The Philosophy and Religion of Sri Caitanya (The Philosophical background of the Hare Krishna Movement)

m?hiloso~hv and Religion The

&

p

Sri e;ifanya U.U.L.

,

KAPOOR I

This is.a comprehensive, critical and If

,

comparative study of all aspects of the philosophy and religion of Sri Caitanya. In the first three chapters the history of the . Va@navareligion is traced fkom the earliest Vedic period to preCaitanya Vaisnavism in Bengal and some controvkies regarding the life of Sri Caitanya and the SampradSya or the sect to which he belongs are set at rest. In the succeeding chapters the problems of philosophy and religion are discussed in detail. It is shown how Sri Caitanya breathes a new spirit into philosophy and religion by transcending the narrow and mutually conflicting 'isms' and dogmas and reconciling them in a higher synthesis - ... by mews of the concept of the absolute as Bhagaviin and the doctrine of Acintyabhediibheda or inconceivable identityindifference. The importance of bhakti as.the exclusive means of attaining God is His highest and sweetest form is stressed. Benu or divine love is distinguished from eroticism and established as the highest t end. The doctrine of msa or transcendental relish is explained and Paralciyii rma is established as the highest

Dr. O.B.L. Kapoor was born in 1909. After taking the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy from the University of p Allahabad in 1938, he worked in various capacities as Research Fellow, Indian Institute of Philosophy, Amalner, D.Litt. Scholar, University of AUahabad, Professor and Head of the Deptt. of Philosophy, B.R i College, Agra, Principal, Govt. College, Gyanpur (Varanasi)/Rampur. Since his retirement in 1967 he has been living in : Vrindavan and writing books on subjects relating mainly to religion and philosophy. He has more than twenty-fivegworksto his 1 credit, including T k Saints of Vraja, which has been widely acclaimed throughout the ,., . West, and Thc Lije of love, now under print

*

ISBN 81-215-02'75-6 Jacket by Rathin Sengupta

v@

Sri Caitanya '

The Philosophy and Religion of Sri Caitanya .=-

(The Philosophical background of the Hare Kiishna Movement)

0.B. L. Kapoor

C

i

Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt LM

ISBN 81-215-0275-6 This edition 1994 O 1976, Kapoor, Ortde Riha1.i 1,al All Rights Reserved I'osc ROX 5715,

54 l

I

R

,

N Wl

I ill Ohh

-

- --

Contents

Abbreviations vii Preface ix Chapter I Pre-Caitanya Vaiflavism 1. Early History of Vaignavism 1 The Four Vai~navaSampradiiyas (Sects) 7 Pre-Caitanya Vaignavism in Bengal 13 Chapter I1 The life of Sri Caitanya 16 Birth and Divinity 16 The Naughty Boy 17 -* The Student 18 The Householder 19 Initiation and the Upsurge of Divine Love 20 The Leader of V a i ~ ~ a v a s22 Samkirtana 23 SamnyBsa 24 Journey to Puri and the Conversion of S~rvabhauma 25 Travel in South India and the Meeting with RSimSnanda 26 The Conversion of Pratiiparudra 28 Pilgrimage to Vrndiivana 29 The Last Days in Puri and the Mysterious Passing Away 33 Chapter I11 The Sav?pradiiya of SriCaitanya 36 Affiliation with Miidhva 36 Affiliation with Samkara 46 Chapter IV Materials for the Philosophy of Sri Caitanya 53 The Works of the Six Gosvgmins 54 The Biographies 57 Chapter V Sources of Knowledge 63 Vaidusa Pratyaksa (Mystical Cognition) 65 Sabda (Revelation) 70 grimad- bhiigavata 72 Chapter V1 Nature of the Absolute 76 The NirviSega (Unqualified) Brahman 76 The Absolute as both SaviSega (Qualified) and NirviSega (Unqualificd) 113 t

*

e

#

>

*

#

THE PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGION OF SRI CAITANYA

vi

.

The Inconceivable Power of Brahman to Reconcile the Irreconcilable 85 90 Cha~ter\~II The Concept of the Absolute as Bhagaviin Brahman, Paramatman and Bhagavln 91 The Saktis o f Bhagaviin 95 Chapter V111 Bhagavnn K r ~ n a 101 The Infinite Partial Manifestation of K f ~ n a I01 The Dhiiman (Celestial Abode) of Krgna 107 The Parikaras (Retinue) of Kfgna I13 The Lil8 ( Beatific Sports) of Krgpa 1I5 Krena as Rasa 117 The Mldhurya (Sweetness) o f Sri Kr~ga 123 The Manner and Purpose of Krgna's Appearance on Earth 126 Chapter IX Jiva-The Finite Self 132 Mukti-Freedom from Bondage 136 The Ultimate End 139 Chapter X The Phenomenal World 142 The Doctrine of MZyB 142 The Process of Creation 144 Sakti-~ariniimaviida 145 . Chapter XI The Doctrine of Acintya-bheddbheda ' 150 Acintya-bhedsbheda and the Advaita Vediinta of Samkara 158 Acintya-bhediibheda and ViSigtiidvaita of Riimiinuja l63 Acintya-bhediibheda and Sviibhlvika-bhediibheda of Nimbgrka I66 Acintya-bhediibheda and Bhedaviida of Miidhva 169 Acintya-bhediibheda and ~uddhldvaitaof Vallabhiic2rya 172 Chapter XI1 Bhakti, the Means 176 Bhakti, Jniina, Karman and Yoga 177 The Nature (Svariipa-lak~ana)of Bhakti 180 The Effects of Bhakti 184 Siidhana-Bhakti 187 Ritualistic (Vaidhi) and Spontaneous (Rggiinuga Bhakti) 194 Chapter XI11 Priti, the End 199 Stages in the Development of Priti 201 Higher Stages in Priti 203 Sthiiyi BhEva (Basic Emotions) 211 Chapter XIV Rasa or Transcendental Relish 213 Madhura-rasa and Eroticism 216 Parakiya Rasa 221 Select Bibliography 23 1 Index 237 1

L

F

+

4*

t

L

Abbreviations

CC C .Bh. Bh.. Br.S. S.Bh. G.Bh.

