Heat and Mass Transfer, 3rd Edition

Heat and Mass Transfer • Hans Dieter Baehr Karl Stephan Heat and Mass Transfer Third, revised edition With 343...

Author: Hans Dieter Baehr | Karl Stephan

908 downloads 3855 Views 11MB Size Report

This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!

Report copyright / DMCA form

DOWNLOAD PDF

Heat and Mass Transfer

•

Hans Dieter Baehr

Karl Stephan

Heat and Mass Transfer Third, revised edition With 343 Figures, Many Worked Examples and Exercises

123

Dr.-Ing. E.h. Dr.-Ing. Hans Dieter Baehr Professor em. of Thermodynamics University of Hannover Germany

Dr.-Ing. E.h. mult. Dr.-Ing. Karl Stephan Professor em. Institute of Thermodynamics and Thermal Process Engineering University of Stuttgart 70550 Stuttgart Germany [email protected]

ISBN 978-3-642-20020-5 e-ISBN 978-3-642-20021-2 DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-20021-2 Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2011934036 c Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: SPi Publisher Services Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com)

Preface to the third edition

In this edition of our book we still retained its concept: The main emphasis is placed on the fundamental principles of heat and mass transfer and their application to practical problems of process modelling and apparatus design. Like the previous editions, the third edition contains ﬁve chapters and several appendices, particularly a compilation of thermophysical property data needed for the solution of problems. In this third edition the text has been expanded to include recent developments. In chapter 2 on “Numerical solution to heat conduction problems” we added now an introduction into the numerical solution of heat conduction problems with the method of Finite Elements. It shall familiarise the student with the principles of the method, so that he will be able to solve basic problems by himself. For the solution of more complicated problems it is advisable to make use of one of the many programs available either commercially or on the Internet. The acquired knowledge will help to do so. The chapter 3 on “Convective heat and mass transfer, Single phase ﬂow” was thoroughly revised. It is now complemented by a chapter on heat and mass transfer in porous bodies. In chapter 4 the subchapter explaining the phenomena of the mechanism of boiling heat transfer was revised. It presents now the recent state of our knowledge in the ﬁeld. As in the previous editions changes were made in those chapters presenting heat and mass transfer correlations based on theoretical results or experimental ﬁndings. They were adapted to the most recent state of our knowledge. Also the compilation of the thermophysical properties, needed to solve heat and mass transfer problems, was revised and adapted to our present knowledge. As a consequence many of the worked examples and exercises had to be updated with the new thermophysical properties. The list of references was updated as well, including recent publications in the ﬁeld. The worked examples not only illustrate the application of the theory, but are also relevant for apparatus design. Solving the exercises is essential for a sound understanding and for relating principles to real engineering situations. Numerical answers and hints to the solution of the exercises are given in the ﬁnal appendix. The new edition also presented an opportunity to correct printing errors and mistakes.

vi

Preface

In preparing this edition we were assisted by Annika Zeitz and Sebastian Asenbeck, who helped us to submit a printable version of the manuscript to the publisher. We owe them sincere thanks. We also appreciate the eﬀorts of friends and colleagues who provided their good advice with constructive suggestions. Particular thanks are due to Dr. Arno Laesecke at the National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST), Boulder, Colorado, USA.

Bochum and Stuttgart, April 2011

H.D. Baehr K. Stephan

•

Preface to the first edition

This book is the English translation of our German publication, which appeared in 1994 with the title “W¨arme und Stoﬀ¨ ubertragung” (7th edition Berlin: SpringerVerlag 2010). The German version originated from lecture courses in heat and mass transfer which we have held for many years at the Universities of Hannover and Stuttgart, respectively. Our book is intended for students of mechanical and chemical engineering at universities and engineering schools, but will also be of use to students of other subjects such as electrical engineering, physics and chemistry. Firstly our book should be used as a textbook alongside the lecture course. Its intention is to make the student familiar with the fundamentals of heat and mass transfer, and enable him to solve practical problems. On the other hand we placed special emphasis on a systematic development of the theory of heat and mass transfer and gave extensive discussions of the essential solution methods for heat and mass transfer problems. Therefore the book will also serve in the advanced training of practising engineers and scientists and as a reference work for the solution of their tasks. The material is explained with the assistance of a large number of calculated examples, and at the end of each chapter a series of exercises is given. This should also make self study easier. Many heat and mass transfer problems can be solved using the balance equations and the heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients, without requiring too deep a knowledge of the theory of heat and mass transfer. Such problems are dealt with in the ﬁrst chapter, which contains the basic concepts and fundamental laws of heat and mass transfer. The student obtains an overview of the diﬀerent modes of heat and mass transfer, and learns at an early stage how to solve practical problems and to design heat and mass transfer apparatus. This increases the motivation to study the theory more closely, which is the object of the subsequent chapters. In the second chapter we consider steady-state and transient heat conduction and mass diﬀusion in quiescent media. The fundamental diﬀerential equations for the calculation of temperature ﬁelds are derived here. We show how analytical and numerical methods are used in the solution of practical cases. Alongside the Laplace transformation and the classical method of separating the variables, we have also presented an extensive discussion of ﬁnite diﬀerence methods which are very important in practice. Many of the results found for heat conduction can be transferred to the analogous process of mass diﬀusion. The mathematical solution formulations are the same for both ﬁelds.

Preface

ix

The third chapter covers convective heat and mass transfer. The derivation of the mass, momentum and energy balance equations for pure ﬂuids and multicomponent mixtures are treated ﬁrst, before the material laws are introduced and the partial diﬀerential equations for the velocity, temperature and concentration ﬁelds are derived. As typical applications we consider heat and mass transfer in ﬂow over bodies and through channels, in packed and ﬂuidised beds as well as free convection and the superposition of free and forced convection. Finally an introduction to heat transfer in compressible ﬂuids is presented. In the fourth chapter the heat and mass transfer in condensation and boiling with free and forced ﬂows is dealt with. The presentation follows the book, “Heat Transfer in Condensation and Boiling” (Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1992) by K. Stephan. Here, we consider not only pure substances; condensation and boiling in mixtures of substances are also explained to an adequate extent. Thermal radiation is the subject of the ﬁfth chapter. It diﬀers from many other presentations in so far as the physical quantities needed for the quantitative description of the directional and wavelength dependency of radiation are extensively presented ﬁrst. Only after a strict formulation of Kirchhoﬀ’s law, the ideal radiator, the black body, is introduced. After this follows a discussion of the material laws of real radiators. Solar radiation and heat transfer by radiation are considered as the main applications. An introduction to gas radiation, important technically for combustion chambers and furnaces, is the ﬁnal part of this chapter. As heat and mass transfer is a subject taught at a level where students have already had courses in calculus, we have presumed a knowledge of this ﬁeld. Those readers who only wish to understand the basic concepts and become familiar with simple technical applications of heat and mass transfer need only study the ﬁrst chapter. More extensive knowledge of the subject is expected of graduate mechanical and chemical engineers. The mechanical engineer should be familiar with the fundamentals of heat conduction, convective heat transfer and radiative transfer, as well as having a basic knowledge of mass transfer. Chemical engineers also require, in addition to a sound knowledge of these areas, a good understanding of heat and mass transfer in multiphase ﬂows. The time set aside for lectures is generally insuﬃcient for the treatment of all the material in this book. However, it is important that the student acquires a broad understanding of the fundamentals and methods. Then it is suﬃcient to deepen this knowledge with selected examples and thereby improve problem solving skills. In the preparation of the manuscript we were assisted by a number of our colleagues, above all by Nicola Jane Park, MEng., University of London, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine. We owe her sincere thanks for the translation of our German publication into English, and for the excellent cooperation.

Hannover and Stuttgart, Spring 1998

H.D. Baehr K. Stephan

Contents

Nomenclature

xviii

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

1

1.1 The diﬀerent types of heat transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1.1 Heat conduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1.2 Steady, one-dimensional conduction of heat . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1.3 Convective heat transfer. Heat transfer coeﬃcient . . . . . . . 1.1.4 Determining heat transfer coeﬃcients. Dimensionless numbers 1.1.5 Thermal radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1.6 Radiative exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . .

. . . . . . .

1 2 5 10 15 25 27

1.2 Overall heat transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2.1 The overall heat transfer coeﬃcient . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2.2 Multi-layer walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2.3 Overall heat transfer through walls with extended surfaces 1.2.4 Heating and cooling of thin walled vessels . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

31 31 33 34 38

1.3 Heat exchangers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3.1 Types of heat exchanger and ﬂow conﬁgurations . . . . . . . . . . 1.3.2 General design equations. Dimensionless groups . . . . . . . . . . 1.3.3 Countercurrent and cocurrent heat exchangers . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3.4 Crossﬂow heat exchangers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3.5 Operating characteristics of further ﬂow conﬁgurations. Diagrams

40 41 45 50 57 64

1.4 The diﬀerent types of mass transfer . . . 1.4.1 Diﬀusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.4.1.1 Composition of mixtures . 1.4.1.2 Diﬀusive ﬂuxes . . . . . . 1.4.1.3 Fick’s law . . . . . . . . . 1.4.2 Diﬀusion through a semipermeable 1.4.3 Convective mass transfer . . . . . 1.5 Mass 1.5.1 1.5.2 1.5.3 1.5.4

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . plane. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equimolar diﬀusion . . . . . . . . . . . .

transfer theories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Film theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Boundary layer theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Penetration and surface renewal theories . . . . Application of ﬁlm theory to evaporative cooling

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . . . .

. . . . . . .

65 67 67 68 71 73 77

. . . . .

. . . . .

81 81 85 87 88

Contents

xi

1.6 Overall mass transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

92

1.7 Mass transfer apparatus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.7.1 Material balances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.7.2 Concentration proﬁles and heights of mass transfer columns . . . .

94 95 98

1.8 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

107

2.1 The heat conduction equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1.1 Derivation of the diﬀerential equation for the temperature 2.1.2 The heat conduction equation for bodies with constant material properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1.3 Boundary conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1.4 Temperature dependent material properties . . . . . . . . 2.1.5 Similar temperature ﬁelds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . 107 ﬁeld . . 108 . . . .

. . . .

. . . .

111 113 116 117

. . . . . sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

121 121 124 129 133 136 137 141

2.3 Transient heat conduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.1 Solution methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.2 The Laplace transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.3 The semi-inﬁnite solid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.3.1 Heating and cooling with diﬀerent boundary conditions 2.3.3.2 Two semi-inﬁnite bodies in contact with each other . . . 2.3.3.3 Periodic temperature variations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.4 Cooling or heating of simple bodies in one-dimensional heat ﬂow 2.3.4.1 Formulation of the problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.4.2 Separating the variables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.4.3 Results for the plate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.4.4 Results for the cylinder and the sphere . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.4.5 Approximation for large times: Restriction to the ﬁrst term in the series . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.4.6 A solution for small times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.5 Cooling and heating in multi-dimensional heat ﬂow . . . . . . . 2.3.5.1 Product solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.5.2 Approximation for small Biot numbers . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.6 Solidiﬁcation of geometrically simple bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.6.1 The solidiﬁcation of ﬂat layers (Stefan problem) . . . . . 2.3.6.2 The quasi-steady approximation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.6.3 Improved approximations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.7 Heat sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . .

142 143 144 151 151 156 158 161 161 163 165 169

. . . . . . . . . .

171 173 174 175 178 179 180 183 186 187

2.2 Steady-state heat conduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2.1 Geometric one-dimensional heat conduction with heat 2.2.2 Longitudinal heat conduction in a rod . . . . . . . . . 2.2.3 The temperature distribution in ﬁns and pins . . . . . 2.2.4 Fin eﬃciency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2.5 Geometric multi-dimensional heat ﬂow . . . . . . . . . 2.2.5.1 Superposition of heat sources and heat sinks . 2.2.5.2 Shape factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . .

. . . .

xii

Contents

2.3.7.1 Homogeneous heat sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 2.3.7.2 Point and linear heat sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189 2.4 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with diﬀerence methods 2.4.1 The simple, explicit diﬀerence method for transient heat conduction problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4.1.1 The ﬁnite diﬀerence equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4.1.2 The stability condition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4.1.3 Heat sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4.2 Discretisation of the boundary conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4.3 The implicit diﬀerence method from J. Crank and P. Nicolson . . 2.4.4 Noncartesian coordinates. Temperature dependent material properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4.4.1 The discretisation of the self-adjoint diﬀerential operator . 2.4.4.2 Constant material properties. Cylindrical coordinates . . 2.4.4.3 Temperature dependent material properties . . . . . . . . 2.4.5 Transient two- and three-dimensional temperature ﬁelds . . . . . . 2.4.6 Steady-state temperature ﬁelds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4.6.1 A simple ﬁnite diﬀerence method for plane, steady-state temperature ﬁelds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4.6.2 Consideration of the boundary conditions . . . . . . . . . 2.5 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with the method of Finite elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.5.1 The ﬁnite element method applied to geometrical one-dimensional, steady-state temperature ﬁelds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.5.2 The ﬁnite element method applied to steady-state plane temperature ﬁelds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.5.3 The ﬁnite element method applied to transient, geometrical onedimensional heat conduction problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.5.4 Extension to transient, geometrical two-dimensional heat conduction problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.6 Mass 2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.6.4 2.6.5 2.6.6 2.6.7

diﬀusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Remarks on quiescent systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Derivation of the diﬀerential equation for the concentration ﬁeld Simpliﬁcations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Boundary conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Steady-state mass diﬀusion with catalytic surface reaction . . . . Steady-state mass diﬀusion with homogeneous chemical reaction Transient mass diﬀusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.6.7.1 Transient mass diﬀusion in a semi-inﬁnite solid . . . . . 2.6.7.2 Transient mass diﬀusion in bodies of simple geometry with one-dimensional mass ﬂow . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

194 195 195 197 198 199 205 208 209 210 212 213 216 216 219 224 225 230 236 241 242 242 245 250 251 254 258 262 263

. 264

2.7 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266

Contents

xiii

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

275

3.1 Preliminary remarks: Longitudinal, frictionless ﬂow over a ﬂat plate . . . 275 3.2 The balance equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.1 Reynolds’ transport theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.2 The mass balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.2.1 Pure substances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.2.2 Multicomponent mixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.3 The momentum balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.3.1 The stress tensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.3.2 Cauchy’s equation of motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.3.3 The strain tensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.3.4 Constitutive equations for the solution of the momentum equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.3.5 The Navier-Stokes equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.4 The energy balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.4.1 Dissipated energy and entropy . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.4.2 Constitutive equations for the solution of the energy equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.4.3 Some other formulations of the energy equation . . . 3.2.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

280 280 282 282 284 286 288 292 293

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

295 296 297 302

. . . 303 . . . 305 . . . 308

3.3 Inﬂuence of the Reynolds number on the ﬂow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310 3.4 Simpliﬁcations to the Navier-Stokes equations 3.4.1 Creeping ﬂows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.4.2 Frictionless ﬂows . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.4.3 Boundary layer ﬂows . . . . . . . . . . 3.5 The boundary layer equations . . . . . . . 3.5.1 The velocity boundary layer . . . . 3.5.2 The thermal boundary layer . . . . 3.5.3 The concentration boundary layer . 3.5.4 General comments on the solution of

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . boundary

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . layer

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

313 313 314 314

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . equations

. . . . .

. . . . .

315 315 319 323 323

3.6 Inﬂuence of turbulence on heat and mass transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327 3.6.1 Turbulent ﬂows near solid walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331 3.7 External forced ﬂow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.7.1 Parallel ﬂow along a ﬂat plate . . . . 3.7.1.1 Laminar boundary layer . . . 3.7.1.2 Turbulent ﬂow . . . . . . . . 3.7.2 The cylinder in crossﬂow . . . . . . . 3.7.3 Tube bundles in crossﬂow . . . . . . . 3.7.4 Some empirical equations for heat and external forced ﬂow . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . mass transfer . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . in . .

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

335 336 336 348 353 357

. . . . . . 361

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364 3.8.1 Laminar ﬂow in circular tubes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364 3.8.1.1 Hydrodynamic, fully developed, laminar ﬂow . . . . . . . 365

xiv

Contents

3.8.2 3.8.3 3.8.4

3.8.5 3.8.6

3.8.1.2 Thermal, fully developed, laminar ﬂow . . . . . . . . . 3.8.1.3 Heat transfer coeﬃcients in thermally fully developed, laminar ﬂow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.8.1.4 The thermal entry ﬂow with fully developed velocity proﬁle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.8.1.5 Thermally and hydrodynamically developing ﬂow . . . Turbulent ﬂow in circular tubes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Packed beds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Porous bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.8.4.1 Fluid ﬂow and momentum balance . . . . . . . . . . . 3.8.4.2 The energy balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.8.4.3 Heat transfer inside channels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fluidised beds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Some empirical equations for heat and mass transfer in ﬂow through channels, packed and ﬂuidised beds . . . . . . . . . . .

3.9 Free ﬂow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.9.1 The momentum equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.9.2 Heat transfer in laminar ﬂow on a vertical wall . . . . 3.9.3 Some empirical equations for heat transfer in free ﬂow 3.9.4 Mass transfer in free ﬂow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . 367 . . 369 . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

372 377 379 380 384 384 387 392 398

. . 407 . . . . .

. . . . .

411 413 417 421 423

3.10 Overlapping of free and forced ﬂow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 425 3.11 Compressible ﬂows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 426 3.11.1 The temperature ﬁeld in a compressible ﬂow . . . . . . . . . . . . 426 3.11.2 Calculation of heat transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 433 3.12 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 437 4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change 4.1 Heat transfer in condensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1.1 The diﬀerent types of condensation . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1.2 Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1.3 Deviations from Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory . . . 4.1.4 Inﬂuence of non-condensable gases . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1.5 Film condensation in a turbulent ﬁlm . . . . . . . . . . 4.1.6 Condensation of ﬂowing vapours . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1.7 Dropwise condensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1.8 Condensation of vapour mixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1.8.1 The temperature at the phase interface . . . . . 4.1.8.2 The material and energy balance for the vapour 4.1.8.3 Calculating the size of a condenser . . . . . . . 4.1.9 Some empirical equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2 Heat transfer in boiling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.1 The diﬀerent types of heat transfer . . . . . . . . 4.2.2 The formation of vapour bubbles . . . . . . . . . 4.2.3 Mechanism of heat transfer in natural convection

443

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

443 444 446 450 454 460 464 469 473 477 481 483 484

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . boiling

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

486 486 491 494

Contents

xv

4.2.4 4.2.5 4.2.6 4.2.7 4.2.8

Bubble frequency and departure diameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . Boiling in free ﬂow. The Nukijama curve . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stability during boiling in free ﬂow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Calculation of heat transfer coeﬃcients for boiling in free ﬂow . Some empirical equations for heat transfer during nucleate boiling in free ﬂow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.9 Two-phase ﬂow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.9.1 The diﬀerent ﬂow patterns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.9.2 Flow maps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.9.3 Some basic terms and deﬁnitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.9.4 Pressure drop in two-phase ﬂow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.9.5 The diﬀerent heat transfer regions in two-phase ﬂow . . 4.2.9.6 Heat transfer in nucleate boiling and convective evaporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.9.7 Critical boiling states . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.9.8 Some empirical equations for heat transfer in two-phase ﬂow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.10 Heat transfer in boiling mixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . .

498 500 502 505

. . . . . . .

509 513 514 516 517 520 528

. 530 . 533 . 535 . 536

4.3 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 542 5 Thermal radiation 5.1 Fundamentals. Physical quantities . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.1 Thermal radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.2 Emission of radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.2.1 Emissive power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.2.2 Spectral intensity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.2.3 Hemispherical spectral emissive power and 5.1.2.4 Diﬀuse radiators. Lambert’s cosine law . . 5.1.3 Irradiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.4 Absorption of radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.5 Reﬂection of radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.6 Radiation in an enclosure. Kirchhoﬀ’s law . . . .

545 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . total intensity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

545 546 548 548 549 551 555 557 559 564 566

5.2 Radiation from a black body . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.2.1 Deﬁnition and realisation of a black body . . . . . . . 5.2.2 The spectral intensity and the spectral emissive power 5.2.3 The emissive power and the emission of radiation in a interval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . wavelength . . . . . . .

569 569 571

5.3 Radiation properties of real bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.3.1 Emissivities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.3.2 The relationships between emissivity, absorptivity and The grey Lambert radiator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.3.2.1 Conclusions from Kirchhoﬀ’s law . . . . . . . 5.3.2.2 Calculation of absorptivities from emissivities 5.3.2.3 The grey Lambert radiator . . . . . . . . . . 5.3.3 Emissivities of real bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . reﬂectivity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

580 580

574

582 582 583 585 587

xvi

Contents

5.3.4

5.3.3.1 Electrical insulators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 588 5.3.3.2 Electrical conductors (metals) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 590 Transparent bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 593

5.4 Solar radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.4.1 Extraterrestrial solar radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.4.2 The attenuation of solar radiation in the earth’s atmosphere 5.4.2.1 Spectral transmissivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.4.2.2 Molecular and aerosol scattering . . . . . . . . . . . 5.4.2.3 Absorption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.4.3 Direct solar radiation on the ground . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.4.4 Diﬀuse solar radiation and global radiation . . . . . . . . . . 5.4.5 Absorptivities for solar radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

597 598 600 601 604 605 606 608 611

5.5 Radiative exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.5.1 View factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.5.2 Radiative exchange between black bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.5.3 Radiative exchange between grey Lambert radiators . . . . . . . . 5.5.3.1 The balance equations according to the net-radiation method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.5.3.2 Radiative exchange between a radiation source, a radiation receiver and a reradiating wall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.5.3.3 Radiative exchange in a hollow enclosure with two zones . 5.5.3.4 The equation system for the radiative exchange between any number of zones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.5.4 Protective radiation shields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

612 613 619 622

5.6 Gas radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.6.1 Absorption coeﬃcient and optical thickness . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.6.2 Absorptivity and emissivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.6.3 Results for the emissivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.6.4 Emissivities and mean beam lengths of gas spaces . . . . . . . . . 5.6.5 Radiative exchange in a gas ﬁlled enclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.6.5.1 Black, isothermal boundary walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.6.5.2 Grey isothermal boundary walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.6.5.3 Calculation of the radiative exchange in complicated cases

623 624 628 630 633 637 638 640 643 646 650 650 651 654

5.7 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 655 Appendix A: Supplements

660

A.1 Introduction to tensor notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 660 A.2 Relationship between mean and thermodynamic pressure . . . . . . . . . 662 A.3 Navier-Stokes equations for an incompressible ﬂuid of constant viscosity in cartesian coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 663 A.4 Navier-Stokes equations for an incompressible ﬂuid of constant viscosity in cylindrical coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 664 A.5 Entropy balance for mixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 665

Contents

xvii

A.6 Relationship between partial and speciﬁc enthalpy . . . . . . . . . . . . . 666 A.7 Calculation of the constants an of the Graetz-Nusselt problem (3.245) . . 667 Appendix B: Property data

669

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

683

Literature

701

Index

720

Nomenclature

Symbol

Meaning

A Am Aq Af a a aλ aλ at a∗ b b C C c c c c0 cf cp cR D Dt d dA dh E E0 Eλ e F

area average area cross sectional area ﬁn surface area thermal diﬀusivity hemispherical total absorptivity spectral absorptivity directional spectral absorptivity turbulent thermal diﬀusivity speciﬁc surface area √ thermal penetration coeﬃcient, b = λc Laplace constant, b = 2σ/g (L − G ) circumference, perimeter heat capacity ﬂow ratio speciﬁc heat capacity concentration propagation velocity of electromagnetic waves velocity of light in a vacuum friction factor speciﬁc heat capacity at constant pressure resistance factor binary diﬀusion coeﬃcient turbulent diﬀusion coeﬃcient diameter departure diameter of vapour bubbles hydraulic diameter irradiance solar constant spectral irradiance unit vector force

SI units m2 m2 m2 m2 m2 /s — — — m2 /s m2 /m3 W s1/2 /(m2 K) m m — J/(kg K) mol/m3 m/s m/s — J/(kg K) — m2 /s m2 /s m m m W/m2 W/m2 W/(m2 μm) — N

Nomenclature

FB Ff FR Fij F (0, λT ) f fj g H H H H˙ h h htot hi Δhv ˜v Δh I I j j∗ uj K Kλ k k k kG kH kj k1 k1 , k1 kn L L Lλ L0 LS

buoyancy force friction force resistance force view factor between surfaces i and j fraction function of black radiation frequency of vapour bubbles force per unit volume acceleration due to gravity height radiosity enthalpy enthalpy ﬂow Planck constant speciﬁc enthalpy speciﬁc total enthalpy, htot = h + w 2 /2 partial speciﬁc enthalpy speciﬁc enthalpy of vaporization molar enthalpy of vaporization momentum directional emissive power diﬀusional ﬂux diﬀusional ﬂux in a centre of gravity system diﬀusional ﬂux in a particle based system incident intensity incident spectral intensity overall heat transfer coeﬃcient extinction coeﬃcient Boltzmann constant spectral absorption coeﬃcient Henry coeﬃcient force per unit mass rate constant for a homogeneous ﬁrst order reaction rate constant for a homogeneous (heterogeneous) ﬁrst order reaction rate constant for a heterogeneous n-th order reaction length total intensity spectral intensity reference length solubility

xix

N N N — — 1/s N/m3 m/s2 m W/m2 J J/s Js J/kg J/kg J/kg J/kg J/mol kg m/s W/(m2 sr) mol/(m2 s) kg/(m2 s) mol/(m2 s) W/(m2 sr) W/(m2 μm) W/(m2 K) — J/K 1/m N/m2 N/kg 1/s m/s mol/(m2 s) (mol/m3 )n m W/(m2 sr) W/(m2 μm sr) m mol/(m3 Pa)

xx

l M M M Mλ M˙ ˜ M m mr m ˙ N Ni N˙ n n n˙ P Pdiss p p+ Q Q˙ q˙ R Rcond Rm r r rλ rλ re r+ r˙ S S s s s s sl

Nomenclature

length, mixing length mass modulus, M = aΔt/Δx2 (hemispherical total) emissive power spectral emissive power mass ﬂow rate molecular mass, molar mass optical mass relative optical mass mass ﬂux amount of substance dimensionless transfer capability (number of transfer units) of the material stream i molar ﬂow rate refractive index normal vector molar ﬂux power dissipated power pressure dimensionless pressure heat heat ﬂow heat ﬂux radius resistance to thermal conduction molar (universal) gas constant radial coordinate hemispherical total reﬂectivity spectral reﬂectivity directional spectral reﬂectivity electrical resistivity dimensionless radial coordinate reaction rate suppression factor in convective boiling entropy speciﬁc entropy Laplace transformation parameter beam length slip factor, s = wG /wL longitudinal pitch

m kg — W/m2 W/(m2 μm) kg/s kg/mol kg/m2 — kg/(m2 s) mol — mol/s — — mol/(m2 s) W W Pa — J W W/m2 m K/W J/(mol K) m — — — Ωm — mol/(m3 s) — J/K J/(kg K) 1/s m — m

Nomenclature

sq T Te TSt t t+ tk tj tR tD U u u u V VA v W ˙ W ˙i W w w0 wS wτ w w+ X ˜ X x x ˜ x+ x∗ x∗th Y˜ y y˜ y+ z z z+ zR

transverse pitch thermodynamic temperature eigentemperature stagnation point temperature time dimensionless time cooling time stress vector relaxation time, tR = 1/k1 relaxation time of diﬀusion, tD = L2 /D internal energy average molar velocity speciﬁc internal energy Laplace transformed temperature volume departure volume of a vapour bubble speciﬁc volume work power density heat capacity ﬂow rate of a ﬂuid i velocity reference velocity velocity of sound shear stress velocity, wτ = τ0 / ﬂuctuation velocity dimensionless velocity moisture content; Lockhart-Martinelli parameter molar content in the liquid phase coordinate mole fraction in the liquid dimensionless x-coordinate quality, x∗ = M˙ G /M˙ L thermodynamic quality molar content in the gas phase coordinate mole fraction in the gas phase dimensionless y-coordinate number axial coordinate dimensionless z-coordinate number of tube rows

xxi

m K K K s — s N/m2 s s J m/s J/kg K m3 m3 m3 /kg J W/m3 W/K m/s m/s m/s m/s m/s — — — m — — — — — m — — — m — —

xxii

Nomenclature

Greek letters Symbol

Meaning

α αm β βm β β β0 Γ˙

heat transfer coeﬃcient mean heat transfer coeﬃcient mass transfer coeﬃcient mean mass transfer coeﬃcient thermal expansion coeﬃcient polar angle, zenith angle base angle mass production rate molar production rate diﬀerence thickness; boundary layer thickness Kronecker symbol volumetric vapour content volumetric quality hemispherical total emissivity hemispherical spectral emissivity directional spectral emissivity turbulent diﬀusion coeﬃcient dimensionless temperature change of the material stream i dilatation strain tensor void fraction turbulent viscosity resistance factor bulk viscosity dynamic viscosity ﬁn eﬃciency overtemperature temperature dimensionless temperature isentropic exponent optical thickness of a gas beam wave length of an oscillation wave length thermal conductivity turbulent thermal conductivity diﬀusion resistance factor kinematic viscosity

γ˙ Δ δ δij ε ε∗ ε ελ ελ εD εi ε˙ii ε˙ji εp εt ζ ζ η ηf Θ ϑ ϑ+ κ κG Λ λ λ λt μ ν

SI units W/(m2 K) W/(m2 K) m/s m/s 1/K rad rad kg/(m3 s) mol/(m3 s) — m — — — — — — m2 /s — 1/s 1/s — m2 /s — kg/(m s) kg/(m s) — K K — — — m m W/(K m) W/(K m) — m2 /s

Nomenclature

ν σ σ ξ τ τλ τ τji Φ Φ ϕ Ψ ω ω ω˙

frequency density Stefan-Boltzmann constant interfacial tension mass fraction transmissivity spectral transmissivity shear stress shear stress tensor radiative power, radiation ﬂow viscous dissipation angle, circumferential angle stream function solid angle reference velocity power density

Subscripts Symbol

Meaning

A a abs B C diss E e eﬀ eq F f G g I i id in K L lam m max

air, substance A ambient absorbed substance B condensate, cooling medium dissipated excess, product, solidiﬁcation exit, external, eigentemperature eﬀective equilibrium ﬂuid, feed ﬁn, friction gas geodetic, base material at the phase interface inner, inlet ideal incident radiation, irradiation substance K liquid laminar mean, molar (based on the amount of substance) maximum

xxiii

1/s kg/m3 W/(m2 K4 ) N/m — — — N/m2 N/m2 W W/m3 rad m2 /s sr m/s W/m2

xxiv

min n o P ref S s tot trans turb u V W α δ λ ω 0 ∞

Nomenclature

minimum normal direction outlet, outside particle reﬂected, reference state solid, bottom product, sun, surroundings black body, saturation total transmitted turbulent in particle reference system boiler wall, water start at the point y = δ spectral end reference state; at the point y = 0 at a great distance; in inﬁnity

Dimensionless numbers Ar = [(S − F )/F ] d3P g/ν 2 Bi = αL/λ BiD = βL/D Bo = q/ ˙ (mΔh ˙ v) Da = k1 L/D Ec = w 2 / (cp Δϑ) Fo = at/L2 Fr = w2 / (gx) Ga = gL3 /ν 2 Gr = gβΔϑL3 /ν 2 2 Ha = k1 L2 /D Le = a/D Ma = w/wS N u = αL/λ P e = wL/a P h = hE / [c (ϑE − ϑ0 )] P r = ν/a Ra = GrP r Re = wL/ν Sc = ν/D Sh = βL/D St = α/ (wcp ) St = 1/P h

Archimedes number Biot number Biot number for mass transfer boiling number Damk¨ ohler number (for 1st order heterogeneous reaction) Eckert number Fourier number Froude number Galilei number Grashof number Hatta number Lewis number Mach number Nusselt number P´eclet number phase change number Prandtl number Rayleigh number Reynolds number Schmidt number Sherwood number Stanton number Stefan number

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

In this chapter the basic deﬁnitions and physical quantities needed to describe heat and mass transfer will be introduced, along with the fundamental laws of these processes. They can already be used to solve technical problems, such as the transfer of heat between two ﬂuids separated by a wall, or the sizing of apparatus used in heat and mass transfer. The calculation methods presented in this introductory chapter will be relatively simple, whilst a more detailed presentation of complex problems will appear in the following chapters.

1.1

The diﬀerent types of heat transfer

In thermodynamics, heat is deﬁned as the energy that crosses the boundary of a system when this energy transport occurs due to a temperature diﬀerence between the system and its surroundings, cf. [1.1], [1.2]. The second law of thermodynamics states that heat always ﬂows over the boundary of the system in the direction of falling temperature. However, thermodynamics does not state how the heat transferred depends on this temperature driving force, or how fast or intensive this irreversible process is. It is the task of the science of heat transfer to clarify the laws of this process. Three modes of heat transfer can be distinguished: conduction, convection, and radiation. The following sections deal with their basic laws, more in depth information is given in chapter 2 for conduction, 3 and 4 for convection and 5 for radiation. We limit ourselves to a phenomenological description of heat transfer processes, using the thermodynamic concepts of temperature, heat, heat ﬂow and heat ﬂux. In contrast to thermodynamics, which mainly deals with homogeneous systems, the so-called phases, heat transfer is a continuum theory which deals with ﬁelds extended in space and also dependent on time. This has consequences for the concept of heat, which in thermodynamics is deﬁned as energy which crosses the system boundary. In heat transfer one speaks of a heat ﬂow also within the body. This contradiction with thermodynamic terminology can be resolved by considering that in a continuum theory the mass and volume elements of the body are taken to be small systems, between which energy can be transferred as heat. Therefore, when one speaks of heat ﬂow within

2

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

a solid body or ﬂuid, or of the heat ﬂux vector ﬁeld in conjunction with the temperature ﬁeld, the thermodynamic theory is not violated. As in thermodynamics, the thermodynamic temperature T is used in heat transfer. However with the exception of radiative heat transfer the zero point of the thermodynamic temperature scale is not needed, usually only temperature diﬀerences are important. For this reason a thermodynamic temperature with an adjusted zero point, an example being the Celsius temperature, is used. These thermodynamic temperature diﬀerences are indicated by the symbol ϑ, deﬁned as ϑ := T − T0

(1.1)

where T0 can be chosen arbitrarily and is usually set at a temperature that best ﬁts the problem that requires solving. When T0 = 273.15 K then ϑ will be the Celsius temperature. The value for T0 does not normally need to be speciﬁed as temperature diﬀerences are independent of T0 .

1.1.1

Heat conduction

Heat conduction is the transfer of energy between neighbouring molecules in a substance due to a temperature gradient. In metals also the free electrons transfer energy. In solids which do not transmit radiation, heat conduction is the only process for energy transfer. In gases and liquids heat conduction is superimposed by an energy transport due to convection and radiation. The mechanism of heat conduction in solids and ﬂuids is diﬃcult to understand theoretically. We do not need to look closely at this theory; it is principally used in the calculation of thermal conductivity, a material property. We will limit ourselves to the phenomenological discussion of heat conduction, using the thermodynamic quantities of temperature, heat ﬂow and heat ﬂux, which are suﬃcient to deal with most technically interesting conduction problems. The transport of energy in a conductive material is described by the vector ﬁeld of heat ﬂux ˙ q˙ = q(x, t) . (1.2) In terms of a continuum theory the heat ﬂux vector represents the direction and magnitude of the energy ﬂow at a position indicated by the vector x. It can also be dependent on time t. The heat ﬂux q˙ is deﬁned in such a way that the heat ﬂow dQ˙ through a surface element dA is ˙ ˙ cos β dA . dQ˙ = q(x, t) n dA = |q|

(1.3)

Here n is the unit vector normal (outwards) to the surface, which with q˙ forms the angle β, Fig. 1.1. The heat ﬂow dQ˙ is greatest when q˙ is perpendicular to dA making β = 0. The dimension of heat ﬂow is energy/time (thermal power), with

1.1 The diﬀerent types of heat transfer

3

Fig. 1.1: Surface element with normal vector n and heat ﬂux vector q˙

SI unit J/s = W. Heat ﬂux is the heat ﬂow per surface area with units J/s m2 = W/m2 . The transport of energy by heat conduction is due to a temperature gradient in the substance. The temperature ϑ changes with both position and time. All temperatures form a temperature ﬁeld ϑ = ϑ(x, t) . Steady temperature ﬁelds are not dependent on the time t. One speaks of unsteady or transient temperature ﬁelds when the changes with time are important. All points of a body that are at the same temperature ϑ, at the same moment in time, can be thought of as joined by a surface. This isothermal surface or isotherm separates the parts of the body which have a higher temperature than ϑ, from those with a lower temperature than ϑ. The greatest temperature change occurs normal to the isotherm, and is given by the temperature gradient grad ϑ =

∂ϑ ∂ϑ ∂ϑ ex + ey + ez ∂x ∂y ∂z

(1.4)

where ex , ey and ez represent the unit vectors in the three coordinate directions. The gradient vector is perpendicular to the isotherm which goes through the point being considered and points to the direction of the greatest temperature increase.

Fig. 1.2: Point P on the isotherm ϑ = const with the temperature gradient grad ϑ from (1.4) and the heat ﬂux vector q˙ from (1.5)

Considering the temperature gradients as the cause of heat ﬂow in a conductive material, it suggests that a simple proportionality between cause and eﬀect may be assumed, allowing the heat ﬂux to be written as q˙ = −λ grad ϑ .

(1.5)

4

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

This is J. B. Fourier’s1 basic law for the conduction of heat, from 1822. The minus sign in this equation is accounting for the 2nd law of thermodynamics: heat ﬂows in the direction of falling temperature, Fig. 1.2. The constant of proportion in (1.5) is a property of the material, the thermal conductivity λ = λ(ϑ, p) . It is dependent on both the temperature ϑ and pressure p, and in mixtures on the composition. The thermal conductivity λ is a scalar as long as the material is isotropic, which means that the ability of the material to conduct heat depends on position within the material, but for a given position not on the direction. All materials will be assumed to be isotropic, apart from a few special examples in Chapter 3, even though several materials do have thermal conductivities that depend on direction. This can be seen in wood, which conducts heat across its ﬁbres signiﬁcantly better than along them. In such non-isotropic medium λ is a tensor of second order, and the vectors q˙ and grad ϑ form an angle in contrast to Fig. 1.2. In isotropic substances the heat ﬂux vector is always perpendicular to the isothermal surface. From (1.3) and (1.5) the heat ﬂow dQ˙ through a surface element dA oriented in any direction is ∂ϑ dQ˙ = −λ ( grad ϑ) n dA = −λ dA . ∂n

(1.6)

Here ∂ϑ/∂n is the derivative of ϑ with respect to the normal (outwards) direction to the surface element. Table 1.1: Thermal conductivity of selected substances at 20 ◦ C and 100 kPa Substance Silver Copper Aluminium 99.2 % Iron Steel Alloys Brickwork Foam Sheets

λ in W/K m 427 399 209 81 13 . . . 48 0.5 . . . 1.3 0.02 . . . 0.09

Substance Water Hydrocarbons CO2 Air Hydrogen Krypton R 123

λ in W/K m 0.598 0.10 . . . 0.15 0.0162 0.0257 0.179 0.0093 0.0090

The thermal conductivity, with SI units of W/K m, is one of the most important properties in heat transfer. Its pressure dependence must only be considered for gases and liquids. Its temperature dependence is often not very signiﬁcant and can then be neglected. More extensive tables of λ are available in Appendix B, 1

Jean Baptiste Fourier (1768–1830) was Professor for Analysis at the Ecole Polytechnique in Paris and from 1807 a member of the French Academy of Science. His most important work “Th´eorie analytique de la chaleur” appeared in 1822. It is the ﬁrst comprehensive mathematical theory of conduction and cointains the “Fourier Series” for solving boundary value problems in transient heat conduction.

1.1 The diﬀerent types of heat transfer

5

Tables B1 to B8, B10 and B11. As shown in the short Table 1.1, metals have very high thermal conductivities, solids which do not conduct electricity have much lower values. One can also see that liquids and gases have especially small values for λ. The low value for foamed insulating material is because of its structure. It contains numerous small, gas-ﬁlled spaces surrounded by a solid that also has low thermal conductivity.

1.1.2

Steady, one-dimensional conduction of heat

As a simple, but practically important application, the conduction of heat independent of time, so called steady conduction, in a ﬂat plate, in a hollow cylinder and in a hollow sphere will be considered in this section. The assumption is made that heat ﬂows in only one direction, perpendicular to the plate surface, and radially in the cylinder and sphere, Fig. 1.3. The temperature ﬁeld is then only dependent on one geometrical coordinate. This is known as one-dimensional heat conduction.

Fig. 1.3: Steady, one dimensional conduction. a Temperature proﬁle in a ﬂat plate of thickness δ = r2 − r1 , b Temperature proﬁle in a hollow cylinder (tube wall) or hollow sphere of inner radius r1 and outer radius r2

The position coordinate in all three cases is designated by r. The surfaces r = const are isothermal surfaces; and therefore ϑ = ϑ(r). We assume that ϑ has the constant values ϑ = ϑW1 , when r = r1 , and ϑ = ϑW2 , when r = r2 . These two surface temperatures shall be given. A relationship between the heat ﬂow Q˙ through the ﬂat or curved walls, and the temperature diﬀerence ϑW1 − ϑW2 , must be found. For illustration we assume ϑW1 > ϑW2 , without loss of generality. Therefore heat ﬂows in the direction of increasing r. The heat ﬂow Q˙ has a certain value, which on the inner and outer surfaces, and on each isotherm r = const is the same, as in steady conditions no energy can be stored in the wall. Fourier’s law gives the following for the heat ﬂow dϑ Q˙ = q(r)A(r) ˙ = −λ(ϑ) A(r) . (1.7) dr In the ﬂat wall A is not dependent on r: A = A1 = A2 . If the thermal conductivity is constant, then the temperature gradient dϑ/dr will also be constant. The steady

6

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

temperature proﬁle in a plane wall with constant λ is linear. This is not true in the case of both the cylinder and the sphere, and also if λ changes with temperature. In these more general cases (1.7) becomes −λ(ϑ) dϑ = Q˙

dr A(r)

and after integrating over the wall thickness δ = r2 − r1 ϑW2 r2 dr ˙ − λ(ϑ) dϑ = Q . A(r) ϑW1

r1

From the mean value theorem for integration comes −λm (ϑW2 − ϑW1 ) = Q˙

δ Am

or

λm (1.8) Q˙ = Am (ϑW1 − ϑW2 ) . δ The heat ﬂow is directly proportional to the diﬀerence in temperature between the two surfaces. The driving force of temperature diﬀerence is analogous to the potential diﬀerence (voltage) in an electric circuit and so λm Am /δ is the thermal conductance and its inverse δ Rcond := (1.9) λm Am the thermal resistance. In analogy to electric circuits we get Q˙ = (ϑW1 − ϑW2 ) /Rcond .

(1.10)

The average thermal conductivity can easily be calculated using 1 λm := (ϑW2 − ϑW1 )

ϑW2 λ(ϑ) dϑ .

(1.11)

ϑW1

In many cases the temperature dependence of λ can be neglected, giving λm = λ. If λ changes linearly with ϑ then 1 λm = λ (ϑW1 ) + λ (ϑW2 ) . (1.12) 2 This assumption is generally suﬃcient for the region ϑW1 ≤ ϑ ≤ ϑW2 as λ can rarely be measured with a relative error smaller than 1 to 2%. The average area Am in (1.8) is deﬁned by 1 1 := Am r2 − r1

r2 r1

dr A(r)

(1.13)

1.1 The diﬀerent types of heat transfer

We have

⎧ A1 = A2 for a ﬂat plate ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ 2πLr for a cylinder of length L A(r) = ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ 4πr 2 for a sphere.

From (1.13) we get

Am =

7

(1.14)

⎧ ⎪ A1 = A2 = 21 (A1 + A2 ) ﬂat plate ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ (A2 − A1 ) / ln (A2 /A1 ) ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ √ A1 A2

cylinder

(1.15)

sphere .

The average area Am is given by the average of both surface areas A1 = A(r1 ) and A2 = A(r2 ). One gets the arithmetic mean for the ﬂat plate, the logarithmic mean for the cylinder and the geometric mean for the sphere. It is known that 1 A2 − A1 ≤ (A1 + A2 ) . A1 A2 ≤ ln (A2 /A1 ) 2 For the thermal resistance to conduction it ⎧ δ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ λ mA ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ln (d2/d1 ) Rcond = 2πLλm ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ (d2 /d1 ) − 1 2πd2 λm

follows ﬂat plate cylinder

(1.16)

sphere

The wall thickness for the cylinder (tube wall) and sphere is 1 (d2 − d1 ) 2 so that Rcond can be expressed in terms of both diameters d1 and d2 . The temperature proﬁle in each case shall also be determined. We limit ourselves to the case λ = const. With A(r) from (1.14) and integrating δ = r2 − r1 =

− dϑ =

Q˙ dr λ A(r)

the dimensionless temperature ratio is ⎧ r −r 2 ⎪ ﬂat plate ⎪ r2 − r1 ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ϑ(r) − ϑW2 ⎨ ln (r2 /r) cylinder = ln (r2 /r1 ) ϑW1 − ϑW2 ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ 1/r − 1/r2 sphere 1/r1 − 1/r2

(1.17)

8

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Fig. 1.4: Steady temperature proﬁle from (1.17) in a ﬂat, cylindrical and spherical wall of the same thickness δ and with r2 /r1 = 3

As already mentioned the temperature change is linear in the ﬂat plate. The cylinder has a logarithmic, and the sphere a hyperbolic temperature dependence on the radial coordinates. Fig. 1.4 shows the temperature proﬁle according to (1.17) in walls of equal thickness. The largest deviation from the straight line by the logarithmic and hyperbolic temperature proﬁles appears at the point r = rm , where the cross sectional area A(r) assumes the value A (rm ) = Am according to (1.15). Example 1.1: A ﬂat wall of thickness δ = 0.48 m, is made out of ﬁreproof stone whose thermal conductivity changes with temperature. With the Celsius temperature ϑ, between 0 ◦ C and 800 ◦ C it holds that λ0 (1.18) λ(ϑ) = 1 − bϑ where λ0 = 0.237 W/K m and b = 4.41 · 10−4 K−1 . The surface temperatures are ϑW1 = ˙ 750 ◦ C and ϑW2 = 150 ◦ C. The heat ﬂux q˙ = Q/A and the temperature proﬁle in the wall need to be calculated. From (1.8) the heat ﬂux is λm (ϑW1 − ϑW2 ) q˙ = (1.19) δ with the average thermal conductivity λm

1 = ϑW2 − ϑW1

ϑ W2

λ(ϑ) dϑ =

ϑW1

1 − bϑW2 λ0 ln . b (ϑW1 − ϑW2 ) 1 − bϑW1

Putting as an abbreviation λ(ϑWi ) = λi (i = 1, 2) we get λm =

ln(λ1 /λ2 ) ln(λ1 /λ2 ) = λ1 λ2 . 1 1 λ1 − λ2 − λ2 λ1

(1.20)

The average thermal conductivity λm can be calculated using the λ values for both surfaces. It is the square of the geometric mean divided by the logarithmic mean of the two values λ1 and λ2 . This yields from (1.18) λ1 = λ(ϑW1 ) = 0.354 W/K m ,

λ2 = λ(ϑW2 ) = 0.254 W/K m ,

1.1 The diﬀerent types of heat transfer

9

2

and from that λm = 0.298 W/K m. The heat ﬂux follows from (1.19) as q˙ = 373 W/m . Under the rather inaccurate assumption that λ varies linearly with the temperature, it would follow that 1 λm = (λ1 + λ2 ) = 0.304 W/K m 2 Although this value is 1.9% too large it is still a useful approximation, as its deviation from the exact value is within the bounds of uncertainty associated with the measurement of thermal conductivity. To calculate the temperature proﬁle in the wall we will use (1.7) as the starting point, −λ(ϑ) dϑ = q˙ dr , and with x = r − r1 this gives ϑ −λ0 ϑW1

dϑ λ0 1 − bϑ = qx ˙ . = ln 1 − bϑ b 1 − bϑW1

With q˙ from (1.19) and λm from (1.20) it follows that ln or

Finally using (1.18) we get

x 1 − bϑW2 1 − bϑ = ln 1 − bϑW1 δ 1 − bϑW1

1 − bϑ = 1 − bϑW1

1 − bϑW2 1 − bϑW1

x/δ .

x/δ 1 λ0 λ1 ϑ(x) = 1− b λ1 λ2

(1.21)

for the equation to calculate the temperature proﬁle in the wall.

Fig. 1.5: Steady temperature proﬁle ϑ = ϑ (x/δ) from (1.21) in a ﬂat wall with temperature dependent thermal conductivity according to (1.18). Δϑ is the deviation of the temperature proﬁle from the straight line which is valid for a constant value of λ, right hand scale.

Fig. 1.5 shows ϑ(x) and the deviation Δϑ(x) from the linear temperature proﬁle between ϑW1 and ϑW2 . At high temperatures, where the thermal conductivity is large, the temperature gradient is smaller than at lower temperatures, where λ(ϑ) is smaller. At each point

10

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

in the wall the product

dϑ dx has to be the same. Smaller values of the thermal conductivity are “compensated” by larger temperature gradients. q˙ = −λ(ϑ)

1.1.3

Convective heat transfer. Heat transfer coeﬃcient

In a ﬂowing ﬂuid, energy is transferred not only through heat conduction but also by the macroscopic movement of the ﬂuid. When we imagine an area located at a given position within the ﬂuid, heat ﬂows through this area by conduction due to the temperature gradient and in addition energy as enthalpy and kinetic energy of the ﬂuid which crosses the area. This is known as convective heat transfer which can be described as the superposition of thermal conduction and energy transfer by the ﬂowing ﬂuid. Heat transfer between a solid wall and a ﬂuid, e.g. in a heated tube with a cold gas ﬂowing inside it, is of special technical interest. The ﬂuid layer close to the wall has the greatest eﬀect on the amount of heat transferred. It is known as the boundary layer and boundary layer theory founded by L. Prandtl2 in 1904 is the area of ﬂuid dynamics that is most important for heat and mass transfer. In the boundary layer the velocity component parallel to the wall changes, over a small distance, from zero at the wall to almost the maximum value occurring in the core ﬂuid, Fig. 1.6. The temperature in the boundary layer also changes from that at the wall ϑW to ϑF at some distance from the wall. Heat will ﬂow from the wall into the ﬂuid as a result of the temperature diﬀerence ϑW − ϑF , but if the ﬂuid is hotter than the wall, ϑF > ϑW , the ﬂuid will be cooled as heat ﬂows into the wall. The heat ﬂux at the wall q˙W depends on the temperature and velocity ﬁelds in the ﬂuid; their evaluation is quite complex and can lead to considerable problems in calculation. One puts therefore q˙W = α (ϑW − ϑF )

(1.22)

with a new quantity, the local heat transfer coeﬃcient, deﬁned by α :=

q˙W . ϑW − ϑF

(1.23)

This deﬁnition replaces the unknown heat ﬂux q˙W , with the heat transfer coefﬁcient, which is also unknown. This is the reason why many researchers see the introduction of α as unnecessary and superﬂuous. Nevertheless the use of heat 2 Ludwig Prandtl (1875–1953) was Professor for Applied Mechanics at the University of G¨ ottingen from 1904 until his death. He was also Director of the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut for Fluid Mechanics from 1925. His boundary layer theory, and work on turbulent ﬂow, wing theory and supersonic ﬂow are fundamental contributions to modern ﬂuid mechanics.

1.1 The diﬀerent types of heat transfer

11

Fig. 1.6: Velocity w (left) and temperature ϑ (right) proﬁles in a ﬂuid as a function of distance from the wall y. δ and δt represent the velocity and temperature boundary layer thicknesses.

transfer coeﬃcients seems to be reasonable, because when α is known both the basic questions in convective heat transfer can be easily answered: What is the heat ﬂux q˙W for a given temperature diﬀerence ϑW − ϑF , and what diﬀerence in temperature ϑW − ϑF causes a given heat ﬂux q˙W between the wall and the ﬂuid? In order to see how the heat transfer coeﬃcient and the temperature ﬁeld in the ﬂuid are related, the immediate neighbourhood of the wall (y → 0) is considered. Here the ﬂuid adheres to the wall, except in the case of very dilute gases. Its velocity is zero, and energy can only be transported by heat conduction. So instead of (1.22) the physically based relationship (Fourier’s law) is valid:

∂ϑ q˙W = −λ , (1.24) ∂y W where λ, or to be more exact λ(ϑW ), is the thermal conductivity of the ﬂuid at the wall temperature. The heat ﬂux q˙W is found from the gradient of the temperature proﬁle of the ﬂuid at the wall, Fig. 1.7. From the deﬁnition (1.23), it follows for the heat transfer coeﬃcient

∂ϑ ∂y W α = −λ . (1.25) ϑW − ϑ F From this it is clear that α is determined by the gradient of the temperature proﬁle at the wall and the diﬀerence between the wall and ﬂuid temperatures. Therefore,

Fig. 1.7: Fluid temperature ϑ = ϑ (y) as a function of distance from the wall y and illustration of the ratio λ/α as a subtangent

12

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

to calculate the heat transfer coeﬃcient, knowledge of the temperature ﬁeld in the ﬂuid is required. This is, in turn, inﬂuenced by the velocity ﬁeld within the ﬂuid. So, in addition to the energy balances from thermodynamics, the equations of ﬂuid motion from ﬂuid mechanics furnish the fundamental relationships in the theory of convective heat transfer. A simple graphical illustration of α follows from (1.25). As shown in Fig. 1.7 the ratio λ/α is the distance from the wall at which the tangent to the temperature proﬁle crosses the ϑ = ϑF line. The length of λ/α is of the magnitude of the (thermal) boundary layer thickness which will be calculated in sections 3.5 and 3.7.1 and which is normally a bit larger than λ/α. A thin boundary layer indicates good heat transfer whilst a thick layer leads to small values of α. The temperature of the ﬂuid ϑF far away from the wall, appears in (1.23), the deﬁnition of the local heat transfer coeﬃcient. If a ﬂuid ﬂows around a body, so called external ﬂow, the temperature ϑF is taken to be that of the ﬂuid so far away from the surface of the body that it is hardly inﬂuenced by heat transfer. ϑF is called the free ﬂow temperature, and is often written as ϑ∞ . However, when a ﬂuid ﬂows in a channel, (internal ﬂow), e.g. in a heated tube, the ﬂuid temperature at each point in a cross-section of the channel will be inﬂuenced by the heat transfer from the wall. The temperature proﬁle for this case is shown in Figure 1.8. ϑF is deﬁned here as a cross sectional average temperature in such a way that ϑF is also a characteristic temperature for energy transport in the ﬂuid along the channel axis. This deﬁnition of ϑF links the heat ﬂow from the wall characterised by α and the energy transported by the ﬂowing ﬂuid.

Fig. 1.8: Temperature proﬁle in a channel cross section. Wall temperature ϑW and average ﬂuid temperature ϑF

To deﬁne ϑF we will take a small section of the channel, Fig. 1.9. The heat ﬂow from the wall area dA to the ﬂuid is dQ˙ = α (ϑW − ϑF ) dA . (1.26) From the ﬁrst law of thermodynamics, neglecting the change in kinetic energy, we have dQ˙ = H˙ + dH˙ − H˙ = dH˙ . (1.27) The ﬂow of heat causes a change in the enthalpy ﬂow H˙ of the ﬂuid. The cross sectional average ﬂuid temperature ϑF is now deﬁned such that the enthalpy ﬂow can be written as H˙ = w h(ϑ) dAq = M˙ h(ϑF) (1.28) (Aq )

1.1 The diﬀerent types of heat transfer

13

Fig. 1.9: Energy balance for a channel section (left); ﬂuid velocity w and temperature ϑ proﬁles in channel cross section (right) as the product of the mass ﬂow rate M˙ =

w dAq (Aq )

and the speciﬁc enthalpy h(ϑF ) at the average temperature ϑF . ϑF is also called the adiabatic mixing temperature. This is the average temperature of the ﬂuid when all elements in a cross section are mixed adiabatically in a container leaving it with the constant temperature ϑF . According to the ﬁrst law, the enthalpy ﬂow H˙ with which the unmixed ﬂuid enters the adiabatic container must be equal to the enthalpy ﬂow M˙ h(ϑF ) of the ﬂuid as it leaves the container. This is implied by (1.28) where ϑF has been implicitly deﬁned. To calculate the adiabatic mixing temperature ϑF the pressure dependence of the speciﬁc enthalpy is neglected. Then setting h(ϑ) = h0 + [cp ]ϑϑ0 (ϑ − ϑ0 ) and

h(ϑF ) = h0 + [cp ]ϑϑF0 (ϑF − ϑ0 )

with [cp ]ϑϑ0 as the average speciﬁc heat capacity of the ﬂuid between ϑ and the reference temperature ϑ0 at which h(ϑ0 ) = h0 , we get from (1.28) 1 w [cp ]ϑϑ0 (ϑ − ϑ0 ) dAq . (1.29) ϑF = ϑ0 + M˙ [cp ]ϑϑF0 (Aq )

For practical calculations a constant speciﬁc heat capacity cp is assumed, giving 1 w ϑ dAq ϑF = M˙

(1.30)

(Aq )

as well as dH˙ = M˙ cp dϑF .

(1.31)

The adiabatic mixing temperature from (1.30) is the link between the local heat transfer coefﬁcient α from (1.23) and the enthalpy ﬂow for every cross section, because from (1.26), (1.27) and (1.31) follows dQ˙ = α (ϑW − ϑF ) dA = M˙ cp dϑF . (1.32) The adiabatic mixing temperature ϑF is diﬀerent from the integrated average of the cross sectional temperature 1 ϑm = ϑ dAq . Aq (Aq )

14

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Fig. 1.10: Average ﬂuid temperature ϑF , wall temperature ϑW and local heat transfer coeﬃcient as functions of the axial distance z, when heating a ﬂuid in a tube of length L

Both temperatures are only equal if the velocity at each point in the cross section is the same, i.e. in plug ﬂow with w = const.

So far we have considered the local heat transfer coeﬃcient, which can be diﬀerent at every point of the wall. In practice generally only an average heat transfer coeﬃcient αm is required in order to evaluate the ﬂow of heat Q˙ from an area A into the ﬂuid: Q˙ = αmAΔϑ or

Q˙ . (1.33) AΔϑ In this deﬁnition for αm the temperature diﬀerence Δϑ can still be chosen at will; a reasonable choice will be discussed later on. If the local heat transfer coeﬃcient α is known, αm can be found by integration. This gives for the ﬂow of heat transferred ˙ Q = q(A) ˙ dA = α (ϑW − ϑF ) dA . (1.34) αm :=

(A)

(A)

The three quantities — α, ϑW and ϑF — all change over the area. Fig. 1.10 shows this behaviour for a ﬂuid being heated in a tube. It is assumed that all three quantities change with the axial coordinate z, but not radially. From equations (1.33) and (1.34), the average heat transfer coeﬃcient is then 1 αm = α (ϑW − ϑF ) dA . AΔϑ (A)

In external ﬂow the free ﬂow temperature ϑF = ϑ∞ is normally constant. Therefore Δϑ will be deﬁned using ϑ∞ and the characteristic wall temperature ϑW : Δϑ = ϑW − ϑ∞ . If the wall temperature of the body around which the ﬂuid is ﬂowing is constant, then Δϑ = ϑW − ϑ∞ gives the following for the average heat transfer coeﬃcient: 1 αm = α dA . A (A)

1.1 The diﬀerent types of heat transfer

15

In channel ﬂow, Q˙ can either be calculated by integration over the heat transfer area A, or more simply, by using (1.32): Q˙ = M˙ cp (ϑFa − ϑFe ) . From this and (1.33) M˙ cp (ϑFa − ϑFe ) , AΔϑ where ϑFa and ϑFe are the mean ﬂuid temperatures at the channel entrance and exit. Certain means of the temperature diﬀerence ϑW − ϑF at entrance and exit are used for Δϑ; the main one is the logarithmic mean αm =

Δϑlog :=

(ϑW − ϑF )e − (ϑW − ϑF )a (ϑ − ϑF )e ln W (ϑW − ϑF )a

(1.35)

With Δϑ = Δϑlog we get for the special case of constant wall temperature αm =

M˙ (ϑW − ϑF )e . cp ln A (ϑW − ϑF )a

(1.36)

To determine αm experimentally only M˙ , the wall temperature and average ﬂuid temperature at entry and exit need to be measured. The use of the logarithmic mean value is also suggested by the following: when both the wall temperature ϑW and the local heat transfer coeﬃcient α are constant, then αm = α is only true when Δϑlog is used in the deﬁnition for αm . Then from (1.32) it follows that α dA dϑF = . ϑW − ϑF M˙ cp Integration at constant α and wall temperature ϑW gives ln

(ϑW − ϑF )e αA = . (ϑW − ϑF )a M˙ cp

Putting this into (1.36), it follows that αm = α.

1.1.4

Determining heat transfer coeﬃcients. Dimensionless numbers

Knowledge of the temperature ﬁeld in the ﬂuid is a prerequisite for the calculation of the heat transfer coeﬃcient using (1.25). This, in turn, can only be determined when the velocity ﬁeld is known. Only in relatively simple cases, exact values for the heat transfer coeﬃcient can be found by solving the fundamental partial diﬀerential equations for the temperature and velocity. Examples of this include heat transfer in fully developed, laminar ﬂow in tubes and parallel ﬂow over a ﬂat plate with a laminar boundary layer. Simpliﬁed models are required for turbulent

16

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

ﬂow, and the more complex problems such as nucleate boiling cannot be handled theoretically at all. An important method for ﬁnding heat transfer coeﬃcients was and still is the experiment. By measuring the heat ﬂow or ﬂux, as well as the wall and ﬂuid temperatures the local or mean heat transfer coeﬃcient can be found using (1.25) and (1.33). To completely solve the heat transfer problem all the quantities which inﬂuence the heat transfer must be varied when these measurements are taken. These quantities include the geometric dimensions (e.g. tube length and diameter), the characteristic ﬂow velocity and the properties of the ﬂuid, namely density, viscosity, thermal conductivity and speciﬁc heat capacity. The number of these variables is generally between ﬁve and ten. To quantify the eﬀect of one particular property, experiments must be done with at least n (e.g. n = 5) diﬀerent values whilst keeping all other variables constant. With m diﬀerent variables to consider in all, the number of individual experiments required will be nm . With six variables and n = 5 then 56 = 15625 experimental runs will have to be done. Obviously this demands a great deal of time and expense. The use of similarity or model theory, cf. [1.19],[1.20], can reduce the number of experiments signiﬁcantly. Similarity theory utilises the principle that the temperature and velocity ﬁelds (like other physical correlations) can be described by dimensionless quantities, namely dimensionless variables and dimensionless groups of physical quantities. This fact is a consequence of the general principle that the solution of a physical problem has to be independent of any system of units and can therefore be represented by dimensionless variables. This is done by dividing the position coordinate by a characteristic length, the velocity component by a constant reference velocity and the temperature by a characteristic temperature diﬀerence. Temperature and velocity ﬁelds corresponding in their dimensionless coordinates are known as similar ﬁelds. They can be transformed into each other by a change in scale, namely a change in the reference quantities. Velocity and temperature ﬁelds are therefore only similar when also the dimensionless groups or numbers concur. These numbers contain geometric quantities, the decisive temperature diﬀerences and velocities and also the properties of the heat transfer ﬂuid. The number of dimensionless quantities is notably smaller than the total number of all the relevant physical quantities. The number of experiments is signiﬁcantly reduced because only the functional relationship between the dimensionless numbers needs to be investigated. Primarily, the values of the dimensionless numbers are varied rather than the individual quantities which make up the dimensionless numbers. The theoretical solution of a heat transfer problem is structured more clearly when dimensionless variables are used. It is therefore recommended that dimensionless variables should be introduced at the beginning of the problem solving process. The evaluation and representation of the solution will also be simpliﬁed by keeping the number of independent variables as small as possible through the use of dimensionless variables and groups.

1.1 The diﬀerent types of heat transfer

17

The partial diﬀerential equations for the velocity and temperature are the starting point for ﬁnding the characteristic quantities of heat transfer. The variables which appear, space coordinates, velocity components and temperature, are made dimensionless by dividing respectively by a characteristic length, velocity and temperature. The original partial diﬀerential equations are then transformed into partial diﬀerential equations with dimensionless variables and groups which consist of dimensionless power products of the characteristic quantities (length, velocity and temperature), and the ﬂuid properties such as density, viscosity and thermal conductivity. This procedure can be explained by using (1.25), which links the local heat transfer coeﬃcient α to the temperature ﬁeld, as an example. With L0 as the characteristic length e.g. the tube diameter, the dimensionless distance from the wall is y + := y/L0 . The temperature ϑ is made dimensionless by dividing by a characteristic temperature diﬀerence Δϑ0 . As only temperature diﬀerences or derivatives are present, by subtracting a reference temperature ϑ0 from ϑ one gets ϑ+ :=

ϑ − ϑ0 . Δϑ0

(1.37)

The choice of ϑ0 is adapted to the problem and ﬁxes the zero point of the dimensionless temperature ϑ+ . Then (1.25) gives α=− or

λ (∂ϑ+ /∂y + )W + L0 ϑ+ W − ϑF

(∂ϑ+/∂y + )W αL0 . =− + λ ϑ+ W − ϑF

(1.38)

The right hand side of (1.38) is a dimensionless expression, this also holds for the left hand side. The power product of the heat transfer coeﬃcient α, the characteristic length of the particular problem L0 and the thermal conductivity λ of the ﬂuid is known as the Nusselt number N u := αL0 /λ .

(1.39)

This number and those that follow were named after eminent researchers — in this case W. Nusselt3 — and are abbreviated to the ﬁrst two letters of their surnames when given as symbols in formulae. 3 Wilhelm Nusselt (1882–1957) was nominated Professor of Theoretical Mechanical Engineering at the Technische Hochschule, Karlsruhe in 1920. Between 1925 and 1952 he taught at the Technische Hochschule, Munich. In 1915 he published his fundamental work “The Fundamental Laws of Heat Transfer”, in which he introduced dimensionless groups for the ﬁrst time. Further important investigations included heat transfer in ﬁlm condensation, cross current heat transfer and the analogy between heat and mass transfer in evaporation.

18

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

The calculation of α leads back to the determination of the Nusselt number. According to (1.38) N u is dependent on the dimensionless temperature ﬁeld, and therefore it must be clariﬁed which dimensionless numbers determine the dimensionless temperature ϑ+ . To this end, instead of using the fundamental diﬀerential equations — this will be done in chapter 3 — we establish a list of the physical quantities and then use this to derive the dimensionless numbers. The dimensionless temperature ϑ+ from (1.37) depends on the dimensionless space coordinates x+ := x/L0 ,

y+ := y/L0 ,

z + := z/L0

and a series of other dimensionless numbers Ki : ϑ+ = ϑ+ x+ , y + , z +, K1 , K2, . . . .

(1.40)

Some of these dimensionless numbers are purely geometric parameters. In heat transfer between a ﬂowing ﬂuid and the inner wall of a tube with diameter d and length L one of these numbers is the ratio L/d (or its inverse d/L). Only tubes with the same value of L/d can be said to be geometrically similar. These geometry based dimensionless numbers will not be explicitly considered here, but those which independently of the geometry, determine the velocity and temperature ﬁelds, will be derived. The velocity ﬁeld is determined by the characteristic length L0 , and velocity w0 e.g. the entry velocity in a tube or the undisturbed velocity of a ﬂuid ﬂowing around a body, along with the density and viscosity η of the ﬂuid. While density already plays a role in frictionless ﬂow, the viscosity is the ﬂuid property which is characteristic in friction ﬂow and in the development of the boundary layer. The two material properties, thermal conductivity λ and speciﬁc heat capacity cp , of the ﬂuid are important for the determination of the temperature ﬁeld in conjunction with the characteristic temperature diﬀerence Δϑ0 . The speciﬁc heat capacity links the enthalpy of the ﬂuid to its temperature. With this we have seven quantities, namely L0 , w0 , , η, Δϑ0 , λ and cp , on which the temperature ﬁeld and therefore, according to (1.38), the heat transfer coeﬃcient and its dimensionless counterpart the Nusselt number depend. The dimensionless groups Ki will be made up of power products of these seven quantities. With suitable chosen exponents from a to g it follows that Ki = La0 · w0b · c · η d · Δϑe0 · λf · cgp ,

i = 1, 2, . . .

(1.41)

The dimension of any of these seven quantities can be written as a power product of the four fundamental dimensions length L, time Z, mass M and temperature T, which are suﬃcient for describing thermodynamics and heat transfer by physical

1.1 The diﬀerent types of heat transfer

19

quantities. For example, density is deﬁned as the quotient of mass and volume, with dimensions mass divided by length cubed: dim = M/L3 . Expressing the other six quantities in the same manner gives the following for the dimension of Ki from (1.41) dim Ki = La Lb · Z−b Mc L−3c Md L−d Z−d Te Mf Lf Z−3f T−f L2g Z−2g T−g . For Ki to be a dimensionless number dim Ki = 1 must hold. In order to fulﬁll this condition the exponents of the fundamental dimensions L, Z, M and T must be zero. This produces four homogeneous equations for the seven exponents as shown below dim L dim Z dim M dim T

=1: =1: =1: =1:

a + b − 3c − d − b − d c + d

+ f + 2g = 0 − 3f − 2g = 0 + f = 0 e − f − g = 0 .

(1.42)

Four homogeneous equations for the exponents of the seven quantities give 7− 4 = 3 independent dimensionless numbers, which are found by choosing arbitrary values for three exponents. This can be done in an inﬁnite number of ways leading to an inﬁnite amount of dimensionless numbers, but only three are independent of each other, the rest are all products of these three and will not give any new description of the temperature ﬁeld. The three most used characteristic numbers are found by taking the values for the exponents a, e and f from Table 1.2 and then calculating the values for b, c, d and g from (1.42). From (1.41) one gets the values for K1 , K2, and K3 given in Table 1.2. Table 1.2: Values for the exponents a, e and f in (1.41) and (1.42) and the resulting characteristic numbers Ki .

i 1 2 3

a e f 1 0 0 0 0 −1 0 −1 0

Ki w0 L0 η−1 ηcp λ−1 −1 w02 c−1 p Δϑ0

The number K1 is well known in ﬂuid dynamics and is called the Reynolds4 number w0 L0 w0 L0 Re := = . (1.43) η ν 4 Osborne Reynolds (1842–1912) was Professor of Engineering in Manchester, England, from 1868 until 1905. He was well known for his fundamental work in ﬂuid mechanics especially his investigation of the transition between laminar and turbulent ﬂow. He also developed the mathematical basis for the description of turbulent ﬂow.

20

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

In place of η the kinematic viscosity ν := η/ with SI units m2 /s, is introduced. The Reynolds number characterises the inﬂuence of the frictional and inertial forces on the ﬂow ﬁeld. The second number K2 contains only properties of the ﬂuid. It is called the Prandtl number η cp ν P r := = , (1.44) λ a where a := λ/cp is the thermal diﬀusivity of the ﬂuid. The Prandtl number links the temperature ﬁeld to the velocity ﬁeld. The third characteristic number K3 is known as the Eckert5 number: Ec :=

w02 . cpΔϑ0

(1.45)

It only aﬀects the temperature ﬁeld and only has to be taken into account when friction gives rise to a noticeable warming of the ﬂuid. This only occurs at high velocities, of the order of the speed of sound, and with large velocity gradients, such as those that appear in ﬂow through narrow slots. The dimensionless temperature ﬁeld depends on the dimensionless coordinates and these three numbers Re, P r and Ec, as well as the numbers which are necessary for describing the geometry of the heat transfer problem. The dimensionless numbers for the geometry are represented by the abbreviation Kgeom giving ϑ+ = ϑ+ x+ , y + , z + , Re, P r, Ec, Kgeom . The local Nusselt number is yielded from ϑ+ with (1.38). It is not dependent on y + , when y + is interpreted as the dimensionless distance from the wall, so that the temperature gradient at the wall is calculated at y+ = 0. Therefore (1.46) N u = f x+ , z + , Re, P r, Ec, Kgeom . The mean heat transfer coeﬃcient αm from (1.33) is also independent of x+ and z + . The mean Nusselt number N um , which contains αm , is only a function of characteristic numbers: N um =

αm L0 = F (Re, P r, Ec, Kgeom ) . λ

(1.47)

5 Ernst Rudolph Georg Eckert (1904-2004) investigated the radiation properties of solid bodies and the gases CO2 and H2 O between 1935 and 1938. In 1938 he became a lecturer at the Technische Hochschule in Braunschweig, Germany, and he also worked at the Aeronautics Research Institute there on heat transfer at high velocities. He left for the USA in 1945 and became a Professor at the University of Minnesota in 1951. He and his students explored numerous problems of heat transfer.

1.1 The diﬀerent types of heat transfer

21

As already mentioned the inﬂuence of the Eckert number only has to be considered in exceptional cases. Therefore Ec can normally be left out of (1.46) and (1.47). This will be done throughout what follows. The type of relationship between the Nusselt number and the other characteristic numbers, or the form of the functions in (1.46) and (1.47), has to be determined either through theory, the development of a suitable model or on the basis of experiments. It must also be noted that it varies from problem to problem. In the case of ﬂow in a tube, with L0 = d, the tube diameter we get

w0 d ν L αm d = Ftube , , λ ν a d or N um = Ftube (Re, P r, L/d) . For heat transfer between a sphere and the ﬂuid ﬂowing around it it follows that

w0 d ν αm d = Fsphere , λ ν a or N um = Fsphere (Re, P r) . A geometric dimensionless number does not appear here, as a sphere is already geometrically characterised by its diameter d. The functions Ftube and Fsphere have diﬀerent forms because ﬂow ﬁelds and heat transfer conditions in ﬂow through a tube diﬀer from those in a ﬂuid ﬂowing around a sphere. The geometric and ﬂow conditions are not the only parameters which have a considerable inﬂuence on the relationship between the Nusselt number and the other dimensionless numbers. The thermal boundary conditions also aﬀect heat transfer. An example of this is, with the same values of Re and P r in parallel ﬂow over a plate, we have diﬀerent Nusselt numbers for a plate kept at constant wall temperature ϑW , and for a plate with a constant heat ﬂux q˙W at the wall, where the surface temperature adjusts itself accordingly. As already mentioned, N u, Re, P r and Ec can be replaced by other dimensionless numbers which are power products of these four numbers. The P´eclet6 number can be used in place of the Reynolds number, w 0 L0 w0 cp L0 P e := = = Re P r , (1.48) a λ and can be written as the product of the Reynolds and Prandtl numbers. In american literature the Nusselt number is often replaced by the Stanton7 number St := 6

α Nu . = w0 cp Re P r

(1.49)

Jean Claude Eugene P´eclet (1793–1857) became Professor of Physics in Marseille in 1816. He moved to Paris in 1827 to take up a professorship. His famous book “Trait´e de la chaleur et de ses applications aux arts et aux manufactures” (1829) dealt with heat transfer problems and was translated into many diﬀerent languages. 7 Thomas Edward Stanton (1865–1931) was a student of Reynolds in Manchester. In 1899 he became a Professor for Engineering at the University of Bristol. Stanton researched momentum and heat transport in friction ﬂow. He also worked in aerodynamics and aeroplane construction.

22

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

The Stanton number is useful for describing heat transfer in channels, and can be interpreted in a plausible way. This is demonstrated by using a Stanton number which contains the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient Stm := αm /w0 cp , in which w0 = M˙ /Aq is the mean ﬂow velocity in a channel with constant cross sectional area Aq . The heat transferred between the channel wall (area A) and the ﬂuid is Q˙ = αm AΔϑ = M˙ cp (ϑFa − ϑFe ) , from which the Stanton number

Aq ϑFa − ϑFe A Δϑ is obtained. This gives (multiplied by the ratio of areas Aq /A) the change in temperature between entry and exit divided by the “driving” temperature diﬀerence Δϑ used in the deﬁnition of αm . If the logarithmic temperature diﬀerence from (1.35) is used it follows that Stm =

Stm =

Aq (ϑW − ϑF )e . ln A (ϑW − ϑF )a

The ratio of areas for a tube with circular cross section (diameter d) is Aq /A = d/4L. It is clear from this relationship that Stm is directly linked to the data required in the design of heat exchangers.

Up until now the material properties , η, λ and cp have been taken to be constant. This is an approximation which can only be made with small changes in the ﬂuid temperature. Although the pressure dependence of these quantities can be neglected, they vary noticeably with temperature. In order to account for this temperature dependence, further characteristic numbers must be introduced. These appear often in the form of ratios of the material properties, e.g. η(ϑF )/η(ϑW ). This can be avoided by the use of a suitable mean temperature for calculating the values of the material properties. The temperature dependence of the ﬂuid density is especially important in heat transfer caused by natural or free convection. In contrast to the previous case of forced convection, where the ﬂuid is forced at speed by a blower or pump, free convective ﬂow exists due to density changes in the earth’s gravitational ﬁeld, which originate from the variation in temperature. This is how, for example, a quiescent ﬂuid next to a hot wall is heated. The density of the ﬂuid adjacent to the wall is lowered, causing an upward ﬂow in the gravitational ﬁeld to develop. In free convection, the characteristic (forced) velocity w0 does not apply. The new physical quantity is the acceleration due to gravity g. The Reynolds number Re, which contains the reference velocity w0 , is replaced by a new group, the dimensionless acceleration due to gravity Ga :=

gL30 g 2 L3 = 02 0 , 2 ν0 η

(1.50)

known as the Galilei number. As the density changes with temperature ν = η/ must be calculated with a constant density 0 = (ϑ0 ) using a ﬁxed reference temperature ϑ0 . All other ﬂuid properties are assumed to be constant.

1.1 The diﬀerent types of heat transfer

23

At least one new characteristic number K is required to describe the density changes with temperature. This gives the following for the average Nusselt number N um = f (Ga, K , P r, Kgeom ) .

(1.51)

The density based characteristic number K and other such numbers K1 , K2, . . . characterise the dimensionless temperature dependence of the density: (ϑ+ )/ 0 = f ϑ+ , K1, K2 , . . . . Here, ϑ+ is the dimensionless temperature introduced by (1.37). With relatively small temperature diﬀerences a Taylor series

1 ∂ (ϑ) = 0 1 + (ϑ − ϑ0 ) + . . . (1.52) 0 ∂ϑ ϑ0 requiring only the linear term with the expansion coeﬃcient

1 ∂ β0 = β(ϑ0) := − 0 ∂ϑ ϑ0 can be used. Then with ϑ+ from (1.37), it follows that ϑ+ / 0 = 1 − β0 Δϑ0 ϑ+ .

(1.53)

(1.54)

Provided that the temperature diﬀerences are not too large the temperature dependence of the density can be determined by the product of the expansion coeﬃcient β0 and a characteristic temperature diﬀerence Δϑ0 . One density based characteristic group is suﬃcient for this case, namely K = β0 Δϑ0 . If the temperature diﬀerence is large further terms in (1.52) have to be considered. Instead of the one characteristic number K , two or more are needed. The density variation due to the temperature generates a buoyancy force in the gravitational ﬁeld. However, this has little inﬂuence on the other forces, including inertia and friction, which aﬀect the ﬂuid particles. As a good approximation it is suﬃcient to consider the temperature dependence of the density in buoyancy alone. This assumption is known as the Boussinesq-Approximation8 . A characteristic (volume related) lift force is g [ (ϑW ) − (ϑF )] = g ( W − F ) . 8

Joseph Valentin Boussinesq (1842–1929) gained his PhD in 1867 with a thesis on heat propagation, even though he was never a student and had taught himself science. In 1873 he became a Professor in Lille, later moving to Paris. He published over 100 scientiﬁc works, including two volumes entitled “Th´eorie analytique de la chaleur”, which appeared in Paris in 1901 and 1903.

24

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Dividing this expression by F and putting it into the Galilei number in place of g produces a new number Gr :=

gL30 W − F , νF2 F

(1.55)

called the Grashof 9 number. This combines the Galilei number and the characteristic quantity ( W − F ) / F for the temperature dependence of the density, in one number. When the Boussinesq-Approximation is valid the Nusselt number can be written as N um = f (Gr, P r, Kgeom ) .

(1.56)

The change of density with temperature can be found using (1.54), as long as the temperature diﬀerence between wall and ﬂuid further away from the wall is not too great. With ϑ0 = ϑF and Δϑ0 = (ϑW − ϑF ) one obtains W − F = βF (ϑW − ϑF ) . F The Grashof number then becomes Gr = Ga βF (ϑW − ϑF ) =

g βF (ϑW − ϑF ) L30 . ν2

(1.57)

The expansion coeﬃcient β has to be calculated at the ﬂuid temperature ϑF . In order to account for the temperature dependence of ν, it must be determined at an average temperature between ϑW and ϑF . According to (1.56) and (1.57) the Nusselt number depends on the temperature diﬀerence (ϑW − ϑF ). Although the heat transfer coeﬃcient α is found by dividing the heat ﬂux q˙W by this temperature diﬀerence, cf. (1.24), in free convection α is not independent of (ϑW − ϑF ). In other words the transferred heat ﬂux, q˙W , does not increase proportionally to ϑW − ϑF . This is because ϑW − ϑF is not only the “driving force” for the heat ﬂow but also for the buoyancy, and therefore the velocity ﬁeld in free convection. In contrast, the heat transfer coeﬃcient for forced convection is not expected to show any dependence on the temperature diﬀerence. 9 Franz Grashof (1826–1893) taught from 1863 until 1891 as Professor of Theoretical Mechanical Engineering at the Technische Hochschule in Karlsruhe, Germany. His work written with mathematical rigor, especially dealt with mechanics and technical thermodynamics. His major publication “Theoretische Maschinenlehre”, consisted of three volumes and appeared between 1875 and 1890. It is a comprehensive, expert portrayal of mechanical engineering. In 1856 Grashof founded the “Verein Deutscher Ingenieure” (VDI), the association of German Engineers along with 22 other young engineers. He was its ﬁrst director and for many years also the editor of the association’s technical magazine in which he published 42 papers in total.

1.1 The diﬀerent types of heat transfer

1.1.5

25

Thermal radiation

All forms of matter emit energy to their surroundings through electromagnetic waves. This already happens because the matter has a positive thermodynamic temperature. This type of energy release is known as thermal radiation or heat radiation. The emission of radiation is due to the conversion of the body’s internal energy into energy which is transported by electromagnetic waves. When electromagnetic waves hit any matter, part of the energy is absorbed, the rest is then either reﬂected or transmitted. The radiation energy which is absorbed by the body is converted into internal energy. Thermal radiation causes a special type of heat transfer which is known as radiative exchange. The transport of radiation does not require any matter as electromagnetic waves can also travel through a vacuum. This allows heat to be transferred between two bodies over great distances. In this way the earth receives a large energy ﬂow from the sun. Gases and liquids are partly transparent to thermal radiation. Therefore emission and absorption of radiation takes place inside the gas or liquid space. In gases and liquids emission and absorption are volumetric eﬀects. In contrast, on the surface of a solid object, radiation is completely absorbed within a very thin layer (a few micrometres). Radiation from the interior of a solid body does not penetrate the surface, emission is limited to a thin surface layer. It can therefore be said that emission and absorption of radiation by a solid body are surface eﬀects. This means that it is allowed to speak of radiating and absorbing surfaces rather than correctly of radiating solid bodies. There is an upper limit for the emission of heat radiation, which only depends on the thermodynamic temperature T of the radiating body. The maximum heat ﬂux from the surface of a radiating body is given by q˙s = σT 4 .

(1.58)

This law was found 1879 by J. Stefan10 as a result of many experiments and was derived in 1884 by L. Boltzmann11 from the electromagnetic theory of radiation using the second law of thermodynamics. It contains an universal constant, known as the Stefan-Boltzmann constant σ, which has a value of σ = (5.670400 ± 0.00004)10−8 W/m2 K4 . 10 Josef Stefan (1835–1893) became Professor of Physics at the University of Vienna in 1863. He was an excellent researcher and published numerous papers on heat conduction and diﬀusion in ﬂuids, ice formation, and the connection between surface tension and evaporation. He suggested the T 4 -law after careful evaluation of lots of earlier experiments on the emission of heat from hot bodies. 11 Ludwig Boltzmann (1844–1906) gained his PhD in 1867 as a scholar of J. Stefan in Vienna. He was a physics professor in Graz, Munich, Leipzig and Vienna. His main area of work was the kinetic theory of gases and its relationship with the second law of thermodynamics. In 1877 he found the fundamental relation between the entropy of a system and the logarithm of the number of possible molecular distributions which make up the macroscopic state of the system.

26

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

An emitter, whose emissive power, or heat ﬂux emitted by radiation, reaches the maximum value q˙s in (1.58), is called a black body. This is an ideal emitter whose emissive power cannot be surpassed by any other body at the same temperature. On the other hand, a black body absorbs all incident radiation, and is, therefore, an ideal absorber. The emissive power of real radiators can be described by using a correction factor in (1.58). By putting q˙ = ε(T )σT 4 ,

(1.59)

the emissivity ε(T ) ≤ 1 of the radiator is deﬁned. This material property, emissivity, does not only depend on the material concerned but also on the condition of the surface, for example its roughness. Some values for ε are compiled in Table 1.3. Table 1.3: Emissivity ε(T ) of some materials

Material Concrete, rough Wood, oak Brick, red Aluminium, rolled

T in K 293 293 293 443

ε 0.94 0.90 0.93 0.049

Material Nickel, polished Iron, shiny corroded Copper, oxidised

T in K 373 423 403

ε 0.053 0.158 0.725

When radiation hits a body, some of it will be reﬂected, some absorbed and some transmitted. These portions are represented by the reﬂectivity r, the absorptivity a, and the transmissivity τ . These three dimensionless quantities are not purely properties of the irradiated material, they also depend on the kind of radiation which strikes the body. Of main inﬂuence is the distribution of radiation over the wave length spectrum of the electromagnetic waves incident on the material. However it can always be said that r+a+τ =1 .

(1.60)

Most solid bodies are opaque, they do not allow any radiation to be transmitted, so with τ = 0 the absorptivity from (1.60) is a = 1 − r. The absorption of thermal radiation will be treated in more depth in chapter 5. The connection between emission and absorption will also be looked at; this is known as Kirchhoﬀ’s law, see section 5.1.6. It basically says that a good emitter of radiation is also a good absorber. For the ideal radiator, the black body, both absorptivity a and emissivity ε are equal to the maximum value of one. The black body, which absorbs all incident radiation (a = 1), also emits more than any other radiator, agreeing with (1.58), the law from Stefan and Boltzmann.

1.1 The diﬀerent types of heat transfer

1.1.6

27

Radiative exchange

In heat transfer, the heat transmitted by radiation between two bodies at diﬀerent temperatures is very important. It is not only the hotter body that radiates heat to warm the body at the lower temperature, the colder one also emits electromagnetic waves which transfer energy to the body at the higher temperature. It is therefore applicable here to talk of an exchange of radiation. Finally the net heat ﬂow from the body at the higher temperature to that at the lower temperature is of interest. The evaluation of the heat ﬂow is diﬃcult for a number of reasons. In general, other bodies will also play a part in radiative exchange. A body may not absorb all the radiation that hits it, part of it may be reﬂected and could hit the original emitter. This complicated interplay between two radiators becomes even more complex when the medium between the two bodies absorbs part of the radiation passing through it and emits energy itself. This is the case in so called gas radiation and must be considered, for example, in heat transfer in a furnace.

Fig. 1.11: Radiative exchange between a body at temperature T and black surroundings at temperature TS

As an introduction, a simple case of radiative exchange will be looked at. A radiator with area A, and at temperature T , is located in surroundings which are at temperature TS, see Fig. 1.11. The medium between the two shall have no eﬀect on the radiation transfer; it shall be completely transparent for radiation, which is a very good approximation for atmospheric air. The surroundings shall behave like a black body, absorbing all radiation, aS = 1. The heat ﬂow emitted by the radiator Q˙ em = A ε σ T 4 reaches the black surroundings and is completely absorbed. The black radiation emitted by the surroundings will be partly absorbed by the radiator at temperature T , the rest will be reﬂected back to, and absorbed by the surroundings. The heat absorbed by the radiator is Q˙ ab = A a σ TS4 , where a is the absorptivity of the radiator at temperature T , for the black body radiation of temperature TS . The absorptivity a is not a property of the material alone, as it is not only dependent on the properties of the absorbing surface, but

28

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

also on the source and type of incident radiation. In the example, this is the black body radiation coming from the surroundings which is completely characterised by the temperature TS . ˙ from the radiator to the surroundings enclosing it is The net ﬂow of heat Q, Q˙ = Q˙ em − Q˙ ab = Aσ εT 4 − aTS4 . (1.61) In many cases a simple assumption is made about the radiator: it is treated as a grey radiator. This is only an approximation but it simpliﬁes matters greatly. The absorptivity of a grey radiator does not depend on the type of incident radiation, and it always agrees with the emissivity, such that a = ε. For a grey radiator in black surroundings (1.61) simpliﬁes to (1.62) Q˙ = Aσε T 4 − TS4 . The diﬀerence between the fourth power of the temperature of the emitter and that of the body which receives the radiation, is characteristic of radiative exchange. This temperature dependence is found in numerous radiative heat transfer problems involving grey radiators. In many applications heat transfer by convection must be considered in addition to radiative heat transfer. This is, for example, the case where a radiator releases heat to a room which is at a lower temperature. Radiative heat exchange takes place between the radiator and the walls of the room, whilst at the same time heat is transferred to the air by convection. These two kinds of heat transfer are parallel to each other and so the heat ﬂow by convection and that by radiation are added together in order to ﬁnd the total heat exchanged. The heat ﬂux then becomes q˙ = q˙conv + q˙rad or

q˙ = α (T − TA ) + εσ T 4 − TS4 .

(1.63)

Here, α is the heat transfer coeﬃcient for the convective heat transfer to air at temperature TA . Equation (1.62) was used to evaluate q˙rad . Normally TA ≈ TS, allowing the convective and radiative parts of heat transfer to be put together. This gives q˙ = (α + αrad ) (T − TS ) .

(1.64)

The radiative heat transfer coeﬃcient deﬁned above, becomes from (1.63) αrad = εσ

T 4 − TS4 = εσ T 2 + TS2 T + TS . T − TS

(1.65)

This quantity is dependent on the emissivity ε, and both temperatures T and TS . The introduction of αrad allows the inﬂuence of radiation to be compared to convection. As ε ≤ 1 is always true, it is immediately obvious that an upper limit for the radiative part of heat transfer exists.

1.1 The diﬀerent types of heat transfer

29

Example 1.2: A poorly insulated horizontal pipe (outer diameter d = 0.100 m), with a surface temperature ϑW = 44 ◦ C, runs through a large room of quiescent air at ϑA = 18 ◦ C. ˙ The heat loss per length L of the pipe, Q/L has to be determined. The pipe is taken to behave as a grey radiator with emissivity ε = 0.87. The walls of the room are treated as black surroundings which are at temperature ϑS = ϑA = 18 ◦ C. The tube gives oﬀ heat to the air by free convection and to the surrounding walls by radiation. Then from (1.64) with ϑS = ϑA comes ˙ Q/L = πd (q˙conv + q˙rad ) = πd (αm + αrad ) (ϑW − ϑA ) ,

(1.66)

where αm is the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient for free convection. The heat transfer coeﬃcient for radiation, using the data given and (1.65) is αrad = εσ

4 − TA4 W 3174 − 2914 3 TW W K = 5.55 2 . = 0.87 · 5.67 · 10−8 2 4 TW − TA m K 317 − 291 m K

For heat transfer by free convection from a horizontal pipe S.W. Churchill and H.H.S. Chu [1.3] give the dimensionless relationship 2 αm d 0.387(GrP r)1/6 N um = (1.67) = 0.60 + 8/27 λ 1 + (0.559/P r)9/16 which has the same form as Eq. (1.56), that of N um = f (Gr, P r). According to (1.57) the Grashof number is gβ (ϑW − ϑL ) d3 Gr = . ν2 The expansion coeﬃcient β has to be calculated for the air temperature ϑA . As air can be treated as an ideal gas, therefore β = 1/TA = 0.00344 K−1 . To take the temperature dependence of the material properties into account, ν, λ and P r all have to be calculated at the mean temperature ϑm = 12 (ϑW + ϑA ). For air at ϑm = 31 ◦ C, ν = 16.40·10−6 m2 /s, λ = 0.0265 W/Km and P r = 0.713. This gives 9.81 m/s2 0.00344 K−1 (44 − 18) K · 0.1003 m3 Gr = = 3.26 · 106 . 16.402 · 10−12 m4 /s2 Using (1.67) the Nusselt number is N um = 18.48, out of which comes the heat transfer coeﬃcient 0.0265 W/Km W λ αm = N um = 18.48 = 4.90 2 . d 0.100 m m K ˙ Eq.(1.66) gives the heat loss as Q/L = 85.4 W/m. The heat transfer coeﬃcients αm and αrad are approximately equal. This infers that free convection to the air and radiative exchange transport almost the same amount of heat. This is not true for forced convection, where αm , depending on the ﬂow velocity, is one to two powers of ten larger than the value calculated here. However, αrad remains unaﬀected and when compared to αm can generally be neglected. Example 1.3: Seen from the sun the earth with its atmosphere appears like a disc of radius R = D/2 directed perpendicular to the sun; D being the earth’s diameter. This disc receives from the sun a heat ﬂux E0 = 1367 W/m2 , the so-called solar constant. Part of this heat ﬂux is reﬂected from the earth’s surface. The rest is absorbed. A mean reﬂectivity, also known as albedo, is rS = 0.3, hence the absorptivity is aS = 1 − rS = 0.7. Because of its temperature T the earth emits heat into the outer space over its entire surface in form of long wave radiation with a mean reﬂectivity r = 1 − a, where a = 0.39 is the mean absorptivity of long wave radiation.

30

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Determine the mean temperature of the earth’s surface under steady state conditions. What would be its mean surface temperature provided that the earth’s atmosphere did not exist? From the irradiated heat ﬂux the part Q˙ 0 = R2πE0 aS is absorbed. In steady state it is equal to the emitted part Q˙ 1 = 4πR2 σT 4 r = 4πR2 σt4 (1 − a). Equalising both heat ﬂuxes delivers a mean earth temperature of

T =

E0 aS 4σ(1 − a)

1/4 =

1367 W/m2 · 0.7aS 4 · 5.67 · 10−8 W/(m2 K4 ) · (1 − 0.39)

1/4 = 288.4 K

or a Celsius temperature of ϑ = 15.2 ◦ C. Did the earth’s atmosphere not exist, then we had a = 0, and a mean surface temperature T = 254.9 K, or a Celsius temperature of ϑ = −18.3 ◦ C.

1.2 Overall heat transfer

1.2

31

Overall heat transfer

In many applications of heat transfer two ﬂuids at diﬀerent temperatures are separated by a solid wall. Heat is transferred from the ﬂuid at the higher temperature to the wall, conducted through the wall, and then ﬁnally transferred from the cold side of the wall into the ﬂuid at the lower temperature. This series of convective and conductive heat transfer processes is known as overall heat transfer. Overall heat transfer takes place, above all in heat exchangers, which will be dealt with in section 1.3. Here, for example, a hot ﬂuid ﬂowing in a tube gives heat up, via the wall, to the colder ﬂuid ﬂowing around the outside of the tube. House walls are also an example for overall heat transfer. They separate the warm air inside from the colder air outside. The resistance to heat transfer should be as large as possible, so that despite the temperature diﬀerence between inside and outside, only a small amount of heat will be lost through the walls. In contrast to this case, the heat transfer resistances present in a heat exchanger should be kept as small as possible; here a great amount of heat shall be transferred with a small temperature diﬀerence between the two ﬂuids in order to keep thermodynamic (exergy) losses as small as possible. As these examples show, the calculation of the overall heat transfer is of signiﬁcant technical importance. This problem is dealt with in the next sections.

1.2.1

The overall heat transfer coeﬃcient

The following analysis is based on the situation shown in Fig. 1.12: A ﬂat or curved wall separates a ﬂuid at temperature ϑ1 from another with a temperature ˙ ﬂows from ﬂuid 1 through the wall to ﬂuid 2, ϑ2 < ϑ1 . At steady state heat Q, as a result of the temperature diﬀerence ϑ1 − ϑ2. The heat ﬂow Q˙ is transferred from ﬂuid 1 to the wall which has an area A1 and is at temperature ϑW1 . With α1 as the heat transfer coeﬃcient, it follows from section 1.1.3 that Q˙ = α1A1 (ϑ1 − ϑW1 ) .

(1.68)

For the conduction through the wall, according to section 1.1.2 λm Q˙ = Am (ϑW1 − ϑW2 ) . δ

(1.69)

Here λm is the mean thermal conductivity of the wall according to (1.11), δ its thickness and Am the average area calculated from (1.15). Finally an analogous relationship to (1.68) exists for the heat transfer from the wall to ﬂuid 2 Q˙ = α2A2 (ϑW2 − ϑ2 ) .

(1.70)

32

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Fig. 1.12: Temperature proﬁle for heat transfer through a tube wall bounded by two ﬂuids with temperatures ϑ1 and ϑ2 < ϑ1

The unknown wall temperatures ϑW1 and ϑW2 , can be eliminated from the ˙ This means that Q˙ can be calculated by knowing only the three equations for Q. ﬂuid temperatures ϑ1 and ϑ2. This results in Q˙ = kA (ϑ1 − ϑ2 )

(1.71)

where

δ 1 1 1 + + (1.72) = kA α1 A1 λm Am α2 A2 is valid. The overall heat transfer coeﬃcient k, for the area A is deﬁned in (1.71), where A is the size of any reference area. Equation (1.72) shows that kA can be calculated using the quantities already introduced for convective heat transfer and conduction.

As shown by Eqs. (1.71) and (1.72), only the product kA is used. Giving k alone, without stating anything about the size of the area A is meaningless. As A can be chosen to be any area, k takes on the value associated with the choice of A. In practice values for k are often given and used. This can be seen for example in German building regulations (Norm DIN 4108) where a minimum value for k is set for house walls. This is to guarantee a suﬃcient degree of insulation in each house that is built. This sort of statement of k is tacitly related to a certain area. For ﬂat walls this is the area of the wall A1 = A2 = Am ; for tubes mostly the outer surface A2 , which does not normally diﬀer greatly from A1 or Am . In what follows, only the product kA will be used so that A will not need to be speciﬁed. In exceptional cases a value for k will be given along with a value for the related area.

In (1.72), (1/kA) represents the resistance to overall heat transfer. It is made up of the single resistances of each transfer process in the series; the resistance to convective transfer between ﬂuid 1 and the wall, (1/α1 A1 ), the conduction resistance in the wall, (δ/λm Am ) and the resistance to convective transfer between the wall and ﬂuid 2, (1/α2 A2 ). This series approach for overall heat transfer resistance is analogous to that in electrical circuits, where the total resistance to the current is found by the addition of all the single resistances in series. Therefore, the three resistances which the heat ﬂow Q˙ must pass through, are added together. These three are the resistance due to the boundary layer in ﬂuid 1, the conduction resistance in the wall and the resistance to transfer associated with the boundary layer in ﬂuid 2.

1.2 Overall heat transfer

33

The temperature drop due to these thermal resistances behaves in exactly the same manner as the voltage drop in an electrical resistor, it increases as the resistance goes up and as the current becomes stronger. From (1.68) to (1.72) it follows that ϑ1 − ϑW1 ϑW1 − ϑW2 ϑW2 − ϑ2 ϑ1 − ϑ2 . Q˙ = = = = 1 1 1 δ α1 A1 α2 A2 kA λm Am

(1.73)

From this the temperature drop in the wall and the boundary layers on both sides can be calculated. To ﬁnd the wall temperatures the equations ϑW1 = ϑ1 −

kA Q˙ (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) = ϑ1 − α1 A1 α1 A1

(1.74)

ϑW2 = ϑ2 +

kA Q˙ (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) = ϑ2 + α2 A2 α 2 A2

(1.75)

and

are used. For the overall heat transfer through a pipe, (1.72) can be applied, when it is taken into account that a pipe of diameter d and length L has a surface area of A = πdL. Then from (1.72) it follows with Am from (1.15) that

ln d2 /d1 1 1 1 1 (1.76) + + = kA πL α1 d1 2λm α 2 d2 where d1 is the inner and d2 the outer diameter of the pipe.

1.2.2

Multi-layer walls

The analogy to electrical circuits is also used to extend the relationships derived in section 1.2.1 for overall heat transfer, to walls with several layers. Walls with two or more layers are often used in technical practice. A good example of these multi-layer walls is the addition of an insulating layer made from a material with low thermal conductivity λis . Fig. 1.13 shows a temperature proﬁle for a wall that consists of a number of layers. The resistance to heat transfer for each layer in series is added together and this gives the overall heat transfer resistance for the wall as δi 1 1 1 + + . (1.77) = kA α1 A1 λ A α mi mi 2 A2 i In curved walls the average area of a layer Ami is calculated using the inner and outer areas of the section using (1.15). Applying (1.77), for the overall resistance to heat transfer, it is assumed that each layer touches its neighbour so closely that there is no noticeable temperature diﬀerence between the layers. If this was not

34

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Fig. 1.13: Temperature proﬁle for overall heat transfer through a ﬂat wall of three layers of different materials

true a thermal contact resistance, similar to the contact resistance that appears in electric circuits, would have to be considered. The temperature drop ϑi − ϑi+1 in the i-th layer is proportional to the heat ﬂow and the resistance to conduction. This is analogous to a voltage drop across a resistor in an electric circuit. It follows that δi ϑi − ϑi+1 = Q˙ . (1.78) λmi Ami Using Q˙ from (1.71) and (1.77), ϑi − ϑi+1 is fairly simple to calculate. The surface temperatures ϑW1 and ϑW2 are calculated in exactly the same way as before using (1.74) and (1.75) In tubes which consist of several layers e.g. the actual tube plus its insulation, (1.77) is extended to n 1 1 1 1 1 di+1 1 = . (1.79) + ln + kA πL α1d1 2 i=1 λmi di α2 dn+1 The i-th layer is bounded by the diameters di and di+1 . The ﬁrst and last layers, which are in contact with the ﬂuid, can also be layers of dirt or scale which develop during lengthy operation and represent an additional conductive resistance to the transfer of heat.

1.2.3

Overall heat transfer through walls with extended surfaces

The overall resistance to heat transfer (1/kA) is found by adding all the resistances to convective heat transfer and conduction, as shown in (1.72). Therefore the largest single resistance determines the value for (1/kA). This is especially distinct when the other resistances are very small. It is therefore possible to signiﬁcantly improve the insulation of a wall by adding a layer which has high resistance to conduction δ/λm Am , or in other words a thick layer of a material with low thermal conductivity.

1.2 Overall heat transfer

35

If, however, the heat transfer must be as good as possible, a good example being a heat exchanger, a high convective resistance (1/αA) can be an impediment. The main cause of a large resistance is a small heat transfer coeﬃcient α. Unfortunately even with signiﬁcant increases in ﬂow velocity, α barely increases. This leaves only one option for reducing (1/αA), which is to increase the area A available for heat transfer by the addition of ﬁns, rods, or pins on the side where heat transfer is “bad”. Examples of these extended surfaces are shown in Fig. 1.14. Surface extension will lead to a remarkable increase of the original area, in some cases by 10-100 times.

Fig. 1.14: Examples of extended surface, a straight ﬁns, b pins, c circular ﬁns

The overall heat transfer resistance is not reduced by the same degree. The increased heat transfer area brings with it an additional conduction resistance. The heat which is absorbed by the ﬂuid from an area near the ﬁn tip, has to be transported to the vicinity of the tip by conduction. This requires a temperature diﬀerence between the ﬁn base and its tip as a driving force. As a consequence of this the ﬁns (or any other forms of extended surface) have an average temperature below that of the ﬁnless base material. Therefore the ﬁns are not completely eﬀective, because the heat transfer between ﬁn and ﬂuid takes place with a smaller temperature diﬀerence than that between the base material and the ﬂuid. To calculate the eﬀectiveness of extended surfaces we consider Fig. 1.15. The

Fig. 1.15: Temperature in a ﬁnned wall along the line AB. ϑf is the average temperature of the ﬁn.

36

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

heat ﬂow Q˙ into Fluid 2 is made up of two parts: Q˙ = Q˙ g + Q˙ f . The heat ﬂow Q˙ g removed from the surface Ag of the ﬁnless base material (ground material) is Q˙ g = αg Ag (ϑW2 − ϑ2 ) , (1.80) where αg is the associated heat transfer coeﬃcient. The temperature in the ﬁn falls from ϑ0 at the base of the ﬁn (x = 0) to ϑh at its tip (x = h). With ϑf as the average ﬁn temperature the heat ﬂow Q˙ f transferred to the ﬂuid from the ﬁn surface area Af will be Q˙ f = αf Af (ϑf − ϑ2 ) , where αf is the (average) heat transfer coeﬃcient between ﬁn and ﬂuid. If the ﬁn was at the same temperature all over as at its base ϑ0 , then the heat ﬂow would be given as Q˙ f0 = αf Af (ϑ0 − ϑ2 ) . The eﬀectiveness of the ﬁn is described by the ﬁn eﬃciency ηf :=

Q˙ f ϑf − ϑ2 = ϑ0 − ϑ 2 Q˙ f0

(1.81)

and it then follows that Q˙ f = αf ηf Af (ϑ0 − ϑ2 ) .

(1.82)

The ﬁn eﬃciency is always less than one. It depends on both the conduction processes in the ﬁn and the convective heat transfer, which inﬂuence each other. Therefore, the geometry of the ﬁn, the thermal conductivity λf , and the heat transfer coeﬃcient αf play a role in the calculation of the ﬁn eﬃciency. This will be discussed in detail in 2.2.4. The temperature of the ﬁn base ϑ0 is diﬀerent from that of the surface where no ﬁns are present, ϑW2 . The heat ﬂux through the ﬁn base into the ﬁn is signiﬁcantly higher than the ﬂux from the base material, i.e. the wall, into the ﬂuid. The temperature drop which appears underneath the ﬁn causes a periodic temperature proﬁle to develop in the base material. This is shown schematically in Fig. 1.16. As a simpliﬁcation this complicated temperature change is neglected, such that ϑ0 = ϑW2 ,

(1.83)

Fig. 1.16: Periodic temperature proﬁle along the line CD. ϑ0 average temperature of the ﬁn base, ϑW2 average temperature of the surface of the base material between the ﬁns

1.2 Overall heat transfer

37

thereby assuming an isothermal temperature distribution under the ﬁns and on the surface between the ﬁns. This simpliﬁcation leads to an overestimation of the heat ﬂow which is transferred. The heat ﬂow calculated can be as much as 25% bigger than it actually is, as shown ﬁrst by O. Krischer and W. Kast [1.4], and later by E.M. Sparrow and D.K. Hennecke [1.5] as well as E.M. Sparrow and L. Lee [1.6]. In many cases this error will be less than 5%, particularly if the ﬁns are thick and placed very close together. We assume (1.83) to be valid and from (1.80) and (1.82), using this simpliﬁcation, we obtain Q˙ = Q˙ g + Q˙ f = (αg Ag + αf ηf Af ) (ϑ0 − ϑ2) .

(1.84)

The ﬁn is not eﬀective over its total surface area Af , only over the smaller surface area ηf Af , reduced with the ﬁn eﬃciency. Normally we have Af Ag , so in the ﬁrst bracket of (1.84) the second term is the most important, despite ηf < 1. It is therefore possible to set αg ≈ αf without incurring large errors. This then gives Q˙ = αf (Ag + ηf Af ) (ϑ0 − ϑ2 ) .

(1.85)

The overall resistance of a ﬁnned wall, taking into account (1.68), (1.69) and (1.71), is given by 1 1 δ 1 = . + + kA α1 A1 λm Am αf (Ag + ηf Af )

(1.86)

Here δ is the thickness, λm the average thermal conductivity, and Am the average area of the wall without ﬁns. Overall heat transfer for ﬁnned walls can be calculated using the same relationships as for an unﬁnned wall. The only change being that the ﬁn area multiplied by the ﬁn eﬃciency replaces the surface area of the ﬁns in the equations. Example 1.4: A pipe made from an aluminium alloy (λm = 205 W/K m) has an inner diameter of d1 = 22 mm and an outer diameter d2 = 25 mm. Water at ϑ1 = 60 ◦ C ﬂows inside the pipe, whilst air at ϑ2 = 25 ◦ C ﬂows around the outside of the pipe perpendicular to its axis. Typical heat transfer coeﬃcients are α1 = 6150 W/m2 K and α2 = 95 W/m2 K. ˙ The heat ﬂow per length of the pipe Q/L is to be calculated. From (1.76)

1 d2 1 1 1 1 + ln + = kA πL α1 d1 2λm d1 α2 d2 1 Km 0.1365 K m = (0.0074 + 0.0003 + 0.4211) = πL W L W and from (1.71) ˙ Q/L = (kA/L) (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) = 256 W/m . The overall heat transfer resistance (1/kA) is determined by the convection resistance on the outside of the pipe as this is the largest value. This resistance can be reduced by attaching ﬁns. Fins in the form of annular discs with outer diameter df = 60 mm, thickness δf = 1 mm and a separation of tf = 6 mm have been chosen for this case. The number of ﬁns is n = L/tf . The ﬁnless outer surface of the tube is Ag = π d2 (L − n δf ) = π d2 L (1 − δf /tf )

38

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

and the surface area of the ﬁns is Af = 2n

πL 2 π 2 d − d22 = d − d22 . 4 f 2 tf f

The narrow surface of width δf at the top of the ﬁn has been neglected because it is only slightly hotter than the air and therefore its contribution to the heat transfer is insigniﬁcant. The surface area of the ﬁnned tube in comparison to that without ﬁns A0 = πd2 L, is increased by a factor of (Ag + Af )/A0 = 10.75. The ﬁn surfaces are not completely eﬀective for heat transfer. Taking αf = α2 and a ﬁn eﬃciency of ηf = 0.55 gives according to (1.86)

1 d2 πL 1 1 1 + ln + = kA πL α1 d1 2λm d1 αf (Ag + ηf Af ) Km 0.0238 K m 1 (0.0074 + 0.0003 + 0.0670) = . = πL W L W The resistance to heat transfer on the outside of the tube is still the greatest resistance, but with the attachment of the ﬁns it has been signiﬁcantly reduced. The heat ﬂow is ˙ Q/L = 1472 W/m. The surface area enlargement by a factor of 10.75 has increased the heat ﬂow by a factor of 5.75.

1.2.4

Heating and cooling of thin walled vessels

The relationships for steady heat ﬂow can also be applied to the solution of a transient heat transfer problem, namely to the calculation of the temperature change with time during the heating and cooling of a thin walled vessel ﬁlled with a liquid. Two simpliﬁcations have to be made: 1. The temperature of the liquid inside the vessel is the same throughout, it only changes with time: ϑF = ϑF (t). 2. The heat stored in the vessel wall, or more precisely the change in its internal energy, can be neglected. The ﬁrst assumption is true for most cases, as free or forced convection due to an agitator in the vessel, lead to almost the same temperature throughout the liquid. The second is only correct when the heat capacity of the contents is much larger than the heat capacity of the vessel wall. This happens in the heating and cooling of liquids in thin walled vessels, but may not be applied to vessels containing gases, which have either thick or well insulated walls. When both these assumptions are valid, at every point in time the temperature of the ﬂuid is spatially uniform, and the wall temperature will be predicted by the equations valid for steady state. In a ﬂat vessel wall the temperature changes linearly, however the straight line moves according to time. The process of cooling, as in Fig. 1.17, will now be considered. The heat ﬂow ˙ Q(t) transferred from the liquid at temperature ϑF (t), through the vessel wall, to the surroundings which are at a constant temperature ϑS , is given by ˙ Q(t) = kA [ϑF (t) − ϑS]

(1.87)

1.2 Overall heat transfer

39

Fig. 1.17: Temperature proﬁle for the cooling of a thin walled vessel

The overall heat transfer coeﬃcient k can be calculated using (1.72). According to the ﬁrst law, the heat Q˙ ﬂowing out of the liquid causes a reduction of the internal energy UF of the ﬂuid in the vessel: dϑF dUF ˙ = −MF cF . Q(t) =− dt dt

(1.88)

Here, MF is the mass and cF is the speciﬁc heat capacity of the liquid, which is assumed to be constant. The ordinary diﬀerential equation for the liquid temperature follows on from (1.87) and (1.88): kA dϑF + (ϑF − ϑS ) = 0 . dt MF cF The solution with the initial conditions ϑF = ϑF0

at time t = 0

becomes, in dimensionless form ϑ+ F

ϑ F − ϑS kA := = exp − t . ϑF0 − ϑS MF cF

(1.89)

The liquid temperature falls exponentially from its initial value ϑF0 to the temperature of the surroundings ϑS . Fig. 1.18 shows temperature plots for diﬀerent values of the decay time t0 := MF cF /kA . (1.90) This decay time appears in Fig. 1.18 as the subtangent to the curve at any time, in particular at the time t = 0. The heating of the vessel contents shall begin at time t = 0, when the whole container is at the same temperature as the surroundings: ϑF = ϑS

for t = 0 .

(1.91)

A heat ﬂow Q˙ H = Q˙ H (t), that can be an arbitrary function of time, shall be added ˙ to the liquid for all t ≥ 0. The heat ﬂow Q(t) lost through the thin vessel walls is found using (1.87). These two quantities enter the balance equation

40

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Fig. 1.18: Liquid temperature ϑ+ F variation over time according to (1.89) with t0 from (1.90) during the cooling of a vessel

dUF ˙ + Q˙ H (t) , = −Q(t) dt from which the diﬀerential equation follows as dϑF kA Q˙ H (t) + (ϑF − ϑS ) = . dt MF cF MF cF Its general solution, with the initial condition from (1.91), is t ˙ QH (t) ϑF = ϑS + exp(−t/t0 ) exp(t/t0 ) dt MF cF

(1.92)

0

with t0 from (1.90). If the heat load Q˙ H is assumed to be constant, it follows from (1.92) that Q˙ H ϑF = ϑ S + 1 − exp (−t/t0 ) . kA After a long period of time has elapsed (t → ∞), the temperature of the liquid reaches the value Q˙ H ϑF∞ = ϑS + . kA Then the heat ﬂow added just counterbalances the heat loss through the wall Q˙ from (1.87): a steady state is reached.

1.3

Heat exchangers

When energy, as heat, has to be transferred from one stream of ﬂuid to another both ﬂuids are directed through an apparatus known as a heat exchanger. The

1.3 Heat exchangers

41

two streams are separated by a barrier, normally the wall of a tube or pipe, through which heat is transferred from the ﬂuid at the higher temperature to the colder one. Calculations involving heat exchangers use the equations derived in section 1.2 for overall heat transfer. In addition to these relationships, the energy balances of the ﬁrst law of thermodynamics link the heat transferred with the enthalpy changes and therefore the temperature changes in both the ﬂuids. Heat exchangers exist in many diﬀerent forms, and can normally be diﬀerentiated by the ﬂow regimes of the two ﬂuids. These diﬀerent types will be discussed in the ﬁrst part of this section. This will be followed by a section on the equations used in heat exchanger design. These equations can be formulated in a favourable manner using dimensionless groups. The calculation of countercurrent, cocurrent and cross current exchangers will then be explained. The ﬁnal section contains information on combinations of these three basic ﬂow regimes which are used in practice. The calculation, design and application of heat exchangers is covered comprehensively in other books, in particular the publications from H. Hausen [1.7], H. Martin [1.8] as well as W. Roetzel [1.9] should be noted. The following sections serve only as an introduction to this extensive area of study, and particular emphasis has been placed on the thermal engineering calculation methods.

1.3.1

Types of heat exchanger and ﬂow conﬁgurations

One of the simplest designs for a heat exchanger is the double pipe heat exchanger which is schematically illustrated in Fig. 1.19. It consists of two concentric tubes, where ﬂuid 1 ﬂows through the inner pipe and ﬂuid 2 ﬂows in the annular space between the two tubes. Two diﬀerent ﬂow regimes are possible, either countercurrent where the two ﬂuids ﬂow in opposite directions, Fig. 1.19a, or cocurrent as in Fig. 1.19b. Fig. 1.19 also shows the cross-sectional mean values of the ﬂuid temperatures ϑ1 and ϑ2 over the whole length of the heat exchanger. The entry temperatures are indicated by one dash, and the exit temperature by two dashes. At every cross-section ϑ1 > ϑ2 , when ﬂuid 1 is the hotter of the two. In countercurrent ﬂow the two ﬂuids leave the tube at opposite ends, and so the exit temperature of the hot ﬂuid can be lower than the exit temperature of the colder ﬂuid (ϑ1 < ϑ2 ), because only the conditions ϑ1 > ϑ2 and ϑ1 > ϑ2 must be met. A marked cooling of ﬂuid 1 or a considerable temperature rise in ﬂuid 2 is not possible with cocurrent ﬂow. In this case the exit temperatures of both ﬂuids occur at the same end of the exchanger and so ϑ1 > ϑ2 is always the case, no matter how long the exchanger is. This is the ﬁrst indication that countercurrent ﬂow is superior to cocurrent ﬂow: not all heat transfer tasks carried out in countercurrent ﬂow can be realised in cocurrent ﬂow. In addition to this fact, it will be shown in section 1.3.3, that for the transfer of the same heat ﬂow, a countercurrent heat exchanger always has

42

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Fig. 1.19: Fluid temperatures ϑ1 and ϑ2 in a double-pipe heat exchanger. a countercurrent ﬂow, b cocurrent ﬂow

a smaller area than a cocurrent exchanger, assuming of course, that the both ﬂow regimes are suitable to fulﬁll the task. Therefore, cocurrent ﬂow is seldom used in practice. In practical applications the shell-and-tube heat exchanger, as shown in Fig. 1.20 is the most commonly used design. One of the ﬂuids ﬂows in the many parallel tubes which make up a tube bundle. The tube bundle is surrounded by a shell. The second ﬂuid ﬂows around the outside of the tubes within this shell. Countercurrent ﬂow can be realised here except at the ends at of the heat exchanger where the shell side ﬂuid enters or leaves the exchanger. The addition of baﬄes, as in Fig. 1.21, forces the shell side ﬂuid to ﬂow perpendicular to the tube bundle, which leads to higher heat transfer coeﬃcients than those found in

Fig. 1.20: Shell-and-tube heat exchanger (schematic)

Fig. 1.21: Shell-and-tube heat exchanger with baﬄes

1.3 Heat exchangers

43

Fig. 1.22: Scheme of a plate exchanger with crossﬂow

ﬂow along the tubes. In the sections between the baﬄes the ﬂuid is neither in counter or cocurrent ﬂow but in crossﬂow. Pure crossﬂow is found in ﬂat plate heat exchangers, as indicated by Fig. 1.22. The temperatures of both ﬂuids also change perpendicular to the ﬂow direction. This is schematically shown in Fig. 1.23. Each ﬂuid element that ﬂows in a crossﬂow heat exchanger experiences its own temperature change, from the entry temperature ϑi which is the same for all particles to its individual exit temperature. Crossﬂow is often applied in a shell-and-tube heat exchanger when one of the ﬂuids is gaseous. The gas ﬂows around the rows of tubes crosswise to the tube axis. The other ﬂuid, normally a liquid, ﬂows inside the tubes. The addition of ﬁns to the outer tube walls, cf. 1.2.3 and 2.2.3, increases the area available for heat transfer on the gas side, thereby compensating for the lower heat transfer coeﬃcient. Fig. 1.24 shows a particularly simple heat exchanger design, a coiled tube inside a vessel, for example a boiler. One ﬂuid ﬂows through the tube, the other one is

Fig. 1.23: Fluid temperatures ϑ1 = ϑ1 (x, y) and ϑ2 = ϑ2 (x, y) in crossﬂow

44

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Fig. 1.24: Coiled tube heat exchanger (schematic)

Fig. 1.25: Regenerators for the periodic heat transfer between the gases, air and nitrogen (schematic)

in the vessel and can either ﬂow through the vessel or stay there while it is being heated up or cooled down. The vessel is usually equipped with a stirrer that mixes the ﬂuid, improving the heat transfer to the coiled tube. There are also numerous other special designs for heat exchangers which will not be discussed here. It is possible to combine the three basic ﬂow regimes of countercurrent, cocurrent and crossﬂow in a number of diﬀerent ways, which leads to complex calculation procedures.

1.3 Heat exchangers

45

The heat exchangers dealt with so far have had two ﬂuids ﬂowing steadily through the apparatus at the same time. They are always separated by a wall through which heat ﬂows from the hotter to the colder ﬂuid. These types of heat exchangers are also known as recuperators, which are diﬀerent from regenerators. They contain a packing material, for example a lattice of bricks with channels for the gas or a packed bed of stone or metal strips, that will allow gases to pass through it. The gases ﬂow alternately through the regenerator. The hot gas transfers heat to the packing material, where it is stored as internal energy. Then the cold gas ﬂows through the regenerator, removes heat from the packing and leaves at a higher temperature. Continuous operation requires at least two regenerators, so that one gas can be heated whilst the other one is being cooled, Fig. 1.25. Each of the regenerators will be periodically heated and cooled by switching the gas ﬂows around. This produces a periodic change in the exit temperatures of the gases. Regenerators are used as air preheaters in blast furnaces and as heat exchangers in low temperature gas liquefaction plants. A special design, the Ljungstr¨om preheater, equipped with a rotating packing material serves as a preheater for air in ﬁring equipment and gas turbine plants.The warm gas in this case is the exhaust gas from combustion which should be cooled as much as possible for energy recovery. The regenerator theory was mainly developed by H. Hausen [1.10]. As it includes a number of complicated calculations of processes that are time dependent no further study of the theory will be made here. The summary by H. Hausen [1.7] and the VDI-HeatAtlas [1.11] are suggested for further study on this topic.

1.3.2

General design equations. Dimensionless groups

Fig. 1.26 is a scheme for a heat exchanger. The temperatures of the two ﬂuids are denoted by ϑ1 and ϑ2 , as in section 1.3.1, and it will be assumed that ϑ1 > ϑ2 . Heat will therefore be transferred from ﬂuid 1 to ﬂuid 2. Entry temperatures are indicated by one dash, exit temperatures by two dashes. The ﬁrst law of thermodynamics is applied to for both ﬂuids. The heat transferred causes an enthalpy increase in the cold ﬂuid 2 and a decrease in the warm ﬂuid 1. This gives (1.93) Q˙ = M˙ 1 (h1 − h1 ) = M˙ 2(h2 − h2 ) , where M˙ i is the mass ﬂow rate of ﬂuid i. The speciﬁc enthalpies are calculated

Fig. 1.26: Heat exchanger scheme, with the mass ﬂow rate M˙ i , entry temperatures ϑi , exit temperatures ϑi , entry enthalpy hi and exit enthalpy hi of both ﬂuids (i = 1, 2)

46

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

at the entry and exit temperatures ϑi and ϑi respectively. These temperatures are averaged over the relevant tube cross section, and can be determined using the explanation in section 1.1.3 for calculating adiabatic mixing temperatures. Equation (1.93) is only valid for heat exchangers which are adiabatic with respect to their environment, and this will always be assumed to be the case. The two ﬂuids ﬂow through the heat exchanger without undergoing a phase change, i.e. they do not boil or condense. The small change in speciﬁc enthalpy with pressure is neglected. Therefore only the temperature dependence is important, and with h − hi cpi := i , i = 1, 2 (1.94) ϑi − ϑi the mean speciﬁc heat capacity between ϑi and ϑi it follows from (1.93) that Q˙ = M˙ 1cp1 (ϑ1 − ϑ1 ) = M˙ 2cp2 (ϑ2 − ϑ2 ) . As an abbreviation the heat capacity ﬂow rate is introduced by ˙ i := M˙ i cpi W which then gives

,

i = 1, 2

˙ 1 (ϑ1 − ϑ1 ) = W ˙ 2 (ϑ2 − ϑ2 ) . Q˙ = W

(1.95)

(1.96)

The temperature changes in both ﬂuids are linked to each other due to the ﬁrst law of thermodynamics. They are related inversely to the ratio of the heat capacity ﬂow rates. The heat ﬂow Q˙ is transferred from ﬂuid 1 to ﬂuid 2 because of the temperature diﬀerence ϑ1 −ϑ2 inside the heat exchanger. This means that the heat ﬂow Q˙ has to overcome the overall resistance to heat transfer 1/kA according to section 1.2.1. The quantity kA will from now on be called the transfer capability of the heat exchanger, and is a characteristic quantity of the apparatus. It is calculated using (1.72) from the transfer resistances in the ﬂuids and the resistance to conduction in the wall between them. The value for kA is usually taken to be an apparatus constant, where the overall heat transfer coeﬃcient k is assumed to have the same value throughout the heat exchanger. However this may not always happen, the ﬂuid heat transfer coeﬃcient can change due to the temperature dependence of some of the ﬂuid properties or by a variation in the ﬂow conditions. In cases such as these, k and kA must be calculated for various points in the heat exchanger and a suitable mean value can be found, cf. W. Roetzel and B. Spang [1.12], to represent the characteristic transfer capability kA of the heat exchanger. Before beginning calculations for heat exchanger design, it is useful to get an overview of the quantities which have an eﬀect on them. Then the number of these quantities will be reduced by the introduction of dimensionless groups. Finally the relevant relationships for the design will be determined. Fig. 1.27 contains the seven quantities that inﬂuence the design of a heat exchanger. The eﬀectiveness of the heat exchanger is characterised by its transfer capability kA,

1.3 Heat exchangers

Fig. 1.27: Heat exchanger with the seven quantities which aﬀect its design

47

Fig. 1.28: The three decisive temperature diﬀerences (arrows) in a heat exchanger

˙ i , entry temperatures ϑ and the two ﬂuid ﬂows by their heat capacity ﬂow rates W i exit temperatures ϑi . As the temperature level is not important only the three temperature diﬀerences (ϑ1 − ϑ1 ), (ϑ2 − ϑ2) and (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ), as shown in Fig. 1.28, are of inﬂuence. This reduces the number of quantities that have any eﬀect by one so that six quantities remain: ˙ 1 , (ϑ2 − ϑ2 ), W ˙2 kA, (ϑ1 − ϑ1 ), W

and (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) .

These belong to only two types of quantity either temperature (unit K) or heat capacity ﬂow rate (units W/K). According to section 1.1.4, that leaves four (= 6− 2) characteristic quantities to be deﬁned. These are the dimensionless temperature changes in both ﬂuids ε1 :=

ϑ1 − ϑ1 ϑ1 − ϑ2

and ε2 :=

ϑ2 − ϑ2 , ϑ1 − ϑ2

(1.97)

see Fig. 1.29, and the ratios N1 :=

kA ˙1 W

and N2 :=

kA . ˙2 W

(1.98)

These are also known as the Number of Transfer Units or NTU for short. We suggest Ni be characterised as the dimensionless transfer capability of the heat exchanger. Instead of N2 the ratio of the two heat capacity ﬂow rates C1 :=

˙1 W N2 = ˙2 N1 W

Fig. 1.29: Plot of the dimensionless ﬂuid tempera tures ϑ+ i = (ϑi − ϑ2 ) / (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) over the area and illustration of ε1 and ε2 according to (1.97)

(1.99)

48

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

or its inverse C2 :=

˙2 W 1 = ˙ C1 W1

(1.100)

is often used. The four groups in (1.97) and (1.98), are not independent of each other, because applying the ﬁrst law of thermodynamics gives ε1 ε2 = N1 N2

or ε2 = C1 ε1 .

(1.101)

The relationship which exists between the three remaining characteristic quantities F (ε1 , N1 , N2 ) = 0 or F (ε1 , N1 , C1 ) = 0 (1.102) is the operating characteristic of the heat exchanger. It depends on the ﬂow conﬁguration and is found from the temperature pattern of both ﬂuids, that will be discussed in detail in the following sections. Heat exchanger design mainly consists of two tasks: 1. Calculating the heat ﬂow transferred in a given heat exchanger. 2. Design of a heat exchanger for a prescribed performance. ˙ 1, W ˙ 2 and kA will all be given. The temperature In the ﬁrst case (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ), W ˙ the heat ﬂow transferred, can be changes in both ﬂuids have to be found so that Q, determined from (1.96). As the characteristic numbers, N1 and N2 or N1 and C1 are given this problem can be solved immediately, if the operating characteristic in (1.102) can be explicitly resolved for ε1 : ε1 = ε1 (N1 , C1 ) . The dimensionless temperature change ε2 of the other ﬂuid follows from (1.101). In the calculations for the design of a heat exchanger kA has to be found. Either the temperature changes in both ﬂuids or the two values for the heat capacity ﬂow and the temperature change in one of the ﬂuids must be known, in order to determine kA. An operating characteristic which can be explicitly solved for N1 or N2 is desired: N1 = N1 (ε1, C1 ) . This gives for the transfer capability ˙ 1 = N2 W ˙2 . kA = N1 W In Fig. 1.30 an operating characteristic for a heat exchanger with given ﬂow conﬁguration is shown. The solutions to both tasks, heat transfer calculation and design calculation are indicated. In many cases the explicit solution of the operating characteristic for ε1 and N1 is not possible, even if an analytical expression is available. If this arises a diagram similar to Fig. 1.30 should be used. Further details are given in section 1.3.5.

1.3 Heat exchangers

49

Fig. 1.30: Schematic representation of the operating characteristic for a heat exchanger with Ci = const. N is the assumed operating point for the heat transfer calculations: εi = εi (Ni , Ci ), A is the assumed operating point for the design: Ni = Ni (εi , Ci ). The determination of the mean temperature diﬀerence Θ for point A is also shown.

˙ i was introduced in (1.95) boiling and conWhen the heat capacity ﬂow rate W densing ﬂuids were not considered. At constant pressure a pure substance which is boiling or condensing does not undergo a change in temperature, but cpi → ∞. ˙ i → ∞ resulting in Ni = 0 and Ci → ∞. This This leads to εi = 0, whilst W simpliﬁes the calculations for the heat exchanger, as the operating characteristic is now a relationship between only two rather than three quantities, namely ε and N of the other ﬂuid, which is neither boiling nor condensing. In heat exchanger calculations another quantity alongside those already introduced is often used, namely the mean temperature diﬀerence Δϑm . This is found by integrating the local temperature diﬀerence (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) between the two ﬂuids over the whole transfer area. Δϑm =

1 A

(ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) dA .

(1.103)

(A)

In analogy to (1.71) the heat ﬂow transferred is Q˙ = kAΔϑm .

(1.104)

This equation can only strictly be used if the heat transfer coeﬃcient k is the same at each point on A. If this is not true then (1.104) can be considered to be a deﬁnition for a mean value of k. The introduction of Δϑm in conjunction with (1.104), gives a relationship between the heat ﬂow transferred and the transfer capability kA, and therefore with the area A of the heat exchanger. This produces the following equations ˙ 1 (ϑ1 − ϑ1 ) = W ˙ 2 (ϑ2 − ϑ2 ) . Q˙ = kAΔϑm = W With the dimensionless mean temperature diﬀerence Θ=

Δϑm ϑ1 − ϑ2

(1.105)

the following relationship between the dimensionless groups is found: Θ=

ε2 ε1 = . N1 N2

(1.106)

50

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

The mean temperature Δϑm and its associated dimensionless quantity Θ can be calculated using the dimensionless numbers that have already been discussed. The introduction of the mean temperature diﬀerence does not provide any information that cannot be found from the operating characteristic. This is also illustrated in Fig. 1.30, where Θ is the gradient of the straight line that joins the operating point and the origin of the graph.

1.3.3

Countercurrent and cocurrent heat exchangers

The operating characteristic F (εi , Ni , Ci ) = 0, for a countercurrent heat exchanger is found by analysing the temperature distribution in both ﬂuids. The results can easily be transferred for use with the practically less important case of a cocurrent exchanger. We will consider the temperature changes, shown in Fig. 1.31, in a countercurrent heat exchanger. The temperatures ϑ1 and ϑ2 depend on the z coordinate in the direction of ﬂow of ﬂuid 1. By applying the ﬁrst law to a section of length dz ˙ from ﬂuid 1 to ﬂuid 2 through the surface element the rate of heat transfer, dQ, dA is found to be ˙ 1 dϑ1 (1.107) dQ˙ = −M˙ 1 cp1 dϑ1 = −W and ˙ 2 dϑ2 . dQ˙ = −M˙ 2 cp2 dϑ2 = −W

(1.108)

Now dQ˙ is eliminated by using the equation for overall heat transfer dz dQ˙ = k (ϑ1 − ϑ2) dA = kA (ϑ1 − ϑ2) L

(1.109)

from (1.107) and (1.108) giving dϑ1 = −(ϑ1 − ϑ2 )

Fig. 1.31: Temperature pattern in a countercurrent heat exchanger

dz kA dz = −(ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) N1 ˙ L L W1

(1.110)

1.3 Heat exchangers

51

Table 1.4: Equations for the calculation of the normalised temperature variation εi , the dimensionless transfer capability Ni and the mean temperature diﬀerence Θ in counter and cocurrent heat exchangers Flow regime

εi = εi (Ni , Ci )

Ni = Ni (εi , Ci )

Θ = Θ (ε1 , ε2 )

counter current Ci = 1 i = 1, 2

εi =

1 − exp [(Ci − 1) Ni ] 1 − Ci exp [(Ci − 1) Ni ]

C=1

ε=

cocurrent i = 1, 2

εi =

Ni =

1 1 − Ci εi ln 1 − Ci 1 − εi

N 1+N

N=

1 − exp [− (1 + Ci ) Ni ] 1 + Ci

Ni = −

˙i Ni = kA/W

,

Θ=

Δϑm εi = Ni ϑ1 − ϑ2

and dϑ2 = −(ϑ1 − ϑ2 )

ε 1−ε

ε1 =

ϑ1 − ϑ 1 ϑ1 − ϑ2

,

C1 =

Θ=

,

ε1 − ε 2 1 − ε2 ln 1 − ε1

Θ=1−ε

ln [1 − εi (1 + Ci )] 1 + Ci

Meaning of the characteristic numbers:

Θ=

ε2 =

− (ε1 + ε2 ) ln [1 − (ε1 + ε2 )]

ϑ2 − ϑ 2 ϑ1 − ϑ2

˙1 W ε2 N2 = = ˙2 ε1 N1 W

,

C2 =

kA dz dz = −(ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) N2 ˙ L L W2

1 C1

(1.111)

for the temperature changes in both ﬂuids. The temperatures ϑ1 = ϑ1 (z) and ϑ2 = ϑ2 (z) will not be calculated from the two diﬀerential equations, instead the variation in the diﬀerence between the temperature of the two ﬂuids ϑ1 − ϑ2 will be determined. By subtracting (1.111) from (1.110) and dividing by (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) it follows that dz d(ϑ1 − ϑ2) = (N2 − N1 ) . ϑ1 − ϑ2 L

(1.112)

Integrating this diﬀerential equation between z = 0 and z = L leads to ln Now, we have

ϑ − ϑ2 (ϑ1 − ϑ2)L = ln 1 = N2 − N1 . (ϑ1 − ϑ2 )0 ϑ1 − ϑ2

ϑ1 − ϑ2 − (ϑ1 − ϑ1 ) 1 − ε1 ϑ1 − ϑ2 = , = ϑ1 − ϑ2 ϑ1 − ϑ2 − (ϑ2 − ϑ2) 1 − ε2

(1.113)

52

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Fig. 1.32: Operating characteristic εi = εi (Ni , Ci ) for countercurrent ﬂow from Tab. 1.4

which gives

1 − ε1 = N2 − N1 (1.114) 1 − ε2 as the implicit form of the operating characteristic of a countercurrent heat exchanger. It is invariant with respect to an exchange of the indices 1 and 2. Using the ratios of C1 and C2 = 1/C1 from (1.99) and (1.100), explicit equations are obtained, εi = f (Ni , Ci ) and Ni = f (εi , Ci ) , i = 1, 2 ln

which have the same form for both ﬂuids. These explicit formulae for the operating characteristics are shown in Table 1.4. If the heat capacity ﬂow rates are equal, ˙1=W ˙ 2 , and because C1 = C2 = 1, it follows that W ε1 = ε2 = ε and N1 = N2 = N , and with a series development of the equations valid for Ci = 1 towards the limit of Ci → 1, the simple relationships given in Table 1.4 are obtained. Fig. 1.32 shows the operating characteristic εi = f (Ni , Ci ) as a function of Ni with Ci as a parameter. As expected the normalised temperature change εi grows monotonically with increasing Ni , and therefore increasing transfer capability kA. For Ni → ∞ the limiting value is 1 for Ci ≤ 1 lim εi = . 1/Ci for Ci > 1 Ni →∞ If Ci ≤ 1, then εi takes on the character of an eﬃciency. The normalised temperature change of the ﬂuid with the smaller heat capacity ﬂow is known as the eﬃciency or eﬀectiveness of the heat exchanger. With an enlargement of the heat transfer area A the temperature diﬀerence between the two ﬂuids can be made as small as desired, but only at one end of the countercurrent exchanger. Only for

1.3 Heat exchangers

53

˙ 2 , which means C1 = C2 = 1, can an inﬁnitely small temperature diﬀer˙1 =W W ence at at both ends, and therefore throughout the heat exchanger, be achieved by an enlargement of the surface area. The ideal case of reversible heat transfer between two ﬂuids, often considered in thermodynamics, is thus only attainable ˙1=W ˙ 2 in a heat exchanger with very high transfer capability. when W As already mentioned in section 1.3.2, the function εi = f (Ni , Ci ) is used to calculate the outlet temperature and the transfer capability of a given heat exchanger. For the sizing of a heat exchanger for a required temperature change in the ﬂuid, the other form of the operating characteristic, Ni = Ni (εi , Ci ), is used. This is also given in Table 1.4. In a cocurrent heat exchanger the direction of ﬂow is opposite to that in Fig. 1.31, cf. also Fig. 1.20b. In place of (1.108) the energy balance is ˙ 2 dϑ2 , dQ˙ = M˙ 2 cp2 dϑ2 = W which gives the relationship d(ϑ1 − ϑ2) dz = −(N1 + N2 ) ϑ1 − ϑ2 L

(1.115)

instead of (1.112). According to (1.114) the temperature diﬀerence between the two ﬂuids in the direction of ﬂow is always decreasing. Integration of (1.115) between z = 0 and z = L yields ln

ϑ1 − ϑ2 = −(N1 + N2 ) , ϑ1 − ϑ2

from which follows ln [1 − (ε1 + ε2 )] = −(N1 + N2 ) = −

ε1 + ε2 Θ

(1.116)

as the implicit form of the operating characteristic. This can be solved for εi and Ni giving the functions noted in Table 1.4. For Ni → ∞ the normalised temperature variation reaches the limiting value of lim εi =

Ni →∞

1 1 + Ci

,

i = 1, 2 .

With cocurrent ﬂow the limiting value of εi = 1 is never reached except when Ci = 0, as will soon be explained. The calculations for performance and sizing of a heat exchanger can also be carried out using a mean temperature diﬀerence Θ from (1.105) in section 1.3.2. In countercurrent ﬂow, the diﬀerence N2 − N1 in (1.113) is replaced by Θ, ε1 and ε2 giving the expression Θ = Θ(ε1 , ε2 ) which appears in Table 1.4. Introducing N2 − N1 =

ε 2 − ε1 ϑ − ϑ2 − (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) ϑ − ϑ2 − (ϑ1 − ϑ1 ) = 1 = 2 Θ Δϑm Δϑm

54

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Fig. 1.33: Temperature in a condenser with cooling of superheated steam, condensation and subcooling of the condensate (ﬂuid 1) by cooling water (ﬂuid 2) into (1.113) , gives Δϑm =

ϑ1 − ϑ2 − (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) ϑ − ϑ2 ln 1 ϑ1 − ϑ2

(1.117)

for the mean temperature diﬀerence in a countercurrent heat exchanger. It is the logarithmic mean of the temperature diﬀerence between the two ﬂuids at both ends of the apparatus. The expression, from (1.116), for the normalised mean temperature diﬀerence Θ, in cocurrent ﬂow is given in Table 1.4. Putting in (1.117) the deﬁning equations for ε1 and ε2 yields Δϑm =

ϑ1 − ϑ2 − (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) . ϑ − ϑ2 ln 1 ϑ1 − ϑ2

(1.118)

So Δϑm is also the logarithmic mean temperature diﬀerence at both ends of the heat exchanger in cocurrent ﬂow.

We will now compare the two ﬂow conﬁgurations. For Ci = 0 the normalised temperature variation in Table 1.4 is εi = 1 − exp(−Ni ) and the dimensionless transfer capability Ni = − ln(1 − εi ) both of which are independent of whether countercurrent or cocurrent ﬂow is used. Therefore when one of the substances boils or condenses in the exchanger it is immaterial which ﬂow conﬁguration is chosen. However, if in a condenser, superheated steam is ﬁrst cooled from ϑ1 to the condensation temperature of ϑ1s , then completely condensed, after which the condensate is cooled from ϑ1s to ϑ1 , more complex circumstances develop. In these cases it is not permissible to treat the equipment as simply one heat exchanger, using the equations that have already been deﬁned, where only the inlet and outlet temperatures ϑi and

1.3 Heat exchangers

55

Fig. 1.34: Ratio (kA)co / (kA)cc = Nico /Nicc of the transfer capabilities in cocurrent (index co) and countercurrent (index cc) ﬂows as a function of εi and Ci

ϑi (i = 1, 2) are important, cf. Fig. 1.33. The values for the heat capacity ﬂow ˙ 1 change signiﬁcantly: During the cooling of the steam and the condensate rate W ˙ ˙ 1 is inﬁnite. The W1 has a ﬁnite value, whereas in the process of condensation W exchanger has to be imaginarily split, and then be treated as three units in series. Energy balances provide the two unknown temperatures, ϑ2a between the cooling and condensation section, and ϑ2b, between the condensation and sub-cooling part. These in turn yield the dimensionless temperature diﬀerences εia , εib and εic for the three sections cooler a, condenser b and sub-cooler c (i = 1, 2). The dimensionless transfer capabilities Nia , Nib and Nic of the three equipment sections can then be calculated according to the relationships in Table 1.4. From Nij the values for (kA)j can be found. Then using the relevant overall heat transfer coeﬃcients kj , we obtain the areas of the three sections Aj (j = a, b, c), which together make up the total transfer area of the exchanger. For Ci > 0 the countercurrent conﬁguration is always superior to the cocurrent. A disadvantage of the cocurrent ﬂow exists in that not all heat transfer tasks can be solved in such a system. A given temperature change εi is only realisable if the argument of the logarithmic term in 1 ln [1 − εi (1 + Ci )] Nico = − 1 + Ci is positive. This is only the case for 1 εi < . (1.119) 1 + Ci Larger normalised temperature changes cannot be achieved in cocurrent heat exchangers even in those with very large values for the transfer capability kA. In countercurrent exchangers this limitation does not exist. All values for εi are basically attainable and therefore all required heat loads can be transferred as long as the area available for heat transfer is made large enough.

56

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

A further disadvantage of cocurrent ﬂow is that a higher transfer capability kA is required to fulﬁll the same task (same εi and Ci ) when compared with a countercurrent system. This is shown in Fig. 1.34 in which the ratio (kA)co /(kA)cc = Nico /Nicc based on the equations in Table 1.4 is represented. This ratio grows sharply when εi approaches the limiting value according to (1.119). Even when a cocurrent exchanger is capable of fulﬁlling the requirements of the task, the countercurrent exchanger will be chosen as its dimensions are smaller. Only in a combination of small enough values of Ci and εi the necessary increase in the area of a cocurrent exchanger is kept within narrow limits. Example 1.5: Ammonia, at a pressure of 1.40 MPa, is to be cooled in a countercurrent heat exchanger from ϑ1 = 150.0 ◦ C to the saturation temperature ϑ1s = 36.3 ◦ C, and then completely condensed. Its mass ﬂow rate is M˙ 1 = 0.200 kg/s. Speciﬁc enthalpies of h(ϑ1 ) = 1940.3 kJ/kg, hg (ϑ1s ) = 1631.9 kJ/kg, and hL (ϑ1s ) = 516.36 kJ/kg are taken from the property tables for ammonia, [1.13]. Cooling water with a temperature of ϑ2 = 12.0 ◦ C is available, and this can be heated to ϑ2 = 28.5 ◦ C. Its mean speciﬁc heat capacity is cp2 = 4.184 kJ/kgK. The required transfer capabilities for the cooling (kA)cooling and (kA)cond for the condensation of the ammonia have to be determined. ˙ and the required mass ﬂow rate M˙ 2 of water have to At ﬁrst the heat ﬂow transferred Q, be found. The heat ﬂow removed from the ammonia is kJ kg Q˙ = M˙ 1 h(ϑ1 ) − hL (ϑ1s ) = 0.200 (1940.3 − 516.36) = 284.8 kW . s kg From that the mass ﬂow rate of water is found to be M˙ 2 =

Q˙ 284.8 kW kg = = 4.125 . cp2 (ϑ2 − ϑ1 ) 4.184 (kJ/kgK) (28.5 − 12.0) K s

The temperature ϑ2a of the cooling water in the cross section between the cooling and condensation sections, cf. Fig. 1.35, is required to calculate the transfer capability.

Fig. 1.35: Temperatures of ammonia and cooling water in a countercurrent heat exchanger (schematic)

From the energy balance for the condensor section M˙ 2 cp2 (ϑa − ϑ2 ) = M˙ 1 hg (ϑ1s ) − hL (ϑ1s ) , it follows that ϑ2a = ϑ2 +

M˙ 1 g h (ϑ1s ) − hL (ϑ1s ) = 24.9 ◦ C . ˙ M2 cp2

1.3 Heat exchangers

57

The transfer capability for the ammonia cooling section, using Table 1.4, is (kA)cooling 1 1 − C1 ε1 = N1 = ln . ˙ 1 − C 1 − ε1 W1 1

(1.120)

The ratio of the heat capacity ﬂow rates is found with g ˙ 1 = M˙ 1 cp1 = M˙ 1 h(ϑ1 ) − h (ϑs ) = 0.200 kg 1940.3 − 1631.9 kJ = 0.5425 kW W ϑ1 − ϑs s 150.0 − 36.3 kgK K

˙ 2 = M˙ 2 cp2 = 17.272 kW/K giving C1 = 0.0314. The dimensionless temperature and with W variation of ammonia is ε1 =

ϑ1 − ϑ1s 150.0 − 36.3 = = 0.9089. ϑ1 − ϑ2a 150.0 − 24.9

Then (1.120) yields N1 = 2.444 and ﬁnally ˙ 1 = 1.326 kW/K . (kA)cooling = N1 W ˙ 1 → ∞ this For the condensation section of the heat exchanger ε1 = 0, and because W ˙ 2 /W ˙ 1 = 0. From Table 1.4 it follows that means C2 = W ˙ 2 = N2 = − ln (1 − ε2 ) . (kA)cond /W With the normalised temperature change of the cooling water ε2 =

ϑ2a − ϑ2 24.9 − 12.0 = 0.5309 , = ϑ1s − ϑ2 36.3 − 12.0

yielding N2 = 0.7569, which then gives ˙ 2 = 13.06 kW/K . (kA)cond = N2 W In order to ﬁnd the required area A = Acooling + Acond for the countercurrent exchanger, from the values for (kA)cooling and (kA)cond , the overall heat transfer coeﬃcients for each part must be calculated. They will be diﬀerent as the resistance to heat transfer in the cooling section is greatest on the gaseous ammonia side, whereas in the condensation section the greatest resistance to heat transfer is experienced on the cooling water side. The calculations for the overall heat transfer coeﬃcients will not be done here as the design of the heat exchanger and the ﬂow conditions have to be known for this purpose.

