This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Published by Springer, P.O. Box 17, 3300 AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands. www.springer.com
Printed on acid-free paper
Every effort has been made to contact the copyright holders of the articles which have been reproduced from other sources. Anyone who has not been properly credited is requested to contact the publishers, so that due acknowledgement may be made in subsequent editions.
Each topical area in science has its own pioneers. Pioneers in science are typically people with unorthodox and original ideas, ideas that change our way of thinking about the world that surrounds liS . In the fields of geomechanics and geohydrology, Gerard De Josselin De Jallg is a typical example of such a pioneer. His scientific career started in t he late fi fties of the previous century, and from that time he produced a number of highly significant papers t hat contributed to the basic understanding of the aforementioned topical areas. He could achieve t hese results because of his rather unusual and unorthodox way of solving scientific problems. First, he " visualized" the problem in his mind. He always said: "I need to see a "picture" of what's going on". Then he translat ed t his virtual " picture" into a mathematical model, and subsequently tried to solve t he resulting mathematical problem. In many cases, his strategy was successful . Visualization is maybe t he key-word in De Josselin De Jong's life. Not only visualization of complex scientific problems, but also visualization of the world surrounding him: as an graphical artist. He is able to capture the real world in beautiful paintings, drawings, litho's, etchings, etc. T he real world brought back to its basics: beautiful , exciting, and maybe most important: recognizable a nd understandable. Abst ract art is not his game, neither abstract science! ' If I a m not able " see" what 's going on, I am not interested '. Almost all graphs in his scient ific papers were hand-drawn. No ruler was ever used. Looking at t hese graphs is a pleasure, almost wor ks of art. No computer graphics tool is or will ever be able to produce such eye catching a nd beautiful scientific graphs. Remarkable, but true. In this volume we present a selection of Gcrard De J ossclin De Jong's scientific papers. T he papers are reproduced in their original form: in the original format (as t hey a ppeared in the journals or reports), including typo's, errors, and misprints. The volume consists of two parts. The first part is devoted t o
v
vi
PREFACE
his scientific contributions to the topical field of soil mechanics, his main field of interest as full-professor of Soil Mechanics (Geo-technics) at Delft University of Technology. Although the subject of subsurface flow and transport processes did not belong to the chair he hold as a full-professor, he was very interested in these subjects. This interest resulted in a series of highly original papers, which are still relevant for our basic understanding of flow and transport processes in porous media. A selection of these papers can be found in the second part of this volume.
The editors, Ruud J. Schotting,Hans (C.J.) van Duijn and Arnold Verruijt
vi
Preface
2 Short Curriculum Vitae of G. de Josselin de Jong
1915 Born in Amsterdam 1934 Gymnasium-,B in Haarlem 1941 Civil Engineering degree at Delft University of Technology May 1941 - Sept. 1942 Engineer at Delft Soil Mechanics Laboratory (currently Geo Delft) Sept. 1942 Arrested by the German Navy during an attempt to escape to England Nov 1942 Sentenced to 15 years imprisonment in Germany May 1945 Liberated by English troups in the northern part of Germany 1945 - 1947 Lived in Amsterdam, main activities drawing and painting 1947 - 1949 Lived in Paris, worked with different architects and for Bureau d'Etude de Beton Precontraint Nov. 1947 Marriage with Cara Waller 1949 - 1959 Researcher at Delft Soil Mechanics Laboratory Febr. 1959 Ph.D. degree at Delft University of Technology 1959 - 1960 Visiting Research Assistant, University of California, Berkeley, USA 1960 - 1980 Full Professor of Soil Mechanics, Delft University of Technology 1980 Retirement
vii
"Jugendstil house at the Hooistraat seen from the Nieuwe Uitleg, The Hague", by G. de Josselin de Jong, 1982. Washed pen, 38cm x 27,5 cm. Property of Mrs. Lagaay-Govers. viii
Contents
1 Preface
v
2 Short Curriculum Vitae of G. de Josselin de Jong 3 Soil Mechanics 3.1 Introduction to Soil Mechanics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2 Lower bound collapse theorem and lack of normality of strain rate to yield surface for soils, Proc. IUTAM Symp. on Rheology and Soil Mechanics, Grenoble, 1964, pp 69-78 . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3 Discussion, Proc. Eur. Conf. Soil Mech. & Found. Eng., Oslo, 1968, pp 199-200 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.4 The double sliding, free rotating model for granular assemblies, G´eotechnique, 1971, pp 155-163 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.5 Photoelastic verification of a mechanical model for the flow of a granular material, A. Drescher & G. de Josselin de Jong, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1972, Vol. 20, pp 337-351 . . . . . . . . . . . 3.6 Elasto-plastic version of the double sliding model in undrained simple shear tests, G´eotechnique, Vol. 38, No. 4, 1988, pp 533-555 (+ Discussion G´eot., 39, No. 3, 1989, pp 565-566) . . . . . . . . 3.7 Improvement of the lowerbound solution for the vertical cut off in a cohesive, frictionlesssoil, G´eotechnique, Technical Notes, June 1978, pp 197-201 3.8 Application of the calculus of variations to the vertical cut off in cohesive frictionless soil, G´eotechnique,Vol. 30, No. 1, 1980, pp 1-16 3.9 A variational fallacy, G´eotechnique, Vol. 31, No. 2, 1981, pp 289-290 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.10 Consolidation around pore pressure meters, J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 24, 1953, pp 922-928 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.11 Application of stress functions to consolidation problems, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Soil Mech. & Found. Eng., London, 1957, Vol. 1, pp 320-323 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ix
vii 1 3
6 16 19
28
44.
68 73. 89 91
98
x
CONTENTS
3.12 Consolidation models consisting of an assembly of viscous elements or a cavity channel network, G´eotechnique, Vol. 18, 1968, pp 195-228 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.13 Verification of the use of peak area for the quantitative differential thermal analysis, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., Vol. 40, 1957, pp 42-49 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.14 A capacitative cell apparatus , G. de Josselin de Jong & E.C.W.A. Geuze, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Soil Mech. & Found. Eng., London, 1957, Vol. 1, pp 52-55 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.15 Etude photo-´elastique d’un empilement de disques, G. de Josselin de Jong & A. Verruijt, Cahier Groupe Fran çais de Rh´eologie, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1969, pp 73-86 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
102
136
144
148
4 Flow and Transport in Porous Media 162 4.1 Introduction to Flow and Transport in Porous Media . . . . . . . 163 4.2 Singularity distributions for the analysis of multiple-fluid flow through porous media, J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 65, 1960, pp 3739-3758 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167 4.3 Moir´e patterns of the membrane analogy for ground-water movement applied to multiple fluid flow, J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 66, 1961, pp 3625-3628 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187 4.4 A many-valued hodograph in an interface problem, Water Resour. Res. Vol. 1, 1965, pp 543-555 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191 4.5 Generating functions in the theory of flow through porous media, Chapter 9, Flow Through Porous Media, Academic Press, 1969, pp 377-400 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 4.6 Vortex theory for multiple fluid in three dimensions, Delft Progress Report, 4 , 1979, pp 87-102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228 4.7 The simultaneous flow of fresh and salt water in aquifers of large horizontal extension determined by shear flow and vortex theory, Proc. Euromech. Colleg., Edited by A. Verruijt & F.B.J. Barends, Sept. 1981, pp 75-82. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 4.8 L’entrainement de particules par le courant intersticiel,Proc. Symposia Darcy, Dijon, 1956, Publ. nr 41 of the UGGI, pp 139-147 . 252 4.9 Longitudinal and transverse diffusion in granular deposits, Trans. A. Geophys. Union, Vol. 39, No. 1, 1958, pp 67-74 . . . . . . . . 261 4.10 Discussion of Longitudinal and transverse diffusion in granular ,, deposits , Trans. A. Geophys. Union, Vol. 39, No. 6, 1958, pp 1160-1162 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269 4.11 Transverse dispersion from an originally sharp fresh-salt interface caused by shear flow, G. de Josselin de Jong and C.J. van . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272 Duijn, J. Hydrol., 84, 1986, pp 55–79 4.12 The tensor character of the dispersion coefficient in anisotropic porous media, Proc. JAHR Congress, Haifa Isra¨el, 1972, pp 259-267. . 297 4.13 Dispersion in fissured rock,G. de Josselin de Jong and Shao-Chih Way, Socorro Reports, NewMexico 87801, 1972 . . . . . . . . 306 ,,
x
Contents
CONTENTS
5 Appendix
5.1
xi
343
Cube with edges larger than those of the enclosing tessaract, Nieuw Archief voor de Wiskunde, 4, Vol. 3, 1985, pp 209-217 (+ Introduction: pp 207-208) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345
The most important papers by Professor G. de Josselin de JOIlS" on soil mechanics can be subdivided into three main topics: consolidation of soils, the stability of a vertical cut off, and the kinematics of granular soiL~ in the plastic zone. This last topic contains his main contribution to theoretical soil mechanics, and has been rather controversial for sollie t ime, before being recognized as an important fundamental frame work for the analysis of soil behaviour. He also made significant contributions to the development of measuring techniques in the laboratory and in the field . Some of these can be found in his theoretical papers, SQmc were published separately_ The first basic assumption of De JosseJin de Jong's model for plastic flow is that plastic dcfoTmatious are generated when the stresses satisfy the MohrCoulomb yield criterion, which ill a certa.in condition on the stresses, IUl.mely that no plastic flow occurs if in all directions (i.e. on all planes) the shear stress 1" and the normal stress u satisfy tile condit ion 1" < c + C1 tan
3
5
3.1 Introduction 10 Soil Mechanics
The constant volume assumption, or, to be more precise, the possibility of constant volume pl3.!!tic deformation, violates an assumption derived from work of Prager and Drucker that was IIsed with great success in metal plasticity, namely the assumption that the plastic potential, which governs the directioTl of plastic flow, and the yield surface, are identir.al. This is now called the assumption of an MlJocitlted flow rule. It took some time before it was realized that this is 1I0t a physical neces.~ity, but simply a COllvenient property of certain materials. It is now generally accepted that for frictional materials, such as soils, a non-M3ocialed flow rule describes reality much better, and that the constant volume 3$5umption often applies, especially for large strains. In modern models a vol umetr ic component of plastic flow is often incorporated as a possibility, depending upon the density of the material, but always with the constant volume case as the limiting situation for large deformations, or even the default condition. The independence of the two sliding components of the double sliding free rotat ing model also met with some opposition, because it means that there may also be a deviation of the principal di rection of plastic strain with the principal direction of ~tress in the plane of shear deformation. Thi~ may seem strange, because it may I.>c surmised that the coaxiality of the plastic strains alld the stresses ~ a necessary consequence of the isotropy of the material. The proof of that property prcsupposel> the existence of a unique relation betwccn stresses and strains, however, and this is just what De Josselin de Jong denies, at least for a rigid plastic material. Although it is IIOW widely acimowledged that this type of non-coaxiality may indeed occur, in many modern numerical models that include plastic How, the coaxiality of stresses and incremental plastic strains is still assumed, for definitcness or for simplicity. That there may indeed be a deviation of these two pricipal d irections was proved experimentally by Drescher and Dc Josselin de Jong in 1971. In a contribution to the discussions at a conference in Oslo De Josselin de Jong presented some interesting results from large scale shear tests on sand , which also seem to indicate Ilon-coaxiality. Another important property of hi~ model is t he frcc rotation, which states that wh ile the derorlllatiolL~ may be determined by the stresses, the displacement field may include an arbitrary additional rotation. Thi~ may now seem rather trivial, but at the time of the presentation of the model, which were the days of analytical solutions of elementary problems, it gave risc to considerable COHtro\'CTllY. This was particularly evident in the analysis of the results of simple shear tests. The classical interpretatiou of this type of test is that the critical rat io of shear stress to normal stress is reached on llorizontal planes, so that the friction angle can immediately be determined from this ratio. De Jossclin de J Ollg rca.!i:red that the uniform ~ h ear defor mation is also consistent with shearing along vertical planes, plus a rotation (t he toppling book row mechanism) , and that t his failure mode i~ much more likely to occur if the horizontal normal stress is smaller than the vertical normal stress. It gave him great satisfaction when one of the leading English scientists, Peter Wroth, appeared to support his views. De Jesselin de Jongs model could be used to explain the highly variable resu lts of shear tcsts. In modern finite element models ~hat include plastic flow the free rotation usually is automatically ensured, but it seems that the
4
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
3,1 Introduction to Soil Me<:haniCS
•
assumption of ooaxiality of stresses and strain rates may be all unsafe constraint in many of these models. Anothe r somewhat controversial topic was t he derivation of lower limits for the maximu m height of a vertical cut off in a uniform cohesive material, wi t hout internal friction . An upper limit, on the basis of a circular sli p snrface, was ohtained by Fellenius in 1927: Ii < 3.83c/'Y. Simple lower limits can be oOOtinoo from l.'Quibri um fields as h > 2c/'Y and h > 2,82c/'Y. Using his graphical technique of constructing strCSI:I fields that satisfy the two equilibrium eqnations and t he yield condit ion De Jossclin de J ong succeeded in gradually raising this lower limit , reaching a value h > 3.39c/'Y in 1978. Unfortunately, in the same year Pastor obtainoo au even higher lower limit, h > 3.64c/'Y, using a completely different method. It has been conjectured that perhaps the existing upper linlit, h < 3.83e!'y, is also a lower limit, and it may seem t hat certain variational techniques can be used to prove that. In the early 1980's this lead to considerable controversy in the pages of Geotecbnique. De Jossclin de Jong (and others) argued, rather convincingly, that it is extremely difficult to avoid certain hidden fallacies in the variational approach, and the hope on a breakthrough seems to have vanished. Among ~il engineers De Jos.'!CJin rie Jong was one of the first to realize that the three dimensional consolidation thoory of Blot (and not the much simpler heaL conduction analogy) was the proper generalization of Thrzag hi's one dimensional thoory. The thooretical proof is elementary, as Biots thoory incorporates elasticity thoory as a special case, in the absence of pore water pressures. Experimental support callie from laboratory test;! at the Delfi Un ive~ity on spherical i!amples, although his friend Robert Gibson preceded him in that respect by a few months. He published a series of papers on three dimensioual consolidation, in Dutch, with $Ome of his collaborators, prcscllting analytical jjQlutions to a variety of problems. Plans to expand th is into a book, toe'Cther wit h Gib~n and Robert S<:hiffman never materialized, perhaps because the i!ubject matter expandl.od faster than solutions could be derivoo, and perhaps a1!lo bllCallse the development of numerical methods made analyt ical solution methods somewhat obsolete. On the subject of consolidation it may also be mentioned that his admi ration of the p ioneer of Dutch soil mcrnauiCli, Professor A.S. Keverling Buisman, led him to try to generalize Buismans thcory of secular (or secondary) consolidat ion to a beaut ifni model including viscoelastic deformation and an early version of a mu ltiple porosity.
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
5
1.6 J,ower Bound Collapse 'l'heorem and Lack of Normality of Strainrate to Yield Surface for Soils By
G. de Jossclin de Jong In soil mechanics practice t here is a need for a lower bound collapse theorem, which permits an analysis with n. result on the safe side. The usual a nalysis of slip surfaces may give unsafe results for a. purely cohesive soil, since it is based upon a kinematically admissable colIapse system and therefore constitutes an upper bound. It is thereforo
necessary to investigate a great number of slip surfaces and the smallest load is an approximation to the a.ctualloa.d which will produce collapse, but it is never known how much t he computed load exceeds the actual one. Upper bound t heorems for a material possessing COULOMB friction have been treated by DRUCKER (1954, 1961), but it is still neccssary to establish a lower bound t heorem. Indeed a lower bound t heorem would seem to be of more practical value since it would lead to a. result on the safe side. Unfortunately the virtual work proofs of lower bound theorems break down ii the material does llot obey the postulate of DRUCKER: t hat additional loads canllot extract u seful net energy from the body and any system of initial stresses . Now in soils t here are two possible ways of extracting work, since soils in general are fri ction systems. The first possibility was mentioned by DRUCKER [1954J and is obtained by changing the isotropic stress in the body with internal friction. The second way to extract work is a con sequence of the possible deviation angle between the principal directions of strain rate and stress tensors. This can be shown by conSidering t he extreme case of deviation corresponding to the sliding
of the upper left block in Fig. 1 along a slip surface at
(45° - ; cp)
to t he direction of the major principal stress. The slip occurs under constant volume conditions. InitialJy t he stress state is represented by t he points A A in the stress diagram of F ig. 2, lying just inside the limit circle. The additional forces are t he stresses A B which bring
6
70
G.
PE JOSSn,n( DE J ONO
FIg. 2.
F18.3.
F Ig. 4.
!
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
7
1.6 Lower Bound Collapse Theorem
71
t he system to a failure condition at BE. Let lIS consider the case when the vectors A B make an angle p with the . · axis. 'I'hc angle p can be made as small as wo please by letting A approach B. The additional loads on the moving upper left block then consist of stresses uniformly distributed along the vertical and horizontal faces and acting at an inclination p to t hese faces, Fig. 3. The resultant T of the additional force s on the tlppcr left bloek is shown in ]?ig. 4 to
~P
make an angle of ( 4b" -
+ p)
with thc vertical.
Undcr the influcnce of t ho existing strcsses t he block slides in
p)
a dircction , at ( 45 " - ~ downwards. If the displacement of the block is LlS in that direction, then the work done by the body and t he system of initial stresses on the added stress rcsultant T is equal to LIS timell t he component of T in the direction opposite to LIS. The work is therc· fore. LIS· T cos (90" - p
+ P) =
LlS· Tsin (91 -
P).
Thi s is positivc if P ill smaller than p, t hus positive work ean be extracted. ' \Tork can be cxtraeted from a yielding system if the plastic strain r ate tensor plotted as a vector in the corresponding generalised stress space is not normal to the yield surface. In order to show the lack of normality in thc case of soil explicitly, it is convenient to consider a stack of IJaral!cl cylinders which form a two dimensional analogy of a grain system with internal friction. Then the generalised stresses are the 4 stresses a"" a", and t he gene· ralised stress space is t herefore 4·dimensional. Fortunately .1"1/ is equal to .IIZ and only the diagonal of lengt.h • is a relevant coordinate. Therefore t he generalised stress space can be reduced to t he 3·dimen. sional space of Fig. (l, with coordinates (1r' a", • Let the material obey a COULOMB friction law, such that the yield criterion is:
"r,,' """"
V2
V2".
To obtain a simpler expression for the y ield surface, the coordinates are cha nged in the orthogonal system p, q, t according to
V-2 (a", +(1" + 2ccotgp), , ~ TV>
q = 12
8
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
72
G . DJ: JO!!SF.1.IN DE
!
/'
/
,--,.,
,, q"m'f ,
r!i'')'
1/
Jo;;o
"---1 ,, , Q"tf ------; ,, / \ 'I I ,, ,, "'", ,,
e
"
'" Jo'lg.O.
p-1 (~-r1y) fl -S:rff
Fla. 7.
/
"
"
// "
/ /
"
p
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
9
1.6 Lower Bound Collapse Theorem
73
Then q is the bisectrix of f.1* and f.111' and p is a coordinato in the f.1*, (1,1' plane perpendioular to q. In these coordinates the yield criterion is
2p2
+ 212 =
2q2 sin':!.!p.
(2)
This shows that the yield surface is a cone with q as axis and which intersects tho planes for q = constant by a circlc with radius q sin !po The angle 'If is then related to !p by tan 'If = sin
!p.
(3)
If the rod material is assumed to behave as the mechanical model proposed by the author (1958, 1959) plastic shear strain rates consist
of volume conscrving slip in the directions at ( 45° ~ ~
9') with Ule
major principal stress. The two conjugate shcar stra in rates need not be e qual. If they a rc a and b respectivcly as shown in Fig. 5, then the deviation angle p between principal directions of strain rate tensor is giyen by a-b
tanp = a
+ b tan!p.
(4)
Since a and b can only be positive. this relation implies (5)
It can be shown by a straightforward but somewhat t edious computation that the deviation angle (); between the strain rate vector and the normal to tho yield surface is then given by: cos (); = cos 'If cos p.
(6)
Sinee the sliding motion is considered to take place at constant volume the strain r ate vector ell' plotted in a coordinate system corresponding to the generalised stresses, lies in the q = constant plane. This plane makes an angle 1jJ wi th tho normal to the yield surface as shown in Fig. 6. In order that the angle ex between and tho normal obeys (6) it is necessary that E;; is not normal to the circle in t he q = constant plane of Fig. 7, but makes an angle p with the radius of t hat circle. According to the first collapse theorcm a body is capable of supporting the external loads in any loading program, if it is possible to find a safe statically admissablo stress distribution a:},l. A stress distribution is called statically admissable if it obeys the e quilibrium conditions inside the body, if it satisfies boundary conditions on the part of the boundary where surface tractions arc given and if a yield ine_ quality is nowhere violated. For perfectly plastic materials the yield inequality simply requires that f.1Z(I ) lies inside t ho yield surface. This requirement is clearly necessary and is also sufficient because convexity of the yield surface and normality of the strain rate vector
ejj
10
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
74
G.
DK J OSSRLIN DF. Jo:m
to t hat surface ensure t hat t he rcal collapse stress stat e t hat the q uantity
O'ij
is such
is always positivc. The proof of the first collapse t heorem follows t hen by use of virtual work considcrations [for a comprehensive description of this theorcm a nd related matter sce f.i. Ko rrER (HI60n. Since there is not always normality in the case of soils t he yield inequality condition has to be modified. The modification necessary to take care of the angle It is only small if by some other means it is possible to prove that q cannot decrease below a ccrtain value q•. If the mecha nical modcl of Fig. 5 is applicable, Eqs. (4) and (5) say t hat the absolute value of It cannot e xcecd p . Now lct P represent a real collapse stress state dt), then P lies on the circle with ra dius q. sin q> in the plane q = q., Fig. 8. All strcss states ~r rcpresented
(! +
by a point R lying helow PQ, t he line at an angle n q» to t he normal in P , may be called statically admissable wit h respect t o P, because the angle. between any line P R and the vector £ii for It = p, 1
will be largcr t han 2" It . Thcrefore the quantity [if:) - ifijR)]
eij
will always be positive for It = p , and clearly t his resu lt is generally valid in the interval 0 < It < rp. Since the actual collapse stress will be everywhere on t he circle. t he staticall y admissable st ress state (J~(I) is limited by all lines PQ dra wn !rom a ll points of the circumference. This means that t he stress states are lim it ed by the dotted circle in Fig. 8, with a radius of length q. sin p cos p. Since the coordinates p and t actually arc t imcs the deviator stresses 8~, "t"~, the requirement of the dotted circle can be represented in the usual MOIiR-diagram of Fig. 9 by the dotted circle whose radius is eqm..l to the shear stress at the t a ngent point of MOHR-circle and COULOMlI envelope line. Thi s means that a safe statically admissable stress st ate is limited by the dot ted circle (F ig. 0) which is equivalent to reducing the angle of shearing resistance to a value tp. given by:
V2
sin p* = s ill P cos rp . Although by this modification of the definition for a statically a d missable stress state. the difficulties created by the uncertainty about t he deviation a ngle between principal directions of strcss t ensor Ilnd strain rate t ensor are circumvented , it must be emphasized t hat this only a pplies if by other means it is established that q cannot
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
11
1.6 Lower Bound Colla.pse 'f heorem
75
d ecrea se below t hc yalue q•. The region limiting the statically admissable stress st ates is t herefore giyen by a circular cylinder star t ing
Fig. 10.
on the base of the cOne with height q. and running up to infinity with a radius q. sin rp cos f{J. J. iie rat ufe D. C.: CQulomb Friction, l)lasticity and Limit Loads. App!. ?dcc h. :U , Jl,1. 1, 11 - 74 (1954). DRUCKEII, D. C.: On Stress· Strain Rela~ions for Soils and Load Carrying Capacity. Proc. Lst In t. Conf. lUeeli. of SoH Vchlc le Systems, Turin, 1961DJ: JOSSELlX DE JO IW, G.; I ndefi nitnoss in Kinematics for }'riction Materials. Proe. Conf. Brussels on Earth Prcssure ProblclDlI, 1958, Vol. I, Brussels 1958, pp. 55- 70. DE JOSSF.LlN DF. JONC, G. : Statics and Kinematics in the }'ailahle Zone of a Granular Material. Doctors 'l'hellis Delft, 1959. KOIT}~/l., W. T.: Gencral Thooroms for Elalltie. Plalltill Solids. Progress in Solid Mllc hallieB, Vol. T, 1960, pp. 165 - 221. DRUCKER,
Discussion Contribution de K. H . R OSCOE: J would lIkc to question tho uni versal application of ProfeS!!OT DE J ONC'S statement that the normality Ilondition does not apply to lIOils. The following remarks are Vllry tentative since 1 have not had an opportunity to make a prope r study of DE J o~w's proposals. It docs however see m that he is considering lIOil to bc a non-dilatant matcrial POSSCS8ing constant eohcsion an d constant intcrnal friction and he is concerned only with states of failure of such a medium. I wish to make two obser vations regarding these IUIsumptions. }'irstly soil is a dila tall t medium a nd as it dilates the
12
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
76
G. DE
JOSSEWN DE J ONG
apparent cohesion and internal friction will change. Secondly the MOIIR·COULO:.m envelope is not a. true yield surface fo r soils. If yie ld is defined as permanent irrecoverable deform ation then lIOils yield, and of course dilate, at stress levels well below thO&) required to satisfy the !fOHR-COULO~UI criterion of failure. The position can be made d llaror by referring to F ig. 1 wh ich
represents OUT concepts of tho yield surf ace, obtainod from triaxia l testa on samples of a saturated remouldod clay, in p, q, t space; where p = (1; 20;), q "" (<7; - a;). e is the voids ratio Ilnd a nd are t he major and minor pri ncipal effective conlpre1'lsiv(l stresses respectively. In Fig. 1 the curve N , N. is tho isotropic virgin consolidation curve a nd XpX". is tho critical state line. T he proje<:tion of the critical stat.c line on the (p, q) plane ialhe straig ht li ne 0 X~. When a aample reach<,"ij a state corresponding to a point on the curve XIX, it will contillue to distort in shear without furthe r di. lation alld wi ~hout change of stress. The (p. q. t ) yield surface for virgin and lightiyover. cOllso Hdatcd clays is represent.ed by the cUr\'ed surfa.oo NIN1X,X 1 and in my paper to this symposium 1 have Flg.l. isometric vie'" 01 1<1ulbe
,
+
a;
0;
,
potential eurvCll is governed by the equation q = M p log. 'PD where p~ is t ho p initial conaolidMion pressure, and At is as showll in Fig. l. Let us now consider more heavily over·consolidated clays. The experimental data that is available for such clays is mueh Icss reliab le t ha.n for lightly overconsolidated eiays, hence the following remark!! are e;o;tre mely tentative. Wo
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
13
77
1.6 Lower Bound Collapse Theorem
s uggcst that the (7), q, e) yie ld surface for undrained tests is A,AtX.X, in Fig. 1. Consider an ovcr·oonllOlidated sample initially in a stale ropre!!cnted by the point P. If it is subjected to an u ndrained lC6t it will follow a state path which may bc ideali!!ed by the path P RX 3 in Fig.!. During the portion P R tho sample behaves virtua lly elastically but i t begins to yield at R lind continues to yield .. "tl wurk h .. rtl.", u"til it ,·".. "h"" th" J,,, .. k tl",·i .. tu,· ~ Lrt'''~' .. ~ well a~ thu "riUcal state, at X 3 • If the sample was IIl!0wcd to dilate during a tost then presen t ev idence suggests that th e atate path comes above the undrained surface. For example an ideal rellresentation of a p = constant test is g iven by the pat h P RSX•. In such a test yield begins at R hut the sample continues to work harden over the rangeRS and attains the peak deviator stress atS. T he sample then becomes unstab le and SubSClluent succeflSivc states ~'Orre8pond to SX •. I su ggest that IIOmo path above a lin e such as RX~ m ay be found in whieh this unstable portion is not present. For such a te!lt the deviator BtresB would never diminish as the state cha nged f.-om P to X~ . Hen ce as II sample, of iuitial state P, traveJ"8CS any statc path between RX~ and RX s> it wi ll eontinually work harden until it attains the critical state when it fails . It is possiblc that 8. family of plastic potential curves of the type shown by OX; apply during all the wor k hardening p roCCllllllS und ergone by over-consolidated samples. T he eun'e OX; may have the same equation as N;X~ , but adequate exerimen ta l evidence is not available to be a ble to see ho w Buch plll8tic pote n t ials relate to the y ie ld Burfaces f or anything other than lightly over_CO!lllOlidated clays. W e ha\'e a littlc indirect evidence on the heav ily overcanaolidated or "dense" side from 1: Project/OIl oftile s imple shear tests on st-ool ba lls. (nlica! wft line This medium IIPI~ars, during any work hardening proeess, to have plastic potential curves of the type shown in Fig. 2. The equation ()f these curvcs is
T
= N
--- ---
rI log. rIo,
u
d where T is the maximum shear , FIg. 2. Pl aotic pol entlal eur"" " fe r .teel ba n • . atreflS and (1 the mean normal streflS under conditions of plane strain. This equation follows directly from the applieation of the norma lity con· dit ion to the b()\lnda ry energy equation which was discussed by POOROQSIIASII and RoscO}; (1961) for steel balls. }' urthe r wo rk is still required to eonnect these potential curves with the observed yield surfaces.
F inally I wo uld like to make the point t hat fa r too IQueh effort has been made in so il mechanics to study failu re conditions. Engineers design, and hope their structUI"Cll operate, at m uch lower stress levels. This iB the region of yield ing that Bhould be studied in detail. T he MoHR·Co uLOM I.I envelope may, o~ msy not, be shown to be va lid for the failure of soila but it is not a yield surface in the true .sense o f the word since the yielding of a sample cannot be related to a move_ ment on the enyclope. \Vith sueh a theory yie ld does not occur until failure takes place. R elere nces
POOROOS1U.!:lI.l, H . B., and H. H. Roscol': (1961): The co rre lation of the results of shear teste with varying degrees of dilatation. Prac. 5tb. I nt. Conf . Soi l Meeh. Vol. 1, pp. 297~304.
