Thermal Methods in Petroleum Analysis by. Heinz Kopsch CopyrightoVCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 1995
Heinz Kopsch
Therm...
254 downloads
2006 Views
18MB Size
Report
This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form
Thermal Methods in Petroleum Analysis by. Heinz Kopsch CopyrightoVCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 1995
Heinz Kopsch
Thermal Methods in Petroleum Analysis
0VCH VerlagsgesellschaftmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 1995 Distribution: VCH, PO. Box 10 1161, D-69451 Weinheim,Federal Republic of Germany Switzerland:VCH, PO. Box, CH-4020 Basel, Switzerland United Kingdom and Ireland: VCH, 8 Wellington Court, Cambridge CB1 lHZ, United Kingdom USA and Canada: VCH, 220 East 23rd Street, New York, NY 10010-4606,USA Japan: VCH, E k o w Building, 10-9 Hongo 1-chome,Bunkyo-ku,Tokyo 113,Japan ISBN 3-527-28740-X
Heinz Kopsch
Thermal Methods in Petroleum Analysis
4b
VCH
Weinheim . New York . Base1 - Cambridge - Tokyo
Dr. rer. nat. Heinz Kopsch Institut fur Technische Chemie T.U. Clausthal ErzstraBe 18 D-38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld Germany
This book was carefully produced. Nevertheless, the author and publisher do not warrant the information contained therein to be free of errors. Readers are advised to keep in mind that statements, data, illustrations,procedural details or other items may inadvertently be inaccurate.
Published jointly by VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Weinheim (Federal Republic of Germany) VCH Publishers, Inc., New York, NY (USA)
Editorial Director: Dr. Barbara Bijck Production Manager: Peter J. Biel The cover photo shows a view of part of the BASF steamcracker in Antwerp. (Courtesy of BASF Aktiengesellschaft Ludwigshafen,Germany)
Library of Congress Card No. applied for British Library Cataloguing-in-PublicationData: A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Die Deutsche Bibliothek - CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Kopsch, He& Thermal methods in petroleum analysis / Heinz Kopsch. Weinheim ; New York ; Base1 ; Cambridge ;Tokyo : VCH, 1995 ISBN 3-527-28740-X
0VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, D-69451 Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 1995 Printed on acid-free and low-chlorine paper All rights reserved (including those of translation into other languages). No part of this book may be reproduced in any form - by photoprinting, microfilm, or any other means - nor transmitted or translated into a machine language without written permission from the publishers. Registered names, trademarks, etc. used in this book, even when not specifically marked as such, are not to be considered unprotected by law. Composition:Graph. Werkstatten Lehne GmbH, D-41516 Grevenbroich Printing and Bookbinding: Paderborner Druck Centrum. D-33100 Paderborn Printed in the Federal Republic of Germany
Preface
The monograph Thermal Methods in Petroleum Analysis is based mainly on results of more than twelve years research work on the application of thermoanalytical methods to petroleum and its products during the activities of the author at the German Institute for Petroleum Research. It was very interesting to research the application of well defined physical methods, such as thermogravimetry and differential scanning calorimetry, to the multicomponent systems of petroleum and its products, and to understand the limits of those methods on the one hand and the excellent transferability of the results to technical processes on the other. The diversity of possible applications of thermoanalytical methods to various problems in the petroleum laboratory can only be indicated in this monograph. Many people supported my work, either by active or by indirect help. Thanks are expressed to Mrs. Elvira Falkenhagen, who has been a skilful and reliable assistant for many years, as well as to Dr.-Ing. Maria Nagel, Dr.-Ing. Ulrike Tietz, Mrs. Liliane Varoscic, Mrs. Regina Bosse, Mrs. Gerda Sopalla, and the late Mrs. Heidi Gottschalck. An acknowledgement should be made to the directors of the German Institute for Petroleum Research: Professor Dr. H. H. Oelert, Professor Dr. H.-J. Neumann, and Professor Dr. D. Kessel who granted me maximum independent research capacity. Some parts of the research work were carried out with financial support from the German Association for Research CD (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft). For several years successful and pleasant cooperation was established with colleagues of the University of Belgrade, especially with Professor Dr. D. Skala, Professor Dr. M. Sokic, and Professor Dr. J. A. Jovanovic. Thanks are also expressed to those whose names do not appear in this list. All the companies which supplied me with information as well as with illustrations are likewise acknowledged; their names may be found in the appendix. I hope that this monograph will be of some help to colleagues in both academic and industrial research establishments and will encourage them towards further attempts in the application of thermal methods of analysis, even to chemically non-defined multicomponent systems. The examples presented might represent a stimulation for further experimental work. Heinz Kopsch Oktober 1995
Contents
1
1
Introduction
2
Methods and instrumentation 3
3 3.1 3.1.1 3.1.2 3.1.3 3.1.4 3.1.5 3.2 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.3 3.3.1 3.3.1.1 3.3.1.2 3.3.1.3 3.3.1.4 3.3.2 3.3.2.1
3.3.2.2 3.3.3 3.3.4 3.3.5 3.3.6
Thermal analysis on model substances 15 Thermogravimetry (TGA) 15 Thermogravimetry in an inert atmosphere 15 Simulated distillation 28 Thermogravimetry in an oxidizing atmosphere 38 Isothermal thermogravimetry 45 Experiments using the simultaneous thermal analyzer 47 Differential scanning calorimetry on model substances 54 DSC in an inert atmosphere 54 DSC in an oxidizing atmosphere 63 Reaction kinetics 68 Theoretical basis 68 Method according to ASTM E 698-79 69 Method according to Borchardt and Daniels 70 Method according to Flynn and Wall 72 Method according to McCarthy and Green 74 Kinetic investigations on model substances 75 DSC experiments according to ASTM E 698-79 heat of vaporization of n-alkanes 75 Pyrolysis kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79 82 DSC oxidation kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79 84 Kinetics according to Borchardt and Daniels 89 TGA kinetics according to Flynn and Wall 90 TGA kinetics according to McCarty and Green 94
4 4.1 4.2 4.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.2.1
Thermoanalytical investigations on petroleum und petroleumproducts 97 Crude oils (degasified crudes) 99 Refinery residues 111 Description and characterization of the samples 112 Implementation and evaluation of tests 118 Deviations in thermogravimetry 119
VIII
Contents
Thermogravimetry in an inert atmosphere 123 Directly measured index numbers 131 Derived index numbers 136 Simulated distillation 137 Directly measured index numbers in comparison with the simulated distillation 143 4.2.3.5 Derived index numbers for pracital application 144 4.2.4 Thermogravimetry in air 147 4.2.4.1 Directly measured index numbers 155 4.2.5 Correlations of analytical data with index numbers from thermogravimetry 160 4.2.6 Simulated thermal cracking by TGA 162 4.2.6.1 Index numbers from simulated cracking 164 4.2.6.2 Correlation of index numbers from simulated cracking with analytical data 165 4.2.7 Start temperature of the cracking process in an inert atmosphere 166 4.2.8 Differental scanning calorimetry (DSC) 167 4.2.8.1 Experiments in argon at atmospheric pressure 167 4.2.8.2 Experiments in methane at 10 bar pressure 171 4.2.8.2.1 Reaction enthalpy from tests at 10 bar pressure 174 4.2.8.3 Start temperatures of the cracking process at different pressures 175 4.2.8.4 Correlation of kinetic parameters with analytical data 176 4.2.9 Conclusions from experiments on refinery residues 181 4.2.9.1 Thermogravimetry 181 4.2.9.2 Reaction kinetics 184 4.2.9.3 Correlation of data from thermoanalysis with analytical data 186 4.3 Investigations on bitumen 187 4.3.1 Description and characterization of the samples 189 4.3.2 Thermoanalytical investigations 195 4.3.2.1 Thermogravirnetry in inert gas 195 4.3.2.1.1 Correlation of index number from thermogravimetry with consistency data 202 4.3.2.1.2 Correlation index numbers with analysis data 21 1 4.3.2.2 Thermogravimetry in air 217 4.3.3 Isothermal aging tests by thermogravimetry 225 4.3.4 Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) 233 4.3.4.1 Test in argon at atmospheric pressure 233 4.3.4.2 Tests in methane at 10 bar pressure 237 4.3.4.3 Tempratures of the cracking process 243 4.3.4.4 Oxidation in air 247 4.3.5 Low temperature behavior of bitumen 258 4.3.6 Conclusions from experiments on bitumen 258 4.3.6.1 Thermogravimetry 258 4.3.6.2 Reaction kinetics 261 4.2.3 4.2.3.1 4.2.3.2 4.2.3.3 4.2.3.4
Contents
IX
Investigations on polymer modified bitumens (PMB) 265 Description and characterization of the samples 265 Thermogravimetry 269 Dynamic (temperature-programed) thermogravimetry 269 Isothermal gravimetq 275 Reaction kinetics using DSC 283 Low temperature behaviour of PMB using DSC 285 Aging properties of polymers for the modification of bitumen 287 Investigation on the hydrocracking reaction of heavy residues 296 Investigation on a vacuum residue from Kirkuk 297 Investigation on residues of different origins 304 Oil shale and shale oil 321 Investigation using TGA and DSC 322 Modelling and simulation of oil shale pyrolysis 331 Fingerprinting of oil shale by oxidation 345 Lubricants 348 Evaporation behavior of lubrication oils 349 Oxidation behavior of lubrication oils 358 Comparison of the oxidation stability of virgin oils, reclaimed oils, and synthetic lubrication oils 365 4.8 Silicone oils 376 4.9 Relation of the kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions to the system pressure: Investigations on tertiary oil recovery by in situ combustion 400 4.9.1 Pyrolysis tests 405 4.9.2 Oxidation tests 410 4.9.2.1 Range of low temperature oxidation (LTO) 412 4.9.2.2 Range of fuel deposition 415 4.9.2.3 Range of fuel combustion 421 4.9.3 Discussion 424 4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs for investigation of kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions of heavy petroleum products 427 4.10.1 Pyrolysis reaction 429 4.10.1.1 Kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79 429 4.10.1.1.1 DSC (DTA) experiments 429 4.10.1.1.2 Kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79 from simultaneous TGA/DTA experiments 439 4.10.1.2 Kinetics according to Borchardt and Daniels 440 4.10.1.3 Kinetics according to Flynn and Wall 442 4.10.1.4 Kinetics according to McCarty and Green 453 4.10.2 Oxidation reaction 458 4.10.2.1 Kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79 460 4.10.2.1.1 DSC (DTA) experiments 460 4.10.2.1.2 Experiments using Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer 467 4.10.2.2 Kinetics according to Borchardt and Daniels 468
4.4 4.4.1 4.4.2 4.4.2.1 4.4.2.2 4.4.3 4.4.4 4.4.5 4.5 4.5.1 4.5.2 4.6 4.6.1 4.6.2 4.6.3 4.7 4.7.1 4.7.2 4.7.3
X
Contents
4.10.2.3 Kinetics according to Flynn and Wall 469 4.10.2.4 Kinetics according to McCarty and Green 473 4.10.3 Conclusions 477
5 5.1 5.2
Final consideration 485 Other applications 485 Summary on progress of instrumentation (hard and software) and advice 487
6
Appendix: Manufacturers of thermoanalytical instrumention 495
References 499 References Chapter 1 References Chapter 2 References Chapter 3 References Chapter 4 References Chapter 5
499 500 500 502 506
List of Symbols
A AR ASTM
Frequency or Pre-exponential Factor (min ') Atmospheric residue American Society for Testing and Materials
BP
Boiling Point ("C)
CCR CR
Conradson Carbon Residue (%) Crackable part of the sample (%)
DDK DIN
Dynamic Difference Calorimetry (see DSC) Deutsches Institut k r Normung e. V. (German Institute for Standardization) Differential Scanning Calorimetry Differential Thermal Analysis Differential Thermogravimetry (First differential quotient of weight loss with respect to time) (% min ')
DSC DTA DTG
Activation Energy (J . Mol-l) Base of natural logarithm Exponent with base e Residual weight at the point of inflexion of the TGA curve (%) Energy flow (pW) Enthalpy of pyrolysis (J . g-1) Heat of fusion (J . g-1) Heat of vaporization (J . g-1) Infrared Spectroscopy Reaction (Rate) Constant (min-') Natural logarithm Decimal logarithm Mean relative particle mass (Mean molecular weight) Melting Point ("C) Non-distillable part of the sample (%) Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Reaction order (dimensionless)
XI1
List of Symbols
P PCR Pen PMB
Pressure (bar) Practical thermal crackable part of the sample (%) Needle penetration at 25 "C (0.1 mmj Polymer modified Bitumen
Q
Quotient of weight loss in air divided by weight loss in inert gas (Isothermal Gravimetry) Universal Gas Constant (J Mol-' K-') Residue (%) at 600 "C experimental temperature Residue (%) at 800 "C experimental temperature Coefficient of correlation (dimensionless)
R R600 R800 r
SAR Simulated atmospheric residue (%) S.P.R&B Softening Point Ring and Ball ("C) Simultaneous Thermal Analysis (or Analyzer) STA (TGA+DTA or TGA+DSC) Simulated vacuum residue (%) SVR Standard deviation S
512
Temperature (Generally OC, except kinetics with absolute temperature K) Thermal Analysis Start temperature of the thermal crack reaction ("C) Thermogravimetry Temperature of peak maximum ("C) Onset temperature ("C) Temperature of the point of inflexion of the TGA curve ("C) Temperature ("C) at 1 % weight loss Temperature ("C) at 5 % weight loss Time (min) Half life time (minj
U
Conversion (%)
V VR VVR
Coefficient of variation (%j Vacuum residue Visbreaker residue
x
Arithmetic mean
01
Fractional conversion (dimensionless) Heating rate (K min-') Solubility parameter according to Hildebrandt ( ~ M m-3) J Difference Weight loss up to 100 "C (%) Weight loss up to 200 "C (%) Weight loss up to 300 "C (%) Weight loss up to 400 "C (%)
T TA Tcrack TGA Tm Tonset Tw T1 % T5 % t
P
6
A AGlOO AG200 AG300 AG400
Thermal Methods in Petroleum Analysis by. Heinz Kopsch CopyrightoVCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 1995
1 Introduction
Analytical methods describing the thermal behavior of substances during programmed temperature changes, like thermogravimetry, differential thermoanalysis, or differential scanning calorimetry are old methods, which were applied at first to problems of inorganic chemistry, mainly to minerals. The analysis of petroleum and petroleum products has been mentioned relatively late. In the literature survey by Weselowski [ 1-11 the first citation dates from 1958. Also, the oldest citation in the research report by Kettrup and Ohrbach [1-21 dates from 1965. Petroleum, especially heavy crudes, is recovered sometimes by the use of thermal processes like steam flooding or by in situ combustion. The processing of the recovered crudes in the refineries is usually done by thermal methods at very different temperatures. A review of the temperatures applied in refinery operations is given in Table 1-1. These thermal processes are performed partly by sequential heating until the desired products are obtained. The operating parameters for the different processes have been obtained to a large extent by empirical experience or partly by simulation of the processes in laboratory installations or in pilot plants. For that reason thermoanalytical methods are considered to be very useful in obtaining data concerning the thermal behavior i. e. data describing the Table 1-1: Temperature Ranges in Petroleum Processing Process Atmospheric Distillation Vacuum Distillation Thermal Cracking Catalytic Cracking Steam Cracking High Temperature Pyrolysis Hydrocracking (Gas Phase) Hydrocracking (Liquid Phase) Visbreaking Reforming (Thermal Treating) Reforming (Catalytic Treating) Isomerization Alkylation (Catalytic) Polymerization Hydrotreating Steam Reforming Bitumen Blowing
Temperature Range ("C)
350 . . . 380 350 . . . 380 400 . . . 650 450 . . . 540 650 . . . 1000 1000 340 . . . 430 340 . . . 470 460 . . . 480 510 . . . 580 500 . . . 550 60 . . . 200 0 . . . 200 170 . . . 215 250 . . . 430 700 . . . 800 230 . . . 300
2
1 Introduction
thermal and oxidation stability of petroleum and its products; data predicting the manner and quantity of products gained in the processes; and data concerning reaction kinetics which can be used to optimize the refinery processes. Thermogravimetry (TGA), differential thermoanalysis (DTA), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) are the main methods which can be used in the analysis of petroleum and its products. DSC is preferred to DTA, because DSC supplies values of energies directly, whereas the DTA supplies only temperature differences. These thermal methods of analysis have been described in several basic books [l-3 to 1-17]. The application to polymers is described likewise [l-18, 1-19]. So far no compilation on the application to petroleum and its products exists. The situation in the field of standards is similar. The NormenausschuB Materialpriifung im Deutschen Institut fur Normung (Committee for Testing and Materials of the German Institute for Standardization e. V., DIN) has approved only two standards (one of them contains terms of thermal analysis [ 1-20], the other is the standard for thermogravimetry [l-211). Furthermore there are three proposals (principles of differential thermal analysis [1-22], determination of melting temperatures of crystalline material by DTA [l-231, and testing of plastics and elastomers by DSC [ 1-24]). The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) has to date approved forty standards for the application of thermal methods of analysis. Among them, seven standards are concerned with the testing of petroleum and its products [l-251 to [l-321, six standards are general methods [l-321 to [l-381, and four standards concerning the testings of polymers are applicable to petroleum and its products too [l-391 to 11-42].
Thermal Methods in Petroleum Analysis by. Heinz Kopsch CopyrightoVCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 1995
2 Methods and instrumentation
Using thermogravimetry (TGA), the dependence of the change in sample weight (mass) on the temperature during programmed temperature changes in a chosen gas atmosphere can be measured. The first derivative of the weight (mass) signal with respect to time is called derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) and is a criterion for the reaction rate. It is usual to record both the slope of the weight (mass) versus the time or temperature (TGA), and the differentiatoed curve versus the time or temperature (DTG). The heating rate dictates the actual position of the TGA and DTG graphs; it is therefore advisable always to use the same heating rate ( p ) so that different tests may be compared. For small sample weights (masses), up to approximately 10 rng, a standard heating rate of 10 K/min is practicable. This heating rate is slow enough to avoid any temperature gradient inside the sample while permitting a reasonable utilization of the available workmg time. The shift to higher temperatures of the TGA and DTG curves as a consequence of faster heating rates permits calculation of the Arrhenius kinetic parameters and hence investigation of the reaction kinetics (see chapter 3.3). Furthermore, the position of the TGA and DTG curves will be influenced by the shape of the sample pan, especially by the ratio of surface to volume of the sample, and lastly by the quantity of gas flowing through the oven (gas flow rate). Therefore it is important that variations in sample quantity are minimized and that the gas flow rate is maintained as constant as possible. However, the gas flow rate must not fall below a certain minimum value in order to avoid condensation of evaporated sample fractions on the hangdown of the sample holder or in the gas outlet tubes. The minimum gas flow rate depends on the geometric shape of the oven and the position of the gas inlet and outlet tubes and therefore differs for different instruments. If the gas flow rate is sufficient, the evaporated portions of the sample will be discharged immediately and therefore no equilibrium between liquid and vapor will be attained. As a consequence the boiling (evaporation)temperature of the sample will decrease adequately.That can be used to perform a simulated distillation (see chapter 3.1.2). However, the application of thermoanalytic methods is limited to substances having a start temperature of evaporation at atmospheric pressure not far below 200 "C.Otherwise there is the risk that evaporation in the gas flow will begin at room temperature and thus the correct start temperature of evaporation (zero point of the TGA curve) cannot be ascertained. In principle all except very corrosive gases can be passed through a thermobalance; in practice the inert gases nitrogen, helium, and argon and the reactive gases air, oxygen, and hydrogen will be used. The weight calibration of thermobalances is done using standard weights. The temperature calibration is more difficult. The method using the Curie point temperature, as
4
2 Methods and Instrumentation
described in ASTM E 914-83, does not work if a magnetic field from outside the oven is prevented from reciprocal action with the standard inside the oven, by the construction or the material of the oven. Calibration using calcium oxalate monohydrate for standard is very common, since it has exhibited three clearly-defined steps of weight loss during heating (Fig. 2-1 to 2-3).: Reaction
CaC,O,.H,O CaC,04 CaCO,
-+ CaC,04 + H,O + CaCO, + C o t
t
CaO+CO,T
Temperature Range at p = 10 K/min ("C) 135.. . 175 4 6 3 . . ,502 660. . .740
Residue
DTG Maximum Temperature
(%I
("C) 163 49 1 722
87.7 68.5 38.4
As can be seen from the figures, the DTG maximum is found at conversions which are smaller than the maximum conversion of the reaction step concerned. The onset temperatures as well as the DTG maximum temperatures can be reproduced with coefficients of variation < 2 % of the corresponding mean value. The thermogravimetric experiments are run using open platinum sample pans. Pans made from aluminium, platinum, quartz, glass, stainless steel etc. were also available. The 5
110
0
I00
-5 90
-10
U
:m: 0
no
>
U
L
-15
PI
a
r(
x
l l N T TABLE TGA
70
-20 60
-25 50
-30 TGA
-35
40 __.
100
too
300
I
500
4bO Deg
Fig. 2-1: Thermogravimetry of CaC,O,. H,O Plot of STA 780: TGA and DTA Atmosphere: Argon 30 + 20 cm3/min Heating Rate p: 10 K/min
c
I
600
I
700
I
800
<
5
2 Methods and Instrumentation 110
-
100
-
90
-
80
-
U
c m
-a
.
>
0
k
L
m
a 70
-
60
-
50
-
.3-
4
0
.2-
4l
m .,
.i0.0
-
-.l
40
L.--y.r 0
100
200
-
--
----.
300
400
600
500
800
700
-.2
-
9 900
Deg C
Fig. 2-2: Thermogravimetry of CaC,O,. H,O Plot of STA 780: TGA and DTG Atmosphere: Argon 30 + 20 cm3 Heating Rate p: 10 K/min/min 110
-
100
-
90
-
80
-
70
-
60
-
50
-
40
-
U
;
136.13
c
171.08 C
463.21 C
0
L
m
a
0
601.36
100
200
I
300
1
400
I
500
C
661.26 C
600
I
700
800
I0
6
2 Methods and Instrumentation
catalytic effect of the pan material on the pyrolysis reaction could not be ascertained when comparing the reaction in platinum and quartz pans, however, it could not be completely excluded. All thermogravimetric experiments carried out by the author were run in platinum pans. Argon was used as the inert atmosphere. Oxidation experiments were run in air because the reactions are too fast in oxygen. The first stage of experiments was carried out using a Stanton-Redcroft TG 750 thermobalance connected to a three-pen recorder, recording weight (mass) loss (TGA), derivative thermogravimetry (DTG), and temperature (q. For documentation the graphs of weight (mass) versus temperature were drawn manually. Later on, the experiments were performed using a simultaneous thermal analyzer Stanton-Redcroft STA 780 (STA 1 000), which is equipped with a personal computer for control, data sampling, and data evaluation (Table 2-1). Using this device the curves of TGA, DTG, and DTA (differential thermal analysis) versus temperature can be plotted. Furthermore, the PC is equipped with extensive software to evaluate the results under varying conditions. Table 2-1: Thermobalances Instrument: System: Pressure Range: Heating Rates: Recording: Evaluation:
TG 750 Stanton-Redcroft TGA + DTG up to 1000°C normal pressure and vacuum 0.5 . . . 100 K/min 3 pen recorder manually TGA empirical index numbers evaporation pyrolysis oxidation simulated distillation DTG empirical index numbers kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79
Instrument: System: Pressure Range Heating Rates: Recording: Evaluation:
STA 780 Stanton-Redcroft (STA 1000) TGA + DTG + DTA simultaneous up to 1000°C normal pressure and vacuum 0.5 . 50 K/min PC PC TGA empirical index numbers evaporation pyrolysis oxidation simulated distillation kinetics according to Flynn & Wall kinetics according to McCarty & Green DTG empirical index numbers kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79 DTA specific heat conversion temperatures kinetics according to Borchardt & Daniels kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79
2 Methods and Instrumentation
7
6‘
-5
i
1-
i
i
2a-
I t4
2-
1
312-
GA S ..tN
WALE! IN
B-‘
-7
-13 9-
WATER OUT
10-
\ FURNACE LIFTING SYSTEM’
11
Fig. 2-4: Diagram of the Thermobalance Stanton-Redcroft TG 750 1 Balance glass housing 8 Cooling water flow meter 9 Furnace 2 Glass protection tube 2a Brackets 10 Furnace lifting system 3 Glass protection tube 11 Spirit level 4 Counter weight glass housing 12 Support for glass protection tube 5 Gas inlet 13 Lower cover 6 Protection lid (Figure by Stanton-Redcroft Ltd.) 7 Gas flow meter
8
2 Methods and Instrumentation
A schematic digaram of the TG 750 is shown in Fig. 2-4, of the STA 780 in Fig. 2-5. The recorder script of an experiment with a hydrocarbon using the TG 750 is depicted schematically in Fig. 2-6. Curve I represents the weight (mass) signal (TGA), curve I1 that of the first derivative (DTG), and curve I11 the temperature (T> of the thermocouple directly below the sample pan. Point A marks the start of the weight (mass) loss 1 % and the corresponding temperature T1 %; point B is the weight (mass) loss 5 % and the corresponding temperature T5 %. Point C corresponds to the weight (mass) loss at 400°C (AG400). This is the temperature limit of the thermal stability of most non-aromatic hydrocarbons and of the heterocompounds. Point D marks the weight (mass) of the coked residue at 600 "C (R600) or at 800 "C (R800). Point E represents the maximum of the DTG curve
Fig. 2-5: Cross-Section of Water-cooled Furnance for STA 1 000 (STA780) A Water cooled cold finger B Ceranuc baffles C Ceramic tube D Micro-enviromental cup E Ceramic stem gas inlet F Furnace winding G STA hangdown assembly (Figure by Rheometnc Scientific, Polymer Laboratories GmbH)
2 Methods and Instrumentation
E
9
D
Fig. 2-6: Schematic Diagram of Recorder Diagram of a Test in Protecting Gas by means of TG 750. I TGA signal II DTG signal I11 Temperature signal A Start of weight loss (T1 %) B Start of weight loss (T5 %) C Weight loss up to 400 "C (AG400) Residue at 600 "C (R600) or at 800 "C (R800) D E Maximum of DTG curve (T-)
with the corresponding temperature T-. The amplitude of the DTG curve corresponds to the reaction rate. The temperature of the DTG maximum shows whether the reaction remains in the evaporation (distillation) range (Tmx< 400 "C) or if a pyrolysis (cracking) reaction has occurred (T- > 400 "C). An example of rescaling the plot of weight versus time to weight versus temperature is shown in Fig. 2-7. Here, the point of intersection of the tangents (offset point) represents the weight (mass) Gw of generated coke at the temperature Tw at the point of inflexion of the TGA curve. This happens only during experiments in inert gas. Using ash-free substances in experiments in air, a TGA curve passing through zero weight is obtained, while ash-containing substances give a constant residual weight. The DTG graph of the experiment in air always shows more than one maximum, the first of which can represent vaporization as well as oxidation. In this case the TGA graph in protecting gas must be consulted for comparison. Figs. 2-1 to 2-3 demonstrate possible evaluations using the STA 780 in an experiment with calcium oxalate monohydrate. In Fig. 2-1 the TGA curve is evaluated with respect to the weight (mass) losses of 1 %, 5 %, 10 %, and further in 10 % steps, whereas in the DTA curve the peak maximum temperature and the corresponding residual weight (mass) are plotted. Fig. 2-2 again shows the TGA and DTG curves with peak maximum temperatures and corresponding residual weights. Fig. 2-3 demonstrates the onset and offset temperatu-
10
2 Methods and Instrumentation Residue ( % I
100..
80
60.
LO
- - - - - - -9___
(c-
z
20.
I
I I Tw I *
100
300
1 500
7M
800
-
res of the three reaction steps. Theoretically all three evaluations could be drawn in one plot, but that would be very difficult to interpret. With the help of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), events can be observed which are created by energy transfer (take up or delivery) during programmed heating or cooling of a sample, i.e. melting, crystallization, second order transitions, evaporation, pyrolysis, oxidation etc. The energetic effect in the sample is compared to a thermally inert reference substance which undergoes the same temperature programme. The differences between sample and reference in uptake or delivery of energy will be recorded as energy flows versus temperature or time. Using DSC it is likweise possible to differentiatethe resulting data with respect to time (dimensions W/s) or to temperature (dimensionsW/O C). Neither differential quotient has any meaning in the physical sense. They serve only to elucidate effects of the graph of energy flows versus temperature or time. Therefore it is not surprising, that only a very few literature references exist where differentiated curves are described. Using DSC, the position of the energy flows versus temperature curve as well as the rate of an event were influeced by the heating rate, too. Therefore the DSC tests were run likewise, using a standard heating rate p= 10 K/min with the exception of the investiga-
2 Methods and Instrumentation
11
tion of reaction kinetics. There the shift of the maxima of the energy flow curve to higher temperatures as a result of increasing heating rates permits the calculation of the Arrhenius lanetic parameters (see Chapter 3.3). All the influences, such as oven geometry, shape of the sample pan, position of gas inlet and gas outlet, on the results of DSC are the same as in TGA. The gas purge with a minimum flow rate is also necessary in DSC to avoid condensations,when petroleum and its products or generally volatile substances are tested. As a consequence, the boiling (evaporation) temperature will decrease in a similar way to that in TGA. The gases used in TGA can be used also in DSC. Some additional experiments have been carried out in methane to study the influence of a hydrocarbon atmosphere. For calibration, the melting point of indium were measured, which has a temperature of fusion (MP) = 156.4"C and a heat of fusion Hf= 28.46 J/g (Fig. 2-8). Because reactions at higher temperatures occur in experiments with petroleum refinery residues, additional calibration runs were performed using pewter (MP = 231.84"C, H,= 59.61 J/g) and lead (MP = 327.40°C, Hf= 26.47 J/g). If a calibration at higher temperatures is necessary, potassium perrhenate KReO, (MP = 550°C, H,= 294.8 J/g) can be used. All DSC tests carried out by the author were run using open aluminium pans. For reference an empty pan were used. Comparative tests with platinum pans gave no indica-
0
Temperature CoC)
Fig. 2-8: Indium Calibration Curve of DSC MP : 156.4 "C Hf : 28.46 J/g
12
2 Methods and Instrumentation
tion that the pan material had any influence, neither for pyrolysis nor for oxidation reactions. The first experiments were carried out with the help of a DuPont 990 Thermoanalysis System connected to a 910 DSC.This system used a two pen x-y recorder; the resultant graphs were evaluated manually. Later, a DuPont 9900 Thermoanalysis System was used, which is equipped with a PC for control, data sampling, and data evaluation (Table 2-2). A cross-section of the DSC cell is shown in Fig. 2-9.
Table 2-2: Differential Scanning Calorimetry Instrument: System: Heating Rates: Cooling Rates: Recording: Evaluation:
Fig. 2-9: DSC Cell Cross-Section 1 Gas purge inlet 2 Lid 3 Reference pan 4 Silver ring 5 Furnace winding 6 Furnace block 7 Radiation shield 8 Sample platform
DuPont 9900 Thermal Analysis System DuPont 910 DSC Pressure DSC Cell DSC -75 "C . . . +250 "C, normal pressure DSC RT . . . +650 "C vacuum till bar pressure up to 70 bar 0.5 . . . 50K/min 0.5 . . . 5K/min PC PC specific heat conversion temperatures reaction enthalpy heat of conversions kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79
9 Chromel disk 10 Chromel wire 11 Alumel wire 12 Thermocouple junction 13 Thermoelectric disk (Constantan) 14 Samplepan 15 Lid (Figure by TA Instruments Inc.)
2 Methods and Instrumentation
13
Petroleum and its products are multicomponent systems of varying chemical composition. They are predominantly a mixture of hydrocarbons, usually accompanied by a small quantity of heterocompounds which contain in addition to carbon (C) and hydrogen (H) other atoms such as sulfur (S), nitrogen (N), and/or oxygen (0).Metals are present in very small concentrations, such as vanadium and nickel in organically bound forms. The average elementary composition of petroleum in weight-% lies between the following limits [2-11: C 8 3 . . . 87% H11 . . . 14% S 0.01.. . 8 %
0 0 . . .2 % N 0.01 . . . 1.7 % Metals 0 . . . 0.1 %
Petroleum contains four groups of hydrocarbons:
- alkanes (unbranched n- and branched i-alkanes) - cycloalkanes (naphthenes, unsubstituted and substituted) - aromatics (unsubstituted and substituted)
- complex hydrocarbons (naphthenoaromatics) Alkenes (olefins) and alkynes (acetylenes) are not found in petroleum (crude oils). However, they were formed during the processing of petroleum at high temperatures. With regard to the boiling behavior, the full range of substances occur, from those which evaporate early during the recovery, as a result of pressure decrease, through to substances which cannot evaporate without decomposition. It is possible to separate individual cherncally-defined substances from the low boiling fractions. From medium and high boiling fractions and from the non-distillable residues only multicomponent systems can be obtained, which can be separated into groups characterized by a similar chemical and physical behavior. Separation into individual compounds is almost impossible. Under these circumstances, it seems reasonable to study the thermal reactions such as boiling, pyrolysis, and the oxidation behavior of defined model substances first, in order to understand the behavior of petroleum and its main products and to draw some analogous conclusions.
Thermal Methods in Petroleum Analysis by. Heinz Kopsch CopyrightoVCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 1995
3 Thermal analysis on model substances
3.1 Thermogravimetry (TGA) 3.1.1 Thermogravimetry in an inert atmosphere The series of n-alkanes from n-decane up to n-hexacontane (Table 3-1) and some chemicals mentioned in ASTM D 2887-84 (Table 3-2) were used for modelling purposes. Table 3-1: Boiling Points of n-Alkanes DIN 51435 [3-51 Carbon Number
Boiling Point ("C)
Carbon Number
Boiling point ("C)
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
174 196 216 235 253 28 1 287 302 317 331 344 356 369 380 39 1 402 412 422 432 44 1 450 459 468 476 483 49 1
36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
499 506 513 520 527 533 540 546 552 558 564 570 575 581 586 591 597 602 607 612 616 62 1 626 630 635
16
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
Table 3-2: Substaiices according to ASTM D 2887-84 Table X 1.1 [3-61 Number
Substances
1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 27 29 30 31
Benzene Toluene p-Xylene Cumene (i-Propylbenzene) 1-Decene sec-Butylbenzene n-Buty lbenzene trans-Decalin &-Decalin 1-Dodecene Naphthalene 2,3-Dihydroindole
1,3,5-Tn-i-propylbenzene 2-Methylnaphthalene 1-Methylnaphthalene Indole Acenaphthene 1-0ctadecene Phenanthrene Anthracene Acndine Triphenylmethane Pyrene 1,3,5-Triphenylbenzene Di-p-tolylsulfone
1,1,2,2-Tetraphenylethylene Palmitic acid methyl ester
BP ("C) 80.2 110.8 138.4 152.5 168 - 170 172 - 173 183.1 187 - 188 193 213.4 218.05 225 - 221 223 - 226 241 - 242 244.6 253 - 254 277.9 314.8 322 342 345 - 346 360 394.8 460 405 415 - 420 415
These chemicals were of the highest purity commercially available. All substances were tested by thennogravimetry at a heating rate p= 10 K/min in an inert gas atmosphere (argon). To avoid condensation the gas flow rate through the TG 750 thermobalance should be 25 cm3/min. Using the STA 780, a gas purge of 30 cm3/min through the oven, and an additional gas flow of 20cm3/min through the side tube of the hangdown protecting cylinder were needed. In the STA 780, the gas flow causes complete vaporization of all the n-alkanes. The STA plot of n-hexacontane is shown in Fig. 3-1 as an example. The chemicals mentioned in Table 3-2 were also completely vaporized, with the exception of 1, 3,5-triphenylbenzene, di-p-tolylsulfone, and palmitic acid methyl ester. The latter start to decompose when about 70-80 % of the sample has been evaporated. The smaller gas flow rate in the TG 750 (25 cm3/min) causes a reduction in the mass loss rate. In consequence, a pyrolysis reaction occurs, sooner or later depending on the purity of the individual substance. Whereas pyrolysis of n-hexacontane starts above 400 "C as expected (Fig. 3-2), the start of pyrolysis of n-hexatriacontane is as low as 330 'C,an unusually low temperature for n-alkanes (Fig. 3-3). The substances which pyrolyze at relatively low temperatures in the STA 780, do the same in the TG 750: i. e. 1, 3, 5-triphenylbenzene
17
3.1 Thermogravimetry (TGA)
2.0
110 1.81
d'
+,
1.e
-
1.6-
c
m
; i.4-
-a m
>
m
a
40 -
-
1.0
-
m
.E-
50
20
1.2
+I
m
n
POINT TABLE TGA
.6
-
.414
-
.2 0.0
0 -
RESIDUE .E X
0
100
1
I
I
200
300
400
Deg
I
500
I
600
,
-.2j
700
C
Fig. 3-1: Thermogravimetry of n-Hexacontane Plot of STA 780: TGA and DTG Atmosphere: Argon, 30 + 20 cm3/min Heating Rate fi: 10 K/min
(start temperature approx. 325 "C), di-p-tolylsulfone (start temperature approx. 275 "C), and palmitic acid methyl ester (start temperature approx. 280 "C). The thermogravimetry of hydrocarbons in inert gas atmosphere can be described generally as follows: At the beginning there is an induction period, the length of which is determined by the evaporation start temperature of the sample. The induction period is followed by the evaporation. The temperature TI % of a weight (mass) loss of 1 % or of 5 % (T5 %) characterizes the initial boiling temperature. As expected, the coefficient of variation k V of the mean X is smaller for T5 % than for T1 %, if a statistical evaluation of at least ten experiments of the same sample had been carried out. The coefficients of variation T1 % and T5 % will also decrease with increasing boiling points (BP) of the samples. The ratio T5 %/T1 % also decreases with increasing boiling point of the sample and attains a constant final value of T5 %/T1 % = 1.143 for boling points above 500 "C (Fig. 3-4). However, a boiling temperature above 500 "C is an extrapolated value because no organic substance can be distilled at such temperatures without undergoing decomposition. For example BP = 500 "C corresponds to the boiling point of n-hexatriacontane at atmospheric pressure. With increasing temperature the slope of the TGA curve becomes steeper and passes through the final weight value zero, unless another chemical reaction occurs in the sample sooner. Samples which disproportionate forming different volatile fragments (pyrolysis), exhibit a point of inflexion in the curve of weight versus temperature. From this
18
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
Residue (%) 100
Fig. 3-2: Thermogravimetry of n-Hexacontane TG 750 Atmosphere: Argon, 25 cm3/min Heating Rate p: 10 K/min
1
3.1 Thermogravimetry (TGA)
I
10
I I+
100
200
300
Fig. 3-3: Thermogravimetry of n-Hexatricontane TG 750 Atmosphere: Argon, 25 cm3/min Heating Rate p : 10 K/min
19
20
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
I
Fig. 3-4: Quotient of the Temperatures of 5 % Weight Loss Divided by 1 % Weight Loss versus Boiling Point Temperatures (BP) of n-Alkanes
point the slope of the graph becomes less steep. The temperature at the point of inflexion T , characterizes the pyrolysis behavior of the sample. The slope of the TGA curve from this point of inflexion becomes less step and meets the zeroweight value at relatively high temperatures only if the pyrolysis results in the formation of products of different boiling points. If the pyrolysis produces a coke residue as well as low boiling fragments, then the part of the TGA curve beyond the point of inflexion runs straight, nearly parallel to the temperature axis, demonstrating a constant residual weight (mass). The model substances tested mostly exhibit only one maximum in the curve of weight (mass) loss rate versus temperature (DTG). The maximum temperature will be determined by the boiling behavior of the sample. The same is valid for the DTA curves measured by the Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer (STA 780). Each of the temperatures, which describe the thermal behavior in an inert atmosphere, can be repeated within relatively narrow limits as shown in Table 3-3 by the example of four a-alkanes, and in Table 3-4 for five aroma-
3.1 Thermogravimetry (TGA)
21
Table 3-3: Temperature Statistics ("C) for n-Alkanes -
X
n-Undecane BP = 196 "C T1% 26.90 42.10 T5 % 81.90 T50 % 99.00 DTGrnax DTArnax n-Eicosane BP = 344 "C T1% 118.40 151.27 T5 % 206.55 T50 % 209.47 DTGrnax "A ' max n-Hexatriacontane BP = 499 "C T1% 207.78 239.40 T5 % 305.40 T50 % DTGmaX 318.73 A ''max n-Pentacontane BP = 586°C T1% 23 1.64 255.27 T5 % 347.10 T50 % 359.64 DTGrnax DTArnax
TG 750
-
STA 780
f V (%)
X
f V (%)
8.26 7.92 5.41 4.44
47.89 77.00 124.30 142.00 144.40
7.49 4.90 2.70 3.10 2.02
2.09 1.74 1.76 2.90
174.88 200.20 254.40 262.00 260.30
2.32 2.02 1.54 1.74 1.23
354.70 384.00 446.00 442.90 442.50
3.21 1.31 0.58 1.84 0.58
-
-
5.28 3.21 4.65 3.68 -
1.40 1.28 2.07 1.73 -
tics. The comparison of the boiling points (BP) to the correspondmg evaporation start temperatures T1 % and T5 % in the thermobalance, (Table 3-5) demonstrates that evaporation in the thermobalance takes place at considerably lower temperatures. This is a result of the immediate discharge of the vaporized portions of the sample by the gas flow with the consequence that an equilibrium between evaporation and condensation cannot be established. However, the sample weight (mass) of approximately 5 mg provides a very large surface compared to the volume, so that the experimental conditions resemble those of a thin-layer vacuum distillation. Nevertheless there are differences in the temperatures of equal evaporated portions, and in the DTG maximum temperatures between the two thermobalances TG 750 and STA 780 as a consequence of the different shape of the sample pans:
Diameter (mm) Wall Height (mm) Ratio Surface: Volume
TG 750 Pan
STA 780 Pan
5.0 2.0 0.5
5.3 3.9 0.26
22
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
Table 3-4: Temperature Statistics ("C) for Aromatics TG 750
X
+V (%)
131 159 209 234
3.15 2.36 1.95 1.86
191 228 310 318
2.98 1.86 1.82 2.02
132 157 217 235
3.28 2.86 2.77 3.12
T1% T5 % T50 % DTGmm
136 179 242 26 1
2.98 3.02 2.54 2.23
T1% T5 % T50 % DTGmax
142 169 237 257
2.78 2.75 3.15 2.26
Tiiphenylmethane BP = 360 "C T1% T5 % T50 % DTGmaA 1,3,5-TriphenylbenzeneBP = 460 "C TI % T5 % T5O % DTGm, Fluoranthene BP = 384 "C TI % T5 % T50 % m 'a'''
3-Methylpyrene BP = ?
4-Methylpyrene BP = 410 "C
Table 3-5 Boiling Point ("C)BP Temperature of I % Weight LOSST1 % Temperature of 5 % Weight - Loss T5 %
I
for TG 750 and ST* 780 (Q
TG 750 Substance n-Undecane n-Eicosane n-Triacontane n-Tetracontane n-Pentacontane n-Hexacontane n-Butylbenzene Naphthalene Anthracene Indole 1,1,2,2-Tetraphenylethylene
BP
TI %
T5 %
195.9 343.6 449.9 526.3 585.7 634.2 183.1 218.1 342.0 253.5 417.5
26.9 118.4 189.4 230.6 261.5 286.3 22.8 43.2 115.7 64.0 158.4
42.1 151.3 216.9 263.5 299.0 327.8 38.9 60.8 138.4 83.0 184.2
STA 780 T1% T5 % 47.9 174.9 237.5 278.6 327.5 340.9
77.0 200.2 256.1 309.8 346.9 358.4
3.1 Thermogravimetry (TGA)
23
Even if the ratio surface: volume seems to be nearly equal for equal sample sizes, the higher walls of the STA pan cause a difference in the removal of the evaporated portions. Nor did the use of TG 750 pans in the STA 780 yield identical results, because the geometric conditions of the two ovens are different. Mixtures of model substances give TGA graphs with steps or some levelling, which prevent the exact identification of the components of the mixture, even when their boiling points were considerably separated from each other. For instance Fig. 3-5 demonstrates this on a mixture of equal parts of n-undecane (BP = 196 "C), n-pentacosane (BP = 402 "C), and n-hexatriacontane (BP = 499 "C). The TGA curve of TG 750 exhibits an evaporation start temperature T1 % = 46.8 "C. The first step is terminated at an offset
100
Mo
300
400
500
600
700
Fig. 3-5: Thermogravimetry of Test Mixture of Equal Parts of n-Undecane, n-Pentacosane, and n-Hexatricontane TG 750 Atmosphere: Argon, 25 cm3/min Heating Rate p : 10 K/min
24
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
temperatue of 115 "C. The second step has an onset temperature of 225 "C and an offset temperature of 305 "C. The same experiment carried out using STA 780 gives the following temperatures: T1 % = 56.5 "C, offset1 = 157 "C, onset2 = 290 'C, and offset2 = 390 "C. The DTG curve from TG 750 shows two distinct peaks, at 99 "C and at 256 OC, and an additional shoulder at 327 "C. From STA 780, a DTG curve exhibits three distinct peaks, at 129 "C,296 OC, and 375 "C. In the DTA curve two melting peaks were found, between 36 and 38 "C and between 69 and 71 "C. The first one is almost 10 degreees below the fusion temperature of n-pentacosane, but the second one corresponds nearly to the fusion temperature of n-hexatriacontane (MP = 71 "C). Moreover three distinct maxima are present in the DTA curve, at 129 O C , 296 OC, and at 376 "C. The statistical evaluation of five tests demonstrates that the data described previously can be repeated with small deviations as proved by the coefficients of variation (Table 3-6). Linear polyethylenes containing minimal chain branching (ratio of CH, groups to 1 000 chain C atoms < 1) can be regarded as very long chain n-alkanes. Thermogravimetry proves that they contain minimal portions of vaporizable substances (depending on the mean molecular weight Mw)and depolymerize nearly quantitatively at temperatures above 400 "C. A small coked residue amounting to only 3-5 % was found in the TGA curve after Table 3-6: Temperature Statistics ("C) Mixture of Equal Parts of n-Undecane, npentacosane, n-Hexatriacontane -
T1% T5 % T50 % DTG 1 DTG2 DTG3 DTAl DTA2 DTA3
TG 750
STA 780
-
X
+V (%)
X
f V (%)
46.80 70.80 246.60 99.2 256.0 326.6
2.89 0.96 1.20 3.29 1.24 1.75
56.60 94.00 294.40 131.8 301.8 374.8 128.0 296.0 375.4
6.68 2.26 1.38 2.11 1.03 0.69 2.50 0.79 0.84
Table 3-7: Thermogravimetry of Polyethylene TG 750 Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min Heating rate p = 10 K/min
Mw
5 400 5 900 15 000 60 000 147 000 388 000
Average of Chain Lenght C-Atoms
TI % ("C)
T5 % ("C)
T50 % ("C)
TDTG
385 42 1 1 070 4 825 10 500 27 714
203 248 378 400 398 388
323 349 452 439 427 430
495 483 500 488 489 492
509 496 5 10 492 492 493
("C)
3.1 Therrnogravirnetvy (TGA)
25
a point of inflexion in the vicinity of 500 "C (Fig. 3-6). The DTG curve demonstrates only one maximum around 500 "C. A dependence of the evaporation start temperature on the mean molecular weight M , can only be recognized on polymers having small molecular weights. The temperature of 50 % weight (mass) loss (T50 %) and the temperature of the DTG maximum do not exhibit any dependence on the molecular weight (Table 3-7). This indicates that depolymerization always follows the same reaction mechanism regardless of the C chain length (molecular weight). The aromatics tested (Tables 3-4 and 3-5) normally exhibit a levelling of the TGA curve at weight (mass) losses more than 85-95 %. There is doubt whether this is a real pyrolysis because the point of inflexion T, is in the range from 230 "C up to 300 "C. Nevertheless the length of an aliphatic side chain influences the thermal behavior of substituted pyrenes
- \
147ooc
MW 5'
1 I
d
I I
I:
AI I
d
I I
Fig. 3-6: Thermogravimetry of Polyethylenes of Different Molecular Weights M , TG 750 Atmosphere: Argon, 25 cm3/min Heating Rate p : 10 K/min
26
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
Table 3-8: Thermogravimetry of Pyrenes and Alkylpyrenes (TG 750) Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min Heating Rate p= 10 K/min Substance
T1% ("C) 133 136 142 169 182
M
Pyrene 3-Methylpyrene 4-Methylpyrene Pentylpyrene n-Hex ylpyrene
202 216 216 272 286
TS% ("C) 162 179 169 206 214
T50% ("C) 215 242 237 272 282
-
262 255 305 305
TpTG ( C) 235 26 1 257 302 302
(Table 3-8). The increase of the side-chain by five CH, groups from methyl to hexyl pyrene has the consequence of increasing the temperatures characterizing evaporation by 3540 "C. Regarding pure n-alkanes of nearly the same boiling range, i. e. n-C,,H,, and n-C,,H6,, a difference in the corresponding temperatures of 32 "C to 42 "C is found. The data representing the boiling behavior of the homologous series of alkyl substituted pyrenes can be displayed easily as a function of the C number of the aliphatic side chain (Fig. 3-7). This is analogous to the behavior of the homologous series of the mono-, di-,
1
2
3
4
5
Fig. 3-7: Thermogravimetry of Pyrene and Alkylpyrenes TG 750 Temperature of 1 % Weight Loss (T1 %) Temperature of 5 % Weight Loss (T5 %) Temperature of 50 % Weight Loss (T50 %) Temperature of the DTG Maximum (TDTG)
6
3.1 Thevmogravirnetry (TGA)
10 0
150
200
250
27
3 00
Fig. 3-8: Boiling Point Temperatures (BP) of Aromatics versus Molecular Weights (M)
and trisubstituted alkylbenzenes, where the boiling point versus the chain length (C number) of the alkyl substituent also gives a steady function. Even the boiling points of the series of condensed aromatics versus the molecular weight results in a steady curve (Fig. 38). The behavior of the substances specified in ASTM D 2887-84, Table X 1-1, (this Chapter, Table 3-2) is different because these substances are not members of an homologous series but represent olefins, cycloalkanes, aromatics, and heterocompounds. The condensed aromatics and the polar compounds containing heteroatoms such as oxygen, sulfur, or nitrogen diverge distinctly from the boiling behavior of the non-aromatics of equal molecular weight (Fig. 3-9). Therefore it is understood that the evaporation behavior in the thermobalance ist also different.
28
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100 I
I
100
150
I
200
250
J
300
Fig. 3-9: Boiling Point Temperatures (BP) of Substances according to ASTM 2887-84, Table X1.l (Table 3-2) versus Molecular Weights ( M )
3.1.2 Simulated distillation The fact that volatile substances will vaporize at temperatures far below their atmospheric boiling point, due to the gas flow through the oven of the thermobalance, can be used to perform a simulated distillation [3-1 to 3-41. In contrast to the simulated distillation by gas chromatography GC [3-5, 3-61 no partition or rectification effect can be assumed during evaporation in a thermobalance. Therefore calibration can only take place using individual substances of known boiling points. It seems reasonable to use the substances which are named for calibration in the standards of simulated distillation by GC [3-5, 3-61.
3.1 Thermogravimetry (TGA)
29
For calibration, the temperatures of the weight losses of 1 %, 5 %, 10 % and up to 100 % or up to evident cracking symptoms were assembled from the TGA graphs of individual substances, and drawn versus the evaporated portion, similar to the Engler curves in DIN 51 572 [3-71. Fig. 3-10 demonstrates this in the diagram for n-hexatriacontane. It can be seen that cracking of the sample starts at a temperature above 320 "C when 70 % has already evaporated. In the TG 750 the lower n-alkanes, up to a carbon number of approximately 40 to 44, do not crack at all. The higher ones start cracking when about 70 or 80 % of the sample has evaporated. In the STA 780 every n-alkane can be vaporized without decomposition except n-pentacontane and n-hexacontane. Fig. 3-1 1 shows the Engler curves of the n-alkanes measured using TG 750 (extrapolated to 100 % weight loss). Fig. 3-12 shows the Engler curves of the substances presented in Table 3-2, also acquired by TG 750. The repeatability is worse at small weight losses than at higher ones. However, the repeatability is much better for the homologous series of n-alkanes than for the group of chemicals from ASTM D 2887-84 (Fig. 3-13).
(TG 750)
n-C36 600 .
500
:1
T ("C)
i
400
300
200
0
20
40
60
80
100
Fig. 3-10: Thermogravimetry of n-Hexatriacontane Diagram analogous to DIN 5 1 75 1 TG 750
T ("C)
-4
n-CSO
43u
400
350
300
250
n-ci9
200
n-C17
150 -
Loss ( w t - % )
Fig. 3-11: Thermogravimetry of n-Alkanes Diagram analogous to DIN 5 1 751 TG 750
3.1 Thermogravirnetry (TGA) 550
31
-
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
Fig. 3-12: Thermogravimetry of Substances according to ASTM 2887-84 Table X1.l (Table 3-2) Diagram analogous to DIN 51 751 TG 750
32
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances 30
-77 -25 ba
Y
w +I
$20 4J .C
2
u
*
'\
-
---\
i '' : Ic
i2 5 \5 :
-
0
I
0
S
20
A
u "
1
--
3 l
"
'
"
'
~
60
40
L 0
l
s s
'
"
80
~
100
(wt-%)
Fig. 3-13: Coefficient of Variation (kv) of the Temperatures versus Weight Losses Curve 1: n-Alkanes (TG 750) Curve 2: Substances'according ASTM (TG 750) Curve 3: n-Alkanes (STA 780) Curve 4: Substances according ASTM (STA 780)
By plotting the temperature of the actual adequate weigJ loss TTGversus the carbon number C of the n-alkane one obtains curves of a logarithmic function TTG=a, ln(C + aJ + where and
Eq. 3-1
TTG= Temperature in the thermobalance C = Carbon number of the individual n-alkane.
This is demonstrated in Fig. 3-14, which shows the TG temperatures versus the carbon numbers of the n-alkanes for a weight loss of 50 %. The curves representing other percentages of weight loss are identical. After a corresponding temperature shift, every one is congruent to the curve of the extrapolated boiling points of the n-alkanes (Fig. 3-15) [3-81. The correlation is very good (coefficient of correlation r = 0.990 at weight loss of 1 %; starting from weight loss 5 % the correlation coefficient rises to r > 0.995). The dependence of the maximum temperature of the reaction rate TDTG obeys a second order function
TDTG = a4 C?
+ a5 C + as
Eq. 3-2
3.1 Thermogravimetry (TGA) TG 7 5 0
500
33
T 50 %
T ("C)
400
-
. .
C-Number
0
-7-T-TTT7-P I
20
10
0
30
40
50
-
9
I
70
60
Fig. 3-14: Temperatures of 50 % Weight Loss versus C-Numbers of n-Alkanes (TG 750)
800
600
400
200
C-Number
0
~
1- -----.--v
0
20
40
60
80
100
Fig. 3-15: Boiling Points (BP) of n-Alkanes versus C-Numbers (According to 0. Glinzer) [3-81
34
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
demonstrating a correlation coefficient Y = 0.995 (Fig. 3-16). The graph of the boiling point (BP) of the n-alkanes versus the corresponding temperature in the thermobalance TTG (Fig. 3-17), is that of a linear function for each percentage of weight loss B P = a TTG+ b
Eq. 3-3
400 -
*
300
-
*
200 -
100 -
C-Number J
Fig. 3-16: Temperatures of the Maxima of Weight Loss Rate versus C-Numbers of n-Alkanes TG 750
The correlation coefficient for 1 % weight loss is Y = 0.986, for 5 % Y = 0.994, and for weight losses exceeding 10 % the correlation coefficient increases to Y > 0.997. The coefficients of equation 3-3 are different for each weight loss and decrease at increasing weight losses (Fig. 3-18 and 3-19). The ascertained functions are always of the same kind regardless to the type of thermobalance or the series of calibration substances, but the coefficients are, naturally, different. Nevertheless there is a linear relation between the data
3.1 Thermogravimetry (TGA)
35
600 500
1
400
1
300
7
200
i
1 0
200
100
300
400
500
Fig. 3-1 7: Boiling Points (BP) versus Temperatures in the Thermobalance at 50 % Weight Loss (TsTA) of n-Alkanes BP = a . TsTA+ b (Equation 3-3)
x10134
132
130 m 4J .r
128
u
.r
+ 01
126
u 124
,
122
0
120 0
20
40
60
W e i g h t Loss %
80
100
Fig. 3-18: Coefficient a of Equation 3-3 versus Weight Loss AG of a-Alkanes STA 780 a=x.AG+y x=-1.18682 10.’ y = 1.3355 r = 0.9818
36
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
140
t
120
100
20 "O
I
0 0
20
40
60
60
100
Weight Loss %
Fig. 3-19: Coefficient b of Equation 3-3 versus Weight Loss AG of n-Alkanes STA 780 b = x . l n ( A G ) + y x = - 21.9653 y = 153.538 r= 0.99265
achieved by TG 750 and the data achieved by STA 780 regardless of the differences in oven geometry and sample pans. With the help of this linear function the temperatures of equal weight losses can be converted from one thermobalance to the other. The coefficients a and b of equation 3-3 permit the calculation of the distillation curve at atmospheric pressure of an unknown substance from its TGA curve. This is shown in Fig. 3-20, which depicts the distillation curve of a mixture of equal portions of n-dodecane (BP = 216 "C), n-pentacosane (PB = 402 "C), and n-hexatriacontane (BP = 499 "C). The step between the two substances which have a difference in the boiling point of approximately 200 "C (C12and C2J is easy to recognize. Less obvious is the transition from n-C,, to n-C,,, the signal of the DTG demonstrates two distinct peak maxima too, which permit the calculation of two boiling temperatures (213 "C and 400 "C). Moreover there is a shoulder in the curve which corresponds to a boiling temperature of 489 "C (measurements by TG 750). The result of the simulated distillation of a test mixture of substances from ASTM D 2887-84 is shown in Fig. 3-21. The diagram demonstrates the distillation curve of a mixture of equal portions of cumene (BP = 152.5 "C), 1-octadecene (BP = 315 "C), and triphenylmethane (BP = 360 "C). The application of the simulated distillation on real systems (technical substances) will be described in section 4.2.3.3.
3.1 Thermogravimetry (TGA)
37
Fig. 3-20: Simulated Distillation Curve of a Test Mixture of Equal Parts of n-Undecane, n-Pentacosane, and n-Hexatriacontane (TG 750)
38
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
Fig. 3-21: Simulated Distillation Curve of a Test Mixture of Equal Parts of Cumene, I-Octadecene, and Triphenylene methane (TG 750)
A simulated distillation by thermogravimetry may be carried out in principle by substituting the flow of inert gas by the application of vacuum, but the adjustment and the maintenance of a defined vacuum in,very narrow limits is considerably more difficult than the adjustment and maintenance of a defined gas flow rate.
3.1.3 Thermogravimetry in an oxidizing atmosphere The thermogravimetric oxidation tests were performed using air as oxidizing agent. Information trials using oxygen had disclosed very fast oxidation reactions, sometimes so fast that effects are overtaken and concealed which are clearly visible in air.With regard to
3.1 Thermogravimetry (TGA)
39
the transfer of the technique to practical or industrial conditions, thermogravimetry using air is preferable. Air is also preferred in tests on model substances on the grounds of comparability. However, this may have the disadvantage that sometimes substances will evaporate prior to the start of the oxidizing reaction due to their low boiling point. For example n-dodecane (BP = 216 "C) evaporates completely before any oxidation can start. The TGA curves both in argon and in air are identical (Fig. 3-22 curve No. 1). The corresponding DTG curve exhibits only one peak maximum at 150 "C in argon as well as in air, certainly caused by evaporation. Even the major portion of n-hexatriacontane (PB = 499 "C) evaporates or cracks before any deviation of the TGA curve in air from the TGA curve in argon can be perceived (Fig. 3-22 curves No. 2 and 3). The DTG curve
Fig. 3-22: Thermogravimetry (TG 750)
Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min Curve 1: n-Dodecane in Argon and in Air Curve 2: n-Hexatriacontane in Argon Curve 3: n-Hexatriacontane in Air
40
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
exhibits a twin peak in argon at maximum temperatures of 309 "C and 3 18 OC: whereas the DTG curve in air displays only one sharp peak at 293 "C. The test run on n-hexacontane demonstrates a distinct difference of the TGA curves in argon and in air right from the beginning (Fig. 3-23). In argon the DTG curve exhibits only one maximum at 418 "C, which indicates a crack reaction. On the other hand there are six maxima of the DTG curve in air at temperatures of 296,357,375,388,462, and 530 "C. Those maxima correspond, at least partly, to the three theoretical steps of the oxidation reaction [3-91. In the first reaction step, addition of oxygen takes place in a temperature range between 200 "C and 300 "C, when non-volatile oxygen-containing products are formed. This range is called low temperature oxidation (LTO). The TGA curves shown before do not give any indication of
1
1 300 0
PO0
1
0
\
I
m
-yi
600
7
Fig. 3-23: Thermogravimetry of n-Hexacontane (TG 750) Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Argon Curve 2: Air
3.1 Thermogravimetry (TGA)
41
oxygen uptake. In a temperature range from approximately 300°C to 400 or 45OoC, simultaneous combustion and pyrolysis reactions occur accompanied by the formation of gaseous products, more or less volatile hydrocarbons, coke residue, and carbon black. This range is called fuel deposition because of the formation of non-volatile combustible residues. In the last range above 450 "C the deposited residues will be burned. Therefore this range is called fuel combustion. In tests on n-alkanes and nearly all the other substances there is no increase in sample weight in the temperature range corresponding to low temperature oxidation. Only substances with high boiling points and containing a high concentration of carbon double bonds, such as polybutadiene, have an increase in weight in the LTO range (Fig. 3-24). This increase of only + 1.4 % is very small compared to the theoretical.increase of + 29 %. As a consequence of the small increase in weight there is no
Fig. 3-24: Thermogravimetry of Polybutadiene (TG 750) Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min
42
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
evaluable peak in the DTG curve. During experiments on non-evaporable n-alkanes such as high density polyethylene (M, = 15 000) no rise in weight was found, but a flattening of the TG curve in the temperature range between 220 "C and 380 "C (Fig. 3-25). Above 380 "C the weight loss becomes nearly linear with respect to the temperature. Two points of inflexion are found in the TGA curve at 400 "C and at 440 "C. The flattening between 220 "Cand 380 "C indicates that there the weight loss caused by evaporation (cracking) is compensated partly by the uptake of oxygen. The temperature range from 380 "C to 440 "C can be regarded as fuel deposition. Then the fuel combustion follows at temperatures above 440 "C. The DTG curve in argon only displays one maximum at a temperature of 510 "C, which is certainly caused by pyrolysis. On the other hand, the DTG curve of the reaction in air presents three sharp peaks with maximum temperatures of 375 'C, 410 'C, and 427 "C and a weak peak at 522 "C. When repeating the experiment using the simulta-
Argon
Air
I
__
\
I
I I
1 I
I I I \
\
.
500
- Tf0C) 3
7w
Fig. 3-25: Thermogravimetry of HD-Polyethylene (TG 750) Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min
3.1 Therrnogravimetry (TGA)
43
neous thermal analyzer, the same DTG peaks and additional exothermal DTA peaks were found at identical temperatures. In no case were any endothermal DTA peaks found. The statistical evaluation of repeated experiments does not show any differences between the mean values of the temperatures of the DTA and DTG peaks within the confidence level. Most of the aromatics from Table 3-2, up to and including anthracene, which were tested, evaporate or sublimate below the temperature of 225 "C in the flow of inert gas through the thermobalance. Most of the aromatics also evaporate or sublimate in the flow of air, due to their high oxidation stability. Fig. 3-26 demonstrates that in experiments with n-hexylpyrene, a deviation of the oxidation from the evaporation curve first occurs above 300 "C. In the oxidation experiment a small portion of coke is deposited, which will bum at temperatures above 450 "C.
Fig. 3-26: Thermogravimetry of n-Hexylpyrene (TG 750) Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min
44
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
Even relatively bulky molecules such as adamantane, evaporate or sublimate completely and thus present identical TGA and DTG curves both in argon and in air. The DTG curve exhibits one peak only at a temperature of 140 "C. The start of the oxidation reaction of an individual substance or of a mixture of several substances can be ascertained by comparing the TGA curves of experiments in argon and in air,provided that the experiments are carried out using the same heating and gas flow rates. However, the measurement in air by means of DSC or DTA gives more exact results (see chapter 3.2.2). Generally the oxidation starts at relatively high temperatures. Using a heating rate p= 10 K/min, the start temperature of oxidation for substances containing reactive carbon double bonds is in the range from 130 "C to 150 'C, for aliphatic hydrocarbons in the range from 200 "C to 220 'C, and for aromatics above 300 "C. Experiments in air using different heating rates have demonstrated not only a parallel shift of the TGA curves to higher temperatures at faster heating rates, but also a change of the appearance of the curve, as shown in Fig. 3-27 for n-hexacontane at heating rates from 5 up to 100 K/min. Whereas the curve at p= 10 K/min is more or less a parallel displacement of the curve at p= 5 K/min, the curve at p= 20 K h i n shows quite another form. The date for the TGA and DTG temperatures in Table 3-9 demonstrate, especially in the case of the DTG maximum temperatures, that at fast heating rates effects are taken over, and obscured, which are still present at slower heating rates. At heating rates exceeding 50 K/min only one sharp peak appears at 344 "C (50 K/min) or 383 "C (100 K/min)
100
75
50
25
Fig. 3-27: Therrnogravimetry of n-Hexacontane in Air (TG 750) Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min Curve 1: 5K/min Curve2: 10K/min Curve 3: 20 K/min Curve4: 50K/min Curve 5: 100 K/min
3.1 Thermogravimetiy (TGA)
45
Table 3-9: n-Hexacontane in Air, Dependence of the TGA and DTG Data on the Heating Rate Heating Rate
p
T1 % ("C) T5 % ("C) T50 % ("C) DTG,n, ("C)
5 K/min
10 K/min
20 K/min
50 K/min
100 K/min
210 228 295 277 350 368 430 510
215 239 307 296 375 390 462 539
232 257 320 3 10 370 446 450 546
240 279 344 344
25 1 29 1 383 383
-
-
-
-
-
-
570
548
a
maximum temperature, whereas the last maximum at approximately 550 "C becomes very weak. The phenomenon of the change of the shape of the curve should be considered in the evaluation of the reaction kinetics according to Flynn and Wall (see section 3.3.5). As a matter of fact, experiments at constant temperature prove that at a very fast heating rate (p= 100 K/min) oxidation no longer occurs (see section 3.1.4).
3.1.4 Isothermal thermogravimetry The reactions which take place at elevated temperatures exhibit a dependence on the reaction temperature as well as on the reaction (residence) time. The dependence on the temperature is described by the Arrhenius kinetic equation (see section 3.3.1). The dependence on the reaction time at a constant temperature can be ascertained by isothermal thermogravimetry. This generally applies to evaporation, pyrolysis (cracking), and oxidation processes. The aimed test temperature should be attained as quickly as possible. Therefore heating rates were chosen, which are the maximum rates for each instrument (TG 750: p= 100 K/min; STA 780: p= 50 K/min). Using a heating rate of p= 100 K/min, a final constant temperature of 250 "C will be attained within 2.5 minutes. Fig. 3-28 shows the graph of the weight loss of high density polyethylene (M,= 15 000) versus the residence time at a reaction temperature of 250 "C in air and in argon (flow rate: 25 cm3/ min). The diagram shows that the oxidation process is still not complete after 150 minutes, but it has slowed down compared to the reaction rate during the starting phase. It is well known that the oxidation reaction has an induction period, but this induction period can be concealed at extremely fast heating rates as Fig. 3-29 demonstrates in the example of n-hexacontane. In all experiments a heating rate p= 100 K/min was used to attain different constant final temperatures. The loss of weight starts after almost three minutes regardless of the target final temperature. It can be seen that in the experiments with the highest final temperatures of 455 "C and 465 "C a loss of the total sample weight occurs within one minute both in argon and in air. This means that the evaporation (or cracking) is faster than the oxidation and so no oxidation reaction may start. In the temperature range of approximate 300 "C the behavior of n-hexacontane both in argon and
46
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
100
75
50
25
30
60
90
120
150
Fig. 3-28: Isothermal Thermogravimetry at 250 "C (TG 750) HD-Polyethylene M, = 15 000 Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min
in air resembles the behavior of polyethylene (Fig. 3-28) i. e. small weight loss in argon and a weight loss increased by a factor of four in air after 15 minutes reaction time. The phenomenon that depolymerization or pyrolysis reactions are faster than oxidation reactions was unexpected and is shown in Fig. 3-30 in the example of SEBS copolymer (styrene - ethylene - butene - styrene) which represents an alkyl substituted aromatic. Total loss of the sample weight occurs at a temperature of about 450 "C within identical reaction times in both argon and air. Figs. 3-29 and 3-30 also demonstrate that in the medium temperature range, 300 "(2-350 'C, only the first two reaction steps of the oxidation reaction take place within the residence time of 15 minutes, i. e. low temperature oxidation and fuel deposition. The deposited coke residue does not oxidize during this time. This is proved by the asymptotic rise of the curve of weight loss against time. Within ten minutes at a constant temperature of approximately 350 "C the curves of both substances arrive at a final weight loss of 80 % or 85 % representing 20 % (15 %) coke residue. The termination of the experiment after 15 minutes residence time may result in misleading conclusions. Fig. 3-31 shows the isothermal oxidation of coronene at a constant temperature of 350 "C. Up to approximately 30 minutes residence time the curve seems to exhibit an asymptotic rise, but after 35 minutes the characteristicof the curve changes to an exponential rise, which is typical for autocatalytic ractions. After a residence time of 75
3.I Thermogravimetry (TGA)
47
lo(
90
80 70 60
so 10 30 20 10
5
10
15
Fig. 3-29: Isothermal Thermogravimetry at Different Final Temperatures (TG 750) n-Hexacontane Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min
minutes, corresponding to a weight loss of 90 %, the slope of the curve flattens and attains the final value of 100 % weight loss after nearly 100 minutes. All experiments were carried out using TG 750, at a heating ratep=100 K/min and a gas flow rate of 25 cm3/min.
3.1.5 Experiments using the simultaneous thermal analyzer The experiments described in this section were performed using a Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer STA 780 (Stanton-Redcroft Ltd.). This instrument supplies the measuring signals temperature (T), weight (TGA), first derivative of weight with respect to time
48
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
t Mass Loss
Fig. 3-30: Isothermal Thermogravimetry at Different Final Temperatures (TG 750) SEBS Copolymerisate Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min
(DTG), and differential thermal analysis (DTA). In the first stages of experimental work the signals were recorded by means of a four-pen line recorder and evaluated manually. Later on the instrument was equipped with a personal computer (PC) for control, data sampling, and data evaluation. At the time of acquisition, DSC systems with a maximum temperature limit of only 600 "C were available, so a DTA system possessing an upper temperature limit of 1 000 "C was purchased. In the meantime heat-flux DSC systems with upper temperature li&ts of 1 000 "C or 1 500 "C have been developed. In any case DSC is preferred to DTA systems, because the DSC supplies energy values directly, whereas DTA only provides differences between sample and reference temperatures, which then have to be converted to energy data. Simultaneous instrumentation allows changes in weight and in energy of the same sample to be measured during the same experiment. Each test carried out by the author was performed using an empty pan for reference.
3.1 Thermogravimetry (TGA)
49
100
75
50
25
Fig. 3-31: Isothermal Therrnogravimetry at 350 "C in air (TG 750) Coronene Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min
In the experiments using n-alkanes for model substances the DTA signal supplies the temperatures and the areas of the fusion (melting) and the boiling peaks in addition to the TGA and DTG curves. Integration of the peak area gives a value possessing the unusual dimension pV . s . mg-' (Fig. 3-32). The conversion to energy (enthalpy) data, dimension J . g-l, is possible in principle but raises some difficulties. Evaluation of the maximum temperatures of the fusion (melting) peaks (MP) demonstrates good conformity of the measured data to the data from literature references [3-10, 3-11].
50
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances 110
1 6 7 0 9
70
10
M
-I II
190.74 i97.S 202.94 208.77 2i4.34
70.053 60.073 10.191 40.274 30.203
-
10
-
5
-
0
- a
227.07 C
POINT Tk6LE
-
-LO
-
-1B
-
-20
-
-a
2 226.70
10
1
0
B
ib0
is0 oeg
c
2bo
250
Fig. 3-32: Thermogravimetry of n-Nonadecane Plot of STA 780: TGA and DTA Atmosphere: Argon, 30 + 20 cm3/min Heating Rate p: 10 K/min
Fig. 3-33: Melting Point Temperatures (MP) versus C-Numbers of n-Alkanes Curve 1: Data from STA 780 Curve 2: Data from References [3-10, 3-11]
30
3.1 Thermogravimetry (TGA)
10
20
30
40
50
51
60
Fig. 3-34: Heat of Fusion Hfof n-Alkanes Area of the Melting Peak of STA 780 versus C-Numbers
In Fig. 3-33, curve No. 1 shows the DTA temperature data and curve No. 2 the fusion temperature data from the references, both plotted against the carbon number of the n-alkanes. After refining the calibration of the instrument the curves will be brought into congruence. The integral of the peak area, which should be equivalent to the heat of fusion Hfdoes not conform so well. The graph of the peak area versus the carbon number of the n-alkanes (Fig. 3-34) shows heavy scattering of the data, although the general direction is still recognizable. This tendency is even more distinct than that in the analogeous graph of the data of the heats of fusion Hffrom the literature versus the carbon number (Fig. 335). The evaporation peak results in a graph of the DTA peak maximum temperatures versus the carbon number which exhibits very little scattering (Fig. 3-36). The shape of the curve is similar to that of the boiling points (BP) from literature references (Fig. 3-15). A linear correlation exists:
BP = a . T,,+
b
with a = 1.2238 and b = 47.4372
Eq. 3-4
52
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
0 0
0
a 0
C-Number -r
10
20
30
I
! I
60
Fig. 3-35: Heat of Fusion Hf of n-Alkanes
Data from References [3-10, 3-11] versus C-Numbers
The correlation is excellent with the coefficient of correlation r = 0.99723. The graph of data of the peak areas versus the carbon number shows a higher degree of scattering (Fig. 3-37) which is likewise present in the graph of the data of the heats of vaporization (H,) from literature references versus the carbon number (Fig. 3-38). Nevertheless the pattern of both curves shows the same direction. Comparison of the DTG and DTA temperatures of the peak maxima of the evaporation gives an average temperature difference of 0.88 % of the measured value (maximum 1.66 %, minimum 0.27 %). The DTG maximum temperature seems to be somewhat lower than the DTA maximum but this difference is within experimental tolerance. So it may be assumed that the temperatures of the maximum of the evaporation rate and of the maximum of energy flow are identical. The conversions (weight losses) corresponding to those temperatures are also identical within experimental error.
3.1 Thermogravimetry (TGA) 500
400
300
200
100
10
20
30
40
50
60
Fig. 3-36: Temperatures of Vaporization (DTA) versus C-Numbers of n-Alkanes (STA 780) Atomosphere: Argon, 30 + 20 cm3/min Heating Rate p: 10 K/min
500
400
300
200
100
Fig. 3-37: Heat of Vaporization versus C-Numbers of n-Alkanes Area of the Vaporization Peak (STA 780)
53
54
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
10
20
30
40
50
60
Fig. 3-38: Heat of Vaporization versus C-Numbers of n-Alkanes Data from References [3-10, 3-11]
3.2 Differential scanning calorimetry on model substances 3.2.1 DSC in an inert atmosphere The model substances for DSC were the same as those used for thermogravimetry (see section 3.1) such as the series of n-alkanes and some of the substances listed in ASTM D 2887-84. If an appropriate gas flow rate was used, then evaporation without residue of all the tested n-alkanes resulted, as already described for thermogravimetry. Fig. 3-39 demonstratesthis behaviour for n-hexacontane. At a temperature of 99 "C there is a sharp fusion (melting) peak exhibiting a heat of fusion H,= 243.3 J . g-l. At 439 "C the maximum of energy resorption for the evaporation process appears, which has an onset temperature of 409 "C. The low energy resorption of 136 J . g-I indicates the occurrence of an evaporation process.
3.2 Differential Scanning Calorimetry on Model Substances
55
0 7.71 OC
13.3J/g
136.3319
-5
E
" -10
u. +J
(I
I
-15
99.
-20
."-c
100
I
200
I
300
I
400
500
I
600
7 0
Temperature <*C)
Fig. 3-39: DSC of Hexacontane Atmosphere: Argon, 5 cm3/min, 1 bar Heating Rate p : 5 K/min
The graph of the peak maximum temperatures of evaporation versus the carbon numbers of the n-alkanes is shown in Fig. 3-40. An increase of the pressure in the DSC cell up to 10 bar results in a shift of the curve to higher temperatures. The shift is larger in the range of low boiling points then in the range of the high boiling substances (experimental conditions: heating rate p= 10 K/min, gas flow rate = 5 cm3/min): Substance
Peak Temperature ( "C) 1 bar 10 bar
n-decane n-triacontane n-hexacontane
113 347 462
158 383 478
Difference ( "C) 45 36 16
Change of the heating rate p causes a shift of the peak maximum temperatures. In that case the curve of the peak maximum temperatures versus the carbon number will be shifted to a parallel position (Fig. 3-41). They all display a pattern similar to the graph of extrapolated boiling points versus the carbon numbers of the n-alkanes (Fig. 3-15) and likewise obey a logarithmic function:
56
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
Fig. 3-40: DSC of n-Alkanes at Different Pressures Temperatures of the Endothermal Peaks versus C-Numbers Atmosphere: Argon, 5 cm3/min; 1 and 10 bar Heating Rate p: 10 K/min
1
L
10
20
30
40
50
60
Fig. 3-41: DSC of n-Alkanes at Different Heating Rates Temperatures of the Endothermal Peaks versus C-Numbers Atmosphere: Argon, 5 cm3/min Parameter: Heating Rate p Curve 1: p= 5 K/min Curve 2: p= 10 K/min Curve 3: p= 20 K/min Curve 4: p= 50 K/min
3.2 Differential Scanning Calorimetry on Model Substances
+ a3
T,,, = a, . ln(C +%)
57
Eq. 3-5
The coefficients a,, 3,and a3are primarily dependent on the heating rate j?. For the four applied heating rates @= 5, 10, 20, and 50 K/min) correlation coefficients of Eq. 3-5 between Y = 0.993 and Y = 0.998 were found. Comparison of the peak maximum temperatures TDscto the corresponding boiling points BP results in linear functions for each heating rate p: TDsc= a4. BP + as
Eq. 3-6
As Fig. 3-42 shows for the heating rate p= 10 K/min. The correlation is also very good with correlation coefficient Y > 0.995. The coefficients a4 and as are independent of the heating rate p but depend on the gas flow rate. The boiling points (average values) of vaporizable substances can be ascertained by DSC using the coefficients a4and as. It is not possible to establish the distillation curve since there is no information about weight or volume changes, but the offset and onset temperatures may be used to calculate the initial and the final boiling points [3-121. Application of the correlation of the peak temperatures to the heating rates for calculation of the Arrhenius kinetic parameters and of the heat of vaporization will be considered in chapter 3.3.2. 10 K/min .I
Boiling Point ("C)
0
100
.
.
.
200
.
.
.
.
.
.
300
.
.
.
.
.
400
.
.
.
. . . 500
Fig. 3-42: DSC of n-Alkanes Peak Temperatures of DSC versus Boiling Points (BP) Atomosphere: Argon, 5 cm3/min Heating Rate p : 10 K/min
.
.
-
.
.
600
.
58
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
Table 3-10: Melting Point MP and Boiling Point BP of Aromatics Compared to Peak Temperatures in DSC (Atmosphere 10 bar Methane, Flow Rate 5 cm3/min, Heating Rate /?= 10 K/min) Substance ~~
Anthracene 2-Methylanthracene 9-Methylanthracene 9,lO-Dimethylanthracene 9,lO-Diphenyl anthracene 9,lO-Dihydroanthracene Phenanthrene 2-Methylphenanthrene Fluoranthene Pyrene 3-Methylpyrene 4-Methylpyrene Triphenylene Coronene 1,3,5-Triphenylbenzene Triphenylmethane
178.24 192.26 192.26 206.29 330.43 180.25 178.24 192.26 202.60 202.26 216.28 216.28 228.30 300.36 306.41 255.34
218 207 81 181 244-247 108 101 55-56 110 156 -
147.5-148.5 199 438-440 174 92-93
216.5 205.5 77 178.5 243.5 104.0 99.0 53.5 108.5 149.0 65 .O 146.5 195.5 -
169.5 90.5
342 subl. 196112 subl. -
313 332 175-180,,, 384 393 -
410 425 525 460 360
291.25 275.0 284.5 296.25 383.75 243.75 281.25 276.25 303.75 337.50 330.00 343.75 343.75 455.75 375.00 275.50
Aromatics also evaporate or sublimate in the flow of inert gas at significantly lower temperatures than their boiling point (Table 3- 10). Although the experiments were performed at a pressure of 10 bar in the DSC cell in order to shift the vaporization to higher temperatures, the measured peak temperatures are up to 90 "C below the boiling points (BP) of the substances (at a heating rate p= 10 K/min). The difference between the peak temperatures and the boiling points decreases at increasing heating rates; reaching approximately only 50 "C at a heating rate p= 50 K/min. Dependence of the temperature of the maximum of energy uptake on the molecular weight can be established for condensed aromatics, both alkylsubstituted and unsubstituted (Fig. 3-43). Substances which do not belong to the condensed aromatics do not satisfy this model, even though they have a corresponding molecular weight; for example, triphenylmethane (Fig. 3-43, No. 2), 1, 3,5-triphenylbenzene (Fig. 3-43, No. 3), or 9, 10-diphenylanthracene(Fig. 3-43, No, 4). Also, substances having a bulky molecule structure such as the non-aromatic adamantane (Fig. 3-43, No. 1) show a deviation from the curve. Generally a strong functionality between data from thermoanalysis, representing evaporation behavior, and molecular weight or the carbon number of the substances, can only be ascertained for the members of homologous series. This is not confined to thermoanalysis but is also evident for other physical methods. In the homologous series of alkylsubstituted pyrenes the peak maximum temperatures of evaporation increases only a little when the length of the carbon chain of the alkylsubstituent increases:
3.2 Differential Scanning Calorimetry on Model Substances
59
Fig. 3-43; DSC of Aromatics DSC Peak Temperatures of Condensed non substituted and alkane substituted Aromatics versus Molecular Weights Atmosphere: Argon, 5 cm3/min Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Point 1: Adamantane Point 2: Triphenylene methane Point 3: 1, 3, 5-Tnphenylene benzene Point 4: 9, 10-Diphenylene anthracene
pyrene 4-methylp yrene pentylpyrene n-hexylpyrene
337 343 349 35 1
An increase of pressure gives similar effects with both aromatics and n-alkanes. The dependence of the maximum temperature of the evaporation peak on the heating rate is also analogous to the n-alkanes. From DSC tests, data on the melting point MP and the heat of fusion (melting) Hf are obtained. If the experiment is started at room temperature then data of the series of n-alkanes may be obtained, probably beginning with n-heptadecane (MP = 22 "C). If a commercial refrigerator (temperature range from -65 "C up to 250 "C) is used to cool the DSC cell, fusion and crystallization events my be recorded down to n-octane (MP= -56.8 "C).The cooling/heating rates should not exceed 5 K/min in order to measure
60
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
correctly any crystallization phenomena. The fusion and crystallization behavior of 12heneicosane is shown in Fig. 3-44. Whereas the melting point (MP) is only slightly affected by the heating rate, fi its influence on the crystallization is so large that an activation energy of crystallization may be calculated, using the shift of the peak temperatures caused by varying heating rates (see chapter 3.3.2). The melting and crystallization peaks may be easily integrated in order to calculate the heats concerned (enthalpies) as Fig. 3-45 shows for the fusion peak of n-eicosane. The data of the onset temperature, the peak maximum temperature, and the heat of fusion are recorded. From about n-nonadecane up to n-tetxacontane, two peaks have been recorded, for both fusion (melting) and for crystallization, with few exceptions (Fig. 3-44). Both peaks can be evaluated more or less easily. The true fusion or the true crystallization peak always appears at a higher temperature than the secondary peak. With increasing carbon numbers of the n-alkanes the values found by the secondary peaks decrease (Table 3-11). The appearance of the secondary peaks is not caused by pollution by another n-alkane of a shorter carbon chain length, as may be suspected; the proportion of the two peak areas is too large for that. Rather, some change in structure or modification, similar to the memory effects of polymers, is responsible for the secondary peaks. Sometimes the secondary peak is present during the crystalli-
1
-5
237.2J/g 70360. J/mole
56.68J/g 16810. J/mole
-
-10-
32.87T
-15
J 41.35OC I
I
Tempwoture (OC)
Fig. 3-44: DSC of n-Alkanes LOWTemperature Behavior of n-Heneicosane Sealed Pan Atomosphere: Argon, static, 1bar Heating/Cooling Rate p : 2 K/min
3.2 Differential Scanning Calorimetry on Model Substances
61
I
Table 3-11: Melting Behavior of n-Alkanes by DSC Atmosphere: 1 bar Argon, Flow Rate 5 cm3/min Heating Rate p = 2 K/min Substance
Purity 76
97 (GC) 98 (GC) 97 (GC) 97 (GC) 95 (GC) 99 (GC) 98 (GC) purum puriss. 99" 98"
* CH Analysis
Secondary Peak Mean Peak MP ("C) Hf (J.g-') MP ("C) Hf (J-g-') -
-
22.31
45.1
-
-
32.87 50.00 60.10 73.97
56.7 63.9 59.7 15.8
-
-
28.96 31.71 35.45 41.35 54.3 64.1 80.1 81.79 89.01 92.78 99.09
234.2 228.5 206.4 237.2 151.6 130.3 197.6 237.8 238.5 236.7 195.9
C H, (J.g-') 234.2 273.6 206.4 293.9 215.5 190.0 213.4 237.8 238.5 236.7 195.9
Reference Data MP ("C) H, (J.g-')
28.2 32.1 36.8 40.5 53.7 65.4 81.4 85.3
241.21 170.62 247.32 160.83 163.72 162.7 234.1 237.1
62
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
zation of substances which do not show one during melting. The heating rate /3 has a strong influence on the appearance of the secondary peaks. They may disappear at heating rates /3= 10 K/min (and faster) or may be reduced to a shoulder upon the lower temperature flanks of either the fusion or the crystallization peak. It is not known why no secondary peak has been observed with n-alkanes having carbon numbers below C,, or above C4,,. The graph of the heats of fusion versus the carbon number of the n-alkanes does not follow any systematic course (Fig. 3-46). This is also confirmed by the literature references. The differences between the heats of fusion and the heats of crystallization, which should be characteristic for the entropy part, scatter unsystematically, so they cannot be correlated with the carbon numbers of the n-alkanes. The values found for such differences are in the range from 2.3 to 5 J . g-' coi-responding to 890 to 2 750 J . Mole-'. The low temperature behavior of high-density polyethylenes (laboratory products), possessing a minimum of carbon chain branching ( < 1 CH, groups per 1 000 C-atoms) has been examined. The polyethylenes may be regarded as long chain nonvolatile n-alkanes. The DSC tests reveal a very small increase of the melting temperature of the crystallites due to increasing molecular weight. (Table 3-12). An increase of the molecular weight by a factor of 100, effects only a rise of the crystallite melting point temperature of less than 10 "C. The heat of fusion Hf remains more or less constant with Hf=240 J . g-l. This value indicates a crystallinity of 80 %. The heat of fusion of HD-PE possessing 100 % crystallinity is known to be approximately 300 J . g-l. The influence of chain branching on the melting temperature of the crystallites and on the heat of fusion is very strong, as shown by the HD-PE possesssing about 20 CH, groups per 1 000 C-atoms (product No. 2 in Table 3-12). The maximum energy resorption for pyrolysis (depolymerization) will be found at a
10
20
30
Fig. 3-46: Heat of Fusion of n-Alkanes Data from References [3-10, 3-11]
40
50
60
3.2 Differential Scanning Calorimetry on Model Substances
63
Table 3-12: DSC of High Density Polyethylenes Atmosphere: 1 bar Argon, Flow Rate 5 cm3/min Heating Rate p= 10 K/min Mean Molecular Weight Mw ~~
C-Number
Branching CH, per 1000 C
MP ("C)
H, (J.g-')
Pyrolysis Peak ("C)
385 420 1070 4 300 10 520 16 260 27 740
< I 20 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1
123.2 112.2 125.8 126.5 127.5 130.0 130.6
240 130 220 242 238 248 245
479.2 479.3 481.3 478.7 478.7 480.8 479.8
~
5 400 5 900 15 000 60 270 147 300 227 650 388 400
temperature of about 480 "C. This temperature is not a function of the carbon chain length (molecular weight). The aromatics tested displayed melting temperatures somewhat lower than the values from the references (Table 3-10). The average of the deviations amounts to -2.2 %.
3.2.2 DSC in an oxidizing atmosphere Oxidation experiments in air result in the same phenomena as the analogous experiments using thermogravimetry. Low boiling substances will partially or completely evaporate in the gas flow, prior to the starting of oxidation. The oxidation reaction is characterized by the appearance of several exothermic peaks in the diagram of heat flow versus temperature (Fig. 3-47). These peaks are analogous to the DTG peaks in TGA oxidation tests and were found in similar temperature ranges. As mentioned earlier, the evaporation will shift to higher temperatures due to increasing pressure. However, the starting temperature of the oxidation will decrease at increasing air pressure because the partial pressure of oxygen is increased. This permits the analysis of the oxidation behavior, especially of the blends containing lower boiling compounds. Therefore most of the oxidation tests described in this book were performed at higher air pressure. In particular, the oxidation tests on lubricants were carried out at an air pressure of 7 bar corresponding to 100 psig so that they may be compared with English-language literature references. Fig. 3-47 and Fig. 3-48 represent the behavior of n-hexacontane during the tests at 1 bar and lobar air pressure. The endothermic fusion peak at approximately 100°C is not influenced by the increase of pressure. On the other hand, the exothermic oxidation peaks were shifted to lower temperatures. The first peak (low-temperature oxidation LTO) moves from 241 "C at 1 bar to 221 "C at 10 bar. In the range of fuel deposition, the peak at 334 "C (1 bar) disappears almost completely and may be recognized only in the shoulder of the LTO peak at 300 "C (10 bar). Also, the sharp peak present at 407 "C (1 bar) disappears,
64
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
426,67
'C
443.33
'C
241. 4S°C
-40
,
0
loo
200
300
I
I
500
400
600
7 0
Temperature (OC)
Fig. 3-47: DSC of n-Hexacontane Atmosphere: Air, 5 cm3/min, 1 bar Heating Rate p: 10 K/min
whereas the peak at 443 "C (1 bar) is shifted to 432 "C (10 bar). The rounded fuel combustion peak at 499 "C (1 bar) moves to 488 "C (10 bar). In tests on the higher boiling members of the homologous series of n-alkanes from n-triacontane up to n-hexacontane, two strong peaks are found which are easy to evaluate. These peaks are the LTO peak and the peak in the fuel combustion range. In the range of fuel deposition more than one peak appears. Evaluation of the numerous small peaks is problematic and rarely valuable. Evaluation is normally limited to one or two well-defined peaks. The peak temperatures of eight n-alkanes (C30H62, C3,H66,C36H74,C38H78, C4,H,,, C,,Hg0, C50H,02, C6@122)measured in experiments using the same heating rates (p= 5 , 10, 20, 50 K/min), the same air pressure and flow rates are estimated to be equal, as demonstrated by the low coefficients of variation: Peak Temperatures of n-Alkanes (measured at p= 10 K/min)
Peak 1 Low Temperature Oxidation Peak 2 Fuel Deposition Peak 3 Fuel Combustion
Mean x ("C)
Coefficient of Variation k V ( % )
223.59 292.68 482.14
1.56 1.68 0.91
3.2 Differential Scanning Calorimetry on Model Substances
65
60
-40
0
200
100
300 400 Temperature (OC)
500
600
5 0
Fig. 3-48: DSC of n-Hexacontane Atmosuhere: Air. 5 cm3/min. 10 bar Heat& Rate p : '10 K/min
The onset temperature of the first peak, characterizing the start of the oxidation reaction, may be considered to be equal within the limits of tolerance:
V = f 1.09 %
Tonset: X = 181.88 "C
The HD polyethylenes which may be regarded as long chain n-alkanes exhibit the same behavior. Their peak temperatures under analogous experimental conditions (at 7 bar) are somewhat higher, however the scattering is very small and independent of molecular weight: Peak Temperatures of HD Polyethylenes ~
~
~
Peak 1 Low Temperature Oxidation Peak 2 Fuel Deposition Peak 3 Fuel Combustion
~
~
~
Mean X ( "C)
Coefficient of Variation f V (%)
232.81 300.06 485.00
1.12 0.90 1.10
Even the presence of a double bond in a longer carbon chain does not result in a marked change of the peak temperatures. The test on 1-octadecene supplies the following peak temperatures @= 10 K/min; air 7 bar, 5 cm3/min):
66
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
peak 1 215.0 'C; peak 2 306.25 "C, peak 3 485.12 "C. Compounds containing more double bonds behave differently. The oxidation of polybutadiene yields temperatures for peak 1 of only 156 "C (onset temperature 127.5 "C), for the second (evaluable) peak of 348 "C and for the last peak of 439 "C. These results confirm the sensitivity to oxidation of highly unsaturated compounds. Aromatics behave with more stability against oxidation. Therefore higher onset temperatures and higher peak temperatures were found (Table 3-13). The low temperature and the fuel cornbustion ranges each exhibit one distinct peak. The fuel deposition range is characterized by more than one peak. Frequently two of them may be evaluated. 9, 10Dihydroanthracene exhibits exceptional behavior with an oxidation starting temperature (onset temperature) as low as 125 O C , and the LTO peak maximum temperature as low as 164 "C. Interruption of the aromatic system due to hydrogenation in the 9, 10-position markedly reduces the oxidation stability. The alkyl-substituted pyrenes clearly reveal lower onset temperatures too, but the peak maximum temperatures of the LTO peak are only a little lower than the corresponding temperatures of the unsubstituted pyrene. This indicates the lower oxidation stability of the alkyl substituents. However the last peak (fuel combustion) of the alkylpyrenes appears at a considerably higher temperature than the corresponding peak of the pyrene, which only exhibits two evaluable oxidation peaks. Several attempts have been made to prove that the last peak of the oxidation experiment represents the combustion of deposited carbon. For that purpose the oxidation of graphite and activated carbon (charcoal) has been analyzed. When testing graphite by means of DSC no oxidation maximum could be achieved in the temperature range available. The upper temperature limit of the DSC instrument is 625 "C or 650 "C maximum, Checking by means of STA results in DTG and DTA maximum temperatures of 832 "C (p= 10 K/min; Table 3-13: DSC Oxidation of Aromatics Atmosphere: Air, 7 bar, 5 cm3/min Heating Rate p = 10 K/min Substance onset ("C) Anthracene 9,lO-Diphenylanthracene 9,lO-Dihydroanthracene Phenanthrene Pyrene 3-Methylpyrene 4-Methylpyrene Pentylpyrene n-Hexylpyrene Triphenylene Coronene 1,3,5-Triphenylbenzene Triphenylmethane I, 1,2,2-Tetraphenylethylene
266 315 125 254 300 232 278 248 247 340 263 336 205 325
Peak 1 Maximum ("C) 285 364 164 255 308 285 307 294 294 349 328 376 248 334
Peak 2 ("C)
Peak 3 ("C) -
-
-
429 383 383 386 433 420 430 419 422 429 440 381 429
499 486
226 -
-
284 -
Peak4 ("C)
-
558 48 1 530 539 499 533 -
488 -
3.2 Differential Scanning Calorimetry on Model Substances
67
air 1 bar, 30 + 20 cm3/min). However, the test on charcoal by means of DSC @= 10 K/ min; air 1 bar, 5 cm3/min) results in a peak maximum temperature of only 567 "C. The structure of the surface of the sample influences the reactivity and thus the temperature of the peak maximum. Therefore, determination of the temperature of the last peak maximum does not give any positive evidence concerning the nature of the substance oxidized at that point. Even integration of the last peak does not offer any help. A heat of combustion will be supplied in J . g-l. But this value is related to the starting weight and not to the weight of substance reacting in the fuel deposition range and is therefore too small. An attempt to ascertain the weight of substance at corresponding temperatures with the help of thermogravimetry, in order to correct the data of the integration, results in very different data for the heats of reaction. This may be demonstrated by the example of three HD-PE (measured at p= 10 K/min and 7 bar airpressure). ~
HD-PE M,
Heat of Combustion of the last Peak (kJ . g-l)
5 400 5 900 15 000
14.68 5.82 22.31
Reference [3-131 supplies different data for the heats of combustion of carbon: Heat of Combustion (W. g-l) Graphite High Temperature Coke Charcoal
32.8 33.3 31.2 - 34.0
The heat of combustion of charcoal measured by DSC amounts to much lower values depending on the air pressure in the DSC cell (tests in air, flow rate 5 cm3/min; p= 10 K/
min): DSC Oxidation of Charcoal
1 10 20
487 436 420
567 511 484
15.2 18.3 19.4
The decrease of the temperatures and the increase of the heat of combustion are evidently caused by the increase in the partial pressure of oxygen. Oxidation kinetics will be treated in chapter 3.3.2.