S

Par.S. KS BS Pr.S.

6s Br.Bh.

Caitanya-caritfimyta by Krsna . . . Dgs Kaviraj Caitanya-bhiguvata by VrndSlvan DBs* Bhcigavata-purdna Brahma-sii t ra. San?kara-bhcFya Govinda-bhd~yaby Baladeva Vidyiibhii~apa Siddhdn ta-ratna by Baladeva Vidy Bbhii~ana Tat t va-sarirdarbha by Jrva Gosvgmin Bhzgavat-samdarbha by Jiva Gosviimin Prrramdtma-satklarbha by Jiva Gosviimin Kr~na-samdarbhaby Jiva Gosviimin Bhakti-samdarbha by Jiva Gosviimin Priti-samdarbha by Jiva Gosviimin Sarva-saritvrSdinr' by Jiva Gosviimin Byhad&bhdgavafimrtaby Saniitana Oosviimio

*Rcf@erences are 1 0 the cc-lition by Radlra Gnvinda Nath, in which the Sanskrit Slokaa rllti (}]L. / ~ c . l ~ g a lvcrws j arc scp;i~-alcIyr l u t ~ ~ b c ~ cWIlcrc tl. i.cSc~.enccis to a Slaka this i g i l l d i ~ i l t ~by d t Itc !c t ccr which prcccdcs t l ~ cnumbcr. I

i

1

V

Preface

Whether we judge the intensity of a devotee's love for God by the frantic outbursts of emotion that reveal the inner working of his heart; whether we measure him by the range and depth of his spiritual realisation and the height of bliss perpetually experienced by h i m ; or, whether we apply to him the test of shaping the minds and moulding the lives of his associates Sri Caitan:.a and followers by the magnetic influence of his stands out as the brightest luminary of divine love r?n the spiritual firmament of the world. His bountiful distribution of the nectar of divine love to the rich and the poor, the young and the old, the good and the wicked, regardless of any barriers of caste and creed; his congregational chantings of the r ame of Lord, in which lakhs and lakhs of men joined at a time; his triumphs of love over his enemies; and the chastening effect of the mere touch and pressilce of his personality, which turned the kings and the chiefs into ascetics and the cruelest and the most hardened of sinners into saints, and made even the fiercest of animals dance wit11 the joy of divine love, are all unparalleled i n history. The intensely devotional character of the personality of Sri Caitany a,. however, has eclipsed his philosophy. His place has been among the devotees and the mystics rather than among the philosophers. But the devotional side of his personality itself suggests a corresponding philosophical side of his nature-a definite and perfect sense of Reality, which must account for the particular way in which his heart and soul reacted to it. It is a mistake to suppose that the predominance of emotions in the life of a devotee renders him incapable of serious philosophical thinking. On the contrary, his understanding is so developed and purified that his grasp of things is more intuitive than ratiociilative and his knowledge of reality is more intimate and complete. His emotions are the natural outcome of his close apprehension of Reality. It is not necessary for a devotee, who is in direct and intimate touch with reality, to supplement his knowledge by undergoing training in one of the acci-edited schools of learning. But Sri Caitanya had the additional advantage of high scholarship, which enabled him to express his thoughts with the precision, accuracy and consistency that characterise a system of philosophy. It is true that he did not himself write :my pl~ilosophic~al t rcatise, but he imparted philosophical teachings to his 41 isciples, W hose learned works are based on them.

X

THE PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGION OF SRI CAITANYA

It will be our endeavour in thc present work to set forth in a systematic manner the philosophical and religious doctrine of Sri Caitanyn on the basis of his utterances, as contained in his biographies, sonlc of which give an elaborate and authoritative a c c o u ~ ~oft his teachings to Rupa, Saniitana and others, and some of the important works of his followers, which were written under his express command and according to the guide-lines proviiied by him. The author is fully conscious of his responsibility in formulating the philosophy of Sri Caitanya and the necessity of approaching the subject with an unbiased mind. The fact that he has sometimes argued as Sri Caitanya himself would, in defence of his position, need not suggest that he has a sectarian outlook. He has only endeavoured by sympathetic understanding to enter deep into the spirit of his philosophy and represent it as accurately as possible. If he appears at times to own views, which are identical with those of Sri Caitanya, it is only because of the non-sectarian and all-embracing character of his philosophy, which transcends all sectarian and mutually conflicting views and reconciles them in a higher synthesis. The author is grateful to His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupad, the Founder-Acarya of The International k k t y for Krishna Consciousness and the pioneer of what is popularly known as the 'HareKrishna-Movement,' far going through the type-script and promising, in token of his deep appreciation of the work, the participation of over hundred centres of ISKCON outside India h any scheme for its distribution abroad. O.B.L. Kapoor Vrind avan October 5, 1976.

I

1

4 .

-*

1

I 1 1

CHAPTER I

Pre-Caitanya Vaisnavism .

Early history of Vai;navism It is easy to show that Vaignavism is at least as old as the Rgveda. The essential features of Vai~qBvismare the recognition of Visnu as the sole God and adoption of Bhakti or emotional service of love and devotion as a means of spiritual realization. There are clear indications of V i g u worship in the Rgveda, but Visnu, . . in the earlier Vedic period, is only one of the many gods to whom homage is paid. There are Indra, Varuna Agni, Mitra, and a list of others. They are regarded as deities underlying the different forces of nature, such as rain, wind, and fire, on which human life and prosperity depend. Each one of them is extolled as the greatest of all the gods when a hymn of praise is addressed to him. The largest number of hymns are, however, addressed to Indra, and there seems no doubt that he was universally acclaimed as the king of gods. But the philosophic spirit of the time was in search of a supreme, all pervading, and eternal Being. Indra did not. answer the need, because he was never regarded as imperishable. So Vi~nu,literally meaning the all-pervading one, naturally came to be regarded as the greatest of all the gods. He is well known for taking three strides, with which he crosses the universe.' The three strides undoubtedly represent V i ~ n uas the moving spirit behind the universe, which preserves itsby maintaining fixed laws.2 He is, therefore, called ritasya garbham or the germ of Rita, the basic law by which the whole world is regulatedS3In course of time, Indra is completely eclipsed by Visnu. .. The Vi~nusziktasshow how the greatness of Indra is transferred to Visnu. . . Vi~nu's abode is regarded as the highest place (pamm pada), in which men seeking after God delight.* In later Vedic literature, V i ~ n uis spoken of as the personification of ~acrifice,~ and the guardian of diksii or initiationO6Yamuniiciirya, in his MahcSpurusanirpaya, proves that Visnu . is the Mahiipuruga of the Puruiasakta, which is the 'essence of the Vedas.' Scholars generally are of the opinon that in the later Vedic and Brahmanic period, Vivnu's supremacy over the gods was completely established, 'Ugveda, 1, 22, 17. %id, 1, 155, S.