14
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
78
G.
DE J OSSY.MN OJ: JONG
ROSOOE, K. H. , and A. N. SCHOFIELD (1063) : Mechanical behaviour of an idealised " wet-clay". Proc. European Conf. Soil Mech., WicabadclI, October 1963, VGl.l. pp. 41-54. Rosco !!:, K . R., A. N. SoBOFl iJl.Jl and A. THURAlRAJAl[ (1963): Yieldillg of clays ill state wetter than critica!. 060technique 13, Ko. 3, 211 -240. R e p ODS6 d e G . DE J OSSJ.:I;.I N OF: JONO: It was Ilot my ;lItcnt io.! t o say that for soils t here never is normali ty, but tha t normality is not IICCCl!S&ry. I n t ho cases studied by ~1. RoscoJ'J normality may have been observod, but these aro special cases, which are lIot representative for the !litoa.tion in gClIeral. Thst :n . R-o SllUH did not observe the deviation of the princip al direct.iOlls of st rollS and strain rate tensors, is due to the fnet, that the stress coordin ates p nnd q in hie diagr&ms are not t he complete set of gener a.lised stresses. The Banlpies were 3·dimensional, 80 t he testresuits require a representation in '" !) dimensional stress spaea. Since shcBntreS3C$ on perpendicular faws &re equal t he amount of d imcnsions can bo reduccd to 6. The syatcm I t a lked about this mOnling, is 2_dimensional and !!O thcro aro 4 gcncralillCd streSSCil, from which Tu is Tu' rcd ucing the system tQ 3 streR8 coordinates. Since AL ROSCOE only oo nsidcn the stress comb inatio ns p fllld q, his graphs correspond in a. way to th o 0'=. 0'. plano wh ich in tersect s tho cone enclosed by t he y ield Bur face a long the axis_ The deviation of the pl'incipal directions of the lensort! is only visible in the plane perpendicular to tho axis.
0/. auui, 1'.16, /a citation de D . C. DR UCKER.
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
15
PROCEEDINGS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL CONFERENCE OSLO 1968 on Shear Strength Properties of Natural Soils and Rocks
COMPTES RENDUS DE LA CONFERENCE GEOTECHNIQUE OSLO 1968 sur les proprietes de resistance au cisaillement des sols naturels et des roches
VOLUME II
NORWEGIAN GEOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE OSLO 1968
16
PROF. G. DE fOSSEUN DE fONG (~ethcrl.ndo): In 'heir POP<' (3/ H ) Rose".. B....,'t .nd Col. ""·i .... .lIy .hroughout .h• ..,il "'.... S~ch pl."n 0' zon<> origin ... il ,h. OI.>l:<:COSivtly. S'n« pl."" •••• ~ .,,~l e or ± (",/ 4-'1'/ 2) w;,h ,~< major p.incip.>! "'''' dir«.ion h,,·e to tr. nomit. " ..... combin..ion which .. tn05t unh,ou ... bl. to ,upporl. i, ;. 'ppro.i. "," •• Iy in .hoo< di."",ion, .h'l ,h. '~p.u .. plalKS Or ..,".. d,,·elop. Th .... di ...... io... coincid. wi,h .be ",... ehorocto,;,.i ... Il= ..... 11<: ""«rio! it yidding in the U. dofo,.",.. ion. TIl< disc .... ruptu .. I"'" ..n nn be ... pl>«
'''}" .Iu,
"'me
.0
,h.
'0
,h.
l',oviJ«I ,,·i,h ,..,do> .• nd '''0 thin pl..tic , hod, .Iong .h. 10"·" 'nd upper pi,,,,,. '{1>< .ir pressure in ,h. p<>KS wu rcd~ b)· 0.9 "m. in order.o cr ..... n .lIround I" ... u .... Th.n le,en ,...... ppli«l loading dem.nts in tbe direction 01 .he .. deo, ouch ,hOI ••y"em of pure , hear . " ... wos added '0 ,h •• lIround p,,,,u,•. Th. princip.1 ..._ di«ctiono .n: ,hen p.... lle!.o I~ diagon.l>. The sand w.. d.posi.ed in b)· ... p.... Ilc1'o one of , h. di.gun.!. in order 10 pre,..n. 'hat .n""'ropy c.....d by doposition "'O\rld oHer. p... for one: of,~ ' ...0 conjug ... di ...... ion. of ;mm;",,", .he". Th. difference "i,h Rose"'·, ,impl. slleo. 'p",,'''''' it .h.. in hi, ' 1'1""'''' d O",lo, _ 1.65.03. 15.f< sU!,ily of ........... w"h orlltogonllJ uymp.ot ... T hooc .. yntplOt<s th.n h••• ,h. dir=i"" of 'he princip.1 .... in ... di« .. i",,". Th •• moothn ... 01 .be ..' .... which .... 'pproJ I",.i ,ute lot Aeri. 1 5 .. ...,y .nd Eorlh 5<:ien<:eo at D<:Jfl . how«l .n .verag. deviation angle botw.,.,n princip>1 . ,,_ .rtd ....in "u. dire<.ion 0/ 12". wi,h • • p,..d 01 .bout j ' . In order to in, ... igate wheth .. ,hi. homogcnoou. ddor· nu,ion field •• i".d throughout .hc .. "'pl•• be .. nd ,,·as mixed wi,h •• m:tll .moun. 0/ cen",n' .• "ough.o ..,Iidily.be Nn,1 m... by .dding "·'''r .10.". ,h. ' cst. Th...nd " ... d.posi.«I in block .nd whi,. lay~ ... After the bloc IlOd solidificd i. " .... b ..... d '0 , how .he •• occ ... ive<e<,ion, at 2.S em intc
'0
.h.
fer."".
.Iu.
",ceo
'e
'" Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
17
t1ut ,utical pion"" aI. fo,mro th",ughotlt the .. rnpl., Som.: origi", •• d in ,ho: middle of ~ IMd;ng .l."",n', The she ..• ",ain,rate diff«ro fo, ~II the ,up'i ... ";m". Th .......,n .rn,t 'hey wl ",.in·.... in .he ,up'u,. "'nes. Tho mech.n;sm "'-n'cd in ,h. tn t wos "'ry . imi!>. '0 .10. <m. P"'l"""'d in 'of. I. p, 57, sec Fig. 4 .. ktIl rcdoction of 'I' to q.' , sud> ,h.t
.'
om,,,,
How",'''' 'he noncoincidenee ;. ""Iy • minor difficult)·, "'" nujor one is .he ig",,"nee with rnp
......
",<0,
;,-
..... ....
....
Relcnncu
J.
11><0.,..._,;,-,
S,.",,~.,j ~; ,. IJo.!a;/ohk . _ oj.,.dO>
"'h.
CIfAIRMAN :
Th.nk )'OU "'of...... de J.,...I'n d. Jong - [ .m ,orr)" ..., Ole . hott of .ime, The follol>'i08 .p<.k".nd e d'occo.tu
18
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
THE DOUBLE SLIDING, FREE ROTATING MODEL FOR GRANULA I~ ASSEMBLI ES G. DE j OSSELIN DE j Ol\G* INTRODUCTION
T he sliding block model lor the mecha ni sm of deformation, in a body composed of grains, is based on the concept that movements of grains with respect to each other occur along planes that coincide preferably with the stress characteristic planes. J11 the case o f plane strain these planes intersect the two-dimensional plane of consideration along two characteristic Jines called 5, and 52. The object of this Note is not to consider the probable ve racity of such a model, but to establish the flow rule and the constituti,·e equations which follow from the special character of the modeL The properties are taken to be those tbat were proposed by de Jossclin de J ong (1958, 1959). In that model sliding can occur simultaneously in the 5, and 52 directions a t different shear strain rates, but limited in sense, and in addition the sliding elements are free to rotate. Geniev (1958) considered such a model, but restricted sliding to one o f the two characteristic directions. Most investigators reject this restriction and agree that it is desirable to permit a double sliding motion. Mandl and Fernandez Luque (1970) reconsidered the double sliding model and confmned equations, obtained by Spencer (1964) and Zagainov (1967) for the stationary case, t hat principal directions of stress remain fil\ed. However, the equations refer to a model that is restricted in its rotation, as if the sliding elements are forced by an external agency to conserve their orien tation in space. T herefore th!!SC equa tion s refer to a differen t model from that of de jossclin de jong. T heir model is not free to rotate and so it cannot execute motions which are commonly accepted to have been observed in reality, e.g. • Professor of MechaniCS. Department of Civil Engineering. Delft Univcmty 01 Technology. the Nctherlaoda.
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
19
156
TECHNtCAL NOTES
the rotation of the soil mass separated from an embankment by a circular slip plane. Another kind of rotation was observed in a verificat ion experiment by Drescher (197 1). Mandel (1966, p. 307) directed attention to this lack of fre£dom of rotation and re-established equations obtained previously (Mandel, 1947). However, he remarks that the concept of double sliding and rotation combined is void because every deformation wit hout volume change can be decomposed in such a manner. This remark is corred if sliding is free to occur along each characteristic plane in both senses, Le. either in t he direct ion of the shear stress on that plane or against it. By restricting the sliding sense as proposed by de J osselin de J ong the model is made to obey the thermodynamic requirement that energy is dissi pated during sliding. The necessity of t his requirement is a consequence of the frictional character of the mec::hanism. The grains of, say, a dry sand do not move with respe<:t to each other because friction forces in the contact points between them prevent this. Sliding can only occur if the friction is surmounted and therefore shear strain will develop only in the direction of the shear stress in the plane 0 sliding and never against it. De josselin de J ong (1959, p. 57) called this the requirement off direction and formulated it as
By th is restricting requirement the concept of double sliding and rotat ion combined is no longer meaningless because, when introduced mathematically, a system of hyperbolic differential equations is obtained with a limited range of solutions. This hyperbolic system is unusual, because its coefficients, instead of being fixed for every point in the field, obey inequalities which determine, instead of unique characteristic directions at every point, a fan of possible directions for the characteristics. This has been shown graphically by de Josselin de J ong (1959, pp. 72-80). The pertinent differential equation (de j osselin de j ong, 1959, p. 92) was given in terms of the undetermined characteristics and their curvatures and is unattractive. The object of t his Note is to fe-establish the constitutive equations as referred to a cartesian x, y co-ordinate system . These co-ordinates are strai ght and so the curvatures of the characteristics disa ppear from the equations, which simplifies t heir form. Since the cons titutive eq uation contains coefficients tlmt obey inequalities, it can be presented as an inequali ty. A common objection against the double sliding mechanism is that the principal directions of stress and strain rate tensors can deviate. It is often proposed that such a deviation can occur only if the material is not isotropic. However, the reasoning to substantiate Ihis starts with the assumption that an analytic functional relationship exists between the invariants of the two tensors (see e.g. E ringen, 1962, p. 158). Since for t he double sliding mode! the constitutive law contains an inequality, no such analytic function exists and therefore there is no need for coincidence of principal directions. Nevertheless the requirements of isotropy (see Eringen, 1962, p. 139) are fulfilled because the ineqUality is invariant for the full orthogonal group of co-ordinate transformations. This is also true for three dimensions. Mandl and Femandez Luque (1970) tried to remove the objection to non-coaxiality in isotropic materials by mentioning that in two dimensions the co-ordinate transformations for reflexion cannot be obtained from those for rotation simply by taking th e negative of all matrix components, as can be done in three dimensions. However, this only proves that a proof based on such a sign inversion cannot be applied in two dimensions; it does not mean Ihat ano ther proof might not exist. Another proof exists if there is a functional relationship between the two tensors. The functional relationship does not exis t in this case and therefore non -coaxiality is acceptable in three as well as in two dimensions.
20
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
157
TECHNICAL NOTES
, ,
"
.....
L
..
,
,
~
' "
i",
."l
,.)
.... "
"
" ''!:\'
~, ..
'., .
,
.... s,
'
. .,
, "
"
•
i..J
.~ .
,,)
I')
Fig.t( ..) . St.-e. . ch ...... cteri.tic. S. and S . in \he !t, y plane ( bold arrow. indicate direction. 01 principal .tre.... 0', and a n), (b) ~ . howing direction. in which st.-n ... are tak .. n ... po.lti .... , (c) U!:niUng s tre.. circle in Mohr diagram
STRESS CHARACTERISTI CS AND RELATIVE VELOCITIES ALONG THEM
The directions of the stress characteristics S, and S~ at a point P are given by the angles and "3 of their tangents with respect to the:c axis such that (see Fig. 1(a))
"I
(I)
In these expressions o/J is the angle between t he algebraically larger principal stress and the :c axis. Stresses are taken as positive in the direction of the arrows of Fig. 1(b) and so larger algebraically means smaller compression st ress. The angle of intemal friction is ,p. The limiting stress condition, supposed to be fulfilled in P, can then be written as
u.. _ - p+p s~,p c~ Z++c cot,p .... ~ = "u = P Sill,p SIn 2o/J u~ = -p - p sin,pcos 24t+ccot,p
} (2)
In these expressions p is the distance between the centre of the Mohr circle and the intcrse<:tion point of the Coulomb envelope lines (Fig. I (c». According to the Coulomb theory stress circles can exist only to the left of the inten;ection point of the envelope lines so that the requirement on p is (3)
In order to avoid the complication of differentiations along curvilinear C
dy. - sin '" dl, The x, y components d V!,
dV~
}
(4)
of the relative velocity vedor d V' of point P, with respect to P
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
21
TECIIN I C"!" NOTES
can be written as a total differential
}
dV! = V"."
dV; _ (1'•. " cos a,+ V"." sin a,) dl,
}
(5)
(6)
for the x.y components of the relative velocity of two points on an 5, stress characteristic. By changing I into 2 the relative velocity components of two points at an infinitesimal distance dl~ on an 5~ line are obtained. The curvatures of the 5, and 5~ lines give only second order terms in these expressions that can be disregarded. SEPARATION OF DOUBLE SLI DING AND ROTATION
In order to introduce the physical properties of the double sliding, free rotating model, it is necessary to decompose the relative velocity vector d V' into two components: d V~ parallel to 5~. the conjugate of 5, and d V~ perpendicular to 51 ' These ~tor components are taken as positive if they a re in the direction of the arrows in Fig. 2(a). The special manner of decomposition results in the following relations between the magnitudes dVi and dV; of these vectors and the x.y components of the relative velocity between P, and P dV~
_ [ -dV! cos a, - dV~ sin a,l/sin.p
dV~ =
[+dV1 sin
a2-dV~
(7)
(8)
cos a:J/sin.p
The separation is such that d Vi is due exclusively to the sliding mechanism and dJl~ is created by the rotation. A similar decomposition of the vector d Vi, representing the relative velocity with respect to P of a point Pi on the 52 stress characteristic through p. gives a vector d V: parallel to 5, and d perpendicular to 52 (see Fig. 2{b)). The special manner of decomposition gives
V:
,
, '., '.
"
~
I
,~~,
""""r
p
(a)
,j, )
Fitr.2(a). Decompoaltion 01 r.lative velocity dV' 01 point P , with NI. pe-ct to P into the compoIl(Inw d VI p ...allel to S. and d V: perpendicular to S" (b ) decompo.ition 01 relative veloclty d V" of point p . with .... p.ct to P into the compon.... t. dV: p ...allel to S, and dV: perpendicul... to S .
22
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
TECHNICAL NOTES
159
for the magnitude of these vectors dV! = [- dVicos"'2-dV~sin"':J/sinof.
(9)
dV: _ [+dV; sin "'1-dV! coull/sin of.
(10)
The vectors are taken as positive if they are in the direction of the arrows in Fig_ 2(b).
V:
V:
DOUBLE SLIDING
The components d and d are due to the character of double sliding of the model. Considering first d V~, because sliding occurs along the stress characteristics a line element on an 51 stress characteristic is not affected by a sliding along the 51 family. Therefore t he double sliding contributes only a component d V: parallel to 52' Curvature of the stress characteristics does not affect the decomposition of the vect ors or the sliding directions at point P. In accordance with previous work, the quantity b is introduced to represent the magnitude of the shear strain rate along the 52 family by the defmition dV~= + bdllcosof.
(11 )
Substituting this in equation (7) and using eq uations (6) gives - V"." cos 2 (l1-(V ". ~+ V~.,,) cos (0, sin (01 - V~.~ sin a (01 ""' +b sin of. cos of. Elimination of (01 with equations (1) gives -(V.... ,,+ Vu.u)-{V ". ,,- V u•• ) sin (2rf-of.) +(V". u+ V~. ,,) cos (2rf-of.) = +b sin 24
(12)
Considering second d V:, the double sliding model infers that a shear strain rate along the 51 family can exist, with a magnitude dV;, independent of slidings along t he Sa family. A quantit y a for the shear strain rate along the 51 family was introduced in previous work, which is defined by
(13) Substituting equation (9) and using equations (6) with 1 replaced by 2, an d eliminating (02 from equation (I) gives -(V...,,,+ Vu . ~)+{V ,,_,,- V~ . ~) sin (2rf+of.)-(v" .• + V~ , ,,) cos (2",+of.) = +a sin 24>
(14)
Equations (12) and (14) were not mentioned by Mandel (1966) or Spencer (\964) although they can be derived directly from their analyses. In Mandl and Fernandez Luque's (1970) notation '1 = -b cos of.. ' 2= - a cos of., (",,= - V ".X and so on and equations (12) and (14) can be deduced from the first two of their eq uations (83). ROTATIO:-I
The components d V~ and d V: are due to rotation of the sliding elements. The representat ion of reality by the model is such that these elements, which can be visualized as infinitesimal curvilinear rhomboids, slide and ro tate but remain rigid during motion conserving their shape. This means that every line of such an element rotates at the same rate, with an angular velocity of magnitude {J anticlockwise. Then the relative velocity components (8) and (iO) perpendicular to the stress characteristics have a magnitude dV~-{Jdll
}
(15) dla Rigid body rotation of the elements can be generated by several situations. Spencer (1964) mentioned two causes: sliding of the elements along stress charact eristics that are curved, and rotation of the principal stresses in a point, in the non-stationary case. These
dV: _
{J
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
23
160
TECItNICAL NOTES
rotations are due to local circumstances, but are not the only reason for the occurrence of rotation. If the model is free to rotate, the local sliding elements will follow every rotation without resistance, and also the rotations imposed by the surrounding elements up to the boundaries of the body. These additional rotations can be different in every other situation and are introduced as an unknown variable and arbitrary function of x and y. The locally generated rotations mentioned by Spencer are submerged in the unknown magnitude of all those rotations together. The quantity!} introduced by equations (15) is the total rotation that includes all these effects and whose magnitude, being an unknown variable of x and y, cannot be specified from local conditions only. Therefore flow equations containing!} cannot be considered as constitutive equations. Introducing equations {Sl and (to) and combining them with equations (6) gives
+ V ".N cos a, sin (r~+ V x.• sin a, sin a.- V~.x cos a,
cos a.-
V~.~
sin
a, cos a.
=
n sin > (16)
+ V x.x cos a. sin a, + V "'.~ sin a. sin a,- V~.x cos a. cos a,-
V~.~
sin a. cos a, _ nsin.p (17)
Elimination of
n from these equation gives
W., .. + V",~) sin (a2-a,)
Since
a.-a, _
... 0
l".+.p this reduces to V" . J<+V,,~ = O
(IS)
This is the relation for volume incompressibility, a property known to be exhibited by the double sliding, free rotating model. Adding equations (16) and (17) and substituting equations (I) gives
(V J<,,,- V~.v) sin 2.p-(Vx,,,+ V".,,) cos 2++( - Y,... ,,+ V•. ,,) sin > = 2.0 sin.p
(\9)
Equations (18) and (19) are identical to Spencer's (1964) equations (3,20) and (3.21). CONSTI T UTIVE INEQUALITIES
In the previous sections flow rules have been derived that describe the behaviour of the double sliding, free rotating model. In order t o compute a velocity fie ld from boundary conditions, it is sufficient to know two relations concerning V" and V~ or their derivatives in every point. However, the flow rules (equations (12), (14), (18) and (19)) also contain the unknown sliding rates <1 and b, and the unknown rotation n. Spencer (1964). Zagainov (1967) and Mandl and Fernandez Luque (1970) usc only equations (IS) and (19) because in their opinion nis a known quantity. Mandel (1966) realized that n is unknown and concluded that the equations (IS) and (19) are insufficient. In this Note equation (19) is discarded because it contains the unknown n. This leaves equations (12), (1 4) and (18) and the unknowns V ". V~, <1 and b. These three equations are apparently insufficient for four unknowns. However, so far the thennodynamic requirement of energy dissipation has not been used and when introduced it produces a treatable system, although it consists of inequalities. Adding equations (12) and (14) and substitution of equation (IS) gives
(V ... , .. -
V~, ,,)
cos 2.f sin ,,6 + (V ... ,. +
V~, ...) sin
2.p sin,,6 _ (a +6) cos.p sin.p
(20)
Multiplication by p and substituting equations (2) gives
Using equation (18) this gives V".,..a,,+ V ••• a.+ V,. .....,.. + V • . " ...." .., p(a+b) cos ~ sin ~
(21)
The terms on the left-hand side of equation (21) together fonn the energy produced by the stresses on the strain rates. In order that no work is extracted from the system, this quantity should always be positive, and this means that the term on the right-hand side of equation (21) must be positive. The angle of intemal friction lies between zero and i .. and p,.,O, so a+b must be positive. Since the sliding rates a and b are independent it follows from thermodynamic considerations that a and b are both positive. so that equation (21) dictates the req uirements
• >0 '> 0
}
(22)
These requirements can be written in terms of V. and V. and their derivatives by use of equations (12) and (14). Using equation (14) and a ,., 0 gives the first part of the consecutive inequality (23) and using equation (12) with b,.,O gives the second part [ -(V" ... - V •.• ) cos :¥-(V..... + V •.• ) sin:¥l sin ~ } :!;; [-(V•. ,.- V •.• ) sin 2-+ (V,. .• + V .... ) c~s 2-1 c~s ~ . :!;; [+(V " .... - V •.• ) cos :¥+(V x•• + V •. x) SIn :¥l Sin ~
(23)
This inequality together with equation (\8) gives the constitutive relations for the double sliding, free rotaling model of a granular assembly. It can be verified that (23) is invariant for the full orthogonal group of co-ordinate transformations. This justifies the use of the inequality (23) together with the invariant expression (18) as the constitutive law for an isotropic material. Introducing the angle f between the % axis and t he principal direction of strain rate with the algebraically larger value gives (V ...... -V •.• ) ~ Wcos2f (Vx •• +V •. x) = W sin 2f
}
(24)
with W = y'[(V... x - V•.• )~+ (V x • • + V ....)~l where IV is twice the strain rate de\'iator, which is always positive. Substituted into (23), these inequalities reduce to -cos 2(f --) si n> :!;; sin
2(~-'M
cos> :!;; cos 2( f-.p) sin >
which can be written as -tan~:!;; tan2(~-.p):!;;
+tan>
(25)
by dividing the inequalities by cos 2(f-.p) , which is always positive because IV cos 2(~ - .p)_ (a+b) cos." according to equations (20) and (24), whereas (a+b) cos." is positive because of inequalities (22). Introducing the deviation angle i between the principal directions of the stress and strain rate tensors by the definition i .. f-.p
(26)
the inequality (25) shows that this deviation angle obeys (27) 3+
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
25
162
TECHN I CAL NOTES
FIg. 3.
PO."ible direction" 01 v elocity eharaeterl..Ue" are Ihnited to !.he _haded , .......
HYPERBOLIC CHARACTER OF CONSTITUTIVE RE LATIONS
The constitutive inequality (23) and equation (18) form a system of differential equations in Y,,, and V., by which the possible range of flow fields can be computed from boundary conditions. The hyperbolic character of this system can be shown by the foUowing analysis as suggested by Strack (1970). Substituting equation (26) into (24) the fundamental inequality is given by (28)
This equation is an inequality because i obeys (27). derivatives of V ~ and V. and are of the fonn
From the theory of differential equations it is known that the system (29) is hyperbolic with characteristic directions 01 and O~ if (31)
is real.
In this expression a = A 1C, -C1 A2 _ cos 2{';+i)
b = AID,+B1Ca-C,B1 - DIA, = 2 sin 2(",+1')
, = B1D2-D1B, _
26
- cos2(';+i)
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
TECHNICAL :';OTES
163
It follows that the root of equation (31 ) is real as
v(b 2 -4ac) _ v[4 sin' 2(.p+' ) + 4 cos' 2(.p+i)) _ 2 The system is therefore always hyperbolic regardless of the value of i. The characteristic directions 8, and 82 follow from (31) tan 81 • •
=
[sin 2 (.p+i) ± I]{cos 2(.p+1')
giving for the angles tI, = .p +i+fn" tI, _ .p+i-t"
}
(32)
CONCLUSION S
The velocity characteristics are everywhere perpendicular, be<:ause tI, - tI._,,/2, and this is in agreement with the volume conserving cllaract er of the model. The characteristic directions are limited by lans whose boundaries deviate by I/-{2 from the bisectrices of the principal st ress directions whose angles with the % axis are .p ± ,,{4 (see Fig. 3). A boundary value problem which in the case 1/- - 0 has a un iq ue solution has a limited range of solutions if 1/-#:0. REFERENCES DaHscII&Jt, A. (1 971 ). Private communication. Ea'''(;II<, A. C. (1962). Nrm..Jittea. I';e.,.,. of CMlli .... o... media. 477 pp. Kew York: McCraw-H ill. GSIns d·/>ooul" m" nt d~s sols ideaux en deformation plane et Ie ooncept du double gliMement. J. M 6,A. Phyt. Sclid$ 14. 303-308. MANDL, G. &; F"ERo;.("DIZ Lugu l, R. (1910). Fully developed. plastie ohear How of granular material!. GkII'''''iq'''' 20, No.3, 211-301. S PI"cn, A. J. M. (1964) . A theory of the kinema!i ca of ideal ooil. under plane strain conditions. J. M.d. Phy•. Solid. 12, 331-351. Su~c", O . D. L. (1910). Private commulliCII.tion. Z"'(;~I"OV, L. S. (1961). On the equations of the plane stationary I train of a granular medium (in RUSSian). M.c~. T lJlrdovo Tda. No.2. 188-196.
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
27
1. Mech. Pbys. Solids, 1972, Vol. 20, pp. 337 to 3'1. Perpmoa PIUS. Priated io Greal Brilai4.
PHOTOELASTIC VERIFICATION OF A MECHANICAL MODEL FOR THE FLOW OF A GRANULAR MATERIAL By A. DRESCHER lastitute of Fundamental Tecbnical Researcb, Warsaw, Poland
,nd G.
DE JOSSEUN DE JONG
Univenity of Tecbnology, Delft, The Netherlands (Ru~/vN
131h April 1971)
SUloL,"1\\'
Tlna PAPEIl describes experimeot! performed 00 an assembly of discs constituting a two-dimensional analogue of a sranuJar material. lbc usc of pboto-elasticity tecbniques allows tbe determination of
average Itress and Itrain-ralC tensors in the interior of tbe assembly. In this way, a comparison can be made with tbe behaviour predicted theoretically on the basis of a mccbaoical model. Test ~ults indicate that the main features of the mechanical model, namely, the sub-division of the assembly into sliding elements, a possible non-coaxiality of stress and strain.rate tensors, and a free rotation of the elements are all indeed observed in praclke.