68
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
3.3 Reaction kinetics 3.3.1 Theoretical basis The kinetics of the reactions which take place during the heating of the samples may be analyzed using thermoanalytical methods. The relation of the reaction rate to the temperature is described by the Arrhenius equation: --E
k =A e
where
R.T
k A E R T
= = = = =
Eq. 3-7
(Inin-') constant of reaction (rate) or specific rate constant frequency (pre exponential) factor activation energy universal gas constant absolute temperature
mid mid J . M01-l J . Mol-' . K-' K
Division of the natural logarithm, In 2, by the reaction constant supplies the half life time, t1,2,of the reaction at the temperature T: t,/2=
In 2 k
Eq. 3-8
The differential daldt of the conversion a with respect to the reaction time t at a constant temperature T is given in equation 3-9:
Eq. 3-9
a>" where
a = fractional conversion t = time k = specific rate constant n = reaction order
dimensionless min min-' dimensionless
For the instrumentation described in chapter 2, commercial software exists for the evaluation of reaction kinetics on the basis of four methods: - ASTM E 698-79 - Borchardt and Daniels - Flynn and Wall - McCarty and Green The methods according to ASTM E 689-79, and to Borchardt and Daniels apply data from DSC or DTA test runs, whereas the methods according to Flynn and Wall, and to McCarty and Green are based upon the use of data from thermogravimetry. For the
3.3 Reaction Kinetics
69
evaluations according to ASTM E 698-79 and Flynn and Wall, the data of at least three test runs is needed, whereas the methods according to Borchardt and Daniels and to McCarty and Green require the data from only one test run each. The principles of these methods are described below.
3.3.1.1 Method according to ASTM E 698-79 The ASTM E 698-79 Method [3-141, based upon the investigations of Kissinger, Uricheck, and Ozawa [3-15 to 3-18] measures peak maximum temperature variations with changes in the linear programmed DSC heating rate p. At least three experimental runs have to be executed at different heating rates (between 1 and 20 K/min). The resulting relation of the shift of the peak maximum to the actual heating rate is used to compute the kinetic constants. The calculation makes three basic assumptions: - The peak maximum temperatures represent a point of constant conversion for each heating rate. - The temperature dependence of the reaction rate constant obeys Arrhenius’ equation. - The reaction is of first order. Each of these assumptions can be expressed mathematically:
Eq. 3-10 where
E R
p T,
= = = =
activation energy universal gas constant heating rate peak maximum temperature
J . Mol-’ J . M01-l . K-’ K . min-l K
The solution of Eq. 3-10 is obtained by measuring the slope of log Pversus 1/T, plot (Fig. 3-49) representing the value of E/R, followed by an iterative computer calculation to refine the value for the activation energy E . The second assumption is expressed by Eq. 3-7. To fulfil the third assumption the exponent in equation 3-9 must have the value n = 1. The pre-exponential factor A is then calculated from equation 3-11:
Eq. 3-11 Where: T and pare obtained from a midrange heating rate.
70
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
\
1.2
>'
\\ \ \
1.1-
"\
0a
* 8 sW 5
k,
1.0-
-\,
x.
0.B-
-. '\
\
\
0.9-
\
\
b
0.7-
0.6'
.
I
8
I
-
I
-
I
.
The alternative method for calculating the activation energy according to ASTM E 69879 (part X3) is preferred for a numerical solution, because the value of E requires only one calculation step with no iterations:
Eq. 3-12 All the experiments carried out using the DuPont 990 Thermal Analyzer have been evaluated by applying equation 3-12.
3.3.1.2 Method according to Borchardt and Daniels The Borchardt and Daniels method [3-191 permits the calculation of activation energy E, frequency (pre-exponential) factor A, heat of reaction AH, and order of reaction II from a single DSC or DTA scan of a reaction isotherm. In principle it relies on a comparison between a partial area and the total area of an exothermic peak (Fig. 3-50). This will
3.3 Reaction Kinetics
1
I
8)
T
Y
71
\’-
Ho
TEMPERATURE ~
~~
~
~~
~~
Fig. 3-50: Reaction Kinetics according to Borchardt and Daniels r3-201
preclude the evaluation of endothermic pyrolysis peaks, however this disadvantage can be overcome by reversing the positions of the sample pan and the empty (reference) pan in the instrument and thus simulating an exothermic reaction. The method assumes that the reaction follows nth order kinetics i. e. obeys the relationship:
Eq. 3-13
d d d t = k(n (1-a)”(s-~) Where:
a
fractional conversion k(T, = specific rate constant at temperature T (reaction constant) n = reaction order =
dimensionless s-l
dimensionless
Further, the method assumes that the temperature dependence of the reaction follows Arrhenius’ equation k(n = A ’ exp (-E/R ’ r ) Where: A = frequency (pre-exponential) factor E = activation energy R = universal gas constant T = absolute temperature
Eq. 3-7 S-1
J . Mol-’ J . Mol-’ . K-’ K
Taking logarithms of equation 3-7 yields:
Eq. 3-14
72
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
A plot of In k,, versus 1/ T (Arrhenius plot) should be a straight line. The activation energy and the frequency factor can be obtained from the slope and the intercept respectively. Substituting equation 3-7 into equation 3- 13 yields: d d d t = A . exp(-E/R . T ) .
Eq. 3-15
Taking logarithms of equation 3-15 yields: ln(da/dt) = In A - E/R . T + n . In( 1-a) Eq. 3-16 Equation 3-16 may be solved with a multiple linear regression. The measured DSC (DTA) curve is used to derive the two basic parameters da/dt and a, required to solve equation 3-15. The reaction rate is obtained by dividing the peak height (dH/dt) at temperature T by the total heat of reaction AH,: daldt = (dH/dt)/AHo Where:
Eq. 3-17
AHo= the total peak area (theoretical enthalpy)
The fractional conversion a is obtained by measuring the ratio of the partial area AHT (from reaction start up to the temperature 7) to the total peak area AH,:
a= MT/AH@
Eq. 3-18
3.3.1.3 Method according to Flynn and Wall The Flynn and Wall method [3-21, 3-22] uses the thermogravimetric curves to calculate the activation energy E and the frequency (pre-exponential) factor A of the Arrhenius' equation. In this approach the TGA curve of the analysed material is recorded from at least three test runs at heating rates p between 1 and 20 K/min. The corresponding temperatures of selceted constant conversion levels are determined for each test run (Fig. 3-51). The measured values of temperature and heating rate are then used to compute the activation energy E using the method of successive approximations: Eq. 3-19 Where:
E = activation energy R = universal gas constant
P =
heating rate
T = temperature at selected weight loss b = empirical approximation whose value depends upon E
J . M01-l J . M01-l. K-' K . min-'
K
73
3.3 Reaction Kinetics
I
c
.4
-
.3
-
.2
-
.l
100 -
90 -
YI
u 80
-
.u
; > 0
U L
- 0.0
(u
n
b . , i
x
70 -
60
-
50
-
-
-.l
-
-.2
- -.3
'-
I
ion
3b0
400
-
-.4
-
-.5
--r--1-7--1500 600 700 800 300
Deg C
Fig. 3-51: Reaction Kinetics according to Flynn and Wall [3-21, 3-22] Pyrolysis of CaC,O, . H,O Atmosphere: Argon, 30 + 20 cm3/min, 1 bar Heating Rates p: 5, 10, and 20 K/min
The frequency (pre-exponential) factor A is then calculated based upon the assumption of reaction order of unity (n = 1) by the method of Zsako and Zsako [3-231:
-p
A=R
Where:
ln(1-a) C
-
= frequency (pre-exponential) factor a = fractional conversion
A
Eq. 3-20 mid dimensionless
C = empirical approximation whose value depends upon E The values of E and A are used to calculate the other kinetic parameters such as specific rate constant (reaction constant) k and half life time tl,2 with the help of equations 3-7 and 3-8: The Flynn and Wall method is well-suited to demonstrate the dependence of activation energy and frequency (pre-exponential) factor upon the conversion level.
14
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
3.3.1.4 Method according to McCarty and Green The McCarty and Green method [3-24, 3-25] only requires a single thermogram (TGA curve). The thermogravimetric analysis curve is assumed to be a continuous function such that, to each point on the curve there corresponds a temperature T and a level of conversion
c
c = LIL,
Eq. 3-21
Where:
L = instantaneous weight loss L, = final weight loss If the reaction follows a simple nth order rate law and the temperature dependence of the rate constant is described by Arrhenius' equation the thermogravimetric loss rate is given by the slope equation:
dC1dT = (Alp) exp(-EIR . T) (1 - C)" Where T = absolute temperature A = frequency (pre-exponential) factor P = heating rate E = activation energy R = universal gas constant n = reaction order
Eq. 3-22
K min-' K . min-' J . M01-l J . M01-l . K-' dimensionless
Integration of equation 3-22, treating the parameters A, E, and n as constants, yields:
Where: x =Ell? . T p(x)= exponential temperature integral function p(x) is usually approximated by using a series expansion containing enough terms to achieve the desired degree of accuracy. Taking logarithms of equation 3-23 yields: In F(C) = ln(AE1PR) + In P(X)
Eq. 3-24
Differentiating equation 3-24 with respect to x yields: d In F(C) d In p(x) --
dx
dx
Eq. 3-25
Recalling that dxldT"= E/R, the chain rule may be applied to equation 3-25: Eq. 3-26
3.3 Reaction Kinetics
15
A plot of In F(C) versus 1/T yields the required slope d In F(C)/d T'.This curve is nearly linear over the temperature intervals normally encountered in thermogravimetric decomposition analysis. Equation 3-26 is not a direct solution for the activation energy because d In p(x)/dx is a funciton of E as well as of T. However by choosing a trial value of x (e. g. 40) a first approximation of E can be calculated using equation 3-26. Better values of E are then obtained by iteration of the same equation. The frequency (pre-exponential) factor A can be derived directly from equation 3-23 at each data point once E is known.
3.3.2 Kinetic investigations on model substances 3.3.2.1 DSC experiments according to ASTM E 698-79 heat of vaporization of n-alkanes Pyrolysis experiments in an inert atmosphere on the series of n-alkanes reveal that even those with the longest carbon chains and thus the highest molecular weights evaporated more or less completely in the flow of argon (at 1 bar pressure) (see chapter 3.2.1) [3-121. Experiments performed at different heating rates demonstrate the expected shift of the peak
-0. BO 250
300
360
400
450
Temparatura (*C>
Fig. 3-52: DSC in Argon of Bitumen B 80 Shift of Peak Temperatures at Different Heating Rates p (5, 10, and 20 K/min)
500
76
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
maximum temperatures depending upon the heating rates (Fig. 3-52). The dependence of the peak maximum temperatures upon the carbon number of the n-alkanes at four different heating rates has already been described (Fig. 3-41). the shift of peak temperatures in relation to the heating rates permits the formal calculation of the activation energy E and the frequency (pre-exponential) factor A for each of the tested n-alkanes. This may be done using ASTM E 698-79 because, in the plot of the logarithm heating rate p verusus 1/T, the values fall in a straight line. The graph of the activation energy found thus versus the carbon number of the n-alkanes shows a logarithmic function similar to that already described in chapter 3.1.2 for the dependence of the peak temperature upon the carbon number: E = a, ln(C + a,)
+ a3
Eq. 3-1
The correlation coefficient is very high Y = 0.9997 (Fig. 3-53). Apart from the low level of the values for E, the shape of the curve contradicts the existence of an activation energy for a pyrolysis reaction. According to the references, the curve of the activation energy of a pyrolysis reaction versus the carbon number decreases asymptotically, starting from C2H6, and attains a final limit of approximately 250 kJ/Mol with n-C,,H,,. A curve of such a shape will be attained if the activation energies are divided by the corresponding molecular weights, resulting in the dimension of kJ/kg (energy per unit weight). The plot of those
160 140 120 100
BO 60
40 20 0
0
10
20
30
40
50
Fig. 3-53: DSC Kinetics (ASTM E 698-79) of n-Alkanes in Argon Activation Energy E versus C-Numbers Atmosphere: Argon 5 cm3/min, 1 bar
60
70
3.3 Reaction Kinetics
77
Heat o f Vaporization (kJ/kg) -01
- \ 500
400
30 0
200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Fig. 3-54: Heat of Vaporization H , of n-Alkanes versus C-Numbers Curve 1: Data according to R. C. Weast [3-101 [3-261 Curve 2: Data according to API Curve 3: Data from DSC-Tests in 1 bar Argon
values versus the carbon numbers gives an elongation of the curve of the heat of vaporization according to reference data, which have so far been listed only up to n-C,,H,, (Fig. 3-54). Comparison of the curve derived from DSC data with the curve derived from DTG data according to ASTM E 698-79 shows that identical values are found using both methods of measurement (Fig. 3-55). The deviation at carbon-numbers < 12 is caused by uncertainties in the determination of the DTG maximum temperatures for low-boiling substances. Increase of the pressure of the inert gas from 1 to 10 bar at constant flow rates causes a rise of the peak maximum temperatures. A strong linear correlation exists between temperature and pressure (Fig. 3-56): TIObar= 0.9188 Tlbe+74.576
Eq. 3-27
The correlation is very good: r = 0.9951. Therefore a linear correlation also exists between the values of the activation energy (heat of vaporization) at 1 bar to those at 10 bar pressure (Fig. 3-57): Elobar= 1.3105 Elbar+ 30.142 with correlation: r = 0.9998
Eq. 3-28
78
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
320 300 280
260 240 220 200
180 160
.
20 30 40 Fig. 3-55: Heat of Vaporization H, of n-Alkanes Curve 1: DSC-Tests Curve 2: DTG-Tests Evaluation according to ASTM E 698-79 10
50
60
70
80C
70C
600
500
400
300
200
Fig.3-56: DCS Tests of n-Alkanes 100
0 0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Peak Temperatures at 1 and 10 bar Pressure Atmosphere: Argon, 5 cm3/min Heating Rate p: 10 K/min
3.3 Reaction Kinetics
79
/
Elbar A r (kJ/Mol)
___t
0' 0
I 40
80
120
Fig. 3-57: DCS Kinetics of n-Alkanes (ASTM E 698-79) Activation Energy E at 10 bar Pressure (Methane) versus E at 1 bar Pressure (Argon) Gas Flow Rate: Argon, 5 cm3/min Heating Rate p : 10 K/min
The graph of activation energy E versus carbon number displays curves of logarithmic functions displaced parallel (fig. 3-58): In E , bar= 0.6677 In C + 2.220 r = 0.9975
Eq. 3-29
In Elobar= 0.5330 In C + 3.218 r = 0.9978
Eq. 3-30
80
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
E (kJ/Mol)
o
l
C-Number 10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Fig. 3-58: Activation Energy E versus C-Numbers of n-Alkanes DSC Kinetics Atmosphere: Argon, 5 cm3/min Curve 1: 1 bar Pressure Curve 2: 10 bar Pressure
The relation of activation energy per unit weight Hv(kJ/kg) versus C number is shown in Fig. 3-59, which also shows that the values of the coefficient and exponent of the exponential function at 10 bar pressure are twice the values at 1 bar:
HvI bar = 322.159 exp(-O.Ol 11 7 C)
Eq. 3-31
r = 0.9912 E*lObar= 679.528 exp(-0.0200 C) r = 0.9833
Eq. 3-32
3.3 Reaction Kinetics
81
1000
800
600
400
200
C-Number 0 0
I
t
10
20
30
40
-
I
50
60
70
Fig. 3-59: Heat of Vaporization H, versus C-Numbers of n-Alkanes Atmosphere: Argon, 5 cm3/min Curve 1: 1 bar Pressure Curve 2: 10 bar Pressure
In principle the enthalpy of vaporization may obtained by integration of the peak area in the curve of heat flow versus temperature. This mathematical calculation will not be precise, since the baseline drifts a certain amount due to the change of the specific heat during the heating. In addition the baseline does not return to the same level after the reaction due to mass loss during the reaction. Exact determination of the integration limits is therefore difficult, especially with the multicomponent systems (petroleum and its products) described below. Theoretically the enthalpy of vaporization is independent of the heating rate. In practice it is not independent, but shows a variable increase at increasing heating rates. However, the maximum temperatures of the evaporation peaks do shift depending on the heating rates. This fact permits the calculation of the activation energy of the evaporation process, which does not exhibit any temperature dependence. Theoretical considerations lead to the conclusion that this activation energy is equal to the molar enthalpy of vaporization.
82
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
3.3.2.2 Pyrolysis kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79 Most of the members of the series of n-alkanes evaporate in the DSC experiment at atmospheric as well as at 10 bar cell pressure due to the gas flow. Decrease of the gas flow rate from 5 to 1 or 2 cm3/min causes a true pyrolysis reaction for the higher n-alkanes, starting at about n-C,,Hs2. This may recognized by the fact, that the peak maximum temperatures of the n-alkanes tested, from n-C40Hs,up to n-C6,HIz2no longer differ at the corresponding heating rates but approach a mean value. However the variations from this mean value are very small, thus enabling the calculation by statistics of mean values for the activation energy E and the frequency factor logA (Table 3-14). A pyrolysis reaction, starting with n-C,,H,, may be achieved if the experiments are carried out using hermetically sealed aluminium pans. However, some of the pans burst during the experiment, giving a wider scattering of data as shown by the coefficient of variation in Table 3-14. The supplier guarantees a pressure stability up to only 3 bar for the hermetically sealed aluminium pans. A model calculation shows why the pans will burst in the experiment despite a surrounding cell pressure of 10 bar: The volume of a hermetically sealed pan is approx. 0.04 cm3.The input is 5 mg n-C,,H,6 corresponding to 0.029 d o l e . The evaporation produces 0.029 . 22.4 = 0.65 cm3 vapor (under normal conditions i. e. 1 bar pressure and 20 "C temperature) corresponding to a pressure rise up to 16.25 bar. Heating from 20 "C up to 500 "C (or 293 and 773 K respectively) increases the pressure by the factor 2.6 giving a pressure of 42 bar (for an ideal gas). Latest during the evaporation of the n-C,,H,, the pan will burst (BP = 216 "C). n-C,,H,, has a molecular weight large enough (282. 53) that the amount of vapor formed from 5 mg results in a pressure increase of only 10 bar. With increasing molecular weight, the volume of gas evolved from a constant weight of substance decreases asymptotically as does the pressure inside the pan. In addition from about n-C,,H,, the temperature of evaporation approaches the temperature of pyrolysis. The pyrolysis of HD polyethylenes, which do not evaporate due their molecular size, gives values for the arithmetical means of E and log A which are of the same magnitude as Table 3-14: DSC Pyrolysis of n-Alkanes and HD-Polyethylenes Statistical Evaluation -
X
n-Alkanes (C,,H,, to C60H122) 10 bar open pans n-AIkanes (C20H42to C6,H12,) 10 bar sealed pans HD-Polyethylenes 1 bar, open pans HD-Polyethylenes 10 bar, open pans HD-Polyethylenes 10 bar, sealed pans
E (W/Mol) 1 V (%)
-
X
logA (min-') +V (%)
246.2
4.64
17.6547
3.52
241.2
6.50
17.0272
5.62
248.0
2.81
17.0544
2.48
255.5
2.49
17.4947
3.14
245.3
7.53
16.2904
1.57
3.3 Reaction Kinetics
83
the values for n-alkanes with shorter carbon chains, and which are independent of the molecular weight (A4from 5 000 up to 388 000) (Table 3-14). Experiments using pressure resistant capsules (mini-autoclaves supplied by Bodenseewerk Perkin-Elmer GmbH) were not successful, becaue the heat capacity of the relatively Table 3-15: DSC Pyrolysis of Aromatics Substance
Anthracene 2-Methylanthracene 9-Methylanthracene 9,lO-Dimethylanthracene 9,lO-Diphenylanthracene 9,lO-Dihydroanthracene Phenanthrene 2-Methylphenanthrene Fluoranthene Pyrene 3-Methylpyrene 4-Methylpyrene Pentylpyrene n-Hexy lpyrene Coronene Triphenylene 1,2,5-Triphenylbenzene Triphenylrnethane p-Terphenyl
Open Pans 10 bar Methane E (kJ/Mol) log A (min-') 119.7 112.9 107.6 192.5 156.7 118.3 100.8 79.7 125.0 115.8 123.4 135.5 146.0 156.9 182.6 210.8 152.6 132.9
10.7958 10.4146 10.7203 17.5132 12.0777 11. 6848 9.1199 7.0810 10.9722 9.4749 10.2975 1I. 1242 12.4783 13.3390 12.7002 17.6870 11.9442 12.3585
Sealed Pans 10 bar Methane E (M/Mol) log A (min-')
207.4
12.5110
327.7 275.0
24.2467 19.7889
857.2 418.2
64.6681 26.4214
255.2 195.8"
19.9254 12.1465"
*Experiments in Mini-Autoclave Table 3-16: Gas Phase Pyrolysis of Aromatics (Literature Data) Substance Benzene Naphthalene Anthracene Phenanthrene Fluorene Toluene p-Xylene rn-Xylene o-Xylene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Ethylbenzene Propylbenzene Styrene Biphenyl
Temperature Range ("C)
E (kJ/Mol)
log A (min-l)
800-870 800-875 785-825 835-920
468 446 529 452 120 3 15 322 354 315 37 1 221 311 142 384
21.517 20.579 25.026 20.436 6.437 14.868 16.066 17.231 15.954 18.153 13.224 18.429 6.971 18.149
790-890
560-660 570-635 650-720 750-850
84
3 Thermal AnaZysis on Model Substances
heavy mini-autoclaves is too large compared to the amount of heat evolved by the reaction of 5 mg substance. Aromatics evaporate (sublimate) similarly to n-alkanes in the flow of inert gas even at 10 bar cell pressure. (Table 3-15). The values of the activation energy ascertained are ordinarily too low to represent apyrolysis reaction, as shown by comparison with reference data (Table 3-16). The use of hermetically sealed pans gave valid data for only a few substances. It is dubious whether the data in Table 3-15 are true values of the activation energy and the frequency factor from pyrolysis reactions. For example, activation energy E for phenanthrene according to the literature is twice the value found by the experiment using sealed pans. Similarly, the value for triphenylmethane (E = 255 W/Mol) is markedly lower than the reference value ( E = 347 W/Mol). However the values ascertained for the two methylpyrenes are in the order of magnitude of other alkane-substituted aromatics. The decomposition temperatures of unsubstituted aromatics fall within such a range, that most will exceed the upper temperature limit of the DSC instrumentation. The aromatic ring systems are very stable to decomposition due to resonance. The free bonding enthalpy (-AGJ of the aromatic C-C bond amounts to 402 kJ/Mol and that of the aromatic C-H bond to 427 W/Mole [3-271. The bonding enthalpies for the aliphatic side chain of an aromatic ring (335 kJ/Mol) and the aliphatic C-C bond (297 kJ/Mol) are somewhat weaker. These differences are also reflected in the activation energies, which for the pyrolysis of an unsubstituted aromatic ring amount to more than 450 kJ/Mol; for an alkyl-substituted aromatic ring system E amounts to 320-370 kJ/Mol and for an aliphatic chain (C number I20) to 240-250 kJ/Mol. Experiments on aromatics were discontinued because the use of mini-autoclaves gave widely scattered data and also the upper temperature limit of the instrumentation (650 "C maximum) is too low for pyrolysis experiments on aromatics.
3.3.3 DSC oxidation kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79 Although oxidation is not a first order type of reaction, it has been found experimentally that it can be treated mathematically as a first order reaction with regard to the consumption of fuel, provided that there is an excess of air (oxygen). As already discussed the DSC experiment in air always exhibits three or four measurable peaks in the curve of energy flow versus temperature, which correspond at their peak maximum temperatures to the different reaction steps. They all shift to higher temperatures with increasing heating rates. That permits the calculation of the activation energy E and the frequency factor logA according to ASTM E 698-79 for each of the reaction steps. The first peak (Low Temperature Oxidation LTO) and the last peak (Fuel Combustion) can usually be evaluated without difficulty. In the region of fuel deposition it is often difficult to correlate the corresponding peaks to the different heating rates. Sometimes that can only be done manually by trial and error. This involves fitting as many data points as possible (at least three values), in the plot
85
3.3 Reaction Kinetics
of logarithm of heating rate Pversus 1 OOO/T, to a straight line. This regression line does not always give correct values of the kinetic parameters. That statement is also valid for the calculations using the data of the first or the last oxidation peaks, and generally for all methods of calculation, which use the diagram log Pversus 1 000/T for the calculation of E. The slope of the regression line log P= f(l O O O / r ) represents the value of EIR. The value of E is obtained by multiplication by the numerical value of R, (8.314 J . Mol-'. K-I). This may imply larger divergences of the value of E due to small deviations of the slope of the regression line. Instead of using the convenient computer program to calculate the regression line, it is advisable to repeat one of the experimental runs or to carry out further runs at additional heating rates, until the regression line in the plot log P= f(l OOO/T) easily fits at least three data points. The n-alkanes with shorter carbon chains evaporate prior to the start of the oxidation reaction as already discussed for the TGA oxidation experiments. Valid measurement is possible beginning with n-triacontane even at elevated air pressure inside the cell. The temperature data of the onset points of the first oxidation peak and the peak maximum temperatures of the n-alkanes from n-C,,H6, up to n-C6,H1,, show little deviation from an average value at each heating rate, as the small coefficient of variation shows (V= f 3 % maximum). Therefore the arithmetic means of the temperatures may be used to compute the activation energy E and the frequency factor log A (Table 3-17). However the restrictions for the Fuel Deposition Range mentioned above still apply. The mean of the oxidation start temperature (first onset point) is approx. 182 "C. The mean of the maximum temperatures of the first peak representing the LTO is 224 "C (both values at a heating rate P= 10 K/min and 7 bar air pressure). The experiments on HD-polyethylenes also give onset and peak maximum temperatures with a very small spread, so the kinetic parameters may be calculated using this mean values (Table 3-17). The mean of the onset point temperatures is found at 184 OC; the mean of the maximum temperature of the first peak at 232 "C (P= 10 K/min, P = 7 bar). Table 3-17: Oxidation Kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79 of n-Alkanes, HD-Polyethylenes, Naphthenes, and Olefins Atmosphere: Air; Pressure 7 bar Temperature Range
n-Alkanes Mean of 8 different samples HD-Polyethylenes Mean of 7 samples of different molecular weights trans-Decalin 1-Octadecene Polybutadiene
175 . . . 275 280 . . . 350 350 . . . 450 > 450 logA E logA logA E E E logA (kJ/Mol) (min-l) (kJ/Mol) ( m i d ) (kJ/Mol) ( m i d ) (kJ/Mol) ( m i d ) 114.8
11.942
100.6 114.2 116.4 66.8
10.085 116.6 11.787 94.2 12.220 140.6 7.659 86.1
-
-
166.5
10.370
195.9
13.178
10.142 6.812 12.389 6.686
-
-
175.7
11.753
-
-
-
-
-
-
158.6 209.4
10.450 15.158
-
86
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
The inclusion of only one carbon double bond in a longer carbon chain does not decrease the oxidation stability significantly, as the example of 1-octadecene demonstrates (Table 3-17). The onset point has a temperature of 185 OC, the maximum temperature of the first peak is 215 "C. The kinetic parameters of the first oxidation peak are nearly equivalent to those of the n-alkanes. For the second peak the data are higher and for the last peak lower compared to the n-alkanes. The high content of carbon double bonds in polybutadiene causes a considerable decrease in its oxidation stability. The onset point temperature is as low as 117.5 "C and the maximum temperature of the first peak as low as 175 "C. The activation energy of the LTO (first peak) decreases to 66.8 kJ/Mol (Table 3-17). Considerably higher onset point and peak maximum temperatures, as well as higher values of the kinetic parameters E and log A demonstrate the higher oxidation stability of unsubstituted aromatics (Table 3-18). Only coronene does not comply with this series. Substitution on the aromatic ring results in a decrease of the temperatures of the onset point as well as of the first peak maximum. As a result, the activation energy and the frequency factor are also lower. The length of the carbon chain of alkyl-substituted aromatics influences the oxidation behavior: an increase of the length of the alkyl chain causes a decrease in the activation energy and the frequency factor, evident in the alkyl-substituted pyrenes (Table 3-18). The last oxidation peak characterizes the combustion of carbon (Fuel Combustion), which has been formed by pyrolysis reactions in the preceding reaction range (Fuel Deposition). The very different values of the activation energy and the frequency factor for the last peak in Table 3-18 appear illogical. The means of the maximum temperatures of the last peak at a heating rate p= 10 K/min are: for n-alkanes 484 "C, for HD-polyethylenes 485 'C, for 1-octadecene 485 "C, and for polybutadiene 439 "C. For the aromatics the temperatures vary between 48 1 "C (4-methylpyrene) minimum and 558 "C (3-methylpyrene) maximum. Differences in the oxidation behavior of elemental carbon are well-known. In 1962 Levy [3-281 reported an activation energy for commercial grade graphite at 1 bar air pressure of E = 155.6 kJ/Mol and for pyrolytic graphite E = 104.5 kJ/Mol, presumably due to the considerably larger surface of the latter. From experiments on petroleum recovery by in situ combustion Fashihi [3-191 reports a range of values of E from 120 up to 140 kJ/Mol for the last reaction range (Fuel Combustion). In experiments on the oxidation of diesel soot in air [3-291 non-combusted fuel oil has been detected as an inpurity, which was oxidized at relatively low temperatures in a range from 260 "C up to 330 "C, requiring an activation energy of 32 up to 68 kJ/Mol. The soot itself had an ignition temperature of 500 "C up to 600 "C and required an activation energy of E = 154 up to 277 kJ/Mol. Comparative tests using TGA on commercial grade furnace blacks show onset temperatures between 400 "C and 450 "C. A soot with a graphite-like surface show the considerably higher onset temperature of 750 "C. In experiments made by the author on graphite oxidation did not occur because the temperature range did not suffice in the DSC instrumentation at 7 bar air pressure. TGA experiments demonstrate a start temperature of the oxidation (T1 %) for graphite of 650 "C and for activated carbon (charcoal) of 427 "C at 1 bar air pressure (Table 3-19). The
Anthracene 9,lO-Diphenylanthracene 9,lO-Dihydroanthracene Phenathrene Pyrene 3-Methylpyrene 4-Methylpyrene Pentylpyrene n-Hexylpyrene Triphenylene Coronene 1,3,5-Triphenybenzene Triphenylmethane 1,1,2,2-Tetraphenylethylene
Substance Tpet (C) 266 315 125 254 300 232 278 248 247 340 263 336 205 325 182.5 108.6 86.6 189.3 162.9 101.6 125.7 68.8 59.8 138.7 118.4 86.7 105.5 132.1
Peak 1 E (kJ/Mol) log A (min-') 17.673 8.437 10.034 18.616 14.411 10.093 11.001 5.697 4.868 11.271 9.873 6.380 10.335 11.006 -
-
-
-
4.890 8.295
-
76.9 93.3 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
13.718
115.9 -
-
-
Peak 2 log A E kJ/Mol) (min-')
Table 3-18: DSC Oxidation Kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79 of Aromatics Atmosphere: Air; Pressure 7 bar
-
12.820 5.672
-
164.7 85.3
-
7.989 8.686 10.993 16.141 7.219 8.136 8.849 9.167 6.094 12.888
-
114.8 115.2 143.0 205.0 105.3 115.1 126.2 128.8 89.6 178.2
Peak 3 E log A (W/Mol) (min-')
-
154.4
-
-
10.100
-
-
8.412 9.286 6.798 8.746 8.308 3.511
128.5 141.6 115.1 145.8 126.6 67.934
-
10.681 11.332 -
165.0 170.9
-
Peak 4 log A (kJ/Mol) (niin-')
E
cu
2
3.
2
;5
Rg.
2
L,
88
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
Table 3-19: Oxidation Kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79 of Elementar Carbon Thermogravimetry
Graphite 1 bar Air
Activated Carbon 1 bar Air
Activated Carbon 7 bar Air
T1 % ("C)* T5 % ("C)* DTG ("C)* E (kJ/Mol)** log A (min-l)**
65 1 724 830 153.4 6.433
427 539 630
-
-
-
-
-
476 592 170.7 9.715
434 544 154.4 9.267
DSC onset point ("C)* DSC-Maximum ("C)* E (kJ/Mol)* log A (mid)* ~
~
-
-
~
* Heating rate /3= 10 K/min ** Values from DTG Maximum Temperatures according to ASTM E 698-79 oxidation kinetics of graphite have therefore been ascertained by evaluation of DTG maximum temperatures according to ASTM E 698-79. Charcoal could be oxidized in the DSC instrumentation at air pressures of 1 bar and 7 bar. Oxidation experiments on different diesel soots in the Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer showed DTG and DTA peak maximum temperatures between 580 "C and 680 "C and onset point temperatures of about 400 and 420 "C [3-201 (p= 10 K/min). Consequently the susceptibility to oxidation of elemental carbon depends strongly upon the history of its origin and of the nature of its surface. If the oxidation test of pure hydrocarbons is interrupted after the second reaction step (Fuel Deposition) then a glossy, black, lacquer-like residue will be found in the sample pan. The oxidation of the latter results in heats of combustion in the region of pure carbon. The susceptibility to oxidation of the coke formed during Fuel Deposition will also be influenced by any residues of the original substances or their conversion products which are still present in the soot. The formation of the deposited carbon in the reaction range Fuel Deposition is a complex process. Conjugated diolefins react at temperatures of 550 "C up to 750 "C forming unsaturated cycloalkenes and aromatics requiring a weak activation energy of only 104 kJ/Mol [3-321. The primary reaction step of the pyrolysis of benzene at a temperature of 700 - 800 "C is the formation of biphenyl. The reaction continues to form pyrene ( E 230 kJ/Mol). The reaction range of Fuel Deposition in DSC lies between the temperature limits 300 450°C. But local higher temperature peaks may exist. The sample temperature often overtakes the programmed instrument temperature just in the range of Fuel Deposition. This could be an indirect proof for the existence of such temperature peaks. At the other end of the scale, polymers form easily aromatics at relatively low temperatures. The polymerization of acenaphthene starts as low as 210 "C [3-331. The biacenaphthylidene formed first, will be converted at about 360 "C to fluorocyclene, which will condense at temperatures > 480 "C to graphite-like aromatic ring systems, after passing through some intermediate stages. The atomic ratio H/C decreases during this process.
-
3.3 Reaction Kinetics
89
This type of reaction is not restricted to oxidation processes but also occuls during pyrolysis in inert gas. However, the temperature peaks were not found during pyrolysis. The multitude of reaction mechanisms possible during the oxidation of multicomponent systems accounts for the appearance of several peaks in the Fuel Deposition reaction range. The number of peaks in this range decreases with increasing heating rates, because some reactions have such a slow reaction rate that they may be overtaken and obscured. The same applies to the effects of increasing pressure, because the reaction rates of different components will also vary.
3.3.4 Kinetics according to Borchardt and Daniels Experiments on model substances were not carried out. A comparison of the oxidation and pyrolysis kinetics according to Borchardt and Daniels with the other three methods will be made in chapter 4.10.
220
I---------’----------
0
Fig. 3-60: Reaction Kinetics according to Flynn and Wall [3-21, 3-22] Pyrolysis of CaC,O,. H,O Atmosphere: Argon, 30 + 20 cm3/min, 1 bar Plot: Activation Energy E versus Conversion
90
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
3.3.5 TGA kinetics according to Flynn and Wall The reactions during the heating of calcium oxalate monohydrate CaC,O,. H,O are shown in Fig. 3-51, where the points of isoconversion at three different heating rates (p= 5, 10, and 20 K/min) are marked and connected by straight lines. According to Flynn and Wall it is possible to calculate the dependence of the activation energy upon the level of conversion (Fig. 3-60). To compare the results with those found by the ASTM E 698-79 method it is useful to evaluate the three regions of reaction separately. The activation energies and the frequency (pre-exponential) factors should be calculated at the conversion levels corresponding to those at the DTA- (DSC-, DTG-) maximum temperatures. In Fig. 3-61 the first reaction region (evaporation of the water of crystallization) is shown ranging from 100 to 88 % weight. The points of isoconversion are connected by straight lines. The plot of In heating rate p versus the temperatures of the points of isoconversion (1 000/Kelvin) shows that the data obtained at different heating rates fit very closely to a straight line at any conversion level (Fig. 3-62). The plot of the activation energy versus percent conversion (Fig. 3-63) shows a descending line. The conversion at the DTG maximum temperature amounts to 7.28 % weight loss. The table of kinetic results
102
.5 .4
loo .3 98
.2 m
U
+I
.1
96
; >
0
0
L
0.0
m
a
h .-I
I
94
-.l -.2
92
-.3 90 -.4
88
Fig. 3-61: Reaction Kinetics (Flynn and Wall) Pyrolysis of CaC,O,. H,O + CaC,O, (First Reaction Step) Conversion: 11.07 % Raw Data Plot of STA 780
-.5
+ H,O?
3.3 Reaction Kinetics
91
Fig. 3-62: Reaction Kinetics (Flynn and Wall) Pyrolysis of CaC,O,. H,O First Reaction Step Plot of STA 780: In Heating Rate versus 1 000/T
(Fig. 3-64) demonstrates an activation energy E = 71.22 H/Mol and a frequency (preexponential) factorA = 2.084 . 108min-' (log A = 8.3189 min-') at a relative conversion of 60 %, corresponding to 7.38 % absolute conversion. The measurement of the other reaction regions may be done in a similar way. A comparison of the values found by the Flynn and Wall method, with the values from the calculation according to ASTM E 698-79, both corresponding to the DTG maximum temperatures, is set out in Table 3-20.
92
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances 95
90
a5
80
75
70
65
60
I
20
I
30
I
1
50
40
-
CONVERPIOM 80 X I RXN OROER 1 I ACTIVATION ENEREY I KJ/mol. 1: PRE-EXPONENTIAL FACTOR Il/mlnl:
I
60
I
I
70
Percent Conversion
2.46
X
C RXN ORDER 3 1 1 COHVERSION: 40 X ACTIVATIOH ENEROY I KJ/mOlm I : 77.06148 PRE-EXPONENTIAL FACTOR I l h i n l : i .7909Cl5E+OP
4.92 I
I RXN ORDER 1 1 CONVERSION: ¶O X ACTIVATION ENERBY I kJ/melo I : PRE-EXPONENTIAL FACTOR 1l/mlnl:
74.46738 S.S71974E+08
6.15 X
C RXN ORDER I 1 1 CONVEREION: 80 X ACTIVATION ENEREV I kJ/nol. I : PRE-EXPONENTIAL FACTOR Il/mlnl:
71.22i?58 2.084L34E+08
CONVERBION: 70 I I RXN ORDER 1 1 ACTIVATXON ENEREY 1 YJ/mol. I: PRE-EXPONENTIAL FACTOR Ll/min):
67.91453 S.SO9329EiO7
I RXN ORDER i 1 CONVEREION: 00 X ACTIVATION ENERDY I k J / m l . I : PRE-EXPONENTIAL FACTOR I l h l n l :
84.84087 2.30089DE+07
-
-
[ RXN ORDER i 1 CONVERSION: 90 X ACTIVATION ENEROV I KJ/moI. 1: 56.9.789 PRE-EXPONENTIAL FACTOR l l h i n l : 33.7291
F i r s t Reaction Step : CaC204. H20 -CaC Theoretical Conversion : 12.3 I OTG Maximum Conversion : 7.28 X
I
100
l.E78114€+10
3.69 I
-
I
90
08.38ma3
CONVERSION ao x RXN ORDER L 1 ACTIVATION ENEROV 1 LJ/moI. 1: 79.65492 PRE-EXPONENTIAL FACTOR I l h i n l : ¶.100S86E~09
-
80
0 + H20t 2 4
7.38
s
8.61
X
9.84
s
11.07 X
Fig. 3-64: Reaction Kinetics (Flynn and Wall) Pyrolysis of CaC,04. H,O First Reaction Step Plot of STA 780: Table of Results
CaC,O,. H,O CaC,O, CaCO,
Reaction
t
t
= CaC,04 + H,O = CaCO, + CO = CaO + CO,
7 7.28 24.92 52.72
71.2 215.0 138.2
8.3189 14.5039 6.7246
Conversion at DTG Flynn and Wall E lo@ Maximum Temperature (%) absolute (k.l/Mol) (min-')
Table 3-20: Decomposition Kinetics of CaC,O,. H,O in Inert Atmospehere
69.0 7.8140 205.1 13.5846 162.2 7.8771
ASTM E 698-79 E logA (kJ/Mol) (min-')
115.38 300.24 287.77
14.0885 20.5942 15.0917
McCarty and Green E logA (kJ/Mol) (fin-')
94
3 Thermal Analysis on Model Substances
3.3.6 TGA kinetics according to McCarty and Green The McCarty and Green method is of economical interest because only one test run is required for the calculation of reaction kmetics. In the evaluation of a decomposition experiment on calcium oxalate monohydrate, the temperatures of the onset and offset points of each of the three consecutive reactions were used as integration limits. The results are shown in Fig. 3-65. These data diverge considerably from those calculated using the Flynn and Wall or the ASTM E 698-79 methods (Table 3-20). Considerable differences in the data are also reported in the literature. Freeman and Carol1 /3-34/ reported the following data found by thermogravimetry: reaction 1: E = 92.1 kJiMol reaction 2: E = 309.8 kJ/Mol reaction 3: E = 163.3 WiMol While they do not report any data from references concerning reactions 1 and 2, they cite varying values from references for reaction 3, the removal of CO, from CaCO, (kJ/Mol): 205.2; 145.5 up to 175.9; 397.8; 171.7 up to 184.2; 154.9 up to 163.3; 201.0. The attraction of this quick evaluation method led to an attempt to calculate the activation energies of evaporation for the series of n-alkanes, but, depending upon the limits of integration chosen, different values showing relatively widespread scattering
-
In Z:
34.75
i/nin
lag 2 : 15.0917
I
1
iOC
200
300
I
430
I
500 rjeg 2
I
600
Fig. 3-65: Reaction Kinetics according to McCarty and Green [3-241 Pyrolysis of CaC,O,. H,O Heating Rate p: 10 K/min
I
7CO
1
ROC
0
3.3 Reactiori Kinetics
95
were found. Dividing the activation energics by the corresponding molecular weights gives the heats of evaporation E+ (in kJ/kg) (see chapter 3.2.2). The following limits of integration were tested: upper limit
lower limit
1OU '3, weight onset point 100 c/c weight onset point
50 '5, weight offset point onset point 70 % wcipht
The point at 70 % weight corresponds to thc transition from the bend to thc linear descending part of thc TGA curve. In all cases values of E* were found which considerably exceed those found by DSC experiments and calculated according to ASTM E 698-79. This is shown in Fig. 3-66 using the cxamplc of data calculated using the integration limits onset point + offset point (crosses) and 100 % weight -+ onset point (circles).
10
20
30
40
50
60
Fig. 3-66: Kinetic of Vaporizalion of n-Alkanes according to McCarty and Green Atmosphere: Argon, 30 + 20 cm3/min, 1 bar Heating Rate p: 10 K/rnin x Integration Limits: Onset Point to Offset Point o Integration Limits: 100 % Weight to Onset Point
Thermal Methods in Petroleum Analysis by. Heinz Kopsch CopyrightoVCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 1995
4 Thermoanaly tical investigations on petroleum and petroleum products
Petroleum is a multicomponent system. With regard to its thermal behavior, it comprises a multitude of compounds ranging from very light components, which even evaporate during the production phase, through to heavy substances which do not evaporate due to their lower decomposition temperature. The distribution of these substances varies between the various oil fields. It is possible to differentiate between light crudes, medium crudes, and heavy crudes, but each consists of many individual compounds. A distillation fraction such as gasoline, with a boiling range of 3.5-200 "C comprises 2.5 isoparaffins, eight n-paraffins, four naphthencs, and five aromatics, as reported by Zerbe 14-11. Thermal refining of the crudes consists of two basic operations i.e. atmospheric and subsequent vacuum distillation. The boiling range of the atmospheric distillates extends to approximately 370 "C and yields the fractions: - liquid petroleum gas (LPG) -
gasoline
- light gas oil - heavy gas oil
Vacuum distillation of the atmospheric residue (temperature approximately 400 "C and 0.1 bar pressure) yields the fractions: -
spindle oil
- machine oil - cylinder oil
The vacuum residue may be used for bitumen heavy fuel oil - bunker C oil (marine diesel fuel) -
The individual components of the light fractions can be separated and defined more or less easily using modern analytical methods; for the high and non boiling fraction it is only possible to separate compounds into groups, characterized by similar analytical behavior. Individual substances can only be isolated in exceptional cases. Investigations concerning the kinctics of the pyrolysis and oxidation behavior of fractions from petroleum refining, will therefore only provide average values from a series of
98
4 Thet-rnouticilvtic,alItiwsligutions on Petroleum mid Petroleicm Products
parallel and consecutive reactions. The practical behavior of the multicomponcnt systems in thermal refinery processes may be satisfactory described by thermal methods of analy sis. Thermogravimetry is well-suited to describe the distillative, cracking, and oxidative behavior of crudes and petroleum products. The thermal behavior may be described
Table 4-1: Index Numhcrs for I'hcrinogravinietry Temperature ("C) at I % weight loss Representative of the start of evaporation (boiling) 'lempcraturc ('C) at S %: weight loss Same meaning as TI %, but better repeatability Weight loss (wt 5%) up to 400 "C Part of' thc sample which may still be separated by means of distillative method\. (Experiments in inert gas) Residue (wt 5%) at 600 "C Coke residue (Experiments in inert gas) IZesidue (wt %) at 800 "C Coke residue (Experiments in inert gas) Maximun~of thc loss (cvaporation, crack) rate (first differential quotient of thc TGA curve with respect to time) related to the weighed portion (%/min or pg/min.mg) Indicates the kinetics of the reaction Tempcraturc ("C) at the peak maximum of the DTG curve. Indicates if the reaction is still in the distillation range Tnnx < 400°C or in the crack range Tmx < 400°C. (Experiments in inert gas). During experiments in air the first DTG maximum may indicate distillation as well as oxidation. Extrapolated temperature ("C) of the point of inflexion (off-set point) of the TGA curve. End of the crack reaction (Experiments in inert gas) Weight ( ~ 1 % of' ) the residue at the tcmperature TW. Coke residue (Experiments in inert gas)
Table 4-2: Derived Index Numbers for Thermogravimetry
ND = 100-AG400
Nondistillable pait of the sample (wt %) (Experiments in inert gas)
CK = 100-(AG400+R800)
Part of the sample which may cracked thermally (wt %) (Experiments i n inert gas)
= ND
R800 ND CR ND
'
100
Conradson coke residue in the non-distillable part of the sample
("/.I
(Experiments in inert gas)
. 100
Residue at 800 "C in the non-distillable part of the sample ('70) (Experiments i n inert gas) Crackablc part in the non-distillable part of the sample (Experiments in inert gas)
3. I Crude 0il.v (Degasifietl Crudes)
99
(Table 4-1) using a series of empirical index numbers. Further characteriLation may be achieved using othcr index numbers derived from those aforementioned (Table 4-2). Quantitative statements concerning the kinetics of the pryrolysis and the oxidation behavior may be derived using IISC.
4.1 Crude oils (degasified crudes) Thernioanalysis on crude oils is only possible in hermetically sealed sample pans because these oils contain components which will degass at relatively low temperatures under atmospheric pressure. This behavior leads to considerable experimental difficulties; for example it is very difficult to avoid losscs during the filling of the sample pans. Degasified crudes on the other hand may be handled easily. The evaporation behavior of a representative selection of dcgasified crudes from German oil fields has been investigated using thc Stanton-Redcroft TG 750 thennobalance 14-21. The data characterizing these crudes are given in Table 4-3. It has been found that the evaporation of some crudes starts at room temperature, as soon as the oven is closed (Table 4-4). Thus the start tenipcrature of the evaporation cannot be clearly defined and so the beginning of the simulated distillation curve (see chapter 3. I .2) diverges considerably from the Engler boiling curve (DIN 5 1 75 I ); this is shown in Fig. 4- 1 using the example of the degasified crude (33.5 "C API) from the Landau oil field (Southwest Germany). During distillation according to DIN 5 I 75 1, cracking starts at 380 "C, whereas the simulated distillation curve gives an atmospheric boiling temperature of 440 "C. The degasified crudes from German oil fields which have been investigated, are usually light oils containing a high proportion of compounds which evaporate at experimental temperatures below 400 "C. The DTG curve often shows more than one peak maximum, the second and the third peaks usually appearing at temperatures above 400 "C, in the cracking range. A considerable residue is present at 600 "C (R600), but at 800 "C the residue (R800) is very small, thus indicating that the coking reaction is not yet complete at 600 "C. The relation of the temperature of the TGA (TTG)to the corresponding temperature of the distillation according to DIN 51 751 (T,) for corresponding evaporated portions shows an increase of TD/TTG with increasing amounts of distillate. The plot T,)/TTGversus % distillate has a linear function: TD/TTG = 0.00495 . % ' distillate
+ 0.38035
with a coefficient of correlation r = 0.98831 (Fig. 4-2).
Welpe Landau Darchi ng Monchsrot Aitingen Assling
Haime
Bramberge Gross Lessen Scheerhorn Hockstedt Diiste Aldorf
29.7
30.6 36.7 33.5 35. I 38.1 30.3 33. I
0.8695 0.8379 0.8545 0.8460 0.8312 0.87 14 0.8577
29.0 30.5 29.7 27.0 29,s 29.1
0.8747 0.8782 0.8703 0.8746 0.8896 0.8757 0.9777
33.4 31.6 33.7
0.8552 0.8642 0.8534
I .4 13.9 -
I .4 5.3 4.7
-
283 292 356
-
288 307
-
585 321 318 284
-
16.39 10.1 20.8') 3.4 14.9 3.6
-
-
435
1.49 0.48 3.00
328 342 352
0.9 1.6 2.7
-
1.5 4. I
-
0.35 I .8 8.75 2.7 3.3 5.9
-
1.03 0.95 1.70
(70 wt)
(Yc wt)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.35
-
3.70
-
2.13 2.49 2.73
(% W t )
Clonradson Coke
Dogger beta Dogger beta Dogger beta Cornbrash Dogger alpha Valanginian Valanginian Valanginian Valanginian, Wcalden Valanginian, Jurassic Jurassic Medium Kitnmcridge Jurassic Upper Kimmcridge Jurassic Tertiary Molassc, Priabonian Eocene Eocene Eocene, 'Icrtiary
Asphaltenes
Petrolcutn Resins
Wesendorf-Siid Vorhop-Knesebeck Hankensbuttel-Sud Kronsbcrg
Molecular Weight (Mean)
2
"AH
Geological Formation
Oil Field Specific Gravity at 20 "C (g/cm3)
3
g-
5 k a
2
23
P
P
2
$
2
*a
2
2
B 6'
==.
.d
-2
2
h
5
0
Table 4-3: Degasified German Crude Oils
%
2
4
4. I Crude Oils (Degnsificd Crudes)
30
Tt
-
r.c
Ic,
*
3Nr-mNCrC-
mmTt-*-Tt
10-
c1-
101
Eocene, Tertiary Eocene
Molasse Priabonian
Eocene Eocene
Assling Arlesried
Holzkirchen
Monchssot Aitingen Bramhar
-
Molasse Priabonian
Darching
Landau Velden 111
'
28 36 35 43
22 18 16
39 45
38
11
30
18
22
19 25 20
Upper Kimmeridge Jurassic Tertiary Molasse
35 46 55
44
28
Welpe
52
25
Jurassic Medium Kimmeridge Jurassic
Aldorf Hasme
T5 % ("C)
Geological Formation
Oil Field
TI % ("C)
Table 4-4: Thermogravimetry of Degasified German Crude Oils Heating Rate p = 10 K/min Atmosphere Argon, Flow rate = 25 cm3/min
97.1 88.7 70.5
91.2
92.2 96.7
89.0
90.1 85.5 85.0
81.8
83.7
(%I
AG400
2.0 6.9 7.3
4.3
3.4 0.7
0
0.5 6.4 5.3
4.0
5.9
(%I
R600
0
0.8 1.1
2.0
2.0 0
0
0 0.2 4.4
1.5
0.2
(%I
R800
4.93 1.85 3.20 2.24 1.77 2.96 2.76
4.41 2.21 0.75 2.24 3.25 0.4
3.12 2.67 2.74 1.34
2.14
2.27
DTG (%/min)
c
Plateau from 40 "C up to 460°C
35 250 171 166 86 389 435
51 218 463 107 126 445
172 263 143 435
5
2
B 0
5 "cl a
z
2a
&
n
z g
2a
a
Gl
5
2. R g. 09
3
186
n
30
3
h
h,
0
4.1 Crude Oils (Degasified Crudes) -
450
1
T
("C)
-
400
350
300 -
250 I
I
re
200
150 -
100
?
- I -I -I
25
50
75
Fig. 4-1 Distillation Curves of Crude Oil (Landau Field, Germany) Curve 1: Simulated Distillation by TG 750 Curve 2: Boiling Curve DIN 51 751
103
104
4 Themoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
-1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35 40 45 50 55 6 0 65 70
75 00
Fig. 4-2 Quotient of the Temperatures of Distillation T, (DIN 51 751) divided by the Temperatures in the Thermobalance TTGversus Quantity of Distillate. (Mean Values from German Crudes)
It is advantageous that thermogravimetry is not affected by even considerable water content in the sample, which might cause frothing over of the sample during distillation according to DIN 51 751. Fig. 4-3 shows the plot of TGA versus temperature for a degasified crude from the Scheerhorn oil field (Northwest Germany), firstly in the original state containing about 50% formation water and secondly after dewatering. Curve No. 1 in Fig. 4-3 shows the water content by the weight loss up to 100 "C. No problems arise with thermogravimetry on heavy crudes. The boiling curves simulated by means of thermogravimetry of a heavy crude from the Morichal I1 oil field (Venezuela), 9.3" API, and of crude from the Job0 oil field (Venezuela), 8.5" API, are shown in Fig. 4-4. This figure also shows a deviation of the boiling curve simulated by means of thermogravimetry, from that simulated by means of gas chromatography. The deviation is especially large in the range above 450 "C atmospheric boiling temperature. The crack reaction starts earlier in GC than in TGA. Oxidation starts at temperatures above 300 "C as already shown in the investigations on model substances. Fig. 4-5 shows the thermograms of the heavy crude from the Job0 field in argon and in air.
4.1 Crude Oils (Degasifed Crudes)
100
Res
7; ->T \
t \
\
15
--+ I!
T
1
50 __
i
\ \
25
-<\100
200
:
400
500
600
i
Fig. 4-3 Thermogravimetry in Argon (TG 750) Crude Oil from Scheerhorn Field (Germany) Curve 1: Sample Containing about 50 % Water of Formation Curve 2: Sample after removal of water
105
106
600 700
500
4 Thermoaizalyticnl Irzvestigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
r
-i --
L-
300
200
I
*
I
I
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Fig. 4-4 Distillation Curves of Heavy Crudes (Venezuela) Curve 1: Crude from Job0 Field (8.5"API), Simulated Distillation by TG 750 Curve 2: Crude from Jobo Field (8.5"AF'I), Simulated Distillation by Gas Chromatography Curve 3: Crude from Morichal I1 Field (9.3"AF'I), Simulated Distillation by TG 750
The thermograms of a heavy crude and its bitumen (B200) residue are shown in Fig. 4-6. The values of the Venezuelan crudes mentioned here are shown in Table 4-5 and in Table 4-6. Investigation on degasified crudes using DSC at high temperatures does not give any meaningful information. Light crudes will also evaporate prior to the start of any crack or oxidation reaction. Calculation of the coefficients in the Arrhenius equation from experiments in inert gas leads to values of the heat of evaporation analogous to the experiments
4.1 Crude Oils (Degasifed Crudes)
107
Fig. 4-5 Thermogravimetry of Heavy Crude from Jobo Field (8.5"API) by TG 750 Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Argon Curve2: Air
on n-alkanes. Heavy crudes exhibit an evaporation peak in the temperature range 250350 "Cand one pyrolysis peak between 450 "C and 500 OC,like the atmospheric residues (see chapter 4.2.8). The kinetic investigation on the heavy crude Morichal II give the following values: E (kJ/Mole) log A (min-') evaporation 78.5 6.325 pyrolysis 224.2 15.773
108
4 Thennoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Fig. 4-6 Thermogravimetry of Crude from Laguna Once Field (11.7"API) by TG 750 Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min (Argon) Curve 1: Crude Oil Curve 2: Vacuum Residue
Table 4-5: Composition of Venezuelan Crudes Oil Field
Jobo Morichal I1 Laguna Once Bitumen B200 from Laguna Once
Atomic Ratio H/C
Mean Mole- Dispersion Petroleum Asphaltenes Conradson lecular Medium Resins Coke Weight Residue (% wt) (% wt) (% wt) (% wt)
1.475 1.472 -
643 603 455
82.6 80.4
0.7 3.4
14.9 14.0
-
-
16.3 16.2
1.427
674
76.7
7.9
15.4
-
-
-
4.1 Crude Oils (Degasified Crudes)
109
Table 4-6: Thermogravimetry of Venezuelan Crudes Heating Rate p= 10 K/min Atmosphere Argon, Flow Rate = 25 cm3/min "API
Oil Field
T1%
T5%
(% wt)
(% wt)
AG400 (% wt)
(% wt)
R800
Jobo
8.5
107
157
52.9
11.5
Morichal I1
9.3
79
107
49.6
10.1
Laguna Once
11.7
73
108
63.5
9.0
-
184
219
50.0
13.8
Bitumen B200 from Laguna Once
DTG (%/min) 1.64 4.20 3.75 5.83 2.06 5.44 2.43 7.38
280 432 375 485 269 433 305 419
The unbranched n-alkanes in the degasified crudes may crystallize together regardless of the length of the carbon chain, forming mixed crystals of variable composition. The crystallization is recognized by a distinct exothermic peak in the cooling curve of DSC (Fig. 4-7), which appears in the crude tested at an extremly low temperature (-40 "C).
5-
2
1
0-
-40.03OC
-37.54'C
"
,.. 3
LL
2J/g
+J
I
L a L
-5-
-10-
I. B6OC
110
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
During heating of this sample, the melting peak will be obscured, since the heating rate p= 5 K/min is too fast for such an event to be recorded. Instead of the melting peak of the mixed crystals, the melting peak of the water still present in the sample appears at + 1.86 "C.Melting and crystallization peaks do not always appear so distinctly. A substantial part of the degasified crudes tested shows in stead, a step in the curve of energy flow versus temperature similar to the glass transition temperature of polymers. This is shown in Fig. 4-8 in the example of the degasified cnide from the Assling oil field (South Germany). Due to the slow heating/cooling rate of 2 K/min the difference between the mean values of the melting and the crystallization temperatures amounts to only about 1 "C. The start temperature of paraffin precipitation in this crude was found by other methods to be 20.2 "C. The water content in the degasified crude may be ascertained using the values of melting enthalpies measured and suitable calibration. The temperatures of the melting and freezing peaks also depend upon the concentration of salt in the water of formation. The concentration of n-alkanes with carbon chain length 2 C, can be correlated to the heats of crystallization or of melting measured in the sample, and the maximum temperature of crystallization can be related to the temperature of the pour point. The precipitation of paraffins and therefore pour points at a temperature of +20 "C, as measured on the crude of
-4
1
I
\I
29.99-c
26. 14 'C
-14
!
-60
- 40
- 20
0
Z'J
Temperature ( ' 0
Fig. 4-8 DSC of Crude Oil from Assling Field (Germany) Atmosphere: Argon, 1 bar, static HeatingKooling Rate p : 2 K/min
40
60
I
eo
4. I Crude Oils (Degasified Crudes)
111
the Assling oil field, led to difficulties during transport in pipelines at low enviromental temperatures. Therefore pour point depressants or flow improvers will frequently be added to the crudes in order to guarantee transportability in pipelines. DSC experiments have demonstrated that these substances must exhibit a crystallization peak in the range of the peak maximum temperature of crystallization of the crude, if they are to have any effect upon flow behavior at low temperatures. The theory has thus been confirmed, that the flow improver does not decrease the temperature of crystallization of the n-alkanes present in the crude, but that crystal structures are formed which do not increase the oil viscosity a< much as would have been done by pure n-alkane crystals [4-31. Determination of the crystallization temperature of the crude may help to optimize the choice of flow improvers. In summary: thermogravimetry in inert gas gives a preliminary view of the thermal behavior in the investigation of degasified crudes. The experiment is straightforward and quick so that information is obtained promptly. Light crudes should be topped prior to thermogravimetry in order to be on the safe side for subsequent quantitative evaluation, and so that the instrument is not damaged by condensation of vapor which might occur around the balance hangdown. The thermal and oxidative behavior of heavy crudes can be well-characterized by both TGA and DSC. Low temperature DSC supplies quantitative results for the content of water and of n-alkanes. The determination of the pour point of dark oils, which is not always so exact, may be markedly improved using DSC tests. The choice of optimally acting flow improvers is also facilitated.
4.2 Refinery residues The answer to the question as to which products may gained from crude oils and from refinery residues in which quantities, and by which processes, is an important criterion for the manufacturer. This question may be answered relatively easy for crude oils using international standardized test methods. Determination of the specific weight of two distilled key fractions allows the nature of the crude oil to be classified as e.g. paraffin based oil, naphthene-based oil, or mixed base oil [4-41. Test distillations at atmospheric pressure [4-5 to 4-71 and at reduced pressure (vacuum) [4-6, 4-8, 4-91 can provide the yields of liquid products at an existing refinery lay out. Examination of refinery residues is more difficult with regard to the products which may gained from them, the processes to use, and the yields expected. The refining processes involved are mostly thermal processes, for example thermal and catalytic cracking, visbreaking, hydrocracking, or coking. Although thermal methods of analysis are being applied more and more often for the characterization of petroleum products and for the investigation of their evaporation, pyrolysis, and oxidation behavior, there is no reference to the subject of working-up of residues in the compilation by DGMK (DGMK-Projekt 289-06) [l-21 where 174 papers are reviewed.
112
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
The advantages and limitation of thermoanalytical mcthods with regard to the workingu p of residues will b e demonstrated on a wide selection of residues from petroleum refining. We shall consider vacuum residues and bitumens derived from vacuum residues (samples 1 to 13), atmospheric residues (samples 14 to 17), residues from conversion processes (samples 18 t o 22), and products from conversion processes (samples 23 to 25) from crude oils of different provenance.
4.2.1 Description and characterization of the samples Twentyfive samples which have been investigated are presented in Table 4-7. These samples were characterized by the usual technical data and b y detailed analysis.
Table 4-7: Samples for Investigation Sample No. 1
7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21
Vacuum residue from a crude from Boscan (Venezuela); properties between bitumens B80 and B200 Bitumen B45 (semiblown) from a crude from Safaniya (Saudi Arabia) Bitumen B80 from a crude from Agha Jari (Iran) Bitumen B45 (Venezuela) Bitumen B80 (Venezuela) Vacuum residue from a crude from Kirkuk (Iraq); properties corresponding to bitumen B65 (semiblown) Bitumen B80 (Middle East; semiblown) Vacuum residue from a crude from Kuwait; properties between bitumens B80 and B200 Bitumen B200 from a mixture of crudes from the Forties field (Great Britain) and Arabian Light Vacuum residue from Arabian Heavy crude; properties corresponding to bitumen B200 Sample No. 9 blown; properties corresponding to a blown bitumen 85/25 Precipitated bitumen (propane bitumen); properties corresponding to bitumen B65 Bitumen B80 (Middle East) Atmospheric residue from an Arabian Light crude (dark brown, highly viscous sample) Atmospheric residue from a Kirkuk (Iraq) crude (dark brown, highly viscous sample) Atmospheric residue from a mixture of crudes from Tuimaza (Russia) and Arabian Heavy (dark brown, highly viscous sample) Atmospheric residue from a Kuwait crude (blackish-brown, highly viscous sample) Raw material for sample No. 8 Residue from thermal cracking; base Arabian Light (very highly viscous, dark brown substance, still flowing at room temperature) Residue from visbreaking (shiny dark brown, sticky substance, not flowing at room temperature) Residue from catalytic cracking; base Kirkuk (black, shiny, brittle solid) Residue from visbreaking; base Venezuela (blackish-brown viscous substance)
4.2 Refinery Residues
113
Sample No. 22 23 24 25
Residue from thermal cracking; base Iranian Heavy (brittle black solid) Waxy distillate from the residue from thermal cracking; base Nigeria/Libya (blackish-brown viscous substance) Furfural extract (greenish-brown liquid) Distillate from the residue from catalytic cracking (blackish-brown liquid)
The following technical data were determined (for samples which are solid at room temperature): - softening point Ring and Ball (R&B) in "C according to DIN 52 01 1 - penetration at 25 "C in 0.1 mm according to DIN 52 010 For the liquid samples, the viscosity in mm2/s has been measured using a capillary viscosimeter (system Cannon-Fenske ASTM D 251.5) at 50 "C and 100 OC, according to DIN 51 366. For all samples the coke residue was determined according to Conradson (DIN 5 1 55 1). The results of the tests are presented in Table 4-8. Table 4-8: Technical Data of the Samples
Sample
Softening
Penetration
No.
Point
at 25 "C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
37.4 54.0 46.0 56.7 45.5 45.0 45.0 38.1 39.5 40.0 86.5 57.0 48.0 0.7 9.0
138.5 34.0 65.4 30.0 67.0 54.5 68.0 124.0 186.0 196.0 18.0 62.0 80.0
-
47.0 92.0 45.5
-
88.0 1.o 92.0
at 50 "C
Viscosity at 100 "C
Conradson Coke Residue
16.4 21.3 21.3 21.7 19.0 21.5 21.6 20.2 19.7 20.1 24.9 20.8 20.2 8.6 10.4 8.9 10.6 9.9 25.7 39.4 22.9
114
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products ~~~
Sample No.
22 23 24 25
Softening Point R&B ("C)
Penetration at 25 "C
95.0
1.o
(0.1 mm)
-
-
Viscosity at 50 "C at 100 "C
Conradson Coke Residue
(mm2/s)
(mm2/s)
(% wt)
-
-
1804
-
41.4 9.9
a04 60
37.0 7.0
2.4
-
The analytical data which were determined for the samples, are thought to be fundamental to their characterization and include: -
element analysis mean relative particle mass (molecular weight) oxide ash colloidal composition structural group analysis
Element analysis was canied out by a commerical analytical laboratory. The contents of carbon C, hydrogen H, nitrogen N, and sulfur S were determined. The oxygen content was calculated as the difference to 100 % wt. The mean relative particle masses (mean molecular weight) was measured using a vapor pressure osmometer (test in benzene at 38 "C). The contents of oxide ash were determined according to DIN 51 575. The results are presented in Table 4-9. Table 4-9: Element Analysis, Mean Relative Particle Mass, and Ashes Sample No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
C
H
N
S
O*
H/C Mean Oxide Ash atomic Particle Mass (% wt)
3.08 4.92 3.15 5.23 3.28 5.68 5.37 5.02 3.95 5.18 5.01 1.99 5.03 2.87 3.97 2.61
0.92
1.449 1.447 1.487 1.404 1.454 1.397 1.397 1.407 1.431 1.446 1.420 1.405 1.464 1.548 1.549 1.542
(% wt)
85.24 85.00 85.54 83.02 85.59 83.77 83.67 83.92 85.61 84.13 84.85 86.07 84.53 85.37 84.39 85.12
10.29 10.25 10.60 9.81 10.37 9.75 9.74 9.84 10.21 10.14 10.04 10.08 10.11 11.01 10.89 10.94
0.47 0.28 0.51 0.31 0.45 0.37 0.35 0.33 0.39 0,42 0.31 0.63 0.51 0.14 0.34 0.32
-
0.20 0.83 0.31 0.43 0.87 0.89 -
0.13 -
1.23 -
0.61 0.41 1.01
694 839 1035 896 1161 1033 1015 1045 1029 975 1204 1108 990 538 592 532
0.09 0.06 0.05 0.07 0.12 0.11 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.54 0.03 0.01 0.04
4.2 Refinery Residues
Sample No.
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
C
H
S
0"
4.09 2.47 3.60 6.85 3.23 6.13 2.34 2.54 1.49
0.05 0.17 2.29 4.72 1.71 2.00 1.31 0.78 0.91
N (% wt)
84.96 87.11 83.54 79.38 84.54 82.71 86.65 86.10 89.55
10.75 9.95 9.92 8.51 9.84 8.39 9.39 10.27 7.97
0.15 0.30 0.65 0.54 0.68 0.77 0.31 0.31 0.08
115
H/C Mean Oxide Ash atomic Particle Mass (% wt)
1.518 1.371 1.425 1.286 1.396 1.217 1.300 1.431 1.063
575 410 565 883 712 1085 408 525 283
0.03 0.43 0.16 0.03 0.16 0.09 0.01 0.01 0.01
"0 calculated as difference to 100 %
The colloidal system was separated by means of precipitation using acetic acid ethyl ester according to Neumann [4-101 in colloids (precipitate) and dispersion medium. The portion of the precipitate soluble in n-pentane is defined as petroleum resins, the portion soluble in benzene as asphaltenes. The colloidal composition of the samples is given in Table 4-10.
Table 4-10: Colloidal Composition of the Samples ~
Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
~
Dispersion Medium (% wt)
Petroleum Resins (% wt)
Asphaltenes
C Colloids
(% wt)
(% wt)
80.3 65.8 64.0 67.3 75.2 78.8 68.7 70.2 72.3 69.9 55.8 70.2 68.7 91.7 89.1 91.3 82.1 98.4
1.9 8.5 13.0 3.5 4.0 6.0 10.6 8.6 8.4 10.0 9.3 12.2 8.1 2.2 2.8 2.2 10.0 0.6
17.8 25.7 23.0 29.2 20.8 15.2 20.7 21.2 19.3 20.1 34.9 17.6 21.2 6.1 8.1 6.5 7.9 1.o
19.7 34.2 36.0 32.7 24.8 21.2 31.3 29.8 27.7 30.1 44.2 29.8 29.3 8.3 10.9 8.7 17.9 1.6
116
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Sample No.
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Dispersion Medium (% wt)
Petroleum Resins (% wt)
82.0 79.4 74.6 67.2 97.2 no colloids no colloids
1.9 2.7 3.1 3.3 1.1
Asphaltenes
C Colloids
(% wt)
(% wt)
16.1 17.9 22.3 29.5 1.7
18.0 20.6 25.4 32.8 2.8
From the results of IR and NMR spectroscopic measurements in combination with the element analysis and the determination of the mean relative particle mass, statistical information concerning the structural composition may be derived according to Oelert [4-111. These calculations supply much more information than the results of the ndMmethod. The results of the structural group analysis of the samples are given in Tables 4- 11 to 4-13. Table 4-11: Structural Group Analysis Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
CA
CN
CP
RG
RA
RN
FA
30.30 27.06 28.16 35.15 32.68 33.36 36.15 30.03 29.30 25.32 25.92 41.43 43.14 24.54 23.86 25.52 29.14 36.64 34.38 40.88 36.90 50.29 5 1.57 40.28 58.59
28.09 33.15 26.33 17.20 21.31 27.87 21.89 32.46 29.67 36.40 25.33 8.41 0.95 16.40 18.55 28.65 14.10 19.07 33.29 35.10 15.21 15.92 9.40 11.63 15.51
41.60 39.79 45.51 47.65 46.01 38.77 41.96 37.51 41.03 38.28 48.75 50.16 55.91 59.06 57.59 45.83 56.76 44.29 32.33 24.02 47.89 33.78 39.03 43.09 25.89
6.72 10.00 6.75 7.68 7.01 9.09 8.51 11.33 11.41 11.61 12.44 8.55 6.00 3.95 4.39 4.49 4.43 4.52 7.12 12.07 6.38 11.35 3.84 4.35 3.59
2.58 3.20 2.58 4.30 3.29 3.71 4.15 3.94 4.16 3.32 5.25 6.33 5.78 2.02 2.05 1.91 2.53 2.64 2.66 4.92 3.84 7.39 2.92 2.90 2.57
4.14 6.80 4.17 3.38 3.72 5.38 4.36 7.39 7.25 8.29 7.18 2.23 0.22 1.93 2.34 2.58 1.90 1.88 4.46 7.15 2.54 3.96 0.92 1.45 1.02
0.303 0.270 0.281 0.378 0.326 0.333 0.361 0.300 0.295 0.253 0.321 0.414 0.431 0.296 0.282 0.275 0.323 0.461 0.343 0.418 0.398 0.514 0.515 0.402 0.676
4.2 Refinery Residues Abbreviations used for structural groups in Table 4-11: CA CN CP RC RA RN FA
% Carbon in aromatic bonding % Carbon in naphthenic bonding % Carbon in paraffinic bonding
Total number of rings per average molecule Number of aromatic rings per average molecule Number of naphthenic rings per average molecule Aromaticity = (CCHA + CSA + CKA) 0.1
Table 4-12: Structural Group Analysis SampleNo.
C3P
C2P
C1P
C 3 A C 2 A C 1 A CCHA C S A C K A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
11.21 8.62 10.23 8.83 9.62 8.55 7.95 9.40 7.91 4.98 8.36 6.18 7.74 10.96 10.71 10.15 8.84 7.93 7.57 6.29 8.69 6.24 6.93 7.37 5.16
26.59 29.10 30.31 27.83 27.20 29.62 27.49 29.73 34.39 36.44 35.42 23.38 23.03 35.39 36.01 34.33 33.99 26.47 26.95 24.91 23.08 17.83 18.87 27.43 11.76
13.19 19.26 13.25 13.13 16.66 15.14 14.27 11.71 15.80 18.91 13.65 10.52 11.58 13.63 15.65 16.98 13.92 9.57 15.74 11.88 12.27 8.87 6.51 12.27 3'49
13.71 15.96 13.00 12.22 13.04 13.34 14.14 9.82 12.40 16.93 10.45 13.31 13.78 7.73 9.34 11.04 10.50 9.87 15.36 15.02 13.43 15.63 10.55 12.65 10.61
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.26 0.49 1.93 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.77 0.00 4.19 0.00 0.90
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.42 0.40 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.00 1.39 0.00 0.28
9.21 4.60 8.71 12.00 13.43 10.96 12.35 3.67 8.39 8.33 6.21 14.10 18.96 8.46 9.08 9.19 9.95 14.97 12.85 13.78 9.30 19.33 22.61 20.29 29.39
13.71 15.96 13.00 12.22 13.84 13.34 14.14 19.13 12.40 16.98 10.45 13.43 14.51 10.33 9.34 11.04 10.92 9.87 15.36 15.02 16.12 15.63 16.13 12.65 1139
7.39 6.50 6.45 13.63 5.40 9.06 9.66 2.23 8.71 0.00 15.47 8.85 9.66 10.81 9.87 7.27 11.45 21.33 6.17 13.09 14.43 15.96 12.83 7.34 26.42
Abbreviations used for structural groups in Table 4-12:
C3P C2P C I P C3A C2A C1A CCHA CSA CKA
Portion Portion Portion Portion Portion Portion Portion Portion Portion
of carbon of carbon of carbon of carbon of carbon of carbon of carbon of carbon of carbon
(relative) in methyl groups not on aromatic rings (relative) in methylene groups not on aromatic rings (relative) in methyne groups not on aromatic rings (relative) in methyl groups on aromatic rings (relative) in methylene groups on aromatic rings (relative) in methyne groups on aromatic rings (relative) in aromatic ring CH-groups (relative) in substituted aromatic ring C-atoms (relative) in combination points of connected aromatic rings
117
118
4 Therrnoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-13: Structural Group Analysis SampleNo.
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
ZC
ZH
44.21 63.60 61.57 88.47 47.58 70.25 58.97 82.24 52.38 75.61 57.88 80.28 59.70 82.81 68.26 95.37 73.35 104.23 68.23 97.98 85.06 119.92 79.40 110.80 69.68 99.29 35.40 54.39 37.80 58.12 36.07 55.24 40.67 61.32 29.70 38.64 40.22 54.37 61.09 74.46 50.12 69.50 74.72 90.31 29.44 38.01 37.46 53.12 19.76 20.35
SGA
0.60 0.78 0.60 0.50 0.51 0.55 0.53 0.69 0.60 0.67 0.63 0.57 0.43 0.55 0.51 0.55 0.53 0.40 0.54 0.52 0.63 0.44 0.42 0.38 0.29
HARU QCAG CHXP CHXA KLMX KLMN
0.16 0.76 0.77 0.69 0.83 0.73 0.73 0.93 0.71 1.00 0.64 0.19 0.78 0.77 0.77 0.79 0.12 0.68 0.82 0.70 0.69 0.71 0.75 0.82 0.70
0.20 0.22 0.18 0.19 0.21 0.20 0.22 0.27 0.18 0.22 0.14 0.32 0.26 0.14 0.12 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.23 0.25 0.26 0.31 0.33 0.21 0.29
2.08 2.01 2.02 1.95 2.00 2.10 2.03 2.46 2.06 1.92 1.92 1.95 1.91 1.95 1.93 2.02 1.92 1.86 2.17 2.55 1.95 2.08 2.15 1.97 1.83
3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.38 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.67 2.93 2.68 3.00 3.00 2.95 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.78 3.00 2.57 3.00 2.87
3.38 10.37 11.57 16.69 12.81 10.77 12.87 7.13 16.20 26.47 21.54 21.24 24.45 14.35 15.19 9.89 16.05 3.87 4.78 2.65 12.57 9.90 5.70 11.51 2.75
1.67 1.70 2.39 1.92 2.09 1.53 1.67 0.95 2.11 2.19 1.76 1.64 2.30 2.69 3.25 2.45 2.95 1.33 0.83 0.19 1.49 0.65 0.95 2.11 0.36
Abbreviations used for structural groups in Table 4-13:
zc ZH SGA HARU QCAG CHXP CHXA KLMX KLMN
Total number of carbon atoms in the average molecule Total number of hydrogen atoms in the average molecule Level of aromatic substitution Ratio of the theoretical number of aromatic bonded H atoms to the total number of aromatic C atoms Fraction of any aliphatic structural groups bonded to aromatic rings related to the total number of aliphatic structural groups Average composition of the aliphatic smctural groups Average composition of the aliphatic structural groups bonded on aromatic rings Maximum lenght of the carbon chain of the paraffinic portion in the average molecule Minimum length of the carbon chain of the paraffinic portion in the average molecule
4.2.2 Implementation and evaluation of tests The measurements were carried out using a Stanton-Redcroft TG 750 thermobalance and a DuPant 990 Thermoanalyzer equipped with a pressure DSC cell, The standard experimental conditions used for thermogravimetry were: a heating rate /3= 10 K/min and a gas flow rate of 25 cm3/min. The experiments were performed in inert
4.2 Refinery Residues
119
gas (argon) and in oxidizing atmosphere (air). The index numbers described in chapter 4.1 were determined from the thermogravimetry diagrams. In order to investigate reaction kinetics, DSC experiments were performed at different heating rates (p= 10, 20, and 50 K/min). The inert gas was argon at 1 bar pressure and a flow rate of 5 cm3/min.Additional experimental runs were performed in methane at 10 bar pressure and at a flow rate of 5 cm3/min in order to study the influence of a hydrocarbon atmosphere and to simulate the thermal cracking process. Unfortunately, methane pressure highter than 10 bar was not available, so the conditions of the cracking process could not be simulated perfectly.
4.2.2.1 Deviations in thermogravimetry The repeatability of the test results is very good for distillates, as was shown in preliminary experiments. The curves of weight versus temperature TGA and of weight loss rate versus temperature DTG coincide perfectly in repeated experiments. However, for crude oils and for distillation residues, inhomogeneities may influence the results since the weighed portions are small (5 to 8 mg). This is demonstrated by sample 3 (bitumen B80 Agha Jari, Fig. 4-9), sample 19 (visbreaker residue), and sample 20 (residue from thermal cracking). Curves of mean values (average curves) may be constructed by the summation of single weight loss data (from each isothermal), with temperature differences of, for example, 50 K, as shown in Fig. 4-10. Calculation of the coefficients of variation 2 V of the means at isothermal temperatures may also be used for a plot of coefficient of variation _+ V versus temperature, which shows the dependence of the scattering (& V) upon the temperature (Fig. 4-1 1). Sample 20, which can be perceived by optical means to be inhomogeneous, demonstrates the widest scattering, with a coefficient of variation V = & 20.75 % (at 500 "C). Samples 3 and 19 representing vacuum residues (bitumens) have maxima of the coefficients of variation (V = k 7.5 % and k 11.1 % respectively) in the temperature range from 450 "C to 600 "C. The highest values of the coefficients of variation are naturally found in temperature ranges where the slope of the TGA curve is particularly steep. The scattering of the index numbers mentioned in chapter 4.1 also corresponds to such limits. Table 4-14 gives the coefficients of variation of the index numbers for the three samples mentioned above. The repeatability of the index number representing the start of evaporation T5 % is considerably better than that of T1 %. In general the repeatability of the index numbers for both vacuum residues (3 and 19) is better than that of the rather inhomogeneous sample 20.
120
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
'Residue (Wt-Z) 101
9(
8( 7c
6C 50
40 30 20
I0
Tlk) 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Fig. 4-9 Thermogravimetry (TG 750) Repeated experiments Sample No. 3 Bitumen B80 (Field Agha Jari) Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min
4.2 Refinery Residues
Residue (Wt-X)
lo( 9c
80
70
6t
Sf
LO
30 2c 10
Ti ‘Cl 100
200
300
LOO
SO0
600
700
Fig. 4-10 Thermogravimetry (TG 750) Sample No. 3 Bitumen B80 (Field Agha Jari) Curve of the Mean Values from 10 Experiments
800
121
122
20
I
4 Therrnoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
v i 'hi
7--*
\
T("CI
Fig. 4-11 Coefficient of Variation +V of the Mean Values of TGA Curves of Samples No. 3, No. 19, and No. 20
Definitions: Mean (arithmetical mean) X =
1
-
xi
Standard Deviation f s = Coefficient of Variation f V =
100 s X
4.2 Refinery Residues
123
Table 4-14 Coefficient of Variation + V % of the Index Numbers for Samples 3, 19 and 20 Sample No. 3
T1% T5 % AG400 R800 DTG
Tmx TW GW ND CR
= ND
eND !B
14.00 2.20 4.55 3.42 2.92 1.47 2.35 2.18 4.49
100 100
Sample No. 19
6.45 3.67 6.88 2.82 3.54 1.57 2.68 3.45 identical to AG400 8.45
Sample No. 20
7.32 2.09 4.20 7.39 11.63 1.71 8.23 12.87 9.94
3.69
3.23
4.55
4.15
6.57
8.23
4.2.3 Thermogravimetry in an inert atmosphere The different thermal behavior of the different groups of sample may be demonstrated using the TGA curves of the samples No. 8: vacuum residue Kuwait (Fig. 4-12), No. 10: vacuum residue Arabian Heavy (Fig. 4-13), No. 14: atmospheric residue Arabian Light (Fig. 4-14), No. 17: atmospheric residue Kuwait (raw material for sample No. 8) (Fig. 4lS), No. 21: visbreaker residue base Venezuela (Fig. 4-16), and No. 22: residue from thermal cracking, base Iranian Heavy (Fig. 4-17). Each of the products shows a temperaturerange of varying length before any weight loss occurs. This induction period is followed by a fall in the TGA curve with varying slope, which can indicate losses due to evaporation as well as to cracking. A boundary for the transition between evaporation and cracking cannot generally be recognised in the TGA curves. Due to the composition of the samples, some TGA curves level considerably above a temperature of approximately 450 'C, and run almost parallel to the x-axis, indicating the different amounts of coke residue. The curves of the first differential of mass loss with respect to time, DTG, i. e. the reaction rate, versus temperature show up to three maxima. The index numbers found directly from the diagrams are presented in Table 4-15 and all the derived index numbers are in Table 4-16.
124
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Fig. 4-12 Thermogravimetry (TG 750) Sample No. 8 Vacuum Residue from Kuwait Crude Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min
4.2 Refinery Residues
100 90
8C 70
60 9
10
M 20 10
100
200
300
LOO
500
600
700
8m TCC 1
-
Fig. 4-13 Thermogravimetry (TG 750) Sample No. 10 Vacuum Residue from Arabian Heavy Crude Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min
125
126
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Residue (Wt-X) 100
90
80
70
60 50
LO
30
20 10
100
200
YbO
LOO
500
600
700
800
Fig. 4-14 Thermogravimetry (TG 750) Sample No. 14 Atmospheric Residue from Arabian Light Crude Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min
4.2 Refinery Residues
Fig. 4-15 Thermogravimetry (TG 750) Sample No. 17 Atmospheric Residue Kuwait Crude Heating Rate 0: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min
127
128
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Residue ( W t - % )
Fig. 4-16 Therrnogravimetry (TG 750) Sample No. 21 Visbreaker Residue (Venezuela Crude) Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min
4.2 Refinery Residues
Fig. 4-17 Thermogravimetry (TG 750) Sample No. 22 Residue from Thermal Cracker (Iranian Heavy) Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min
129
130
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-15: Index Numbers of Thermogravimetry in Argon Sample No.
TI % ("C)
T5% AG200 AG300 AG400 R800 DTG (%) (%I (%) (%) (%/min) ("C)
1
181
237
2.0
18.0
44.0
12.4
2 3 4
245 262 223
307 345 285
0.5 0 0
4.3 1.7 7.3
22.5 20.0 32.4
16.4 13.3 16.4
5 6 7 8 9
237 300 264 296 278
292 365 328 359 320
0 0 0 0 0.5
6.1 1.2 2.5 1.1 2.0
29.0 11.0 19.7 12.7 28.0
14.4 19.2 19.5 14.3 8.0
10 11 12 13 14
236 279 295 243 97
290 325 350 303 182
0 0 0 0 7.2
6.2 2.3 1.5 4.5 29.8
37.1 26.5 16.7 29.8 62.7
11.5 18.0 15.7 13.7 5.0
15
151
204
4.8
28.5
60.0
8.3
16
148
195
6.0
34.0
65.0
9.0
17
165
215
5.7
28.5
59.7
0
18 19 20 21
133 148 282 157
189 213 360 22 1
6.3 4.0 0.2 3.5
50.0 17.0 1.5 16.0
82.9 46.5 23.8 40.0
5.5 21.0 10.0 7.1
22 23 24 25
26 1 155 170 98
323 200 22 1 154
0 5.0 2.6 15.8
3.3 45.5 27.8 45.5
23.7 70.5 92.0 92.8
30.7 2.0 0 0
2.72 4.87 5.99 11.43 2.92 5.83 7.19 6.85 6.38 9.51 6.57 6.48 4.62 6.20 8.87 6.86 3.25 2.85 3.17 3.96 3.53 1.11 3.89 2.24 1.89 6.39 4.34 5.76 2.90 2.46 5.72 4.73 9.04 7.35
Tmm ("C)
Tw
("1
(%)
Gw
310 470 475 441 362 472 478 465 470 482 433 454 419 449 448 438 319 456 300 440 300 480 306 464 621 296 447 435 409 456 448 298 346 274
515
16.5
512 500 530
22.0 18.0 20.5
515 518 550 520 495
19.0 31.3 30.0 24.3 20.5
480 490 485 495 495
31.8 32.5 21.8 21.2 9.8
487
14.3
520
16.0
500
23.3
450 530 555 500
14.2 24.2 35.0 35.0
482 350 375 325
39.3 34.3 10.5 11.5
4.2 Refinery Residues
131
Table 4-16: Derived index Numbers from Thermogravimetry in Argon Sample No. ND
(awt)
CR
CCR ~. ND
100 R800 ND ~
'
100
(% wt)
(%I
(%I
43.6 61.1 66.7 51.1 56.6 69.8 60.8 73.0 72.0 51.4 55.5 67.6 56.5 28.5 31.7 26.0 40.3 11.6 32.6 47.0 52.9 46.1 27.5 8.0 7.2
29.3 27.5 26.6 32.2 26.8 24.2 26.9 23.1 24.6 32.0 33.9 25.0 28.8 25.7 26.0 25.4 26.3 57.9 48.0 51.4 38.2 54.3 33.6
22.1 21.2 16.6 24.3 20.3 21.6 24.3 16.4 10.0 18.3 24.5 18.9 19.5 14.9 20.8 25.7
CR ND
~
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
56.0 17.5 80.0 67.5 71.0 89.0 80.3 87.3 80.0 62.9 73.5 83.3 70.2 33.5 40.0 35.0 40.3 17.1 53.5 76.2 60.0 76.3 29.5 8.0 7.2
-
33.3
-
32.2 39.3 38.3 11.8 39.6 68.0 -
0.78 0.79 0.83 0.76 0.80 0.78 0.76 0.84 0.90 0.82 0.76 0.81 0.80 0.85 0.79 0.74 1.oo 0.66 0.61 0.62 0.88 0.60 0.93 1.00 1.00
4.2.3.1 Directly measured index numbers The start temperature of evaporation for bitumens and vacuum residues is in the range from 180-300 "C (T1 %) or 237 to 365 "C (T5 %) respectively. Atmospheric residues start to evaporate between 97 "C and 165 "C (T1 %) or 182 "C and 215 "C (T5 %). For the products from conversion processes, the evaporation start temperature depends on the degree of distillation which took place after the conversion process. Therefore the start temperatures of the samples of this investigation show wide ranges from 98-261 "C (Tl %) and 154-324 "C (T5 %). T5 % exhibits a linear correlation with T1 %:
T1 % = 0.771 . (T5 %) The coefficient 0.771 is the arithmetical mean of 22 samples with a coefficient of variation +V = 7.3 % (relative).
132
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
The weight loss up to 400 "C (A G400) which is the fraction of the sample subject to distillation, decreases when the evaporation temperature increases. The limits found for AG400 are: AG400 (wt %) Minimum Maximum ~~~~
Bitumens and Vacuum Residues Atmospheric Residues Products from Conversion Processes
11 59 23
44 66.5 93
A linear correlation of AG400 with TI % and T5 % can be derived: AG400 = 119.4 - 0.364 (TI %) r = 0.900 AG400 = 134.5 - 0.343 (T5 %) r = 0.920 The residue at 800 "C (RSOO) depends on the concentration of colloids in the samples. Samples which still have a distillable fraction, have a smaller R800 than samples without this fraction: R800 (wt %) Minimum Maximum Bitumens and Vacuum Residues Products from Conversion Processes with distillable fraction without distillable fraction
8.0
19.5
0 7.1
5.5 30.2
The R800 is always smaller than the Conradson coke residue CCR (DIN 51 551). A linear dependence exists:
CCR = 1.328 . (R800) r = 0.972 The curve of the first differential of the weight with respect to time DTG versus the temperature shows up to three maxima. Maxima in the temperature range < 400 "C will be associated with evaporation processes, maxima in the range > 400 "C represent crack (pyrolysis) processes. Of the 13 bitumens and vacuum residues in this investigation, only two samples show maxima in the evaporation range as well as in the crack (pyrolysis) range. The other 11 samples have only one maximum, in the cracking range. The four atmospheric residues possess at least two maxima, one of them in the evaporation range between 300 "C and 320 "C, the other in the cracking range between 440 "C and 465 "C. Of the products from conversion processes, samples 18, 23, 24, and 25 exhibit only one maximum each in the distillation range, whereas samples 19, 20,21, and 22 have only one maximum, in the cracking range. Statistical evaluation of all maxima in the distillation range results in a mean of the temperature Tm X = 3 11.1 "C with a coefficient of variaton & V = 8.2. The same evaluation
4.2 Refinery Residues
133
of the maxima in the cracking (pyrolysis) range results in a mean temperature of TmxX = V = 3.1 9% regardless of the origin of the sample. 451.5 "C with a coefficient The maximum of the weight loss rate DTG is found within the following limits: DTG (%/An) Minimum Maximum Distillation Processes Cracking Processes
2.72 1.11
9.04 11.43
The lower values are normally found if the process is spread over a wider temperature range. A high value of DTG is generally connected with a narrow range of temperatures within which the reaction takes place. This is an indication that a relatively uniform substance distills or is cracked.
Table 4-17: Maximum of Weight Loss Rate Related to the Actual Residual Weight Sample No.