'ibid, I, 22, 18.

i d , I, 154, 4. l

6 S t r t t ~ p ( r t h t r t ~ m h ~part n ~ t lI, ~ ,9, 3, 9. a Auurryu

ilruhnrn!ru, l, 4. 4

&

SA

i

is-

-

a

t

* -

2

THE PHILOSOPIIY AND RELIGlON OF SRI CAITANYA

.

but there are some who refuse to admit that this implies the prevalence of Vaisnavism during this period. Thus, Dr. Hemchandra ~aychaudhuri remarks, "Although Visnu . . came to be looked upon by some as the most excellent of the gods, he was even now far from being regarded by any section of the Aryan people as the One God. . . There is very little inner connection between Vedic and Briihmanic Visnu-worship and the Bhakti religion we call Vaisnavism. .. The idea of a God of Grace, the doctrine of Bhakti-these are the fundamental tenets of the religion termed Vai~navism. But they are not very conspicuous in Vedic and Briihma~icVisnuworship. Visnu in the BrBhmanic texts is more intimately connected with Yajana (sacrifice) than with Bhakti or Prasad."l While it may be true that Vai~navisrnin its present form was not conspicuous in the Vedic age, there seems little doubt that the seeds of ~aisnavismwere sown at this time. Vi$nu was not only regarded as the supreme God but as the one God. The Vedas unequivocally declare, "There is but one reality, whom the wise men call by different names: Agni, Yama- MiltariS~A."~ Polytheism by this time had developed through henotheism to monotheism and the monotheism of the later Vedic period centred around Vi~nu.Monotheism, or belief in one God, who is all powerful and endowed with all the auspicious qualities, who can grant all the prayers of the devotee, and upon whom they can fully depend, necessarily implied faith or iraddhii, which is the first step in bhakti. graddhd was recognized as the essence of the Vedic religion which mainly consisted in sacrifice.3 It was the mother of the world of rites, while Manu was its father-jraddha' mbtG rnanuh pitti.4 The essence of the Vedic religion did not lie in rituals, though their importance was great. As Dr. B. K. G. Shastri remarks, "It lay in Upasand or Bhajana expressed in namasktira, vandand, sevd? arcand and the like, all performed m course of or along with stutis or laudatory hymns. Fundamentally it was iraddhd which disclosed a genuine spirit of worship in the sacrifice. When the votary prostrated himself before the God, sang His greatness and glories, consecrated himself to his service, or adored the God with all the marks of respect due to him, he certainly breathed an air of religious purity. When, as.the basis of all this, he put implicit faith in him and threw himself on his mercy, he could not but be on a high plane of Spirituality. Of course, in the Vedic religion, this iraddh8 bhakti was in connection with the prescribed rituals. All the same they referred to the discharge of the worshipper's duties with a clear head and a clear heart. He placed his reliance upon his God and submissively prayed to him to come to his help in his difficultie~."~ Dr. Seal also remarks, "The Vedic hymns are replete

.

'Hemchandra Raychaudhuri, The Early History of Vaigtava Sect, pp. 17-18. Vgveda, I, 164,46. 'ibid, X, 151. 'Sdmaveda, I, l , 9. 'B. K. G. Shastri, The Bhakti Cult in Ancient India, pp. 3-4.

PRE-CAITANYA VAISNAVISM

4

3

with sentiments of piety and reverence (bhakti and iraddh6) in the worship of t-he'gods . . ;The Upfisunti Ktiridds of Krupyakas and UpnnQads lay the foundations of the Bhakti Mdrga, way of Devotion or faith."l The hymns addressed to Varuna are particularly replete with devotional sentiments. Referring to this deity Dr. Keith says, "The simple worship of that deity with its consciousness of sin and trust in the divine forgiveness is doubtless one of the first roots of Bltakti."" Dr. Shastri thinks that it was under the wholesome influence of iraddlz6blmkti that the Vedic religion progressed from polytheism to monotheism, for bhakfi essentially stands for a broad, comprehensive faith in one who is adoredb3To our mind, belief in one God and Bhakti imply each other. TO argue for the one is to argue for the other. Belief in one God automatically brings about the devotional attitude of respectful dependence upon Him, while Sraddhii or Bhakti necessarily enlarges our conception of Divinity. The more Sraddhii develops, the greater are the demands made upon. the greatness and benevolence of the god of worship, who gradually comes to be regarded as the greatest. Exclusive devotion to a God gives rise to our belief in Him as the One God without a second. At the same time, belief in One God gives rise to the attitude of exclusive dependence upon Him. Prof. Garbe, in his translation of the Bhagavadgitci, remarks that a monotheistic religion in which the object of worship is looked upon as a kindly deity ,naturally begets the feeling of Bhakti in the hearts of devotees.' The Bhakti religion, also called the Bhiigavata-siitvata, Ekantika or Paficaratra religion, first appears in a distinct form in the Niirsyaniya section of ~ i i n t i ~ a r vand a the Visnopiikhyiina of the Bhiynaparva of the Mahiibhdrata. It is declared to have been first taught by Krsna-Vgsudeva .. to Arjuna before the commencement of the ~ u r u - ~ i i n d a vwar. a Its origin from Krsna-Vgsudeva is further confirmed by the name Siitvata5 religion applied to it, since Satvata was another name of the V r ~ n race i to which Krs~a-VBsudeva belonged? The followers of this religion were, for the same reason, called Satvatas. Bhandarkar thinks that Vrisudeva and Krsna . . . were originally two distinct persons. VSisudeva was the name of the Sgtvata prince already referred to, while Krsna was the name of an ancient holy seer, who,later on, came to be identified with VZisudevae6But Keith7 and Raycha~dhuri,~ think that it is impossible to justify this view in the face of all the different available evidences, Hindu, Buddhist and Greek. In PBt~iijali's Mahdbhdfya

.

