Plant Breeding Reviews - Raspberry Breeding and Genetics (Volume 32)

PLANT BREEDING REVIEWS Volume 32 Raspberry Breeding and Genetics

edited by

Jules Janick Purdue University

PLANT BREEDING REVIEWS Volume 32

Plant Breeding Reviews is sponsored by: American Society for Horticultural Science Crop Science Society of America Society of American Foresters National Council of Commercial Plant Breeders International Society of Horticultural Science

Editorial Board, Volume 32 Harvey K. Hall Kim E. Hummer

PLANT BREEDING REVIEWS Volume 32 Raspberry Breeding and Genetics

edited by

Jules Janick Purdue University

Copyright # 2009 by Wiley-Blackwell. All rights reserved. Wiley-Blackwell is an imprint of John Wiley & Sons, Inc., formed by the merger of Wiley’s global Scientific, Technical, and Medical business with Blackwell Publishing. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, 201-748-6011, fax 201-748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/ go/permission. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages. For general information on our other products and services or for technical support, please contact our Customer Care Department within the United States at 877-762-2974, outside the United States at 317-572-3993 or fax 317- 572-4002. Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic formats. For more information about Wiley products, visit our web site at www.wiley.com.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: ISBN 978-0-470-38674-3 ISSN 0730-2207 Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Contents

Contributors 1. Dedication: Derek Jennings and Hugh A. Daubeny Berry Breeders Extraordinaire

vii 1

Kim E. Hummer, Rex Brennan, S. Nikki Jennings, Brian Williamson, and Harvey K. Hall I. II. III. IV.

Derek Jennings Selected Publications of Derek Jennings Hugh A. Daubeny Selected Publications of Hugh A. Daubeny

2. Raspberry Breeding and Genetics

2 16 21 33

39

Harvey K. Hall, Kim E. Hummer, Andrew R. Jamieson, S. Nikki Jennings, and Courtney A. Weber I. Introduction II. Germplasm Resources, Exploration, and Maintenance III. Breeding Technology IV. Breeding Systems V. Breeding for Specific Characters VI. Achievements and Prospects Acknowledgments Literature Cited

45 75 90 135 153 309 314 315

Subject Index

355

Cumulative Subject Index

357

Cumulative Contributor Index

377

v

Contributors

Rex Brennan Fruit Breeding Group. Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, Scotland Harvey K. Hall Zealand

Shekinah Berries Ltd, 1 Clay Street. Motueka 7120, New

Kim E. Hummer USDA-ARS Clonal Germplasm Repository, 33447 Peoria Road, Corvallis, Oregon, 97330-2521, USA Andrew R. Jamieson Fruit Breeding, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 32 Main Street, Kentville, Nova Scotia, B4N 1J5, Canada S. Nikki Jennings Mylnefield Research Services Ltd, Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, Scotland. Courtney A. Weber Department of Horticultural Sciences, Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, NY 14456, USA Brian Williamson Fruit Breeding Group. Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, Scotland

vii

Derek Jennings

Hugh A. Daubeny

1 Dedication: Derek Jennings and Hugh A. Daubeny Berry Breeders Extraordinaire Kim E. Hummer USDA–ARS Clonal Germplasm Repository 33447 Peoria Road Corvallis, Oregon 97333–2521 USA Rex Brennan, S. Nikki Jennings, and Brian Williamson Fruit Breeding Group Scottish Crop Research Institute Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA Scotland Harvey K. Hall Shekinah Berries Ltd. 1 Clay Street Motueka 7120, New Zealand I. DEREK JENNINGS, 2 A. Early Years, 2 B. Early Career, 3 C. Scientific Collaborations, 4 D. Career Successes, 5 1. Raspberry 2. Blackberry 3. Hybrid Berries and Other Rubus Fruits 4. Strawberry

Plant Breeding Reviews, Volume 32 Edited by Jules Janick Copyright & 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1

2

KIM E. HUMMER, ET AL.

E. Cultivar Releases, 8 1. Raspberry 2. Blackberry 3. Hybrid Berry 4. Purple Raspberry 5. Strawberry F. Current Activities, 15 G. Awards and Honors, 15 II. SELECTED PUBLICATIONS OF DEREK JENNINGS, 16 A. Journal Articles, 16 B. Book Chapters and Books, 20 C. Cultivar Releases and Patent, 21 III. HUGH A. DAUBENY, 21 A. Early Years, 21 B. Early Career, 23 C. Scientific Collaborations, 24 D. Career Successes, 25 E. Cultivar Releases, 27 F. Current Activities, 30 G. Awards and Honors, 32 IV. SELECTED PUBLICATIONS OF HUGH DAUBENY, 33 A. Journal Articles, 33 B. Book Chapters, 36 C. Cultivar Release Notices, 36

This volume of Plant Breeding Reviews is dedicated to two extraordinary breeders who, with a combination of enthusiasm and expertise, have done much to change the raspberry industry. Both led the way in widening the genetic base of Rubus breeding programs and have encouraged international exchange of plant material and information. Their outstanding cultivar releases have foreshadowed the recent successes of the industry and are highly valued by raspberry breeding and growing programs throughout the world. Their collaborations have inspired the next generation of breeders and researchers to share information for international mutual benefit.

I. DEREK JENNINGS A. Early Years Derek Jennings was born in 1929 and grew up in Cardiff, Wales. His association with the principality continued when he obtained his first degree from the University College of Wales in Aberystwyth, in 1950.

1. DEDICATION

3

After graduating, Derek went abroad for his first job. He was appointed as plant breeder to the East African Agriculture and Forestry Research Organization, in which capacity he was posted to Tanganyika (now Tanzania). There he worked in the breeding of maize (Zea mays), groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea), and Sorghum, and in 1952 he was given responsibility for the cassava (Manihot esculentum) program. The program started in 1937, and aimed to transfer resistances to two viruses from several tree species into cassava, which has an important role as a staple food crop in eastern Africa. The work was pioneering at the time, and Derek was responsible for introducing the resistant selections, by this time third backcrosses, to native farmers. At this stage, the resistance failed in some parts, and Derek soon found the cause to be host-virus interactions. He also discovered the breeding combinations that restored the resistance. During this early period in his career, Derek traveled throughout Tanzania lecturing in Swahili. He is regarded as an authority on cassava to this day. Unfortunately, changes in administrative affairs led to the discontinuation of the cassava breeding program in 1956, and Derek returned to the United Kingdom the following year. However, before doing so, Derek distributed the elite cassava germplasm he had generated in the breeding program to many African countries to ensure that others could benefit. This generosity of spirit led to Derek being invited, in 1975, to work for 6 months at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture in Nigeria, using the germplasm he had distributed 20 years previously. In 2002 he contributed an invited chapter on cassava breeding for a Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux International (CABI) reference book. B. Early Career Derek’s moved back to the United Kingdom in 1957 to take up the post of raspberry breeder at the Scottish Horticultural Research Institute, later to become the Scottish Crop Research Institute (SCRI), in Dundee, Scotland. The institute opened in 1953, and the pomology department was under the leadership of Conway Wood when Derek joined. The department’s work was aimed at addressing the decline in raspberry yields caused largely by viral infections in the Tayside area of Scotland. Conway Wood had previously bred raspberries as assistant to Norman Grubb at East Malling before moving to SHRI, and there were four assistants in the group, including Malcolm Anderson, who later became the blackcurrant breeder at SCRI.

4

KIM E. HUMMER, ET AL.

C. Scientific Collaborations Derek formed several key relationships within SCRI. Some of the most significant scientific ones were with the pathologists Brian Williamson and Teifion Jones, with whom he investigated some important interactions between Rubus germplasm and pathogenic fungi and viruses respectively. The development of cane resistance to Botrytis cinerea and identification of new sources of resistance for breeding was two results of these collaborations, together with progress in breeding for resistance to cane blight (Leptosphaeria coniothyrium) and spur blight (Didymella applanata) through the use of mycelial inoculation techniques developed at SCRI. Additionally, genetic control of resistance to raspberry yellow rust (Phragmidium rubiidaei) depended on whether resistance was immune (major gene) or resistant with a slow-rusting response (minor genes), and the interaction of diseases such as yellow rust and cane spot (Elsinoe veneta) was investigated. Derek and collaborators also investigated the apparent association of gene H, controlling cane pubescence, with increased resistance to cane Botrytis and spur blight but increased susceptibility to cane spot, mildew, and yellow rust. Derek and his coworkers believed that the pubescent canes mature at a different rate from the smooth ones, thereby separating the susceptibilities and resistances to the various pathogens. The gene H region of the raspberry genome continues to be analyzed at the molecular level by Julie Graham’s group at SCRI. With Teifion Jones and entomologists at SCRI, Derek both identified and then introgressed several key aphid resistance genes into the SCRI raspberry breeding germplasm. Raspberry breeding was given great importance at SCRI at this time. The subsequent reduction in viral infections in U.K. raspberry plantations was a major boost to the industry; sadly, resistance-breaking strains within the U.K. aphid population have now largely overcome the existing resistance genes, and so the search has begun again for robust sources of resistance at both SCRI and East Malling Research. Derek also worked extensively with fruit agronomists at SCRI, notably the late Murray Cormack. In this collaboration, they achieved significant progress in the development of cultivars amenable to mechanical harvesting. They also developed information about the dormancy cycle of raspberry that is still used today for fruit production outside the main cropping season. Derek was involved with Harry Lawson in work to determine the best means for cane vigor control. This work was the key to the acceptance of ‘Glen Clova’ as the first of

1. DEDICATION

5

the new raspberry cultivars from SCRI that ultimately transformed the industry in Scotland. Derek traveled widely in the course of his work at SCRI, particularly to visit collaborators in North America. On one occasion during the cold war, Derek traveled with Peter Waister, also of SCRI, on a private trip to the Soviet Union at their invitation—neither he or his family had any advance knowledge of his itinerary or destination, and the men’s flight to Siberia incurred the displeasure of the U.K. Foreign Office. Derek carried out original research in raspberry breeding and registered at the nearby University of St. Andrews. In 1964 he was awarded a Ph.D. for his thesis entitled ‘‘Breeding and Genetical Analysis of Red Raspberry (Rubus idaeus),’’ supervised by Conway Wood. His relationship with St. Andrews continued with his appointment first as honorary lecturer and later as honorary senior lecturer in the Department of Botany.

D. Career Successes 1. Raspberry. Derek’s work at SCRI covered various aspects of Rubus improvement, but the development of new cultivars for the U.K. industry was his main objective and ultimate achievement. Taking on the breeding of raspberry from David Bird, Derek released his first cultivar, ‘Glen Clova’, in 1969, combining high yields with good processing quality, suiting the Scottish industry at the time. ‘Glen Clova’ rapidly became the standard cultivar grown in Scotland, and was also successful for early production in the rest of the United Kingdom. Its position as a standard cultivar for the United Kingdom continued to 2000, when the withdrawal of Dinoseb for primocane management led to its replacement by cultivars with less vigorous primocane growth. The next cultivar release from Derek’s program was ‘Glen Isla’, which had fruit firmness derived from the black raspberry Rubus occidentalis via an East Malling selection. Although not commercially successful in its own right, ‘Glen Isla’ was widely used both by Derek and other breeders as a source of fruit firmness. The next real commercial successes were ‘Glen Prosen’ and ‘Glen Moy’, released in 1982. These two cultivars represented real progress in terms of fruit quality, for both the fresh and processing markets. They were also the first spine-free cultivars in the United Kingdom. As a result, they quickly became the new benchmark for high-quality fruit and are still grown today, albeit on a greatly reduced scale. ‘Glen Moy’ was of particular interest, due to

6

KIM E. HUMMER, ET AL.

its early ripening character, while ‘Glen Prosen’ produced firm fruit with good machine-harvesting ability. The latter cultivar was used widely in breeding and consequently has had a high impact beyond the SCRI program. In his breeding work, a recurring theme is Derek’s great willingness to share germplasm. This led to some important long-term collaborations with other breeders, notably Hugh Daubeny in Canada (‘Glen Prosen’ was used as parental material in the development of ‘Tulameen’), Harvey Hall in New Zealand (SCRI breeding material has featured in the background of many cultivar releases from the Institute of Horticulture and Food of New Zealand Ltd., HortResearch), and the late Graeme McGregor in Australia. In 1985 Derek accepted an invitation to work for 6 months in Victoria, Australia, to study problems relating to raspberry production in a climate warmer than Scotland. During this time he made a major contribution to the breeding program there, particularly in gaining an understanding of the disorder known as blind bud, which is related to the plants’ dormancy cycle in the Australian climate. In 1985 Derek released the cultivars ‘Glen Lyon’ and ‘Glen Garry’ from the SCRI program. Although neither was as successful as his previous releases within the United Kingdom, ‘Glen Lyon’ has become the major cultivar in Spain. This is due largely to its ability to withstand markedly different climatic conditions, together with its firm fruit inherited from ‘Glen Prosen’ and other sources, which makes it ideal for shipping back to other markets, notably the United Kingdom during the period from January to April every year. ‘Glen Lyon’ was originally selected for moderate vigor due to the withdrawal of vigor control chemicals in the United Kingdom, and its success in Spain was not foreseen at the time of release. At this time, Derek’s interaction with Hugh Daubeny in North America was continuing to give benefits to both parties, and ‘Glen Lyon’ has one of Hugh’s cultivars, ‘Haida’, as a grandparent. During his time at SCRI, Derek oversaw the growth of the fruit breeding group at SCRI, and by the time of his retirement in 1989, he was head of the Soft Fruit Genetics Department. In 1994 a group of four cultivars were released from the raspberry breeding program: ‘Glen Magna’, ‘Glen Ample’, ‘Glen Rosa’, and ‘Glen Shee’. Clearly Derek had a pivotal role in their development. Of this group, the most successful cultivar has been ‘Glen Ample’, which in recent years has become the leading cultivar in the United Kingdom and one of only two-main season cultivars, along with ‘Tulameen’, that is accepted by U.K. multiple retailers at the present time. The release of ‘Glen Ample’

1. DEDICATION

7

coincided with a major change in emphasis for raspberry production in Scotland: The largely processing market was generally supplanted by production of high-quality fruit for fresh consumption. The ‘Glen Ample’ cultivar is strongly preferred for its flavor and agronomic traits. After retiring from SCRI, Derek moved to southeastern England, where he formed a partnership with Simon Brice, a leading grower there, through the company Medway Fruits. This gave Derek the opportunity to continue his fruit breeding activities across a broader spectrum of fruits. He concentrated on primocane-fruiting raspberries, instead of the summer-fruiting types previously developed, trailingtype blackberries rather than European types, and strawberries. While each of the Rubus cultivars from SCRI are readily identifiable by the ‘Glen’ prefix, Derek’s new position enabled him to acknowledge the support of his wife Joan and other female members of his family. In 1994, his first release, the raspberry ‘Joan Squire’, challenged the U.K. industry standard for primocane types, ‘Autumn Bliss’. Further releases followed, such as ‘Terri-Louise’ in 1996, ‘Joan J’ in 1999, and ‘Joan Irene’ and ‘Marcela’, both in 2004. Of these, ‘Joan J’ has a significant following in the home garden market, while ‘Terri-Louise’ was for a time marketed as a premium cultivar by one of the main U.K. supermarket chains, due to its very large fruit size. Some of these more recent releases have proved to be popular outside of the United Kingdom; for example, ‘Joan Irene’ is grown commercially in Chile at the present time, and ‘Marcela’ is grown in both Chile and Mexico. 2. Blackberry. In 1988 Derek released the spine-free blackberry ‘Loch Ness’, which has had considerable commercial success worldwide and is still grown extensively in Europe. The semi-erect habit makes ‘Loch Ness’ relatively easy to manage, and the shelf life was also an improvement on existing types at the time of release. After leaving SCRI, Derek concentrated on trailing blackberries of the North American type, and from Medway Fruits he released ‘Adrienne’ in 1995 and ‘Helen’ in the following year. The latter proved the most successful, giving high yields of early fruit. 3. Hybrid Berries and Other Rubus Fruits. Derek’s interest in the various sections of Rubus led him to experiment with hybrid berry production, and from a tetraploid raspberry crossed with ‘Aurora’ blackberry he selected the ‘Tayberry’, released from SCRI in 1979. With its aromatic qualities and unique flavor, ‘Tayberry’ was a big commercial success in both the United Kingdom and North America, particularly with home garden and self-pick growers. Even now, almost 30 years

8

KIM E. HUMMER, ET AL.

after its release, it remains a readily identifiable SCRI product for the general public in the United Kingdom. From a cross between ‘Tayberry’ and a sister seedling, ‘Tummelberry’ was released in 1983 but never reached the popularity of ‘Tayberry’. An improved spine-free ‘Tayberry’ was discovered by Derek in 1996 in a Buckinghamshire allotment, and this was released under the name ‘Buckingham Tayberry’. The spineless purple raspberry, ‘Glen Coe’, a diploid from a cross between ‘Glen Prosen’ and a spineless black raspberry, was released in 1988 and attracted interest from the processing market due to its intense color. Derek developed the spineless black raspberry by introgressing spinelessness from the old raspberry cultivar ‘Burnetholm’ into black raspberry types through crossing, backcrossing, selfing, and sib crossing. Further progress has been made in developing spineless black raspberry types from this germplasm by HortResearch, which released the black raspberry ‘Hortberry1’ under the trademark name ‘Ebony’. 4. Strawberry After leaving SCRI, Derek also brought his expertise to the breeding of strawberry for Medway Fruits, and a number of cultivars were released. ‘Christine’ was released in 2000, and crops earlier than the U.K. standard, ‘Elsanta’; it also has fruit quality acceptable to the supermarkets. As a result, almost 500,000 plants were sold in the United Kingdom in 2007. E. Cultivar Releases 1. Raspberry ‘Glen Clova’ 1969. The origin of this cultivar is complex. It was derived from ‘Burnetholm’, ‘Lloyd George’, ‘Malling Exploit’, ‘Malling Jewel’, ‘Newburgh’, and ‘Preussen’. The cross was performed in 1960; it was selected in 1963 and tested as M9. It has an early and extended season. It produces medium-size conical fruit, of medium-light red color. It is dusty, with moderate firmness and vigorous spreading canes. It is productive and susceptible to leaf spot virus. When grown commercially ‘Glen Clova’ was very good for jam and canning but less popular for frozen or fresh, perhaps due to its slightly acid flavor. ‘Glen Isla’ 1974. The origin of this cultivar is complex. It was derived from ‘Burnetholm’, ‘Cumberland’ black raspberry, ‘Lloyd George’, ‘Malling Jewel’, ‘Malling Landmark’, and ‘Norfolk Giant’. The cross was performed in 1960; it was selected in 1963 and tested as M14. It is a late season cultivar, with round-conical orange-red fruit with regular,

1. DEDICATION

9

small, firm, and cohesive drupelets. It is moderately acid when fresh, but jam is good although slightly acid when grown in Scotland. Fruit acidity was markedly reduced in New Zealand and the Pacific Northwest of the United States and Canada. Cane growth was vigorous and plentiful but they spread into the alleyways early in the season. ‘Glen Esk’. This cultivar was never formally released but trialed widely around the world. Its origin is complex. It was derived from ‘Burnetholm’, ‘Cumberland’ black raspberry, ‘Lloyd George’, ‘Malling Exploit’, ‘Malling Jewel’, and the gene L1 mutant of ‘Malling Jewel’. It was selected in 1969, evaluated in Scotland as M31 and internationally as ‘Glen Esk’. It fruits in late midseason, with a very large long conical fruit with pale orange-red color, with large drupelets and seed and weak flavor. The appearance ‘Glen Esk’ fruit in a punnet was outstanding, but it was not suitable for processing. Canes elongated early, very erect, very vigorous, tall, thick at the base, and grew in adequate numbers. ‘Glen Moy’ 1981. The origin of this cultivar is complex. It was derived from ‘Burnetholm’, ‘Cumberland’ black raspberry, ‘Glen Clova’, ‘Devon’, ‘Lloyd George’, ‘Malling Exploit’, ‘Malling Jewel’, ‘Malling Landmark’, ‘Newburgh’, and ‘Norfolk Giant’. The cross was made in 1972; it was selected in 1976 and tested as SCRI 7210/204. It is an earlyseason cultivar, with good-quality fruit, vigorous canes, spine free, erect, productive, moderately hardy. It contains A1 resistance to Amphorophora idaei and is susceptible to midge blight, leaf spot virus, Phytophthora root rot, and Rubus bushy dwarf virus (RBDV). ‘Glen Moy’ has been widely used parent for earliness and for contribution to earliness in the development of primocane-fruiting cultivars. ‘Glen Prosen’ 1981. The origin of this cultivar is complex. It is derived from ‘Burnetholm’, ‘Cumberland’ black raspberry, ‘Devon’, ‘Lloyd George’, ‘Malling Jewel’, ‘Malling Landmark’, ‘Newburgh’, ‘Norfolk Giant’, and ‘Preussen’. The cross was made in 1968; it was selected in 1976 and tested as SCRI 6820/54. It is a late-season, large round berry with very large chunky drupelets, spineless, with upright canes, moderate vigor, and is hardy for Scotland. It contains A1 resistance to Amphorophora idaei and is susceptible Phytophthora root rot and RBDV. ‘Glen Prosen’ has gained most significance as the parent of the very successful fresh-market cultivar ‘Tulameen’. ‘Glen Yarra’ 1995. This cultivar is a sister seedling of ‘Glen Prosen’. The cross was made in 1968; it was selected in 1976 and tested as SCRI

10

KIM E. HUMMER, ET AL.

6820/64. The cultivar was introduced by G. R. McGregor, of the Institute for Horticultural Development, Melbourne, Australia. It is a midseason, medium-large firm fruit of medium-red color. It is dusty, vigorous, with upright spineless canes, relatively few new primocanes, and relatively low chilling requirement. It is susceptible to Phytophthora root rot. ‘Glen Yarra’ performed well in trials in other parts of the world but was inferior to ‘Glen Prosen’ in most places so it was not released beyond Australia. ‘Glen Garry’ 1990. ‘Malling Delight’  SCRI 7331/1 (SCRI 703/ 36  ‘Glen Prosen’), SCRI 703/36, is of complex origin, derived from ‘Burnetholm’, ‘Cumberland’ black raspberry, ‘Devon’, ‘Lloyd George’, ‘Malling Jewel’, ‘Malling Landmark’, ‘Norfolk Giant’, and ‘Pyne’s Royal’. SCRI 7331/1 contained gene L1 from a mutant ‘Malling Jewel’ selection used in breeding at SCRI. The cross was made in 1975, and it was tested as 7518E6. The cultivar is early to midseason, spineless, very large fruit size due to the presence of the unstable gene L1 . Plants not containing gene L1 could be identified in the vegetative stage by smaller stipules and less serrated leaves. The fruit is long-conic, firm, slightly pale in color, has excellent flavor, and is suited to niche fresh market and home garden use. Plants are high yielding with moderate vigor but with long, strong fruiting laterals. ‘Glen Garry’ carries gene A1 conferring resistance to two strains of the large raspberry aphid but is susceptible to RBDV. ‘Glen Lyon’ 1991. SCRI 7331/1  SCRI 7256–1 (SCRI 6820/35 [sib of ‘Glen Prosen’]  ‘Haida’) is from a cross made in 1975, tested as SCRI 7515C5. It is early to midseason, spineless, with bright, glossy medium red color, medium-size fruit, firm, easily removed from the receptacle. It has low sugar content and high acidity in Scotland but good sugar/ acid balance when produced in southern Spain and Portugal. It has good shelf life, limited use for processing but now is grown in significant plantings in southern Spain and Portugal. The plant establishes rapidly and produces medium to high yields. It has easily managed upright growth and moderate vigor and A1 aphid resistance. It is resistant to spur blight and leaf spot virus but susceptible to RBDV. ‘Glen Ample’ 1994. The origin of this cultivar is complex. It is a derivative of ‘Glen Prosen’, ‘Meeker’, ‘Rumiloba’, ‘Carnival’, ‘Malling Jewel’, ‘Burnetholm’, ‘Malling Landmark’, ‘Malling Exploit’, ‘Lloyd George’, and ‘Pyne’s Royal’. The cross was made in 1978, and it was tested as 7815B8. It is a midseason cultivar, with spineless canes, is high

1. DEDICATION

11

yielding, and is particularly well adapted to fresh-market production in southern Britain. It has medium to large fruit, bright red, round-conic shape, is firm, and tends to break at collar in wet and cool conditions. It is easily removed from the receptacle and can be machine harvested. Canes are upright and vigorous with long, upright laterals. The cultivar has A1 aphid resistance. This cultivar was released from SCRI with Ronnie McNicol. ‘Glen Magna’ 1994. ‘Meeker’  SC RI 7719B11. The origin of this cultivar is complex. It is derived from ‘Rumiloba’, ‘Glen Isla’, ‘Malling Jewel’, ‘Malling Exploit’, ‘Burnetholm’, ‘Devon’ and ‘Malling Landmark’, ‘Cumberland’ black raspberry, ‘Lloyd George’, ‘Norfolk Giant’, and ‘Pyne’s Royal’. The cross was made in 1980; it was tested as 8032A3. The cultivar is late season, very high yielding, with very large fruit, deep red color, long conic shape, and excellent uniform appearance. It is machine-harvestable in some environments. It has excellent flavor with similarities to ‘Glen Moy’ and ‘Meeker’. It is suitable for the fresh market and processing, especially freezing. It has upright, vigorous canes with few spines. The cultivar has A1 aphid resistance and is resistant to RBDV. This cultivar was released from SCRI with Ronnie McNicol. ‘Glen Rosa’ 1994. This cultivar is a sib of ‘Glen Ample’. The cross was made in 1978; it was tested as SCRI 7815A12. It is a midseason, spineless cultivar, with fairly good flavor for processing. It is less suited for the fresh market. It has moderate vigor and production, is moderately upright, and it is adapted for machine harvest. It contains gene H, giving resistance to spur blight and cane Botrytis, and gene A10, giving resistance to four strains of the large European aphid. It is resistant to RBDV. This cultivar was released from SCRI with Ronnie McNicol. ‘Glen Shee’ 1994. The origin of this cultivar is complex. It is derived from ‘Rumiloba’, ‘Burnetholm’, ‘Glen Clova’, ‘Carnival’, ‘Cumberland’ black raspberry, ‘Devon’, ‘Lloyd George’, ‘Malling Exploit’, ‘Malling Jewel’, ‘Malling Landmark’, ‘Newburgh’, ‘Norfolk Giant’, and ‘Pyne’s Royal’. The cross was made in 1980; it was tested as SCRI 8044C9. It is a midseason cultivar with moderate yield and is spineless. Fruit are slightly pale, firm, fleshy, slightly weak skin, prone to wind rub, have a moderate flavor, and are not adapted to machine harvest. Canes are vigorous and relatively upright. It contains A1 aphid resistance and is susceptible to RBDV. This cultivar was released from SCRI with Ronnie McNicol.

12

KIM E. HUMMER, ET AL.

‘Joan Squire’ 1995. SCRI 8216B6  EMR primocane selection. Fruit ripens 2 weeks later than ‘Autumn Bliss’, 2 weeks before ‘Heritage’. This cultivar has good shelf life, excellent flavor, attractive red color with some gloss, no tendency to get a purple-blue tinge. It yields firm, cohesive fruit with skin strength nearly as good as ‘Heritage’. It is more productive than ‘Autumn Bliss’ or ‘Heritage’. It has numerous spineless canes and a spreading growth habit that needs support as the fruit ripens. ‘Terri-Louise’ 1996. ‘Glen Moy’  ‘Autumn Bliss’. Primocane fruit begins to ripen in August in southern England and will crop until mid-December under plastic tunnels. A very early spring crop is produced on overwintered canes. Fruit are very large; they have an attractive red color that darkens when overripe. The flesh texture is very firm, skin strength is weak, and flavor is excellent. It is susceptible to RBDV. ‘Joan J’ 1999. ‘Terri-Louise’  ‘Joan Squire’. This cultivar produces high yields of large fruit, mean 5 g, ripening in early August. Fruit has fleshy texture and is quite dark, with good flavor. The cultivar has spine-free canes and an erect vigorous growth habit. The combination of weak fruit skin and tendency to darken requires picking daily rather than on alternate days. It is mainly of interest to home garden and selfpick growers. ‘Joan Irene’ 2004. ‘Joan J’  (selection of complex origin which also has ‘Dinkum’ in its background). ‘Joan Irene’ produces medium-late primocane fruit that ripen in southern England in August through to November. Fruit is a bright, midred that darkens if not picked regularly. Fruit skin strength is good, as is the shelf life, and large fruit size is maintained late into the fruiting season. Plants are very vigorous with spine-free stout canes. ‘Marcela’ 2004. ‘Autumn Bliss’  ‘Joan Squire’. This is a primocanefruiting cultivar with an early harvest season, up to 2 weeks earlier than ‘Autumn Bliss’ in some environments. Fruit are very firm, lighter red than ‘Autumn Bliss’, and have a strong gloss. Medium force is required for fruit removal, and shelf life and transportation ability are excellent. Growth is strong and is nearly upright. 2. Blackberry ‘Loch Ness’ 1988. This cultivar has a complex parentage, from tetraploid North American cultivars and SCRI breeding lines. It crops over a long period, ripening around 50% of its yield in August under

1. DEDICATION

13

U.K. conditions. It has vigorous growth with spine-free semi-erect shoots. The fruiting laterals usually are about 30 cm long, strong but flexible and with white flowers. The cultivar produces high yields of large, glossy black blunt-conical fruit that are firm and with pleasantly sharp flavor. It has excellent storage capability. ‘Adrienne’ 1995. ‘Silvan’  unnamed selection. This cultivar is selected for spine-free habit and high yield potential. Cropping season is earlier than ‘Loch Ness’ and other European blackberries, from early July onward, with firm, long fruits of around 6 g. Growth is vigorous, with a trailing habit. ‘Helen’ 1996. ‘Silvan’  unnamed selection. This cultivar is early ripening, often the first of the U.K. season. Canes are spine-free, with moderate vigor and trailing habit. Fruits are similar in size to ‘Adrienne’, but skin strength is not as good. 3. Hybrid Berry ‘Tayberry’ 1979. This cultivar is from the tetraploid SCRI raspberry breeding line 626/67  ‘Aurora’ blackberry. It has vigorous shoots produced in moderate to high numbers, spreading in young plants but becoming semi-erect later. It has long laterals, up to 30 cm, bearing very large conical purple berries with high drupelet number. Fruit is firm, slightly glossy, and highly flavored with aromatic quality. Plug remains with fruit when it is picked. It is early ripening, comparable to a midseason red raspberry. ‘Buckingham Tayberry’ 1997. This cultivar is a chimeral spineless sport of ‘Tayberry’, where the cell initial for the L1 layer of the growing apex mutated to produce spinelessness. Vegetative propagation produces more spineless plants, but the spinelessness cannot be used for breeding purposes as it is not in the cells that give rise to flowers or fruit. ‘Tummelberry’ 1983. This cultivar is from ‘Tayberry’  SCRI 69102/18; the latter is a selection from the same family as ‘Tayberry’. It has vigorous shoots produced in moderate to high numbers, spreading to slightly more erect than ‘Tayberry’. It has long laterals, medium-large fruit, and red-purple color. The flavor is slightly acid without aromatic characteristics of ‘Tayberry’. Its ripening season is later than ‘Tayberry’, with slightly greater hardiness. It is susceptible to raspberry leaf and bud mite (Phyllocoptes gracilis).

14

KIM E. HUMMER, ET AL.

4. Purple Raspberry ‘Glencoe’ 1989. This cultivar is SCRI 7751C4 (spineless inbred derivative of ‘Munger’ black raspberry and spineless red raspberries from SCRI)  ‘Glen Prosen’). It is a midseason, spine- less purple raspberry, with midsize round-conic fruit. It is dull, purple, very firm, with intense flavor, and is easy to pick with good shelf life. It is selected for specialized processing, fresh market, and home garden uses. Its canes are semi-erect, deep purple, and coated with a conspicuous waxy bloom. Yield is moderate to high. The fruiting laterals are medium length and stiff. It is resistant to Verticillium wilt and not adapted to cold spring weather. 5. Strawberry ‘Claire Maree’. This cultivar is from Cross made in 1995 between unnamed selections, one from Italian and one from U.K. germplasm. The cultivar is notable for its large size, bright color, and excellent flavor but has insufficient shelf life for supermarket sales and was therefore marketed for amateurs. It is now unavailable. ‘Christine’. This cultivar is from a cross made in 1994 between parents of complex origin involving U.K. and Italian germplasm. It crops 7 to 10 days earlier than ‘Elsanta’, the standard U.K. cultivar, and is widely grown for early production. It is vigorous with a tall leaf canopy, and the fruit is well displayed around the plant. It has high skin strength, which gives it a longer shelf-life than ‘Elsanta’. The color is a bright orange and the flavor is good. ‘Christine’ is highly resistant to powdery mildew and Verticillium wilt but susceptible to Phytophthora root rot. Like most early cultivars, its yield is slightly less than that of ‘Elsanta’. ‘Nicola’. This cultivar is from a cross made in 1996 between ‘Symphony’ and a parent selected from Italian germplasm. It is a midseason cultivar, cropping 4 days before ‘Elsanta’. It is notable for its long shelf life and is superior to ‘Elsanta’ for size and good light, bright color. Yields are also above ‘Elsanta’. One of its main values is its high resistance to Phytophthora root rot. It is prone to powdery mildew when grown under plastic but not in the open field. ‘Chelsea Pensioner’. This cultivar is from a cross made in 1998 between unnamed selections, one from U.K. and one from Italian germplasm. It ripens 6 days after ‘Elsanta’, giving a peak of production late in the season, similar in time to ‘Florence’, the standard late variety in the United

1. DEDICATION

15

Kingdom. The fruits are notable for their very high flavor, deep red color, and slightly prominent achenes. These qualities are not suitable for supermarket sales, so the variety is being marketed for amateurs. Yields have been good, and no serious disease problems have been reported. F. Current Activities Medway Fruits ceased to operate in 2002, after Simon Brice’s retirement, with a final release of the autumn-fruiting raspberry ‘Brice’ in 2007. However, unknot surprisingly, Derek continued to be in high demand as a breeder, and currently he is working for Redeva Ltd., a subsidiary of the Summer Fruits Company. G. Awards and Honors During his career, Derek has been the recipient of several highly prestigious awards, both in the United Kingdom and abroad. In 1979 he was awarded the Scottish Horticultural Medal by the Royal Caledonian Horticultural Society, in appreciation of outstanding services to Scottish horticulture. Internationally, in 1997 Derek was awarded the Wilder Medal by the American Pomological Society for ‘‘excellence in Rubus breeding,’’ and in 2000 he received the ‘‘Horticologo de Honra: Associacao Portugesa de Horticultura,’’ in Portugal, in recognition of his work as consultant to the Department of Horticulture in that country. In 2001 Derek received the award for Lifetime Achievement at the U.K. Grower of the Year Awards. Derek is a widely published scientist, with almost 100 papers and numerous book chapters. In 1988 Academic Press published his book, Raspberries and Blackberries: Their Breeding, Diseases and Growth, and this volume has become a standard text across a very wide readership, from researchers to home gardeners—a true testament to Derek’s ability to communicate his subject and expertise. Derek has passed his boundless enthusiasm for his work and wide knowledge on to numerous young emerging fruit breeders, several of whom spent happy and productive sabbatical periods at SCRI. He remains one of the most respected figures in fruit breeding and is still active—his latest selection, as yet unnamed, was awarded joint first prize at the 2007 National Fruit Show. Looking back over the 50 years of Derek’s career in fruit breeding and research, his work provides a benchmark for the successful application of scientific advances into the reality of commercial cultivars, many of which will be grown for some time to come.