1.3.4

Crossﬂow heat exchangers

Before discussing pure crossﬂow as shown in Fig. 1.23, the operating characteristic for the simple case of crossﬂow where only the ﬂuid on one side is laterally mixed will be calculated. In this ﬂow conﬁguration the temperature of one of the two ﬂuids is only dependent on one position coordinate, e.g. x, while the temperature of the other ﬂuid changes with both x and y. In Fig. 1.36 the laterally mixed ﬂuid is indicated by the index 1. Its temperature ϑ1 changes only in the direction of ﬂow, ϑ1 = ϑ1 (x). Ideal lateral mixing is assumed so that ϑ1 does not vary with y. This assumption is closely met when ﬂuid 1 ﬂows through a single row of tubes

58

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Fig. 1.37: Crossﬂow with one tube row as a realisation of the one side laterally mixed crossﬂow

Fig. 1.36: Temperature variations in a one side laterally mixed crossﬂow. ϑ1 = ϑ1 (x) temperature of the laterally mixed ﬂuid, ϑ2 = ϑ2 (x, y) temperature of the other ﬂuid

and ﬂuid 2 ﬂows perpendicular to them, Fig. 1.37. This crossﬂow with a single row of tubes corresponds to one side laterally mixed crossﬂow. The mixed ﬂuid 1 in the tubes does not have to be the ﬂuid with the higher temperature, as was assumed before. To determine the temperatures ϑ1 = ϑ1 (x) and ϑ2 = ϑ2 (x, y) of both ﬂuids, the surface element, dA = dx dy picked out in Fig. 1.36 will be considered. The heat ﬂow transferred from ﬂuid 1 to ﬂuid 2 is given as dQ˙ = [ϑ1 (x) − ϑ2 (x, y)] k dx dy . The total heat transfer area is A = L1 L2 , see Fig. 1.36. With the dimensionless coordinates x+ := x/L1 it follows that

and

y + := y/L2

dQ˙ = ϑ1 (x+ ) − ϑ2 (x+ , y + ) kA dx+ dy + .

(1.121) (1.122)

A second relationship for dQ˙ is yielded from the application of the ﬁrst law on ﬂuid 2, which ﬂows over the surface element dA. Its mass ﬂow rate is dM˙ 2 = M˙ 2 dx/L1 = M˙ 2 dx+ , which gives

∂ϑ2 ∂ϑ2 + dy + . . . dx+ dQ˙ = M˙ 2 dx+ cp2 ϑ2 + + dy + + . . . − ϑ2 = M˙ 2 cp2 ∂y ∂y +

or

The diﬀerential equation

˙ 2 ∂ϑ2 dx+ dy + . dQ˙ = W ∂y +

(1.123)

∂ϑ2 = N2 (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) ∂y +

(1.124)

1.3 Heat exchangers

59

Fig. 1.38: Temperature changes in a strip of size L2 dx, in one side laterally mixed crossﬂow. ϑm2 (x) is the y direction average temperature of ﬂuid 2. is found from the relationships (1.122) and (1.123). The solution + ϑ2 (x+ , y + ) = ϑ1 (x+ ) − ϑ1 (x+ ) − ϑ2 e−N2 y

(1.125)

still contains the unknown temperature ϑ1 (x+ ) of the laterally mixed ﬂuid. In order to ﬁnd ϑ1 (x+ ) the ﬁrst law has to be applied to ﬂuid 1. As it ﬂows through the ˙ cf. strip with width dx it gives up a heat ﬂow dQ˙ ∗ , to ﬂuid 2, which does not agree with dQ, Fig. 1.38. For dQ˙ ∗ the following is valid dϑ1 dx + . . . − ϑ1 . − dQ˙ ∗ = M˙ 1 cp1 ϑ1 + dx With x+ from (1.121) it follows that ˙1 − dQ˙ ∗ = W

dϑ1 dx+ . dx+

A second relationship for dQ˙ ∗ is the equation for the overall heat transfer: dQ˙ ∗ = ϑ1 x+ − ϑm2 x+ kL2 dx = ϑ1 x+ − ϑm2 x+ kA dx+ . In which

(1.126)

(1.127)

1 ϑm2 (x+ ) =

ϑ2 (x+ , y +) dy +

(1.128)

y + =0

is the temperature of ﬂuid 2 averaged in the y direction, which is decisive for the overall heat transfer through the strip area L2 dx. From (1.127) and (1.128) follows the ordinary diﬀerential equation dϑ1 = −N1 (ϑ1 − ϑm2 ) (1.129) dx+ for the determination of ϑ1 (x+ ).

60

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Using (1.125) and (1.128) the average temperature of ﬂuid 2 can be calculated, giving ϑm2 (x+ ) = ϑ1 (x+ ) −

1 ϑ1 (x+ ) − ϑ2 1 − e−N2 . N2

(1.130)

Which then yields from (1.129) the diﬀerential equation N1 dϑ1 =− 1 − e−N2 (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) . dx+ N2 Integration between x+ = 0 and x+ = 1 delivers ϑ1 − ϑ2 N1 1 −N2 −C1 N1 = exp − 1 − e 1 − e = exp − . ϑ1 − ϑ2 N2 C1 The temperature ratio on the left hand side agrees with (1 − ε1 ).

The operating characteristic for one side laterally mixed crossﬂow is 1 −C1 N1 ε1 = 1 − exp − (1 − e ) . (1.131) C1 It gives the temperature change in the ﬂuid which is laterally mixed as a function of C1 from (1.99) and the dimensionless transfer capability N1 from (1.98). The operating characteristic (1.131) can be explicitly resolved for N1 . This gives N1 = −

1 ln [1 + C1 ln(1 − ε1 )] , C1

(1.132)

out of which the required value for kA can be immediately calculated. The temperature variation in the ﬂuid which ﬂows perpendicular to the tube row is found using (1.101) to be ϑ − ϑ2 ε2 = m2 = C1 ε1 . (1.133) ϑ1 − ϑ2 Here ϑm2 is the mean outlet temperature, which could also be found by integrating (1.130) over x+ . Crossﬂow with a single row of tubes was dealt with by D. M. Smith [1.14] in 1934. The extension of this work to n rows of tubes was ﬁrst carried out by H. Schedwill [1.15] in 1968. This produced signiﬁcantly more complex equations than those used in the case n = 1 handled here. The temperature change ε1 , with an outlet temperature averaged over all n rows of tubes, increases with the number of tube rows. The relevant equations can be found in [1.8] and [1.16]. An increase in the number n of tube rows in series approaches the case of pure crossﬂow, in which the temperatures of both ﬂuids change in x and y or rather the dimensionless coordinates x+ and y + , from (1.121), cf. Fig. 1.23. The heat transferred, through a surface element of dimensions dA = dx dy = A dx+ dy + , from ﬂuid 1 to ﬂuid 2, is found by the same reasoning which led to (1.123), giving the following equations: ˙1 dQ˙ = −W

∂ϑ1 dx+ dy + ∂x+

1.3 Heat exchangers

61

(1st law applied to ﬂuid 1), ˙ 2 ∂ϑ2 dx+ dy + dQ˙ = W ∂y+ (1st law applied to ﬂuid 2), and overall heat transfer dQ˙ = kA (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) dx+ dy + . Elimination of dQ˙ yields the two coupled diﬀerential equations ∂ϑ1 = −N1 (ϑ1 − ϑ2) ∂x+

(1.134a)

and

∂ϑ2 = N2 (ϑ1 − ϑ2) (1.134b) ∂y + for the temperatures ϑ1 = ϑ1 (x+ , y + ) and ϑ2 = ϑ2 (x+ , y + ). These have to fulﬁll the boundary conditions ϑ1(0, y + ) = ϑ1

and ϑ2 (x+ , 0) = ϑ2 .

(1.135)

W. Nusselt [1.17] used a power series to solve this problem. With ˙ 1 )(x/L1 ) ξ := N1 x+ = (kA/W

(1.136a)

˙ 2 )(y/L2 ) η := N2 y + = (kA/W

(1.136b)

and the solution has the form

ϑ1 (ξ, η) =

∞ m ηm ξ j m! j=0 j! m=0

ϑ2 (ξ, η) = 1 −

∞ m ξm ηj m! j=0 j! m=0

With the mean values ϑm1

1 = N2

e−(ξ+η) ,

(1.137a)

e−(ξ+η) .

(1.137b)

N2 ϑ1 (N1 , η) dη η=0

and ϑm2

1 = N1

N1 ϑ2(ξ, N2 ) dξ ξ=0

the dimensionless temperature changes of both ﬂuids are given by

m m ∞ j j N (C N ) 1 i i i 1 − e−Ni εi = 1 − e−Ci Ni , Ci Ni m=0 j! j! j=0 j=0

(1.138)

62

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Fig. 1.39: Comparison of diﬀerent ﬂow conﬁgurations in a ε1 , Θdiagram. a countercurrent, b pure crossﬂow, c one side laterally mixed crossﬂow, d cocurrent

where due to the symmetry of the problem for i = 1 and i = 2, the same relationship is valid. It is not possible to solve this equation explicitly for Ni . H. Martin [1.8] gives a surprisingly short computer program which calculates the mean temperature diﬀerence Θ = εi /Ni and therefore εi . For Ni → ∞, pure crossﬂow delivers the limits 1 for Ci ≤ 1 lim εi = (1.139) for Ci > 1 , 1/C Ni →∞ i which are the same as those for countercurrent ﬂow. The limit for Ci = 0 is εi = 1 − e−Ni

,

(Ci = 0)

(1.140)

which also agrees with the result derived in section 1.3.3. This means that when one of the ﬂuids is boiling or condensing the temperature change of the other one is not dependent on the ﬂow conﬁguration (cocurrent, countercurrent or crossﬂow). For Ci = 0 and ﬁnite values of Ni the temperature changes attainable with crossﬂow are still signiﬁcantly below those in countercurrent exchangers but are better than those in cocurrent ﬂow. The comparison of the three cases of simple ﬂow conﬁgurations is shown in Fig. 1.39. This diagram shows the dimensionless temperature change ε1 against the dimensionless mean temperature diﬀerence Θ = ε1 /N1 for the constant ratio C1 = 0.5. Lines of N1 = const appear as straight lines all of which go through the origin. A prescribed temperature diﬀerence ε1 , for example ε1 = 0.65, requires the following values for the dimensionless transfer capability: countercurrent (curve a) N1 = 1.30, crossﬂow (curve b) N1 = 1.50, cocurrent (curve d) N1 = 2.44. For a heat exchanger with N1 = 3.0 the dimensionless temperature change ε1 reached in countercurrent ﬂow has the highest value of 0.874, with crossﬂow it is 0.816 and it goes down to 0.660 in cocurrent heat exchangers.

1.3 Heat exchangers

63

Example 1.6: The cooler in a motor vehicle is a crossﬂow heat exchanger, with the cooling medium ﬂowing through a row of parallel ﬁnned tubes. Air ﬂows perpendicular to the tubes. At a certain state the volumetric ﬂow rate of the cooling medium is V˙ 1 = 1.25 dm3 /s; its density is ρ1 = 1.015 kg/dm3 and the mean speciﬁc heat capacity is cp1 = 3.80 kJ/kgK. The air enters the cooler at ϑ2 = 20.0 ◦ C with V˙ 2 = 1.100 m3 /s, ρ2 = 1.188 kg/m3 and cp2 = 1.007 kJ/kgK. The transfer capability of the cooler is kA = 0.550 kW/K. A heat ﬂow of Q˙ = 28.5 kW has to be transferred to the air. Determine the temperatures ϑ1 and ϑ1 of the motor cooling medium, and what is the temperature ϑ2 of the air leaving the cooler? From the energy balance equation (1.96), namely from ˙ 2 (ϑ − ϑ ) ˙ 1 (ϑ − ϑ ) = W Q˙ = W 1 1 2 2 the exit temperature of the air

˙ W ˙2 ϑ2 = ϑ2 + Q/

(1.141)

and the temperature change in the cooling medium ˙ W ˙1 ϑ1 − ϑ1 = Q/ can be obtained. Then from the deﬁning equation (1.97) for the normalised temperature change ε1 the entry temperature of the cooling medium is found to be ϑ1 = ϑ2 +

ϑ1 − ϑ1 Q˙ = ϑ2 + , ˙ ε1 W1 ε1

(1.142)

from which follows the cooling medium outlet temperature ˙ W ˙1 . ϑ1 = ϑ1 − Q/

(1.143)

The operating characteristic for this case of crossﬂow with a single row of tubes (one side laterally mixed crossﬂow) according to (1.131), gives the value of ε1 required in (1.142): 1 1 − e−C1 N1 . (1.144) ε1 = 1 − exp − C1 To evaluate the equations, the heat capacity ﬂow rates are calculated using the given data for the cooling medium, 3 ˙ 1 = V˙ 1 ρ1 cp1 = 1.25 dm · 1.015 kg · 3.80 kJ = 4.821 kW , W s dm3 kgK K

and the air, 3 ˙ 2 = V˙ 2 ρ2 cp2 = 1.100 m · 1.188 kg · 1.007 kJ = 1.316 kW . W s m3 kgK K

From which the dimensionless numbers ˙ 1 /W ˙ 2 = 3.664 C1 = W and ˙ 2 = 0.418 C1 N1 = N2 = kA/W are found. From the operating characteristic according to (1.144) ε1 = 0.0890 follows. This then yields the values for the temperatures of the cooling medium from (1.142) and (1.143) to be ϑ1 = 86.4 ◦ C and ϑ1 = 80.5 ◦ C . A relatively high temperature level of the cooling medium favourable for the working of the motor, is achieved. The exit temperature of the air, from (1.141) is ϑ2 = 41.7 ◦ C.

64

1.3.5

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Operating characteristics of further ﬂow conﬁgurations. Diagrams

In addition to the cases of countercurrent, cocurrent and crossﬂow, further ﬂow conﬁgurations are possible. These are also applied in industry and have been investigated by many diﬀerent authors, cf. the compilation of W. Roetzel and B. Spang [1.16]. The operating characteristics F (εi, Ni , Ci ) = 0 are often complex mathematical expressions, so it seems reasonable to represent the results graphically. W. Roetzel and B. Spang [1.18] discussed the possibility of representing the operating characteristics in a graph, and came up with a clearly arranged diagram which can be found in the VDI-HeatAtlas [1.16]. This square shaped graph consists of two parts which are separated by the diagonal running from the bottom left to the top right hand corner, Fig. 1.40. The axes of the graph are the two dimensionless temperature changes ε1 and ε2 from (1.97). The area above the diagonal ˙ 1 = const contains lines of constant dimensionless transfer capability N1 = kA/W as well as a host of straight lines that run through the origin, according to C1 =

˙1 W ε2 N2 = = = const . ˙ ε N W2 1 1

(1.145)

These lines are not drawn on the graph, to prevent it from looking too crowded, only the end points are marked around the edges of the ﬁgure. Each point in the triangle above the diagonal corresponds to an operating state, for which the values for ε1 , N1 and C1 can be read oﬀ the graph. The accompanying value for ε2 can be found from the point on the abscissa. In the triangle below the diagonal, the operating characteristic is represented in the form of F (ε2 , N2 , C2 ) = 0. The lines of equal transfer capability N1 = N2 meet at the diagonal C1 = C2 = 1 with a kink. This is due to (1.145). Only the line N1 = N2 → ∞ does not have a kink at this point. In symmetrical ﬂow

Fig. 1.40: Scheme for a ε1 , ε2 -diagram according to W. Roetzel and B. Spang [1.16] with lines of N1 = const and N2 = const

1.4 The diﬀerent types of mass transfer

65

conﬁgurations, e.g. counter or crosscurrent ﬂow, the operating characteristics for i = 1 and i = 2 agree, so the two halves of the graph are symmetric about the diagonal. However in asymmetric ﬂow, for example in one side laterally mixed crossﬂow, this is not the case. The indices for each ﬂuid must be carefully checked so that the results from the graph are not mixed up. A comprehensive collection of these graphs for the design and construction of heat exchangers is available in the VDI-HeatAtlas [1.16].

1.4

The diﬀerent types of mass transfer

Mass transfer is the transport of one or more components of a mixture, of ﬂuid or solid material, within a phase12 or over the phase boundary. Mass transport within a phase up to the phase boundary is called mass transfer. When this occurs over the phase boundary into another phase, it is then known as overall mass transfer. These terms correspond to those in heat transfer. The driving forces for mass transfer are concentration, temperature or pressure gradients. We will explore the most common of these three, namely mass transfer due to a concentration gradient. As experience tells us, the components of a mixture move from regions of higher concentration to those with lower concentration. Equilibrium with respect to mass transfer is realised when the driving force, in this case the concentration diﬀerence, has disappeared. Mass transfer processes can be found in various ways in both nature and technology. Highly developed plants and animals have circulatory systems which serve the supply of nutrition and energy, where processes of mass transfer are decisive. In plants the water taken up from the soil carries the products of photosynthesis, above all glucose, to the places where they are used or stored. Red blood corpuscles release carbon dioxide in the lungs, and take up oxygen which is needed by all cells in the body. Separation processes in chemical engineering such as the drying of solid materials, distillation, extraction and sorption are all aﬀected by the processes of mass transfer. They also play a role in the production of materials in order to obtain the desired properties of a substance. Chemical reactions, including combustion processes, are often decisively determined by mass transfer. As a simple example of mass transfer we will consider a glass ﬁlled with water in a room of dry air. Immediately above the liquid surface there is a large amount of water vapour, whilst further away there is far less. As a result of this concentration drop the air enriches itself with water vapour. This ﬂows in the direction of the concentration or partial pressure drop. In a volume element above the surface of the water, the velocity of the water molecules perpendicular to the liquid surface 12

The phase is understood here to be the area of the system, in which each volume element has values for the thermodynamic variables of pressure, temperature and concentration, among others. Only steady, rather than irregular changes in these quantities are permitted within a phase. In thermodynamics a phase is a homogeneous region in a system. In a phase in the sense of thermodynamics all the deﬁned intensive variables of state are spatially constant.

66

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

is greater than that of the air molecules. This leads to a perceptible, macroscopic relative movement between water vapour and air. This sort of macroscopic relative movement of a single substance in a phase is known as diﬀusion. There are two diﬀerent forms of diﬀusion. In quiescent ﬂuids or solid bodies which are made up of diﬀerent components, one substance can only be transferred if the average molecular velocities of some components in the mixture are diﬀerent from each other. This is known as molecular diﬀusion. It also occurs in laminar ﬂow, as the volume elements of the ﬂuid move along deﬁned ﬂow paths and mass transfer between volume elements can only happen if the average molecular velocities of the components are diﬀerent. In contrast, a turbulent ﬂow is indicated by the irregular, random movements of the ﬂuid elements, which can be diﬀerent for each component. This overlaps the whole ﬂow and therefore also the mass transport through molecular diﬀusion. The irregular ﬂuid motion is often an order of magnitude greater than the molecular diﬀusion. Mass transfer due to irregular ﬂuctuations in the ﬂuid is known as turbulent diﬀusion. This can also be applied to the situation of the water in the glass, by inducing a signiﬁcantly high ﬂow velocity above the surface of the water by blowing or mixing. The amount of water vapour transferred to the air in a certain period of time will be far greater than that transferred in the same time interval in quiescent air. In order to understand mass transfer due to molecular diﬀusion we will study the process in a vessel ﬁlled with a coloured solution, for example iodine solution. Water is carefully poured over the iodine solution, to avoid as far as possible convection currents. The coloured solution and the water are noticeably separate at the beginning of the experiment. After some time the upper layer becomes coloured, while the layer beneath it is clear enough to see through. Eventually, after long enough time has passed, the solution is the same colour throughout. So quite obviously despite there being no convection currents iodine molecules were transported from the lower to the upper part of the vessel. This can be explained by the diﬀusion of iodine molecules in water. During the process the single iodine molecules penetrate partly into areas of higher and partly into areas of lower concentration, with out any preferred direction. Despite this transport of iodine molecules from regions of high to regions of low concentration take place. To help with understanding this concept, one should think of two thin, equally sized volume elements cut out from both sides of a horizontal cross section. Although the movements of a single iodine molecule in one of these volume elements cannot be predicted, we can say that after a certain time, on average a ﬁnite number of molecules from the lower element will pass through the cross section and penetrate the upper element. In the same manner a certain number of molecules will move in the opposite direction, from the upper to the lower element. As there were more iodine molecules in the element below the cross section, more molecules were going to move into the upper layer due to the random molecular motion. A balancing out of the concentration takes place, until enough time has passed and the concentration diﬀerences within the solution have been dismantled.

1.4 The diﬀerent types of mass transfer

67

From a macroscopic standpoint molecular diﬀusion is mass transfer due to a concentration diﬀerence. Other types of diﬀusion, namely diﬀusion due to pressure diﬀerences (pressure diﬀusion) or temperature diﬀerences (thermal diﬀusion) will not be discussed here. The mechanism of molecular diﬀusion corresponds to that of heat conduction, whilst mass transfer in a ﬂowing ﬂuid, known for short as convective mass transfer corresponds to convective mass transfer. Mass transfer by diﬀusion and convection are the only sorts of mass transfer. Radiative heat transfer has no corresponding mass transfer process.

1.4.1

Diﬀusion

The calculation of mass transfer by diﬀusion requires several deﬁnitions and relationships which will be outlined in the following. 1.4.1.1

Composition of mixtures

The composition of mixtures can be characterised in diﬀerent ways. For a quantitative description the following quantities have to be introduced. The mass fraction ξA is the mass MA of component A over the total mass M in a volume element within a phase13 : MA MA . = M MK

ξA :=

(1.146)

K

The sum of all the mass fractions is

ξK = 1 .

(1.146a)

K

The mole fraction x˜A is the number of moles NA of component A over the total number of moles N in the mixture in a given phase: x˜A :=

NA NA . = N NK

(1.147)

K

The sum of all the mole fractions is

x˜K = 1 .

(1.147a)

K

The molar concentration of substance A is deﬁned by cA := NA /V . 13

K.

(1.148)

The letter K under the summation sign means that the sum is taken over all the components

68

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

The molar concentration of the mixture is c := N/V =

cK ,

K

which gives for the mole fraction of component A x˜A = cA /c . For ideal gases cA = pA /Rm T and c = p/Rm T , is valid, where pA = x˜A p is the partial pressure of component A and Rm = 8.31451 J/(mol K) is the molar gas constant. These quantities in a composition are not independent from each other. To ﬁnd a relationship between the mass and mole fractions, we multiply (1.147) by ˜ A = MA /NA of component A. This gives the molar mass M ˜ A = MA /N . x˜A M ˜ = M/N : Summation over all the components yields the average molar mass M

˜K = x˜K M

K

˜ . MK /N = M/N = M

(1.149)

K

This then gives the following relationship between the mole and mass fractions ξA =

˜A MA MA NA N M = = x˜ . ˜ A M NA N M M

(1.150)

In the reverse case, when the mass fractions are known, the mole fractions come from ˜ M x˜A = ξ , (1.151) ˜A A M in which the average molar mass is found from the mass fractions and the molar masses of the components as NK MK NK 1 N = = = ˜ M M M MK M K K or

1 1 = ξK . ˜ ˜K M M

(1.152)

K

1.4.1.2

Diﬀusive ﬂuxes

In each volume element the average particle velocities of each substance can be diﬀerent, so that the convection of the volume elements overlaps the relative movement of the particles of diﬀerent substances. This macroscopic relative movement

1.4 The diﬀerent types of mass transfer

69

is known as diﬀusion. The average velocity of the particles of substance A is denoted by the vector wA . To describe diﬀusion we will introduce the relative velocity wA − ω, where ω is a reference velocity which is yet to be deﬁned. As the diﬀusional ﬂux (SI unit mol/m2 s) of substance A, the quantity j A := cA (w A − ω)

(1.153)

is deﬁned. The reference velocity ω can be chosen to be the velocity w at the centre of gravity of the mass. This is deﬁned as the average mass velocity of a volume element: w := K w K or w = ξK wK . (1.154) K

K

The diﬀusional ﬂux is then j A = cA (w A − w) . ˜ A yields with cA M ˜ A = A Multiplication with the molar mass M ˜ A = j ∗A = A (w A − w) , j AM

(1.155)

where j ∗A is the mass based diﬀusional ﬂux of component A (SI unit kg/m2 s). From (1.154) and (1.155) it follows that

j ∗K = 0 .

(1.156)

K

The reference system using the average mass velocity w from (1.154) is called the centre of gravity system. The momentum and energy balances for this system are easily formulated. The average molar velocity u can also be used as a further reference velocity. It is deﬁned by u := x˜K w K . (1.157) K

The associated diﬀusional ﬂux (SI units mol/m2 s) is uj A

:= cA (w A − u) . (1.158) Taking into account cA = x˜A c and cK = c it follows from (1.157) and (1.158) that

K

ujK

=0 .

K

A reference system with the average molar velocity is called the particle reference system. Other reference systems and velocities are available in the literature [1.21]. The diﬀusional ﬂux in one system can be transferred to any other system, as is shown in the example which follows.

70

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Example 1.7: The diﬀusional ﬂux of component A in a ’-reference system j A = cA (wA − ζK wK , where for the “weighting factors” ζK , ω ) is given for a reference velocity ω = K ζK = 1 is valid. K

The diﬀusional ﬂux of component A j A = cA (wA − ω ) in -reference system with a reference velocity ω = ζK wK with ζK = 1 K

K

has to be calculated. The general relationship between the diﬀusional ﬂuxes j A and u j A has to be derived. It is j A −j A = cA (ω −ω ) = cA (ζK −ζK ) w K . It follows further from j A = cA (wA −ω ) K

that the velocity is w A = j A /cA + ω . Therefore

jK j A − j A = cA (ζK − ζK ) + ω cK K j K j K ζK + cA ω ζK − cA ζK − cA ω ζK , = cA c c K K K K K K from which, accounting for ζK = 1 and ζK = 1 and because ζK j K /cK = 0 the relationship

K

K

j A − j A =

K

j K −cA ζK cK K

is yielded. To change from the particle to the gravitational system we put in j A = j A , ζA = ξA and j A = u j A which give uj j A − u j A = −cA ξK K . cK K

Correspondingly the conversion of the diﬀusional ﬂux from the gravitational to the particle system gives j x ˜K K . u j A − j A = −cA cK K In a mixture of two substances, components A and B, these relationships are

ξA ξB . j A − u j A = −cA ujA + uj B cA cB ˜A − M ˜ B ) it follows that With u j A = −u j B and ξA /cA − ξB /cB = (V /M )(M j A − u j A = −cA

V ˜ ˜ u j (MA − MB ) M A

˜ and therefore with cA V /M = x ˜A /M ˜ ˜A M ˜A + x ˜B x ˜A ˜ ˜A M ˜ B) = u jA M − x (MA − M . jA = ujA 1 − ˜ ˜ M M ˜A + x ˜ B the equation given above simpliﬁes to ˜ =x Then because M ˜A M ˜B M jA = ujA

˜B M . ˜ M

And correspondingly for component B jB = ujB

˜A M . ˜ M

1.4 The diﬀerent types of mass transfer

1.4.1.3

71

Fick’s law

The diﬀusional ﬂux of component A is proportional to the concentration gradient grad cA . For the time being we will limit ourselves to a mixture of two components A and B. We will also assume that diﬀusion only takes place along one coordinate axis, for example the y-axis. The diﬀusional ﬂux can be described by an empirical statement corresponding to Fourier’s law u jA

= −DAB

dcA , dy

(1.159)

which was ﬁrst formulated by A. Fick14 and is called Fick’s ﬁrst law after him. The proportionality factor DAB (SI units m2 /s) is the diﬀusion coeﬃcient in a mixture of two components A and B. Eq. (1.159) is valid when it is assumed that the molar concentration c of the mixture is constant. This condition is fulﬁlled in constant pressure, isothermal mixtures of ideal gases due to c = N/V = p/Rm T . Disregarding this assumption of c = const, the general equation for mixtures of two substances is d˜ xA , (1.160) u jA = −cDAB dy as proved by de Groot [1.22]. In the gravitational system, the equivalent relationship to Eq. (1.160), for the diﬀusional ﬂux in the y direction is jA∗ = − DAB

dξA . dy

(1.161)

In a multicomponent mixture consisting of N components the diﬀusional ﬂux j ∗A of component A is given by [1.23] j ∗A =

N ˜ AM ˜K M DAK grad x˜K . ˜ M2 K=1

(1.162)

K=A

From this equation (1.161) is obtained for the special case of N = 2. Example 1.8: It has to be shown that (1.161) is equivalent to (1.160). ∗ The diﬀusional ﬂuxes u jA and jA in the y-direction are linked by ∗ ˜ A = ujA jA = jA M

˜B M ˜A M ˜ M

(see the solution to example 1.6). And with that ∗ = −c DAB jA

˜A ˜B M ∂x ˜A M . ˜ ∂y M

14 Adolph Fick (1829–1901), Professor of Physiology in Z¨ urich and W¨ urzburg, discovered the fundamental laws of diﬀusion.

72

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

˜ , and by diﬀerentiation of x˜A = M ˜A + ˜ ξA /M ˜ A with M ˜ =x Where c = N/V = /M ˜A M ˜ B it follows that (1 − x ˜A ) M ˜2 M dξ . d˜ xA = ˜ AM ˜B A M Then from the equation given above ∗ jA = − DAB

∂ξA ∂y

is obtained.

By exchanging the indices A and B in (1.161) the diﬀusional ﬂux for component B in the binary mixture can be found. As the sum of the two diﬀusional ﬂuxes disappears, according to (1.156), it follows that jA∗ + jB∗ = − DAB

dξA dξB − DBA =0 . dy dy

Here dξA /dy = −dξB /dy, because ξA + ξB = 1, and therefore DAB = DBA . The coeﬃcient of diﬀusion of component A through component B is the same as the diﬀusion coeﬃcient of component B through component A. Therefore the indices will no longer be used, and we will simply write D instead of DAB = DBA . Typical values for the diﬀusion coeﬃcient are 5 · 10−6 to 10−5 m2 /s in gases, −10 10 to 10−9 m2 /s in liquids and 10−14 to 10−10 m2 /s in solid bodies. In gases the molecules can move about more easily and therefore the diﬀusion coeﬃcients are greater than those for liquids, which in turn are larger than those in solid bodies. Diﬀusion in solids is several magnitudes slower than in liquids, whilst in gases it is fastest. The diﬀusional ﬂux can be calculated with the help of Fick’s law provided the concentrations are known. If however the ﬂux is known the concentration ﬁeld can be found by integration of Fick’s law. As a simple example we will take a solid material, from which component A should be removed using a liquid solvent B, Fig. 1.41.

Fig. 1.41: Diﬀusion through a quiescent liquid ﬁlm

The concentration of component A at the surface between the solid and the liquid ﬁlm is given by cA0, whilst the concentration of A in the bulk ﬂow is represented by cAδ . We will presume c = N/V = const . As the material only moves in the y-direction, there is no need to note the mass transfer direction

1.4 The diﬀerent types of mass transfer

73

in terms of vectors. The molar ﬂux from the solid into the liquid, according to (1.158), is n˙ A = cA wA = u jA + cA u with u jA = −D dcA /dy and u = xA wA + xB wB . The velocity wB of the solvent in the y-direction is zero. With a small reference velocity u, and if the concentration cA of substance A in the solvent is very low, the term cA u is negligible and so n˙ A = u jA = −D

dcA . dy

(1.163)

At steady state, the same amount of A which ﬂows into the liquid ﬁlm also ﬂows out of the ﬁlm, which means n˙ A = const. Under the assumption that the diﬀusion coeﬃcient D is constant, by integrating the equation given above, it follows that cA0 − cAδ n˙ A = −D . δ In a solid sphere of radius r0 , which is surrounded by a liquid ﬁlm of thickness δ, the diﬀusional ﬂux in the radial direction, according to (1.163), is dcA . (1.164) dr At steady state the molar ﬂow which diﬀuses through the spherical shell is constant, dcA (1.165) N˙ A = n˙ A 4πr2 = −D 4πr2 , dr and with that

dcA 2 d dN˙ A −D =0= r . dr dr dr Assuming D = const and taking into account the boundary conditions cA (r = r0 ) = cA0 and cA (r = r0 + δ) = cAδ the concentration proﬁle n˙ A = u jA = −D

1/r − 1/r0 cA − cA0 = cAδ − cA0 1/(r0 + δ) − 1/r0

(1.166)

can be found by integration. It corresponds to the temperature proﬁle for steady conduction in a hollow sphere according to (1.17). The diﬀusional ﬂow, eq. (1.165), found by diﬀerentiation is N˙ A = D

1.4.2

cA0 − cAδ 4π . 1/r0 − 1/(r0 + δ)

(1.167)

Diﬀusion through a semipermeable plane. Equimolar diﬀusion

In the previous example of the diﬀusion of component A from a solid substance into a solvent we presumed a low convection velocity u and a low concentration

74

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

cA of A in the solvent. As a result a negligible convection ﬂow cA u was found. This supposition is not normally fulﬁlled. As a typical example we will consider a liquid A in a cylindrical vessel which is evaporating in a quiescent gas B, Fig. 1.42. The liquid level is kept at y = y1 , or it changes so slowly that we can take it to be quiescent. At the surface of the liquid cA (y = y1 ) = cA1 . At moderate total pressure, cA1 can be found from the thermal equation of state for ideal gases, as cA1 = pA1/Rm T , where pA1 is the saturation partial pressure of A at temperature T of the liquid. The solubility of gas B in liquid A is negligible. This is a good approximation for water as the liquid A and air as gas B. A gaseous mixture of A and B ﬂows over the top of the cylinder y = y2 , with a concentration cA (y = y2 ) = cA2. The molar ﬂux of component A in the direction of the y-axis is, as before n˙ A = cA wA = u jA + cA u with u = x˜A wA + x˜B wB . As gas B is stagnant in the cylinder, wB = 0, and therefore u = x˜A wA . This is called diﬀusion through a semipermeable plane. The plane in this case is the surface of the water which evaporates into the adjoining air. Only water passes through, the surface is, therefore, semipermeable. The last equation gives the relationship 1 n˙ A = cA wA = (1.168) u jA , 1 − x˜A which replaces eq. (1.163) for small mole fractions x˜A of the dissolved substance. In steady conditions dn˙ A /dy = 0, and with Fick’s law (1.160), it follows that

xA d cD d˜ =0 . (1.169) dy 1 − x˜A dy Here D = DAB is the binary diﬀusion coeﬃcient. For mixtures of ideal gases at constant pressure and temperature c = N/V = p/Rm T is constant. The diﬀusion coeﬃcient only changes slightly with the composition of the mixture and can therefore be presumed to be constant. This gives the following diﬀerential equation for the concentration proﬁle

d xA 1 d˜ =0 , dy 1 − x˜A dy

Fig. 1.42: Diﬀusion of component A in a gas mixture of components A and B

1.4 The diﬀerent types of mass transfer

75

which because x˜B = 1 − x˜A can also be written as

xB d 1 d˜ =0 dy x˜B dy or

xB d2 ln˜ xB d dln˜ = =0 2 dy dy dy

(1.170)

It has to be solved under the boundary conditions x˜B (y = y1 ) = x˜B1 = 1 − x˜A1

and

x˜B (y = y2 ) = x˜B2 = 1 − x˜A2 The solution is x˜B = x˜B1

x˜B2 x˜B1

y − y1 y2 − y1

.

.

(1.171)

It is easy to check that the solution is correct: Taking logarithms of (1.171), gives the following expression ln

x˜B y − y1 x˜B2 = ln , x˜B1 y2 − y1 x˜B1

which disappears by diﬀerentiating twice with respect to y. Diﬀerentiation of (1.171) gives the diﬀusional ﬂux u jA

= −cD

d˜ xB x˜B d˜ xA x˜B2 = cD = cD ln . dy dy y2 − y1 x˜B1

The associated molar ﬂux is found from (1.168), n˙ A = to be n˙ A =

1 1 u jA = u jA 1 − x˜A x˜B

cD x˜B2 cD 1 − x˜A2 ln = ln . y2 − y1 x˜B1 y2 − y1 1 − x˜A1

(1.172)

The average mole fraction of component B between y = y1 and y = y2 is x˜Bm

1 = y2 − y1

y2 x˜B dy . y1

After insertion of x ˜B from (1.171) and integration this yields x˜Bm =

x˜B2 − x˜B1 . ln(˜ xB2 /˜ xB1 )

(1.173)

76

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

The average mole fraction is the logarithmic mean of the two values x˜B1 and x˜B2 . It is therefore possible to write (1.172) as n˙ A =

cD x˜B2 − x˜B1 cD x˜A1 − x˜A2 = . x˜Bm y2 − y1 (1 − x˜Am ) y2 − y1

(1.174)

For ideal gases (1.173) and (1.174) can be still be written with partial pressures pB and the total pressure p, n˙ A =

pD/Rm T pB2 pD/Rm T ln = (pB2 − pB1 ) , y2 − y1 pB1 (y2 − y1 ) pBm

(1.175)

where pBm is the logarithmic mean partial pressure pBm =

pB2 − pB1 ln (pB2 /pB1 )

.

Equimolar counter diﬀusion appears in the distillation of binary mixtures. In a distillation column the liquid falls downwards, and the vapour ﬂows upwards, Fig. 1.43. As the liquid ﬂowing down the column is colder than the vapour ﬂowing

Fig. 1.43: Mass transfer in distillation

Fig. 1.44: Equimolar diﬀusion between two containers

upwards, chieﬂy the component with the higher boiling point, the so called least volatile component condenses, whilst the vapour from the boiling liquid mainly consists of the components with the lower boiling points, the more volatile components. The molar enthalpy of vaporization is, according to Trouton’s rule, approximately constant for all components. If a certain amount of the least volatile component condenses out from the vapour, then the same number of moles of the more volatile substance will be evaporated out of the liquid. At the phase boundary between liquid and vapour we have cA wA = −cB wB . The reference velocity u is zero because cu = cA wA + cB wB . The molar ﬂux transported to the phase boundary from (1.158) and (1.160) is n˙ A = cA wA = u jA = −cD

d˜ xA . dy

(1.176)

1.4 The diﬀerent types of mass transfer

77

Convective and diﬀusive ﬂows are in agreement with each other. Let us assume that two containers, each containing a diﬀerent gas are linked by a thin pipe between them, Fig. 1.44. Equimolar counter diﬀusion will also take place in this case, if the pressure and temperature of both the gases are the same and obey the thermal equation of state for ideal gases. We consider a volume of gas V in the pipe between the two containers. The thermal equation of state for this volume is p = (NA + NB )Rm T /V . At steady state the total pressure is invariant with time. Therefore dp = (N˙ A + N˙ B )Rm T /V = 0 dt which means that N˙ A = −N˙ B .

1.4.3

Convective mass transfer

Mass transfer from a ﬂowing ﬂuid to the surface of another substance, or between two substances that are barely miscible, depends on the properties of the materials involved and the type of ﬂow. As in the case of convective heat transfer the ﬂow can be forced from outside through, for example, a compressor or a pump. This is known as mass transfer in forced convection. If however mass transfer is caused by a change in the density due to pressure or temperature variations, then we would speak of mass transfer in free convection. Following on from the deﬁnition equation (1.23) for the heat transfer coeﬃcient, the molar ﬂow transferred to the surface (index 0) is described by N˙ A0 := βc AΔcA

(1.177)

n˙ A0 = N˙ A0 /A = βc ΔcA .

(1.178)

and the molar ﬂux is given by

The mass transfer coeﬃcient βc with SI units of m/s or m3 /(s m2 ) is deﬁned using these equations. It is a measure of the volumetric ﬂow transferred per area. The concentration diﬀerence ΔcA deﬁnes the mass transfer coeﬃcient. A useful choice of the decisive concentration diﬀerence for mass transfer has to be made. A good example of this is for mass transfer in a liquid ﬁlm, see Fig. 1.41 where the concentration diﬀerence cA0 − cAδ between the wall and the surface of the ﬁlm would be a a suitable choice. The mass transfer coeﬃcient is generally dependent on the type of ﬂow, whether it is laminar or turbulent, the physical properties of the material, the geometry of the system and also fairly often the concentration diﬀerence ΔcA . When a ﬂuid ﬂows over a quiescent surface, with

78

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

which a substance will be exchanged, a thin layer develops close to the surface. In this layer the ﬂow velocity is small and drops to zero at the surface. Therefore close to the surface the convective part of mass transfer is very low and the diﬀusive part, which is often decisive in mass transfer, dominates. As the diﬀusive part is, according to Fick’s law (1.159), proportional to the concentration gradient at the quiescent surface and therefore approximately proportional to the concentration diﬀerence ΔcA , the mass transfer coeﬃcient can be usefully deﬁned by

d˜ xA j := − cD = βΔcA . (1.179) u A0 dy 0 The diﬀusional ﬂux u jA0 is that at the surface (index 0). Therefore β=

−(cD d˜ xA /dy)0 . ΔcA

(1.180)

The relationship between the molar ﬂux according to (1.178) and the diﬀusional ﬂux from (1.179) is appropriately deﬁned as cA0wA0 = n˙ A0 = u jA0 + cA0u0 = u jA0 + x˜A0 n˙ 0 .

(1.181)

For a vanishing convective ﬂow n˙ 0 → 0 we have cA0 wA0 = n˙ A0 = u j A0 ,

(valid for n˙ 0 → 0)

so that with help from the mass transfer coeﬃcient from (1.179) the molar ﬂux n˙ A0 = βΔcA

(valid for n˙ 0 → 0)

(1.182)

can also be calculated. In reality the concentration proﬁle and the molar ﬂux will diﬀer from the values calculated for n˙ 0 → 0. As an example we will look at the scenario illustrated in Fig. 1.45 where a porous body submerged in liquid A, for example water, has

Fig. 1.45: Mass transfer from a porous body into a gas ﬂow

a gas B, e.g. an alcohol, ﬂowing over it. Liquid A evaporates in gas B, and in reverse gas B mixes with liquid A in the porous body. The convective ﬂux cA0 wA0 + cB0 wB0 = c0 u0 = n˙ 0 does not completely disappear at the surface of the porous body, so that the molar ﬂux of A at the surface is given by the familiar equation n˙ A0 = u jA0 + cA0 u0 = u jA0 + x˜A0 n˙ 0 , where cA0 u0 = x˜A0 c0u0 = x˜A0 n˙ 0 .

1.4 The diﬀerent types of mass transfer

Fig. 1.46: Concentration proﬁle cA (y) in mass transfer with a vanishing convective ﬂow (n˙ 0 → 0) and with ﬁnite convection ﬂows (n˙ 0 > 0) . Mass transfer into the (gaseous) phase

79

Fig. 1.47: Concentration proﬁle cA (y) for vanishing convective ﬂow (n˙ 0 → 0) and for ﬁnite convective ﬂows (n˙ 0 < 0) . Mass transfer out of the (gaseous) phase

The concentration proﬁle is diﬀerent as a result of the ﬁnite convective ﬂux when compared to the proﬁle produced for vanishing convective ﬂux n˙ 0 → 0. The greater the convective ﬂux the larger the deviation in the concentration proﬁle. When the convection ﬂux is in the direction of the wall, n˙ 0 < 0, such as when a vapour is condensing out of a mixture, the concentration proﬁle will be steeper as a result of the convective ﬂux, Fig. 1.47. In conjunction with this the material transported out of the phase by diﬀusion will increase, whilst in the case of mass transport into the phase, Fig. 1.46, the diﬀusional transport decreases. The mass transfer coeﬃcient for vanishing convection ﬂux (n˙ 0 → 0), deﬁned in (1.180) is therefore diﬀerent from that with ﬁnite convection ﬂux, and so it is valid that β(n˙ 0 > 0) < β(n˙ 0 → 0) , as can be seen recognised from Fig. 1.46, and β(n˙ 0 < 0) > β(n˙ 0 → 0) , as is shown in Fig. 1.47. As an abbreviation β(n˙ 0 = 0) = β •

and β(n˙ 0 = 0) = β

can be written. The superscript dot on mass transfer coeﬃcients should indicate that the convection ﬂow n˙ 0 is diﬀerent from zero. Then the molar ﬂux, according to (1.182) can be calculated to be n˙ A0 = β • ΔcA + x˜A0 n˙ 0 .

(1.183)

80

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

At the limit n˙ 0 → 0, of vanishing convective ﬂow or by equimolar diﬀusion, we obtain β • = β = βc , as shown by comparing (1.181) and (1.178). The easiest of all the diﬀerent mass transfer coeﬃcients to investigate is the one for vanishing convective ﬂows. It depends on the ﬂow velocity, for example the speed at which gas B in Fig. 1.45 ﬂows over the porous body, the physical properties of the gas and the geometric form of the porous body. These quantities can be combined,as will be shown later on, for certain geometries into dimensionless numbers,

βL wL ν (1.184) =f , D ν D or Sh = f (Re, Sc) . (1.185) The quantity βL/D, in which β is the mass transfer coeﬃcient, L is a characteristic length, for example the the length of the plate that the gas is ﬂowing over in Fig. 1.45, and D is the diﬀusion coeﬃcient, is called the Sherwood15 number Sh. ν/D is the Schmidt16 number Sc and wL/ν is the Reynolds number Re deﬁned with the average velocity w and the kinematic viscosity ν of the gas. Relationships of the type shown in (1.185) are found either by experiments or in simple cases by solving the associated partial diﬀerential equations. This is the main subject of the theory of mass transfer yet to be discussed. The relationships like those in (1.185) for important practical geometries and ﬂow regimes are available in the relevant literature [1.23] to [1.26]. As the convective ﬂux is often small the mass transfer coeﬃcient β • can be calculated by multiplying β by a correction factor ζ = β •/β, which in most practical applications is only a marginally diﬀerent from 1.

15 Thomas Kilgore Sherwood (1903–1976) completed his PhD under the supervision of Warren K. Lewis, after whom the Lewis number was named, in 1929 at the Massachussetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Boston, USA. The subject of his thesis was “The Mechanism of the Drying of Solids”. He was a professor at MIT from 1930 until 1969. His fundamental work on mass transfer in ﬂuid ﬂow and his book “Absorption and Extraction” which appeared in 1937 made him famous worldwide. 16 Ernst Schmidt (1892–1975) ﬁrst studied civil engineering in Dresden and Munich, and then changed to electrical engineering. After working as an assistant to O. Knoblauch at the laboratory for applied physics at the Technische Hochschule in Munich he became a professor at the Technische Hochschule in Danzig (now Gdansk, Poland) in 1925. Following on from this, in 1937 he became the director of the Institute for Engine Research in the Aeronautics Research Establishment at Braunschweig, and later was made a professor at the Technische Hochschule in Braunschweig. In 1952 he took over from W. Nusselt the chair for Thermodynamics at the Technische Hochschule, Munich. His scientiﬁc works includes solutions of the unsteady heat conduction equation, the investigation of temperature ﬁelds in natural convection and methods to make the thermal boundary layer visible. He ﬁrst used the number, which is now named after him, in a paper on the analogy between heat and mass transfer.

1.5 Mass transfer theories

1.5

81

Mass transfer theories

The calculation of the mass transfer coeﬃcient can be carried out in diﬀerent ways. Therefore a decision has to be made as to the type of problem, and which mass transfer theory is applicable to the solution of this problem, and therefore the determination of the mass transfer coeﬃcient. The most important are the ﬁlm, boundary layer and penetration theories. The essentials of these three theories will be introduced here.

1.5.1

Film theory

Film theory goes back to work by Lewis and Whitman [1.27] from 1924. In order to explain the principles we will assume that a substance A is transferred from a quiescent solid or liquid surface, shown as a ﬂat plate in Fig. 1.48, to ﬂowing ﬂuid B. The concentration of A drops from cA0 at the plate surface to cAδ in the ﬂuid.

Fig. 1.48: Concentration proﬁle at the surface over which a ﬂuid is ﬂowing

Film theory comes from the assumption that mass transfer takes place in a thin ﬁlm of thickness δ near the wall, hence the name. Concentration and velocity should only change in the y direction, but not, as is further assumed, with time or in any other coordinate direction. In steady ﬂow this results in a constant molar ﬂux n˙ A = cA wA of A being transferred in the y direction. If this were not the case, more A would ﬂow into a volume element of the ﬂuid than out of it, and therefore the concentration of substance A would change with the time, or material A could also be ﬂowing in the x direction which would therefore cause a concentration diﬀerence in another coordinate direction. However neither of these scenarios are admissible in terms of the prerequisites for the application of ﬁlm theory. Therefore according to ﬁlm theory dn˙ A =0 . dy

(1.186)

Then for vanishing convective ﬂux n˙ = n˙ A + n˙ B = 0 in the y direction, because of xA /dy n˙ A = u jA + x˜A n˙ = u jA = −cD d˜ we also get

d2 x˜A =0 , dy 2

82

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

if constant values for cD are presupposed. The concentration proﬁle in the ﬁlm is a straight line y x˜A − x˜A0 = . (1.187) x˜Aδ − x˜A0 δ On the other hand for vanishing convection at the wall, n˙ 0 → 0, according to (1.181)

d˜ xA n˙ A0 = β(cA0 − cAδ ) = −cD . (1.188) dy 0 Then from (1.187)

−cD

d˜ xA dy

= −c 0

D D (˜ xAδ − x˜A0 ) = (cA0 − cAδ ) δ δ

and therefore

D . (1.189) δ As the ﬁlm thickness δ is not normally known, the mass transfer coeﬃcient β, cannot be calculated from this equation. However the values for the cases used most often in practice can be found from the relevant literature (i.e. [1.23] to [1.26]) which then allows the ﬁlm thickness to be approximated using (1.189). In ﬁlm theory the mass transfer coeﬃcient β for vanishing convection ﬂux n˙ 0 → 0 is proportional to the diﬀusion coeﬃcient D. A diﬀerent result is obtained when a ﬁnite convective ﬂux n˙ is permitted. As before dn˙ A =0 . dy Then with the molar ﬂux being β=

xA /dy + x˜A n˙ n˙ A = u jA + x˜A n˙ = −cD d˜ we then, using the assumption that cD = constant, get a second order diﬀerential equation d˜ xA d2 x˜A + n˙ −cD =0 , dy 2 dy which has to be solved under the boundary conditions x˜A (y = 0) = x˜A0 and x˜A (y = δ) = x˜Aδ . We can then rearrange the equation into dln˜ xA n˙ = dy cD xA /dy. Integration taking account of the boundary conditions gives with x˜A = d˜ the concentration proﬁle x˜A (y) as n˙ exp( y) − 1 x˜A − x˜A0 cD = . n˙ x˜Aδ − x˜A0 exp( δ) − 1 cD

(1.190)

1.5 Mass transfer theories

83

Fig. 1.49: Stefan correction factor ζ = β • /β from ﬁlm theory

The concentration proﬁle for vanishing convection n˙ → 0 as given in (1.187) is obtained from (1.190). A Taylor series of the exponential function at n˙ = 0 can be developed to indicate this. The material ﬂux transferred to the surface y = 0 (index 0 = wall) in the y-direction is

d˜ xA n˙ A = − cD + x˜A0 n˙ . (1.191) dy 0 According to ﬁlm theory this is constant and equal to the value at the wall, where n˙ A = n˙ A0 and n˙ = n˙ 0 . Diﬀerentiating (1.190) and introducing the result into (1.191) yields n˙ + x˜A0 n˙ . xAδ − x˜A0 ) (1.192) n˙ A = −(˜ nδ ˙ exp( ) − 1 cD When this is compared to (1.183), we get β• =

n/c ˙ . nδ ˙ exp( ) − 1 cD

(1.193)

Putting in the mass transfer coeﬃcient β = D/δ for negligible convection from (1.189), and using the principles of ﬁlm theory the following relationship between the mass transfer coeﬃcients β • and β, as shown in Fig. 1.49, can be found: β• =ζ= β

n/cβ ˙ . n˙ exp( ) − 1 cβ

(1.194)

The factor ζ is known as the “Stefan correction factor”, [1.28]. In order to calculate the mass transferred using ﬁlm theory, the mass transfer coeﬃcient β has to be found. In cases where convection is negligible the mass transferred is calculated from equation (1.181), whilst where convection is signiﬁcant the mass transferred is given by (1.183).

84

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

As a special case (1.192) is also used for the situation of single side mass transfer where n˙ A = n˙ and n˙ B = 0. It then follows from (1.192) that

n˙ A δ x˜A0 − x˜Aδ = exp −1 1 − x˜A0 cD or when solved for n˙ A , n˙ A =

cD 1 − x˜Aδ cD x˜Bδ x˜Bδ = = cβ ln ln ln δ 1 − x˜A0 δ x˜B0 x˜B0

(1.195)

it is in complete agreement with equation (1.172), which was found earlier. In drying a wet material with air, the moisture content is calculated rather than the mole fraction. We will consider, as an example, a solid material, which contains water, that is to be dried by air. The equations and relationships already derived can be used: we give the water index A and the air index B. As the water content in moist air is very low, meaning ln(1 − x˜A ) ≈ −˜ xA , (1.195) can be also be written as n˙ A = cβ (˜ xA0 − x˜Aδ ) . We then want to introduce the speciﬁc humidity or moisture content, which is deﬁned by XA := MA /MB , where MA is the mass of the water and MB is the mass of the dry air, and therefore ˜ = M/N we can also write using the molar mass M ˜ A NA ˜ A x˜A ˜ A x˜A M M M = = . ˜ B NB ˜ B x˜B ˜ B 1 − x˜A M M M Solving for the mole fraction for water gives ˜A ˜ B /M XA M . x˜A = ˜A ˜ B /M 1 + XA M XA =

The water content at ambient pressure is of the order 20·10−3 kg/kg, which makes ˜ A ≈ 0.03 1. The approximation ˜ B /M the term XA M ˜A ˜ B /M x˜A = XA M is then valid. The transferred molar ﬂux of water will be ˜B M n˙ A = cβ (X − XAδ ) ˜ A A0 M with the mass ﬂux as ˜ A = cβ M ˜ B (XA0 − XAδ ) . m ˙ A = n˙ A M ˜ B , we get Using c = p/Rm T and the gas constant for air RB = Rm /M p β (XA0 − XAδ ) m ˙A= RB T for the mass ﬂux of water.

(1.195a)

1.5 Mass transfer theories

1.5.2

85

Boundary layer theory

Boundary layer theory, just like ﬁlm theory, is also based on the concept that mass transfer takes place in a thin ﬁlm next to the wall as shown in Fig. 1.48. It diﬀers from the ﬁlm theory in that the concentration and velocity can vary not only in the y-direction but also along the other coordinate axes. However, as the change in the concentration proﬁle in this thin ﬁlm is larger in the y-direction than any of the other coordinates, it is suﬃcient to just consider diﬀusion in the direction of the y-axis. This simpliﬁes the diﬀerential equations for the concentration signiﬁcantly. The concentration proﬁle is obtained as a result of this simpliﬁcation, and from this the mass transfer coeﬃcient β can be calculated according to the deﬁnition in (1.179). In practice it is normally enough to use the mean mass transfer coeﬃcient 1 βm = L

L β dx . x=0

This can be found, for forced ﬂow from equations of the form Shm = f (Re, Sc) with the mean Sherwood number Shm = βm L/D. The function for the mean Sherwood number is practically identical to that for the average Nusselt number N um = f (Re, P r) and is well known for surfaces over which the ﬂuid ﬂows. For example they can be taken from the VDI-HeatAtlas [1.29], where the Nusselt number has to be replaced by the Sherwood number and the Prandtl number by the Schmidt number. The determination of heat transfer coeﬃcients with the assistance of dimensionless numbers has already been explained in section 1.1.4. This method can also be used for mass transfer, and as an example we will take the mean Nusselt number N um = αm L/λ in forced ﬂow, which can be represented by an expression of the form N um = c Ren P rm (1.196) In (1.196) the quantities c, n, m still depend on the type of ﬂow, laminar or turbulent, and the shape of the surface or the channel over or through which the ﬂuid ﬂows. Correspondingly, the mean Sherwood number can be written as Shm = c Ren Scm .

(1.197)

The average mass transfer coeﬃcient can be calculated from (1.197). It can also be found by following the procedure outlined for average heat transfer coeﬃcients,

86

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

• Fig. 1.50: Stefan correction ζ = βm /βm for ﬁlm, boundary layer and penetration theory, from [1.30]

and dividing (1.197) by (1.196). This then gives a relationship between the heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients,

m Shm Sc βm λ a m = = = Lem N um D αm P r D or αm βm = Lem−1 . (1.198) cp Here m ≈ 1/3 and the dimensionless quantity Le = a/D is called the Lewis17 number, and for ideal gases is of the order of 1, so a general approximation βm = αm/ cp

(1.199)

is valid. Some values for the Lewis number are given in Table 1.5. Table 1.5: Lewis numbers of some gas mixtures at 0 ◦ C and 100 kPa in air Water vapour Carbon dioxide Methanol Ethanol Benzene

0.87 1.33 1.41 1.79 2.40

in hydrogen 1.84 2.34 2.68 3.57 4.24

in carbon dioxide 0.627 — 1.03 1.33 1.74

Equations (1.198) and (1.199) are also known as Lewis’ equations. The mass transfer coeﬃcients βm calculated using this equation are only valid, according 17 Warren Kendall Lewis (1882–1978) studied chemical engineering at the Massachussetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and gained his chemistry PhD in 1908 at the University of Breslau. Between 1910 and 1948 he was a professor at MIT. His research topics were ﬁltration, distillation and absorption. In his paper “The evaporation of a liquid into a gas”, Mech. Engineering 44 (1922) 445–448, he considered simultaneous heat and mass transfer during evaporation and showed how heat and mass transfer inﬂuence each other.

1.5 Mass transfer theories

87

to the deﬁnition, for insigniﬁcant convective currents. In the event of convection • /βm for being important they must be corrected. The correction factors ζ = βm transverse ﬂow over a plate, under the boundary layer theory assumptions are shown in Fig. 1.50. They are larger than those in ﬁlm theory for a convective ﬂow out of the phase, but smaller for a convective ﬂow into the phase.

1.5.3

Penetration and surface renewal theories

The ﬁlm and boundary layer theories presuppose steady transport, and can therefore not be used in situations where material collects in a volume element, thus leading to a change in the concentration with time. In many mass transfer apparatus ﬂuids come into contact with each other or with a solid material for such a short period of time that a steady state cannot be reached. When air bubbles, for example, rise in water, the water will only evaporate into the bubbles where it is in contact with them. The contact time with water which surrounds the bubble is roughly the same as that required for the bubble to move one diameter further. Therefore at a certain position mass is transferred momentarily. The penetration theory was developed by Higbie in 1935 [1.31] for the scenario described here of momentary mass transfer. He showed that the mass transfer coeﬃcient is inversely proportional to the square root of the contact (residence) time and is given by D 2 βm = √ . (1.200) π t Here βm is the mean mass transfer coeﬃcient from time t = 0 to time t. Experience tells us that useful values for the mass transfer coeﬃcient can be obtained when the contact time is calculated from t = d/w, where d is the diameter of the bubbles or droplets which are rising or falling, and w is the mean rise or fall velocity. It is more diﬃcult to determine the contact time of a liquid falling through a packing material with a gas ﬂowing through it. Dankwerts’ surface renewal theory from 1951 [1.32], represents an extension to penetration theory. Higbie always presupposed that the contact time between the phases was the same at all positions in the apparatus. Dankwerts went on to suggest that ﬂuid elements which come into contact with each other, have diﬀerent residence times which can be described by a residence time spectrum. One has to imagine that mass exchange between two diﬀerent materials in the ﬂuid phase takes place in individual ﬂuid cells as indicated in Fig. 1.51. The contact time

Fig. 1.51: Surface renewal theory. Possible ﬂow patterns for contact between two liquids or between a liquid and a gas

88

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

between the individual ﬂuid elements obeys a distribution function, and after a certain amount of time an element can be dislodged from the contact area and be replaced by another one. It is for this reason that we speak of a surface renewal theory. It has been successfully applied in the absorption of gases from agitated liquids. However the fraction of time for surface renewal is equally as unknown as the contact times in penetration theory, so while both theories are useful for the understanding of mass transfer processes, often neither is applicable for the calculation of the quantities involved in mass transfer.

1.5.4

Application of ﬁlm theory to evaporative cooling

We will look at evaporative cooling as an application of ﬁlm theory. A solid, adiabatic, insulated wall is covered by a ﬁlm of water, over which unsaturated humid air ﬂows, as shown in Fig. 1.52. The humid air takes water vapour from the ﬁlm, by which the ﬁlm of water and the air are cooled, until a time and position constant temperature is reached. It will be constant over the whole ﬁlm because the adjoining wall is adiabatic and therefore no heat can be added to it. This adiabatic permanent temperature is called the wet bulb temperature The resistance to mass transfer is only on the gas side. Once the permanent temperature has been reached water still evaporates in the unsaturated air ﬂowing over it. As the temperature of the water ﬁlm is constant, the enthalpy of vaporization required for the evaporation will be removed as heat from the air. Fig. 1.52 indicates how the temperature and partial pressure of the water vapour in the air changes at this permanent state. The wet bulb temperature is lower than the temperature of the humid air ﬂowing over the water surface. Therefore a wet substance can be cooled down to its wet bulb temperature by evaporation. We wish to ﬁnd out the magnitude of the wet bulb temperature. It is determined by the amount of water transferred from the water surface into the humid air. As this is diﬀusion through a semipermeable plane the amount of water (substance A) being transferred to the air at the phase boundary I between the water

Fig. 1.52: Adiabatic evaporative cooling. Temperature ϑ and partial pressure pA of the water in the air

1.5 Mass transfer theories

89

and the air, according to (1.195) is given by ˜ A cβ ln 1 − x˜Aδ , m ˙A=M 1 − x˜AI

(1.201)

when x˜AI is the mole fraction of water vapour in air at the surface of the water and x˜Aδ is the mole fraction at a large distance away from the water surface. As the amount of dry air (substance B) does not change it is useful to introduce the moisture content XA = MA /MB . It is x˜A =

˜A ˜ B /M NA XA M NA = . = ˜A ˜ B /M N NA + NB 1 + XA M

Then (1.201) can also be written as ˜ A cβ ln m ˙A=M

˜A ˜ B /M 1 + XAI M . ˜A ˜ B /M 1 + XAδ M

(1.202)

˙A Here both the moisture content XAI at the water surface and the mass ﬂux m of the water being transferred are still unknowns. At the surface of the water saturation prevails and so the moisture content XAI , as taught by thermodynamics [1.33], is given by ps (ϑI ) (1.203) XAI = 0.622 p − ps (ϑI ) where ps is the saturation pressure of the water vapour at temperature ϑI at the surface. The energy balance is available as a further equation. In order to set this up we will consider a balance region on the gas side, depicted by the dotted lines in Fig. 1.53, from the gas at the surface of the ﬁlm to a point y. The energy balance

Fig. 1.53: Energy balance for evaporative cooling

for a steady-state ﬂow is ˙ A hI = q˙ + m ˙ A h = const . q˙I + m In this equation the heat ﬂuxes q˙I and q˙ are in the opposite direction to the y axis and therefore negative. From diﬀerentiation we get d (q˙ + m ˙ A h) = 0 . dy

90

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

This result and the introduction of q˙ = −λdϑ/dy and dh = cpA dϑ for the temperature pattern ϑ(y) produces the ordinary diﬀerential equation −λ

dϑ d2 ϑ +m ˙ A cpA =0 , 2 dy dy

(1.204)

which has to be solved for the boundary conditions

ϑ(y = 0) = ϑI which gives

and

dϑ q˙I = −λ , dy y =0

m ˙ A cpA q˙I exp ϑ − ϑI = − y −1 . m ˙ A cpA λ

(1.205)

The temperature ϑδ at a large distance y = δ away from the surface is therefore

m ˙ A cpA q˙I (1.206) δ −1 . ϑδ − ϑI = − exp m ˙ A cpA λ If the rate of evaporation is very small m ˙ A → 0, heat will only be transferred by conduction perpendicular to the ﬂow direction of the humid air. The heat ﬂux at the water surface will then be q˙I = α(ϑI − ϑδ )

(m ˙ A → 0) .

(1.207)

The heat transfer coeﬃcient α is deﬁned, just as in section 1.1.3, by this equation. On the other hand with the limit m ˙ A → 0 we obtain, from (1.206): m ˙ A cpA q˙I ϑδ − ϑI = − 1+ δ +···−1 (1.208) m ˙ A cpA λ or

λ (m ˙ A → 0) . (ϑI − ϑδ ) δ As the comparison with (1.207) shows, α = λ/δ. We put this into (1.206) and further note that the heat ﬂow to the water surface is used for evaporation. It can then be said that q˙I = −m ˙ A Δhv , q˙I =

where Δhv is the enthalpy of vaporization of the water at temperature ϑI . Eq. (1.206) is then rearranged to form cpA m ˙ A cpA (ϑδ − ϑI ) . (1.209) = ln 1 + α Δhv The quantities m ˙ A and ϑI are unknowns, so by introducing the mass balance from eq. (1.202) we have a second equation which can be used to ﬁnd these two

1.5 Mass transfer theories

91

unknowns. The mass ﬂux, m ˙ A , can be eliminated from (1.209) with the help of (1.202), leaving the following relationship for the wet bulb temperature ϑI ⎡ ⎤ ˜ A cβcpA /α) (M ˜ ˜ Δhv ⎢ 1 + XAI MB /MA ⎥ ϑδ − ϑ I = − 1⎦ . (1.210) ⎣ ˜ ˜ cpA 1 + XAδ MB /MA In cases of small evaporation rates m ˙ A → 0 this can be simpliﬁed even more. We can then write (1.202) as ˜ B /M ˜A 1 + XAI M m ˙A m ˙A = exp =1+ + ... ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ MA cβ MA cβ 1 + XAδ MB /MA

.

Therefore when the evaporation rate is small, we get ˜ B cβ m ˙A=M

XAI − XAδ . ˜A ˜ B /M 1 + XAδ M

With this, equation (1.208) and q˙I = −m ˙ A Δhv , we get the following relationship for small evaporation rates m ˙A→0 ˜ B cβ Δhv XAI − XAδ ϑδ − ϑI = M . ˜ B /M ˜A α 1 + XAδ M

(1.211)

The wet bulb temperature ϑI , can be obtained from (1.210) or (1.211), and then the moisture content XAI , which is determined by the temperature ϑI , can be found by using (1.203). In reverse, by measuring the wet bulb temperature the moisture content XAδ of the humid air can be calculated using the two equations. The wet bulb hygrometer, sometimes called Assmann’s Aspiration Psychrometer works by this method. It consists of two thermometers, one of which is covered by a porous textile, the lower part of which is dipped into a container full of water, so that the bulb of the thermometer is always wet. Air is blown over the thermometer and after some time it reaches the wet bulb temperature ϑI . Meanwhile the second, so called dry thermometer, indicates the temperature ϑδ of the air ﬂowing around it. With these measured values the moisture content XAδ of the humid air can be found using equation (1.210) or (1.211). Example 1.9: The dry thermometer of a wet bulb hygrometer shows a temperature ϑδ of 30 ◦ C, whilst the wet thermometer indicates a temperature ϑI = 15 ◦ C. The total pressure is p = 1000 mbar. The moisture content XAδ and the relative humidity of the air have to be ˜ A c βmcpA /αm = 1.30, calculated. For humid air, Lewis’ equation (1.198) yields a value of M the enthalpy of vaporization of water at 15 ◦ C is Δhv = 2465.4 kJ/kg, the speciﬁc heat ˜ A = 18.015 kg/kmol, that capacity cpA = 1.900 kJ/kgK and the molar mass of water is M ˜ of the dry air is MB = 28.953 kg/kmol. According to (1.203) with pS (15 ◦ C) = 17.058 mbar, XAI = 0.622·17.058/(1000−17.058) = 1.079 · 10−2 . It then follows from (1.210) that

1.3 2465.4 · 103 1 + 1.079 · 10−2 · 28.953/18.015 (30 − 15)o C = − 1 oC . 1907 1 + XAδ · 28.953/18.015

92

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

This gives XAδ = 5.217 · 10−3 . Almost exactly the same value is obtained using (1.211), where XAδ = 5.182 · 10−3 . The relative humidity is ϕ=

pA 5.217 · 10−3 1000 XAδ p = = 0.196 = 19.6% . = · ◦ pAs 0.622 + XAδ ps (30 C) 0.622 + 5.217 · 10−3 42.46

(This value can also be found from a Mollier’s h1+X , X-diagram).

1.6

Overall mass transfer

Whilst heat is often transferred from one ﬂuid to another via a solid wall between them, in mass transfer one or more components in a phase are transferred to another that is in direct contact with it, and not separated by a solid wall. In ﬂuid ﬂow, the phase boundary has an irregular shape due to the forces acting at the interface between the two phases. As an example we will study the transfer of component A, from a binary gaseous mixture of A and B, into a liquid C in which only A dissolves. The mole fractions of A in the gas phase y˜A and in the liquid phase x˜A are shown in Fig. 1.54. The integral mean values for the mole fractions in each phase are indicated by y˜Am and x˜Am . Component A has to overcome three mass transfer resistances on its way from the gas to the liquid phase: the resistance in the gas phase itself, that at the interface between the two phases and ﬁnally the resistance within the liquid phase. However, mass transfer between the liquid and gas interface is very fast when compared to the much slower speed of the component within either the gas or liquid phases. The resistance at the interface can therefore be neglected, and it can also be assumed that an equilibrium state in terms of mass transfer exists at the interface. As mass transfer is determined by diﬀusion in the two phases, one speaks of a two ﬁlm theory of mass transfer. Its fundamental assumption of equilibrium at the interface is no longer valid if a chemical reaction is taking place there or if traces of a surfactant have collected at the interface. In addition to this, equilibrium at the interface cannot be presumed if very large mass ﬂow rates are to be transferred, as here the mass exchange in the phases is very quick. In the case of equilibrium at the phase boundary, which we want to discuss here, with given values for pressure and temperature, the mole fractions y˜AI and

Fig. 1.54: Mole fractions during mass transfer from a gas to a liquid phase

1.6 Overall mass transfer

93

x˜AI at the phase boundary are linked by the relationship xAI ) pAI = y˜AI p = f (˜

(1.212)

as taught in equilibrium thermodynamics. In the following it will be presumed that, close to the phase boundary, mass transfer is only due to diﬀusion and the convective ﬂows are very small. This allows the use of eq. (1.181), for mass transfer at the phase boundary, for each of the two phases. Taking into account the relationship between the mole fraction and the molar concentration, (cA /c)G = y˜A and (cA /c)L = x˜A (G = gas, L = liquid), it follows that the mass ﬂux in the gas phase is n˙ AI = (βc)G (˜ yAm − y˜AI ) (1.213) and in the liquid phase n˙ AI = (βc)L (˜ xAI − x˜Am) . Which then gives y˜Am − y˜AI =

(1.214)

n˙ AI (βc)G

(1.215)

and

n˙ AI . (1.216) (βc)L The mole fractions y˜AI and x˜AI at the interface are dependent on each other according to the thermodynamic relationship given in (1.212). As gases are only slightly soluble in liquids the mole fraction x˜AI is normally very small. Then because of Henry’s18 law eq. (1.212) can be approximated by the linear relationship x˜AI − x˜Am =

y˜AI = kH x˜AI /p

(1.217)

in which the Henry coeﬃcient for binary mixtures is only dependent on the temperature, kH (ϑ). The mole fraction x˜Am in the liquid can, with the help of Henry’s law, be related to a mole fraction y˜Aeq in the gas phase, such that, y˜Aeq = kH x˜Am /p ,

(1.218)

where y˜Aeq is the mole fraction of A in the gas which is in equilibrium with the liquid mole fraction x˜Am . With (1.217) and (1.218), (1.216) is transformed into y˜AI − y˜Aeq =

n˙ AI kH . (βc)L p

(1.219)

Adding (1.215) and (1.219) gives y˜Am − y˜Aeq = n˙ AI

1 kH + (βc)G (βc)L p

.

18 Named after William Henry (1775–1836), a factory owner from Manchester, who ﬁrst put forward this law in 1803.

94

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

This will then be written as yAm − y˜Aeq ) , n˙ AI = kG (˜

(1.220)

with the gas phase overall mass transfer coeﬃcient 1 1 kH . = + kG (βc)G (βc)L p

(1.221)

Eliminating the mole fraction y˜Am from (1.215) by y˜Am = kH x˜Aeq and the mole fraction y˜AI by (1.217), gives, with (1.216), a relationship equivalent to (1.220) n˙ AI = kL (˜ xAeq − x˜Am )

(1.222)

with the liquid phase overall mass transfer coeﬃcient p 1 1 = + . kL kH (βc)G (βc)L

(1.223)

The resistance to mass transfer according to (1.221) and (1.223) is made up of the individual resistances of the gas and liquid phases. Both equations show how the resistance is distributed among the phases. This can be used to decide whether one of the resistances in comparison to the others can be neglected, so that it is only necessary to investigate mass transfer in one of the phases. Overall mass transfer coeﬃcients can only be developed from the mass transfer coeﬃcients if the phase equilibrium can be described by a linear function of the type shown in eq. (1.217). This is normally only relevant to processes of absorption of gases by liquids, because the solubility of gases in liquids is generally low and can be described by Henry’s law (1.217). So called ideal liquid mixtures can also be described by the linear expression, known as Raoult’s law. However these seldom appear in practice. As a result of all this, the calculation of overall mass transfer coeﬃcients in mass transfer play a far smaller role than their equivalent overall heat transfer coeﬃcients in the study of heat transfer.

1.7

Mass transfer apparatus

In mass transfer apparatus one of two processes can take place. Multicomponent mixtures can either be separated into their individual substances or in reverse can be produced from these individual components. This happens in mass transfer apparatus by bringing the components into contact with each other and using the diﬀerent solubilities of the individual components in the phases to separate or bind them together. An example, which we have already discussed, was the transfer of a component from a liquid mixture into a gas by evaporation. In the following section we will limit ourselves to mass transfer devices in which physical processes take place. Apparatus where a chemical reaction also inﬂuences the

1.7 Mass transfer apparatus

95

mass transfer will be discussed in section 2.5. Mass will be transferred between two phases which are in direct contact with each other and are not separated by a membrane which is only permeable for certain components. The individual phases will mostly ﬂow countercurrent to each other, in order to get the best mass transfer. The separation processes most frequently implemented are absorption, extraction and rectiﬁcation. In absorption one or more components from a gaseous mixture are absorbed by either a liquid or a solid. In extraction individual components of a mixture of solids or liquids are dissolved in another liquid. Finally, rectiﬁcation is used to separate a liquid mixture into individual components or mixtures, so-called fractions. In this case the liquid ﬂows down the column where it is in contact with the vapour rising up the column and individual components are exchanged between the vapour and liquid. Mass transfer apparatus are normally columns where one phase, generally the gas is introduced at the base of the column, whilst the other phase, usually a liquid, is fed in at the top. In order to intensify the mass transfer the internal surface area of the column should be as large as possible. This can be done by collecting the liquid on internals in the column and bubbling the gas through it. Distillation trays are such internals. A distillation tray is a plate inside the column that holds a pool of the downﬂowing liquid, usually a few centimetres deep, through which the upwards ﬂowing vapour passes. An alternative is the addition of packing in the column which also hold a pool of the downﬂowing liquid which the rising vapour passes through, thereby encouraging good mixing between the two phases. The most frequently used packing include spheres, rings with ﬂat or grooved surfaces, cross-partition rings, saddle packings, wire gauze or wire helices. Information on the diﬀerent designs for mass transfer devices can be found in the literature [1.34]. The various types of mass transfer apparatus will not be discussed in this book as we are only interested in determining the size of the apparatus needed for a given separation process.

1.7.1

Material balances

A material balance is always required to determine the size of mass transfer apparatus, irrespective of the design. So as the energy balance links the temperatures of the ﬂuid ﬂows in a heat exchanger, the mass balance delivers the concentrations of the ﬂuids. As a typical example of an application we will look at an absorption column, Fig. 1.55, in which component A in a gas mixture ﬂowing up the column is dissolved in a liquid ﬂowing countercurrent to it. We will presume that contact between two immiscible phases occurs, so that the following balance equations are valid, independent of whether a packed, falling ﬁlm or plate column is being investigated. The raw gas consists of a carrier gas

96

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Fig. 1.55: Countercurrent absorber

G and the component A which will be absorbed. The liquid is made up of the solvent L and the absorbed component A. The molar ﬂow rate, in a cross section, of the rising gas is therefore N˙ G + N˙ GA , and that of the liquid ﬂowing downwards is N˙ L + N˙ LA . As the molar ﬂow rates N˙ G and N˙ L do not change through the column the composition of the streams can be described by the mole ratios of the component to the solvent or the carrier gas ˜ = N˙ LA /N˙ L and Y˜ = N˙ GA /N˙ G , X ˜ is the average mole ratio of component A in the liquid and Y˜ is the where X average mole ratio of A in the gas phase. The material balance over the total column between the inlet i and the outlet (exit) e of the liquid is ˜ i − N˙ G Y˜i − N˙ L X ˜ e + N˙ G Y˜e = 0 N˙ L X or

N˙ L Y˜e − Y˜i = . (1.224) ˜i ˜e − X N˙ G X The changes in the gas and liquid compositions are determined by the ratio of the molar ﬂow rates of the gas and liquid streams. The corresponding material balance for a control volume between stage e and any other stage b inside the column is, ˜ i − N˙ G Y˜i − N˙ L X ˜ + N˙ G Y˜ = 0 N˙ L X or

N˙ L ˜ Y˜ = X+ N˙ G

N˙ L ˜ Y˜i − Xi N˙ G

.

(1.225)

˜ has an Therefore at any stage in the column the average liquid mole ratio X ˜ associated value for the average gas mole ratio Y . Equation (1.225) is represented ˜ by a straight line in a Y˜ , X-diagram. In a similar manner to that for the absorption column a linear relationship between the compositions of the two phases can be found for extraction and rectiﬁcation. To illustrate this we will look at a rectiﬁcation column. The basic process

1.7 Mass transfer apparatus

97

Fig. 1.56: Continuous rectiﬁcation. Rectifying column R, condenser C and boiler V

of rectiﬁcation is when boiling a multicomponent mixture the vapour generated ﬂows upwards countercurrent to the condensate which falls down the column. As the condensate is colder than the vapour, the components with higher boiling points, the least volatile, condense. They release their enthalpy of condensation to the components with the lower boiling points, the so called more volatile components, which are vaporized. This causes the vapour to become rich in the more volatile components while the less volatile components make up the liquid. The basic concept of a rectiﬁcation column is shown in Fig. 1.56. The liquid mixture which is to be separated, called the feed, ﬂows into a still or boiler V with a molar ﬂow rate N˙ F . In the boiler, heat Q˙ V is added to generate vapour which then ﬂows towards the top of the column. After the vapour leaves the top of the column it is fed to a condensor C where heat Q˙ C is removed and hence the vapour is totally condensed. Part of the condensate is fed back into the top of the column as reﬂux and ﬂows countercurrent back down the column, all the while undergoing heat and mass transfer with the rising vapour. The rest of the condensate, known as the distillate, is taken away as the product stream N˙ D . To ensure that the composition in the still is constant a further stream of ﬂowrate N˙ B must constantly be removed from the bottom of the column. This stream is called the bottom product. The material balance over the whole column is N˙ F N˙ F x˜F From which follows

= N˙ D + N˙ B = N˙ D x˜D + N˙ B x˜B . N˙ D x˜F − x˜B = . x˜D − x˜B N˙ F

(1.226)

The mole fractions of the feed, bottom product and the distillate determine the ratio of feed to product ﬂow rates. In a control volume from the top of the column to any cross section b, as shown in the right hand picture in Fig. 1.56, the material

98

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

balance is as follows, when the mole fraction of the volatile components in the vapour is represented by y˜, and the fraction in the liquid is indicated by x˜, N˙ G = N˙ L + N˙ D and N˙ G y˜ = N˙ L x˜ + N˙ D x˜D . As shown previously both equations yield a linear relationship between y˜ and x˜: y˜ =

1.7.2

N˙ D N˙ L x˜ + x˜D . N˙ L + N˙ D N˙ L + N˙ D

(1.227)

Concentration proﬁles and heights of mass transfer columns

The global mass balance allows the average composition in a phase to be associated with that of the other phase. However, the local composition changes are still not known. In order to ﬁnd this out a similar balance to that around a diﬀerential element in a heat exchanger, in this case a mass balance must be completed. Integration then gives the composition pattern along the whole exchanger. Once the concentration changes in the column are determined, the height of the column for a required outlet concentration of one of the components, can be calculated. The procedure for completing this task will be shown using, once again, the examples of a absorber and a packed rectiﬁcation column. This type of calculation does not have to be carried out for a plate column because the two phases are well mixed on each plate. This means that on each individual plate a state of equilibrium can be presumed. Therefore a volume element is identical to an equilibrium stage, and the height of the column can be obtained from the number of equilibrium stages required for a particular separation. This is a thermodynamic rather then mass transfer problem. This explains why a mass transfer device, such as a distillation column can be sized without any knowledge of the laws of mass transfer. A packed column is ﬁlled with a packing material. The complex shape of the packing makes it diﬃcult to ascertain the area of the phase interface where mass transfer takes place. Therefore only the product of the mass transfer coeﬃcients and the interface area will be determined. The area of the interface AI is related to the volume of the empty column VK , and the interface area per volume a∗ is deﬁned by a∗ := AI /VK with the volume VK = AK Z, where AK is the cross sectional area of the empty column and Z is its height.

1.7 Mass transfer apparatus

99

We will ﬁrst consider a control volume between two cross sections in an absorber, separated by a distance dz, Fig. 1.57. The amount of material transferred to the liquid over the interface area dAI n˙ AI dAI = n˙ AI a∗ AK dz is given up by the gas which eﬀectively reduces the amount of component A in the gas phase by N˙ G dY˜ . Simultaneously the amount of component A in the liquid ˜ It is therefore valid that increases by −N˙ G dY˜ = N˙ L dX. n˙ AI a∗AK dz = −N˙ G dY˜ .

(1.228)

The molar ﬂux n˙ AI is given by (1.220), under the assumption that the amount of component A in the liquid and vapour phases is small, and so the values for the mole fractions y˜Am = Y˜ and y˜Aeq = Y˜eq can be replaced by mole ratios. It then follows from (1.228) that kG (Y˜ − Y˜eq ) a∗ AK dz = −N˙ G dY˜ and

−N˙ G dY˜ (1.229) (kG a∗ )AK Y˜ − Y˜eq which is comparable to the relationship for heat transfer in countercurrent ﬂow, eq. (1.112). When integrating, the change in the mole ratio Y˜eq at the phase boundary along the length of the column, and therefore that of the average mole ratio Y˜ must be considered. The balance equation (1.225) gives dz =

˙ ˜ = NG (Y˜ − Y˜i ) + X ˜i . X N˙ L ˜ with k + = kH /p it follows that Then using Henry’s law, Y˜eq = kH+ X H N˙ G ˜ ˜i . (Y − Y˜i ) + kH+ X Y˜eq = kH+ N˙ L

(1.230)

This allows Y˜ − Y˜eq to be expressed as a linear function of the mole ratio Y˜ such that ˙ N˙ G ˜ + NG + ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ Y − kH Xi − (1.231) Y − Yeq = 1 − kH Yi = aY˜ − b . N˙ L N˙ L

Fig. 1.57: Mass transfer in an absorber

100

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Equation (1.229) can then be transformed into dz =

−N˙ G dY˜ . ∗ (kG a )AK aY˜ − b

(1.232)

The variation of the mole ratio Y˜ (z) over the height of the column can be found by integration. Using (1.225), the equation for the straight line from the material ˜ the mole ratio in the liquid, which corresponds to each balance, the value for X, ˜ Y , the mole ratio in the gas, can be calculated. It then follows from (1.232) that −N˙ G z= (kG a∗ )AK

Y˜ Y˜e

dY˜ aY˜ − b −N˙ G ln = ∗ (kG a )AK a aY˜ − b aY˜e − b

or with (1.231) we get z=

N˙ (Y˜ − Y˜eq )o G ln . Y˜ − Y˜eq (kG a∗)AK 1 − kH+ N˙ G /N˙ L

(1.233)

The necessary column height Z can be found from this equation, when proceeding to the liquid inlet cross section i at the top of the column Z=

N˙ G (Y˜ − Y˜eq )e ln . (kG a∗ )AK (1 − kH+ N˙ G /N˙ L ) (Y˜ − Y˜eq )i

(1.234)

The meaning of the mole ratio variations (Y˜ − Y˜eq )e and (Y˜ − Y˜eq )i are shown in Fig. 1.58.

Fig. 1.58: Equilibrium and operating line of an absorber

The material balance from (1.228) is once again the starting point for investigating the concentration proﬁle in a packed column being used to rectify a gaseous

1.7 Mass transfer apparatus

101

mixture. In this case the mole fractions will be used instead of the mole ratios. y , wherein N˙ G The amount transferred from the gas to the liquid phase is −N˙ G d˜ is now the molar ﬂow rate of the gas mixture rather than that of the carrier gas as in (1.228). Equation (1.228) is therefore replaced by n˙ AI a∗ AK dz = −N˙ G d˜ y .

(1.235)

Taking the molar ﬂux from equation (1.220), in which we put the abbreviations y˜Am = y˜ and y˜Aeq = y˜eq , we get dz =

d˜ y −N˙ G , ∗ (kG a )AK y˜ − y˜eq

(1.236)

which corresponds to equation (1.229). Integration yields the concentration proﬁle y˜(z) over the height z to be y˜ −N˙ G d˜ y . z= ∗ (ka )AK y˜ − y˜eq

(1.237)

y˜e

The required height Z for the column can be calculated by integrating to the point y˜ = y˜e . The evaluation of this integral is often only possible numerically as the mole fraction y˜eq is normally a complex function of the mole fraction x˜ of the liquid, and therefore according to the balance equation (1.227) is still dependent on the mole fraction y˜. How the mole fractions at equilibrium are ascertained is dealt with in the thermodynamics of phase equilibria. Example 1.10: A washing solution consisting of a mixture of high boiling hydrocarbons is fed into the top of a packed column. It is envisaged that it will remove benzene contained in the air that is rising up the column. The molar content of benzene at the base of the column (cross section a) is 3 %, and by the time the air reaches the top of the column (cross section e) 90 % of its benzene content must have been removed. The washing solution is fed into the column with a molar benzene ratio of 0.3 %. Raoult’s law y˜A = (pAs /p)˜ xA is valid for the solubility of benzene (substance A) in the washing solution, with pAs (ϑ) as the saturation pressure of pure benzene, which at the prevailing temperature of 30 ◦ C, has a value of pAs = 159.1 mbar. The total pressure is p = 1 bar. The benzene free washing solution is fed to the column at a rate of N˙ L = 2.5 mol/s, with a ﬂow rate of N˙ G = 7.5 mol/s for the benzene free air. The inner diameter of the column is dK = 0.5 m. The mass transfer coeﬃcients are (βc)G a∗ = 139.3 mol/m3 s and (βc)L a∗ = 3.139 mol/m3 s. How high does the column have to be to meet the desired air purity conditions? As the benzene content is very low, in Raoult’s law the mole fractions can be replaced by + ˜ + = pAs /p = 0.1591. According XA , with kH the mole ratios and can be written as Y˜A = kH to equation (1.221) we get

+ kH 1 0.1591 m3 s 1 1 + = + = k G a∗ (β c)G a∗ (β c)L a∗ 139.3 3.139 mol kG a∗ = 17.28 mol/(m3 s). The benzene content of the washing solution leaving the column, from (1.224) is ˙ ˜e = NG (Y˜e − Y˜i ) + X ˜ i = 7.5 (0.03 − 0.003) + 0.003 = 0.084. X 2.5 N˙ L

102

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

Furthermore

Y˜eqi

=

+ ˜ Xi = 0.1591 · 0.003 = 4.773 · 10−3 kH

Y˜eqe

=

+ ˜ Xe = 0.1591 · 0.084 = 1.336 · 10−2 . kH

The required column height according to (1.234)is calculated to be Z=

0.03 − 0.001336 7.5 ln m = 10.28 m. 17.28 · 0.196 (1 − 0.1591 · 3) 0.03 − 0.000473

1.8 Exercises

1.8

103

Exercises

1.1: The outer wall of a room is made of brickwork with λ = 0.75 W/K m. It has a thickness of δ = 0.36 m and a surface area of A = 15.0 m2 . Its surface temperatures are ϑ1 = 18.0 ◦ C and ϑ2 = 2.5 ◦ C. The heat loss Q˙ through the wall is to be calculated. How would the value for Q˙ change if the wall was made of concrete blocks with λ = 0.29 W/K m and a wall thickness of δ = 0.25 ? 1.2: The thermal conductivity is linearly dependent on the temperature, λ = a + b ϑ. Prove equation (1.12) for the mean thermal conductivity λm . 1.3: The steady temperature proﬁle ϑ = ϑ(x) in a ﬂat wall has a second derivative d2 ϑ/dx2 > 0. Does the thermal conductivity λ = λ(ϑ) of the wall material increase or decrease with rising temperature? 1.4: A copper wire with diameter d = 1.4 mm and speciﬁc electrical resistance of rel = 0.020 · 10−6 Ω m is surrounded by a plastic insulation of thickness δ = 1.0 mm, which has a thermal conductivity of λ = 0.15 W/K m. The outer surface of the insulation will be maintained at a temperature of ϑW2 = 20 ◦ C. What is the largest current which can be applied to the wire if the inner temperature of the insulation is not allowed to rise above 30 ◦ C? 1.5: A heat ﬂow Q˙ = 17.5 W is generated inside a hollow sphere of dimensions d1 = 0.15 m, d2 = 0.25 m and thermal conductivity λ = 0.68 W/K m. The outer surface of the sphere has a temperature of ϑW2 = 28 ◦ C. What will the temperature of the inner surface be? 1.6: A ﬂat body of thickness h and thermal conductivity λ has the shape of a right angled triangle whose short sides are of length l. The plane temperature proﬁle of this body is given as ϑ(x, y) = ϑ0 + ϑ1 (y/l)2 − (x/l)2 ; 0 ≤ x ≤ l, 0 ≤ y ≤ x. a) Where do the highest and lowest temperatures ϑmax and ϑmin appear? How are they related to the given temperatures ϑ0 and ϑ1 ? 0 < ϑ1 < ϑ0 can be assumed to be valid. b) The values for grad ϑ and the vector q˙ for the heat ﬂux have to be calculated. At ˙ largest? which point is |q| c) Calculate the heat ﬂow through the three boundary surfaces indicated by y = 0, x = l and y = x, and show that as much heat ﬂows into the triangle as ﬂows out. 1.7: A saucepan contains water which boils at ϑs = 100.3 ◦ C. The base of the saucepan (diameter d = 18 cm) is electrically heated. It reaches a temperature of ϑW = 108.8 ◦ C with a thermal power input of 1.35 kW. How big is the heat transfer coeﬃcient of the boiling water, based on the temperature diﬀerence (ϑW − ϑs ) ? 1.8: The temperature proﬁle ϑ = ϑ(y) in the thermal boundary layer (0 ≤ y ≤ δt ) can be approximated to be a parabola ϑ(y) = a + by + cy 2 whose apex lies at the point y = δt . What is the value of the local heat transfer coeﬃcient, α, if δt = 11 mm and λ = 0.0275 W/K m (air)?

104

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

1.9: In heat transfer in forced turbulent ﬂuid ﬂow through a tube, the approximation equation N u = C Re4/5 P r 1/3 . can be applied. The characteristic length in the N u and Re numbers is the inner diameter of the tube d. Calculate the ratio αW /αA of the heat transfer coeﬃcients for water and air for the same ﬂow velocity w and inner tube diameter d at the same mean temperature ϑ = 40 ◦ C. The material properties required to solve this exercise are available in Table B1 for water and B2 for air in the appendix. 1.10: Heat is generated inside a very long hollow cylinder of length L due to radioactive ˙ decay. This heat ﬂow per length of the cylinder, has a value of Q/L = 550 W/m. The hollow cylinder is made of a steel alloy (λ = 15 W/K m), with inner diameter di = 20 mm and wall thickness δ = 10 mm. Heat is only given up from its outer surface into space (T = 0 K) by radiation. The emissivity of the cylinder surface is ε = 0.17. Calculate the Celsius temperatures ϑi of the inner and ϑo of the outer surfaces. What is the value for the radiative heat transfer coeﬃcient αrad ? 1.11: A house wall is made up of three layers with the following properties (inside to outside): inner plaster δ1 = 1.5 cm, λ1 = 0.87 W/K m; wall of perforated bricks δ2 = 17.5 cm, λ2 = 0.68 W/K m; outer plaster δ3 = 2.0 cm, λ3 = 0.87 W/K m. The heat transfer coeﬃcients are α1 = 7.7 W/m2 K inside and α2 = 25 W/m2 K outside. Calculate the heat ﬂux, q, ˙ through the wall, from inside at ϑ1 = 22.0 ◦ C to the air outside at ϑ2 = −12.0 ◦ C. What are the temperatures ϑW1 and ϑW2 of the two wall surfaces? 1.12: In order to reduce the heat loss through the house wall in exercise 1.11, an insulating board with δ3 = 6.5 cm and λ3 = 0.040 W/K m along with a facing of δ4 = 11.5 cm and λ4 = 0.79 W/K m will replace the outer plaster wall. Calculate the heat ﬂux q˙ and the surface temperature ϑW1 of the inner wall. 1.13: Steam at a temperature of ϑi = 600 ◦ C ﬂows in a tube of inner diameter d1 = 0.25 m and outer diameter d2 = 0.27 m made of a steel alloy (λ1 = 16 W/K m). The heat transfer coeﬃcient is αi = 425 W/m2 K. The tube is insulated with a rock wool layer of thickness δ2 = 0.05 m, on whose outer surface a hull of mineral ﬁbres of thickness δ3 = 0.02 m is attached. The heat transfer coeﬃcient between the hull and the air at temperature ϑo = 25 ◦ C is αo = 30 W/m2 K. The thermal conductivity of the rock wool varies according to the temperature:

2 λ2 (ϑ) ϑ ϑ = 0.040 − 0.0005 + 0.0025 . W/K m 100 ◦ C 100 ◦ C The mean thermal conductivity of the mineral ﬁbre hull is λm3 = 0.055 W/K m. Calculate ˙ the heat lost per length L of the tube Q/L and check whether the temperature of the mineral ﬁbre hull is below the maximum permissible value of ϑmax = 250 ◦ C. 1.14: A cylindrical drink can (d = 64 mm, h = 103 mm) is taken out of a fridge at ϑF0 = 6 ◦ C and placed in a room where the air temperature is ϑA = 24 ◦ C. Calculate the temperature ϑF of the can after it has been there for 2 hours. In addition to this ﬁnd the time, t∗ , it takes for the temperature of the can to reach ϑF = 20 ◦ C. The only meaningful resistance to the overall heat transfer between the air and the contents of the can is that on the outside of the can which is given by αo = 7.5 W/m2 K. The material properties of the drink are F = 1.0 · 103 kg/m3 and cF = 4.1 · 103 J/kgK.

1.8 Exercises

105

1.15: Derive the equations for the proﬁle of the ﬂuid temperatures ϑ1 = ϑ1 (z) and ϑ2 = ϑ2 (z) in a countercurrent heat exchanger, cf. section 1.3.3. 1.16: In a heat pump plant air from outside serves as the heat source, where it is cooled from ϑ2 = 10.0 ◦ C to ϑ2 = 5.0 ◦ C, thereby giving heat to a ﬂuid which will be heated from ϑ1 = −5.0 ◦ C to ϑ1 = 3.0 ◦ C. Its mass ﬂow rate is M˙ 1 = 0.125 kg/s, with a mean speciﬁc heat capacity cp1 = 3.6 kJ/kgK. For this heat transfer task three ﬂow conﬁgurations will be compared: countercurrent, crossﬂow with one row of tubes and counter crossﬂow with two rows of tubes and two passageways (running in opposite directions), see Fig. 1.59. The operating characteristic of these conﬁgurations can be described by the following cf. [1.16]

f 1 f exp(2f /C1 ) with f = 1 − exp(−C1 N1 /2) . = + 1− 1 − ε1 2 2 Determine the required heat transfer capability kA for the heat exchangers with these three ﬂow conﬁgurations.

Fig. 1.59: Counter crossﬂow heat exchanger with two rows of tubes and two passageways

1.17: A component A is to be dissolved out of a cylindrical rod of length L and radius r0 . It diﬀuses through a quiescent liquid ﬁlm of thickness δ which surrounds the rod. Show that the diﬀusional ﬂux is given by cA0 − cAδ N˙ A = D 2πL , ln(r0 + δ)/r0 when D = const and a low concentration of the dissolved component in the liquid ﬁlm is assumed. ˜ A = 46.07 kg/kmol) is present in a cylinder. 1.18: Ethanol (component A, molar mass M The liquid level is, according to Fig. 1.42 at y2 − y1 = δ1 = 1 cm below the top of the cylinder. Dry air (component B) at a pressure of p = 1 bar and temperature T = 298 K ﬂows across the top of the cylinder. a) Calculate the molar ﬂux n˙ A at the beginning of the diﬀusion process. b) After what period of time has the liquid level fallen by δ2 = 1 cm? As the diﬀusion is very slow this part of the exercise can be solved by presuming that each change in the liquid level caused by the diﬀusion can be found using the solution for steady ﬂow. The diﬀusion coeﬃcient for ethanol in air is D = 1.19 · 10−5 m2 /s, the density of liquid ethanol is L = 785 kg/m3 and the saturation pressure at T = 298 K is pAs = 0.079 bar.

106

1 Introduction. Technical Applications

1.19: Ammonia, at 25 ◦ C, ﬂows through a pipe at a rate of V˙ = 10 m3 /h. In order to maintain the pressure in the tube at 1 bar, a small tube of inner diameter 3 mm, has been welded onto the pipe, providing a link to the surrounding air, Fig. 1.60. This tube is spiral wound and 20 m long, so that the loss of ammonia by diﬀusion is very low. How much ammonia in m3 /h is lost and what is the mole fraction of air in the large pipe? The density of ammonia is 0.694 kg/m3 , the diﬀusion coeﬃcient of ammonia in air at 25 ◦ C is D = 0.28 · 10−4 m2 /s

Fig. 1.60: Pressure maintenance in a pipe

1.20: Moist wood at 20 ◦ C is to be dried by air at 0.1 MPa and the same temperature ﬂowing over it. The mass transfer coeﬃcient at the surface of the wood over which the air is ﬂowing is β = 2 · 10−3 m/s, and the mole fraction of water vapour at the wood surface is x ˜A0 = 0.024. How big is the mass ﬂux m ˙ A of the water into the air in kg/m2 s? 1.21: Dry air at 15 ◦ C ﬂows over a water surface. Calculate the wet bulb temperature. Use the material properties given in example 1.8. 1.22: A hot, dry combustion gas at 600 ◦ C and 1 bar ﬂows over the wall of a combustion chamber. To prevent the wall temperature from rising too much, water is blown through the porous wall of the chamber, Fig. 1.61, and then evaporates, which reduces the wall

Fig. 1.61: Cooling of a hot, porous wall by blowing water through it

temperature. How low can the temperature of the wall become and how much water m ˙A in kg/m2 s has to be fed into the chamber to achieve this temperature reduction? ˜ A cβm cpA /αm = 1.3, M ˜ B = 28.953 kg/kmol, M ˜ A = 18.015 kg/kmol and Δhv = Given: M 2346 kJ/kg, cpA = 1.907 kJ/kgK. The heat transfer coeﬃcient between the combustion gas and the water surface is αm = 120 W/m2 K. 1.23: Air with a ﬂow rate of N˙ G = 250 kmol/h which contains a molar ratio of benzene of Y˜e = 0.05 is fed into an absorption column to remove the benzene from the air. A benzene free washing solution with a molar ﬂow rate of N˙ L = 55 kmol/h should remove 95 % of the benzene. What are the molar ratios of the washing solution and the air at the absorber outlet?

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

In this chapter we will deal with steady-state and transient (or non steady-state) heat conduction in quiescent media, which occurs mostly in solid bodies. In the ﬁrst section the basic diﬀerential equations for the temperature ﬁeld will be derived, by combining the law of energy conservation with Fourier’s law. The subsequent sections deal with steady-state and transient temperature ﬁelds with many practical applications as well as the numerical methods for solving heat conduction problems, which through the use of computers have been made easier to apply and more widespread. In conjunction with heat conduction we will also investigate mass diﬀusion. As a result of the analogy between these two molecular transport processes many results from heat conduction can be applied to mass diﬀusion. In particular the mathematical methods for the evaluation of concentration ﬁelds agree to a large extent with the solution methods for heat conduction problems.

2.1

The heat conduction equation

The basis of the solution of complex heat conduction problems, which go beyond the simple case of steady-state, one-dimensional conduction ﬁrst mentioned in section 1.1.2, is the diﬀerential equation for the temperature ﬁeld in a quiescent medium. It is known as the equation of conduction of heat or the heat conduction equation. In the following section we will explain how it is derived taking into account the temperature dependence of the material properties and the inﬂuence of heat sources. The assumption of constant material properties leads to linear partial diﬀerential equations, which will be obtained for diﬀerent geometries. After an extensive discussion of the boundary conditions, which have to be set and fulﬁlled in order to solve the heat conduction equation, we will investigate the possibilities for solving the equation with material properties that change with temperature. In the last section we will turn our attention to dimensional analysis or similarity theory, which leads to the deﬁnition of the dimensionless numbers relevant for heat conduction.

108

2.1.1

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Derivation of the diﬀerential equation for the temperature ﬁeld

Solving a heat conduction problem requires that the spatial and time dependence of the temperature ﬁeld ϑ = ϑ(x, t) is determined. Once this is known the associated vector ﬁeld of the heat ﬂux q˙ can, as a result of Fourier’s law, be calculated by ˙ q(x, t) = −λ grad ϑ(x, t) ,

(2.1)

which then means that the heat ﬂux at any point in the body can be determined. The temperature ﬁeld can be obtained by solving a partial diﬀerential equation, the so called heat conduction equation, which will be derived now. This requires the application of the ﬁrst law of thermodynamics to a closed system, namely a coherent region of any size, imaginarily taken from the conductive body, Fig. 2.1. The volume of this region is V and it has a surface area A. The ﬁrst law produces the following power balance for the region: dU ˙ = Q(t) + P (t) . (2.2) dt The change with time of the internal energy U is caused by two diﬀerent inﬂuences: the heat ﬂow Q˙ and the (mechanical or electrical) power P , which cross the surface of the region.

Fig. 2.1: Region of volume V in a thermal conductive body. Surface element dA of the region with the outward normal n

As the heat conduction is being studied in a solid body, the small change in the density as a result of the temperature and pressure variations can be neglected. The model of an incompressible body = const is therefore used. Under this assumption du d dU = dV (2.3) u dV = dt dt dt (V )

(V )

can be set, where the integral extends over the volume of the region. The speciﬁc internal energy u, introduced here, is dependent on the temperature of the incompressible body. So with c(ϑ) as the speciﬁc heat capacity du = c(ϑ) dϑ

2.1 The heat conduction equation

109

is valid. From (2.3), we obtain dU = dt

c(ϑ)

∂ϑ dV ∂t

(2.4)

(V )

for the change with time of the internal energy in the region under consideration. In order to calculate the heat ﬂow Q˙ over the surface of the region, we will take a surface element dA, which has a normal, n, outward facing vector, Fig. 2.1. The heat ﬂow through dA, into the region is dQ˙ = −q˙ n dA .

(2.5)

The heat ﬂow according to (2.2) is positive when the ﬂow is into the body. In the equation given above the heat ﬂux vector q˙ is positive because its direction is into the region. In contrast the normal vector n is outward facing and so the scalar product is negative. Therefore a minus sign has to be introduced, thereby fulﬁlling the prerequisite for positive heat ﬂow into the region. By integrating all the heat ﬂow rates dQ˙ from (2.5) the total heat ﬂow Q˙ is found to be ˙ Q = − q˙ n dA = − div q˙ dV . (2.6) (A)

(V )

The integral which extends over the area of the region has been converted to the volume integral of the divergence of q˙ according to Gauss’ integral theorem. The power P put into the region is made up of two distinct parts, ﬁrstly the power PV which causes a change in the volume, and secondly the power Pdiss dissipated inside the region. In an incompressible body PV ≡ 0. Pdiss is partly made up of the electrical power put into the body, which in a heat and electricity conducting material will be dissipated as a result of the body’s electrical resistance. This is the so-called ohmic or resistance heating. Energy rich radiation, e.g. γ-rays, which penetrate a solid body from outside will also be absorbed, their energy will be dissipated, thereby contributing to an increase in the internal energy. The power of this dissipative and therefore irreversible energy conversion inside the region is given by ˙ (ϑ, x, t) dV , P = Pdiss = W (2.7) (V )

˙ is the power per volume, the so-called power density. In a body, with a where W speciﬁc electrical resistance re = re (ϑ), which has a current ﬂowing through it, ˙ (ϑ, x, t) = re (ϑ) i2 W e is obtained for the power density, where ie is the electrical ﬂux. Its SI units are A/m2 , so that with Ω m as the SI units for the speciﬁc electrical resistance, we ˙ . obtain units of ΩmA2 /m4 =VA/m3 =W/m3 for W

110

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

The dissipative and irreversible energy conversion inside the body releases thermal energy, in principle acting like an internal heat source. Similarly to the ˙ this internal heat source also contributes to an increase in the external heat Q, internal energy of the body according to (2.6). The same eﬀect is created when chemical or nuclear reactions take place inside a body. These reactions are accompanied by the production of heat generated by the irreversible conversion of chemical or nuclear energy into thermal (internal) energy. With the exception of the less proliferous endothermic chemical reactions, they act as heat sources in solids. Although the chemical composition of the body is changed by a reaction, this will be neglected in the calculation of material properties, and the eﬀect of the reaction is covered only as an internal heat source, which makes a contribution ˙ . Therefore we will consider chemical or nuclear reactions to the power density W only in (2.7), and by neglecting the changes in the composition we can assume that the material properties λ and c only change with temperature ϑ and not with the composition of the solid. Now taking the results for dU /dt from (2.4), Q˙ from (2.6) and P from (2.7) and putting them into the power balance equation (2.2) of the ﬁrst law, and combining all the volume integrals, gives ∂ϑ ˙ c(ϑ) + div q˙ − W (ϑ, x, t) dV = 0 . ∂t (V )

This volume integral only disappears for any chosen balance region if the integrand is equal to zero. This then produces c(ϑ)

∂ϑ ˙ (ϑ, x, t) . = − div q˙ + W ∂t

In the last step of the derivation we make use of Fourier’s law and link the heat ﬂux q˙ according to (2.1) with the temperature gradient. This gives us c(ϑ)

∂ϑ ˙ (ϑ, x, t) , = div [λ(ϑ) grad ϑ] + W ∂t

(2.8)

the diﬀerential equation for the temperature ﬁeld in a quiescent, isotropic and incompressible material with temperature dependent material properties c(ϑ) and λ(ϑ). The heat sources within the thermally conductive body are accounted for ˙ . by the power density W In the application of the heat conduction equation in its general form (2.8) a series of simplifying assumptions are made, through which a number of special diﬀerential equations, tailor made for certain problems, are obtained. A signiﬁcant simpliﬁcation is the assumption of constant material properties λ and c. The linear partial diﬀerential equations which emerge in this case are discussed in the next section. Further simple cases are ˙ ≡ 0, – no heat sources: W – steady-state temperature ﬁelds: ∂ϑ/∂t ≡ 0,

2.1 The heat conduction equation

111

– geometric one-dimensional heat ﬂow, e.g. only in the x-direction in cartesian coordinates or only in the radial direction with cylindrical and spherical geometries.

2.1.2

The heat conduction equation for bodies with constant material properties

In the derivation of the heat conduction equation in (2.8) we presumed an incompressible body, = const. The temperature dependence of both the thermal conductivity λ and the speciﬁc heat capacity c was also neglected. These assumptions have to be made if a mathematical solution to the heat conduction equation is to be obtained. This type of closed solution is commonly known as the “exact” solution. The solution possibilities for a material which has temperature dependent properties will be discussed in section 2.1.4. With constant thermal conductivity the diﬀerential operator div [λ(ϑ) gradϑ] in (2.8) becomes the Laplace operator λ div grad ϑ = λ∇2 ϑ , and the heat conduction equation assumes the form ˙ W ∂ϑ = a∇2ϑ + . ∂t c

(2.9)

The constant which appears here is the thermal diﬀusivity a := λ/c

(2.10)

of the material, with SI units m2 /s. In the two most important coordinate systems, cartesian coordinates x, y, z, and cylindrical coordinates r, ϕ, z the heat conduction equation takes the form 2 ˙ W ∂ϑ ∂ ϑ ∂ 2 ϑ ∂ 2ϑ + 2+ 2 + =a (2.11) 2 ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z c 2 ˙ W ∂ϑ 1 ∂ 2ϑ ∂ 2 ϑ ∂ ϑ 1 ∂ϑ + + + =a + (2.12) ∂t ∂r2 r ∂r r2 ∂ϕ2 ∂z 2 c respectively. With spherical coordinates we will limit ourselves to a discussion of heat ﬂow only in the radial direction. For this case we get from (2.9) 2 ˙ W ∂ ϑ 2 ∂ϑ ∂ϑ + + =a . (2.13) 2 ∂t ∂r r ∂r c

or

The simplest problem in transient thermal conduction is the calculation of a temperature ﬁeld ϑ = ϑ(x, t), which changes with time and only in the x-direction.

112

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

˙ ≡ 0. This is A further requirement is that there are no sources of heat, i.e. W known as linear heat ﬂow, governed by the partial diﬀerential equation ∂ϑ ∂ 2ϑ =a 2 . ∂t ∂x

(2.14)

This equation oﬀers a clear interpretation of the thermal diﬀusivity a and the heat conduction equation itself. According to (2.14) the change in the temperature with time ∂ϑ/∂t at each point in the conductive body is proportional to the thermal diﬀusivity. This material property, therefore, has an eﬀect on how quickly the temperature changes. As Table 2.1 shows, metals do not only have high thermal conductivities, but also high values for the thermal diﬀusivity, which imply that temperatures change quickly in metals. Table 2.1: Material properties of some solids at 20 ◦ C Material

λ W/K m

Silver Copper Aluminium Brass (MS 60) Cr-Ni-Steel

427 399 237 113 14.7

Granite Concrete gravel Cork sheets Fat

2.9 1.28 0.041 0.17

c kJ/kg K

kg/m3

106 a m2 /s

0.235 0.382 0.888 0.376 0.502

10500 8930 2700 8400 7800

173 117 98.8 35.8 3.75

0.890 0.879 1.880 1.930

2750 2200 190 910

1.2 0.662 0.11 0.097

The diﬀerential equation (2.14) connects the temperature change with time at a certain point with the curvature of the temperature for the region surrounding this point. It is therefore possible to diﬀerentiate between the three cases shown in Fig 2.2. If ∂ 2ϑ/∂x2 > 0, the temperature rises (heating); more heat ﬂows in from the “right” than ﬂows out to the “left”. This means that energy has to be stored, and so the temperature rises with time. With an opposite sign for the curvature, ∂ 2 ϑ/∂x2 < 0 the temperature falls with time, whilst if ∂ 2 ϑ/∂x2 = 0 the temperature remains constant (steady-state limiting case). ˙ is linearly dependent or independent of the temperIf the thermal power W ature ϑ, the heat conduction equation, (2.9), is a second order linear, partial diﬀerential equation of parabolic type. The mathematical theory of this class of equations was discussed and extensively researched in the 19th and 20th centuries. Therefore tried and tested solution methods are available for use, these will be discussed in 2.3.1. A large number of closed mathematical solutions are known. These can be found in the mathematically orientated standard work by H.S. Carslaw and J.C. Jaeger [2.1]. Steady-state temperature ﬁelds are independent of time, and are the end state of a transient cooling or heating process. It is then valid that ∂ϑ/∂t = 0, from

2.1 The heat conduction equation

113

Fig. 2.2: Importance of the curvature for the temperature change with time according to (2.14)

which ˙ /λ) = 0 ∇2 ϑ + (W

(2.15)

is obtained as the diﬀerential equation for a steady-state temperature ﬁeld with heat sources. The thermal conductivity is the only material property which inﬂuences the temperature ﬁeld. Eq. (2.15) is known as the Poisson diﬀerential ˙ ≡ 0) into the equation. It passes for temperature ﬁelds without heat sources (W potential equation or Laplace diﬀerential equation ∇2 ϑ = 0 .

(2.16)

The Laplace operator ∇2 takes the form given in equations (2.11), (2.12) and (2.13) for the diﬀerent coordinate systems. The diﬀerential equations (2.15) and ˙ (2.16) for steady-state temperature ﬁelds, are linear and elliptical, as long as W is independent of, or changes linearly with ϑ. This leads to diﬀerent methods of solution than those used in transient conduction where the diﬀerential equations are parabolic.

2.1.3

Boundary conditions

The heat conduction equation only determines the temperature inside the body. To completely establish the temperature ﬁeld several boundary conditions must be introduced and fulﬁlled by the solution of the diﬀerential equation. These boundary conditions include an initial-value condition with respect to time and diﬀerent local conditions, which are to be obeyed at the surfaces of the body. The temperature ﬁeld is determined by the diﬀerential equation and the boundary conditions. The initial-value conditions set, for a particular time, a temperature for each position in the body. Timekeeping generally starts at this moment, fulﬁlling the condition ϑ(x, y, z, t = 0) = ϑ0 (x, y, z) . (2.17) The initial temperature proﬁle ϑ0 (x, y, z), given in the problem, for example a

114

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

constant initial temperature throughout a body that is to be cooled, changes during the transient conduction process. The local boundary conditions can be divided into three diﬀerent groups. At the surface of the body 1. the temperature can be given as a function of time and position on the surface, the so-called 1st type of boundary condition, 2. the heat ﬂux normal to the surface can be given as a function of time and position, the 2nd type of boundary condition, or 3. contact with another medium can exist. A given surface temperature is the most simple case to consider, especially when the surface temperature is constant. In the case of a prescribed heat ﬂux q, ˙ the condition ∂ϑ q˙ = −λ (2.18) ∂n must be fulﬁlled at every point on the surface, where the derivative for the outward normal direction is taken and λ is the value of the conductivity at the surface temperature. Adiabatic surfaces frequently appear, and because q˙ = 0, we get ∂ϑ/∂n = 0 .

(2.19)

This simple condition must also be fulﬁlled at planes of symmetry inside the body. Therefore, when formulating a conduction problem, it is often advantageous to only consider a section of the body that is bounded by one or more adiabatic planes of symmetry. If the thermally conductive body is in contact with another medium, several diﬀerent boundary conditions can apply, each depending on whether the other medium is a solid or ﬂuid, and its respective material properties. When the other medium is another solid, the heat ﬂux at the interface of body 1 to body 2 is the same for both bodies. According to (2.18), at the interface, index I, it is valid that (1) (2) ∂ϑ ∂ϑ (1) (2) λ =λ (2.20) ∂n I ∂n I and also (1)

(2)

ϑI = ϑ I

.

(2.21)

The temperature curve has a kink at the interface. The temperature gradient in the body with the lower thermal conductivity is larger, Fig. 2.3 a. Equation (2.21) is only valid if the two bodies are ﬁrmly joined. If this is not the case a contact resistance occurs, which results in a small temperature jump, Fig. 2.3 b. This resistance can be described by a contact heat transfer coeﬃcient αct . In place of equation (2.21), (1) ∂ϑ (1) (2) (1) = αct ϑI − ϑI −λ , (2.22) ∂n I is valid. With constant αct the temperature drop at the interface is proportional to the heat ﬂux.

2.1 The heat conduction equation

115

Fig. 2.3: Temperature at the interface between two bodies 1 and 2 in contact with each other. a no contact resistance, b contact resistance according to (2.22)

If the thermally conductive body is bounded by a ﬂuid, a boundary layer develops in the ﬂuid. The heat ﬂux into the ﬂuid, with α as the heat transfer coeﬃcient is q˙ = α (ϑW − ϑF ) , see Fig. 2.4 and section 1.1.3. As this heat ﬂux must be transported to the surface of the body by conduction, the following boundary condition is obtained ∂ϑ −λ = α (ϑW − ϑF ) . (2.23) ∂n W Here λ is the thermal conductivity of the solid (not the ﬂuid!) at the wall. Eq. (2.23) stipulates a linear relationship between the temperature ϑW and the slope of the temperature proﬁle at the surface, this is also known as the 3rd type of boundary condition. As in (2.18), ∂ϑ/∂n is the derivative in the normal direction outward from the surface. The ﬂuid temperature ϑF , which can change with time, and the heat transfer coeﬃcient α must be given for the solution of the heat conduction problem. If α is very large, the temperature diﬀerence (ϑW − ϑF ) will be very small and the boundary condition (2.23) can be replaced by the simpler boundary condition of a prescribed temperature (ϑW = ϑF ). The boundary condition in (2.23) is only linear as long as α is independent of ϑW or (ϑW − ϑF ), this factor is very important for the mathematical solution of heat conduction problems. In a series of heat transfer problems, for example in free convection, α changes with (ϑW − ϑF ), thereby destroying the linearity of the boundary condition. The same occurs when heat transfer by radiation is considered, as in this

Fig. 2.4: Temperature proﬁle for the boundary condition (2.23). The tangent to the temperature curve at the solid surface meets the guidepoint R at the ﬂuid temperature ϑF at a distance away from the surface s = λ/α = L0 /Bi. The subtangent of the temperature proﬁle in the ﬂuid boundary layer is su = λF /α = L0 /N u.

116

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

4 case q˙ is dependent on TW , see section 1.1.5. A closed solution for the thermal conduction problem is not possible in cases such as these, so numerical methods have to be applied and this will be discussed in 2.4.

In the cooling or heating of a vessel which contains a ﬂuid, the temperature ϑF of this ﬂuid can often be taken as spatially constant, as the temperatures in each individual part of the ﬂuid will be equalized either by convection or mixing. The change in the temperature ϑF = ϑF (t) over time depends on the manner in which heat is transferred from the vessel wall (the conductive body) to the ﬂuid. This causes a change in the internal energy of the ﬂuid and a corresponding variation in ϑF . The heat ﬂux is then ∂ϑ q˙ = −λ ∂n W (thermal conduction in the vessel wall) and also q˙ = cF

MF dϑF A dt

(heating the ﬂuid) with cF as the speciﬁc heat capacity of the ﬂuid and MF as the mass of the ﬂuid, which is in contact with the vessel wall (area A). We then have the boundary condition MF dϑF ∂ϑ =0 . (2.24) cF +λ A dt ∂n W This is to be supplemented by a heat transfer condition according to (2.23), or if a large heat transfer coeﬃcient exists by the simpliﬁed boundary condition ϑW = ϑF .

2.1.4

Temperature dependent material properties

If the temperature dependence of the material properties λ = λ(ϑ) and c = c(ϑ) cannot be neglected then the heat conduction equation (2.8) must be the starting point for the solution of a conduction problem. We have a non-linear problem, that can only be solved mathematically in exceptional cases. With div [λ(ϑ) grad ϑ] = λ(ϑ) div grad ϑ +

dλ grad2 ϑ dϑ

we obtain from (2.8) c(ϑ)

dλ ∂ϑ ˙ = λ(ϑ)∇2 ϑ + grad2 ϑ + W ∂t dϑ

(2.25)

as the heat conduction equation. The non-linearity is clearly shown in the ﬁrst two terms on the right hand side. Equations (2.8) and (2.25) assume a simpler form when a new variable, the transformed temperature 1 Θ = Θ0 + λ0

ϑ λ(ϑ) dϑ ϑ0

(2.26)

2.1 The heat conduction equation

117

is introduced. Here λ0 is the value for the thermal conductivity at the reference temperature ϑ0 assigned to the transformed temperature Θ0 . From (2.26) we get λ ∂ϑ ∂Θ = ∂t λ0 ∂t

and

grad Θ =

λ grad ϑ . λ0

Following on from (2.8), we obtain c(ϑ)

λ0 ∂Θ ˙ = λ0 ∇2Θ + W λ(ϑ) ∂t

or

˙ 1 ∂Θ W , (2.27) = ∇2 Θ + a(ϑ) ∂t λ0 an equation which formally agrees with the heat conduction equation (2.9) for constant material properties. The thermal diﬀusivity a however depends on ϑ or Θ. Experience tells us that a varies less with temperature than λ, so a(ϑ) in (2.27) can be assumed to be approximately constant. A solution of the heat conduction equation for constant material properties can be applied to the case of temperature dependent properties by replacing ϑ by Θ. There is however, one important limitation: only boundary conditions with given temperature or heat ﬂux (2.18) can be stipulated, as the heat transfer condition (2.23) is not retained by the transformation (2.26). The transformation (2.26) is used particularly in steady-state heat conduction problems, because the term which contains the temperature dependent a disappears due to ∂Θ/∂t = 0. Solving of the Poisson, or in ˙ = 0 the Laplace equation can immediately be undertaken, provided the case of W that the boundary conditions of a given temperature or heat ﬂux, and not the heat transfer condition according to (2.23), exist. In most temperature dependent material property cases a closed solution can not be obtained. A numerical solution is the only answer in such cases and we will look more closely at this type of solution in section 2.4.

2.1.5

Similar temperature ﬁelds

The advantage of introducing dimensionless variables has already been shown in section 1.1.4. The dimensionless numbers obtained in that section provide a clear and concise representation of the physical relationships, due to the signiﬁcant reduction in the inﬂuencing variables. The dimensionless variables for thermal conduction are easy to ﬁnd because the diﬀerential equations and boundary conditions are given in an explicit form. The starting point for the derivation of the dimensionless numbers in thermal conduction is the diﬀerential equation ˙ ∂ϑ ∂ 2ϑ W =a 2 + ∂t ∂x c

118

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

which contains all the signiﬁcant terms, time dependence, local variations of the ˙ of heat sources. Introducing a temperature ﬁeld as well as the power density W dimensionless position coordinate and a dimensionless time gives x+ := x/L0

,

t+ := t/t0 .

Here, L0 is a characteristic length of the conductive body and t0 is a characteristic time (interval) which still has to be determined. We choose ϑ+ := (ϑ − ϑ0 ) /Δϑ0 ,

(2.28)

as a dimensionless temperature, wherein ϑ0 is a reference temperature (zero point of ϑ+ ) and Δϑ0 is a characteristic temperature diﬀerence of the problem. The heat conduction equation takes the dimensionless form of ˙ ∂ϑ+ at0 ∂ 2ϑ+ t0 W . = 2 + 2 + ∂t L0 ∂x+ Δϑ0 c

(2.29)

The characteristic time is chosen to be t0 = L20 /a . The dimensionless time is then t+ = at/L20 .

(2.30a)

This dimensionless time t+ is often called the Fourier number Fo := at/L20 = t+ .

(2.30b)

However the Fourier number is not a dimensionless number in the usual sense, that it has a ﬁxed value for a given problem, instead it is a dimensionless time variable which only has ﬁxed values for ﬁxed times. Now introducing the characteristic power density W˙ 0 = Δϑ0 c/t0 = λΔϑ0 /L20

(2.31a)

as a reference quantity, and with ˙ /W˙ 0 = W ˙ L20 /λΔϑ0 ˙ +=W W

(2.31b)

as the dimensionless heat source function, we obtain from (2.28) ∂ϑ+ ∂ 2 ϑ+ ˙+ . = +W ∂t+ ∂x+2

(2.32)

The heat conduction equation (2.32) does not contain any factors diﬀerent from ˙ + from (2.31b), and so one when we use the dimensionless heat source function W

2.1 The heat conduction equation

119

does not immediately force us to introduce dimensionless numbers. Only the dimensionless parameters, which specify the position, time and temperature depen˙ + , take over the role of dimensionless numbers. Further dimensionless dence of W numbers are expected when the boundary conditions are also made dimensionless. The initial condition (2.17) and the boundary condition for a prescribed temperature are homogeneous in ϑ. They do not automatically lead to dimensionless numbers. However these boundary conditions should be observed for the choice of ϑ0 and Δϑ0 in (2.28), in order to obtain the most favourable dimensionless temperature ϑ+ , for example in the interval 0 ≤ ϑ+ ≤ 1. If the heat ﬂux q˙W is stipulated as a boundary condition, we get from (2.18) the following dimensionless relationship + ∂ϑ + (2.33a) q˙W = − ∂x+ W with + q˙W := q˙W /q˙W0 = q˙W L0 /λΔϑ0 .

(2.33b)

+ contains one or more parameters which describe the The dimensionless function q˙W position and time dependence of the heat ﬂux q˙W , if the special case of q˙W = 0 is disregarded. These dimensionless parameters enter, in the same way as the ˙ + from (2.31b), as dimensionless numbers parameters in the heat source function W into the solution of heat conduction problems. Finally making the heat transfer condition (2.23) dimensionless, gives

∂ϑ+ αL0 + ϑ W − ϑ+ . = F ∂x+ λ

(2.34)

A new dimensionless number appears here and it is known as the Biot1 number Bi := αL0/λ .

(2.35)

The temperature ﬁeld is dependent on this number when heat transfer takes place into a ﬂuid. The Biot number has the same form as the Nusselt number deﬁned by (1.36). There is however one very signiﬁcant diﬀerence, λ in the Biot number is the thermal conductivity of the solid whilst in the Nusselt number λ is the thermal conductivity of the ﬂuid. The Nusselt number serves as a dimensionless representation of the heat transfer coeﬃcient α useful for its evaluation, whereas the Biot number describes the boundary condition for thermal conduction in a solid body. It is the ratio of L0 to the subtangent to the temperature curve within the solid body, cf. Fig. 2.4, whilst the Nusselt number is the ratio of a (possibly diﬀerent choice of) characteristic length L0 to the subtangent to the temperature proﬁle in the boundary layer of the ﬂuid. 1

Jean Baptiste Biot (1774–1862) became Professor of Physics at the Coll`ege de France, Paris in 1800. From 1804 onwards he investigated the cooling of heated rods and in 1816 published the diﬀerential equation for the temperature proﬁle, without giving a clear derivation of the equation. In 1820 he discovered along with F. Savart, the Biot-Savart law for the strength of the magnetic ﬁeld around a conductor with an electrical current passing through it.

120

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Fig. 2.5: Inﬂuence of the Biot number Bi = αL0 /λ on the temperature proﬁle near to the surface. a small Biot number, b large Biot number Interpreting L0 /λ as the speciﬁc thermal conduction resistance of the solid and 1/α as the speciﬁc heat transfer resistance at its surface also allows the Biot number to be interpreted as the ratio of the two resistances L0 /λ Bi = . 1/α A small Biot number means that the resistance to thermal conduction in the body, for example due to its high thermal conductivity, is signiﬁcantly smaller than the heat transfer resistance at its boundary. With small Biot numbers the temperature diﬀerence in the body is small in comparison to the diﬀerence (ϑW − ϑF ) between the wall and ﬂuid temperatures. The reverse is valid for large Biot numbers. Examples of these two scenarios are

a cooling process shown+for in Fig. 2.5. Very large Biot numbers lead to very small values of ϑ+ − ϑ W F , and for Bi → ∞, + according to (2.34) we get ϑ+ W − ϑF → 0. The heat transfer condition (2.34) can be replaced + by the simpler boundary condition ϑ+ W = ϑF .

Temperature ﬁelds in quiescent solid bodies can be represented in dimensionless form by ˙ + , q˙+ , Bi, NGeom . (2.36) ϑ+ = ϑ+ x+ , y + , z + , t+ , W W Here the dimensionless variables and numbers already discussed will be supplemented by dimensionless geometric numbers, which are indicated by the abbreviation NGeom . Characteristic geometric numbers are for example the height to diameter H/D ratio of a thermally conductive cylinder or the ratios L2 /L1 and L3 /L1 of the edge lengths L1 to L3 of a rectangular body. The shape of the function in (2.36) depends on the geometry and the other conditions of the heat conduction problem. In general the dimensionless variables in (2.36) will not all appear at the same time. In steady-state heat conduction t+ disappears; in bod˙ + ≡ 0; and when only prescribed temperatures as ies without any heat sources W + and Bi in (2.36) are not present. boundary conditions are given q˙W Finally, it should also be pointed out that in heat conduction problems the dimensionless representation and the combination of the inﬂuencing quantities into dimensionless numbers are not as signiﬁcant as in the representation and determination of heat transfer coeﬃcients in 1.1.4. In the following sections we will frequently refrain from making the heat conduction problem dimensionless and will only present the solution of a problem in a dimensionless form by a suitable combination of variables and inﬂuencing quantities.

2.2 Steady-state heat conduction

2.2

121

Steady-state heat conduction

We speak of steady-state heat conduction when the temperature at every point in a thermally conductive body does not change with time. Some simple cases, which are of practical importance, have already been discussed in the introductory chapter, namely one dimensional heat ﬂow in ﬂat and curved walls, cf. section 1.1.2. In the following sections we will extend these considerations to geometric one-dimensional temperature distributions with internal heat sources. Thereafter we will discuss the temperature proﬁles and heat release of ﬁns and we will also determine the ﬁn eﬃciency ﬁrst introduced in section 1.2.3. We will also investigate two- and three-dimensional temperature ﬁelds, which demand more complex mathematical methods in order to solve them, so that we are often compelled to make use of numerical methods, which will be introduced in section 2.4.6.

2.2.1

Geometric one-dimensional heat conduction with heat sources

In section 1.2.1 we dealt with geometric one-dimensional heat conduction without internal heat sources. The temperature in these cases was only dependent on one spatial coordinate. The equations for steady heat ﬂow through a ﬂat wall (plate), a hollow cylinder (tube wall) and a hollow sphere were obtained. In the following we will extend these considerations to thermally conductive materials with heat sources. Examples of this include an electrical conductor, through which a current is ﬂowing, where the electrical energy is dissipated, and the cylindrical or spherical fuel elements in a nuclear reactor, in which the energy released during nuclear ﬁssion will be conducted as heat to the surface of the fuel elements. As the heat conduction equation derived in 2.1.1 shows, the only material property which has an eﬀect on the steady state temperature ﬁeld, ∂ϑ/∂t ≡ 0, is the thermal conductivity λ = λ(ϑ). Assuming that λ is constant, ˙ /λ) = 0 ∇2 ϑ + (W

(2.37)

˙ is the is the diﬀerential equation for the steady temperature ﬁeld, in which W ˙ source term, namely the thermal power generated per volume. The function W can depend on either the temperature ϑ or the position coordinate. We will limit ourselves to one-dimensional heat ﬂow. The temperature changes only with respect to the position coordinate which is indicated by r, even in cartesian coordinates. The Laplace operator is diﬀerent for the three coordinate systems, cartesian, cylindrical and spherical. Combining the three cases gives from (2.37) ˙ (r, ϑ) d2 ϑ n dϑ W + + =0 2 dr r dr λ

(2.38)

122

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

as the decisive diﬀerential equation with n = 0 for linear heat ﬂow (plate), n = 1 for the cylinder and n = 2 for the sphere. Solving the ordinary diﬀerential equation (2.38) for constant power density ˙ =W ˙ 0 , gives the solution W ⎧ ⎫ ⎨ c0 + c1 (r − r0 ) ⎬ ˙ 0 r2 W c0 + c1 ln (r/r0 ) ϑ(r) = (2.39) − ⎩ ⎭ 2 (1 + n) λ c0 + c1 (1/r − 1/r0 ) for the three cases, plate (n = 0), cylinder (n = 1) and sphere (n = 2). Here c0 and c1 are constants, which have to be adjusted to the boundary conditions. As an example we will look at the simple case of heat transfer to a ﬂuid with a temperature of ϑ = ϑF taking place at the surface r = ±R. We then have dϑ −λ = α [ϑ(R) − ϑF ] (2.40) dr r=R

and due to symmetry

dϑ dr

=0 .

(2.41)

r=0

The condition (2.41) requires that c1 = 0. Then from (2.40) the constant c0 can be found, so that the solution to the boundary value problem is ˙ 0 R2 r2 W 2λ 1− 2 + . ϑ(r) = ϑF + 2λ (1 + n) R αR With the dimensionless temperature ϑ+ :=

ϑ − ϑF , ˙ 0 R2 /λ W

(2.42)

the dimensionless distance r+ = r/R

(2.43)

from the central plane or point and with the Biot number

we obtain

Bi := αR/λ

(2.44)

1 2 +2 ϑ = 1−r + . 2 (1 + n) Bi

(2.45)

+

In the bodies a parabolic temperature proﬁle exists, with the highest temperature at r+ = 0, Fig. 2.6. If the heat ﬂux q˙W at the surface (r = R) of the three bodies is given instead ˙ 0 , then from the energy balance, of the power density W ˙ 0 V = q˙W A W

2.2 Steady-state heat conduction

123

Fig. 2.6: Dimensionless temperature proﬁle ϑ+ according to (2.45) in a plate (n = 0), a cylinder (n = 1) and a sphere (n = 2) for Bi = αR/λ = 4.0

with V as the volume and A as the surface area, we obtain the simple relationship ˙0 R . ˙0V =W q˙W = W A 1+n

(2.46)

Equation (2.45) for the temperature proﬁle then has a form independent of the shape of the body: q˙W R 2 +2 ϑ(r) = ϑF + 1−r + . (2.47) 2λ Bi The considerations above can also be applied to the case of temperature dependent thermal ˙ 0 and the shape of the body are given, the heat ﬂux q˙W at the conductivity λ = λ(ϑ). When W wall (r = R) has to be calculated according to (2.46). The surface temperature ϑW is obtained from ϑW = ϑF + q˙W /α . According to section 2.1.4 we introduce the transformed temperature Θ = ΘW +

1 λ(ϑW )

ϑ λ(ϑ) dϑ

(2.48)

ϑW

to account for the variations in λ. From (2.27) the following diﬀerential equation for Θ is obtained ˙0 d2 Θ n dΘ W + + =0 , 2 dr r dr λ (ϑW ) whose form agrees with (2.38). This is solved under the boundary conditions r=0 : r = R:

dΘ/ dr = 0 , Θ = ΘW

(corresponding to ϑ = ϑW ) .

The solution is the parabola Θ − ΘW =

˙ 0 R2 W q˙W R 2 2 1 − (r/R) = 1 − (r/R) . 2(1 + n)λ(ϑW ) 2λ(ϑW )

(2.49)

For the calculation of the highest temperature ϑmax in the centre of the body, with r = 0 we obtain ˙ 0 R2 W q˙W R Θmax − ΘW = = 2(1 + n)λ(ϑW ) 2λ(ϑW )

124

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

and then with (2.48) for ϑmax the equation ϑmax

λ(ϑ) dϑ = λ (ϑW ) (Θmax − ΘW ) = ϑW

˙ 0 R2 W . 2 (1 + n)

(2.50)

˙ =W ˙ 0 = const and considered heat development M. Jakob [2.2] dropped the presumption that W rising or falling linearly with the temperature. The ﬁrst case occurs during the heating of a metallic electrical conductor whose electrical resistance increases with temperature. Example 2.1: A cylindrical fuel rod of radius r = 0.011 m is made of uranium diox˙ 0 = 1.80 · ide (UO2 ). At a certain cross section in the element the power density is W 105 kW/m3 ; the surface temperature has a value of ϑW = 340 ◦ C. The maximum temperature ϑmax in the centre of the element is to be calculated. The thermal conductivity of UO2 , according to J. H¨ ochel [2.3], is given by 3540 K λ(T ) = + 0.0747 W/K m T + 57 K

T 1000 K

3 ,

which is valid in the region 300 K < T < 3073 K. The maximum (thermodynamic) temperature Tmax is obtained from (2.50) with n = 1 and ϑ = T: Tmax ˙ 0 R2 W λ(T ) dT = = 5445 W/m . 4 TW

With the surface temperature TW = ϑW + 273 K = 613 K this yields

Tmax

λ(T ) dT = TW

Tmax + 57 K 3540 ln + 18.675 670 K

Tmax 1000 K

4

− 0.1412

W . m

From which the transcendental equation ln

Tmax + 57 K = 1.5381 − 0.005275 670 K

Tmax 1000 K

4

− 0.1412

is obtained, with the solution Tmax = 2491 K, and correspondingly ϑmax = 2281 ◦ C. This temperature lies well below the temperature at which UO2 melts, which is around 2800 ◦ C.

2.2.2

Longitudinal heat conduction in a rod

When a rod shaped object, for example a bolt or a pillar, is heated at one end heat ﬂows along the axial direction and is transferred to the environment through the outer surface of the object. The heat release from ﬁns is a similar heat conduction problem, which we will look at in the next section. Finally there are a number of measuring procedures for the determination of the thermal conductivity which are based on the comparison of temperature drops in rods made of diﬀerent materials, see [2.2].

2.2 Steady-state heat conduction

125

Fig. 2.7: Temperature proﬁle in a rod of constant cross sectional area Aq

We will consider a rod of length L with constant cross sectional area Aq and constant circumference U . One end of the rod is kept at constant temperature ϑ0 by the input of heat. Heat ﬂows along the direction of the rod axis, and will be transferred to the surroundings via the outer surface of the rod, Fig. 2.7. The cross sectional area of the rod is so small that the temperature across the whole cross section can be assumed to be constant, it only changes in the x-coordinate direction. In a rod element with volume ΔV = Aq Δx, the heat ﬂow through the outer surface of the rod released to the surroundings which have a constant temperature ϑS is ΔQ˙ = α ϑ(x + εΔx) − ϑS U Δx , 0 ≤ ε ≤ 1 . This release of heat has the same eﬀect as a heat sink in the rod material with the power density ˙ ˙ = − lim ΔQ = − αU ϑ(x) − ϑS . W Δx→0 ΔV Aq Putting this into the diﬀerential equation (2.38) for linear heat ﬂow with a heat source (n = 0) we obtain, with x instead of r d2 ϑ αU − (ϑ − ϑS ) = 0 2 dx λAq

(2.51)

as the diﬀerential equation which determines the temperature proﬁle along the rod. Assuming a constant heat transfer coeﬃcient α and putting as an abbreviation m2 = αU/λAq , gives the general solution of (2.51) as ϑ(x) = ϑS + c1 exp(−mx) + c2 exp(mx) = ϑS + C1 cosh(mx) + C2 sinh(mx) .

(2.52)

126

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

The constants of integration c1 , c2 , C1 and C2 are determined from the boundary conditions. At the left hand end (x = 0) of the rod the temperature is always assumed to be ϑ = ϑ0 , whilst at the other end (x = L) diﬀerent boundary conditions are considered. The condition for x = 0

ϑ = ϑ0

suggest that the dimensionless temperature ϑ+ :=

ϑ − ϑS ϑ0 − ϑS

(2.53)

should be used. We then have 0 ≤ ϑ+ ≤ 1. We will now consider a rod which stretches into the surroundings Fig. 2.7, and releases heat through its end surface (x = L). Here dϑ Q˙ L = −λAq = αLAq (ϑ − ϑS ) dx

for x = L

(2.54)

is valid. The heat transfer coeﬃcient αL at the end surface does not have to be the same as α at the outer surface of the rod. After some calculations the temperature proﬁle in the rod is found to be ϑ+ (x) =

cosh[m(L − x)] + (αL /mλ) sinh[m(L − x)] . cosh[mL] + (αL /mλ) sinh[mL]

(2.55)

The heat ﬂow Q˙ released to the environment is equal to the heat ﬂow through the rod cross section at x = 0: dϑ . Q˙ = Q˙ 0 = −λAq dx x=0 By diﬀerentiating (2.55) we obtain Q˙ 0 =

αλAq U (ϑ0 − ϑS )

tanh(mL) + (αL /mλ) . 1 + (αL /mλ) tanh(mL)

(2.56)

If αL = α then

αL α αAq = = . mλ mλ λU A notable simpliﬁcation of the equations is obtained when αL = 0. This is valid if the end of the rod is insulated or when the heat release through the small cross sectional area Aq can be neglected. Then for the temperature proﬁle, we get ϑ+ (x) =

cosh[m(L − x)] . cosh(mL)

(2.57)

2.2 Steady-state heat conduction

127

The temperature at the free end falls to ϑ+ (L) =

ϑL − ϑ S 1 . = ϑ0 − ϑS cosh(mL)

The heat released is yielded from (2.56) to be Q˙ 0 = αU λAq (ϑ0 − ϑS ) tanh(mL) .

(2.58)

(2.59)

The functions (cosh mL)−1 and tanh mL are represented in Fig. 2.8. If the simple equations (2.57) to (2.59) are also to be used for αL = 0, then the rod of length L, with heat release at x = L has to be imaginarily replaced by a rod of length L + ΔL which is insulated at x = L + ΔL. The extra length ΔL is determined such, that the heat ﬂow Q˙ L released via the end surface is now released via the additional circumferential area U ΔL. For small values of ΔL it is approximately valid that Q˙ L = αL Aq (ϑL − ϑS ) = αU ΔL (ϑL − ϑS ) . From which the corrected length LC of the replacement rod is obtained as LC = L + ΔL = L +

α L Aq . α U

(2.60)

This value is to be used in place of L in equations (2.57) to (2.59). We will now look at the case where the end of the rod x = L has a given temperature ϑL , Fig. 2.9. After several calculations the temperature proﬁle is found to be ϑ+ (x) =

sinh[m(L − x)] sinh(mx) + ϑ+ (L) . sinh(mL) sinh(mL)

(2.61)

In order to calculate the heat released by the rod between x = 0 and x = L, the heat ﬂow in the x-direction through the two cross sections x = 0 and x = L has to be determined. For any cross section we obtain dϑ λAq m (ϑ0 − ϑS ) ˙ Q(x) = −λAq = cosh[m(L − x)] − ϑ+ (L) cosh(mx) . dx sinh(mL)

Fig. 2.8: Characteristic functions for calculation of the overtemperature at the free end of the rod according to (2.58) and of the heat ﬂow released according to (2.59)

128

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Fig. 2.9: Temperature proﬁle for a rod, whose ends are maintained at the given temperatures ϑ0 and ϑL . a at x = L heat ﬂows out (Q˙ L > 0), b at x = L heat ﬂows in (Q˙ L < 0) From which we obtain, with m according to (2.52) Q˙ 0 = and Q˙ L =

(ϑ0 − ϑS ) αλAq U cosh(mL) − ϑ+ (L) sinh(mL)

(ϑ0 − ϑS ) αλAq U 1 − ϑ+ (L) cosh(mL) . sinh(mL)

The heat released between the two ends via the outer surface is then Q˙ = Q˙ 0 − Q˙ L =

cosh(mL) − 1 αλAq U (ϑ0 − ϑS ) 1 + ϑ+ (L) . sinh(mL)

(2.62)

Example 2.2: A cylindrical steel bolt (λ = 52.5 W/K m) with diameter d = 0.060 m and length L = 0.200 m protrudes from a plate, which has a temperature of ϑ0 = 60.0 ◦ C. Heat is transferred to the air at temperature ϑS = 12.5 ◦ C, via the outer surface and the free end of the bolt. The heat transfer coeﬃcient for the two surfaces is α = 8.0 W/m2 K. The heat ﬂow, Q˙ 0 , transferred to the air, and the temperature ϑL of the free end shall be calculated. For the heat ﬂow from (2.56) with U = πd and Aq = πd2 /4, we obtain π √ tanh (mL) + (α/mλ) Q˙ 0 = d αλd (ϑ0 − ϑS ) . 2 1 + (α/mλ) tanh (mL) Thereby according to (2.52)

α L = 0.6375 mL = 2 λd

and 1 α = mλ 2

αd = 0.0478 . λ

This gives Q˙ 0 = 13.3 W. The temperature of the free bolt end is yielded from (2.55) with x = L to be 1 ϑ+ = = 0.8047 cosh(mL) + (α/mL) sinh(mL) which produces ◦ ϑL = ϑS + (ϑ0 − ϑS ) ϑ+ L = 50.7 C .

2.2 Steady-state heat conduction

129

If the heat released via the free end of the bolt is neglected the value for the heat ﬂow Q˙ 0 = 12.7 W obtained from (2.59) is too low. The temperature ϑL is found to have the larger value ϑL = 51.8 ◦ C. Using the corrected bolt length LC = L +

d = 0.215 m 4

according to (2.60) we ﬁnd that the values for Q˙0 from (2.59) and ϑL from (2.57) agree with the exact values to three signiﬁcant ﬁgures.

2.2.3

The temperature distribution in ﬁns and pins

As already shown in section 1.2.3, heat transfer between two ﬂuids can be improved if the surface area available for heat transfer, on the side with the ﬂuid which has the lower heat transfer coeﬃcient, is increased by the addition of ﬁns or pins. However this enlargement of the area is only partly eﬀective, due to the existence of a temperature gradient in the ﬁns without which heat could not be conducted from the ﬁn base. Therefore the average overtemperature decisive for the heat transfer to the ﬂuid is smaller than the overtemperature at the ﬁn base. In order to describe this eﬀect quantitatively, the ﬁn eﬃciency was introduced in section 1.2.3. Its calculation is only possible if the temperature distribution in the ﬁn is known, which we will cover in the following. Results for the ﬁn eﬃciencies for diﬀerent ﬁn and pin shapes are given in the next section. In order to calculate the temperature distribution some limiting assumptions have to be made: 1. The ﬁn (or pin) is so thin that the temperature only changes in the direction from ﬁn base to ﬁn tip. 2. The ﬁn material is homogeneous with constant thermal conductivity λf . 3. The heat transfer at the ﬁn surface will be described by a constant heat transfer coeﬃcient αf . 4. The temperature ϑS of the ﬂuid surrounding the ﬁn is constant. 5. The heat ﬂow at the tip of the ﬁn can be neglected in comparison to that from its sides. These assumptions are generally true with the exception of the constant αf over the surface of the ﬁn. The inﬂuence of a varying heat transfer coeﬃcient has been investigated by S.-Y. Chen and G.L. Zyskowski [2.4], L.S. Han and S.G. Lefkowitz ¨ [2.5] and also H.C. Unal [2.6]. Under the assumptions given above, the temperature distribution in ﬁns can be described by a second order diﬀerential equation, which we will now derive. We cut a volume element, from any ﬁn or pin as shown in Fig. 2.10, which has a thickness of Δx. The energy balance for this element is ˙ ˙ + Δx) + ΔQ˙ S , (2.63) Q(x) = Q(x because the heat ﬂowing, by conduction, into the element at point x, has to deliver the heat conducted further to x + Δx and the heat ﬂow ΔQ˙ S , which is transferred via the surface ΔAf

130

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

of the element to the ﬂuid surrounding it which has the temperature ϑS . Introducing the overtemperature as (2.64) Θ(x) = ϑ(x) − ϑS and taking ΔAf as the surface area through which heat is released from the ﬁn element, we obtain the following expression for ΔQ˙ S ΔQ˙ S = αf ΔAf Θ(x + εΔx)

,

0≤ε≤1 .

Fig. 2.10: Energy balance for a volume element of thickness Δx and surface area ΔAf of any shape of ﬁn or pin with a cross sectional area Aq (x) According to Fourier’s law, the heat ﬂow through the cross sectional area Aq (x) dΘ ˙ Q(x) = −λf Aq (x) dx

(2.65)

is transported by conduction. From this we obtain (Taylor series at point x) ˙ + Δx) = Q(x =

dQ˙ ˙ Q(x) + Δx + O(Δx2 ) dx d dΘ ˙ Q(x) − λf Aq (x) Δx + O(Δx2 ) , dx dx

where O(Δx2 ) indicates that the rest of the terms is of the order of Δx2 . Putting these relationships for the three heat ﬂows into the balance equation (2.63) gives d dΘ 0 = −λf Aq (x) Δx + O(Δx2 ) + αf ΔAf Θ(x + εΔx) . dx dx Division by Δx, yields for the limit Δx → 0 d dΘ αf dAf Θ=0 Aq (x) − dx dx λf dx

(2.66)

as the desired diﬀerential equation for the overtemperature Θ(x). This diﬀerential equation covers all forms of extended surfaces, as long as the aforementioned assumptions are met. The diﬀerent ﬁn or pin shapes are expressed by the terms Aq = Aq (x) for the cross sectional area and Af = Af (x) for the ﬁn surface area over which the heat is released.

2.2 Steady-state heat conduction

131

Fig. 2.12: Annular ﬁn on a tube (outer radius r0 ) with proﬁle function y = y(r)

Fig. 2.11: Straight ﬁn of width b (perpendicular to drawing plane) with any proﬁle function y = y(x)

So for a straight ﬁn of width b perpendicular to the drawing plane in Fig. 2.11, with a proﬁle function y = y(x) we obtain the following for the two areas Aq (x) = 2y(x)b

and

Af (x) = 2bx .

The narrow sides of the ﬁn are not considered in Af . In addition to this the diﬀerence between Af and its projection on the plane formed by the ﬁn width b and the x-axis will also be neglected. A thin ﬁn is presumed. This leads to the diﬀerential equation d2 Θ 1 dy dΘ αf + − Θ=0 . dx2 y dx dx λf y

(2.67)

This has to be solved for a given ﬁn proﬁle y = y(x) under consideration of the boundary conditions at the ﬁn base, (2.68) Θ = Θ0 = ϑ0 − ϑS for x = 0 , and the condition

dΘ = 0 for x = h . (2.69) dx This corresponds to the ﬁfth assumption, the neglection of the heat released at the tip of the ﬁn. For thin annular ﬁns, as in Fig. 2.12, with r as the radial coordinate we obtain Aq (r) = 4πry(r) and

Af (r) = 2π(r2 − r02 ) ,

where y = y(r) describes the ﬁn proﬁle. The diﬀerential equation for annular ﬁns is found from (2.66) to be d2 Θ y dy dΘ αf y + Θ=0 . (2.70) + − dr 2 r dr dr λf The solution has to fulﬁll the boundary conditions Θ = Θ0 = ϑ0 − ϑS

for r = r0

at the ﬁn base and dΘ/dr = 0

for r = r0 + h

at the tip of the ﬁn. Solutions to these diﬀerential equations, (2.67) and (2.70), for diﬀerent proﬁle functions y = y(x) and y = y(r) were ﬁrst given by D.R. Harper and W.B. Brown [2.7] in 1922 and also by E. Schmidt [2.8] in 1926 respectively. In 1945 an extensive investigation of all proﬁles which lead to diﬀerential equations with solutions that are generalised Bessel functions was carried out by K.A. Gardner [2.9]. The diﬀerential equation derived from equation (2.66) for cone-shaped pins with various proﬁles was ﬁrst given and then solved by R. Focke [2.10] in 1942. A summary of the temperature distributions in various elements of extended heat transfer surfaces can be found in the book by D.Q. Kern and A.D. Kraus [2.11].