'Seal, Cot~rporatlveStudies In V ~ i ~ ~ ~ aand v i sCl~ristianity, m p. 5. 'Jortrnal of Royal A siatic Society, 1 915 , p. 834. 'Malidbhcirata, XI I , 335, 19. 'ibid. p. 9. 'pp. 29 ff. r k a , Vhlflnvisnr, S[rivi.~m nnd Minor Rcligk~usSystems, pp. 8-9. 7 .louv/rrtl t / H t ) , ) ~ ~/Isic*trtic tl Society of Crcat llritctin, p. 840. 'ihit!, p. 36. , @

--

il

. i

d -

4

-

i

*

-

a

-

.

a-

l.

&.-~&a

.

A

*

-

*

-

(commentary on the SCltras of Papinr), the slayer of Kansa is referred to a6 Vasudeva at one place dnd Kdv~aat another. Bhandarkar argues that in Kielhorn's edition of the Mahcfbha,~ya,which is more accurate than the Benaras edition, "Vilsudeva is used four times and K r ~ p aonly once."' Raychaudhuri replies to this: "From no manuscript is the name Krvna entirely absent. The frequency of the name 'Vgsudeva' may be due to the fact, which he himself proved, that it was the proper name, while 'Krvna' was the Gotra narneaw2Further, the name Kgna, as the son of Devakr and the pupil of Ghora Angiras, occurs in the Chdndogya Upani~ad,and, as Raychaudhuri points out, "here Krsna .. learns the same doctrines-iapodinami?$anam ahimsa' satyavacanam-which Viisudeva teaches in the Gits 8-4 In his own time, Vgsudeva-K~sna,the founder of the BhTigavata religion, is identified with Bhiigavata Himself. Bhiigavata represents the Satvatas as practising the devotional worship of the Supreme God VZisudeva, and Vilsudeva is no other than Vi~nu.It may here be noted that the process of Viqnu's gradual rise in divinity, which started in the Vedic period, continues till it is completed in every respect in the Paur8nic period. The Pauranic literature is full of stories of Visnu's ascendency as the supreme God. There are stories of Indra being defeated by V i ~ n uand deprived by him of all the good things he possessed. Prominent among these is the story of Visnu's winning over Sri or Laksmi, the goddess of fortune, from Indra. When the supremacy of Visnu is thus fully established, He is iden. . . as is manifested from numerous evidences in the tified with VSisudeva-Krsna, Mahnbhdrata.6 The identification is philosophically justified, since "Wgnu' and 'VSisudeva' are very much similar in meaning. We have already noted that Visnu . . means that which pervades the whole universe. The meaning of Viisudeva is thus explained in the Mahibhdrata: ChBdayivi jagad vis'vatp bhatvcr siirya ivdmjubhih SurvabhiitcSdhivdsaica ~dsudevi~tatoh~aham. . "Assuming the form of the sun I cover the universe with my rays and, because I am the home of all creatures, I am called by the name Vgsudeva." The date of Mahdbhdrata, however, is not certain. It can not, therefore, help us in assigning any date to the earliest existence of the Bhagavata religion. The next dependable source is the epigraphic records. The inscriptions found at Ghosundi iu Rajputana and at Besnagar7 show that Bhiigavatas were the worshippers of Vlisudeva and that the Bhiigavata religion prevailed in the northern part of India and was adopted even by the Greeks8 in the earlier part of the second century BC. 8

'ibid, p. 37. $XVI, 1-2. 'ibid, p. 39, Thapters 65 and 66 of the Bh&~maparvaand Chapter 43 of Sdntiparva. 6Mahdbhdrata,-XII, 348.6-8. 'Bhandarkar, op. cit., p. 3. 8ibid.

lVai~!zavismetc. p., 10.

I

4

i

I

. .

t

1

S'

\

5

PRE-CAITANYA VAI$WAVISM

A reference to Viisudeva is found 'in Piinini, IV, 3,98. Commenting upon this Stitra, PBtSiijali states VBsudeva is the name of the 'worshipful' or God. Bohtlingk, Macdonel1,l Keith and many other western scholars place Piiqini in the fourth century BC. Bhandarkar thinks that Plnini must have flourished in the seventh century BC. or earlier still. Dr. Raychaudhuri considers at length the possible evidences that are available and concludes that PSinini "in all probability lived after the Persian conquest of Gandhiira in the later half of the sixth century BC. With a date in the fifth century BC all the evidence accomodates it~elf."~ It is, therefore, certain that the Bhiigavata religion is at least older than the fifth century~c. An important landmark in the development of the Bhagavata religion is the emergence of the Paficarltra system3 with its doctrine of Vylihas, which, according to Bhandarkar, must have taken place in about the third century B C , ~ and according to Raychaudhuri, in the first century BC.= The Paiicariitra literature was generally known as Paiicarcitra Kgama and comprised 108 Samhitii~.~ Principal among these are Pauikdra, VZriiha, Brtfhma, Sdttvata, Jaya, Ahirbudhanya, Parameivara, Sanatkumdra, Parama, Padmodbhava, Mahendra, Kagva, Padma, and &ara Samhitas. The BhBgavatas came to regard them as superior to the Vedas in the sense that they were the teachings of Viisudeva or Ngriiyana to Nara and a number of teachers such as Siindilya, PrahlSda and Sugriva. Like all other philosophical literature of India, the Bhakti philosophy contained in these works was, in course of time, reduced into stltra forms in the well known Bhakti Sutras of hndilya and Niirada. The development of the Bhagavata literature, both in its general or Pauriinika aspect and technical or Paiicariitrika aspect, is intimately connected with the Gupta period. The rulers of the Gupta period were great champions of the Bhiigavata religion. They called themselves Paramabhagavatas and, due to their efforts, Bhiigavatism spread throughout thelength and breadth of the Indian sub-continent. An important feature of the Vaispavism of this period is that the doctrine of incarnation, which is already fully developed as a logical outcome of the doctrine of grace, is emphasised to the extent of eliminating the independent worship of the Vyiihas. V i ~ n uis again the supreme God. 'Sanskrit Literature, p. 17. Raychaudhuri, The Early History of the Vaisnava Sect, pp. 29-30. 'The Paficariitra system is strongly denounced in some Puriinas as non-Vedic. but some other Puriinas, such as the Mahdbhdrata, the Bhigavata and the Vi,v!~upurcina are wholly in favour of it. This may be due to the distinction between Vedic and nonVedic PaAcarBtra, mentioned by Dr. Majumdar on the basis of Viramitroduyu, a work, writ ten in the 17th century (Caitanya: His Lifo and Doctrine, p. 27). 'Bhmdlrkar, op. cit., p. 39. mKaycl~iiudhuri, op. cit., p. 176. I'he tlutllber is ut lcuvt 224 recording to Dr. 0 t h Schrader. Sce hi8 introduction to A hlrbudhanya Strrilltitd. 0