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Cracking Range DTG (%/min)
Distillation Range DTG (%/min)
-
-
5.86 4.28 5.33 5.35
319 306 300 306
18 19 20
12.05
296
21 22 23 24 25
5.09
409
8.40 28.24 17.93
298 346 274
-
-
15.69 16.85 24.99 15.63 21.44 14.56 13.89 20.24 13.14 21.60 8.80 12.40 18.48 16.33 18.49 14.95 5.84 7.73 16.05
470 475 44 1 472 478 465 470 482 433 454 419 449 448 438 456 440 480 464 62 1
12.23 12.30 15.90 5.47 11.22
447 435 45 1 456 448
-
-
-
-
-
-
134
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
The DTG data of the cracking (pyrolysis) reactions for the substances which had already experienced weight loss through distillation, exhibit an additional error, because the value is related to the start weight and not to the residual weight, after distillation losses. Table 4-17 gives the corrected values of the maximum weight loss rate, referred to the residual weight at the corresponding maximum temperatures T-. The extrapolated temperature T, of the point of inflexion of the TGA curve (offset point) is found in the range from 500-550 "C with the exception of low boiling samples 23, 24, and 25, which exhibit temperatures from 325-375 "C. Statistical evaluation of the temperatures T, gives the following results: Mean Statistical evaluation of all samples (1-22) Bitumens and Vacuum residues (Samples 1-13) Atmospheric residues (Samples 14-17) Products from conversion processes (Samples 18-22)
X ("C)
Coefficient of Variation +V(%)
505.6 508.1 500.5 503.4
4.75 3.87 2.81 8.12
Variance analysis shows that all four means are within the confidence level, and do not demonstrate any statistical difference. Samples 18-22 are very different conversion products, and show the largest scattering. The residues G, are not as uniform within the different product groups as the temperatures T,. Regarding the group of vacuum residues (bitumens, samples 1- 13)the G, data of samples 6, 7, 10, and 11 stand out distinctly. Statistical evaluation of these samples separately results in a considerable higher mean: Residual weight G, (wt%) at the point of inflexion of the TGA-curve:
Samples 1-5, 8, 9, 12, 13 Samples 6, 7, 10, 11
x (wt %)
*V(%)
20.2 31.4
9.80 3.36
Contrary to the T, values there is a statistical difference in the means of G,. Temperature T, ("C) at the point of inflexion of the TGA-curve:
Samples No. 1-5, 8, 9, 12, 13 Samples No. 6, 7, 10, 11
x ("C)
* V(%)
507.4 509.5
2.85 6.17
Samples 6, 7, 10, 11 are blown bitumens (partly oxidized) whereas the other samples represent vacuum residues (distillation bitumens). The Conradson coke residue CCR of samples 6,7, 10, and 11 is within the limits of the other samples of this group. The corresponding temperatures TccR, with values of
135
4.2 Refinery Residues
600-700 "C, exceed the mean of the other nine samples substantially (2 = 522.1 "C, 5.27 %).
fV =
The data for the residue G, at the temperature T, clearly exceed the corresponding data of R800. On the other hand the G, values are comparable to the corresponding Conradson coke residues GccR.The same is valid if the temperature TccRis ascertained from the TGA diagram using the corresponding weight of CCR (GCCR).There is a relatively good coincidence of TWITccRand G,/GccR (Table 4-18). For complete coincidence both quotients should equal one. Table 4-18: Correlation of temperature and residual weight data from TGA and CCR methods. Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
T,
roc] 515 5 12 500 530 515 518 510 520 495 480 490 485 495 485 487 520 500 450 530 555 500 482 350 375 325
G, [wt %]
TCCR
GCCR
L
G,
[%I
[wt %]
TCCR
GCCR
16.5 22.0 18.0 20.5 19.0 31.3 30.0 22.3 20.5 31.8 32.5 21.8 21.2 9.8 14.3 16.0 23.3 14.2 24.2 35.0 35.0 39.3 34.3 10.5 11.5
512 515 550 520 512 750 715 580 520 600 660 485 505 535 620 795 630 575 545 535 620 470 682
16.4 21.3 21.3 21.7 19.0 21.5 21.6 20.2 19.7 20.1 24.9 20.8 20.2 8.6 10.4 8.9 10.6 9.9 25.7 39.4 22.9 41.4 9.9 0 2.4
1.006 0.994 0.909 1.019 1.006 0.691 0.713 0.897 0.952 0.727 0.742 1.000 0.980 0.943 0.785 0.654 0.794 0.783 0.972 1.037 0.806 1.026 0.513
1.006 1.033 0.844 0.945 1000 1.456 1.389 1.104 1.041 1.532 1.305 1.048 1.050 1.140 1.375 I .798 2.198 1.434 0.942 0.888 1.528 0.949 3.465
-
630
-
-
0.516
4.792
Data for the blown bitumens (samples 6, 7, 10 and 11) and for the low boiling samples 23-25 deviate from those of the other samples. Data for 13 samples (1-5, 8,9, 12-14, 19, 20,22) show such a small scattering that statistical evaluation of the quotients TWITccRand GW/GccRis merited: Mean TWlTCCR GWGCR
X
0.980 0.999
Coefficient of Variation L V (%)
4.47 8.35
136
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Thus the equivalence of T, and TccR,as well as of G, and G,, has been proved. The statistical evaluation of TCCR results in a mean X = 585.9 "C with a coefficient of variaton +_ V = 14.34 %. It is well known, that measurement of the Conradson coke residue exhibits a large scattering. DIN 51 551 speaks of a repeatability of 10 % and a reproducibility of 15 % of the values. Three groups may be formally distinguished, which show a smaller scattering of the TCCk
x ("C) Group I (Samples 1-5, 8, 9, 12-14, 18-20) Group I1 (Samples 10, 11, 15, 17, 21, 25) Group I11 (Samples 6, 7, 16, 23)
525.6 626.7 735.5
*If(%,)
5.84 3.14 6.58
Groups I and I1 are in coincidence with the results given by Adony 14-12], where a temperature range from 475-650 "C is given for the coking according to Conradson. No correlation with analytical (chemical) data of the sample can be made.
4.2.3.2 Derived index numbers The non-distillable part ND = 100 - AG400 of vacuum residues and bitumens is within the limits from 56 to 89 wt%, and for atmospheric residues from 33 to 40 wt%. For the conversion products ND depends on the distillation severity after conversion. ND increases for heavy products up to more than 75 wt%. Statistical evaluation results in the following data: ~
~~~
~
Vacuum residues and bitumens Atmospheric residues
~~
x (wt %)
f V (%)
76.9 37.2
10.4 9.3
The part of the sample which can be cracked, CR = 100 - (AG400 + R800) amounts to 43-73 wt%. The lower value is due to the fact that sample 1 contains a relatively high distillable fraction (AG400 = 44 wt%). A statistical evaluation of samples 2 to 13 results in a mean of CR X = 61.8 wt% with a coefficient of variaton + V = 12.6 %. Due to the higher distillable fraction, the CR of the atmosphericresidues has lower values between 26 and 40 wt%. For the products from conversion processes which do not possess an R800 (samples 24 and 25),the CR equals the ND. The CR of the other products from conversion processes is in the limits from 12 wt%, for the residue from a thermal cracker having a very high distillable fraction (sample 18), up to 53 wt%, for a visbreaker residue (sample 21). Statistical evaluation of the ratio CR/ND, which represents the crackable portion of the non-distillable part of the sample, gives the following results:
4.2 Refinery Residues
Vacuum residues, bitumens, and atmospheric residues (Samples 1-17) Products from conversion processes (Samples 18-20 and 22)
137
x
*V(%)
0.80 0.63
5.1 4.8
The lower value of the ratio CR/ND for products from conversion processes indicates that considerable amounts of these products have already been cracked and distilled. The high value CR/ND = 0.88 for the visbreaker residue, sample 21, demonstrates on the other hand that in that case the crack conditions were very light. The Conradson coke residue in the non-distillable part of the samples (CCR/ND) . 100 is in the limits from 23 to 33 % for vacuum residues, bitumens, and atmospheric residues. The statistics result in a mean X = 27.3 % and a coefficient of variation +V = 9.6 % (relative). The products from conversion processes scatter from 33 to 58 %. The furfural extract (sample 24) stands out because it does not possess any coke residue. The data for the residue at 800 "C in the non-distillable part ND of the sample (R800/ ND) . 100 for vacuum residues, bitumens, and atmospheric residues are in the limits from 10 to 26 % with a mean X = 20.0 %. The very high coefficient of variation fV = 20.6 % indicates that statistical evaluation is nonsensical. The inaccuracies of the measurements are cumulative here. As shown in chapter 4.2.2.1, the coefficient of variation for ND is k 6.9 %, and for R800 it is k 7.4 % (maximum each), so that the scattering of (RSOOIND) . 100 could theoretically increase up to _+ 15.4 %. The residues from thermal crackers (samples 18 and 22) as well as a visbreaker residue (sample 19) and a cat cracker residue (sample 20) exhibit data far above 30 %. The high values of (CCR/ND) . 100 and (R800/ND) . 100 for these products show again, that considerable portions from these samples have already been cracked and distilled. However, samples 17,24, and 25 do not show any value of (R800IND) . 100 as they have no R800.
4.2.3.3 Simulated distillation As discussed in chapter 3.1.2 above, it is not possible to obtain an equilibrium of evaporation in thermogravimetry,because the gas flow rate is relatively fast. The layer of substance in the sample pan has a thickness of only 0.4 or 0.5 mm, so that the conditions in the TGA resemble those of a thin-layer vacuum distillation. The distillation curve of the sample at atmospheric pressure may be calculated step by step from the TGA curve by means of a linear function [4-131:
BP = a, TTG+ a2 where
BP = boiling point TTG= temperatures of a defined weight loss a,, a2 = constants depending upon the weight loss.
138
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
The constants a, and a2may be determined by calibration using pure chemicals of known boiling point. In this investigation the calibration was performed using n-alkanes from C,,H,, to C,,H,,, and chemicals mentioned in ASTM D 2887-84, Table X 1.1. Figures 4-18 to 4-25 show the simulated distillation curves of the samples. Fractions of the sample boiling below 400 "C may be separated by means of atmospheric distillation whereas the parts boiling between 400 "C and about 550 "C could be removed only by means of a vacuum distillation. The distillation curves of the vacuum residues and bitumens are shown in Figs. 4-18 to 4-20. Due to the mode of manufacture, none of the samples possesses a distillable fraction. The crackable parts amount to 60 or 70 wt% maximum. Fig. 4-21 shows the distillation curves of an atmospheric residue and the corresponding vacuum residue produced therefrom (origin Kuwait). It may clearly be seen that the vacuum distillation in the refinery has been performed at a temperature in the vicinity of the cracking region. Fig. 4-22 shows the distillation curves of the atmospheric residues (samples 14-17). Approximately 40 or 50 wt% of this samples may still be separated by means of a vacuum distillation.
Fig. 4-18 Simulated Distillation of Bitumen B45 by TG 750 Sample No. 2: Safaniya Crude Sample No. 4: Venezuela Crude
4.2 Refinery Residues
139
Fig. 4-19 Simulated Distillation of Bitumen B80 by TG 750 Sample No. 3: Agha Jari Crude Sample No. 5: Venezuela Crude Sample No. 7: Middle East Crude, Semiblown
Fig. 4-20 Simulated Distillation of Bitumen B200 by TG 750 Sample No. 9: North Sea + Arabian Light Crudes Sample No. 10: Arabian Heavy Crude
140
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products ii"C1
Fig. 4-21 Simulated Distillation of Residues from Kuwait Crude (TG 750) Sample No. 17: Atmospheric Residue Sample No. 8: Vacuum Residue
Fig. 4-22 Simulated Distillation of Atmospheric Residues (TG 750) Sample No. 14: Arabian Light Crude Sample No. 15: Kirkuk Crude Sample No. 16: Tuimaza + Arabian Heavy Crudes Sample No. 17: Kuwait Crude
4.2 Refinery Residues
141
In Fig. 4-23 the distillation curves of samples from conversion processes are shown. The fully distilled residues from a cat-cracker (sample 20) and from a thermal cracker (sample 22) do not contain any substances separable by distillation, but do contain approximately 40-50 wt% crackable substances. From the visbreaker residues (samples 19 and 21) about 20 wt% may still be separated by vacuum distillation. Obviously the residue of a thermal cracker (sample 18) has undergone only atmospheric distillation. Approximately 5 wt% may still be gained from that sample by atmospheric distillation, and an additional 65 wt% by vacuum distillation, Fig. 24 shows the distillation curves of a waxy distillate (sample 23) and the residue from a thermal cracker (sample 22). The residue has been distilled exhaustively. It still contains 50 wt% crackable substances. From the waxy distillate about 50 wt% may still be gained by vacuum distillation. The distillate from a cat-cracker (sample 25 in Fig. 4-25) contains approximately 35 or 40 wt% which may be separated by atmospheric distillation and an additional 45 or 50 wt%
Fig. 4-23 Simulated Distillation of Samples from Conversion Processes by TG 750 Sample No. 18: Residue from Thermal Cracker (Arabian Light) Sample No. 19: Residue from Visbreaker Sample No. 20: Residue from Katalytic Cracker (Kirkuk) Sample No. 21: Residue from Visbreaker (Venezuela) Sample No. 22: Residue from Thermal Cracker (Iranian Heavy)
142
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
1 T["CI
Fig. 4-24 Simulated Distillation by TG 750 Sample No. 23: Waxy Distillate (Nigeria + Libya) Sample No. 22: Residue from Thermal Cracker (Iranian Heavy)
Fig. 4-25 Simulated Distillation by TG 750 Sample No. 24: Furfural Extract Sample No. 25: Distillate from Thermal Cracker
4.2 Refinery Residues
143
separable by vacuum distillation. The furfural extract (sample 24 in Fig. 4-25) demonstrates uniform boiling behavior. In the temperature range from 435-525 "C about 85 wt% may be obtained by distillation.
4.2.3.4 Directly measured index numbers in comparison with the simulated distillation Calculation of the simulated distillation curves from thermogravimetric data demands a considerable working time, even if a suitable computer program exists. Up to 18 values have to be gathered from the TGA curve and fed into the computer. Therefore an investigation has been made, as to whether the directly measured index numbers could indicate which portions of the sample may be separated by atmospheric and vacuum distillation. As will be shown below (chapter 4.2.7) the mean of the start temperature of the crack reaction in TGA is X = 414 k 17.3 "C. Therefore the weight loss up to 400 "C experimental temperature (AG400) may be considered as the upper limit of the distillation range. Table 4-19: Weight Loss in Thermogravimetry and Corresponding Temperature of Simulated Distillation Sample No
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 arithmetic mean:
AG200 [wt %] 2.0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 7.2 4.75 6.0 5.7 6.3 4.0 0.2 3.5 0 5.0 2.6 15.75
corresp. T ["CI
450 -
-
415 430 424 449 419 448 -
443 -
427 452 284 435.7
AG300 [wt %]
corresp. T ["CI
AG400 [wt %I
corresp. T ["CI
18.0 4.25 1.7 7.25 6.1 1.2 2.5 1.1 2.0 6.2 2.25 1.45 4.5 29.75 28.5 34.0 28.5 50.0 17.0 1.5 16.0 3.25 45.5 27.75 45.5
518 582 625 567 572 646 602 581 544 558 612 637 581 495 496 494 501 470 508 560 523 609 478 498 350 552.4
44.0 22.5 20.0 32.5 29.0 11.0 19.7 12.7 28.0 37.1 26.5 16.7 29.8 62.7 60.0 65.0 59.7 82.9 46.5 23.8 40.0 23.7 70.5 92.0 92.8
608 648 658 629 634 628 660 617 624 620 636 662 628 589 590 589 597 600 630 644 610 647 565 568 -,560 617.2
144
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Comparison of the values of AG400 (Table 4-15) with the corresponding values of the simulated distillation gives a mean of the distillation temperature (reduced to atmospheric pressure) of X = 617.2 "C with a coefficient of variation ? V = 4.83 %. Such products can only be obtained by high vacuum distillation, which is not the general refinery standard. For the vacuum distillation commonly found in refineries, an upper temperature limit from 530-550 "C maximum (at atmospheric pressure) exists. For atmospheric distillation the upper temperature limit is 400-420 "C. This would correspond to the index numbers for the weight loss up to 300 "C (AG300) for the usual vacuum distillation. AG300 corresponds to a mean of the distillation temperature X = 552.4 "C ( ? V = 9.70 %). The portion which can be separated by atmospheric distillation is respresented by the weight loss up to 200 "C (AG200) which corresponds to a mean of the distillation temperature X = 435.7 "C ( k V = 3.25 %) (Table 4-19).
4.2.3.5 Derived index numbers for pracital application From the arguments in chapter 4.2.3.4 it may be deduced that while the derived index numbers of chapter 4.2.3.2, such as ND, CR, CCR/ND, and R800/ND may be of theoretical interest, other index numbers are relevant to the practice of refineries, and may also be obtained by thermogravimetry (see Tables 4-20 and 4-21). Definitions: SAR = 100 - AG200 SVR = 100 - AG300 PCR = 100 - (AG300 + R800) PCR/SVR
(CCR/SVR) . 100 (R800/SVR). 100 (GW/SVR) . 100
simulated atmospheric residue (wt%) simulated vacuum residue (wt%) "practical thermally crackable part" (wt%) "practical thermally crackable part" in the simulated vacuum residue Conradson coke residue in the simulated vacuum residue (%) residue at 800 "C in the simulated vacuum residue (%) residue in the extrapolated point of inflexion of the TGA curve in the simulated vacuum residue (%)
Table 4-20: Derived Index Numbers of Thermogravimetry in Inert Gas (I) Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
SAR=100-AG200 [wt %I
SVR=100-AG300 [wt %I
PCR=lOO-(AG300+R800) [wt %I
98.0 99.5
82.0 95.75 98.3 92.75 93.9 98.8 97.5 98.9 98.0 93.8 97.75 98.55
69.6 79.35 85.00 16.35 79.50 76.60 78.00 84.60 90.00 82.10 79.75 82.85
-
-
99.5 -
-
PCR SVR
~
0.849 0.829 0.865 0.823 0.847 0.775 0.800 0.855 0.9 18 0.875 0.816 0.841
4.2 Refinery Residues
Sample No.
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
SAR=lOO-AG200 [wt %]
SVR=lOO-AG300 [wt %]
PCR=100-(AG300+R800) [wt %]
95.5 70.25 71.5 66.0 71.5 50.0 83.0 98.5 84.0 96.75 54.5 72.25 54.5
81.80 65.25 63.20 57.00 71.50 44.50 62.00 88.50 76.90 66.05 52.50 72.25 54.5
-
92.8 95.25 94.0 95.3 93.7 96.0 99.8 96.5 100 95.0 97.4 84.25
PCR SVR ~
0.857 0.929 0.884 0.864 1.ooo 0.890 0.747 0.898 0.915 0.683 0.963 1.000 1.000
Table 4-21: Derived Index Numbers of Thermogravimetry in Inert Gas (11) Sample No.
~. CCR
100
SVR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
~. R800 SVR
100
& . 100
[%I
[%I
["/.I
20.0 22.2 21.7 23.4 20.3 21.8 22.2 20.4 20.1 21.4 25.5 21.1 21.2 12.2 14.6 13.5 14.8 19.8 31.0 40.0 27.3 42.8 18.2
15.1 17.1 13.5 16.6 15.3 19.4 20.0 14.5 8.2 12.3 18.4 15.9 14.3 7.1 11.6 13.6
20.1 23.0 21.6 22.1 20.2 31.7 30.8 24.6 20.9 33.9 33.2 22.1 22.2 14.0 20.1 24.2 32.6 28.4 29.2 35.5 41.7 40.6 62.9 14.5 21.1
-
4.4
-
11.0 25.3 10.2 8.5 31.7 3.7 -
145
146
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
The vacuum residues and bitumens (samples 1-13) no longer contain portions, which can separated by atmospheric distillation, i. e. SAR = 100 wt%, except sample 1. The four atmospheric residues (samples 14-17) possess between 92.8 and 95.25 wt% SAR. The residues from a cat-cracker (sample 20) and from a thermal cracker (sample 22) have been exhaustively distilled as the SAR of 100 wt% demonstrates. For the other products from conversion processes the SAR amounts to 84.25 wt% (distillate from the residue of a thermal cracker), and up to 97.4 wt% (furfural extract, sample 24). The SVR of the vacuum residues and bitumens (samples 2-13) has a mean X = 96.6 wt% ( k V = 2.27 %). Again sample 1 stands out from this group with SVR = 82 wt%. The atmospheric residues demonstrate a mean SVR of X = 69.8 wt% ( fV = 3.74 %). For the substances from conversion processes the SVR again depends on the degree of distillation. There SVR spreads over a range from 54.5 wt% (waxy distillate, sample 23) up to 98.5 wt% (cat-cracker residue, sample 20). The data for the PCR (part of the residue which is, in practice, crackable) of the vacuum residues and bitumens are not as uniform as the data for the SVR, due to considerable differences in their R800. Thus the PCR spreads over the range from 69.6-90 wt%. Statistical evaluation (samples 2 to 13) gives a mean X = 81.3 wt% with a coefficient of variation k V = 4.84 %. The PCR value is nearly one third higher than CR (see chapter 3.5.2.2). Higher values of the PCR have also been calculated for the atmospheric residues. For samples without any coke residue (RSOO), PCR equals SVR (samples 17, 24, and 25). The ratio PCR/SVR for vacuum residues, bitumens, and atmospheric residues amounts to X = 0.85 ( I V = 4.62 %). The clear difference found for the quotient CR/ND (see chapter 4.2.3.2) between the distillation residues and the conversion products does not hold for the ratio PCRISVR. The Conradson coke residue in the simulated vacuum residue ((CCR/SVR) . 100) for the vacuum residues and bitumens has a mean value X 21.6 % ( k V = 7.01 % relative). For the atmospheric residues the mean amounts to X = 13.8 % ( fV = 8.7 % relative). The products from conversion processes (samples 19, 20, and 22) have extremely high values demonstrating that they have been distilled exhaustively, whereas the distillate of the residue of a cat-cracker, sample 25, exhibits the extremely low value of 4.4 %. For the residue at 800 "C in the simulated vacuum residue ((RSOOISVR) . 100) there is no real differencebetween the means of samples 1- 13 (2 = 15.4 %) and samples 14- 17 (2 = 14.6 %). But here again samples 19 and 22 show considerably higher values and sample 23 a very low value. Generally the scattering of (RSOOISVR) . 100 exceeds that of (CCR/ SVK) . 100. The relation of the residue at the inflexion point of the TGA curve, to the simulated vacuum residue (G,/SVR) ' 100 for the group of the vacuum residues and bitumens shows widely differing values for blown (partly oxidized) products (samples 6, 7, 10, and 11). Statistical treatment (G,/SVR) . 100 for samples 1-13 give a mean X = 25.1 % with the very large coefficient of variation f V = 20.86 % (relative). When the blown products are excluded there is a considerably smaller scattering of results:
4.2 Refinery Residues
Mean X
Coefficient of Variation 5 V (%)
Samples No.
x (96)
&V (% of F)
1-5, 8, 9, 12, 13 6, 7, 10, 11
21.9 32.4
6.44 4.34
147
The data of (G,/SVR) . 100 for the atmospheric residues (samples 14- 17) do not demonstrate any uniformity. The products from conversion processes generally show higher values. The extremely high value for the waxy distillate is extraordinary and obviously due to the low SVR (54.5 wt%). The high values for cracker residues, which have been distilled exhaustively (samples 20, 21, 22) are understandable.
4.2.4 Thermogravimetry in air The TGA-curves of the experiments in argon are the same as those in air at lower temperatures. Differences in the slope of the curves first become noticeable in the medium temperature range starting at about 275-400 "C. The curves in air are usually shiftet to higher temperatures (Fig. 4-26, sample 8), which indicates absorption of oxygen. Sometimes a flattening of the curve occurs, as shown in Fig. 4-27, sample 11. Fig. 4-28 demonstrates that the oxidation first starts when about 55 wt% of sample 14, (atmospheric residue from Arabian Light crude) has already evaporated. The behavior of the atmospheric residue of a blend from Tuimaza and Arabian Heavy crudes (sample 16 in Fig. 429) is similar. The difference in the evaporated quantities before the start of oxidation is shown in Fig. 4-30 (visbreakerresidue, sample 21) and Fig. 4-31 (waxy distillate, sample 23). In contrast to the experiment in argon, in air, the distinct inflexion and levelling of the TGA curves in the higher temperature range does not occur. All the curves either meet the x-axis (combustion without any residue) or show a small constant residue (ash). The vast majority of DTG curves, i. e. the reaction rate, show numerous peaks (maxima) of different intensity, which are due to the evaporation losses, and at higher temperatures to multi-step oxidation reactions of the different compounds in the multi-component systems under investigation. The reaction rates (DTG) and the peak maximum temperatures of the first and the last maximum each of the DTG curves, are recorded in Tables 4-22a and 4-22b together with the temperatures of the remaining peak maxima. All the index numbers measured directly from the experiments are given in Tables 4-22a and 4-22b.
148
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Fig. 4-26 Thermogravimetry (TG 750) Sample No. 8: Vacuum Residue (Kuwait Crude) Heating Rate /3: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air 25 cm3/min
4.2 Refinery Residues
Residue ( W t - % )
I00 90
8C 7c
6C 50
LO 30
20 10
T["C 1 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
c
Fig. 4-27 Thermogravimetry (TG 750) Sample No. 11: Vacuum Residue, Semiblown (Forties + Arabian Light) Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air 25 cm3/min
149
150
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
100
90
80 70
60 50
LO
30
za 1C
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Fig. 4-28 Thermogravimetry (TG 750) Sample No. 14: Atmospheric Residue (Arabian Light) Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air 25 cm3/min
800
4.2 Refinery Residues
Fig. 4-29 Thermogravimetry (TG 750) Sample No. 16: Atmospheric Residue (Tuimaza + Arabian Heavy) Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air 25 cm3/min
151
152
4 Themoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products Residue (Wt-Z)
T["CI 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Fig. 4-30 Thermogravimetry (TG 750) Sample No. 21: Vibreaker Residue (Venezuela) Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air 25 cm3/min
860-
4.2 Refinery Residues
Fig. 4-31 Thermogravimetry (TG 750) Sample No. 23: Waxy Distillate (Nigeria + Libya) Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air 25 cm3/min
153
154
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-22a: Directly Acquired Index Numbers of the Thermogravimetry in Air I Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
T1 % [“CI
T5 % [“CI
AG400 [wt %I
180 244 226 225 235 302 268 284 27 1 240 25 1 272 236 126 137 145 172 126 153 292 144 256 150 176 96
235 308 297 283 293 365 330 339 313 283 299 35 1 289 189 200 198 218 188 215 360 213 320 202 225 149
34.3 23.0 20.2 21.5 24.5 12.3 17.3 22.6 29.2 29.5 27.5 17.9 28.8 57.0 51.3 55.3 49.7 61.0 27.5 10.8 33.0 18.0 60.2 65.5 81.7
First Maximum DTG Tmaw [%/min] [“CI
2.63 4.27 2.30 2.50 3.98 3.31 2.52 4.71 3.59 3.37 1.57 2.24 2.63 4.08 3.76 3.70 4.01 5.17 2.06 2.93 2.07 1.43 5.27 6.96 6.36
318 408 419 350 392 420 360 379 349 365 355 361 334 315 312 3 10 320 316 336 389 366 362 297 343 288
4.2 Refinery Residues
155
Table 4-2213: Directly Acquired Index Numbers of the Thermogravimetry in Air I1 Sample No.
Last Maximum DTG Tmax [%/min] roc]
TEndof experimerlt ["CI
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
8.66 6.59 7.23 4.04 7.23 9.76 6.54 9.00 6.22 7.51 6.58 6.88
562 580 577 554 542 626 582 592 545 542 543 551
620 628 630 850 59 1 656 649 619 593 570 588 580
13
10.79
536
551
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
3.25 3.60 4.10 5.07 4.07 10.20 11.13 8.27 7.29 3.61 2.69 1.78
569 560 572 533 568 575 565 517 543 542 566 588
627 640 605 595 640 648 669 539 670 600 700 647
Peaks of the DTG - Curve at T ["CI
318, 397,494, 562 408, 442, 461,477, 491, 580 419,448,496, 577 350, 370, 399, 482, 554 392,415,428,456,462,484, 542 420,492, 534, 562, 596, 626 360, 450, 503, 562, 582 379, 424, 436,470, 484, 561, 592 349,375,387,398,404,430,468,545 365, 381, 398,404,418,438,542 355, 375, 389,409, 436, 543 361, 384, 392, 402, 412, 427, 436, 447, 475, 551 334, 357, 368, 380, 396, 421, 438, 456, 536 315, 387,473, 501, 569 312, 385,447,463, 560 310, 385,448, 538, 572 320, 382,435, 444, 467, 533 316,443, 475, 568 336,411,486, 537, 557, 575 389, 460, 565 366, 378, 399, 409, 441, 448, 517 362, 391,410,428,438,466, 543 297,400, 542 343, 566 288, 588
4.2.4.1 Directly measured index numbers The temperatures of the start of an evaporation T1 % or T5 % do not differ in the experiments in air from those in argon. In any case there is a more or less pronounced evaporation before the start of oxidation. At the beginning, the TGA curves of the experiments both in air and in argon are congruent. The point where the curves separate may be regarded as the start of oxidation (Table 4-23). Losses up to 400 "C (AG400) cannot be regarded in every case as the distillable fraction of the sample. In the temperature range 300-400 "C evaporation and oxidation processes could be partly superimposed. Given that the value AG400 can be reproduced with a tolerance of t- 5 %, a real distinction of the index numbers demands a difference of at least 10 % (relative). Only the AG400 values of the following samples demonstrate a real difference between the experiments in air and in argon:
156
4 Thennoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-23: Comparison of the TGA-Curves in Argon and in Air Sample No.
Curves identical up to T ("C)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
350 405 380 340 375 435 390 335 370 360 250 420 325 380 365 365 355 280 250 425 345 380 295 340 295
sample no. 1, 4-6, 8, 10, 14-19, 21-25. The value of AG400 in air is generally smaller than in argon except for samples 6 an( This indicates the formation of oxidation products, which do not evaporate in the tempc ture range below 400 "C. This is demonstrated especially by the flattening in the Tc curves of samples 7, 11, 14, 15, and 16. The following limits of the values for AG400 h; been ascertained: AG400 (wt %) Minimum Maximum Vacuum residues and bitumens (samples 1-13) Atmospheric residues (samples 14-17) Products from conversion processes (samples 18-25)
12.3
34.3
49.7
51.3
10.8
81.7
4.2 Refinery Residues
157
Coke residue does not exist at 800 "C. All the samples were totally burnt or reduced to ash at temperatures below 800 "C. The experiments in air were terminated in the temperature range from 545 "C to 700 "C (except sample 4 at 850 "C). The arithmetical mean for the temperature of the end of the experiment is X = 619.2 "C ( V = 6.25 %). For the end of the experiment in air the following temperature limits have been found:
TEnd of ~xpenment(~~)
Vacuum residues and bitumens Atmospheric residues Products from conversion processes
Miniinurn
Maximum
550 605 545
655 640 700
The DTG curves exhibit numerous maxima of different intensity. Substances, which lose most of their weight by evaporation, exhibit only two or three oxidation peaks (samples 23, 24, 25). The other samples show between 3 and 10 peak maxima. Samples, which have a peak maximum in argon in the distillation range, also show such a maximum in air (Table 4-24):
Table 4-24: Temperature of the Distillation Maximum of the DTG Curve Sample No. 1 4 14 15 16 17 18 23 24 25
Mean X ("C) Coefficient of variation (%)
Argon ("C)
eel
Air
310 362 319 300 300 306 296 298 274 274
318 350 315 312 310 320 316 297 288 288
303.9 8.16
311.4 5.51
There is no statistical difference between the two means. The temperature of the first maximum of an oxidation peak for the samples possessing a distillation peak, also exceeds those of the other samples (Table 4-25):
158
4 Therrnoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-25: First Oxidation Maximum of Samples possessing a Distillation Maximum Sample No.
1 4 14 15 16 17 18 23 24 25
DTG (%/min)
Tm("C)
1.88 4.08 1.67 2.13 2.23 1.65 1.53 1.87 2.69 1.78
397 399 387 385 385 382 443 400 566 588
Samples 24 and 25 do not contain any substances which can be oxidized at low temperatures. Their first oxidation appears in the temperature range of the last oxidation maximum of the other samples. For the temperatures of the first oxidation maximum the following limits were found: Maximum Temperature of the 1st. Oxidation Peak of the DTG Curve Minimum Vacuum residues and bitumens (samples 1-13) Atmospheric residues (samples 14-17) Products from conversion processes (samples 18-25)
Maximum
("(3
("C)
334
420
382
387
362
443
Mean
X ("C)
Coefficient of variation _+ V ( % )
381.4 397.9 384.8
7.65 7.36 0.54
395.2
7.63
Statistical evaluation shows the following results: Maximum Temperature of the 1st. Oxidation Peak
Statistics over samples 1-25 Vacuum residues and bitumens (samples 1-13) Atmospheric residues (samples 14- 17) Products from conversion processes (samples 18-25)
There is no statistical difference between the four means.
4.2 Refinery Residues
159
The maxima of the weight loss rate DTG of the first oxidation peak were found in the following limits: DTG (%/min) of the 1st. Oxidation Peak Minimum
Maximum ~
Vacuum residues and bitumens (samples 1-13) Atmospheric residues (samples 14-17) Products from conversion processes (samples 18-25)
1.88
4.7 1
1.65
2.23
1.53
2.93
The last oxidation peaks were measured in the temperature range from 517-626 "C. The statistical evaluation demonstrates a scattering of the data around 560 "C for most of the samples: Maximum Temperature of the Last Oxidation Peak ~
Coefficient of variation +v(%)
Mean
X ("C) ~
Statistics over samples 1-25 Vacuum residues and bitumens (samples 1-13) Atmospheric residues (samples 14-17) Products from conversion processes (samples 18-25)
562.1
4.50
561.2
3.70
558.5
3.18
558.0
4.04
Again, there is no difference between the four means. The values of the maxima of weight loss rate of the last oxidation peak are in the range from 4.04 to 11.13 %/min. Comparison of the temperatures of the crack peak of the DTG curves from the experiments in argon (Table 4-15) with last column of table 4-22b demonstrates that nearly all those samples also show a peak at corresponding temperatures. This indicates competition between cracking and oxidation reactions. Determination of ash using a thermobalance is not advisable due to the very low contents, between 0.01 and 0.9 wt%. An additional experiment with a larger sample weight and/or extension of the measuring range is necessary.
160
4 Thennoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
4.2.5 Correlations of analytical data with index numbers from thermogr avimetry The correlation of the analytical data of the samples with index numbers from thermogravimetry may be examined. The regression line (curve), R, and a zero point line (curve), Z, as well as the coefficients of correlation r, have been calculated using the least squares method. The following tables show the relationship between some of the thermoanalytical index numbers and: the average relative particle masses (average molecular weight) (Tables 4-26 and 4-30); the average C-number ZC (Tables 4-27 and 4-30); the colloidal composition (Table 4-28); and data from the structural groups analysis (Table 4-29). Since all the samples in this investigation are multicomponent systems, the coefficients of correlation found were less than one. Index numbers not listed here did not show significant correlation with the analytical data.
Table 4-26: Correlation of thermoanalyticalindex numbers with the averaqe relative particle size % (Experiments in argon) No.
Function
1 2 3 4 5
T1 % = 0.260 x @ T5 % = 0.225 x M + 93 AG400 = 172.9 x gp(-0.00193 x R 800 = 0.01572M CR = 0.0624 x M-2.331
Type of Curve
Coefficient of Correlation
Z R R Z R
0.873 0.896 0.917 0.852 0.891
R = Regression line (curve)
Z = Zero point line (curve)
Table 4-27: Correlation of thermoanalytical index numbers with the average carbon number ZC (Experiments in argon) No.
Function
6 7 8 9
T1 % = 4.004 x ZC T5 % = 3.588 x ZC+84.16 AG400 = 184.6 x exp(-0.0315 CR = 1.055 x ZC - 6.80
x
ZC)
Type of Curve
Coefficient of Correlation
Z R R R
0.899 0.890 0.906 0.882
4.2 Refinery Residues
161
Table 4-28: Correlation of thermoanalytical index numbers with the colloidal composition (Experiments in argon) DP= wt - % Dispersion medium Asph= wt - % Asphaltenes H= wt - % Petroleum resins Mal= wt - % Maltenes = wt- % DP + H No.
Function
10 11 12 13 14 15
AG 400 = 1.895 x DP - 106.63 R 800 = 0.625 x Asph + 2.57 R 800 = 0.563 x (Asph + H) CR = 3.723 x H + 24.91 CR = 71.62 x exp(-0.0197 x (DPIH)) PCR = 0.721 x Ma1 + 57.31
Type of curve
Coefficient of Correlation
R R Z R R
0.921 0.751 0.739 0.774 0.827 0.751
R
Table 4-29: Correlation of thermoanalytical index numbers with values of the structural groups analysis (Experiments in argon) No.
Function
Type of curve
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
RSOO = 75.83 x H/C + 123.8 CR = 118.1 x CA/(CN + CP) R800 = 0.941 x CA + 17.9 G, = 5.093 x RA + 5.755 G, = - 74.593 x H/C + 129.751 G,/SVR = 3.876 x R A + 13.071 G,/SVR = 0.732 x CA -+ 2.853 G,/SVR = - 85.455 x HIC + 149.57
Coefficient of Correlation
0.938 0.662 0.887 0.720 0.711 0.500 0.522 0.640
Table 4-30: Correlation of thermoanalytical index numbers with the average relative particle size ?@ (Experiments in air) No.
Function
24 25 26
T1 % = 0.2616 x T5 % = 0.1992 x ?@ + 114.0 AG 400 = 135.0 x exp (-0.001868
x
Type of curve
Coefficient of Correlation
Z R R
0.878 0.879 0.893
162
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-31: Correlation of thermoanalytical index numbers with the average carbon number ZC (Experiments in air) ~
No.
Function
27 28 29
T1 % = 3.963 x ZC T5 % = 2.882 x ZC + 121.5 AG 400 = 148.2 x exp (-0.0304 x ZC)
~~~
Type of curve
Coefficient of Correlation
Z R R
0.832 0.824 0.850
4.2.6 Simulated thermal cracking by TGA In order to simulate the thermal cracking process, samples of about 5 mg weight were heated in the Stanton-Redcroft thermobalance ThISD in an argon atmosphere up to 600 "C
I
3
5
7
Fig. 4-32 Pattern of Simulated Cracking in Argon by TG 750 Heating Rate p : 100 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min
Time (inin)
163
4.2 Refinery Residues
using a rapid heating rate of 100 K/min. A scheme of the recorder diagram is shown in Fig. 4-32. Curve 1 represents the signal from the thermocouple directly below the sample pan; curve 2, the sample weight AG; and curve 3, the DTG signal. Samples which still have distillable fractions, give an additional shoulder before the maximum of the DTG curve. In Table 4-33 the following index numbers are listed: Evaporation: Maximum of evaporation rate Temperature of the evaporation maximum Weight loss at T,
DTG,
(% /min)
TV
("C) (wt%)
GV
Cracking process: Maximum of cracking rate Temperature of the cracking maximum Residue at T, Final temperature Residue at final temperature
DTG, TC RC
(%/min) ("C) (wt%) ("C) (wt%)
TE
RE
Table 4-33: Index numbers of the Simulated Thermal Cracking Evaporation Sample DTG, No. (%/mi@
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~~~
25.74
Cracking Process
Tv ("C)
GV (wt%)
454 -
37
-
14.20
388
17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
31.39 27.89 32.12 33.88 56.84 23.38
417 398 416 406 396 406
-
-
44 36 44 41 60 32
25.77
423
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
57.00 76.87 66.10
386 408 377
56 72 73
~
* Preset final temperature of the instrument
DTG, (%/min) 34.83 63.62 61.80 58.89 65.26 86.17 64.00 92.45 100.00 72.95 69.70 80.33 71.33 40.54 48.78 37.72 48.34 -
39.36 56.14 43.53 49.94
TC ("C)
RC (wt%)
547 545 559 537 524 533 561 533 530 520 526 516 555 522 517 533 505
32 30 28 43 34 36 33 29 32 34 37 40 32 20 19
509 547 507 510
33 48 36 57
-
-
20 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
TE*
RE
(C)
(wt%)
593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 593 592 593 593 593
20 14 12 20 18 16 17 11 12 15 19 19 14 8 8 8 7 1 20 29 22 0 1 0 1
164
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
The repeatability of the experimental data is very good. The means and the coefficients of variation from ten experiments with sample 11 are shown in table 4-32 Table 4-32: Repeatability of the Index Numbers -
DTG, TC RC TE RE
(%/min) ("C) (wt%) ("C)
(wt%)
X
+_V(%)
69.70 528.3 36.8 529.9 19.3
6.12 1.59 2.02 0.37 8.15
4.2.6.1 Index numbers from simulated cracking The data from the simulated cracking process may also be assembled in groups. Statistical evaluation of the groups A: vacuum residues and bitumens (samples 1-13), B: atmospheric residues (samples 14-17), and C: products from conversion processes which can be cracked under the given experimental conditions (samples 19-22) is shown in table 4-34: Table 4-34: Statistical evaluation of the simulated cracking process Group
A
B C
Samples
1-13 14-17 19-22
DTG,
Tc
536.7 522.0 518.3
3.04 1.81 3.67
74.58 43.84 46.88
RC
6.72 13.10 16.29
33.5 19.7 45.8
11.32 2.94 26.3
There is a statistical difference between the mean of the maximum cracktemperature,TC of groups A and B, and between groups A and C. No such difference exists between the means of groups B and C. The comparativelyhigh coefficients of variation of the means of DTG, of groups B and C, prove that they are far too inhomogeneous for a statistical evaluation. The same goes for the mean of R, of group C. For the samples showing only one evaporation range (samples l8,23-25), the statistics give a mean of T,, X = 392.3 "C ( fV = 4.16 %). The maximum of the evaporation rate DTG, has a mean X = 64.20 %/min ( + V = 14.18 %). For the samples which demonstrate two maxima, or a shoulder and a maximum, the values found for each of the reactions are relatively low. The measured data are by definition related to the initial sample weight, and are therefore interdependent (Table 4-35):
4.2 Refinery Residues
165
Table 4-35: Simulated cracking at 600 "C, Samples with two maxima Sample No.
DTG, [%/min]
1 3 14 15 16 17 19 21 ~
X
V
DTG, [%/min]
"a
TC
DTG, + DTG, [%/mi111
547 559 522 517 533 505 505 507
60.57 76.00 71.93 76.67 69.84 82.22 62.74 68.80
25.74 14.20 3 1.39 27.89 32.12 33.88 23.30 25.27
448 388 417 398 416 406 406 423
34.83 61.80 40.54 48.78 37.72 48.34 39.36 43.53
28.52* k 13.95 %
417.75 k 4.34 %
41.87*
524.9
71.10
f 12.61 %
f 3.78 %
f 10.18 %
* excluding sample 3 The sum of DTG,+ DTG, (F= 71.10) is now of the order of magnitude of the DTG, values of bitumens and vacuum residues which have only one crack maximum.
4.2.6.2 Correlation of index numbers from simulated cracking with analytical data The following data may be correlated: - Weight loss at the maximum of evaporation AGv with the concentration of dispersion
medium, DP: AGv = 0.8506 . DP - 34.2877 Coefficient of correlation r = 0.904
Evaporation rate (maximum) DTG, with the concentration of dispersion medium DP: DTG, = 5.5750 . DP - 189.4960 Coefficient of correlation r = 0.834 - Residue at the end of experiment RE with the concentration of asphaltenes ( sph): RE = 0.5603 . Asph + 3.9124 Coefficient of correlation r = 0.793 - Residue at the end of experiment, RE with the Conradson coke residue, CCR: RE = 0.6324 . CCR + 1.3637 Coefficient of correlation r = 0.801 The coefficients of correlation are high enough to confirm the general trend. -
166
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
4.2.7 Start temperature of the cracking process in an inert atmosphere The slope and behavior of the TGA curve does not give clear indication whether a distillation weight loss is continuing or whether the sample has already been cracked, but the start temperature of the cracking reaction may be determined from the DTG cu-ve by the method of Z. Adony [4-141. In the diagram of log DTG versus the inverse Kelvin temperature, 1/T, a straight line characterizes the distillation range. The temperature of departure from the straight line indicates the start of the cracking reaction. Table 4-36 reproduces the results of such an evaluation of the experiments in argon with a heating rate p= 10 K / i i n . For the start temperature of the cracking reaction, TB, a mean X = 414.16 "C with a coefficient of correlation k V = 4.19 % was calculated, The value 400 "C chosen empirically for the end of the distillation (boiling) range AG400 is confirmed by this evaluation. Table 4-36:Start temperature of the cracking reaction TB ("C) Thermogravimetry in Argon p= 10 K/min Sample No
TB ["Cl
~
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (A): Evaporation peak alone (B): Data for the second DTG peak n. e.: non evaluable
414 (B) 412 396 408.5 (B) 405 423 428.5 43 1 402.5 426 371 -
-
437.5 (B) 406 (B) n. e. 444 (B) 252 (A) 402.5 (B) 419 n. e. n. e. n. e. 322 (A) 238 (A)
4.2 Refinery Residues
167
4.2.8 Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) The DSC experiments were carried out to evaluate the kinetics of the pyrolysis (crack) reaction of the samples. They were performed using a DuPont 990 Thermal Analyzer equipped with a pressure DSC cell and a twin pen x-y-recorder. Evaluation was carried out externally. The experiments were carried out according to ASTM E 698-79, and evaluated by the method set out in chapter X3 of the ASTM E 698-79. Sample sizesbetween 1.5 and 4 mg were used and DuPont SFI aluminium sample pans were used to avoid any creeping of the sample over the side of the pan. Three heating rates pof 10,20, and 50 K/min were applied. If one of the measured data did not fit the straight line in the diagram log pversus 1 000/T an additional experiment was carried out at a heating rate p= 5 K/min. Parallel experiments have shown that quite fast heating rates may be applied to pyrolysis reactions, provided that the sample size is small, so that there is no inteinal temperature gradient. In contrast to this behavior, effects due to melting, crystallization, or oxidation measurements may be overtaken and obscured if fast heating rates are used, and may not appear in the recorded diagram. The experiments were carried out in argon at atmospheric pressure, and in methane at 10 bar pressure, using a gas flow rate of 5 cm3/min each. For samples possessing an additional evaporation peak (T < 400 "C) before the cracking reaction (temperature range from 450-550 "C) both peaks were evaluated. The activation energy calculated for the evaporation is equal to the enthalpy of vaporization (see chapter 3.3.2). Pyrolysis reactions of mixtures of hydrocarbons result in the formation of volatile products (gas and vapor) as well as solid residues (coke). The degree of conversion U of the reaction may be determined only by weighing the sample and pan before and after the reaction: U=
initial weight - residual weight . 100 (%) initial weight
4.2.8.1 Experiments in argon at atmospheric pressure The experiments were performed in argon at 1 bar pressure and a gas flow rate of 5 cm3/min. Four of the 25 samples (samples 18, 23-25) show only one maximum in the temperature range from 275 "C to 400 OC, and this represents a distillation process. Fourteen samples (samples 2-13, 20-22) possess only one maximum each in the temperature range from 450 "C to 550 "C, which clearly represents a pyrolysis reaction. The remaining six samples (samples 1, 14-17, 19) show two maxima, one each in the distillation range and the pyrolysis range. The coefficients of the Arrhenius equation, activation energy E and frequency (pre-exponential) factor A are presented in Table 4-37:
168
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-37: DSC in 1 bar Argon Sample No.
Vaporization E, [kJ/Mol] log A, [min-'1
5.971 -
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Cracking reaction E, [kJ/Mol] log A, [min-'I
-
-
5.258 11.372 6.224 10.449 14.134 6.120 -
-
40.3 70.3 59.7
2.969 5.400 5.063
82.8 78.7 81.5 79.7 82.0 69.2 69.9 77.1
226.7 204.4 165.9 211.6 197.4 235.9 159.8 181.5
15.973 14.390 11.492 14.903 13.707 16.577 10.975 12.560 -
-
180.6 215.8 167.3 174.1 171.4 177.1 174.2 187.0
12.514 17.927 18.538 12.123 11.827 12.341 12.237 13.038
206.8 217.0 190.4 199.6
14.542 9.855 11.299 13.707
69.5 68.2 79.1 78.4 83.9 84.8 84.1 77.1 85.5 76.1 63.8 72.0 63.6 100 100 100
-
61.7 125.4 71.1 124.0 171.9 76.1
U [%I
-
-
-
-
-
-
Statistical evaluation of the peak maximum temperatures of the pyrolysis reaction give coefficients of variation +V = 1.18 % maximum of the corresponding mean for each heating rate. Therefore the means of the peak maximum temperatures may justifiably be used to calculate the average values of the coefficients of the Arrhenius equation: Cracking reaction: Average values Activation energy E, = 190.6 kJ/Mol Frequency factor log A , = 13.339 min-' The arithmetical means calculated from the individual data of Table 4-37 are insignificantly larger in number, without any significant statistical difference. But their coefficients of variation are considerably larger: Cracking reaction: Means and coefficients of variation Activation Energy E, = 192.2 kJ/Mol *V = 11.35 % Frequency factor log A , = 13.529 min-' _+ V = 17.18 % There is no statistical difference between the average values and the means (t < t 0.95).
169
4.2 Refinery Residues
Only one of the vacuum residues (sample 1) has a substantial evaporizable fraction, as has already been shown using thermogravimetry (T1 % = 181 'C, T5 % = 237 'C, AG400 = 44 wt%). The boiling point, calculated from the DSC peak maximum temperatures and reduced to atmospheric conditions, is 410 "C. Each of the four atmospheric residues has an evaporizable fraction with the following temperatures for the evaporation maxima: Sample
DSC Peak maximum temperature ("C)
No.
10 k/min
20 K/min
50 K/min
Corresponding mean Boiling point (" C)
14 15 16 17
275 287 275 325
317.5 304.5 297.5 337
340 320 330 363
368 360 356 408
~
The distillation residues of these samples pyrolyze in the temperature range between 450 "C and 500 "C exhibiting a relative low energy of activation E, of approximately 177 kJ/Mol. The residue of a thermal cracker (sample 18) seems to demonstrate losses only by distillation since the peak maxima were found in the temperature range 350-380 "C. Those temperatures are very low for a pyrolysis reaction, whereas the activation energy E = 172 kJ/Mole could represent a substance which is either easily crackable or tough volatile. The residue at 800 "C in thermogravimetry (R8OO = 5.5 wt%) and the conversion in DSC (U= 85.5 %) could result from either type of reaction. In this case it is a disadvantage that the instrument does not permit identification of the products formed. The residue of a visbreaker (sample 19) exhibits a distillable fraction. The corresponding boiling point is 420 "C. The residue therefrom pyrolyzes between 450 "C and 490 "C. In the thermogravimetric experiment no DTG maximum was found in the distillation range. Samples 23-25 already designated as low boiling substances, by thermogravimetry, also distill totally at temperatures far below the pyrolysis range in the DSC. The corresponding boiling points are: Sample No.
Substance
23 24 25
waxy distillate furfural extract distillate from a catalytic cracker
DSC Peak maximum temperature ("C) 10 K/min 20 K/min 50 K/min
Corresponding mean boiling point ("C)
290 335
327.5 362.5
388 403
401 443
275
317.5
340
367
DSC peak maximum temperatures (at 10 K/min heating rate) in the distillation range agree quite well with the temperatures of the corresponding DTG maximum from thermo-
170
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
gravimetry. Comparison between the DSC maximum temperatures in the pyrolysis (crack) range and the corresponding DTG maximum temperatures shows complete agreement: Peak maximum temperatures of the pyrolysis reaction DSC (20 samples) X = 456.3 "C +V = 0.94 % DTG (20 samples) X = 458.4 "C +V = 3.28 % The considerable differences in the coefficients of the Arrhenius equation (Table 4-37) lead to different half-life times at identical temperatures. In Fig. 4-33 the plots of half-life time as a function of temperature (1 000/T) of the samples with maximum, minimum, and average values of the kinetic coefficients are shown:
1,70
1.60
1.50
1,40
130 1.20
1.10
1,oo
Fig. 4-33 Half Life Time t1,2 of Pyrolysis in 1 bar Argon Sample No. 6: E = 235.9 kJ/Mol; logA = 16.577 min-I Sample No. 7: E = 159.8kJ/Mol; logA = 10.975 min-' Mean Values (22 Samples): E = 190.6 k.J/Mol; lo@ = 13.339 min-'
4.2 Refinery Residues
Maximum: sample 6 Minimum: sample 7 Average
E, (kJ/Mol)
log A, (min-')
235.9 159.8 190.6
16.577 10.975 13.339
171
At a pyrolysis temperature of 450 "C there are no differences in the half-life time. Towards lower temperatures ( < 400 "C) and higher temperatures ( > 500 "C) the differences become evident. The coefficients of the Arrhenius equation determined in this manner, are the basic data for the calculation of the kinetics of pyrolysis (crack) reactions and therefore also the basis for the choice of process conditions, such as pre-setting of reactor temperatures, residence times etc. in thermal conversion processes. The residue R, measured at the end of reaction corresponds closely to the amounts of coke G,, which were found using thermogravimetry, with the exception of the data for samples 14 and 15 (atmospheric residues) and 21 and 22 (conversion products). There is a strong linear relation of R, (residues from the DSC experiments in inert gas at 1 bar pressure) with G, residual weight at the point of inflexion of the TGA curve:
R, = 0.9275 G, + 1.4 Coefficient of correlation r = 0.9989 Determination of the temperatures in the TGA curve, which correspond to the residual weight R, of the DSC experiment, shows a very narrow scattering of the data. Statistical evaluation of the data from samples 1-13, 16, 17, and 22, gives X = 508.6 "C fV = 2.88 %. This temperature corresponds roughly to the temperature of the formation of the Conradson coke residue. Samples which do not comply with this are: 14 and 15 (472 "C), sample 18 (443 "C), samples 19 (545 "C), 20 (547 "C), and 21 (565 "C), where the latter three represent residues from crackers. These samples show similar behavior of their temperatures at the point of inflexion Tw of the TGA curves. If the residues after the end of the DSC experiments are compared with the aromacity of the samples (H/C), a clear trend emerges that increasing H/C ratios lead to decreasing residues R,.
4.2.8.2 Experiments in methane at 10 bar pressure In order to simulate the process parameters of thermal cracking in the refinery better experiments were carried out in a hydrocarbon atmosphere (methane) at 10 bar pressure. This corresponds to the maximum pressure of the gas supply. The experimental conditions were again: heating rates p of 5, 10, 20, and 50 K/min, sample sizes from 1.0 to 4.0 mg, and gas flow rates of 5 cm3/min. Increase in the pressure leads to an increase of the peak maximum temperatures in the distillation (evaporation) range by up to 60 "C, whereas the peak maximum temperatures of the pyrolysis reaction can decrease by 10 "C.
172
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
The peak maximum temperatures of the pyrolysis (cracking) reaction (450-485 "C) differ so little that for each heating rate a coefficient of variation fV = 1.08 % of the corresponding mean has been calculated. Calculation of the kinetic coefficients using ASTM E 698-79 gives the following average values: Cracking process: Average values E, = 228.6 kJ/Mol log A, = 16.307 min-' From the individual values of the kinetic coefficients in Table 4-38, an arithmetic mean with considerably larger coefficients of variation is derived by statistical evaluation: Cracking process: Means and Coefficients of Variation E, = 237.8 kJ/Mol k V = 12.61 % log A, = 16.901 min-' V = 14.19 %
*
There is no statistical difference between the averages and the means. During the vaporization process, it is striking that the "enthalpy" increases considerably, sometimes much more than the Clausius-Clapeyron law leads us to expect. Vaporization will naturally become more difficult when the pressure is increased, but there is no explanation for an increase by a factor of 5 or 6. Therefore data of samples 14,24, and 25 seem to be anomalous. Pyrolysis also becomes more difficult with increasing pressure. That is logical, because pyrolysis is a reaction resulting in an increase in volume, due to the formation of crack gases or volatile products and coke. The activation energy of sample 18 (residue from a thermal cracker) rises froin 171.9 kJ/Mol at normal pressure to 187.2 kJ/Mol at 10 bar pressure. This increase of only 10 % indicates that a pyrolysis reaction occurs even at 1 bar pressure, especially since the peak maximum temperatures hardly shift. Sample 19 (visbreaker residue) does not exhibit a vaporization peak under these conditions. The plot of log half-life time of the cracking reaction versus the inverse Kelvin temperature (1 OOOlr) once more shows straight lines (Fig. 4-34). The slope of the line is determined by the value of the activation energy. The half-life times of the samples possessing the maximum and minimum values of the kinetic coefficients, as well as the average values were plotted.
Maximum: sample no. 12 Minimum: sample no. 14 Average:
E, (kJ/Mol)
log A /(min-')
288.4 197.7 228.6
20.386 13.394 16.307
The plot demonstrates clearly that in the temperature range from approximately 450470 "C there is no difference in the half life time, whereas the difference at lower temperatures ( < 400 "C) and at higher temperatures ( > 550 "C) becomes significant.
4.2 Refinery Residues
170
1,60
1,SO
1,bO
130 1.20
1,lO
173
1,oo
Fig. 4-34 Half Life Time t,,2 of Pyrolysis in 10 bar Methane Sample No. 12: E = 288.4 kJ/Mol; logA = 20.386 min-I Sample No. 14: E = 197.7 kJ/Mol; logA = 13.894 min-' Mean Values (22 Samples): E = 228.6 kJ/Mol; log = 16.307 -1
When considering technical processes, the behavior below a temperature of 400 "C is not have as much practical importance. Generally the half-life times of the reactions in methane at 10 bar pressure are shifted towards higher values, corresponding to the higher values of the activation energy and the frequency factor. The pyrolysis reaction in methane at 10 bar pressure demonstrates average values of the activation energy and frequency factor which are approximately 20 % higher than the values from the reaction in argon at 1 bar pressure. Again the trend may be recognized that a decreasing aromacity of the sample (increasing quotient H/C) leads to a decreasing residue (coke).
174
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
4.2.8.2.1 Reaction enthalpy from tests at 10 bar pressure Integration of the peak area can be used to determine the reaction enthalpy. Theoretically the enthalpy should be independent of the heating rate but this is not so in practice. An increase of the heating rate usually leads to an increase of the observed reaction enthalpy. The shift of the baseline during the reaction causes uncertainties in the exact fixing of the integration limits, and renders the integration more difficult. For this reason the crack enthalpies listed in table 4-39 should be treated with suspicion. Crack enthalpies H, from the experiments in 10 bar methane with a heating rate p= 10 K/min are shown. Samples which do not exhibit a pyrolysis peak were omitted (samples 18 and 23-25). Samples which have undergone a distillative weight loss do not conform because the enthalpy is related to the inilial sample weight and not to the residue after the evaporation (samples 1 and 14-17). Supposing that distillative losses only appear up to a temperature of 400 "C and that the crack process first starts above this temperature, it is reasonable to relate the crack enthalpy to the quantity of sample still present at 400 "C. This value has to be found by thermogravimetry. The value H: calculated in this way is listed in column 3 of the Table 4-39. Table 4-38: DSC in 10 bar Methane Sample No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Cracking reaction Vaporization E, [kJ/Mol] log A, [min-'1 E, w/Mol] log A, [min-'1
155.2 -
12.260 -
272.5 243.0
20.010 17.075
80.9 79.3
227.0 214.5 271.9 260.3 232.4 214.2 275.2 231.8 288.4 218.1 197.7 181.3 210.4 260.3
16.066 15.104 19.048 18.396 16.419 14.977 20.040 18.360 20.386 15.411 13.894 11.286 15.018 18.393
231.8 235.8 210.3 279.1
16.915 16.637 14.863 19.719
80.3 81.1 70.5 71.1 76.2 78.4 70.3 70.4 78.0 77.2 84.3 84.2 85.0 76.5 86.0 77.8 64.9 71.0 64.2 100 100 100
-
-
-
373.8 153.3 271.6 145.6 187.2
33.077 13.369 24.326 12.378 15.477
-
-
105.0 406.2 308.7
8.691 34.537 27.513
u [%I
-
-
-
-
-
-
4.2 Refinery Residues
175
Table 4-39: Enthalpy of pyrolysis in 10 bar methane Heating rate p= 10K/min H, [mJ/mgl: R400 [%I: H*, [mJ/mgl: Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Enthalpy of pyrolysis related to initial weight Residue at 400 "C Enthalpy of pyrolysis related to R400 HC
R400
H*C
202 1264
56 78 81 68 71 89 81 88 70 64 73 82 70 37 40 35 40
361 1621
-
598 230 1244 956 356 892 450 385 447 341 438 314 235 213 -
358 369 488 392
-
52 76 60 77
-
880 323 1398 1180 404 1274 704 527 545 487 1184 785 672 532 -
689 485 813 508
4.2.8.3 Start temperatures of the cracking process at different pressures The start temperature of evaporation and of pyrolysis reaction may be defined by means of the onset temperature, which is itself defined as the temperature of the intersection of the tangents to the two branches of the curve, which have different slopes. The small drift of the curve of energy versus temperature introduces errors in the determination of the onset temperatures of evaporation events. For the experiment in methane at 10 bar pressure the onset temperatures and the peak maximum (minimum) temperatures of the evaporation are sometimes, quite close, due to the mode of determination (table 4-40):
176
4 Thennoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-40: Onset temperatures of the evaporation ("C) Sample No.
1 bar Ar
1 14 15 16 17 20 23 24 25
10 bar CH, -
320 270 287 280 275 375 247 220 175
275 320 285 317 382
The start temperature of the pyrolysis reaction may in all cases be clearly ascertained. The onset temperatures of the experiments in 1 bar argon fall between 390-422 "C and for the experiments in 10 bar methane, from 392-420 "C. Statistical evaluation gives small coefficients of variation (Table 4-41). Table 4-41: Onset temperatures of the pyrolysis reaction
Experiments in 1 bar argon Experiments in 10 bar methane
x ("C)
kV(%)
402.7 403.8
2.37 1.87
There is no statistical difference between the two means. The empirical designation of the upper limit of the temperature for the distillation (evaporation) range, as 400 "C has been confirmed by the experimental results. Therefore the weight loss up to 400 "C (AG400) may be regarded as a distillative loss, which will be followed by the weight loss due to cracking of the sample in the temperature range above 400 "C. The temperatures in Table 4-41 show good correlation with the start temperature of the cracking reaction found by thermogravimetry TB= 412.2 "C (see chapter 4.2.7).
4.2.8.4 Correlation of kinetic parameters with analytical data An attempt to correlate the kinetic parameters of the pyrolysis reaction with analytical data was only partly successful. A fairly high coefficient of correlation r was found for the relation of the activation energy E with the concentration of paraffin bonded carbon (CP) in the samples: in 1 bar argon: E = -0.3268 . CP + 339.0 in 10 bar methane: E = -0.3185 . CP + 375.5
r = 0.8659
r = 0.8702
4.2 Refinery Residues
177
Correlation of the activation energy with the components of the colloidal system, demonstrates a distinct relation with the concentration of the dispersion medium. The plot of activation energy E versus the concentration of dispersion medium DP [E = f(DP)] shows two straight lines with different slopes for each reaction in 1 bar argon and in 10 bar methane. The experiments in argon at 1 bar pressure show, in addition, a group of six samples, which gives a mean X with a small coefficient of variation kV. This mean is found in the plot, below the line with the lesser slope. Table 4-42 shows which samples appear on which line in Fig. 4-35 (experiments in 1 bar argon) and in Fig. 4-36 (experiments in 10 bar methane) as well as which samples form the group. Four samples, which are found on line no. I in the experiments at 1 bar argon, are also there in the experiments at 10 bar methane. But only six samples were found to stay on the same line 11, both in 1 bar argon and 10 bar methane (samples 2, 4, 5 , 11, 15, 21). No systematic causal relationship could be found. Statistical evaluation of the six samples forming the group in the experiments in 1 bar argon gives: -
+V 5.05 % 3.45 %
X
activation energy E dispersion medium
171.33 kT/Mol 68.6 wt%
Table 4-42: Distribution of the samples in Fig. 4-35 and Fig. 4-36
Line No. I 1 6 19 20
Experiments in 1 bar argon Line No. I1 Group 2 4 5 11 14
Experiments in 10 bar methane Line No. I Line No. II
3 7 8 10 12 13
!5
1 6 7 10 12 14 16 17 19 20 22
16 17 18 21 22
2 4 5 8 9 11 13
15 21
The coefficients of the equation of the line E = a DP + b in the Fig. 4-35 and Fig. 4-36 are listed in Table 4-43: Table 4-43: Coefficients u and b and coefficient of correlation r 1 bar argon
10 bar methane
Line No.
I
I1
I
I1
U
-7.29 805.54 0.8109
-1.23 286.17 0.9706
-2.93 482.46 0.8415
-1.72 341.27 0.8643
b r
178
160
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
mean o f s i x samples
4 1 30
, ( , , , , , , , , , , , ( , , ( , , ( , , , , , , , , , ( /
40
50
70
60
80
90
/
,
(
1
%DP
Fig. 4-35 Pyrolysis of Bitumen in 1 bar Argon Activation Energy E versus Concentration of Dispersion Medium
Correlation of the activation energy with the concentration of maltenes (dispersion medium + petroleum resins) shows a similar trend, i. e. decrease of the activation energy with increase of the concentration of maltenes. Only one line is produced for each pressure range and the coefficients of correlation are considerably lower, so the numerical values are not listed. It is common knowledge that the dispersion medium contains the highest content of compounds with aliphatic (paraffinic) bonds. Correlations of the activation energy E with the concentration of dispersion medium DP as well as with the carbon in paraffinic bond CP demonstrate clearly, that pyrolysis starts with the aliphatic (paraffinic) C-C-bonds.
4.2 Refinery Residues
179
10
Fig. 4-36 Pyrolysis of Bitumen in 10 bar Methane Activation Energy E versus Concentration of Dispersion Medium
The less distinct correlation of the activation energy with the concentration of maltenes is not contradictory, because the content of petroleum resins in the maltenes includes a corresponding concentration of aromatic compounds. Those aromatics could not be pyrolyzed under the current experimental conditions, however aliphatic side chains of substituted aromatics are pyrolysed. This theory is supported by comparison of the contents of the dispersion medium or the maltenes with the conversion during the DSC experiments. The ratio of the conversion in 1 bar argon to the concentration of dispersion medium (Table 4-44) has a value well above one for the vacuum residue and bitumens, showing a mean 2 = 1.14 (+V = 7.24 %). The
180
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
value for the semiblown residue from Kirkuk crude (sample 6) is only 0.88. The same is true for the reaction in 10 bar methane. Here a mean X = 1.11 ( -t V = 7.48 %) was found. Again sample 6 has a low value of 0.89. Table 4-44: Means of the ratios Conversion: Concentration of Dispersion medium
Samples Vacuum residues and bitumens samples 1-5, 7-13 Atmospheric residues samples 14-17 Products from conversion processes samples 18-22
-
X
Reaction in 1 bar argon i V
Reaction in 10 bar methane
-
X
iV
1.14
7.24
1.11
7.48
0.93
1.82
0.93
1.14
0.90
7.28
0.91
6.79
All the products from conversion processes (samples 18-22) show ratios well below one. Only the waxy distillate (sample 23) has a value of 1.03. The atmospheric residues (samples 14-17) demonstrate the same mean of the quotient, X = 0.93, for the reactions both in argon and in methane. The high weight loss due to evaporation may have influenced the values of the ratio. There is no statistical difference between the means of the atmospheric residues and of the products from conversion processes. But a difference does exist between these two means and the mean of the vacuum residues and bitumens. The ratio of the conversion to the concentration of maltenes demonstrates similar results (Table 4-45): Table 4-45: Means of the quotients Conversion: Concentration of maltenes
Samples Vacuum residues and bitumens samples 1-5, 7-13 Atmospheric residues samples 14-17 Products from conversion processes samples 18-22
-
X
Reaction in 1 bar argon f V (%)
Reaction in 10 bar methane X +V (%) ~
1.02
6.59
1.oo
7.80
0.89
4.07
0.89
4.39
0.88
6.78
0.88
6.34
Here again samples 6 (0.82) and 23 (1.02) do not conform to the group. Formally a ratio > 1indicates that a higher than the total quantity of dispersion medium (maltenes) present in the sample has been converted. On the contrary a ratio < 1.O indicates that a conversion was less than the total quantity of dispersion medium (maltenes).
4.2 Refinery Residues
181
However, this does not exactly describe the real conditions. On the one hand the dispersion medium contains aromatic compounds, which are not cracked under the experimental conditions applied here; on the other hand petroleum resins as well as asphaltenes contain parafinic (aliphatic) structures, which can be cracked. Further support for the theory that pyrolysis starts preferentially with the aliphatic C-C-bond, is given by the correlation of the residues after the reaction in 1 bar argon, R, or in 10 bar methane, R,,, respectively, with the atomic ratio H/C of the samples, which present roughly the aromatic portion of the samples, for example: H/C
Hydrocarbon
Class
4.0 3.0 2.2 2.03 2.0 1.33 1.22 1.oo 0.80 0.73
Methane Ethane Decane Hexacontane Cyclohexane Propy lbenzene Ethylbenzene Benzene Naphthalene Anthracene
Alkanes Alkanes Alkanes Alkanes Naphthenes Alkyl aromatics Alkyl aromatics Aromatics Aromatics Aromatics
For the pyrolysis reaction in 1 bar argon in the DSC, a correlation of the residue R, with the ratio C/H may be calculated as follows:
R, = -59.42 H/C
+ 108.68
Y
= 0.7246
The calculation for the residue of the reaction in 10 bar methane results in a similar correlation: R,, = -57.69 H/C
+ 106.19
Y
= 0.7215
Although the coefficients of correlation r are not very high, they clearly indicate the relationship, that with an increasing H/C ratio (i.e. decreasing aromacity), the quantity of coked products decreases.
4.2.9 Conclusions from experiments on refinery residues 4.2.9.1 Thermogravimetry Thermogravimetry on refinery residues gives results which may be repeated (by the same analyst using the same instrument) and reproduced (by another analyst using other instruments) within acceptable tolerances as has been determined by comparative experiments. The decrease of the boiling temperatures by a considerable amount, caused by a sufficient flow rate of the inert gas through the oven, makes a simulated distillation
182
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
feasible, and this continues directly onto the atmospheric distillation according to DIN 51 751 (ASTM D 285-62), as shown by other authors [4-151. The application of this simulated distillation is restricted to substances which do not evaporate in the gas flow at room temperature, because under those conditions, exact determination of the start temperature is impossible. Simulated distillation is best applied to substances such as atmospheric residues and higher boiling blends. Simulated distillation using thermogravimetry competes with simulated distillation by gas chromatography. However, it has the advantage that no damage is done to the thermogravimetric instrument by deposited coke residue from crachng reactions, when the latter may definitely be identified. To determine which products may be obtained by means of distillation processes and in what quantities, it is not necessary to calculate the complete distillation curve. A series of index numbers, which may be taken directly from the thermogram supply useful corresponding values. The index number, AG200, represents the quantity obtainable by atmospheric distillation and the difference, AG300 - AG200, the quantity separable by vacuum distillation. The temperature of 400 "C marks the upper limit of the distillation range and transition to the cracking range in thermogravimetry. Therefore the index number 4G400 marks the maximum quantity of substance which may be obtained by distillative methods (high vacuum distillation). The index numbers R500 or R600 roughly characterize the Conradson coke residue, and the index number R800 represents the final state of the coking process. R800, will be considerably less than the Conradson coke residue with an average of approximately 25 %, as has been described in the literature [4-12, 4-16]. The difference of 100 % minus the sum of the distillable fraction of the sample, AG400, and the coke residue, R800 gives the percentage of the sample which can theoretically, be cracked, CR: CR = 100 - (AG400 + R800) On the other hand, the difference of 100 % minus the sum 4G300 + R800 represents the portion of the sample which may be cracked under working conditions of the cracker in the refinery (in practice) PCR: PCR = 100 - (AG300 + R800) The Conradson coke residue may be characterized quite accurately by the residue at the point of inflexion Gwof the TGA curve. Statistical evaluation shows the temperature at this point of inflexion T, from 500-510 "C. Therefore the index number R500 represents the Conradson coke residue. It is likely that there is a distinction between the distillation residues, G, I25 wt%, and blown products and cracker residues of Gw > 30 %. The absolute values of the peak maxima of the DTG curve, which represent the reaction rate are not very helpful. The peak height and peak width indicate the uniformity of the substance which reacts in this temperature range. Uniform substances show high, narrow peaks, whereas flat, broad peaks represent blends of substances with a wide range of boiling or crack temperatures, The position of the peak maximum temperature of the DTG curve, T-, shows whether the reaction is still a distillative process (Tmx < 400 "C) or a cracking (pyrolysis) reaction (Tmx > 400°C). The latter gives an arithmetical mean X = 457.5 "C independent of the origin of the samples. From the derived index num-
4.2 Refinery Residues
183
bers, the ratio CR/ND, which represents the crackable part of the sample within the nondistillable part, may be used to distinguish between vacuum residues, bitumen, and atmospheric residues when CR/ND r 0.80, and heavy products from conversion processes with CR/ND = 0.63. The lower value for the conversion products indicates that considerable portions of the sample have already been cracked and removed by distillation. Correlation of the Conradson coke residue or R800 with the non-distillable part of the samples does not give significant results, nor does correlation of the reaction rate with the average molecular weight. Considering the temperature limits in use in refinery processes; a value of 100 % simulated atmospheric residue, SAR, is found in most of the samples of investigation. By this definition, the four atmospheric residues have not been fully distilled. The simulated vacuum residue, SVR, shows how far the samples are distilled. Since the SVR = 100 AG300, exhibits higher values than the non-distillable portion of the sample ND = 100 AG400, the values of that part of the sample which is crackable in practice, PCR, exceed the more theoretical values, CR. The ratio PCR/SVR does not give a clear distinction of distillation residues from conversion products than it is possible using the ratio CR/ ND. The relation of the different index numbers characterizing the coke residue to the simulated vacuum residue, SVR, does give useful results. The relation of the Conradson coke residue CCR to SVR results in ratios between 10.0 and 23.4 for vacuum residues and bitumens; to ratios from 12.2 to 14.8 for atmospheric residues; and the ratio for residues from conversion processes gives values of over 27 up to 43. On the other hand the ratio G,/SVR does not distinguish clearly between vacuum and atmospheric residues, but semi-blown products and residues from conversion processes clearly show higher values. The relation of R8O0 to the simulated vacuum residue SVR is similar. Since the values of R800 are lower than the corresponding values of CCR and G,, the ratio R800ISVR generally has lower values than both the other index numbers (CCR/SVR and G,/ SVR). The experiments in air yield less interesting results with regard to the further possibilities of processing residues, than do the experiments in inert atmosphere. There is no difference between the index numbers T1 % and T5 % from the experiments in inert atmosphere and in air, but the weight loss up to 400 'C, AG400, is less in the experiments in air than in inert gas. This indicates the formation of non-volatile oxidation products. In the experiments in air no residues from a colung process have been found. This does not exclude the formation of such residues as intermediates during the course of the reaction. In each case the TGA curve demonstrates the value of zero (or very little ash residue) at temperatures exceeding 550 "C. In contrast to the experiments in inert gas, the DTG curves for the experiments in air exhibit up to ten peaks, of which the first peak, representing a distillative process, is at the same temperature as that in the experiments in inert gas (arithmetical means: in argon X = 304 OC;in air X = 31 1 "C). Obviously the start of the oxidation depends on the chemical nature of the sample. Even if a clear correlation cannot be computed, high temperatures of
184
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
the first oxidation peak Toxhave been found for samples possessing high aromacity, FA: Sample no.
FA
To, ("C)
0.461 0.515 0.402 0.676
443 400 566 588
~~
18 23 24 25
For the other samples, the first oxidation peak maximum was found in a temperature range from 380-390 "C. The reaction rate does not give significant values and will not be discussed here. The existence of a cracking reaction during the oxidation cannot be excluded because corresponding maxima of the DTG curves both in air and in argon were found at equal temperatures. In simulated cracking experiments in the thermobalance, the temperatures of the cracking maximum of the DTG curves, Tc,are shifted to higher values (505-560 "C) due to the very fast heating rate, ,6 = 100 K/min. The group of 13 vacuum residues and bitumens exhibits the highest mean of the peak maximum temperatures, whereas the group of atmospheric residues and the group of conversion products demonstrate a lower temperature, but at the same level. The means of the reaction rate, DTGc, show the same trend. The lower values of the reaction rate DTG for the residues from conversion processes (samples 19-22) and the high values of their crack residue R, show once more that the samples have previously undergone crack reactions. Fui-ther comparisons such as relating the reaction rate to the average molecular weight, do not give significant results. The start temperature of the cracking process TBwas ascertained according to Adony [4-141. A mean X = 414 "C ( fV = 4.2 %) has been found independent of the provenance of the samples. The empirical determination of 400 "C as the end of the evaporation range and the start of the pyrolysis (cracking) range, is thus justfied.
4.2.9.2 Reaction kinetics Investigation of the reaction kinetics in an inert atmosphere using DSC confirms the difference between evaporation and cracking processes. However, the extrapolated onset temperatures of the evaporation exceed the T5 % index numbers of thermogravimetry considerably. On the contrary the start temperatures (onset) of the cracking reaction in DSC were found at nearly equal temperatures, to those from thermogravimetry, TB:
x ("C)
4.2 Refinery Residues
185
Neither the pressure nor the chemical nature of the inert gas influences the onset temperatures noticeably. The activation energy determined for the evaporation process is of the same magnitude as the enthalpy of vaporization, Hv, and depends closely upon the pressure. At atmospheric pressure and an equal heating rate, the temperature of the evaporation maximum of the DSC curve is found at the same temperature as the corresponding maximum in the DTG curve. The same behavior has been found for the temperatures of the DSC crack maximum and the corresponding maximum in the DTG curve (both at equal heating rates). While the enthalpy of vaporization depends on the nature and the boiling temperature of the component evaporating, nearly equal values of the activation energy and the frequency factor of the pyrolysis reaction have been found, independent of the provenance of the samples. When the activation energy is calculated according to equation 3-12, both the lineal and square values of the absolute peak temperature are used. Therefore the individual values of the kinetic coefficients for each sample show considerable scattering. Consequently, arithmetical means with relative large coefficients of variation will be given by statistical evaluation, but if statistical evaluation of the peak maximum temperatures for each heating rate is carried out first, and the resulting means are applied to the calculation of the kinetic coefficients, then average values with coefficients of vaiation fV = 1.2 % (maximum) are found. The plot of log heating rate oversus the inverse Kelvin temperature 1 000/T shows that the average values fit a straight line and do not require any regression calculation; whereas the temperatures from the individual measurements do not fit the straight line so perfectly. The average values of the activation energy and the frequency factor computed from the means of the corresponding peak maximum temperatures are considered to be reliable. Comparison of the means of the two methods of calculation shows no difference between the average values and the arithmetical means. Increasing pressure up to 10 bar gives values of the kinetic parameters approximately 20 % higher than those of the reaction at 1 bar pressure. The pyrolysis reaction produces an increase in volume, due to the formation of crack gases and easily volatile fragments from the original long-chain liquid or solid components. This behavior is in accordance with Le Chatelier’s principle. Pyrolysis is a first order reaction so the temperature function of the reaction rate constant k and the half life time t1,2may be computed easily using the coefficients of the Arrhenius’ equation: activation energy E and frequency factor A which had already been determined (see chapter 3.3.1, equations 3-7 and 3-8). Such data are the basis for the parameters of thermal conversion processes, such as temperature of the plant installations, housing time etc. It should be stated here that there is a question over the method for the calculation of the values for the activation energy E and the frequency factor A according to ASTM E 698-79, based on investigations by Kissinger [3-15, 3-16]. Kissinger makes the supposition that the temperatures of the maximum of the reaction rate coincide with the temperatures of the maximum of the caloric effect, when both are at the same degree of conversion, and independent of the heating rate. This assumption does not generally prove true. This may also explain the variable differences between the maximum temperatures of the DTG and the DTA curves at equal heating rates, and may even be the source of diverging values
186
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
of the Arrhenius kinetic coefficients, if the calculation has been carried out using DSC and DTG peak maximum temperatures of experiments with different heating rates. Nevertheless control experiments at different heating rates on the substances of this investigation, using a Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer, showed that differences in the maximum temperatures of the corresponding DTG and DTA curves fell within the tolerance limits of the method, for most of the samples. Moreover the maxima were found at equal conversions independent of the heating rates applied. We should not overlook the fact that the data acquired from the experiments are themselves averages of a series of parallel and/or consecutive reactions of multicomponent systems. The experiments on model substances give values of the activation energies and frequency factors comparable to data acquired by other methods. The data presented here are certainly not absolute data but solid values adequate for comparative purposes. The value of the pyrolysis enthalpy found by using integration of the peak areas should be independent of the heating rates, but is not so in practice. An increase in the enthalpy values was observed with increasing heating rates. Because of the difficulties experienced in finding the correct integration limits, the data presented here should be regarded only as approximate values. Nevertheless they exhibit orders of magnitude comparable to published data [4-17 to 4-19], which also show very varied values. The pyrolysis enthalpy must be known exactly, so that the supply of process energy can be calculated and this should be considered when the plant is set up. The considerable differences between the pyrolysis enthalpies determined in this investigation, do not only originate in the different bonding enthalpies of different kinds of chemical bonds which had to be cracked. The values also include the enthalpies of vaporization of the different crack products formed during the reaction, which may be of considerable magnitude.
4.2.9.3 Correlation of data from thermoanalysis with analytical data An attempt to correlate thermal behavior of a multicomponent system such as refinery residues with analytical data, did not give satisfactory results in most cases. The analytical data are mean values of a multicomponent system, whereas thermal behavior is strongly influenced by individual compounds or groups of similar compounds. The group of distillation residues, and products from conversion processes which already have a considerable themial history, which was selected, comprises a too wide range of products. Thus only a few thermoanalytical data can be correlated with data from the structural group analysis. The hypothetical “average molecule” of the strucutral group analysis does not exist and cannot govern the thermal behavior. Data describing the average size of the molecule, such as the average relative particle mass and the carbon number ZC, may be correlated satisfactorily with data from thermoanalysis, which describes the evaporation behavior, such as the start temperatures of evaporation, T1 % and T5 %, and the distillable fraction of the sample, AG400. Surprisingly and without logical explanation, the residue 11800 can also be correlated.
a
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
187
Data from colloid analysis show that the concentration of the dispersion medium may be related to the distillable fraction AG400, whereas the concentration of asphaltenes, or the total of asphaltenes and petroleum resins, determines the quantity of coke residue after pyrolysis. That portion of the sample which can be cracked, CR, will usually be determined from the concentration of petroleum resins. The aliphatic side chains of the alkylaromatic system of the asphaltenes have a small influence. The coke residue can be related to the data from structural group analysis which describe the aromatic character of the samples. Thermogravimetry in air only shows the correlation of data describing the molecule size with those index numbers which are relevant to the evaporation behavior. The reaction kinetic constants: activation energy E and frequency factor A , can only be correlated with the concentration of paraffinic carbon, CP (from structural group analysis); with the concentration of dispersion medium (from colloid analysis); and with the H/C ratio (from elemental analysis). These functions show correlation coefficients of an acceptable magnitude. Examination of the correlation of the concentration of maltenes revealed a similar tendency but with very low coefficients of correlation. It is well known that the dispersion medium contains the highest concentration of chemical bonds, which can be cracked under the chosen reaction conditions [4-201. In the pyrolysis experiments from distillation residues, about 92 % of the dispersion medium was converted, whereas conversion of the petroleum resins was only 83 %, despite the fact that the kinetic coefficients are of nearly the same magnitude for the two components.
4.3 Investigations on bitumen Bitumens are residues of the vacuum distillation of suitable crude oils (distillation bitumen). Residues of less suitable crudes must be partially oxidized by blowing to achieve the desired technical properties (semi-blown bitumen). Blown bitumens for special purposes can also be produced from vacuum residues. The process is executed by blowing a stream of finely distributed air through the molten bitumen (sometimes reduced in viscosity by addition of flux oil) at temperatures of 250-290 "C. The bitumens are usually characterized by needle penetration (DIN 52 010, ASTM D 5-73). The measured value corresponds to the penetration of a needle loaded with a defined weight at 25 "C within 5 seconds. The depth is calibrated in tenths of a millimeter (0.1 mm). The commercial range comprises bitumens of the grades from B200, B80, B65, B45, B25 down to B10. Blown bitumens are characterized by two values: the softening point ring & ball test (S.P. R&B) and the needle penetration described above. According to DIN 52 01 1 (ASTM D 2398-68T) the softening point R&B is defined as the temperature when a ball passes through a bitumen-filled ring in a heating bath. The designated values consist of a combination of softening pointlpenetration, such as 85/25,85140,100125, and 100/15 for the most commonly used blown bitumens [4-211.
188
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
These data are subject to relative wide tolerance ranges; therefore, individual testing of the penetration and the softening point R&B is advisable if eventual correlation with other values is attempted. Bitumens are colloid systems, as are crude oils, and consist of the two colloidal components, petroleum resins and asphaltenes, dispersed in a dispersion medium. To investigate the composition of the system, a colloid precipitation according to Neumann [4-101 is carried out. The chemical nature of the bitumen and its components were determined by element analysis, where the atomic ratio H/C includes an indicator of the aromacity. Further characterization is performed by measuring the average relative particle mass (mean of the molecular weight M> by vapor pressure osmometry. The consistency data (penetration and softening point), the analytical data, and the data from thermoanalysis have been investigated to discover whether there is any correlation between them. The aim is to find some simple means of characterization of the different bitumen types using thermogravimetry. Furthermore, the possibility of replacing the rotating flask aging test according to DIN 52 017 (ASTM D 2872-85), with isothermal thermogravimetry was investigated. DSC experiments in inert gas and in air on bitumen and its separated colloid components should reveal the quality and quantity of the influence of such compounds on the thermal and oxidation stability of the colloid system. The experiments were carried out on sixteen distillation bitumens of different consistency and different origin as well as on five blown bitumens [4-201. Bitumen may only be used technically within relative narrow temperature ranges, which are largely determined by consistency data, such as the softening point R&B and the brealung point according to FraaU (DIN 52 012, IP 80 153). This range, also called the span of plasticity, is bounded towards lower temperatures by increasing brittlenes and towards higher temperatures by plastic deformation under load. Addition of polymers to bitumen may extend the span of plasticity [4-221. The influence of polymers upon the aging properties and upon the low temperature behavior may be clarified using thermoanalytical measurements.
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
189
4.3.1 Description and characterization of the samples The type and origin of the samples is shown in table 4-46: Table 4-46: Type and origin of the samples Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Symbol
Type
Origin
Z
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80
Venezuela Forties + Arabian Light Venezuela Venezuela Venezuela Venezuela Venezuela Venezuela Venezuela Iranian Light + Souedi + Khafji Arabian Heavy
Y
+ + 0 0 0 0 Y
14
+
15 16 I
X
I1 111
IV V
Y
*
* *
* *
Vacuum residue (abt. B 200) Vacuum residue (abt. B 130) Vacuum residue (abt. B 80) Vacuum residue (abt. B 65) B 200 B 10 Blown sample no. 11 (Laboratory product abt. 85/25) Bitumen 100/25 Bitumen 85/40 Bitumen 85/25 Bitumen 100/25
Kuwait Khafj
+ Russia
Kirkuk Venezuela unknown West German refinery West German refinery West German refinery South German refinery
Use of the same symbols in the plots shows distillation bitumens taken from the same refinery. Only the samples marked by a square symbol were taken at the same time. Each of the blown bitumens is marked with an asterisk. Table 4-47 shows the consistency data: needle penetration (DIN 52 010, ASTM D 5-73) and softening point ring & ball (DIN 52 011, ASTM D 2398-68)
190
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-47: Consistency data of the samples (arithmetic means) Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I
39.0 39.5 43.1 52.5 47.3 55.0 57.9 61.3 70.5 46.5 40.0 50.1 52.8 53.3 42.9 90.5 86.5 117.8 100.5 91.3 110.0
I1 III
rv V
159.0 186.0 156.2 72.7 161.5 75.4 49.3 32.2 21.9 75.0 196.0 127.0 75.8 50.3 209.0 10.2 18.0 22.8 32.3 21.7 20.9
The colloidal composition of each sample was analysed using the colloid precipitation according to Neumann [4-101 (Table 4-48): Table 4-48: Colloid composition of the samples (wt %). Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Type
Dispersion Medium
Petroleum Resins
Asphaltenes
Resins Asphaltenes
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 VR (B 200) VR (B 130) VR (B 80)
78.09 76.95 73.38 63.35 65.58 59.60 66.22 64.81 63.31 75.60 71.60 71.76 61.61
2.91 8.51 9.84 23.70 19.88 21.83 15.10 15.09 13.59 2.88 7.40 10.50 19.86
19.00 14.54 16.78 15.30 14.54 18.57 18.68 20.10 23.10 21.52 21.00 17.65 18.45
0.153 0.585 0.586 1.549 1.367 1.176 0.808 0.75 1 0.588 0.134 0.352 0.594 1.076
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
Sample No.
14 15 16 I I1 I11 IV V
Type
Dispersion Medium
Petroleum Resins
Asphaltenes Astaltenes
Resins
VR (B 65) B 200 B 10
66.89 76.67 70.95 56.10 66.29 67.23 59.97 53.62
14.99 7.92 6.18 8.71 3.51 2.44 6.54 11.96
18.21 15.41 22.87 35.14 30.20 30.33 33.49 34.41
0.823 0.514 0.270 0.248 0.116 0.080 0.195 0.348
-
100125 85/40 85/25 100125
191
The elemental composition and the average relative particle mass of the bitumens and their separated colloid components were determined (Tables 4-49 - 4-52)
Table 4-49: Element analysis (wt %) and average relative particle mass of the bitumen. Sample No.
Bitumen
C
H
N
S
H C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I
I1 111 IV V
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 VR (€3 200) VR (B 130) VR (B 80) VR (B 65) B 200 B 10 -
100125 85/40 85/25 100125
-
M
84.24 85.61 84.46 84.76 85.50 85.13 84.44 85.00 85.05 82.15 84.13
10.45 10.21 10.34 10.31 10.22 10.28 10.66 10.08 10.10 10.19 10.14
0.66 0.39 0.50 0.61 0.56 0.60 0.47 0.65 0.60 0.50 0.42
3.17 3.95 3.18 3.16 3.15 3.21 3.01 3.20 3.20 5.54 5.18
1.489 1.431 1.469 1.460 1.434 1.449 1.515 1.475 1.425 1.488 1.446
733 929 727 805 788 865 973 1064 1123 753 839
83.92
9.84
0.33
5.02
1.407
1045
83.28
10.28
0.62
4.92
1.481
984
83.77
9.75
0.37
5.68
1.397
95 1
85.04 83.47 84.85 86.13 86.20 85.70 84.59
10.11 9.71 10.04 10.18 10.27 10.10 10.37
0.58 0.47 0.31 0.44 0.39 0.38 0.42
3.53 4.92 5.01 2.72 2.70 2.95 3.73
1.427 1.396 1.420 1.419 1.430 1.414 1.471
674 1149 1117 68 1 738 784 948
192
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-50: Element analysis (wt %) and average relative particle mass of the dispersion medium Sample No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I I1 111 IV V
Bitumen
C
H
N
S
H C
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 VR (B 200) VR (B 130) VR (B 80) VR (B 65) B 200 B 10
84.00 83.63 84.80 84.10 85.10 85.13 85.62 85.56 84.36 82.66 84.19
11.01 10.43 10.93 10.68 10.87 10.73 11.05 10.84 10.61 10.70 10.77
0.46 0.28 0.38 0.45 0.45 0.43 0.42 0.40 0.37 0.41 0.28
2.88 4.68 2.77 2.84 2.86 2.79 2.87 2.87 2.76 4.65 4.54
1.573 1.497 1.547 1.524 1.553 1.513 1.549 1.520 1SO9 1.553 1.535
83.69
10.39
0.32
4.61
1.490
792
83.21
10.78
0.38
4.02
1.555
823
83.21
10.31
0.45
4.99
1.485
738
84.89 83.49 84.06 83.86 84.39 85.27 84.62
10.77 10.77 11.15 11.20 11.30 11.21 11.43
0.34 0.27 0.17 0.62 0.54 0.41 0.55
3.07 3.97 4.15 2.3 1 2.31 2.45 2.67
1.522 1.540 1.592 1.603 1.607 1.578 1.621
465 727 669 569 439 573 589
-
100/25 85/40 85/25 100/25
~
M
568 705 540 576 842 966 1001 87 1
932 63 1 776
Table 4-51: Element analyis (wt %) and average relative particle mass of the petroleum resins. Sample No.
Bitumen
C
H
N
S
H
~
-
M
C ~
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 VR (B 200) VR (B 130)
82.12 82.78 84.68 82.66 84.46 84.41 84.44 84.91 84.29 81.92 83.92
10.64 10.92 10.46 10.53 10.58 10.60 10.66 10.77 10.45 10.90 11.05
0.55 0.32 0.57 0.62 0.42 0.42 0.47 0.44 0.45 0.54 0.20
2.69 4.78 3.01 2.87 2.93 2.74 3.01 2.82 3.15 4.48 4.63
1.564 1.583 1.482 1.529 1.503 1SO7 1.515 1.522 1.488 1.597 1.580
935 1000 968 984 1116 1171 1293 1310 1399 860 920
82.46
10.14
0.49
4.91
1.476
1I96
193
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
-
Sample No.
Bitumen
C
H
N
S
-
13
VR (B 80) VR (B 65) B 200 B 10
84.35
10.49
0.44
4.16
1.492
983
83.38
10.26
0.29
5.29
1.477
1028
83.99 85.25 83.30 83.80 83.61 84.62 84.98
10.05 9.97 11.10 11.43 10.62 11.10 11.40
0.74 0.24 0.20 0.21 0.28 0.22 0.26
3.54 4.40 3.56 3.17 2.45 2.64 2.11
1.436 1.403 1.589 1.637 1.524 1.574 1.610
1130 1403 989 577 818 801 887
14 15 16 I I1 I11 IV V
-
100/25 85/40 85/25 100/25
Table 4-52: Element analysis (wt %) and average relative particle mass Sample No.
Bitumen
C
H
N
S
H C
of the asphaltenes
H C
___
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 I 11 111 IV V
M
-
M
~
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 VR (B 200) VR (B 130) VR (B 80) VR (B 65) B 200 B 10 -
100/25 85/40 85/25 100/25
84.37 81.94 84.65 84.69 83.62 84.03 84.18 85.34 83.53 81.53 83.00
8.09 7.68 8.08 7.96 7.76 7.97 8.02 8.01 8.27 8.06 7.60
1.44 0.91 1S O 1.61 1.24 1.35 1.42 1.47 1.42 1.10 0.85
4.21 7.03 4.06 4.23 4.45 4.49 4.33 4.42 4.03 7.80 7.40
1.151 1.125 1.145 1.128 1.136 1.138 1.143 1.126 1.160 1.196 1.099
3680 4480 5380 8156 6139 7328 7870 7797 5567 2489 5938
82.54
8.08
1.08
7.23
1.175
6092
81.52
7.86
1.04
6.91
1.157
2767
81.06
7.86
0.76
9.07
1.164
4700
84.48 82.41 82.91 85.21 85.82 82.95 83.17
7.92 8.40 7.53 8.42 7.86 8.11 7.82
1.11 0.74 0.47 0.78 0.86 1.22 0.78
4.94 5.84 6.43 3.75 3.60 3.69 5.66
1.125 1.223 1.090 1.186 1.099 1.173 1.128
4213 6400 5897 4075 6420 5126 8373
194
4 Therrnoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleurn Products
The atomic ratio H:C demonstrates relatively weak aromacity for bitumens, dispersion medium and petroleum resins, whereas the asphaltenes possess a considerably higher aromacity. Despite differences in the colloid composition, differences of the H C ratios of the individual bitumens are very small, as shown by the small coefficients of variation + V in Table 4-53: Table 4-53 Means X and coefficients of variation ?z V (%) of the H:C ratio of the distillation bitumens
Bitumen Dispersion medium Petroleum resins Asphaltenes
1.447 1.532 1.514 1.146
16 16 16 16
3.11 1.92 3.58 2.85
There is no statistical significant difference between the means of the dispersion medium and the petroleum resins. The other means do exhibit differences (99.9 % statistical significance). It is notable that the dispersion medium, as well as the petroleum resins of the blown bitumen are more aliphatic in character than those components of the distillation bitumens. This may be caused by the composition of the flux oils which were added. The asphaltenes of both types of bitumen display similar aromacity (Table 4-54): Table 4-54 Means mens
X and coefficients
of variation f V (%) of the H:C ratio of the blown bitu-
Bitumen Dispersion medium Petroleum resins Asphaltenes
X
n
+V (%)
1.431 1.600 1.587 1.135
5 5 5 5
1.62 1.01 2.67 3.79
There is also no difference only between the means of the dispersion medium and the petroleum resins. Comparison of the means from the distillation and the blown bitumens reveals a difference between the petroleum resins of each type of petroleum, whereas the means of the bitumens and the asphaltenes are the same. The colloid composition of the blown bitumens shows higher asphaltene content and lower dispersion medium content than that of the distillation bitumens. As expected the penetration decreases with increasing concentration of asphaltenes, whereas the softening point increases. A plot of the consistency data versus the concentration of dispersion medium or maltenes naturally demonstrates the inverse tendency. The relation of the consistency data to the average relative particle mass M of the bitumens also reveals an increasing softening point with increasing M, whereas the penetration decreases.
4 . j Investigations on bitumen
lY3
A fairly close correlation of the consistency data with the colloid composition or the particle mass, is only possible for bitumens from the same refinery and from crude oils of nearly the same origin.
4.3.2 Thermoanalytical investigations The following thermoanalytical investigations were performed: Thermogravimetry in inert gas Therniogravimetry in air Pyrolysis (DSC) in inert gas Oxidation test (DSC) in air The thermogravimetric tests were carried out in a thermobalance TG 750 (StantonRedcroft). The pyrolysis and the tests of oxidation stability were performed with a DuPont 990 Thermoanalyzer equipped with a 910 DSC and a pressure DSC cell.