I. INTRODUCTION
THE EXPERlMENTS described in this paper were undertaken in order to verify the !low rules developed for granular assemblies. The test set-up actually is a two-dimensional analogue of a granular medium because it consists of discs. The discs have different sizes and are stacked between two glass plates that prevent the stack from buckling side-ways. The assembly is loaded by bars to such an extent that the discs slide with respect to each other, thus causing deformations of the stack. When viewed in circularly polarized light the discs. being photoelastic sensitive, show a pattern of isochromatics, from which can be deduced the forces that are transmitted through the contact points between the discs. By averaging these forces over a region in the interior of the assembly, it is possible to assign an average stress tensor for that region. From the photographs of successive stages during a deformation cycle it is possible to determine the relative displacements of the individual discs. From these displacements an average velocity-gradient tensor (and its symmetric part, the average strainrate tensor) can be deduced for the same region where the average stress tensor is determined. Verification of the flow rules consists in relating the average velocity-gradient tensor to the average stress tensor that applies during the occurrence of the deformation. Because both tensors can be deduced from photographs the test results are not 24
337
28
338
A. DRESCHER and G . DE JosstLlN DE JOl'ou
disturbed by the measurements. Also, the disturbances existing at the boundaries of a test set-up can be eliminated in this case, because the region of considera tion can be selected from a part of the interio r where the average stress tensor is homogeneous. The two-dimensional analogue of a granular material was introduced by SCHNEEBELI (1956) in the form o f an assembly of metal rods. In such a test sel-up only the displacements of the rods can be observed. Tests executed with these models have been reported by DE J OSSELI N DE l ONG (1959), STUTZ (\963), DRESCHER, KWASZCYNSKA and MR6z (1967). In general, however, the interpretation of test results is unsatisfactory because the force distribution in the interior has to be inferred from the boundary conditions, wit hout the possibility o f eliminating the dis turbances at the boundaries. DANTU (1 957) and WAKABAYASH I (1957) suggested the use of o ptically-sensitive material for the rods or discs in order that the forces in the discs could also be determi ned. Analysis of the force distribution in such a test was described by DE JOSSELI N DE JONG and VliRRUUT (1969). Their procedure was ado pted in the tests reported in this paper. By using photoelasticity techniques the forces in the interior o f the disc assembly can be measured without the introduction of disturbing foreign elements. A region in the interior of the assembly can be selected in which the stress state is homogeneous enough to serve as a tes t sample. Here, we shall call that region the represenratiue area. Thus, it is possible to avoid the usual unsatisfactory procedure o f determining the stress state from the boundaries and of inferring homogeneity. altnough that is doubtful because the boundaries always contain dist urbances. Because the polarizator was not large enough to cover tne entire disc assembly, only a part of tnis was considered, from which only a circular area of 8 cm radius was finally selected as the representative area, because tne stress in that region was sufficiently homogeneous. In that area the shear stress on a norizo ntal plane was not zero, although the horizontal loading plate was free to move in a horizontal direction and therefore the total horizo ntal force on the loading plate was zero. The reason for tnis discrepancy is the disturbance from homogeneity that exists at the corners of the to ta l triangular disc assembly. These disturbances can be ignored by adopting the suggested procedure, and the re will be no discussion in this paper of the relation between the forces to be measured o n the three enclosing beams and the actual stress state in tne representative circular area. Since both stresses and velocities can be determined separatcly and without tne interference of disturbing effects, an approxima te check of the flow behaviour of the disc assembly can be made. By flow is to be understood here the deformation that takes place after the initial adjustment of stresses and strain rates has been developed and tne assembly continues to move with large deformations under conditions of constant volume and constant stress. It has been pointed out by P. W. Rowe (during the informal discussion after K. H. Roscoe's 1970 Rankine Lecture) that initial adjustment in the lest reported here is obtained afte r deformatio ns that a re small with respect to tne total defo rm ation in every loading cycle, because the discs consist of rigid material. Since the test results elabo rated in this paper are taken from the end of the loading cycles, o nl y the behaviour of the material under conditions of flow is considered. So, tne non-coaxiaHty being reported here later on is not in contradiction to the observations of the Cambridge
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
29
Mechanical model of granular material
'"
group of soil mechanics workers who observed coaxiality in the initial stage of the deformation process. Several theories have been proposed in the past to establish flow rules. Instead of surveying all the proposals that have been made, we shall pay attention here only to the mechanical model of dnuble sliding, which is in accordance with Coulomb's initial ideas of internal friction. This model is based on the ass umption that deformation of a granuJar assembly consists primarily of sliding movements along planes that coincide preferably with the stress characterstics. According to that model the system of grains is sub-divided into elements consisting of many particles tha t remain as rigid bodies during deformation of the assembly because the particles in the elements preserve their respective orientation and contact points. The elements slide with respect to each other and are free to rotate as units. For a more detailed description of this model and its properties see DE JossalN DE JONG (1959). The test results reported here can be used to verify the equations developed for this double-sliding free-rotating model. In order to do so, the equations developed by DE JOSSELIN DE JONG (1971) are adequate because with these formulae the sliding rates and the rotation of the elements can be computed directly from the observed velocitygradient tensor. The mode of deformation interpreted in terms of the model as obtained from test results turns out to be a sliding movement of elements that slide in one of the stress characteristic directions combined with a rotation of the elements. A detailed investigation of the manner in which the individual discs behaved indeed shows that discs stayed together to form rigid elements that were elongated in the predicted direction and that executed the movements suggested by the theory. The double-sliding mechanism has been considered separately by several investigators. MANDEL (1947), SPENCER ( 1964) and ZAGAINOV ( 1967) have developed a set of differential equations to describe the velocity field of that model. Their equations are all similar, but they differ in the physical interpretation of the rotation term. According to SPENCER (1964) this term is equal to the rotation of principal stresses, whereas MANDEL (l966) also includes with this term the rotations of the elements. Because there is no physical basis that substantiates Spencer's assumption, the present writers agree with the second interpretation which means according to MANDEL ([966) that the equations mentioned above cannot be used to solve boundary-value problems because the value of the rotation term is not known beforehand. DE JOSSWN DE JONG (1959, [971) has developed an additional set of inequalities to describe the velocity field of the model based upon the thermodynamic requirement of energy dissipation. Since rotation is absent from these inequalities, the difficulty pointed out by MANDEL (1966) is circumvented, and the solution of boundary-value problems can be obtained with these formulae. Instead, however, of leading to a unique solution, the inequalities only provide a range of possible solutions. This is unattractive due to the lack of uniqueness, and it is of interest to know whether the difficulty mentioned by Mandel really exists. Crucial in this regard is the question.of whether the elements can rotate separately from the principal stresses. The test results provide a means of verifying this particular point and show that rotations of principal stresses and elements can even be in opposite senses. DE lOSSEUN DE lONG (1 958, 1959) showed that a consequence of the double-sliding mechanism is the possibility that stress and strain-rate tensors arc not coaxial. All the
30
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
340
A. DREScIiER and G. DE JOSSELIN DE JONO
workers mentioned above agree upon this consequence, but in the past doubts have often been raised (:oncerning Ihis model, because non-coaxiality in isotropic mate rials is apparently prohibited. This resu lt, however, is based upon the assumption that there exists a functional relationship between only stress and strain-rate tensors. Since, for the flow stage considered here, such a functional relationship does not exist, the result cited does not necessarily apply, The lest res ults presented here provide the possibility of verifying whether noncoaxiality exists in reality, and they show that deviation actually occurred in the experiments.
2. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE AND TEST RESULTS
The detailed description of the tcchnique of measurement, the test programmes. and the results obtained will be given elsewhere. In this paper. only the main results of the experiments will be briefly described. Figure I presents schematically the system used for loading the disc assembly, this consisting of a fixed beam and a rotating beam hinged at the bottom. The
FlO. I. Scheme: of loading system.
wedge.shaped area of I755cm l was filled with approximately 1200 discs, made from 6mm thick plate of CR·39 co-polymer, a relatively.sensitive photoelastic material. Six different diameters of discs were used. ranging from 8 to 20mm. A movable loading plate was placed horizontally on the upper surface of the assembly. The experiments consisted of ro tating the hinged beam such that its angle a: with the fixed beam changed slowly and gradually. The ellperiments began with a counterclockwise rotation th rough 100 of the hinged beam, whieh initially made approxi. mately a right angle with the fixed beam. Next, a clockwise rotation backwards th rough a similar angle was ellccuted. During rotation of the hinged beam the loading plale could move freely and follow the deformation mode of the disc assembly.
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
31
o FIG. 2. Photoe last icity pi cture of the granu lar assembly.
X,
--X,'m'
,,
,
,,
'~ S
,,
,m,
X
,
X, FIG. S. Component$ of surface traclion vector in discrete assembly.
32
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
Mechanical model of granular material
341
During each test, several photographs of the model for different stages of deformation were taken. Owing to the initial pre-s tressing of the discs by the loading plate the interaction of the particles produced sufficiently high stresses within the discs during deformation to procure a well-developed isochromatic pattern observable in circularly polarized light. Figure 2 presents a portion of the tested model with the stressed discs al the moment of maximum counter-clockwise rotation. From the discs only the rims are visible as circles. Within these circles isochromaties are seen as a pattern of black regions. Greater black-intensity means larger forces. From the pattern it can be deduced that forces arc transmitted through the disc assembly along chains of discs. The oblique orientation of the chains of heavilystressed discs, as shown in Fig. 2, remained virtually the same during the entire counter-clockwise rotation in every test, while a clockwise rotation produced chains positioned more or less ve rtically. The magnitude and direction of the contact forces could be evaluated by measuring the geometry of the isochromaties in the vicinity of the contact points. In order to perform this evaluation, preliminary calibration tests were required. Using these results the calculation of forces was executed for the entire inner region OABCD (see Fig. 1) and for several stages of deformation. The correctness and accuracy of the determination was ...-erified by constructing a Maxwell diagram of forces, and tracing the lines of actio n of the forces in the disc assembly. These two diagrams must consist of closed polygons, in order that equilibrium both in horizontal and vertical directions as well as equilibri um of moments is satisfied for each disc. All this was executed according to the procedure described by DE JOSSELIN DE JONO and VERRUIJT (1969).
Figure 3 presents the Maxwell diagram (consisti ng of about 600 individual forces) corresponding to Fig. 2. The fact tha t the Maxwell diagram obtained from the isochromaties consists of closed polygons is an indication that, if buckling of the disc assembly side-ways towards the glass plates crealed friction forces between glass plates and discs, these forces were so small that they are submerged within the overall accuracy. Figure 4 shows the lines of action of forces th ro ughout the assembly. The thic kness of the lines is proportional to the magnitude of the transmitted forces. The points OABCD in Fig. 3 refer to those in Figs. I and 4. Hence, the distance OA in the Maxwell diagram is equal to the resultant force acti ng on the sector OA of the fixed beam, etc. The forces indicated by heavy lines in Fig. 3 are the forces whose lines of action are intersected by the circle with radius Scm around Q (see Fig. I). The more the whole heavy line approaches an ellipse, the more the force distribution is homogeneous. 3. T RANSITION TO T ENSORS
It is customary to present flow rules in the form of a relation between two secondrank tensors, one describing the stress state and the other representing the velocity gradient or the strain rate. Such tensors are in fact second-order averages. The first is an average of the discrete forces acting on the discs, and the second is an average of the individual motions of the discs. If forces and motions are distributed more-or-less
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
33
142
A. DRESCHER and G. 0'11 J OSSELIN DE JONO
~_ _C',--_"IO kg '
F IG. 3. Maxwell diagram.
o FlO. 4. A network of conlael forces.
34
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
Mechanical model of granular material
34)
continuously an averaging procedure gives a fair description of the situation in the assembly. The photographs reveal, however, that reality cannot be compared to anything continuous at all. The forces transmitted through the contact areas depend on the geometrical distribution of the contacts between adjacent particles. Chains of aligned contact points form rigid columns of particles which attract large forces because of their relative rigidity with respect to the surrounding particle groups. Since these columns are created by chance in a random pack, and the probability of obtaining a chain is small, the mutual distances between columns consist of several particles and as a consequence the magnitudes of the transmitted forces vary very much in adjacent contact points. This results in a discrete distribution of forces through the pack with. high forces at great distances apart. Such an arrangement of discrete forces is completely different fro m a continuous distribution of force inherent in the concept of stress. Similar discretc behaviour is observed in rcgard to the movements of the particles. If the direction of the force at a contact point deviates more from the direction of the normal to the contact area than friction allows, thcn a particular contact point will yield. The yielding of one contact is enough to create a movement of a great number of particles resuiting in a possible re-orientation of many contact points and a redistribution of the forces. The movements of the particles have a discre te character, which differs basically from a continuous displacement field which is inherent in the concept of strain. When soil engineering computations are to be executed for the prediction of the behaviour ofa soil structure, it is impractical to attempt a calculation of the discrete forces and movements of individual particles and instead it is common practice to use stress and strain tensors. Stresses and strains, however, are misleading concepts if the basic properties determining the behaviour of a particle assembly are studied. They are averages that blur the real physical entities responsible for the mechanical actions working on the assembly. If, however, stress and strai n·rate tensors are ineffective averages of the discrete force and displacement distributions of the particles, a more serious drawback in dealing with a particle assembly is our incapacity to describe its geometry efficiently with continuous concepts. It is a well-known practice in soil mechanics to mention for a grain deposit only its density. Although a greater density entails the probability of a greater number of contact points between grains, it is insufficient for a complete description of contact-points distribution. This distribution of contact points is actually the essential property of a granular deposit lnat has to be known in order to be able to predict its deformation behaviour under action of forces. Presumably it will prove impossible to introduce contact-point geometry effectively with the use of tensors, which arc averaging concepts only appropriate for continuous media. Attempts have been made to improve the continuum concepts by introduction of the Cosserat continuum (NIKOUEVSKU and AFANASIEV, 1969) or higher-order gradients of the velocity and mUlti-polar stress states. We shall not follow that approach here, because it is not our present purpose to propose better concepts for the description of {he discrete distributions observcd for forces, movements and contacts between particles. In order, however, to deduce a flow rule from the experimental evidence along the traditional lines, the discrete-force distribution and the movements of the
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
35
'"discs have to be translated into a stress and a velocity-gradient tensor. It is irrelevant A. DltESCHlR and G. OE JOSSD.IN DE
Jo~
how these tensors were obtained, because they afC only averages that ignore the rcal complexity of the aspects represented by them.
4. AVERAGE STRESS TENSOR
In a continuum, the stress is generally defined as the resultant force acting over a unit area. In the two.dimensional case, this reduces to the resultant force acting on a unit line. Since the forces acting in the tested disc assembly were not homogeneously
distributed and were of varying magnitudes, every other unit line in the assembly would produce another value of stress, if defined on the basis of individual lines. This would be an inappropriate measuTC for the averages. In the present paper the averaging procedure over a representative elementary area is used, as proposed by HILL (1963) and W EBER (1966). Although the formulae introduced by Ihese workers are different, it can be shown that they lead to equivalent results. Their proposals amount to the foll owing. If in a region V there is a stress state (II) which is in eqUilibrium, but otherwise may be arbitrarily distributed over V, then the average stress iiI} is defined as
Because (llj = 01.(l0) = XI.k(ltj and (llj satisfies the equilibrium condition (4.1) can be transformed by use of Gauss's divergence theorem into
-
I
1'11j= -
Jxll}dS
V,
(1kj,k
= 0,
(4.2)
where S is the boundary of V, XI is the i-coordinate of a point on S, and I) is the j-component of the traction acting on S at that particular point. With (4.2) it is possible to determine the va lue of the average stress tensor iil)in the region V from the tracti ons I) acting on the boundary of that region. Tensile no rmal stresses are taken as positive. In ou r case the region V was taken to be the area enclosed by a circle with radius 8 em and centre at the point Q (Figs. I and 4). Considering this circle as the boundary S of the regio n V, the tractions I reduce to the discrete forces -rio), whose lines of action are intersected by the circle (heavy lines in Fig. 3). The coordinates of the intersection points are ~'") (Fig. 5). The surface in tegral of (4.2) is then replaced by a sum ove r the p forces intersected by the circle to give
(4.3) If i #- j the summation over ~")T[") represents th e moment couple ellerled on the region V by thej-components of the forces acting on S. Since the determination of the force polygon and the lines of force network is such that equilibrium of moments is assured, this moment couple must be equal to L~") I1"), the moment couple oftbe i-components of the forces. The consequence is that iili = iii l and the average stress tensor is symmetric. Because they must be equal, a computation of 2):-)1)"') and Lx}-'ll1",l separately gives a verification of the accuracy of the calculation.
36
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
Mechanical model of granular maler,al
'"
Using (4.3), the average stresses tTll' tT1l' tTn were determined. From these stresses, the principal stresses tTl and an, as well as the angle I/J between the major principal stress tTl (the smallest in compression) and the horizontal I-axis, were computed. This was done for several steps of the experiment. Some results are given below. During a counter-clockwise rotation of the hinged beam over an angle l!.IX "" 1'5", at at
IX
= 90'5" :0'. =-7'lSNcm- ' ,
IX
= 89° :
an =- IS'4N cm- J , an =- 20·7N cm- l ,
a. =-S'6Ncm- ' ,
O
'" = 126'S
"
= 90'5° : it. = -6·4 Nem - , a = 92° : ur ",=- 9'2Ncm - l ,
IX
an =-U'8Ncm- ' , an =-17'4 Ncm-l,
(4.4)
l!.,;
= 1'5°,
''"" ~~ O ',} 6' .
(4.5)
During a clockwise rotation of the hinged beam backwards over an angle I
,}
'" = 119·5°.
" These average stresses refer to the circular region with radius 8em around Q (see Fig. I). This region can be considered as a representative area with a homogeneous stress state because a similar analysis, for seven areas of smaller size and covering that region, produced practically the same value fOf the stresses, and the heavy line in Fig. 3 resembles an ellipse.
5 . AVERAGE VELOCITY-GRADIENT TENSOR
From two successive photographs, displacement increments can be obtained. In the theory of flow of granular assemblies it is customary to use the term 'velocity' rather than 'displacement increment'. This infers that time may have an influence, but that is not the case here because movements were so slow that inertial effects can be disregarded and the particles we re dry so that viscous effects were absent from the friction develope
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
37
346
A. D RtsCH[R and G.
I)E
JOSSWN DE J ONG
s
"----------------------" Flo. 6. Scheme of appro~imation of discontinuous vdocily field.
Let U j be the components of the substituted veloci ty field. Because the field is continuous the components have first-order derivatives UI.J at every point, which together form the components of the velocity-gradient tensor. Averaging over the representative area V gives the components of the average velocity-gradient tensor Uf,) according to
1
iii.}
=
V [ UI,J dV ,
(5. 1)
which by use of Gauss's divergence theorem can be written as ii l •J =
1 v! u;nJdS.
(5.2)
Therefore, only the velocity distribution a long the boundary as shown in Fig. 6 is required for the computation of ii/ ,J' Thc successive photographs, used for the computation of the average stress tensors, showed the following values for the average velocity-gradient tensor componenlS. For the counter-clockwise rotat ion of the hinged beam over the interval a = 90'5° to a '" 89°, U],I = -0'0083, +0{10425,
(5.3)
U2.] ""
For the clockwise rotation of the hinged beam backwards over the interval a = 90'5° toa = 92°, ii,,] = +0'00875, U,.l = +0'01363,} (5.4) Ul .2 = -0,00967. ul .] = -0'0004, 6 . VERIFICATION OF DoUBLE- SUDING FREE-ROTATING MODEL
In order to verify the double-sliding free-rota ting model with the aid of the tes t res ults, relations wi ll be used here that were developed for this model by Oil J OSSEUN De J ONG (197 1). These relations express the shear strain rates 0, b and the rotation of the elements n as a fUDction of the components ul .} of the average velocity-gradient
38
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
Mechanical model of granular material
347
tensor, as follows: a sin (2rp) = - (iil,l + ii 2 ,l)+(ii l ,1 - ii l ,l)sin(2t,1t +rp) - (ii1,l + iil,l) cos(2t,1t + rp), (6.1) b sin (2rp) = -(ii 1,1 + Ul,Z)-(U 1,1 -Ul,l)sin(2t,1t -rp) + (ii u + 17 2 • 1 ) cos (21/1 - rp), (6.2) :m sin rp = + (u 1.1 + ii Z,2) sin (21/1)-(ii 1,2 + iiI. I) cos (2t,1t)+( - ii 1,2 + iiu) sin rp. (6.3) Since the sliding movements in the model are such that volume remains constant during deformation, an additional requirement is that the volume increase is
iil,l +17 2 •2 = O. (6.4) The model requires that the shear strain rates a, b satisfy the thermodynamic requirements a ~ 0, b ~ 0, whereas, according to the present writers, ncan have any value irrespective of the changes in the value of t,It. In order to verify these relations, values have to be assigned to t,It and rp (I'p is the angle of internal friction of the disc assembly). For qJ, we shall take here the value of 32" because this value for rp (or even somewhat higher values) has been obtained by several methods for assemblies of the same discs. Let us first consider the counter-clockwise rotation of the hinged beam over the interval cr; = go'5" to 0: = 89". Photographs were only taken at the beginning and at the end of the interval, so we have no information of the stress history within the interval. From motion pictures taken during many similar tests, it is known that the forces in the discs increase up to a maximum, which is achieved at the moment that the discs start to slide with respect to each other. Then, after the discs have re-adjusted, the forces falloff to build up again to a new maximum. The average stress tensors determined from the photographs do not correspond to the maxima, because computation of angles of internal friction from the relation sin qJ = (-Ul+UU){(U. +U1J gives values rp = 21'5° and rp = 24'5", which are smaller than the known values for rp. The motion pictures further reveal that the direction of the predominant forces remain essentially the same during these re-adjustments. Therefore, it may be assumed that the principal directions of the average stress tensor oscillate over only a few degrees. The two photographs give two different values for 1/1, from which the mean is ifi = 1(126'5°+119'5°) = 123". (6.5) This mean value fo r 1/1 will be used in verification by use of the formulae. In the interval considered, 1/1 decreased, which means that the principal stresses rotated over an angle 11t,1t (positive for counter-clockwise rotation) given by 11t,1t =_126'5° +1\9'5° =_7°. (6.6) Using the values (5.3) for the components of the average velocity-gradient tensor and the values iii = 123 ~, qJ = 32° in (6.1) to (6.4), there results a = +0,0204, b = -O{l002, n = +0'0212, volume increase = +0·0014 (6.7) These values are not in agreement with the theory, because b should be pcsi(ive and the volume increase should be zero. We remark, however, that the absolute values of these two quantities are respectively I and 7 per cent of a and n which predominate. Because they are only small fractions of the predominant quantities, a small correction in the value of I'p and the
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
39
348
A. DRESCHER and G. DE JossI;uN 1>£ l ONG
introduction of a small uplift angle in the sliding mechanism arc sufficient to reduce both b and the volume increase to zero. We shall not elaborate on thai possibility but consider only a and n whose values change but a little by such corrections. The interpretation of the result based upon the values of a and n from (6.7) is now the following. Sliding occurs predominantl y along Sj-strcss characteristics a nd superimposed on that sliding all elements rotate counter-clockwise. This mode of deformatio n is shown schematically in Fig. 7. Figure 7(c) shows the original position with the sl,lines, that divide the ma terial into clements that are to
FIG. 7. Sequen<:e showing how a countcr-clockwisc rotation of the hinged beam is responded to in the material by a shear strain in s,-direction (a .... 0) plus a counter..::lockwise rotation (0 ...... c).
slide with respect to each other. Figure 7(b) shows the sliding of the elements, which creates a gap between the stationary beam at the left, because left-hand side elements slide upwards over the right-hand elements to satisfy the thermodynamic requi rements of energy dissipation. This gap is closed by a counter-clockwise rotation of the material and the hinged beam at the right together, as shown in Fig. 7(e), In reality, t he sliding and rotation occur simultaneously. The double-sliding free-rotating model admits many other combinations ofslidings in two direetions combined with rotation that satisfies the movements dictated by the boundaries. From all the possible combinations the one observed here requires the smallest force on the hinged beam. Since the disc assembly was forced to deform by that beam, the material seems to respond with a minimum resistance deformation mode. A similar analysis applied to the photographs of the clockwise rotation of the hinged beam backwards over the interval IX = 90.50 to IX = 9r gives the following results. USi ng a value of ifi = 30 for the mean value of I/J and if' = 32 gives a = +0,0020, b = +0,0232, n = -0'0187, volume increase = -0'0009, (6.8) Q
In this case again, one of the two shear strain rates dominates, because a is 10 per cent of b. Being both positive, they satisfy the thermodynamic requirements of energy dissipation, Volume change again is not zero, but only 4 per cent of the predominant values of band n. The mechanism now is a sliding movement along s2-stress characteristics, in combination with a rotation of elemenlS clockwise. A schematic representation of this dcforrnati,on mode is shown in Fig. 8.
Fto. 8. Sequence showing how a clockwise rotation of the hinge
40
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
Mechanical model of granular material
349
7. CoMPARISON OF TEST REsULTS AND nlEORY 7.1 Sub-division of the disc assembly into slidillg elemelllS The test results presented in Section 6, both for t he counter-clockwise and for the clockwise ro tation of the hinged beam, show a mode of sliding that has predominantly the direction of one family of stress characteristics. The disc assembly can only execute such a movemen t iftbe block-like elements, presumed in the sliding mechanism, are actually formed by the discs. In order to verify this assumption the d isplacements of the discs in the considered circular region were re-examined from the photographs. By shifting and rotating the photographs for IX ~ 90.5 0 and C( ~ 89 0 with respect to each other, it is possible to match the discs and to visualize their relative movements. It turned out that sub-regions of many discs apparently stayed together as units and that these units moved as rigid blocks with respect to each other. The sub-regions arc shown as shaded areas in Fig. 9 (which is a repetition of Fig. 4). It is seen that these
Flo. 9. Block-like 5ub-regions. units show a predominant elongation parallel to the sl-direction from Fig. 7. It seems that the units are created by the larger forces if they are normal to the contact surface. On the other hand, the impression exists that sliding of blocks along each other is possible because contact points are broken that transmitted forces whose directions deviate stro ngly from the normal to the contact area. As a consequence, the borders of the rigid disc units transmit a resultant force that makes a large angle wit h the border surfaces . This is in agreement with the observation that the division lines between units coincide with one family of stress characteristics. 7.2 NOIl-coaxia{ity of stress alld straill-rate tensors From the theory of the double-sliding free-rotaling model there follows the possibility that stress and strain-rate tensors are non-coaxial. The strain-rate tensor is the
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
41
".
A. DRESCHER and G. DE JOSSELIN D~ Joso
symmetric part of lhe velocity gradient tensor and therefore its components are defined by Olj
= ';;(i'iI,J+Uj,I)'
Being a symmetric tensor, its principal directions are orthogonal, and using the values mentioned in (5.3) and (S.4) we find for ~. the direction of major principal strain-rate,
fo r cc = 90.5 0 to II = 89°: ~ = 108-5°, for eX = 90'5 0 10 a: = 9r: ~ = 17.5°, A comparison with (4.4) and (4.5) shows that there is a deviation angle i between the principal axes of stress and strain rate of a magnitude, respectively. as follows:
i = t;-ifi = 108-so -12JD =- 14- 5°. i = ~-iJi = 17'5° _ 3° "" + 14-5°, where for iii the mean is taken of the values given by (4.4) and (4.5). According to the theory, this deviatio n angle, i, is limited to the region
-!(J} ,.;
i ~
+;1,0,
G
and since tp is about 32 , the values found are acceptable withi n the theory.
7.3 Rotation ofelemenrs The qua ntity 0 defined by (6.3) is the rotation executed by the sliding elements. This can be seen by division throughout (6.3) by 2sintp, because the formula then states that n is the difference between the asymmetric part of the velocity gradient tensor ;(il2.l-Ul,l) and a term of magnitude a-b. The term a-b is due to the double-sliding mechanism, which according to DE JOSSELI N DE JONG (1959) produces an asymmetric veloci ty-gradient tensor o f that magnitude by sliding of the elements at different rates without rotation. If the asymmetric part of the velocity gradient is greater than the factor a-b, it means that the elements a lso execute a rotation here called O. According to SPENCER'S (1964) interpretation, 0 must be equal to DifJIDt, the rotatio n of the principal stresses either in time at a point or by convection. In DE JOSSELIN DE JONG'S model, O is free 10 have any value independent of 1/1. In the experiments reported here, the change of 1/1 by convection can be considered to be zero because the stresses were homogeneous in the regio n considered, but there was a cha nge of 1/1 in time. According to (6.3) this change was tJ.ifJ = _7 G for the inlervallX :; 9O·5 G to IX = 89 G, indicating that the principal stresses rotated clockwise. According to (6.7) it was found for that interval that 0 = +0'0212, indicating that the elements r otated counter-clockwise. This counter-ciockwise rotation is also observed by super-imposing the respective photographs in such a way that the shaded-disc conglomerates shown in Fig. 9 match. A similar analysis applied to the test interval IX = 9O·5 G to IX = 92 G shows a eounter-clockwise rotation o f the principal stresses over 6 G and a clockwise rotation of elements, because 0 = -0,0 187. The conclusion drawn from these observations is that in both test intervals the rotation of the principal stresses and the rotation of the disc conglomerates were in opposite senses. So the tests indeed do indicate that 0 can be independent of D I/I/ Dt.
42
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
Me<:hanical model or granula r materia l
351
REFERENCES
1971
Proc. 4,h In!. Conf Soil Mech. Found. Engng. I, 144. Proc. Brussels Con[ Earth Press. Prob!. I, 55. Statics and Kinematics in the Failable Zone of a Granular Material. Waltman, Delft. Giolechnique 21, ISS.
Int. J. Solids Struct. 5, 67 1. c.r. hebd. seanc. Acad. Sci. 243, 125. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 12, 337. These Doc!. Spec., Universite de Grenoble. Proc. 7th Jap. Not. Congr. Appl. Mer".,
1966 1967
Cah. Gr. Franc. Rhea/. 2, 161. Mer". Tl'erd. Tela 2, 188.
D ANTU, P.
1957
DE JOSSEUN DE J ONG, G.
1958 1959
DE JOSSELIN DE J ONG. G. and VERkUUT. A. DRESCHER, A., KWASZCZYNSKA, and MR6z, Z.
HilL, R. MANDEl,
J.
NtKOLAEVSKII, V. N. AFANASIEV, E. F. ScHNEE BEll, G. SPENCER, A. J. M.
STUTZ, P. WAKABAYASHI,
T.
K.
and
p. 153. WEBER, J. ZAGAINOV, L. S.
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
43
de losselin de long, G. (I 988). Geotechnique 38, No.4, 1988, 533-555
Elasto-plastic version of the double sliding model in undrained simple shear tests G. de JOSSELIN de JONG*
In this Paper it is shown how to use the double sliding, free rotating model for materials with internal friction to predict the stress history in undrained simple shear tests. In its original rigid plastic form this model could not be used, because there was no unique failure mode. By adding some elasticity to the prefailure stage (thus producing an elasto-plastic version of the model) this unique selection becomes possihle. The extended model leads to explicit expressions for the stress history in a simple shear test. It is also shown how the failure mode taken by the model depends on the stress state at the start of the test. An active initial stress state leads to a 'toppling hookrow' mode of failure, while a passive initial stress state produces horizontal sliding planes. With the exception of elasticity, the other properties of the double sliding model, including dilatancy, are taken in their original form. The essential features of the stress history obtained from the analysis resemble those actually observed in tests.
Varticle montre comment utiliser Ie modele II glissement double et rotation Iibre pour prooire I'histoire des contraintes dans des essais de cisaillement simple non-draines. Dans sa forme plastique rigide originale ce modele ne pouvait pas s'employer, car iI n'y avait pas de mode unique de rupture. En ajoutant de I'elasticite II I'etat precedant la rupture, produisant ainsi une version elastoplastique du modele, cette selection unique devient possible. Le modele elargi conduit a des expressions explicites pour I'histoire des contraintes dans un essai de cisaillement simple. On demontre comment Ie mode de rupture choisi par Ie modele depend de I'etat de contrainte au commencement de I'essai. Un etat de eontrainte initial aetif conduit II un mode de rupture analogue II celui d'une rangile de Iivres qui s'ecrouient, tandis qu'un etat de contrainte initial passif produit des plans de glissement horizontaux. A I'exception de I'elasticite les autres proprietes du modele II glissement double, y compris la dilatance, sont prises dans leur forme originale. Les earaeteristiques essen tielles de I'histoire des contraintes obtenues II partir de I'analyse ressemblent II celles ohservees au cours des essais.
velocity components linear strain rates in x, y-directions VX,y + ~,x shear strain rate ~,x - v",y material rotation a angle of potential sliding plane e teeth uplift angle A angle between force and normal to teeth Poisson's ratio v* angle of dilatancy ~,,, co-ordinates in principal stress directions a~x' O"~y effective normal stresses, positive for compression
angle of non-coaxiality q" qh initial vertical and horizontal stresses in simple shear test x, y horizontal and vertical coordinates A' elastic energy dissipation rate F (1 - sin 2
(J xy'
a yx
shear stresses
effective principal stresses, positive for compression
auxiliary angle defined by equation
0"1,0"3
(40)
Discussion on this Paper closes on 1 April 1989. For further details see p. ii. • Formerly with Delft University of Technology.