I

,

6

,

THE PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGION OF SRI CAITANYA

. I

Though K l ~ v ais regarded as identical with Vivnu, the former is only the most perfect incarnation of the latter. Another important feature of the Guptan Vai~navismis that the influence of Yoga and Siimkhya, which is already apparent in the Gita and the N~raya-niya,becomes more pronounced. The influence of the Siimkhya doctrine of P u r u ~ aand Praklti is noticed in the installation of Lak~mibeside Niiriiyana. With the fall of the Guptas the Bhiigavata religion lost its supremacy in northern India. But the centre of gravity shifted to the South, where it flourished under the patronage of the ~lviiras,the great Tarnil saints, who mainly preached Kgna worship and Bhakti. Twelve A~varas are mainly mentioned: 1. Poygai or Poykai A~viir 2. BhtitattSir Alviir 3. Pey Alviir 4. Tirumalisai Alviir 5. ~amm-Alviirof satakopa 6. Madhurkavi Alviir 7. Kulasekhar Alviir 8. ~eriy-Alviiror Vi~nucitta 9. Andal 10. Tondaradippodi A l v ~ r 1 1. Tiruppiina Alv~ir 12. 'I'irumangai Alvar Krislu~aswamiplaces all the Alviirs before the second half of the eighth cc11t ury nu.' But according to Bhandarkar, Kulasekhar probably lived in tllc f i r ~ tl ~ t i l fof the twelfth century, while the earliest of the Alvars may bc plirccd i\bout t11c fifth or the sixth centurYe2 The Alviirs composed tIlc Prtrhnntllrc~m,n collection of four thousand devotional songs in Tamil. 'l'llcy wcrc rcyurtlcd ns very sacred and were worshipped as the Vai~nava Vedn. l spccial li'aturc of the Bhrigavata religion as preached by the A I V ~was ~ S its c~ccessibilityto people of high and low castes, men and women, rich arid poor, wise and ignorant, pious and impious, alike. Among the A~varsthcmsclves, A0651 was a woman, Tiruppiina belonged .. was to the depressed class; Kulaiekhar was a king, and Tondaradippodi an abandoned sinner. The only thing necessary for realisation, according to the Alviirs, was prapatti or self-surrender. Dhyana and Yoga were neither necessary nor within easy reach of the common man. The songs of the Alviirs have been a great source of inspiration to Vaisnavas throughout south India. They, may, according to some scholars, have influenced Vai~navismin the north as well, since the basic emotions of d&ya (servant's love for his master), sakhya (friendly love), 'Indian Antiquary, XXXV, p. 228.

7

PRE-CAITANYA VAI SWAVISM

va'tsalya (mother's love for her child) and rnddhwya (woman's love for her beloved), which unuerlie them are also associated with the north Indian Vai~navism. After the AIVPES came the Aciiryas,' a group of teachers, who represented the intellectual side -of Tamilian Vaisnavism. They supplemented the doctrine of Bhakti, which alone was stressed by the Alviirs, with Jnana and Karma. They were called Ubhayavedantins, because they reconciled the Tamil Prabandha with the Prasthctnatraya, i.e. the Vedas, the Upani$ads and the Gitd. The first Aciirya was Niithamuni or Ranganiith Muni, who lived in hirangam near Trichinopoly and died about 920 AD. He was an erudite scholar and a passionate lover of the songs of the Alvars. He rediscovered the Prabandha and popularised it. He also instituted a festival of which the special feature was the recitation of Prabhandha in the hirangam temple for three weeksm2He wrote two important works, the Yogarahasya and the NyCyatattva, of which the former is now lost. To him goes the credit of first giving a systematic shape to the doctrine of prapatti, which later became the central docrine of Sri Vai~navism.

The four Vai~navaSampradiyas (Sects) Sri Vaisnavism .. is the first of the four traditional Vaisnava Sampradiiyiyas, Sri, Hamsa, Brahma, and Rudra, which now rose into prominence, one after the other. Each one of these claims divine and the most ancient origin, but is associated with the name of an Aciirya, who at a much later time, re-established it by systematising its doctrine and re-interpreting the Brahmasiitra in the light of the same, and who, in this sense, is regarded as its founder. Sri Sampradaya was established by RPmZinuja, Hahsa by NimbBrka, Brahma by Madhva, and Rudra by Vallabha. We shall here give a brief, general account of each and discuss its philosophical position in detail, especially with regard-to the problem of relation between Brahman, the individual self and the world, at a later stage, when we compare it with Sri Caitanya's doctrine of Acintya BhedB-bheda. An account ~f the Rudra Sampradaya may not appear to be justified in our discussion of pre-Caitnaya Vaisnavism, because S r i Vallabhacarya was contemporaneous with Sri Caitanya, but we have included it, because it is also linked with Vi~pusvlmi,who lived much earlier. ~ g h l n u j a the , founder of Sri Sampradiiya, was born in 1017 AD and had a long span of life lasting upto 11 37 AD. He was originally a pupil of y~davaprakBSa,an Advita philosopher, whose teachings did not satisfy him and whom he had to leave. He came under the influence of Vaisnava .. 'The importance given to the Prcrbandha in the temple festival and the consequent ncccssily of recognising an authority who could explain its obscure passages led to the origin or the system of Ac~ryas. The function of the Aciirya WM to interpret tb Yrubondha and to dcfcnd Vaiv~avismfrom critics. '?'llc Acaryau, tl~cl~~sclves, do not claim to be the founders. . . #

