered W a u g h ' s challenge by i n v o k i n g a number o f late-capitalist cultural possibilities. Three o f these are notable, and can be briefly recapitulated here: c o m modification, specialization, and nostalgic parody. T h e inexorable cultural mechanism o f commodification w o r k s symbiotically with textuality: with writing, as with a whole host o f other media forms (film, video, computer graphics, artistic and p h o t o graphic images, and so forth). However strenuously the travel text might attempt, to decommodify travel ity"
to recuperate its "authentic
it presents itself to a world thai the travel industry has played a
107
major role in referencing to the global. T h e global field emerges not so m u c h as a two-dimensional, chartable surface but rather as a set o f interlocking—specialized but also readily accessible -spaces: exotic zones, adventure terrains, hedonistic playgrounds, interactive muse ums, political mazes, " n e w " frontiers, and so on. T h e late-capitalist process o f hypercommodification involves the production o f c o m modities that are commodifying in their turn—such as travel and the travel b o o k . M a n y travel b o o k s , o f course, are little more than adver tising vehicles, commodifying their respective terrains as a means o f selling their second-level products. But even those b o o k s — a n d there are also m a n y — t h a t seek to disrupt the flow o f the market invariably show their complicity with it (as might also be said, o f course, o f this particular study!). This is not a call for dismissal, but rather an invita tion to analysis—an analysis that takes account o f the resilience o f travel texts. Such resilience can be seen, for example, in the appeal to specialized kinds o f travelers. A m o n g those we have identified in this b o o k are (postcolonial) countertravelers, resisting the history and cul tural myths o f Eurocentrism; w o m e n travelers, subverting the male traveler's traditional values and privileges; gay male travelers, either seeking liberatory spaces or flouting heterosexual travel codes; and ecological travelers, reacting against the environmental d a m a g e that they most frequently associate with tourists. Such special-interest groups generally locate themselves in opposition to " c o n v e n t i o n a l " modes o f travel, particularly tourism; this oppositional stance provides a further alibi for travel writing while still depending on its traditions and its—not least, commercial—cachet. Together with the invention o f new models for the traveler (the postmodern n o m a d , the virtual trav eler) and the traveled world (the global village, hyperreality), these guises—or, m o r e accurately, disguises—have produced a spawn o f recent travel narratives while conveying the illusion o f all but endless travel/writing possibilities. In invoking a specialized mission, these writers often appeal to the reader's yearning for a kind of countertravel to assuage their heightened (Western, postmodern) guilt. C o u n t e r travel, o f one sort or another, has certainly energized travel writing and, increasingly, travel theory in the decades since the war. Y e t such oppositional narratives cannot escape being haunted by an array o f hoary tropes and cliches (originary, primitivist, exotic, etc.), any more than they can hope to distill "authentic" encounters from their cornmodified sources. Specialization, the several forms of countertravel, might have been luX
T o O H I S ' l N W lM l I , i'l W j R M ' K H S
expected to put W a u g h ' s old-fashioned travel adventurism out o f busi ness. But it has not done so. O n the contrary, English imperial quest ing—or more or less self-conscious parodies of it—continues to form the basis o f m a n y a recent traveler's tale. In such tales, as w e have seen, a surface gesture to self-parody barely conceals a deep nostalgia for obsolete empires and manly discoverer-explorers. This, it seems, is a subgenre that lends itself to endless replication. M a n y readers continue to find exercises o f even the most basic kind (say, N e w b y ' s ) hilariously funny, as parodies o f any developed genre can often p r o v e to be; but even writers aiming for some more c o m p l e x response than the belly laugh tend to produce moments o f p a r o d y and self-indulgence, per haps to disarm that shifting line k n o w n to all travelers w h o tell: the line where recounted episode sinks into repeated cliche. B u t then repeated cliche sometimes appears to be the stuff o f travel writing, a c o m m o d i t y that cries out to be purchased and consumed and purchased again. It is as if this cycle o f production, consumption, and reproduction were at the genre's core; and as if repetition were the paradoxical gesture that both marked and w a r d e d off the risk o f its demise. It is hardly surprising, then, that W a u g h ' s postwar premonitions about travel and writing are currently being repeated on the edge o f the third millennium. Countless writers—from erudite scholars to sensa tion-seeking journalists—seem to assume that the world is poised at a crucial, e p o c h - m a k i n g moment. This m o m e n t is spatial, as well as tem poral, the product o f b o u n d a r y marking; confusion over where exactly to place the millennial m o m e n t reflects thf shifting borders o f the con temporary political world. Similarly, the times through which we are moving, whether with hope or in despair, carry no essential dates, no definitively demarcating stages. T h e w o r l d ' s millennial m o m e n t cannot be revealed as if b y magic; the w o r l d is less in progress (or in regress) than it is in process. Millennial discourses usually invoke t w o registers. O n the one hand, there is the register o f decisive ends and beginnings: the "end o f history" ( F u k u y a m a ) ; the beginning o f " g l o b a l culture." O n the other, there is the register o f process: o f emergence and rise, o f fall and exhaustion. Both registers, however m u c h they reference postwar/post modern intellectual trends (the paradigm shifts of T h o m a s K u h n , for example, or the world-systems theory o f linmanuel Wallerstein), seem io risk miring the traveler in the well-worn tracks o f Western thought, with past matched against future, East against West, center against margins, atavistic tribalism against progressive globalism, apocalyptic PON I
sen M M
oi')
dread against millennial optimism, and so on. A n d it is within these alltoo-familiar, frequently stereotypical parameters that the current debates surrounding travel and travel writing are often placed. A glance, for instance, at the relevant Guardian Weekly files from the midnineties reveals a startling unanimity a m o n g British travelers, travel writers, and reviewers on the subject o f travel. It might seem inherently silly to ask a question like "where is travel/travel writing going?" B u t asked the question is and, increasingly, answered: "nowhere; don't move; just stay at home." While the general (postmod ern) malaise o f belatedness encourages inertia, the specific forms it takes—political resistance, postcolonial guilt, antitouristic distaste — can produce something stronger: a revulsion from travel. Catherine Bennett, for example, one o f the contributors to the Guardian Weekly debate, seeks an explanation for "[w]hy the right people choose to stay at h o m e " by excoriating the travel industry itself. F o r Bennett, the industry's glossy brochures strike all the right exotic chords, inviting clients, say, to indulge their postimperial fantasies in B u r m a ( M y a n mar) from the insulated space o f the appropriately fabular cruise ship The Road to Mandalay. These brochures say nothing, o f course, about child exploitation, forced labor, the torture o f dissidents, and the perse cution o f opposition leaders in countries like M y a n m a r . A n d although some guidebooks (in trendy series like Lonely Planet) do refer to such unsavory features, they tend to do so in what Bennett calls inappropri ately "jaunty" terms. T h e Lonely Planet " M y a n m a r , " for instance, mentions "hav[ing] heard tell [there] o f a smorgasbord o f dictators, anti-government rebels, guerrillas, insurgents, and assorted malcon tents"—an unruly hodgepodge o f troublemakers that merely makes travel in that country more compelling. Bennett quotes tellingly from the guidebook: "[Myanmar] offers a glimpse o f an incredibly Orwellian society. . . . W e believe—now more than ever—that the positives o f travel to M y a n m a r outweigh the negatives" (qtd. in Bennett 30). Bennett avoids the usual classificatory markers—group/individual tourist, "alternative" backpacker, and so on—that might allow her to justify a superior kind o f travel; instead, she blames the increasing thirst for travel in "difficult and bewildering territory" on the romantic travelogues o f writers like T h u b r o n , C h a t w i n , and R a b a n , correctly if uncharacteristically a c k n o w l e d g i n g the link between "high literary" travel narratives and their " l o w l y " counterparts, the guidebook and the tourist brochure. R o u n d i n g o f f her brief commentary, Bennett offers the caustic judgment lhal "most l nivalin's bring back nothing ilOO
1 ' Hi UlN'tN W I T H ' I V I'll W i l l CIS UN
more useful than tarnished jewellery from their expeditions into the lands o f contrast. It seems like a small justification for . . . callous curiosity" (30). A n d , collapsing travel with travel writing, she goes on to quote from R o b y n D a v i d s o n : "I think perhaps the whole genre needs to close. . . . W e all carry a lot o f cultural prejudices, and I just don't feel comfortable with it" (30). It seems to have escaped Bennett's attention, though, that D a v i d s o n is m a k i n g a different point; for while the former is implying that travelers should e m b a r g o such territories as M y a n m a r and Iran as a form o f political dissociation, the latter is caught up in something quite distinct, a version o f liberal cultural guilt. Bennett's high-handed dismissal o v e r l o o k s the fact that travel to "other" countries opens up, at least potentially, an opportunity for considered self-reflection—it offers a chance, that is, to interrogate and negotiate, if not eliminate, b o t h the traveler's cultural prejudices and those o f the peoples he or she encounters. In her o w n contribution to the Guardian son, respected author o f Tracks
and Desert
Weekly Places
debate, D a v i d (see chap. 3),
recounts h o w she came to see herself as a cultural "invader." D a v i d son's confession falls, however, into some o f the usual traps. She endorses the m y t h that tourists are, by definition, people w h o "impose h o m e environments on a foreign p l a c e " — a s if, by implication, travel ers do not—but she does express some sympathy, that rare c o m m o d ity, for the tourist: "It's a bit m u c h to ask people w h o have three weeks holiday a year to spend it struggling with the confusions o f an alien place, or to put u p with discomforts when what they have earned is rest" (27). Is D a v i d s o n , with perverse magnanimity, doing herself out o f a j o b here? A p p a r e n t l y not, for the solution she offers to the tourist's quandary is the travel book: If literature was a compensation for the problems created by civilisa tion, then perhaps books provide us with a way out. Reading is like taking a journey. It's an entry into another world, another con sciousness. It can satisfy curiosity, educate, excite imagination. There are too many of us: there are too many books. Ergo, stay home and read (27). H o w e v e r frankly D a v i d s o n might disabuse herself o f some o f the recurrent myths o f travel—the one, for instance, that leads the lonely, enterprising,
hardship-enduring
pioneer to w a x self-righteous on
encountering signs o f others' invasions—she leaves herself at the end with the travel writer's standard escape clause: namely, she will c o n I'liS'l'SCIIII'T
201
tinue to travel and to produce further literary j o u r n e y s in order to sat isfy that most insatiable (and most convenient) o f consumers, the "armchair traveler." Ian Sansom, another contributor to the Guardian
Weekly
sympo
sium, produces a similarly double-edged review o f a recent a n t h o l o g y of travel fictions. Such travel stories, S a n s o m suggests, might be taken along as holiday reading, but then again "the mass-market middle b r o w paperback . . . is the modern vade mecum for a j o u r n e y " (28). S a n s o m ' s skepticism about travel targets the figure o f the traveler him self/herself, a figure w h o is always liable to return from trips arrogant and wasted. A t best, according to Sansom, travel is futile, unduly both ersome: Travel, etymologically, is identical with "travail"; they share a com mon root in the Latin trepaliare, meaning "to torture with a trepalium, a three-staked instrument of torture." There's no denying it, travel is a pain—you're better off staying at home, reading. (28) T o n g u e similarly in cheek, V e r o n i c a Horwell, also a reviewer for Guardian
Weekly,
acidly observes that " w e lost an empire and gained
T h e Traveller's B o o k s h o p " (28). Sansom, discounting the potential o f travel to diffuse (and also defuse?) the traveling subject, underlines the "terrible truth that con fronts any travel writer": " y o u can run but y o u can't hide; y o u can pre tend to be someone else, but y o u can't escape yourself; y o u m a y be m o v i n g through a landscape, but it's still y o u w h o ' s m o v i n g through it" (28). A n obvious but still interesting theorem, one that the travel b o o k s o f Paul T h e r o u x might confirm; and one that S a n s o m , as in his comments on travel as travail and pain, raises without inflection, with n o apparent connection to issues o f postcoloniality, postmodernity, or even "post-tourism" (Feifer). Sansom's theorem, nonetheless, usefully suggests the topos o f exhaustion.
There is literal exhaustion, o f course,
where the traveler runs out o f steam or the destination is c r o w d e d out. But an end-of-century and, especially, an end-of-millennium view is more likely to indicate less literal forms o f exhaustion, to point to the w a y s in which travel and travel writing participate in hypertextual exhaustions, where both subject and world are construed as postcolonial, postmodern, "posthistoric." Significantly, though, the
Guardian
Weekly writers cited above (with the possible exception o f Catherine Bennett) take care to reserve a last place for (ravel writing
and thus
for travel writers. Their collective advice is to slay home, because there .'ii,
1
TOUUINTS W l i n
1 1 1' 1 ivtllTt'RM
is nowhere left to g o , because travel is essentially futile, because "cor rect" people do not travel. B u t they then displace travel itself onto the travel b o o k , which apparently—or so they see it—offers a "purer" form o f journey. In this w a y they manage, in spite o f themselves, to reinstate some threadbare distinctions: between the traveler and the tourist, between both o f these and the travel writer. T r a v e l writing's value as c o m m o d i t y rises as that o f travel itself falls. Sallie Tisdale, whose personal perspective on pornography, Talk Dirty to Me: An Intimate Philosophy of Sex (1994), gained her some notoriety, has recently recommended that even travel writers are best off staying home. Tisdale's long piece in Harper's, " N e v e r Let the Locals See Y o u r M a p , " purports to be a review article covering eight travel b o o k s , but the article soon turns into a wide-ranging discussion o f travel writing that canvasses a number o f issues currently under debate. T h e article exhibits ambivalent attitudes. O n the one hand, Tis dale follows Evelyn W a u g h , Paul Fussell, and others in lamenting the exhausted possibility for "genuine" travel and the sad decline o f the travel b o o k : whereas "[t]ravcl b o o k s were [once] shiny with promise— informing and diverting in g o o d measure," now, in contrast, although "travel literature is b o o m i n g , " " g o o d travel writers are few and far between" (66). Since her travelers of promise turn out to include such household favorites as R o b e r t B y r o n and Eric N e w b y , Tisdale alerts us to the link between the notion o f exhaustion and the barely concealed motivation for a g o o d deal o f travel writing: nostalgia. D e c r y i n g a cult of personal idiosyncrasy in the travel writer, Tisdale decides that "[tjoday, true travel writing—the lyrical account o f an adventure marked b y curiosity and courage rather than showmanship—scarcely exists" (67). A s if neither B y r o n nor N e w b y enlists idiosyncrasy or showmanship in his narratives! It is w o r t h noting again (see the intro duction) that this type o f lament for "true" travel writing can be used to promote, rather than discourage, the circulation o f contemporary I ravel narratives. Tisdale falls short, however, o f simply endorsing Fussell, whose second major thesis is the necessity of distinguishing the "true" traveler from "the tourist. W h i l e she agrees that "a particular distinction between travel and tourism m a r k s modern travel writing," it is a fine distinction, and "all travel writers think they k n o w where it is—far from themselves" (67). One function the contemporary travel book serves, then, is lo flatter readers w h o "wish to separate [themselves] from the rabble," t o identify themselves as bona fide travelers, not vul-
gar tourists. In dismantling this distinction, Tisdale makes an inge nious move: she argues that the traveler's professed desire to " p a s s " is fundamentally dishonest, because he or she is also yearning to be noticed, to stand out: "Travelers dissociate themselves from tourists not because tourists are noticed but because they are not. . . . tourists are the least intrusive travelers o f all" (72). F o r Tisdale, it is not tourists w h o give offense but contemporary travel writers, w h o strive (seem ingly in panic) to purvey "authentic" experience. Travel narratives, Tisdale concludes, m a y well discourage not only tourists but also "purer" travelers. M a r r e d though her essay is b y its nostalgic appeal to a history of "true" travel, Tisdale's association o f exhaustion with the commodification o f the dream o f "authentic experience" needs to be taken seriously. It is hardly surprising, in this context, that a number o f recent travel b o o k s m a k e their pitch to the "traveler [who] g r o w s ever more desperate for pure experience, something authentic" (72); nor is it surprising that this ideal traveler is more likely to be a reader. 1
This quest for "authenticity" is, as will be clear b y now, curiously fraught. It seeks to engage further frontiers that are, by definition, exotic. These frontiers are at extremities: o f the map; of the Western, metropolitan world; o f historical regimes; o f fully grounded worldly experience. There is seldom any doubt, though, that the frontier is out there somewhere: as one writer puts it, " b e y o n d the last tollbooth on the last scrap o f potholed pavement at the very end o f the turnpike" (Millman 239). T h e frontier exists in the future, beckoning, enticing, seducing. Y e t it is also chimerical, vanishing, already extinguished as soon as reached (see discussion of the exotic travel zone in chapter 2). Tisdale formulates the c o n u n d r u m neatly: the traveler "wanders the b a c k roads, then writes his b o o k so that everyone will k n o w what mat ters most: not to be the first to see remote lands, but to be the last to see the land remote" (72). T h e traveler-writer attests to h a v i n g been there last, and to having turned out the lights on leaving. A l l the lights but one: the bedside lamp that allows the reader to a c c o m p a n y the author into the always-receding territory o f the exotic. W h i l e there is nothing intrinsically harmful in the transactions between traveler, writer, and reader that satisfy individual fantasies o f discovery, exploration, and exotic experience, the relationship o f such fantasies to collective geo political practices o f control, exploitation, and subjugation is problem atic at best. 2
T h e end-ol'-millennium commentary just examined illustrates the dilemma. This commentary, offered through n series of book reviews UU\
TUl.1 H I N T S W i l l i
I V I ' l i W I U I'l'lHSI
and articles, m a k e s clear that it is the genre itself, rather than the w o r k of any individual writer, that is at stake. F o r , as Tisdale says, travel writing has proliferated as "travel has b u r g e o n e d " within a global, media-driven e c o n o m y (72); as the genre has " b e c o m e . . . a w a y o f life, a w a y o f seeing the w o r l d " (67); and as it has begun to formulate its protocols, to shape a c a n o n for itself. N o d o u b t Paul FusselPs study Abroad has been instrumental in suggesting not only criteria for a seri ous c a n o n but also individual " l a n d m a r k " w o r k s . Evidence of a travelwriting canon, and o f its importance to the marketing o f travel b o o k s as both supplementary to and an alternative form o f travel, can be seen in the recent establishment o f the " P i c a d o r Travel Classics." This is a series that partly announces the classic status—the c a n o n i c i t y — o f its volumes through their hardback covers, their introductions, and their numbering—they are intended to form a library. This canonizing impulse is foreshadowed in Ian Pearson's article in Destinations, the travel section o f the T o r o n t o Globe and Mail ( N o v e m b e r 1992): " A r o u n d the W o r l d in 6,000 Pages. A G u i d e to the Ultimate in A r m chair Journeys." Pearson is unsure whether classic travel writing is literary privilege or salvage mission, its primary function being to "pre serve" the "truly great j o u r n e y s " in b o o k s , even while the "serendipi tous adventure is b e c o m i n g harder and harder to achieve as the jugger naut o f massive tourism levels the planet" (15). But whether they are mandarins o f a superior order or merely last-ditch rescuers, the mainly British, p o s t w a r " c l u b " members all find themselves represented: Byron, Leigh F e r m o r , Lewis, Thesiger, N e w b y , O ' H a n l o n , R a b a n , T h e r o u x , C h a t w i n — a n d one w o m a n , D e r v l a M u r p h y . Literary cre dentials are strengthened b y the inclusion o f such older w o r k s as Kinglake's Eothen (1844), T w a i n ' s The Innocents Abroad (1869), and Stevenson's Travels with a Donkey (1879). Pearson leaves the reader in little d o u b t that travel writing is a consolidated genre, with its acknowledged classics--its founding monuments—and its rapidly expanding membership; and that it has achieved respectability as a (Western) cultural product by m o v i n g off the beaten paths o f travel into the rarefied sphere of " h i g h " literature. Henceforth or so the for mula* runs—every ambitious travel narrative will have to situate itself 111 relation to its literary precusors even before it gets to the starting line. T h e tacit message here is that travel is a primarily textual activity; and that in an age o f depletion and exhaustion, writing is "better" then 3
4
i'Hpei"icncc.
T o publish, or rcliosptxlivuly place, an individual writer's book I'ONTJK'IUN
40
within a named series already gestures toward the canonical by pro claiming the w o r k ' s affiliation with a supposedly identifiable, and already validated, g r o u p . (The Picador Classics imprint assumes both the patent existence o f the "travel classic" and the purchaser's auto matic assent to the v o l u m e s ' "classic" status.) S o m e readers o f travel ogues might be predisposed to favor certain imprints or series, k n o w ing, like seasoned travelers perhaps, what kind o f thing they want. T h e dust jackets and back covers o f travel b o o k s are also witness to the process and function o f c a n o n formation. Y o u can see the " c l u b " at w o r k as established authors write blurbs congratulating one another, or signaling a probationary acceptance for lesser-known writers. O n e of these latter might be hailed as a "true successor" to R e d m o n d O ' H a n l o n , another as a "stylish descendant" o f R o b e r t B y r o n , a third as an "eagle-eyed observer" o f the absurd, like Paul T h e r o u x . T h e blurb industry, an indispensable agent in m o v i n g b o o k s off the store table and into consumers' hands, always risks discrediting itself; after all, some readers are more likely to see blurbs as revealing, not the can did opinions o f experts, but the interested gestures, insider friendships, and mutual puffery o f a handful o f card-carrying club m e m b e r s . A t this point, prestigious literary prizes (like the T h o m a s C o o k A w a r d ) become useful supports, supplying the travel-writing business with a regulated set o f "impartial" endorsements. A s with other elements in the travel-writing infrastructure, such prizes validate not only the sin gle, notable instance but the genre as a whole, which emerges worthily as a stable yet expanding entity. 5
6
The expansion o f travel writing as genre, particularly in the cities for urban audiences, arguably serves to counteract the discourse o f exhaustion. T h e travel sections o f major newspapers, as well as jour nals like Granta and Conde Nast, w o r k continuously to recuperate and reinvigorate travel in a format that blurs the distinction between activ ity and text and (even when it seems to invoke it) between traveler and tourist. These travel sections offer practical instruction for those w h o seek to be "active"; responding to inquiries about equipment for "tramping" N e w Z e a l a n d wildernesses or a b o u t the cheapest w a y to Tibet, they rehearse the travelogue in personal profiles o f particular places or, playing up the travel-as-literature angle, they include brief reviews o f travel b o o k s . A quick survey of the substantial " T r a v e l B o o k s " column in the " T r a v e l " section o f the Toronto Globe and Mail over a period o f some weeks in ii)()(S c o n f i r m s that travel c a n be m a r keted a s replenishment and i n n o v a t i o n , whether in I'uidcbonks, travel
»0<»
TiMlHIS'l N W I T H
I YIM'.WHITI'.MS
narratives, or anthologies o f shorter travel accounts. L a s z l o Buhasz, for example, recommends Jim Haynes's People to People "guides to eastern E u r o p e a n countries," which are "directories o f people . . . w h o speak English or another western European language, are from profes sions ranging from medicine to engineering, and w h o are willing to house, guide or help visitors to their countries"; H a y n e s , effuses Buhasz, "is trying to transform tourists into travellers. G o o d for h i m " (August 14,1996). B u h a s z also notes that Arthur Frommer's New World of Travel "deals with a rapidly g r o w i n g demand for alternative ideas by spirited, intellectually curious travellers tired o f mass-produced v a c a tion p a c k a g e s , " and quotes from F r o m m e r ' s preface: "After 30 years of writing standard travel guide b o o k s , I began to see that most o f the vacation journeys undertaken by A m e r i c a n s were trivial and bland, devoid o f important content, cheaply commercial, and u n w o r t h y o f our better instincts and ideals" ( M a r c h 23, 1996). A n t h o l o g i e s , too, seek to recuperate and reinvigorate travel. B u h a s z c o m m e n d s the Trav elers' Tales series (edited b y James O ' R e i l l y and L a r r y H a b e g g e r ) for their "articulate explanation o f the difference between travel guides and travel literature," a difference apparently m a r k e d b y the latter's emphasis on experience and story. A c c o r d i n g to O ' R e i l l y and H a b e g ger, travelers need to be prepared, "with feelings and fears, hopes and dreams, goals. . . . N o t h i n g can replace listening to the experience o f others, to the w a r stories that come out after a few drinks, to the mem ories that linger and beguile" (February 10, 1996). T h e Travelers' Tales editors clearly throw their pitch to those w h o plan to use travel texts as an overture to travel, as a preparation for the real thing. A s suggested throughout this study, neither travel itself nor the travel b o o k exists in isolation; in the symbiosis between them, it is less a matter o f seeing one as "superior" than o f seeing each as a supple ment to the other: the travel account as a c o m p a n i o n to actual travel, the travel itinerary as supplementary to its texts. Eric K o r n . in a recent TLS article, suggests that supplementarity can take positions o f "before." "after," and "instead": went to Marrakech because I read The Alleys of Marrakech; I went to Cannery Row because I read Cannery Row. . . . On the other hand I returned from Haiti late in Papa Doc's time, read The Comedians and discovered . . . just where I'd been, who had been sitting in my chair, sleeping in my bed, floating in my swimming-pool. In retro spect (the best way to enjoy abroad), a deeper tint of danger coloured my rather placid trip. . . . On the third hand, 1 didn't go to Borneo I ' O N T N t H 11' I
207
. . . a n d h a v e given the Y a n o m a m i a wide berth, because I read R e d m o n d O ' H a n l o n . (36)
V a r i o u s mechanisms continue to enforce a distinction between actual, degraded, "post-touristic" travel and "purer" forms o f travel, not o f course as a means o f actively discouraging travel, but rather o f replenishing it b y appealing to untainted motivations and higher ideals. T h e material continuity between higher and lower forms o f travel is evident in most bookstores, where the shelves filled with travel guides are adjacent to those, almost as many, carrying travelogues. The L o n e l y Planet imprint, a m o n g others, has begun to exploit this overlap by establishing a sister series, L o n e l y Planet Journeys, which converts the raw material o f travel guides into more "literary" travel accounts. This travelogue series, like its g u i d e b o o k counterpart, is clearly aimed at the lifestyle and mindset o f self-styled "offbeat" trav elers and "irreverent" backpackers. T h e following summary, for instance, is taken from the cover o f the first in the series, Sean C o n don's Sean and David's Long Drive (1996): S e a n C o n d o n is y o u n g , u r b a n a n d a c o n n o i s s e u r o f h a i r - w a x . H e can't drive, a n d he doesn't really travel well. S o w h e n S e a n a n d his f r i e n d set o u t t o e x p l o r e A u s t r a l i a i n a d u c k e g g b l u e 1966 F o r d F a l c o n , t h e r e s u l t is a d e c i d e d l y o f f b e a t l o o k a t l i f e o n t h e r o a d . O v e r 14,000 d e a t h - d e f y i n g k i l o m e t e r s , o u r h e r o e s c h e c k o u t t h e re-runs o n T V , get f a b u l o u s l y d r u n k , listen t o N e i l Y o u n g a n d w o n d e r w h y t h e y ever left h o m e . Sean and David's
Long Drive m i x e s s h a r p i n s i g h t s w i t h d e a d p a n
h u m o u r a n d o u t r i g h t lies. C r a n k it u p a n d r e a d i t o u t l o u d .
A n o t h e r in the series, A n n i e Caulfield's Kingdom of the Film Stars (1997), takes the reader (according to a brief newspaper notice) "through a jolly r o m p through contemporary Jordan. A s y o u ' d expect from a long-time television comedy-script writer . . . , Caullield always sees the funny side o f things. A n d there's plenty to laugh at: struggling with her toilette in the middle o f the Jordanian desert, dealing with the ' M a r l b o r o B o y s ' and their horses at the foot o f the ruins at Petra." Aficionados o f the popular L o n e l y Planet " T r a v e l Survival K i t " series will be familiar with the travelogues' jocular, wryly self-ingratiating tone. But the publishers also acknowledge a more significant point, namely that the transparent "fictions" o f travelogues are closely inter twined with the g u i d e b o o k ' s hard "Tacts." '('heir spaces overlap; you can stay home with the Lonely Planet " A u s t r a l i a " kit or you can "over-
itoH
' l o n k r 1 ' . w r i •• 1 VIM V, I;I I i\m
l a n d " with Sean and D a v i d — b o t h b o o k s serve as facilitators o f the actual process o f travel while locating the traveler fair and within a set o f (Western) travel m y t h s .
square
7
Clearly, the culture and media industries are continuing to m o b i lize travel in its widest sense, b o t h activating and responding to main stream,
overwhelmingly metropolitan
avidity to
experience—or,
rather, purchase—the greatest range o f g l o b a l commodities. A m o n g those commodities are, o f course, the ideologies and collective fan tasies o f the West, in particular A m e r i c a , Britain, the white diaspora in C a n a d a , Australia, N e w Z e a l a n d , and South Africa, parts o f E u r o p e and, increasingly—though in a different form—the countries o f the Pacific R i m . A s the millennium approaches, the fetishizing o f the m o m e n t in terms o f "end o f and " d a w n of," o f (pessimistic) a p o c a lypticism and (optimistic) global progress, is ubiquitous. Some travel writing, particularly the strand that crosses over into political journal ism, seems well attuned to geopolitical hysteria, the obverse o f global optimism. T h e w o r k o f the A m e r i c a n writer R o b e r t D . K a p l a n — Balkan
Ghosts
(1993), " T h e C o m i n g A n a r c h y " (1994), and,
most
recently, The Ends of the Earth: A Journey at the Dawn of the 20th Cen tury (1996)—is w o r t h considering at some length here because o f the eagerness with which m a n y readers have embraced his vision o f the Balkans and the Third W o r l d . A blurb for the paperback edition acclaims The Ends of the Earth as " a terrifying j o u r n e y around w h a t is both the rim and the center o f the w o r l d , " a j o u r n e y that "describes, in haunting detail, the abyss on which so m u c h o f the world teeters." Where K a p l a n ' s B a l k a n chronicle had specified a local instance o f breakdown, and his Atlantic
Monthly
article had generalized the ter
rain and deepened the despair, the last item in his trilogy fits in some where between, with the j o u r n e y m o v i n g from Africa through Central Asia and ending up in the Indian subcontinent and Indochina, and with K a p l a n attempting to balance a sense o f the abyss with tentative hope. Overall though, K a p l a n ' s w o r k evokes " T h e Second C o m i n g " in ils remorseless apocalyptic g l o o m , and it seems likely that the title o f his article " T h e C o m i n g A n a r c h y " was intended to stir an echo o f Y e a r ' s famously doom-laden poem. K a p l a n himself labels The Ends of the Earth a "travel b o o k , " "a prcmodern general!st's book that mixes history a n d other subjects in with travel," a n d is written "in the style o f John Gunther, not P a u l T h e r o u x " (preface, n.p.). Using G u n t h e r and T h e r o u x to represent opposing extremes o f the liavcl book s e e m s a I first to b e a useful m o v e : |M >•, 1
: 1 111 (• 1
1
.11
Gunther's "Inside..." series establishes these "insides" through an accu mulation o f facts and statistics, largely erasing any sense o f a traveling, perceiving subject, whereas T h e r o u x foregrounds a subject w h o consti tutes place precisely through his unstable "outsider" presence. But the distinction is hardly that simple, and K a p l a n ' s narrative, far from lock ing on factual details, floats between alternative means o f recording and registering cultural difference. A t one point, K a p l a n claims that, to opti mize knowledge o f the "other," the traveler should g o on foot: In a n air-conditioned medium
four-wheel-drive T o y o t a L a n d
through which
senior diplomats
Cruiser—the
a n d top Western
relief
officials o f t e n e n c o u n t e r A f r i c a — s u s p e n d e d h i g h a b o v e the r o a d a n d l o o k i n g o u t t h r o u g h closed w i n d o w s , y o u r forehead a n d u n d e r a r m s comfortably dry, y o u m a y learn something about Africa. Traveling in a c r o w d e d p u b l i c b u s , flesh p r e s s e d u p o n w e t , s o u r flesh, y o u l e a r n m o r e ; a n d in a " b u s h t a x i , " o r " m a m m y w a g o n , " w h e r e there are n o t e v e n w i n d o w s , y o u l e a r n e v e n m o r e s t i l l . B u t i t is o n f o o t t h a t y o u learn t h e m o s t . Y o u a r e o n t h e g r o u n d , o n t h e s a m e level
with
Africans rather than looking d o w n at them. Y o u aren o longer pro tected b y speed o r air-conditioning
o r t h i c k glass. T h e s w e a t p o u r s
f r o m y o u , a n d y o u r s h i r t s t i c k s t o y o u r b o d y . T h i s is h o w y o u l e a r n . (25)
K a p l a n ' s apparent aim is to m o v e through Africa on the level, present ing a sequence o f experiential encounters whose "authenticity" is guar anteed by the rejection o f insulating media (speed, w i n d o w s , air condi tioning, etc.). Y e t this smacks (as it so often does in this type o f narrative) o f disingenuousness; as a seasoned A m e r i c a n journalist m o v i n g freely on the international circuit, K a p l a n frequently capital izes on reliable and expensive transport, on comfortable, protected lodging and, especially, on the kind o f personal contacts only available to the privileged Westerner. In spite o f distancing himself from the kind o f self-absorbed travel associated with T h e r o u x , K a p l a n , in his account, m a k e s use o f several similar materials and techniques. F o r example, like T h e r o u x , K a p l a n w o r k s u p the personal encounter or interview. W h e n a m a n approaches him on the road, inviting recognition, K a p l a n has to think hard before he recalls having met him the previous day. K a p l a n remembers that the man, seeing him without change, had offered to pay for his C o k e : " T h o u g h I had thanked him profusely only yester day, today he was at first glance just another black face, another o f my statistics" (26). IIore, however, a major d i f f e r e n c e between T h e r o u x in
M i n i a t i s w i 111 i v I T w M T l i t k
and K a p l a n emerges, for where the former w o u l d likely disarm the episode of sentimental potential, the latter m a k e s it stand, somewhat improbably, for universal prospects: " T o see individuals, I realized, was to see possibilities and, thus, m o r e hopeful scenarios" (26). K a p l a n also shares with T h e r o u x — a n d with a great m a n y other contemporary travel writers—an impulse to keep (inter)textual layers between himself and w h a t he is reporting. K a p l a n ' s citations range from C . P. C a v a f y to the L o n e l y Planet series, from T h o m a s M a l t h u s to T h o m a s M a n n , from Joseph C o n r a d to Barry L o p e z , from R i c h a r d 8
Burton to Bruce C h a t w i n . It seems as if K a p l a n has less confidence in what observation and interaction can achieve than his comments about traveling on foot might suggest. H e confesses, at any rate, that he "read a l o t " in preparation for his various tours (95). A n d then, sur prisingly, he enlists such reading to distance himself from tourists: "In an age o f mass tourism, adventure becomes increasingly an inner mat ter, where reading can transport y o u to places that others only a few feet a w a y will never see" (96). It also suggests the achievement o f an existential authenticity: " T h e more I read about a place and about issues that affect it, the more I feel I a m traveling a l o n e " (95). While K a p l a n ' s dense allusiveness and cultivated sensitivity align his travel with T h e r o u x ' s , his anxiety to assign causes to the various regional malaises he witnesses links his w o r k more closely with G u n ther's.