16

KIM E. HUMMER, ET AL.

II. SELECTED PUBLICATIONS OF DEREK JENNINGS A. Journal Articles Anthony, V. M., B. Williamson, D. L. Jennings, and R. C. Shattock. 1986. Inheritance of resistance to yellow rust (Phragmidium rubi-idaei) in red raspberry. Ann. Appl. Biol. 109:365–374. Daubeny, H. A., P. B. Topham, and D. L. Jennings. 1968. A comparison of methods for analyzing inheritance data for resistance to red raspberry powdery mildew. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 10:341–350. Gooding, H. J., D. L. Jennings, and P. B. Topham. 1975. A genotype-environment experiment on strawberries in Scotland. Heredity 34:105–115. Hall, H. K., D. L. Jennings, P. Rosati, and D. Gaggioli. 1988. Inheritance of thornlessness from tissue culture originated loganberries. Acta Hort. 224:369. Hershey, C. H., and D. L. Jennings. 1992. Progress in breeding cassava for adaptation to stress. Pl. Breeding Abstr. 62: 823–831. Jennings, D. L. 1957. Further studies in breeding cassava for virus resistance. East African Agr. J. 22:213–219. Jennings, D. L. 1959. Manihot melanobasis Mull. Arg.—a useful parent for cassava breeding. Euphytica 8:157–162. Jennings, D. L. 1960a. Observations on virus diseases of cassava in resistant and susceptible varieties. I. Mosaic disease. Empire J. of Exp. Agric. 28:23–34. Jennings, D. L. 1960b. Observations on virus diseases of cassava in resistant and susceptible varieties. II. Brown streak disease. Empire J. of Exp. Agric. 28:261– 270. Jennings, D. L. 1961. Mutation for larger fruit in the raspberry. Nature 191:302–303. Jennings, D. L. 1962a. Some aspects of breeding for disease resistance in the raspberry. Proceedings of the 16th International Hort. Congress, Brussels, Belgium, III:87–91. Jennings, D. L. 1962b. Some evidence on the influence of the morphology of raspberry canes upon their liability to be attacked by certain fungi. Hort. Res. 1:100–111. Jennings, D. L. 1963a. Preliminary studies on breeding raspberries for resistance to mosaic disease. Hort. Res. 2:82–96. Jennings, D. L. 1963b. Some evidence on the genetic structure of present-day raspberry varieties and some possible implications for further breeding. Euphytica 12:229– 243. Jennings, D. L. 1963c. Variation in pollen and ovule fertility in varieties of cassava, and the effect of interspecific crossing on fertility. Euphytica 12:69–76. Jennings, D. L. 1964a. Plant breeding and genetic studies in the red raspberry Rubus idaeus L. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. St. Andrews, Scotland. Jennings, D. L. 1964b. Some evidence of population differentiation in Rubus idaeus L. New. Phytol. 63:153–157. Jennings, D. L. 1964c. Studies on the inheritance in the red raspberry of immunities from three nematode-borne viruses. Genetica 34:152–164. Jennings, D. L. 1964d. Two further experiments on flower bud initiation and cane dormancy in the red raspberry (var. Malling Jewel). Hort. Res. 4:14–21. Jennings, D. L. 1966a. The manifold effects of genes affecting fruit size and vegetative growth in the raspberry, I: Gene l1 . New. Phytol. 65:176–187. Jennings, D. L. 1966b. The manifold effects of genes affecting fruit size and vegetative growth in the raspberry, II: Gene l2 New. Phytol. 65:188–191.

1. DEDICATION

17

Jennings, D. L. 1967a. Balanced lethals and polymorphism in Rubus idaeus. Heredity 22:465–479. Jennings, D. L. 1967b. Observations on some instances of partial sterility in red raspberry cultivars. Hort. Res. 7:116–122. Jennings, D. L. 1970a. Cassava in Africa. Field Crop Abstracts 23:271–278. Jennings, D. L. 1970b. Cassava in East Africa. Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. on Tropical Root and Tuber Crops: 64–65. Jennings, D. L. 1971a. Some genetic factors affecting the development of endocarp, endosperm and embryo in raspberries. New Phytol. 70:885–895. Jennings, D. L. 1971b. Some genetic factors affecting fruit development in red raspberries. New Phytol. 70:361–370. Jennings, D. L. 1971c. Some genetic factors affecting seedling emergence in raspberries. New Phytol. 70:1103–1110. Jennings, D. L. 1972. Aberrant segregation of a gene in the raspberry and its association with effects on seed development. Heredity 29:83–90. Jennings, D. L. 1974a. Aspects of fruit and seed development which affect the breeding behaviour of Rubus species. Genetica 45:1–10. Jennings, D. L. 1974b. Breeding raspberries for machine harvesting. Scottish Hort. Research Inst. Ann. Bull. 8:34–37. Jennings, D. L. 1975a. Aspects of fruit and seed development which affect the breeding behaviour of Rubus species. Genetica 45:315–324. Jennings, D. L. 1975b. An evaluation of some sources of resistance to two virus diseases of cassava. J. Root Crops 1:19–23. Jennings, D. L. 1977. Somatic mutation in the raspberry. Hort. Res. 17:61–63. Jennings, D. L. 1978. The blackberries of South America—an unexplored reservoir of germplasm. Fruit Var. J. 32:61–63. Jennings, D. L. 1979a. Genotype-environment relationships for ripening time in blackberries and prospects for breeding an early ripening cultivar for Scotland. Euphytica 28:747–750. Jennings, D. L. 1979b. The occurrence of multiple fruiting laterals at single nodes of raspberry canes. New Phytol. 82:365–374. Jennings, D. L. 1979c. Resistance to Leptosphaeria coniothyrium in the red raspberry and some related species. Ann. Appl. Biol. 93:319–326. Jennings, D. L. 1980. Recent progress in breeding raspberries and other Rubus fruits at the Scottish Horticultural Research Institute. Acta Hort. 112:109–116. Jennings, D. L. 1981. A hundred years of Loganberries. Fruit Var. J. 35:34–37. Jennings, D. L. 1982a. Further evidence on the effects of gene H, which confers cane hairyness, on resistance to raspberry diseases. Euphytica 31:953–956. Jennings, D. L. 1982b. Resistance to Didymella applanata in red raspberry and some related species. Ann. Appl. Biol. 101:331–337. Jennings, D. L. 1983. Inheritance of resistance to Botrytis cinerea and Didymella applanata in canes of Rubus idaeus, and relationships between these resistances. Euphytica 32:895–901. Jennings, D. L. 1984. A dominant gene for spinelessness in Rubus, and its use in breeding. Crop Res. 24:45–50. Jennings, D. L. 1986a. Breeding soft fruit for processing. Acta Hort. 194:21–29. Jennings, D. L. 1986b. Breeding for spinelessness in blackberries and blackberry-raspberry hybrids: A review. Acta Hort. 183:59–66. Jennings, D. L. 1987a. Host-virus relationships of resistant cassava and African cassava mosaic virus, and some implications for breeding and disease control. Proc. Int. Conf. on

18

KIM E. HUMMER, ET AL.

African Cassava Mosaic Disease and Its Control, Yamoussoukro, Cote d’Ivoire, May 1987: 170–174. Jennings, D. L. 1987b. Some effects of secondary dormancy and correlative inhibition on the development of lateral buds of raspberry canes (Rubus idaeus L.). Crop. Res. (Hort. Res.) 27:119–129. Jennings, D. L. 1988. Scottish blackberry with US background. Grower (March): 38–39. Jennings, D. L. 1989a. Blackberry plant-Loch Ness cultivar. United States Plant Patent PP 6,782. Washington D.C. Jennings, D. L. 1989b. The use of multivariate analyses for study of autumn-fruiting strawberries. Acta Hort. 265:91–96. Jennings, D. L. 1991a. Rubus Breeding—recent progress and problems. Plant Breeding Abstracts 61:753–758. Jennings, D. L. 1991b. Techniques for extending the cropping season of strawberries, raspberries and blackberries and the implication of these techniques and new cultivars for raspberry and blackberry production in Australia. Proc. National Conf. of the Australian Berry Growers Association, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Jennings, D. L. 1993. Mutations in Rubus: Their value in breeding and problems for propagation. Acta Hort. 352:353–360. Jennings, D. L. 1994. Breeding for resistance to African cassava mosaic geminivirus in East Africa. Trop. Sci. 34:110–122. Jennings, D. L. 1995. ‘Glen Moy’ Red Raspberry. Fruit Var. J. 49:2–4. Jennings, D. L. 1997. ‘Joan’ doubles the options. Grower (July 17):32. Jennings, D. L. 2002. Breeding primocane-fruiting raspberries at Medway Fruits—progress and prospects. Acta Hort. 585:85–89. Jennings, D. L. 2003. Blackberries and related fruits. Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition. pp.546–550. Jennings, D. L., and E. Brydon. 1989a. Further studies on breeding for resistance to Botrytis cinerea in red raspberry canes. Ann. Appl. Biol. 115:507–513. Jennings, D. L., and E. Brydon. 1989b. Further studies on resistance to Leptosphaeria coniothyrium in the red raspberry and related species. Ann. Appl. Biol. 115:499– 506. Jennings, D. L., and E. Brydon. 1990. Variable inheritance of spinelessness in progenies of a mutant of the red raspberry cv. Willamette. Euphytica 46:71–77. Jennings, D. L., and E. Carmichael. 1975a. A dominant gene for yellow fruit in the raspberry. Euphytica 24:467–470. Jennings, D. L., and E. Carmichael. 1975b. Resistance to grey mould (Botrytis cinerea Fr.) in red raspberry fruits. Hort. Res. 14:109–115. Jennings, D. L., and E. Carmichael. 1975c. Some physiological changes occurring in overwintering raspberry plants in Scotland. Hort. Res. 14:103–108. Jennings, D. L., and E. Carmichael. 1979. Colour changes in frozen blackberries. Hort. Res. 19:15–24. Jennings, D. L., and E. Carmichael. 1980. Anthocyanin variation in the genus Rubus. New Phytol. 84:505–513. Jennings, D. L., and M. R. Cormack. 1969. Factors affecting the water content and dormancy of overwintering raspberry canes. Hort. Res. 9:18–25. Jennings, D. L., and A. Dale. 1982. Variation in the growth habit of red raspberries with particular reference to cane height and node production. J. Hort. Sci. 57:197–204. Jennings, D. L., and L. Evans, 1990. Maintaining plant health through certification schemes and hygienic methods of propagation. Proc. Nat. Conf. of the Austr. Berry Growers Assoc.

1. DEDICATION

19

Jennings, D. L., and R. Ingram. 1983. Hybrids of Rubus parviflorus (Nutt.) with raspberry and blackberry, and the inheritance of spinelessness derived from this species. Crop Res. 23:95–101. Jennings, D. L., and A. T. Jones. 1986. Immunity from raspberry vein chlorosis virus in raspberry and its potential for control of the virus through plant breeding. Ann. Appl. Biol. 108:417–422. Jennings, D. L., and A. T. Jones. 1989. Further studies on the occurrence and inheritance of resistance in red raspberry to a resistance-breaking strain of raspberry bushy dwarf virus. Ann. Appl. Biol. 114:317–323. Jennings, D. L., and G. R. McGregor. 1988a. Resistance to cane spot (Elsinoe veneta) in the red raspberry and its relationship to yellow rust (Phragmidium rubi-idaei). Euphytica 37:173–180. Jennings, D. L., and R. J. McNicol. 1989a. Black raspberries and purple raspberries should be spine-free and tetraploid. Acta Hort. 262:89–92. Jennings, D. L., and R. J. McNicol. 1989b. Segregation of plants with abnormal flowers in a blackberry breeding programme. Crop Res. 29:51–54. Jennings, D. L., and R. J. McNicol. 1991. Rubus breeding—recent progress and problems. Pl. Breeding Abstr. 61: 753–758. Jennings, D. L., and P. B. Topham. 1971. Some consequences of raspberry pollen dilution for its germination and for fruit development. New. Phytol. 70:371–380. Jennings, D. L., and B. M. Tulloch. 1965. Studies on factors which promote germination of raspberry seeds. J. Expt. Bot. 16:329–340. Jennings, D. L., and B. Williamson. 1982. Resistance to Botrytis cinerea in canes of Rubus idaeus and some related species. Ann. Appl. Biol. 100:375–381. Jennings, D. L., M. M. Anderson, and C. A. Wood. 1964a. Observations on a severe occurrence of raspberry cane death in Scotland. Hort. Res. 4:65–77. Jennings, D. L., M. M. Anderson, and C. A. Wood. 1964b. Two further experiments on flower-bud initiation and cane dormancy in the red raspberry (var. ‘Malling Jewel’). Hort. Res. 4:14–21. Jennings, D. L., E. Carmichael, and J. J. Costin. 1972. Variation in the time of acclimation of raspberry canes in Scotland and Ireland and its significance for hardiness. Hort. Res. 12:187–200. Jennings, D. L., D. L. Craig, and P. B. Topham. 1967. The role of the male parent in the reproduction of Rubus. J. Hered. 22:43–55. Jennings, D. L., A. Dale, and E. Carmichael. 1976. Raspberry and blackberry breeding at the Scottish Horticultural Research Institute. Acta Hort. 60:129–134. Jennings, D. L., H. A. Daubeny, and J. N. Moore. 1991. Blackberries and raspberries (Rubus). In Genetic resources of temperate fruit and nut crops. Acta Hort. 290:331–389. Jennings, D. L., G. R. McGregor, J. A. Wong, and C. E. Young. 1986. Bud suppression (‘‘blind bud’’) in raspberries. Acta Hort. 183:285–289. Jones, A. T., and D. L. Jennings. 1980. Genetic control of the reactions of raspberry to black raspberry necrosis, raspberry leaf mottle and raspberry leaf spot viruses. Ann. Appl. Biol. 96:59–65. Jones, A. T., S. C. Gordon, and D. L. Jennings. 1984. A leaf-blotch disorder of Tayberry associated with the leaf and bud mite (Phyllocoptes gracilis) and some effects of three aphid-borne viruses. J. Hort. Sci. 59:523–528. Jones, A. T., M. J. Mitchell, D. L. Jennings, and S. C. Gordon. 1988. Recent research on viruses and virus-like diseases on Rubus in Scotland. Acta Hort. 186:9–16. Jones, A. T., A. F. Murant, D. L. Jennings, and G. A. Wood. 1982. Association of raspberry bushy dwarf virus with raspberry yellows disease; reaction of Rubus species and cultivars, and the inheritance of resistance. Ann. Appl. Biol. 100:135–147.

20

KIM E. HUMMER, ET AL.

Knight, V. H., D. L. Jennings, and R. J. McNicol. 1989. Progress in the UK raspberry breeding programme. Acta Hort. 262:93–103. McNicol, R. J., B. Williamson, D. L. Jennings, and J. A. T. Woodford. 1983. Resistance to raspberry cane midge (Resseliella theobaldi) and its association with wound periderm in Rubus crataegifolius and its red raspberry derivatives. Ann. Appl. Biol. 103:489–495. Murant, A. F., D. L. Jennings, and J. Chambers. 1973. The problem of crumbly fruit in raspberry nuclear stocks. Hort. Res. 13:49–54. Murant, A. F., A. T. Jones, and D. L. Jennings. 1982. Problems in the control of raspberry bushy dwarf virus. Acta Hort. 129:77–83. Oliveira, P. B., L. L. da Fonseca, and D. L. Jennings. 2004. Summer pruning effect on reproductive yield components of ‘Triple Crown’ blackberry. Acta Hort. 649:277–281. Pool, P. A., R. Ingram, R. J. Abbott, D. L. Jennings, and P. B. Topham. 1981. Karyotype variation in Rubus with particular reference to R. idaeus L. and R. coreanus Miquel. Cytologia 46:125–132. Rosati, P., H. K. Hall, D. L. Jennings, and D. Gaggioli. 1988. A dominant gene for thornlessness obtained from the chimeral thornless Loganberry. HortScience 23:899–902. Thresh, J. M., G. W. Otim-Nape, and D. L. Jennings. 1994. Exploiting resistance to African cassava mosaic resistance. Asp. Appl. Biol. 39:51–60. Williamson, B., and D. L. Jennings. 1986. Common resistance in red raspberry to Botrytis cinerea and Didymella applanata, two pathogens occupying the same ecological niche. Ann. Appl. Biol. 109:581–593. Williamson, B., and D. L. Jennings. 1992. Resistance to cane and foliar diseases in red raspberry (Rubus idaeus) and related species. Euphytica 63:59–70.

B. Book Chapters and Books Jennings, D. L. 1976a. Cassava. pp. 81–90. In: J. Smartt and N. W. Simmonds (eds.), Evolution of crop plants. Longman Group, Essex, UK. Jennings, D. L. 1976b. Raspberries and blackberries Rubus (Rosaceae). pp. 251–254. In: J. Smartt, and N. W. Simmonds (eds.), Evolution of crop plants. Longman Group, Essex, UK. Jennings, D. L. 1978. The inheritance of linked resistances to African cassava mosaic and bacterial blight diseases. ID RC Monograph Series CE-14, Ottawa, Canada. Jennings, D. L. 1987. Crop utilization: Starch crops. In: B. R. Christie (ed.), Handbook of plant science in agriculture. CRC Press Inc. Boca Raton, FL. Jennings, D. L. 1988. Raspberries and blackberries: Their breeding, diseases and growth. Academic Press, London. Jennings, D. L. 1995. Cassava. pp. 128–132. In: J. Smartt and N. W. Simmonds (eds.), Evolution of crop plants, 2nd ed. Longman, London. Jennings, D. L. 1995. Raspberries and blackberries. pp. 429–434. In: J. Smartt and N. W. Simmonds (eds.), Evolution of crop plants, 2nd ed. Longman, London. Jennings, D. L. 2003a. Berries under cover: The southern European experience. In: A. Royal (ed.), Proc. 12th National and 1st Trans-Tasman Berryfruit Conf. Jennings, D. L. 2003b. Raspberry production indoors: managing the variables. In: A. Royal (ed.), Proc.12th National and 1st Trans-Tasman Berryfruit Conf. Jennings, D. L., and M. M. Anderson, 1984. Soft fruit breeding in Scotland. Fruit, Vegetable and Science, pp. 24–25. Jennings, D. L., M. M. Anderson, and R. M. Brennan. 1988. Raspberry and blackcurrant breeding. pp. 135–147. In: A. J. Abbott and R. J. Atkin (eds.), Improving vegetatively propagated crops. Academic Press, London.

1. DEDICATION

21

Jennings, D. L., H. J. Gooding, and M. M. Anderson. 1973. Recent developments in soft fruit breeding. In: Fruit present and future 2. Royal Hort. Soc., London. Jennings, D. L., and C. H. Hershey. 1985. Cassava breeding: A decade of progress from international programmes. pp. 89–113. In: G. E. Russell (ed.), Progress in plant breeding. Butterworths, London. Jennings, D. L., and C. Iglesias. 2002. Breeding for crop improvement. pp. 149–166. In: R. J. Hillocks, M. J. Thresh, and A. Bellotti (eds.), Cassava: Biology, production and utilization. CAB Int., Wallingford, UK. Jennings, D. L., and G. R. McGregor. 1988. Some genetic facts which control the number and size of raspberry fruits produced on a raspberry cane. pp. 315–327. In: C. J. Wright (ed.), Manipulation of fruiting, Univ. Nottingham 47th Easter School in Agricultural Science. Butterworths, Sevenoaks, UK. Terry, E. R., and D. L. Jennings. 1976. Symptomatology of cassava mosaic disease and a proposal for further study to categorize the variants. pp. 36–38. In: Procedings of the African cassava mosaic Interdisciplinary Workshop. Muguga (Kenya). IDRC Monograph (ID RC -071c).

C. Cultivar Release Notices and Plant Patents Jennings, D. L. 1978. Plant breeding. New cultivar of hybrid berry—Tayberry. Rep. Scottish Hort. Res. Inst. for 1977: 62–63. Jennings, D. L. 1982a. New raspberry cultivar: Glen Moy. Annu. Report of the Scot. Crop. Res. Inst. for 1981: 71–72. Jennings, D. L. 1982b. New raspberry cultivar: Glen Prosen. Annu. Rep. Scottish Crop. Res. Inst. for 1981: 72–73. Jennings, D. L. 1983a. New cultivar of hybrid Rubus: Tummelberry. Ann. Rep. Scottish Crop. Res. Inst. for 1982: 86–87. Jennings, D. L. 1983b. Two new spine-free raspberries. Fruit Var. J. 37:34–36. Jennings, D. L. 2005. Joan J breeders description. URL: http://www.meiosis.co.uk/fruit/ joan_j.htm. (Accessed: April 14, 2007.) Jennings, D. L. 2006. Notes on a conference entitled Breeding Strawberries and Raspberries for the 21st Century held by Meiosis, July 18, 2006. Jennings, D. L. 2007. Raspberry variety named ‘Marcela’, United States Plant Patent, Washington, D.C. Maidstone, G. B., and Jennings, D. L. 2007. Raspberry variety named ‘Joan Irene’, United States Plant Patent, Washington, D.C. McNicol, R. J., and D. L. Jennings, 2000. Raspberry variety named ‘Glen Ample’, United States Plant Patent, Washington, D.C.

III. HUGH A. DAUBENY A. Early Years Dr. Hugh A. Daubeny was born on December 6, 1931, in Nanaimo, British Columbia (BC) and attended primary school there and in Victoria, where he completed primary school and graduated from Mt. View High School. Both his parents came from the United Kingdom. His father, Hugh C. C. Daubeny, came from England, where he served in the Royal Navy as a

22

KIM E. HUMMER, ET AL.

midshipman during the latter days of the World War I. Between the wars he served in the BC Provincial Police and later in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. At the beginning of the World War II, in 1939, he was called up to serve in the Royal Canadian Navy (RCN) and was commander of the corvette Nanaimo, part of the fleet of corvettes that escorted convoys in the North Atlantic. After the war he returned to Victoria to serve with the RCMP until his retirement. He died in 1969. Hugh’s mother, Mary, came from Aberdeen in Scotland to visit relatives who had an orchard at Summerland in the Okanagan Valley of BC. There she met and married his father. They lived in the BC interior briefly and then moved to Nanaimo, where they stayed until the early years of the war. The main Pacific base of the RCN was located at Esquimalt, near Victoria and was the home base of the HMCS Nanaimo. Hugh had one younger sister, who died in an air crash in northern British Columbia in the 1960s, while on her way to a teachers’ convention. She taught school at Stewart, BC. at the head of the Portland Canal, on the Alaska border. Hugh’s mother lived in the family home until 1988, when she decided to move to Vancouver to be closer to him and his family. She lived with them for 5 years, until ill health forced her into an extended care in a hospital nearby. She died in 2002, a few days short of her 98th birthday. Both his parents were keen gardeners, similar to so many who came to British Columbia from the United Kingdom between the two world wars. In 1946, after the war, his parents had their first real garden and grew traditional British vegetables: marrow, broad beans, turnips, parsnips, and leeks. His mother never got used to tomatoes, a crop that was almost unheard of during her youth in Scotland. It was ironic that Hugh researched tomatoes as part of his Ph.D. degree program at Cornell University. His mothers loved flowers, especially roses and sweet peas. The family garden had an old patch of raspberries as well as loganberries and, for a few years, ‘Youngberries’, which died out after an unusually cold winter. There was a ‘Bing’ cherry and also a pear and plum tree. For several summers in the mid-1940s, Hugh picked black currants, then ‘Loganberries’ and raspberries at a berry farm in Gordon Head. Gordon Head was renowned for producing quality berries; now it is an upscale residential area. Hugh also picked strawberries, the legendary ‘British Sovereign’ cultivar, for 1 week but was glad when the black currants and cane berries started to ripen. He did not enjoy stooping, but overcame this once he became a strawberry breeder. The family home was near a lovely Garry oak park (Quercus garryana)—relic species distributed from the California and Oregon

1. DEDICATION

23

and Washington coasts into southwestern British Columbia). The oaks had a marvelous undergrowth of native plants, such as Erthyronium, Camus, Trillium, and Dodecatheum. Here Hugh had his first experiences with native plants. This was the foundation of Hugh’s obsession with plant conservation in his later years. Unfortunately, only about 10% of the original Canadian Garry oak ecosystem remains: on Vancouver Island, on the Gulf Islands, and in a few sites in the lower mainland of British Columbia. As an undergraduate at the University of British Columbia in the 1950s, Hugh spent one summer working on the vegetable cultivar trials that Agriculture Canada sponsored on the campus. Other summers were spent as a student assistant at Agriculture Canada’s Saanich Experimental Station near his home. He worked with a research scientist who was screening herbicides. Hugh learned about preparing and applying the chemicals and experimental design. After that, though, he decided he was better suited for plant breeding. In 1953 he received his BSA from UBC. His major professor at UBC, Cedric Hornby, had gone to Cornell University, and he persuaded Hugh to accept an assistantship there. Hugh performed his doctoral research on the mechanisms of fruit set of tomatoes under-less-than optimum temperatures and his assistantship research on bacterial blight on dry beans. His major professor was Dr. Henry Munger, the world’s premier vegetable breeder. Hugh obtained his Ph.D. from Cornell in 1958. While at Cornell, he met his future wife, Marian Peterson, a technician in animal science. Marian had a B.S. degree in bacteriology from the University of Utah. They were married in 1959. B. Early Career Hugh was offered positions in the East but decided to accept an offer from Agriculture Canada to establish breeding programs for strawberries and raspberries in coastal British Columbia. The move was facilitated by Charlie J. Bishop, Agriculture Canada’s Program Coordinator for Horticulture Crops. The establishment of field plots at the Pacific Agri-Food Research Center at Agassiz had some unique challenges; the region was reputed to have the highest population of black bears in the world, and they were a dangerous nuisance in his plots. A second problem was people related. As the plots were being planted, the adjacent bush land was being cleared by prisoners from a nearby correctional facility. This was an interesting situation, especially during the summer months, when the assistants, mostly

24

KIM E. HUMMER, ET AL.

female students from UBC, were working. By the late 1960s, Hugh Daubeny was well recognized as an up-and-coming-raspberry and strawberry breeder by scientific community. Hugh and Marian lived in Agassiz until 1973, when the breeding program was moved to the Vancouver Research Station near where Hugh’s collaborators, the plant pathologists and virologists, were stationed. The field plots were relocated near Abbotsford. One plus of the move: There were no bears. Another was that the plots were located in the heart of the berry-growing country. This was in the days before urban encroachment. Unfortunately, recently berry area has diminished there despite an Agriculture Land Reserve designation. C. Scientific Collaborations Hugh’s breeding program flourished in Vancouver under the encouragement of the director, Marvin Weintraub. Research progress was assisted with inputs from the outstanding plant pathologists Bert Pepin and later Andre Levesque; the virologists Dick Stace-Smith, Frances Mellor, and later Bob Martin; and a nematologist Thierry Vrain. Protocols were established for selecting resistance or tolerance to diseases. These included strawberry red stele root rot, fruit rots, and powdery mildew of both crops, raspberry root rot, raspberry spur blight and cane Botrytis and resistance to the North American aphid vector of the raspberry mosaic virus complex. Cooperative research helped to better understanding of raspberry bushy dwarf virus and meadow lesion nematode. The efforts of Dick Stace-Smith and Frances Mellor always assured virus-free planting stock for raspberry and strawberry genotypes, respectively. Inheritance patterns were established for reactions to aphids, powdery mildew, spur blight, and cane Botrytis in raspberry and virus tolerance in strawberry. Hugh also did lot of cooperative work with Jack Freeman from Agassiz on developing cultural and management procedures that enhanced the adaptation of newly developed cultivars. The years at the Vancouver Research Station cemented the outstanding research team of berry crop researchers that flourished in the Pacific Northwest. In 1959 Hugh met two legendary berry crop breeders, Charles ‘‘Chet’’ Schwartz, at Washington State University in Puyallup, and George Waldo, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Oregon State University in Corvallis. Other key breeders later became an integral part of the community: Bruce Barritt followed by Tom Sjulin and then Pat Moore in Washington, and Francis ‘‘Whitey’’ Lawrence and then Chad Finn in Oregon. Throughout the

1. DEDICATION

25

Pacific Northwest there was excellent cooperative work among plant pathologists, entomologists, horticulturists, soil scientists, and agronomists such as Peter Bristow, Bob Norton, Perry Crandall, and Carl Shanks in Washington, and Dick Converse in Oregon, and, in later years, Bernadine Strik in Oregon and Jack Freeman, Matt John, and Bill Peters in British Columbia. Hugh’s helpful technical and field crew included Henry Troelsen, Dana Stary, Angela Anderson, and Susan Wahlgren. Hugh’s success as a berry crop breeder was based on combining collaborative friendships and germplasm exchange from many breeding programs as well as from the wild. His well-documented use of the East Malling Research Station (EMRS) and Scottish Crop Research Institutes (SCRI ) germplasm as parents, crossed with his own material, led to the development of a group of cultivars that are commercially important, widely adapted, and have large, high-quality fruit. Hugh has decried the decrease in exchange that has come with widespread patenting of cultivars. His open exchange approach laid the ground to the excellent relationships that exist between the three Pacific Northwest breeding programs today. Hugh’s enthusiasm for cooperation and collaboration has not been limited to North America. He played a significant role in the establishment and development of breeding programs in Australia with Graeme McGregor and in New Zealand, first with Jim Porter and Norm Broadbent of the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (MAF) in Levin, and later with Harvey Hall at the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR) and then HortResearch, New Zealand (HRNZ). Hugh has visited these programs several times and kept in contact with each of the breeders until the time of Graeme McGregor’s death in December 2005. Hugh generously supplied germplasm for each program and was active in encouraging publication from and with these breeders. D. Career Successes The greatest success from the strawberry breeding program was ‘Totem,’ the leading cultivar in the Pacific Northwest for more than 30 years. This is probably a record for longevity of any strawberry grown in the region. Only after 2005 did the cultivar begin to succumb to resistance-breaking races of the red stele root rot causal organism, Phytophthora fragariae var. fragariae and changes in the aphidtransmitted virus complex. ‘Totem’ has been used extensively in other breeding programs. Other strawberry cultivars from Hugh’s program include the winter hardy ‘Sumas’ and ‘Nanaimo,’ named after town where he was born and his father’s ship Nanaimo in World War II.

26

KIM E. HUMMER, ET AL.

‘Nanaimo’ produces fruit with an exceptionally high soluble solids content and appealing fresh flavor. Unfortunately, size is not maintained through the season. Hugh was willing to take chances in his breeding efforts. By using wide crosses and indigenous species, Hugh broadened the germplasm base of the strawberry and raspberry breeding programs. This resulted in added disease and insect resistances and improved fruit qualities. Hugh’s cultivar ‘Tulameen’ resulted from the 1980 cross of ‘Nootka’ ‘Glen Prosen’ made in the breeding program at Agriculture and AgriFood Canada’s Pacific Agriculture Research Centre. ‘Nootka’, an earlier release from the program, is noted for its high levels of soluble solids that are well balanced with acid levels. ‘Glen Prosen’ is an exceptionally firm, large-fruited cultivar from the Scottish Crop Research Institute’s program. It owes its firmness to genes obtained from the eastern North America native black raspberry, Rubus occidentalis. These genes were brought into raspberry breeding through pioneering work at Horticulture Research International, at East Malling in England. ‘Tulameen’ was initially selected in the seedling stage for resistance to the common strain of the aphid vector (Amphorophora agathonica) of the raspberry mosaic virus complex. The selected seedling was placed into the field in 1982. As early as 1984, it was recognized for its outstanding qualities including large, relatively firm fruit with glossy medium-red color. Fruit was well displayed and easily removed from the receptacle. The color was more attractive than that of either parent. The flavor was especially appealing. Harvest began in late June and lasted for approximately 6 weeks, up to 2 weeks longer than that of most other cultivars. Such a long season is an especially desirable trait in fresh-market cultivars. The plant was vigorous but did not produce excessive primocanes. Hugh decided to fast-track the selection. Propagation of pathogen-free nuclear stock for production of certified plants began immediately. By 1987 there were plants in growers’ trials, and it was named in 1989, a year before the Plant Royalty Act came into effect in Canada. Thus, unlike the situation with cultivars named since then, it was easy to distribute plants to production regions throughout the world. During the 1990s, favorable performance information was received from the United Kingdom; various western European countries, such as Spain, France, Belgium and the Netherlands; southeastern Australia, and Chile. ‘Tulameen’ canes have relatively low chilling requirement and can be manipulated quite easily and efficiently to flower and fruit out of season or to being forced in greenhouses.