-

thought wherein his main source of inspiration was the songs of the Alvirs. He renounced the world and became the Acrirya at Srirnagam. The rest of his life was dedicated to the formulation and propagation of the ViSi~tgdvaiticdoctrine. In his Vedctrtha snrizgraha he proved that the purpose of some of the principal Upani~ads,upon which Samkara had based his monistic philosophy, was not to teach Advaitism, and that the Upanigads did not uphold the impersonal Brahman, but the personal absolute who was none other than Niiriiya~a. Though Ngriiyapa is the most favoured deity of the school of RBmBnuja, VIsudeva comes into prominence when the supreme soul and its Vytihas are - mentioned., The name of Gopiilakrsna . . . is not mentioned and RBrna, also, is not a favourite deity. The most important work of Riirniinuja is the Sri Bhd;ya on the Veddnta siitras, which, once again, securely laid the foundation of Vai~navism and made it safe from the onslaughts of Advaitism. The philosophical position of Viiistadvaitavlda is styled as concrete monism. It is the non-duality of the Absolute, qualified by Jiva and Praklti as its body and modes or attributes. It accepts ParinBmavlda. Brahman is both the material and efficient cause of the world. Before creation, Jiva and Praklti exist in a subtle form, but when creation takes place, they develop in their present form. Thus, Brahman as the Absolute, including Jiva and Prakgti as moments in its being, is the material cause of the world, while Brahman as the inward controlling spirit, which wills to create, is its efficient cause. Brahman is immanent as well as transcendent. In the immanent aspect, it is the cosmological principle expressing itself in the lilii-vibhiiti; in the transcendent aspect it is Brahman-&itself, expressing itself in Nityavibhfiti. Jiva is Brahman in the sense that it has all the qualities of Brahman, except all-pervasiveness, and the power of controlling the world. It can attain salvation by devotion to Viisudeva9 . which arises from dhruva smytih or steady remembrance. After the death of Riimgnuja the Sri vaiseavas were divided into two sects the Vacjkalais and the Tenkalais. The Vadkalais think that salvation can be attained more easily through the Sanskrit holy works-the Vedas the Upnigads, and the GitSi, while the Tenkalais think that it can be attained more easily through the Tamil Prabandha. Both the schools recognize the necessity of praputti. But the Vadkalais emphasise that prapatti is tioned by Karma or selfieffort: it is -only when the soul makes efforts and these do not bring forth the desired result that the frame of mind necessary for prapatti is produced. The Tenkalais, on the other hand, insist that God's grace is spontaneous and not conditioned by any effort . on the part of the devotee. While Vai~navismwas thus developing in the south there was a great upheaval against Advaitism and its doctrine of May2 or Illusion pioneered by Nimbarka in the north. The exact date of Nimblrka's birth is not known but it is believed that he lived some time after Rlmiinuja. Ha was a S

PRE-CAITANYA VAI$NAVISM

Tailanga ~kiihrnanaby. birth but lived in V~ndavananear MathurB. He wrote a commentary on the Bruhrna siitras which is known as Vedantapdrijtitasaurabha and a small treatise called Dasailoki (also Siddhtintaratna), because it consists of ten Slokas describing the essentials of his system. There is a commentary on Veddntapdrijctasaurabha by NimbBrk's imme, a commentary on DasaSIoki by Haridiate successor, ~ r i n i v ~ s aand vyiisadeva, who is the thirty-second in the disciplic line from Nimbiirka. Nimblrka's philosophical position is known as Dvaita-advaita or Bhediibhoda. The categories of existence, according to him, are three, i.e., Cit, Acit and Wvara. Cit and Acit are different from I~vara,in the sense that they have attributes and capacities, which are different from those of I~vara.I ~ v a r ais independent and exists by Himself, while Cit and Acit have an existence dependent upon Him. At the same time Cit and Acit , they cannot exist independently of are not different from i ~ v a r a because Him. Difference means a kind of existence which is separate but dependent, while non-difference means impossibility of independent existence. Thus Nimbarka equally emphasises both difference and non-difference, as against RlmBnuja, who makes difference subordinate to non-difference, in as much as, for him, Cit and Acit do not exist separately from Brahman, but as its body or attributes. Nimbiirka accepts Rrimanuja's Pariniimaviida theory of creation, but not in exactly the same sense. For Riimiinuja, the animate and the inanimate worlds are the result of the development of subtle forms of these, which constitute the body of Brahman. For Nimbiirka, the rudiments from which the two worlds develop do not form the body of Brahman, but exist in a subtle form in the various capacities which belong to Brahman in its natural condition. Brahman is the material cause of the universe in the sense that Brahman brings the subtle rudiments into the gross form by realizing these capacities. The most important point of difference between RZimiinuja and Nimbarka is that, while the former advocates the worship of Ngriiyana with His consorts (hksmi, Bha and Lilii), for Nimbarka, the highest object of worship is K q3;ga and his consort Riidhii, attended by thousands of Gopis, or cowhertlcsses, of the celestial Vpdiivana. Devotion , accordirlg to Nimbiirka, consists in prapatti, or self-surrender, rather than in upasand or meditation in the Upani~adicsense prescribed by RBmiinuja. We have for the first time.alluded to the worship of the cowherd K r s ~ a ~ 1 1 dKiidhii, which may, therefore, appear to be a comparatively new eleinent in the Bhagavat a religion. Bhandarkar thus expresses himself on (he point: "The inscriptions, the work of Piitaiijali and even the Ngriiyaniya itself . i~ltl~cute no knowledge of the existence of such a god. In the last the Avat .,I a of Vasudevu is mentioned as having been assumed for the destruction 01' K ~ r i ~ s abut , of none of the demons whom the cowherd K r ~ n akilled in tko cow-6cttlamont (Gokula). The cotltrast between thir and the statements +