9
Here, encounter narrative yields to data and written history.
But neither o f these can satisfy K a p l a n ' s relentless search for causes, and his narrative returns addictively to—-largely undeveloped—gen eral theories. Africa is trapped in atavism ( K a p l a n entitles the section, " B a c k to the D a w n ? " ) and enervation. " N a t u r e , " K a p l a n observes, "appeared far too prolific in this heat, and m u c h o f w h a t she created spoiled q u i c k l y " (19). Africa is a place o f "passivity, fatalistic and defeated" (24), racked by overpopulation and disease, and lost in a kind o f "premodern formlessness" (45). Even climate and geography point to violence and atrophy: " W h e n you read the history of Sierra Leone y o u cannot help but realize h o w m u c h the past was decreed by geography and climate" (48). T h e travel account swerves into disaster journalism. " C a u s e s " become t o o "natural" ( " b l o o d , " "heat," "tribal ism," "the forest") or too pseudoscientific (overpopulation, disease, boundary problems) lo engage. Such "causes" w o r k against the pro duction
of
useful
analysis.
The
constant
deployment
of
vivid
metaphor, in which such nulural phenomena as seeds, eruptions, and conllagiations pioduce cultural effects, occludes both historical terms
M • I '.I llll' I
II
and the consideration o f economics and politics: those o f the states and territories themselves, and those o f powerful international interests and institutions. In "explaining" w h a t he sees in the Third W o r l d , K a p l a n returns obsessively to a key formula. " G e o g r a p h y is destiny" (130) is not only K a p l a n ' s personal m o t t o ; it is also a kind o f shorthand for Western traveler-observers w h o s e accounts o f the countries through w h i c h they m o v e substitute easy myths for hard analysis. K a p l a n ' s speculations a b o u t Iran in The Ends of the Earth are symptomatic: [ W ] e r e m o r e o f I r a n — r a t h e r t h a n j u s t its n o r t h a n d n o r t h w e s t b o r d e r p r o v i n c e s — g r a c e d b y t h e moist a n dm o d e r a t i n g influences o ft h e Caspian, then perhaps the history a n d character o f the Iranian people w o u l d h a v e b e e n v e r y different, a n d t h e t r a n s f o r m a t i o n o f a n air p l a n e c a b i n i n t o a v e r i t a b l e m o s q u e w o u l d n e v e r h a v e o c c u r r e d . (176)
But g e o g r a p h y ' s edicts are complicated by other universalizing struc tures, which lead K a p l a n in turn to a number o f portentous statements and questions: " T h e story o f man is the story o f n o m a d i s m " (130); "rural poverty is age-old and consistent with an ever-turning planet" (107); and, most egregiously perhaps, "the condition o f a country's public toilets—or the lack o f them—says something about its progress t o w a r d civil society" (274)! O n the other hand, as K a p l a n admits, " N o one can foresee the precise direction o f history, and n o nation and peo ple is safe from its w r a t h " (438). H a r m o n i z i n g such a c a c o p h o n y o f explanation is n o easy matter. W h a t is the relation between the human "story o f n o m a d i s m " and "progress t o w a r d civil society"? H o w can w e protect "a country's public toilets" from the wrathful j u d g m e n t o f an implacable history? In F r e e t o w n , K a p l a n says, "I wished I had been younger and more naive, and that I w a s not addicted to political analy sis" (43). Y e t it is precisely firm political analysis, from any perspective, that seems to be missing, as K a p l a n ' s text repeatedly entraps itself in a kind o f apocalyptic banality: T h e e n d was nigh in the failed battle, f o u g h t valiantly b y the liberal W e s t , t o equalize cultures a r o u n d the w o r l d . T h e differences between s o m e cultures a n d others (regarding the ability t o p r o d u c e exportable material wealth) appeared to be growing rather than
diminishing.
(54) Platitudes like these render statements such as " A f r i c a . . . has to be confronted" (25) opaque to the point o f futility. K a p l a n ' s title phrase, "the ends o f the earth," is oddly anachronisI'OUIttSl
w i 1 11 1 s H ' W K I T H K S
tic, belying the awareness he otherwise shows o f global shrinkage; while the subtitle, " a j o u r n e y at the d a w n o f the 21st century," hints at an exploration o f newness that flies in the face o f the text's tired stereo types and despair at the possibility o f prediction. K a p l a n ' s stated aim is to " m a p the future, perhaps the 'deep future,' by ignoring w h a t was legally and officially there and, instead, touching, feeling, and smelling w h a t was really there" (6); but his conclusion is that "the effect o f cul ture was more o f a mystery to me near the end o f m y planetary journey than at the beginning" (425). K a p l a n ' s j o u r n e y o f political travel ends in all kinds o f exhaustion: the exhaustion o f the traveler, o f the terrains and cultures he has traversed, o f the textual effects o f travel—and, per haps, o f the reader. Such a journey might perhaps more accurately be described as a "midnight" (of the twentieth century) than as a " d a w n " (of the twenty-first). 10
T h e p r o g r a m m e d travel account, insofar as it fulfills a d o c u m e n tary function, offers to interrogate contemporary global issues in a variety o f contexts: economic, geographical, historical, sociological. It undertakes its p r o g r a m via a mixed route o f travel experience, onsite reportage, and wide-ranging textual reference. A tall order; and it is perhaps unfair to pass harsh j u d g m e n t on K a p l a n ' s b o o k , probably the most ambitious and broadly defined o f a clutch o f popular "political" travelogues sparked by the end o f the C o l d W a r , the dissolution o f the U . S . S . R . , a g r o w i n g fear o f the Islamic East, and the end o f the twen tieth century. T h e Western commentators iji these accounts most fre quently find their encounters confirming ideological biases and prescripted knowledge, and many o f them find it hard to negotiate the spaces between w h a t K a p l a n calls T h e r o u x - and Gunther-type travel. It might well seem from K a p l a n ' s nostalgic cultural reverence, his sense of depletion and failure, and his declarations o f futile guilt, that a sacrificial rhetoric o f exhaustion has overtaken contemporary travel writing, particularly the kind o f travel writing that purports to offer political analysis (see discussion o f N a i p a u l ' s w o r k in chap. 2). B u t need this be so? Peter R o b b ' s Midnight in Sicily (1996), a study o f southern Italian M a f i a culture, offers an alternative model, demon strating that the travel b o o k ' s generic flexibility and hybrid status can be turned to positive effect in contemporary, disaster-tilted documen tary writing. T h e Australian R o b b , w h o lived in southern Italy for fourteen years from 1978 onward, returned to Sicily in 1995 as the Andreotti trial began. R o b b reports a friend's concerns about the possibility o f i'i'-.
1 ;< • i n n
. 0 1
his writing a b o u t Sicily and the Mafia: that he w o u l d have to trivialize contexts, events, and characters; that he w o u l d end up, in short, b y turning it all into travel writing. This skeptical friend, the Sicilian C l a r a , tells o f an Italo-American w o m a n , w h o had come to T r a p a n i (in Sicily) some years before to find out more a b o u t her family. This w o m a n had enlisted C l a r a ' s help through letters o f introduction; but as it turned out, she w a s also preparing a travel b o o k . W h e n the b o o k w a s eventually published, C l a r a discovered to her horror that her local restaurant featured in it as a prime tourist site: Ten days ago [Clara explains to Robb], 1 got a phone call from a travel agent in Palermo. He had a coachload of American ladies and they all wanted to come and eat at Clara's restaurant. 1 told him it was closed and he said they were coming anyway. They wanted to see me. (247) But as C l a r a acknowledges, " y o u wouldn't be writing anything like that, after all" (247); and it is certainly true that R o b b is no Peter Mayle, sell ing a romance o f Mediterranean peasant life (and gourmet cooking) to hundreds o f thousands o f eager A n g l o - A m e r i c a n consumers. Midnight
in Sicily is a subtly written and allusively layered travel
b o o k . R o b b frames each o f its twelve chapters with episodes such as visiting a market or a restaurant, catching a bus to some destination, interviewing a political or artistic figure. Several o f these episodes derive from the earlier years he spent in Sicily. Political commentary, as well as historical narrative, unfolds from local specificity, with dis cussions o f regional cuisine (say, the ice cream o f the M e z z o g i o r n o ) opening out into accounts o f Mafia revenge killings. T h e b o o k is alive with movement, from w a l k s through city streets and assorted local car, bus, and ferry rides, to the narrative oscillations between g e o g r a p h y and history, aesthetic commentary and urban practice, political analy sis and dramatically reconstructed scenes. T h e effect is at first immedi ate and artless but, on reflection, heavily mediated, with the sense o f careful patterning o f a densely w o v e n tapestry. T h e various transitions, from apparently "free" experiential narratives to more structured his tories and commentaries, attune the practice o f reading to the recogni tion o f travel as a process close to that o f negotiating between disparate orders o f life and k n o w l e d g e . " Robb's
specific narrative
investigations
into
the
notorious
Andreotti Kiss, the assassinations o f the prosecutors Borsellino and Falcone, the kidnapping and killing o f A k l o M o m , and a host o f vio-
l O U R I S T . S W l ' l II I V I ' l . W H I l I ' H S
lent M a f i a murders—gain in complexity and, paradoxically, credibility as they are balanced against other literary accounts: most notably, the Sicilian novelist Sciascia's. L a m p e d u s a ' s The Leopard
(1957) also
receives careful attention, and other key artists, including Eugenio M o n t a l e , Pasolini, R e n a t o G u t t u s o , Letizia Battaglia, and L i n a W e r t muller, heighten the nuanced sense o f a rich, fraught culture o f exploitation and intimidation. R o b b ' s figuring o f the midnight at which the b o o k begins and ends is another heightening device; but it is one that, in spite o f its melodramatic symbolism, does not act to reduce the cultural specificity o f Sicily's politics o f violence b y naturalizing it or assimilating it to some overarching "universal" theory. T h u s , although R o b b quotes Sciascia as having declared that "Sicily is a metaphor for the modern w o r l d " (314), he at no point balloons it out into a "cause," instance, or explanation o f a millennially exhausted w o r l d — a s K a p l a n might well have done. But
R o b b ' s travel b o o k has more u p its sleeve than an informed
commentary on the Mafia crisis in postwar Italy. This surplus is c o n nected with Tisdale's gloss (in her previously mentioned essay on travel writing) on Isherwood's remark that "the ideal travel b o o k should be perhaps like a crime story in which y o u ' r e in search o f something" (qtd. in Tisdale 71). Tisdale adds her o w n observation: Part of a search is momentum, and not knowing where you might end up. In the best travel books, the narrator is looking: for a person, a building, a view, a rare bird, a certain truth, (gi) In this case, R o b b is retracing Sciascia's (the midcentury novelist's) footsteps. Sciascia lived in R a c a l m u t o , a quiet mining t o w n — a n d Mafia stronghold. R o b b takes a bus to the town, which occupies t w o sides o f a hill l o o k i n g seaward and inland; on this particular afternoon, the t o w n is bleak on both its slopes, "closed and shuttered" with doors "tight shut" and "sightless streets." T h e atmosphere is one o f contain ment, augmented by a somber funeral procession. R o b b seeks a town center and a hotel, but ends up finding neither. Instead, the town offers only a vista o f sheep-tracked slopes and lifeless streets. T h e visitor speculates that these horizontal streets weren't in fact parallels, like altitude lines on a map but a single spiral, one immensely long street winding through I he deserted town from top to bottom, like the thread in a screw. Then in the shadows I saw another hearse, another glimpse of pol ished mahogany, d r a g g i n g me up and down the narrow parallels or
I'ON T S C I U I ' T
JIIS
w i n d i n g r o u n d a n d r o u n d R a c a l m u t o o n its w a y t o t h e g r a v e y a r d .
(278) The description seems to have both writer and reader trapped in a kind of mise en abyme; but, as R o b b suggests, Sciascia was already familiar with this territory, and it is less that the earlier writer had created this seemingly postmodern m o m e n t than that the " t o w n embodied the hid den secrets and the vertiginous symmetries or asymmetries in the archi tecture o f Sciascia's labyrinthine stories" (280). Sciascia, in turn, " o w e d to his master Borges that sense o f an annihilating metaphysics hidden in experience" (280); and before them b o t h c o m e the mazes and winding, redoubled narratives o f The Thousand and One Nights. R o b b m a k e s the case, if indirectly, that certain literary tropes and techniques situate the writing o f southern Italy within the ambience o f E u r o p e a n postmodernism, with its pastiche o f actions and agents replacing "confidently realistic fiction" (280). Y e t he ultimately finds "something pinched and limited in the solutions [Borges and Sciascia] found, a withering o f promise" (282). R o b b shows here h o w some con ventions of contemporary, postmodern travel writing (discontinuous narrative, allusiveness, free allegory; see chap. 4) can be used to pro duce a defined rendering of culture, rather than—as is more usually the case—freeing the material from such "historical" portraits. If R o b b corresponds to a type o f Tisdale's searching traveler-writer, he leaves the reader feeling that he has found at least part o f what he sought. A t the same time, R o b b ' s travel b o o k suggests possibilities for the replen ishment o f the genre through an intuitive, informed use o f some o f its most traditional elements: the quest to become an insider without resorting to appropriative arrogance; the deployment o f a firm yet flexible repertoire o f cultural knowledge; the practice o f a lively and nuanced narrative art. Such resources are still available, and their adoption holds more promise than the tactic, more c o m m o n l y prac ticed, o f falling back on forms o f generic imitation (see chap. 2). A t the millennium, the travel writer occupies a compromised, ambivalent position. O n the one hand, as w e have seen, he or she is likely to be dismissed as a pulp producer, a p a w n of crass industry pres sures, an overexuberant performer, even a liar: as a participant, in short, in what Jonathan R a b a n has m e m o r a b l y called "a notoriously raffish house where very different genres are likely to end up in the same bed . . . literature's red-light district" (qtd. in B o u r k e 46). R a b a n ,
.•!<>
i m i H l N T N WliH I VPIfWRlTItl
who has declared that he "absolutely detestfs] the term 'travel writer,'" recites a familiar catalogue o f the genre's stock-in-trade types: t h e c l a s s i c y o u n g p e r s o n ' s t r a v e l b o o k , w h i c h is b a s i c a l l y d e s c e n d e d f r o m the picaresque n o v e l ; the adventures o f a rolling stone in foreign territory; fiction
t h e political j o u r n e y ; social history;
some very
explicit
w r i t i n g , p a r t i c u l a r l y W a u g h , G r e e n e a n d R o b e r t B y r o n ' s The
Road to Oxiana; l a n d s c a p e w r i t i n g , w h i c h is a l m o s t t h e v e r b a l e q u i v alent o flandscape painting; a n d the travel b o o k w h i c h belongs i n the genre o f memoir. ( Q t d . inB o u r k e 46)
Y e t R a b a n , a leading practitioner, still very m u c h believes in the travel book, distinguishing between the type o f b o o k that is little more than an assemblage o f fragments, a promiscuous mixture, and the one that subtly modulates between different literary registers and cultural resources. R a b a n clearly k n o w s w h a t he believes to be a "superior" travel b o o k ; b u t neither he nor anyone else c a n provide a prescrip tion- -a formula for it. Millennial thinking is, b y definition, a form o f closure; it radically domesticates time and space b y turning them into ghosts in the house. Travel, at least potentially, opens u p a world o f estrangement: one in which the w o r k — t h e travail—of travel is to engage with others pro ductively, to produce a site or number o f sites that resist uniformity, and that gesture instead t o difference, "otherness," and a diversity o f (cross-)cultural forms. This study has suggested that travel and travel writing are flourishing, and will continue tc* flourish b e y o n d the mil lennium. S o m e o f the reasons for this are only t o o apparent. It is cer tainly true that selling travel is one o f the things that helps to sell travel b o o k s , a n d that these sales p a y literal tribute to all the cliches o f the moment: a shrinking world, " g l o b a l culture," the containment o f cul tural difference through the processes o f commodification. Y e t it is also true that the travel b o o k , through its negotiation o f time, space, and culture, continues to engage large numbers and several different kinds o f readers. There is every reason to invite the travel b o o k to reex amine its biases, to realign the boundaries within which travel risks being reified and paradoxically immobilized as a discursive category. There is no reason, though, t o announce an obituary on travel or, w h a t would be just as premature, to decree travel writing's end.
I'liNTNClNMM
."i
7
NOTES
I N T R O D U C T I O N 1. P r i v a t e c o n v e r s a t i o n w i t h M a r t i n R o b e r t s , 1996: w i t h t h a n k s . 2. T r a v e l w r i t i n g is, o f c o u r s e , a p r i m a r y v e h i c l e f o r t h e e x o t i c i n s o f a r as it registers a p p r e c i a t i o n o f — s o m e t i m e s r e v u l s i o n f o r — p e o p l e s a n d c u l t u r e s c o n s i d e r e d " d i f f e r e n t " o r " r e m o t e . " T h e e x o t i c i s t o b j e c t i f i c a t i o n o f t h e c u l t u r a l " o t h e r " is a s t a p l e o f t r a v e l w r i t i n g , as is t h e c o n v e r s i o n o f " o t h e r " c u l t u r e s i n t o a m e d i a friendly spectacle. V i c t o r Segalen's definition o f e x o t i c i s m as t h e "aesthetics o f d i v e r s i t y " is w e l l s u i t e d t o a g e n r e t h a t f r e q u e n t l y d e p o l i t i c i z e s ( a n d / o r d e h i s t o r i c i z e s ) t h e o b j e c t s o f its s t u d y , a n d t h a t s e e k s t o c a p i t a l i z e o n a e s t h e t i c i z e d m y t h s o f cultural difference. A s a n exoticist m o d e , E u r o - A m e r i c a n travel w r i t i n g risks being seen a s t a c i t l y i m p e r i a l i s t : see, f o r e x a m p l e , A r a c a n d R i t v o ' s d e f i n i t i o n o f e x o t i c i s m as " t h e a e s t h e t i c i z i n g m e a n s b y w h i c h t h e p a i n o f [ i m p e r i a l ] e x p a n s i o n is c o n verted t o spectacle, t o culture i n the service o f e m p i r e " (3). F o r f u r t h e r discussion o f t h e e x o t i c i s t p r o j e c t i n i t s h i s t o r i c a l p e r s p e c t i v e , see B o n g i e , t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n t o Rousseau and Porter, and Todorov. 3. S e e , f o r e x a m p l e , E r i c N e w b y ' s a n d R e d m o n d O ' H a n l o n ' s s e l f - m o c k i n g a t t e m p t s t o p a s s t h e m s e l v e s o f f as n i n e t e e n t h - c e n t u r y t r a v e l e r s ( c h a p . 1), o r t h e u b i q u i t o u s distaste f o r tourists s h o w n in the worjk of, a m o n g m a n y others, P a u l T h e r o u x ( c h a p . 2). T h e r h e t o r i c o f n o s t a l g i a o f t e n a c c o m p a n i e s s u c h d i s t i n c t i o n s a nostalgia o n w h i c h , ironically, the m o d e r n tourist industry depends. See here Culler's essay " T h e Semiotics o f T o u r i s m " ; P r o w ' s " T o u r i s m a n d the Semiotics o f N o s t a l g i a " ; M a c C a n n e l l ' s The Tourist; K r o t z ' s less a n a l y t i c a l Tourists; a n d B u z a r d , e s p . c h a p s . 1 a n d 2. A s C u l l e r s a y s , " [ F ] e r o c i o u s d e n i g r a t i o n o f t o u r i s m is in p a r t a n a t t e m p t t o c o n v i n c e o n e s e l f t h a t o n e is n o t a t o u r i s t . . . . T h e d e s i r e t o d i s t i n g u i s h b e t w e e n t o u r i s t s a n d r e a l t r a v e l e r s is a p a r t o f t o u r i s m — i n t e g r a l t o it r a t h e r t h a n o u t s i d e it o r b e y o n d i t " (156). T r a v e l w r i t i n g , b y c o r o l l a r y , r e m a i n s c o m p l i c i t w i t h t h e ( m a s s ) t o u r i s m it d e n o u n c e s ; a n d w h i l e it m a y b e g i v e n t o see itself as a n a n t i d o t e t o m o d e r n t o u r i s m , its m o r e u s u a l e f f e c t m a y b e t o p r o v i d e a f u r t h e r i n c e n t i v e f o r it. 4. F o r a n a c c o u n t o f t h e " r e a l i t y e f f e c t " o f c o n t e m p o r a r y t r a v e l w r i t i n g , see I ' r a t t ' s d i s c u s s i o n o f T h e r o u x ' s w o r k i n t h e final c h a p t e r o f Imperial Eyes. P r a t t offers t h e f o l l o w i n g reasons f o r h e r students' defense o f T h e r o u x ' s " v e r a c i t y " : " f h e depth-creating p o w e r s o f the travel writer m u s t c o m p e t e w i t h the t e n - d a y nine-night a i r p a c k a g e , tips included, a n d t h e glossy, d i s e m b o d i e d fantasies o f l o u r i s t p r o p a g a n d a . I n t h e 1960s a n d 1970s, e x o t i c i s t v i s i o n s o f p l e n i t u d e a n d p a r a d i s e w e r e a p p r o p r i a t e d a n d c o m m o d i f i e d o n a n u n p r e c e d e n t e d scale b y t h e t o u r i s t i n d u s t r y . ' R e a l ' w r i t e r s l o o k u p the task o f p r o v i d i n g 'realist' ( d e g r a d e d , c o u n t e r -
to
c o m m o d i n e d ) versions o f p o s t c o l o n i a l reality. T h e 'effect o f the real' T h e r o u x h a d o n t h e class I t a u g h t w a s d o u b t l e s s c o n s t r u c t e d i n p a r t o u t o f s t u d e n t s ' o w n identification w i t h 'real' representation o v e r a n d against c o m m o d i f i e d representa t i o n s t h r o u g h w h i c h t o u r i s m , q u i t e s u c c e s s f u l l y , m a r k e t s t h e w o r l d t o t h e m " (221). 5. S e e h e r e a l s o L e e d , e s p . i n t r o d u c t i o n a n d e p i l o g u e . F o r L e e d , " t h e h i s t o r y o f t r a v e l is i n c r u c i a l w a y s a h i s t o r y o f t h e w e s t . I t r e c o u n t s t h e e v o l u t i o n f r o m n e c e s s i t y t o f r e e d o m , a n e v o l u t i o n t h a t g a v e rise t o a n e w c o n s c i o u s n e s s , t h e p e c u l i a r m e n t a l i t y o f t h e m o d e r n t r a v e l e r " (14). H e r e as e l s e w h e r e i n his b o o k ( a s a l s o i n C o c k e r ' s ) , L e e d p r e f e r s t o see f r e e d o m i n g e n e r a l i z e d e x i s t e n t i a l t e r m s — t h e r e b y eliding the e c o n o m i c distinctions that usually m a k e travel possible. 6. S e e , f o r e x a m p l e , t h e r a t h e r w e i g h t y i n t r o d u c t i o n t o V a n d e n A b b e e l e ' s Travel as Metaphor. F o r V a n d e n A b b e e l e , t h e m e t a p h o r o f t r a v e l is p a r a d o x i c a l : it n e c e s s a r i l y i m p l i e s a c h a n g e o f p l a c e , y e t it is p r e d i c a t e d o n , a n d r e s t r i c t e d b y , a c e r t a i n c o n c e p t i o n o f h o m e ( t h e oikos). " H o m e , t h e v e r y a n t i t h e s i s o f t r a v e l , is t h e c o n c e p t t h r o u g h w h i c h t h e v o y a g e is ' o i k o n o m i z e d ' i n t o a c o m m o n p l a c e " ( x v i i i ) . H e n c e t h e c o n t r a d i c t i o n : " D e s p i t e its a s s o c i a t i o n w i t h the interesting o r the i n n o v a t i v e , t h e m o t i f o f t h e v o y a g e c o u n t s as a m o n g t h e m o s t m a n i f e s t l y b a n a l i n W e s t ern letters" (xiii). F o r a different v i e w o f the dialectic b e t w e e n " h o m e " a n d dis p l a c e m e n t i n t h e a g e o f p o s t m o d e r n i t y , see t h e e s s a y s i n R o b e r t s o n e t a l . , a n d C a r e n K a p l a n ' s Questions of Travel. I t is i n t e r e s t i n g t o n o t e t h e d i s c r e p a n c y between "transgressive" academic approaches t o travel a n d the m o r e traditional, o f t e n n o s t a l g i c , n a r r a t i v e s t h a t a r e still v e r y c o m m o n i n c o n t e m p o r a r y t r a v e l w r i t i n g . T h i s d i s c r e p a n c y is d i s c u s s e d f u r t h e r i n c h a p t e r s 3 a n d 4 o f t h i s b o o k . 7 . O n b e l a t e d n e s s i n t r a v e l w r i t i n g , see B e h d a d , Belated Travelers. F o r B e h d a d , travel w r i t i n g expresses the "exoticist desire f o r the d i s a p p e a r i n g o t h e r " (14); " b e l a t e d o r i e n t a l i s t s , " s u c h as F l a u b e r t i n t h e n i n e t e e n t h c e n t u r y , a r e t r a v e l e r w r i t e r s s t r u g g l i n g t o " c o m e t o t e r m s w i t h t h e loss o f t h e o b j e c t o f [ t h e i r ] d e s i r e s — t h e d i s a p p e a r a n c e o f t h e O r i e n t , its d i s s o l u t i o n b y E u r o p e a n c o l o n i a l i s m " ( 6 6 ) . F l a u b e r t ' s travel w r i t i n g inscribes the " i m p o s s i b i l i t y o f . .. d r e a m s o f r e s t o r a t i o n " (66); it articulates the desire t o preserve a past t h a t has a l r e a d y p a s s e d i n t o m y t h . T w e n t i e t h - c e n t u r y travel w r i t i n g like, say, O ' H a n l o n ' s also articulates this desire, b u t w i t h m o r e t h a n a measure o f self-parody. See the discussion o f O ' H a n l o n ' s w o r k , a n d o f his a t t i t u d e t o b e l a t e d n e s s , i n c h a p t e r 1 o f t h i s b o o k . 8. S e e F r o w a n d a l s o B o n g i e ( e . g . , 4-5), f o r a d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e c o m p l e x r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n t r a v e l w r i t i n g , e x o t i c i s m , a n d n o s t a l g i a . N o s t a l g i a , as F r o w a n d B o n g i e s u g g e s t , e n a c t s a d i a l e c t i c o f d e s i r e : it seeks a p a s t o f its o w n i n v e n t i o n t h a t it k n o w s i n a d v a n c e t o b e i m p o s s i b l e . B u t w h i l e n o s t a l g i a o f f e r s a s p u r i o u s p a n a c e a f o r d i s a f f e c t i o n w i t h a " d e g r a d e d " p r e s e n t , i t is its v e r y f a l s e n e s s , p a r a d o x i c a l l y , t h a t m a k e s it s o a p p e a l i n g . T h e " i n a u t h e n t i c i t y " o f n o s t a l g i a is i t s o w n m o t i v a t i n g force; t o u r i s m a n d , indirectly, travel w r i t i n g t u r n this afflictive desire t o their o w n material advantage, exploiting t o commercial ends nostalgia's self-perpetuating a n x i e t y . H e n c e t h e e l e g i a c s t r a i n i n m u c h c o n t e m p o r a r y t r a v e l w r i t i n g , as it y e a r n s n o s t a l g i c a l l y f o r l o s t v i s i o n s o f " a u t h e n t i c " e x p e r i e n c e . F o r a n e x p l o r a t i o n o f tile i r o n i e s i m p l i c i t i n t h i s p o s i t i o n , see t h e d i s c u s s i o n o f R o s a l d o ' s t e r m " i m p e r i a l i s t n o s t a l g i a " i n c h a p t e r t o f this b o o k . 9. S e e , f o r e x a m p l e , W a t t ' s d i s c u s s i o n o f v e r i s i m i l i t u d e i n t h e e a r l y n o v e l in The Rise of the Novel, c h a p t e r 1, o r lire a t t e m p t l o a c c o u n t f o r I h e i n f l u e n c e o f D e f o e ' s j o u r n a l i s m o n his f i c t i o n i n c h a p t e r s 3 a n d 4 10. W h i t e ' s a r g u m e n t applies p r i m a r i l y 1 0 W e s u - r n h i s t o r i o g r a p h y , w h o s e .' .'i >
N< I I I ' .