1. DEDICATION

27

Hugh’s greatest success, ‘Tulameen’, has become the most widely grown fresh-market cultivar throughout the world. It is the world standard by which other fresh-market and potential fresh-market cultivars are judged. ‘Tulameen’ has been used extensively in breeding programs including those in the private sector. Many millions of new plants are added to growers fields each year. Until 10 years ago, in the Pacific Northwest, ‘Tulameen’ had very little impact on the processing market because ‘Meeker’ was the dominant cultivar. In the last few years, however, cultivar plantings have changed. Significant numbers of Hugh’s raspberry cultivars are now planted in the Pacific Northwest too. In 2007, 28% of the plants sold there were from his program. In the last 7 years, 4.4 million plants of these cultivars were sold in the Pacific Northwest, which is 16.4% of the total plant sales. E. Cultivar Releases ‘Matsqui’ 1961. The origin of this cultivar is a cross between ‘Sumner’ ‘Carnival’. It was released because of its firm, bright-red fruit and relative ease of harvest and resistance to Botrytis fruit rot. This cultivar was never a commercial success but was a good breeding parent for fruit quality, color, and appearance in the New Zealand breeding program. The name is derived from the Halkomelen word meaning ‘‘easy portage’’ or ‘‘easy traveling,’’ referring to the ease of ascending creeks from the Fraser and dragging canoes over the height of land to the old Sumas Lake or to the tributaries of the Nooksack River. ‘Haida’ 1973. The origin of this cultivar is a cross between ‘Malling Promise’  ‘Creston’. This release is particularly winter hardy, probably has resistance to the resistance-breaking strain of RBDV, and is adapted to low-chill conditions and for upright cane growth. The cultivar was named for the Haida people, who live along the coastal bays and inlets of the Queen Charlotte Islands. The tribe is renowned for its carved totem poles and great war canoes. ‘Chilcotin’ 1978. The origin of this cultivar is a cross between ‘Sumner’  ‘Newburgh’. Credited with jump-starting the interest in fresh market in the Pacific Northwest in the early 1980s, ‘Chilcotin’’ is now being grown in niche markets in Ontario and New Zealand. It is a key breeding parent for fresh-market cultivars, giving RBDV resistance and light, nondarkening red color. The name refers to the Chilcotin tribe and country in the Cariboo. It specifically refers to the Chicotin River, which flows east into the Fraser. The name can be translated as

28

KIM E. HUMMER, ET AL.

‘‘ocher river people.’’ ‘‘Ocher’’ here refers not to the color but to the mineral (usually red or yellow) much prized by the First Nations people used as a base for paint or dye. ‘Skeena’ 1977. The origin of this cultivar is a cross between ‘Creston’ SCRI 6010/52, a derivative of ‘Burnetholm’ and ‘Malling Jewel’. Until recent HortResearch releases, ‘Skeena’ was a leading cultivar in New Zealand for the process market. The name is based on the Skeena River, which is derived from two Tsimshian First Nation words meaning ‘‘water out of the clouds.’’ ‘Nootka’ 1978. The origin of this cultivar is a cross between ‘Carnival’ ‘Willamette’. This cultivar is widely recognized as a donor of genes for harvest ease, lower susceptibility to both pre- and postharvest fruit rot, and high soluble solids content as well as some field resistance to root rot and meadow lesion nematode and escape and resistace to RBDV. The name refers to Nootka Sound on the west coast of Vancouver Island. The most likely explanation of the word ‘‘nootka’’ is that the first Europeans to go there heard the First Nations people say noo-kaeh, the imperative of the local verb meaning ‘‘go around.’’ ‘Algonquin’ 1984, 1991. The origin of this cultivar is a cross between ‘Haida’  ‘Canby’. This cultivar was originally released as germplasm for breeding in 1984 under the name BC 72–1–7. It showed potential as a breeding parent as it is homozygous for gene Ag1 , conferring dominant resistance to Amphorophora agathonica, the aphid vector of the raspberry mosaic virus complex. In 1991 it was named and released for its adaptation to conditions in Ontario and in Denmark. ‘Algonquin’ has been a good parent in breeding and has also shown good adaptation to low-chill conditions in New Zealand. The name refers to a group of community of First Nations people in western Ontario and adjacent Quebec, centering on the Ottawa River and its tributaries. The name is appropriate because the cultivar performs particularly well in Ontario and is winter hardy. ‘Chilliwack’ 1987. The origin of this cultivar is a cross between (‘Sumner’  ‘Carnival’)  ‘Skeena’. This high-quality fresh-market raspberry has been the leading cultivar the Santiago region of Chile for transhemispheric air freighting to North America and Europe during November and December for the last 15 years. It is important in the raspberry-growing regions of Victoria, Australia, for the fresh market. It has a relatively high level of root rot tolerance in the field. ‘Chilliwack’

1. DEDICATION

29

is very upright and is well adapted to the ‘‘long cane’’ production method for raspberries. The name refers to a local First Nations people and to various geographic features. The Tolkomelen word has the sense of ‘‘quieter waters at the head’’ or ‘‘travel by way of a backwater or slough.’’ The name is particularly appropriate since ‘Chilliwack’ produces firm fruit that travels well. ‘Comox’ 1987. The origin of this cultivar is a cross between BC 64–9–81 (Creston  Willamette)  Skeena. It is a medium-size fruited, highyielding cultivar that has not become a commercial success in its own right. However, it has been a very useful breeding parent for both floricane raspberries (high yield) and primocane fruiting raspberries (lateral structure). The name refers to a Kwakwala First Nation word meaning ‘‘place of plenty’’ with reference to the abundant game and berries in the Comox Valley. The name is appropriate as ‘Comox’ is high yielding. ‘Kitsilano’ 1988. The origin of this cultivar are crosses between ‘Comox’  EM 3909/4; it has a complex origin, with over 4 generations of numbered selections in its origin. This release ripens late in the season and provides an effective overlap with some of the early-ripening primocane cultivars. The medium-size fruit is bright red. This cultivar was superseded at the time of its release by ‘Cascade Delight’ and ‘Coho’, but it has been a great breeding parent, contributing fruit quality and productivity to progenies. The name is derived from the name of Squamish First Nation settler who came from a village on the Squamish River and settled in Stanley Park circa 1860. The cultivar was released with Chaim Kempler. ‘Qualicum’ 1995. The origin of this cultivar is a cross between ‘Glen Moy’  ‘Chilliwack’. This cultivar is grown in British Columbia and transported to eastern North America. The large chunky fruit is extremely firm, well suited for transport; the plant is very vigorous. The name is derived from a Nanaimo First Nations term for ‘‘place of the dog (chum) salmon.’’ ‘Malahat’ 1999. The origin of this cultivar is a cross between ‘Meeker’  BC 7853/116 (SCRI 7269/67  ‘Nootka’). This is the leading early fresh-market cultivar in British Columbia. There is some debate on the origin of this Saanich First Nation name; some say it means ‘‘infested with caterpillars’’ (let us hope not!) and others say it means ‘‘place where one gets bait.’’ This cultivar was released with Chaim Kempler.

30

KIM E. HUMMER, ET AL.

‘Cowichan’ 2005. The origin of this cultivar is a cross between ‘Newburgh’  ‘Qualicum’. This release has shown the most potential in England, where it appears to have resistance to strains of the root rot causal organism. The name is derived from a Halkomelem First Nation word meaning ‘‘warm country’’ or ‘‘warmed by the sun.’’ The name originated because of a large rock formation, on the side of Mount. Tzuhalem, supposedly resembling a frog basking in the sun. This cultivar was released with Chaim Kempler. ‘Esquimalt’ 2005. This cultivar has a complex origin: ‘Comox’  SCRI 7815B8, derived in part from ‘Rumiloba’, ‘Glen Prosen’, ‘Meeker’, ‘Burnetholm’, ‘Malling Jewel’, ‘Malling Exploit’, and others. It is a summer-fruiting, high-yielding plant with large, firm fruit that ripen late and are well suited to fresh market. This cultivar was released with Chaim Kempler. ‘Chemainus’ 2006. The origin of this cultivar is a cross between BC 82– 5–84 (‘Algonquin’  ‘Chilliwack’)]  ‘Tulameen’. It is a recent multipurpose type release being widely planted in the Pacific Northwest. This cultivar was released with Chaim Kempler. ‘Saanich’ 2006. The origin of this cultivar is a cross between BC 82–5– 161 (Algonquin  Chilliwack)  B C 80–28–50 (‘Nootka’  ‘Glen Prosen’. It is a high-yielding newer release suited for machine harvest and a multipurpose type for both fresh and processing markets. This cultivar was released with Chaim Kempler. ‘Nanoose’ 2007. This cultivar has a complex parentage involving ‘Skeena’, ‘Dalhousie Lake 4’, ‘Meeker’, ‘Comox’, and Rubus strigosus. It is a recent release with compact, easily managed growth habit and large, firm fruit. It has genes derived from an entirely new and distinct source of Rubus strigosus, the North American red raspberry. This cultivar was released with Chaim Kempler. F. Current Activities Currently Hugh is an Emeritus Research Scientist with the Pacific Agricultural Research Centre of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. He resides in the Point Grey area of Vancouver close to the UBC. Hugh is active in Seeds of Diversity Canada, a nongovernment/nonprofit organization dedicated to the conservation of endangered or rare cultivars of vegetables, fruits, flowers, and grain crops. He regularly writes for the

1. DEDICATION

31

magazine and each issue (three per year) he contributes ‘‘News of Diversity’’ with items summarized from the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) Plant Breeding News, The Garden (from the Royal Horticultural Society), American Society for Horticultural Science publications, newspapers (particularly the Weekly Guardian from the United Kingdom), and various other sources. He completed a term as president of Seeds of Diversity Canada and after 9 years decided it was time to quit the board, although he still writes articles for the organization. He has specialized in articles that highlight the significant of major fruit cultivars: ‘Lloyd George’ raspberry, ‘Willamette’ raspberry, ‘Heritage’ raspberry, ‘Tulameen’ raspberry, ‘Cox’s Orange Pippin’ apple, ‘Granny Smith’ apple, and ‘Senga Sengana’ strawberry. He is an active Friend of the Garden at the University of British Columbia (UBC) Botanical Garden and is currently a member of the executive committee and program chair. He purchases native plants from specialty wholesale nurseries and does some propagation for the annual perennial and native plant sale and for the popular Plant Centre. He also has permission to propagate ‘Totem’ strawberry and ‘Tulameen’ raspberry for sale at the Botanical Garden Centre. He is active in the Native Plant Society of British Columbia and is currently on its board. He regularly writes article for their thrice-yearly publication Menziesia. He also writes for the Cider Press, a publication of the nonprofessional BC Fruit Testers Association, and occasionally for Davidsonia, a publication of the UBC Botanical Garden, and GardenWise, a local gardening magazine. Hugh and Marian have been active hikers and twice trekked in the Himalayas, the first time in the mountains in the North India in August when the alpine flora is at its peak and the second time in East India (Sikkim in April), primarily to look at rhododendrons. The second trek was marred, by eye problems for Hugh—a detached retina in an isolated site at a high altitude (about 4000m). His eye was badly damaged, and he could not receive medical attention until he returned to Vancouver 10 days later. Since then he has suffered a series of eye problems. Hugh was an avid runner and did several marathons. He now has begun power walking with poles, an activity that gives great confidence to sight-impaired persons. He also does water exercises on a regular basis. He still is an enthusiastic gardener in Vancouver and at his cottage at Reider Lake. Hugh and Marian have three grown children. Son Peter is a consulting geologist, currently working in Saskatchewan. Older daughter Jennifer is with Foreign Affairs in Ottawa and director of Canadian trade in Near Eastern and African countries. Younger

32

KIM E. HUMMER, ET AL.

daughter Carolyn is a therapist at a clinic on the UBC campus. She is also a part-time track and field coach and travels both nationally and internationally as part of the support group of teams competing in various events. Jennifer and her husband, Dave, have two sons, Alex and Eric, whom the grandparents visit as much as possible. G. Awards and Honors Hugh is a fellow of the American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS) and was president of the American Pomological Society (APS) in 1978–1979. He is recipient of the Wilder Medal (1986) from the APS. He received outstanding cultivar awards for ‘Totem’ from the Canadian Society for Horticultural Science (CSHS), and for ‘Tulameen’ from both the CSHS and ASHS. In 1994 he received an honorary D.Sc. from MacDonald College of McGill University, Montreal. Hugh has published more than 90 reviewed papers and several book chapters. He has innumerable miscellaneous papers and bulletins to his credit and has presented more than 500 reports to industry meetings over the years. He has spoken to industry groups in Australia, Chile, Argentina, Washington State, Oregon, Ontario, as well as locally. He participated in a program review in New Zealand and assisted in establishing a successful raspberry breeding program in Victoria, Australia. He was on the editorial board of the Canadian Journal of Plant Science for six years and editor of 2 volumes of Acta Horticulturae, based on Rubus/ Ribes symposia in 1980 and 1989, respectively. He was assigned to Agricultural Canada’s Expert Committee on Gene Resources for 6 years. This important post lead to his invitation to serve as executive and President of Seeds of Diversity of Canada, where he served for 9 years. Hugh has been involved as a contributing author for the New Fruit and Nut Varieties list for raspberries and strawberries, since 1970. He became the author for the raspberries section from 1991 to present and in strawberries from 1994. For List 38, published in 1997, he prepared descriptions of blackberry and hybrid berries, currant, gooseberry, and strawberry as well as raspberry. He continues to prepare descriptions of raspberry cultivars for the HortScience listings. Hugh has twice been chair of the Rubus-Ribes Working Group of the International Society for Horticultural Science and, as such, successfully organized 2 of the Group’s symposia. For many years he was a director of the Lower Mainland Horticultural Improvement Association. For more than 30 years he presented talks at their annual meetings. He also participated in similar growers’ organizations in Washington and Oregon, and was invited to talk to groups in Ontario

1. DEDICATION

33

several times and to the North American Strawberry Growers Association and the North American Bramble Growers Association. Hugh Daubeny, berry geneticist and breeder, collaborator, and friend, has had a distinguished career. He continues to motivate and educate the scientific community. His compassion for the environment and acute awareness of the need to conserve wild genetic resources provides a direct lesson for our time. He has brought us great riches in the form of his cultivars, which have become classic standards for raspberries and strawberries. His life and work is an inspiration for us now and for the future. IV. SELECTED PUBLICATIONS OF HUGH A. DAUBENY A. Journal Articles Barritt, B. H., and H. A. Daubeny. 1982. Inheritance of virus tolerance in strawberry. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 107:278–282. Baumann, T. E., and H. A. Daubeny. 1989. Evaluation of the waiting-bed cultural system for strawberry season extension in British Columbia. Adv. Strawberry Prod. 8:55–57. Bristow, P. R., H. A. Daubeny, T. M. Sjulin, H. S. Pepin, R. Nestby, and G. E. Windom. 1988. Evaluation of Rubus germplasm for reaction to root rot caused by Phytophthora erythroseptica. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 113:588–591. Buonassisi, A. J., H. A. Daubeny, and B. Peters. 1989. The B.C. Raspberry certification program. Acta Hort. 262:175–180. Cousineau, J. C., A. K. Anderson, and H. A. Daubeny. 1993. Characterization of red raspberry cultivars and selections using isoenzyme analysis. HortScience 28:1185– 1186. Cram, W. T., and H. A. Daubeny. 1982. Responses of black vine weevil adults fed foliage from genotypes of strawberry, red raspberry, and red raspberry-blackberry hybrids. HortScience 17:771–773. Dale, A., and H. A. Daubeny. 1985. Genotype-environment interactions involving British and Pacific Northwest red raspberry cultivars. HortScience 20:68–69. Dale, A., and H. A. Daubeny. 1987. Flower-bud initiation in red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) in two environments. Crop. Res. (Hort. Res.) 27:61–66. Daubeny, H. A. 1961a. Earliness in tomato varieties with special reference to the ability to set fruit at low temperatures. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 78:445–449. Daubeny, H. A. 1961b. Powdery mildew resistance in strawberry progenies. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 41:239–243. Daubeny, H. A. 1964. Effect of parentage in breeding for red stele resistance of strawberry in British Columbia. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 84:289–294. Daubeny, H. A. 1966. Inheritance of immunity in the red raspberry to the North American strain of the aphid. Amphorophora rubi Kltb. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 88:346–351. Daubeny, H. A. 1971. Self-fertility in red raspberry cultivars and selections. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 96:588–591. Daubeny, H. A. 1972. Screening red raspberry cultivars and selections for immunity to Amphorophora agathonica. HortScience 7:265–266.

34

KIM E. HUMMER, ET AL.

Daubeny, H. A. 1978. Red raspberry cultivars for the Pacific Northwest. Fruit Var. J. 32:89–93. Daubeny, H. A. 1980. Red raspberry cultivar development in British Columbia with special reference to pest response and germplasm exploitation. Acta Hort. 112:59–67. Daubeny, H. A. 1983a. Expansion of genetic resources available to red raspberry breeding programs. Proc. 21st. Int. Hort. Congr. 1:150–155. Daubeny, H. A. 1983b. Red raspberry breeding in British Columbia. HortScience 18:268. Daubeny, H. A. 1986. The British Columbia raspberry breeding program since 1980. Acta Hort. 183:47–58. Daubeny, H. A. 1987. A hypothesis for inheritance of resistance to cane Botrytis in red raspberry. HortScience 22:116–119. Daubeny, H. A. 1990 Strawberry breeding in Canada. HortScience 25:893–894. Daubeny, H. A. 1995. Sustained funding support needed for fruit breeding programs. Heritage Seed Program 8:26–30. Daubeny, H. A. 1997. Raspberry breeding in Canada: 1920 to 1995. Fruit Var. J. 51:228–233. Daubeny, H. A. 2002. Raspberry breeding in the 21st century. Acta Hort. 585:69–72. Daubeny, H. A. 2003a. British Columbia’s Pacific Coast beach strawberry—Fragaria chiloensis. Davidsonia 14:5–11. Daubeny, H. A. 2003b. The North American red raspberry—a genetic resource awaiting exploitation. Davidsonia 14:145–151. Daubeny, H. A. 2006. History of the British Columbia raspberry breeding programme. Davidsonia 17:9–21. Daubeny, H. A., and A. K. Anderson. 1989. Germplasm enhancement in the British Columbia raspberry breeding program. Acta Hort. 262:61–64. Daubeny, H. A., and A. K. Anderson. 1993. Achievements and prospects: The British Columbia red raspberry breeding program. Acta Hort. 352:285–293. Daubeny, H. A., P. C. Crandall, and G. W. Eaton. 1967. Crumbliness in red raspberry with special reference to the ‘Sumner’ variety. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 91:224–230. Daubeny, H. A., A. Dale, and G. R. McGregor. 1986. Estimating yields of red raspberries in small research plots. HortScience 21:1216–1217. Daubeny, H. A., and C. D. Fear. 1992. Primocane fruiting raspberries in the Pacific Northwest and California. Fruit Var. J. 46:197–199. Daubeny, H. A., J. A. Freeman, and H. S. Pepin. 1974. Two techniques for assessing preharvest fungicide treatments on postharvest fruit rot of red raspberry. Plant Dis. Reptr. 58:391–395. Daubeny, H. A., J. A. Freeman, and R. Stace-Smith. 1970. Effects of virus infection on drupelet set of four red raspberry cultivars. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 95:730–731. Daubeny, H. A., J. A. Freeman, and R. Stace-Smith. 1975. Effects of tomato ringspot virus on drupelet set of red raspberry cultivars. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 55:755–759. Daubeny, H. A., J. A. Freeman, and R. Stace-Smith. 1982. Effects of raspberry bushy dwarf virus on yield and cane growth in susceptible red raspberry cultivars. HortScience 17:645–647. Daubeny, H. A., R. A. Norton, C. D. Schwartz, and B. H. Barritt. 1970b. Winterhardiness in strawberries for the Pacific Northwest. HortScience 5:152–154. Daubeny, H. A., and H. S. Pepin. 1965. The relative resistance of various Fragaria chiloensis clones to Phytophthora fragariae. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 45:365–368. Daubeny, H. A., and H. S. Pepin. 1969. Variations in susceptibility to fruit rot among red raspberry cultivars. Plant Dis. Reptr. 53:975–977. Daubeny, H. A., and H. S. Pepin. 1974a. Susceptibility variations to spur blight (Didymella applanata) among red raspberry cultivars and selections. Plant Dis. Reptr. 58: 1024–1027.

1. DEDICATION

35

Daubeny, H. A., and H. S. Pepin. 1974b. Variations among red raspberry cultivars and selections in susceptibility to the fruit rot causal organisms Botrytis cinerea and Rhizopus spp. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 54:511–516. Daubeny, H. A., and H. S. Pepin. 1975a. Assessment of some red raspberry cultivars and selections as parents for resistance to spur blight. HortScience 10:404–405. Daubeny, H. A., and H. S. Pepin. 1975b. Fruit rot resistance in red raspberry. Fruit Var. J. 29:21. Daubeny, H. A., and H. S. Pepin. 1976. Recent developments in breeding for fruit rot resistance in red raspberry. Acta Hort. 60:63–72. Daubeny, H. A., and H. S. Pepin. 1977. Evaluation of strawberry clones for fruit rot resistance. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 102:431–435. Daubeny, H. A., and H. S. Pepin. 1981. Resistance of red raspberry fruit and canes to Botrytis. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 106:423–426. Daubeny, H. A., H. S. Pepin, and B. H. Barritt. 1980. Postharvest Rhizopus fruit rot resistance in red raspberry. HortScience 15:35–37. Daubeny, H. A., and R. Stace-Smith. 1963. Note on immunity to the North American strain of the red raspberry mosaic vector, the aphid, Amphorophora rubi. Kalb. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 43:413–414. Daubeny, H. A., R. Stace-Smith, and J. A. Freeman. 1978. The occurrence and some effects of raspberry bushy dwarf virus in red raspberry. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 103:519–522. Daubeny, H.A., and D. Stary. 1982. Identification of resistance to Amphorophora agathonica in the native North American red raspberry. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 107:593–597. Daubeny, H. A., P. B. Topham, and D. L. Jennings. 1968. A comparison of methods for analyzing inheritance data for resistance to red raspberry powdery mildew. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 10:341–350. Donnelly, D. J., and H. A. Daubeny. 1986. Tissue culture of Rubus species. Acta Hort. 183:305–314. Donnelly, D. J., F. E. Skelton, and H. A. Daubeny. 1986. External leaf features of tissuecultured ‘Silvan’ blackberry. HortScience 21:306–308. Freeman, J. A., and H. A. Daubeny. 1986. Effect of chemical removal of primocanes on several raspberry cultivars. Acta Hort. 183:215–222. Freeman, J. A., G. W. Eaton, T. E. Baumann, and H. A. Daubeny. 1989. Primocane removal enhances yield components of raspberries. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114:6–9. Freeman, J. R., V. R. Brookes, and H. A. Daubeny. 1989. Effect of continual primocane removal on several raspberry cultivars. Acta Hort. 262:341–348. Hall, H. K., and H. A. Daubeny. 1999. Introduced germplasm in the New Zealand raspberry industry and breeding programme. Acta Hort. 505:59–63. Hoover, E. E., J. J. Luby, D. S. Bedford, M. P. Pritts, E. J. Hanson, A. Dale, and H. A. Daubeny. 1989. Temperature influence on harvest date and cane development of primocane-fruiting red raspberries. Acta Hort. 626:297–303. John, M. K., and H. A. Daubeny. 1972. Influence of genotype, date of sampling and age of plant on leaf chemical composition of red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.). J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 97:740–742. John, M. K., H. A. Daubeny, and F. D. McElroy. 1975. Influence of sampling time on elemental composition of strawberry leaves and petioles. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 100:513– 517. Kempler, C., and H. A. Daubeny. 1999. Development of fresh market raspberry cultivars. Acta Hort. 505:121–126. Levesque, C. A., and H. A. Daubeny. 1999. Variation in reaction to Phytophthora fragariae var. Rubi in raspberry genotypes. Acta Hort. 505:231–235.

36

KIM E. HUMMER, ET AL.

Misˇic´, P. D., Z. V. Tesovic, H. A. Daubeny, and H. S. Pepin. 1975. Relative resistance to spur blight (Didymella applanata) among red, purple and black raspberry cultivars and selections in Yugoslavia. Plant Dis. Reptr. 59:571–573. Moore, P. P., and H. A. Daubeny. 1993. ‘Meeker’ red raspberry. Fruit Var. J. 47:2–4. Parliman, B. J., and H. A. Daubeny. 1988. Considerations for effective exchange of clonally propagated plant germplasm. HortScience 23:67–73. Shamaila, M., B. Skukra, H. A. Daubeny, and A. K. Anderson. 1993. Sensory, chemical and gas chromatographic evaluation of five raspberry cultivars. Food Res. Int. 26:443–449. Stace-Smith, R., H. A. Daubeny, P. R. Bristow, and G. Baumann. 1982. Incidence of sap transmitted viruses in experimental and commercial plantings of red raspberries. Acta Hort. 129:91–101. Vrain, T. C., and H. A. Daubeny. 1986. Relative resistance of red raspberry and related genotypes to the root lesion nematode. HortScience 21:1435–1437. Vrain, T. C., H. A. Daubeny, J. W. Hall, R. M. DeYoung, and A. K. Anderson. 1994. Inheritance of resistance to root lesion nematode in red raspberry. HortScience 29:1340– 1341.

B. Book Chapters Crandall, P. C., and H. A. Daubeny. 1990. Raspberry management. pp. 157–213. In: G. J. Galletta and D. G. Himelrick (eds.), Small fruit crop management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Daubeny, H. A. 1983. Insect, mite and nematode resistance. pp. 216–241. In: J. N. Moore and J. Janick (eds.), Methods in fruit breeding. Purdue Univ. Press, West Lafayette, IN. Daubeny, H. A. 1996. Brambles. pp. 109–190. In: J. Janick and J. N. Moore (eds.), Fruit breeding: Vol. II. Vine and small fruit crops. Wiley, New York. Daubeny, H. A., and A. K. Anderson. 1991. Strawberry breeding in British Columbia. In: A. Dale and J. J. Luby (eds.), The strawberry into the 21st century. Timberline Press, Portland, OR. Jennings, D. L., H. A. Daubeny, and J. N. Moore. 1991. Blackberries and raspberries (Rubus). In: Genetic resources of temperate fruit and nut crops. Acta Hort. 290:331–389. Khanizadeh, S., H. A. Daubeny, and J. A. Sullivan. 2005. Canadian strawberry breeders. pp. 14–22. In: S. Khanizadeh and J. De Ell (eds.), Our strawberries/les fraisiers de chez nous. Publishing and Depository Services, Ottawa, Ontario.

C. Cultivar Release Notices Daubeny, H. A. 1969. Matsqui red raspberry. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 49:227. Daubeny, H. A. 1973. Haida red raspberry. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 53:345–346. Daubeny, H. A. 1978a. Chilcotin red raspberry. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 58:279–282. Daubeny, H. A. 1978b. Nootka red raspberry. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 58:899–901. Daubeny, H. A. 1978c. Skeena red raspberry. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 58:565–568. Daubeny, H. A. 1987a. ‘Chilliwack’ and ‘Comox’ red raspberries. HortScience 22:1343– 1345. Daubeny, H. A. 1987b. ‘Sumas’ strawberry. HortScience 22:511–513. Daubeny, H. A., and A. K. Anderson. 1991. ‘Tulameen’ red raspberry. HortScience 26:1336–1338. Daubeny, H. A., A. Dale, P. P. Moore, A. R. Jamieson, O. Callesen, and H. K. Hall. 1991. Algonquin red raspberry. Fruit Var. J. 45:122–124.

1. DEDICATION

37

Daubeny, H. A., and C. Kempler. 1995. ‘Qualicum’ red raspberry. HortScience 30:1470– 1472. Daubeny, H. A., and C. Kempler. 1997. ‘Nanaimo’ strawberry. HortScience 32:1293–1294. Daubeny, H. A., and C. Kempler. 2003. ‘Tulameen’ red raspberry. Journal of the American Pomological Society 57:42. Daubeny, H. A., F. J. Lawrence, and P. P. Moore. 1993. ‘Totem’ strawberry. Fruit Var. J. 47:182–184. Daubeny, H. A., and T. M. Sjulin. 1984. BC 72–1–7 red raspberry. HortScience 19:733–734. Kempler, C., and H. A. Daubeny. 2000. ‘Malahat’ red raspberry. HortScience 35:783–785. Kempler, C., H. A. Daubeny, L. Frey, and T. Walters. 2006. ‘Chemainus’ red raspberry. HortScience 41:1364–1366. Kempler, C., H. A. Daubeny, B. Harding, T. Baumann, C. E. Finn, P. P. Moore, M. Sweeney, and T. Walters. 2007. ‘Saanich’ red raspberry. HortScience 42:176–178. Kempler, C., H. A. Daubeny, B. Harding, and C. E. Finn. 2005. ‘Esquimalt’ red raspberry. HortScience 40:2192–2194. Kempler, C., H. A. Daubeny, B. Harding, and C. G. Kowalenko. 2005. ‘Cowichan’ red raspberry. HortScience 40:1916–1918. Moore, P. P., T. M. Sjulin, B. H. Barritt, and H. A. Daubeny. 1990. ‘Centennial’ red raspberry. HortScience 25:484–485. (Pat Moore cultivar release, Hugh Daubeny collaborator.)

2 Raspberry Breeding and Genetics Harvey K. Hall Shekinah Berries Ltd 1 Clay Street Motueka 7120, New Zealand Kim E. Hummer USDA-ARS Clonal Germplasm Repository 33447 Peoria Road Corvallis, Oregon, 97330-2521 USA Andrew R. Jamieson Fruit Breeding Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada 32 Main Street Kentville, Nova Scotia, B4N 1J5 Canada S. Nikki Jennings Mylnefield Research Services Ltd. Scottish Crop Research Institute Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA Scotland Courtney A. Weber Department of Horticultural Sciences Cornell University New York State Agricultural Experiment Station Geneva, NY 14456 USA

Plant Breeding Reviews, Volume 32 Edited by Jules Janick Copyright & 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 39

40

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION, 45 A. Preface, 50 B. Origin and Speciation, 51 1. Dispersal 2. Environmental Adaptation 3. Diversity 4. Traditional Uses from the Wild C. History of Improvement, 59 1. Domestication 2. Floricane Fruiting 3. Primocane Fruiting D. World Industry, 66 1. North America 2. Australasia 3. China and East Asia 4. Russian Federation and the Ukraine 5. Europe 6. Eastern Europe 7. Southern Europe 8. Africa 9. South America E. Uses, 72 F. Breeding Objectives, 73 II. GERMPLASM RESOURCES, EXPLORATION, AND MAINTENANCE, 75 A. Acquisition of New Germplasm, 73 B. Value of Clonal Germplasm versus Seed, 79 C. Germplasm Preservation, 81 D. Pathogens and Safe International Plant Movement, 85 E. Germplasm Assessment and Publication of Data, 89 F. Germplasm Needs as Delineated by Traits, 89 III. BREEDING TECHNOLOGY, 90 A. Floral Biology, 90 B. Hybridization, 92 C. Seed Extraction and Storage, 94 D. Seed Treatment and Germination, 95 E. Seedling Evaluation, 97 F. Selection Evaluation, 102 G. Privatization, Plant Patent/PVR Descriptions and Strategies, 108 H. Cultivar Release and Commercialization, 115 I. Propagation, 116 1. Suckers, Canes, and Transplants 2. Roots 3. Root Cuttings and Other Traditional Methods 4. Shoot Cuttings 5. In Vitro 6. High-Health Stock and Trueness to Type 7. Genetic Stability

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS J. Molecular Techniques, 126 1. Diversity and Taxonomy 2. Cultivar Identification 3. Inheritance and Genetic Mapping 4. Genetic Transformation IV. BREEDING SYSTEMS, 135 A. Genetic Structure, 135 B. Breeding Strategy, 137 C. Response to Selection, 143 D. Interspecific Hybridization, 146 E. Inheritance Patterns, 152 V. BREEDING FOR SPECIFIC CHARACTERS, 153 A. Adaptation, 153 1. Cold-hardiness 2. Cool Conditions 3. Low-Chill Climates and Hot Conditions 4. Greenhouses and Tunnels 5. Other Adverse Environmental Conditions B. Diseases and Pests, 184 C. Resistance to Fungal Diseases, 186 D. Fungal Diseases Attacking Roots, 187 1. Phytophthora Root Rot 2. Other Phytophthora Species 3. Verticillium Wilt 4. Other Root Diseases E. Fruit Rots, 196 1. Botrytis Fruit Rot 2. Minor Fruit Rots F. Cane and Leaf Diseases, 202 1. Spur Blight 2. Cane Blight 3. Fusarium Wilt 4. Anthracnose or Cane Spot 5. Cane Botrytis 6. Raspberry Leaf Spot 7. Powdery Mildew 8. Ascospora Dieback 9. Sydowiella and Gnomonia Cane Cankers 10. Nectria Canker 11. Silver Leaf 12. Rosette or Double Blossom 13. Downy Mildew 14. Yellow Rust 15. Late Leaf Rust 16. Orange Rust 17. Cane and Leaf Rust G. Resistance to Bacterial Diseases, 219 1. Crown Gall 2. Fire Blight

41

42

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

H.

I.

J.

K.