l

10

THE PHILOSOPHY AND KELIGILA~OF

SRI CAITANYA

in the Hariva~hSa,(vv. 5876-5b78), Vdytrpur6!ia, chapter 98, VV. 100-102, and Blzcigavotapuri!ta, 11, 7, of Klsna Avatara having been assumed for destroying all the demons that appeared in the cow-settlemeflt as well as of Kamsa is significant. When these works were written, the legend about the cowherd K ~ s n a must have already become current and his identification with Viisudeva-Krsna . . . been effected. And the story of the Vrsni .. . prince Viisudeva having been brought up in a cow-settlement is incongruous with his later career as depicted in the Mahdbhdrata . . . "In the Sabhiiparva (Chapter 41), however, Si6up81a introducing .. alludes to his various deeds, such as the killing of Piitan8 and others, Krsna which were done in the cow-settlement, and speaks of Bhi~ma'shaving praised them. But the praise bestowed on K r ~ n aby B h i ~ m a(Chapter 38) does not contain a mention of these deeds. This passage, therefore, is interpolated."' ... Since Harivarilsa, which is the chief authority for the story of Krsna's boyhood in the Gokula, contains the word diniira, corresponding to the Latin word denarius, Bhandarkar thinks that the work must have been written about the third century of the Christian era, and the story could not have been known before the beginning of the Christian erae2He further concludes that the worship of the boy-god, the story of his birth, his father's knowledge that he was not his son, and the massacre of the innocents suggest Christian influences, which were brought to India by a tribe of Abhiras in the course of their wanderings eastward from Syria and became engrafted on the story of Vasudeva-Kgna of IndiaO3 Weberqhinks there is a gap between the K r ~ n aof Mahribhdrata and the Krsna . . . of Gokula, which can be explained only with reference to some external influence. He also suggests that the influence is Christian, since 's the solemn there is much similarity between the legends of K ~ ~ n a birth, celebration of his birthday and his life as a herdsman and the Christian legends. In support of this, he alludes to the legend of ~veta-dvipa(White Island) in the ~iintiparvaof the Mahdbhdrata, which, according to him refers to some Christian settlement. Ekata, Dvita and Trita go to the White Island to see Hari or Niiriiyapa. They perform austerities for a long time, but are told that they ean~lotsee NarSiyana, because they are not Bhaktas. They give a description of the White Island and its inhabitants, who are so different from Indians. Dr. Raychaudhuri effectively counters all suggestions of a Christian influence with regard to this element in the Bhiigavata cult: "With regard to the birth-day festival of Krsna, the representation of him as a suckling at his mother's breast, and the homage paid to the mother," he observes 99

9

L

ZBhandarkar, op. cit., pp. 35-36. 'ibid. 8ibid, pp. 37-38; also Indian Antiquary, 1912, p. 15. 'Indian Antiquary, 1871, Weber on the K r g ~ aJanmiigtam!.

k2

n

l%i

p7 i)

8 4

P

i

)'

+

that it does not suggest any Christian influence, because, "the association ()S K r ~ n awith Devaki, his mother, is as well known and is as old as the ('Iuindogya-upani~ad," and "Recent discoveries at Mohenjodaro in Sind prove that the worship of the Mother Goddess can claim a hoary i~ntiquity."The Sveta-dvipa cannot refer to a Christian settlement because gcography does not know of any quarter of the earth which lies to the 1101 th of the Ocean of Milk, and to the north-west of Mount Meru, and above it by 32,000 yojanas, where the island is said to be situated.' "AS rcgards the pastoral associations of Krsna," says Raychaudhuri, "Vi~nu the \'edit deity, with whom Krslia .. . is identified in the pre-Christian Taittiriya .i-u,,~,)aka, .is called in the egveda, which means 'protector of cows' according to Macdonell and Keith3 and 'herdsman' according to I l opkinseV4 Dhandarkar's theory is incorrect, because, "we learn from Periplus of thc Krythraean Sea that the Abhiras were already settled in western India (Abiria), in the first c e ~ ~ t u AD. r y They are also mentioned by PSitaiijali.6 Ilow could thev bring with them traditions of the birth of Christ in a stable, of the massacre of the innocents and so on?"6 There was a stronger current of the Bhakti movement in the north of' which Rgmananda was the fountainhead. H e was the pupil of Raghav;tll;lnda, a teacher of the RBiniinuja school, and lived probably from 1300 to 1400 AD. He preached the ViSi~tSidvaitic doctrine, but he subhtitiited the worship of Riima and Sltii in the place of the worship of N;i~*iiyal~a and LaksmS, and succeeded in making it popular. One of the reasons for his success was that he used the vernaculars in the prop;igation of his creed, but a more important reason was the abolition of caste within the Vaisnavas. It is true that the Vaisnavas had always tuhca a more liberal attitude towards the lower castes. RBmiinuja had Ironc to the extent of allowing the lower castes to. imitate the customs s11d habits of the Vai~navasand to study the Prabandhas. But the lower (;IS!CS were never taken into the inner fold and treated on terms of cqu;~lity.They were not allowed to read the Vedas and wear the sacred d . Rlmiinanda brought about a radical reform, making no distinct ion whatsoever between the Briihmanas and the lower castes. Many of Ilia noted followers, such as Kabrr and RaidSis, came from the depressed ~ l ; ~ s s cusually s regarded as untouchables. 'I'he most important teacher of Vai~navism was MadhvIiciirya or

.