M l
I'M.i'V
I
M l
t r o p o l o g i c a l n a t u r e defies s o m e o f its p r a c t i t i o n e r s ' c l a i m s t o r e c o r d e d " f a c t . " T h e s t a t u s o f t h e " f a c t u a l " i n t r a v e l w r i t i n g is f u r t h e r c o m p l i c a t e d , b o t h b y t h e ( o f t e n conspicuous) unreliability o f the i n f o r m a t i o n being presented a n d b y the a m b i v a l e n t f u n c t i o n o f t h e p r e s e n t e r as a r e p o r t e r / s t o r y t e l l e r . W h i l e s o m e t r a v e l w r i t e r s c l a i m , o r w i s h t o c l a i m , d o c u m e n t a r y s t a t u s f o r t h e i r w o r k , it is c l e a r t h a t m o s t travel n a r r a t i v e s are i n f u s e d w i t h t h e traveler-writer's subjectivity. A l s o , like cer tain kinds o f investigative journalists, travel writers often w i t h h o l d their s o u r c e s — they m e d i a t e b e t w e e n the desire t o i m p a r t verifiable i n f o r m a t i o n a n d the t e m p t a t i o n t o o b f u s c a t e , t o present the spectacle o f " m y s t i q u e . " T r a v e l w r i t i n g , i n this c o n t e x t , is n o t j u s t p r o f i t - d r i v e n o r e n t e r t a i n m e n t - o r i e n t e d , b u t m a y b e u s e d t o c h a r t t h e l i m i t s o f k n o w l e d g e a n d t o test t h e c l a i m s o f i n f o r m a t i o n . F o r f u r t h e r d i s c u s s i o n s o f t h e t r u t h c l a i m s o f t r a v e l w r i t i n g , see t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n s t o M a r y C a m p b e l l a n d N i x o n ; f o r d e t a i l e d a n a l y s i s o f t h e i n t e r p l a y b e t w e e n " f a c t " a n d fiction i n r e f e r e n t i a l w r i t i n g , see a l s o F o l e y , S a u e r b e r g , a n d t h e e s s a y s i n W e b e r , e s p . M a c D o n a l d ' s piece o n " p a r a j o u r n a l i s m . " 11. S e e a l s o P r a t t ' s e s s a y " F i e l d w o r k i n C o m m o n P l a c e s . " L i k e W h e e l e r , Pratt deconstructs the opposition between travelers a n d ethnographers, c o m m e n t i n g f o r e x a m p l e o n t h e figure o f t h e " c a s t a w a y " a s a p o p u l a r , s t r a t e g i c a l l y mystificatory self-image for the ethnographer. " T h e authority o f the e t h n o g r a p h e r o v e r t h e ' m e r e t r a v e l e r ' rests c h i e f l y o n t h e i d e a t h a t t h e t r a v e l e r j u s t p a s s e s t h r o u g h , w h e r e a s t h e e t h n o g r a p h e r lives w i t h t h e g r o u p u n d e r s t u d y . B u t o f c o u r s e t h i s is w h a t c a p t i v e s a n d c a s t a w a y s o f t e n d o t o o , l i v i n g i n a n o t h e r c u l t u r e i n e v e r y capacity f r o m prince t o slave, learning indigenous languages a n d lifeways w i t h a proficiency a n e t h n o g r a p h e r w o u l d e n v y , a n d often p r o d u c i n g accounts that are i n d e e d f u l l , r i c h , a n d a c c u r a t e b y e t h n o g r a p h y ' s o w n s t a n d a r d s " (38). L i k e W h e e l e r , P r a t t uses c o m p a r i s o n s w i t h t r a v e l w r i t i n g t o d e m y s t i f y e t h n o g r a p h y ' s pretension to objectivity, a n d t o d r a w attention t o the investment placed b y b o t h travel w r i t i n g a n d a n t h r o p o l o g y i n exoticist representations o f a designated cul tural " o t h e r . " See here also K e e s i n g ' s essay " E x o t i c R e a d i n g s o f C u l t u r a l T e x t s . " L i k e P r a t t a n d W h e e l e r , K e e s i n g sees e t h n o g r a p h e r s a s " d e a l e r s i n e x o t i c a " ; h e goes f u r t h e r , h o w e v e r , t h a n either i n c l a i m i n g that the a n t h r o p o l o g i c a l "predilec tion f o r p u r v e y i n g e x o t i c a " impels ethnographers " n o t o n l y t o choose the m o s t exotic possible cultural d a t a f o r [their] texts b u t t o give t h e m the m o s t exotic p o s sible r e a d i n g s — a n d , i n d o i n g s o , o f t e n d i s t o r t a n d m i s t r a n s l a t e " (459-60). T h e d i f f e r e n c e w i t h t r a v e l w r i t i n g h e r e is t h a t m a n y t r a v e l w r i t e r s w i l l f u l l y m i s t r a n s l a t e a n d distort; t h e y are n o t c o n s t r a i n e d b y the s a m e rules a n d r e g u l a t i o n s g o v e r n i n g the presentation o f " f a c t u a l " d a t a , a n d o u t l a n d i s h interpretations o f such d a t a arc not o n l y c o m m o n to, b u t sometimes desirable in, the genre. F o r further discussion o f t h e l i n k s b e t w e e n t r a v e l w r i t i n g a n d e t h n o g r a p h y , see c h a p t e r s 2 a n d 3 ( o n Varawa's " u n c o m m o n anthropology"). 12. T h e n o t o r i o u s d i a t r i b e a g a i n s t t r a v e l w r i t i n g a t t h e b e g i n n i n g o f Tristes Tropiques c a n n o t d i s g u i s e t h e f a c t t h a t L e v i - S t r a u s s g o e s o n t o p r o d u c e , p r e c i s e l y , an e t h n o g r a p h i c travel narrative. F o r a f u r t h e r discussion o f the ironic implica t i o n s o f his d i s c l a i m e r , see t h e s e c t i o n o n A m a z o n t r a v e l i n c h a p t e r 2. D e s p i t e t h e o b v i o u s s l i p p a g e i n L e v i - S t r a u s s ' s a r g u m e n t , t h e v e n o m t h a t a c c o m p a n i e s his d i s m i s s a l o f t r a v e l w r i t i n g r e m a i n s m e m o r a b l e (see t h e e x c e r p t f r o m Tristes Tropiques in t h e p r e f a c e t o lliis b o o k ) , 13. S e e I g t u i t i e f f ' s i n t e r v i e w w i t h C h u t w i n a m i a l s o C h a t w i n ' s p o s t h u m o u s c o l l e c t i n n Anatomy of Rvxtlesswss (OMMMIIIKHI in c h a p . 4 ) , NUTllS
m
I'M." '
11
I I
' '1
14- T h e d e f i n i t i o n is t a k e n f r o m Chambers Twentieth Century Dictionary ( E d i n b u r g h : P i t m a n P r e s s , 1981), 818. 15. S e e R o s a l d o , e s p . 68-74; also discussion o f imperialist nostalgia in c h a p t e r 1. 16. F o r P r a t t , c o n t e m p o r a r y t r a v e l w r i t i n g o f t e n h e a r k e n s b a c k t o " l o s t i d i o m s o f d i s c o v e r y a n d d o m i n a t i o n " (Imperial Eyes 224); i n c o n t i n u i n g t o d e p l o y i m p e r i a l i s t t r o p e s s u c h as t h e " m o n a r c h - o f - a l l - I - s u r v e y , " it r e p l a c e s t h e n i n e teenth-century White M a n ' s B u r d e n with the twentieth-century W h i t e M a n ' s L a m e n t ( c h a p . 9, e s p . 216-21). s e e
t n e
17. S e e M a r y C a m p b e l l , The Witness and the Other World, e s p . c h a p s . 2 ( o n the m e d i e v a l W o n d e r B o o k ) a n d 5 ( o n C o l u m b u s ' s voyages). A s C a m p b e l l notes a c e r b i c a l l y , " [ C o l u m b u s ' s ] Journal a n d t h e Letter c o n f l a t e t h e E a r t h l y P a r a d i s e o f M a n d e v i l l e ' s E a s t w i t h t h e p a s t o r a l locus amoenus; t h e result is a C a r i b b e a n t h a t b e l o n g s as m u c h t o t h e O t h e r W o r l d o f m e d i e v a l g e o g r a p h i c f a n t a s y as it d o e s t o t h e m a p [he] h e l p e d r e a l i z e . . . . [ H i s ] l i t e r a l b e l i e f i n t h e f a n t a s t i c m a y s e e m c h a r m ing t o a m o d e r n reader, b u t m a y well h a v e helped p r o p a g a t e the m o n s t r o u s stereo types t h r o u g h w h i c h the S p a n i s h E m p i r e p e r c e i v e d — a n d m o n s t r o u s l y abused—its A m e r i c a n ' s u b j e c t s ' " (10-11). 18. S e e G r e e n b l a t t , 128-36, a n d M a r y C a m p b e l l , c h a p s . 5 a n d 6; see a l s o d e C e r t e a u , f o r w h o m " t h e d i s c o u r s e t h a t sets o f f i n s e a r c h o f t h e o t h e r w i t h t h e impossible task o f saying the truth returns f r o m afar w i t h the authority t o speak in t h e n a m e o f t h e o t h e r a n d c o m m a n d b e l i e f (69). 19. O n v o y e u r i s m i n a n t h r o p o l o g y , see T o r g o v n i c k ' s d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e w o r k o f M a l i n o w s k i a n d M e a d i n c h a p . 5 o f Gone Primitive, 225-43; ' Hawthorn's " T h e P o l i t i c s o f t h e E x o t i c " a n d L u t z a n d C o l l i n s ' s c r i t i c a l s t u d y Reading National Geographic, f o r d i s c u s s i o n s o f t h e v o y e u r i s t i c t e n d e n c i e s o f d o m i n a n t c u l t u r e s i n their perception a n d e x p l o i t a t i o n o f those w h o m they strategically consider " o t h e r . " A l l o f these w r i t e r s d e t e c t a l i n k b e t w e e n c u l t u r a l v o y e u r i s m as i m p e r i a l ist p r a c t i c e a n d t h e o b j e c t i f i c a t i o n — t h e " o t h e r i n g " o f t h e e t h n i c i z e d / g e n d e r e d s e e a
s o
b o d y ; f o r a f u r t h e r d i s c u s s i o n o f t h i s r e l a t i o n s h i p , see c h a p . 3 i n t h i s b o o k . 20. S e e L u t z a n d C o l l i n s , e s p . c h a p s . 4 a n d 7. A s t h e y o b s e r v e , " N o t h i n g d e f i n e s t h e National Geographic f o r m o s t o l d e r A m e r i c a n r e a d e r s m o r e t h a n its 'naked' w o m e n . T h e widely shared cultural experience o f viewing w o m e n ' s bodies in the m a g a z i n e d r a w s o n a n d acculturates the audience's ideas a b o u t race, g e n d e r , a n d s e x u a l i t y , w i t h t h e m a r k e d s u b c a t e g o r y i n e a c h case b e i n g b l a c k , f e m a l e , a n d the unreprcssed. . . . [ T ] h e m a g a z i n e ' s n u d i t y f o r m s a central p a r t o f the image o f t h e n o n - W e s t t h a t it p u r v e y s " (115). 21. I n e x o t i c i s m , a c c o r d i n g t o T o d o r o v , " o t h e r n e s s is s y s t e m a t i c a l l y p r e f e r r e d to l i k e n e s s " (264). B u t " o t h e r n e s s , " b y d e f i n i t i o n , is a l s o s e p a r a t e d f r o m l i k e n e s s ; t h e effect o f e x o t i c i s t r e p r e s e n t a t i o n is t o d e r e a l i z e t h e r e p r e s e n t e d s u b j e c t . A s T o d o r o v explains in a n instructive c o m p a r i s o n o f the " e x o t i c " a n d " c o l o n i a l " n o v els: " T h e e x o t i c n o v e l g l o r i f i e s f o r e i g n e r s w h i l e t h e c o l o n i a l n o v e l d e n i g r a t e s t h e m . B u t t h e c o n t r a d i c t i o n is o n l y a p p a r e n t . O n c e t h e a u t h o r h a s d e c l a r e d t h a t h e h i m self is t h e o n l y s u b j e c t o n b o a r d a n d t h a t t h e o t h e r s h a v e b e e n r e d u c e d t o t h e r o l e o f o b j e c t s , it is a f t e r all o f s e c o n d a r y c o n c e r n w h e t h e r these o b j e c t s a r e l o v e d o r d e s p i s e d . T h e essential p o i n t is that t h e y a r e n o t full-fledged h u m a n b e i n g s " (323). T h e e x o t i c i s t r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n " s e l f " a n d " o t h e r " is m o r e c o m p l e x t h a n T o d o r o v i m p l i e s ; n o n e t h e l e s s , T o d o r o v ' s urguinviit h e l p s n e o o m U f o r the s i n g u l a r 2M
NOTIiiN i ' » I ' A O l " . I I ! • )
discrepancy in m u c h travel writing between t h e expressed attraction t o w a r d " o t h e r " people/cultures a n d t h e tacit w i s h t o keep t h e m a t a distance. 22. F o r a d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e f u r t h e r i m p l i c a t i o n s o f c r o s s - d r e s s i n g , see c h a p . 3 o f this b o o k . 23. F o r a c r i t i q u e o f t h e — e x p l i c i t o r i m p l i c i t — e t h n o c e n t r i s m o f E u r o - A m e r i c a n t r a v e l w r i t i n g , see t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n s t o P o r t e r ' s Haunted Journeys a n d P r a t t ' s Imperial Eyes; see a l s o , i n m o r e p o l e m i c a l v e i n , S u g n e t . C h a p t e r 1 o f t h i s b o o k deals i n s o m e detail w i t h " p o s t c o l o n i a l " alternatives t o these E u r o c e n t r i c m o d e l s . 24. T h e w o r k o f J a m e s C l i f f o r d is e x e m p l a r y h e r e : see, f o r i n s t a n c e , h i s essays " T r a v e l i n g C u l t u r e s " a n d " D i a s p o r a s , " r e p r i n t e d i n h i s m o s t r e c e n t b o o k Routes ( 1 9 9 7 ) , a n d t h e special e d i t i o n o f t h e j o u r n a l Inscriptions, e d . C l i f f o r d a n d D h a r e s h w a r (1989). T h e e m e r g e n c e o f t r a n s n a t i o n a l a n d / o r p o s t n a t i o n a l s t u d i e s as a n a c a d e m i c d i s c i p l i n e is s i g n a l e d i n n e w j o u r n a l s s u c h as Diaspora a n d Public Culture, w h i c h f o c u s o n c o m p l e x flows ( o f i n f o r m a t i o n , i d e a s , m o n e y , e t c . ) t h a t t r a v e r s e , transcend, a n d challenge t h e status o f national/cultural b o u n d a r i e s . F o r expressly t r a n s n a t i o n a l a p p r o a c h e s t o t r a v e l w r i t i n g , see t h e r e c e n t w o r k o f G r e w a l a n d C a r e n K a p l a n . See also chapters 1 a n d , especially, 4 o f this b o o k . 25. S e e , f o r e x a m p l e , B h a b h a ' s e s s a y " D i s s e m i N a t i o n , " i n h i s e d i t e d Nation and Narration; f o r a m o r e d e t a i l e d d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e " e m e r g e n c e o f a p o s t n a t i o n a l o r d e r , " see a l s o A p p a d u r a i , Modernity at Large. 26. T h e t e r m transculturation is u s u a l l y a c c r e d i t e d t o t h e C u b a n a n t h r o p o l o gist F e r n a n d o O r t i z . F o r its a p p l i c a b i l i t y t o t r a v e l w r i t i n g , see P r a t t , Imperial Eyes; a l s o , i n t h i s b o o k , t h e d i s c u s s i o n o f I y e r ' s w o r k i n c h a p t e r 1. 2 7 . F o r a d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e i m p a c t o f s p e e d o n ( p o s t ) m o d e r n s o c i e t y , see V i r ilio. F o r V i r i l i o , s p e e d p o t e n t i a l l y erases t h e g a p s t h a t s e p a r a t e g l o b a l s p a c e s — p r e cisely t h e g a p s t h a t t r a v e l a n d t r a v e l w r i t i n g o c c u p y . V i r i l i o ' s e m p h a s i s is o n t h e v i o l e n c e o f s p e e d a n d its d e p l o y m e n t i n t h e g l o b a l a r m s r a c e ; s p e e d c o n s i s t s i n " t h e a c c e l e r a t i o n o f t h e m e a n s o f c o m m u n i c a t i n g d e s t r u c t i o n " (138). W h a t s p e e d u l t i m a t e l y g e s t u r e s t o w a r d , a c c o r d i n g t o V i r i l i o , is " t h e e n d o f t h e w o r l d as d i s t a n c e " ; b u t t h i s " d i s t a n c e l e s s " w o r l d i n w h i c h " e v e r y l o c a l i t y . . . is j u x t a p o s e d ] " creates a " f e a r s o m e f r i c t i o n o f p l a c e s a n d e l e m e n t s t h a t o n l y y e s t e r d a y w e r e still d i s t i n c t a n d s e p a r a t e d b y a b u f f e r o f d i s t a n c e s " (136). V i r i l i o ' s is a p a r a n o i d v i s i o n a k i n , t o s o m e e x t e n t , t o D e l e u z e a n d G u a t t a r i ' s i n f l u e n t i a l " T r e a t i s e o n N o m a d o l o g y . " I t is a useful c o u n t e r w e i g h t , nonetheless, t o c o n t e m p o r a r y m e d i a fantasies o f a h a p p y "global village" brought together through "instant" communication, and enjoying t h e f r u i t s o f a single w o r l d u n i t e d i n t h e p u r s u i t o f c o n s u m e r g o o d s . F o r f u r t h e r d i s c u s s i o n s o f t h e i m p a c t o f s p e e d a n d / o r g l o b a l i z a t i o n o n t r a v e l w r i t i n g , see a l s o chapters 1 a n d 4 o f this b o o k . 28. T h e B r i t i s h e d i t i o n o f F r a s e r ' s a n t h o l o g y is i n s t r u c t i v e i n its c h a n g e o f title: Worst Trips, as i f t h e a g g r a v a t i o n m e r e l y i n c r e a s e d w i t h e a c h r e t e l l i n g . 29. O n t h e p h e n o m e n o n o f t h e " t h e o r e t i c a l t r a v e l e r , " see t h e essays i n C l i f f o r d a n d D h a r e s h w a r , a n d also V a n d e n A b b e e l e ' s essay "Sightseers: T h e T o u r i s t as T h e o r i s t . " 30. S e e F e i f e r , Going Places, f o r a n a n a l y s i s o f t h e i m p l i c a t i o n s o f " p o s t t o u r i s m . " See also H u g g a n ' s discussion o f F e i f e r i n t h e essay " S o m e R e c e n t A u s tralian F i c t i o n s . " F r o m H u g g a n ' s essay: " P o s t - t o u r i s t s , a c c o r d i n g t o F e i f e r , a r e d i s t a n c e d f r o m t h e ( o u r i s l w o r l d , y e t o p e n t o t h e m a n y d e l i g h t s it o f f e r s ; t h e i r s is a d e m o c r a c y o f Uisto, as l i k e l y t o t a k e p l e a s u r e in a c h e a p piece o f m a s s - p r o d u c e d k i t s c h us in n n e x p e n s i v e i t e m o f local h a i k l i i T u l ' l s , a w a r e thiil t h e o n e is n o m o r e NOT IIS
Ai;;i '
'0...1M
t
g e n u i n e t h a n the o t h e r , a n d t h a t b o t h are p r o d u c t s o f a leisure i n d u s t r y d e s i g n e d t o convert the trappings o f indigenous culture into a profitable supply o f c o n s u m e r g o o d s " (173).
CHAPTER ONE 1. N e w b y cites d i r e c t l y f r o m W a u g h ' s p r e f a c e t o A Short Walk a t t h e e n d o f t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n t o A Traveller's Life. 2. F o r f u r t h e r d i s c u s s i o n s o f i m p e r i a l i s t n o s t a l g i a i n t h e c o n t e x t o f t r a v e l a n d t r a v e l w r i t i n g , see t h e r e l e v a n t s e c t i o n s o f G r e w a l ( e s p . 151) a n d C a r e n K a p l a n ( e s p . Questions of Travel 70-71). 3. S e e N i x o n ' s e s s a y o n t h e N a i p a u l b r o t h e r s , " P r e p a r a t i o n s f o r T r a v e l . " C o n r a d is o n e o f t h e N a i p a u l s ' s f a v o r i t e w r i t e r s : see, f o r e x a m p l e , " C o n r a d ' s D a r k n e s s " i n The Return of Eva Peron. S e e a l s o O ' H a n l o n ' s c r i t i c a l s t u d y o f C o n r a d , Joseph Conrad and Charles Darwin, i n w h i c h h e t r a c e s t h e i n f l u e n c e s o f D a r w i n ' s e v o l u t i o n a r y t h o u g h t o n C o n r a d ' s fiction. O ' H a n l o n ' s w o r k b e l o n g s t o a self-consciously primitivist school o f travel writing that trades, sometimes ironi cally, o n the " b a c k w a r d n e s s " a n d seductiveness o f " r e m o t e " indigenous peoples. T r a v e l w r i t i n g is a p r i m a r y v e h i c l e f o r t h e r e i n v e n t i o n o f t h e " p r i m i t i v e " i n t h e o v e r d e v e l o p e d ( W e s t e r n ) w o r l d o f the late t w e n t i e t h c e n t u r y . F o r a useful discus s i o n o f p r i m i t i v i s t t r o p e s c i r c u l a t i n g i n W e s t e r n c o n s u m e r c u l t u r e , see T o r g o v n i c k , p a r t i c u l a r l y t h e first s e c t i o n " G o i n g P r i m i t i v e " a n d t h e s u b s e c t i o n " T r a v e l i n g w i t h C o n r a d . " A l s o r e l e v a n t h e r e is M i c h a e l T a u s s i g ' s w o r k o n t h e f i g u r e o f t h e " w i l d m a n . " T h e " p r i m i t i v e " a n d the " w i l d m a n , " tropes liberally sprinkled t h r o u g h o u t O ' H a n l o n ' s w o r k , testify b o t h t o the exoticist c o n s t r u c t i o n o f the " o t h e r " i n travel w r i t i n g a n d t o the genre's c o n t i n u i n g critical role in interrogating a p u t a t i v e l y civ i l i z e d self. 4. U s e f u l b a c k g r o u n d o n t h e B r o o k e s is p r o v i d e d i n t h e c h a p t e r o n Lord Jim i n M o s e s ' s The Novel and the Globalization of Culture. 5. T h e i r o n y h e r e is t h a t N e w b y is a f u l l - t i m e p r o f e s s i o n a l t r a v e l w r i t e r w h o , l i k e o t h e r w e l l - k n o w n t r a v e l w r i t e r s , is w o r k i n g o n c o m m i s s i o n i n a l u c r a t i v e field. N e w b y is b y n o m e a n s a l o n e i n c h o o s i n g t o d o w n p l a y t h i s p r o f e s s i o n a l a s p e c t . T r a v e l writers r a r e l y let us k n o w a b o u t their i n c o m e , o r i n f o r m u s a b o u t t h e e c o n o m i c circumstances b e h i n d their trips. I t c o u l d b e a r g u e d , o f course, t h a t such i n f o r m a t i o n is u n i n t e r e s t i n g t o t h e r e a d e r . B u t it a l s o s u g g e s t s t h a t t r a v e l w r i t e r s like t o k e e p t h e i r m o t i v e s h i d d e n , o r a t least t o p r e t e n d t h a t t h e i r trips, o f t e n p r e p a i d a n d p r e p r o g r a m m e d , are g e n e r a t e d b y n o t h i n g m o r e t h a n artless c u r i o s i t y and spontaneous enthusiasm. 6. T r a v e l w r i t i n g , o f c o u r s e , h a s a v e n e r a b l e t r a d i t i o n o f a r t f u l l y i n g a n d p r a n k i s h d e c e i t : see, f o r e x a m p l e , P e r c y A d a m s ' s Travelers and Travel Liars, o r t h e c h a p t e r o n M a n d e v i l l e i n M a r y C a m p b e l l ' s The Witness and the Other World. W i l d e ' s r e c u p e r a t i o n o f l y i n g as " t h e p r o p e r a i m o f a r t " is e x p r e s s e d w i t h c h a r a c teristic wit i n his s e m i n a l essay " T h e D e c a y o f L y i n g . " 7. O n C h a t w i n ' s " n o m a d a e s t h e t i c , " see t h e i t a l i c i z e d s e c t i o n s o f The Songlines, w h i c h b o t h e x p l o r e t h e m e t a p h y s i c s o f restlessness a n d i m i t a t e it i n l i t e r a r y f o r m . S e e a l s o H u g g a n ' s d i s c u s s i o n o f The Songlinvs i n his e s s a y " M a p s , D r e a m s , a n d the Presentation o f E t h n o g r a p h i c N a r r a t i v e " ; a n d the treatment o f n o m a d i s m e l s e w h e r e in this b o o k , e s p e c i a l l y i n c h a p t e r 4 . 8. M n l n i u x d e s c r i b e s t h e m u s e u m w i t h o u t w a l l s in 'I'lie Voircs of Silence; I
NOT((}( I o I ' M . 1
1
'M
I
I
C h a t w i n ' s p r o f i l e o f M a l r a u x c a n b e f o u n d i n What Am I Doing Here (114-35). T h e m u s e u m is a t o p o s o f t r a v e l w r i t i n g , d r a w i n g a t t e n t i o n t o t h e d i s c r e p a n c y b e t w e e n the mobility o f traveler-writers a n d the curatorial immobilization o f the peoples/cultures a b o u t w h i c h t h e y w r i t e . C h a t w i n , like several o f his c o n t e m p o r a r i e s , is a n e n t h u s i a s t i c m u s e u m v i s i t o r ; b u t t h e m u s e u m is e q u a l l y i m p o r t a n t a s a n i l l u s t r a t i v e m e t a p h o r f o r t h e p r o c e s s o f t r a v e l w r i t i n g i t s e l f a s it g a t h e r s , o b s e r v e s , a n d reifies i t s c u l t u r a l l y " o t h e r e d " s u b j e c t s . 9. S e e , f o r e x a m p l e , t h e d u b i o u s l y c a t h a r t i c e n d i n g o f The Songlines, a t o n g u e - i n - c h e e k p a e a n t o a " d y i n g " p e o p l e , o b v i o u s l y c a m p in sensibility, w h i c h turns a p s e u d o m y s t i c a l a p p r e c i a t i o n f o r A b o r i g i n a l A u s t r a l i a i n t o a n o t h e r aestheticized c a m e o o f a " w o n d r o u s " n o m a d i c race. 10. O n t h e d u t i e s a n d s y m b o l i c i m p o r t a n c e o f t h e s q u i r e , see C a s t r o n o v o , e s p . 79-80,102-4. 11. F o r a n e x t e n d e d d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e n o t i o n o f c o n s p i c u o u s c o n s u m p t i o n , see V e b l e n ' s classic s t u d y The Theory of the Leisure Class. V e b l e n ' s w o r k c l e a r l y u n d e r s c o r e s M a c C a n n e l l ' s s o c i o a n t h r o p o l o g i c a l a p p r o a c h t o t o u r i s m (see The Tourist 11-12). T o u r i s m is o f c o u r s e i t s e l f a m o d e o f c o n s u m p t i o n , b o t h l i t e r a l l y (the p u r c h a s e o f g o o d s a n d services) a n d m e t a p h o r i c a l l y (the practice o f "sightsee i n g " ) . T h e c o n s p i c u o u s c o n s u m p t i o n o f l e i s u r e i n M a y l e ' s P r o v e n c e n a r r a t i v e s is literalized i n the g o u r m e t meal. 12. C o n t i n u i n g i n t h e t r a d i t i o n o f t h e t r a v e l o g u e - a s - c o o k b o o k a r e T o m H i g g i n s , Spotted Dick, S'il Vous Plait (1995), a q u i r k y a c c o u n t o f t h e a u t h o r ' s first e i g h t y e a r s as a n E n g l i s h r e s t a u r a n t e u r i n L y o n ( i n c l u d i n g t w e l v e r e c i p e s ) ; P e t e r B i d d l e c o m b e , Travels with My Briefcase (1994), w h e r e t h e a u t h o r ' s b u s i n e s s t r i p s p r o v i d e t h e p r e t e x t f o r a series o f s u c c u l e n t e x p e n s e - a c c o u n t d i n n e r s ; a n d , n o t least, M a y l e h i m s e l f , w h o s e Acquired Tastes (1993) f u r t h e r s t h e s e a r c h u n d e r t a k e n in t h e P r o v e n c e b o o k s f o r g e n t l e m a n l y l u x u r y b y t a k i n g v i c a r i o u s p l e a s u r e i n t h e e x t r a v a g a n t s p e n d i n g — a n d , p a r t i c u l a r l y , e a t i n g — h a b i t s o f t h e r i c h . F i n a l l y , see a l s o P e t e r R o b b , Midnight in Sicily (1996)—discussed i n t h e p o s t s c r i p t t o t h i s b o o k — w h e r e the author's strongly aestheticized descriptions o f traditional Italian cuisine are h e l d i n c o u n t e r p o i n t t o his a c c o u n t s o f M a f i a violence. 13. S e e t h e c h a p t e r o n N a i p a u l , " O r i g i n a r y D i s p l a c e m e n t a n d t h e W r i t e r ' s Burden," in Porter. 14. F o r a t h o r o u g h g o i n g c r i t i q u e o f N a i p a u l ' s t r a v e l w r i t i n g , see N i x o n , Lon don Calling. A s N i x o n p o i n t s o u t , N a i p a u l ' s a n t i - i m p e r i a l i s t s t a n c e is i n e v i t a b l y c o m p r o m i s e d b y h i s a m b i v a l e n t s u b j e c t p o s i t i o n as t h e F i r s t W o r l d ' s e x p e r t o n t h e T h i r d W o r l d a n d as a n e x p a t r i a t e c u l t u r a l c r i t i c . 15. F o r a c r i t i q u e o f N a i p a u l ' s v i e w o f h i m s e l f a s a u b i q u i t o u s e x i l e , see N i x o n , London Calling, e s p . c h a p . 1. 16. O n N a i p a u l ' s " m i m i c r y t h e s i s , " a n d t h e ( o f t e n h e a t e d ) r e s p o n s e t o it i n t h e ( " a r i b b e a n , see F f u g g a n , " A T a l e o f T w o P a r r o t s " a n d , p a r t i c u l a r l y , W a l c o t t . 17. O n N a i p a u l ' s p e r c e p t i o n o f t h e d i l e m m a o f " h i s t o r y l e s s n e s s " i n t h e < ' a r i b b e a n r e g i o n , see h i s c o n t r o v e r s i a l h i s t o r i c a l s t u d y The Middle Passage, e s p . 1110 i n t r o d u c t i o n . 18. F o r a s a m p l e o f r e c e n t c r i t i q u e s o f t h e t o t a l i z i n g t e n d e n c i e s o f p o s t c o l o nial t h e o r y a n d c r i t i c i s m , see A h m a d ' s e s s a y " P o s t c o l o n i a l i s m : W h a t ' s i n a N a m e ? " m i d M v C ' l i n l o c k ' R a n d S h o h u t ' s e s s a y s i n a s p e c i a l issue, d e v o t e d m a i n l y in A h m a d , o f Social Test ( I W T ll lias a r g u a b l y b e c o m e m o r e f a s h i o n a b l e t o M O T I I I S 1 •• t ' A t . i '• | S ' 4 >•
a t t a c k p o s t c o l o n i a l i s m t h a n t o d e f e n d it; b u t i n spite ( o r p o s s i b l y because?) o f this, p o s t c o l o n i a l studies prospers. 19. F o r a n e x p l o r a t i o n o f t h i s d i s c r e p a n c y , see A p p i a h ' s c h a p t e r " T h e P o s t m o d e r n a n d t h e P o s t c o l o n i a l " i n Africa in the Philosophy of Culture. 20. S e e , f o r e x a m p l e , B r y s o n , Neither Here Nor There (1991); a n d T h e r o u x , The Pillars of Hercules: A Grand Tour of the Mediterranean (1995). S e e a l s o , o n t h e g r a n d t o u r , P o r t e r ; L e e d , 184-85; a n d B u z a r d , 97-110. 21. S e e t h e title e s s a y o f R u s h d i e ' s c o l l e c t i o n Imaginary Homelands, w h e r e h e d e s c r i b e s h i m s e l f as a " l i t e r a r y m i g r a n t , " a p r o d u c t o f c u l t u r a l t r a n s p l a n t a t i o n a n d o f t h e " l i t e r a r y c r o s s - p o l l i n a t i o n " o f a n i n t e r n a t i o n a l e r a (20-21). F o r a c r i t i q u e o f t h i s p o s i t i o n , a n d o f t h e c o s m o p o l i t a n p r i v i l e g e s i t d i s g u i s e s , see B r e n n a n , Salman Rushdie and the Third World; a l s o H u g g a n ' s " T h e P o s t c o l o n i a l E x o t i c , " w h i c h d i s cusses t h e i m p l i c a t i o n s o f R u s h d i e ' s s t a t u s as a b e l e a g u e r e d c e l e b r i t y . 22. S e e , p a r t i c u l a r l y , The Satanic Verses (1988), w h i c h is, a m o n g m a n y o t h e r things, a ludic allegory o f the d e m o n i z a t i o n o f British immigrants. 23. S e e , f o r e x a m p l e , t h e s o m e w h a t n a i v e c e l e b r a t i o n o f " m i g r a n c y " i n C h a m b e r s . A s C a r e n K a p l a n p o i n t s o u t i n Questions of Travel, t h e f a s h i o n a b l e t h e o r i e s s u r r o u n d i n g t h e figure o f t h e d i a s p o r i c m i g r a n t m a y b e l i t t l e m o r e t h a n p o s t m o d e r n u p d a t e s o f e a r l i e r , e q u a l l y u n c r i t i c a l , n o t i o n s o f t h e m o d e r n i s t e x i l e (140). S u c h theories, in i n v o k i n g t h e universal poststructuralist m a n t r a o f "displace m e n t , " risk " o b f u s c a t i n g a n d e v e n erasing the r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f social relations i n h i s t o r i c a l l y g r o u n d e d a n d p o l i t i c a l l y m e a n i n g f u l w a y s " (140). F o r f u r t h e r d i s c u s s i o n s o f " m i g r a n c y " a n d / a s " d i s p l a c e m e n t , " see c h a p t e r s 3 a n d , e s p e c i a l l y , 4 o f t h i s book. 24. S a i d ' s e s s a y is t h e ( d i r e c t o r i n d i r e c t ) i n s p i r a t i o n b e h i n d a w h o l e n e w s c h o o l o f c u l t u r a l critics w h o practice " t r a v e l i n g t h e o r y , " G e o r g e s v a n d e n Abbeele, C a r e n K a p l a n , James Clifford, Iain C h a m b e r s , and R e y C h o w a m o n g t h e m . F o r a n o v e r v i e w , see C l i f f o r d , Routes; K a p l a n , Questions of Travel; a n d t h e essays i n C l i f f o r d a n d D h a r e s h w a r . 25. S e e , p a r t i c u l a r l y , t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n a n d " T h e S c o p e o f O r i e n t a l i s m " i n S a i d ' s Orientalism. A l t h o u g h it h a s a t t r a c t e d a g o o d d e a l o f n e g a t i v e c r i t i c i s m , t h i s r e m a i n s o n e o f the f o u n d a t i o n texts f o r c o n t e m p o r a r y postcolonial studies. 26. S e e t h e s e c t i o n o n " i m a g i n a t i v e g e o g r a p h y " i n Orientalism, 49-72. I m a g i n a t i v e g e o g r a p h y , f o r S a i d , p r o v i d e s a n e x p a n s i v e i m a g e - r e p e r t o i r e t h a t legiti mates distinctions b e t w e e n t h e familiar, " i n s i d e " spaces o f d o m i n a n t (imperial) cultures a n d the " o u t e r " reaches o f the " b a r b a r i a n s " w h o s e territories they i n v a d e a n d w h o s e cultures t h e y subjugate. A s S a i d suggests, a n d as h i s f o l l o w e r s (e.g., B e h d a d ) h a v e g o n e o n t o d e m o n s t r a t e i n m o r e detail, travel writing—particularly E u r o p e a n travel w r i t i n g — h a s tended t o bolster preconceived cultural distinctions: it h a s s e r v e d as a v e h i c l e o f " i m a g i n a t i v e g e o g r a p h y " t h a t a n s w e r s t h e d o m i n a n t culture's needs. 27. S e v e r a l c o n t e m p o r a r y t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s h a v e c o n t r i b u t e d t o p o p u l a r m y t h s o f A s i a n a s c e n d a n c y : see, f o r e x a m p l e , W i n c h e s t e r , Pacific Rising, a n d Viviano. 28. R o b e r t s ' s w o r k , c u r r e n t l y i n p r o g r e s s , c h a r t s t h e t r a n s i t i o n f r o m E u r o p e a n " p l a n e t a r y c o n s c i o u s n e s s " ( P r a t t , Imperial Eyes 9 10) t o I h e t r a n s n a t i o n a l " g l o b a l i m a g i n a r y , " s e e i n g t h e b o o m in t r a v e l w r i t i n g a n d t o u r i s m i n g e n e r a l as s y m p t o m s o f a p o s t m o d e r n c o n d i t i o n in w h i c h O u t c a p i t a l i s t w o r l d - s y s t e m p r o d u c e s a n d m a n i p u l a t e s i m a m ' s (if H " g l o b i i l c u l t u n ,"
29. T i m o t h y B r e n n a n , i n At Home in the World (1997), t a k e s t h i s c r i t i c i s m f u r t h e r , s e e i n g I y e r ( a n d o t h e r t r a v e l w r i t e r s l i k e h i m ) as e n d o r s i n g a Utopian g l o b a l i s m t h a t f a i l s t o a c k n o w l e d g e its o w n , p o i n t e d l y E u r o - A m e r i c a n , f r a m e o f c u l t u r a l r e f e r e n c e . F o r B r e n n a n , I y e r ' s t r a v e l writing f u s e s a n a i v e l y " u p - t o - d a t e " i n t e r n a t i o n a l i s m w i t h a n o s t a l g i c " c o l o n i a l e r o t i c s . " T h e r e s u l t is a r e f a s h i o n e d e x o t i c i s m , m o r e c o n t i n u o u s w i t h imperialisms o f the past t h a n critical o f i m p e r i a l i s m s o f the p r e s e n t , a n d w h o l l y c o m p l i c i t w i t h t h e g l o b a l p r o c e s s o f A m e r i c a n i z a t i o n it c l a i m s to resist. W h i l e B r e n n a n ' s c r i t i c i s m s h a v e s o m e v a l i d i t y , his a r g u m e n t is w e a k e n e d b y h i s t e n d e n c y t o c o n t r a s t w r i t e r s like I y e r , s e l f - s e r v i n g c o s m o p o l i t a n s , w i t h w r i t ers like R u s h d i e , D o r f m a n , a n d G o r d i m e r , w h o s e t r a v e l o g u e s t a k e t h e f o r m o f p o l i t i c a l i n t e r v e n t i o n s . A s w i t h t h e e x a m p l e o f The Jaguar Smile, a n a l y z e d e a r l i e r in t h i s c h a p t e r , s u c h d i s t i n c t i o n s — p r e s u m a b l y b a s e d o n p o l i t i c a l s t a n c e a n d d e g r e e o f p e r c e i v e d c o m m i t m e n t — a r e c o m p l i c a t e d b y a g e n r e t h a t t e n d s (as B r e n n a n r e c ognizes) t o aestheticize the dispossessed. 30. T h e t r a v e l " z o n e s " s e l e c t e d f o r d i s c u s s i o n i n t h e f o l l o w i n g c h a p t e r a r e i n t e n d e d t o p r o v i d e s o m e b a l a n c e ; c o m p r e h e n s i v e c o v e r a g e is o u t o f t h e q u e s t i o n , t h o u g h , so t o s o m e e x t e n t t h e " z o n e s " c h o s e n reflect t h e a u t h o r s ' c u r r e n t i n t e r e s t s and preferences. T h e popularity o f particular " z o n e s " — a n d t h e narratives attached t o t h e m — s h i f t s according t o fashion, a recent instance being the spate o f I ravel b o o k s ( n o t a b l y J o n K r a k a u e r ' s ) o n M o u n t E v e r e s t expeditions.