3. Pseudomonas Blight 4. Other Bacterial Diseases Resistance to Pests, 221 1. Aphids 2. Cane Midge 3. Raspberry Beetle and Raspberry Fruitworm 4. Cantharid Beetle 5. Weevils 6. Nematodes 7. Mites 8. Raspberry Moth 9. Raspberry Cane Borer 10. Raspberry Bud Moth 11. Grass Grub 12. Double Dart Moth Resistance to Virus Diseases, 242 1. Pollen and Seed Transmitted Viruses 2. Aphid-Transmitted Viruses 3. Nematode-Transmitted Viruses 4. Viruslike Diseases Plant Growth, 247 1. Roots 2. Cane Number 3. Cane Growth 4. Spinelessness 5. Bud Break 6. Lateral Structure 7. Fruit Numbers per Lateral/Fruiting Node 8. Yield Components 9. Total Yield 10. Leaves 11. Primocane Fruiting Fruit Quality, 275 1. Structure 2. Skin Strength 3. Fruit Texture 4. Coherence 5. Flavor 6. Fresh-Market Flavor 7. Processing Flavor 8. Aroma 9. Sugar Content 10. Acidity 11. Seediness 12. Appearance 13. Color 14. Shelf Life 15. Ability to Be Transported 16. Shape 17. Fruit Size

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

43

18. Pests and Disease 19. Environmental Concerns 20. Suitability for Different Uses 21. Nutritional and Pharmochemical Content L. Machine Harvesting, 298 VI. ACHIEVEMENTS AND PROSPECTS, 309 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS LITERATURE CITED

ABBREVIATIONS AFLP Amplified fragment length polymorphism CU-NYSAES Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, New York DSA Driscoll Strawberry Associates, at Watsonville, California EC European Economic Community ELISA Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay EMR East Malling Research (Horticulture Research International East Malling from 1991 and prior to that East Malling Research Station) at East Malling, Kent, England GRIN United States Department of Agriculture, Germplasm Resources Information Network HRNZ Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Ltd, HortResearch, Riwaka, New Zealand IPM Integrated pest management IQF Individually quick frozen ISSR Inter simple sequence repeats MAS Marker-assisted selection MRL Maximum residue level ORUS Oregon State University—United States Department of Agriculture at Corvallis, Oregon PARC-BC Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada’s (AAFC’s), Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, British Columbia RACER Reduced application of chemicals in European raspberry production RAPD Random amplified polymorphic DNA RBDV Raspberry bushy dwarf virus RB-RBDV Resistance breaking strain of Raspberry bushy dwarf virus SCRI Scottish Crop Research Institute, Dundee, Scotland SSR Simple sequence repeats WSU Washington State University, Puyallup, Washington

44

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

Raspis The Raspis is called in Greeke Ba´toB ı´daa: in Latine Rubus Idaus, of the mountaine Ida on which it groweth: in English Raspis, Framboise, and Hindberry *The temperature and vertues. The young buds or tender tops of the Bramble Bush, the flowers, the leaves, and the unripe fruit, do very much dry and binde withal: being chewed they take away the heate and inflammation of the mouth, and almonds of the throte; they stay the bloudy flix, and other fluxes, and all maner of bleedings; of the same force is their decoction, with a little honie added. They heale the eyes that hang out; hard knots in the fundamen; and staie the hermorrhoids, if the leaves be laid thereunto. The iuice which is pressed out of the stalkes leaves, and unripe berrie, and made hard in the sun, is more effectual for all those things. The ripe fruit is sweete, and containeth in it much iuice of a temperate heate, therefore it is not unpleasant to be eaten. It hath also a certaine kinde of astriction or binding qualitie. It is likewise for that cause holsome for the stomake; and if a man eate too largely therof, saith Galen, he shall have the headach: but being dried whilest it is yet unripe, it bindeth and drieth more than the ripe fruit. The roote besides that it is binding, containeth in it much thin substance, by reason whereof it wasteth awai the stones in the kidneies, saith Galen. Plinie writeth, that the berries and flowers do provoke urine, and that the decoction of them in wine, is a present remedie against the stone. The leaves of the Bramble, boiled in water, with honie, alum, and a little white wine added thereto, make a most excellent lotion or washing water, to heale the sores in the mouth, the privie parts of man or woman; and the same decoction fastneth the teeth. The Raspis is thought to be like the Bramble, in temperature and vertues, but not so much binding or drying. The Raspis, saith Dioscorides, performeth those things which the Bramble doth. The fruit is good to be given to those that have weake and queasie stomacks. Gerard 1597

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

45

I. INTRODUCTION The earliest records of raspberry in western civilization date to the ancient Greeks (Hummer and Janick 2007). Brambles were documented in the writings of Aeschylus (Hendrickson 1981) and Hippocrates, between 500 to 400 BCE. Raspberries were cultivated by the Greeks as early as 370 BCE (Handley and Pritts 1989). Marcus Porcius Cato (234– 149 BCE), known as Cato the Elder, refers to brambles as weeds to be pulled (spinas runcari) in his work De Re Rustica (De Agricultura) (Hooper and Ash 1934). Publius Ovidius Naso, known as Ovid (43 BCE–17 CE) also mentions wild brambles in Metamorphosis (Miller 1999). Pedanius Dioscorides described the medical uses of raspberries, Batos idaea, in his De Materia Medica, ca. 50 CE (Anicia 512). He also described thornless types. Up to this time Rubus was known for medicinal purposes. About 65 BCE, Pompey introduced raspberries from southeast Troy, now Turkey, to Rome (Trager 1995). Rutilius Taurus Aemilianus Palladius, a Roman writer of the fourth century CE, provided the earliest remaining account of raspberry domestication (Graham et al. 2007; Jennings 1988). Raspberry seeds, dating to Roman times, were discovered in Roman forts in Britain, so most likely Roman soldiers spread the cultivation of this plant throughout Europe. In Russia raspberries were consumed in a decoction with bilberry prior to the establishment of Moscow in 1147 (Zhukovskii 1950). Red raspberries were popularized and selected in Europe throughout the Middle Ages. Europeans were not the only ones to recognize medicinal values in raspberries. Asian raspberries, specifically Rubus chingii Hu, fupen-tzu, fruit was documented in the Ming I pieh lu, a Chinese herbal dating to the end of the Liang Dynasty before 300 CE (Hsu et al. 1986). This fruit was used for impotence, involuntary emission, enuresis, urinary frequency, and dizziness. Another Asian raspberry, Rubus parvifolius L., Tzu-po, is a traditional folk medicine of Taiwan (Hsu et al. 1986) and is used to reduce fever, rheumatoid arthritis, functional bleeding, edema, external and internal trauma, and toxic swelling, among other benefits. In Europe, yellow-fruited forms, a color mutant of the common redfruited R. idaeus L. subsp. vulgatus Arrh. (hereafter referred to as R. idaeus), were documented by the late 1500s. John Parkinson described red, white, and thornless raspis-berries suitable for the English climate (Jennings 1988). Raspberries were grown for the London market by gardeners of Chiswick and Brentford in the time of

46

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

Fig. 1. Woodcut of raspberry from Gerard’s herbal of 1633.

Shakespeare (Jennings 1988). Richard Weston mentioned a ‘‘twicebearing kind’’ in 1780 (Jennings 1988). In old English, raspberries (Fig. 1) were known as hyndberries, raspis, or raspes, giving rise to the modern term raspberry. In German, raspberries are known as himbeeren; in Denmark, as bringebær; in

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

47

Sweden, as hallon; in Italy, as lampone; in France, as framboise; in the Netherlands, as framboos; in Spanish, as frambuesa; and in eastern European languages, as malina. Raspberries were exported to the American colonies in the 1700s (Graham et al. 2007). Probably one or more selections of the American red raspberry, R. idaeus L. subsp. strigosus Michx (hereafter referred to as R. strigosus) were cultivated in America by 1800 (Darrow 1937). In 1771 W. Prince was the first to sell raspberry plants commercially in New York. His son, W. R. Prince, published a pomological manual in 1832 with descriptions of 20 cultivars (Jennings 1988). The American Pomological Society recommended 4 European red raspberries in 1853 and 14 European and 6 American cultivars by 1891 (Hedrick 1925). The European raspberries proved less adapted than the local forms to the extremes of summer and winter weather of America. Great improvements in red raspberry occurred when European red raspberries, R. idaeus, were crossed with American red raspberries, R. strigosus (Jennings 1988). The American subspecies differs from European R. idaeus by having hardier canes, which are thinner, taller, and more erect. Fruit are usually round and seldom conical like R. idaeus, and in the wild fruit sometimes are larger than the European subspecies (Jennings 1988). The cultivar ‘Cuthbert’, most likely a cross between R. idaeus ‘Hudson River Antwerp’ and a native R. strigosus, was discovered about 1865 and remains as a valuable cultivar and source of useful traits to the present (Plate 2B). ‘Lloyd George,’ a cultivar selected from a wood in Dorsett or Kent in the United Kingdom in 1919 (Knight et al. 1972; Leemans and Nannenga 1957) and introduced into the United States from Puyallup, Washington, in 1943, became a very successful parent and was widely used by raspberry breeders for decades (Plate 2C). ‘Lloyd George’ was a very useful source of fruit quality, yield, and the primocane fruiting trait and a source of resistance to the North American aphid, Amphorophora agathonica Hottes, the vector of the raspberry mosaic virus (Daubeny and Stary 1982; Huber and Schwartze 1938; Schwartze and Huber 1937). The widespread use of ‘Lloyd George’ for breeding both primocane fruiting and floricane fruiting cultivars of raspberries and the use of a very limited range of other cultivars as a source of founding clones for raspberry breeding has enabled accelerated progress in terms of fixing some traits. However, it has also undermined the future of raspberry breeding by creating a bottleneck through reducing diversity and increasing the amount of inbreeding in the gene pool. By 1992 an assessment of the genetic base of modern raspberries showed that they were descended from as few as 25 founding clones, or

48

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

likely less if some of these clones prove to be closely related, as is likely from their origin (Dale et al. 1993). Domestication has clearly reduced genetic and morphological diversity in red raspberry, with modern cultivars being genetically very similar (Gordon et al. 2005). Restricted genetic diversity is of serious concern for future Rubus breeding, especially when seeking durable resistance to aggressive pests and diseases for which the repeated use of pesticides is ineffective, unsustainable, or unacceptable in some markets, especially for ‘‘organic production’’ (Gordon et al. 2005). Incorporation of durable resistances to pests and diseases is essential for the development of cultivars suitable for production under integrated pest management (IPM) systems. Some efforts have been expended in breeding to increase the number of founding clones in new cultivars, but future breeders still must keep this bottleneck in mind. Raspberry growing and production, especially for fresh-market sales, has expanded considerably in recent years. The range of adaptation for raspberries has been increased considerably from the natural range of wild raspberries, into regions with hotter summer temperatures, higher humidity, lower chill, and/or subject to pests and diseases that would devastate the crop without a routine spray program. Some of this expansion has been made possible by the development of new cultivars utilizing adaptive traits from wild species. Other advances into new production zones have been made possible by changes in cultural methods, the use of long cane production through transportation of canes from cool climate nurseries, and through the use of cold stores to give artificial chill. Examples of cultivars with adaptive traits for these characters include ‘Autumn Bliss’, ‘Chilliwack’, and DSA cultivars, especially ‘Joe Mello’ and ‘Isabel’, ‘Glen Ample’, ‘Glen Lyon’, ‘Joan Squire’, ‘Motueka’, ‘Moutere’, ‘Tadmor’ and ‘Tulameen’. Fruit quality for fresh-market cultivars also has improved greatly, allowing earlier picking to be done and fruit to be transported long distances to markets. New technology has resulted in the development of see-through clamshell or sealed containers (Fig. 2) so that fruit can be more easily handled during shipment, storage, and at the point of sale. Efficient handling protocols have been developed to quickly transport harvested fruit to a cool store for removal of field heat and for transportation to the point of sale, to maintain the cool chain throughout the handling process. Fruit firmness and skin strength have been improved to reduce handling damage, and cultivars have been developed that are less susceptible to fruit rots in the field or after harvest, allowing long shelf life in storage. Another significant advance in fruit quality has been the selection of cultivars that remain a light, bright red

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

49

Fig. 2. Clear clamshell for raspberry fresh marketing. (photo by Driscoll’s).

color during storage, giving the appearance of freshness throughout their storage life. Raspberries developed for fresh markets have reduced acidity, greater sweetness, and a fresh, light flavor that is sensed on the tip of the tongue, rather than well back in the mouth, as with the strongflavored processing types. Significant advances for processing cultivars in recent years have been the development of machines for harvesting high-quality fruit and improved equipment for producing an individually quick frozen (IQF) product (Fig. 3) with most of the production of a machine harvest cultivar. Mechanical harvesting, principally in the Pacific Northwest of North America, has expanded significantly, but in recent years hand harvest production of process raspberries has expanded in Chile, Serbia, and Poland. Cheap labor is used to compete with the machine-harvested product from developed nations, and hand harvest production is also likely to rise in China. Process production in Scotland has diminished partly due to competition from eastern Europe (Jennings et. al. 2008). However, demand from multiple retailers for fresh raspberries has led to a shift in production toward the fresh market and protected cropping, which now accounts for approximately 80% of Scottish raspberry production. As the fresh raspberry industry has expanded, breeding of new cultivars, marketing, and production has shifted from smaller local producers to larger companies that have become multinational in their production and marketing operations. These include Driscoll

50

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

Fig. 3. Individually quick-frozen (IQF) raspberries. (photo by H.K. Hall).

Strawberry Associates (Watsonville, California) (DSA), Hortifrut, Inc. (Santiago, Chile, and Naples, Florida), and Redbridge/Redeva (Peterborough, U.K.), as breeders, growers, and marketers, and Plant Sciences (Watsonville, California), and Five Aces Breeding, LLC (Laurel, Maryland) as producers of new cultivars for multinational producers and marketers. DSA spans both these roles, having production bases in several countries. It licenses cultivars to producers and marketers, such as Auzfresh in Australia and KG Fruits/Berry Gardens in the United Kingdom. Many state-funded breeding programs have been terminated and new programs have been initiated by private companies with a large stake in fresh-market production. Larger process-raspberry producers and nursery companies also have taken a stake in the development of new cultivars. High-quality processing types with more dependable production and reduced problems with pests and diseases are promised, but these are likely to be tied to certain markets or breeding groups, and not free for all to access. A. Preface Cultivated species of Rubus (Rosaceae) became important horticultural crops in the 20th century due in large part to the efforts of plant breeders throughout the world. Detailed reviews of blackberry breeding

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

51

and genetics have been summarized in two issues of Plant Breeding Reviews by Hall (1990) and Clark et al. (2007). Our intention in this review was to do the same for raspberry, Rubus L. tribe rubae. Subsequently, the breadth of material warranted the publication of the review as a separate issue of Plant Breeding Reviews. Previously combined reviews of blackberry and raspberry breeding or reviews on aspects of raspberry breeding have been published by Darrow (1937; 1967), Haskell (1961), Sherman and Sharpe (1971), Ourecky (1975b), Jennings (1988), Keep (1988; 1989), Dale et al. (1989), Dale (1991), and Daubeny (1996). The first other review exclusively of raspberry breeding is Chapter 12, written by Finn (2008) in Temperate Fruit Crop Breeding. Germplasm to Genomics (Hancock 2008). B. Origin and Speciation 1. Dispersal. Raspberries are included among species of the genus Rubus L., Rosaceae Juss., nom. cons. Focke (1910, 1911, 1914) suggested division of the genus into 12 subgenera, and subsequent taxonomists have repeated his judgment. However, many of these were defined by similar morphological traits that have been shown to be polyphylogenic in molecular analysis (Alice and Campbell 1999). The United States Department of Agriculture Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN) recognizes 15 subgenera (GRIN 2007). A fruit of tribe Rubeae is an aggregate of drupelets that separate as a unit from a conical receptacle when ripe. Species in 5 Rubus subgenera—Idaeobatus, Cylactus, Anoplobatus, Chamaemorus, and Malachobatus—have this character. Although the main economic development in the commercial raspberry has thus far taken place in subgenus Idaeobatus, additional subgenera are mentioned because they may become larger contributors for the raspberry gene pool in future breeding efforts. R. idaeus L., the typic red raspberry species of the Idaeobatus, originated near the Ida Mountains of Asia Minor, now Turkey (Daubeny 1996; Hedrick 1925; Jennings 1988; Roach 1988). Idaeobatus contains about 200 wild species within nine sections. Most raspberry species are diploid ð2n ¼ 2x ¼ 14Þ, with a few triploid and tetraploid types (Thompson 1995a,b, 1997). Idaeobatus species are concentrated in northern Asia but are also located in Africa, Australia, Europe, and North America (Jennings 1988). The greatest diversity is found in southwest China, the likely center of origin of the subgenus. Raspberry species from the Rubus subgenera Cylactis (Arctic raspberry), Idaeobatus (raspberries), Anaplobatus (flowering raspberries), and Orobatus are native throughout the northern hemisphere,

52

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

primarily in the temperate, cool temperate, cold temperate, and subarctic climatic zones. In addition, a few species are also found in the tropics and the southern hemisphere. The main center of diversity is in Asia, principally within the borders of modern-day China, but extending southward through the Himalayas, into Bhutan and India and eastward into Korea and Japan. Locations more distant from this region have fewer species and less variability within the localized species. In contrast, some distant species—for example, the flowering raspberries and black raspberries of North America—show many differences from species found near the center of diversity. Malachobatus is also found mostly in China, though some are distributed in Malaysia and Australia. Raspberries, like other Rubus species, are adapted to consumption and spread by animals, particularly by birds and small mammals, which provide effective seed treatment. Normally they require scarification and stratification for germination to occur, and seed germination is promoted by light. Stratification requirements may be reduced in species adapted to either very cold or very warm conditions, allowing immediate germination when environmental conditions are suitable. The spread of raspberry species was likely from the Chinese center of raspberry diversity to the entire northern hemisphere, and speciation has occurred in response to isolation combined with genetic drift, selection pressure from different environments, and segregation among seedling populations spread and propagated by birds. The endemic natural ranges of present-day cultivated raspberry species are as follows: 1. Rubus subgenera Cylactis (Arctic raspberry) circumpolar above the Arctic Circle. 2. R. idaeus L. subsp. vulgatus (the European red raspberry—referred to as R. idaeus in this review) from Siberia to the United Kingdom. 3. R. idaeus L. subsp. strigosus Michx. (the North American red raspberry—referred to as R. strigosus in this review) from Nova Scotia to Alaska. 4. R. crataegifolius Bunge (the Korean tree raspberry) from eastern China through Korea and Japan. 5. R. coreanus Miquel (the Korean black raspberry) from eastern China through Korea and Japan. 6. R. occidentalis L. (the black raspberry) from New Brunswick to Ontario, south to Georgia and Missouri. 7. Adapted ranges of many nondomesticated or noncultivated raspberry species are available on the World Wide Web.

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

53

2. Environmental Adaptation. Raspberry species have a wide range of adaptation, from cold subarctic conditions inside the Arctic Circle to very warm or hot tropical conditions in Southeast Asia, Australia, and Africa, from very dry to very wet conditions, from high soil fertility to low, from low to high altitude, and from full light conditions to very low light as found within forest or jungle (Dale et al. 1994). Species from the subgenus Cylactis and Rubus chamaemorus L. are adapted to the cold conditions and short summers found above the Arctic Circle through low growth or underground rhizomes and short flowering laterals that spring up from the ground. Flowering and fruit production occurs in a short period, and the plant is protected from winter cold by keeping most of its growth underground or close to the surface. These species are also found farther south at higher altitudes. Cold-hardiness is also found in European, North American, and Asian raspberry species and is important for adaptation to colder environments in Central Europe and more northern locations in continental North America. Tropical species are adapted to low chill conditions and very high temperatures by requiring less chill accumulation to break dormancy and having a higher temperature tolerance (Jennings 1988; Natural Food 2006; Ourecky 1975b). Adaptation to high temperature conditions also is present to allow fruit to escape the effects of sunburn at high temperatures or fruit scald immediately after rainfall in high light and warm conditions. Adaptation to high light levels and high temperatures exists in the raspberry germplasm. The use of species with these traits will assist in developing adapted types suitable for growing in subtropical and tropical conditions where there is increasing interest in growing raspberries commercially. Tropical and subtropical species have been used in developing new cultivars suited to low-chill conditions in California (Fear and Meyer 1993) and the very warm summer conditions of southern and eastern states in the United States (Jennings 1988; Stafne et al. 2001). Raspberry cultivars are well adapted to deep, well-drained soils, but, as the availability of high-quality land has become more restricted, growers have been forced to use heavier and wetter soils. Little tolerance to these conditions exists in red raspberry cultivars, but several species in Asia and North America have the potential to give adaptation to these conditions (Ourecky 1975b). For example R. spectabilis Pursh is adapted to wetter locations near streams and could be used as a parent for this trait.

54

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

Fig. 4. Maxine Thompson and the low-growing Rubus crassifolius, in Guizhou, China. (photo by J. Postman).

Adaptation to low soil moisture or drought exists among raspberry species (Daubeny 1996; Drain 1939; Hull 1969; Jennings 1988; Ourecky 1975b; Overcash 1972), especially in R. strigosus, but selection for drought resistance has not been intentionally utilized in breeding for new raspberry cultivars. 3. Diversity. A great range of diversity exists among raspberry species, from low-growing or prostrate species such as R. chamaemorus L. and R. crassifolius (Fig. 4), less than 0.25 cm tall, to some that grow with thick blackberry-like canes, such as R. corchorifolius (Fig. 5), to very large spreading types such as R. ellipticus that grow 4 to 6 m tall with canes up to 10 cm thick (Darrow 1937). Some species are very upright, especially when grown in cool conditions, but others are spreading or prostrate. Temperate-adapted upright types frequently are less upright or even spreading when grown in warmer subtropical conditions. Leaves vary from entire or lobed to pinnately compound, with diameters reduced to less than 5 mm to 20 cm (Plate 1D). Most raspberry species have a biennial/perennial growth habit, producing vegetative biennial primocanes from the perennial crown in the first year and fruiting laterals on them in the second year, after which the canes senesce and die. Some species, such as R. odoratus, are fully perennial, having canes that persist and bear fruit year after year without dying off. While R. odoratus has been used in raspberry breeding, no selection has been focused on retaining the perennial trait.

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

55

Fig. 5. Rubus corchorifolius, with large blackberrylike canes. (photo by M. Thompson).

Other species are fully annual in their fruiting habit, with fruit produced on primocanes or on fruiting laterals sent up from the ground (as in R. arcticus), but the underground portion of the plant is perennial as in the biennial species. Some species have biennial canes but have some fruit on primocanes like the annual fruiting types. This trait has been utilized in cultivated R. idaeus to produce fully primocane fruiting cultivars that bear most of their crop on primocane growth. Flower and fruit size, shape, color, flavor, texture, and architecture vary considerably in raspberry species (Plate 1). Rubus idaeus and R. strigosus each have small flowers with small white petals and small to moderate-size sepals, usually 5 of each. These surround a receptacle with usually 30 to 60 ovules that develop into drupelets in the mature fruit. However, some raspberry species have considerably larger flowers with larger and more numerous petals, and sometimes over 500 ovules on the receptacle, as in R. sumatranus. Flower color in some species is very distinctive, with purple-lilac color in R. odoratus, pink in R. parvifolius, red-purple in R. spectabilis, and a deep rich red color in some Chinese species. Drupelet size is very small in many wild raspberry species, but it is large in some, such as the tetraploid wild type ‘‘Fengmanhong’’ (species as yet unconfirmed, but it has the appearance of a 4x variant of R. parvifolius) as found in Northern China (H. Dai, pers. comm.). Overall fruit size is also variable in the wild, with some species, such as the natural tetraploid ‘‘Fengmanhong,’’ with some fruit over 5 g in weight (Fig. 6). Some clones with very large fruit of more than 5 cm long

56

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

Fig. 6. ‘Fengmanhong’ tetraploid Rubus parvifolius photographed at Shenyang Agricultural University. (photo by H.K. Hall).

and 2.5 cm wide have been observed among wild R. strigosus in northwest Canada and southeast Alaska but no written reports have been published on these types (H.K. Hall, pers. comm.). Thin drupelet walls of fruit are common in both cultivated raspberries and wild raspberry species, making fruit from some cultivars and wild types prone to collapse when stacked in a clamshell several layers deep, and very easy to crush. Nevertheless, certain wild species, such as R. pileatus, have compact fruit with a small internal cavity and strong resilience and resistance to compaction (Fig. 7). R. pileatus also has very good berry integrity due to strong drupelet coherence and hairiness. This is a trait of potential value in breeding new fresh market cultivars that do not crumble, especially when picked early for extended shelf life. The extreme hairiness of R. pileatus over the fruit is not displayed in progenies of crosses with red raspberry, but there appears to be increased hairs holding drupelets together and improving coherence. Fruit texture is soft in many wild raspberry species, but very firm species offer good prospects for breeding firmness into cultivated types, similar to the use of ‘Cumberland’ (R. occidentalis) (Fig. 8), which was used as a source of firmness for many cultivars in the EMR and SCRI raspberry breeding programs. Considerable variation in the ease of detachment is also seen in wild raspberry species, with some species, such as R. palmatus, being very

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

Fig. 7. Rubus pileatus, a very hirsute Asiatic raspberry. (photo by SCRI).

Fig. 8. ‘Cumberland’ black raspberry (Hedrick 1925).

57

58

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

difficult to remove (H.K. Hall, pers. observ.). Other species detach very easily and may spontaneously fall off when reaching full ripeness (E. Keep, pers. comm.). Ease of detachment may vary widely within species as well. Populations utilizing R. strigosus segregate for ease of detachment. Many genotypes display strong adherence until fully ripe; these include some cultivars of R. idaeus, such as ‘Titan’ (Plate 3D) (C. Weber, pers. observ.). Cultivated raspberries are very susceptible to cane and fruit Botrytis infection and to other diseases. Susceptibility to disease is also common among wild raspberry species, but some species, such as R. pileatus have significant resistance to Botrytis. These could be used to introgress resistance into the cultivated types. Significant leaf and cane disease resistance is also seen in some species. Flavor and aroma of raspberry species is highly variable with a range extending from ‘‘inedible’’ to ‘‘delicious.’’ With the demand for highquality fruit in the fresh market, the use of wild types such as R. deliciosa and R. niveus as sources of high aroma and flavor will become important for the future of the crop. Considerable variation exists among raspberry species in time of bud break, flowering, interval from flowering to ripening, and time of fruit ripeness. R. coreanus accessions have been described that are very early flowering and fruiting (Jennings 1988). Even late-fruiting types, such as R. niveus, can give rise to early-fruiting types through transgressive segregation (Hall, pers. observ.). R. spectabilis has been a source of earliness for both floricane and primocane fruiting types (Keep 1984b). Very little of the available diversity in raspberry species has been explored, and few accessions from them used in raspberry breeding. Much Idaeobatus germplasm is yet to be evaluated and used in breeding to capture diverse traits that are seen among the wild species. There is also at least as much unseen genetic variability in these species that can only be revealed by crossing them with cultivated types, growing out F1 seedlings and using them for selfing, back crossing, and inbreeding. 4. Traditional Uses from the Wild. Wild raspberries have been gathered from before the time of written history, and the presence of seed in early sites of human habitation shows the fondness of the fruit for fresh consumption (Finn et al. 2002). Even to the present date, this practice continues in areas where wild raspberries are plentiful and productive, as in Northeast China, where wild R. crataegifolius is gathered and sold commercially (H.K. Hall, pers. observ.) (Fig. 9). Raspberries have also been used as a decoction for medicinal purposes.

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

59

Fig. 9. Rubus crataegifolius: (A) Harvested from the wild in China. (photo by H.K. Hall); (B) Fruits in a market in Harbin. (photo by J. Postman).

Even now raspberry juice is used as a herbal remedy (Roach 1985), as an additive to water for birds to reduce intestinal infections, and as a supplement for horses and pigs to reduce problems with stomach infections (Herbal remedies using raspberry 2003). Raspberry leaf tea has long been known as a muscle relaxant, especially for females at the time of menstruation and during childbirth (Ryan et al. 2001); similar activity is reported in animals. Raspberries have also traditionally been used as a tincture, made by steeping raspberry fruit in wine vinegar, straining, boiling, skimming, and bottling. This product has been used to treat fevers, arthritis, and gout (Caughlan 2001). Raspberries have also been used extensively for home preserves, canned, processed as jams or jellies, or used to make juices, for winemaking, and for pies and in pastries, snack bars, and tarts. C History of Improvement 1. Domestication. A range of raspberry species have entered cultivation in different parts of the world, but Rubus idaeus L. is the main domesticated type. Modern-day cultivars are derived mainly from the European red raspberry (R. idaeus subsp. vulgatus) and the North American red raspberry (R. idaeus subsp. strigosus), referred to as R. idaeus and R. strigosus, respectively, in this review. Cultivated R. idaeus differs significantly from original wild types and is most improved and cultivated among raspberry species. However, the entire improved raspberry germplasm pool is based on very few accessions of R. idaeus and R. strigosus. This was examined in detail by Dale et al. (1993), who determined the diversity of 137 cultivars of known pedigrees released between 1960 and 1993. These were derived from 50 founding clones, of which half are represented only once or twice among the 137 descendants. In the remainder, 2 species were

60

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

used for crossing and may have made no genetic contribution. Also there were 3 pairs of parent and offspring, reducing the total number of founding clones for the majority of raspberry cultivars to just 20. Among these 20 clones, ‘Hudson River Antwerp’ was in the background of 110 of the cultivars, ‘Lloyd George’ of 108, and ‘English Globe’ and ‘Highland Hardy’ of 90 (through ‘Marlboro’) For this review, a raspberry pedigree database with almost 6,000 entries was examined to determine how many of the cultivars listed in Hedrick’s Small Fruits of New York (1925) were recorded as being part of the pedigree of cultivars developed since that time (H.K. Hall, pers. observ.). This database contains pedigrees of most of the world’s raspberry cultivars, plus significant numbers of selections from several major international raspberry breeding programs. The total number of cultivars from The Small Fruits of New York represented in the database and used in breeding was 25; 12 were cultivars developed by private or public breeders, and the remainder represented unique accessions of either R. idaeus or R. strigosus. The 25 cultivars were used 204 times in breeding. Among them, ‘Lloyd George’ (Plate 2C) was used more than 25% of the time; ‘Latham’ (Plate 3F), ‘Cuthbert’ (Plate 2B), and ‘Newman’ (Fig. 10) combined for a further 35%; and ‘Viking’, ‘Ranere’, ‘June’, and ‘Herbert’ combined for an additional 15%. In total, over 75% of the genetic input for modern cultivars from this material was derived from only 8 cultivars. The remaining almost 25% brought the total of founding parents up to at most 25 accessions from the wild incorporated prior to 1925. These were 12 accessions of R. idaeus, 11 of R. strigosus, 2 of R. occidentalis, 1 of R. innominatus. The remaining accession was an unknown species from China. In total, more than 400 clones were identified in Hedrick’s 1925 review. Many of these were generated through the actions of humans, either by deliberate crossing or through chance seedlings associated with plantings of improved germplasm from either North America or Europe. Eighty-three of these were listed with at least one known or assumed parent. Nevertheless, almost all of this diversity has been lost to modern-day breeders. Since 1925, the larger raspberry breeding programs in Europe and North America have introduced new germplasm from R. idaeus and from R. strigosus numerous times. Only a small number of new accessions have been successfully incorporated in breeding programs, in spite of many wild populations being grown (Haskell 1960b; Jennings 1963b; Keep 1972; Misˇic´ and Tesovic 1973; Øydvin 1970; Rousi 1965; Rozonova 1939a ). In North America, similar assessments of seedling populations have been made at Prince George in British

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

61

Fig. 10. ‘Newman’ red raspberry (Hedrick 1925).