132

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

In the following we will deal with a straight ﬁn with a rectangular proﬁle. Its thickness will be indicated by δf , so that the proﬁle function y(x) = δf /2 in Fig. 2.11 is valid. From (2.67) follows the simple diﬀerential equation d2 Θ 2αf − Θ=0 . 2 dx λf δf It has the same form as equation (2.51) from section 2.2.2, which is valid for heat conduction in the axial direction of a rod. Using the abbreviation 2αf (2.71) m= λf δf we obtain the solution already known from section 2.2.2 Θ = Θ0

cosh [m(h − x)] , cosh(mh)

(2.72)

which fulﬁlls the boundary conditions (2.68) and (2.69). If the heat release at the tip of the ﬁn, neglected in (2.69), is to be considered, a corrected ﬁn height, corresponding to (2.60), can be introduced, by which h will be replaced by hC = h + Δh = h + δf /2. Eq. (2.72) is also valid for a pin with constant cross sectional area Aq . This only requires that δf = Aq /2U with U as the circumference of the cross sectional area be put into (2.71).

Fig. 2.13: Temperature distribution in a straight ﬁn with a rectangular proﬁle (ﬁn thickness δf ) as a function of x/h with mh as a parameter according to (2.72)

Fig. 2.13 shows the temperature proﬁle as a function of the dimensionless coordinate x/h for diﬀerent values of the parameter mh, in which the dimensions of the ﬁn, its thermal conductivity and the heat transfer coeﬃcient are combined. Values in the region 0.7 < mh < 2 should be chosen for practical applications. In

2.2 Steady-state heat conduction

133

long ﬁns with mh > 2 the temperature quickly falls, and a signiﬁcant portion of the ﬁn transfers only a small amount of heat due to a too small overtemperature. Values of mh < 0.7 indicate that by lengthening the ﬁn, a signiﬁcantly larger heat ﬂow could have been transferred. An optimal value for mh can be found under the condition that the heat ﬂow Q˙ f released from the ﬁn should be as large as possible, provided that the material usage, i.e. the volume of the ﬁn is constant. We obtain Q˙ f as the heat ﬂow conducted through the ﬁn base (x = 0) to be dΘ ˙ . (2.73) Qf = −λf b δf dx x=0 Out of (2.72) comes Q˙ f =

2αf λf δf b Θ0 tanh (mh) .

(2.74)

With the ﬁn volume Vf = δf hb we get

Θ0 Q˙ f = 2αf λf Vf b √ tanh h

2αf b 3/2 h λf Vf

.

In general, the ﬁn width b is set by the dimensions of the apparatus which is to be cooled. Q˙ f therefore depends on h and the condition dQ˙ f /dh = 0 leads to the equation

3mh tanh(mh) = = 3mh 1 − tanh2(mh) 2 cosh (mh) with the solution 2αf h = 1.4192 . mh = λf δf The chosen height h of the ﬁn using this condition gives the maximum heat ﬂow for a set ﬁn volume Vf . A similar calculation for annular ﬁns with diﬀerent proﬁle functions is available in A. Ullmann and H. Kalman [2.12]. E. Schmidt [2.8] determined the ﬁn shape, which for a speciﬁc thermal power, required the least material. The proﬁle of these ﬁns is a parabola, with its vertex at the tip of the ﬁn. These types of pointed ﬁns are diﬃcult to produce, which is why ﬁns used in practice have either rectangular, trapezoidal or triangular cross sections.

2.2.4

Fin eﬃciency

The ﬁn eﬃciency ηf :=

Q˙ f ϑf − ϑS Θf = = ˙ ϑ − ϑ Θ Qf0 0 S 0

(2.75)

134

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

was introduced in section 1.2.3, as the ratio of the actual heat ﬂow Q˙ f released by the ﬁn to the heat ﬂow Q˙ f0 = αf Af (ϑ0 − ϑS ) = αf Af Θ0 , which would be released, if the temperature throughout the ﬁn was the same as at its base ϑ0 , rather than the lower mean temperature ϑf . Here ϑS is the ﬂuid temperature which was indicated by ϑ2 in section 1.2.3. The heat ﬂow released ˙ from the ﬁn agrees with the heat ﬂow Q(x = 0), which is conducted at the ﬁn base into the ﬁn itself: ˙ = 0) = −λf Aq0 (dΘ/dx) Q˙ f = Q(x x=0 .

(2.76)

Here Aq0 is the cross sectional area at the ﬁn base. The heat ﬂow Q˙ f for a straight ﬁn with a rectangular proﬁle was calculated in the last section. Using (2.74) and Aq0 = b δf it follows from (2.76) that tanh(mh) . (2.77) mh The eﬃciency of a straight rectangular ﬁn only depends on the dimensionless group 2αf h (2.78) mh = λf δf Fig. 2.14 shows ηf according to (2.77). For the optimal value determined in 2.2.3 of mh = 1.4192 for the ﬁn with the largest heat release at a given volume the eﬃciency is ηf = 0.627. ηf =

Fig. 2.14: Eﬃciency ηf of a straight ﬁn with a rectangular proﬁle according to (2.77) and with a triangular proﬁle according to (2.79) as a function of mh from (2.78)

The eﬃciencies of other ﬁn shapes can be found in the same manner from the temperature distribution in the ﬁns. Fig. 2.14 shows ηf as a function of mh for a

2.2 Steady-state heat conduction

135

straight ﬁn with a triangular proﬁle. In this case δf is the thickness of the ﬁn at its base. The plot of the eﬃciency ηf is similar to the plot of the ﬁn eﬃciency for a straight rectangular ﬁn. It is therefore possible to replace the expression for ηf containing Bessel functions with a similar function to that in equation (2.77): ηf =

tanh (ϕmh) . ϕmh

(2.79)

The correction factor ϕ is given by ϕ = 0.99101 + 0.31484

tanh (0.74485mh) , mh

(2.80)

from which we obtain a reproduction of the exact result, which for values of mh < 5 has an accuracy better than 0.05%. For the frequently used annular ﬁns of constant thickness δf , y(r) = δf /2 has to be put into (2.70) for the proﬁle function. The ﬁn eﬃciency ηf is dependent on two dimensionless groups: mh according to (2.78) and the radius ratio (r0 +h)/r0 = 1+ h/r0 , cf. Fig. 2.12. This yields a complicated expression containing modiﬁed Bessel functions. F. Brandt [2.13] found the rather accurate approximation equation tanh(mh) 2r0 tanh(mh) [tanh(mh)]p (2.81) 1+ ηf = −C 2r0 + h mh 2mr0 (mr0 )n with C = 0.071882, p = 3.7482, n = 1.4810. It has a maximum error of 0.6% for all values of mh and for mr0 ≥ 0.2. A more simple approximation equation was found by Th.E. Schmidt [2.14]: ηf =

tanh (mhϕ) mhϕ

(2.82)

with ϕ = 1 + 0.35 ln (1 + h/r0 ) .

(2.82a)

For ηf > 0.5 it deviates by no more than ±1% from the exact values. Frequently square, rectangular or hexagonal disk ﬁns are attached to tubes, whereby several tubes can also be joined together by the use of sheets of ﬁns through which the tubes pass, Fig. 2.15. In these ﬁns the temperature does not only depend on one coordinate, but two-dimensional temperature ﬁelds must be reckoned with. As a ﬁrst approach, the eﬃciency ηf of these disk ﬁns can be calculated from (2.81) or (2.82) for an annular ﬁn with the same surface area. Then for a rectangular ﬁn as in Fig. 2.15 we get √ (2.83) h = s1 s2 /π − r0 = 0.564 s1 s2 − r0 and for the hexagonal ﬁn with side length s √ 3 3 h= s − r0 = 1.211s − r0 2π

(2.84)

to put into the equations. Somewhat more accurate values have been found by Th.E. Schmidt [2.14] with h = 0.64 s2 (s1 − 0.2s2 ) − r0 (2.85)

136

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Fig. 2.15: Disk ﬁns. a rectangular disks on a tube, b tube arrangement with disk ﬁns (rectangular and hexagonal) for the rectangular ﬁn with s1 taken as the larger side of the rectangle. E.M. Sparrow and S.H. Lin [2.15] provided analytical approximations for square (s1 = s2 ) ﬁns and for the hexagonal shaped ﬁns, which with more extensive calculations produce any exact value for ηf . After that the simple equations (2.83) with s1 = s2 = s are suﬃciently exact, as long as h/r0 ≥ 0.5. H.D. Baehr and F. Schubert [2.16] have experimentally determined the eﬃciency of a square disk ﬁn with an electrical analogy method and have conﬁrmed that the approximation equations (2.82) and (2.85) are in the main correct.

2.2.5

Geometric multi-dimensional heat ﬂow

Plane and spatial steady temperature ﬁelds, which appear in geometric multidimensional heat ﬂow, are signiﬁcantly more diﬃcult to calculate than the cases considered up until now, in which ϑ only changed in one coordinate direction. Solutions to the Laplace equation for plane temperature ﬁelds without heat sources ∇2 ϑ =

∂ 2 ϑ ∂ 2ϑ + =0 , ∂x2 ∂y2

(2.86)

can be obtained by applying diﬀerent mathematical methods. The product or separation formula ϑ(x, y) = f1 (x) · f2 (y) yields two easy to solve ordinary diﬀerential equations from (2.86). The fulﬁllment of the boundary conditions is only possible in an easy way if the temperature ﬁeld is sought in a rectangle with edges which run parallel with the x and y directions respectively. Examples of this method can be found in the book by S. Kaka¸c and Y. Yener [2.17]. A further solution method is conformal mapping. Its application has been described by H.S. Carslaw and J.C. Jaeger [2.1], as well as by U. Grigull and H. Sandner [2.18]. Regions with complex geometry can also be treated using this method. However, simple solutions are only obtained when as boundary conditions constant temperatures or adiabatic edges are prescribed. In general a heat

2.2 Steady-state heat conduction

137

transfer condition can only be considered approximately. As an example for this an investigation by K. Elgeti [2.19] should be mentioned, where he calculated the heat released from a pipe embedded in a wall. Finally the method of superposition of heat sources and sinks should be mentioned. This method also allows complex temperature ﬁelds between isothermally bounded bodies to be calculated. It corresponds to the singularity method which is used in ﬂuid mechanics for calculating the potential ﬂows around bodies with any given contour, cf. for example [2.20]. An application of this method will be shown in the next section. 2.2.5.1

Superposition of heat sources and heat sinks

In section 1.1.2 we calculated the temperature distribution ϑ = ϑ(r) in a hollow cylinder of length L. The heat ﬂow in the radial direction is Q˙ = 2πLλ (ϑ − ϑ0 ) / ln (r0 /r) , where ϑ is the temperature at distance r from the cylinder axis and ϑ0 is the temperature at the radius r0 . The heat ﬂow Q˙ can be perceived as the strength of a linear heat source at r = 0, which runs parallel to the z-axis. This generates the temperature ﬁeld which is only dependent on r, ϑ(r) = ϑ0 +

Q˙ ln (r0 /r) , 2πLλ

(2.87)

with temperatures which approach inﬁnity for r → 0.

Fig. 2.16: Superposition of a linear heat source at point Q and a linear heat sink at point S

Such a linear or cylindrical heat source may lie on the x-axis at point Q at ˙ is located a distance h from the origin, Fig. 2.16. A heat sink of strength (−Q) at point S at a distance (−h) from the origin. We wish to determine the plane temperature ﬁeld which is generated by the superposition of the source and the sink in the thermally conductive material. At any particular point P in Fig. 2.16, the temperature is ϑ = ϑ0Q +

r0 r0 Q˙ Q˙ ln ln + ϑ0S − , 2πLλ rQ 2πLλ rS

138

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

from which, with ϑ0 = ϑ0Q + ϑ0S ϑ = ϑ0 +

Q˙ rS ln 2πLλ rQ

(2.88)

is obtained. Here rQ and rS represent the distance of point P from the source or the sink respectively. An isotherm ϑ = const is, according to this equation, a line on which the distance ratio k = rS /rQ (2.89) has a constant value. At all points on the y-axis, we have rS = rQ , and therefore the y-axis is the isotherm with k = 1, where ϑ = ϑ0 . All points to the right of the y-axis (x > 0) have a distance ratio k > 1 and temperatures ϑ > ϑ0 . For the points where x < 0, 0 ≤ k < 1 and ϑ < ϑ0 are valid. We will now show that all isotherms ϑ = ϑ0 form a set of circles with centres which all lie on the x-axis. According to Fig. 2.16 k2 = is valid and from that follows x−

rS2 (x + h)2 + y 2 2 = (x − h)2 + y 2 , rQ

k2 + 1 h k2 − 1

2 + y2 =

4k2 h2 . (k 2 − 1)2

(2.90)

This is the equation for a circle with radius R=

2k h , k2 − 1

(2.91)

whose centre M lies on the x-axis and at a distance m=

k2 + 1 h k2 − 1

(2.92)

from the origin. The isotherms ϑ > ϑ0 lie to the right of the y-axis, because k > 1. As the temperature rises (increasing k) the circle radii get smaller, and the centre of the circle moves closer to the source point Q, Fig. 2.17. Isotherms with ϑ < ϑ0 are circles which lie to the left of the y-axis. With falling temperatures the circles are drawn closer around sink S. From (2.91) and (2.92) the following is obtained by squaring: h2 = m2 − R 2 . By forming the ratio m/R, a quadratic equation for k with the solutions m 2 m k= −1 ± R R

(2.93)

(2.94)

results. The positive root delivers distance ratios k > 1, and is therefore to be applied to circles to the right of the y-axis. The other root yields values of k < 1, which correspond to circles to the left of the y-axis. The isotherms given by (2.88), (2.89) and (2.90) and represented in Fig. 2.17 allow the steady-state heat conduction in the medium between two isothermal circles, e.g. between two tubes with constant surface temperatures ϑ1 and ϑ2 to be calculated. This gives ϑ1 − ϑ2 = or Q˙ =

Q˙ (ln k1 − ln k2 ) 2πLλ

2πLλ ϑ1 − ϑ2 . (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) = ln (k1 /k2 ) Rcond

(2.95)

2.2 Steady-state heat conduction

139

Fig. 2.17: Net of isotherms from (2.88) and (2.90) for diﬀerent distance ratios k according to (2.89); Q heat source, S heat sink This is the heat ﬂow between the isotherms ϑ = ϑ1 and ϑ = ϑ2 . It is inversely proportional to the resistance to heat conduction (cf. 1.2.2) Rcond =

ln (k1 /k2 ) 2πLλ

(2.96)

which depends on the position of the two isothermal circles (tubes). Thereby three cases must be distinguished: 1. k1 > k2 > 1. Two eccentric tubes, in Fig. 2.18 a, with axes a distance e away from each other. The larger tube 2 with surface temperature ϑ2 surrounds tube 1 with ϑ1 > ϑ2 . 2. k1 > 1; k2 = 1. A tube with radius R, lying at a depth m under an isothermal plane e.g. under the earth’s surface Fig. 2.18 b. 3. k1 > 1; k2 < 1. Two tubes with radii R1 and R2 , whose axes have the separation s > R1 +R2 . They both lie in an extensive medium, Fig. 2.18 c. It is rather simple to calculate the resistance to heat conduction between a tube and an isothermal plane as shown in Fig. 2.18 b. With k2 = 1 and k1 according to (2.94) we obtain from (2.96) m m 2 1 1 Rcond = ln + arcosh (m/R) . (2.97) −1 = 2πLλ R R 2πLλ If at the plane surface heat transfer to a ﬂuid with temperature ϑ2 is to be considered, this can be approximated by calculating Rcond with the enlarged distance m∗ = m + λ/α . The actual surface at a depth λ/α is not isothermal, but shows a weak temperature maximum directly above the tube, as would be expected from a physical point of view. K. Elgeti [2.21] found an exact solution to this problem. The approximation is surprisingly accurate. Notable deviations from the exact solution only appear for αR/λ < 0.5 and only with values of m/R < 2.

140

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Fig. 2.18: Three arrangements of tubes with isothermal surfaces. a two eccentric tubes, one inside the other, b a tube and an isothermal plane, c two tubes with distance between their centres s > R1 + R2 The calculation of the conduction resistance between two eccentric tubes, as in Fig. 2.18 a, can only be carried out if both tube radii R1 and R2 and the distance between their two centres (eccentricity) e = m2 − m1 (2.98) are given. The distances m1 and m2 are expressed using these three quantities. According to (2.93) m22 − m21 = R22 − R12 (2.99) and from (2.98) it follows that (m2 − m1 )2 = e2 . From these two equations we obtain m1 =

R22 − R12 − e2 2e

and

m2 =

R22 − R12 + e2 . 2e

This gives the thermal conduction resistance as R2 − R12 − e2 1 1 R2 − R12 + e2 Rcond = (ln k1 − ln k2 ) = arcosh 2 − arcosh 2 2πLλ 2πLλ 2eR1 2eR2 or with the use of the addition theorem for inverse hyperbolic cosine functions Rcond =

1 R2 + R22 − e2 . arcosh 1 2πLλ 2R1 R2

(2.100)

In the special case of concentric circles (e = 0) the result Rcond =

1 ln (R2 /R1 ) 2πLλ

already known from 1.1.2 will be obtained. For the third case, two tubes in an extended medium as in Fig. 2.18 c, we express m1 and m2 through the tube radii R1 and R2 as well as the distance s = m1 + m2 . This gives, with (2.99) m1 =

s2 − R22 − R12 2s

and

m2 =

s2 + R22 − R12 . 2s

The resistance to heat conduction, with ⎛ ⎞ 2 m2 m2 m2 ⎝ ln k2 = ln − − 1⎠ = −arcosh R2 R2 R2

2.2 Steady-state heat conduction

is found to be Rcond =

s2 − R22 − R12 1 s2 + R22 − R12 arcosh + arcosh 2πLλ 2sR1 2sR2

141

(2.101)

and ﬁnally

1 s2 − R12 − R22 . arcosh 2πLλ 2R1 R2 If the tubes have equal radii R1 = R2 = R, we obtain from (2.101) Rcond =

Rcond =

1 s arcosh . πLλ 2R

(2.102)

(2.103)

The superposition of several heat sources and sinks allows to calculate more complex temperature ﬁelds. W. Nusselt [2.22] replaced the tubes of a radiation heating system embedded in a ceiling by linear heat sources and so calculated the temperature distribution in the ceiling.

2.2.5.2

Shape factors

˙ from one isothermal surface at temperature ϑ1 to another isotherThe heat ﬂow Q, mal surface at temperature ϑ2 , can be calculated according to the simple relationship Q˙ = (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) /Rcond if the resistance to conduction Rcond is known. Thereby Rcond is inversely proportional to the thermal conductivity λ of the material between the two isothermal surfaces. It is reasonable to deﬁne Rcond = (λS)−1

(2.104)

Q˙ = λS (ϑ1 − ϑ2 )

(2.105)

or to put and thereby introduce the shape coeﬃcient S. The shape coeﬃcient only depends on the geometrical arrangement of the two isothermal surfaces between which Q˙ is transferred by conduction. It has the dimensions of length. For bodies with two-dimensional (plane) temperature distributions, which have length L perpendicular to the plane of coordinates on which the temperature ϑ depends, a dimensionless shape coeﬃcient SL := S/L can be deﬁned. This dimensionless number is known as shape factor. Examples of these plane temperature ﬁelds were dealt with in the last section. The shape factor for a tube of radius R and length L, as in Fig. 2.18 b, lying at a depth of m under an isothermal surface is found, according to (2.97) and (2.104), to be SL =

S 2π = . L arcosh (m/R)

(2.106)

The shape factors for the tube arrangements shown in Figs. 2.18 a and 2.18 c can be found in the same manner from equations (2.100) and (2.102) respectively.

142

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

In order to calculate the shape coeﬃcient S in general, the heat ﬂow Q˙ has to be determined by integration of the local heat ﬂux q˙ = −λ

∂ϑ ∂n

on the isothermal surfaces A1 and A2 . The heat ﬂow from A1 to A2 is given by ∂ϑ ∂ϑ dA1 = λ dA2 . (2.107) Q˙ = −λ ∂n1 ∂n2 (A1 )

(A2 )

In which the surface normals n1 and n2 are directed into the conductive medium. Equation (2.105) gives the shape coeﬃcient as S=

Q˙ ∂ϑ ∂ϑ 1 1 dA1 = dA2 . =− λ (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ) ϑ1 − ϑ2 ∂n1 ϑ1 − ϑ 2 ∂n2 (A1 )

(2.108)

(A2 )

This relationship enables S to be calculated from the known temperature ﬁeld. E. Hahne and U. Grigull [2.23] have compiled shape coeﬃcients and shape factors for a large number of diﬀerent geometrical arrangements and organised them systematically. A similar, extensive collection of shape factors for 45 diﬀerent geometries is available in the VDI-HeatAtlas [2.24]. In the deﬁnition of the shape coeﬃcient in (2.105) and its calculation according to (2.107) and (2.108), constant thermal conductivity λ was presumed. The temperature dependence of λ = λ(ϑ) is accounted for by the transformed temperature Θ from (2.26), which was introduced in section 2.1.4. It is found that a shape coeﬃcient S calculated for constant λ can be used unaltered, for cases in which λ = λ(ϑ), thereby allowing the heat ﬂow between two isothermal surfaces to be calculated. Equation (2.105) can be used for this, provided that λ is replaced by the integral mean value ϑ1 1 λm = λ(ϑ) dϑ . (2.109) ϑ1 − ϑ2 ϑ2

This result is a generalisation of equations (1.8) to (1.11) exhibited in section 1.1.2 for geometric one-dimensional heat conduction between the two isothermal surfaces of ﬂat and curved walls.

2.3

Transient heat conduction

Time dependent or transient temperature ﬁelds appear when the thermal conditions at the boundaries of the body change. If, for example, a body that initially has a constant temperature is placed in an environment at a diﬀerent temperature then heat will ﬂow over the surface of the body and its temperature will change over time. At the end of this time dependent process a new steady-state temperature distribution will develop.

2.3 Transient heat conduction

143

In the following sections we will discuss simple solutions, which are also important for practical applications, of the transient heat conduction equation. The problems in the foreground of our considerations will be those where the temperature ﬁeld depends on time and only one geometrical coordinate. We will discuss the most important mathematical methods for the solution of the equation. The solution of transient heat conduction problems using numerical methods will be dealt with in section 2.4.

2.3.1

Solution methods

The solution of a transient heat conduction problem can be found in three diﬀerent ways: 1. by a closed solution of the heat conduction equation, fulﬁlling all the boundary conditions, 2. by a numerical solution of the diﬀerential equation (with boundary conditions) using either a ﬁnite diﬀerence or ﬁnite element method. 3. by an experimental method implementing an analogy process. In order to ﬁnd a closed solution by mathematical functions the material properties must be assumed to be temperature independent, which according to section 2.1.2 leads to the partial diﬀerential equation ˙ ∂ϑ W = a∇2ϑ + . (2.110) ∂t c So that a linear diﬀerential equation is produced, the problem is limited to either ˙ ≡ 0), or the power density W ˙ is conduction without internal heat sources (W presupposed to be independent of or only linearly dependent on ϑ. In addition the boundary conditions must also be linear, which for the heat transfer condition (2.23) requires a constant or time dependent, but non-temperature dependent heat transfer coeﬃcient α. The linear initial and boundary condition problems outlined here were solved for numerous cases in the 19th and 20th centuries. The classical solution methods of separating the variables, the superimposing of heat sources and sinks and Green’s theorem were all used. In more recent times the Laplace transformation has become the more important solution method for transient heat conduction problems. The classical separation of the variables theory will be applied in sections 2.3.4 to 2.3.6. As the Laplace transformation is not very well known among engineers, a short introduction will be made in the following section. In section 2.3.3 we will show the applications of the Laplace transformation to problems which can easily be solved using this method. A more extensive exposition of the mathematical solution methods and a whole host of results can be found in the standard work by H.S. Carslaw and J.C. Jaeger [2.1]. The numerical solution of a transient heat conduction problem is of particular importance when temperature dependent material properties or bodies with

144

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

irregular shapes or complex boundary conditions, for example a temperature dependent α, are present. In these cases a numerical solution is generally the only choice to solve the problem. The application possibilities for numerical solutions have considerably increased with the introduction of computers. These numerical methods will be discussed in section 2.4. Experimental analogy procedures are based on the fact that diﬀerent transient transport processes, in particular electrical conduction, lead to partial diﬀerential equations which have the same form as the heat conduction equation. We speak of analogous processes and use a model of such a process which is analogous to heat conduction, in order to transfer the results gained from the model to the thermal conduction process. A short description of this type of analogy model can be found in U. Grigull and H. Sandner [2.18]. As a result of the extensive progress in computer technology, this method has very little practical importance today and for this reason we will not look any further into analogy methods.

2.3.2

The Laplace transformation

The Laplace transformation has proved an eﬀective tool for the solution of the linear heat conduction equation (2.110) with linear boundary conditions. It follows a prescribed solution path and makes it possible to obtain special solutions, for example for small times or at a certain position in the thermally conductive body, without having to determine the complete time and spatial dependence of its temperature ﬁeld. An introductory illustration of the Laplace transformation and its application to heat conduction problems has been given by H.D. Baehr [2.25]. An extensive representation is oﬀered in the book by H. Tautz [2.26]. The Laplace transformation has a special importance for one-dimensional heat ﬂow, as in this case the solution of the partial diﬀerential equation leads back to the solution of a linear ordinary diﬀerential equation. In the following introduction we will limit ourselves to this case. ϑ = ϑ (x, t) is the temperature distribution that has to be calculated. Multiplying ϑ with the factor e−st, in which s is a (complex) quantity with the same dimensions as frequency, and integrating the product from t = 0 to t → ∞, produces a new function ∞ u (x, s) = L {ϑ(x, t)} = ϑ(x, t) e−st dt .

(2.111)

0

This is known as the Laplace transform2 of the temperature ϑ and depends on s and x. We use the symbol L {ϑ} when we are stating theorems, while u is an abbreviation for L {ϑ} in the solution of concrete problems. Often ϑ will be called 2 In some books the Laplace parameter s is denoted by p, as in H.S. Carslaw and J.C. Jaeger [2.1] and in H. Tautz [2.26].

2.3 Transient heat conduction

145

Table 2.2: Some general relationships for the Laplace transform L {ϑ} = u

1. L {ϑ1 + ϑ2 } = L {ϑ1 } + L {ϑ2 } "

# ∂ϑ 2. L = s L {ϑ} − ϑ0 = s u − ϑ0(x) ∂t with ϑ0 (x) = lim ϑ(x, t), ( Initial temperature proﬁle) " 3. L

∂ nϑ ∂xn

" 4. L

t→+0

# =

∂ nu ∂xn #

t

ϑ(t ) dt

=

0

1 L {ϑ} s

5. If L {ϑ(t)} = u(s) and k is a positive constant, then 1 s L {ϑ(kt)} = u k k " t # " t # 6. L f1 (τ ) f2 (t − τ ) dτ = L f2(τ ) f1 (t − τ ) dτ 0

0

= L {f1(t)} · L {f2 (t)} , so-called convolution theorem, which is applied, in particular, to time dependent boundary conditions. the object function with L {ϑ} as the subfunction or transformed function. As s has the dimensions of frequency, it is said that through the Laplace transformation ϑ is transformed from the time region to the frequency region. To apply the Laplace transformation several theorems are required, which have been put together, without proofs, in Table 2.2. In addition a table of functions of ϑ with their Laplace transforms u is also needed. This correspondence table is generated by the evaluation of the deﬁning equation (2.111). So for example, we obtain for

ϑ(x, t) = f (x) e−ct

the Laplace transform u(x, s)

=

∞ f (x) e−ct e−st dt 0

e−(s+c)t = −f (x) s+c

∞ = f (x) e−(s+c)t dt

∞

0

= 0

We have therefore the general correspondence u(x, s) •−◦ ϑ(x, t)

f (x) . s+c

146

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

and in our example f (x) •−◦ f (x) e−ct , s+c where for the special case of f (x) ≡ 1 and c = 0 1 •−◦ 1 s is valid.

Further correspondences of this type, which are important for the solution of the heat conduction equation are contained in Table 2.3. More extensive tables of correspondences can be found in the literature, e.g. [2.1], [2.26] to [2.28]. In order to explain the solution process we will limit ourselves to linear heat ﬂow in the x-direction and write the heat conduction equation as ∂ 2 ϑ 1 ∂ϑ − =0 . ∂x2 a ∂t

(2.112)

Applying the Laplace transformation gives, according to Table 2.2, the ordinary diﬀerential equation d2 u s 1 − u = − ϑ0 (x) , (2.113) 2 dx a a in which ϑ0 (x) = ϑ (x, t = 0) represents the given initial temperature distribution at time t = 0. If ϑ0 (x) = 0 a homogeneous linear diﬀerential equation is produced, whose solution can immediately be formulated: $ $ s u(x, s) = c1 exp − as x + c2 exp ax (2.114) $ $ s s = C1 cosh a x + C2 sinh ax . The two integration constants c1, c2 or C1 , C2 are found by ﬁtting u to the boundary conditions, which are also subjected to a Laplace transform. If an initial condition of ϑ0 = 0 has to be accounted for, the solution given in (2.114) for the homogeneous diﬀerential equation has to be supplemented by a particular solution of the inhomogeneous equation. Once the Laplace transform u (x, s) of the temperature ϑ (x, t) which ﬁts the initial and boundary conditions has been found, the back-transformation or socalled inverse transformation must be carried out. The easiest method for this is to use a table of correspondences, for example Table 2.3, from which the desired temperature distribution can be simply read oﬀ. However frequently u (x, s) is not present in such a table. In these cases the Laplace transformation theory gives an inversion theorem which can be used to ﬁnd the required solution. The temperature distribution appears as a complex integral which can be evaluated using Cauchy’s theorem. The required temperature distribution is yielded as an inﬁnite series of exponential functions fading with time. We will not deal with the application of the inversion theorem, and so limit ourselves to cases where the

2.3 Transient heat conduction

147

Table 2.3: Table of some correspondences. u(s, x) is the Laplace transform of ϑ(t, x). The √ abbreviations p = s/a and ξ = x/2 at should be recognised.

u(s, x)

1. 2.

s

c s 1 , ν > −1 ν+1

ϑ(t, x)

c tν , Γ this is the Gamma function, see below Γ(ν + 1)

3.

1 s+c

e−ct

4.

e−px

ξ 2 √ e−ξ πt a −ξ2 e πt

5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.

e−px p e−px s e−px sp e−px s2 e−px p+h e−px p (p + h) e−px s (p + h)

erfc ξ, complementary error function , see below 2 √ √ e−ξ 2 at √ − ξ erfc ξ = 2 at ierfc ξ π

2 2 t 1 + 2ξ 2 erfc ξ − √ ξ e−ξ π √ a −ξ2 2 e − haehx+ah t erfc ξ + h at πt √ 2 aehx+ah t erfc ξ + h at √ 1 2 erfc ξ − ehx+ah t erfc ξ + h at h

Special values of the Gamma function: Γ(1) = 1 √ Γ( 12 ) = π

; Γ(n) = (n − 1)! = 1 · 2 · 3 · . . . (n − 1) , (n = 2, 3, . . .) √ 1 · 3 · 5 · . . . (2n − 1) ; Γ(n + 12 ) = π , (n = 1, 2, 3, . . .) 2n

Values for the complementary error functions erfc ξ and ierfc ξ can be found in Table 2.5 in section 2.3.3.1. A plot of these functions is shown in Fig. 2.22.

148

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

inverse transformation is possible using the correspondence tables. Applications of the inversion theorem are explained in the literature in [2.1], [2.25] and [2.26]. In addition to this method it is also possible to carry out the inverse transformation numerically using diﬀerent algorithms, see [2.29]. The solution of transient heat conduction problems using the Laplace transformation consists of three steps: 1. Transformation of the diﬀerential equation with the initial and boundary conditions into the frequency region (ϑ → u, t → s) . 2. Solution of the diﬀerential equation for the Laplace transform u considering the (transformed) boundary conditions. 3. Inverse transformation to the time region (u → ϑ, s → t) using a correspondence table (u •−◦ ϑ) or the general inversion theorem. Two advantageous properties of the Laplace transformation should be mentioned. If only the temperature change with time at a particular point in the thermally conductive body is required, rather than the temperature distribution for the whole body, then the total Laplace transform u(s, x) does not have to be backtransformed. It is suﬃcient to just set the position variable in u as constant and then back-transform the simpliﬁed function u(s) in ϑ(t). Besides this simpliﬁcation for calculating only the required part of the temperature distribution, the possibility of obtaining solutions for small values of time also exists. This can be applied to the beginning of a heat conduction process, and the results assume an especially simple form. The Laplace transform u has to be developed into a series which converges for large values of s. A term by term back-transformation using a correspondence table gives a series for ϑ which converges for small values of t. These particular features and an illustration of the solution procedure are given in the following example. Example 2.3: A ﬂat wall of thickness δ has a constant temperature ϑ0 . At time t = 0 the temperature of the surface x = δ jumps to ϑS , whilst the other surface x = 0 is adiabatic, Fig. 2.19. Heat ﬂows from the right hand surface into the wall. The temperature rises with time, whereby the temperature of the left hand surface of the wall rises at the slowest rate. The temperature increase at this point, i.e. the temperature ϑ(x = 0, t) is to be calculated.

Fig. 2.19: Heating one side of a ﬂat wall, by a sharp rise in the surface temperature at x = δ from ϑ0 to ϑS This transient heat conduction problem can be used as a model for the following real process. A ﬁre resistant wall is rapidly heated on its outer side (x = δ) as a result of a ﬁre. We are interested in the temperature rise over time of the other side of the wall at x = 0. The assumption of an adiabatic surface at x = 0 results in a faster temperature rise than would be expected in reality. This assumption therefore leaves us on the safe side.

2.3 Transient heat conduction

149

For the solution of this problem we will assume that heat only ﬂows in the x-direction and that the thermal diﬀusivity a of the wall is constant. Introducing the overtemperature Θ(x, t) := ϑ(x, t) − ϑ0 and leaving the use of dimensionless quantities until the results are presented gives us a clearer picture of the procedure. The heat conduction equation (2.112) takes the form ∂ 2 Θ 1 ∂Θ − =0 ∂x2 a ∂t with initial conditions Θ0 (x) = Θ(x, 0) = 0 . The boundary conditions are

∂Θ =0 ∂x

at

x=0

(adiabatic surface) and Θ(δ, t) = ΘS = ϑS − ϑ0

at

x=δ .

Applying the Laplace transformation leads to the ordinary diﬀerential equation which corresponds to (2.113) d2 u s − u=0 (2.115) dx2 a for the Laplace transform u = u(x, s) of the overtemperature Θ(x, t). The initial conditions have already been accounted for. Laplace transformation of the two boundary conditions yields du =0 for x = 0 (2.116) dx and ΘS u(δ, s) = for x = δ . (2.117) s The general solution of the diﬀerential equation (2.115) is u(x, s) = C1 cosh px + C2 sinh px , where the abbreviation p = s/a has been used. From the boundary condition (2.116) it follows that C2 = 0 and (2.117) gives C1 cosh pδ =

ΘS . s

The required Laplace transform is therefore u(x, s) =

ΘS cosh px . s cosh pδ

The inverse transformation can be achieved using the inversion theorem, which we do not need here, as we are only interested in the temperature at the point x = 0. For this we ﬁnd 2ΘS 2ΘS e−pδ ΘS = = . u(0, s) = s cosh pδ s (epδ + e−pδ ) s (1 + e−2pδ ) In order to carry out the inverse transformation with the aid of correspondence tables, the numerator has to be expanded into a binomial series, giving u(0, s) =

2ΘS e−pδ 1 − e−2pδ + e−4pδ − e−6pδ + · · · s

150

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

and ﬁnally

−pδ u(0, s) e e−3pδ e−5pδ =2 − + − ··· . ΘS s s s This is a series development which for large values of s or p = s/a rapidly converges. The inverse transformation using correspondence tables (No. 6 from Table 2.3 with x = δ, 3δ, 5δ, . . .) yields a series that is particularly suitable for small times t. This gives Θ(0, t) = 2 [erfc ξ − erfc 3ξ + erfc 5ξ − · · · ] , ΘS in which the abbreviation

δ ξ= √ 2 at

is utilised. The function erfc ξ that appears here is the error function complement, which will be discussed in section 2.3.3.1 and is also shown in Table 2.4. This transcendental function rapidly approaches zero for increasingly large arguments. This provides us with a series for large values of ξ, correspondingly small values of t, which converges very well. Introducing the dimensionless time at t+ := 2 = (2ξ)−2 δ produces, for the dimensionless temperature at x = 0, the series ϑ+ (t+ )

ϑ (0, t+ ) − ϑ0 Θ(0, t) = ϑS − ϑ0 ΘS 1 3 5 = 2 erfc √ − erfc √ + erfc √ − · · · . 2 t+ 2 t+ 2 t+

:=

(2.118)

Fig. 2.20 shows the pattern of ϑ+ (t+ ). Only a few terms are required to give the temperature even at rather large times t+ accurately. The behaviour of ϑ+ (t+ ) at very small times

Fig. 2.20: Plot of the dimensionless temperature ϑ+ (0, t+ ) over time at the adiabatic surface (x = 0) of the wall from Fig. 2.19. Curve 1: ﬁrst term, Curve 2: Sum of the ﬁrst two terms in (2.118), Curve a: asymptotic development according to (2.119) for very small times

2.3 Transient heat conduction

151

√ is described by the ﬁrst term of the asymptotic development of erfc(1/2 t+ ). According to (2.127) from section 2.3.3.1 we obtain for this

4 √+ 1 t exp −1/4t+ . ϑ+ t+ ≈ 2 erfc √ √ + π 2 t

(2.119)

This function is represented by curve a in Fig. 2.20. As an example, a concrete wall with a = 3.75 · 10−6 m2 /s and thickness δ = 0.50 m will be considered. For the “real” time t we get

t = δ 2 /a t+ = 18.5 h t+ . The additional scale in Fig. 2.20 is drawn from this relationship. As an example, after 2.41 h we reach ϑ+ (t+ ) = 0.1, i.e. the temperature at x = 0 will rise by 10% of the temperature increase (ϑS − ϑ0 ) assumed at the other wall surface.

2.3.3

The semi-inﬁnite solid

We will consider transient conduction in a very thick plate, whose free surface x = 0, cf. Fig. 2.21, is bounded by the surroundings and in all other directions is considered to be inﬁnite. The ground at the earth’s surface bordering the atmosphere is a good example of a semi-inﬁnite solid. Bodies of ﬁnite thickness can also be treated as inﬁnitely wide at the beginning of a heating or cooling process which occurs at the surface x = 0, thereby allowing the relatively simple results that follow to be applied to these cases.

2.3.3.1

Heating and cooling with diﬀerent boundary conditions

The desired temperature distribution ϑ = ϑ(x, t) has to fulﬁll the diﬀerential equation ∂ϑ ∂ 2ϑ (2.120) = a 2 , t ≥ 0, x ≥ 0, ∂t ∂x and the simple initial condition ϑ(x, t = 0) = ϑ0 = const . In addition ϑ for x → ∞ has to be bounded. At the surface x = 0 diﬀerent boundary conditions are possible. These are shown in Fig. 2.21: – a jump in the surface temperature to the value ϑS , which should remain constant for t > 0, Fig. 2.21a; – a constant heat ﬂux q˙0 , Fig. 2.21b; – a jump in the temperature of the surroundings to the constant value ϑS = ϑ0 for t > 0, so that heat transfer with a heat transfer coeﬃcient of α takes place, Fig. 2.21c.

152

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Fig. 2.21: Heating of a semi-inﬁnite body with diﬀerent boundary conditions at the surface (x = 0). a jump in the surface temperature to ϑS , b constant heat ﬂux q˙0 , c heat transfer from a ﬂuid at ϑ = ϑS

For the calculation of the temperature distribution in all three cases we introduce the overtemperature Θ := ϑ − ϑ0 as a new dependent variable. Then instead of (2.120) we have ∂ 2 Θ 1 ∂Θ − =0 ∂x2 a ∂t

(2.121)

Θ(x, t = 0) = 0 .

(2.122)

with the initial condition We apply the Laplace transformation to these equations and obtain the ordinary diﬀerential equation already discussed in section 2.3.2 d2 u s − u=0 dx2 a for the Laplace transform u of Θ with the solution s x = C exp (−px) . u(x, s) = C exp − a

(2.123)

As Θ and therefore u must be bounded for x → ∞ the second exponential term exp(+px) in (2.114) disappears. Table 2.4 contains the boundary conditions at x = 0 for the three cases in Fig. 2.21, the Laplace transforms of the boundary conditions and the expressions yielded for the constant C. The inverse transformation of the Laplace transform u according to (2.123) with C from Table 2.4 succeeds without complication by ﬁnding the relevant correspondences in Table 2.3. We will now discuss successively the diﬀerent temperature distributions. With a jump in the surface temperature from ϑ0 to ϑS (Case a) the temperature distribution looks like (No. 6 from Table 2.3) Θ ϑ − ϑ0 x = = erfc √ = erfc ξ . ΘS ϑS − ϑ 0 2 at

(2.124)

2.3 Transient heat conduction

153

Table 2.4: Boundary conditions at the free surface x = 0 of a semi-inﬁnite solid as in Fig. 2.21 with their Laplace transforms and the constants C yielded from Eq. (2.123)

Case

Boundary condition at x = 0

a

Θ = ϑS − ϑ0 = ΘS

−λ

b

c

−λ

Transformed boundary condition

u=

∂Θ = q˙0 ∂x

−λ

∂Θ = α(ΘS − Θ) ∂x

−λ

Constant C in Eq. (2.123)

ΘS s

du q˙0 = dx s

du =α dx

ΘS s

C=

C=

ΘS −u s

C=

q˙0 λsp

αΘS λs (p + α/λ)

It is dependent on the dimensionless variable combination x ξ= √ . 2 at Here 2 erfc ξ = 1 − erf ξ = 1 − √ π

(2.125) ξ

2

e−w dw

(2.126)

0

is the error function complement, whilst erf ξ is called the error function. Table 2.5 gives values of erfc ξ. More extensive tables are available in [2.30] to [2.32]. Series developments and equations for erf ξ and erfc ξ can be found in J. Spanier and K.B. Oldham [2.28]. For larger arguments (ξ > 2.6) the asymptotic development exp(−ξ 2 ) 3 15 1 erfc ξ = √ (2.127) 1− 2 + 4 − 6 + ··· πξ 2ξ 4ξ 8ξ holds. The functions erf ξ and erfc ξ are represented in Fig. 2.22. The limit erfc(ξ = 0) = 1 corresponds to the temperature ϑ = ϑS. It will be reached for x = 0, according to the stipulated boundary condition, and also within the body for very large times (t → ∞). The limit erfc(∞) = 0 corresponds to ϑ = ϑ0 , and consequently to the initial condition for t = 0. The heat ﬂux at depth x at time t is obtained from (2.124) to be q(x, ˙ t) = −λ

∂ϑ λ (ϑS − ϑ0 ) √ exp −x2 /4at . = ∂x πat

It is usual here to introduce the material dependent thermal penetration coeﬃcient √ b := λc = λ/ a , (2.128)

154

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Fig. 2.22: Error functions erf ξ and erfc ξ from (2.126) along with integrated error function ierfc ξ according to (2.134)

which gives q(x, ˙ t) =

b (ϑS − ϑ0 ) √ exp −x2 /4at . πt

(2.129)

At the surface x = 0 √ ˙ t) = b (ϑS − ϑ0 )/ πt . q˙0 = q(0,

(2.130)

The entering heat ﬂux is proportional to the material property b and decays with time as t−1/2 . During the time interval t = 0 to t = t∗ heat t∗ √ 2 Q(t ) = A q(0, ˙ t) dt = A √ b (ϑS − ϑ0 ) t∗ π ∗

(2.131)

0

ﬂows through the surface A. The equations found here are equally valid, without any alteration, for cooling. In this case ϑS < ϑ0 , and in (2.129) to (2.131) the sign is changed. The temperature distribution can, by rearrangement of (2.124), be written as ϑ − ϑS 2 = erf ξ = √ ϑ0 − ϑS π

ξ

2

e−w dw .

(2.132)

0

If the surface of the semi-inﬁnite solid is heated with constant heat ﬂux q˙0 (Case b), the temperature distribution, from No. 7 in Table 2.3 is found to be Θ(x, t) = ϑ(x, t) − ϑ0 = The function

q˙0 √ q˙0 √ t ierfc ξ . 2 at ierfc ξ = 2 λ b

1 2 ierfc ξ = √ e−ξ − ξ erfc ξ π

(2.133)

(2.134)

2.3 Transient heat conduction

155

Table 2.5: Values of the error function complement erfc ξ from (2.126) and the integrated error √ √ 2 function ierfc ξ in the form π ierfc ξ = e−ξ − π ξ erfc ξ ξ

erfc ξ

√ π ierfc ξ

ξ

erfc ξ

√ π ierfc ξ

ξ

erfc ξ

√

π ierfc ξ

0 1.00000 0.05 0.94363 0.10 0.88754 0.15 0.83200 0.20 0.77730

1.00000 0.91388 0.83274 0.75655 0.68525

0.75 0.28884 0.80 0.25790 0.85 0.22933 0.90 0.20309 0.95 0.17911

0.18581 0.16160 0.14003 0.12088 0.10396

1.5 0.03389 1.6 0.02365 1.7 0.01621 1.8 0.01091 1.9 0.00721

0.01528 0.01023 0.00673 0.00436 0.00277

0.25 0.72367 0.30 0.67137 0.35 0.62062 0.40 0.57161 0.45 0.52452

0.61874 0.55694 0.49970 0.44688 0.39833

1.00 0.15730 1.05 0.13756 1.10 0.11980 1.15 0.10388 1.20 0.08969

0.08907 0.07602 0.06463 0.05474 0.04617

2.0 0.00468 2.1 0.00298 2.2 0.00186 2.3 0.00114 2.4 0.00069

0.00173 0.00107 0.00064 0.00038 0.00022

0.50 0.47950 0.55 0.43668 0.60 0.39614 0.65 0.35797 0.70 0.32220

0.35386 0.31327 0.27639 0.24299 0.21287

1.25 0.07710 1.30 0.06599 1.35 0.05624 1.40 0.04771 1.45 0.04031

0.03879 0.03246 0.02705 0.02246 0.01856

2.5 0.00041 2.6 0.00024 2.7 0.00013 2.8 0.00008 2.9 0.00004

0.00013 0.00007 0.00004 0.00002 0.00001

is also called the integrated error function. It is shown in Fig. 2.22 and in Table 2.5. With ierfc(0) = π −1/2 the surface temperature is obtained as ϑ(0, t) = ϑ0 +

q˙0 2 √ √ t . b π

(2.135)

It increases quickly at ﬁrst and then slower as time t goes on. With large thermal penetration coeﬃcients b the material can “swallow” large heat ﬂows, so that the surface temperature increases more slowly than in a body with small b. If heat transfer from a ﬂuid at ϑ = ϑS to the free surface, takes place at x = 0, Case c from Table 2.4, the temperature is also obtained from a correspondence table (No. 11 in Table 2.3). The solution is written in dimensionless form with the variables ϑ − ϑ0 ϑ+ := (2.136) ϑS − ϑ0 and x+ :=

x λ/α

,

t+ :=

at (λ/α)2

(2.137)

giving + √

x+ x ϑ+ x+ , t+ = erfc √ − exp x+ + t+ erfc √ + t+ . 2 t+ 2 t+

(2.138)

This temperature distribution is illustrated in Fig. 2.23. The heat ﬂuxes at the surface and within the body are easily calculated by diﬀerentiating (2.138). The

156

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Fig. 2.23: Temperature ﬁeld ϑ+ (x+ , t+ ) from (2.138) in a semi-inﬁnite solid with heat transfer from a ﬂuid to the free surface x+ = 0. a ϑ+ as a function of x+ with t+ as a parameter, b ϑ+ as a function of t+ with x+ as a parameter

temperature distribution for cooling, ϑS < ϑ0 , is found to be

ϑ − ϑS = 1 − ϑ+ x+ , t+ , ϑ0 − ϑS where ϑ+ (x+ , t+ ) is calculated according to (2.138). 2.3.3.2

Two semi-inﬁnite bodies in contact with each other

We will consider the two semi-inﬁnite bodies shown in Fig. 2.24, which have diﬀerent, but constant, initial temperatures ϑ01 and ϑ02 . Their material properties λ1 , a1 and λ2 , a2 are also diﬀerent. At time t = 0 both bodies are brought into (thermal) contact with each other along the plane indicated by x = 0. After a very short period of time an average temperature ϑm is reached along the plane. Heat ﬂows from body 1 with the higher initial temperature to body 2 which has a lower temperature. The transient conduction process described here serves as a model for the description of short-time contact between two (ﬁnite) bodies at diﬀerent temperatures. Examples of this include the touching of diﬀerent objects with a hand or foot and the short-time interaction of a heated metal body with a cooled object in reforming processes. The heat conduction equation holds for both bodies and is ∂ 2 ϑ1 ∂ϑ1 = a1 , ∂t ∂x2

x≥0 ,

as well as

∂ 2 ϑ2 ∂ϑ2 = a2 , x≤0 . ∂t ∂x2 At the interface the conditions, according to section 2.1.3 (ϑ1 )+0 = (ϑ2 )−0 = ϑm

2.3 Transient heat conduction

157

Fig. 2.24: Temperature pattern in two semi-inﬁnite bodies with initial temperatures ϑ01 and ϑ02 in contact with each other along the plane x = 0

and λ1

∂ϑ1 ∂x

= λ2 +0

∂ϑ2 ∂x

(2.139) −0

must be fulﬁlled. In addition to this the initial conditions already mentioned are valid. For the solution, we assume the contact temperature ϑm at x = 0 to be independent of t. As will be shown this assumption is valid and enables a simple solution to the problem to be found. The problem is split into two parts whose solutions have already been discussed in section 2.3.3.1: A temperature distribution appears in each body, which develops beginning with the constant initial temperatures ϑ01 and ϑ02 , respectively, when the surface temperature jumps to the constant value ϑm . For body 1, with the following variable combination √ ξ1 = x/ 4a1 t (2.140) we obtain, according to (2.132), the temperature ϑ1 = ϑm + (ϑ01 − ϑm ) erf ξ1 with a derivative at x = +0 of

∂ϑ1 ∂x

Analogous to this, with

+0

x≥0 ,

,

ϑ01 − ϑm = √ . πa1 t

(2.141)

(2.142)

√ ξ2 = x/ 4a2 t

(2.143)

it holds for body 2 according to (2.124) ϑ2 = ϑ02 + (ϑm − ϑ02 ) erfc(−ξ2 ) and at the boundary

∂ϑ2 ∂x

−0

,

ϑm − ϑ02 = √ . πa2 t

x≤0 ,

(2.144)

(2.145)

Putting (2.142) and (2.145) in the boundary condition (2.139), a relationship independent of t follows: λ1 λ2 √ (ϑ01 − ϑm ) = √ (ϑm − ϑ02 ) a1 a2 or b1 (ϑ01 − ϑm ) = b2 (ϑm − ϑ02 ) . (2.146) The assumption of a time independent contact temperature ϑm was therefore appropriate. Its position depends on the thermal penetration coeﬃcients b1 = λ1 c1 1 and b2 = λ2 c2 2

158

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

of the two bodies. It follows from (2.146) that ϑm = ϑ02 +

b1 (ϑ01 − ϑ02 ) . b1 + b2

(2.147)

The time independent contact temperature lies in the vicinity of the initial temperature of the body with the larger thermal penetration coeﬃcient. Equation (2.147) explains why diﬀerent solids at the same temperature feel as if they were warmed to diﬀering degrees when touched by the hand or foot.

2.3.3.3

Periodic temperature variations

Periodic temperature variations frequently appear in both nature and technology. These include the daily temperature changes which occur in building walls and the daily or seasonal temperature variations in the earth’s crust. The cylinders in combustion engines undergo large and high frequency temperature changes, which penetrate the inner walls of the cylinders and can have some inﬂuence on the strength of the material. In the following we will consider a simple model that reproduces these temperature variations in an approximate manner and indicates their most signiﬁcant properties. We will look at a semi-inﬁnite solid with constant material properties λ and a. It is bounded by a ﬂuid at the free surface x = 0, which has a temperature ϑF , which changes according to the time law t ϑF (t) = ϑm + Δϑ cos ωt = ϑm + Δϑ cos 2π . (2.148) t0 This temperature oscillation is harmonic with a periodic time of t0 and an amplitude of Δϑ around the mean value ϑm. At the surface x = 0 the heat transfer condition is ∂ϑ −λ = α [ϑF − ϑ(0, t)] (2.149) ∂x x=0 with a constant value for α stipulated. We are looking for the temperature ﬁeld ϑ = ϑ (x, t), which appears after a long period of time as a quasi-steady end state in the body, when the disturbances caused by the initial temperature distribution have faded away. A solution to this heat conduction problem is once again possible applying the Laplace transformation, cf. [2.18], [2.26] or [2.1], p. 317–319, where the part originating from a constant initial temperature was calculated, which fades away to zero after a suﬃciently long time interval. As this solution method is fairly complicated we will choose an alternative. It can be expected that the temperature in the interior of the body also undergoes an harmonic oscillation, which with increasing depth x will be damped more and more, and in addition it will show a phase shift. The corresponding formulation for this ϑ(x, t) = ϑm + Δϑ η e−mx cos (ωt − mx − ε)

(2.150)

2.3 Transient heat conduction

159

Fig. 2.25: Fluid temperature over time ϑF from (2.148) and surface temperature ϑ(0, t) from (2.153) with k = (b/α) π/t0 = 1.0

satisﬁes the heat conduction equation (2.120), when m2 =

ω π . = 2a at0

(2.151)

The constants η and ε are yielded from the boundary condition (2.149) to 1 √ = 1 + 2k + 2k 2 η and ε = arctan with

λ mλ = k= α α

(2.152a)

k 1+k

π b = at0 α

(2.152b)

π . t0

(2.152c)

Their meaning is recognised when the surface temperature is calculated. From (2.150) with x = 0 it follows that ϑ(0, t) = ϑm + Δϑ η cos (ωt − ε) .

(2.153)

The amplitude of this oscillation is reduced by the factor η < 1 against the oscillation amplitude of the ﬂuid temperature. In addition the surface temperature has a phase shift of ε against the ﬂuid temperature, Fig. 2.25. The temperature at any particular depth x behaves in the same manner as the surface temperature. It oscillates harmonically with the same angular frequency ω, an increasingly damped amplitude at greater depths and a phase shift that grows with x. At each point in time (2.150) represents a temperature wave which is rapidly fading away with increasing depth inside the body, Fig. 2.26. Its wavelength is the distance between two points whose phase angles diﬀer by 2π. If x1 and x2 are such points then from ωt − mx1 − ε = ωt − mx2 − ε + 2π

160

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Fig. 2.26: Temperature waves according to (2.155) in a semi-inﬁnite solid with harmonic oscillation of the surface temperature with η = 1 and ε = 0

the wavelength follows as Λ = x2 − x1 =

√ 2π = 2 πat0 . m

This gives for the temperature distribution x t − ϑ(x, t) = ϑm + Δϑ η e−2πx/Λ cos 2π −ε . t0 Λ

(2.154)

(2.155)

In order to ﬁnd the penetration depth of the temperature ﬂuctuation we calculate the depth xn , at which the amplitude has fallen to an n-th part of its value at the surface x = 0. From e−2πxn /Λ = 1/n at0 Λ xn = ln n = ln n . (2.156) 2π π Penetration depth and wavelength increase with the thermal diﬀusivity of the body and the periodic time. High frequency oscillations, which appear in fast running combustion engines, have a much lower penetration depth in the cylinder we ﬁnd

2.3 Transient heat conduction

161

wall than that in the ground caused by the daily or even seasonal temperature variations in the air temperature. A reduction in the amplitude to only 1% of the value at the surface (n = 100), takes place, according to (2.156) at a depth of x100 = 0.733Λ. Already at this depth the temperature oscillations are of little practical importance.

2.3.4

Cooling or heating of simple bodies in one-dimensional heat ﬂow

The time dependent temperature ﬁeld ϑ = ϑ(r, t) in a body is described by the diﬀerential equation 2 ∂ ϑ n ∂ϑ ∂ϑ (2.157) =a + ∂t ∂r2 r ∂r with n = 0, 1 and 2 for a plate, a cylinder and a sphere, when geometrical onedimensional heat ﬂow, i.e. heat ﬂow in only the r-direction is assumed. In a cylinder or sphere r is the radial coordinate. The cylinder must be very long compared to its diameter so that the heat ﬂow in the axial direction can be neglected. In addition the temperature ϑ must not depend on the angular coordinates, this condition is also prescribed for the sphere. For a plate, as already done in section 1.1.2, the x-coordinate is indicated by r. It is the coordinate perpendicular to the two very large boundary planes, and is taken from the middle of the plate. 2.3.4.1

Formulation of the problem

The three bodies — plate, very long cylinder and sphere — shall have a constant initial temperature ϑ0 at time t = 0. For t > 0 the surface of the body is brought into contact with a ﬂuid whose temperature ϑS = ϑ0 is constant with time. Heat is then transferred between the body and the ﬂuid. If ϑS < ϑ0 , the body is cooled and if ϑS > ϑ0 it is heated. This transient heat conduction process runs until the body assumes the temperature ϑS of the ﬂuid. This is the steady end-state. The heat transfer coeﬃcient α is assumed to be equal on both sides of the plate, and for the cylinder or sphere it is constant over the whole of the surface in contact with the ﬂuid. It is independent of time for all three cases. If only half of the plate is considered, the heat conduction problem corresponds to the unidirectional heating or cooling of a plate whose other surface is insulated (adiabatic). Under the assumptions mentioned, we obtain the boundary conditions r=0:

∂ϑ =0 ∂r

due to symmetry and r=R:

−λ

∂ϑ = α (ϑ − ϑS) . ∂r

162

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Fig. 2.27: Diagram explaining the initial and boundary conditions for the cooling of a plate of thickness 2R, a long cylinder and a sphere, each of radius R

Additionally the initial condition t=0:

0≤r≤R ,

ϑ(r) = ϑ0 ,

is valid, cf. Fig. 2.27. It is useful to introduce dimensionless variables. We put r+ := r/R

and t+ := at/R2

(2.158)

with R as half the thickness of the plate or cylinder or sphere radius, along with ϑ+ :=

ϑ − ϑS . ϑ0 − ϑS

(2.159)

With these quantities the diﬀerential equation (2.157) is transformed into ∂ 2 ϑ+ n ∂ϑ+ ∂ϑ+ = + . 2 ∂t+ r+ ∂r+ ∂r+

(2.160)

The boundary conditions are ∂ϑ+ = 0 for r+ = 0 ∂r+ and −

∂ϑ+ = Bi ϑ+ ∂r+

for r+ = 1

(2.161)

(2.162)

with the Biot number Bi = αR/λ , cf. section 2.1.5. The initial condition is ϑ+ = 1 for t+ = 0 .

(2.163)

The desired dimensionless temperature proﬁle in the three bodies has the form

ϑ+ = fn r+ , t+ , Bi , where diﬀerent functions fn are yielded for the plate (n = 0), the cylinder (n = 1) and the sphere (n = 2), because in each case the diﬀerential equation is diﬀerent.

2.3 Transient heat conduction

163

Fig. 2.28: Temperature ratio ϑ+ = (ϑ − ϑS )/(ϑ0 − ϑS ). a in cooling and b in heating

The dimensionless temperature can only assume values between ϑ+ = 0 (for t+ → ∞) and ϑ+ = 1 (for t+ = 0). The temperature variations during cooling and heating are described in the same manner by ϑ+ , cf. Fig. 2.28. In cooling (ϑS < ϑ0 ) according to (2.159)

ϑ(x, t) = ϑS + (ϑ0 − ϑS ) ϑ+ r+ , t+ holds, and for heating (ϑS > ϑ0 ) it follows that

. ϑ(x, t) = ϑ0 + (ϑS − ϑ0 ) 1 − ϑ+ r+ , t+ For Bi → ∞ we obtain the special case of the surface of the bodies being kept at the constant temperature ϑS of the ﬂuid, correspondingly ϑ+ = 0. This gives for the same temperature diﬀerence ϑ0 − ϑS the fastest possible cooling or heating rate (α → ∞). 2.3.4.2

Separating the variables

In order to ﬁnd a solution to the diﬀerential equation (2.160) whilst accounting for the initial and boundary conditions, the method of separating the variables or product solution is used3 ϑ+ (r+ , t+ ) = F (r+ ) · G(t+ ) . The functions F and G each depend on only one variable, and satisfy the following diﬀerential equation from (2.160) 2 dF n dF + dG F (r ) + = G(t+ ) + dt dr+ 2 r+ dr+ or 2 dF 1 dG 1 n dF . (2.164) = + G(t+ ) dt+ F (r+ ) dr+ 2 r+ dr+ 3

The application of the Laplace transformation delivers the same result. The inverse transformation from the frequency to the time region requires the use of the inversion theorem, see 2.3.2. In order to avoid this in this case the simple, classical product solution is applied.

164

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

The left hand side of (2.164) depends on the (dimensionless) time t+ , the right hand side on the position coordinate r+ : the variables are separated. The equality demanded by (2.164) is only possible if both sides of (2.164) are equal to a constant −μ2 . This constant μ is known as the separation parameter. With this the following ordinary diﬀerential equations are produced from (2.164) dG + μ2 G = 0 dt+

(2.165)

and

n dF d2 F + μ2 F = 0 . (2.166) 2 + + + r dr+ dr Products of their solutions with the same value of the separation parameter μ give solutions to the heat conduction equation (2.160). The solution of the diﬀerential equation (2.165) for the time function G(t+ ) is the decaying exponential function

G(t+ ) = C exp −μ2 t+ . (2.167) This is true for all three bodies. The position function F is diﬀerent for plates, cylinders and spheres. However, the solution functions F have to satisfy the same boundary conditions in all three cases. It follows from (2.161) and (2.162) that dF = 0 for r+ = 0 dr+

(2.168)

and

dF = Bi F for r+ = 1 . (2.169) dr+ The boundary value problem posed by the diﬀerential equation (2.166) and the two boundary conditions (2.168) and (2.169) leads to the class of Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problems for which a series of general theorems are valid. As we will soon show the solution function F only satisﬁes the boundary conditions with certain discrete values μi of the separation parameter. These special values μi are called eigenvalues of the boundary value problem, and the accompanying solution functions Fi are known as eigenfunctions. The most important rules from the theory of Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problems are, cf. e.g. K. J¨anich [2.33]: 1. All eigenvalues are real. 2. The eigenvalues form a monotonically increasing inﬁnite series −

μ 1 < μ2 < μ3 . . .

with

lim μi = +∞ .

i→∞

3. The associated eigenfunctions F1 , F2, . . . are orthogonal, i.e. it holds that "

b +

Fi Fj dr =

0 for i = j Ai for i = j

a

with Ai as a positive constant. Here a and b are the two points at which the boundary conditions are stipulated. In our problem a = 0 and b = 1.

2.3 Transient heat conduction

165

4. The eigenfunction Fi associated with the eigenvalue μi has exactly (i − 1) zero points between the boundaries, or in other words in the interval (a, b). These properties will now be used in the following solutions of the boundary value problems for a plate, a cylinder and a sphere.

2.3.4.3

Results for the plate

The function F (r+ ) satisﬁes the diﬀerential equation (2.166) for the plate with n = 0, which is known as the diﬀerential equation governing harmonic oscillations. It has the general solution

F = c1 cos μr+ + c2 sin μr+ . It follows from the boundary condition (2.168) that c2 = 0. The heat transfer condition (2.169) leads to a transcendental equation for the separation parameter μ, namely tan μ = Bi/μ . (2.170) The roots μ = μi of this equation are the eigenvalues of the problem, which depend on the Biot number. As Fig. 2.29 shows, there is an inﬁnite series of eigenvalues μ1 < μ2 < μ3 . . . which is in full agreement with the Sturm-Liouville theory. Only the following eigenfunctions

Fi = cos μi r+ associated with the eigenvalues μi satisfy both the boundary conditions (2.168) and (2.169). Therefore, the inﬁnite series shown below, made up of the inﬁnite number of eigenfunctions and the time dependent function G(t+ ) according to

Fig. 2.29: Graphical determination of the eigenvalues according to (2.170)

166

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

(2.167), ϑ+ (r+ , t+ ) =

∞ %

Ci cos μi r+ exp(−μ2i t+ )

(2.171)

i=1

is the general solution to the heat conduction problem in a plate. It still has to ﬁt the initial condition (2.163). It must therefore hold that 1=

∞ %

Ci cos μi r+

,

0 ≤ r+ ≤ 1 .

i=1

A given function, in this case the number 1, is to be represented by the inﬁnite sum of eigenfunctions in the interval [0, 1]. The coeﬃcient Ci is obtained by multiplying with an eigenfunction cos (μj r+ ) and integrating from r+ = 0 to r+ = 1. As the eigenfunctions are orthogonal all the terms in which j = i vanish. The only term which remains is that with j = i, so that 1 1

+ + cos μi r dr = Ci cos2 μi r+ dr+ 0

0

delivers the coeﬃcient Ci with the result Ci =

1 2 sin μi 2Bi = 2 . μi + sin μi cos μi Bi + Bi + μ2i cos μi

(2.172)

With this the desired temperature distribution for cooling or heating a plate is found. The eigenvalues μi and the coeﬃcients Ci are dependent on the Biot number. Table 2.6 contains values for μ1 and C1 . Values of the ﬁrst six eigenvalues are given in [2.1]. For Bi → ∞ the boundary condition ϑ+ (1, t+ ) = 0, corresponding to ϑ(R) = ϑS , is obtained with eigenvalues μ1 = π/2, μ2 = 3π/2, μ3 = 5π/2, . . . For Bi = 0, the limiting case of an insulated wall with ﬁnite thermal conductivity λ, but with α = 0, we obtain μ1 = 0, μ2 = π, μ3 = 2π, . . . The temperature proﬁle is given by ϑ+ = 1 independent of t+ , which is plausible for physical reasons. In addition to the temperatures calculated according to (2.171) the energy, which the plate absorbs or releases as heat during a speciﬁc time interval, is often of interest. If a plate of volume V is cooled from its initial temperature ϑ0 to the temperature of the surroundings ϑS (for t → ∞), it releases the energy Q0 = V c (ϑ0 − ϑS ) as heat to the surroundings. After a certain time t has passed the plate has released Q(t) = V c [ϑ0 − ϑm (t)] as heat to the environment. In which 1 ϑm (t) = R

R ϑ(r, t) dr 0

2.3 Transient heat conduction

167

Table 2.6: Smallest eigenvalue μ1 from (2.170), (2.177) or (2.182), associated expansion coefﬁcient C1 in the series for the temperature distribution ϑ+ (r+ , t+ ) as well as coeﬃcient D1 in + the series for the average temperature ϑ+ m (t ) of a plate, a very long cylinder and a sphere, cf. also (2.185) and (2.188) in section 2.3.4.5

Bi

μ1

Plate C1

D1

μ1

Cylinder C1

D1

μ1

Sphere C1

D1

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05

0.09983 0.14095 0.17234 0.19868 0.22176

1.0017 1.0033 1.0049 1.0066 1.0082

1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9999

0.14124 0.19950 0.24403 0.28143 0.31426

1.0025 1.0050 1.0075 1.0099 1.0124

1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9999

0.17303 0.24446 0.29910 0.34503 0.38537

1.0030 1.0060 1.0090 1.0120 1.0150

1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10

0.24253 0.26153 0.27913 0.29557 0.31105

1.0098 1.0114 1.0130 1.0145 1.0161

0.9999 0.9999 0.9999 0.9998 0.9998

0.34383 0.37092 0.39603 0.41954 0.44168

1.0148 1.0173 1.0197 1.0222 1.0246

0.9999 0.9999 0.9999 0.9998 0.9998

0.42173 0.45506 0.48600 0.51497 0.54228

1.0179 1.0209 1.0239 1.0268 1.0298

0.9999 0.9999 0.9999 0.9999 0.9998

0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.40

0.37788 0.43284 0.48009 0.52179 0.59324

1.0237 1.0311 1.0382 1.0450 1.0580

0.9995 0.9992 0.9988 0.9983 0.9971

0.53761 0.61697 0.68559 0.74646 0.85158

1.0365 1.0483 1.0598 1.0712 1.0931

0.9995 0.9992 0.9988 0.9983 0.9970

0.66086 0.75931 0.84473 0.92079 1.05279

1.0445 1.0592 1.0737 1.0880 1.1164

0.9996 0.9993 0.9990 0.9985 0.9974

0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90

0.65327 0.70507 0.75056 0.79103 0.82740

1.0701 1.0814 1.0918 1.1016 1.1107

0.9956 0.9940 0.9922 0.9903 0.9882

0.94077 1.01844 1.08725 1.14897 1.20484

1.1143 1.1345 1.1539 1.1724 1.1902

0.9954 0.9936 0.9916 0.9893 0.9869

1.16556 1.26440 1.35252 1.43203 1.50442

1.1441 1.1713 1.1978 1.2236 1.2488

0.9960 0.9944 0.9925 0.9904 0.9880

1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40

0.86033 0.89035 0.91785 0.94316 0.96655

1.1191 1.1270 1.1344 1.1412 1.1477

0.9861 0.9839 0.9817 0.9794 0.9771

1.25578 1.30251 1.34558 1.38543 1.42246

1.2071 1.2232 1.2387 1.2533 1.2673

0.9843 0.9815 0.9787 0.9757 0.9727

1.57080 1.63199 1.68868 1.74140 1.79058

1.2732 1.2970 1.3201 1.3424 1.3640

0.9855 0.9828 0.9800 0.9770 0.9739

1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90

0.98824 1.00842 1.02725 1.04486 1.06136

1.1537 1.1593 1.1645 1.1695 1.1741

0.9748 0.9726 0.9703 0.9680 0.9658

1.45695 1.48917 1.51936 1.54769 1.57434

1.2807 1.2934 1.3055 1.3170 1.3279

0.9696 0.9665 0.9633 0.9601 0.9569

1.83660 1.87976 1.92035 1.95857 1.99465

1.3850 1.4052 1.4247 1.4436 1.4618

0.9707 0.9674 0.9640 0.9605 0.9570

2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80

1.07687 1.10524 1.13056 1.15330 1.17383

1.1785 1.1864 1.1934 1.1997 1.2052

0.9635 0.9592 0.9549 0.9509 0.9469

1.59945 1.64557 1.68691 1.72418 1.75794

1.3384 1.3578 1.3754 1.3914 1.4059

0.9537 0.9472 0.9408 0.9345 0.9284

2.02876 2.09166 2.14834 2.19967 2.24633

1.4793 1.5125 1.5433 1.5718 1.5982

0.9534 0.9462 0.9389 0.9316 0.9243

3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00

1.19246 1.23227 1.26459 1.29134 1.31384

1.2102 1.2206 1.2287 1.2351 1.2402

0.9431 0.9343 0.9264 0.9193 0.9130

1.78866 1.85449 1.90808 1.95248 1.98981

1.4191 1.4473 1.4698 1.4880 1.5029

0.9224 0.9081 0.8950 0.8830 0.8721

2.28893 2.38064 2.45564 2.51795 2.57043

1.6227 1.6761 1.7202 1.7567 1.7870

0.9171 0.8995 0.8830 0.8675 0.8533

168

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Table 2.6: continued

Bi

μ1

Plate C1

D1

μ1

Cylinder C1

D1

μ1

Sphere C1

D1

6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00

1.34955 1.37662 1.39782 1.41487 1.42887

1.2479 1.2532 1.2570 1.2598 1.2620

0.9021 0.8932 0.8858 0.8796 0.8743

2.04901 2.09373 2.12864 2.15661 2.17950

1.5253 1.5411 1.5526 1.5611 1.5677

0.8532 0.8375 0.8244 0.8133 0.8039

2.65366 2.71646 2.76536 2.80443 2.83630

1.8338 1.8673 1.8920 1.9106 1.9249

0.8281 0.8069 0.7889 0.7737 0.7607

12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00

1.45050 1.46643 1.47864 1.48830 1.49613

1.2650 1.2669 1.2683 1.2692 1.2699

0.8658 0.8592 0.8541 0.8499 0.8464

2.21468 2.24044 2.26008 2.27555 2.28805

1.5769 1.5828 1.5869 1.5898 1.5919

0.7887 0.7770 0.7678 0.7603 0.7542

2.88509 2.92060 2.94756 2.96871 2.98572

1.9450 1.9581 1.9670 1.9734 1.9781

0.7397 0.7236 0.7109 0.7007 0.6922

25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 50.00

1.51045 1.52017 1.52719 1.53250 1.54001

1.2710 1.2717 1.2721 1.2723 1.2727

0.8400 0.8355 0.8322 0.8296 0.8260

2.31080 2.32614 2.33719 2.34552 2.35724

1.5954 1.5973 1.5985 1.5993 1.6002

0.7427 0.7348 0.7290 0.7246 0.7183

3.01656 3.03724 3.05207 3.06321 3.07884

1.9856 1.9898 1.9924 1.9942 1.9962

0.6766 0.6658 0.6579 0.6519 0.6434

60.00 80.00 100.00 200.00 ∞

1.54505 1.55141 1.55525 1.56298 1.57080

1.2728 1.2730 1.2731 1.2732 1.2732

0.8235 0.8204 0.8185 0.8146 0.8106

2.36510 2.37496 2.38090 2.39283 2.40483

1.6007 1.6013 1.6015 1.6019 1.6020

0.7140 0.7085 0.7052 0.6985 0.6917

3.08928 3.10234 3.11019 3.12589 3.14159

1.9974 1.9985 1.9990 1.9998 2.0000

0.6376 0.6303 0.6259 0.6170 0.6079

is the average temperature of the plate at time t. The ratio ϑ0 − ϑm (t) Q(t) + = = 1 − ϑ+ m (t ) Q0 ϑ0 − ϑS

(2.173)

+ is determined by the dimensionless average temperature ϑ+ m (t ). This is found by integrating (2.171)

∞ ∞ % %

exp −μ2i t+ sin μi + Ci exp −μ2i t+ = 2Bi2 ϑ+ . (2.174) m (t ) = μi μ2 (Bi2 + Bi + μ2i ) i=1 i=1 i

The equations, (2.171) for the temperature distribution in the plate as well as (2.173) and (2.174) for the released heat have been repeatedly evaluated and illustrated in diagrams, cf. [2.34] and [2.35]. In view of the computing technology available today the direct evaluation of the relationships given above is advantageous, particularly in simulation programs in which these transient heat conduction processes appear. The applications of the relationships developed here is made easier, as for large values of t+ only the ﬁrst term of the inﬁnite series is required, cf. section 2.3.4.5. Special equations for very small t+ will be derived in section 2.3.4.6. In addition to these there are also approximation equations which are numerically more simple than the relationships derived here, see [2.74].

2.3 Transient heat conduction

169

Example 2.4: In example 2.3 of section 2.3.2, the temperature ϑ (0, t+ ) at x = 0 of the adiabatic surface of a ﬂat wall (plate) was calculated. ϑ (0, t+ ) changed, as a result of the stepwise increase in the temperature from ϑ0 to ϑS at the other wall surface. For ϑ (0, t+ ) in example 2.3 we found ϑ (0, t+ ) − ϑ0 3 5 1 √ √ √ − 2 erfc + 2 erfc −... (2.175) = 2 erfc ϑS − ϑ0 2 t+ 2 t+ 2 t+ This equation will now be confronted with the relationships from (2.171). The rapid change in the surface temperature at r = R (corresponding to x = δ in example 2.3) means that α → ∞, and therefore Bi → ∞. This gives, from (2.170), the eigenvalues μ1 =

π 2

,

μ2 =

3π 2

μ3 =

,

5π 2

,

...

and from (2.172) the coeﬃcients C1 =

4 π

,

C2 = −

4 3π

,

C3 =

4 5π

,

...

Then from (2.171) it follows that 2 ∞ i+1 ϑ (0, t+ ) − ϑS 4 % (−1) π 2 = exp − (2i − 1) t+ . ϑ0 − ϑS π i=1 2i − 1 4 The corresponding equation to (2.175) is found to be 2 ϑ (0, t+ ) − ϑ0 4 4 π 9π 2 + − = 1 − exp − t+ + exp − t ϑS − ϑ0 π 4 3π 4 2 4 25π + +... − exp − t 5π 4

(2.176)

The equations (2.175) and (2.176) describe the same temperature change. While (2.175) rapidly converges for small times t+ , (2.176) is particularly well suited to large times t+ . This is shown by the following comparison of two times t+ = 0.1 and t+ = 1.0. For t+ = 0.1 we obtain with only the ﬁrst term from (2.175) the value 0.05070 to ﬁve decimal places. In (2.176), however, it is necessary to use three terms of the inﬁnite series 1 − 0.99484 + 0.04607 − 0.00053 + . . . = 0.05070 . +

For the time t = 1.0 the ﬁrst term in the series in (2.176) is suﬃcient to give 1 − 0.10798 + . . . = 0.89202 . This result is only possible with the ﬁrst three terms when (2.175) is used 0.95900 − 0.06779 + 0.00081 − . . . = 0.89202 .

2.3.4.4

Results for the cylinder and the sphere

For an inﬁnitely long cylinder the function F (r+ ) is determined by (2.166) with n = 1. This is the zero-order Bessel diﬀerential equation and its solutions are the Bessel function J0 and the Neumann function N0 both of zero-order:

F r+ = c1 J0 μr+ + c2 N0 μr + .

170

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

The symmetry condition (2.168) rules N0 out (c2 = 0). In the same manner as for the plate the heat transfer condition (2.169) delivers a deﬁning equation for the eigenvalues μi : −

dJ0 (μr+ ) = Bi J0 μr + dr +

for r+ = 1

or μ J1 (μ) = Bi J0 (μ)

(2.177)

with J1 as the ﬁrst-order Bessel function. Tables of the Bessel functions J0 and J1 can be found in [2.30] and [2.32]; information about their properties and equations used in their calculation are available in [2.28]. Once again an inﬁnite number of eigenvalues μi is obtained as a solution of (2.177), which the eigenfunctions Fi = J0 (μi r + ) belong to. The sum ∞

%

ϑ + r + , t+ = Ci J0 μi r + exp −μ2i t+

(2.178)

i=1

is a solution of the heat conduction equation for the cylinder which satisﬁes the boundary conditions. The initial condition (2.163), namely ϑ+ (r+ , 0) = 1, provides us with the expansion coeﬃcients 2J1 (μi ) 2Bi = . (2.179) Ci = μi [J02 (μi ) + J12 (μi )] (Bi2 + μ2i ) J0 (μi ) Table 2.6 gives the ﬁrst eigenvalue μ1 and the associated C1 as functions of the Biot number. Values for the ﬁrst six eigenvalues can be found in [2.1]. The ratio of the heat Q(t) released in time t to the maximum value Q0 for t → ∞ is given by (2.173). The dimensionless average temperature ϑ+ m is calculated for the cylinder from 1

+ + + r , t r + dr+ . ϑ+ m =2 ϑ 0

Integration of (2.178) yields

∞ % +

exp −μ2i t+ 2 t = 4Bi . ϑ+ m μ2 (Bi2 + μ2i ) i=1 i

(2.180)

The temperature distribution in the sphere is obtained in the same manner, such that ∞

%

sin (μi r + ) ϑ+ r+ , t+ = Ci exp −μ2i t+ . + μ r i i=1

(2.181)

The eigenvalues are the roots of the transcendental equation μ cot μ = 1 − Bi .

(2.182)

The coeﬃcients Ci are found to be Ci = 2

sin μi − μi cos μi μ2 + (Bi − 1)2 sin μi = 2Bi 2 i . μi − sin μi cos μi μi + Bi (Bi − 1) μi

This then gives the dimensionless average temperature ϑ+ m

1 +

t = 3 ϑ+ r+ , t+ r +2 dr + 0

(2.183)

2.3 Transient heat conduction

for a sphere, as the series ∞ % +

2 ϑ+ t = 6Bi m i=1

exp −μ2i t+ . μ2i [μ2i + Bi (Bi − 1)]

171

(2.184)

This then leaves the heat Q(t+ ) relative to the maximum value Q0 to be calculated according to (2.173). Table 2.6 contains the ﬁrst eigenvalue μ1 as the solution of (2.182) and the accompanying coeﬃcients C1 from (2.183) as functions of Bi. Values for the ﬁrst six eigenvalues are available in [2.1]. Graphical representations of the temperature proﬁles in very long cylinders and spheres can be found in the publications [2.34] and [2.35] which have already been mentioned in this chapter, and the associated approximation equations are available in [2.74]. The change in the dimensionless temperature ϑ+ (0, t+ ) in the centre r+ = 0 of the three bodies, plate (centre plane), very long cylinder (axis) and the sphere (centre) is shown in Fig. 2.30.

Fig. 2.30: Temperature change with time ϑ+ (t+ ) in the centre (r + = 0) of a plate, a very long cylinder and a sphere for Bi = αR/λ = 1.0

2.3.4.5

Approximation for large times: Restriction to the ﬁrst term in the series

For suﬃciently large times t+ the ﬁrst term of the series (2.171), (2.178) and (2.181), is suﬃcient to calculate the temperature proﬁle for a plate, an inﬁnitely long cylinder and a sphere. The simple result ⎧ + ⎪ plate ⎨ cos (μr )

+ + + 2 + + J0 (μr ) cylinder ϑ1 r , t = C exp −μ t (2.185) ⎪ ⎩ sin (μr+ ) / (μr+ ) sphere is obtained. The ﬁrst eigenvalue μ = μ1 and its associated expansion coeﬃcient C = C1 depend on the Biot number Bi = αR/λ. They have diﬀerent values for the plate, cylinder and sphere. These values are displayed in Table 2.6.

172

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

U. Grigull and others [2.36] have investigated the errors which develop when the higher terms in the series are neglected. If a certain deviation + +

Δϑ+ := ϑ+ − ϑ + r + , t+ (2.186) 1 r ,t + is allowed, where ϑ+ 1 is the ﬁrst term from (2.185) and ϑ the complete series, a + dimensionless time tmin can be calculated for which this error just appears. t+ min + depends on r+ and the Biot number. For all times t+ > t+ min the ﬁrst term ϑ1 + from (2.185) can be used without an error greater than Δϑ being incurred. Fig. 2.31 shows the results found by U. Grigull [2.36] for r+ = 0 (central plane, central axis or centre) and Δϑ+ = 0.001 as a function of Bi. At small Bi numbers the ﬁrst term is already suﬃcient for rather small times t+ > t+ min .

+ Fig. 2.31: Minimum time t+ = 0.001, according to min for which the error is less than Δϑ (2.186), neglecting the higher series terms at r + = 0. P plate, C very long cylinder, S sphere

Equation (2.185) enables an explicit calculation for the heating or cooling time to be carried out. This time tk is deﬁned such that once the time has passed a given temperature ϑk is reached in the centre of the thermally conductive body (r+ = 0). This temperature ϑk corresponds to a particular value ϑ+ k = (ϑk − ϑS ) / (ϑ0 − ϑS ) . With r+ = 0 we obtain from (2.185) 2 +

ϑ+ k = C exp −μ tk and from that we get t+ k =

atk 1 = 2 ln C − ln ϑ+ . k R2 μ

(2.187)

+ + Therefore t+ k increases, because of ϑk < 1, the smaller the value of ϑk that is chosen. Equation (2.187) can be easily evaluated with the assistance of Table 2.6.

2.3 Transient heat conduction

173

The dimensionless average temperature ϑ+ m , which is required for the calculation of the heat absorbed or released by the body according to (2.173), can also be easily calculated when only the ﬁrst term of the series is used. From (2.174), (2.180) and (2.184) we obtain 2 +

ϑ+ . (2.188) m = D exp −μ t The coeﬃcient D = D1 , which is dependent on the Biot number is given in Table 2.6. 2.3.4.6

A solution for small times

At the beginning of a heating or cooling process (t+ small) many terms of the inﬁnite series (2.171), (2.178) or (2.181), are required to calculate the temperature proﬁle in a plate, cylinder or sphere exactly. This implies that an alternative solution method for these types of thermal conduction problems needs to be found which converges well for small times. We ﬁnd it with the aid of the Laplace transformation, where the Laplace transform of the temperature is expanded into a series which converges for large values of s, cf. section 2.3.2. Term by term back transformation using the correspondence table, produces expressions which are particularly suitable for the calculation of the temperature ﬁelds at small times. This method was ﬁrst applied by S. Goldstein [2.37], cf. also [2.36]. We will restrict ourselves to the results for the plate. The solutions for cylinders and spheres lead to more complicated relationships. These can be found in [2.36] and [2.37]. For the heating or cooling of a plate dealt with in section 2.3.4.3 and written in dimensionless variables according to (2.158) and (2.159), we obtain ' + √ ( + 1+r + 2 + √ √ ϑ+ (r+ , t+ ) = 1 − erfc 1+r − exp [Bi (1 + r ) + Bi t ] erfc + Bi t+ + + 2 t 2 t ' ( √ + + 1−r + 2 + + √ √ − erfc 1−r + exp [Bi (1 − r ) + Bi t ] erfc + Bi t + + 2 t 2 t + ... (2.189) This solution allows for a clear interpretation. The terms in the curly brackets correspond to the temperature pattern in a semi-inﬁnite solid. Its surface lies at r+ = −1 for the ﬁrst term, and it stretches itself out in the positive r+ -direction. The second term belongs to a semi-inﬁnite body which stretches out from its surface at r+ = +1 in the negative r+ -direction. The subtraction of these two temperature proﬁles from the initial temperature ϑ+ = 1 yields the symmetrical temperature proﬁle for the plate shown in Fig. 2.32, which satisﬁes the condition ∂ϑ+ /∂r+ = 0 at r+ = 0. The solution (2.189) is only valid for times, for which the contribution of the ﬁrst curly bracket to the surface temperature at r + = +1 is negligibly small. Therefore √

1 1 Δϑ+ r+ = 1, t+ = erfc √ − exp 2Bi + Bi2 t+ erfc √ + Bi t+ t+ t+

174

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

has to be suﬃciently small. An asymptotic expansion of this expression for t+ → 0 gives +√

e−1/t t+

3

t+ √ Δϑ+ 1, t+ = 1 − y 3 + t+2 1 − y 5 − . . . (1 − y) − π 2 4 with y = (1 + t+ Bi)−1 . The worst case corresponds to Bi → ∞, therefore y = 0. This yields, for various values of the dimensionless time, the following values for Δϑ+ : t+ Δϑ+

= =

0.05 2.5 · 10−10

0.10 7.7 · 10−6

0.15 2.6 · 10−4

0.20 1.6 · 10−3

0.25 4.6 · 10−3

This means that the solution given in (2.189) is generally applicable to situations where t+ < 0.2.

Fig. 2.32: Temperature proﬁle in a plate from (2.189) for Bi = 2.0 and t+ = 0.25. The dotted lines a and b correspond to the terms in the curly brackets of (2.189)

2.3.5

Cooling and heating in multi-dimensional heat ﬂow

In geometric multi-dimensional heat ﬂow the temperature ﬁelds that have to be calculated depend on two or three spatial coordinates and must satisfy the heat conduction equation ∂ϑ = a∇2ϑ . (2.190) ∂t Here the Laplace operator ∇2 ϑ has the form given in 2.1.2 for cartesian and cylindrical coordinate systems. We will once again consider the transient heat conduction problem solved for the plate, the inﬁnitely long cylinder and the sphere in section 2.3.4: A body with a constant initial temperature ϑ0 is brought into contact with a ﬂuid of constant temperature ϑS = ϑ0 , so that heat transfer takes place between the ﬂuid and the body, whereby the constant heat transfer coeﬃcient α is decisive. In the following section we will consider two solution procedures: – an analytical solution for special body shapes, which is a product of the temperature distributions already calculated in 2.3.4.

2.3 Transient heat conduction

175

– an approximation method for any body shape, which is only adequate for small Biot numbers. The latter of the two methods oﬀers a practical, simple applicable solution to transient heat conduction problems and should always be applied for suﬃciently small Biot numbers. 2.3.5.1

Product solutions

A cylinder of a ﬁnite length is formed by the perpendicular penetration of an inﬁnitely long cylinder with a plate. In the same manner, a very long prism with a rectangular cross section can be formed by the penetration of two plates and a rectangular parallelepiped, by the penetration of three orthogonal plates. The spatial temperature distributions, for heating and cooling of bodies of this type, are products of the geometric one-dimensional temperature distributions in the simple bodies which penetrate perpendicular to each other. So for the parallelepiped with side lengths 2X, 2Y and 2Z, see Fig. 2.33, x at αX y at α Y z at α Z ϑ − ϑS + + + + ϑ = = ϑPl , , , · ϑPl · ϑPl . , , , ϑ0 − ϑS X X2 λ Y Y2 λ Z Z2 λ (2.191) + The solution for the plate ϑ+ is given by (2.171). Here r is replaced by x/X, Pl y/Y or z/Z and equally t+ by at/X 2 , at/Y 2 and at/Z 2 respectively. The Biot number αR/λ has the signiﬁcance as indicated in (2.191). It should be noted that the heat transfer coeﬃcient only has to have the same value on the two surfaces which lie opposite each other. It can therefore assume diﬀerent values α, α and α on the pairs of surfaces perpendicular to the x-, y- or z-directions. The last factor in (2.191) has to be omitted for a prism, which is very long in the z-direction. The

Fig. 2.33: Dimensions of a parallelepiped and a ﬁnite cylinder, with the positions of the coordinate systems for the equations (2.191) and (2.192)

Fig. 2.34: Parallelepiped with adiabatic surface at y = 0 (hatched). On the opposite surface heat transfer with α

176

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

temperature distribution for a cylinder of height 2Z is yielded from the products r at αR z at α Z + · ϑ , (2.192) , , , , ϑ+ = ϑ+ Cy Pl R R2 λ Z Z2 λ where the temperature ϑ+ Cy of the inﬁnitely long cylinder is given by (2.178). The heat transfer coeﬃcient α at the shell can also be diﬀerent from the heat transfer coeﬃcient α on the two ends. If one or two of the parallel ﬂat surfaces of the parallelepiped, prism or cylinder are adiabatically insulated, whilst at the other heat is transferred, the equations given above can also be applied. This entails halving the dimension perpendicular to the adiabatic surface, therefore putting the zero point of the coordinate system into the adiabatic surface. An example of this for a parallelepiped is illustrated in Fig. 2.34. The proof of the correctness of the relationships (2.191) and (2.192) can be found in the book by H.S. Carslaw and J.C. Jaeger [2.1], pp. 33–35. Other product solutions for multi-dimensional temperature ﬁelds using the solutions for the semiinﬁnite solid are possible. References [2.1] and [2.18] give further details. The heat released in multi-dimensional heat conduction can also be determined from of the product solutions. According to section 2.3.4 Q(t) ϑ0 − ϑm (t) + = = 1 − ϑ+ m (t ) , Q0 ϑ0 − ϑS

(2.193)

holds for the heat released up until time t, cf. (2.173). The dimensionless average temperature ϑ+ m is yielded as the product of the average temperatures calculated in 2.3.4.3 for the plate and the inﬁnitely long cylinder. For the parallelepiped we obtain at αX at α Y at α Z + + + , , , ϑ+ · ϑ · ϑ (2.194) m = ϑmPl mPl mPl X2 λ Y2 λ Z2 λ with ϑ+ mPl from (2.174). In the same way we have for the cylinder of ﬁnite length + ϑ+ m = ϑmCy

at αR , R2 λ

· ϑ+ mPl

at α Z , Z2 λ

,

(2.195)

where ϑ+ mCy is given by (2.180).

The equations given here for the temperature distribution and the average temperature are especially easy to evaluate if the dimensionless time t+ is so large, that the solution can be restricted to the ﬁrst term in the inﬁnite series, which + represent the temperature proﬁle ϑ+ Pl in the plate and ϑCy in the long cylinder. The equations introduced in section 2.3.4.5 and Table 2.6 can then be used. The heating or cooling times required to reach a preset temperature ϑk in the centre of the thermally conductive solids handled here can be explicitly calculated when the series are restricted to their ﬁrst terms. Further information is available in [2.37].

2.3 Transient heat conduction

177

Example 2.5: A cylinder of Chromium-Nickel Steel (λ = 15.0 W/K m , c = 510 J/kgK , = 7800 kg/m3 ) with diameter d = 60 mm and length L = 100 mm, whose initial temperature is ϑ0 = 320 ◦ C, is submerged in an oil bath at temperature ϑS = 30 ◦ C. The heat transfer coeﬃcient is α = 450 W/m2 K. How long must the cylinder remain in the oil bath for the temperature at its centre to reach the value ϑk = 70 ◦ C? At this time what is the highest surface temperature of the cylinder? The temperature distribution in a cylinder of ﬁnite length is given by (2.192). In order to explicitly calculate the cooling time tk , we will limit ourselves to the ﬁrst term in each inﬁnite series and then later we will check whether this simpliﬁcation was correct. We therefore put

ϑ+ = CCy J0 (μCy r/R) exp −μ2Cy at/R2 · CPl cos (μPl z/Z) exp −μ2Pl at/Z 2 (2.196) with R = d/2 = 30 mm and Z = L/2 = 50 mm. The eigenvalues μCy , μPl and the coeﬃcients CCy , CPl are dependent on the Biot number. It holds for the cylinder that BiCy = αR/λ = 0.900 , out of which we obtain from Table 2.6 p. 167 the values μCy = 1.20484 and CCy = 1.1902. For the plate BiPl = αZ/λ = 1.500 is obtained and from Table 2.6 μPl = 0.98824 and CPl = 1.1537. The temperature at the centre (r = 0, z = 0) of the cylinder follows from (2.196) as ( ' 2 2 a tk , (2.197) ϑ+ k = CCy CPl exp − (μCy /R) + (μPl /Z) where ϑ+ k can be calculated from the given temperatures: ϑ+ k =

ϑk − ϑS 70 ◦ C − 30 ◦ C = 0.1379 . = ϑ0 − ϑS 320 ◦ C − 30 ◦ C

The cooling time tk we are looking for is found from (2.197) to be tk =

1 ln CCy + ln CPl − ln ϑ+ k . a (μCy /R)2 + (μPl /Z)2

With the thermal diﬀusivity a = λ/c = 3.77 · 10−6 m2 /s this yields tk = 304 s = 5.07 min . In order to check whether it is permissible to truncate the series after the ﬁrst term, we calculate the Fourier numbers using this value of tk : +

tk Cy = a tk /R2 = 1.274 and

t+ k

Pl

= a tk /Z 2 = 0.459 .

According to Fig. 2.31 these dimensionless times are so large that the error caused by neglecting the higher terms in the series is insigniﬁcant. The highest surface temperatures appear either at the cylindrical surface (r = R) for z = 0 or in the middle of the circular end surfaces, i.e. at z = Z and r = 0. For the middle of the cylindrical surface, we get from (2.196) and (2.197) ϑ+ (r = R , z = 0 , t = tk ) = J0 (μCy ) ϑ+ k = 0.6687 · 0.1379 = 0.0922 , which gives ϑ (r = R , z = 0 , t = tk ) = 56.7 ◦ C. It holds for the middle of the end surfaces that ϑ+ (r = 0 , z = Z , t = tk ) = cos (μPl ) ϑ+ k = 0.5502 · 0.1379 = 0.0759 ,

from which we obtain ϑ (r = 0 , z = Z , t = tk ) = 52.0 ◦ C. The highest surface temperature therefore appears on the cylindrical surface at z = 0.

178

2.3.5.2

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Approximation for small Biot numbers

A simple calculation for the heating or cooling of a body of any shape is possible for the limiting case of small Biot numbers (Bi → 0). This condition is satisﬁed when the resistance to heat conduction in the body is much smaller then the heat transfer resistance at its surface, cf. section 2.1.5. At a ﬁxed time, only small temperature diﬀerences appear inside the thermally conductive body, whilst between the surface temperature and that of the surroundings a much larger diﬀerence exists, cf. Fig. 2.5. We simply assume that the temperature of the body is only dependent on time and not on the spatial coordinates. This assumption corresponds to Bi = 0 because λ → ∞, whilst the heat transfer coeﬃcient α = 0. We apply the ﬁrst law of thermodynamics to the body being considered in order to determine the variation of temperature with time. The change in its internal energy is equal to the heat ﬂow across its surface dU = Q˙ . (2.198) dt If a body of volume V has constant material properties and c, then it holds that du dϑ dU =V = V c . dt dt dt With A as the surface area of the body we obtain Q˙ = αA (ϑ − ϑS ) for the heat ﬂow. The diﬀerential equation now follows from (2.198) as αA dϑ = (ϑ − ϑS ) , dt cV with the solution ϑ+ =

ϑ − ϑS αA = exp − t ϑ0 − ϑS cV

(2.199)

which satisﬁes the initial condition ϑ(t = 0) = ϑ0 . This relationship for the temperature change with time is far easier to handle than a series expansion. All the inﬂuencing quantities, such as the heat transfer coeﬃcient, material properties and geometry of the body are combined in one single quantity, the decay time t0 =

c V . α A

For the example of the plate we show that (2.199) corresponds to the exact solution for Bi = 0 with α = 0. We investigate further, for which Biot numbers not equal to zero this simpliﬁed calculation of the temperature change according to (2.199) can be applied to, whilst still obtaining suﬃciently high accuracy.

2.3 Transient heat conduction

179

The temperature distribution in a plate is given by (2.171). For Bi = 0 we obtain, from (2.170), the eigenvalues μ1 = 0, μ2 = π, μ3 = 2π, . . . Thereby for the ﬁrst eigenvalue it holds that μ21 = Bi − Bi2 /3 + . . . , (2.200) which can easily be conﬁrmed by series expansion of tan μ. According to (2.172) all expansion coeﬃcients Ci with i ≥ 2 will be equal to zero, and it holds that C1 = 1. As cos(μ1 r + ) ≡ 1, under consideration of (2.200), we obtain, for the only non-zero term in the inﬁnite series (2.171)

αt ϑ − ϑS . ϑ+ = = exp −Bi t+ = exp − ϑ0 − ϑS cR This agrees with (2.199), because for the plate of thickness 2R, V /A = R. The same method can be used to show that for other shapes of solids (2.199) agrees with the exact solution for Bi = 0, corresponding to λ → ∞, with α = 0. If however, with a ﬁnite value for λ the Biot number would be zero when α = 0, it follows from (2.171) that ϑ+ = 1. The insulated plate keeps its initial temperature ϑ0 , or in other words no equalization of the temperatures ϑ0 and ϑS takes place. The accuracy of the approximation equation (2.199) can be evaluated by comparison with the exact solution for parallelepipeds and prisms with diﬀerent side to length ratios, for the cylinder with various diameter to height ratios as well as for a sphere. Here we can compare the + true average temperature ϑ+ m with the temperature ϑ from (2.199). The diﬀerence + Δϑ+ := ϑ+ m−ϑ

(2.201)

still depends on the time t or t+ . It is however, always positive; due to the assumption of a spatially constant temperature ϑ+ we obtain too high a value for the surface temperature which is decisive for heat transfer. This then causes the calculated heat ﬂow released to the surroundings to be too high and then ϑ+ , the average temperature from the approximate solution (2.199), is less than the true average temperature ϑ+ m for all times. The time dependent diﬀerence Δϑ+ from (2.201) assumes a maximum value Δϑ+ max for each body for a given Biot number, and this maximum appears at a certain time. This maximum deviation of the approximate solution has been calculated for diﬀerent solid shapes. For Bi = 0.1 the maximum diﬀerence lies without exception at less than 2% of the characteristic temperature diﬀerence ϑ0 −ϑS . The Biot number in this case was evaluated with the cylinder or sphere radius R as its characteristic length (Bi = αR/λ). In parallelepipeds and prisms the characteristic length was taken to be half of the smallest side length 2X. In bodies whose dimensions X, Y, Z or R and Z do not diﬀer greatly, the maximum error from the approximation solution lies around 1% of ϑ0 − ϑS . The error increases rapidly with larger Biot numbers. The error of less than 2% of ϑ0 − ϑS calculated for Bi = 0.10 could presumedly be tolerated.

The approximate solution from (2.199) oﬀers a simple and recommended procedure for the calculation of the heating or cooling processes in any solid shape. However it is only suﬃciently accurate for Biot numbers Bi < 0.1. This condition should be checked while choosing the characteristic length for the Biot number to be that of half the shortest length dimension of the body under consideration.

2.3.6

Solidiﬁcation of geometrically simple bodies

Pure substances and eutectic mixtures solidify and melt at deﬁnite temperatures ϑE , which diﬀer from substance to substance and are barely dependent on the

180

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

pressure. The best known example of this is water which at atmospheric pressure, freezes at ϑE = 0 ◦ C. This releases the fusion enthalpy of hE = 333 kJ/kg. When a solid body melts the enthalpy of fusion must be supplied to the solid as heat. Solidifying processes are important in cryogenics, food and process industries and also in metallurgy. A main point of interest is the speed at which the boundary between the solid and the liquid phase moves. From this the time required for solidifying layers of a given thickness can be calculated. The modelling of these processes belongs to the ﬁeld of transient heat conduction, as the enthalpy of fusion released at the phase boundary has to be conducted as heat through the solid. A general mathematical solution for this type of thermal conduction problems does not exist. Special explicit solutions have been found by F. Neumann4 in 1865 and J. Stefan in 1891 [2.39]. In the ﬁrst section we will discuss the solution given by J. Stefan. Quasi-steady solutions will be derived in the section following that. These solutions assume that any heat storage in the solidiﬁed body can be neglected. In the ﬁnal section we will look at the improvements for this quasisteady solution in which the heat stored in the body is considered approximately.

2.3.6.1

The solidiﬁcation of ﬂat layers (Stefan problem)

A solidiﬁed body is maintained by cooling at x = 0 at the constant temperature ϑ0 , which is lower than the solidiﬁcation temperature ϑE , Fig. 2.35. Only onedimensional heat conduction in the x-direction will be assumed. At the phase boundary x = s, which is moving to the right, the solid is touching the liquid which has already been cooled to the solidiﬁcation temperature. By advance of the phase boundary, or in other words by solidifying a layer of thickness ds, the enthalpy of fusion is released and must be conducted as heat to the cooled surface of the solid at x = 0.

Fig. 2.35: Temperature proﬁle (for t = const) for the solidifying of a plane solid. s is the distance between the phase boundary and the cooled surface x = 0

4

F. Neumann presented this solution in his lectures at the University of K¨onigsberg. The ﬁrst time it was published was in a German book: Die partiellen Diﬀerentialgleichungen der Physik, Editors: B. Riemann and H. Weber, Vol.2, pp. 117–121. Braunschweig: F. Vieweg 1912.

2.3 Transient heat conduction

181

The temperature ϑ = ϑ(x, t) in the solidiﬁed body satisﬁes the heat conduction equation ∂ 2ϑ ∂ϑ (2.202) =a 2 ∂t ∂x with the boundary conditions ϑ = ϑ0

for x = 0 , t > 0 ,

(2.203)

ϑ = ϑE

for x = s , t > 0 ,

(2.204)

and as well as the initial condition s = 0 for t = 0 .

(2.205)

At the phase interface, the energy balance λ

∂ϑ dt = hE ds ∂x

has to be satisﬁed, in which hE is the speciﬁc enthalpy of fusion. From this we obtain the advance of the phase boundary with time (solidiﬁcation speed) ds λ ∂ϑ = . (2.206) dt hE ∂x x=s A solution of the heat conduction equation (2.202) is the error function x √ , ϑ = ϑ0 + C erf 2 at cf. 2.3.3.1; it satisﬁes the boundary condition (2.203). The condition (2.204) requires that s √ ϑE = ϑ0 + C erf . 2 at The argument of the error function must therefore be a constant γ independent √ of t. The thickness of the solidiﬁed layer increases proportionally with t, √ s = γ 2 at , (2.207) by which the initial condition (2.205) is also satisﬁed. We obtain with ϑE − ϑ0 = C erf γ the temperature proﬁle in the solidiﬁed layer (x ≤ s) as √

erf x/ 4at ϑ − ϑ0 erf (γx/s) + = = . ϑ := ϑE − ϑ0 erf γ erf γ

(2.208)

182

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

The still unknown constant γ is yielded from the condition (2.206) for the solidiﬁcation speed. It follows from (2.207) that ds a =γ dt t and from (2.206) and (2.208) 2

λ ϑE − ϑ0 e−γ ds = √ √ . dt hE erf γ π at This gives us the transcendental equation independent of t √ c (ϑE − ϑ0 ) 1 2 πγeγ erf γ = = hE Ph

(2.209)

for the determination of γ. This constant is only dependent on the phase transition number 1 hE = , (2.210) P h := c (ϑE − ϑ0 ) St which is the ratio of two speciﬁc energies, the speciﬁc enthalpy of fusion hE and the diﬀerence between the internal energy of the solid at ϑE and at ϑ0 . The reciprocal of P h is also known as the Stefan number St. Using a series expansion of the error function, see, for example [2.28], [2.30], enables us to expand the left hand side of (2.209) into a series which rapidly converges for small values of γ: ∞ % n=0

n+1

(2γ 2 ) 1 = . 1 · 3 · 5 · . . . (2n + 1) Ph

(2.211)

From this equation we get the series 1 1 7 79 (2.212) γ 2 = P h−1 − P h−2 + P h−3 − P h−4 + . . . , 2 6 90 1890 which for large values of the phase transition number allows us to directly calculate γ. Finally the time t required to solidify a plane layer of thickness s is yielded from (2.207) and (2.212) as s2 hE s2 2 16 1 −1 −2 −3 t= = 1 + Ph − Ph + P h − . . . . (2.213) 4aγ 2 2λ (ϑE − ϑ0 ) 3 45 945 The solidiﬁcation time increases with the square of the layer thickness and is larger the smaller the phase transition number P h. Neglecting the heat stored in the solidiﬁed body corresponds, due to c = 0, to the limiting case of P h → ∞. This is the so-called quasi-steady approximation, which gives from (2.213), a solidiﬁcation time t∗ =

hEs2 2λ (ϑE − ϑ0 )

(2.214)

2.3 Transient heat conduction

183

which is always too small. The relative error 1 7 79 t − t∗ = 1 − 2P hγ 2 = P h−1 − P h−2 + P h−3 . . . t 3 45 945

(2.215)

is shown in Fig. 2.36. For P h > 6.2 the error is less than 5%. It increases strongly for smaller phase transition numbers.

Fig. 2.36: Relative error of the solidiﬁcation time t∗ calculated with the quasisteady approximation (2.214)

The problem discussed here was ﬁrst solved by J. Stefan [2.39] in 1891. The solution of the more general problem ﬁrst given by F. Neumann has been discussed at some length by U. Grigull and H. Sandner [2.18]. An initial temperature in the liquid ϑ0F > ϑE is assumed in this case, so that the heat conduction equation must also be solved for the liquid temperature ϑF (x, t). It is assumed that no convection takes place. The solution also contains error functions, whereby the material properties λF , cF and F of the liquid have to be considered. Further analytical solutions of variations of the Stefan-Neumann Problem can be found in H.S. Carslaw and J.C. Jaeger [2.1]. Generalised mathematical formulations and a discussion of further solution methods are contained in the contributions from A.B. Tayler and J.R. Ockendon in [2.40], cf. also [2.41]. 2.3.6.2

The quasi-steady approximation

For suﬃciently large values of the phase transition number P h deﬁned by (2.210), approximately for P h > 7, it is permissible to neglect the storage capability of the solidiﬁed layer. A temperature proﬁle similar to one that would appear in steadystate heat conduction is assumed to exist. This quasi-steady approximation allows boundary conditions diﬀerent from those of the exact solution from F. Neumann and J. Stefan to be assumed at the cooled end of the solid layer. In addition this approach also allows us to investigate solidifying processes in cylindrical and

184

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Fig. 2.37: Temperature proﬁle in the solidiﬁcation of a ﬂat layer under the assumption of the quasi-steady approximation

spherical geometries, for which no exact analytical solutions exist. The equations which follow for the solidiﬁcation-times using the quasi-steady approximation were derived by R. Plank [2.42] and K. Nesselmann [2.43], [2.44]. They are valid due to the large phase transition number for the freezing of ice, and substances containing water, because hE is particularly large for water. We will ﬁrst look at the solidifying process on a ﬂat, cooled wall, as shown in Fig. 2.37. The wall, with thickness δW and thermal conductivity λW will be cooled by a ﬂuid having a temperature ϑ0 , whereby the heat transfer coeﬃcient α is decisive. On the other side of the wall a solidiﬁed layer develops, which at time t has a thickness of s. The liquid is assumed to already be at the solidifying temperature ϑE . During the time interval dt the phase interface moves a distance of ds. This releases the fusion enthalpy dQ = hE A ds which must be transferred as heat through the layer that is already solidiﬁed. In the sense of the quasi-steady approximation, at each time overall heat transfer between the interface (ϑ = ϑE ) and the cooling medium (ϑ = ϑ0) takes place. Then according to section 1.2.1 it holds that dQ = Q˙ dt =

(ϑE − ϑ0 )A dt , δW s 1 + + λ λW α

where λ is the thermal conductivity of the solidiﬁed body. It follows from both equations for dQ that hE λ dt = s+ ds (2.216) λ (ϑE − ϑ0 ) k with

1 1 δW + = . (2.217) k λW α The solidiﬁcation-time for a ﬂat layer of thickness s is found by integrating (2.216) to be hE s2 λ t= 1+2 . (2.218) 2λ (ϑE − ϑ0 ) ks

2.3 Transient heat conduction

185

For k → ∞ the temperature at x = 0 has the value ϑ = ϑ0. This is the boundary condition in the Stefan problem discussed in 2.3.6.1. From (2.218) we obtain the ﬁrst term of the exact solution (2.213), corresponding to P h → ∞, and therefore the time t∗ according to (2.214). With ﬁnite heat transfer resistance (1/k) the solidiﬁcation-time is greater than t∗ ; it no longer increases proportionally to s2 .

Fig. 2.38: Solidiﬁcation on the outside of a tube cooled from the inside, which has an outer radius R (quasisteady approximation)

In the same manner the solidiﬁcation-times for layers on cylindrical (tubes) and spherical surfaces can be calculated. We will derive the result for a layer which develops on the outside of a tube of outer radius R being cooled from the inside, Fig. 2.38. By solidifying a layer of thickness ds, heat dQ = hE 2π(R + s)L ds is released. In this equation L is the length of the tube. For the overall heat transfer dQ = Q˙ dt =

ϑE − ϑ0 dt R+s 1 1 ln + 2πLλ R kA

is valid with

1 1 1 R = + , ln kA 2πLλW R − ΔR 2πL(R − ΔR)α where ΔR is the thickness of the tube wall. It follows that hE R+s dt = + (R + s)β ds (R + s) ln λ (ϑE − ϑ0 ) R

(2.219)

with the abbreviation

R λ λ ln + . (2.220) λW R − ΔR (R − ΔR)α Integration of (2.219) taking account of the initial condition s = 0 for t = 0 yields with β=

s+ = s/R the solidiﬁcation-time t=

hE s2 2λ (ϑE − ϑ0 )

1+

1 s+

2

2 1 ln(1 + s+ ) − 1 + + −β . s 2

(2.221)

The relationships in Table 2.7 were found in the same manner. It should be noted here that R is the radius of the cylindrical or spherical surface on which the solidifying layer develops, cf. Fig. 2.39. At β = 0 the functions f (s+ , β) from Table 2.7 for s+ → 0 assume the limiting value of one. With small layer thicknesses and β = 0 the solidiﬁcation-time increases proportionally to s2 , irrespective of the geometrical shape, which according to (2.218) also holds for a ﬂat layer.

186

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Fig. 2.39: Dimensions for solidiﬁcation on the outside (left hand section) and inside (right hand section) of a tube or a hollow sphere Table 2.7: Equations for the calculation of the solidifying time t for cylindrical and spherical layers of thickness s, see Fig. 2.39. R always indicates the radius of the cylinder or sphere at the side where the solidiﬁed layer develops. ΔR is the thickness of the wall of the cylinder or sphere.

Solidifying time t =

Solidiﬁed Layer Cylinder outside Cylinder inside Sphere outside Sphere inside

2.3.6.3

hE s2 f (s+ , β) 2λ(ϑE − ϑ0 )

f (s+ , β) = 1+

1 s+

1−

1 s+

2

2 1 ln(1 + s+ ) − 1 + + −β s 2

with

s+ = s/R

and

β= R λ λ ln + λW R − ΔR α(R − ΔR)

λ λ 1 2 R + ΔR +β + ln(1 − s+ ) − 1 − + ln s 2 λW R α(R + ΔR) 2 2 2β s+ R λ λ ΔR 1 + s+ + + 1 + s+ + + 3 s 3 λW R − ΔR α(R − ΔR) R − ΔR 2 2 + 2β s+ λ R λ ΔR + 1− s + + 1−s + + 3 s 3 λW R + ΔR α(R + ΔR) R + ΔR 2

Improved approximations

As a comparison with the exact solution of the Stefan problem shows, the quasisteady approximation discussed in the last section only holds for suﬃciently large values of the phase transition number, around P h > 7. There are no exact solutions for solidiﬁcation problems with ﬁnite overall heat transfer resistances to the cooling liquid or for problems involving cylindrical or spherical geometry, and therefore we have to rely on the quasi-steady approximation. An improvement to this approach in which the heat stored in the solidiﬁed layer is at least approximately considered, is desired and was given in diﬀerent investigations. In many cases the temperature proﬁle is replaced by an approximate function, e.g. a second or third degree polynomial. The time dependent coeﬃcient functions of these types of expressions are then ﬁtted to the boundary conditions. The heat conduction equation cannot be exactly, merely approximately satisﬁed. This can occur, according to T.R. Goodman [2.45], by using a heat-balance integral, see also with reference to this subject [2.46] and [2.47]. F. Megerlin [2.48] however recommends that the heat conduction equation be satisﬁed pointwise, namely at the interface x = s. This produces fairly complicated equations for the solidiﬁcation speed ds/dt, the integration of which delivers the solidiﬁcation-time. This integration can often only be carried out numerically, cf. [2.48] and [2.49]. In the procedure of asymptotic approximation no arbitrary approximation functions are

2.3 Transient heat conduction

187

used, instead a series of functions ϑ(x, t) = ϑ0 (x, t) + ϑ1 (x, t) P h−1 + ϑ2 (x, t) P h−2 + . . . is introduced for the temperature in the solidiﬁed layer. This series converges all the better the larger the phase transition number P h. A similar series is used for the solidiﬁcation speed: ds = s0 (t) + s1 (t) P h−1 + s2 (t) P h−2 + . . . dt The functions ϑi (x, t) and si (t) can be recursively determined from the exact formulation of the problem with the heat conduction equation and its associated boundary conditions. Thereby ϑ0 (x, t) and s0 (t) correspond to the quasi-steady approximation with P h → ∞. K. Stephan and B. Holzknecht [2.50] have solved the solidiﬁcation problems dealt with in 2.3.6.2 in this way. Unfortunately the expressions yielded for terms with i ≥ 1 were very complex and this made it very diﬃcult to calculate the solidiﬁcation-time explicitly. K. Stephan and B. Holzknecht therefore derived simpler and rather accurate approximation equations for the solidiﬁcation speed. Finally the numerical solution of solidiﬁcation problems should be mentioned, which due to the moving phase boundary contains additional diﬃculties. As we will not be looking at these solutions in section 2.4, at this point we would suggest the work by K. Stephan and B. Holzknecht [2.51] as well as the contributions from D.R. Atthey, J. Crank and L. Fox in [2.40] as further reading.

2.3.7

Heat sources

Heat sources appear within a heat conducting body as a result of dissipative processes and chemical or nuclear reactions. According to 2.1.2 the diﬀerential equation ˙ (x, t, ϑ) ∂ϑ W = a∇2ϑ + (2.222) ∂t c is valid for the temperature ﬁeld under the assumption that the material properties ˙ (x, t, ϑ) are independent of both temperature and concentration. The function W introduced in section 2.1.1 is the thermal power per volume, originating inside the body due to the processes mentioned above. The solution of the heat conduction ˙ is either independent or only linearly equation (2.222) is, in general, possible if W dependent on the temperature ϑ. The Laplace transformation is the preferred solution method for this linear problem. Alternative methods are given in [2.1], where a large number of solutions for diﬀerent geometries and boundary conditions will be found. In addition the book by H. Tautz [2.26] contains several cases in which the Laplace transformation is used to solve the problem. In the following section we will deal with an example of homogeneous heat sources. The internal heat development is continuously distributed over the whole body. In the section after that we will discuss local heat sources where the heat development is concentrated at a point or a line in the heat conducting body.

188

2.3.7.1

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Homogeneous heat sources

Assuming geometric one-dimensional heat ﬂow in the x-direction and a power ˙ which is independent of temperature, the heat conduction equation is density W then ˙ (x, t) ∂ϑ ∂ 2ϑ W =a 2 + . (2.223) ∂t ∂x c This linear non-homogeneous diﬀerential equation can easily be solved using the Laplace transformation. The steps for the solution of such a problem are shown in the following example. In a semi-inﬁnite body (x ≥ 0), a spatially constant, but time dependent power density is supposed to exist: ˙ (t) = W ˙ 0 t0 /t , t > 0 . W (2.224) ˙ Here W0 represents the power density at time t0 . By using (2.224), a heat release is modelled as it occurs, for example when concrete sets. Then we have an initial large release of heat which rapidly decreases with advancing time. The semi-inﬁnite body initially has the constant (over) temperature ϑ = 0 for t = 0 (2.225) at which the surface x = 0 should always be kept: ϑ(0, t) = 0

for x = 0 .

(2.226)

By applying the Laplace transformation to (2.223) and (2.224) we obtain the non-homogeneous ordinary diﬀerential equation ˙ 0 √πt0 d2 u W 2 √ − p u = − dx2 λ s with p2 = s/a under consideration of the initial condition (2.225). The solution of the homogeneous diﬀerential equation limited for x → ∞ is uhom = C exp(−px). A particular solution for the non-homogeneous equation is ˙ 0 √πt0 ˙ √πt W W √ 2 = 0 3/20 . uinh = λ sp c s The transformed function composed of these two parts u(x, s) = Ce−px +

˙ 0 √πt0 W cs3/2

still has to be ﬁtted to the boundary condition (2.226). This gives ˙ 0√ 1 e−px 1 W √ πt0 − . u(x, s) = c a sp s3/2 The reverse transformation, with the assistance of a correspondence table, Table 2.3, provides us with ˙ 0 √t0 √ √ x W ϑ(x, t) = 2 t 1 − π ierfc √ (2.227) c 2 at with the integrated error function from section 2.3.3.1. Introducing into (2.227) the following dimensionless variables √ ˙ 0 t0 ) , t+ := t/t0 , x+ := x/ at0 , ϑ+ := ϑc/(W

2.3 Transient heat conduction

189

Fig. 2.40: Temperature ﬁeld ϑ+ (x+ , t+ ) according to (2.228) in a semi-inﬁnite body with time dependent homogeneous heat sources according to (2.224) yields

√

√ x+ . ϑ+ x+ , t+ = 2 t+ 1 − π ierfc √ 2 t+

(2.228)

√ This temperature distribution is illustrated in Fig. 2.40. For very small values of x+ /(2 t+ ) it holds that √ √ √ √ π ierfc x+ / 2 t+ = 1 − πx+ / 2 t+ + · · · . Therefore we obtain for t+ → ∞ the straight line √ + ϑ+ πx ∞ = as the steady end temperature. This straight line is simultaneously the tangent to all temperature curves t+ = const at the free surface x+ = 0. This is where the heat ﬂux, constant with respect to time + √ √ ∂ϑ ˙ 0 at0 ∂ϑ ˙ 0 πat0 q˙0 = −λ = −W = −W ∂x x=0 ∂x+ x+ =0 has to be removed in order to maintain the temperature at the value ϑ+ = 0.

˙ (x, t) and boundary conditions Solutions of (2.223) for other power densities W can be found in the same way. However, for bodies of ﬁnite thickness, the inverse transformation of u(x, s) can normally only be carried out using the inversion theorem mentioned in section 2.3.2. For cases such as these see [2.1] and the detailed examples discussed in [2.26]. 2.3.7.2

Point and linear heat sources

If the generation of heat is concentrated in a small, limited space we speak of local heat sources, which can be idealised as point, line or sheet singularities. For example, an electrically heated thin wire can be treated as a linear heat source. Alongside such technical applications these singularities have signiﬁcant theoretical importance in the calculation of temperature ﬁelds, cf. [2.1].

190

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

The calculation of the temperature ﬁeld produced when a point heat source exists will now be explained. We will consider a body which extends inﬁnitely in all directions, with a spherical hollow space of radius R inside it, Fig. 2.41. At the surface of the sphere the boundary condition of a spatially constant heat ﬂux q˙0 = q˙0 (t) is stipulated. This corresponds to a heat source within the hollow space with a thermal power (yield) of Q˙ = 4πR2 q˙0 . The limit R → 0 at a given time t, keeping Q˙ constant, leads to a point heat source ˙ of strength Q(t), which is located at the centre of the sphere which is taken to be the origin r = 0 of the radial (spherical) coordinate.

Fig. 2.41: Inﬁnite body with respect to all dimensions with a spherical hollow space at whose surface the heat ﬂux q˙0 is prescribed

The temperature ﬁeld outside the spherical hollow satisﬁes the diﬀerential equation 2 ∂ϑ ∂ ϑ 2 ∂ϑ + =a ∂t ∂r 2 r ∂r with boundary conditions −λ

˙ Q(t) ∂ϑ = q˙0 = ∂r 4πR2

for r = R

and ϑ=0

for r → ∞ ,

if we assume the initial temperature to be ϑ = 0. Applying the Laplace transformation leads to d2 u 2 du + − p2 u = 0 dr2 r dr with p2 = s/a. The boundary conditions are ' ( 1 du ˙ =− L Q(t) dr 4πR2 λ

for r = R

and u → 0 for r → ∞. A solution which satisﬁes the last condition is u=

B −pr e . r

The constant B is obtained from (2.229), so that ' ( ˙ L Q(t) e−p(r−R) u= 4πλr 1 + pR

(2.229)

2.3 Transient heat conduction

191

is the desired transformed function. Letting R → 0 we obtain for the point heat source at r = 0 ' ( ˙ L Q(t) u= e−pr . 4πλr From No. 4 in Table 2.3 on page 147 e−pr = L

"

2 r √ e−r /4at 2 aπt3/2

# ,

such that u is obtained as the product of two Laplace transforms 2 ' ( 1 e−r /4at ˙ √ 2/3 . u= L Q(t) ·L 4πλ 2 aπt Which, according to the convolution theorem, No. 6 in Table 2.2 on page 145, is ⎫ ⎧ τ =t

⎬ ⎨ exp −r 2 /4a(t − τ ) 1 ˙ √ . dτ L u= Q(τ ) ⎭ 4πλ ⎩ 2 aπ(t − τ )3/2 τ =0

So the temperature distribution around a point heat source at r = 0, which, ˙ at time t = 0 is “switched on” with a thermal power of Q(t), is yielded to be 1 ϑ(r, t) = (4πa)3/2 c

t ˙ ) exp Q(τ 0

−r2 4a (t − τ )

dτ . (t − τ )3/2

(2.230)

˙ This general solution for any time function Q(t) contains special simple cases. ˙ The temperature ﬁeld for a source of constant thermal power Q(t) = Q˙ 0 is found to be Q˙ 0 r ϑ(r, t) = erfc √ . (2.231) 4πλr 4at For t → ∞ we obtain, with erfc(0) = 1, the steady-state temperature ﬁeld around a point heat source as Q˙ 0 ϑ(r) = . 4πλr A very fast reaction or an electrical short can cause a sudden release of energy Q0 at time t = 0 in a small space at r = 0. For this “heat explosion” the limit in (2.230) is set as τ → 0 and the heat released is given by τ ˙ ) dτ . Q(τ

Q0 = lim

τ →0 0

This then gives

Q0 r2 ϑ(r, t) = (2.232) exp − (4πat)3/2 c 4at as the temperature distribution. It has the boundary value of ϑ → ∞ for t = 0 and r = 0. At a ﬁxed point r = const, where r = 0 the temperature change with

192

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Fig. 2.42: Temperature ﬁeld from (2.232) in an inﬁnite body after a “heat explosion” at r = 0. The reference temperature is ϑ0 = Q0 /(cr03 ) with r0 as an arbitrarily selected distance from r = 0

time begins with ϑ = 0, goes through a maximum at time tmax = r2 /(6a) and falls once again back to ϑ = 0. The temperature proﬁle over time for diﬀerent ratios of r/r0 , according to (2.232) is shown in Fig. 2.42 We will also start from this “heat explosion” for the calculation of the temperature ﬁeld around a linear heat source at r = 0. At time t = 0, heat Q0 is released by a linear heat source of length L (perpendicular to the r, ϕ–plane of the polar coordinate system). As no other heat sources are present, at every later time the heat Q0 has to be found as an increase in the internal energy of the environment of the heat source. Therefore the balance Q0 =

∞ ∞ 2πrLc ϑ(r, t) dr = 2πLc rϑ(r, t) dr 0

0

holds, independent of time t. The desired temperature distribution ϑ(r, t), must satisfy this equation. In analogy to the point “heat explosion” we introduce the function r2 ϑ(r, t) = f (t) exp − 4at corresponding to (2.232) and obtain ∞ r2 Q0 = 2πLcf (t) r exp − dr . 4at 0

2.3 Transient heat conduction

193

√ With ξ = r/ 4at this becomes ∞ 2 Q0 = 2πLcf (t)4at ξe−ξ dξ . 0

The deﬁnite integral which appears here has the value of 1/2, such that the time function f (t) is yielded to be f (t) =

Q0 /L Q0 /L = . 4πcat 4πλt

From this we obtain the desired temperature distribution Q0 /L r2 ϑ(r, t) = . exp − 4πλt 4at

(2.233)

It is easy to prove that this satisﬁes the heat conduction equation (2.157) with n = 1 (cylindrical coordinates). This result can then be generalised for a linear source at r = 0 with time ˙ dependent thermal power Q(t). During the time interval from t = τ to t = τ + dτ ˙ ) dτ thereby generating a temperature ﬁeld corresponding to it releases heat Q(τ (2.233). By superimposing these small “heat explosions” over time the following temperature ﬁeld, analogous to (2.230), is obtained: 1 ϑ(r, t) = 4πλL

τ =t ˙ ) exp − Q(τ τ =0

r2 4a(t − τ )

dτ . t−τ

For the special case of constant thermal power Q˙ 0 this becomes Q˙ 0 r2 ϑ(r, t) = − . Ei − 4πλL 4at

(2.234)

(2.235)

The function which is present here is known as the exponential integral ∞ −u e du Ei(−ξ) = u ξ

with the series expansion Ei(−ξ) = 0.577216 + ln ξ +

∞ % ξn (−1)n n · n! n=1

and the asymptotic expansion (ξ 1) e−ξ 3! 1! 2! Ei(−ξ) = , 1− + 2 − 3 +··· −ξ ξ ξ ξ cf. [2.28] and [2.30]. Some values of Ei(−ξ), which is always negative, are given in Table 2.8.

194

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Table 2.8: Values of the exponential integral Ei(−ξ) ξ

−Ei(−ξ)

ξ

−Ei(−ξ)

ξ

−Ei(−ξ)

ξ

−Ei(−ξ)

ξ

−Ei(−ξ)

0 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.10

∞ 4.0379 3.3547 2.4679 1.8229

0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35

1.4645 1.2227 1.0443 0.9057 0.7942

0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

0.7024 0.5598 0.4544 0.3738 0.3106

0.9 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

0.2602 0.2194 0.1000 0.0489 0.0249

3.0 3.5 4.0 5.0 6.0

0.01305 0.00697 0.00378 0.00115 0.00036

2.4

Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with diﬀerence methods

Complicated heat conduction problems, for which no explicit solutions exist or can only be obtained with great eﬀort, are preferentially solved using numerical methods. Problems with temperature dependent material properties, complex geometrical forms and those with particular boundary conditions, for example temperature dependent heat transfer coeﬃcients, all belong in this group. However, despite the use of computers, numerical solution methods often demand a great deal of programming, which should not be underestimated. The decision to use a numerical solution procedure should therefore be carefully considered, particularly if simpliﬁcations of the problem are acceptable, which would then lead to an analytical solution. Two methods are available for the numerical solution of initial-boundary-value problems, the ﬁnite diﬀerence method and the ﬁnite element method. Finite difference methods are easy to handle and require little mathematical eﬀort. In contrast the ﬁnite element method, which is principally applied in solid and structure mechanics, has much higher mathematical demands, it is however very ﬂexible. In particular, for complicated geometries it can be well suited to the problem, and for such cases should always be used in preference to the ﬁnite diﬀerence method. After an introductory illustration of the diﬀerence method, which can be recommended even to beginners as a good tool for solving heat conduction problems, we will present an introduction into the method of ﬁnite elements. It shall familiarise the beginner with the method in such a way that he will be able to solve basic problems by himself. For the solution of more complicated problems it is advisable to make use of one of the many programs available either commercially or in internet. The knowledge about ﬁnite elements acquired in chapter 2.5 will help the user to become acquainted with these programs and to utilise them.

2.4 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with diﬀerence methods

2.4.1

195

The simple, explicit diﬀerence method for transient heat conduction problems

In the ﬁnite diﬀerence method, the derivatives ∂ϑ/∂t, ∂ϑ/∂x and ∂ 2 ϑ/∂x2 , which appear in the heat conduction equation and the boundary conditions, are replaced by diﬀerence quotients. This discretisation transforms the diﬀerential equation into a ﬁnite diﬀerence equation whose solution approximates the solution of the diﬀerential equation at discrete points which form a grid in space and time. A reduction in the mesh size increases the number of grid points and therefore the accuracy of the approximation, although this does of course increase the computation demands. Applying a ﬁnite diﬀerence method one has therefore to make a compromise between accuracy and computation time. 2.4.1.1

The ﬁnite diﬀerence equation

For the introduction and explanation of the method we will discuss the case of transient, geometric one-dimensional heat conduction with constant material properties. In the region x0 ≤ x ≤ xn the heat conduction equation ∂ 2ϑ ∂ϑ =a 2 (2.236) ∂t ∂x has to be solved for times t ≥ t0, whilst considering the boundary conditions at x0 and xn . The initial temperature distribution ϑ0 (x) for t = t0 is given. A grid is established along the strip x0 ≤ x ≤ xn , t ≥ t0, with mesh size Δx in the x-direction and Δt in the t-direction, Fig. 2.43. A grid point (i, k) has the coordinates xi = x0 + iΔx with i = 0, 1, 2, . . . and tk = t0 + kΔt with k = 0, 1, 2, . . . The approximation value of ϑ at grid point (i, k) is indicated by ϑki = ϑ(xi , tk ) .

Fig. 2.43: Grid for the discretisation of the heat conduction equation (2.236) and to illustrate the ﬁnite diﬀerence equation (2.240)

(2.237)

196

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

We refrain from indicating the approximation value of the temperature by a different symbol to the exact temperature, e.g. Θ instead of ϑ, as is usually the case in mathematics literature. The time level tk is indicated by the superscript k without brackets because there is no danger of it being confused with the k-th power of ϑ. The derivatives which appear in (2.236) are replaced by diﬀerence quotients, whereby a discretisation error has to be taken into account derivative = diﬀerence quotient + discretisation error . The discretisation error goes to zero with a reduction in the mesh size Δx or Δt. The second derivative in the x-direction at position xi at time tk is replaced by the central second diﬀerence quotient 2 k

ϑki−1 − 2ϑki + ϑki+1 ∂ ϑ (2.238) = + O Δx2 . 2 2 ∂x i Δx The writing of O (Δx2 ) indicates that the discretisation error is proportional to Δx2 and therefore by reducing the mesh size the error approaches zero with the square of the mesh size. The ﬁrst derivative with respect to time is replaced by the relatively inaccurate forward diﬀerence quotient k ϑk+1 − ϑki ∂ϑ = i + O(Δt) . (2.239) ∂t i Δt Its discretisation error only approaches zero proportionally to Δt. However with (2.239) a numerically simple, explicit ﬁnite diﬀerence formula is obtained. Putting (2.238) and (2.239) into the diﬀerential equation (2.236) gives, after a simple rearrangement, the ﬁnite diﬀerence equation ϑk+1 = M ϑki−1 + (1 − 2M ) ϑki + M ϑki+1 i

(2.240)

M := aΔt/Δx2

(2.241)

with as the modulus or Fourier number of the diﬀerence method. The discretisation error of the diﬀerence equation is, due to Δt = M Δx2 /a, of order O(Δx2). Equation (2.240) is an explicit diﬀerence formula; it allows, from three known temperatures of the time level t = tk the temperatures ϑk+1 of the next time i level tk+1 = tk + Δt to be explicitly calculated, cf. Figure 2.43. For k = 0, and therefore t = t0 , all the temperatures ϑ0i are known from the given initial temperature proﬁle. Equation (2.240) enables all ϑ1i at time t1 to be calculated and from these the values for ϑ2i at time t2 , etc. The equations (2.238) and (2.239) for the replacement of the derivatives with diﬀerence quotients can be derived using a Taylor series expansion of the temperature ﬁeld around the point (xi , tk ), cf. [2.52] and [2.72]. It is also possible to derive the ﬁnite diﬀerence formula(2.240) from an energy balance in conjunction with Fourier’s law, cf. [2.53]. This requires the introduction

2.4 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with diﬀerence methods

197

of the heat conduction resistances Δx/λ between the grid points and the consideration of the energy storage in a “block” around the position xi . A further development of this method is the Volume Integral Method, with which various ﬁnite diﬀerence equations can be derived, cf. [2.54].

2.4.1.2

The stability condition

Many ﬁnite diﬀerence formulae have the undesirable property that small initial and rounding errors become larger as the calculation proceeds, which in the end produces a false result. This phenomenon is called (numerical) instability. In contrast a diﬀerence formula is stable when the errors become smaller during the calculation run and therefore their eﬀect on the result declines. Most diﬀerence equations are only conditionally stable, that is they are stable for certain step or mesh sizes. The explicit equation (2.240) belongs to this group, as it is only stable when the modulus M satisﬁes the condition M = aΔt/Δx2 ≤

1 . 2

(2.242)

When Δx is given, the size of the time step Δt cannot be chosen at will, because violation of (2.242) will not just make the process inaccurate, it will be rendered completely useless. The stability condition (2.242) can be derived in a number of ways; cf. the extensive discussion in [2.52]. A general condition for stability of explicit diﬀerence formulae is the requirement that no coeﬃcient in such an equation is negative, cf. [2.55]. This means for (2.240) 1 − 2M ≥ 0 , from which (2.242) immediately follows. The so-called ε-scheme is used to clarify stability behaviour. For t = t0 we set all ϑ0i = 0 except for one value which is set to ε = 0. The error propagation is followed by applying the diﬀerence formula for further time steps with k = 1, 2, . . . The ε-scheme for the diﬀerence equation (2.240) has the following appearance for M = 1/2 (stability limit): ε-scheme for M = 1/2 k k k k k

=0: 0 =1: 0 =2: 0 =3: 0 = 4 : 0.0625ε

0 0 0 0.125ε 0

0 0 0.25ε 0 0.25ε

0 0.5ε 0 0.375ε 0

ε 0 0.5ε 0 0.375ε

0 0.5ε 0 0.375ε 0

0 0 0.25ε 0 0.25ε

0 0 0 0.125ε 0

0 0 0 0 0.0625ε

The ﬁnite diﬀerence formula with M = 1/2 is just about stable, the error is shared between two neighbouring points and slowly declines. In addition the grid divides into two grid sections which are not connected, as in the diﬀerence formula

1 1 k ϑk+1 , M= = ϑi−1 + ϑki+1 , (2.243) i 2 2 ; ϑki has no inﬂuence on only two temperatures at time tk , determine the new temperature ϑk+1 i ϑk+1 . A loose connection of the two grid sections exists only because the temperatures at the i

198

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

boundaries are given. Therefore, it is not recommended that (2.240) is used with M = 1/2, even though this allows the largest time step Δt. The diﬀerence equation (2.243) is the basis for the previously most frequently used graphical methods from L. Binder [2.56] and E. Schmidt [2.57]. As a result of the advances in computer technology, these clear but somewhat inaccurate and time-consuming graphical procedures have lost their former importance. We will not discuss these graphical methods any further, information is available in [2.58] and [2.59]. The instability of the ﬁnite diﬀerence formula (2.240) for M > 1/2 is illustrated by the ε-scheme for M = 1: ε-scheme for M = 1 k k k k k

=0: =1: =2: =3: =4:

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ε ε −4ε

0 0 0 ε ε −2ε −3ε 6ε 7ε −16ε

ε −ε 3ε −7ε 19ε

0 ε −2ε 6ε −16ε

0 0 ε −3ε 7ε

0 0 0 0 0 0 ε 0 −4ε ε

An error becomes greater with every time step, such that the solution of the diﬀerence equation does not correspond to the solution of the diﬀerential equation as the stability condition has been violated.

2.4.1.3

Heat sources

The ﬁnite diﬀerence equation (2.240) can easily be extended to cases where heat sources are present. The diﬀerential equation from 2.1.2 is valid: ˙ (x, t, ϑ) ∂ 2ϑ W ∂ϑ =a 2 + . ∂t ∂x c

(2.244)

Its discretisation with the diﬀerence quotients according to (2.238) and (2.239) leads to the explicit ﬁnite diﬀerence formula

k ˙i . ϑk+1 = M ϑki−1 + (1 − 2M ) ϑki + M ϑki+1 + M Δx2 /λ W i Here

˙ xi , tk , ϑk ˙ k=W W i i

(2.245)

(2.246)

indicates the value of the power density at xi at time tk . Equation (2.245) can also be used when the power density depends on the temperature. The temperature ϑki which appears in (2.246) is known from the calculation of the temperature ﬁeld at time tk . A strong temperature dependence ˙ can fundamentally inﬂuence the stability behaviour. Reference [2.52] shows of W ˙ depends linearly on the that the stability condition (2.242) holds unaltered if W temperature ϑ.

2.4 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with diﬀerence methods

2.4.2

199

Discretisation of the boundary conditions

Considering the boundary conditions in ﬁnite diﬀerence methods we will distinguish three diﬀerent cases: – prescribed boundary temperatures – preset heat ﬂux at the boundary and – the heat transfer condition, cf. section 2.1.3. If the temperature at the boundary x = xR is given, then the grid divisions should be chosen such that the boundary coincides with a grid line xi = const. The left hand boundary is then xR = x0 with the right hand boundary xR = xn+1 = x0 +(n + 1) Δx. The given temperature ϑ (xR, tk ) is used as the temperature value ϑk0 or ϑkn+1 in the diﬀerence equation (2.240). With given heat ﬂux q(t) ˙ the condition −λ

∂ϑ ∂n

= q(t) ˙

(2.247)

x=xR

has to be satisﬁed at the boundary. The derivative must be formed in the outward normal direction, and the heat ﬂux q˙ is positive if it ﬂows in this direction. The grid will now be established such that the boundary lies between two grid lines. This gives, for the left hand boundary xR = x0 + Δx/2, see Fig. 2.44. This means that grid points (0, k) are introduced outside the thermally conductive body. The temperatures ϑk0 which are present here serve only as calculated values to fulﬁll the boundary condition (2.247).

Fig. 2.44: Consideration of the boundary conditions (2.247) at xR = x0 + Δx/2 by means of the introduction of temperatures ϑk0 outside the body

The local derivative which appears in (2.247) is replaced by the rather exact central diﬀerence quotient. It holds at the left hand boundary that −

∂ϑ ∂n

= x0 +Δx/2

∂ϑ ∂x

k = 1 2

ϑk1 − ϑk0 + O Δx2 . Δx

(2.248)

Then from (2.247) we obtain ϑk0 = ϑk1 −

Δx q(t ˙ k) . λ

(2.249)

200

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

At x = x1 the diﬀerence equation (2.240) with i = 1 holds: = M ϑk0 + (1 − 2M ) ϑk1 + M ϑk2 . ϑk+1 1

(2.250)

Elimination of ϑk0 from both these equations yields ϑk+1 = (1 − M ) ϑk1 + M ϑk2 − M 1

Δx q(t ˙ k) . λ

(2.251)

This equation replaces (2.250), when the boundary condition (2.247) is to be satisﬁed at the left hand boundary. If (2.247) is to be satisﬁed at the right hand boundary, then the grid is chosen such that xR = xn + Δx/2 is valid. The elimination of ϑkn+1 from the diﬀerence equation which holds for xn , and from the boundary condition, yields ϑk+1 = M ϑkn−1 + (1 − M ) ϑkn + M n

Δx q(t ˙ k) . λ

(2.252)

As in (2.251), q(t ˙ k ) will also be positive when the heat ﬂux is out of the body. The diﬀerence equations (2.251) and (2.252) are valid, with q˙ ≡ 0, for an adiabatic boundary. Adiabatic boundaries are also the planes of symmetry inside the body. In this case the grid is chosen such that the adiabatic plane of symmetry lies between two neighbouring grid lines. The calculation of the temperatures can then be limited to one half of the body. If heat is transferred at the boundary to a ﬂuid at temperature ϑS, where the heat transfer coeﬃcient α is given, then the heat transfer condition is valid −λ

∂ϑ = α (ϑ − ϑS ) ∂n

for x = xR .

(2.253)

The derivative is formed in the outward normal direction, and α and ϑS can be dependent on time. For the discretisation of (2.253) it is most convenient if the boundary coincides with a grid line, Fig. 2.45, as the boundary temperature which appears in (2.253) can immediately be used in the diﬀerence formula. The replacement of the derivative ∂ϑ/∂n by the central diﬀerence quotient requires grid points outside the body, namely the temperatures ϑk0 or ϑkn+1 , which, in conjunction with the boundary condition, can be eliminated from the diﬀerence equations. At the left hand boundary (xR = x1 ) the outward normal to the surface points in the negative x-direction. Therefore from (2.253) it follows that ∂ϑ α = (ϑ − ϑS ) ∂x λ

for x = x1 .

2.4 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with diﬀerence methods

201

Fig. 2.45: Consideration of the heat transfer condition (2.253), a at the left hand boundary xR = x1 , b at the right hand boundary xR = xn

Replacing with the central diﬀerence quotient, k

∂ϑ ϑk − ϑk0 = 2 + O Δx2 , ∂x 1 2Δx gives

ϑk0 = ϑk2 − 2Bi∗ ϑk1 − ϑkS

(2.254)

Bi∗ = αΔx/λ

(2.255)

with as the Biot number of the ﬁnite diﬀerence method. Using (2.254), the temperature ϑk0 is eliminated from the diﬀerence equation (2.250), which assumes the form ϑk+1 = [1 − 2M (1 + Bi∗ )] ϑk1 + 2M ϑk2 + 2M Bi∗ ϑkS . 1

(2.256)

At the right hand boundary (xR = xn ), we obtain from (2.253) the boundary condition α ∂ϑ = (ϑ − ϑS ) . − ∂x λ Its discretisation leads to an equation analogous to (2.254)

ϑkn+1 = ϑkn−1 − 2Bi∗ ϑkn − ϑkS . (2.257) This is then used to eliminate ϑkn+1 from the diﬀerence equation valid for xn , which then has the form ϑk+1 = 2M ϑkn−1 + [1 − 2M (1 + Bi∗ )] ϑkn + 2M Bi∗ ϑkS . n

(2.258)

The consideration of the heat transfer condition (2.253) detoriates the stability behaviour of the explicit diﬀerence formula. As the coeﬃcients of the explicit diﬀerence equations (2.256) and (2.258) must be positive in order to guarantee stability, we obtain the stability condition M≤

1 . 2 (1 + Bi∗ )

(2.259)

This tightens the condition (2.242) and leads to even smaller time steps Δt.

202

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

In the consideration of the heat transfer condition (2.253) a choice of grid diﬀerent to that shown in Fig. 2.45 is frequently made. The grid is laid out according to Fig. 2.44 with the derivative ∂ϑ/∂x at xR = x0 + Δx/2 being replaced by the central diﬀerence quotient from (2.248). The boundary temperature ϑ (xR , tk ) is found using the approximation ϑ (xR , tk ) = ϑk1/2 =

1 k ϑ + ϑk1 . 2 0

(2.260)

This then gives us the relationship from (2.253) ϑk0 =

2 − Bi∗ k 2Bi∗ ϑ + ϑk , 2 + Bi∗ 1 2 + Bi∗ S

which, with (2.250), leads to the diﬀerence formula 2 + 3Bi∗ 2M Bi∗ k ϑk+1 ϑk1 + M ϑk2 + = 1 − M ϑ . 1 ∗ 2 + Bi 2 + Bi∗ S

(2.261)

(2.262)

The discretisation error of this equation is O(Δx) and not O(Δx2 ) as for (2.256), because the approximation (2.260) was used. The use of (2.262) therefore leads us to expect larger errors than those with (2.256). On the other hand, the stability behaviour is better. Instead of (2.259) the condition 2 + Bi∗ M≤ (2.263) 2 + 3Bi∗ is valid, which for large values of Bi∗ delivers the limiting value M = 1/3, against which (2.259) leads to M → 0. If the larger discretisation error of (2.262) is to be avoided, the boundary temperature ϑk1/2 has to be replaced by a more accurate expression than the simple arithmetic mean according to (2.260). A parabolic curve through the three temperatures ϑk0 , ϑk1 and ϑk2 gives ϑk1/2 =

1 k 3ϑ0 + 6ϑk1 − ϑk2 . 8

From which, instead of (2.261) we get ϑk0 =

8 − 6Bi∗ k Bi∗ 8Bi∗ ϑ + ϑk + ϑk 8 + 3Bi∗ 1 8 + 3Bi∗ 2 8 + 3Bi∗ S

and from (2.250) the diﬀerence equation 2 + 3Bi∗ 8 + 4Bi∗ k 8M Bi∗ k ϑk1 + M = 1 − 4M ϑ2 + ϑ ϑk+1 1 ∗ ∗ 8 + 3Bi 8 + 3Bi 8 + 3Bi∗ S

(2.264)

is obtained. Although this equation for the consideration of the boundary condition (2.250) is numerically more complex it is also more exact than (2.262), because its discretisation error is O(Δx2 ). The resulting stability condition is M≤

1 8 + 3Bi∗ . 4 2 + 3Bi∗

(2.265)

This only leads to a tightening of the stability condition (2.242) for Bi∗ ≥ 4/3 and for very large Bi∗ yields the limiting value M ≤ 1/4. With small values of Bi∗ the simple relationship (2.256) with a grid laid out according to Fig. 2.45 a delivers very accurate results. In contrast for large Bi∗ values, (2.264) should be used with a grid according to that in Fig. 2.44, where the stability condition (2.265) has to be observed.