C H A P T E R T W O 1. F o r a r a t h e r d i f f e r e n t , b u t i n f l u e n t i a l u s a g e , see a l s o P r a t t ' s i n v o c a t i o n o f the " c o n t a c t z o n e " i n Imperial Eyes. T h e c o n t a c t z o n e is " a n a t t e m p t t o i n v o k e t h e spatial a n d t e m p o r a l copresence o f subjects p r e v i o u s l y separated b y g e o g r a p h i c a l II n d h i s t o r i c a l d i s j u n c t u r e s , a n d w h o s e t r a j e c t o r i e s n o w i n t e r s e c t . . . . A ' c o n t a c t ' perspective e m p h a s i z e s h o w subjects are constituted i n a n d b y their relations t o each other. I t treats the relation a m o n g colonizers a n d c o l o n i z e d , o r travelers a n d 'Inivelees,' n o t i n terms o f separateness o r apartheid, b u t i n terms o f copresence, interaction, interlocking understandings a n d practices, often within radically a s y m m e t r i c a l r e l a t i o n s o f p o w e r " (7). P r a t t ' s " z o n e " e m p h a s i z e s , t o a g r e a t e r extent t h a n M c H a l e ' s , t h e often intricate w o r k i n g s o f (imperial) p o w e r ; like M e l l a l e ' s , h o w e v e r , it is a site o f c o n t e n t i o n , o f c o n t i n u a l r e n e g o t i a t i o n : it is shaped a n d r e s h a p e d b y a h i s t o r y o f social interaction a n d ideological conflict. 2. T h e B e l g i a n C o n g o (1908-60) t o o k t h e n a m e Z a i r e i n 1971. O n M a y 17, i')97 after a p e r i o d o f instability a n d internal resistance t o M o b u t u — i t b e c a m e 1 lie D e m o c r a t i c R e p u b l i c o f t h e C o n g o . 3. H y l a n d d e s c r i b e s h i s A f r i c a n j o u r n e y a s " t r a n s g r e s s i n g t h e h o t l i m i t " I) 1 22), b o r r o w i n g t h e p h r a s e t h e " h o t l i m i t " l o o s e l y f r o m C a m o e s ' s Os Lusiades, 1 lie s i x t e e n t h - c e n t u r y P o r t u g u e s e e p i c p o e m . F o r C a m o e s , w h a t w a s l a t e r t o I income C o n r a d ' s / M a r l o w ' s " d a r k " river h a d never before been "seen b y t h e II i i e i e n l s " ; this c o n v e n i e n t l y c l e a r s t h e w a y f o r C a m o e s t o c e l e b r a t e t h e " d i s c o v e r y " n i l he C o n g o b y t h e P o r t u g u e s e e x p l o r e r G i o r g i o C a o i n 1482. 4. O n t h e p r e v a l e n c e o f " l o w , " d e m o n i z e d i m a g e s ( s t r a t e g i e s o f " d e b a s e i i i e n l " a n d " a b j e c t i o n " ) i n c o l o n i a l d i s c o u r s e s , see S p u r r . 5. F o r 11 f u r t h e r d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e i m p a c t o f N a i p a u l ' s c o l o n i a l b a c k g r o u n d m i Ins t r a v e l w r i t i n g , see N i x o n , London Calling, a n d t h e s e c t i o n o n N a i p a u l ' s The h'nifiiiiti of Ai•rival in t h e p i e v i o u s c h a p t e r o f this h o o k . N<
1
1
1
t I<
1 I' A < , | ( 8 f > . |
/ 1
/
6. F o r a m o r e r e c e n t c h r o n i c l e o f a n E a s t A f r i c a n t r i p t i n d e r t h e s i g n o f A I D S , see C o n o v e r . 7. S e e , p a r t i c u l a r l y , L e v i - S t r a u s s ' s l a n d m a r k Tristes Tropiques. D r a w i n g o n a E u r o p e a n t r a d i t i o n o f m y t h i c i z i n g t h e A m a z o n , Tristes Tropiques h a s i t s e l f become a mythical text for a w h o l e n e w school o f e n v i r o n m e n t a l l y - m i n d e d travel w r i t e r s . F o r f u r t h e r b a c k g r o u n d o n m y t h s o f t h e A m a z o n , see S l a t e r ; see a l s o t h e discussion o f "ecotravel w r i t i n g " i n chapter 4 o f this b o o k . 8. S e e , f o r e x a m p l e , C a h i l l ' s d i s p a t c h e s f r o m t h e j u n g l e i n Jaguars Ripped My Flesh (1996) a n d A Wolverine Is Eating My Leg (1994). L i k e O ' H a n l o n ( a n d s o m a n y others), Cahill takes inspiration f r o m C o n r a d , accentuating the dangers o f t h e j u n g l e b u t a l s o its c a p a c i t y f o r f a r c e a n d h i g h j i n k s . A l s o l i k e O ' H a n l o n . C a h i l l stresses t h e p h y s i c a l i t y o f t r a v e l , f a v o r i n g a w a g g i s h v o y e u r i s m a n d a ( d u b i o u s ) taste f o r the scatological j o k e . U n l i k e O ' H a n l o n ' s , h o w e v e r , C a h i l l ' s b o o k s are n o t sustained picaresque narratives, but collections o f — o f t e n irreverent—journalistic reports ranging b r o a d l y in time a n d space. 9. B o t h In Trouble Again a n d Into the Heart of Borneo i n c l u d e f a i r l y e x t e n sive bibliographies; O ' H a n l o n , f o r all his faults, c a n n o t be accused o f n o t h a v i n g d o n e his h o m e w o r k . 10. O ' H a n l o n d r a w s m o s t o b v i o u s l y o n t h e w o r k o f N a p o l e o n C h a g n o n , w h o s e sensationalist account o f Y a n o m a m i aggression has p r o v e n p o p u l a r w i t h A m a z o n travel writers. O ' H a n l o n ' s u n a s h a m e d l y a m a t e u r a n t h r o p o l o g y also h i n t s , h o w e v e r , a t t h e w o r k o f e a r l i e r e v o l u t i o n a r y a n t h r o p o l o g i s t s , s u c h as E d w a r d T y l o r , w h o s e i n f l u e n t i a l t r e a t i s e o n ' " p r i m i t i v e " c u l t u r e is m u c h i n v o k e d b u t l i t t l e u n d e r s t o o d . O ' H a n l o n ' s u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f a n t h r o p o l o g y is b y n o m e a n s as n a i v e as his n a r r a t i v e i m p l i e s ; h e is p r o f i t i n g , h e r e as e l s e w h e r e , f r o m t h e r h e t o r i c a l s t a n c e o f t h e f a u x n a i f (as a l s o s u g g e s t e d i n t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n t o t h i s b o o k ) . S e e also P o r t e r ' s c o m m e n t , i n his c h a p t e r o n D a r w i n , t h a t " t h e p r o f e s s i o n a l naturalist [often] turns out t o be . . . a perceptive a m a t e u r e t h n o g r aph e r, w h o c o m m e n t s o n r a c i a l o r c u l t u r a l d i f f e r e n c e as w e l l a s o n d i v e r s e f o r m s o f c o l l e c t i v e b e h a v i o r o r s o c i a l o r g a n i z a t i o n " (148). O ' H a n l o n is w e l l a w a r e o f his l i m i t a t i o n s as a n e t h n o g r a p h e r , b u t , l i k e m a n y o t h e r t r a v e l w r i t e r s , h e c a n n o t resist a n o b s e r v a t i o n o r t w o a g a i n s t his b e t t e r j u d g m e n t . 11. O n t h e " s c i e n t i f i c t r a v e l e r - w r i t e r , " see P o r t e r ' s c h a p t e r o n D a r w i n ; c h a p t e r 1 o f P r a t t ' s Imperial Eyes; c h a p t e r 7 o f L e e d ' s The Mind of the Traveler; a n d P e t e r R a b y ' s Bright Paradise. I t is a s c o m m o n f o r t r a v e l w r i t e r s t o d i s g u i s e t h e i r s c i e n t i f i c a u t h o r i t y a s t o i n v o k e it- - a s t r a t e g y t h a t s u p p o r t s t h e i r a d v a n t a g e o u s rhetorical p o s i t i o n as i n q u i r i n g a m a t e u r s . F o r a discussion o f t h e rhetorical b e n e f i t s o f ( d i s s i m u l a t e d ) " a m a t e u r i s m , " see t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n t o t h i s b o o k a n d , e s p e c i a l l y , t h e s e c t i o n o n E r i c N e w b y i n c h a p t e r 1. 12. O n " w i l d n e s s " i n a n A m a z o n i a n c o n t e x t , see T a u s s i g . 13. T h e r e a r e m a n y i m a g e / m y t h p a t t e r n s i n t h e W e s t e r n r e p e r t o i r e o f J a p a n o t h e r t h a n t h a t o f t h e e r o t i c i z e d O r i e n t : f o r e x a m p l e , a m a s c u l i n e J a p a n o f fe'Ctdal h i e r a r c h y a n d m i l i t a r i s m , o r a d e m o n i z e d J a p a n o f g r o t e s q u e m o n s t e r s (see B u r u m a ) . I n t h e case o f W e s t e r n l i t e r a r y r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s o f J a p a n , t h e s e l e c t i o n o f a n e r o t i c p a r a d i g m n o t o n l y reflects a d o m i n a n t s t r a i n i n t r a v e l w r i t i n g , b u t a l s o signals the W e s t ' s inability t o deal w i t h the c o m p l e x i t y o f a range o f n o n i d e n t i c a l cultural characteristics. 14. F o r a d i s c u s s i o n o f I ,oli"s oil KM- ortilir n a i n i l i v e s , see Umifiir. "/<) 1116. Null
, HI I' H , H S
15. S e e K a o r i O ' C o n n o r ' s i n t r o d u c t i o n t o L o t i , Madame Chrysanthemum, e s p . 5. 16. P a r t i c u l a r l y i n f l u e n t i a l a m o n g t h e s e w a s L a f c a d i o H e a r n , w h o s e s u r p r i s ingly full a n d c o m p l e x c o m m e n t a r i e s o n J a p a n w e r e r e a c h i n g A m e r i c a i n the late n i n e t e e n t h c e n t u r y . T h e r a n g e o f these c o m m e n t a r i e s — a l o n g w i t h H e a r n ' s m o d esty—detracted f r o m their ability t o "fix" a singular i m a g e o f J a p a n f o r m a n y W e s t e r n readers. See F r a n c i s K i n g ' s representative selection o f H e a r n ' s w o r k i n Writings from Japan. 17. J e a n - P i e r r e L e h m a n n h a s p r o v i d e d a u s e f u l a c c o u n t o f t h e s t o r y ' s t r a n s m i s s i o n , a n d o f its v a r i o u s t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s , i n his e s s a y " I m a g e s o f t h e O r i e n t , " i n a s p e c i a l issue o f Opera Guide. T h e t e x t o f J o h n L u t h e r L o n g ' s s t o r y " M a d a m e Butterfly" can be f o u n d in the same v o l u m e . T r a n s f e r r e d f r o m J a p a n t o V i e t n a m , a n d f r o m the late nineteenth t o the late t w e n t i e t h c e n t u r y , the story o f the a b a n d o n e d O r i e n t a l w o m a n c o n t i n u e s t o h o l d s w a y i n t h e p o p u l a r m u s i c a l Miss Saigon. 18. A p o p u l a r n a r r a t i v e i n t h i s v e i n is M a r k S a l z m a n ' s Iron & Silk (1986). S a l z m a n , a martial-arts e x p e r t , t a u g h t E n g l i s h i n C h i n a in the early eighties, t h e n s t a r r e d i n a m a r t i a l - a r t s m o v i e b e f o r e m o v i n g b a c k t o his n a t i v e U n i t e d S t a t e s . 19. F o r a c o m p a r i s o n o f Empire of Signs w i t h o t h e r O r i e n t a l i s t n a r r a t i v e s b y F r e n c h p o s t s t r u c t u r a l i s t w r i t e r - i n t e l l e c t u a l s , see L o w e , e s p . c h a p . 5. 20. O n C o o k a n d t h e P a c i f i c , see t h e w o r k o f B e r n a r d S m i t h ; see a l s o t h e often ill-tempered exchange between t h e anthropologists M a r s h a l l Sahlins a n d G a n a n a t h O b e y e s e k e r e o v e r the m y t h i c a l status o f C o o k . 21. S e e , f o r e x a m p l e , t h e d i s c u s s i o n o f J o a n a V a r a w a ' s " e t h n o g r a p h i c " t r a v e l w r i t i n g , a n d o f its i n d e b t e d n e s s t o M e a d , i n c h a p t e r 3 o f t h i s b o o k . F o r a c r i t i c a l v i e w , see a l s o A l b e r t W e n d t ' s e s s a y " T o w a r d A N e w O c e a n i a . " W e n d t , a n a t i v e S a m o a n , c o m p l a i n s b i t t e r l y a b o u t t h e m y t h o l o g i z i n g o f t h e " S o u t h S e a s " as a site for ethnographic voyeurism a n d commercialized E u r o - A m e r i c a n fantasy. Several o f t h e s e m y t h s a r e c r i t i c a l l y a n a l y z e d i n N e i l R e n n i e ' s Far-Fetched Facts. 22. F o r a f u l l e r , F o u c a u l t - i n f l e c t e d d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e e m e r g e n c e o f a n e w knowledge-regime in eighteenth-century E u r o p e , focusing particularly o n t h e i n t e r s e c t i o n s b e t w e e n g e o g r a p h y , a n t h r o p o l o g y , a n d t r a v e l o b s e r v a t i o n , see G r e g o r y , e s p . 16-30. 23. T h e r o u x is o n e o f t h e m o s t s e l f - r e f l e x i v e o f c o n t e m p o r a r y t r a v e l w r i t e r s ; f o r a n a n a l y t i c a l o v e r v i e w o f his o f t e n s e l f - i r o n i c c o m m e n t a r i e s , see G l a s e r , " T h e Self-Reflexive T r a v e l e r , " a n d also G l a s e r ' s " P a u l T h e r o u x a n d t h e P o e t r y o f Departures." 24. S e e B o n g i e ' s Exotic Memories f o r a t h o r o u g h i n v e s t i g a t i o n o f ( m o d e r n ) W e s t e r n e x o t i c m y t h s ; see a l s o t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n t o t h i s b o o k f o r f u r t h e r d i s c u s s i o n s o f e x o t i c i s m — t h a t a m b i v a l e n t discourse o f the " o t h e r " that underpins so m u c h travel writing. 25. I t is w o r t h n o t i n g h e r e , as i n m u c h o f T h e r o u x ' s t r a v e l w r i t i n g , a p u r g a t o rial t i n g e ; t h i s b e c o m e s m o r e p r o m i n e n t i n t h e w r i t e r s o f A r c t i c t r a v e l d i s c u s s e d later in this c h a p t e r . 26. W o o d c o c k p e r f o r m s a s i m i l a r e l e g i z i n g a c t o n a n o l d b e a c h c o m b e r i n S a m o a : " I w o n d e r e d w h e t h e r h e w a s r e a l l y . . . t h e last o f t h o s e w a n d e r i n g M e l v i l l e a n s a i l o r s , f e t c h e d u p a t last t o d i e u p o n s o m e d i s t a n t s t r a n d , o r w h e t h e r h e w a s a M e n d e l i a n t h r o w b a c k , g r a n d s o n o r great-grandson o f the original b e a c h c o m b e r , his l o n g l i n e t a k e n i n t o t h e a b s o r b e n t a n d i n f i n i t e l y t o l e r a n t f a b r i c o f f a ' a S a m o a " <"/<>>.
NO'i ,
I-N
111
1 • \ < , 1 s S..'
.)
,
• MI
,,. .ill.i'lu
27. O n b e l a t e d n e s s , see t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n t o this b o o k , w h i c h d r a w s o n t h e w o r k of, a m o n g others, A l i B e h d a d . 28. O n t h e s y m b i o t i c r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n e x o t i c i s m a n d n o s t a l g i a , see B o n g i e , particularly the chapter o n C o n r a d . T h e nostalgic impulses o f travel writ i n g a r e d i s c u s s e d s e v e r a l t i m e s i n t h i s b o o k : see t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n , f o r e x a m p l e , o r t h e t r e a t m e n t o f N e w b y ' s a n d O ' H a n l o n ' s w o r k in c h a p t e r 1. 29. T h e C a n a d i a n R o n a l d W r i g h t , a u t h o r o f t h e a c c l a i m e d Time among the Maya, s e e m s o b s e s s e d b y t h e p r o t o c o l s s u r r o u n d i n g h o s p i t a l i t y a n d t h e e x c h a n g e o f g i f t s . S e e , f o r e x a m p l e , W r i g h t ' s t r a v e l o g u e On Fiji Islands (1986), w h e r e h i s g i f t g i v i n g , l i k e T h e r o u x ' s , is p e r h a p s i n t e n d e d t o d i m i n i s h h i s p r i v i l e g e w h i l e a t t e m p t ing t o gain insider status. W h i l e travel b o o k s , despite appearances, rarely c o m m u nicate B a k h t i n i a n " h e t e r o g l o s s i a " — a multiplicity o f languages a n d viewpoints— t h e y c a n a n d o c c a s i o n a l l y d o c o n v e y a degree o f " s u b a l t e r n resistance" ( G u h a ) , as in t h e u n e x p e c t e d r e b u f f t h a t so irritated T h e r o u x . F o r a discussion o f t h e rele v a n c e o f B a k h t i n i a n c o n c e p t s t o c r o s s - c u l t u r a l p e r c e p t i o n a n d r e p r e s e n t a t i o n , see t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n t o J a m e s C l i f f o r d ' s ( m e t a - ) a n t h r o p o l o g i c a l s t u d y , The Predica ment of Culture. C l i f f o r d ' s a r g u m e n t is c l e a r l y r e l e v a n t t o t r a v e l w r i t e r s l i k e W r i g h t a n d T h e r o u x , w h o s e w o r k is o b v i o u s l y i n f l u e n c e d b y r e l a t i v i s t e t h n o g r a p h y . 30. T h e " i n s e a r c h o f t r o p e is a c o m m o n o n e a m o n g c o n t e m p o r a r y t r a v e l writers, w h o frequently h a r k b a c k (sometimes ironically) t o their predecessors. See, f o r e x a m p l e , the discussion o f O ' H a n l o n ' s w o r k i n this c h a p t e r a n d i n c h a p t e r 1. S e e a l s o y e t a n o t h e r C o n r a d i a n t r a v e l b o o k , v e r y m u c h i n t h e s p i r i t o f B e l l ' s : G a v i n Y o u n g ' s In Search of Conrad (1991). 31. S e e H u g h B r o d y , The People's Land (1991), e s p . c h a p . 5, " W h i t e A t t i t u d e s to the limit." 32. F o r f u r t h e r d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e d i s t i n c t i o n b e t w e e n " a r e a ! " a n d " l i n e a r . " see Leer. 33. T h e l i f e w o r l d — a t e r m d e r i v e d f r o m t h e p h e n o m e n o l o g y o f H u s s e r l — i s e x p l a i n e d b y t h e g e o g r a p h e r A n n e B u t t i m e r as " t h e c u l t u r a l l y d e f i n e d s p a t i o t e m p o r a l s e t t i n g o r h o r i z o n o f e v e r y d a y l i f e " (277). F o r a l t e r n a t i v e p e r s p e c t i v e s o n t h e l i f e w o r l d . see t h e e s s a y s i n B u t t i m e r a n d S c a m o n , a n d a l s o t h e " g e o s o p h i c a l " essays i n L o w e n t h a l a n d B o w d e n , especially those b y A l l e n a n d T u a n . F o r a cri t i q u e o f B u t t i m e r ' s a n d T u a n ' s p h e n o m e n o l o g i c a l a p p r o a c h t o g e o g r a p h y , see Pickles. 34. S e e L o p e z ' s d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e m i g r a t o r y p a t t e r n s o f A r c t i c b i r d s a n d a n i m a l s i n c h a p t e r s 3 a n d 5 o f Arctic Dreams. T h e lives o f m a n y o f t h e s e b i r d s a n d a n i m a l s , says L o p e z , " a r e c o n s t r a i n e d b y the schemes o f m e n , b u t the d e t e r m i n a t i o n in their lives, t h e t r a d i t i o n a l p a t t e r n o f m o v e m e n t , are a c a l m i n g r e m i n d e r o f a m o r e f u n d a m e n t a l o r d e r " (155). T h u s , i n a g e s t u r e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f L o p e z ' s p a t tern-seeking narrative, t h e a n i m a l s ' m o b i l i t y consists in their capacity t o repeat their m o v e m e n t s according t o preestablished codes. 35. A l l t h r e e w r i t e r s , b u t m o s t o b v i o u s l y L o p e z , a r e i n f l u e n c e d b y Y i - F u T u a n ' s p h e n o m e n o l o g i c a l g e o g r a p h y : o n e t h a t e m p h a s i z e s t h e effect o f h u m a n perception o n the landscapes that people inhabit a n d , t o some extent, shape a c c o r d i n g t o t h e i r f e a r s a n d d e s i r e s . " T o p o p h i l i a " is a p e r c e p t i o n o f t h e l a n d a s b e n e v o l e n t a n d / o r c u r a t i v e ; it is b a s e d o i l a s p e c i a l a f f i n i t y w i t h c e r t a i n p l a c e s . F o r f u r t h e r d i s c u s s i o n , see t h e o p e n i n g c h a p t e r o f T u n n ' s Topopliilia (1974). 36. A n t a r c t i c a , t h a t t e r r i t o r y a( t h e o t h e r p o l a r l i m i t , is n o w a m u c h - v i s i t e d t r a v e l wrilinjt d e s t i n a t i o n . T h e ill-l'iiU'il S i / o i l e x p e d i t i o n pei l o i ins 11 a i l n l y / n i n rule 31,30
N O ' I
IIS
i n
I'MH'.N
()<>
MM)
similar t o that o f the third F r a n k l i n expedition f o r the Arctic; the literary m o n u m e n t h e r e is A p s l e y C h e r r y - G a r r a r d ' s The Worst Journey in the World ( 1 9 2 2 ) . T h e m o s t recent A n t a r c t i c travel narratives, interestingly, a r e b o t h b y w o m e n . J e n n y D i s k i ' s Skating to Antarctica ( 1 9 9 7 ) m o b i l i z e s t h e e x p e r i e n c e o f t r a v e l t o , a n d i n , A n t a r c t i c a f o r a k i n d o f psychic a r c h a e o l o g y related t o t h e m u s i n g s o f L o p e z . W i e b e , a n d M o s s , w i t h the very starkness o f the visual images m e l d i n g impercepti b l y w i t h states o f i s o l a t i o n a n d d e p r i v a t i o n t o p r o d u c e a s t o r y . I n c o n t r a s t , S a r a W h e e l e r , i n Terra Incognita: Travels in Antarctica ( 1 9 9 6 ) , finds t h a t it is m a l e t e r r i tory, a place w h e r e m e n h a v e i m p o s e d their (imagined) mastery u p o n nature. I n s e v e r a l i m p o r t a n t r e s p e c t s , o f c o u r s e , A n t a r c t i c a d i f f e r s f r o m t h e A r c t i c — n o t least in t h e absence o f a n i n d i g e n o u s p o p u l a t i o n . F r a n c i s S p u f f o r d ' s a c c l a i m e d s t u d y o f t h e p o l a r r e g i o n s i n t h e E u r o p e a n i m a g i n a r y , / May Be Some Time: Ice and the English Imagination ( 1 9 9 6 ) , r e d r e s s e s t h e i m b a l a n c e , i n t r a v e l a c c o u n t s , o f p o l a r discourse. I n c o n f i r m a t i o n o f this b o o k ' s insistence o n t h e close relation b e t w e e n t r a v e l w r i t i n g a n d t h e t r a v e l i n d u s t r y , a L o n e l y P l a n e t Antarctica is n o w o n t h e travel guide shelves i n b o o k s t o r e s . 37. F o r a f u r t h e r d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e d e s i r e t o b e c o m e i n d i g e n o u s , see t h e o p e n i n g c h a p t e r o f G o l d i e ' s Fear and Temptation (1989). S e e a l s o G o l d i e ' s r e a d i n g o f Wiebe's w o r k (191-214).
CHAPTER
THREE
1. I n f a i r n e s s t o P o r t e r , h e is p r i m a r i l y i n t e r e s t e d i n a p s y c h o a n a l y t i c approach to travel writing that explores the "transgressive" relationship between the father a n d his " e r r a n t " son; a n d i n fairness t o L e e d , he does include a chapter entitled " S p a c e a n d G e n d e r : W o m e n ' s M e d i a t i o n s , " in w h i c h he a n a l y z e s w h a t he i n f e l i c i t o u s l y calls " t h e g e n d e r i z a t i o n o f t r a v e l " : t h e i n c r e a s i n g c h a l l e n g e t o p a t r i a r c h a l m y t h s o f s p a c e , b e l o n g i n g , a n d m o v e m e n t t h a t o n c e d e s i g n a t e d t r a v e l as a " m a s c u l i n i z i n g a c t i v i t y " set o v e r a n d a g a i n s t a f e m i n i n i t y o f t e n seen as " r o o t e d i n p l a c e " ( 1 1 6 ) . F u s s e l l is p r o b a b l y t h e w o r s t o f f e n d e r , i m p l y i n g t h a t ( i n t e r w a r B r i t i s h ) " l i t e r a r y t r a v e l i n g " is a n o v e r w h e l m i n g l y m a l e t r a d i t i o n , a n d t h u s o v e r l o o k i n g the i m p o r t a n t w o r k o f . a m o n g several others, F r e y a S t a r k . S a r a Mills, in h e r s t u d y o f w o m e n ' s t r a v e l w r i t i n g , p u t s it b l u n t l y : " F u s s e l l e x p l i c i t l y r e f u s e s t o c o n s i d e r w o m e n t r a v e l w r i t e r s w i t h i n h i s a c c o u n t o f l i t e r a r y t r a v e l , as h e states t h a t they are n o t sufficiently c o n c e r n e d either w i t h travel o r w i t h w r i t i n g i t s e l f (3). 2. S a i d ' s h u g e l y i n f l u e n t i a l w o r k h a s b e e n c h a l l e n g e d b y a n u m b e r o f f e m i nist c r i t i c s f o r its m a s c u l i n i s t a n d / o r h e t e r o s e x u a l a s s u m p t i o n s a b o u t c o l o n i a l e m p l a c e m e n t s o f p o w e r . See, f o r e x a m p l e , t h e criticism o f S a i d b y S a r a Suleri ( w h o s e a u t o b i o g r a p h y Meatless Days w i l l b e a n a l y z e d l a t e r i n t h i s c h a p t e r ) i n The Rhetoric of English India, o r t h e r e j o i n d e r t o S a i d i n J u l i a E m b e r l e y ' s Thresholds of Difference ( 1 9 9 3 ) . 3. F o r a c r i t i c a l a n a l y s i s o f C l i f f o r d ' s w o r k , see Caren K a p l a n , Questions of Travel, e s p . 1 2 7 - 3 9 ; s e e a l s o bell h o o k s ' s c r i t i q u e o f C l i f f o r d ' s i n a t t e n t i o n t o b o t h ( t e n d e r a m i r a c i a l p o l i t i c s . C l i f f o r d a d d r e s s e s s o m e o f I h e s e c r i t i c i s m s in his m o s t
recent b o o k , r e f e r r i n g a p p r o v i n g l y t o t h e w o r k o f . l a n d W o l f f o n m a s c u l i n i s t b i a s e s in 1 h e n r i e s o f t r a v e l , a n d a d m i t t i n g t h e t e n d e n c y f o r " t h e o r e l i c a l a c c o u n t s o f d i a s p o r a * a n d d i a s p o r a : c u l t u r e s to talk o f i n i v e l and d i s p l i i M i n e u t w a y s , i l u i s n i i r n i s d i / i u i t m i d o i ' \ p « i i o i u : e s " (Ruinrx
NIJ'I'HS T O P A U M N I<»> I 1
r\l
in u n m a r k e d
4. S e e , f o r e x a m p l e , E l a i n e S h o w a l t e r ' s d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e " w i l d z o n e " a s a liberated female space. 5. S e e , f o r i n s t a n c e , t h e final s c e n e i n A Short Walk, w h e r e N e w b y a n d C a r less m e e t t h e c e l e b r a t e d e x p l o r e r ( a n d t r a v e l w r i t e r ) W i l f r e d T h e s i g e r . T h e s i g e r , after venting m u c h w r a t h at t h e general decline in British standards, turns his scornful attention t o his t w o awestruck British c o m p a n i o n s . ' " L e t ' s turn in,' he s a i d . . . . T h e g r o u n d w a s l i k e i r o n w i t h s h a r p r o c k s s t i c k i n g u p o u t o f it. W e s t a r t e d to b l o w u p o u r air-beds. ' G o d , y o u m u s t b e a c o u p l e o f pansies,' said T h e s i g e r " (248). S e e a l s o t h e n e x t s e c t i o n o f t h i s c h a p t e r f o r a n e x a m i n a t i o n o f h o m o s e x u a l anxiety in c o n t e m p o r a r y travel writing. 6. S e e S a r a h H o b s o n , Through Persia in Disguise (1973); see a l s o V i r a g o P r e s s ' s r e r e l e a s e d d i a r y o f I s a b e l l e E b e r h a r d t , The Passionate Nomad (1987), a n d t h e b r i e f b u t i n t e r e s t i n g c o m m e n t a r y o n E b e r h a r d t i n G a r b e r , 324-29, 334-36. 7. S e e P a t r i c k H o l l a n d ' s u n p u b l i s h e d e s s a y o n M o r r i s , " ( P o s t ( i m p e r i a l N o s t a l g i a a n d P o s s e s s i o n . " A s H o l l a n d s u g g e s t s , h o w e v e r . M o r r i s ' s sex c h a n g e w a s a n d is a s o u r c e o f f a s c i n a t i o n t o o t h e r s — i n c l u d i n g o t h e r t r a v e l w r i t e r s . J o n a t h a n R a b a n a n d P a u l T h e r o u x , f o r e x a m p l e , b o t h d o c u m e n t their encounters w i t h the p o s t - s e x - c h a n g e M o r r i s . T h e r o u x d i s p l a y s less d e f e r e n c e t h a n h i s y o u n g e r c o l league R a b a n , a l t h o u g h , like R a b a n , he puts the subject o f M o r r i s ' s sex c h a n g e at t h e c e n t e r . W h e r e R a b a n finds M o r r i s w a r m l y a f f a b l e . T h e r o u x d e t e c t s s o m e t h i n g " m a l i c i o u s " i n h e r v o i c e . T h e r e is a l s o a h i n t o f p r o v o c a t i v e a n t a g o n i s m i n T h e r o u x ' s allusions t o t h e sex c h a n g e . I n s p e a k i n g o f W e l s h n a t i o n a l i s m , f o r instance. T h e r o u x s u g g e s t s t h a t it w a s s o m e t i m e s " l i k e a k i n d o f f e m i n i s m , v e r y m o n o t o n o u s a n d o n e - s i d e d " ; w h e n M o r r i s r e p l i e s t h a t t h i s s e e m s t o h e r a v e r y male v i e w o f t h e m a t t e r , T h e r o u x s n a p s b a c k , " D i d n ' t it l o o k t h a t w a y t o y o u w h e n y o u w e r e a m a n ? " — s p i t e f u l l y i m p l y i n g that M o r r i s ' s change has affected her ( " m a l e ' V ' r a t i o n a l " ) a b i l i t y t o see s u c h issues a s n a t i o n a l i s m a n d f e m i n i s m i n t h e i r p r o p e r p e r s p e c t i v e ( f o r f u r t h e r d e t a i l s o f t h e e n c o u n t e r , see T h e r o u x , The Kingdom by the Sea). T h e r o u x ' s a n d R a b a n ' s r e s p e c t i v e e n c o u n t e r s i n d i c a t e t h e — n o t a l w a y s c o r d i a l — c o n n e c t i o n s that several c o n t e m p o r a r y travel writers like t o m a i n t a i n w i t h o n e a n o t h e r . T h e r o u x is p a r t i c u l a r l y f r a c t i o u s : see a l s o t h e testiness u n d e r l y i n g his c o l l a b o r a t i o n w i t h C h a t w i n o n Patagonia Revisited. 8. S e e , f o r e x a m p l e . G a r b e r ' s d i s c u s s i o n o f L a w r e n c e o f A r a b i a , a n d o f o t h e r O r i e n t a l i z e d H o l l y w o o d i c o n s , i n t h e c h a p t e r o f Vested Interests, " T h e C h i c o f A r a b y . " M o r r i s is m e n t i o n e d i n G a r b e r ' s b o o k , t h o u g h n o t i n a n y g r e a t d e t a i l ; b u t w h i l e G a r b e r r e f r a i n s f r o m t r e a t i n g M o r r i s ' s c a s e as a n o v e r s t a t e d t r a n s s e x u a l d r a m a , t h e r e is n o s t r o n g e v i d e n c e t o l i n k M o r r i s , as s h e d o e s , w i t h a " c u l t u r a l f a n t a s y t h a t p l a y e d i t s e l f o u t i n c r o s s - d r e s s i n g " (224). 9. S e e S a i d , Orientalism, e s p . " O r i e n t a l i s m N o w . " I n t e r e s t i n g l y , w i t h r e g a r d t o M o r r i s , S a i d ' s r i c h l y d o c u m e n t e d s t u d y h a s b e e n c r i t i c i z e d f o r its r e l a t i v e l a c k o f a t t e n t i o n t o s e x u a l — p a r t i c u l a r l y h o m o s e x u a l — p o l i t i c s (see a l s o n o t e 2 a b o v e ) . Suleri, w h o tends t o blame Said's followers rather than Said himself, d r a w s atten tion t o the "discourse o f e f f e m i n a c y " that traverses Orientalist representation. T h e " n a r r a t i v e s o f c o l o n i a l i s m . . . a s s u m e [ a ] p r e d o m i n a n t l y h o m o e r o t i c cast . . . [which] further suggests that the m a n i f o l d c o m p l i c a t i o n s that g e n d e r poses t o t h e c u l t u r a l l o c a t i o n o f t h e i m p e r i a l t a l e " (Rhetoric of English India 15-16). F o r a f u r t h e r d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e i m p l i c a t i o n s o f c o l o n i a l i s l h o m o e r o l i c s , see I h e n e x t s e c t i o n o f this c h a p t e r , p a r t i c u l a r l y t h e i i v n l m c n l o f A c k e r l e y ' s Hindoo Holiday.