Columbia (Van Adrichem 1972). Further efforts to introgress new genetics from R. strigosus have been made in the Agriculture and AgriFood Canada’s (AAFC’s) Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre in the British Columbia (PARC-BC), Cornell University (NY), and Oregon (ORUS) programs (Kempler and Daubeny 2008; C. Weber pers. observ.). There the use of R. strigosus has primarily been through selection for various traits and introgression of these into material better suited for commercial production. Much more diversity is available for breeding use, but lack of resources in most programs limits its utilization from being done systematically on a significant scale (Daubeny 1997b). In the process of domestication of the red raspberry, germplasm from both R. idaeus and R. strigosus has been important. A number of traits have been assembled in modern-day cultivars that occur independently and sometimes infrequently in the wild. Traits of primary importance

62

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

include self-fertility; resistance to some diseases, especially viruses; large fruit size; strong upright growth; and reduced numbers of new canes. These attributes are essential in modern raspberry cultivars, enabling the plants to grow in a manageable fashion, to produce high yields, and to survive for an extended period. Red raspberry was initially brought into cultivation in Europe using R. idaeus–derived clones. These were planted in North America after the European settlement (Jennings 1988). Local R. strigosus selections proved superior in some traits, especially in climatic adaptation and resistance to disease. During the 19th century, a wide range of raspberry cultivars on each side of the Atlantic were developed using both subspecies. Political boundaries also affected the domestication and development of the raspberry, especially in the isolation of eastern Europe from western Europe and North America in most of the 20th century. Only the earliest improved cultivars using germplasm from both sides of the Atlantic were available in eastern Europe, and most of the cultivars developed in the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) and allied countries have not had the benefit of access to many of the more recent cultivars developed in the West. Nevertheless, there have been very large breeding efforts in eastern Europe, using early western germplasm from Europe and North America, local selections and cultivars, and limited new introductions of EMR and SCRI germplasm, which have not been sufficiently winter hardy for climatic conditions in most of the former USSR. However, cultivars have been produced that are able to withstand local climatic conditions. New cultivars have helped invigorate this industry, which still produces almost half of the world’s raspberries. Trials of new cultivars from the Russian Federation are under way in China but not yet in western countries, as far as authors of this review have been able to determine. Improved plant traits among domesticated red raspberries include vigorous upright growth, reduced cane number, resistance to diseases, good lateral attachment, high fruit number per lateral, adaptation to specific environmental conditions, and enhancement of the primocane fruiting trait found only with weak expression in the wild. Fruiting has been improved with the selection of self-fertile types with large fruit size, improved firmness, enhanced flavor and color, high yield, and ease of harvest. Modern-day plant breeding continues the process of domestication of the red raspberry, improving the cultivated types to make them more appreciated by the consumer and profitable for the grower. Separate domestication events have taken place with other raspberry species in Europe, Asia, and North America, including Rubus arcticus L., R. crataegifolius, R. coreanus, and R. occidentalis. In Northern

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

63

Europe, efforts have been made to domesticate the Arctic raspberry, R. arcticus, especially through the efforts of researchers at the North Savo Agricultural Experiment Station at Maaninka in Finland (Holloway 1982). Problems encountered with this species include low productivity, small fruit size, extended fruiting season, self-infertility, and strong adherence of fruit to the receptacle, making harvest difficult. Attempts have been made to cross R. arcticus with the red raspberry, but the hybrid retained has not been successfully backcrossed to R. arcticus to introgress desirable traits. Backcrosses to R. idaeus have taken generations to restore economic traits by which time the distinctive flavor of R. arcticus was almost completely lost (Holloway 1982). In Sweden, attempts to produce an improved arctic raspberry clone have utilized the Alaskan species R. stellarcticus in crosses with R. arcticus to develop improved cultivars with large flavorful fruit (Larsson 1980). Nevertheless, these new cultivars remain self-sterile and have to be picked by cutting the calyx. There remains much to be achieved in completing the domestication of this crop to make it better suited for commercial production. In North America, the black raspberry, R. occidentalis, has been domesticated and named cultivars were bred at the New York Agricultural Experiment Station in Geneva from selections of wild plants throughout the eastern United States. For the past 100 years, fruit have been hand harvested for fresh market and processing; more recently they have been harvested by machine (Funt 2002). As with the other minor raspberry species, the black raspberry has only taken the first steps toward domestication. Commercial cultivars have severe virus problems, root rot, arching growth habit, very spiny canes, and small fruit size. Little diversity has been found in existing cultivars, but further traits for improvement of black raspberries can be found in wild R. occidentalis and in R. leucodermis, the western black raspberry species. The USDA has begun a black raspberry breeding program in Corvallis, Oregon (Fig. 11). A diverse range of Asiatic black raspberry species exists. However, thus far they have not yet been successfully crossed with R. occidentalis cultivars to add diversity for black raspberry cultivar development. R. coreanus has been successfully used in crosses with red raspberry in the EMR program, and useful traits have been introgressed into new red raspberry cultivars. In Asia, many raspberry types are gathered from the wild but few attempts have been made to bring any of these species into cultivation. R. crataegifolius and R. coreanus are the exceptions with several cultivars being released for growers in Korea (Hong et al. 1986; Kim et al. 2006). R. crataegifolius cultivars include ‘Jingu Juegal’ and ‘Jingu

64

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

Fig. 11. Chad Finn, USDA plant geneticist and Rubus breeder, evaluates black raspberry plants. (photo by S. Ausmus).

Whangal’. These cultivars are not widely grown but occupy a small part of raspberry production in this region. In black raspberry (R. occidentalis), a thriving industry has developed in South Korea, with over 4,500-tonne (t) production per year, mainly for winemaking. R. coreanus cultivars have been developed and are being commercialized, also for winemaking (Han et al. 2006; Kim et al. 2002, 2005). R. crataegifolius, R. coreanus, R. innomatus, R. niveus, and other Asiatic species have been widely used in attempts to improve the red raspberry but only as donors for specific traits. Attempts have also been made to domesticate R. parvifolius in the United States as a raspberry type suitable for high-temperature and lowchill conditions, but no commercial or even home gardener cultivars have been released and no industry developed. As with the other Asiatic species, R. parvifolius has been used in breeding to improve the red raspberry, and it has played an important part in the development of the cultivars ‘Dormanred’, ‘Mandarin’ and ‘Southland’ adapted to conditions in southeastern United States. It has been used to impart low-chill adaptation in the HRNZ New Zealand program. R. parvifolius also has been valuable as a source of resistance to fluctuating winter temperatures in the BC1 and BC2 generations (Ballington and Fernandez 2008). 2. Floricane Fruiting. The floricane fruiting trait is the normal means of fruit production for raspberry types, with fruit produced on laterals that develop in the second year after a first year of vegetative growth.

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

65

Most raspberry species devote their reproductive efforts into producing fruit on laterals from second-year canes. The exceptions to this are primocane fruiting species. Of those, R. arcticus has an annual reproductive cycle and R. ellipticus is fully perennial. At present, primocane-fruiting red raspberry types are the only nonfloricane fruiting raspberries cultivated commercially, but efforts are under way to produce primocane-fruiting black raspberries for future commercial production (P. Tallman, pers. comm.). 3. Primocane Fruiting. The primocane-fruiting trait in raspberries occurs naturally in wild R. idaeus, R. strigosus, and R. occidentalis, but the natural expression of this character is limited to a small amount of fruit at the cane tips, often late in the autumn. The primocanefruiting trait also occurs in: cold-climate herbaceous species, including R. arcticus L., R. chamaemorus L., and R. saxatilis L.; in warm-climate species R. illecebrosus Focke; in biennial types; and also in the perennial-caned species R. odoratus L. (Keep 1961). Among wild raspberries and Rubus species expressing the primocane-fruiting trait, fruit size is often small, fruiting nodes are few, branching and lateral formation is limited, and fruit number per lateral or fruiting node is few (Keep 1988). Despite the low yield and poor quality of wild primocanefruiting types, they have been cultivated in European and North American gardens for over 200 years (Mawe and Abercrombie 1778; McMahon 1806). From the earliest times of the domestication of the red raspberry, plants producing some primocane fruit were noted, and early breeders made attempts to enhance this trait. A significant advance was made when varieties with primocane-fruiting expression from the European red raspberry, R. idaeus (‘Lloyd George’) and the North American red raspberry R. strigosus (‘Ranere’ and the numbered selections NY 21289, NY 20903 and NY 20990) were interbred, resulting in the cultivars ‘Marcy’, ‘Indian Summer’, ‘September’ and ‘Zeva Herbsternte’, followed in later generations with ‘Fallred’ and ‘Heritage’ (Plate 3B) (Keep 1988). Keys for the potential success of primocane-fruiting raspberries are good expression of yield components and excellent fruit quality. Lewis (1941) and Haskell (1960a) published theories on simple inheritance of a gene for primocane fruiting, but other studies have shown that inheritance is a complex mechanism (Keep 1988; Slate and Watson 1964; Waldo and Darrow 1941). Keep (1961, 1988) emphasized that the inheritance of primocane fruiting in raspberries was due to the interaction of both genetic and environmental factors. The realization of yield potential of primocane-fruiting raspberries

66

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

depends on the interaction of additive factors for season (vigor, maturity, and earliness) with the local environmental conditions (climate, day-length, nutrition, and water availability) (Keep 1988). Yield potential is determined by fruit size and number, fruit number per cane being dependant on bearing surface or amount of branching and lateral formation on canes combined with cane number per plant (Keep 1988). Significant advances in earliness and in yield potential over the cultivars derived from R. idaeus and R. strigosus have been achieved by breeders at EMR with the introgression of earliness into primocane-fruiting types from R. arcticus, R. odoratus, and R. spectabilis (Keep 1988; Knight 1991). Further progress in the development of primocane-fruiting raspberries has been achieved with the improvement of fruit quality by introgressing quality from floricane-fruiting types, especially through the work of Derek Jennings at SCRI and Medway Fruits (Kent, England) (Jennings 2002). The initial cross making this sort of combination was ‘Glen Moy’  ‘Autumn Bliss’. Large numbers of seedlings from this cross were grown in the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States, leading to the cultivars ‘Aspiring’, ‘Dinkum,’ and ‘Terri Louise’ and the advanced selections A83-31-B5 from Australia and GEO-1 (parent of ‘Caroline’) from the United States. The combination ‘Comox’ ‘Autumn Bliss’ also produced the high-quality cultivar ‘Bogong’ in Australia. In addition the new cultivars ‘Erika’ and ‘Sugana’ were produced from the cross ‘Tulameen’  ‘Autumn Bliss’. Further crosses were done between the high-quality floricane-fruiting raspberries ‘Glen Lyon’ and the selection SCRI 8216B6 with primocane cultivars and advanced selections from the EMR program to produce advanced selections and cultivars in the Medway Fruits program (Jennings 2002). In the United States, advanced selections and cultivars from EMR, SCRI, and Medway Fruits were crossed with advanced selections in the Maryland program and the DSA program, giving rise to further levels of breeding improvement and advances in yield and quality. D. World Industry The raspberry industry is expanding rapidly around the world, especially in the fresh market and in production for processing in third world countries, where labor is cheap for hand harvest production. Principal driving factors for the recent expansion include:  Sales to new markets around the world in regions where raspberries have not been traditionally grown

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

67

 Improved returns to growers through improved fruit quality and improved growing environmental conditions making the crop dependable  Improved fruit quality, leading to sales of a more appealing product to consumers  Reduced losses by retailers due to the effects of molds and the perishable nature of the crop; thus retailers are keen to stock more raspberries and present more for sale  Recognition of raspberries as a healthy component of diet and the use of raspberries in healthy foods, in drinks such as Bouvrage, and in mineral and health-promoting products such as Maximol (Anewlife 2007; Ella-Drinks 2007). It is difficult to estimate area and production around the world, and no reliable source provides accurate data (Strik 2007). The FAO data, which could give an accurate perspective on this, is clouded through the incorporation of production figures on other berries, which, for example, gives production in Vietnam, where there is no raspberry industry, of over 100,000 t. An estimated area of 71,250 ha is cultivated, and annual production is estimated at around 615,000 t (wild plants harvested not included, except from the Russian Federation) (Table 1). Table 1. World production of raspberries, 2005–2007. Region Russian Federation Serbia and Montenegro USAZ Poland Chile Ukraine Germany Hungary China and KoreaY Canada France England-Scotland Romania Bulgaria Others World

Production (t)

Area (ha)

176,000 90,000 84,000 65,000 64,000 27,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 15,000 8,000 8,000 4,500 3,000 5,000 602,500

15,000 10,500 7,000 13,000 10,500 5,000 2,500 3,200 3,200 2,800 1,000 1,300 250 200 1,300 71,250

Source: Coburn 2007; FAO 2007; IFEPoland 2007. Black raspberries comprise just over 2% of this total. Y Black raspberries comprise almost 25% of this total, entirely in Korea (Lee Dong Hee, pers. commun.). Z

68

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

These figures are a compilation of FAO data, personal information, and communications and data from the Oregon Raspberry and Blackberry Commission. As production varies each year according to climatic conditions, the highest yield for each region over the years 2005 to 2007 has been used in an attempt to eliminate weather-based variation in production. 1. North America. In North America, raspberry production has moved from predominant production for processing to a significant fresh market production base. Process production is almost entirely machine harvested and is based in Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia, with Washington being the largest producer. The main cultivar for processing is ‘Meeker’, with most of the plantings in the Pacific Northwest still using this cultivar, 40 years after its release in 1967 and nearly 60 years after the cross was done in 1950. ‘Meeker’ has retained its position as the leading process cultivar in this region not only because of its fruit size, flavor and processing character, root rot resistance, and adaptation to this climate but because of the maintenance of high health propagation stocks and a very effective certification program. ‘Meeker’ is susceptible to raspberry bushy dwarf virus (RBDV). Recent plantings in this region are being infected and requiring replacement after as little as five years. In addition, ‘Meeker’ root rot resistance is no longer sufficient to keep plantings root-rot free in the Pacific Northwest, likely through a combination of plantings on poorer soils and the presence of more virulent pathotypes of the disease. Over 60% of the total production is for fresh market with most of this production based in California. (In 2006, the Californian production was 63% of the total and almost all was sold in the fresh market.) The leading producer of fresh market raspberries in North America is DSA, with up to 80% of the market. Their first dual-cropping raspberries were developed by Earl Goldsmith and Joseph Reiter in 1937. Commercial production of ‘Stonehurst’ and ‘Sweetbriar’ was initiated by Sweetbriar’s when plants were patented in 1979 (Daubeny 1991; Reiter 1979b). The Sweetbriar Company has now been amalgamated with DSA and fruit is sold under the Driscoll’s label. Current cultivars have been developed from interbreeding Sweetbriar cultivars and by introgressing traits from the world’s leading raspberries into the unique DSA germplasm. Production for fresh market has expanded in recent years to Southern California, Mexico, and Guatemala, using low-chill cultivars and taking advantage of higher-altitude production regions in Mexico and Guatemala. These regions are likely to be expanded in the future to

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

69

provide an off-season supply for the rest of North America, especially if transportation and hygiene issues are resolved in Mexico and Guatemala. In contrast to the expansion of large company production, there is a resurgence of farmers’ markets in North America, which will need to be serviced with the development of new cultivars for the future. 2. Australasia. Australia and New Zealand have grown raspberries for local consumption and for export since the 19th century. Shipments for export to the United Kingdom were sent preserved by sulfur dioxide by sailing ship prior to the advent of steamships. Frozen fruit also were shipped prior to the turn of the 20th century. Production of raspberries for processing in both Australia and New Zealand was significant through the 20th century, but current production in both countries is focused on the fresh market. Process production has diminished significantly; total production is approximately 800 t. 3. China and East Asia. A small raspberry production industry has been present in China for almost 100 years, centred in the northeastern province of Heilongjiang. Raspberries were initially imported with Russian construction engineers when they came to assist the Chinese with the development of a railway infrastructure in the 1920s (Yang 2002). In the 1970s, raspberries became a viable commercial crop, and production increased significantly in the rural area around Shangzhi city. Production is between 6,000 and 20,000 t. Both smaller producers and larger companies are gearing up for increased production of raspberries in China, although there needs to be significant improvements in cultivars grown both for environmental adaptation and for suitability to market niches targeted by producers. Significant capital investment is needed to carry out the expansion desired by some of the larger producers (H.K. Hall, pers. observ.). Raspberries are also grown and produced in Korea, with locally developed cultivars of red raspberry (R. crataegifolius) and black raspberry (R. coreanus) being grown and consumed in addition to cultivars of R. idaeus and R. occidentalis from which traditional cultivars of red and black raspberry have been developed. Production of red raspberries is low but black raspberry production is over 4500 t. Demand for both red and black raspberries is increasing, as is production and market value. Consumption is also increasing in Japan; this country promises to become a significant market for the future. 4. Russian Federation and the Ukraine. Russia has a long history of raspberry production, and it remains the world’s largest producer,

70

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

although some of the production is still harvested from the wild. Around 176,000 t are produced annually in the Russian Federation and up to 27,000 t in the Ukraine. Little information is available in the West about production and cultivars grown in these areas, but recent information available on the Internet and in publications by Kichina and Kazakov show exciting new cultivar developments in fruit size, production, and adaptive range, especially into very cold locations and north into high latitudes (Kazakov 2006; Kichina 2004, 2005a). 5. Europe. The largest traditional producers in western Europe are Germany, France, and the United Kingdom. Germany has historically been the largest, currently producing about 20,000 t, compared with France and the United Kingdom with about 8,000 t each. In the United Kingdom, historical production has been for the fresh market in England and the process market in Scotland. Process production has significantly declined in recent years and fresh market production in Scotland has risen dramatically (Jennings et. al. 2008). Around 80% of fresh market production in the United Kingdom is in tunnels or under glass, to reduce the risk of weather-related drops in quality or losses due to spoilage. Fresh-market sales of raspberries have significantly increased there in recent years, and high-quality fruit is now found in the market year round, from local or external sources. Cultivars grown in the United Kingdom are locally produced, from the PARC-BC raspberry breeding program or from the DSA breeding program in California. Cultivars ‘Glen Ample’ and ‘Tulameen’ (Plates 2G and 6C) dominate U. K. raspberry production, and production of ‘Octavia’ is increasing to become the third significant cultivar (Knight and Ferna´ndez Ferna´ndez 2008a). Further cultivars produced in minor quantities are ‘Autumn Bliss’, DSA cultivars, ‘Himbo Top’, ‘Joan Squire’, ‘Polana’, and ‘Polka’. In France, there has been a tradition of growing cultivars such as ‘Rose de Cote d’Or’, with very strong flavor and aroma, which is highly favored by culinary and winemaking specialists. However, this cultivar and other local varieties have now been mostly replaced by cultivars from major breeding programs in the United Kingdom or United States, with ‘Meeker’ being the major cultivar produced at the present time. In Germany, in spite of having the largest production in western Europe, production is largely based around old cultivars or cultivars imported to the country. Germany has also become a major importer of raspberries for fresh sales and for processing. 6. Eastern Europe. Until recently, Eastern European countries were outside of the European Community (EC) and they were able to rely on

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

71

cheaper local labor, subsidies, and production incentives to bolster production of cheap raspberries for sales to the EC. However, recently Poland (65,000 t), Hungary (10,000 t), Romania (4,500 t), and Bulgaria (3,000 t) have joined the EC. It remains unclear how long prices will be reduced for raspberry production from these new EC states and whether their production will grow or diminish under the new political structure. The largest and only remaining producer in Eastern Europe outside the EC is Serbia (90,000 t) with production still mostly on holdings of 2 ha or less. When sanctions were placed on Serbia after the Kosovo war, production dropped significantly, although channels for sale of much of the fruit were found through neighboring countries. Since the relaxation of sanctions, production has increased and is mostly sold as frozen fruit to the EC and other parts of the world. 7. Southern Europe. Spain, Portugal, and southern Italy were not able to grow raspberries commercially until recently, due to poor adaptation of cultivars. However, in recent years, two changes have made raspberry production possible and profitable in these areas. First, growers have adopted cultural methods that utilize natural chill from other cooler locations to vernalize canes for production in these warm climate locations or artificial chill has been applied to canes grown in these areas. Both methods use long canes that have been cool-stored until planting for producing high-density, short-lived plantations, usually under tunnels for producing high-value crops targeting the out-of-season markets farther north. Spanish growers have successfully manipulated ‘Glen Lyon’ using this system since the 1990s. New ‘Glen Lyon’ fields are planted every three weeks by growers to give a continuous ongoing harvest. When harvest is complete in each field, new canes are dug and cool-stored for 50 days before replanting (D.L. Jennings, pers. comm.). Second, new primocane-fruiting cultivars like ’Joan Squire’ can be manipulated for production in Southern Europe for the same high-value, out-of-season markets. When canes are cut back to ten nodes fruiting occurs on replacement canes after fifteen weeks, or twenty weeks when cut back to the ground. 8. Africa. Most of Africa is too hot for raspberry production, and until recently the only limited production has been in South Africa. More recently, production has been initiated in Morocco, Algeria, and Kenya, using the same cultivars and techniques as used in southern Europe.

72

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

9. South America. Since the 1970s, raspberry production in Chile has grown rapidly. By 2007, Chilean raspberry production was fourth in the world after the Russian Federation, Serbia and Montenegro, and the United States, with an annual production of around 64,000 t. This has been made possible by cheap labor, through the development of effective trade relations with the United States and Europe, and through effective marketing. Raspberry growing in Chile is very productive, and plants appear very well adapted to the local conditions. Around 80% of the production is of ‘Heritage’. Other primocane-fruiting cultivars such as ‘Autumn Bliss’ appear healthy and vigorous after 12 years of production. In Chile, there are large areas that appear well suited for raspberry production. With the development of productive, locally adapted cultivars, production there has the potential to increase so that Chile becomes the world’s leading producer. Raspberries are also produced in Argentina, but the developments in Chile far outstrip those in Argentina. E. Uses Many traditional uses of red raspberries continue today, and in some locations older uses of fresh raspberry fruit are being revived, especially for medicinal use, where scientific studies are confirming traditional health-giving properties. Today fresh raspberries are increasing in popularity, where they are consumed as a snack, as a dessert, sometimes with sugar and dairy products (cream, ice cream, yogurt, etc.), and with increasing frequency as a health-giving addition to breakfast. Fresh raspberries are also used as a garnish on bakery products and in fruit salads. Many other uses are found for fresh raspberries, but these are through processing and are covered under process raspberries, even though in most cases the use of fresh fruit would be better and more nutritious. Many raspberries are stored as a frozen product before their ultimate use in processing. Preservation as frozen products is common as individually quick frozen (IQF), block frozen pulp, or concentrate. Pulp is often screened before concentration. Screened pulp has the solids removed before being clarified for juice or juice concentrate. Canning continues to be practiced, it is rapidly diminishing as a source for industrial or processing use. Drying, by heating, low-pressure evaporation, or freeze drying, is also popular as a first step from fresh harvest, before shipping and use for processing. Drying is also used to make raspberry fruit leather or multifruit leather for snack food sales.

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

73

Preserving of fruit pulp under sulfur dioxide as used in the 19th and early 20th centuries is now almost gone. Wherever raspberries are used for processing, convenience is an increasingly important factor for processors who are becoming less interested in buying block frozen packs, pails, or drums of fruit for use in their factories, even when the price is lower. For this reason IQF fruit is becoming much more popular as the preferred source of process raspberries for factory use. IQF fruit can be defrosted quickly, used with less waste, and results in a higher-quality product. Use in the bakery trade, especially in smaller businesses, has increased through the availability of IQF fruit. Bakery products using raspberries include pies, tarts, fruit rolls, biscuits, and pastries. Raspberries are also used as juice to make flavored milk and as pulp, prepared cooked purees with sugar, and/or as whole fruits in combination with dairy products to make yogurt, cheesecake, and ice cream. IQF raspberries are also used in ‘‘ice cream machines’’ to make real-fruit ice cream by grinding frozen berries with plain or vanilla ice cream. IQF raspberries are also used to make sorbets for a nondairy, ice fruit dessert. Raspberry concentrate, juice, and freeze-dried fruit are used as components of healthful breakfast cereals, especially in Muesli and other products, such as Fruity Bix in Australia and New Zealand (Sanitarium Health Food Company 2007). Raspberries are also processed by cooking with sugar to make jam and, when the seed is removed, raspberry jelly. Similar processed products are made for diabetics and those on sugar-free or lower carbohydrate diets. Jams and jellies are also made without cooking and preserved for storage by pasteurization or freezing. Raspberries are used in health products such as Maximol (Anewlife 2007) and as flavoring for medicines to make them palatable for children. They also are used for intestinal health and reduction of stomach infections caused by bacteria. In Australia, raspberry juice is added to water supplies of livestock or birds to reduce or eliminate stomach infections. F. Breeding Objectives Breeding objectives for new raspberry cultivars are focused on morphological traits (uprightness, spinelessness, and cane quality), yield, fruit quality, pest and disease resistance, and environmental adaptation (Daubeny 1996; Jennings 1988; Ourecky 1975a). The relative importance of each of these objectives within a breeding program is tied closely to the nature of the local industry, the markets (fresh for pick

74

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

your own or local sales, fresh for shipping and marketing some distance from the production region, processed for jams and concentrate, juice, winemaking etc.), the local or market traditions, and the restrictions of the local environment, including pests and diseases. In the last 30 years, raspberry production in the western world has changed significantly, from largely processed fruit to a high proportion of fresh-market sales. Process production in the North American traditional production region of the Pacific Northwest has moved from hand to mechanized harvest. In Europe, the Scottish industry made an attempt to do likewise, but this was inhibited by the lack of an economic cultivar/machine combination. Western producers have also come under pressure from hand harvest, processing quality production in South America and in Eastern Europe, where labor costs are low and small family holdings are the most important producers for the local industries. The processed raspberry crop in Scotland has dropped significantly, and 80% of the crop is now produced for the fresh market. China also is poised to make a significant impact as a producer and exporter for markets in the western world. The trend toward fresh-market production resulted from improvements in fruit quality, management, production techniques, quality control, cool chain and handling procedures, and increased sales to consumers through supermarket chains. The move to supermarket sales also has affected the growing conditions and breeding objectives, as the supermarkets insist on having high-quality fresh raspberries available throughout the year. Production has moved to tunnels in Europe and the Americas, and the production region has extended into the subtropics and tropical climatic zones, both of which require new adaptation and quality traits for the production of high-quality fruit. In North America, many of the small producers of raspberries for fresh market sales have disappeared. Sales from large companies have taken their place, and with improvement in quality and storage life, the fresh-market raspberry sector has grown significantly. Large companies producing fruit for this market have moved to breeding and growing their own cultivars. At the same time, inputs to public breeding programs have decreased. In the United Kingdom, many growers have moved to become part of a large grower cooperative, K.G. Fruits/Berry Growers, which has both accessed new cultivars and germplasm from North America and started the development of its own new cultivars in partnership with the public breeding program at EMR. Larger companies have also resorted to sourcing fruit from warmer climates and opposite season production regions in the southern hemisphere.

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

75

Breeding objectives for the North American fresh market have taken on a DSA color and flavor preference, as they have the major share in the marketplace. Color is a light orange-red that does not significantly darken during storage and flavor is sweet, with low acidity and low aromatics. DSA raspberry fruit also has good skin strength, especially at the fruit tip, and moderately firm internal texture. Preferred fruit size is small-medium, as the clamshells for marketing only hold a small quantity of fruit.

II. GERMPLASM RESOURCES, EXPLORATION, AND MAINTENANCE A. Acquisition of New Germplasm By 1937, Darrow realized that while improvements in raspberry had been significant, more could yet be accomplished. Some of the qualities now found separately, that may be combined in raspberries of the future are the very large fruit size of European varieties and newer American productions, immense fruit clusters, great productiveness, firmness, vigor, and resistance to diseases. But there is also a large reservoir of germplasm hardly yet touched by raspberry breeders, in the wild species of Asia and elsewhere, some of which resemble the grape, hawthorn, bamboo, maple, and apple in their leaf forms and vary from low and soft-stemmed plants to plants with stems 3 inches thick and 14 feet high.

Darrow (1937) reported that more than 67 Rubus species from Europe, Asia, North America, and South America had been evaluated for breeding and improvement of raspberries and blackberries. Large collections of Rubus were made by L.H. Bailey and assembled in New York in the first half of the 1900s (Hedrick 1925), but these collections were for pressed voucher specimens to be kept in herbaria rather than as living examples of distributable plant material at a gene bank. Finn and Knight (2002) observed that most raspberry breeding programs evaluate and incorporate new Rubus species germplasm. In Europe, at least 16 species have been evaluated and used as sources of new traits. In North America, at least 58 species have been evaluated and applied in breeding. The EMR program has more frequently incorporated new genes from European species rather than other international species (Jennings 1988; Knight 1993), although at times a range of Asiatic species have been used. The USDA-ARS small fruit

76

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

programs in Oregon and Maryland, and state and regional programs in North Carolina, at Puyallup, Washington (WSU), and Abbotsford, British Columbia (PARC-BC) have more recently focused on Asian species as parents (Finn and Knight 2002; Finn et al. 1999, 2001a, 2002). The U.S. national Rubus gene bank was established at Corvallis, Oregon, in 1981. During the past 27 years, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has sponsored roughly 30 plant-collecting expeditions for small fruits in which at least some Rubus accessions have been obtained (Table 2). However, Rubus continues to be in need of systematic collection, partly because of the great diversity of the genus—these expeditions have only scratched the surface of Rubus species diversity—and partly because successful propagation of wild Rubus has proven difficult. In most of these expeditions, seed lots were obtained. Frequently, in the wild, only a few fruit may be available at the time that collectors were present. Fruit may not be ripe, particularly if collectors were targeting other small fruit genera, such as Fragaria. Unripe fruit usually provide only immature or unfilled seed with low viability. If fruits were absent, clonal propagules may have been collected, but propagation success has been limited. As a result, representatives of only about 56% of wild-collected Rubus now remains alive at the Corvallis gene bank. Since 1996, the advent of handheld global positioning system (GPS) units has permitted specific locality information to be obtained from collection sites. This information will enabled easier re-collection of material when initial establishment of wild material has been unsuccessful. It promises to be a very useful tool for the future. Red, black, and purple raspberries and blackberries are the most economically important cultivated crops derived from the genus Rubus worldwide. However, wherever Rubus is found, species are gathered from the wild and represent an important food and monetary source as a local crop for native peoples. Some examples are: Mora de Castilla (R. glaucus) of Andean South America; R. crataegifolius of northeastern Asia; the Arctic raspberries (R. stellatus, R. arcticus, and R. stellarcticus) and cloudberry (R. chamaemorus) (Fig. 12) of Scandinavia, Newfoundland, and Alaska; R. sachalinensis in Siberia and Sakhalin Island; and R. strigosus in Alaska. Relative to continued development of raspberries for global use, these four species should be collected for better representation in world gene banks. 1. Rubus strigosus (North America)/R. idaeus (Eurasia). Throughout the native range. These two groups of R. idaeus form the

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

77

Table 2. USDA Clonal Germplasm Repository Rubus germplasm collections.

Expedition leader

Year

Mel Westwood Otto Jahn Mel Westwood National Arboretum staff Maxine Thompson Maxine Thompson Jim Ballington, Jim Luby, and Otto Jahn Robert Skirvin Jim Ballington Mark Widrlechner Maxine Thompson Maxine Thompson Jim Ballington, Maxine Thompson Jim Luby Kim Hummer, Naohiro Naruhashi Scott Cameron Maxine Thompson Wes Messinger, Jim Ballington Chad Finn, Jim Luby Kim Hummer, Cathy Wright Maxine Thompson, Chad Finn, Joseph Postman Nat. Arboretum Staff Kim Hummer, Nick Vorsa

1982 1982 1983 1983 1984 1984

Japan, Korea, Taiwan Oregon Hawaii China Syria Minnesota, Wisconsin

158–181 185–187 399–414 423–430 482–484 495–599

1985 1986 1986 1987 1987 1988

Pacific Northwest USA New Zealand Southeast Midwest USA Colorado, USA Pakistan

643–719 745–776 778–798 840–851 861–871 1052–1079

1990 1991

Ecuador Scotland

1248–1295 1296–1384

1991 1992 1992

Japan Chile Guizhou, China

1417–1429 1568–1579 1621–1716

1995 1995 1996

Bolivia Western US Alaska

1789–1812 1827–1860 1875–1903

1996 1996 2001

NE China Ecuador Primorye, Khabarovsk, Russia Armenia Sakhalin, Russia Hokkaido Republic of Georgia Florida

1911–1934 2063–2096 2142–2157

Joseph Postman Andrey Sabitov Kim Hummer, Thomas Davis Joseph Postman Kim Hummer, Paul Lyrene Kim Hummer, Chad Finn, Michael Dossett

2002 2004 2004 2004 2006 2007

Location

Corvallis inventory numbers

Southeastern and Midwestern US

2165–2177 2238–2252 2256–2286 2302–2305 2335–2338 2357–2418

underpinning of the red raspberry industry. They are distributed throughout northern temperate regions with some notable, southern remnant populations. While extensive but haphazard collections representing North America have recently been assembled

78

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

Fig. 12. Rubus chamaemorus collected from Siberia in 2001. (photo by K. Hummer).

by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada in British Columbia, this species is not well represented from throughout its North American and Eurasian distribution. What sampling has been done has led to the identification of valuable sources of Phytophthora root rot resistance (Kempler and Daubeny 2008). There is special interest in collecting this species from the extremes (wettest, driest, coldest and hottest) of its range. 2. Rubus idaeus (Eurasia) from the former Soviet Union. This is a critical, pressing need. The large Russian collection of R. idaeus is in danger of being lost because of the current economic situation in some of the former Soviet Union states.