4.3.2.1 Thermogravimetry in inert gas All the bitumens were heated in a flow of inert gas (argon, flow rate 25 cm3/min) from room temperature up to 900 'C, always applying the same heating rate = 10 K/min. A plot of the TGA curve versus the temperature of the distillation bitumen B80 (sample 6) and its colloidal components is shown in Fig. 4-37. The curves of the bitumen, the dispersion medium, and the petroleum resins differ very little from each other up to 450 "C. The differences shown by the curves in the temperature range above 500 "C represent the coke residue. The curve of the asphaltenes is shifted towards higher temperatures due to a higher particle mass and also has a considerably higher coke residue. The index numbers for thermogravimetry in inert gas, for the bitumens and their colloidal components are given in Tables 4-55 to 4-58. The only derived index number is the crackable part of the sample, CR, which is listed in Table 4-59. Evaporation of the distillation bitumens and their colloidal components first starts at temperatures 2 200 "C (T1 %) or 2 259 "C (2'5 %). Since thin-layer evaporation takes place in the thermobalance, and the evaporated parts of the sample are immediately removed by the gas flow, these temperatures are lower than the real start temperatures of an equilibrium evaporation (for example: distillation according to Engler; DIN 5 1 75 1 or ASTM D 285-62). The corresponding start temperatures for an equilibrium evaporation should be more than 400 "C. The evaporation start temperatures for bitumen, dispersion medium, and petroleum resins are lower in the case of blown bitumens, influenced by the flux oils which are added in order to facilitate the blowing process. Some of the index numbers of the thermogravimetry may be correlated with consistency data, and with analysis data (see chapters 4.3.2.1.1 and 4.3.2.1.2). Other values show only a small
196
0
4 Thermonnalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
200
4 00
600
8 00
Fig. 4-37 Thermogravimetry (TG 750) of Bitumen and its Colloidal Components Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Bitumen B80 Sample 6 Curve 2: Dispersion Medium Curve 3: Petroleum Resins Curve 4: Asvhaltenes
1.9
223
188
100125
V
2.0
23I
181
85/25
IV
24.3
51.1 40.8
19.3 16.7
7.8
18.7 20.5
19.3 19.9 16.5
13.8
17.3 23.0 23.9 20.0
16.4
20.6
16.2
15.0 16.7 9.1 14.5 17.0 16.0 16.0 18.9 17.7 19.3 16.9
800 "C
18.5
R
24.2
20.0
23.5 24.0 20.0 17.4 22.2 19.5 19.1 20.8 21.7 26.3 20.7
600 "C
15.8 58.9
22.7 31.8 58.6
50.0
28.1
28.0
34.5
47.1 45.9 47.3 39.8 35.0 16.5 13.6 15.7 20.0 38.5 44.8
400 "C
21.4 29.0
4.5 4.0 27.7
-
0.1 2.3
20.8
2.1
1.8
0.2
2.0
-
15.7 4.8 15.2 7.9 4.1 2.1 1.6 1.2 1.2 6.9 7.9
300 "C
3.2
AG
-
-
0.3
-
-
0.4
-
-
0.9
200 "C
3.3
306 3 10 223
247 257 174
100 "C
217
85/40
I11
229
333
329
184
262
279
315
247 302 248 278 307 331 341 356 350 287 284
205 258 206 220 25 1 277 285 290 290 287 239
264
T5 %
T1%
169
100/25
-
16 I I1
15
14
13
B 10
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 VR (B 200) VR (B 130) VR (B 80) VR (B 65) B 200
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12
Type of bitumen
Sample No.
Table 4-55: Thermogravimetry of bitumen in argon. -
2.43 7.83 7.97 7.35 2.66 3.56 2.77 1.93 2.34 3.78 1.70 4.51
9.90
8.80
9.91
4.96 7.00 6.68 8.69 8.07 10.44 10.82 11.82 10.48 6.18 6.49
DTG
305 419 433 435 295 428 29 1 440 325 434 333 416
428
432
428
Tmax 422 407 426 423 427 436 435 439 437 43 1 418
9
8B
0
0,
8
5-
2
20.0
1.9
237
178
100/25
V
33.2
3.2
213
109
85/25
IV
35.0
4.4
202
163
-
85/40
25.0 6.3 5.0 31.3
3.4 0.2 0.4 2.8
215 290 300 218
153 229 232 170
I11
3.2
1.o
327
200
100/25
3.0
0.2
319
248
15 16 I I1
14
13
4.0
0.9
3 10
214
12
1.1 1.3
-
0.9
-
15.3 5.0 18.0 13.0 6.3 4.1 3.0 2.5 2.3 9.1 12.3
1.1 0.9 2.9 1.6 0.8 0.5
248 300 227 25 1 288 310 319 336 328 274 257
194 204 194 178 213 227 258 216 267 190 187
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 VR (B 200) VR (B 130) VR (B 80) VR (B 65) B 200 B 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
AG
300 "C
100 "C
200 "C
T5 %
T1 %
Type of bitumen
Sample No.
Table 4-56: Thermogravimetry of dispersion medium in argon
11.9 10.2
52.8
7.3 67.4
80.0
5.7 9.2 6.1 8.0
65.8 39.5 40.0 70.0
7.9
30.0
10.1
10.9
35.2
17.3
10.2 7.5 11.8 15.4 18.7 10.2 12.4 9.0 7.4 7.3 8.3
600 "C
52.3 36.5 57.0 51.5 38.5 31.5 30.0 22.3 24.8 46.0 50.0
400 "C
R
6.0
1.o
3.4
4.3 6.9 5.1 4.0
9.8
5.8
6.9
7.3 6.2 6.7 6.3 6.3 6.8 10.6 6.4 6.4 6.3 4.0
800 "C
427 435 426 309 420 290 404 310 446 450
6.53 9.98 8.00 3.93 2.76 4.27 2.31 4.47 1.93 4.19
440
1 1.94
437
428 10.41
11.61
426 434 419 426 436 438 43 1 44 1 444 433 427
Tmax
7.50 10.18 6.26 5.92 10.26 11.57 11.48 13.89 13.27 7.94 7.71
DTG
9.4 7.9
14.1 11.4 13.2
46.5 51.6 27.5
18.0 23.4 11.0
1.4 2.3 2.4
239 222 245
191
177
157
85/40
85/25
100125
I11
IV
V
-
100125
14
10.9
17.0 20.0 8.4 2.6 19.9 21.2 16.8 6.2
13.2 18.1 34.0 73.7
9.9 3.8 5.0 37.0
2.1 1.o 1.0 2.8
245 320 300 215
170 208 192 175
9.50 10.68 8.93 4.47 2.60 2.44 4.26 2.15 5.28 6.74
448 448 436 290 421 317 455 290-320 436 491
447 12.08 15.1
15 16 I I1
16.8
17.1
3.0
1.2
341
444 11.18 12.1
171
13.7
25.9
4.4
12.64 16.4
1.0
13
12 309
447
9.42 9.73 9.59 9.50 10.42 10.17 13.27 15.12 12.38 9.13 11.21 17.7 21.0 18.0 12.3 13.0 11.9 15.2 13.1 16.5 18.2 14.5
200
18.3
14.9
447 44 1 443 447 443 447 448 454 447 455 447
DTG
800 "C
4.0
18.6 28.1 20.3 14.5 14.6 17.0 17.1 14.0 17.8 21.8 15.6
30.0 17.8 27.5 31.0 27.8 15.8 14.0 10.0 17.9 20.2 25.0
14.1 3.0 9.4 8.2 6.0 4.0 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.6 5.5
4.0 0.6 2.3 1.o 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.1 0.5 1.2
R
1.5
600 "C
400 "C
AG
300 "C
200 "C
323
100 "c
177
T5 9% 210 304 248 27 1 288 310 350 370 34 1 337 29 I
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 VR (B200) VR (B130) VR (B 80) VR (B 65) B 200 B 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
T1 %
146 223 145 200 193 212 226 23 1 257 236 187
Type of bitumen
Sample No.
Table 4-57: Thermogravimetry of petroleum resins in argon
5,
r W W
3
2
8
2
E.
oc
2 3
15 16 I I1 I11 IV V
14
13
100/25 85/40 85/25 100/25
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 VR (B200) VR (B130) VR (B 80) VR (B 65) B 200 B 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12
Type of bitumen
Sample No.
-
217 202 298 212 213 216 204
256
279
284
278
213 229 234 3 14 248 349 23 1 313 235
T1 %
362 340 372 323 3 10 33 1 415
381
390
389
344 380 387 397 378 400 390 397 342 323 378
T.5 % 100°C
Table 4-58: Theimogravimetry of aphaltenes in argon
1
7 .O 6.5
1.2 1.6 2.5 3.0 1.1 4.0 2.7 3.9 1.7
0.4 0.6
0.8
9.3 14.8 9.9 9.6 11.1 10.4 4.0
7.0
0.8 2.6 0.2
-
0.3
1.2
9.O 7.0 6.9 5.6 7.3 5.0 5.2 5.7 10.0 8.9 7.5
400 "C
0.2
300 "C 2.9 1.9 1.9 0.9 2.0 0.3 2.0 0.9 4.0 4.6 1.2
AG 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.2 0.3 -
200°C
's 2a
447 448 448 447 438 447
7.03 7.00 6.42 6.23 5.94 6.65 3.24 3.13 3.28 5.01
46.9 48.8 49.8 40.8 45.2 38.0 51.0 36.0 46.2
51.0 52.1 42.8 47.2 55.2 58.2 51.5 49.9
49.1
449 448 508
x
a
"n
R
s
$
2
E. 2 8
07
g
$
~
k
g g
23
47.7 49.9
450 447 453 453 447 456 449
448 447 452
4.39 6.73 5.66 6.04 5.00 6.12 5.87 5.01 5.06 4.99 6.12
Q
43.8 49.5 50.6 51.3 51.5 51.0 51.5 53.5 48.0 45.0 49.0
Tmax
54.7 51.2 52.9 54.4 56.9 54.2 54.3 56.0 50.8 56.0 51.3
DTG
800 "C
600 "C
R
0
bJ 0
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
201
Table 4-59 Crackable Parts of the Sample, CR (wt %) Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I
I1 I11 IV V
Bitumen
Dispersion Medium
Petroleum Resins
Asphaltenes
37.7 37.4 43.6 45.7 48.0 67.5 70.4 65.4 62.3 42.2 38.8 49.3 53.5 55.5 36.2 58.0 48.3 24.9 25.2 30.2 51.4
40.4 57.7 36.3 42.2 55.2 61.7 59.4 71.3 68.8 47.7 46.0 57.9 64.2 72.9 29.9 53.6 54.9 26.0 16.6 31.6 41.2
52.3 61.2 54.5 56.7 59.2 72.3 70.8 76.9 65.6 60.0 60.5 68.7 62.0 67.8 69.0 61.9 57.6 23.5 44.1 40.5 61.6
47.2 43.5 42.5 43.1 41.2 44.0 42.3 40.8 42.0 46.1 43.5 45.3 46.1 44.7 40.4 44.4 44.9 52.4 37.9 53.6 49.8
unsystematic scattering and can be evaluated by statistical methods. No correlation can be found for example for the maximum temperature Tm of the DTG. In this case arithmetical means within relatively small limits may be calculated (Table 4-60).
Table 4-60: Peak maximum temperatures T,, mens.
Bitumen Dispersion medium Petroleum resins Asphaltenes
("C) of the DTG curve from distillation bitu-
x ("C)
n
f V (%)
428.3 429.3 447.1 448.6
16 16 16 16
1.91 2.49 0.80 0.88
The temperature range of the peak maximum indicates that crack processes occur. Comparison of the means by t-test gives the following results:
202
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-61: Comparison of the means of T,, from distillation bitumens (Difference with. . . % statistical significance)
Bitumen Dispersion Medium Petroleum Resins
Dispersion Medium
Petroleum Resins
Asphaltenes
none
99.9 99.9
99.9 99.9 none
-
none
-
The blown bitumens sometimes have two peak maxima in the DTG curve, whereas the first maximum is absent in all cases involving asphaltenes. Bitumens, dispersion medium, and petroleum resins show the first maximum in the distillation range around 300 "C. The second maximum appears in the crack (pyrolysis) range. The coefficients of variation are larger (Table 4-62) because the number of samples is small. Table 4-62: Peak maximum temperatures T,, mens.
Bitumen Dispersion medium Petroleum resins Asphaltenes
in the crack range of the DTG curves for blown bitu-
x ("C)
n
+V(%)
430.6 429.2 447.8 465.4
5 5 5 5
2.14 4.43 6.03 5.70
The small number of samples invalidates comparison of the means by t-test. The differences from the corresponding temperatures of the distillation bitumens (Table 4-60) are within experimental limits, except for the values of the asphaltenes. The higher temperature of the peak maximum for the asphaltenes of the blown bitumen indicates that very large molecules or aggregates are formed by the condensation reaction as a consequence of the blowing process. The temperatures of the DTG peak maxima above 400 "C represent thermal cracking processes (pyrolysis). The small coefficients of variation of the individual colloidal components indicate that thermal cleavage of identical or similar chemical bonds has taken place. The resistance of the bitumens to pyrolysis is governed by the properties of the dispersion medium, and this is shown by the uniformity T,, values for bitumen and dispersion medium.
4.3.2.1.1 Correlation of index number from thermogravimetry with consistency data The beginning of evaporation is shifted towards higher temperatures with increasing values of penetration. Fig. 4-38: T1 % = f(Pen) and Fig. 4-39: T5 % = f(Pen) demonstrate
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
50
0
to. 1
Penetration
250
200
150
100
203
mml
Fig. 4-38 Thennogravimetry of Bitumens Vaporization Start Temperature TI % versus Needle Pene&ation 400
1
0
+
0 Y
0
Y
Y
Y
+
+z Y
0
50
I00
150
Penetration I O . i mml Fig. 4-39 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Vaporization Start Temperature T.5 % versus Needle Penetration
200
250
204
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
that the data of the distillation bitumens can be fitted to two straight lines whereas the values of the blown bitumens are grouped together well away from the lines. The laboratory blown product (sample I) does conform to the line. The distillable portion of the samples at normal pressure, AG400, increases due to the increase of the penetration (Fig. 4-40) AG400 = f(Pen). The data of the samples from one refinery fit a straight line very well whereas the data from the other refinery form a curve passing through a minimum. The values of the blown bitumen once again form a separate group. No clear correlation of the residues R600 or R800 with the penetration could be found. The peak maximum temperatures of the DTG, representing the rate of the cracking reaction, decrease with increasing penetration (Fig. 4-41) DTG = f(Pen). These data for the samples of distillation bitumens fit a straight line fairy well but the values from the blown bitumens lie separately. The value of the distillation bitumen €310 (sample 16) lies on the line of the blown bitumens indicating that the product must be semiblown. The index numbers T1 % and T5 % of the distillation bitumen can be correlated with the softening point (Fig. 4-42; T5 % = f(S.P. R&B). The curves of T1 % and T5 % versus S.P. R&B have very steep slopes for the distillation bitumens. The values for the blown bitumens are scattered, away from these curves. The values for the laboratory blown product (sample I) and for the bitumen €310 (sample 16) lie between the curves of the
70 60
50
A
40
69 I
c, 3 v
30
0 0
d 20
a
0 10
0
0
50
I00
150
Penetration (0.1 mm) Fig. 4-40 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Distillable Part AG400 versus Needle Penetration
200
250
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
140
, -
i 20
-
,0100
-
4
1
x
-
80
S
.I-
E
2
=O
v
40
n 20 0
205
=-0 0
+\
-
: \
Y
+ Y
; \*
.
-
y
.
I
.
z
1
’
”
’
I
’
.
’
.
l
’
.
’
.
-
.
Fig. 4-41 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Reaction Rate DTG versus Needle Penetration
* x
*
* u
20
40
60
00
SP R&B
100
120
(“C)
Fig. 4-42 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Vaporization Start Temperature T5 % versus Softening Point Ring & Ball
140
206
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
distillation and the blown bitumens, giving further indication that they may be semiblown. In the plot of weight loss up to 400 OC, AG400, versus the softening point (Fig. 4-43), the line for the distillation bitumens also has a steep slope. The values of the laboratory blown product (sample I) and of the bitumen B10 (sample 16) once more lie between the line of the distillation bitumens and the widely scattered blown bitumens. The residues R600 and R800 do not correlate with the softening point nor with the penetration, and therefore no figure is provided. The maxima of the weight loss rate also rises rapidly against the softening point DTG = f(SP R&B). The values of the samples 16 and I are again situated between the distillation and the blown bitumens (Fig. 4-44). The residue which may still be cracked, CR = 100 - (AG400 + RSOO), amounts to 25-70 wt% for the bitumens, 26-73 wt% for the dispersion medium, 24-62 wt% for the petroleum resins, and 38-54 wt% for the asphaltenes. A correlation of the CR with the consistency data may be seen for the bitumens and the dispersion medium; the CR decreases with increasing penetration and rises with increasing softening point (Fig. 4-45 to Fig. 4-48). The petroleum resins only show a correlation of the CR with the softening point, whereas no correlation is seen for the asphaltenes. In a statistical evaluation, decreasing coefficients of variation are indicative of a to more homogeneity substance (Table 4-63). The dispersion medium have the highest contents of distillable fractions (AG400) whereas asphaltenes supply the highest coke residue (R800).
70
*
60
501
h: t-
*
*
* * X
\
20
40
60
80
100
SP RP.5 (“C) Fig. 4-43 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Distillable Part AG400 versus Softening Point Ring & Ball
120
140
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
207
X
*
*
20
60
40
80
100
120
("C)
SP R&B
Fig. 4-44 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Reaction Rate DTG versus Softening Point Ring & Ball
0
* *
+ Y
*
* * 20
I
0
'
,
,
'
I
50
.
' .
,
I
.
,
100
Penetration
,
.
f
1-
I
.
150 [O. 1 mml
Fig. 4-45 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Crackable Residue CR versus Needle Penetration
'
.
200
250
140
208
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
8o B i t u m e n
1 70
-
60
-
X
h
$8
I
250
*
*
v
g40
* * 60
40
80 SP R&B ( " C )
120
100
Fig. 4-46 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Crackable Residue CR versus Softening Point Ring & Ball
* 20
z
.
~
~
.
r
~
~
~
'
r
"
'
'
!
'
~
~
'
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
209
80
70 60 h
T o P
-
0
Y
-
5 50 bp c, I
Y
a: 0
40
90
20
* x
.
.
I
*
i
zj!
-
*
* .
.
I
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
,
'
.
.
,
'
Fig. 4-48 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Crackable Residue CR of the Dispersion Medium versus Softening Point Ring & Ball of Bitumen
0
I
1
"
'
I
~
1.2
"
I
.
--,
1.4
. 1.6
.
,
,
,
,
1.8
H/C
Fig. 4-49 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Residue at 600 "C R600 (Mean Value) versus Atomic Ratio H/C x Distillation Bitumens o Blown Bitumens
. 2
2 10
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Consequently the mean of the CR shows its highest value in the case of petroleum resins. Table 4-63 shows very high coefficients of variation, showing that the samples have very little homogeneity. The exception is the asphaltenes, which is surprising, bearing in mind that the bitumens supplying those asphaltenes, are of very different origin. As there were only a small number of samples of blown bitumen, no attempt was made to correlate index number with consistency data. Table 4-63: Mean X of the CR for distillation bitumens
X (wt%)
n
i V (%)
50.71 54.08 63.71 43.57
16 16 16 16
22.54 23.49 10.66 4.59
Bitumen Dispersion medium Petroleum resins Asphal tenes
Since the residues at 600 "C and 800 "C do not show any correlation with the consistency data, a statistical evaluation was perfornied (Tables 4-64 and 4-65): Table 4-64: Means X of the coke residue for distillation bitumens X
R600 n
(wt%) Bitumen Dispersion medium Petroleum resins Asphaltenes
21.42 9.73 17.64 52.46
16 16 16 16
+V
-
X
(%)
(wt%)
24.52 24.89 19.73 6.56
16.54 6.74 15.46 48.97
R800 n
+V
("/.I 16 16 16 16
15.69 15.02 11.02 6.64
These coefficients of variation further support the relative homogeneity of the asphaltenes, whereas the dispersion medium and the petroleum resins are heterogeneous, and this is the source of the inconsistent values of the bitumens themselves. The coefficients of variation for the blown bitumens are even larger, but it is impossible to decide whether that is due to the heterogeneous nature of the samples or to the small number of samples (Table 4-65): Table 4-65: Means X of the coke residue for blown bitumens X
R600 n
(wt%) Bitumen Dispersion medium Petroleum resins Asphaltenes
22.02 8.70 12.34 52.4
5 5 5 5
+V
-
X
(%)
(wt%)
8.94 26.77 31.98 8.30
15.74 3.90 7.88 43.28
R8OO n
i V
(%I 4 5 5 5
30.08 48.85 38.86 14.28
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
21 1
Nevertheless there is a trend for the coke residue to rise from the dispersion medium towards the asphaltenes, and this is related to the atomic ratio H:C. Fig. 4-49 shows the plot of the means of R600 versus the means of H:C. The means of R800 versus the means of H:G give a similar plot. The fact that the formation of coke is not complete at 600 “C in every case, has already been proved by other means. This is confirmed by comparing the data of R600 and R800, with the mean of the colloid component, but this calls in question to a certain extent the importance of the values of the Conradson coke residue.
4.3.2.1.2 Correlation of index numbers with analysis data The term ‘average molecular weight’ is not entirely accurate: it would be more correct to use the term ‘average relative particle mass’ since the vapour pressure osmometry method does not distinguish between molecules and molecular aggregates in solution. The average molecular weight @ is the deciding factor for the start temperature of the evaporation, and for the fraction of the bitumens and their dispersion medium which can still be separated by distillation (AG400 in wt%) (Fig. 4-50 to 4-53). Correlation of the start temperatures of the evaporation, T5 %, for the bitumens and their dispersion medium, with the data representing the molecular mass or size can be expressed by an exponential function. The correlation is not exact for the petroleum resins, and even less for the asphaltenes. The data for most of the blown bitumens do not fit the function as closely as the values for the distillation bitumens.
400
Bitumen
X
350
X
I
U I
ae 300 m
+ 250
y*
L
*
200
I 700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
Molecular Weight (Mean)
Fig. 4-50 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Vaporization Start Temperature T5 % versus Mean Molecular Weight of Bitumens x Distillation Bitumens * Blown Bitumens
2 12
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
aoo goo 1000 1100 Molecular Weight (Mean)
700
1200
Fig. 4-51 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Distillable Part AG400 versus Mean Molecular Weight x Distillation Bitumens * Blown Bitumens Y
4
340
X X
-
320
X
x X
300
-"
-
..
0280
-
x ,260
-.
+ 240
*
200 400
. 500
600
,7-,---.---?-
700
BOO
900
1000
Molecular Weight (Mean)
Fig. 4-52 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Vaporization Start Temperature T5 % versus Mean Molecular Weight of the Dispersion Medium x Distillation Bitumens * Blown Bitumens
For the distillable fraction AG400 there is only a weak correlation with the molecular weight 2,but the correlation is good for the dispersion medium and the petroleum resins, which are the main components of the distillable fraction. The data of these components from blown bitumens also show a small scattering around the regression curve.
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
213
X X X
I . . . . ~ . " ' ~ " " ~ ' . . ' " ' " " " ' ~ ' ' 400
500
600
700
800
I000
900
Molecular Weight (Mean)
Fig.4-53 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Distillable Part AG400 versus Mean Molecular Weight of the Dispersion Medium x Distillation Bitumens
*
Blown Bitumens
The total colloids (petroleum resins and asphaltenes) can be correlated quite well with the coke residues R600 and R800 (Fig. 4-54 and 4-55). There is no difference between the distillation and the blown bitumens. Correlation of the maxima of the reaction rate DTG with the colloid content gives two straight lines for the distillation bitumens (independent of the origin of the samples) and a third line for the blown bitumens (Fig. 4-56). No other correlations with the colloid content were found, nor were any expected.
28
bp
Bitumen
26
I
+J
Y
24
I
=:
22
W
DI-
20
16
1 + P , --
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Colloids ( W t - % )
Fig. 4-54 Thennogravimetry of Bitumens Residue at 600 "C R600 versus Total Colloids in Bitumens (Symbols see Table 4-46)
2 14
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
0
-
120
-
100
-
80
-
I 0 -4
X
. S
'E 60 be
u
a + 40
-
20
-
n
15
+ ____II_ 0
Y
*
20
25
30
Colloids
35 40 (kit-%)
45
50
Fig. 4-56 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Reaction Rate DTG versus Total Colloids in Bitumens (Symbols see Table 4-46)
The supposition that the concentration of the dispersion medium determines both the start temperature of the evaporation (Tl % and T5 %) and the quantity of evaporation loss up to 400 "C (AG400) has been confirmed (Fig. 4-57 and 4-58). A distinct difference between distillation and blown bitumens is evident.
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
215
Bitumen 360
+ +
340 320
-,y
300
-
280
2 260 k-
240 220 200
50
Jj:... 60 70 D i s p e r s i o n Medium
ao
90
(Wt-%)
Fig. 4-57 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Vaporization Start Temperature 7'5 % versus Concentration of Dispersion Medium x Distillation Bitumens * Blown Bitumens
Bitumen
60
-:
-50 -0
I
+ 3
1
.
40
0
.
-
'
$30
u
.
220
-
d
.
a l -
a
10
.
-
0 l " " I " " ~ " " ~ ' . 50 55 60
T_p__r__c( 65
D i s p e r s i o n Medium
70
75
80
(Wt-%)
Fig. 4-58 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Distillable Part AG400 versus Concentration of Dispersion Medium x Distillation Bitumens * Blown Bitumens
The maxima of the reaction rate can also be correlated with the concentration of the petroleum resins (Fig. 4-59), and the difference between the distillation and the blown bitumens is repeated. Further correlation with the content of petroleum resins was not been found.
2 16
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
0
0
5
10
15
Petroleum Resins
25
20
(Wt-%)
Fig. 4-59 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Reaction Rate DTG versus Concentration of Petroleum, Resins (Symbols see Table 4-46)
The asphaltenes are responsible for the formation of coke residue due to their high content of condensed aromatic ring systems. This is shown by the correlation of the coke residues R600 or R800 with the contents of asphaltenes (Fig. 4-60). Independent of the origin of the samples, two straight lines result for the distillation bitumens, whereas the data of the blown bitumens fit a third line with a steeper slope. Correlation of the maxima of the reaction rate DTG upon the concentration of asphaltenes presents a similar picture (Fig. 4-61).
r
25 Bitumen
* 5
--,-.7---.
. . ,
.
.
,
.
Fig. 4-60 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Residue at 800 "C R800 versus Concentration of Asphaltenes (Symbols see Table 4-46)
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
10
15
20
25
30
35
217
40
Asphal tenes (Wt-%)
Fig. 4-61 Thermogravimetry of Bitumens Reaction Rate DTG versus Concentration of Asphaltenes (Symbols see Table 4-46)
The temperature which marks the beginning of thermal cracking (pyrolysis) must be known for the production and manufacture of bitumens. This temperature may be determined according to the method of Z. Adony [4-141 (see chapter 4.2.7). The results of such an evaluation are given in Table 4-66. These values, TB,do not correlate with analysis or consistency data, so statistical evaluation was used (Tables 4-67 and 4-68). Since the mean temperatures for the blown bitumens are somewhat doubtful, because the number of samples was small, they were not compared with the corresponding mean temperatures for the distillation bitumens, nor with each other. Comparison of the means for the distillation bitumens shows that the crack temperature of the bitumens is the same as that of the petroleum resins. The crack temperatures of the dispersion medium are lower, and those of the asphaltenes are higher. The supposition that the weight loss up to 400 "C (AG400) represents the upper limit for the distillable fraction at atmospheric pressure has been confirmed by these experiments.
4.3.2.2 Thermogravimetry in air Thermogravimetry in air was carried out with the same heating and gas flow rates as for the experiments in argon. Tables 4-69 to 4-72 give the results for distillation and blown bitumens as well as for some dispersion media, petroleum resins, and asphaltenes. Up to a temperature of approximately 250 "C the TGA curves of the experiments in air are the same as those in argon (Fig. 4-62). Even during the experiments in air there is a small weight loss from evaporation, which can start, for some bitumens and their colloidal components, at temperatures below 200 "C. In contrast to the experiments in argon, the
2 18
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-66: Start temperature of the cracking process T, (TG 750) Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I
II 111
IV V
Type of Bitumen
Bitumen
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 VR B 200 VR B 130 VR B 80 VR B 65 B 200 B 10 laboratory product 100125 85/40 85/25 100125
400 406 415 390 387 389 374 376 385
Table 4-67: Means
Dispersion medium
Petroleum resins
Asphaltenes
-
403
3891383 384 375 383 375 379 388
393 394 394 393 391 42 1 39613921385 395 393 405 388
4291440 430 411 429 432 408 419 426 41 1 430 439
390
381
388
412
425
395
393
430
392
367
393
407
385 378 371
374 362 391 267 249 254 262
380 391 395 262 272 425 361
424 406 394 449
-
-
387 361/367
-
-
450
X of start temperature TBfor distillation bitumens
x Bitumen Dispersion medium Petroleum resins Asphaltenes
364
(OC)
392.07 379.64 393.68 420.82
n
+V(%)
15 14 17 17
3.92 2.64 2.10 3.28
Table 4-68: Means 5 of start temperatures T, for blown bitumens
X (“C) Bitumen Dispersion medium Petroleum resins Asphaltenes
371.5 258.0 -
n
* V(%) 2.99 3.12 -
449.5
The very low value for the dispersion medium of the blown bitumens indicate that a distillation process has taken place, rather than cracking. The influence of low boiling flux oils is evident.
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
219
Table 4-69: Thermogravimetry of bitumen in air ~
Sample NO.
Type of Bitumen
T1 %
B 200
198
B 200
T5 %
100 -c
AG
R
200°C
300°C
400 "C
600'C
800°C
DTG
TmX
246
1.o
15.3
35.4
0.4
0.4
254
305
0.1
4.2
29.4
1.6
1.6
B 200
198
248
1.1
15.2
36.1
0.3
0.3
B 80
213
269
0.7
9.5
35.0
0.1
0.1
B 200
235
283
0.2
7.7
30.0
1.0
1 .o
B 80
267
325
0.1
2.7
19.3
1
.o
0.8
B 65
257
324
0.2
2.5
25.0
1.1
0.6
B 45
281
364
1.8
22.9
0.1
0.1
2.33 2.37 2.37 2.10 2.10 3.92 4.15 4 90 8.34 3.39 3.39 3.69 3.91 1.30 5.77 6.51 6.60 2.87 5.38 2.05 3.43 2.48 3.13 4.28 4.78 8.35 1.61 10.02 6.64 3.64 7.66 10.18 2.87 1.68 2.43 2.65 8.16 5.13 8.16 0.62 3.80 1.84 3.00 2.45 4.72 0.78 8.66 4.71 7.70 5.97 10.15 0.32 5.80 5.89 6.96 3.00 6.59 6.96 7.07 6.86 10.71 0.44 7.66 3.17 3.52 5.19 5.63 7.88 9.99
310 331 350 357 379 410 428 460 517 338 350 360 365 383 411 424 430 460 534 352 363 378 402 414 445 512 307 369 385 402 443 501 307 362 371 393 47.4 441 503 325 387 412 473 492 538 305 361 380 407 433 503 308 362 370 378 403
B 25
28 1
360
0.2
- -
1.9
25.0
0.3
0.2
47.4
446 456 462 506 304 364 390 399 420 427 438 509
220
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-69: Thermogravimetry of Bitumen in Air (Continuation) Sample No.
rype of Mumen
T1 %
T5 %
R
AG
100 "C
200 "C
300 "C
$00 "C
600 "C
800 "C
DTG
2.97 1.60 1-89 2.12 2.00 4.40 4.63 4.74 4.46 6.29 2.88 2.70 3.24 3.62 3.91 4.95 5.18 6.04 0.86 9.76 3.60 4.07 6.59 1.29 8.79 7.67 6.55 6.98 8.53 3.04 2.28 3.10 3.74 4.69 5.70 9.06 2.47 1.68 1.78 2.32 2.52 2.76
~
10
B 80
243
290
0.2
6.9
38.0
1.2
1.2
11
VR (B 200)
225
297
0.5
8.9
32.2
1.2
1.1
12
VR (B 130)
274
326
2.5
32.9
0.5
02
VR
269
321
2,7
29.2
1.1
1.o
270
315
3.1
21.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
13
(B 80)
14
VR (B 65)
B 200
15
186
231
1.8
20.9
37.7
7.11
16
B 10
235
300
0.2
5.0
28.9
0.4
0.2
II
100/25
197
238
0.1
18.6
43.2
0
0
m
85/40
186
224
1.6
25.2
38 5
2.0
2.0
~
__
-
3.55 9.03 3.25 3.67 2.70 2.46 3.37 4.00 4.81 5.05 8.95 1.88 17.22 10.17 10.17 5.38 2.94 3.61 3.43 3.12 3.73 6.31 5.41
331 356 370 380 395 414 428 439 455 541 326 341 362 408 414 436 446 552 320 362 40 1 449 535 321 365 416 437 439 519 339 363 405 413 417 441
540 308 349 370 384 392 396 415 438 507 349 359 384 392 409 418 438 447 529 281 360 384 428 535 279 349 353 360 400 419 503
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
Sample No.
IV
V
Type of
AG
221
R
bitiirncn
300 "C
400 "C
600 "C
800 "C
DTG
TIMX
85/25
13.7
35.5
0.5
0.5
1.44
287 358 375 380 390 399 433 519 300 37 I 386 419 445 530
13.3
10Ol25
27 7
0.3
0.3
11 41 3.00 2.73 5.85 9.97 3.97 5.95 1.60 5.76 3.54 3.70 16.69 4.93
Table 4-70:Therrnogravimetry of Dispersion Medium in Air Sample No.
Type of Bitumen
l00OC
I 200°C
R
AG
300°C
400 "C
600 "C
800 "C
B 200
19.4
34.0
1.2
1.1
B 80
5.9
24.0
2.0
1.8
B 80
11.1
35.8
1.2
1.2
100/25
26.4
59.9
4.0
0.5
85/40
41.8
65.0
0
0
85/25
31.9
48.8
0.2
0
~
-
DTG -
3.27 8.23 3.82 3.38 4.91 4.36 1.03 2.84 2.39 2.72 2.07 3.15 3.75 5.25 4.88 4.88 4.34 2.31 1.82 1.89 2.10 2.10 4.78 1.53 1.71 1.24 1.89 2.54 2.71 4,19 2.26 2.04 2.92 2.20 3.03 3.08 3.20
TmaX
315 363 400 420 445 555 340 383 419 477 546 331 312 414 441 552 320 400 423 430 471 556 294 344 363 377 385 450 520 303 352 373 391 413 440 450 518
222
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-71: Thermogravimetry of Petroleum Resins in Air. ~
~
T1 %
Sample No.
R
AG
T5 % 100 "C
~
200 "C
-
300 "C
400 'C ~
600 "C
__
800 "C
DTG
1.09 2.17 2.40 2.57 5.43 6.69 6.63 8.40 8.17 7 77 0.43 1.08 1.60 2.07 2 59 2.20 1.68 146 1.20 1.39 2.03 2.28 3.29 5.13 5.64 4.88 5.07 5.31 2.41 2.90 2.69 4.76 2 56 5 00 3.25 3.31 5 63 3.13 2.09 5 19 2.36 3.14 5.25 2.62
Tmax _ __ ___ _
B 200
145
210
4.0
13 9
24.7
4.1
4.1
B 80
236
314
0.7
3.7
14.2
1.1
1.o
B 80
232
315
0.6
3.5
13.7
1 20
0.95
100/25
169
204
4.0
44.3
63.2
1.0
0.7
85/40
188
238
1.7
18.9
38.4
4.5
1.7
85/25
203
256
1.0
12.9
36.2
5.2
2.0
-
- __
Table 4-72: Thermogravimetry of Asphaltenes in Air
5.31 4.39 9.74 9.58
287 357 377 402 427 4.38 452 462 467 526 331 383 408 434 445 483 545 362 372 390 404 419 430 446 466 522 570 281 362 419 447 521 305 378 408 428 448 556 325 388 412 429 456 521
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
0
200
4 00
6 00
223
800
Fig. 4-62 Thermogravimetry of Bitumen and its Colloidal Components in Air (TG 750) Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Bitumen B80 Sample 6 Curve 2: Dispersion medium Curve 3: Petroleum resins Curve 4: Asphaltenes
TGA curves in air flatten more or less distinctly at approximately 350 "C as a consequence of the formation of non-volatile oxidation products. This levelling of the curve does not occur in the case of asphaltenes. In a temperature range from 400 to 550 "C combustion takes place marked by a near lineal decrease of the TGA curve. In this range consecutive and/or simultaneous cracking and oxidation processes may take place with the formation of highly volatile and solid intermediates as well as of combustion products such as CO,, SO,, NO,. Above 550 "C only ash remains. The DTG curves have up to ten maxima, in the temperature range from 280 to 550 'C, except for the asphaltenes, which usually only have two maxima between 450 and 550 "C. The start temperature of the oxidation reaction, marked by the temperature of the first maximum of the DTG curve, and the end of the reaction (last maximum) may be elucidated using statistics (Tables 4-73 to 4-76). The peak heights, and therefore the DTG values, increase with increasing temperature. The peaks of the distillation and blown bitumens, and of the petroleum resins, occur most often at temperatures of approximately 360 OC, 380 'C, 410 OC, and 440 "C. These are due to the reaction of compounds of different susceptibility to oxidation and to pyrolysis, which are present in the bitumens and their components.
224
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-73: Oxidation start (TmJ -
Substance
n
X
V
[*%I
["CI
323.4 292.0 317.2 315.2 469.4
Distillation bitumen Blown bitumen Dispersion Medium Petroleum resins Asphaltenes
16 5 6 6 6
4.87 4.90 5.39 9.61 4.66
Table 4-74: Comparison of the means of oxidation start temperatures (% statistical difference significancy)
Distillation bitumen Dispersion Medium Petroleum resins
Blown Bitumen
Dispersion Medium
Petroleum Resins
Asphaltenes
99.9
none
-
-
none none
> 99.9 > 99.9 > 99.9
-
-
~~
Table 4-75: End of oxidation (TmJ -
n
X
V
[+%I
["CI 521.6 533.2 541.2 531.8 531.2
Distillation bitumen Blown bitumen Dispersion Medium Petroleum resins Asphaltenes
16 5 6 6 6
3.19 4.22 3.24 2.82 2.94
Table 4-76: Comparison of the means of oxidation end temperatures (% statistical differences significancy
Distillation bitumen Dispersion medium Petroleum resins
Blown bitumen
Dispersion medium
Petroleum resins
Asphaltenes
90.0
99.0
-
-
none none
none none none
-
The asphaltenes do not contain any compounds which react below 450 "C. Correlation of the oxidation behavior with the chemical composition, for example the aromacity, was unsuccessful. Any investigation as to whether the temperature of the oxidation peaks might be coordinated to the chemical nature of these substances, should first be tried using pure chemicals.
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
225
In principle the start of the oxidation reaction ought to be recognized by comparing the TGA curves of corresponding experiments in air and in argon. It is now known that measurement of the oxidation process using DSC will supply more precise results. The residues at 600 "C and 800 "C are very small and relatively constant (Tables 4-69 to 4-72). They represent the inorganic part of the samples. The sample weight for thermogravimetry is only 5 mg and the experimental error is so great that exact determination of the ash content by thermogravimetry is not valid, especially for substances with ash content below 5 wt%.
4.3.3 Isothermal aging tests by thermogravimetry Aging behavior is usually simulated by measuring the weight loss after thermal treatment in a rotating flask according to DIN 25 017 (similar to ASTM D 2872-85). The test temperature is 165 "C, duration 150 minutes. During the test, air passes through the flask with a flow rate of 500 cm3/min. For comparison the test is often repeated using inert gas instead of air, in order to decide whether the weight loss is a consequence of evaporation or of oxidation. The present results of thermogravimetry indicate that 165 "C is still too low a temperature to initiate an oxidation process. Therefore isothermal aging tests were carried out for 120 minutes at 250 "C both in argon and in air. Samples of approximately 5 mg weight were Table 4-77:Isothermal aging of bitumen in argon (25cm3/min). T(const.) = 250 "C weight loss [%I Sample No. Type 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 I I1
III IV V
B 200 B200 B200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 VR(B 200) VR(B 130) VR(B 80) VR(B 65) B200 laboratory product 100/25 85/40 85/25 100125
1
5
10
15
30
60
90
120
3.7 1.7 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.5 1.6 1.3 0.7 0.8 0.7 5.9 0.9 5.5 5.7 3.9 6.4
7.2 2.7 1.5 1.4 0.9 0.9 0.9 3.0 2.7 1.1 1.5 1.2 11.1 1.8 11.7 12.1 8.3 10.6
9.9 3.5 2.4 2.0 1.2 1.2 1.2 4.7 4.1 1.6 2.2 1.4 15.0 2.6 16.7 17.1 11.9 13.5
11.8 4.1 3.2 2.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 5.9 5.2 2.0 2.8 1.7 17.7 3.2 20.0 20.5 14.5 15.2
15.4 5.6 4.8 3.9 2.0 2.3 2.3 9.0 7.7 3.0 4.3 2.3 22.2 5.0 26.0 27.0 19.3 18.0
19.0 7.5 7.1 5.8 3.0 3.1 3.5 12.8 10.8 4.9 6.4 3.3 26.8 7.7 31.4 33.3 24.3 21.2
22.0 9.2 8.3 6.9 4.0 3.7 4.2 15.3 12.5 6.0 8.0 4.3 29.0 9.5 34.3 36.7 27.2 23.0
23.7 10.5 9.0 8.2 5.0 4.2 5.0 17.0 14.0 7.0 9.2 5.2 30.8 10.8 36.1 38.8 29.2 24.5
226
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-78: Isothermal aging in air (25 cm3/min). T = 250 "C weight loss [%] Sample No.
1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 I 11 I11 IV V
1
5
10
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 V R(B 200) V R(B 130) VR(B 80) VR(B 65) B 200 laboratory product 100125 85/40 85/25 100/25
15
30
60
90
120
15.2 5.5 6.6 4.4 3.0 2.2 4.0 6.7 7.1 3.7 5.3 2.7 19.4 5 20.7 21.9 14.7 16.8
17.9 8.1 8.3 6.8 4.7 3.1 5.0 9.3 10.2 6.7 7,7 4.7 22.8 7 22.0 22.8 16.2 19.3
18.2 10.0 8.5 7.3 5.2 3.2 5.4 9.7 10.7 7.9 8.0 5.3 23.1 7.1 22.0 23.1 16.5 19.5
18.5 11.0 8.7 7.4 5.5 3.4 5.5 9.8 11.0 8.2 8.1 5.5 23.3 7.2 22.0 23.1 16.5 19.5
[mini
Type
3.0 1.5 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.2 4.0 0.7 -
4.8
6.0 2.3 2.0 1.1 0.8 0.8 1.3 2.3 1.9 0.8 1.3 0.5 8.8 1.5 2.9 2.5 1.5 8.8
8.7 3.1 3.0 1.8 1.3 1.1 1.9 3.4 3.2 1.4 2.2 0.8 12.5 2.5 9.9 9.0 6.3 11.6
10.7 3.8 4.1 2.4 1.7 1.2 2.5 4.3 4.5 2.0 3.0 1.3 14.9 3.2 14.8 13.7 9.7 13.5
heated up to 250 "C constant temperature by applying a heating rate of 100 K/min, and maintaining this temperature for 120 minutes. The results of the tests in air and argon are shown in Tables 4-77 and 4-78. Isothermal aging of a series of distillation bitumens from B200 to B45 (samples 5-8) is given in argon (Fig. 4-63) and in air (Fig. 4-64). A direct comparison of the aging in air and argon of a distillation bitumen B200 (sample 15) is given in Fig. 4-65 and for a blown bitumen 100/25 (sample V), in Fig. 4-66. It is evident that the aging behavior of the distillation bitumens is not uniform. Some of them undergo higher weight loss in argon than in air (for example: sample 15, bitumen B200, in Fig. 4-65) whereas others exhibit higher weight loss in air (for example bitumen B65, sample 7) (Tigs 4-63 and 4-64) as does the blown bitumen (Fig. 4-66). A quotient Q = weight loss in air divided by weight loss in argon signifies: Q < 1.0 loss in argon higher than in air Q = 1.0 equal losses in air and in argon Q > 1.0 loss in air higher than in argon
Table 4-79 shows that the quotient Q generally rises with increasing duration of test, passes through a maximum and decreases thereafter. There is a relationship with the consistency, as shown in Fig. 4-67 for the distillation bitumens B200, B80, B65, and B45.
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Time ( m i n )
Fig. 4-63 Isothermal Thermogravimetry at 250 "C (TG 750) Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min Sample 5 Distillation Bitumen B200 Sample 6 Distillation Bitumen B80 Sample 7 Distillation Bitumen B65 Sample 8 Distillation Bitumen B45
10
,
-x
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Time ( m i n )
Fig. 4-64 Isothermal Thermogravimetry at 250 "C (TG 750) Atmosphere: Air 25 cm3/min Sample 5 Distillation Bitumen B200 Sample 6 Distillation Bitumen B80 Sample 7 Distillation Bitumen B65 Sample 8 Distillation Bitumen B45
140
227
228
-
4 Themoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
30
M I 42
x 20 m YI
0 4
10
0 0
20
40
60
100
80
120
140
Time ( m i n )
Fig. 4-65 Isothermal Thermogravimetry at 250 "C (TG 750) Distillation Bitumen B200 Sample 5 Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Argon Curve 2: Air
30
25
'+
i
/ +
' /
-J
---
?O
a
0
M
x
15
m VI
10
2
5
0
L
,
0
20
,
.
I
40
.
.
1
I
60
80
100
120
Time (rninl
Fig. 4-66 Isothermal Thermogravimetry at 250 "C (TG 750) Blown Bitumen 100/25 Sample V Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Argon Curve 2: Air
140
4.3 Investigations on bitumen Table 4-79:
Sample No. 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 I I1 III IV V
Quotient Q =
Loss in Air Loss in Argon
1
5
10
0.81 0.88 1.80 0.50 0.80 1.oo 1.40 0.69 0.54 0.57 0.75 0.29 0.68 0.78
0.83 0.86 1.33 0.79 0.89 0.89 1.44 0.77 0.70 0.73 0.87 0.42 0.72 0.83 0.25 0.21 0.18 0.83
0.71 0.89 1.20 0.90 1.08 0.92 1.58 0.92 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.57 0.83 0.96 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.86
Type B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 V R(B 200) VR(B 130) VR(B 80) VR(B 65) B 200 laboratory product 100125 85/40 85/25 100125
-
0.75
15 30 [min] 0.91 0.93 1.28 0.92 1.13 0.80 1.67 0.73 0.87 1.00 1.07 0.76 0.84 1.00 0.74 0.67 0.67 0.89
2
YI w _I 0
-
1
L .r
4
.-
S
0.5
w
w
0
_I
" U
229
0
Fig. 4-67 Isothermal Thermogravimetry at 250 "C (TG 750) Quotient Q (Loss in Airboss in Argon) versus Time Sample 5 Distillation Bitumen B200 Sample 6 Distillation Bitumen B80 Sample 7 Distillation Bitumen B65 Sample 9 Distillation Bitumen B25
0.99 0.98 1.38 1.13 1.50 0.95 1.74 0.74 0.92 1.23 1.23 1.17 0.87 1.00 0.80 0.81 0.76 0.93
60
90
120
0.94 1.08 1.17 1.17 1.57 1.00 1.43 0.73 0.94 1.37 1.20 1.42 0.85 0.91 0.70 0.68 0.67 0.91
0.83 1.09 1.02 1.06 1.30 0.86 1.29 0.61 0.86 1.32 1.oo 1.23 0.80 0.75 0.64 0.63 0.61 0.85
0.78 1.05 0.97 0.90 1.10 0.81 1.10 0.58 0.58 1.17 0.90 1.06 0.76 0.67 0.61 0.60 0.57 0.77
230
4 Therrnoanalytical Investigcitions on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
The influence of the concentration of the dispersion medium or the maltenes and their average relative particle mass is seen. If we define this influence using factors:
a
P , = (concentration of dispersion medium) . p2 = (concentration of petroleum resins) . G, the plot of the maximum value of Q (Q,,) versus P , or versus ( P , + P2) shows a degree of correlation (Fig. 4-68 and 4-69). The coefficients of correlation are not very high but they do reveal a trend ( r = 0.64 and r = 0.70). Isothermal thermogravimetry has the advantage that the actual weight loss at any time is visible, so it is possible to determine whether the process is still running or is already complete. In the test according to DIN 52 017 a final value is found only after test duration of 150 minutes. Comparison of the tests in air and in argon using the quotient Q shows the passage through a maximum after a certain duration of the test, which cannot be recognized in the test according to DIN 52 017. Nor is it possible to tell from the DIN test whether the weight losses are a result of the evaporation of highly volatile parts of the bitumen or of volatile oxidation products. A practical example for the behavior of a bitumen B80 (sample 6) during manufacture is shown in Fig. 4-70 and 4-71. Fig. 4-70 shows the plot of weight loss versus time at three different isothermal temperatures, for virgin material. Fig. 4-71 shows a similar plot for the bitumen after passage through the asphalt mixing plant (extracted sample). Differences between the virgin and the extracted material are not visible at test temperatures of 200 "C and 250 "C but appear above 300 "C. The plots of weight loss versus temperature with time as parameter (Fig. 4-72 and 4-73) show the differencesmore clearly. The behavior of the virgin material may be described by an exponential function. The behavior of the extracted material is described by a linear function. The small differences between the samples at the test temperatures 200 "C and 250 "C indicate only losses of volatile portions. Even at 300 "C there is no difference between the samples until the test 2 ,
1.6 i.B
g
1.4
i
x
x
L 3
1.2
1 0.8 0.6
1
30
40
50
60
Pi
Fig. 4-68 Maxima of Quotient Q versus Product P1
70
80 ri~3
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
23 1
duration is 30 minutes. After 60 minutes the difference is 2.5 wt% and after 300 minutes the loss from the virgin material exceeds that of the extracted material by 6.8 wt% (or 30 % relatively). These results do not permit positive identification of the source of the differences between the samples. This may be evaporation of some volatile parts during the mixing process; losses due to the formation of volatile oxidation products; or losses during evaporation of the chloroform extraction fluid. The exponential function AG =AT) for the
x X
30
6a
50
40
Pi
+
70
80
90
"103
P2
Fig. 4-69 Maxima of Quotient Q versus Sum of Products P1 + P2
35 30
2 0
10
5 0
a
50
100
im 200 Time (rnin)
250
300
350
Fig. 4-70 Isothermal Thermogravimetry in Air (TG 750)
Distillation Bitumen B80 Sample 6, Virgin Material Weight Loss versus Time Parameter: Temperature
232
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
virgin material indicates an oxidation process, whereas the extracted sample may not contain compounds which can be oxidized under the conditions of the TGA experiments. This may explain the linearity of the function AG =f(T) for the extracted material.
25
20
5
0 50
0
100
150
200
250
300
350
Time (min)
Fig. 4-71 Isothermal Thermogravimetry in Air (TG 750) Distillation Bitumen B80 Sample 6, Extracted Sample after Asphalt Mixing Process Weight Loss versus Time Parameter: Temperature
35
-
30
-
25
e
.
I
2 20 3 y1
m 0
.
15
--
10
-
-
A
-
30 '
5 -
0
-
1-
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
Temperature ("C)
Fig. 4-72 Isothermal Thermogravimetry in Air (TG 750) Distillation Bitumen B80 Sample 6, Virgin Material Weight Loss versus Temperature Parameter: Time
320
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
I
233
300' 240
'
$80 '
120 '
60 '
30 '
1
10 '
-I
. , . . . , . . . , ~ . . , . . . , . . . , . . . , . . . , . . . 160
180
220
200
240
260
280
300
320
Temperature ( " C )
Fig. 4-73 Isothermal Thermogravimetry in Air (TG 750) Distillation Bitumen B80 Sample 6, Extracted Sample after Asphalt Mixing Process Weight Loss versus Temperature
Parameter: Time
4.3.4 Differential scanning calorimetry DSC 4.3.4.1 Test in argon at atmospheric pressure The tests were carried out in argon atmosphere at 1 bar pressure and a flow rate of 5 cm3/min. The sample weight was between 1.5 and 4.0 mg. The maxima of energy consumption in the DSC curves lie at temperatures between 448 and 496 "C.The resulting coefficients of the Arrhenius equation calculated according to ASTM E 698-79 and the conversion factor, U , are shown in Table 4-80. No correlation could be shown for the activation energy E or the frequency factorA with analytical data. Statistical evaluation of the peak maximum temperatures of the distillation bitumens results in means with coefficients of variation 2 V = 1.01 % maximum. When using these means in the calculation, the following average values of the Arrhenius coefficients are found: E = 204.5 (kJ/Mol) log A = 14.362 (min-') When individual data from Table 4-80 are used, the mean for E is insignificantly smaller, but has a significant larger coefficient of variation. There is no significant difference
234
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-80: Arrhenius coefficients and conversion for DSC pyrolysis in 1 bar argon: Distillation bitumen Sample No. Type
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 V R (B 200) V R (B 130) V R (B 80) V R (B 65) B 200 B 10
Mean X Coefficient of variation V+ %
E (kJ/Mol)
log A (min-')
u (%I
196.1 178.2 192.0 180.1 225.6 226.0 196.1 219.4 198.8 179.3 211.2 211.7 205.0 176.5 196.3 213.1
13.804 12.512 13.467 12.656 14.888 15.824 13.629 15.293 13.854 12.520 14.830 15.016 14.561 12.345 13.850 15.099
85.70 85.70 85.22 84.58 85.58 83.01 81.25 80.82 79.84 81.40 84.09 83.72 83.47 82.51 85.08 78.94
200.33 8.27
13.970 8.14
83.17 2.60
between the average value of E and the mean from Table 4-80. The mean of the conversion is 83.17 % k V = 2.60 % (relative). The plot of the resulting half life time against the temperature is shown in Fig. 4-74. Extrapolation to lower temperatures shows the considerable thermal stability of the bitumens at manufacturing temperatures, provided that air is excluded. If bitumens are regared as model substances for heavy residues, then their Arrhenius coefficients can serve as the basis for the calculation of the kinetics of pyrolysis reactions in thermal conversion processes (thermal cracking, visbreaking, hydrotreating etc.). Integration of the peak areas gives a value for the energy required for pyrolysis reactions. The peak temperatures are not so uniform for the blown bitumens, so only the individual data are given in Table 4-81.
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
I
250
3CO
LOO
450
ti 12 [ T i n I
-loo
'
I
235
SO0 550 600zp["c 1
\!
I I
! A l l 1 i
I\!
I I
Fig. 4-74 Pyrolysis of Distillation Bitumen in 1 bar Argon Half Life Time t1,2versus Temperature
Table 4-81: Arrhenius coefficients and argon for blown bitumen. ~
Sample No.
I
II I11 IV V
Type exp. product 100125 Peak I Peak 2 85/40 Peak 1 Peak 2 85/25 Peak 1 Peak 2 100125
DSC
conversions in ~
~
pyrolysis ~
E (W/Mol)
log A (min-')
U (%)
213.6 94.9 238.9 62.2 192.2 78.5 201.8 217.9
15.097 7.902 17.072 5.317 12.458 7.079 14.657 14.660
78.94 81.96 82.29 82.24 80.80
in
1 bar
236
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
The blown bitumens from the same refinery (samples 11-IV) have two peaks each. The first peak represents an evaporation and the second one a pyrolysis reaction. The dispersion medium of those samples generally shows only one peak in the evaporation range (Table 4-82) whereas the petroleum resins exhibit two peaks (Table 4-83). For the asphaltenes, normal pyrolysis behavior with no evaporation peak was observed (Table 4-84). Table 4-82: Arrhenius coefficients and conversion in the DSC pyrolysis in 1 bar argon. Dispersion medium from blown bitumens Sample No. Type
I I1 III IV V
E (kJ/Mol)
exp. product 100/25
85/40 Peak 1 Peak 2 85/25 100125
log A (min-I)
u (%I
-
-
-
81.1 99.7 138.4 93.1 204.0
6.982 8.341 12.041 7.420 14.637
93.95 96.29 96.15 97.01
Table 4-83: Arrhenius coefficients and conversion in the DSC pyrolysis in 1 bar argon Petroleum resins from blown bitumens Sample No. Type
I I1 111 N V
exp.product
100/25 Peak Peak 85/40 Peak Peak 85/25 Peak Peak 100125
1 2 1 2 1 2
E (kJ/Mol)
log A (min ')
u (%I
-
-
-
74.6 244.3 66.9 227.0 63.7 240.6 198.3
7.616 17.308 5.500 16.282 6.018 17.126 15.361
95.85 88.40 90.7 1 89.35
Table 4-84: Anhenius coefficients and conversion of DSC pyrolysis in 1 bar argon. Asphaltenes from blown bitumens. Sample No.
I 11 III IV V
Type exp.product 100/25 85/40 85/25 100/25
E (kJ/Mol)
log A (min-')
u (%I
-
-
-
263.2 241.8 263.7 255.0
18.589 16.996 19.030 18.278
47.14 48.39 50.69 53.28
The conversion decreases from the dispersion medium down to the asphaltenes (Table 4-85):
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
237
Table 4-85: Mean X of the conversion U (%) in DSC pyrolysis of blown bitumens.
Blown bitumen Dispersion medium Petroleum resins Asphaltenes
81.26 95.85 91.08 49.88
5 4 4 4
1.74 1.38 3.65 5.42
Some overlapping of the evaporation and pyrolysis reactions was observed, due to the content of low boiling flux oils, especially in the experiments with separated components of the colloid system. In order to avoid such overlapping as much as possible and to simulate the technical conditions of the crack processes, further investigations on bitumens and their colloid components were carried out in a hydrocarbon atmosphere (methane) at 10 bar pressure.
4.3.4.2 Tests in methane at 10 bar pressure Pyrolysis experiments were carried out in methane at 10 bar pressure and 5 cm3/min gas flow rate. All the experiments were run using at least three different heating rates (between 5 and 50 K/min). The sample weights were between 1.0 and 4.0 mg. The individual data of the Arrhenius coefficients for the bitumens and their colloid components are shown in Tables 4-86 to 4-89. Table 4-86: Arrhenius coefficients and conversion for DSC pyrolysis in 10 bar methane Bitumen Sample No. Type
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 V R (B 200) V R (B 130) V R (B 80) V R (B 65) B 200 B 10
E (kJ/Mol)
log A (min-l)
u (%I
226.2 188.5 192.0 240.4 235.5 242.0 221.8 239.5 238.5 227.3 237.3 229.1 195.8 203.2 208.8 236.7
15.878 13.083 13.390 16,441 16.441 16.885 15.418 16.753 16.756 15.936 16.645 16.231 13.741 14.163 44.649 16.678
84.40 82.95 84.60 83.30 82.91 81.43 79.45 78.44 78.77 80.45 82.48 81.36 81.53 78.70 84.43 77.32
238
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products Bitumen
~~
Sample No. Type
I I1 I11 IV V
exp.product 100/25 85/40 85/25 100125
E (kJ/Mol)
log A (min-I)
u (%I
216.0 239.4 210.5 241.8 235.2
15.250 16.567 15.373 17.202 16.522
77.24 80.45 81.15 79.21 79.44
Table 4-87: Arrhenius coefficients and conversion for DSC pyrolysis in 10 bar Methane. Dispersion medium ~
Sample No. 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I
II 111 IV V
~~
~
Type
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 V R (B 200) V R (B 130) V R (B 80) V R (B 65) B 200 B 10 exp.product 100/25 85/40 85/25 100/25
E (kJ/Mol)
log A (min-')
254.2 219.6 204.6 219.1 212.6 224.3 269.7 244.4 25 1.7 247.7 204.1 239.3 256.0 181.8 208.9 209.0 232.6 234.3 125.7 115.0 123.4 225.5
18.030 15.333 14.322 15.320 14.751 15.364 18.592 16.928 17.542 17.425 14.374 16.877 17.963 12.644 14.613 14.462 16.388 16.360 9.405 8.394 8.654 15.879
lJ
(a)
93.46 89.92 95.33 93.47 93.57 91.45 91.67 90.62 93.13 90.15 93.77 89.24 91.31 91.61 94.30 93.20 95.37 95.46 94.26 -
93.75 94.91
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
Table 4-85: Arrhenius coefficients and conversion for DSC pyrolysis in 10 bar Methane. Petroleum resins Sample No. Type
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I I1
III 1v
V
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 V R (B 200) V R (B 130) V R (B 80) V R (B 65) B 200 B 10 exp.product 100/25 85/40 85/25 100/25
E (kJ/Mol)
log A (min-')
213.2 210.2 211.2 208.2 262.7 297.9 268.4 240.6 233.6 240.5 221.3 223.1 257.0 244.0 224.2 188.5 264.0 235.8 219.9 228.0 240.0
14.879 14.602 14.616 14.290 18.144 20.576 18.650 16.516 16.151 16.751 15.426 15.579 17.961 17.064 15.567 13.214 18.547 17.220 15.667 16.118 16.911
("/.I 81.07 74.31 81.95 87.52 84.91 86.28 8 1.45 84.98 82.23 78.37 84.42 80.15 85.49 83.45 80.54 77.03 89.71 92.97 86.08 87.25 87.25
Table 4-89: Arrhenius coefficients and conversion for DSC pyrolysis in 10 bar Methane. Asphaltenes Sample No. Type
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 V R (B 200) V R (B 130) V R (B 80) V R (B 65) B 200 B 10
E (H/Mol)
log A (min-')
U (%)
242.0 212.7 224.8 193.9 212.0 249.1 234.0 244.7 221.1 246.2 213.5 220.6 243.5 228.2 214.2 229.3
16.968 14.923 15.508 13.166 14.591 17.304 16.156 16.912 15.365 17.366 15.089 15.422 16.893 15.935 14.804 16.015
48.35 50.45 46.98 46.38 46.50 45.19 44.65 44.97 51.29 47.36 49.51 50.88 51.04 49.20 48-22 54.11
239
240
4 Tlzermoanalyticul Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Asphaltenes Sample No. Type I I1 UI IV V
E (kJ/Mol)
log A (min-')
U (%)
238.0 228.1 200.0 213.5 242.2
16.655 16.221 14.296 15.088 17.312
51.23 50.48 46.86 48.97 51.28
exp.product 100/25 85/40 85/25 100/25
Statistical evaluation of the peak maximum temperatures of the distillation bitumens gives very small coefficients of variation, as shown in Table 4-90.
Table 4-90 Maxima of the coefficients of variation for the peak temperatures from the pyrolysis of distillation bitumens in 10 bar methane. +V (%) Bitumen Dispersion medium Petroleum resins Asphaltenes
0.47 0.82 0.61 0.62
The coefficients of variation of the means of the conversions show considerably more scattering (Table 4-91).
Table 4-91: Coefficients of variation for the conversions from the pyrolysis of distillation bitumens in 10 bar methane. + V (%) Bitumen Dispersion medium Petroleum resins Asphaltenes
3.06 1.67 10.74 5.45
The very low variance of the means of the peak maximum temperatures permit their use in calculating the averages of the Arrhenius coefficients (Table 4-92). Again, there are only small differencesbetween the average values of the activation energy E and the means of E from the individual data of the Tables 4-86 to 4-89, with no statistical significance.
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
241
Table 4-92: Average values of the Arrhenius coefficients and the conversion for the pyrolysis of distillation bitumens in 10 bar methane.
Bitumen Dispersion medium Petroleum resins Asphaltenes
E (kJ/Mol)
log A (min-')
u (%I
222.8 225.5 232.0 226.1
15.638 15.744 16.094 15.709
81.16 92.39 82.58 48.61
There is no statistical difference in the Arrhenius coefficients between the bitumen and the dispersion medium, nor between the petroleum resins and the asphaltenes. The statisti250
300
w)O
450 Ii
500 /
5y
600Gc
l
Fig. 4-75 Pyrolysis of Distillation Bitumen and its Colloidal Components in 10 bar Methane Half Life Time t1,2versus Temperature Line 1: Distillation bitumen Line 2: Dispersion medium Line 3: Petroleum resins Line 4: Asphaltenes
242
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
cal significance of the difference between the Arrhenius coefficients of the dispersion medium and the asphaltenes is only 95 %. For the other differences the statistical significance is as high as 99.9 %. A comparison of the means of the corresponding peak temperatures shows that there is a significant difference (99.9 %) between the data from the experiments in 1 bar argon and in 10 bar methane, whereas the means of the conversions do not exhibit significant differences. Experimental results confirm the theory that a reaction is rendered more difficult by increasing pressure, which causes an increase of volume due to the formation of gases and vapors (LeChatelier's principle). Differences in the Arrhenius coefficients for the three components of the colloid system (the dispersion medium, petroleum resins, and asphaltenes) do exist, but prove to be smaller than was at first assumed. The straight lines for the distillation bitumens and their colloid components in the plot of half life time, tliz, versus temperature run almost parallel, because the differences in the Arrhenius coefficients are small (Fig. 4-75). Even the corresponding peak temperatures of the blown bitumens show very small variances in the tests in 10 bar methane and also permit the calculation of statistical means. The resulting coefficients of variation are f 3 . 0 % maximum. This is also true for the colloid components, except for the dispersion medium of the two bitumens: 85/40 (sample 111) and 85/25 (sample IV). Here again a weight loss caused by distillation even occurs under pressure with the consequence of low values for the activation energy and frequency factor. Only the data of the other three samples was included in the statistics. The average values of the Arrhenius coefficients calculated in this manner and the means of the conversion are shown in Table 4-93. Table 4-93: Average values of the Arrhenius coefficients and means of the conversion from the pyrolysis of blown bitumens in 10 bar methane.
Bitumen Dispersion medium Petroleum resins Asphaltenes
E (kJ/Mol)
log A (min-l)
u (%I
239.5 205.4" 236.3 222.6
17.104 14.488" 16.818 15.753
79.50 94.74 88.65
49.76
* from the means of the temperatures of 3 samples Comparison of the means shows that there is a significant difference in the Arrhenius coefficients for distillation and blown bitumens and their colloid components. The conversions only differ for the dispersion medium whereas the bitumens, the petroleum resins, and the asphaltenes do not differ in the conversions, either in 1 bar argon or in 10 bar methane. In the plot of half life time, tli2versus temperature, the differences of the activation energies for the blown Bitumens and their colloid components cause a clear divergence of the straight lines from the parallel (Fig. 4-76).
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
243
Fig. 4-76 Pyrolysis of Blown Bitumen and its Colloidal Components in 10 bar Methane Half Life Time t1,2versus Temperature
Line 1: Line 2: Line 3: Line 4:
Blown bitumen Dispersion medium Petroleum resins Asphaltenes
4.3.4.3 Temperatures of the cracking process The start of the cracking process is marked in the diagram of energy flow versus temperature of the DSC by a change from a nearly linear run, which shows only a small drifting due to the changes in specific heat with increasing temperature, to one with a considerable slope. By constructing the tangents to the induction period and to the curve of the reaction peak, the point of intersection is found, which marks the onset point and its temperature.
244
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-94: Start temperature of the cracking reaction (Tons,,)of bitumen in DSC (p = 10 Klmin). Sample No. Type
Tonset
[“CI in 1 bar argon 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
I I1 IlI
Iv
V
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 V R (B 200) V R (B 130) V R (B 80) V R (B 65) B 200 B 10 exp.product
400 40 1 409 414 405 405 415 415 409 378 413 403 420 390 415 395 375
lOOl25 85/40 85 I25 100125
n.e. 248
n.e. 378
‘onset
t“C1 in 10 bar Methane 400 402.5 -
402 405 406 412.5 410 404 398 406 400 410 405 413 385 385
n.e. n.e. 402 408
n.e.: it was not possible to evaluate this experiment
The temperature of the corresponding maximum of energy consumption in the DSC curve can be used as a second index number for the cracking reaction. DSC experiments with a heating rate p= 10 K/min are used, so that the results may be compared with thermogravimetry. The individual data of the onset temperature for pyrolysis both in 1 bar argon and in 10 bar methane are shown in table 4-94. Table 4-95 gives the onset temperatures of the bitumens and their colloid components from the reaction in 10 bar methane. The small variations of the individual data permit the calculation of statistical means (Table 4-96). There is no correlation with analytical data. Comparison of the means shows a significant difference (99.0 %) between the distillation bitumens and their petroleum resins, and between the dispersion medium and the petroleum resins. The blown bitumen sample is too small to examine correlation. There is no significant difference between the onset temperatures of the distillation and blown bitumens.
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
245
Table 4-95: Start temperature of the cracking reaction (Tonset)of DSC pyrolysis in 10 bar methane (p= 10 K/min). Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I I1 I11 IV V
5Pe
Bitumen
Dispersion medium
Petroleum resins
Asphaltenes
B 200 B 200
400 402.5
B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 V R (B 200) V R (B 130) V R (B 80) V R (B 65) B 200 B 10 Exp. product 100/25 85/40 85/25 100/25
402 405 406 412.5 410 404 398 406 400 410 405 413 385 385 n.e. n.e. 402 408
415 406 397.5 405 399 402.5 415 400 398 385 393 402 395 392 407.5 395 394 385 n.e. 390 408
398 410 408 412.5 410 41 1 400 407.5 417.5 405 411 410 402.5 408 409 403 402 n.e. 400 400 409
402 40 1 402 387 410 398 398 400 398 400 417.5 404 418 403 398 398 410 360 368.75 383 378
-
n.e.: it was not possible to evaluate this experiment
Table 4-96: Means of the start temperature of the cracking reaction Tonsetin the DSC (p= 10 Klmin). ~
1 Destillation bitumen 2 Distillation bitumen 3 Dispersion medium from no.2 4 Petroleum resins from no.2 5 Asphaltenes from no.2 6 Blown bitumen
~~
~
-
n
f V
Reaction conditions
(“C)
1 bar argon
403.65
16
3.20
10 bar methane 10 bar methane
402.94
16
1.93
400.09
16
1.99
10 bar methane
407.35
16
1.23
10 bar methane 10 bar methane
402.62
16
1.90
405.33
4
0.75
X
(%)
246
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Reaction conditions 7 Dispersion medium from no.6 8 Petroleum resins from no.6 9 Asphaltenes from no.6
-
X
n
("C)
f V (%)
10 bar methane
394.25
4
2.5 1
10 bar methane
405.00
4
1.44
10 bar methane
379.95
5
4.99
Comparison of the means of the onset temperatures of the distillation bitumens in 1 bar argon with the the means of the start temperature TBfrom thermogravimetry (Tables 4-67 and 4-68) shows that the difference has only a low significance of 95 %. The maximum of heat flow during the reaction is marked by the corresponding peak temperature (Table 4-97)
Table 4-97: Means of the peak temperatures from the DSC cracking experiments (p= 10 K/min)
1 Distillation bitumen 2 Distillation bitumen 3 Dispersion medium from no.2 4 Petroleum resins from no.2 5 Asphalteues from no.2 6 Blown bitumen 7 Dispersion medium from no.6 8 Petroleum resins from no.6 9 Asphaltenes from no.6
X
Reaction conditions
("C)
1 bar argon
453.96
16
1.01
10 bar methane 10 bar methane
459.95
16
1.36
46 1.49
16
0.82
10 bar methane
468.36
16
0.61
10 bar methane 10 bar methane 10 bar methane
465.51
16
0.55
447.50
5
2.61
442.43
4
6.28
10 bar methane
450.76
5
2.99
10 bar methane
452.09
5
1.62
n
f V
(%I
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
247
Comparison of the means of Table 4-97 gives the following results: Comparison
No. 1 No.2 No. 1 No.3 No.3 No.4 N0.7 No.7 No.8 No.3 No.4 No.5
Significant difference
No.2 No.6 No.6 No.4 No.5 No.5 No.8 No.9 No.9 No.7 No.8 No.9
Comparison of the means of the DSC peak temperatures (Table 4-97) with the means of the DTG maximum temperatures Tmx(Tables 4-60 and 4-62) for the distillation bitumens shows considerably higher temperatures of the DSC peaks even at atmospheric pressure. There is no reasonable explanation for this phenomenon. The higher values of the DSC peak temperatures at increased pressures correspond to the theoretical expectations.
4.3.4.4 Oxidation in air Investigations on the oxidation behavior of bitumen using DSC give precise results [4-23 to 4-27]. The experiments are preferably carried out in air, since the reaction in oxygen runs so fast that the actual sample temperature increases faster than the pre-set heating rate of the instrument. Consequently the temperature of the sample overtakes the temperature of the instrument, and a loop will be plotted in the diagram instead of a measurable peak. The same phenomenon occurs when the sample mass is too large. Even so, the correct peak maximum temperature may be determined by plotting the heat flow versus time, marking the peak maximum and rescaling to heat flow versus temperature. Increased pressure should be applied if the evaporation and the oxidation processes compete within the same temperature range. The application of increased air pressure will increase the boiling temperatures and decrease the oxidation start temperature, due to the increased oxygen partial pressure. The international standard of pressure for DTA and DSC oxidation tests on lubricants is 100 psi (7 bar), and we used this, so that comparisons were feasible. The plot of heat flow versus temperature of the oxidation experiments shows an induction period, which lasts up to approximately 200 O C , followed by three or four distinct peaks. Above a temperature of 500 to 550 "C the oxidation process is complete. Fig. 4-77 shows a diagram of the recorder graph of the DSC oxidation test of the distillation bitumen B65 (sample 9) in 7 bar air at a heating rate p= 20 K/min. The influence of the heating rate
248
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
HIpWI
1
0
100
200
3 00
L 00
5 00 600 T 1°C I
-
Fig. 4-77 Generalized DSC Recorder Graph during Oxidation of Distillation Bitumen B65 Sample 7 Heating Rate p: 20 K/min Atmosphere: Air, 7 bar pressure, 5 cm3/min
on the peak maximum temperatures is the same as that in argon. The kinetics of the oxidation reactions can be calculated according to ASTM E 698-79. The onset temperature and the maximum temperature of the first peak ( T I )are conventionally used as criteria for oxidation stability, and these values are listed in Tables 4-98 to 4-101 for bitumens and their colloid components. A statistical evaluation of the individual data is given in Table 4-102 (heating rate p= 10 K/min). Comparison of the distillation and the blown bitumens reveals differences between Tenser and TI.The colloid components show differences between the means, except for the means of Tonset of the dispersion medium and the asphaltenes. The temperatures of the peak maxima of the bitumens and their colloid components are quite uniform for equal heating rates (p = 5, 10, 20 K/min). Statistical evaluation gives coefficients of variation between f0.7 % and f2.5 % maximum. Therefore, the data were not calculated for the individual samples; instead the average values of the Arrhenius coefficients were calculated using the means of the corresponding peak maximum temperatures. For all the bitumens and their colloid components the first oxidation peak appears between 275 and 325 "C depending on the heating rate. The other peaks do not appear at equal temperatures for all of the samples, but the individual data may be concentrated in groups, whlch have means with low tolerances (Tables 4-103 to 4-107).
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
249
Table 4-98: Onset temperature Tonset and maximum temperature of the 1st peak T I of the oxidation of bitumen in 7 bar air (p = 10 K/min) Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I1 12 13 14 15 I
I1 I11
Iv V
Bitumen
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 V R (B 200) V R (B 130) VR (B 80) V R (B 65) B 200 exper. product 100125 85/40 85/25 100125
["CI
Tl ["Cl
227.50 235.00 200.00 191.25 227.50 225.00 212.50 225.00 215.00 225.00 200.00 220.00 222.50 215.00 220.00 218.75 192.50 182.50 195.00 232.50
297.50 300.00 283.75 285.00 297.50 295.00 295.00 295.00 295.00 300.00 29 1.25 300.00 295.00 297.50 300.00 293.75 285.00 286.25 282.50 293.50
TOllSCt
Table 4-99: Onset temperature Tonset and maximum temperature of the 1st peak TI of the oxidation of dispersion medium in 7 bar air (p= 10 K/min). Sample No.
10 12 15 V
Dispersion medium from B 200 B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 VR (€3 130) B 200 100125
["Cl
T, ["CI
195.00 202.50 195.OO 182.50 192.50 197.50 215.00 200.00 212.50 185.00 180.00 212.50
290.00 300.00 292.50 288.75 290.00 290.00 295.00 292.50 297.50 295.00 290.00 305.00
Tollset
250
4 Thennoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-100: Onset temperature Tonset and maximum temperature TI of the 1st peak of the oxidation of petroleum resins in 7 bar air (p= 10 K/min). Sample No.
1 2 3 5
6 7 8 9 10 12 15 V
Petroleum resins from B 200
Tonset
["el 235
-
B 200 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 V R (B 130) B 200 100/25
285
-
-
205 205 205 200 207.5 220 210 210 207.5 232.5
285 285 287.5 290 287.5 287.5 295 292.5 280 295
Table 4-101:Onset temperature To,,,, and maximum temperature TI of the 1st peak of the oxidation of asphaltenes in 7 bar air (B = 10 K/min). Sample No.
1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 15 V
Asphaltenes from B 200 B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 V R (B 130) B 200 100/25
Tonset
["el
TI ["el
190 190 205 180 182.5 175 190 207.5 185 175 192.5 205
297.5 295 3 10 295 295 300 300 307.5 3 10 307.5 302.5 307.5
Table 4-102: Means of the onset temperature (Tonset) and the maximum temperature T I of the 1st peak of the oxidation in 7 bar air (fi = 10 K/min). TOIlW
V[*%]
T1
V[*%]
217.4 204.3
5.56 10.11
295.2 288.2
1.72 1.78
197.5
5.94
293.9
1.68
212.5
5.47
288.2
1.60
189.8
5.93
302.3
1.98
x ["C] Distillation bitumen Blown bitumen Dispersion medium from distillation bitumen Petroleum resins from distillation bitumen Asphaltenes from distillation bitumen
x ["C]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
SampL No.
VR VR VR VR
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 (B 200) (B 130) (B 80) (B 65) B 200
Temperature range
111.5
9.875
275-320 "C
1
208.2
-
-
208.2
158.9
-
-
158.9 -
14.790
-
-
-
-
-
14.790
11.222
-
-
11.222
420-460 "C
155.4
-
94.3
155.4
-
I-
}
}
-
-
10.496
-
-
148.7
148.7
-
-
148.7 148.7
-
-
-
10.496
-
-
-
-
-
148.7
9.683
-
9.683
-
log A [min-'1
465-520 "C E [k.J/Mol]
-
9.031
10.496
155.4
log A [min-'1
445-490 "C E [k.J/Mol]
Table 4-103: Arrhenius coefficients of the oxidation of distillation bitumen in 7 bar air.
2
g.
38
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 B 80 V R (B 130) V R (B 80) B 200 100125
1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 15 V
E [kJ/Moll
log A [min-']
275-3 15 "C
172.3
-
172.3
E kJiMol1
Petroleum resins from
B 200 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 V R (B 130) V R (B 80) B 200 100125
1 3 6 7 8 9 12 13 15 V
Temperature range
Sample No.
98.5
8.751
log A [rnin-'1
275-305 "C E [kJIMoll
J
I
I
i
134.4
134.4
E [kJIMol]
9.634
9.634
log A [min-'1
400-445 "C
12.567
-
12.567
log A [min-11
4 15-450 "C
Table 4-105: Arrhenius coefficients of the oxidation of petroleum resins in 7 bar air.
Dispersion medium from
Sample No.
Temperature range
Table 4-104: Arrhenius coefficients of the oxidation of dispersion medium in 7 bar air.
J
log A [min-']
-
7.521
log A [min-'1
470-515 "C
E [kTIMoll
-
116.4
E [kJ/Moll
450-510 "C
as 5
9
"a
R
5
a s
s a
U
3
3
a
h)
E
B 200 B 200 B 200 B 200 B 80 B 65 B 45 B 25 V R (B 130) V R (B 80) B 200
1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 15 V
118.8
E [kJ/Moll
9.768
log A [min-'1
280-325 "C
J
171.10 -
171.0
E [kT/Moll
IV
Sample No.
I
85/25 1OOD5
\%?:
exper. product
$1 1
Temperature range
101.4
E [kJ/Mol]
9.078
[mm ' -1 ]
log A
275-300 "C
1
I
1 i 138.3
E [kJ/Mol]
10.258
log A [min-l]
380-425 "C
1
89.2
E [kJ/Mol]
6.028
log A [min-'1
405-460 "C
12.366 -
12.366
log A [min-'1
410-450 "C
Table 4-107: Arrhenius coefficients of the oxidation of blown bitumen in 7 bar air.
100/25
Asphaltenes from
Sample No.
Temperature range
Table 4-106: Arrhenius coefficients of the oxidation of asphaltenes in 7 bar air.
-
9.073 -
-
140.4
152.2 154.0
9.875
9.875 10.660 6.152
log A [min-'1
470-520 "C
E [kJ/Mol]
140.4
9.073
9.073
140.4 -
log A [min-'1
E [kJ/Mol]
465-520 "C
2a
P
s
2
g.
2 6'
254
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
The appearance of up to four peaks, with three in the range 400-500 "C indicate the presence of groups of compounds with different susceptibility to oxidation and the occurrence of a series of consecutive and/or parallel reactions. In order to elucidate this behavior the peak maximum temperatures from experiments with a heating rate p= 10 K/min are listed in Table 4-108. The onset temperature, and the temperature and kinetic data of the first oxidation peak maximum are the criteria which define the practical behavior of bitumens in its applications. Calculation of the reaction rate constants and of the half-life time tin, using the Arrhenius coefficients gives values, which may be reproduced by other methods, although the oxidation does not obey the first order reaction law. The plot of the log t1,2versus the inverse Kelvin temperature (1 000/T) is shown in Fig. 4-78. Correspondinggraphs for the other peaks show the increase in the half-life times. However, they are only of theoretical interest and do not have any relevance to practical behavior in production and manufacturing. Fig. 4-78 and Table 4-102 (Tonset> show that oxidation commences at temperatures which are commonly applied in asphalt mixing plants. This may result in the formation of longlife radicals, which may serve as initiators for the oxidative aging of the binder in the asphalt layer on roads, under the influence of ultraviolet light [4-281. The tests also confirm that the oxidation stability of blown bitumens is inferior to that of distillation bitumens. The average onset temperature of the blown bitumens is about 13 "C below that of distillation bitumens. The activation energy for the first oxidation peak of blown bitumens is approximately 10 W/Mol (or approximately 10 %) below the value of distillation bitumens, with the corresponding consequences for the half-life times. For example, the half-life time of a distillation bitumen is approximately 60 % greater than the half-life time of a blown bitumen (at 200 "C).
5
4
3
2
1
Distillation bitumen Dispersion medium from no.1 Petroleum resins from no.] Asphaltenes from no. 1 Blown bitumen 288.2
302.3
288.2
293.9
295.2
5
11
11
11
15
1.78
1.98
1.60
1.68
1.72
408.0
428.6
422.0
446.25 443.25 430.9
1.18
5
8 2.65
2.75
11
9
-
0.88 0.69
2
5
X
-
428.8
-
-
476.2
468.8
5
-
-
10
8
Peak 3 n V
1.60
-
-
1.69
1.53
[*%I
(p = 10 K/min).
["CI
Table 4-108: Means of the peak maximum temperatures of the DSC oxidation in 7 bar air ~
489.5 476.2 457.5
492.3
489.3
488.6
["CI
X
3 1 1
12
9
5
Peak 4 n
0.54
1.62
1.50
0.26
V [k%]
$
wl
wl
h,
s
0
cl
0
s.
3. 0-a
256
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Fig. 4-78 Low Temperature Oxidation of Bitumens (First DSC Peak) Half Life Time tl,2 versus Temperature (Mean Values) Curve 1: Distillation bitumens Curve 2: Dispersion medium from 1 Curve 3: Petroleum resins from 1 Curve 4: Asphaltenes from 1 Curve 5: Blown bitumens
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
-9.5
I
-60
-40
I
-20 Tempfrotura ('C>
Fig. 4-79 Low Temperature DSC of Bitumen B200 Section of the Heating Curve Heating Rate p : 5 K/min
,
0
I
257
I Genarol V 2 . 2 A DuPont 9900
20
258
4 Thennoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
4.3.5 Low temperature behavior of bitumen Decreasing temperature causes increasing brittleness of bitumes. The breaking point according to Fraalj (DIN 52 012) must not exceed -15 "C for road bitumen B200 and - 2 "C for bitumen B25. Glass transition or second order transition is found at defined temperatures and may be recognized by steps in the heating curves (heat flow versus temperature) of DSC or DTA tests. The appearance of such steps in the cooling curves is less often observed [4-31 to 4-35]. Fig. 4-79 shows an enlarged section of the heating curve of a bitumen, B80, which has a glass transition in the temperature range between -27.6 "C and -10.4 "C (average value -23.0 "C). The brealung point of this bitumen has been determined as -19 "C. Frequently the effects are so small that they may erroneously be ascribed to artefacts, or may be overlooked. In theory the paraffins, such as n-alkanes, may be traced using low temperature DSC, but the lower limit for detection of such substances is approximately 2 %, which is also the upper limit for the paraffin content in road bitumen.
4.3.6 Conclusions from experiments on bitumen 4.3.6.1 Thermogravimetry Thermogravimetry in an inert gas facilitates the determination of correlations of index numbers from TGA, with some consistency and analytical data of bitumens. Correlation of the penetration with the index numbers, T1 %, T5 %, and AG400, produces two groups of similar behavior. A regression line can be calculated for each of the two groups (Fig. 4-38 to 4-40). It is surprising that no correlation was found of the penetration with R800, since R8OO approximately represents the concentration of asphaltenes, and the penetration does correlate with the concentration of asphaltenes themselves. The index numbers mentioned above do not correlate with the penetration of blown bitumen either. A better result was found for the correlation of the penetration with the maximum weight loss rate, DTG. Definite correlations can also be found for the softening point R&B with the index numbers T1 %, T5 %, AG400, and DTG, for the distillation bitumens (Fig. 4-42 to 4-44), but not for the blown bitumens. The correlation of the content of crackable residue, CR, with the penetration is not as good as the correlation of the CR with the softening point R&B for distillation bitumens (Fig. 4-45 and 4-46). Comparable correlations for the dispersion medium of the distillation bitumens result in two regression lines each for the correlation with penetration, whereas only one regression line results for the correlation with the softening point R&B (Fig. 4-47 and 4-48). The results mentioned indicate that the scattering is too large, and therefore the coefficients of correlation are to small, to obtain a positive description of the consistency data of
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
259
bitumens from thermogravimetric index numbers. The sixteen distillation bitumens tested often show two regression lines running more or less parallel. Nevertheless the same bihimens were found on the same regression line in all cases. The separation of the data for blown bitumens from those for distillation bitumens is quite sharp, whereas the semiblown bitumens fall between the other two bitumens. The second objective of this investigation was an attempt to correlate the index numbers of thermogravimetry with analytical data of the bitumens. Very good results were found for the correlation of the means of the residues at 600 "C or 800 "C with the means of the H/C ratio (Fig. 4-49), where coefficients of correlation > 0.97 were found. There is a relationship between the mean molecular weight, the start temperature of the evaporation (T5 %) and the distillable fraction (AG400) for bitumen and its colloid components (Fig. 4-50 to 4-53). The dispersion medium shows the highest values for the coefficients of correlation, which decrease via the petroleum resins down to the asphaltenes. There is no difference between distillation and blown bitumens. The residue at 600 "C or 800 "C respectively may be correlated fairly with the concentration of colloids (total petroleum resins and asphaltenes). Here also the distillation and the blown bitumens fall on the same straight line (Fig. 4-54 and 4-55). Correlation of the maximum of the reaction rate DTG with the concentration of the colloids results in two regression lines for the distillation bitumens, and a third line for the blown bitumens (Fig. 4-56). The concentration of the dispersion medium determines the evaporation start temperature (T1 % or T5 %) of the distillation bitumens (Fig. 4-57). For the blown bitumens no relation was found, but for both the distillation and the blown bitumens a clear correlation of the distillable fraction AG400 with the concentration of the dispersion medium was recognized (Fig. 4-58). The Concentration of petroleum resins influences the maximum of the reaction rate DTG considerably (Fig. 4-59). This correlation exhibits higher coefficients of correlation for the regression lines of the distillation and blown bitumens than does a similar correlation for the sum of colloids. The correlation of the maximum of the reaction rate DTG with the concentration of asphaltenes again results in two lines for the distillation bitumens and a third line for the blown bitumens (Fig. 4-61). Similar behavior was found for the correlation of the residues at 600 "C and 800 "C with the asphaltene content (Fig. 4-60). These results prove a more or less good correlation of some index numbers from thermogravimetry in inert atmosphere with a series of analytical data. We did not at first expect that the coefficients of correlation would be high, since bitumen, as well as its separated colloid components, still represents a multicomponent system of varying composition. The temperature limit of the thermal stability of bitumen and its components was found to be relatively uniform independent of the origin of the samples. Mean values of this temperature with very small coefficients of variation were calculated (Tables 4-67 and 4-68). The sequence of the cracking temperatures: dispersion medium < petroleum resins < asphaltenes
260
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
was as expected. The lower start temperature for the dispersion medium of the blown bitumens is due to the predominating evaporation of low boiling flux oils. Thermogravimetry in air reveals the oxidation behavior of the bitumens. The DTG curve supplies the temperatures at the beginning and end of the oxidation. There was no difference in the oxidation behavior of the colloid components from distillation or from blown bitumens. The origin of the bitumens had no effect. One cannot be certain about the beginning of oxidation of the blown bitumens, their dispersion medium, or their petroleum resins, because this type of bitumen contains relative low boiling flux oils. There are only small, statistically insignificant, differences between the means of the DTG maximum temperatures of the blown bitumens, their dispersion medium and their petroleum resins in air and in argon. Thermogravimetry cannot determine whether evaporation or oxidation takes place. Use of a simultaneous thermal analyzer might prove whether the reaction is exo- or endothermic. The results of the test at constant temperatures, dependent upon the test time, are more interesting for practical application. This experiment may be carried out more easily using a thermobalance, and with better interpretation than the standard test using the rotating flask (DIN 52 017). The experiment in argon and in air provides additional information from quotient Q:
Q
loss in air = loss in argon.
Q < 1indicates predominating evaporation of compounds in the sample. Q > 1 indicates the predominance of highly volatile oxidation products, whereas Q = 1 suggests an equilibrium between evaporation of original compounds of the sample and of volatile oxidation products. However, it may also indicate evaporation of original components both in argon and in air. With reference to Fig. 4-67 and considering the value of Q after 30 minutes test time, there is a sequence:
B200 < B80 < B65 < B25. Thermogravimetry, both isothermal and temperature-programmed, provides information about the thermal and oxidative behavior of bitumens and their colloid components. The results of the temperature-programmed method are valuable in the assessment of heavy residues with regard to their suitability for conversion processes. The results are not so useful in bitumen technology, since the effects in temperature-programmed thermogravimetry do not fall within the range of the manufacturing temperatures of bitumens. Isothermal thermogravimetry is superior in these circumstances although some experiments may be performed using other (cheaper) instruments. The consistency data (penetration and S.P. R&B) of bitumens cannot be simulated by thermogravimetry except to discriminate between distillation, semi-blown, an blown bitumens.
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
261
4.3.6.2 Reaction kinetics The coefficients of the Arrhenius equation, i.e. activation energy E and frequency (pre-exponential) factor A , of pyrolysis reactions may be determined using DSC, as exactly as possible for multicomponent systems when very small sample masses ( < 5 mg) are used. Determination of the reaction enthalpy is more difficult since the base line of the recorded signal does not run on equal levels before and after the reaction. Therefore it is not possible to determine the exact integration limits with sufficient certainty. The equation for the numerical calculation of the activation energy E involves the peak maximum temperature in linear and square terms. This is a source of errors. For graphic determination, log P(heating time) is plotted versus the inverse Kelvin temperature 1 OOO/ T (log P = f( 1 O O O / r ) ). The slope of the regression line is equivalent to the term E/R. Calculation of E requires multiplication by a factor of 8.319. As a consequence the means of E and A for distillation bitumens, computed from the individual data of Table 4-80, have relatively greater coefficients of variation ( fV = 8.27 % maximum) than the average values of E and A, computed using the means of the corresponding peak maximum temperatures ( fV = 1.01 %). These results had not been expected, considering the different origins of the samples, their different colloid compositions, and their different average molecular weights. Element analysis proved that the H/C ratios of the distillation bitumens, and of the blown bitumens and their colloid components, show very small variations (Tables 4-53 and 4-54). The peak maximum temperatures of the blown bitumens are not so uniform and therefore the calculation of means is not worth while. Some of the blown bitumens, their dispersion medium and their petroleum resins demonstrate peak maxima both in the distillation and in the pyrolysis range because of the content of low boiling flux oils. The activation energies computed for the distillation range are equal to the enthalpies of vaporization, as shown by experiments on model substances. The activation energies of pyrolysis are in the order of magnitude of the values for n-alkanes with a carbon chain length from C5 up to C,,, or of i-alkanes with carbon chain lengths > C,, (ascertained by other methods and cited in papers and compilations). The enthalpies of vaporization correspond to the literature values for n-alkanes with carbon chain lengths between C,, and C2*.The enthalpies of condensed aromatics such as naphthalene, anthracene, and phenanthrene are also found in this region. For bitumen technology, DSC measurements provide important evidence that the thermal stability of bitumen is not jeopardized at normal manufacturing temperatures, provided that oxygen (air) is excluded. Additional experiments were performed, to reduce the evaporation and favor the pyrolysis reactions, and the better to simulate the parameters of industrial thermal cracking. That was achieved by using methane as an inert hydrocarbon atmosphere at 10 bar pressure and 5 cm3/min gas flow rate. These experiments are quite meaningless with regard to bitumen technology, but bear some importance with regard to the behavior of heavy distillation residues and heavy crude oils in pyrolysis reactions such as visbreaking, thermal cracking,
262
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
and coking. In order to investigate the influence of chemical composition, the bitumens and their separated colloid components were pyrolysed. The observations made during the pyrolysis of distillation bitumens in 1 bar argon have proved to be generally true: that there is no significant difference between the means from individual calculated data of E and log A , and the average values of E and log A calculated using the means of the peak maximum temperatures. Nevertheless the coefficients of variation are much greater if the means are calculated from the individual data of E and log A. The experiments in 10 bar methane show that neither the origin nor the composition affect the results for the distillation bitumens and for their colloid components. No correlation was found for the Arrhenius coefficients with analytical data. The average values of these coefficients for the colloids components showed only small differences, but the conversions show considerable differences. The conversion may be correlated with the H/C ratio in a similar way to the correlation of the H/C ratio with the residues R600 and R800 in thermogravimetry (Fig. 4-49). Decreasing HIC ratios, i.e. increasing aromacity, lead to a decrease of the conversions (Fig. 4-80). In this case the data of the blown bitumens also fit the regression line very well. The blown bitumens do not exhibit peaks in the evaporation range when the system pressure is increased to 10 bar, except for the dispersion medium of the bitumens 85/40 and 85/25, which demonstrate only an evaporation loss. The Arrhenius coefficients of the blown bitumen showed greater differences than those of the distillation bitumens. In the plot of half life time, t,,2, versus the inverse Kelvin temperature, the distillation bitumens and their colloid components follow almost parallel lines, whereas the graphs for the blown bitumens and their colloid components diverge. The plot of t1,2 versus 1 OOO/T shows the residence time required to achieve a conversion of fifty percent, at a preset reaction temperature, or which temperature is required to achieve a preset conversion at a preset residence time. This information is valuable in thermal processing, for example in selection of the crack severity of the visbreaking process. The order of magnitude of the activation energy E and the frequency factor A from the experiments in 10 bar methane corresponds to the values of n-alkanes, n-C,,H,, to ~Z-C,~H,, (at normal pressure). No data for compariso 10 bar pressure can be found in the literature. According to the literature the activati nergy E and the frequency factor A tend asymptotically towards a final value with increasing carbon chain length. We have confirmed this in experiments on low density linear polyethylenes with an average chain length of 4300 to 27 740 C atoms. No differences of E or A could be verified. According to Zdonik [4-291, this final value is already reached with n-pentane or n-hexane, but this is not borne out by other authors. The plot of the data of the activation energy E of the n-alkanes versus the carbon numbers has an asymptotic slope above about C,6. During the pyrolysis experiments using DSC in 1 bar argon, vaporization of the n-alkanes up to a chain length of C, was found, whereas in the experiments in 10 bar methane a change from vaporization to pyrolysis occurred at a chain length of about C3,. Thus any comparison with the activation energies of the pyrolysis of bitumens can only be hypothetical. The
4.3 Investigations on bitumen
I
1.1
1.2
1.3 1.4 H / C
Fig. 4-80 Pyrolysis of Bitumens Conversion U versus Atomic Ratio H/C (Mean Values) z)r Distillation Bitumens 0 Blown Bitumens
1.5
1.6
263
1.7
264
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
value of 220-240 kJ/Mol for the activation energy of the bitumen components is in the order of that of long chain n-alkanes. The aliphatic C-C bond requires the lowest quantity of energy for splitting [4-301, its average free bonding energy being 297 kJ/Mol. Therefore one may deduce that this bond is cracked in each of the three components of bitumen. This assumption is supported by the very small and statistically insignificant differences of the Arrhenius coefficients of the colloid components. The content of aliphatic bonds decreases from the dispersion medium via the petroleum resins down to the asphaltenes, as shown by decreasing conversions. Determination of the start temperature of the cracking process using DSC gives very similar data for the series of the distillation bitumens, both in 1 bar argon and in 10 bar methane. This provides further support for the theory. The tolerances are very small and permit the calculation of means. Once again, the origin of the samples has no effect. The data from DSC and from TGA show such very small differences that they may be regarded as comparable, and confirm that no cracking processes occure below a temperature of approximately 400 "C. There is a considerable difference between the peak maximum temperatures Tmxof the reaction rate DTG in thermogravimetry, and the maximum temperatures of the peaks of the energy consumption in DSC. The mean of the DSC maximum in 1 bar argon (p = 10 K/min) exceeds the mean of Tmx from TGA by approximately 25 "C or 6 %. The suggestion that in DSC a energy flow takes place, and in TGA a mass transport, does not explain this difference. Determination of the onset temperature in DSC experiments in air give a more exact determination of the start temperature of the oxidation reaction than comparing the TGA curves in argon and in air. DSC also supplies exact evidence concerning the direction of heat flow (endo- or exothermic) and thus makes a clear distinction between evaporation and oxidation possible. TGA in air shows up to ten peak maxima of the DTG curve, whereas DSC in air shows only up to four distinct peak maxima. It is not possible to relate this to analytical data. Statistical evaluation of the onset temperatures gives coefficients of variation from k 5.5 % to 10 %, which indicates a systematic influence. The corresponding peak maximum temperatures of the first and the last oxidation peaks were found in DSC at lower values than in the DTG curves, since the oxidation experiments in the DSC were carried out at 7 bar air pressure. However the peak maximum temperatures in DSC for the different ranges show good uniformity. The coefficients of variation of the corresponding means range only from f0.3 % to ? 2.75 %, and may therefore be used to calculate the Arrhenius coefficients. ravimetry in air and the DSC oxidation experiments confirm the inferior ability of blown bitumens. DSC peak maximum temperatures, the activation energy of the first oxidation peak, and the temperatures of corresponding DTG maxima for blown bitumens are inferior compared to distillation bitumens. Knowledge of the kinetics of the oxidation reaction permits extrapolation of the resulting half life time to lower temperatures, producing information about the oxidation stability at manufacturing temperatures and the application of the bitumens. This only gives a rough estimate of the behavior on the actual road surface, since there are additional
4.4 Investigations on polymer modified bitumens (PMB)
265
effects of ultraviolet radiation. For the blowing process, parameters such as material temperature and residence time for the required degree of oxidation can be preselected, using the calculated kinetics for oxidation.