2.4 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with diﬀerence methods

203

Example 2.6: A steel plate with the material properties λ = 15.0 W/K m and a = 3.75 · 10−6 m2 /s is 2δ = 270 mm thick and has a constant initial temperature ϑ0 . At time t0 the plate is brought into contact with a ﬂuid which has a temperature ϑS < ϑ0 that is constant with respect to time. The heat transfer coeﬃcient at both surfaces of the plate is 2 α = 75 W/m K. The temperatures during the cooling of the plate are to be numerically determined. Simple initial and boundary conditions were intentionally chosen, so that the accuracy of the ﬁnite diﬀerence method could be checked when compared to the explicit solution of the case dealt with in section 2.3.3. Due to symmetry, it is suﬃcient to consider only one half of the plate which is δ = 135 mm thick. Its left hand surface can be taken to be adiabatic, whilst heat is transferred to the ﬂuid at its right hand surface. We choose the grid from Fig. 2.46 with a mesh size of Δx = 30 mm. The left boundary of the plate lies in the middle of the two grid lines x0 and

Fig. 2.46: Grid division for the calculation of the cooling of a plate of thickness 2δ

x1 = x0 + Δx; the right boundary coincides with x5 . The Biot number of the diﬀerence method is 2 75 W/m K 0.030 m αΔx ∗ Bi = = = 0.15 . λ 15.0 W/K m For the modulus we choose M = aΔt/Δx2 = 1/3 , which satisﬁes the stability condition (2.259). The time step will be Δt =

Δx2 M = 80 s . a

We set ϑS = 0 and ϑ0 = 1.0000. The temperatures ϑki calculated agree with the dimensionless temperatures ϑ+ (xi , tk ) in the explicit solution from (2.171). With these arrangements the ﬁve following diﬀerence equations are valid: = ϑk+1 1

2 k 1 k ϑ + ϑ 3 1 3 2

according to (2.251) with q(t ˙ k ) = 0, ϑk+1 = i

1 k + ϑki + ϑki+1 ϑ 3 i−1

for i = 2, 3, 4 according to (2.240) as well as = ϑk+1 5 from (2.258).

2 k ϑ + 0.2333 ϑk5 3 4

204

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

The results for the ﬁrst 12 time steps are shown in Table 2.9. In Table 2.10 the surface temperatures ϑk5 and the temperature proﬁle at time t12 = 960 s are compared with the exact solution.

Table 2.9: Temperatures in the cooling of a steel plate, calculated with the explicit diﬀerence method. k

tk /s

ϑk1

ϑk2

ϑk3

ϑk4

ϑk5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

0 80 160 240 320 400 480 560 640 720 800 880 960

1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9988 0.9964 0.9930 0.9887 0.9836 0.9779 0.9717 0.9651

1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9963 0.9917 0.9861 0.9800 0.9734 0.9664 0.9592 0.9518 0.9442

1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9889 0.9789 0.9679 0.9574 0.9471 0.9372 0.9276 0.9182 0.9091 0.9003

1.0000 1.0000 0.9667 0.9478 0.9286 0.9125 0.8977 0.8844 0.8721 0.8607 0.8500 0.8399 0.8303

1.0000 0.9000 0.8767 0.8490 0.8300 0.8127 0.7980 0.7847 0.7727 0.7617 0.7515 0.7420 0.7331

Table 2.10: Comparison of the surface temperature ϑk5 and the temperatures ϑ12 i calculated using the diﬀerence method with the values of ϑ+ from the exact solution according to (2.171). k

ϑk5

ϑ+ (x5 , tk )

k

ϑk5

ϑ+ (x5 , tk )

k

ϑk5

ϑ+ (x5 , tk )

1 2 3 4

0.9000 0.8767 0.8490 0.8300

0.9093 0.8755 0.8509 0.8311

5 6 7 8

0.8127 0.7980 0.7847 0.7727

0.8142 0.7994 0.7861 0.7741

9 10 11 12

0.7617 0.7515 0.7420 0.7331

0.7631 0.7529 0.7433 0.7343

i ϑ12 i +

ϑ (xi , t12 )

1

2

3

4

5

0.9651 0.9629

0.9442 0.9427

0.9003 0.8998

0.8303 0.8309

0.7331 0.7343

Although the grid chosen was coarse the agreement with the explicit solution from (2.171) is satisfactory. However the ﬁrst 12 time steps record only a small part of the cooling process. This is due to the restriction of the time step Δt in the stability condition. This can only be overcome by transferring to an implicit diﬀerence method.

2.4 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with diﬀerence methods

2.4.3

205

The implicit diﬀerence method from J. Crank and P. Nicolson

The explicit diﬀerence method discussed in 2.4.1 has the disadvantage that the time step Δt is limited by the stability conditions (2.242) and (2.259). Therefore obtaining a temperature proﬁle at a given time usually requires a lot of time steps. This step size restriction can be avoided by choosing an implicit diﬀerence method. It requires a system of linear equations to be solved for each time step. This system has a very simple form, it is a tridiagonal system whose coeﬃcient matrix is only occupied along the main diagonal and both its neighbours. Simple solution algorithms for tridiagonal systems can be found in D. Marsal [2.72] and also in the standard works on numerical mathematics, e.g. [2.61], [2.62] and [2.63]. A particularly accurate implicit diﬀerence method, which is always stable, has been presented by J. Crank and P. Nicolson [2.60]. In this method the temperatures at the time levels tk and tk+1 are used. However the diﬀerential equation (2.236) is discretised for the time lying between these two levels: tk + Δt/2. This k+1/2 by means of the makes it possible to approximate the derivative (∂ϑ/∂t)i accurate central diﬀerence quotient k+ 12

ϑk+1 − ϑki ∂ϑ = i + O Δt2 . (2.266) ∂t i Δt This is advantageous because the choice of an implicit diﬀerence method allows larger time steps to be used and therefore requires a more exact approximation of the derivative with respect of time. k+1/2 The second derivative (∂ 2 ϑ/∂x2 )i at time tk + Δt/2 is replaced by the arithmetic mean of the second central diﬀerence quotients at times tk and tk+1 . This produces 2 k+ 12 k+1

+ ϑk+1 ϑki−1 − 2ϑki + ϑki+1 ∂ ϑ 1 ϑk+1 i−1 − 2ϑi i+1 + O Δx2 . = + 2 2 2 ∂x i 2 Δx Δx (2.267) With (2.266) and (2.267) the implicit diﬀerence equation is obtained k+1 k k k − M ϑk+1 − M ϑk+1 i−1 + (2 + 2M ) ϑi i+1 = M ϑi−1 + (2 − 2M ) ϑi + M ϑi+1 (2.268)

with M = aΔt/Δx2 . The temperatures at time tk on the right hand side of (2.268) are known; the three unknown temperatures at time tk+1 on the left hand side have to be calculated. The diﬀerence equation (2.268) yields a system of linear equations with i = 1, 2, . . . n. The main diagonal of the coeﬃcient matrix contains the elements (2 + 2M ); the sub- and superdiagonals are made up of the elements (−M ); all other coeﬃcients are zero. In this tridiagonal system, the ﬁrst equation (i = 1) cannot contain the term −M ϑk+1 and likewise, in the last equation (i = n) 0

206

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

the term −M ϑk+1 n+1 may not appear. These terms are eliminated by taking the boundary conditions into consideration. If the temperatures at the boundaries are given, the grid is chosen such that x = x0 and x = xn+1 coincide with the two boundaries. This means that ϑk0 , ϑk+1 0 and ϑkn+1 , ϑk+1 n+1 are always known, and the ﬁrst equation of the tridiagonal system looks like

+ (2 − 2M ) ϑk1 + M ϑk2 , (2 + 2M ) ϑk+1 − M ϑk+1 = M ϑk0 + ϑk+1 1 2 0

(2.269)

whilst the last equation will be

k+1 − M ϑk+1 . (2.270) = M ϑkn−1 + (2 − 2M ) ϑkn + M ϑkn+1 + ϑk+1 n−1 + (2 + 2M ) ϑn n+1 If the heat ﬂux q(t) ˙ at the left boundary is given, cf. (2.247), the grid is chosen to be the same as in Fig. 2.44, so that the boundary lies in the middle between x0 and x1 . ϑk0 and ϑk+1 will be eliminated using (2.249). The ﬁrst equation now 0 looks like this − M ϑk+1 = (2 − M ) ϑk1 + M ϑk2 + M (2 + M ) ϑk+1 1 2

Δx [q˙ (tk ) + q˙ (tk+1 )] . (2.271) λ

The adiabatic wall is a special case with q˙ ≡ 0. When the heat ﬂux at the right edge is given, ϑkn+1 and ϑk+1 n+1 are eliminated in the same manner as above. When considering the heat transfer condition (2.253) we lay the grid out as in Fig. 2.45, namely so that the boundary coincides with x1 or xn , when (2.253) is are eliminated stipulated at the left or right boundary. Once again ϑk0 and ϑk+1 0 from the ﬁrst equation of the tridiagonal system (2.268), this time using (2.254). This yields [1 + M (1 + Bi∗ )] ϑk+1 − M ϑk+1 = [1 − M (1 + Bi∗ )] ϑk1 1 2

+M ϑk2 + M Bi∗ ϑkS + ϑk+1 S

(2.272)

for the ﬁrst equation. We eliminate ϑkn+1 and ϑk+1 n+1 using (2.257) giving us as the last equation ∗ k+1 = M ϑkn−1 + [1 − M (1 + Bi∗ )] ϑkn −M ϑk+1 n−1 + [1 + M (1 + Bi )] ϑn

. +M Bi∗ ϑkS + ϑk+1 S

(2.273)

The diﬀerence method of Crank-Nicolson is stable for all M . The size of the time steps is limited by the accuracy requirements. Very large values of M lead to ﬁnite oscillations in the numerical solution which only slowly decay with increasing k, cf. [2.52].

2.4 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with diﬀerence methods

207

Example 2.7: The cooling problem discussed in Example 2.6 will now be solved using the Crank-Nicolson implicit diﬀerence method. The grid divisions will be kept as that in Fig. 2.46. The tridiagonal system for each time step, which has to be solved consists of ﬁve equations and has the form A ϑk+1 = b with the coeﬃcient matrix ⎡ 2+M ⎢ −M ⎢ 0 A=⎢ ⎢ ⎣ 0 0 the solution vector and the right side

−M 2 + 2M −M 0 0

0 −M 2 +2M −M 0

0 0 −M 2 + 2M −M

0 0 0 −M 1 + 1.15 M

⎤ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ , ⎥ ⎦

T ϑk+1 = ϑk+1 , ϑk+1 , ϑk+1 , ϑk+1 , ϑk+1 1 2 3 4 5 ⎡

⎤

(2 − M ) ϑk1 + M ϑk2

⎢ ⎢ M ϑk1 + (2 − 2M ) ϑk2 + M ϑk3 ⎢ k k k b=⎢ ⎢ M ϑ2 + (2 − 2M ) ϑ3 + M ϑ4 ⎢ k k ⎣ M ϑ3 + (2 − 2M ) ϑ4 + M ϑk5 M ϑk4 + (1 − 1.15M ) ϑk5

⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ . ⎥ ⎥ ⎦

In the ﬁrst step of the process (k = 0) all temperatures are set to ϑ0i = 1.000, corresponding to the initial condition ϑ(xi , t0 ) = 1. We choose M = 1, a time step three times larger than that in the explicit method from Example 2.6, namely Δt = 240 s = 4.0 min. The temperatures for the ﬁrst 10 time steps are given in Table 2.11.

Table 2.11: Temperatures in the cooling of a steel plate, calculated using the Crank-Nicolson method with M = aΔt/Δx2 = 1. tk /s

ϑk1

ϑk2

ϑk3

ϑk4

ϑk5

240 480 720 960 1200

0.9990 0.9937 0.9815 0.9636 0.9427

0.9969 0.9851 0.9657 0.9437 0.9208

0.9885 0.9594 0.9282 0.9013 0.8756

0.9573 0.8982 0.8639 0.8322 0.8058

0.8406 0.8044 0.7635 0.7356 0.7105

1440 1680 1920 2160 2400

0.9203 0.8974 0.8744 0.8516 0.8292

0.8975 0.8743 0.8514 0.8289 0.8070

0.8514 0.8282 0.8058 0.7841 0.7630

0.7816 0.7592 0.7381 0.7179 0.6984

0.6887 0.6686 0.6498 0.6318 0.6146

A comparison of the temperatures at time t4 = 960 s with the values shown in Table 2.10, indicates that the Crank-Nicolson method delivers better results than the explicit method, despite the time step being three times larger.

208

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

In order to investigate the inﬂuence of the size of the time step on the accuracy we also used alongside M = 1, M = 2, 5 and 10. The temperature distributions for t = 9600 s = 160 min are shown in Table 2.12. Table 2.12: Comparison of the temperatures for t = 9600 s, calculated with diﬀerent modulus values M . M

ϑ1

ϑ2

ϑ3

ϑ4

ϑ5

1 2 5 10

0.3684 0.3683 0.3677 0.3683

0.3584 0.3584 0.3584 0.3532

0.3388 0.3387 0.3386 0.3259

0.3099 0.3099 0.3051 0.2995

0.2727 0.2727 0.2801 0.3180

Analyt. Solution

0.3684

0.3584

0.3389

0.3101

0.2730

This time is reached after 40 steps with M = 1, 20 steps for M = 2, 8 steps for M = 5 and ﬁnally 4 steps for M = 10. The temperatures for M = 1 and M = 2 agree very well with each other and with the analytical solution. The values for M = 5 yield somewhat larger deviations, while the result for M = 10 is useless. This large step produces temperature oscillations which are physically impossible. In [2.52], p. 122, a condition for the restriction of the step size, so that oscillations can be avoided, is given for a transient heat conduction problem with boundary conditions diﬀerent from our example. The transfer of this condition to the present task delivers the limit M<

2 δ = 5.7 . π Δx

It conﬁrms the result of our numerical test calculations.

2.4.4

Noncartesian coordinates. Temperature dependent material properties

In the following we will discuss the diﬀerence method with consideration for temperature dependent material properties as well as for cylindrical and spherical coordinates, whereby geometric one-dimensional heat ﬂow is assumed in the radial direction. The decisive diﬀerential equation for the temperature ﬁeld is then ∂ϑ 1 ∂ m ∂ϑ c = m r λ (2.274) ∂t r ∂r ∂r with the exponents

⎧ ⎨ 0 for the plate (r = x), 1 for the cylinder, m= ⎩ 2 for the sphere.

2.4 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with diﬀerence methods

209

The establishment of diﬀerence equations is based on the discretisation of the self-adjoint diﬀerential operator ∂ϑ ∂ f (2.275) D := ∂r ∂r with f := rm λ(ϑ) ,

m = 0, 1, 2 .

(2.276)

We will now discuss this and derive the diﬀerence equations for diﬀerent coordinates systems with and without consideration of the temperature dependence of the properties of the material. 2.4.4.1

The discretisation of the self-adjoint diﬀerential operator

It is often advantageous to use a grid which does not have regular divisions in the r-direction for the discretisation of the operator D from (2.275). The use of smaller separations between the grid lines allows the stronger curvature of the temperature proﬁle for small r-values to be more accurately considered. Therefore we will implement the use of a so-called centred grid with any (dependent on i) mesh size Δri for the discretisation of D, as shown in Fig. 2.47. Using central diﬀerence quotients we then obtain k k ∂ϑ 1 ∂ϑ k . f − f Di = Δri ∂r i+ 1 ∂r i− 1 2

2

Replacing the ﬁrst derivatives with central diﬀerence quotients gives k 2 f

2 f 1 i−1/2 i+1/2 Dik = . ϑk − ϑki − ϑk − ϑki−1 Δri Δri + Δri+1 i+1 Δri + Δri−1 i According to (2.276) k fi± 1 = 2

ri ±

Δri 2

m λ ϑi± 1 2

,

m = 0, 1, 2 ,

(2.277)

(2.278)

is valid. The thermal conductivities which appear here at the temperatures ϑki+ 1 2 or ϑki− 1 have to be calculated by a suitable mean value formulation of the thermal 2

Fig. 2.47: Centred grid for the discretisation of the self-adjoint differential operator D according to (2.275)

210

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

conductivities at the known temperatures ϑki , ϑki+1 , ϑki−1 at the grid points. We will come back to this in 2.4.4.3. Next we wish to concentrate on the simple case of constant properties. 2.4.4.2

Constant material properties. Cylindrical coordinates

Equation (2.278) simpliﬁes to

fi± 1 2

Δri = λ ri ± 2

m (2.279)

for constant thermal conductivity. Using this assumption the diﬀerence equation for the cylinder (m = 1) will now be derived. The case for the sphere m = 2 is left to the reader to solve. The simple diﬀerence equations for a plate (m = 0) are available in 2.4.1 and 2.4.3, when a constant mesh size Δri = Δx is assumed. For a cylinder with λ = const we obtain, from (2.277) and (2.279), the expression

ri + k gi ϑi+1 − ϑki − gi− ϑki − ϑki−1 , (2.280) Dik = λ 2 Δri where we have introduced the abbreviations gi+ :=

2 + Δri /ri 1 + Δri+1 /Δri

and gi− :=

2 − Δri /ri . 1 + Δri−1 /Δri

(2.281)

A further simpliﬁcation is possible if the grid spacing Δr is assumed to be constant. With Δr Δr gi+ = 1 + and gi− = 1 − (2.282) 2ri 2ri we then obtain from (2.280) Δr ri Δr k k k k 1+ ϑi+1 − 2ϑi + 1 − ϑi−1 . (2.283) Di = λ Δr2 2ri 2ri If an explicit diﬀerence equation is desired, then the time based derivative in k k ∂ϑ ∂ϑ a ∂ 1 r = = Dk ∂t i ri ∂r ∂r i cri i has to be replaced according to (2.239). This produces the explicit diﬀerence equation Δr Δr k+1 k k ϑi−1 + (1 − 2M ) ϑi + M 1 + ϑki+1 , (2.284) ϑi = M 1 − 2ri 2ri whose modulus M has to satisfy the stability criterion mentioned in 2.4.1.2 M = aΔt/Δr2 ≤

1 . 2

(2.285)

2.4 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with diﬀerence methods

211

The boundary conditions are treated in the same manner as in section 2.4.2. To transfer the Crank-Nicolson [2.60] implicit diﬀerence method, which is always stable, over to cylindrical coordinates requires the discretisation of the equation k+ 12 k+ 12

a ∂ 1 1 k+1 ∂ϑ ∂ϑ = ≈ Di + Dik . r ∂t i ri ∂r ∂r i cri 2 With the time derivative from (2.266) and Dik or Dik+1 according to (2.283) we obtain the following diﬀerence equation Δr Δr k+1 k+1 k ϑi−1 + (2 + 2M ) ϑi − M 1 + ϑk+1 (2.286) −M 1− i+1 = Ci , 2ri 2ri whose right hand side Δr Δr Cik = M 1 − ϑki−1 + (2 − 2M ) ϑki + M 1 + ϑki+1 2ri 2ri

(2.287)

contains the known temperatures at time tk . This equation leads to a tridiagonal system of linear equations which have to be solved for each time step, cf. 2.4.3. The temperatures ϑk0 and ϑk+1 which appear in the ﬁrst equation and those from 0 the last equation ϑkn+1 and ϑk+1 n+1 , can be eliminated with the help of the boundary conditions, which was extensively discussed in 2.4.3. A non-equidistant grid, cf. Fig. 2.47, requires the use of the discretised diﬀerential operator Dik from (2.280) with the functions gi+ and gi− according to (2.281). The explicit diﬀerential equation analogous to (2.284) has the form

ϑk+1 = Mi gi− ϑki−1 + 1 − Mi gi+ + gi− ϑki + Mi gi+ ϑki+1 i

(2.288)

with the i-dependent modulus Mi = aΔt/Δri2 .

(2.289)

The diﬀerence method is only stable if none of the coeﬃcients in (2.288) is negative. This leads to the stability condition Mi ≤ (gi+ + gi− )−1 , and therefore " Δt ≤ min

1 Δri2 a gi+ + gi−

# .

(2.290)

The stable, implicit method from Crank and Nicolson can be used without this restriction. A generalisation of (2.286) delivers the tridiagonal linear equation system +

k+1 − = Cik ϑi − Mi gi+ ϑk+1 − Mi gi− ϑk+1 i−1 + 2 + Mi gi + gi i

(2.291)

with the right hand side

Cik = Mi gi− ϑki−1 + 2 − Mi gi+ + gi− ϑki + Mi gi+ ϑki+1 , which has to be solved for each time step. The modulus Mi is given by (2.289).

(2.292)

212

2.4.4.3

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Temperature dependent material properties

If λ and c change with temperature, cf. section 2.1.4, a closed solution to the heat conduction equation cannot generally be found, which only leaves the possibility of using a numerical solution method. We will show how temperature dependent properties are accounted for by using the example of the plate, m = 0 in (2.274). The transfer of the solution to a cylinder or sphere (m = 1 or 2 respectively) is left to the reader. It is fairly simple to carry out with the help of the general discretisation equation (2.277) for the diﬀerential operator D from (2.275). Using an equidistant grid with spacing Δx, with Δri = Δri+1 = Δri−1 = Δx and m = 0 we obtain from (2.277) and (2.278)

k

1 k k k k k ϑ − λ ϑ . (2.293) λ − ϑ − ϑ Dik = 1 1 i i i−1 i− 2 Δx2 i+ 2 i+1 In which λki±1/2 is the thermal conductivity at temperature ϑki±1/2 . This requires a suitable mean value to be chosen, the arithmetic, geometric or harmonic mean of the thermal conductivities at the known temperatures ϑki and ϑki+1 or ϑki nd ϑki−1 . The type of mean value formation does not play a decisive role if λ is only weakly dependent on ϑ or if the step size Δx is chosen to be very small. D. Marsal [2.72] recommends the use of the harmonic mean, so λki± 1 = 2

2λki λki±1 , λki + λki±1

(2.294)

where λki = λ(ϑki ) = λ[ϑ(xi , tk )]. Using the harmonic mean we obtain, from (2.294), k ϑi+1 − ϑki ϑki − ϑki−1 2λki . (2.295) Dik = − Δx2 1 + λki /λki+1 1 + λki /λki−1 In order to avoid complicated iterations it is recommended that an explicit diﬀerence method is applied to this case. We replace the time derivative with the ﬁrst diﬀerence quotient according to (2.239) and obtain from (2.274) with (2.295) the diﬀerence equation k ϑi+1 − ϑki ϑki − ϑki−1 2aki Δt k+1 k ϑi = ϑi + . (2.296) − Δx2 1 + λki /λki+1 1 + λki /λki−1 Here aki = a(ϑki ) is the thermal diﬀusivity at the temperature ϑki . The stability of the diﬀerence method is guaranteed by choosing a small enough time step Δt such that the coeﬃcient of ϑki in (2.296) is positive. Therefore it always has to be 1 1 2aki Δt >0 . (2.297) + 1− Δx2 1 + λki /λki+1 1 + λki /λki−1 As a and λ change with each time step, a control for this inequality should be built into the computer program and should the situation arise Δt should be reduced stepwise.

2.4 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with diﬀerence methods

213

The temperature dependence of λ must also be considered in the heat transfer condition (2.253) and for the boundary condition of prescribed heat ﬂux. The Biot number Bi∗ will be temperature dependent and this must be noted in the elimination of the temperatures ϑk0 and ϑkn+1 from (2.254) and (2.257) respectively and in (2.297) with i = 1 or i = n.

2.4.5

Transient two- and three-dimensional temperature ﬁelds

If planar or spatial temperature ﬁelds are to be determined the computation time and storage capacity increase signiﬁcantly in comparison to geometrically onedimensional problems. In the following we will restrict ourselves to rectangular regions (cartesian coordinates); cylindrical and spherical problems can be solved by discretisation of the corresponding diﬀerential equations. The ﬁnite diﬀerence method is not well suited to complicated geometries, especially when boundary conditions of the second or third type are stipulated at boundaries of any particular shape. In these cases it is more convenient to use a ﬁnite element method. We will assume that the material properties are constant. The heat conduction equation for planar, transient temperature ﬁelds with heat sources has the form 2 ˙ (x, y, t, ϑ) ∂ϑ W ∂ ϑ ∂ 2ϑ + + =a . (2.298) 2 2 ∂t ∂x ∂y c The temperature ϑ = ϑ(x, y, t) is to be determined in a rectangle parallel to the

Fig. 2.48: Planar grid for the discretisation of the heat conduction equation (2.298) in the rectangular region x0 ≤ x ≤ xn , y0 ≤ y ≤ yl

x- and y-axes. We discretise the coordinates by xi = x0 + iΔx ,

yj = y0 + jΔy

and tk = t0 + kΔt .

214

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

The temperature at an intersection point of the planar grid in Fig. 2.48 will be indicated by ϑki,j = ϑ(xi , yj , tk ) . The corresponding equation for the thermal power density is

k k ˙ (xi , yj , tk ) or Wi,j ˙ ϑki,j , ˙ i,j =W =W W ˙ is only dependent on the temperature in the case where W The two second derivatives in the x- or y-directions are approximated by the central diﬀerence quotient, so that 2 k

1 k ∂ ϑ = ϑi−1,j − 2ϑki,j + ϑi+1,j + O Δx2 (2.299) 2 2 ∂x i,j Δx and

∂ 2ϑ ∂y 2

k = i,j

1 k ϑi,j−1 − 2ϑi,j + ϑi,j+1 + O Δy 2 2 Δy

(2.300)

are valid. In order to obtain an explicit diﬀerence equation, we use the forward diﬀerence quotient for the time derivative k

∂ϑ 1 k+1 ϑi,j − ϑki,j + O(Δt) (2.301) = ∂t i,j Δt Using these diﬀerence quotients, we obtain, from (2.298), the explicit ﬁnite diﬀerence formula

= (1 − 2Mx − 2My ) ϑki,j + Mx ϑki−1,j + ϑki+1,j ϑk+1 i,j (2.302)

Δt k ˙ i,j . +My ϑki,j−1 + ϑki,j+1 + W c Two moduli appear here Mx :=

aΔt Δx2

and My :=

aΔt . Δy2

For a square grid (Δx = Δy) we obtain Mx = My = M = aΔt/Δx2 , and (2.302) is simpliﬁed to k

Δt k k k k k ˙ ϑk+1 . (2.303) W i,j = (1 − 4M ) ϑi,j + M ϑi−1,j + ϑi+1,j + ϑi,j−1 + ϑi,j+1 + c i,j Equations (2.302) and (2.303) enable us to explicitly calculate the temperatures ϑ1i,j at time t1 = t0 + Δt from the initial temperature distribution ϑ0i,j . These can then be used to calculate the temperature ϑ2i,j of the next time level etc. This diﬀerence method is relatively simple to program. It is also suitable for a tem˙ (ϑ), because W ˙ k is calculated for perature dependent thermal power density W i,j k the already known temperature ϑi,j . The disadvantage of this explicit diﬀerence

2.4 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with diﬀerence methods

215

method lies in its limited stability, cf. 2.4.1.2. The stability condition, from which none of the coeﬃcients on the right hand side of (2.302) are allowed to be negative, limits the time step Δx2 . Δt ≤ (2.304) 2a 1 + (Δx/Δy)2 This leads to an even smaller time step than in the condition (2.242) for geometrical one-dimensional heat conduction. The restriction on the step size (2.304) due to the stability condition for the explicit diﬀerence method can be avoided by using an implicit method. This means that (2.298) is discretised at time tk+1 and the backward diﬀerence quotient is used to replace the time derivative. With k+1

∂ϑ 1 k+1 ϑi,j − ϑki,j + O (Δt) = ∂t i,j Δt and the diﬀerence quotients (2.299) and (2.300) formulated for tk+1 we obtain ˙ ≡ 0, the implicit diﬀerence equation from (2.298), with the simpliﬁcation that W

a k+1 a k+1 1 k+1 k+1 k+1 ϑi,j − ϑki,j . ϑi−1,j − 2ϑk+1 ϑi,j−1 − 2ϑk+1 i,j + ϑi+1,j + i,j + ϑi,j+1 = 2 2 Δx Δy Δt (2.305) This equation is to be formulated for all grid points (i, j). A system of linear equations for the unknown temperatures at time tk+1 , that has to be solved for every time step, is obtained. Each equation contains ﬁve unknowns, only the temperature ϑki,j at the previous time tk is known. A good solution method has been presented by P.W. Peaceman and H.H. Rachford [2.64]. It is known as the “alternating-direction implicit procedure” (ADIP). Here, instead of the equation system (2.305) two tridiagonal systems are solved, through which the computation time is reduced, see also [2.72]. The boundary conditions for two dimensional temperature ﬁelds are easily fulﬁlled as long as the boundaries run parallel to the coordinate axes. In addition to the grid points inside the region a series of points outside the region are used. These extra grid points enable the three types of boundary condition from section 2.4.2 to be considered without any diﬃculties. Signiﬁcant complications can appear for boundaries which do not run parallel with the coordinate axes. The simplest condition to satisfy in this case is the prescribed temperature. Here it is suﬃcient to approximate the curved wall with straight lines parallel to x and y, with suitably small grid spacing Δx and Δy. However the discretisation of the derivative ∂ϑ/∂n in the normal direction to the edges leads to complicated expressions which are diﬃcult to use. The discretisation of the heat conduction equation can also be undertaken for three-dimensional temperature ﬁelds, and this is left to the reader to attempt. The stability condition (2.304) is tightened for the explicit diﬀerence formula which means time steps even smaller than those for planar problems. The system of equations of the implicit diﬀerence method cannot be solved by applying the ADIP-method, because it is unstable in three dimensions. Instead a similar method introduced by J. Douglas and H.H. Rachford [2.66], [2.67], is used, that is stable and still leads to tridiagonal systems. Unfortunately the discretisation error using this method is greater than that from ADIP, see also [2.72].

216

2.4.6

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Steady-state temperature ﬁelds

The application of the diﬀerence method to steady-state heat conduction problems involves the discretisation of the two- or three-dimensional region, in which the temperature ﬁeld has to be determined, by the choice of a suitable grid. The temperatures at the grid points are determined by diﬀerence equations which link each temperature to the temperatures at the neighbouring grid points. The diﬀerence equations form a system of linear equations which replaces the heat conduction equation with its associated boundary conditions, and whose solution delivers approximate values for the temperatures at each grid point. Reducing the grid spacing (mesh size) increases the number of grid points and linear diﬀerence equations, from which the temperatures calculated are better approximations to the true values. We will limit ourselves to planar temperature ﬁelds; three-dimensional ﬁelds are calculated in a similar manner. Some well suited methods and formulated algorithms for these temperature ﬁelds can be found, in particular, in the work by D. Marsal [2.72]. This also includes methods which go beyond the simple diﬀerence method which we will discuss in the following. 2.4.6.1

A simple ﬁnite diﬀerence method for plane, steady-state temperature ﬁelds

Plane, steady-state temperature ﬁelds ϑ = ϑ(x, y) with heat sources of thermal ˙ are described by the diﬀerential equation power density W ˙ (x, y, ϑ) ∂ 2ϑ ∂ 2ϑ W =0 . + 2+ 2 ∂x ∂y λ

(2.306)

A square grid with mesh size Δx = Δy is chosen for the discretisation, such that xi = x0 + iΔx ,

i = 0, 1, 2, . . .

yj = y0 + jΔx ,

j = 0, 1, 2, . . .

and are valid. The temperature at grid point (xi , yj ) is indicated by ϑi,j = ϑ(xi , yj ), ˙ i,j = W ˙ (xi , yj , ϑi,j ). and equally the thermal power density by W In contrast to the previous sections, we will now derive the diﬀerence equation associated with (2.306) through an energy balance in an illustrative manner. To do this we interpret each grid point as the centre of a small block, which is cut out of the thermally conductive material, Fig. 2.49. The block has a square base of side length Δx and a height b perpendicular to the x,y-plane. The temperature ϑi,j at the grid point (i, j) is taken to be the characteristic mean temperature of the entire block. Heat is conducted to the block from its four immediate neighbours with the mean temperatures ϑi+1,j , ϑi,j+1 , ϑi−1,j and ϑi,j−1 . Therefore, the energy

2.4 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with diﬀerence methods

217

Fig. 2.49: Block with square cross section around the point (i, j) for the derivation of the energy balance (2.307)

balance for this block contains the four heat ﬂows from Fig. 2.49 and the thermal ˙ i,j ΔV , in which ΔV = Δx2 b is the power arising from the internal heat sources W volume of the block : ˙ i,j ΔV = 0 . Q˙ i+1 + Q˙ j+1 + Q˙ i−1 + Q˙ j−1 + W

(2.307)

The heat ﬂow Q˙ i+1 , from block (i + 1, j) to block (i, j) is given by λ Q˙ i+1 = q˙i+1 Δx b = (ϑi+1,j − ϑi,j ) Δx b = λ (ϑi+1,j − ϑi,j ) b . Δx Correspondingly we get Q˙ j+1 = λ (ϑi,j+1 − ϑi,j ) b , Q˙ i−1 = λ (ϑi−1,j − ϑi,j ) b and Q˙ j−1 = λ (ϑi,j−1 − ϑi,j ) b . In the sense of the sign agreement in thermodynamics, the four heat ﬂows will be taken as positive quantities if they ﬂow into the block (i, j). With that we obtain from the energy balance (2.307) the desired diﬀerence equation ˙ i,j Δx2 /λ . ϑi+1,j + ϑi,j+1 + ϑi−1,j + ϑi,j−1 − 4 ϑi,j = −W

(2.308)

This is an approximate equation as each small, but ﬁnite block has only one discrete temperature associated with it and because only the heat conduction between immediate neighbours has been considered. As we can show with the use of the discretisation equations (2.299) and (2.300) for the second derivatives, we also obtain (2.308) by the usual discretisation of the diﬀerential equation (2.306). The discretisation error in this case is O (Δx2 ); it decreases to zero with the square of the mesh size (= block width).

218

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

The diﬀerence equation (2.308) has to be formulated for each grid point inside the region. The corresponding diﬀerence equations for the points on the edges will be derived in the next section. A linear equation system is obtained which, with ﬁne grid division, has many equations. Numerical mathematics oﬀers methods which can be used to solve very large systems of equations [2.61], [2.62]. Advantages and disadvantages of these solution methods are discussed by D. Marsal [2.72] and G.D. Smith [2.52]. In general iterative methods, described in detail by D.M. Young [2.68], are used, in particular the Gauss-Seidel-method and the method of successive over-relaxation (SOR-method). Example 2.8: A wall of thickness δ surrounds a room with a square base; the length of the internal side of the square is 2.5 δ. The wall has constant surface temperatures ϑi and ϑo < ϑi respectively. Calculate the heat ﬂow out of the room due to the temperature diﬀerence ϑi − ϑo .

Fig. 2.50: Wall of a room with square base. a Dimensions, b Coarse grid (Δx = δ/2) + with four unknown (normalised) temperatures ϑ+ 1 to ϑ4

For reasons of symmetry it is suﬃcient to deal with only an eighth of the base, Fig. 2.50a. The desired heat ﬂow rate lies between two limits. They can be calculated, with the inner wall surface to be λ Q˙ i = 8 · 1.25 · δ · b (ϑi − ϑo ) = 10 bλ (ϑi − ϑo ) δ and with the outer surface of the wall λ Q˙ o = 8 · 2.25 · δ · b (ϑi − ϑo ) = 18 bλ (ϑi − ϑo ) δ where b is the dimension of the wall perpendicular to the drawing plane in Fig. 2.50a. The correct value between 10 and 18 for the shape factor Sb =

Q˙ , λb (ϑi − ϑo )

see section 2.2.5.2, is obtained by calculating the temperature ﬁeld in the wall. We use the dimensionless temperature ϑ+ = (ϑ − ϑo )/(ϑi − ϑo ), which lies in the region 0 ≤ ϑ+ ≤ 1. A very coarse grid with Δx = δ/2 delivers four grid points with the unknown + temperatures ϑ+ 1 to ϑ4 , cf. Fig. 2.50b. They are calculated using the diﬀerence equations

2.4 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with diﬀerence methods

219

˙ i,j ≡ 0 according to (2.308) with W + + ϑ+ 2 + 0 + ϑ1 + 1 − 4 ϑ1

= 0 ,

+ + ϑ+ 3 + 0 + ϑ1 + 1 − 4 ϑ2

= 0 ,

ϑ+ 4

+1−

4 ϑ+ 3

= 0 ,

+ + 0 + 0 + ϑ+ 3 + ϑ 3 − 4 ϑ4

= 0 .

+0+

ϑ+ 2

The ﬁrst and fourth equations concern the symmetry of the temperature ﬁeld along the dotted line of symmetry in Fig. 2.50b. The solution of the four equations yields the temperatures ϑ+ 1 = 0.4930,

ϑ+ 2 = 0.4789,

ϑ+ 3 = 0.4225,

ϑ+ 4 = 0.2113 .

With these results the heat ﬂow conducted to the outer surface of the wall is determined to be

+ + + Q˙ = 8 bλ (ϑi − ϑo ) ϑ+ 1 + ϑ2 + ϑ3 + ϑ4 = 12.85 bλ (ϑi − ϑo ) . The shape factor has a value of Sb = 12.85. The corners increase the heat ﬂow by 28.5 % compared with Q˙ i , the heat ﬂow calculated with the internal wall area. These are inaccurate approximations due to the coarseness of the grid. A reﬁned grid would deliver more accurate temperatures, but increase the number of diﬀerence equations. Halving the mesh size (Δx = δ/4) already leads to a system of 24 linear equations.

2.4.6.2

Consideration of the boundary conditions

The system of linear equations originating from the diﬀerence equation (2.308) has to be supplemented by the diﬀerence equations for the points around the boundaries where the decisive boundary conditions are taken into account. As a simpliﬁcation we will assume that the boundaries run parallel to the x- and ydirections. Curved boundaries can be replaced by a series of straight lines parallel to the x- and y-axes. However a suﬃcient degree of accuracy can only be reached in this case by having a very small mesh size Δx. If the boundaries are coordinate lines of a polar coordinate system (r, ϕ), it is recommended that the diﬀerential equation and its boundary conditions are formulated in polar coordinates and then the corresponding ﬁnite diﬀerence equations are derived. The simplest case to consider is the ﬁrst kind of boundary condition. For this the boundaries must coincide with grid lines, as in Example 2.8, and the stipulated temperatures must be used in the diﬀerence equation (2.308) for the grid points lying on the boundaries. This is achieved for boundaries which run parallel to the x- and y-axes, by the suitable choice of mesh size Δx. If necessary the square grid used up until now must be replaced by a rectangular grid with diﬀerent grid spacings Δx and Δy. The diﬀerence equation (2.308) has to be altered, which can be carried out without diﬃculties using the explanations in 2.4.6.1. The boundary condition of a given temperature can also be satisﬁed in a good approximation for curved boundaries. Fig. 2.51 shows a grid point (i, j) close to the boundary. The straight lines x = xi and y = yj running through the point cut

220

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Fig. 2.51: Grid point (i, j) near the curved boundary R, at which the temperature ϑR is prescribed

the curved boundary, where the temperatures ϑR,n and ϑR,n+1 at the intersections are given. Instead of (2.308) the diﬀerence equation for grid point (i, j) is 2 2 2 ϑi−1,j ϑR,n + ϑR,n+1 + εn (1 + εn ) εn+1 (1 + εn+1 ) 1 + εn 2 1 Δx2 ˙ 1 Wi,j . ϑi,j = − + ϑi,j−1 − 2 + 1 + εn+1 εn εn+1 λ (2.309) Its derivation can be found in G.D. Smith [2.52]. The heat transfer condition can only be satisﬁed simply if the boundary consists of straight lines which run parallel to the x- and y-axes. The boundary has to coincide with a grid line, and the diﬀerence equation for this sort of boundary point is acquired from an energy balance. This is shown for a grid point on a boundary which coincides with the grid line y = yj , Fig. 2.52. The heat ﬂows transferred by conduction from the neighbouring blocks into the shaded block are λ Δx λ Q˙ i−1 = (ϑi−1,j − ϑi,j ) b = (ϑi−1,j − ϑi,j ) b , Δx 2 2 λ Q˙ j−1 = (ϑi,j−1 − ϑi,j ) Δx b = λ (ϑi,j−1 − ϑi,j ) b Δx and

λ Δx λ Q˙ i+1 = (ϑi+1,j − ϑi,j ) b = (ϑi+1,j − ϑi,j ) b . Δx 2 2 The heat ﬂow transferred from the ﬂuid at temperature ϑS is Q˙ S = αi (ϑS − ϑi,j ) Δx b

Fig. 2.52: Derivation of the ﬁnite diﬀerence equation for the boundary point (xi , yj ) with heat transfer to a ﬂuid at temperature ϑS

2.4 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with diﬀerence methods

221

where αi is the local heat transfer coeﬃcient at the point xi . Putting the four heat ﬂows into the balance equation ˙ i,j Δx2 b/2 = 0 Q˙ i−1 + Q˙ j−1 + Q˙ i+1 + Q˙ S + W produces the diﬀerence equation ϑi,j−1 +

1 ˙ i,j Δx2 /2λ (ϑi−1,j + ϑi+1,j ) + Bi∗i ϑS − (2 + Bi∗i ) ϑi,j = −W 2

(2.310)

with Bi∗i = αi Δx/λ as the local Biot number. This number allows us to easily account for changes in the heat transfer coeﬃcient along the boundary.

Fig. 2.53: Explanation of the diﬀerence equation for the boundary point a in the reﬂex corner, b at the outer corner with heat transfer to a ﬂuid at temperature ϑS

The diﬀerence equations which hold for heat transfer at the internal (reﬂex) corner according to Fig. 2.53a, and at the outer corner according to Fig. 2.53b, are found in the same manner. We obtain for the internal corner 1 ˙ i,j Δx2 /4λ (ϑi,j−1 + ϑi+1,j ) + Bi∗i ϑS − (3 + Bi∗i ) ϑi,j = −3W 2 (2.311) and for the corner in Fig. 2.53b ϑi,j+1 + ϑi−1,j +

1 ˙ i,j Δx2 /4λ . (ϑi−1,j + ϑi,j−1 ) + Bi∗i ϑS − (1 + Bi∗i ) ϑi,j = −W 2

(2.312)

˙ i,j = 0 has to be put into the relationships If no internal heat sources are present, W (2.309) to (2.312). Putting, Bi∗i = 0, therefore αi = 0, into (2.310) to (2.312), makes these relationships valid for an adiabatic surface. This corresponds to the special case q˙ = 0, of the boundary condition of prescribed heat ﬂux q. ˙ According to section 2.4.2 this boundary condition is more accurately accounted for when the grid is laid out such that the boundary with stipulated heat ﬂux has a distance of Δx/2 from the grid line, see Fig. 2.54. The energy balance for the block highlighted in Fig. 2.54 which has a temperature ϑi,j yields ˙ i,j Δx2 b = 0 , Q˙ i+1 + Q˙ i−1 + Q˙ j−1 + q˙i Δx b + W

222

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Fig. 2.54: Derivation of the diﬀerence equation (2.313) with given heat ﬂux q˙i at the boundary

where q˙i = q(x ˙ i ) is the given heat ﬂux at x = xi . The diﬀerence equation follows on from the energy balance: ϑi+1,j + ϑi−1,j + ϑi,j−1 − 3ϑi,j = −q˙i

2 Δx ˙ i,j Δx . −W λ λ

(2.313)

Similar diﬀerence equations are obtained when the heat ﬂux is stipulated on a boundary which runs parallel to the y-axis. Example 2.9: The shaped brick shown in Fig. 2.55a of an oven wall (λ = 0.80 W/K m) with trapezoidal cross section (δ = 0.30 m) is insulated on the perpendicular surfaces. At the upper surface heat is transferred to the air which is at constant temperature ϑS ; the heat transfer coeﬃcient is α = 10 W/m2 K. The lower surface has a constant temperature ϑR > ϑS . The heat transferred through the brick to the air is to be calculated along with the temperatures of the surface which releases the heat.

Fig. 2.55: Heat conduction in a shaped brick. a Dimensions and given tempera+ tures, b square grid for the calculation of the temperatures ϑ+ 1 to ϑ8 In order to approximately determine the temperature ﬁeld we will use the grid illustrated in Fig. 2.55b with the coarse mesh size Δx = Δy = δ/3 = 0.10 m. As in the last example, we introduce the dimensionless temperature ϑ+ =

ϑ − ϑS ϑR − ϑS

,

0 ≤ ϑ+ ≤ 1

+ and compile the diﬀerence equations for the eight unknown temperatures ϑ+ 1 to ϑ8 . Equa˙ i,j ≡ 0 is decisive for the three surface temperatures, which results in tion (2.310) with W

2.4 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with diﬀerence methods

the three equations

+

+ ∗ ϑ1 + ϑ+ 2 − (2 + Bi ) ϑ1

+ + + 1 ∗ ϑ+ 5 + 2 ϑ1 + ϑ3 − (2 + Bi ) ϑ2 +

+ + 1 ∗ ϑ+ 6 + 2 ϑ2 + ϑ3 − (2 + Bi ) ϑ3 ϑ+ 4 +

1 2

=

0 ,

=

0 ,

=

0 .

223

It should be noted here that ϑ+ S = 0. The perpendicular adiabatic walls are considered to + be planes of symmetry with a reﬂection of the temperatures ϑ+ 1 and ϑ3 in the ﬁrst and last equations, respectively. + For the two inner grid points with temperatures ϑ+ 4 and ϑ5 the diﬀerence equation (2.308) is applied: + + + + ϑ+ = 0 , 5 + ϑ1 + ϑ4 + ϑ7 − 4 ϑ4 + + + + ϑ+ 6 + ϑ2 + ϑ4 + ϑ8 − 4 ϑ5

=

0 .

+ The grid points close to the lower boundary, with ϑ+ 6 to ϑ8 have “arms”, which are + intersected by the oblique boundary along which ϑR = 1. Here we use (2.309) and imagine that Fig. 2.55b is rotated anticlockwise by 90◦ , such that agreement with Fig. 2.51 exists. + It follows for point 6 with εn = 0.75 and εn+1 = 1 as well as ϑR,n = ϑ+ R and ϑR,n+1 = ϑ6 that 2 2 1 + + ϑ+ ϑ+ + 1 ϑ+ 3 + ϑ5 − 2 6 =0 . R + ϑ6 + 0.75 (1 + 0.75) 1 + 0.75 0.75 + + + The result for the grid point ϑ7 with ϑR,n = ϑR and ϑR,n+1 = ϑ8 is analogous, i.e. 2 2 1 + + ϑ+ ϑ+ + 1 ϑ+ 4 + ϑ7 − 2 7 =0 . R + ϑ8 + 0.75 (1 + 0.75) 1 + 0.75 0.75 The diﬀerence equation for the last, closest to the boundary grid point 8 with εn = 0.25, + εn+1 = 0.50, ϑR,n = ϑ+ R and ϑR,n+1 = ϑR looks like 2 2 2 2 1 1 ϑ+ ϑ+ ϑ+ ϑ+ + ϑ+ 5 + 7 −2 8 = 0. R+ R+ 0.25(1+0.25) 0.50(1+0.50) 1+0.25 1+0.50 0.25 0.50

With Bi∗ = αΔx/λ = 10 (W/m K) 0.10 m/0.80 (W/Km) = 1.25 and ϑ+ R = 1 we obtain from these equations the system

+ + + + ϑ+ = 0.1818 ϑ+ ϑ+ = 0.2500 ϑ+ , 1 2 + 0.3636 ϑ4 , 5 2 + ϑ4 + ϑ6 + ϑ8

+ + + + + + + ϑ2 = 0.1538 ϑ1 + ϑ3 + 0.3077 ϑ5 , ϑ6 = 0.3117 ϑ3 + 0.2727 ϑ5 + 0.4156 , 2

ϑ+ 3

=

ϑ+ 4

=

+ 0.1818 ϑ+ 2 + 0.3636 ϑ6 , +

+ + 0.2500 ϑ1 + ϑ+ , 4 + ϑ5 + ϑ7

ϑ+ 7

+ = 0.3117 ϑ+ 4 + 0.2727 ϑ8 + 0.4156 ,

ϑ+ 8

+ = 0.1333 ϑ+ 5 + 0.1111 ϑ7 + 0.7556 .

Its solution, found according to the iteration method of Gauss-Seidel, delivers the temperatures + + + ϑ+ 1 = 0.258 , ϑ2 = 0.274 , ϑ3 = 0.295 , ϑ4 = 0.573 , + + + ϑ+ 5 = 0.613 , ϑ6 = 0.675 , ϑ7 = 0.848 , ϑ8 = 0.932 . The temperature of the surface bounded by air is not constant; it increases from the left hand corner where the brick is thickest to the right hand corner. Its mean value is

1 + + ϑ+ ϑ + ϑ+ m = 2 + ϑ3 = 0.276 . 3 1 This allows the heat ﬂow transferred to the air to be calculated as Q˙ = α δb (ϑm − ϑS ) = α δb ϑ+ (ϑR − ϑS ) m

where b is the brick dimension perpendicular to the drawing plane of Fig. 2.55a. We obtain ˙ (ϑR − ϑS ) = 0.828 W/K m . Q/b

224

2.5

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with the method of Finite elements

As stated before, in the section on ﬁnite diﬀerence methods, the diﬀerential quotients are replaced by diﬀerence quotients and thus the diﬀerential equations together with their boundary conditions are transformed into a system of algebraic equations. In the methods of ﬁnite elements, often abbreviated as FEM, the differential equations and their boundary conditions are replaced by an equivalent formulation of the variational calculus. For this purpose the domain of interest is subdivided into smaller segments, called the ﬁnite elements. They should cover the original domain as well as possible. As an example, Fig. 2.56 presents the segmentation of an inside round and outside rectangular wall with triangular elements. Instead of triangular elements, rectangular elements or other types of elements may be used for better ﬁt of an irregular domain. Three-dimensional bodies may be replaced by an array of tetrahedrons.

Fig. 2.56: Discretization of a wall with ﬁnite elements

In order to solve the variational problem, the temperatures of each element are approximated. The approximation can be done by interpolating between the grid point temperatures of the elements, either with linear or with other functions, the so-called ansatz functions, for example spline functions or others. Substitution of these approximations into the variational formulation leads to a set of algebraic equations with unknown grid point temperatures. In transient problems, if the time derivatives in the heat conduction equation are not approximated, a system of ordinary diﬀerential equations is obtained, and, as their solution, the temporal change of temperature at the grid points. Unlike the ﬁnite diﬀerence methods, the power of the ﬁnite element method lies in its ability to replace a body of irregular shape by small elements. A coarse grid is satisfactory in regions with small variations of temperature, whereas a ﬁne

2.5 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with the FEM-method

225

grid is necessary in regions with large temperature changes. The application of the ﬁnite element method to heat conduction problems is described in the books of R.W. Lewis [2.70], J.N. Reddy, D.K. Gartling [2.71] and D.Marsal [2.72] among others. Further information is given by standard works on ﬁnite elements, e.g. [2.73] and [2.74]. Available commercial programs, applicable also to heat and mass transfer problems, are: – Abaqus from ABAQUS, Inc., now Dassault Syst`emes, France – ADINA from ADINA Research and Development, Inc., U.S.A. – ANSYS from Swanson Analysis Systems Inc., U.S.A. – COMSOL Multiphysics GmbH, Germany – COSMOS from Structural Research and Analysis Corp., U.S.A. – FIDAP, Fluid Dynamic Analysis Package from Fluent, Lebanon, U.S.A. – FLUENT from Fluent, Lebanon, U.S.A. – MARC from Marc Analysis Research Corp., U.S.A. – NASTRAN, a program developed by NASA. U.S.A. – SEPRAN, program developed by the Technical University of Delft, the Netherlands.

2.5.1

The ﬁnite element method applied to geometrical one-dimensional, steady-state temperature ﬁelds

As an introduction into the method we ﬁrst study the one-dimensional, steadystate heat conduction in a rod. With the aid of this example the basic ideas of the method become comprehensible. The results obtained will then be compared to those of the analytical solution of chapter 2.2.2. The temperature ﬁeld of a longitudinal rod of constant cross section as shown in Fig. 2.7 is to be determined. It is described by the heat conduction equation (2.51) or d2 ϑ+ − m2 h ϑ+ = 0 , (2.314) dx+2 wherein we introduced the dimensionless temperatures according to (2.53) ϑ+ :=

ϑ − ϑS ϑ0 − ϑS

and the dimensionless length x+ = x/h with h as length of the rod. The boundary conditions to be fulﬁlled over the range 0 ≤ x+ ≤ 1 are

ϑ+ x+ = 0 = 1 and

∂ϑ+(x+ = 1) =0 ∂x+ representing constant surface temperature and symmetry at the centerline, respectively.

226

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

As shown by the variational calculus the solution of the problem satisﬁes the integral 1 + 2 1 ∂ϑ 2 2 +2 +m h ϑ (2.315) I= dx+ = Minimum . 2 ∂x+ x+ =0

Instead of solving the diﬀerential equation (2.314) subject to its boundary conditions, now the function ϑ+ (x+ ) which minimizes the integral (2.315)is sought. To illustrate the procedure of ﬁnding this function we consider the unknown exact solution ϑ+ (x+ ) embedded in a family of functions

ϑˆ+ x+ , ε = ϑ+ x+ + ε η x+ . Here the quantity ε ≥ 0 is constant but diﬀerent for each curve. As shown in Fig. 2.57 the functions ϑˆ+ (x+, ε) and ϑ+ (x+ ) should coincide at the boundaries x+ = 0 and x+ = 1. There we have η (0) = η (1) = 0, hence ϑˆ+ (0, ε) = ϑ+ (0) and ϑˆ+ (1, ε) = ϑ+ (1). A precondition to be fulﬁlled is ϑˆ+ (x+, ε = 0) = ϑ+ (x+ ).

Fig. 2.57: Deviation of the temperatures ϑˆ+ (x+ , ε) from the temperatures ϑ+ (x+ ) of the exact solution

Because the integral I (ϑ+ ) is supposed to become a minimum, it holds for all values of ε that

I ϑˆ+ ≥ I ϑ+ and at each position x+ I (ε) ≥ I (ε = 0) . +

Consequently I ϑˆ must be a minimum at ε = 0. Therefore at ε = 0

dI ϑˆ+ =0 . dε

2.5 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with the FEM-method

227

Application of this equation to (2.315) yields:

1 ˆ+ dI ϑˆ+ dϑˆ+ d 1 dϑˆ 2 2 ˆ+ dϑ + 2m h ϑ 2 + dx+ = 0 . = dε 2 dx dε dx+ dε x+ =0

Herein is at ε = 0: dϑˆ+ dϑ+ = ; dx+ dx+ and thus:

d dε

dϑˆ dx+

=

dη ; dx+

ϑˆ+ = ϑ+

and

dϑˆ+ = η, dε

1 + dI ϑˆ+ dϑ dη 2 2 + = + m h ϑ η dx+ = 0 . dε dx+ dx+ x+ =0

Because of 1 x+ =0

we can write

dI ϑˆ+ dε

dϑ+ dη = dx+ dx+

1 x+ =0

d dx+

dϑ+ η + dx

1 dx − +

x+ =0

η

d2 ϑ+ + dx dx+2

/1 1 2 + d ϑ dϑ+ // 2 2 + dx+ = 0 . − η − m h ϑ = η + / +2 dx dx + x =0

(2.316)

x+ =0

The ﬁrst term disappears because η (0) = η (1) = 0 at the boundaries. It would disappear, as well, if we had not prescribed η (x+) at the boundaries and, instead, had set the heat ﬂux there to zero, dϑ+/dx+ = 0. In both cases we get

1 + d2 ϑ + dI ϑˆ+ 2 2 + dx+ = 0 . η x −m h ϑ = dε dx+2

(2.317)

x+ =0

This equation can only be fulﬁlled for arbitrary functions η (x+ ) if the temperature proﬁle we seek satisﬁes (2.314) subject to the boundary conditions at x+ = 0 and x+ = 1, or for example, if a temperature is prescribed at one end of the boundary and vanishing heat ﬂux at the other end. In order to illustrate how a temperature proﬁle is found satisfying the FEM approach given by the integral (2.315), we consider a straight ﬁn with rectangular cross section. The analytical solution (2.72) for this temperature proﬁle is already known and will be used to verify the accuracy of the FEM approach. The unknown temperature proﬁle is approximated by a polygon consisting of + + straight lines according to Fig. 2.58. In each interval x+ i−1 ≤ x ≤ xi we have +

ϑ+ i −ϑi−1 ϑ+ x+ = ϑ+(i) x+ ∼ x+ −x+ . = ϑ+ i−1 + i−1 + Δxi

228

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Fig. 2.58: Approximation of the temperature proﬁle in a ﬁn by straight lines

The interval i contributes to the integral I the part xi +

I

(i)

1 = 2

x+ i−1

+ 2 +

2 ϑ+ ϑ+ i −ϑi−1 i −ϑi−1 2 2 + + + x −xi−1 dx+ , (2.318) + m h ϑi−1 + Δx+ Δx+ i i

and correspondingly the interval i + 1 contributes the part I (i+1)

1 = 2

x+ i+1

x+ i

2 + 2 + +

−ϑ −ϑ ϑ+ ϑ i+1 i i+1 i x+ −x+ dx+ . (2.319) + m2h2 ϑ+ i + i Δx+ Δx+ i i+1

The sum of all partial integrals yields I=

n %

+ + + + . I (k) = I ϑ+ 0 , ϑ1 , . . . , ϑi , ϑi+1 , . . . , ϑn

(2.320)

k=1

A necessary condition for its minimum are the n + 1 equations ∂I = 0; ∂ϑ+ i

i = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n

or their expanded versions ∂I ∂I (1) ∂I (2) ∂I (i) ∂I (i+1) ∂I (n) = + + . . . + + + . . . + = 0 ; i = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n . ∂ϑ+ ∂ϑ+ ∂ϑ+ ∂ϑ+ ∂ϑ+ ∂ϑ+ i i i i i i In these equations all terms disappear that do not contain ϑ+ i . As a consequence (i+1) / ∂ϑ+ only the two expressions ∂I (i) / ∂ϑ+ i and ∂I i remain and we obtain ∂I ∂I (i) ∂I (i+1) + =0 . + = ∂ϑi ∂ϑ+ ∂ϑ+ i i

(2.321)

2.5 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with the FEM-method

229

After some transformations if equidistant steps Δx+ are chosen diﬀerentiation of I (i) and I (i+1) with respect to ϑ+ i delivers + + ϑ+ i−1 + ϑi d + ϑi+1 = 0 ,

with the abbreviation d=

+ ϑ+ n−1 + ϑn d/2 = 0

(2.322)

2 (1 + 2 m2 h2 Δx+2 /6) . −1 + m2 h2 Δx+2 /6

The speciﬁed base temperature was ϑ+ 0 = 1. With (2.322) we have now n linear + + equations for the n unknown temperatures ϑ+ 1 , ϑ2 , . . . , ϑ n . As a numerical example we determine now the temperature proﬁle of a rectangular ﬁn with an insulated tip. As mesh size we choose Δx+ = 0.25. The four + + + + + unknown temperatures ϑ+ 1 (Δx = 0.25), ϑ2 (2Δx = 0.5), ϑ3 (3Δx = 0.75) and + + ϑ4 (4Δx = 1) are to be determined. From (2.322) we obtain the following equations: + = 0, 1 + ϑ+ 1 d + ϑ2

+ + ϑ+ 1 + ϑ2 d + ϑ3 = 0

+ + ϑ+ = 0, 2 + ϑ 3 d + ϑ4

+ ϑ+ 3 + ϑ4 d/2 = 0 .

Solution of these equations yields the temperatures:

= ϑ+ 1

d (3 − d2) , 2 − 4 d2 + d4

ϑ+ 2 =

d2 − 2 2 − 4 d2 + d4

ϑ+ = 3

−d , 2 − 4 d2 + d4

ϑ+ 4 =

2 . 2 − 4 d2 + d4

Table 2.13 gives numerical results for ﬁns with mh = 1 and mh = 2. They are compared with the results from the analytical solution according to (2.72). Table 2.13: Temperatures of a straight rectangular ﬁn calculated with the ﬁnite element method (FEM) and compared with the results of the analytical solution according to (2.72) ϑ+ 0 FEM Analyt. Solution

ϑ+ 2

ϑ+ 3

ϑ+ 4

1

0.8384 0.7297 0.6672 0.6468

1

0.8390 0.7308 0.6684 0.6480

1

0.6215 0.4051 0.2943 0.2604

1

0.6253 0.4102 0.2997 0.2658

mh = 1

FEM Analyt. Solution

ϑ+ 1

mh = 2

230

2.5.2

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

The ﬁnite element method applied to steady-state plane temperature ﬁelds

As stated in section 2.4.6.1, steady-state plane temperature ﬁelds ϑ (x, y) with heat sources obey the diﬀerential equation (2.306) ˙ ∂ 2ϑ ∂ 2 ϑ W =0 + 2+ 2 ∂x ∂y λ

(2.323)

Along the boundary Γ a ﬁnite convective heat transfer rate is prescribed Q˙ = αA (ϑ − ϑS ) , wherein the heat transfer coeﬃcient may vary along the boundary. The quantity ϑS is the temperature of the surroundings. Instead of solving the diﬀerential equation subject to the boundary conditions, we are searching now for the temperature proﬁle that minimizes the integral ⎧ ⎫ 2 2 ⎬ ˙ 1⎨ α ∂ϑ ∂ϑ W I= ϑ dx dy + (ϑ − ϑS )2 ds + −2 ⎭ 2⎩ ∂x ∂y λ λ Ω

(2.324)

Γ

Here ds is a line element of the boundary Γ and Ω is the planar domain of the temperature proﬁle. A proof of this statement is similar to that of the previous section 2.5.1. We abstain from giving it here and refer to [2.71]. In case that the heat is transferred by convection along a part Γ1 of the boundary, while along another part Γ2 a heat ﬂux is prescribed, the expression of (2.324) α (ϑ − ϑS )2 ds λ Γ

is replaced by

Γ1

α (ϑ − ϑS)2 ds + λ

q˙ ϑ ds . λ

Γ2

The second term of this relation disappears if the part Γ2 is adiabatic or if its temperatures are prescribed. Similarly the ﬁrst term disappears if instead of heat transfer rates the temperatures are speciﬁed along the part Γ1 .

2.5 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with the FEM-method

231

Example 2.10: With the aid of the ﬁnite element method we study the steady-state heat conduction inside a wall of thickness δ surrounding a room with a square base, Fig. 2.59. The results shall be compared with those of the ﬁnite diﬀerence method of example 2.8. Unlike example 2.8 we now also determine the temperatures along the left symmetry line, shown by a center plane marking.

Fig. 2.59: FEM-grid for wall of a room with a square base as in Fig. 2.50

The domain between the two center plane lines is covered by the triangular elements 1, 2, . . . , 16. Each of the temperatures ϑ+ j , j = 0, 1, . . . , 4 belongs to several triangles as shown in Table 2.14. ˙ . The same holds We seek the minimum of the integral (2.324). There are no heat sources W for the integral along the boundary Γ, because there is no convective speciﬁed heat ﬂow; instead the temperatures are given along Γ. With the dimensionless temperatures ϑ+ = (ϑ − ϑo ) / (ϑi − ϑo ) (index i=inside, index o=outside) and the dimensionless coordinates x+ = x / δ and y + = y / δ (2.324) converts into I=

1 2

∂ϑ+ ∂x+

2

+

∂ϑ+ ∂y +

2 dx+ dy + .

(2.325)

Ω+

Table 2.14: Triangles k = 1, 2, . . . , 16 corresponding to the temperatures ϑ+ j , j = 0, 1, . . . , 4 in Fig. 2.59 ϑ+ j j= 0 1 2 3 4

ϑ+ j is node point of triangles k k = 1, 1, 2, 3, 4,

13, 8 5, 2, 14, 6, 3, 15, 7, 4, 16, 12, 16

9, 10, 11,

13 14 15

The quantity Ω+ is the non-dimensional area of the solution. To each triangular element

232

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

we assign an integral I (k) , and it is I=

16 %

I (k) .

(2.326)

k=1

In order to calculate the integrals I (k) the derivatives ∂ϑ+ / ∂x+ and ∂ϑ+ / ∂y + are needed. They are approximated by their diﬀerence quotients given in Table 2.15. As Fig. 2.59 shows, the temperature ϑ+ 0 is a node point of the triangles 1, 13 and 8. Therefore ∂I ∂I (1) ∂I (13) ∂I (8) =0 . + = + + + + ∂ϑ0 ∂ϑ0 ∂ϑ0 ∂ϑ+ 0

Table 2.15: Temperature derivatives corresponding to the triangles k (∂ϑ+ / ∂x+ ) ∼ =

(∂ϑ+ / ∂y + ) ∼ =

+ ϑ+ k − ϑk−1

ϑ+ k−1 − 1

Δx+ k

Δyk+

5, 6, 7

0

ϑ+ k −1 Δyk+

8, 9, 10, 11, 12

0

triangles k k = 1, 2, 3, 4

0 − ϑ+ k−8 Δyk+

− ϑ+ k−13 Δx+ k

0 − ϑ+ k−12

ϑ+ k−12

13, 14, 15, 16

Δyk+

We obtain I (1)

I (13)

I (8)

=

=

=

1 2 1 2 1 2

Ω+ 1

+ ϑ+ 1 − ϑ0 + Δx1

Ω+ 13

Ω+ 8

2

+ ϑ+ 1 − ϑ0 + Δx13

ϑ+ 0 Δy8+

+

2

ϑ+ 0 −1 Δy1+

+

ϑ+ 1 + Δy13

2 dx+ dy + ,

2 dx+ dy + ,

2 dx+ dy + .

+ + + + + + According to Fig. 2.59, we have Δx+ 1 = Δx13 = Δx /2 and Δy1 = Δy13 = Δy8 = Δx . The areas of the triangles 1, 13 and 8 are the same. Thus, we ﬁnd

∂I ∂ϑ+ 0

=

∂I (1) ∂I (13) ∂I (8) + + + + ∂ϑ0 ∂ϑ0 ∂ϑ+ 0

= =

+ ϑ+ 1 − ϑ0

(Δx+/2)2 0 .

(−1) +

ϑ+ ϑ+ − ϑ + ϑ+ 0 −1 0 0 + 1 + 2 +2 + Δx Δx+2 (Δx /2)

Δx+2 4 (2.327)

2.5 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with the FEM-method

233

From this relation follows + 10 ϑ+ 0 − 8 ϑ1 − 1 = 0

(2.328)

ϑ+ 1

according to Table 2.14 is a node point of the triangles 1, 5, 2, 14, 9 The temperature and 13. Hence we have ∂I ∂I (1) ∂I (5) ∂I (2) ∂I (14) ∂I (9) ∂I (13) =0 . + = + + + + + + + + + + ∂ϑ1 ∂ϑ1 ∂ϑ1 ∂ϑ1 ∂ϑ1 ∂ϑ1 ∂ϑ+ 1 A similar calculation as before leads to + + − 2 ϑ+ 0 + 10 ϑ1 − 2 ϑ2 − 3 = 0 .

The formation of

while

∂I/∂3+

and from

∂I/∂ϑ+ 2

(2.329)

= 0 yields + + − 2 ϑ+ 1 + 8 ϑ2 − 2 ϑ3 − 2 = 0 ,

(2.330)

+ + − 2 ϑ+ 2 + 8 ϑ3 − 2 ϑ4 − 2 = 0,

(2.331)

= 0 delivers

∂I/∂4+

= 0 we obtain + − 2 ϑ+ 3 + ϑ4 = 0 .

(2.332)

As a solution of the set of equations (2.328) to (2.332), we ﬁnd the temperatures ϑ+ 0 = 0.4961

ϑ+ 1 = 0.4951

ϑ+ 2 = 0.4795

ϑ+ 3 = 0.4227

ϑ+ 4 = 0.2114 .

They diﬀer only slightly from those obtained with the ﬁnite diﬀerence method of example 2.8: ϑ+ ϑ+ ϑ+ ϑ+ 1 = 0.4930 2 = 0.4789 3 = 0.4225 4 = 0.2113 . Also the shape factor Sb = 12.85 of example 2.8 changes only slightly. It becomes Sb = 12.87 for this ﬁnite element calculation. Example 2.11: The inner wall of an industrial furnace consists of ﬁre bricks. It is insuﬃciently grouted, so that the 500 ◦ C hot gas can penetrate into the cracks between the bricks. How much does the heat loss increase due to this eﬀect? The calculation procedure is based on the grid with equal distances between neighbouring node points as outlined in Fig. 2.60 For reasons of symmetry the ﬁgure shows only half of the wall. The side-length is δ = 1 m. The thermal conductivity of the ﬁre bricks is λ = 10 W/Km. Outside, heat is transferred to the ambient air. The heat transfer coeﬃcient is α = 10 W/m2 K. The width of the crack can be neglected in comparison to its length. The following dimensionless quantities are introduced into (2.324): ϑ+ = (ϑ − ϑe ) / (ϑi − ϑe ), where ϑe = 20 ◦ C is the external air temperature and ϑi = 500 ◦ C is the inside temperature of the hot gases. Furthermore we introduce x+ = x/δ + + and y + = y/δ. Determine the ﬁve temperatures ϑ+ 5 , ϑ6 , . . ., ϑ9 . Given are the internal + + + surface temperatures ϑ1 = ϑ2 = ϑ3 = 1, and the temperature ϑ+ 4 = 1 inside the crack. For the triangular elements k = 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 we have: + 2 + 2 ∂ϑ 1 ∂ϑ dx+ dy + . + I +(k) = 2 ∂x+ ∂y + Ω+ k

From the elements 5 and 7 heat is transferred to the ambient air, so that

234

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

I +(k) =

1 2

∂ϑ+ ∂x+

2

+

∂ϑ+ ∂y +

2 dx+ dy + + Bi ϑ+2 y + =1 ,

k = 5, 7 .

Ω+ k

The following triangular elements are associated with the temperatures ϑ+ i as shown in Fig. 2.60. ϑ+ i

i =1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

is node point of the triangles k

k =1,2

2,3,4

4

5,6,1

6,7,8, 3,2,1

8,4,3

5

5,6,7

7,8

ϑ+ i

Fig. 2.60: Wall of an industrial furnace with open crack. Rough grid for FEMcalculation

I +(1) =

1 2

I +(2) =

1 2

.. . I

+(5)

1 = 2

+ ϑ+ 5 −ϑ4 + Δx + ϑ+ 2 −ϑ5 + Δx

2 2

Δx+2 2 Δx+2 2

+ Δx 2 2 + 2 + + ϑ8 −ϑ+ ϑ+ ϑ+ Δx+2 + 4 −ϑ7 7 8 −ϑ7 + + + Bi ϑ + x dx+ . 7 Δx+ Δx+ 2 Δx+

x+ =0

The Biot number is Bi =

αδ 10 W/m2 K · 1m = = 10 λ 1 W/ Km

2.5 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with the FEM-method

235

and Δx+ = 0.5 . After integration the partial integral I +(5) and the following integrals can be evaluated to 2 + 2 + ϑ+ Δx+ +2 + + +2

1 ϑ8 −ϑ+ Δx+2 +(5) 4 −ϑ7 7 +Bi ϑ7 +ϑ7 ϑ8 +ϑ8 I = + 2 Δx+ Δx+ 2 3 .. . 2 + 2 + ϑ+ Δx+2 1 ϑ8 −ϑ+ +(8) 6 −ϑ5 9 . I = + 2 Δx+ Δx+ 2 We next develop the set of ﬁve algebraic equations to be solved. In order to determine the + unknown temperature ϑ+ 5 we form the sum of all integrals containing ϑ5 . According to the previous table these are the integrals I +(6) , I +(7) , I +(8) , I +(3) , I +(2) , und I +(1) . Thus we get: ∂I + ∂I +(6) ∂I +(7) ∂I +(8) ∂I +(3) ∂I +(2) ∂I +(1) =0 + = + + + + + + + + + + ∂ϑ5 ∂ϑ5 ∂ϑ5 ∂ϑ5 ∂ϑ5 ∂ϑ5 ∂ϑ+ 5 giving ϑ+ 5 −

1 + 1 + 1 ϑ − ϑ8 = . 4 6 4 2

(2.333)

In a similar way we generate: ∂I +(8) ∂I +(4) ∂I +(3) ∂I + =0 . + = + + + + ∂ϑ6 ∂ϑ6 ∂ϑ6 ∂ϑ+ 6 and consequently: + ϑ+ 5 − 2 ϑ6 +

From

∂I + /∂ϑ+ 7

=

∂I +(5) /∂ϑ+ 7

1 + 1 ϑ = . 2 9 2

(2.334)

= 0 we obtain: ϑ+ 7 −

1 + ϑ = 0.1875 . 8 8

(2.335)

+(5) +(6) +(7) ∂I + /∂ϑ+ /∂ϑ+ /∂ϑ+ /∂ϑ+ 8 = ∂I 8 + ∂I 8 + ∂I 8 = 0 yields:

ϑ+ 5 −

1 + 16 + 1 + ϑ − ϑ − ϑ9 = 0 . 3 7 3 8 3

(2.336)

+(7) +(8) ∂I + /∂ϑ+ /∂ϑ+ /∂ϑ+ 9 = ∂I 9 + ∂I 9 = 0 leads to:

ϑ+ 6 −

2 + 16 + ϑ − ϑ =0 . 3 8 3 9

(2.337)

The solution of the system of the linear equations (2.333) to (2.337) yields the temperatures: + + + + ϑ+ 5 = 0.6817, ϑ6 = 0.6163, ϑ7 = 0.1737, ϑ8 = 0.1106, ϑ9 = 0.1017 .

or in Celsius temperatures: ϑ5 = 347.2 ◦ C, ϑ6 = 315.8 ◦ C, ϑ7 = 103.4 ◦ C, ϑ8 = 73.09 ◦ C, ϑ9 = 68.82 ◦ C . The heat ﬂow rate to the ambient air is δ ϑ8 + ϑ9 ϑ7 + ϑ 8 Q˙ = α b 2 . − ϑe + 2 − ϑe 2 2 2

236

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Substitution and rearrangement gives:

˙ = α δ (ϑi − ϑe ) ϑ+ + 2 ϑ+ + ϑ+ = 1192 W/m . Q/b 7 8 9 2 Without the crack the heat ﬂow would be −1 1 W ˙ = k 2 δ (ϑi − ϑe ) , k = δ + 1 = , Q/b λ δ 1.1 m2 K

˙ = 872 W/m Q/b

The heat loss caused by the crack is ˙ ≈ (1192 − 872) W/m = 320 W/m Q/b L

Remark: In order not to overload the calculation procedure and to make it more easily understandable, we have chosen a rough grid. The results obtained here should be considered with some caution. If we had chosen a much ﬁner grid, then we would obtain instead ˙ = 1192 W/m a heat loss of Q/b ˙ = 1062 W/m. The heat loss then would amount to of Q/b ˙ L = (1062 − 872) W/m = 190 W/m, but is still notable. (Q/b)

2.5.3

The ﬁnite element method applied to transient, geometrical one-dimensional heat conduction problems

The ﬁnite element method is presented here for the solution of transient, geometrical one-dimensional problems assuming constant material properties. As stated before, the computational eﬀort is higher than that of ﬁnite diﬀerence methods; in exchange the ﬁnite element method facilitates the study of complex geometrical structures. As in chapter 2.4.1.1 we wish to solve the heat conduction equation ∂ϑ ∂ 2ϑ (2.338) =a 2 ∂t ∂x in the range x0 ≤ x ≤ xn and for times t ≥ 0. Boundary and initial conditions are: t=0

:

ϑ (t, x) = ϑ0

x=0

:

∂ϑ/∂x = 0

x=δ

:

−λ (∂ϑ/∂x) = α (ϑ − ϑe ) ,

(2.339)

Here, half of the plate thickness is δ, and the coordinate r is replaced by x. The temperature proﬁle ϑ (t, x) which satisﬁes (2.338) and the boundary values (2.339) shall be determined. As proved in the variational calculus this temperature proﬁle minimizes the integral ⎫ ⎧ δ 2 ⎬ 1⎨ ∂ϑ 1 ∂ ϑ2 α I= (2.340) + dx + (ϑ − ϑe )2x=δ ⎭ 2⎩ ∂x a ∂t λ x=0

2.5 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with the FEM-method

237

Instead of solving (2.338) subject to the boundary conditions (2.339) we can therefore search for the temperature proﬁle that minimizes the integral (2.340). As already mentioned in section 2.5.2, if the heat ﬂux along the surface is constant and prescribed, then the term α (ϑ − ϑe )2x=δ λ should be replaced by q˙ ϑ . λ Both terms vanish in the case of constant surface temperatures. If heat sources ˙ (x) are active, the expression W ˙ W ϑ λ should be added to the term in the square brackets of (2.340). Example 2.12: In order to illustrate the application of the method to transient problems, we study the cooling of a steel plate of uniform initial temperature ϑ0 . At time t0 the surface of the plate comes into contact with a cold ﬂuid of external temperature ϑe ≺ ϑ0 on both sides. Thermophysical properties and heat transfer coeﬃcient are the same as in example 2.6. The results obtained with the method of the ﬁnite elements shall be compared with those of the ﬁnite diﬀerence method, example 2.7. Unlike the ﬁnite diﬀerence calculation according to Fig. 2.46, there is no need to place a boundary outside the plate at x0 = x1 −Δ x. Instead this boundary coincides now with the symmetry axis x0 as shown in Fig. 2.61, where the boundary condition ∂ϑ /∂x = 0 shall be satisﬁed. As depicted in Fig. 2.61 the grid chosen in the ﬁrst section is Δx/2 = 15 mm and Δx = 30 mm in the following sections.

Fig. 2.61: Cooling of a plate of thickness 2δ = 270 mm. FEM-grid

238

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

In (2.340) the following dimensionless quantities are used: ϑ+ =

ϑ − ϑe ; ϑ0 − ϑe

t+ =

at ; δ2

x+ =

x ; δ

I+ = I

δ (ϑ0 − ϑe )

2

and

Bi =

αδ . λ

With them (2.340) is transformed into I+ =

1 2

2 1 ∂ ϑ+2 ∂ϑ+ 1 1 + dx + dx+ + Bi ϑ+2 x+ =1 . ∂x+ 2 ∂t+ 2 x+ =0 12 3 0 12 3 I +(α) I +(β)

1 x+ =0

0

(2.341)

Here the partial integral I +(β) can be written I +(β) =

1 2

1 x+ =0

1 ∂ ϑ+2 1 d + dx = ϑ+2 dx+ . ∂t+ 2 dt+ x+ =0

+

The transformation from the partial derivative ∂/∂t to the total derivative d/dt+ is 41 +2 + permitted, because after integration the integral ϑ dx becomes independent of the x+ =0

local coordinate x+ . (2.341) therefore may be written in the form I+ =

1 2

1 x+ =0

∂ϑ+ ∂x+

2 dx+ +

1 d 2 dt+

1 ϑ+2 dx+ + x+ =0

1 Bi ϑ+2 x+ =1 . 2

(2.342)

This integral is now split into the contributions of sections k = 1, 2, . . . , 5 according to Fig. 2.61 5 % I+ = I +(k) . k=1

Linearising the x-dependent temperature proﬁle of the ﬁrst section of Fig. 2.61, one ﬁnds I +(1)

1 = 2

+ Δx /2

x+ =0

+ ϑ+ 1 − ϑ0 + Δx /2

2

1 d dx+ + 2 dx+

+ Δx /2

ϑ+ 0 + x+ =0

+ ϑ+ 1 − ϑ0 x+ + Δx /2

2 dx+

and after integration

+ 2 1 ϑ+ 1 Δx+ + ˙ + 1 − ϑ0 + + ˙+ + ˙+ 2 ϑ0 ϑ0 + ϑ˙ + + . I +(1) = 0 ϑ1 + ϑ0 ϑ1 + 2 ϑ1 ϑ1 + 2 Δx /2 2 6 The overdot stands for the derivative with respect to time. Diﬀerentiation with respect to the unknown temperature ϑ+ 0 leads to + ∂I +(1) ϑ+ 1 Δx+ ˙ + 0 − ϑ1 2 ϑ0 + ϑ˙ + + . 1 + = + Δx /2 2 6 ∂ϑ0

As Fig. 2.61 shows, ϑ+ 0 appears only in the ﬁrst section. Hence we have ∂I + ∂I +(1) =0 , + = ∂ϑ0 ∂ϑ+ 0 and from this + ϑ+ 0 − ϑ1 +

Δx+2 ˙ + 2 ϑ0 + ϑ˙ + =0 . 1 6

(2.343)

2.5 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with the FEM-method

239

Sections i = 2, 3 and 4 are analogous to one another, now with step size Δx+ :

I

+(i)

+ Δx

1 = 2

+ ϑ+ i − ϑi−1 Δx+

2

+ Δx

1 d dx + 2 dt+

ϑ+ i−1

+

x+ =0

ϑ+ − ϑ + i−1 + + i x Δx+

dx+ .

x+ =0

Diﬀerentiation at node x1 gives the eﬀect of ϑ1 as: ∂I + ∂I +(1) ∂I +(2) =0 . + = + + ∂ϑ1 ∂ϑ1 ∂ϑ+ 1 After some transformations, the evaluation of the derivatives gives the algebraic form 2 3 + 1 + 1 Δx+ ˙+ ˙+ = 0 . ϑ1 − ϑ2 + ϑ˙ + (2.344) − ϑ+ 0 + 0 + 6 ϑ1 + 2 ϑ2 2 2 6 2 Likewise at x2 one has

∂I +(2) ∂I +(3) ∂I + = 0, + = + + ∂ϑ2 ∂ϑ2 ∂ϑ+ 2

which can be evaluated as + + − ϑ+ 1 + 2 ϑ2 − ϑ3 +

1 ˙+ ˙+ = 0 . Δx+2 ϑ˙ + 1 + 4 ϑ2 + ϑ 3 6

(2.345)

The derivative at x3 gives ∂I + ∂I +(3) ∂I +(4) = = 0, + + ∂ϑ+ ∂ϑ ∂ϑ+ 3 3 3 which becomes + + − ϑ+ 2 + 2 ϑ3 − ϑ4 +

1 ˙+ ˙+ = 0 Δx+2 ϑ˙ + 2 + 4 ϑ3 + ϑ 4 6

(2.346)

Analogously, at x4 we have ∂I + ∂I +(4) ∂I +(5) =0 + = + + ∂ϑ4 ∂ϑ4 ∂ϑ+ 4 giving 1 ˙+ ˙+ = 0 . (2.347) Δx+2 ϑ˙ + 3 + 4 ϑ4 + ϑ 5 6 + The temperature ϑ5 appears only in section 5. After linearising the temperature proﬁle for this section (2.342) leads to the following partial integral + + − ϑ+ 3 + 2 ϑ4 − ϑ5 +

I

+(5)

=

Δx +

1 2

+ ϑ+ 5 − ϑ4 + Δx

2

1 d dx + 2 dt+

x+ =0

+

Δx +

ϑ+ 4 +

+

x+ =0

1 Bi ϑ+2 x+ =1 . 2

Diﬀerentiation with respect to ϑ+ 5 gives ∂I + ∂I +(5) = 0, + = ∂ϑ5 ∂ϑ+ 5

+ ϑ+ 5 − ϑ4 Δx+ + Δx

2 dx+ +

240

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

which leads to the equation

+ 1 + ˙+ = 0 . ϑ5 + Δx+2 ϑ˙ + − ϑ+ 4 + 1 + Bi Δx 4 + 2 ϑ5 6

(2.348)

With (2.343) to (2.348) we have six ordinary diﬀerential equations with the six unknown + + temperatures ϑ+ 0 , ϑ1 , . . . , ϑ5 which are functions of time. They can be transformed into a system of linear algebraic equations by means of the Laplace Transform. Solving these equations and performing the inverse Laplace Transform L ϑ+ i , i = 0, 1, . . . , 5 yields the + + unknown time-dependent temperatures ϑ+ 0 , ϑ 1 , . . . , ϑ5 . The uncomplicated but elaborate calculations can be done with a computer program, such as Mathematica or MathCad. Here, we deal with the results obtained for a step size Δx+ = 30 mm/135 mm = 6/27 and a Biot number of

Bi =

αδ 75 W/m2 K · 135 · 10−3 m = = 0.675 . λ 15 W/Km

+ + + + At the discrete positions x+ = 0, x+ 1 = Δx /2, xi+1 = (Δx /2) + i Δx , i = 1, 2, 3, 4 we obtain expressions of the form

5

%

+ = . ϑ+ t+ , x+ aj x+ i i exp −αj t

(2.349)

j=0

Their coeﬃcients are given in Table 2.16.

Table 2.16: Coeﬃcients of equation (2.349) α0

α1

α2

α3

α4

α5

0.5733 12.4277 49.3350 120.0466 222.2537 715.6565 aj

aj x+ 0

aj x+ 1

aj x+ 2

aj x+ 3

aj x+ 4

aj x+ 5

j=0

j=1

j=2

j=3

j=4

j=5

1.0910

-0.1177

0.0400

-0.0197

0.0070

-0.0005

1.0872

-0.1089

0.0289

-0.0080

0.0004

0.0004

1.0616

-0.0572

-0.0177

0.0206

-0.0073

-0.00015

1.0061

0.0264

-0.0336

-0.0122

0.0132

0.00005

0.9223

0.0953

0.0086

-0.0086

-0.0176

-0.00002

0.8124

0.1111

0.0359

0.0206

0.0199

0.00001

2.5 Numerical solution to heat conduction problems with the FEM-method

241

Table 2.17: Comparison of temperatures from the ﬁnite element method (ﬁrst line) with those of example 2.7 from the Crank-Nicolson method (second line) and the results of the exact solution (third line) ϑ+ 0

t/s

ϑ+ 1

ϑ+ 2

ϑ+ 3

ϑ+ 4

ϑ+ 5

240

1.0000 1.0000 0.9995 0.9894 0.9489 0.8531 0.9990 0.9990 0.9969 0.9885 0.9573 0.8406 0.9998 0.9997 0.9976 0.9861 0.9459 0.8510

960

0.9641 0.9614 0.9430 0.9007 0.8317 0.7350 0.9636 0.9636 0.9437 0.9013 0.8322 0.7356 0.9654 0.9629 0.9427 0.8998 0.8309 0.7343

9600

0.3516 0.3503 0.3421 0.3242 0.2972 0.2618 0.3683 0.3683 0.3584 0.3387 0.3099 0.2727 0.3696 0.3684 0.3584 0.3389 0.3101 0.2730

In Table 2.17 the temperatures determined with the ﬁnite element method (ﬁrst line) are compared with those of the ﬁnite diﬀerence method of Crank- Nicolson (second line), and with the results of the exact solution according to (2.171) (third line).

2.5.4

Extension to transient, geometrical two-dimensional heat conduction problems

Transient, two-dimensional problems contain the additional term (∂ϑ/∂y)2 in the ˙ (x, y) are present, square bracket of (2.340), and furthermore, when heat sources W ˙ /λ ϑ. Integration must be performed over the two-dimensional area the term −W Ω with dΩ = dx dy. The border of the area is Γ and a line element of the border is ds. Across the border the heat ﬂow is Q˙ =

α (ϑ − ϑe ) b ds . Γ

Sought now is the temperature proﬁle ϑ (t, x, y) that minimizes the integral 1 I= 2

Ω

∂ϑ ∂x

2

∂ϑ + ∂y

2

˙ 1 ∂ (ϑ2 ) W α + − ϑ dx dy + (ϑ − ϑe )2 ds (2.350) a δt λ λ Γ

We abstain here from a proof and refer the reader to [2.71]. In the case where heat is transferred by convection only along a part Γ1 of the border, whereas along another part Γ2 a heat ﬂux q˙ is presciribed, then again the explanations given at the end of chapter 2.5.3apply. The solution area may be subdivided into triangular or quadrangular elements. The solution procedure is similar to that described in the previous chapter.

242

2.6

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Mass diﬀusion

The basis for the solution of mass diﬀusion problems, which go beyond the simple case of steady-state and one-dimensional diﬀusion, sections 1.4.1 and 1.4.2, is the diﬀerential equation for the concentration ﬁeld in a quiescent medium. It is known as the mass diﬀusion equation. As mass diﬀusion means the movement of particles, a quiescent medium may only be presumed for special cases which we will discuss ﬁrst in the following sections. In a similar way to the heat conduction in section 2.1, we will discuss the derivation of the mass diﬀusion equation in general terms in which the concentration dependence of the material properties and chemical reactions will be considered. This will show that a large number of mass diﬀusion problems can be described by diﬀerential equations and boundary conditions, just like in heat conduction. Therefore, we do not need to solve many new mass diﬀusion problems, we can merely transfer the results from heat conduction to the analogue mass diﬀusion problem. This means that mass diﬀusion problem solutions can be illustrated in a short section. At the end of the section a more detailed discussion of steady-state and transient mass diﬀusion with chemical reactions is included.

2.6.1

Remarks on quiescent systems

The following observations show that in contrast with heat conduction, mass diﬀusion processes seldom occur in quiescent systems. Therefore mass diﬀusion in quiescent systems has less practical meaning compared to heat conduction. We understand mass diﬀusion to be mass transport as a result of the natural movement of molecules from one region of a system to another. Correspondingly, heat conduction can be described as the energy transport due to the statistical movement of elementary particles caused by an irregular temperature distribution. In this respect a close relationship between mass diﬀusion and heat conduction exists. In contrast to heat conduction, in mass diﬀusion the average velocity of the particles of the individual materials in a volume element can be diﬀerent from each other, so that a relative movement of the individual particles to each other is macroscopically perceptible. In general this results in a macroscopic movement of all particles in a volume element and therefore convection. As these considerations show, in contrast to heat conduction quiescent systems cannot always be assumed for mass diﬀusion. This can only be assumed under certain conditions, which we will now discuss. We will limit ourselves to a discussion of systems where the reference velocity for the determination of the mass diﬀusional ﬂux disappears, cf. (1.153). As a

2.6 Mass diﬀusion

243

reference velocity we chose the gravitational velocity according to (1.154), % w = K w K , (2.351) K

and the average molar velocity u according to (1.157), which we will write in the following form % cu = cK w K . (2.352) K

Vanishing gravitational velocity w = 0 at every position has % K wK = 0

(2.353)

K

as a result overall in the observed system. The mass ﬂow into the volume element has to be exactly the same size as the ﬂow rate out of the element, so that (2.353) is satisﬁed. The mass in the volume element, therefore remains unchanged. The density of a volume element in a particular position is also constant. It can, however, be diﬀerent for an element in a diﬀerent position x. This means that ∂/∂x = 0 is possible but ∂/∂t = 0. Vanishing gravitational velocity w = 0 merely has the result ∂/∂t = 0, but not ∂/∂x = 0. The model considered here is that of an incompressible body. This is deﬁned by the fact that the density of a volume element in the material does not change during its movement, i.e. = (x, t) = const and therefore d/dt = 0, which is fulﬁlled in our case, because due to w = 0 and ∂/∂t = 0 d ∂ ∂ = +w =0 . dt ∂t ∂x As an example we will take a porous body into which hydrogen diﬀuses. A volume element in the porous body has a certain mass and therefore a certain density, e.g. = 7.8 · 103 kg/m3 . According to this a volume element of 1 mm3 has a mass of 7.8 · 10−3 g. We assume that the volume element is at the ambient temperature 298 K with a partial pressure of hydrogen of p = 1 hPa. The equation of state for ideal gases is used to ﬁnd the hydrogen absorbed by the volume element, which is MH2 =

102 Pa · 10−9 m3 pH 2 V = R H2 T 4.1245 (J/gK) · 298 K MH2 = 8.136 · 10−11 g .

The mass of the element is hardly changed due to the added hydrogen, and so any mass change can be neglected. The centre of mass remains in the same position in space, a good approximation is dx/dt = w = 0. Similar results are obtained for mass diﬀusion in very dilute solutions, for example the absorption of a gas in a liquid. The density of the liquid, away from the critical region, is much larger than that of the gas, and the mass of the gas is extraordinarily low. This means that the mass of a volume element is practically unchanged by the absorption of gas. Once again, a good approximation is dx/dt = w = 0.

244

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Vanishing gravitational velocity and therefore a medium, quiescent relative to the gravitational velocity, can be presumed for the diﬀusion of gases into solids or diﬀusion in very dilute solutions. We will now look at a system, in which the average molar velocity u according to (2.352) disappears. This gives %

cK w K = 0 .

(2.354)

K

The sum of all the molar ﬂows into a volume element is equal to the sum of all the ﬂows out of the element. The diﬀusion is equimolar. The number of moles N in the volume element remains unchanged. Therefore the molar density lim N/V = c at V →0 a ﬁxed position is constant. It can change with position x but ∂c/∂t = 0. We will consider the vessel in Fig. 2.62, as an example. The left hand side contains 0.5 ˜ = 4 kg/kmol), whilst the right half contains 0.5 mol Ar (M ˜ = 40 kg/kmol), at mol He (M p = 0.1 MPa and T = 298 K. When the separating wall is removed the gases diﬀuse into each other. The pressure and temperature remain constant. The ideal gas equation holds for every volume element, p N = = c = const . Rm T V Therefore ∂c =0 , ∂t which is only possible if the amount of material ﬂowing into each volume element is equal to the amount of the other material ﬂowing out of the element: (cw)He = −(cw)Ar . The average molar velocity, according to (2.352) is u = 0. As the pressure, temperature and

Fig. 2.62: Equimolar diﬀusion of two gases, a centre of mass before, and b after mixing

number of moles for each gas were the same before mixing, both gases ﬁlled the same volume. Before mixing the centre of mass lay on the side of the heavier argon, point a in Fig. 2.62. A homogeneous distribution develops after mixing has taken place, causing the centre of mass to move to the middle of the vessel, point b in Fig. 2.62, and the gravitational velocity is diﬀerent from zero. In the example considered here the average molar velocity is u = 0, on the other hand the gravitational velocity is w = 0.

Vanishing average molar velocity and a system quiescent relative to the average molar velocity can be presumed, as the example indicates for the mass diﬀusion of ideal gases at constant pressure and temperature.

2.6 Mass diﬀusion

2.6.2

245

Derivation of the diﬀerential equation for the concentration ﬁeld

The solving of a diﬀusion problem involves the determination of the composition of a body in terms of time and space. If the composition is indicated by the mass fraction and we wish to investigate the mass fraction ξA = MA /M of material A, we are looking for ξA = ξA (x, t) . With this equation and Fick’s law the diﬀusional ﬂux can be discovered. For a binary mixture of components A and B, (1.161) this is j ∗A = − D grad ξA

(2.355)

and for a multi-component mixture, (1.162): j ∗A =

N % ˜ AM ˜K M DAK grad x˜K ˜ M2 K=1

(2.356)

K=A

˜ ξA /M ˜ A according to (1.151) and the average molar with the mole fraction x˜A = M ˜ mass according to M from (1.154).

Fig. 2.63: Input of substance A by diﬀusion and production by a chemical reaction in volume V . a for the mass balance, b for the molar balance

The mass fraction ξA is obtained as the solution to a partial diﬀerential equation, which comes from the mass balance. In order to derive this we will consider a coherent region of any size, out of which we will imaginarily cut a body in which diﬀusion takes place, Fig. 2.63a. The volume of the region is V , and its surface area A. A surface element dA, whose normal n is directed outwards as in Fig. 2.63a, has a mass ﬂow dM˙ A = −A wA n dA (2.357) fed into it. The minus sign is used as a mass ﬂow is deemed to be positive when it ﬂows into the region. The velocity vector wA of substance A points inwards in

246

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

the region, whilst the normal vector n points outwards, so the scalar product will be negative. The diﬀusional ﬂux, according to (1.155), is deﬁned by j ∗A := A (w A − w) . We will deal with a quiescent medium relative to the gravitational velocity, w = 0, so that the diﬀusional ﬂux is j ∗A = A wA . (2.358) It follows from (2.357) and (2.358) that dM˙ A = −j ∗A n dA . Integration gives the total inlet mass ﬂow of the component ∗ ˙ MA = − j A n dA = − div j ∗A dV (A)

(2.359)

(V )

This will then be converted from the integral over the whole surface area of the region to the volume integral of the divergence j ∗A according to Gauss’ integral theorem. At the same time a certain amount of substance A is generated or absorbed by a chemical reaction inside the region. The production rate in a volume element is indicated by Γ˙ A (SI units kg/m3 s). It is positive when substance A is generated, and negative when it is consumed. The mass ﬂow (2.360) Γ˙ A dV (V )

of substance A is generated inside the region. The mass ﬂow over the surface area of the region due to diﬀusion and the ﬂow generated by the chemical reaction cause an increase over time of the mass stored inside the region by d ∂A A dV = dV . (2.361) dt ∂t (V )

(V )

Taking into account (2.359) and (2.360) the mass balance for substance A is (V )

∂A dV = − ∂t

(V )

div j ∗A dV +

Γ˙ A dV .

(V )

As the balance region can be inﬁnitely small, it holds that ∂A = −div j ∗A + Γ˙ A . ∂t

(2.362)

2.6 Mass diﬀusion

247

A mass balance of this type is valid for each component in the mixture. Therefore, there are as many mass balances as substances. Addition of all the components leads to N N N % % % ∂K j ∗K + (2.363) Γ˙ K . = −div ∂t K=1 K=1 K=1 In which

N 5

K = is the density of a mixture of N substances. The sum of all

K=1

N 5

the diﬀusional ﬂuxes is given by (1.156), i.e.

j ∗K = 0. As the mass of a certain

K=1

substance generated per unit time in the chemical reaction can only be as much as is consumed of another substance, it follows that N %

Γ˙ K = 0 .

K=1

The summation over all substances, according to (2.363), leads to ∂ =0 . ∂t The density at a given position does not change with time. This is stipulated because we have presumed a quiescent medium w = 0. However the density is only constant at a ﬁxed position. It can change locally due to a diﬀerent composition, = (x). As the density is independent of time, (2.362) may, because A = ξA , also be written as ∂ξA (2.364) = −div j ∗A + Γ˙ A . ∂t Introducing Fick’s law (2.355) gives

∂ξA = div( D grad ξA ) + Γ˙ A ∂t

(2.365)

as the desired diﬀerential equation for the mass fraction ξA (x, t) in a quiescent, relative to the gravitational velocity, isotropic binary mixture of substances A and B. A corresponding equation also exists for B. However this does not need to be solved, because when the mass fraction ξA is known, the other mass fraction in a binary mixture is ξB = 1 − ξA . Putting Fick’s law (2.356) into (2.364) provides us with the corresponding equation to (2.365) for a mixture of N components N % ˜ AM ˜K ∂ξA M = −div( DAK grad x˜K ) + Γ˙ A . ˜2 ∂t M K=1

(2.366)

K=A

As we have presumed a quiescent body relative to the gravitational velocity, w = 0 and therefore ∂/∂t = 0, the quantities D and Γ˙ A in (2.365) depend on the density

248

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

(x), the temperature ϑ and the composition ξA . In (2.366) these quantities do not only depend on the mass fraction ξA of component A, but also on the mass fractions of the other substances. In addition grad x˜A also depends on the gradients of the mass fractions of the other substances, which follow from ˜ ξA /M ˜ A with 1/M ˜ = 5 ξK /M ˜K. x˜A = M K

Therefore the diﬀusion equations (2.365) and (2.366) are, in general, nonlinear. The general equation (2.366), contains (2.365) as a special case with N = 2, which can be easily checked. We will now presuppose a quiescent system relative to the average molar velocity u, with constant temperature and pressure, and derive the diﬀusion equation. The molar ﬂow of component A into the surface element dA, as in Fig. 2.63b is dN˙ A = −cA wA n dA .

(2.367)

The minus sign appears because the normal vector n points outwards from the area dA, and the molar ﬂow into the area should be positive. The diﬀusional ﬂux is deﬁned by (1.158) as u j A = cA (w A − u) and is equal to the molar ﬂux uj A

= cA w A ,

(2.368)

because we have presumed a vanishing average molar velocity u. The molar ﬂow into the total area is ˙ NA = − cA wA n dA = − u j A n dA = − div u j A dV . (2.369) (A)

(A)

(V )

The amount of substance A generated by chemical reaction in the region is indicated by the molar production ﬂux γ˙ A (SI units mol/m3 s). It is γ˙ A dV . (2.370) (V )

The molar ﬂow into the region due to diﬀusion and that generated by the chemical reaction cause an increase over time in the amount of substance stored in the region of d ∂cA dV . (2.371) cA dV = dt ∂t (V )

(V )

The material balance for substance A is then ∂cA dV = − div u j A dV + γ˙ A dV . ∂t (V )

(V )

(V )

2.6 Mass diﬀusion

249

As the balance region can be chosen to be inﬁnitely small, it holds that ∂cA (2.372) = −div u j A + γ˙ A . ∂t A balance of this type exists for all the substances involved in the diﬀusion, so they can be added together giving N N N % % % ∂cK γ˙ K . = −div ujK + ∂t K=1 K=1 K=1

Here

N 5

(2.373)

cK = c is the molar density of a mixture consisting of N substances.

K=1

Furthermore if

N 5

uj K

= 0, cf. section 1.4.1, (2.373) is transformed into the

K=1

following equation valid for the sum over all components N ∂c % γ˙ K . = ∂t K=1

(2.374)

As the sum of the number of moles does not generally remain the same in a chemical reaction, the right hand side of (2.374) does not disappear unless exactly the same number of moles are generated as disappear. Inserting Fick’s law (1.160), in which DAB is replaced by D, we obtain from (2.372) ∂cA (2.375) = div(c D grad x˜A ) + γ˙ A ∂t as the diﬀerential equation for the molar concentration cA (x, t) in a quiescent, relative to the average molar velocity u, binary mixture of components A and B. A corresponding equation exists for substance B. It is also possible to solve (2.375) and then determine cB , because cB = c − cA . For a multicomponent mixture of ideal gases at constant temperature and pressure, Fick’s law in the particle reference system [2.75], can be written as ujA

=

N %

DAK grad cK .

(2.376)

K=1 K=A

Putting this into (2.372) we obtain for a multicomponent mixture at constant pressure and temperature, the diﬀusion equation N % ∂cA = −div( DAK grad cK ) + γ˙ A . ∂t K=1

(2.377)

K=A

In (2.375) D = D(p, ϑ, x˜A ) is the diﬀusion coeﬃcient and the molar production density is γ˙ A = γ˙ A (p, ϑ, x˜A ) with x˜A = cA /c. In (2.377) these quantities depend not only on the mole fraction x˜A , but also on the mole fractions of the other substances.

250

2.6.3

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

Simpliﬁcations

We will still only deal with binary mixtures in the following, as the diﬀusion coeﬃcients DAK of mixtures of more than two components are often unknown, and therefore the diﬀusion in these mixtures cannot be quantitatively calculated. The diﬀusion equations (2.365) and (2.375) for binary mixtures can often be simpliﬁed considerably. We have already ascertained that in the diﬀusion of a gas A into a solid or liquid B, the density of a volume element is practically unchanged, ∂/∂t = 0, because the mass of the gas absorbed is low in comparison with the mass of the volume element. If substance B was initially homogeneous, = (x) = const, the density will also be unchanged locally during the diﬀusion process. We can therefore say, a good approximation is that the density is constant, independently of position and time. Furthermore, measurements [2.76] have shown that the diﬀusion coeﬃcient in dilute liquid solutions at constant temperature may be taken as approximately constant. Equally in diﬀusion of a gas into a homogeneous, porous solid at constant temperature, the diﬀusion coeﬃcient is taken to be approximately constant, as the concentration only changes within very narrow limits. In these cases, in which = const and DAB = D = const can be assumed, (2.365) simpliﬁes to ∂ξA (2.378) = D∇2 ξA + Γ˙ A / ∂t with Γ˙ A = Γ˙ A (ϑ, ξA ). The equation (2.375) for vanishing average molar velocity u = 0, can also be simpliﬁed, when it is applied to binary mixtures of ideal gases. As a good approximation, at low pressures generally up to about 10 bar, the diﬀusion coeﬃcient is independent of the composition. It increases with temperature and is inversely proportional to pressure. The diﬀusion coeﬃcients in isobaric, isothermal mixtures are constant. In this case (2.375) is transformed into the equation for c = const ∂cA (2.379) = D∇2 cA + γ˙ A ∂t with γ˙ A = γ˙ A (ϑ, x˜A ). The equations (2.378) and (2.379) are equivalent to each other, because putting ˜ A into (2.379) results in cA = A /M ∂A ˜A . = D∇2 A + γ˙ A M ∂t On the other hand, because = const we can also write ∂A = D∇2 A + Γ˙ A . ∂t ˜ A = Γ˙ A , which shows that the two equations are equivalent. For By deﬁnition γ˙ A M the case where no chemical reaction occurs, γ˙ A = 0. (2.379) was ﬁrst presented

2.6 Mass diﬀusion

251

by A. Fick in 1855 [2.76], and ∂cA = D∇2cA ∂t is therefore known as Fick’s second law.

2.6.4

(2.380)

Boundary conditions

The equations (2.379) and (2.378) are of the same type as the heat conduction equation (2.11). The following correspondences hold 6 , cA =ϑ

˙ /c . D=a 6 and γ˙ A = 6W

As a result of this many solutions to the heat conduction equation can be transferred to the analogous mass diﬀusion problems, provided that not only the differential equations but also the initial and boundary conditions agree. Numerous solutions of the diﬀerential equation (2.379) can be found in Crank’s book [2.78]. Analogous to heat conduction, the initial condition prescribes a concentration at every position in the body at a certain time. Timekeeping begins with this time, such that cA (x, y, z, t = 0) = cAα (x, y, z) . (2.381) The local boundary conditions can be split into three groups, just as in heat conduction processes. 1. The concentration can be set as a function of time and the position x0, y0 , z0 on the surface of the body (boundary condition of the 1st kind) cA (x0 , y0 , z0 , t) = cA0 (t) .

(2.382)

Examples of this are the drying of porous substances in the ﬁrst drying period, when the surface is covered by a liquid ﬁlm, or the evaporation of water in dry air. In both cases the saturation pressure pAS (ϑ), associated with the temperature ϑ, becomes apparent at the interface between the liquid and gas. This then gives cA0 = pAS (ϑ)/Rm T . The solubility of a gas A in an adjacent liquid or solid B is also often of interest. If the gas is only weakly soluble in the liquid, the mole fraction x˜A of the dissolved gas is obtained from Henry’s law (1.217) as x˜A0 = pAS (ϑ)/kH , where kH is the Henry coeﬃcient. It is a function of temperature and pressure in binary mixtures. The pressure dependence can, however, be neglected if the total pressure of the gas is so low that it can be considered to be ideal. Numerical values of kH (ϑ) for this case can be found in the tables from Landolt-B¨ornstein [2.79].

252

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

2. The diﬀusional ﬂux normal to the surface can be prescribed as a function of time and position (boundary condition of the 2nd kind) u jA

= −c D

∂ x˜A , ∂n

(2.383)

whereby for surfaces impermeable to the material we get ∂ x˜A /∂n = 0 .

(2.384)

3. Contact between two quiescent bodies (1) and (2) at the interface can exist (boundary condition of the 3rd kind) (1)

(c D)0

∂ x˜ (1) A

∂n

(2)

= (c D)0

0

∂ x˜ (2) A

∂n

.

(2.385)

0

If a quiescent body (1) is bounded by a moving ﬂuid (2) a diﬀusion boundary layer develops in the ﬂuid. Instead of (2.385), the boundary condition (1)

− (c D)0

∂ x˜ (1) A

∂n

0

(2)

= β Δ cA

(2)

(2.386) (2)

(2)

is used, with concentration diﬀerence in the ﬂuid ΔcA = cA0 −cAδ between the interface 0 and the edge δ of the boundary layer of the ﬂuid. The mole fraction x˜A and concentration cA are transferable into each other by cA = x˜A c. The concentration c = N/V is given by c = p/Rm T for ideal gases, whilst for real gases it has to be taken from the thermal equation of state. If heat is transferred by conduction between two bodies (1) and (2) which are in contact with each other (boundary condition of the 3rd kind), then not only (1) (2) the heat ﬂuxes, but also the temperatures ϑ0 = ϑ0 will be equal. In contrast to this, in diﬀusion at the phase interface, a concentration jump almost always develops. This is yielded from the equilibrium conditions with regard to mass transfer (equality of the chemical potential of each component in each phase). A relationship of the form below exists for given values of temperature and pressure (1)

(2)

xA0 ) , x˜A0 = f (˜

(2.387)

which is provided by the thermodynamics of phase equilibria. An equation of this type is the deﬁnition equation for the equilibrium constant (1)

(2)

xA0 . K := x˜A0 /˜ For the solubility of gases in liquids K = kH (ϑ)/p ,

(2.388)

2.6 Mass diﬀusion

253

where kH (ϑ) is the Henry coeﬃcient. As already mentioned in chapter 1 further information about the equilibrium constant and Henry coeﬃcients can be found in text books on the thermodynamics of mixtures, for example [1.1]. The solubility of a gas A in a solid phase is calculated from cA0 = LS pA0

(2.389)

with the solubility LS (SI units mol/m3 bar). Numerical values can be found in the tables from Landolt-B¨ornstein [2.79] among others. Example 2.13: In a spherical vessel of internal diameter 1450 mm and wall thickness 4 mm made of chromium-nickel-steel, a gas containing hydrogen is stored at 85 ◦ C under high pressure. The hydrogen has an initial partial pressure of 1 MPa. As a result of diﬀusion through the vessel wall, some of the hydrogen is lost into the air surrounding the container, such that the pressure in the vessel falls over time. We wish to calculate the time taken for the pressure in the vessel to fall by 10−3 MPa, and how much hydrogen is lost in this time interval. Hint: As the pressure in the vessel falls very slowly the change over time of the hydrogen content in the wall can be neglected, i.e. we assume steady-state diﬀusion. Equation (2.389) holds for the amount of hydrogen dissolved at the wall surface, with the experimentally determined solubility coeﬃcient LS = 9.01 mol/m3 bar. The diﬀusion coeﬃcient for hydrogen into the vessel wall at 85 ◦ C is D = 1.05 · 10−13 m2 /s. The gaseous mixture in the vessel satisﬁes the thermal equation of state for ideal gases. The hydrogen content in the surrounding air may be neglected. The amount of hydrogen (substance A is hydrogen) which diﬀuses through the vessel wall is equal to the reduction in the amount stored: jA A = −

dNA dN =− . dt dt

Furthermore

D Am (cAi − cAa ) δ √ with wall thickness δ and the geometric mean Am = Ai Ao ∼ = Ai of the internal and external surface areas. With cAo = 0 and cAi = LS pA we obtain jA A =

jA A =

D Am LS pA . δ

On the other hand, for the amount of hydrogen inside the vessel we have NA = pA V /Rm T . This then gives V dpA D − = Am LS pA Rm T dt δ or Rm T D d ln pA = − Am LS dt . δ V Integration yields D Rm T t pA (t) = pA (t = 0) exp − Am LS δ V Putting in the numerical values we obtain pA (t1 ) = 1 MPa · exp (−2.915 · 10−11 t1 /s) from which we get t1 =

1 (1 − 10−3 ) MPa ln s = 3.432 · 107 s = 9534 h = 397 days . −11 −2.915 · 10 1 MPa

254

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

The loss of hydrogen follows from the equation of state for ideal gases MA ΔpA 10−3 MPa = = . MA (t = 0) pA (t = 0) 1 MPa This is 0.1 % of the initial amount of hydrogen present, which was ˜ A NA (t = 0) = M ˜ A pA (t = 0) V /Rm T = 1.072 kg . MA (t = 0) = M

2.6.5

Steady-state mass diﬀusion with catalytic surface reaction

We have already considered steady-state one-dimensional diﬀusion in the introductory sections 1.4.1 and 1.4.2. Chemical reactions were excluded from these discussions. We now want to consider the eﬀect of chemical reactions, ﬁrstly the reactions that occur in a catalytic reactor. These are heterogeneous reactions, which we understand to be reactions at the contact area between a reacting medium and the catalyst. It takes place at the surface, and can therefore be formulated as a boundary condition for a mass transfer problem. In contrast homogeneous reactions take place inside the medium. Inside each volume element, depending on the temperature, composition and pressure, new chemical compounds are generated from those already present. Each volume element can therefore be seen to be a source for the production of material, corresponding to a heat source in heat conduction processes.

Fig. 2.64: Catalytic reactor

Fig. 2.65: Uni-directional diﬀusion with reaction at the catalyst surface

As an example we will consider a catalytic reactor, Fig. 2.64, in which by a chemical reaction between a gas A and its reaction partner R, a new reaction product P is formed. The reaction partner R and the gas A are fed into the reactor, excess gas A and reaction product P are removed from the reactor. The

2.6 Mass diﬀusion

255

reaction is ﬁlled with spheres, whose surfaces are covered with a catalytic material. The reaction between gas A and reactant R occurs at the catalyst surface and is accelerated due to the presence of the catalyst. In most cases the complex reaction mechanisms at the catalyst surface are not known completely, which suggests the use of very simpliﬁed models. For this we will consider a section of the catalyst surface, Fig. 2.65. On the catalyst surface x = 0 at steady-state, the same amount of gas as is generated will be transported away by diﬀusion. The reaction rate is equal to the diﬀusive ﬂux. In general the reaction rate n˙ A0 of a catalytic reaction depends on the concentration of the reaction partner. In the present case we assume that the reaction rate will be predominantly determined by the concentration cA (x = 0) = cA0 of gas A at the surface. For a ﬁrst order reaction it is given by n˙ A0 = −k1 cA0 . (2.390) For an n-th order reaction we have n˙ A0 = −kn cnA0 .

(2.391)

Here kn is the rate constant with SI units (mol / m2 s) / (mol / m3 )n . The rate constant k1 for a ﬁrst order reaction has SI units m/s. The superscript indices indicate that the reaction takes place at the surface. The minus sign makes n˙ A0 negative, as substance A is consumed in the chemical reaction. If substance A had been generated (2.390) would have a positive sign. Presuming that the reaction is ﬁrst order, at the catalyst surface it holds that ∂ x˜A = −k1 cA0 . (2.392) n˙ A0 = − c D ∂x x=0 Above the catalyst surface, substance A will be transported by diﬀusion, mainly in the x-direction. In a thin layer close to the wall, the diﬀusion boundary layer, mass transport by convection is negligible, and from (2.375) we obtain the diﬀusion equation valid for steady one-dimensional diﬀusion without chemical reaction d d˜ xA cD =0 . (2.393) dx dx Its solution must not only satisfy the boundary condition (2.392) but also x˜A (x = L) = x˜AL

(2.394)

where L is the thickness of the diﬀusion boundary layer. Under the assumption of c D = const we obtain the solution x˜A − x˜AL =

k1 cA0 (x − L) . cD

The mole fraction at the wall x = 0 is found to be x˜A0 = −

k1 cA0 k x˜A0 L L + x˜AL = − 1 + x˜AL cD D

(2.395)

256

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

or

x˜AL . (2.396) 1 + k1 L/D Furthermore, if we take c = const as an assumption, due to cA = x˜A c, we get cAL (2.397) cA0 = 1 + k1 L/D and therefore the reaction rate with (2.392) k1 cAL n˙ A0 = − . (2.398) 1 + (k1 L/D) In the case of convective mass transfer at the catalyst surface, the mass transfer coeﬃcient β appears in this equation in place of D/L, β = D/L. This can be easily checked because (2.392) can be replaced by x˜A0 =

n˙ A0 = −k1 cA0 = β (cA0 − cAL) , which after elimination of cA0 , yields the relationship k1 cAL . (2.399) n˙ A0 = − 1 + (k1 /β) The negative sign in (2.398) and (2.399) indicates that the mass ﬂow of A is towards the catalyst surface. The dimensionless quantity Da1 = k1 L/D

(2.400)

5

is called the Damk¨ohler number for a heterogeneous ﬁrst order reaction (there are further Damk¨ohler numbers). It is the ratio of the reaction rate k1 to the diﬀusion rate D/L. In (2.398) or (2.399) two limiting case are of interest: a) Da 1 = k1 L/D or k1 /β are very small, because k1 D/L or k1 β. Then n˙ A0 = −k1 cAL .

(2.401)

The material conversion will be determined by the reaction rate. It is “reaction controlled”. According to (2.397) the concentration of substance A perpendicular to the catalyst surface is constant, i.e. cA0 = cAL . b) Da1 = k1 L/D or k1 /β is very large because k1 D/L or k1 β. Then we get D (2.402) n˙ A0 = − cAL or n˙ A0 = −β cAL . L The material conversion is determined by diﬀusion. It is “diﬀusion controlled”. So according to (2.397), cA0 = 0. Substance A will be completely converted in a rapid reaction at the catalyst surface. 5 Gerhard Damk¨ohler (1908–1944) was the ﬁrst to develop a similarity theory for chemical processes with consideration of both heat and mass transfer. With his work “Einﬂuß von Diﬀusion, Str¨omung und W¨ armetransport auf die Ausbeute von chemischen Reaktionen” (Der Chemie-Ingenieur, Leipzig, 1937, 359–485), in English, “The inﬂuence of diﬀusion, ﬂow and heat transport on the yield of a chemical reaction”, he paved the way for further investigation into chemical reaction technology.

2.6 Mass diﬀusion

257

Example 2.14: In the catalytic converter of a car, nitrogen oxide is reduced at the catalyst surface, according to the following reaction NO + CO →

1 N2 + CO2 . 2

The NO-reduction (substance A) is approximately a ﬁrst order reaction n˙ A0 = −k1 cA0 . The exhaust ﬂow of a 75 kW engine is M˙ = 350 kg/h, the molar mass of the exhaust gases ˜ = 32 kg/kmol and can be approximated as constant. The exhaust gases are at 480 ◦ C is M and 0.12 MPa and contain NO with a mole fraction of x ˜AL = 10−3 . 80 % of this has to be removed. The mass transfer coeﬃcient β = 0.1 m/s and the rate constant k1 = 0.05 m/s are given. How large a catalyst surface is required? The molar ﬂow rate of the exhaust is ˜ = N˙ = M˙ /M

350 kg/h = 3.038 · 10−3 kmol/s . 3600 s/h · 32 kg/kmol

The material balance around the dotted balance region, Fig. 2.66, yields

Fig. 2.66: For the material balance of an exhaust catalytic converter

(N˙ x ˜AL )z = (N˙ x ˜AL )z+dz + n˙ AL dA or, because N˙ = const N˙ d˜ xAL = −n˙ AL dA . xAL − x ˜A0 ), if we presume a low mass ﬂow rate normal to the wall and Here n˙ AL = β c (˜ we neglect the Stefan correction factor for the mass transfer coeﬃcients. With c = N/V = p/Rm T we get −βp x ˜A0 N˙ d˜ xAL = x ˜AL 1 − dA . Rm T x ˜AL Putting in (2.396) yields, whilst accounting for β = D/L k1 −p N˙ d˜ xAL = x ˜AL dA Rm T 1 + k1 /β or

−p k1 dA . ˙ x ˜AL N Rm T 1 + k1 /β Integration between the inlet cross section i and the exit cross section e of the catalytic converter of area A yields 1

ln

d˜ xAL =

(˜ xAL )e k1 p =− A , (˜ xAL )i N˙ Rm T 1 + k1 /β

and therefore A=

xAL )i N˙ Rm T (1 + k1 /β) (˜ ln . p k1 (˜ xAL )e

258

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

This then becomes A=

7 3.038 mol/s · 8.31451 Nm/molK · 753.15 K(1 + 0.05 m/s 0.1 m/s) 0.12 · 106 N/m2 · 0.05 m/s

ln(10−3 /2 · 10−4 )

A = 7.65 m2 .

2.6.6

Steady-state mass diﬀusion with homogeneous chemical reaction

We will consider the case of a substance A which diﬀuses into a porous or paste type solid or a quiescent ﬂuid B, as shown in Fig. 2.67, where it reacts chemically with other reaction partners. A good example of this is the biological treatment of waste water. Here oxygen diﬀuses out of air or oxygen bubbles into the waste water that surrounds them, where it is converted along with the organic pollutants, e.g. hydrocarbons, into carbon dioxide and water by microorganisms. Substance B can also be a catalyst. Catalysts frequently consist of spherical or cylindrical pellets with have ﬁne capillaries running through them. The porous internal surface area is determined by the ﬁne capillaries and is many times greater than the outer surface area. Chemical conversion can therefore be accelerated both at the outer and inner surfaces.

Fig. 2.67: Unidirectional mass diﬀusion with homogeneous reaction

According to (2.375), for steady-state, geometric one-dimensional diﬀusion with chemical reaction we have d d˜ xA cD + γ˙ A = 0 . (2.403) dx dx We will now assume that substance A and the products created by the chemical reaction are only present in very small amounts in substance B. So, this is approximately c = N/V = const. In addition we will set D = const. If substance B is a porous solid the molecular diﬀusion coeﬃcient D has to be replaced by the eﬀective diﬀusion coeﬃcient Deﬀ . This is smaller than the molecular diﬀusion coeﬃcient because the movement of the molecules is impeded by the pores. It is common practice to deﬁne a diﬀusion resistance factor μ :=

D . Deﬀ

2.6 Mass diﬀusion

259

A porous solid of volume V consists of the volume VS of the solid material and VG = V − VS the volume of the solid-free spaces. We call εp := VG /V the void fraction. The resistance factor depends on the voidage of the porous body and on a diversion or winding factor μp such that the relationships μ = μp /εp , and Deﬀ =

1 εp D . D= μ μp

hold. The following table contains several values for the void fraction and the diversion factor. Table 2.18: Void fraction εp and diversion factor μp of some dry materials Material Wall bricks Clinker bricks Lime sandstone Pumice concrete Wood ﬁbre Molecular sieve 4 ˚ A Molecular sieve 10 ˚ A Silica gel Activated carbon

Density kg/m3

Void fraction εp

Diversion factor μp

1360 2050 900 840 300 1100 1180 1090 760

0.49 0.19 0.63 0.62 0.81 0.45 0.57 0.46 0.56

3.3 to 3.4 73.0 to 89.0 5.4 to 5.9 4.3 to 5.5 2.0 to 2.6 10.3 8.0 3.6 7.0

Substance A is converted in a ﬁrst order reaction γ˙ A = −k1 cA ,

(2.404)

where k1 is the rate constant of the chemical reaction (SI unit s−1 ). The subscript index 1 indicates that it concerns a ﬁrst order reaction. The reaction rate γ˙ A is negative, because substance A is consumed in the reaction. If A was generated, a positive sign would be present in (2.404). In porous solids the reaction is quicker the larger the inner and outer surface areas. The rate constant k1 is therefore split into two factors k1 = aP k1 , (2.405) in which aP is the speciﬁc area (SI units m2 /m3 ). It is the area available for reaction divided by the volume of the porous solid. The rate constant k1 has SI units of m/s. With x˜A = cA /c, (2.403) and (2.404) are transformed, under the assumptions already given into d2 cA k1 − cA = 0 . (2.406) dx2 D

260

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

This has to be solved under the boundary conditions shown in Fig. 2.67 cA (x = 0) = cA0 and

(2.407)

d c A

=0 . (2.408) dx x=L D is replaced by Deﬀ for porous solids. Equation (2.406) agrees in terms of its form with (2.53) for heat conduction in a rod. In this case the temperature proﬁle was calculated with the boundary conditions of constant temperature at the beginning of the rod and vanishing heat ﬂow at the end of the rod. In the current problem these correspond to the boundary conditions (2.407) and (2.408). The solution of (2.406) to (2.408) therefore corresponds to the relationship 2.57 found earlier for heat conduction in rods. The solution is cA cosh[m(L − x)] = cA0 cosh(m L) with m=

k1 /D .

The amount of substance transferred is dc A = A D cA0 m tanh(mL) . N˙ A0 = A n˙ A0 = −A D dx x=0

(2.409)

(2.410)

(2.411)

The dimensionless quantity mL =

k1 L2 /D := Ha

(2.412)

is known as the Hatta6 number Ha. The square of Ha is equal to the ratio of the so-called relaxation time of the reaction tR = 1/k1 and the relaxation time of diﬀusion tD := L2 /D , which is then Ha2 = tD /tR . A large value for the Hatta number means that the chemical reaction is rapid in comparison with diﬀusion. Substance A cannot penetrate very far into substance B by diﬀusion, but will be converted by chemical reaction in a layer close to the surface. 6

Shironji Hatta (1895–1973) was a professor at the Tohoku Imperial University, now the Tohoku University, in Tokyo, Japan. He undertook a number of fundamental studies about the absorption of gases in liquids, in particular absorption with simultaneous chemical reaction.

2.6 Mass diﬀusion

261

We introduce another factor for porous bodies, it is called the pore eﬀectiveness factor ηP . This is understood to be the ratio of the actual amount of substance transferred N˙ A0 to the amount which would be transferred N˙ A , if the concentration cA0 prevailed throughout the porous body. This basically means, if the eﬀective diﬀusion coeﬃcient Deﬀ , which is used in place of the molecular diﬀusion coeﬃcient D, was very large Deﬀ → ∞, then Ha → 0. Then according to (2.404) the reaction rate of substance A γ˙ A = −k1 cA0 disappears and the total amount delivered would be N˙ A = k1 cA0 A L .

(2.413)

The pore eﬀectiveness factor would then be ηP =

N˙ A0 Deﬀ = m tanh (mL) k1 L N˙ A

or ηP =

tanh (mL) mL

(2.414)

with m = k1 /Deﬀ = k1 ap /Deﬀ . The pore eﬀectiveness factor is valid for pores with constant cross sectional area. It corresponds to the ﬁn eﬃciency for a straight, rectangular ﬁn, eq. (2.79). The pore eﬀectiveness factor for pores of any cross sectional shape, can also be calculated, as a fairly good approximation using (2.414), as shown by Aris [2.81], if the length L is formed as a characteristic length L = V /A

(2.415)

with the volume V of the porous body and its outer surface area A. A spherical pellet of radius R would, for example, have L = (4/3)πR3 / 4πR2 = R/3. For small values mL < 0.3 in (2.414) we obtain ηp > 0.97, which lies close to 1. This implies that the composition of the reaction partner A hardly changes over the length of the pore. The resistance to diﬀusion is negligible in comparison to the other resistances. A small value of mL = k1 /Deﬀ L indicates a small pore, a slow reaction or rapid diﬀusion. Example 2.15: In order to reduce the CO content in the waste gas from a furnace, the exhaust gas is passed over the porous CuO particles (pellets) of a catalytic reactor in the exhaust pipe. The CO (substance A) is oxidised with O2 to CO2 inside and at the surface of the pellets, according to the reaction 1 CO + O2 = CO2 . 2 This can be approximately taken to be a ﬁrst order reaction, so n˙ A = −k1 aP cA .

262

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

a) Find the pore eﬀectiveness factor. b) How many kg CuO are required if the mole fraction of CO has to be reduced to 1/10 of its initial value x˜A = 0.04? The molar ﬂow rate N˙ of the exhaust gas can be assumed to be constant. Given: Molar ﬂow rate of the exhaust gas N˙ = 3 mol/s, mole fraction of CO in the exhaust gas x ˜A = 0.04, exhaust temperature 480 ◦ C, pressure 0.12 MPa, diameter of the spherical pellets 5 mm, speciﬁc area aP = 5 · 106 m2 /m3 , eﬀective diﬀusion coeﬃcient Deﬀ = 5·10−5 m2 /s, reaction rate constant k1 = 10−3 m/s, density of CuO: CuO = 8.9·103 kg/m3 . a) We have mL = (k1 aP /Deﬀ )1/2 L with L = R/3. Which gives mL = (10−3 m/s · 5 · 106 m2 /m3 /5 · 10−5 m2 /s)1/2 (2.5 · 10−3 m/3) = 8.33 and therefore ηp = tanh(mL)/(mL) = 0.12 . b) The CO ﬂowing outside the pores in the gas space is decomposed by a chemical reaction. Along an element dz the amount of CO changes by d(N˙ x ˜A0 ). This amount is converted by chemical reaction in the pores xA0 ηp dVP . dN˙ A0 = γ˙ A dVP = −k1 aP cA0 ηp dVP = −k1 aP c˜ VP is the volume of the pellets. With that we get ˜A0 ηp dVP . d(N˙ x ˜A0 ) = −k1 ap c x From which, with N˙ = const and c = p/RmT it follows that d˜ xA0 k aP pηp dVP . =− 1 x ˜A0 N˙ Rm T ˜Ao at the outlet of the reactor After integration between mole fraction x˜Ai at the inlet and x we obtain the volume VP of the pellets VP = VP =

N˙ Rm T x ˜Ai ln , k1 aP p ηp x ˜Ao

3 mol/s · 8.31451 Nm/mol K · 753.15 K ln 10 = 6.008 · 10−4 m3 . 10−3 m/s · 5 · 106 m2 /m3 · 1.2 · 105 N/m2 · 0.12

Therefore we need M = VP = 8.9 · 103 kg/m3 · 6.008 · 10−4 m3 = 5.35 kg CuO .

2.6.7

Transient mass diﬀusion

In section 2.6.3 it was shown that the diﬀerential equation for transient mass diﬀusion is of the same type as the heat conduction equation, a result of which is that many mass diﬀusion problems can be traced back to the corresponding heat conduction problem. We wish to discuss this in detail for transient diﬀusion in a semi-inﬁnite solid and in the simple bodies like plates, cylinders and spheres.

2.6 Mass diﬀusion

2.6.7.1

263

Transient mass diﬀusion in a semi-inﬁnite solid

We will consider transient diﬀusion of a substance in a semi-inﬁnite body B. At time t = 0, substance A is stored in the body at a concentration cAα . The desired concentration proﬁle cA = cA (x, t) satisﬁes the following diﬀerential equation, under the assumption cD = const ∂cA ∂ 2 cA , =D ∂t ∂x2 and should fulﬁll the initial condition

t ≥ 0,

x≥0

(2.416)

cA (t = 0, x) = cAα = const . In analogy to the heat conduction problem, the following conditions are possible at the surface of the body: – a stepwise change in the surface concentration to the value cA0 , which should remain constant for t > 0, – input of a constant molar ﬂux n˙ A0 , – a stepwise change in the concentration in the surroundings to cAU = cA0 , so that mass transfer takes place with a mass transfer coeﬃcient β. As we already know, the solutions for the heat conduction problems in section 2.3.3 can be transferred to the mass diﬀusion problem, due to the similarity of the diﬀerential equations, initial and boundary conditions. The corresponding quantities to heat conduction for mass diﬀusion are shown in the following table. Table 2.19: Corresponding relationships between quantities in heat conduction and diﬀusion Heat conduction

Diﬀusion

ϑ

cA

a +

t = at/L

D 2

Bi = αL/λ √ x/2 at √ b = λc

t+ D

= Dt/L2

BiD = βL/D √ x/2 Dt √ bD = D

Using these correspondences allows us to write up the solutions to the diﬀusion problem from the solutions already discussed for heat conduction. In transient diﬀusion in a semi-inﬁnite solid with stepwise change in the surface concentration, we ﬁnd from (2.126) cA − cAα x = erfc √ cA0 − cAα 2 Dt

(2.417)

264

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

and with (2.131) the transferred molar ﬂux √ x2 D . n˙ A (t, x) = √ (cA0 − cAα ) exp − 4Dt πt The molar ﬂux transferred at the surface x = 0 is √ D n˙ A (t, x = 0) = √ (cA0 − cAα ) . πt

(2.418)

(2.419)

Corresponding solutions are found from (2.135), when a constant molar ﬂux n˙ A0 is fed in at the surface. In the same way the solution for mass transfer from the surface to another ﬂuid is obtained from (2.140). 2.6.7.2

Transient mass diﬀusion in bodies of simple geometry with one-dimensional mass ﬂow

The time dependent concentration ﬁeld cA (x, t) in a body is determined by the diﬀusion equation which corresponds to the heat conduction equation (2.157). With cD = const this equation is as follows ∂ 2c n ∂cA ∂cA A + (2.420) =D 2 ∂t ∂r r ∂r with n = 0 for a plate, n = 1 for a cylinder and n = 2 for a sphere, when geometric one-dimensional ﬂow in the r-direction is assumed. As in heat conduction, r is the radial coordinate for cylinders and spheres. The cylinder should be very long in comparison to its diameter. The concentrations cA in the cylinder and sphere cannot be dependent on the angular coordinate. With a plate the x-coordinate will, for now, be indicated by r. It goes from the centre of the plate outwards. With the initial condition t=0:

cA (r) = cAα ,

0≤r≤R

and the boundary conditions r = 0 : ∂cA/∂r = 0 r = R : −D∂cA/∂r = β(cA − cAS ) we obtain the results by applying the basics of the solution to the corresponding heat conduction problem. We put in cA − cAS c+ . A = cAα − cAS For the ﬂat plate, from (2.171) and (2.172), as well as with BiD and t+ D according to Tab. 2.14 and r+ = r/R, it follows that: + + c+ A (r , tD ) =

∞ %

Bi2D i=1

2 BiD 1 cos(μi r+ ) exp(−μ2i t+ D) 2 + BiD + μi cos μi

(2.421)

2.6 Mass diﬀusion

265

with the eigenvalues μi from tan μ = BiD /μ .

(2.422)

The average concentration c+ Am follows from (2.174) + 2 c+ Am (tD ) = 2BiD

∞ %

exp(−μ2iD t+ D) . + BiD + μ2i )

μ2i (Bi2D i=1

(2.423)

Analogous results are yielded with the equations from section 2.3.4.4, for the cylinder and the sphere. + Example 2.16: What is the equation for the average concentration c+ Am (tD ) of a sphere, if the concentration jumps from its initial value cA (r, t = 0) = cAα to a value of cA (r = R, t) = cA0 ? The jump in the surface concentration at r = R is only possible if the resistance to mass transfer 1/βA between the surface area A and the surroundings is small enough to be neglected. This means 7 that β → ∞, giving BiD = βR/DAB → ∞ and cA0 = cAS , and also c+ Am = (cAm − cA0 ) (cAα − cA0 ). For a sphere we obtain, from (2.183) and (2.185) + + c+ A (r , tD ) =

∞ %

2 BiD

i=1

with the eigenvalues μi from

μ2i + (BiD − 1)2 sin μi sin(μi r+ ) exp(−μ2i t+ D) μ2i + BiD (BiD − 1) μi μi r + μ cot μ = 1 − BiD .

(2.424)

(2.425)

The average concentration is, in accordance with (2.184), + 2 c+ Am (tD ) = 6 BiD

∞ %

μ2 [μ2i i=1 i

exp(−μ2i t+ D) . + BiD (BiD − 1)]

(2.426)

For BiD → ∞ we obtain, from (2.425), the eigenvalues μ1 = π, μ2 = 2π, μ3 = 3π . . . and as the average concentration from (2.426) + c+ Am (tD ) = 6

∞ % exp(−μ2 t+ ) i D

i=1

μ2i

.

With the eigenvalues μi = iπ, i = 1, 2, 3 . . . we can also write + c+ Am (tD ) =

∞ 6 % exp(−i2 π 2 t+ D) . π 2 i=1 i2

(2.427)

266

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

2.7

Exercises

2.1: Derive the diﬀerential equation for the temperature ﬁeld ϑ = ϑ(r, t), that appears in a cylinder in transient, geometric one-dimensional heat conduction in the radial direction. Start with the energy balance for a hollow cylinder of internal radius r and thickness Δr and execute this to the limit Δr → 0. The material properties λ and c depend on ϑ; internal heat sources are not present. 2.2: One surface (x = 0) of a cooled plate, which has thickness δ, is insulated, whilst at the other surface heat is transferred to a ﬂuid at a temperature of ϑF . Sketch the temperature proﬁle ϑ = ϑ(x, t∗ ) in the plate for a ﬁxed time t∗ . Which conditions must the curve satisfy close to the two surfaces x = 0 and x = δ, if the Biot number is Bi = αδ/λ = 1.5? In addition sketch the temperature proﬁle of the ﬂuid temperature in the boundary layer on the surface of the plate, taking account of the condition N u = αδ/λF = 10; λF is the thermal conductivity of the ﬂuid. 2.3: The temperature proﬁle in a steel plate of thickness δ = 60 mm and constant thermal diﬀusivity a = 12.6 · 10−6 m2 /s, at a ﬁxed time t0 is given by ϑ − ϑ1 1 , 0 ≤ x+ ≤ 1 , ϑ+ := = x+ − B(t0 ) cos π(x+ − ) ϑ2 − ϑ1 2 with B(t0 ) = 0.850. Here x+ = x/δ; ϑ1 = 100 ◦ C and ϑ2 = 250 ◦ C are the constant surface temperatures of the plate at x+ = 0 and x+ = 1. a) Draw the temperature distribution ϑ = ϑ(x, t0 ). Is the plate heated or cooled? b) At which position x+ T does the temperature change the fastest with time? How big is ∂ϑ/∂t there? + c) Does x+ T agree with the position xmin at which the temperature proﬁle at time t0 has its minimum?

d) Determine the time function B(t) whilst accounting for the initial condition B(t0 ) = 0.850. Which steady temperature pattern is yielded for t → ∞? 2.4: Heat is released due to a reaction in a very long cylinder of radius R. The thermal power density increases with distance r from the cylinder axis: ˙ (r) = W ˙ R (r/R)m W

,

m≥0 .

˙ R have a) How big is the heat ﬂux q(R) ˙ released from the cylinder? How large does W to be so that q(R) ˙ agrees with the heat ﬂux released from a cylinder of the same ˙ 0? dimensions with a spatially constant thermal power density W b) For a cylinder with constant λ calculate the overtemperature Θ(r) = ϑ(r) − ϑ(R) using the formulation Θ(r) = A 1 − (r/R)k , which satisﬁes the boundary conditions r = 0 : dΘ/ dr = 0 and

r=R: Θ=0 .

2.7 Exercises

267

c) Compare the maximum overtemperature Θmax with the maximum overtemperature ˙ 0 . How big is the ratio Θ0max of a cylinder with constant thermal power density W Θmax /Θ0max , if both cylinders release the same amount of heat? Calculate Θmax /Θ0max for m = 0, 1, 2 and 3. 2.5: A steel bolt (d = 20 mm, λ = 52.0 W/K m) protrudes from an insulation layer, cf. Fig. 2.68. Its left hand end is kept at the constant temperature ϑ∗ = 75.0 ◦ C. The bolt is completely insulated over the length Lis = 100 mm. The piece sticking out, L = 200 mm, releases heat to the surroundings, which are at ϑS = 15.0 ◦ C, where the heat transfer coeﬃcient is α = 8.85 W/m2 K at the outside of the bolt and the free head surface.

Fig. 2.68: Steel bolt sticking out of an insulation layer

a) Find the temperatures ϑ0 and ϑL . b) How large is the heat ﬂow released by the bolt to its surroundings? Determine the heat ﬂow Q˙ L out of the free head end. c) Compare the results obtained from the temperature proﬁle according to (2.55), with the values yielded for a replacement bolt of length LC with an adiabatic head end, according to (2.60). 2.6: The eﬃciency ηf of a straight ﬁn with a rectangular cross section is determined by measuring three temperatures: the temperature ϑ0 at the ﬁn base, the temperature ϑh at the top of the ﬁn and the temperature ϑS of the ﬂuid which surrounds the ﬁn. Calculate ηf for ϑ0 = 75.0 ◦ C, ϑh = 40.5 ◦ C and ϑS = 15.0 ◦ C. 2.7: A brass tube with outer diameter d = 25 mm is exposed to an air stream ﬂowing across it perpendicular to its axis, the heat transfer coeﬃcient is α = 90 W/m2 K. The tube has annular ﬁns made of brass (λf = 126 W/K m) attached to it, which have a thickness of δf = 1.5 mm and are h = 20 mm high. The surface temperature of the tube and the air temperature can be taken to be constant. a) How many ﬁns per metre must be ﬁxed to the tube for the heat ﬂow released to the air to be six times larger? αf = α can be used. b) The height of the ﬁns is increased to h = 30 mm. By what factor does the heat ﬂow increase in comparison to the ﬁnned tube in a)? 2.8: A tube of diameter d = 0.30 m and surface temperature ϑR = 60 ◦ C is placed in the ground (λ = 1.20 W/K m) such that its axis lies 0.80 m below the surface. The air temperature is ϑA = 10 ◦ C; the heat transfer coeﬃcient between the air and the earth’s ˙ surface is α = 8.5 W/m2 K. How large is the heat loss Q/L per length L of the tube?

268

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

3

2.9: An asphalt road coating (λ = 0.65 W/K m, = 2120 kg/m , c = 920 J/kg K) has reached the temperature ϑ0 = 55 ◦ C, not only at its surface but in a layer several centimetres below the surface, due to a long period of sunshine. A sudden rainstorm reduces the surface temperature over 10 min to ϑS = 22 ◦ C. Find a) the heat released per unit area by the asphalt during the rainstorm, and b) the temperature at a depth of 3.0 cm at the end of the rain shower. 2.10: A very thick concrete wall (λ = 0.80 W/K m, = 1950 kg/m3 , c = 880 J/kg K) initially has as temperature throughout the wall of ϑ0 = 20 ◦ C. It is heated at its surface with a constant heat ﬂux q˙0 = 650 W/m2 (sunshine). What temperature has the surface reached after 2.0 h? How high is the temperature at this time at a depth of 10 cm? 2.11: Solve exercise 2.10 with the additional condition that the concrete wall releases heat to air at a temperature ϑS = ϑ0 = 20 ◦ C, whereby the heat transfer coeﬃcient α = 15.0 W/m2 K is decisive. 2.12: The penetration of the daily and seasonal temperature ﬂuctuations in the ground (a = 0.35 · 10−6 m2 /s) is to be investigated. For this it is assumed that the surface temperature follows an harmonic oscillation ϑ0 (t) = 10.0 ◦ C + Δϑ cos(2π t/t0 ) with periodic time t0 . a) Show that the amplitude of the daily temperature ﬂuctuations (Δϑ = 10 ◦ C, t0 = 24 h) is already small enough to be neglected at a depth of 1 m. b) Find, for the seasonal temperature ﬂuctuation (Δϑ = 25 ◦ C, t0 = 365 d), the temperature proﬁle at a depth of 2 m. What are the highest and lowest temperatures at this depth, and on which day of the year do they appear, in each case using the assumption that the maximum surface temperature is achieved on 1st August. 2.13: A ﬂat wall of ﬁrestone has thickness δ = 0.325 m and material properties λ = 1.15 W/K m, a = 0.613 · 10−6 m2 /s. One of its surfaces is insulated, whilst heat is transferred to the surroundings (ϑS = 20.0 ◦ C) at the other. The wall has an initial temperature ϑ0 = 180.0 ◦ C. At time t1 the temperature of the non-insulated surface is ϑW1 = 50.0 ◦ C; at time t2 = t1 + 8.50 h the surface temperature has fallen to ϑW2 = 41.9 ◦ C. a) What value has the heat transfer coeﬃcient α decisive for the cooling? b) Find the temperatures of the insulated surface at times t1 and t2 . 3

2.14: A sphere made of plastic (λ = 0.35 W/K m, c = 2300 J/kg K, = 950 kg/m ) of diameter d = 20 mm, which was heated to ϑ0 = 110.0 ◦ C, is cooled in air at ϑS = 15.0 ◦ C; 2 the heat transfer coeﬃcient is α = 8.75 W/m K . a) What temperature has the sphere reached after 20 min? Use the approximation equation for small Biot numbers, cf. section 2.3.5.2. b) Compare the result from a) with the exact solution by calculating the mean temperature ϑm and the temperatures at the surface and the centre of the sphere.

2.7 Exercises

269

2.15: A very long steel tape with rectangular cross section (h = 15 mm, b = 50 mm) and thermal diﬀusivity a = 3.8 · 10−6 m2 /s is pulled through an oil bath of length L = 4.0 m. The oil bath is at the constant temperature ϑF = 50 ◦ C; the steel tape has a temperature of ϑ0 = 375 ◦ C as it enters the oil bath. The heat transfer coeﬃcient between the steel tape and the oil is so large that the surface of the steel tape assumes the temperature ϑF . With what speed w does the steel tape have to pulled through the oil for it to leave the oil bath with a temperature at its central axis of ϑk = 65 ◦ C? The axial heat conduction may be neglected. 2.16: A cast-iron pipe (λ = 51.0 W/K m) with internal diameter di = 40 mm and wall thickness δ = 7.5 mm is ﬁlled with water which is at a temperature of ϑE = 0.0 ◦ C. The external air is at ϑ0 = −8.0 ◦ C; the heat transfer coeﬃcient between the pipe and air is α = 25 W/m2 K. How long does it take for an ice layer of thickness s = 15 mm to form in the pipe, such that the increase in the volume of the ice compared to the water can lead to a burst pipe? How long will it take before the contents of the pipe are completely frozen? Properties of ice at 0 ◦ C: = 917 kg/m3 , λ = 2.25 W/K m, hE = 333 kJ/kg. 2.17: A very thin platinum wire of length L is mounted into the centre of a very large, normally cylindrical sample of the material whose thermal conductivity is to be measured. Good contact between the wire and the material surrounding it can be assumed. Until time t = 0 this arrangement is at a constant temperature ϑ0 . The wire is then heated electrically with a constant power Q˙ 0 . The temperatures ϑ1 and ϑ2 of the platinum wire are determined, (for example by the change in its resistance), at times t1 and t2 . According to [2.82], p. 442, the thermal conductivity of the material surrounding the wire is obtained from Q˙ 0 /L t2 λ= . ln 4π(ϑ2 − ϑ1 ) t1 Derive this relationship from eq. (2.235), section 2.3.7.2. 2.18: A very thick wall with constant thermal diﬀusivity a and a constant initial temperature ϑ0 is heated at its surface. The temperature rises there, between t = 0 and t = t∗ linearly with time t, to the value ϑ1 > ϑ0 , which remains constant for t > t∗ . The temperature proﬁle in the wall at times t = t∗ and t = 2 t∗ is to be calculated numerically. The simple explicit diﬀerence method is to be used, with Δt = t∗ /6 and M = 1/3, and the normalised temperature ϑ+ = (ϑ − ϑ0 )/(ϑ1 − ϑ0 ) is to be used. Compare the numerically calculated values with the exact solution ⎧ x t ⎪ ⎪ √ F for 0 ≤ t ≤ t∗ , ⎪ ⎨ t∗ 2 at + ϑ (x, t) = x t x t − t∗ ⎪ ⎪ √ for t ≥ t∗ , F − ∗ F ⎪ ⎩ t∗ t 2 at 2 a(t − t∗ ) where

2 F (ξ) = (1 + 2 ξ 2 ) erfc ξ − √ ξ exp(−ξ 2 ) . π

2.19: A long hollow plastic cylinder (λ = 0.23 W/K m, c = 1045 J/kg K, = 2200 kg/m3 ) with diameters di = 60 mm and da = 100 mm initially has a temperature of ϑ0 = 20 ◦ C, which is the same as that of the surroundings (air). At time t = 0 the hollow cylinder is ﬁlled with a hot liquid and is heated such that the inner wall assumes a temperature of ϑi = 80 ◦ C for t ≥ 0. At the outer wall, heat is transferred to the air with a heat transfer coeﬃcient of α = 12.0 W/m2 K.

270

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

a) Using the explicit diﬀerence method with Δr = 4.0 mm, show that the step size Δt = 60 s is permissible and go on to calculate the temperature proﬁle at time t∗ = 15 min. b) How large is the diﬀerence between the steady temperature proﬁle and the temperatures calculated for time t∗ ? 2.20: The eﬃciency of a square sheet ﬁn which sits on a tube of radius r0 is to be determined approximately using a diﬀerence method. The ﬁn has side length s = 4 r0 , a constant thickness δf and thermal conductivity λf . The heat transfer coeﬃcient αf is constant over the surface area of the ﬁn. The temperature at the ﬁn base is ϑ0 , the ambient temperature is ϑa . The diﬀerence method for the calculation of the dimensionless temperature ﬁeld ϑ+ = (ϑ − ϑa )/(ϑ0 − ϑa ) will be based on the square grid with Δx = 0.40 r0 , illustrated in Fig. 2.69. Due to symmetry it is suﬃcient to determine the 12 + temperatures ϑ+ 1 to ϑ12 .

Fig. 2.69: Square sheet ﬁn on a circular pipe, with square grid of mesh size Δx = 0.40 r0 . The dotted lines bound the areas associated with the temperatures ϑ+ i .

+ a) Set up the linear equations for the temperatures ϑ+ 1 to ϑ12 , using as an abbreviation the quantity m = 2αf /λf δf according to (2.71). Note that the grid points 5, 9 and 12 are only associated with the area Δx2 /2. In addition points 10 and 11 have another part of the area Δx2 associated with heat transfer that has to be calculated. + b) Find, for mΔx = 0.40, ϑ+ 1 to ϑ12 and determine an approximate value for ηf . Compare this value with the result yielded from the approximation equations (2.82) and (2.83).

2.7 Exercises

271

2.21: The wall depicted in Fig.2.70 is the corner of an industrial furnace made of silicate stones. The outside of the furnace is air-cooled. The inside temperature is kept constant at 500 ◦ C. The heat transfer coeﬃcient to the air is α = 10 W/m2 K, the ambient temperature ϑa = 20 ◦ C. The thermal conductivity of the silicate stones is λ = 0.8 W/mK, the thickness of the wall is δ = 0.25 m. Calculate with the aid of the ﬁnite element method the temperatures ϑ0 , . . . , ϑ4 and the external temperatures ϑ5 , . . . , ϑ10 . How much lower is the heat ﬂow to the outside, due to the thermal resistance in comparison to the heat ﬂow of example 2.8, where we assumed a constant wall temperature?