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

79

3. Rubus occidentalis. The black raspberry industry, concentrated in Oregon, has relied on wild selections and turn-of-the-20th-century developed cultivars. Three recent collecting trips (Table 2) have obtained new genetic resources of these species. R. leucodermis was collected throughout the Pacific Northwest. R. occidentalis was collected through five southeastern U.S. states of the southern limit of the range and in five states at the midwestern limit of the range. The variability present within these samples is being assessed and may bring about new black raspberry cultivars for commerce. R. occidentalis is worth collecting from much of the adaptive range in North America. Primocane-fruiting black raspberries are being evaluated in several breeding programs throughout the United States (Dossett et al. 2007). 4. Asian Rubus. A major center of origin for Rubus is in China. Flora of China (Lingdi and Boufford 2003) reports to have 208 species, with 139 being endemic. Systematic collections were sponsored by the USDA in 1994 in China’s Guizhou Province and in northeast China in 1996. These collections are being evaluated and potentially valuable germplasm is being incorporated into advanced breeding material. However, no other official U.S. government collecting has been done in China since 2004. To date, the United States and China have not agreed to terms for bilateral collecting agreements as currently required by the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources. Although the United States contracted with India in the early 1990s for collection of Rubus and other temperate fruit and nut crops in the Himalayan hills, no plant material was permitted to leave India. Some collecting has been done in Japan, although the target species for that expedition was Fragaria and the ripe fruit of Rubus was unavailable. R. parvifolius has proven to be a valuable germplasm resource in breeding low-chill- and high-temperatureadapted red raspberries. This species needs to be systematically collected in Asia including Japan and Korea. B. Value of Clonal Germplasm Versus Seed Rubus germplasm can be collected as seed extracted from fruit or as clonal or vegetative propagules. Rubus seed is orthodox, and low seed moisture and low temperature extend storage life (Doijode 2001). Seed provides the opportunity to efficiently represent a broad level of diversity. A second advantage is that seed lots, in some cases, can be approved for shipments accommodating some phytosanitary

80

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

certification regulations where plants cannot be shipped. Species’ genetic material is cheaper to collect and maintain as seed than as clones. Disadvantages of seed storage include the potential for storing of nonviable seed. In addition, the optimal procedures for overcoming seed dormancy and germination procedures for most species have not been determined. While the range of diversity represented by seed is higher, time and effort are needed to select useful clones from seed populations. Most seedlings of clones will be not as ‘‘good’’ (i.e., able to meet qualification standards) as their parents. Care must be taken to maintain the integrity, diversity, and heterozygosity of the germplasm contained in the seed lot by ensuring adequate seed lot size (usually > 30) for regeneration efforts. This may be achieved by crossing individual seedlings instead of using open pollinated seed. Sufficient male and female parents are needed to capture the diversity of the original seed lot. Collection of clonal material frequently has advantages. The specific plant phenology and morphology can be observed. Particularly traits useful in identification, such as those of leaves, flowers, and fruit, can be measured. This provides a ready access for identification based on morphology. Fresh or lyophilized leaves can be obtained for molecular studies or for shipment. Pollen can be gathered from flowers, and seed can be gathered from fruits for distribution or additional genetic resource preservation. Clones provide material for evaluation of descriptive traits and can regenerate seed lots. Alternative genetic resource preservation techniques, such as in vitro culture and cryogenic storage of dormant buds or meristematic tissue, can be obtained. If clones are maintained properly, the precise genotype is preserved. There is no problem with inbreeding depression or genetic drift. Diversity is not lost when the collection is regenerated by vegetative propagation. Data can be collected to gather details on growth, morphology, chemistry, and quality. Clones are readily available for use in germplasm improvement. The viability of the genetic resources is evident. Some of the disadvantages of clones include the need to be correctly identified. Clones should consist of a high-quality vegetative plant material, and the accession must be maintained in high health conditions. Clones can easily become infected by diseases and can be prone to accidental damage, especially when kept in the field. Each cultivar or selection requires testing and, if disease infected, requires cleaning up with subsequent diligent maintenance of the diseasefree clones. Raspberries require considerable maintenance and care

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

81

compared to most other berry crops. Trellising is constantly needed. Thorns of the plants are difficult to work with. In field settings, raspberries produce underground suckers that can ‘‘contaminate’’ neighboring plants; taxonomic expertise is required to differentiate between contaminated clones. C. Germplasm Preservation The challenges of maintaining a gene bank representing global Rubus diversity is a daunting task. The USDA-ARS germplasm resources information network (GRIN) recognizes 415 Rubus species and subspecies, with 195 of these represented in the USDA genebank (USDA 2007). This very widespread genus includes species adapted to many niches and ecosystems from sea level to 4,200 meters and from equatorial to arctic zones. Some Rubus genotypes are armed, gregarious, dominant, and overbearing plants with sprawling to upright habit. Others are delicate, petite, understory or prostrate plants requiring precise pH, drainage, light, heat, and cooling for cultivation. Some thrive on arctic hillsides of scree or rock outcroppings, some in peat and sphagnum bogs, some in the temperate forests, some in deserts, and others in tropical jungles. To preserve Rubus germplasm as living plants, provisions must be made for this diversity. The USDA houses the primary Rubus genetic resource collection (230 are raspberry clones belonging to Rubus idaeus, R. sachalinensis, or R. strigosus) as containerized plants in about 300 m2 aphid-proof screenhouses and 230 m2 of polyacrylamide-glazed greenhouses. Secondary collections are temporarily grown in field plots for evaluation or stored locally or off-site by alternative biotechnologies. These include midterm storage (5–10 years) at 1 to 4 C as tissuecultured plants in a walk-in cooler or long-term storage (decades) in a 30-liter liquid nitrogen tank. Other countries that have Rubus gene banks include Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Hungary, India, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Korea, Netherlands, Norway, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Russian Federation, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom (Bettencourt and Konopka 1989; Diekmann et al. 1994). Intercountry cooperatives that preserve Rubus genetic resources include the European cooperation in the field of scientific and technical research (COST) and the Nordic Genebank. (Euroberry 2007). In addition to clonal germplasm, where preservation of specific genotypes is critical, seeds and pollen are preserved to represent Rubus

82

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

Fig. 13. Scanning electron micrograph of a seed of Rubus idaeus from Armenia. (Image taken by Sugae Wada, Oregon State University).

species diversity. Examination of seed morphology can contribute to the confirmation of the botanical and horticultural identity (Fig. 13). Cleaned seeds can be packaged in airtight envelopes preserved at 20 C in 2.6 m3 chest freezers (Fig. 14). Rubus plants can be grown in environment chambers to simulate conditions in their native climatic

Fig. 14. Seed storage at the USDA Rubus Germplasm Repository, Corvallis: (A) Aluminized bags with seed stored at 20 C. (photo by H.K. Hall); (B) Labeled seed packets. (photo K. Hummer).

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

83

Fig. 15. Screenhouse at the Canadian Clonal Genebank, Harrow, Ontario. (photo by M. Luffman).

zones. Cold-hardy types, which can survive 10 C, can be maintained in screened houses in temperate climates (Fig. 15). This permits chilling units to be obtained naturally, while preventing virus vectors such as aphids from gaining access to the plants. In winter, screenhouses are heated only if the temperature drops below 3 C. Integrated pest management (IPM) is recommended to combine cultural practices, biological control agents, quarantine procedures, and physical exclusions to effectively manage plant diseases, arthropod pests, vertebrate pests, and weeds in the greenhouses, screenhouses, and fields The goal of the IPM program is to maintain pest populations at the lowest acceptable level to provide a healthy plant environment and a safe environment for workers and visitors. Light horticultural oils, insecticidal soap, and biological controls are available when cultural methods alone do not adequately control the problem. Key pests occur in large numbers and are destructive to plant health. Secondary pests include other less important pests. Minor pests include slugs, snails, ants, earwigs, leaf miners, leafrollers, mealy bugs, leaf midges, springtails, sowbugs, millipedes, and mice. Slugs and snails can cause serious damage to herbaceous species, particularly during the dormant season when they feed on roots and rhizomes. Raspberry accessions may also be propagated by dormant root cuttings. Root cuttings are collected during late winter or early spring, from February through March. Hardwood cuttings may also be taken for some species, but little success can be expected from this propagation

84

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

Fig. 16. Technician Jeanine DeNoma (left) and plant physiologist Barbara Reed, both of USDA ARS NCGR Corvallis, inspect plantlets stored in tissue culture. (photo by S. Ausmus, USDA ARS).

method for red raspberry. In addition, sets or dibs can be taken from species that tip root where canes touch the ground. Rubus genetic resources can be stored in tissue culture for secondary security backup (Fig. 16). Growth room conditions include light ranging from 10 to 1000 m mols1m2. Either warm or cool fluorescent bulbs produce the proper spectra for plant growth, although light requirements may vary for some genotypes. Air temperatures range from 22 to 28 C. Plantlets can be stored in semipermeable plastic bags for 1 to 3 years without transfer but must be evaluated three times a year for viability. Cultures can be stored up to 5 years under refrigerated

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

85

Fig. 17. Dewars of liquid nitrogen that preserve genetic resources at the Dresden Gene Bank in Germany. (photo by M. Ho¨fer).

conditions. For long-term alternative storage, meristems isolated from tissue cultured plants can be cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen (Fig. 17). D. Pathogens and Safe International Plant Movement Raspberry germplasm conserved in ex situ collections is often requested by users across international borders. This movement of seeds and plants introduces risks of inadvertently moving pathogens along with the plants. Many destructive plant disease epidemics in other crops have resulted following the accidental introduction of pathogens along with plant materials to new geographic regions. Quarantines are the first line of defense against the international movement of pathogens. Most countries use quarantine regulations to control the movement of plants that potentially may be infected with specific economically important pathogens. For example, Rubus stunt phytoplasma, raspberry ringspot virus, and tomato blackring virus are known to infect raspberries in Europe, but these pathogens are not known to occur in North America. The presence of bacterial or fungal pathogens can often be determined visually by their signs or symptoms. However, viruses, phytoplasmas, and other viruslike organisms may be symptomless and not visible with a light microscope. Clonally propagated plants, such as raspberries, can accumulate viruses and viruslike pathogens (Fig. 18), which are passed on each time plants are

86

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

Fig. 18. Leaf chlorosis in leaves of ‘Autumn Bliss’ as a result of raspberry bushy dwarf virus. (photo C. Kempler).

propagated. These pathogens can only be detected (Fig. 19) using specific laboratory or biological assays (Diekmann et al. 1994; Martin and Postman 1999). Virus indexing and virus elimination procedures are important activities at a gene bank involved in international plant exchange. Indexing procedures for raspberry viruses are regularly reviewed by the ISHS Working Group on Virus Diseases of Small Fruit Crops, and acceptable tests are recommended for use during plant

Fig. 19. Plant pathologist Robert Martin studies the results of serological tests on Rubus viruses. (photo by S. Ausmus, USDA ARS).

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

87

introduction or certification (Martin 2004). Specific viruses that are significant to international movement of raspberry germplasm and their indexing protocols were summarized by Diekmann et al. (1994). Many DNA- and RNA-based assays using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are available for pathogen detection. Although these techniques have increased sensitivity over older methods and often are the only tools available for detection of viruslike pathogens such as viroids and phytoplasmas, the serological-based enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the most economical and most widely used laboratory procedure (Martin 1998). This serological test is normally performed using a 96-well plastic microtiter plate. In the ELISA, a virus-specific antibody is used to trap virus particles from pulverized leaf tissue. A second enzyme-labeled antibody is used to label and visualize trapped viruses (Clark and Adams 1977). Raspberry viruses that can be detected by ELISA include arabis mosaic, apple mosaic (rare), cherry leafroll, cherry rasp leaf (rare), cucumber mosaic (rare), raspberry bushy dwarf, raspberry ringspot, strawberry latent ringspot, tobacco ringspot, tobacco streak (¼black raspberry latent), tomato black ring, and tomato ringspot (Martin 2004). Serological tests like ELISA can only be used to detect well-characterized viruses for which antivirus antiserum is available. Electron microscopic examination of leaf dips and double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) analysis are often used to screen for uncharacterized viruses. Mechanical inoculation of herbaceous indicator plants or graft inoculation onto select Rubus species or clones will detect many raspberry viruses that are not well characterized. Indicator plants will produce characteristic symptoms in response to infection by certain viruses. Inoculation of Chenopodium quinoa with raspberry leaf tissue that has been ground in an appropriate buffer can detect apple mosaic, arabis mosaic, blackberry calico (¼wineberry latent), black raspberry necrosis, bramble yellow mosaic, cherry leaf roll, cherry rasp leaf, cucumber mosaic, raspberry bushy dwarf, raspberry ringspot, Rubus Chinese seed-borne, strawberry latent ringspot, tobacco ringspot, tobacco streak (¼black raspberry latent), tomato black ring, and tomato ringspot viruses (Martin 2004; Stace-Smith 1987). Grafting a leaflet from a candidate plant onto a young Rubus occidentalis indicator plant can detect black raspberry necrosis, raspberry leaf curl, raspberry mosaic (virus complex), and Rubus yellow net viruses. The raspberry cultivars ‘Malling Landmark’ and ‘Norfolk Giant’ can also be graftinoculated as indicator plants to differentiate specific viruses that are components of the raspberry mosaic complex (Martin 2004; StaceSmith 1987).

88

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

Thermotherapy—growing infected plants at elevated temperatures for several weeks, followed by propagation of apical shoot tips—is the technique used to generate virus-free explants from virus-infected mother plants. A raspberry mother plant is grown for up to 3 weeks in a growth chamber heated to about 38 C. Afterward, meristem tips less than 1.0 mm long are excised and regenerated in vitro. Not all plants resulting from thermotherapy are pathogen free, and regenerated plants must be indexed to determine their virus status (Diekmann et al. 1994; Martin and Postman 1999). Once the investment is made to test raspberry plants for viruses and/or by applying therapy procedures to eliminate pathogens from infected plants, healthy plants must be protected from becoming reinfected. Gene banks and certification programs grow plants in screenhouses (Fig. 20) to prevent the entry of insect vectors. The most important vectors for raspberry viruses are aphids and nematodes. Aphid vectors must be excluded or controlled, and persons entering a screenhouse should be certain they are not carrying insects. Removal of flowers and exclusion of pollinators such as honeybees will prevent the movement of pollen-borne viruses such as raspberry bushy dwarf. Flower removal will also prevent fruit and seed development and possible clonal contamination by seedlings. Clones that index positive for viruses must be segregated from healthy or untested plants.

Fig. 20. Nuclear stock plants at SCRI. (photo by H.K. Hall).

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

89

E. Germplasm Assessment and Publication of Data The major commercial taxa of raspberries share a considerable amount of interfertility. Rubus idaeus and R. strigosus are completely interfertile (Darrow 1920) and are commonly regarded as two subspecies of the same species. The cross of R: occidentalis  R: idaeus is successful only if R. occidentalis is used as the female parent, although bud pollination and heat treatment can help overcome this unilateral incompatibility (Hellman et al. 1982). Finn and Hancock (Finn 2008) reported 40 species in Idaeobatus and a few species in the Cylactis, Anoplobatus, Chamaemorus, Dalibardastrum, Malachobatus, and Rubus that have been used in raspberry breeding. The conservation of germplasm in modern clonal germplasm repositories is of critical importance for the future availability of a broad gene pool for raspberry breeding. However, this is of little value or consequence if only minimal information and data collection programs are available. Acquisition of new material must be balanced with detailed scientific evaluation of the plant material to assess pest and disease resistance (Fig. 21), adaptation, and environmental factors affecting growth. In addition, information of plant growth, morphology, and fruit quality should be available for researchers. This material should also be accessible for prebreeding or full breeding programs to be able to mine the genetics for data and for information on traits that are inherited recessively among the clones being investigated. The use of an interactive Web site or other electronic methods to store this information is another key element for accessibility and maximum use of the preserved genetic resources. F. Germplasm Needs as Delineated by Traits Growers and producers have specific needs that cannot currently be met with available cultivars. New germplasm may enable improvements in cultivars for these traits. Any collections that might meet these needs are highly desired:  Disease resistance, particularly for: Phytophthora root rot (Phytophthora fragariae var. rubi) and RBDV in raspberry  Pest resistance, particularly for: new biotypes of Amphorophora agathonica and A. idaei that overcome previous resistance; raspberry beetle (Byturus sp.), particularly in Europe, and sap beetles (Glischrochilus sp.); caneborers (Agrilus ruficollis and Oberea bimaculata) in eastern North America; grass grub (Costelytra zelandica White) in New Zealand

90

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

Fig. 21. Oregon State University graduate research assistant Michael Dossett examines raspberry plants for aphids as part of data collection on germplasm accessions. (photo by S. Ausmus, USDA ARS).

 Environmental stress tolerance, particularly: to hot, humid climates, to drought, to high ultraviolet light intensity, and tolerance to cold winter environments  New sources of primocane fruiting characteristics  Adaptation to low-chill environments

III. BREEDING TECHNOLOGY A. Floral Biology Red raspberries and the species range of raspberry close relatives, the Idaeobati, are characterized by producing biennial canes that may fruit

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

91

in the first year on primocane tips (primocane fruiting) or in the second year in new laterals that have grown on floricanes (floricane fruiting). Flower initiation occurs basipetally in apical and axial buds within canes and within inflorescences when canes reach physiological maturity, but they normally require chilling before growing on to form flowers and set fruit (Waldo 1934). The attainment of physiological maturity is under genetic control, and in high-chill floricane types, it does not occur until stimulated by environmental signals, including both temperature and day length (Williams 1960). In temperate conditions, these initiate flower buds in late autumn or the following spring after growth resumes (Dale and Daubeny 1987). Initiation of the torus, sepals, and stamens occurs soon after bud initials, but further development may be arrested until spring when meiosis takes place in the anthers, followed by meiosis in the gynoecium up to 4 weeks later (Daubeny 1996). However, in primocane-fruiting types, buds are free to continue to grow and will develop into flowers and set fruit, providing environmental conditions are conducive for growth. Primocane fruiting occurs basipetally, with older, more mature canes usually fruiting first and younger, later canes following, if the season permits. Primocanefruiting cultivars have been developed specifically to enhance this trait, with several sources of earliness and enhanced production being used to facilitate the development of new cultivars. Specific adaptation to primocane production in raspberries utilizes earlier arrival of physiological maturity, combined with the ability to break bud without chilling as long as growing conditions are suitable. When low- or no-chill conditions are encountered in floricane types, dormancy remains, and new growth will not occur until after chilling is received. In low-chill conditions, most primocane fruiting cultivars also cease growth after 2 to 3 years due to secondary dormancy, but the cultivar ‘Summit’ continues to cycle indefinitely when pruned to the ground after fruiting (H.K. Hall, pers. observ.). ‘Polana’ may also have potential to be cropped in this manner as unchilled plants are able to produce similar yields as chilled (Dale 2008). Many of the Idaeobati produce secondary or tertiary buds arranged in descending order below primary buds and differentiate very late, again in order of bud maturity. These buds may enable recovery from unseasonal bud break during a warm period in winter or from frost damage, and they offer potential for selection for higher yields through increased fruit numbers (Daubeny 1996; Keep 1969a). Flower types observed in raspberries include hermaphroditic, pistillate, staminate,

92

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

and sterile. In cultivation, hermaphroditic is most common because strong selection pressure has been exerted for this trait (Jennings 1988). B. Hybridization Each parent used for crossing should be free of the common and resistance-breaking strains of RBDV and other pollen- and seed-borne viruses (Converse 1991; Daubeny 1986; Jennings and Jones 1989). RBDV is the most important virus problem with raspberries, causing poor seed set, poor fruit set, poor germination of seed, and yield losses. It also affects plant growth and ease of propagation. Elimination of RBDV-infected parents is a good way of limiting the spread of the virus and raising the health of seed populations (Daubeny 1996). Detection of the virus is possible by the use of ELISA, although care needs to be taken to reduce the likelihood of false positives when plate counters are used. False negatives also occur when virus load is not uniformly distributed within the plant. Crossing of raspberries may be done in the field or on potted plants under glass out of season to reduce work pressure when plants are flowering and fruiting in the field. Other advantages of performing crosses under protected culture include protection from cold- and wetweather conditions, reduced likelihood of plants becoming infected with RBDV or other viruses during or after crossing, and enhanced ability to intercross genotypes with different flowering and fruiting seasons. For making crosses in a greenhouse, quiescent plants are dug after growth has ceased and placed in cold storage (2 to 1 C) or potted (in a well-drained open potting mix) and placed in a screenhouse in cool conditions for chilling acquisition. After cold storage or chilling for 6 to 10 weeks, depending on the genotype, potted plants can be placed into a greenhouse at 14 to 21 C for flowering. Plants can be delayed for introduction into the greenhouse or put into cooler conditions to slow them down or brought in early or placed in warmer conditions to speed flower development. With most raspberries and deciduous Idaeobatus species, the time required for greenhouse flowering is 28 to 45 days. Some semi-evergreen and evergreen species may require a considerably longer period (Ourecky 1975a). They may be brought in earlier or used as seed parents utilizing stored pollen. With some programs it is considered essential to do crosses in a greenhouse when weather conditions may prevent or limit the ability to do crosses in the field. Other programs also may be advised to perform crosses in a greenhouse,

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

93

as some years crosses have been lost due to adverse weather, frost, wind, rain, or hail. In the PARC-BC program and in other programs where weather conditions are kind for field crossing, it is quick and effective to get a team to complete crosses within a few days. Agriculture Canada use white glassine bags to cover flower clusters prior to anthesis on plants chosen as male parents. At the same time, flowers on chosen female parents that are in the plump bud stage yet not beginning to open are emasculated and also covered with bags. Care is to be taken that flowers that are emasculated are not too advanced as anthers may dehisce at an early stage, sometimes before flowers are open. Pollen from mother parents will cause fruits to set if self-pollination occurs, as most raspberry cultivars are fully self-fertile. Emasculation can be effected with a sharp scalpel, safety razor, or very sharp watchmaker’s forceps. Stray pollen grains are killed on hands and tools using 70% to 80% ethanol or isopropanol (not methylated spirits or methanol) before emasculations of different genotypes. Small flower buds are removed as they are difficult to emasculate and they would take too long to mature before becoming receptive for pollination. Emasculation is performed by making a cut around the base of the flower bud that removes the sepals, petals, and whorl of stamens, leaving behind the undamaged stem and the pistils borne on the receptacle. Two days after emasculation, open flowers are taken from bagged laterals of the designated male parents and brushed over the stigmatic surfaces on the emasculated mother flowers. This is repeated at 2-day intervals for up to 6 days (Daubeny 1996). Some genotypes produce copious quantities of nectar, which forms drops on flowers that can be a sticky problem when using flowers for pollination. This can be removed by touching the droplet with a match or sterilized instrument. When pollen is scarce, or if the paternal parent is going to finish flowering before female flowers are available, anthers can be collected and dried for pollen to be stored in a desiccator with calcium chloride (CaCl2) or silica gel. Ourecky (1975b) advocated the use of sulfuric acid in a shallow dish to facilitate rapid drying and dehiscing of larger quantities of anthers. Use of an incandescent light bulb 60 cm above an open petri dish of anthers or placement of the anthers in sunlight in a greenhouse also will promote drying of viable pollen (H.K. Hall, pers. observ.; Ourecky 1975a). Storage of pollen is possible in a sealed desiccator at 4 to 5 C with continuing viability for 4 or more weeks. Containers for storing of pollen may include polycarbonate, glass, or seamless metal salve tins; use of plastic petri dishes or vials is not advised as problems may be experienced with static electricity causing

94

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

the pollen to stick to the plastic surface. Some problems may also be experienced with polycarbonate, but fogging the pollen for a moment with the breath can unstick the pollen from the vial surface. Application of pollen from the storage containers is possible by rubbing the stigmatic surfaces with the inside surface of the storage vessel or by the use of a camel-hair brush. Synthetic brushes give problems with static, similar to plastic storage containers. When stigmatic surfaces are receptive, the stigma opens out and exposes a sticky surface for pollination. After pollination has been successful, or the flowers no longer are receptive, the stigma and style starts to brown off very quickly, showing that further pollination is unnecessary. After pollination, bags are reapplied and kept on the lateral until fruit ripens. Large paperclips are effective in holding bags on the developing lateral, and if lateral attachment is weak, bags can be pinned to canes as well as covering the lateral. Neither brown nor plastic bags should be used as the former excludes light and the latter raises the temperature around the lateral (Daubeny 1996). If crossing is done in a protected environment, it is useful to have the crossing house enclosed with insect-proof screens to prevent access by bees or flies. In this situation, a greater number of flowers on a lateral can be used for pollination and crosses can be carried out over an extended period without bagging emasculated flowers. The environment is continually dry and pollinations are not affected by weather. In addition, seed germination may be better from seed produced in a protected environment as problems with poor pollination of ovules are reduced. Seed set and germination are also strongly influenced by the seed parent (Jennings 1971a,c). Thus it is wise to make reciprocal crosses when possible to be sure of producing seedlings of the desired genetic combination. C. Seed Extraction and Storage Mature fruit can be collected and stored in a refrigerator, not a freezer, as freezing reduces viability of seed quickly, until sufficient numbers have been harvested for seed extraction. It has been a common practice to extract seed extracted by using a laboratory blender to break up the fruit and remove pulp from seed by blending fruit in a pulp/water mixture at a slow to medium speed for a short time; 7 to 30 seconds is usually enough (Galletta 1983; Morrow et al. 1954). Firmer-fruited selections pose more difficulty for extraction of seed. For this reason, some programs now use an additional extraction aid by adding pectinase into the fruit/water mixture and incubating it

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

95

overnight at 37 C or at room temperature for 2 to 3 days before blending. Once the fruit/water mixture has been blended, the mixture is poured into a container and washed with extra water. Pulp and unviable seeds can be poured off, and clean viable seeds remain in the bottom of the vessel. Seed is air dried on paper towels or in plastic cups kept at room temperature and stored in a refrigerator at 1 to 5 C until time for seed treatment and planting. If properly dried and stored, seeds of most Rubus species remain viable for several years when kept in cool storage (Ourecky 1975a). At the National Clonal Germplasm Repository at Corvallis, Oregon, Rubus seed is stored in aluminized plastic bags at 20 C, and the seed remains viable for extended periods of time (Fig. 14). D. Seed Treatment and Germination Pregermination treatment is necessary in most cases for prompt and uniform sprouting of seeds of most temperate and Arctic Rubus species (Ourecky 1975a). Usually this consists of a scarification treatment to make the seed permeable and able to swell, followed by stratification, which satisfies chill requirements needed for growth to occur (Daubeny 1996). Following these two treatments, seed can be sown on the surface of a light, open soil mix in a flat or pot and placed in moist, warm conditions with plenty of light to promote sprouting and growth of seedlings. Light is significant in the promotion of raspberry seed germination (Scott and Draper 1967). Moisture also is critical at this step, and germination is much reduced or stopped if seeds dry out even once (H.K. Hall, pers. observ.). Scarification usually consists of treatment with concentrated sulfuric acid (5–20 minutes for raspberry or Idaeobatus seed), followed by washing with water and sometimes abrasion to remove carbonized endocarp, then further scarification with calcium hypochlorite and an excess of calcium hydroxide for 1 week (Adams 1927; Heit 1967; Jennings and Tulloch 1965; Rose 1919; Scott and Ink 1957). Seed are then washed and stratified in bags of moist peat, sphagnum, vermiculite, or other moisture-absorbent medium at 4 C for 6 weeks or up to 10 weeks when the female parent is a high-chill genotype (Daubeny 1996; H.K. Hall, pers. observ.). Variations on this seed treatment protocol are reported from EMR, where acid treatment alone or bleach alone was used (Knight 2002b). Concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4) was applied to seeds for 90 minutes with containers plunged into an ice bath. Seeds were then washed under running water for 10 minutes and then stored in distilled water

96

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

for 7 to 8 days, changing the water 2 to 3 times during this period. As an alternative seed were treated with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) (50% household bleach) for 24 hr, then washed in running water and soaked in distilled water as above. Both treatments had variable results with the range of germination success from 1% to 78% with acid treatment and 1% to 90% with bleach. No comments were passed on the state of the seed in treatments with low germination percentages, but it appears likely that in some cases, each treatment could have been too severe. No comments were passed either on the number of seeds treated in each vessel or the volume of chemical used. Both are very important to the final result. In New Zealand, the method Jennings and Tulloch used was: 200 seeds were treated with 9 ml concentrated H2SO4 for 15 minutes in a polycarbonate vial that was immersed above the acid level in an ice bath. When the 15 minutes had elapsed, the seed was poured into a fine-mesh stainless steel sieve under running water and the seed was rubbed with a gloved finger (household rubber gloves) for 20 to 30 seconds, which removed much of the carbonized endocarp. Seed were immediately returned to the washed vial, and 15ml of Ca(OCl)2 saturated with Ca(OH)2 was added. Seed vials were then kept for 1 week in a coolstore before rinsing under running water and being placed into small zip-lock bags of moist sieved peat for 6 weeks’ cool storage at 4 C. Calcium hypochlorite solution was produced by adding 28.5g Ca(OCl)2 and 3 teaspoons Ca(OH)2 to each liter of solution. When seed numbers are low, it is essential to reduce the quantity of hypochlorite solution added to the vial; otherwise the seed will have the endocarp completely stripped away and be rendered inviable. After completing stratification, the peat/seed mixtures were mixed with dry river sand and sown on the surface of flats of a 50:50 peat/sand mix with added fertilizer. Care was taken to ensure that none of the flats dried out at all, as experience has shown that if a flat dries out once, even for a few hours, the seed will no longer germinate. Trays were placed in full light conditions in a greenhouse and given supplementary lighting to promote germination. Germination percentages were very high, usually over 75%. Dale and Jarvis (1983) reported that moist chilling could be eliminated if seed was treated immediately after harvest with concentrated sulfuric acid for 20 minutes and then immersed for 6 days in a solution of calcium hypochlorite, with excess calcium hydroxide, supplying 1% available chlorine. This method has been successfully used in the British Columbia breeding program (Daubeny 1996). Scarified seed was sown immediately after scarification onto a

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

97

medium of peat moss, perlite, vermiculite, and a small amount of sand and covered lightly. Pots were placed in an incubator maintained at 25 C and a relative humidity of approximately 95% with a 16-hr day length. Germination began within 4 weeks (Daubeny 1996). In blackberries, use of chlorine bleach treatment alone has been used to scarify seed (Campbell et al. 1988). This method has also been used with raspberries at EMR, sometimes giving better seed germination than with the acid seed treatment protocol. Seed germination also appears to be promoted by timing the sowing of treated seed with normal springtime conditions, growth being promoted by rising temperatures and lengthening days. Other methods have been used for seed germination in raspberries and are applicable especially when seed numbers are low, including cutting or nicking seed coats before sowing or using in vitro methods to germinate seed. Nesme (1985) obtained over 90% germination after scarification by cutting endocarp, testa, and endosperm of seed. However, intact seeds and those only injured in the endocarp or endocarp and testa did not germinate unless the endosperm was damaged as well. Ke et al. (1985) used in vitro germination to obtain seedlings of crosses of raspberry with blackberry, and in New Zealand, similar techniques were used to germinate interspecific hybrids of raspberries from crosses between red and black raspberry (H.K. Hall, pers. observ.). Seeds were disinfected and cut in half before being placed on tissue culture medium under sterile conditions, and in 2 to 3 months, actively growing seedlings were potted from some crosses. In vitro germination of raspberries also has been used in the program of Galletta et al. (1986), where raspberries were successfully germinated, grown in tissue culture, grown to maturity, and resulted in selections in the field. E. Seedling Evaluation An effective raspberry breeder must understand genetics, plant physiology, biochemistry, statistics, botany, taxonomy, mutation biology, plant anatomy, entomology, plant pathology, and prophecy as well as being an observant horticulturalist or agronomist (J.N. Moore 1988). To Moore’s 1998 list we could now add molecular biology, engineering, and other disciplines. Today’s breeder has to be able to select the cultivars suited for the current industry and also anticipate changes to come all the way through the production and marketing chain to produce the cultivars of the future. Without doubt a breeder needs wisdom, insight, and understanding, not to

98

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

mention tenacity to carry out an ambitious breeding program with often a token budget that has to be fought for and guarded from continual erosion. For efficiency, methods of managing seedling populations in a raspberry breeding program need to have four characteristics (Sherman and Lyrene 1983): 1. Rapid advance of plants from seed to fruiting to maximize genetic gain per year 2. Minimization of nongenetic variation among seedlings so that phenotypic differences will accurately reflect genotypic differences 3. Low cost per seedling so that a maximum number of seedlings can be grown 4. Provision for natural selection for favorable characters or for artificial screening for resistance to diseases, insects, and nematodes at a young stage Seedlings from crosses germinated in late winter/early spring grow well if provided with good growing conditions, and plants can be raised to be planted in the field in mid- to late spring. If weed control is good and seedlings are managed well, they can grow and produce primocane flowers and fruit before the end of the growing season, or produce a significant crop on floricanes the following spring/summer. If resources do not allow field management to be intensive during the first year, plants are better raised a little later in spring and grown in pots until planting in late autumn. When handled this way, larger established seedlings can be placed in the field and dormant plants can be oversprayed with some herbicide formulations for weed control. The plants will grow strongly during the next growing season and produce a very good primocane crop or floricane crop. In British Columbia, a common practice has been to prune the first year’s growth to the ground and to take the first crop on second-year canes. In northern Washington, with excellent management it was possible in one season to obtain good growth for fruiting the following summer. The warmer climates and longer growing seasons of California, Australia, and New Zealand make it much easier to produce good growth to enable a significant crop to be produced on first-year canes. At SCRI and at Geneva, New York, seedlings may take until the third year from seed to reach maturity, and assessments are often not possible until the third growing season in the field (Daubeny 1996). Planting density of red raspberries is not as close as possible with crown-forming black raspberry or blackberry seedling populations

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

99

because seedlings need to be kept separate for propagation purposes after selections have been taken. For best results with seedlings, individual hills should be kept 1 to 1.3m apart, with row spacing 3 meters or more apart, especially when seedling vigor is high (Daubeny 1996). In New Zealand, research costs for growing seedlings have been reduced through grower provision of fields for seedling populations. Selection of seedlings for spinelessness, screening for pest and disease resistance, and use of molecular biology to screen for markers for resistance or economic traits also are valuable for reducing field seedling costs, either by reducing management or by rejecting seedlings that would have been culled later. Screening of seedlings for spinelessness is easy among seedling populations segregating for gene s, where spineless segregates are devoid of stalked glands around the edge of cotyledonary leaves and spiny plants are easily seen by the presence of glandular hairs. With good eyesight, glandular hairs can be seen with the naked eye; for those with less keen vision, hairs can be clearly seen in good light conditions with a hand lens. Spineless segregates can be planted into cell trays when they grow the first true leaves and spiny segregates discarded. Reaction to the aphid vectors of the raspberry mosaic virus complex, Amphorophora idaei (Borner) in Europe and Amphorophora agathonica Hottes in North America, is done as a primary screen in several breeding programs (Daubeny 1996). There has been good agreement between the reactions of young seedlings and the reactions of mature plants to the aphids (Daubeny 1986; Parker 1977). Screening for resistance to Verticillium wilt caused by Verticillium albo-atrum Reinke and Berth is reported by Fiola and Swartz (1989), but this protocol appears better suited to be used for screening selections of cultivar potential for resistance (Daubeny 1996). Preplant screening might also be possible with root lesion nematode (Pratylenchus penetrans (Cobb) Sher Allen); raspberry bud moth; Heterocrossa rubophaga Dugdale; Aphis idaei v. de G., and Aphis ribicola Oestl, the aphid vectors of raspberry vein chlorosis virus and raspberry leaf curl virus, respectively; two spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch); powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca macularis (Fr.) Jackewski); raspberry leaf spot Sphaerulina rubi Demaree & M. S. Wilcox; and other leaf and cane diseases. Production of primocane-fruiting types in the first year of growth in the field is usually the best possible indicator of plant performance, providing the seedlings were planted early enough to allow development of full primocane-fruiting potential. Selection of outstanding primocane-fruiting clones is possible on the basis of fruit size and

100

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

quality, vigor, plant habit, yield components, especially branching and potential yield, usually by the trained eye of the breeder. Floricane types can be selected for fruit quality and size as well as growth habit and yield components in the first fruiting season, but often selection for yield, vigor, cane numbers, plant health and mature growth cannot be evaluated until the second or third harvest season. Selection skill is becoming more difficult to acquire as many universities have dropped formal training programs in plant breeding and breeding programs in raspberries are becoming more secretive, not publishing or allowing rival breeding programs access to information that is essential for training unskilled breeders. Public breeding programs are being reduced, many are refusing rival programs access to genetics, and most are patenting or registering cultivars for plant protection under UPOV (Daubeny 1995b; Future of public breeding programs 2001). Since intentional improvement of raspberry cultivars was begun, breeders have chosen selections according to their individual artistic sense of fruit shape and appearance as well as their overall view of the plant. This has led to different style fruits being produced at different locations. More recently, artistic flair has been augmented by scientific training to assisted assessment for high quality and productive traits. Larger programs have teams of breeders and other specialists who examine the best selections before advancing elite lines to the next stage of evaluation. Nevertheless, evaluation by eye, even by a team of specialists, may not produce a perfect or even a good assessment of a selection. In strawberry, visual assessments by breeders also have given imperfect pictures of elite material, but this was overcome by evaluating seedlings as part of a designed genetic experiment as well as by using intensive methods of gathering data on the seedling progenies, including fruit harvest of individual seedlings (Shaw and Luby 2005). This approach has also been used in raspberry breeding, and it resulted in the identification of elite individual selections that were not recognized by members of the breeding team before data was analyzed (Connor et al. 2005a,b; H.K. Hall, pers. observ.). A particular selection of significance from these seedling populations was a veryhigh-yielding clone, which fruited over a long harvest season and was not identified as a selection by visual means. This has subsequently been used in further breeding, transferring higher yield potential into seedling progenies. There is little doubt that this approach will result in greater gains by future raspberry breeders, especially when adaptations are made to machine harvesters allowing real-time data collection of yields and

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

101

collection of separate fruit samples of individual seedlings throughout large seedling blocks. The technology for this exists but has not yet been put together in an operating package for assessment of raspberry seedling populations. Unless the genetics of a particular trait are known, it is difficult to predict the size of population needed to achieve a specific objective (Ourecky 1975a). When breeding behavior is not known, a progeny of 100 to 200 seedlings generally gives the potential of a specific combination. However, larger population sizes are advisable if crosses involve parents that are genetically diverse, with backgrounds from different species (Daubeny 1996) or with specific traits to introgress into locally adapted germplasm. The amounts of space and labor available may be overriding limitations, especially since budgets for breeding have diminished significantly in recent years, with other specialized skill areas taking up resources that used to be devoted to breeding (Ourecky 1975a; Sjulin 2003). Seedling numbers in breeding populations of raspberries vary considerably from program to program, depending on availability of land, labor, materials, and supplies to maintain plants over a period of 2 to 4 years while selection for horticultural traits is made (Daubeny 1996). Current breeding programs plant as few as 700 seedlings every third or fourth year, to as many as 30,000 planted into the field per year (Daubeny 1996; Finn et al. 2008; H.K. Hall, pers. observ.). In Russia, large numbers of seedlings were grown in the mid-1970s (Kichina 1976), but this progress does not appear to have been sustained through the political upheavals that have been experienced there in the last decade. When selections chosen for advancement to the next stage of evaluation and for becoming parents of the next generation of seeding populations have been propagated and removed from the seedling field, remaining seedlings should be removed as soon as possible (Daubeny 1996). In the British Columbia program, roots are taken from selected plants during the fall, and after surface sterilization, they are propagated by root cuttings. Other programs dig canes or take plant material for initiation into tissue culture or use some combination of these three protocols with the different selections from the program according to the priority placed on them by the breeder and the resources available. Leaf tissue of selections in the PARC-BC program is tested for RBDV by ELISA. If a positive reaction is obtained, the selection is discarded. Selections that become infected after flowering in the field for only 1 year in BC are considered ultra-susceptible to natural pollen infection from the virus and to be a risk if grown on a large scale (Daubeny 1996).