4.4 Investigations on polymer modified bitumens (PMW Bitumen can only be used industrially in a limited range of temperatures. The upper limit is marked by the softening point R&B (DIN 52 01 1, ASTM D 2398-68) and the lower limit by the breaking point according to FraaB (DIN 52 013, IP 80 153). This range, also called the plasticity span, is limited towards lower temperatures by increasing brittleness and towards higher temperatures by plastic deformation under load. To extend this plasticity span, mixtures have been tested, with nearly every polymer, but only a few of these became commercial products. Nowadays commercial mixtures of bitumens with uncured synthetic elastomers are produced, e.g. ethylene-propylene-diene terpolymers (EPDM), styrene-butadiene sequence copolymers (SBS), and ethylene-acrylic ester-acrylic acid terpolymers (AECM). Mixtures with some thermoplastics are also commercial products, e.g. polyethylene (PE), ethylene-propylenecopolymers (EPM), alpha-olefinic copolymers, atactic polypropylene (aPP), and ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers (EVA). For technical applications, PMB with a relatively low polymer content (3-5 %) is used for road construction; mixtures with a polymer content of 15-20 % are employed as roofing felts [4-22, 4-35, 4-36]. Characterizationof such mixtures using thermoanalytical methods is presented in chapter 4.4, using the examples of four commercial PMBs and their basic bitumens.
4.4.1 Description and characterization of the samples The samples in this investigation are given in Table 4-109: Table 4-109: Samples. Sample No.
Type
1 2 3 4
Bitumen B80/1 PMB/1 = B80/1 Bitumen B80/2 PMB/2 = B80/2
+ 8 % EPM
+ approx. 3 % SBS
266
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Sample No.
5Pe Bitumen B200/3 PMB/3 = B200/3 + EPDM Bitumen B80/4 PMB/4 = B80/4 + SBR cured
The bitumens and the PMB are products from German refineries. PMB/l, PMB/2, and PMB /3 are commercial products, whereas PMB/4 is an experimental product. The consistency data of the bitumens and the PMB are given in Table 4-110: Table 4-110: Consistency data of bitumen and PMB. Substance B80/1 PMB/l B80/2 PMB /2 B200/3 PMB /3 B80/4 PMB 14
Pen (0.1 mm)
SP R&B ("C)
BP ("C)
P1.Sp. ("C)
63.6 54 85.5 76.6 160.2 62.6 80.4 72.7
50.6 57.4 47.4 52.9 40.4 54.3 48.4 52.3
-16 -19 -14 -14 -16 -15 -13 -16
66.6 76.4 62.4 66.9 56.4 69.3 61.4 68.3
= needle penetration = softening point ring & ball
Pen (0.1 mm) SP R&B ("C) BP (oc)o P1.Sp. ( C )
= breaking point according to FraaS = plasticity span (SP R&B minus BP)
The data of the element analysis are listed in Table 4-1 11. Nitrogen content is not declared since the concentrations are of an order of magnitude within the limits of error of the analytical method. The content of oxygen is analysed directly to avoid the accumulating errors of calculation by differences. Table 4-111: Element analysis of the virgin samples (wt%). Sample
C
H
S
0
B80/1 PMB/1 B80/2 PMB/2 B200/3 PMB /3 B80/4 PMB 14
84.81 84.90 84.81 84.70 84.98 85.52 83.30 83.22
10.46 10.79 10.25 10.23 10.50 10.31 10.09 10.05
4.46 4.25 4.47 4.18 4.40 3.28 6.60 6.69
0.60 0.78 0.83 0.82 0.60 0.91 0.60 0.50
4.4 Investigations on polymer modified bitumens (PMB)
267
The samples were aged using the rotating flask test (DIN 52 017 similar to ASTM D 2872-85) both in argon and in air. The weight control did not show any change of weight, since all the differences were within experimental error. Notwithstanding the absence of any weight changes, considerable alterations to the consistency data occured, both to the penetration and to the softening point. The alterations of the breaking points were also within the experimental error. For ease of comparability, the alterations to the consistency data, both of the penetration and of the softening point, are reduced to their relative values (related to the start value of each) in Fig. 4-81 and 4-82. Element analysis of the samples after the rotation aging in air shows only small alterations in the composition. The assumption that alterations in the consistency data are due to oxygen uptake during oxidation is not justified. Decreases in the concentrations of oxygen as well as increases were observed. The absolute alterations of oxygen concentration are certainly small but related to the initial concentrations, they are considerable and exceed the tolerances of the analytical method (Table 4-1 12):
Penetration Decrease ( $ 1 40 35 30
25 20
15 10
5 0
B€JO/l
PmB/i 3 8 0 / 2 PmB/2 3200/3 PmW3 B80/4 PmB/4
Air
Argon
Fig. 4-81 Aging in the Rotating Flask of Bitumen and PMB (DIN 52 017). Relative Change in Needle Penetration (DIN 52 010)
268
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Softening Point (Ring & B a l l )
Increase ( % I 20
16 14 12 10 8 6
4
2 0
BBO/i
PmB/f
B 8 0 / 2 PmB/2 B200/3 PmB/3 B80/4 PmB/4 Air
Argon
Fig. 4-82 Aging in the Rotating Flask of Bitumen and PMB (DIN 52 017) Relative Change in Softening Point Ring & Ball (DIN 52 01 1) Table 4-112. Oxygen concentration before and after the rotation aging in air.
Sample B80/1 PMB/l B80/2 PMB /2 B200/3 PMB/3 B80/4 PMB 14
Oxygen concentration (%) unaged aged 0.6 0.78 0.83 0.82 0.60 0.91 0.60 0.50
0.54 0.68 0.80 0.84 0.64 1.14 0.55 0.59
Alteration (%) absolute relative
-0.06 -0.10 -0.03 +0.04 +0.04 +0.23 -0.05 +0.09
-10 -12 - 3.6 + 2.5 + 6 +25 - 8.3 +18
4.4 Investigations on polymer modified bitumens (PMB)
269
4.4.2 Thermogravimetry 4.4.2.1 Dynamic (temperature-programmed) thermogravimetry The Stanton-Redcroft TG 750 thermobalance was used, applying the standard parameters: heating rate p= 10 K/min and a gas flow rate of 25 cm3/min. The TGA curves already known for bitumens were obtained. The TGA curves of B80/1 and PMB/1 are congruent up to approximately 475 "C. There is only a difference in the coking behavior (Fig. 4-83). Comparison between B200/3 and PMB/3 reveals differences: the curve of PMB/3 is shifted towards lower temperatures (Fig. 4-84). This due to the
Fig. 4-83 Thermogravimetry of Bitumen and PMB (TG 750) Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Bitumen B80/1 Curve2: PMB/1
270
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Fig. 4-84 Thermogravimetry of Bitumen and PMB (TG 750) Heating Rate p: 10 Klmin Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Bitumen B200/3 Curve2: PMBl3
presence of a furfural extract, which had been used to swell the polymer, prior to mixing with bitumen. The curves of the pairs: B80/2 and PMB/2, and B80/4 and PMB/4, are completely congruent in the experiments in argon. During the experiments in air the pair B200/3 and PMB/3 shows divergence of the curves at low temperatures (Fig. 4-85). The low values of T1 % and T5 % for PMB/3 indicate loss by evaporation, prior to the start of the oxidation at approximately 330 "C. The other three pairs also have congruent curves in the oxidation experiments. The index numbers of the experiments in argon are listed in Table 4-113, those of the experiments in air in Table 4-1 14. The residues at 600 "C and 800 "C of the experiments in air consist of inorganic material (ash). The experiments in argon demonstrate only one DTG peak maximum for the
bitumens (PMB)
Fig. 4-85 Thermogravimetry of Bitumen and PMB (TG 750) Heating Rate p : 10 Klmin Atmosphere: Air 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Bitumen B200/3 Curve2: PMB/3
27 1
B
P D
c1
-n$ r.
B 2 @€
a
.'L Yi
.'Y -i
u '3
4
10'6 1.51 L'91
1.91
I'PI L81 S'LE 0'91 L'IE
O'SI S'IZ
16P -
0'8I
Z.PI -
OP'8
O'SI
O'EE O'EI
ElP 89P
8Z'S 90'1 L6'9 8'91 L'LI
6SP 5.51
L'PI
5' I
I'Z
z.1
-
-
If0 -
-
-
P'8 €'I
-
001
9'0 6'0
002
2'8 8'6 0' I
I8'0I
O'EI
P8'9
S'OZ
OOE
19P 899
6'1 I
OOP
EP'6
009
26'6
tl
008
0 LP 180
ma
E9P -J
P / 8Md P/088 E / 8Nd 6 I ooz 8 Z I tIMd ZlO88 1 I 8Nd
SIZ
062
1zz
OSE
99z
9LZ
8 LZ
882
POZ 06Z
1/088
6PE
IS€
IOE
amqsqng
9LZ
09E
% IJ.
ZEE
% SL
4.4 Investigations on polymer modified bitumens (PMB)
273
Table 4-114: TGA in air (25 cm3/min) (p= 10 Klmin) Substancl T1 To
T5 %
AG
100
200
R
300
- -
400 ~
600
__
B80/1
272
316
-
3.2
22.3
0
PMB I 1
261
316
-
3.3
22.0
0
B8012
207
256
0.7
13.6
34.0
0
PMB 1 2
195
247
1.0
14.6
34.7
0.8
B 200 1 3
267
307
-
4.0
30.5
0
PMB 1 3
210
248
0.6
18.7
39.0
0
DTG 800
0.61 8.46 3.12 4.00 6.00 5.82 7.90 4.90 7.84 1.04 5.09 6.68 6.74 12.87 9.38 8.64 2.22 3.85 2.76 5.05 6.06 9.31 2.51 6.27 3.17 6.13 7.38 6.64 11.55 1.69 10.81 2.19 5.00 5.31 6.06 5.56 5.31 3.75 7.44 3.08 2.94 3.56 3.49 4.93 4.79 6.84
308 370 392 403 410 416 434 456 511 308 370 407 412 428 477 510 302 347 367 410 438 501 298 353 383 422 430 442 495 310 362 382 398 400 414 419 433 459 528 303 333 388 404 439 456 538
274
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-114 continued: TGA in air (25 cm3/min) Substance T1 %
(p= 10 K/min) DTG
R
AG
100
200
300
400
600
800
__
B80/4
255
-
6.0
29.0
0
-
PMB / 4
243
0.2
6.2
28.9
1.6
1.2
- __ __
__
1.84 3.15 3.28 12.52 7.21 5.24 5.97 6.69 14.88 1.89 5.40 7.81 8.14 3.95 5.99 5.21 7.36
310 365 373 389 399 418 424 438 528 311 360 380 395 423 446 456 521
samples. The maximum appears above 400 "C in the craclung region every time. The experiments in air show multiple DTG peaks, of which the first may indicate losses due to evaporation, as well as losses due to oxidation. For the DTG peak maximum temperatures of the experiments in argon a mean X = 470.4 "C and a coefficient of variation V = 2.16 % can be calculated. The experiments in air give different numbers of peaks in the eight samples, but six of the peaks appear at the same temperature level for each of the samples (Table 4-115):
*
Table 4-115: Means of the DTG maximum temperatures of the experiments in air.
Peak No.
x ("C)
f V (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6
306.7 365.6 403.8 436.4 456.8 518.6
1.49 1.73 1.42 1.32 1.50 2.91
A distillable fraction Am00 from 13- 19 % corresponds to the usual behavior of distillation bitumens. The high evaporation losses of the bitumen B80/2 and its PMB/2 are extraordinary whereas the high evaporation loss of the PMB/3 may be explained by the addition of furfural extract, to swell the polymer prior to mixing. The start of the oxidation reaction can be defined either by the first DTG peak maximum or by comparing the TGA curves in argon and in air. In the latter case, lower temperature
4.4 Investigations on polymer mod$ed bitumens (PMB)
275
data will be found. The weight loss of the samples generally starts at temperatures above 250 "C both in argon and in air. The TI % and T5 % values of the experiments in air are lower than those of the experiments in argon. The samples B80/2 and PMB/2 demonstrate a superimposition of evaporation and oxidation effects in the first stage. The flattening of the TGA curves of the experiments in air at temperatures between 350 and 370 "C indicates the formation of low-volatile oxidation products. An increase of the weight as a consequence of the resorption of oxygen in this range of temperatures (low temperature oxidation LTO) has only been observed with polymers which have many double bonds in the carbon chain (see chapter 4.4.5). Thermogravimetry did not show that addition of polymers had any stabilizing effect on the oxidation of bitumens.
4.4.2.2 Isothermal gravimetry Since no weight losses were found during rotation aging according to DIN 52 017, we tried to find the start temperatures of weight loss by using isothermal gravimetry. The samples were heated, applying a fast heating rate of p = 100 K/min, up to a preselected isothermal temperature and this was maintained for 150 minutes. The experiments were carried out both in argon and in air with a gas flow rate of 25 cm3/min. The sample weight was 5 to 8 mg. Therefore the conditions were similar to those of a thin-layer vacuum distillation [3-41 as described above. The essential difference compared to rotation aging, consists in the thickness of the material layers and in the quantity of gas per unit sample weight during the test time: Rotation aging:
gas flow rate sample weight test time calculated gas flow
500 cm3/min 100 g 150 minutes 0.75 cm3/l mg sample
Thermogravimetry:
gas flow rate sample weight test time calculated gas flow
- 6 mg
25 cm3/min
150 minutes 625 cm3/l mg sample
Experiments were carried out at isothermal temperatures of 165 "C (equivalent to the test temperature according DIN 52 017), 200 "C, and 250 "C. Disregarding the thickness of the material layers, the gas flow per unit weight in the thermobalance is many times that in the rotating flask. Nevertheless relatively small losses of weight are observed at 165 "C in argon. Five samples demonstrate losses of only up to 1 % (B80/1, PMB/1, B200/3, B80/4, PMB/4), whereas three samples demonstrate weight losses between 2 % and 4 % (B80/2, PMB/2, PMB/3). These samples also show weight losses between only 2 % and 4 % in air. At 200 "C the weight losses increase to noticeable values (Fig. 4-86 and 4-87). At 250 "C a distinct differentiation of the products occurs (Fig. 4-88 and 4-89).
276
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
10
9 8
7 6
5 4
3 2
1
Fig. 4-86 Isothermal Thermogravimetry at 200 "C (TG 750) Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min Curve 2: PMB/1 Curve 1: Bitumen B80/1 Curve 3: Bitumen B80/2 Curve 4: PMB/2 Curve 5 : Bitumen B200/3 Curve 6: PMB/3 Curve 7: Bitumen B80/4 Curve 8: PMB/4
4.4 Investigations on polymer modified bitumens (PMB)
''If
Weight Loss ( I )
-
d
-I
15
30
45
60
75
.-. B
90
i
105
i
120 -Time
Fig. 4-87 Isothermal Thennogravimetry Atmosphere: Air 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Bitumen B80/1 Curve 3: Bitumen B80/2 Curve 5: Bitumen B200/3 Curve 7: Bitumen B&0/4
at 200 "C (TG 750)
Curve 2: Curve 4: Curve 6: Curve 8:
PMB/1 PMB/2 PMB/3 PMB/4
i
135
i
150 (min)
277
278
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Fig. 4-88 Isothermal Thermogravimetry at 250 "C (TG 750) Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min Curve 2: PMBI1 Curve 1: Bitumen B80/1 Curve 4: PMBI2 Curve 3: Bitumen B80/2 Curve 5: Bitumen B200/3 Curve 6: PMBl3 Curve 8: PMBI4 Curve 7: Bitumen B80/4
4.4 Investigations on polymer modified bitumens (PMB)
25
279
t
jt
Weight LOSS ( 2 )
20.
I
15
30
I
I
1
45
60
75
I
1
90
105
120
I
135
I
150
Fig. 4-89 Isothermal Thermogravimetry at 250 "C Atmosphere: Air 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Bitumen B80/1 Curve 2: PMB/1 Curve 3: Bitumen B80/2 Curve 4: PMB/2 Curve 5: Bitumen B200/3 Curve 6: PMB/3 Curve 7: Bitumen B80/4 Curve 8: PMB/4
The quotient Q =
loss in air
loss in argon provides evidence as to whether the weight loss is predominantly due to the evaporation of non-oxidized portions of the sample, Q < 1.O, or is mainly a consequenceof the formation of highly volatile oxidation products, Q > 1.0. The plot of the loss quotient Q against the test time is shown in Fig. 4-90 to 4-92.
280
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
*
Loss i n Argon
1.0.
--
A- -L-o-co-0--3 A3-- + T-. . d; F--'-9-* -p- ~4- a--B-0- -H 2-4-
*
b),
YV-
' + "*\
"'":
*
-96
*
3-
.7
' I ' P
'9'
6
I
I
-.
*2 I
L
4.4 Investigations on polymer modified bitumens (PMB)
Loss i n Argon
-4-.
Fig. 4-91 Quotient of Loss Q of the Isothermal Thermogravimetry at 200 "C Curve 2: PMBI1 Curve 1: Bitumen B80/1 Curve 4: PMBl2 Curve 3: Bitumen B80/2 Curve 6: PMBl3 Curve 5: Bitumen B200/3 Curve 7: Bitumen B80/4 Curve 8: PMBl4
-0 6
28 1
282
4 Thennoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Time
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
120
135
(mi2 150
Fig. 4-92 Quotient of Loss Q of the Isothermal Thermogravimetry at 250 "C Curve 2: PMB/1 Curve 1: Bitumen B80/1 Curve 4: PMB/2 Curve 3: Bitumen B80/2 Curve 5: Bitumen B200/3 Curve 6: PMB/3 Curve 8: PMBI4 Curve 7: Bitumen B80/4
The three samples which experience weight loss at 165 "C (Q < 1)show that this loss is due to evaporation of non-oxidized parts of the sample (Fig. 4-90). At 200 "C there is no such uniformity (Fig. 4-91). For samples B80/1 and PMB/2 Q is permanently > 1.0, i.e. their considerable losses are due to volatile oxidation products. The values for the PMB/4 are still higher: t (min)
Q
75 90 105 135 150
7.00 4.50 3.33 2.00 1.83
4.4 Investigations on polymer modified bitumens (PMB)
283
At 200 "C the quotient Q of PMB/l, B80/2, B200/3, and B80/4 incrcases with increasing test times, but PMB/1 only exceeds Q = 1.0 after 90 minutes test time. At 250°C only samples PMB/I and B200/3 exceed Q = 1.0, whereas all the other samples have values of Q nearly equal to one (PMB/4) or less than 1.0 (B80/1, B80/2, PMB/3 F, PMB/4, B80/4). (Fig. 4-92).
4.4.3 Reaction kinetics using DSC Arrhenius' equation gives the best description of the dependence of the reaction rate upon the temperature, for pyrolysis (cracking) and oxidation reactions. It is possible to extrapolate the reaction rate constant and the half life time to higher or lower temperatures. Therefore the coefficients of the Arrhenius equation, (activation energy E and the frequency (pre-exponential) factor A) were determined using the method according to ASTM E
Sample B80 / 1 PMB 1 1 B8012 PMB / 2 Peak 1 Peak 2 B 200 I 3 PMB 1 3 Peak 1 Peak 2 B8014 PMB 1 4
Temperature range ("C)
E (kJ1Mol)
log A (mid)
Coke residue
450-490 440-480 440-475 310-370 430-480 440-475 310-370 435-470 430-475 440-475
273.8 239.5 259.3 78.0 268.5 258.7 98.0 258.1 219.7 266.6
19.249 16.942 18.548 6.447 19.177 18.433 8.072 18.404 15.641 18.970
15.75 14.75 15.70
(%I
-
14.04 12.75 -
12.95 15.19 15.42
Table 4-117: DSC oxidation in 7 bar air Temperature range ("C)
Peak 1 275-335
Peak 2 395-455
Peak 3 4 15-480
E (kJ/Mol) B80/1 PMB I 1 B80/2 PMEil2 B 200 1 3 PMB 1 3 B8014 PMB 1 4
102.8
9.134
111.2
10.001
114.4 102.2
8.536 10.234 8.386 9.116
183.8 103.8 187.2 175.1
13.310 7.747 13.481 12.453
157.7
11.913
196.6
14.382
-
-
-
Peak 4 460-540
log A (min-l)
148.6 139.0 125.6 209.0 222.3 191.5 193.6 131.3
10.143 9.885 8.681 14.850 16.088 13.757 13.860 9.050
163.8 187.8 146.2 175.8 134.0 121.5 138.6 123.5
10.594 12.659 9.427 11.871 8.625 7.946 9.347 7.773
284
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
698-79. Four different heating rates @ = 5, 10, 20, and 50K/min) were applied. The experiments were carried out in argon at 1 bar pressure and in air at 7 bar with a gas flow rate of 5 cm3/min each, using a sample weight between 1.5 and 4.0 mg. The results of the pyrolysis and oxidation experiments are listed in Tables 4-1 16 and 4-1 17. The temperature range includes the values of the reaction maximum temperatures for each of the four heating rates. The coke residue of the pyrolysis reaction was determined after the reaction and after cooling down to room temperature. The results in Table 4-116 show that pyrolysis reactions occur in temperature ranges which are normal for bitumens. The activation energies and the frequency factors are also as expected. The samples PMB/2 and the PMB/3 each have an additional peak, which must be associated with a distillation event, as indicated by its temperature and its activation energy. The activation energy equals the enthalpy of vaporization. The peak of PMB/3 derives from the content of a furfural extract, which was added to swell the polymer. The same assumption may be made for PMB/2, since there is no corresponding peak in the DSC experiment on bitumen B80/2, despite a high evaporation loss during thermogravimetry in argon (AG300 = 9.8 wt%, AG400 = 33.0 wt%). Polymer modification of bitumen B80/1 results in a decrease of the activation energy of PMB/1. The activation energies of PMB/2 and PMB/4 are increased relative to the basic bitumens, whereas the activation energy of PMB/3 is equal to that of bitumen B200/3. This must be an accident, since the production of PMB/3 includes blowing of the mixture of bitumen, extract, and polymer. But for no one product activation energy of the pyrolysis reaction fa11 so low that difficulties in manufacturing of the PMB would be incurred. The half life times of PMB/l and PMB/3 are reduced slightly, and those of PMB/2 and PMBI4 increased slightly, relative to the basic bitumens. DSC oxidation in 7 bar air produce three or four very easily evaluable peaks, which may be related to the three reaction steps: low temperature oxidation LTO (peak 1); fuel deposition (peak 2 and sometimes peak 3); and fuel combustion (last peak). The first peak for bitumen and for PMB appears at temperatures of 275-335 "C depending on the heating rate. The Arrhenius coefficients of PMB/1 and PMB/2 are less than for the basic bitumens, whereas the coefficients of PMB/3 and PMB/4 are higher. The second peak is found between 395 "C and 455 "C and the third peak (if there is an additional peak in the region of fuel deposition) between 425 "C and 480 "C. We could not determine how much overlap there was between the endothermal pyrolysis reaction and the exothermal oxidation, which was due to the combustion of the products from the preceding cracking, although both peaks are of an exothermal nature. The last peak is situated between 460 "C and 540 "C and represents the combustion of the coke which was formed by pyrolysis in the preceding reaction region. The activation energy of the last reaction often corresponds to the activation energy of elemental carbon (activated charcoal E = 154 kJ/Mol). The value of the first oxidation peak is relevant to practical applications since this peak marks the start of oxidation. In the graph of log t1,2 versus 1 000/T, the lines for the bitumen and the corresponding PMB each have a point of intersection, due to the different slopes of the lines, which are defined by the activation energy. This point of intersection for the first oxidation peak appears at nearly identical temperatures for each pair, except B80/ 1-PMB 11
4.4 Invsstigations on polymer modified bitumens (PMB)
Pair B80/1-PMB/1 BS0/2-PMB/2 B200/3-PMB/3 BSOI4-PMB 14
285
Point of intersection ("C) 150 270 250 260
The half life times of bitumen B80/1 and B80/2 are higher than those of the corresponding PMB/I and PMB/2 at temperatures below the point of intersection. The pairs B200/3-PMB/3 and B80/4-PMB/4 demonstrate an inverse behavior. The software for the computation of the Arrhenius coefficients only provides values of the reaction enthalpy incidentally. This enthalpy is always dependent on the initial weight, so the results for the oxidation experiment are not valid. The data for the pyrolysis experiments are listed in table 4- 118: Table 4-118: Enthalpy of pyrolysis. Sample B80/1 PMB/1 B80/2 PMB/2 Peak 1 Peak 2 B200/3 PMB/3 Peak 1 Peak 2 B80/4 PMB 14
Enthalpy (kJ/Mol) 365.4 244.9 232.9 24.4 123.9 319.9 50.5 195.5 152.2 147.3
The low values of peak 1 of PMB/2 and PMB/3 are evident and cannot be associated with a pyrolysis reaction.
4.4.4 Low temperature behavior of PMB using DSC Changes in the crystalline phase, such as melting, crystallization, or glass transitions of polymers and bitumens may be recognized using low temperature DSC. The influences of the polymer additive on the glass transition temperature of bitumen, and the reciprocal influence of the components of bitumens on the crystalline structure of the polymers, may be investigated if the polymer concentration is sufficient. This minimum polymer concentration should be approximately 3 wt%. Fig. 4-93 shows the behavior of a low molecular high density polyethylene HD-PE (M, = 5.900) during heating and cooling. In the heating curve a slight endothermal signal is recognized at 92 'C, which unquestionably represents a
286
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
0
Cooling
c 5/
E " L
: LL
0
0-
4J
B
I \
-5
-
\
I
\
-------zJ;04'C I
4.4 Investigations on polymer modified bitumens (PMB)
287
memory effect from processing, since this signal is never found in a second heating run of the same sample. At 111 "C the crystalline fraction of the sample (approx. 43 %) melts. Formation of the crystallites is shifted down to 103 "C due to the heating-cooling rate p= 5 K/min, which is quite high for such effects. Fig. 4-94 shows a bitumen B200 which has a glass transition at -23 "C (heating-cooling rate p= 5 K/min). The mixture of this bitumen with 5 wt% HD-PE is shown in Fig. 4-95. The oily phase of the bitumen (the maltenes) acts as a plasticizer for HD-PE and decreases the melting temperature of its crystalline phase to 98 "C. Both the melting and the crystallization peaks became considerably flatter and broader. The glass transition temperature of the bitumen is no longer evident.
2-
2
" 3
2u.
0-
+I
B -2-
-4 -
\
Heating
\______
'\
\
9 a . 1 3 ~
\ -6
-so
I
-40
-20
D
25
.
2
4n
.
I
60
.
I
eo
.
I
ion
.
1 0
Fig. 4-95 DSC HeatingKooling Curve of a Compound Bitumen B200 (95 wt %) + HD-PE (5 wt %) Heating/Cooling Rate p : 5 K/min
4.4.5 Aging properties of polymers for the modification of bitumen Polymers which are used in the modification of bitumen must posses sufficient compatibility, and high thermal stability; they will then be able to resist the high temperatures during the mixing process in the asphalt mixing plant, and during transport, from the
288
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
mixing plant to the road surface or to a substrate in the production of roofing felts. High oxidation stability, at high temperatures during manufacturing, and at lower temperatures during application, is required. The assumption that an easily oxidizable polymer will protect the bitumen against oxidation is not corroborated by the results of the investigations on bitumen and PMB (chapter 4.4). Oxidation consists of chain reactions of radicals, which attack the bitumen, as well as the polymers and other organic substances [4-371. Peroxide and hydroperoxide radicals formed elsewhere act as chain propagators, and start the oxidation of the bitumen [4-381. Therefore the polymers must be sufficiently stable to oxidation either based on their chemical constitution or on corresponding stabilizer content. Both the pyrolysis and the oxidation stability of six commercial polymers were investigated [4-391. The abbreviations for these polymers and their average molecular weights (number average Mn) are listed in Table 4-119. Table 4-119: Polymers under investigation Sample
Substance
1
Low molecular weight high density polyethylene Ethylene-propylene copolymer Ethylene-prop ylene-norbornene sequence terpolymer Styrene-butadiene radial block copolymer Styrene-ethylene-butene sequence terpolymer Low molecular weight polybutadiene (liquid)
2 3 4
5
6
Abbrevation
M"
HD-PE EPM
5.000 8.000
EPDM
SBS
233.300
SEBS
54.200
BR
3.000
A preliminary review of the thermal and thermooxidative behavior is provided by temperture-programmed thermogravimetry both in argon and in air. The index numbers T1 % and T5 % represent the weight loss due to evaporation of volatile (low molecular) fractions in argon, and the weight loss due to evaporation of volatile oxidation products in air (Table 4-120): Generally the experiments in argon start with a weight loss due to the evaporation of volatile parts. Then follows a more or less rapid depolymerization or pyrolysis of the samples as shown above for polybutadiene (BR) in Fig. 3-24 and for HD-PE in Fig. 3-25. Above 500 "C the polymers under investigation volatilize quantitatively. The DTG curves each show one maximum in the temperature range from 350 "C (evaporation of BR) to 460 "C (pyrolysis). This may indicate that in the absence of air thermal degradation does not occur at customary processing temperatures. TGA in air provides different results. All the saturated hydrocarbons behave in the same way as in argon, at least at lower temperatures. However, compounds which contain reactive double bonds, such as EPDM, SBS, and BR, show an increase of the sample weight at relatively low temperatures, attaining a maximum for the oxidation of BR as
4.4 Investigations on polymer modified bitumens (PMB)
289
Table 4-120: Start temperature of weight loss in thermogravimetry ("C). Sample No.
Substance
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
HD-PE EPM EPDM SBS SEBS BR* Bitumen B80
*
T1 %
T5 %
T1 %
in argon
378 266 239 304 292 310 204-301
T5 % in air
430 352 354 343 335 373 276-360
244 245 237 302 259 333 207-272
318 280 305 345 28 1 423 256-3 16
the oxidation of BR starts at 117 "C with an increase of the sample weight due to resorption of oxygen
shown in Fig. 3-24. This increase of the sample weight is less than that theoretically predicted by the double bond content. It is due to the resorption of oxygen and the formation of non-volatile oxygen compounds, and can be measured clearly in the unsaturated polymers mentioned above. TGA curves of the other polymers, which only contain saturated carbon chains, do not give any information concerning the possible resorption of oxygen. Above the temperature range 240-330 "C all the polymers suffer a continous weight loss, until at approximately 550 "C they have undergone quantitative combustion. The DTG curves of the experiments in air exhibit up to ten satisfactory oxidation peaks. Those which represent the increase of the sample weight of the unsaturated polymers appear from 180 "C to 190 OC, indicating that a more or less severe oxidation of the polymers would take place at the temperatures customary in the asphalt mixing plants. The dependence of changes with test time at lower temperatures has been examined using isothermal gravimetry. In order to reach the test temperatures as rapidly as possible, a heating rate /3 = 100 K/min was used. The samples remained at the preselected isothermal temperature for 150 minutes. The standard gas flow rate of 25 cm3/minwas used for both argon and air. In the experiment in argon, none of the samples suffered any weight loss, at 165 "C or 200 "C test temperature, except BR and EPM. The weight loss at 165 "C was 0.2 % for EPM and 0.3 % for BR, whereas the loss at 200 "C was 1.5 % for EPM and 2.3 % for BR, each after 150 minutes test time. Isothermal aging in air presents a different picture (Table 4-121). EPM is subject to an unexpectedly high weight loss, both at 165 "C (-10.7 %) and 200 "C (-32.1 %). The plot of weight loss against test time showed that weight loss was not even complete after 150 minutes. The behavior of BR is similar; it firstly undergoes a small increase of the sample weight, but has lost 2.0 % after 150 minutes at 165 "C test temperature and 6.5 % at 200 O C , without reaching equilibrium. At 165 "C EPDM starts with an increase of the sample weight, which reaches a maximum after 15 minutes test time. After 150 minutes the weight loss amounts to only 2.3 % but equilibrium has, again, not been reached. At 200 "C weight is lost from the beginning. After 150 minutes the weight loss amounts to 10.1 % with no sign that this is the final stage. SBS, SEBS, and HD-PE were most stable in these experiments. These results
290
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-121: Isothermal gravimetry in air. Alteration of weight (%) Time
HD-PE
EPM
EPDM
SBS
Temperature: 165 "C
5 10 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150
0
0
0 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.2 -0.2
0 -0.9 -1.9 -3.2 -4.4 -5.6 -6.9 -8.1 -9.4 -10.7
I
+0.2 +0.8 +0.9 +0.8 +0.5 +o.1 -0.2 -0.8 -1.1 -1.4 -1.9 -2.3
+1.1 +1.4 +1.8 +2.2 +2.2 +2.2 +2.3 +2.4 +2.4 +2.4 +2.4 +2.4
SEBS
BR
B 80
9
+0.5
i;;
0
0 -0.1 -0.1 -0.2 -0.2 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3
-0.1 -0.3 -0.6 -0.9 -1.3 -1.5 -1.7 -2.0
0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4
1
+0.5
Temperature: 200 "C
5 10 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150
0 -0.1 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 -0.5 -0.7
-0.2 -1.7 -3.2 -7.8 -11.9 -14.8 -18.7 -21.7 -24.5 -27.0 -29.4 -32.1
0 -0.6 -1.1 -2.3 -3.4 -4.7 -5.7 -6.7 -7.8 -8.6 -9.4 -10.1
+1.1 +1.1 +1.1 +0.9 +0.6 +0.2 0 0 -0.3 -0.7 -1.0 -1.1
0 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 -0.5 -0.7
1::: +0.7 0 -1.6 -2.3 -3.1 -3.9 -4.8 -5.6 -6.5
-0.6 -0.7 -0.7 -0.9 -1.0 -1.1 -1.3 -1.6 -1.9 -2.1 -2.6 -2.8
indicate that EPDM and BR exhibit quite insufficient stabilization, and that EPM shows a complete absence of any oxidation-stabilizer content. The kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions were investigated according to ASTM E 698-79, applying the standard experimentalconditions.The DSC plot of the pyrolysis of EPDM (heating rate p= 5 K/min) is given as an example in Fig. 4-96. For each of the polymers only one peak maximum of the endothermal heat flow in the pyrolysis experiments in argon was confirmed, and this was between 430 "C and 490 OC, depending on the heating rate. Only SBS has an additional exothermic peak maximum between 360 "C and 390 'C, which indicates that thermal crosslinking took place prior to the pyrolysis (Fig. 497). The plot of log tl,2versus 1 000/T shows that all of the polymers have thermal stability exceeding the temperatures customary for processing bitumen or polymers. For example, the extrapolated half life time at 300 "C exceeds a value of lo3 minutes for all of the polymers tested.
4.4 Investigations on polymer modified bitumens (PMB)
0-
2"
-2-
-*
U. 0
P
I
-4-
-5
-8
-
1
0
1on
zoo
I
300 Tempordturo C°C)
Fig. 4-96 DSC Pyrolysis of EPDM Heating Rate p: 5 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 5 cm3/min
400
500
6 1
291
292
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products 4
4
-6 0
100
200
Temperature 300 (DC)
400
500
0
Fig. 4-97 DSC Pyrolysis of SBS Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 5 cm3/min
DSC in air give three to five maxima of exothermal energy flow, as Fig. 4-98 shows for the example of SBS (heating rate p = 10 K/min). The first peak at approximately I88 "C represents the low temperature oxidation, LTO, where oxygen-containing, low-volatile products are produced, which are responsible for the increase of the sample weight in thermogravimetry. The first maximum of the DSC curve for this sample was found at 189 "C. The second peak at 363 "C and the third peak at 447 "C are associated with the region of fuel deposition. The coke residue which was formed in this region of reaction will subsequently be combusted at temperatures around 490 "C (last peak). The coefficients of the Arrhenius equation (activation energy E and frequency factor A ) may be computed for each step of the reaction (Table 4-122). The LTO region is of practical relevance for oxidation effects in mixing and manufacturing processes, and for long-term oxidation stability, since any oxidation reaction would start there. Taking the half life time t1,2as a criterion for oxidation stability, then the plot of log tlizversus 1 OOO/T (Fig. 4-99) may be interpreted as follows:
4.4 Investigations on polymer modified bitumens (PMB) I20
100-
ao-
60-
363.50-C
lea. 550c
40 -
20-
0-
-20 0
Fig.
100
I
200
300
8
400
I
500
600
293
294
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
4.4 Investigations on polymer mod& !d bitumens (PMB)
250
20
1,50
Fig. 4-99 Low Temperature Oxidation of Polymers (First DSC Peak) Half Life Time t,,2 versus Temperature Line 1: HD-PE Line 4: SBS Line 5: SEBS Line 2: EPM Line 6: BR Line 3: EPDM Line 7: Bitumen B80 Line 4: EPDM
295
296
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
The half life time at 200 "C for EPM, EPDM, SBS, and BR is less than one minute. For HD-PE and SEBS the half life times range from eight to twenty minutes. Thus, any of these polymers might be oxidized to some extent during the production of asphalt (bitumen/ mineral) mixtures or roofing felts. Extrapolation to lower temperatures shows that EPM and BR still have low oxidation stability, while the other polymers are sufficiently stable, but they all have lower LTO stability than bitumen. During the oxidation process long-life radicals are formed, which are mesomeiically stabilized. These radicals can induce the oxidation of bitumen binder in the road surface or roofing felt, even at low temperatures under the influence of UV radiation. Moreover temperatures up to 60 "C or 80 "C may be reached at the surfaces of roads or roofing felts as a result of the IR radiation in sunlight. However, the energetic UV rays can only penetrate the surface for a few micrometers due to the dark color of the bitumen. The oxidation stability of the polymers is inferior to that of the bitumen. Most of the polymers which are used in the plastics industries are more or less adequately stabilized against oxidative attacks by the manufacturer. Polymers with reactive double bonds, which are for the most part used in the rubber industry, should be protected against oxidation by those antioxidants which are in common use in that industry. Easily oxidizable polymers cannot protect bitumen against oxidative attacks. The radicals which form during the oxidation of the polymers, may also start chain reactions in the bitumen. Effective protection against oxidation may only be achieved using radical scavengers or suitable antioxidants, which terminate the radical chain reaction or deactivate the free radical starters.
4.5 Investigation on the hydrocracking reaction of heavy residues Hydrocraclng of heavy refinery residues comprises a series of parallel and/or consecutive reactions, which cannot be analyzed in isolation. A model of the reaction may be made by substituting analogous substances for the process intermediates. The first step, which precedes hydrogenation, is pyrolysis which may be investigated using thermoanalytical methods, such as TGA and DSC. Depending on the reaction conditions used, varying quantities of reaction products result from hydrocraclung: gases, high-volatile liquid products (e. g. naphtha with a boiling limit of 200 "C), low-volatile heavy oils, and nonboiling solid residues. The gases foimed and the high-volatile products can be analyzed by conventional methods, but the non-boiling residues and the low-volatile heavy oils cannot be separated by distillation. In this case index numbers, which can be correlated with the reaction conditions, can be found using thermoanalytical methods. Two basic investigations will be described here. In both experimental series, a batch reactor with a volume of 108 cm3 was used for the hydrocracking reaction. The first
4.5 Investigation on the hydrocrucking reaction of heavy residues
297
experimental series was carried out on one vacuum residue (VR Kirkuk), using a cold hydrogen pressure of 120 bar and applying two different reaction temperatures (435 "C and 455 "C). The aim was to test the application of thermoanalytical methods in this field of investigation and to acquire information concerning the influence of the reaction temperature and the residence time on the yields of the different products. The residence time was varied from 0 to 100 minutes [4-40,4-411. Zero residence time means that the system was quenched immediately, as soon as the pre-selected temperature was attained in the reactor. The second, more extensive, investigation on nine vacuum residues (VR) and two derived visbreaker residues (VVR) used reactions at three different temperatures (410 OC,440 OC, and 460 "C), with a constant residence time of 30 minutes, and cold hydrogen pressure of 90 bar. The aim of this experiment was to investigate the influence of the origin of the eleven residues, from five different oil regions, upon their reaction behavior [4-421. The products of the reactions, that is, the gases, high-volatile oil (naphtha), low-volatile heavy oil, and solid residues, were isolated after the reaction (after quenching) for analysis. The isolated heavy oils were investigated using thermoanalytical methods. In addition the kinetics of the pyrolysis reaction were investigated in the second series of experiments.
4.5.1 Investigations on a vacuum residue from Kirkuk The vacuum residue from Kirkuk was characterized by elemental analysis, average molecular weight (vapor pressure osmometry), viscosity, density, asphaltenes content, and the usual index numbers of thermogravimetry (table 4-123): Table 4-123: Analysis of vacuum residue Kirkuk. Element analysis: H (%I c (%I H/C* s 11.27 85.27 1.59 2.76 *: atomic ratio Average molecular weight: 1 600 g/Mole Viscosity: 31 376 mm2/s (50 "C); 2 333 mm2/s (70 "C) Asphaltenes: 1.3 % (Cyclohexane precipitation) Density: 0.96 g/cm3 Thermogravimetry: T1 % T5 % ("C) ("C) 300 360
AG300 (wt%) 1
AG400 (wt%) 12.9
N (%I 0.1
R800 (wt%) 10.4
DTG (%/min) 5.26
0 (%I 0.6
Tm ("C) 460
298
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
The quality of the heavy oil produced bears a direct relation to the addition of hydrogen during the hydrocracking reaction. The hydrogen addition (wt%) was calculated according to equation 4-1: (Eq.4-1) where:
H2add= addition of hydrogen (wt%) Pstat = pressure of H, prior to the reaction (cold pressure) (bar) Pend = cold pressure after the reaction (bar) = volume of hydrogen in the gas after the reaction (~01%) = residual gas volume in the reactor prior to the reaction (1) T = room temperature (K) = molecular weight of hydrogen (g1Mole) = weight of vacuum residue prior to the reaction (g)
%
The results of the element analysis and the average molecular weight of the heavy oil produced, as well as the consumption of hydrogen in relation to the selected reaction parameters are listed in Table 4-124. The results of thermogravimetry of the heavy oils produced is shown in Table 4-125. Fig. 4-100 shows the plots of T5 YO versus residence time and Fig. 4-101 the plot of AG400 and R800 versus residence time, each at two different temperatures. Depending on the reaction conditions, T5 % varies from 90 "C up to 220 "C. The evaporation start temperature is strongly influenced by the reaction temperature, as Fig. 4-100 clearly shows. Heating up to the reaction temperature influences the results: a difference in the reactor temperature of 20 "C (435 "C and 455 "C) results in a decrease of the evaporation start temperature by 65 "C. The value at zero residence time is taken on quenching after the Table 4-124: Element analysis, molecular weight and hydrogen reception of heavy oils produced by hydrocracking.
No.
Reaction Parameters PH2/ Tlt bar1"Clmin
-
M
C
H
gm01
%
%
86.1 89.5 86.1 86.9
11.47 11.05 11.12 11.24 11.26
1.60 1.54 1.55 1.56 1.56
0.17 0.26 0.48 0.60 0.64
86.7 87.0 86.9 86.8 87.6
11.32 11.0 10.83 10.20 9.70
1.57 1,51 1.50 1.41 1.33
0.22 0.50 0.86 1.o 1.30
HIC
H2 iecepted
%
~
1 2 3 4 5
120/43510 1201435I15 1201435130 120/435I60 12'01435I90
6 7 8 9 10
120145510 l20l455l15 1201455130 1201455160 1201455190
86.6
~
-
M: Average molecular weight
620 450 323 427
4.5 Investigation on the hydrocracking reaction of heavy residues
299
Table 4-125: Thermogravimetry of the products from hydrocracking experiments (Argon 25 cm3/min, p = 10 Klmin). Hydrocracking
__
No.
1
Therinogravime try
Reaction Parameters T1 %
PlTlt bar1"CImin
"C
T5 %
R
AG
DTG
100
200
300
400
600
800
"C
%
%
%
%
%
%
222 154 135
0.3 1.0 1.8
3.7 10.4 18.3 10.6 26.7 49.0 17.7 42.0 66.4
13.3 11.9 12.8 11.8 7.8 7.0 10.7
10.0
1 2 3
120143510 123 120/435/15 100 120/435/30 84
4
120/435/60
62
94
5.9
21.8
5
1201435190
73
107
3.7
34.1 58.5
67.4
13.6
7.1
6 7
1201455l0 106 1201455/15 80
157 107
0.8 3.2
9.2 22.9 28.8 47.6
44.0 65.3
12.0 13.9
11.1 11.0
8
120/455/30
67
100
1.0
40.0
63.9
79.2
7.0
6.5
9
120/455/60
66
94
6.6
38.4
57.6 73.5
7.3
6.8
10
120/455/90
83
120
2.2
23.5
42.4
7.1
7.0
-
54.6 71.8
T,
%/min
"C
10.21 5.79 2.34 3.96 1.97 1.95 3.11 4.00 2.17
456 450 249 446 215 447 157 410 452
6.51 2.50 3.33 3.19 2.00 2.95 2.70 2.74 548
459 145 44 1 147 438 140 447 167 454
I
59.2
pre-selected reactor temperature had been reached. This difference decrease with increasing residence times. The curves for 435 "C and 455 "C reaction temperatures have a point of intersection at 65 minutes residence time, which is also the minimum of the evaporation start temperature. Above 65 minutes residence time the slopes of both curves reverse. This is because of the increasing tendency of the radicals to recombine when the quantity of hydrogen is no longer sufficient to saturate the radical fragments. If we remember that T5 % for the vacuum residue itself is 360 "C, and that the real boiling temperature is about 100 "C higher, we must attribute weight losses in thermogravimetry, above an instrument temperature of 400 OC, to pyrolysis. The curve of AG400 from the experiment at 435 "C versus residence time (Fig. 4-101) is comparable to that of T5 % versus residence time. This implies that an improvement occurs in the quantity and quality of the heavy oil produced, with increasing residence time at lower temperatures, since the quantity of the distillable fraction AG400 increases whereas the evaporation start temperature decreases. On the other hand a drastic decrease of A6400 occur at reaction temperature 455 OC, when the residence time is > 30 minutes, whereas an increase of T5 % starts at 60 minutes residence time. An explanation might be that, at a certain residence time, naphtha starts to form from the heavy oils, since there is a limited quantity of compounds within the vacuum residues which can be hydrogenated. This assumption is corroborated by the constancy of
300
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
0
100
P2
3
10
20
30
40
50
60
70 80 90 R e s i d e n c e Time ( m i n )
Fig. 4-100 Thermogravimetry of Reaction Products from Hydrocracking. Vaporization Start Temperature T.5 % of the Heavy Oil Fraction versus Residence Time Curve 1: Reactor Temperature 435 "C Curve 2: Reactor Temperature 455 "C according to [4-411
the total oil formation i.e. the sum of naphtha and the distillable fraction AG400 [4-401. This kind of secondary hydrogenation of the heavy oil results in a decrease of AG400 but only has a minor influence on T5 % at first. Later on the recombination of radicals leads to an increase in T5 %. This might provide a plausible explanation for the time lag between the points of inflexion of the curves of T5 % and AG400 versus time (Fig. 4-100 and 4-101). Comparison of R600 and R8OO shows that, with one exception, there is only a difference of 1 or 2 %, which implies that, above 600 "C, hardly any degradable material is left. The coke residue decreases slightly with increasing residence time, but the amount of coke is small compared to that of the vacuum residue. This indicates that the high-molecularweight material does not undergo conversion under the reaction conditions of the hydrocracking process. The maximum of the weight loss rate, DTG, is a useful indicator for the reaction kinetics at the corresponding temperatures, Tm. Below 400°C Tmx represents the kinetics of substance transportation, whereas above 400 OC, it represents the reaction kinetics of pyrolysis. The DTG of 5.3 %/min with a T-. of 460 "C for the vacuum residue definitely lies in the reaction lunetic region. The products from hydrocracking experiments exhibit DTG peak maxima at very varying temperatures, and sometimes there is more than one maximum. In Table 4-126 the values of the DTG maxima are listed and associated with the
301
4.5 Investigation on the hydrocracking reaction of heavy residues
:{ /I' /
20
lUh-
A
= 7
L
I
I
I
-
433
0 I
4
I
I
455 "C
435 " c
Transportation kinetics
Reaction kinetics
DTG (%/min)
Tmax ("C)
t* (mid
DTG (%/min)
Tm ("C)
0 15 30 60 90
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.34 1.97 3.11
249 215 157
2.50 3.19 2.95 2.74
145 147 140 167
0 15 30 60 90
10.21 3.96 3.96 1.95 2.17
456 446 446 447 452
6.51 3.33 2.00 2.70 5.48
459 44 1 438 447 454
t*: Residence time for the hydrocracking
302
4 Theimoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
residence times. The rather mild reaction temperature of 435 "C does not produce any data for transportation kinetics at the beginning, notwithstanding the existence of some evaporation losses (AG100-AG300). Maxima of the weight loss rate DTG were first observed at 30 minutes residence time, which may be related to the increasing quantitiy of evaporated substance (AG300). The peak maximum temperatures Tmaxin the region of transportation kinetics decrease with increasing residence time whereas the maximum of the weight loss rate, DTG, passes through a minimum value at a residence time of 60 minutes. At the higher reaction temperature of 455 "C the maxima of the weight loss rate DTG in the transportation region increase slightly with increasing residence times. The start of evaporation is earlier and evaporation clearly increases. The rise of the reaction temperature leads to decrease of Tlmxin the region of transportation kinetics, which implies the formation of lower-boiling substances. No further distinct relationship of the temperature with the residence time is evident. In the region of reaction kinetics, and for experiments at 435 O C , heating up to the reaction temperature only yields twice the weight loss rate for the heavy oil produced, compared to the vacuum residue. The maxima of the weight loss rates DTG decrease drastically with increasing residence time. Nevertheless the reaction temperature of 455 "C gives considerably less reduction of the weight loss rates DTG with reagard to the increasing residence times, indicating that the reaction starts very early. Independent of the experimental parameters, Tmx varies in a relatively small range between 440 "C and
I
T5X X
25.
A3
/-
x
Y
-
H2-Consumption ( w t X )
4.5 Investigation on the hydrocracking reaction of heavy residues
303
460 "C. The highest value of the peak maximum temperature has been found to be 460 OC, which is regarded as the upper limit for all the heavy oils, and which is also T,, of the vacuum residue. The maximum value of DTG depends on the absolute quantity of transportable substance at the temperature T-. For equal quantities of substance the maximum value of DTG depends on the range of the boiling or crack temperature. Therefore the size of the DTG peak and its maximum can also be an indicator for the homogeneity of the boiling or reacting substance. The quality of the heavy oil depends on the intensity of hydrogenation, therefore the index numbers from thermogravimetery are expected to depend on the consumption of hydrogen. Fig. 4-102 shows the plot of T5 % and AG400 both versus hydrogen consumption. Two curves which are nearly mirror images are produced for all temperatures and all residence times. The evaporation start temperature T5 % passes through a minimum at a hydrogen consumption of 0.8 %, whereas the distillable fraction AG400 passes through a maximum at that point. The further consumption of hydrogen is explained by the conversion of heavy oils to naphtha and gases. The average molecular weight 2 can be correlated with data from thermogravimetry as shown in Fig. 4-103. Correlation of T5 % with M is given in equation 4-2:
T5 % = 0.2 M
200
+ 33.1
Eq. 4-22
-
175 150
-
--
-- -
Rolecu ar Weigh
-4G400 -0
( M e a n r
I
350 4 0 0
500
600
700
800
900
Fig. 4-1 03 Thermogravimetry of Reaction Products from Hydrocracking. Vaporization Start Temperature 7'5 % and Distillable Part AG400 of the Heavy Oil Fraction versus Mean Molecular Weight. according to [4-411
304
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
The coefficient of correlation is r = 0.98. A similar correlation of the weight loss up to 400 "C, AG400, with the average molecular weight @ also exists (equation 4-3): AG400 = -8.93 ;i? + 102.5 r = 0.97
Eq. 4-3
For both correlations very high coefficients r were computed, which confirm the relationships. The linear equations permit a rough estimate of the thermal behavior if the molecular weight is known and vice versa. Combination of the equations 4-2 and 4-3 gives the formal relation of AG400 with T5 % (equation 4-4). AG400 = -44.65 T5 % + 1 580.4
Eq. 4-4
4.5.2 Investigation on residues of different origins Eleven different distillation residues from five oil regions were used for investigations on the hydrocracking reaction. Vacuum residues (VR) and a visbreaker residue (VVR) produced from each were available from a Mexican and a Libyan crude. The residues and their origins are listed in Table 4-127; their analytical data is given in Table 4-128. It is evident that the content of heteroatoms varies considerably depending on the origin of the samples, whereas the atomic H/C ratio exhibits only small differences (mean value X = 1.415, standard deviation k s = 0.022 equals a coefficient of variation k V = 1.56 % relative). All experiments were once again carried out in the batch reactor with 108 cm3volume, and cold pressure of hydrogen of 90 bar. The residence time was constant at 30 minutes, Table 4-127: Residues under investigation ~~~~
~
Sample No.
Oil region
Field
Nature of the sample
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Mexico Mexico Libyan Libyan Middle East Middle East Middle East Venezuela Venezuela Canada Canada
Isthmus Isthmus Zueitina Zueitina Arabian Medium Arabian Heavy Kuwait Tia Juana Morichal Cold Lake Marguerite Lake
Visbreaker residue (VVR) Vacuum residue (VR) Visbreaker residue (VVR) Vacuum residue (VR) Vacuum residue (VR) Vacuum residue (VR) Vacuum residue (VR) Vacuum residue (VR) Vacuum residue (VR) Vacuum residue (VR) Vacuum residue (VR)
* Cyclohexane precipitation ** Conradson coke residue
6 7 8 9 10 11 -
-
1.0369
-
-
-
-
0.9866 0.9792 0.9864 0.9826
1 2 3 4 5
Isthmus VVR Isthmus VR Zueitina VVR Zueitina VR Arabian Medium VR Arabian Heavy VR Kuwait VR Tia Juana VR Morichal VR Cold Lake VR Marguerite Lake VR
Density [g/cm3]
Sample No.
16.2 10.7 14.0 6.3 12.7 0.75 18.60 0.92 12.3 19.7 20.8
1045 975 1107 876 837 892 872
Asphaltenes* [wt%]
785 938 994 1276
[g/Mol]
a
Table 4-128: Analytical data of the original samples (feed).
21.02
20.86 21.65 22.04 21.42 20.53 20.28
24.93 24.0 28.88 18.17
CCR** [wt%]
84.03
84.28 84.69 83.81 84.60 84.46 84.08
86.27 85.82 86.85 85.68
C [wt%]
9.80
10.10 10.26 10.09 9.91 9.89 10.07
10.03 10.25 10.11 10.43
H [wt%]
0.18
0.16 0.36 0.42 0.46 0.90 0.18
0.44 0.42 0.60 0.58
N [wt%]
5.69
4.95 4.15 5.01 3.21 4.84 5.20
2.70 2.64 2.21 2.54
S [wt%]
0
0.30
0.51 0.54 0.73 1.82 0.70 0.47
1.06 1.04 0.79 0.58
[wt%]
1.39
1.43 1.44 1.43 1.40 1.40 1.43
1.39 1.42 1.39 1.45
H/C atomic
Q
4
a
as
$
F:
$ 2
5
8
$ .1'
3
g.
0s
$,
?
L,
306
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
fixed from reaching the pre-set nominal temperature (410 "C, 440 "C, and 460 "C). After quenching the gases, the low-boiling oil (final boiling point 200 "C), and the solid residue were separated using published methods [4-431. The isolated product which still contains the asphaltenes is defined as heavy oil and the fraction with a final boiling point of 200 "C as light oil. The distributions of the various products as a result of the reaction temperature are listed in Tables 4-129 to 4-131. Table 4-129: Distribution of products from hydropyrolysis at 410 "C (wt %) Sample No.
Heavy Oil
Light Oil
Residue
Gases
Asphaltenes*
95.19 94.31 93.46 93.50
2.05 3.23 4.57 4.21
1.22 1.07 0.98 0.82
0.33 0.30 0.34 0.32
12.70 4.90 13.30 0.80
0.20 0.16 0.17 0.16
91.36
5.81
0.79
0.44
4.30
0.18
91.81 91.60 90.62 87.63 88.56
6.45 5.03 7.0 9.19 8.39
0.77 0.68 0.70 0.81 0.81
0.43 0.39 0.37 0.58 0.59
2.70 4.60 3.10 10.40 9.30
0.17 0.20 0.20 0.22 0.30
88.36
8.18
0.75
0.50
9.80
0.33
~~~~~~
6 7 8 9 10 11
*
Isthmus VVR Isthmus VR Zueitina VVR Zueitana VR Arabian Medium VR Arabian Heavy VR Kuwait VR Tia Juana VR Morichal VR Cold Lake VR Marguerite Lake VR
~~
H, Consumption ~
~~
Component of the heavy oil
Table 4-130: Distribution of products from hydropyrolysis at 440 "C (wt %). Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
*
Isthmus VVR Isthmus VR Zueitina VVR Zueitina VR Arabian Medium VR Arabian Heavy VR Kuwait VR Tia Juana VR Morichal VR Cold Lake VR Marguerite Lake VR
Heavy Oil
Light Oil
Residue
Gases
Asphaltenes"
H, Consumption
73.46 7 1.05 72.76 73.48
17.88 21.56 17.38 21.49
6.52 6.09 8.24 4.02
1.37 1.49 1.37 1.31
16.50 15.30 17.70 11.40
0.46 0.49 0.44 0.41
64.92
25.94
6.61
1.64
13.00
0.47
64.92 65.65 62.00 58.74 59.47
24.56 25.17 28.91 29.60 29.46
7.83 6.53 8.09 8.31 6.70
1.62 1.68 1.57 2.15 2.38
12.70 13.60 12.40 14.00 14.00
0.46 0.50 0.45 0.56 0.68
61.31
27.24
6.39
2.61
14.90
0.68
Component of the heavy oil
4.5 Investigation on the hydrocracking reaction of heavy residues
307
Table 4-131: Distribution of products from hydropyrolysis at 460 "C (wt %) Sample No.
6 7 8 9 10 11
*
Isthmus VVR Isthmus VR Zueitina VVR Zueitina VR Arabian Medium VR Arabian Heavy VR Kuwait VR Tia Juana VR Morichal VR Cold Lake VR Marguerite Lake VR
Heavy Oil
Light Oil
Residue
Gases
Asphaltenes*
H, Consumption
49.48 40.77 44.85 49.20
32.11 4 1.99 34.27 38.04
15.31 14.45 18.32 10.12
2.13 3.06 2.80 3.35
14.20 10.30 13.20 9.60
0.75 0.83 0.73 0.83
43.24
38.88
12.94
3.93
10.10
0.88
43.90 44.31 42.78 44.78 43.95
35.74 37.90 36.91 35.73 37.76
14.52 13.17 14.62 12.80 10.80
4.38 3.84 3.58 4.24 4.59
10.90 9.90 9.30 11.30 11.90
0.76 0.87 0.86 0.95 1.10
43.95
38.80
11.05
4.47
12.80
1.08
Component of the heavy oil
The content of heavy oil decreases with increasing temperature whereas the content of light oil increases, as desired. Unfortunately the undesired by products such as gases and residues also increase due to increasing temperatures. At equal reaction temperatures the distribution of the products is related to the origin of the samples. Generally the hydrogen consumption rises, with increasing reaction temperatures and is also dependent on the origin. The original samples and the heavy oils produced therefrom were investigated using thermoanalytical methods. Thermogravimetry in inert atmosphere, of the original samples and the heavy oils produced, gives graphs which are recognizable from the investigation on other heavy residues (see chapter 4.2). Calculation of the simulated distillation therefrom results in the distillation curves, which are shown in Fig. 4-104, for the example of Arabian Heavy VR and the three heavy oils produced at the three different reaction temperatures. The index numbers of thermogravimetry in inert gas of the original samples and the corresponding heavy oils are listed in the Tables 4-132 to 4-134. For all the products from the experiments at 410 "C and 440 "C reaction temperature, the evaporation start temperatures (T1 % and T5 %) and the maxima of the weight loss rate, DTG, are reduced, whereas the distillable fractions, AG400 increase. Consequently the crackable residue (CR) also decreases with increasing reaction temperature. At the reaction temperature of 460 "C the trend is partly inverted. The evaporation start temperatures of some products do increase again and the distillable fractions decrease. We may conclude that for the samples Isthmus VR, Kuwait VR, Tia Juana VR, Cold Lake VR, and Marguerite Lake VR the optimal reaction temperature has already been exceeded, which would deliver the desired product qualities. This is analogous to the results published by P. Zhang et al. [4-411, which also describe the recovery of the rise in the evaporation start temperatures with increasing reaction temperatures.
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
800
1
BP
("C)
700.
600
500
Feed
400
410°C 440°C 460'C
300
Loss ( w t Z ) ,
200
10
20 3 0
40
50 60 70 80
90
.
100
Fig. 4-104 Simulated Distillation (TG 750) * Feed Arabian Heavy VR x Heavy Oil Fraction, Reactor Temperature 410 "C 0 Heavy Oil Fraction, Reactor Temperature 440 "C 0Heavy Oil Fraction, Reactor Temperature 460 "C
7 8 9 10 11
6
1 2 3 4 5
No.
Sample
Isthmus VVR Isthmus VR Zueitina VVR Zueitina VR Arabian Medium VR Arabian Heavy VR Kuwait VR Tia Juana VR Morichal VR Cold Lake VR Marguerite Lake VR
~
140 107 127 144 118 111
224
124
263 254 263 271 201 229
127 134 129 143
86
113 87 95 98 95
103
94 95 100 89
106
105 89 105 90 100
100
87 104 97 78
410°C 440°C 460°C
177 192 270 283
Feed
T1 % ["C]
283
312 339 325 263 277
329
263 314 348 350
Feed
167
210 175 192 169 169
193
204 218 216 224
123
154 127 133 137 132
144
134 142 143 142
147
143 130 147 129 136
139
122 148 131 116
410°C 440°C 460°C
T5 % ["C]
Table 4-132: Index numbers from thermogravimetry of orginal samples (feed) and heavy oils. Evaporation start temperatures and distillable fraction.
30.5
20.4 15.5 20.8 32.5 32.6
18.0
24.9 17.5 15.5 15.1
Feed
49.2
35.2 40.9 41.2 51.5 49.0
34.9
31.5 27.2 27.7 28.5
62.3
55.8 55.8 62.8 61.3 59.7
52.9
52.6 50.6 48.0 54.8
56.3
55.8 51.4 52.3 60.5 61.3
50.1
52.1 54.6 49.5 55.7
410 "C 440°C 460°C
A G 400 [wt%]
0 Q
W
4
R
5
f:
2
$
5
$
s
%
8
3
5
%
%,
3
cr,
.a
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Sample No.
Isthmus VVR Isthmus VR Zueitina VVR Zueitina VR Arabian Medium VR Arabian Heavy VR Kuwait VR Tia Jnana VR Morichal VR Cold Lake VR Marguerite Lake VR
5.88 6.77 6.80 7.97 4.08 4.58 4.76 4.62 3.78 3.86 3.29
7.25
1.86
2.57 2.81 2.86 2.82 2.99 2.53 2.94 1.91 2.20 1.71
DTG (%/min) 410°C 440°C
5.06 6.97 8.85 10.49 6.91 8.79 9.86 7.99 6.61 6.73
Feed
3.02
3.25 3.23 3.92 2.62 2.26 2.46 3.34 2.75 2.06 2.83
460°C
473
478 458 462 477 475 417 476 417 470 472
Feed
462
485 484 472 473 473 47 1 455 411 462 466
460
412 473 472 469 477 462 460 456 462 467
440 "C
Tux ("C) 410 "C
Table 4-133: Index numbers from the thermogravimetry of original samples (feed) and heavy oils. Maximum of the weight loss rate DTG and corresponding peak maximum temperature in the cracking region.
473
472 477 412 452 450 440 460 471 458 463
460°C
R
ad
9
E
h;
3
2
&
a
5
h;
3
s2
2
h 0.
5'
23.4 18.0 17.6 17.5 18.8 20.7
15.2 15.3 17.7 17.0 15.6 15.5
7 8 9 10 11
4 5 6
20.2 16.9 20.8 13.7 15.0
31.7 26.7 22.3 18.5 17.0
1 2
Isthmus VVR Isthmus VR Zueitina VVR Zueitina VR Arabian Medium VR Arabian Heavy VR Kuwait VR Tia Juana VR Morichal VR Cold Lake VR Marguerite Lake VR
Feed
15.8
22.8 18,8 16.2 16.8 19.7
19.7 19.4 20.2 15.2 16.9
14.8
25.2 20.1 26.2 17.1 13.0
17.2 14.6 16.2 20.2 25.1
410 "C 440 "C 460 "C
R 600 [wt %]
No.
Sample
19.0 15.8 19.9 12.2 13.5 21.2 14.8 16.2 15.8 17.2 19.8
14.3 14.2 15.9 15.8 14.5 14.4
14.8
21.6 16.3 15.1 15.5 18.6
18.4 18.3 19.2 14.3 15.7
14.1
22.1 17.6 21.1 16.2 12.0
16.2 13.9 15.3 18.2 21.6
410°C 440°C 460°C
21.5 18.2 20.9 9.7 15.0
Feed
R 800 [wt %]
Table 4-134: Index numbers from thermogravimetry of original samples (feed) and heavy oils. Coke residues and crackable part.
43.6 44.3 42.6 32.7 33.8 31.0
52.3
49.5 57.0 52.4 59.3 51.6
21.9
22.6 27.9 22.1 23.2 21.7
29.0 31.1 32.8 30.9 31.4
29.6
22.1 31.0 26.6 23.0 26.7
31.7 31.5 35.2 26.1 28.3
410°C 440°C 460°C
65.3 70.3 63.3 51.7 50.2
53.6 64.3 63.6 75.2 67.3
Feed
CR [wt %]
n
?i
%
$.
a
$ 2
5i
ff
8.s
0s
5.
L,
3 12
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
The curves of simulated distillation for the products from the experiments at 410 "C already show the existence of considerably lighter products compared to the original samples. The products of the experiments at 440 "C and 460 "C temperature are still lighter, but their evaporation behavior is the same. The coking reaction is not complete at 600 "C as discussed above [4-12,4-161. That is also true for the residues at 600 "C (12600). This may clearly be demonstrated for the vacuum and visbreaker residues of the Mexican crude Isthmus, where the residue at 800 "C is only two thirds of that at 600 "C. The heavy oils of these samples exhibit considerably smaller differences between R600 and R800, which is also true for the other original samples and their reaction products. Scarcely any difference can be observed between residues R600 and R800. The quantity of residue does not bear a simple relationship to the reaction temperature; both increasing and decreasing values of R600 and R800 were observed as the reaction temperature increased. The increase of R600 and R800 for the heavy oils produced indicates that extensive hydrogenation of the components of the samples which are subject to hydrocracking, has occurred and that the coke-forming content is enriched. The visbreaker residues contain less of the crackable substances (CR) than the corresponding vacuum residues. The difference of the CR of approximately 10 wt% between the two residues shows that the visbreaking process uses relatively mild crack severity. The CR content is than decreased drastically during the hydrocracking experiments. Whereas the reaction temperature of 410 "C is still a rather mild crack severity, 440 "C represents the optimal reaction temperature for most cases. The differences of the CR from the experiments at 440 "C and 460 "C are less than those from the experiments at 410 "C and 440 "C. Some samples (Isthmus VVR, Zueitina VVR, Kuwait VR, Tia Juana VR, Cold Lake VR, and Marguerite Lake VR) gave a higher CR in the experiments at 460 "C. This might be a consequence of the recombination of preformed radicals if the supply of hydrogen is insufficient or the radical recombination may have higher reaction rate than that of the hydrogenation. The maximum of the weight loss rate DTG is an indicator for the reaction kinetics. The peak maximum temperature Tmxmay give the preliminary information as to the nature of the reaction. A Tmx < 400 "C corresponds to the transportation kinetics of evaporating substances and Tmx> 400 "C corresponds to the reaction kinetics of pyrolysis. Each of the original samples exhibits a Tmax between 460 "C and 480 OC, which is unquestionably in the region of reaction hnetics. The absolute values of DTG scatter unsystematically between 5.0 and 10.5 %/min. The DTG of the visbreaker residues are considerably smaller (from 15 to 28 % relative) than those of the corresponding vacuum residues, which also indicates less content of crackable substances. Each of the products from the experiments at 460 "C exhibit two DTG peak maxima (with only one exception), which appear in the region of transportation kinetics at varying temperatures. The absolute value of DTG is rather slow (approximately 2.0 %/min). On the other hand, only five products out of eleven, from the experiments at 440 "Ctemperature show one peak maximum in the region of transportation kinetics (Arabian Heavy VR; Tia Juana VR, Morichal VR, Cold Lake VR, and Marguerite Lake VR). The heavy oils produced from the experiments at 410 "C do not have a DTG maximum below 350 "C temperature (Table 4-135).
313
4.5 Investigation on the hydrocracking reaction of heavy residues
Table 4-135: Maximum of weight loss rate DTG and corresponding peak maximum temperature in the evaporation region Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
410°C Isthmus VVR Isthmus VR Zueitina VVR Zueitina VR Arabian Medium VR Arabian Heavy VR Kuwait VR Tia Juana VR Morichal VR Cold Lake VR Marguerite Lake VR
DTG (%/min) 440°C 460°C -
410°C
T,, 03 440°C
-
305
-
-
-
295 189 352 301 247 360
2.32 2.40 2.02 2.11
-
-
2.26 1.85 2.20 1.71
1.98 1.76 2.16 1.81 2.28
336
338 29 1 154
1.86
1.88
-
313
-
460°C
-
In the region of reaction kinetics, a clear decrease in the DTG values of the heavy oils produced was observed with increasing reaction temperature, with the exception of some products from experiments at 460 "C. Also, an increase of the peak maximum temperatures T,, was discovered, mostly due to increasing reaction temperature. The Tm values range between 440 "C and 480 "C. As mentioned above, the height of the DTG peak depends on the homogeneity of the substance, which evaporates or cracks at the average temperature T-. Individual substances will have high, narrow peaks whereas multi-component systems have low, broad peaks. For example, the products from the reactions at 440 "C from the Mexican and Libyan vacuum and visbreaker residues all have very broad, flat peaks. The uptake or consumption of hydrogen represents a criterion of the intensity of the hydrogenation. It is also expected that some index numbers of thermogravimetry will correlate to the consumption of hydrogen. This is verified, for example with the evaporation start temperature T5 % (Fig. 4-105), r = 0.924 coefficient of correlation, or with the distillable fraction AG400 (Fig. 4-106), r = 0.836. Figs. 4-105 and 4-106 clearly show that a higher consumption of hydrogen (0.4 wt%) leads to higher quantities of light products. This is primarily a consequence of the height of the reaction temperature, but the origin can also have an effect, although this influence cannot be quantified. At both reaction temperatures (410 "C and 440 "C) the T5 % values of the heavy oils produced fall into a series of their origins: Mexico > Middle East + North Africa > Venezuela + Canada. At 460°C such differences no longer exist. For the amounts of distillable fractions AG400 the order of succession is reversed. The differences for the characteristics of the products formed decrease with the rise of the reaction temperatures, which can be shown by correlating the hydrogen consumption
3 14
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
250
T5X ("C) f
410'C
x
440'C
0
460°C
x
5 f
x
200
X
150 c
XXXX
X X rn
H2 Consumption (wtX1 __e
100 0:5
1
1,5
Fig. 4-105 Thermogravimetry of Reaction Products from Hydrocracking. Vaporization Start Temperature T.5 % of the Heavy Oil Fraction versus H,-Consumption during the Reaction
with the content of crackable substances, CR. The coefficient of correlation r = 0.831 at 410 "C decreases to r = 0.254 at 460 "C. This leads to the conclusion that at 460 "C another reaction mechanism takes place in addition to the hydrogenation. The function of the relative decrease of the crackable substance ACR ACR =
CR(origina1) - CR(product) . 100 (%) CR(original)
versus the hydrogen consumption is represented by a regression curve possessing a coefficient of correlation r = 0.858, with a maximum which corresponds to the hydrogen consumption at 440 "C (Fig. 4-107). The Correlation of thermogravimetric index numbers with analytical data are listed in Table 4-136. Out of the three index numbers which describe the evaporation behavior,
4.5 Investigation on the hydrocracking reaction of heavy residues
315
70 A6400 ( % I X
x X
60
-
m
i
X
X
xx
7
clL7 rn
50
40
30
*
410'C
x
440'C 460'C
-
H2Consumption ( w t X ) 20
7
I
0,5
1
1,s
Fig. 4-106 Thennogravimetry of Reaction Products from Hydrocracking. Distillable Part AG400 of the Heavy Oil Fraction versus H2-Consumption during the Reaction
AG400 may be correlated satisfactorily with the average molecular weight of the original samples and their reaction products (heavy oils). The evaporation start temperatures T1 % and T5 % only give satisfactory correlation with the average molecular weight of the original samples. The crackable residue, CR, correlates with the average molecular weight of the original samples, and of the heavy oils from the reactions at 410 "C and 440 OC, but not with the molecular weight of the products from the 460 "C experiments. The coke residues R600 and R800 do not correlate with the asphaltene content in the original samples, but do correlate with that of the products from the reaction at 410 "C and 440 "C. If the values €or the reaction products from Arabian Heavy VR are excluded, the coefficients of correlation increase considerably (Table 4-136, no. 7 and no. 8). The Conradson coke residues (DIN 51 551) were only determined for the original samples. As expected, the correlation of the Conradson coke with R800 is very good [4-161.
3 16
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
t GI3 713
-
50
-
ACR (%’
48 -
“I
Y )k*
Y
30
2I3 18
-
x iy
iK
x:
410’C
x
440’C
IN
460’C
Y
Y
Hi! C o n s u m p t i o n ( w t X ) O J
(3.5
L3
-
1
1 ~ 5
1
Fig. 4-107 Thermogravimetry of Reaction Products from Hydrocracking. Change in Quantity of Crackable Substance ACR of the Heavy Oil Fraction versus H2-Consumption during the Reaction.
Table 4-136: Correlations of index numbers from thermogravimetry with analytical data. Sample No.
Index number Analysis of ThermoValue gravimetry :
Feed
Coefficient of correlation r Products of the reaction at 410°C 440°C 460°C
-
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
T1% T5 % AG 400 CR R 600 R 800 R 600
8
R 800
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
R 800 CR T1 % T5 % AG 400 R 600 R 800 CR
M M M
M Asphaltenes Asphaltenes Asphaltenes (without Arabian Heavy) Asphaltenes (without Arabian Heavy) Conradson coke H2-Consumption H/C H/C H/C H/C H/C H/C
0.7 18 0.758 0.610 0.793 0.054 0.197
0.353 0.423 0.543 0.449 0.449 0.534 0.843
0.247 0.389 0.546 0.525 0.377 0.398 0.738
0.045 0.026 0.697 0.118 0.581 0.523
-
0.854
0.778
-
-
0.887 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.83 1 0.458 0.532 0.593 0.622 0.550 0.713
0.628 0.096 0.211 0.494 0.086 0.053 0.531
0.254 0.146 0.192 0.610 0.225 0.270 0.383
4.5 investigation on the hydrocracking reaction of heavy residues
3 17
The H/C ratio only correlates with the distillable fraction AG400. Neither the evaporation start temperatures T1 % and T5 %, nor the coke residues R600 and R8OO give a satisfactory coefficient of correlation with the H/C ratio. All the above-mentioned examples show linear relationship. Hydrogenation is always preceded by a pyrolysis reaction, which supplies shorter, unsaturated fragments of the original long-chain molecules. The pyrolytic behavior of the original samples, which may be investigated very well by DSC is of great interest [4-201. The DSC experiments were carried out using a DuPont 990 Thermal Analyzer equipped with a 910 DSC and pressure cell. The experiments and their evaluation were carried out according to ASTM E 698-79 [3-131 using at least three different heating rates in a hydrocarbon atmosphere (CH,) at 10 bar pressure and with 5 cm3/min gas flow rate in order to simulate the process parameters of thermal cracking. As usual the coefficients of the Arrhenius equation (Eq. 3-37) were calculated, i.e. the activation energy E (ld/Mole) and the frequency factor log A (min-l). The temperature ranges of the maxima of energy consumption are listed in Table 4-137. Four samples showed two maxima of energy consumption each, whereas the other samples showed only one maximum each. The first of the maxima represents an evaporation, as determined by previous investigations. The activation energy calculated here equals the enthalpy of vaporization (Table 4-138). The sample Marguerite Lake VR demonstrated only one DSC peak in the region of evaporation. The Arrhenius coefficients E and log A and the conversions U during the pyrolysis are listed in Table 4-138, where
U=
start weight - end weight start weight
. 100 (%).
The average conversion is approximately 83 % which is comparable with the value found for bitumen and other heavy residues.
Table 4-137: DSC of the original samples (feed) in 10 bar methane. Peak maximum temperatures ("C) Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Isthmus VVR Isthmus VR Zueitina VVR Zueitina VR Arabian Medium VR Arabian Heavy VR Kuwait VR Tia Juana VR Morichal VR Cold Lake VR Marguerite Lake VR
Peak 1
Peak 2
-
445-470 450-475 456-47 1 441-461 438-460 454-475 450-478 438-464 442-463 438-462
364-429 368-405 355-394 350-388
-
332-388
-
3 18
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-138: Coefficients of the Arrhenius equation and conversion of the pyrolysis of the original samples (feed ) in 10 bar methane.
E [kJ/Mol]
Sample No.
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11
Isthmus VVR Peak 1 Peak 2 Isthmus VR Peak 1 Peak 2 Zueitina VVR Peak 1 Peak 2 Zueitina VR Peak 1 Peak 2 Arabian Medium VR Peak 1 Peak 2 Arabian Heavy VR Peak 1 Peak 2 Kuwait VR Peak 1 Peak 2 Tia Juana VR Peak 1 Peak 2 Morichal VR Peak 1 Peak 2 Cold Lake VR Peak 1 Peak 2 Marguerite Lake VR Peak 1 Peak 2
log A [min-'1
u [%I
-
-
233.6
16.369
79.00
86.8 237.2
6.232 16.579
8 1.66
125.3 195.9
9.471 13.678
77.64
114.0 214.9
8.724 15.276
87.36
115.9 254.8
8.982 18.211
83.55
-
-
239.9
16.769
-
-
206.0
14.271
-
-
229.6
16.325
-
-
219.4
15.501
-
-
233.2
16.576
73.4
5.428
-
-
83.51 83.33 83.28 84.21 84.17 -
83.55
The first peaks were observed in a very broad range of temperatures (for example 230-270 "C at p= 5 K/min; 390-430 "C at p= 20 K/nlin). The temperature ranges for the second peaks are much more confined (440-455 "C at p = 5 K/min; 460-480 "C at p = 20 K/min). The differences of the H/C ratio of the samples are very small despite their different origins (H/C = 1.39-1.45). The kinetic coefficients of the vacuum residues are greater than those of the corresponding visbreaker residues. This indicates that the visbreaker residues are subject to thermal damage. The activation energy of the first peaks El may be correlated with analytical data, e.g. the average molecular weight, the asphaltene nitrogen, and sulfur content, (Table 4-1 39).
4.5 Investigation on the hydrocracking reaction of heavy residues
319
Table 4-139: Coefficient of correlation rl for peak 1 Correlation o f the activation energy El with analysis data. Activation energy
Analysis value M Asphaltenes N S
El
El El E,
0.610 0.536 0.946 0.512
Correlation of El with thermogravimetric index numbers, i.e. TI %, T5 %, AG400, and CR is shown in Table 4-140. Table 4-140: Coefficient of correlation r, for peak 1. Correlation of the activation energy E, with index numbers of thermogravimetry. Activation energy
r1
Index number of thermogravimetry T1 % R5 % AG 400 CR
0.816 0.933 0.805 0.685
It is not surprising that the activation energy E , which represents a vaporization enthalpy is related to the average molecular weight M and the index numbers which represent the evaporation behavior (T1 %, T5 %, AG400). On the contrary, the correlation of E, with the nitrogen and sulfur contents is unusual and these results inight be suspected since they are only based on four values each. The activation energy of the pyrolysis reaction E, shows a linear relationship with analytical data such as the nitrogen and sulfur contents, whereas no correlation could be found with the average molecular weight, the colloid composition, or the H/C ratio (Table 4-141). Table 4-141: Coefficient of correlation r2 for peak 2 Correlation of the activation energy E7 with analysis data Activation energy
Analysis value
r2
N
0.605 0.821 (without Morichal, Cold Lake) 0.617 (without Kuwait)
N S
E, decreases with increasing nitrogen concentration and increases with increasing sulfur concentration. That might be a consequence of the weakness of the aliphatic C-N bond,
320
4 Thennoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Fig. 4-1 08 Pyrolysis of Heavy Residues H2-Consumption during Hydrocracking versus natural logarithmus of the Reaction Constant from DSC Pyrolysis
"?
'1
H2Consumption (wt%) Mean of Samples Yo. 10
w k a n o f Samples Yo.
1 -
I) " rl
-
0 "(1
-
(3.4
-
If.2
-
1'1
-
11
8 - 9
-
7
w a n o f Samples Yo.
5
Mean o f Samples l o .
1- 4
T ("C) ___._c
0 -
I
4.6 Oil shale and shale oil
321
whose free bonding enthalpy (243 kJ/Mol) is considerably less than that of the aliphatic C-C bond (297 kJ/Mol) [4-441. This implies that the radical chain reaction of the pyrolysis is accelerated by the greater number of more-easily-formed radicals from the C-N bond. On the other hand it is well known that some sulfur compounds act as radical deactivation agents and thus may retard the pyrolysis reaction. We could not find a relationship of the activation energy E, with process data, e.g. hydrogen consumption or formation of gases, nor with formation of light crack products. However, the plot of hydrogen consumption against the natural logarithmus of the reaction rate constant shows three groups of data corresponding to the three reaction temperatures. A linear regression confirms the correlation by a high coefficient of correlation r = 0.887 (Fig. 4- 108). The consumption of hydrogen increases with increasing reaction rate constant, since more radicals are formed which may be hydrogenated. The plot of hydrogen consumption versus reaction temperature confirms this relationship and indicates that the origin of the samples has an effect, although this is not quantifiable (Fig. 4-109).
4.6 Oil shale and shale oil Any kind of minerals which contain organic substances in large quantities, may be characterized as oil shale regardless of their mineralogical structure. Thus most of the oil shales are not shales in the mineralogical sense, and they do not contain oil, but higher molecular hydrocarbons and heterocompounds, which are only partly soluble and are called kerogens. Besides kerogens, bitumens are also present in variable quantities and these may be extracted using organic solvents. The kerogens are classified as three types: type I is predominantly of marine origin and exhibits the highest H/C ratio (normally 1.4). Type III is predominantly of terrestrial origin and exhibits the lowest H/C ratio (- 1.0). Type I1 is regarded as a blend of type I and type I11 and its H/C ratio lies between those of type I and type III. The O/C ratios increase from type I up to type III. Table 4-142: Element analysis of kerogens [4-451.
Schandelah (Germany) Estonia Aleksinac (Yugoslavia) Green River (USA)
\
\
65.8 77.1
7.7 9.4
2.1 0.4
6.9 2.0
17.5 11.1
1.40 1.46
0.20 0.11
76.6
10.7
3.9
3.9
4.9
1.67
0.05
80.5
10.3
2.4
1.o
5.8
1.53
0.05
322
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
The elemental analysis of some kerogens is listed in Table 4-142. Kerogens are insoluble, in organic solvents and may be isolated using anorganic acids (HCl, HF), which dissolve the mineral matrix. It is disputed whether the material thus isolated still consists of the original kerogens. The processing of oil shale to obtain liquid substances is performed by retorting. Smouldering or low temperaturecoking analysis (in inert gas at 520 "C) according to Fischer is the method for identifying the recoverable oil products (Table 4-143). Table 4-143: Smouldering analysis of oil shales according to Fischer [4-451. Origin
Schandelah (Germany) Estonia Aleksinac (Yugoslavia) Green River (USA)
Humidity
Water from Decomposi tion
Oil
Residue
Gases t Loss
(%)
(%I
(%I
(%I
(%I
3.7 dry
1.7 1.9
5.7 22.0
84.7 70.5
4.2 5.6
5.5
2.1
12.6
15.3
4.5
dry
1.4
10.4
85.7
2.5
In view of current oil prices, inining and processing of oil shale has been suspended in most countries on economic grounds. The fact cannot be ignored that retorting of oil shale produces considerable quantities of carcenogenic polycyclic aromatics. On the other hand known oil shale reservoirs represent a large reserve of fuel for the future.
4.6.1 Investigation using TGA and DSC The largest oil shale reservoir in Turkey is situated near Goynuk representing an estimated capacity of lo9 tons in layers of 100 to 150 meters deep which are not very Table 4-144: Proximate and ultimate analysis of Goynuk oil shale (air-dried basis) [4-461. Moisture (wt %) Ash (wt %) Volatile matter (wt %) Fixed carbon (wt %) C (organic) (wt %) H (wt %) s (wt %) N (wt %) Caloric value (kcal kg-I) Kerogene H/C ratio* Kerogene O/C ratio*
* From demineralized oil shale
6.7 32.6 50.1 10.6 43.5 7.1 1.5 1.4 4840 1.52 0.19
4.6 Oil shale and shale oil
323
homogeneous. The results of a proximate and ultimate analysis [4-461 are given in Table 4-144. The thermogravimetric graphs both in inert gas and in air, of Goyniik oil shale and of its kerogen concentrate (demineralized oil shale) are shown in Figs. 4-110 and 4-11 1. Thermogravimetry in argon shows that there are highly volatile constituents in the oil shale as well as in the kerogen concentrate (T1 %: 27-29 OC; T5 %: 166-243 "C). The distillable fraction AG400 comprises 24-30 wt%. The higher value for the original oil shale indicates that some alteration to the kerogen concentrate occurred as a consequence of the preparation. The residue at 600 "C of the oil shale is 39.2 wt% and that of the kerogen concentrate is 29.1 wt%. At 800 "C the difference in the residues from oil shale and from kerogen concentrate becomes very small (oil shale R800 = 25.0 wt%; kerogen concentrate R800 = 26.4 wt%). Such a result was unexpected, since the oil shale still contains all the mineral
L L 1
200
300
4ud
500
600
Fig. 4-110 Thermogravimetry of Oil Shale Goyniik Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Argon Curve 2: Air
324
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Fig. 4-1I 1 Thermogravimetry of Kerogen Concentrate from Oil Shale Goyniik Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Argon Curve 2: Air
parts of the sample. The graph of weight loss rate, DTG, exhibits two peak maxima at 300 "C and 468 "C for the oil shale whereas the kerogen concentrate has only one rnaximum at 468 "C. TGA in air displays distinct steps in the curve for the oil shale, at temperatures between 225 "C and 270 OC, 290 "C and 400 OC, and 430 "C and 525 "C. The corresponding DTG maximum temperatures occur at 262 "C, 383 OC, and 443 "C. These steps in the TGA curve do not appear so clearly in the thermogravimetry in air of the kerogen concentrate, but the DTG peak maxima are also present at temperatures of 269 'C, 383 "C, and 455 "C. The ash at 800°C of the oil shale amounts to 14.3 wt% and that of the kerogen concentrate to 4.4 wt % indicating that complete demineralization has not taken place. It is not possible to tell whether this weight is partly lost from the minerals of the oil shale.
21
30
27
25
29
22
3.5
400
440
480
520
560
595
Kerogen concentrate at 520 "C
Pyrolysis Temoerature
~
52
35
45
42
45
5.5
35
(%I
45.3 46.5
17.8 17.4
14.0
37.5
51.8
53.3
18.7
24.2
41.5
14.8
90.4 91.9
80.0 80.5
67.5
85.0
82.0
95.0
86.9
75.5
81.6
88.0
(%I
400°C
73.7
85.7
(%I 44.0
(%)
24.0
300°C
200°C
100°C
AG
I
0
2.8
6.0 4.0
4.7
3.0
2.4
2.8
3.2
8.9
5.1
9.1
0
(%I
(%I 0.9
800°C
R
600°C
Table 4-145: Thermogravimetry of the pyrolysates from the retorting of Goyniik oil shale Heating rate p = 10 K/min, Argon 2.5 cm3/min
I
2.48 2.88
2.41 3.45 1.35 2.86 1.67 3.49 2.01 3.55 2.00 3.23 3.03 2.13
(%/min)
DTG
42 258
("CI 24 163 30 244 21 245 28 253 31 254 39 215
Tm
h
2.
; i .
R
b
8a
&
9
9
-
.a
on
326
4 Thennoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Thermogravimetry of the products from retorting at increased temperatures (400 'C, 440 'C, 480 O C , 520 'C, 560 OC, and 595 "C) indicates that this process generates considerably lighter products (Table 4-145). The evaporation start temperature T1 % remains between 21 and 35 "C but T5 % has decreased to between 35 and 55 "C. The distillable fraction AG400 has been increased to values between 82 and 95 wt% with a maximum for the product from retorting at 480 "C. The residue at 600 "C increases with increasing retorting temperature (Fig. 4-112). Each sample exhibits two peak maxima in the DTG curve which are situated in the evaporation region (maximum temperature 258 "C). The results from the product of retorting the kerogen concentrate (at 520 "C) are not very different from the other retorting products. The curves of a simulated distillation are similar to the curve of a degassed German crude oil from a Dogger-pformation reservoir with approximate 28 API. Thermogravimetry in air of the retorting residues provides data of R800 for the oil shale residues from 37-45 wt%, which correspond to nearly twice the amount of the original samples. That implies that approximately a quarter of the organic substance originally present has been distilled by retorting. If the retorting temperature increases, the value of R800 also rises from 4.4 (original sample) to 18 wt% in the retorting residue from the
Fig. 4-112 Thermogravimetry of Pyrolysates from Oil Shale Goyniik Residue at 600 "C R600 versus Pyrolysis Temperature x Oil Shale o Kerogen Concentrate
Benzene/ Methanol (2: 1) Chloroform Toluene
Pyridine
Extraction medium
226 258 238
132 181 157
19.0 18.2
181
20.3
75
0 0.2
0.7
2.3
1.5 2.3
3.1
5.9
16.6
38.9
I 15.8
14.2
11.0 14.7
16.2 40.0 50.8
46.4
10.9 9.0
12.3
3.1 1.5
10.9
5.14 3.88 3.88
4.78
2.22 4.60
:%/min)
[dxiiizl
21.3
DTG
6
Table 4-146: Thermogravimetry of the extracts from Goyniik oil shale Heating rate p = 10 K/min, Argon 25 cm3/min
469 370 448
441
327 467
("c)
T,,
-a
P
b\
328
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
experiment at 520°C temperature. This implies that 14 wt% of the organic substance originally present has been pyrolysed and distilled. Only a small portion of the organic substance may be extracted from the oil shale by organic solvents. Extraction using solvents with different solubility parameters 8, according to Hildebrandt, yields extracts, which have altered characteristicsas a consequence of this solubility parameter (Table 4-146). The following solvents were used:
Pyridine Benzene/Methanol (2 : 1) Chloroform Toluene
21.3 20.3 19.0 18.2
Thennogravimetry in argon shows that the evaporation start temperatures of the extracts (T1 %, T5 %) increase with increasing solubility parameter 8, whereas the distillable fraction AG400 decreases and the residues R600 and R800 increase (Fig. 4-1 13). This is a consequence of the rising amounts of aromatic, coke-generating substances, which were extracted with solvents of increasing solubility parameter. The curves of the simulated distillation of the extracts correspond approximately to that of an atmospheric residue of a Middle East crude (for example AR Kirkuk).