Fig. 2.70: Wall of a room with square base. Heat transfer to the surrounding air. FEM-grid

2.22: For cooling of electronic elements a baseplate with a grid consisting of 60 rods as shown in Fig. 2.71 is used. The rods are cooled in cross ﬂow by air of ϑa = 20 ◦ C with a heat transfer coeﬃcient of α = 20 W/m2 K. The rods are made of aluminium. Their thermal conductivitiy is λ = 200 W/mK, the speciﬁc heat capacity C = 900 J/kgK and the density ρ = 2700 kg/m3 . Each of the rods has a diameter of d = 0.01 m and a length of L = 0.1 m. The initial temperature of the rods is ϑ0 = ϑa = 20 ◦ C. When the heater is switched on, a heat ﬂow of 600 W is added to the 60 rods. Simultaneously the air cooling is switched on. Calculated with the aid of the ﬁnite element method the temporal and

Fig. 2.71: Cooling of electronic elements consisting of surface mounted rods in cross ﬂow local temperatures in the rods assuming that each rod recieves the same amount of heat

272

2 Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion

and that the heat released from the free parts of the baseplate might be neglected. The air temperature in some distance from the rod surface is alomst constant at 20 ◦ C. 2.23: A 75 mm thick wooden plate contains 2.8 % by mass water, relative to dry wood, which corresponds to a mass fraction of ξAα = 0.218. At equilibrium with the environment the mass fraction is reduced to ξAS = 0.065. How long does it take for the mass fraction of water in the middle of the plate to fall to ξA (x = 0) = 0.08? The diﬀusion coeﬃcient of water in wood is D = 1.2 · 10−9 m2 /s. 2.24: Instead of the 75 mm thick wooden plate in the previous exercise, a very long, square wooden trunk, with a side length of 75 mm is to be dried. The mass fraction of water and the diﬀusion coeﬃcient are the same as in the previous question: ξAα = 0.218, ξAS = 0.065, D = 1.2 · 10−9 m2 /s. How long will it take for the mass fraction of water in the core of the trunk to fall to ξA (x = 0, y = 0) = 0.08? 2.25: In a spray absorber, a waste gas containing ammonia will be puriﬁed with water. The waste gas and water droplets ﬂow countercurrent to each other as shown in Fig. 2.72. The saturated concentration of ammonia (substance A) for a temperature of 10 ◦ C of the spray water and a pressure of 0.11 MPa appears at the surface of the falling water droplets. The mass fraction of ammonia at saturation is ξA0 = 0.4. The following mass ﬂow rates and mass fractions are given: water feed M˙ W = 2.3 kg/s, waste gas feed M˙ Gi = 4.4 kg/s, G mass fraction of ammonia in the waste gas feed ξAi = 0.12; this should be reduced to a G = 0.006 in the waste gas exit stream; the mass fraction of ammonia in the value of ξAo L water outlet is allowed to reach ξAo = 0.24. The fraction of water in the waste gas is negligible.

Fig. 2.72: Treating a gas in a spray absorber a) What are the mass ﬂow rates M˙ Go of the waste gas, M˙ Lo of the waste water and what mass ﬂow rate of water M˙ W has to be fed into the absorber? b) After what period of time has the average mass fraction of NH3 in the water outlet L stream increased to ξAo = 0.24? The diameter of the water droplets is 3 mm and the diﬀusion coeﬃcient of NH3 in H2 O is D = 1.5 · 10−9 m2 /s. c) How high is the spray absorber if the water droplets are to fall through the rising waste gas with a velocity of w = 0.1 m/s?

2.7 Exercises

273

2.26: Dry polystyrene balls of diameter 60 mm are sprayed with water for 1 h. How much water does each ball take up if the diﬀusion coeﬃcient for water (substance A) in polystyrene (substance B) is D = 1.8 · 10−8 m2 /s?

•

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

In the ﬁrst chapter the heat transfer coeﬃcient was deﬁned by q˙ = α Δϑ and the mass transfer coeﬃcient for a substance A by n˙ A = β ΔcA This mass transfer coeﬃcient was valid for vanishing convective ﬂows and had to be corrected for ﬁnite convective ﬂows. These equations describe convective heat and mass transfer, but they are nothing more than deﬁnition equations for the heat transfer coeﬃcient α and the mass transfer coeﬃcient β, and should in no way be seen as laws for heat and mass transfer. Rather the laws of nature for the course of processes of heat and mass transfer are hidden in the heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients. Generally both are not constant, but locally variable and in transient processes they also change with time. In addition they depend on the ﬂow, the properties of the ﬂuid and the geometry of the heat or mass transfer surfaces. Therefore, the deﬁnition equations for heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients given above are not suitable for describing the mechanisms of heat and mass transfer. This is only possible with an in depth study of ﬂow and will be the subject of the following exposition. Basically we diﬀerentiate between forced and free ﬂow. A forced ﬂow is produced by external forces, for example when a ﬂow is caused by a pump or blower. A free ﬂow, on the other hand, is due to changes in density which are caused by temperature, pressure and concentration ﬁelds. We will discuss heat and mass transfer in forced ﬂow ﬁrst, moving onto free ﬂow at the end of the section.

3.1

Preliminary remarks: Longitudinal, frictionless ﬂow over a ﬂat plate

In order to discover how heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients change according to the ﬂow we will ﬁrst consider the longitudinal ﬂow over a ﬂat plate. We assume

276

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

that the ﬂow over the plate is at a constant average velocity wm . Synonymous with that is the assumption that the viscosity of the ﬂuid is vanishingly small. Real ﬂows adhere to the wall such that the ﬂow velocity increases asymptotically from zero at the wall to the velocity at the centre of the ﬂow. A ﬂuid with negligible viscosity will not adhere to the wall. These types of ﬂuids do not exist in practice, but their introduction enables us to calculate crude local temperature and concentration ﬁelds and from them the local heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients using the methods we already know. Through this the understanding of the general considerations with the decisive partial diﬀerential equations, which follow later, will be made easier. A ﬂuid at temperature ϑα ﬂows along a ﬂat plate with a constant average velocity wm , Fig. 3.1. The surface temperature of the plate is constant and equal to ϑ0 . If the plate is hotter than the ﬂuid ϑ0 > ϑα a temperature proﬁle develops, as shown in the left hand diagram in Fig. 3.1a. If however the plate is colder than the ﬂuid, ϑ0 < ϑα , the temperature proﬁle shown on the right in Fig. 3.1a, is formed. The temperature changes are limited to a thin layer close to the wall which increases along the ﬂow, because the temperature variation always propagates into the ﬂuid. The layer close to the wall of thickness δT (x), in which this temperature variation exists, is known as the thermal boundary layer, Fig. 3.1b. It stretches asymptotically into space, so a deﬁnition of its thickness has to be ascertained. For example, the boundary could be at the point where the temperature only very slightly deviates, by say 1 %, from the temperature of the core ﬂuid. In the thermal boundary the heat fed into a ﬂuid element by conduction is stored as internal energy and leaves with the ﬂuid element. This is ϑ = ϑ(x, y). Outside the thermal boundary layer a constant temperature ϑα prevails in the outer ﬂow. An observer moving with a ﬂuid element, at a distance y from the wall ﬁnds himself, after time t at the position x = wm t. For him the temperature ϑ(x, y) = ϑ(wm t, y) is only a function of time and the distance from the wall y, as the velocity wm should be constant. The temperature ϑ(t, y) of the observer can therefore be described by Fourier’s equation (2.14) for transient heat conduction, ∂ 2ϑ ∂ϑ =a 2 , ∂t ∂y

(3.1)

if we assume the thermal conductivity λ to be independent of temperature. At position x = 0 or at time t = 0 the initial temperature ϑα prevails. The temperature at the wall ϑ0 is given. The boundary conditions are ϑ(t = 0, y) = ϑα

(3.2)

ϑ(t, y = 0) = ϑ0 .

(3.3)

Together with (3.1) these boundary conditions also describe the temperature ﬁeld in a semi-inﬁnite body with the initial temperature ϑα , if the surface temperature suddenly assumes the constant value ϑ0 = ϑα . This problem has already been

3.1 Preliminary remarks: Longitudinal, frictionless ﬂow over a ﬂat plate

277

Fig. 3.1: a Temperature proﬁle and b Thermal boundary layer in ﬂow along a ﬂat plate

discussed in section 2.3.3.1. The solution is, cf. (2.124), y ϑ − ϑα = (ϑ0 − ϑα ) erfc √ . (3.4) 2 at The local heat transfer coeﬃcient α is obtained from the energy balance at the wall ∂ϑ . (3.5) q˙ = α(ϑ0 − ϑα ) = −λ ∂y y=0 The gradient present at the wall is yielded by diﬀerentiation of (3.4) to be ∂ϑ 1 . = −(ϑ0 − ϑα ) √ ∂y y=0 πat Which then gives the heat transfer coeﬃcient as α=√

λ πat

or with t = x/wm

wm 1 . (3.6) α= √ λ ax π The mean heat transfer coeﬃcient αm is the integral mean value over the plate length L L 1 1 wm α dx = 2 √ λ = 2α(x = L) . (3.7) αm = L aL π x=0

It is twice as big as the local heat transfer coeﬃcient at the position L. As (3.6) indicates, the local heat transfer coeﬃcient falls along the length by α ∼ x−1/2 . At the start of the plate x → 0 the heat transfer coeﬃcient is extremely large, α → ∞, and accordingly the transferred heat ﬂux will also be very big, q˙ → ∞. As the length x → ∞, the heat transfer coeﬃcient becomes negligibly small α → 0. An approximation of the thickness δT of the thermal boundary layer is obtained by linearising the temperature increase ∂ϑ ϑα − ϑ0 ≈ . ∂y y=0 δT

278

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Then from (3.5) λ . δT The heat transfer coeﬃcient is inversely proportional to the thickness of the thermal boundary layer. The resistance to heat transfer α≈

δT 1 ≈ α λ is therefore proportional to the thermal boundary layer thickness. It is very small at the start of the plate (δT → 0, α → ∞) and increases beyond all measure if the plate were inﬁnitely long (δT → ∞, α → 0). Using (3.6) we ﬁnd that the thermal boundary layer λ √ ax (3.8) δT ≈ = π α wm increases with the square root of the length x. The investigation of the problem in terms of mass transfer follows along the same lines. We will consider a ﬂat plate coated with a substance A, for example naphthalene, that diﬀuses into a ﬂuid, for example air, which is ﬂowing along the plate. So that our precondition for the ﬂow velocity wm of the ﬂuid along the plate is not altered, we have to assume that the amount of material transferred by diﬀusion is negligible when compared to the amount of material ﬂowing over the plate. The convection normal to the wall does not play a role. The concentration cA0 of substance A on the surface of the plate is constant, and the concentration of the ﬂuid arriving at the surface is cAα < cA0 . In the case of an ideal gas we get cA = NA /V = pA /Rm T , where cA0 is formed with the saturation pressure pA (ϑ0 ) at the plate surface, and cAα is formed with the partial pressure of substance A in the ﬂuid. A concentration proﬁle develops. In exactly the same way as the temperature variation from before, the concentration changes are limited to within a thin layer of thickness δc (x) close to the wall, that grows in the direction of ﬂow. This layer is called the concentration boundary layer. Once again for an observer moving in a volume element, it is a function of time and position, which is described by (2.380), known to us for transient diﬀusion, where we presume that the diﬀusion coeﬃcient is independent of concentration ∂cA ∂ 2 cA . =D ∂t ∂y2

(3.9)

cA (t = 0, y) = cAα

(3.10)

cA (t, y = 0) = cA0 .

(3.11)

The boundary conditions are

The analogous problem for heat conduction was given by (3.1) to (3.3). Correspondingly we obtain the solution related to (3.4) y . (3.12) cA − cAα = (cA0 − cAα ) erfc √ 2 Dt

3.1 Preliminary remarks: Longitudinal, frictionless ﬂow over a ﬂat plate

279

As cA = x˜A c, the concentration cA may be replaced here by the mole fraction x˜A . The local heat transfer coeﬃcient is obtained from a material balance at the wall ∂ x˜A . (3.13) n˙ A0 = β(cA0 − cAα ) = −cD ∂y y=0 The gradient at the wall is found by diﬀerentiating (3.12) to be ∂cA 1 . = −(cA0 − cAα ) √ ∂y y=0 πDt Which means the mass transfer coeﬃcient is D β=√ πDt or with t = x/wm

Dwm 1 . β=√ x π The mean mass transfer coeﬃcient βm over the plate length L 1 βm = L

(3.14)

L β dx = 2β(x = L) x=0

is twice as big as the local value at point L, just like for the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient. An approximation of the thickness δc of the concentration boundary layer follows from (3.13) by linearising the concentration proﬁle, c

cAα − cA0 ∂ x˜A x˜Aα − x˜A0 = , ≈c ∂y δc δc

and leads to the expression corresponding to (3.8) D √ Dx δc ≈ , = π β wm

(3.15)

according to which the thickness of the concentration boundary layer increases with the square root of the length x. It follows from (3.8) and (3.15) that the ratio between the thicknesses of the thermal and concentration boundary layers is given approximately by the Lewis number Le = a/D, which has already been introduced, see Table 1.5 √ δT ≈ Le . δc The heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients are also linked by the Lewis number due to (3.6) and (3.14) √ α a = = Le . cp β D As the Lewis number is of order one for ideal gases, the relationship (1.199): β = α/ cp , discussed earlier, holds.

280

3.2

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

The balance equations

Real ﬂows are not frictionless. As a result of friction, a ﬂow ﬁeld is formed with local and time related changes in the velocity. The temperature and concentration ﬁelds will not only be determined by conduction and diﬀusion but also by the ﬂow itself. The form and proﬁles of ﬂow, temperature and concentration ﬁelds are found by solving the mass, momentum and energy balances, which are the subject of the next section.

3.2.1

Reynolds’ transport theorem

The derivation of the balance equations is simpliﬁed by using Reynolds’ transport theorem. In order to derive it, we will observe a particular, inﬁnitesimally small ﬂuid mass dM and follow its movements in a ﬂow ﬁeld. The ﬂuid mass should always consist of the same parts; is occupies a certain volume and has a certain surface area. As the form of the ﬂuid volume generally changes during the course of its motion, its volume and the surface area can also change with time. The mass M of the bounded ﬂuid volume is found from the sum of all the mass elements dM M= dM , (M )

which, with the density

dM ΔM = , ΔV dV as a steady function of time and the position coordinate in a continuum, can also be written as dV . M= = lim

ΔV →0

V (t)

Correspondingly each of the other quantities of state Z, such as internal energy, enthalpy, and entropy among others, can be formed by integration of the associated speciﬁc state quantity. For the speciﬁc quantity of state z it holds that ΔZ dZ = , ΔM →0 ΔM dM

z = lim

which results in Z=

z dM =

M

z dV . V (t)

The speciﬁc quantity of state z can be a scalar, a vector or also a tensor of any rank. Just like the density, it is time and position dependent, whilst the extensive quantity of state Z is only time dependent.

3.2 The balance equations

281

The time derivative of Z will now be formed d dZ = z dV . dt dt V (t)

As an abbreviation for the quantity of state per volume we will write z = ZV from now on. This depends on both time and position. Then by deﬁnition it is dZ dt

Z(t + Δt) − Z(t) Δt ⎡ ⎤ 1 ⎢ ⎥ = lim ZV (t + Δt) dV − ZV (t) dV ⎦ , ⎣ Δt→0 Δt =

lim

Δt→0

V (t+Δt)

V (t)

in which the position dependence of ZV has not been written to prevent the expression becoming too confusing. The derivative can also be written as ⎤ ⎡ dZ 1 ⎢ ⎥ (ZV (t + Δt) − ZV (t)) dV + ZV (t) dV − ZV (t) dV ⎦ = lim ⎣ Δt→0 Δt dt V (t+Δt)

or dZ = dt

V (t+Δt)

ZV (t + Δt) − ZV (t) 1 lim dV + lim Δt→0 Δt→0 Δt Δt

V (t)

V (t)

ZV (t) dV .

(3.16)

ΔV (t)

The volume increase with time Δt is indicated here by ΔV (t) = V (t+Δt)−V (t).

Fig. 3.2: Deformation of a closed system of volume V (t) in a ﬂow

According to Fig. 3.2 the volume element is given by dV = wi dAi Δt.1 Which transforms the second integral into a surface integral, 1 ZV (t)wi dAi Δt = ZV (t)wi dAi , Δt A(t) 1

A(t)

In this and the following sections 3.3 and 3.4 as well as 3.6 and 3.9 we will use the tensor notation, because it allows the balance equations to be written very clearly. An overview of tensor notations can be found in Appendix A1.

282

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

and the formation of limits is superﬂuous, as the time interval Δt is no longer present. The integrand of the ﬁrst integral goes to ∂ZV /∂t according to the limits. Therefore, the Reynolds transport theorem is obtained from (3.16) for volumina, in which we put once again ZV = z dZ ∂(z ) z wi dAi . (3.17) = dV + dt ∂t V (t)

A(t)

The ﬁrst term on the right hand side of this equation shows how much the observed quantity of state Z has increased by in the volume V , at time t. The second term indicates which part of the state quantity ﬂows out with the material. The surface element dAi is, as shown in Fig. 3.2, by deﬁnition in the outward direction so that positive wi dAi indicates a ﬂow out of the volume. Clearly, according to (3.17), the change in the extensive quantity of state Z of a substance amount M with a volume V (t) that changes with time, is equal to the increase in the extensive quantity of state inside the volume V at time t and the fraction of the quantity of state that ﬂows out of the volume with the material at the same time. With the help of Gauss’ theorem the surface integral can be converted into a volume integral, giving dZ ∂(z ) ∂(z wi) dV . (3.18) = dV + dt ∂t ∂xi V (t)

V (t)

3.2.2

The mass balance

3.2.2.1

Pure substances

We will now apply (3.18) to the mass as an extensive quantity of state, i.e. Z = M and z = M/M = 1. Equation (3.18) then becomes dM ∂ ∂ wi dV . (3.19) = dV + dt ∂t ∂xi V (t)

V (t)

As by deﬁnition the mass dM of the inﬁnitesimally small subsystem being observed is constant, the mass of the whole system must also be constant, within the volume V (t) which changes with time. We are therefore considering a closed system, with dM /dt = 0. Due to the precondition of constant mass of the inﬁnitesimally small subsystem, (3.19) also holds for V (t) → 0. Therefore the sum of the two integrands must disappear. Which means we obtain ∂ ∂( wi ) =0 . + ∂t ∂xi

(3.20)

3.2 The balance equations

283

By diﬀerentiation ∂ ∂ ∂wi + wi + =0 ∂t ∂xi ∂xi the relationship equivalent to equation (3.20) is found to be d ∂wi + =0 , dt ∂xi

(3.21)

because we have d ∂ ∂ = + wi . dt ∂t ∂xi The equations (3.20) and (3.21) say that the mass is conserved in an inﬁnitesimally small volume element, and they are called continuity equations. In an incompressible ﬂuid the density remains constant, = const. The continuity equation is simpliﬁed to ∂wi =0 . ∂xi Example 3.1: Show, with help from (3.18) and (3.20), that the following equation is valid: dZ d dz = z dV = dV . dt dt dt V (t)

V (t)

Diﬀerentiation of the integrands on the right hand side also allows (3.18) to be written dZ d = dt dt

z dV

=

V (t)

z V (t)

=

∂ ∂z + ∂t ∂t

z V (t)

dV +

∂ ∂( wi ) + ∂t ∂xi

∂( wi ) ∂z z + wi dV ∂xi ∂xi

V (t)

dV +

V (t)

∂z ∂z + wi ∂t ∂xi

dV .

The use of the continuity equation (3.20) makes the ﬁrst integral on the right hand side disappear. The integrand in the brackets of the second integral is equal to the total diﬀerential dz ∂z ∂z = + wi . dt ∂t ∂xi Whereby the relationship dZ d = dt dt

V (t)

is proved.

z dV =

V (t)

dz dV dt

284

3.2.2.2

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Multicomponent mixtures

The continuity equation for any component A of a mixture consisting of N components will now be set up. We will only consider substance A. At time t it will enter the volume V (t) and have a surface area A(t). The discharge of substance A enlarges the volume represented in Fig. 3.2 by dV = wAi dAi Δt, where wAi is the ﬂow velocity of substance A. Transferring (3.16) to (3.17) and (3.18) means the gravitational velocity wi is replaced by the velocity wAi of substance A. Furthermore, for the extensive quantity of state Z in (3.17) we put the mass MA , z = MA /M = ξA and z = MA /V = A and with that we obtain dMA ∂ A A wAi dAi . (3.22) = dV + dt ∂t V (t)

A(t)

According to this equation the increase in substance A is made up of two parts: from the increase inside the system and from the amount of substance A which ﬂows out of the system. Γ˙ A is the production density (SI-units kg/m3 s) of component A in a volume element, so dMA Γ˙ A dV . = dt V (t)

The production density Γ˙ A changes, in general, with time and position. It is determined by the course of the chemical reaction in the system, and it is a task of reaction kinetics to investigate it. Converting the surface integral in (3.22) to a volume integral, using Gauss’ theorem, gives ∂ A ∂ A wAi ˙ΓA dV = dV + dV . ∂t ∂xi V (t)

V (t)

V (t)

As this relationship also holds for V (t) → 0, the integrands have to agree. Therefore we obtain ∂ A ∂( A wAi ) . (3.23) + Γ˙ A = ∂t ∂xi This type of mass balance is known as a component continuity equation. It can be set up for each component. This means that there are as many of these equations as there are components. The summation over the components all leads to a continuity equation for the total mass, due to Γ˙ K = 0, K = and K wKi = wi . In place of the N component continuity equations for a system of N components, N − 1 component continuity equations along with the continuity equation for the total mass can be used. ∗ The mass ﬂux A wAi in (3.23) can be found from the diﬀusional ﬂux jAi ∗ A wAi = jAi + A wi .

3.2 The balance equations

285

This transforms (3.23) into ∂ A ∂ ∗ Γ˙ A = (j + A wi ) + ∂t ∂xi Ai

(3.24)

or

∂ A ∂ ∂j ∗ + ( A wi ) = − Ai + Γ˙ A . ∂t ∂xi ∂xi Here the partial density A can be expressed in terms of the mass fraction ξA and the density A = ξA , so that the left hand side of the equation is rearranged into

∂(ξA ) ∂ ∂ ∂( wi ) ∂ξA ∂ξA + (ξA wi ) = ξA + + + wi . ∂t ∂xi ∂t ∂xi ∂t ∂xi The term in the square brackets disappears due to the continuity equation (3.20) for the total mass. The component continuity equation is then

∂ξA ∂ξA ∂j ∗ + wi = − Ai + Γ˙ A ∂t ∂xi ∂xi

or

dξA ∂j ∗ = − Ai + Γ˙ A . (3.25) dt ∂xi ∗ For a binary mixture, with the introduction of the diﬀusional ﬂow jAi according to (1.161) with DAB = DBA = D, this is transformed into ∂ξA ∂ξA ∂ ∂ξA = (3.26) + wi D + Γ˙ A . ∂t ∂xi ∂xi ∂xi

In the case of quiescent systems, wi = 0, this yields the relationship already known for transient diﬀusion, (2.378). If constant density is presumed, it follows from (3.26) that ∂ξA ∂ξA ∂ ∂ξA + wi = D + Γ˙ A / (3.27) ∂t ∂xi ∂xi ∂xi ˜ A cA / , in which cA is the molar concentration cA = NA /V , or with ξA = M ∂cA ∂cA ∂ + wi = ∂t ∂xi ∂xi

∂cA D ∂xi

+ r˙A

(3.28)

˜ A (SI-units kmol/m3 s), the amount of substance with the reaction rate r˙A = Γ˙ A /M A generated by chemical reaction. Example 3.2: Show that, under the presumption of ﬁlm theory — steady-state mass transfer only in the direction of the coordinate axis adjacent to the wall, vanishing production density — that the component continuity equation (3.25) transforms into (1.186) of ﬁlm theory. Indicating the coordinate adjacent to the wall with y, under the given preconditions, (3.25) is transformed into ∂ξA ∂j ∗ w =− A , ∂y ∂y

286

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow ∗ wherein jA is the diﬀusional ﬂow and w is the velocity in the y-direction. On the other hand, as a result of the continuity equation (3.20)

∂( w) =0 . ∂y With that w = const, and (3.25) can also be written as ∂ ∗ ∂ ∗ (j + w ξA ) = (j + A w) = 0 . ∂y A ∂y A ∗ ∗ Now, by deﬁnition from (1.155) jA = A (wA − w), and therefore jA + A w = A wA ˜ A N˙ A , which means that ∂(A wA )/∂y = 0 or dM˙ A /dy = 0, from which, because M˙ A = M eq. (1.186) dN˙ A /dy = 0 follows. This result can be found directly from (3.23), if Γ˙ A = 0, dA /dt = 0 are put in, and one-dimensional mass ﬂow is assumed.

3.2.3

The momentum balance

The mass elements of a ﬂowing ﬂuid transfer momentum. This is understood to be the product of the mass and velocity. A mass element dM , which ﬂows at a velocity of wj transports a momentum wj dM = wj dV . The total momentum Ij transported in a ﬂuid of volume V (t) is therefore Ij = wj dV . (3.29) V (t)

According to Newton’s second law of mechanics the change in momentum of a body with time is equal to the resultant of all the forces acting on the body

and therefore

d dt

dIj = Fj dt

(3.30)

wj dV = Fj .

(3.31)

V (t)

Applying the transport theorem gives, if we put z = wj into (3.17), ∂( wj ) wj wi dAi = Fj dV + ∂t V (t)

(3.32)

A(t)

or taking into account the continuity equation (3.20) (see also example 3.1) dwj dV = Fj (3.33) dt V (t)

3.2 The balance equations

287

with

∂wj dwj ∂wj = + wi . (3.34) dt ∂t ∂xi The forces Fj attacking the body can be split into two classes: in body forces which are proportional to the mass and in surface forces which are proportional to the surface area. The body forces have an eﬀect on all the particles in the body. They are far ranging forces and are caused by force ﬁelds. An example is the earth’s gravitational ﬁeld. The acceleration due to gravity gj acts on each molecule, so that the force of gravity on a ﬂuid element of mass ΔM is ΔFj = gj ΔM . It is proportional to the mass of the ﬂuid element. The body force is deﬁned by ΔFj dFj = ΔM →0 ΔM dM

kj := lim

(3.35)

and the surface force by fj := lim

ΔV →0

ΔFj dFj = . ΔV dV

(3.36)

In the case of gravitational force with kj = gj and fj = gj , in general it holds that fj = kj . Other body forces are centrifugal forces or forces created by electromagnetic ﬁelds. In the case of a multicomponent mixture, the diﬀerent eﬀects of the body forces on the individual components must also be considered. The body force kAj acting on component A will be deﬁned by ΔFAj dFAj kAj := lim = . ΔMA →0 ΔMA dM A dFKj = dV kKj K , where the summation Then dFAj = kAj dMA = kAj A dV and dFj = is formed over all the substances K. On the other hand, due to (3.35), dFj = kj dM = kj dV is valid and therefore kj = kKj K . (3.37) If the gravitational force is the only mass force acting on the body then gj = kj = kKj and = K .

The surface forces are short-range forces. They exist in the area immediately adjacent to the ﬂuid being considered and act on its surface. If ΔA is a surface element of a body with a force ΔFj acting on it, Fig. 3.3, then ΔFj dFj = ΔA→0 ΔA dA

tj := lim

(3.38)

is called the stress vector. It is not only dependent on the position and time but also on the orientation, and is therefore dependent on the normal vector to the surface element. In order to see this dependence we will consider a ﬂow along a ﬂat plate, Fig. 3.4. A normal force acts on a surface element ΔA perpendicular to

288

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Fig. 3.3: Surface force ΔFj on a surface element ΔA

Fig. 3.4: Dependence of the surface forces on the orientation of the surface element ΔA

the plate. If we imagine that the surface element is rotated at the same place to a position parallel to the wall, the element is only subjected to shear stress. The two forces are, in general, of diﬀerent magnitude. The total force acting at time t on a ﬂuid of volume V (t) and surface area A(t) is found by integrating the body and surface forces to be kj dV + tj dA . (3.39) Fj = V (t)

A(t)

With this the momentum equation (3.33) can be written as dwj kj dV + tj dA . dV = dt V (t)

V (t)

(3.40)

A(t)

It means that the change in momentum over time of a ﬂuid of volume V at time t is eﬀected by the body and the surface forces. 3.2.3.1

The stress tensor

For the calculation of the stress vector tj we will consider a ﬂuid element in the shape of an inﬁnitesimally small tetrahedron, Fig. 3.5, which has one surface in any direction whilst the others stretch along the coordinate axes. The oblique surface has a normal unit vector ni in the outward direction and an area dA.

Fig. 3.5: Equilibrium of surface forces

3.2 The balance equations

Fig. 3.6: Relationship between the areas

289

Fig. 3.7: Stress components on the surface dA1

The stress vector t acts on this area. Correspondingly, the stress vector t1 acts at the surface dA1 , perpendicular to the x-axis, and on the other two areas dA2 and dA3 we have the stress vectors t2 and t3. The forces acting on the four surface elements must be in equilibrium with each other independent of the momentary movement of the ﬂuid element. This immediately follows from the momentum equation (3.40), when it is applied to an inﬁnitesimally small volume element. At the limit V → 0 the volume integral disappears more rapidly than the surface integral, and therefore the surface forces are in equilibrium locally. Applying this to the tetrahedron gives t dA = t1 dA1 + t2 dA2 + t3 dA3 . The surface elements can be still be eliminated with the relationships from Fig. 3.6 of 1 1 dA1 = OD · BC dA = AD · BC , 2 2 and therefore OD dA1 = dA = dA cos α . AD Then, because cos α = n1 /n = n1 , we can also write dA1 = dA n1 . Correspondingly, it holds that dA2 = dA n2 , dA3 = dA n3 . The following relationship exists between the stress vectors t = t1 n1 + t2 n2 + t3 n3 .

(3.41)

Each of the stress vectors t1, t2 and t3 can be represented by the three components of stress, which are in any case forces over the unit area. Two indices are required to indicate the components of stress. By agreement the ﬁrst index relates to the area or surface on which the stress acts, and is identical to the index of the coordinate axis normal to this surface. The second index indicates in which

290

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

direction the stress component is acting. As an example, Fig. 3.7 shows the three components of stress over an area dA1 perpendicular to the x-axis. This is t1 = τ11 e1 + τ12 e2 + τ13 e3 and correspondingly t2 = τ21 e1 + τ22 e2 + τ23 e3 ,

(3.42)

t3 = τ31 e1 + τ32 e2 + τ33 e3 . The stress components form a tensor which ⎛ τ11 τ12 ⎜ τ τ τij = ⎜ ⎝ 21 22 τ31 τ32

is made up of nine components: ⎞ τ13 ⎟ τ23 ⎟ . ⎠ τ33

The stresses acting normal to the surface τ11 ,τ22 , τ33 or τij with i = j are known as normal stresses, the stresses tangential to the surface τij with i = j are called tangential or shear stresses. Due to the rule that shear stresses associated with each other are equal we can write τij = τji : the stress tensor is symmetrical. Putting the stress vectors from (3.42) into (3.41), gives t = (τ11 e1 + τ12 e2 + τ13 e3 ) n1 + (τ21 e1 + τ22 e2 + τ23 e3 ) n2 + (τ31 e1 + τ32 e2 + τ33 e3 ) n3 . On the other hand the stress vector t acting on the oblique surface of the tetrahedron in Fig. 3.5, can be split into its three components t1 , t2, t3 in the direction of the coordinate axes t = t1 e1 + t2 e2 + t3 e3 . As the comparison with the previous relationship shows, the following holds for the components of the stress vector t1 = τ11 n1 + τ21 n2 + τ31 n3 t2 = τ12 n1 + τ22 n2 + τ32 n3 t3 = τ13 n1 + τ23 n2 + τ33 n3 or tj = τji ni

(i, j = 1, 2, 3) .

(3.43)

Theoretically the stress tensor τji can be written as the sum of two tensors ⎞ ⎛ 1 ⎞ ⎛ 1 τ12 τ13 0 0 τkk τ11 − τkk ⎟ ⎜ 3 ⎟ ⎜ 3 ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ 1 1 ⎟ ⎜ ⎜ +⎜ 0 τji = ⎜ τ21 τ22 − τkk τ23 0 ⎟ τkk ⎟ ⎟ 3 3 ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ 1 1 0 0 τ31 τ32 τ33 − τkk τkk 3 3

3.2 The balance equations

291

or

1 δji τkk 3 with the unit tensor δji , also called the Kronecker-δ, ⎛ ⎞ 1 0 0 1 for i = j ⎜ ⎟ δji = i.e. δji = ⎝ 0 1 0 ⎠ . 0 for i = j 0 0 1 τji = τˆji +

(3.44)

(3.45)

From this deﬁnition it immediately follows that δji = δ11 + δ22 + δ33 = 3. We call τˆji the deviator of the tensor τji . It is thereby characterised such that the diagonal elements, the so-called trace of the tensor, disappear, which then gives (τ11 −

1 1 1 1 τkk ) + (τ22 − τkk ) + (τ33 − τkk ) = τkk − 3 · τkk = 0 . 3 3 3 3

In general a deviator is a tensor with a zero trace. As the diagonal elements characterise a normal stress and cancel each other out, the deviator is decisive for the shearing of a ﬂuid element, whilst the term 1/3 δij τkk contains normal stresses equal in all directions, or so-called hydrostatic stresses. The arithmetic mean value of the three normal stresses τkk are known as the average pressure 1 −¯ p = τkk . 3 The minus sign stems from the fact that liquids can take practically no tensile stresses in, and therefore τkk is generally negative, whereas the average pressure is positive. With this (3.44) can also be written as τji = τˆji − δji p¯ .

(3.46)

The average pressure p¯ is not identical to the thermodynamic pressure, which is obtained, for quiescent ﬂuids, from the thermal equation of state p = p(v, T ). However, we can show, see Appendix A2, that for fairly slow changes in volume the average and thermodynamic pressures are linked by p¯ − p := −ζ

∂wk , ∂xk

(3.47)

in which, the factor ζ > 0, deﬁned in this equation, is the so-called bulk viscosity (SI units kg/sm; 0.1 kg/sm = 1 Poise). Methods of statistical mechanics have shown that this bulk viscosity disappears in low density gases, and that it is very small in dense gases and liquids. Therefore in ﬂuid mechanics and heat and mass transfer we always presume ζ = 0, thereby setting the average pressure equal to the thermodynamic pressure. Furthermore in an incompressible ﬂuid, because ∂wk /∂xk = 0, the average pressure is always equal to the thermodynamic pressure.

292

3.2.3.2

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Cauchy’s equation of motion

By introducing the stress vector tj according to (3.43) into the momentum equation (3.40) we obtain

dwj dV = dt

V (t)

kj dV +

V (t)

τji ni dA . A(t)

With the help of Gauss’ law we rearrange the surface integral

τji ni dA = A(t)

and obtain

dwj dV = dt

V (t)

∂τji dV , ∂xi

V (t)

kj dV + V (t)

∂τji dV . ∂xi

V (t)

This equation holds for any volume V (t) and therefore also in the limiting case of V (t) → 0. From this follows Cauchy’s equation of motion 2 :

∂τji dwj = kj + dt ∂xi

(i, j = 1, 2, 3) .

(3.48)

It is valid for each continuum independent of the individual material properties and is therefore one of the fundamental equations in ﬂuid mechanics and subsequently also in heat and mass transfer. The movement of a particular substance can only be described by introducing a so-called constitutive equation which links the stress tensor with the movement of a substance. Generally speaking, constitutive equations relate stresses, heat ﬂuxes and diﬀusion velocities to macroscopic variables such as density, velocity and temperature. These equations also depend on the properties of the substances under consideration. For example, Fourier’s law of heat conduction is invoked to relate the heat ﬂux to the temperature gradient using the thermal conductivity. An understanding of the strain tensor is useful for the derivation of the consitutive law for the shear stress. This strain tensor is introduced in the next section. 2 Auguste-Louis Cauchy (1789–1857) was, as a contemporary of Leonhard Euler and CarlFriedrich Gauss, one of the most important mathematicians of the ﬁrst half of the 19th century. His most famous publications are “Trait´e des Fonctions” and “ M´echanique Analytique”. As he refused to take the oath to the new regime after the revolution in 1830, his positions as professor at the Ecole Polytechnique and at the Coll`ege de France were removed and he was dismissed from the Acad´emie Fran¸caise. He spent several years in exile in Switzerland, Turin and Prague. He was permitted to return to France in 1838, and it was there that he was reinstated as a professor at the Sorbonne after the revolution in 1848.

3.2 The balance equations

3.2.3.3

293

The strain tensor

The individual ﬂuid elements of a ﬂowing ﬂuid are not only displaced in terms of their position but are also deformed under the inﬂuence of the normal stresses τii and the shear stresses τij (i = j). The deformation velocity depends on the relative movement of the individual points of mass to each other. It is only in the case when the points of mass in a ﬂuid element do not move relatively to each other that the ﬂuid element behaves like a rigid solid and will not be deformed. Therefore a relationship between the velocity ﬁeld and the deformation, and with that also between the velocity ﬁeld and the stress tensor τij must exist. This relationship is required if we wish to express the stress tensor in terms of the velocities in Cauchy’s equation of motion. Normal stresses change the magnitude

Fig. 3.8: Deformation of a ﬂuid element due to normal stress

Fig. 3.9: For the relationship between deformation and velocity

of a ﬂuid element of given mass. If they are diﬀerent, for example τ11 = τ22 , the shape of the ﬂuid element will also be altered. As we can see in Fig. 3.8, a rectangle would be transformed into a prism, a spherical ﬂuid element could be deformed into an ellipsoid. Fig. 3.9 shows the front view of a cube which will be stretched by a normal stress τ11 . We recognise that the volume increases by ∂w1 ∂w1 dx1 dt dx2 dx3 = dt dV . ∂x1 ∂x1 Corresponding expressions for the volume increase due to normal stresses τ22 and τ33 can be obtained, so that the total volumetric increase is given by ∂w1 ∂w2 ∂w3 dt dV . + + ∂x1 ∂x2 ∂x3 The volume increase at each unit of time relative to the original volume is known as the dilatation. It is ∂w1 ∂w2 ∂w3 ∂wi + + = = ε˙ii . ∂x1 ∂x2 ∂x3 ∂xi

(3.49)

294

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

In an incompressible ﬂuid, = const, there is no dilatation, as we have seen from the continuity equation. The volume of a ﬂuid element of a given mass remains constant. The shear stresses τij (i = j) cause an originally cubic volume element to be deformed into a rhomboid, as shown in the view in Fig. 3.10. The original right angle at A changes by the angle dγ12 =

∂w1 dt and ∂x2

dγ21 =

∂w2 dt . ∂x1

The arithmetic mean of both angular velocities is called the strain tensor, often also called the deformation velocity tensor 1 ∂w1 ∂w2 ε˙12 := + 2 ∂x2 ∂x1 or in general ε˙ji :=

1 2

∂wj ∂wi + ∂xi ∂xj

.

(3.50)

It is a symmetrical tensor, as ε˙ji = ε˙ij , and transforms for i = j back to the dilatation. The elements ε˙ii form in this case the diagonal of the strain tensor. If the sum of these terms disappears, the volume of a ﬂuid element of given mass does not change, as already mentioned. If the tensor is split into two parts, from which the sum of the diagonal of one of the tensors, the deviator, disappears, this describes the change in shape at constant volume. The shape change at constant volume will, thus, be described by the deviator of the strain tensor. In order to split up the deviator we can form ε˙ji = εˆ˙ji +

1 δji ε˙kk . 3

As follows with (3.49) and (3.50), we have

2 1 ∂wk ∂wj ∂wi ˆ − δji . + ε˙ji = 2 ∂xi ∂xj 3 ∂xk

Fig. 3.10: The deformation of a cubic volume element into a rhomboid

(3.51)

(3.52)

3.2 The balance equations

When written out, (3.51) means ⎛ 1 ε˙12 ε˙13 ⎜ ε˙11 − 3 ε˙kk ⎜ 1 ε˙ji = ⎜ ε˙21 ε˙22 − ε˙kk ε˙23 ⎜ 3 ⎝ 1 ε˙31 ε˙32 ε˙33 − ε˙kk 3

⎞

295

⎛

⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟+⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎠ ⎝

1 0 0 ε˙kk 3 1 0 0 ε˙kk 3 1 0 0 ε˙kk 3

⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ . ⎟ ⎠

The ﬁrst term is already the desired deviator, as its trace disappears, this is then 1 1 1 1 ε˙11 − ε˙kk + ε˙22 − ε˙kk + ε˙33 − ε˙kk = ε˙kk − 3 ε˙kk = 0 . 3 3 3 3 Whilst the deviator describes the change in shape at constant volume, the (isotropic) tensor 1/3 δij ε˙kk = 1/3 δij ∂wk /∂xk is decisive for the volume change for a constant shape. This follows from the fact that it only contains equal diagonals, so that the deformation in all coordinate directions is the same. 3.2.3.4

Constitutive equations for the solution of the momentum equation

In order to solve Cauchy’s equation of motion, which is valid for any substance, a further relationship between the stress and strain tensors, or between the stress tensor and the velocity ﬁeld is required. This type of equation, a so-called constitutive equation, is material speciﬁc and similar to the equations of state in thermodynamic characteristics for a certain substance. As a result of (3.46) and (3.47) it still generally holds that ∂wk τji = τˆji − δji p − ζ . (3.53) ∂xk The elements present in the deviator τˆji of the stress tensor cause the stretching described by the elements in the deviator εˆ˙ji of the stress tensor, which can be seen by a comparison of the two deviators. Therefore a substance speciﬁc relationship τˆji := f (εˆ˙ji ) must exist. For low strain velocities a linear approach suggests itself τˆji = η 2 εˆ˙ji .

(3.54)

The factor of 2 is introduced, so that, for a one-dimensional incompressible ﬂow (j = 1, i = 2; ∂wk /∂xk = 0) with εˆ˙ = (1/2) ∂w1 /∂x2 from (3.52), Newton’s law τ12 = η ∂w1 /∂x2 is obtained. A ﬂuid in which the shear stress is proportional to the shear velocity, corresponding to this law, is called an ideal viscous or Newtonian ﬂuid. Many gases

296

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

and liquids follow this law so exactly that they can be called Newtonian ﬂuids. They correspond to ideal Hookeian bodies in elastomechanics, in which the shear strain is proportional to the shear. A series of materials cannot be described accurately by either Newtonian or Hookeian behaviour. The relationship between shear stress and strain can no longer be described by the simple linear rule given above. The study of these types of material is a subject of rheology. After introducing εˆ˙ji according to (3.52), (3.54) is transformed into

τˆji = η

∂wj ∂wi + ∂xi ∂xj

2 ∂wk − δji 3 ∂xk

.

(3.55)

The factor η deﬁned in (3.54) and (3.55) is the dynamic viscosity (SI units kg/sm = 1 Pa · s; 0.1 kg/sm = 1 Poise). With the help of (3.53) we obtain, for the stress tensor

∂wk 2 ∂wk ∂wj ∂wi τji = η − δji − δji p − ζ . (3.56) + ∂xi ∂xj 3 ∂xk ∂xk

3.2.3.5

The Navier-Stokes equations

We will presume a Newtonian ﬂuid and neglect the normally very small bulk viscosity. The statement (3.56) for the stress tensor is then transformed into Stokes’ formulation, the so-called Stokes hypothesis:

2 ∂wj ∂wi ∂wk − δji − δji p . + (3.57) τji = η ∂xi ∂xj 3 ∂xk Putting this expression into Cauchy’s equation of motion, (3.48), yields the socalled Navier-Stokes equation

dwj ∂wk 2 ∂p ∂ ∂wj ∂wi = kj − − δji . (3.58) + η + dt ∂xj ∂xi ∂xi ∂xj 3 ∂xk For an incompressible ﬂuid we have ∂wk /∂xk = ∂wi /∂xi = 0. Furthermore, if we presume a constant viscosity, the equation is simpliﬁed to

∂p ∂ 2 wj dwj +η . = kj − dt ∂xj ∂xi 2

(3.59)

The equation clearly shows that the forces acting on a ﬂuid element are made up of body, pressure and viscous forces. A momentum balance exists for each of the three coordinate directions j = 1, 2, 3, so that (3.58) and (3.59) each represent three equations independent of each other. (3.59) can be seen written out in Appendix A3. Its formulation for cylindrical coordinates is also given there.

3.2 The balance equations

3.2.4

297

The energy balance

Pure substances According to the ﬁrst law of thermodynamics, the internal energy U of a closed system changes due to the addition of heat Q12 and work W12 into the system U2 − U1 = Q12 + W12 or in diﬀerential form dU = dQ + dW

(3.60)

or

dU dQ dW = + = Q˙ + P . (3.61) dt dt dt We will apply these equations to a ﬂuid element of given mass. As this will be considered to be a closed system we can immediately exclude mass transport over the system boundary and with that diﬀusion. With the help of the transport theorem (3.17), by putting in z = u, we obtain the following temporal change in the internal energy of a ﬂowing ﬂuid dU d ∂u u dV = u wi dAi . (3.62) = dV + dt dt ∂t V (t)

V (t)

A(t)

According to this, the change in internal energy over time in a ﬂowing ﬂuid is equal to internal energy stored inside the ﬂuid volume V (t) at time t, and the internal energy ﬂowing out over the surface A(t) of the ﬂuid volume. Heat is transferred, by deﬁnition, between a system and its surroundings, and therefore the heat fed into the system via its surface is ˙ Q= q˙ dA , (3.63) A(t)

in which q˙ is the heat ﬂux. It is a scalar. (3.63), with the normal vector n, which indicates the orientation of the surface elements in space, can also be written as Q˙ = (q˙ ni )( dA ni ) A(t)

because ni ni = 1. The products obtained dA ni = dAi

(i = 1, 2, 3)

are, as shown in section 3.2.3.1, the projections of the surface dA on the plane formed by the coordinate axes. It is known that dAi are the components of the surface vector n dA. Correspondingly, q˙ ni = −q˙i

(3.64)

298

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

can be interpreted as the components of a vector q˙ of the heat ﬂux. q˙1 is the heat ﬂux over the area dA1, q˙2 is that over dA2 and q˙3 that over dA3 . The minus sign in (3.64) stems from the fact that a heat ﬂux fed into a system is counted as positive, but the normal vector ni of a closed area points outwards. With that we get Q˙ = − q˙i ni dA . (3.65) A(t)

The work done to change the internal energy of a system is exchanged between the system and its surroundings and “ﬂows” over the surface of the system. The body forces displace each element as a whole, and therefore also contribute to the change in the kinetic and potential energy, but not to the change in the internal energy, as long as the mass of the ﬂuid element is not altered by mass exchange with its neighbours. In this case the individual particles will move at diﬀerent speeds and the body forces acting on them will contribute to the total power. This contribution plays an important role in multicomponent mixtures and must be taken into account there. In addition the surface forces contain parts which cause a change in the internal energy, and some that displace the ﬂuid element as a whole without changing its internal energy. The fraction of the power, which contributes to a change in the internal energy, fed into the system via its surface can also be written as P := ω˙ dA . (3.66) A(t)

The power density ω˙ (SI units W/m2 ) is deﬁned by this equation. We choose the letter ω˙ for the power density, rather than w, ˙ otherwise it would be easy to confuse it with velocity w. Similar to the considerations for heat ﬂux, (3.66) can be rearranged into P =

(ωn ˙ i )( dAni ) A(t)

and here the quantities ωn ˙ i = −ω˙ i

(3.67)

can be interpreted as the components of the vector ω˙ of the power density; ω˙ 1 is the power density across the area dA1 , ω˙ 2 that across the area dA2 and ω˙ 3 that across the area dA3. The minus sign appears once more because the power being fed into the system is taken to be positive. It holds, therefore, that P =− ω˙ i ni dA . (3.68) A(t)

The ﬁrst law (3.61), in conjunction with the expressions for internal energy

3.2 The balance equations

299

(3.62), the heat ﬂow (3.65) and the power (3.68), can also be written as ∂(u ) dV + u wi dAi = − q˙i ni dA − ω˙ i ni dA . ∂t V (t)

A(t)

A(t)

A(t)

Converting the surface into the volume integral using Gauss’ law and then transferring to a small volume element V (t) → 0 yields ∂(u ) ∂(u wi ) ∂ q˙i ∂ ω˙ i =− − . + ∂t ∂xi ∂xi ∂xi The left hand side can also be written as

∂u ∂ ∂( wi ) ∂u +u +u + wi . ∂t ∂t ∂xi ∂xi

By taking into account the continuity equation (3.20), the equation above is simpliﬁed to ∂u ∂u du + wi . = ∂t ∂xi dt Which then gives the energy equation

du ∂ ω˙ i ∂ q˙i − . =− dt ∂xi ∂xi

(3.69)

In order to calculate the power density ω˙ i , we will now consider the total power Ptot produced by the surface forces and separate from that the part known as the drag, which causes a displacement of the ﬂuid element. This then leaves only the power which contributes to a change in the internal energy. Using the stress tensor ti = τji nj the total power from the surface forces is obtained as ∂(wi τji ) wi ti dA = wi τji nj dA = dV . Ptot = ∂xj A(t)

A(t)

V (t)

On the other hand, the surface forces acting on the volume element ∂τji Fi = ti dA = τji nj dA = dV ∂xj A(t)

A(t)

V (t)

cause a movement of the system. The force acting on a volume element dV dFi =

∂τji dV ∂xj

displaces it during a short time dt along a path dxi , such that the drag is dFi

dxi dxi ∂τji ∂τji dV dV wi . = = dt ∂xj dt ∂xj

300

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

The total drag is therefore

∂τji wi dV , ∂xj

PS = V (t)

and the part of the surface forces contributing to the change in internal energy will be ∂(wi τji ) ∂τji P = Ptot − PS = − wi dV , ∂xj ∂xj V (t)

out of which

τji

P =

∂wi dV ∂xj

V (t)

follows. As (3.68) can be rearranged using Gauss’ law into ∂ ω˙ i P =− dV ∂xi V (t)

then −

∂ ω˙ i ∂wi = τji . ∂xi ∂xj

(3.70)

The energy balance (3.69) is given by

du ∂wi ∂ q˙i + τji . =− dt ∂xi ∂xj

(3.71)

As we have taken the ﬂuid element to be a closed system, this equation is not valid for multicomponent mixtures and diﬀusion. Multicomponent mixtures Diﬀusion appears in multicomponent mixtures when they are not at equilibrium. Individual material ﬂows cross over the system boundaries. Therefore a closed system cannot be presupposed. The ﬁrst law now becomes [3.1], p.41 hK d(e MK ) dU = dQ + dW + K

or

dU hKe M˙ K . = Q˙ + P + dt

(3.72)

K

Here, for a particular substance A, the quantity hA = (∂H/∂MA )T, p, MK=A is the partial speciﬁc enthalpy and e M˙ A is the mass ﬂow rate of component A fed into the system from outside. The sum is made over all the material ﬂows. The heat ﬂow Q˙ and the power P are calculated in the same way as before from ∂ q˙i q˙i ni dA = − dV Q˙ = − ∂xi A(t)

V (t)

3.2 The balance equations

and

P =−

ω˙ i ni dA = −

A(t)

V (t)

301

∂ ω˙ i dV . ∂xi

Substance A ﬂowing at a velocity wAi across the surface element is an energy carrier. It increases the internal energy of a ﬂuid element moving with the centre of mass velocity wi by ∗ ni dA . −hA A (wAi − wi )ni dA = −hA jAi

Once again the minus sign is necessary because energy ﬂowing into a system is counted as positive, but the surface vector has the opposite sign. The energy from all the feed streams ﬂowing over the total surface is ∂(hK j ∗ ) ∗ Ki hKe M˙ K = − hK jKi ni dA = − dV . ∂xi K

K

K

A(t)

V (t)

When this is applied to a ﬂuid element, the energy equation (3.72) for a multicomponent mixture can be written as ∗ du ∂ ω˙ i ∂(hK jKi ∂ q˙i ) − − . (3.73) =− dt ∂xi ∂xi ∂xi K

The power density ω˙ i which appears here consists of the power from the surface forces minus the drag forces, which displace the ﬂuid element as a whole and therefore do not contribute to a change in the internal energy. In contrast to the equation for pure substances this also contains an additional term because the diﬀerent particle types move with diﬀerent velocities wAi , such that the associated body forces kAi on substance A in a volume element dV deliver a contribution of ∗ kAi dV . A (wAi − wi )kAi dV = jAi For all the substances, the contribution on a system of volume V (t) would be ∗ jKi kKi dV . K

V (t)

The total power P for the change in the internal energy is made up of the power of the surface forces ∂(wi τji ) wi ti dA = wi τji nj dA = dV ∂xi A(t)

A(t)

V (t)

and the body forces

K

V (t)

minus the drag force

V (t)

τji

P = V (t)

∗ jKi kKi dV

∂τji wi dV . ∂xj

∂wi ∗ + jKi kKi ∂xj

dV .

K

Then for the power density, it follows, due to P =− ω˙ i ni dA = − A(t)

V (t)

∂ ω˙ i dV , ∂xi

302

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

that −

∂ ω˙ i ∂wi ∗ = τji + jKi kKi . ∂xi ∂xj

(3.74)

K

It is∗ diﬀerent to the power density (3.70) for pure substances due to the presence of the term jKi kKi for the power exerted by the body forces on the individual substances. The energy K

equation (3.73) is transformed to the following for multicomponent mixtures

∂wi ∗ du ∂ q˙ + jKi kKi = − i + τji dt ∂xi ∂xj

(3.75)

K

with

q˙i = q˙i +

∗ hK jKi ,

(3.76)

K

which is transformed into the energy balance (3.71) for pure substances when a vanishing diﬀu∗ = 0 exists. sion ﬂow jKi

3.2.4.1

Dissipated energy and entropy

The energy equation (3.71), clearly shows that the internal energy in a ﬂuid element is changed by the inﬂux of heat and the performance of work. In the case of multicomponent mixtures, as shown in (3.75), a further term for the energy fed into the system with the material is added. The work done consists of the reversible part and the dissipated work. We want to calculate these contributions individually with the help of an entropy balance. For the sake of simplicity we will only consider pure substances. According to Gibbs’ fundamental equation, we have T

ds du dv du p d = +p = − 2 . dt dt dt dt dt

(3.77)

Inserting the energy equation (3.71) and the continuity equation (3.21) yields T Now we use

1 p ∂wi 1 ∂ q˙i ds ∂wi + τji + . =− dt ∂xi ∂xj ∂xi 1 ∂ q˙i q˙i ∂T ∂(q˙i /T ) = − 2 ∂xi T ∂xi T ∂xi

or

∂ q˙i ∂(q˙i /T ) q˙i ∂T =T + ∂xi ∂xi T ∂xi

and according to (3.53) τji = τˆji − δji p , if we presume that the bulk viscosity disappears. With that we can write the entropy balance (3.77) as ∂(q˙i /T ) ds ∂wi p ∂wi q˙i ∂T 1 1 ∂wi =− −δji p + − 2 + τˆji + . dt ∂xi T ∂xi T ∂xj T ∂xj T ∂xi Because δji ∂wi /∂xj = ∂wj /∂xj = ∂wi /∂xi this equation simpliﬁes to

ds ∂wi ∂(q˙i /T ) q˙i ∂T 1 =− − 2 + τˆji . dt ∂xi T ∂xi T ∂xj

(3.78)

3.2 The balance equations

303

The ﬁrst term on the right hand side of (3.78) represents the entropy fed in with the heat. This is known as the entropy flux. The two remaining terms represent the production of entropy. The second term stems from the ﬁnite temperature diﬀerences in thermal conduction, the third from the mechanical energy. We call ∂wi φ := τˆji (3.79) ∂xj the viscous dissipation. This is the mechanically dissipated energy (SI units W/m3 ) per unit volume. Taking (3.53) into consideration τji = τˆji − δji p the ﬁrst law (3.71) can also be written

du ∂ q˙i ∂wi =− −p +φ . dt ∂xi ∂xi

(3.80)

Vanishing bulk viscosity is also presupposed here. Introducing the viscous dissipation into the energy equation (3.75) for multicomponent mixtures, gives

du ∂ q˙ ∂wi ∗ =− i −p +φ+ jKi kKi . dt ∂xi ∂xi

(3.81)

K

Likewise (3.81) presupposes vanishing bulk viscosity. The derivation of the entropy balance for mixtures can be found in Appendix A 5. Example 3.3: Calculate the viscous dissipation for a Newtonian ﬂuid. How large is the viscous dissipation for the special case of one dimensional ﬂow w1 = w1 (x2 )? For a Newtonian ﬂuid, according to (3.55) we have

∂wj ∂wi 2 ∂wk τˆji = η + − δji ∂xi ∂xj 3 ∂xk and therefore φ = τˆji

∂wi ∂wi =η ∂xj ∂xj

∂wj ∂wi + ∂xi ∂xj

−

2 ∂wk δji 3 ∂xk

.

In the case of w1 = w1 (x2 ) the expression is reduced to φ=η

3.2.4.2

∂w1 ∂w1 =η ∂x2 ∂x2

∂w1 ∂x2

2 .

Constitutive equations for the solution of the energy equation

In order to be able to solve the energy equation (3.71) or (3.75), some constitutive equations are required. We will now consider equation (3.71) for pure substances. This necessitates the introduction of the caloric equation of state u = u(ϑ, v). By diﬀerentiation we obtain ∂u ∂u ∂u du = dϑ + dv = cv dϑ + dv ∂ϑ v ∂v ϑ ∂v ϑ

304

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

In thermodynamics, as shown, for example, in [3.2], ∂u ∂p =T −p . ∂v ϑ ∂ϑ v Furthermore dv = − d / 2 . This leads to

1 d du dϑ ∂p −p = cv − T . dt dt ∂ϑ v dt

(3.82)

With the continuity equation (3.21) we obtain for this

du dϑ ∂p ∂wi = cv + T −p . dt dt ∂ϑ v ∂xi The expression in the square brackets disappears for ideal gases. For incompressible ﬂuids, = const, we have d /dt = 0 and ∂wi /∂xi = 0. The expression is simpliﬁed in both cases to du dϑ = cv . dt dt In incompressible ﬂuids it is not necessary to diﬀerentiate between cp and cv , cp = cv = c. While in an isotropic body, the heat ﬂux is given by Fourier’s law q˙i = −λ

∂ϑ , ∂xi

in nonisotropic materials, for example in crystals, there are preferred directions for heat ﬂow. The heat ﬂux q˙i is no longer dependent on just the gradients ∂ϑ/∂xi but also in the most general case on all three components of the temperature gradients. For example, for the heat ﬂux q˙1 in the direction of the x-axis, it holds that ∂ϑ ∂ϑ ∂ϑ ∂ϑ −q˙1 = λ11 + λ21 + λ31 = λi1 . ∂x1 ∂x2 ∂x3 ∂xi There are corresponding expressions for the other two heat ﬂuxes, so that in general, we can write q˙i = −λji

∂ϑ ∂xi

(i, j = 1, 2, 3)

The heat ﬂux in the direction of a coordinate axis depends on the temperature gradients in the direction of all the coordinate axes. The thermal conductivity λji in Fourier’s law is a tensor. As we can prove with methods of thermodynamics for irreversible processes [3.3], the thermal conductivity tensor is symmetrical λij = λji . It consists of six components. Out of these, for certain crystals a few or several agree with each other or disappear.

3.2 The balance equations

305

Example 3.4: Quartz crystals have diﬀerent thermal conductivities along the directions of the individual coordinate axes. The thermal conductivity tensor is given by ⎛ ⎞ λ11 0 0 0 ⎠ . λji = ⎝ 0 λ22 0 0 λ33 What is the diﬀerential equation for steady-state heat conduction, if λii is presumed to be independent of temperature? What is the ratio of heat ﬂows by conduction in a cube of side length a in the three coordinate directions? As an approximate solution of this part of the question, presume that the heat ﬂows in the three coordinate directions are independent of each other. As no ﬂow is present, the term τji ∂wi /∂xj vanishes from the energy equation (3.71). Steady-state conduction is presumed, du/dt = 0, which means the energy equation is simpliﬁed to ∂ q˙i ∂ q˙1 ∂ q˙2 ∂ q˙3 =0= + + . ∂xi ∂x1 ∂x2 ∂x3 For the Quartz crystal q˙1 = −λ11 ∂ϑ/∂x1 , q˙2 = −λ22 ∂ϑ/∂x2 , q˙3 = −λ33 ∂ϑ/∂x3 . The energy equation is thereby transformed into 0 = λ11

∂2ϑ ∂2ϑ ∂2ϑ + λ22 + λ33 . 2 2 ∂x1 ∂x2 ∂x3 2

Under the assumption that the heat ﬂows in the three coordinate directions are independent of each other, we have 0 = λ11

∂ 2 ϑ1 ∂ 2 ϑ2 ∂ 2 ϑ3 = λ = λ . 22 33 ∂x1 2 ∂x2 2 ∂x3 2

The temperature proﬁle between the cube surfaces opposite each other is linear. The heat ﬂuxes are then q˙1 = λ11 Δϑ1 /a, q˙2 = λ22 Δϑ2 /a, q˙3 = λ33 Δϑ3 /a, and q˙1 : q˙2 : q˙3 = λ11 Δϑ1 : λ22 Δϑ2 : λ33 Δϑ3 . In the case of equal temperature diﬀerences we get q˙1 : q˙2 : q˙3 = λ11 : λ22 : λ33 .

3.2.4.3

Some other formulations of the energy equation

For practical calculations it is often advantageous to use other dependent variables instead of the internal energy in the energy equation. Especially useful are the “enthalpy” and the “temperature form” of the energy equation. The enthalpy form is obtained, due to h = u +pv, by the addition of d(pv)/dt to both sides of the energy equation (3.80), giving

dh ∂ q˙i ∂wi d(pv) =− −p + +φ . dt ∂xi ∂xi dt

The third term on the right hand side is

d(pv) dp dv dp 1 d = v + p = − p dt dt dt dt dt

306

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

from which, using the continuity equation (3.21)

dp ∂wi d(pv) = +p dt dt ∂xi

is obtained. This yields a form of the energy equation valid for both compressible and incompressible ﬂow

dh ∂ q˙i dp + =− +φ . dt ∂xi dt

(3.83)

Correspondingly, for multicomponent mixtures, we ﬁnd from (3.81) with q˙i = q˙i +

dp ∗ ∂ q˙ dh jKi kKi + φ =− i + + dt ∂xi dt K

(3.84)

∗ hK jKi .

K

The temperature form of the energy equation is especially important, as its solution describes the temperature ﬁeld in terms of time and space. For pure substances, this equation is obtained, if we make use of the well known relationship from thermodynamics [3.2] ∂v dh = cp dϑ − T − v dp . ∂ϑ p and with that eliminate the enthalpy diﬀerential in (3.83). In addition q˙i = −λ∂ϑ/∂xi . This yields ∂ϑ T ∂v dϑ dp ∂ λ + cp = +φ . (3.85) dt ∂xi ∂xi v ∂ϑ p dt For ideal gases, because of pv = RT , the expression will be T ∂v T ∂v = =1 . v ∂ϑ p v ∂T p The enthalpy of mixtures is dependent on temperature, pressure and composition. Its differential is given by ∂v − v dp + hK dξK , (3.86) dh = cp dϑ − T ∂ϑ p K when hA is the partial speciﬁc enthalpy of substance A, deﬁned by ∂H . hA = ∂MA T,p,MK=A Therefore, taking into consideration the continuity equation (3.25), this becomes dh dp dϑ ∂j ∗ T ∂v hK Ki + hK Γ˙ K . = cp + 1− − dt dt v ∂ϑ p dt ∂xi K

K

3.2 The balance equations

307

After inserting this expression into the energy equation (3.84), and some rearranging, we get cp

dϑ dt

∂ϑ T ∂v ∂ dp λ + +φ ∂xi ∂xi v ∂T p dt ∂hK ∗ kKi − − jKi hK Γ˙ K + ∂xi

=

K

K

As shown in Appendix A5, the partial speciﬁc enthalpy hK in the penultimate sum can be eliminated and replaced by the speciﬁc enthalpy h of the mixture, because N

N −1 ∂h ∂hK ∂ ∗ = jKi ∂xi ∂xi ∂ξK

∗ jKi

K=1

K=1

holds, where the derivative ∂h/∂ξK is formed at ﬁxed temperature, pressure and all mass fractions except ξK . The temperature form of the energy equation for mixtures is now cp

dϑ dt

=

dp ∂ϑ T ∂v + +φ ∂xi v ∂ϑ p dt

N −1 ∂ ∂h ∗ kKi − − jKi hK Γ˙ K . + ∂xi ∂ξK ∂ ∂xi

λ

K=1

(3.87)

K

Equations (3.85) and (3.87) are valid irrespective of whether the ﬂuid is compressible or incompressible.

It is known that incompressible ﬂuids represent a useful model for real ﬂuids in ﬂuid mechanics and heat and mass transfer. Their thermal equation of state is v = v0 = const. For pure substances and also for mixtures, isobaric and isochoric speciﬁc heat capacities agree with each other, cp = cv = c. The temperature form of the energy equation for incompressible pure substances is yielded from (3.85) under the assumption of constant thermal conductivity c

dϑ ∂ 2ϑ +φ . =λ dt ∂xi 2

(3.88)

If the ﬂow is isobaric, the second term on the right hand side of (3.85) disappears. In the case of an ideal gas (T /v)(∂v/∂ϑ)p = 1 has to be put into (3.85). In incompressible mixtures we ﬁnd from (3.87), presuming constant thermal conductivity, c

∂ ∂2 ϑ dϑ ∂h ∗ + φ + j − hK Γ˙ K . =λ k − Ki Ki dt ∂xi 2 ∂x ∂ξ i K K K

(3.89)

The energy balance for mixtures is diﬀerent from that for pure substances as it contains two additional expressions, one for the energy transport by mass diﬀusion and one for the enthalpy or temperature changes produced by chemical reactions.

308

3.2.5

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Summary

The most important balance equations derived in this chapter shall be summarised here. In this summary we will use the abbreviation d ∂ ∂ = + wi . dt ∂t ∂xi The following balance equations are valid for pure substances: ∂wi d = − , dt ∂xi ∂τji dwj , = kj + dt ∂xi

(3.91)

du ∂wi ∂ q˙i =− + τji . dt ∂xi ∂xj

(3.92)

(3.90)

Equation (3.90) is the mass balance or continuity equation, (3.91) the momentum balance or Cauchy’s equation of motion and (3.92) is the energy balance. As a momentum balance exists for each of the three coordinate directions, j = 1, 2, 3, there are ﬁve balance equations in total. The enthalpy form (3.83) is equivalent to the energy balance (3.92). In multicomponent mixtures N − 1 mass balances for the components have to be added to the continuity equation, see (3.25), whilst the energy balance is replaced by (3.81) or (3.87). The system of equations still has to be supplemented by the so-called constitutive equations or material laws which describe the behaviour of the materials being investigated. If the frequently used case of an incompressible Newtonian ﬂuid, = const, d /dt = 0, of constant viscosity is presumed, the continuity equation, momentum and energy balances are transformed into ∂wi =0 , ∂xi

(3.93)

∂p ∂ 2 wj dwj +η , = kj − dt ∂xj ∂xi 2

(3.94)

dϑ ∂ 2ϑ +φ =λ dt ∂xi 2

(3.95)

c with φ=η

∂wi ∂xj

∂wj ∂wi + ∂xi ∂xj

Equation (3.94) is the Navier-Stokes equation for an incompressible ﬂuid.

3.2 The balance equations

309

For multicomponent mixtures of N components, in addition to the continuity equations for the total mass (3.93), we also need continuity equations for N − 1 components d A ∂j ∗ = − Ai + Γ˙ A . (3.96) dt ∂xi The momentum balance (3.94) remains unchanged, whilst for the energy equation we obtain (3.89): c

N −1 dϑ ∂ 2ϑ ∂ ∂h ∗ =λ + φ + j k − − hK Γ˙ K . Ki Ki dt ∂xi2 ∂xi ∂ξK K=1 K

(3.97)

Example 3.5: A so-called Couette ﬂow consists of a ﬂuid between two parallel, inﬁnitely large plates, where one plate — the top one in Fig. 3.11 — moves with constant velocity wL whilst the other plate is kept still.

Fig. 3.11: Couette ﬂow A good example of this type of ﬂow is oil in a friction bearing. Here we will consider an incompressible steady-state ﬂow, whose velocity proﬁle is given by w1 (x2 ). Furthermore ∂/∂t = 0, w2 = w3 = 0. Find the velocity proﬁle w1 (x2 ). The temperature of the upper plate is ϑL , and that of the lower is ϑ0 < ϑL . Calculate and discuss the pattern of the temperature proﬁle ϑ(x2 ), under the assumption that the viscous dissipation cannot be neglected. Velocities are only present along the x1 -axis. This means that only the momentum equation (3.94), for j = 1 has to be considered. In this equation the left hand side disappears, as ∂/∂t = 0, ∂w/∂x1 = 0, w2 = w3 = 0. Futhermore the mass force is k1 = 0, and also ∂p/∂x1 = 0, as the ﬂow is caused by the movement of the upper plate and not because of a pressure diﬀerence. The momentum equation is reduced to 0=η

∂ 2 w1 , ∂x2 2

and therefore

w1 =

x2 wL . L

Likewise, in the energy equation (3.95), all the terms on the left hand side disappear because ∂/∂t = 0, ∂ϑ/∂x1 = 0, w2 = 0. This then becomes λ

∂2ϑ +φ = ∂x2 2

with φ = η

∂w1 ∂x2

2 =η

w 2 L

L

.

310

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Integration of the energy equation yields a parabolic temperature proﬁle in x2 η wL 2 2 ϑ(x2 ) = − x2 + a1 x2 + a0 . 2λ L The constants a0 and a1 follow out of the boundary conditions ϑ(x2 = 0) = ϑ0

and

ϑ(x2 = L) = ϑL .

With this the temperature proﬁle is found to be

η wL2 x2 x2 2 x2 ϑ = ϑ0 + − + (ϑL − ϑ0 ) . 2λ L L L The pattern of the temperature proﬁle over x2 is shown on the right in Fig. 3.11. If the upper plate does not move, wL = 0, the temperature proﬁle is the same as that for pure heat conduction between two ﬂat plates. For suﬃciently large values of wL the temperature proﬁle has a maximum, the position of which is calculated from dϑ/dx2 = 0 to be

λ 1 (x2 )max = (ϑL − ϑ0 ) + L . 2 η wL 2 It has to be that (x2 )max ≤ L. This criterium is met, if

wL ≥

1/2 2λ (ϑL − ϑ0 ) = wL∗ . η

At velocities less than wL∗ very little energy will be dissipated, the maximum temperature will coincide with the temperature of the upper plate. At velocities greater than wL∗ , so much energy will be dissipated that at a certain region between the plates the ﬂuid will be heated to a temperature above that of the upper plate.

3.3

Inﬂuence of the Reynolds number on the ﬂow

A general solution of the Navier-Stokes equations has not been possible until now. The main cause of these diﬃculties is the non-linear character of the diﬀerential equations by the product of the inertia terms

dwj ∂wj ∂wj = + wi dt ∂t ∂xi

on the left hand side of the Navier-Stokes equation. Solutions are only known for certain special cases. These are yielded because it is possible to determine under what conditions individual terms in the equation can be neglected compared to others, thereby allowing the equation to be simpliﬁed to some degree. In order to assess the magnitude of individual terms, the diﬀerential equation is sensibly rearranged so that it contains dimensionless quantities. This means that the magnitude of the terms is then independent of the measurement system chosen. This

3.3 Inﬂuence of the Reynolds number on the ﬂow

311

type of presentation of the equation by dimensionless groups is always possible, and is an expression of the general principle that the description and solution of a physical problem have to be independent of the measurement system. The use of problem orientated standard measures of the quantities is equivalent to the introduction of dimensionless groups. We will consider here the Navier-Stokes equation for incompressible ﬂow (3.94) without body forces

∂wj dwj ∂p ∂ 2wj ∂wj =− +η . = + wi dt ∂t ∂xi ∂xj ∂xi 2

(3.98)

All velocities are divided by a reference velocity wα given for the problem, for example the upstream velocity of a body in crossﬂow. In the same way all lengths are divided by a reference length L given for the problem, an example of this is the length over which the ﬂuid ﬂows across a body. With this we can then form dimensionless quantities wi+ = wi /wα

,

x+ i = xi /L ,

p+ = p/ wα2 t+ = t wα /L

and then introduce them into the Navier-Stokes equation (3.98). The viscosity η will be replaced by the kinematic viscosity ν according to η = ν . This then gives + ∂wj+ ∂wj+ ∂p+ 1 ∂ 2 wj + + w = − + i 2 ∂t+ Re ∂x+ ∂x+ ∂x+ i j i

(3.99)

with the already well known Reynolds number Re =

wα L . ν

In addition we have the dimensionless form of the continuity equation for incompressible ﬂow ∂wi+ =0 , (3.100) ∂x+ i which emerges from (3.93) after the introduction of the dimensionless groups together with the boundary conditions, (3.99) and (3.100) completely describe the ﬂow. As a solution we obtain the velocity ﬁeld wj+ (t+ , x+ i ) and the pressure ﬁeld p+ (t+ , x+ ). i Obviously the solution still depends on the Reynolds number. This can be interpreted as the ratio of the inertia to friction forces. The inertia force dw1 /dt is of magnitude wα /t, in which the time t is of magnitude L/wα and therefore, the inertia force is of magnitude wα2 /L The friction force η ∂ 2 w1 /∂x21 is of magnitude ηwα /L2 .

312

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

The ratio of the two terms is of the magnitude of wα L wα L wα2 /L = = = Re ηwα /L2 η ν and will just be described by the Reynolds number Re. As we can see the inertia forces increase with the square of the velocity. They increase far more rapidly with the velocity than the friction forces which are only linearly dependent on the velocity. At large Reynolds numbers the disturbances to the velocity that are always present cannot be dampened by the comparatively small friction forces. This manifests itself in the fact that ﬂows at a certain Reynolds number, the so-called critical Reynolds number, change their pattern. Whilst below the critical Reynolds number the ﬂuid particles move along distinct stream lines and disturbances in the velocity rapidly disappear again, above this critical Reynolds number disturbances in the velocity are no longer dampened but intensiﬁed. This type of ﬂow is called turbulent. The ﬂow along distinct streamlines is known as laminar. Turbulent ﬂow is always three-dimensional, unsteady and exhibits an irregular vortex pattern. The velocity at a ﬁxed point ﬂuctuates irregularly around a mean value. The momentary values of velocity, pressure, temperature and concentration are random quantities. Solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations for laminar ﬂows at large Reynolds numbers only describe real ﬂows if the solutions are stable against small disturbances. A momentarily small disturbance has to disappear again. This is no longer the case above the critical Reynolds number. A momentarily small disturbance does not disappear, rather it grows. The ﬂow form changes from laminar to turbulent ﬂow. These occurences were ﬁrst observed by Osborne Reynolds (1842–1912), when he added a dye to the ﬂow along the axis of a glass tube. In laminar ﬂow a thin thread of colour forms in the axis of the tube, which, due to the low rate of molecular diﬀusion, hardly gets wider. Increasing the velocity so that the critical Reynolds number is suﬃciently surpassed, means that the thread is rapidly mixed up into the ﬂow. In tube ﬂow it can be shown that at Reynolds numbers Recrit = wm d/ν ≤ 2300 , formed with the velocity wm averaged over the cross section and the tube diameter d, even in highly disturbed inlet ﬂow, the ﬂow always remains laminar. With a ﬂow that is especially free of disturbances critical Reynolds numbers have been measured up to 40 000. However because in most technical applications it is impossible to have a ﬂow completely free of disturbances, ﬂow is only laminar below Recrit = 2 300. At Reynolds numbers up to about 2 600 the ﬂow has an intermittent character. It varies periodically with time, partly laminar, partly turbulent. Above Re = 2 600 ﬂow is completely turbulent. In transverse ﬂow along a ﬂat plate the transition from laminar to turbulent ﬂow occurs at Reynolds numbers wα L/ν between 3 · 105 and 5 · 105 ; wα is the

3.4 Simpliﬁcations to the Navier-Stokes equations

313

initial ﬂow velocity, L is the length of the plate over which the ﬂuid is ﬂowing. The heat and mass transfer in turbulent ﬂows is more intensive than in laminar. In general, at the same time there is also an increase in the pressure drop.

3.4

Simpliﬁcations to the Navier-Stokes equations

Simpliﬁcations to the Navier-Stokes equations are produced when the Reynolds number is very small or very large, Re → 0 or Re → ∞. These limiting cases are never reached in reality but they represent asymptotic solutions and are better approximations the larger or smaller the Reynolds number is. We will investigate these limiting cases in the following.

3.4.1

Creeping ﬂows

The limiting case Re → 0 is known as creeping ﬂow. It can be realised if the velocity wα is very small, the density is very low, for example in very dilute gases, and the viscosity η is very large, i.e. in highly viscous ﬂuids, or if the typical body dimension L is very small as in ﬂow around dust particles or fog droplets. The viscous forces are far greater than the inertia forces, so the left hand side of (3.99) is negligible in comparison to the term (1/Re)(∂ 2 wj+ /∂x+2 i ). In contrast to this the pressure gradient ∂p+/∂x+ cannot be neglected, it is of j magnitude Δp Δp/L , = wα2 wα2 /L and contains the inertia forces as the small quantity in the denominator. The pressure term can only be neglected if the pressure drop is signiﬁcantly smaller than the inertia forces. We can decide whether this applies, by ﬁrst solving the momentum and continuity equation. By neglecting the inertia forces in (3.99) the non-linear terms drop out, and after transforming the equation back into dimensioned quantities we are left with the linear diﬀerential equation ∂p ∂ 2wj =η . ∂xj ∂xi 2 A further diﬀerentiation provides ∂ 2p ∂ ∂ 2wj ∂2 = η = η ∂xj 2 ∂xj ∂xi 2 ∂xi 2

(3.101)

∂wj ∂xj

=0 .

(3.102)

As the ﬂow was presumed to be incompressible, as a result of the continuity equation, ∂wj /∂xj = 0 holds. The pressure satisﬁes the potential equation. Equations

314

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

(3.101) and (3.102) are the basis of the hydrodynamic theory of lubrication, which encompasses, among others, the oil ﬂow in bearings.

3.4.2

Frictionless ﬂows

If we presume that the ﬂow is completely free of friction η = 0, then 1/Re = 0. The friction term on the right hand side of (3.99) disappears and after transformation to dimensioned quantities, we obtain

∂wj ∂p ∂wj =− . + wi ∂t ∂xi ∂xj

(3.103)

This is Euler’s equation. It contains, in the special case of one-dimensional steadystate ﬂow, the relationship dw1 dp w1 =− dx1 dx1 which when integrated w2 1 + p = const 2 is known as Bernoulli’s equation. The inﬂuence of gravity here is neglected. Whilst the Navier-Stokes equation (3.98) is of second order, Euler’s equation (3.103) only contains ﬁrst order terms. As its order is one lower than the NavierStokes equation, after integration one less boundary condition can be satisﬁed. As a result of this, the no-slip condition, zero velocity at the wall, cannot be satisﬁed. Rather a ﬁnite velocity at the wall is obtained, as the absence of friction was presumed, whilst in real ﬂows the velocity is zero at the wall.

3.4.3

Boundary layer ﬂows

As we have seen in the previous sections, the friction term in the Navier-Stokes equation (3.98) may not be neglected for large Reynolds numbers Re → ∞, if we wish to correctly describe the ﬂow close to the wall, and satisfy the no-slip condition. The region in which the friction forces may not be neglected compared to the inertia forces is generally bounded by a very thin zone close to the wall, as the velocity increases and therefore also the shear stress is very large, as is clearly illustrated in Fig. 3.12. The shear stress τ21 = η

∂w1 ∂x2

is especially large close to the wall. In contrast to this it is negligible a large distance away from the wall. The layer close to the wall, in which the inertia and

3.5 The boundary layer equations

315

Fig. 3.12: Velocities in a boundary layer

friction forces are of the same magnitude, is called the velocity boundary layer or simply the boundary layer. The calculation of the momentum, heat and mass transfer in these types of ﬂows is the object of boundary layer theory and will be dealt with in the following section. The thickness of the boundary layer δ(x1 ) will merely be guessed at here. This will only involve consideration of the inertia and friction force acting in the direction of the x1 -axis. The characteristic inertia term is of the magnitude wα2 /x1 , if we replace the characteristic length by the distance from the leading edge. In the x1 -direction, the following friction terms appear in (3.98) for the ﬂow being considered here, which has a velocity w1 (x1 , x2 ) ∂ 2w1 ∂ 2 w1 ∂ 2 w1 =η +η . 2 2 ∂xi ∂x1 ∂x2 2 Whilst the ﬁrst term on the right hand side is of magnitude ηwα /x21 , the order of magnitude of the second term is ηwα /δ 2 . As the boundary layer is a great deal thinner when compared to the plate length, at a suﬃcient distance from the front of the plate, δ x1 , the second term for the friction inside the boundary layer is decisive. Equating the orders of magnitude of the inertia and friction forces yields wα2 ηwα ≈ 2 x1 δ or δ ≈ x1 / Rex1 (3.104) √ with Rex1 = wα x1 /ν. The boundary layer increases with x1. It is thinner the higher the Reynolds number. Within the narrow region of the boundary layer the friction forces can clearly not be neglected, whilst outside the boundary layer they have little signiﬁcance, so that Euler’s equation holds for the external region. η

3.5 3.5.1

The boundary layer equations The velocity boundary layer

At large Reynolds numbers, as has already been discussed, the ﬂow area can be split into two regions, the outer, frictionless ﬂow which is described by Euler’s

316

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

equation, and the ﬂow inside the boundary layer, which is characterised by the fact that the friction forces are no longer negligible when compared to the inertia forces. From Euler’s equation, for a particular pressure ﬁeld, we obtain a velocity proﬁle in the outer space. However we are still not in a position to investigate the resistances to ﬂow. To do this we also need to know the velocity proﬁle in the boundary layer. Inside the boundary layer the velocity proﬁle changes from a value of zero at the wall to the asymptotic value of the velocity in the outer, frictionless region. In the same way the values for the temperature and concentration change from the values at the wall to the asymptotic values of the outer region. In the following we will assume the velocities, temperatures and concentrations in the outer region to be known, and consider a steady-state, two-dimensional ﬂow. The body forces are negligible. Flow along a curved wall can be taken to be twodimensional as long as the radius of curvature of the wall is much bigger compared to the thickness of the boundary layer. The curvature is then insigniﬁcant for the thin boundary layer, and it develops just as if it was on a ﬂat wall. The curvature of the wall is merely of inﬂuence on the outer ﬂow and its pressure distribution. We will introduce so-called boundary layer coordinates, Fig. 3.13, in which the coordinate x1 = x is chosen to be along the surface of the body and x2 = y as perpendicular to it. We will presume an initial velocity wα (y); its integral mean value will be wm . Density changes in ﬂowing liquids are very small, if we disregard the extreme cases, for example density changes caused by the very fast opening and closing of valves in piping systems. So, in general, for ﬂowing liquids, d /dt → 0 holds, and we can apply the continuity and momentum equations for incompressible ﬂow. The density changes in gases are also small, if the velocities ar so low that the Mach number formed with the velocity of sound is Ma = wm /wS 1. We will illustrate this for the example of a reversible, adiabatic ﬂow. It follows from the equation of state p = p( , s) that dp = The derivative here is

∂p ∂

∂p ∂

d . s

:= wS2 s

Fig. 3.13: Boundary layer in transverse ﬂow along a body

3.5 The boundary layer equations

317

where wS is the velocity of sound. So, for a reversible, adiabatic ﬂow, it holds that dp = wS2 d . As no technical work is executed, we have dwt = 0 = v dp + d

w2 2

,

when we neglect changes in the potential energy. With that it follows that v dp = vwS2 d = wS2 d / and d 1 1 = 2 v dp = − 2 d wS wS or

w2 2

=−

w dw wS2

dw d = −Ma 2 . w

dw/w ≤ 1 is valid for the relative velocity change. The relative density variation d / is small for Ma < 1, e.g. for Ma = 0.3, which corresponds to a velocity of 100 m/s of air at ambient state, we obtain d ≤ 0.09 . Therefore, gases at moderate velocities, without large changes in their temperature, may be assumed to be incompressible, d /dt → 0, and their ﬂow can be approximately described by the continuity and momentum equations for incompressible ﬂow. Under these presumptions, the continuity and Navier-Stokes equations (3.93) and (3.94), with w1 = wx and w2 = wy , i.e. leaving the tensor system out, may be written as ∂wx ∂wy + =0 (3.105) ∂x ∂y 2 ∂p ∂ wx ∂ 2 wx ∂wx ∂wx + wy =− +η (3.106) + wx ∂x ∂y ∂x ∂x2 ∂y2 2 ∂wy ∂wy ∂p ∂ wy ∂ 2 wy . (3.107) wx + + wy =− +η ∂y ∂y ∂y ∂x2 ∂y2 In order to estimate the order of magnitude of the individual terms in these equations, dimensionless quantities are introduced. It is useful to measure the distance y from the wall relative to a “mean boundary layer thickness” δm ∼ L/Re1/2

318

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

with Re = wm L/ν, whilst the length L is chosen as the length scale for the ﬂow direction x, and the velocity wx is divided by the mean velocity wm in the initial ﬂow direction. Out of the continuity equation follows wy ∼

wm δm L

and therefore wy ∼ wm /Re1/2 . As a standard for the velocity wy , wm /Re1/2 is introduced. In this manner the following dimensionless quantities are yielded: wx + =

wx , wm

wy + =

wy 1/2 Re , wm

x+ =

x , L

y+ =

y y = Re1/2 , δm L

p+ =

p . 2 wm

With these quantities (3.105) to (3.107) assume the following forms: ∂wx+ ∂wy+ + =0 , ∂x+ ∂y + + ∂p+ 1 ∂ 2 wx+ ∂ 2 wx+ ∂wx+ + ∂wx + w = − + + , y ∂x+ ∂y + ∂x+ Re ∂x+ 2 ∂y + 2 ∂wy+ ∂wy+ 1 ∂p+ 1 ∂ 2wy+ 1 ∂ 2 wy+ + + wx = − + w + + . y 2 Re ∂x+ ∂y+ ∂y + Re2 ∂x+ Re ∂y + 2 For large Reynolds numbers Re → ∞ all terms with the factor 1/Re and even more those with 1/Re2 will be vanishingly small. After neglecting these terms and returning to equations with dimensions, we obtain the boundary layer equations, which were ﬁrst given in this form by L. Prandtl (1875–1953) [3.4] in 1904:

wx+

∂wx ∂wy + =0 , ∂x ∂y

(3.108)

∂wx ∂wx ∂p ∂ 2 wx , (3.109) + wy =− +η ∂x ∂y ∂x ∂y2 ∂p =0 . (3.110) ∂y The two unknown velocities wx and wy are obtained from (3.108) and (3.109). The pressure is no longer an unknown, as according to (3.110) the pressure p = p(x) is not a function of the coordinate y normal to the wall. It is determined by the outer ﬂow region, that is the shape of the body around which the ﬂuid is ﬂowing or the channel through which the ﬂuid ﬂows. The pressure has the same value in the boundary layer for any position x as in the outer ﬂow region and can, with the assistance of Euler’s equation (3.103), be replaced by the velocity wδ (x) of the outer ﬂow region: ∂wδ dp wδ =− . (3.111) ∂x dx wx

3.5 The boundary layer equations

319

The following boundary conditions are available for the solution of this system of equations: The zero velocity condition at the wall y=0:

wx = wy = 0 ,

(3.112)

the condition at the outer edge of the boundary layer, according to which the velocity wy changes asymptotically to that of the outer ﬂow region, y→∞:

wx = wδ

(3.113)

and the initial condition is x=0:

wx = wα (y) .

(3.114)

The boundary layer equations are non-linear and with the exception of a few special cases, cannot be solved analytically.

3.5.2

The thermal boundary layer

In a similar way to the simpliﬁcation of the Navier-Stokes equation for the calculations in the velocity boundary layer, the energy equation can also be simpliﬁed to allow calculation of the temperatures in the thermal boundary layer. To explain this further we we once again consider a body, as in Fig. 3.12, whose surface has a certain wall temperature ϑ0 , which is diﬀerent from the ﬂuid temperature ϑα at the leading edge. As before we have presumed steady-state, two-dimensional ﬂow. Large temperature and pressure changes are to be excluded, so that we can assume constant thermal conductivity. Liquids are, as already mentioned, on the whole incompressible, d /dt = 0, whilst for gases, the contribution to the energy balance from the density changes, even if they are small, still has to be estimated. Therefore we will use the temperature form (3.85) of the energy equation, which is valid for both incompressible and compressible ﬂow 2 ∂ϑ ∂ϑ dp ∂ ϑ ∂ 2ϑ T ∂v + 2 + cp wx =λ + wy +φ (3.115) 2 ∂x ∂y ∂x ∂y v ∂ϑ p dt and estimate the magnitude of the individual terms as before, in which we will use some of the dimensionless quantities that have already been deﬁned: wx wy x p wx+ = ; wy+ = Re1/2 ; x+ = ; p+ = . 2 wm wm L wm As a standard for the y coordinate the mean thickness of the thermal boundary layer is introduced. An approximation of the thermal boundary layer has already been given in (3.8) 1/2 a δT ∼ x wm x

320

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

where wm was presumed to be a constant velocity. The thermal diﬀusivity is deﬁned here by a := λ/ cp . The mean thickness δT m of the thermal boundary layer 1/2 a , δT m ∼ L wm L is determined by this equation, except for the still unknown proportionality factor. The quantity which exists here wm L a is the already well known P´eclet number P e. It is linked with the Reynolds number by wm L wm L ν Pe = = = Re P r . a ν a P r = ν/a is the Prandtl number. With δT m we form the dimensionless coordinate y+ =

y y = P e1/2 . δT m L

In addition a dimensionless time is introduced t+ =

t wm L

and as the dimensionless temperature we have ϑ+ =

ϑ − ϑ0 . ϑα − ϑ0

By this normalisation the temperature in the thermal boundary layer varies between the values 0 ≤ ϑ+ ≤ 1. With these dimensionless quantities the energy equation (3.115) can be rearranged into wx+

1 ∂ 2 ϑ+ ∂ 2 ϑ+ ∂ϑ+ ∂ϑ+ + P r1/2 wy+ + = + + ∂x ∂y P e ∂x+ 2 ∂y + 2 w2 T ∂v φL dp+ + m + (3.116) cp Δϑ v ∂ϑ p dt+ wm cpΔϑ

with Δϑ = ϑα − ϑ0. The viscous dissipation φ which appears in this is of the magnitude (see also Example 3.3) 2 w2 ∂wx ∼ η 2m or with δm ∼ L/Re1/2 φ∼η ∂y δm φ∼η

2 2 3 wm L wm wm wm Re = η = . 2 2 L L η L

3.5 The boundary layer equations

321

With that the magnitude of the last term in (3.116) is 2 wm φL ∼ . wm cp Δϑ cpΔϑ

The quantity 2 wm = Ec cp Δϑ

is the already well known Eckert number. It is the ratio of the average kinetic energy to the average internal energy in the boundary layer. In heat and mass transfer problems it is very small, except when the ﬂow is at high velocity or above the velocity of sound. These types of ﬂows were however discounted here. This means that the contribution of the viscous dissipation to the energy equation can be neglected. In the penultimate expression of (3.116) 2 wm T ∂v dp+ dp+ T ∂v = Ec cpΔϑ v ∂ϑ p dt+ v ∂ϑ p dt+ for ideal gases we have T v

∂v ∂ϑ

=1 , p

whilst for liquids, because v = v0 = const the expression disappears. As the Eckert number Ec is very small, the penultimate expression can also be neglected for gases. We have presumed large Reynolds numbers Re → ∞, and the Prandtl number is of order 1, and so the ﬁrst term on the left hand side of (3.116) can also be neglected. The heat conduction in the direction of ﬂow x is negligible in comparison with that through the thin boundary layer. After transforming this all back into dimensioned coordinates we get the following equation for the thermal boundary layer ∂ϑ ∂ϑ ∂ 2ϑ cp wx (3.117) + cp wy =λ 2 . ∂x ∂y ∂y Corresponding considerations are also valid for the thermal boundary layer in multicomponent mixtures. The energy transport through conduction and diﬀusion in the direction of the transverse coordinate x is negligible in comparison to that through the boundary layer. The energy equation for the boundary layer follows from (3.97), in which we will presuppose vanishing mass forces kKi : cp wx

N −1 ∂2ϑ ∗ ∂ ∂h ∂ϑ ∂ϑ − jKy hK Γ˙ K . + cp wy =λ 2 − ∂x ∂y ∂y ∂y ∂ξK K=1 K

(3.118)

Equation (3.118) also holds in this form for multicomponent mixtures consisting of more than two components. For a binary mixture of components A and B, the enthalpy of the mixture is h = h0A ξA + h0B (1 − ξA ) + Δh ,

322

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

when Δh is the mixing enthalpy and h0A , h0B are the enthalpies of the pure substances A and B. The enthalpy of mixing can be neglected for gases far away from the critical state, and by deﬁnition it disappears for ideal liquid mixtures. Then ∂h = h0A − h0B . ∂ξA Furthermore for an incompressible pure ﬂuid, due to v = v0 =const dh = cp dϑ + v0 dp and

∂h ∂ϑ = cp ∂y ∂y

as ∂p/∂y = 0 in the boundary layer. With this we obtain ∂ ∂h ∂ϑ = (cpA − cpB ) ∂y ∂ξA ∂y where cpA and cpB are the speciﬁc heat capacities of the pure substances A and B. The energy equation of the boundary layer of an incompressible binary mixture then reads cp wx

∂ϑ ∂ϑ ∂2ϑ ∂ϑ ∗ + cp wy = λ 2 − jAy (cpA − cpB ) − (hA − hB ) Γ˙ A ∂x ∂y ∂y ∂y

with ∗ jAy = −D

(3.119)

∂ξA . ∂y

If both the substances have the same speciﬁc heat capacities, the term for mass transfer drops out of the equation. However in all other cases it does not assume a negligible value. In particular for substances such as water vapour and air, the speciﬁc heat capacities are so diﬀerent that the mass transfer term cannot be removed. In addition it should be recognised that the energy equation agrees with that for pure substances when the speciﬁc heat capacities of the two components are equal and when no chemical reactions occur. Example 3.6: In the energy equation (3.119) for a binary mixture consisting of water vapour and air at 100 ◦ C estimate the magnitude of the individual terms. Chemical reactions are excluded. The speciﬁc heat capacity of the water vapour is cpA = 1.996 kJ/kgK, and that of the air cpB = 1.011 kJ/kgK. In addition the Lewis number is Le = a/D = 1. Introducing the dimensionless quantities which will be used for the derivation of the energy equation for the boundary layer for pure substances, gives wx+ =

wx ; wm

ϑ+ =

wy+ =

ϑ − ϑ0 ϑα − ϑ0

wy Re1/2 ; wm

x+ =

and additionally

x ; L

y+ =

y P e1/2 ; L

+ ξA =

ξA − ξA0 . ξAα − ξA0

With that, (3.119) is transformed into wx+

∂ξ + ∂ϑ+ ∂ϑ+ ∂ϑ+ ∂ 2 ϑ+ (ξAα − ξA0 ) D (cpA − cpB ) L + P r 1/2 wy+ + = + Pe A . 2 + 2 + ∂x ∂y wm c p L ∂y + ∂y + ∂y

Due to the fact that P e = wm L/a we can then write for this wx+

+ ∂ϑ+ ∂ϑ+ ∂ 2 ϑ+ (ξAα − ξA0 ) (cpA − cpB ) D ∂ξA ∂ϑ+ + P r 1/2 wy+ + = . 2 + + ∂y + + ∂x+ ∂y c a ∂y ∂y p

3.5 The boundary layer equations

323

The magnitude of the last term is determined by its coeﬃcient. This is yielded by setting for cp , a mean value (cpA + cpB )/2 = 1.5035 kJ/kgK and putting ξAα − ξA0 = 1, that means that we assume the mass fraction of water vapour to be low ξAα = 0 in the core ﬂow, and large ξA0 = 1 at the wall, because this is where the water vapour condenses. With a/D = 1 the magnitude of the coeﬃcient is 0.655. As all the other expressions are of order 1 the mass transfer term cannot be neglected. This would only be possible if ξAα − ξA0 was very small and of the order 10−2 .

3.5.3

The concentration boundary layer

The same reasoning as before, whereby the mass transfer in the direction of ﬂow is negligible in comparison to that through the boundary layer, leads to the equations for the concentration boundary layer. These are found from the component continuity equations (3.25) by neglecting the relevant expressions, to be wx

∗ ∂jAy ∂ξA ∂ξA + wy =− + Γ˙ A , ∂x ∂y ∂y

(3.120)

∗ with jAy = − D ∂ξA /∂y for a binary mixture.

3.5.4

General comments on the solution of boundary layer equations

The equations (3.109), (3.117) or (3.118) and (3.120) for the velocity, thermal and concentration boundary layers show some noticeable similarities. On the left hand side they contain “convective terms”, which describe the momentum, heat or mass exchange by convection, whilst on the right hand side a “diﬀusive term” for the momentum, heat and mass exchange exists. In addition to this the energy equation for multicomponent mixtures (3.118) and the component continuity equation (3.25) also contain terms for the inﬂuence of chemical reactions. The remaining expressions for pressure drop in the momentum equation and mass transport in the energy equation for multicomponent mixtures cannot be compared with each other because they describe two completely diﬀerent physical phenomena. The equations are the basis for many technical applications. However, before we investigate particular solutions, it would be sensible to make some general remarks on the solution of these equations. To this eﬀect, the equations will once again be brought into a dimensionless form. As we are only interested in discussing the characteristic features of the solution, and not as in the derivation of the boundary layer equations, where an estimation of the magnitude of the individual terms in a particular equation was required, all the quantities in the equations will be made dimensionless in the

324

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

same way. We will now introduce the following dimensionless quantities x+ =

x ; L

y+ =

y ; L

wx+ =

wx ; wm

wy+ =

wy ; wm

ϑ − ϑ0 ξA − ξA0 p ; ξA+ = ; p+ = . 2 ϑα − ϑ 0 ξAα − ξA0 wm Chemical reactions will not play any role in this discussion. The considerations here will be restricted to pure substances or binary mixtures which have components of approximately the same speciﬁc heat capacity. The energy equation (3.119) then agrees with that for pure substances (3.117). After introduction of the dimensionless quantities the continuity equation is ϑ+ =

∂wx+ ∂wy+ + =0 , ∂x+ ∂y +

(3.121)

whilst the momentum equation becomes wx+

∂p+ 1 ∂ 2wx+ ∂wx+ ∂wx+ + wy+ =− + + , + + ∂x ∂y ∂x Re ∂y+ 2

(3.122)

the energy equation reads wx+

∂ϑ+ ∂ϑ+ 1 ∂ 2 ϑ+ + wy+ + = + ∂x ∂y ReP r ∂y+ 2

(3.123)

and the continuity equation for component A is wx+

+ 1 ∂ 2ξA+ ∂ξA+ + ∂ξA + w = y ∂x+ ∂y+ ReSc ∂y+ 2

(3.124)

with the Reynolds number Re = wm L/ν, the Prandtl number P r = ν/a and the Schmidt number Sc = ν/D. As solutions to the continuity and momentum equations, for a given ﬂow and thereby a given pressure drop ∂p+/∂x+ , we obtain wx+ = f (x+ , y + , Re) and wy+ = f (x+ , y + , Re) . Out of this the shear stress at the wall is found to be + ∂wx ∂wx wm =η τ0 = η ∂y y=0 ∂y+ y + =0 L and the friction factor cf =

τ0 2 = 2 /2 wm Re

∂wx+ ∂y+

= y + =0

2 f (x+ , Re) . Re

(3.125)

For a given shape of the body, the friction factor only depends on the coordinate x+ and the Reynolds number, not on the type of ﬂuid.

3.5 The boundary layer equations

325

The solution to the energy equation is of the form ϑ+ = f (x+ , y + , Re, P r) . This yields the heat ﬂux transferred to be + ∂ϑ ∂ϑ ϑα − ϑ 0 q˙ = −λ = −λ . ∂y y=0 ∂y + y + =0 L On the other hand the heat transfer coeﬃcient is deﬁned by q˙ = α(ϑ0 − ϑα ) . Setting these expressions equal to each other gives + αL ∂ϑ = f (x+ , Re, P r) . = Nu = λ ∂y+ y+ =0

(3.126)

The Nusselt number is equal to the dimensionless temperature gradient at the wall. It is a universal function of x+ , Re and P r for every ﬂuid with a body of a given shape. The mean Nusselt number is independent of x+ , as it is the integral mean value over the heat transfer surface αm L N um = = f (Re, P r) . (3.127) λ Taking into consideration the velocity ﬁeld wx+ (x+ , Re) and wy+ (y + , Re), we obtain, from the component continuity equation (3.124), as a general solution ξA+ = f (x+ , y + , Re, Sc) . The mass ﬂux transferred is + ξAα − ξA0 ∂ξA ∂ξA ∗ jA = − D . = − D + ∂y y=0 ∂y y + =0 L For a vanishing convective ﬂow across the boundary layer the mass transfer coefﬁcient is deﬁned by jA∗ = β (ξA0 − ξAα ) . It follows from the two equations that + βL ∂ξA = f (x+ , Re, Sc) . = Sh = D ∂y + y+ =0

(3.128)

The Sherwood number is equal to the dimensionless gradient of the concentration proﬁle at the wall. It is a universal function of x+ , Re and Sc independent of the type of ﬂuid for a body of a certain shape. The mean Sherwood number, as the integral mean value over the mass transfer surface, is independent of x+ : Shm =

βm L = f (Re, Sc) . D

(3.129)

326

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

As soon as the functional relationships between the Nusselt, Reynolds and Prandtl numbers or the Sherwood, Reynolds and Schmidt numbers have been found, be it by measurement or calculation, the heat and mass transfer laws worked out from this hold for all ﬂuids, velocities and length scales. It is also valid for all geometrically similar bodies. This is presuming that the assumptions which lead to the boundary layer equations apply, namely negligible viscous dissipation and body forces and no chemical reactions. As the diﬀerential equations (3.123) and (3.124) basically agree with each other, the solutions must also be in agreement, presuming that the boundary conditions are of the same kind. The functions (3.126) and (3.128) as well as (3.127) and (3.129) are therefore of the same type. So, it holds that Shm f (Re, Sc) = . N um f (Re, P r) As already explained, section 1.5, these types of function can frequently be approximated by power products over a wide range of states N um = c Ren P rm

and Shm = c Ren Scm .

Out of this follows Shm λ βm = = N um αm D

Sc Pr

m =

a m D

or

D a m 1 βm = = Lem−1 αm λ D cp the well known Lewis relationship, see also (1.198), with the Lewis number Le = a/D, from which the mass transfer coeﬃcient βm can be calculated, if the heat transfer coeﬃcient is known. A good approximation is m = 1/3. The equations (3.123) and (3.124) agree for P r = Sc = 1, as well as with the momentum equation (3.122), if we presuppose vanishing pressure drop. Under the assumption of the same boundary conditions, the velocity proﬁle agrees with the temperature and the concentration proﬁle. Therefore + + + ∂wx τ0 ∂ϑ ∂ξA = = = N u = = Sh + + ∂y ηwm ∂y y+ =0 ∂y + y+ =0 y + =0 2 /2) and the Reynolds or after introduction of the friction factor cf = τ0 /( wm number Re = wm L/ν

Sh cf Nu = = for P r = Sc = 1 . (3.130) Re Re 2 In this the Nusselt number N u = αL/λ and the Sherwood number Sh = βL/D are formed with the local heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients. The ratio N u/Re and Sh/Re is independent of the characteristic length as this is also contained in the Reynolds number Re = wm L/ν. The equation (3.130) is known as the Reynolds analogy. The heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients can be calculated with this as long as the friction factor is known.

3.6 Inﬂuence of turbulence on heat and mass transfer

3.6

327

Inﬂuence of turbulence on heat and mass transfer

A turbulent ﬂow is characterised by velocity ﬂuctuations which overlap the main ﬂow. The disturbed ﬂow is basically three-dimensional and unsteady. At sufﬁciently high Reynolds numbers, the boundary layer is also no longer laminar but turbulent, such that the velocities, temperatures and concentrations all vary locally at a ﬁxed position, as Fig. 3.14 shows for a velocity component wi . At every position it can be formed as the sum of a time-mean value (T here is the integration time) T 1 w¯i = lim wi (xj , t) dt = w¯i (xj ) (3.131) T →∞ T 0

and a ﬂuctuating component

wi : wi = w¯i + wi .

Fig. 3.14 shows a ﬂow with a statistically steady time-mean velocity because the velocity at a ﬁxed point is independent of time after a suﬃciently long time has passed. It is obtained by the formation of a mean value as deﬁned in (3.131). A ﬂow can also be unsteady with respect to its time-mean velocity, for example if a ﬂuid ﬂows through a pulsating plastic duct. Then w ¯i (xj , t), and the centre line in Fig. 3.14 would still change with time.

Fig. 3.14: Velocity ﬂuctuations at a ﬁxed position in a statistically steady ﬂow

Only ﬂows steady with respect to the time-mean properties will be considered here. The time-mean value of the ﬂuctuation velocity is, by deﬁnition, equal to zero, w¯i = 0. Correspondingly, pressure, temperature and concentration can also be split into mean and ﬂuctuating values p = p¯ + p ,

ϑ = ϑ¯ + ϑ ,

ξA = ξ¯A + ξA .

Incompressible ﬂow will be presumed, so the splitting of the density into these two values is not required. Measurements have shown that ﬂuid particles of diﬀerent sizes cause turbulent ﬂuctuations and that they simultaneously rotate on their axes. This produces a spectrum of eddies of diﬀerent size and frequency. The smallest eddies are

328

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

of a magnitude from 0.1 to 1 mm, still far greater than the mean free path of molecules, 10−14 mm. The eddy consists of a suﬃciently large number of molecules, such that the balance equations are still valid. Velocity, pressure, temperature and concentration are momentary values at each point and can be found using numerical methods from the equations for three-dimensional transient ﬂow. In order to carry this out, the time step is chosen to be exceptionally small due to the high frequency of the turbulent ﬂuctuations of 104 s−1 to 1 s−1 . Even with the most powerful computers now available this would lead to a calculation time that cannot be accomplished. Anyway in heat and mass transfer the interest does not lie in the ﬂuctuations with time, rather the mean values. However these are also not particularly easy to determine because of the non-linearity of the convective terms in the balance equations, ﬂuctuations in the velocity, temperature and concentration also have an inﬂuence on the mean values. The balance equations formed with these terms contain additional expressions which are not yielded from the equations themselves. Phenomenological statements or statistical turbulence models have to be developed for this. In order to show this, we will consider a boundary layer ﬂow. Chemical reactions are excluded from this discussion. In addition we will only consider pure substances or binary mixtures with components that have approximately the same speciﬁc heat capacity, so that the energy equation agrees with that for pure substances. Splitting the velocity into a mean value and a ﬂuctuation velocity, wi = w¯i +wi , in the continuity equation (3.93) leads to ∂ ∂w ¯i ∂wi (w¯i + wi ) = + =0 . ∂xi ∂xi ∂xi After averaging this over time remains ∂w ¯i =0 . ∂xi

(3.132)

The convective term in the momentum equation (3.94) can, under consideration of the continuity equation ∂wi /∂xi = 0, also be written as wi

∂ ∂wj = (wi wj ) . ∂xi ∂xi

From which we get ∂ ∂ w¯i w [(w¯i + wi )(w¯j + wj )] = ¯j + w¯i wj + w¯i w¯j + wi wj . ∂xi ∂xi After time averaging, all the terms linear in wj and wi disappear, and with (3.132), this leaves ∂wj ∂w ¯j ∂ wi = w¯i + (w w ) . ∂xi ∂xi ∂xi i j Correspondingly, for the convective term in the energy equation (3.95), we obtain wi

∂ϑ ∂ ϑ¯ ∂ = w¯i + (w ϑ ) ∂xi ∂xi ∂xi i

3.6 Inﬂuence of turbulence on heat and mass transfer

329

and for the convective term in the component continuity equation wi

∂ ∂ξA ∂ ξ¯A = w¯i + (w ϑ ) . ∂xi ∂xi ∂xi i

Therefore, the boundary layer equations (3.108), (3.109), (3.117) and (3.120) have the following form for turbulent ﬂow under the assumptions mentioned above, if we ignore the tensor notation and put w1 = wx , w2 = wy , x1 = y and x2 = y: ∂ w¯x ∂ w¯y + =0 (3.133) ∂x ∂y ∂w ¯x ∂ w¯x ∂ p¯ ∂w ¯x ∂ w¯x =− η + w¯y + − wx wy (3.134) ∂x ∂y ∂x ∂y ∂y ∂ ϑ¯ ∂ ϑ¯ ∂ ∂ ϑ¯ (3.135) = λ + w¯y − cp wy ϑ cp w¯x ∂x ∂y ∂y ∂y ∂ ξ¯A ∂ ξ¯A ∂ ∂ ξ¯A w¯x . (3.136) = D + w¯y − wy ξA ∂x ∂y ∂y ∂y The equations are the same as those for laminar ﬂow, except for the terms of the form a b . They account for the eﬀect of the turbulent ﬂuctuations on momentum, heat and mass transfer. The expression − wx wy (SI units N/m2 ) is an averaged momentum ﬂow per unit area, and so comparable to a shear stress: A force in the direction of the y-axis acts at a surface perpendicular to the x-axis. Terms of the general form − wi wj are called Reynolds’ stresses or turbulent stresses. They are symmetrical tensors. In a corresponding manner, the energy equation (3.135), contains a “turbulent heat ﬂux” of the form q˙i = − cp wi ϑ and in the component continuity equation a “turbulent diﬀusional ﬂux” of the form ∗ jAi = − wi ξA appears. As a result of these equations, a total shear stress can also be deﬁned (τxy )tot = η

∂wx − wx wy ∂y

and correspondingly a total heat ﬂux ∂ϑ ∂ϑ (q˙y )tot = − λ − cp wy ϑ = − cp a − wy ϑ ∂y ∂y and a total diﬀusional ﬂux ∗ (jAy )tot

∂ξA = − D − wy ξA . ∂y

(3.137)

(3.138)

(3.139)

330

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

They each consist of a molecular and a turbulent contribution. Momentum, heat and mass transfer are increased by the turbulent contribution. The equations do not make any statement as to how the turbulent contributions are calculated. An additional assumption has to be made for this. A particularly simple rule was made by J.V. Boussinesq (1842–1929), who suggested the following for the Reynolds’ stress − wx wy := εt

∂ w¯x . ∂y

(3.140)

In which εt is the “turbulent viscosity” or “eddy diﬀusivity for momentum transfer” (SI units m2 /s). This then allows the total shear stress to be expressed by (τxy )tot = (ν + εt)

∂w ¯x . ∂y

(3.141)

As the Reynolds stress has to disappear approaching the wall, the turbulent viscosity cannot be constant. Flows adjacent to the wall cannot be described by Boussinesq’s rule, when εt = const is presumed. However for ﬂows like those which occur in turbulent free jets, the assumption of constant turbulent viscosity is highly suitable. Corresponding to the Boussinesq rule a “turbulent thermal diﬀusivity” at (SI units m2 /s) is introduced, through at

∂ ϑ¯ := −wy ϑ . ∂y

(3.142)

It is at = λt / cp with the “turbulent thermal conductivity” or “eddy diﬀusivity for heat transfer” λt (SI units W/K m). The total heat ﬂux is (q˙y )tot = − cp (a + at )

∂ ϑ¯ . ∂y

(3.143)

In addition to this a “turbulent diﬀusion coeﬃcient” or “eddy diﬀusivity for mass transfer” Dt (SI units m2 /s) is deﬁned by Dt

∂ ξ¯A := wy ξA . ∂y

(3.144)

With that the total mass ﬂux is ∗ (jAy )tot = − (D + Dt )

∂ ξ¯A . ∂y

(3.145)

Just like the turbulent viscosity, the turbulent fractions of the thermal diffusivity, thermal conductivity and the diﬀusion coeﬃcient have to disappear at the solid wall. In contrast, at some distance away from the wall the turbulent exchange is far more intensive than the molecular motion. This leads to good mixing of the ﬂuid particles. The result of this is that the velocity, temperature

3.6 Inﬂuence of turbulence on heat and mass transfer

331

Fig. 3.15: Laminar and turbulent velocity proﬁle in ﬂow over a body

and concentration proﬁles are more uniform in the core than those in laminar ﬂows, as shown in Fig. 3.15 for the velocity proﬁles in ﬂow over a body. The velocity at the wall increases more steeply in turbulent ﬂow than in laminar. The shear stress and with that the resistances to ﬂow are larger in turbulent ﬂows than in laminar. Likewise the temperature and concentration gradients at the surface and therefore the heat and mass transfer rates are larger for turbulent ﬂows than in laminar ones. Therefore turbulent ﬂows are to be strived for in heat and mass transfer and for this reason they are present in most technical applications. However better heat and mass transfer has to be paid for by the increased power required for a pump or blower to overcome the resistances to ﬂow.

3.6.1

Turbulent ﬂows near solid walls

In many technical applications, for example ﬂows in channels, the velocity proﬁle close to the wall is only dependent on the distance from the wall. Indicating the velocity parallel to the wall with wx and the coordinate normal to the wall by y, then wx (y), whilst the other velocity components disappear, wy = wz = 0. This type of ﬂow is known as stratiﬁed ﬂow. In steady-state, laminar ﬂows with vanishing pressure gradients, the momentum equation (3.98) is simpliﬁed to ∂ ∂wx ∂τxy η = 0 or =0 , ∂y ∂y ∂y which yields a linear velocity proﬁle wx (y) and a constant shear stress τxy , that is τxy = τ0 = const. In the case of steady-state, turbulent, stratiﬁed ﬂows with vanishing pressure gradients according to (3.134) we obtain ∂ ∂w ¯x η − wx wy = 0 , ∂y ∂y from which, by integration η

∂w ¯x − wx wy = const = τ0 ∂xy

(3.146)

follows. The constant of integration is equal to the shear stress, as at the wall, y = 0, the Reynolds’ stresses disappear, wx wy = 0. In contrast to laminar ﬂow, the velocity w¯x (y) is no longer a linear function of y.

332

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Equation (3.146) can be rearranged into τ0 ∂w ¯x =ν − wx wy . ∂y As we can see τ0 / has the dimensions of the square of the velocity. So wτ := τ0/

(3.147)

(3.148)

is known as the friction velocity. With this (3.147) can also be written as the diﬀerential equation d(w¯x /wτ ) wx wy 1= . (3.149) − d(wτ y/ν) wτ2 The velocity proﬁle obeys a function of the form w y w¯x τ = f (y + ) , = w¯x+ = f (3.150) wτ ν and in addition we have w y wx wy τ = g = g(y+ ) . wτ2 ν

(3.151)

Eq. (3.150) represents the wall law for turbulent ﬂow, ﬁrst formulated by Prandtl in 1925. The functions f (y+ ) and g(y + ) are of a universal nature, because they are independent of external dimensions such as the height of a channel and are valid for all stratiﬁed ﬂows independent of the boundary layer thickness. In order to calculate w¯x /wτ by solving the diﬀerential equation (3.149), the Reynolds stress wx wy has to be known. The hypothesis introduced by Boussinesq (3.140) is unsuitable for this, as according to it, the Reynolds stress does not disappear at the wall. However, the condition wx wy = 0 at the wall is satisﬁed by Prandtl’s mixing length theory, which will now be explained. In order to do this we will consider a ﬂuid element in a turbulent boundary layer, at a distance y from the wall, Fig. 3.16. It has, at a distance y, the mean velocity w¯x (y) and may approach the wall over a small length l with the velocity wy < 0. If, during this, the ﬂuid element maintains its original velocity, at the new position it will have a velocity that is greater by Δw¯x than that of its surroundings. The velocity diﬀerence ∂w ¯x Δw¯x = w¯x (y) − w¯x (y − l ) = l ∂y is a measure of the ﬂuctuation velocity wx . The ﬂuid element displaces another at this new position, thereby generating a cross velocity wy , which with the assumption of small ﬂuctuation velocities, is proportional to the ﬂuctuation velocity. Therefore wx and wy are proportional to l ∂ w ¯x /∂y and so τt = − wx wy = kl2

∂w ¯x ∂ w ¯x ∂y ∂y

3.6 Inﬂuence of turbulence on heat and mass transfer

333

Fig. 3.16: For Prandtl’s mixing length theory

or with kl2 = l2 ∂w ¯x ∂ w¯x . ∂y ∂y

τt = − wx wy = l2

(3.152)

Using the notation with the absolute lines ensures that, corresponding to Newton’s law for laminar ﬂow ∂wx , τxy = η ∂y the turbulent shear stress τt has the same sign as the velocity gradient ∂ w¯x /∂y. According to (3.152), the turbulent viscosity is εt = l 2

∂ w¯x . ∂y

(3.153)

The quantity l is known as the mixing length. As the Reynolds’ stresses disappear at the wall, Prandtl chose the simple hypothesis l = κy .

(3.154)

This means ∂w ¯x ∂wx . ∂y ∂y

τt = − wx wy = κ2y 2

(3.155)

Equation (3.149), for stratiﬁed ﬂow, is transformed into d(w¯x /wτ ) 1= + κ2 y 2 d(wτ y/ν)

dw¯x dy

2

1 . wτ2

(3.156)

As (dw¯x /dy) > 0, here |dw ¯x /dy|(dw¯x /dy) is written as (dwx /dy)2. With the abbreviations w¯x wτ y and y + = w¯x+ = wτ ν we obtain 1=

dw¯x+ + κ2y +2 dy +

dw¯x+ dy +

2

The following solutions are yielded by integration

.

(3.157)

334

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

a) In the laminar sublayer, y → 0 and therefore y + → 0, the second term is negligible, giving (3.158) w¯x+ = y + or taking into account the deﬁnitions for w ¯x+ , y + and wτ τ0 / : τ0 = η

w¯x . y

The velocity proﬁle is replaced by a straight line in the laminar sublayer. b) In the completely turbulent region, a long distance away from the wall, y → ∞ and therefore y + → ∞, the second term outweighs the ﬁrst, and it holds that + 2 dw¯x 2 +2 1=κ y dy + or 1 dy+ dw¯x+ = . κ y+ Integration yields a logarithmic velocity proﬁle w¯x+ =

w¯x 1 = ln y+ + c . wτ κ

(3.159)

The constants κ and c have to be found by experiment. Values for them have been found to be κ ≈ 0.4 and c ≈ 5.

Fig. 3.17: Universal velocity distribution law in the turbulent boundary layer a: Eq. (3.158) b: Eq. (3.159). The abcissa is logarithmic.

In reality the laminar sublayer is continuously transformed into the fully turbulent region. A transition region exists between the two, known as the buﬀer layer, so that the wall law of velocity can be split into three areas, whose boundaries are set by experimentation. The laminar sublayer extends over the region 0 < y+ < 5 ,

3.7 External forced ﬂow

335

the buﬀer-layer region over 5 < y + < 60 and the fully turbulent core over y + > 60 . Fig. 3.17 shows the complete pattern for the velocity proﬁle w ¯x+ as a function of + y .

3.7

External forced ﬂow

In this section we will focus on the heat and mass transfer from or to the surface of a body with external ﬂow. Neighbouring bodies should not be present or should be so far away that the boundary layers on the bodies over which the ﬂuid is ﬂowing can develop freely. Velocities, temperatures and concentrations shall only change in the boundary layer and be constant in the ﬂow outside of the boundary layer. A forced ﬂow, which we will consider here, is obtained from a pump or blower. Local heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients are yielded from equations of the form N u = f (x+ , Re, P r) , Sh = f (x+ , Re, Sc) , whilst their mean values are given by N um = f (Re, P r) ,

Shm = f (Re, Sc) .

In many cases the shape of the body over which the ﬂuid is ﬂowing and with that the ﬂow pattern are so involved that the functional relationship between the quantities can only be found experimentally. This requires the measurement of the heat and mass ﬂows transferred at the body or a geometrically similar model and also the associated temperature and concentration diﬀerences. This then allows the calculation of the heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients as α=

Q˙ AΔϑ

and β =

M˙ A Δξ

and the representation of the Nusselt and Sherwood numbers as functions of the other dimensionless numbers Re, P r and Re, Sc respectively. The power product rules already mentioned are most suitable for the representation of these as equations. The heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients for simple bodies can be calculated by solving the boundary layer equations. This will be discussed in the following sections by means of several characteristic examples.

336

3.7.1

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Parallel ﬂow along a ﬂat plate

Flat plates with parallel ﬂow exist, for example in plate heat exchangers. The ﬁns on a ﬁnned tube are exposed to parallel ﬂows. Curved surfaces like aerofoils or turbine blades can often be considered, with reference to the boundary layer, to be ﬂat plates, because their boundary layers are almost always small in comparison with the radius of curvature. A laminar boundary layer develops right from the front of the plate, Fig. 3.18. It becomes unstable for a certain length, more exactly from a certain Reynolds number Re = wm xl /ν 6 · 104 formed with the length xl onwards. Whilst below this Reynolds number — we talk of the indiﬀerence point of the ﬂow — the ﬂow is always laminar, the small disturbances in ﬂow above this Reynolds number no longer die out. However, disturbances of very large and also those of very small wave lengths will be dampened as before. This was ﬁrst proved by Tollmien [3.5]. The ﬂow does not immediately become fully turbulent, instead a transition region, which is partly laminar and partly turbulent, follows the laminar region from the indiﬀerence point onwards. It ﬁrst becomes fully turbulent ﬂow when a suﬃciently large Reynolds number Recr = wm xcr /ν of Recr = 3 · 105

to 5 · 105

has been attained. The transition region strongly depends on the surface roughness of the plate and the inlet ﬂow at its front. When all disturbances are kept very small the ﬂow will be laminar up to Reynolds numbers of 106 . The state is then metastable and the smallest disturbance leads to a transition into fully turbulent ﬂow.

Fig. 3.18: Parallel ﬂow on a ﬂat plate

In the immediate vicinity of the solid wall, the turbulent ﬂuctuations will be damped even in fully turbulent ﬂow. In this thin layer adjacent to the wall, also known as the viscous sublayer, the viscous eﬀect of the ﬂuid outweighs that of its turbulent viscosity. 3.7.1.1

Laminar boundary layer

We will now focus on heat and mass transfer in the laminar boundary layer of parallel ﬂow on a plate. The ﬂow is steady, dissipation is negligible and we will

3.7 External forced ﬂow

337

presume constant material properties. Chemical reactions shall not occur. The boundary layer equations consist of the continuity equation ∂wx ∂wy + =0 , ∂x ∂y

(3.160)

the momentum equation wx

∂wx ∂wx ∂ 2wx + wy =ν ∂x ∂y ∂y 2

(3.161)

∂ 2ϑ ∂ϑ ∂ϑ + wy =a 2 . ∂x ∂y ∂y

(3.162)

and the energy equation wx

With regard to mass transfer we will restrict ourselves to a binary mixture with components that have approximately the same speciﬁc heat capacities, so that the energy equation remains valid in the form given above. In addition the continuity equation for a component holds wx

∂ξA ∂ξA ∂ 2 ξA . + wy =D ∂x ∂y ∂y 2

(3.163)

As the material properties have been presumed to be independent of the temperature and composition, the velocity ﬁeld is independent of the temperature and concentration ﬁelds, so the continuity and momentum equations can be solved independently of the energy and component continuity equations. Integral methods We will ﬁrst study a solution of the system of equations using an integral method, which leads to a simple and closed approximate solution. Integral methods are applied to many other boundary layer problems, in particular those involving compressible ﬂows. However, with the introduction of electronic computers they have lost their importance. The basic idea behind the integral methods is that we do not need a complete solution of the boundary layer equation and are content instead with a solution that satisﬁes the equations in an integral (average) fashion over the entire boundary. By integrating the continuity equation (3.160) over the thickness of the boundary layer δ we obtain δ δ ∂wx ∂wy dy + dy = 0 ∂x ∂y 0

0

or with wy (y = 0) = 0:

δ wy (δ) = − 0

∂wx dy . ∂x

(3.164)

338

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

The momentum equation (3.161) can, taking into account the continuity equation (3.160), also be written in the following form ∂ 2 wx ∂wx2 ∂(wx wy ) + =ν . ∂x ∂y ∂y2 Integration between the limits y = 0 and y = δ gives, under consideration of δ

∂(wx wy ) dy = wx (δ)wy (δ) = −wδ ∂y

0

δ

∂wx dy , ∂x

0

the integral condition for momentum d dx

δ wx (wδ − wx ) dy = ν

∂wx ∂y

.

(3.165)

y=0

0

The energy equation (3.162), taking into account the continuity equation (3.160), may be written as follows ∂(wx ϑ) ∂(wy ϑ) ∂ 2ϑ + =a 2 . ∂x ∂y ∂y Integration between the limits y = 0 and y = δT yields, with consideration of δT

∂(wy ϑ) dy = wy (δT )ϑ(δT ) = −ϑ(δT ) ∂y

δT

∂wx dy ∂x

0

δ

the integral condition for energy d dx

δT wx (ϑ(δT ) − ϑ) dy = a

∂ϑ ∂y

0

.

(3.166)

y=0

After a corresponding integration between the limits y = 0 and y = δc , the continuity equation (3.162) for a component A is transformed into the integral condition for mass transfer d dx

δc wx (ξAδc − ξA ) dy = D 0

∂ξA ∂y

.

(3.167)

y=0

In the integral condition (3.165) for momentum the velocity proﬁle is approximated by a polynomial ﬁrst suggested by Pohlhausen [3.6], such that y y 2 y 3 wx = a0 + a1 + a3 , (3.168) + a2 wδ δ δ δ

3.7 External forced ﬂow

339

in which the free coeﬃcients are determined, so that the boundary conditions ∂wx wx (y = δ) = wδ , =0 wx (y = 0) = 0 , ∂y y=δ and the wall condition from the momentum equation (3.161) 2 ∂ wx =0 , ∂y2 y=0 according to which the curvature of the velocity proﬁle at the wall is zero, are satisﬁed. We ﬁnd a0 = a2 = 0, a1 = 3/2 and a2 = −1/2 and with this 3 y 1 y 3 wx − = . (3.169) wδ 2δ 2 δ This velocity proﬁle transforms the integral condition (3.165) for momentum into an ordinary diﬀerential equation for the still unknown boundary layer thickness δ 39 2 d 3 wδ w δ =ν dx 280 δ 2 δ or 140 ν d(δ2 /2) = . dx 13 wδ Through integration, with δ(x = 0) = 0 follows δ = 4.64

νx wδ

1/2 = 4.64

x 1/2

(3.170)

Rex

with Rex = wδ x/ν. The boundary layer increases with the square root of the length x. The gradient of the velocity proﬁle at the wall, according to (3.169), is ∂wx 3 wδ = . ∂y y=0 2 δ With the introduction of the boundary layer thickness, this yields the wall shear stress to be 0.323 ∂wx τ0 = η = wδ2 . ∂y y=0 (wδ x/ν)1/2 The friction factor is τ0 0.646 . (3.171) = 2 1/2 wδ /2 Rex Likewise, a polynomial is introduced for the temperature proﬁle 2 3 y y y ϑ − ϑ0 + = b0 + b1 + b2 + b3 , ϑ = ϑδT − ϑ0 δT δT δT

340

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

which should satisfy both the boundary conditions +

ϑ (y = 0) = 0 ;

+

ϑ (y = δT ) = 1 ;

∂ϑ+ ∂y

=0 y=δT

and the wall condition that follows from the energy equation (3.162) 2 + ∂ ϑ =0 . ∂y2 y=0 The same constants as those for the velocity proﬁle (3.169) are found with this. They are 3 2 y 1 y + ϑ = − . (3.172) 3 δT 2 δT Once the temperature and velocity proﬁle (3.169) have been substituted into the integral condition for energy (3.166), the integration yields a diﬀerential equation for the boundary layer thickness δT

d 1 δT2 a 1 1 δT4 δ = − . 2 4 dx 10 δ 140 δ wδ δT We will now consider ﬂows where δT /δ < 1. This allows us to neglect the second term in the square brackets in comparison to the ﬁrst term, thereby simplifying the equation to 10a 1 d δT2 = . dx δ wδ δT By abbreviating k = δT /δ and writing equation (3.170) as δ = c0 x1/2 with c0 = (280/13) 1/2 (ν/wδ )1/2 , the diﬀerential equation given above is transformed into kx1/2

10a 13 d 2 1/2 = (k x ) = . 2 dx wδ c0 28 P r

The substitution of z = k 3 converts this equation into the ordinary diﬀerential equation d 13 z 1/3 x1/2 (z 2/3x1/2) = dx 28 P r or diﬀerentiated out 13 4 dz x +z = . (3.173) 3 dx 14 P r A particular solution is 13 , z= 14 P r and as the solution of the homogeneous equation, with z = xm we ﬁnd the value m = −3/4. The complete solution is z=

13 + cx−3/4 . 14 P r

3.7 External forced ﬂow

341

The remaining free constant c is yielded from the condition that the plate is ﬁrst heated from a position x0 ; so z(x0) = 0 and c=−

13 x0 3/4 . 14 P r

From this follows k=

√ 3

δT = z= δ

13 14 P r

1/3 x 3/4 1/3 0 1− . x

(3.174)

If the plate is heated over its entire length, then x0 = 0 and the ratio of thermal to velocity boundary layer is simply a function of the Prandtl number 1/3 δT 13 0.976 = = . (3.175) δ 14 P r P r1/3 The Prandtl numbers of ideal gases lie between around 0.6 and 0.9, so that their thermal boundary layer is only slightly thicker than their velocity boundary layer. Liquids have Prandtl numbers above one and viscous oils greater than 1000. The thermal boundary layer is therefore thinner than the velocity boundary layer. By the presumptions made, the solution is only valid if δT /δ < 1. This means that the solution is good for liquids, approximate for gases but cannot be applied to ﬂuids with Prandtl numbers P r 1, such as appear in liquid metals. Heat transfer coeﬃcients are calculated from the transferred heat ﬂux to be ∂ϑ q˙ = −λ = α(ϑ0 − ϑ(δT )) . ∂y y=0 In which, according to (3.172), ∂ϑ 3 = (ϑ(δT ) − ϑ0) ∂y y=0 2δT and therefore

3 λ . 2 δT The heat transfer coeﬃcient is inversely proportional to the thickness of the thermal boundary layer. As this increases with x1/2, α ∼ x−1/2 . Putting the thickness of the thermal boundary layer according to (3.175), along with that of the velocity boundary layer (3.170) yields, after a slight rearrangement, the Nusselt number α=

N ux =

αx = 0.331 Rex1/2 P r1/3 . λ

(3.176)

It will further be shown that the exact solution of the boundary layer equation yields a value of 0.332 which is only very slightly diﬀerent from the value 0.331 obtained here.

342

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

The concentration boundary layer and the mass transfer coeﬃcient can immediately be found from the equations given previously, as the integral condition (3.167) for mass transfer corresponds to that for heat transfer. The temperature ϑ is replaced by the mass fraction ξA , the thermal diﬀusivity a by the diﬀusion coeﬃcient D, and instead of the thermal boundary layer δT the concentration boundary layer δc is used. This then gives us the concentration proﬁle corresponding to (3.172): 3 ξA − ξA0 3 y 1 y = − . (3.177) ξAδ − ξA0 2 δc 2 δc The thickness of the boundary layer corresponding to (3.175), under the prerequisite that the ﬂow and concentration boundary layers begin at the same position, δc 0.976 = 1/3 , δ Sc

(3.178)

is valid for Sc ≥ 0.6, and in place of (3.176) we have the equation for mass transfer Shx =

βx 1/3 = 0.331 Re1/2 . x Sc D

(3.179)

Example 3.7: Based on the solution (3.174) calculate the Nusselt number for parallel ﬂow on a ﬂat plate, if the thermal and velocity boundary layers are separated by x0 , see Fig. 3.19. Find the Sherwood number for the case of x0 = 0.

Fig. 3.19: Flow and thermal boundary layer in a laminar parallel ﬂow on a ﬂat plate

We have α = (3/2) λ/δT . Introducing δT according to (3.174), under consideration of the expression (3.170) for the velocity boundary layer, yields N ux =

x 3/4 −1/3 αx 0 1/3 = 0.331 Re1/2 1− , x Pr λ x

from which, for x0 = 0, the known equation (3.176) follows. Correspondingly for the Sherwood number we obtain Sh =

x 3/4 −1/3 βx 0 1/3 = 0.331 Re1/2 1− . x Sc D x

3.7 External forced ﬂow

343

Exact solution of the boundary layer equations We presume the outer ﬂow to be an undisturbed parallel ﬂow of velocity w∞ . The calculation of the velocities wx and wy follows from the solution of the continuity equation (3.160) and the momentum equation (3.161) under the boundary conditions y = 0,

x>0: y→∞:

w x = wy = 0 wx = w∞

and the initial condition x = 0,

y>0:

w x = w∞ .

Blasius [3.6] introduced in his thesis at the University of G¨ottingen in 1908 a stream function ψ(x, y) for the solution, which has the property that wx =

∂ψ ∂y

and

wy = −

∂ψ . ∂x

(3.180)

Through this the continuity equation will be identically satisﬁed. The momentum equation is transformed into a partial diﬀerential equation ∂ψ ∂ 2 ψ ∂3 ψ ∂ψ ∂ 2 ψ =ν . − 2 ∂y ∂y∂x ∂x ∂y ∂y 3

(3.181)

As according to (3.170), δ ∼ (νx/w∞ )1/2 holds for the velocity boundary layer, the distance y from the wall can usefully be related to the boundary layer thickness δ, so introducing a dimensionless variable w 1/2 ∞ η + := y = g(x, y) . νx The earlier considerations have already shown that the velocity proﬁle can be approximately represented by statements of the form y wx . =ϕ wδ δ It is therefore appropriate to assume that the velocity proﬁle can be represented by the variable η + alone. We choose the statement wx = ϕ(η + ) . w∞ A solution exists when the diﬀerential equation (3.181) and its associated boundary conditions can be fulﬁlled with this statement. In order to show that this is applicable, we will form a stream function y ψ=

y wx dy = w∞ δ

0

η+

1/2 y νx ϕ(η ) d ϕ(η + ) dη + = w∞ δ w∞ +

0

0

or ψ = (w∞νx)1/2 f (η + ) . The normalisation of the stream function and the coordinate y normal to the wall strongly follows from the fact that (3.181) is invariant in a transformation ˜ x, y˜) = cψ(x, y) ψ(˜ with x ˜ = c2 x and y˜ = cy. This can be checked by putting this into (3.181). The variables ψ, x, y can therefore only appear in the solution in certain combinations that do not contain the factor c. These types of combinations are ψ˜ x x ˜ ψ , from which follows =f = f y y2 y˜ y˜2

344

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

or

y˜ ψ˜ √ =f √ . x ˜ x ˜ √ √ The stream function given above is just of the form ψ/ x = f (y/ x). With the stream function we obtain the derivatives which appear in (3.181) ψ √ =f x

y √ x

,

∂ψ = w x = w∞ f ∂y ∂2ψ = w∞ ∂y 2

w∞ f νx

;

from which follows

∂ψ 1 = −wy = ∂x 2

;

∂3ψ w2 = ∞ f ∂y 3 νx

and

w∞ ν (f − η + f ) ; x

1 w∞ + ∂2ψ =− η f . ∂y∂x 2 x

(3.182)

Putting these derivatives into (3.181), leaves the ordinary non-linear diﬀerential equation f +

1 ff = 0 2

(3.183)

for the function f (η + ). The boundary conditions are η+ = 0 :

y = 0 or y → ∞ or

η+ → ∞ :

f = f = 0 f = 1 .

(3.184)

The initial condition x = 0, y > 0 : wx = w∞ is already contained in the boundary condition f (η + → ∞) = 1. Equation (3.183) was ﬁrst solved numerically by Blasius [3.6] through power series laws, and later by many other authors (e.g. [3.7], [3.8]). In the numerical integration, instead of the boundary condition f (η + → ∞) = 1 a further initial condition f (η + = 0) = const = c0 could be introduced. However this would require multiple estimations of c0 , until the condition f (η + → ∞) = 1 is satisﬁed. The multiple numerical solutions can be avoided if the boundary value problem is traced back to an initial value problem. This is possible in a simple manner, as (3.183) remains invariant through the transformation f˜(˜ η + ) = cf (η +) with η˜+ = η + /c. This means it is transformed into an equation 1 f˜ + f˜f˜ = 0 2 which is independent of the constants c. The boundary conditions f (η + = 0) = f (η + = 0) = 0 also remain independent of the choice of c f˜(˜ η + = 0) = f˜ (˜ η + = 0) = 0 . η + = 0) = 0 and The equation above is solved with the initial conditions f˜(˜ η + = 0) = f˜ (˜ + + 2 + ˜ ˜ f (˜ η = 0) = 1 and then the constants c are determined from f (˜ η → ∞) = c f (η → ∞) = c2 . Fig. 3.20 illustrates the velocity proﬁle wx /w∞ = f (η + ). In the region close to the wall f (η + ) = 0.332 057 η +2 /2 + O(η +5 ) is valid. The coordinate transformation makes all the velocities coincide. The boundary layer approaches the core ﬂow asymptotically and in principle stretches into inﬁnity. The deviation of the velocity wx from that of the core ﬂow is, however, negligibly small at a ﬁnite distance from the wall. Therefore the boundary layer thickness can be deﬁned as the distance from the wall at which wx /w∞ is slightly diﬀerent from one. As an example, if we choose the value of 0.99 for wx /w∞ , the numerical calculation yields that this value will be reached at the point η + ≈ 4.910.

3.7 External forced ﬂow

345

Fig. 3.20: Velocity proﬁle on a ﬂat plate

The boundary layer thickness deﬁned by this is then x δ = 4.910 1/2 Rex

(3.185)

which is in good agreement with the approximation (3.170). The wall shear stress is + ∂η ∂wx ∂wx τ0 = η =η ∂y y=0 ∂η + η+ =0 ∂y y=0 w 1/2 ∞ = η w∞ f (η + = 0) . νx The numerical solution delivers f (η + = 0) = 0.3321. The friction factor is found to be τ0 0.664 = , 2 /2 1/2 w∞ Rex

(3.186)

which only varies slightly from the approximate value in (3.171).

In the calculation of the temperature and concentration ﬁelds the velocities are replaced by the stream function in the energy equation (3.162) and the component continuity equation (3.163). In addition a dimensionless temperature ϑ+ =

ϑ − ϑ0 ϑ∞ − ϑ0

and a dimensionless mass fraction ξA+ =

ξA − ξA0 ξA∞ − ξA0

are introduced. The temperature will be represented by ϑ(η + ) and the concentration proﬁle by ϕ(η+ ). With that, the energy equation (3.162), taking into account (3.180), is transformed into 2 ∂ψ ∂ϑ+ ∂η + ∂ψ ∂ϑ+ ∂η + ∂ 2 ϑ+ ∂η + (3.187) − = a +2 ∂y ∂η + ∂x ∂x ∂η + ∂y ∂y ∂η and the continuity equation (3.163) into ∂ψ ∂ξA+ ∂η + ∂ψ ∂ξA+ ∂η + ∂ 2 ξA+ − = D ∂y ∂η + ∂x ∂x ∂η + ∂y ∂η +2

∂η+ ∂y

2 .

(3.188)

346

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Using the derivatives (3.182) of the stream function these equations can be rearranged into ordinary diﬀerential equations 1 ϑ+ + P r f ϑ+ = 0 (3.189) 2 1 + + + Sc f ξA =0 . (3.190) ξA 2 The boundary conditions are η+ = 0 : η+ → ∞ :

+ ϑ + = ξA =0 + ϑ + = ξA =1 .

Integrating (3.189) once gives +

η ϑ

+

+

+

= ϑ (η = 0) exp

1 − Pr f 2

dη + .

(3.191)

0

On the other hand (3.183) can also be written as 1 d ln f =− f , dη + 2 from which

+

η +

f = f (η = 0) exp

1 − f dη + 2

0

follows. This allows us to eliminate the exponential function in (3.191), producing P r

f ϑ+ = ϑ+ (η + = 0) + . f (η = 0)

After integration, and by taking the boundary conditions ϑ+ (η + = 0) = 0 and ϑ (η + → ∞) = 1 into account, the temperature proﬁle follows as +

η !+

(f )P r dη + ϑ − ϑ0 0 = !∞ . ϑ = ϑ∞ − ϑ0 P r + (f ) dη +

(3.192)

0

Correspondingly the concentration proﬁle is yielded as η !+

ξA+

(f )Sc dη + ξA − ξA0 0 = = !∞ . ξA∞ − ξA0 (f )Sc dη + 0

The heat ﬂux transferred is + ∂ϑ ∂η + ∂ϑ q˙ = −λ = −λ (ϑ∞ − ϑ0 ) + ∂y y=0 ∂η η+ =0 ∂y

(3.193)

3.7 External forced ﬂow

347

with

∂η + w∞ 1/2 . = ∂y νx On the other hand the heat transfer coeﬃcient α is deﬁned by q˙ = α(ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) and with this we obtain αx w∞ x 1/2 [f (η + = 0)]P r = !∞ λ ν (f )P r dη + 0

+

with f (η = 0) = 0.332. This can also be written as αx = Rex1/2 F (P r) . N ux = λ Once again a corresponding equation exists for mass transfer

(3.194)

βx = Rex1/2F (Sc) . (3.195) D The functions F (P r) and F (Sc) are identical and are found from a numerical solution. The following relationships are good approximations Shx =

N ux = 0.564 Rex1/2 P r1/2 N ux =

0.500 Rex1/2

N ux =

0.332 Rex1/2

N ux =

0.339 Rex1/2

for P r → 0

Pr

1/2

for 0.005 < P r < 0.05

Pr

1/3

for 0.6 < P r < 10

Pr

1/3

for P r ≥ 10 .

(3.196)

An equation valid for all Prandtl-numbers 0 ≤ P r ≤ ∞ is 1 N ux = √ Rex1/2 ϕ1 (P r) π P r1/2 with ϕ1(P r) = (1 + 1.973 P r0.272 + 21.29 P r)1/6

(3.196a)

In the range 0.05 ≤ P r ≤ ∞ the error in N ux is below 0.3%. In the range 0 ≤ P r < 0.05 the error does not exceed 1.5%. A similar equation holds for constant heat ﬂux q˙ =const at the wall: √ π 1/2 Rex ϕ2 (P r) N ux = (3.196b) 2 1/2 Pr with ϕ2 (P r) = (1 + 2.55 P r1/4 + 48.66 P r)1/6 In the range 0.2 ≤ P r ≤ ∞ the error in N ux is below 0.13%, and in the range 0 ≤ P r < 0.2 it does not exceed 2.4%. Corresponding equations also hold for mass transfer. The Sherwood number Shx appears in place of the Nusselt number N ux , and in the same way the Prandtl number P r number is replaced by the Schmidt number Sc. In the region 0.6 < P r < 10 the agreement with the approximation equations (3.176) is excellent.

348

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Example 3.8: Derive from the local Nusselt number (3.196), equations for the mean Nusselt numbers N um = αm L/λ with αm =

1 L

L α(x) dx . 0

For a given Prandtl number, according to (3.196), α = c x−1/2 . With that we have 1 c L

αm =

L

x−1/2 dx = 2 c L−1/2 = 2 α(x = L) .

0

In addition the following is valid N um =

αm L = 2 N u(x = L) . λ

Then with Re = (w∞ L)/ν

3.7.1.2

N um

=

1.128 Re1/2 P r 1/2

for P r → 0

N um

=

1.000 Re1/2 P r 1/2

for 0.005 < P r < 0.05

N um

=

0.664 Re1/2 P r 1/3

for 0.6 < P r < 10

N um

=

0.678 Re1/2 P r 1/3

for P r ≥ 10 .

Turbulent ﬂow

The Reynolds analogy, which links the heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients to the friction factor, according to N ux Shx cf = = Rex Rex 2

for

P r = Sc = 1 ,

already delivers a simple relationship for the heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients, as the friction factor is known from measurements [3.9]: cf = 0.0592 Re−1/5 x

for 5 · 105 < Re < 107

with Rex = wm x/ν. With that we get N ux Shx = = 0.0296 Re−1/5 x Rex Rex

for P r = Sc = 1

in the same range of Reynolds numbers. According to Chilton and Colburn [3.10], [3.11] the eﬀect of the Prandtl number on the heat transfer can be described by the empirical statement 1/3 N ux = 0.0296 Re4/5 , x Pr

(3.197)

3.7 External forced ﬂow

349

which is valid for 0.6 < P r < 60 and 5 · 105 < Rex < 107 . Correspondingly for the mass transfer coeﬃcients Shx = 0.0296 Rex4/5 Sc1/3 ,

(3.198)

valid for 0.6 < Sc < 3 000 and 5 · 105 < Rex < 107 . Colburn has introduced the Stanton number St =

N ux cf P r−2/3 = P r−2/3 = 0.0296 Re−1/5 x Rex P r 2

(3.199)

instead of the Nusselt number in (3.197), cf. section 1.1.4. A better analytically based equation which is valid over a wide range of Prandtl or Schmidt numbers is obtained if we presume a turbulent parallel ﬂow, i.e. a steady-state turbulent ﬂow with vanishing pressure gradient, and velocity, temperature and concentration proﬁles which are only dependent on the coordinate y normal to the wall. Then, as follows from (3.134) to (3.139), ∗ ∂(jAy )tot ∂(τxy )tot ∂(q˙y )tot = = =0 . ∂y ∂y ∂y

The total values for the shear stress, heat and diﬀusional ﬂuxes are independent of the coordinate normal to the wall and therefore equal to the values at the wall. In the laminar sublayer we have τxy = ν

∂wx = τ0 ∂y

and ∗ jAy = − D

Out of these we obtain

q˙y = − cp a

,

∂ϑ = q˙0 ∂y

∂ξA ∗ = jA0 . ∂y

1 ∂wx τ0 = − Pr q˙0 cp ∂ϑ

and after integrating from the wall to the boundary (index r) of the laminar sublayer, Fig. 3.21

Fig. 3.21: The two layer model of the Prandtl analogy

ϑr − ϑ0 = −

q˙0 P r wr . τ0 cp

(3.200)

350

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Correspondingly

∗ jA0 Sc wr . (3.201) τ0 We will now assume that the fully turbulent core adjoins directly the laminar sublayer, as in Fig. 3.21, and that Boussinesq’s laws (3.141), (3.143) and (3.145) are valid, which accordingly give

ξr − ξ0 = −

∂ w¯x , ∂y ∂ ϑ¯ = − cp (a + at) and ∂y ∂ ξ¯A = − (D + Dt) . ∂y

(τxy )tot = (ν + εt ) (q˙y )tot ∗ )tot (jAy

In the turbulent core ν εt, a at and D Dt. Therefore ∂w ¯x τ0 1 (τxy )tot = = P rt ¯ (q˙y )tot q˙0 cp ∂ϑ with the “turbulent Prandtl number” P rt = εt/at . Integration from the boundary r of the laminar sublayer to the turbulent core (index ∞) yields, with the assumption that the turbulent Prandtl number P rt is constant, q˙0 P rt (w¯∞ − wr ) . ϑ¯∞ − ϑr = − τ0 c p

(3.202)

The corresponding equation for mass transfer is ∗

j ξ¯A∞ − ξAr = − A0 Sct (w¯∞ − wr ) . τ0

(3.203)

By adding (3.200) and (3.202) together, and under the assumption P rt = 1, we obtain q˙0 [w¯∞ + (P r − 1) wr ] . ϑ¯∞ − ϑ0 = − τ0 cp Then, because q˙0 = α(ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) the following relationship for the heat transfer coeﬃcient α is obtained τ0 c p 1 . α= w¯∞ 1 + (P r − 1) wr /w¯∞ 2 With cf = τ0 /( w¯∞ /2) as the friction factor the equation given above can be written as α cf 1 = Stx = . (3.204) cp w¯∞ 2 1 + (P r − 1) wr /w¯∞ The expression α/( cp w¯∞ ) is equal to the Stanton number,

St =

N ux α αx/λ . = w¯ ν c = ∞ p Rex P r cp w¯∞ ν λ

3.7 External forced ﬂow

351

The velocity ratio wr /w¯∞ can be eliminated from (3.204), because in the laminar sublayer it holds that wr , τ0 = η δr where δr is its thickness. As explained in 3.6.1, the laminar sublayer extends to the point y + = wτ δr /ν ≈ 5. Therefore, because wτ = τ0 / τ0 / δr ≈5 . ν Eliminating δr from the previous equation with this, and taking into consideration η = ν , we obtain w2 τ0 = x . 25 It follows from this that wr2 2 τ0 = = c f 2 /2 2 25 w¯∞ w¯∞ or cf wr . =5 w¯∞ 2 With this the relationship in (3.204) is transformed into St =

cf 1 . 2 1 + (P r − 1) 5 cf /2

(3.205)

A corresponding calculation for mass transfer, under the assumption of a “turbulent Schmidt number” Sct = εt/Dt = 1, leads to the analogous expression St =

1 cf 2 1 + (Sc − 1) 5 cf /2

(3.206)

with the Stanton number St for mass transfer St = Shx /Rex Sc. Equations (3.205) and (3.206) for the local heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients represent the Prandtl analogy. In the limiting case of P r = Sc = 1 they are transformed into the Reynolds analogy (3.130). In practical terms the mean Stanton number is of greatest interest. It is obtained, after introduction of the friction factor cf (Rex ), by integrating (3.205) or (3.206). However the agreement with measured values is still unsatisfactory because the splitting of the boundary layer into a laminar sublayer which adjoins a fully turbulent layer based on the Prandtl analogy is too coarse, and in addition to this the determination of the thickness of the laminar sublayer with y+ = 5 is only an approximation. However the Prandtl analogy was the basis for the establishment of empirical equations which agree better with measured values. An example of this is the equation derived by Gnielinski [3.13] from a relationship given by Petukhov and Popov [3.12] for the mean Nusselt number N um =

0.037 Re0.8 P r 1 + 2.443 Re−0.1 (P r2/3 − 1)

(3.207)

352

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

with N um = αm L/λ, Re = w¯∞ L/ν. It is valid for 5 · 105 < Re < 107 and 0.6 < P r < 2 000. The material properties are calculated at the average ﬂuid temperature ϑm , deﬁned as the arithmetic mean of the inlet and outlet temperatures. In the transition region between laminar and turbulent ﬂow, good agreement is obtained through a quadratic superposition " N um =

N u2m, lam + N u2m, turb ,

(3.208)

in which N um, lam is the mean Nusselt number for laminar ﬂow N um, lam = 2N ux with N ux according to (3.196) and N um, turb is that of the turbulent ﬂow according to (3.207). In (3.208), at low Reynolds numbers the turbulent contribution will be small and conversely at large Reynolds numbers the laminar contribution will be small. It can therefore be used over the total range of Reynolds numbers 10 < Re < 107 . Naturally a corresponding equation for mass transfer exists for the same range of Reynolds numbers and for 0.7 < Sc < 70 000. In this case the Nusselt number is replaced by the Sherwood number and likewise the Prandtl by the Schmidt number. Example 3.9: Derive a relationship for the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient for parallel ﬂow on a plate from the local heat transfer equations (3.176) for 0.6 < P r < 10 and (3.197). Within this you should take into account that the boundary layer ﬂow is laminar to begin with and becomes turbulent above a critical Reynolds number (Rex )cr = 5 · 105 . We have ⎡ x ⎤ cr L 1 ⎣ αm = αlam dx + αturb dx⎦ . L x=0

x=xcr

With (3.176) and (3.197) we get ⎡ ⎤ w 1/2 xcr dx w 4/5 L dx λ ⎣ ∞ ∞ ⎦ P r 1/3 + 0.0296 αm = 0.331 L ν ν dx1/2 dx1/5 x=0

N um =

x=xcr

$ αm L # = 0.662 Rex 1/2 + 0.037 Re4/5 − Rex 4/5 P r 1/3 . λ cr cr

From this, with (Rex )cr = 5 · 105 , follows N um = (0.037 Re4/5 − 872) P r 1/3 , which holds for Re = w0 L/ν ≥ 5 · 105 .