j ; u
N O run
TO I'AOIW
I I »«•.»>
10. S e e t h e n e x t s e c t i o n o f t h i s c h a p t e r f o r a m o r e e x t e n d e d d i s c u s s i o n o f s o m e o f these " ' m a s k i n g " tactics. 1 1 . Desert Places is t h e title o f D a v i d s o n ' s l a t e s t b o o k ( 1 9 9 6 ) . T2. T h e desert remains a favorite t o p o s o f W e s t e r n travel writers. S e e C h a t w i n ' s The Songlines, f o r i n s t a n c e , a n d C h a t w i n a n d T h e r o u x ' s P a t a g o n i a n narratives. C h a t w i n a n d T h e r o u x b o t h seem t o b e attracted t o P a t a g o n i a f o r the s a m e r e a s o n B o r g e s ( w h o m T h e r o u x m e e t s ) h a t e s it. A s B o r g e s s a y s , ' " [ P a t a g o n i a ] is d r e a r y . . . t h e g a t e o f t h e h u n d r e d s o r r o w s . . . . T h e r e is n o t h i n g i n P a t a g o n i a . It's n o t t h e S a h a r a , b u t i t ' s as c l o s e as y o u c a n g e t t o it i n A r g e n t i n a . N o , t h e r e is n o t h i n g t h e r e " ( q t d . i n Old Patagonian Express 3 7 4 , 3 7 7 ) . Y e t it is p r e c i s e l y t h e u n r e m i t t i n g harshness a n d absence o f features that m a k e the desert so c o m p e l l i n g : as D a v i d s o n s a y s i n Tracks, " T h e s e l f i n a d e s e r t b e c o m e s m o r e a n d m o r e l i k e t h e d e s e r t . I t b e c o m e s l i m i t l e s s , w i t h its r o o t s m o r e i n t h e s u b c o n s c i o u s t h a n t h e c o n scious—it gets s t r i p p e d o f n o n - m e a n i n g f u l h a b i t s a n d b e c o m e s c o n c e r n e d w i t h realities r e l a t e d t o s u r v i v a l . B u t as is its n a t u r e , it d e s p e r a t e l y w a n t s t o a s s i m i l a t e a n d m a k e s e n s e o f t h e i n f o r m a t i o n it r e c e i v e s , w h i c h i n a d e s e r t is a l m o s t a l w a y s g o i n g t o be translated into the l a n g u a g e o f m y s t i c i s m " (197). 13. S e e L u t z a n d C o l l i n s ' s u n c o m p r o m i s i n g s t u d y , Reading National Geo graphic. A s L u t z a n d C o l l i n s s u g g e s t , t h e m a g a z i n e is, b y a n y s t a n d a r d s , a p h e n o m e n a l success s t o r y , r e p r e s e n t i n g f o r i t s A m e r i c a n — a n d . i n c r e a s i n g l y , i n t e r n a t i o n a l — p u b l i c a sanitized e x o t i c w o r l d that c o n f i r m s A m e r i c a n s e l f - w o r t h . See p a r t i c u l a r l y t h e o v e r v i e w c h a p t e r s (1 a n d 2 ) a n d t h e e x t e n d e d a n a l y s i s o f t h e f u n c l i o n o f p h o t o g r a p h y i n c h a p t e r s 3, 4 , a n d 7 . 14. S e e h e r e J a n i c e R a d w a y ' s r e a d i n g o f r o m a n c e a s a p o t e n t i a l l y l i b e r a t i n g form. 1 5 . O n t h e p r o b l e m a t i c r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n t o u r i s m a n d d e v e l o p m e n t , see a l s o M a c C a n n e l l , The Tourist, 1 7 0 - 7 2 , a n d K r o t z . c h a p s . 3 - 7 . 1 6 . S e e B e r n a r d S m i t h . European Vision and the South Pacific ( 1 9 8 5 ) , f o r a d i s tinction between "soft p r i m i t i v i s m " - the native as N o b l e Savage- -and " h a r d p r i m i t i v i s m " — t h e n a t i v e as d e p r a v e d b a r b a r i a n . I t seems likely that the a n t h r o p o l o g y c o u r s e s V a r a w a ( t h e n M c l n t y r e ) t o o k i n C a l i f o r n i a i n t h e sixties d e b u n k e d 1 he p r i m i t i v i s t m y t h s t h a t a r e s o v i g o r o u s l y r e i n s t a l l e d h e r e . V a r a w a ' s " u n c o m m o n a n t h r o p o l o g y , " w i t h its glossary a n d " N o t e s o n C u s t o m s " f o r the l a y m a n , p r o v i d e s a r e m i n d e r o f t h e r a c i s t i m p l i c a t i o n s o f t r a v e l w r i t i n g w h e n it m a s q u e r a d e s as ( p o p u l a r ) e t h n o g r a p h y . B u t it a l s o d r a w s a t t e n t i o n t o t h e e x o t i c i s t p o t e n t i a l t h a t a l r e a d y exists w i t h i n e t h n o g r a p h y , a p o t e n t i a l t h a t V a r a w a seeks, h o w e v e r c r u d e l y , lo exploit. 17. See, for e x a m p l e , Stevenson's colorfully e m b r o i d e r e d novella, " T h e B e a c h o f F a l e s a , " o f w h i c h h e b o a s t e d a t t h e t i m e t h a t h e h a d w r i t t e n " t h e first r e a l i s t i c S o u t h S e a s t o r y " ! O n S t e v e n s o n ' s p e r s o n a l e x p e r i e n c e o f t h e S o u t h S e a s , see a l s o K n i g h t . M e a d ' s r e l e v a n t w o r k i n c l u d e s t h e classic Coming of Age in Samoa, t h e " m e t i c u l o u s n e s s " o f w h i c h has been called in q u e s t i o n , m o s t n o t o r i o u s l y b y D e r e k f r e e m a n . F o r a " c o r r e c t i v e " t o w h a t J a m e s C l i f f o r d has a p t l y called the " c o u n t e r m y t h o l o g i e s " o f M e a d a n d F r e e m a n , see t h e l i t e r a r y a n a l y s e s o f B i l l P e a r s o n a n d , p a r t i c u l a r l y , t h e " c o u n t e r - e t h n o g r a p h i c " fictions o f W e n d t . E l s e w h e r e i n his w o r k , I k - S a m o a a W e n d t h a s g i v e n s h o r t shrift t o H u m - A m e r i c a n t r a v e l w r i t i n g , w h i c h lie 'ires as c o n t i n u i n g t o c o n s p i r e in i m p e r i a l i s t r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s o f t h e S o u t h P a c i f i c ( s e e , particularly, the essay " T o w a r d a N e w ( J e e a n i a " ) . Hut the m y l l i ol'tlic "island
NO'III
M i i s s 1 a 1 >"»7
233
p a r a d i s e , " h o w e v e r t i r e d a n d t i r e s o m e , is still p r o d u c t i v e , as h a s b e e n d e m o n s t r a t e d b y , a m o n g o t h e r s , P a u l T h e r o u x . S e e t h e d i s c u s s i o n o f T h e r o u x ' s The Happy Isles of Oceania i n c h a p t e r 2 o f this b o o k a n d , m o s t r e c e n t l y , D e a B i r k e t t , w h o s e S e r p e n t in P a r a d i s e ( 1 9 9 7 ) p r o v i d e s a u s e f u l a n t i d o t e t o t h e excesses o f I r v i n e a n d V a r a w a . 18. O n t h e p r a c t i c e o f " o t h e r i n g " i n t r a v e l w r i t i n g , see M i l l s , 8 8 - 9 2 . C o n d e n s ing the w o r k o f S a i d , L e v i - S t r a u s s , F a b i a n , P r a t t , a n d others, Mills demonstrates t h a t t h e " o t h e r i n g " p r o c e s s is i n t r i n s i c t o E u r o p e a n t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s , w h i c h t e n d t o assert, explicitly o r i m p l i c i t l y , the s u p r e m a c y o f the traveler-writer's culture, e v e n w h e n t h a t c u l t u r e ( a s i n I r v i n e ' s a n d V a r a w a ' s cases) is s u b j e c t t o c r i t i q u e . O n t h e c o n n e c t i o n b e t w e e n " o t h e r i n g " a n d t h e e t h n i c b o d y , see a l s o L u t z a n d C o l l i n s , e s p . c h a p . 3; T r i n h M i n h - h a , e s p . 7 9 - 1 1 8 ; a n d t h e i n f l u e n t i a l w o r k o f S p i v a k . 19. I n h e r w o r k o n p o s t c o l o n i a l a u t o b i o g r a p h y , L i o n n e t d i s t i n g u i s h e s — p e r h a p s t o o s h a r p l y — b e t w e e n t h e m o r e o r less i n d i v i d u a l i s t i c t r a d i t i o n o f w h i t e W e s t ern a u t o b i o g r a p h y a n d the m o r e c o m m u n i t y - o r i e n t e d autobiographies o f "ethnic" ( n o n - W e s t e r n ) w r i t e r s . F o r f u r t h e r r e l e v a n t d i s c u s s i o n s o f a u t o b i o g r a p h y , see C a r e n K a p l a n ' s a n d W a r l e y ' s e s s a y s i n AIB, a n d t h e e s s a y s i n S m i t h a n d W a t s o n . 2 0 . T h e t e r m " c o u n t e r m e m o r y " is d e r i v e d h e r e f r o m t h e w o r k o f t h e F r e n c h historian M i c h e l F o u c a u l t . F o r F o u c a u l t , c o u n t e r m e m o r y opposes a progressivist view o f history underpinned b y notions o f identity, continuity, a n d tradition. Suleri's text also implicitly u n d e r c u t s this " a n t i q u a r i a n " v i e w o f history, replacing it w i t h t h e d y n a m i c , r a d i c a l l y d i s c o n t i n u o u s m i c r o h i s t o r i e s o f t h e b o d y . 2 1 . T h e q u e s t i o n o f a u d i e n c e is p a r a m o u n t i n a n y s t u d y o f t r a v e l w r i t i n g . S e e the preface o f this b o o k f o r s o m e p r e l i m i n a r y observations, w h i c h are connected t o p e r c e p t i o n s o f t r a v e l a n d t r a v e l w r i t i n g as p o p u l a r p h e n o m e n a . A n i n - d e p t h s t u d y o f audience, similar perhaps to R a d w a y ' s w o r k o n the reception o f r o m a n c e , remains t o be u n d e r t a k e n — s o m e u s e f u l p o i n t e r s a r e p r o v i d e d b y M i l l s i n c h a p t e r 4 o f Dis courses of Difference. T h e d e t a i l e d s o c i o l o g i c a l a p p r o a c h t h a t s u c h a s t u d y r e q u i r e s is u n f o r t u n a t e l y b e y o n d t h e s c o p e o f a n i n t r o d u c t o r y s u r v e y s u c h as this o n e . 2 2 . M i l l s ' s e m p h a s i s is o n t h e r a n g e o f " d i s c u r s i v e p o s s i b i l i t i e s " a n d r o l e s i n w o m e n ' s t r a v e l w r i t i n g . T h i s " d i s c u r s i v e " a p p r o a c h is v a l u a b l e i n c o m p l i c a t i n g , a n d sometimes correcting, naive celebrations o f w o m e n ' s travel/travel writing that c h a m p i o n female bravery. 2 3 . T h e list a b o v e c o u l d o b v i o u s l y be a d d e d t o ; f o r w o m e n ' s t r a v e l w r i t i n g is in a " b o o m " p h a s e , f o r r e a s o n s p a r t l y e x p l a i n e d a b o v e , e v e n i f w o m e n ' s n a r r a t i v e s c o n t i n u e ( f o r r e a s o n s a l s o p a r t l y e x p l a i n e d ) t o b e o u t n u m b e r e d b y m e n ' s . I t is interesting t o note that w o m e n ' s travel writing, t o a far greater extent t h a n men's, is d o m i n a t e d b y t h e a n t h o l o g y ( a r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s e l e c t i o n h e r e m i g h t i n c l u d e M o r ris's Maiden Voyages, d e T e r a n ' s Indiscreet Journeys, G o v i e r ' s Without a Guide: Contemporary Women's Travel Adventures, a n d , m o s t r e c e n t l y , B i r k e t t a n d W h e e l e r ' s Amazonian: The Penguin Book of Women's New Travel Writing). W h i l e t h i s is a s i g n , as p r e v i o u s l y s u g g e s t e d , o f t h e c u r r e n t c o m m o d i f i c a t i o n o f " w o m e n ' s w r i t i n g , " it m i g h t a l s o b e t a k e n as a n i n d i c a t i o n t h a t w o m e n ' s t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s a r e seen as o c c u p y i n g a special p r o v i n c e o f travel w r i t i n g , a n d are thus i m p l i c i t l y f a l s e l y — c o n s i d e r e d as b e i n g less w i d e - r a n g i n g t h a n m e n ' s . F o r f u r t h e r t h o u g h t s o n t h i s issue ( a m o n g o t h e r s ) i n w o m e n ' s t r a v e l w r i t i n g , see K r o l l e r . 2 4 . T h e issue o f t e r m i n o l o g y homosexual, gay, o r queer h a s r e c e n t l y b e c o m e p a r t i c u l a r l y t r i c k y . I n t h e d i s c u s s i o n t h a t f o l l o w s i n this s e c t i o n , homose.s mil a p p e a r s as a p r o v i s i o n a l c a t e g o r y m u r k e r ; gay signifies h o m o s e x u a l (sell'-jpic s e n l a l i o n w h e r e a l i b e r a l i n n i s l inlli-ciuui seems a p p r o p r i a t e ; a n d queer is u s e d t o • ;1
n o ' I i •• 11 >
v 1 . 1 • 1 •:;
', 1
s u g g e s t a p r o v o c a t i v e c o u n t e r d i s c o u r s e . Queer is t h e m o s t p r o b l e m a t i c o f t h e t e r m s , since u n t i l r e c e n t l y it t e n d e d t o s i g n a l t h e t r a n s g r e s s i o n o f b o u n d a r i e s ; its i n e x p l i c i t n e s s , h o w e v e r , f r e q u e n t l y s e p a r a t e s it f r o m c o n t e m p o r a r y d e p l o y m e n t . F o r a g e n e r a l d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e t h r e e t e r m s i n t h e i r h i s t o r i c a l c o n t e x t s , see J a g o s e . 2 5 . A B e l g i a n c h a r a c t e r i n A l a n H o l l i n g h u r s t ' s n o v e l The Folding Star ( 1 9 9 4 ) tells a y o u n g e r E n g l i s h f r i e n d o f his e a r l i e r s e x u a l a t t a c h m e n t t o a n o l d e r , w o r k i n g class m a n : " I ' m s u r e t h e r e w a s t h a t class t h i n g , t o o , w h i c h y o u ' r e s u p p o s e d t o h a v e m u c h w o r s e than u s — t h e place a n d the event conspired t o m a k e m e think o f h i m as a , w h a t ' s t h e w o r d , a w o o d l a n d e r " ( 4 0 8 ) . 26. A c k e r l e y ' s m a l e selection contrasts w i t h that o f F o r s t e r , w h o " u n d e r s t o o d M o h a m m e d a n s as h e d i d n o t u n d e r s t a n d H i n d u s " ( F u r b a n k 2 : 9 9 ) ; i n Hindoo Hol iday, A c k e r l e y ' s M u s l i m t u t o r is t h e r e j e c t e d y o u t h , a f o i l f o r t h e a t t r a c t i v e y o u n g Hindus Sharma and Narayan. 27. Saros C o w a s j e e provides useful i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t A c k e r l e y ' s b o o k a n d its r e c e p t i o n i n his i n t r o d u c t i o n t o a r e p r i n t i n g o f t h e s e c o n d ( 1 9 5 2 ) e d i t i o n , w h i c h was w i t h d r a w n before publication. 2 8 . I n 1985 J o h n F u l l e r " f o u n d " t h e m a n u s c r i p t , d a t e d 1 9 2 9 , i n t h e U n i v e r s i t y o f T e x a s l i b r a r y . I t r e m a i n s u n c l e a r t o w h a t e x t e n t The Temple ( 1 9 8 8 ) is a r e w r i t e o f t h e o r i g i n a l l y u n p u b l i s h e d w o r k o r w h e t h e r it is v i r t u a l l y a n e w n o v e l ; S p e n d e r h i m s e l f h a s . s a i d t h a t h e relied h e a v i l y o n t h e e a r l i e r m a n u s c r i p t f o r t w o s e c t i o n s . B u t h e h a d a l r e a d y sent a n " i n t e r m e d i a t e v e r s i o n " t o A u d e n a n d I s h e r w o o d , a m o n g o t h e r s ; it is e v e n p o s s i b l e t h a t I s h e r w o o d d r e w o n it f o r Goodbye to Berlin, a l t h o u g h it is e q u a l l y l i k e l y t h a t S p e n d e r , i n t u r n , d r e w o n e a r l i e r w o r k b y I s h e r w o o d ( t h e n o v e l t h a t t h e y o u n g B r a d s h a w is w o r k i n g o n as P a u l leaves L o n d o n f o r H a m b u r g m a y w e l l r e p r e s e n t a p r o j e c t o f I s h e r w o o d ' s ) . A t a n y r a t e , t h e r e are c l e a r i n t e r t e x t u a l l i n k s b e t w e e n S p e n d e r ' s w o r k a n d t h a t o f his f r i e n d , p a r t i c u l a r l y i n t h e figure o f O t t o , a n I s h e r w o o d p r o t e g e i n b o t h Goodbye to Berlin a n d The Temple. A l s o c l e a r is t h a t S p e n d e r , r e v i s i t i n g a m a n u s c r i p t piece t h a t h a d p a r t i c i p a t e d i n a shared experience o f E n g l i s h h o m o s e x u a l i t y i n G e r m a n y , heightened the earlier w o r k ' s quotient o f political a n d m o r a l allegory. 2 9 . A n o t h e r p a s s a g e i n H o l l i n g h u r s f s A Folding Star (see n . 2 5 ) s u g g e s t s t h e c o n n e c t i o n : " O n c e i n s i d e t h e h e a v y s o u n d - p r o o f e d d o o r w i t h its little w i r e d j u d a s I w a s i n a p l a c e so f a m i l i a r . . . T h e r e w a s t h e s a m e m a d d e l u s i o n o f g l a m o u r , t h e same over-priced lawdriness, the s a m e ditsy p a r o c h i a l i s m a n d sullen l a r d y q u e e n e r y , a n d u n d e r n e a t h it all t h e s a m e u r g e n c y a n d d e f i a n c e " ( 2 1 ) . 30. A u s t r a l i a n g a y w r i t e r R o b e r t D e s s a i x p e r h a p s e c h o e s B u s i i n h i s p o s t m o d e r n t r a v e l m e m o i r / f i c t i o n Night Letters ( 1 9 9 6 ) . F o r a d i s c u s s i o n o f Night Let ters, see c h a p t e r 4 o f t h i s b o o k . 3 1 . M r a b e t is s o m e w h e r e o n t h e sidelines, r e s i s t i n g m a r g i n a l i z a t i o n , i n m a n y o f t h e i n t e r v i e w s c o l l e c t e d i n C a p o n i ' s Conversations with Paid Bowles ( 1 9 9 3 ) . 32. I n My Kenya Days ( 1 9 9 4 ) , W i l f r e d T h e s i g e r a l s o a u g m e n t s a n d a u t h e n t i cates a h o m o e r o t i c , q u a s i - a n t h r o p o l o g i c a l a c c o u n t o f his t r a v e l s i n E a s t A f r i c a with idealizing photographs o f attractive native y o u t h . ' 33. W h i t e ' s b o o k m a y well b e the inspiration b e h i n d the emergence o f the s u b g e n r e o f " g a y t r a v e l g u i d e s , " a s i g n i f i c a n t c a t e g o r y t h a t is r e l a t e d t o t h e g a y I r a v e l o g u e , b u t is n o t u n d e r s c r u t i n y i n t h i s s t u d y . 34. F o r a n a o c o u n l o f q u e e r p e r f o r m a t i v i t y a n d its c o n t e s t a t i o n s , see J a g o s e , /.'. 1 2 6 . J u d i t h B u t l e r ' s i n f l u e n t i a l Gender Trouble s h o u l d a l s o b e a c k n o w l e d g e d , m i l least for its i i i d i u r i link i n t h e title c h o s e n for this cluipk-i'.
Mm
I'S T O I ' M . U N
1 1.1
35- P a t r i c k L e i g h F e r m o r a r g u a b l y m e r i t s m o r e t h a n a p a s s i n g r e f e r e n c e . P a r t o f the m a n d a r i n tradition o f E n g l i s h gentleman-eccentric-stylists that perhaps cul m i n a t e s i n B r u c e C h a t w i n , h e a c h i e v e d t h e s t a t u s o f m i n o r c u l t figure w i t h t h e a n a c h r o n i s t i c A Time of Gifts (1977). M a r k C o c k e r ' s t r i b u t e is c h a r a c t e r i s t i c : " I n a literary age c o n s u m e d w i t h t h e literary p r i z e , f o u r o f his w o r k s h a v e b e e n h o n o u r e d w i t h s i x a w a r d s . H e is t h e m o s t o b v i o u s h e i r t o [ R o b e r t ] B y r o n ' s p r e - w a r m a n t l e as leading philhellene a m o n g s t British writers a n d as the travel b o o k ' s great stylist" ( C o c k e r 195). 36. T h i s p o i n t e m e r g e s v e r y c l e a r l y f r o m a r e c e n t t r a v e l o g u e , i n w h i c h a h i g h l y a r t i c u l a t e b u t t e m p o r a r i l y d e s t i t u t e g a y m a n t a k e s t o t h e streets a n d r o a d s o f t h e A m e r i c a n S o u t h w e s t . I n Travels with Lizbeth (1993), L a r s E i g h n e r m a k e s a v i r t u e o f e c o n o m i c p o w e r l e s s n e s s , a p p a r e n t l y r e f u s i n g t o enlist h i s s e x u a l e n d o w m e n t s t o p r o d u c e e c o n o m i c g a i n s . H e p r e s e n t s h i m s e l f as e c o n o m i c , n o t g a y , v i c t i m : he c a n t a k e his sexuality f o r g r a n t e d , b u t n o t his joblessness o r his p o v e r t y .
C H A P T E R
F O U R
1. I t is p o s s i b l e t o a r g u e , a l s o , t h a t s p a c e a n d p l a c e h a v e b e c o m e i n c r e a s i n g l y " < f e o n t o l o g i z e d " ; a s U m b e r t o E c o , f o r e x a m p l e , h a s it, " t h e l o g i c a l d i s t i n c t i o n b e t w e e n R e a l W o r l d s a n d P o s s i b l e W o r l d s h a s b e e n d e f i n i t i v e l y u n d e r m i n e d " (14). 2. S e e . f o r e x a m p l e , t h e r e c e n t , c h a r a c t e r i s t i c a l l y s n i d e a c c o u n t s b y B r o o k and Amis. 3. S e c a l s o t h e d i s c u s s i o n o f C h a t w i n ' s w o r k i n c h a p t e r 1 o f this b o o k . 4. F o r a n o t h e r , t h e o r e t i c a l l y i n f l e c t e d a c c o u n t o f " n o m a d i c " c u l t u r e , a l s o d i s t i n c t f r o m C h a t w i n ' s e n t e r p r i s e , see D e l e u z e a n d G u a t t a r i . S e e a l s o A s c h e r s o n ' s h i s t o r y / t r a v e l b o o k Black Sea (1996), e s p . 55-86, f o r a l a y e r e d , h i s t o r i c i z e d d i s c u s s i o n o f n o m a d i s m a n d n o m a d o l o g y . A s c h e r s o n , glancing particularly in Bruce C h a t w i n ' s direction, writes p o i n t e d l y o f " E u r o p e ' s long, unfinished ballad o f y e a r n i n g f o r noble savages, f o r hunter-gatherers i n t o u c h w i t h themselves a n d their ecology, f o r c o w b o y s , cattle-rievers, gypsies a n d C o s s a c k s , f o r B e d o u i n n o m a d s a n d aboriginals w a l k i n g t h e i r s o n g - l i n e s t h r o u g h t h e u n s p o i l e d w i l d e r n e s s " (83). A s c h e r s o n alerts u s t o the t e n d e n c y (present in C h a m b e r s as well as C h a t w i n ) t o a b n e g a t e history a n d context, eliding enforced m i g r a n c y w i t h the " f r e e d o m " o f the n o m a d . 5. N e i t h e r H I V n o r A I D S is e x p l i c i t l y n a m e d a s t h e c o n d i t i o n o f D e s s a i x ' s traveler. Interestingly, as in a surprising n u m b e r o f c o n t e m p o r a r y travel fictions, t h e t r a v e l e r tells a s t o r y a b o u t C h a t w i n t h a t s u g g e s t s t h a t t h e " o u t i n g " o f A I D S , i n t h e c o n t e x t o f t r a v e l , is t r a n s g r e s s i v e : " H a r r y s t a r t e d t e l l i n g t h e s t o r y o f B r u c e C h a t w i n ' s s l o w d e c l i n e . . . . I t w a s a l o n g s t o r y — t h e illness i n I n d i a , t h e t w o - h o u r struggles t o get t o t h e b a t h r o o m a n d b a c k u n a i d e d , e v e r y tiny, ghastly detail. T h e consensus, o f course, w a s that C h a t w i n h a d A I D S , although the m o m e n t H a r r y m e n t i o n e d t h e w o r d o n t h e t e l e p h o n e [ t o C h a t w i n ] , t h e calls c e a s e d . A t a b o o h a d b e e n b r o k e n . V e r y E n g l i s h " ( D e s s a i x 104). F o r a f u r t h e r d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e i m p l i c a t i o n s o f t h e A I D S e p i d e m i c f o r t r a v e l w r i t e r s , see c h a p t e r s 2 a n d 3. 6. D e s s a i x ' s t r a v e l e r b e l i e v e s t h a t " [ t ] h e r e w i l l a l w a y s b e s o m e t h i n g a b o u t the bisexual a n d h o m o s e x u a l male which favours a picaresque existence—and s o m e t h i n g a b o u t a picaresque existence w h i c h will a l w a y s h a v e h o m o s e x u a l o v e r t o n e s " (225). S e e a l s o t h e d i s c u s s i o n o f A l d o B u s i ' s w o r k in c h a p t e r 3 o f I his b o o k . 7. F o r a f u r t h e r d i s c u s s i o n of 1 Ins m c l a l i c t i o n i i l a n d s e l f - r e f l e x i v e a s p e c t s o f I I U T O U X ' S work, see (lie e s s a y s hy t i l a s e r . • |(>
Mini'
1 1 • r \•, 1 •, 1 \ t /
8. O n e e x a m p l e is N a i p a u l ' s The Enigma of Arrival a n a l y z e d i n c h a p t e r i o f this b o o k . 9. O n m i l l e n a r i a n i s m , see C o h n ; see a l s o t h e e s s a y s i n R a b k i n , G r e e n b e r g , and Olander. 10. L e v i - S t r a u s s is a s p e c t r a l f i g u r e h o v e r i n g b e h i n d m u c h o f t h e c o n t e m p o r a r y e n v i r o n m e n t a l l i t e r a t u r e . Tristes Tropiques, i n p a r t i c u l a r , h a s h a d a g r e a t i n f l u e n c e o n w h a t J a m e s C l i f f o r d calls t h o s e " s a l v a g e n a r r a t i v e s " t h a t t a k e it u p o n themselves t o "rescue" e n d a n g e r e d peoples, animals, a n d cultures ( " O n E t h n o g r a p h i c A l l e g o r y " ) . L e v i - S t r a u s s h a d seen h i s f a m o u s e t h n o g r a p h y o f t h e " d e t e r i o r a t i n g " i n d i g e n o u s t r i b e s o f c e n t r a l B r a z i l a s n o t h i n g less t h a n a n a c t o f a t o n e m e n t f o r t h e " c i v i l i z a t i o n " — h i s — t h a t c o r r u p t e d t h e m ; this spiritual d i m e n s i o n , a n d t h e guilty conscience t h a t inspired it, c a n also b e f o u n d i n several c o n t e m p o rary travel narratives that popularize Levi-Strauss's sentiments w i t h o u t imitating his s t r u c t u r a l m e t h o d s . F o r e m o s t a m o n g t h e s e a r e t h e e t h n o g r a p h i c / n a t u r e s t u d i e s o f P e t e r M a t t h i e s s e n , w h o s e e c o l o g i c a l j e r e m i a d The Cloud Forest (1961) w i l l b e dealt w i t h later i n this section. 11. T h e t e r m is e x p l a i n e d m o r e f u l l y i n C l i f f o r d ' s " O n E t h n o g r a p h i c A l l e gory." 12. M a t t h i e s s e n , i n k e e p i n g w i t h s e v e r a l o t h e r p o s t - L e v i - S t r a u s s t r a v e l w r i t ers, l a m e n t s t h e l o s s o f " a u t h e n t i c i t y " t h a t h a s c o m e w i t h t h e i n c u r s i o n o f t h e w h i t e m a n . E n c o u n t e r s w i t h t h e white m a n , he implies simplistically, can o n l y h a v e neg ative consequences: " I n S o u t h A m e r i c a , w i t h few exceptions, the tribe that permits itself t o c o m e i n t o c o m p l e t e c o n t a c t w i t h the w h i t e m a n , o n t h e w h i t e m a n ' s t e r m s , h a s p e r h a p s a h a l f - c e n t u r y o f e x i s t e n c e left t o i t " {The Cloud Forest 223). F o r a c r i t i q u e o f t h i s r o m a n t i c v i e w , see t h e w o r k o f M a c C a n n e l l a n d C l i f f o r d , f o r w h o m " a u t h e n t i c i t y " is a t a l i s m a n o f white p e r c e p t i o n s o f t h e " n a t i v e o t h e r " : it is " s o m e t h i n g p r o d u c e d , n o t s a l v a g e d " ( C l i f f o r d , The Predicament of Culture 250), a n d s e r v e s t h e d o m i n a n t c u l t u r e ' s n e e d s . I t is s t r i k i n g h o w o f t e n t h e t e r m i n o l o g y n o w c o n s i d e r e d d a t e d i n a n t h r o p o l o g y is p i c k e d u p i n c o n t e m p o r a r y t r a v e l w r i t i n g a s p a r t o f its n o s t a l g i c s t o c k - i n - t r a d e . S e e h e r e t h e t r e a t m e n t o f V a r a w a ' s " u n c o m m o n a n t h r o p o l o g y " in t h e p r e v i o u s chapter; also t h e discussion o f V a n der P o s t ' s w o r k that follows i n this section. 13. T h e w o r k o f A l i B e h d a d is u s e f u l h e r e i n e l u c i d a t i n g t h e v a r i o u s s t r a t e g i e s that travel writers d e p l o y t o recuperate o r " c o n s e r v e " — a n " o t h e r " u n d e r threat o f disappearance. B e h d a d distinguishes between t h e i n f o r m a t i o n a l g u i d e b o o k , w i t h its c u r a t o r i a l r e t e n t i v e n e s s , a n d t h e t r a v e l o g u e , w h i c h e n c o u r a g e s a n i l l u s i v e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n w i t h t h e ( q u e s t i n g ) t r a v e l e r - w r i t e r (44-45). C o n t e m p o r a r y t r a v e l n a r ratives, b a l a n c e d b e t w e e n d o c u m e n t a t i o n a n d fabrication, m a y use b o t h o f these r e c u p e r a t i v e s t r a t e g i e s , a l t h o u g h — a s is t h e case w i t h M a t t h i e s s e n ' s a n d V a n d e l P o s t ' s — w h a t i n f o r m a t i o n t h e y p r o v i d e is o f t e n o v e r s h a d o w e d b y t h e t r a v e l e r ' s i n y t h o l o g i z e d quest. F o r further attempts t o clarify, a n d complicate, t h e distinc t i o n b e t w e e n t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s a n d g u i d e b o o k s , see t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n a n d t h e p o s t ' script t o t h i s b o o k . 14. T h i s is p a r t i c u l a r l y t r u e o f N e w A g e I r a v e l o g u e s , w h i c h a r e o f t e n p r o d u c e d " i n c o n j u n c t i o n " w i t h A b o r i g i n a l s h a m a n s , o r in w h i c h t h e t r a v e l e r - w r i t e r , t i d i n g its a n i n t e r m e d i a r y , " c h a n n e l s " A b o r i g i n a l w i s d o m . S e e t h e d i s c u s s i o n o f C H H I I I I N N I I I ' S a n d . e s p e c i a l l y . M o r g a n ' s w o r k l a t e r in this s e c t i o n . 1 v It is o n e o f tin; i r o n i c ; o l 1 r a v e l wiiiiii),' t h a i its f r e q u e n t appeals t o " t u n e N O
II',
i n I'M . i '
'•
1
/' 1
)v|
•; /
less n a t u r e " o r t h e " t i m e l e s s e s s e n c e s " o f n a t i v e c u l t u r e s e f f e c t i v e l y r o b t h e v e r y cultures they celebrate o f their h i s t o r y — a n d their agency f o r change. 16. F o r f u r t h e r b a c k g r o u n d o n t h e l i n k s b e t w e e n t r a v e l w r i t i n g , t o u r i s m , a n d s p i r i t u a l q u e s t , r e f e r b a c k t o c h a p t e r 2 ( t h e w o r k o f B a r r y L o p e z ) ; see a l s o c h a p t e r 5 o f L e e d ; the w o r k o f N e l s o n G r a b u r n : the essays i n B h a r d w a j , R i n s c h e d e , a n d S i e v e r s ; a n d , p a r t i c u l a r l y , G i t a M e h t a , Karma Cola: Marketing the Mystic East (1979). M e h t a ' s b o o k , a n acerbic backlash at t h e pretensions o f the "spiritual t o u r i s t , " s h o u l d b e r e q u i r e d r e a d i n g f o r t r a v e l w r i t e r s w h o see t h e i r j o u r n e y s , u n c r i t i c a l l y , as " p i l g r i m a g e s . " A m o n g t h o s e w h o s h o u l d r e a d it is R u d o l p h W u r l i t z e r , t h e s c r e e n w r i t e r f o r B e r t o l u c c i ' s The Little Buddha, w h o s e b o o k Hard Travel to Sacred Places ( 1 9 9 4 ) is v e r y m u c h grist t o M e h t a ' s m i l l . A m u c h s u b t l e r e x a m p l e , a n d t h e a c k n o w l e d g e d classic o f i t s s u b g e n r e , is P e t e r M a t t h i e s s e n ' s The Snow Leopard ( 1 9 8 7 ) . 1 7 . F o r a n i n t r o d u c t i o n t o N e w A g e c o n c e r n s , see R h o d e s ; see a l s o t h e e s s a y s in L e w i s a n d M e l t o n a n d i n H o y t a n d Y a m a m o t o . 1 8 . C a s t a n e d a ' s " D o n J u a n " t r i l o g y (The Teachings of Don Juan, 1 9 6 8 ; A Sep arate Reality, 1 9 7 1 ; Journey to Ixtlan, 1 9 7 2 ) c a n p e r h a p s o n l y b e c o n s i d e r e d p e r i p h e r a l l y as t r a v e l w r i t i n g , e v e n t h o u g h it f a m o u s l y d o c u m e n t s a v a r i e t y o f w e i r d a n d w o n d e r f u l d r u g - i n d u c e d " t r i p s . " T h e r e c o r d o f the h a l l u c i n a t o r y " t r i p , " itself a s u r r o g a t e f o r m o f travel, b e c o m e s a n o t h e r limit case f o r travel w r i t i n g ' s o n t o l o g i cal s t a t u s : a s t a t u s t h a t , as p r e v i o u s l y a r g u e d , is n o t a n d c a n n o t b e r i g o r o u s l y f i x e d . 1 9 . H a r v e y (Condition of Postmodernity, e s p . c h a p . 1) a n d F r e d r i c J a m e s o n are the best k n o w n o f a large g r o u p o f p o s t m o d e r n theorists w h o insist o n p o s t m o d e r n i s m ' s connections w i t h late-capitalist c o m m o d i t y culture. Seen in this c o n t e x t , t h e N e w A g e e m e r g e s as v e r y m u c h a p o s t m o d e r n p h e n o m e n o n : a n o t h e r s i g n o f t h e m a s s i v e r e a c h a n d s c o p e o f W e s t e r n c o m m o d i t y c u l t u r e , a n d o f its c a p a c i t y to ransack the w h o l e range o f h u m a n experience—material a n d spiritual—for c o n sumer goods. 2 0 . N e w A g e s o u l - s e a r c h i n g is a l s o a s y m p t o m o f t h e p o s t m o d e r n c u l t o f self: see h e r e D e a n M a c C a n n e l l ' s e x t r a o r d i n a r y a t t a c k o n p o s t m o d e r n i s m i n " T h e D e s i r e t o b e P o s t m o d e r n " (Empty Meeting Grounds 1 8 3 - 2 2 9 ) . " [ I ] n C a l i f o r n i a , " says M a c C a n n e l l sneeringly, " i n precisely those regions that are the m o s t m a r k e d l y p o s t m o d e r n , w e also hear a l m o s t constant chatter a b o u t 'getting i n t o u c h w i t h ' o n e ' s o w n ' t r u e , ' ' i n n e r ' f e e l i n g s , ' c e n t e r i n g ' a n d s o o n . T h e p r e d i c t a b l e r e s u l t is a n aggressive p r o m o t i o n o f the ego a n d i n d i v i d u a l i s m " (188). 2 1 . S e e , b y w a y o f c o m p a r i s o n , H e n r y S h u k m a n ' s Savage Pilgrims ( 1 9 9 6 ) . S h u k m a n , a l t h o u g h e q u a l l y w h i m s i c a l i n c a t a l o g u i n g N e w A g e e c c e n t r i c i t i e s , is less a c e r b i c t h a n M c G r a t h , a n d less r e v e a l i n g o f t h e w r i t e r ' s a n g s t .