15
10
5
Fig. 4-113 Thermogravimetry of Extracts from Oil Shale Goyniik Residues at 600 "C R600 versus Solubility Parameter 6 of the Extraction Solvent
4.6 Oil shale and shale oil
329
Table 4-147: Kinetics of the pyrolysis of oil shale Goyniik. Argon 5 cm3/min Oil shale
Kerogene concentrate
Peak I Temperature range ("C) E (kJ/Mol) log A (min-')
445-480 262.1 18.551
444-478 294.0 21.014
Peak 2 Temperature range ("C) E (kJ/Mol) log A (min-')
495-550 394.4 22.227
520-550 229.9 14.338 71.4
Conversion (%)
57.9
The investigation of pyrolysis kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79 using DSC in inert gas shows that there are two distinct maxima of the energy consumption for both the oil shale and the kerogen concentrate (Table 4- 147). The activation energy and the frequency factor, which were determined for the first peak, are similar to those of heavy distillation residues. The values of the second peak are extraordinarily high, thus indicating that reactions of parts of the mineral matrix may have an effect. The residues after the reaction amount to 42.1 wt% for the oil shale and to 28.6 wt% for the kerogen concentrate. Since TGA has shown ash content of 14.3 wt% for the oil shale, the amount generated from the organic substance of the oil shale must be 42.1 %-14.3 % = 27.8 %. That means that approximately one-third of the organic substance has been converted to non-volatile products. The analogous calculation for the kerogen concentrates proves that a fraction of 24.8 % of the residue was generated from the organic substance and also confirms the Table 4-148: Kinetics of the oxidation of oil shale Goyniik. Air (7 bar, 5 cm3/min) Oil shale
Kerogen concentrate
Peak 1 Temperature range ("C) E (kJ/Mole) log A (min-')
300-355 132.8 11.772
295-330 124.0 11.057
Peak 2 Temperature range ("C) E (kJ/Mole) log A (min-')
420-460 177.6 12.987
435-475 174.4 12.485
Peak 3 Temperature range ("C) E W/Mole) log A (min-') Conversion (%)
550-570 357.8 22.907 76.9
-
95.7
330
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
conversion of approximately one-third of the organic substance in the kerogen concentrate to non-volatile products. Investigation of oxidation kinetics displays three distinct and easily-evaluated peak maxima for the oil shale and only two peaks for the kerogen concentrate. The activation energy and frequency factor for both the first and the second peak demonstrate similar values for both oil shale and kerogen concentrate. The third peak, which is only present in the DSC of the oil shale, reveals fairly high values of the kinetic coefficients (Table 4-148). During thermoanalytical investigations of oil shales, the reactions of the mineral matrix have to be considered. For example, any water of crystallization will be released in a temperature range between 75 and 150 "C depending upon the heating rate and the gas flow rate. The water which is bonded in the crystal lattice of clay or zeolite, requires temperatures as high as 300 "C for its release. An approximately equal temperature will be required to release the fifth water molecule from CuSO, . 5 H,O. Above temperatures of 550 OC, separation of carbon dioxide from carbonate minerals has to be taken into consideration. The reservoir matrix of Green River oil shale consists of varying amounts of nine minerals (according to [4-451) which are listed in Table 4-149. The TGA curves of a Green River oil shale and of the minerals Illite (Morris, Illinois USA) and Montmorillonite (Clay Spur, Wyoming USA) are given in Fig. 4-1 14. Illite and Montmorillonite have congruent curves in argon and in air. Naturally differences were found in the TGA curves of Green River oil shale both in argon and in air as a consequence of the oxidation of the organic substances. DSC (heating rate p = 10 K/min) in argon of Montmorillonite has a peak maximum of energy consumption at 136 "C. Above 550 "C the curve descends again but another maximum may not be recorded since the upper temperature limit of the instrument is 625 "C and it certainly lies in the temperature range above 650 "C. Illite exhibits three endothermic maxima at 102 'C, 372 OC, and 525 "C. The Green river oil shale also exhibits three endothermic maxima, at 82 "C, 455 OC, and 532 "C. The organic content of the Green River oil shale is reported to amount to 15.1 wt%. The Karl-Fischer water titration yields 6.8 wt% water in the air-dried sample. Similar titrations with Illite result in 2.8 wt% water and for Montmorillonite in 9.1 wt% water. From TGA, water contents of 3 wt% for Green River oil shale, about the same value for Illite, and of 8 wt% for Montmorillonite may be assumed. The weight loss of 5 wt% in the temperature Table 4-149: ,Mineral composition of Green River oil shale according to /4-45/ Dolomite Calcite Quartz Clays (Illite and Montmorillonite Orthoclase Plagioclase Zeolite Pyrite, Marcasite
CaMg(CO3)z CaCO, SiO, 5 0 x 3 4 0 , x 6Si0, x 2H20 Al2(0H),(Si4O,,,) x nHzO (Mg & Ca) KAlSi,O, NaAlSi,O, x CaAI$i,O, NaA1Si206x H20 FeS,
32-33 % 16-20 % 10-15 % 11-19 % 4- 6 % 10-12 % 1- 7 % 1- 3 %
4.6 Oil shale and shale oil
331
Fig. 4-114 Thermogravimetry of Oil Shales and Minerals Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Oil Shale Green River in Argon Curve 2: Oil Shale Green River in Air Curve 3: Montmorillonite (Clay Spur, Wyoming/USA) in Argon Curve 4: Illite (Morris, Illionois/USA) in Argon
range between 400°C and 800°C for Montmorillonite may be interpreted as a water release from the aluminum hydroxide (part of the sample, theoretically 5 wt% maximum), which attains its highest reaction rate between 600 "C and 700 "C temperature. It is possible that organic components of the Green River oil shale may have reacted with the iodine in the Karl-Fischer reagent, thus simulating a higher water concentration.
4.6.2 Modelling and simulation of oil shale pyrolysis The knowledge that oil shales contain kerogens, which are insoluble in organic solvents, and varying amounts of bitumens, which are soluble in toluene, is state-of-the-art [4-47, 4-48]. Pyrolysis of the kerogens and bitumens during retorting is a complex process, which comprises more than one subsequent and/or parallel reaction step and which cannot be described by assuming that only one first order reaction takes place. Investigations firstly on Jugoslavian oil shales and later on others [4-47 to 4-51], which contain different types
332
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-150: Composition of the oil shales (wt %) according to [4-47. 4-49]. Sample Aleksinac (A) Knjazevac (K) Korea (KOR) Estonia (E)
Mineral matrix
Organic substance
Kerogen
Bitumen
77.7 93.2 58.6 53.5
22.3 6.8 41.1 46.5
21.5 6.3 39.8 45.5
0.8 0.5 1.6 1.o
of kerogens and different total amounts of organic material (table 4-150), showed that thermogravimetry and DSC gave different values of the Arrhenius coefficients which appear in different temperature regions. Some pyrolysis kinetics were determined using DSC according to ASTM E 698-79. The mathematical procedures used in the determination of the TGA-derived kinetics correspond to the integral method according to Doyle [4-521 and Gorbachev [4-531. Assuming first order for the weight loss rate during TGA experiments at constant heating rate p :
p (da/dT) = A[exp (-EIRT)] . (1-a) where:
p
= heating rate
a: A E R T
= fractional weight loss = frequency factor = activation energy
= universal gas constant = Kelvin temperature
Eq. 4-5 (K min-') (dimensionless) (min-l) (kJ Mole-') (J Mole-' K-l) (K)
Integration of equation 4-5 using either approximations by series or partial integration gives: ln[-ln(l-a)/P] = ln[AR/P ( E + 2 R q ] - E/RT
Eq. 4-6
The Arrhenius coefficients, E and A , may be found by plotting In[-ln (l-a:)/P]versus 1/T. To validate of the methods, a series of original and modified samples from the oil shales listet in Table 4-150 were tested by thermoanalytical methods. The samples were designated as follows:
1. Oil shale (original) 2. Kerogen concentrate from No. 1 3. Bitumen (toluene extract from No. 1) 4. Bitumen" (toluene extract after heating up to 773 K of oil shale No. 1) 5. Extraction residue after heating up to 773 K of oil shale No. 1
Sample A (K, KOR, E) Sample A-K (K-K etc.) Sample A-B (K-B etc.) Sample A-B-773 (K-B-773 etc.) Sample A-773 (K-773 etc.)
4.6 Oil shale and shale oil
333
Table 4-151: Regions of temperature and conversion for first order reaction in thermogravimetric pyrolysis according to [4-47, 4-49]. Sample
Heating rate (K/mnin)
Temperature region (K)
Conversion region
A
10 5 2
A-K A-B A-B-773
10 5 2 10 10
A-B-773
5
A-773 K
10 10 5 10 5 2 10 10 20 10 5 20 10 5
633-753 613-753 593-733 593-733 593-753 593-733 573-753 573-673 693-813 573-673 693-813 633-773 613-873 593-873 613-8 13 593-813 633-873 733-873 733-853 673-773 653-753 633-733 653-873 653-873 613-673 713-813 613-693 713-873 653-753 653-753 633-713 673-753 673-753 653-733 613-833 633-713 733-813 613-713 733-813 673-753 653-773 653-733
1-59 1-64 1-65 1-41 1-42 1-52 15-71 2- 8 11-68 4-14 14-69 1-66 3-61 2-76 1-26 1-27 3-36 24-92 27-74 9-SO 7-45 6-43 30-72 34-82 35-46 55-72 37-51 51-82 7-33 10-43 7-39 10-78 12-90 9-85 34-84 51-69 69-86 40-64 75-87 9-65 8-62 9-68
K-K K-B K-B-773 KOR KOR-B-773
2 KOR-773 E
E-B-773
20 10 5 20 10 5 10
5 2 E-773
20 10 5
Total conversion 573-873 K
(%I 73 77 82 57 50 61 87 75 74 81 61 76 34 36 36 92 80 60 61 60 78 82 75 82 57 59 58 96 99 99 87 90 92 83 84 81
140
-
113 140
123 29.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
(a) First region 573 to 693 K (b) Second region 630 to 813 K
E-773
KOR-773 E E-B-773
A-773 K K-K K-B K-B-773 KOR KOR-B-773
(b)
A-B-773 (a)
A-K A-B
A
Heating rate (K/min) Sample
137
114 154 37.9
33.3 81.4 117.4 93.6 48.0 78.9 75.1 125 31.8
125.7 117.4 86.3 30.8
-
9.5478
-
-
7.0607 9.5478
7.8470 1.0934
-
65.8 18.8
-
-
52.7 16.4
-
-
-
133 64.0 21.4 127 150 41.2 23.7 136
-
39.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
55.2 46.6
-
-
-
-
33.0 55.8
96.7
-
102.6
2
88.3
113.0
5 Activation energy (kJ/Mol) 10
Table 4-152: Kinetic coeficients from thermogravimetry according to [4-47, 4-49]
9.0682
7.0170 10.6513 1.5185
0.5705 4.5302 7.4843 5.2330 1.6085 4.3096 3.8426 7.8774 0.9100
18.2014 7.6656 5.1584 1.1959
8.371 1 0.4099 -0,1530 0.8176 10.2480 1.6503 0.2201 8.9903
-
-
2.1703 1.2355
-
0.4843 2.4579
-
5.0934
7.0864
10 5 log A (min-')
0.2648 -0.5258
-
-2.1635 -0.9393
-
0.2967
-
-
-
-
-
5.5276
6.1367
2
2
2
P
3 5
P
2 A 2
s 2 a
ol
8 a .g.
s
E
8 cR?
3
2
3
A
P
w
w
4.6 Oil shale and shale oil
335
Table 4-153: Kinetic coefficients from DSC according to [4-47 , 4-49]. Sample
A ( < 773K) A ( > 773K) A-K ( < 773 K) A-K ( > 773 K) A-B-773 (623-873 K) K K-K E ( < 773K) E ( > 773K) E-B E-B-773 E-773 KOR KOR-B KOR-773
400
450
Activation energy (kJ/Mole)
log A (min-')
215 320 227 232 307 539 293 200 273 182 146 182 149 92.3 333
14.9895 20.68 12 15.7782 14.0414 21.8639 35.8621 18.6435 14.0253 17.3324 14.3304 10.4150 12.7513 9.7160 6.2833 23.0899
500
550
T
("C)
Fig. 4-115 Thermogravimetry of Oil Shale Aleksinac (STA 780) Heating Rate p: 5 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 30 + 20 cm3/min The TGA curve shows the weight change of that organic part of the sample which remains after heating up to 300 "C.
336
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
We evaluated regions of both temperatures and conversions from thermogravimetry where the reaction obeys first order kinetics (Table 4-151). The Arrhenius coefficients from TGA are listed in Table 4-152, those from DSC in Table 4-153. Fig. 4-1 15 shows the modification of the original TGA plot (Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer STA 780) of pyrolysis of the oil shale Aleksinac (sample A) in inert gas. The percentage weight change (ordinate) is calculated in relation to the organic material present in the oil shale after heating up to 300 "C (573 K) i. e. the maximum weight loss assumes an organic content of 22.3 wt%. The maximum weight loss occurs in the temperature range between 380 "C and 420 "C, but the peak maxima of DTG and DTA appear at considerable higher temperatures (520-530 "C). The DTA peak proves that this is an endothermal reaction. The bitumen from oil shale Aleksinac (sample A-B) has two regions of different slopes of the straight line in the plot In[-ln (l-a)]/P versus 1/T, which result in two different pairs of the Arrhenius coefficients, below and above 420 "C (693 K). The low values of E and log A for the region below 420 "C indicate that evaporation takes place. For the oil shale Knjaievac (sample K) the range of both temperature and conversion which obeys first order reaction is wider. This range is limited to 150 K for the oil shale Aleksinac (sample A) and to 100 K for the two oil shales Korea (sample KOR) and Estonia (sample E). Nevertheless 70 or 80 % of the conversion takes place in just this range of temperature. The thermally generated bitumens* also follow first order reactions in an ample range of temperature at least at higher heating rates fl Lower heating rates reveal two regions of different kinetic coefficients, the higher ones being in the higher temperature range. The oil shale from Estonia (sample E) has the highest conversion. This oil shale also supplies the highest activation energy in TGA. This holds also for the extraction residue from the sample which has been heated up to 773 K before extraction (sample E-773). The Arrhenius coefficients of the bitumens are generally lower than those of the corresponding oil shales. The values of E and log A from the DSC experiments considerably exceed those from TGA. The DSC pyrolysis of oil shale Aleksinac has two endothermal peak maxima. Depending upon the heating rates (p= 5, 10, 20 K/min) the first peak maxima appear at temperatures of 457 "C, 467 "C, and 477 OC,whereas the second peak maxima appears at 550 OC, 568 O C , and 583 "C. The kerogen concentrate sample A-K behaves in a similar €ashion, whereas the bitumen* A-B-773 exhibits only one maximum at temperatures of 448 "C, 454 OC, and 469 "C. may be interpreted as pyrolytic decomposition of the kerogen, since the foil and gases will be found in the temperature range from 350 "C up to 50 "C the heavy fractions formed during the pyrolytic decomposition of the kerogen, undergo coking. The activation energy E and the frequency factor logA of the pyrolysis of oil shale Knjaievac (sample K) have high values which cannot be explained. The oil shale Estonia :sample E) has two distinct peaks in the DSC curves, below and above 500 "C (773 K). 4fter several hours of pyrolysis at 550 "C (823 K) or above, an additional weight loss xcurs, indicating reactions of the mineral matrix of the oil shale. Therefore the activation
4.6 Oil shale and shale oil
337
energy of 273 kJ/Mol determined for the second peak should not be completely ascribed to pyrolysis of the organic substance. The significant differences between kinetic coefficients derived from TGA and DSC result in significant differences in the basic data obtained by these two methods. The relation ship between weight loss rates registered by TGA and energy flow rates measured by DSC can be clearly understood for a simple physical or chemical process, but with the complex pyrolysis process combined with the partial evaporation of liquids produced, the relations between heat absorption and weight loss are more complex, especially in the case of multicomponent systems. Considerable energy demand during kerogen + bitumen" decomposition in the first stage of oil shale pyrolysis is accompanied by only a small weight loss. The same holds for the final stage when pyrolysis of the heaviest intermediates takes place. Therefore DSCderived kinetics would appear to be more appropriate to describe those stages of the pyrolysis process where decomposition of the organic substances mainly leads to the formation of non-volatile products i. e. solids and very heavy liquids. This could be important when the DSC-and TGA-derived kinetics, obtained here using the first order kmetic model, are used as starting points for the construction of a more complex multi-step kinetic model of oil shale pyrolysis. Mathematical modelling and simulation of pyrolysis of powdered oil shale samples allows predictions to be made of different effects which are relevant to the subsequent modelling and design of the retorting process [4-48 to 4-5 11. The primary aim is to predict the total gas and oil evolution rates during isothermal and non-isothermal pyrolysis of powdered oil shale samples, i. e. under conditions at which the heat and mass transfer do not govern the overall pyrolysis rate. Although some positive results were obtained using a single-step model (SSM) in the simulation of pyrolysis of oil shale samples, this kmd of model was inadequate because it did not account for differences in the observed pyrolysis rates of kerogen and bitumen originally present in the oil shale; it gave poor simulation of the actual weight loss and energy consumption rates; and it gave poor simulation of isothermal pyrolysis. The change from the single-step to a two-step model (TSM) for the pyrolysis process amplified the range of applicability, but neither model gives a satisfactory description of this complex process. They can in practice only give a rough prediciton of the cumulative sample weight loss during non-isothermal pyrolysis. Therefore we attempted to simulate advanced pyrolysis using a multi-step model (MSM). This model was developed using TGA- and DSC-derived kinetic coefficients, determined for chemically and thermally treated oil shale samples by modelling particular reaction steps. The MSM is based on the reaction scheme shown in Fig. 4-116 which displays a series of parallel and consecutive first order reactions. and B denote the kerogen and bitumen originally present in the oil shale; B,, B,, and R, to R, are nonvolatilized intermediates and products (solids and liquids); P, to P5are volatilized products (gases and vapors); and& tof,,, are the stoichiometric coefficients that fulfil the condition:
338
4 Thermounalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
+
Fig. 4-116 Pattern of the Multistep Model for Pyrolysis of Oil Shale according to [4-491
As the intermediates and products were not physically or chemically characterized, their precise definitions are omitted to avoid introducing arbitrary terms. The reaction scheme reveals a similarity between intermediate B, and the bitumen in oil shale (B).Intermediate B, could be associated with bitumen generated by the thermal treatment of oil shale, which pyrolyses at lower temperatures in the same way as the bitumen originally present in oil shale. This is indicated by the almost identical activation energies obtained by TGA analysis. The kinetics of the reaction steps are represented by DSC-derived rate constants for oil shale samples (steps 1 and 2), and TGA-derived rate constants for bitumen samples (steps 3,4, and 5). The rate constant for the coking process (step 6) was taken from the literature. The stoichiometric coefficientsf, to&, were determined for each oil shale sample, giving cumulative effects which are in agreement with the experimentally determined conversions at particular temperature intervals. The coefficients for the coking process f9 andf,, were taken from the literature [4-561. The mathematical model of non-isothermal pyrolysis at a constant heating rate of p= dT/dt and based on the reaction scheme consists of the system of twelve equations 4-7 to 4-18 (Table 4-154). The start temperature is To= 573 K, while the start values of and B correspond to the weight fractions of kerogen and bitumen in the organic part of the oil shale sample. The initial values of all other components in the scheme are zero. The only exception is the initial P , value of 0.04 in the case of sample KOR, which corresponds to the fractional weight loss registered The process is simulated by solving equations 4-7 to 4-18 with a temperature increment of 0.5 K up to the final temperature of 873 K. The actual fractional weight loss values, necessary for the simulation of TGA curves, were calculated by equation 4-19: Eq. 4-19 where mo and m denote the initial and actual weights of the organic part of the sample.
4.6 Oil shale and shale oil
339
Table 4-154: Reaction equations of the non-isothermal pyrolysis according to [4-491. (4-7) (4-8) (4-9) (4-10) (4-1 1) (4-12) (4-13) (4-14) (4- 15) (4-16) (4-17) (4-18)
The same mathematical model is used for the simulation of DTG and DSC curves by numerical derivation according to equation 4-20: ‘weight loss = dKmo-
m)/m,I/dT
Eq. 4-20
The actual heat consumption rates, necessary for DSC simulation, were calculated by equation 4-2 1: 5 ‘heat consumphon
=
1 ‘iQ,
Eq. 4-21
The DSC simulation was only carried out to determine the position of the peaks on the DSC curve (peak maximum temperatures), so the corresponding heats of reaction (Q,) were taken from literature. The rate constants and the stoichiometric coefficients (k, andJ respectively) used in the simulation are given in Table 4-155. It is evident that the frequency factors and the activation energies of the DSC-derived constants k, and k2 exceed all the other kinetic coefficients shown in Table 4-155. The high activation energy of 539 kJ/Mol (Table 153) indicates the negligible influence of the heating rate on the temperature at which the maximum rate of heat consumption is registered by DSC analysis. Similar activation energies have been reported for pyrolysis of medium volatile bituminous coal. These values are intermediate between the energy needed for the linear single-bond scission (368 kJ/Mol for ethane) and the double-bond scission (720 kJ/Mol for ethylene). Generally high activation energy values are followed by high values of the corresponding frequency factors as a consequence of the mode of calculation. To illustrate the combined effects of the activation energy and frequency factor on the rate of the particular pyrolysis step, the k, values were calculated for the samples K and KOR at several temperatures in the region 723-823 K (450-550 “C). Comparison of the results demonstrates that at 723 K, k, for the sample K is two orders of magnitude lower than for sample KOR. This implies relatively slow production of the intermediate B2
2.00 x 1015 exp(-24100/T) 1.06 x 1014 exp(-24100/T) 44.7 exp(-4950/T) 44.7 exp(-4950/T) 44.7 exp(-4950/T) 3.00 x lo5 exp(-11000/T) 0.84 0.16 0.10 0.90 0.12 0.88 0.12 0.88 0.80 0.20
5.00 x 1013exp(-17900/T) 5.20 x lo9 exp(-17900/T) 80 exp(-383O/T) 8.13 exp(-3830/T) 8.13 exp(-383O/T) 3.00 x lo5 exp(-11000/T) 1 .oo 0.00 0.43 0.57 1.oo 0.00 0.45 0.55 1.oo 0.00
7.28 x 1039 exp(-64800/T) 7.28 x 1035exp(-648OO/T) 6.96 x lo3 exp(-9030/T) 2.04 x lo4 exp(-9490/T) 6.96 x lo3 exp(-9030/T) 3 . 0 0 ~lo5 exp(-11000/T) 0.91 0.09 0.7 0.30 0.90 0.10 0.10 0.90 0.80 0.20
1.50 x 1017 exp(-25900/T) 9.76 x 1014exp(-25900/T) 3.00 exp(-4000/T) 15.7 exp(-37OO/T) 3.72 exp(-4000/T) 3.00 x lo5 exp(-113OO/T) 0.93 0.07 0.40 0.60 0.90 0.10 0.03 0.70 0.80 0.20
k, (min-I) k, (min-1) k,(min-') k4(min-') k,( min-') k6(min-') f'(1) f 2 (1) f 3 (1) f4(1) fs (1) f 6 (l)
fg
(1) f,o(l)
f* (1)
f 7 (1)
E
KOR
K
A
Model Parameter
Table 4-155: Model parameters for the simulation of pyrolysis according to [4-491.
W
B
aF
"cr
5
6
2a
R
5a
$
3
"cr
3
5
5'
fs
B G.
R,
%
__
a 3 a
2
2
A
P 0
4.6 Oil shale and shale oil
341
during low temperature pyrolysis of sample K. At 773 K, & values for both samples are of the same order of magnitude, and at 823 K the k, value for sample K is one order of magnitude higher than for sample KOR. The sharp increase in the k2value for sample K, as a consequence of the higher activation energy, indicates that production of the intermediate B2 during non-isothermal pyrolysis of sample K could be expected to take place in a relatively narrow range of higher temperatures. The production of B, during pyrolysis of sample KOR could be expected to take place in a wider interval of intermediate temperatures. A similar relation holds in the case of pyrolysis step 1, i. e. in the case of k , values. However, the increased frequency factor values, as a result of the fitting procedure, indicate that pyrolysis step 1 is almost over before the second step occurs. In the case of samples KOR and E, the lunetics of reaction step 4 are represented by the same rate constant used for steps 3 and 5, i. e. by the rate constant obtained for thermally generated bitumen. This is because kinetic data were not available for the pyrolysis of bitumen originally present in these samples. It was assumed that this deviation from the standard modelling procedure would not change the simulation results significantly, because of the very similar pyrolysis kinetics of the two bitumens, from samples K and A. Good agreement is found between experimental and simulated curves in the case of sampIe E (Fig. 4-117), and only small differences between the curves for sample KOR (Fig. 4118), which validates the model for the prediction of weight loss of these oil shales during pyrolysis. The differences between experimental and simulated curves increase for sample
1
0.8 0
E -0.6 \
E I
00.4
E Y
0.2
0
600
650
700
750
800
€350
Temperature. K Fig. 4-117 Non-isothermal Pyrolysis of Estonian Oil Shale (Sample E) Heating Rate p: 5 K/min Experimental Curve Simulated Curve According to [4-491 ~
342
4 The~i?~ounulyti&ul Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products 1
0.8
E"
10.6 E I
00.4
-
E
v
0.2
-
---.-.-. 0
I " " I " " I " " I " " I " " I '
600
650
700
750
Temperature.
800
850
K
Fig. 4-118 Non-isothermal Pyrolysis of Korean Oil Shale (Sample KOR) Heating Rate p : 5 K/min -Experimental Curve - . - Simulated Curve According to [4-491
0.8 0
E"
\
-0.6 E I
00.4
E
v
0.2
-
0 600
650
700
800
750
Temperature,
850
K
Fig. 4-119 Non-isothermal Pyrolysis of Jugoslavian Oil Shale Knjaievac (Sample K) Heating Rate p: 10 K/min -Experimental Curve - . - Simulated Curve According to [4-491
4.6 Oil shale and shale oil
343
K (Fig. 4-1 19). This proves that the model is not suitable for all types of oil shales. Sample K has a relatively high bitumen content, and somewhat different behavior during pyrolysis, compared with samples E and KOR. Most of its organic substance is pyrolyzed at temperatures above 773 K (500 "C) whereas in the case of samples E and KOR and Aleksinac oil shale (sample A) most of the organic material is pyrolyzed at 673-773 K (400-500 "C). Observation of the volatile products leads to the conclusion that the first part of the pyrolysis process of sample E starts below 673 K (400 "C) and is governed by the kinetics of reaction step 1. The reaction rate constant k, determines the reaction in the temperature range from 673 to 733 K (400-460 "C), and applies partially until the final stage at 873 K (600 "C). The final period of pyrolysis (above 733 K = 460 "C) is controlled by reaction steps 3, 4, 5, and 6, as indicated by moderate increases in contributions of corresponding products. The same analysis for sample KOR gives similar results, indicating that the most important part of the pyrolysis process, occurring between 673-773 K (400-500 "C), is controlled by reaction step 2. In the case of sample K, the changes in product distribution are quite different, indicating reaction step 4 as the controlling step below 693 K (420 "C), and reaction step 1 as the controlling step from 713-733 K (440-460 "C). At higher temperatures (733-793 K = 460-520 "C) pyrolysis is controlled by reaction step 2 while the final pyrolysis period is controlled by step 5. These differences in pyrolysis behavior of the oil shales can be explained by structural differences in the corresponding kerogen types. The kerogens of oil shales Aleksinac, Estonia, and Korea are associated with type I, which is of predominantly paraffinic nature. Oil shale Knjaievac is associated with kerogen type 111, which is of predominantly aromatic nature. Thus the multi-step model appears to be suitable for simulating the pyrolysis of oil shales with kerogen type I, but cannot be properly adjusted for the other kerogen types. A rough estimation of reliability in predicting the actual weight loss rates (DTG) and heat consumption rates (DSC) was performed by comparing the peak maximum temperatures obtained experimentally with those obtained using equations 4-20 and 4-21, for the examples of oil shales E and KOR (Table 4-156). The difference of 4 % maximum between the experimental and the simulated data is acceptable. Table 4-156: Comparison between the experimental and simulated DSC and DTG curves acording to [4-491. Sample
Curve
E
DTG DSC
KOR
DTG DSC
Peak maximum temperatures (K) at different heating rates 5 K/min 10 K/min 20 K/min exp. sim. exp. sim. exp. sim. exp. sim.
788 793 794 803
713 713 712 713 721 743 785 753
72 1 725 721 725
803 813 805 823 738 763 811 778
740 743 749 743
816 833 825 843 756 788 833 803
344
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
The multi-step model was also tested for prediction of the effects of isothermal pyrolysis, which represents the retorting process. Isothermal TGA experiments were performed using powdered samples E and KOR. The experiments were carried out at 673,708,748, 773, and 794 K (sample E) and 723, 748, 773, and 794 K (sample KOR). Although a maximum heating rate was used to attain the pyrolysis temperature, a significant part of the sample was pyrolyzed in a non-isothermal regime, especially in the experiments performed at higher temperatures. Therfore, the simulation was performed in two steps. In the first step, non-isothermal pyrolysis was simulated at a maximum heating rate, by solving the equations 4-7 to 4-18. When the temperature of isothermal pyrolysis was reached, the simulation was continued at constant temperature by switching from temperature to time as independent variable in equations 4-7 to 4-18. This was done by replacing the constant heating rate term by dT/dt. The initial conditions for the second step of simulation were the final conditions of the first step. Comparison of the experimental and the simulated values (Fig. 4-120) for sample A shows good agreement at 708 K (435 "C) and a perfect agreement at 748 K (475 "C). The simulation of sample E does not agree well with experimental values: At both temperatures 708 K (435 "C) and 748 K (475 "C) the predicted fractional weight loss values are considerably higher than those obtained experimentally. At the end of the isothermal test time, the experimental data at 708 K are approximately 45 %, and at 748 K approximately 36 %, lower than the simulated values. For samples K and KOR there is a better fit between the simulation results and the experimental data.
2
6
a t,min
Fig.4-120 Isothermal Pyrolysis of Jugoslavian Oil Shale Aleksinac (Sample A) at 435 "C (708 K) and 475 "C (748 K) Curve l a and lb: Experimental Curves Curve 2a and 2b: Simulated Curves According to [4-491
4.6 Oil shale and shale oil
345
Modelling and simulation do not have to be limited to the pyrolysis of oil shales. Any pyrolysis process can be treated in similar manner, breaking it down into a series of consecutive and parallel reactions. The simulation will fit the real behavior so much the better, when as much information as possible is available on the original substances and intermediates. Fractions of similar chemical behavior from the original sample should therefore be characterized thermoanalytically and their reaction kinetics determined. Low and nonvolatile intermediates from the pyrolysis process should be isolated and their thermal behavior and reaction kinetics investigated.
4.6.3 Fingerprinting of oil shale by oxidation The DTG curve of oil shale in thermogravimetry in air exhibits several peak maxima at increasing temperatures similar to those of other organic substances. At a heating rate p= 10 K/min the first DTG maximum appears at approximately 250 "C and the last one generally above 450 "C. In the temperature interval between these limits up to five additional peak maxima appear depending on the origin of the oil shale and the type of kerogen. A similar behavior is observed during DSC experiments in air. The first (exotherm) peak maximum of both the DTG and DSC curves represents low temperature oxidaton (LTO). Its temperature depends on the type of kerogen in the oil shale. From modelling experiments we know that the LTO peak maximum temperatures of alkanes or other aliphatic hydrocarbons are lower than those of aromatics. The activation energies are also different. Thermogravimetric experiments on oxidation of oil shale in oxygen with kinetic evaluation according to Doyle and Gorbatchev [4-52, 4-53] resulted in considerably varied activation energies for the LTO region (Table 4-157). Generally the activation energies obtained from DSC experiments in air are considerably higher than those from experiments in oxygen. As usual the first peak (LTO) and the last one (fuel combustion) can be evaluated without difficulty, whereas the co-ordination of corresponding peaks from experiments with different heating rates in the interval can Table 4-157: LTO activation energy in oxygen of oil shale. TGA evaluation according to [4-571. Sample
Kerogen Type
Korea Aleksinac (Yugosl.) Aleksinac (Yugosl.) Creveny (France) Knjaievac (Yugosl.) Estonia
I I blend of I and I1 I1 blend of I1 and 111 -
E (kJ/Mol) 56.2 34-39 19-24 27-31 23-29 38.5
346
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-158: Activation energy of DSC oxidation in air of oil shale LTO 250-350 "C E (kJ/Mol)
Fuel Deposition 350-450 "C E (kJ/Mol)
192.6
165.1
144
144
289
134.5
163.7
265.2
45.5
138.6
423.5
Goyniik (Turky) Kerogen type I
132.8
177.6
375.8
Goyniik (Turky) Kerogen concentrate Kerogen type I
124.0
174.5
Sample
Aleksinac (Yugosl.) Sample A Kerogen type I Aleksinac (Yugosl.) Sample A 132 Kerogen types I and I1 Aleksinac (Yugosl.) Kerogene concentrate Kerogen type I Knjaievac (Yugosl.) Kerogen concentrate Kerogen types II and I11
. - . --.
Fuel Combustion > 450°C E (kJ/Mol)
-.
75
50
25
5
10
Fig. 4-121 Isothermal Thermogravimetry of Kerogen Concentrate Aleksinac (Kerogen Type I) at Different Temperatures Atmosphere: Air 25 cm3/min Mass Loss versus Residence Time
15
4.6 Oil shale and shale oil
347
only be done by trial and error. The results of DSC lunetics are listed in Table 4-158. Unfortunately there are not enough data to support any firm statement, but it does seem possible to differentiate the kerogen types using thermoanalytical methods. Isothermal gravimetry at different temperatures did not give very useful results for this purpose. Isothermal gravimetry experiments were performed at final temperatures between 300 "C and 470 "C in air (flow rate 25 cm3/min) using a heating rate p= 100 K/min. This implies that non-isothermal gravimetry occurs for nearly five minutes in the case of the highest final temperature of 470 "C. Fig. 4-121 demonstrates the behavior of kerogen concentrate from Aleksinac oil shale (kerogen type I); Fig. 4-122 for kerogen concentrate from Knjaievac oil shale (blend of kerogen types I1 and 111). Most weight is lost during the heating up to final temperature. All curves in the plot of conversion versus time become asymptotic after, at most, 10 minutes test time, when all of the organic material has been oxidized to volatile products. This holds especially for the low temperature experiments. At around 350 "C the conversion behavior of the samples Aleksinac and Knjaievac differs. Similar oxidation behavior has already been observed for coronene (Fig. 3-31) and for asphaltenes isolated from bitumen (Fig. 4-123).
75
50
25
Fig.4-122 Isothermal Thermogravimetry of Kerogen Concentrate Knjaievac (Kerogen Type I1 and Type 111) Atmosphere: Air 25 cm3/min Mass Loss versus Residence Time
348
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
N9"C Air
5
10
15 Timelmirtl
Fig. 4-123 Isothermal Thermogravimetry of Asphaltenes from Bitumen B80 (Venezuela) Gas Flow Rate: 25 crn3/min Mass Loss versus Residence Time Parameter: Oven Temperature, Nature of Gas
4.7 Lubricants Lubricants, especially lubrication oils for Otto or Diesel and for jet engines, are exposed to high temperatures in inert and in oxidizing atmospheres during use. They may suffer losses by evaporation and also loss or alteration due to cracking and oxidation reactions. High duty lubricants contain additives, which inhibit early aging, and additives which alter the temperature-viscosity behavior. Papers appear quite early in the literature, which deal with the aging of lubrication oils, and also with the dependence of the low temperature behavior on oil composition and the influence of additives [4-58 to 4-80]. The literature reflects progress in lubricant development and development of thermoanalytical methods of investigation. Difficulties in the development of test methods which have practical relevance and which are able to simulate long term behavior are highlighted. Thermogravimetry, differential thermoanalysis, and differential scanning calorimetry are used as test instruments. Most of the papers describe simulation of the evaporation behavior and try to establish selected values or index numbers from the thermoanalysis as relevant to aging and oxidation stability. The aging behavior is usually described by TGA onset temperatures, and by onset and peak maximum temperatures of DTG, DTA, and DSC curves. Only one publication [4-631 deals with the attempt to ascertain the reaction kinetics of oxidation using the calculation of reaction rates and half life times from the reaction heat, dHldt. Moreover, some of the papers refer to testing of wax content, glass temperatures, and cloud points, but most of the publications describe only the evaporation behavior of lubricants.
4.7 Lubricants
349
4.7.1 Evaporation behavior of lubrication oils We shall consider the practical relevance of the Noack test of evaporation loss (DIN 51 581). An oil sample is held at 250 "C for 60 minutes in a defined flow of air, and weighed before and after this procedure. We cannot say whether the weight loss is based only on evaporation of parts of the original sample, or whether parts of the sample have been oxidized and then evaporated. The repeatability is f 5 % and the reproducibility k 10 %, each for the mean value. ASTM D 972-86 and IP 183/79 use an instrument of different geometric construction and permit a free choice of temperature between 99 "C and 150 "C. An air flow of 2 l/min is applied and the test time is 22 h. The main difference of the ASTM 2595-85 lies in the extension of the temperature range from 99 "C to 316 "C. A reproducibility of & 15 % is quoted for these methods. Blends of standard lubrication oils have been produced for a systematic investigation of the application of thermal methods of analysis. Starting from four vacuum distillates (samples FVAl-FVA4), seven base oils were blended (samples MI-MVII). The subsequent addition of 8 wt% of a performance additive package (Orogil XOA 560, Orogil Table 4-159: Viscosity of Vacuum Distillates (mm2/s) Sample
at 40 "C
at 100°C
VI
FVA 1 FVA2 FVA3 FVA4
16.26 29.52 95.98 483.55
3.54 5.07 10.69 31.15
94 94 94 94
VI = Viscosity Index
Table 4-160: Composition and Viscosity of Base Oils. Sample
FVANo.
wt %
~
MI MI1 MI11 MIV MV MVI MVII
at 40 "C
Viscosity at 100 "C
(mm2/S)
(mm2/S)
~
1 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 4 3 4 3 4
35 65 76 24 40 60 15 85 90 10 34 66 48 52
~
at -17.8 "C (mPa. s) ~
24.32
4.54
920
39.94
6.14
2400
59.50
7.89
4850
79.54
9.41
9000
110.64
11.66
15000
161.77
15.08
200.06
17.32
350
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Company) to each, provides seven single grade oils with SAE specifications from 1OW to 50W (samples 01-07). A further addition of a methacrylate-based viscosity improver, G 545, to the single grade oil (samples 01 and 02) gave the multigrade oils of SAE specifications 1OW-30, 1OW-40, 15W-30, and 15W-50 (samples 08-01 1). The composition of the blends and their characteristic values are listed in Tables 4-159 to 4-162. The element analysis and the average relative particle weight (@ of the vacuum distillates are given in Table 4-163. Table 4-164 shows the structural group analysis according to Oelert [4-111, which shows predominantly aliphatic structures (approx. 50 %) and naphthenic as well as aromatic structures in equal parts (one quarter each). The structural composition and the viscosities of the base oils MI-MVII can be composed additively from the corresponding data of the vacuum distillates. As expected the viscosity depends on the molecular size and has linear correlations with the molecular weight, the sum of the carbon atoms, ZC, and the maximum of the carbon chain length of the paraffinic molecule part, KLMAX. Thermogravimetry in inert gas of the vacuum distillates and base oils shows that the molecule size governs the evaporation behavior. The evaporation start temperatues T1 % and T5 % are linear functions of the average molecular weight M (Fig. 4-124) and of the chain length of the paraffinic molecule part, KLMAX (Fig. 4-125). Also, the peak maximum temperature T,, of the DTG increases linearly with increasing molecular weight (Fig. 4-126) whereas the evaporation rate decreases (Fig. 4-127). There is a clear linear
a,
Table 4-161: Viscosity and SAE Specification of Single Grade Oils. Sample
(mm2/S)
Viscosity 100 "C (mm2/s)
28.25 44.15 66.15 87.98 121.64 168.49 213.52
5.09 6.77 8.65 10.22 12.63 15.72 12.28
40 "C 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
VI
SAE Specification
114 107 102 98 95 95 95
1ow 20w 20w 20W-30 30W 40W 40W
-17.8 "C (mPa. s) 980 2600 5400 8700 20000 -
Table 4-162: Composition, Viscosity and SAE Specification of Multi Grade Oils Single Grade Oil
Multi Grade Oil
01 01 02 02
08 09 010 01 1
G 545 (wt %)
40°C (mm3/s)
Viscosity 100°C (mm2/s)
-17.8"C (mPa. s)
8.0 16.0 8.0 16.0
48.17 85.39 72.86 123.02
9.45 16.15 11.96 20.06
1350 2120 3350 4650
VI
SAE Specification
184 204 161 187
1OW-30 1OW-40 15W-30 15W-50
351
4.7 Lubricants
Table 4-163: Elemental Analysis (wt %) and Average Molecular Weight of Vacuum Distillates. -
FVA 1 FVA2 FVA3 FVA4
C
H
N
S
H/C
M
86.37 86.11 86.09 85.82
13.39 13.41 13.36 13.12
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
0.45 0.39 0.39 1.34
1.86 1.87 1.86 1.83
345 398 526 718
Table 4-164: Structure Group Analysis of Vacuum Distillates.
No. of C-Atoms ZC No. of H-Atoms ZH Aromatic Carbon CA Naphthenic Carbon CN Paraffinic Carbon CP No. of Aromatic Rings RA No. of Naphth.Rings RN Aromacity Max. Chain Length of the Paraffinic Part KLMAX
FVA1
FVA2
FVA3
FVA4
24.81 45.83 24.13 24.76 51.11 0.44 1.12 0.107
28.53 53.03 19.63 26.78 53.58 0.41 1.39 0.085
37.70 69.72 18.62 25.09 56.28 0.53 1.72 0.084
51.36 93.45 23.69 17.07 59.24 0.99 1.59 0.1 16
5.89
7.95
10.65
16.28
- 300 u
0 d
s I n +
250
200
150
400
600
800
R Fig. 4-124 Vaporization Start Temperature T5 % of Vacuum Distillates (FVA1 - FVA4) and Base Oils (MI - MVII) versus Mean Molecular Weight.
352
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
5
10
15 CLMAX
Fig. 4-125 Vaporization Start Temperature T5 % of Vacuum Distillates (FVA1 - FVA4) and Base Oils (MI - MVII) versus Chain Length KLMAX of the Paraffinic Part of the Molecule.
0
I
I
Fig. 4-126 DTG Maximum Temperature T,, of Vacuum Distillates (ETA1 - FVA4) and Base Oils (MI - MVII) versus Mean Molecular Weight
4.7 Lubricants
-
353
1 5 .O
E
. .r
E
-
12.5
69
a I-
n
10.0
7 -5
200
400
600
m
Fig.4-127 Maximum of Loss Rate DTG of Vacuum Distillates (FVA1 - FVA4) and Base Oils (MI MVII) versus Mean Molecular Weight
correlation of the DTG maximum temperature Tmxwith the chain length KLMAX. For the weight loss rates, DTG, such a correlation cannot be clearly proved (Table 4-165). Thermogravimetry in air of the vacuum distillates is no different to that in argon for temperatures up to 200 "C (Table 4-166). Above 200 "C the curve of the TGA in air is shifted to higher temperatures as shown by the value of AG300. Low-volatile oxidation products are probably present. Of some interest is the question whether the Noack evaporation loss test could be replaced by isothermal gravimetry. In contrast to the Noack test, which only delivers one value after one hour test time, the weight loss versus the test time is recorded by the thermobalance. The important information is whether the evaporation has already reached its final stage. But there is a significant difference in the ratios of surface to volume S : V between the cup of the Noack tester and the pan of the thermobalance (Stanton-Redcroft TG 750): Noack Tester S : V = 0.028 (m-') Thermobalance S : V = 2.0 (mm-') There is a higher weight loss in the thermobalance experiment than in the Noack test, even at equal test times and temperatures because of this. Therefore the temperature in the thermobalance was reduced to 200 'C, and a heating rate p= 100 K/min was applied in order to attain the final isothermal temperature as rapidly as possible. The gas flow rate had the standard value of 25 cm3/min. The results of the Noack test are listed in Table 4-167, those of isothermal gravimetry in Table 4-168. Since it was difficult to establish an exact final temperature in the TG 750, the correct final temperatures are also listed in Table 4-168. Repeated tests showed that the temperature remained within k 0.57 % of the mean during the 90 minutes test time. Comparison between tables 4-167 and 4-168 shows that the losses from the light oils (samples 01, 02, 08-011) in the thermobalance after 10
274 265
0 0.2
25.0 10.0 1.7 0.5 27.5 11.0 2.1 1.o 0.6
FVAl FVA2 FVA3 FVA4
Sample
162 190 215 278
("Cj
("C)
133 157 180 243
T5 %
T1 %
87.8 85.3 30.0 11.3
(%I
(%I 27.0 8.5 3.7 0
AG 300 "C
200 "C
15.3 13.0
99.0 93.8 62.5 10.0 91.0 91.4 81.0 20.3 16.6
(%I
(%I
AG
300 "C
200 "c
Table 4-166: Thermogravimetry of Vacuum Distillates p = 10 K/min; Air 25 cm3/min
227 225
MVI MVII
153 186 238 278 160 181 194 226 26 1
("C)
("C)
131 153 190 227 121 154 160 177 215
T5 %
TI %
FVAl FVA2 FVA3 FVA4 MI MU MI11 MIV MV
Sample
Table 4-165: Thermogravimetry of Vacuum Distillates and Base Oils. p = 10 K/min; Argon 25 cm3/min
77.5 70.0
100 100 94.7 74.5 99.0 96.6 94.5 92.4 94.0
(%I
400 "C
~~
(%/minj 14.29 14.98 16.41 13.50
99.0 95.6 86.1 69.5
DTG
223 256 300 396 235 257 286 350 346 367 370 362
("C)
(%I
400 "C
13.32 11.33 14.27 9.42 12.48 11.87 9.79 9.47 12.11 13.24 8.38 6.95
(%/min)
DTG
234 265 325 334
("C)
597 735 921 0 0 3.0
453 530 596 537
("CI
TEnd
312 399 566 1000 475 527 518 828 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5
2
0
F
a
+u
3
P
8&-
El
a a
0
A
P
w
4.7 Lubricants
355
Table 4-167: Evaporation Loss in the Noack Test (DIN 51 581) Sample
Loss (wt %)
Single Grade Oils
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
26.3 16.6 12.0 8.1 5.7 5.0 4.7
Multi Grade Oils
08 09 010 01 1 XOA 560
27.1 24.1 16.6 15.6 24.5
minutes test time, are greater than those at the end of the corresponding Noack test by a factor of 1.5-1.7. The lower volatile oils (samples 03-07) show losses after 10 minutes at 200 "C in the thermobalance, which are similar to those at the end of the Noack test. The plot of weight loss versus test time shows a final stage after only 30 minutes test time for the light oils (samples 01, 02). The other five oils (samples 02-07) did not even reach this stage after 90 minutes (Fig. 4-128). A similar plot for the multigrade oils (sample 08-01 1) shows that a decrease of the evaporation losses occurs as a consequence of the addition of the VI-improver G545 to the single grade oils (samples 01 and 02). This is not so clearly evident in the Noack test. The VI-improver G545 itself loses nearly half of its weight during the test in the thermobalance, since a light oil acts as solvent for the methacrylate polymer. All the samples were tested by isothermal gravimetry in air in order to assess whether the evaporation losses of the additive-treated lubricants could be calculated from the losses of the basic components (Table 4-169). Samples FVA1, FVA2, and FVA3 reach a final value after only 30 minutes test time; the others did not reach this stage, even after 90 minutes. Theoretical evaporation losses were calculated for the additive-treated lubrication oils using the data from the basic compounds (Table 4-170). Comparison between Table 4-168 and Table 4-170 shows that the components of a blended lubrication oil influence one another in such a manner that precise prediction is impossible, and only approximate values of their evaporation losses can be given. Both tests have practical relevance since both kinds of evaporation take place in the oil sump of an automotive engine. The circulating oil passes over plane surfaces where it undergoes thin layer evaporation similar to that in the thermobalance. On the other hand the oil accumulated in the sump has a ratio of surface to volumen similar to that in the cup of the Noack tester.
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0 10 01 1
Sample
198.5 199.0 200.5 198.5 198.0 197.5 198.5 198.0 198.0 197.0 197.5
T ("C)
10 min
45.0 36.0 12.5 8.0 4.2 4.8 7.3 45.0 37.6 32.0 23.6
AG (wt %> 199.0 198.5 200.5 198.0 198.5 197.0 198.0 197.5 198.5 197.0 197.5
T ("C)
30 m n
85.0 67.7 30.6 17.6 8.5 8.6 11.8 75.6 66.5 59.6 48.0
AG (wt %)
Table 4-168: Evaporation Loss in the Isothermal Gravimetry in Air at 200 "C. Single and Multi Grade Oils
199.5 198.5 200.5 198.0 199.0 197.5 198.5 198.0 198.5 196.5 197.5
T ("C)
60 min
91.0 79.8 46.4 28.8 14.0 12.8 18.2 86.6 80.0 73.8 63.6
AG (wt %)
198.6 198.5 200.5 198.5 199.0 197.5 198.0 197.5 198.5 196.5 197.5
T ("C)
90 min
92.7 82.0 57.0 38.0 17.0 17.2 22.0 88.8 84.4 79.0 70
AG (wt %)
A
8E:
i l
a
%
5
aiF
z2
pa
h
2
g. 2 9
n
G'
%
3
k
n
3
82
h
3
FVA 1 FVA2 FVA3 FVA4 XOA 560 G 545 MI MII MI11 MIV MV MVI MI1
Sample
198.0 197.4 199.0 199.0 199.5 199.4 197.0 198.0 199.0 198.0 198.0 198.0 199.1
T ("C)
10 inin
56.0 38.0 4.2 1.0 31.3 24.4 50.1 26.3 16.6 4.9 3.9 3.2 3.9
AG (wt %)
198.0 197.5 198.5 199.0 200.0 199.0 197.0 198.0 199.0 198.0 198.0 197.8 201.0
T ("C)
30 min
87.2 81.9 15.3 3.4 44.5 41.5 84.0 67.7 47.4 22.0 16.2 12.1 11.8
AG (wt %)
Table 4-169: Evaporation Loss in the Isothermal Gravimetry in Air at 200 "C. Vaccum Distillates, Base Oils, and Additives.
197.5 197.5 198.5 199.0 200.0 198.0 197.0 197.0 198.5 198.0 198.0 197.8 201.0
T ("C)
60 min
89.0 85.9 31.0 5.3 51.2 51.6 87.1 77.2 62.8 39.8 31.8 23.1 19.5
AG (wt %)
197.4 197.4 198.5 199.0 200.5 198.0 197.0 197.0 198.0 198.0 198.5 197.8 201.0
T ("C)
90 min
90.1 87.1 42.0 8.0 53.4 56.7 88.2 80.9 69.7 49.9 42.0 30.8 25.3
AG (wt %)
u
-a
358
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
01
02
03 04 05
06
07
I i
Fig. 4-128 Isothermal Thermogravimetry of Single Grade Oils (01 - 07) at 200 "C in Air (25 cm3/min)
Table 4-170: Calculated Evaporation Loss of Additive-treated Oils (wt %). Sample No.
10 min
30 min
60 min
90 min
Single Grade Oils
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
43.3 30.0 18.8 11.0 6.1 5.4 5.0
80.6 70.5 42.1 26.8 16.5 13.9 12.4
84.1 71.0 52.8 40.2 30.3 24.6 21.3
85.4 74.5 59.5 49.1 39.8 32.3 21.9
Multi Grade Oils
08 09 010 01 1
41.8 40.2 29.6 29.1
77.5 74.4 62.4 60.1
81.5 78.9 69.4 67.9
83.1 80.8 73.0 71.6
4.7.2 Oxidation behavior of lubrication oils Testing the oxidation behavior of low boiling lubrication oils does not give satisfactory results, because losses caused by evaporation of parts of the original sample and oxidation products can occur in the same temperature region. Comparison of the TGA curves in argon and air shows that they agree up to a temperature of approximately 200 O C , and thereafter diverge. The formation of low-boiling high-volatile oxidation products shifts the TGA curve towards lower temperatures, whereas formation of low-volatile oxidation products causes a shift towards higher temperatures. Thus the temperature at which the TGA curve in argon first deviates from the curve in air does not always represent the start L
4.7 Lubricants
359
Table 4-171: Start of Oxidation from TGA Experiments.
FVAl FVA2 FVA3 FVA4
240 280 320 310
of the oxidation reaction, as sometimes postulated in the literature. The start temperature of the vacuum distillates (samples FVAl to FVA4)derived from TGA is listed in Table 4-171. But before changes in weight energy effects occur in this method, so measurement by DSC in air at 100 psi (7bar) pressure was proposed by Noel [4-601. The increase of pressure increases the evaporation temperature and decreases the start of oxidation. This method avoids overlap of the endothermal evaporation and the exothermal oxidation in most cases. The oxidation in air at 7 bar pressure of petroleum lubrication oils, polyalphaolefins, and ester lubricants gives diagrams of DSC which display only two distinct peaks, as shown schematically in Fig. 4-129.The curve in the plot of energy flow versus temperature starts with a weak descent. The oxidation starts at temperatures above 150 OC, marked by the temperature TBor by the onset temperature at point A of Fig. 4-129.A first peak maximum occurs between 250 and 320 "C (point B), then the curve descends towards a minimum
H [pwl ex0
I
endo
I
I 100
I
I
2w
I
I
I
3w
4cG
I
I Mx)
I
T["Cl
Fig. 4-129 Pattern of the DSC Recorder Graph of Lubricating Oils Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air, Pressure 7 bar, Flow rate 5 cm3/min TB: Reaction Start Temperature A : Onset Point Temperature B : Maximum Temperature of Peak 1 C : Temperature of Minimum 1 D : Maximum Temperature of Peak 2 E : Temperature of Reaction End
360
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
between 370 and 410 "C (point C). The first peak represents the energies of two oxidation reaction steps i. e. low temperature oxidation, LTO, and fuel deposition. These results are from the DuPont 990 Thermoanalyzer. We report later that measurement with the more sensitive DuPont 9900 Thermoanalyzer provides separation into at least three peaks. This phenomenon is proved by terminating the test at the temperature of the minimum (point C), when the sample pan no longer contains liquids, but a brownish-black lacquer: the 'deposited fuel' which is also found on the pistons of an engine. Sometimes the reaction step of fuel deposition is revealed as a more or less pronounced shoulder on the descending flank of the first peak. If the test is continued beyond the point C, then a second peak appears at approximately 480 "C (point D) and the curve descends thereafter to the base line (point E). The second peak is a typical combustion peak, which represents the heat of combustion of amorphous carbon (30-32 Hlg) when the energy release in this peak is related to the weight still present at point C. This value is quite independent of the type of oil sample, as is the temperature of the second peak maximum. Therefore, the oxidation stability of the sample, can be defined by the first peak. The literature suggests the following data as empirical values indicating the oxidation stability (Fig. 4-129): - Oxidation start temperature as marked by the temperature TB or the onset point A - Temperature of the first peak maximum T-, (point B) - The ratio FV (in %) of the area AGH of peak 1 up to an empirically fixed temperature
(for example 250 "C) FZsodivided by the total area of peak 1 Fpeakl: FV= F250 100 % Fpeakl Indicators for high oxidation stability are: - a high temperature of the onset (point - a high start temperature TB - a small value of the ratio FV
A)
Evaluation of the oxidation tests on the vacuum distillates showns an increasing oxidation start temperature T, (point A) and also an increasing maximum temperature of the first peak Tml as a consequence of the rise of the sity (Fig. 4-130,4-131). The corresponding temperatures for the performance ad XOA560 are similar to those of the high-viscous vacuum distillates, whe rresponding temperatures of the VIimprover G545 are compatible to those of the low-viscous vacuum distillates. The results of the area ratios, FV, are also similar (Fig. 4-132). Blending the four vacuum distillates to the seven base oils leads to a standardization of the oxidation start temperatures, TBto a mean X = 243.4 "C ( k V = 1.70 %). The maximum temperatures of the first oxidation peak were also increased and standardized when the performance additive XOA 560 was used, but not to the same extent as the reaction start temperature (Fig. 4-133). The influence of the performance additive may be observed more explicitly by examining the area ratio FV (Fig. 4-134). Addition of the VI-improver G545 gives unsystematic results for the oxidation stability of the multigrade oils, which sometimes rises and sometimes falls.
4.7 Lubricants
7
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FVA 1
I
N A2
-
I
361
NA 3
1
NA4
I
1
XOA 560
I
G 545
Fig. 4-130 DSC Oxidation of Vacuum Distillates and Additives Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air, Pressure 7 bar, Flow Rate 5 cm3/inin Reaction Start Temperature TB
FVA 1
J
FVA 2 M A3 M A4
I I
I XOA 560
Fig. 4-131 DSC Oxidation of Vacuum Distillates and Additives Heating Rate p : 10 Kimin Atmosphere: Air, Pressure 7 bar, Flow Rate 5 cm3/min Maximum Temperature of Peak 1
362
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
N
[$I 3
I
FVA 1 N A2
I
FVA3
I
NA4
~~~~
~
Fig. 4-132 DSC Oxidation of Vacuum Distillates and Additives Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air, Pressure 7 bar, Flow Rate 5 cm3/min Area Ratio FV
Base and s i n g l e grade o i l s
Fig. 4-133 DSC Oxidation of Base Oils and Doped Oils Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air, Pressure 7 bar, Flow Rate 5 cm3/min ' Maximum Temperature of Peak 1
Mu1 ti grade oi 1 s
363
4.7 Lubricants
-
15 Base and s i n g l e grade o i l s
k d
Il u l ti grade o i 1 s
2
10
5
i
1 fln .J
Fig. 4-134 DSC Oxidation of Base Oils and Doped Oils Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air, Pressure 7 bar, Flow Rate 5 cm3/min Area Ratio FV
Table 4-172:DSC Oxidation in Air, Temperature of the Second Peakmaximum Tm2 Substance
XOA 560 G 545 Vacuum distillates FVA1-FVA4 and Base oils MI-MVII Additive-treated Oils Sample 01-0111
T-~("C)
Coefficient of Variation +V (%)
370 484 479.9
-
1.3
478.7
2.2
-
The maximum temperature of peak 2 is independent of the viscosity of the oils and their additive treatment, and this is shown in the statistical evaluation (Table 4-172). As expected, the temperatures which characterize the start of the oxidation (TB,Ton,,,, and Tm,.) are lower in the experiments at increased pressure than at normal pressure. This gives a more realistic simulation of conditions of pressure loading in an engine. Determination of the oxidation kinetics is a more exact method in the physical sense but it takes rather more time. Evaluation may be restricted to the first oxidation peak. Comparative experiments on the base oil MIII and the single grade oil SAE 20W (sample 03) show no significant differences between the activation energies nor between the frequency factors:
364
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Sample Base oil MI11 Single grade oil Sample 03
First oxidation peak E (kJ/Mol) log A (min-') 99.43
9.538
94.14
8.457
13 ("C) 200
250
300-
Fig. 4-135 DSC Oxidation Half Life Time of the First Oxidation Peak (LTO) versus Temperature Line 1: Base Oil MI11 Line 2 Single Grade Oil SAE 20W No. 03
4.7 Lubricants
365
The half life times t1,2calculated using the coefficients above have nearly equal slopes in the diagram of log t1,2versus 1 OOO/T, but the line of the additive-treated single grade oil 03 has been shifted towards higher temperatures (Fig. 4-135). Thus the half life time at equal temperatures of the latter is increased by approximately half a power of ten. Comparison between the area ratios, FV, of the two samples also shows an increase in the oxidation stability of the additive-treated sample, as shown by the quotient FV,, : FVMIn=0.11. The other samples do not show such good agreement of half life times and area ratios. We have shown that the relationship between empirical index numbers is in quite good accordance with the relationship between exactly defined physical values.
4.7.3 Comparison of the oxidation stability of virgin oils, reclaimed oils, and synthetic lubrication oils. The test method for oxidation stability, DIN 51 780 determines the oxygen absorption at a constant elevated temperature as a function of time (it is equivalent to ASTM D 525-86 and IP 40/92, Oxidation stability of gasoline; Induction period method). It is unusual to use this method for lubricants but it is very sensitive. The test records the decrease of oxygen pressure, starting from 7 bar, at 100 "C over 7 days. The oils under this investigation did not experience any measurable drop in pressure. In compensation infrared spectroscopy of the aged samples no new carbonyl or carboxyl frequencies appeared and those already present in the original samples were not reinforced. Therefore we attempted to use thermoanalytical methods for this investigation. The samples for investigation were: two virgin lubrication oils of SAE specification 10W (samples E1.O and E2.0) and SAE 30 (sample E3.0 and E4.0); reclaimed lubrication oils of identical SAE specifications (R1.O, R2.0, R3.0, and R4.0) (Table 4-173); three synthetic lubricants: polyalphaolefin (PA0 5.0); a trimethylol propane ester of short chain Table 4-173: Viscosity and Molecular Weight of Virgin Oils and Reclaimed Oils. Sample No.
Viscosity
VI
SAE Specification
Average Molecular Weight
104 98 93 93 99 109 102 104
low low
400 378 537 529 362 392 509 488
(mm2/S)
E l .O E2.0 E3.0 E4.0 R1.O R2.0 R3.0 R4.0
at 40 "C
at 100 "C
23.59 23.80 110.44 104.06
4.52 4.48 11.71 11.28
25.45 38.20 97.60 80.25
4.67 6.19 11.32 9.98
30 30
low low 30 30
366
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-174: Physical Data of Synthetic Lubricants (Suppliers data).
Density at 20 "C (g/cm3) Neutralization Number (mg KOH/g) Base Number (mg KOH/g) Pour Point ("C) Flash Point ("C) Oxide Ash (wt %) Oxidation Start Temperature ("C) Average Molecular; Weight (g/Mole)* Viscosity at 40 "C (mm/s)* at 100 ' (mm/s)* Viscosity Index*
PA0
TMP
DITDA
XOA 626
0.823 0.01
0.949 0.2 4 -53 240
0.912 0.2 4 -52 250
0.99 (15 "C)
-
-60 222 -
-
-
203 439 22.7 4.8 133
210 48 1 17.8 4.1 139
197 475 26.6 5.3 138
-
86 -
208 12.1 -
1500 70.2 103
~~
*
Measurements : German Petroleum Institute
fatty acids (TMP 6.0); and di-iso-tridecyladipate (DITDA 7.0). The characteristicphysical properties of these products are listed in Table 4-174. The experiments were performed on lubricants without any additive (second digit .O), with 5 wt% additive (second digit .1), and with 11.1 wt% additive (second digit .2). The additive used in these experiments is an additive package for diesel engine oils XOA 626 (Orogil Company). The supplier recommends a concentration of 11.1 wt% of the additive package. The physical characteristicsof XOA 626 are also listed in Table 4-174. According to the suppliers specifications XOA contains 36.2 wt % petroleum based oil and the following elements (wt%): Calcium Phosphorous Zinc Sulfur Nitrogen
3.2 0.8 0.9 3.1 0.48
Thus the main component must be a zinc dithiophosphateacting as antioxidant.Thennogravimetry of XOA (Fig. 4-136) demonstrates low evaporation start temperatures (T1 % = 110 "C, T5 % = 198 "C). Up to a temperature of 250 "C approximately 36 wt% is evaporated. Pyrolysis of the residual components takes place in a temperature region from 300 to 525 "C. The residue at 800 "C amounts to 13 wt%. The experiment in air yields 11.5 wt% ash (inorganic substances). The results of thermogravimetry in argon of the petroleum based lubrication oils without any additive are listed in Table 4-175; those in air in table 4-176. The thermogravimetry of the synthetic lubricants on samples with and without any additives both in argon and in air is shown in Tables 4-177 and 4-178. The oxidation start temperatures, determined by comparisqn of the TGA curves in argon and air, are listed in Table 4-179. The additivetreatment 'shifted the TOxtowards higher temperatures. The values for the synthetics without any additive tabulated here are higher than the values in the suppliers specifications(Table 4-174).
4.7 Lubricants
f
361
Residue ( % )
Fig. 4-136 Thermogravimetry of the Additive Package XOA 626 Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min
Table 4-175: Thermogravimetry of Virgin Oils and Reclaimed Oils in Argon. p = 10 K/min; Argon 25 cm3/min AG
Sample E1.O E2.0 E3.0 E4.0 R1 .O R2.0 R3.0 R4.0
T1 %
T5 %
200
300
400
DTG
Tm
153 145 198 179 126 148 170 167
177 179 225 213 172 170 210 202
13.8 12.0 1.5 3.0 13.5 10.0 3.3 2.8
84.9 85.6 30.3 48.3 84.9 79.4 54.0 68.5
94.8 97.6 88.4 85.0 95.4 91.2 88.6 90.8
11.93 11.48 10.59 8.66 11.13 8.99 7.36 8.50
254 254 329 325 264 265 309 297
368
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-176: Theimogravimetry of Virgin Oils and Reclaimed Oils in Air. p = 10 K/min; Air 25 cm3/min AG Sample
TI %
T5 %
200
300
400
DTG
Tm
142 140 198 174 137 127 162 167
177 169 225 215 171 169 200 204
13.0 20.0 1.1 2.8 16.3 14.7 5.0 4.2
85.2 85.3 50.0 53.1 82.5 80.4 68.8 71.0
94.4 95.4 84.8 84.0 93.0 89.5 85.8 87.0
12.31 10.60 17.38 12.34 11.99 9.07 8.82 11.14
256 244 3 10 309 240 259 288 293
E1.O E2.0 E3.0 E4.0 R1.O R2.0 R3.0 R4.0
Table 4-177: Thermogravimetry of Synthetic Lubricants in Argon. p = 10 K/min; Argon 25 cm3/min AG Sample ~~
PA0 PA0 PA0 TMP TMP TMP DITDA DITDA DITDA XOA 626
XOA 626 (wt %)
T1 %
T5 %
200
300
400
DTG
Tmx
163 165 167 179 171 163 146 140 154 110
198 200 206 212 222 207 213 213 205 184
5.7 5.0 3.9 3.0 2.5 3.8 3.5 3.1 4.2 11.0
80.0 80.0 67.0 76.1 60.0 60.0 82.0 70.0 76.0 50.0
91.8 91.7 94.4 89.4 93.0 91.2 87.0 94.2 94.0 65.0
9.74 11.30 8.48 11.85 13.94 9.27 16.19 16.37 14.58 5.15 3.35
266 264 275 283 295 303 287 298 300 239 397
~
0 5.0 11.1 0 5.0 11.1 0 5.0 11.1 100
4.7 Lubricants
369
Table 4-178: Theimogravimetry of Synthetic Lubricants in Air. p= 10 K/min; Air 25 cm3/min
Sample PA0 PA0 PA0 TMP TMP TMP DITDA DITDA DITDA XOA 626
XOA 626 (wt %)
T1%
23%
200
300
400
DTG
Tm
0 5.0 11.1 0 5.0 11.1 0 5.0 11.1 100
163 169 157 183 187 176 143 136 144 116
20 1 204 205 213 227 215 198 214 213 178
4.9 4.1 4.3 2.5 1.o 2.8 5.8 3.5 3.8 9.1
82.1 82.1 83.0 80.0 66.0 70.0 83.9 86.7 80.0 50.0
90.8 90.0 91.5 93.9 93.0 93.2 92.1 94.2 95.0 75.0
11.61 14.66 18.77 12.50 16.32 17.38 10.55 19.74 10.55 4.84 3.26
26 1 259 278 265 293 292 259 279 259 248 361
Table 4-179: Oxidation Start Temperature by Thermogravimetry Tax, p= 10 K/min, Air 1 bar and 25 cm3/min Substance
To, ("C)
Virgin Oils E1.O E2.0 E3.0 E4.0 Reclaimed Oils R1.O R2.0 R3.0 R4.0 Synthetic Lubricants P A 0 5.0 TMP 6.0 DITDA 7.0 Synthetic Lubricants + 5.0 % XOA 626 PA0 5.1 TMP 6.1 DITDA 7.1 Synthetic Lubricants + 11.1 % XOA PA0 5.2 TMP 6.2 DITDA 7.2
285 320 310
Additive Package XOA 626
305
310 265 3 10 310 305 345 340 350 265 280 270 280 310 280
370
4 Therrnoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
The evaporation loss was also determined using the Noack test (DIN 51 581). Simulation by isothermal gravimetry results in considerably higher evaporation losses even at 200 "C test temperature, as shown in tables 4-180 and 4-1 8 1. Despite the specification by the supplier of an oil content of 36.2 wt% in XOA 626, the loss in isothermal gravimetry at 200 "C amounts to nearly 48 wt% after 90 minutes test time. During the first hour of the test the losses of XOA 626 are higher than those of TMP or DITDA. The evaporation losses of the synthetic lubricants decrease with increasing concentrations of additive. We cannot confirm whether this is a consequence of the content of high-boiling components in XOA 626, or whether the generation of volatile oxidation products is prevented. Comparison of the TGA curves indicates that the high-boiling components of the additive package are responsible. Generally, the evaporation losses from the synthetic lubricants are of the order of magnitude of those from petroleum based oils of comparable average molecular weight. The oxidation behavior was further investigated by DSC in air (7 bar pressure, 5 cm3/ min flow rate, heating rate p= 10 K/min). The evaluations were carried out as described in chapter 4.7.2. The petroleum based oils supplied diagrams shown schematically in fig. 4129. No significant differences were observed between virgin and reclaimed oils. In the diagrams of the synthetic lubricants, the first peak appears more slender and higher, the Table 4-180: Evaporation Loss of Virgin Oils and Reclaimed Oils (wt %) Sample E1.O El.l E1.2 E2.0 E2. I E2.2 E3.0 E3.1 E3.2 E4.0 E4. I E4.2 R1.O R1.l R1.2 R2.0 R2.1 R2.2 R3.0 R3.1 R3.2 R4.0 R4.1 R4.2
XOA 626 (wt %) -
5.0 11.1 -
5.0 11.1 -
5.0 11.1 -
10'
42.2 41.0 40.6 59.3 50.7 32.8 7.0 4.3 3.3 7.0 -
11.1
8.1
-
53.9 37.3 26.0 29.0 28.2 27.3 20.2 13.9 12.3 18.7 17.3 14.3
5.0 11.1 -
5.0 11.1 -
5.0 11.1 -
5.0 11.1
Gravimetry at 200 "C 30' 60'
DIN 51581 90 '
84.3 84.3 82.0 91.0 88.0 78.0 16.2 12.1 9.6 18.5
90.6 88.2 84.6 92.3 89.5 84.3 26.3 20.3 16.7 27.0
92.3 89.2 85.3 94.0 91.0 87.9 34.0 22.1 22.2 34.0 -
-
17.0 90.3 76.8 62.3 58.5 58.7 54. I 43.1 31.0 27.7 40.4 34.0 31.0
26.3
32.6 93.0 92.0 85.6 76.4 75.8 72.2 65.7 51.1 46.6 68.0 54.0 51.2
5.2 20.8
-
92.0 83.7 81.8 72.2 70.8 67.3 58.2 43.8 39.4 59.0 46.4 43.9
22.6 -
19.6 27.9 -
18.2 2.6 -
3.6 5.3
-
20.7 17.3 -
16.7 3.4 -
3.5 9.5 9.4
4.7 Lubricants
371
Table 4-181: Evaporation Loss of the Synthetic Lubricants (wt %) ~
Sample
PA0 5.0 PA0 5.1 PA0 5.2 TMP 6.0 TMP 6.1 TMP 6.2 DITDA 7.0 DITDA 7.1 DITDA 7.2 XOA 626
t
XOA 626 (wt %) -
5.0 11.1 -
5 .0 11.1 -
5.0 11.1 100
10' 19.1 17.0 21.0 11.0 10.8 11.0 12.0 7.5 6.3 42.0
Gravimetry at 200 "C 30' 60'
53.8 52.2 51.8 31.2 32.0 31.3 35.5 33.8 33.5 41.8
75.0 72.8 67.8 65.9 60.5 56.1 58.0 55.2 49.9 46.1
EX0
END0
Fig. 4-137 DSC Oxidaton of Pure P A 0 Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air, Pressure 7 bar, Flow Rate 5 cm3/min
DIN 51581 90' 81.0 78.0 74.4 72.8 69.2 66.5 70.0 66.3 61.8 47.9
16.4 11.1 12.6 10.7 8.0 7.0 9.2 8.0 6.9 9.8
372
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
second peak smaller; this is contrary to the corresponding peaks of petroleum based lubricants as shown in Fig. 4-137 (PA0 5.0 without additive). The additive treatment results in a shift of the oxidation start temperatures (TB,To,,,,) towards higher values for each of the substances tested and makes the first peak of the synthetics more slender (Fig. 4-138 and 4-139). The maximum temperatures of the second peak for petroleum based and for synthetic lubrication oils both with and without additives are in the same temperature range. XOA 626 only presents the second maximum at a considerably lower temperature. The additive treatment demonstrates an essential influence on only the first oxidation peak. According to the schematic diagram Fig. 4-129 the following data were drawn from the recorder plots (Table 4-182):
TB
Oxidation start temperature Temperature of the first deviation of the left branch of the curve from linearity
Fig. 4-138 DSC Oxidation of PA0 + 5 % (wt.) XOA 626
Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air, Pressure 7 bar, Flow Rate 5 cm3/min
4.7 Lubricants
460
373
T ["C 1
Fig. 4-139 DSC Oxidation of P A 0 + 11.1 % (wt.) XOA 626 Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air, Pressure 7 bar, Flow Rate 5 cm3/min
Tonset Onset point temperature Oxidation start temperature Maximum temperature of the first oxidation peak Tmxl Ratio of the partial area (AGH) up to 250 "C temperature upon the total area FV,,, of peak 1 (ABC) Maximum temperature of the second oxidation peak Tm, According to the hypothesis, a substance which has high temperatures TBand Tonset and a small area ratio FV,,, has a high oxidation stability. Each of the substances was tested in five identical experiments and the data were evaluated by statistics. Table 4-182 demonstrates the means X and the coefficients of variations fV for each of the index numbers mentioned above. The values for the virgin and the reclaimed oils of both specifications SAE 1OW and SAE 30 exhibit only small tolerances, so that they may be combined. The denomination A in Table 4-182 includes all four virgin oils, the denomination B all four reclaimed oils.
*
Up to 250 "C no area
5.1 PA0 5.2 PA0 6.0 TMP 6.1 TMP 6.2 TMP 7.0 DITDA 7.1 DITDA 7.2 DITDA 8.0 XOA 626
A.0 Virgin Oil A.l Virgin Oil A.2 Virgin Oil B.0 Reclaimed Oil B.1 Reclaimed Oil €3.2 Reclaimed Oil 5.0 PA0
Substance
5.0 11.1 100
-
5.0 11.1
-
5.0 11.1
-
5.0 11.1
-
5 .0 11.1
-
XOA 626 (wt%)
237.0 239.4 173.5 260.0 255.6 166.0 242.5 250.0 181.3
175.6 226.5 235.6 181.0 219.4 234.4 180.0
X("C)
Table 4-182: Oxidation Stability by DSC. TB
2.98 1.78 2.85 1.36 1.23 0.85 2.92 2.83 6.82
2.70 3.67 3.71 5.96 2.35 1.02 3.93
+V(%)
237.0 244.3 191.0 260.0 271.3 173.5 242.5 258.2 196.3
192.5 243.7 254.1 210.0 238.9 253.5 189.0 2.98 0.61 2.96 1.36 0.53 2.85 2.92 0.69 4.50
2.60 1.66 0.91 1.94 1.33 0.75 2.99
?V(%)
Tonset
X("C)
254.0 273.0 271.5 281.3 285.1 262.5 282.5 282.5 322.3
285.0 250.8 261.3 281.5 247.8 260.0 255.0 0.56 2.32 2.34 0.63 0.58 6.25 1.35 1.25 1.10
9.37 1.88 3.24 5.25 1.53 0.79 2.77
kV(%)
TlTlaXl
X("C)
31.25 8'15 0.70 1.38
*
.k
12.2 0.92 22.03
''.I5 8.28 14.35
8.56
13.26 12.17 8.44
8.69 9.28 10.51
7.53 0.89 10.14 6.90
FV2m L-V(%)
21.55 11.26 0.63 16.24 15.76 0.81 50.04
X(%)
Tm2
0.31 0.43
413.8
0.44 461.3
478.5
3.22
0.74
477.5 463.7
1,69
0.4 467,0
477.0
2,96
1.09
480.3 470.0
3.77 2.71
463.9 460.8
X("C) kV(%)
x-
0
;a
a 5 ap
2 2
F7
2 3
2
&.
g. ::
$
g. *
-.
Q
2 s kg
i?
A Y
P
-1
w
4.7 Lubricants
375
All the means were compared to determine any statistical differences. Thus the following statements may be made:
- Oxidation start temperatures TB and Tonset: For each of the samples the oxidation start temperature increases on additive treatment. A statistical difference exists only for the TB of the reclaimed oils containing 5 wt% and 11.1 wt% additive. To,,,, demonstrates differences for the reclaimed oils, TMP, and DITDA.
- Tmxl:
The additive treatment of the petroleum based oils effects a decrease of Tmxl.Neither virgin oils nor reclaimed oils demonstrate any differences neither with nor without additive. For PA0 the values are equal for the samples without additive and with 5 wt% additive. A significant difference exists between the values of 5 wt% additive treatment and those of 11 wt%. For TMP and DITDA, 5 wt% of additive is sufficient to cause T-, to rise considerably, whereas difference exists between the values of 5 wt% and 11.1wt% additive treatment.
-
Area ratio FV,,,: Generally the values of FV,,, decrease as a consequence of increasing additive concentration. With TMP the additive treatment has such a pronounced effect that no partial area appears, neither with 5 wt% nor with 11.1wt% additive. On the contrary the reclaimed oils do not demonstrate any effect with an additive concentration of 5 wt %. Indeed the area ratios FV,,, of the reclaimed oils are considerably smaller than those of the virgin oils. Whether this is a consequence of the presence of residual amounts of additives in the reclaimed oils or a consequence of the lack of easily oxidable components, which are still present in the virgin oils, cannot be decided.
- Tmxi
The virtual differences are mostly within the tolerances of the method or are caused by different surface structures of the coke residues, which bum in this reaction step. The surface effects are too great for positive statements concerning Tm2.
-
XOA626: T' and Tonset of XOA 626 are of the order of magnitude for lubricants without additives. T-, exceeds the corresponding temperatures considerably whereas T-, exhibits quite low temperatures. FV,,, also demonstrates a low value of 1.38 % in the range of highly additive-treated lubricants. A critical review of this comparative investigation leads to the conclusion that thermogravimetry is suitable for investigation of the evaporation behavior. Isothermal gravimetry supplies results which definitely give more information than the Noack evaporation test. Comparison between the curves of the temperature programmed TGA both in argon and in air should supply the oxidation start temperature at atmospheric pressure. The experimental data do not confirm that the synthetic lubricants should be more resistent to oxidative attacks than petroleum based oils, even without any additive. Generally, unrealistically high oxidation start temperatures have been found by comparison of the TGA curves.
376
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Disregarding the fact that, at the beginning of an oxidation, non-volatile oxygen-containing products are generated, in addition simultaneous evaporation and oxidation take place in the same temperature interval. We can only give a limited recommendation of thermogravimetry as a tool for the investigation of the oxidation stability. Increase of air pressure in DSC effects an increase of the evaporation temperature, whereas the oxidation shifts to lower temperatures due an increase of the oxygen partial pressure. This allows some differentiations to be made. Critical comparison of the oxidation start temperatures, the maximum temperature of the first oxidation peak, and the area ratio does not support the assertion that the synthetic lubricants, even without additive, are more stable to oxidation than additive-treated petroleum based oils. The reclaimed oils with no additive exhibit a somewhat higher oxidation stability than the coiresponding virgin oils. Each of the lubricants investigated reacted well to additive treatment and there were no differences between virgin and reclaimed oils. Synthetic lubricants react better to the additive treatment than do the petroleum based oils. This is most clearly demonstrated by TMP. Generally the oxidation start temperatures increase considerably as a consequence of additive treatment if the recommended concentration is used. The increase amounts to approximately 60 "C for virgin oils, to approx. 50 "C for reclaimed oils, to approx. 60 "C for PAO, to 80 "C for TMP, and to 85 "C for DITDA. Although the area ratio FV,,, does not have any physical significance, it provides a very useful method of discrimination. It is evident that a concentration of 11.1 wt% of XOA will be needed to generate sufficent oxidation stability in petroleum based oils, whereas 5 wt% of additive is enough to give valuable protection for synthetic lubrication oils. These investigations cannot tell us anything about the permanence of the oxidation stability: for that purpose we would have to use the correlation of the half life time with the temperature, as determined by the Arrhenius equation, which take much more experimental time. Nevertheless the tests presented are very useful for screening purposes and for comparisons.
4.8 Silicone oils Silicone oils are high temperature lubricants, which are becoming more frequently used because of claims about their thermal stability, and their ability to prolong the interval between oil changes. A particular applicaion is in a continuous laminating press for the production of chipboard, where the lubricant acts also as a heat conducting fluid as well as an hydraulic fluid. Contamination of the fluid by organic substances (wood chips, glues) cannot be excluded and may influence its thermoxidative behavior. A study on the hydrostatic bearings of continuous laminating presses [4-8I] prompted investigation of different silicone oils and other lubricants [4-821. Silicone oils have high thermal and oxidation stability of the base oil, which may be increased by additive treatment.
4.8 Silicone oils
377
Silicone oils or siloxanes are polymeric compounds of silicon, characterized by
groups. The free valences of four-valent silicon are bonded to organic groups such as methyl or phenyl groups. The technically most important silicone oils are polydimethylsiloxanes and the polymethylphenylsiloxanes. Oxidation stability increases with increasing substitution of methyl by phenyl groups. The aging behavior of silicone oils is quite different to that of other lubricants. The oxidation products of hydrocarbons, such as petroleum-based lubrication oils or polyalphaolefins largely cause a continuous increase in viscosity. Some highly volatile cracking and oxidation products are generated simultaneously. Contaminations may accelerate the reaction rate of such an oxidation process. The polyglycol lubricants undergo a rapid drop of viscosity after an induction period of varying length, with concomitant failure of lubricating properties. A sharp decrease of the pH value announces this oxidation effect. The oxidative decomposition of polysiloxanes starts at the organic groups and first causes a decrease in the viscosity. Generation of a sufficent quantity of hydroperoxide and peroxide radicals may induce cross-linking, which might go as far as to change the liquid to the solid phase, with formation of a kind of silicone rubber [4-831. That would have dire consequences for the oil pipe system of the machinery. Table 4-183 lists the characteristic data of the oils under investigation in the study [4-811. The quantities of methyl and phenyl groups were determined by NMR analysis and are listed in Table 4-184. Investigation of the aging behavior, i. e. the oxidation stability, of polysiloxanes involves the well-known problem of simulating long-term aging by a relevant short-term test. The temperatures in the presumed application will range from 190 "C up to 225 OC, which determines the lower temperature limit of the tests. For a conventional test, oil samples of 8 0 g each in open ceramic cups were oven aged in a heating cabinet at 220°C for a prolonged period. At defined intervals the samples were cooled down to 25 "C and their viscosity was tested using a rotation viscosimeter, applying equal shear rates each time. The influence of contamination was simulated by the addition of wood chips in a concentration of 1 wt% and 2 wt%. In an open system weight losses occur by evaporation at the test temperature of 220 OC, so the weight losses were checked hourly, over 8 hours, on different samples. At the same time, isothermal gravimetry was carried out at 200 "C in argon. Fig. 4-140 shows the results from the oven aging experiments and Fig. 4-141 those of isothermal gravimetry. The evaporation of the polymethylsiloxanes corresponds to their molecular size as defined by the viscosity. The evaporation behavior of the polymethylphenylsiloxanes is influenced additionally by the phenyl group content (Fig. 4-142 and 4-143). The different ratios of surface to volume of the sample cups is also taken into account (cup from oven aging: S:V N 0.58; thermobalance pan: S:V 2.0). In addition the high gas flow rate of the thermogravimetry effects a more rapid evaporation. Nevertheless both test methods show very similar trends. N
151 650
Medium content of phenyl groups
High content of phenyl groups
Perfluoroalkylether
25 26
29
1980
366 737 860 96 1 800 100 852
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
1012 209 209 1000 1000
776 104 190 118
2450
Low content of phenyl groups
Polymethylphenylsiloxane
Polymethylsiloxanes Polydimethylsiloxane
Polyalphaolefin
(mPa. s)
lynamic Visosity at 25 "C
13 14 15 16 17
9 10 11 12
I
Sample No.
130
1.04 1.04
-
450
Viscosity Index
1.915
1.065 1.103
1.07 1.10
1.03 1.03
Density
Table 4-183: Characteristic data of the oils under investigation (Suppliers specifications)
I
3 . lo-'
10-6 10-6
Vapor Pressure at 200 "C
21
24.5 28.5
24.2
23.1 23.1
19-23
31
(mN/m)
Surface Tension
0.24
1.46 1.50
1.56 1.56
2
!?
?
F
2a
R
9a
6
2a
a
4.8 Silicone oils
Table 4-184: NMR analysis of Polysiloxanes Sample No.
Phenyl groups
Methyl groups
(%)
(%I
9 10 11 12 17 19 21 24 26
0 0 0 0 16.3 29.6 30.3 30.2 40.4
100 100 100 100 83.7 70.4 69.7 69.8 59.6
1st I-
-I
I
1,0
2.0
3,O
.
I
.
1
.
4,0
I
.
I
.
5,0
I
,
I
.
I
6,0
.
I
.
l
7,0
.
8,0
Fig. 4-140 Vaporization Loss of Polymethylsiloxanes during Oven Aging, 8 hours at 220 "C [4-811
379
380
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Evaporation Loss
0
20
LO
(%I
60
80
100
120
KO
Fig. 4-141 Isothermal Thermogravimetry of Polymethylsiloxanes Temperature: 200 "C Residence Time: 120 min Vaporization Loss [4-811
Fig. 4-142 Vaporization Loss of Polymethylphenylsiloxanes during Oven Aging, 8 hours 220 "C [4-8 11
4.8 Silicone oils
Evaporation Loss (%I 4,o
Fig.4-143 Isothermal Therrnogravimetry of Polyrnethylphenylsiloxanes Temperature: 200 "C Residence Time: 120 min Vaporization loss [4-811
100
80
60
LO
20
0
100
200
300
h 0
500
Fig. 4-144 Thermogravirnetry of Virgin Polysiloxanes Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 25 crn3/rnin .
600
700 T ("C)
-
800
381
239
267
212
259
240
262
220 223
217
10
11
17
19
20
22
24 26
29
246
235 263
323
311
317
287
350
326
313 388
TI
Tmax
426 553 472 539 533
484 307 512 310
5.74 539
2.87 2.49 4.22 99.1 18.75
23.5 34.0
16.0
1.59 4.21 18.9 3.13 3.43 17.8 3.45
14.0
35.6 16.20 436 6.4 3.50 464 7.63 545 15.9 3.01 497 3.73 610 10.7 5.61 606
T5 % AG400 DTG [ T I [wt%1 [%/min]
Virgin Oil
0
32.7 16.4
31.1
32.5
26.0
17.8
2.9
9.8
0 0.7
R800 [wt%]
310 310
310
305
300
333
321
357 362
370
353
350
408
387
377
-
321
-
-2)
["C]
2,
measuring not possible Gelation
12.0 12.3
8.2
10.5
12.1
4.5
7.3
8.6
-
-
-
"C]
Tm
2.56 2.86 8.57 8.63 10.12 9.72 3.82 4.81
517 550 550 504 515 530 528 457
3.38 510 4.44 626 6.26 540
4.81 628
-
DTG [wt%] (%/rnin]
TS % AG400
-1)
T1 % ["C]
Oven-aged pure oil (0 % wood chips)
Sample from a plant, 120 days at an average temperature of 220 "C
237 253
T1 % ["Cl
1 9
Sample No.
33.3 30.1
20.3
14.3
40.0
32.9
7.0
6.0
-
-
[wt%]
R800
209
309 312
332
318
250
369 365
383
378
-
-
-
388
-
2.30
2.89
-
2.36
-
-
4.72
9.4 0.82 11.2 2.45
7.1
7.2
-
6.7
-
556
481 500
511
562
-
586
-
Oven-aged contaminated oil (2 wt % wood chips)
279
Table 4-185: Index numbers of thermogravimetry in inert atmosphere of virgin and oven-aged oils.
SL
Q
s
43.8
- $
P
- 2 g5 51.1 18.7
27.6
- 2
0
2 19.2 3 3
1.3
2 8 E.
3 - ' =
0
3
2+
Y
4.8 Silicone oils
383
Temperature-programmed thermogravimetry in inert gas gives a quick survey of the evaporation behavior, as shown in Fig. 4-144 for some polysiloxanes. For comparison, the TGA curves of a polyalphaolefin (sample 1) and of a perfluoroalkylether (sample 29) are also plotted. Those substances evaporate at considerably lower temperatures than the polysiloxanes despite their substantially higher viscosities. Similar behavior was observed in the isothermal gravimetry. For comparison the oven-aged samples (120 days at 220 "C both with and without wood chips) were also tested by thermogravimetry. The index numbers from those experiments are listed in Table 4-185. Oven aging both with and without organic contamination causes an increase of the evaporation start temperature (T1 % and T5 %) and a decrease of the quantity of the
loor
'0
E
Fig. 4-145 Thermogravimetry of Polymethylsiloxane No. 11 Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Virgin Oil Curve 2: After Oven Aging 120 Days 220 "C Curve 3: After Oven Aging with Addition of 2 wt% Wood chips 120 Days 220 "C
384
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
distillable fraction (AG400). The TGA results do not indicate whether the samples have undergone an evaporation loss during the oven-aging or whether the molecule size is increasing due to partial cross-linking. The rise of T1 % and T5 % of the polymethylsiloxanes is less in the presence of contaminants than without them. There is an increased reduction oft AG400 for polymethylsiloxanes and for polymethylphenylsiloxanes due to the contamination. The other data, such as DTG, Tm,, and R800, do not show such regular behavior. In Fig. 4-145 to 4-147 the TGA curves of some polysiloxanes are compared. The three curves represent the behavior of the virgin oil, of the oven-aged sample without wood chips, and of the oven-aged sample with 2 wt% wood chips. The oven aging was carried out at 220 "C for 120 days. The polymethylsiloxane (sample 11) shows very small differenr Residue ( I 100 -
f
\
,"\ \
*\
\
'I+
75 -
\
50
-
25
-
-
100
;
400
5
1
600
700
8
Fig. 4-146 Thermogravimetry of Polymethylphenylsiloxane No. 19 (30 % Phenyl Groups) Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Virgin Oil Curve 2: After Oven Aging 120 Days 220 "C Curve 3: After Oven Aging with Addition of 2 wt% Wood chips 120 Days 220 "C
o
4.8 Silicone oils
385
ces between the three curves, whereas considerable differences are shown by the polymethylphenylsiloxanes with a medium phenyl group content (sample 19, Fig. 4-146) and high phenyl group content (sample 26, Fig. 4-147). The results of thermogravimetry in air of the virgin samples are tabulated in Table 4-1 86; those of oven-aged, contaminated samples in Table 4-1 87. There are considerable differences between the TGA curves for the experiments in argon and in air for polymethylsiloxane, sample 11 (Fig. 4-148). Those differences diminish substantially for polymethylphenylsiloxanes, sample 19 (Fig. 4-149) and sample 26 (Fig. 4-150). The shape of the curve is maintained in the graphs from oven-aged, contaminated samples, although they are shifted towards higher temperatures. Residue
o
(%I
T\
l
I
600
700
800
Fig. 4-147 Thermogravimetry of Polymethylphenylsiloxane No. 26 (40 % Phenyl Groups) Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Virgin Oil Curve 2: After Oven Aging 120 Days 220 "C Curve 3: After Oven Aging with Addition of 2 wt% Wood chips 120 Days 220 "C
386
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Product5
Table 4-186: Thermograviinetry of silicone oils in air (virgin oils). p= 10 K/min, Gas flow rate 25 cm3/min Sample No
TI %
T5 %
AG
R
200
300
400
600
DTG
Tmax
14.74 2.29 1.53 2.03 3.97 4.21 3.97 9.32 5.63 2.44 8.00 6.17 4.29 4.78 2.63 5.23 3.32 3.06 2.49 4.48 2.29 1.89 6.29 4.60 2.60 2.87 2.49 4.44 18.75
335 41 1 518 476 424 476 520 37 1 397 470 370 377 509 375 419 43 1 470 500 553 412 489 506 469 500 529 484 370 512 310
800
1
247
299
0.2
6.5
78.2
0
9
265
333
0.4
1.9
17.0
39.6
39.1
10
250
320
0.1
3.7
38.8
35.7
33.1
11
257
343
0.1
2.8
30.9
35.1
34.2
12
200
273
1.o
7.5
52.1
18.7
16.8
17
220
288
0.7
6.2
15.7
32.1
27.9
19
250
310
0.1
4.3
28.1
33.9
25.7
20
242
305
0.3
4.8
20.8
23.0
19.0
24 26
220 223
285 263
0.7 0.3
6.9 13.4
23.5 34.0
35.1 17.3
32.7 16.4
29
217
246
0.3
58.5
99.1
0
0
Table 4-187: Thermogravimetry of oven-aged silicone oils (aged with 2 wt % wood chips) in air. p = 10 Klmin, Gas flow rate 25 cm3/min AG 300
11
315
350
0.2
19 20 24
301 312 298
360 368 364
0.2 0.1 0.3
318
366
0
26
1 1 1
I 400
R
600
DTG
800 41.0
0.9 0.8 1.1
14.7 12.3 12.3
33.3 40.3 50.1
23.4 28.6 35.6 28.8
1.02 2.09 1.78 1.93 1.41 0.6 1.64 0.93
353 516 430 425 42 1 652 432 645
4.8 Silicone oils
Fig. 4-148 Thermogravimetry of Polymethylsiloxane No. 11 Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Argon Curve 2: Air
381
388
100
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Residue
(%I
w \
\\ \
I
75
b\
l
'\
v \
T\J 50
\
\
1 25
2
r
(oc)
__c
Fig. 4-149 Thermogravimetry of Polymethylphenylsiloxane No. 19 (30 % Phenyl Groups) Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Argon Curve2: Air
4.8 Silicone oils
100
Residue
(XI
389
I
Fig. 4-150 Thermogravimetry of Polymethylphenylsiloxane No. 26 (40 % Phenyl Groups) Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Gas Flow Rate: 25 cm3/min Curve 1: Argon
Curve 2: Air
Alteration of the viscosity can be regarded as an indicator of the aging behavior of the sample as a result of oven-aging. For example, the behavior of two polymethylphenylsiloxanes of low (sample 13) and high, (sample 24) phenyl group concentration, is shown in fig. 4-151. It is evident that the increase of viscosity takes place in two stages: the first seems to be only evaporation, and is terminated after approximately 60 days for sample 13. Beyond 100 days, the viscosity starts to rise again, now exponentially,which indicates that an autocatalytic reaction is occurring. For sample 24, the increase of viscosity caused by evaporation continues smoothly after 70 days, joining the increase due to oxidation. The point of inflexion of the curve marks the start of the oxidation reaction. The slope of the
390
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
12
-
10
v)
2 8 Y
%
c,
.r
2
6
VI .7
w
L
2 0
0
LO
80
120
160
200
210
280
Time (days)
Fig. 4-151 Oven Aging at 220 "C of Polylmethylphenylsiloxanes No. 13 16 % Phenyl Groups No. 24 30 % Phenyl Groups Viscosity versus Residence Time Parameter: Concentration of Wood chips Table 4-188: Oxidation start time to, (days) during oven aging at T = 220 "C Sample No.
9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26
Stabilization
without wood chips
20 400 325 45 75 100 65 30 290 65 207 68 23 8 71 > 400 > 400
with 2 wt % wood chips
35 200 165 20 145 170 65 50 290 115 113 90 205 55 > 400 > 400
4.8 Silicone oils
391
oxidation curve in the plot of viscosity versus time is described by an exponential equation similar to the Arrhenius equation:
q = a(1) .