'"
angle between x-axis and plane of a'l
533
44
534
d< JOSSEUN d< lONG
ill
a •
!(V,.~ - VK . , ) : material rotation structural rotation, rotation of the clements distinguishes dilatancy from nondilatanc~
time derivative (d/dn v objcdive (;()-rotalional (Jaumann) stress rales
INTRODUCTION
In his article with Randolph (l981~ his Rankine Lecture (1984) and again more recently (1987) Wroth considers the results of simple shear tests on day as obtained by different investigators. As examples, the observation by Borin (1973) is reproduced in Fig. I and the test results of Ladd & Edgers (1972) in Fig. 20. Wroth draws attention to the fact that the observed deformation al the onset of failure is apparently nOI the onc with horizontal planes of maximum stress obliquity, as is oftcn believed (see Instead, failure appears to oa;ur on vertiFig. cal planes of maximum stress obliqui ty and, in addition to sliding on tho§(: vertical planes. a
n
rigid body rotation is execu ted to m~t the boundary conditions. This failure mode is shown in Fig. 2. It can be visualized as a row of books, toppling over sideways when the left-hand support is removed. The possible occurrence of a 'toppling bookrow' mode of failure was predicted (de Jossclin de Jong, 1972) as a consequence of the double sliding, free rotating (DSFR ) model for materials witb internal friction. It was mentioned that the toppling bookrow is one case in a set of possible failure modes in a si mple shear test . The usually aca:ptro mode with horizontal sliding planes is another one of this set. The DSFR model admits both modes and all transition modes between these two extremes. Considering simple shear tests with equal vertical normal effective stress (1' on horizontal planes, the two extreme modes possess different shear stresses at failure. In the toppling bookrow mode the shear stress is equal to u' sin 4> cos 4>1 (1 + sin l 4»; in the horizontal sliding mode it is a' tan 1/>, with 4> the angle of internal friction at failure. Combinations of the two modes give values between these two extremes. For 4> _ 23" the appa rent angle of friction, the tangent of ~ ..
. 23 '
,
"
t.~,.,J
- 0 '\
- 0 ·2
'~=--
- 0 '3
Fil- 1. EfI'eniYe .. ress pili.. .... lbe f.ilure IU le from 1ft 1lIOdnti..... llimple ..... r 1..1 on nor .... U, consoIid.o l" k.oIia (411. from Borin, 1973), lat 10)
", ""--+--++---,, ---~ ,,
",
1'1" 1. T oppli"C Ioook ro.. _hlnism
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
11 111I11 1
"'. ,n
0'O~
i
~ 45
£L.\STO-PL\STIC VERSION OF DOUBLE SLIDING MODEL
whK:h is the shear stress divided by <1', is only 17·3· for the toppling bookrow mode, while it is 23· for the horizontal !tiding mode. Ignoring the toppling bookrow mechanism leads 10 an underestimation of the angle of shearing resistance. At Ihat time it was not known how to select between the various modes of failure. The DSF R model cannot predicl how a sample will behave in a les l: a behaviour that is presumably unique. This crealed an uncertainty which was allributed 10 an incompleteness in the model Ihus prohibiling its practical usc. II was recognized by Vermeer (1980 and 1981 ) Ihat the incompleteness of the model is due 10 ils being rigid-plastic. By adding some elaslicil y in the pre-failure stage he erealed an elaslo-plaslic version of the DSFR model wh ich produces unique solutions al failure. In this version Ihe sample 'selects' betwcen various modes according 10 its initial Slress Slate. In this respect the DSF R model, which is based on internal friction, differs from perfeo;t plasticity, where the unique response al failure is independent of the initial stress state. II is the purpose of this Paper to demonstrate the use of Ihe elaslo-plastic DSFR model by examinin g Ihe responliC of a sample in the undrained simple shear lesl and establishing the initia l circumslances thai lead either 10 the toppling boobow mechanism or 10 horizonlal sliding planes. The loppling bookrow was obse rved by Drescher (1 976) in phOlo-clastic tes lS on crushed glass. This material can be considered as a model material with properties resembling sa nd. The undrained simple shear teslS mentioned by Wro lh were carried out on clays. In these tests thc average normal effeclive stress reduces during the deformation. This indicales Ihal Ihe mal erial is contractive, i.e. negative dilalan!. The dilalanl version of the elaslo-plaslic DSFR model has reoenlly been implemenled for computer use by Teunissen & Vermcer { 1 988~ Their Formulation is in lerms of matrices and therefore differs in notation from the analysis given here. The relevant expressions arc however. identical. The DSF R model as developed by this Author in 1958, 1959 was specified mathematically in various laler papers (de Josselin de Jong, 1971, 1977a and 1977b) and Ihe principal features of this model will be recalled again here. In the first section of this Paper, the dilatant version of the DSFR model, which was desaibcd by this Author (1977a) using Rowe's (1962) stress dilatancy relalion, is redeveloped using only the laws of friction. This leads 10 th e plastic constitutive eq uations (14). In the second section the elastic part of the constitutive equations is developed. The combined elasto-plaslic constitutive rclations are equation (26~ How to divide the total st rain rates
46
inlO Ihei r plastic and elastic parts is presented vis ually in terms of vectors in the st ress and strain rate spaces. The procedure using a minimum energy principle is set out mathematically in Appendix 2In the third section the response of an elaslOplaslic DSFR sample in an undrained simple shear lest is considered. The mathematical results oblained consisl of e~plicit solutions for the stress paths in the Mohr diagram, lhe resemblance of which to Ihe test results already men tioned is the reason for this publication. SECTION 1 DOUBLE SUDING MECH AN ISM WITH
DILATANCY The double slidi ng model describes the plan e strain deformation of a ma lerial such as a soil, possessing internal friction, at the limit stress slate. It is based on the simplification of subdividing the soil by parallel planes, on which sliding takes place, because on them the frictional shear resistance is e~ hausted . These are the polential sliding planes. The Sliding is called double, because tllere are two conjugate directions for Ihe potential sliding planes, located symmetricall y with respecl 10 the princi pal stress directions. In Fig. 3 the two conjugate directions have both an angle ex with Ihe plane of the major principal compression stress. <1',. In order 10 distinguish belween the IWO conjugate sliding possibilities. Ihey arc called a-sliding and b-sliding respectively as indicated in Fi gs 3(a) and 3(b). The sliding planes divide a block of material into clements, that arc liable to slide with respect to each other as shown in Fig, 3. The plastic deformation of the soil as obse rved from the
");;. ' 1'; , ............
"• '" n" ......
l. Slidift& elelMlltJ . .... poIf'Dlia1 sIkIiDa; pIa_
.,
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
536
de: JOSSELIN de lONG
-. - ............ ...
L _ _--") '.!J,",
L____---' "
.~i.:"
'" ou tside is due to this mutual sliding. In the original, rigid pl astic version of the DSF R model the elements were supposed to be rigid. In the dUloplastic version the elements arc clastic and this looks aftcr the clastic pari of the strain rales thai
remain after tile plastic pari is accounted for by sliding of the clements. II is impossible to visua1i~c the two conjugate slidings occurring si multaneously without crealing gaps or overlaps. Mathematically, however. double sliding is introduced in order 10 take account of conjugate slidings that occur successively. as observed in reality. Discrete sliding planes as presented in Fig. 3 form elements of finile sizc. Mathematically it is oomple~
10 describe the diSC(lntinuous deformation of the soil created by their motions. By decreasing the thickness of the elements to infinitesimally thin slices, the sliding becomes shearing, and t he defonnation of a soil region can be described in terms of shear strain rates. The magnitudes of the two conjugate shear strain rates are called and bO in this Paper.' By allowing these variables to become infi nitely large, the di screte sliding of elements of finite size can be fonnulated mathematically. An essential feature of the DSFR model iii that the values of and bO can be different. This is due to the principle that in the limil state of stress sliding displacemen ts have arbitrary magnitooes.
,,0
,,0
I In eadier papen the shear strain rates were denoted by a and b. Throughout this Paper asterisks are used, when dilalancy is involved. The notaTion ,, ' . b' was inlroduood ea.lier (de Jossdin de Jong,. 19771) Ind is uoed here to be IXIn,istenl with Ihat paper.
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
\.
'" By oonsidering tbe sliding surfaces to be smootb tbe deformation is volume oonserving. Dilatancy is obtained by assuming saw-teetb protuberances on the sliding planes.. having uplift angles (J witb the general direction 11 of tbe poten_ tial sliding planes (see Fig. 4(a)). The angles ex and (J a~e assumed to be oonstants through out II. soil regIOn. The forces between the sliding element s are assumed to be transmitted exclusively by tbe faces along wbicb tbe sliding occurs (see Fig. 4(b)). All forces on tbe teeth are taken to be parallel and inclined at an angle J. to the normal to the saw teeth . Information on ex, 0 is obtained by oonsidering tbe equilibriu m of forces and th e exhaustion of the shear resistance on the sliding planes. This is developed in the .section 'foroe equilibrium· and Appendix I. In Ibe section 'kinematics' tbe geometry of tbe sliding motion is treated. These motions represent the plastic part of the deformations. Expressions are developed for tbe ve locity gradients in termli of the sbear strain rates " . and bO. as required for establishing tbe plastic constitutive equations. The relations obtained in these sections al low us to obtain expressions for the angles ex, 8 in terms of", (Ibe angle of in ternal frH:tion) and v· (tbe angle of dilatancy). In this Paper only the homogeneous situation is considered, pertaining to a soil body in which the stres.ses and strai ns are consta nts over th e entire region. Slich a sitllation occurs in the simple shear test examined in this Paper. When
47
S37
EUS'TO-PU$TIC VERSION OF DOUBLE SUDtNG MODEL
6',
,.,
,,'
'"
the stresses and strains arc not homogeneous the expressions developed here are valid for an infinitesimally small region.
The force K makes an angle ('" - 0 - ;.) with therefore
~:
K. _ K 005(", - 0 - ;') K ( _ K sin(II - O-).)
fORCE EQUILI BRIUM A co-ordinale system (~, {) is taken as shown in Fig. S(b) in the direction of Ihe principal stresses I1j and o') . The two conjugate potential sliding planes are located symmetrically with respect to the 'I-axis: both make an angle (lI with the {-axis. Consider a portion of such a potential plane of length m (Fig. 5(c)). The resultant force K on that plane has venical and horizontal components K ~ . K ( created by the principal stresses on the honzonta] and vertical projections of m. Thcir magnitudes are
K, _ u"mCOSII} K ( _ u', m sin II
"l
The angle If, of maximum stress obliquity in the limit Stress Slate is defined by' sin If, _ (o', - 0",)/(0"',
+ 0", )
(2)
Substituting K • . K~ for 0"'" o', gives . (K.sinl.< - Kccosl.<) sm '" _ (K. sin a + Kc COS a)
(3)
, for the case "'hen cohesion i, present. a lerm ~ cot
are found in principle by .... uming sa.. t... th ofmagnitude ~
48
II.
cohesion
~
on lbe
- <{(I - sin 4> si n vOlll t + sin 4> .in . 0)]'"
,,' sin If, - sin (0
+ ;')jsin (211 -
0 - ;.)
(4)
Because of the mirror symmetry with respect to;> the 'I-axis., the same for()l': K acts at the same angle ). with respect to the normal on the saw teeth surfaces of Ihe conjugate planes (see Fig. 5(a)). Equation (4) gives, for a fixed value of "', a set of possible value combinations for I.< and (0 + ).).
KINEMATICS
Let the regions represented in Figs 6(a) and ((b) consist of many infinitesimally thin elements (like the pages of a book) that are parallel, all at an angle IX. In Fig. 6(b) a constant shear strain rate /I . is assumed to occur, such that all elements slide wilh respect to each other. causing a homogeneous deformation. AU have the same kind of protuberances making an angle 0 with Ihe potential sliding planes. Considering only the plastic part of the defor· mation. the demenlS remain rigid during sliding. So Ihe thin elements conserve their length and all points of tho potentia.] slip _line through Q haY<> the same velocity VQ relative to P. Thus Vo makes an angle (I.< - 0) with the {-axis. because of the teeth uplift angle O. The shear strain rate a· is defined such that the magnitude of VQ is /1 0 ", where n is the perpendicular distance from P to the slip-line.
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
SJ8
.;. JOSSELIN de lONG
L
,.,
'" '
fiC. 6. V.locilios of slicn_, plo .....
Consider the line PQ at an arbitrary angle r with the ~-a~is. This tine makes an angle (Ii! + y)
with the slip-line and so its length is n/sin (IE + y). The velocity Vo makes an angle (0; + 1- 0) with PQ. The effoct of Vo on PQ is that the line is elongated with an e~lcnsion rale i;(y) and is rotated with a tilting Tale Ph') (positive counterdock wise) as given by the c~prcssions
+ VQ cos (:>: + l' -O)/ PQ } .. +aOcos(lI+ y- O)sin (I1 +l'1 Vo sin (ex
+y_
O)/ PQ
.. -a o sin (a
+ 1-
0) sin (a
~1;r>-1in"
+ ,1
i.:(yl - + V.cos(lI+ a-},- O)/ PR p
-b·
Sin
(a
-7 -
0)
}
Sin (, - II)
+ (t:- }' -
+ bO) cos ('J -
9) sin
o}
- (0 0 - hO) sin (0 - 0) sin 0
(7)
For y _ !If the extension and Iill rales of lines in the ,,--direction are obtained. These arc iJ(!II) .. +(0 0 - bO) cos (Il - 9) cos
o}(8)
+ bO) sin (tl< - 0) COS "
(5)
in F'8- (,(a) give.
.. - bo oos (a -l' - 0)
- 1;(0) - + (0 '
v..(. - jJ(0) -
V.. . _ + i:(!n) - -(0 0
wh ere a dot represents t he lime derivative d/dT. A similar analysis applied to PR with R on the cnnjug>tle
."
v., .• _ -
I.(y)-
pM _ -
differen tiation with respect to the subscript vari· able following it. For y _ 0 the addition gives
(6)
8)fPR
Sin (y -
(1)
Here b" is Ihe shear strain rate in the conjugate slip direction. This b' may be different from o'
according to the double sliding model. When bolh shear slTain rales 0 ° and b' are aClive, the tOlal elongation ratei:(y) and the total tilt rate j1(:I) are obtained by addition of the above expres. sions. The rales i:(yl and My) are functions of 7. By giving y the val ue uro, the above formulae give the elongalion and lilt rates for lines in the ~. di rection. Lei ~, V. be the veloci ties of material points in the ~, ,,-directions. Then the elongation rale is iJ VdiJ~ and th e til l rale is iJVJo~. These are written as VM and V•.~ where a comma represents
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
The derivalivC5 V(. ( . , ' eiC. are Ihe so-called veloci ly gradients. In addition to the mutual sliding in two conjugate directions, the elements can also execute a rotation around P. Th is rotation is called the structural rOlation U (positive counter-ctockwisc, see Fig. 7), The indication 'structural' was proposed to tbe Author by D rescher in order to distinguish 0 from the well-known material rotation W. which is delined by w- i(V' .$ - V•. ,) and represents Ihe rotation of the total material as observed from the outside. U creates additional velocity gradients of the
r,=
v..(- U;
Vu - O;
V: .• _ _ U ;
V•.• - O
Combi ni ng these results gives the slTain rale components, which are V(.(
+
Vu Ve.•
v.,. - (0' + bO) sin 9 v.,. - + h sin (m (0
0
O )
} 9)
(9)
- (0 0 - h O) cos (m - 0)
+ V•.(
and the rale of material rOlalion, which is
v..(- V:.• -
- (0
0
-
b cos 9 + 20 .. 2w O )
( 10)
49
ELASTO-PLASTIC VERSION OF DOUBLE SLIDING MODEL
539
Equation (10) shows Ihe differen~ belwC<.:n maleria! rotation", and the structural rotation a. Wl>cn only sliding oo::u rs and the elements themselves do not rotate. so that a ", 0, Ihe total soil body nevertheless appears to rotate, in the case when is not equal 10 b*. For example, when is larger than b*. the soil gives the impression of rotating clockwise, because '" is negative. Henoe the material rotation '" may consist of two parts. One componcnt is the effect of unequal shear strain rates. a' '" b' ; lbe other component a is due to rotation of the structure, i.e. of the clements betwC<.:n the sliding planes.
,,*
,,*
Dilalancy rclolioo
The anglc of dilatancy v" is defined by sin v' - (V:.!
+ V•.• )/W!.! -
v. .• )
(11)
where II(.! and V•.• are the lincar sirain rates of lines in the principal stress directions. Using equations (9) we find that sin v" _ sin Olsin (:z.:. - 8)
( 12)
This relation is independent of the shear strain rates ,,' and b'. Equation (12) gives for a fixed value of y' a set of possible combinations for the values of" and O. Thermodynamic reqllirem£nt
of e~rgy
dissiptllioo In Ihe double sliding model it is assumed Ihat a' can differ from b' . This is due to the principle in plasticity that . at failure. the strain rates are not bounded in magnitud e- they can have any value. So also in the two conjugate directions they can have unequal values. The shear strain rates (1* and b' arc only bounded by the requirement that the laws of friction are not violated. This would oo::ur if the sliding directions were opposed to the shear stresses on the sliding planes. Considering Fig. S it is seen that a' and b' , as defined in Fig. 6, should be positive in order that the directions of the forces on the saw tC<.:th correspond to the sliding directions. So the requirement on the shear strain rates is (13) and this is called the thermodynamic requirement of energy dissipation. Mathematically it is possible to show that (a" + b' ) cannot be negative. The stronger requirements (13) are dictated by the above mentioned friction character of the system.
50
PLASTIC CONSTITUTIVE EQUATIONS The expressions (9) for the strain rates ca n
serve as constitutive equations for the plastic slage of deformation. However. before they can be used, the angles II. 0 hue to be replaced by the material properties 4>. ~" . For this replacemen t, equations (4) and (12) are available. Of these, (4) contains the force inclination angle ;:, which can be eliminated by using the rules of friction to guarantee thaI the shear resistance is exhausted on the surfaces of the teeth. This point is elaborated in Appendix I, leading to equations (76). Using these in equations (9) results in the following plastic constitutive equations
(Y:., + V•..,)" (Y:.! - V•. .,)" -
+(a' +(01'
+ b' ) cos 4> sin · · IF + b' ) cos ~/F
(11( .• + V•.cl' - -(a" -b' )sin
~ COS
I
(14)
.' /F
where F' _ I - sin' 4> sin' y ' and the superscript p denotes plastic. Although not belonging to the plastic constit utive equations proper, equation ( 10) for the rotation can be added to complete the system. giving
(v..! - VI.,) -
-(a ' - b' ) cos
y' /F + W
- 2m (IS)
This is not a constitutive relation since the principle of objectivity prohibits a relation containing rotations to be conslituti~. It is added here b«
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
de JOSSEll N
SECTION 2 ELASTIC PART OF THE ELAST()'PL.ASTIC DSFR MODE L
In the clastic-plastic DSFR model the strain rates that are imposed by the boundary conditions are divided into an elas tic part and a plastic part. The plastic part consists of strain rates that obey rel ations (13) and (14) when Ihe material is in the limit stress slate. The remaining part is taken account of by Ihc elastie stress rates. Wilen the stresses are not at the limit Slate the plastic part vanishes, i.e. a- _ 0, b" _ 0, and the enti re strain rates are accounted for by an clastic res ponse to the stress rates. Th e elastic part is dcveloped as follows.
x_axi!l., posit ive coun ter-clockwise. The variablc I canno t be negat ive. These quantities a re shown in Fig. 8, where", is shown with the nega tive value, occurring in th e case of the sim ple shear test considered in th is Paper. The Coulomb-Mohr limi t condition is adopted, with limi t lines at an angle,p to the cr'-axis. Cohesion is assumed to be zero for sim pl icity; the limit lines pass through the origio of the o. r diagram. In terms of I the limit condition is expressed as follows. (II) The material behaves elaslically
whenO ';;I<ssin4>,or
)
t_ssi n ,p and i< 'ssin4>
(17)
then a" ... b" ... O. STRESS ST ATE AND L.IM IT STR ESS STATE Under pl ane strain condi tions in the (x,
u..
Yr
directions. the normal effective stress is a prin cipal stress and inlermedia te belwee n the two principal effective stresses in the (x, yrplane. All derivatives in the z-directi on are zero. Thc norm al effective stresses u. cr'n are taken to be positive for compression~ In order to abbrevialc the notation, the variables $, I, ~ are introduced, such that cr'~~-J-lcos2t/1
a.. - a,~ - - I sin 21/1
) (1 6)
(b) The material behaves elastO-p/aslically
whenl _ ssin4>andi .. jsin ,p } then a"
~ Oand
pta""s
"E:"--f"~-+- "
,y•• ~ .! - icos2"'+lsin 21/1{2"')
)
a., _ a" ~ - i sin 21/1 - t cos 21/1 (2,) a~, _ j + r cos 21/1 -I sin 21/1 (2 ~)
(19)
where a dot represe nts the lime derivative dldT. Wilen rotations or the material are invo lved. the objective co-rota tional (bumann) stress rat es H'.. ... etc. are required. These are related to the time derivatives a~• ... etc. by replacing by (2", - 2w) where w is the material rotation.
f
",
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
(IS)
~ O.
Siress rilles Considering s. I and", as time dependent variables, the e~ pressions (16) become, when differentiated with respect to time
6~ .
POl. fo<
b"
;'
2'"
'.,
' ...
",
I 51
'"
ELASTO-PLASTIC VERSION OF OOUB LI': SLIDING MODEL
l
They are given by
3;,. .. . -iCOli21/1 + l sin21/1(2~-Uu) ' ., .. I,. ~ - i li n 21/1- 1cos 2+ (~- Uu) f" .. . + f cos 21/1 - 1lin 21/1 (2~ - Uu)
The dasto-pl astic concept is that in the li mit stress state. as defined by relalioM ( 18). the total strain rates. as determined from boundary condi. tions. are divided into cl as tic and pl as tic parts sllCh that the plastic consti tutive equations {I 3), (1 4), (IS) are satisfied in the first place. The remainin g part of the strain rates is elastic a nd obeys equations (2$). The total itrain rates arc the .um of elastic and plastic parts as follows
.r v,..r cos 21/1
- (V•.• - V•. J" sin
(25)
In the last upre:ssion wfrom equations (2Q) is replaced by the structural rotation 0 defined by equation (15). The reason is that the rotation which has to be introduced in the co-rotational stress rate formulation must renect the rotation of the mate ria l that deForms elasticall y. In the elasto- plastic version of the DSFR model it is the elements between the sliding plsnes that deform elastically. Thus. only their rotation. i.e. the structural rOlation O. has to enter in the corotational formulation and not the material rotation W. which contains an apparent rota tional part. when ",. is unequal to b· .
v•.
(V(.( + V•.• ), - + (V•.• +
v..,Y -
2v)jG
sin /(I/O
ELASTQ-PLASTIC DSFR MODEL
v..: ...
(Ve.e -
.r" H
(21)
where the supcl'$Cri pt c denotes clastic. The terms t...; V• .: ' V.: are the utension rates (V•. • + is the shea r strain rate y.;. 'fhe shear modulus G is related to the modulus of elasticity E and Poisson's ratio Y in the usual way hy 0 _ Eta, 1 + v). The minus signs arise from the soil ltlC('hanies sign oonvention. from the velocity gradients etc. the lIrain ratel in the principal stress directions ( . " (which are rotated by ~ with respect to "', y) are obtained from the following relations
EIIlIlidlY AhhougJ! perfect elasticity is not a good appro~imation for soils, it is adopled here for convenience because the formulation of elastic stress·strain rela tions is well known and undis· puted. It reduces the validi ty of the modd con· sidered here to situations where the clastic strai n ratel are smaJi compared with tbe plastic strain
- (V•.• + V•. J
l
In the limit relatioM (18) apply and the elastic constitutive equations become
Equations (26) apply for a poi nt in (x. y) where t he stress state (in the limit) is kno wn. Th is means t hat ' and 21/1 are given quantities. The question is tben 10 establish how tbe tOial strain rates will change the SirCS'l state in the course of time. i.e. how large j and 2; are. when V(.( . .. etc. are given. The first two relations of (26) give ! uplicitly and W can be eliminated From the lasl two. So there remai n two equat ions for the three unknowns 2~, a· , bO • Additional information is given by the requirements ( I) whiCh st ate that the shear strain rates /I . and b· cannot become
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
542
do JOSSELIN lie JONG
vertex V of the cone lies in the horizontal plane for i(a;.. + <1;,.> - O(see Fig. 9~ STRAIN RATE SPACE
Fie. 9. SI.- Spil~ orilb limh ~ negative. So there are two equations and two inequalities for damnining three unknowns. This is an unusual system. Vermeer (1980) proposed 10 solve for the unknowns by requiring tile rale of elastic energy diliSipalion 10 be a minimum. The corresponding procedure is examined mathematically in Appendix 2. Since that an al ysis is rather complex, it is perhaps helpful to present the pr~urc vis ually by means of VC(:IOrs in the stress and strain spaces in the following sections.
STRESS SPACE
The stress space is defined by three perpendicular axes, which have as co-ordinates: !{o:" + 17~) vertical; !(u''1 - 0:.) and " .. _ <1" horizontal (see Fig. 9). A pomt P in this space represents a stress slatc. II is located in a homontal plane at a height s, at the end of a radius vector of length I rotated through an angle 20/1, This corresponds to equations (1 6). In this stress space the variables s, 1,20/1 arc in fact <;:ylindrical co-ordinates. In time, the stress point P moves through the stress space and ill path is called Ihe stress path. The malerial rcac:hes the limit stress state when the stress point reaches the limit cone. This cone CUIS Ihe horizontal (f. 2~) oo-ordinate plane in a circle with radius "100" - J sin I/J. Therefore, the semj-verte~ angle of the limit cone has a magni_ tude of arctan (sin I/J). When cohesion is zero, the
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
In a similar manner it is possible 10 define a strain rate space with orthogonal co-ordinates: (Y•. • + v,,,l vt:rtical, (Y•.• - v,.,) and (Y•.• + V•••J horizontal. Vectors in this space represent strain rates. Fig. \0 shows su<;:h an cum pIe. The origin of the strain rate space is U5ua11y placed at the stress point P of the stress space, wherever P may be located temporarily. Corresponding stress and strain rate axes are oriented para11el but opposite in dire(:tion because of the sign convention adopted for the stresses. Figure \0 demonstrates the combination of stress and strain rate spaces. Point V is Ihe origin or the stress space and the VC'TIe~ of the limit cone. Point P is the current stress point. Since it lies on the limit conc, this figure represents a limit stress state in which the strain rate consists of a combination of elastic and plastic pariS. This strain rate is plotted as the veclor PQ in the strain rate space with P as origin. It is shown how Ihis PQ is decomposed into its plastic and elastic parts, respectively PR and RQ, It is assumed here that PQ is a veclor of known magnitude and direction. In the horirontal plane through P the axes (Y(,{ - y•.• ). (V:., + Y•. () are shown. According to equalions (22) Inese are rOtaled through 21/1 wilh respect to (V•.• - v,.,l. (V•. , + Vr.• ). They are therefore respeclivt:ly collinear with, and ptTpCn. dicular 10, the I co-ordinate of the stress space. In Fig. \0 the f co-ordinate is divided by the shear modulus G in order thai Ihe stress rates correspond to the elastic strain rales (set' equalions (24)). In the vertical direction the s coordinate hll$ to be adjusted by a faclor (I - lvi/G. By Ihis adaptation of the stress space. Ihe elastic part of the strain rate veo:.:tor coincides with the tangent to the stress path. The adapted limit stress cone is more obtuse; its vene~ angle is equal to arctan (sin I/J/( l - lv)). The stress path through P cannot trespass outside the limit cone. When the material deforms plastically it will remain in its tangent plane, So the elastic pan of the strain rate is a vector paralic! to the plane, Ihat is tangential 10 Ihe adapted cone in P. A vector in Ihis tangenl plane consists of two components: one is in the direclion of the line connecting P to the cone vertex; Ihe other is tangential to the circular eross-section of Ihe cone. The fint may be called the !-component, because only s changes when the stress path has Ihat direction; the second is the .).-(:Omponent, because I{I changes along it.
53
,....
de JOSSELIN de SONG
P!~" .
",.ugh Q p.,.II.1
I. I h. to ng,Bt pl.n. in
~11' 12. Sln i" rale • ...,. for .ilotu l .........
Iid''''' (."",,,, PQ of Im&t~ ~
\0 Ihe left of R•. Decomposing PR YcdoriaUy in directions at angle 4> would gi~ a component R. R in Ihe negative b-direction producing a negative value for b. This is not allowed by the thermodynamic requirement of energy dissipation (13). Instead PR is the vectorial addit ion of the vcdors PRo and R. R, where R. R is a "'-component. Before sllowing lhis it is necessary 10 return to Fig. 10. A case (ii) is shown. wilerI' PQ represents the known lolal strain rate. It is composed of a plastic part PR in the horizontal plane and an elastic pari RQ in the plane through Q paral1c1lo the tan~nl plane through P. The point R lies on Ihe intersection line of these Iwo planes. The requirement of minimal elastic work is satisfied when Q R is the smallest distance between Q and Ihe intersection line, So the conslruction of R is 10 proje<:1 Q perpendicularly on to that line. In Fig. 10 the projection R of Q lies belwccn R. and R,. So a case (ii) is involved and PR can be decomposed inlo two positive shear strain rates .. and b. [n thaI case the clastic stress path of P. being parallel to RQ, consists only of an scomponent Pointing downwards it means that ! decreases in the course of time.