POSTSCRIPT 1. F o r o t h e r c o m m e n t s o n T i s d a l e ' s p r o v o c a t i v e a r t i c l e , see K r o t z , 1 8 3 - 8 4 . 2. V a r i a t i o n s o n t h i s t h e m e i n c l u d e M i l l m a n , Last Places ( 1 9 9 0 ) ; M i d d l e t o n , The Last Disco in Outer Mongolia ( 1 9 9 2 ) ; W i n c h e s t e r , Outposts ( 1 9 8 5 ) ; a n d I y e r , Falling Off the Map ( 1 9 9 3 ) . 3. R o b e r t B y r o n ' s The Road to O.xiana, v o l u m e 2 i n t h e series, c a r r i e s a n i n t r o d u c t i o n b y C h a t w i n ; t h e f o u n d i n g v o l u m e is A p s l e y C h e r r y - G a r r a r d ' s The Worst Journey in the World. 4. T h e o m i s s i o n o f w o m e n ' s lexl.s l i m n I Y . i m u t t ' s s e l e c t i o n s e e m s l o b e a r o u t
T i s d a l e ' s o b s e r v a t i o n a b o u t t h e c l a s s i c t r a v e l b o o k , t h a t it is " a little b i t s a c r e d a n d m a s c u l i n e . I t despises the masses a n d loves the u n b e a t e n t r a c k , the s e l f - i m p o s e d b u t p u b l i c e x i l e " (67). S e e c h a p t e r 3 o f t h i s b o o k f o r a n e x t e n d e d d i s c u s s i o n o f m a s culine m o d e l s a n d p a r a d i g m s in travel writing. 5. T h e p h e n o m e n o n is s o w i d e s p r e a d t h a t it s e e m s p o i n t l e s s t o p r o v i d e specific e x a m p l e s . 6. T h e p r a c t i c e a m o n g l e a d i n g w r i t e r s o f i n t r o d u c i n g t h e i r c o l l e a g u e s o r f r i e n d s , a n d t h e n s t a g i n g e n c o u n t e r s w i t h t h e m i n t h e i r t r a v e l o g u e s , is s u r e l y a n elaboration o f the courtesies o f the b l u r b . 7. L o n e l y P l a n e t is a p p a r e n t l y e x p a n d i n g i n a l l d i r e c t i o n s . A n o t h e r n e w s p a per article observes, " T h e y ' r e o n the Internet, o f course, a n d n o w o n o u r television screens.. .. Y o u can't h e l p b u t like [the presenter] I a n W r i g h t . H e ' s a great L o n e l y P l a n e t m a n . T r y a n y t h i n g o n c e . A n d p e r f e c t f o r A l a s k a w h i c h , as W r i g h t t o l d u s . is a w i l d p l a c e . F u l l o f m o o s e , t h e c a u s e o f s o m e r a t h e r m a n u f a c t u r e d a n x i e t y f o r W r i g h t " (New Zealand Herald, F e b r u a r y 19, 1997, B i o ) . E v e n t h e n e w s p a p e r p l u g a s s u m e s t h e flippant L o n e l y P l a n e t t o n e . 8. T h e c h a p t e r o n A f r i c a m a k e s c o n s i d e r a b l e u s e o f J o s e p h C o n r a d a n d G r a h a m G r e e n e , t h o u g h n o t , s u r p r i s i n g l y , o f V . S . N a i p a u l . H o w e v e r , it c l e a r l y " r e a d s " A f r i c a f r o m w i t h i n t h e C o n r a d - N a i p a u l t r a d i t i o n (see N i x o n , London Calling; a l s o c h a p . 2 o f t h i s b o o k ) . 9. K a p l a n p r o t e s t s t h a t " m i n e w o u l d b e a n u n s e n t i m e n t a l j o u r n e y [ u n l i k e that o f L a u r e n c e Sterne]. M y impressions m i g h t be the ' w r o n g ' ones t o have, b u t t h e y w o u l d b e b a s e d o n w h a t I s a w " (11); l a t e r , h e asserts t h a t h e is " a t i m e t r a v e l e r , but n o t necessarily a r o m a n t i c o n e . . . . I chart places w h e r e a literary tourist w o u l d r a r e l y g o " (131). The Ends of the Earth, n o n e t h e l e s s , is s a t u r a t e d w i t h l i t e r a r y r e f e r ences; despite his a t t e m p t s t o p r o v i d e alibis, K a p l a n u l t i m a t e l y invites r e c o g n i t i o n as s e n t i m e n t a l t r a v e l e r , l i t e r a r y t o u r i s t , a n d a d v e n t u r e r — p r e c i s e l y t h e m o d e l s o f the traveler h e wishes t o disclaim. 10. F o r a r e c e n t , c o r u s c a t i n g c r i t i q u e o f K a p l a n ' s w o r k , w h i c h sees its " p r o g n o s e ^ o f d i s i n t e g r a t i o n " as p o s s i b l y " t e s t i n g c o n s e r v a t i v e w a t e r s f o r t h e d e p t h s o f a r e e m e r g e n t p o s i t i v i s t r a c i s m , " see B r e n n a n , At Home in the World, 125-27. A s B r e n n a n a r g u e s , K a p l a n ' s " r h e t o r i c o f f e a r a n d l o a t h i n g " is " e n t i r e l y a t o d d s w i t h m a i n s t r e a m h u m a n i t i e s d i s c o u r s e " (126). B u t as w i l l b e c l e a r f r o m t h i s b o o k , it is n o t a t o d d s w i t h a c e r t a i n s t r a n d o f " p o l i t i c a l " t r a v e l w r i t i n g , w h i c h uses t h e g e n r e to j u s t i f y — a l t h o u g h also, i n s o m e cases, t o i r o n i z e — x e n o p h o b i c s e n t i m e n t s a n d cultural m y t h s . Sophisticated e x a m p l e s o f this f o r m o f political travelogue are the " A f r i c a n " a n d " I n d i a n " w o r k s o f V . S . N a i p a u l (see c h a p s . 1 a n d 2). 11. T w o o t h e r r e c e n t n a r r a t i v e s s u c c e s s f u l l y n e g o t i a t i n g b e t w e e n i n d i v i d u a l travel experience a n d the stuff o f history, in layered a n d n u a n c e d fashion, are N e i l A s c h e r s o n ' s Black Sea (1996; see c h a p . 4, n o t e 4 a b o v e ) , a n d D o r o t h y C a r r i n g t o n ' s The Dream-Hunters of Corsica (1995).
N O ' I I I N
T O
t'Aiil'.N a e > 6 -
I
)
W O R K S
C I T E D
A c k e r l e y , J . R . Hindoo Holiday: An Indian Journal 1932. N e w D e l h i : A r n o l d H e i n e m a n n , 1979. A c k e r m a n , D i a n e . The Rarest of the Rare: Vanishing Animals, Timeless Worlds. N e w Y o r k : R a n d o m H o u s e , 1995. A d a m s , J a m e s E l i . Dandies and Desert Saints: Styles of Victorian Masculinity. I t h a c a , N . Y . : C o r n e l l U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1995. A d a m s , P e r c y . Travelers and Travel Liars, 1660-1800. B e r k e l e y a n d L o s A n g e l e s : U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a P r e s s , 1962. A h m a d , A i j a z . " P o s t c o l o n i a l i s m : W h a t ' s i n a N a m e ? " Late Imperial Culture, e d . R o m a n d e la C a m p a , E . A n n K a p l a n , a n d M i c h a e l Sprinker. N e w Y o r k : V e r s o , 1995. 11-32. A l e x a n d e r , B r i a n . Green Cathedrals: A Wayward Traveler in the Rain Forest. N e w Y o r k : L y o n s a n d B u r f o r d , 1995. A l l e n , J o h n L . " L a n d s o f M y t h , W a t e r s o f W o n d e r : T h e Place o f the I m a g i n a t i o n i n t h e H i s t o r y o f G e o g r a p h i c a l E x p l o r a t i o n . " Geographies of the Mind, e d . D a v i d L o w e n t h a l a n d M a r t y n B o w d e n . N e w Y o r k : O x f o r d University Press, 1976. 41-61. A m i r t h a n a y a g a m , G u y , e d . Writers in East- West Encounter: New Cultural Bear ings. L o n d o n : M a c m i l l a n , 1981. m i s , M a r t i n . The Moronic Inferno and Other Visits to America. L o n d o n : J o n a t h a n C a p e , 1986. ppadurai, A r j u n . "Disjuncture a n d Difference in the G l o b a l Cultural E c o n o m y . " Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader, e d . P a t r i c k W i l l i a m s ! a n d L a u r a C h r i s m a n . N e w Y o r k : C o l u m b i a U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1994. 324-39. . Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: U n i v e r s i t y o f M i n n e s o t a P r e s s , 1996. A p p i a h , K w a r r i e A n t h o n y . In My Father's House: Africa in the Philosophy of Cul ture. N e w Y o r k : O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1992. A r a c , J o n a t h a n , a n d H a r r i e t R i t v o , e d s . The Macropolitics of Nineteenth-Century Literature: Nationalism, Exoticism, Imperialism. P h i l a d e l p h i a : U n i v e r s i t y o f P e n n s y l v a n i a P r e s s , 1991. A s c h e r s o n , N e i l . Black Sea: The Birthplace of Civilisation and Barbarism. L o n d o n : V i n t a g e , 1996. Itnndy, J o e . " M a n a g i n g the O t h e r o f N a t u r e : Sustainability, Spectacle, a n d G l o b a l R e g i m e s o f C a p i t a l in l l i c o t o u r i s m . " Public Culture 8 (1996): 539-66. B u r r , P a t r i c i a . The Memsitliibs: The Women of Victorian India. L o n d o n : S e e k e r a n d W a r b u r g , 1976.
[
B a r t h e s , R o l a n d . Empire of Signs. 1 9 7 0 . T r a n s . R i c h a r d H o w a r d . N e w Y o r k : N o o n d a y Press, 1989. . The Grain of the Voice: Interviews, 1962-1980. 1 9 8 1 . T r a n s . L i n d a C o v e r d a l e . N e w Y o r k : H i l l a n d W a n g , 1985. . Mythologies. 1 9 5 7 . T r a n s . A n n e t t e L a v e r s . L o n d o n : J o n a t h a n C a p e , 1 9 7 2 . . The Pleasure of the Text. T r a n s . R i c h a r d M i l l e r . N e w Y o r k : N o o n d a y Press, 1990. B a u d r i l l a r d , J e a n . America. 1 9 8 6 . T r a n s . C h r i s T u r n e r . N e w Y o r k : V e r s o , 1 9 8 8 . B e h d a d , A l i . Belated Travelers: Orientalism in the Age of Colonial Dissolution. D u r h a m , N . C . : D u k e U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1994. B e l l , G a v i n . In Search of Tusitala: Travels in the Pacific after Robert Louis Steven son. L o n d o n : P i c a d o r , 1 9 9 4 . B e n n e t t , C a t h e r i n e . " W h y t h e R i g h t P e o p l e C h o o s e t o S t a y a t H o m e . " Guardian Weekly, J u n e 2 3 , 1 9 9 6 , 3 0 . B h a b h a , H o m i . " T h e O t h e r Q u e s t i o n : Difference, D i s c r i m i n a t i o n , a n d the D i s c o u r s e o f C o l o n i a l i s m . " Literature, Politics and Theory: Papers from the Essex Conference, e d . F r a n c i s B a r k e r c t al. L o n d o n : M e t h u e n , 1 9 8 6 . 1 4 8 - 7 2 . , e d . Nation and Narration. L o n d o n : R o u t l e d g e , 1 9 9 1 . B h a r d w a j , S . M . , G . R i n s c h e d e , a n d A . S i e v e r s , e d s . Pilgrimage in the Old and New World. B e r l i n : D i e t r i c h R i e m e r V e r l a g , 1 9 9 4 . B i d d l e c o m b e , P e t e r . Travels with My Briefcase: Around the World, on Expenses. B o s t o n : L i t t l e , B r o w n , 1994. B i r k e t t , D e a . Serpent in Paradise. L o n d o n : P i c a d o r , 1 9 9 7 . B i r k e t t , D e a , a n d S a r a W h e e l e r , e d s . Amazonian: The Penguin Book of Women's Travel Writing. L o n d o n : P e n g u i n , 1 9 9 8 . B o n g i e , C h r i s t o p h e r . Exotic Memories: Literature, Colonialism, and the Fin de Siecle. S t a n f o r d , C a l i f . : S t a n f o r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 9 1 . Bourke, Chris. " H a v e Imagination, Will Travel. Jonathan R a b a n : T h e Studious E n g l i s h m a n A b r o a d . " New Zealand Listener, A p r i l 1 2 - 1 8 , 1 9 9 7 , 4 6 - 4 7 . B o w l e s , P a u l . The Sheltering Sky. N e w Y o r k : N e w D i r e c t i o n s , 1 9 4 9 . . Up above the World. N e w Y o r k : S i m o n a n d S c h u s t e r , 1 9 6 6 . B r e n n a n , T i m o t h y . At Home in the World: Cosmopolitanism Now. C a m b r i d g e , M a s s . : H a r v a r d University Press, 1997. . Salman Rushdie and the Third World: Myths of the Nation. N e w Y o r k : S t . M a r t i n ' s Press, 1989. B r o d y , H u g h . The People's Land: Inuit, Whites, and the Eastern Arctic. V a n c o u v e r : D o u g l a s and M c l n t y r e , 1991. B r o o k , S t e p h e n . Hanky Tonk Gelato: Travels through Texas. L o n d o n : H a m i l t o n , 1985. B r y s o n , B i l l . Neither Here Nor There: Travels in Europe. L o n d o n : S e e k e r a n d W a r burg, 1991. . Notes from a Small Island. N e w Y o r k : D o u b l e d a y , 1 9 9 6 . B u c k - M o r s s , S u s a n . " S e m i o t i c B o u n d a r i e s a n d the Politics o f M e a n i n g : M o d e r n i t y o n T o u r — a V i l l a g e i n T r a n s i t i o n . " New Ways of Knowing: The Sciences, Society, and Reconstructive Knowledge, e d . M . R a s k i n a n d I I . B e r n s t e i n . T o t o w a , N . J . : R o w m a n a n d Liltlelield, 1987. 200 236. B u h a s z , L a s z l o . " A n I n t r o s p e c t i v e S o u t h Piicilie V o y a g e . " Toronto Globe ami Mail, J u n e r / , 1 9 9 : ! , n . p .
.'.t\2
W U H K N
nil'11
B u r r o u g h s , W i l l i a m . Naked Lunch. N e w Y o r k : G r o v e , 1 9 5 9 . B u r u m a , I a n . Behind the Mask: On Sexual Demons, Sacred Mothers, Transvestites, Gangsters, and Other Japanese Cultural Heroes. N e w Y o r k : P a n t h e o n , 1 9 8 4 . B u s i , A l d o . Sodomies in Elevenpoint. T r a n s . S t u a r t H o o d . B o s t o n : F a b e r a n d F a b e r , 1992. B u t l e r , J u d i t h . Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. N e w Y o r k : R o u t l e d g e , 1990. B u t o r , M i c h e l . " T r a v e l a n d W r i t i n g . ' ' Mosaic 8, n o . 1 ( f a l l 1 9 7 4 ) : 1 - 1 6 . B u t t i m e r , A n n e . " G r a s p i n g t h e D y n a m i s m o f t h e L i f e w o r l d . " Annals of the Asso ciation of American Geographers 6 6 , n o . 2 ( 1 9 7 6 ) : 2 7 7 - 9 2 . B u t t i m e r , A n n e , a n d D a v i d S e a m o n , e d s . The Human Experience of Space and Place. L o n d o n : C r o o m H e l m , 1 9 8 0 . B u z a r d , J a m e s . The Beaten Track: European Tourism, Literature, and the Ways to "Culture," i8oo-rg/8. O x f o r d : C l a r e n d o n P r e s s , 1 9 9 3 . B y r o n , R o b e r t . The Road to Oxiana. 1 9 3 7 . L o n d o n : P i c a d o r T r a v e l C l a s s i c s , 1 9 9 4 . C a h i l l , T i m . Jaguars Ripped My Flesh. N e w Y o r k : V i n t a g e , 1 9 9 6 . . A Wolverine Is Eating My Leg. L o n d o n : F o u r t h E s t a t e , 1 9 9 4 . C a l l e n b a c h , E r n e s t . Ecotopia: The Notebooks and Reports of William Weston. Berkeley, Calif.: B a n y a n Tree B o o k s , 1975. C a l v i n o , I t a l o . Invisible Cities. 1 9 7 2 . T r a n s . W i l l i a m W e a v e r . L o n d o n : H a r c o u r t Brace Jovanovich, 1974. C a m p b e l l , A l a n . Getting to Know Waiwai: An Amazonian Ethnography. N e w Y o r k : R o u t l e d g e , 1995. C a m p b e l l , M a r y . The Witness and the Other World: Exotic European Travel Writ ing, 400 1600. I t h a c a , N . Y . : C o r n e l l U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 8 8 . C a p o n i , G e n a . Conversations with Paul Bowles. J a c k s o n : U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s o f M i s sissippi, 1993. C a r p e n t e r , H u m p h r e y . W. H. Auden: A Biography. L o n d o n : A l l e n a n d U n w i n , 1981. C a r r i n g t o n , D o r o t h y . The Dream-Hunters of Corsica. L o n d o n : W e i d e n f e l d a n d N i c o l s o n , 1995. C a r t e r , P a u l . Living in a New Country: History, Travelling and Language. L o n d o n : F a b e r a n d F a b e r , 1992. C a s t a n e d a , C a r l o s . Journey to Ixtlan: The Lessons of Don Juan. N e w Y o r k : S i m o n and Schuster, 1972. . A Separate Rehlity: Further Conversations with Don Juan. N e w Y o r k : S i m o n a n d Schuster, 1971. . The Teachings of Don Juan: A Yaqui Way of Knowledge. N e w Y o r k : B a l l a n t i n e B o o k s , 1968. C a s t r o n o v o , D a v i d . The English Gentleman: Images and Ideals in Literature and Society. N e w Y o r k : U n g a r , 1 9 8 7 . C a u l f i e l d , A n n i e . Kingdom of the Film Stars. M e l b o u r n e : L o n e l y P l a n e t , 1 9 9 7 . d e C e r t e a u , M i c h e l . Heterologies: Discourse on the Other. T r a n s . B r i a n M a s s u m i . M i n n e a p o l i s : U n i v e r s i t y o f M i n n e s o t a Press, 1986. Chagnon, N a p o l e o n . Yanomamo, the Fierce People. N e w Y o r k : H o l t , R i n e h a r t arid W i r i s l o n , 1 9 6 8 . C h i i r u i r d i , D r i s s lien H u m e r i . // Life Full of Holes. 1964. T r a n s . P a u l B o w l e s . N e w Y o r k : G r o v e P I ' I : S H , 198:1,
WUWKN U T H I )
'i4
I
C h a m b e r s , I a i n . Migrancy, Culture, Identity. L o n d o n : R o u t l e d g e , 1 9 9 4 . C h a t w i n , B r u c e . Anatomy of Restlessness. E d . J . B o r m a n d M . G r a v e s . L o n d o n : J o n a t h a n C a p e , 1996. . In Patagonia. L o n d o n : J o n a t h a n C a p e , 1 9 7 7 . . On the Black Hill. L o n d o n : J o n a t h a n C a p e , 1 9 8 2 . . The Songlines. N e w Y o r k : V i k i n g , 1 9 8 7 . . Utz. L o n d o n : P a n . 1 9 8 8 . . The Viceroy of Ouidah. N e w Y o r k : S u m m i t B o o k s , 1 9 8 0 . . What Am I Doing Here. L o n d o n : J o n a t h a n C a p e , 1 9 8 9 . C h a t w i n , B r u c e , a n d P a u l T h e r o u x . Patagonia Revisited. B o s t o n : H o u g h t o n M i f f l i n , 1986. C h e r r y - G a r r a r d , A p s l e y . The Worst Journey in the World. L o n d o n : C o n s t a b l e , 1922. C h o u k r i . M o h a m e d . For Bread Alone. T r a n s . P a u l B o w l e s . L o n d o n : P . O w e n , 1973. Jean Genet in Tangier. T r a n s . P a u l B o w l e s . N e w Y o r k : E c c o P r e s s , 1 9 7 4 . . Love with a Few Hairs. T r a n s . P a u l B o w l e s . L o n d o n : O w e n , 1 9 6 7 . . Tennessee Williams in Tangier. T r a n s . P a u l B o w l e s . S a n t a B a r b a r a , C a l i f . : C a d m u s Editions, 1979. C l i f f o r d , J a m e s . " O n E t h n o g r a p h i c A l l e g o r y . " Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, e d . J a m e s C l i f f o r d a n d G e o r g e M a r c u s . B e r k e l e y a n d L o s A n g e l e s : U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a Press, 1986. 9 8 - 1 2 1 . . The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. C a m b r i d g e , M a s s . : H a r v a r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 8 8 . . Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. C a m b r i d g e , M a s s . : H a r v a r d U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1997. . " T r a v e l i n g C u l t u r e s . " Cultural Studies, e d . L a w r e n c e G r o s s b e r g , C a r y N e l s o n , a n d P a u l a Treichler. N e w Y o r k : R o u t l e d g e , 1992. 96-116. C l i f f o r d , J a m e s , a n d V i v c k D h a r e s h w a r , e d s . Inscriptions 5 ( 1 9 8 9 ) , s p e c i a l i s s u e o n travel. C l i f f o r d , J a m e s , a n d G e o r g e M a r c u s , e d s . Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. B e r k e l e y a n d L o s A n g e l e s : U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a P r e s s , 1986. C o c k e r , M a r k . Loneliness and Time: British Travel Writing in the Twentieth Cen tury. L o n d o n : S e e k e r a n d W a r b u r g , 1 9 9 2 . C o h n , N o r m a n . Cosmos, Chaos, and the World to Come. N e w H a v e n , C o n n . : Y a l e U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1993. C o n r a d , J o s e p h . Heart of Darkness. 1 8 9 8 . L o n d o n : P e n g u i n , 1 9 8 5 . . Lord Jim. 1 9 0 0 . O x f o r d : O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 8 3 . C o n d o n , S e a n . Sean and David's Long Drive. M e l b o u r n e : L o n e l y P l a n e t , 1 9 9 6 . C o n o v e r , T e d . " T r u c k i n g t h r o u g h t h e A I D S B e l t . " The New Yorker, A u g u s ! i(S, 1993, n.p. C o r t a z z i , H u g h . The Japanese Achievement. N e w Y o r k : S t . M a r t i n ' s Press, 1990. C o w a s j e e , S a r o s . I n t r o d u c t i o n t o Hindoo Holiday: An Indian Journal, by J . R . A c k e r l e y . 1952. N e w D e l h i : A r n o l d - H e i n e m a n n , 1979. C u l l e r , J o n a t h a n . " T h e S e m i o t i c s o f T o u r i s m . " Framing the Sign: ('riticism mid Its Institutions. N o r m a n : U n i v e r s i t y o l ' O k l a l i o m u I'ross, 1988. w \ 6 7 . Dante A l i g h i e r i . The Divine Comedy. T r i m s , A l l e n M i u u k l b m i m L o n d o n : D a v i d <"anipbcll. ion";.
WOMKN (.Trni
D a v i d s o n , B a s i l . The Black Man's Burden: Africa and the Curse of the NationState. N e w Y o r k : T i m e s B o o k s , 1992. D a v i d s o n , R o b y n . Desert Places. N e w Y o r k : V i k i n g , 1996. . Tracks. N e w Y o r k : P a n t h e o n , 1980. . " W a l k o n t h e W i l d S i d e . " Guardian Weekly, A u g u s t 4,1996, n . p . d e l a C a m p a , R o m a n , A n n K a p l a n , a n d M i c h a e l S p r i n k e r , e d s . Late Imperial Cul ture. L o n d o n : V e r s o , 1995. d e L a u r e t i s , T e r e s a , e d . Feminist Studies, Critical Studies. B l o o m i n g t o n : I n d i a n a U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1986. Deleuze, Gilles, a n d Felix G u a t t a r i . "Treatise o n N o m a d o l o g y — t h e W a r M a c h i n e . " A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. W i l l i a m W e a v e r . M i n n e a p o l i s : U n i v e r s i t y o f M i n n e s o t a P r e s s , 1987. D e s c o l a , P h i l i p p e . The Spears of Twilight: Life and Death in the Amazon Jungle. L o n d o n : H a r p e r C o l l i n s , 1996. D e s s a i x , R o b e r t . Night Letters. S y d n e y : M a c m i l l a n , 1996. d e T e r a n , L i s a S t . A u b i n , e d . Indiscreet Journeys: Stories of Women on the Road. B o s t o n : F a b e r a n d F a b e r , 1990. D i s k i , J e n n y . Skating to Antarctica. L o n d o n : G r a n t a B o o k s , 1997. D u r i n g , S i m o n . " P o s t c o l o n i a l i s m a n d G l o b a l i z a t i o n . " Meanjin 48, n o . 2 (1992): 339-53I ' I b e r h a r d t , I s a b e l l e . The Passionate Nomad: The Diary of Isahelle Eberhardt. T r a n s . N i n a d e V o o g d . E d . R a n a K a b b a n i . L o n d o n : V i r a g o , 1987. E c o , U m b e r t o . Travels in Hyperreality. T r a n s . W i l l i a m W e a v e r . S a n D i e g o : H a r c o u r t B r a c e J o v a n o v i c h , 1986. E i g h n e r , L a r s . Travels with Lizbeth. N e w Y o r k : F a w c e t t C o l u m b i n e , 1993. E m b e r l e y , J u l i a . Thresholds of Difference: Feminist Critique, Native Women's Writ ing, Postcolonial Theory. T o r o n t o : U n i v e r s i t y o f T o r o n t o P r e s s , 1993. E m p s o n , W i l l i a m . Some Versions of Pastoral. 1935. L o n d o n : H o g a r t h , 1986. E v a n s , J u l i a n . Transit of Venus: Travels in the Pacific. L o n d o n : S e e k e r a n d W a r b u r g , 1992. F e i f e r , M a x i n e . Going Places: The Ways of the Tourist from Imperial Rome to the Present Day. L o n d o n : M a c m i l l a n , 1985. F e r m o r , P a t r i c k L e i g h . A Time of Gifts. L o n d o n : J o h n M u r r a y , 1977. F l e m i n g , P e t e r . Brazilian Adventure. 1933. L o n d o n : P e n g u i n , 1957. F o l e y , B a r b a r a . Telling the ffruth: The Theory and Practice of Documentary Fic tion. I t h a c a , N . Y . : C o r n e l l U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1986. F o r s t e r , E . M . Maurice. L o n d o n : E . A r n o l d , 1971. -. A Passage to India. 1924. L o n d o n : E . A r n o l d , 1978. I o u c a u l t , M i c h e l . " N i e t z s c h e , G e n e a l o g y , H i s t o r y . " The Foucaull Reader, t r a n s . D . F . B o u c h a r d a n d Sherry S i m o n , ed. Paul R a b i n o w . N e w Y o r k : P a n t h e o n , 1984. E r a s e r , K e a l h , e d . Bad Trips. N e w Y o r k : V i n t a g e , 1991. F r e e m a n , D e r e k . Margaret Mead and Samoa: The Making and Unmaking of an Anthropological Myth. C a m b r i d g e , M a s s . : H a r v a r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1983. i'row. J o h n . " T o u r i s m
a n d the Semiotics
o f Nostalgia."