' f
Eq. 4-22
The coefficient a(2) is responsible for the slope of the viscosity - time function. Its reciprocal value a(2)-' is a useful measure of the aging behavior. The start times of the oxidation reaction to,marked by the point of inflexion of the curve in the plot of viscosity versus time are listed in Table 4-1 88. Table 4-1 89 gives the values of the aging coefficients, a(1) and a(2), calculated by approximation, and the mean deviation of the calculated curve from the experimental value. From Table 4-188 it is evident that the oxidation start times display very different values, from 20 days up to more than 400 days. The stabilizing effect of the phenyl group becomes visible at high phenyl group content, for example with sample 25 and 26. Some of the samples under investigation had been stabilized by the manufacturers (sample 15, 17, 20, 22, and 24). A distinct prolongation of the induction period is not found in every case. Organic contamination has very different effects on the induction periods, prolonging it for samples 9, 14, 15, 17, 19, and 21, but on the contrary reducing it for the other samples. The coefficient a(2)-' has a high value when the phenyl group content is high, but there is no functional relationship betweeen a(2)-' and the concentration of phenyl groups. The coefficient a(2)-' of the oven-aged samples 14, 16, 17, 19, and 21, which are contaminated by wood chips, is higher than for the samples without contamination. Exact correlations with the index numbers of thermogravimetry have not been found. Only the evaporation behavior may properly be described by isothermal and temperature-programmed TGA. The test times for oven aging at 200 "C are too long for practical application (20 days = 2.9 .lo4 minutes up to more than 400 days = 5.8 . lo5 minutes). Attempting to reduce the experimental period by increasing the test temperature leads to increased overlap of evaporation and oxidation and does not supply any data which are useful in practice. It is more worthwhile to use DSC at moderately elevated pressure to determine the coefficients of the Arrhenius equation for the oxidation reactions, because it is then possible to calculate the reaction rate constant k and the half life time tl,2 and to extrapolate them to temperatures which are used in practical applications. DSC experiments in air at 7 bar pressure supplied completely different plots compared to the DSC oxidation of hydrocarbons (Fig. 4-152). The oxidation start temperature Tonset of the virgin samples is 370 to 400 "C (except the polymethylsiloxane sample 9) (Table 4-190). A first, weak, peak maximum was found between 350 "C (sample 9) and 450 "C (sample 26). A more or less pronounced shoulder on the ascending flank of peak 2 appears in all the samples. The distinct second peak is situated in the temperature range from 415 "C (sample 10) up to 547 "C (sample 20) (Table 4-191). The first and second peaks are shifted towards higher temperatures when the concentration of phenyl groups increases, but this phenomeneon cannot be quantified. The experiments on aged samples give similar results. Contaminationby wood chips causes shift towards higher or lower peak maximum temperatures compared to the virgin samples. In some cases, the activation energy E and
0% 2%
0% 2%
2%
0%
Wood Chips
11
12
41.07 27.62 9.71 3.42 2.52 1.84 20.04 3.95
-
-
-
-
-
40 46
-
37 42
-
50
22 112
-
-
-
Deviation (mean)
17
18
19
167 181
154 63
0.53 0.0065 0.11 0.016
20
189 227
0.78 0.0053 0.81 0.0044
21
18.19 4.82 6.16 7.09 14.41 15.29 28.14 6.02
200 200
0.705 1.43 0.17 0.60 0.027 0.025 0.005 0.006 0.37 0.79 0.198 0.51 0.024 0.0217 0.005 0.0055
16
-
3.37
-
-
15
0.0067 0.032 0.046 0.020 0,167 0.0089 -
14
-
6.88
-
-
0.169 0.248 0.0018 0.0009 -
-
-
-
-
-
10
a(21-l a(21-1
a(1) a(2) a(l) 42)
Coefficient 9
Table 4-189: Coefficients a( 1) and a(2) of the exponential equation for viscosity.
7.43 6.31
263 167
1.18 0.0038 0.69 0.006
22
26
500 500
15.25 8.24
1000 333
0.147 1.33 0.002 0.001 0.11 0.73 0.002 0.003
25
18.73 5.52 9.81 6.23
39 39
0.07 0.026 0.16 0.026
24
g-
a
2 h
R
3
R
3
E
az2
3
0
A
4.8 Silicone oils
Heat Flow
(mu)
No. 2>
Fig. 4-152 DSC Oxidation of Polysiloxanes Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air, Pressure 7 bar, Flow Rate 5 cm3/min No. 11: Polymethylsiloxane No. 26: Polymethylphenylsiloxane (40 % Phenyl Groups)
393
265 289 376 365 393 363 408 409 395 384 345
292.5 351.3 379.1 367.2 403.8 411.1 432.5 433.8 420.3 450.0 385.0
256.1 438.8 428.3 439.8 217.3 193.8 217.8 208.7 239.5 358.1 327.0
Virgin oils
23.704 36.906 34.421 36.099 16.547 14.496 15.916 15.195 14.909 25.833 26.261 69.43 63.34 67.25 53.31 46.99 43.30 40.85 44.76 31.34 55.72
0
-
2,
measuring not possible Gelation
-
-
14.235 14.184 22.303 14.499 15.879 18.961 15.080 20.722
-
185.2 180.1 287.8 192.3 218.6 258.8 202.8 278.1
-
360.0 333.8 400.0 406.3 435.0 432.5 419.4 420.0
353 323 383 365 421 411 393 375 -
-
-
-
-1) -2)
Oven-aged pure oils (0 % wood chips)
ample from a plant; 120 days at an average temperature of 220 "C
I 9 10 11 17 19 20 22 24 26 29
Sample No.
Table 4-190: Values of the DSC oxidation of virgin and oven-aged oils.
-
69.86 67.33 48.24 48.63 41.49 42.70 50.98 44.29
-
-
-
352.5 285
9
-
220.6 175.6 -
243.9
-
437.5 420.0 -
471.1
-
408
-
-
-
16.839 47.54
-
15.996 52.34 12.868 47.15
165.4 12.290 49.86 165.0 12.198 49.08
-
B
2
"a
s
$
5
"a
2
'
$. -
CI
b
9
0
01
-
-
-
-
-
-
.:
189.4 12.635 76.12
-
410.0 412.5
-
363 365
350
350
-
-
-
-
-
[rnin-l]
[kJ/Mol] ["C]
c"L 00
Ash [wt%I
logA
E TpiMXl
2 I
Oven-aged contaimed Nils (2 wt % wood chips)
4.8 Silicone oils
395
Table 4-191: DSC oxidation of silicone oils. Temperature ("C) of oxidation peak 2 Sample
Virgin oils
No. 9 10 11 17 19 20 22 24 26
427 415 442 525 541 547 562 531 520
Oven-aged without wood chips
Oven-aged with 2 wt % wood chips
-
-
409 435 511 536 537 54 1 555 535
-
405 -
546 532 -
535 550
the frequency factor A of the first peak are multiples of the values for hydrocarbons, but this could not be correlated with the phenyl group content either. Oven-aging both with and without the presence of wood chips influences the coefficients of the Arrhenius equation in a different manner. Samples 10 and 11 exhibit a considerable decrease. For samples 19 and 29 there is no difference between the virgin samples and the samples aged without contamination. Addition of wood chips effects a substantial decrease of E and A for the aged samples. That is also true for sample 26, i. e. the polymethylphenylsiloxane possessing the highest concentration of phenyl groups. This
Temperature
("C)
___---
1000 f Kelvin
Fig. 4-153 DSC Oxidation of Polysiloxanes Virgin Oils Low Temperature Oxidation (LTO, Peak 1) Half Life Time t,,2 versus Temperature
396
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
different reaction to organic contamination in DSC corresponds very well to the behavior of the samples in oven-aging. The effects will be further elucidated when we consider the correlation of the reaction constant k or the half life time t1,2 with the temperature (Table 4-192 and Fig. 4-153 to Temperature (‘c)
Fig. 4-154 DSC Oxidation of Polysiloxanes after Oven Aging 120 Days Low Temperature Oxidation (LTO Peak 1) Half Life Time t1,2 versus Temperature
Fig. 4-155 DSC Oxidation of Polysiloxanes after Oven Aging with Addition of 2 wt% Wood chips 120 Days 220 “C Low Temperature Oxidation (LTO Peak 1) Half Life Time t1,2versus Temperature
1 9 10 11 12 17 19 20 22 24 26 29
No.
Sample
kZ50
Virgin oils
2.7081 x 1.3636 x 2.8881 x 10-l2 1.2325 x 3.8410 x 4.3480 x 3.4810 x 1.5229 x lo-* 3.0630 x 1.0142 x 3.6407 x 7.1388 x 1.2449 x 1.3821x 7.3779 x 1.4665 x 1.4134 x lo-* 2.2528 x 2.9269 x 9.8546 x 1.9719 x 1.1851 x 1.4500 x 2.8791 x
boo 2.3189 x loo 8.1870x 6.4621 x 1.0320 x 1.2201 x 10-2 5.5731 x 6.7969 x 1.1578 x 1.4822 x 1.2021 10-4 1.5606 x 2.8832 x
k300
! 6.0919 x 1.8619 x 3.3615 x 1.8657 x 5.5940 x 2.4713 x 4.8995 x 1.04553 x
k200
-
3.6658 x low7 1.9937 x 1.1325 x 10-lo 1.3283 x 6.7622 x 10-lo 8.9376 x
-
loM7 5.4785 x 1.4784 x
k250
1.1784 x 9.4317 x 9.0780 x 2.3841 x 3.9505 x 2.3771 x
-
2.2504 x 5.4722 x
k300
Oven-aged without wood chips
Table 4-192: Reaction rate constant k (min-') of the oxidation of silicone oils (peak 1).
I
1.6347 x 1.4416 x
-
5.9220 x 5.2660 x -
9.2708 x 2.1764 x
-
4.3576 x 3.0563 x
7.7416 x 7.3633 x
-
-
2.3755 x
k300
5.3455 10-9 1.0640 x 9.5576 x
5.3234 x
k250
Oven-aged with 2 wt % wood chips k200
398
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
4.155). The plot of half life time tI12versus 1 OOO/Tdemonstrates a clear separation of the different species of polysiloxanes and other oils. In Fig. 4- 153 the polymethylsiloxanes, samples 9, 10, and 11 exhibit steeper slopes compared to the polymethylphenylsiloxanes, samples 17, 19,20,22, and 24. They are situated in the region between the polyalphaolefin, sample 1, which has a low thermooxidative stability, and the highly stable polymethylphenylsiloxane, sample 26, which has the highest content of phenyl groups. Oven-aging of the pure samples without contamination results in different decreases of the remaining life time, which may be recognized by flatter slopes in Fig. 4-154. The catalytic effect of the added wood chips increases this reduction of life time generally, except for sample 24 (Fig. 4-155). The half life times t,12at 200 "C and at 250 "C of a modified polymethylsiloxane, sample 11, of three polymethylphenylsiloxanes with approximately 30 % phenyl groups (sample 19, 20, and 24), and of a polymethylphenylsiloxane with approximately 40 % phenyl groups (sample 26), are tabulated in Table 4-193. According to the specifications of the suppliers, samples 20 and 24 contain stabilizer, whereby sample 20 represents the stabilized sample 19. At a temperature of 200 "C the values of tIi2do not reflect any stabilizer effect but at 250 "C such an effect may be recognized. This was also indicated by the behavior of the viscosity after oven aging. Mostly a higher reduction of the remnant stability is found after oven-aging of the samples containing wood chips. The kinetics of the first oxidation peak of polysiloxanesmay be regarded as a criterion of the oxidation stability and this is analogous to the behavior of hydrocarbons. The reaction rate constants k or better the half life times t1,2,determined by DSC, can be correlated very well upon the long-term viscosity behavior during oven-aging of the different types of polysiloxanes. The alteration of the viscosity may be described quite satisfactorily by an approximation equation similar to the Arrhenius equation. Comparison between the exponential coefficient a(2) and the reaction rate constant k proves the trend to conformity of the aging behavior of the pure samples both in DSC and in oven-aging (Fig. 4-156). Organic Table 4-193: Half life times t1,2 (min) of the oxidation of polysiloxanes (DSC peak 1). ~~
~
Sample No.
~~
11
19
20
24
26
tIl2 at 200 "C
Virgin oil Oven-aged without wood chips Oven-aged with 2 wt % wood chips
1.99 x 10l2 3.72 x lo5
5.57 x lo6 3.72 x lo6
9.39 x lo7 1.24 x lo5
2.37 x lo8 1.41 x lo7
3.52 x 1013 6.63 x lo9
1.30 x lo8
6.51 x lo5
7.25 x lo5
1.59 x lo8
2.27 x lo6
t1,2at 250 "C
Virgin oil Oven-aged without wood chips Oven-aged with 2 wt % wood chips
4.55 107 4.69 x lo3
5.02 104 3.48 x lo4
4.73 x 105 6.12 x lo5
7.03 x 105 1.03 x lo5
5.85 x 109 7.71 x lo6
1.30 x lo6
1.17 x lo4
1.32 x lo4
7.48 x lo5
3.18 x lo4
4.8 Silicone oils
399
I Fig.4-156 Correlation of the Oxidation Reaction Constant k (DSC, LTO) to the Viscosity Coefficient a(2) of the Oven Aged Polysiloxanes No. 11, 19, 20, 24, 26. k20GT
' h50-C
contaminants clearly influence the aging behavior of polysiloxanes leading to a reduction of the life time (Fig. 4-157). The calculated reaction rate constants for the temperature of 250 "C give better evidence and should be used for the determination of life time. In the logarithmic plots Fig. 4-156 and 4-157, an increase of the values of k and -a(2) represents increasing oxidation stability. Fig. 4-156 shows that the values horn the long-term ovenaging correlate well with the values of the reaction rate constant for samples 19 and 26, whereas not such a good correlation is found for sample 24. In DSC and TGA experiments, both in air, a residue of SiO, remains. It should be possible to draw conclusions concerning the composition of the polysiloxanes from the quantity of this residue. A pure polymethylsiloxanetheoretically yields 80.87 wt% SiO,, a pure polyphenylsiloxane30.38 wt%. However experiments in air yield considerably smaller residues, which are different in the DSC and TGA (Table 4-194).
- -1 24x
024 20x
19x 26X
020
- -2
019 026
6
W
--3
P N
-
- -4 \
Fig.4-157 Correlation of the Oxidation Reaction Constant k (DSC, LTO) to the Viscosity Coefficient a(2) of the PolysiloxanesNo. 11, 19,20,24,26 (Samples Oven Aged with Addition of 2 wt% Wood chips)
' &JOT
' hSGT
400
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Table 4-194: Ash from the oxidation of silicone oils (wt %). Sample No.
DSC in air at 7 bar
TGA in air at 1 bar
9 10 11 12
69.43 63.34 67.25
17 19 21 24 26
53.31 46.99
39.1 33.1 34.2 16.8 27.9 25.7
-
44.76 3 1.34 Polymethylsiloxane Polyphenylsiloxane
-
23.7 13.5
Theoretical
soo,
I 1
80.87 72.59 65.84 65.48 65.53 60.35 80.87 30.38
DSC in air acts as a qualified screening test with relevance to the thermooxidative stability of silicone oils, and saves substantially on experimental time. TGA experiments give additional information on the evaporation behavior. It is impossible to draw conclusions on the composition of silicone oils from the quantity of ash.
4.9 Relation of the kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions to the system pressure: Investigations on tertiary oil recorvery by in situ combustion. The processes in oil recovery and petroleum manufacture mostly take place at more or less elevated pressures. The manufacture of petroleum includes pyrolysis processes such as delayed coking (pressures from 1 to 6 bar), visbreaking (from 15 to 20 bar), or thermal reforming (from 29 to 70 bar). During tertiary oil recovery by steam flooding, high pressures of saturated steam are required, depending on the pressure in the reservoir. The high temperatures of this steam sometimes cause spontaneous visbreaking and continuing cracking reactions [4-841. During in situ combustion, consecutive and parallel pyrolysis and oxidation reactions occur at the pressure of the reservoir. The fundamental principles employed in selecting process parameters and for predicting temporal progress and yields are derived from an understanding of the influence of pressure upon the reactions concerned. Pyrolysis of hydrocarbons is a first order type reaction (see chapter 3.3.1, Eqs. 3-7, 3-8, and 3-9); whereas oxidation does not obey first order. But it has been found experimentally that it may be treated mathematically as a first order reaction with respect to the consumption of fuel, provided there is an excess of air (oxygen). The relation of the reaction rate to the temperature is described by the Arrhenius equation (Eq. 3-7).
4.9 Relation of the kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions
401
Such an equation does not exist to describe the relation of the reaction rate to the system pressure. Several papers have been presented concerning the temperature dependece of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions, but only a few investigations have been reported on the pressur dependence. The reaction rate constant of the pyrolysis reaction of pure saturated hydrocarbons at low pressures (1 bar to 7 bar) on the one hand and at very high pressures (140 bar to 1980 bar) on the other, can be found in Reference 4-85, but the pressure dependence has not been investigated systematically. No data of activation energy and frequency factor have been reported. Crudes from Huntington Beach and from West Newport oil fields have been investigated with regard to in situ combustion [4-861in a pressure range from 0.7 bar to 20.7 bar. Visbreaking reactions were postulated with activation energies between 66.6 and 28.3 kJ/Mol and frequency factors (log A) between 9.897 and 6.853 min I. The subsequent cracking reactions give values of E between 21 1.8 and 179.4 kJ/Mol. The frequency factors log A have values between 20.746 and 17.962 min Systematicresearch on pressure dependence has not been reported in this or other publications [4-87 to 4-92]. Pyrolysis is a simple one-step reaction. However, the reaction mechanism of the oxidation of pure hydrocarbons and multi-component systems such as petroleum and its products are much mor complicated. We may generally describe in situ combustion in three consecutive reaction steps [3-91: At first low-temperature oxidation takes place in the temperature range between approximately 210 "C and 260 'C, with the formation of non-volatile oxygen-containing reaction products. The activation energy in this range is 60-70 kJ/Mol. Between 280 "C and 350 "C oxidation and pyrolysis reactions run both consecutively and in parallel. In this stage volatile products are generated, accompanied by the deposition of coke, so this reaction range is called fuel deposition or fuel formation. The average activation energy resulting from the two ractions is approximately 60-80 kJ/ Mol. This range is followed by the last reaction step, which is called fuel combustion, when combustion of the deposited coke takes place with activation energies between 120 and 140 kJ/Mol. The kinetics of LTO have been published [4-93 to 4-96], but only one of them [4-961 deals with the relation of the coefficients of the Arrhenius equation to the system pressure between 1 and 63 bar. Whilst the activation energies between 63 and 65 kJ/Mol are not related to the pressure, a clear correlation has been found for the frequency factor, with log A = 6.18 min-' at 1 bar pressure and log A = 8.08 min-I at 63 bar. The half-life times tliz at 200, 250, and 300 "C calculated using those coefficients are given in Fig. 4-158. The kinetics of the second reaction step, the fuel deposition, are also discussed in the literature [3-9,4461 where pressure dependence of visbreaking and the cracking reaction has been described in a pressure range from 0.7 up to 20.7 bar. The activation energy and the frequency factor decrease linearly with increasing pressure, whereas both coefficients pass a maximum value at about 10 bar pressure in the cracking reaction. The kinetics of fuel combustion are also the subject of publications [3-9, 4-97]. In Reference 4-97 no dependence of the kinetics on the partial pressure of oxygen was found in reactions at atmospheric pressure, whereas Reference 3-9 describes an unquantified dependence on the system pressure.
'.
402
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
I
I
3‘0
4’0
I
__c
1’0
20
5 0
6 0 P (bar)
Fig. 4-158 Oxidation of Athabasca Bitumen, LTO Range Half Life Time t1,2versus Pressure P [4-871
As mentioned above, knowledge of the relation of the lunetics on the system pressure, for both pyrolysis and oxidation, is of interest for processes in the production of oil and manufacture of petroleum. In tertiary recovery using in situ combustion, considerable pressures, more than 200 bar, may be encountered depending upon the depth of the deposits. Investigations on the kinetics at such high pressures require very robust instrumentation and are not so easy to perform. However, experiments may be performed quite easily using pressure DSC; the instrument used by the author was constructed for pressures up to 70 bar (1 000 psi). Previous experimental work [4-201 provided information on the influence of pressure on the course of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions. We have used a pressure DSC instrument to examine whether the lunetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions can be quantifiably related to the system pressure in such a manner that they may be extrapolated to higher pressures. The first investigations were carried out on two model substances (pure hydrocarbons) and three petroleum components (real systems).
*
5
3 4 -
-
-
-
85.13
85.13 84.03
92.26
-
101
C
85.42
("C)
BP 635*
98-99
MP ("C)
from the extrapolated distillatioii curve of n-alkanes
n-Hexacontane n-C60H122 n-Hexylpyrene n-C22H22 Vacuum residue Asphaltenes Dispersion medium
1
2
Substance
Sample
Table 4-195: Analysis data of the samples.
10.73
10.28 7.97
7.74
14.58
0.43
2.79
3.21 4.49
-
-
0.60 1.35
-
S
-
Elemental analysis (wt %) H N
~
865
966 7328
286.4
843.5
M
1.513
1.449 1.138
1.000
2.048
H/C atomic ratio
-R
w
P 0
2
f:g.
2
s
gg.
0
R
a
2.
3
'a
+
b K' ol
5
2
E. o
re
h
;o
404
4 Therrnoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
A long-chained unbranched normal paraffin (n-hexacontane C,,H,,,) and an alkylaromatic consisting of a condensed aromatic four-ring system with a side-chain of an unbranched paraffin (n-hexylpyrene) were selected as model substances. As real substances we used the vacuum residue of a Venezuela crude and its separated components, i. e. asphaltenes and the oily phase (dispersion medium). This selection was made to avoid additional complications due to distillation effects in the experiments on the multi-component systems. The physical and analytical data, i. e. melting point, MP, boiling point, BP, average relative particle weight, M, element analysis, and atomic ratio H/C are presented in Table 4-195. The simulated distillation curves (by TGA) are shown in Fig. 4-159. The asphaltenes do not contain any volatile components but do undergo a cracking reaction above 400 "C. The distillation (sublimation) curve of n-hexylpyrene is nearly 100 "C-150 "C below the corressponding curves of the other substances. The experiments were carried out using a DuPont 9900 Thermoanalyzer equipped with a pressure DSC cell. Gas pressures of 1, 10,20, and 50 bar were applied at a gas flow rate of 5cm3/min to avoid an uncontrolled rise of pressure as a consequence of the rise of temperature, and to avoid the adjustment of any equilibrium. Argon was used as inert gas
Fig. 4-159 Simulated Distillation by Thermogravimetry Curve 1: n-Hexacontane Curve 2: n-Hexylpyrene Curve 3: Vacuum Residue Curve 5: Dispersion Medium from Vacuum Residue
405
4.9 Relation of the kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions
in the pyrolysis experiments and air as oxidant in the oxidation experiments. The open solid fat index SFI pans (DuPont) were used for sample pans with empty pan as reference. Measurement and evaluation were performed according to ASTM E 698-79. Each substance was measured at every pressure, applying heating rates p= 5 , 10,20, and 50 K/min. The coefficients of the Arrhenius equation E and A, the reaction rate constant k and the half life time tl,2were calculated using the DuPont DSC Thermal Stability Kinetics - ASTM E 698 software, unless an additional regression calculation was required; this was particularly necessary for the second region of oxidation reaction i. e. fuel deposition.
4.9.1 Pyrolysis tests Pyrolysis presents only a more or less broad peak in the temperature region above 400 O C , as Fig. 4-160 shows for n-hexacontane at 1 bar argon pressure and p = 10 K/min. The peak at 100 "C is the melting peak which will not shift due to alterations in the heating rate. The peak maximum at equal heating rates will be displaced towards higher temperatures as a consequence of rising pressures from 455 "C at 1 bar up to 481 "C at 50 bar. The dependence of the peak maximum temperature upon the pressure at a constant heating rate
10
G
A
a
"
454.77'C
3 3 0
-10
I L 4J (P
L
-20
-30
I
1 OD
20G
I
300 Temperature
400
I
500
(OC)
Fig. 4-160 DSC Pyrolysis of n-Hexacontane Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon, Pressure 1 bar, Flow Rate 5 cm3/min
SOD ~-
3
406
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
p=
10 K/min is demonstrated in Table 4-196. The low peak maximum temperatures of a-hexylpyrene, are unusual because they are more than 100 "C below those of the other Table 4-196: Relation of the peak maximum temperature ("C) upon the pressure in pyrolysis in argon. Heating rate fi = 10 K/min Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5
Pressure (bar) n-Hexacontane n-Hex y lpyrene Vacuum residue Asphaltenes Dispersion medium
"1
350
1
10
20
50
455 325 450 453 455
47 1 333 455 456 457
477 354 458 461 46 1
48 1 366 412 465 466
,3 5 I
2
L
P (bar)
I
Fig. 4-161 DSC Pyrolysis in Argon Activation Energy Ekersus Pressure P Curve 1: n-Hexacontane Curve 4 Asphaltenes from Vacuum Residue Curve 2: n-Hexylpyrene Curve 5: Dispersion Medium from Vacuum Residue Curve 3: Vacuum Residue
4.9 Relation of the kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions
407
substances. Fig. 4-161 represents the plot of activation energy E versus pressure P , and Fig. 4-162 the plot of the frequency factor log A versus pressure P . The low values for n-hexylpyrene indicate that evaporation (sublimation) occurs. No logical explanation can be given for the decrease in the values with increasing pressure. The plot of half life time t1,2versus pressure P at constant temperature demonstrates an increase of t,,2 as a consequence of increasing pressure P for n-hexacontane and for n-hexylpyrene (Fig. 4-163). For the vacuum residue and its components the half life time tIizincreases more or less steeply with increasing pressure at 400 "C. The curve of the vacuum residue becomes flatter as temperatures increase, whereas the curves of the asphaltenes and the dispersion medium pass through a maximum value at higher temperatures (Fig. 4-164). This behavior may be understood from the mode of calculation of the reaction rate constant according to Arrhenius (Eq. 3-7). In this equation the frequency factor is a linear term whereas the activation
25
20
15
18
Fig. 4-162 DSC Pyrolysis in Argon
Frequency (Pre-Exponential) Factor log A versus Pressure P Curve 1: n-Hexacontane Curve 4: Asphaltenes from Vacuum Residue Curve 2: n-Hexylpyrene Curve 5 : Dispersion Medium from Vacuum Residue Curve 3: Vacuum Residue
408
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Fig. 4-163 DSC Pyrolysis in Argon Half Life Time t1,2versus Pressure P Parameter: Temperature Curve 1: n-Hexacontane Curve 2: n-Hexylpyrene
4.9 Relation of the kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'.5 I k.-
1 0
20
30
4 0
1
409
I
I
.."" Enno
5 0
-
P ( ba ' )
Fig. 4-164 DSC Pyrolysis in Argon Half Life Time t1,2 versus Pressure P Parameter: Temperature Curve 3: Vacuum Residue Curve 4: Asphaltenes Curve 5: Dispersion Medium
energy appears in the exponent only as a fraction (after division by the universal gas constant R and the Kelvin temperature K). It may be seen from Fig. 4-163 and 4-164 that the pyrolysis behavior of the vacuum residue is governed fundamentally by its oil component (dispersion medium). The steadiness of the functions E = f ( P ) and log A = f(P) permits extrapolation towards higher pressures. These plots show that neither n-hexacontane nor n-hexylpyrene are suitable as model substances for simulation of the pressure dependence of the pyrolysis behavior of heavy components o f petroleum.
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
4 10
4.9.2 Oxidation tests The oxidation reaction comprises three ranges of reaction, i.e. low temperature oxidation LTO, fuel deposition, and fuel combustion, which manifest discrete peaks at different temperatures. For example Fig. 4-165 presents the DSC plot of the oxidation of nhexacontane in 1 bar air at a heating rate p= 5 K/min. An increase of the heating rate shifts the peak maximum temperatures towards higher values, as expected. As a consequence additional peaks appear in the range of fuel deposition, as Fig. 4-166 shows for the example of oxidation of the dispersion medium in 1 bar air at a heating rate p= 20 K/min. An increase of the pressure causes an increase of the area of the LTO peak, whereas peaks in the range of fuel deposition disappear and display only a shouIder on the flank of the LTO peak. The peak of the fuel combustion also becomes wider and flatter (Fig. 4-167, n-hexacontane in 50 bar air, p = 20 K/min).
226.39"C
-2oJ
C
100
200
300
400
500
Temperature ( O C )
Fig. 4-165 DSC Oxidation of n-Hexacontane Heating Rate p : 5 K/min Atmosphere: Air, Pressure 1 bar, Flow Rate 5 cm3/min
60C
7
4.9 Relation
41 1
of the kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions
I
-20
I
G
'
Id0
'
zcc
3co 400 iempQr-tu.ru ('9
5G0
Fig. 4-166 DSC Oxidation of Dispersion Medium Heating Rate p: 20 K/min Atmosphere: Air, Pressure 1 bar, Flow Rate 5 cm3/min
600
i
0
4 12
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Fig. 4-167 DSC Oxidation of n-Hexacontane Heating Rate p: 20 K/min Atmosphere: Air, Pressure 50 bar, Flow Rate 5 cm3/min
4.9.2.1 Range of low temperature oxidation (LTO) The increase of pressure effects a shift of the peak maximum temperatures towards lower values (Table 4-197) at equal heating rates. The dependence of the activation energy E and the frequency factor logA on the pressure are shown in figs. 4-168 and 4-169. Now Table 4-197: Relation of the peak maximum temperature ("C) of the low temperature oxidation (LTO) on pressure in oxidation in air Heating rate p = 10 K/min Sample No. (bar)
1 2 3 4 5
Pressure
n-Hexacontane n-Hex ylpyrene Vacuum residue Asphaltenes Dispersion medium
1
10
20
50
24 1 310 319 326 331
223 300 282 303 287
22 1 277 272 272 268
218 270 256 256 238
4.9 Relation of the kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions
I
!i i I
i
-**-t4 I
Fig. 4-168 DSC Oxidation in Air, LTO Range Activation Energy E versus Pressure P Curve 1: n-Hexacontane Curve 4: Asphaltenes from 3 Curve 2: n-Hexylpyrene Curve 5: Dispersion Medium from 3 Curve 3: Vacuum Residue
Fig.4-169 DSC Oxidation in Air, LTO Range Frequency (Pre-Exponential) Factor log A versus Pressure P Curve 1: n-Hexacontane Curve 4: Asphaltenes from 3 Curve 2: n-Hexylpyrene Curve 5: Dispersion Medium from 3 Curve 3: Vacuum Residue
413
414
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
the n-hexylpyrene reacts similarly to the other substances in the LTO range. It may be observed that the rise in pressure, which implies an increase of the oxygen partial pressure, causes an asymptotic slope of the curves of E and log A versus the pressure P. This will be reflected by the half life times tIiz at the temperatures 200 'C, 250 O C , and 300 "C for example (Fig. 4-170 and 4-171). As expected the asphaltenes possess the highest oxidation stability in the LTO range, which is manifested by the high values of the activation energy, the frequency factor, and thereupon of the half life time. The low values for the kinetic coefficients E and log A for n-hexacontane do not noticably affect the half life times. In contrast to the values for Athabasca bitumen (Fig. 4- lSS), the real systems tested display higher values for their half life times, by approximate half a power of ten.
Fig.4-170 DSC Oxidation in Air, LTO Range Half Life Time tl,* versus Pressure P Parameter: Temperature Curve 1: n-Hexacontane Curve 2: n-Hexylpyrene
4.9 Relation of the kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions
415
Fig. 4-1 71 DSC Oxidation in Air, LTO Range Half Life Time tllZ versus Pressure P Parameter: Temperature Curve 3: Vacuum Residue Curve 4: Asphaltenes Curve 5: Dispersion Medium
4.9.2.2 Range of fuel deposition In this range, oxidation and pyrolysis take place immediately consecutively or even parallel, so there is a choice as to whether the exothermal or the endothermal peak maxima should be evaluated. Since the peaks undoubtedly have an exothermal appearance at low heating rates and at low pressures, the temperatures of the exothermal summits were selected, even when several peaks were present in the range of fuel deposition. Sometimes it was difficult to coordinate the corresponding temperatures of the peaks at alternating heating rates, so each of the reciprocal Kelvin temperatures of adjoining peak maxima were
4 16
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on P e t d e u m and Petroleum Products
used to calculate the regression line. In spite of that, it was not possible to calculate an exact correlation of the activation energy or the frequency factor with the pressure. There is a trend towards a decrease of the kinetic coefficients as a consequence of a rise of the pressure. At a pressure of 50 bar neither n-hexylpyrene nor the dispersion medium displayed any peaks in the the range of fuel deposition. Additional experiments at 35 bar pressure also failed in this respect. On the other hand a second peak can be evaluated for the vacuum residue in the pressure range from 1-20 bar. The dependence of peak maximum temperatures on pressure is non-uniform as Table 4-198 shows. The peak maximum temperatures decrease due to increasing pressures for n-hexacontane, n-hexylpyrene, and asphaltenes, which indicates that oxidation predominates. For the vacuum residue and the dispersion medium the peak maximum temperatures increase as consequence of increasing pressure, which indicates that pyrolysis predominates. The plots of activation energy E and frequency factor log A versus pressure P are given in Fig. 4-172 and 4-173. The half life times at equal temperatures of n-hexacontane, n-hexylpyrene, and asphaltenes decrease as a result of the increase of pressure. On the
300
250
200
150
Fig. 4-1 72 DSC Oxidation in Air, Fuel Deposition Range Activation Energy E versus Pressure P Curve 1: n-Hexacontane Curve 2: n-Hexylpyrene Curve 3: Vacuum Residue Curve 4: Asphaltenes Curve 5 : Dispersion Medium
4.9 Relation of the kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions
417
contrary, the values of the vacuum residue and of the dispersion medium rise (Fig. 4-174 and 4-175). The vacuum residue alone supplies two pairs of Arrhenius coefficients at pressures from 1 bar to 20 bar in the range of fuel deposition (Fig. 4-176 and Fig. 4-177). The half life time exhibits a sharp increase caused by the pressure increase similar to the behavior of the activation energy and the frequency factor (Fig. 4-178). This behavior also indicates the predomination of the pyrolysis reaction. Table 4-198: Relation of the maximum temperature ("C) of the fuel deposition peak on the pressure in oxidation in air Heating rate p = 10 K/min Sample No. (bar)
1 2 3 4 5
Pressure
n-Hexacontane n-Hexylpyrene Vacuum residue Asphaltenes Dispersion medium
1
10
20
50
334 427 408 420 409
298 412 435 396 429
285 390 429 385 442
276
Frequency (Pre-Exponential) Factor log A versus Pressure P Curve 1: n-Hexacontane Curve 2: n-Hexylpyrene Curve 3: Vacuum Residue Curve 4: Asphaltenes Curve 5: Dispersion Medium
-
452 363 -
418
4 Therrnoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Fig. 4-174 DSC Oxidation in Air, Fuel Deposition Range Half Life Time t1,2 versus Pressure P Parameter: Temperature Curve 1: rz-Hexacontane Curve 2: n-Hexylpyrene
4.9 Relation of the kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions
I
I
!
I
I
I
415
I
Fig. 4-175 DSC Oxidation in Air, Fuel Deposition Range Half Life Time t,,2 versus Pressure P Parameter: Temperature Curve 3: Vacuum Residue Curve 4: Asphaltenes Curve 5: Dispersion Medium
4
P (bar)
D
Fig. 4-176 DSC Oxidation in Air, Fuel Deposition Range Activation Energy E versus Pressure P Second Value for Vacuum Residue
420
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Fig. 4-177 DSC Oxidation in Air, Fuel Deposition Range Frequency (Pre-Exponential) Factor log A versus Pressure P Second Value for Vacuum Residue
Fig. 4-178 DSC Oxidation in Air, Fuel Deposition Range Half Life Time t,,* verus Pressure P Parameter: Temperature Second Value for Vacuum Residue
4.9 Relation of the kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reuctions
421
4.9.2.3 Range of fuel combustion The last peak becomes wider and flatter as a consequence of the rise of pressure. This peak represents the combustion of deposited coke, generated by cracking reactions in the preceding reaction range. Moreover the increase of pressure causes a shift of the peak maxima towards lower temperatures (at equal heating rates) except for n-Hexylpyrene, as Table 4-199: Relation of the maximum temperature ("C) of the fuel combustion peak on the pressure in oxidation in air Heating rate fi = 10 K/min Sample No. (bar)
Pressure
1
10
20
50
499 510 513 519 526 592
487 540 493 491 489 537
475 550 455 444 473 504
462 552 452 404 454 482
~
n-Hexacontane n-Hexylpyrene Vacuum residue Asphaltenes Dispersion medium Charcoal
1 2 3 4 5 6
200
150
100
50
Fig. 4-179 DSC Oxidation in Air, Fuel Combustion Range Activation Energy E versus Pressure P Curve 1: n-Hexacontane Curve 2: n-Hexylpyrene Curve 3: Vacuum Residue Curve 4: Asphaltenes Curve 5 : Dispersion Medium Curve 6: Activated Carbon (Charcoal)
422
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
shown in Table 4-199. For comparison, the data of activated carbon (charcoal) measured under identical experimental conditions are also presented (No. 6 in Table 4-199). The plots of activation energy E and frequency factor log A versus pressure P are shown in figs. 4-179 and 4-180. The coke generated from the asphaltenes exhibits the minor slopes for the E = f(P) and log A = f(P) curves (sample No. 4). Figs. 4-181 and 4-182 show the plots of half life time tl,* versus pressure P. The slope of the curves becomes flatter as a consequence of increasing pressure. The coke from n-hexacontane (sample No. 1) reaches the asymptote at 20 bar pressure. The behavior of the coke from n-hexylpyrene (sample No. 2) is completely different: here the tl,2 = f(P) cnrves increase firstly due to increasing pressure and pass through a maximum at 20 bar pressure. The curves of the coke residues of all the other substances resemble that of activated carbon (sample No. 6 in Fig. 4-182). In Fig. 4-182, the curve of the coke from the dispersion medium (sample No. 5 ) was omitted for clarity since it is nearly the same as that of the coke from the vacuum residue.
Fig. 4-180 DSC Oxidation in Air, Fuel Combustion Range Frequency (Pre-Exponential) Factor log A versus Pressure P Curve 1: n-Hexacontane Curve 2: n-Hexylpyrene Curve 3: Vacuum Residue Curve 4: Asphaltenes Curve 5: Dispersion Medium Curve 6: Activated Carbon (Charcoal)
4.9 Relation of the kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions
Fig. 4-181 DSC Oxidation in Air, Fuel Combustion Range Half Life Time t1,2versus Pressure P Parameter: Temperature Curve 1: n-Hexacontane Curve 2: n-Hexylpyrene
423
424
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Fig. 4-182 DSC Oxidation in Air, Fuel Combustion Range Half Life Time t1,2versus Pressure P Parameter: Temperature Curve 3: Vacuum Residue Curve 4: Asphaltenes Curve 6: Activated Carbon (Charcoal)
4.9.3 Discussion In chapter 4.9 the results of a first experimental series of the investigation using DSC, of the dependence of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions on pressure are described. First of all the experimental difficulties were rather underestimated by the author. Regulation of the system pressure by pre-setting the pressure on the gas inlet valve sometimes leads to incorrect values since the readings of high pressure reduction valves are too insensitive. That is also true for the manometer installed in the base of the pressure DSC cell. When working with a gas flow, it is advisable to measure the gas pressures at both the gas inlet and the gas outlet of the DSC cell. The application of a gas flow is required in order to guarantee a constant pressure even during variations of temperature. On the other hand the gas flow should help to avoid any condensation of evaporated components within the instrumentation and to avoid reverse reactions as much as possible. Nevertheless there is a
4.9 Relation of the kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation. reactions
425
danger of alterations to the gas flow rate during the test run, caused by obstruction of the outlet valve by reaction products, such as coke etc., leading to faulty results. We may wish to consider whether the gas flow rate selected in this first experimental series was the optimum already. For these reasons the measured data sometimes showed scattered distribution. The results presented in this chapter all derive from regression calculations, which exhibit coefficients of correlation of at least r 2 0.85. The results should not be regarded as representing absolute values, but they do demonstrate clear trends. During pyrolysis n-hexylpyrene seems to evaporate (sublimate) in spite of high pressures. Although values of the half life time increase due to increasing pressure in spite of a decrease of E and log A, this is a consequence of the mode of calculation as discussed already. n-Hexacontane also demonstrates a different shape of the curves for E = f(P) and log A = f(P) from the petroleum products. The choice of these two substances for modelling the pyrolysis behavior of petroleum products was not very valuable. In the oxidation test the behavior of the substances does not differ so much from that of petroleum products. Generally we have to ask whether using pure individual chemicals to model the pyrolysis and oxidation behavior of multi-component systems makes much sense. The values of the real systems, obtained from experiments at pressures up to 50 bar, may be extrapolated to still higher pressures since E = f(P) and log A = f(P) are continuous functions. The supply of oxygen in the oxidation experiments at 50 bar pressure is sufficient to ensure attainment of the asymptotic limits at least in the first reaction step (LTO). Evaluation of the second reaction step of the oxidation (fuel deposition) is more difficult because an increase of the heating rate provokes the occurrence of additional peaks, which will be flattened as a consequence of a rise of the pressure. For the consecutive and parallel oxidation and pyrolysis reactions in this step, overall values of E and log A have been found, which only give steady functions for the vacuum residue. The data of the last reaction step (fuel combustion) may be evaluated very easily. They also give steady functions for E = f(P) and log A = f(P). All substances tested behave similarly to activated carbon (charcoal). Only the coke residue of n-hexylpyrene reacts completely differently and demonstrates different curves in the plots of the reaction rate constant and the half life time versus the pressure. In this reaction step the curves did not reach the asymptote even at pressures of 50 bar, but they may be extrapolated to higher pressures. There is some uncertainty about all the results since the total conversions can only be ascertained after the termination of the three reaction steps. So the conversion levels at the individual peak maxima of the curves of energy flow versus temperature are unknown. It has been proven by simultaneous TGA/DTA experiments that an isoconversion exists at the maximum of energy flow, independent of the heating rate, which is the condition for the applicabilityof ASTM E 698-79. Howevers the conversionlevel does not influence the external calculation according to ASTM, whereas the DSC software (DSCASTMKin v1.00) comprehends the Ozawa correction [3-181 for the dependence of the activation energy upon the conversion level. Since that conversion level is not known during the DSC experiments, the total conversion after termination of the experiments was found by weighing the sample cup. This total conversion of the pyrolysis was fed into the computer
426
4 Therrnoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
program. The calculation for oxidation experiments was performed with the input of 100 % conversion since there was no residue after the experiment. Evaluation of thermogravimetric experiments according to Flynn and Wall gives slightly higher values of E and log A than DSC experiments. This deviation appears in the values for pyrolysis and low temperature oxidation, as well as for fuel deposition, because of the low conversion levels. However the results from a high pressure thermobalance would fit more exactly. If the reaction rate constants computed using the Arrhenius equation, are published then the values should be given for several temperatures at considerable intervals so that
Fig. 4-183 Oxidation in Air of Activated Carbon and Graphite Half Life Time t1,2versus Temperature (Pressure 1 bar)
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
427
extrapolation is possible. The statement of an activation energy alone does not suffice. The corresponding frequency factors should be also stated. For example, in the oxidation of graphite in1 bar air an activation energy E = 153.36 kJ/Mole and a frequency factor logA = 6.433 min-' have been ascertained. For activated carbon (charcoal) at 7 bar air pressure an nearly equal activation energy E = 154.36 kJ/Mole results but the frequency factor differs by nearly three powers of ten (log A = 9.267 min-I). In the diagram of log t,,2 versus 1000lT' E governs the slope of the line but the intercept is governed by the frequency factor A. Therefore the lines for the two substances are parallel but with a distance of nearly three powers of ten (Fig. 4-183). It is well known from the literature that the chemical composition of the mineral matrix in petroleum reservoirs influences the course of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions. In order to simulate the conditions in petroleum reservoirs, the experiments should be carried out with the addition of finely ground acidic or basic minerals to the organic material. It would be important to add equal quantities of mineral powder to the sample and to the reference pan.
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs for investigation of kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions of heavy petroleum products Four different methods are in use to investigate the dependence of the reaction kinetics on temperature in thermoanalysis, as described in chapter 3.3. The suppliers of instrumentation offer different software packages for that subject. The application of such software to specified inorganic and organic chemicals, to model blends thereof, and to polymers, proceeds without particular difficulties, and has been widely published. Very few publications deal with the application to petroleum and its products, and these are sometimes contradictory. Investigations on the pyrolysis kinetics of oil shale, shale oils, and kerogens have been described in References [4-98 to 4-1021 and [4-47 to 4-51], and investigations on native bitumens in References [4-96,4-1001. Very little has been published yet on the oxidation behavior of crude oils [4-103,4-1041, of native bitumens [4-961, or of oil shale [4-1051. There are few publications on the cracking and oxidation behavior of distillation residues [4-20, 4-46, 4-1061. There is to date no systematic comparison of the different methods of investigation of reaction kinetics. That is understandable since petroleum and its products (especially the distillation and conversion residues) are multi-component systems of an unknown number of non-defined species in variable quantities. The kinetic constants which have been found, are average or overall values of a series of parallel or consecutive reations. That average value does, for the most part, describe the behavior of the multi-component system in the
428
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
respective process very well. However, petroleum is manufactured by thermal processes, and thermal methods of analysis are most appropriate. A comparative investigation of the applicability of commercial kinetics software was carried out using: - DuPont de Nemours 9900 (990) Thermal Analyzer equipped with pressure DSC cell. Software: DSCASTMKin v. 1.00 (Kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79) - Stanton-Redcroft Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer STA 780 (STA 1000) for TGA, DTG, and DTA. Software: ASTM E 698-79 Borchardt and Daniels Flynn and Wall McCarty and Green Version C 4.20 The principles of the methods are described in chapter 3.3. The behavior of a vacuum residue from a Venezuelan crude was simulated by a distillation bitumen B80 (according to DIN 1995). Further, a vacuum residue of a Middle East crude (VR Kuwait) and its colloid components, i.e. dispersion medium, petroleum resins, and asphaltenes were investigated. Those substances were characterizedby element analysis and average relative particle weight (molecular weight) (Table 4-200) and by analysis of their colloid composition according to Neumann [4-101 (Table 4-201). The pyrolysis reactions were carried out in argon and the oxidation in air in a temperature range from room temperature up to 600 "C (DSC) or 800 "C (STA), applying heating rates p= 5, 10,20, and 50 K/min. The gases had constant flow rates of 5 cm3/min(DSC) or 50 cm3/min(STA). DSC experiments were performed using open aluminum pans (SFI pan from DuPont). In the STA the flat platinum pan (TG 750 crucibles from Stanton-Redcroft) was used. An empty pan was used for reference in each case. Sample weights were in the range from 1 to 3 mg. Table 4-200: Elemental Analysis and average molecular weight. -
Substance Bitumen B80 VR Kuwait Dispersion medium Petroleum resins Asphaltenes
C
H
N
S
H~CatoInar
M
85.13 83.92 83.69 82.46 82.54
10.28 9.84 10.39 10.14 8.08
0.60 0.33 0.32 0.49 1.08
3.21 5.02 4.61 4.91 7.23
1.449 1.407 1.490 1.476 1.175
865 1045 792 1196 6092
Table 4-201: Colloid composition (wt %). Substance Bitumen B80 VR Kuwait
Dispersion medium
Petroleum resins
Asphaltenes
59.60 71.76
21.83 10.50
18.57 17.65
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
429
Sometimes plots which are produced from the oxidation experiments cannot be evaluated as described above. That happens when the generation of heat occurs so fast that the sample temperature overruns the pre-set heating rate. Smaller sample weights and/or faster heating rates may help to avoid this effect. The DuPont software allows the diagram of heat flow versus time to be called up (to the monitor). After marking the peak maxima, the diagram can be rescaled to heat flow versus temperature and the correct peak maximum temperatures can then be defined. Unfortunately this information cannot be processed by the DSCASTMKin software, so the data are used in external computation of the reaction kinetics.
4.10.1 Pyrolysis reaction 4.10.1.1 Kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79 4.10.1.1.1 DSC (DTA) experiments The pyrolysis of petroleum and its products is characterized by the appearance of only one endothermal peak in the plot of heat flow versus temperature, above 400 "C. Sometimes additional flat peaks will be found below 400 OC, and these represent evaporation processes. The software DSCASTMKm v l .OO (DuPont) supplies the following information, which is shown as plots of the pyrolysis of bitumen B80: Heat Flow versus Temperature log (Heat Rate) versus 1 00O/T Data File Summary (Table) Kinetic Parameters at Different Conversion Levels (Table) Rate Constant and Half Life Time versus Temperature (Table) Half Life Time versus Temperature Specific Rate Constant k versus Temperature % Conversion versus Time (Isothermal) Conversion Time versus Temperature (Isoconversion)
(Fig. 4-184) (Fig. 4-185) (Fig. 4-186) (Fig. 4-187) (Fig. 4-188) (Fig. 4-189) (Fig. 4-190) (Fig. 4-191) (Fig. 4-192)
430
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
-aeof +-------^TI--
250
300
350
--.-r-------
400 Tenporoturo C * U
Fig. 4-184 DSC Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 Heat Flow versus Temperature Parameter: Heating Rate p Atmosphere: Argon 5 cm3/min
450
r----i sw
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
43 1
I
0.8+---------7-
1.380
1.31s
1.370
---r----r-.-1--r---T-1.37s 1.3~0 1.385 1.380 1.3~s 1.400 1000/T
Fig. 4-185 DSC Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 log Heating Rate versus 1000/T Kinetics according ASTM E 698-79
1.405
1.
10
432
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Activation energy: 240.1 kJ/mole Log Cpreaxponential factor)s 17.051 l/mln 60 mln half-life tenporutvro8 387.4 OC Heat o f reaction8 -218.8 Jfg Convereion level: Peak (cureor)
Temperature Temperature
.C K -----------_------400.0 425.0 450.0 475.0 soo. 0 525.0 550.0
673.2 898.2 723.2 748.2 773.2 788.2 823.2
iO~O/Tamp.
1fK
.---------I. 488 1.432 1.383 1.337 1.293 1.253 i . 215
Half-L ife
-------slln
28.48 5.897 I. 363 0.3589
0.1030 0.031W 0.01085
Fig. 4-188 DSC Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 Rate Constant k and Half Life Time versus Temperature (Table) Kinetics according ASTM E 698-79
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
-_
30 rl______.__l___
__________
433
__ .___ 1
I I _
Eactt 240.1 XJ/mla Log C f ) t 17.051 l/nln
,
60 nln 1/2 1lCa Entholpyt -218.8 Convm-miont Po&
i---,----t-----r------7--C-----.-7-3-T----i 400
420
440
480 480 500 Tanparaturn (93
Fig. 4-189 DSC Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 Half Life Time versus Temperature Kinetics according ASTM E 698-79
520
540
560
434
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
7oT---.---.-.-
--
____I_-_.__I.
E n o t t 240.1 KJ/nola
L o g 0 8 17.051 l/mln 60 ain 1/Z ltfaa 387.4.C
Entholpys -218. B J/g Canvermlona Peak (cureor)
I
II
/
Fig. 4-190 DSC Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 Specific Rate Constant k versus Temperature Kinetics according ASTM E 698-79
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
435 1
&-- .
-
,
0
-- T^I-Ic----)--------~-----~5
1s
10
Tina
Fig. 4-191 DSC Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 Percent Conversion versus Time (Isothermal) Kinetics according ASTM E 698-79
20
25
436
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
-KJ/molo Log(z>a 17.0S1 l/mln Eocta 240.1
60 ain 1/2 life1 387.4-C Enthalpy: -218.8 J/g Convermiona Po& (cursor1
t - - - - - - - r - - - l - ~
380
400
420
440
480 480 Twporaturs C 0 O
500
Fig. 4-192 DSC Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 Conversion Time versus Temperature (Isoconversion) Kinetics according ASTM E 698-79
520
540
.0
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
437
The DSC only measures energetic data and does not supply any information on conversion. However, in ASTM E 698-79 the dependence of kinetic parameters on the level of conversion is not described (eq. 3-10 and eq. 3-13). Only the occurrence of the peak maxima at equal conversion levels is required, independent of the heating rate. But the DSCASTMKin v1.00 software includes a correction for the dependence of kinetic parameters on the conversion level, introduced for DSC tests by Ozawa [3-181. This correction is not present in the software version C 4.20 for the Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer, STA 790 (STA 1000). Since it is not possible to obtain information on the conversion level at peak maximum temperature, the total conversions were determined by weighing the sample cup after termination of the test runs. This value may be fed to the computer program, DSCASTMKin v l .OO, which offers three alteranatives for calculation of the kinetic parameters. One comprises the automatic detection of the peak maximum temperatures; one is the determination of peak maximum temperatures by setting the cursor; and the third permits calculation of the kinetic parameters at different pre-set conversion levels. Fig. 4-185 shows the regression line of the temperature data in the plot of log (Heat Rate) versus 1 OOO/T; these data were obtained by setting the cursor manually. A check by thermogravimetry proves that the temperatures of the DSC peak maxima correspond to those of the DTG peak maxima when the conversion level is 57 %. Fig. 4-193 shows the regression lines for five different conversion levels (25,50,57,75, and 80 %) in the plot of log (heating rate) versus 1 OOO/T. These data do not satisfactorily fit the regression line at lower conversion levels. At 25 % conversion the regression line has a positive slope, which is mathematically correct but physically irrational. Computation of the kinetic parameters gives a positive activation energy for 25 % conversion, a value of -360 kJ/Mol for 57 9% conversion, and -273 kJ/Mol for 80 % conversion, which are clearly incorrect. Therefore have we used a computation based on data obtained either by setting the cursor manually, or by feeding the total conversion after termination of the reaction into the program. The plot log (heating rate) versus 1 000/T presents a useful control of the accuracy of the peak maximum temperatures of each individual test run. Ideally the data of at least three test runs should fit a straight line in the diagram, otherwise the program will calculate a regression line using the method of least squares. The slope of the line is equivalent to the term EIR. That sometimes implies considerable deviation of the activation energy E (see chapter 4.10.3). No information is provided on the coefficient of correlation and therefore it is not possible to evaluate the scatter. The results of the DSC experiments are presented in Table 4-202. The software of the Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer, STA 780 (STA 1000)also allows the ASTM E 698-79 method to be used. Unfortunately there is no computer program to process data from simultaneous TGA/DTA (TGA/DSC) test runs. For computation according to ASTM E 698-79 only separately sampled DTA (DSC) data can be used, so the advantage of a simultaneous measuring instrumentation cannot be fully realized. The conversion levels at peak maximum temperatures are also unknown, and the total conversion can only be ascertained after termination of the test run. The installed software version C 4.20 offers plots similar to those of the DSCASTMKin v1.00:
438
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
1.
I.
3 8
dgr -I
lo 0.
0.
0.
0.
i0
Fig. 4-193 DSC Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 log Heating Rate versus Temperature at Different Conversion Levels Kinetics according ASTM E 698-79
Table 4-202: Pyrolysis kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79 A) Results from DSC experiments No.
Substance
1 2 3 4 5
Bitumen B80 Bitumen B80 VR Kuwait VR Kuwait Dispersion medium from 3 Petroleum resins from 3 Asphaltenes from 3
6 7 ~~
~
E (kJ/Mol)
log A (min-')
Conversion (70)
273.8 240.1 211.7 229.1
19.249 17.051 15.016 16.231
80 57 83.7 81.4
239.3
16.877
89.2
223.1
15.579
80.2
220.6
15.42
50.9
~~
No. 1 to No. 3 from experiments in 1 bar argon No. 4 to No. 7 from experiments in 10 bar methane
439
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
Raw Date plot corresponds to Heat Flow versus Temperature In (Heating Rate) versus 1 000/K corresponds to log (Heat Rate) versus 1 000/T The following plots are identical: Half Life Time versus Temperature % Conversion versus Time (Isothermal) Conversion Time versus Temperature (Isoconversion) In the plot of Reaction Rate Constant k versus Temperature, the program version C 4.20 uses In k, whereas DSCASTMKin v1.00 uses the absolute value k. The kinetic parameters computed according to ASTM E 698-79 from DTA data of the Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer are presented in Table 4-203 No. 1 and No. 2. Table 4-203: Pyrolysis kinetics according to ASTM E 698-97, experiments with Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer. No.
Data from
Substance
E (kJ/Mol)
log A (min-')
Conversion*
(%I ~~~~
8 9 10 11 12
~
Bitumen B80 VR Kuwait Bitumen B8O Bitumen B80 VR Kuwait VR Kuwait Dispersion medium from 2 Dispersion medium from 2 Petroleum resins from 2 Petroleum resins from 2 Asphaltenes from 2 Asphaltenes from 2
DTA DTA DTA DTG DTA DTG
214.5 212.7 195.2 193.5 209.4 209.4
15.003 14.986 13.365 13.452 15.073 15.073
53.9 55.5 52.3 52.0
DTA
188.1
12.243
57.7
DTG DTA DTG DTA DTG
190.5 190.7 206.8 211.6 224.1
13.366 13.161 14.252 14.782 15.567
59.7 36.0 34.0 23.7 23.0
-
No. 1 and No. 2 from separately collected DTA data No. 3 to No. 12 externally computed using peak maximum temperatures of simultaneous TGA/DTA measurements * conversion at the temperatures of peak maxima
4.10.1.1.2 Kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79 from simultaneous TGA/DTA experiments The standard evaluation program of the Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer STA 750 supplies the plots of TGA and DTA versus temperature. In addition, the curve of the first differential quotient of the weight loss with respect to time dGldt (DTG) may be plotted (Fig. 4-194). The peak maximum temperatures from both DTA and DTG may be determined quite easily and used to calculate the activation energy and frequency factor. There is no program to process such data, so the calculation is done on an external computer. The
440
4 Thennoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
I00
-
90
-
80
-
-n
70
-
>
60
-
1
*to
POINT TABLE
-
0
1
1.2
--
0
C
-
L
-
; 1.0 m
.a
--
k
0
-
.6--
-
+I 0
50
-
40
-
30
-
20
0
-I
4
L
o.
--
4J
4J
C
1.4
.4-
.2
463.8 1bO
2b0
3b0
4b0
c 5bO
7b0
8bO
-
0.0 --.a --
RESIDUE 22.59 L 6b0
-
gb0
Fig. 4-194 Pyrolysis of Petroleum Resins from Vacuum Residue Kuwait STA Diagram: TGA, DTA, DTG Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 30 + 20 cm3/min
advantage of this kind of experiment is the easy determination of the conversion levels at both the maximum heat flow (DTA) and the maximum reaction rate (DTG). The experiments prove that isoconversions at the corresponding DTA and DTG maxima are independent of the heating rates, so ASTM E 698-79 may be applied. The results of this investigation are given in Table 4-203 (No. 3 - No. 12).
4.10.1.2 Kinetics according to Borchardt and Daniels Software only for the Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer STA 780 was available for kinetics according to Borchardt and Daniels. Similarly to the kinetics program accordingto ASTM E 698-79, only separately sampled DTA data can be processed using the Borchardt and Daniels program. The DTA data from simultaneousTGA/DTA experiments cannot be
-6
-7 -8 -0
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
441
processed. Moreover the program can only process the data from positive (exothermic) peaks, but that can be overcome easily by exchanging the positions of the sample pan and the empty reference pan on the pan platform. Evaluation of the DTA curve is rather difficult. The main uncertainty is based on the correct selection of the integration limits. How should the DTA curve be interpreted? Experience tells us that no pyrolysis reactions occur in the temperature region below 400 O C , but the DTA pyrolysis curve of bitumen B80 demonstrates an onset point in the range of 250 "C (Fig. 4-195). Is that the start temperature of the pyrolysis reaction or does evaporation still take place up to 400 "C or 410 O C , where the DTA curve exhibis another point of inflexion? Using the temperatures of 400 "C and 500 "C as integration limits the calculation gives unrealistically high values of activation energy, E = 338.7 kJ/Mole, of frequency factor log A = 24.368 min-', and of reaction order n = 3.13. Pyrolysis reactions
-6
-
-e
-
-10
4
6
Taperrturc Limits: 400
I
100
'\\
- 500 'C
I
200
1
300
I
I
400
OOQ
Fig. 4-195 Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 STA Diagram: DTA Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 30 + 20 cm3/min Kinetics according Borchardt and Daniels Integration Limits: 400 "C and 500 "C
c
500
I
600
I
700
e
442
4 Thennoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
normally obey a first order law with n = 1. The choice of 250 "C and 5 10 "C as integration limits gives E = 75.4 kJ/Mole, log A = 4.795 min-', and II = 1.17. Those values favor an evaporation process. It is possible to find reaction orders in the vicinity of the unity combined with acceptable values of the kinetic parameters by trial and error (Table 4-204). Since the lack of thermogravimetric data increases the uncertainity of the interpretation of the DTA curves, we have decided not to use the Borchardt and Daniels method. Table 4-204: Pyrolysis kinetics of bitumen B80. Evaluation of DTA curves according to Borchardt and Daniels. Experiments with Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer. Temperature limits ("C)
Reaction order n
E (kJ/Mol)
log A (min-')
260 - 510 300 - 510 330 - 510 375 - 500 372.5 - 505 376.5 - 515 377.5 - 500 380 - 510
1.17 1.076 0.77 0.92 1.13 1.16 1.17 1.41
75.435 93.171 102.330 158.87 164.77 176.36 175.81 196.55
4.7946 6.1196 6.7403 10.9354 11.4045 12.2645 12.2210 13.7758
4.10.1.3 Kinetics according to Flynn and Wall This method is based on the evaluation of the curves of at ,:ast three TGA experiments at different heating rates. Fig. 4-196 shows the plot of the pyrolysis of bitumen B80 at a heating rate p = 10 K/min. There is only a small difference between the DTA and DTG maximum temperatures within the limits of the method. At peak maximum the conversion is still incomplete and amounts to only 57 % whereas the total conversion is 80 %. For evaluation according to Flynn and Wall, sections of the curve comprising the regions of special interest may be called up or the whole curve may be evaluated. Fig. 4-197 represents the raw data plot of three pyrolysis experiments on bitumen B80 at different heating rates. The lines of isoconversion may be set independently by random entry or selected manually, so any points of special interest in the thermogram may be marked. This is particularly important if the TGA curve consists of different regions possessing different slopes, for example in the oxidation test (see chapter 4.10.2.3). The evaluation program presents the following plots: In Heating Rate versus 1 000/Kelvin Arrhenius Plot: In k versus 1 000/Kelvin Specific Rate Constant versus Temperature Half Life Time versus Temperature
(Fig. 4-198) (Fig. 4-199) (Fig. 4-200) (Fig. 4-201)
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
Isothermal: Percent Conversion versus Time Isoconversion: Time versus Temperature Activation Energy versus % Conversion Table of Results
443
(Fig. 4-202) (Fig. 4-203) (Fig. 4-204) (Fig. 4-205)
I10
9
100
E
90
7
70
5 ;
Q
0
4
k I
.?I
50
3
40
2
30
1
20
0
10
-1
Fig. 4-196 Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 STA Diagram: TGA, DTA, DTG Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 30 + 20 cm3/min
444
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
100
-
.4
90
-
.3
80
-
.2
70
-
.l
60
-
0.0
a
U
iu
> 0
U
k a
;
50
-
-.:
40
-
-.2
30
-
-.3
20
-
-.4
10 200
250
3b0
I 350
A0
4bO -g
-.5 I 500
c
Fig. 4-197 Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 STA-Diagram: Raw Data Plot, Lines of lsoconversion Heating Rate p : 5, 10, 20 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 20 + 30 cm3/dn Kinetics according Flynn and Wall
5bO
&I0
650
k
...I
..
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
445
3.4
3.2
;3 . 0 4J
W
a m
2.8
C
. I
2.6
m
I 2.4
.-I
2.2 2.0
1.E
1.6
0
I
1.35
1.I40
I
1.45
I
1.W
1000/Kelvin
1.?i5
I
1.60
1
1.65
Fig. 4-198 Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 STA Diagram: In Heating Rate versus 1000,lKelvin at Different Conversion Levels Kinetics according Flynn and Wall
1
446
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
3.0 2.5 2.0
-t . I
Y
1.0
-s
C H
0.0
-.I -1.0
-1.5 -2.0
Fig. 4-199 Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 STA Arrhenius Plot: In k versus 1 000/Kelvin Kinetics according Flynn and Wall
441
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
16
-
14
-
iz
-
10
-
----
1
ill
- - - - ~
/
/
8 -
64-
2-
0-
+
340
'
I
360
I
I
400
4h0
I
440
neg c
I
460
Fig. 4-200 Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 STA Diagram: Specific Rate Constant k versus Temperature Kinetics according Flynn and Wall
4b0
I
500
!O
448
4 Thermoanalyticul Investigations on Petroleum und Petroleum Products
3.3
3.0
-5
2.5
E
Y
m
y.
2.0
J y.
n
2
1.5
1.0
.5
0.0 3i0
3kO
!
I
380
400
I
460
440
Fig. 4-201 Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 STA Diagram: Half Life Time versus Temperature Kinetics according Flynn and Wall
4k0
I
I
480
500
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
Fig. 4-202 Pyrolysis of Bitumen I380 STA Diagram: Percent Conversion versus Time (Isothermal at 450 "C) Kinetics according Flynn and Wall
449
450
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
3.5
3.0
i!
-
j
I II
2.1 E ."
L-
'D
2.0
-
I
-
1
I
4
m
L
-
1.5 0
0
1.0
-
.5
-
0.0
380
i
j I
1
!
702
4bO
I
420
I
440
I
460
I
480
Fig. 4-203 Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 STA Diagram: Conversion Time versus Temperature (Isoconversion, Conversion Level 70 %) Kinetics according Rynn and Wall
I
500
I
520
540
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
C ~ m n x mw x
I m QDeR
ACTIVATION -I PFII!+xm”lIAL
-
451
1 1
Z RJ/uelm J :
CACTaR l L / u l n l :
XOC.67SS
P. 1 ~ B a . c + i 4
Fig. 4-205 Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 STA Diagram: Table of Kinetic Results Kinetics according Flynn and Wall
Table 4-205: Pyrolysis kinetics according to Flynn and Wall. Experiments with Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer. No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12
Substance Bitumen B80 BitumenB80 Bitumen B80 VRKuwait VRKuwait VRKuwait Dispersion medium from 4 Dispersion medium from 4 Petroleum resins from 4 Petroleum resins from 4 Asphaltenes from 4 Asphaltenes from 4
E (kJ/Mol)
log A (min-I) Conversion (%)
213.23 202.77 190.85 202.53 180.30 182.31
14.708 14.160 14.050 13.980 12.610 12.786
70 (Max.Conversion) 56 (DTG Maximum ) 54 (DTA Maximum) 83 (Max. Conversion) 52 (DTG Maximum) 51 (DTA Maximum)
213.30
14.643
94 (Max. Conversion)
198.15 329.72 230.77 253.89 218.75
14.025 20.060 15.975 16.873 15,955
60 (DTG Maximum ) 75 (Max. Conversion) 34 (DTG Maximum) 53 (Max. Conversion) 23 (DTG Maximum)
In experiments No. 8, 10 and 12 the temperature data of DTG and DTA give identical values.
452
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
-m
-
220
-
210
-
200
-
r (
\ 3 Y
-
----
-~
,-__-_--------
230
1
z
: 0
140
C
W
J
160
-
0
4
160
-
150
-
170
140 I
10
I
20
1
30
I
I
I
60 50 40 P e r c e n t Conversion '
Fig. 4-204 Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 STA Diagram: Activation Energy versus Percent Conversion Kinetics according Flynn and Wall
f0
1
80
I
9(
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
453
The plot of In Heating Rate versus 1 000/Kelvin is a useful control of the precision of the individual test runs. The plot of Activation Energy versus % Conversion and the Table of Results both enable comparison of this kind of evaluation with the results according to ASTM E 698-79, which were calculated for defined conversion levels. Table 4-205 shows the kinetic parameters determined according to Flynn and Wall. The values for maximum conversion and for conversion levels corresponding to the DTG maxima (which also equal the DTA maxima) are presented. The kinetic parameters for conversions at the DTG (DTA) maxima can be compared with the corresponding values found according to ASTM E 698-79 and given in Table 4-203.
4.10.1.4 Kinetics according to McCarty and Green The method of McCarty and Green is most useful since only one TGA experiment is required, but selection of the correct limits for the integration raises problems. If the limits are set to the two horizontal branches of the TGA curve, for example to 250 "C and 520 OC, then the values of the kinetic parameters of bitumen B80 will be far too small as shown in Fig. 4-206 with E = 120.18 kJ/Mol and log A = 8.160 m i d . We must consider which physical and/or chemical processes occur during the rise in temperature. Evaluation according to Borchardt and Daniels (chapter 4.10.1.3) revealed a heat flow in the temperature region far below 400 OC, as a consequence of some reaction. The TGA curve in Fig. 2-206 shows that weight loss begins below 400 "C, which is generally considered as the lower limit of the pyrolysis reaction. An experiment starting with an isothermal run at a temperature below 400 "C, followed by a dynamic run up to high temperatures, may clarify the behavior. For example, an isothermal run at 375 "C for 15 minutes is followed by a dynamic run using a heating rate p = 10 K/min up to 525 "C has been performed. At the end of the isothermal step a weight loss of 15 % is recorded, caused by evaporation. Subsequent integration using the limits 375 "C and 500 "C gives E = 173.72 kJ/Mol and log A = 12.086 min-l. These values are still a little bit low. The results most comparable to the other methods are obtained by selecting the onset and offset point temperatures as integration limits. From Fig. 4-207 it can be seen that about 15 % of the sample is evaporated at the onset point temperature (400.4 "C) while the residue at the offset point temperature (482.5 "C) is approx 24 %. Calculation using 250 "C and 400 "C as limits gives the kinetic parameters of evaporation, i.e. E = 109.82 kJ/Mol and log A = 8.360 min-'. Integration using the temperature of the onset point (400.4 "C) and offset point (482.5 "C) as limits gives E = 202.81 kJ/Mol and log A = 14.258 min-', which represent values for a pyrolysis reaction. When applying low heating rates the kinetic parameters do not show any significant dependence on the heating rates (Table 4-206, bitumen BSO). Table 4-207 shows the kinetic parameters of VR Kuwait and its components. The values for evaporation of the asphaltenes are already in the range of a pyrolysis reaction. The curve of pyrolysis of the petroleum resins shows two reaction regions with different slopes (Fig. 4-208). The first onset appears at 432 "C. The offset point of this branch of the curve is at the same time the
454 110
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products L i n i t r PL~O t o
SOp r d c
100
90 80 *I
m U L
a
70 60 90
nmw
40
30 20 10 I
100
2bO
1
300
I
400
Deg C
Fig. 4-206 Pyrolysis of Bitumen €380 STA Diagram: TGA Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 30 + 20 cm3/min Kinetics according McCarty and Green Integration Limits: 250 "C and 520 "C
5bO
I
600
I
700
I
0
455
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs 130
100
90
80 70 60
50 40
30 20
'
10
'
0
I
100
2b0
I
900
4b0
Fig. 4-207 Pyrolysis of Bitumen B80 STA Diagram: TGA Heating Rate p: 10 Klmin Atmosphere: Argon 30 + 20 cm3/min Onset Point and Offset Point Temperatures
5b0
6bO
7b0
456
100
C
m L 0
a
! i
-
go=-RERlJs
10
-
70
-
u
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
432
- 475 'C
I
i I I 1
REALTS 476
I
- 620 *C
i
50 60
!
I
40
I
!
30
20
0
1bo
260
I
300
1
400
dl0
nag c
Fig. 4-208 Pyrolysis of Petroleum resins from VR Kuwait STA Diagram: TGA Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Argon 30 + 20 cm3/min Integration Limits: 432 "C and 475 "C 475 "C and 620 "C
s60
I
700
1bO
900
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
457
Table 4-206: Pyrolysis kinetics of bitumen B80 according to McCarty and Green. Experiments with Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer
E (kJ/Mol)
Heating rate Temperature limits (K/min)
log A (min-I)
("C)
Weight loss at the upper temperature limit
(%I Evaporation 250. . . 389 (onset 1) 250. . ,400 (onset 1) 250. . .419 (onset 1)
5 10 20
Pyrolysis 389 (onset 1). . . 466 (onset 2) 400 (onset 1). . . 483 (onset 2) 419 (onset 1). . . 496 (onset 2)
5 10 20
109.71 109.82 116.51
8.1865 8.3602 8.9421
16.9 15.3 14.7
200.69
14.1014
76.9
202.81
14.2579
76.5
221.26
15.5999
76.1
Table 4-207: Pyrolysis kinetics according to McCarty and Green. Experiments with Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer. Heating Rate p= 10 K/min ~
Substance Temperature limits (OC)
Evaporation E (kJ/Mol)
log A (min-')
Temperature limits ("C)
Pyrolysis E (W/Mol)
log A (min-')
VR Kuwait Dispersion medium Petroleum resins
250.. ,395
118.44
9.1506
395.. ,490
187.88
13.2199
250. ..395 250 . . . 432
113.09 146.51
Asphaltenes
250 ... 430
214.20
8.6946 395 . . . 485 10.6836 432 . . . 475 475.. ,620 15.9212 430 ... 505
186.54 367.53 149.49 258.75
13.1157 26.0533 8.7684 17.9624
onset point of the second reaction and appears at 475 "C.The last offset point occurs at 620 "C.The two regions of reaction can be integrated separately:
1st reaction 2nd reaction
E (kJ/Mol) 367.53 149.49
log A (min-') 26.053 8.768
458
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
4.10.2 Oxidation reaction The oxidation reaction is a more complicated process than pyrolysis. In DTA or DSC the oxidation of pure chemicals always reveals three or more maxima at different temperatures in the plot of heat flow versus temperature. The TGA curves display more than one point of inflexion and the DTG and DSC (DTA) curves more than one peak maximum (Fig. 4-209 and 4-210). Although oxidation is not a first order reaction, it can be treated mathematically as a first order reaction with regard to the consumption of fuel, provided there is an excess of air (oxygen). Therefore the current computer programs can be used to examine the kinetics of oxidation.
110
------
I----
t
i POINT TABLE
c I (
IPt
I
70
6
536.D7
t
L
POXNT
I 0
TABLE
3a.9621 444.24 -1.0701 5 530.30-362.267 3
425.n.3
4
Lir-0
t
300
-
200
5.5051
U
a
'0°
$0
RESIDUE 1.71 I 3bo
Dog C
Fig. 4-209 Oxidation in Air of Bitumen B80 STA Diagram: TGA, DTA Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air 30 + 20 cm3/min
4bO
-
100
-
50
-
0
150
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
I
d
ib0
260
Fig. 4-210 Oxidation in Air of Bitumen B80 STA Diagram: TGA, DTG Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air 30 + 20 cm3/min
3bO
Dog c
4bO
d0
6bO
459
0
460
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
4.10.2.1 Kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79 4.10.2.1.1 DSC (DTA) experiments The DSC oxidation of bitumen B80 in air at a heating rate p = 5 K/min shown in Fig. 4-211 is taken as an example. The three regions of reaction are defined by distinct peaks. The LTO region is represented by only one peak between 303 "C (5 K/min) and 359 "C (50 K/min). Between 394 "C (5 K/min) and 478 "C (50 K/min) there are several more or less distinct peaks in the region of fuel deposition. The peaks of experiments at different heating rates are not easy to associate for evaluation. Unfortunately this can only be effected by trial and error. The safest but also the most time consuming method consists in the selection of the data which best fit the regression line in the plot of log (heating rate) versus 1 OOO/T. The evaluation is also more difficult because altering the heating rates
-20
!
0
I
100
I
200
4d0 T~peroturo(.C)
300
Fig. 4-211 DSC Oxidation in Air of Bitumen B80
General Data Plot Heating Rate p: 5 K/min Atmosphere: Air 5 cm3/min
I
500
.
800
7
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
461
changes the position and shape of the peaks and can cause peaks to disappear completely. The last region, representing fuel combustion, is marked by a very clear peak in the temperature range from 490 "C (5 Kimin) to 572 "C (50 Kimin). In Fig. 4-212 the plot of log (heating rate) versus 1 OOOlT for the LTO region shows that all data from the experiments fit the regression line perfectly. In the fuel deposition region only two sets of the peaks from four heating rates can be identified and provide two pairs of kinetic parameters. The last region (fuel combustion) also shows a good fit of the experimental data to the regression line. The values of the kinetic parameters for bitumen €380 and vacuum residue Kirkuk are presented in Table 4-208. The computer program of the STA 780 only processes separately sampled DTA data. Nevertheless the plot of heat flow versus temperature is virtually the same as the diagram produced using DSC (Fig. 4-213). Here again the LTO region exhibits only one peak, the
..- ,
P
1.0-
1.4n
8*
1.2-
0.8-
0.00.04
-0 0 . --~-.--1-7-+4.4
1.56 1.50
1.58
1
1.00
1.62
1.64 1000/T
1.68 c1m
Fig. 4-212 DSC Oxidation in Air of Bitumen B80 LTO Range Lag Heating Rate versus I000/T Kinetics according ASTM E 698-79
1.09
1-70
1.72
1. '4
Dispersion medium
4
Petroleum resins 5 Asphaltenes
3
Bitumen B80 2 VR Kuwait
1
No. Substance
275320 275310 280325
320360 275320
Temp. limits ("C)
8.751 9.768
98.5
118.8
8.320
9.875
111.5
95.3
10.114
(min-')
(kJ/Mol)
119.4
logA
Peak 1 E
415450 400445 410450
404430 420460
Temp. limits ('C) (min-') 18.525 10.496
(kJ/Mol) 260.2 155.4
(OC)
12.576 9.634 12.366
134.4 171.0
14.790
208.2
172.3
18.020
450480 445490
(min-I)
log A
Peak 3 E
Temp. limits
log A
236.4
(kJ/Mol)
Peak 2 E
Table 4-208: Oxidation kinetics according to ASTM E 698-79. DSC experiments.
450510 470515 465520
510570 460520
('c)
Temp. limits
10.223 9.073
156.4 140.4
7.521
9.686
148.7
116.4
8.492
(min-')
log A
136.4
(kJ/Mol)
Peak 4 E
b
2
R
R
5
5
'a
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs 160
-
140
-
120 100
463
532.11 C
-
RO-
m
3 E
60
-
40
-
20
-
0-
1bo
2bo
All
osg
c
4bO
sbo
KbO
Fig. 4-213 Oxidation in Air of Bitumen B80 STA Diagram: DTA Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air 30 + 20 cm3/min
fuel deposition region is characterized by several peaks, and the fuel combustion region by one peak again. Fig. 4-214 shows the raw data plot of the values representing the last peak. In Fig. 4215 the regression line in the plot of In heating rate versus 1 000/Kelvin is presented. The values of the kinetic parameters are given in Table 4-209, No. 1.
,
0
464
200
-
i30
-
100
-
50
-
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
I)
Y Y
p0
O!!0
3bo
540
BbO
oeg
c
30
7b0
Fig. 4-214 Oxidation in Air of Bitumen B80 STA Raw Data Plot of the Fuel Combustion Peak at Different Heating Rates Atmosphere: Air 30 + 20 cm3/min
7
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
1.0
-
i
Fig. 4-215 Oxidation in Air of Bitumen B80 Fuel Combustion Range STA Diagram: In Heating Rate versus 1000/Kelvin Kinetics according ASTM E 698-79
i
i
465
2a
ASTM E 698-79 ASTM E 698-79 ASTM E 698-79 Flynn f Wall McCarty + Green McCarty + Green
1
300375 310355 304357 240380 285394 285394
Temp. limits ('C)
~~
56.29
56.29
87.183
68383
86.56
74.72
3.927
3.926
7.095
5.293
6.966
5.702
(min-I)
(kJ/Mol)
~~~
log A
~
Peak 1 E
375410 386418 384413 380430 394425 394478
Temp. limits ("C)
147.89
248.90 10,345
18.640
12.929
12.868
168.72 167.92
11.157
10.210
(min-')
logA
153.94
135.53
(kJ/Mol)
Peak 2 E
-
-
232.99
252.32
232.68
237.27
-
450480 42747 1 430480 42547 8
(kJ/Mol)
Peak 3 E
Temp. limits ("C)
Remarks: No. 1: Calculated with STA software using separately collected DTA data No. 2: Externally calculated using DTA data from simultaneous TGA/DTA measurements No. 3: Externally calculated using DTG data from simultaneous TGAiDTA measurements No. 4: Values at the conversion in the DTG peak maximum No. 5: Results of the experiment with /3 = 10 K/min, evaluation of four reaction ranges No. 6: Results of the experiment with p= 10 K/min, evaluation of three reaction ranges
6
5
4
3
2
Method
No.
Table 4-209: Oxidation kinetics of bitumen B80. Experiments with Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer.
-
16.434
17.752
16.226
16.666
-
(min-')
log A
515610 515575 520574 480560 478556 478556
Temp. limits ("C)
166.32
166.32
138.69
129.73
124.80
138.63
(kJ/Mol)
Peak 4 E
10.774
10.744
8.378
7.640
8.324 7.198
(min-')
logA
Y
2
3
b
2
01
s
$.
@a
9g,
s'
$
.a
2
4.I0 Comparison of commercial computer programs
467
4.10.2J.2 Experiments using Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer
Fig. 4-209 gives the curves of TGA and DTA versus temperature for the oxidation experiments of bitumen B80. The TGA curve has at least four points of inflexion representing the different regions of reaction. The DTA curve displays four pronounced peak maxima. Even the DTG curve in Fig. 4-210 displays more than one maximum of the reaction rate against temperature. The maximum temperatures should be adjusted in order to fit the regression line in the plot of In (heating rate) versus 1 000/Kelvin. As mentioned in chapter 3.4.1.2, the kinetic parameters have to be calculated externally using those peak maximum temperatures. The kinetic parameters are presented in Table 4-209, No. 2 and No. 3.
Insufficient nllbCr of points for calculatfoa
-20 1
100
I
20 0
I
300
Deg C
Fig. 4-216 Oxidation in Air of Bitumen B80 STA Diagram: DTA Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air 30 + 20 cm3/min Kinetics according Borchardt and Daniels
4b0
5bO
1
600
468
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
4.10.2.2 Kinetics according to Borchardt and Daniels The remarks made in chapter 4.10.1.2 concerning the evaluation of pyrolysis experiments according to Borchardt and Daniels are likewise true for the oxidation tests. This is demonstrated in figs. 4-216 and 4-217. Evaluation of the first oxidation peak (LTO) of bitumen B80 gives fairly high values of the lunetic parameters, i.e. E = 147.89 kJ/Mole, log A = 12.347 min-’, and quite a reasonable reaction order R = 1.14. In the attempt to evaluate the next peaks separately, the computer fails to give any results, displaying only: “Insufficient Number of Points for Calculation.” The attempt to calculate the combined peaks gives negative values E = -107.03 kJ/Mole, log A = -10.015 min-‘, and t~ = -7.61.
160
-
140
-
120
-
100
-
80
-
u
$ (D
3 E
60
40
all
-
RESULTS
Hlrxnl:
-7.61 32685.15 J/m
0-
-20
-L
b
0
I
100
I
PO0
3bo
m g
Fig. 4-21 7 Oxidation in Air of Bitumen I380 STA Diagram: DTA Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air 30 + 20 cm3/min Kinetics according Borchardt and Daniels
c
400
5b0
6b0
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
469
4.10.2.3 Kinetics according to Flynn and Wall The TGA plot of the oxidation of bitumen B80 clearly displays the different regions of reaction, characterizedby points of inflexion and subsequent alterations of the slope of the curve (figs. 4-209 and 4-210). For evaluation it should be wise to set some of the lines of isoconversion at conversion levels corresponding to those of the DTA and/or DTG maxima (Fig. 4-218). Figs. 4-209 and 4-210 reveal that the DTA (DTG) maxima correspond to conversion levels of 4.2 %, 15.9 %, 46.0 %, and 70.2 %. The plot of In heating rate versus 1 000/K shows a high accuracy of the three test runs (Fig. 4-219). The other plots are similar to those already given for the pyrolysis experiment and also give acceptable results for the oxidation test. Simultaneous plotting of the results from the different conversion
120
i 10 ‘00 90
00
rr C
E
70
0
a
60
-.i SO -.2 40
-.3
30
-.4
20
-.I
20
Fig. 4-218 Oxidation in Air of Bitumen BSO STA Raw Data Plot, Lines of Isoconversion Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air 30 + 20 cm3/min Kinetics according Flynn and Wall
470
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
levels is impossible, since the computer program selects the optimum scale for the ordinate, for a pre-set abscissa scale. For example, if the conversion levels are set at temperatures between 300 "C and 600 "C on the abscissa, the ordinate will be graduated in minutes for conversion levels of 4.2 % and 15.9 %, but in hours for conversion levels of 46.0 % and 70.2 %, so comparison is impossible (Table 4-210). The plot of activation energy versus percent conversion clearly demonstrates an increase of the activation energy as a consequence of rising conversion, displaying two maxima at approximately 10 % and 55 % conversion (Fig. 4-220). This may also be deduced from the Table of kinetic results (Fig. 4-221). The results are more exact if the three regions of reaction are evaluated separately. The program offers the facility to cut the TGA curve at will, for example between 100 % and 94 % weight (LTO range), between 94 % and 79 % weight (fuel deposition l), between 65 % and 40 % weight (fuel deposition 2), and between 40 % and 25 % weight (fuel
3.4
-
1
3.2
-
9.0
-
0
cl
cc
2.8
in
C
*
< -
2.6
c,
2.4
-
n
2.0
-
1.0
-
2.2
1.6 I
1.90
125
1.'30
$.I35
1.'40
1145
l.'LIO
100 0 :'Ke 1 v i n
lfS5
1.60
t
1.65
r
i.?Q
Fig. 4-219 Oxidation in Air of Bitumen B80 STA Diagram: In Heating Rate versus 1000/Kelvin at Different Conversion Levels Kinetics according Flynn and Wall
1 iS
41 1
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
combustion). These four section may be called up and evaluated separately. In each of the regions a set of lines of isoconversion from 10 % up to 90 % relative conversion was Table 4-210: Half life time tl,12of the oxidation of bitumen B80. Kinetics according to Flynn and Wall. Experiments with Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer Conversion (%)
Dimension of of 5 1 2
350°C
400°C
450°C
500°C
4.2 15.9 46.0 70.2
Minutes Minutes Days Days
97.8 12.05 2.35
32.2 1.94
13.3 0.5 1
5.55
-
-
-
-
4.1
0.1
-
-
350
900
i150
a0 0
150
100
50 I
10
I
20
1
30
I
4E
0
Percent c o n v e r i i o n
Fig. 4-220 Oxidation in Air of Bitumen B80 STA Diagram: Activation Energy versus Percent Conversion Kinetics according Flynn and Wall
I
60
I
70
I
3
472
4 Thennoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
KINETIC6 R E 8 U T S Flynn li W.11
OXIDATION
P.P.
BITUMEN B BO..ABSOLUTE PERCENTAGE
-
___
4.2 X t RXN MlDER 1 1 ACTIVATION E M R Q Y I kJ/molm I : 79.11lJm4 PRE-EXPONENTIAL FACTOR Il/nlnl: 1799632
CONVEHSION:
CONVEHSIDN:
10 X
t RXN
DWER
-
1
1
I
ACTIVATION W E A D Y I kJ/nola I : 151 .OSOG PRE-EXPONENTIAL FACTOR IS/m$nl: 2 . W 8 3 0 7 9 E + l i
-
1S.9 I I RXN WOER 1 1 ACTIVATION EWERDY I NJ/m01m j : FACTOR ll/minl:
CONVERSION:
PRE-EXPONENTIAL
CONVEASIOH. 20 I
I HXN OfmER
-
127.7 173 2.980931E+09
1 1
ACTIVATION ENERDY I kJ/nolm I : FWE-EXPOXENTIAL FACTDH II/nlnl
116.4047
: 3.11263IIETOm
30 x c Rm ORL)ER 1 j ACTIVATION E N u l D V t k J h c l a I : PRE-EXPOWENTIAL FACTOR It/mlnl:
L95.0794 1.937039E+14
48 I t RXN OROER 1 1 ACTIVATION ENERDV I kJ/nnla I : P R E - E X P O M N T I A L FACTOR Il/ntnl:
291. m471 S.li14049ET20
commsrm
CONVEASIW
-
UOHVERSION: 63 x t RMI DAlLR 1 1 ACTIVATION ENERDY I kJ/nmla I : a94. sesa PRE-EXPONENTIAL FACTOR ll/nlnl : 4.44090(IE+20
-
CONVEFIaIoN: 7 0 . 2 X L RYN OWER 1 1 ACTIVATION ENEFXW I kJ/molm I : PRE-EXPONENTIAL FACTOR Il/ninl :
Fig. 4-221 Oxidation in Air of Bitumen B80 STA Plot: Table of Kinetic Results Kinetics according Flynn and Wall
selected. The raw data plot of section 3 (fuel deposition 2) between 65 % and 40 % weight (absolute) corresponding to 35 to 65 % conversion from the oxidation of bitumen B80 is shown in Fig. 4-222. The kinetic parameters calculated for the four sections are given in Table 4-209, No. 4. The results of both methods, i.e. evaluation of the total curve and evaluation of sections of the curve are compared in Table 4-21 1. Although there are differences in the values, those obtained by evaluation of the four sections separately are closer to the results of other methods (Table 4-209).
Table 4-211: Oxidation kinetics of bitumen B80 according to Flynn and Wall. Experiments with Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer Conversion
DTG Maximum No. 1 2 3 4
at DTG Maximum
Evaluation of the complete curve E (kJ/Mol)
log A (min-')
79.118 127.717 291.847 207.687
6.255 9.471 20.833 13.471
Separate evaluation of 4 reaction ranges E (kJ/Mol) log A (min-')
(%)
4.2 15.9 46.0 70.2
87.183 167.920 252.319 138.686
7.095 12.929 17.752 8.378
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
413 285
280
275
270 +I -I
0
26a
2
260
r"
L U
253
250
243
240
QO
Fig.4-222 Oxidation in Air of Bitumen B80 STA Raw Data Plot: Fuel Deposition Range 2 Lines of Isoconversion Heating Rates p: 5, 10, 20 K/min Atmosphere: Air 30 + 20 cm3/min Kinetics according Flynn and Wall
4.10.2.4 Kinetics according to McCarty and Green Evaluation according to McCarty and Green also provides for the separate calculation of kinetic parameters for the different regions of reaction. From a rational point of view the integration limits might be selected using the onset (offset) temperatures, which define the parts of the curve having different slopes, as shown in figs. 4-223 and 4-224 for the oxidation test of bitumen B80 at a heating rate p = 10 K/min. At least three or maybe even four regions of reaction are reflected. The first one, from 285 "C up to 394 "C (low temperature oxidation LTO), exhibits quite different behavior of the TGA curve from the first region of the pyrolysis curve (Fig. 4-206). The flattening of the slope of the oxidation
414 110
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
285.11 C
100
4J
90
-
eo
-
70
-
-
onset p o t n t 1 3Iu.7~c * onset paint 2
425.01 C
= onset point 3
C
:
60-
0
a
50 40
30
-
-
555.68
c
10 -
-
onset
20
0-
r
I
100
0
a00
r
300
4b0
sbo
6b0
Fig. 4-223 Oxidation in Air of Bitumen B80 STA Diagram: TGA Heating Rate p: 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air 30 + 20 cm3/min Onset Point and Offset Point Temperatures
Table 4-212: Oxidation kinetics of bitumen B80 according to McCarty and Green. Experiments with Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer, Heating rate p = 10 K/min Temperature limits ("C)
285 (onset 1 ) . . . 394 (onset 2) 394 (onset 2). . . 425 (onset 3) 425 (onset 3). . . 478 (onset 4) 478 (onset 4). . . 556 (onset 5) 394 (onset 2). . . 478 (onset 4) ~
E (!d/Mol)
log A (min-')
56.29 248.90 232.99 166.32 147.89
3.926 18.640 16.434 10.744 10.345
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
60
-
10
-
70
RESULT9
-
1: 0
to onaet 4
232.99 kJ/mole
4030
onaet 3
475
FESULTB
onaet 4
to onaet 5 147.89 kJ/nole
166.32 kJ/mOlm
k
1
100
A0
I
300
Den
c
400
5bO
600
Fig. 4-224 Oxidation in Air of Bitumen B80 STA Diagram: TGA Heating Rate p : 10 K/min Atmosphere: Air 30 + 20 cm3/niin Kinetics according McCarty and Green
curve indicates that non-volatile oxygen-containing reaction products are formed. The kinetic parameters of this region correspond to literature values for LTO (Table 4-212). The next region, from 394 "C up to 478 "C may be divided into two reaction regions from 394 "C up to 425 "C and from 425 "C up to 478 "C.If two regions are assumed to be present, then relatively high values for the kinetic parameters are obtained whilst the calculation for only one region gives E = 147.89 kJ/Mol and log A = 10.345 min-'. These values correspond better to those of the second region of reaction obtained by other methods of evaluation (Table 4-209, No. 2, No. 3, and No. 4). The last region from 478 "C up to 600 "Ccannot be evaluated completely since the curve retrogrades above a temperature of approximately 550 "C.That is because the increase of temperature of the sample pan is faster than the selected heating rate of the instrument, because the sample was too great.
1
476
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Therefore the curve can only be evaluated up to 550 "C giving E = 166.35 kJ/Mol and log A = 10.744min-'. The results from the oxidation reaction depend to a greater or lesser extent on the heating rate. Heating rates of 5 K/min and 10 K/min give nearly identical results. At higher heating rates, e.g. 20 K/min and faster, only one region of reaction only between 412 "C and 490 "C appears whereas the retrogradation above 550 "C disappears (Fig. 4-225). The curve exhibits four onset (offset) points and comes to an end at approximately 600 "C:
110
100
-
90
-
70 Y 60 L t 50 80
0
10
*O 0
I 0
J
1
1bo
200
3bO
I
nap C
Fig. 4-225 Oxidation in Air of Bitumen B80 STA Diagram: TGA Heating Rate p: 20 K/min Atmosphere: Air 30 + 20 cm3/min Kinetics according McCarty and Green
400
sbo
fib0
lC
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
onset (offset) point No. 1 2 3 4
477
Temperature ("C) 307.96 412.53 490.36 557.58
Evaluation of the experiment at fi = 20 K/min heating rate gives slightly different but realistic values of the kinetic parameters, for the three reaction ranges from 308 "C up to 413 OC, from 413 "C up to 490 OC, and from 490 "C up to 550 "C. Calculation for the last part from 558 "C up to 595 "C gives values never observed before for that region of reaction or for the oxidation of elemental carbon: E = 414.95 kJ/Mol and log A = 25.328 min-'. We cannot give a rational explanation for these values and they must be considered to be an artefact (Table 4-213). Table 4-213: Oxidation kinetics of bitumen B80 according to McCarty and Green. Experiments with Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer, Heating rate p = 20 K/min Temperature limits ("C)
308 (onset 1) . . . 413 (onset 2) 413 (onset 2). . . 490 (onset 3) 490 (onset 3). . . 558 (onset 4) 558 (onset 4). . . 595 (onset 5)
E W/Mol)
log A (min-')
66.35 180.30 148.75 414.95
4.886 12.768 9.572 25.328
4.10.3 Conclusions In principle Differential Scanning Calorimetry and Thermogravimetry are suitable methods for investigation of the kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions of heavy crude oils and heavy petroleum products. The repeatability of selected values i.e. onset and offset point temperatures, and DSC (DTA) and DTG peak maximum temperatures, is excellent. For the pyrolysis reaction the coefficient of variation is k 2 % maximum. In the oxidation reaction this is also true for the regions of low temperature oxidation and of fuel combustion. For the fuel deposition region of reaction the repeatability is worse. The kinetics of the pyrolysis reaction may be investigated using a DSC instrument or a thermobalance which give nearly identical results. In the DSC investigation using the ASTM E 698-79 method, there is the disadvantage that the conversion level at the temperature of the maximum of energy flow is not known. This maximum should also represent the maximum conversion rate. Calculations using the values of total conversion after termination of the experiment give values of the kinetic parameters which are somewhat too high. The investigation is time consuming since at least three test runs with heating rates of 5 K/min, 10 K/niin, and 20 K/min from room temperature up to 550 to
478
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
600 "C have to be performed. This takes more than 200 minutes heating times, neglecting the cooling times. In practice only one investigation of kinetic parameters can be performed per day. The same is true for the thermogravimetnc investigation according to Flynn and Wall because at least three test runs are necessary. From the point of view of test time, the methods of Borchardt and Daniels, and of McCarty and Green are preferred since both methods require the data of only one test run. The Borchardt and Daniels method proved not to be applicable to the reactions and substances under investigation. On the other hand the McCarty and Green method requires an extensive knowledge of the reactions of the investigation. Regrettably the software for this method is only offered by one supplier of thermoanalytical equipment. No software is available for processing DTG peak maximum temperatures according to ASTM E 698-79. Even the Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer used in this investigation does not possess software for processing the DTA data collected in simultaneous TGA/DTA experiments. Separately sampled DTA data only, may be used for the calculation. Sampling of DTA data alone does not provide knowledge of the conversion level at the peak maximum of the energy flow, so there is no control as to whether the peak maxima of energy flow of the three test runs correspond to identical conversion levels, and this is the condition for the application of the ASTM E 698-79 method. In this study we have shown that there were practically equal conversion levels at the DTA and DTG maxima respectively independent of the heating rates. Evaluation according to ASTM E 698-79 could be performed using a cheaper instrument than a simultaneous thermal analyzer, whose capacities would not be fully utilized by this method of evaluation. Moreover the sensitivity of a single DSC device is mostly higher than that of a combined TGA/DSC or TGA/DTA system. These considerations are also valid for the investigation of oxidation reactions according to ASTM E 698-79. Evaluation according to ASTM E 698-79 can be subject to considerable errors. This is based on the fact that the slope of the regression line in the log heating rate fiversus 1 000/Kelvin diagram is E/R. The activation energy E is obtained by multiplication with the universal gas constant R,a factor of 8.314. This implies that small deviations of the slope of this regression line may cause large divergences of activation energy and frequences factor. Therefore it is recommended that one or two test runs should be repeated, rather than using experimental data which do not fit the regression line closely. The same holds for the evaluation of data of equal conversion obtained using a thermobalance according to Flynn and Wall. In that case the temperatures, i.e. the inverse Kelvin temperatures of the points of isoconversion, have to fit the regression line in the plot of log (heating rate) versus 1 000/T as closely as possible. Most information is obtained from the evaluation according to Flynn and Wall. The shape of the TGA curve supplies a preliminary qualitative assessment of the thermal behavior of the sample. It may easily be recognized if the curve represents one reaction or several consecutive reactions. The synchronous plot of the DTA signal confirms this. The additional plot of the DTG curve allows one to check whether the maxima of the reaction heat flow of different experiments correspond to an equal conversion level. The Flynn and
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
479
Wall evaluation program allows the lines of isoconversion to be set at points of special interest in the TGA curves, such as the points of conversion corresponding to the DTA or DTG maximum peak maximum temperatures. One advantage of the Flynn and Wall method consists in the display of the function of activation energy versus the conversion, and in the numerical display of the same function in the Table of kinetic results. This permits control and comparison with the results of external calculations according to ASTM E 698-79 using DTG and DTA maximum temperatures. This comparison of the respective values received from DTG maximum temperatures according to ASTM E 698-79 and according to Flynn and Wall for corresponding conversion levels is shown in Table 4-214. All the values are within fairly close limits. The differences of corresponding values range from 2.4 % (asphaltenes) to 13.9 % (VR Kuwait). The origin of those differences has been discussed above. Tabel 4-214: Comparison of Activation Energy (kJ/Mol) Pyrolysis Reaction Sample No.