Diwta"t or cOMlr=l i"" behauiour
In Fig. 12 the material i$ contractive, i.e. wit h a negative angle of dilatancy v". According to eq uations (14) the plastic shear strain rates a", b" produ« vectors that al"(: located in the plane R. " PR, " at an angle arctan (sin v") with the horizontal plane. This plane may be called the plan e of the " ", b" shearings. Since v" is negative
54
is .'nin
r
..Ie i........lMd simple shnr IISI)
tile plane tilts upwards, i.e. in the negative (v.;.~ + V•.J-dircction. The shear strain rate .." prod uces II vector along PR." and b" along PR, ", but unfortunalely these: ve<:tors do not have the lengtlls of a" and bO. II is the proje<:lions PRo and PRo of Ihese lines, in the horizontal plane, tllal lIue lengtlls u" and b", respectively. This follows from the last two lines of equations (14) because F defined tllere satisfies F ' ... cos1 4> + sin' 4> cos ' v". Tile apex angle of triangle R. PR, has a magnilude of 2 arctan (tan '" cos va). In Fig. 12 the strain rate, imposed on tile material in the undrained simple shea r test. is sllown. It is, as demonstraled in Ihe seclion below, tile ve<:tor PQ of length P in tile negative (V•. , + V, .•}-dirCClion. In order to de<:omposc PQ inlo plastic and elastic parts, Ihe plane is drawn through Q, parallei lo the tangent plane in P, and the intersection line R, "R.- R" of this plane with the tihed plane for .. ", b" shearings i$ constructed. To determine a O, b" it is then necessary 10 proje<:t R. · and R, " on tbe horiwntal plane. This leads to complicated mathematical expressions, since planes at different angles are involved in this procedure. The formulae arc somewhat simplified in the sections below and Appendix 2 by calling M", N° the co-ordinales of point R in the hori~onta] plane, sucb thai M " ... PT and N" ... TR. In Fig. [2 a situation is shown where the poi nt R" lies outside the allowable range R.-R, " and ils projection R outside the range R. R,. This situation resembles Fig. ] lib) and is accordingly called a case (iii). Minimal e]astic work is produced when tile clastic strain rate vector is the shortest distance from Q to the allowable range R.- R.". III this
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
Et.ASTo-Pt.ASTIC VE I'.SION OF DOlI 8I.E SUDING MOOEl
case the veclOr QR, ' is the shortest distanOl.: and so R, ' Q is the elastic part of the strain rate. The plastic part is the ve.:tor PR, ' and thai means that only the shear strain mode a' is active and b" _ O. How this decomposition may be derived mathematically is shown in Appendix 2. The clastic ,-cctor R, "Q can be decomposed into a ~-compon ent R, "R" and an $-component R' Q. Th e !,/I-component is in the nega tive (V( .• + Y.,.(rdirection. which according to the last line of equations (25) produOl.:s a negative (2';' - 2U). The s-component is downward. which means a decrease of s in the course of time. The vector R. · Q is parallel to the tangent of the stress path in P. That path is consequently a downward turning hc1icalline on the cone surface. SECTION J EXAMPLE O F UN DR AINED SIMPLE SHE AR TEST
The und rained simple shea r test is used here as an eumple to show how the elasto·plastic DS FR model predicts stress paths. The deformations in a simple shear test can be considered to be homo· geneously distributed over the sample, when the deformations are not too large. This leads to simple equ ations for the imposed strain ra tes and d05Cd analytic solutions for the stress paths. Figure 13 shows a typical result of a stress path plotted from such a solution. The heavy line is the path of the stress point, representing the elfe.:· li.·e stresses on horizontal planes, as traced in the Mohr diagram. Initially the prin· cipal stresses arc vertical and hori~ontal, equal respectively to q, and q • . These form the initial eonditions. The stress point is in Po. The dottcd initial stress circle is smaller than the limit circle. So the test starts with an clastic stage. In this prefailure stage the Moh r circles remain concentric. but expand, and the stress point moves vertically upwards. The end of the elastic and beginning of the
0;,. 0,.
545
plastic stage is at P, when the corresponding stress circle touches the limit lines. Aner P , the sample behaves plastically: aU stress circles remain tangential to the limi l lines. During the plaSlic stage the total strain rates consist of a plastic part and an elastic part The magnitude of the plastic shear strain rates u· and b' is determined in su~h a way that the remaining elastic strain rates dissipate a minimum amount of energy. Applying the procedure developed in Appendix 2 leads us to idelllify three cases, called respectively case (ii), case (iii) and case (i~). The location of P I on the limit stress circle determines which of those cases is occurring. The relevant regions are indicated in Fig. 13. In all three cases thaI part of the total strain rates which produces volume ch anges, is taken account of by an elastic reduction of the effecti,·e stress level. The model is assumed 10 be contrac· tive (negative dilatant} Since the test is undrained, the volume remains constant and the porewater pressure increases !o prevent the sam ple from contractin g. Aecordingly. the effective st ress level reduces in the course of time, causing the stress path to tum left. Case (ii) is obtained when P , lies on the middle arc of aperture 2;$. where ;$ is an au~iliary angle characteristic for the simple shear test. defined by equation (40). In case (ii) both o' and bO will develop. The non-coaxiality occurring in this case is uniquely determined by the ini tial stresses q" q•. The stress pat hs during the plastic stage arc straight lines (see Fig. 17). Case (iii) is involved when P I lies on the right· hand arc of aperture {!n - ;$~ Then only a ' ·type sliding occurs and b" _ O. The sliding planes are vertical. This leads to a toppling bookrow me.:ha· nism. The solution for s as a function of 21/1 leads to curved stress paths from which one example is shown in Fig. 13. More curves of this family are given in Fig. 18. In case (iii) q, is larger than q.' an ini tial situation which may be called active. The apparent angle of internal friction is smaller than ,p.
Case (iv) arises when PI lies on the left-hand arc of aperture (ilt -~. Then Q ' _ 0 and only b' -type slidi ng ocx:urs, with horizontal sliding planes. The apparent angle of internal Friction is almost equal to 4>. In this case q. < q. initially. a situation that may be termed passive.
When the sample is completely saturated the pore water prevents volume changes. In the simple shear apparatus a plane strain condition in the .-direction is maintained. Then the sample cross-section in the (x, y).plane conserves its area, while deforming from a rectangle into a paraUelogram {see Fig. 14). The deformation is assumed to be homogeneously distributed over the sample. Then the upper plane remains horizontal and keeps its height, II. Let the velocity of the upper plane be tJ towards the left. The velocity components of points in the sample are then given by '"
- fly;
V, - 0
with
tJ > 0
(28)
In this analysis tJ is taken to be positive and furthermore it is independent of x and y because of the assumed homogenei ty of the deformation. The minus sign allows us to compare the computed stress paths in the Mohr diagram with the test results in Figs I and 20 (taken From Wroth e t aI.) and this is an advantage. A disadYantage is that negati~ values of 21/1 ocx:ur in the analysis below. The terms that represent the velocity gradients v, .• - iJ V)iJx ... etc. are Obtained by partial differentiation of V, and V, with respect to x and y. It follows thai VK•K - V, .K -
v,., - 0;
-tJ
V•• , '"
(29)
The major principal direction of the strain rates accordingly makes an angle 0 with the x-&xi&, where tanU! _ V,. ,+
V... i.e.
56
0 ...
v,.• _
v,..
-ill
~.{+v. .• - O
}
~. ~- V... ... - tJsin2\1i
(3 1)
V~ .• + V•. c - -tJcos21/1
IMPOSED STRAIN RATES IN UNDRAINED SIMPLE SHEAR TEST
VK
The combinations (22) and (23) of the strain rates in the principal stress di re.::lions (~, 'I) are given by
-ct).
' (JO)
v•. ~-v~ .. .. tJ ... 2W Comparing the abo~ results with tbe c0ordinates in Fig. 12, it can be seen that the strain rate vedor imposed on the material in the undrained simple shear test is the vector PQ of length tJ.
'"ifial romliflollS At time T ... To the test starts. At that mom ent tbe principal effective stresses are vertical and horizontal. They are positive and called respectively q, and q. (su Fig. 14~ So the initial stress state is given by
ELASTIC STAGE
In the beginning the material is elutie and the gradients from equations (29) are
~locity
V~.~· '" V,.K" - V,.: - 0;
VK.: -
- tJ
(JJ)
Then equations (2 1) give
3'",, '" 3', , '" 0;
a., ... a,. ... tJo
In order to simplify' the presentat ion, the corotational stress rates
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
547
EL\STO-PI.ASTtC VERStON OF OOUIII..E SU OtNG MODEl..
201 exceeds
2w by a factor of the order of (v /s). Disregarding 2W com parod wilh 2~ is reasonable wilen v is large oompa red willi the effective stress level s. The simplified equations are oT,. - <7'lI'- O;
i1 .,_i1,. _pv
Considering the second of equa tions (35), the
values of til mentioned above are accounted for by the expression
2tJi ... -
lJ( + arcsin
[!(q. - q.)/f]
(36)
where I is limited by relations ( 17) 10 the values
End of clastic 11IId beginning of plastic $Iage (34)
JT.PVdT -
pG(T - To)
It follows from the constancy of 0;., that the stress path in Fig. 13 is a venical st raIght line. In tile co-rotational solution it is sligh.tly curved to tile right. From equations (34) and ( 16) it follows that
I 005
s - so - t(q.+q.) 21/1 - !(q. - q. )
1
(35)
$, - so ~ t
21/f, - t
Sill
21/1, - -PG(T, - To)/s, SIn~)
Sin
~
1
(31)
Equati on (36) then becomes
I sin 21/1 ... - PG(T - To) Figures 15(a) and 15(b) show tile behaviour of the stresses in tile elastic stage. In Fig. l5(a) an active initial stress st ate is shown, where q, > q•. The principal stresses tum clockwise, i.e:. ~ < o. The angle"", is initially zero and enters the region between 0 and -ill. Figure l 5(b) shows a passive initial stress stale. where q, < q.. The principal SlTesse! turn oounter-clockwise, i.e. ~ > O. T he angle >/I starts from - til and enters the rt:gion between - t,. and - i ll. In the Moh r diagram the pole for planes is indicated, and tl\.( heavy line is the stress path foro'"., 0, • •
,., Fi&-
At time T, the elastic stage ends. The point for • in Fig. 13 has reached P" the stress point for which the accompanyi ng stress circle touches the limit linc. Then from relations (18)1, equals s, sin ~ and the stress stale characteri~ by s" !/I , is from equations (35)
0;. ... 0
21/1, - -tll+arcsin(
q. - q~
(q.+qJSIII ~
) (3S)
SECTION 4 PLASTI C STAGE
After T, Ihe material behaves e1asto-plastically and the equations developed in Appendix 2 are then appl icable. These are expressed in terms of the quantities M- and N · defined by equations (19) and (SO). Using equation (3 1) with I/I - !/I, at
'"'
t5. S t _ i. eluti< SI.p: (.) ..aniDg from .<"Iin milial ........ Ie, f, > f •• (.) ".ni",
from"";n inili.I ......... e, f, <
f.
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
57
548
... IOSSEUN "" JONG
w,.{" V'l..'1l VI&- I &. Dmil or 1'",. 11 ~
time
7;
cancttr orallXiliarJ alllle.
these quantities art: in the beJinning or
the phlSti(: .tage
M · __ 8sin~,
(1~2') .
(1 - 2v + 51"
~
sm VO)
I
(39)
N° . +(Jcos'4t, At Ihis point it is convenient tn introduce an HllAili.ry angle ~ defined by
tan ~ _ tan ~ cos , ,"(1 - 2v) (I 2v + sin !/l sin . oJ
,"utu. In FiJ. 16, which il1ultC:ll<'S. par' of Fill12, it is t ile angle betwocn PT and the Lines PQ.
and PQ•. Fun ner, it redll(Z$ tn '" in the 1'11'11'1_ dilala nl case when v· _ O. Using this angle f 11K: .ariables M O and N ° rrom eql,lalions (39) are
-p sin 2t/t,
Ian f /lan ~ COl v· }
EJf«litoe Sl ress/evtl Aocord ing to equa tion (77) of A ppend i~ 2, it is found from equations (3]) and (40) that for the undrained simple shear tcst 6
1_ - "G
(40)
The all.mary angle. has 1'11'1 special meaning, but is used here because il simplifies the mathematieal
MO_
the thrcc remaining cases (ii), (iii) and (iv) di stinguished in Appendi~ 2. On ly!. the rate of the effective Itres5level S, is the same (or all thrcc.
(41)
N° . +(Joos21/1,
sin 2", tan ~ tan v' (I
Since sin 2. is negative at time T, > To (equations i has the si gn of p', the angle of dilatancy. When the material il contractive, v' is negative and so the effective stress level reduces in the course of time . The relevant parameters "., b', 20/1 differ for the three different cases. 37)~
CASE (ii)
When II., q. sat isfy the inequalit ies
and the combinations (M " Ian ~ COl . " ± N °) which arc of particular significanoc in AppendiJ: 2
- liin ~ " (q. - qJ/(q.
+ q.).in "',;;sin.
(44)
the value of 2., is (aocord inl to equation (38)) limited by
OR
- ~1I - J:"2",, "- ~1I +~
As sin 21j1, is negative (equations (37)) MO (equations (39)) is always pmitive here. This means (sec Appendix 2) that cue (i) docs nnt occur. Af\;cr T, the material behavcs differently in
58
(43)
2v) tan '"
(4S)
and this implies that - I ~ fin ~L . . -cos ~ and -sin ~ .. cos ~L .. sin~. CODliidenng equations (4 1) it is found thai M ' , N° sa tisfy the inequalities
M ' tan
"'_COS p ' > Psin~}
(<6)
-P sin 4> .. N" " Psin 4>
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
549
ELASTO-PL\STIC VERStON OF OOUBLE SLIDING MODEL
So the condition of equation (85) is satisfied and a case (ii) OC\:Ur$.
a/a o, bO, ¥ in ca.se (ii) When case (ii) oc:o::urs the plastic behaviour is dC5Cribcd by equation (89~ Using equations (42) the strain rates are Val~i'J
" - +#=('.,+<11 )<
b' _
F/2 cos ,p Sln,p cos
} VO
-P cos (2!/-, -,p) F/2 cos,p Sin .p cos I"
(47)
)<
Considering relatioos (45) it is verified that both aO. bO are non-negative and that therefore the thermodynamic requirements (1 3) are satisfied. The last line of equations (89) requires 2,), to be equal to 2D and this latter can be determined by the use of the last lines of equations (26~ (31) and (47), giving
Po + cos 2\f1,/'sin,p) (48) This shows that ~ is of the order of t/. Equation (43) shows that .i' is of the order tIC. Since: j is 2D ... 2,), _
negative and s red uces in time. its total change will be smaller than s. So PG(T - T,) < $ and the total change of 2!/- will be of the order s/ C which is assumed to be small. In orde r to simplify the analysis, 2,), will be taken to be zero. This means that 2!/- remains constant and equal to 2+, in the plastic stage. As a consequence the stress paths are straight lines dire<:ted towards the origin in the Mohr diagram. A family of these case (ii) curves is shown in Fig. 17.
Nan-<:oaxlalily il! Caire U') From equation (30) the angle 0 bctwcc:n the x·axis and the major principal dire<:tion of the strain rale tensor equals - ill. The angle belwcc:n
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
the x-a~is and Ihc minor principal compression stress is 1/1. Th e angle of non-c:oa:c.iality (which was called I in previous work) is therefore gi.'en by 1- 0- '" ... - h - "'. Usi ng equatioo (38) it is deduced that sin 21
=
- cos 2", _ - cos 21/1,
- - (q. - q.)/(q. + qJ sin !/J
(49)
This shows that the non·coa~iality {in case (ii) plaslic behuiour, is uniquely determined by the inilial principal stresses q., q• . Coa~iality (i.e_ ; _ 0) is to be expecled only in the special case when q. '" q., i.e. thai the inilial principal stresses are equa l (indicated in Fig. 17 by an arrow). An e~pression for; in terms of the shear strain rates 0 °, bO is found by the use of equations (78), (8 1) and (41). Since (2,), - 20) is zero in c~ (ii). il is found thaI
As 2; _
~ tlt
- 2+,
it follows that
Ian 21 ... tan ,p(bO- a°)l(aO + bO) This relation reduces for the case of volume conserving non-dilatancy 10 the ....ell_kno .... n tan 21 _ tan .p(b - a)j(a + b)
Apparent u"yle a/lnterllal/ricllan i" case (ii) From Fig. 17 the stress paths for a,.,- <1 • • are straight lines towards the origin. These suggest apparent angles of internal friction,p, defined by tan!/J. -
.,.. ;=""'21/1"." a,., - :S-+c':I'ocos
... - sin'" sin 21/1/ 1 + sin !/J
~os
21/1
In this case 2", is constant and equal to 21/1,. Furthermore, 2!/-, can (depending on q., qJ have any value l)etwcc:n (- til -,p) and (- t .. +!/J)
59
550
(see relations (45)). Therefore tan !fir can have values between
tan <1>. - sin 4> CQ$
~J(1 + sin sin,p)
}
and
(SO)
Ian <1>, - sin cos ,pj(1 - sin
sin .$)
for v' _ 0, ,p _ <1>. and these values for 1/>, cone· spond to the prediction mentioned earlier (de Josselin de Jon8, 1972). By using equation (38) it is possible 10 expres5
the apparent angle of internal friction in tenns of q• • q. only. showing the important influence of Ihe initial tlOriZonlal stress on the lest results. When q• • q. satisfy the inequal ities
I~
value of
2J/f,
+ qJ sin <
I
(5 1)
ds
VO
cos I/> sin.$
s dT
(56)
Since the variables 5 and 2", are separated. each side can be integrated dire<:tly, giving - cos,p log (cos (21/I - ,p)) .. ( I - 2v)
cot cos
VO
.
4> sIn
+ 2t/1
sin ,p
:t log s + const. (57) '+'
log [:s
(~~' - t)] + 2t.t/I -
", IJ tan
.p
is, according \0 equation (38).
limited by
_ (1 _ 2v) ( - ill
+ ~ < 21/1, < 0
and thi s implies Ihal -cos sin ,p < cos 2t/1, < ].
,p < sin 2JI., < 0
(52)
and
Considering equations (41) it is found that MO, N ° then satisry the inequalities MO lan cos v' <
Psin ,p
N*>$sin,p Therefore the condition (86) is satisfied and case (iii) occurs. Vlllues 0/11°, bO, It in cIISe (iiI) W~n case (iii) oox:urs, the plastic behaviour is described by equations (90). With MO, N° given by equations (41) the st rain rates are
aO _ - $ sin 2", tan ,pFlsin 4> cos VO} bO _ 0
(53)
This is single sliding behaviour. , b" in the last of equaUsing these values of aO tions (26~ with 2W _ Pfrom (31~ gives 20 - /1(1 - sin 2", tan ,p/sin 1/» > 0
(54)
The last of equations (90) with MO, N° from equations (41) gives
2.j, - - /1(G/s ) cos (2", - cos.p (SS) In this expression 20 is disregarded compared with the other tcrms, because 2Q is of the order (sl G) smaller. Solution/or tlw Sl rtS3 pIIlru in CaM ( iii) In order to establ ish 2", as a function of time, equation (55) has to be integrated. This is.
60
(1 - 2v) cot
sin 2", d(21/t) cos (2)J- .$) dT
Determining the integration constant by using the bound ary conditions at T, gives the solu tion
CASE (iii), ACTIVE CASE
sin,p < {q. - q.)J(q.
however. not possible dire<:tly, because this expression contains also the variable s. Elimination of p with equation (43) produces the following differential equation
00"·II cos 4>.log [";] q. + q
. cos 4> SIO
(58)
where y" given by equation (38) is a function of q•• q. alone. The stress paths for "'~r 0 . . of Fig. 18 are plotted from this solution, usi ng equation (16) with t .. 5 sin 4>. The material constants are taken to be 1/> - 23· : vo _ -3·; {1-2v) _ (}1. These values give ,p ... 28·05" (equation (40)). Curves have been drawn for (q.!qJ - I·45; 1·7; \·96; 2·28, which correspond to 2t/1, '" -6 1·95" ; - 48·S"; - 33·5'; 0" respectively. Apparent angle o/internal/rielion
As shown by equation (55) 2~ vanishes for 2", _ - !I! +,p. So the curves of Fig. 18 approach this value asymptotically and the curve for 11;, - -!n +,p, which is a straight line, is tlK:ir asymptole. The apparent angle 4>. then has the value tan 4>. '" - sin 4> sin 2",,/( 1 + sin 4> cos 2\11,) ... sin 4> cos ,p/(l
+ sin 4> sin ,p)
(S9)
This is one of the limits for 4>. in case (ii) (see equation SO)). Toppling boolcrow medumiSlll
The plastic behaviour in all case (iii) situations is the toppling book row me<:hanism. This can be seen as follows. According to relation (5 1) the inilial slress sta tes in case (iii) are active. q. > q. and so Fig. 15(a) applies to them. Since bO '"' 0, only /1 0 sliding occurs (see equations (53)). Comparison with Fig 3(a) shows that then only verli_ cal sliding planes develop. This corresponds to Fig. 2.
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
EU.STO-PLASTIC VERSION OF DOU BLE SLI DING MODEL
+ ,
: tos. iii ; .-.
~
P...i ...
l_, - - - - - - - - ~. ~
:;-
r--
'"
T ' , ~.
• G'
.:: q~
,, "
, "'
,, , " ~
.'
-o,! •
-(}2 -
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
61
552
de JOSSELIN de: lONG
Furrhennorc, the structural rotation
a
given
by equation (54) is positive, because sin 20/1 is ini-
1;ally nega tive according to relation (52) and does not change sign afterwards. This means a countcr . dockwisc rotation of the sliding clements as indicated in Fi g. 2. It might be noted that the structural rotation
a
is opposed to the principal stress rotation ~. [n equation (55) eos (20/1 - ~) is positive for 2"', li mited by equation (52) causing 2~ to be negative to start with. The principal stresses start 10 rotate clockwise and con tinue to do so thereafter. This falsifies the postulate that structural rotation and principal stress rotation arc 10 be identified. CASE (iv), PASSIVE CASE
When q,. q. satisfy the inequal ities
- ] < (q. - q.)/(q.
+ II.) sin 4> <
- si n i> (60)
a case (i v) situation occurs. An analysis similar to that for ca.'lC (iiil gives the resul ts (1 .
...
0
- /1 SHi
}
4>FlSHI ~ cos y. (61) 2,), ... -t/(G/sl cos (21/1 + 4>l/SHI ~ cos 4> Th e solution for $ as a function of t/J. giving the b- ...
21/1 tan
stress paths., is cos (21/1, + 4>1] ". [ , .,. 1 cos ( '" + ",)
+ 2(1/1, -!/I) tan
-
~
(62)
Now 2,), vanishes for 2"' ... - ! .. - 4>. so the stress paths approach the line asymptotically al an angle ~r defined by tan ~r ... sin ~ cos
4>Jf. 1 -
sin
4» (63)
Since 4> differs only slightly from ~. the apparent angle of internal friction
Figures 17, 18 and 19 show the families of stress paths in undrained simple shear tests for hypothetical samples that o bey the laws of the
62
co ntractive elasto-plastic DSFR model. The ma terial properties of the samples are the same and they have the same angle of internal frict ion ~. Their behavio ur differs in the tests and this is due only to the differences in their initial stresses. i.e. the ve rtical and ho rizontal normal stresses q, and q•. Co nsider for simplicity the stress paths marked by the arrows in Figs 17. 18 and 19. The marked curve in Fig. 17 starts with q. " q•. In Fig. 18 where q. > q., the ex treme active case is marked. In Fig. 19 Ihe ex treme passive case with q. < q. is mark ed. There is a remarkable resemblance between Ihese three curves and the test results from Ladd & Edgers (1972) reproduced in Fig. 20. In this figure the initial stresses are nOI indicated, but th e overoonsolida tion ratios of I. 2, 4 suggest that the three curves correspond to q. values that are, respecti vely, smaller than, equal to and larger than q •. The theoretical stress palhs start with vertical straight lines and have sharp be nds at the transi tion from elastic to plastic. This is due 10 Ihe oversimplification of perrect elasticity in the prefailure stage. Introducin g dilatancy and a gradual decrease or the shear modulus G may $Often the sharp bends. It was. however, not the objcctive of Ihis sludy to try 10 match leSI results by matching material properl ies. The purpose of this study was only to show Ihal the o rigin al, unaltered DSFR model, if e~tendcd 10 ils elasto-plastic version, predicts the unique failure behaviour observed and Ihal the chosen failure mode depends o n the initial Siress Slate. Beeau.'lC of the preponde rant influence of the ratio q) q., it seems evidenl that in Ihe e~eeu lion of simple shear tests th e horizontal stresses should no longer be disregarded .
APPENDIX I : DETERMIN ... TlON OF
The thrt:e parameters~. fl. 1 describe the geometry of the slid ing mechanism and the for= acting upon il. The equations devell>ped ;n sectil>n 1. ..clating th~ parameters tl> the prl>pertics ~, •• 1>1 the particle a~mbly as a whl>l., are equations (4) and ( 12) which repea ted are
h.,.
sin~ _ .i n(9+1I1sin (h _ (J _ l)
sin •• _ sin (Jlsin (2~ - (J)
(64)
(65)
T hese are onty IWI> equation. for solving for the three
unknown parameters a. 9.1 as functil>n. I>f~, ••. wh ~h an: material prl>pcrtiC$ I>bscrvable frl>m the I>u t, ide. The objettive I>f th. analy,is below is to show how ... (J. 1 can be dctennined by use nal infl>rmatil>n that the slKling mechanism is oound tl> I>bey the rules I>f friclil>n. In temt$ of the interparticle friction angle ~. thCS<' rutes are
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
EI..AS'TO-f'USTlC VEItSION OF DOUBLE SlIOINO MOOEl
fa) oIidina .... i11 0001 OOXUt .... hen .. is smalln Ih.n _. (b) $Iidinlcan oa:ur .... hm ;, C(jlll.b __ fe) il is impossible for l 10 ucced __ .
llId s'na: " .. 0 for l ... , Ihis gi'o"Cl, ";th
From . 11 sl;.Jin, &e<>tnelries havina value combinlliont of ... 9Ih.1 prod...,. ~o aocordinllO (6S~ only • particular tel of ... /I combin.lions Cln be Clpeded 10 be acli~. ThaI JlVUcuI.r H1 i. the sct WI introduced iIolO U1W1Uon (64) ai_lhc oo.cr.-cd value. rot. YIllue of .I. .... bich U1ual1 _ . However, .me.: l ClIIJK)( cuud _ •• Ibis tel of ... combinations is nOl allowed to I;OIItain values of l elccedina ••. This me:lIn. lit" .. oonYderul as • fllnction of ... 9 mll5t b.ve an utrcmc yal ... .l.,,_ which is a muimum, lhal l .... .. _ •. Elimination of 0 f'om U1ualions (64) and (6S) gi"ts
I
.""h
.... illt ...... (1
+sin.lin yO'+(lin
_+lin ."')COI h
("') '" h>- ,'
.-
.. {sin _
+ sio ."', + (I + lin 4> sill ."') 1>:11 2
.-
sin. _ -cos {h - 8)/1>:11/1
+ sin y' I+sin.sin.o
(7SI
In"erlion from Ih;1 relalion and U1l1ation (6S, Ji "ts Ihc followin,nprcuiOIlJ for 9 alld (2" - f1)
sin /I _ COl. s,n v' j F COl 9 _ COl ,oJF
sin (h - 9) _ COl _IF <XII(lo -
0) _
-an.
""
COl ,o/F
F' _ I _ sin' • sin'."'
(67)
(68)
i J/i2 _ 0 or II .. 0. Th;.
COl 2<1 _ _ sin -
v' ) lin 2a
t.
""
willt ~
+ sin 4> s;n
- ~(I
_
.O.n:
A muimum OOXUrl. when
Ji¥C1l by
AI " is Im.11er Ih.n til. this result IhOWI Ihll 1M MOOnd d~rivlI;YC is nqal've. So 1M solulion .I..".. .. 2a - 28 nprcscnll I maximum and this Illidies lbe rults 01 frif;!ion. IntroduciDI .1..,_ in oq .... cion (64)
This Jives .. as • fu.nction of ... In ts~bli"'in • .1..". by dilfcrmt.i:alion 01 U1 .... lion (66) ,,;11t rc:spccIIO", only II is. variable; the y,lues oI •• nd filed q.... nlilict.. Tlkin, the derivative Ihen givts (d;';,h)!col' A ... 2(sin 4> - lin . ' W",'
~
equalion (68)
(69)
APPEN DI X 2; DECQMPOSlTlON Of TOTAL STRAIN RATES INTO PLASTIC ANO ELASTIC PARTS Equalion. (26) (Jpress lhe componenll of the lo~1 SIRiIl rllts in IcmtI 01. "I. b'. J .nd Q~ The IInkllO"·n J (:In be Iound dircctly ftOll' tile lim lwo by eliminalion 01 (/I' + b O~ This Jiyts
(.J. _
j(l - 2. + lill • sin , O)iG •
-(Vt<
Rcpl8.;ernenl of . in ., sin y' by ..... of U1u. tiont (64) and (6S) giyts
+
v..• )+ (V•., -
v•.• ) sin . '
(77)
The connection of Ihi, ",Ialion .... ilh "ecIO .... in fia. 12 i, th. t Ih~ ri&hl-halld side divided by (I + lin 4> lin ,,O J (I - 2.) U1ual1 RRo, llIe vocnical componcnl of QR' • .... hich ;IXI( is parlllcl lO VP.
SoI
fl« - 28 - .., - 0
(10)
Since II cannOI be zero (In f ip).nd 4) lhe SOlution il
FtOII' lbe firll lWO 01 U1U.IKmI (26) it 1"0110'" lhal
(71)
This rault is U1l1ivaicnl 10 RO.... c·1 "'""' dilal./lt)' rd.· tion (1962~ III order to verify whC1Mr .1..". indeed produoes • mnimum, lhe KCOnd
I,,'
+ bO) cos . IF - ""
+
V•.• ) lin .