102

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

F. Selection Evaluation In the HRNZ raspberry breeding program, plants pass through five stages to be released as commercial cultivars (Hall and Stephens 2006): Stage I. Seedling evaluation in a field seedling block Stage II. Preliminary observation plots (1–2 plants per plot, 1–2 replicates) Stage III. Replicated trials of elite clones (4–7 plants per plot, 3–4 replicates) Stage IV. Larger- scale plots and grower trials (10-m plots up to 1 ha) Stage V. Registration for plant patent and plant variety rights This process establishes the potential for commercial success of individual selections and gives growing experience to base management recommendations for cultivar release. In addition, growers and researchers become aware of pitfalls with each selection that could result in obstacles for commercial success (Hall and Stephens 2006). At each stage, standards were included according to the current commercial cultivars and the advanced selections most likely to be released in future. In the PARC-BC program, selections of cultivar potential are bulked to 9 disease-free plants for trialing (3 plots of 3 plants), and plants retained for breeding purposes are placed in a single 3-plant plot (Daubeny 1996). Cultivar standards are included there in trials on a similar basis to the HRNZ program, with a mixture of process and fresh commercial standards along with the latest new cultivar releases. In Britain, Meiosis (an independent nursery body set up to introduce new cultivars in the United Kingdom and to fund research) manages trials of promising selections from EMR and SCRI and around the world. A similar trialing system is also operated by Hargreaves Plants, the largest commercial raspberry nursery in Britain, assessing elite selections from many programs internationally. Selections are placed in primocanefruiting or floricane-fruiting grower observation trials each year, and every 5 to 6 years the most promising selections are placed in replicated trials funded by the Horticulture Development Council (HDC) (Knight 2002a). Depending on the mode of fruiting (primocane or floricane), location, and speed of establishment of plots, horticultural evaluation of selections compared with standards is begun at the earliest at the end of the first growing season for primocane-fruiting types. In floricanefruiting types, evaluations usually begin in the second or third year of

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

103

growth, but in a cool, short season location assessment may begin in the fourth year. If sufficient labor is available, plots will be harvested at 2- to 5-day intervals for the duration of the production period. This may be as many as 14 times for floricane-fruiting clones or sometimes 20 or more times for primocane-fruiting types. In addition to yield, data are collected on fruit size and fruit rots at harvest, and fruit is evaluated for anthocyanin concentration, color, ease of harvest, flavor, firmness, fresh and process market suitability, shelf life, soluble solids, titratable acidity, and reactions to postharvest fruit rots. For the fresh market, floricane-fruiting selections need to outperform ‘Tulameen’ (Plates 2G and 6C) for firmness; nondarkening bright red color; appearance; light, fresh and sweet flavor; shelf life; and productivity; or equal to ‘Tulameen’ and produce in an earlier or later harvest season. Primocane-season fresh-market types also have ‘Tulameen’ as a minimum standard for fruit quality and should also achieve similar or better yields than long-cane ‘Tulameen’. For process cultivars, fruit firmness and ease of harvest are essential. Color should be dark, similar to ‘Meeker’ and ‘Willamette’, the flavor rich and moderately acidic, anthocyanin levels and sugars high, and be suitable for individually quick frozen (IQF) fruit, dessert packs, juice, jam, and other processing applications (Daubeny 1996). Some tolerance to light fruit color is currently extended to process cultivars for IQF production, but this may not last when high-quality and high-yielding IQF cultivars with darker fruit color become available. If labor is not available for harvest, good estimates of yield can be made (Daubeny et al. 1986), but if yields are estimated, postharvest fruit assessments are not possible. Even if samples are obtained for evaluations, they may not be typical of fruit harvested at regular intervals because of the greater likelihood of variable ripeness and exposure to fruit rot organisms. This factor also may be an issue even when a full harvest program is practiced, as fruit often are overripe for the purposes of shelf life and fresh market evaluations. Horticultural evaluations also include the aspects of growth habit. The ideal habit has strongly attached, mid-length, semi-upright (lateral angle 30 –80 from vertical), outstretched laterals on sturdy, spine-free upright canes. Fruits are spaced at relatively wide intervals along laterals and not bunched, either at tips or nodes, and easily visible for hand picking. An open habit with outstretched laterals promotes a natural environment limiting the spread of Botrytis fruit rots (Daubeny 1996; Daubeny and Pepin 1981; H.K. Hall, pers. observ.). Sufficient, but not excessive, numbers of vigorous primocanes need to be produced for propagation, cane replacement, and production of an abundant crop.

104

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

Moderate cane vigor and numbers are extremely important, especially in locations with good growing conditions and management. Overabundant growth induces long internode lengths, reduction in fruiting nodes per cane if pruned off at a standard height, and ongoing management costs to reduce cane numbers and length. Restrictions on the availability of spray chemicals for cane vigor control have caused difficulties for growers and were directly responsible for the demise of the SCRI cultivar ‘Glen Clova’ (Glen Clova casualty of Dinoseb ban 1986; Government to help Glen Clova growers replant 1988; Howard et al. 1989; Lawson and Wiseman 1989). In addition, growing of raspberries in a region prone to spring and summer rainfall poses weather restrictions on cane growth control as most chemicals need to be applied to dry plants in fine weather (Crandall and Adams 1979). In colder temperate regions, winter-hardiness is a primary concern in the evaluation of new selections of cultivar potential. Selection for hardiness usually depends on weather fluctuations and the arrival of unusually cold ‘‘test winters.’’ However, winter damage on different clones may vary according to acclimation, timing of the temperature shock, and weather before the cold period arrives (Daubeny 1987a). For dependable winter-hardiness, especially in areas where periods of warmer weather occur during winter, selection for early dormancy and late bud break is likely to achieve good results (Daubeny 1996). Lack of winter chill can limit production of floricane-fruiting types, due to poor bud break and lateral formation. This occurs in regions with low-chill climates, such as central coastal California, Mexico, New Zealand and southeastern Australia. For dual-cropping cultivars grown in the two-crop production system in California, advantage is taken from floricane raspberries predisposition to have their best budbreak in the first production season. However, for floricane-cropping cultivars grown in the normal annual production system, bud break needs to continue to be uniform and high for the second and subsequent production seasons; it cannot rely only on the ability of plants to exhibit better bud break in their first year of production. In British Columbia and other northern hemisphere cool temperate breeding programs, aphid infestations are monitored in the planting and subsequent seasons on all selections and cultivars in the field. This is an effective process to ensure that seedlings classed as resistant as juvenile seedlings are actually resistant in the field as mature plants. It also helps the breeder to be vigilant for the presence of resistance-breaking aphid biotypes, providing natural infestations are relatively high and well distributed throughout trial plantings (Daubeny 1996).

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

105

During the second and subsequent years in the field, each selection is examined for disease symptoms, including crown gall (Agrobacterium tumefaciens [Smith & Towns] Conn.), cane Botrytis (B. cinerea), spur blight (Didymella applanata [Niessl] Sacc.), anthracnose or cane spot (Elsinoe veneta Burkh. Jenk.), cane blight (Leptosphaeria coniothyrium [Fuckel] Sacc.), powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca macularis (Fr.) Jackewski), yellow rust (¼cane rust, western yellow rust) (Phragmidium rubi-idaei (DC.) P. Karst.), late leaf rust (Pucciniastrum americanum [Farl.] Arth.), leaf spot (Sphaerulina rubi Dem & Wilc.), and bacterial blight (Pseudomonas syringae van Hall). At the same time, examinations are made for insect, mite, and nematode damage, possibly including aphids (Fig. 26) (Aphis idaei v. d. Goot, Aphis ribicola Oestlund, Amphorophora agathonica Hottes or Amphorophora idaei Boern.); eastern raspberry fruit worm (Byturus rubi Barber); raspberry cane beetle (Byturus tomentosus [De Geer.]); raspberry bud moth (Heterocrossa adreptella Walker); black vine weevil (Otiorhynchus sulcatus [F.]) and other weevils; grass grub (Costelytra zealandica [White]); and various nematodes (Pratylenchus penetrans [Cobb 1917] Chitwood and Oteifa 1952, Xiphinema americanum Cobb, and Longidorus elongans [de Man]). When RBDV pressure is high, plants can be screened for natural infection each year. It is important to cull plants that rapidly acquire the virus in these conditions because they will have a limited commercial life unless used in long-cane or dual-crop production systems. When the resistance breaking strain (RB) of RBDV is not present, selection for RBDV resistance through gene Bu is possible. When virus pressure is low, a benign strain of non-RB RBDV is present, or a selection has multigene resistance to quick infection with the virus, plants can escape infection with RBDV for an extended period, as found with ‘Glen Moy’ and the New Zealand cultivar ‘Kaituna’. Breeding programs consider the important pests and diseases for their region. Others may be nonexistent, unimportant because of cultural methods used, or of minor importance in their locality so they do not warrant investment of resources to combat them. However, as programs become larger and multinational in their outlook, it will be important to consider pests and diseases for the target markets outside of their own region. In the past, this has not been possible in the absence of natural infection, unless the chance use of resistant parents has given rise to resistant selections among the progenies. In some, cases it may be possible to select for resistance to a related disease that is present that could be expected to give resistance to the major disease from that genus present in the target market. In New Zealand,

106

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

Phytophthora fragariae var. rubi is not present but selection for resistance to P. citrophthora can be expected to give resistance to the highly pathogenic relative present in the United States, Canada, and Europe. When molecular biology techniques to screen for resistance in seedlings by marker assisted selection (MAS) are available, screening may be possible in locations where the disease is absent (Weber et al. 2008a). Even where the disease is present, MAS promises to speed up identification of resistant segregants and reduce the resources invested in breeding by eliminating the growing of susceptible segregants in the field. MAS will also eliminate the spread of the disease into breeding fields on the roots of resistant segregants identified by standard inoculation techniques. With most diseases and pests, the breeder relies on natural infection for selection of resistance or tolerance, but inoculation for cane blight, cane Botrytis, and spur blight has been used at SCRI (H.K. Hall, pers. observ.). At EMR, resistance to cane spot and powdery mildew has been evaluated through the use of inoculation techniques (Keep 1989). At Puyallup, the WSU program used high-RBDV inoculum pressure in an intensive potted plant trial to identify resistant selections and cultivars. Gene H controlling cane hairiness or pubescence has been considered for selection at EMR and SCRI because of its association with resistance to cane blight, cane Botrytis, and spur blight (Jennings 1988; Keep 1989). However, gene H was also found to be associated with reduced resistance to cane spot, powdery mildew, and yellow rust (Jennings and Brydon 1989a; Jennings and McGregor 1988). The action of the gene is unknown, but it may be caused by pleiotropic effects, be linked with genes controlling reactions to these diseases, or the presence of hairs may modify the microenvironment to make infection less or more likely. Selection for plants homozygous for gene s, producing spine-free canes, and the dominant gene B for waxy bloom on canes can also reduce spur blight incidence but, like gene H, the actions of these genes are unknown (Jennings 1988). Combining genes s, B, and H produces increased levels of resistance (Daubeny 1996). Selection for root rot (Phytophthora fragariae var. rubi Wilcox & Duncan) (Pfr) resistance is becoming more important in raspberry breeding programs worldwide as devastating outbreaks of root rot can almost wipe out an industry, as experienced in Australia in 1994 to 1996 (Daubeny 2002b; Graham and Smith 2002; McGregor and Franz 2002). In the Pacific Northwest, one of the factors that led to the replacement of ‘Willamette’ with ‘Meeker’ was the susceptibility to Pfr, but in some locations this resistance is failing (P.P. Moore and

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

107

Daubeny 1993). Few breeding programs have trial plots for doing infield evaluations for Pfr resistance. In most cases where trial areas have become infected, the programs have shifted to new clean soil for evaluation of seedlings and trialing selections. A significant exception to this is the WSU breeding program based at Farm 5 at Puyallup, where the trial site soils are highly infected with Pfr and only the most resistant selections survive. Over the last 37 years, trials at Puyallup have screened many species, selections, and cultivars from WSU breeding, from the PARC-BC program in British Columbia, and from around the world (Barritt 1970; Barritt et al. 1981; Bristow et al. 1988). Good sources of Pfr resistance have been found in R. idaeus, R. illecebrosus, R. strigosus, R. parvifolius, R. parviflorus, R. spectabilis, and R. sumatranus, especially when the source accession has been selected from a wet site (Bristow et al. 1988). This trial site acts as an excellent secondary screen to selections chosen for potential Pfr resistance. Pfr-resistant selections in current breeding programs have been produced from R. strigosus (‘Latham’ plus at least four other resistant R. strigosus accessions), R. idaeus (‘Asker’ ¼ ‘Winkler’s Sa¨mling’), R. spectabilis and R. sumatranus. Secondary screening protocols are also available for determining tolerance or resistance to black vine weevil, cane midge, crown gall, and Eastern raspberry fruit worm (Daubeny 1986; Keep 1989). Resistance to two-spotted mite is also becoming important for selection in raspberries, as this pest is more prevalent when plants are grown in warmer and drier environments, especially under protection and in warm temperate and subtropical conditions. In British Columbia, selections that appear superior to standard cultivars after more than 3 years of trialing in first test plots are propagated for more extensive trials, with local growers and at research sites locally and with other research programs in North America and overseas (Daubeny 1996). Research sites have been chosen to represent as many environments as possible so that environmental resilience of the selection and its commercial potential can be determined. A selection performing well at a distant site is propagated for grower trials in that region, and sometimes the selection is released as a cultivar on the basis of that performance, even when it is not commercially promising in British Columbia. For example, ‘Algonquin’ was released because of its performance in eastern Canada and Denmark (Daubeny et al. 1991). During the evaluation process, plants for distribution as dormant canes, root cuttings, and tissue-cultured propagules need to be kept clean of viruses as well as other diseases and pests. This is best done by generating high-health nuclear stock that is kept free of pathogens in an

108

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

insect-proof screenhouse (Fig. 20) (Dolan and Barker 2008). Highhealth stock is maintained for distribution to certified propagators if the selection warrants release as a commercial cultivar (Daubeny 1996). Movement of plant material from country to country is much easier when health status has been well documented through a testing program and when plants have been placed in tissue culture. A well-organized breeding program evaluates all selections each year to make decisions to advance them to the next level of assessment, retain them for breeding, or discard them. If a selection has already been used for breeding, it should automatically be retained until progenies are evaluated so that if it has superior performance, it can be used again for breeding. If the selection is sufficiently promising, a decision can be made to fast track it to a higher level of assessment as well as the next level, for example, directly from Stage I to Stage IV, using tissue culture to bulk the plants. All such fast-track movements increase the risk to grower and nursery if the plant is quickly passed through to commercialization, but if the selection is sufficiently superior it will pay dividends. Even if a selection is fast tracked, evaluations should give sufficient information to make reliable decisions on registration for plant patents or plant variety rights and commercial release. In addition, information should be available for a growing protocol to be tailored for the new cultivar in commercial cultivation. G. Privatization, Plant Patent/PVR Descriptions and Strategies Intellectual property protection, globalization, and pressure on public budgets in many industrialized countries have shifted the balance of plant breeding activity from the public to the private sector (Heisey et al. 2001). In raspberry breeding, most of the activity is in industrialized countries. Much of the historical raspberry breeding has been carried out there, although in recent years, there has been increased activity in some of the less industrialized nations. Since the 1990s, a devastating wave of budget cuts, new innovations, restructurings, and program closures has seen the demise of many small, publicly funded raspberry breeding programs, with the accompanying loss of much of the research in allied or supporting fields and the redirection of funds to the protection of intellectual property rights in the larger programs (Daubeny 1995b). In some cases, support programs in biochemistry or molecular biology have been elevated to become programs in their own right, in spite of the removal of the breeding programs that they were developed to support.

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

109

The place of horticulture as a science and horticultural plant breeding programs has been eroded in universities. Many scientists prefer to be known as geneticists, molecular biologists, botanists, or specialists in other areas. Horticultural plant breeding has suffered significantly in the last 30 years, especially in minor crops such as raspberry. As public funding for agricultural research has diminished, scientists have been required either to curtail their research efforts or to seek grant funds to continue their programs (J.N. Moore 1988). At the same time, leadership in research organizations has diminished and managers have taken over at all levels of authority, requiring much greater justification of the work that has been done or is to be done, particularly in validating expenditure. The overall result has been that the close relationship between scientists and industry has been eroded, and efforts toward solving industry problems have diminished (J.N. Moore 1988). The number of university programs in horticulture has been greatly reduced. At secondary school level, horticulture has come to be regarded as the course for nonacademics who may end up making their living working for local horticulture industries (picking, pruning, training, etc). Numbers of plant breeding graduates available for research positions both in the public and private sectors are limited, and highly trained breeders from public programs are being encouraged into private sector programs, to be replaced in many cases by less trained support staff. In other breeding programs, retirement or death of the specialist has led to immediate closure of the program and culling or loss of much valuable germplasm. Public sector investment in raspberry breeding may have benefits to society that the private sector’s activities may not. For example, it may foster greater sharing of information and more work on traits of plant cultivars, such as accumulating genetic improvements from wild species that may take 20 to 40 years to show significant benefits in terms of cultivar outputs, as has been achieved in the EMR breeding program several times during the life of that program. Further public investments in North America were directed at developing cold-hardy types in Manitoba and in Wyoming, both programs that have now ceased. Government investment in development of new berry varieties leading to increased berry consumption can also significantly impact public health, especially where the crop is newly introduced. Cultivation is increasing in areas where European and North American red raspberries are not naturally adapted, mainly through the influence of public breeding programs over decades of investment. In Finland, a government initiative for increasing berry consumption reduced problems in the population with heart disease

110

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

and other ailments. With the use of modern chemistry, there is great potential for improving the nutrition of the population in temperate regions worldwide, especially those living in urban environments. Government investment is also important in changing the use and importance of the crop through investment in advertising through television and magazines as well as through food articles and restaurant promotions. Remaining public sector raspberry breeding programs in North America and Europe almost all register their new cultivars for plant patent and/or plant variety rights under the International Union for the Protection of new Varieties of Plants (UPOV), Geneva, Switzerland. While the rewards for successful cultivars are high, many selections elevated to cultivar status do not succeed and make a net loss after investment to register them for worldwide protection, payment of personnel, legal fees, registration fees, and upkeep fees to maintain protection. In many cases, payment for PVR and plant patent protection comes from the same pool of funds that support the breeding program, so overall monies available for breeding may be reduced by pursuit of intellectual property protection. In the private sector, quality of science is at times compromised in the clamor for production of an economically successful cultivar. At least one private program has spread virus infection and other diseases to parts of the world that were clean (L.L. Da Fonseca, pers. comm.). DSA seems to have found the recipe for success for a private raspberry breeding program. DSA does not sell cultivars but retains them and handles the cultivars and fruit production all the way from seedling selection through to supermarkets and other wholesale and retail outlets. Expansion worldwide has been made through agreements with local organizations that assist with the maintaining of intellectual property and manage sales of fruit. Royalties in that program are based on fruit production, bringing a guaranteed return each year back to the research program and to the owners. Several other large companies with production and marketing operations for red raspberry production are developing new cultivars and managing exclusive genetics for the future of their operation. There are several dangers inherent in the current trend to privatization and development of exclusive genetics for a commercial raspberry operation:  Programs developing cultivars and genetics for less productive marginal environments and areas with a smaller population base are being closed.

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

111

 Longer-term objectives, including the use of novel genetics and wild species to improve the germplasm base of raspberries, are being eliminated from breeding programs as they are not economic steps toward the development of new cultivars in current production regions.  Exchange of genetics between programs is reduced, and a few companies are attempting to tie up the genetics from most of the available world raspberry breeding programs.  New cultivars have to be kept from release until trialed in a wide range of environments so that PVR and plant patent applications are not compromised by time constraints for registration in the United States or other countries. This results in a slowing of progress in new cultivar development and is likely to have economic impact on growers and marketers who cannot plant the new types before all legislative hurdles have been crossed. In contrast, if the breeder makes a public disclosure or a sale before international evaluation is carried out, only one year is allowed for filing for protection under United States Plant Patent (USPP). Under UPOV regulations, protection must be filed for within 4–6 years of the first commercialization (Clark et al. 2007). Failure to carry out protection across all these potential growing regions can result in loss of protection in those regions or, at best, needless expenditure on plant protection if the cultivar performance is not satisfactory to the region.  To address this issue, both the UPOV and USPP legislation could easily extend the time available for application for and registration of new cultivars for protection under the laws of different countries. Of particular value would be the establishment of a single legislative body responsible for worldwide registration for plant protection, with reference standard collections kept in multiple locations around the world. Under this body a single fee would be required for international registration, and a database similar to the USPP database would be available so that descriptions of cultivars would be available for all.  Red raspberries are an outcrossing species that perform best when approaching maximum heterozygosity. An examination of the western world’s red raspberry cultivar releases over the last 20 years reveals that 46% of these had a cultivar or selection from another program as one of its parents. In the second generation, 63% had at least one foreign parent; and in the third generation, this number rose to 72%. A further 12% of the selections had unknown or undisclosed origin, but it is likely that they also were

112

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

derived in part from other programs. Thus over 70% and possibly as much as 85% of new cultivar releases have been produced from crosses involving material from outside their own breeding program over the previous three generations of improvement. It appears likely that reduced exchange of plant material could result in considerable reductions in genetic improvement in most of the raspberry breeding programs worldwide.  Large-scale commercial development of raspberries based on a company’s genetics and a reduction in the diversity of cultivars available in the marketplace increases the risk of a single disease or pest making an economic impact on production and sales in the marketplace. Under UPOV, the conditions for granting Plant Variety Rights Protection are:  Novelty. A raspberry variety must not, for more than one year, have been offered for sale or marketed with the consent of the breeder in the country of registration, nor for more than 4–6 years in any other country. Therefore, novelty arises in a commercial sense, not in the sense that the plant is necessarily a ‘‘new’’ development.  Distinctness. The variety must be clearly distinguishable by one or more important characteristics from any other variety whose existence is a matter of common knowledge. (It is or has been the subject of a plant variety right in any country, it is or has been listed in an official register of varieties in any county or that an application for PVR or entrance to an official list is in progress, provided they are granted.)  Stability. The plant must be stable in its essential characteristics, which are the same after each cycle of propagation.  Denomination. The variety must be given a denomination or approved name enabling it to be identified (DEFRA 2005; IPAustralia 2006; Plant variety rights protection in New Zealand 3002). Plant protection will be granted only when the government agency responsible for the granting of rights has determined that the variety fulfills these criteria. The grant of a PVR under the original UPOV (www.upov.int/) charter does not prevent others from:  Growing or using a protected variety for noncommercial purposes

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

113

 Using the plants or parts of the protected variety for human consumption or other nonpropagating purposes  Using a protected variety for the purpose of plant breeding  Using a protected variety for experimental purposes Because the PVR regulations are written separately in each country, the specific wording of regulations in each country varies. In addition, legislation prevents the owner of a variety from obtaining a plant patent in some countries, yet in others separate plant patents are possible and even advised. Protection of a cultivar by PVR is possible to defend in court in some countries; in others it is very difficult, because of differences in legislation. Each country that protects plant variety rights under UPOV/PVR/ PBR regulations requires the submission of applications, technical questionnaires, and objective descriptions, often set out as forms. These forms may be requested from the PVR/PBR office; in some countries they are published on Web sites. With the United States Plant Patents Office, objective description forms are not available, and the required descriptors changes with time and with examiner. Some countries make cultivar descriptions available online but they are not necessarily available as images, as with the USPP Web site. Plant patents in the United States are less formal than the technical questionnaires or objective descriptions under UPOV. However, there has been a considerable increase in information presented for plant patent registration since 1990. This is a double-edged sword for the owner of the patent. On one hand, it will make defending a case where a cultivar has been stolen easier, but on the other hand, it may make it easier for anyone seeking to challenge a patent to proceed, especially if any information is doubtful or wording is incorrect. Interpretation of USPP law by some parties suggests that it may protect the patent owner from the use of his or her genetics by others for breeding, but at this stage this interpretation has not been upheld legally (Clark et al. 2007). However, it is unlikely that this will be possible as an examination of the English in the relevant section in the amended USPP regulations shows a clear connection between the protection and vegetative propagation. Thus the patents do not prevent anyone from using a cultivar for breeding. The current practice of breeders is to continue to use patented cultivars as breeding parents when they are available. Nevertheless, any breeder is free to purchase fruit from a supermarket or other sales outlet to access germplasm. In spite of problems with inbreeding depression, it will be possible to select useful parents for breeding out of the first or second generation of seedlings. In many

114

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

cases, restriction of use of patented cultivars is through honorable or formal agreements between cooperating parties, although formality is becoming more important. Protection of a cultivar limits propagation to those granted permission to do so by the owner or the holder of the rights in that territory. Agreements are negotiated between the rights holder and the propagator for propagation to legally occur. They may be exclusive to a nursery or nonexclusive, allowing multiple propagators for the cultivar. Licensing fees can range from hundreds to tens of thousands of U.S. dollars, depending on the potential popularity of the cultivar, the value of the owner’s intellectual property, territory size, and competition. Many of the cultivars of raspberries given protection under plant variety rights, plant breeder’s rights, and U.S. plant patents have been marketed with royalties on plant sales returning an income to the breeder or the breeder’s employer. However, DSA-Sweetbriar has throughout its history licensed cultivars to growers without selling the plant material and has collected a royalty on fruit sales. This has worked very effectively as the sale of fruit has been managed within the organization. Where the company is licensing material outside of the United States, it is working with vertically integrated organizations that handle both fruit growing and marketing. The practice of royalty collection on fruit sales offers greater returns to the breeder from a cultivar than from plant-based royalties. This practice is likely to increase in future (D.L. Jennings, pers. comm.). Trademark protection of raspberries has not been a common practice but it may be used more effectively in the future, especially when genetics from a breeding program has made marked advances over the competition and when the protection is envisaged to last more than the maximum of 20 years for USPP or up to 30 years under UPOV. In addition, the use of a trademark offers potential for developing an ongoing marque that can be used for generations of new cultivars from a breeding, growing, and marketing organization. Some major raspberry cultivars, such as ‘Meeker’, ‘Heritage’, and ‘Autumn Bliss’, have outlived the lifetime of protection for USPP yet they remain significant cultivars in some parts of the world. It is likely that other cultivars will also show extended life in the future and will be worth the effort of obtaining ongoing protection with a trademark. If simultaneous testing is carried out in several international locations, then the evaluation period may be extended by up to 5 years so that registration for intellectual property rights can be carried out at each location within a 1- to 4-year period without risking the loss of rights and income from the cultivar. Another commercial factor that

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

115

may extend the time from hybridization to release includes waiting until the plant protection on a previous cultivar expires before introducing the new replacement. If there is a significant issue, commercially with an existing cultivar, however—pest, disease, quality problems, or increased competition from a rival cultivar—then the release of a new cultivar may be accelerated. H. Cultivar Release and Commercialization The beginnings of raspberry breeding were in the 19th century when amateurs sought to produce new cultivars for home gardeners, prior to the establishment of commercial production in most parts of the world. Since that time, the majority of raspberry breeding worldwide has focused on the development of new cultivars for the commercial industry in the area to support local growers or establish an industry. However, a small but significant raspberry breeding component has supplied new cultivars for home gardeners and hobby growers. When there were no commercial ties to cultivars the best selections became available for all, but since the establishment of commercialization, secondary selections, or selections with commercial flaws, have been made available to nurseries for home garden, ornamental, or hobby gardener sales. In Germany, for example, one breeder is developing cultivars only for the home garden or ornamental market (H.K. Hall, pers. observ.). In the United Kingdom, ‘Joan J’ sales are almost exclusively to amateur growers; there are no commercial plots of ‘Joan J’ because it does not suit the supermarkets. It darkens quickly and lacks shelf life but is the best for flavor and fruit size (D.L. Jennings, pers. comm.). It is gaining popularity in California, perhaps because the fruits hold up better there, and was reported to be the star attraction at a growers’ meeting in Washington (D.L. Jennings, pers. comm.). The time from hybridization to cultivar release of new raspberry cultivar is usually around 15 years but ranges from 6 to 40 years with the cultivars listed in the ‘‘Brooks and Olmo’’ lists of raspberry cultivars. It can include up to 4 years for seedlings to be: germinated; screened for spinelessness, aphid, or Phytophthora resistance; planted in the field and grown to maturity. Then it can include 1 to 6 years for selection, 2 to 5 years for evaluation of selections, followed by 2 to 5 years of advanced selection testing. Collection of data for intellectual property rights (plant variety rights, plant breeders rights, plant patents and trade marking) obtaining protection from the relevant authorities and bulking of plant material also needs to be carried out before commercial release.

116

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

Many programs carry out DNA fingerprinting in a further effort to reliably identify a cultivar, both for plant protection authorities and to check the identity of cultivars throughout the propagation pathway. Newer techniques at the Rubus Germplasm Repository in Corvallis may also enable a cultivar to be assessed for potentially damaging sports occurring during propagation (N. Bassil, pers. comm.). DNA technology has the potential to eliminate considerable losses for the breeder, nurseryman, and grower, especially if it eliminates mistakes or mutations that result in the production of thousands of atypical plants in tissue culture and in the field. Before the official release of a new cultivar, it is important that propagators produce quantities of high-health, virus-free plant material so that early demand can be filled and the first years of protection are not wasted for bulk of plant material to meet initial sales demand. Production of ample quantities of high-health plants can fulfill a high demand from growers and effective rollout of a new cultivar without costly failures to supply orders and industry dissatisfaction. An outstanding cultivar may offer a potential life longer than the period that plant protection will cover so it is important for market penetration to be at the highest level possible in the years after commercial release. In the United Kingdom and Europe, retail packs of raspberry cultivars are now labeled with the cultivar name (H.A. Daubeny, pers. comm.; H.K. Hall, pers. observ.). This may increase sales of a new cultivar and enable a quicker market penetration driven by the consumer desire for quality and the recognition of a superior product. If naming of fresh-market raspberries in the marketplace becomes widespread, marketing by speciality sales or as ‘‘club’’ cultivars might be considered. I. Propagation When planting a raspberry field, the health status of planting stock used has a tremendous effect on production and profitability in the future. Planting material should be free from pests and virus, bacterial, and fungal diseases (Jenner and Parminter 1981). As raspberry cultivars are all clonal in nature, it is of key importance to make sure that high-health stock that is true to type is used for propagation to ensure high yield and best fruit quality (Bite and Petrevica 2002). Use of fruiting fields as a source of planting stock is unwise, especially older fields that have pest or disease issues. After selections have been clonally propagated and found true to type, they may be recognized and registered as a cultivar.