Sample
1 2 3
Bitumen B80 VR Kuwait Dispersion Medium from No. 2 Petroleum Resins from No. 2 Asphaltenes from No. 2
4
5
ASTM E 698-79 Externally from DTG maximum temperatures
Flynn and Wall Corresponding to DTG maximum temperatures
193.5 209.4
202.8 180.3
190.5
198.2
206.8
230.8
224.1
218.8
Evaluation according to McCarty and Green offers some of the advantages of the Flynn and Wall method, but presupposes extensive knowledge of the physical and chemical alterations caused by rising temperatures, so that the integration limits can be correctly selected. For example, in the pyrolysis reaction, pyrolysis can be distinguished from evaporation. The selection of temperature limits is facilitated by using the onset temperatures. Integration using 250 "C as lower limit and the temperature of the first onset point as upper limit gives kinetic parameters of an evaporation process, whereas integration using the first and last onset point temperatures as limits provides the kinetic parameters of the pyrolysis reaction. The heating rate p = 10 k/min commonly applied in most laboratories delivers reasonable results, comparable to the results of the other methods. A step-wise integration of the curve helps to construct the dependence of the kinetic parameters upon the conversion. For reactions which run too fast, or at a selection of limits too close together, the computer fails to work since an insufficent number of data points will be available. The oxidation reaction appears to be more complicated than pyrolysis because there are always at least three or four regions of reaction. The peak maximum temperatures of the
480
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
DSC, DTA, and DTG of the first region, the low temperature oxidation, and of the last region, the fuel combustion, may be repeated with nearly the same precision as the peak maximum temperatures of pyrolysis. The intermediate region, the fuel deposition, however, show a poor repeatability of the peak maxima. In this region usually more than one peak appears of variable shape, so it is not easy to assign the corresponding peaks of the test runs at different heating rates. This unfortunately has to be done by trial and error to achieve the best fitting regression line. This is clearly due to the nature of the sample and the nature of the reaction, rather than to instrumentalfailure. Therefore the kinetic values in this region of reaction are suspect. They can display trends but never absolute values. This is valid for all the methods of evaluation using peak maximum temperatures or peak areas, i.e. ASTM E 698-79 and Borchardt and Daniels. In the other methods using the TGA curves for evaluation i.e. Flynn and Wall, McCarty and Green, evaluation of the region of fuel deposition is not so precise because the points of inflexion of the TGA curves, which have to be used for setting the lines of isoconversion or for integration limits, are not clearly defined in the curves achieved at the different heating rates. The results depend on interpretation by the analyst. Three or four evaluable peaks in the analysis of bitumen B80 and the vacuum residue Kirkuk can be found using the DSC instrument. The low temperature oxidation region is represented by one peak. Two peaks appear in the region of fuel deposition and one peak in the region of fuel combustion. All the colloid components of the vacuum residue Kirkuk show only one evaluable peak in the fuel deposition region. The same is true using the Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer while processing DTA data sampled separately. If the peak maximum temperatures from simultaneous TGA/DTA experiments were applied for the calculation according to ASTM E 698-79, then a slulled analyst may evaluate four peaks. The results of different methods are fairly similar. The differences of the peak maximum temperatures of DTA and DTG for each run are so small, that normally, identical values are found for the kinetic parameters. Here again any differences are a question of close fitting of the regression lines. Regarding the oxidation experiments, evaluation according to Flynn and Wall provides most information. The TGA curve first shows how many regions of reaction are present. The DTA curve supplies the temperatures of the peak maxima of energetic processes and the DTG curve displays the maxima of the reaction rate. Knowledge of the conversion level at the DTA and DTG maxima permits calculation of the kinetic parameters for those conversion levels. This may be performed by the Flynn and Wall method by setting the lines of isoconversion on the corresponding points of the TGA curves or by external calculation according to ASTM E 698-79, processing the temperature data of DTA orland DTG peak maxima. Moreover the knowledge of the dependence of the kinetic parameters upon the conversion level is very valuable. Two alternative methods of calculation are used to evaluate a multi-step process: either evaluation of the complete TGA curve, or evaluation of three or four sections of the curve separately. The results indicate the wisdom of evaluating the sections separately; this takes more time but the results are closer to those of the other methods. The results from the different methods of calculation of the kinetic parameters of the
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
48 1
oxidation experiments are compared in Table 4-209. The differences between the values obtained by different methods are larger for oxidation than for pyrolysis. Each of the computer evaluation programs offers a series of graphs of the results. Besides a General Data Plot the following functions may be plotted:
1. Raw Data Plot 2. In or log (Heating Rate) versus 1000/T 3. Arrhenius Plot: In k versus 1 000/T 4. Specific Rate Constant k versus Temperature ("C) 5. Half Life t1,2versus Temperature ("C) 6. Isothermal: Percent conversion versus Time 7. Isoconversion: Time versus Temperature ("C) 8. Table of Results The Flynn and Wall programm displays additional plots: 9. Activation Energy versus Percent Conversion 10. Estimated Lifetime versus Temperature The Raw Data Plot of the ASTM E 698-79 method shows whether the correct maximum temperatures have been obtained by selection of the limits. For the Flynn and Wall method there is a control whether the desired points of inflexion of the TGA curves are marked correctly. In the McCarty and Green program a Raw Data plot has no significance. The plot In or log (heating rate) versus 1 000/Trepresents a useful control as to whether the regression line fits closely enough to the data points or an additional test run is necessary. This comprises the evaluation according to ASTM E 698-79 as well as to Flynn and Wall. The Arrhenius Plot and the Plot of Specific Rate Constant k versus Temperature are of limited practical use. The same holds for the plots No. 4 to No. 7. They all use linear scales for the coordinates, which restricts the possibility of extrapolation. Moreover the temperature is given in degrees Celsius instead of 1 000/Kelvin. As a consequence plots No. 4,5, and 7 are displayed as parabolas. The ranges become very small due to the linear abscissa, so that only a very small range of temperature may be plotted in graphs No. 5 and No. 7. Moreover the extrapolation of parabolas is worse than an extrapolation of lines. A much better opportunity for extrapolation is offered by a graph consisting of a linearly scaled ordinate and a logarithmic abscissa. For example Fig. 4-226 demonstrates the graph of log half-life time versus 1000/Kelvin. This kind of display converts the parabola into a straight line, which may be very easily extrapolated. Moreover the logarithmic time axis covers several orders of magnitude, and a change of dimensions, e.g. from minutes to days becomes superfluous. Several processes of one substance or one process of several substances may be compared easily in only one plot. The plot of Isothermal: Percent Conversion versus Time is of high practical interest. This function allows the dependence of the conversion upon the time to be found quickly for any pre-selected temperature. A change of the scale of the two axes would render the parabolas as straight lines.
482
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
Fig. 4-226 Oxidation in Air of Bitumen B80 Half Life Time t1,2 versus Temperature
The same is true for the plot of Isoconversion: Time versus Temperature, here the time to temperature function for any pre-selected conversion level is displayed. The plot of Activation Energy versus Percent Conversion and the Table of Kinetic Results in the evaluation according to Flynn and Wall are useful. The Table of Results contains the numerical values of the activation energies and the frequency (preexponential) factors as function of the pre-selected conversion levels, which can be applied directly for kinetic calculations. The application of thermoanalytical methods to the investigation of the kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation processes of heavy petroleum components representing multicomponent systems proved to be successful. Whereas the ASTM E 698-79 and the Flynn and Wall methods can be applied relatively uncritically, the interpretation of the data from the McCarty and Green method requires a solid knowledge of the thermal and oxidative behavior of the samples. The attempt to use the evaluation according to Borchardt and Daniels proved not to be successful for pyrolysis nor for oxidation reactions. Most of the
4.10 Comparison of commercial computer programs
483
suppliers recommend this method only for reactions without large changes in sample weight, e.g. curing of epoxides or cross-linking reactions in general. The results of the other three methods differ slightly from each other, but are all in the same order of magnitude. It is doubtful whether such different methods can give identical results in the investigation of multi-component systems, nevertheless the experiments may be repeated within acceptable tolerances. In most technical applications only comparable values are required. They may be obtained by using one or other of the methods of investigation, but it is advisable to compare only values obtained by the same method. DSC instruments can be used as well as thermobalances. The use of a Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer (TGA/DSC or TGS/DTA) makes sense only if the software permits evaluation of the DSC (DTA) data using the ASTM E 698-79 method, and evaluation of thermogravimetric data by the Flynn and Wall method. Otherwise using a cheaper instrument will be just as good. Thermoanalytical methods for investigation of reaction kinetics should only be applied to samples with high atmospheric initial boiling points. Samples possessing boiling ranges below 300 "C will evaporate completely due to the gas flow through the instrument, even in the oxidation test. Such substances can only be measured in pressured systems, such as pressure TGA or pressure DSC. The application of the Flynn and Wall method to samples with initial boiling points a little above 300 "C is possible, but interpretation of the results is sometimes difficult because there is a coincidence of two different types of reaction i.e. endothermal evaporation and endothermal pyrolysis or endothermal evaporation and exothermal oxidation. The application of pressure can be helpful, especially in the oxidation test. For example, it has been found in test runs on bitumen B80 that the peak temperature of the pyrolysis reaction increases from 450 "C at 1 bar pressure up to 455 "C at 10 bar pressure whereas the peak temperature of the LTO decreases from 3 19 "C (1 bar) down to 282 "C (10 bar). Boiling temperatures in the range around 300 "C will be increased by about 10-25 "C if the pressure is increased from 1 bar to 10 bar. Since no high pressure thermobalance was at the author's disposal, the experiments at higher pressures were carried out using the pressure DSC. Generally, the best results will be obtained in the investigation of very high or non-boiling substances, such as residues from vacuum distillation, cracker residues, kerogens from oil shale, etc. In those cases the application of thermoanalytical methods seems to be the method of best choice. Evaluation according to ASTM E 698-79 of DSC experiments with the help of the DuPont software, supplies the values of pyrolysis or oxidation enthalpy (J/g) too, resulting from integration of the peak areas. As described in chapter 3.3.2 these energetic values are not independent of the heating rates, even for model substances and may not be compared with literature data. Moreover, in oxidation any citation of J/g may be significant for the first oxidation peak (LTO) only. For the next peaks, the residual quantity of substance reacting there is never known. The kinetic parameters for different conversion levels calculated according to ASTM E 698-79 using DuPont software may differ somewhat from those obtained using the
484
4 Thermoanalytical Investigations on Petroleum and Peti-oleum Products
Flynn and Wall method. The evaluation according to Flynn and Wall applies measured conversion levels whereas the Ozawa correction of the ASTM E 698-79 incorporated in the DuPont software is based on an empirical function of the dependence of activation energy upon conversion level.
Thermal Methods in Petroleum Analysis by. Heinz Kopsch CopyrightoVCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 1995
5 Final considerations 5.1 Other applications The investigations on petroleum and its products described in chapter 4 demonstrate the suitability of thermal methods such as thermogravimetry, differential thermoanalysis, and differential scanning calorimetry for analysis of the thermal and oxidative behavior of these substances but also demonstrate the limitations of the methods. Besides characterization of multi-component systems, which is not possible by other methods, interpretation of the results permits critical examination of the applicability of these substances for partcualar processes. Vice versa, processes and process parameters can be selected for the substances in question. A monograph can only cover certain aspects of the science it deals with, and this author has set great value on reporting his own experiences. These thermoanalytical procedures may be transferred to other sectors of petroleum technology, which are connected with thermal strains or which generally use thermal processes. For example, the investigation of drilling fluids is of rising interest since the increasing depth of boreholes demands increasing thermal stability of those fluids. Thermal and hydrolytic stability of surfactants and polymers destined for enhanced oil recovery come into the same arena. DSC tests have shown, for example, that the thermal stability (pyrolysis stability) of ethersulphonates containing three to six ethyleneoxide groups in the molecule, is better than ethoxylated i-octylphenols or ethoxylated monophenylglycols. The thermal and hydrolytic stability of organic sulphur compounds has also been investigated. This investigation contributed to knowledge of the cause of the formation of hydrogen sulphide during the steam flooding of reservoirs of heavy crudes. In the development of lubricant additives, the thermal and oxidative stability of single substances can be tested as well as the possible synergism of blends, in combination with different classes of base oils. This is a classic case for the investigation of oxidation kinetics, with the possibility of extrapolating the half life time which was found, towards higher or lower temperatures. Low temperature DSC may be used for precise measurement of the pour point of lubricants and crude oils, and for the selection of a suitable pour point depressant. It may even be help the development of such pour point depressants. The concentration of crystallizing paraffins and possibly aromatics may also be determined by low temperature DSC. Both the chemical nature and the concentration of polymeric modifiers in polymermodified bitumens can be determined by DSC. The aging behavior of bitumen and polymer-modified bitumen in road asphalt or of bitumen extracted from road asphalt, may be analyzed and characterized by thermoanalytical methods. Thermogravimetry in inert gas has shown, for example, that the concentration of evaporable components decreases as a consequence of aging whereas the coke residue (residue at 600°C or 800°C oven temperature) increases, and that is connected with an increase in the concentration of asphaltenes.
486
5 Final considerations
Interesting research into the further processing of distillation residues uses thermoanalytical methods. Thermal cracking may be simulated either in inert gas or in a hydrocarbon atmosphere. The efficiency of catalysts in catalytic cracking, and of hydrocracking in a hydrogen atmosphere at different pressures may be investigated by both TGA and DSC. The dependence of the kinetics on temperature and pressure and on the activity of catalysts may be analyzed and the results transferred to process parameters in the refinery. An investigation on the residues of such processes using thermogravimetry showed that coke residues increase (R600 or R800) with increasing crack seventy. As expected the quantity of crackable residue, CR, and the weight loss rate DTG, which represents the reaction rate, decrease with increasing crack severity. This is an indication that easily crackable components have already been converted. The sludges in lubrication oils and the deposits in diesel, gasoline, and jet engines may be characterized and classified using thermoanalytical methods [5-21. The reduction of the oxidative stability of engine oils may be well quantified using DSC in air, indicating the necessary oil change intervals [5-3, 5-41. Thermogravimetry and DSC have the widest field of application of thermoanalytical methods in investigations on petroleum and its products. Sometimes other methods of thermoanalysis are preferred. Thus the low temperature viscoelastic behavior of bitumen and polymer-modified bitumen may be characterized quite completely using a Dynamic Mechanical Thermal Analyzer (DMTA). This behavior cannot be measured directly by other analytical methods [5-11. Measurements over a large range of frequencies and the generation of a master curve from those data, make the extrapolation to both extremly high and extremly low frequencies feasible, and the resting and rolling of traffic can be simulated. This method has shown that the temperature of second order transition (glass transition) clearly depends upon the frequency. Thermomechanical Analysis, TMA may be used to measure the change of volume of bitumen, so scratching and crack propagation at low temperatures may be simulated, for example for asphalt paving material. The selection of both a suitable instrument and a suitable method for measuring depends upon the problem. If changes of weight in relation to the temperature are predominantly of interest, and energetic effects have rarely to be investigated, then a thermobalance is the optimum choice. Occasionally required energetic measurments should be obtained from a commercial laboratory. A Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer (TGA/DTA or preferably TGA/DSC) is very useful if measurements of weight changes and of energetic effects have frequently to be performed. It is desirable that the instrument can operate from low temperatures of approximately -80 "C up to 800 "C with the same sample. For investigation of the kinetics of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions a Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer is preferred, provided that the incorporated software permits the evaluation according both to ASTME689-79 and Flynn and Wall. In this way the kinetic parameters can be obtained and at the same time the peak maxima (minima) of the curves of energy against temperature can be examined to decide whether they really appear at equal conversion levels independent of the heating rates. All the requirements for the thermoanalysis of petroleum and its products would be fulfilled if such an instrument could
5.2 Summary on progress of instrumentation (hard and software) and advice
487
operate in a range of pressures from lo-*up to 250 or 300 bar. Thermobalances complying with such requirements are only available (with some restrictions) from two suppliers (see chapter 6). Otherwise the purchase of a Pressure DSC and a Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer represents a fair compromise.
5.2 Summary on progress of instrumentation (hard and software) and advice Progress of the instrumentationhas recently taken a rapid turn. In the sixties the standard was that thermobalances and differential thermoanalysis instruments were controlled by electro-mechanical devices and their signals recorded by multipen recorders. In the following years the instrumentations for Differential Scanning Calorimetry (Heat Flux DSC) and Simultanous Thermal Analyzers (STA) comprising thermogravimetry and differential thermal analysis became commercial, but were still equipped with electromechanical controls and multipen recorders. The first power compensation DSC was launched by Perkin-Elmer in 1963 [5-51. Further progress dates to the end of the seventies. At that time data logging and processing, and computerized control of the instrumentationbecame even more customary. Analysis of the evolved crack gases or oxidation products from a STA by mass spectrometry is described relatively early [5-4,5-61. The joint operation of a thermobalance together with a Fourier Transformation Infrared Spectrometer (TG-FTIR) was established to provide identification or at least characterizationof crack gases or oxidation products [5-21. The coupling of a gas chromatograph to a thermobalance was tried even earlier [5-71 for the analysis of polymers. Knowledge of the chemical nature of crack gases evolved from pyrolysis, and the distribution of crack and oxidation products evolved from experiments in air is certainly of interest, but the experimental difficulties must not be underestimated. The complete flow of both evolved and carrier gas cannot pass through a mass spectrometer, gas chromatograph, or FTIR spectrometer, but only a defined partial stream. The transfer pipe from the thermoanalytical instrument, the gas-flow splitting device, and the inlet to the analytical instrument, all have to be heated up to relatively high temperatures (approximately 200 "C). An alternative is the condensation of high boiling components before the gas stream splitting device by using a cooling trap. Some condensation of heavy products may not even be avoided by using heated ducts. On this account it seems impossible to make a quantitative analysis, but adequate evaluations may be made. There are as yet so few publications that an opinion can hardly expressed as to whether this relatively expensive, experimentally difficult, and irritable technique is able to supply enough information, especially in the petroleum analysis, to satisfy the costs. Relatively early on the dependence of pyrolysis and oxidation reactions upon the pressure was investigated by thermogravimetry using devices constructed by the experi-
488
5 Final considerations
mentors themselves [5-81. Thermobalances operating at pressures up to 100 bar became commercial at the beginning of the eighties. A pressure DSC cell for pressures up to 70 bar was available earlier [5-91. This type of instrument is suitable for investigation on the dependence of any reactions upon pressure, such as reaction kinetics, and for measurements on substances possessing relative low atmospheric boiling temperatures. Thermobalances are available in two different designs, i. e. a horizontal construction (Fig. 5-1) and vertical construction. For the vertical construction there are two different versions: the top-loading balance, which has the oven above the balance (Fig. 5-2), and the thermobalance with the sample tray hanging on a thin hangdown wire into the oven below the balance (Fig. 2-4). The suppliers claim some advantages for the horizontal arrangement such as complete lack of buoyancy, the avoidance of condensation in the balance cabinet, and the reduction of sensitivity to vibration. However the last two points cannot be confirmed by the author’s experience. Despite an efficacious gas flow, a diffusion of condensates was observed opposite to the flow direction of the gas. The sensitivity to vibrations seems to be comparable with the vertical design. Of the vertically constructed balances, the top loader is more convenient to manipulate. Some suppliers recommend thermobalances in a vertical design which are equipped with two separate ovens operating with identical heating and gas flow rates for sample and counterweight. This construction completely compensates any buoyancy effects and guarantees a very high resolution of approximate 0.1 pg (Fig. 5-3).
ELECTROMAGNETIC
I
rAMPLIFIER
Fig. 5-1 Horizontal Thermobalance Schematic Diagram of TGA 95 1 (DuPont Instruments, Thermal Analyzers, Leaflet H-16776)
pig.
furnace
-
t
uurae aas /
5-2 Vertical Thermobalance with Oven in Top Position Schematic Diagram of the Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer STA 409EP (Netzsch Geratebau GmbH)
balance system
inductive displacement transducer
purge gas thermostat
radiation shield protective tube
sample carrier
metallic heater
Schematic Diagram STA 409 EP /
TG sample cai'rier
TG sample catmer
TG sample carrier
/
\
,
00
P W
490
5 Final considerations
4 purge gas
Thermo-Microbalance TG 439 Principle of the symmetrical weighing system with connections for protective gas, purge gas and vacuum pump 1) thermostat 2) radiation shield 3)water cooling 4) crucible 5) furnace 6)manometer 7) flow meter 8) balance 9) vacuum pump 10) piping
-D$ magnetic valve control valve
Fig. 5-3 Thermobalance with Symmetrical Weighing System and Two Ovens Schematic Diagram of the Thermal-Microbalance TG 439 (Netzsch Geratebau GmbH)
5.2 Summary on progress of instrumentation (hard and software) and advice
491
High P r e s s u r e Thermogravimetry
Fig. 5-4 Magnetic Suspension Thermobalance with High Pressure Oven (Schematic Diagram: RUBOTHEXM Prazisionsmesstechnik GmbH)
A long-established technique has recently been re-introduced i. e. the principle of magnetic-suspension balances. In this the balance cabinet and the oven chamber are completely separated since the sample hangdown is connected to the balance by a magnetic-suspension coupling. A construction equipped with a housing made from quartz glass is suitable for measurements in aggressive gases up to 900°C sample temperature. An instrument made of a chrome-nickel superalloy may be used for pressures up to 450 bar and for temperatures up to 1 000 "C (Fig. 5-4). Heat flow DSC instruments are generally equipped with a thermoelectric (constantan) disc as platform for both sample and reference pan with two thermocouples situated
492
5 Final considerations
underneath the disc. Both sample and reference pan are situated directly above the thermocouples (Fig. 2-9). In opposition to this arrangement heat flow detectors introduced by Tian and Calvet [5-101 are applied in a series of instruments designed by SETARAM. This type of detector consists of a thermopile each, for sample and reference on the inside. The thermopiles possess high thermal conductivity combined with high caloric sensitivity. In the disc DSC arrangement the caloric sensitivity decreases with increasing temperatures, whereas the caloric sensitivity of the Tian-Calvet system increases. The disc design can only be calibrated by suitable calibration substances whereas the Tian-Calvet system may be calibrated with defined amounts of electrical energy (Joule heat), too. High Resolution Thermogravimetry (HI-RES-TGA) has been developedjust recently in the late eighties. The principle is based on the adaption of the heating rate to the weight loss rate. For example any weight loss will be measured isothermally until the weight loss ceases. Then heating will resume at the pre-set original heating rate until the next weight loss starts. Applying this mode one will obtain a resolution owing to extremly low linear heating rates even at normally high heating rates for example 10 K/min. Weak effects, which will be “over-taken“ at higher heating rates, may be detected in this manner. Experimental time will be saved, but this principle cannot be applied for measurements on reaction kinetics. The latest development (1992) is the Modulated Differential Scanning Calorimetry (MDSC). Here the linear heating rate is superimposed by a sinoidal modulation. The following advantages of this mode are claimed: direct measurement of heat capacity improved resolution of adjacent or superimposed effects improved sensitivity for weak transition effects separation of reversible from irreversible effects Most suppliers now offer automatic sample loading and unloading devices, which are of special interest for time consuming investigations such as reaction kinetics requiring several measurements for each substance, and for quality control laboratiories, which have to handle a multitude of samples. The provision of software concerning instrument control, data logging, and data processing differs less in volume than in quality from the various suppliers. The possibility of multi-tasking and the option of multimodule operation is standard with regard to the efficiency of modern computers. But in data logging the first differences in the software are found from some suppliers concerning the sampling rates. Evaluation of rapid processes or of processes, which take place within narrow temperature limits (such as oxidation processes) require high sampling rates. The recalling of the stored data for evaluation is ‘me-consumingbecause of the large quantity of data. Therefore the computer should be ipped with a fast processor. On the other hand medium or slow sampling rates suffice for some applications, for example to decide whether two samples are identical within defined limits. Computer programs containing variable sampling rates are resonably priced.
5.2 Summary on progress of instrumentation (hard and software) and advice
493
There are some computer programs, which are practically fool proof. In them erroneous commands can be revoked, the computer indicates if a sufficient number of data is not stored for an elected operation, intermediate results may be stored and recalled, and obviously wrong results may be eliminated. In other programs such possibilities are lacking. In the case of an erroneous command the evaluation must be called off and restarted or the software “crashes” displaying something like “hit any key to return to system”. This will also happen if the program perceives after prolonged attempts at calculation, that the number of stored data does not suffice or that an illegal command has been suggested. In that case the complete evaluation program has to be re-started from the very beginning including the time-consuming recalling of the stored data. To avoid unpleasant surprises it may be advisable to test the instrumentation and the software in the application laboratory of the supplier, investigating your own substances prior to the purchase of any instrumentation. Since there are no error-free programs the supplier should provide adequate “software support” and regularly update with improvements or corrections. The manuals for both hardware and software sometimes cause surprise. There are some excellent as well as some imperfect publications. When buying an instrument worth many thousands of dollars (marks, yen), it does not seem unreasonable to request the delivery of manuals in one’s own language. One should not presume that the laboratory and maintenance staff who have to operate and maintain the instrumentation are fluent in foreign technical languages.
Thermal Methods in Petroleum Analysis by. Heinz Kopsch CopyrightoVCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 1995
6 Appendix: Manufacturers of thermoanalytical instrumentation Company
Representative
Bihr Geratebau GmbH Altendorfer Weg 12 D-32606 Hullhorst Germany DMT-Gesellschaft fur Forschung und Priifung mbH Franz-Fischer-Weg 6 1 D-45307 Essen Germany
GAB0 QUALIMETER Testanlagen GmbH SchulstraBe 6 D-29693 Ahlden Germany GLOBIOS-MOM Csorsz u. 35 H-1124 Budapest XI1 Hl-lngarY Gonotec GmbH Eisenacher StraBe 56 D-10823 Berlin Germany HARROP INDUSTRIES, Inc. Laboratory Instruments Group 3470 East Fifth Avenue Columbus, OH 43219-1797 USA HIDEN ANALYTICAL. Ltd. 231 Europa Boulevard Gemini Business Park Warrington WA5 5TN UK LECO CORPORATION 300 Lakeview Avenue St. Josephs, MI 49058-2396 USA Linseis GmbH Vielitzer StraBe 43 D-95100 Selb/Bayern Germany
VACUA GmbH Niedmannsweg D-8243 1 Ried/Kochel Germany LECO Instruments GmbH BenzstraRe 5B D-85551 Kirchheim bei Miinchen Germany Linseis Inc. 20 Washington Road Princeton-Jct., NJ 08550 USA
496
6 Appendix: Manufacturers of thermoanalytical instrumentation
Company
Representative
Mettler-Toledo AG CH-8606 Greifensee Switzerland
Mettler-Toledo GmbH Ockerweg 3 D-35396 Giessen Germany NETZSCH Inc. 119 Pickenng Way Exton, PA 19341-1393 USA Bodenseewerk Perkin-Elmer D-88647 Uberlingen Germany
NETZSCH-Geratebau GmbH Wittelsbacher StraBe 42 D-95100 Selb/Bayern Germany PERKIN-ELMER Corporation 761 Main Avenue Norwalk, CT 06859-0012 USA Rheometric Scientific Surrey Bussiness Park Weston Road, Kiln Lane Epsom, Surrey KT17 1JF UK
RUBOTHERM Pr2zisionsmesstechnik GmbH UniversifatsstraBe 142 D-44799 Bochum Germany SEIKO Instruments Inc. 6-31-1 Kameido, Koto-ku Tokyo, 136 Japan SETARAM S.A. 7, rue de l'oratoire F-69641 Caluire-Cedex France
Shimadzu Corp. 3. Kanda-Nishikicho 1-chome, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 101 Japan
Rheometric Scientific Polymer Laboratories GmbH Schwanheimer Stral3e 144A D-64625 Bensheim Germany Rheometric Scientific One Possumtown Road Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
C3-Analy sentechnik Fuchsweg 50 D-85598 Baldham Germany SETARAM S.A. Wilhelm-Busch-Weg 1 D- 63303 Dreieich Germany Hainbuchenweg 6 D-09633 TuttendoNFreiberg Germany Shimadzu Europa GmbH Albert-Hahn-StraBe 6-10 D-47269 Duisburg Germany
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. 7102 Riverwood Drive Columbia, MD 21046 USA
6 Appendix: Manufacturers of thennoanalytical instrumentation
Company
Representative
Solomat Instrumentation Glenbrook Industrial Park Stamford, CT 06906 USA
GAB0 QUALIMETER Testanlagen GmbH SchulstraBe 20 D-29693 Ahlden Germany
SWO Polymertechnik GmbH Dahler Allee 31 D-47803 Krefeld Germany TA Instruments Inc. 109 Lukens Drive New Castle, DE 19720 USA THETA INDUSTRIES, Inc. 26 Valley Road Port Washington, NY 11050 USA ULVAC SINKU-RIKO, Inc. 1-9-19 Hakusan, Midori-ku Yokohama 226 Japan
TA Instruments GmbH Thermische Analyse und Rheologie SiemensstraRe 1 D-63755 Alzenau Germany CLUSENER GmbH & Co. KG Sudermann StraBe IA D-32312 Lubbecke Germany Cryophysics GmbH LandwehrstraBe 48 D-64293 Darmstadt Germany
Abbreviations: DSC Differential Scanning Calorimeter DTA Differential Thermal Analyzer TGA Thermogravimetric Analyzer (Thennobalance) Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer (TGA/DSC or TGA/DTA) STA DMTA Dynamic Mechanical Thermal Analyzer TMA Thennomechanical Analyzer DETA Dielectric Thermal Analyzer
497
X X X
X X X
X
X X
X X X
TA Instruments Inc. SWO Polymertechnik GmbH
THETA INDUSTRIES Inc. ULVAC SINKU-RIKO, Inc.
X
X
X
X
X
X X X X X X
X
X
X
TGA
SEIKO Instruments Inc. SETARAM S.A. SHIMADZU Corp. Solomat Instrumentation
X X
X
X X X
X
DTA
X X X X X
X
X
DSC
LINSEIS GmbH Mettler-Toledo NETZSCH-Geratebau GmbH PERKIN-ELMER Corporation Rheometric Scientific Rubotherm Prazisionsmesstechnik
Biihr Geratebau GmbH DMT GAB0 Qualimeter GLOBIOS MOM GONOTEC HARROP INDUSTRIES, Inc. HIDEN ANALYTICAL Inc. LECO CORPORATION
Company
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X X X X X
X
X
X
STA DMTA TMA (DSC) (DTA)
X
X
P
%
-. TSC/RMA Spectrometer Thermally Stimulated Current Depolarization/ Relaxation Map Analysis Pressure DSC, max. 70 bar Hardware by Shimadzu Software by SWO
s
3 3 g.
3
2
5
82 g
2
%
a
2
$
5
3
R
m
W
High pressure magnetic-suspension TGA, max 450 bar
Pressure DSC. max. 70 bar Magnetic-suspension TGA
Pressure TGA, max 20 bar Automated system with sample carouse1
DETA Remarks
Thermal Methods in Petroleum Analysis by. Heinz Kopsch CopyrightoVCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 1995
References References Chapter 1
[I-II 11-21
(1-31 [ 1-41
[I-51 [1-61 11-71 [I-81
[W [I-101 [I-111 []-I21 [1-13] [l-141 [l-151 [l-161 [1-171 [I-181 [1-191 [ 1-20]
[1-21] [ 1-22] [ 1-23] [ 1-24] [ 1-25]
Wesolowski, M.: Thermal Analysis of Petroleum Products. Thermochimica Acta 46 (1981), 21-45. Kettrup, A., Ohrbach, K.-H.: Literaturiibersicht zur Anwendung thermoanalytischer Verf'ak ren fur Mineral01 und verwandte Produkte. DGMK-Projekt 289-06, Hamburg 1986. Mackenzie, R. C.: Differential Thermal Analysis Vol.I & II Academic Press, London 1970. Wiedemann, H. G.: Thermal Analysis. Proceedings of the third International Conference on Thermal Analysis. Davos (Schweiz) 23.-28. Aug. 1971. Birkhhser Verlag, Base1 u. Stuttgart 1972. Wendlandt, W. W.: Thermal Methods of Analysis in: Chemical Analysis, Vol. 19. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1974. Wendlandt, W. W.: Thermoanalytical Techniques in: Handbook of Commercial Scientific Instruments. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York 1974. Kaettel, G. J., Dollimore, D.: An Introduction to Thermogravimetry. Heyden, London, New York, Rheine 1975. Wendlandt, W. W., Collins, L. W.: Thermal Analysis. Dowden and Hutchinson and Ross, Inc. Stroudsburg PA, 1976. Pope, M. I., Judd, D. D.: Differential Thermal Analysis. Heyden, London, New York, Rheine 1977. Hemminger, W., Hohne, G.: Grundlagen der Kalorimetrie. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim 1979. Schulze, D.: Differentialthemtoanalyse. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin 1979. Lonihardi, G.: For Better Thermal Analysis, 2nd Ed. International Confederation for Thermal Analysis, Rome 1980. Heide, K.: Dynamisch thermische Analysenmethoden. VEB Deutscher Verlag fiir Grundstoffindustrie, Leipzig 1982. Riesen, R., Widmann, G.: Thermoanalyse. Dr. A. Hiithig Verlag, Heidelberg 1984. Dodd, J. W., Tonge, K. H., Currell, B. R.: Thermal Methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1987. Brown, M. E.: Introduction to Thermal Analysis Techniquesand Application. Chapman & Hall, London, New York 1988. Hemminger, W. F., Cammenga, H. K.: Methoden der Themischen Analyse, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1989. Turi, E. A.: Thermal Characterization of Polymeric Materials. Academic Press, New York, London 1981. Kaiserberger, E., Mohler, H.: DSC an Polymenverkstoffen, in: Netzsch-Jahrbiicher f i r Wissenschuft und Praxis, 1. Wurzburg, Selb 1991. DIN 51005 Thermische Analyse (TA) Begriffe. Nov. 1983. DIN 5 1006 Thermische Analyse (TA) Thermogravimetrie (TG) Begriffe, Oktober 1990. DIN 5 1007 (Entwurf) Thermische Analyse (TA) Differenzthermoanalyse (DTA), Grundlagen. DIN 5 1004 (Entwurf) Thermische Analyse, Bestimmung der Schmelztemperaturen kristalliner Stoffe mit der Differenzthennoanalyse DTA. DIN 53 765 (Entwurf) Priifung von Kunststoffen und Elastomeren, Thermische Analyse von Polymeren mit der Dynamischen Differenzkalorimetrie (DDK). ASTM E 472-86 Reporting Thermoanalytical Data.
500
References
[ 1-26] [ 1-27]
ASTM E 473-85 Definition of Terms Relating to Thermal Analysis. ASTM E 9 14-83 Evaluating Temperature Scale for Thermogravimetry. ASTM E 967-83 Temperature Calibration of Differential Thermal Analyzers. ASTM E 968-83 Heat Flow Calibration of Differential Scanning Calorimeters. ASTM D 3947-86 Specific Heat of Aircraft Turbine Lubricants by Thermal Analysis. ASTM D 4419-90 Transition Temperatures of Petroleum Waxes by Differential Scanning Calorimetry. ASTM D 4816-88 Specific Heat of Aircraft Turbine Fuels by Thermal Analysis. ASTM E 487-79 Constant Temperature Stability of Chemical Materials. ASTM E 537-79 Assessing the Thermal Stability of Chemicals by Methods of Differential Thermal Analysis. ASTM E 698-78 Arrhenius Kinetic Constants for Thermally Unstable Materials. ASTM E 793-79 Heats of Fusion and Crystallization by Differential Scanning Calorimetry. ASTM E 794-85 Melting and Crystallization Temperatures by Thermal Analysis. ASTM E I23 1-88 Calculation of Hazard Potential Figures-of-Merit for Thermally Unstable Materials. ASTM D 3417-83 Heat of Fusion and Crystallization of Polymers by Thermal Analysis. ASTM D 3418-82 Transition Temperatures of Polymers by Thermal Analysis. ASTM D 3850-84 Rapid Thermal Degradation of Solid Electrical Insulating Materials by Thermogravimetric Method. ASTM E 1131-86 Compositional Analysis by Thermogravimetry.
[l-281 [l-291 [l-301 [l-311 [ 1-32] [I-331 [1-34]
[I-351 [l-361 [l-371 [l-381 [l-391 [ 1-40] [I-411 [ 1-42]
References Chapter 2 [2-1]
Neumann, H.-J., et al. Composition and Properties of Petroleum. Ferdinand Enke Publishers, Stuttgart 1981.
References Chapter 3 Volker, H.-J., Fischer, H.: Mikrosiedeanalysevon Erdolprodukten mit Hilfe der Thermogravimetrie, in: Konferenz iiber Chemie und chemische Verarbeitung des Erdoles und Erdgases, Budapest 1965, p. 650-656. Akademiai Kiado. Budapest 1968. Mondragon, F., Ouchi, K.: New method for obtaining the distillation curves of petroleum products and coal derived liquids using a small amount of sample. Fuel 63 (1984) p. 61-65. Schwartz, E., et al. Simulated Distillation of High-Boiling Petroleum Fractions by Capillary Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Vacuum Thermal Gravimetric Analysis. Anal. Chem. 59 (1987) p. 1393-1401. Kopsch, H.: Simulierte Destillation mittels Thermogravimetrie.Erdol, Erdgas, Kohle 106 (1990) p. 212-216. DIN 5 1 435: Prtifung von Mineralolen Bestimmung des Siedeverlaufs. Gaschromatographisches Verfahren. ASTM D 2887-84: Standard Test Method for Boiling Range Distribution of Petroleum Fractions by Gas Chromatography. DIN 5 1 75 1: Priifung fliissiger Mineralolkohlenwasserstoffe. Bestimmung des Siedeverlaufes. Glinzer, 0.: Eine allgemeine Dampfdruckbeziehung fiir n-Alkane. Erdol und Kohle, Erdgas, Petrochemie 38 (1985) p. 213-220. Fassihi, M. R., Brigham, W. E., Ramey Jr., H. J.: Reaction Kinetics of In-Situ-Combustion: Part 1 - Observations. SPE-J. 1984 (Aug.) p. 399-407. Weast, R. C. (Ed.): CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. CRC Press Inc. 66th Edition, Boca Raton, Florida 1986.
References
501
[3-111 Landolt-Bomstein:Zahlenwerte und Funktionen aus Physik, Chemie, Astronomie, Geophysik und Technik. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Gottingen, Heidelberg. [3-12] Kopsch, H.: Die Eimittlung der Verdampfungswarme und Siedetemperatur hochsiedender Substanzen mittels DSC. Erdol, Erdgas, Kohle 107 (1992) p. 422-425. [3-131 D’Ans, J., Lax, E.: Taschenbuch fur Chemiker und Physiker 2. Aufl. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Gottingen, Heidelberg 1949 [3-141 ASTM E 698-79: Standard Test Method for Arrhenius Kinetic Constants for Thermally Unstable Materials. [3-15] Kissinger, H. E.: Variation of Peak Temperature with Heating Rate in Differential Thermal Analysis. J. Res. Nut. Bur. Standards 57 (1956) p. 217-221. [3-161 Kissinger, H. E.: Reaction Kinetics in Differential Thermal Analysis. Analyt. Chem. 29 (1957) p. 1702-1706. [3-171 Uricheck, M. J.: The Determination of Kinetic Parameters by Differential Scanning Calorimetry. Instrument News 17 (1966) No. 2, p. 8-9. [3-181 Oshawa, T.: Kinetic Analysis of Derivative Curves in Thermal Analysis. J. Thermal Analysis 2 (1970) p. 301-324. [3-191 Borchardt, H. J., Daniels, F.: The Application of Differential Thermal Analysis to the Study of Reaction Kinetics. J. Am. Chem. SOC. 79 (1957) p. 41-46. [3-201 Jang, W.: A Review of DSC Kinetic Methods. Druckschrilft H-09181 DuPont Company Instrument System. [3-211 Flynn, J. H., Wall, A. L.: A Quick Direct Method for the Determination of Activation Energy from ThermogravimetricData. Polymer Letters 4 (1966) p. 323-328. [3-221 Flynn, J. H., Wall, A. L.: General Treatment of the Thermogravimetry of Polymers. J. Res. Nut. Bur. Standards 70A (1966) No. 6, p. 487-523. [3-231 Zsak6, J., Zsak6, J. jr.: Kinetic Analysis of Thermogravimetric Data, XIV. Three Integrated Methods and their Computer Programs. J. Thermal Analysis 19 (1980) p. 333-345. [3-241 McCarty, J. D., Green, C. E.: An Integral Computer Method of Obtaining Kinetic Parameters from Thermogravimetric Data. Third Middle Atlantic Regional Meeting of the Division of Analytical Chemistry, Philadelphia PA, Feb. 2nd 1968. [3-251 McCarty, M. jr., et al.: Determination of Kinetic Parameters from a Single Thermogram. J. Thermal Analytic 1 (1971) p. 355-367. [3-261 API Research Project 44 Data on Hydrocarbons and Related Compounds. Texas A & M Press, College Station 1969. [3-271 Neumann, H.-J., Rahimian, 1.: Petroleum Refining. Geology of Petroleum Vol. 7 Ed.: H. Beckmann. Ferdinand Enke Publishers, Stuttgart 1984. [3-281 Levy, M.: Oxidation of Pyrolytic Graphite in Air between I250 and 1850 OF. I & E Product Research and Development 1 (1962) p. 19-22. [3-291 Frohne, J. Ch., et al.: Thermoanalytische Methoden zur Charakterisierung von DieselruS. Erdol u. Kohle, Erdgas, Petrochemie 42 (1989) p. 152-157. [3-301 Stahn, U.: Entwicklung und Erprobung einer Methode zur Charakterisieiung von D i e s e m in Hinblick auf Probleme des RuBabbrandes von Abgasfiltem. Diplom-Arbeit, T. U. Clausthal 1989. [3-311 Kopsch, H., Wedepohl, E.: Zur Priifung von Schmierolen mit thermoanalytischenMethoden. Tribologie + Schmierungstechnik 30 (1983) p. 132-138. [3-321 Sakai, T., et al.: A Kinetic Study on the Formation of Aromatics During Pyrolysis of Petroleum Hydrocarbons, in Albright, L. F. und Crynes, B. L.: Industrial and Laboratory Pyrolyses. ACS Symposion Series 32, Washington 1976, p. 152-177. [3-331 Martinez-Alonso, A. et al.: Suitability of thermogravimetry and differential thermal analysis techniques for characterization of pitches. Fuel 71 (1992) p. 611-617. [3-341 Freeman, E. S., Carroll, B.: The Application of ThermoanalyticalTechniques to Reaction Kinetics. The Thermogravimetric Evaluation of the Kinetics of the Decomposition of Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate. J. Phys. Chem. 62 (1958) p. 394-397.
502
References
References Chapter 4 [4-11 [4-21 14-31 L4-41 L4-51 [4-61 L4-71 [4-81 L4-91 [4-101 [4-111 [4-121 [4-131 [4-141 [4-151 [4-161 [4-171 [4-181 [4- 191 [4-201 [4-211 [4-221 [4-231 [4-241
Zerbe, C.: Mineral01 und verwandte Produkte. 2. Auflage, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1969. Pusch, G. et al.: Untersuchungen zur Analytik von Roholen und Tensiden fur den Einsatz in der tertiiiren Erdolgewinnung. DGMK Forsclzungsbericht 295-4, Hamburg 1985. Meyer, G.: Untersuchungen zur Bildung von Paraffinausfallungen aus Roholen und zu deren Beeinflussung durch Inhibitoren. Thesis, T. U. Clausthal 1992. Lane, E. C., Garton. E. L.: U. S. Bureau of Mines, Report oflnvestigation 3279 (1935). DIN 51751: Priifung flussiger Mineralolkohlenwasserstoffe, Bestimmung des Siedeverlaufes ASTM D 2892-84 Standard Test Method for Distillation of Crude Petroleum (15Theoretical Plate Column). IP 24/84 Distillation of Crude Petroleum. Preliminary Distillation. DIN 51 356 Priifung von Schmierolen und fliissigen Brennstoffen.Bestimmung des Siedeverlaufes unter vermindertem Druck nach GroRe-Oetringhaus. IP 78/79 Distillation of Crude Residue. Neumann, H. J., Wilkens, J.: Methode zur Bestimmung der Asphalteue und Erdolharze in Bitumen und Riickstanden, BTAP 25 (1974) p. 246-247. Oelert, H. H.: Entwicklung und Anwendung einer auf IR-NMR-Spektroskopie und Elementanalyse beruhenden Strukturgruppenanalysefiir hohersiedende Kohlenwasserstoffgemische und Mineralolanteile. Z. Anal. Chem. 255 (1971) p. 177-189. Adony, Z.: Thermoanalysis of Petroleum Products. Criticism to the Conradson Number and a Possibility to Determine the Flash Point. Periodica Polytechnica Chem. Engng. 16 (1972) p. 285-298. Kopsch, H.: Simulierte Destillation mittels Thermogravimetrie. Erdol Erdgas Kohle 106 (1990) p. 212-216. Adony, Z.: Differential Thermogravimetry for Distinguishing between Evaporation and Decomposition in ThermogravimetricAnalysis, Periodica Polytechnica Chem. Engng. 10 (1966) p. 325-334. Castellanos, E.: EinfluB von Kolloidbestandteilendes Erdols auf das thermische und hydrothermische Verhalten von Destillationsriickstanden. Thesis, T. U., Clausthal 1989. Kopsch, H., Rahner, S.: Versuche zur Bestimmung des Koksriickstandes inittels Therrnogravimetrie. Erdol und Kohle, Erdgas, Petrochemie 39 (1986) p. 51 1-512. Zorn, H.: Chemische Technologie des Erdols, in: K. Winacker u. L. Kuchler: Chemische Technologie, Vol. 3, p. 230 ff. Carl Hanser Verlag Munchen, Wien 1959. Shih, S.-M., Sohn, H. Y.: Mathematical Model for Retorting of Block of Oil Shale. Fuel 57 (1978) p. 622-630. Levy, J. H., Stuart, W. I.: Div. of Fuel Chemistry and Petroleum Chemistry of American Chemical Society. Symposium St. Louis, 8.-13. Apr. 1984. Kopsch, H. : Thermoanalytische Untersuchungen an schweren Erdol-Destillationsriickstanden und Bitumen. Forschungsbericht des Instituts fur Erdolforschung Nr. 1, Clausthal 1988. Giisfeldt, K.-H.: Ullmann’s Enzyklopadie der Technischen Chemie. 4. Auflage, Vol. 8, p. 527-541. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim 1974. Kopsch, H.: Untersuchungen zum Phasenverhalten von Mischungen aus Bitumen und Hochpolymeren. Sonderforschungsbereich134 “Erdoltechnik - Erdolchemie”, Teilprojekt C 5. Arbeits- und Ergebnisbericht April 1986 - Miirz 1989. Clausthal 1989. Kopsch, H., Wedepohl, E.: Zur Prufung von Schmierstoffen mit thermoanalytischen Methoden. Tribologie + Schmierungstechnik 30 (1983) p. 132-138. Kopsch, H.: Untersuchungen von Schmierstoffenmit thermoanalytischenMethoden. Tribologie + Schmierungstechnik 33 (1986) p. 369-373.
References
503
[4-251 Kopsch, H.: Oxidation Behavior of Heavy Petroleum Products and Kerogenes. Erdol und Kohle, Erdgas, Petrochemie 44 (1991) p. 253-258. [4-261 Abou El Naga, H. H. et al.: Testing Thermooxidation Stability for Industrial Oil via Thermal Analysis Techniques. 6. Int. Kolloquium. Technische Akademie Esslingen, Jan. 1988. [4-271 Zeman, A. et al.: The DSC Cell - A Versatile Tool to Study Thermal-Oxidative Degradation of Lubricants and Related Problems. Thermochimica Acta 80 (1984) p. 1-9. [4-281 Neumann, H.-J.: Oxidationsverhalten von Bitumen bei Gebrauchstemperaturen. Erdol, Erdgas, Kohle 103 (1987) p. 131-133. [4-291 Zdonik, S. B. et al.: Here’s more on how cracking occurs in ethylene pyrolysis. Oil and Gas J. 65 NO. 28 (July 10, 1987) p. 192-196. [4-301 Neumann, H.-J., Rahimian, I.: Petroleum Refining. Ferd. Enke Publishers, Stuttgart 1984 p. 23 ff. [4-311 Noel, F., Corbett, A,: A Study of the Crystalline Phases in Asphalts. J. Inst. Petrol. 56 (1970) NO. 551, p. 261-268. [4-321 Schmidt, R. J., Barrall, E. M.: Asphalt Transitions J. Inst. Petrol. 51 (1965) No. 497, p. 162-168. Differential-Scanning-Calorimetry als analytisches Hilfs[4-331 Trittinger, M., Schindlbauer, mittel in der Erdolchemie. E 1-Erdgas 101 (1985) p. 142-146. [4-341 Heimo, E.-L.: Determination of Cloud Point for Petroleum Middle Distillates by Differential Scanning Calorimetry. Thermochimica Acta 114 (1987) p. 125-130. [4-351 Tietz, U.: Untersuchungen der chemischen und physikalischen Eigenschaften von polymermodifizierten Bitumen und ihre Bedeutung fur die Verarbeitung und das Gebrauchstemperaturverhalten. Thesis, T. U., Clausthal 1993. [4-361 Kopsch, H.: Modifizierung von Bitumen mit Polyethylen mit niedrigem Molekulargewicht. Bitumen 52 (1990) p. 98-101. [4-371 Neumann, H.-J.: Oxidationsverhalten von Bitumen bei Gebrauchstemperaturen. Erdol, Erdgas, Kohle 103 (1987) p. 133-135. [4-381 A1 Douri, A. H., Kopsch, H., Neumann, H.-J.: Bitumen-Oxidation in Gegenwart von Radikalbildnern. Erdol und Kohle, Erdgns, Petrochemie 42 (1989) p. 68-71. [4-391 Kopsch, H.: Auswahlkriterien fur Polymere zur Modifizierung von Bitumen: Alterungsverhalten. Bitumen 54 (1992) p. 63-68. [4-401 Zhang, P.: Katalytische Zusatzstoffe zum Hydrocracking von Erdolvakuumriickstiinden. Thesis, T. U. Clausthal 1988. Thermogravimetiische Untersuchungen von Produkt[4-411 Zhang, P., Kopsch, H., Oelert, 01 aus Hydrocracking von Vak ckstand. Erdol, Erdgas, Kohle 105 (1989) p. 219-222. [4-421 Kopsch, H., Rothe, M.: Thermoanalytische Untersuchungen der Hydrocrackreaktion von schweren Erdol-Destillationsriickstiindenund Produktolen aus dem Hydrocracking. Erdol, Erdgas, Kohle 106 (1990) p. 29-34. [4-431 Oelert, H. H.: Integrated Two-Stage Noncatalytic Hydrogenative Upgrading of Petroleum Residue (1): Reactions and Product Distribution Erdol, Erdgas, Kohle 103 (1987) p. 437440. [4-441 Riediger, B.: Die Verarbeitung des Erdols, p. 268, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1971. [4-451 Hendrickson, T. A., Rammler, R. W.: Olschiefer und Schieferol, in: Ullmanns Enzyklopadie der technischen Chemie. 4. Aufl. Vol. 17, p. 427-450. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim 1979. [4-461 Putun, E. et al.: Chemistry and Geochemistry of Turkish oil shale kerogens. Fuel 67 (1988) p. 1106-1110. [4-471 Skala, D., Kopsch, H. et al.: Thermogravimetrically and differential scanning calorimetrically derived kinetics of oil shale pyrolysis. Fuel 66 (1987) p. 1185-1192. [4-481 Skala, D., Kopsch, H. et al.: Modelling and simulation of oil shale pyrolysis. Fuel 68 (1989) p. 168-173. [4-491 Skala, D., Kopsch, H. et al.: Kinetics and modelling of oil shale pyrolysis. Fuel 69 (1990) p. 490-496.
504
References
[4-501 Skala, D., Kopsch, H., Sokic, M.: Oil Shale Pyrolysis - A New Approach to the Kinetic Investigation of Different Kerogen Type Samples. Thermochimica Acta 134 (1998) p. 353358. [4-511 Skala, D., Kopsch, H. et al.: Kinetic Analysis of Consecutive Reactions Using TG and DSC Techniques. J. Thermal Analysis 35 (1989) p. 1441-1458. [4-521 Doyle, C. D.: Kinetic Analysis of Thermogravimetric Data. J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 5 (1961) p. 285-292. [4-531 Gorbachev, V. M. J.: Criterion of the Existence of Compensation Relationship for NonIsothermal Kinetics. J. Thermal Analysis 8 (1975) p. 595-587. [4-541 Wen, C. S., Koblinski, T. P.: Low Temperature Oil Shale Conversion. Fuel 62 (1983) p. 1269-1273. [4-551 Finucane, D. et al.: Perturbation analysis of second-order effects in kinetics of oil shale pyrolysis. Fuel 56 (1977) p. 65-68. [4-561 Wallman, P. H., Tamm, P. W., Spars, G. B.: Oil Shale Retorting Kinetics in Oil Shale, Tar Sands, and Related Materials. Am. Chem. SOC.Symp. Ser. 163 (1981) p. 93-113. [4-571 Skala, D., Kopsch, H. et al.: Kinetische Untersuchungen der nichtisothermenOxidation von Olschiefern. Proceed. XXXII, Meeting of Serbian Chemists, Belgrad, Jan. 1990, p. 190, in Serbo-Kroatisch. [4-581 Krawetz, A. A., Tovrog, T.: Differential Thermal Analysis for Estimation of the Relative Thermal Stability of Lubricants. Z & EC Product Research and Development 5, No. 2 (June 1966) p. 191-198. [4-591 Vajta, L. et al.: DerivatographicExamination of the Thermal Stability of some Lubricating Oil Additives. Acta Chimica Academie Scientorum Hungaricae 58 (1968) p. 207-229. [4-601 Noel, F.: The Characterizationof Lube Oils and Fuel Oils by DSC Analysis. J. Znst. Petrol. (London) 37 (1971) No. 558 p. 354-358. [4-611 Noel, F.: Thermal Analysis of Lubricating Oils. Themzochimica Acta 4 (1972) p. 377-392. [4-621 Commichau, A.: Beitrag zur Bestimmung der Alterungsstabilitatvon Schmierstoffendurch DTA. Erdol und Kohle, Erdgas, Petrochemie 25 (1972) p. 322-327. [4-631 Noel, F., Cranton, G. E.: Application of Scanning Calorimetry to Petroleum Oil Oxidation Studies. 3rd. Analytical Calorimetry Conference, Vol. 3, p. 305-320. Plenum Press, New York 1974. [4-641 Blaine, R. L.: Thermal analytical characterizationof oils and lubricants. American Laborat o y 18 (1974) NO. 1, p. 18-20. [4-651 LovBsz, C.: Thermische Stabilitat von Schmierstoffen. Erdol und Kohle, Erdgas, Petrochemie 30 (1977) p. 219-223. [4-661 Walker, J. A,, Tsang, W.: Application of Differential Scanning Calorimetry to the Characterization of Lubricating Oils. NBS Special Publication 584 (Nov. 1980). [4-671 Hsu, M. S., Cummings, A. L.: Thermogravimetric Analysis of Lubricants. SAE Special Publicaiton SP-558 (1983). [4-681 Hsu, M. S. et al.: Evaluation of Automotive Crankcase Lubricants by Differential Scanning Calorimetry. SAE Special Publication SP-526 (1982) p. 127-139. [4-691 Garbe, W.: Bestimmung der Oxidationsstabilitaten an Schmierolen. Erdol und Kohle, Erdgas, Petrochemie 35 (1982) p. 141. [4-701 Zeman, A.: DSC und PDSC, Anwendungsmoglichkeiten bei der Bestimmung der Oxidations- und thennischen Stabilitat von synthetischen Flugzeugturbinenolen.Schmiertechnik + Tribologie 29 (1982) p. 55-58. [4-711 Zeman, A., Bartl, P.: Quality Control of Used SyntheticAviation Turbine Oils by Analytical Methods. I1 Determination of the Antioxidative Capacity and the Maximum ServiceLife by Pressure Differential Scanning Calorimetry.Fresenius’ Ztg. Anal. Chem. 316 (1983) p. 4346. [4-721 Rumpf, T., Schindlbauer, H.: Matrixeinfliisse auf die thermische Zersetzung von Zink (0,O’ - dialkylthiophosphat)bei der Analyse von Schmieroladditiven.Fresenius’ Ztg. Anal. Chem. 315 (1983) p. 350-352.
References
505
[4-731 Zeman, A. et al.: The DSC-Cell - A Versatile Tool to Study ThermaloxidativeDegradation of Lubricants and Related Problems. Thermochimica Acta 80 (1984) p. 1-9. [4-741 Zeman, A. et al.: Zur Kenntnis der Alterung von Neopentylpolyesterolen (I). Tribologie und Schmierungstechnik 31 (1984) p. 72-77. [4-751 Abou el Naga, H. H., Salem, A. E. M.: Testing Thermal Stability for Base Oils via Thermogravimetric Balance and Differential Thermal Analyzer. Lubrication Engng. 41 (1985) p. 470-476. [4-761 Abou el Naga, H. H., Salem, A. E. M.: Testing the Thermooxidation of Lubricating Oils via Differential Thermal Analysis. J. Thermal Aml. 32 (1987) p. 1401-1413. [4-771 Abas, K. F., Sadek, J.: Characterization of Fresh and Used Diesel Engine Oils by Differential Scanning Calorimetry. Thermochimica Acta 126 (1988) p. 181-185. [4-781 Kopsch, H., Wedepohl, E.: Untersuchungen zur Verdampfung von Schmierolen. Schmiertechnik + Tribologie 27 (1980) p. 156-160. [4-791 Kopsch, H., Wedepohl, E.: Zur Priifung von Schmierstoffenmit thennoanalytischenMethoden. Tribologie + Schmierungstechnik 30 (1983) p. 132-138. [4-801 Kopsch, H.: Untersuchungen von Schmierstoffen mit thermoanalytischen Methoden. Verdeich von Erstraffinaten. Reraffinaten und svnthetischen Schmierstoffen. Tribologie - + . ichmierungstechnik 33 (1986) p. 369-373. [4-811 Strofer, W.: Beitrag zur Optimierung des hydrostatischen Lagersystems kontinuierlicher Spanplatten-Pressen. Thesis, T. U. Clausthal 1989. [4-821 Kopsch, H., Strofer, W.: Ermittlung des Alterungsverhaltensthermooxidativ beanspnichter Siliconole. Tribologie + Schmierungstechnik 38 (1991) p. 36-42. [4-831 Noll, W.: Chemie und Technologie der Silikone. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim 1968. [4-841 Shu, W. R., Hartman, K. J.: Thermal Visbreaking of Heavy Oil During Steam Recovery Processes. SPE Reservoir Engng. 1986 (Sept.) p. 474-482. [4-851 Fabus, B. M. et al.: Thermal Cracking of Pure SaturatedHydrocarbons,in: McKetta Jr., J. J. (Ed.): Advances in Petroleum Chemistry and Refining. Vol. 9, p. 157-201. Interscience Publishers, New York, London, Sydney 1964. [4-861 Abu-Khamsin, S. et al.: Reaction Kinetics of Fuel Formation for In-Situ-Combustion. SPE Reservoir Engng. 1988 (Nov.) p. 1308-1316. [4-871 Henderson, J. H., Weber, L.: Physical Upgrading of Heavy Crude Oils by the Application of Heat. J. Canad. Petrol. Technol. 1965 (Oct. - Dec.) p. 206-212. [4-881 Fernandez Lozano, J. A. et al.: The Thermal Degradation of Bitumen from the Faja of the Orinoco. Ind. Engng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 17 (1978) No. 1, p. 71-79. [4-891 Hayashitani, M. et al.: Thermal Cracking Models for Athabasca Oil Sands Oil. SPE-Paper No. 7549 (1978). [4-901 Phillips, R. C. et al.: Kinetic Models for the Thermal Cracking of Athabasca Bitumen. Fuel 64 (1985) p. 678-691. [4-911 Lin, C. Y. et al.: New Kinetic Models for the Thermal Cracking of Crude Oils in In-SituCombustion Processes. SPE Reservoir Engng. 1987 (Febr.) p. 54-66. [4-921 Behar, F. et al.: Experimental Study and Kinetic Modelling of Crude Oil Pyrolysis in Relation to Thermal Recovery Processes. 4th. UNITARIUNDP Coizjerence on Heavy Crude and Tar Sands 1988, Paper No. 97. [4-931 Bousaid, J. S., Ramey, H. H. Jr.: Oxidation of Crude Oil in Porous Media. SPE-J. 1968 (June) p. 137-148. [4-941 Dabbous, M. K., Fulton, P. F.: Low-Temperature-Oxidation,Reaction Kinetics and Effects on the In-Situ-Combustion Process. SPE-J. 1974 (June) p. 253-262. [4-951 h a , K. N., Verkoczy, B.: The Role of the Thermal Analysis Technique in the In-SituCombustion Process. SPEIDOE No. 12677 (1981). [4-961 Yoshiki, K. S., Phillips, C. P.: Kinetics of the Thermo-Oxidative and Thermal Cracking Reaction of Athabasca Bitumen. Fuel 64 (1985) p. 1591-1598. [4-971 Vossoughi, S., El-Shoubary,Y.: Kinetic of Crude Oil Coke Combustion. SPE Reservoir Engng. 1989 (May) p. 201-206.
506
References
Arnold, Ch., Jr.: Effects of Heating Rate on the Pyrolysis of Oil Shale, in: L. F. Albright and B. L. Crynes (Ed.): Industrial and Laboratory Pyrolysis ACS Symposium Series No. 32, p. 492-503 American Chemical Society, Washington 1976. [4-991 Granoff, B., Nuttall, H. E., Jr.: Pyrolysis Kinetics for Oil Shale Particles. Fuel 56 (1977) p. 234-240. [4-1001 Sekhar, M. V. C., Ternen, M.: Thermogravimetric Studies on Catalytic and Noncatalytic Pyrolysis of Pitch Derived from Hydrocracked Athabasca Bitumen. Fuel 58 (1979) p. 92[4-98]
98. [4-1011 Haddadin, R. A,, Tawarah, K. M.: DTA Derived Kinetics of Jordan Oil Shale. Fuel 59 (1980) p. 539-543. [4- 1021 Williams, P. F.: Thermogravimetry and Decomposition Kinetics of British Kimmeridge Clay Oil Shale. Fuel 64 (1985) p. 540-545. [4-1031 Vossoughi, S. et al.: Development of a Kinetic Model for In-Situ-Combustion and Prediction of the Process Variables Using TGA/DSC Techniques. SPE Paper 11073 (1982). [4-1041 Vossoughi, S. et al.: Study of the Clay Effect on Crude Oil Combustion by Thermogravimetry and Differential Scanning Calorimetry. J. Thermal Analysis 27 (1983) p. 17-36. [4-1051 Vantelon, J. P. et al.: Thermal Degradation of Timahdit Oil Shales: Behavior in Inert and Oxidizing Environments. Fuel 69 (1990) p. 211-215. [4-1061 Carangelo, R. M. et al.: Application of TG-FT-IR to Study Hydrocarbon Structure and Kinetics. Fuel 66 (1987) p. 960-967.
References Chapter 5 Kopsch, H.: Zum Verhalten von polymennodifizierten Bitumen bei tiefen Temperaturen. Bitumen 52 (1990) p. 10-13. Zeman, A. : Ablagerungen in Flugtriebwerken. Untersuchungen mittels thermoanalytischer Verfahren. Tribologie + Schmiertechnik 37 (1990) p. 96-104. Abus, K. F., Sadek, I.: Characterization of Fresh and Used Diesel Engine Oils by Differential Scanning Calorimetry. Thermochimica Acta 126 (1988) p. 181-185. Ohrbach, K. H. et al.: Charakterisierung von Mineralolen mit Hilfe simultaner Thermoanalyse-Massenspektrometrie. Erdol und Kohle, Erdgas, Petrochernie 39 (1986) p. 289290.
N. N.: Die Funktion des registrierenden Differential-Kalorimeters DSC 2. Analysentechnische Berichte (Reports on Analysis Techniques) Heft 35 (1974), Bodenseewerk Perkin Elmer & Co. GmbH. Emmerich, W. D., Kaisersberger, E.: Simultaneous TG-DTA Mass-Spectrometry to 1550 "C. J. Thermal Analysis 17 (1979) p. 197-212. Jen Chiu: Polynier Characterization by Coupled Thermogravimetry-Gas Chromatography. Analyt. Chemistry 40 (1968) p. 1516-1520. Gardner, N. C. et al.: Thermogravimetric Measurements at High Pressures. National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 580 (1980). Levy, P. F.: Pressure Differential Scanning Calorimetry. Thermochimica Acta 1 (1970) p. 429-439. Naumann, R.: Neue Moglichkeiten der Anwendung des Tian-Calvet-Prinzips in der therrnschen Analyse. Teil 1: CLB Chemie in Labor und Biotechnik 42 (1991) p. 613-617. Teil2: ibid. 42 (1991) p. 666-673
Thermal Methods in Petroleum Analysis by. Heinz Kopsch CopyrightoVCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 1995
Index
Activated Carbon (Charcoal) - DSC Oxidation 421 ff - Oxidation in Air 426 Activation Energy 177 Additive Package 366 - TGA 367 Additives - DSC Oxidation 361 f - Evaporation Loss in Air 357 Aging of - Bitumen 267 f - PMB 267 f - Polymers 287 ff - Silicone Oils 389 -- TGA 383 ff Alkanes 13 rz-Alkanes 21 - Activation Energy 80 - ASTM E 698-79, DSC Kinetics 79 f - BP, STA 51 ff - Crystallization, DSC 59 - DSC 54 ff - Enthalpy of Vaporization 81 - Evaporation, DSC 55 - Final Boiling Point 57 - HD-Polyethylenes 82 - Hf, DSC 59, 62 - Hf, STA 51 ff - H, 77f, 81 - Hv, DSC 75 - Hv, STA 54 - Initial Boiling Point 57 - Kinetic of Vaporization 95 - Maxima of Weight Loss Rate 34 - Melting Behavior, DSC 61 - MP, DSC 59 - MP, STA 50 - Onset Temperature of Oxidation 65 - Oxidation 40, 64 ff -- Kinetics 85 -- Reaction 39
- Pyrolysis Kinetics 82 - Reaction 40 - Start Temperature of Oxidation 65 - Temperatures of Vaporization 53 - TGA 30 - Weight Loss 35 f Alkylpyrenes - TGA 26 - Thermal Behaviour 26 Alkylsubstituted Pyrenes 58 Alpha-Olefine Copolymers 265 Analysis of - Oil Shale 321 f - Vacuum Distillates 351 - VVR and VR 305 Arabian Heavy Crude, TGA 125 Arabian Light Crude, TGA 126 Aromatics 13 - Boiling Points 27 - BP, DSC 58 - DSC59 - Oxidation Kinetics 87 - Pyrolysis 83 - Gas Phase Pyrolysis 83 - MP, DSC 58 - - Oxidation, DSC 66 - - Oxidation Reaction 43 f - Pyrolysis Kinetics 83 f - Temperature Statistics 22 - TGA25 Arrhenius Coefficients 236, 317 - of Bitumen Oxidation 251 ff Arrhenius Equation 68 Asphaltenes 115 - Arrhenius Coefficients 236, 239 - DTG201 - Elemental Analysis 193 - TGA in Air, Index Numbers 222 - in Argon, TGA 200 - Isothermal Gravimetry 348 - Oxidation 253
508
Index
- Residue, TGA 216
ASTM D 2887-84 15 f, 31, 36 - Simulated Distillation 36 ff ASTM E 698-79 - DSC Experiments 462 - H,, DSC 75 - Kinetics 460 ff -- DSC 69 f, 82,429 ff -- DTA 429 ff -- DTG 439 f -- Errors 478 -- TGA/DTA 439 f - Oxidation Kinetics -- DSC 84ff -- TGA/DTA 467 ff - Reaction Kinetics 68 - Vaporization Activation Energy 76 Atactic Polypropylene (aPP) 265 Atmospheric Residue 112, 146 - TGA 150f Average C-Number 160 Average Relative Particle Masses 160
- Coke Residue 210
-
DTG 202 Isothermal Thermogravimetry 228 Oxidation 253 Pyrolysis Kinetics -- Activation Energy E 242 -- Frequency Factor log A 242 -- Half Life Time 242 Boiling Behavior of Hydrocarbons 13 Boiling Behavior, STA 49 ff Boiling Point (BP) 51 - of n-Alkanes 15 - Refinery Residues, DSC 169 Borchardt and Daniels - Integration Limits 441 - Kinetics, DTA 440 ff - Oxidation Kinetics, DTA 468 ff - Reaction Kinetics 68, 70 ff, 89 BP, see Boiling Point 51 Breaking Point (FraaR) 188 Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate 4 f - Decomposition Kinetics 93
Basic Oil 349 - DSC Oxidation 362 f - Evaporation Loss in Air 357 - TGA 354 Bitumen 146, 187 ff - Blown 187 - Characterization 187 ff - Conclusions 258 - DSC in Argon 233 ff - DSC Pyrolysis 430 ff - in Air 217 ff -- Index Numbers, TGA 219 ff - Isothermal Aging 226 ff - Isothermal Gravimetry 276 ff - Low Temperature Behavior 258 - LTO 256 f -- DSC 256f - Oxidation 458, 463 ff, 467 ff -- in Air 247 ff -- Kinetics 294 - Pyrolysis 178 f, 443 ff - Residues 112 - Semiblown 187 - Simulated Distillation 138 ff - TGA 203 ff, 217ff -- in Inert Gas 195 Bitumen B80 - DSC 75 - TGA 120 ff Blown Bitumen 187, 194
- Pyrolysis Kinetics 89 ff Calculation - from TGA Curve 36 -- of Boiling Temperatures 36 -- of Distillation Curve 36 Calibration Curve, DSC 11 Calibration Standard 4 Calibration, TGA 28 f Carbon, Oxidation, DSC 66 f Characterization - of PMB 265 - Refinery Residues 114 ff Charcoal 67 Clansins Clapeyron 172 Coefficient of Variation 32 - TGA 119 Coke Residue 171 - Blown Bitumens 210 - Distillation Bitumens 210 - TGA 20 Colloid Composition 428 - of Bitumen 190 - of Blown Bitumen 194 Colloid Precipitation 190 Colloidal Components of Bitumen, TGA 196 Colloidal Composition 114, 160 - Refinery Residues 115 Commercial Computer Programs 427 ff Complex Hydrocarbons 13 Composition of Oil Shales 332 ff
Index Condensed Aromatics, Boiling Points 27 Conradson Coke Residue (CCR) 113 f, 132, 136, 144ff, 171, 182ff Consistency Data of Bitumen 190, 266 Conversion Products 112 Conversion Residues 112 Coronene, Isothermal Thermogravimetry 49 Correlation of Data of Refinery Residues 186 Correlation of Index Numbers, Refinery Residues 160ff Crackable Part - CR (Crackable Residue) 207 -- of Bitumen 210 -- of Refinery Residues 182 -- TGA 207ff - CR/ND Ratio 137 - of Heavy Residues 316 Cracker Residues 146 Cracking Enthalpies of Refinery Residues 174 f Cracking Process - of Bitumen, Start Temperature 243 ff - of Refinery Residues 184 -- in Inert Atmosphere, Start Temperature 166 Crude Oil 99 ff, 106 ff - Crystallization 110 -- DSC 109f - Distillation Curves 103 - DSC 106ff, 110 - Glas Transistion Temperature 110 - Pour Point 110 Cnides, Thermal Refining 97 Cycloakanes 13 Decomposition Kinetics Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate 93 Degasified Crude 99 ff Derivate Thermogravimetry, see DTG 1 Derived Index Numbers 98 - of Refinery Residues 136, 144 Differential Scanning Calorimetry, see DSC 1, 10, 54 ff, 233 ff, 487 Di-iso-tridecyl Adipate (DITDA) 365 f Directly Measured Index Numbers, Refinery Residues 143 f, 154 ff Dispersion Medium 177 - Arrhenius Coefficients 236 ff, 252 - DSC Oxidation 411 - Elemental Analysis 192 - in Air, TGA 221 - in Argon, TGA 198 - Oxidation 252
509
Distillable Fraction of Refinery Residues 132 Distillation Bitumen 187, 194, 210 - Arrhenius Coefficients 251 - Coke Residue 210 - Distillable Part, TGA 212 f - Isothermal Thermogravimetry 228 - Oxidation 248, 251 - Pyrolysis Kinetics 241 -- Activation Energy E 235 -- Conversion U 235 -- Frequency Factor log A 235 -- Half Life Time 235 Distillation Curve 36 - Crude Oil 103 - Heavy Crudes 106 Distillation Maximum of Refinery Residues, DTC Curve 157 Doped Oils, DSC Oxidation 362 f Drilling Fluids 485 DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimetry) I, 10, 54 ff, 233 ff, 487 - n-Alkanes 54 ff - Calibration Curve 11 - Cell Cross-Section 12 - Crude Oils 106, 110 - Heating/Cooling Curve 286 ff - in Inert Atmosphere 54 ff - in Oxidizing Atmosphere 63 - Kinetics 6 f, 167 ff, 184 ff, 290 ff -- Hydropyrolysis 3 17 ff -- of Oil Shale 335 f -- Silicon Oils 394 ff - of Bitumen -- in Argon 233 ff -- in Methane 237 ff - of Refinery Residues 167 - on Model Substances 54 - Oxidation - Peak Maximum Temperature 412 -- of Bitumen 255 - Oxidation Kinetics 84 ff, 283 -- of Silicon Oils 394 ff - Oxidation, Pressure 410 ff - Pyrolysis 82, 167 ff -- Kinetics 400 -- of Bitumen 244 ff -- PMB 283 -- Reaction Constant 320 - Standards 11 DTG (Derivate Thermogravimetry) 1 - Definition 3 - Heavy Oils 301 - Refinery Residues 133
510
Index
Dynamic Mechanical Thermal Analyzer (DMTA) 486 Dynamic (Temperature-Programmed) Thermogravimetry of PMB 269 ff Efficiency of Catalysts 486 nBicosane, Melting Curve 61 Element Analysis 114 - of Bitumen 191 Elementar Carbon, DSC Oxidation Kinetics 88 Enhanced Oil Recovery 485 Enthalpy of Pyrolysis - PMB 285 - Refinery Residues 175 Enthalpy of Vaporization 8 1 Ethylene-Acrylic Ester-Acrylic Acid Terpolymers (AECM) 265 Ethylene-Propylene Copolymers (EPM) 265 Ethylene-Propylene-Diene Terpolymers (EPDM) 265 Ethylene-Vinyl-Acetate Copolymers (EVA) 265 Evaporation - Behavior of Lubrication Oils 349 - DSC 185 - LOSS 353, 355 ff, 370 f - Start Temperature -- n-Alkanes 21 -- Bitumen 195 -- Refinery Residues, DSC 175 f -- TGA 17 Extraction Solvent, Solubility Parameter 328 Final Boiling Point, DSC 57 Fingerprinting of Oil Shale 345 ff First Oxidation Maximum of Refinery Residues 158 Flynn and Wall - Kinetics 442 ff, 478 - Oxidation Kinetics, TGA 469 ff - Reaction Kinetics 68, 72 f, 89 f Fourier Transformation Infrared Spectrometer (TG-FTIR) 487 Fuel Combustion 41 ff, 410 - Range 422 ff Fuel Deposition 41 ff, 410 - Range415 Furnance, Water-cooled 8 Gas Flow Rate, TGA 3 German Crudes - Specifications 100 f - TGA 105ff
Graphite, Oxidation in Air 426 Half Life Time Refinery Residues, DSC 170 ff Hc, see Heat of Combustion 67 HD-Polyethylene - Crystallinity 62 - Hf62 - Isothermal Thermogravimetry 46 - Oxidation, DSC 65 - Pyrolysis Kinetics 82 - TGA42 Heat Flux DSC 487 f Heat of Combustion ( H J 67 ff Heat of Fusion (Hf)51 Heat of Vaporization (H,) 52 Heating Rate, TGA 3 Heavy Crudes - Distillation Curves 106 - Evaporation, DSC 107 - Pyrolysis 107 - Simulated Boiling Curves 104 - Simulated Distillation, TGA 106 ff - Start of Oxidation 104 - TGA 104ff, 107ff Heavy Oils 301, 309 Heavy Petroleum Products, Oxidation Reactions 427 ff Heavy Residues - Crackable Part 316 - Hydrocracking 296 ff, 304 ff -- TGA314 - Hydropyrolysis, DTG 3 13 n-Heneicosane, DSC 60 n-Hexacontane 18 - DSC 55, 64f -- Oxidation 410,412 - in Air, TGA 44 - Isothermal Thermogravimetry 47 - Pyrolysis, Kinetics 70 - TGA 29,40 n-Hexatricontane 19 n-Hexylpyrene, TGA 43 Hf, see Heat of Fusion 51 High Density Polyethylenes, DSC 63 High Oxidation Stability 360 High Resolution Thermogravimetry (HI-RESTGA) 492 Horizontal Thermobalance 488 H,, see Heat of Vaporization 52 Hydrocarbons 13, 85 f Hydrocracking - of Heavy Oils 301 f - of Heavy Residues 304 ff, 314
Index
of Vacuum Residue 300 Reaction of Heavy Residues 296 ff - Reaction Products, TGA 300 f, 303 Hydrogen Consumption 302 Hydropyrolysis - Kinetics, DSC 317 ff - of Heavy Oils 309 - of Heavy Residues 313, 315 ff, 319 - of VR and VVR, TGA 306 ff
Air 277 ff of Bitumen 276 ff - of Polymers 289 ff
-
-
-
-
In situ Combustion 400 Index Numbers 98, 130, 195 - Asphaltenes in Air 222 - Correlation 316 - of Bitumen, TGA 197, 219 f - of Heavy Oil Hydropyrolysis, TGA 309 - of Lubrication Oils, TGA 354 - of PMB, TGA 270 ff - of Reclaimed Oils 367 f - of Refinery Residues 143 f, 154 ff -- Correlation with Analytical Data 160 ff -- Repeatability 164 -- Simulated Cracking 163 f -- TGA 182 - of Silicone Oils 382, 386 - of Synthetic Oils 368 - of Virgin Oils 367 f - Petroleum Resins in Air 222 - TGA 119 - Tolerances 123 - Vacuum Residue, TGA 297 Indium 11 Induction Period 45 Inert Atmosphere, DSC 54 - TGA 123 ff Inert Gas, TGA of Bitumen 195 Initial Boiling Point, DSC 57 Initial Boiling Temperature, TGA 17 Instruments 487 ff Integration Limits 441 Iranian Heavy, Thermal Cracker Residue, TGA 129 Isothermal Aging of Bitumen in Air 226 Isothermal Aging Test of Bitumen 225 ff Isothermal Gravimetry - of Asphaltenes 348 - of Kerogen Concentrate 347 - of Oil Shale 346 - of PMB 275 ff - of Polymers 290 ff Isothermal Pyrolysis, Multi-Step-Model 344 Isothermal Thermogravimetry 45 f, 188, 228
511
Kerogen Concentrate from Oil Shale, TGA 324 - Isothermal Gravimetry 346 f Kerogen Elemental Analysis 321 Kinetic - Coefficients of Oil Shale 334 - Computer Programs 427 - Half Life Time 185 - Oil Shale 329 ff, 335 f - Oxidation, DSC 84 ff - Oxidation Reaction 458 - Parameters of Refineiy Residues 176 - Pyrolysis 185, 427 ff -- 10 bar Methane, DSC 172 -- DSC 290 -- of Bitumen, DSC 233 ff -- Refinery Residues 170 ff - Pyrolysis Reaction 429 ff - Rate Constant 185 - Repeatability 477 - Software 428,481 - Vaporization 95, 185 Kuwait Crude, TGA 124, 127 -
Le Chatelier’s Principle 185 Linear Polyethylens, TGA 24 Low Temperature Behavior 60 - of Bitumen 258 - of PMB, DSC 285 ff Low Temperature Oxidation, see LTO 40 ff LTO (Low Temperature Oxidation) 40 ff, 410 f - Activation Energy 413 - n-Alkanes 41 - Bitumen, DSC 256 - Frequency Factor 4 13 - Half Life Time 414 - HD-Polyethylene 42 - Polybutadiene 41 - Polymers 295 - Range 412,415 Lubricant Additives 485 Lubricants 348 ff Lubrication Oil - Base Oils 349 - DSC Recorder Graph 359 - Evaporation, TGA 349 - Index Numbers 354 ff - Oxidation Behavior 358 - Oxidation Stability 371, 374
512
Index
- Oxidation Start Temperatures 359 ff
Magnetic Suspension Thermobalance 491 Maltenes 180 Manufacturers 495 ff Maxima of Weight Loss Rate 34 McCarty and Green - Kinetics 95, 453 ff -- Integration Limits 453, 479 - Oxidation Kinetics, TGA 472 ff - Pyrolysis Kinetics 457 - Reaction Kinetics 68, 74 f - TGA Kinetics 94 ff Mean Relative Particle Mass 114 Melting (Fusion) Behavior, STA 49 ff Melting Point Temperature, see MP 50 Mineral Matrix Composition of Oil Shale 330 Model Mixtures, Thermal Behavior 23 f Model Parameters, Simulation of Pyrolysis 340 Model Substances 15 ff - DSC 54 ff - Kinetic Investigations 75 Modelling 331 - of Oil Shale Pyrolysis 337 Modulated Differential Scanning Calorimetry (MDSC) 492 MP (Melting Point Temperature) 50 - Influence on Crystallization 60 Multi Grade Oil 350 - Evaporation Loss in Air 356 f Multi-Step-Model (MSM) 337, 344 Needle Penetration 187 - of Bitumen 205 Noak Evaporation Loss Test 353, 355 Non-Isothermal Pyrolysis of Oil Shale 339, 341 ff Oil Shale 321 ff - Composition 332 - Extracts, TGA 327 ff - Fingerprinting 345 ff - Isothermal Gravimetry 346 - Mineral Matrix Composition 330 - Non-Isothermal Pyrolysis 341 ff - Pyrolysates, TGA 325 f - Pyrolysis Kinetics 332 - Pyrolysis, Modelling and Simulation 331,337 - Retorting Residues 326 - TGA 323. 331 Organic Sulphur Compounds 485 Oven Aging of Polymethylsiloxanes 379
Oven-Aged Silicone Oils, TGA 382, 386 Oxidation - Fuel Combustion, DSC 64 - Fuel Deposition, DSC 63 - Low Temperature Oxidation, LTO, DSC 63 - of n-Alkanes 39 ff - of Aromatics, DSC 66 - of Asphaltenes 250 - of Bitumen 247 ff -- Start Temperature 264 - of Carbon, DSC 66 f - of Oil Shale 345 - of Petroleum Resins 250 - of Polybutadiene, DSC - of Polysiloxanes, DSC 393 - of Silicone Oils, Reaction Rate Constant 397 - Reaction Enthalpy 483 - TGA 38 ff Oxidation Kinetics 458, 466 - DSC 84ff - of Bitumen 264, 294 - of Oil Shale 329 f, 345 - of PMB 283 ff - of Polymers 294 - of Silicone Oils 391 ff - Pressure 410 ff - Repeatability 477 Oxidation Reaction - Aromatics 43 f - Fuel Combustion 41 ff - Fuel Decomposition 41 ff - Induction Period 45 - Kinetics 400 ff - LTO 40 ff Oxidation Refinery Residue, TGA 147 ff Oxidation Stability - Lubrication Oils 374 - Silicone Oils 398 f Oxidation Start of Bitumen 224 Oxidation Start Temperature 44, 183 Oxidation Tests, DSC 410 ff Oxide Ash 114 Oxidizing Atmosphere - DSC 63 - TGA 38ff Particle Mass of Bitumen 191 Peak Maximum Temperature - of Evaporation 55 - Refinery Residues 169 f Penetration - of Blown Bitumen 194 - Refinery Residues 113 ff
Index Performance Additive 349, 360 Petroleum 97 ff - Boiling Behavior 13 - Distillation Residue 10 - Elementary Composition 13 - Hydrocarbons 13 - Processing Temperatures 1 - Products 97 ff - Resins 115 -- Anhenius Coefficients 236, 239, 252 -- Elemental Analysis 192 -- in Air, TGA Index Numbers 222 -- in Argon, TGA 199 -- Oxidation 252 -- Pyrolysis 440, 456 - Thermal Behavior 97 PMB (Polymer Modified Bitumens) 265 ff - Aging in Air 268 - Characterization 265 - Consistency Data 266 - Index Numbers, TGA 270 ff - Isothermal Gravimetry 275 ff - Low Temperature Behavior 285 ff Point of Inflexion 20, 182 Polyalphaolein (PAO) 365 Polybutadiene 41, 66 f Polydimethylsiloxanes 377 ff Polyethylene (PE) 24 f, 265 ff Polymer Modified Bitumens, see PMB 265 Polymeric Modifiers 485 Polymers - Aging Properties 287 ff - LTO 295 - Oxidation Kinetics 294 - TGA 289 ff Polymethylphenylsiloxanes 377 ff - Isothermal Gravimetry 381 - vaporization Loss 380 Polymethylsiloxanes, Vaporization Loss 380 Polysiloxanes 379, 395 f Pour Point Depressant 111, 485 Power Compensation, DSC 487 Practical Thermally Crackable Part (PCR) 144, 183 Pressure Regulation, DSC 424 Protecting Gas 9 Pyrene 25 f Pyrolsyis - Coke Residue 171 - Conversions U 317 - Enthalpy of Refinery Residues 174 f, 186 - of Bitumen, Peak Maximum Temperature, DSC 246
513
of Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate, Reaction Kinetics 89 ff - of Distillation Bitumen 241 - of Oil Shale, MSM 338 - of Refinery Residues 168 - Pressure 400 ff, 405 - Reaction Enthalpy 483 - Reaction of Refinery Residues 176, 181 - Start Temperature of Refinery Residues 184 -- DSC 175f - TGA 16f, 20 Pyrolysis Kinetics 400 ff, 439 - 10 bar Methane, DSC 172 - Computer Programs 427 - DSC 400 - of Bitumen 237 ff, 261 ff -- Activation Energy E 234 -- Conversion U 234 -- DSC 233 ff -- Frequency Factor log A 234 - of Blown Bitumen 242 - of Distillation Bitumen 241 - of Oil Shale 329 f, 332 ff - of PMB 283 ff - Refinery Residues, DSC 170 ff - Repeatability 477 Pyrolysis Reaction, Kinetics 429 ff -
Quotient of Loss Q 260, 279 ff Range of Fuel Combustion, DSC Oxidation 421 Range of Fuel Deposition 415 Reaction Kinetics - Applicability of Thermoanalysis 483 - DSC 68 ff - of PMB 283 ff - of Refinery Residues 184 ff - Oxidation of Silicone Oils 391 - Pyrolysis of Bitumen 261 ff - TGA 90, 94 Reaction Rate Constant 397 Reaction Rate DTG of Bitumen, TGA 207 Reclaimed Oils - Evaporation Loss 370 - Index Numbers 367 f - Oxidation Stability 365 - Oxidation Start Temperature 369, 372 ff - TGA 367 Refinery Residues 111 ff - Characterization 114 ff - Conclusions 181 ff - Derived Index Numbers 136 - Distillable Fraction, TGA 132
514
Index
DSC 167 DTG 133 - Residue 800°C 132 - Simulated Distillation Curves 138 ff - Simulated Distillation, TGA 137 f - Structural Group Analysis 116 ff - TGA 134 - TGAKCR Correlation 135 - TGA in Inert Atmosphere 123 ff Repeatability, TGA 119 Residue of Asphaltenes, TGA 216 Retorting Residues, TGA 326 Rotating Flask Aging Test 188, 267 -
-
SAE Specification Single Grade Oils 350 Sampling rates 492 SEBS Copolymerisate, Isothermal Thermogravimetry 48 Secondary Peak 60 Semiblown Bitumen 187 Shale Oil 321 ff Silicone Oils 376 ff - Aging Viscosity 389 ff - Aging, TGA 383 ff - Cross-Linking 384 - DSC Oxidation 395 ff - Index Numbers, TGA 382, 386 - Molecule Size 384 - NMR Analysis 379 - Oxidation Stability 398 f - Oxidation Start Time 390 - Oxidation, TGA 387 ff - Physical Data 378 - Vaporization Loss 380 f Siloxanes 377 Simulated Atmospheric Residue ( S A R ) 144,183 Simulated Distillation - Calibration 28 ff - Gas Chromatography 28 - Heavy Crudes, TGA 106 ff - of Bitumen, TGA 138 ff - of Refinery Residues, TGA 137 f, 182 - Test Mixture, TGA 36 ff - TGA 28 ff, 404 Simulated Distillation Curve 37 f - Calculation 143 Simulated DSC and DTG Curves, Comparison 343 Simulated Thermal Cracking of Refinery Residues, TGA 162 ff Simulated Vacuum Residue (SVR) 144, 183 Simulation 331 - of Oil Shale Pyrolysis 337
Simultaneous TGA/DTA Experiments 439 Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer, see STA 47 ff, 439, 466 ff Single Grade Oil 356 ff - Evaporation Loss in Air 356 f - Isothermal Gravimetry 358 Single-Step-Model (SSM) 337 Softening Point Ring & Ball (R & B) 113 f, 187, 194 - of Bitumen 205 f Software 492 - Kinetics 428, 481 STA, (Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer) 47,487 - Boiling Behavior 49 ff - Melting (Fusion) Behavior 49 ff Standard Deviations, TGA 119 Standard Heating Rate 10 Standards, DSC 11 Start Temperature of Bitumen Crachng Process, TGA 218 Start Temperature of Bitumen Oxidation Reaction 223 Statistical Evaluation 82 Statistic, Definitions 122 Steam Flooding 400 Structural Group Analysis 114, 160 - Refinery Residues 116 ff Styrene-Butadiene Sequence Copolymers (SBS) 265 Sulphur Compounds, Stability 485 Synthetic Lubricants - Evaporation Loss 371 - Index Numbers 368 f - Physical Data 366 - TGA 368 f Synthetic Lubrication Oils - Oxidation Stability 365 Synthetic Oils - Oxidation Start Temperature 369, 372 ff System Pressure 400 Temperature Calibration 3 Temperature Ranges in Petroleum Processing 1 Temperature Statistics, n-Alkanes 21 Temperature-Programmed Thermogravimetry 288 Tertiary Oil Recovery 400 Test Mixture 23 TGA (Thermogravimetry) 1, 3 - Coefficient of Variation 119 - Curve 123 - Derived Index Numbers 98 - Deviations (Tolerances) 119
Index
German Crudes 101 f, 10.5ff Heavy Crudes 104 ff - Heavy Residues 296 ff - in Air, Refinery Residue 147 ff - in Inert Atmosphere 15 ff -- Refinery Residues 123 ff - Index Numbers 98, 119 -- in Air, PMB 273 f -- in Argon, PMB 272 -- in Argon, Refinery Residues 130 f -- Tolerances 123 - Isothermal 45 - Isothermal Aging 225 ff - Kinetics 90ff -- of Oil Shale 329 ff - Mean Value 119 - of Bitumen 202 ff, 258 ff -- Constant Temperature 260 -- in Air 217 ff - of Refinery Residue in Air 147 - of Vacuum Residue 297 - OilShale323 - Oxidation 38 ff -- DTG Distillation 157 -- End Temperature 157 -- of Refinery Residue 147 ff, 158 f -- Start Temperature 155 - Polymers 289 ff - Refinery Residues 134 - Repeatability 119 - Simulated Distillation 28 ff - Standard Deviation 119 TGAICCR Correlation, Refinery Residues 135 Thermal Behavior of Model Mixtures 23 f Thermal Refining 97 Thermo Microbalance 490 Thermoanalysis, Analytical Data Correlation to 186f Thermoanalytical Investigations, Bitumen 195 Thermobalance 6 - Calibration 3 ff - Diagram 7 Thermogravimetry, see TGA 1 - Oxidation Tests 38 ff - Pyrolysis, First Order Reaction 333 Thermomechanical Analysis (TMA) 486 Tolerances, TGA 119 -
-
515
Total Colloids in Bitumens 213 Trimethylol Propane Ester (TMP) 365 Two-Step-Model (TSM) 337 Vacuum Distillates - DSC Oxidation 361 f - Element Analysis 351 - Evaporation Loss in Air 357 - Structure Group Analysis 3.51 - TGA 354 - Vaporization Start Temperature 3.51 Vacuum Residues, see VR 112, 146, 304 Vaporization Loss of Silicone Oils 380 Vaporization of Refinery Residues 168 Vaporization Start Temperature of Bitumen, TGA 211 f Venezuelan Crudes 108 f, 128 Vertical Thermobalance 489 Virgin Oils - Evaporation Loss 370 - Index Numbers 367 f - Oxidation Stability 36.5 - Oxidation Start Temperature 369, 372 ff - TGA 367, 382, 386 Virgin Polysiloxanes, TGA 381 Visbreaker Residue, see VVR 304 Viscoelastic Behavior 486 Viscosity - Equation 392 - Improver 350, 3.55, 360, 363 - Refinery Residues 113 ff - Time Function 392 VR (Vacuum Residues) 112, 146, 304 - Analysis 297, 30.5 - Hydropyrolysis 306 ff - Index Numbers 297 - TGA 148f VVR (Visbreaker Residue) 304 - Analysis 305 - Hydropyrolysis 306 ff - TGA 1.52 Water-cooled Furnance, Cross-Section 8 Waxy Distillate, TGA 153 Weight Calibration 3 Weight Loss 35 f Weight Loss Rate 34 ff, 133