(71)
with
MO _ (VI!
(L
+ (VI-! - V,. ,~I - 2.) (79) 2.+sin_sin"')
lAt. q.... nl;ly N° be defined by
H' - -IV,., + V...I
'''''
The third ofUl .... tions (26) then Jives (a' sin _.,.,. vOj F
,,0,
f .. 2 (lin. AI •
is .hvay:tl
sin ,,0) cos'
lar., Ihan
J/""
.. H'
(71)
."'. / is posilive. The
wcolld derivative 01 A il
i'A
+ sin
4>(t/GX2~
- :w)
(81)
UsinlUlWIlionl (78) I nd (81) the war "rain ' i lts ,,0 .nd b O c:an UpressN;n lerms 01 ", 0 .nd H". Thcre
w
(($1I!It
ill
fI{
---/+,,112' II", d2
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
24' sin _.,.,. .o/F - sin ...J/GX21 - :W) _ Mo lID _ COl
,0+ N '
(82)
63
'"
is 2 an:tan (tan 4> cos y' ) the masnitude of N ' .... ith respect to M' Ian ~ COS y' determines how R i. 10C!ucd "ith respect to that trian&ic- The tbree different pos_ sibilities arc indicaled as cases (ii~ (iii) and (iv) in Fig. 2 1. They are a. fOlio ..... . (ii)
When R lies on th. section R, R. then
- M'
tan 4> cos
y' ..
N' "
M' tan 4> COS
y'
(85)
(iii) When R Ii .. to the left of R, then
N' > (iv)
+M ' tan~cosy'
N' < - M ' tan
~ Fil. 21. HoriJ.oalal ,..... of FiJ. 12, IbowiDg R in lho _ (I), (ii), (iii) aIM (iy) 2b' sin ~ co.
' "IF + .in
q.('IGK2~
_ M" Ian
Eliminalinl (aO - h O) between fourth of equations (26) gives
-
,.pons "r
20)
If> cos." -
eq~alion
N°
(83)
(81) and the
. in If> WG)(2¥ - 20) _ (20 - 2«» sin If> - N° (84) The quantities MO and N°, IJ defined by eq..ations (79) and (80~ are the oo-ordina'.. of R in the hori:.emisl plane of FiJ. 12. II may be verilied Ihal MO _ PT and N ° _ TR. fig. 21 . ho ..... thi. horizontal plane as viewed from above. Th II•• cases Ii). (ii),(iii) and (iv) mentioned in 1hi, Paper,
Cuse (I) Wh..., Ihe compOJIe1lIS of Ihe imposed ,' rain rale are such Ihal (I'l.' - V,.,KI - 20) is smaller than -(V,., + V,.J si n .". the val~ of M O i. oepli,'. acoor (according 10 the first of equalion. (24)~ When the str<:SSn are in the limit state, then a situation oo:urs as indicaled by the second of equation . (17): the . tress poinl P rMnters the elastic region and ddormation i. purely clastic. The corresponding str.in rate vector point. downward. in Fig. 21 inlo the region indicalcd as case: (i). In thai case the Stress history beina purely clastic is dc$cribed by equations (24). Equation, (26) . re not valid and (a ' + b' ) sohcd in the Manner of equation (78) does not apply. Actually (78) with M' negalive i. unaODeptlhlc, because: thai ';olat.. the thcnnoo)'llamic requi rement (13} In the undrained simple: shear test as described by equation. (11) M ' defined by (79) i, always positive due to the third line of (J7). So case (i) docs not occur and th.re remain th .... caxs---(ii). (iii) and (iy)-.... hich arc releyant to this study.
,w"
Ca.<el Oil . (iii) olld (in) M ' and N ' are Ihe co-ordina les of R in the horizon· tal plane in Fig. 12. A. the ape. a ngle of lriangle R, PRo
64
(86)
When R lies to the right of R.then ~
cos y'
(87)
IHtrrmilUllioN of (z¥. - W ) When th. total strain 1111. i, given. M ' and N ' a ", known from equations (79) and (SO). Then only t.... o r.lalion5-( &2) and {83)-ar. availab!. 10 Iklennin. the three unknown. 0' , b' , (2o/r - 2D~ .ince (84) docs not contribut. any useful information. a being also unknown. Vermeer'. proposal for solvinl this system i. to require that Ihe rat. of elaslicenergy dissipation ,t' i. a minimum. U,inS this principle, tOge1!ter with the therm odynamic requirement of eneraY dissip.tion, it i. argued belo .... on logical grounds Ihat one of the thr ... unknown.;' ~ro in each of the th ree cases (ii~ (iii) and (iv) mentioned above. The quantity A" is defined by
A" .. - v•. : ~.. - v•. :~" -
(Y•••
+ v,.•
ra .•
and tbi. can, by using equations (20) and (21) he transformed into
,t' .. [Il - 20),1' + i' + 1'(2o/r - U»')fG Comparinl equation. (24) with the limit values of equalion'12~~ A" becomes for the limit stress Stale
,t' .. (II - 2v + sin'
~)i' +.' sin' 4>(2~ - 2n)'JIG
18S) Since relation (17) establi.hes J independently, • minimum of A' i. obtained by choo.ing the lowest """. sible value nf (2~ _ W)'. Thi. is ta ntamount to requiring Ihat the absolut. value ) 2~ - 20 ) i• • minimum. Together with the thermodynamic requi",· ment (1 3) the conclusions .... hich follnw co.n he drawn. Rt lulll"l1 t X(lTtlSlons
COl
.'l
" , .. (M ' Ian ~ cos v' + N° )F/2 si n ~ cos b' .. (M' tan ~ 001'" - N' )F/2 si n 4> cos v'
(89)
211- - W ... O CQM (Iii). In this case (2o/r - 20) cannot he zero, because (S6) introduced inlO (83) would then produce I ncaative b' , which violat.. requirement. (13~ A minimum for )2o/r - 20 ) is obtained by chooslns b' 10
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
El..A$TO-PLASTIC VERSION OF OOUBLE SLIDING MODEL
do: 1000Iin do: Jonlo G .
be Jm). So 1M solution is ,.,·F/c04.;> 0 /I. _0
tJ· _
(2'" - 20) "n4«~G)
... (+M ' tan.a1S.· - N · ) <0
Cax (lv~ In lloimilar mlnne. (87) and (81) requi'" in tbi. cue that 4 ' be zero. So 1M IOlulion i.
_0 } /I. _ M'Ffco'It;;> 0 (2. _ W) $in ¢Is/G) ... ( _ M ' tan '" cos y. - N· );> 0
",
( I ma~
Mathematical dab<>ralion or the double llidin& free /0111;0& model. A,c!tiCC$ of M fC'-Sa 2t, No. 4, S6I-SSlI. de JOlSdin de Jonlo O. (l977b~ Constituli"" rdl tions 10< lho !low oIa .......1.. u....... bly in lhe lim;\ ".Ie of Itml. f>r«. 9r~ 1111. Coo(. Soil M fClt.. Fitt £"(1"(1, T okyo, pp. 87-9S. ()rQcher, A. (1976). An npeOlMnll. inyesl;<ion of 110" rules for ITInu.ar ItIItcrial, usin&optically sen· tili"" 1115. panicb. GftHfCh~lqw 16. No.4. 591 -
.,,-
U9n~ COIISOIl.dllUJ ~nd,aiMJ Ji,«:1 Ji"'p~ SUD' 1t.1I on ""! IUIl/tti clay•. R~arch "'pOrt T 12---82, M alSlthUKIIJ Inll;Wle of Technology. Randolph, M. f . and Wroth C. P. (198n Application of thl: f,ilure SlIle in undrained simple . hear to 1hI: lhaft capacity of driven piles. Gtow:hniqw 31, No.
Ladd, C. C. oft Edit'" L
4·
(91)
REFE RENCES
BtJri n, D. L (197J~ T10t MMl:imit of JDlllttJuJ h>oIl~ ill llot .lJnplt IN"'" 4P_41111 PhD thesis, Uniyersity of Cunbridse. do: Jonelin de Jonlo O. (l9S8~ T1Ic unddinilenm in kinmllliel for friction matcrials. I'roc. Cot{. £tJrf~ Pta"," Probl. BI"IWdr I, 5S-70. do: Jouclin do: Jnnlo G. (1959). SUllies tJJtJ ki....""'flc. in l/w f<'i~ . _ of tJ , ...,.,.u" _mal. Thais, URi\'U"Jity of DdR. do: Jossdin do: Jonlo O . (1971~ T1Ic double slidiD& free rotlti", model for ITInular ........ blies. GftH«It/OIqwo' lI, No 2. US-163. do: Jouclin do: Jonlo O . (1972). DiJcuslion, Session II , It_ Memorial Sympoaium. S,rnJ-Jl,tJin 1It"'..,..,. ofJOiIl (ed. Parry. It. H. G.) pp. 2S&-261. Cam-
bOd.,: Foul ...
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
1.10- 151. Ro we. P. W. (l962~ The ""'" dilatancy ",Iauon for ' Ialk equilibrium of III auembly of particles in contlC!. I'roc. R.oy. Soc. 11.169, m-S27. Twnisscn, J. A. M. & Venn .... , P. A. ( 1 9I8~ Analysis of doub!<: tbelrin& in frictional ItIIlmlls. Inl. J. Nwnn. d A.wy. Mflll. ~II. 11, )2}-:WO. VeTl1I«f, P. A. (1980). Double Jlidin& witbin I n elUtnplu.tic f........OI"k. l...G. M .-.leUlI"fIt~ 11, 19'}...2O'1. Vmn«r, P. A. ( 1 981~ A fonnulation and an.a.lyois of &ranular no ... "'oc. 1111. C""," M«II. &It<maur Slrvct. Mtfli4. " 3tl-339. WrOlh, C. P. (l9l-4~ T1Ic interpretation of in situ lOiI 1eII..
w.,,«MIqw :M. No.. 4. 44~.
Wroth. C. P. (1987). The behaviour 0( normally consoli· elated day .. obKrved in undrained direct .bear le,U. G#of«Miqw 37. No. 1,31....1.
65
de Jasselin de Jong, G. (1989). Geotechnique 39, No.3, 1989, 565-566
DISCUSSION
Elasto-plastic version of the double sliding model in undrained simple shear tests G. de JOSSELIN de JONG (1988). Geotechnique 38, No.4, 1988,533-555
that case (iii) is shown, since R in Fig. 12 lies in the region indicated as case (iii) in Fig. 21. If this is correct it implies that a stress path of the type shown in Fig. 13 is followed, so that 21/1 1 decreases gradually from 0 to [-(nI2) + 4>]. This gives the impression that the stress point P moves along the cone in Fig. 12 (as viewed from above) in a counterclockwise direction. The following
R. E. Gibson, Golder Associates (UK) Ltd On p. 544 of this Paper the Author states that the vector PQ (in Fig. 12) represents ' ... the strain rate imposed on the material in the undrained simple shear test'. It is, however, not clear to me which of the three cases (ii), (iii) and (iv), is referred to here. Comparing Figs, 12 and 21 it would appear
t(6~x - 6;y)/ Go Fig. 22. Adapted stress space witb limit cone, similar to Fig. 12, but SbOWD from other side
565
66
DISCUSStON question then arises: what stress path will P follow in the remaining cases (ii) and (iv) ? Perhaps the Author will favour us with one of his elegant drawings to elucidate this point. Authors' repl y
The case represented in Fig. 12 on p. 544 is indeed a case iii. In order to demonstrate this explicitly the situation of Fig. 12 is redra"'n here in Fig. 22. In this Fig. the adapted stress space with the limit COile is shown from the other side by rotating the space over 180 degrees to permit a better view of the stress paths. The main rate vecto r, as imposed by the undrained simple shear test, is a vector of length p, parallel to the axis of f1•.IG _ f1 j G and in its d ir«:tion. So it points towards the left, here . It is shown only once as the vector P ,Q for the case that the stress point is located in P, . Let the stress path POP'P l be considered in more detail, fi rst. Point Po represents the initial st ress state, in which according to the st resses. indicated on the co·ordinate axes, a,,(O) a, ,{O) - 0 and a;,(O) < f1~(O). According 10 equations (32) this implies q. > q. and so an active, initial situation denoted as case iii in the paper. is involved. The part PoP, is the stress path during the elastic stage. This part has the diroction of the imposed strain rate voctor of length p. The elastic stage ends when the stress point has reached the limit cone in the point p .. This point corresponds to the point P of Fig. 12 in the paper. The tilted plane R, oP,R." is the plane of the a·, bO shea rings. The imposed strain rale vector P,Q of
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
p is decomposed into a plastic component P,R,". consisting of only /I" shear, and an elastic component R, oQ, parallel 10 the tangent plane of the cone in P,. The elastic component R. oQ can be deoompooed into a ,J.-c:omponenl R:R o p a rallel to the circular cross seclion of the cone and an scomponent R OQ parallel to the line connecting P to the cone vertex V. The vector R:R* points towards the lefl and Ihal gives the stress poinl P a motion in a counterclockwise direction as viewed from above. This agrees with the corrOCI impression of Professor Gibson. The component R*Q points do"'nward and thaI produces a downward movement, in the form of a helical line on the cone surface, that spirals downwards. AI point P, Ihe langent to this line has the di roction of the vector R, oQ. Two other of those helical lines arc shown on the far side of the cone surface. BOlh belong to case iii initial stress states. Case iv initial stress states produce similar stress paths, that are shown on thi s side of the cone surface. The helical lines on both sides of the cone are similar, but they are each olher mirror image. When the ct:nt~ angle 21{1, of the radius to P , has values between (- tit + i/.) and ( -til - (1,). then case ii initial stress sta tes are in~olved, originally. For such a case ii the cor~ sponding dotted stress paths, after reaching Ihe cone rim, turn downward and follow a straigh! line path towards the cone vertex. The ~urved helical stress paths of the cases iii or iv initial stress states have the border li nes between case ii and cases iii or iv as asymptotes. length
67
Reprinted (rom Geotet:imique, June 1978
TECHNICAL NOTES
Improvement of the lowerbound solution for the vertical cut off in a cohesive, frictionless soil O. DE JOSSELIN DE l ONG· INTRODUCTION
One of the classical problems in soil mechanics is the determination of the depth h, to which a soil can be excavated by a vertical cut off before collapse OC(:urs. When the soil is rigid plastic with cohesion e and no internal friction, > - 0, and its flow properties obey normality, the upper and lowerbound theorems of plasticity are applicable to h. Let a parameter « be defined by
h
~
«elY
where y is the proper weight or the soil, and let «coo, be the value of « correspondi ng to the collapse height hooL , . Then according to the upperbound theorem a value of « larger t han «ooL' is obtained by computing h with a kinematically admissible velocity fie ld, and according to the lowerbound theorem a value 0(<< smaller than "wi, is obtained by usi ng a statically admissible stress field. The solutions known from literature (Heyman, 1973) give ,, _ 2·83 for the 10werbound and « _ 3·83 (or the upperbound. The purpose of this Technical Note is to present a staticaJty admissible stress field corresponding to« - 3'39, which improves the existing lowerbound value. A stress distribution is statically admissible if it obeys the following requirements: (a) The stresses arc everywhere in equilibrium with the soil weight. With lension stresses positive and y in negative y-dire<:tion, the equilibrium equations are (8a.J8x)+(&rsJ8y) - 0 (aa.~/ax)+(aa~~/ay) _ y
(I)
(b) Stress discontinuities are allowed, provided that equilibrium is not violated. With local coordinales n, I normal and tangential to a discon tinuity line separating regions (a) and (b) Ihis is expressed by (2)
(c) The stress state in every point of the interior is within or on the limits imposed by the yield condition (a•• - a.~)~+(a•• +a•• )~ :$ 4c" (d) The stresses comply with loads applied to the boundaries. cut off the stresses on all boundaries are zero.
(3)
In the case of th e vertical
LI MIT STATE OF STRESS EVERYW HERE
The idea was to use a computer for the generation of a statically admissible stress field in ~ 0IL'1oJo ToduIkaJ NOle ...... I Sept.... ber, 1m . For further LIc101b _ '-Ide btl • • "",or. o Department orei.il En.in«,;n., Uni.en.ity orTechnolOlY. Delft, Tho N •• hcrl.ond$.
68
".
TECHNlCAL~
Fla:. 1. DlsroIItlnuity lines, "htl! the tntlre region .d).emt to tbe boundary Is In the lim it slate of ItHIs
order to avoid the usual procedure of predetermining intuitively stress distributions, which restrict the analysis 10 a limited class of solutions. The stress field was generated by using K311er's equ ations, which are based on equilibrium and the limit state of stress everywhere. The equations are integrated numerically along slress characteristics 5, and 52 giving the mean normal stress and the principal stress directions in successive noda l points of the network of characteristics. The shape of the network is obtained by computati on of the locations of the nodal points assuming arcs of circles between them. Being a solution of Kotter's equations the stress distribution satisfies requiremen ts (a) and (c). Where necessary stress discon tinui ty lines were in troduced and the stresses on them were made to satisfy (b). The construction of the stress characteristic network starts from the boundaries, where the stresses are known. On the boundary the solution has to be chosen to be either strong or wea k. Since shear stresses on the boundaries are zero in this case, the principal stresses are pa rallel and perpendicular to the boundaries. The principal stress perpendicular to the boundary is zero, but the principal stress parallel to the boundary can be either a tension or a compression . When the stresses along the boundary are in the limit state, the tension or compression have both the same absolute value, 2e. The choice was made to start along AD with a compression of 2e for the prin cipal stress parallel to AB and along CD with a tension of 2e (Fig. I). So below CD the stress state is given by (4) 0 •• = )'y+2e; O.y = 0YX = 0; On "'" yy Satisfying (I) and (3) with the equality sign. A first trial was made by assuming maximum tension 2e for the principal stress all along BC, also. Constructing the field of characteristics leads in point C to overlaps, which resolve by in troduction of two stress discontinuities CE and CF, making angles .,,/8 wi th CD and CD respectively in the corner point, C. The discontinuity line CE has a bended form and cuts th e vertical in a point B located at a depth 3,24 ely. In this solution the entire region CEB is in th e limit state of stress. In order to satisfy the requirements (a) and (c) in every point of the interior, it is necessary to extend the stress field over the entire soil body. It proved impossible, however, to con-
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
69
T1'C HN IC"~
'" "
NOT£'s
• I
CO'FF'
CO'FF'I
'-.lr-I I
FF'HH~
\..1I
- - U;u-l r1
i'" I
--- 16 yy -JY)
I I I
I I
I , ,I
H~
I
I I I I
I I , I pp'
: 101 : I
.................. :.; . _. . I
I
, I
(oj
I Jj IKI<.'II"K I I I
I
"J
Fig.! (a). Fk ld or s er, . d\anodnistic:5. "hom lhe rrgioo adjacmll(l BC Is IMlI in lhe limit SlIIlt(lf strtS5; (b)bori_tal and Wfrtiali prladpGll .1rts5ts up I(llnfinily In tbt rtglon I(llbe rigbl (lr FHJK
tinue the solution in the region aroun d B and downwards, because the sheet of stress characteristics folded backwards. Therefore the solUlion mentioned above was not acceptable. STRFSSES IN CEB NOT IN LIMIT STATE
In order to render the situation in B better suited for adjustment to Ihe passive Rankine Stale in the region below AB, it seemed appropriate to consider a non limit stress state in the region CEB expressed by (5) This stress state is statically adm issible because it satisfies (\) everywhe re, and fo r (- 4cl"'l) < y
70
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
200
cAlcnding the stress characteristics s. from the line CF lip to the region CEO, wh ere the 51rcu
state given by (5) exists. A next nodal point on CEB is found from a previous one by intersection wi th a subsequent Sa stress characteristic and bending both in such a manner, that the stress state required by Kijtter's equation along the s. line is in equilibrium across the discontinuity line with the known stress state (5) acco rding to re lation (2). The line CEB curves and crosses the vertical through C in a point B located a a depth 3·39 ely. The s2line through B inte rsects the other discontinuity line emanating from C in the point F (see Fig. 2a). For this solution it proved possible to continue below B with a field in the limit stale of stress by introducing two Prandtl wedges with their centres in B. The pattern of stress characteristics obtained by starting from the line AB, the two wedges in B and the line BF, can be extended downwa rds towards infinity. The pauern is bounded above by a SI line shown in Fig. 2(a) as the d otted line, FO. STRESSES BELOW FF'
A conflict arises in elttending the solution in the region above FO, because the pattern of stress characteristics will fold and solving KBtter's equation beyond such a fol d requ ires complicated arra ngements. T he analysis was simplified by assuming a stress field with principal stresses vertical and horizontal, in the region below the horizontal line FF' and to the right of a discontinuity line FHJ K, wit h K at infinity. Since shear stresses are zero on vertical and horizontal planes, integration of the equilibrium equations (I) then give Un W+f(y); U u " U u = 0; Un'" yy+g(lt) (6) with f(y) and g(lt) arbi trary, adjustable functions. In order to have equilibrium on the line FF', between the stress distributions (4) and (6), the value of g(lt) has to be zero along FF'. As a consequence g(lt) is zero in the entire region to the right of FHJ 'K'. From F to H the value of fey) is adjusted in such a manner, that equilibrium exists through the discontinuity line between the stresses in the established field of characteristics BFa and the stresses (6). In every point of BFO there is one possible di rection for such a discontinuity line, and F H follows as a trajectory by plou ing successive tangents. The line FH is unique. At point H the tangent is vertical and the discontinui ty line is also principal stress trajectory. F rom H to J the discontinui ty line is arbitra ri ly chosen to continue as principal stress trajectory. T hen shear stress on HJ is ze ro and equilibrium across HJ requires that f =g on HJ, because only then shear stress to the righ t of HJ is zero, the stress state being isotropic. In order that (6) satisfies requirement (c) it is necessary, that (7) (f(y)-g(x» ;S 2c in the entire region FHJ KK'J' H'F'. In Fig. 2(b) a plot of f(y) full line and g(x) dashed line is given . A vertical line pp' in the region HKK' has a constant value for g(x) and this gives a vertical dashed line in Fig. 2(b). The point J is at such a height, that the line n ° is critical having (f-g) .. 2e. Below 1 the discontinuity line J K is taken at .. /4 with the horizontal giving values of fey) and g(x) as shown in Fig. 2(b). From this figure it follows that (7) is satisfied everywhere. CONCLUSION
Constructing a stress field by characteristics with stresses in the limit state everywhere did not lead to an acceptable solution. It was necessary to assume in the region CEB stresses that were not in the limit state. The stress field obtained then, satisfies the requirements (a) to (d) in the entire soil body and therefore it is statically admissible stress field. T he value 0:<=3'39 is t herefore a lowerbound to O:<",,:n'
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
71
001
That the solution gives a sare height (ollows from the consideration of the kinematics. A potenti al slipline would be the s~ line BFD. Slip cannot occur along this line, though, be<:ause of the slope discontinuity in F. The solution was verified in 1976 by C. H. Engels with a different computer program, based on the relation for stress discontinuities developed in her graduation study. REFERENCE Heyman, 1. (1913).
Simple Plastic TheQry applied to Soil Me(;hanics. PrtIC, Symp. On Iht role of pIllS/idly Cambridge.
mIDi! multtMJJu, 161- 172.
72
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
D~
JO$$I!UN DE JOI'
30. No,
I, 1-16
Application of the calculus of variations to the vertical cut off in cohesive frictionless soil G, DE JOSSELIN DE JONG The collapse heighl of a vertical cut off is computed
hauteur, corrcspondant 1 la ruplure d'un talus vertical, esl dtterrnin« it l'aide du cakul de varialions en prbupposanl I"exl!; tence d'une: liJlle de I lissemeni unique Cn eas de: rupture. La classc de ligneS, COntenanl celie ligne de gl iueme nt, est definie par nquilibre IOUII el local soU! C(l n~ition d'~UlI de eo nlraintes limites. L'exll"l:male de la class posstde Ia forme d'une involute. En vtrifiant la solution, il est fUnlOnU"t que ]'ex ll"l:ma le produit une hauteur de talus plus ~1cWc que la hauteur de rupture, oil une: hauteur qui necorrespond pasdu loull un extremum, Ces resullaU dCcevanu soni engo:nbl
by use of the varia tional c.o.lculus auumin8 tl«: uistence of a real slip line at collapse:, A ciass of lina containinl the real slip line is defined by tOUil and local equilibrium co nditions of the limit stress state. The extremal of lhe dass is found 10 be an involute. Verification of lhe: solution shows lhal the extremal gives ~ithc:r an unsafe eslimate of the collapse lwciaht Or corresponds 10 no ulremum al aU. These disappointing res ults aTe a comequcnce of the inadequate fonnullttion of slope !lability problems, when slip linn are computed by the calculus of variation, .
lNTRODUcnON The calculus of variations provides mathematical procedures to find the shape of an e1ttre mal, the curve that ma1timizes or minimizes the value of an integral along that line. For the readerwho is not familiar with the subject the books by Bolza ( 1973) and Petrov ( 1968) are recommended here, The first because it trea ts all aspects of the parametric solution employed in this article, the second because it gives a comprehensive and convenient descript ion of the subject matter and its practical use. Because it can be used ror establishing the shape of a line wit h pa rticular properties, the ealculus of variations seems of interest for soil mechanics. especially for solving slope stabili ty problems. Since Coulomb, it has become a standard procedu re to solve plane st ra in stability problems by using minimalization procedures in search for the line that represents a railure plane, The variational calculus could be applied to determine the shape of such a line, if the mechanica l requirements of failure along the line can be formulated in the form of integrals. whose e~treme values are related to the stability, This idea bas occurred to several investigators, e.g. Revilla and Castillo (1977). Ramamurthy e/ al. (1977), Baker and Garber (1977, 1979). The approaches proposed by these different writers differ and demonstrate that there is not one unique manner to formulate the minimalization problem. Also th e Author was intrigued a few years ago by the possibility of usi ng tbe variational calculus for establishing sli p lines, but withheld the results from publication when it became dear that the solutions were of a disappointing, unacceptable character. The reaso n for presenting this work now however is that an analysis as pub lished by Bake r and Garber(1978) is incomplete and produces re sults that prove to be not mean ingful when the analysis is properly pursucd. It is the objeetive of thi s Paper to demo nstrate an analysis that is eoncluded by investigating the 1)iJcusslon on Ih...... peT doses I Ju ..... 1980. For furtl>er tkl:alLs I t t l",lde bad: co..... • Department of Ci. il En,ginceri"l. Ulliversity ofTcchnolol)', Delft.
73
2
G.DEJONO
conditions for an c)(tremum and to show the kind of disappointments that are encountered when the calculus of variations is applied to determine slip lines. In order to be specific and to deal with ex plicit results, the relatively simple case is treated here
of a vertical cut off in cohesive, frictionless, non-dilalanl soil. The collapse behaviour of the vertical cut offin such a soil has been studied by reliable procedures based on the rigorous proofs of the theory of plasticity. The exact solution is not yet available, but il is known thaI the collapse he ight h'911 is unique and expressed in terms of the cohesion c and the specific weight Y. is between the following limits 3'64c1l' ~ h'Q" < 3·83c11
The upper limit corresponds to a Fel!cnius solution with a circular slip line, satisfying a kinematically admissible velocity field . The lower limit corresponds to a statically admissi ble stress distribution determined numerically by Pastor (1978). Because of this information on the collapse height, the vertical cut off is an appropriate example for testing the determination of slip lines by variational methods. CONCEPTS BASIC TO THE ANA LYSIS
In its simplest form the calculus of variations is used to de termine the shape of one particular line, wh ich is called extremal, because it can produce an extreme value ofa definite integral. The analysis described in this Paper is an application of this simplest form of variational calculus to the slope stability problem of establishing a safe estimate for the height h of a vertical cut off. The one line ana lysis is based on a few concepts that are decisive for the formulation of the problem and are determinative for the resulting solution. The first concept is the assum ption that at collapse, there exists one particular slip line, which is called here the real slip line. The second concept is a class of potential slip lines, defined in such a manner that it includes the real slip line. The third concept is the presumption that a safe estimateofh can be found by determining the extremal. Real slip line
In the plane strain case of an embankment in z direction, the slip line in a verlical X,)I plane represents a failure plane perpendicular to X,)I. Fai lure planes exist at collapse. They are required 10 separate soil masses that slide with respect to each other and with respect to the stationary soil mass below. When sliding occurs over the failure planes, the stresses along it are in the limit state of stress. Since the soil is taken to be frictionless and non-dilalan t, the lines representing the failu re planes in the two-d imensional x, y-plane are stress characteristics. There are two famili es of conjugate stress characteristics. For slip to develop, it is enough that sliding takcs place along one of the two conjugate lines. This line should intersect the boundaries in at least two points in order to separate a soil mass that is free to move. For sliding it is necessary that the slip line has a continuous slope. The assumption is that at colla pse there is at least one continuous smooth slip line which corresponds to a stress characteristic and which intersects the boundaries in two points. This line is called here the real slip line. The shear stress along the real slip line has the maximum available value which is equal to the cohesion c for a frictionless soil. Class oj potential slip lines
For the analysis a class oflines is required that contains the real slip line. Thisclass is obtained by selecting lines in such a manner that their stress distribution satisfies tbe same equilibrium conditions as the real slip line. At incipienteollapse, the separated soil mass that is about 10 slide
74
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS TO VERTICAL CUT OFF IN COHESIVE, FR ICTIO:-lLESS SOIL
3
is still in equilibrium. Its total weight is balanced by the stresses along the real slip line. This is called the requirement of total equilibrium in the following sections. This requirement can be formulated in the form of definite integralS along the line. Furthermore, the real slip line is a stress characteristic. Therefore the stresses along it satisfy Kotler's equation, which represents local equilibrium for the limit stress state, in a direction tangenria! to the stress characteristic. The requirement of local eq uilibrium is satisfied by introducing Kotter's equation in the integral expressions. The requiro;:ments oftotal and local equilibrium produce three definite integralsas shown in the section headed' Determination of the integrals'. The value of one of these integrals corresponds to the he ight of the cut off. The other two are zero. All lines that give these values to the inlegrals are called potential slip lines, because each of them might be the real slip linc. Extremal The calculus of va riations provides methods to find the extremal. That is a particular line of the class of potential slip lines, computed in such a manner, that it can give an extreme value to h, the height of the cut off. In the section headed' Determination of the extremal', the solution for this line is produced by standard variational procedures. The extremal of the potential slip lines is not necessarily the real slip line. It can be any line satisfying the equilibrium I;onditions imposed. The value of h, I;omputed for the extremal is called homr here. This value is an extremum for h, if it is a maximum or a minimum. If it is a minimum, this indicates tbat hom, is smaller than the values of h corresponding to all other lines of the class investigated. If this class is large enough to contain the real slip line (the line that is assumed to correspond to h'~lI)' it may be concluded thaI hom. is smaller than or eq ual to h,.rr. The analysis then procures a safe estimate for the building height of the embankment. The analysis presented here was initiated originally in the supposition that a minimum would result. VerificaliQn
The basic assumptions mentioned in this section may occur to be plausible for soil mechanical inves tigators because they are commonly postulated in slip line analysis. There are two improvements with respect to common procedures: the shape of the line is a result of the analysis and the stress distribution along the slip line satisfies limit stress state conditions by applying Kilner's equation. The assumptions are, however, not self-evident and are even debatable. This is revealed by a verification of the solution using procedures that are standard in the calculus of variations. The character of the extremum is established in the section headed' Investigation of the $Clution' by use of these verifkation methods, Showing that either a weak maximum or no extremum at all is involved. This is disappointing because the conclusion can only be that the analysis was not meaningful. Unfortunately, it is not possible to establish, apriori, whether thc basic assumptions underlying the analysis will lead to a meaningful end result. It is only after the solution has been obtained that its character can be verified. Therefore, first thc ana lysis, based on the three plausible assumptions mentioned in this section. is carried out in the following text. In the final section the result is discussed and the basic assumptions are reconsidered. DETERM INATION OF THE INTEGRALS
Theverticalcutoff is shown in Fig. I . The soil is limited by thefollowingstress free boundaries:
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
75
4
O. DE
Y, ..