A fnlrtlhlriirnta, Xl l,335, 8, 9. V i ~ ; l ~i sualso cellcd yriva akurrrcircrli (&veda, I, 155, 6). which Ilkc Kl'gna. I I I I ~ + vltd~ir rnnt~x,I, p. 238. ' I +//cN ( * l ~ ~ i oo/'/ ~ ,Irtiliu, o p. 57. lntliun At1 fiqirtrry, 1 9 18, p. 36, 'I4 n y c l ~ i n ~ t l l ~op, ~ r icit,, , p. 151, @

@

means cvcr young, S

12

THE PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGION OF

SRI CAITANYA

Ananda Tirtha. He was born near Udipi in 1199 'AD and is said to have lived for 79 years. The mission of his life was to refute the pure monism of Samkara as well as the qualified monism of R-ilrnsnuja and to promulgate the Dvaita school of VedBnta. He wrote commentaries on BBdrByana's siitras, Rgveda, the Upanijads and the Gitd. Madhva's philosophy is purely dualistic in character. He holds that there are five kinds of eternal and absolute difference between Brahman, Jiva and- Jana, namely, the difference between Brahman and Jiva, Brahman and Jana, Jiva and Jiva, Jiva and Jana, and Jana and Jana. He rejects the Pariniimaviida doctrine, as it does violence to the independent majesty of Brahman. Brahman exists independently, and does not undergo any change at the time o f creation. He creates the world by disturbing the equilibrium of Praklti and, like an absolute ruler, directs it by His will. He is the ground of cit and acit, which depend upon Him for their form and function. To avoid pluralism, which is the logical outcome of his doctrine of fivefold difference (paicabheda), Madhva introduces the principle of. ViSeaa (specific particulars). Being, with its manifoldness, -is an integral being, exclusive of differences, but differences, are perceived in it on account of ViSega. It is undivided though not unqualified. The undivided being admits of qualitative differences on account of ViSe~a. Madhvaites recognize the authority of the PaHcarStra Salhhitiis but do not give any place in their system to VyOhas. They identify Brahman with Visnu . . and adore Rlma and K r ~ n aas His incarnations, but do not show any inclination for the worship of Gopiila-Kr~naand Riidha. The means. of realization adopted are physical, moral and spiritual disciplines Yoga. These have Bhakti as their fruition and comprised in Astiinga . Bhakti is completed in divine grace. In 1479, about six years before the advent of Srr Caitanya, was born Vallabha, the founder of the Suddhadvaita school. He was the son of a Telugu Brahmin, and derived his Vedantic theory from Vivnusv5mi, who is said to have lived about the middle of the thirteenth century. He was the last of the four successors of Vi$nusvBmi mentioned by in his Bhaktamdla, the first three being JnBnadeva, NPmadeva and Trilocana. He lived for some time in Mathura and for some time in VpdPvana. Suddh2dvaita means pure unity of Brahman, which is free from M@@. Brahman is all and all is Brahman (Sarvam-khaluidam-bruhman). Brahman is sat-cit-enanda and Jiva and the world are not different from Him. Only Jiva is Brahman with the quality of Ananda obscured and the world is Brahman with the qualities of cit and dnanda obscured. All the objects in the world are Brahman in those forms. The relation between Brahman, Jiva and the world is that of pure identity (Advaita). Non-difference alone is real. Difference is only for the sake or sport of LrL ll'i

li

G d

34

THE PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGION OF

SRI

CAITANYA

Navadipa in October with the devotees from Bengal after their usuaJ four ITIonths stay at Puri and returned in December. This also suggests that SrI Caitanya could not have passed away in July as held by Dr. Sen. The source of Dr. Sen's inforlnation is an account given in the Caitanyanlaligala of Jayanailda, which is neither recognized by the Vai~l)avas nor' regarded ai authoritative enough by the scholars. 1 Its description of the ,. life of Sri Caitanya is based on hearsay and runs in nlany respects counter to the, accounts given by other biographers, which are generally accepted as authentic. 2 As SrI Caitanya passed away at Puri, where he also. spent the last twenty-four years of his life, the accounts given by his disciples of Orissa in regard to the latter part of his life may generally be regarded as more trustworthy tha'n those of his Bengal disciples. Turning to these we find that Acyutananda.. a contemporary of Sri Caitanya says in his Suny a Sanlhitii that after the passing away of Sri Ca itanya king PraHiparudra organized a one month festival in his honour, .beginning from Vaisakhi PflrQima. Isvaradasa, a later writer says in his Caitanya·bhtigavata (Chap. LXXV) that Sri Caitanya passed away on the third lunar day of Vaisakha. It may be difficult from these accounts to determine the exact date of the passing away of Sri Caitanya, but combining these with the accounts . given in the more authoritative biographies of his Bengal disciples we can safely conclude that he could not have passed away before February 1534 AD. The manner in which Sri Caitanya passed away is veiled with mystery. The general belief is that he disappeared physically and merged with the deity of the temple of Jagannatha, as Acyutananda, Isvaradasa and Locanadasa say, or in the deity of the temple of To~a Gopinatha in Purl, as nlentioned in Bhakti-I:atniikara. Dr. Sen, however, thinks that he died of septic fever, caused by injury to his left foot from a brick while dancing on the Rathayatra day. -He says that he was in- the Guiidica temple of Jagannatha, when he suffered from high fever. "When the priests apprehended his end to be near they shut the gate against all visitors. This they did to take time for burying him and repairing the floor' after burial. The priests opened. the gate at 11 PM and gave out that Sri Caitanya was incorporated with the image of Jagannatha."3\

IThere is no doubt that Locanadasa·s Caitanya-mangla also mentions that SrI Caitanya passed away on the seventh lunar day of Asagha. But scholars do not attach any historical importance to this work (see B. B. Majumdar, op. cit., p. 274) and it is likely that Locanadasa derives his info rmation frem Jayananda himself, as it was written in 1575 (D. C. Sen, Banga Rlta.yo' 0 Saltitya, V, 314). soon after Jayananda's Cnitanya-lnaiigaia, which was written sometime between 1560 and 1570 (B B. Majumdar, op. cit., p. 230). lB. B. Majumdar, ·op. cit., pp. 223-36. and S,K. De, OPe cit., p. 77, :'0. C. Sen, Caitanya and his age, p. 264. '