3.7 External forced ﬂow

3.7.2

353

The cylinder in crossﬂow

The boundary layer for a cylinder in crossﬂow already has a ﬁnite thickness at the forward stagnation point, x = 0 in Fig. 3.22, whilst in parallel ﬂow along a plate its initial thickness is zero. At the forward stagnation point the kinetic energy of the ﬂuid in an adiabatic ﬂow is completely converted into enthalpy, h + w2 /2 = h0 . A ﬂuid element possesses a higher enthalpy at the stagnation point than upstream of it. If the ﬂow is considered as reversible this leads to an increase in the pressure at the stagnation point because h = h(s, p) with s = const. The pressure decreases from the stagnation point onwards. A ﬂuid element on a streamline close to the surface of the body, accelerates again and so moves into the area of decreasing pressure. Beyond the thickest part of the body, the pressure increases again and the ﬂuid element will be slowed down. However real ﬂows are not reversible, some of the kinetic energy will be dissipated and converted into internal energy due to friction in the boundary layer. The kinetic energy gained in the acceleration phase is therefore lower than in reversible ﬂow. As a result of this the total kinetic energy of the ﬂuid element will have been converted into enthalpy whilst it is still in the region of increasing pressure. At this point, known as the separation point, the ﬂuid near the surface lacks suﬃcient momentum to overcome the pressure gradient. Under the inﬂuence of this pressure increase the element moves against the direction of ﬂow. The boundary layer detaches from the surface and a wake is formed in the downstream region. The core ﬂow is pushed away from the surface of the body. Beyond this separation point the pressure is practically constant, the ﬂow is irregular and characterised by vortex formations. In this region, known as dead water, heat and mass transfer come to a virtual stand still. In boundary layers with a pressure increase in the direction of ﬂow, the ﬂow can become detached. This can be seen in the momentum equation (3.109), which due to wx = wy = 0 is transformed into 2 dp ∂ wx (3.209) = η ∂y2 y=0 dx at the wall. According to this the pressure drop in the outer ﬂow determines the curvature of the velocity proﬁle at the wall. When the core ﬂow is at constant

Fig. 3.22: Flow boundary layer around a cylindrical solid. S stagnation point, A detachment point of the boundary layer

354

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

pressure the curvature is zero, and the velocity proﬁle ajacent to the wall can be replaced by a straight line. In regions where the pressure is increasing, dp/dx > 0 and η(∂ 2 wx /∂y 2 )y=0 > 0. This corresponds to a velocity proﬁle like that drawn on the right in Fig. 3.22. According to Bernoulli’s equation dwδ dp =− dx dx the core ﬂow decelerates. Detachment of the boundary layer is only possible in a decelerating core ﬂow. In turbulent ﬂow, momentum is constantly fed into the layer adjacent to the wall because of the momentum transfer between layers at diﬀerent velocities. The kinetic energy of the ﬂuid elements close to the wall does not decrease as rapidly as in laminar ﬂow. This means that turbulent boundary layers do not become detached as quickly as laminar boundary layers. Heat and mass transfer close to the wall is not only promoted by turbulence, the ﬂuid also ﬂows over a larger surface area without detachment. At the same time the pressure resistance is lower because the ﬂuid ﬂow does not separate from the surface for a longer ﬂow path. The ﬂow pattern around a cylinder in crossﬂow is heavily dependent on the Reynolds number, as Fig. 3.23 clearly shows for a circular cylinder. At low wδ

Fig. 3.23: Flow across a circular cylinder at diﬀerent Reynolds numbers

Fig. 3.24: Local heat transfer coeﬃcients in ﬂow across a circular cylinder, according to Giedt [3.14]

3.7 External forced ﬂow

355

Reynolds numbers Re = w∞ d/ν < 5, Fig. 3.23a, the ﬂow surrounds the cylinder; between 5 and up to 15 ≤ Re ≤ 40, Fig. 3.23b, it already becomes detached, and vortices form. At higher Reynolds numbers 40 ≤ Re ≤ 150, Fig. 3.23c, the vortices are periodically carried away forming a vortex pattern in which the ﬂow is still laminar. This becomes turbulent at Reynolds numbers between 150 ≤ Re ≤ 300, and is fully turbulent in the range 300 < Re < 3 · 105 , Fig. 3.23d. Above Re = 3 · 105 the boundary layer downstream of the cylinder is also turbulent. The wake is concentrated in a narrow region and is fully turbulent, Fig. 3.23e, and does not contain any large eddies. A narrow, fully turbulent vortex pattern ﬁrst reforms above Re ≈ 3.5 · 106 , Fig. 3.23 f. The ﬂow inﬂuences the heat and mass transfer in a complex way, as Fig. 3.24 shows, in which the local Nusselt number is plotted against the angular coordinate starting from the forward stagnation point. The Nusselt number decreases from the stagnation point onwards as the boundary layer develops. It reaches a minimum at an angle of around 80◦ . The ﬂow begins to detach itself at this point, and the heat transfer increases along the perimeter, where the ﬂuid is well mixed due to the vortices. At high Reynolds numbers above 105 two minima in the local Nusselt number appear. The stark increase between an angle of 80◦ and 100◦ is caused by the transition between the initially laminar into a turbulent boundary layer. This increases downstream, inhibiting the heat transfer, until an angle of around 140◦ is reached. At this point the heat transfer once more improves as a result of better mixing of ﬂuid in the wake. In practice, the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient is of greatest interest. It can be described by empirical correlations of the form p Pr , (3.210) N um = c Rem P rn P r0 in which the mean Nusselt and the Reynolds number are formed with the tube diameter. All material properties should be calculated at the free stream temperature ϑ∞ , except the Prandtl number P r0 , that should be taken at the wall temˇ perature ϑ0 . The coeﬃcients c, m, n, and p are taken from a paper by Zukauskas [3.15] and are exhibited in Table 3.1. A single, empirical equation for all Reynolds numbers 1 ≤ Re ≤ 105 and for Prandtl numbers 0.7 < P r < 600 has been communicated by Gnielinski [3.13]. It is " N um = 0.3 + N u2m, lam + N u2m, turb (3.211) with N um, lam = 2N ux (x = L) according to (3.196) and N um, turb from (3.207). The length L in these equations is taken to be the circumference over which the ﬂuid ﬂows L = dπ/2. In the case of mass transfer the Nusselt number has to be replaced by the Sherwood number, and accordingly the Prandtl by the Schmidt number. The equation is valid for 1 ≤ Re ≤ 105 and for 0.7 < Sc < 7 · 104 . Quite recently Sparrow et al. [3.16] communicated an equation valid for Prandtl numbers of the order of 1 for gases and the higher Prandtl numbers

356

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Table 3.1: Constants and exponents in equation (3.210) Re 1 to 40 3

40 to 10

10 to 2 · 10 3

5

2 · 105 to 107

c

m

n

0.76

0.4

0.37

0.52

0.5

0.37

0.26

0.6

0.37

0.023

0.8

0.4

Heating the ﬂuid:

p=0.25

Cooling the ﬂuid: p=0.20

for liquids. It is % & N um = 0,25 + 0.4 Re1/2 + 0.06 Re2/3 P r0.37 (η/ηw )1/4 ,

(3.211a)

in which the mean Nusselt and the Reynolds number are formed with the tube diameter. All of the ﬂuid properties except ηW are to be evaluated with the free stream temperature ϑ∞; ηW is to be evaluated with the wall temperature. Heat transfer correlations for non-circular cylinders and spheres in crossﬂow are dealt with by Sparrow et al. [3.16]. Example 3.10: A copper cylinder of diameter 10 mm and 1 m length has an initial temperature of ϑα = 423.15 K = 150 ◦ C. Air at ϑ∞ = 298.15 K = 25 ◦ C then ﬂows with velocity w∞ = 10 m/s across the cylinder. After what period of time has the cylinder been cooled to ϑω = 308.15 K = 35 ◦ C? Given properties: thermal conductivity of the cylinder λc = 399 W/Km, density = 8933 kg/m3 , speciﬁc heat capacity c = 0.387 kJ/kgK, thermal conductivity of the air λA = 26.25 · 10−3 W/Km, Prandtl number P rA (25 ◦ C) = 0.707, P rA (35 ◦ C) = 0.706, P rA (92.5 ◦ C) = 0.701, kinematic viscosity νA (25 ◦ C) = 157.9 · 10−7 m2 /s. In the solution of this problem we ﬁrst have to show that the thermal resistance of the cylinder is negligible compared to that of the air, and therefore that the temperature of the cylinder is only a function of time. The thermal resistance of the air is yielded from the heat transfer coeﬃcients. These are found from (3.210). The mean wall temperature is ϑO = (150 + 35) /2 ◦ C = 92.5 ◦ C, the mean ﬂuid temperature ϑ = (25 + 92.5) /2 ◦ C = 58.7 ◦ C; from Table B.1 we ﬁnd νA (58.7 ◦ C) = 191 · 10−7 m2 /s and P r = 0.703. The Reynolds number of the air ﬂowing over the cylinder is w∞ d 10 m/s · 10 · 10−3 m Re = = = 5236 ν 191 · 10−7 m2 /s With the values from Table 3.1, the average Nusselt number is N um = 0.26 Re0.6 P r 0.37

Pr P r0

0.25

with P r 0 = P rA (92.5 ◦ C) = 0.701 .

3.7 External forced ﬂow

This gives

N um = 0.26 · 52360.6 · 0.7030.37

0.703 0.701

357

0.25 = 38.91

λ 26.25 · 10−3 W/Km = 38.91 = 102.1 W/m2 K d 10 · 10−3 m The Biot number is decisive for the ratio of the thermal resistance of the cylinder to that of the air αm d 102.1 W/m2 K · 10 · 10−3 m Bi = = = 2.56 · 10−3 . λc 399 W/Km αm = N um

This is well below the limit of Bi = 0.1 given in section 2.3.5.2. So the thermal resistance of the cylinder is negligible compared to that of the air. This allows us to associate a single temperature that only changes with time to the cylinder. The cooling time of the cylinder is yielded from (2.199) to be t=

t=

cV ϑα − ϑA ln αm A ϑω − ϑA

with

V d2 π 1 d = L = A 4 dπL 4

8933 kg/m3 · 387 J/kgK · 10 · 10−3 m 150 − 25 ln = 213.8 s = 3.56 min . 102.1 W/m2 K · 4 35 − 25

With (3.211) we ﬁnd αm = 128 W/m2 K and t = 2.84 min; (3.211a) delivers almost the same values αm = 126.7 W/m2 K and t = 2.87 min.

3.7.3

Tube bundles in crossﬂow

In the following, the heat transfer and pressure drop in a tube bundle in crossﬂow will be investigated. The individual tubes in the bundle are either in alignment with each other or in a staggered arrangement, according to Fig. 3.25.

Fig. 3.25: Tube bundle in crossﬂow. a aligned tube arrangement; b staggered tube arrangement with the smallest cross section perpendicular to the initial ﬂow direction; c staggered tube arrangement with the smallest cross section in the diagonal

The heat transfer is greater in a staggered arrangement at the same Reynolds number. However this is paid for with a larger pressure drop. With reference to Fig. 3.25a to c, the separation between the tube centres perpendicular to the ﬂow direction is known as transverse pitch sq , tube separation in the ﬂow direction as

358

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

longitudinal pitch sl , and the tube separation in the diagonal direction as stagger sv . The quotient sq /d is called the transverse pitch ratio, sl /d the longitudinal pitch ratio, and sv /d the staggered pitch. The ﬂow around and therefore the heat transfer around an individual tube within the bundle is inﬂuenced by the detachment of the boundary layer and the vortices from the previous tubes. The heat transfer on a tube in the ﬁrst row is roughly the same as that on a single cylinder with a ﬂuid in crossﬂow, provided the transverse pitch between the tubes is not too narrow. Further downstream the heat transfer coeﬃcient increases because the previous tubes act as turbulence generators for those which follow. From the fourth or ﬁfth row onwards the ﬂow pattern hardly changes and the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient of the tubes approach a constant end value. As a result of this the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient over all the tubes reaches for an end value, independent of the row number. It is roughly constant from about the tenth row onwards. This is illustrated in Fig. 3.26, in which the ratio F of the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient αm(zR ) up to row zR with the end value αm (zR → ∞) = αm∞ is plotted against the row number zR . Fig. 3.26: Inﬂuence of the tube row number zR on the heat transfer in bundles of smooth tubes from [3.16]. a) aligned, b) staggered tube arrangement. The broken lines for Re > 103 , full lines for 102 < Re < 103

The results for the mean heat transfer coeﬃcients published up until now have been described by various authors [3.17] to [3.21] through correlations. A simple equation, which represents the results for a row of single tubes and for tube bundles stems from Gnielinski [3.18]. According to this, we ﬁrst determine the heat transfer coeﬃcient of a single tube in crossﬂow from (3.211) together with (3.196) and (3.207). In these equations the Reynolds number is formed with the average velocity wm = w/ε, Re = wm l/ν, l = dπ/2. w is the velocity over the entire cross section, ε is the void fraction. It depends on the transverse pitch ratio a = sq /d and the longitudinal pitch ratio b = sl /d according to ε = 1 − π/(4a) for b ≥ 1 and ε = 1 − π/(4ab) for b < 1. The Nusselt number N um from (3.211) is to be multiplied with a geometric factor fA . With this we obtain the Nusselt number N uB =

αB l = fA N um λ

(3.212)

with l = dπ/2, valid in the range 10 < Re < 106 and 0.6 < P r < 103 . For tube rows aligned in the direction of ﬂow we have & % fA = 1 + 0.7(b/a − 0.3)/ ε3/2 (b/a + 0.7)2 (3.212a)

3.7 External forced ﬂow

359

and for staggered tube rows fA = 1 + 2/3 b

(3.212b)

Equation (3.212a) is experimentally conﬁrmed for b ≥ 1.2; for b < 1.2 the experiments lead to b/a ≥ 1. The Nusselt number N uB of bundles with less than ten rows is to be multiplied with a factor 1 + (zR − 1) fA zR taking into account the increase of the heat transfer coeﬃcient with the number zR of rows according to Fig. 3.26. The heat transfer in a ﬁnned tube bundle is calculated using similar equations. For this we suggest [3.22] in the literature. In the calculation of the heat transferred in a tube bundle, we have to consider that the ﬂuid temperature between the inlet and outlet can signiﬁcantly change. The heat ﬂow from a tube surface element dA to the ﬂuid amounts to dQ˙ = α dA(ϑ0 − ϑF ) = M˙ cp dϑF , where ϑF is the mean ﬂuid temperature in a cross section between the tubes. This then gives α dϑF dA = . ˙ ϑ0 − ϑF M cp By integrating between the inlet cross section i, where the mean ﬂuid temperature is ϑi , and the outlet (exit) cross section e with a mean ﬂuid temperature ϑe we obtain e 1 αm A0 ϑ0 − ϑi α dA = = ln . c˙p ϑ0 − ϑe M˙ cp i

Here αm is the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient and A0 is the total tube surface area. With that the heat ﬂow amounts to ϑ0 − ϑi Q˙ = M˙ cp (ϑe − ϑi ) = αm A0 (ϑi − ϑe )/ ln ϑ0 − ϑe or Q˙ = αm A0 Δϑlog

(3.213)

with the logarithmic mean temperature diﬀerence Δϑlog = (ϑe − ϑi )/ ln

ϑ0 − ϑi . ϑ0 − ϑ e

(3.214)

360

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Example 3.11: Atmospheric air (p = 0.1 MPa) is to be heated in a tube bundle heat exchanger from 10 ◦ C to 30 ◦ C. The exchanger consists of 4 neighbouring rows and zR rows of tubes aligned one behind the other. The outer diameter of the tubes is 25 mm, their length 1.5 m, the longitudinal pitch is the same as the transverse pitch: sl /d = sq /d = 2. The wall temperature of the tubes is 80 ◦ C with an initial velocity of the air of 4 m/s. Calculate the required number zR of tube rows. The following properties are given: Air at ϑm = 20 ◦ C: viscosity ν = 15.32 · 10−6 m2 /s, thermal conductivity λ = 0.0259 W/Km, density = 1.189 kg/m3 , speciﬁc heat capacity cp = 1.006 kJ/kgK, Prandtl number P r = 0.708. The velocity wn in the narrowest cross section is yielded from the mass balance w∞ 4 sq = wn (4 sq − 4 d) to

w n = w∞

sq m 2d =4 = 8 m/s ; sq − d s 2d−d

Because of a = b = 2 the void fraction is ε = 1 − π (4 · 2) = 0.607 and the average velocity wm = w/ε = 4(m/s)/0.607 = 6.587 m/s . With this we obtain the Reynolds number Re = w (dπ/2)/ν = 1.69 · 104 . The mean Nusselt number N um,lam follows from (3.196a) N um,lam = 76.34 , and for turbulent ﬂow we obtain from (3.207) N um,turb = 77.97 . The geometric factor (3.212a) is fA = 1 +

0.7 (1 − 0.3) = 1.359 . 0.6073/2 (1 + 0.7)2

With this we obtain the Nusselt number of the bundle from (3.212) N uB = 1.359 · 109.4 = 148.7 , and the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient of the bundle αB = 98.1 W/(m2 K). The heat ﬂow is Q˙ = M˙ cp (ϑi − ϑe ) = w∞ 4 sq d L cp (ϑi − ϑe ) = 28.7 kW . According to (3.212) we have Q˙ = αB 4 zR d π L Δ ϑm , with Δϑm = Δϑlog from (3.214). We have Δϑm = 59.44 K, and hence ˙ zR = Q/(α B 4dπLΔϑm ) = 10.4 . The chosen number of tube rows is zR = 11.

3.7 External forced ﬂow

3.7.4

361

Some empirical equations for heat and mass transfer in external forced ﬂow

As the previous illustrations showed, the heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients for simple ﬂows over a body, such as those over ﬂat or slightly curved plates, can be calculated exactly using the boundary layer equations. In ﬂows where detachment occurs, for example around cylinders, spheres or other bodies, the heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients are very diﬃcult if not impossible to calculate and so can only be determined by experiments. In terms of practical applications the calculated or measured results have been described by empirical correlations of the type N u = f (Re, P r), some of which have already been discussed. These are summarised in the following along with some of the more frequently used correlations. All the correlations are also valid for mass transfer. This merely requires the Nusselt to be replaced by the Sherwood number and the Prandtl by the Schmidt number.

1. Longitudinal ﬂow along a ﬂat plate, heated or cooled from the leading edge onwards Correlation

Range of validity

N ux = √1 (Rex P r)1/2 π

Pr → ∞

lam. ﬂow

1/2

0.5 ≤ P r ≤ 1000

Rex ≤ 5 · 105

N ux = 0.339 Rex P r1/3

1/2

Pr → ∞

N um = 0.664 Re1/2 P r1/3

0.5 ≤ P r ≤ 1000

N ux = 0.332 Rex P r1/3

N um =

0.037 Re0.8 P r 1 + 2.443 Re−0.1 (P r2/3 − 1)

0.6 ≤ P r ≤ 2000

turb. ﬂow: 5 · 105 < Re < 107

Fig. 3.27: Longitudinal ﬂow over a ﬂat plate, heated from its leading edge

362

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

2. Longitudinal ﬂow over a ﬂat plate, heated or cooled from point x0 1/2

N ux =

Rex $1/3 ϕ1 (P r) , √ # π 1 − (x0 /x)3/4

0 ≤ P r ≤ 1000 ,

Rex ≤ 5 · 105

with ϕ1 (P r) as under 1.

Fig. 3.28: Longitudinal ﬂow over a ﬂat plate, heated or cooled from the point x0

3. Cylinder in crossﬂow N um = 0.3 + (N um, lam 2 + N um, turb 2 )1/2 with

2 N um, lam = 2N u(x = L) = √ Rex1/2 ϕ1 (P r) π

with ϕ1 (P r) as under 1 and N um, turb =

0.037 Re0.8 P r 1 + 2.443 Re−0.1 (P r2/3 − 1)

10 < Re < 107 ,

0.6 < P r < 1 000 .

Nusselt and Reynolds number are formed with the length L = dπ/2 over which the ﬂuid ﬂows. All ﬂuid properties are to be evaluated at the arithmetic mean between inlet and outlet temperature.

Fig. 3.29: Cylinder in crossﬂow

4. Cylinder of arbitrary proﬁle in crossﬂow The equation is the same as that for a cylinder in crossﬂow, the Nusselt and Reynolds numbers are formed with the length over which the ﬂuid ﬂows, in the example below L = a + b.

3.7 External forced ﬂow

363

Fig. 3.30: Cylinder of arbitrary proﬁle in crossﬂow

5. Flow over a sphere The terms are the same as for a cylinder in crossﬂow &1/2 % N um = 2 + N u2m, lam + N u2m, turb N um, lam = 0.664 Re1/2 P r1/3 N um, turb =

0.037Re0.8 P r 1 + 2.443Re−0.1 (P r2/3 − 1) w∞ d ν 1 ≤ Re ≤ 106

αm d ; λ 0.7 < P r < 600

Re =

N um =

In the case of mass transfer, N um is replaced by Shm and P r by Sc, this is valid for the range 0.7 < Sc < 70000. 6. Free falling liquid droplets

N um = 2 + 0.6 Re

1/2

Pr

1/3

25

x −0.7 d

.

The Nusselt and Reynolds numbers are formed with the droplet diameter d; x is the distance over which the droplet falls. With 10 ≤ x/d ≤ 600 and 3 mm ≤ d ≤ 6 mm. 7. Bundles of smooth tubes We ﬁrst determine from (3.211) with (3.196a) for N um,lam and (3.207) for N um,turb the mean Nusselt number N um of a single tube in crossﬂow. The Reynolds number being Re = wm l/ν, l = dπ/2 and wm = w/ε. w is the initial velocity and ε the void fraction ε = 1 − π/(4a) for b ≥ 1 and ε = 1 − π/(4ab) for b < 1. a = sq /d is the transverse pitch ratio and b = sl /d the longitudinal pitch ratio. The mean Nusselt number of the bundle is N uB =

αB l = fA N um λ

with the geometric factor of tube rows aligned in ﬂow direction fA = 1 +

0.7 (b/a − 0.3) ε3/2 (b/a + 0.7)2

364

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

and

2 3b for staggered tube rows. The equation for N uB is valid in the range 10 < Re < 106 and 0.6 < P r < 103 . For bundles with less than ten rows N uB is to be multiplied with a factor 1 + (zR − 1) fA /zR , where zR is the number of rows in staggered arrangement. fA = 1 +

3.8

Internal forced ﬂow

Heat and mass transfer apparatus normally consist of channels, frequently tubes, in which a ﬂuid is heated, cooled or changes its composition. While the boundary layers in ﬂow over bodies, for example over a ﬂat plate, can develop freely without inﬂuence from neighbouring restrictions, in channels it is completely enclosed and so the boundary layer cannot develop freely. In the following the ﬂow, and then the heat and mass transfer in tubes will be discussed. After this we will study ﬂow through packed and ﬂuidised beds.

3.8.1

Laminar ﬂow in circular tubes

We will consider a ﬂuid in laminar ﬂow that enters a circular tube with constant velocity, Fig. 3.31. Friction causes the liquid adjacent to the wall to decelerate. A boundary layer develops downstream. As the same amount ﬂows through every cross section, the core ﬂow must accelerate in the ﬂow direction. The driving force is the pressure drop in the ﬂow direction. As the boundary layer grows asymptotically to the axis of the tube, the velocity proﬁle asymptotically approaches a parabolic end proﬁle, the so-called Poiseuille parabola. The deviation from this is already negligible after a ﬁnite distance. The type of ﬂow where the velocity proﬁle no longer changes is known as hydrodynamic, fully developed ﬂow. The distance from the inlet until the deviation from the asymptotic end value is negligible is known as the hydrodynamic entry-length. It can be calculated exactly [3.23] for the laminar tubular ﬂow sketched in Fig. 3.31 and is xe ≈ 0.056 Re d ,

(3.215)

when the velocity at the tube axis has a deviation of 1 % from the value for Poiseuille ﬂow. Just as for a ﬂat plate, whether the ﬂow is laminar or turbulent is determined by the Reynolds number. As we have already explained, a ﬂow with a Reynolds number below Re = wmd/ν = 2300 is always laminar and above Re = 4000 it

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

365

is turbulent. Turbulent ﬂows are hydrodynamically fully developed after a short distance. The entry-length lies in the range [3.24] <

10 ∼

xe < ∼ 60 . d

(3.216)

For calculation of the heat and mass transfer it is suﬃcient to consider turbulent ﬂow to be hydrodynamically fully developed after an entry-length of xe /d ≈ 10. Then the small deviations from the end value of the velocity proﬁle hardly aﬀect the heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients.

Fig. 3.31: Velocity proﬁle and boundary layer in laminar, tubular ﬂow

3.8.1.1

Hydrodynamic, fully developed, laminar ﬂow

In the calculation of the velocity proﬁle of a hydrodynamic, fully developed, laminar ﬂow we will presume the ﬂow to be incompressible and all properties to be constant. The velocity proﬁle of a fully developed, tubular ﬂow is only dependent on the radius r, wx = wx (r) and wy = 0. Therefore the acceleration term dwj /dt in the Navier-Stokes equation (3.59) disappears; body forces are not present, so kj = 0. An equilibrium develops between the pressure and friction forces. Balancing the forces on an annular ﬂuid element, Fig. 3.32, gives dp 2rπ dr = 0 . −τr 2rπ dx + τr+ dr 2(r + dr)π dx + p 2rπ dr − p + dx This simpliﬁes, with τr+dr = τr + ( dτr / dr) dr to τr + r or

dτr dp −r =0 dr dx

dp 1 d (rτr ) = . r dr dx

With Newton’s law τr = η

dwx dr

366

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

and under the assumption of constant viscosity, we obtain dwx dp η d r = . r dr dr dx

(3.217)

The axial pressure drop dp/dx is independent of the radial coordinate r; it can also not be a function of the length x, as the left hand side of (3.217) only depends on the coordinate r. So that both sides agree, each must be constant. This means that the pressure can only change proportionally to the length x. Taking into account (dwx /dr)r=0 = 0 integration yields r

1 dp r2 dwx = , dr η dx 2

from which, under consideration of wx (r = R) = 0, and a further integration we obtain the velocity proﬁle

r 2 1 dp 2 wx (r) = − R 1− . (3.218) 4η dx R The mean velocity over a cross section is found from this to be 1 wm = 2 R π

R wx (r) 2rπ dr = −

R2 dp . 8η dx

(3.219)

0

The velocity proﬁle of a fully developed ﬂow is therefore

r 2 wx (r) . =2 1− wm R

(3.220)

Hydrodynamic, fully developed, tubular ﬂows were ﬁrst studied by Hagen and Poiseuille. The ﬂow is therefore also called Hagen-Poiseuille ﬂow. We can see from (3.220), that the velocity at the tube axis is twice the mean velocity, wx (r = 0) = 2wm . From (3.219) we get the following for the pressure drop −

dp 8ηwm , = dx R2

Fig. 3.32: Force balance on a ring element in hydrodynamic, fully developed, laminar ﬂow

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

367

from which, after introduction of the Reynolds number Re = wm d/ν and with −dp/dx = const = Δp/L, we obtain the friction factor ζ=

3.8.1.2

Δp 64 = . 2 (L/d) wm /2 Re

(3.221)

Thermal, fully developed, laminar ﬂow

When a ﬂuid at constant temperature ϑα enters, for example, a circular tube with an inner wall temperature ϑ0 = ϑα , it will be either heated up or cooled down. A thermal boundary layer develops, which increases downstream possibly up to the tube axis. The thickness of the thermal boundary layer grows to d/2. The heat transfer coeﬃcient reaches it lowest value at this point α ∼ λ/(d/2), or expressing it in a diﬀerent manner N u = αd/λ ∼ 2: The downstream Nusselt number approaches a ﬁnal value, which according to our rough estimations has a magnitude of 2. A corresponding value exists for the Sherwood number in mass transfer. The following explanations for heat transfer can be applied accordingly to mass transfer. A ﬂow is thermally fully developed when the Nusselt number has reached a value within a deviation of say 1 % of the end value. The local heat transfer coeﬃcient is deﬁned by α :=

q˙0 , ϑ0 − ϑ F

(3.222)

where ϑF is the adiabatic mixing temperature according to (1.30), in the case being considered 1 ϑF = wx ϑ dAq . M˙ Aq

In tubular ﬂow, M˙ = wm R2π, dAq = 2rπ dr and therefore the adiabatic mixing temperature, under the assumption = const, is 2 ϑF = wm R2

R wx ϑr dr .

(3.223)

0

For the temperature proﬁle for a thermal fully developed ﬂow, from N u = const =

αd d q˙0 −λ(∂ϑ/∂r)R d = = λ ϑ0 − ϑF λ ϑ0 − ϑF λ

follows the relationship (∂ϑ/∂r)R = const . (3.224) ϑ0 − ϑF This says that the temperature increase at the wall in a thermal fully developed ﬂow changes with the length x in the same way as the diﬀerence between the wall

368

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

and the adiabatic mixing temperature. The temperature proﬁle that satisﬁes this condition is of the general form ϑ(x, r/R) = (ϑ0 − ϑF ) f1 (r/R) + f2 (x) , which can be ascertained by inserting it into (3.224). At the wall ϑ(x, 1) = ϑ0 = (ϑ0 − ϑF ) f1 (1) + f2(x) . Subtraction of both equations yields with the abbreviation r + = r/R: ϑ0 − ϑ(x, r+ ) = (ϑ0 − ϑF ) [f1 (1) − f1 (r+ )] or ϑ0 − ϑ(x, r+ ) = (ϑ0 − ϑF ) f (r+ ) .

(3.225)

This relationship serves in many publications as the deﬁnition of a thermally fully developed ﬂow. It is, as we have already seen, a result of the fact that the heat transfer coeﬃcient reaches its asymptotic, constant end value downstream. We will now look at examples of two particular thermally, fully developed ﬂows, namely that at constant heat ﬂux q˙0 = const at the wall, and that at constant wall temperature ϑ0 = const. a) In the case of constant heat ﬂux, it follows with ϑ0 − ϑF =

q˙0 α

from (3.225) that q˙0 f (r+ ) . α Here, the left hand side is independent of the length x, and so it holds that ϑ0 − ϑ(x, r+ ) =

dϑ0 ∂ϑ(x, r+ ) = . dx ∂x The temperature at any arbitrary point r+ changes in the same way with the length x as the wall temperature. Furthermore, in (3.224) because of q˙0 = const, we also have (∂ϑ/∂r)R = const and therefore ϑ0 − ϑF = const. It follows from this that the adiabatic mixing temperature changes in the same way as the wall temperature with the length dϑF dϑ0 = . dx dx Therefore we have ∂ϑ(x, r+ ) dϑ0 dϑF q˙0 2Rπ = const . = = = ∂x dx dx M˙ cp

(3.226)

At a suﬃcient distance downstream all the temperatures change linearly with the length, Fig. 3.33a.

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

369

Fig. 3.33: Dependence of the wall temperature ϑ0 (x1 ) and adiabatic mixing temperature ϑF (x1 ) on the length x in laminar tubular ﬂow, a q˙0 = const; b ϑ0 = const

b) In the case of constant wall temperature, the energy balance α 2Rπ dx [ϑ0 − ϑF (x)] = M˙ cp dϑF yields the relationship αdπ dϑF = dx ϑ0 − ϑF (x) M˙ cp which can be integrated as the wall temperature is constant. With ϑF (x = 0) = ϑα we obtain ϑ0 − ϑF (x) αm dπ = exp − x , ϑ0 − ϑα M˙ cp

(3.227)

where αm is the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient over the length x. The diﬀerence between the wall temperature and the adiabatic mixing temperature decreases exponentially with the length x, Fig. 3.33b. According to (3.225) ∂ϑ(x, r+ ) dϑF = f (r+ ) ∂x dx with f (r+ ) =

(3.228)

ϑ0 − ϑ . ϑ0 − ϑF

The temperature change in the direction of ﬂow now depends on the radial coordinate as well.

3.8.1.3

Heat transfer coeﬃcients in thermally fully developed, laminar ﬂow

In the following we will show how heat transfer coeﬃcients are calculated for thermally fully developed, laminar ﬂow. In a corresponding manner the mass transfer coeﬃcients with regard to fully developed concentration proﬁle can be obtained. In order to show this fundamentally we will consider tubular ﬂow. The explanations can easily be transferred to cover other types of channel ﬂow.

370

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

When we neglect the dissipation and the thermal conduction in the direction x of ﬂow and under the assumption that the properties of the materials are temperature independent, the energy balance in cylindrical coordinates x, r is ∂ϑ ∂ϑ ∂ϑ 1 ∂ wx r . (3.229) + wr =a ∂x ∂r r ∂r ∂r In fully developed ﬂow we have wr = 0, so that the second term on the left hand side drops out. The velocity proﬁle wx (r) is given by the Hagen-Poiseuille parabola (3.220). a) We will discuss the case of constant heat ﬂux at the wall ﬁrst. Then, according to (3.226) ∂ϑ ∂ϑF = = const , ∂x ∂x and the energy equation is transformed into

r 2 dϑ dϑ 1 d F r . =a 2wm 1 − R dx r dr dr Separating the variables gives, after integration, the general solution of the diﬀerential equation 2wm dϑF r2 r4 ϑ(x, r) = − + c1 ln r + c2 . a dx 4 16 R2 This still has to satisfy the boundary conditions ϑ(x, r = R) = ϑ0(x) . In addition, the temperature in the tube axis ϑ(x, r = 0) has to be ﬁnite, which is only possible if c1 = 0. This gives a temperature proﬁle

2wm R2 dϑF 3 1 r 4 1 r 2 . (3.230) ϑ(x, r) = ϑ0(x) − − + a dx 16 16 R 4 R The adiabatic mixing temperature (3.223) is found by inserting the temperature proﬁle into

R r 2 2 ϑF (x) = 1 − ϑ(x, r) r dr 2w m wm R2 R r=0

to give ϑF (x) = ϑ0 (x) −

11 wm R2 dϑF . 48 a dx

So, with (3.226) 11 q˙0 d . 48 λ On the other hand the heat transfer coeﬃcient is deﬁned by q˙0 = α(ϑ0 (x) −ϑF (x)) and therefore ϑ0 (x) − ϑF (x) =

αd 48 = Nu = = 4.3636 . λ 11

(3.231)

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

371

b) In the case of constant wall temperature the energy balance (3.229) is once again valid, into which wr = 0 for fully developed ﬂow has to be inserted. With the velocity proﬁle (3.220) for Hagen-Poiseuille ﬂow, and taking (3.228) into account, we obtain

r 2 dϑ ϑ − ϑ 1 ∂ ∂ϑ F 0 2wm 1 − =a r . (3.232) R dx ϑ0 − ϑF r ∂r ∂r This equation can be further simpliﬁed with the dimensionless temperature ϑ0 − ϑ ϑ0 − ϑ F and with the energy balance ϑ+ :=

dϑ+ 1 ∂ϑ =− dr ϑ0 − ϑF ∂r

,

α dπ dx (ϑ0 − ϑF ) = M˙ cp dϑF which provides us with the following relationship αdπ 4α 1 dϑF = = . ˙ w d c ϑ − ϑ M cp m p 0 F dx With this (3.232) is transformed into 1 d − 2N u (1 − r ) ϑ = + + r dr +2

+

+ + dϑ r dr+

(3.233)

with the Nusselt number N u = αd/λ and r+ := r/R. The solution has to satisfy the boundary conditions ϑ+ (r+ = 1) = 0. The equation (3.233) cannot be solved analytically. It is solved using a series expansion ϑ+ =

∞

C2n r+2n .

n=0

By inserting this into (3.233) and comparing terms of equal powers in r+ we ﬁnd that the coeﬃcients are given by Nu N u C2n−4 C2n−2 C2 C2n =− = 2 − and n≥2 . C0 2 C0 2n C0 C0 This means that all coeﬃcients can be expressed in terms of the Nusselt number. In order to fulﬁll the boundary condition ϑ+ (r+ = 1) = 0, the following equation has to be fulﬁlled ∞ C2n =0 , (3.234) C0 n=0 and this is only possible for certain values of the Nusselt number. These values can be found, for example, by estimating the Nusselt number, then calculating the coeﬃcients with the recursive formula given above and then checking whether the condition (3.234) has been satisﬁed. In this way we ﬁnd that N u = 3.6568 .

372

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Table 3.2: Nusselt numbers N u = αdh/λ in thermal, fully developed, laminar ﬂow and resis 2 tance factors ζ = Δp/ (L/dh ) (wm /2) in channels with diﬀerent cross sections. N uT is the Nusselt number at constant wall temperature, N uq that at constant heat ﬂux at the wall and Re = wm dh /ν is the Reynolds number. Channel

dh

N uT

N uq

ζRe

Circular tube Diameter d

d

3.657

4.364

64

Parallel plates Plate distance 2b

4b

7.541

8.235

96

Square Side length a

a

2.976

3.091

56.91

Rectangle Side ratio b/a = 1/2

4b/3

3.391

3.017

62.19

Equilateral triangle Side length a

√ a/ 3

2.49

1.892

53.33

Ellipse Large semiaxis a Small semiaxis b b/a = 1/2

πb/1.2111

3.742

3.804

84.11

A corresponding calculation for channels with diﬀerent cross sections leads to the values presented in Table 3.2. These represent the lower limits for the Nusselt number and it cannot fall below these values even in a ﬂow that is not thermally fully developed. The resistance factors are also exhibited in Table 3.2 2 L wm , (3.235) ζ = Δp/ dh 2 and these are formed with the hydraulic diameter dh = 4A/U ,

(3.236)

where A is the cross sectional area of the channel and U is its perimeter. Further end values of the Nusselt number can be found in Kakaˇc [3.25] among others. 3.8.1.4

The thermal entry ﬂow with fully developed velocity proﬁle

In a laminar tubular ﬂow the velocity proﬁle shall be fully developed and can therefore be described by Hagen-Poiseuille’s law (3.220). In contrast the temperature proﬁle is not fully developed. This could be imagined as a heated tube that has an unheated length, long enough to allow the velocity proﬁle to become fully developed before the ﬂuid enters the heated section. The velocity proﬁle forms much faster then the temperature proﬁle if the Prandtl number of the ﬂuid is very

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

373

large, P r → ∞, as in the case of highly viscous oils. The high viscosity means that the friction in the ﬂuid propagates fast, whilst the low thermal diﬀusivity only permits a slow change in the temperature, so the velocity proﬁle rapidly reaches its end value in comparison with the temperature proﬁle that only changes slowly along the ﬂow path. We presume negligible axial heat conduction, constant wall temperature ϑ0 and a constant temperature ϑα of the ﬂuid at the inlet of the tube. All material properties are temperature independent. This problem was ﬁrst dealt with by Graetz (1850–1891) in 1883 [3.26], later in 1910 by Nusselt (1882–1957) [3.27] and by many other authors. It is also known as a Graetz or Graetz-Nusselt problem. It is described by the energy equation (3.229), in which, according to the suppositions made, the radial velocity component disappears, wr = 0, and the axial velocity is that of a Hagen-Poiseuille ﬂow (3.220). With that the energy equation becomes

r 2 ∂ϑ ∂ϑ 1 ∂ 2wm 1 − r (3.237) =a R ∂x r ∂r ∂r or after the introduction of dimensionless quantities r+ :=

r R

,

x+ :=

x dPe

with P e = ReP r =

wm d a

and

ϑ − ϑ0 : ϑα − ϑ 0 + & ∂ϑ+ 1 ∂ 1 % + ∂ϑ r . (3.238) = 1 − r+2 2 ∂x+ r+ ∂r+ ∂r+ The temperature proﬁle should satisfy the following boundary conditions ϑ+ :=

ϑ+ (x+ , r+ = 1) = 0

(3.239)

and ϑ+ (x+ = 0, r+ ) = 1 . +

+

(3.240) +

To allow for solution, the temperature proﬁle ϑ (x , r ) is written as the product of two functions ϑ+ (x+ , r+ ) = ϕ(x+ ) ψ(r+ ) , of which one only depends on the length x+ and the other only depends on the radial coordinate r+ . With this statement, the partial diﬀerential equation (3.238) can be converted into two ordinary diﬀerential equations ϕ + 2β 2 ϕ = 0 and ψ +

1 2 ψ + β 2(1 − r+ ) ψ = 0 . r+

(3.241)

(3.242)

374

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

The general solution of (3.241) is ϕ = c exp{−2β 2 x+ } , where c and β 2 are arbitrary constants. Equation (3.242) cannot be solved explicitly. A particular solution can be found using the series ψ=

∞

C2n r+

2n

.

n=0

Inserting this into (3.242) and comparing the coeﬃcients of equal powers of r+ yields β2 C2 =− 2 C0 2 and for n ≥ 2 the recursive formula for the coeﬃcients β2 C2n C2n−4 C2n−2 = − . C0 (2n)2 C0 C0 According to this the coeﬃcients C2n /C0 are still dependent on the quantity β. This has to be determined such that the boundary condition ψ(r+ = 1) = 0 or 1+

∞ C2n n=1

C0

=0

is satisﬁed. In this way we obtain a power series for β, the solution of which delivers an inﬁnite number of values, the so-called eigenvalues βi , i = 1, 2, . . . ∞. There are therefore an inﬁnite number of particular solutions +

+

ψi (r ) = f (βi , r ) =

∞

C2n (βi ) r+

2n

,

n=0

and the general solution is of the form ϑ+ =

∞

an exp{−2βn2 x+ } ψn (r+ ) .

(3.243)

n=0

It still has to satisfy the boundary condition ϑ+ (x+ = 0, r+ ) = 1 1=

∞ n=0

an ψn (r+ ) .

(3.244)

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

375

The constants an are obtained, see also Appendix A 7 for this, as 1 2

ψn(r+ )(1 − r+ ) r+ dr+ an =

0

.

1

(3.245)

2

ψn2 (r+ )(1 − r+ ) r+ dr+ 0

The adiabatic mixing temperature follows from ϑF − ϑ0 = ϑ+ F = 2 ϑα − ϑ0

1 0

wx + + + ϑ r dr = 4 wm

1

2

(1 − r+ ) ϑ+ r+ dr+ , 0

which produces, after inserting the temperature proﬁle (3.243) and integrating, ϑ+ F =

∞

Bn exp{−2βn2 x+ } .

(3.246)

n=0

The constants Bn , the eigenvalues βn and the constants an of (3.245) of the ﬁrst ﬁve terms of the series are presented in the following Table 3.3, according to calculations by [3.28]. Table 3.3: Constants Bn , eigenvalues βn according to Brown [3.28] and constants an n

Bn

βn

an

0

0.81905

2.70436

1.04400

1

0.09753

6.67903

-0.57002

2

0.03250

10.67338

0.41632

3

0.01544

14.67108

-0.33648

4

0.00879

18.66987

0.28639

The local Nusselt number is obtained from the adiabatic mixing temperature with the help of the energy balance α2Rπ dx(ϑ0 − ϑF ) = M˙ cp dϑF = wm R2 π cp dϑF to be α=

wm dcp 1 dϑF 4 ϑ0 − ϑF dx

or Nu =

αd 1 d ln ϑ+ F . =− λ 4 dx+

(3.247)

376

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

The mean Nusselt number comes from the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient L 1 α dx αm = L 0

as αm d 1 N um = = + λ X

X + N u dx+ 0

and with X + := L/(d P e) 1 + ln ϑ+ (3.248) F (X ) . 4X + A plot of the mean Nusselt number is shown in Fig. 3.35; it is identical to the curve for P r → ∞. For suﬃciently large values of the length X + → ∞ the adiabatic mixing temperature (3.246) may be calculated using only the ﬁrst term of the series. The mean Nusselt number according to (3.248) is then transformed into % & 1 N um = − + ln B0 exp{−2β02 X + } 4X 2β02 1 ln B0 . = − 4 4X + With the values in Table 3.3 we obtain 0.0499 N um = 3.6568 + , valid for X + ≥ 0.05 . (3.249) X+ For X + → ∞, the known end value of 3.6568 for the Nusselt number for thermal fully developed ﬂow is obtained. The calculation of the Nusselt number for small values of the length X + = L/(d P e) requires many terms of the series for the adiabatic mixing temperature (3.246). Therefore the exact solution has been approximated by empirical equations. According to Stephan [3.29] through N um = −

N um =

3.657 0.0499 tanh X + + 1/3 2/3 + + X+ tanh(2.264 X + 1.7 X )

(3.250)

the exact values in the total region 0 ≤ X + ≤ ∞ will be reproduced with the largest error of 1 %. For large values X + ≥ 0.05 the equation is transformed into the asymptotic solution (3.249), whilst for small values X + ≤ 5 · 10−6 we obtain the so-called L´evˆeque solution [3.30] which is valid for short lengths N um = 1.615 (X + )−1/3 .

(3.251)

As we have already explained, in the calculation of the heat ﬂow, the temperature change in the ﬂuid between inlet and outlet has to taken into account. According to the previous explanations, (3.213), the heat ﬂow is Q˙ = αm A0 Δϑlog ,

(3.252)

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

377

where A0 is the surface of the tube over which heat is released and Δϑlog is the logarithmic mean temperature diﬀerence, cf. (3.214), Δϑlog = (ϑF − ϑα )/ ln

3.8.1.5

ϑ0 − ϑα . ϑ0 − ϑ F

(3.253)

Thermally and hydrodynamically developing ﬂow

In ﬂow that is neither hydrodynamically nor thermally fully developed the velocity and temperature proﬁles change along the ﬂow path. Fig. 3.34 shows qualitatively some velocity and temperature proﬁles, under the assumption that the ﬂuid ﬂows into the tube at constant velocity and temperature. The wall temperature of the tube is lower than the inlet temperature of the ﬂuid.

Fig. 3.34: Velocity and temperature proﬁles Pr=1 (0.1;10) of a hydrodynamically and thermally developing ﬂow

The calculation of the velocities and temperatures requires the solution of the continuity, momentum and energy equations. An explicit solution of the system of equations is not possible. A numerical solution has been communicated by Stephan [3.23] and later by several other authors see [3.25]. As a result the pressure drop Δp = pi − p between the pressure pi at the inlet and the pressure p at any tube cross section is obtained. It can be approximated by an empirical correlation [3.30] Δp = (1.25 + 64X) tanh(11.016X 1/2 ) 2 /2 wm

(3.254)

with X := L/(d Re) and Re := wm d/ν. The pressure drops calculated using this method deviate by less than 1.65 % from the values given by the numerical solution for the entire region 0 ≤ X ≤ ∞. In the same way as shown in the previous section, the heat transfer coeﬃcient and from that the mean Nusselt number N ume = αme d/λ (the index e stands for

378

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Fig. 3.35: Mean Nusselt numbers in laminar tubular ﬂow

entry ﬂow) can be obtained from the temperature proﬁle. The Nusselt number can be calculated from an empirical equation of the form N ume 1 = , N um tanh(2.432 P r1/6 X +1/6 )

(3.255)

where N um is the mean Nusselt number according to (3.250) for hydrodynamically fully developed ﬂow. Equation (3.255) is valid for 0.1 ≤ P r ≤ ∞ and 0 ≤ X + ≤ ∞. The deviation from the numerically calculated mean Nusselt numbers amounts to less than 5 % for 1 ≤ P r ≤ ∞, and increases for small Prandtl numbers 0.1 ≤ P r < 1 to around 10 %. Fig. 3.35 illustrates the pattern of the mean Nusselt number over the dimensionless length X + = L/(d P e). All the lines are arranged between those for P r = 0 and P r → ∞. P r = 0 in this case means that the viscosity vanishes, but the thermal conductivity is ﬁnite. As no friction forces act in the ﬂuid, the velocity at the inlet remains constant. This type of ﬂow is known as plug ﬂow. In the limiting case P r → ∞, because the viscosity is large in comparison to the thermal diﬀusivity, the ﬂow is hydrodynamically but not thermally fully developed. At the limit P r → ∞ equation (3.255) yields N ume /N um = 1. Vanishing Prandtl numbers P r = 0 can also mean that the thermal diffusivity is approaching inﬁnity, whilst the viscosity remains ﬁnite. Then the ﬂow is already thermally fully developed at the inlet, but not yet hydrodynamically fully developed. As the P´eclet number disappears, P e = wm d/a = 0, X + = L/(d P e) = ∞. The Nusselt number is equal to that for thermal fully developed ﬂow N um = 3.6568.

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

3.8.2

379

Turbulent ﬂow in circular tubes

An exclusively analytical treatment of heat and mass transfer in turbulent ﬂow in pipes fails because to date the turbulent shear stress τij = − wi wj , heat ﬂux ∗ q˙i = − cp wi T and also the turbulent diﬀusional ﬂux jAi = − wi ξA cannot be investigated in a purely theoretical manner. Rather, we have to rely on experiments. In contrast to laminar ﬂow, turbulent ﬂow in pipes is both hydrodynamically and thermally fully developed after only a short distance x/d ≥ 10 to 60, due to the intensive momentum exchange. This simpliﬁes the representation of the heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients by equations. Simple correlations, which are suﬃciently accurate for the description of fully developed turbulent ﬂow, can be found by using the analogy between momentum and heat or mass transfer, (3.199), StP r2/3 =

cf 2

(3.256)

with St = α/( cpwm ). The friction factor cf is linked to the resistance factor ζ because τ0 dπL = Δp (d2 π/4) , from which τ0 = Δp (d/4L) follows and cf =

τ0 1 Δp ζ = = . 2 /2) 2 /2) 4 (wm (L/d) (wm 4

Therefore StP r2/3 =

ζ . 8

(3.257)

(3.258)

With the resistance factor [3.32] ζ = 0.184 Re−1/5

valid for Re ≥ 104

for turbulent tubular ﬂow, we obtain the following for the Nusselt number N u = 0.023 Re4/5 P r1/3 .

(3.259)

A relationship that approximately agrees with equation (3.259) was recommended by Kraussold [3.33] in 1933, based upon his own experiments and those of others. The equation was ﬁrst communicated in the form presented here by McAdams [3.34] in 1942. It presumes small temperature diﬀerences between the wall and the ﬂuid, and is valid in the region 0.7 ≤ P r ≤ 160 ,

Re = wm d/ν ≥ 104

and L/d ≥ 100 .

All the material properties are taken at the adiabatic mixing temperature. With large diﬀerences in the temperature of the ﬂuid and the wall, the inﬂuence of

380

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

the viscosity that changes markedly with the temperature has to be taken into consideration. Hufschmidt and Burck [3.35] found, based on experiments by Sieder and Tate [3.36], that it is suﬃcient to multiply the right hand side of (3.259) with the factor (P r/P r0 )0.11 , where the Prandtl number P r is that at the mean temperature ϑm = (ϑi + ϑe )/2 and P r0 is that at the wall temperature ϑ0 . An equation that is also valid for large Reynolds numbers, was developed by Petukhov and Kirilov [3.37]. It has been modiﬁed by Gnielinski [3.38] so that in addition the region close to Re = 104 is correctly described. It reads 2/3 (ζ/8) ReP r d (3.260) Nu = 1+ L 1 + 12.7 ζ/8 (P r2/3 − 1) with the resistance factor ζ=

Δp 1 . = 2 /2) (L/d) (wm (0.78 ln Re − 1.5)2

(3.261)

It is valid in the region 104 ≤ Re ≤ 106

,

0.1 ≤ P r ≤ 1000 and L/d > 1 .

All material properties are formed with the mean temperature ϑm = (ϑi + ϑe )/2. The inﬂuence of a viscosity that changes starkly with temperature is once again accounted for by the factor (P r/P r0 )0.11 on the right hand side of (3.260), where P r is at the mean temperature ϑm , and P r0 is formed at the wall temperature. The equations (3.259) and (3.260) can also be used for the calculation of mass transfer coeﬃcients. As has already been explained, this merely requires the replacement of the Nusselt with the Sherwood number and the Prandtl with the Schmidt number.

3.8.3

Packed beds

A packed bed is understood to be the ordered or irregular arrangement of individual bodies of diﬀerent shapes. As an example of this Fig. 3.36 shows a packed bed of particles of diﬀerent sizes. A pipe register is also a packed bed in the sense of this deﬁnition. In ﬂuidised beds the particles are mixed up by a ﬂowing ﬂuid and kept in suspension. They then have properties similar to that of a ﬂuid. Chemical reactions, drying or other mass transfer processes take place rapidly in ﬂuidised beds as a result of the brisk movement of the particles. Packed beds serve as regenerators in heat transfer. As so-called packed columns they are frequently implemented as mass transfer apparatus. This normally involves the introduction of a liquid mixture at the top of a column with a gas of

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

381

diﬀerent composition ﬂowing in the opposite direction, as illustrated in Fig. 3.37. Through mass transfer one or more components of the gas are transferred into the liquid phase and the same occurs in reverse. In this way, toxic substances can be taken from the gas into a washing liquid falling down the column. The sizing of this type of apparatus is the object of thermal process engineering. This requires knowledge of the basics of heat and mass transfer which will be explained in the following.

Fig. 3.36: Packed bed of particles of diﬀerent sizes

Fig. 3.37: Packed column in countercurrent operation

In order to characterise the ﬂow space within ﬁlling we will consider packing of equally sized spheres of diameter dP . A suitable parameter for the description of packing is the void fraction ε := VG /V ,

(3.262)

formed with the void space space ﬁlled with gas VG and the total volume of the bed V = VG + VS . In this the volume VS of the solids is found from the volume VP of the individual particles and the number n of them, VS = nVP . Therefore VS nVP = =1−ε V V or for the number of particles per unit volume nV :=

n 1−ε . = V VP

(3.263)

This is ascertained when the void fraction and the volume of the particles are known. The two quantities, void fraction ε and particle diameter dP, are not suﬃcient to clearly describe the ﬂow and with that also the heat and mass transfer. Imagine a cubic packing of equally sized spheres placed one behind the other, as shown in Fig. 3.38a. This arrangement allows the ﬂuid to ﬂow along the gaps between the spheres. In an irregular packing, with the same void fraction, made up of spheres

382

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Fig. 3.38: Packing of spheres of the same size and void fraction a cubic packing b irregular packing

of the same diameter, the spaces between the spheres can become partially blocked and the throughﬂow will be more strongly hindered at some points than at others, as we can see in Fig. 3.38b. Despite having the same void fraction and particle diameter the ﬂow pattern can still be diﬀerent. Nevertheless the ﬂow, heat and mass transfer can still be described by the two parameters ε and dP , but only because in suﬃciently large packings these diﬀerences are balanced out in the statistical average. The speciﬁc surface area aP of particles of any shape is deﬁned by aP := nAP /V

(3.264)

(SI units m2 /m3 ), in which AP is the surface area of an individual particle. The speciﬁc surface area aP is a characteristic property of the packing. For packings of diﬀerent forms and shapes nAP is the sum of the individual particle surface areas put into the volume V . Further, with (3.263) aP =

nAP AP (1 − ε) , = V VP

(3.265)

where AP /VP is the speciﬁc surface area of an individual particle. For spherical particles it is equal to 6/d, so that for this aP =

6 (1 − ε) d

(3.266)

is valid. An example: A cubic packing of spheres, Fig. 3.38a, with z spheres per row and r rows behind and above each other has a volume V = (zd)(rd)(rd) = zr2 d3 . The volume of all the spheres is VS = nd3 π/6 = zr2 d3 π/6, and the void fraction is ε=1−

π VS = 1 − = 0.476 . V 6

An irregular packing of spheres has a void fraction of ε ≈ 0.4. Its speciﬁc surface area is, according to (3.266), aP ≈ 3.6/d. Spheres of 1 cm diameter in an irregular arrangement already have a speciﬁc surface area aP ≈ 360m2 /m3 . According to (3.263) the number of particles per unit volume is yielded to be nV ≈ 1.15 · 106 /m3 . A powder of spherical particles of 100 μm yields aP ≈ 3.6 · 104 m2 /m3 and nV ≈ 1.15 · 1012 /m3 . These numbers clearly show that the surface area available for heat and mass transfer in packings can be extraordinarily large.

When a ﬂuid ﬂows through a packing the heat transfer coeﬃcients increase rapidly in the ﬁrst few rows and then reach ﬁxed values, as Gillespie et al. [3.39]

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

383

indicated for the example of heat transfer in an irregular packing of spheres. The end values for the Nusselt number are signiﬁcantly larger in packings than for ﬂow around a single sphere. This is due to the frequent eddies and changes in direction of the ﬂuid. The corresponding ﬁndings would be expected for mass transfer. The end values of the mean Nusselt number N um in a packed bed of spherical particles and of the mean Nusselt number N umS in ﬂow around a single sphere have a certain relationship with each other that is only dependent on the void fraction. This has been shown by experimentation. This relationship is N um = fε N umS ,

(3.267)

where fε is an arrangement factor that is only dependent on the void fraction. The mean Nusselt number for ﬂow over a sphere is given in 3.7.4, No.5. The Reynolds number used there was formed with the mean eﬀective velocity weﬀ = wm /ε. This is found from the material balance wm A0 = weﬀ AG to be weﬀ = wm A0 /AG = wm /ε, where A0 is the cross sectional area of the empty column and AG is the void cross sectional area through which the gas ﬂows. The factor fε can be calculated with suﬃcient accuracy for the range 0.26 < ε < 1 according to Schl¨ under [3.40], from the simple formula fε = 1 + 1.5 (1 − ε) .

(3.268)

Eq. (3.267) also holds for packings with non-spherical particles. Values giving some idea of the arrangement factor fε are contained in Table 3.4. The values hold over the range 102 < Re < 104 , if the Reynolds number is formed with the eﬀective mean velocity weﬀ = wm/ε and an equivalent sphere diameter dP. This is calculated from the mean particle surface area AmP = aP/nV

(3.269)

with the speciﬁc surface area aP from (3.264) and the number nV of particles per unit volume according to (3.263), by comparison with a sphere of the same surface area, to be (3.270) dP = AmP /π . Table 3.4: Arrangement factor fε for packings of non-spherical particles Particle

fε

checked for

Cylinder, Length L, Diameter d

1.6

0.24 < L/d < 1.2

Cube

1.6

0.6 ≤ P r, Sc ≤ 1300

Raschig rings

2.1

P r = 0.7, Sc = 0.6

Berl saddle

2.3

Sc = 2.25

384

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

The heat ﬂow is calculated using the method already known with Q˙ = αm nAP Δϑlog and the logarithmic mean temperature diﬀerence (3.214) Δϑlog = (ϑe − ϑi )/ ln

ϑ0 − ϑi , ϑ0 − ϑ e

where ϑi is the inlet, ϑe the outlet (exit) temperature of the ﬂuid and ϑ0 is the surface temperature of the particle. The equations also hold in a corresponding manner for mass transfer. This merely requires the Nusselt number to be replaced by the Sherwood number and the Prandtl by the Schmidt number. Prerequisite for the validity of the equations > is however, a suﬃciently large value for the P´eclet number P e = ReP r ∼ 500 to 1000, because otherwise the ﬂow and therefore the heat and mass transfer are distributed unequally over the cross section. It may also be possible for ﬂow reversal to occur, such that the mean heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients could be smaller than those for ﬂow over a single body.

3.8.4

Porous bodies

Unlike packed beds, which by deﬁnition consist of an ordered or irregular arrangement of individual bodies, porous bodies consist of a solid porous material. In nature the pores are of diﬀerent size and form, and randomly distributed. Examples are the human lung, wood, lime rock and other porous rocks. As in packed beds the ﬂow through the pores is very irregular. Notwithstanding similar to packed beds the individual volume elements, though small in comparison to the total volume, but consisting of a great number of pores, can be considered as a continuum. Each volume element thus consists of a suﬃciently large number of pores embedded in a partial volume of solid material. To each of them uniform mean properties can be attributed. This permits us to describe ﬂuid ﬂow, heat and mass transfer with the well known balance equations of momentum, heat and mass transfer in a similar way as already done with packed beds. A more precise and detailed study of ﬂuid ﬂow, heat and mass transfer in the single pores would require elaborate statistical methods. This can be circumvented on the assumption that the porous body can be considered as a continuum. 3.8.4.1

Fluid ﬂow and momentum balance

The momentum or force balance of a porous body can be described by the experimentally well founded law of Darcy [3.41]. It was ﬁrst reported by Darcy in 1856 who made experiments on the water supply system of the city of Dijon in

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

385

France. According to his law the average ﬂow velocity through the cross section of a porous body is proportional to the overall pressure drop. As found out in subsequent experiments the average ﬂow velocity is also inversely proportional to the dynamic viscosity of the ﬂuid. Darcy’s law reads K ∂p , (3.271) wi = − η ∂xi wi is the average velocity in the direction of the axis i (x-, y- oder z-axis) through a cross section Ai of the porous body, deﬁned as 1 wi := wpi dApi , (3.272) Ai Api

Here, wpi is the local velocity through the porous medium, and Api the cross section, both in the direction i. In regions between the solid pores the local ﬂow is always three-dimensional. Thus, in a geometrical one-dimensional ﬂow in the direction of the x-axis we have K dp 1 wx = wpx dApx . (3.273) − = η dx Ax Apx

The quantity K in (3.271) and (3.273) is an empirical constant, named permeability. Its SI-unit is m2 . Some numerical values are listed in Table 3.5. The Table 3.5: Permeability, void fraction and grain size of porous material according to [3.42–3.45] Substance

Permeability m2

Limestone

2 · 10−15 − 4.5 · 10−14

Sand Sandstone (oilsand)

−11

2 · 10

−16

5 · 10

−18

− 1.8 · 10 − 3 · 10

−10

−12

− 10

Clay

10

10−16 − 10−12 −14

9.5 · 10

− 1.2 · 10

grain size mm

0.04 − 0.1 0.37 − 0.5

0.05 − 2

0.08 − 0.38

−15

Alluvial sand (silt) Leather

Void fraction ε

−13

0.4 − 0.7

< 0.002

0.35 − 0.5

0.002 − 0.05

0.56 − 0.59

permeability of columns packed with spheres of diameter d and void fraction ε according to Ergun [3.46] is K=

d2 ε3 . 150 (1 − ε)2

(3.274)

As found experimentally, Darcy’s law holds on the assumption that the ﬂow is slow enough as long as the Reynolds number deﬁned with K 1/2 as length scale ReK = wi K 1/2/ν

386

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

is smaller than one. An extension of Darcy’s law proved experimentally [3.47] over a wide range of Reynolds numbers 0.1 ≤ ReK ≤ 100 is the law of Forchheimer [3.48] dp η c∗F − = wi + 1/2 F wi |wi | (3.275) dxi K K with c∗F = 0.55. For packed beds this value depends also on the external size of the bed. According to Bevers et al.[3.48] this eﬀect is taken into account by c∗F = 0.55 (l − 5.5 d/deq ), Here, d is the diameter of the spheres and deq the equivalent diameter of the bed: deq =

2 dB H . dB + H

dB is the bed diameter and H its height. Forchheimer’s law applied to a ﬂow in x-direction may also be presented by means of the friction factor K 1/2 dp 1 ζK := − = + 0.55 (3.276) 2 F wx dx ReK with the Reynolds number ReK = wx K 1/2 /ν, whereas Darcy’s law (3.271) reads K 1/2 dp 1 ζK := − = . (3.277) F wx2 dx ReK . In Fig. 3.39 the friction factor ζK of a one-dimensional ﬂow through an isothermal saturated porous medium is plotted versus the Reynolds number ReK . The small circles represent experimental data of Ward [3.47]. It becomes evident that Darcy’s law is valid only for small Reynolds numbers. For large Reynolds numbers the quadratic term of Forchheimer’s law becomes predominant. Though the ﬂow even at larger Reynolds numbers is still laminar the form resistance prevails along the irregular ﬂow path through the pores. Example 3.12: Water of 10 ◦ C is permanently fed on top of a container of diameter d = 0.35 m. The container is ﬁlled with sand. How much water ﬂows out on the bottom of the container? The permeability of the sand layer is K = 10−10 m2 , the dynamic viscosity of water is η = 1.3 · 10−3 Pa · s, its density F = 103 kg/m3 . As the pressure drop is caused only by gravity forces, we have dp = −F g . dx With (3.271) we obtain K 10−10 0.352 π m3 dp K V˙ = wx A = − A= F g A = · 103 · 9.81 · , η dx η 1.3 · 10−3 4 s therefore

V˙ = 7.26 · 10−5 m3 /s = 4.36 dm3 /min .

From Forcheimer’s equation (3.275) results almost the same volumetric ﬂow, namely V˙ = 7.23 · 10−5 m3 /s = 4.34 dm3 /min.

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

387

Fig. 3.39: Friction factor of a one-dimensional ﬂow through an isothermal saturated porous medium according to Ward [3.47]

3.8.4.2

The energy balance

We consider a porous body with a ﬂuid ﬂowing in x-direction through the pores, exposed to heat conduction in y-direction. The ﬂuid shall be incompressible and of constant thermal conductivity λF . As follows from the energy balance (3.95) we have F cF

dϑF ∂ 2 ϑF = λF + φ with dt ∂y2

dϑF ∂ϑF ∂ϑF = + wpx . dt ∂t ∂x

Integrating over a cross section Apx of the porous medium, on the assumption that the temperature varies only little and can be considered as constant, leads to ∂ϑF ∂ϑF ∂ 2ϑF F c F Apx + F cF wpx dApx = λF A + φ dApx . (3.278) px ∂t ∂x ∂y 2 Apx

Apx

The volume element ΔV is exposed to a volume force fx , SI-unit N/m3 . In case that this force is a gravity force, we have fx = gx = 0 when the y-axis is perpendicularly upwards directed. Technical work is not performed so that 2 dwpx /2 dx ˙ t = 0 = ΔV dp + W ˙ diss + F ΔV W − F ΔV fx . dt dt dt

Between the narrow porous the ﬂow may be assumed as hydrodynam% 2 channels & ically fully developed, d wpx /2 /dt = 0. Thus the power dissipated per volume

388

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

element is

˙ diss dp W = − + F fx wx . ΔV dt Introducing this into (3.278) taking into account (3.272) and dp/dt = wx ∂p/∂x yields φ=

F cF

∂ϑF ∂ϑF ∂ 2 ϑF dp Apx − wx Ax + F fx wx Ax . Apx + F cF wx Ax = λF 2 ∂t ∂x ∂y dx

The void fraction of a porous medium is deﬁned as ε=

VP Apx Δx Apx , = = V Ax Δx Ax

where VP is the volume of the pores. With this the energy balance of the ﬂuid ﬂowing through the pores reads ε F cF

∂ϑF ∂ϑF ∂ 2 ϑF dp + F cF wx = ελF + F fx wx . − wx 2 ∂t ∂x ∂y dx

(3.279)

In a similar way we obtain for a geometrically three-dimensional ﬂow ε F cF

∂ϑF ∂ϑF ∂ 2 ϑF dp = ελF − wi + F fi wi . + F cF wi ∂t ∂xi ∂xi 2 dxi

(3.280)

If the only volume force is gravity, then we have fi = gi with the components (0, -g, 0) when the y-axis is perpendicularly upwards directed. The volume fraction of the porous medium is 1 − ε . The heat conduction of a geometrically one-dimensional ﬂow in y-direction then is (1 − ε) S cS

∂ϑS ∂ 2 ϑS = (1 − ε)λS 2 + (1 − ε)φS . ∂t ∂y

(3.281)

Here, φS is the power density of heat sources in the porous solid material. Adding (3.279) and (3.281) under the assumption that the temperatures of the solid and the ﬂuid within a volume element are the same, ϑS = ϑF = ϑ , we obtain ∂ϑ ∂ϑ + F cF wx = ∂t ∂x dp ∂ 2ϑ [ελF + (1 − ε)λS ] 2 + (1 − ε)φS + wx − + F fx . ∂y dx

[ε F cF + (1 − ε) ScS ]

With the abbreviations σ∗ :=

ε F cF + (1 − ε) S cS , ε F cF

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

389

λeﬀ := ελF + (1 − ε)λS and φ∗S := (1 − ε)φS , the energy balance becomes ∂ϑ ∂ 2ϑ dp ∗ ∂ϑ ∗ F c F σ + wx = λeﬀ 2 + φS + wx − + F f x . (3.282) ∂t ∂x ∂y dx The velocity of a ﬂuid, exposed to a volume force fx in addition to the external pressure drop, is K dp wx = − + F fx . (3.283) η dx Such a ﬂuid obeys instead of (3.282) the energy balance ∂ϑ ∂ϑ ∂ 2ϑ w2 η = λeﬀ 2 + φ∗S + x . F cF σ ∗ + wx ∂t ∂x ∂y K An equivalent derivation for a three-dimensional ﬂow leads to ∂ϑ ∂ 2ϑ wi2 η ∗ ∂ϑ ∗ F cF σ + wi = λeﬀ + φ + . S ∂t ∂xi ∂xi 2 K

(3.284)

(3.285)

In steady-state, ∂ϑ/∂t = 0, and geometrical one-dimensional ﬂow of constant velocity wx (3.284) simpliﬁes with τ := x/wx to F cF

∂ϑ ∂ 2ϑ w2 η = λeﬀ 2 + φ∗S + x . ∂τ ∂y K

(3.284a)

This is a parabolic diﬀerential equation of a geometrical one-dimensional ﬂow of the same form as the well-known heat conduction equation with heat sources , cf. (2.11). Here, the transformed coordinate τ := x/wx corresponds to the time t in (2.11). A great number of problems were solved with this equation by Nield and Bejan [3.49, 3.50] particularly setting φ∗S = 0 and wx2 η/K = 0. Example 3.13: Heat in steady state mode is transferred from a ﬂat plate to a porous medium, which extends from y=0 to y → ∞. A ﬂuid of constant velocity wx = w∞ permeates through the porous medium, Fig. 3.40. At the leading edge x = 0 the ﬂuid temperature is ϑ∞ < ϑ0 , where ϑ0 is the constant surface temperature of the ﬂat plate. As the problem is of steady-state nature and no heat sources are present, (3.284) simpliﬁes to ∂ϑ ∂ 2 ϑ w2 η F cF w∞ = λeﬀ 2 + ∞ ∂x ∂y K subject to the boundary conditions ϑ(x = 0, y) = ϑ∞ ,

ϑ(x, y = 0) = ϑ0

and

∂ϑ(x, y → ∞) =0 ∂y

The boundary condition ∂ϑ(x, y → ∞)/∂y = 0 implies that the heat ﬂow becomes negligible in a suﬃciently large distance from the wall. Nevertheless, due to friction the temperature increases along the ﬂow path. We introduce dimensionless quantities: ϑ+ :=

ϑ − ϑ∞ , ϑ0 − ϑ∞

y + :=

y , L

x+ :=

aF x L2 w∞

390

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Here, aF = λeﬀ /F cF is the thermal diﬀusivity and L a characteristic length. We choose L :=

λeﬀ (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) K 2 η w∞

1/2 .

With this we obtain the simple partial diﬀerential equation ∂ϑ+ ∂ 2 ϑ+ = +1 . ∂x+ ∂y + 2

(3.286)

Fig. 3.40: Heat transfer in a porous medium near a heated wall The boundary conditions are % & ϑ+ x+ = 0, y + = 0,

% & ϑ+ x+ , y + = 0 = 1 and

∂ϑ+ (x+ , y + → ∞) =0 . ∂y +

The solution of (3.286), subject to the boundary conditions is 2 y+ x+ y+ −y + + + + + ϑ =x + 1−x − erfc √ +y exp . 2 π 4x+ 2 x+

(3.287)

The local Nusselt number is deﬁned as N ux =

αx x =− λeﬀ L

∂ϑ+ ∂y +

. y + =0

The temperature slope (∂ϑ+ /∂y + )y + =0 at the wall follows from (3.287) and with this we obtain the local Nusselt number √ αx 1 x 1 √ N ux = = √ − 2 x+ . λeﬀ πL x+ Herein is x x √ = L L x+ and

x√ + x x = L L

w∞ L2 aF x

aF x w∞ L2

1/2 =

1/2 =

x2 L2

w∞ x aF

aF w∞ x

1/2 = P e1/2 x

1/2 =

x2 −1/2 Pe . L2 x

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

391

Introducing the characteristic length L we obtain from this, setting νF = η/F : x√ + νF aF x = P e3/2 . L cF (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) K x With this the local Nusselt number reads αx 1 νaF 3/2 N ux = =√ P e1/2 − 2 P e . x λeﬀ π cF (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) K x

(3.288)

√ 1/2 The ﬁrst term (1/ π) P ex = (N ux )conv is equal to the local Nusselt number of a ﬂat plate with frictionless parallel ﬂow, cf. also (3.196a) for P r → 0. The second term stands for the inﬂuence of friction. It disappears in a frictionless ﬂow, because then we have K → ∞, cf. also (3.284). As can be deduced from (3.288) the friction term becomes negligible compared to the convection term, if P ex

1 cF |ϑ0 − ϑ∞ | K . 2 νaF

This occurs however only when velocities are very small as the following example demonstrates. Water of 20 ◦ C permeates through a layer of clay. The void fraction of the clay is ε = 0.3, its permeability K = 6.6 · 10−12 m2 . The thermophysical properties of water are F = 998 kg/m3 , cF = 4.181 · 103 J/kg K, λF = 0.598 W/K m and ν = 1.004 · 10−6 m2 /s. With λS = 1.3 W/K m we obtain λeﬀ = 1.089 W/K m and aF = λeﬀ /F cF = 2.61 · 10−7 m2 /s. Thus, the friction term may be neglected compared to the convection term when P ex 5.265 · 104 |ϑ0 − ϑ∞ | As this example shows, friction becomes only important when temperature diﬀerences ϑ0 − ϑ∞ are suﬃciently small. The heat ﬂux is obtained from (3.288). It is λeﬀ νaF 3/2 P e q˙ = α (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) = √ P e1/2 (ϑ − ϑ ) − 2 . (3.289) 0 ∞ x x π cF K x Three diﬀerent cases are noteworthy: a) For ϑ0 = ϑ∞ , the heat ﬂux is λeﬀ 2 νaF q˙ = − √ P e3/2 . x π cF K x It is directed towards the wall. Hence the negative sign. b) For ϑ0 > ϑ∞ , heat is removed from the wall by convection and conduction. Simultaneously the porous medium is heated by dissipation of the ﬂuid. This provokes a heat ﬂux from the porous body towards the wall. As long as P´eclet numbers are small, heat ﬂows from the wall into the porous medium. In the opposite case of large P´eclet numbers heat ﬂows from the porous medium towards the wall. For a P´eclet number of P ex =

cF (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) K 2 ν aF

both heat ﬂuxes cancel out. c) For ϑ0 < ϑ∞ , heat is transferred by convection and conduction to the wall. The dissipated heat ﬂux is transferred to the wall.

392

3.8.4.3

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Heat transfer inside channels

We discuss here the convective heat transfer inside channels which are ﬁlled with a porous medium. As a simple case we ﬁrst study the heat transfer inside a channel bounded by coplanar plates. Then we treat the heat transfer in cylindrical channels. In both cases Darcy’s law is supposed to be applicable, according to which the velocity wx over a cross section is assumed constant. As depicted in Fig. 3.41 a ﬂuid of temperature ϑα enters the channel. Heat is transferred with heat transfer coeﬃcient α into the environment (index e) by convection. Steady-

Fig. 3.41: Heat transfer to a porous body inside a tube

state heat transfer is assumed, ∂ϑ/∂t = 0. The dissipated heat due to friction in the small pores is taken into account by a source term in the energy balance. Then (3.285) reads 2 ∂ϑ wx2 η ∂ ϑ n ∂ϑ + F cF wx + = λeﬀ (3.290) ∂x ∂r2 r ∂r K Here we have n = 0 for a ﬂow inside a ﬂat channel and n = 1 for a ﬂow inside a tube. The boundary conditions are: x=0

:

ϑ (r) = ϑα

r=0

:

∂ϑ/∂r = 0

r=R

:

−λ

∂ϑ = α (ϑ − ϑe ) . ∂r

(3.291)

Here we may ask ourselves if the dissipated energy should be considered in view of the small velocities through the narrow pores. It is however noteworthy that the dissipated energy may not be neglected, particularly when gases ﬂow through. This becomes evident when we assess the temperature rise ∂ϑD /∂x along the channel due to dissipation. According to (3.290) we have F cF wx

∂ϑD w2 η ≈ x ∂x K

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

393

and from that with (3.273) ∂ϑD ∂p 1 . ≈− ∂x ∂x F cF If, for example atmospheric air of 20 ◦C with an excess pressure of 0.02 bar is pressed through a porous layer of thickness 1 m, we obtain N 1 ∂ϑD ≈ 0.02 · 106 2 = 15.7 K/m . ∂x m 1 m · 1.27 kg/m3 · 103 J/kg K Such a temperature rise may not be neglected. If on the other hand, water under the same conditions is pressed through the porous layer, because of the higher density of water and its high heat capacity the temperature rise due to dissipation becomes very small ∂ϑD N 1 ≈ 0.02 · 106 2 = 5 · 10−3 K/m . 3 3 ∂x m 1 m · 10 kg/m · 4 · 103 J/kg K As these estimates illustrate, dissipation, particularly in gas ﬂow, can be important. We therefore do not neglect it in the following. We introduce dimensionless quantities in the heat conduction equation (3.290): ϑ+ :=

ϑ − ϑe ; ϑα − ϑe

P reﬀ :=

x+ :=

ν ; aeﬀ

x aeﬀ λeﬀ mit aeﬀ = ; 2 wx R F cF

Φ+ =

wx2 R2 P reﬀ ; cF K (ϑα − ϑe )

Bi =

r+ :=

r ; R

αR . λeﬀ

With these (3.290) transfers into ∂ϑ+ ∂ 2 ϑ+ n ∂ϑ+ = + + Φ+ . ∂x+ ∂r+2 r+ ∂r+

(3.292)

The boundary conditions are: x+ = 0

:

% & ϑ+ r + = 1

r+ = 0

:

∂ϑ+/∂r+ = 0

r+ = 1

:

−

∂ϑ+ = Bi ϑ+ . ∂r+

(3.293)

We ﬁrst deal with the results for a ﬂat channel, n = 0. To allow for solution of (3.292), the temperature proﬁle, similar to chapter 3.2.4.2 is written as product in the form % & % +& % +& 1−r+2 + + + + ϑ r ,x = F r G x + Φ + const . (3.294) 2

394

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Here, const is still undeﬁned. With this product formulation (3.292) is converted into % & dG d2 F % + & = G x F r+ dx+ dr+2 or 1 1 dG d2 F = . G (x+ ) dx+ F (r+ ) dr+2 Equality of both sides requires each of them to be equal to a constant μ2 . With this we obtain as well known, cf. chapter 3.2.4.2, two ordinary diﬀerential equations 1 1 dG d2 F 2 = −μ and = −μ2 . G (x+ ) dx+ F (r+ ) dr+2 The solution of the ﬁrst equation is % & & % G x+ = C0 exp −μ2 x+ , and that of the second equation & % & % F r+ = C1 cos μ r+ . From this follows the temperature proﬁle % & % & % & ϑ+ r+, x+ = C cos μ r+ exp −μ2 x+ + Φ+

1−r+2 + const . 2

(3.295)

It satisﬁes already the boundary condition at r+ = 0: ∂ϑ+/∂r+ = 0. Satisfying the boundary condition −∂ϑ+/∂r+ = Bi ϑ+ at r+ = 1 yields % & & % C μ sin (μ) exp −μ2 x+ + Φ+ = Bi C cos (μ) exp −μ2 x+ + Φ const . We dispose now of the unknown constant const, introducing const = 1/Bi. Then the eigenvalues μ obey the equation tan μ = Bi/μ,

(3.296)

which is identical with (2.170), as already found in chapter 2.3.4.3. The solution of (3.292) comprises an inﬁnite number of eigenvalues. The sum ∞ % & & % 2 +& % 1−r+2 1 + + + + + Ci cos μi r exp −μi x + Φ ϑ r ,x = (3.297) + 2 Bi i=1 is therefore a general solution of the heat conduction equation (3.292). It satisﬁes all boundary conditions, except the initial condition ϑ+ (r+, x+ = 0) = 1. In order to fulﬁll this condition there must be ∞ & % 1−r+2 1 + + 1= Ci cos μi r + Φ . + 2 Bi i=1

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

395

Multiplication of both sides with cos (μj r+ ) and integration over the boundaries r+ = 0 and r+ = 1 yields under consideration of the orthogonality condition, explained already in chapter (3.296): 1

& % & % cos μi r+ cos μj r+ dr+ = 0 for all i = j ,

0

the unknown constants Ci 2 sin μi 2 sin μi Ci = − Φ+ 2 . μi + sin μi cos μi μi (μi + sin μi cos μi ) With (3.296) this result can be simpliﬁed to Ci = ci + Φ+ di .

(3.298)

Here, ci and di stand for ci =

2 sin μi 2 Bi 1 = 2 ; μi + sin μi cos μi Bi + Bi + μ2i cos μi

di = −

ci . μ2i

(3.299)

With this the temperature proﬁle ϑ+ (r+, x+ ) can be split into two terms +

ϑ

%

+

+

r ,x

&

=

∞

& % & % ci cos μi r+ exp −μ2i x+ + () + + ϑ+ (r ,x ) I

'i=1 +Φ '

+

*

∞ % & % 2 +& 1−r+2 1 + di cos μi r exp −μi x + + . 2 Bi i=1 () * + + ϑ+ II (r , x )

(3.300)

+ + The ﬁrst term ϑ+ I (r , x ) describes the proﬁle of vanishing dissipation, and is identical with (2.171), if we replace there the dimensionless time t+ = a t/R2 by the + + dimensionless local coordinate x+ = x aeﬀ / (wx R2 ). The second term ϑ+ II (r , x ) represents the inﬂuence of dissipation on the temperature proﬁle. The dimensionless average temperature

1 ϑ+ m

ϑ+ dr+

= 0

is obtained after integration of (3.300). It is ϑ+ m =

∞

ci

i=1

+Φ

& % sin μi exp −μ2i x+ + μi

+

sin μi & % 1 1 di exp −μ2 x+ + + 4 Bi i=1 μi ∞

.

(3.301)

396

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

For suﬃciently large values of x+ only the ﬁrst term of (3.300) is required. It is % + +& % & % & = c cos μ r+ exp −μ2 x+ + ϑ+ 1 r ,x

% & % & 1 1−r+2 + + d cos μ r+ exp −μ2 x+ + Φ+ . (3.302) 2 Bi The ﬁrst eigenvalue μ = μ1 , as well as the quantities c = c1 and d = d1 , depends on the Biot number Bi = α R/λ. The former Table 2.6 contains μ1 and c1. They were already determined as a solution of (3.296) and (3.299). Values d1 = d are obtained after multiplication of c1 with −1/μ2 according to (3.299). The heat transfer in tubes is described by (3.292), setting there n = 1. The product ansatz now yields a temperature proﬁle % & % & % & 1−r+2 ϑ+ r+, x+ = C J0 μi r+ exp −μ2i x+ + Φ+ (3.303) + const . 2 Here, J0 is the Bessel function of the ﬁrst kind and zeroth order. This proﬁle satisﬁes already the boundary condition (∂ϑ+/∂r+ ) = 0 at r+ = 0. The boundary condition − (∂ϑ+ /∂r+ ) = Bi ϑ+ at r+ = 1 is satisﬁed with & & % % C μ J1 (μ) exp −μ2 x+ + Φ+ = Bi C J0 (μ) exp −μ2 x+ + Φ+ const . Setting const = 1/Bi, we obtain the conditional equation for the eigenvalues μ J1 (μ) = Bi J0 (μ) .

(3.304)

It coincides with (2.177). As solution of (3.304) we obtain an inﬁnite number of eigenvalues. Therefore, the sum ∞ % & % & % 2 +& 1 1−r+2 + + + + + ϑ r ,x = (3.305) + Ci J0 μi r exp −μi x + Φ 2 Bi i=1 represents the general solution of the heat conduction equation (3.292) for n = 1. The constants Ci are found from the initial condition ϑ+ (r+, x+ = 0) = 1 to Ci = ci + Φ+ di .

(3.306)

It is ci =

2 J1 (μi ) 2 Bi 2 % & and di = −ci 2 . 2 2 = 2 2 μi Bi + μi J0 (μi ) μi J0 (μi ) + J1 (μi )

(3.307)

With this the temperature proﬁle according to (3.305) is split into two terms ∞ % & % & % & ϑ+ r+, x+ = ci J0 μi r+ exp −μ2i x+ + 'i=1 +Φ '

+

() + + ϑ+ (r ,x ) I

*

∞ % +& % 2 +& 1−r+2 1 di J0 μi r exp −μi x + + . 2 Bi i=1 () * + + ϑ+ (r , x ) II

(3.308)

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

397

+ + As in (3.300) the ﬁrst term ϑ+ I (r , x ) describes the temperature proﬁle without dissipation, and is identical with (2.178), if there the dimensionless time t+ = a t/R2 is replaced by the dimensionless local coordinate x+ = x aeﬀ / (wx R2 ), cf. + + Fig. 2.30. The second term ϑ+ II (r , x ) stands for the inﬂuence of dissipation. The dimensionless average temperature follows from

1 ϑ+ m

=2

% & ϑ+ r+, x+ r+ dr+

0

and is ϑ+ m

∞ exp (−μ2i x+ ) = 4 Bi + μ2i (Bi2 + μ2i ) i=1 2

+Φ

+

exp (−μ2 x+ ) 1 1 i + − 8 Bi2 4 2 + μ2 ) 4 Bi μ (Bi i i i=1 ∞

.

(3.309)

For large values x+ the ﬁrst term of the series (3.308) is suﬃcient % + +& % & % & ϑ+ = c exp −μ2 x+ J0 μ r+ 1 r ,x

+2 % 2 +& % +& 1 + 1−r + + d exp −μ x J0 μ r +Φ .(3.310) 2 Bi The ﬁrst eigenvalue μ1 = μ and the constant c1 = c as function of the Biot number Bi = α R/λ are listed in Table 2.6; the quantity d1 = d follows from (3.307).

II

Φ

1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

x + + + Fig. 3.42: Local temperature rise ϑ+ II (x )/Φ due to friction along the axis r = 0 of a porous tube, Bi = αR/λ = 1.0

398

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

+ + + + Fig. 3.42 presents ϑ+ II (r = 0, x ) /Φ as function of x . As the Figure shows the friction is small near the entrance section of the tube and approaches asymptotically an end value, which also holds for a ﬂat channel + + 1 ϑ+ 1 II (r = 0, x → ∞) = + + Φ 2 Bi

The end value is 1.5 for Bi = 1 as shown in Fig. 3.42 .

3.8.5

Fluidised beds

Fluidised beds consist of solid particles which are maintained in a suspension by a ﬂuid ﬂowing upwards through them. They were ﬁrst used in the Winkler process (German patent DRP 437 970 from 28th Sept. 1922) for carbon gasiﬁcation. Nowadays ﬂuidised beds are used in a variety of ways; for chemical reactions and among others for the mixing, agglomeration or drying of solids. Fig. 3.43 shows schematically a gas-solid ﬂuidised bed. In order to generate a ﬂuidised bed, the velocity of the ﬂuid ﬂowing upwards must be just great enough, so that a balance between the forces exerted by the ﬂuid and the weight of the particles exists. Then $ # (3.311) Δp = gH = S (1 − ε) + F ε gH , where H is the height of the solid particles in the column, S the density of the solid material and F that of the ﬂuid and = (V − VS /V = VF /V the void fraction. As the mass of the solid remains constant, independent of how high the solid particles are forced upwards by the ﬂuid, it holds that MS = S (1 − ε) A0 H = const

Fig. 3.43: Fluidised bed

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

399

and in a column with a constant cross section S (1 − ε) H = const . As we can see, the void fraction increases with the height of the ﬂuidised bed. On the other hand in gas-solid ﬂuidised beds it is almost always the case that F S , and therefore also Δp ∼ = S (1 − ε) gH = const . The pressure drop in a ﬂuidised bed is independent of its height in good approximation constant. In order to bring the solid particles into suspension, the ﬂuid has to exceed a certain minimum velocity, the so-called minimum ﬂuidisation velocity wmf , so wG ≥ wmf . This is yielded, with the help of the approximation equation from the VDI-HeatAtlas [3.51]:

1/2 3 3 wmf dP ∼ (1 − εmf ) −4 ϕS εmf Ar − 1 Remf = 42.9 1 + 3.11 · 10 = ν ϕS (1 − εmf )2 (3.312) with the Archimedes number Ar as the ratio of the lift to the frictional forces Ar :=

S − F d3P g F ν2

and the sphericity deﬁned as ϕS :=

Surface area of a sphere of the same volume as a particle . Particle surface area

Numerical values for the sphericity are contained in the VDI-HeatAtlas [3.51]; for example, ﬁre-blasted sand has ϕS = 0.86. εmf is the void fraction at the ﬂuidisation point. At velocities above the minimum ﬂuidisation velocity the ﬂuidised bed expands. Its height and void fraction increase. Solid-liquid systems expand continuously with increasing liquid velocity, and the solid particles are homogeneously distributed. In solid-gas systems gas bubbles form inside the ﬂuidised bed, so that a heterogeneous system exists. The ﬂuid velocity or the Reynolds number of the ﬂuid and the void fraction are not independent of each other in ﬂuidised beds as they are in packed beds. Rather the void fraction increases with the Reynolds number, from the value of ε∼ = 0.4 for a packed bed to a value of ε → 1, which will then be approximately reached, if only one particle is located in a large volume. Heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients in a ﬂuidised bed lie between the values for a packed bed and those for a single particle. The fundamental pattern of the Nusselt or Sherwood number as functions of the Reynolds number is illustrated in Fig. 3.44. In this the Nusselt number N u = α dP /λ or the Sherwood number

400

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Fig. 3.44: Heat and mass transfer at the transition from packed to ﬂuidised bed

Sh = βdP / d and the Reynolds number Re = wmdP /ν are all formed with the particle diameter, which for non-spherical particles is the same as the equivalent sphere diameter according to (3.270). In the Reynolds number wm is the mean velocity in the imaginary empty packing. If the Reynolds number is increased in a packed bed, the Nusselt and Sherwood numbers increase corresponding to the left branch of the curve in Fig. 3.44. Once the upward ﬂowing ﬂuid has reached the minimum ﬂuidisation velocity wmf and with that the Reynolds number the value Remf = wmf dP /ν, point a in Fig. 3.44, a ﬂuidised bed is formed. The heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients hardly change with increasing ﬂuid velocity: The Nusselt and Sherwood numbers are only weakly dependent on the Reynolds number, corresponding to the slightly upwardly arched line a b in Fig. 3.44. After a certain ﬂuid velocity has been reached, indicated here by point b in Fig. 3.44, the particles are carried upwards. At point b the heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients are about the same as those for ﬂow around a single sphere of diameter dP . In an homogeneous (bubble free) ﬂuidised bed the velocity with which the particles are just carried out at point b is equal to the ﬂuid velocity wS . Points on the rising branch of the line for ﬂow around a single sphere to the right of point b are attributed to a ﬂuid velocity greater than the particle velocity. They lie in the region of pneumatic transport. An observer moving with the ﬂuid would, upon reaching point b, have the impression that the particle was about to start falling. The particle velocity in a homogeneous ﬂuidised bed at point b is the same as the falling velocity wS of a particle in a quiescent ﬂuid. This can be calculated from the balance of the buoyancy FB and resistances forces FR . This is FB = ( S − F )

d2 π w2 d3P π g = F R = c R P F S . 6 4 2

(3.313)

The resistance factor follows as cR =

4 ( S − F ) dP g . 3 F wS2

(3.314)

With the Reynolds number ReS = wS dP /ν and the previously deﬁned Archimedes

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

401

number, the resistance factor can also be written as cR =

4 Ar . 3 Re2S

(3.315)

As the resistance factor cR in ﬂow around a sphere is dependent on the Reynolds number, according to (3.315), a relationship between the Reynolds number formed with the falling velocity wS and the Archimedes number can be derived, ReS = f (Ar). In process engineering the main interest lies in the region ReS ≤ 104 . The area above ReS = 105 , in which the transition from laminar to turbulent boundary layer occurs, can generally be disregarded for chemical engineering tasks. By solving the Navier-Stokes equation up to Re = 80 and comparing this with experiments enabled Brauer and co-workers [3.52] to ﬁnd a very accurate empirical law, for values up to Re = 104 , for the resistance factor cR =

24 5.48 + 0.36 . + Re Re0.573

(3.316)

Our case with Re = wS dP /ν = ReS has to be put into this. It includes Stokes’ law cR = 24/Re which is valid for low Reynolds numbers 0 ≤ Re ≤ 0.1, and reaches, at the limit of validity Re = 104 , the value cR = 0.39. Now, putting (3.316) into (3.315), gives a transcendental equation of the form Ar(ReS ), from which, at a given Archimedes number Ar, the Reynolds number ReS can be developed by iteration. In order to reduce the computation time, without a signiﬁcant loss in accuracy, (3.316) is replaced by the following approximation, which is valid for the range 0 ≤ Re ≤ 104 , 1/1.8 1.8 24 cR ∼ . (3.317) = 0.36 1 + 0.36 Re Then, inserting this into (3.315), taking into account Re = ReS , we obtain an explicit expression for the Reynolds number ⎡ ⎤1.8 1/2 1/1.8 Ar ReS ∼ − 1⎦ , (3.318) = 19.14 ⎣ 1 + 12.84 valid for homogeneous ﬂuidised beds over the range 0 ≤ ReS ≤ 104 or 0 ≤ Ar ≤ 2.9 · 107 . In heterogeneous ﬂuidised beds, like those where gas ﬂows through the bed, (3.318) is likewise valid for 0 ≤ ReS ≤ 1.2·102 or 0 ≤ Ar ≤ 104 . In regions beyond this, i.e. ReS ≥ 1.2 · 102 or Ar ≥ 104 , according to Reh [3.54], the following holds for heterogeneous ﬂuidised beds 1/2 4 ∼ ReS = . (3.319) Ar 3

402

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

The Reynolds numbers calculated according to (3.318) barely deviate from those calculated using a diﬀerent equation communicated by Martin [3.53], but reproduce the relationship ReS (Ar), which is gained by inserting the accurate resistance law (3.316) from Brauer into (3.315), somewhat better. The maximum error in the Reynolds number from the approximation equation (3.318) is around 3.5 %. With assistance from (3.318) or (3.319), the Reynolds number ReS at the point b, for stipulated Archimedes numbers, can be calculated. Fig. 3.45 shows the plot of the heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients in ﬂuidised beds for diﬀerent Archimedes numbers. After a suggestion by Martin [3.53] the slightly curved lines for the heat and mass transfer in a ﬂuidised bed are replaced by the dotted horizontal lines, Fig. 3.44 and 3.45. The heat and mass transfer coeﬃcients are the same there as those for ﬂow around a single sphere, point b in Fig. 3.44. The equation valid for this is taken from section 3.7.4, No.5, in which ReS = ws dp /ν is used for the Reynolds number.

Fig. 3.45: Heat and mass transfer ﬂuid/particle in the ﬂuidised bed, according to Martin [3.53]

Finally, some observations on the energy balance for a ﬂuidised bed reactor. The temperature pattern in solid particles is, as explained for transient heat conduction in solids, determined decisively by the Biot number Bi = α dP /λs . It is the ratio of the thermal resistance in the solid to that in the gas. Due to the small dimensions of the particle and the good thermal conductivity of the solid in comparison to that of the gas, the thermal resistance of the particle can usually be neglected compared to that of the gas. This means that the Biot numbers in ﬂuidised beds are very small. Local temperature variations in the particle can therefore be neglected. On the other hand, if the particles are well mixed in the ﬂuidised bed, the initial temperature changes will rapidly disappear. This allows us to assign a

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

403

uniﬁed temperature to the particles in a ﬂuidised bed, through which the energy balance is signiﬁcantly simpliﬁed. If we consider a volume element dV = A0 dx, of height dx, where A0 is the free cross section of a ﬂuidised bed, see Fig. 3.43, the ﬂuid temperature changes as follows, due to the heat transfer from ﬂuid to the solid particles − M˙ F cpF dϑF = α n dAp (ϑF − ϑS )

(3.320)

with n dAP = aPA0 dx. Then, because of M˙ F = wm A0 F , − dϑF α ap = dx . ϑF − ϑS F wm cpF Integration between the inlet cross section i and the exit cross section e of a ﬂuidised bed of height H yields ln

αm a p ϑFi − ϑS = H ϑFe − ϑS F wm cpF

or with (3.266), when the equivalent sphere diameter dP according to (3.270), and the mean Nusselt number N um = αm dP /λ, the Reynolds number Re = wm dP /λ and the Prandtl number P r = ν/a of the ﬂuid are used, ln

N um 6 (1 − ε)H ϑFi − ϑS = . ϑFe − ϑS ReP r dP

(3.321)

Corresponding considerations also hold for mass transfer. The diﬀusion resistance of the particle can be neglected when compared to that of the gas, and so a uniﬁed composition can be assigned to the particle. When only one component A is transferred between a ﬂuid, consisting of components A , B, and the solid S, the calculation can be usefully made using the mass content of the ﬂuid XF = (M˙ A /M˙ B )F . Then, under the assumption of a not too large mass content of component A in the solid, see equation (1.195a) −M˙ B dXF = β

p RB T

dAp (XF − XS ) = β B aP A0 dx (XF − XS ) .

Here XS = (M˙ A /M˙ B )S is the mass content of the ﬂuid on the solid surface. After integration between the inlet cross section i and the outlet cross section e of a ﬂuidised bed of height H we obtain, with M˙ B = wm A0 B , under consideration of (3.266) and the deﬁnitions Shm = βm dP /D, Re = wm dP /ν, Sc = ν/D: ln

Shm 6 (1 − ε)H XFi − XS = . XFe − XS ReSc dP

(3.322)

404

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Example 3.14: In a ﬂuidised bed, wet sand is to be dried by air which has a lower moisture content but is at the same temperature as the sand. During this the water vapour content of the air increases from the initial value XFi to the value XFe . At the surface of the sand the air is saturated with water. Its water content there is XS , so that the driving content diﬀerence XS − XFi falls to the end value XS − XFe . How high must the ﬂuidised bed be, such that the driving diﬀerence XS − XFe at the outlet cross section is only 5 % of the driving diﬀerence XS − XFi at the inlet cross section? The velocity wm at the free cross section is 10 times the ﬂuidisation velocity wL . Given are: particle diameter dP = 0.5 mm, density of the sand S = 1500 kg/m3 , density of the air F = 0.8 kg/m3 , kinematic viscosity of the air ν = 3 · 10−5 m2 /s, Schmidt number Sc = 0.7, sphericity of sand ϕS = 0.86, void fraction εS = 0.73, void fraction at minimum ﬂuidisation point εmf = 0.4. We have XS − XFe = 0.05 (XS − XFi ) and therefore in (3.282) ln

XFi − XS Shm 6 (1 − ε) H = ln 20 = 2.996 = . XFe − XS Re Sc dP

For all values

H Re Sc ≈ 0.5 dP Shm (1 − ε)

the driving diﬀerence at the outlet cross section is reduced to less than 5 % of the value at the inlet cross section. The calculation of the Sherwood number necessitates investigation of the Archimedes number Ar =

(S − F ) d3P g (1500 − 0.8) kg/m3 · (0.5 · 10−3 )3 m · 9.81 m/s2 = = 2 553 . F ν 2 0.8 kg/m3 (3 · 10−5 )2 m4 /s2

According to (3.318) ⎡ ⎤1.8 1/2 1.8 1/1.8 1/1.8 1/2 1 + Ar 1 + 2553 ReS ≈ 19.14 ⎣ − 1⎦ = 19.14 −1 = 47.75 . 12.84 12.84 According to section 3.7.4, No. 5, Shm, lam

=

Shm, turb

=

Shm

=

1/2

0.664 ReS Sc1/3 = 0.664 · 47.751/2 · 0.71/3 = 4.07 0.037 Re0.8 0.037 · 47.750.8 · 0.7 S Sc = = 0.88 −0.1 1 + 2.443 ReS (Sc2/3 − 1) 1 + 2.443 · 47.75−0.1 · (0.72/3 − 1) 1/2 2 + Sh2m, lam + Sh2m, turb = 2 + (4.072 + 0.882 )1/2 = 6.16 .

According to (3.312) the minimum ﬂuidisation velocity follows from 1/2 wmf dP 1 − εmf ϕ3s ε3mf −4 Remf = = 42.9 1 + 3.11 · 10 Ar −1 ν ϕS (1 − εmf )2 1/2 1 − 0.4 0.863 · 0.43 Remf = 42.9 1 + 3.11 · 10−4 2553 − 1 = 1.31 . 0.86 (1 − 0.4)2 Due to Re = 10 Remf = 13.1 we have wm = Re

ν 3 · 10−5 m2 /s = 13.1 = 0.786 m/s . dP 0.5 · 10−3 m

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

405

With that we get H 13.1 · 0.7 ≈ 0.5 = 2.73 dP 6.16 (1 − 0.73)

and

H ≈ 1.38 · 10−3 m .

It can be seen from this that the driving water vapour content rapidly drops down. The minimum required height of the ﬂuidised bed is accordingly very small. Example 3.15: Calculate the actual height of the ﬂuidised bed from example 3.14, when the ﬁll height is 1 m, and show how far the driving content diﬀerence between inlet and exit cross sections is really reduced. The mass of the solid is the same at the ﬂuidisation point as the operating point. It follows from this that A0 Hmf S (1 − εmf ) = A0 H S (1 − εS ) or

H 1 − εmf 1 − 0.4 = = = 2.22 . Hmf 1 − εS 1 − 0.73 The ﬁll height is the same as the height at the minimum ﬂuidisation point Hmf = 1 m, from which H = 2.22 m. With (3.322) we then have ln

XFi − XS XFe − XS

=

6.16 6 (1 − 0.73) · 2.22 m = 4 831 13.1 · 0.7 0.5 · 10−3 m

XFe − XS

≈ 0

or XFe ≈ XS .

By the exit cross section the driving mass content diﬀerence has completely vanished. Example 3.16: Coﬀee beans that have been heated to 300 ◦ C by roasting are to be cooled, in a ﬂuidised bed with ambient air at a temperature of 20 ◦ C, to a temperature of 30 ◦ C. Calculate the time required for this to happen. The following values are given: For the coﬀee beans: density S = 630 kg/m3 , speciﬁc heat capacity cS = 1.70 kJ/kgK, equivalent particle diameter dP = 6 mm, thermal conductivity λS = 0.6 W/Km, mass of beans MS = 100 kg, void fraction of the ﬂuidised bed ε = 0.7. For the air the following values are given: mass ﬂow rate M˙ G = 5 kg/s, density G = 1.188 kg/m3 , speciﬁc heat capacity cpG = 1.006 kJ/kgK, thermal conductivity λG = 0.0257 W/Km, kinematic viscosity νG = 15.3 · 10−6 m2 /s, Prandtl number P r = 0.708, cross section of the column 1.4 m2 . Hints for the solution: The temperatures ϑFe = ϑGe of the gas and ϑS of the surface of the particle in (3.321) are functions of time and the energy balance MS cS

dϑmS = M˙ G cpG (ϑGi − ϑG ) dt

is available as a further equation for these two temperatures. The violent motion of the solid means that its mean temperature ϑmS is only a function of time and not position, so that both the left and right hand sides are independent of position. This means that the gas temperature ϑG on the right hand side can be replaced by the value ϑGe at the exit cross section. MS is the total amount of solid. The Archimedes number has to be found before we can calculate the Nusselt number N um according to (3.321): S − F d3P g Ar = . F ν2 Here, F = G and ν = νG . Which gives Ar =

(630 − 1.188) kg/m3 (6 · 10−3 )3 m3 · 9.81 m/s2 = 4.79 · 106 . 1.188 kg/m3 (15.3 · 10−6 )2 m4 /s2

406

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

It then follows from (3.319) that 4 4 ReS = ( Ar )1/2 = ( · 4.79 · 106 )1/2 = 2.527 · 103 . 3 3 According to section 3.7.4, No. 5, 1/2

N um, lam

= 0.664 ReS P r1/3 = 0.664 (2.527 · 103 )1/2 (0, 708)1/3 = 29.74

N um, turb

=

0.037 Re0.8 S Pr 1 + 2.443 Re−0.1 (P r 2/3 − 1) S

=

0.037 · (2.527 · 103 )0.8 · 0.708 = 17.93 1 + 2.443 · (2.527 · 103 )−0.1 · (0.7082/3 − 1)

N um

1/2 = 2 + N u2m, lam + N u2m, turb = 2 + (29.742 + 17.932 )1/2 = 36.73 .

The velocity in the empty column is wm =

M˙ G 5 kg/s = = 3 m/s . G A0 1.188 kg/m3 · 1.4 m2

With that we have Re =

wm dP 3 m/s · 6 · 10−3 m = = 1.176 · 103 . νG 15.3 · 10−6 m2 /s

In (3.321), with ϑF = ϑG ln

ϑGi − ϑS 36.84 6(1 − 0.7)H = . ϑGe − ϑS 1.176 · 103 · 0.715 6 · 10−3 m

The height H of the ﬂuidised bed is yielded from the mass of the coﬀee beans MS = (1 − ε) A0 S H to be H=

MS 100 kg = = 0.378 m . (1 − ε) A0 S (1 − 0.7) · 1.4 m2 · 630 kg/m3

With this we obtain

ϑGi − ϑS = 141.7 = c0 (3.323) ϑGe − ϑS with ϑGi = 293.15 K. The equation still contains the unknown temperatures ϑGe (t) at the exit cross section and the temperature ϑS (t) of the solid. As a further balance equation MS cS

dϑmS = M˙ G cpG (ϑGi − ϑGe ) dt

(3.324)

is still available. Here, ϑmS (t) is the mean temperature of the solid. It is related to the surface temperature ϑS (t) as follows αmS (ϑmS − ϑS ) = αmG (ϑS − ϑGe ) ϑmS

=

αmG (ϑS − ϑGe ) + ϑS . αmS

With αmS ≈ λS /(dP /2) and Bi = αmG dP /λS we have ϑmS ≈

Bi (ϑS − ϑGe ) + ϑS . 2

(3.325)

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

407

From (3.323) and (3.325), by eliminating ϑS , we obtain ϑGi − ϑGe =

(ϑGi − ϑmS ) (c0 − 1) . c0 + Bi/2

Eq. (3.325) is transformed into 1 dϑmS M˙ G cpG c0 − 1 = . ϑGi − ϑmS dt MS cS c0 + Bi/2 Integration between t = 0 and t = t1 yields ln

ϑGi − ϑmS (t = 0) M˙ G cpG c0 − 1 = t1 . ϑGe − ϑmS (t = t1 ) MS cS c0 + Bi/2

Here Bi =

αmG dP αmG dP λG λG 0.0257 W/Km = 1.57 . = = N um = 36.73 λS λG λS λS 0.6 W/Km

With that we get ln

293.15 − 673.15 5 kg/s · 1.007 kJ/kgK · (141.7 − 1) = t1 , 293.15 − 303.15 100 kg · 1.70 kJ/kgK · (141.7 + 1.58/2)

and so t1 = 124.4 s ≈ 2.1 min .

3.8.6

Some empirical equations for heat and mass transfer in ﬂow through channels, packed and ﬂuidised beds

What follows is a summary of the previous equations and some supplementary equations. 1. Flow inside a tube a) Turbulent ﬂow: N um = 0.023Re0.8 P r0.4 (η/η0 )0.14 , valid for 0.5 < P r < 120, 104 < Re < 105 , L/d 10. Over a wide range of characteristic numbers it holds that 2/3 (ζ/8) ReP r d N um = 1+ L 1 + 12.7 ζ/8 (P r2/3 − 1) with the resistance factor ζ=

Δp 1 = , 2 /2) (L/d) (wm (0.78 ln Re − 1.5)2

408

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

valid for 104 ≤ Re ≤ 106 , 0.1 ≤ P r ≤ 1000, L/d > 1. All material properties are based on the arithmetic mean (ϑi + ϑe )/2 of the mean inlet temperature ϑi and the mean exit temperature ϑe , only η0 is based on the wall temperature. The Nusselt and Reynolds numbers are formed with the tube diameter. b) Laminar ﬂow: Hydrodynamically fully developed laminar ﬂow, constant wall temperature: N um =

0.0499 3.657 + tanh X + , tanh(2.264 X +1/3 + 1.7 X +2/3 ) X+

valid for 0 ≤ X + = L/(dP e) ≤ ∞, Re ≤ 2300. Laminar ﬂow that is developing hydrodynamically or thermally, (entry ﬂow) constant wall temperature: N ume 1 = , N um tanh(2.432 P r1/6 ) X +1/6 valid for 0 < X + ≤ ∞, 0 < P r ≤ ∞, Re ≤ 2300. N ume is the Nusselt number for developing ﬂow, N um is that for hydrodynamically fully developed laminar ﬂow. 2. Non-circular tubes The previous equations still hold; we merely have to replace the tube diameter d in the Nusselt and Reynolds numbers with the hydraulic diameter dh = 4A/C with the cross sectional area A through which the ﬂuid ﬂows and the wetted perimeter C. 3. Annular space between two concentric tubes With a concentric annular space there are three cases of heat transfer which have to be diﬀerentiated: 3.1: Heat is transferred at the inner tube. The outer tube is insulated. 3.2: Heat is transferred at the outer tube. The inner tube is insulated. 3.3: Heat is transferred at both the inner and outer tubes. The ﬂuid ﬂows in the axial direction in the annular space between the two tubes. The external diameter of the inner tube is di , the internal diameter of the outer tube is do . The hydraulic diameter is dh = do − di . Turbulent ﬂow: The mean Nusselt N um is based on (N um )tube of the circular tube through which the turbulent ﬂuid ﬂows according to No. 1a. Both Nusselt numbers are formed with the hydraulic diameter, N um = αm dh /λ. The Reynolds

3.8 Internal forced ﬂow

409

number is Re = wm dh/ν. It holds for the case above −0.16 di N u m = 0.86 3.1 : (N um )tube do 0.6 di N um 3.2 : = 1 − 0.14 (N um )tube do 0.86 (di /do ) + 1 − 0.14 (di /do )0.6 N u m 3.3 : = . (N um )tube 1 + (di /do ) The equations are valid over the same range as for (N um )tube from No. 1a and for 0 ≤ di /do ≤ 1. Laminar, hydrodynamically fully developed ﬂow: We have di N um − N u ∞ . =f (N um )tube − 3.657 do In the equation for laminar pipe ﬂow from Nr. 1b, the quantity X + is now formed with the hydraulic diameter, X + = L/(dh P e) with P e = wm dh /a. It holds for the case given above that 3.1 :

N u∞ = 3.657 + 1.2 (di /do )−0.8 , f (di /do ) = 1 + 0.14 (di /do )−1/2 .

3.2 :

N u∞ = 3.657 + 1.2 (di /do )1/2 ,

3.3 :

f (di /do ) = 1 + 0.14 (di /do )1/3 . 0.04 0.102 di N u∞ = 3.657 + 4 − , 0.02 + (di /do ) do f (di /do ) = 1 + 0.14 (di /do )0.1 .

The equations are valid for 0 ≤ X + ≤ ∞, Re ≤ 2300 and 0 ≤ di /do ≤ 1. 4. Flow through packed beds of spherical particles or other packing N um = fε N umS . The mean Nusselt number N um can be traced back to the Nusselt number N umS for ﬂow around a single sphere (see 3.7.4). The factor fε is dependent on the void fraction ε = VG /V , so fε = 1 + 1.5 (1 − ε) in the region 0.26 < ε < 1 . For packed beds of spheres of diﬀerent diameters or of non-spherical particles, an equivalent diameter has to be formed dP = AmP /π

410

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

with average particle surface area AmP = aP /nV ,

with aP = 6 (1 − ε)/dP ,

where aP is the speciﬁc surface area of the particle (SI units m2/m3 ) and nV is the number of particles per unit volume (SI units 1/m3 ). With that the Nusselt number can be calculated as N umS . Data on the factor fε can be found in Table 3.4. 5. Fluidised beds The Nusselt number is the same as that for ﬂow around a single sphere N umS , section 3.7.4, No.5. The Reynolds number used there is yielded from (3.318) 1.8 1/1.8 1/2 Ar ReP ∼ 1+ −1 = 19.14 12.84 with the Archimedes number Ar =

S − F d3Pg , F ν2

valid for homogeneous ﬂuidised beds for 0 ≤ ReS ≤ 104

or 0 ≤ Ar ≤ 3.0 · 107 .

The range over which this is valid for heterogeneous ﬂuidised beds is <

0 ≤ ReS ∼ 1.2 · 102

<

or 0 ≤ Ar ∼ 104 .

Over the range ReS > 1.2 · 102 or Ar ≥ 104 we have ReS ∼ = (4 Ar/3)1/2 . 6. Porous, half-inﬁnite vertical wall Constant wall temperature ϑ0 : N ux = 0.444 Ra∗1/2 x approximate range of validity: Grx∗ x2 /K ≤ 2.5 · 10−3 . It is: K g β Δϑ x Pr N ux = α x/λeﬀ , Ra∗x = Grx∗ P r = ν2 with the eﬀective thermal conductivity λeﬀ , consisting of the thermal conductivity λF of the ﬂuid and that of the porous matrix λS according to λeﬀ = ελF + (1 − ε)λS ; ε is the void fraction, K the permeability, see chapter 3.8.4. The mean Nusselt number over the lenght L of the wall is N um = αm L/λeﬀ = 2N ux=L .

3.9 Free ﬂow

3.9

411

Free ﬂow

Whilst forced ﬂow is caused by external forces, for example the pressure from a pump or blower, free ﬂows occur because of body forces in a ﬂuid in which density gradients are present. As an example of this we will consider a vertical wall with a higher temperature than the ﬂuid adjacent to it. The ﬂuid which is heated at the wall will be speciﬁcally lighter and experiences, in comparison to the ﬂuid surrounding it, a lift in the gravity ﬁeld. A free ﬂow originates. In this case the density gradients and the body force created by the gravity ﬁeld are perpendicular to each other. Another example of free ﬂow is shown in Fig. 3.46, a ﬂow of hot air is discharged as a horizontal jet which enters colder inﬁnitely extended quiescent ﬂuid. The jet moves upwards due to the buoyancy forces. The necessary prerequisites for the existence of free ﬂow are body forces and density gradients that are not directed parallel to each other. This holds for a ﬂuid ﬂowing over a heated horizontal plate.

Fig. 3.46: Deﬂection of a hot air stream by lift forces

In order to see that a free ﬂow can only exist if the density gradient and body forces are not parallel to each other, we will discuss a ﬂuid that is initially at rest, wj = 0. According to the momentum equation (3.48) it holds for this 0 = kj +

∂τji , ∂xi

where because wj = 0, according to (3.46) and (3.47), τji = −p δji . For a quiescent ﬂuid, the hydrostatic equilibrium equation follows from this as ∂p = kj . ∂xj

(3.326)

The body forces kj generate a pressure gradient. By diﬀerentiation it follows that ∂ ∂kj ∂p = kj + . ∂xi ∂xj ∂xi ∂xi As the pressure in a quiescent ﬂuid is a quantity of state, this expression can be equally represented by ∂p ∂ ∂ki = ki + . ∂xj ∂xi ∂xj ∂xj

412

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Therefore

∂ki ∂kj − ∂xi ∂xj

+

∂ ∂ kj − ki = 0 . ∂xi ∂xj

This equation is satisﬁed, if the body force possesses a potential φ, kj = −∂φ/∂xj , as the expression in the brackets disappears, and so in addition it holds that ∂ ∂ kj − ki = ∇ × k = 0 . ∂xi ∂xj

(3.327)

A necessary and suﬃcient condition for this is either the density is spatially constant or the body forces disappear or the density gradient and body forces are parallel to each other. If this is not the case, the density gradient and body forces are not in equilibrium according to (3.326). It then holds that ∂p = kj . ∂xj From the Navier-Stokes equation (3.59)

∂p ∂ 2 wj dwj +η , = kj − dt ∂xj ∂xi 2

it follows that at least one of the expressions which contain the velocity does not vanish. A ﬂow is inevitably initiated because the condition (3.326) of hydrostatic equilibrium has been violated. It can be simultaneously recognised that free ﬂow cannot exist in an incompressible ﬂuid because density gradients do not exist.

Density gradients are normally caused by temperature gradients, less often by concentration or pressure gradients. However in multicomponent mixtures the concentration diﬀerences can also create notable density gradients, so that under the preconditions named before, a free ﬂow can also develop. The body force is frequently gravity, and less often centrifugal or electromagnetic forces. The hydrostatic equilibrium in a ﬂuid does not have to be stable. As an example of this we will now consider initially quiescent, cold air over a horizontal heated plate. The condition for hydrostatic equilibrium is satisﬁed as the density gradient is parallel to the gravity force. If, as a result of a disturbance, a ball of warm air rises from the plate, it will quickly assume the pressure of its surroundings. The density of the ball of air reduces approximately adiabatically and reversibly, in accordance with p/ κ = p0/ κ0 . If the density of the ball of air is lower than that of its surroundings, or, synonymous with that, the ball is hotter than its surroundings, then it will rise even further, see for this the plot T2 > TS in Fig. 3.47. The arrangement is unstable, as a small disturbance, introduced by the rising ball of air, does not die away by itself. If, in contrast, the density of the ball of air is greater than that of its surroundings after the expansion, corresponding to the plot T2 < TS in Fig. 3.47, then it will once again sink. The stratiﬁcation is stable. This type of stable stratiﬁcation can also occur when warmer and thereby lighter air masses move over cold ground air. The heavier and often exhause gas polluted air can no longer exchange with the lighter air above it. This type of layering is known as a temperature inversion. A stable layer settles over the

3.9 Free ﬂow

413

Fig. 3.47: Reversible adiabatic expansion of hot air from p1 and initial temperature Tα1 or Tα1 , to the ambient pressure pS . a Temperature diﬀerence Tα1 −TS is large; 2 < S , a ball of air rises further. b Temperature diﬀerence Tα1 − TS is small, 2 > S , a ball of air sinks again.

area being considered and eﬀectively restricts the removal and dispersion of the pollutants. There is a risk of smog.

3.9.1

The momentum equation

The momentum equation for a Newtonian ﬂuid is yielded from Navier-Stokes equation (3.59) ∂p ∂ 2 wj dwj = kj − +η . (3.328) dt ∂xj ∂xi 2 As free ﬂow occurs because of density gradients, we will assume a variable density whilst all other material properties shall be taken as constant. Gravity will act as the body force kj = gj . In areas where the density is constant, for example far away from a heated wall, hydrostatic equilibrium is reached. Here it holds that ∂p∞ = ∞ gj , ∂xj

(3.329)

where p∞ is the hydrostatic pressure and ∞ is the associated density. Heat or mass transfer cause temperature or concentration gradients and therefore also density gradients to develop, so that the local values of pressure and density deviate from the values at hydrostatic equilibrium p = p∞ + Δp ,

= ∞ + Δ .

(3.330)

We assume that the deviations Δp and Δ are small in comparison to the values at hydrostatic equilibrium p∞ and ∞ . As an example we will consider the vertical heated wall in Fig. 3.48, at a temperature ϑ0, in front of which there is a ﬂuid, that before heating was in hydrostatic equilibrium and had a temperature ϑ∞ throughout. After a short time steady temperature and velocity proﬁles develop. These are sketched in Fig.

414

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

3.48. With (3.330), the momentum equation (3.328) is transformed into ( ∞ + Δ )

dwj ∂(p∞ + Δp) ∂ 2wj = ( ∞ + Δ ) gj − +η . dt ∂xj ∂xi 2

(3.331)

Considering that on the left hand side Δ ∞ and on the right hand side according to (3.392) ∂p∞/∂xj = ∞ gj is valid, we obtain ∞

∂Δp ∂ 2 wj dwj +η . = Δ gj − dt ∂xj ∂xi 2

(3.332)

In steady-state ﬂow, which we want to presume, we can write the term dwj ∂wj . = wi dt ∂xi In (3.332) we estimate the magnitude of the individual terms. To this we consider the buoyancy ﬂow on a ﬂat plate which is sloped at an angle ϕ to vertical. The inertia forces are of the order FI ∼ ∞

2 wref , L

(3.333)

where wref is a characteristic velocity, for example the maximum velocity in Fig. 3.48. It develops purely due to the buoyancy and is not prescribed as in the case of longitudinal ﬂow on a ﬂat plate. Its magnitude still has to be estimated. With the reference velocity the magnitude of the friction forces is yielded as wref FF ∼ η 2 . (3.334) δ

Fig. 3.48: Temperature and velocity proﬁle in free ﬂow on a heated, vertical wall

3.9 Free ﬂow

415

The buoyancy forces FB have magnitude of FB ∼ −( 0 − ∞ ) g cos ϕ .

(3.335)

In the case of a heated, vertical plate according to Fig. 3.48, the density gradient and gravity are perpendicular to each other, cos ϕ = cos 0 = 1; in contrast, on a horizontal plate the two gradients are parallel to each other and we have cos ϕ = cos π/2 = 0. The negative sign in (3.335) stems from the fact that in heating 0 − ∞ is negative, but the buoyancy force in Fig. 3.48 points in the direction of the x-coordinate. In the layer adjacent to the wall, the inertia forces are of the same magnitude as the friction forces and therefore 1/2 2 δ wref wref ν . (3.336) ∼ ν 2 or ∼ L δ L wref L In addition the buoyancy forces are also of the same magnitude as the inertia forces w2 −( 0 − ∞ ) g cos ϕ ∼ ∞ ref . L It follows from this that 1/2 −( 0 − ∞ ) g cos ϕ L wref ∼ . (3.337) ∞ This means that we can eliminate the reference velocity in (3.336), giving 1/4 δ ν2 . (3.338) ∼ L (1 − 0 / ∞ ) g cos ϕ L3 If the density change is only caused by temperature changes, under the assumption that the temperature change is suﬃciently small, it holds that ∂ 0 = ∞ + (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) . (3.339) ∂ϑ p The quantity 1 v

∂v ∂ϑ

p

1 =−

∂ ∂ϑ

=β p

is the thermal expansion coeﬃcient (SI units 1/K). It has to be put into (3.339) for the temperature ϑ∞ . We then obtain 0 − ∞ = − ∞ β∞ (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) . With ideal gases, because v = R T /p, the thermal expansion coeﬃcient is β=

1R 1 = v p T

(3.340)

416

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

and β∞ = 1/T∞ . Then with (3.340), we obtain from (3.338) δ ∼ L

ν2 β∞ (ϑ0 − ϑ∞) g L3

1/4

1 . (cos ϕ)1/4

(3.341)

Here, the dimensionless quantity β∞ (ϑ0 − ϑ∞) g L3 := Gr ν2

(3.342)

is the Grashof number Gr. For a vertical plate ϕ = 0, so δ ∼ Gr−1/4 . L

(3.343)

For large Grashof numbers Gr 1, we get δ/L 1: A boundary layer ﬂow exists. The boundary layer thickness grows according to δ ∼ L1/4 . A sloped plate requires the introduction of a modiﬁed Grashof number Grϕ =

β∞ (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) g L3 cos ϕ . ν2

This gives δ (3.344) ∼ Grϕ−1/4 . L If the plate is sloped at an angle ϕ to the vertical, a boundary layer forms once again, if Grϕ 1, whilst on a horizontal plate, ϕ = π/2, a boundary layer cannot exist. As we can see from (3.333) and (3.335), the inertia and buoyancy forces are of equal magnitude, if −( 0 − ∞) g cos ϕ ∼1 2 ∞ wref /L is valid. With (3.340) and the Reynolds number wref L/ν, we can also write this as β∞ (ϑ0 − ϑ∞) g L3 cos ϕ Grϕ = ∼1 . (3.345) 2 2 Re2 (wref L/ν) ν Therefore the following approximation is valid: If Grϕ /Re2 1, then the buoyancy forces will be much smaller then the inertia forces. The ﬂow will be determined by the inertia and friction forces. If, however, Grϕ /Re2 1, then the buoyancy forces will be much larger than the inertia force. The ﬂow will be determined by the buoyancy and friction forces.

3.9 Free ﬂow

3.9.2

417

Heat transfer in laminar ﬂow on a vertical wall

We will now deal with free ﬂow on a vertical, ﬂat wall whose temperature ϑ0 is constant and larger than the temperature in the semi-inﬁnite space. The coordinate origin lies, in accordance with Fig. 3.48, on the lower edge, the coordinate x runs along the wall, with y normal to it. Steady ﬂow will be presumed. All material properties are constant. The density will only be assumed as temperature dependent in the buoyancy term, responsible for the free ﬂow, in the momentum equation, in all other terms it is assumed to be constant. These assumptions from Oberbeck (1879) and Boussinesq (1903), [3.55], [3.56] are also known as the Boussinesq approximation; although it would be more correct to speak of the Oberbeck-Boussinesq approximation. It takes into account that the locally variable density is a prerequisite for free ﬂow. The momentum equation (3.331) in the x-direction, taking into consideration that on the left hand side Δ ∞ , on the right hand side p∞ + Δp = p, ∞ + Δ = and gj = −g, is now ∞wx

∂p ∂ 2wx ∂wx ∂wx + ∞ wy = − g − +η . ∂x ∂y ∂x ∂y 2

(3.346)

The momentum equation in the direction of the y-axis is reduced to ∂p =0 , ∂y

(3.347)

as already shown in the boundary layer simpliﬁcations in section 3.5, because the pressure at a point x is constant perpendicular to the wall. As the core ﬂow is quiescent, the condition (3.326) for hydrostatic equilibrium is valid there ∂p = ∞ g , ∂x and with that the momentum equation (3.346) simpliﬁes to −

wx

∂wx ∂wx ∞ − ∂ 2 wx + wy = g+ν . ∂x ∂y ∞ ∂y2

(3.348)

(3.349)

As we have presumed small density changes, we have ∂ (ϑ − ϑ∞ ) = ∞ − ∞ β∞ (ϑ − ϑ∞ ) = ∞ + ∂ϑ p with the thermal expansion coeﬃcient 1 ∂v 1 ∂ =− =β , v ∂ϑ p ∂ϑ p that has to be put in at the temperature ϑ∞ . With this we get the following term in the momentum equation (3.349) ∞ − = β∞ (ϑ − ϑ∞ ) . ∞

418

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

This leaves the following system of equations to solve: The continuity equation ∂wx ∂wy + =0 , ∂x ∂y the momentum equation wx

∂wx ∂wx ∂ 2 wx + wy = g β∞ (ϑ − ϑ∞ ) + ν ∂x ∂y ∂y2

(3.350)

(3.351)

and the energy equation wx

∂ϑ ∂ϑ ∂ 2ϑ + wy =a 2 . ∂x ∂y ∂y

(3.352)

The dissipated energy is neglected here. The boundary conditions are y = 0 : wx = wy = 0 ; y → ∞ : wx = 0 ;

ϑ = ϑ0

ϑ = ϑ∞ .

(3.353)

In order to solve this, we introduce a stream function ψ(x, y), cf. (3.180): wx =

∂ψ ∂y

and

wy = −

∂ψ , ∂x

through which the continuity equation (3.350) is satisﬁed identically. The momentum equation (3.351) is transformed into ∂ψ ∂ 2 ψ ∂ψ ∂ 2 ψ ∂3 ψ − = g β∞ (ϑ − ϑ∞ ) + ν . ∂y ∂y ∂x ∂x ∂y 2 ∂y 3

(3.354)

As the boundary layer thickness according to (3.343) at a point x is given by δ ∼ x/Grx1/4

with Grx =

β∞ (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) g x3 , ν2

the y coordinate is normalised with the local boundary layer thickness, just as for ﬂow along a ﬂat plate, introducing a dimensionless coordinate normal to the wall η + :=

y y = δ x

Grx 4

1/4 = g(x, y) .

(3.355)

The factor of 4 is introduced in agreement with the similarity solution from Ostrach [3.57], because through this, no fractions will appear as factors in the following equations. A characteristic velocity wref is found from (3.337) and (3.340) for the vertical wall (ϕ = π/2) to be 1/2 1/2 ν2 wref = 2 β∞ (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) g x = 2 Grx 2 . (3.356) x The factor of 2 is once again chosen in agreement with Ostrach. With this we obtain for the stream function y y wx y (3.357) d ψ = wx dy = wref δ wref δ 0

0

3.9 Free ﬂow

or

ψ=2

ν2 Grx 2 x

1/2

419

x (Grx /4)1/4

η

+

wx+ dη + .

(3.358)

0

Therefore we now have ψ = 4ν

Grx 4

1/4 η

+

wx+ dη + = 4 ν

Grx 4

1/4 f (η + ) .

(3.359)

0

It is also assumed here that the velocity proﬁle wx+ = wx /wref can be represented as a function of the boundary layer coordinate η + . The velocities are yielded from this as wx = and wy = −

∂ψ ν = ∂x x

∂ψ 2ν = Grx1/2 f (η + ) ∂y x

Grx 4

1/4

+ + η f (η ) − 3 f (η + ) .

(3.360)

In a corresponding way we introduce a normalised temperature ϑ+ :=

ϑ − ϑ∞ = ϑ+ (η + ) . ϑ0 − ϑ∞

(3.361)

Using these equations the momentum equation (3.354) can be transformed into f + 3 f f − 2 (f )2 + ϑ+ = 0

(3.362)

and the energy equation (3.352) into

ϑ+ + 3 P r f ϑ + = 0 .

(3.363)

In place of the partial diﬀerential equations (3.350) to (3.352), two ordinary non-linear diﬀerential equations appear. The continuity equation is no longer required because it is fulﬁlled by the stream function. The solution has to satisfy the following boundary conditions: η+ = 0 : f = f = 0 ; η+ → ∞ : f = 0 ;

ϑ+ = 1

ϑ+ → 0 .

These equations were ﬁrst solved by Pohlhausen [3.58] for air with a Prandtl number P r = 0.733 by series expansion and later numerically by Ostrach [3.47] for a wide range of Prandtl numbers, 0.008 35 ≤ P r ≤ 1 000. Fig. 3.49 illustrates the normalised velocities in the form 1 wx x = f (η + ) ν 2 Grx1/2 and Fig. 3.50 the normalised temperatures ϑ+ (η + ) based on the calculations by Ostrach [3.57]. The heat transfer coeﬃcients are yielded in the usual manner from the temperature proﬁles ∂ϑ α (ϑ0 − ϑ∞) = q˙ = −λ . ∂y y=0

420

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

Fig. 3.49: Velocities in free ﬂow on a vertical wall, according to [3.57]

In which

∂ϑ ∂y

Fig. 3.50: Temperatures in free ﬂow on a vertical wall, according to [3.57]

y=0

dϑ+ ∂η + = (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) dη + ∂y y=0 1/4 + 1 Grx dϑ = (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) x 4 dη + η+ =0

(3.364)

and therefore N ux =

αx = λ

Grx 4

1/4

dϑ+ dη +

= η+ =0

Grx 4

1/4 ϕ(P r) .

(3.365)

The temperature increase (dϑ+ /dη + )η+ =0 is, as Fig. 3.50 also shows, a function ϕ of the Prandtl number P r. The numerical results from Ostrach have been reproduced by Le F`evre [3.59] through an interpolation equation of the following form, which deviates from the exact numerical solution by no more than 0.5 %: ϕ(P r) =

0.849 P r1/2 (1 + 2.006 P r1/2 + 2.034 P r)

1/4

.

(3.366)

The solution includes the following special cases: In the limiting case P r → 0 we get ϕ(P r) = 0.849 P r1/2 , and with that &1/4 % N ux = 0.600 Grx P r2 . In this case the friction forces are negligible compared to the inertia and buoyancy forces, so the heat transfer coeﬃcient is independent of the viscosity of the ﬂuid. In the limiting case of P r → ∞, we get ϕ(P r) = 0.7109 P r1/4 , and with that N ux = 0.5027 (Grx P r)1/4 . The inertia forces are negligible in comparison to the friction and buoyancy forces.

3.9 Free ﬂow

421

The mean heat transfer coeﬃcient αm is yielded by integration of (3.365) to be 1 αm = L

L

1/4 L dx λ β∞ (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) g α dx = ϕ(P r) . L 4 ν2 x1/4

0

0

The mean Nusselt number is 1/4 αm L 4 4 Gr ϕ(P r) = N ux (x = L) . = N um = λ 3 4 3

(3.367)

Here the Grashof number is formed with the length L of the vertical wall. The equation holds, like (3.365), only for laminar ﬂow. This develops, as experiments have shown, for Rayleigh numbers Gr P r ≤ 109 . An equation which reproduces measured and calculated values in laminar and turbulent ﬂow on vertical plates and cylinders for all Rayleigh and Prandtl numbers has been communicated by Churchill and Chu [3.60]. In the region of laminar ﬂow Gr P r ≤ 109 it is certainly less accurate than the equation from Le F`evre we discussed earlier, and it reads +2 0.387 Ra1/6 N um = 0.825 + . (3.368) 8/27 [1 + (0.492/P r)9/16 ] Here the mean Nusselt and Rayleigh numbers are formed with the height of the plate L: N um =

αm L , λ

Ra = Gr P r =

β∞ (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) g L3 Pr . ν2

The equation also holds for vertical cylinders, if d/L ≥ 35 Gr−1/4 . It is also valid for constant heat ﬂux, this merely requires that the factor of 0.492 in the denominator of (3.368) be replaced by 0.437.

3.9.3

Some empirical equations for heat transfer in free ﬂow

In the following some further empirical correlations, besides the relationships (3.365), (3.367) and (3.368) for a vertical plate which we have already discussed, for heat transfer in free ﬂow will be communicated. 1. Horizontal plate The characteristic length in the mean Nusselt and the Rayleigh number is an equivalent length L = A/U made up of the heat transfer area A and the perimeter U of the external edges of the plate. We can diﬀerentiate

422

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

between the following cases: Upper side of the plate is heated or lower side is cooled in accordance with Figs. 3.51 and 3.52: N um = 0.54 Ra1/4

valid for 104 ≤ Ra ≤ 107

N um = 0.15 Ra1/3

valid for 107 ≤ Ra ≤ 1011 .

Fig. 3.51: Flat plate. Upper side heated

Fig. 3.52: Flat plate. Lower side cooled

Upper side of the plate cooled or lower side heated in accordance with Figs. 3.53 and 3.54: valid for 105 ≤ Ra ≤ 1010 .

N um = 0.27 Ra1/4

Fig. 3.53: Flat plate. Upper side cooled

Fig. 3.54: Flat plate. Lower side heated

2. Inclined plate Equation (3.368) holds for laminar and turbulent ﬂow. The acceleration due to gravity g has to be replaced by its component parallel to the wall g cos ϕ, in which ϕ is the angle of incline to the vertical. The equation is now valid for inclined plates, as long as ϕ ≤ π/3 = 60◦ . 3. Horizontal cylinder of diameter d and length L d: N um =

0.60 +

+2

0.387 Ra1/6

[1 + (0.559/P r)9/16 ]

8/27

,

valid for 0 ≤ Ra ≤ ∞. It means that: N um =

αm d ; λ

Ra = Gr P r =

β∞ (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) g d3 Pr . ν2

3.9 Free ﬂow

4. Sphere of diameter d: N um = 2 +

423

0.589 Ra1/4 [1 + (0.469/P r)9/16 ]

4/9

,

valid for P r ≥ 0.7 and 0 ≤ Ra 1011 . This means that: N um =

αm d ; λ

β∞ (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) g d3 Pr . ν2

Ra = Gr P r =

5. Vertical plate being heated with constant heat ﬂux: 0.616 Rax1/5

N ux =

Pr 0.8 + P r

1/5 ,

valid for 0.1 ≤ P r ≤ ∞; Rax ≤ 109 . This means that: N ux =

3.9.4

αx ; λ

Rax = Grx P r =

β∞ q˙ g x4 Pr . ν2 λ

Mass transfer in free ﬂow

In multicomponent mixtures density gradients can exist not only due to temperature and pressure gradients but also because of gradients in the composition. As long as the density gradient and body forces are not parallel to each other, a free ﬂow develops which causes mass transfer. The mass transfer coeﬃcients can be calculated from the equations given earlier. The only change is replacing the Nusselt number by the Sherwood number. The Grashof number is formed with the density diﬀerence ( ∞ − 0 ) g L3 Gr = . (3.369) ∞ ν 2 In binary mixtures, when the density gradient is created by the concentration gradient alone, it follows from = (p, T, ξ) that ∂ 0 = ∞ + (ξ0 − ξ∞ ) . (3.370) ∂ξ p,T We call

1 v

∂v ∂ξ

T,p

1 =−

∂ ∂ξ

:= γ T,p

the mass expansion coeﬃcient. With this we get 0 = ∞ − ∞ γ∞ (ξ0 − ξ∞ ) .

424

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

The Grashof number (3.369) is transformed into Gr =

γ∞ (ξ0 − ξ∞ ) g L3 . ν2

(3.371)

With mixtures of ideal gases the mass expansion coeﬃcient can be found from the thermal equation of state pv = RT with the speciﬁc gas constant of a binary mixture R = R1 ξ + R2 (1 − ξ) to be γ = (R1 − R2 )/R , ˜ i Ri , the simple relationships from which, with the universal gas constant Rm = M γ= and γ∞ =

˜1 ˜2 − M M ˜2 ξ + M ˜ 1 (1 − ξ) M ˜2 − M ˜1 M ˜ 1 (1 − ξ∞ ) ˜ 2 ξ∞ + M M

(3.372)

follow. In simultaneous heat and mass transfer in binary mixtures, mean mass transfer coeﬃcients can likewise be found using the equations from the previous sections. Once again this requires that the mean Nusselt number N um is replaced by the mean Sherwood number Shm , and instead of the Grashof number a modiﬁed Grashof number is introduced, in which the density (p, T, ξ) is developed into a Taylor series, ∂ ∂ 0 = ∞ + (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) + (ξ0 − ξ∞ ) , ∂T p,ξ ∂ξ p,T so 0 = ∞ − ∞ β∞ (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) − ∞ γ∞ (ξ0 − ξ∞ ) is put into the Grashof number (3.369). The modiﬁed Grashof number obtained is β∞ (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) g L3 γ∞ (ξ0 − ξ∞) g L3 + . (3.373) Gr = ν2 ν2 As Saville and Churchill [3.61] showed, the results obtained with this method are only suﬃciently accurate if the Schmidt and Prandtl numbers of the mixtures are the same. In any other case the mutual inﬂuence of the mass transfer and the ﬂow ﬁeld will not be suﬃciently taken into account.

3.10 Overlapping of free and forced ﬂow

3.10

425

Overlapping of free and forced ﬂow

In the discussion of forced ﬂow we neglected the inﬂuence of free ﬂow and in reverse the eﬀect of forced ﬂow was neglected in our handling of free ﬂow. However, frequently a free ﬂow will overlap a forced ﬂow as a result of density gradients. As we have already seen in 3.9.1, eq. (3.345), the decisive quantity for this is Gr/Re2 . If it is of the order 1, the buoyancy and inertia forces are equal, whilst for Gr/Re2 1 the forced, and for Gr/Re2 1, the free ﬂow predominates. Forced and free ﬂow can, depending on the direction of the inertia and buoyancy forces, either mutually stimulate or dampen each other. In a forced ﬂow overlapping a free ﬂow, the heat and mass transfer can either be improved or inhibited. As an example of this we will look at a heated plate, Fig. 3.55. A free ﬂow in the upwards direction develops, which can be strengthened Fig. 3.55a, or weakened, Fig. 3.55b, by a forced ﬂow generated by a blower. Experiments have shown that the heat transfer coeﬃcient can be calculated well by using equations of the form N un = | N unC ± N unF | , (3.374) where N uC is the Nusselt number of the forced convection and N uF is that of the free ﬂow. The positive sign is valid when the two ﬂows are in the same direction. This is replaced by a negative sign if they are ﬂowing countercurrent to each other. The exponent n is generally n = 3. For longitudinal ﬂow over horizontal plates, cylinders or spheres n = 4 is used. A corresponding relationship to (3.331) holds for mass transfer; this merely means replacing the Nusselt by the Sherwood number.

Fig. 3.55: Overlapping of free and forced ﬂow. a Strengthening b Weakening of the free ﬂow by the forced ﬂow

Example 3.17: A vertical metal plate of 0.5 m height and 1 m depth has a temperature of 170 ◦ C. Calculate the heat ﬂow by free ﬂow to the surrounding air, which is at a temperature of 90 ◦ C. In the solution the material properties should all be based on the mean boundary layer temperature (170 ◦ C + 90 ◦ C)/2 = 130 ◦ C. The following material properties are given: thermal conductivity λ = 0.0337 W/Km, kinematic viscosity ν = 2.685 · 10−5 m2 /s, Prandtl number P r = 0.699. Furthermore β∞ = 1/T∞ = 2.754 · 10−3 K−1 .

426

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

We have Gr =

β∞ (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) g L3 2.754 · 10−3 1/K · (170 − 90) K · 9.81 m/s2 · 0.53 m3 = , 2 ν (2.685 · 10−5 )2 m4 /s2

and so Gr = 3.748 · 108

and GrP r = 2.620 · 108 .

The ﬂow is laminar, so (3.367) is valid, with ϕ(P r) according to (3.366) 1/4 4 4 Gr N um = N u(x = L) = ϕ(P r) 3 3 4 =

αm Q˙

3.11

4 3

3.748 · 108 4

= N um

1/4

0.849 · 0.6991/2 = 65.44 (1 + 2.006 · 0.6991/2 + 2.034 · 0.699)1/4

λ 0.0337 W/Km = 65.44 = 4.41 W/m2 K L 0.5

= αm A (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) = 4.41 W/m2 K · 0.5 m · 1 m · (170 − 90) K = 176 W .

Compressible ﬂows

In free ﬂow the buoyancy is caused by a density change together with a body force, whilst forced laminar and turbulent ﬂows have, up until now, been dealt with under the assumption of constant density. In liquids, this assumption of constant density is only in good approximation satisﬁed when the liquid is not close to its critical state. In the case of gases a moderate velocity with Mach number Ma = w/wS 1 has to be additionally presumed. If the velocity of the gas is large, or the ﬂuid is close to its critical state, the density of a volume element of the material changes in the course of its motion. This is described by d /dt = 0. Therefore, in steady ﬂow the density is locally variable. As a result of heating through dissipation of kinetic energy, local temperature and therefore local density changes can exist in adiabatic ﬂows. A ﬂow, in which the density of a volume element of the material changes in the course of its motion is known as compressible. In the following we will discuss of heat transfer phenomena in these compressible ﬂows. We will restrict ourselves to steady ﬂows. As the thermodynamic temperature T dependent velocity of sound wS plays a role in this section, it is reasonable to use the thermodynamic temperature T rather than the temperature ϑ in calculations.

3.11.1

The temperature ﬁeld in a compressible ﬂow

In order to explain the basic properties of compressible ﬂow, we will look at a two-dimensional, steady, boundary layer ﬂow of a pure ﬂuid. In a change from

3.11 Compressible ﬂows

427

the previous discussion, in addition to the density, the viscosity and thermal conductivity will also be locally variable. The continuity equation is ∂( wx ) ∂( wy ) + =0 . ∂x ∂y

(3.375)

The momentum equation (3.58), with the boundary layer simpliﬁcations explained in section 3.5, is transformed into

dwx ∂p ∂τxy = − + , dt ∂x ∂y ∂p = 0 ∂y

(3.376)

with

dwx ∂wx ∂wx ∂wx = wx + wy and τxy = η . dt ∂x ∂y ∂y With the boundary layer simpliﬁcations from section 3.5, the enthalpy form of the energy equation (3.83) becomes

dh ∂ q˙ dp =− + +φ dt ∂y dt

(3.377)

with dp/dt = wx ∂p/∂x, q˙ = q˙y and the viscous dissipation φ = η (∂wx /∂y)2 = τxy ∂wx /∂y. Multiplication of the momentum equation (3.333) with wx and addition to the energy equation (3.334) yields, after introduction of the so-called total enthalpy, w2 htot := h + x , (3.378) 2 the relationship ∂ dhtot ˙ . (3.379) = (wx τxy − q) dt ∂y Here it is possible to replace the heat ﬂux by the enthalpy h = h(p, T ), then taking ∂p/∂y = 0 and q˙ = −λ ∂T /∂y into account, it holds that ∂h ∂T q˙ = cp = −cp . ∂y ∂y λ

(3.380)

Then, together with (3.378) and with λ/cp = η/P r it follows that q˙ = −

∂wx η ∂htot η λ ∂h =− + wx cp ∂y P r ∂y Pr ∂y

or

η ∂htot 1 + wx τxy . P r ∂y Pr With that, the energy balance (3.379) becomes dhtot ∂htot P r − 1 ∂(wx τxy ) 1 ∂ η , = + dt Pr ∂y P r ∂y ∂y q˙ = −

(3.381)

(3.382)

428

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

when we presume constant laminar or turbulent Prandtl numbers. Equation (3.382) is suggested, for reasons of simplicity, for the investigation of laminar and turbulent ﬂows of air or other gases, because they have Prandtl numbers P r ≈ 1. Then the ﬁrst term on the right hand side, which describes the inﬂuence of the work done by the shear stress, disappears. With this equation (3.382) simpliﬁes to ∂htot ∂ dhtot η . (3.383) = dt ∂y ∂y This equation has two important particular solutions: a) Adiabatic ﬂow on a solid wall For this q(y ˙ = 0) = 0, and as follows from (3.380) and (3.378) we also have ∂htot =0 . (3.384) ∂y y=0 Further, at the edge of the boundary layer htot = htotδ = const .