"
-'-'~
,.
" ........... C
"
- 1;~:WdV»!)}AV;;«
,
/
A.
SO~O
•o
•
, A .. ,
Fig. I.
Vtrtlcal cut off wiCh p,mntiaJ slip liM
the vertical plane Be and the horizontal planes AS and CD. The problem is to determine an acce pta ble height II of the cuI off. The soil properties involved are the specific weight y. the co hesion c and a vanis hing angle of internal friction cP _ O. No external loads are acting on the boundary A BCD. Failure is due only to the weight ofthc sliding soil mass. Class of potential slip lines
If the class oflincs considered is to consist of potential sli p lines, the li nes have to intersect the free surface in two points, E and F. The lowe r point E will coincide wi th the lower corner point B, and F is on the upper surface CD. So the lines in the ana lysis are lines SF. The shape of the line BF will be treated in parametric form, such that the horizontal x coordinate and the vertical y coordinate a re both functions of a parameter (( that increases from ((a in B to <XF in F. This can be written as (1)
In the analysis the parameter a will be taken to be the local angle between the line and the x direction (see Fig. I). Differentiati on with respect to a is indicated by a prime such that
x' =
dx/d~,
x" _ d 2 x /d'l\
y' =
dy/d~
y. = d 2y /dct?
(2a) (2b)
A small element of BF with lengt h ds subtcnds in horizontal and vertical directions distances dx, dy (see Fig. 2) given by dx=coSads, dy=sin((ds . (3)
In order to be a potential slip line, it is necessary that the shear stress acting on the line BF has the maximum available valu e, which is eq ual to the cohesio n c. The normal stress on BF will be denoted as p and is taken positive for compression. These quantities will be used to evaluate the integrals that are developed in the following.
76
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
CALC ULUS Of VAR IATIONS TO VERTI CAL CUT Off IN COHESIVE, fRICfIONLESS SOil
rom~
Fig. 2. For.,., d R (black arrow) aCllng on t"'mml ds 15 JHHM1II p tis ( .. hlle a rro..,.)
5
of a , h... r compO"',,"1 cds and a !>Oronal com-
Total equilibrium
In the state of incipient failure, the soil and aU its subdivisions satisfy equilibriu m. So the forces acting on the part RCF, separated from the main soil body by the line SF in Fig. I, form an equilibrium system. This means that the force Q created by the weight of the part RCF is in equilibrium with the resistive force R due to the stresses acting along SF. This equilibrium wiU be called total equili brium because it refers to the equilibri um of the total mass BCF, in contrast to local equilibrium which is considered later and refers to the equil ibrium at all points ofthe line BF.
Total equili bri um is satisfied when the forces Q and R annihilate each other. EKpressed in their x , ycompOnenlS: X", YQ ; X R • Y" and their moments M Q, M" around the origin of coordinates, this requires that (4)
Since the soil weight acts only in vertical direction downwards, the horizontal component XQ of Q is zero and the vertical component can be obtained by integrating over slices of width dx as shown in Fig. I, th is gives XQ= O,
yQ = - J:}-(Yr - Y)dX
(5)
The moment of Q around the origin, positive for counter--clockwise rotation, is MQ
= -
f:
Y(yF - y)xdx
(6)
In these cJtpressions x, y are th e coordinates of the line SF an d integration is along SF. Thc components of the resistive force R can also be expressed in the form of integrals along BF. Let dX", dYR be the x, y components of the force d R (black arrow in Fig. 2) produced by the stresses on the stri p of unit width corresponding 10 the line clement ds. This elementary force dR consists of a component c ds tangential to ds and a normal component pds (white arrows in Fig. 2). Decomposed into x, y directions these give according to Fig. 2 and using equation (3)
dX" _ c cos a.ds - p sin r:zds = c dx - pdy
(7a)
dY,, _ csina.ds+pcosr:zds _ cdy+pdx
(7b)
From these the components X". Y" of R are obtained by integration along BF giving
X" -
J: s: dX" -
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
(cdx-pdy)
(8a)
77
6
G. DEJONG
YA =
J: J: J: dYR =
(cdY+pdx)
(Sb)
The momen t Mil orR around the origin is
MR =
J:
(xdY,II- ydX,II) =
[c(xdy - ydx)+p(xdx+ ydy)]
(9)
The three equations (4), that represent total equilibrium, can now be clIpressed in the form of integra ls. T he fi rst two a rc transformed into the relations ( lOa) a nd (lOb) by use ofthc equations (5) and (8). The last becomes relation (JOe) by using equations (6) and (9). This gives
f:
(cdx-pdy) = 0
(lOa)
(cdy+pdx -Y(YF- y)dx] = 0
(lOb)
[c(xdy-ydx) +p(x dx+ ydy)-rtYF- y)xdx] = 0
(JOe)
f:
f:
These relations represent tota l equilibrium and agree with the equation (5) in the paper by Bake r and Ga rber ( 1979). The analysis continues in the following sections by introducing Kotler's equation along tbe line SF. T his is an essential difference betwecn that paper and the analysis followed hcre. Local equilibrium
In a frictionless mate rial (for which tP .. O)a potential slip line coincides with a stress characteristic. Local equilibrium along stress characteristics is e1:pressed by two Kotter's equations, one for each ofthc two conjugate stress characteristics. The equation corresponding to the line BF is (dp /ds) - 2c(drx/ds)+., si n a = 0 .
( II )
Thisisa differential equation that can be integrated along.)". Adj usti ng the integration constant to fit the si tu at ion in point F gives af"ter integrat ion (12)
in which PF' a F an d YF stand for va lues of t he q uanti ties p, a and y respectively in the point F. Let PF be defined by (13) PF = (PF-2C1f.F)/2c then p can be solved from equation (12) to give P = 2cW r +a) + }"(YF - y)
(14)
It may be rema rked here that it is impossible to solve for P in a similar manner from Kotter's equation, when the soil has internal friction, such that tP is unequal to zero. Therefore, the analysis developed below cannot be applied dircclly for soils with internal friction. Eq uation (14) is used to eli minate p from the integral expressions (10). This gi ves then
f:
78
[cdx - 2c(.8r+ a) dy- Y(Yr- y)dyJ = 0
( ISa)
[cdy+2cWF +a)dx] = 0
(ISb)
f:
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
CALCULUS OF VAR IATIONS TO VERTICAL CtTT OFF IN COIIESIVE, FRICTIONLESS SOIL
Since (yf - Y.) is equal to h, the height of the vertical cut off, the parts containing 1 become
f: J:
1(Y.. - )')d)' = hh
1
(l6a)
y(YF - )'»'d)' = iYhl(yF +2)'6)
.
(16b)
By taking the origin of coordinates in point G on one-third of the height of the cut off(Fig. I) such that . (17) )'F=ih, )'6= -ih, x. - O the in tegral (16b) vanishes and the integrals (15) reduce to fo :Z
1", =
f1=
J: J: J:
(dx-2(jJ .. +a.)d)'] = 1'1h
1
1c
(18a) (l8b)
[d),+2(jJF+a.)dx]:z 0
.
[(xdy- ),dx)+2(jJf+ a.) (xdx+yd)'» ) - 0
(18c)
At this stage it is convenient to introduce the parametric manner of describing these integrals. From the relations (2a) it follows that dx, dy can be wri tten as functions of the parameter a. in the following manner (19) dx = x'da., dy=y'da. . Further, relations (3) indicate that tan a _ (dy/dx) and using relations (19) this can be written as tan a.". (y'lx') or _ (20) a. = arc tan (y'lx') So the integral expressions (18) can be written as
The functions Go(et:), G ,(et:), G l(et:) introduced on the left-hand sides of equations (21) are functions of x,)" x', y', defined by the integrals between brackets. Because of equations (I) and (2) they can be considered to be functions ofa only_ These three in tegrals represent the three equilibrium conditions for balancing the total d rivi ng force Q and the total resistive for«: R. In addition, local equilibrium is guara nteed in all points of the potential slip line OF in adirection parallel to the line, the line being a stress cha racteristic.
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
79
8
O. De JONQ
DETERMI NATION OF THE EXTREMAL
The in tegral exp ressions (21) are suitable for application of the variational calculus in o rder to find an ex treme value of h, the height of the vertical cut off for given values of c and y. The analysis consins of determining the func tions X(II) and y(a) th at represent an extremal in pa rameter form. Such an eXlremal is th e curve th at produces an extreme value for r o. the in tegral
defined by (2Ia), under the addi tional condilions th at the integrals r , and r1 defined by (2Ib) and (lie) vanish. In the calculus of va riations th is is a so-called isoperimetr ic problem that can be soived by th e use of Lagrange mul tipliers. The following analysis is based on th e Weierstrass theory for parameter problems as described by Bolza ( 1904). General expression/or (he extremal Accordin g to th e theory, the curve ),'«(1'), y(1l) is fo und by solving Euler's differential equation, which in Weiers trass'S form is (22) In this eq uation subscripts stand for pa rtial differentiatio n with respe<:1 to the subscript va riable, HI .. iJllliJx, etc. T he quanti ty H is an auxi liary function given by fI _ Go+g,G, +11G1
where Go. G" Gl are the in tegrands of the equa tions (21) and I" 11 are Lagrange multipliers that are constants in th is case. Written out, the function /I has the form
Il .. [(g, + 11X)Y' + (I -glY)x']+ 2(P,,+ are tan y' Ix') [(g,
+glX)x' -( I -
11Y)y'l
(23)
Perfo rming th e partial differen tiat ions on function 1/ required in eq uation (22), th is eq uatio n becomes (24) The solution of thi s differentia l equation satisfying the pa ra metric requi rement y'lx' .. tan a (according to (20» rep resents the e" tremal. It is not so sim ple to solve equation (24) in a straightforward manner_ The solu tion, however, is as follows
X= -(g, I'l)-acosa+(b-aa)sina y _
+ (l 111)-a sin a-(b-aa) cosa
(25a) (25b)
Th is can be ve ri fied by substitu tion, using equation (2) which gives for, ins tance, x' "" dxl drJ. '"' (b -(fa) cos (f,
x'y" -x"y' ... (b _aa)l,
(X' )l
y' .. dYlda. _ (b- a.a) sin (f
+ (y' )1 =
(b _ aa)l
(263)
(26b)
Since equation (24) isa second-o rderditrerentia l eq uation, solution (25) possesses two integration constants. These are the quantitiesaand b that have to be determined from boundary conditions.
S/r(Jpe a/the extremal Equation (25) represents a curve that is called an involu te, with a circle as evolu te. In Fig. 3 the line PoBPaQ FP, ... is such a cun·e. It is the path followed by the end point P ora stri ng of length NoP o .. b, attached in No and wound arou nd the circle with radiu s No M .. o. For an arbitrary value of(f the part NoN. of lhe string with lengt h (fa is con tiguous wi th the ci rcle and the remaini ng part of length (b-aa) is th e straight line N. P•. T he ce ntre of the circle is the point M , with coordinates (27)
80
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
9
CA LCULUS Of VARIATIONS TO VERTI CAL CUT O FF IN COHESIVE, fRIC110NLESS SOIL
.......... rN,
0,
N . -_ ....
....................., . .......
.......... .j
./
.
>-
\\ . .•.,
• "'''''
i
\
cw~===C"··.'·-.O"'(:6:~~%@
"\!::' \ ../' b
'''':::~:--.' ' .".;. -- . "."....
," .
\,\"
".,./
, kMMv;,
• 0
-----p,
\. \, \
• ,+-~~~==~~~~~B~.,r . ,
Po---- -
--- --- --
... :;,..-
",
.
",-,
Fig. J. Ex trema l BP. QF, sa llsfylng boondary rend itions and consl..,int •. circle N.N.QN, as "oMt
Th~
Ii"" f'oPaQf' , I. an in.-olult wilh
The involute reaches the circle in the point Q, when the value of (I is equal to (lQ = bta
(28)
Beyond that point, th e line continues towa rds FP L •• • etc. as the path of the end point ofa string that unwinds from the circle on the other side. At point Q the curve has a cusp. Determination of the constants of rhe extremal
Of all curves that obey the relations (25), the relevant extremal is obtained by computing the values of th e integration constants a. b and the Lagrange multipliers g, , g2' In addition, the two end points B, F are to be localized on the curve by establishing the value of the parameter (I in th ose points. These are(la and (IF' In total there are six constants D, b,g(, Kl . (la. (lp to be deter· mined and Ihis requires six relations between th ese six variables. The lirst two relations are the constraints which are ex pressed by the requi rement that both r (, r 2 given by the integrals (2 1b a nd c) are zero. Since x , y, x' , y' are all known gonio metric functions of the parameter (I by relations (25) and (26), it is possible to integrate th e integrals (21 b and e) with res~t to« from «8 to (I ••• The resulting formulae are fairly lo ng and therefore,
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
81
10
(I. DE JONG
not written out in full length here. They arc known functions of G, b, II' g:. 01 •• 01". though which atc called r L" and r 2· for brevity. So the first two relations are
r.-
(0,6"1,12,11 1,011')-0
(29&)
r 1•
(a, b, I" 12. 0: •• 0;'1')
0
(29b)
_
The following two relations arc obtained by requiring that the ex tremal passes through the point B. The coordinates of B have the values (17) and combined with equations (25) there
results )1"1 - - (g, /gl)- U ..os Ila +(b-OI.a) sin IXII = 0
y.-
+ (1 {gl)-asin OIa -
(b-erBa)COS (lB =
-ih
(Joa) (30b)
The last two relations arc obtained from the boundary condi tio ns at the point F. This point is
located on the free upper su rface and therefore the magnitude of YF is Imown to be ih (see equation (17». Introduced into equation (2Sb) this gives
Yr. +(l /gJ )-asinlX,-(b -lXpl)coslX,= +ih . The location of the point F on the upper surface is not known, however, so
(31)
x, is an unknown.
The second relation to be obtained from the boundary condition in F is due to the stress state in F, which produces a valuc for the inclination of the potential slip line, by adapting limit stress state to the require me nt, that the horizontal upper s urfa ce is free of stresses, T here are two possible eases represented by the Figs 4(a) and 4(b), which eorrespond , respectively. to maximum compression and maximum tension on vertica l planes. In the com pression case ( Fig. 4(a» the value of p, the normal compressive stress on the potential slip line, is equal to PI' - +c and thedircction of the potential slip line is (32) In the case of maximum tension (Fig. 4(b», assuming a soil which can support a tension o f 2c, the normal compressive stress on the slip line is p, _ - c and the corresponding direction of the potential sli p line is xI' = n(4. It can be s hown that a solution for this second value of aI" satisfying al1 boundary condi tions and the constraints (equation (29», does not exist. For the compression case in F wc have p, _ +c and !x" _ (311 (4), which in troduced in /11' defined by ( 13) gives (33)
r
r:·.
Th is value is needed in the expressions..(29) for I · and Finall y, there are six equations for th e determination of the co nstants a, b,gt, g2' !X., !XI" These are the relations (29a and b), (3Oa and b). (3 1 and 32). Since these relations are implici t goniometric relations, it is not possible to give explicit equations for the constants. A solution satisfying al1 six relations was obtained numerically. The pertinent values of the constants are
a - O·988h. Kt - 0'0424,
IX.'" 0·604
b = 2-t4Oh. Kl - 0'6674/h,
IX" - 2· 356
(34)
Equations (25) for the coordinates, with the va lues of the constants mentioned above, form the solution for the ex tremal satisfying the Weierstrass-Euler condi ti on (22), the constrain ts (21 b) and (2 Ic) and the boundary co ndit ions. Th is solution is unique. The value for h... t , co rresponding to this solu tion of the extremal, is obtained by introducing
82
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
CA LCULUS Of VARIATIONS TO VERTICAL CUT
c
"
"
,
"
,
,-,
11
m"F IN COftESIVE, FRICTION LESS SOIL
, 8
"~I
8
Fia:- 4. Bounodary cond itions for stress characte.-Istlc rwessloo; (b) maximum lensJon
.tt~
point F on the
u~r
5tlrf.ce C D : (a) maxImum .,.,....
expressions (25) and (26) into the integral (2 Ia) and integrating. The result is too long to reproduce here. Insertion of the values (34) finally gives homl
= J·783cfy
(35)
Descripliol1 Q/the sQlutiQn/Qr the extremal
The shape of the extremal computed is shown in Fig. 3 as the line BP.QF. This line contains the point Q, which was ment ioned above to be a cusp. That Q lies indeed within the interval BF follows from a verification of the magnitude of «Q' Using the relation (28) and the values (34) il is found that (36) ~ - hlo"" 2·166 . and this is a value between «8 and I1.F given in (34). Further it can be computed that Q lies outside the soil boundaries. Using the value (36) in the expression (25b) for the y coordinate givcs, with the values (34) for the constants, YQ = 0·680Ih. This shows that Q lies a distance 0·01 34h above the free surface which is located aty "" 2h{3. The fact that the extremal BF contains the point Q, where the curve has a cusp and which lies outside the soil mass, indicates that th e solution does not represent the real slip line. For a real slip line it is physically illegitimate to form a I;USp and to exceed the soil body. Therefore the solution (35) is not the collapse height. It is either too high or too low, that depends on Ihe character of the extremum, whether it is a maximum or a minimum. INVESTIGATION OF THE SOLUTION
The solulion of the Weierstrass- Euler equation (22) is a uniqu e curve given in parameter fonn by the expressions (25) with the values (34) for the relevant constants. This curve is ca11ed an extremal because il satisfies condition (22) and that is necessary for thc I;urve to produce an eXlremum for h. However, satisfying condition (22) is not yet sufficient. Before it can be conpluded Ihat the value (35) computed for h.ml wi th the eXlfemal, indeed represents an acceptable extreme value, there arc three additional investigations to be made. These verifications arc required for establishing the character of the solution and completing the analysis. In the first place the Lege ndre condition has to be verified beeause thai condition indicates whether th e solution represents a maximum or a minimum of the height h. In the second place the Jacobi condition has to be verified because that condition indicatcs whether there exists an extremum at all. In the last place the Weierstrass E function has to be investigated because that function shows whether the ext remum (if it exists at aU) is strong or weak.
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
83
12
O. DE JONG
Legendre CQlldition
The first poin t to in vestigate is t he Legendre condition. This condition is satisfied if the sign of a quantity H" defined below, is the same for every point of the extremal, x(a), y(a), between B and F. For a maximum to be involved it is necessary that H I is negative, for a minim um that HI is positive. The definit io n of the function 11, ca n be written in three different ways which because of homogeneity are eq uivalent, Le. HI
= H~ · , ·I(y' )2
= - H,y/x'y' = H",,/(x' )Z
'. (31)
where H is the function described by (23). Elaboration gives
H, = - 4{(g , +g2X)Y' +(1 -Ir2y)x'11[(x')z+ (y'lW and using relations (24) and (26b) this ca n be wrillen as
H, = -4g l !(x'y"-x"y') = - 4g l !(b-aa)2 According to the solution (34), the value of gz is positive and this indicates that H, is nega tive for every point of the extremal. So the result is H , <0,
for every a .
(38)
Therefo re, the Legendre condition is satisfied and th e extremum involved is presumably a maximum. However, compliance with the Legendre condition is not yet sufficient for the soluti on to be a maximum. It is also necessary thaI the Jacobi condition is satisfied. Jacobi conditiOIl
The second point of investigation is to ve rify whether the Jacobi condition is sa tisfied. According to the theory no extremum, maximum or mi nimum, exists when a function II. defined below, vanishes in a point of the extremal between Band F. The function 1/ is defined by (39a)
with II,
= y'x. ~x'y.
(39b) (39c)
whe re x.' etc. are partial derivatives of the functions (25) with respect to the integration constants a and b. The constants C, and C l are to be chosen in such a manner that for the point B, corn' mon to al l extremals, the values of 1/ and 1/' are as follows: (40)
Elaboration of II, and
I/l
with eq uation (25) gives 11= (~aC,
+ C1 )
(b~aa)
in which the constants C, . Cl ca n be solved by use of relations (40). It is then found that 1/
=
(a~a8)
(b
~
Cla )f(b - ClBa)
(41)
The function /I expressed by equation (4 1) vanishes in the cusp point Q, because there il equals ilO "", bla) (sec equation (28». If, therefore, the extremal BF contains the cusp Q, the Jacob i condition is viola ted and neitber a maximum nor a minimum exists at all.
84
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
CALCULUS OF VAR IATIONS TO VERTICAL CU T OFF IN COHESIVE, FfUCTIONlESS SOIL
13
Weierstrass condition The third point of investigation is the Weierstrass £ function, which indicates whether an extremum is weak or strong. For the curve determined here, this investigation could be omitted because tile violation of the Jaeobi condition already showed that no extremum for It is involved at all. However, the analysis of the E-function is mentioned here for completeness. The Weierstrass's E function is defined by E(x, y; x', y'; i',
where x', y' are the derivatives of the computed ex tremal and i', y' are the derivatives of another comparison curve. The extremum is strong when the sign of E is independent of the magnitude of (i' - x') and (ji' - y'). It is weak when the sign of E is constant only for small values of (i' - x') and (y' - y'), but changes if the values are large. A nega tive value of E corresponds to a maximum. a positive value to a minimum. Elaboration of the Efunction for H defined in equation (23) results in
+ g,x)x' -( I - K,Y)Y'] [arc tan (jo' Ii') -arc tan (y' lx') + (i')1' _ x'y') (x'" +y" ')] +[(gl +glX) (i' - x')-O- gzy) (y' - y')} [arc tan (j"li')- arc tan (y' lx'») Fo r small values of(i' -x ) and (Y' - y') it is found that E is negative. This indicates that a E .. (gl
mallimum is involved. However, the presence of the term arc tan (Y'/.'f) creates the possibility that the sign of E changes for a comparison eurve with arbitrary .'t', Y' values. Therefore, the computed curve would produce a weak maximum for h, if the Jacobi condition had not been violated. DISCUSS ION OF THE RESULT
The re sult of the variational analysis is an elltremal in the form of an involute. Its mathematical Cllpression is given in parameter form by equations (25). The constants a, b, gl' g2 in these ex pressions have the values (34). The shape of tile line is shown in Fig. 3 as the line BP.QF. The involute is an extremal because it satisfies in every point the Euler condition (equation 22). It is an extremal of the class of potential slip lines that contains the real slip line. This is achieved by defining integrals that impose similar conditions of total and local equilibrium in the limit stress slale on the lines of that class as are satisfied by the real slip line. The extremal, represented by the line BP.QF, is unique. It is the only involute that satisfies the constraints (2 1b and c) and the boundary conditions in Band F. The corresponding height of the vertical cut off has the value h... 1 '" 3'783cl y, which is high, but could be a valid bound for the collapse height, h,.u. All these points are in favour of the analysis al\d suggest that it is an attractive method of slip line determination. There are, however, some disappointments. Verification of the conditions for the extrem um in the previous section ( Investi gation of the solution) shows that the analysis produces a weak maximum in genera!. whereas in the special case that the extremal contains the cusp point Q, there is no extremum at all. These verification results indicate that the analysis is apparently not meaningful. But before th is conclusion can be drawn, it is necessary to consider these two points in more detail. Weak maximum
When a maximum is involved, this means thaI the value of h'm! is higher than every value of h corresponding to any line of the class investigated. When this class contains the real slip line,
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
85
14
O. DE JONO
then h. m, is larger than the height corresponding 10 the real slip line, which presumably is the collapse height, hcoll - So being a maximum, the computed height he .. , is an unsafe estimate for h,.II' lt is essentia l for this conclusion that the class contains the line that produces heon - If, for instance, a class is considered that gives for all Jines values lowel than hcoli • it would be interesting to es tablish the maximum o f thai class. T hi~ wOIlIe! give the beu. <;afc v:'I l"e for h. In the ca~ considered here, the real slip line, if such a line exists, is still in the class because the stress disTri· butions of the lines in the class satisfy the same equilibrium conditions as the stress distribution along the rea l slip linc. T herefore a maximum corresponds here to an unsafe estimate. The maximum is called weak in variational te rms. This means that it is a maximum with regard to comparison lines that deviate from the extremal only in such a manner that their inclination is almost the same. As a consequence another maximum or even a minimum cou ld exist fo r completely different lines. In textbooks examples are given of unexpected shapes in this respect, consisting of discontinuous solutions. The examination of discontinuous solut ions has not beer ""':"Cted exhaustively for the problem of the slip line analysis. Only the case was consider~ . two involutes with a discontinuous second derivative, forming a smooth S -shaped curve. Such a curve has piecewise di fferent values for the circle centres XM' YM and so according 10 (21) the Lagrange multipliers g" gl are not constant along the line. Since these multipliers have to be constants, such an S shaped curve cannot be an extremal. There are other possibilities for discontinuous solutions. It could be envisaged to study a combination of slip lines consisting piecewise of conjugate stress characteristics. However, such explorations were not pursued. No eXlremwn al all
In the previous section (Investigation of the solution) it is established that an ex tremal consisting of an involute violates the Jacobi condition if the line contains the cusp point Q. It is possible that for embankments or slopes with other boundary conditions the cusp is avoided. For the particular case of the vertical cut off, the cusp is not avoided and is located within the integration interval of the extremal. This indicates that in this particular case no extremum is associated wi th the extremal. Bcing an extremal means that the line satisfies in every point the Euler condition (22). This is necessary for the line to give an extremum, but not yet sufficient. It is also necessary tha i the line satisfies the Jacobi condition and if that second condition is violated, then aecording to the variational calculus no extremum is involved at al l. Since this conclusion seems curious, it is revealing to mention some additional computations that can be reproduced readily to verify the lack of extremum. To that end it is convenient to consider smooth 5 sha ped lines, consisting of two circles, that have the same langent in theiT meeting point. The integrals (2 I a-c) can be evaluated in closed form for such curves. For every height of the meeting point there is one unique combination of cirdes that satisfies the constraints (2 1b and c) and the boundary conditions in B and F. The valufs of" corresponding to these 5 shaped lines are above or below homl fOl lines with a meeting point respectively above or below y:::::-0·33". By this verification it is established tha t the class of potential slip lines is not limited in a meaningful manner. Apparently the conditions of total and local equilibrium of the limit stress state along a line are not restrictive enough. This is further substantiated by an examination of the stress state in the vicinity of the point B. The stress state in the line should be compatible with the stress-free ve rtical boundary Be. Compatibility can be verified by introducing a fan of stress characteristics centred in B. The result is that the S shaped li nes wit h a meeti ng point above y = 0·17h are unacceptable because the stresses near B sur pass the limit stress stale, and
86
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
CALCULUS OF VARIA TIONS TO VERTICAL CUT OFF IN COHESIVE, FRICTIONLESS SOIL
15
this limits the height for 5 shaped slip line!; to h~3·69cJy . We will not elaborate this point here further because 5 shaped curves have no special status. They were arbitrarily chosen for convenience to verify the absence of an extremum. Another example of a line Ihat mighl be called an extremal because an Euler eq uation is satisfied, but apparently produces no valid extreme value for h, is encountered in the analysis of Baker and Garber ( 1978). In Ihal analysis the procedure is to dete rmine the critical slip line by eORsidering an extremal, with the location y(x) and the normal stress distribution o-'(x) as the two relevant variables. The stationary value of the integral is determined with respect to these two variables, by two Euler equations. The first involves 0- and 0-', the second involves y and y'. The authors surmise that satisfaction orthe first Euler equation only is enough for a line to form a useful bound for the critical sUp line. Their solution reduces to a circle for the case ora frictionless soil. In fact, this solution is only a regular extremal if also the second Euler equation is satisfied. Introducing the cirde in this relation gives a differential equation for the normal stress 0- which determines the distribution of 0-. Now the curious situation occurs that for the vertical cut off it is impossi ble to find a ci rclethat satisfies Ihe boundary conditions and the constraints, possessing in addition a normal stress distribution that corresponds to the second Euler equation. So there exis ts no circle that can be claimed to be a regular ex tremal. h is possible to indicate circles that satisfy moment equilibrium only and to adjust the normal stress distribution in such a ma nn er that the other two constraints of vertical and horizontal force equilibrium are satisfied. But then the second Euler equation is violated. This class of circles has a minimum hcight corresponding to h m ,. = 3"8c/y. From the theory of plasticity it is known that this height is an upper bound based on a kinematically admissible velocity field. So all ci rcles correspond to heights that are above h
Real slip line Up to this point it has been assumed that there exists a real slip line and that the collapse state is sufficiently characterized by considering the stresses along that line only. For the variational analysis it is a conveRient assumption because th e analysis is then restricted to the determination of the shape of one line and the elementary variational calculus provides all tools for such a determination. The one-line assum ption is, however, questionable because satisfying equilibrium and limit stress state along one line does not guarantee that the stress states in all other points of the soil body are within acceptable limits. An example of considering regions outside the line was mentioned above wi th regard to 5 shaped curves and the regio n in the vicinity of B. But one small region is no! enough. For a line to be considered a potential slip line it is necessary to ve rify the entire soil body. Possibly the disappointments revealed by evaluating the results of the variational ana lysis in this study are due to an inadequate formulation of the proble m. The collapse state may be associated wi th a distribution of stress characteristics and regions of slip lines of a more complex character than assumed so far. Characterizing the stress state and the Sliding mechanism may require the formulation of a more sophisticated system of integrals before the calculus of variations can be used meaningfully.