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

117

Propagation methods used for bulking raspberry clones and propagation issues include:       

Suckers, canes, and transplants Roots Root cuttings and other traditional methods Shoot cuttings In vitro High-health stock and trueness to type Genetic stability

1. Suckers, Canes, and Transplants. The simplest form of propagation of red raspberries is through the use of suckers or canes with attached roots that grow from adventitious buds on the roots of established plants. Multiplication of plants may come from the division of crowns into separate canes from a planting established specifically for propagation. The use of canes dug from the large number of suckers that develop around mother plants in a production field during the first two years of growth is the oldest traditional method of propagation for red raspberries (Crandall and Daubeny 1990; Jenner and Parminter 1981). Excess canes can be dug and transplanted to plant a new field. They are usually dug during the dormant season and either heeled-in in soil or mulch or bagged (prevented from drying out) and held in cold storage until planting. Sometimes foliated canes that have grown in the spring are used, but they require extra care in handling and must be transplanted immediately and kept watered to survive. Obtaining a good stand by using green plants is often difficult; this technique is usually used for small plantings or to fill empty spaces left in new fields (Crandall and Daubeny 1990). Another grade of plant available for sale in the United States is known as a transplant. These are produced by taking suckers, planting them back into a nursery for digging, and selling as crowns after another year’s growth. These are sold into the home garden trade; commercial growers do not find it worthwhile to pay the cost of these plants for field establishment (Funt et al. 1999). Commercial propagators of red raspberries use high-health stock to plant propagation beds. Overwintering canes are dug from the bed after one season’s growth. For the following 1 to 2 summers, cane growth is allowed to spread over the propagation, beds and a crop of high-health canes is dug or lifted during the dormant season (Crandall and Daubeny 1990; Dale 1987). This method is also used to produce long canes for planting high-density greenhouses and tunnels and plantings in warm climate locations for out-of-season production.

118

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

Black raspberries perform differently from red raspberries in that the plants have a tightly formed crown that cannot be broken up like a red raspberry. Suckers also are almost entirely absent, and the plants do not spread from the original crown by suckering. In contrast, canes are arching and are able to tip root in autumn where they touch the ground, and a new crown is formed at that point. When red and black raspberries are intercrossed, the F1 purple raspberries are crown forming. In the F2 seedlings segregate for crown forming, suckering, and tip rooting; some segregates neither sucker nor have the ability to tip root. In backcrosses to red raspberry, the dominant crown-forming trait can be erased from the progenies by selection for suckering, loosecrowned types. 2. Roots. When raspberries are propagated in stool beds, digging of canes produces a large amount of roots that are not attached to canes or crowns. These have adventitious buds, which sucker and grow into young plants. They can be planted to establish a raspberry field or new stool beds. Bud break from roots is highly seasonal with minimal bud break from roots harvested from spring through the summer; roots dug during autumn and winter produce ample adventitious buds (Hudson 1934). With roots from stool beds grown in cool-climate conditions, sucker growth is prolific and establishment of plantings is very good. However, with roots produced in warm temperate conditions and mild winters, bud break from roots is reduced compared to those grown in cool temperate conditions. Even when those roots are planted in a coolclimate nursery, sucker and cane numbers are reduced. If raspberries are grown in subtropical conditions, plants of most cultivars show effects of lack of chill, and fewer root buds are formed. Bud break from roots diminishes rapidly after the first year, until no further growth is observed, usually after 2 to 3 years. Roots are planted as hills using 200 kg/ha (170–230 kg/ha) of roots for hills or 300 kg/ha (280–340 kg/ha) of roots for hedgerow plantings. For hills, 40 to 60 g should be used per hill. In a hedgerow, roots should be placed continuous in the row. Roots should not be allowed to dry out (this happens very quickly on a warm windy spring day), and they should be covered with 2.5 to 4 cm of soil as soon as possible after laying in position (Spooner 2005). 3. Root Cuttings and Other Traditional Methods. A specialized adaptation from the use of roots is used for raspberry propagation in the form of root cuttings (Fig. 22 a–f ). Roots harvested in winter are laid in a propagation tray on a layer of soil mix and then covered with

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

119

Fig. 22. Propagation by root cuttings in raspberry: (A) Roots layered in a tray; (B) Root cutting ready to harvest; (C) Root cuttings after harvest; (D) Root cuttings under mist; (E) Rooted cuttings; (F) Potted cuttings. (photos by H.K. Hall).

2.5 cm of mix. Propagation trays are placed in a greenhouse and kept moist, as would be normal for growing seedlings. Root suckers soon begin to sprout. When they are 1 to 3 cm tall, they are cut using a scalpel and placed in a propagation mix under mist, with or without rooting hormone. Some cultivars benefit from the use of rooting hormones; others root effectively without the need of hormone. Key to rooting is a 2-cm section of stem on the cuttings that has been etiolated. Completely green shoots root less effectively and sometimes not at all. Root cuttings can be very effective in bulking up 1 plant to as many as 300 in a single year without the use of tissue culture. This practice is

120

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

very good for quicker bulk-up for trials of breeding selections (Hudson 1934). For propagation of raspberries for nursery sales to home gardeners, often root cuttings, canes, or tissue-culture plants are used to produce potted plants that are grown on for nursery sales. 4. Shoot Cuttings. The use of primocane cuttings for propagation in early to midsummer is also possible, but results can be variable and often are not successful (Jenner and Parminter 1981; Howard and Tal 1985). Jenner and Parminter (1981) reported some success using a propagation tunnel and cuttings dipped into 0.1% indole butyric acid (IBA) commercially formulated as Seradix No. 1 rooting hormone. Cuttings were placed in a moist 50:50 peat-sand mixture under a plastic tunnel under semishade, sprayed with Captan, and kept enclosed for rooting to take place. Improved results were obtained by Howard and Tal (1985) using tip cuttings from new canes about 60 cm tall and lateral shoots of regrowth about 30 cm long a month later. Cuttings were dipped in 250 mg/l IBA in 50% aqueous acetone to a depth of 8 mm and placed in a 20 C bottom-heated propagation bed under a ventilated, high humidity fogging system. Heavy callus was developed after 14 days, and rooting was observed after 40 days. Pretreatment of cuttings by standing them for 24 hr in 2% sucrose solution reduced basal necrosis overall from 22% to 13% and increased the number of cuttings with large branched root systems from 24% to 55%. A high-peat compost 75:25 peat-sand mix gave higher levels of rooting than the 25:75 mixture. Foliar feed and fungicide sprays were applied twice weekly. With black and purple raspberries, propagation by the use of stem cuttings is much more successful than with red raspberries, as cuttings root quicker and do not die off nearly as much as red raspberries. Successful propagation by root cuttings is closely related to the ability of black raspberries to tip root when cane tips touch the ground and the propensity of canes to root at nodes when pinned to the ground or covered. It may be possible to introgress the dominant easy-rooting trait from black raspberries to red raspberries to reduce propagation difficulties in future. 5. In Vitro. Initial attempts with the use of tissue culture for propagation of red raspberries were only moderately successful (Anderson 1980). Anderson considered it unlikely that red raspberries would be propagated by tissue culture in preference to the use of root cuttings unless it was used to rapidly increase stocks to commercial

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

121

quantities, to maintain germplasm, or to increase disease-free planting stocks. Propagation of blackberries in vitro is much easier and usually quicker than raspberries, but for most cultivars of raspberries tissue culture propagation is viable, and gained greater prominence in the 1980s (Donnelly and Daubeny 1986). Tissue culture propagation is now used routinely in many nurseries and breeding programs around the world. All selections in some larger programs are collected from the field and immediately placed in tissue culture. Any virus and disease infection is cleaned up, and plants can be quickly propagated for largerscale trials. Stocks of high-health material are generated to be used as nuclear stock for further propagation if required. Establishment of cultures is most successful during the springtime. The use of plant material that has been kept in a greenhouse under a fungicide spray program is very beneficial for improving success in getting good initiation and clean cultures. Initiation of cultures as early as possible in spring is very important for primocane-fruiting types so that meristems can be initiated that have not already differentiated to form flower initials. Tissue-culture media successfully used for propagation of raspberries include Linsmaier and Skoog, Murashige and Skoog (MS), Anderson’s, and Lloyd and McCown (Anderson 1980; James et al. 1980; Murashige and Skoog 1962; Pelto and Clark 2000). Tissue-culture laboratories predominantly use indole butyric acid (IBA) as the source of auxin and 6-benzyl-aminopurine (BA) as the cytokinin (Pelto and Clark 2000). Reed (1990) screened 256 accessions of Rubus germplasm for in vitro regeneration and proliferation on MS and Anderson basal salt formulations. Thirty-four percent of these, including 65% of the raspberries, were successfully cultured on Anderson basal salts. Most accessions proliferated on media containing 1 mg/L BA, 0.1 mg/L IBA and 0.1 mg/l GA3; only a few required 2 mg/L BA. Rooting was encouraged in some clones by transferring to full-strength MS medium without plant growth regulators. Ferric ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (FeEDTA) as the source of iron for tissue culture of raspberries is satisfactory in many cases, but some laboratories find that Sequestrene 0.004% as the iron source substantially improves the growth of plants in culture (Gonzalez et al. 2000). Gonzalez et al. (2000) also removed the calcium from Anderson’s macronutrients to promote growth in the raspberry cultivar ‘Gradina’. Growth and rooting of raspberries in vitro is also promoted by adding activated carbon to the medium (Pelto and Clark 2000). With some cultivars, growth was promoted by the use of fructose instead of sucrose

122

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

in the growing medium. Deng and Donnelly (1993) reported the use of CO2-enriched atmosphere and reduced sucrose in the medium for tissue culture of red raspberries and found that it promoted in vitro hardening of the raspberry plantlets. They suggested that CO2 enrichment could be used as an alternative to sucrose for the carbon source for tissue culture. In some laboratories, it is standard to include heat treatment to the protocol of preparing raspberry plant material for culturing. This generally promotes the growth of plants in culture (Donnelly and Daubeny 1986). Growth and multiplication rates of raspberries in culture are significantly reduced by bacterial and virus infection, even if there are no obvious symptoms to either infection (Tsao et al. 2000). In one case a bacterium was systemic in the plant in culture but after plants were ex-flasked, over half of the plants died when they were weaned off mist and hardened off (H.K. Hall, pers. observ.). 6. High-Health Stock and Trueness to Type. Growers are now encouraged to use only certified plant material to establish new plantings. This practice has significantly slowed the deterioration of planting stocks for commercial production of raspberries, as was experienced with many cultivars in the 20th century. ‘Lloyd George’ is an example of a cultivar lost to commercial production through the effects of (RBDV). In the United Kingdom, this cultivar was released in 1920 and became RBDV infected within 10 years. However, it was observed virus free in New Zealand in 1945 and sent back to the United Kingdom as foundation stock for propagation (Hudson 1947), only to be lost again within a short period. ‘Lloyd George’ had an enormous impact on the development of new floricane-fruiting cultivars of red raspberry as well as being the key founding parent for the development of the primocane-fruiting trait. ‘Meeker’, the premier cultivar of the Pacific Northwest for process production, is maintaining its place in production only through the efforts of tissue-culture laboratories and the high-health certification programs in the United States and Canada. Nevertheless, the period of production for ‘Meeker’ before the plants become RBDV infected and commercially unacceptable has dropped to as little as 5 years in some plantings (H.K. Hall, pers. observ.). In New Zealand, plants of ‘Marcy’ widely planted in former years were uniformly infected with RBDV. This infection was spread throughout the country by the practice of using production fields as the source of plants for new fields. In addition, the disease Silver leaf (Chondrostereum purpureum ¼ Stereum purpureum) was also shipped

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

123

to other planting sites, as were crown gall and other diseases (H.K. Hall, pers. observ.). For high-health nuclear stock production and maintenance, plants are virus tested, heat treated, and cleared of virus before being multiplied by tissue culture and supplied as certified mother material for propagation. After tissue-cultured plants are grown out, they are typically increased for two generations of propagation in the field before being sold as certified plants, providing they have passed the required inspections for trueness to type and freedom from weeds and other issues in the propagation fields. A mix-up in the tissue culture laboratory or in the field is very serious for a commercial nursery, and it can cause significant problems for both the nurseryman and for the grower if it has not been recognized during the certification process. This was a significant issue in the United Kingdom when ‘Glen Shee’ and ‘Glen Ample’ were mixed up in propagation (Glens mix-up cost to raspberry 1999). In the Pacific Northwest, ‘Meeker’ was found to be contaminated in one nursery, and it required a significant effort to remove less than 1% contamination with ‘Willamette’ in the field so that the plants could be certified and sold (H.K. Hall, pers. observ.). In trial plots of another nursery in the same area, selections under trial were mislabeled and there were several mix-ups in plots of at least two successive trials. At EMR there has been an ongoing battle with the resistance-breaking strain of RBDV (RB-RBDV) in trial plots and in breeding fields. It is a testament to the efforts in high-health management for propagation that this disease has not been spread abroad from their trial fields. 7. Genetic Stability. Mutations also are an area of concern for breeders, tissue culture propagators, nurserymen and growers. Genetic instability in raspberries is relatively common, and aberrant types are found in every cultivar that has been bulked up for large-scale commercial plantings. Most of the aberrations in plant growth are inconsequential as they occur in single plants in the field; for example, single or even some multiple cane mutants with genetic chlorosis are found at a low level among plantings. Another common mutant is for yellow- or gold-fruited mutants, especially in those cultivars with the recessive gene for yellow fruit color. Six cultivars that contain the recessive yellow gene i are ‘Autumn Bliss’, ‘Cuthbert’, ‘Heritage’, ‘Indian Summer’, ‘Meeker’, and ‘Willamette’. Each of these has produced sports with yellow-golden fruit, and several of them have been released as cultivars. From ‘Autumn Bliss’ has come ‘Golden Bliss’ (‘Allgold’ in the United Kingdom); from

124

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

Cuthbert have come ‘Golden Queen’ and ‘Perry Golden’; from ‘Heritage’ have come ‘Goldie’ and ‘Kiwigold’; from ‘Indian Summer’ has come ‘New York Times’; from ‘Meeker’ have come several golden selections, one of which have been released as the commercial cultivar ‘Lisa’ (Nikolic´ and Milivojevic´ 2008); and from ‘Willamette’ has come ‘Better Homes and Gardens’. A yellow sport of ‘Malling Delight’ also was maintained at SCRI for some time but now has been lost (D.L. Jennings, pers. comm.). Other cultivars with the recessive yellow gene include ‘Lloyd George’, ‘Sumner’, ‘Chilcotin’, ‘Lewis’, ‘Tadmor’, and ‘Fairview’. Several cultivars have also mutated to become genetically spineless, including ‘Willamette’, ‘Zefa 2’, and ‘Multiraspa’, resulting in clones that have dominant spinelessness. However, no breeding value has been found with this material. Another mutation of potential value is the mutations of ‘Malling Jewel’ and ‘Malling Promise’ to give plants with the dominant gene L1, affecting fruiting laterals and stimulating the production of very large sepals, stipules, and fruit (Jennings 1993). This gene was used in breeding in Scotland (SCRI), England (EMR), Canada (PARC-BC), the United States (WSU, ORUS), Russia, and New Zealand. The cultivar ‘Glen Garry’ was been released from SCRI containing gene L1 as well as a range of cultivars from Russia (Kichina 2005b). Use of gene L1 types for breeding has been abandoned in most locations because of genetic instability. In spite of instability, some selections with the reverted gene have been very valuable for breeding and also of commercial potential. In Russia, one gene L1 selection derived from the large-fruited types with this gene from Scotland has been released as the cultivar ‘Generalissimos’, with fruit up to 23 g in weight (Fadjukov 2003). A photograph of this cultivar (http://www. eco-rus.info/text/poselenia/posrast/posraysad1.htm) shows that the plant has some appearance of tetraploidy. It will spark considerable interest for raspberry breeders. Genetic stability in propagation is of greater importance than within commercial fields, assuming plants have been true to type when set in the field. Mutation rates in commercial fields may be as high as 0.05% to 0.1% or higher (Kichina and Ogoltzova 1973, 1975), and similar rates of genetic change may be expected in propagation fields. In propagation fields, genetic stability becomes more important when there are two or more generations of propagation before plants are fruited and checked for trueness to type (Jennings 1993). However, if plants are inspected by trained personnel, aberrant types may be rogued before plants are sold, as variation in morphology often signals changes that will affect fruit quality and production. If tissue culture is used for bulking plant material before plants are set in a field nursery, there is a significantly

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

125

greater likelihood of undetected mutations arising in a cultivar or selection (Jennings 1993). When adventitious buds are propagated in tissue culture, rather than apical or axillary meristems, the risk is increased significantly, as there is greater genetic variation when new buds are generated within callus or around the base of a shoot. In New Zealand, this was observed when tissue culture was used to bulk up ‘Tadmor’ raspberry for commercial propagation. ‘Tadmor’ itself was slow to grow in culture and difficult to get numbers required for the order. In one subculture, multiplication increased significantly, and this eventually comprised much of the order. Differences between the somaclonal variant and ‘Tadmor’ included earliness, very spiny canes, greater cane numbers, extremely vigorous spreading growth, leafiness, soft rough fruit that were very susceptible to fruit rots, and hard to pick. (‘Tadmor’ was semispineless, had a moderate number of upright canes and open bush habit. Fruit was large, firm, well formed, had good shelf life, easy to harvest, and the harvest season was very late). When the tissue-cultured plants were placed in the field, the somaclonal variant produced many canes. These were dug for further plantings, making the new fields almost entirely the aberrant type. Particular problems have frequently occurred in propagation with plants mutating to produce crumbly fruit (Daubeny et al. 1967; Jennings 1967b, 1993; P.P. Moore and Robbins 1990). At WSU, plant material of ‘Sumner’ and ‘Centennial’ became crumbly during the propagation process, and in the United Kingdom, ‘Malling Promise’, ‘Norfolk Giant’, and ‘Malling Jewel’ showed similar effects in some propagation lines. Crumbly fruited clones were a significant problem for propagators. In propagation, it is important to devise a protocol that tracks different lines of a selection or cultivar so that the likelihood of significant commercial loss can be reduced. If a problem occurs within a propagation line, this means that only part of the multiplication will be affected rather than the whole of that clone. In tissue culture, both the time a plant is maintained in culture before reinitiation and the number of generations of subculturing should be recorded. A regular program of reinitiation should be maintained to reduce the risk of propagation problems occurring in culture and taking over the whole of the propagation of a clone. Efforts should be made to avoid using adventitious buds for tissue culture propagation in culture, and a regular program of sampling should be followed to progeny-test the propagules coming from each initiation and each propagation line. When tissue culture propagation lines are moved into a nursery, tracking of propagation lines should be continued so that a problem

126

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

line can be removed or targeted for rouging, rather than requiring the whole propagation field or total of one selection or cultivar to be subjected to culling or rouging. J. Molecular Techniques The advent of biotechnology has resulted in a fundamental shift in detecting and monitoring genetic variation in plant breeding and genetic studies (C.A. Weber, pers. observ.). Classical breeding, which selects parents and their desirable offspring based on an observable phenotype, is being integrated with techniques that can identify and manage genetic variability at the molecular level (protein or DNA). The ability to detect genome-wide variability has led to the characterization of genetic variation within not only coding regions (i.e., genes and their morphological manifestations) but also in noncoding regions, which make up large portions of plant genomes. These developments have enabled the construction of genetic linkage maps of red raspberry containing numerous genetic markers that are phenotypically neutral, which have been used to identify genomic regions associated with phenotype. Additionally, methods to transform or genetically modify plants have the potential to provide practically unlimited variation to plant breeders. Progress in genetic modification is limited more by rates of gene discovery, intellectual property issues, and public preferences than by the techniques used to modify genomes. A variety of molecular marker techniques including isozymes, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), simple sequence repeats (SSR), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and others, have been employed in genetic studies of raspberry. Most studies have been for (1) detecting and quantifying genetic variation at the DNA level; (2) determining taxonomic relationships; and (3) locating genetic loci controlling a trait(s) for marker-assisted selection (MAS) and/or for novel gene discovery from exotic germplasm. Techniques for genetic modification have been successfully modified from other species for use in raspberry, and there is every reason to believe future applications will be successful as well. The next section reviews the application of molecular techniques in the genetic studies of cultivated raspberry (R. idaeus, R. arcticus, and R. occidentalis) as well as other Rubus species with raspberry-type fruit (i.e., fruit separates from the receptacle at maturity). 1. Diversity and Taxonomy. Many studies have utilized molecular markers to quantify genetic diversity in wild raspberry populations as

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

127

well as among breeding programs and cultivars. Further use has been made in classifying that diversity and elucidating the relationships among the many hundreds of Rubus species. Early work with starch gel electrophoresis and isozyme staining demonstrated their utility in detecting variation in Rubus species. Naruhashi and Masuda (1986) showed that peroxidase staining patterns varied among many Rubus species including several raspberry types, as well as among tissues of different ages within each species. They also noted patterns corresponded broadly to cane and leaf patterns hinting at the possibility of genetic mapping using isozymes. Patamsyte˙ et al. (2004) analyzed the correlation between soil acidity and the isozyme pattern of superoxide dismutase (SOD) among 20 wild R. idaeus genotypes but found no relationship. DNA fingerprinting techniques have also been utilized to investigate diversity and population dynamics in raspberry. Nybom and Schaal (1990) developed fingerprints with a radioactive minisatellite probe in black raspberry. Tandem repeats of a core sequence were highly variable within a black raspberry population, identifying 15 genotypes in a sample of 20 individuals. P.P. Moore (1993a) probed restricted DNA from 22 red and purple raspberry genotypes with sequences from a chloroplast library to investigate maternal ancestry. Maternal ancestry from R. occidentalis, R. parvifolius, and R. strigosus could be differentiated from R. idaeus vulgatus Arrhen., from which arose all of the commercial red raspberry cultivars in the study. Random amplified polymorphic markers have been used widely in raspberry for taxonomic studies (Graham and McNicol 1995; Pamfil et al. 1997, 2000; Trople and P.P. Moore 1999) and germplasm diversity assessments (Badjakov et al. 2006; Graham et al. 1994, 1997, 2003; Patamsyte˙ et al. 2004; Weber 2003). Graham et al. (1994) used the distribution of markers from nine RAPD primers to produce a similarity index and a hierarchical tree for 10 red raspberry cultivars. Graham and McNicol (1995) used RAPDs to elucidate relationships among 13 Rubus species including seven raspberry types. A principle coordinate analysis and similarity index showed divergence in the presumed taxonomic relationships among these species. Trople and P.P. Moore (1999) calculated genetic similarities among 43 Rubus species, including multiple raspberry types, based on marker profiles from six RAPD primers. The similarity indices were relatively low between various species (0.15 to 0.52) with much higher indices within species with multiple accessions (0.62 to 0.82). Pamfil et al. (2000) analyzed 40 species of Rubus, including many raspberry types, in relation to success of interspecific hybridization. Classification of the species

128

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

using RAPD markers agreed with the traditional classification of Rubus in most cases, except for three species in the subgenus Malachobatus that clustered with the raspberry types in subgenus Idaeobatus and the reverse of this relationship for one species. However, RAPD-based taxonomy could not explain the success of interspecific hybridization within each subgenus. In other work, Graham et al. (1997) used RAPD markers to examine relationships and spatial diversity in wild populations of R. idaeus in Scotland. Wild accessions from four sites were compared to each other and the commercial cultivar ‘Glen Clova’ using six RAPD primers. Most of the variability in markers was observed between the collection sites. Within sites, increasing diversity coincided with greater spatial separation. None of the wild populations was closely related to the commercial cultivar. Later, Graham et al. (2003) assayed a wider range of wild R. idaeus from 12 sites across a greater area of the United Kingdom and compared the accessions to the cultivar ‘Glen Moy’. Again, greater genetic similarity was found within each population collected, which indicates limited of gene movement across geographic locations. Additionally, little gene flow was observed between wild populations and commercial cultivars. Gene flow within and between these wild populations was subsequently studied using SSR markers, which confirmed limited gene flow (J. Graham, pers. comm.). Patamsyte˙ et al. (2004) analyzed 20 wild R. idaeus accessions from a Lithuanian germplasm collection for genetic diversity using 285 RAPD loci produced from 36 primers. Genetic distances among the genotypes did not correlate to geographic distances between collection sites. When ecological conditions were analyzed in comparison to the RAPD marker, soil acidity was significantly correlated to observed polymorphisms, indicating an environmental effect on diversity within populations. Badjakov et al. (2006) analyzed 28 raspberry genotypes from the Bulgarian germplasm collection including 18 Bulgarian cultivars and breeding lines, 8 accessions from outside Bulgaria and two wild species accessions, R. occidentalis and R. adiene. A set of four RAPD primers generated markers used to create a genetic similarity tree. Two clusters were clearly visible among the Bulgarian genotypes, which corresponded to two pedigree groups. Weber (2003) analyzed the genetic relationship among and between black raspberry (R. occidentalis), red raspberry, and a blackberry hybrid genotype using RAPD markers. Black raspberry genotypes showed an 81% genetic similarity with the 11 least variable black raspberry genotypes being 92% similar. This compared to 70% similarity measured among red raspberry cultivars (Graham et al. 1994). Five

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

129

genotypes accounted for 58% of the observed variability in black raspberry. Of the 16 genotypes investigated, none was more than two generations from at least one wild ancestor, further indicating a lack of genetic variability in black raspberry cultivars. The development of molecular markers has been driven by the need for saturated maps for breeding and gene function studies. Amplified fragment length polymorphisms combine the hypervariability of restriction site polymorphisms seen in restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) with the ease of PCR-based reactions. This marker type has been used to investigate diversity and population dynamics in multiple Rubus species. Amsellem et al. (2000) investigated the diversity of the weedy raspberry species R. alceifolius Poir. in its native range and in areas where it has invaded as a noxious weed. Considerably more genetic diversity was detected in its native range, with diversity in nonnative ranges dependent on distance from the origin. Multiple introduction sites could be identified in some cases based on marker profiles from different populations. Amsellem et al. (2001c) also used AFLP to show that reproduction in the native range of R. alceifolius is through sexual means and through apomixis in introduced locations. Lindqvist-Kreuze et al. (2003) also used AFLP markers to characterize diversity in 6 populations of wild Arctic raspberry (R. arcticus L.) and 10 cultivars in Finland. AFLPs produced a multitude of markers able to distinguish 78 genotypes from 122 samples. Genetic variation was high within populations, indicating a high degree of sexual reproduction, but interpopulation gene flow was low as measured by overall diversity among locations. Diversity within the cultivars was also high to the point of being able to differentiate subspecies. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) or microsatellite markers have also been developed for Rubus to catalog the hypervariable microsatellite regions of the genome. Amsellem et al. (2001b) demonstrated their utility in the weedy species R. alceifolius for looking at diversity over native and invasive ranges as well as for tracking interspecific hybridization among overlapping Rubus species. Amsellem et al. (2001a) also used SSR markers to show that reproduction within its native range was sexual while apomixis was common in nonnative locations. Polymorphic microsatellite loci have been used as a tool to investigate gene flow between cultivated and wild raspberry (2002). Badjakov et al. (2006) also used SSR markers to assess the genetic diversity in Bulgarian germplasm accessions. Twenty-eight accessions were screened at four SSR loci, demonstrating high levels of diversity within the collection.

130

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

Various other molecular marker systems have been used to quantify diversity in raspberry species including variable number tandem repeats (VNTR) and internal transcribed spacer region (ITSR) polymorphisms. Busemeyer et al. (1997) utilized DNA probes from two repeated core sequences to examine diversity at VNTR loci in the wild populations of R. moluccanus L. in the Philippines. The results were similar to that of Graham et al. (1997, 2003) with more similarity found within populations at each location than that found between location. Additionally, apomictic reproduction was ruled out in these populations because no identical VNTR patterns were identified. Alice and Campbell (1999) produced a Rubus phylogeny of 57 species including multiple raspberry species based on variability in the ITSR sequences. ITSR sequences were found to be generally consistent with biogeography and ploidy levels but less so with morphological traits. 2. Cultivar Identification. Multiple marker systems have been used for cultivar and breeding selection identification. Cousineau and Donnelly (1989a,b, 1992b) analyzed six isozymes to characterize 79 red, black, and purple (R: idaeus  R: occidentalis) raspberry cultivars and breeding selections and were able to detect mislabeling among plant sources. However, 24 of these genotypes could not be uniquely characterized using these isozymes. RAPDs have also been utilized in many Rubus species for cultivar identification (Graham et al. 1994; P.P. Moore 1995; Parent et al. 1993; Weber 2003). Parent et al. (1993) tested 19 primers on 15 red and purple raspberry cultivars and found a combination of 3 primers produced markers that could differentiate all of the cultivars in the study. In a similar study, Graham et al. (1994) produced specific RAPD fingerprints for 10 red raspberry cultivars using 9 random primers. In black raspberry, Weber (2003) found that the marker profile from 6 RAPD primers could be used to differentiate 16 cultivars and selections. RAPD marker-derived sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers were also develop for cultivar identification by Parent and Page (1998). Five RAPD markers were cloned and sequenced for development of SCAR markers with 4 producing polymorphisms useful for identifying 15 purple and red raspberry cultivars. Other marker systems have also been used in cultivar identification, including variation in intersimple sequence repeat (ISSR) sequences and minisatellite DNA fingerprints. Sobolev et al. (2006) used ISSR markers that can identify variation in the DNA between SSR areas of the genome to identify Russian raspberry cultivars. Nybom et al. (1989) probed restricted DNA from 10 raspberry cultivars for minisatellite

2. RASPBERRY BREEDING AND GENETICS

131

sequence variation to produce cultivar-specific DNA fragment profiles that could identify each cultivar. Similarly, Nybom et al. (1989) and Nybom and Hall (1991) probed 6 black and red raspberry genotypes and other Rubus samples to produce cultivar-specific DNA fragment profiles. Estimates of similarity based on fragment profiles coincided strongly with genetic relatedness based on pedigree analysis. Parent and Page (1992) utilized nonradioactive minisatellite probes to produce DNA fingerprints, producing unique fingerprints for 15 purple and red raspberry cultivars. Castillo et al. (2007) examined genetic stability of cultivars after in vitro culture and cryopreservation using SSR and AFLP markers. Bassil is documenting SSR fingerprints of standard cultivars with DNA extracted from young leaves. In addition, her laboratory has been successful at extracting DNA and analyzing SSR cultivar identity from Rubus receptacles and fruit (N. Bassil, pers. comm.). 3. Inheritance and Genetic Mapping. Prior to the advent of molecular markers, inheritance and genetic mapping studies were limited to simple morphological traits (Jennings 1988; Ourecky 1975a). The development of various marker systems has made whole genome mapping possible and aided in the study of inheritance of more complex or quantitative traits. Cousineau and Donnelly (1992a) studied the inheritance of five isozymes in 15 red and purple raspberry F1 progenies. Deviations from Mendelian inheritance were observed in three of four populations for the isocitrate dehydrogenase (Ihd-1) locus and higher than expected aberrant segregation ratios for four other isozymes. Analysis of jointly segregating loci revealed a possible linkage group consisting of the malate dehydrogenase (Mdh-1), triose phosphate isomerase (Tpi-2), and phosphoglucomutase (Pmg-1) loci. SSR markers have also proven to be useful in genetic mapping of Rubus. Stafne et al. (2005) tested 142 SSR markers developed from Rubus and Fragaria L. (strawberry) on raspberry and blackberry parental genotypes to assess their utility in genetic mapping. In raspberry, 60 SSR primer pairs were found to have potential for mapping. Lewers et al. (2005) developed SSR markers from GenBank sequences from related species in the Rosaceae and from a genomic strawberry library. Development of SSR makers was not efficient outside the closely related genera in the Rosoidae subfamily and only moderately useful within the sub-amily with poor transference among species. The first genetic map of raspberry was developed by Graham et al. (2004) utilizing SSR and AFLP markers for a population of ‘Glen Moy’ 

132

HARVEY K. HALL, ET AL.

‘Latham’. SSR markers were developed from both genomic and cDNA libraries from the cultivar ‘Glen Moy’, and AFLP markers further saturated the map for quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis for complex morphological traits. A genetic linkage map was produced consisting of nine linkage groups with 273 markers covering 789 cM of map distance. QTL analysis for variability in spine density identified two associated regions on linkage group 2. Analysis of the production and spread of root suckers identified two regions on linkage group 8 associated with the spread of root suckers from the mother plant and one similar region associated with sucker production. Graham et al. (2006) later added 20 SSR markers to the ‘Glen Moy’  ‘Latham’ map along with analyzing data on the H gene for cane hairiness and resistance to multiple fungal pathogens. The H gene was mapped to linkage group 2 and associated closely with resistance to cane Botrytis and spur blight. Resistance to cane spot was mapped to a different region of linkage group 2 and linkage group 4, and yellow rust resistance was mapped to linkage group 5. Root rot resistance has also been mapped in this ‘Latham’  ‘Glen Moy’ cross, with QTL on two linkage groups (J. Graham, pers. comm.). Pattison et al. (2007) combined generational means analysis with molecular markers and QTL analysis to map resistance to Phytophthora root rot in a BC1 population of NY00-34 (‘Titan’  ‘Latham’)  ‘Titan’. Separate genetic linkage maps of NY00-34 and ‘Titan’ were developed using RAPD, AFLP, and resistance gene analog polymorphisms (RGAP) and analyzed for QTL associated with various parameters of root rot resistance assayed in a hydroponic system (Pattison et al. 2004). Regions on linkage groups 1, 5 and 7 were associated in multiple parameters of the resistance response. Bulked segregant analysis (BSA) corroborated this conclusion by identifying markers from these regions associated with bulked samples of resistant and susceptible genotypes. Generational means analysis suggests two major genes controlling resistance, possibly corresponding to the two regions on each parental linkage map associated with resistance. Attempts to develop markers for other viral resistance genes have been carried out for raspberry leaf spot and raspberry vein chlorosis utilizing the ‘Glen Moy’  ‘Latham’ cross of Graham et a