October ( f a l l 1990):
127 54i ' u k u y m i i i i . F r a n c i s . The Lnd of History and the Last Man. N e w Y o r k : F r e e P r e s s , 1 <>>>••
W O U K hi ( ' 1 1 1 ' » 1 , ^
F u r b a n k , P h i l i p N . E. M. Forster: A Life. 2 v o l s . L o n d o n : S e e k e r a n d W a r b u r g , 1977-78. F u s s e l l , P a u l . Abroad: British Literary Traveling between the Wars. O x f o r d : O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1980. G a r b e r , M a r j o r i e . Vested Interests: Cross-Dressing and Cultural Anxiety. N e w Y o r k : R o u t l e d g e , 1992. G h o s h , A m i t a v . In an Antique Land: History in the Guise of a Traveler's Tale. N e w Y o r k : V i n t a g e , 1992. G i d e , A n d r e . Travels in the Congo. 1927. T r a n s . D o r o t h y B a s s y . H a r m o n d s w o r t h : P e n g u i n , 1986. Glaser, E l t o n . " T h e Self-Reflexive Traveler: Paul T h e r o u x o n the A r t o f Travel W r i t i n g . " Centennial Review 33 ( s u m m e r 1989): 193-206. . " P a u l T h e r o u x a n d t h e P o e t r y o f D e p a r t u r e s . " Temperamental Journeys: Essays on the Modern Literature of Travel, e d . M i c h a e l K o w a l e w s k i . A t h e n s : U n i v e r s i t y o f G e o r g i a P r e s s , 1992. 153-63. G o l d i e , T e r r y . Fear and Temptation: The Image of the Indigene in Canadian, Aus tralian, and New Zealand Literatures. M o n t r e a l : M c G i l l - Q u e e n ' s U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1989. G o v i e r , K a t h e r i n e , e d . Without a Guide: Contemporary Women's Travel Adven tures. N e w Y o r k : H u n g r y M i n d , 1996. G r a b u r n , N e l s o n . " T o u r i s m : T h e S a c r e d J o u r n e y . " Hosts and Guests: The Anthro pology of Tourism, e d . V a l e n e S m i t h . P h i l a d e l p h i a : U n i v e r s i t y o f P e n n s y l v a n i a P r e s s , 1977. 21-36. G r e e n , M a r t i n . Dreams of Adventure, Deeds of Empire. N e w Y o r k : B a s i c B o o k s , 1979. G r e e n , M i c h e l l e . The Dream at the End of the World: Paul Bowles and the Rene gades of Tangier. N e w Y o r k : H a r p e r C o l l i n s , 1991. G r e e n b l a t t , S t e p h e n . Marvelous Possessions: The Wonder of the New World. C h i c a g o : U n i v e r s i t y o f C h i c a g o P r e s s , 1991. G r e g o r y , D e r e k . Geographical Imaginations. O x f o r d : B l a c k w e l l , 1994. G r e w a l , I n d e r p a l . Home and Harem: Nation, Gender, Empire, and the Cultures of Travel. D u r h a m , N . C . : D u k e U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1996. G r o s s b e r g , L a w r e n c e , C a r y N e l s o n , a n d P a u l a T r e i c h l e r , e d s . Cultural Studies. N e w Y o r k : R o u t l e d g e , 1992. G u h a , R a n a j i t , a n d G a y a t r i S p i v a k , e d s . Selected Subaltern Studies. N e w Y o r k : O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y Press, T 9 8 8 . H a r v e y , D a v i d . The Condition of Postmodernity. O x f o r d : B l a c k w e l l , 1989. H a w t h o r n e , Susan. " T h e Politics o f the E x o t i c : T h e P a r a d o x o f C u l t u r a l V o y e u r i s m . " Meanjin 48, n o . 2 (1989): 259-68. H e a m , L a f c a d i o . Writings from Japan. E d . F r a n c i s K i n g . L o n d o n : P e n g u i n , 1984. H e r d t , G i l b e r t . Ritualized Homosexuality in Melanesia. B e r k e l e y a n d L o s A n g e l e s : U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a P r e s s , 1984. H i g g i n s , T o m . Spotted Dick, S'il Vous Plait: An English Restaurant in France. N e w Y o r k : S o h o P r e s s , 1995. Hobson, S a r a h . Through Persia in Disguise. L o n d o n : J . M u r r a y - 1 9 7 3 . H o l l a n d , Patrick. " J a n Morris: (Post)imperial Nostalgia a n d Possession." U n p u b lished essay, 1994. I l o l l i u g h u r s l , , A l a n . The Fohl'mg Star. I .outIon: ( h u l l o a n d W i m l u s , 1 9 9 4 . h o o k s , bell, "RoproKonliiin W l i i i o n t w s in llir lll.ick liimj.-,miiiion " < "nltunil Stud-
ies, e d . L a w r e n c e G r o s s b e r g , C a r y N e l s o n , a n d P a u l a T r e i c h l e r . N e w Y o r k : R o u t l e d g e , 1 9 9 2 . 338-46. H o r w e l l , V e r o n i c a . " S e n s i b i l i t y o n a G r a n d T o u r . " Guardian Weekly, J u l y 1 4 , 1 9 9 6 , 28. H o y t , K a r e n , a n d J . Y a m a m o t o , e d s . The New Age Rage. O l d D o m i n i o n , N . J . : P o w e r B o o k s , 1987. H u g g a n , G r a h a m . " M a p s , D r e a m s , a n d the Presentation o fEthnographic N a r r a t i v e . " Ariel 2 2 , n o . 1 ( 1 9 9 1 ) : 5 7 - 6 9 . . " T h e P o s t c o l o n i a l E x o t i c : R u s h d i e ' s ' B o o k e r o f B o o k e r s . ' " Transition 6 4 (1994): 22-29. . " S o m e Recent Australian Fictions in the A g e o f T o u r i s m : M u r r a y Bail, I n e z B a r a n a y , G e r a r d L e e . " Australian Literary Studies 1 6 , n o . 2 ( 1 9 9 3 ) : 168-78. . " A Tale o fT w o Parrots: Walcott. R h y s , a n dthe Uses o f Colonial M i m i c r y . " Contemporary Literature 3 5 , n o . 4 ( 1 9 9 4 ) : 6 4 3 - 6 0 . H y l a n d , P a u l . The Black Heart: A Voyage into Central Africa. N e w Y o r k : P a r a g o n H o u s e , 1988. I g n a t i e f f , M i c h a e l . " A n I n t e r v i e w w i t h B r u c e C h a t w i n . " Granta 21 ( s p r i n g 1 9 8 7 ) : 23-37I r v i n e , L u c y . Castaway. L o n d o n : V i c t o r G o l l a n c z , 1 9 8 3 . I s h e r w o o d , C h r i s t o p h e r . Goodbye to Berlin. 1 9 3 9 . L o n d o n : T r i a d P a n t h e r , 1 9 7 7 . I y e r , P i c o . Falling Off the Map: Some Lonely Places of the World. T o r o n t o : K n o p f C a n a d a , 1993. . The Lady and the Monk: Four Seasons in Kyoto. N e w Y o r k : K n o p f , 1 9 9 1 . . Video Night in Kathmandu, and Other Reports from the Not-So-Far East. 1988. N e w Y o r k : V i n t a g e , 1989. J a g o s e , A n n a m a r i e . Queer Theory. C a r l t o n , V i c t o r i a : M e l b o u r n e U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1996. J a m e s o n , F r e d r i c . " P o s t m o d e r n i s m a n d C o n s u m e r S o c i e t y . " The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture, e d . H a l F o s t e r . S e a t t l e : B a y P r e s s , 1 9 8 3 . 1 1 1 - 2 5 . . Postmodernism.: or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. D u r h a m , N . C . : D u k e U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1991. K a n e , J o e . Running the Amazon. L o n d o n : B o d l e y H e a d , 1 9 8 9 . . Savages. V a n c o u v e r : D o u g l a s a n d M c l n t y r e , 1 9 9 5 . K a p l a n , C a r e n . " M i c h a e l A d e n ' s Fictions o f Exile: T h e Subject o f E t h n i c A u t o b i o g r a p h y . " AutolBiograpl\> 4 , n o . 2 ( 1 9 8 8 ) : 1 4 0 - 4 9 . . Questions of Travel: Postmodern Discourses of Displacement. Durham, N . C . : D u k e U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1996. K a p l a n , R o b e r t D . Balkan Ghosts: A .Journey through History. N e w Y o r k : S t . M a r t i n ' s Press, 1993. . " T h e C o m i n g A n a r c h y : H o w Scarcity, C r i m e , O v e r p o p u l a t i o n , Tribalism, a n d Disease A r e R a p i d l y D e s t r o y i n g t h e Social F a b r i c o f O u r Planet." Atlantic Monthly, F e b r u a r y 1 9 9 4 , 4 4 - 7 6 . . The Ends of the Earth: A Journey at the Dawn of the 20th Century. N e w Y o r k : R a n d o m H o u s e , 1996. K e e s i n g , R o g e r M . " E x o t i c R e a d i n g s o f C u l t u r a l T e x t s . " Current Anthropology 3 0 , n o . 4(1989): 459-79. K i n u a i d , J a m a ion. A Small Place, N e w Y o r k : N e w A m e r i c a n L i b r a r y , 1 9 8 8 . K i n g l i t k o , A l w n i x l e i ' , HotIich 1844. l i v a n s l o n , III.: M a r l b o r o P r e s s , 1 9 9 6 . WOMKS 1 I'l'IU)
.'.| /
K n i g h t , A l a n n a . Robert Louis Stevenson in the South Seas. N e w Y o r k : P a r a g o n H o u s e , 1987. K o r n , E r i c . " S h e l f - T r a v e l l i n g . " Times Literary Supplement, J u l y 2 6 , 1 9 9 6 , 36. K o w a l e w s k i , M i c h a e l , e d . Temperamental Journeys: Essays on the Modern Litera ture of Travel. A t h e n s : U n i v e r s i t y o f G e o r g i a P r e s s , 1 9 9 1 . K r a k a u e r , J o n . Into Thin Air: A Personal Account of the Mount Everest Disaster. N e w Y o r k : Villard, 1997. K r o l l e r , E v a M a r i e . " F i r s t Impressions: R h e t o r i c a l Strategies i n T r a v e l W r i t i n g b y V i c t o r i a n W o m e n . " Ariel 2 1 , n o . 4 ( 1 9 9 0 ) : 8 7 - 9 9 . K r o t z , L a r r y . Tourists: How Our Fastest Growing Industry Is Changing the World. L o n d o n : F a b e r a n d F a b e r , 1996. L a m p e d u s a , G i u s e p p e . The Leopard. 1 9 5 7 . T r a n s . A r c h i b a l d C o l q u h o u n . N e w Y o r k : K n o p f , 1991. L a w r e n c e , K a r e n . Penelope Voyages: Women and Travel in the British Literary Tradition. I t h a c a , N . Y . : C o r n e l l U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 9 4 . L e e d , E r i c . The Mind of the Traveler: From Gilgamesh to Global Tourism. N e w Y o r k : Basic B o o k s , 1991. Leer, M a r t i n . " F r o m L i n e a r t o Areal: Suggestions t o w a r d a C o m p a r a t i v e Literary G e o g r a p h y o f C a n a d a a n d A u s t r a l i a . " Kunapipi 1 2 , n o . 3 ( 1 9 9 0 ) : 7 5 - 8 5 . L e h m a n , J e a n - P i e r r e . " I m a g e s o f t h e O r i e n t . " Madam Butterfly: Opera Guide No. 26. L o n d o n : J o h n C a l d e r , 1 9 8 4 . L e v i - S t r a u s s , C l a u d e . Tristes Tropiques. T r a n s . J o h n a n d D o r e e n W e i g h t m a n . N e w Y o r k : A t h e n e u m , 1984. L e w i s , J a m e s R . , a n d G o r d o n M e l t o n , e d s . Perspectives on the New Age. A l b a n y : State U n i v e r s i t y o f N e w Y o r k Press, 1992. L i o n n e t , F r a n c o i s e . Postcolonial Representations: Women, Literature, Identity. I t h a c a , N . Y . : C o r n e l l U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1996. L o p e z , B a r r y . Arctic Dreams: Imagination and Desire in a Northern Landscape. L o n d o n : P a n , 1986. L o t i , P i e r r e . Madame Chrysanthemum. E n s o r . L o n d o n : K P I , 1985.
Intro. Kaori
O'Connor. Trans.
Laura
L o w e , L i s a . Critical Terrains: French and British Orientalisms. I t h a c a , N . Y . : C o r nell U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1991. L o w e n t h a l , D a v i d , a n d M a r t y n B o w d e n , e d s . Geographies of the Mind: Essays in Historical Geosophy. N e w Y o r k : O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 7 6 . L u t z , C a t h e r i n e A . , a n d J a n e L . C o l l i n s . Reading National Geographic. C h i c a g o : U n i v e r s i t y o f C h i c a g o Press, 1993. M a c C a n n e l l , D e a n . Empty Meeting Grounds: The Tourist Papers. N e w Y o r k : R o u t l e d g e , 1992. . The Tourist: A New Theory of the Leisure Class. 1 9 7 6 . 2 d e d . N e w Y o r k : Schocken,1989. M a c D o n a l d , Dwight. "Parajournalism, o r T o m Wolfe and His Magic Writing M a c h i n e . " The Reporter as Artist, e d . R o n a l d W e b e r . N e w Y o r k : H a s t i n g s H o u s e , 1974. 223-33. M a l i n o w s k i , B r o n i s l a w . A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term. 1 9 6 7 . N e w Y o r k : H a r c o u r t , B r a c e a n d W o r l d , 1976. The Sexual Life of Savages in North Western Melanesia. 1 9 . 1 i ) . H o s l o n : H e l i c o n P r e s s , 11)87. i>.,i|K
W i i U M CI I l'l>
M a l r a u x , A n d r e . The Voices of Silence. 1 9 5 1 . T r a n s . S . G i l b e r t . N e w Y o r k : D o u bleday, 1953. M a n n , T h o m a s . Death in Venice and Other Stories. 1 9 1 2 . N e w Y o r k : K n o p f , 1 9 9 1 . M a s o n , P h i l i p . The English Gentleman: The Rise and Fall of an Ideal. L o n d o n : A n d r e D e u t s c h , 1982. M a t t h i e s s e n , P e t e r . The Cloud Forest: A Chronicle of the South American Wilder ness. N e w Y o r k : V i k i n g , 1 9 6 1 ; N e w Y o r k : P e n g u i n , 1 9 8 7 . . The Snow Leopard. N e w Y o r k : P e n g u i n , 1 9 8 7 . M a y l e , P e t e r . Acquired Tastes. N e w Y o r k : B a n t a m , 1 9 9 3 . . Toujours Provence. N e w Y o r k : V i n t a g e , 1 9 9 1 . . A Year in Provence. N e w Y o r k : V i n t a g e , 1 9 8 9 . M c C l i n t o c k , A n n e . " T h e A n g e l o f Progress: Pitfalls o f the T e r m ' P o s t - C o l o n i a l i s m . ' " Social Text 3 1 , n o . 2 ( 1 9 9 2 ) : 8 4 - 9 8 . M c G r a t h , M e l a n i e . Motel Nirvana: Dreaming of the New Age in the American Desert. N e w Y o r k : P i c a d o r , 1 9 9 5 . M c H a l e , B r i a n . Postmodernist Fiction. N e w Y o r k : M e t h u e n , 1 9 8 7 . M c L u h a n , M a r s h a l l . Understanding Media. N e w Y o r k : N e w A m e r i c a n L i b r a r y , 1964. M e a d , M a r g a r e t . Coming of Age in Samoa. 1 9 2 8 . N e w Y o r k : Q u i l l a n d M o r r o w , 1961. M e h t a , G i t a . Karma Cola: Marketing the Mystic East. N e w Y o r k : S i m o n a n d Schuster, 1979. M e l c h e t t , S o n i a . Passionate Quests: Five Modern Women Travellers. L o n d o n : F a b e r a n d F a b e r , 1991. M e l v i l l e , H e r m a n . Typee. 1 8 4 6 . N e w Y o r k : O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 9 6 . M e m m i , A l b e i t . The Colonizer and the Colonized. T r a n s . H o w a r d G r e e n f e l d . N e w Y o r k : O r i o n Press, 1965. M i d d l e t o n , N i c k . The Last Disco in Outer Mongolia. L o n d o n : S i n c l a i r - S t e v e n s o n , 1992. M i l l m a n , L a w r e n c e . Last Places: A Journey in the North. B o s t o n : H o u g h t o n M i f f l i n , 1990. M i l l s , S a r a . Discourses of Difference: An Analysis of Women's Travel Writing and Colonialism. L o n d o n : R o u t l e d g e , 1 9 9 1 . M i y o s h i , M a s a o . Off Center: Power and Culture Relations between Japan and the United States. C a m b r i d g e , M a s s . : H a r v a r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 9 1 . M o o r h e a d , A l a n . The Fatal Impact: An Account of the Invasion of the South Pacific, 1767-1840. N e w Y o r k : H a r p e r a n d R o w , 1 9 6 6 . M o r g a n . M a r i o . Mutant Message Down Under. 1 9 9 1 . N e w Y o r k : H a r p e r C o l l i n s , 1994M o r l e y , J o h n D a v i d . Pictures from the Water Trade: Adventures of a Westerner in Japan. B o s t o n : A t l a n t i c M o n t h l y P r e s s , 1 9 8 5 . M o r r i s , J a m e s . Farewell the Trumpets. L o n d o n : F a b e r a n d F a b e r , 1 9 7 8 . . Heaven's Command: An Imperial Progress. 1 9 7 3 . N e w Y o r k : H a r c o u r t Brace Jovanovich, 1974. . Pax Britannica: The Climax of an Empire. N e w Y o r k : H a r c o u r t B r a c e a n d W o r l d , 1968. M o r r i s , J a n . Conundrum. N e w Y o r k : H a r c o u r t B r a c e J o v a n o v i c h , 1 9 7 4 . Destinations: Essays from Rolling Stone. N e w Y o r k : O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y Press.
1980.
W O R K S c i i i;i>
249
. Last Letters from Haw N e w Y o r k : R a n d o m H o u s e , 1 9 8 5 . M o r r i s , M a r y . Nothing to Declare: Memoirs of a Woman Traveling Alone. 1 9 8 8 . N e w Y o r k : P e n g u i n , 1989. , e d . Maiden Voyages: Writings of Women Travelers. N e w Y o r k : V i n t a g e , 1993M o s e s , M i c h a e l V a l d c z . The Novel and the Globalization of Culture. N e w Y o r k : O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1996. M o s s , R o b i n . Enduring Dreams: An Exploration of Arctic Landscape. C o n c o r d , O n t a r i o : A n a n s i Press, 1994. M r a b e t , M o h a m e d . Chocolate Creams and Dollars. T r a n s . P a u l B o w l e s . N e w Y o r k : I n a n o u t Press, 1992. . Look and Move On. T r a n s . P a u l B o w l e s . L o n d o n : O w e n , 1 9 8 9 . . Love with a Few Hairs. T r a n s . P a u l B o w l e s . N e w Y o r k : G r o v e P r e s s , 1967. M u r p h y , D e r v l a . Full Tilt: Ireland to India with a Bicycle. 1 9 6 5 . W o o d s t o c k , N e w Y o r k : O v e r l o o k Press, 1986. N a i p a u l , V . S . An Area of Darkness. N e w Y o r k : V i k i n g , 1 9 6 4 . . A Bend in the River. N e w Y o r k : K n o p f , 1 9 7 9 . . " C o n r a d ' s D a r k n e s s . " The Return of Eva Peron. N e w Y o r k : K n o p f , 1 9 8 0 . 199-218. . The Enigma of Arrival. 1 9 8 7 . N e w Y o r k : K n o p f , 1 9 9 1 . . India: A Million Mutinies Now. L o n d o n : H e i n e m a n n , 1 9 9 0 . . India: A Wounded Civilization. 1 9 7 6 . N e w Y o r k : K n o p f , 1 9 7 7 . . The Middle Passage. L o n d o n : A n d r e D e u t s c h , 1 9 6 2 . . The Return of Eva Peron. N e w Y o r k : K n o p f , 1 9 8 0 . N e w b y , E r i c . The Big Red Train Ride. L o n d o n : P e n g u i n , 1 9 7 8 . . A Short Walk in the Hindu Kush. L o n d o n : P e n g u i n , 1 9 5 8 . . A Traveller's Life. L o n d o n : P a n , 1 9 8 2 . N i x o n , R o b . London Calling: V. S. Naipaul, Postcolonial Mandarin. O x f o r d : O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1992. . "Preparations f o r Travel: T h e Naipaul Brothers' Conradian A t a v i s m . " Research in African Literatures 22 ( 1 9 9 1 ) : 1 7 7 - 9 0 . O b e y e s e k e r e , G a n a n a t h . The Apotheosis of Captain Cook: European Mythmaking in the Pacific. P r i n c e t o n , N . J . : P r i n c e t o n U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 9 2 . O ' H a n l o n , R e d m o n d . Congo Journey. L o n d o n : H a m i s h H a m i l t o n , 1996. . Into the Heart of Borneo. 1 9 8 4 . N e w Y o r k : V i n t a g e , 1 9 8 7 . . In Trouble Again. N e w Y o r k : R a n d o m H o u s e , 1 9 8 8 . . Joseph Conrad and Charles Darwin: The Influence of Scientific Thought on Conrad's Fiction. E d i n b u r g h : S a l a m a n d e r P r e s s , 1 9 8 4 . P e a r s o n , B i l l . Rifled Sanctuaries: Some Views of the Pacific Islands in Western Lit erature to 1900. O x f o r d : O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 8 4 . P e a r s o n , I a n . " A r o u n d the W o r l d i n 6,000 Pages: A G u i d e t o the U l t i m a t e i n A r m c h a i r J o u r n e y s . " Toronto Globe and Mail Destinations, N o v e m b e r 1 9 9 2 , 1 5 - 2 4 . P h i l l i p s , C a r y l . The European Tribe. L o n d o n : F a b e r , 1 9 8 7 . P i c k l e s , J o h n . Phenomenology, Science and Geography. C a m b r i d g e : C a m b r i d g e U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1985. P o r t e r , D e n n i s . Haunted Journeys: Desire and Transgression in h'uropean Travel Writing. P r i n c c l o n . N . J . : P r i n c e t o n U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s . 1 9 9 1 . P r u l l , M a r y I.OIUM' l i c l d w o i k m ( ' o i i i n i c i i l P l a n - v " Writing Culture the Voetics
.!",!>
WOHNS ( I I i n
and Politics of Ethnography, e d . J a m e s C l i f f o r d a n d G e o r g e M a r c u s . B e r k e l e y a n d L o s A n g e l e s : U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a Press, 1986. 27-50. . Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. N e w Y o r k : R o u t ledge, 1992. Q u a m m c n , D a v i d . The Song of the Dodo: Island Biogeography in an Age of Extinc tions. N e w Y o r k : S c r i b n e r , 1 9 9 6 . Q u i n b y , L e e . ' T h e S u b j e c t o f M e m o i r s : The Woman Warrior's T e c h n o l o g y o f I d e o g r a p h i c S e l f h o o d . " Decolonizing the Subject: The Politics of Gender in Women's Autobiography, e d . S i d o n i e S m i t h a n d J u l i a W a t s o n . M i n n e a p o l i s : U n i v e r s i t y o f M i n n e s o t a Press, 1992. 2 9 7 - 3 2 0 . R a b a n , J o n a t h a n . Coasting. L o n d o n : C o l l i n s H a r v i l l , 1 9 8 6 . . Hunting Mister Heartbreak: A Discovery of America. L o n d o n : C o l l i n s H a r v i l l , 1990. R a b k i n , E r i c , M a r t i n G r e e n b e r g , a n d J o s e p h O l a n d e r , e d s . The End of the World. C a r b o n d a l e : S o u t h e r n Illinois U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1983. R a b y , P e t e r . Bright Paradise: Victorian Scientific Travellers. L o n d o n : P i m l i c o , 1996. R a d w a y , J a n i c e . Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Litera ture. C h a p e l H i l l : U n i v e r s i t y o f N o r t h C a r o l i n a P r e s s , 1 9 9 1 . R a v e n , S i m o n . The English Gentleman: An Essay in Attitudes. L o n d o n : A n t h o n y B l o n d , 1961. R e n n i e , N e i l . Far-Fetched Facts: The Literature of Travel and the Idea of the South Pacific. O x f o r d : O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 9 5 . R h o d e s , R o n . The New Age Movement. G r a n d R a p i d s , M i c h . : Z o n d c r v a n , 1 9 9 5 . R o b b , P e t e r . Midnight in Sicily. P o i n t P o t t s , N e w S o u t h W a l e s : D u n c a n a n d S n e l l g r o v e , 1996. Robertson, George, Melinda M a s h , Lisa Tickner, J o n Bird, Barry Curtis, a n d T i m P u t n a m , e d s . Travellers' Tales: Narratives of Home and Displacement. L o n d o n : R o u t l e d g e , 1994. R o s a l d o , R e n a t o . Culture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis. 1 9 8 9 . L o n d o n : R o u t l e d g e , 1993. R o s e , G i l l i a n . Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. M i n n e a p o l i s : U n i v e r s i t y o f M i n n e s o t a Press, 1993. R o u s e , Roger. " M e x i c a n M i g r a t i o n a n d t h e Social Space o f Postmodernism." Diaspora 1, n o . 1 ('1991)^8—23. R o u s s e a u , G . S . , a n d R o y P o r t e r , e d s . Exoticism in the Enlightenment. Manchester: M a n c h e s t e r U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1990. R u s h d i e , S a l m a n . Imaginary Homelands: Essays, 1981-1991. L o n d o n : G r a n t a B o o k s , 1991. . The Jaguar Smile: A Nicaraguan Journey. 1 9 8 7 . N e w Y o r k : P e n g u i n , 1 9 8 8 . . The Satanic Verses. L o n d o n : V i k i n g , 1 9 8 8 . S a h l i n s , M a r s h a l l . How "Natives" Think: About Captain Cook, for Example. C h i c a g o : U n i v e r s i t y o f C h i c a g o Press, 1995. S a i d , E d w a r d . Orientalism. N e w Y o r k : V i n t a g e , 1 9 7 8 . — — . " T r a v e l i n g T h e o r y . " The World, the Text, and the Critic. C a m b r i d g e , M a s s . : H a r v a r d U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1983. 2 2 6 - 4 7 . S a l z m a n , M a r k . Iron & Silk. N e w Y o r k : R a n d o m H o u s e , 1 9 S 6 . S n n s o m , I a n . " T r a v e l ' s E s s e n t i a l F u t i l i t y . " Guardian Weekly. J u n e 16, 1 9 9 6 , 2 8 . W O H K S C I ll.li
2SI
S a u e r b e r g , L a r s O l e . Fact into Fiction: Documentary Realism and the Contempo rary Novel. L o n d o n : M a c m i l l a n , 1 9 9 1 . S c h n e e b a u m , T o b i a s . Where the Spirits Dwell: An Odyssey into the New Guinea Jungle. N e w Y o r k : G r o v e P r e s s , 1 9 8 8 . S e g a l e n , V i c t o r . Essaisur I'exolisme: une esthetique du divers. P a r i s : F a t a M o r g a n a , 1986. S e r r e s , M i c h e l . Hermes: Literature. Science, Philosophy. T r a n s . J o s u e H a r a r i , D a v i d Bell, Susan Willey, S u z a n n e G u e r l a c , M a r i l y n Sides, M a r k A n d e r s o n , a n d L a w r e n c e Schehr. E d . J o s u e H a r a r i a n d D a v i d F . Bell. Baltimore: J o h n s H o p k i n s U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1982. S e t h , V i k r a m . From Heaven Lake. 1 9 8 3 . N e w Y o r k : V i n t a g e , 1 9 8 7 . S h o h a t , E l l a . " N o t e s o n t h e ' P o s t - C o l o n i a l . ' " Social Text 3 1 , n o . 2 ( 1 9 9 2 ) : 9 9 - 1 1 3 . S h o u m a t o f f , A l e x . African Madness. N e w Y o r k : K n o p f , 1 9 8 8 . S h o w a l t e r , E l a i n e . A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Bronte to Lessing. P r i n c e t o n , N . J . : P r i n c e t o n U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 7 7 . S h u k m a n , H e n r y . Savage Pilgrims: On the Road to Santa Fe. L o n d o n : H a r p e r C o l l i n s , 1996. S l a t e r , C a n d a c e . Dance of the Dolphin: Transformation and Disenchantment in the Amazonian Imagination. C h i c a g o : U n i v e r s i t y o f C h i c a g o P r e s s , 1 9 9 4 . S m i t h , A d a m . An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. E d . E d w i n C a n n a n . C h i c a g o : U n i v e r s i t y o f C h i c a g o Press, 1976. S m i t h , B e r n a r d . European Vision and the South Pacific. N e w H a v e n , C o n n . : Y a l e U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1985. S m i t h , S i d o n i e , a n d J u l i a W a t s o n , e d s . DelColonizing the Subject: The Politics of Gender in Women's Autobiography. M i n n e a p o l i s : U n i v e r s i t y o f M i n n e s o t a Press, 1992. S m i t h , V a l e n e , e d . Hosts and Guests: The Anthropology of Tourism. P h i l a d e l p h i a : U n i v e r s i t y o f Pennsylvania Press, 1 9 7 7 . S o n t a g , S u s a n . " N o t e s o n C a m p . " A Susan Sontag Reader. N e w Y o r k : F a r r a r , S t r a w s , G i r o u x , 1982. 1 0 5 - 2 0 . S p e n d e r , S t e p h e n . The Temple. L o n d o n : F a b e r a n d F a b e r , 1 9 8 8 . S p i v a k , G a y a t r i C h a k r a v o r t y . In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. N e w Y o r k : M e t h u e n , 1987. S p u f f o r d , F r a n c i s . / May Be Some Time: Ice and the English Imagination. L o n d o n : F a b e r a n d F a b e r , 1996. S p u r r , D a v i d . The Rhetoric of Empire: Colonial Discourse in Journalism, Travel Writing, and Imperial Administration. D u r h a m , N . C . : D u k e U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1993S t e v e n s o n , R o b e r t L o u i s . " T h e B e a c h o f F a l e s a . " Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde and Other Stories. L o n d o n : P e n g u i n , 1 9 7 9 . 9 9 - 1 7 0 . . Travels with a Donkey. 1 8 7 9 . N e w Y o r k : L i m i t e d E d i t i o n s , 1 9 5 7 . S u g n e t , C h a r l e s . " V i l e B o d i e s , V i l e P l a c e s : T r a v e l i n g w i t h Granta." Transition 51 (1991): 7 0 - 8 5 . S u l e r i , S a r a . Meatless Days. C h i c a g o : U n i v e r s i t y o f C h i c a g o P r e s s , 1 9 8 9 . . The Rhetoric of English India. C h i c a g o : U n i v e r s i t y o f C h i c a g o P r e s s , 1 9 9 2 . S w i f t , J o n a t h a n . Gulliver's Travels. 1 7 2 6 . N e w Y o r k : S i g n e t , i 9 6 0 . T a u s s i g , M i c h a e l . Shamanism, Colonialism, and the Wild Man. C h i c a g o : U n i v e r sity o f C h i c a g o P r e s s , 1 9 8 7 .
Jl 5 3
W O K US C I I Kit
T h e r o u x , P a u l . The Happy Isles of Oceania: Paddling the Pacific. N e w Y o r k : G . P . P u t n a m ' s S o n s , 1992. . The Kingdom by the Sea: A Journey around Great Britain. N e w Y o r k : W a s h i n g t o n S q u a r e P r e s s , 1983. . My Other Life: A Novel. L o n d o n : H a m i s h H a m i l t o n , 1996. . The Old Patagonian Express: By Train through the Americas. B o s t o n : H o u g h t o n M i f f l i n , 1979. . The Pillars of Hercules: A Grand Tour of the Mediterranean. N e w Y o r k : G . P . P u t n a m ' s S o n s , 1995. T h e s i g e r , W i l f r e d . Arabian Sands. N e w Y o r k : D u t t o n , 1959. . My Kenya Days. L o n d o n : H a r p e r C o l l i n s , 1994. T i s d a l e , Sallie. " N e v e r L e t the L o c a l s See Y o u r M a p : W h y M o s t T r a v e l W r i t e r s S h o u l d S t a y H o m e . " Harper's, S e p t e m b e r 1995, 66-74. . Talk Dirty to Me: An Intimate Philosophy of Sex. N e w Y o r k : D o u b l e d a y , 1994. T o d o r o v , T z v e t a n . On Human Diversity: Nationalism, Racism, and Exoticism in French Thought. T r a n s . C a t h e r i n e P o r t e r . C a m b r i d g e , M a s s . : H a r v a r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1993. T o r g o v n i c k , M a r i a n n a . Gone Primitive: Savage Intellects, Modern Lives. C h i c a g o : U n i v e r s i t y o f C h i c a g o P r e s s , 1990. T r i n h T . M i n h - h a . Woman, Native, Other: Writing Feminism and Postcoloniality. B l o o m i n g t o n : I n d i a n a U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1989. T u a n Y i - F u . " G e o p i e t y : A T h e m e in M a n ' s A t t a c h m e n t t o N a t u r e a n d Place." Geographies of the Mind, e d . D a v i d L o w e n t h a l a n d M a r t y n B o w d e n . N e w Y o r k : O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1976. 11-39. . Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. E n g l e w o o d C l i f f s , N . J . : P r e n t i c e - H a l l , 1974. T w a i n , M a r k . The Innocents Abroad. 1869. O x f o r d : O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1996. T y l o r , E d w a r d . Primitive Culture. 1871. N e w Y o r k : H a r p e r , 1958. V a n d e n A b b e e l e , G e o r g e s . " S i g h t s e e r s : T h e T o u r i s t a s T h e o r i s t . " Diacritics 10 ( w i n t e r 1980): 2-14. . Travel as Metaphor: From Montaigne to Rousseau. M i n n e a p o l i s : U n i v e r s i t y o f M i n n e s o t a P r e s s , 1992. V a n d e r P o s t . L a u r e n s . The Lost World of the Kalahari. N e w Y o r k : M o r r o w , 1958. V a r a w a , J o a n a M c l n t y r e . Changes in Latitude: An Uncommon Anthropology. N e w Y o r k : H a r p e r a n d R0WJI1989. V e b l e n , T h o r s t e i n . The. Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institu tions. 1899. N e w Y o r k : N e w A m e r i c a n L i b r a r y , 1953. V e n u t i , L a w r e n c e , e d . Rethinking Translation: Discourse, Subjectivity, Ideology. N e w Y o r k : R o u t l e d g e , 1992. V i r i l i o , P a u l . Speed and Politics: An Essay on Dromology. T r a n s . M a r k P o l i z z o t t i . N e w Y o r k : C o l u m b i a U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1986. V i v i a n o , F r a n k . Dispatches from the Pacific Century. R e a d i n g , M a s s . : A d d i s o n W e s l e y , 1993. W a l c o l t , D e r e k . " T h e C a r i b b e a n : C u l t u r e o r M i m i c r y ? " Journal of Inleramerican Studies and World Affairs 16 (1974): 3-13. W a r l e y , L i n d a . " A s s e m b l i n g Ingredients: Subjectivity i n Meatless Days." Autolliiogruphyj, n o . 1 (1992): 107 23.
WOHKN CU'I'D
%S\
Watt, Ian. The Rise of the Novel. 1 9 5 7 . N e w Y o r k : Oxford University Press, 1 9 7 1 . W a u g h , Evelyn. Brideshead Revisited. 1 9 4 6 . London: Everyman's Library, 1 9 9 3 . . Preface to A Short Walk in the Hindu Kush, by Eric N e w b y . London: Pen guin, 1 9 5 8 . When the Going Was Good. London: Duckworth, 1 9 4 6 . Weber, Ronald, ed. The Reporter as Artist: A Look at the New Journalism Contro versy. N e w Y o r k : Hastings House, 1 9 7 4 . Welch, Denton. Maiden Voyage. London: Routledge and K e g a n Paul, 1 9 4 3 . Wendt, Albert. Flying-Fox in a Freedom Tree. Auckland, N e w Zealand: Longman, 1974. . " T o w a r d a N e w Oceania." Writers in East-West Encounter, ed. G u y Amirthanayagam. London: Macmillan, 1 9 8 2 . 2 0 2 - 1 5 . Wheeler, Sara. Terra Incognita: Travels in Antarctica. London: Jonathan Cape, 1996. Wheeler, Valerie. "Travelers' Tales: Observations on the Travel B o o k and Ethnog raphy." Anthropological Quarterly 59, no. 2 ( 1 9 8 6 ) : 5 2 - 6 3 . White, Edmund. States of Desire: Travels in Gay America. N e w Y o r k : E. P. Dutton, 1 9 8 0 . White, Hayden. "Fictions o f Factual Representation." The Literature of Fact, ed. A n g u s Fletcher. N e w Y o r k : Columbia University Press, 1 9 7 6 . 2 1 - 4 4 . White, Patrick. Flaws in the Glass. London: Jonathan Cape, 1 9 8 1 . Wiebe. Rudy. Playing Dead: A Contemplation Concerning the Arctic. Edmonton: NeWest, 1989. Wilde, Oscar. "The Decay o f Lying." Complete Works. London: Collins, 1 9 4 8 . 970-92. Wills, David. Prosthesis. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1 9 9 5 . Wilson, Alexander. The Culture of Nature: North American Landscape from Disney to the Exxon Valdez. 1 9 9 1 . Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell, 1 9 9 2 . Winchester, Simon. Outposts. London: Hoddcr and Stoughton, 1 9 8 5 . . Pacific Rising. London: Hutchinson, 1 9 9 1 . W o o d c o c k , George. A South Sea Journey. London: Faber, 1 9 7 6 . Wolff, Janet. " O n the R o a d Again: Metaphors o f Travel in Cultural Criticism." Cultural Studies 7 , no. 2 ( 1 9 9 3 ) : 2 2 4 - 3 9 . Wright, Ronald. On Fiji Islands. N e w Y o r k : Viking, 1986. . Time among the Maya: Travels in Belize, Guatemala, and Mexico. N e w Y o r k : Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1 9 8 9 . Wurlitzer, Rudolph. Hard Travel to Sacred Places. Boston: Shambala, 1 9 9 4 . Y o u n g , Gavin. In Search of Conrad. 1 9 9 1 . London: Penguin, 1 9 9 2 . Y o u n g s , Tim. Travellers in Africa: British Travelogues, 1850-1000. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1 9 9 4 .