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
87
16
G. DE JONG
CONCLUSION
The variational calculus seems an intriguing tool for investigating slope stability problems. The formulation of th e problem by defining a class oflines satisfyin g total and local equilibri um and assuming that the ell(rernal or that class is the real slip line is unsati sfactory. T he class is nOI specified in such a manner that a bound is found for the real slip line, and it is even questionable whether or not there exists one single real slip line at collapse. The analysis based on total and local equili brium of a single line leads to a weak maximum (or no extremum at all)and thorefore il produces unsafe predictions for slope stability problems. REFERENCES Baker, R. &. Garber, M. (1977). Variational approach to ~lopc $Iability. Prl)(:. N;nl~ In' , ConI. Soil Mu~ . Fdn Engng, Tokyo 3/2, 9- 12. Baker. R. &; Garber. M. (1978). Tlleo'e!ical analysis of!lIe s!abili!y of slopes. Gbmc/m;que 28. No.4, 395-411. 801o:a. O. (1973). LU I"res On 'ht calculliso/''Ildo'ioM. New York: Chelsea Pobl ishing Company. Paslor. 1. (1978). Analyse limite: D
88
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
A variational fa llacy G. DE JOSSELIN DE JONG" directly. but an independen t study b~ Gibson & Morgenstern. which was rather simi lar in character and also resulted in logarithmic spira ls. Their analysis was examined by a mathematician who drew altention toa subt le fa!1ac~ in their reasoning. II was shown that such curves are notlimi tati,·c, but on ly ha ye the propeTl~ that the momcnt is indcpen· dent ofthe nonnalstrcssdistribution. l t was pointed out thai the method break s dow n. but how this is related 10 a defecl in the variational scnse was not explained. Neithertheir ,,·ork norlhe refutation of it was ever published, but rer~rence to it was given by Morge nstern (1971) in his gene ra! report at Ihe Tokyo Conference. The essence: of the defect is that a degenerate functiona l is involYed. Th is can be readily verified since Pctrov's (1968) book appcall:d. In this book, Sections 29 and 30 arc devoted to degenerate cases (which are hardly COII$;dered ;n other textbooks) a nd their properties are extcnsively treated. The degenerat ions are classified according to the theory 01" Kroto .... who dishDgulshes Ii ...e kmds. Pet rov'S description is foUowed here. For Ih e deta ils of the slipline ana lysis it is convenient to refer to Baker & Garbds (! 978) paper. Their treatment is a modification of Kop;\csy's 1961 ana l~is. improved by the introduction of a sarety factor. The essential defect is not removed and the Il:su lt is still a logarithmic spint!o The intermediate runction g, defined byequation (9.1) in the paper by Baker & Ga rber, has two variables: the nonnal stress distribution ""xl and the height of the slip surface y(x). The functional is degenemte, because 9 does not contain II (a prime indicates a derivatil·c with respect to x)a nd is linear in ) 1. In the Krotovscnse Ihisereates adegcneration of the third kind with respect to both ~ and )'. In Petrov's book the simullaneous OCCurren,"", of two degenerations is not tll:aled. but it ca n be expected tha i such a combi nation reinforces the degenerate character, rather tha n ameliorating the situation. Consider thcll:fore on ly 11. Because ortbe ahscnce of lithe funct ional G, defined by equa tion (9.1), haS its extreme value only for particular
It is unfortunate thaI valuable in formation ooncerning fallacies in soil mecllanics can get los t in the course of time. This has happened with Ihe usc of variational calculus in slope stability problems. The variationa l method, for detennining the cri tical slip surface as the surface that minimizes the load at rupture. was presented in soil med1anics by Kopacsy (1957, 1961). He published in the 1957 London eonfell:nce a tllrec-dimensional solulion. and in the 196 ] Paris confell:noe the two-dimcn sional venion of it. The shape of the surface is suitably established in the 1957 paper by voctor ana lysis and described by equation (16) of tha t paper which. wilh defined by equatiOD (20). can be eKpresse wjlh a plane Ihrough the line PQ, which connccls P 10 its projection Q on an axis along II vector ii. fixed in space. This plane is further tilted wi th respect to Ii b}· an angle. which isequalto the angle between the lines PQand PI!.. with I!. located on til(, axis of Ii at a consta nt dist ance of magnitude (X.pl,{p./.
w
" Un;'''I"$;t)· of Technology. Delft.
89
290
Fig. I.
TECHNICAL NOTE
Kopksy'. solution
distribut ions of
<1.
and the possibility exists Ihal
discrete jumps bc::twe<,:n Ihese distributions arc involved . [n o rder 10 establish these distributions it is necessary 10 investigate g•• (the seco nd partial derivative with respecllO ,,). But {} is only linear in tJ.
so g•• vanishes. In that case there is only an
cX!rcmu m of G (maximum or minim um) if IT is bounded, and the extreme va lue is obtained by
giving (J one o f Ihe bounding values. to Ihe mechanical senS!: 11 is not bounded, because Sirt'SS stales arc lim ited in SlresS space by a cone. wh ich widens wilh increasing values of o. There: is no rnuimum value for <1 and there is no upper bound. Therefore. no extremum exists and the method breaks down. There is a lower bound fo r 11, which is zero for cohesionlcss soils or tensile if there is cohesion. This lower bound is irre levan! hen:. because i! produces no valid so lu!io n for the entire slip su rface. A! this poi nl i! can be concluded Iha! Kopacsy's analysis is nOI meaningful. because a func!i on~l is
90
considered which has a degcnera le character and possesses no minimum. Th is is due 10 his par!icu lar formula!ion oflhc slope s!abilily problem in terms oflhe varia!io nalcalculus. 1! is unfortunate !hatthc falsification rem~incd unknown. I! would h~vc prevented the reccn! revival of this variational fallacy. REfERENCES Baker. R. & Garber. M. (1978~ Theon:!icalanaly.isoflhe slabilily of slopes. Giouchniqw l8. No.4. 395,,'111. Kop;\csy. J. \1957~ Three-dilllen";onal st",,,, dimibulion and slip ~urrace5 in earth work, 31 ruptun:. Pnx. 4th Int. COtIf Soil. Mm. .• Lom/Otl la. 17. Kopiicsy. 1. (1961~ D istribution ok, contrai nlcs i la rupture. forme dela surfa~ d. glis.. menl el hauleur tiICori'lUC d "" 1al.... Proc. j,h 1m. Con/. Soil M«II.. Pads 6. 23Morgennem. N. R. 1 1977~ hoc. 9th InI.COtIf So/I. M«h.. 1"C>k)"I> 3. 319. Petrov. Ill. P. (l968~ VarimiOtlol "'~Ihodr in opli",,,,,, <:OtI"o/ Ih,,,,"y. New York: Academic P~.
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
R ...... inted from JO\l1I
Consolidation Around Pore Pressure Meters ~ jN .
_
G. DE
I""""'"
DE
101«;
Gt_ _ """i<4, Oodplo_ 25, D
M.",h 26, 1953)
R<SJlOIlO" 01 P"'" ",. .ure ""'er 011 variations in loadin, conditions 01 turnlUndln, "';1 I.....rded by '0 ... COOIoidcwJ:. ri&id type."d • cav,,,,,,,,, 1)'))<. At , . (\ fw unit "q> loading, """oolidation hu Dol y Iot.dif1.!l condition •.
ill."".....'
1. INTRODUCTiON
H E n-..ol tYP"ofpore ~.u,.., ""'t~. in u"" with the Delfl Soil Mechanics Laboratory'" con$lsts of a cylindrical instrument of about 20 em in length and 3,6 em in diameter embedded in the soil masa.. The body of the in.trumenl contain. a diaphragm· type pre5llUre transdueercnnnected by a coe..xial fleJtible cable with the measuring apparalus above $Oil .u rface. The response time of previous nnnelectroni.c Iypt:l amounled to scveral &)'$, beot.usc of the complian~ of the diaphragm a Dd the very grut flow resis\An~ encounte.-.:d in the $Oil by the wale. that b.... tQ acluate the manometer. By C
T
"c.. ;;:i.l3by S. ·Ii ..
N
...... d..
p,",~re-t ... "oduc.r
L.
ODd .I
Boersma. Con ... llioJ Engin....-, DdIt, "The
To . implify the mathematical trealmenl the instrumen l is idealized and instead 01 cyJindrkal symmetry a spberical symmetry isaS$umed. If idulized in this way, the pore pressure meter consists of a spbere with radius " (em). The fGllowipg Iwo typt:l will be CQnside.-.:d. 1.1 The Rigid Type
Here the diaphragm is in contact with a waler ""Iume enclosed in a rigid chanlNr. Holes in the wall fonn the connect",n between this water volume and the water in the po= 'If the soil . We shall represent this Khematically a. a rigid, pervious sphere (Fig . Ia). 1.2 Tbe Cavernous Type Here Ihe diaphragm is in contact witb a wa ter volume tbat fills a cavity in the $Oil. The connection between Ihis waler volume and tbe pore water is direcl . We shall represent Ihis Iochematically .... a spherical cavity (F ig. Ib). Indica ting by av (em') the quanl ity of wa ter na:e!Ilary to account fQ' the defQnnalion 'If the diaphragm under waler pressure, we inttodu~ analog
91
'"
CONSOLIDATION AROUND
P ORE
PRESS URE
METERS
wily that (1.1)
in "'bi<;!> .... (kg/em') indicates t!le pressure in the waler endosed in the sphere. When the surrounding !!Oil m..,.. i. loaded, water pressuru are generated in Ihe p<>Te water and in order that the pore pressure mder may regi$ter this, a volume of water QV must enter the chamber.
For the rigid type Ihe volu me of water enters by percolation through the holes in the wall. This waler can only be supplied by the pore waler squeecd oul of the surrounding !!Oil ma. ... F"r the cavernQUs typl: the volume QV arises principally from the deformation o( the ca.vity, while an additi
......... ... ..... .
2. BOUNDARY CO!W ITIOlfS AT , . "
2.1 W. ter pressure
at
' ''' ' '
The ritid /y;'. 1f we may apply Darcy's law of perc0lation. The "ater volume Q. em' entering through the pervioul wall with a surface area 4.....' is related to the Pl'Q'IUre gradient in the JXlre water iNJ! iH in the 50il a t ,Oo ' .. by the expre5l!ion;
a
(2. LI ) in wbich '}'. (kg/em') denotes the denlity nf water and .. {ern/_} the permesbility nlthe 50il (thepermeabilily of the wall of the JXlre pressure meter is considered large in comparison with .I: nf the ..,il). Since Inr the rigid type toV _Q" we obtain by using (I .I)
-jb1. (&UO!offl- (kh.j(iNJ!(Jrl at
rOo ,.. (2.1.2)
Jphtrial ",vI!y
riqi dperviollS
S,mcn:
Ft<>. I. POfC p ............1.... of ' wo dill...", Iyp<s. 2.2 Soil s keleton
at
rOo T.
In the rj(id Iype the boundary condition at ' _ " is imposed on th e soil skeletnn by the rigidity of the sphere:
... _ 0 at ' _ ' " It is assumed here tbat .... , tbe pmlSUre in the meter, is equal to ... , the JXlre pressuTC in the lOil directly l urrounding the meter, .... (, - •• -O) - ... {. - .o+o). The '_~
tlw.{a..! al} - (1t/'Y.){iJv>!a.) - (all.! al) at
._r..
(2. 1.3)
These expression. relate to the spherically symmetri<::al ~.
In the ease wben the variabl.,. '" and ". are uially I)'tnmetrical and are functions of of (Fig. 2) tbe second member of £<;s. (2.1.2) and (2.1.3) must be integrated over Ihe range O
92
(2.2.1)
In the ''''......",.. Iype the wall of the cavity can d isplace i!$elf freely and the stresses a", determined by the condition that there is equilibrium betWttll the water pressure .... in the cavity and the radial stress in the soil mass a,' (n~ative sign lor compression).
"," --a,-) 0- .,.'
at
''' '0-
(2.2.2)
H ere -~,. indicates the total radial sttellS acting on the soil skeleton aud water combined, 50 we can divide into the radial.t~ on the grains only, and '" lh~ w .. l~r I"=ure in the JXlr.,.t by putting (2. 2.3)
- a:
-a.,
Tb...., stresses act in the $Oil, tha.t is to 1liiY for, > , .. while "," is tbe water pressure in the cavlty ' < '0f W..... II uK"" .uleri>k I" _ . W - ond dutic..,.,_
Olanlt ua<Jcio.ttd wi'" the combined l Y'l<m. -ala' &nd ooil shlet"", OfId "",it it in the ..... of the gniD ... 0000 . \one.
Soil Mechanics and Transport in Porous Media
G. DE lOSSE L 1N
'"
DE lON G
principal.tresses of unequal magnilude: S" S" S•. If we know the inlluence of one principal ItfftS we may obtain by IUpoerpocition tMir combined inHutnee. Tnin. the principal strtSS S in the diRction p _O, . . .e obtain as boundary condition :
al
...... "'.
(l.2)
lIeocause of the simpler lreatment involved ,,·e shall finally derive a IOlution to the cue where a uniform presaure P acts in aU dim::tionl. In luch a cue we have
a."-a,· " at· "- P, •.•• .. ...• ... ...· .0, al
...... ..,.
(3.3)
The condilions (2.1.2), (2.1 .3), (2.2.1), (2.2.2), (2.2.5). (3.1 ), (3.2), a"d (3.3) U1: neeeMU)' and ... /Ii_ cim t Iodetcnnmc thesolution to the problem t.tplicitly in the difle-m.t ases indicaled. 4. SITUIoTIOM AT f_ +0 FOR UNIT STEP W.\I)IMG
It follows from (2.2.2) Ind (2.2.J) that
.... (..-0)_ - ••
+... (.0+0).
(2.2.4)
Nor,....Jly thert! iI no difference betwe<:n .. (•• -0) and ... (.0+0), e..cept when the loading conditions are di .. continUQUI with regard to time, .... for itutane<: at the moment/_O for unit Itep loading. We Iohall treat this !p/!ICial.ituation in Sec." and u.e conditK!n (2.2.2) then. For the (;I.,"" of continuO\l'I~ing conditiono _("-0) equals _(..0+0) and the boundary streM condition
"'"'l. BOUMDARY CON"OITiOMS AT _
(2.2.5) _
We shall UlUme that the dlmetuiono 01 tbe pore prtSIUrt! rneto:r art! 10 sm.all in compa.uon with the distance to the boundary of the lOil rn.ua ,,·hert'in il iI embedded that we may consider the . trcss conditions of Ihe lOil a, homogeneous. To simplify the formulu we Iohall . 110 suppose thai th il homogeno:ou •• trns condition holds uf' to ....... ..,. As th e disturbing effect diminish .. proportional to ,... the errors introduced by th_ ...... mptions an: negligible. In addition we lohaJJ ouppose that in the J\Irroundina: soil ma.u the rate oJ squ..,.in, 001 of port! "1Iter illolow in comparil
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
Becau,"" of its ducidaloTy cbaraclo:r we IhalI ftrst dtttrmine the I"f$JlOM" of the port! preIIUrc meter to unit Itep loadillfl at thc mom..,t of Ioadins (, .. +0) . Thil iI very simply feasiblc by virtue of the following eonsidtralions. By ~eglecting maSS accdtralion and vilQ.lu. retardalion, we shall ouppose, as il ul ual ill Ihe literature on conlOlidation, that any loading incRases inlllntaneoliloly the stresses in the lOil n-, generalinJ!: eluticaJly the ddonnalions that art! theref~ instantanl!Olll too. Asauming that in comparison with the eompr5libility 01 tl>e pain Ikelcton of the IO~ the port! ...ter is incompr5slble, at the instanl of loading no voIu,,", change of the IO~ .iIl take p\a«. This may be ~ by pullinC (U ) where "o is the Poisoon's ratio of the eombined syst ...., water and lOil Ikeleton. As the ",.. tel" iI gnelually u1)tIIed from an element IIlny poi!)t in the loaded toil, the PoiMon's ratio ". al thil poinl dec_ and tendo to the value of " where .«1) is Ihe value of the PoiMon'. ratio of the grain skeleton alone. A result of tome importance concerning tbe value of E· may he derived in the following "'.y. The wato:r mdoled in tbe pores can prt!,-ent volume ch.o.nga. from ottumng, but not &hurin, suains. Thil implies that sha.r s tm. in thc combined syswn is g.rritd by the grain skeleton alone. It follows dim::tly that and hence that the shear moduLi G' and G a rc equal. Then by a "-elI-kn"",,, relation in dalticily theory,
T·_.,
CO. r-.....j 2(1+"O)-E/2(1+.) .. C II all tima,
(4.2)
and in particular
lE" .. P...j(1+.)
at
'00+0.
(4.3)
93
CONSOLIDATION AR OUN D PORE
The relation.. (4.1) and (4.3) enable us to describe the condition at ' " + 0 as R lunction 01 the dasticity constants 01 the grain shlelon E and •. The relations between the stn:sses in the comhined S)'Slem and grain . keleton only, which have already been stated, may be condensed to
-ao_ -a+..
and
T O_
(4.4)
T.
By addmg the nonnal stresses in three perpendicular directions We obtain
- (",' +a,o+",' ).. - (.. ,+",-t ..,)+h>.
PRESSURE METERS
in which a,' etc., indicate th e twincipal stresses in the combmed s)'Stem. With the aid of th.,.., general consideration. we shan proceed to determine the condition.. at 1- +0 in ou r special case.
Under the inlluence 01 the .tr.,.. .ystem (3.2) and the boundary condition lor the ca,-ity (2.2.5), the stress distribution in the wil can be determmed by the aid of stress lunction...' We ""all not enlarge 00 these compu_ tations because they are easy toamyout and by applymg the lo!lowmg e:cpreWon for the radial displaceme"t as derived lrom a .Iress function, ofo:
A. the volume dilatation " which is known 10 be equal to . - (1- 2.)(a,+",+",J/E, (4.5) is zero at 1_ +0, we obtain, by virtue of the fact that
effectively the actual water pn:ssu~ ;n the pores 01 the soil. In the case 01 spberically . ymmetriW stress P at mfinity all expressions have a simpler fonn, and it is easy to verify that the boundary condilions (2.2.2) and (3.3) a~ satisfied, together with those of equilibrium and compatibility, by takmg U, _ -[(l+"o)/2E*]{P- IOt)(r.'/i') -[(1- 2. 0 )/E*]Pr _ - (P-w,),o'/4Gi',
[(6-S.0l+5(.b'- 5)OOS't](,';, )'-[3- 9 COS't]('';' )' ) S . (4.8)
In this expression .... is the pressure in the water contained in the ca.vity and caused by the volume change ~V, which is, in tum, caused by the displ.a.cement of tbe wall 01 the cavity. We may obtain av by integnlotion over the ou rfa.ce of the !!phere
-~V_
the reader may verify that
(4.7)
(4.10)
<1,0 -
-
p+ (P-",.)(. o,I.)',
(4.13)
(4.14)
By the use of (4.1 ) and (4.2) il lollows lhat
",' - - P- !(P-w,)(,oI,)'.
-a v.. 4n.'[-is+WoJ/W
By virtue 01 the identity 01 (4.10) and (4. 13) the resulting waler pre5SUre 01, in the instrument is the same u given by (4.1 2) with P- iS. The water ptes&u~ in Ihe soil mlW il$df is w--Ha,·+2",o)- 1'. The,.., is Iherefo~ a jump in the water pressure at ' _ " ,,-itlt a magnitude 01 t I'lG. It follows thudo,.., that, the water gradient iiwjiJ. is mfinite at Ihat surface an d percolation .tarl5 with infmite velocity giving a vertical slope of the water pressure .egistued by the meter as a function of time. The ""me effect OC(:U ... in the rigid type, but m this case the .tarting point lor the water P""'""U"" at 1_ +0 is zero, because no mcre:t.S
... 4n.'[ -lS+w.J/-IG.
(U I)
However, we ha ve a relatwn (1.1 ) betw..,,, lI V and ..... by which we may diminate av obtaining:
w, - lS/II HbG ).
(" .12)
T his result indicates that the cavernous po~ pressun meter l'egiSle ... a presMl ~ of nearly IS"" long"" b is small in comparison witb I/ G. As in the newest type b is 01 the order 01 I/ IOOG, where G is the s1,ear modulus 01 Ihe . Iiff""t day we have to deal with, the error ;nvolved is less than 1 or 2 per<:mt. We have >bOWD in (4 .6) LhILt the WILler V""".He in the pores of the soil is one-third of the Sum 01 the principal stresses. The~fore, neglecting the influence of the denominator 01 (4.12), it follows that the water prt:ssure, as measured by the cavernous type meter, is
5. DETBRMINATION OF THB CONSOUDATION PROCESS AROUND THE PORE PRESSURE METER
To determine the water pressu", registered by the meIer as a funclion of lime we need .. oollJOlidation theory in J dimensions. Such a thoory has been de"eloped by BioI.' For the co.se of saturaled soil the buic ~ualion is derived in the form (5.1)
".compressibility coefficient _ (1 - 2.) (1 + , )/(1- .)E (cm'lkg,) k _ permeability (em/sec), 'r~ _ de""ity of waler (kg/em'), . _ volume dilAtation of grain skeleton, and I_ time. Tbe physical meaning of this result may lie appreciated if we consider the well_known ,..,Iation from elasticity' in wbich ~uilibrium and compatibility conditions a,.., tahn inlo aCCQUnt,
(l/ a)V'_+(ax/ oJx)+ (oJY /ay)+(az/a,) _ o.
(5.2)
The body forces X, Y, Z in our ca.", a,.., furnished by Ihe water gradients X_ -iJoc/iJx elc., SO that
(5.3) Now, by e%lending Darcy's law of percolation to the case of 3 dimensions it is easy \ 0 deduce Ihat the rate of increase ol volume a_/at necessary to 510,.., th e excess of waler at a cerain point is given by (5.4) A combination of (5 .3) and (5.4) givt$ the buic tion (5. 1).
~ua·
In order to obtain an ag!"«Bble t....,.un.."t of the problem we shall consider simple harmonic loading condillons for ....... ..,. P .. Pu;p (iwl) in condo (J.3). • M. Bioi,}. Awl. Ph,... 12, ISS (1141). 19&
's.e nt.""'.. I, p.
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
All variabll:$ inRuenced by this harmonic eflect as for insanee t, will be wrill.." __ i cxp(i<.I). So W~ can divide all expression~ throughout by exp(iwl) and reain the overdashed characters. We get for (5.1 ) in th ~ ca", of axially symmetrica.l. streu disttib~tion
". _ -;11 ~r~(".'.) ~(''"?) a, ar +_' siruf i¥ i¥ l'-'" whe,..,
(5.5)
'1'-;..,
k ' (",)
which has the solutions • .. ,..-I[ A,] .+1 (; .....)+ ,1.." ,.+I(i..... )}Io.,
(5.6)
where] and N denote, respe<:ti"ely, I.kssel and Neu manns functions" and 'i' ~n
(5.7)
in which S a,.., polynomials in (1/ .....) .• Th;s~uation for .permits us tocompute Ihe solution to the axial symmetrical problem Ihat arises when introducing the tru e fonn o(boundary conditions. For insance location 01 the holes On rigid type, upper part of the cavity fonned by the instrument, etc. Computation would th.." require a treatment with many .lreo;.s functions derived from (5.?) by
.- ((1- 2. )(1+ _)/ E] tc~a/ a, -sim/-r'oJ/i¥JV'1>. • Jahnke and Emd<, TMk, vi N ... YorI< , 11145), pp. t4l, t46 . ' s.., "'<~ 4, p. 101. ' s.e nterul" 4, p. 136.
I" general: in all cases, wh~", the solution of . tress distribution under ,tatk [ooding ;. known as derived from ' IUS/! functions, the consolidation problem is ..,ived by replacing thedilatation -'lress funct;"". which satisfy t"v>¢._ O by COm!$l'onding functions 01 the form (5.7). The function. ~ _ o need no alterations, beca.use ;: _ 0 also satisfies (5.5), neither the rotation_ stress-Functions, We shan limil oursekes, how~\'er, to the S;ause thi.. leads 10 a simplification in the treatment. The lAme solution far w. as" function of time i. then obtained for 3 equal.\~ (P-is) at ...... '" as well as for I principal stress (S) then:. Th is conclusion has already .been proved for the situation at 1_+0 for unit l""ding (""" the idC"l1tity of (4.10) and (4.13» and that it hohls here may he accepted without proof. 6. SPHERICAL S ... MMETR ...
T he solution neffie
._..1..-' e~p( - qr).
(6.1)
We shall nOI use a stress functiCIIl now, bul u, as basic variable as all Slresses and boundary condition. can be wriuen as functions of N. by virtue of the symmetry. for insla nce i - ..-'it/a.-(u,"», which giv~ alter integration: il, _ -A[(q' )-'+(qr)->] exp(-q. )-Br'.
(6.2)
In orner to describe the boundary conditions with il, we muSI firstly disf'O$<' of ,z,. This is s imp le by virtuc of (5 .3) which can be written (1/0)<"'/&">(;. )_&'/&">(..... ), and whkh after integration becomes (I/ a)i - u.-C,-Cr' . We mayomillh e lerm Cr', which conlributes a waler· How radiating from a point !lOllTCe al Ihe origin and i. irrelevant here. Therciore, il 10110""5 thai (l/a)i -tOl -C or -Gl _ C+(I/
We can now uP""'" the boundary couditions in terms 01 ii,. For the rigid type weueffi: (2.1.2), (2.2.1), (3. 1), and (3.3). For thecavemou stype : (2.1.3), (2.2 .5), (3.1), and (3.3). The condition (3. 1) is almldy ""tisf,"" by making A,- ;A" in {S.6}. There then remain three COnditions to be sati!fied for each type. The integration co""talll5 to adjust are J and B in (6.2), and C in {6.3}. It can be "erified that their values all:
If .. - P!/Vro' np{qr.)/N, B - Pllw.'[v.'-I',)(q ••)'+(qr. )+ I ]lN, C- p with N - [J. (qro)'+(qr.)+I], whell: 1' '" 1'' 1' _ 1',
for rigid type _ h/3a, for cavernOU$ type - b/3d+[(I- .)/2(1-2 . )].
With th= values we obtain f'nally for the water pressure,;:.. al • ., (that is the pressure regi.tered by the meltr)
r.
:;:.• - P/I-(b!30)(qr,)'/N ).
(6.6)
The complex "alue of q [see (5.5)] leads toacomple>: "alue of :::...... heing oul of pha.., with P. In F ig. 4 is ,;hown the rdation toetw""u P and ,;:. in the cample. plane aa Q function of the fn::quon
'f'~ ofitr-C----J",. exp(i.:.,t)
It"t- -
2..; __
'"
(6.7)
Putting .r·o in a more manageable (orm
(6.3)
Also ii, and ii,' may be written in terms of Q, in the following way :
which is VIIlid far all 1>0, where P_value of step loading It ..... .., a - (I+(J-~) 1)l2p..
fJ-(I- (I-4}1)1]l2P..
Selected Works of G. de Josselin de Jong
erfCf- 2"~'f· exp(-),'jA, ' -"/4'Y~
•
(_ (5 .1)).
For the de(,nition of,. _ (6.5) and of bl l<> ,.... (I. I) and (5.1). Puuinl!._}l, and 1_0 the ezp~ (6.9) reduUl 10 (4. 12). Since ~ is Imall in COmparilOn .. ith Ja the expression (6.9) for the rigKI type bttomes appro~ima t ely
....- Pf l - ezp(,.....1j erfe(,.o.J)IJ (6.10)
97
3a/13
Application of Stress Functions to Consolidation Problems Application des Fonctions d'Ai ry aux Problemes de Consolidation by G.
JOSSI'UN DI! JON(), Ir., Sub-dircctor of 'he Soil M echanic$ labora,ory, l}elrt, Ne,bot13nd.
<.a><
surf"",. comid<"';00. ...... porviou>~.
A useful """hoo in .Ia>lici'y for delUmining OIress-d.i>lri· butions is the appli(".Ouion 01 SIr... l\U\<'linns , In or<\<, t o ... 'i«y the C
(n From tbeot lunetitms ,he .......... l lId strain •• ,. oblainehown (by RAVl.l lClI. 1894: I......... I~S) in the case of vibMions type:< of " ..... funetion are n«mle p=co '"'tDcII, by ,hei, UOdienu. aCl '" body fo""," onthe..,il. IIIw been sb<>wn (""J."..., ... ", w J=, 1953) 1m"" Ihis con· ceptK'" """" 'u B"'·.··. (1941) w"i< "'I_,iyn f'" 'vn .... U~ •• iun ;n Ihree dimensio ...
,wo
,ha,
Le -"Ibn< do> (ollOllons de 1<nsioa DCCdSlirc .. oulIi>aDI pou, leo problCmca lie consolidation, .. qme,ric uial< ..., lie La pr<miOte .. ra",..,.un'11a OI)Q'I.".,...,.,. Ia _ lla l'OIaboo .. Ia tn>isitm< ~, i Ia
.ro;'.