(3.385)

At the leading edge of the plate htot(x = 0, y) = const .

(3.386)

A solution of (3.383) which satisﬁes these boundary conditions is htot (x, y) = const .

(3.387)

Therefore

wx2 w2 = hδ + δ . 2 2 From this, with h − hδ = cp(T − Tδ ) we obtain 2 1 wδ2 wx T . =1+ 1− Tδ cp T δ 2 wδ htot := h +

(3.388)

(3.389)

The temperature proﬁle in the boundary layer of an adiabatic ﬂow, under the assumption that P r = 1, is linked with the velocity proﬁle. The relationship is valid independent of the pressure drop ∂p/∂x. It can be rearranged for ideal gases, as the associated velocity of sound at the temperature Tδ for these gases is " wSδ = κ R Tδ = cp (κ − 1) Tδ and therefore cp T δ =

2 wSδ . κ−1

(3.390)

3.11 Compressible ﬂows

429

This means that for ideal gases, (3.389) is transformed into 2 wx κ−1 T =1+ Ma 2δ 1 − Tδ 2 wδ

(3.391)

with the Mach number Ma δ = wδ /wSδ . Fig. 3.56 illustrates the dependence of the temperature proﬁle T /Tδ on the velocities wx /wδ according to (3.391). If the velocity proﬁle wx /wδ of incompressible ﬂow in (3.391) is approximated by Blasius’ solution of the plate boundary layer, section 3.7.1.1, we obtain the temperatures shown in Fig. 3.57. The diagram only represents the approximate temperature pattern. As we can see from (3.348), at the wall y = 0, because wx = 0, the temperature is T0 = Te , which is also known as the adiabatic wall temperature or the eigentemperature Te : κ−1 Te Ma 2δ . =1+ Tδ 2

(3.392)

It is the one temperature attained at the surface of an adiabatic, insulated body in a ﬂow. Through the relationship (3.392) the strong heating of the boundary layer at large Mach numbers becomes evident. Some eigentemperatures Te are reproduced in Table 3.6. Table 3.6: Eigentemperatures of an air ﬂow of Tδ = 300 K, κ = 1.4 Ma δ

0

1

2

3

5

Te /K

300

360

540

840

1800

The eigentemperature is identical to the temperature at the stagnation point in a ﬂow at velocity wδ on a body. It holds for this, that hSt = hδ +

Fig. 3.56: Temperature and velocity proﬁle in a compressible ﬂow of ideal gases, according to (3.348)

wδ2 , 2

Fig. 3.57: Temperature proﬁles in compressible ﬂow of ideal gases. Adiabatic wall

430

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

from which, with hSt − hδ = cp (TSt − Tδ ) the relationship wδ2 κ−1 TSt =1+ =1+ Ma 2δ Tδ 2 c p Tδ 2

(3.393)

which agrees with (3.392), follows. The result (3.392) was only valid under the precondition that the Prandtl number of a gas which is presumed to be ideal is P r = 1. In the general case of ﬂow of an ideal gas with a Prandtl number P r = 1, a diﬀerent eigentemperature is present which is still dependent on the Prandtl number. In order to calculate this the so-called “Recovery Factor” r is introduced. It is deﬁned by Te − Tδ Te − T δ = 2 =r , (3.394) TSt − Tδ wδ /2 cp which is still dependent on the Prandtl number. By deﬁnition, r = 1 for P r = 1. A solution of the boundary layer equations by Eckert and Drake [3.62], for longitudinal ﬂow along a plate, yielded, for laminar ﬂow in the region 0.6 < P r < 15 , the recovery factor can be approximated well by √ r∼ = Pr ,

(3.395)

and for turbulent ﬂow in the region 0.25 < P r < 10 by

r∼ =

√ 3

Pr .

(3.396)

b) Flow with vanishing pressure drop ∂p/∂x = 0 In a ﬂow with a vanishing pressure drop ∂p/∂x the momentum equation (3.376) simpliﬁes to dwx ∂wx ∂τxy ∂ η . (3.397) = = dy ∂y ∂y ∂y Its form agrees with the energy equation (3.382) for a ﬂuid with P r = 1 ∂htot ∂ dhtot η . = dt ∂y ∂y Therefore a particular solution htot = a0 wx + a1 ,

(3.398)

3.11 Compressible ﬂows

431

exists, as wx (x, y) is a solution of the momentum equation, then htot (x, y) is a solution of the energy equation. The constants a0 and a1 have to be determined from the following boundary conditions: htot (y = 0) = h0 htot (y = δ) = htotδ .

(3.399)

With these the solution of (3.398) becomes wx (htotδ − h0) htot − h0 = wδ or with htot = h + wx2 /2:

wx w2 cp (T − T0 ) + x = 2 wδ

(3.400)

w2 cp (Tδ − T0) + δ 2

,

where T0 is the wall temperature. Together with (3.390) and the Mach number Ma δ = wδ /wSδ , this yields the relationship valid for ideal gases with a Prandtl number P r = 1 wx T0 Tδ − T0 wx κ − 1 T 2 wx 1− . (3.401) = + + Ma δ Tδ Tδ Tδ wδ 2 wδ wδ Again in this case the temperature proﬁle is clearly linked to the velocity proﬁle. In the event of very low Mach numbers Ma → 0, i.e. incompressible ﬂow of an ideal gas, this yields wx . (3.402) T = T0 + (Tδ − T0) wδ From that follows the heat ﬂux

q˙ = α (T0 − Tδ ) = −λ With this we obtain λ α= wδ

∂wx ∂y

= y=0

∂T ∂y

. y=0

λ τ0 . η wδ

Still taking into account the deﬁnition of the friction factor cf := τ0 /( wδ2 /2) and introducing the Reynolds number Re = wδ x/ν, provides us with the already well known analogy between heat and momentum exchange αx cf = N ux = Re , valid for P r = 1 . (3.403) λ 2 As a special case, (3.401) also includes the solution for an adiabatic, insulated ﬂat wall. This is ∂wx ∂T ∂T = =0 . ∂y y=0 ∂wx y=0 ∂y y=0

432

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

As the velocity gradient (∂wx /∂y)y=0 at the wall is not zero, (∂T /∂wx )y=0 has to disappear. By diﬀerentiating (3.401) we ﬁnd 1 ∂T Tδ − T0 1 κ−1 =0= + . (3.404) Ma 2δ ∂wx y=0 Tδ wδ 2 wδ From which we obtain the wall temperature κ−1 T0 =1+ Ma 2δ . Tδ 2 As a comparison with (3.392) shows, it is equal to the eigentemperature Te . Fig. 3.58 illustrates the dependence of the temperatures T /Tδ according to (3.401), on the velocities wx /wδ . The temperature proﬁle q˙ = 0, T0 = Te is the bold line in Fig. 3.58. If heat ﬂows from the wall to the ﬂuid, the wall temperature T0 has to lie above the eigentemperature Te , so κ−1 T0 >1+ Ma 2δ Tδ 2

(heating the ﬂuid)

whilst in cooling the wall temperature T0 has to be lower than the eigentemperature Te , and so it holds that κ−1 T0 <1+ Ma 2δ Tδ 2

(cooling the ﬂuid) .

The curve T0 = Te for adiabatic ﬂow separates the line T0 > Te for heating

Fig. 3.58: Temperature and velocity proﬁles in compressible ﬂow of an ideal gas; ∂p/∂x1 = 0; according to (3.401)

the ﬂuid from that T0 < Te for cooling. In the limiting case of Ma δ = 0, (3.401) is transformed into the straight dotted line. In order to diﬀerentiate the three cases — heating, cooling or an adiabatic wall — a heat transfer parameter is introduced into (3.359) ϑ+ :=

Te − T0 . Te − Tδ

(3.405)

Its sign tells us whether the wall is adiabatically insulated, or if the ﬂuid is being heated or cooled. In heating we have T0 > Te and ϑ+ < 0, for the

3.11 Compressible ﬂows

433

adiabatic, insulated wall T0 = Te and ϑ+ = 0 and in cooling T0 < Te and ϑ+ > 0. A simple relationship exists between the wall temperature T0 and the heat transfer parameter, because it follows from (3.405) that Te Te T0 + Te + = −ϑ +ϑ =1+ − 1 (1 − ϑ+ ) . Tδ Tδ Tδ Tδ With the eigentemperature according to (3.392) we can write for this T0 κ−1 Ma 2δ (1 − ϑ+ ) . =1+ Tδ 2

(3.406)

Inserting (3.406) into (3.401) yields an alternative form of (3.401), which now contains the heat transfer parameter: wx κ−1 wx T 2 + 1 − 1 − ϑ . (3.407) =1+ + Ma δ Tδ 2 wδ wδ According to these equations, which are valid for P r = 1 and ideal gases, the temperature proﬁle can be described by the velocity proﬁle and the parameter ϑ+ . If we put in Blasius’ solution from section 3.7.1.1, as an approximation for the velocity proﬁle we obtain, for example, the temperature proﬁle in Fig. 3.59 for Ma δ = 2, as a function of the distance from the wall η + . This only reproduces an approximate temperature proﬁle because of the simpliﬁcations made.

Fig. 3.59: Temperature proﬁle in a compressible ﬂow of ideal gas. Curve parameter ϑ+ = (Te −T0 )/(Te −Tδ ). In heating T0 > Te and ϑ+ < 0, in cooling T0 < Te and ϑ+ > 0

3.11.2

Calculation of heat transfer

The heat ﬂux transferred from a surface at a given temperature ϑ0 = ϑe is obtained by solving the momentum and energy equations, taking into account the dissipation. This requires the introduction of boundary layer coordinates, as explained

434

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

in section 3.1.1 about the solution of boundary layer equations. In addition to this the partial diﬀerential equations are transformed into ordinary diﬀerential equations, which can, however, be solved numerically. A solution of this type has been given by Eckert and Drake [3.62], for the incompressible ﬂow of a ﬂuid along a plate with a constant wall temperature. According to this the heat ﬂux transferred locally from the plate can be described in good approximation by 1/3 q(x) ˙ = 0.332 Re1/2 x Pr

λ (T0 − Te ) valid for 0.6 ≤ P r ≤ 10 . x

(3.408)

This result suggests the heat transfer coeﬃcient α can be deﬁned by q˙ := α (T0 − Te) . The local Nusselt number formed with this heat transfer coeﬃcient αx 1/3 N ux = = 0.332 Re1/2 x Pr λ

(3.409)

(3.410)

agrees with that found for incompressible ﬂow, (3.176), for 0.6 < P r < 10. To calculate the heat transferred, the heat transfer coeﬃcient is found, according to a suggestion from Eckert and Drake [3.62], from the Nusselt relationships and then multiplied by the diﬀerence between the wall temperature and the eigentemperature. As the Nusselt relationships were derived under the assumption of constant material properties, but in reality the density, viscosity and thermal conductivity of a compressible ﬂow will change strongly due to the large temperature variation, the material properties should be those based on a reference temperature Tref . Eckert [3.63] suggested the following empirical equation which is based on numerical calculations Tref = T∞ + 0.5 (T0 − T∞) + 0.22 (Te − T∞ ) ,

(3.411)

where T∞ is the temperature at a great distance from the wall. In boundary layer ﬂow it is equal to the temperature Tδ at the edge of the boundary layer. The eigentemperature is obtained from (3.394), with the recovery factor according to (3.395) or (3.396). In this way the heat transfer in laminar or turbulent ﬂow can be calculated. Example 3.18: Air at pressure 0.1 MPa and temperature 20 ◦ C ﬂows at a velocity of 600 m/s over a 1 m long and 1 m wide, ﬂat plate whose temperature is maintained at 60 ◦ C. Calculate the heat transferred. The following properties for air are given: kinematic viscosity ν(40 ◦ C) = 17.23·10−6 m2 /s, ν(73 ◦ C) = 20.6·10−6 m2 /s, ν(74.9 ◦ C) = 20.77·10−6 m2 /s, Prandtl number P r(74.9 ◦ C) = 0.702, thermal conductivity λ(73 ◦ C) = 0.0297 W/Km, λ(74.9 ◦ C) = 0.0299 W/Km, adiabatic exponent κ = 1.4, gas constant R = 0.2872 kJ/kgK. First of all we calculate the Reynolds number at the end of the plate, to ascertain whether the ﬂow there is laminar or turbulent. The reference temperature for the material properties is (ϑ0 + ϑδ )/2 = (60 + 20) ◦ C/2 = 40 ◦ C. With that Re =

wm L 600 m/s · 1 m = = 3.482 · 107 . ν 17.23 · 10−6 m2 /s

3.11 Compressible ﬂows

435

The ﬂow at the end of the plate is turbulent, at the start of the plate it is laminar. Furthermore wSδ = κ RTδ = 1.4 · 0.2872 · 103 Nm/kgK · 293.15 K = 343.3 m/s and Ma δ =

wδ 600 m/s = 1.748 . = wS δ 343.3 m/s

The stagnation point temperature, according to (3.350), is

κ−1 1.4 − 1 TSt = Tδ 1 + Ma 2δ = 293.15 K 1 + 1.7482 = 472.3 K . 2 2 The eigentemperature follows from (3.394) with the recovery factor according to (3.395) in the region of laminar ﬂow with the estimated value P r ≈ 0.7: √ √ Te = P r (TSt − Tδ ) + Tδ = 0.7 · (472.2 − 293.15) K + 293.15 K = 443 K . For this the Prandtl number is P r = 0.698; the assumption P r ≈ 0.7 does not have to be corrected. The reference temperature Tref for the material properties, according to (3.411), is Tref = 293.15 K + 0.5 · (333.15 − 293.15) K + 0.22 · (443 − 293.15) K = 346.12 K = 73 ◦ C . The critical Reynolds number for the laminar-turbulent transition is Recr = from which xcr =

wδ xcr = 5 · 105 , ν

5 · 105 · 20.6 · 10−6 m2 /s = 0.0172 m . 600 m/s

The mean Nusselt number, the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient and the mean heat ﬂow in the laminar region according to section 3.7.4, No. 1, are N um, lam αm, lam Q˙ lam

1/2

= 0.664 · Recr P r 1/3 = 0.664 · (5 · 105 )1/2 · 0.7021/3 = 417.3 = N um, lam

λ 0.0297 W/Km = 417.3 · = 720 W/m2 K . xcr 0.0172 m

= αm, lam A (ϑ0 − ϑe ) = 720 W/m2 K · 0.0172 m · 1 m · (333.15 − 443) K = −1.361 kW .

In the √ turbulent √ section we will once again estimate P r ≈ 0.7. The recovery factor is then r = 3 P r = 3 0.7 = 0.8879. The eigentemperature follows from (3.394) with (3.396) as √ 3 Te = P r (TSt − Tδ ) + Tδ = 0.8879 · (472.2 − 293.15) K + 293.15 K = 452 K = 179 ◦ C . The Prandtl number for this is P r = 0.698; the original guess does not have to be corrected. The reference temperature for the material properties, according to (3.411), is Tref = 293.15 K + 0.5 · (333.15 − 293.15) K + 0.22 · (452 − 293.15) K = 348.1 K = 74.9 ◦ C . The Reynolds number in the turbulent region is Re =

600 m/s · (1 − 0.0172) m = 2.839 · 107 . 20.77 · 10−6 m2 /s

436

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

The quantities we are looking for in the turbulent region are, according to section 3.7.4, No. 1, N um, turb

= =

0.037 Re0.8 P r 1 + 2.443 Re−0.1 (P r 2/3 − 1) % &0.8 · 0.702 0.037 · 2.839 · 107 = 2.62 · 104 1 + 2.443 · (2.839 · 107 )−0.1 · (0.7022/3 − 1) 0.0299 W/Km = 797 W/m2 K . (1 − 0.0172) m

αm, turb

=

N um, turb λ/L = 2.62 · 104 ·

Q˙ turb

=

αm, turb A (T0 − Te )

=

797 W/m2 K · (1 − 0.0172) m · 1 m · (333.15 − 452) K = −93.1 kW .

The total heat fed to the plate is Q˙ = Q˙ lam + Q˙ turb = −94.5 kW. In order to keep the plate temperature constant this heat ﬂow has to be removed.

3.12 Exercises

3.12

437

Exercises

3.1: Plaster and sugar crystals conduct heat diﬀerently along the direction of the coordinate axes. Their thermal conductivity is given by the following tensor ⎛ ⎞ λ11 λ12 0 0 ⎠ . λii = ⎝ λ21 λ22 0 0 λ33 How large are the heat ﬂuxes in the direction of the individual coordinate axes, and what is the diﬀerential equation for steady-state conduction through a thin, ﬂat plate parallel to the x2 -direction? 3.2: The mean heat transfer coeﬃcient on a small sphere of diameter d0 with chloroform ﬂowing over it is to be determined. This involves a number of experiments with water on a sphere with a diameter ten times larger. a) At what temperature do the experiments have to be run, if the mean temperature of the chloroform is T0 = 293 K? b) The main interest is in heat transfer coeﬃcients in the chloroform for ﬂow velocities in the region 0.2 m/s ≤ wα ≤ 2 m/s. Over what range of velocities do the experiments with water have to be carried out? c) In the model experiments a mean heat transfer coeﬃcient of αM = 250 W/m2 K is found for a certain state. How big is the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient on the sphere with the chloroform ﬂowing over it for the same Reynolds and Prandtl numbers? The following material data for chloroform at T0 = 293 K are known: ν = 0.383·10−6 m2 /s, λ = 0.121 W/Km, P r = 4.5. The properties for water can be read oﬀ the graph, Fig. 3.60 or be interpolated from Table B.2.

Fig. 3.60: Material properties of water

438

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

3.3: The heat loss from a valve due to laminar free ﬂow to the surrounding air is to be determined from experiments using a reduced scale 1 : 2 model. On the model, with a temperature diﬀerence ΔϑM = 20 K between the model surface and the surrounding air, a heat loss of Q˙ M = 200 W is discovered. How large is the heat loss Q˙ O of the original if the temperature diﬀerence between the surface and the surrounding air is ΔϑO = 15 K? The relevant thermophysical properties of the air can be assumed to be constant. 3.4: From measurements of the heat transfer in ﬂow over a body it is known that the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient αm is dependent on the following quantities αm = f (L, wm, , λ, ν, c) . Using similarity theory show that the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient can be represented as a function of three variables N u = f (Re, P r) with N u = αm L/λ, Re = wm L/ν and P r = ν/a. 3.5: The investigation of gas bubbles rising in vertical, cylindrical tubes ﬁlled with liquid is of technical interest, for example for the design of air-lift pumps and circulation evaporators among others. However the calculation of this process is diﬃcult, even when it is highly idealised. With the help of dimensional analysis, a number of far-reaching statements can be made about the form of the solution in this case. The problem will be idealised as follows: – It will be based on a very large air bubble in water, which virtually ﬁlls the entire cross section of the tube, see Fig. 3.61.

Fig. 3.61: Air bubble in water

– Air and water will be taken as frictionless and incompressible. – Capillary forces will be neglected. – The bubble moves at a steady velocity w up the tube. Under these preconditions the physical process can be described by the following inﬂuencing quantities: w, g, d, W , A . g is the acceleration due to gravity, d the tube diameter, A the density of air, W the density of water. a) Determine the dimensionless groups which describe the process π1 , π2 , . . . , πn . b) What statements can be made from the relationship π1 = f (π2 , π3 , . . . , πn ) between the dimensionless groups, about the form of the equation w = f (g, d, W , A )?

3.12 Exercises

439

3.6: The velocity proﬁle in the boundary layer can be approximately described by the statement π y wx = sin , wδ 2δ which likewise satisﬁes the boundary conditions wx (y = 0) = 0;

wx (y = δ) = wδ ;

(∂wx /∂y)y=0 = 0

and

(∂ 2 wx /∂y 2 )y=0 = 0 .

Calculate the thickness of the boundary layer δ(x). 3.7: Hot air at 300 ◦ C and a pressure of 0.01 MPa ﬂows at a velocity of 10 m/s over a 1 m long, ﬂat plate. What heat ﬂow must be removed per m2 of the plate surface area if we want to maintain the plate temperature at 25 ◦ C? Given are kinematic viscosity ν1 (p1 = 0.1 MPa, ϑm = 162.5 ◦ C) = 30.84 · 10−6 m2 /s, the Prandtl number P r(ϑm = 162.5 ◦ C) = 0.687 and the thermal conductivity of air λ(ϑ = 162.5 ◦ C) = 3.64 · 10−2 W/Km. 3.8: Humid air at 20 ◦ C and a relative humidity ϕ = 0.5 ﬂows over a lake which is also at 20 ◦ C. The lake is 200 m · 50 m big and the air ﬂows over the longitudinal area with a velocity of 2 m/s. How much water evaporates per hour? Given are the viscosity of air ν(20 ◦ C) = 1.535 · 10−5 m2 /s, the Schmidt number for water vapour-air Sc = ν/D = 0.6, the saturation pressure of water pWS (20 ◦ C) = 2.337 · 10−3 MPa and the saturation density (20 ◦ C) = 0.01729 kg/m3 . 3.9: A thin walled, steel pipe of 6 cm length and 50 mm internal diameter is heated by condensing steam from the outside, which maintains the internal wall temperature at 100 ◦ C. The tube has V˙ = 2.5 · 10−4 m3 /s of water ﬂowing through it, that is heated from 20 ◦ C to 60 ◦ C. How large is the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient over the pipe length? Properties of water at 20 ◦ C: density = 998.3 kg/m3 , speciﬁc heat capacity cp = 4.184 kJ/kgK. 3.10: A solar collector, see Fig. 3.62, consists of a parabolic reﬂector and an absorber pipe whose axis is located at the focusing point of the reﬂector. The reﬂector concentrates the solar radiation received onto the absorber pipe which has water running through it at a velocity of 0.03 m/s which is heated up. How long do the reﬂector and pipe have to be if the water is to be heated from ϑi = 20 ◦ C to ϑe = 80 ◦ C and the solar radiation amounts to q˙S = 800 W/m2 ? How high is the internal temperature of the pipe wall at the outlet?

Fig. 3.62: Solar collector with reﬂector and absorber

The reﬂector has side length s = 2 m, the internal diameter of the tube is di = 60 mm, the outer diameter do = 65 mm. Further, the following properties for water are given: density at 20 ◦ C: = 998.3 kg/m3 , speciﬁc heat capacity cp = 4.184 kJ/kgK. The local heat transfer coeﬃcient at the outlet will be α = 264 W/m2 K.

440

3 Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂow

3.11: 0.2 kg/s of superheated steam at a pressure 0.1 MPa ﬂow through a non-insulated steel pipe of inner diameter 25 mm and 5 m length. The steam enters the pipe at a temperature of ϑi = 150 ◦ C and is cooled to ϑe = 120 ◦ C by the time it reaches the outlet. The pipe is surrounded by cold air at a temperature of ϑ0 = 0 ◦ C; the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient from the pipe surface to the air is αe = 15 W/m2 K. Calculate the heat lost to the surroundings and the surface temperature of the pipe at the outlet. The thermal resistances are negligible. The following properties for steam are given: Prandtl number P r(135 ◦ C) = 0.983, speciﬁc heat capacity cp (135 ◦ C) = 1.997 kJ/kgK, thermal conductivity λ(135 ◦ C) = 0.0276 W/Km, dynamic viscosity η(135 ◦ C) = 13.60 · 10−6 kg/sm. 3.12: Air at ϑA = 40 ◦ C and relative humidity ϕ = 0.2 ﬂows over an irregular packing of spheres whose surface temperature is kept constant at the wet bulb temperature 21.5 ◦ C by evaporating water. The air becomes loaded with water vapour. Calculate a) the heat transferred and b) the amount of water transferred. The following values are given: sphere diameter d = 0.02 m, channel cross section without the spheres A0 = 1 m2 , air velocity over A0 : wm = 2 m/s, void fraction ε = 0.4, packing height H = 0.65 m, saturation pressure of water vapour pWS (40 ◦ C) = 73.85 mbar, thermal conductivity of air at (ϑA + ϑ0 )/2 = 30.75 ◦ C : λ = 0.0267 W/Km, Prandtl number P r = 0.71, kinematic viscosity ν = 1.63 · 10−5 m2 /s, Enthalpy of evaporation of water at 21.5 ◦ C: Δhv = 2450.0 kJ/kg. 3.13: In a ﬂuidised bed, hot sand at 850 ◦ C serves as the heating medium for atmospheric air at a pressure of 0.1 MPa, from its initial temperature 20 ◦ C to practically 850 ◦ C. The hot air is then fed to a furnace. Calculate the blower power and the heat fed to the air. Given: inner diameter of the ﬂuidising chamber 3 m, kinematic viscosity of air ν(850 ◦ C) = 1.506 · 10−4 m2 /s, gas constant for air 0.2872 kJ/kgK, mean speciﬁc heat capacity between 30 ◦ C and 850 ◦ C: cp = 1.169 kJ/kgK, speciﬁc heat capacity cp (20 ◦ C) = 1.006 kJ/kgK, density of sand S = 2500 kg/m3 , particle diameter dP = 0.5 mm, sphericity ϕS = 0.86, height H0 of the quiescent sand layer H0 = 0.5 m, void fraction of the quiescent sand layer εS = 0.36, void fraction at the minimum ﬂuidising point εnf = 0.44, void fraction at 10 times the minimum ﬂuidisation velocity ε = 0.55, blower eﬃciency ηv = 0.7. 3.14: The temperature of a layer of air close to the ground is constant at 15 ◦ C up to a height of 100 m. Exhaust gas from a chimney containing mainly CO2 has an initial temperature of 170 ◦ C. Check if this exhaust gas can rise to a height greater than 100 m. Given are: gas constant for air RA = 0.2872 kJ/kgK, gas constant the exhaust gas RG = 0.1889 kJ/kgK, adiabatic exponent of the exhaust gas κ = 1.3, air pressure at the ground p1 = 0.1 MPa. 3.15: A 60 ◦ C hot, vertically standing, square plate of dimensions L = b = 1 m has air at a pressure of 0.1 MPa and a temperature of 20 ◦ C ﬂowing over it from top to bottom at a velocity of 1 m/s. How much heat does the plate release? The following properties of air at the mean boundary layer temperature of 40 ◦ C are given: thermal conductivity λ = 0.0274 W/Km, kinematic viscosity ν = 17.23·10−6 m2 /s, Prandtl number P r = 0.706. Further, the thermal expansion coeﬃcient at 20 ◦ C is β∞ = 1/T∞ = 3.2 · 10−3 K−1 .

3.12 Exercises

441

3.16: A 0.4 m high, vertical plate being heated electrically with q˙ = 15 W/m2 has atmospheric air at a pressure of 0.1 MPa and a temperature of 10 ◦ C ﬂowing over it. Calculate the plate temperature over its height. As the mean boundary layer temperature is unknown, calculate approximately with the material properties of air at 10 ◦ C. These are: thermal conductivity λ = 0.0251 W/Km, kinematic viscosity ν = 14.40 · 10−6 m2 /s, Prandtl number P r = 0.710, thermal expansion coeﬃcient β∞ = 1/T∞ = 3.543 · 10−3 K−1 . 3.17: Beer in cylindrical cans of 150 mm height and 60 mm diameter has a temperature of 27 ◦ C and shall be cooled in a refrigerator which has an air temperature of 4 ◦ C. When does the beer cool more quickly: if the cans are laid down in the refrigerator, or if they are standing? Calculate approximately with the properties of air at the initial mean temperature (27 + 4) ◦ C/2 = 15.5 ◦ C. For this the thermal conductivity is λ = 0.0255 W/Km, the kinematic viscosity is ν = 14.90 · 10−6 m2 /s, the Prandtl number is P r = 0.709, further, the thermal expansion coeﬃcient is β∞ = 1/T∞ = 3.475 · 10−3 K−1 . 3.18: Calculate the temperature of the external skin of an aeroplane surface. The aeroplane is ﬂying at a height of 10 000 m with a velocity of 700 km/h. The air temperature at 10 000 m height is −50 ◦ C. What heat ﬂow per m2 aeroplane surface area is fed from the air conditioning to maintain the internal temperature Ti at 20 ◦ C? Given are the following properties for air: adiabatic exponent κ = 1.4, gas constant R = 0.2872 kJ/kgK. Furthermore, the thermal resistance of the aeroplane skin is λ/δ = 5 m2 K/W and the heat transfer coeﬃcient inside is αi = 10 W/m2 K. 3.19: Air ﬂows over a wing at supersonic velocity. The Mach number Ma δ is 2, the temperature of the external skin of the wing should not rise above 300 ◦ C. From what air temperature onwards does the wing have to be cooled?

•

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

Some of the convective heat and mass transfer processes with phase change that we will deal with in the following have already been explained in the previous chapters. This includes the evaporation of a liquid at the interface between a gas and a liquid or the sublimation at a gas-solid interface. They can be described using the methods for convective heat and mass transfer. However in many heat and mass transfer processes in ﬂuids, condensing or boiling at a solid surface play a decisive role. In thermal power plants water at high pressure is vaporized in the boiler and the steam produced is expanded in a turbine, and then liquiﬁed again in a condenser. In compression or absorption plants and heat pumps, boilers and condensers are important pieces of equipment in the plant. In the separation of mixtures, the diﬀerent composition of vapours in equilibrium with their liquids is used. Boiling and condensing are, therefore, characteristic for many separation processes in chemical engineering. As examples of these types of processes, the evaporation, condensation, distillation, rectiﬁcation and absorption of a ﬂuid should all be mentioned. In order to vaporize a liquid or condense a vapour, the enthalpy of vaporization has to either be added to or removed from it. Under the precondition of thermodynamic equilibrium, the phase change demands that there is no diﬀerence in the temperatures of the two phases. However, in reality an imbalance is necessary for the phase change to occur, even if it is only a small temperature diﬀerence. Heat transfer coeﬃcients in condensation and boiling are, in general, much larger than those for convective heat transfer without a phase change. In addition the diﬀerence in density of the vapour and the liquid is large, as long as the phase change takes place far away from the critical region. This causes strong buoyancy forces (L − G ) g to appear, so that heat and mass transfer is supported by free ﬂow. In the following sections we will study these processes.

4.1

Heat transfer in condensation

When vapour comes into contact with a wall, which is at a lower temperature than the saturation temperature of the vapour, the vapour will be liquiﬁed at the

444

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

surface of the wall. A condensate is formed, which is subcooled as a result of its contact with the surface of the wall. This then induces further vapour to condense on the previously formed condensate. So, condensation of vapours is always linked to a mass transport, in which the vapour ﬂows to the phase interface and is then transformed into the liquid phase. The course of this process can be subdivided into several steps, in which a series of resistances have to be overcome. The fraction of these individual resistances in the total resistance can be very diﬀerent. First, as a result of ﬂow (convective transport) and molecular motion (diﬀusion transport), the vapour reaches the phase interface. In the next step the vapour condenses at the phase interface, and ﬁnally the enthalpy of condensation released at the interface is transported to the cooled wall by conduction and convection. Accordingly, three resistances in series have to be overcome: the thermal resistance in the vapour phase, the thermal resistance during the conversion of the vapour into the liquid phase, and ﬁnally the resistance to heat transport in the liquid phase. Of these resistances, the thermal resistance in the liquid phase is generally decisive. The thermal resistance in the vapour is often low due to good mixing, but in the event of the vapour being superheated, this resistance has to be considered. This is also the case in the condensation of vapour mixtures or of mixtures containing inert gases because of the inhibitive eﬀect of the diﬀusion. The conversion of vapour to liquid phase requires a temperature drop at the phase interface between vapour and liquid. However this is very small, normally only a few hundredths of a Kelvin, discounting very low pressures, which for water lie below 0.01 bar [4.1]. Correspondingly, the associated “molecular kinetic” resistance at the phase interface of vapour to liquid is almost always negligible.

4.1.1

The diﬀerent types of condensation

Actual condensation can take place in many diﬀerent ways. If the condensate forms a continuous ﬁlm, Fig. 4.1, we speak of film condensation. The condensate ﬁlm can be quiescent, or be in laminar or turbulent ﬂow. The thermal resistance is decisive for the condensation rate, if the molecular kinetic resistance can be neglected. In calculations it is suﬃcient to just investigate this resistance, as Nusselt [4.2] ﬁrst did for a ﬂowing laminar ﬁlm. Instead of a ﬁlm the condensate can also exist in the form of droplets, as shown in Fig. 4.2. This type of condensation is called drop condensation. Whether ﬁlm or drop condensation prevails depends on whether the wall is completely or incompletely wetted. The decisive factor for this are the forces acting on a liquid droplet, which are illustrated in Fig. 4.3. σLG is the interfacial tension (SI units N/m) of the liquid (index L) against its own vapour (index G), σSL is the tension of the solid wall (index S) against the liquid and σSG is the interfacial tension of the wall with the vapour, so at equilibrium the contact angle β0 is formed according

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

Fig. 4.1: Film condensation

445

Fig. 4.2: Drop condensation

to the equation σSG − σSL = σLG cos β0 .

(4.1)

Finite values of this contact angle imply incomplete wetting and droplet formation. If, on the other hand, β0 = 0, the droplets spread out over the entire wall. If the so-called wetting tension is σSG − σSL > σLG , an equilibrium according to that in (4.1), can no longer occur. Complete wetting takes place and a ﬁlm develops. Fig. 4.3: Interfacial tension at the droplet edge in incomplete wetting. The indices S, L, G represent the solid, liquid and gaseous phases, β0 is the contact angle.

In practice, mixtures of vapours whose liquid phases are immiscible often have to be condensed. This results in the formation of a mix of drop and ﬁlm condensation, Fig. 4.4. In an extended liquid ﬁlm of one phase, large drops of the other phase develop, some of which reach the wall whilst others are enclosed by the liquid ﬁlm or ﬂoat on top of it.

Fig. 4.4: Condensation of vapours of immiscible liquids

Fig. 4.5: Condensate formation as a droplet mist

446

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

Finally, by suﬃcient subcooling of a vapour and the presence of “condensation nuclei”, that is tiny particles on which condensate can be deposited, a mist forms, as Fig. 4.5 shows schematically.

4.1.2

Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory

When a vapour condenses on a vertical or inclined surface a liquid ﬁlm develops, which ﬂows downwards under the inﬂuence of gravity. When the vapour velocity is low and the liquid ﬁlm is very thin, a laminar ﬂow is created in the condensate. The heat will mainly be transferred by conduction from the surface of the condensate to the wall. The heat transferred by convection in the liquid ﬁlm is negligibly small. In 1916, Nusselt [4.2] had already put forward a simple theory for the calculation of heat transfer in laminar ﬁlm condensation in tubes and on vertical or inclined walls. This theory is known in technical literature as Nusselt’s film condensation theory. It shall be explained in the following, using the example of condensation on a vertical wall. As Fig. 4.6 shows, saturated steam at a temperature ϑs is condensing on a vertical wall whose temperature ϑ0 is constant and lower than the saturation temperature. A continuous condensate ﬁlm develops which ﬂows downwards under the inﬂuence of gravity, and has a thickness δ(x) that constantly increases. The velocity proﬁle w(y), with w for wx , is obtained from a force balance. Under the assumption of steady ﬂow, the force exerted by the shear stress are in equilibrium with the force of gravity, corresponding to the sketch on the right hand side of Fig. 4.6 L g dV + τ (y + dy) dx dy + p(x) dy dz = τ (y) dx dz + p(x + dx) dy dz . (4.2) With τ (y + dy) − τ (y) = (∂τ /∂y) dy , p(x) dy dz − p(x + dx) dy dz = −(dp/dx) dx dy dz and dV = dx dy dz we obtain

∂τ dp = −L g + . ∂y dx Considering only the vapour space, it is valid there that dp = G g . dx With that, the force balance is ∂τ = −(L − G )g . ∂y

(4.3)

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

447

Fig. 4.6: Laminar condensate ﬁlm on a vertical wall. Velocity and temperature proﬁles. Force balance

If the condensate is a Newtonian ﬂuid, it holds that τ = ηL

∂w . ∂y

(4.4)

Under the assumption of temperature independent dynamic viscosity, (4.3) is transformed into ∂ 2w ηL = −(L − G )g , (4.5) ∂y2 from which, after integration, assuming constant density, the velocity proﬁle parabolic in coordinate y w=−

(L − G )g 2 y + c1 y + c0 2 ηL

(4.6)

is obtained. The coeﬃcients c1 and c0 can still depend on the coordinate x. Two boundary conditions are available for their determination: At the wall, y = 0, the velocity is w = 0, and if we further assume that the vapour velocity is not very large, and as a result of this that the shear stress exerted by the vapour on the condensate ﬁlm is low, then at the surface of the condensate y = δ ∂w/∂y = 0 . With these two boundary conditions we have c0 = 0 and c1 = (L − G )g δ/ηL , so that we obtain the following for the velocity proﬁle y2 (L − G )g 2 y δ − w= . ηL δ 2δ 2

(4.7)

The mean velocity, wm(x), over the thickness of the ﬁlm, δ(x), is found by integration to be δ 1 (L − G ) g 2 wm = w dy = δ . (4.8) δ 3ηL 0

448

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

The mass ﬂow rate of the condensate ﬁlm follows as L(L − G )g b 3 δ , M˙ = wm Lb δ = 3ηL

(4.9)

and the change in the mass ﬂow rate with the ﬁlm thickness is dM˙ L(L − G )g b 2 δ . = dδ ηL

(4.10)

The formation of the condensate ﬂow dM˙ , requires a heat ﬂow dQ˙ = Δhv dM˙ to be removed, where Δhv is the enthalpy of vaporization. This heat will, by presumption, be transferred purely by heat conduction through the condensate ﬁlm. The heat transferred through the condensate ﬁlm by convection can be neglected. If, in addition to this, we presume constant thermal conductivity of the condensate and with that a linear temperature proﬁle, like that in Fig. 4.6, then along surface segment b dx the heat ﬂow will be ϑs − ϑ0 dQ˙ = λL b dx . δ On the other hand, because of dQ˙ = Δhv dM˙ , with the condensate mass ﬂow rate dM˙ given by (4.10), the last equation is transformed into λL

ϑs − ϑ0 L (L − G )g b 2 b dx = Δhv dM˙ = Δhv δ dδ , δ ηL

or δ3

dδ λL ηL (ϑs − ϑ0 ) , = dx L (L − G )gΔhv

from which, taking δ(x = 0) = 0 into account, the ﬁlm thickness

1/4 4λL ηL (ϑs − ϑ0 ) δ= x L (L − G )gΔhv

(4.11)

is found by integration. The ﬁlm thickness grows with the fourth root of the length x. As the temperature proﬁle has been assumed to be linear, the local heat transfer coeﬃcient α is given by 1/4 λL L(L − G )gΔhv λ3L 1 , α= = δ 4ηL (ϑs − ϑ0 ) x

(4.12)

and the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient for a wall of height H is 1 αm = H

H α dx = 0

1/4 4 L (L − G )gΔhv λ3L 1 . (4.13) α(x = H) = 0.943 3 ηL (ϑs − ϑ0) H

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

449

All material properties are based on those for the condensate, and are best evaluated at the mean temperature ϑm = (ϑ0 + ϑs )/2. Using the energy balance for the condensate mass ﬂow along the height H, M˙ Δhv = αm(ϑs − ϑ0 )bH , allows the temperature diﬀerence ϑs − ϑ0 to be eliminated. A relationship equivalent to that in equation (4.13) is obtained αm λL

ηL2 L (L − G )g

1/3 = 0.925

M˙ /b ηL

−1/3 .

(4.13a)

As we can see from the equations given above, large heat transfer coeﬃcients are achieved when the temperature diﬀerence ϑs − ϑ0 and the height of the wall are small. In both cases the condensate ﬁlm is thin and so the resistances to heat transfer are low. The results from above are also valid for condensation of vapours on the internal and external walls of vertical tubes, if the tube diameter is large in comparison to the ﬁlm thickness. The width b = πd has to be inserted into (4.13a). The previous derivations apply to a vertical wall or tube with a large enough diameter. If the wall is inclined at an angle γ to the vertical, the acceleration due to gravity g, in the earlier equations, has to be replaced by its component g cos γ parallel to the wall. The heat transfer coeﬃcient αγ is then related to that for the vertical wall from (4.12), by the following αγ = α(cos γ)1/4

and correspondingly αmγ = αm (cos γ)1/4 .

(4.14)

These results cannot be applied to inclined tubes because the liquid ﬂow is not evenly distributed over the circumference of the tube. Nusselt also calculated the heat transfer in laminar ﬁlm condensation for horizontal tubes. A diﬀerential equation is then obtained for the ﬁlm thickness. This can be solved numerically. If the outer diameter of the tube is indicated by d, the result found for the heat transfer coeﬃcient averaged over the circumference αm,hor of a horizontal tube can be represented by

αm,hor

L (L − G )gΔhv λ3L 1 = 0.728 ηL (ϑs − ϑ0 ) d

1/4 = 0.864 αm (H = πd/2) ,

(4.15)

where αm is the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient on a vertical wall according to (4.13).1 With the help of the energy balance for the condensate formed M˙ Δhv = αm,hor (ϑs − ϑ0) π d L 1 Nusselt found, by graphical integration in eq. (4.15) instead of the value 0.728, the slightly less accurate value of 0.725, which was used by all later authors.

450

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

the temperature diﬀerence can be eliminated from the previous equation, and can be replaced by the condensate mass ﬂow rate. This produces a relationship equivalent ot the one in (4.15) αm,hor λL

ηL2 L (L − G )g

1/3 = 0.959

M˙ /L ηL

−1/3 .

(4.15a)

A comparison of (4.15) and (4.13) shows that the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient on a tube in a horizontal position is related to that for a vertical tube by αm,hor /αm = 0.772 (L/d)1/4 .

(4.16)

So, if a tube of length 3 m and diameter 0.029 m was chosen, then αm,hor = 2.46 αm . Around 2.5 times more vapour condenses on a tube lying horizontally compared to on the same tube positioned vertically. If n tubes lie one underneath the other in a horizontal tube bank, the condensate ﬁlm in the lower tubes thickens because of the condensate coming from above, thereby reducing the heat transfer coeﬃcient. On the other hand, the condensate falling from above improves the convection in the liquid ﬁlm thereby improving the heat transfer. As the mean value for the heat transfer coeﬃcients αmn for n tubes lying on top of each other, we obtain, according to Nusselt, αmn /αm1 = n−1/4 , where αm1 is the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient for the uppermost tube according to (4.15). However, the improved heat transfer caused by the stronger convection due to the falling condensate is not considered in this hypothesis. The heat transfer coeﬃcient αmn calculated in this way is a little too small. More exact values can be obtained, according to Chen [4.3], if we additionally take into account that the liquid ﬁlm mixes with the condensate falling from above and is subcooled because of this, so that new vapour can condense. The result of this is cpL (ϑs − ϑ0 ) αmn = 1 + 0.2 (n − 1) n−1/4 αm1 , (4.17) Δhv where αm1 is once again the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient for the uppermost tube from (4.15). This relationship reproduces very well measured values on tubes arranged vertically in line, in the region cpL (ϑs − ϑ0)(n − 1)/Δhv < 2.

4.1.3

Deviations from Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory

Experiments on ﬁlm condensation of saturated vapour on vertical walls yield deviations by as much as +25% from the heat transfer coeﬃcients according to Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory. There are diﬀerent reasons that are decisive for this.

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

451

a) Wave formation on the ﬁlm surface Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory presumes an even increase in the thickness of the ﬁlm due to further condensation. However experiments, among others [4.4] to [4.6], have shown that even in a ﬂow that is clearly laminar, waves can develop at the ﬁlm surface. These types of waves were not only observed on rough but also on polished surfaces. Obviously this means that the disturbances in the velocity that are always present in a stream are not damped under certain conditions, and so waves form. They lead to an improvement in the heat transfer of 10 to 25 % compared to the predictions from Nusselt’s theory. According to Grimley [4.7], waves and ripples appear above a critical Reynolds number Re =

1/2 1/3 3/4 wm δ σ M˙ /b g = = 0.392 , νL ηL L g νL2

(4.18)

where σ is the surface tension and νL = ηL /L is the kinematic viscosity of the liquid. Based on a calculation of the disturbances van der Walt and Kr¨ oger [4.8] have proved that this relationship represents a good approximation of the point at which waves appear in water and some other ﬂuids, such as the refrigerant R12. However in liquid sodium waves ﬁrst develop at critical Reynolds numbers that are around ﬁve times larger than those calculated according to (4.18). If the formation of waves is ignored and the calculations are done according to Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory, then the heat transfer coeﬃcients obtained are too small, meaning that the condenser would be too big. Unfortunately at the moment there is no reliable theory for calculating the inﬂuence of wave formation on the heat transfer. In practical applications, the heat transfer coeﬃcient α according to Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory is multiplied by a correction factor f , αwaves = f α , (4.19) which accounts for the inﬂuence of wave formation. As the waves lead to a smaller ﬁlm thickness, in terms of the statistical mean, the heat transfer is improved by wave formation. The correction factor above is therefore larger than one, and according to experiments by van der Walt and Kr¨ oger [4.8] is independent to a large degree of the amount of condensate. A good mean value is f = 1.15.

b) Temperature dependent properties In (4.12) and (4.13) of Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory the material properties of the condensate are presumed to be independent of temperature. This assumption is well met if the temperature drop ϑs − ϑ0 in the condensate ﬁlm is suﬃciently small. In any other case the change in the dynamic viscosity, the thermal conductivity, and on a lower scale the density of the condensate ﬁlm with the temperature has to be considered. In place of (4.5) the momentum balance appears ∂w ∂ (4.20) ηL (ϑ) = − [L (ϑ) − G ] g , ∂y ∂y and in the condensate ﬁlm, under the assumption that heat is only transferred by conduction in the condensate ﬁlm, the temperature proﬁle is yielded from the energy balance ∂ ∂ϑ λL (ϑ) =0 . (4.21) ∂y ∂y These equations are to be solved under the boundary conditions ∂w(y = δ) =0 , ∂y

w(y = 0) = 0 , ϑ(y = 0) = ϑ0

and

ϑ(y = δ) = ϑs .

452

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

The heat transfer coeﬃcient follows, by deﬁnition, from ∂ϑ dQ˙ = αb dx (ϑs − ϑ0 ) = −λ0 b dx = Δhv dM˙ . ∂y y=0

(4.22)

The detailed solution of (4.20) and (4.21) under the given boundary conditions shall not be presented here. Information can be found for this in a paper by Voskresenskij [4.9]. With the additional assumption that the density of the liquid ﬁlm only slightly depends on the temperature, and that it is much larger than that of the vapour, L G , we obtain the result that the relationship between the heat transfer coeﬃcient α, and the heat transfer coeﬃcient αN u , according to Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory, can be represented by λs ηs α . (4.23) =f ; αN u λ0 η0 The index s signiﬁes the material properties of the condensate ﬁlm at the saturation temperature, whilst index 0, indicates those properties that are formed at the wall temperature. The heat transfer coeﬃcient αN u according to Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory, (4.12), is calculated with the mean material properties ηL = With the abbreviations

1 (ηs + η0 ) and 2 η ∗ = ηs /η0

and

λL =

1 (λs + λ0 ) . 2

λ∗ = λs /λ0

(4.23) in its complete form is 1/4 α λ∗ 1 + η∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗2 5 + λ = (14 + 11λ ) + (1 + 4λ + 5λ ) . αN u 10 (1 + λ∗ )3 η∗

(4.24)

In the limiting case λ∗ = η ∗ = 1 we obtain α = αN u . Fig. 4.7 illustrates (4.24). As we can see from the graph, the temperature dependence of the dynamic viscosity and the thermal conductivity can have a marked inﬂuence on the heat transfer, as far as they change starkly with the temperature. In condensing steam, for a temperature diﬀerence between the saturation and wall temperatures of ϑs − ϑ0 ≤ 50 K, the material properties vary for λs /λ0 between 0.6 and 1.2 and for ηs /η0 between 1 and 1.3. This region is hatched in Fig. 4.7. It is clear that within this region the deviations from Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory are less than 3%.

c) Subcooling the condensate and superheating the vapour As the wall temperature is lower than the saturation temperature, not only the condensation enthalpy will be released at the wall, another heat ﬂow from the subcooling of the condensate exists. In a cross section at point x the enthalpy ﬂow of the falling condensate is M˙ (h − hL ) = M˙ Δhv +

δ L w b cpL (ϑs − ϑ) dy ,

(4.25)

0

where hL is the mean speciﬁc enthalpy of the liquid. If the liquid over a cross section was at the saturation temperature ϑ − ϑs , then we would have h − hL = h − h . Presuming again a linear temperature proﬁle

y ϑs − ϑ = (ϑs − ϑ0 ) 1 − , (4.26) δ and assuming the properties of the condensate are independent of temperature, after inserting the temperature from (4.26) and the velocity from (4.7) into (4.25), we obtain as a result of the integration 3 (h − hL ) = Δhv + cpL (ϑs − ϑ0 ) = Δh∗v . (4.27) 8

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

453

Fig. 4.7: Inﬂuence of temperature dependent material properties on heat transfer in ﬁlm condensation [4.9]

It follows from this that, under the assumptions made, the speciﬁc enthalpy hL of the ﬂowing condensate is independent of the ﬁlm thickness. The equation further shows that the enthalpy of vaporization Δhv in the equations for Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory has to be replaced by the enthalpy diﬀerence Δh∗v . If we additionally consider that the temperature proﬁle in the condensate ﬁlm is slightly curved, then according to Rohsenow [4.10] in place of (4.27), we obtain for Δh∗v the more exact value Δh∗v = Δhv + 0.68 cpL (ϑs − ϑ0 ) .

(4.28)

This relationship holds for Prandtl numbers P r > 0.5 and cpL (ϑs − ϑ0 )/Δhv ≤ 1. The best agreement with experiments is yielded when the material properties, in particular the dynamic viscosity ηL , are evaluated at a temperature ϑL = ϑ0 + 1/4(ϑs − ϑ0 ). A further, and likewise small, deviation from Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory is found for superheated vapour. In addition to the enthalpy of vaporization, the superheat enthalpy cpG (ϑG − ϑs ) has to be removed in order to cool the superheated vapour from a temperature ϑG to the saturation temperature ϑs at the phase interface. Instead of the enthalpy diﬀerence Δhv according to (4.28), the enthalpy diﬀerence Δh∗vs = cpG (ϑG − ϑs ) + Δhv + 0.68 cpL (ϑs − ϑ0 )

(4.29)

454

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

is used in (4.13). Furthermore, as the temperature diﬀerence in the condensate ﬁlm is ϑs −ϑ0 , the ∗ heat ﬂux is found from q˙ = α(ϑs − ϑ0 ) and the mass ﬂux of the condensate from M˙ /A = q/Δh ˙ vs . However in practice the subcooling of the condensate, the buoyancy forces and the superheating of the vapour seldom reach such values that the improved equations (4.28) or (4.29) have to be used.

4.1.4

Inﬂuence of non-condensable gases

If a vapour condenses in the presence of a non-condensable gas it has to diﬀuse through this gas to the phase interface. This means that a drop in the partial pressure to the phase interface is required. As can be seen in Fig. 4.8, the partial pressure p1 of the vapour drops from a constant value p1G away from the phase interface to a lower value p1I at the phase interface. Correspondingly, the associated saturation temperature ϑs (p1 ) also falls to the value ϑI at the phase interface. The pressure p0 of the inert gas rises towards the phase interface, so the sum p1 + p0 always yields a constant total pressure p. The saturation temperature ϑI at the phase interface can, depending on the gas content, lie considerably below the saturation temperature ϑs (p) associated with the pressure p, which would occur if no inert gas was present. The temperature diﬀerence between the phase interface and the wall is lowered because of the inert gas and with that the heat transfer is also reduced. In order to avoid or prevent this, it should be possible to remove the inert gas through valves. Large condensers are ﬁtted with steam-jet apparatus which suck the inert gas away. In other cases, for example the condensation of water out of a mixture of steam and air or in the condensation of ammonia from a mixture with air, it is inevitable that inert gases are always present. Therefore their inﬂuence on heat transfer has to be taken into account. The inﬂuence of the inert gases on heat transfer can be determined with the

Fig. 4.8: Inﬂuence of the inert gas on the partial pressure and temperature proﬁles. ϑG vapour temperature, ϑs saturation temperature, p1 partial pressure of the condensing vapour, p0 partial pressure of the inert gas, p = p1 + p0 total pressure

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

455

aid of the energy balance • A (ϑG − ϑI ) . Q˙ = αL A (ϑI − ϑ0 ) = M˙ Δhv + αG

(4.30)

• signiﬁes the heat ﬂow transferred from the vapourThe heat transfer coeﬃcient αG gas mixture to the phase interface. The superscript point indicates that the heat is not only transferred by conduction but also by a material ﬂow normal to the • wall. In a ﬂowing gas, the size of αG is determined from the material properties of the gas and the ﬂow velocity. The mass ﬂow rate M˙ of the vapour transported at the condensate surface increases with the diﬀerence in the partial pressure p1G = y1G p in the vapour space and p1I at the phase interface. According to the laws of mass transfer, see (1.195),

p − p1I , M˙ = G βG A ln p − p1G

(4.31)

where G is the density of the gas-vapour mixture at pressure p and temperature ϑG . Strictly speaking this relationship is only valid if the temperature up to the phase interface is constant. Disregarding low temperatures, this assumption of constant temperature rarely causes an error in the quantity M˙ . Further, p1I is the partial pressure of the condensing gas at the phase interface and p1G is that in the core of the gas-vapour ﬂow. The Lewis relationship (1.198), which we have already discussed, allows us to relate the mass transfer coeﬃcient βG approximately to the heat transfer coeﬃcient αG βG = Le−2/3 . G cpG The values βG and αG are, as already explained, mass and heat transfer coeﬃcients for a vapour ﬂow, in which the condensate surface is seen as a quiescent, solid wall. Inserting the following into (4.30) • = αG ζ , αG

(4.32)

where the correction factor ζ, the so-called “Ackermann correction” [4.11] takes into account that, in reality, vapour does not ﬂow along a solid wall, rather part of the ﬂow vanishes at the phase interface. The Ackermann correction is obtained in a similar manner to the Stefan correction (1.194) for mass transfer, in which the ﬁlm theory from section 1.5.1 is applied to the processes of heat transfer in the condensation or sucking being considered here, to ζ=

−φ exp(−φ) − 1

with φ =

˙ cpG |M| . A αG

Using (4.31), we obtain from the energy balance (4.30) αG Δhv −2/3 p − p1I Le ln + ζ (ϑG − ϑI ) ϑI − ϑ0 = αL cpG p − p1G

(4.33)

(4.34)

456

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

as a determination equation for the unknown temperature ϑI at the phase interface. This equation can only be solved iteratively. For small inert gas contents p0 p or p1 → p, the quotient (p − p1I )/(p − p1G ) and with that the ﬁrst sum in the brackets will be large. Equation (4.34) simpliﬁes to ϑI − ϑ0 =

αG Δhv −2/3 p − p1I Le ln . αL cpG p − p1G

(4.35)

To be able to estimate the inﬂuence of the inert gas on the heat transfer we will consider a condensate ﬁlm of thickness δ. In front of this there is vapour with an inert gas. If there was no inert gas present, the surface of the ﬁlm would be at the saturation temperature ϑs (p) and the heat ﬂux released would be q˙ =

λL (ϑs − ϑ0) . δ

The presence of the inert gas means that with the same ﬁlm thickness a smaller heat ﬂux λL (ϑI − ϑ0 ) q˙G = δ will be transferred. The ratio q˙G ϑI − ϑ0 ≤1 = q˙ ϑs − ϑ0

(4.36)

shows by how much the heat ﬂux is reduced by the existence of the inert gas. With (4.35) the approximate relationship below is yielded q˙G αG Δhv Le−2/3 p − p1I = ln . q˙ (ϑs − ϑ0 ) αL cpG p − p1G

(4.37)

As we can see from this, the ﬂow velocity in the vapour phase has to be chosen to be suﬃciently high, in particular with large temperature diﬀerences ϑs − ϑ0 , so that the heat transfer coeﬃcient αG of the vapour will be large and with that the heat ﬂux q˙G will not be too small. The results of an accurate calculation are illustrated in Figs. 4.9 and 4.10. The ratio of the two heat ﬂuxes q˙G /q˙ are plotted over the temperature diﬀerence ϑs − ϑ0 with the inert gas fraction as a parameter. Both diagrams are valid for the condensation of steam out of mixture with air. Fig. 4.9 is valid for condensation in forced ﬂow, when the inﬂuence of gravity can be neglected compared to that of the inertia forces, as is the case of ﬂow over a horizontal plate. Fig. 4.10 shows the reverse case, in which the inertia forces are negligible compared to the gravitational forces. This corresponds to free ﬂow on a vertical plate. It is clearly visible in both pictures that the heat transfer reduces with increasing inert gas fractions, and that in free ﬂow it is more signiﬁcantly reduced due to the inert gas than in forced ﬂow.

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

457

Fig. 4.9: Inﬂuence of inert gas on the heat transfer in condensation of a forced ﬂow of steam and air; q˙G heat ﬂux with, q˙ without inert gas

Fig. 4.10: Inﬂuence of inert gas on the heat transfer in condensation of a free ﬂow of steam and air [4.12]; q˙G heat ﬂux with, q˙ without inert gas

Example 4.1: Saturated steam at a pressure 9.58·10−3 MPa, condenses on a vertical wall. The wall temperature is 5 K below the saturation temperature. Calculate the following quantities at a distance of H = 0.08 m from the upper edge of the wall: The ﬁlm thickness δ(H), the mean velocity wm of the downward ﬂowing condensate, its mass ﬂow rate M˙ /b per m plate width, the local and the mean heat transfer coeﬃcients. At what point H1 is the mass ﬂow rate M˙ /b double that at the point H? Why is the heat transfer coeﬃcient over the length H < x ≤ H1 smaller than α(x ≤ H)? Given are: saturation temperature at 9.58·10−3 MPa: ϑs = 45 ◦ C, enthalpy of vaporization Δhv = 2394 kJ/kg, density of the liquid L = 992 kg/m3 , thermal conductivity λL = 0.632 W/Km, dynamic viscosity ηL = 6.38 · 10−4 kg/sm, density of the vapour G L . According to (4.11) the ﬁlm thickness is δ(H) =

δ(H) =

4 · 0.632 W/K m · 6.38 · 10−4 kg/s m · 5 K · 0.08 m 9922 kg2 /m6 · 9.81 m/s2 · 2394 · 103 J/kg

1/4

7.268 · 10−5 m ≈ 0.073 mm .

The mean velocity, according to (4.8), is wm =

992 kg/m3 · 9.81 m/s2 · (7.268 · 10−5 )2 m2 = 0.0269 m/s . 3 · 6.38 · 10−4 kg/s m

458

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

From (4.9) we have M˙ /b = wm L δ = 0.0269 m/s · 992 kg/m3 · 7.268 · 10−5 m = 1.94 · 10−3 kg/s m . The local heat transfer coeﬃcient at point H is α(H) =

λL 0.632 W/K m = = 8696 W/m2 K . δ 7.268 · 10−5 m

The mean heat transfer coeﬃcient follows from (4.13) as αm (H) =

4 α(H) = 11594 W/m2 K . 3

Furthermore

M˙ (H1 ) M˙ (H) =2 = 3.88 · 10−3 kg/sm . b b According to (4.9) the associated ﬁlm thickness is 1/3 1/3 M˙ (H1 ) · 3ηL 3.88 · 10−3 kg/sm · 3 · 6.38 · 10−4 kg/sm δ(H1 ) = = 2 2 L g b 9922 kg /m6 · 9.81 m/s2 δ(H1 ) =

9.16 · 10−5 m .

It follows from (4.11), with x = H1 , that H1 = δ 4

2L g Δ hv , 4 λL ηL (ϑs − ϑ0 )

which gives H1 = (9.16 · 10−5 )4 m4 ·

9922 kg2 /m6 · 9.81 m/s2 · 2394 · 103 J/kg = 0.202 m . 4 · 0.632 W/K m · 6.38 · 10−4 kg/s m · 5 K

Over the length H < x ≤ H1 the ﬁlm is thicker than over the length x ≤ H, and therefore the heat transfer coeﬃcient is smaller. Example 4.2: In a tube bundle condenser, like that sketched in Fig. 4.11, 103 kg/h saturated vapour of ammonia (NH3 ), at a pressure of 2.043 MPa is to be condensed. Cooling water is available at a temperature of 18 ◦ C, and this can be heated by 10K. Steel tubes of length 2 m, 16 mm outer diameter and 1.5 mm wall thickness are to be used in the construction of the condenser. How many tubes are required? How large is the cooling water ﬂow rate? The following data are given for NH3 at the saturation pressure 2.034 MPa: saturation temperature ϑs = 50 ◦ C, density of the liquid L = 562.86 kg/m3 , enthalpy of vaporization Δhv = 1050.5 kJ/kg, speciﬁc heat capacity of the liquid cpL = 5.0635 kJ/kg K, dynamic viscosity ηL = 103.79 · 10−6 kg/s m, thermal conductivity λL = 416.32 · 10−3 W/K m. The heat transfer coeﬃcient on the water side is αmi = 2000 W/m2 K, the speciﬁc heat capacity of water is cpW = 4.182 kJ/kg K. The thermal conductivity of the steel tubes is λS = 20 W/Km. The required heat ﬂow is 103 kg/h Q˙ = M˙ Δhv = · 1050.5 kJ/kg ≈ 291.8 kW . 3600 s/h The amount of cooling water follows from M˙ W =

Q˙ 291.8 kW = = 6.98 kg/s . cpW ΔϑW 4.182 kJ/kg K · 10 K

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

459

The required area comes from Q˙ = km A Δϑm with Δϑm =

(ϑs − ϑWin ) − (ϑs − ϑWout ) (50 − 18) K − (50 − 28) K = = 26.69 K , ln[(ϑs − ϑWin )/(ϑs − ϑWout )] ln[(50 − 18) K/(50 − 28) K]

and with that km A = On the other hand

Q˙ 291.8 kW = 10.93 · 103 W/K . = Δϑm 26.69 K 1 1 1 = + km A αmi Ai αmo Ao

and therefore with A = Ao 1 1 1 δS = + + km αmi (di /do ) αmo λS (dm /do )

with

dm =

do − di = 14.45 mm . ln(do /di )

Fig. 4.11: Tube bundle condenser

The heat transfer coeﬃcient αm on the condensate side is calculated from (4.15a) and (4.17). It still contains in (4.15a) the mass ﬂow rate of the condensate M˙ /L on a single tube, and can be determined if we knew the number of tubes or their surface area A. Therefore we will estimate the mean outside heat transfer coeﬃcient αmo , and use that to ﬁnd the surface area A and then check the estimate at the end. Our estimate is αmo = 3000 W/m2 K. With that we get 1 1 1 = + + km 2 000 W/m2 K · (13 mm/16 mm) 3 000 W/m2 K −3 1.5 · 10 m2 K = 1.0318 · 10−3 20 W/Km · (14.45 mm/16 mm) W km = 969.2 W/m2 K . Giving an area of A = km A/km =

10.93 · 103 W/K = 11.28 m2 . 969.2 W/m2 K

460

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

The number of tubes is z=

A 11.28 m2 = = 112 . do π L 16 · 10−3 m · π · 2 m

We choose 120 tubes. The mean wall temperature ϑ0 follows from Q˙ = αmo A(ϑs − ϑ0 ) as ϑ0 = ϑs −

Q˙ 298.1 · 103 W = 50 ◦ C − = 41.1 ◦ C . 2 αmo A 3000 W/m K · 11.28 m2

Examination of αmo : According to (4.15a) αm, hor = αm1 = λL

ηL2 2L g

−1/3 0.959

M˙ /L ηL

−1/3

(103.79 · 10−6 )2 kg2 /s2 m2 (562.86 · 103 )2 kg2 /m6 · 9.81 m/s2 −1/3 0.278 kg/s · 0.959 · 11 · 2 m · 103.79 · 10−6 kg/s m

= 416.32 · 10−3 W/Km ·

−1/3

αm, hor = 1597 W/m2 K . √ Around 120 ≈ 11 tubes lie one above each other. From (4.17) we get 506.35 kJ/kg K · (50 − 41.4) K αmn = αmo = 1 + 0.2 · · (11 − 1) · 11−1/4 · 5323 W/m2 K 1050.5 kJ/kg αmo = 2716 W/m2 K . A correction of the estimate for αmo is unnecessary. Note: In the calculation of αmo according to (4.15a) and (4.17) an error is made, because both equations presume a constant wall temperature. In this case the wall temperature is variable. The cooling water temperature and with that the wall temperature increases in the direction of ﬂow of the cooling water. However, because αm, hor according to (4.15a) only changes with ∼ (ϑs − ϑ0 )−1/4 , in this example the error hardly has any eﬀect on the result.

4.1.5

Film condensation in a turbulent ﬁlm

Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory presumes a laminar ﬁlm ﬂow. As the amount of condensate increases downstream, the Reynolds number formed with the ﬁlm thickness increases. The initially ﬂat ﬁlm becomes wavy and is eventually transformed from a laminar to a turbulent ﬁlm; the heat transfer is signiﬁcantly better than in the laminar ﬁlm. The heat transfer in turbulent ﬁlm condensation was ﬁrst calculated approximately by Grigull [4.14], who applied the Prandtl analogy for pipe ﬂow to the turbulent condensate ﬁlm. In addition to the quantities for laminar ﬁlm condensation the Prandtl number appears as a new parameter. The results can not be represented explicitly. In order to obtain a clear representation, we will now deﬁne the Reynolds number of the condensate ﬁlm Re :=

wm δ wm δ L b M˙ = = . νL νL L b ηL b

(4.38)

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

461

In the framework of Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory, using the mass ﬂow rate for the condensate, eq. (4.9), L (L − G ) g b 3 δ M˙ = wm L b δ = 3 ηL and taking L G into account, it can be rearranged into 1/3 M˙ /b 2 g g Re = = L 2 δ 3 or (3 Re)1/3 = δ . ηL 3 ηL νL2 By eliminating the ﬁlm thickness δ using α = λL /δ, the heat transfer equation for Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory can also be written as Nu =

α (νL2 /g)1/3 = (3 Re)−1/3 , λL

(4.39)

where the Reynolds number is given by (4.38). In turbulent condensate ﬁlms, as Grigull showed, we get N u = f (Re, P r) . The results of an analytical solution of the diﬀerential equations for a turbulent condensate ﬁlm on a vertical tube are reproduced in Fig. 4.12, [4.15]. Line A represents Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory according to (4.39).

Fig. 4.12: Local Nusselt number as a function of the Reynolds number, according to [4.15], in condensation on a vertical tube or a vertical ﬂat wall

The Reynolds number Re = wm δ/νL for the condensation on a vertical tube can, due to the mass balance M˙ = wm d π δ L and with ηL = νL L , also be written as Re = M˙ /(d π ηL ). As the tube diameter d, on which the calculations

462

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

from Fig. 4.12 are based, is much larger than the assumed thickness of the ﬁlm, the curvature of the condensate ﬁlm has no eﬀect on the heat transfer. The results also hold for condensation on a vertical ﬂat plate, with the Reynolds number deﬁned in (4.38). In the transition region between laminar and turbulent condensation, the condensate ﬁlm is wavy. In Fig. 4.12 this transition region is represented by the dotted lines, according to results from Henstock and Hanratti [4.16]. The literature contains various comments concerning the size of the Reynolds number for this laminar-turbulent transition. As Fig. 4.12 shows, it is not possible to establish a deﬁnite critical Reynolds number, although this has occasionally been attempted. Rather, a transition region with a wavy ﬁlm, follows on directly from the laminar region. The Nusselt number in this region deviates from the values from Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory. This transition region starts at very low Reynolds numbers Retrans , if the Prandtl number is high enough, whilst at low Prandtl numbers, laminar ﬂow is transformed into turbulent ﬂow via a very short transition region. Therefore, we can say that the critical Reynolds number depends on the Prandtl number and can lie well below the critical Reynolds number of 400, at which the transition region roughly ends. If a deviation of 1 % from the values for Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory is permitted, this leads to a Reynolds number of Retrans = 256 P r −0.47 ,

(4.40)

valid for 1 ≤ P r ≤ 10. In addition to this the ﬁlm condensation theory can only be applied if the shear stress exerted by the vapour is small enough. In the turbulent region, at Reynolds numbers above Re = 400, the Nusselt numbers reach values many times greater than those predicted by the ﬁlm condensation theory, in particular when the Prandtl numbers are large. In the transition region, the Nusselt number initially decreases with Reynolds number and once it has gone through a minimum it increases again. At ﬁrst the increased ﬁlm thickness, which grows with the Reynolds number, causes a reduction in heat transfer, but this is overcome by the increasing inﬂuence of the turbulence which leads to improved heat transfer. It should be noted that the local Nusselt numbers are plotted in Fig. 4.12. In a condenser, the Reynolds number formed with the ﬁlm thickness changes from a value of zero, at the beginning of the condensation, to a ﬁnal or end value. In between, within the transition region there may be states where the heat transfer is not particularly good, the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient could be smaller than the local coeﬃcient at the outlet cross section. Fig. 4.13 reproduces the mean heat transfer coeﬃcients associated with Fig. 4.12, according to αm (ϑs − ϑ0) = Δhv M˙ /A , where A is the surface area of the tube and M˙ is the condensate mass ﬂow rate at the bottom end of the tube.

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

463

Fig. 4.13: Mean Nusselt number as a function of the Reynolds number, according to [4.15], in condensation on a vertical tube or a vertical ﬂat wall

As we can see from this, at small Prandtl numbers good heat transfer can be achieved by operating the condenser in the region of Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory, that is at low Reynolds numbers. This can be attained by using short tubes. If, in contrast, the Prandtl number is large, then good heat transfer predominates in the turbulent region, and this can be achieved by using tubes of an adequate length. Isashenko [4.17], has developed simple formulae, originating from the solution of the momentum and energy equations for turbulent ﬂow, for the turbulent ﬁlm region at Reynolds numbers Re ≥ 400. These formulae reproduce well known measured values given in the literature. According to this, the local Nusselt number is given by Nu =

α (νL2 /g)1/3 = 0.0325 Re1/4 P r 1/2 λL

(4.41)

with the Reynolds number Re = (M˙ /b)/ηL = Γ/ηL and the Prandtl number P r of the condensate. The equation is valid in the region 1 ≤ P r ≤ 25 and 400 ≤ Re ≤ 7 · 105 . The Reynolds number of the condensate is obtained from

4/3 1/4 Pr 1/2 Re = 89 + 0.024 P r (Z − 2300) (4.42) P r0 with

cpL (ϑs − ϑ0) 1 x . (4.42a) Δhv P r (νL2 /g)1/3 In these equations all the ﬂuid properties are evaluated at saturation temperature, except the Prandtl number P r0 , which is formed with the wall temperature. From investigations by Labunzov [4.18] the measured heat transfer coeﬃcients deviate at the most by ±12 % from those calculated. Z=

464

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

In the calculation of heat transfer in the transition region between laminar and turbulent ﬁlm condensation, empirical interpolation formulae are well established. One of these types of formulae is 4 4 . (4.43) α = (f αlam )4 + αturb The factor f takes into account here the waviness of the laminar condensate ﬁlm, f ≈ 1.15; αlam is the heat transfer coeﬃcient for laminar ﬁlm condensation from Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory and αturb is that for a turbulent condensate ﬁlm, which is found, for example from (4.41) together with (4.42).

4.1.6

Condensation of ﬂowing vapours

Nusselt extended his ﬁlm condensation theory to take into account the inﬂuence of vapour ﬂowing along the condensate ﬁlm on the velocity of the condensate. The boundary conditions for (4.6) are no longer ∂w/∂y = 0 for y = δ, instead the velocity proﬁle ends with a ﬁnite gradient at the free surface of the ﬁlm corresponding to the shear stress exerted by the ﬂowing vapour. In (4.6) for the velocity proﬁle (L − G )g 2 w=− y + c 1 y + c0 2 ηL the coeﬃcients c1 and c0 now have to be determined, so that the boundary conditions w(y = 0) = 0 and ηL (∂w/∂y)y=δ = ±τδ (4.44) are satisﬁed, where the plus sign holds for downstream ﬂowing vapour, the negative sign is used when the vapour is ﬂowing upstream. With that we obtain the following for the velocity (L − G )g 2 y τδ y y2 w= δ . (4.45) − 2 ± ηL δ 2δ ηL In the calculation of the shear stress which develops at the phase interface, it is assumed that the pressure and frictional forces in the vapour space are equal. The pressure drop along the ﬂow direction dx is dp. For pipe ﬂow we now have τδ d π =

d2 π dp . 4 dx

(4.46)

On the other hand, for the pressure drop it holds that 2 dp G wG =ζ . dx d

With that we have τδ = ζ

2 G wG . 4

(4.47)

(4.48)

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

465

The mean velocity is found to be 1 wm = δ

δ w dy =

(L − G )g 2 τδ δ δ ± 3 ηL 2 ηL

(4.49)

0

and from that the mass ﬂow rate of condensate, which ﬂows through a plane perpendicular to the wall is L (L − G )g b 3 L τδ δ 2 b δ ± . M˙ = wm L b δ = 3 ηL 2 ηL

(4.50)

The ﬁlm thickness, as already shown in section 4.1.2, is found using the energy balance ϑs − ϑ0 b dx = Δhv dM˙ λL δ to be τδ δ 3 4 λ ηL (ϑs − ϑ0 ) 4 = δ4 ± x , (4.51) 3 g (L − G ) L (L − G ) g Δhv and from the calculation of the ﬁlm thickness δ, the heat ﬂux q˙ = λL (ϑs − ϑ0 )/δ transferred is yielded. The shear stress τδ is given by (4.48). If subcooling of the condensate or superheating of the vapour is considered, then in place of the enthalpy of vaporization Δhv the enthalpy diﬀerence Δh∗vs according to (4.29) is used. If the condensation surface is inclined at an angle γ to the vertical, the acceleration due to gravity g is replaced by its component g cos γ parallel to the wall.

Fig. 4.14: Inﬂuence of the vapour shear stress on laminar ﬁlm condensation, according to [4.19]

Rohsenow et al. [4.19] rearranged (4.51) by introducing dimensionless quantities and then determined the heat transfer coeﬃcient α = λL /δ and also the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient αm from the calculated ﬁlm thickness. Fig. 4.14 shows as a result of this the mean Nusselt number αm L N um = λ

466

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

with the characteristic length

L νL2 L := (L − G )g

1/3

plotted against the Reynolds number Re =

wm δ M˙ = , νL b ηL

where b is the width of the ﬂowing condensate ﬁlm, which for condensation on a vertical tube is b = π d. As a parameter, the dimensionless shear stress τδ∗ :=

τδ L(L − G )g

is registered. The results are valid for vapour ﬂowing upstream. The dotted lines indicate the approximate boundary to turbulent ﬁlm condensation.

Fig. 4.15: Film condensation of downward ﬂowing saturated vapour, according to [4.20], Prandtl number P r = 5.0

The laws of conversation of mass, momentum and energy apply to turbulent ﬁlm condensation of ﬂowing vapours as well as to laminar ﬁlm condensation. However, additional information about the mechanisms of the turbulent exchange of mass, momentum and energy is required. The results of this type of calculation provide us, once again, with a temperature proﬁle and from that the heat transfer coeﬃcient. As an example of this Fig. 4.15 shows the results from Dukler [4.19], for the local Nusselt number as a function of the Reynolds number, at a Prandtl

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

467

number P r = 5 and a vapour ﬂow in the downstream direction. The dimensionless quantities are deﬁned in exactly the same manner as those in Fig. 4.14 for laminar ﬂow, thereby enabling the comparison of heat transfer in laminar and turbulent ﬂow. It is also not possible to obtain an analytical expression for turbulent ﬂow, only numerical results are available for the calculated heat transfer coeﬃcient. These can be represented by empirical equations. As a good example for practical usage the particularly simple equation from Shah [4.21] is presented. It contains the relationship (3.259) for convective heat transfer in turbulent single phase ﬂow, in which the exponent for the Prandtl number has merely been increased from 1/3 to 0.4, and an additional term taking the phase change and the eﬀect of vapour ﬂow into account. For the local heat transfer we have 3.8 (1 − x∗)0.04 x∗0.76 0.8 0.4 ∗ 0.8 N u = 0.023 Re P r (1 − x ) + (4.52) p+0.38 with

νL π d2 αd wm d p ˙ , Pr = Nu = , Re = , wm = M / L , p+ = . λL νL 4 aL pcr

The quantity x∗ = M˙ G /M˙ is the mass quality or simply quality in the ﬂow at a cross section of the tube. This equation reproduces the measurements for water, refrigerants R11, R12, R113 and methanol, ethanol, benzene, toluene and trichloroethylene in condensation in vertical, horizontal and inclined tubes with 7 to 40 mm internal diameter, at normalised pressures 0.002 ≤ p+ ≤ 0.44, saturation temperatures 21 ◦ C ≤ ϑs ≤ 310 ◦ C, vapour velocities 3 m/s ≤ wG ≤ 300 m/s, 2 2 mass ﬂuxes 10.8 kg/m2 s ≤ m ˙ ≤ 210.6 kg/m s, heat ﬂuxes 158 W/m ≤ q˙ ≤ 2 6 1.893 · 10 W/m , Reynolds numbers 100 ≤ Re ≤ 63 000, and Prandtl numbers 1 ≤ P r ≤ 13. The mean deviation from the experimental values has been shown to be ±15.4 %. For practical calculations it is recommended that the condenser tube be subdivided into sections in which the change Δx∗ in the quality of the ﬂow is equal. If these sections are not chosen to be too large, a linear drop in the quality can be assumed in each section and then the local heat transfer coeﬃcient in the middle of the section Δx∗ can be calculated according to (4.52). Shah [4.21] states that a subdivision in sections Δx∗ < 0.4 is suﬃcient. The heat transfer coeﬃcient in the middle of the section is approximately equal to the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient α = αm of the section. The area A of the section in question is obtained from Q˙ = km A Δϑm with

(4.53)

δ 1 1 + + , km A αm AC λ Am αmo Ao or, if the heat transfer coeﬃcient is based on the condensate surface AC = A, with 1

=

1 1 δd 1 d 1 1 = + + = + km αm λ dm αmo do αm km

(4.54)

468

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

and Δϑm =

ϑe − ϑi , ln[(ϑG − ϑi )/(ϑG − ϑe )]

(4.55)

where ϑi is the inlet temperature of the cooling medium in the relevant section, ϑe is the outlet (exit) temperature and ϑG is the mean vapour temperature. Example 4.3: In a tube bundle condenser made up of 200 vertical tubes each with 25 mm inner diameter, M˙ G = 8 kg/s of saturated toluene vapour at a pressure of 0.1 MPa is to be condensed. The tubes will be cooled from outside by M˙ W = 60 kg/s of water ﬂowing countercurrent, fed into the condenser at a temperature of 45 ◦ C. The overall heat transfer coeﬃcient of the cooling water up to the tube wall is km = 2500 W/m2 K. Calculate the required tube length. The following properties are given: liquid toluene: density L = 782 kg/m3 , speciﬁc heat capacity cpL = 2.015 kJ/kg K, thermal conductivity λL = 0.126 W/K m, dynamic viscosity ηL = 2.52 · 10−4 kg/sm, Prandtl number P r = 4.03. Further, for toluene G L , the enthalpy of vaporization Δhv = 356 kJ/kg, saturation temperature at 0.1 MPa: ϑs = 383.75 K = 110.6 ◦ C, critical pressure pcr = 4.11 MPa. The speciﬁc heat capacity of the cooling water is cpW = 4.10 kJ/kg K. The condenser power is Q˙ = M˙ G Δhv = 8 kg/s · 356 kJ/kg = 2848 kW, the power for ˙ each tube Q/200 = 14.24 kW. The outlet temperature of the cooling water follows out of Q˙ = M˙ W cpW (ϑWe − ϑWi ) to be ϑWe = ϑWi +

Q˙ 2 848 kW = 45.0 ◦ C + = 56.58 ◦ C . ˙ 60 kg/s · 4.10 kJ/kg K MW cpW

In the calculation of the necessary tube length we will subdivide into four sections with Δx∗ = 0.25. The condensate side heat transfer coeﬃcient comes from (4.52). In this with a condensate amount M˙ = 8(kg/s)/200 = 0.04 kg/s per tube, the Reynolds number is Re =

M˙ 0.04 kg/s = = 8 084 . ηL d π/4 2.52 · 10−4 kg/s m · (25 · 10−3 ) · π/4

According to (4.52) we get 3.8 (1 − x∗ )0.04 x∗0.76 (1 − x∗ )0.8 + p+0.38 0.126 W/K m 3.8 · (1 − x∗ )0.04 · x∗0.76 0.8 0.4 ∗ 0.8 = · 0.023 · 8 084 · 4.03 · (1 − x ) + , 25 · 10−3 m (2.433 · 10−2 )0.38 α = 270.63 (W/m2 K) (1 − x∗ )0.8 + 15.597 (1 − x∗ )0.04 x∗0.76 . α =

λL 0.023 Re0.8 P r 0.4 d

In the ﬁrst section 1.0 ≥ x∗ ≥ 0.75 the mean quality is (1.0 + 0.75)/2 = 0.875. This yields from the previous equation a mean heat transfer coeﬃcient of α = αm = 270.63 W/m2 K (1 − 0.875)0.8 + 15.597 · (1 − 0.875)0.04 · 0.8750.76 = 3 560 W/m2 K . From (4.54), the mean overall heat transfer coeﬃcient of this section is 1 1 1 1 1 = + = + km αm km 3 560 W/m2 K 2 500 W/m2 K km

= km1 = 1 469 W/m2 K .

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

469

The heat ﬂow transferred in the ﬁrst section is 14.24 kW/4 = 3.56 kW = Q˙ 1 . The cooling water enters the ﬁrst section at a temperature of ϑWi1 = ϑWe −

Q˙ 1 3.56 kW = 53.69 ◦ C . = 56.58 ◦ C − 0.3 kg/s · 4.10 kJ/kg K M˙ W1 cpW

The logarithmic mean temperature according to (4.55) is Δϑm1 =

56.58 − 53.69 K = 55.4 K . ln[(110.6 − 53.69)/(110.6 − 56.58)]

With that, the area of the ﬁrst section follows from (4.53) A1 =

Q˙ 1 3.56 · 103 W = = 4.374 · 10−2 m2 . km1 Δϑm1 1 469 W/m2 K · 55.4 K

The associated tube length is L1 =

x∗

x∗m

αm 2

A1 4.374 · 10−2 m2 = = 0.56 m . dπ 25 · 10−3 m · π

km 2

W/m K W/m K 1.0

ϑW

Δϑm

◦

◦

C

C

56.58 0.875

3557

1468

0.75 2960

1355

0.5 2149

1156

0.25 1106

768

0.0

m 0.56

58.3

4.507 · 10−2

0.57

61.0

5.05 · 10−2

0.64

63.9

7.25 · 10−2

0.92

47.90 0.125

L

4.377 · 10−2

50.80 0.375

m

2

55.4 53.69

0.625

A

45

A corresponding calculationfor all the sections yields the values listed in the table. The total length of the tubes is L = Ltot = 2.69 m ≈ 2.7 m.

4.1.7

Dropwise condensation

As we have already explained in section 4.1.1., if the condensate does not completely wet the wall, individual liquid droplets form instead of a continuous condensate ﬁlm. Heat transfer coeﬃcients in dropwise condensation are signiﬁcantly larger than in ﬁlm condensation. In the condensation of steam, the heat transfer coeﬃcients measured have been a factor of four to eight times larger. However, it has been shown that all investigated substances, in particular water, which condense on commonly used heating surfaces, will completely wet the surface. This is true as long as the material of the heated surface and the liquid have not been contaminated. This also corresponds to the experience that the formation of a water ﬁlm is taken to be an indication that laboratory equipment is well cleaned.

470

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

The type of condensation is chieﬂy inﬂuenced by foreign substances absorbed on the solid surface. They lead to locally ﬁnite values of the contact angle and so cause incomplete wetting. Foreign substances that come into question are those added to water as antiwetting agents (injected substances, promoters). Occasionally such foreign substance may be unintentionally present in the vapour, for example, the lubricating oil from a boiler feed pump, even a small amount dissolved in the condensate is suﬃcient to generate dropwise concentration. The addition of waxy substances has also been suggested [4.22]. The maintenance of a stable dropwise condensation requires a constant or periodic feed of the injected substance, as over the course of time it is removed from the surface by washing or dissolution in the condensate. The formation of droplets is also inﬂuenced by the roughness of the wall and its height, as well as the heat ﬂux and the temperature diﬀerence. Thin gold layers applied by electrolysis and noble metal plating of gold, rhodium, palladium and platinum have all proved to be eﬀective as promoters. However, as experiments have shown [4.23], these have to be of a certain minimum thickness, which for gold layers is around 0.2 μm, in order to maintain a lasting dropwise condensation. Although this layer thickness is only half the size of the wave length of visible light, the necessary amount of gold is in no way small. It amounts to 3.8 g per m2 of heating surface. This means, even if gold prices were around 15 000 US-$ per kilo as in the past, this would cost about 57 US-$ per m2 heating surface for the plating alone. This produces ﬁve to seven times better heat transfer for the condensation of steam, [4.23]. Nevertheless, the high expenditure means that the gold plating would only be made use of in very special cases, otherwise ﬁlm condensation will be preferred. Even when the type of condensation is not precisely known, ﬁlm condensation is assumed for the calculation of condensers, so that the condenser area will be suﬃcient. Experiments on dropwise condensation are diﬃcult as they entail the measurement of temperature diﬀerences of 1 K or less for the determination of the heat transfer coeﬃcient. At these small temperature diﬀerences the wall temperature ﬂuctuates with time and also locally. The cost of the measuring techniques for the achievement of accurate results is, therefore, considerable. The photographs in Fig. 4.16 are a good illustration of dropwise condensation on a vertical surface. The small droplets grow due to subsequent condensation from the vapour space and coalescing. As soon as a certain drop size has been reached, the drop rolls downwards and in the process of this takes the drops lying along its path with it. Behind the rolling drop new drops appear immediately. They form predominantly on the water left behind and on scratches on the condensation area. According to experiments by Krischer and Grigull [4.24], the nucleation site density is mainly dependent on the subcooling of the heating area. Experiments with condensing steam on copper and brass surfaces, with subcooling of the surface by 0.1 K, yield a nucleation site density of approximately 3 · 103 nuclei per mm2 of the heating area, whilst with subcooling of 0.4 K the nucleation site density lay at 15 · 103 nuclei per mm2 . Fig. 4.17 shows the results for heat transfer in dropwise condensation. Most condensation areas were made of copper. Diﬀerent liquids served as promoters; they were spread over the cooling surface. Depending on the promoter and the material for the condensation surface very diﬀerent results were found. As we can see, individual experimental results for the heat ﬂux

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

471

Fig. 4.16: Dropwise condensation on a vertical condensation surface, according to Krischer and Grigull [4.24]. a Start of condensation; b Condensation form after 16 s; c Condensation form after 32 s. The traces of the droplets rolling downwards are clearly recognisable. Above, in picture b a drop is just leaving. q˙ = 0.12 W/cm2 , Δϑ = 0.05 K. Diameter of the condensation surface: 18 mm

vary by as much as a factor of 30 from each other. Curves 2, 5, and 6 from Wenzel [4.26], Le F`evre and Rose [4.29] and Tanner et al. [4.30], have weakly increasing gradients and only deviate slightly from one another. In Fig. 4.18, the results from [4.30] and [4.32] together with those from Krischer and Grigull [4.24] are drawn separately. Several theories on dropwise condensation have been developed for the calculation of heat transfer. One of the oldest theories, that from Eucken [4.33], starts with the concept that the ﬁrst droplets arise from an adsorbed monomolecular condensate layer, this layer is favoured by nuclei, and that the new condensate ﬂows to the droplets by means of surface diﬀusion which primarily occurs at the edge of the drop. This theory was taken on later by other authors [4.34], [4.35] and developed further. Other theories presuppose that a thin, unstable water ﬁlm exists between the drops, that, once a critical thickness of a few μm has been reached, collapses and vanishes into the droplets [4.36]. This concept has since been disproved by experiment [4.37], [4.38]. The idea that agrees best with experiments is that initially tiny drops form at nuclei sites,

472

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

at depressions in the condensation surface or on the remnants of liquids. Their growth rate is determined by the resistance to thermal conduction in the drops and also partly by the thermal conduction resistances at the phase interface with the vapour. The growth rate is therefore only dependent on the speciﬁc drop radius and the driving temperature diﬀerence. This has also been conﬁrmed by experiment [4.24]. The main reasons behind the lack of success in developing an explicit theory are that the nucleation site density is unknown, and it is diﬃcult to predict the radius of the rolling drops, as this depends on the purity and smoothness of the condensation surface as well as the interfacial tension.

Fig. 4.17: Experimental results for dropwise condensation of water at a condensation pressure of about 1 bar according to ¨ [4.24]. 1 Hampson and Ozisik 1952, graph for two diﬀerent promoters [4.25]; 2 Wenzel 1957 [4.26]; 3 Welch and Westwater 1961 [4.27]; 4 Kast 1965, chromium-plated (upper line) and plain copper surfaces [4.28]; 5 Le F`evre and Rose 1965, diﬀerent promoters [4.29]; 6 Tanner et al. 1968, diﬀerent promoters [4.30]; 7 Griﬃth and Lee 1967, goldplated condensation surfaces: upper curve, copper, middle curve, zinc and lower curve, steel [4.31]

Fig. 4.18: Experimental results at around 0.03 bar condensation pressure, according to [4.24]. Dotted lines: interpolated values 8 from measurements by Tanner et al. [4.30] a) Promoter “Montan wax” and b) Promoter “Dioctadecyldisulﬁde”; 9 Measurements from Brown and Thomas [4.32]

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

4.1.8

473

Condensation of vapour mixtures

In the process industry, vapour mixtures are frequently liquiﬁed with all the components being present in the liquid phase. Alternatively, the vapour mixture may contain inert gases that do not condense. The inﬂuence of this type of mixture on the heat transfer in condensation has already been dealt with in section 4.1.4. Therefore, the variation in the heat transfer for a condensate that contains all the components, in larger or smaller amounts, still has to be discussed. Depending on the purpose for the application the vapour can either be completely or only partially condensed so that the vapour leaving the condenser generally has a diﬀerent composition from that entering it. This type of apparatus is known as a partial condenser or in rectiﬁcation columns it is called a dephlegmator. Its purpose is to separate the higher boiling point components from a vapour by condensation. These apparatus operate with smaller temperature diﬀerences between the vapour and the cooling medium than a condenser, in which the vapour should be totally condensed. As the components with the higher boiling points normally condense ﬁrst out of a vapour mixture, and the vapour left is lacking in these components, a concentration proﬁle which varies along the ﬂow direction forms. This decisively aﬀects the heat transfer. This suggests, that for the calculation of the heat and mass transfer, it would be sensible to subdivide the ﬂow path into individual sections, and then solve the mass and energy balances for each section, taking the laws of heat and mass transfer into consideration. Calculations of this type for binary mixtures are only possible with the assistance of a computer. In the discussions presented here we want to limit ourselves to an explanation of the fundamental physical processes along with an illustration of the decisive balance equations. As the process of condensation in multicomponent mixtures with more than two components is similar to that in binary mixtures, we will limit ourselves to the consideration of binary mixtures. When a binary mixture, whose boiling and dew point lines are shown in Fig. 4.19, condenses on a cooled wall of temperature ϑ0 , a condensate forms, Fig. 4.19b, which is bounded by the vapour. At the phase interface, a temperature ϑI develops, which lies between the temperature ϑG of the vapour far away from the wall and the wall temperature ϑ0 . If the vapour is saturated, its temperature is ϑG = ϑs corresponding to Fig. 4.19a. The temperature proﬁle in the vapour and condensate are illustrated in Fig. 4.19c. In general, at the phase interface the components with the higher boiling points preferentially change from vapour to condensate. As a result of this the vapour mixture at the phase interface contains more of the more volatile component than at a large distance away from it. A concentration proﬁle like that presented in Fig. 4.19d develops. The concentration of the more volatile component increases towards the phase interface. At steady-state, the molecules of the more volatile

474

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

Fig. 4.19: Temperature-concentration diagram for a binary mixture as well as the temperature and concentration proﬁles in the vapour and the condensate. Indices: 0 cold wall, I interface, G core ﬂow of vapour (G Gas). a boiling and dew point lines; b condensate and vapour boundary layer; c temperature proﬁle; d concentration proﬁle

component that have not condensed at the condensate surface will be transported back into the vapour by diﬀusion. In the condensate the momentum, heat and mass transfer by convection can be neglected compared to that by conduction and diﬀusion, due to the low velocity of the condensate in comparison to that of the vapour. This applies as long as the Prandtl or Schmidt number is not too small. In the condensate ﬁlm Nusselt’s assumptions are once more valid, according to which the ﬂow is only determined by the frictional and ﬁeld (gravity) forces, whilst the temperature proﬁle is mainly determined by heat conduction. The concentration over a cross section of the condensate ﬁlm is constant because the wall does not let any of the material through and convective mass transport in the liquid ﬁlm is negligible. This can easily be seen, as the diﬀusion equation for these preconditions, known as Fick’s second law, is ∂ ∂c D =0 , ∂y ∂y where y is the coordinate perpendicular to the wall, D is the diﬀusion coeﬃcient and c = N/V is the concentration of one of the components in a binary mixture. Integrating this equation, under the boundary conditions ∂c = 0 and c(y = δ) = cI , ∂y y=0 it immediately follows that c = cW = cI = const. Therefore, we also have the case illustrated in Fig. 4.19d, x˜ = x˜W = x˜I = const. The concentration proﬁle is decisively inﬂuenced by the ﬂow and the type of ﬂow conﬁguration. In the usual cocurrent ﬂow of vapour and condensate,

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

475

Fig. 4.20: Condensation in a co- and b countercurrent. In case a the falling liquid contains more of the more volatile components than in b. In b molecules of the more volatile components cross into the vapour, because the less volatile components rising up the column condense and drive out the more volatile molecules.

presented in Fig. 4.20a, the components with the higher boiling points go preferentially from vapour to condensate. The fraction of the components with lower boiling points increases downstream in the vapour from the initial composition y˜α to the ﬁnal composition y˜ω . The amount of condensate at the inlet is large, the result of which is that a great deal of the high boiling point components will be drawn out of the vapour. The behaviour in countercurrent ﬂow, Fig. 4.20b, like the ﬂow which exists in falling ﬁlm columns or in the reﬂux condensers in rectiﬁcation columns, is diﬀerent. Here, the vapour, of initial composition y˜α meets a thick condensate ﬁlm. The amount of vapour that condenses is smaller, and less of the high boiling point components are drawn out of the vapour than in the cocurrent case. The rising vapour comes into contact with an increasingly thinner condensate ﬁlm of the falling liquid. The amount of condensate increases and the higher boiling point components of the vapour condense preferentially. The condensation enthalpy released causes evaporation of the low boiling point components. This is indicated by the horizontal arrows in Fig. 4.20b. Mass exchange takes place between the liquid and vapour by “rectiﬁcation”, through which the vapour leaving contains more, and correspondingly the condensate leaving at the bottom fewer, of the more volatile components, than in the case of cocurrent ﬂow according to Fig. 4.20b. So, if a condensate rich in the less volatile components is desired, a countercurrent ﬂow conﬁguration is preferable. This eﬀect was ﬁrst described by Claude [4.39] more than 80 years ago. The vapour ﬂowing downstream contains more of the more volatile components in countercurrent ﬂow than in cocurrent ﬂow. However, in cocurrent ﬂow the condensate is held up as a result of the shear stress exerted by the vapour, and with that the heat transfer worsens. It is obvious that the ﬂow conﬁguration is decisive for mass transfer and therefore also for heat transfer. In general it holds that due to the concentration ﬁeld at the phase interface, a resistance to mass transfer develops that hinders the

476

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

Fig. 4.21: Reduction of the heat ﬂow rate in the condensation of methanol/water. a relative heat ﬂux q/ ˙ q˙0 as a function of the temperature ϑ∞ ; b boiling diagram

mass ﬂow towards the phase interface. As a result of this, the heat transfer in condensing vapour mixtures is lower than that in pure vapours, for the same temperature drop. This reduction can assume considerable values. As an example of this, Fig. 4.21a shows the relative heat ﬂux q/ ˙ q˙0 plotted against the temperature ϑ∞ , which in this case shall be equal to the saturation temperature along the dew point line. As we can see, the heat ﬂux q˙ transferred is signiﬁcantly smaller than the heat ﬂux q˙0 , that would be transferred if no resistance to mass transfer in the vapour had to be overcome, so that the condensate surface would be at the saturation temperature ϑ∞ . The continuous lines are valid for condensation of a vapour mixture of methanol (CH3 OH) and water (H2 O) with negligible gravitational eﬀects, i.e. on a horizontal plate or when the vapour velocity is large 2 enough, and so the Froude number Fr = w∞ /g x is very large. The dashed lines are valid for condensation at small Froude numbers, for example on a vertical wall with free convection of the vapour. Similarly to Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory, in the condensation of vapour mixtures, the heat ﬂux transferred increases with the driving temperature diﬀerence ϑ∞ − ϑ0 , where ϑ0 stands for the wall temperature. According to Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory, the heat transfer coeﬃcient decreases with the driving temperature diﬀerence according to α ∼ (ϑ∞ − ϑ0)−1/4 , (4.12). The heat ﬂux increases in accordance with q˙ ∼ (ϑ∞ − ϑ0 )3/4 . Fig. 4.21a shows clearly that a minimum for the transferred heat ﬂux exists at a certain temperature ϑ∞ . This is because the temperature diﬀerence ϑI − ϑ0 between the condensate surface and the wall, which is decisive for heat transfer, also assumes a minimum; this can be explained by the boiling diagram, Fig. 4.21. We will presume a suﬃciently large temperature diﬀerence ϑ∞ − ϑ0 , such that the vapour in its initial state

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

477

A condenses, and a condensate accumulates. This is indicated by point B in Fig. 4.21b. The temperature ϑI at the phase interface is then equal to the boiling point of the liquid mixture and the composition of the accumulated condensate is identical to that of the vapour. This is known as local total condensation. The wall temperature, which is assumed to be constant, is characterised by point C. The line BC corresponds to the temperature diﬀerence ϑI − ϑ0 that is decisive for the heat ﬂux q. ˙ If Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory was also valid for vapour mixtures, then q˙ ∼ (ϑI − ϑ0 )3/4. If ϑ∞ − ϑ0 is kept constant and the temperature ϑ∞ , is increased, then by following the curve in Fig. 4.21a, ϑ∞ − ϑ0 = const in the direction of increasing temperature ϑ∞ , then the distance BC in Fig. 4.21b can once again be measured, if a line parallel to the dewpoint line is drawn through point C. The distance AC = ϑ∞ − ϑ0 remains, by presumption, unchanged, whilst BC will ﬁrst be smaller and then larger. The relative heat ﬂux q/ ˙ q˙0 changes in the same ratio. If, on the other hand, the temperature of the vapour ϑ∞ is kept constant and the temperature diﬀerence ϑ∞ − ϑ0 is made smaller by raising the wall temperature, the ϑ0 -line running through point C in Fig. 4.21b has to be moved upwards. This means that the values of the heat ﬂux q˙ and the relative heat ﬂux q/ ˙ q˙0 will be smaller. 4.1.8.1

The temperature at the phase interface

As the previous discussions have shown, the calculation of heat transfer in ﬁlm condensation of vapour mixtures requires that the temperature ϑI at the phase interface is known. Thermodynamic equilibrium exists between liquid and vapour at the phase interface of a condensate ﬁlm. The temperature ϑI is easy to calculate if the accumulated condensate has the same composition as the vapour at every position. In this case it agrees with respective temperature on the boiling line, and for example is determined by point B in Fig. 4.21b. In order to reach this temperature, the wall temperature ϑ0 = ϑC according to Fig. 4.21b, has to lie suﬃciently below the boiling point ϑB . As a general rule, it should be ϑB − ϑC > 2 (ϑA − ϑB ). The condensation rate has, according to this, to be adequately large, which is why we speak of local total condensation. In technical condensers this condition is satisﬁed, though there are cases, such as in partial condensation, where the wall temperature is deliberately chosen to be higher so that the more volatile component is barely or not present in the condensate. In order to show how the temperature at the phase interface is found, we will consider a binary mixture and establish the mass balance at the condensate surface. The mass ﬂow M˙ G of the vapour perpendicular to the phase interface condenses there and M˙ L is removed as condensate. We have M˙ G = M˙ L = M˙ . For the sake of simplicity we will assume the ﬁlm theory to be valid, according to which the velocity and concentration proﬁles are only dependent on the

478

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

coordinate y normal to the wall. With this assumption the continuity equation for the component 1 being considered is ∂ M˙ 1 =0 , ∂y where y signiﬁes the coordinate normal to the wall. This equation can, due to ˜ 1 N˙ 1 with the molar mass M ˜ 1 and the molar ﬂow rate N˙ 1 (SI units mol/s), M˙ 1 = M also be written as ∂ N˙ 1 =0 . (4.56) ∂y The mass ﬂow in the gas is made up of the diﬀusional ﬂow j1 A (SI units of j1 : mol/m2 s) and the convective ﬂow y˜1 N˙ , where N˙ is the total molar ﬂow rate and y˜ = y˜1 is N˙ 1 = j1 A + y˜ N˙ . (4.57) According to Fick’s law, we obtain j1 = −D c

∂ y˜ ∂y

(4.58)

with c = N/V . The coordinate y runs perpendicular to the condensate surface and points from it into the vapour space. With (4.58), equation (4.57), after division by N˙ , can also be written as j1 ∂ y˜/∂y N˙ = = −D c . A N˙ 1 /N˙ − y˜ N˙ 1 /N˙ − y˜

(4.59)

As the molar ﬂux of each of the two components is independent of the position coordinate y, the total molar ﬂux N˙ /A and likewise the quotient N˙ 1 /N˙ are also independent of y. Therefore (4.59) can be integrated easily. The integration extends from the condensate surface (index I) to the vapour space (index G). The thickness of the vapour boundary layer will be δ. We assume constant values for the pressure and temperature. Under the assumption that the gas phase exhibits ideal behaviour, the diﬀusion coeﬃcient and the molar concentration c = N/V = p/(Rm T ) are likewise independent of the coordinate y. The integration yields N˙ N˙ 1 /N˙ − y˜G δ = D c ln A N˙ 1 /N˙ − y˜I and after the introduction of the mass transfer coeﬃcient βG = D/δ N˙ N˙ 1 /N˙ − y˜G . = n˙ = βG c ln A N˙ 1 /N˙ − y˜I

(4.60)

This result can also be obtained from (1.192) of ﬁlm theory, that was derived earlier, if we apply it to the vapour phase and solve for n. ˙

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

479

In (4.60) the molar ﬂow rate at the phase interface I is given by N˙ 1 /A = (c1 w1 )G = (c1 w1 )L and N˙ /A = (c u)G = (c u)L , where u is the molar average velocity according to (1.157). With that the ratio is N˙ 1 /N˙ = (c1 w1 )L /(c u)L . As no diﬀusion takes place in the liquid phase, we have according to (1.158) w1 = u, and as a result of this it also holds that N˙ 1 /N˙ = c1 /c = n1 /n = x˜1 . This value is to be taken at the phase interface, so that we can write N˙ 1 = x˜1I = x˜I . N˙ If a vapour condenses out of a mixture with an inert gas, then x˜I = 1 and from (4.60) the known equation (4.31) is obtained. As the quotient (˜ xI − y˜G )/(˜ xI − y˜I ) in (4.60) is smaller than one, the molar ﬂux will be negative. The mass ﬂow of the condensing vapour is in the opposite direction to the surface coordinate y chosen by us. As we are only interested in the absolute size of the mass ﬂux, we can write |n| ˙ = βG c ln

y˜I − x˜I . y˜G − x˜I

(4.61)

(4.61) contains two limiting cases: a) In local total condensation the composition of the liquid is identical to that ˙ → ∞ for the molar ﬂux of the vapour of the vapour x˜I = y˜G . This gives |n| ﬂowing towards the condensate surface. In order to achieve local total condensation, the wall temperature has to be far enough below the boiling point of all the components, so that they all condense and the condensate has the same composition as the vapour. b) For vanishingly small molar ﬂux of the existing condensate |n| ˙ → 0, according to (4.61) the vapour composition is y˜G = y˜I . Hardly any condensate forms, the result of which is that no concentration proﬁle develops in the vapour space. Both limiting cases are presented in Fig. 4.22. Actual condensation rates lie between the two extremes. The temperature ϑI at the phase interface lies, as can be seen in Fig. 4.22, between the temperature on the dew point line (case b) and the temperature on the boiling line (case a). The associated vapour and liquid compositions can be read oﬀ the abcissa, points B and A in Fig. 4.22. For the calculation of the temperature ϑI at the phase interface, the energy equation at the condensate surface is required as a further balance equation ˜v , ˙ Δh q˙L = q˙G + |n|

(4.62)

where q˙L is the heat ﬂux removed from the condensate by convection, q˙G is the ˜ v is the heat ﬂux fed to the condensate from the vapour by convection and Δh molar enthalpy of vaporization of the mixture. We have q˙L = αL (ϑI − ϑ0 ) ,

(4.63)

480

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

Fig. 4.22: Limiting cases in condensation

Fig. 4.23: Mole fractions and temperature at the condensate surface

where ϑ0 stands for the wall temperature. On the other hand, this heat ﬂux is also transferred through the wall to the cooling medium, which is at a temperature of ϑc . The overall heat transfer coeﬃcient between the wall and the cooling medium is k . Then (4.64) q˙L = k (ϑ0 − ϑc ) . Using (4.63), ϑ0 can be eliminated, giving q˙L =

αL (ϑI − ϑc ) . (αL /k ) + 1

(4.65)

In the case of a very large overall heat transfer coeﬃcient k → ∞ the wall temperature ϑ0 is constant and equal to the temperature ϑc of the cooling medium. The heat ﬂux transferred from the vapour to the condensate surface is • (ϑG − ϑI ) . q˙G = αG

(4.66)

It contains the fraction for the heat transfer at the phase interface due to the temperature drop ϑG − ϑI and the fraction for the energy transported through the vapour to the condensate surface. If the heat ﬂux q˙G from (4.66) together with the heat ﬂux q˙L from (4.65), are inserted into the energy balance (4.62), and, noting that the molar ﬂux of the condensate is given by (4.61), then the following is obtained for the energy balance αL y˜I − x˜I ˜ • (ϑI − ϑK ) = αG (ϑG − ϑI ) + βG c ln Δhv . (αL /k ) + 1 y˜G − x˜I

(4.67)

The unknown temperature ϑI can be calculated from this equation. However, it still has to be considered that the mole fractions x˜I , y˜I depend on the temperature ϑI , as Fig. 4.23 indicates for a binary mixture. In addition to this the heat transfer coeﬃcient αL is dependent on the temper• ature ϑI . As free convection frequently occurs in the vapour, the term αG (ϑG −ϑI )

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

481

can often not be neglected, but can be of the same magnitude as the other expressions in (4.67), in particular when the temperature at the phase interface ϑI is close to the wall temperature. This means that the driving temperature drop ϑI − ϑ0 will be small in the condensate, whilst in contrast, that in the vapour ϑG − ϑI will be large. The practical calculation of the temperature ϑI at the condensate surface is time consuming and, even in the case discussed here for a binary mixture, cannot be easily carried out without a computer. 4.1.8.2

The material and energy balance for the vapour

In the calculation of the temperature ϑI at the phase interface, the area A of the condenser is subdivided into sections ΔA. Each section is assigned uniﬁed (mean) values for the temperatures ϑI , ϑG and the composition y˜G . With help from (4.67) the temperature ϑI can be obtained for given values of ϑG , y˜G . In order to calculate the values ϑG , y˜G of any section from the values for the previous section, the material and energy balances have to be solved. In setting up the material balance we will consider a section of area dA, as shown on the right hand side of Fig. 4.24. The material balance for the more volatile component is N˙ G y˜G = (N˙ G + dN˙ G ) (˜ yG + d˜ yG ) + dN˙ x˜I . The mole fraction y˜G of the more volatile components here is, like in (4.67), an integral mean value over a cross section of the vapour space. From the last relationship with dN˙ = − dN˙ G the so-called Rayleigh equation is obtained dN˙ G − d˜ yG = . (4.68) y˜G − x˜I N˙ G After integration between cross sections 1 and 2, Fig. 4.24 left, this delivers the expression y˜G2 d˜ yG N˙ G1 ln = , ˙ y˜G − x˜I NG2 y˜G1

from which the accumulated condensate in the section of area ΔA is calculated ⎛ ⎞⎞ ⎛ y˜ G2 d˜ yG ⎠⎠ . (4.69) |n| ˙ ΔA = N˙ G1 − N˙ G2 = N˙ G1 ⎝1 − exp ⎝− y˜G − x˜I y˜G1

Fig. 4.24: Material balance in a section of a condenser

482

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

Once the temperature ϑI at the phase interface has been found using (4.67), the molar condensate ﬂow according to (4.61) is also known. Then, from (4.69), the mole fraction y˜G2 of the vapour in the next section ΔA can be calculated. The energy balance for the area shown in Fig. 4.25 is ˜ G + dh ˜ G ) + dN˙ h ˜ G + q˙G dA . N˙ G ˜hG = (N˙ G + dN˙ G ) (h I

Fig. 4.25: Energy balance in a section of a condenser

With dN˙ = − dN˙ G , it follows that ˜ G − ˜hGI) + N˙ G dh ˜ G + q˙G dA . 0 = − dN˙ (h Now, we have d|N˙ | = |n| ˙ dA with |n| ˙ according to (4.61). This yields ˜G − h ˜ GI ) dA + q˙G dA ˙ (h − N˙ G d˜hG = |n|

(4.70)

˜G − h ˜ GI = c˜pG (ϑG − ϑI ) and q˙G = α• (ϑG − ϑI ). This ˜ G = c˜pG dϑG , h with dh G ˜ GI depend equation cannot be integrated analytically, as the enthalpies ˜hG and h on the varying temperature and the mole fraction along the ﬂow path. As long as the section of area ΔA is not chosen to be too large, a good approach is to work with forwards diﬀerences. Then ˜ G2 − h ˜ G1 ) = |n| ˜ G1 − h ˜ GI ) ΔA + q˙G ΔA . ˙ (h − N˙ G1 (h

(4.71)

The enthalpy ˜hG2 of the following section is obtained from this relationship, and with that also its temperature, because we have ˜G = h ˜ 01 (ϑG ) y˜G + h ˜ 02 (ϑG ) (1 − y˜G ) and h ˜ GI = h ˜ 01 (ϑI ) y˜I + h ˜ 02(ϑI ) (1 − y˜I ) , h

(4.72)

˜ 02 are the temperature dependent molar enthalpies of the pure ˜ 01 and h where h substances 1 and 2. As we have assumed the gas phase as ideal, the pressure dependence of the enthalpy is not considered. In (4.71) the heat ﬂux released by • • (ϑG − ϑI ) the heat transfer coeﬃcient αG of the gas at the gas phase is q˙G = αG the phase interface is diﬀerent from that for a vapour ﬂow without condensation, αG . According to (4.32) it is • αG = α G ζG , in which the correction factor ζ is given by the “Ackermann correction” (4.33).

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

4.1.8.3

483

Calculating the size of a condenser

The practical calculation for binary mixtures, based on the equations presented, is now possible in various ways. The following procedure is recommended – Take a section of area ΔA and estimate the temperature ϑI at the surface of the condensate in this section. It is ϑG < ϑI < ϑc , where ϑG is the temperature of the vapour and ϑc is that of the cooling medium. With this estimate of ϑI the mole fractions x˜I and y˜I at the condesate surface are ﬁxed based on the phase equilibrium. – Estimate the change Δ˜ yG in the vapour composition in the relevant section and approximate yG1 + y˜G2 )/2 with y˜G2 = y˜G1 + Δ˜ yG , y˜G = (˜

–

–

– –

where y˜G1 is the vapour composition in the inlet cross section 1 and y˜G2 is that in the outlet 2 of the section being considered. • With these estimated values the vapour side heat transfer coeﬃcient αG and the mass transfer coeﬃcient βG can be calculated. Just as the heat transfer coeﬃcient αL of the condensate ﬁlm is also known, which in laminar ﬁlm condensation is yielded from Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory (4.39), and for turbulent ﬁlm condensation from (4.41). From (4.67) the temperature ϑI at the condensate surface can be determined. If this does not agree with the estimate, then a new estimate of the temperature ϑI has to be made, until the calculated and estimated values agree with each other to a suﬃcient degree of accuracy. In the next step the accumulated ﬂow of the condensate |n| ˙ is calculated using (4.69). If this agrees with the value found from (4.61), then the initial estimate with respect to the change y˜G in the composition of the vapour was correct. If this does not occur the calculation has to be repeated until the estimate and calculated value agree with each other. Once all these steps have been carried out the temperatures and the composition in the following segment can be investigated. As long as the vapour is superheated, ϑG > ϑD , (ϑD is the dew point), as shown in Fig. 4.26, it is advisable to calculate the vapour temperature in the following section using (4.71) and then go through the steps explained above to ﬁnd the other quantities. If the vapour is cooled to the dew point ϑD , the energy equation (4.71) no longer has to be solved, because the vapour temperature ϑG = ϑD , as is apparent in Fig. 4.26, is only dependent on the mole fraction y˜G .

How the vapour temperature ϑG the mole fractions y˜G , y˜I , and the temperature ϑI can vary along the condenser is illustrated schematically in Fig. 4.26.

484

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

Fig. 4.26: Temperatures ϑG , ϑI and composition y˜G , y˜I , x ˜I along a condenser. i = inlet, o = outlet state of the vapour

4.1.9

Some empirical equations

In the following the equations introduced previously are summarised and supplemented by further equations. 1. Laminar ﬁlm condensation on vertical or inclined plates, and on the inside or outside of a vertical tube. According to Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory, from (4.13a), under the assumption G L , the heat transfer coeﬃcient follows as −1/3 1/3 αm νL2 M˙ /b = 0.925 = 0.925 Re −1/3 . N um = λL g ηL The local heat transfer coeﬃcient is α = 3 αm /4. If the wall is inclined at an angle γ to the vertical then the acceleration due to gravity g has to be replaced by its component parallel to the wall g cos γ with 0 ≤ γ < π/2. The equation also holds for condensation of quiescent vapours on the inside or outside of a vertical tube, if the diameter of the tube is large in comparison to the ﬁlm thickness. The width b has to be replaced by b = π d. If a deviation of 1 % from the values from Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory is permitted, then the equation is valid up to a Reynolds number Retrans = 256 P r −0.47

with 1 ≤ P r ≤ 10 .

2. Laminar ﬁlm condensation on horizontal tubes. According to (4.15a), with G L, the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient is −1/3 αm, hor (νL2 /g)1/3 M˙ /L N um = = 0.959 = 0.959 Re−1/3 . λL ηL L is the tube length.

4.1 Heat transfer in condensation

485

3. Turbulent ﬁlm condensation on vertical or inclined plates and on the inside or outside of vertical tubes. The local heat transfer coeﬃcient, for Re ≥ 400 is found from (4.41) Nu =

α (νL2 /g)1/3 = 0.0325 Re 1/4 P r 1/2 λL

with

4/3 1/4 M˙ /b Pr 1/2 Re = = 89 + 0.024 P r (Z − 2300) ηL P r0 and Z=

x cpL (ϑs − ϑ0 ) 1 . Δhv P r (νL2 /g)1/3

4. Transition region between laminar and turbulent ﬁlm condensation. In the transition region 256 P r −0.44 ≤ Retrans ≤ 400 between laminar and turbulent ﬁlm condensation, the heat transfer coeﬃcient according to (4.43) is obtained from 4 . α = 4 (f αlam )4 + αturb The factor f ≈ 1.15 accounts for the wave formation on the laminar condensate ﬁlm. 5. Turbulent ﬁlm condensation of vapour ﬂowing in tubes. According to Shah [4.21], (4.52), for the local heat transfer we have 3.8 (1 − x∗ )0.04 x∗0.76 0.8 0.4 ∗ 0.8 N u = 0.023 Re P r (1 − x ) + p+0.38 with Nu =

π d2 wm d p αd νL , Re = , wm = M˙ / L and p+ = . , Pr = λL νL 4 aL pcr

The region of validity is 100 ≤ Re ≤ 63 000,

1 ≤ P r ≤ 13,

0.002 ≤ p+ ≤ 0.44 .

Further details regarding the region of validity can be found on p. 467 6. Stratiﬁed ﬂow in horizontal tubes. In horizontal tubes, at low ﬂow velocities, the liquid ﬁlm that develops is not annular, but stratiﬁed. The condensate collects in the lower part of

486

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

the tube, whilst the upper walls are wetted by the liquid. Stratiﬁed ﬂow appears if the dimensionless vapour velocity is ∗ = wG

x∗ M˙ 1/2

A [g d G (L − G )]

≤1

and if the following holds for the liquid fraction 1−ε AL = AG ε

with ε =

AG A

and A = AG + AL .

1−ε ≤ 0.5 . ε The mean heat transfer coeﬃcient is given by αm = 0.728 ε

4.2

2L g Δ hv λ3L 1 ηL (ϑs − ϑ0 ) d

1/4 .

Heat transfer in boiling

Whilst heat transfer in convection can be described by physical quantities such as viscosity, density, thermal conductivity, thermal expansion coeﬃcients and by geometric quantities, in boiling processes additional important variables are those linked with the phase change. These include the enthalpy of vaporization, the boiling point, the density of the vapour and the interfacial tension. In addition to these, the microstructure and the material of the heating surface also play a role. Due to the multiplicity of variables, it is much more diﬃcult to ﬁnd equations for the calculation of heat transfer coeﬃcients than in other heat transfer problems. An explicit theory is still a long way oﬀ because the physical phenomena are too complex and have not been suﬃciently researched. The cause of this is not only that there are many inﬂuencing quantities that play a role in boiling processes, but also diﬀerent types of heat transfer depending on the ﬂow conﬁguration and superheating. These diﬀerent types of heat transfer will be considered ﬁrst, followed by an explanation of the physical fundamentals of boiling phenomena. The ﬁnal part of this section will consist of the calculation of the heat transfer.

4.2.1

The diﬀerent types of heat transfer

Depending on the type of boiling, we diﬀerentiate between evaporation, nucleate boiling and convective boiling. We will consider evaporation ﬁrst.

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

487

If a liquid on a heated wall is superheated to a temperature just above the saturation temperature, no or only a few vapour bubbles form. In a vessel ﬁlled with liquid, that is heated from below, a temperature proﬁle develops, like that schematically illustrated in Fig. 4.27. A boundary layer forms over the heated wall which has a temperature of ϑ0. The boundary layer has thickness of the order of 1 mm, with a stark temperature drop, whilst in the core of the liquid the temperature is almost constant (mean value ϑL ) over the height z. At the free surface the temperature falls, in a thin layer, to the value ϑI , that lies slightly above the saturation temperature ϑs . The diﬀerence ϑI −ϑs was ﬁrst measured by Pr¨ uger [4.42] for water at 1.01 bar to be around 0.03 K, whereas for non-polar liquids like carbon tetrachloride this values is around 0.001 K. As important as this liquid superheating at the surface is for the kinetic considerations in evaporation, it can be ignored in technical calculations. In the following, therefore, the temperature at the vapour forming surface will always be given as the saturation temperature ϑI = ϑs .

Fig. 4.27: Temperature pattern in the liquid during surface evaporation

In the thin layer adjacent to the wall the temperature drops steeply, as can be seen in Fig. 4.27. Conduction is the predominant heat transfer process in this layer. In the liquid, rising and falling convection streams provide for the transport of heat. They generate the uniform temperature ﬁeld in the core of the liquid. The two boundary layers at the top and bottom are diﬀerentiated by the fact that the free surface can move because of the vapour formation, and so in contrast to the liquid at the wall, ﬁnite velocities parallel to the surface can also appear. The vaporization at the surface acts as a heat sink, which could be imaginarily replaced by another process, for example radiation. As the vaporization takes place at the surface, we speak of “stagnant boiling”. By its nature this process belongs to the phenomena of convection in closed spaces. Heat transfer coeﬃcients from the heated surface to the liquid are formed with the driving temperature diﬀerence ϑ0 − ϑL , where ϑ0 is the wall temperature of the heated surface and ϑL is the liquid temperature. As the liquid temperature ϑL is not known in advance and, as explained above, only deviates slightly from the saturation temperature, it is sensible to form the heat transfer coeﬃcients with the temperature diﬀerence Δϑ = ϑ0 − ϑs . In stagnant boiling this law of heat transfer is valid in free ﬂow. Thus we have α = c1 Δϑ1/4 in laminar ﬂow and α = c2 Δϑ1/3 in turbulent ﬂow

488

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

over a horizontal plate. As the heat ﬂux is given by q˙ = αΔϑ, for laminar ﬂow it holds that α = c1 Δϑ1/4 or α = c1 q˙1/5 (4.73) or in turbulent ﬂow α = c2 Δϑ1/3

or α = c2 q˙1/4 .

(4.74)

If the wall temperature is raised by increasing the heat ﬂow to the wall, above a certain wall temperature vapour bubbles begin to form. Observations have shown that these bubbles only appear at certain points on the heated surface. The number of bubbles increases with the heat being fed to the surface. This type of heat transfer is known as nucleate boiling. Fig. 4.28 shows a typical temperature proﬁle over a horizontal plate from measurements by Jakob et al. [4.43] to [4.49], to whom we owe the ﬁrst fundamental investigations into this process. The motion of the bubbles at the surface does not allow exact measurement of the boundary layer. The heat transfer coeﬃcient is formed, in the same way as for stagnant boiling, with the temperature diﬀerence Δϑ = ϑ0 − ϑs . Heat transfer is much better than in stagnant boiling and is approximately proportional to the cube of the temperature diﬀerence Δϑ. If we consider that the heat ﬂux transferred is given by q˙ = α Δϑ, then in the nucleate boiling region, it is approximately valid that α = c3 Δϑ3

or α = c3 q˙3/4 .

(4.75)

If α(q) ˙ from (4.74) or (4.75) and (4.76) are graphically illustrated, two straight lines are produced, if the ordinate and abcissa have logarithmic scales. Two clearly separate areas are obtained, one for stagnant the other for nucleate boiling, as shown in Fig. 4.29, which reproduces the measured values from Jakob et al. [4.44], [4.45].

Fig. 4.28: Temperature proﬁle over a horizontal heated surface, from Jakob and Linke [4.46]. Heat ﬂux q˙ = 22 440 W/m2 , temperature of heated surface ϑ0 = 109.1 ◦ C

Fig. 4.29: Heat transfer in boiling water at 100 ◦ C on a horizontal heated surface, according to Jakob et al. [4.43], [4.45]. Curve a stagnant boiling region, curve b nucleate boiling region

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

489

In industrial apparatus boiling normally takes place in forced convection. The ﬂow behaviour is largely determined by the pressure diﬀerence along the heated surface. The vapour content increases constantly along the ﬂow path until complete vaporization sets in. Correspondingly, the decreasing amount of liquid yields various boiling phenomena, upon whose heat transfer properties the local boiling temperature is dependent. In general, a subcooled liquid enters a heating channel. The vapour bubbles formed at the wall condense back into the core of the liquid. If the core liquid is heated to the saturation temperature then nucleate boiling predominates. The heat transfer coeﬃcient will be principally determined by the heat ﬂux. In forced ﬂow it only has a slight dependence on the mass ﬂux, and in free ﬂow it is virtually independent of the mass ﬂux. The individual vapour bubbles coalesce into large bubbles, forming slug flow, as shown by Fig. 4.30. With increasing vapour content, the large bubbles grow together such that a semi-annular flow develops, and subsequently a liquid ﬁlm forms at the tube wall with vapour and liquid drops in the core. This is known as annular flow. As more heat is added to the tube the liquid ﬁlm disappears downstream, leaving a vapour containing liquid droplets, so-called spray flow, ﬂowing through the tube. Fig. 4.30 shows these ﬂow patterns in a vertical tube. More complicated ﬂow patterns exist in horizontal or inclined tubes. Bubble, slug, semi-annular and annular ﬂows represent diﬀerent forms of convective boiling. In practice annular or at very low ﬂow velocities, slug ﬂow frequently occur. Bubble ﬂow only appears at very low vapour contents and high ﬂow velocities. Increasing pressure and with that a decreasing density diﬀerence between vapour and liquid extends the bubble ﬂow region. Whilst in nucleate boiling the heat transfer coeﬃcient is chieﬂy dependent on the heat ﬂux q˙ and is barely dependent on the ﬂow velocity, curve b in Fig. 4.29, in convective boiling the heat transfer is determined by the ﬂow velocity or the mass ﬂux m, ˙ with the heat ﬂux having vitually no inﬂuence. This is shown by Fig. 4.31, in which the nucleate boiling and convective boiling regions are distinctly separate from each other. A further independent variable is the quality x∗ = M˙ G /M˙ . With increasing quality, the curves for convective boiling in Fig. 4.31 are shifted to larger heat transfer coeﬃcients α. The fundamental dependence of the heat transfer coeﬃcients on the quality is illustrated in Fig. 4.32. In regions of low quality x∗ nucleate boiling occurs and the heat transfer coeﬃcient is principally dependent on the heat ﬂux. The quality increases downstream, and with that the ﬂow velocity also increases. The heat fed into the system is mainly transferred by convection from the tube wall to the vapour-liquid ﬂow. A conversion from nucleate boiling to convective boiling occurs, as the arrow on the curves q˙1 and m ˙ 1 in Fig. 4.32 indicates. In the convective boiling region the local heat transfer coeﬃcient is practically independent of the heat ﬂux q, ˙ and depends strongly on the mass ﬂow rate and the quality. At high quality the heat transfer coeﬃcient decreases because of the low thermal conductivity of the vapour compared to that of the liquid.

490

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

Fig. 4.30: Flow patterns in a vertical, heated tube

Fig. 4.32: Trends of the heat transfer coeﬃcient for a horizontal evaporator tube

Fig. 4.31: Heat transfer coeﬃcient in nucleate and convective boiling (qualitative)

The calculation of the heat transfer coeﬃcient can be carried out using equations of the form ˙ s f (x∗ ) , α = c q˙ n m where c depends on the material properties. In the convective boiling region n ≈ 0, with s lying between 0.6 and 0.8. In nucleate boiling n is approximately 3/4 and s is around 0.1 to 0.3.

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

4.2.2

491

The formation of vapour bubbles

Heat transfer in boiling is more easily understood when we know how the vapour bubbles form on the hot surface. The following consists of a discussion of the formation and growth of vapour bubbles, with a subsequent explanation of the diﬀerent types of heat transfer. The considerations hold for the equilibrium of a vapour bubble, assumed to be spherical, Fig. 4.33, with the liquid surrounding it. Between the gaseous bubble (gas = index G) and the surrounding liquid (liquid = index L), thermal equilibrium exists (4.76) ϑG = ϑ L = ϑ . If a surface element of the spherical shell is cut out of the vapour bubble, as depicted in the right hand side of Fig. 4.33, with side lengths r dϕ, the forces σr dϕ exerted by the surface tension σ (σ is force per unit length) act upon the edges. The resultant FR of these forces is given by d2 FR = 2σr dϕ2 . The forces resulting from the gas and liquid pressure are also of inﬂuence pL (r dϕ)2 + d2 FR = pG (r dϕ)2 . From this, the condition of mechanical equilibrium follows pG = pL + 2σ/r .

(4.77)

Finally the condition for equilibrium with respect to mass exchange between the gaseous and liquid phase also holds. This leads, as was illustrated, for instance, in [4.50], to 2σ (4.78) pL = p0 − − r

Fig. 4.33: Mechanical Equilibrium between a spherical vapour bubble and the liquid surrounding it

492

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

or with (4.77) to

2σ . (4.79) − r Equation (4.78) or (4.79) is known as Thomson’s equation. It produces a relationship between the vapour pressure p0 (ϑ) at a ﬂat phase interface, the liquid pressure pL (ϑ, r) and the vapour pressure pG (ϑ, r) at the surface of a vapour bubble of radius r. These relationships are illustrated in Fig. 4.34. At a given temperature ϑ, the vapour pressure pG , corresponding to (4.79), is smaller by p G = p0 −

2σ 2σ = , Δ r − r than the vapour pressure p0 at the ﬂat phase boundary. As the surface tension σ is temperature dependent, the curves for the vapour pressure pG and the liquid pressure pL do not run exactly but only approximately parallel to the vapour pressure curve p0 at the phase interface. If, instead of stipulating the boiling temperature ϑ, the pressure p0 of a liquidvapour bubble system is given, then the liquid has to be superheated by Δϑ = ϑ − ϑS in comparison to the system with a ﬂat phase boundary, so that a vapour bubble of radius r is in equilibrium with the liquid, as Fig. 4.34 shows. p0 − pG = ΔpG =

Fig. 4.34: Vapour and liquid pressure between a liquid and a spherical vapour bubble

In addition it is clear that the required degree of superheating Δϑ = ϑ − ϑS is larger, the smaller the radius r of the vapour bubble is, so for small radii r∗ < r the

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

493

curves for the vapour pressure pG (ϑ, r∗ ) and the liquid pressure pL(ϑ, r∗ ) in Fig. 4.34 are shifted further to the right. Conversely, for a given degree of superheating Δϑ, a vapour bubble of deﬁnite radius r is in equilibrium with the superheated liquid. For the approximate calculation of the required superheating, we assume that the curves p0(ϑ) and pL(ϑ, r) in Fig. 4.34 run parallel. This gives dpL dp0 = . dϑ dϑ The diﬀerential dp0 /dϑ is the slope of the vapour pressure curve p0 (ϑ). It can be calculated from the Clausius-Clapeyron equation Δhv dp0 = . dϑ Ts ( − )

(4.80)

dpL ∼ p0 − pL ∼ 1 2σ . = = dϑ Δϑ Δϑ − r

(4.81)

On the other hand with (4.78)

From these equations, the bubble radius r is calculated as a function of the superheating Δϑ = ϑ − ϑS to be approximately r∼ =

2σTS . Δhv Δϑ

(4.82)

According to this, for a particular degree of liquid superheating Δϑ a deﬁnite bubble radius exists, at which the bubble is in equilibrium with the liquid. Bubbles whose radii are r∗ < r are in equilibrium with the liquid only if the superheating is Δϑ∗ > Δϑ, as Fig. 4.34 shows. A liquid superheated by Δϑ is too cold. Therefore bubbles that are too small will condense again. Bubbles of radius r∗ > r are in liquid that is superheated, and they can continue to grow. However, in reality the residence time of bubbles, in particular those close to the wall, is so small that equilibrium is never reached and the actual superheating of the ﬂuid is many times greater than Δϑ. A particular critical bubble radius also belongs to this actual superheating. In boiling water at 1 bar, according to (4.83), the bubble diameter is 2r ∼ = 0.155 mm, based on superheating in the core of the liquid by 0.4 K. A bubble of this size is then able to form and can then grow. A bubble of this type contains around 3 · 1020 water molecules. However it is diﬃcult for so many molecules with the high energy of vapour molecules to collect coincidentally at a certain position inside the liquid, form a bubble and then grow. This raises the question of how vapour bubbles actually form. Observations have taught us that no bubbles form in a completely pure, carefully degassed liquid, unless the liquid is extremely superheated or, for example, ionising beams are sent through it. Furthermore, over a long time, the bubbles reappear at the same place on the heated surface, with a varying frequency that can be approximated to an error function. Obviously this has something to do

494

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

with highly active centres that catalyse the transformation from unstable superheated liquid to stable vapour. These centres are the remains of gas or vapour in depressions in the surface that have not been driven out by the liquid, because even with good wetting ability it cannot completely ﬁll the ﬁne depressions on the surface. When heat is added, the gas or vapour remnants expand until a critical size is reached that corresponds to the size of a viable bubble. Then a vapour bubble can grow further as a result of the superheating of the ﬂuid, until ﬁnally the adhesion force becomes smaller than the buoyancy and dynamic forces and the bubble detaches itself from the heated surface. After the bubble breaks oﬀ, further gas or vapour remains enclosed in the depression. This will be cooled by the cold liquid ﬂowing from the centre of the ﬂuid to the wall, and then subsequently heated by the addition of heat from the wall. A new nucleus for the growth of a vapour bubble forms. These considerations explain why the surface structure is an inﬂuential quantity for heat transfer. Vapour bubbles almost always develop at particularly favourable positions on solid surfaces or on suspended particles. Therefore, it is generally heterogeneous nuclei formation that prevails. The homogeneous nuclei formation, with bubbles formed by “themselves” as a result of the natural ﬂuctuations of the molecules, plays a very minor role.

4.2.3

Mechanism of heat transfer in natural convection boiling

Current known models for heat transfer in boiling only partially describe the process and so do not lead to a complete theory. Heat transfer in nucleate boiling is very complex because several exchange mechanisms are active simultaneously. Depending on the conditions present,such as the heat ﬂux, pressure, wetting, forced convection, subcooling, etc., one or more of the mechanisms will dominate. This is probably an explanation for the fact that the theories presented up until now agree with measured values in certain regions for particular substances, but fail for other regions and materials. As shown in recent studies [4.51] to [4.56] a considerable part of the heat is transferred in a tiny ring-shaped zone underneath the bubble, Fig. 4.35. This socalled micro-zone moves outwards together with the growing bubble as a function of time t. Its width is only a fraction of one micro-meter. An enlarged view of the micro-zone is shown in Fig. 4.36. In the outer region, here called the macro-region, the vapour bubble is almost spherical. Its curvature K is approximately constant with a value K = 2/r(t), where r(t) is the time dependent bubble radius. In the micro-zone the curvature changes extremely quickly from a ﬁnite value far outside to zero near the bubble axis. There the wall is covered by a thin non-evaporating adsorbed liquid ﬁlm of zero curvature. This ﬁlm does not evaporate because of the high attractive forces

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

495

Fig. 4.35: Single bubble with surrounding liquid

between wall and liquid. In the micro-zone, located between the adsorbed ﬁlm and the macro-zone, the curvature K of the vapour-liquid interface passes through a steep maximum. For example as shown by P.Stephan and Hammer [4.51] this maximum amounts to Kmax ≈ 107 m−1 for refrigerant R114 boiling at a copper wall, superheated 5 K

Fig. 4.36: Mikro-zone of a bubble attached to the wall

496

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

above the saturation temperature of 302.63 K. In this case the curvature changes over a small radial distance of 0.1 μm from K = 0 in the adsorbed ﬁlm up to a maximum of Kmax ≈ 107 m−1 . After that it drops down, and reaches at the end of the 7 μm wide micro-zone an almost constant value of K ≈ 103 m−1 in the macro-zone. In this zone the bubble is almost spherical. The strong change in curvature provokes extreme changes of the capillary pressure σK. Here σ is the surface tension (SI-unit N/m). The steep gradient of capillary pressure induces an intense liquid ﬂow towards the interface with subsequent evaporation. Hence extreme high heat ﬂuxes are transferred in a small part of the micro-zone only 0.1 μm wide . For R114 the maximum values reached are about 1.6 · 107 W/m2 as shown in Fig. 4.37. A similar order of maximum heat ﬂuxes was found in studies of evaporation with other liquids [4.52]. The area of the circular annuli of the micro-zone covers only a small fraction of the heater surface assigned to a single bubble. In spite of this almost 60% of the total heat ﬂux is transferred in this tiny zone.

Fig. 4.37: Heat ﬂux in the micro-zone according to [4.51]

During growth the bubble is initially retained at the wall by the adhesion forces. With increasing diameter the micro-zone moves radially outward. Simultaneously the bubble size increases, and hence also the buoyancy forces. As soon as they overcome the attractive forces the bubble begins to detach from the wall. This produces a bubble shape like that in Fig. 4.38 a. A bubble neck“forms ” between the heated surface and the part of the bubble away from it. According to Mitrovi´c [4.57], the bubble breaks oﬀ when the bubble neck is completely constricted Fig. 4.38 b. The total vapour mass splits into two diﬀerent sized

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

497

Fig. 4.38: Detachment process, according to Mitrovi´c [4.57]. a Shape of the attached bubble; b constriction and break oﬀ of the bubble; c condensation of the remaining vapour and the liquid ﬂow

amounts. A small amount of vapour remains attached to the heated surface. The larger amount of vapour is found in the detached bubble. Due to the small radius of curvature at the point at the bottom of the detaching bubble a high capillary pressure forms which seeks to equalize itself, and in the process of this, provided that the bubble is not extremely small, causes the bubble to oscillate. In the same way a capillary pressure acts on the vapour remaining on the surface. As Mitrovi´c [4.57] showed with an example, this pressure can reach values of 0.4 MPa. As a result of this overpressure the vapour remaining will be partly or even completely liqueﬁed. In particular, with little superheating of the wall the remaining vapour will be condensed to a great extent. Therefore, without superheating it takes some time until the next bubble forms, whilst with suﬃcient superheating the next bubble will develop out of the remaining vapour without any waiting time. The breaking down of the capillary forces causes the peak in Fig. 4.38 b to disappear, and the bubble shape shown in Fig. 4.38 c forms with diverging streamlines underneath the bubble. In the liquid below the bubble an underpressure develops that keeps the detached bubbles close to the wall for a short time. This underpressure causes the liquid to be in a metastable state with high superheating. The superheated liquid can also serve as a nucleus for new bubbles. Therefore, in addition to heterogeneous nucleation on the depressions in the wall, homogeneous nucleation close to the wall is also possible. This, along with the liquid ﬂow, quickly removes the underpressure. These thoughts show that convection is also of inﬂuence on the growth and detachment of the bubbles. Previous results on the inﬂuence of convection are still inconsistent, as emerges from summaries, among others from [4.58]. As Genske and Stephan [4.59] stated in a theoretical study, the growth of the bubble is determined by heat conduction immediately following its formation, after that, with increasing bubble size the radial convection will be decisive. After the break

498

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

oﬀ of the bubble, heat conduction and radial and axial convection all inﬂuence the bubble growth.

4.2.4

Bubble frequency and departure diameter

The bubble formed at the wall grows by vaporization until it reaches a limiting volume when it detaches itself from the wall and rises. In slow growth this limiting volume is determined by the equilibrium of buoyancy and surface forces and the adhesion conditions at the wall. The decisive diﬀerential equation for this was ﬁrst solved numerically by Bashfort and Adams [4.60]. Based on their solution, Fritz [4.61] later showed that there is a greatest volume VA for a vapour bubble, that can be represented in the form 1/3 VA = f (β0 ) , (4.83) b3 where β0 is the contact angle between the bubble and the heated wall. The socalled Laplace constant serves as a parameter 2σ b= . (4.84) g (L − G ) If this is formed with the saturation values and of the densities, then, for example, for water at 100 ◦ C the value b = 3.54 mm is obtained, and for the refrigerant R134a at 25 ◦ C b = 1.18 mm. Some values for air bubbles in a liquid are presented in Table 4.1. Eq. (4.83) has been conﬁrmed by Fritz and Ende [4.62] Table 4.1: Laplace constant b for air bubbles in liquids at 20 ◦ C

b in mm

Water

Ethanol

Mercury

3.82

2.26

2.69

and by Kabanow and Frumkin [4.63] from the evaluation of recordings of ﬁlms, Fig. 4.39. From (4.83), for a spherical bubble dA = (6VA /π)1/3 , the following is obtained for the departure diameter 2σ (4.85) dA = 0.851 β0 g (L − G ) with the contact angle β0 in radians. According to Fritz [4.61] the contact angles of vapour bubbles in water at atmospheric pressure lie between 40◦ and 45◦ , and those in refrigerants of halogenated hydrocarbons at around 35◦ . Actual

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

499

Fig. 4.39: Detachment volume VA of vapour and gas bubbles over a horizontal heated surface, according to Fritz and Ende [4.62]. b Laplace constant

departure diameters deviate somewhat from those according to (4.85), and are also dependent on the shape of the depressions [4.64] and the superheating of the wall. Equations for the calculation of the frequency f of vapour bubbles of departure diameter dA , originally started with the assumption that f dA = const, where the constants for water and carbon tetrachloride were found to be 100 mm/s [4.66]. The constants were later expressed in terms of the physical properties of the boiling liquid, 1/4 gσ ( − ) f dA = 0.59 , 2 whilst other authors, [4.67] to [4.69], suggested equations of the form f dnA = const with n = 1/2. More accurate investigations, [4.64], have, however, shown that the exponent n is not constant but assumes values between 0.5 and 2. Under the assumption that at the moment of detachment the bubbles do not accelerate and their velocity is the same as their rising velocity in the ﬂuid, Malenkov [4.71] found the following expression for the frequency 1/2 2σ 1 dA g ( − ) + f= , (4.86) dA π 2( + ) dA ( + ) which can be simpliﬁed for regions well below the critical pressure, with , to 1/2 g 1/2 4σ f = 1/2 √ . (4.87) 1+ 2 dA g dA π 2 These equations are only valid if the heat ﬂux is so small that the bubbles do not noticeably inﬂuence each other. In any other case, the frequency increases by a heat ﬂux dependent factor of q˙ 1 + , Δhv w

500

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

where

w=

2σ dA g ( − ) + 2( + ) dA ( + )

1/2

is a velocity. The frequency is obtained to be q˙ 1 1 + w , f= dA π Δhv w

(4.88)

an equation in which the velocity w can be simpliﬁed, if . In the limiting case of suﬃciently small heat ﬂux, this relationship transforms into the equation given above for single bubbles. These equations from Malenkov have been checked by numerous measurements by diﬀerent authors and have shown good agreement. As can be seen in (4.88), for large departure diameters, the second term in the 1/2 square brackets is small, then we have f dA = const. If, however the departure diameter is suﬃciently small the second sum in the square brackets will be large, 3/2 giving f dA = const. In a middle region of the departure diameter the expression in the square brackets is independent of the departure diameter, and with that f dA = const. The equations contain the relationships, ascertained by diﬀerent authors, between the frequency and the departure diameter. According to (4.88) the bubble frequency increases with heat ﬂux. The size of the nucleation site is also deﬁnitely of inﬂuence. Nucleation sites of small opening diameters release bubbles at a higher frequency than nucleation sites with larger opening diameters. The equations above do not take this eﬀect into account, but reproduce mean values over nucleation sites of diﬀerent sizes. Likewise, the inﬂuence of subcooling is also not considered. Increased subcooling produces bubbles less frequently because the bubble growth is hindered by condensation.

4.2.5

Boiling in free ﬂow. The Nukijama curve

We will now consider boiling in free ﬂow, and in this we will assume that the dimensions of the vessel in which the vapour is present are large in comparison to the vapour bubbles. The ﬂow is a result of the buoyancy of the generated bubbles and of the density diﬀerences. For simpliﬁcation we speak of pool boiling. The two phase ﬂow in a narrow evaporator tube, even when it is caused by the buoyancy of the vapour bubbles in a horizontal tube, shall not be investigated. As was already explained in section 4.2.1, at small superheating of the wall “stagnant boiling” develops. Heat is only transferred by free convection, curve a in Fig. 4.29. Nucleate boiling sets in only after a certain degree of superheating of the wall compared to the boiling temperature. We will look at the more frequent case where the liquid is at the saturation temperature. The driving temperature diﬀerence for heat transfer is ϑ0 − ϑs = Δϑ between the wall and the saturation temperature. Jakob and Linke [4.72] were the ﬁrst to discover that the heat

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

501

ﬂux transferred in fully developed nucleate boiling, curve b in Fig. 4.29, can be described by simple empirical equations of the form q˙ = c Δϑm .

(4.89)

If the heat transfer coeﬃcient is deﬁned by α = q/Δϑ ˙ ,

(4.90)

α = c q˙n ,

(4.91)

then (4.89) can also be written as

with c = (c )1/m and n = (m − 1)/m. In this equation, as many measurements show, the quantity n and therefore also m principally depend on the type of boiling liquid, but also on the material, structure and shape of the heated surface and the pressure. In general 0.6 < n < 0.8 . Lower values n ≈ 0.5 have only been found for substances with low boiling points, such as helium. The quanitity c is strongly dependent on the material properties of the boiling liquid and the structure of the heating surface. If, for example, c is known for a particular liquid that boils at a given pressure on a ﬂat, polished, steel tube, then the heat transfer coeﬃcient calculated with this quantity may not be used if the same liquid was boiling on a rough steel tube or a copper tube.

Fig. 4.40: (q, ˙ Δϑ) diagram for boiling water

Equation (4.89) or (4.91) is only valid in regions of intensive nucleate boiling. However, as Nukijama [4.73] was the ﬁrst to show there are further regions of vaporization. Fig. 4.40 illustrates the individual regions that appear in boiling water at atmospheric pressure and in free ﬂow. The heat ﬂux q˙ is plotted against the temperature diﬀerence Δϑ = ϑ0 − ϑs . The rising left hand branch of the curve indicates the region of fully developed nucleate boiling. The heat ﬂux increases with rising temperature. Once a maximum has been reached the transferred heat

502

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

ﬂux decreases again despite the rising temperature. This falling region of the “boiling line” is known as partial ﬁlm boiling, because the heated surface is partly covered by vapour. A minimum heat ﬂux is passed and once again the heat ﬂux starts to increase with the wall temperature. This region on the right hand end of the boiling line is designated as film boiling, because there the heated surface is completely covered by a vapour ﬁlm. The N -shaped curve, also called the Nukijama curve, which at ﬁrst glance seems rather strange, is physically plausible: With increasing wall temperature more vapour bubbles form at the heated wall, which set the liquid close to the wall into motion. The result of this is that bubble formation promotes heat transfer from the wall to the liquid. Because the vapour insulates the wall from the liquid, the heat transfer will be hindered the greater the amount of vapour present. It is easy to imagine that with increasing wall temperature the insulating eﬀect of the vapour dominates and so despite the rising temperature the heat ﬂux decreases. Once a suﬃciently high wall temperature has been attained the heat ﬂux will begin to increase again, as the thickness of the vapour ﬁlm only increases slightly with the wall temperature. The maximum on the boiling line is frequently called the critical or maximum heat flux. Useful, but less appropriate designations are burnout or DNB (departure from nucleate boiling).

4.2.6

Stability during boiling in free ﬂow

If the wall temperature of the heated surface is raised above the value associated with the maximum heat ﬂux, the wall is suddenly covered by a vapour ﬁlm. Within fractions of a second the temperature of the wall sharply increases and can even reach the melting temperature of the wall. An example of this is illustrated in Figs. 4.41 and 4.42. Fig. 4.41 shows nucleate boiling of the refrigerant R11 on a horizontal copper tube that has been electrically heated with a heat ﬂux of around 2·105 W/m2 . This heat ﬂux is only slightly less than the maximum. After a minor increase in the heat ﬂux, the temperature rises so far that the tube melts through. This is clearly recognisable in parts of the tube shown in Fig. 4.42. In order to prevent this phenomenon, to be avoided above all in nuclear reactors, a suﬃciently large “safety margin” should be maintained from the maximum heat ﬂux. Obviously not all of the states along the boiling line illustrated in Fig. 4.40 are stable, rather under certain conditions instabilities can occur. In the following we will explain these instability phenomena. The boiling line, like that in Fig. 4.40, represents all pairs of values (q, ˙ Δϑ) that are possible in the steady-state operation of a boiler. Of these pairs of values only quite speciﬁc ones come into question as operating points of the evaporator. Similarly to the way the operating point of a compressor is determined by the compressor and tube operating lines, the operating point of a boiler is determined by the boiling

This ﬁgure will be printed b/w

503

Fig. 4.41: Electrically heated copper tube immediately before the maximum heat ﬂux is reached. Heat ﬂux q˙max = 2.2 · 105 W/m2 . Boiling R11, p = 0.1 MPa

This ﬁgure will be printed b/w

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

Fig. 4.42: Electrically heated tube from Fig. 4.38 at the moment of melting (burnout)

curve and the operating line of the boiler. When the material properties of the heated surface are presumed to be independent of temperature, the operating line of the boiler is a straight line in a (q, ˙ Δϑ)-diagram. This can be explained with the example of a ﬂat wall, Fig. 4.43. Using the notation in Fig. 4.43, the heat ﬂux transferred from the wall is q˙ =

1 (ϑL − ϑ0 ) RW

with the thermal resistance RW =

1 s + , αi λ

(4.92)

(4.93)

504

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

where αi is the heat transfer coeﬃcient between the heating ﬂuid and the wall, s is the wall thickness and λ is the thermal conductivity of the wall. (4.92) can also be written as 1 −1 (ϑ0 − ϑs ) + (ϑL − ϑs ) . (4.94) q˙ = RW RW If additional internal energy is generated in the wall, from nuclear ﬁssion or

Fig. 4.43: Heat transfer in a boiling liquid

electrical dissipation, then the heat ﬂux released increases by q˙0 , and we obtain q˙ =

1 −1 (ϑ0 − ϑs ) + (ϑL − ϑs ) + q˙0 . RW RW

(4.95)

The operating line being sought is given by this equation. Its graphical presentation is a straight line in a (q, ˙ Δϑ)-diagram. All pairs of values (q, ˙ Δϑ) that are possible in the steady-state operation of the evaporator have to lie along this line. As (4.95) corresponds, in terms of its structure, to Ohm’s law, the operating line is called the “resistance line”. Due to its negative slope −1/RW , the heat ﬂux released by the heated surface decreases with rising wall temperature ϑ0 . This surprising result is understandable if we consider that with increasing wall temperature ϑ0 , the diﬀerence between wall temperature ϑ0 and ﬂuid temperature ϑL becomes smaller, and so the heat ﬂux decreases.