I
w n H R S CITIKD
I N D E X
ben Hamed Charhardi, Driss (Larbi Layachi), 143 Bennett, Catherine, 200-201, 202 Berlin, 138-42 Bhabha, Homi, 22, 47 Bongie, Christopher, 96, 97 borders. See boundaries Borges, Jorge Luis. 216 Borneo, 79 Bororo, 39
Aborigines (Australian), 122-23, 169-70,189-90 Ackerley, J. R., 138,139; Hindoo Holi day: An Indian Journal, 136-37 Ackerman, Diane, 190-91; The Rarest of the Rare . . . , 184-88 Adams, James Eli, 37 Adams, Percy, 9 Afghanistan, 117 Africa, 69-76, 210-12 A I D S , xii, 21, 7 4 - 7 6 , 1 7 2 Alexander, Brian, 78 A m a z o n , 68, 76-81 America. See United States o f America anachronism, xiii, 6 , 1 5 , 28, 34, 42, 71, 79, 212-13 Antigua, 49-50, 52 antitravel text. See counterdiscourse antitraveler, 1 5 3 - 5 4 Appadurai, Arjun, 64 Arctic, 68,100-110 Asia, 60-64, 88,164-66 Auden, W. H., 138-40 Australia, 121-23
Bougainville, Louis, 92 boundaries, 59-60,134,199, 204, 217; cultural, 136 Bowles, Jane, 143,145 Bowles, Paul, viii, 18,142-49 B o y ' s O w n , 77 Brazil, 77-78 British Empire. See imperialism Brody, Hugh, 103 Brooke, James 30 Bryson, Bill, viii, 50 Buck-Morris, Susan, 126 Buhasz, Laszlo, 207 Burgess, Anthony, 175-76 Burma. See M y a n m a r Burroughs, William, 142,143,145; Naked Lunch, 146-47 Burton, Richard, 211 Bushmen (Kalahari), 180-84 Busi, A l d o , 18, 2 1 , 1 4 2 , 1 5 2 , 1 5 3 ; Sodomies in Elevenpoint, 147-49 Buzard, James, 2-3 Byron, Robert, 27, 28, 32, 35, 203, 205, 206, 217
autobiography, 1 2 , 1 4 , 1 7 , 1 2 9 , 1 3 1 , 144-45,150,153,175-78 Bali, 62,166 Bandy, Joe, 178-79 Barthes, Roland, 6, 21, 69, 82,160, 162, 164, 172-73; Empire of Signs, 88-90 Brfudrillard, Jean, 160,161,166; Amer ica, 24, 1 6 1 - 6 3 Udukid, A l i , 4 7 beluledness, xi, xii, 5 6 , 22 23, 28, 30, ,|2, 95- 96, 191, 195, 197 lii-ll. G a v i n , 9 3 , 95. 97. 98 99
Cahill, Tim, 6, 77 Cairo, 119-21 Callenbach, Lniest, 178
a w
C a l v i n o , Italo, 1 5 8 , 1 6 1 , 1 6 3 , 1 6 6 , 1 6 9 ; Invisible Cities, 1 5 8 - 6 0 , 1 7 7 camp, 3 4 - 3 5 , 3 9 , 4 6 , 153 Campbell, A l a n , 7 8 C a m p b e l l , M a r y , 15 Carless, Hugh, 3 2 - 3 5 , 4 6 - 4 7 Carter, Paul, 1 7 0 Casablanca, 1 2 1 C a s t r o n o v o , D a v i d , 2 8 , 33 Caulfield, Annie, 208 Cavafy, C . P., 2 1 1 Chamberlain, Richard, 8 5 Chambers, Iain, 1 6 6 - 6 7 , 1 6 9 Chatwin, Bruce, viii, 6 , 9 , 1 0 , 1 3 , 1 7 - 1 8 , 21, 23, 35-40, 42, 44, i2i, 1 6 7 - 7 0 , 1 7 7 , 2 0 0 , 2 0 5 , 2 1 1 ; The Songlines, 3 9 , 1 2 3 , 169 China, 2 2 , 5 6 - 5 7 , 59, 6 2 Choukri, Mohammed, 143 class, x, 4 , 4 3 , 4 9 - 5 0 , 1 3 2 , 1 3 4 , 1 3 5 , 1 3 6 , 139,154 Clifford, James, ix, 2 , i n , 181 C o c k e r , M a r k , 1, 4 colonialism, 7 3 - 7 4 , 7 6 , 9 2 , 1 0 3 - 4 , 1 3 0 - 3 1 , 1 4 1 , 1 6 4 ; anticolonialism. 1 1 4 , 1 1 5 ; neo-colonialism, 4 9 , 53, 7 3 , 1 7 9 ; and sexuality, 1 4 6 , 1 4 8 - 4 9 . See also postcolonialism commodification, 2 9 , 4 8 , 1 2 6 , 1 6 4 , 1 8 5 , 2 0 4 , 2 0 9 ; cultural, 3 , 1 5 - 1 6 , 6 2 - 6 4 , 1 2 8 , 1 4 3 . T 7 8 - 8 0 , 1 9 1 , 1 9 5 , 2 1 7 ; spiri tual, 1 7 9 , 1 9 2 ; o f travel writing, 1 1 3 , 1 2 2 - 2 4 , 1 3 . 1 8 7 - 8 9 , 1 9 7 - 9 9 , 2 0 2 , 203 Condi Nast Traveler, 1, 2 0 6 C o n d o n , Sean, 2 0 8 - 9 C o n g o . See Democratic Republic of Congo
counter-Orientalist, 5 9 , 6 5 ; countertravel, 50, 1 9 8 - 9 9 counternarrative. See counterdiscourse cross-dressing, 2 0 , 1 1 7 - 1 8 , 1 3 5 , 1 3 6 dandyism, 3 6 - 4 0 Dante, Alighieri, 1 7 3 , 1 7 4 Davidson, Basil, 6 9 - 7 0 Davidson, R o b y n , 2 0 , 1 2 8 , 1 3 2 , 2 0 1 ; Tracks, 1 2 1 - 2 3 de Chirico, G i o r g i o , 4 4 deferral, 1 0 0 , 105 de Lauretis, Teresa, 1 1 2 Democratic Republic o f C o n g o ( C o n g o , Zaire), 6 9 - 7 6 Derrida, Jacques. 8 9 , 1 7 0 Desai, Anita, 2 0 Descola, Philippe, 7 8 Dessaix, Robert: Night Letters, 1 7 0 - 7 4 destination, 1 5 8 , 1 5 9 displacement, viii, ix, 2 , 1 0 , 2 0 , 2 3 , 4 3 , 5 1 , 5 5 , 6 0 , 1 3 1 ; originary, 4 2 Dodwell,Christina, 1 3 2 During, Simon, 6 4 Durrell, Lawrence, 153 Eberhardt, Isabelle, 2 0 , 1 1 8 Eco, U m b e r t o , 2 4 , 1 6 0 - 6 2 , 1 6 4 ecological effects o f travel (ccotourism), xii. 7 6 , 7 8 , 1 0 1 , 1 0 5 - 6 , 178-80,183-89,191,193-95,198 Egypt, 5 6 - 6 0 emancipation. See freedom emigration. See migration Empson, William, 4 0 England, 4 3 , 4 4 eroticism, 6 8 , 9 2 , 1 1 6 - 1 7 , 1 2 5 , 1 2 7 ; o f culture, 8 1 , 8 2 , 8 6 - 8 7 , 8 9 , 1 4 8 , 1 5 3 ; homoeroticism, 1 1 9 , 1 3 4 - 3 5 , 5 3 ^ tual, 8 4 , 1 3 6 essentialism, 38, 7 0 , 7 5 , 1 1 3 , 1 4 9 , 1 5 4 , 1 6 1 , 1 6 3 , 1 6 7 , 1 9 2 - 9 3 , 1 9 9 ; cultural, 72-73, 90,120,125 ethnocentrism, viii, 5, 1 1 , 2 0 - 2 1 , 33, 4 3 , 51, 8 8 , 1 0 9 , 1 2 9 - 3 0 , 1 6 1 , 1 6 6 , 1 6 8 , 1 7 8 , 198
2
(
C o n r a d , Joseph, 30, 6 9 - 7 3 , 7 5 * 7 » - 1 7 5 , 211 Constantinople. See Istanbul consumption. 4 0 - 4 2 , 4 8 , 1 2 8 . 1 7 9 - 8 0 , 1 8 7 , 1 9 3 , 1 9 9 ; conspicuous. 4 0 , 1 6 6 ; cultural, 6 2 , 6 5 ; over-, 1 5 5 C o o k , Captain James, 9 1 , 9 2 , 93, 9 7 Cortazzi, Hugh, 8 4 counterculture, 1 4 2 , 1 6 5 , 1 7 8 , 189 counterdiscourse, 4 1 , 4 5 , 54, 6 4 65, 1 3 7 ; h i s t o r i c a l , 5 7 ; i l l u s i o n a r y , 96;
T
e t h n o g r a p h y , 5 7 , 86, 88, 91 1 6 9 , 1 K 5 ; salvsip.c, 1 7 9 , 180
IN
h i
s
92, i n ,
t e x _
127,
8i; |ravel
writing as, 1 8 . 6 8 , 9 4 - 9 5 , 9 7 - 9 8 , 1 4 9 - 5 1 ; vs. travel writing, 1 1 - 1 3 , 33, 68 Eurocentrism. See ethnocentrism Europe, 4 9 , 1 6 1 - 6 3 Evans, Julian, 9 3 , 9 4 - 9 5 , 96, 9 9 exhaustion, 2 0 2 - 6 , 2 1 3 , 2 1 5 exoticism, 2 , 1 8 - 1 9 , 4 8 , 64, 86, 9 0 , 1 2 5 , 1 3 0 - 3 2 , 1 3 8 , 1 4 6 , 1 8 7 , 2 0 0 : o f cul tures, 6 1 , 9 2 ; o f memory, 9 4 - 9 5 , 9 7 ; of "Other," viii, 5, 6 5 , 1 8 2 ; o f places, 38, 9 9 , 1 2 7 , 1 2 8 , 1 6 6 , 1 9 8 , 2 0 4 ; sexual, 133 farce, 2 9 - 3 1 feminization, 68, 8 1 - 8 5 , 8 9 - 9 0 , 1 1 2 , 1 2 4 , 133, 138, Hi, 144 feminism, xii, 1 1 3 - 1 4 , 1 2 2 , 1 2 3 , 1 3 2 ; and geography, 1 1 2 , 1 1 7 Fenton, James, 30, 7 9 Fleming, Peter, 2 7 , 68; Brazilian Adventure, 7 7 - 7 8 Forster, E. M . , 1 3 8 ; A Passage to India, 136 Foucault, Michel, 1 7 3 Franklin, John, 1 0 1 - 4 Fraser, K e a t h , 2 3 - 2 4 freedom, ix, xiii, 6 4 , 1 2 4 , 1 2 8 , 1 4 0 , 1 4 2 , 1 5 1 , 1 6 9 ; sexual, 8 7 , 1 3 8 , 1 4 8 , 1 5 2 - 5 3 , 1 9 8 ; textual, 1 7 6 , 2 1 4 ; o f travel, 4 , 2 0 - 2 1 , 46, 55, 5 9 , 1 1 6 - 1 7 , 1 3 3 - 3 4 , 154, 1 7 2 ; of women, 9 3 , 9 4 , 1 1 3 , 1 1 4 , 1 2 1 , 132 Freud, Sigmund, 1 3 8 , 1 3 9 Frommer, Arthur, 2 0 7 Frow, John, 1 2 6 ^ Furon, R a y m o n d , 3 2 Fussell, Paul, vii, 3 , 9 - 1 0 , 1 2 , 1 4 , 2 7 , 4 8 , 1 0 9 , i n , 1 9 7 , 2 0 3 , 205
2
gentlemanliness, xi, 6 - 7 , 2 2 - 2 3 , 5> 2 8 - 3 7 , 3 9 - 4 7 ; - dandyism, 3 6 - 3 7 G h o s h , A m i t a v , 2 2 , 65; In an Antique Land, 5 6 - 6 0 Gide, A n d r e , 6 9 - 7 0 Gilbert Islands, 9 7 globalization, 2 , 8 , 6 4 , 9 7 , 1 6 1 , 1 7 8 - 7 9 , 1 8 5 , 1 9 2 , 1 9 8 , 2 0 5 , 2 0 9 , 2 1 3 ; o f cul ture, 2 2 , 6 2 , 1 6 4 - 6 6 , 1 9 9 , 2 1 7 global village, 1 6 8 , 1 9 8 Granta, 1, 5, 2 0 6 Greek Islands, 1 5 3 - 5 4 Green, Martin, 4 Green, Michelle, 1 4 3 Greenblatt, Stephen, 1 5 - 1 6 Greene, G r a h a m , 2 7 , 1 7 5 , 2 1 7 Gregory, Derek, 9 1 - 9 2 Grewal, Inderpal, 4, 4 7 , 131 Grizzuti Harrison, Barbara, 1 3 2 Guardian Weekly, 2 0 0 - 2 0 2 guidebook, 9 , 1 5 1 , 1 9 7 , 2 0 0 , 208 Gunther, John, 2 0 9 - 1 0 , 2 1 1 , 2 1 3 v s
Habegger, Larry, 2 0 7 Hall, Radclyffe, 138 H a m b u r g (Germany), 1 4 1 Haynes, Jim, 2 0 7 Hearst, William Randolph, 161 Herdt, Gilbert, 1 4 9 , 1 5 0 history, 5 6 - 6 0 , 7 0 , 7 4 , 1 0 2 , 1 5 7 - 5 8 , 1 6 0 , 1 6 2 , 1 8 3 , 1 9 8 , 1 9 9 , 2 1 2 ; alternative, 1 2 9 - 3 1 ; cultural, x, 1 6 1 , 1 6 9 , 1 8 4 ; o f exploration/travel, 1 0 0 , i n , 1 7 0 , 2 0 4 ; imperialist, 4 6 ; mythicized, 7 6 , 1 8 3 Hobson, Sarah, 1 1 8 Homer: Odyssey, 1 1 2 Hornby, John, 1 0 7 Horwell, Veronica, 1 6 8 - 6 9 , Hyland, Noelle, 7 1 2 0 2
Hyland, Paul, 7 0 , 7 6 ; The Black G a g n e , R a y m o n d , 103 Galoa, 1 2 4 - 2 5 Garber, Marjorie, 1 1 8 G a u g u i n , Paul, 9 6 gay liberation, 1 5 1 - 5 3 gay travel, 1 3 3 - 5 5 , 198 gender, x, xii, 4 , 3 7 , 39, 4 7 , 50, 88, n o 55, 198
Heart,
69-73 hyperreality, 1 6 0 - 6 2 , T 7 7 , 1 9 8 Ignatieff, Michael, 1 4 imperialism, ix, x, xi, xii, xiii, 2 8 , 4 3 - 4 8 , 5 7 - 5 8 , 6 7 , 69, 7 5 , 1 1 4 , 1 1 9 - 2 0 , 1 3 2 , 1 3 8 , 1 6 4 , 1 8 4 , 1 9 4 - 9 5 , 1 9 9 ; con nection to travel writing, 1 5 - 1 6 ;
INDlx
•7
imperialism (continued) cultural, 4 8 , 6 1 , 6 3 - 6 4 , 1 6 5 ; discourse of, 1 3 0 ; media, 1 2 2 ; myths of, 4 - 5 , 2 9 - 3 0 , 4 4 - 4 5 ; neo-imperialism, 5 8 , 9 6 ; postimperial era, 2 3 , 2 5 , 3 1 - 3 2 , 4 5 , 1 1 4 , 2 0 0 . See also nostalgia: imperialist imposture, 3 5 - 3 6 , 3 8 , 4 3 , 4 5 , 7 8 - 7 9 , 88 India, 1 8 - 1 9 , 4 3 . 5 6 - 6 0 , 1 3 6 - 3 8 Inuit, 1 0 1 Iran, 3 4 , 2 1 2 Iraq, 5 9 - 6 0 Irvine, Lucy: Castaway, 1 2 3 - 2 8 Isherwood, Christopher, 1 3 8 - 4 0 , 1 5 2 , 2 1 5 ; Goodbye to Berlin, 1 3 9 - 4 0 Istanbul, 3 4 Iyer, Pico, 1 0 , 1 8 , 2 1 , 6 5 , 8 2 , 8 6 , 8 7 , 8 9 , 9 0 ; The Lady and the Monk, 8 3 - 8 6 ; Video Night in Kathmandu, 2 2 , 60-64, 164-67 Jacquemond, Richard, 1 4 3 - 4 4 Japan, 6 8 , 8 1 - 9 0 , 91 Joyce, James, 1 3 8 Kalahari Desert, 1 7 9 - 8 4 K a n e , Joe, 7 8 K a n g a . Firdaus, 2 2 K a p l a n , Robert D . , 2 1 5 ; The Ends of the Earth: A Journey at the Dawn of the 20th Century, 2 0 9 - 1 3 Keats, John, 91 Kincaid, Jamaica, 2 0 , 2 1 , 5 3 , 5 4 , 6 5 ; A Small Place, 4 8 - 5 2 Kinglake, Alexander, 2 0 5 Kingsland, Gerald, 1 2 4 K o r n , Eric, 2 0 7 Kristeva, Julia, 8 9 Kuhn, Thomas, 199 Kyoto, 83 Lacan, Jacques, 8 9 Lampedusa, Giuseppe, 2 1 5 landscape, 6 9 - 7 0 , 1 0 2 , 1 0 9 , 2 1 7 Lascaris, Manoly, 1 5 3 - 5 4 Lawrence, D . H., 138 Lawrence, Karen, 112
Lawrence, T . E. (Lawence o f Arabia), 119 Leed, Eric, 2 , 1 1 1 Leigh Fcrmor, Patrick, 6, 1 5 , 2 8 , 1 5 3 , 205 Levi-Strauss, Claude, vii, 1 2 , 1 8 , 7 7 , 7 8 , 9 9 , 1 7 9 , 180, 1 8 1 , 1 8 2 , 1 9 5 , 1 9 7 Lonely Planet series, 2 0 0 , 2 0 8 - 9 , Lopez, Barry, 9, 1 8 4 - 8 5 , 1 8 7 , 1 9 5 , 2 1 1 ; Arctic Dreams, 1 0 0 - 1 0 9 Loti, Pierre, 8 1 - 8 3 , 8 5 , 8 6 , 8 8 ; Madame Chrysantheme, 8 2 L o w e , Lisa, 9 0 Luanza, 7 1 2 1 1
MacCannell, Dean, 2 - 3 Malinowski. Bronislavv, 9 2 - 9 3 Malraux, Andre, 38 Malthus, T h o m a s , 2 1 1 Mann, Thomas, 1 7 3 , 211 Marquesa Islands, 9 6 , 9 8 - 9 9 Marshall Islands, 9 6 M a s o n , Philip, 3 3 Matthiessen, Peter, 9 , 1 7 , 7 8 , 1 8 4 , 1 9 5 ; The Cloud Forest: A Chronicle of the South American Wilderness, 1 8 0 - 8 3 M a y l e , Peter, viii, 1 , 1 5 , 4 0 - 4 2 , 4 4 , 2 1 4 ; A Year in Provence, 4 0 ; Toujours Provence, 4 1 - 4 2 M c G r a t h , Melanie: Motel Nirvana: Dreaming of the New Age in the American Desert, 1 9 1 - 9 4 , 1 9 5 M c H a l e , Brian, 6 7 - 6 8 M c l n e r n y , Jay, 1 4 3 M c L u h a n , Marshall, 6 2 , 1 6 4 , 1 6 8 M e a d , Margaret, 9 2 , 1 2 7 Melchett, Sonia, 1 1 3 Melville, Herman, 6 8 ; Typee, 9 3 - 9 4 ,
97 M e m m i , Albert, 1 1 5 memoir, 1 4 , 4 4 , 1 0 7 , 1 3 1 , 2 1 7 Mexico, 116 migration (migrancy), ix, xii, 5 5 , 6 0 , 131, r 6 9 - 7 0 , 1 7 7 , 187 M i l l s , S a r a , 4 , 114, 132 M o o r h e a d , A l a n , 96 9 7
M o r g a n , M a r i o : Mutant Message Down Under, 1 7 9 8 0 , 189 9 0
^,58
(NIH'.K
M o r l e y , J o h n D a v i d , 18, 21, 82, 89; Pic tures from the Water Trade, 86-88 M o r o c c o , 142-49 M o r r i s , J a n ( J a m e s ) , v i i i , 6, 20, 118-21; Conundrum, 120-21 M o r r i s , M a r y , 20,113,131; Nothing to Declare, 114-18 M o s s , J o h n : Enduring Dreams, 100-110 M r a b e t , M o h a m m e d , 143; Look and Move On, 144-46 M u r p h y , D e r v l a , 17, 20,128,132, 205; Full Tilt, 114-18 M u r u r o a , 96 M y a n m a r , 200-201 m y t h s , 23, 45, 74, 81, 9 1 , 1 0 1 , 1 3 7 , 1 4 2 , 160, 163,164, 185,188, 2 1 1 ; c u l t u r a l , v i i i , x , x i , 3, 5-7, 8, 7 1 - 7 2 , 1 2 3 , 1 4 4 , 184; o f g e n d e r , 4, 93, i n , 122-24, 127-28; i m p e r i a l i s t , 25, 45, 6 1 , 1 2 1 ; N e w A g e , 179,191; O r i e n t a l i s t , 34; p e r s o n a l , 33,169; o f p l a c e , x i i , x i i i , 3, 65, 67-69; p r i m a l , 186; r o m a n t i c , 181, 194; o f t r a v e l , 25, 34, 94,190, 201, 209 N a g a s a k i , 81-82 N a i p a u l , V . S . , v i i i , 6, 1 0 , 1 1 , 1 3 , 1 8 - 1 9 , 42-45, 5i, 55, 57, 7 C 72, 7 3 - 7 4 , 7576, 213; The Enigma of Arrival, 44-45; The Return of Eva Peron, 73-74 National Geographic, 1. 18, 122-23 N e r u d a , P a b l o , 101 N e w A g e t r a v e l , x i i , 178-95 N e w b y , E r i c . 6 , 1 3 , 1 5 , 1 8 , 23, 27-29, 31-36. 37, 39, 41, 42, 43, 45, 4QJ 52, 119, 203, 205; A Short Walk in the Hindu Kush, 32-35, 46-47, 117; A . Traveller's Life, 34 N i c a r a g u a , 53-55 N i x o n , R o b , n , 30, 44. 73 n o m a d i s m , 3 8 , 1 6 7 - 7 0 , 1 7 2 , 177-78, 198, 212 N o r t h w e s t P a s s a g e , 101-2 n o s t a l g i a , x i , x i i , 5, 8, 2 0 , 24-25, 2 8 - 2 9 , 40, 4 5 - 4 6 , 5 2 , 59, 8 4 , 86, 9 7 , 99, 114, 120, 1 2 9 - 3 0 , 1 6 6 , 1 9 1 , 197, 2 0 3 4 ; cul tural, 4 4 - 4 5 . 4 8 . i p , n y , imperialist,
1 Nli I
15, 29, 33-34, 36. 42-43,199; i n s t a n t , 161-62,164; p r i m i t i v i s t , 180,181 N u r i s t a n , 33-35 O c c i d e n t , 90 O ' H a n l o n , R e d m o n d , 6 , 1 3 , 1 7 - 1 8 , 23, 29, 30-32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 42, 43, 45, 46, 52, 68, 77, 78-81,119,187, 205, 206, 208; In Trouble Again, 79-80 O ' R e i l l y , J a m e s , 207 O r i e n t , 81-90 O r i e n t a l i s m , 58-59, 83-86, 90 o r i g i n s , 13, 44; c u l t u r a l , x i , x i i , 22, 43; o f i d e n t i t y , 43 P a k i s t a n , 129-30 P a p u a N e w G u i n e a , 149-51 p a r o d y , 33, 38, 7 7 - 7 8 , 1 2 5 , 1 6 6 , 1 9 7 , 198 Pearson,Ian,205 P e r s i a . See I r a n P e r u , 180,182 P h i l l i p s , C a r y l , 21, 53, 54, 55, 65; 7 7 i c European Tribe, 48-52 P i c a d o r T r a v e l C l a s s i c s series, 205-6 P o r t e r , D e n n i s , v i i i , 2, 5, 42, 89-90, i n P o r t e r , R o y , 19 p o s t c o l o n i a l i s m , x , x i i . 4-5, 22, 43-45, 47-48, 52, 63-65, 7 3 , 1 3 1 , 1 6 4 - 6 5 , 170,198 p o s t c o l o m a l i t y , x i , 48, 64,129, 202 p o s t m o d e r n i s m , x , x i i , 4 , 1 5 , 67-68, 1 4 6 , 1 5 4 - 5 5 , 1 5 7 - 9 5 . ' 9 ^ , 202, 216 P r a t t , M a r y L o u i s e , v i i i , i x . 2, 4, 5 , 1 5 , 47, 61, 183-84,185,194 P r o v e n c e , 40-42 P u c c i n i , G i a c o m o , 81-82 Q u a m m e n , D a v i d , 195; The Song of the Dodo: Island Biogeography in an Age of Extinction, 179, 184-85, 187-89' q u e s t . 17, 83, 94, 95, 114, 128, 172. 199, 204, 216; s e x u a l , 8 6 - 8 7 , 1 3 5 , 1 3 6 , 1 4 5 , 150; s p i r i t u a l , 102, 179, 182, 186, 191-92 Q u i n b y , L e e , 14 R a b a n , J o n a t h a n , 6, 13, 176-77, 200, 2 0 5 , 216 17
race (racism), 4, 5, 48-51, 132,135, 179 Raven, Simon, 29 reminiscence. See nostalgia representation, 58, 63-64, 70,120,128, 159,167: and culture, viii, 64, 81, 164; imperialist, 43; of subject, 134; vir tual, 166 R o b b , Peter: Midnight in Sicily, 213-16 Roberts, Martin, 2, 64 Rogers, Michael, 142 Rosaldo, Renato, 15, 29 Rose, Gillian, 112 Rouse, Roger, 22 Rousseau, G. S., 19 Rushdie, Salman, 62, 65; The Jaguar's Smile, 53-55
Stark, Freya, 132 St. A u b i n de Teran, Lisa, 113 Stefansson, Vihjalmur, 103 Sterne, Laurence, 175 Stevenson, Robert Louis, 68, 93, 94-95, 96, 98-99, 127, 205 subject (subjectivity), 1 1 , 1 4 - 1 6 , 97,105, 148,150.184-85; cultural, 4; and gen der, 2 0 , 1 1 0 , 1 3 2 , 1 5 1 , 1 6 7 ; position, 43, 92; queer, 142, 151-53; stability
Sahlins, Marshall, 92 Said, Edward, ix, 2, 58, i n , 119 Samoa, 96 Sansom, fan, 202 Sarawak, 30-31 Schneebaum, Tobias, 152; Where the Spirits Dwell, 149-51 Sciascia, 215-16 Segalen, Victor, 96 self. See subject Sennett, Richard, 152 Serres, Michel, 112 Seth, V i k r a m , 22, 65,173; From Heaven Lake, 56-57, 59-60 sexuality, 81, 86-87, 8 9 , 1 3 1 , 1 3 4 - 5 5 . 173-74; ambiguous, 117-19,121; bisexuality, 142,174; heterosexualfty, xii, 2 1 , 1 3 3 - 3 4 , 1 4 2 , 1 4 4 , 1 9 8 ; h o m o sexuality, xii, 121, 133-55; queer, 21, 142; and voyeurism, 18 Shoumatoff, Alex, 21, 70; African Madness, 75-76 Sicily, 213-16 simulacra, 45,128,160, 162 Smolan, Richard, 122 S o l o m o n Islands, 97 Sontag, Susan. 34-35,172 South Seas, 91-99 Spender, Stephen: The Temple, 138-42 Spurr, David, viii, 4, 47 Slanley, Henry M o r i o n . 71, 7;!, 74
Taaffe, Philip, 143 Tahiti, 96 Tangier, 42-149 Tehran, 46-47 Theroux, Paul, viii, 1, 6 , 1 3 , 23, 50, 91, 92, 93, 94, 97, 98, 99, i2i, 202, 205, 206, 209-11, 213; My Other Life, 175-77 Thesiger, Wilfred, 6, 28, 29, 205 Tibet, 22, 59, 62 Time, 165 Tisdale, Sallie, 203-5, 5 , 6 T o d o r o v . Tzvetan, 19 T o k y o , 88 Torres Strait Islands. 126 tourism, viii, xiii, 8, 42, 49, 50, 62-63, 99,116,126,131,164,172,179,197, 205; post-tourism, 24, 202, 208; sex ual tourist, 148; vs. travel, viii. xi, xiii, 2-3, 8, 27-28, 31, 52,115, 124, 1 5 3 , 1 6 2 , 1 6 7 , 1 8 4 , 1 9 4 , 1 9 8 , 200-201, 203-4, 206-7, transculturation, xii, 61 transgression, x, xii, 4, 5, no, 132, 137, 173; sexual, 118,121,133,147, 151; travel as, 70,134,158 transnational space, 22,129 travel: armchair, 202, 205; political obstacles to, 59-60; technologies of, 23 24, 103, r63-64,197 travelinn t h e o r y , ix. 198
jhi 1
l6
2
2 I
o f 157-59, 7 > 174-77, ! 9 , ° ; traveling, 151,167, 202, 210 Sugnet, Charles, 4-5, 46 Suleri, Sara, 20, 43; Meatless Days, 128-32 Swift, Johnathan, vii
2 I
2 1 1
IN
mix
2 I
travelogue, 1 5 1 , 1 5 3 , 1 7 7 , 1 8 2 , 200, 208 travel writers, viii, 5-7, 9 , 1 1 - 1 3 , 54- 67. 94,144, 216; economic status of, 3 i - 3 , 4i, 6 3 , 1 0 9 , 1 2 8 , 1 3 3 , 1 5 4 , 1 7 8 , 210; gender of, 93, i n , 133-34, 5 > 197, 9 9 ; subjectivity of, 16-18, 27, 167, 183 travel writing, 148, 177, 193, 206; and academics, viii, 2, 20,131; and com edy, 16-17; conditions of production, 31, 109; dissimulation in, xi, xiii, 9, 12-13, 36-37,109, 204; and escapism, xiii, 38, 49, 90, 116,124,126,128, 168, 194; estrangement in, viii, xiii, 3,14, 18, 48, 65, n o , 166, 217; and gender, xii, 20-21,117; as genre, vii, x - x i , 8-12,16, 24, 46, 49-50, 52, 54, 64-65, 69, 77, 86, 90, 109, 116, 122, 123, 125, 132, 143,144, 157, 171, 182-83, 187, 190,191,199, 205, 206, 216-17; as interference, ix, 3, n ; nature writing, 179,184-88,191,194-95; reception in/of, vii-viii, ix, 1, 3,12, 45, 49-50, 52, 64-65, n o , 1 1 7 , 1 2 5 , 1 2 8 , 1 3 1 , 132, 134. 136,138, 143, 1 5 0 - 5 1 , 1 5 7 - 5 9 . 1 6 4 . 1 6 5 , 1 6 6 , 1 7 5 , 1 8 5 , 1 8 7 , 188, 189-90,192-93,195,198,199, 203-6, 213, 214, 216, 217; resistance in, 53 55, 64-65; self-consciousness in, 5-8, 16, 62, 71, 79, 124, 131,155,180, 195.199 2
l
l
Veblen, Thorstein, 40 Vintage Departures series, 1 Virago Press, 20 virtual reality, 96 virtual travel, xii, 2, 24, 163-64,177,
:
Trinidad, 43 Tuin, 124-26 T w a i n , M a r k , 205 Tylor, Edward, 181
179,198 voyeurism, 18-20, 38, 79, 81,122-23; cultural, 127-28,192-93 Wallace, Alfred, 79, 187 Wallerstein, Immanuel, 199 Watt, Tan, 10 W a u g h , Evelyn, 1, 8, 27-28, 32, 35,197, 199. 203, 217 Welch, Denton: Maiden Voyage, 134-36 Wheeler, Sara, 132 Wheeler, Valerie, n White, Edmund, 154: States of Desire: Travels in Gay America, 151-53 White, Hayden, 10 White, Patrick: Flaws in the Glass, 153-54 Wiebe, Rudy: Playing Dead, 100109 Wills, D a v i d , 74-75 Wilson, Alexander, 194 women's travel writing, 20-21, i n 32 women travelers, 131,198; status of, 115: vulnerability of, 113, 116 W o o d c o c k , George, 95, 97, 99 Wright, R o n a l d , 92 Xinjiang, 59
\ Uganda, 76 "Ultima T h u l e " (Arctic), 109-10 .United States of America, 61-64, 85, 151-53,161-63, 191-94 Van der Post, Laurens, 185,186, 190-91; The Lost World of the Kala hari, 179-84 Varawa, Joana Mclntyre: Changes in Latitude, 124 28
INIM
Y a n o m a m i Indians (Brazil), 18, 79-80, 208 Y o u n g s , Tim, 4 Zaire. See Democratic Republic of Congo zones, 67-68, 76, 78, 80. 81-83, 85, 86, 88-91, 93-94, 98-99,106, n o , 177, 187; exotic, 198, 204; mythicized, 183
T o u r i s t s w i t h T y p e w r i t e r s offers a s e r i e s of c h a l l e n g i n g a n d p r o v o c a t i v e c r i t i c a l i n s i g h t s into a w i d e r a n g e of t r a v e l n a r r a t i v e s w r i t t e n i n E n g l i s h a f t e r t h e S e c o n d W o r l d War.
T h e b o o k f o c u s e s o n c o n t e m p o r a r y w r i t e r s a n d t h e r e a s o n s for t r a v e l w r i t i n g ' s
enduring popularity. The book g a u g e s both the best and w o r s t in c o n t e m p o r a r y travel w r i t i n g , c a p t u r i n g t h e e x c i t e m e n t of t h i s m o s t v o l a t i l e — a n d a t t i m e s i n f u r i a t i n g — o f liter a r y g e n r e s . It w i l l a p p e a l to g e n e r a l r e a d e r s i n t e r e s t e d i n a c l o s e r e x a m i n a t i o n o f t r a v e l w r i t i n g a n d to a c a d e m i c r e a d e r s i n d i s c i p l i n e s s u c h a s l i t e r a r y / c u l t u r a l s t u d i e s , geography, history, a n t h r o p o l o g y a n d tourism studies.
"In its thrust and scope, I think it's the most interesting study of the modern travel book to date."
- C O L I W
T H U B R O N ,
A U T H O R
O F
I
N S I B E R I A
A N D
B E H I N D
T H E
W A L L
"A goldmine of information and stimulation . . . Critical w i t h o u t becoming polemic, this articulate and well-written volume offers a w e a l t h of insightful c o m m e n t a r y on the w o r k s of a n u m b e r o f c o n t e m p o r a r y t r a v e l w r i t e r s — a m o n g t h e m , V.S.
Naipaul, B a r r y Lopez,
J a n M o r r i s , Paul Theroux—and suggests a n u m b e r of a v e n u e s for further inquiry. H o l l a n d c o n c l u d e s w i t h a n e x c e l l e n t b i b l i o g r a p h y o f recent t r a v e l l i t e r a t u r e . A m u s t for all a c a d e m i c and public libraries."
C H O I C E
P a t r i c k H o l l a n d , A s s o c i a t e P r o f e s s o r of E n g l i s h , U n i v e r s i t y of G u e l p h , w a s b o r n i n N e w Z e a l a n d a n d e d u c a t e d i n E n g l a n d , A u s t r a l i a , a n d C a n a d a . G r a h a m H u g g a n , P r o f e s s o r of E n g l i s h , U n i v e r s i t y of M u n i c h , w a s b o r n i n H o n g K o n g a n d e d u c a t e d in E n g l a n d a n d in B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a .
Cover photo: Robyn Davidson, from Desert Places by Robyn Davidson (New York: Penguin, 1996). Photography D i l i p M e h t a o f C o n t a c t ( C o l o r i f i c , 1 9 9 6 ) , c o u r t e s y o f R o b y n D a v i d s o n a n d C o l o r i f i cP h o t o g r a p h i c L i b r a r i e s . C o v e rd e s i g nb y M a r t yS o m b e r g/ S o m b e r gD e s i g n/A n n A r b o r ,M i c h i g a n
ANN
A R B O R
ISBN II H7EDfl7Db-l
The U n i v e r s i t y of Michigan Press www
l> I'll II ri II in I n i l . m l ii
9
by