Fig. 4.44: Operating point of a boiler

The operating point of the boiler is the point at which the boiling chracteristic and resistance lines meet. As Fig. 4.44 shows, the two curves can have one intersection and one contact point or three intersection points in common. These are the possible operating points of the evaporator. The stability consideration [4.74], which will not be derived here, shows that the operating point is only stable if the

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

505

gradient of the boiling characteristic at that point is greater than the gradient of the resistance line. The following statement for the N -shaped curve has the same meaning: When three intersection points exist only the two outer ones are stable whilst the middle point characterises an unstable state. If only one intersection point occurs this is always stable. These explanations make the so-called burnout phenomenon easier to understand. If the resistance line for nuclear energy generation or electrical resistance heating is drawn in a (q, ˙ ϑ)-diagram the boiling characteristic and resistance lines have three intersection points close to the maximum in common, Fig. 4.45, of which points 1 and 2 are very close to each other. A small disturbance is suﬃcient to transform the system from the stable state 1

Fig. 4.45: Stability at maximum heat ﬂux

into the unstable state 2. Then because of the inertia of the system it will move further to point 3 where a new stable state is attained. In most systems, this new steady-state is associated with a wall temperature that is larger than the melting temperature of the heated surface, so it will melt before a stable state is reached. In order to prevent this somewhat undesirable event, the resistance line has to be chosen so steep such that it does not intersect the boiling characteristic a second time near the maximum. This procedure is clearly illustrated by curve a in Fig. 4.45. A steep resistance line is yielded, in accordance with (4.93) and (4.94), if αi is chosen to be large and the thermal resistance of the wall is small. This also allows a stable operating point at the maximum heat ﬂux to be realised.

4.2.7

Calculation of heat transfer coeﬃcients for boiling in free ﬂow

Current known models for heat transfer in boiling only partially describe the process and so do not lead to a complete theory. Obviously, heat transfer in nucleate boiling is so complex that several exchange mechanisms are active simultaneously. Depending on the conditions present, the heat ﬂux, pressure, wetting, forced convection, subcooling, etc., one or more of the mechanisms will dominate. This is probably a good explanation for the fact that the theories presented up until now agree with measured values in certain regions for particular substances, but fail for other regions and materials.

506

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

Basically, it has been ascertained that the current models contain one or more of the following mechanisms for heat transfer: 1. Microconvection in the boundary layer adjacent to the wall as a result of the rapid growth of the vapour bubble and its collapse in the subcooled liquid. 2. Displacement of hot liquid from the wall by the growing and detaching vapour bubbles, and the back-ﬂow of cold liquid from the core to the wall. 3. Transient heat conduction to the liquid transported in the wake of a bubble. 4. Transient heat conduction in the liquid adjacent to the wall during the growth of a bubble in its vicinity. 5. Vapour formation from the thin, superheated liquid layer under the growing bubble. If the core liquid is subcooled then vapour will simultaneously condense at the top of the bubble. It is not uncommon for the heat transfer coeﬃcients calculated according to the diﬀerent equations, to deviate by up to a factor of 2 from the experimental values. However these deviations cannot be purely traced back to shortcomings in the theory, but can also be partly explained by experimental errors and inaccurate material property data. Moreover, the departure diameter of the bubbles, the contact angle and the bubble frequency at ﬁxed external conditions are not, as is often assumed, constant but are subject to statistical ﬂuctuations. It is not yet clear how these ﬂuctuations have to be taken into consideration in the theory. It is also disadvantageous that, with a few exceptions, in the equations the structure of the heating surface is disregarded, although it has been known for some time that heat transfer in nucleate boiling is noticeably better on rough than on smooth surfaces. In order to ﬁnd an equation with a wide application range, it is expedient to combine the decisive properties for heat transfer into dimensionless groups. For the general law of heat transfer it is advisable to choose an exponential equation in these quantities, because equations of this nature have proven themselves for the representation of heat transfer. Regression analysis represents an eﬀective tool for establishing a relationship between the Nusselt number and the other dimensionless variables. This analysis allows us to decide which of the characteristic quantities are important in heat transfer and which are less meaningful. Stephan and Abdelsalam [4.75] have critically examined around 5000 known data for heat transfer in nucleate boiling and established empirical correlations using this method. Regression analysis showed that some dimensionless quantities are important for some substances, but are meaningless for others. The data could best be reproduced when the substances were split into four groups (hydrocarbons, cryogenic ﬂuids, refrigerants and water) and a diﬀerent set of dimensionless quantities were used for each of these groups. In addition, an equation valid for all substances has been derived, although it is less accurate than the equations for the particular substance groups named above. As most experiments have been carried out near to atmospheric pressure,

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

507

which for organic liquids corresponds to an approximate, normalised boiling pressure of p/pcr = 0.03, the accuracy of these correlations can be increased if their validity is restricted to pressures close to ambient pressure. Such a relationship has been established by Stephan and Preußer [4.76]. It reads: 0.674 0.156 0.371 2 0.350 Δhv d2A a q˙ dA −0.162 (P r ) . N u = 0.0871 λ Ts a2 σ dA (4.96) The quantities with relate to the saturated boiling liquid, and those with relate to the saturated vapour. The Nusselt number is deﬁned by N u = αdA /λ . The departure diameter dA is given by (4.87), in which L = and G = have to be substituted. For the contact angle β0 in water π/4 rad = 45◦ , in cryogenic liquids 0.01745 rad = 1◦ and for other liquids 0.611rad = 35◦ have to be used. Measurements for water in the region of fully developed nucleate boiling with heat ﬂuxes between 104 W/m2 < q˙ < 106 W/m2 and boiling pressures between 0.5 bar < p < 20 bar can, according to investigations by Fritz [4.77], be reproduced well by the simple empirical equation α = 1.95 q˙0.72 p0.24 , (4.97) where α is in W/m2 K, q˙ in W/m2 and p in bar. From (4.96), for a given heat ﬂux q˙0, the heat transfer coeﬃcients α0 can be obtained, in accordance with the validity of the equation only in the vicinity of atmospheric pressure. If a pair of values α0 , q˙0 have been found for a moderate reference pressure p0 , then, following a suggestion by Danilowa [4.78], modiﬁed by Gorenﬂo [4.79], from n q˙ α + = CW F (p ) , (4.98) α0 q˙0 where F (p+ = p/pcr) is a pressure function, the heat transfer coeﬃcients at other pressures can be calculated. Herein is 0.133 1/2 b Ra CW = Ra0 b0 with Ra as mean roughness of the heating surface, deﬁned by the German norm DIN 4762/01.89. We have 0.1 μm ≤ Ra ≤ 5 μm √ for technical surfaces. Ra0 = 0.4 μm is a reference roughness. The value b = λc is the thermal penetration √ coeﬃcient of the heater, eq. (2.128), b0 = λ0 0 c0 that of copper. According to Gorenﬂo [4.79] we have for the low boiling substances N2 , O2 , Ar, He, H2 : 1 + +0.27 F (p ) = 1.2 p p+ + 2.5 + (4.99) 1 − p+

508

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

for water

F (p+) = 1.73 p+0.27 + 6.1 +

0.68 1 − p+2

p+2 ,

(4.100)

and for organic ﬂuids +

+0.2

F (p ) = 0.7 p

+ 4+

1.4 1 − p+

p+ .

(4.101)

Equations (4.98) was established for a heat ﬂux q˙0 = 20 000 W/m2 . The reference pressure p0 is chosen such that, for the normalised pressure p+ 0 = 0.1, ) = 1. Correspondingly α , q ˙ in (4.98) is a pair of values the function will be F (p+ 0 0 0 = 0.1. belonging to the normalised pressure p+ 0 In order to determine them it is advisable to calculate ﬁrst the heat transfer coeﬃcient α (q˙0 = 20000W/m2 , p+ = 0.03) from (4.96). With (4.98) follows then with q˙ = q˙0 the heat transfer coeﬃcient α0. Its value is also tabulated for many substances in [4.79]. Numerous experiments have yielded that the exponent n of the heat ﬂux in (4.98) is not constant, but decreases with rising pressure. According to Gorenﬂo [4.79], for the low boiling substances N2 , O2 , Ar, He, H2 , it is n = 0.9 − 0.3 p+0.3 .

(4.102)

n = 0.9 − 0.3 p+0.15 ,

(4.103)

n = 0.9 − 0.3 p+0.3 .

(4.104)

For water it is and for organic liquids For water at a boiling pressure of 1 bar corresponding to p+ 2 = 0.004532, it follows = 0.1, and n = 0.61 for p+ that n = 0.77, we have n = 0.69 for p+ 0 1 = 0.8. 2 With the data for water, α0 = 5 580 W/m K, q˙0 = 20 000 W/m 2 at p+ 0 = 0.1, the following empirical equation can be reproduced from (4.98) 0.9−0.3 p+0.15 q˙ α + , = CW F (p ) 5 580 W/m2 K 20 000 W/m2

(4.105)

where F (p+ ) is given by (4.100). This equation is valid in the fully developed nucleate boiling region and at normalised boiling pressures of 10−4 ≤ p+ ≤ 0.9 , which correspond to boiling pressures of 0.0221 bar ≤ p ≤ 199 bar . It extends over a wider range of pressures than the simple equation (4.97) by Fritz and agrees well with this equation within its range of validity.

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

4.2.8

509

Some empirical equations for heat transfer during nucleate boiling in free ﬂow

In the following the equations introduced previously for heat transfer in nucleate boiling in free ﬂow are summarised and supplemented by further equations. 1. Nucleate boiling of water in free ﬂow. According to (4.97) it holds for 0.5 bar < p < 20 bar that α = 1.95 q˙0.72 p0.24 with α in W/m2 K, q˙ in W/m2 and p in bar, and from (4.105), for 0.0221 bar ≤ p ≤ 199 bar, it is also valid that 0.9−0.3 p+0.15 α q˙ + = CW F (p ) 5 580 W/m2 20 000 W/m2 with

and

p 0.68 + +0.27 F p = = 1.73 p p+2 + 6.1 + pcr 1 − p+2

0.133 1/2 b Ra . CW = Ra0 b0 Ra is the mean surface roughness of the heater, which for technical surfaces is in√the range 0.1 μm ≤ Ra ≤ 5 μm, Ra0 = 0.4 μm a reference roughness. b = √λc is the thermal penetration coeﬃcient of the heater, eq. (2.128), b0 = λ0 0 c0 that of copper.

2. Nucleate boiling, general equation. For pressures close to atmospheric, according to (4.96), it holds that N u = α dA λ 0.674 0.156 0.371 2 0.350 q˙ dA Δhv d2A a −0.162 (P r ) = 0.0871 λ Ts a2 σ dA with the departure diameter from (4.85): dA = 0.851 β0

2σ . g (L − G )

The contact angle β0, in radians, for water lies between 0.22π (=40◦ ) and 0.25π (=45◦ ), and for the halogenated hydrocarbons used as refrigerants it is around 0.194π (=35◦ ). For other pressures, α0 for the reference heat ﬂux q˙0 = 20 000 W/m2 at a reference pressure p0 close to the ambient

510

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

pressure, is ﬁrst calculated from the equation above. The desired heat transfer coeﬃcient α at pressure p and heat ﬂux q˙ is obtained from (4.98) n q˙ α = CW F (p+) α0 q˙0 with CW from no. 1. For the low boiling substances N2 , O2 , Ar, He, H2 we have 1 + +0.27 p+ . + 2.5 + F (p ) = 1.2 p 1 − p+ and n = 0.9 − 0.3p+0.3 for water

F (p+ ) = 1.73 p+0.27 + 6.1 +

0.68 1 − p+2

p+2

and n = 0.9 − 0.3p+0.15 and for organic ﬂuids +

F (p ) = 0.7 p

+0.2

+ 4+

1.4 1 − p+

p+

and n = 0.9 − 0.3 p+0.15 . 3. Nucleate boiling on horizontal copper tubes. According to Gorenﬂo [4.80] √ F (p+ / ϕ) 0.1H/t1 q˙ nf α = . · 5 √ α0 q˙0 F (p+ 0 / ϕ) In which, α0 is the heat transfer coeﬃcient at pressure p0 and reference heat ﬂux q˙0 = 20 000 W/m2 calculated from the equation given in 2 for a ﬂat √ tube. F (p+/ ϕ) is obtained from the function F (p+ ) in 2, when in place √ of p+ = p/pcr the quantity p+ / ϕ is used with the area ratio ϕ = Af /A. Af is the surface area of the ﬁnned tube, A that of a ﬂat tube of the same core diameter as the ﬁnned tube. It is nf = n − 0.1 H/t1 . n is the exponent for the heat ﬂux given in 2. H is the height of the ﬁn, t1 is the internal ﬁn spacing, see Fig. 4.46.

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

511

Fig. 4.46: Dimensions of a ﬁnned tube

4. Nucleate boiling in a horizontal bank of smooth or ﬁnned tubes. Heat transfer coeﬃcients in boiling on the outside of smooth or ﬁnned tubes in a bundle are greater than those for an individual tube. The heat transfer is improved by the oncoming ﬂow at the lowest tube row. In the tubes themselves the ascending vapour bubbles produce better convection. The inﬂuence of convection on the total heat transfer is clearly noticeable, especially if the heat ﬂux is not too large. As a result of this the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient αm of the bundle is signiﬁcantly larger than that of a single tube. According to [4.79] it holds that 1 αm =1+ , α1 2 + q˙ ϕ/(1 000 W/m2 ) where α1 is the heat transfer coeﬃcient of the lowest tube row. The equation is equally valid for smooth and ﬁnned tubes in the range 1 000W/m2 ≤ q˙ ϕ ≤ 20 000W/m2 and for pressures close to ambient. The heat ﬂux q˙ is related to the total external surface area of the tube. The quantity ϕ is the area ratio for a ﬁnned tube; for a smooth tube, we have ϕ = 1. The heat transfer coeﬃcients α1 at the bottom row of tubes are obtained, according to a suggestion by Slipˇcevi´c [4.81], from the heat transfer coeﬃcients αB for nucleate boiling on a single tube, see No. 2, and the heat transfer coeﬃcients αC for free ﬂow without bubble formation, see 3.9.3 No. 3, also for a single tube, according to α1 = αB + f αK , where f is a factor, which depends on the magnitude of the inlet ﬂow velocity. For small bundles f is around 0.5, whilst for large bundles f = 1. 5. Maximum heat ﬂux. According to Kutateladze [4.82] and Zuber [4.83], it holds that 1/4 , q˙max = KΔhv σ ( − )g where K is a constant to be found by experimentation, that lies between 0.13 and 0.16. A mean value is K = 0.145.

512

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

6. Film boiling. In ﬁlm boiling, the inﬂuence of radiation on the heat transfer cannot be neglected because of the high wall temperature. According to [4.78], the mean heat transfer coeﬃcient αm in ﬁlm boiling is given by αm 1 αR 1 =1+ 4+ αmG 5 αmG 1 + 3αmG /αR with αmG

2 = 3

and αR =

G (L − G )g Δhv λ3G 1 ηG Δϑ H

1/4

σS T04 − Ts4 . 1 1 ϑ − ϑs + −1 0 ε0 εL

H is the height of the plate or H = dπ/2 for horizontal tubes, σS = 5.67 · 10−8 W/m2 K4 is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, cf. section 1.1.5, and 5.2.3, ε0 is the emissivity of the wall, εL is the emissivity of the liquid surface.

Example 4.4: In a saucepan 1 l of water at atmospheric pressure 0.1013 MPa is to be boiled on an electric cooker. The power of the hotplate of the electric cooker is Q˙ = 3 kW, its diameter is the same as that of the saucepan, namely 0.3 m. a) How long does it take until the water starts to boil, if the initial temperature is 20 ◦ C? The heat losses to the surroundings amount to 30 % of the heat input. b) What is the temperature at the bottom of the saucepan when the water begins to boil? c) How long does it take for all the water to be vaporized? d) Calculate the maximum heat ﬂux. The following data are given: saturation temperature ϑs = 100 ◦ C at a pressure of 0.1013 MPa, density of the liquid L = 958.1 kg/m3 , speciﬁc heat capacity of the liquid cpL = 4.216 kJ/kgK, vapour density = 0.5974 kg/m3 , surface tension σ = 58.92 · 10−3 N/m, enthalpy of vaporization Δhv =2257.3 kJ/kg. a) Until the boiling point is reached the following amount of heat has to be fed to the water Q = M cpL Δϑ = L V cpL Δϑ = 958.1 kg/m3 · 10−3 m3 · 4.216 kJ/kgK · 80 K = 323 kJ . We have Q˙ Δt0 = Q, i.e. the time taken to reach the boiling temperature is Δt0 =

323 kJ Q = = 154 s = 2.56 min . 3 kW · 0.7 Q˙

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

513

b) According to (4.97) the heat transfer coeﬃcient in boiling in obtained as α = 1.95 q˙ 0.72 p0.24

with q˙ =

Q˙ 0.7 · 3 kW = = 2.971 · 104 W/m2 . A 0.32 m2 · π/4

So α = 1.95 · (2.971 · 104 )0.72 · (1.013)0.24 W/m2 K = 3250 W/m2 K and Δϑ =

q˙ 2.971 · 104 W/m2 = = 9.1 K . α 3250 W/m2 K

The temperature at the bottom of the pan is ϑ0 = ϑs + Δϑ = 100 ◦ C + 9.1 ◦ C = 109.1 ◦ C. c) 70 % of the heat released is fed to the water. In order to completely vaporize the mass M = L V , the following amount of heat is required Q = L V Δhv = 958.1kg/m · 10−3 m3 2257.3kJ/kg = 2163 kJ . 3

The time required for this is Δt = Q/Q˙ =

2163 kJ = 1 030 s = 17.2 min . 0.7 · 3 kW

d) The maximum heat ﬂux is found, using 4.2.8, No. 5, to be q˙max

= 0.145 Δhv

√ 1/4 [σ ( − ) g]

= 0.145 · 2.2573 · 106 J/kg · 0.5974 kg/m3 1/4 · 58.92 · 10−3 N/m · (958.1 − 0.5974) kg/m3 · 9.81 m/s2 q˙max

4.2.9

= 1.23 · 106 W/m2 .

Two-phase ﬂow

In boiling in free ﬂow the ﬂow pattern and heat transfer are determined by the diﬀerence in the hot surface and boiling temperatures, as well as by the properties of the ﬂuid and the heating wall. Meanwhile in boiling in forced ﬂow the velocity of the vapour and liquid phases and the distribution of the phases are additional factors that inﬂuence the ﬂow patterns and heat transfer. As has already been discussed in section 4.2.1, the heat transfer coeﬃcient can no longer be represented by a simple empirical correlation of the form α = c q˙n , but the mass ﬂux m ˙ and the quality x∗ come into play as inﬂuencing quantities, such that empirical heat transfer relationships of the form α = c q˙n m ˙ s f (x∗) are used. The form of these relationships is signiﬁcantly determined by the ﬂow pattern, which will be discussed in the following section.

514

4.2.9.1

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

The diﬀerent ﬂow patterns

The numerous forms of two-phase ﬂow can be divided into certain basic types, between which transition and mixed states are possible. The basic types of ﬂow pattern in upward two-phase flow in a vertical, unheated tube are shown in Fig. 4.47.

Fig. 4.47: Flow types in a vertical, unheated tube with upward ﬂow. a bubble ﬂow; b plug ﬂow; c churn ﬂow; d wispy-annular ﬂow; e annular ﬂow; f spray or drop ﬂow

In bubble flow, Fig. 4.47 a, the gas or vapour phase is uniformly dispersed in the continuous liquid phase. Only very small bubbles are spherical. The larger ones are oblate. This type of ﬂow pattern occurs when the gas fraction is small. In plug flow, Fig. 4.47 b, large bubbles (plugs) almost ﬁll the entire tube cross section. Between the plugs, the liquid is interspersed with small bubbles. At high mass ﬂuxes the bubble structure increasingly disintegrates. This produces churn flow, Fig. 4.47 c. It consists more or less of large irregular gas or vapour fragments and has a very unstable character. This type of ﬂow develops especially in tubes with large diameters and at high pressure. The wispy-annular flow, Fig. 4.47 d, consists of a relatively thick liquid ﬁlm at the wall, even though the liquid fraction in the vapour or gas core of the ﬂow is still large. The ﬁlm is interspersed with small bubbles, and the liquid phase in the core ﬂow is mainly made up of large drops that sometimes coalesce into liquid strands. This type of ﬂow pattern is normally observed when the mass ﬂux is large. A pattern that frequently appears is annular flow, Fig. 4.47 e. It is characterised by the fact that the main portion of the liquid mass is at the wall and the gas or vapour phase, that is interspersed with drops, ﬂows in the core of the tube at a signiﬁcantly higher velocity. As a result of evaporation and especially at high velocities of vapour or gas, the liquid ﬁlm at the wall disintegrates and a spray or drop flow is formed, Fig. 4.47 f. This occurs particularly in evaporation at high pressure.

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

515

All these two-phase ﬂow patterns are not only observed in cylindrical tubes, but also in channels with other cross sections, as long as they do not deviate completely from the circular shape, for example a channel with a very ﬂat, oblate cross section. All these ﬂow types appear more or less in a series one after the other during the evaporation of a liquid in a vertical tube, as already illustrated in Fig. 4.30. The structure of a non-adiabatic vapour-liquid ﬂow normally diﬀers from that of an adiabatic two-phase ﬂow, even when the local ﬂow parameters, like the mass ﬂux, quality, etc. agree with each other. The cause of this are the deviations from thermodynamic equilibrium created by the radial temperature diﬀerences, as well as the deviations from hydrodynamic equilibrium. Processes that lead to a change in the ﬂow pattern, such as bubbles coalescing, the dragging of liquid drops in fast ﬂowing vapour, the collapse of drops, and the like, all take time. Therefore, the quicker the evaporation takes place, the further the ﬂow is away from hydrodynamic equilibrium. This means that certain ﬂow patterns are more pronounced in heated than in unheated tubes, and in contrast to this some may possibly not appear at all. The force of gravity causes the liquid in a horizontal, unheated tube or channel, to ﬂow mainly in the lower section and the vapour in the upper part of the tube. The smaller the inertia forces are in comparison to the gravitational forces, the greater the diﬀerence between the ﬂow in horizontal and vertical tubes. Thus, at low velocities ﬂow patterns develop in horizontal tubes that are never seen in vertical tubes. Fig. 4.48 shows the characteristic patterns of two-phase ﬂow in a horizontal tube.

Fig. 4.48: Flow patterns in a horizontal, unheated tube a bubble ﬂow; b plug ﬂow; c stratiﬁed ﬂow; d wavy ﬂow; e slug ﬂow; f annular ﬂow; g spray or drop ﬂow

The vapour bubbles collect in the upper part of the tube due to buoyancy forces, this is known as bubble flow, Fig. 4.48 a. They can then grow into plugs, producing plug flow, Fig. 4.48 b.

516

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

At low velocities the two phases are completely separate. This is called stratified flow, Fig. 4.48 c. If the gas or vapour velocity increases then waves will form at the surface of the liquid, wavy flow, Fig. 4.48 d. The wave peaks will get larger and eventually wet the upper channel wall in an irregular sequence, slug flow, Fig. 4.48 e. At even higher velocities an annular flow develops, Fig. 4.48 f, where the thickness of the ﬁlm in the top half of the tube is generally smaller than that in the lower part of the tube. With a further increase in the vapour velocity this is transformed into spray flow, Fig. 4.48 g. In a horizontal, heated tube these ﬂow patterns appear one after the other. For the same reasons as in a vertical evaporator tube, thermodynamic equilibrium is not achieved because of the radial temperature proﬁle. Fig. 4.49 shows the diﬀerent ﬂow patterns in a horizontal evaporator tube, under the assumption that the liquid enters the tube at a suﬃciently low velocity, below 1 m/s. It is clear

Fig. 4.49: Flow patterns in horizontal evaporator tube according to Collier [4.85]

here, that in slug ﬂow the upper wall of the tube alternates between being dry and wetted. In the region of annular ﬂow, the upper wall of the tube drys out further downstream. The higher the mass ﬂux, the more symmetrical the phase distribution, which approaches that in a vertical evaporator tube. 4.2.9.2

Flow maps

As the diﬀerent ﬂow regimes are determined by the forces between the two phases, above all by the inertia and gravitational forces, it is appropriate to mark the dependence of the boundaries between the diﬀerent ﬂow patterns on these forces in diagrams, so-called ﬂow maps. This type of ﬂow map was ﬁrst presented by Baker [4.86]. Therefore, we also speak of Baker-diagrams. These diagrams only provide a rough orientation because the decisive forces in the diﬀerent ﬂow regions

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

517

are not known with suﬃcient certainty. In particular, for a two-phase ﬂow with heat input, large uncertainty has to be reckoned with, as most ﬂow maps have been developed for adiabatic ﬂows. In addition to this, the transition regions between the diﬀerent ﬂow regimes are not very clear, a deﬁnite boundary with a marked transition does not exist.

Fig. 4.50: Flow pattern diagram for vertical, two-phase ﬂow according to Hewitt and Roberts [4.87]

Fig. 4.50 is an example of one of these ﬂow maps. It was developed by Hewitt and Roberts [4.87] from observations of the ﬂow in an air-water mixture at ambient pressure and in water-steam mixtures at high pressure in vertical tubes of 2 diameters between 10 and 30 mm. The momentum ﬂuxes G wG of the vapour and 2 L wL of the liquid are plotted on the ordinates. These have the same dimensions as pressure and are formed with the apparent gas and liquid velocities, that would appear if each of the two phases ﬁlled the entire cross section, wG = x∗ m/ ˙ G

and wL = (1 − x∗) m/ ˙ L .

A corresponding ﬂow map for horizontal and inclined tubes has been developed by Taitel and Dukler [4.88]. 4.2.9.3

Some basic terms and deﬁnitions

Some basic terms and deﬁnitions from two-phase ﬂow theory are required for the description of heat transfer in boiling. For this we will consider the section of a channel shown in Fig. 4.51, in which the gas and liquid are ﬂowing. An annular

518

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

Fig. 4.51: Two-phase ﬂow in a heated channel

ﬂow is shown in the picture for the sake of simplicity, but the following terms are also valid for the other ﬂow patterns. In any cross section A, the gas phase ﬁlls the fraction (4.106) ε := AG /A , and the liquid phase the corresponding fraction 1 − ε = AL /A , because AG + AL = A. These fractions do not change within a suﬃciently small tube section Δz. Therefore ε = AG Δz/AΔz . The volume fraction of the vapour in the tube section under consideration is then ε := VG /V

(4.107)

and the volume fraction of the liquid is 1 − ε = VL /V . The quantity ε is called the volumetric vapour content. This is to be distinguished from the volumetric quality ε∗ := V˙G /V˙ , (4.108) which is the volumetric ﬂow of the vapour over the total ﬂow of vapour and liquid. A further term is the quality, that represents the ratio of the mass ﬂow rate M˙ G of the vapour to the total mass ﬂow rate M˙ = M˙ G + M˙ L : x∗ := M˙ G /M˙ . Thus

1 − x∗ = M˙ L /M˙ .

(4.109)

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

519

The quality has to be distinguished from the speciﬁc vapour content in thermodynamics, which is deﬁned by x = MG /M . With the mass ﬂow rates M˙ G of the gas and M˙ L of the liquid the mean velocity of both phases in any cross section can be obtained M˙ G x∗M˙ ˙ x∗ m = wG = = , (4.110) G AG G εA G ε M˙ L (1 − x∗) M˙ ˙ (1 − x∗ ) m = wL = = . (4.111) L AL L (1 − ε)A L (1 − ε) The ratio of the two velocities is known as slip or the slip factor s :=

x∗ 1 − ε L wG = . wL 1 − x∗ ε G

(4.112)

The quality x∗ and the volumetric quality ε∗ are linked to each other by x∗ =

M˙ G V˙ G G ε∗ V˙ G = = ε∗ V˙ G + (1 − ε∗ ) V˙ L M˙ G + M˙ L V˙ G G + V˙ L L

(4.113)

or

ε∗ . (4.114) ε∗ + (1 − ε∗ ) L /G The volumetric quality ε∗ and the vapour content ε coincide when the slip factor is equal to one, i.e. when wG = wL , which then gives x∗ =

ε∗ =

wG AG AG V˙ G =ε . = = ˙ w A + w A A V G G L L

The quality x∗ is normally known or is easy to ﬁnd out. In general, for ﬂow in unheated channels, the mass ﬂow rates of the individual phases are stipulated. In a heated channel the quality is yielded from an energy balance, Fig. 4.51. We assume here that the liquid enters the evaporator tube in a subcooled state. Its speciﬁc enthalpy at the inlet be h1 . The input heat ﬂow rate Q˙ heats the liquid to the saturation temperature where it begins to evaporate. The energy balance between the inlet and another cross section at the point z, disregarding the kinetic and potential energy, yields M˙ h1 + Q˙ = M˙ x∗ hG + (1 − x∗ ) hL . If we further assume that the vapour and liquid are in thermal equilibrium in the cross section at point z, then their speciﬁc enthalpies in the saturated state have to be calculated at pressure p(z). This gives hG = h and hL = h as well as h − h = Δhv the enthalpy of vaporization at pressure p in the cross section being considered. As we have assumed thermodynamic equilibrium, the quality is indicated by x∗th and is called the thermodynamic quality. This yields M˙ h1 + Q˙ = M˙ (x∗th Δhv + h)

520

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

and x∗th

1 = Δhv

Q˙ + h1 − h M˙

.

(4.115)

The assumptions made, mean that this equation is only valid if the vapour and liquid in a cross section are at the same temperature. It fails close to the inlet, where the quality x∗ is still low, and also with a high vapour content. In the vicinity of the inlet, vapour bubbles can already form on the hot wall, even when the core ﬂow is still subcooled. So the vapour and liquid are at diﬀerent temperatures. The quality is thus positive, whilst according to (4.115) a negative value for the thermodynamic quality is obtained, because the liquid is still subcooled, and therefore Q˙ + M˙ h1 < M˙ h . At high vapour content spray ﬂow develops. Heat is principally transferred to the vapour which is superheated, although ﬂuid drops are still present in the core ﬂow, which only evaporate slowly. The quality is therefore lower than one, even though the thermodynamic quality according to (4.115) has already reached a value of one. However, in regions of intermediate quality, where neither subcooled boiling or spray ﬂow occur, (4.115) delivers exact values. Fig. 4.52 shows a qualitative plot of the real quality x∗real against the thermodynamic quality x∗th based on (4.115).

Fig. 4.52: Qualitative plot of the real quality x∗real against the thermodynamic quality x∗th

4.2.9.4

Pressure drop in two-phase ﬂow

In two-phase ﬂow, the boiling temperature falls in the direction of ﬂow as a result of the pressure drop. This results in a change in the driving temperature drop, decisive for heat transfer along the ﬂow path. Calculation of the heat transfer without simultaneous investigation of the pressure drop is therefore impossible. The fundamentals steps for this shall be explained in the following.

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

521

Fig. 4.53: Force balance on a two-phase ﬂuid element

In the calculation of the pressure drop, we will consider a channel inclined at an angle γ to the horizontal, through which a two-phase ﬂuid ﬂows, Fig. 4.53. The forces exerted by the pressure, the friction forces at the channel wall and gravity all act on a volume element of length dz, as illustrated in the picture. We are presuming the ﬂow to be steady and one-dimensional and that the cross section of the channel is constant. The pressure, density and momentum ﬂux over a cross section are only dependent on the ﬂow path z. The momentum balance implies that the sum of the pressure, friction and gravitational forces are equal to the change in momentum dp d ˙ p− p+ dz − τ0 C dz − g A sin γ dz = (M w) dz dz dz or C dp 1 d ˙ − = τ0 + (M w) + g sin γ , (4.116) dz A A dz where τ0 is the shear stress at the channel wall and C is the circumference of the channel. The density of a two-phase mixture is calculated from = εG + (1 − ε)L .

(4.117)

The ﬂow momentum is made up of that of the gas and the liquid, according to M˙ w = M˙ G wG + M˙ L wL . Together with (4.111) and (4.112), this can also be written as M˙ 2 x∗2 (1 − x∗ )2 ˙ Mw = . + A εG (1 − ε)L

(4.118)

(4.119)

Putting (4.117) and (4.119) into (4.116) yields ∗2 C x dp (1 − x∗ )2 2 d = τ0 + m ˙ − + εG + (1 − ε)L g sin γ . (4.120) + dz A dz εG (1 − ε)L The total pressure drop is composed of three parts, the pressure drop due to friction C dp = τ0 , (4.121) − dz f A

522

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

the acceleration pressure drop ∗2 x (1 − x∗ )2 dp 2 d =m ˙ + − dz a dz εG (1 − ε)L

(4.122)

and the pressure drop as a result of gravity, which is also called the geodetic pressure drop dp − (4.123) = εG + (1 − ε)L g sin γ . dz g In channels with bends or constrictions additional pressure drops occur, which will not be dealt with here. The relevant literature is suggested for further reading on this topic [4.89]. The pressure drop due to friction exists because of the shear stress between the ﬂuid ﬂow and the channel wall. The acceleration pressure drop is yielded from the change in momentum in both phases, as in vapour-liquid ﬂows evaporation due to ﬂashing occurs because of the loss in pressure, and in heated channels, evaporation occurs in addition due to the heat input. This causes a change in the mass and velocity and therefore in the momentum ﬂux of both phases. The geodetic pressure drop is caused by the gravitational force acting on the ﬂuid. It disappears in horizontal ﬂows. Geodetic and acceleration pressure drops are often negligible in comparison to the frictional pressure drop. However, in heated channels with large heat and mass ﬂuxes the acceleration pressure drop can be considerable and no longer assumes negligible values. In an adiabatic, two-phase ﬂow, the acceleration pressure drop only exists as a result of further evaporation or expansion of the vapour or gas phase, and is small. A simple rule for adiabatic two-phase ﬂow in refrigeration plants say that the acceleration pressure drop does not play a role as long as Δpf /ps < 0.2 holds for the frictional pressure drop. If this is not the case, then the acceleration pressure drop has to be determined, according to (4.122), over the channel length between inlet 1 and outlet 2: ∗2 x2 x∗2 (1 − x∗2 )2 (1 − x∗1 )2 1 2 (p1 − p2 )a = m . (4.124) ˙ − + − ε2 G2 ε1 G1 (1 − ε2)L2 (1 − ε1)L1 Accurate calculations are only possible here, if a reliable relationship for the volumetric vapour content is available. If the slip factor can be set to s = 1, (homogeneous ﬂow), then, according to (4.113), the volumetric vapour content will be −1 G 1 − x∗ ε= + 1 . (4.125) L x∗ In complete vaporization, with a change in the quality from x∗1 = 0 to x∗2 = 1, ε1 = 0 and ε2 = 1 and the acceleration pressure drop will be 1 1 2 . (p1 − p2 )a = m ˙ − G2 L1

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

523

The frictional pressure drop normally constitutes the largest fraction of the total pressure drop. However, only empirical methods are available for its calculation. It includes not only the momentum transfer between the ﬂuid and the wall, but also the momentum transfer between the individual phases. These two processes cannot be measured separately and can only be estimated for simple ﬂows. Thus, only imprecise ideas of the inﬂuence of momentum transfer between the phases exist. At constant mass ﬂux, the frictional pressure drop does not show linear dependence on the quality between the limits x∗ = 0 and x∗ = 1, but rises with increasing x∗ until it reaches a maximum between x∗ = 0.7 and x∗ = 0.9, and then falls back to the pressure drop of a pure vapour stream, Fig. 4.54. This maximum is more pronounced the larger the diﬀerence in the densities of the two phases.

Fig. 4.54: Proﬁle of the frictional pressure drop

Methods for the determination of the frictional pressure drop usually start with simple models. For the most part, either homogeneous flow (homogeneous distribution of the phases s → 1) or heterogeneous flow (heterogeneous distribution of the phases, s > 1) are presumed. Less common are methods based upon speciﬁc ﬂow patterns and are only applicable if this ﬂow pattern is present. In the calculation of frictional pressure drop it is advantageous to deﬁne a few parameters that are suitable for the representation of two-phase frictional pressure drop and the volumetric quality. The frictional pressure drop is often reduced to the pressure drop for single phase ﬂow, using the deﬁnitions from Lockhart and Martinelli [4.90] dp dp := Φ2L (4.126) dz f dz L or dp dp := Φ2G . (4.127) dz f dz G Here (dp/dz)L is the frictional pressure drop of the liquid, (dp/dz)G is that of the vapour, under the assumption that each of the two phases is ﬂowing by itself through the tube. The factors Φ2L and Φ2G are deﬁned by the equations above. If these factors are known, only the pressure drop of the individual phases has

524

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

to be determined, to allow the frictional pressure drop for two-phase ﬂow to be calculated. The pressure drop in the two phases can be determined using well known methods. For the frictional pressure drop of a liquid stream, it holds that dp ˙ 2L 1 L wL2 1 m = −ζL (4.128) = −ζL dz L d 2 d 2L with m ˙ L = m(1 ˙ − x∗ ), where d is the diameter of the channel and ζ is the friction factor dependent on the Reynolds number. According to Blasius, for example, ζL = c/RenL ,

(4.129)

where c1 and n are functions of the ﬂow, i.e. whether it is laminar or turbulent, and the roughness of the tube. The Reynolds numbers is calculated under the assumption that only the liquid is ﬂowing through the tube ReL =

wL L d m ˙ Ld m ˙ (1 − x∗ )d = = . ηL ηL ηL

(4.130)

Another possibility for the investigation of the pressure drop in two-phase ﬂows exists in the determination of the frictional pressure drop of the gas and the liquid, under the assumption that the total mass of the ﬂuid would be ﬂowing through the tube either as liquid or as gas. In this case the factors ΦL0 and ΦG0 are deﬁned by dp dp := Φ2L0 (4.131) dz f dz L0 and

This gives

dp dz

dp dz

:=

Φ2G0

f

= −ζL0 L0

dp dz

.

(4.132)

G0

1 m ˙2 , d 2L

(4.133)

and the resistance factor ζL0 has to be determined with the Reynolds number ReL0 =

m ˙ d . ηL

(4.134)

The homogeneous model In ﬂows with a high proportion of small bubbles, x∗ → 0, in spray or drop ﬂow, x∗ → 1, or in ﬂows with small density diﬀerences, like those near the critical state, the frictional pressure drop can be well represented by the homogeneous model. The heterogeneous model delivers inaccurate results for these conditions. Calculations according to the homogeneous model are similar to those for single-phase ﬂow, although they involve suitably deﬁned mean property values.

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

525

The following holds for the frictional pressure drop in a homogeneous two-phase ﬂow 1 w2 dp ˙2 1m := −ζ = −ζ . (4.135) dz f d 2 d 2 With the assumption of equal liquid and vapour velocities, the volumetric vapour content is obtained from (4.125) and with that the density of the homogeneous ﬂow is −1 ∗ 1 − x∗ x = εG + (1 − ε)L = + . (4.136) G L The friction factor is calculated in the same way as for single-phase ﬂow, for example, according to Blasius (4.137) ζ = c/Ren . The dynamic viscosity of the homogeneous two-phase ﬂow now has to be put into the Reynolds number Re = md/η. ˙ Empirical equations for this have been suggested in the literature [4.91] to [4.93]. These include the limits η(x∗ = 0) = ηL and η(x∗ = 1) = ηG . According to McAdams et al. [4.91] it holds that 1 − x∗ x∗ 1 + , = η ηG ηL

(4.138)

according to Cicchitti et al. [4.92] η = x∗ ηG + (1 − x∗ ) ηL

(4.139)

∗ ηG ∗ ηL . + (1 − x ) η= x G L

(4.140)

and from Dukler et al. [4.93]

With (4.136), the frictional pressure drop in homogeneous two-phase ﬂow is obtained from (4.135) to be dp ˙ 2 x∗ 1m 1 − x∗ . (4.141) = −ζ + dz f d 2 G L On the other hand, the pressure drop, under the assumption that only liquid is ﬂowing through the tube, is 1m dp ˙ 2 (1 − x∗)2 = −ζL . (4.142) dz L d 2L The friction factor ζL of the liquid stream, according to Blasius’ law, is ζL = c/RenL

with ReL = m(1 ˙ − x∗ ) d/ηL .

(4.143)

With (4.142), (4.135) and (4.126), the factor Φ2L for homogeneous two-phase ﬂow is found to be L ζ 2 ∗ ΦL = 1+x − 1 (1 + x∗)−2 . (4.144) ζL G

526

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

The friction factor, still using Blasius’ law (4.137), and (4.143), can be eliminated, giving with (4.139) n ηG L 2 ∗ ∗ ΦL = 1 + x 1+x −1 − 1 (1 − x∗ )n−2 , (4.145) ηL G where n ∼ = 0.25 is the exponent of Blasius’ law (4.137) for turbulent ﬂow in smooth tubes. The heterogeneous model In contrast to the homogeneous model, the two phases ﬂow separately to each other and have diﬀerent velocities, so that slip exists between the phases. A particularly simple and frequently used method comes from Lockhart and Martinelli [4.90]. It is based on measurements of air-water and air-oil mixtures in horizontal tubes at low pressure. However the procedure has also proved itself in upward, vertical ﬂow of two-phase single and multicomponent mixtures. The basic idea of the Lockhart-Martinelli method is that the frictional pressure drop in a two-phase ﬂow can be determined, with use of a correction factor, from the frictional pressure drop in the individual phases. This means that the two-phase multipliers Φ2L and Φ2G are deﬁned according to (4.126) and (4.127). We put Φ2 (dp/dz)L X 2 := G2 = (4.146) ΦL (dp/dz)G with (dp/dz)L according to (4.142) and dp 1m ˙ 2 x∗2 = −ζG . dz G d 2G

(4.147)

It follows from (4.142) and (4.147) that (dp/dz)L ζL X = = (dp/dz)G ζG

2

1 − x∗ x∗

2

G . L

(4.148)

In general, the quantity X deﬁned by (4.146) is known as the Lockhart-Martinelli parameter. It assumes diﬀerent values depending on the type of ﬂow for the two phases, whether laminar or turbulent. The following combinations, indicated by indices on X, are possible: Flow state of the phases Gas Liquid laminar

laminar

Indices of X ll

laminar

turbulent

lt

turbulent

laminar

tl

turbulent

turbulent

tt

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

527

As an example we will calculate Xtt for the case where both phases are turbulent, a state that occurs frequently. Presuming the validity of Blasius’ law for the friction factor n m ˙ (1 − x∗ ) d n (4.149) ζL = c/ReL = c/ ηL and n m ˙ x∗ d n ζG = c/ReG = c/ , (4.150) ηG then, according to (4.158) Xtt2 =

1 − x∗ x∗

2−n

ηL ηG

n

G . L

(4.151)

For turbulent ﬂow in technically smooth tubes, the exponent n lies between 0.2 and 0.25. With n = 0.2 we have 0.9 0.1 0.5 ηL G 1 − x∗ Xtt = . (4.152) ∗ x ηG L Lockhart and Martinelli assumed that each of the two factors ΦG and ΦL can be represented as a function of the parameter X. Fig. 4.55 shows the quantities ΦL and ΦG , determined by Lockhart and Martinelli for the diﬀerent types of ﬂow, plotted against the parameter X.

Fig. 4.55: Investigation of the frictional pressure drop according to Lockhart and Martinelli [4.84]

The curves are reproduced well by the following equations C 1 + 2 , X X

(4.153)

Φ2G = 1 + CX + X 2 .

(4.154)

Φ2L = 1 + and

The values from Table 4.2 are to be used for the constant C. The ﬂow of a phase can be assumed to be laminar when Re < 1000, and turbulent when Re > 2000. The transition region 1000 < Re < 2000 is more

528

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

Table 4.2: Constants C in the equations (4.153) and (4.154) Gas/Vapour

Liquid

Index

C

laminar

laminar

ll

5

laminar

turbulent

lt

10

turbulent

laminar

tl

12

turbulent

turbulent

tt

20

diﬃcult to predict but to be on the safe side the values for turbulent ﬂow should be taken. The Lockhart-Martinelli method is especially simple and clear. In certain parameter regions its accuracy is surpassed by other methods, but it delivers satisfactory values for the pressure drop, irrespective of the application, within a range of uncertainty of around ±50%. Larger deviations are to be expected for tube diameters d > 0.1 m. Furthermore, it should also be taken into account, that the two-phase multipliers ΦL and ΦG were determined from measurements at low pressures. Other equations have been developed for higher pressure and greater demands on the accuracy of the result. They are normally only valid for certain substances and in a narrow range of parameters. The extensive literature on two-phase ﬂow, in particular the summary in [4.83], is suggested for further information on this subject. 4.2.9.5

The diﬀerent heat transfer regions in two-phase ﬂow

We shall now consider subcooled liquid fed into the bottom of a vertical evaporator tube, that is uniformly heated along its entire length. The heat ﬂux q˙ is assumed to be low and the tube should be long enough such that the liquid can be completely evaporated. Fig. 4.56 shows, on the left, alongside the various heat exchange regions that have already been explained, the proﬁles of the liquid and wall temperatures. As long as the wall temperature stays below that required for the formation of vapour bubbles, heat will be transferred by single-phase, forced ﬂow. If the wall is adequately superheated, vapour bubbles can form even though the core liquid is still subcooled. This is a region of subcooled boiling. In this area, the wall temperature is virtually constant and lies a few Kelvin above the saturation temperature. The transition to nucleate boiling, is, by deﬁnition, at the point where the liquid reaches the saturation temperature at its centre, and with that the thermodynamic quality is x∗th = 0. In reality, as Fig. 4.56 indicates, the liquid at the core is still subcooled due to the radial temperature proﬁle, whilst at the same time vapour bubbles form at the wall, so that the mean enthalpy is the same as that of the saturated liquid. As explained in the previous section, the saturation temperature in the core is reached further downstream from the point x∗th = 0.

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

529

Fig. 4.56: Wall and liquid temperatures, ﬂow pattern and the associated heat transfer regions, heated tube

In the nucleate boiling region heat transfer is chieﬂy determined by the formation of vapour bubbles and only to a small extent by convection. This region encompasses the bubble, plug, churn and a part of the annular ﬂow regimes. The vapour content constantly increases downstream, and at a suﬃciently high vapour content the churn ﬂow converts into an annular ﬂow, with a liquid ﬁlm at the wall and vapour, with liquid droplets, in the core. The entire nucleate boiling region is characterised by the formation of vapour bubbles at the wall. However in annular ﬂow, the liquid ﬁlm downstream is so thin and its resistance to heat transfer is so low, that the liquid close to the wall is no longer suﬃciently superheated, and the formation of bubbles at the wall is suppressed. Heat is conducted principally by the liquid that is evaporating at its surface. Heat is transferred by “convective evaporation”. As soon as the liquid ﬁlm at the wall is completely evaporated, the temperature of a wall being heated with constant heat ﬂux rises. This transition is known as dryout. The spray ﬂow region is entered, followed by a region where all the liquid

530

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

droplets being carried along by the vapour are completely evaporated, in which heat is transferred by convection to the vapour. The transition regions shown in Fig. 4.56, can extend over very diﬀerent areas depending on the size of the heat and mass ﬂux. 4.2.9.6

Heat transfer in nucleate boiling and convective evaporation

Nucleate boiling in saturated liquids, so-called saturated boiling, and convective evaporation occur most frequently in evaporators, and shall therefore be explained in some depth here. The extensive publications concerning the other types of heat transfer in two-phase ﬂows are suggested for further information, including [4.50]. By deﬁnition, saturated boiling begins when the quality, calculated assuming thermodynamic equilibrium from (4.115), is x∗th = 0. The mean liquid temperature is then equal to the saturation temperature. However, in reality at the start of saturated boiling, the liquid core is still subcooled and the liquid layer adjacent to the wall is superheated. If bubbles have already formed in the region of subcooled boiling, bubble formation is suppressed again even when the mean temperature approaches the saturation temperature. This is the case when, as a result of improved heat transfer, the heat removed from a two-phase ﬂow is equal to that supplied by the wall. Saturated boiling begins, when the heat supplied by the wall is greater than the heat that can be removed from the two-phase ﬂow without additional bubble formation. A suﬃciently large heat ﬂux is necessary for this to happen. Its calculation is explained in [4.50], p. 192. In the calculation of the heat transfer in saturated boiling it is presumed that the heat transfer is predominantly determined by the bubble formation. In addition, convection also has some inﬂuence on the heat transfer, although this may only be small. Models and empirical equations start from the heat transfer in boiling in free ﬂow. The inﬂuence of forced ﬂow is taken into account with an extra term. This is based on the concept that the growth of the bubbles is only slightly inﬂuenced by the ﬂow, as long as the bubbles are smaller than the superheated boundary layer. The heat transfer coeﬃcient is a combination of two parts α2Ph = αB + αC , (4.155) where αB is the heat transfer coeﬃcient in boiling in free ﬂow, section 4.2.7, and αC is the heat transfer coeﬃcient for forced ﬂow, if only the liquid had been ﬂowing through the tube. This is calculated from the Colburn relationship for heat transfer in a single-phase forced ﬂow Nu =

αC d = 0.023 Re0.7 P r1/3 λL

(4.156)

∗ ˙ )d/ηL and the Prandtl number with the Reynolds number Re = m ˙ Ld/ηL = m(1−x P r = νL /aL of the liquid. In (4.155), the heat transfer by forced ﬂow αC only amounts to a few percent of the total heat transfer. This calculation method does

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

531

not take into account the weak eﬀect of the quality on the heat transfer in the saturated boiling region, but reproduces measured values with suﬃcient accuracy. More exact equations that take this eﬀect into account have been communicated by Chawla [4.94], as well as by Stephan and Auracher [4.95]. When vapour and liquid ﬂow downwards in a vertical tube, the slip between the two phases is reduced because of the buoyancy. This leads to a deterioration in the heat transfer, and according to measurements made by Pujol [4.96] using the refrigerant R113, the heat transfer coeﬃcient αdown of the downward ﬂow is smaller by a factor 0.75 than that for upward ﬂow αup αdown = 0.75 αup .

(4.157)

The value αup can, for example, be calulated from (4.155). Although in (4.155) no diﬀerentiation was made between vertical and horizontal tubes, more recent measurements, by Steiner [4.97], have conﬁrmed the expectation that in horizontal tubes the vapour and liquid are always non-symmetrically distributed, disregarding very high ﬂow velocities. This means that heat transfer in saturated boiling in vertical and horizontal tubes cannot be calculated from uniﬁed equations. The upper side of a horizontal tube is wetted less by the liquid than the lower side. This eﬀect is especially noticeable when the tube wall is thin and a poor conductor of heat, because the temperatures over the perimeter are not as uniform as in thick walled tubes that conduct heat well. The heat transfer coefﬁcients are, therefore, variable in the ﬂow direction and over the perimeter. Local heat transfer measurements have not yet been carried out. Only heat transfer coeﬃcients averaged over the perimeter have been measured by several authors. Steiner [4.97] has evaluated these and his own data, and developed equations for the calculation of the heat transfer in horizontal tubes with good, and also in those with poor thermal conductivity. Further reference should be made to the representation [4.97] in the VDI-HeatAtlas. Information about heat transfer in saturated boiling in inclined tubes and tube bends can also be found in this publication. The region of saturated boiling is followed by that of convective evaporation. With the increasing vapour content the heat transfer from the wall to the ﬂuid improves. The thermal resistance of the boundary layer decreases in comparison to the thermal resistances in nucleate boiling. Likewise, the wall temperature drops, cf. Fig. 4.56, so that only a few or no bubbles are formed at the wall. The heat transfer is predominantly or exclusively determined by evaporation at the phase boundary between the liquid at the wall and the vapour in the core ﬂow. According to the model of Chen [4.98] it is assumed that the heat transfer coeﬃcient is a combination of two parts which are independent from each other. These are the part associated with bubble formation αB and that for convection αC : α2Ph = αB + αC . (4.158) The part αB is connected to the heat transfer coeﬃcient αB in free nucleate boiling. However because the temperature rise in the boundary layer of a forced ﬂow is

532

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

steeper than in free nucleate boiling, more heat will be released from the wall by conduction and the bubble formation will partially suppressed in comparison to that in free ﬂow, thus αB < αB in (4.158). The many diﬀerent eﬀects are well described by the equations of Steiner [4.97]. As he found from many experimental data the following correlation holds for the heat transfer coeﬃcient in forced convective evaporation inside a vertical tube, averaged over the circumference ⎧ 0.35 −2.2 ⎨ α2Ph ρ 0.01 1.5 (1 − x∗) + 1.9x∗0.6 = (1 − x∗) ⎩ αL ρ +x∗0.01

αG αL

1 + 8(1 − x∗)0.7

ρ ρ

⎫ 0.67 −2 ⎬−0.5 ⎭

(4.159)

and for the horizontal tube ⎧ 0.37 −2.2 ⎨ α2Ph ρ 0.01 (1 − x∗) + 1.2x∗0.4 = (1 − x∗) ⎩ αL ρ +x∗0.01

αG αL

1 + 8(1 − x∗)0.7

ρ ρ

⎫ 0.67 −2 ⎬−0.5 ⎭

(4.160)

Here αG and αL are the local heat transfer coeﬃcients of the single phase ﬂow of gas (Index G) and liquid (Index L) according to the equations for forced convective ﬂow given in 3.8.6. The Reynolds numbers are ReL = md/η ˙ L

und ReG = md/η ˙ G .

d is the inner diameter of the tube, or in annuli the hydraulic diameter d = do − di with do as the inner diameter of the outer tube and di as the outer diameter of the inner tube. All thermophysical properties are to be taken at saturation temperature. The equations are valid over the entire range 0 ≤ x∗ ≤ 1.

(4.159) holds for 3.5 ≤ ρ /ρ ≤ 5000, 10−3 ≤ p+ = p/pcr ≤ 0.8 and 3 ≤ d/mm ≤ 25.4.

(4.160) also holds for 3.5 ≤ ρ /ρ ≤ 5000, however 5 · 10−3 ≤ p+ = p/pcr ≤ 0.8 and 6 ≤ d/mm ≤ 25. In the range of low qualities 0 ≤ x∗ ≤ 0.2 the heat transfer of two-phase ﬂow in a horizontal tube is higher than in a vertical tube, because in a horizontal tube a greater amount of liquid is collected on the base of the tube, and enhances the heat transfer. The stratiﬁed ﬂow is predominant in horizontal tubes. However, at higher qualities an annular ﬂow prevails in horizontal and in vertical tubes.

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

4.2.9.7

533

Critical boiling states

As has already been explained in connection with boiling in free ﬂow, the heat transfer coeﬃcient falls quickly once a maximum heat ﬂux has been exceeded. The liquid at the wall is displaced by vapour. If the surface is heated electrically, by nuclear heating or thermal radiation, then the wall temperature rises rapidly after the maximum heat ﬂux has been reached. If in contrast, the wall temperature is determined by another ﬂuid, such as in a heat exchanger or condenser, a small increase in the temperature leads to a drastic fall in the heat ﬂux. These occurrences come together under the term of critical boiling states. This is understood to be a reduction in the heat transfer coeﬃcient after a critical heat ﬂux is exceeded. In general for the case of boiling in forced convection this is not identical to the maximum heat ﬂux in free ﬂow and can, as the following explains, be caused by diﬀerent mechanisms. Therefore we speak of critical heat ﬂux to distinguish it from the maximum heat ﬂux in free ﬂow boiling. The phenomena that are observed in free ﬂow also appear in forced ﬂow, but are more complex. There are two fundamental types of boiling crisis: a) With small volumetric vapour content film boiling occurs. The liquid is the continuous phase, and once a critical heat ﬂux has been reached, a vapour ﬁlm forms at the wall that separates the liquid from the hot wall. The higher thermal resistance of the vapour ﬁlm leads to a drop in the heat ﬂux if the wall temperature is imposed, or to an increase in the wall temperature if the heat ﬂux is stipulated. The critical heat ﬂux is larger, the smaller the volumetric vapour content. b) With a larger volumetric vapour content annular ﬂow develops. At the wall there is chieﬂy liquid present, and in the core the vapour forms a continuous phase. Once the critical heat ﬂux has been reached the liquid ﬁlm disappears at the wall and this becomes covered by vapour. This is known as dryout. If the vapour content is suﬃciently large the heated surface drys out at very low heat ﬂux. Downstream, small liquid drops can reach the heated surface from the core ﬂow, and because of the low heat ﬂux they are only partially vaporized. This type of dryout with subsequent spray cooling of the wall with liquid droplets is called “deposition controlled burnout”. Fig. 4.57 illustrates both types of critical boiling, namely ﬁlm boiling and dryout. A qualitative diagram of the change in the critical heat ﬂux with the quality is presented in Fig. 4.58. In the ﬁlm boiling region, the critical heat ﬂux decreases approximately linearly with the quality. In dryout the critical heat ﬂux drops markedly with the quality. It is only at high quality in a dryout region with subsequent spray cooling that it falls weakly with the quality. A lower limit for the critical heat ﬂux can be found from the energy balance qdπz ˙ = M˙ cpL [ϑL (z) − ϑ1 ] = α dπz [ϑ0 − ϑL (z)] ,

534

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

Fig. 4.57: Types of boiling crisis. a ﬁlm boiling; b dryout

Fig. 4.58: Critical heat ﬂux as a function of quality

where ϑ1 is the inlet temperature. From this follows ϑ0 = ϑL (z) + or q˙ =

q˙ q˙ dπz q˙ + = ϑ1 + ˙ α α M cpL ϑ0 − ϑ1 . dπz 1 + α M˙ cpL

As the wall temperature is signiﬁcantly greater than the saturation temperature once the critical heat ﬂux has been reached, then the lower limit for the critical heat ﬂux is q˙cr >

ϑs − ϑ1 Δϑu = , dπz dπz 1 1 + + α α M˙ cpL M˙ cpL

(4.161)

where Δϑu is the subcooling of the liquid at the inlet. Using this in the example of water with an initial subcooling of Δϑu = 50 K, mass ﬂux m ˙ = 1000 kg/m2 s and speciﬁc heat capacity cpL = 4.186 kJ/kgK, which boils in a 1 m long tube of d = 25 mm inner diameter, assuming the heat transfer coeﬃcient is α = 10 000 W/m2 K, the critical heat ﬂux has to be q˙cr > 3.62 · 105 W/m2 . Even when the critical heat ﬂux is reached not all the liquid is vaporized. Therefore an upper limit for the critical heat ﬂux is obtained, which is necessary for complete evaporation of the liquid. Once again this is found from an energy balance qdπz ˙ = M˙ (h − h1 ) = M˙ (Δhv + h − h1 ) . Substituting in

M˙ (h − h1 ) = M˙ cpL Δϑu ,

where cpL is the mean speciﬁc heat capacity between the inlet temperature ϑ1 and the boiling temperature ϑs , gives, because q˙cr < q: ˙ M˙ Δhv cpL Δϑu . (4.162) 1+ q˙cr < dπz Δhv

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

535

With the data from the example above and an enthalpy of vaporization of 2100 kJ/kg we have q˙cr < 1.4 · 107 W/m2 , so that, for the example, the critical heat ﬂux has to lie between 3.62 · 105 and 1.4 · 107 W/m2 . In view of the large number of empirical methods for the calculation of the critical heat ﬂux and the many inﬂuential quantities upon which this depends, it is recommended that the interval in which the critical heat ﬂux must lie is estimated. Application formulae for the calculation of the critical heat ﬂux can be found in the relevant literature, e.g. [4.50] p. 215.

4.2.9.8

Some empirical equations for heat transfer in two-phase ﬂow

In the following the equations presented previously for heat transfer in two-phase ﬂow shall be summarised and supplemented by further equations. 1. Subcooled boiling According to [4.102], bubble growth begins when the wall is superheated to a certain critical value with respect to the boiling point: 1/2 2 q˙ σ Ts (ϑ0 − ϑs )cr = 2 . Δhv λL For water, this gives the dimension equation [4.97]

p0.0234 0.436 5 q˙ p0.535 (ϑ0 − ϑs )cr = 9 1120 W/m2 valid for 1.03 bar ≤ p ≤ 138 bar, with q˙ in W/m2 , p in bar and (ϑ0 − ϑs )cr in K. Both equations presume a minimum roughness of the heated surface. The radius of the opening of the smallest pore required for bubble formation is 1/2 2σ Ts λL (r0 )cr = . Δhv q˙ The transferred heat ﬂux in the subcooled boiling region follows from q˙ = q˙B + q˙C = αB (ϑ0 − ϑs ) + αC (ϑ0 − ϑL ) . Here αB is the heat transfer coeﬃcient for nucleate boiling from section 4.2.7, αC is that by forced, single phase ﬂow, sections 3.7.4 and 3.9.3, ϑL is the adiabatic mixing temperature of the liquid. 2. Saturated boiling Subcooled boiling changes to saturated boiling when the quality, according to (4.115), is x∗th = 0. Heat transfer is strongly dependent on the heat ﬂux, but weakly dependent on the mass ﬂux and the quality; it holds that α2Ph = αB + αC .

536

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

Here αB is the heat transfer coeﬃcient for nucleate boiling from section 4.2.7 and αC is that for forced, single phase ﬂow, sections 3.7.4. 3. Convective boiling in vertical tubes Heat transfer is highly dependent on the mass ﬂux and the quality, but only shows weak dependence on the heat ﬂux. The local heat transfer coeﬃcient averaged over the circumference of the tube is ⎧ 0.35 −2.2 ⎨ α2Ph ρ ∗ 0.01 ∗ 1.5 ∗0.6 (1 − x ) + 1.9x = (1 − x ) ⎩ αL ρ +x∗0.01

αG αL

1 + 8(1 − x∗ )0.7

ρ ρ

⎫ 0.67 −2 ⎬−0.5 ⎭

Herein αG and αL are the local heat transfer coeﬃcients of the single phase ﬂow of gas (Index G) and liquid (Index L) according to 3.8.6 with ReL = md/η ˙ ˙ L , ReG = md/η G ,and d as the inner diameter of the tube, or in annuli the hydraulic diameter. All thermophysical properties are to be taken at saturation temperature. The equations are valid over the entire range 3.5 ≤ ρ /ρ ≤ 5000 and for 10−3 ≤ p+ = p/pcr ≤ 0.8 und 3 ≤ d/mm ≤ 25.4. 4. Convective evaporation in horizontal tubes The local heat transfer coeﬃcient averaged over the circumference of the tube is ⎧ 0.37 −2.2 ⎨ α2Ph ρ ∗ 0.01 ∗ ∗0.4 (1 − x ) + 1.2x (1 − x ) = ⎩ αL ρ +x∗0.01

αG αL

1 + 8(1 − x∗ )0.7

ρ ρ

⎫ 0.67 −2 ⎬−0.5 ⎭

With αG , αL, ReG , ReL and the reference state for thermophysical prop erties as under 3. Furthermore it is 3.5 ≤ ρ /ρ ≤ 5000, 5 · 10−3 ≤ p+ = p/pcr ≤ 0.8 and 6 ≤ d/mm ≤ 25.

4.2.10

Heat transfer in boiling mixtures

In industrial processes liquid mixtures of two or more components often have to be vaporized in order to separate the components from each other. Examples of this

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

537

include concentrating solutions, the recovery of solvents, distillation of sea water to gain drinking water or the separation of substances by boiling in distillation. Heat and mass transfer are closely linked with each other in evaporation, and the amount of vapour generated will, in contrast to the evaporation of pure substances, be determined by the mass transfer. It is known from earlier experiments that the heat transfer coeﬃcients in the evaporation of mixtures can be considerably smaller than those for the pure components of the mixture. On the other hand, signiﬁcant improvements in heat transfer have been noticed when one of the components in the mixture was very surface active. This leads to a reduction in the surface tension, and with that a larger bubble density, as was explained in section 4.2.2. At the same time the bubble frequency and therefore the heat transfer increase. However, mixtures of organic and inorganic liquids only contain surface active components in certain cases, (soap, addition of wetting media), so, in general, a reduction in the heat transfer coeﬃcient in comparison to those for the pure components should be reckoned with. In order to explain the fundamental phenomena we will only consider here the heat transfer in boiling of a binary mixture in free ﬂow. A large number of binary mixtures of organic liquids and of water with organic liquids were ﬁrst investigated by Bonilla and Perry [4.106]. In Fig. 4.59 the heat transfer coeﬃcients found from their measurements with an ethanol-water mixture are presented along with the results from Preußer [4.107]. Heat ﬂux and pressure

Fig. 4.59: Heat transfer coeﬃcients in boiling ethanol-water. y˜ mole fraction of ethanol in the vapour; x˜ mole fraction of ethanol in the liquid

538

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

are indicated in the diagram. As we can see, the heat transfer coeﬃcients α of the mixture are noticeably smaller than the values αid, which would be obtained, if we had interpolated linearly between the heat transfer coeﬃcients of the pure components. A signiﬁcant reduction of the heat transfer coeﬃcient in the region where a large diﬀerence exists between the vapour and ﬂuid composition y˜ − x˜ can also be seen from a comparison with the curve in Fig. 4.59. This decrease in the heat transfer in a region of large diﬀerence between vapour and liquid composition can be observed in many mixtures. It can be explained by the fact that during the formation of vapour bubbles the individual components convert in diﬀerent fractions from liquid to vapour. The more the vapour is enriched by the more volatile components, the lower the fraction of these components in the vicinity of the vapour bubble. This means that we have to distinguish between processes close to the wall and those in the core of the liquid. At the heated surface the vapour bubbles form at preferred places, which are suitable for the nucleation. The bubbles grow as a result of the heat input, until the buoyancy forces are large enough so that the bubble detaches from the surface. As the departure diameter is relatively small, only a part of the heat input serves for the bubble formation at the wall. Another part of the heat ﬂow is released by the heated surface into the liquid and serves at the surface of bubbles inside the liquid for further vapour formation. The hot wall thereby delivers the necessary nuclei for nucleate boiling and also releases heat into the liquid boundary layer, which is transmitted by convection or conduction via the liquid columns, to the vapour bubbles. This process is no diﬀerent for mixtures than for pure substances. However there are basic diﬀerences with respect to the heat transport to the rising bubbles, because the heat transport in mixtures is also determined by mass transfer. The inﬂuence of the composition of the mixture on the heat transfer is shown in the following diagrams taken from a paper by Stephan and K¨orner [4.108]. In a mixture that in a certain region shows large diﬀerences between vapour and liquid composition, as indicated by the boiling diagram Fig. 4.60 for an aceton/nbutanol mixture ((CH3 )2 CO/C4 H9 OH), the heat transfer is considerably reduced. This can be seen in Fig. 4.61, in which the heat transfer coeﬃcient is plotted against the composition. Where the diﬀerence y˜ − x˜ is largest, the greatest fall in the heat transfer coeﬃcient exists. This is particularly conspicuous in boiling mixtures that contain an azeotropic point. With regard to this, we will consider a methanol/benzene mixture (CH3OH/ C6 H6 ), Fig. 4.62 and Fig. 4.63. The mixture shows a sharp reduction in heat transfer in the region of large diﬀerences y˜ − x˜. Towards the azeotropic point the heat transfer increases again. In the vicinity of an azeotropic point the heat transfer coeﬃcient decreases. Obviously it is not the sign of the diﬀerence y˜ − x˜, but its absolute value that is decisive. Two methods have proved themselves in the reproduction of heat transfer measurements. One starts from empirical correlations for the pure substances. These correlations normally contain dimensionless numbers, that now have to be

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

Fig. 4.60: Boiling diagram acetone/nbutanol. Solid line: mole fraction x ˜ of the more volatile component in the liquid; dotted line: mole fraction y˜ of the most volatile component in the vapour

539

Fig. 4.61: Heat transfer coeﬃcient α for an acetone/n-butanol mixture. Heat ﬂux q˙ = 105 W/m2

formed with the properties of the binary mixture. The reduction in heat transfer because of inhibited bubble growth caused by diﬀusion is taken into account by the introduction of an extra term. This type of equation has been presented by Preußer [4.107] $ $ −0.0733 $ ∂ y˜ $$ α = α0 1 + $$(˜ y − x˜) , (4.163) ∂ x˜ $ p

in which the heat transfer coeﬃcient α0 is calculated from (4.98) established for pure substances. The property data for the mixture should be used for this case. Equation (4.163) is based on measurements at ambient pressure, and so is only valid for that. As Preußer showed a considerable fraction of the reduction in heat transfer compared to pure substances is caused by the change in the thermal properties, whilst the additional term in the square brackets provides a comparatively small contribution. For most hydrocarbon mixtures and those of hydrocarbons with water it lies between 0.8 and almost 1. All the other methods and models presented in the following are used to avoid the extensive calculations of the property data for the mixture. One of these correlations, which avoids the diﬃcult and time consuming

540

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

Fig. 4.62: Boiling diagram methanol/benzene. Solid line: mole fraction x ˜ of the most volatile component in the liquid; dashed line: mole fraction y˜ of the most volatile component in the vapour

Fig. 4.63: Heat transfer coeﬃcient α for the methanol/benzene mixture. Heat ﬂux q˙ = 105 W/m2

calculation of the properties of the mixture, has been suggested by Stephan and K¨orner [4.108]. It is based on the fact that the transfer of a given heat ﬂux to the mixture, requires a larger superheating of the wall Δϑ = ϑ0 − ϑs , than in the vaporization of the pure substances. The saturation temperature ϑs here is the boiling temperature of the mixture at the mean composition x ˜ of the liquid. In order to calculate the superheat, an “ideal” wall superheat Δϑid is deﬁned by Δϑid := x˜1 Δϑ1 + x˜2 Δϑ2 ,

(4.164)

wherein the temperature diﬀerences Δϑ1 and Δϑ2 between the wall and saturation temperature are yielded from the heat transfer coeﬃcients α1 and α2 of the pure substances 1 and 2 at the heat ﬂux q˙ of the mixture, in accordance with ˙ 1 Δϑ1 = q/α

and Δϑ2 = q/α ˙ 2

and can also be calculated with, for example, the aid of (4.98). According to (4.164) the driving temperature diﬀerences that would be yielded from the vaporization of the pure substances, are added together corresponding to the mole fractions of the two components. The actual driving temperature diﬀerence Δϑ is diﬀerent from the ideal value Δϑid by an extra temperature diﬀerence ΔϑE . We put Δϑ = Δϑid + ΔϑE or Δϑ = Δϑid (1 + θ) (4.165)

4.2 Heat transfer in boiling

541

with θ = ΔϑE /Δϑid . The dimensionless extra term θ principally depends on the diﬀerence between the vapour and liquid compositions and is always positive, due to the reduction in heat transfer in the mixture. Experiments with numerous mixtures yielded a linear relationship θ = K12 |˜ y − x˜| , (4.166) where K12 is a positive number, virtually independent of the composition. K12 can also be interpreted as a binary interaction parameter, that has to be found for each mixture at every pressure. In the pressure range between 1 and 10 bar, the pressure dependence of K12 can be represented approximately by the empirical equation 0 K12 = K12 (0.88 + 0.12 p/p0 ) (4.167) 0 is diﬀerent for each mixture, but is independent of with p0 = 1 bar. The value K12 pressure. A good mean value for binary mixtures of organic liquids and of water 0 with organic liquids is K12 = 1.4.

542

4 Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

4.3

Exercises

4.1: Saturated steam at a pressure of 0.101325 MPa condenses on a horizontal tube of 25 mm outer diameter and a wall temperature of 60 ◦ C. Estimate by what factor the accumulated condensate is reduced, if the steam is mixed with 10 mass-% = 6.47 mol % air at the same total pressure of 0.101325 MPa. The following property data are given for water at the saturation temperature of 100 ◦ C: liquid density L = 958.1 kg/m3 , vapour density G = 0.5974 kg/m3 , enthalpy of vaporization Δhv = 2257.3 kJ/kg, liquid thermal conductivity λL = 0.677 W/K m, dynamic viscosity of the liquid ηL = 0.2822 · 10−3 kg/s m, speciﬁc heat capacity of the steam-air mixture cpG = 1.93 kJ/kgK. Further, the heat transfer coeﬃcient between the steam-air mixture and the condensate ﬁlm is αG = 30 W/m2 K. 4.2: A horizontal, electrically conductive, cylindrical metal rod of 5 mm diameter, 0.5 m length and a surface temperature of 300 ◦ C is placed in a boiling water bath at 100 ◦ C. Calculate the thermal power of the rod. The following material data are given: density of the boiling water at 100 ◦ C: L = 958.1 kg/m3 , enthalpy of vaporization Δhv = 2256.5 kJ/kg, density of steam at the average ﬁlm temperature of 200 ◦ C: G = 0.467 kg/m3 , speciﬁc heat capacity cpG = 1.976 kJ/kgK, thermal conductivity λG = 0.0333 W/K m, kinematic viscosity νG = 0.347 · 10−4 m2 /s, emissivity ε0 = εL = 1. 4.3: In a process at a chemical plant, steam at 0.25 MPa is to be generated in a steam generator. This generator is a horizontal tube bundle, 25 kg/s of a heat carrying oil is ﬂowing through the tubes. The oil is to be cooled from 200 ◦ C to 150 ◦ C. The water will evaporate on the outside of the tubes. The heat transfer coeﬃcient between the oil and the wall is αi =700 W/m2 K. The thermal resistance of the tube wall may be neglected. The water enters the generator at approximately its boiling temperature. How much steam can be produced per hour? What is the area of the steam generator? The following values are given: speciﬁc heat capacity of the heat carrying oil cpoil =2.4 kJ/kgK, boiling temperature of water at 0.25 MPa: ϑs =127.4 ◦ C, enthalpy of vaporization Δhv =2181 kJ/kg. 4.4: A vertical, 3.5 m long evaporator tube of 12 mm internal diameter has water ﬂowing through it from bottom to top. The water enters the tube at a pressure of 5.5 MPa, subcooled with a temperature ϑi = 210 ◦ C. It is initially heated to the saturation temperature and then partly vaporized. The tube is heated with a constant heat ﬂux q˙ = 7.58 · 105 W/m2 . Calculate a) the tube length at which the water reaches the saturation temperature at its centre and b) the vapour content at the oulet. The following data are given: saturation temperature ϑs (5.5 MPa) = 269.9 ◦ C ≈ 270 ◦ C, enthalpies: h1 (210 ◦ C; 5.5 MPa) = 890 kJ/kg, h (270 ◦ C) = 1185 kJ/kg, enthalpy of vaporization Δhv = 1604 kJ/kg; density of the saturated liquid (270 ◦ C) = 767.5 kg/m3 , density of the saturated vapour (270 ◦ C) = 28.07 kg/m3 . The calculations may be done with constant densities. Mass ﬂux of water m ˙ = 103 kg/m2 s.

4.3 Exercises

543

4.5: Calculate the frictional pressure drop in the evaporation zone of the evaporator tube in exercise 4.4. The friction factor is ζL = 0.038, the dynamic viscosities are ηL = 97.4 · 10−6 kg/sm and ηG = 18.38 · 10−6 kg/sm. Both phases are ﬂowing turbulently. The saturation temperature is reached in the centre at a length Δz = 1.17 m. 4.6: Water at a temperature of ϑ1 = 250 ◦ C and a pressure of 6 MPa (associated saturation temperature ϑs = 275.58 ◦ C), ﬂows into a vertical steel tube of internal diameter 20 mm. The mass ﬂux is m ˙ = 1000 kg/m2 s. The heat ﬂux, due to the condensing steam on the outside of the tube, is approximately constant and amounts to q˙ = 8 · 105 W/m2 . a) How long does the tube have to be, if the quality at the outlet is to be x∗ = 0.25? The pressure drop can be disregarded in this case. b) What is the temperature of the wall at the outlet, under the assumption that the pressure drop is 500 hPa? The following data are given: liquid density L = 758.3 kg/m3 , vapour density G = 30.82 kg/m3 , dynamic viscosity of the liquid ηL = 95.25 · 10−6 kg/s m, dynamic viscosity of the vapour ηG = 18.51 · 10−6 kg/sm, Prandtl number of the liquid P rL = 0.844, Prandtl number of the gas P rG = 1.53, thermal conductivity of the liquid λL = 0.588 W/K m, speciﬁc enthalpy at the inlet h1 = 1085.7 kJ/kg, of the saturated liquid h (6 MPa) = 1213.9 kJ/kg, of the saturated vapour h (6 MPa) = 2785 kJ/kg.

•

5 Thermal radiation

Thermal radiation diﬀers from heat conduction and convective heat transfer in its fundamental laws. Heat transfer by radiation does not require the presence of matter; electromagnetic waves also transfer energy in empty space. Temperature gradients or diﬀerences are not decisive for the transferred ﬂow of heat, rather the diﬀerence in the fourth power of the thermodynamic (absolute) temperatures of the bodies between which heat is to be transferred by radiation is deﬁnitive. In addition, the energy radiated by a body is distributed diﬀerently over the single regions of the spectrum. This wavelength dependence of the radiation must be taken as much into account as the distribution over the diﬀerent directions in space. In the ﬁrst section the physical quantities, which are necessary for the formulation of the laws of thermal radiation, will be introduced. These laws also have to cover the directional and wavelength dependence of the radiant energy. The second section is devoted to the ideal radiator, the black body. The discovery of the laws governing black body radiation by M. Planck (1900) stands at the origin of modern physics, namely quantum theory. The third section is a discussion of the properties and material laws for real radiators. In section 5.4 we will deal with solar radiation and how it is weakened on passing through the Earth’s atmosphere. The following section concerns heat transfer between radiating bodies, so-called radiative exchange. The ﬁnal section in this chapter oﬀers an introduction to gas radiation which plays an important role in heat transfer in furnaces and combustion chambers.

5.1

Fundamentals. Physical quantities

As the laws for thermal radiation are diﬀerent to those valid for heat conduction and convective heat transfer, the essential terms and physical quantities, from which the thermal radiation laws are formulated, are introduced in the following sections.

546

5.1.1

5 Thermal radiation

Thermal radiation

All the considerations that follow are only valid for radiation that is stimulated thermally. Radiation is released from all bodies and is dependent on their material properties and temperature. This is known as heat or thermal radiation. Two theories are available for the description of the emission, transfer and absorption of radiative energy: the classical theory of electromagnetic waves and the quantum theory of photons. These theories are not exclusive of each other but instead supplement each other by the fact that each describes individual aspects of thermal radiation very well. According to quantum theory, radiation consists of photons (= light particles), that move at the velocity of light and have no rest mass. They transfer energy, whereby each photon transports the energy quantum ePh = h ν . Here, h = (6.626 068 96±0.000 000 33)·10−34 J s is the Planck constant, also known as Planck’s action quantum; ν is the frequency of the photons. Quantum theory is required to calculate the spectral distribution of the energy emitted by a body. Other aspects of heat transfer can, in contrast, be covered by classical theory, according to which the radiation is described as the emission and propagation of electromagnetic waves. Electromagnetic waves are transverse waves that oscillate perpendicular to the direction of propagation. They spread out in a straight line and in a vacuum at the velocity of light c0 = 299 792 458 m/s. Their velocity c in a medium is lower than c0 , whilst their frequency ν remains unchanged; the ratio n := c0 /c > 1 is the refractive index of the medium. The wavelength λ is linked to the frequency ν by λ·ν =c . The energy transported by the electromagnetic waves depends on λ. This also has to be considered for heat transfer. Fig. 5.1 shows the electromagnetic spectrum that extends from λ = 0 to very large wave lengths (λ → ∞). At small wave lengths (λ < 0.01 μm) we have gamma-rays and x-rays, neither of which are thermally stimulated and so therefore do not belong to thermal radiation. The same is true for the region of large wavelengths, (λ > 103 μm), that is determined by the oscillations of electronic switching networks (radar, television and radio waves). Neither region has any meaning for thermal radiation. The thermal radiation region is the middle of the range of wavelengths between around 0.1 μm and 1000 μm. Within this region bodies, whose temperatures lie between a few Kelvin and 2 · 104 K, radiate. This includes the visible light region between 0.38 μm (violet) and 0.78 μm (red). The designation of this radiation as light has no physical reason, but instead is based on the peculiarity that the human eye can “see” in this wavelength range.

5.1 Fundamentals. Physical quantities

547

Fig. 5.1: Electromagnetic wave spectrum

The wavelength interval 0.01 μm ≤ λ ≤ 0.38 μm is the range of ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Between 0.78 μm and 1000 μm lies infrared (IR) radiation. This is the wavelength range in which most earthly bodies radiate. The limits for thermal radiation at λ = 0.1 μm and λ = 1000 μm are somewhat arbitrary. Very hot bodies, e.g. stars, also radiate in the region λ < 0.1 μm. However they only release more than a few percent of their energy in this region if their temperature lies above 15000 K. Thermal radiation can also be emitted in the range λ > 1000 μm. If this is to make up more than a few percent of the total radiation, then the radiator has to be colder than around 12 K. An ideal radiator, the so-called black body, cf. section 5.2, at the temperature of boiling helium (4.22 K) has its maximum emission at λ = 686 μm, and in the wavelength region λ > 1000 μm more than 30% of the total radiation will be emitted.

Thermal radiation is not only dependent on the wavelength; in numerous problems, particularly in radiative exchange between diﬀerent bodies, its distribution in space must also be considered. This holds for the emission of radiative energy in the same way as for reﬂection and absorption of radiation incident on a body. This double dependency — on the wavelength and the direction in space — makes the quantitative description of heat radiation quite complicated. It requires four diﬀerent types of physical radiation quantities: – Directional spectral quantities. These describe the directional and wavelength distribution of the radiative energy in a detailed manner. They are of fundamental meaning, but are very diﬃcult to determine experimentally or theoretically. This is why we frequently employ radiation quantities that only include one eﬀect, either the dependence on the wavelength or the direction. – Hemispherical spectral quantities average the radiation into all directions of the hemisphere over a surface element and so are only dependent on the wavelength. – Directional total quantities average the radiation over all wavelengths and describe the dependence on the directions in the hemisphere. – Hemispherical total quantities combine the radiation over all wavelengths and from all directions. They do not provide information on the spectral distribution and the directional dependence of the radiation; but are frequently suﬃcient to provide the solution to radiative heat transfer problems.

548

5 Thermal radiation

This variety of physical quantities of radiation with their diﬀerent signiﬁcations causes some diﬃculties for the beginner, even though exact relationships exist between the four groups. The fundamental directional spectral quantities are used to calculate the other three by integration over the wavelength or over all the solid angles in the hemisphere, or ﬁnally over the two independent variables. In the following sections these four groups of quantities and their relationships for the speciﬁc cases of emission of radiation, the irradiation of an area, as well as the absorption and reﬂection of radiative energy, will be dealt with. All these cases are based on the same train of thought, only the expressions and the symbols are diﬀerent. It is, therefore, suﬃcient to discuss the emission of radiation in depth, whilst limiting ourselves to the exact deﬁnitions of the quantities and the establishment of the associated equations for the other cases.

5.1.2

Emission of radiation

By the emission of thermal radiation, internal energy of the emitting body is converted into energy of the electromagnetic waves or, in the language of quantum theory, the energy of photons, which leave the surface of the radiating body. In this emission process the atoms or molecules of the body change from a state of higher energy to one of lower energy. However we do not need to go into these intramolecular processes for the formulation of the important phenomenological laws of heat transfer. Matter emits radiation in all its aggregate states. In gases or solids which allow radiation go through (e.g. glass), the radiation emitted from a ﬁnite volume is the combination of the local emissions within the volume being considered. We will come back to a discussion of these volumetric emissions in section 5.6. In most solids and liquids the radiation released from molecules within the body is strongly absorbed by neighbouring molecules, so that it cannot reach the surface. Therefore, the radiation emitted by solids and liquids comes normally from molecules in a layer immediately below the surface. As the thickness of this layer only amounts to around 1 μm the emission can be associated with the surface, and we speak of radiating surfaces rather than radiating bodies.

5.1.2.1

Emissive power

We consider an element of the surface of a radiating body, that has a size of dA. The energy ﬂow (heat ﬂow) dΦ, emitted into the hemisphere above the surface element, is called radiative power or radiative ﬂow, Fig. 5.2. Its SI-unit is the Watt. The radiative power divided by the size of the surface element M := dΦ/ dA

(5.1)

5.1 Fundamentals. Physical quantities

549

Fig. 5.2: Radiation ﬂow dΦ, emitted from a surface element

is called the (hemispherical total) emissive power. This is the heat ﬂux released by radiation; the SI units for M are the same as the SI units for q, ˙ i.e. W/m2 . The emissive power M belongs to the group of hemispherical total quantities, as it combines the radiation energy emitted over the total range of wavelengths and into all the directions of the hemisphere. M is a property of the radiator; it changes above all with the thermodynamic temperature of the radiator, M = M (T ), and depends on the nature of its surface.

5.1.2.2

Spectral intensity

We will now investigate how the emitted radiation dΦ is distributed over the spectrum of wavelengths and the directions in the hemisphere. This requires the introduction of a special distribution function, the spectral intensity Lλ . It is a directional spectral quantity, with which the wavelength and directiondistribution of the radiant energy is described in detail. A certain direction in space is determined by two angular coordinates β and ϕ, Fig. 5.3. β is the polar anglemeasured outwards from the surface normal (β = 0) and ϕ is the circumferential angle with an arbitrarily assumed position for ϕ = 0. The radiative ﬂux, that falls on a small area dAn at a distance r from the surface element dA, perpendicular to the radiation direction, Fig. 5.4, is proportional to the solid angle element (5.2) dω = dAn /r2 . The small area dAn in Fig. 5.4 and with that the solid angle element dω result

Fig. 5.3: Spherical coordinates of the point P: distance from origin r, polar angle β, circumferential angle ϕ

Fig. 5.4: Radiative ﬂux d2 Φ into a solid angle element dω in the direction of the polar angle β and the circumferential angle ϕ

550

5 Thermal radiation

from the fact that the polar angle β changes by dβ and the circumferential angle ϕ by dϕ. So dAn = r dβ · r sin β dϕ = r2 sin β dβ dϕ, and we obtain for the solid angle element dω = sin β dβ dϕ . (5.3) The solid angle indicates the contents of a cone shaped section, whereby the apex of the cone coincides with the vertex of the solid angle. If a sphere of any radius R is placed around the vertex, the surface of the cone cuts an area of AK out of the surface of the sphere. The size of the solid angle is deﬁned by ω = AK /R2 , cf. the German Norm DIN 1315 [5.1]. The solid angle units are m2 /m2 and are called stere radians (unit symbol sr). They may also be replaced by the number 1.

Now d3 Φ signiﬁes the radiative ﬂow that the surface element dA emits into a solid angle element dω, that lies in the direction indicated by β and ϕ. Additionally d3 Φ contains only a part of this radiative ﬂux that is emitted at a certain wave length λ, in an inﬁnitesimal wave length interval dλ. This restriction of the radiative ﬂux to a solid angle element and a wavelength interval serves to describe the directional and wavelength dependence of the radiant energy. The following formulation can be made for d3 Φ d3 Φ = Lλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) cos β dA dω dλ .

(5.4)

This is the deﬁning equation for the fundamental material function Lλ , the spectral intensity; it describes the directional and wavelength dependence of the energy radiated by a body and has the character of a distribution function. The (thermodynamic) temperature T in the argument of Lλ points out that the spectral intensity depends on the temperature of the radiating body and its material properties, in particular on the nature of its surface. The adjective spectral and the index λ show that the spectral intensity depends on the wavelength λ and is a quantity per wavelength interval. The SI-units of Lλ are W/(m2 μm sr). The units μm and sr refer to the relationship with dλ and dω.

Fig. 5.5: Projection dAp of the surface element dA perpendicular to the radiation direction

The factor cos β that appears in (5.4) is a particularity of the deﬁnition of Lλ : the spectral intensity is not relative to the size dA of the surface element like in M (T ), but instead to its projection dAp = cos β dA perpendicular to the radiation direction, Fig. 5.5. It complies with the geometric fact that the emission of radiation for β = π/2 will be zero and will normally be largest in the direction

5.1 Fundamentals. Physical quantities

551

of the normal to the surface β = 0. An area that appears equally “bright” from all directions is characterised by the simple condition that Lλ does not depend on β and ϕ. This type of surface with Lλ = Lλ (λ, T ) is known as a diﬀuse radiating surface, cf. 5.1.2.4. 5.1.2.3

Hemispherical spectral emissive power and total intensity

The spectral intensity Lλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) characterises in a detailed way the dependence of the energy emitted on the wavelength and direction. An important task of both theoretical and experimental investigations is to determine this distribution function for as many materials as possible. This is a diﬃcult task to carry out, and it is normally satisfactory to just determine the radiation quantities that either combine the emissions into all directions of the hemisphere or the radiation over all wavelengths. The quantities, the hemispherical spectral emissive power Mλ and the total intensity L, characterise the distribution of the radiative ﬂux over the wavelengths or the directions in the hemisphere. The hemispherical spectral emissive power Mλ (λ, T ) is obtained by integrating (5.4) over all the solid angles in the hemisphere. This yields d2 Φ = Mλ (λ, T ) dλ dA with

(5.5)

Mλ (λ, T ) =

Lλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) cos β dω .

(5.6)

Here d2 Φ is the radiation ﬂow emitted from the surface element dA in the wavelength interval dλ into the hemisphere. The symbol in (5.6) signiﬁes that the integration should be carried out over all the solid angles in the hemisphere. The hemispherical spectral emissive power Mλ (λ, T ) with the SI-units W/m2 μm belongs to the hemispherical spectral quantities; it represents the wavelength distribution of the emissive power, Fig. 5.6. The area under the isotherm of Mλ(λ, T ) in Fig. 5.6 corresponds to the emissive power, because integration of (5.5) over all the wavelengths leads to ∞ dΦ =

Mλ (λ, T ) dλ dA ,

(5.7)

0

from which, due to (5.1) ∞ M (T ) =

Mλ (λ, T ) dλ 0

follows.

(5.8)

552

5 Thermal radiation

Fig. 5.6: Hemispherical spectral emissive power Mλ (λ, T ) as a function of wavelength λ at constant temperature T (schematic). The hatched area under the curve represents the emissive power M (T )

The integration in (5.6) over all the solid angles of the hemisphere corresponds to a double integration over the angular coordinates β and ϕ. With dω according to (5.3) we obtain 2π π/2 Mλ(λ, T ) =

Lλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) cos β sin β dβ dϕ .

(5.9)

ϕ=0 β=0

In most cases, the spectral intensity Lλ only depends on the polar angle β and not on the circumferential angle ϕ. We then obtain the more simple relationship π/2 Lλ (λ, β, T ) cos β sin β dβ . Mλ (λ, T ) = 2π

(5.10)

0

The directional distribution of the emission integrated over all the wave lengths is described by the total intensity L(β, ϕ, T ). This is found by integrating (5.4) over λ, yielding (5.11) d2 Φ = L(β, ϕ, T ) cos β dω dA with the total intensity ∞ Lλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) dλ .

L(β, ϕ, T ) =

(5.12)

0

Here d2 Φ is the radiation ﬂow emitted by the surface element into the solid angle element dω in the direction of the angle β and ϕ. The total intensity L has units W/m2 sr; it belongs to the directional total quantities and represents the part of the emissive power falling into a certain solid angle element. If we integrate (5.11) over all the solid angles in the hemisphere then we obtain the radiation ﬂow dΦ, emitted by the surface element in the entire hemisphere: dΦ = L(β, ϕ, T ) cos β dω dA . (5.13)

5.1 Fundamentals. Physical quantities

553

A comparison with (5.1) shows that the emissive power M (T ) according to (5.14) M (T ) = L(β, ϕ, T ) cos β dω

can be calculated from the total intensity L(β, ϕ, T ). To summarise, there are in total four radiation quantities for the characterisation of the emission of radiation from an area: 1. The spectral intensity Lλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) describes the distribution of the emitted radiation ﬂow over the wavelength spectrum and the solid angles of the hemisphere (directional spectral quantity). 2. The hemispherical spectral emissive power Mλ (λ, T ) covers the wavelength dependency of the radiated energy in the entire hemisphere (hemispherical spectral quantity). 3. The total intensity L(β, ϕ, T ) describes the directional dependency (distribution over the solid angles of the hemisphere) of the radiated energy at all wavelengths (directional total quantity). 4. The emissive power M (T ) combines the radiation ﬂow emitted at all wavelengths and in the entire hemisphere (hemispherical total quantity).

Lλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) Spectral intensity

Mλ (λ, T ) =

Lλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) cos β dω

HH j H H

HH H

∞

L(β, ϕ, T ) =

Lλ(λ, β, ϕ, T ) dλ

0

Hemispherical spectral emissive power

Total intensity

?

?

∞ M (T ) =

Mλ (λ, T ) dλ

0

Emissive power

M (T ) =

L(β, ϕ, T ) cos β dω

Emissive power

Fig. 5.7: Relationships between the four radiation quantities. Each arrow represents an integration

The relationships between the four quantities are schematically represented and illustrated in Fig. 5.7. The spectral intensity Lλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) contains all the information for the determination of the other three radiation quantities. Each

554

5 Thermal radiation

arrow in Fig. 5.7 corresponds to an integration; on the left ﬁrst over the solid angles in the hemisphere and then over the wavelengths, on the right ﬁrst over the wavelengths and then over the solid angles. The result of the two successive integrations each time is the emissive power M (T ). Example 5.1: The spectral intensity Lλ of radiation emitted by a body shall not depend on the circumferential angle ϕ and can be approximated by the function Lλ (λ, β, T ) = Lλ,0 (λ, T ) cos β ,

(5.15)

where Lλ,0 (λ, T ) has the pattern shown in Fig. 5.8 for a particular temperature. Calculate the intensity L(β, T ), the spectral emissive power Mλ (λ, T ) and the emissive power M (T ).

Fig. 5.8: Dependence of the spectral intensity Lλ,0 (λ, T ) in the direction normal to the surface (β = 0) on the wave length λ for a constant temperature

The intensity is obtained from (5.12) and (5.15) by integrating over all the wavelengths ∞ ∞ L(β, T ) = Lλ (λ, β, T ) dλ = cos β Lλ,0 (λ, T ) dλ 0 0 1 = cos β Lmax (4.0 − 3.0) μm + (8.0 − 4.0) μm λ,0 2 max = cos β Lmax 3.0 μm = L · cos β = 1650 W/m2 sr cos β , λ,0 cf. Fig. 5.8. For the spectral emissive power, it follows from (5.10) that π/2 π/2 Lλ (λ, β, T ) cos β sin β dβ = 2πLλ,0 (λ, T ) cos2 β sin β dβ .

Mλ (λ, T ) = 2π

0

0

The integral that appears here has, because of 3 β β cos β 1 cos2 β sin β dβ = − = 1 − cos3 β , 3 3 0

(5.16)

0

the value 1/3. With that we get 2π Lλ,0 (λ, T ) = 2.094 sr Lλ,0 (λ, T ) . 3 The spectral emissive power agrees with the function Lλ,0 (λ, T ) from Fig. 5.8 except for the factor 2.094 sr. The emissive power M (T ) is calculated according to (5.14) by integrating the intensity L(β, T ) over the solid angles of the hemisphere. This yields Mλ (λ, T ) =

M (T )

=

2π π/2 ϕ=0 β=0

L(β, T ) cos β sin β dβ dϕ = 2πLmax

π/2

cos2 β sin β dβ

0

= (2π/3)Lmax = 2.094 sr · 1650 W/m2 sr = 3456 W/m2 .

5.1 Fundamentals. Physical quantities

555

The radiation emitted by a small surface element dA of the body being considered here is absorbed by a sheet with a circular opening cf. Fig. 5.9. What proportion of the radiation ﬂow emitted by dA succeeds in passing through the opening? The radiation ﬂow emitted from the surface element dA in Fig. 5.9 that goes through the circular hole is indicated by dΦ . It holds for this, that 2π β

dΦ =

∗

β L(β, T ) cos β sin β dβ dϕ dA = 2πLmax

ϕ=0 β=0

∗

cos2 β sin β dβ dA 0

and with (5.16)

2π max L 1 − cos3 β ∗ dA . 3 The total radiation ﬂow emitted from dA is dΦ = M (T ) dA. For the desired ratio dΦ / dΦ we obtain dΦ / dΦ = 1 − cos3 β ∗ . dΦ =

Fig. 5.9: Radiation of a surface element through a circular opening in a sheet (s = 50 mm, d = 25 mm)

According to Fig. 5.9, it holds for the angle β ∗ that s 50 cos β ∗ =

=

= 0.9701 . s2 + (d/2)2 502 + 12.52 With that we have dΦ / dΦ = 0.0869; only a small portion of the radiation succeeds in passing through the opening, even though it lies vertically above the surface element.

5.1.2.4

Diﬀuse radiators. Lambert’s cosine law

No radiator exists that has a spectral intensity Lλ independent of the wave length. However, the assumption that Lλ does not depend on β and ϕ applies in many cases as a useful approximation. Bodies with spectral intensities independent of direction, Lλ = Lλ (λ, T ), are known as diﬀuse radiators or as bodies with diﬀuse radiating surfaces. According to (5.9), for their hemispherical spectral emissive power it follows that 2π π/2 Mλ(λ, T ) = Lλ (λ, T )

cos β sin β dβ dϕ .

(5.17)

ϕ=0 β=0

The double integral here has the value π, so that for diﬀuse radiating surfaces Mλ (λ, T ) = π Lλ (λ, T )

(5.18)

556

5 Thermal radiation

is yielded as a simple relationship between spectral emissive power and spectral intensity. As the intensity L is also independent of β and ϕ, from (5.11) we obtain d2 Φ = L(T ) cos β dω dA

(5.19)

for the radiative power of a diﬀuse radiating surface element into the solid angle element dω. The radiative power per area dA and solid angle dω is known as the directional emissive power I :=

d 2 Φ . dA dω

(5.20)

For a diﬀuse radiating surface, it follows from (5.19) that I(β, T ) = L(T ) cos β = In(T ) cos β ,

(5.21)

where In (T ) is the directional emissive power in the direction normal to the surface (β = 0), Fig. 5.10. This relationship is called Lambert’s cosine law 1 [5.2]; diﬀuse radiators are also called Lambert radiators. The emissive power of a Lambert radiator is found from (5.14) to be M (T ) = L(T ) cos β dω = π L(T )

(5.22)

in analogy to (5.18) for the corresponding spectral quantities.

Fig. 5.10: Intensity L = In (T ) and directional emissive power I = In (T ) cos β of a diﬀuse radiating surface

1 Johann Heinrich Lambert (1728–1777), mathematician, physicist and philosopher, was a tutor for the Earl P. v. Salis in Chur from 1748–1759, where he wrote his famous work on photometry [5.2]. In 1759 he became a member of the Bavarian Academy of Science and upon proposal by L. Euler became a member of the Berlin Academy of Science in 1765. Lambert wrote several philosophical works and dealt with subjects from all areas of physics and astronomy in his numerous publications. He presented the absolute zero point as a limit in the expansion of gases and constructed several air thermometers. In 1761 he proved that π and e are not rational numbers. His works on trigonometry were particularly important for the theory of map construction.

5.1 Fundamentals. Physical quantities

5.1.3

557

Irradiation

When a radiation ﬂow dΦin hits an element on the surface of a body, Fig. 5.11, the quotient E := dΦin/ dA (5.23) is known as the irradiance of the surface element of size dA. The irradiance E records the total heat ﬂux incident by radiation as an integral value over all wavelengths and solid angles in the hemisphere. It belongs to the hemispherical total quantities; its SI units are W/m2 .

Fig. 5.11: Radiation ﬂow dΦin of radiation incident on a surface element

The description of the direction and wavelength distribution of the radiation ﬂow is provided by radiation quantities that are deﬁned analogous to those for the emission of radiation. For the radiation ﬂow d3 Φin , from a solid angle element dω in the direction of the angles β and ϕ incident on the surface element dA, and which only contains the radiation in a wavelength interval dλ, we can make a statement analogous to (5.4) d3Φin = Kλ(λ, β, ϕ) cos β dA dω dλ .

(5.24)

The distribution function Kλ(λ, β, ϕ), the incident spectral intensity, is deﬁned by this. It describes the wavelength and directional distribution of the radiation ﬂow falling onto the irradiated surface element. Like the corresponding quantity Lλ for the emission of radiation, Kλ is deﬁned with the projection dAp = cos β dA of the irradiated surface element perpendicular to the direction of the incident radiation, Fig. 5.12. The SI units of Kλ are W/(m2 μm sr); the relationship to the wavelength interval dλ and the solid angle element dω is also clear from this.

Fig. 5.12: Projection dAp of the surface element dA perpendicular to the direction of the radiation incident under the polar angle β

In contrast to Lλ , Kλ is not a material property of the irradiated body, but a characteristic function of λ, β and ϕ for the incident radiative energy: It is the spectral intensity of the incident radiation. The spectral intensity remains constant along the radiation path from source to receiver, as long as the medium

558

5 Thermal radiation

Fig. 5.13: Irradiated surface with surface element dA, the radiation is obtained from the surface element dA∗ of a radiation source at a temperature T ∗

between the two neither absorbs nor scatters radiation and also does not emit any radiation itself2 . If this applies, and the radiation comes from a source with a temperature T ∗, it holds that Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) = Lλ (λ, β ∗ , ϕ∗ , T ∗) .

(5.25)

Here Lλ (λ, β ∗ , ϕ∗ , T ∗ ) is the spectral intensity of a surface element dA∗ of the radiation source, from which the solid angle dω starting at dA stretches out in the direction (β, ϕ), Fig. 5.13. The angles β ∗ and ϕ∗ indicate the direction at which the irradiated surface element dA appears to the radiation source. The incident spectral intensity, Kλ of dA, therefore depends indirectly on the temperature T ∗ and the other properties of the radiation source. The directional and wavelength distributions of the radiation energy incident on the irradiated surface element dA are, however, completely described by the function Kλ (λ, β, ϕ), without further knowledge of the properties of the radiation source being required. The statement of its temperature T ∗ in Kλ is, therefore, unnecessary. With known properties of the radiation source, Kλ(λ, β, ϕ) can be found from the spectral intensity of the radiation source. However in many cases this is very diﬃcult or even impossible, for instance when the radiation hitting dA comes from several sources or when the source of radiation is unknown. The incident spectral intensity Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) has then to be measured in situ, i.e. on the surface element dA. By integrating (5.24) over all the solid angles in the hemisphere, the radiation ﬂows that come from all the directions in the wavelength interval dλ are combined, giving d2Φin = Eλ (λ) dλ dA (5.26) with the spectral irradiance Eλ (λ) =

Kλ(λ, β, ϕ) cos β dω .

(5.27)

It belongs to the hemispherical spectral quantities. Integration of (5.26) over all wavelengths leads to (5.28) dΦin = E dA , 2 The proof for the constancy of the spectral intensity along a path through a medium that does not inﬂuence the radiation can be found in R. Siegel u. J.R. Howell [5.37], p. 518–520.

5.1 Fundamentals. Physical quantities

giving the irradiance already introduced by (5.23): ∞ E = Eλ (λ) dλ .

559

(5.29)

0

The spectral irradiance Eλ describes the distribution of the incident energy over the spectrum, whereby the radiation from all directions in the hemisphere is combined. If, on the contrary, the directional distribution of the radiation falling on the body is to be described, without considering the dependence on the wavelength, then (5.24) should be integrated over all λ. This gives the following for the radiation ﬂow which falls on the surface element dA from a particular solid angle element dω, d2Φin = K(β, ϕ) cos β dω dA

(5.30)

with the incident intensity ∞ Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) dλ .

K(β, ϕ) =

(5.31)

0

Through integration of the incident intensity over all solid angles the irradiance is ﬁnally obtained as E = K(β, ϕ) cos β dω . (5.32)

Just as for the emission of radiation, cf. 5.1.2, four radiation quantities are used for the characterisation of the incident radiation ﬂow on a surface: – The incident spectral intensity Kλ(λ, β, ϕ) describes the distribution of the incident radiation ﬂow over the solid angles of the hemisphere and the spectrum (directional spectral quantity). – The spectral irradiance Eλ (λ) describes the wavelength distribution of the radiation ﬂow incident from the entire hemisphere (hemispherical spectral quantity). – The incident intensity K(β, ϕ) describes the directional distribution of the incident radiation ﬂow (directional total quantity). – The irradiance E combines the incident radiative power of all directions and wavelengths (hemispherical total quantity). Fig. 5.14 shows the relationships between these four quantities. It is assembled in an analogous manner to Fig. 5.7, which contains the four quantities for emission of radiation.

5.1.4

Absorption of radiation

The radiation falling on a body can be partially reﬂected at its surface, whilst the portion that is not reﬂected penetrates the body. Here the radiative energy is

560

5 Thermal radiation

Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) Incident spectral intensity

Eλ (λ) =

+

Q

Q sQ Q Q Q

∞

Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) cos β dω

K(β, ϕ) =

Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) dλ 0

Spectral irradiance

Incident intensity

?

?

∞ E=

Eλ (λ) dλ

E=

K(β, ϕ) cos β dω

0

Irradiance

Irradiance

Fig. 5.14: Relationships between the four radiation quantities of irradiation

absorbed and then converted into internal energy or part of it may be allowed to pass through the body. The absorbed portion is very important in terms of heat transfer. It is covered by the four absorptivities described in the following. These four belong to the four groups of physical radiation quantities introduced in 5.1.1. Just as in 5.1.3 we will consider a radiation ﬂow d3 Φin according to (5.24), coming from a solid angle element dω, that hits a surface element dA and only contains the radiation power within a wavelength interval dλ. For the absorbed portion of the radiation ﬂow we put d3 Φin,abs = aλ(λ, β, ϕ, T ) d3 Φin

(5.33)

and with that deﬁne the directional spectral absorptivity aλ . This dimensionless quantity, which has a value below one, is a material property of the absorbing body; it depends on the variables given in (5.33) namely wavelength λ, polar angle β, circumferential angle ϕ and the temperature T of the absorbing surface element. In addition to this the directional spectral absorptivity is also strongly inﬂuenced by the surface properties, e.g. the roughness of the surface. Using aλ allows the absorbed portions of the integrated radiation ﬂows introduced in 5.1.3 to be calculated. By integrating (5.33) over all solid angles in the hemisphere, the absorbed part of the hemispherical irradiation of the surface element dA in the wavelength interval dλ is obtained d2Φin,abs =

aλ(λ, β, ϕ, T )Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) cos β dω dλ dA .

(5.34)

5.1 Fundamentals. Physical quantities

561

Table 5.1: Deﬁnitions of the absorptivities and the relationships that exist between them

Directional spectral absorptivity aλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) :=

d3 Φin,abs d3 Φin

aλ is a material property of the absorbing body and gives, for every wavelength λ and for each direction (β, ϕ), the absorbed part of the incident radiation ﬂow d3 Φin , which, in a wavelength interval dλ, comes from a solid angle element dω.

Hemispherical spectral absorptivity aλ (λ, T ) :=

d2 Φin,abs 1 = a (λ, β, ϕ, T ) · Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) cos β dω d2 Φin Eλ (λ) λ

aλ covers the radiation ﬂow d2 Φin , which comes from the entire hemisphere within a certain wavelength interval, and provides, for each wavelength λ, the absorbed portion of the spectral irradiance Eλ (λ).

Directional total absorptivity

a (β, ϕ, T ) :=

d2 Φin,abs d2 Φin

1 = K(β, ϕ)

∞

aλ (λ, β, ϕ, T )Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) dλ

0

a describes the radiation ﬂow d2 Φin of all wavelengths that comes from a certain solid angle element, and gives, for each direction (β, ϕ), the absorbed portion of the incident intensity K(β, ϕ).

Hemispherical total absorptivity dΦin,abs 1 = dΦin E

a(T ) := 1 = E

∞ 0

∞ aλ (λ, T )Eλ (λ) dλ 0

aλ (λ, β, ϕ, T )Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) cos β dω dλ

a covers the radiation ﬂow dΦin of all wavelengths that comes from the entire hemisphere and gives the absorbed part of the irradiance E.

If, however, (5.33) is integrated over all wavelengths then the absorbed portion of the total radiative power from a solid angle element dω is obtained. This gives 2

d

Φin,abs

∞ = 0

aλ (λ, β, ϕ, T )Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) dλ cos β dω dA .

(5.35)

562

5 Thermal radiation

Finally, (5.34) can be integrated over all wavelengths or (5.35) over all solid angles in the hemisphere. This gives the absorbed part of the total radiation ﬂow hitting the surface element dA: ∞ dΦin,abs = 0

aλ(λ, β, ϕ, T )Kλ(λ, β, ϕ) cos β dω dλ dA .

(5.36)

Now, by putting these absorbed energy ﬂows in relation to the associated incident radiation ﬂows d2 Φin from (5.26), d2 Φin from (5.30) and dΦin from (5.28), the absorptivities presented in Table 5.1 are obtained. These describe either the absorption of radiation coming from all directions in the hemisphere or over all wavelengths or ﬁnally the absorption of the total radiation on the surface element. All absorptivities are less than one, but in contrast to the directional spectral absorptivity aλ , aλ (λ, T ), a (β, ϕ, T ) and a(T ) are not material properties of the absorbing body. They also depend on the direction and wavelength distribution of the radiation falling on the body, which are given by the incident spectral intensity Kλ (λ, β, ϕ). The four absorptivities from Table 5.1 correspond to the four radiation quantities in 5.1.3 used to describe the irradiation of a surface element quantitatively. This multitude of absorptivities is required for applications where the selectivity of the absorbing surface with respect to the direction and the wavelength region as well as the directional and wavelength dependency of the incident radiation have to be considered. Example 5.2: The hemispherical spectral absorptivity of a surface which appears bright to the eye is strongly simpliﬁed given by ⎧ ⎨ αλ1 = 0.10 for 0 ≤ λ ≤ λ1 aλ (λ, T ) = ⎩ αλ2 = 0.80 for λ1 < λ < ∞ with λ1 = 1.50 μm; Fig. 5.15. So, at small wavelengths, only a low amount of radiative energy will be absorbed, whilst at large wavelengths signiﬁcantly more radiation energy will be absorbed. Radiation hits the surface, from a source at a temperature T ∗ with spectral irradiance c1 Eλ (λ, T ∗ ) = 5 exp(−c2 /λT ∗ ) . (5.37) λ 3 ∗ Here c2 = 14.5 · 10 μm K and c1 is a constant of proportionality. For T = 1000 K and T ∗ = 5777 K (temperature of the sun’s surface) calculate the hemispherical total absorptivity a(T ).

Fig. 5.15: Approximation of the hemispherical spectral absorptivity aλ of a surface

5.1 Fundamentals. Physical quantities

563

The wavelength and temperature dependency given by (5.37) correspond to a relationship found by W. Wien [5.3] in 1896 to be approximately valid for the hemispherical spectral emissive power Mλs (λ, T ∗ ) of an ideal radiator, a black body, with a temperature T ∗ . We will come back to the properties of black bodies in section 5.1.6 and more extensively in 5.2.2. In our example a spectral irradiance Eλ ∼ Mλs has been assumed, so that its indirect dependence on T ∗ appears explicitly in (5.37). Fig. 5.16 shows the spectral irradiance Eλ according to (5.37) for T ∗ = 1000 K and T ∗ = 5777 K. Here, the proportionality constants c1 were each chosen so that for both temperatures the maximum of Eλ , which appears at λmax = c2 /5T ∗ , was the same. The hatched areas in Fig. 5.16 are proportional to the absorbed fraction of the incident radiation ﬂow, whilst the areas under the Eλ curves correspond to the irradiance E. The desired hemispherical total absorptivity a(T ) is, according to (5.28) and (5.36) the ratio of these areas. For T ∗ = 1000 K an absorptivity close to aλ2 will be expected. In contrast the largest portion of the solar radiation (T ∗ = 5777 K) falls in the region of small wavelengths (λ < λ1 ); therefore for solar radiation a total absorptivity only slightly larger than aλ1 is expected.

Fig. 5.16: Spectral irradiance Eλ (λ, T ∗ ) according to (5.37) for T ∗ = 1000 K and T ∗ = 5777 K. The ordinates of the maxima were arbitrarily chosen to be the same. The hatched areas represent the absorbed part of the irradiance E(T ∗ ). The results found from Fig. 5.16 can be conﬁrmed by the following calculations. According to Table 5.1 the hemispherical total absorptivity is obtained to be ∞ a(T ) =

aλ1

aλ (λ, T )Eλ (λ) dλ

0

E

=

λ1

Eλ (λ) dλ + aλ2

0

∞

∞ λ1

Eλ (λ) dλ .

(5.38)

Eλ (λ) dλ

0

The evaluation of the integrals is facilitated by the introduction of the dimensionless variable ζ := c2 /λT ∗ which with

Eλ (ζ, T ∗ ) = c1 /c52 T ∗5 ζ 5 e−ζ

and dλ = −

c2 dζ T ∗ ζ2

564

5 Thermal radiation

gives for the absorptivity aλ1 a (ζ1 ) =

∞ ζ1

ζ 3 e−ζ dζ + aλ2 ∞

ζ1 0

ζ 3 e−ζ dζ .

ζ 3 e−ζ dζ

0

It depends on ζ1 = c2 /λ1 T ∗ and therefore indirectly on the temperature T ∗ of the radiation source. The integrals that appear here can be calculated from ζ 3 e−ζ dζ = C − e−ζ ζ 3 + 3ζ 2 + 6ζ + 6 = C − F (ζ) . This then gives

1 {aλ1 F (ζ1 ) + aλ2 [6 − F (ζ1 )]} . (5.39) 6 For the radiation from the source at T ∗ = 1000 K, ζ1 = 9.667, from which, with F (ζ1 ) = 0.0791, the total absorptivity a = 0.791 is yielded. The result expected from Fig. 5.16 a ≈ aλ2 = 0.80 is therefore conﬁrmed. The incident solar radiation with T ∗ = 5777 K yields the value ζ1 = 1.6733 and from that F (ζ1 ) = 5.4646. This yields, from (5.39), the much smaller absorptivity a = 0.162. The hemispherical total absorptivity is not only a property of the absorbing surface. Rather, it depends on the spectral distribution of the incident radiation energy. This is shown by the diﬀerent values of a for the mainly short-wave solar radiation, in which the absorption properties at small wavelengths are decisive, and for the incident radiation from an earthly source, for which the long-wave portion of the absorption spectrum aλ (λ, T ) is of importance. a (ζ1 ) =

5.1.5

Reﬂection of radiation

The radiation ﬂow reﬂected from the surface of a body can be described using dimensionless reﬂectivities, in the same manner as for the absorbed power with the absorptivities dealt with in the last section. However, this involves further complications if we do not only want to ﬁnd out what proportion of the radiation from a certain direction is reﬂected but also in which direction the reﬂected energy is sent back. The possible reﬂective behaviour of a surface can be idealised by two limiting cases: mirrorlike (or specular) reﬂection and diﬀuse reﬂection. In mirrorlike reﬂection the ray incident from the angles β and ϕ will be reﬂected at an equal polar angle βr = β, but at a circumferential angle ϕr = ϕ + π, Fig. 5.17. On a diﬀuse reﬂecting surface the radiation falling from a certain direction (β, ϕ) generates a reﬂected radiation whose total intensity is equal over all radiating directions away from the surface (βr , ϕr ), cf. Fig. 5.18. The reﬂective behaviour of real surfaces lies somewhere between these two limits. Shiny, polished metal surfaces reﬂect in approximately mirror fashion. Rough and matt surfaces reﬂect in good approximation in a diﬀuse manner. Here the scale of the roughness must also be seen in relation to the wavelength of the radiation. A surface may be rough for short wave radiation, whilst for long wave radiation it

5.1 Fundamentals. Physical quantities

Fig. 5.17: Mirrorlike reﬂection of radiation incident from the polar angle β

565

Fig. 5.18: Diﬀuse reﬂection of the radiation incident from the polar angle β

may be considered to be smooth. The complex relationships for the consideration of the directional distribution of the reﬂected radiation have to be described by bidirectional reﬂectivities, which are dependent on two pairs of angles (β, ϕ) and (βr , ϕr ). We will not look at this here, but suggest the extensive discussion of this subject by R. Siegel et al [5.4] for further reading. In the following we will restrict ourselves to the introduction of reﬂectivities which only provide us with the portion of the incident radiation that is reﬂected, without specifying what proportion of the reﬂected energy is sent back in which direction. However, in the two limiting cases of mirrorlike and diﬀuse reﬂection, this question has already been answered, see Fig. 5.17 and 5.18. As the reﬂectivities are deﬁned in a completely analogous way to the absorptivities discussed in 5.1.4, it is suﬃcient to consider Table 5.2, which is the analogue of Table 5.1, without further explanations. In addition if the body does not allow radiation to pass through it, then the balance is d3 Φin,ref + d3 Φin,abs = d3 Φin ,

(5.40)

according to which, the incident radiation will either be reﬂected or absorbed. Dividing (5.40) by d3 Φin gives the relationship rλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) + aλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) = 1 .

(5.41)

The two material functions rλ and aλ of an opaque body are not independent of each other. The directional spectral reﬂectivity rλ is determined by the directional spectral absorptivity aλ. The similar relationship between the diﬀerent absorptivities and reﬂectivities from Tables 5.1 and 5.2, respectively, mean that equations analogous to (5.41) are valid, with which the three other reﬂectivities can be found from the corresponding absorptivities.

566

5 Thermal radiation

Table 5.2: Deﬁnitions of the reﬂectivities and the relationships existing between them

Directional spectral reﬂectivity rλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) :=

d3 Φin,ref d3 Φin

rλ is a material property of the reﬂecting body and gives, for each wavelength λ and for each direction (β, ϕ), the reﬂected portion of the incident radiation ﬂow d3 Φin , which, in the wavelength interval dλ, comes from a solid angle element.

Hemispherical spectral reﬂectivity rλ (λ, T ) :=

d2 Φin,ref 1 = r (λ, β, ϕ, T )Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) cos β dω d2 Φin Eλ (λ) λ

rλ covers the radiation ﬂow d2 Φin , which comes from the entire hemisphere, within a certain wavelength interval, and provides, for each wavelength λ the reﬂected part of the spectral irradiance Eλ (λ).

Directional total reﬂectivity

r (β, ϕ, T ) :=

d2 Φin,ref d2 Φin

1 = K(β, ϕ)

∞

rλ (λ, β, ϕ, T )Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) dλ

0

r covers the radiation ﬂow d2 Φin of all wavelengths which comes from a certain solid angle element, and gives, for each direction (β, ϕ), the reﬂected portion of the incident intensity K(β, ϕ).

Hemispherical total reﬂectivity dΦin,ref 1 = dΦin E

r(T ) := 1 = E

∞ 0

∞ rλ (λ, T )Eλ (λ) dλ 0

rλ (λ, β, ϕ, T )Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) cos β dω dλ

r covers the radiation ﬂow dΦin , of all wavelengths, that comes from the entire hemisphere and gives the reﬂected fraction of the irradiance.

5.1.6

Radiation in an enclosure. Kirchhoﬀ ’s law

Thermodynamic relationships exist between the emission and absorption capabilities of a body. These were ﬁrst discovered in 1860 by G.R. Kirchhoﬀ3 [5.5]. These 3

Gustav Robert Kirchhoﬀ (1824–1887) ﬁrst formulated and published the laws named after him for electrical networks when he was still a student at university in K¨onigsberg. In 1850 he was nominated professor in Breslau and in 1854 he became a professor in Heidelberg. It was here that he with R. Bunsen carried out investigations into the emission and absorption of radiation. Their results became known as Kirchhoﬀ’s radiation laws and as Bunsen-Kirchhoﬀ spectral analysis. In 1875 he became Professor of Theoretical Physics of the University of Berlin. Alongside his teacher F. Neumann, Kirchhoﬀ was a founder of theoretical physics in Germany.

5.1 Fundamentals. Physical quantities

Fig. 5.19: Cavity with adiabatic walls

567

Fig. 5.20: Black body (aλ ≡ 1) in an adiabatic and isothermal cavity

relationships also show that an upper limit exists for the emitted radiation ﬂow. In order to derive these, we will consider an adiabatic evacuated enclosure, like that shown in Fig. 5.19, with walls of any material. In this enclosure a state of thermodynamic equilibrium will be reached: The walls assume the same temperature T overall, and the enclosure is ﬁlled with radiation, which is known as hollow enclosure radiation. In the sense of quantum mechanics this can also be interpreted as a photon gas in equilibrium. This equilibrium radiation is fully homogeneous, isotropic and non-polarised. It is of equal strength at every point in the hollow enclosure and is independent of direction; it is determined purely by the temperature T of the walls. Due to its isotropic nature, the spectral intensity L∗λ of the hollow enclosure radiation does not depend on β and ϕ, but is, as Kirchhoﬀ was the ﬁrst to recognise, a universal function of wavelength and temperature: L∗λ = L∗λ (λ, T ), which is also called Kirchhoﬀ’s function. As the enclosure is ﬁlled with the same diﬀuse radiation, the incident spectral intensity Kλ for every element of any area that is oriented in any position, will, according to (5.25), be the same as the spectral intensity of the hollow enclosure radiation: Kλ = L∗λ (λ, T ) .

(5.42)

A small body is located in the enclosure that, once thermodynamic equilibrium has been reached, assumes the same temperature T as the walls, Fig. 5.20. This body shall have the special property that it completely absorbs all incident radiation from every direction at every wavelength. Its directional spectral absorptivity is (independent of λ, β, ϕ and T ) always one: aλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) ≡ 1 .

(5.43)

Then, according to 5.1.4, its three other absorptivities aλ , a and a are also equal to one. Kirchhoﬀ named this ideal absorber a black body. According to the 2nd law, the state of this equilibrium system consisting of radiation in an enclosure and the black body cannot change despite the absorption of the radiation in the enclosure. The black body therefore has to replace the radiation it absorbs by its own emission of radiation. This holds for every

568

5 Thermal radiation

wavelength interval and every solid angle element; otherwise the distribution of the hollow enclosure radiation, given by L∗λ (λ, T ), would change, and the thermodynamic equilibrium in the enclosure would be disturbed. So the radiation ﬂow d3 Φs , emitted by the black body in a particular solid angle element dω and within a certain wavelength interval dλ has to be the same as the radiation ﬂow d3 Φ∗in of the hollow enclosure radiation that hits the black body. According to (5.4), the radiation ﬂow emitted from the black body is d3 Φs = Lλs (λ, β, ϕ, T ) cos β dω dλ dA , where Lλs is its spectral intensity. The incident radiation ﬂow of the hollow enclosure radiation is, from (5.24) and (5.42), d3 Φ∗in = L∗λ (λ, T ) cos β dω dλ dA .

(5.44)

From the condition of thermodynamic equilibrium, d3 Φs = d3 Φ∗in, it follows that Lλs (λ, β, ϕ, T ) = L∗λ (λ, T ) . According to this, the spectral intensity of the black body is independent of direction and is the same as the spectral intensity of hollow enclosure radiation at the same temperature: (5.45) Lλs (λ, T ) = L∗λ (λ, T ) . Hollow enclosure radiation and radiation of a black body (aλ ≡ 1) have identical properties. The black body radiates diﬀusely; from (5.18) it holds for its hemispherical spectral emissive power that Mλs (λ, T ) = πLλs (λ, T ) .

(5.46)

We will now consider an enclosure with a body that has any radiation prop-

Fig. 5.21: Body with any directional spectral absorptivity aλ in an adiabatic enclosure

erties, Fig. 5.21. Thermodynamic equilibrium means that this body must also emit exactly the same amount of energy in every solid angle element and in every wavelength interval as it absorbs from the hollow enclosure radiation. It therefore holds for the emitted radiative power that d3 Φ = aλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) d3 Φ∗in

(5.47)

5.2 Radiation from a black body

569

with aλ as its directional spectral absorptivity. For d3 Φ we use the expression from (5.4); the radiation ﬂow d3 Φ∗in of the hollow enclosure radiation is given by (5.44). With (5.45), for the spectral intensity of any radiator, it follows that Lλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) = aλ (λ, β, ϕ, T )Lλs (λ, T ) .

(5.48)

This is the law from G.R. Kirchhoﬀ [5.5]: Any body at a given temperature T emits, in every solid angle element and in every wavelength interval, the same radiative power as it absorbs there from the radiation of a black body (= hollow enclosure radiation) having the same temperature. Therefore, a close relationship exists between the emission and absorption capabilities. This can be more simply expressed using this sentence: A good absorber of thermal radiation is also a good emitter. As the black body is the best absorber, aλ ≡ 1, it also emits the most. From (5.48) with aλ ≤ 1 the inequality follows Lλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) ≤ Lλs (λ, T ) . At a given temperature the black body emits the maximum radiative power at each wavelength and in every direction. It is not possible for any other body at the same temperature to emit more radiative power in any wavelength interval or any solid angle than that emitted by a black body at that temperature. The black body is also the ideal emitter. The determination of the spectral intensity Lλs (λ, T ) of a black body as the thermodynamic upper limit of emission is therefore an important task of the theory of thermal radiation; we will consider this in the following sections.

5.2

Radiation from a black body

As shown in 5.1.6, the laws of thermodynamics demand that there must be an upper limit for the spectral intensity Lλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) for all bodies. This maximum emission is associated with an ideal radiator, the black body. Its radiation properties shall be dealt with in the following.

5.2.1

Deﬁnition and realisation of a black body

A black body is deﬁned as a body where all the incident radiation penetrates it and is completely absorbed within it. No radiation is reﬂected or allowed to pass through it. This holds for radiation of all wavelengths falling onto the body from all angles. In addition to this the black body is a diﬀuse radiator. Its spectral intensity Lλs does not depend on direction, but is a universal function Lλs (λ, T ) of

570

5 Thermal radiation

the wavelength and the thermodynamic temperature. The hemispherical spectral emissive power Mλs (λ, T ) is linked to Kirchhoﬀ’s function Lλs (λ, T ) by the simple relationship Mλs (λ, T ) = πLλs (λ, T ) , (5.49) see (5.46). The determination of the universal functions Lλs (λ, T ) or Mλs (λ, T ) is a fundamental task of physics. This was solved experimentally towards the end of the 19th century, but a theoretical basis for the measured data was ﬁrst found by M. Planck4 in 1900. Through assumptions, which later formed one of the foundations of quantum theory, he was able to formulate the law for the spectral intensity named after him, which has been conﬁrmed experimentally and is considered to be correct until today.

Fig. 5.22: Isothermal hollow enclosure for the realisation of a black body. 1 insulation; 2 heating; 3 copper cylinder; 4 reﬂected radiation; 5 polished surface; 6 black surface; 7 incident beam; 8 strongly absorbing surface

4 Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Planck (1858–1947) became Professor of Theoretical Physics in Kiel in 1885; from 1888 to 1920 he taught at the University of Berlin, where he was successor to G.R. Kirchhoﬀ. From 1894 onwards he was a member of the Prussian Academy of Science. Planck dealt with thermodynamic problems in his PhD thesis (1879), in particular with the 2nd law and the concept of entropy. He found his famous radiation law in 1900, by linking thermodynamic laws for the energy and entropy of hollow enclosure radiation with the electromagnetic radiation theory, statistical methods and the assumption that energy was made up of a large number of discrete, small energy elements (quanta). Planck also dealt with the theory of relativity and the philosophical basis of science. In 1918 he was awarded the Nobel prize for Physics.

5.2 Radiation from a black body

571

The black body got its name because of the property of a good absorber to appear black to the eye when visible light falls on its surface. However, the eye is only an indicator of the absorption capability of a body within the very small wavelength region of visible light, see Fig. 5.1. Therefore, surfaces which appear to be black, such as soot or black platinum only approximately attain the complete absorption of radiation at all wavelengths, which is the prerequisite for a black body. In order to realise the black body as a reference standard for radiation measurements a cavity with a small opening, like that shown in Fig. 5.22, is used. A beam coming through this opening hits the enclosure wall, and will be partly absorbed there. The portion that is reﬂected hits another point on the wall where it will once again be absorbed with a small part being reﬂected, and so on. With a suﬃciently small opening to the enclosure only a tiny part of the beam entering the enclosure will be able to leave it. The condition of complete absorption of the entering radiation is fulﬁlled to a high degree. The opening of the enclosure therefore absorbs (almost) like a black body. So, according to Kirchhoﬀ’s law it radiates black body radiation.

5.2.2

The spectral intensity and the spectral emissive power

We refrain from deriving the equations for the spectral intensity and the hemispherical spectral emissive power of a black body, found by M. Planck [5.6], for this see [5.7]. They are Mλs (λ, T ) = πLλs (λ, T ) =

c1 . λ5 [exp (c2/λT ) − 1]

(5.50)

The two radiation constants c1 and c2 are made up of fundamental natural constants, from the velocity of light c0 in a vacuum, the Planck constant h and the Boltzmann constant k. With the best values for these quantities, according to [5.8], (5.51a) c1 = 2πhc20 = (3.741 771 07 ± 0.000 000 29) · 10−16 Wm2 and c2 = hc0/k = (14 387.752 ± 0.024) μm K

(5.51b)

are obtained. Planck’s law (5.50) is illustrated in Fig. 5.23 for several isotherms. These have a horizontal tangent at λ = 0. The emission of radiation at small wavelengths is initially very low, but increases steeply with increasing λ, runs through a maximum and then falls back to a lower value. For λ → ∞ the limit value Mλs = 0 is yielded. A characteristic is the displacement of the maximum to small wavelengths with increasing temperature. Here, the maximum value Mλs (λmax , T ) increases rapidly with T . The diﬀerent isotherms do not cross each other (except at λ = 0); at every wavelength the emission of radiation increases with rising temperature. In Fig. 5.24, Mλs is reproduced with a logarithmic scale. The region of visible light is also indicated. It is only at suﬃciently high temperatures that a signiﬁcant

572

5 Thermal radiation

Fig. 5.23: Hemispherical spectral emissive power Mλs (λ, T ) of a black body according to Planck’s radiation law (5.50)

Fig. 5.24: Hemispherical spectral emissive power Mλs (λ, T ) of a black body, according to (5.50), with a logarithmic scale.The hatched wavelength region corresponds to the region of visible light.

portion of the emissive power is emitted within this wavelength interval. First, at the so-called Draper point at 798 K (525 ◦ C), [5.9], will a heated body in dark surroundings appear as a dark red object to the human eye. The sun emits radiation with a hemispherical spectral emissive power approximately corresponding to a black body at 5777 K. As Fig. 5.24 shows, at this temperature the maximum of Mλs lies in the visible spectral region. The human eye has adapted itself to this and is at its most sensitive at these wavelengths.

5.2 Radiation from a black body

573

The position of the maximum of Mλs on an isotherm is found from the condition ∂Mλs = 0 , T = const . ∂λ This leads to the transcendental equation c2 exp (c2 /λT ) = 1 1− 5λT with the solution (c2 /λmax T ) = 4.965 114 23 or λmax T = (2897.7686 ± 0.0048)μm K .

(5.52)

This is a form of Wien’s5 [5.10] displacement law. It is frequently used to calculate the temperature of a radiator from its measured wavelength λmax , under the assumption that it behaves like a black body. The isotherms of Planck’s radiation law (5.50) may be reproduced by a single curve, if instead of Mλs , Mλs /T 5 over the product λT or the dimensionless quantity x := λT /c2

(5.53)

Mλs (λT ) c1 = T5 (λT )5 [exp (c2 /λT ) − 1]

(5.54)

Mλs (x) c1/c52 = T5 x5 (e1/x − 1)

(5.55)

is plotted. This gives

or

with c1 /c52 = (0.606 893 5 ± 0.000 052) · 10−12 W/(μm m2 K5 ). The maximum for this function appears at xmax =

λmax T = 0.201 405 235 c2

(5.56)

and has the value Mλs (xmax ) c1 W = 21.201 435 7 5 = (0.128 670 1 ± 0.000 001 1) · 10−10 . 5 T c2 μm m2 K5 (5.57) So, the maximum value of Mλs increases with the ﬁfth power of T . Fig. 5.25 shows the ratio Mλs (x)/Mλs (xmax ). In Table 5.3 the values of Mλs (λT )/T 5 calculated using (5.54) as a function of λT are presented. 5

Wilhelm Carl Werner Otto Fritz Franz Wien (1864–1928) became an assistant to Hermann v. Helmholtz at the Physikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt in Berlin in 1890. It was there that he discovered the displacement law in 1893, and also published an equation for Mλs in 1896, that only slightly diﬀered from Planck’s law. Wien became Professor of Physics at the TH in Aachen in 1896, moved in 1899 to become a professor in W¨ urzburg, and once again changed to the University of Munich in 1920. In 1911 he was awarded the Nobel prize for Physics as an acknowledgement of his work on thermal radiation.

574

5 Thermal radiation

Fig. 5.25: Dimensionless representation of Planck’s radiation law from (5.55) and (5.57) The relationships communicated for Mλs (λ, T ) are exactly valid for the radiation of a black body in a vacuum. With radiation in a medium with refractive index n > 1 the propagation velocity c and the wavelength λM ar smaller than in a vacuum; although the frequency ν remains the same. In Planck’s law, some change has to be made. The velocity of light in a vacuum c0 that appears in the constants c1 and c2 has to be replaced by c, and in (5.50) λ is replaced by λM . Taking into account the relationship c = c0 /n, instead of (5.54), we obtain c1 MλM ,s (λM T ) = , n3 T 5 (nλM T )5 [exp (c2 /nλM T ) − 1] where c1 and c2 have their original meanings according to (5.50). The values in Table 5.3 can be used, if λT is interpreted as nλM T and Mλs /T 5 as MλM ,s /n3 T 5 . The emissive power of a black body in a medium with a refractive index n will be ∞ MλM ,s (λM , T ) dλM = n2 Ms (T ) ,

Ms,n (T ) = 0

where Ms (T ) is the emissive power in a vacuum. This will be calculated in the next section. As the refractive index n of air and other gases lies very close to one, the increase in the emission compared to emission into a vacuum (n = 1) is of very little importance. Exceptions to this are the radiation eﬀects in molten glass with n ≈ 1.5 and similar semi-transparent materials, see [5.11].

5.2.3

The emissive power and the emission of radiation in a wavelength interval

According to (5.8) the emissive power Ms (T ) of a black body is obtained by integration of Mλs (λ, T ) over all wavelengths. A surprisingly simple result comes out of the fairly complex equation (5.50). With c2 dλ = dx T

5.2 Radiation from a black body

575

Table 5.3: Hemispherical spectral emissive power of a black body divided by the ﬁfth power of the temperature, according to (5.54) and fraction function F (0, λT ) according to (5.60) as a function of the product λT λT

Mλs /T 5

μm K

10−10 W 2 5

F (0, λT )

m μmK

1000 1050 1100 1150 1200

0.00211 0.00328 0.00485 0.00686 0.00933

0.00032 0.00056 0.00091 0.00142 0.00213

1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700

0.01230 0.01573 0.01963 0.02395 0.02864 0.03365 0.03892 0.04438 0.04998 0.05563

0.00308 0.00432 0.00587 0.00779 0.01011 0.01285 0.01605 0.01972 0.02388 0.02854

1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200

0.06130 0.06691 0.07242 0.07778 0.08295 0.08790 0.09261 0.09704 0.10119 0.10504

0.03369 0.03934 0.04549 0.05211 0.05920 0.06673 0.07469 0.08306 0.09180 0.10089

2250 2300 2350 2400 2450

0.10859 0.11182 0.11475 0.11737 0.11969

2500 2550 2600 2650 2700

0.12172 0.12346 0.12493 0.12613 0.12709

λT

Mλs /T 5

μm K

10−10 W 2 5

F (0, λT )

m μmK

λT

Mλs /T 5

μm K

10−10 W m2 μmK5

F (0, λT )

2750 2800 2850 2900 2950 3000 3050 3100 3150 3200

0.12781 0.12830 0.12859 0.12867 0.12857 0.12831 0.12788 0.12730 0.12659 0.12576

0.21660 0.22789 0.23922 0.25056 0.26191 0.27323 0.28453 0.29578 0.30697 0.31810

4500 4550 4600 4650 4700 4750 4800 4850 4900 4950

0.08641 0.08482 0.08325 0.08169 0.08016 0.07864 0.07715 0.07568 0.07423 0.07280

0.56431 0.57186 0.57927 0.58654 0.59367 0.60067 0.60754 0.61428 0.62089 0.62737

0.11031 0.12003 0.13002 0.14026 0.15071

3250 3300 3350 3400 3450 3500 3550 3600 3650 3700 3750 3800 3850 3900 3950 4000 4050 4100 4150 4200

0.12482 0.12377 0.12263 0.12141 0.12011 0.11875 0.11733 0.11586 0.11434 0.11279 0.11120 0.10959 0.10796 0.10631 0.10465 0.10297 0.10130 0.09962 0.09794 0.09626

0.32915 0.34011 0.35097 0.36173 0.37238 0.38291 0.39332 0.40360 0.41375 0.42377 0.43364 0.44338 0.45297 0.46241 0.47172 0.48087 0.48987 0.49873 0.50744 0.51600

5000 5050 5100 5150 5200 5250 5300 5350 5400 5450 5500 5550 5600 5650 5700 5750 5800 5850 5900 5950

0.07140 0.07002 0.06866 0.06732 0.06601 0.06472 0.06346 0.06222 0.06100 0.05981 0.05863 0.05748 0.05636 0.05525 0.05417 0.05311 0.05207 0.05105 0.05005 0.04907

0.63373 0.63996 0.64608 0.65207 0.65795 0.66371 0.66937 0.67491 0.68034 0.68566 0.69089 0.69600 0.70102 0.70594 0.71077 0.71550 0.72013 0.72468 0.72914 0.73351

0.16136 0.17217 0.18312 0.19419 0.20536

4250 4300 4350 4400 4450

0.09459 0.09293 0.09128 0.08965 0.08802

0.52442 0.53269 0.54081 0.54878 0.55662

6000 6050 6100 6150 6200

0.04812 0.04718 0.04626 0.04536 0.04448

0.73779 0.74199 0.74611 0.75015 0.75411

576

5 Thermal radiation

Table 5.3: (continued) λT

Mλs /T 5

F (0, λT )

6250 6300 6350 6400 6450

10−10 W m2 μmK5 0.04362 0.04278 0.04195 0.04115 0.04035

0.75800 0.76181 0.76554 0.76921 0.77280

6500 6600 6700 6800 6900 7000 7100 7200 7300 7400

0.03958 0.03808 0.03665 0.03527 0.03395 0.03269 0.03148 0.03033 0.02922 0.02816

0.77632 0.78317 0.78976 0.79610 0.80220 0.80808 0.81374 0.81918 0.82443 0.82949

7500 7600 7700 7800 7900 8000 8100 8200 8300 8400

0.02714 0.02617 0.02523 0.02434 0.02348 0.02266 0.02187 0.02111 0.02038 0.01969

8500 8600 8700 8800 8900 9000 9100 9200 9300 9400 9500 9600 9700 9800 9900

μm K

λT

Mλs /T 5

F (0, λT )

λT

Mλs /T 5

F (0, λT )

0.97765 0.97834 0.97899 0.97962 0.98023 0.98081 0.98137 0.98191 0.98243 0.98293

10000 10100 10200 10300 10400 10500 10600 10700 10800 10900

10−10 W m2 μmK5 0.01164 0.01128 0.01094 0.01061 0.01029 0.00998 0.00969 0.00940 0.00913 0.00886

0.91416 0.91618 0.91814 0.92004 0.92188 0.92367 0.92540 0.92709 0.92872 0.93031

17000 17200 17400 17600 17800 18000 18200 18400 18600 18800

10−10 W m2 μmK5 0.00198 0.00190 0.00182 0.00175 0.00168 0.00162 0.00156 0.00150 0.00144 0.00139

11000 11200 11400 11600 11800

0.00861 0.00812 0.00767 0.00725 0.00686

0.93185 0.93480 0.93758 0.94021 0.94270

19000 19200 19400 19600 19800

0.00133 0.00129 0.00124 0.00119 0.00115

0.98341 0.98387 0.98431 0.98474 0.98516

0.83437 0.83907 0.84360 0.84797 0.85219 0.85625 0.86018 0.86397 0.86763 0.87116

12000 12200 12400 12600 12800 13000 13200 13400 13600 13800

0.00649 0.00615 0.00583 0.00552 0.00524 0.00498 0.00473 0.00450 0.00428 0.00407

0.94505 0.94728 0.94939 0.95139 0.95329 0.95509 0.95681 0.95843 0.95998 0.96145

20000 20500 21000 21500 22000 22500 23000 23500 24000 24500

0.00111 0.00102 0.00093 0.00085 0.00079 0.00072 0.00067 0.00062 0.00057 0.00053

0.98555 0.98649 0.98735 0.98814 0.98886 0.98952 0.99014 0.99070 0.99123 0.99172

0.01902 0.01838 0.01776 0.01717 0.01660 0.01606 0.01553 0.01503 0.01455 0.01408

0.87457 0.87787 0.88105 0.88413 0.88711 0.88999 0.89278 0.89547 0.89808 0.90060

0.01363 0.01320 0.01279 0.01239 0.01201

0.90305 0.90541 0.90770 0.90992 0.91207

14000 14200 14400 14600 14800 15000 15200 15400 15600 15800 16000 16200 16400 16600 16800

0.00388 0.00369 0.00352 0.00336 0.00321 0.00306 0.00292 0.00280 0.00267 0.00256 0.00245 0.00234 0.00225 0.00215 0.00206

0.96285 0.96419 0.96546 0.96667 0.96783 0.96893 0.96999 0.97100 0.97196 0.97289 0.97377 0.97461 0.97542 0.97620 0.97694

25000 26000 27000 28000 29000 30000 32000 34000 36000 38000 40000 45000 50000 55000 60000

0.00049 0.00043 0.00037 0.00032 0.00028 0.00025 0.00020 0.00016 0.00013 0.00010 0.00008 0.00005 0.00004 0.00002 0.00002

0.99217 0.99297 0.99368 0.99429 0.99482 0.99529 0.99607 0.99669 0.99719 0.99759 0.99792 0.99851 0.99890 0.99917 0.99935

μm K

μm K

5.2 Radiation from a black body

577

according to (5.53), the following is obtained from (5.55) ∞ ∞ ∞ Mλs (x) dx c1 4 4 dx = 4 T Ms (T ) = Mλs (λ, T ) dλ = c2T . T5 c2 x5 (e1/x − 1) 0

0

0

4

The deﬁnite integral has the value π /15, so Ms (T ) = σT 4

(5.58)

with W c1 π 4 2 π5 k4 = = (5.670 400 ± 0.000 040) · 10−8 2 4 (5.59) 4 c2 15 15 c20 h3 m K is obtained, [5.8]. The best directly measured, but not so accurate value is σ = (5.669 59 ± 0.000 76) · 10−8 W/m2 K4 from [5.12]. Equation (5.58) is the famous law from Stefan and Boltzmann, cf. also section 1.1.5. J. Stefan [5.13] presented this law in 1879 based on experimental results, whilst L. Boltzmann [5.14] derived this relationship between emissive power and temperature in 1884, by thermodynamic reasoning and using results from the classic electromagnetic theory of radiation. Of course neither researcher could reduce the constant σ, also called the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, to fundamental constants of nature, as the appearance of the Planck constant h in (5.59) shows that this is only possible using quantum theory. σ=

Fig. 5.26: Isotherm of Mλs (λ, T ). The emissive power in the wavelength interval (λ1 , λ2 ) corresponds to the hatched area

Fig. 5.27: Function F (0, λ) according to (5.60), is represented by the ratio of the hatched area to the total area under the isotherm of Mλs (λ, T )

The emissive power Ms (T ) of a black body according to (5.34) is illustrated in Fig. 5.26 by the total area under the isotherm of Mλs (λ, T ). In many calculations for radiative transfer, the portion of the emissive power from a certain wavelength interval (λ1 , λ2 ) is required. This part corresponds to the hatched area in Fig. 5.26. Its calculation requires the deﬁnition of the fraction function λ2 Mλs (λ, T ) dλ λ2 1 λ1 F (λ1 , λ2 ) := ∞ Mλs (λ, T ) dλ . = σT 4 Mλs (λ, T ) dλ λ1 0

578

5 Thermal radiation

Using the function 1 F (0, λ) := σT 4

λ Mλs (λ, T ) dλ ,

(5.60)

0

which is illustrated in Fig. 5.27, F (λ1 , λ2 ) can be expressed as F (λ1 , λ2 ) = F (0, λ2 ) − F (0, λ1 ) .

(5.61)

If, instead of λ, the dimensionless variable x from (5.53) is introduced, then F (0, λ) can be represented as a function only of x: 15 λT )= 4 F (0, x) = F (0, c2 π

x 0

dx , x5 (e1/x − 1)

(5.62)

Fig. 5.28. As x and λT only diﬀer by the radiation constant c2 , the function F (0, λT ) is used for applications. For λmax T according to (5.52) this gives F (0, λmax T ) = 0.250 05. Therefore, just over a quarter of the emissive power of a black body falls in the wavelength region λ ≤ λmax , at all temperatures.

Fig. 5.28: Function F (0, λT /c2 ) from (5.62) versus x = λT /c2

The analytical representation of the integral (5.62) is possible by integrating a series expansion of the integrand. With y = 1/x = c2 /λT we obtain, for all y, the convergent series F (0, y) =

∞ 15 e−my {[(my + 3)my + 6] my + 6} . π 4 m=1 m4

For y < 2 it is more convenient to use the series 15 y2 y4 y6 y8 1 y F (0, y) = 1 − 4 y 3 − + − + − +··· , π 3 8 60 5040 272160 13305600 cf. [5.15], [5.16].

5.3 Radiation properties of real bodies

579

Example 5.3: The sun can be approximated as a radiating sphere of radius RS = 6.96 · 108 m. The distance between the earth and the sun is DES = 1.496 · 1011 m. At this distance, the irradiance on an area normal to the sun and at the outer edge of the earth’s atmosphere has a value of E0 = 1367 W/m2 , that is known as the solar constant. The extraterrestrial solar radiation shall be considered to be black body radiation. Under these assumptions determine the emissive power MS of the sun and its surface temperature TS . What proportion of the radiation leaving the sun falls within the region of visible light (0.38 μm ≤ λ ≤ 0.78 μm)? The radiative power emitted by the sun is ΦS = 4πRS2 MS (TS ) . This radiative power also penetrates an (imaginary) spherical surface lying at a distance DES concentric around the sun, Fig. 5.29. Fig. 5.29: Geometry of the sunearth system (not to scale) and schematic representation of the irradiation of a surface element dA at a distance DES from the centre of the sun, RS radius of sun

So, it holds that 2 ΦS = 4πDES E0

with E0 as the solar constant. This gives the emissive power of the sun as MS (TS ) =

DES RS

2 E0 = 63.16

MW . m2

A black body with this emissive power has, according to the Stefan-Boltzmann law, a temperature of TS =

MS σ

1/4

=

DES RS

1/2

E0 σ

1/4 = 5777 K .

As a ﬁrst approach, extraterrestrial solar radiation can be taken to be radiation from a black body at this temperature, see also section 5.3.5. The proportion of the radiation emitted by this black body within the wavelength interval λ1 = 0.38 μm to λ2 = 0.78 μm, according to (5.61) and (5.62), is F (λ1 , λ2 ) = F (0, λ2 TS ) − F (0, λ1 TS ) . For λ2 TS = 4506 μm K and λ1 TS = 2195 μm K F (λ1 , λ2 ) = 0.5652 − 0.1000 = 0.4652 is found from Table 5.3 as an approximate value for the proportion of the solar radiation in the visible wavelength region.

580

5.3

5 Thermal radiation

Radiation properties of real bodies

In the following sections we will look at the radiation properties of real bodies, which, with respect to the directional dependence and the spectral distribution of the radiated energy, are vastly diﬀerent from the properties of the black body. In order to record these deviations the emissivity of a real radiator is deﬁned. Kirchhoﬀ’s law links the emissivity with the absorptivity and suggests the introduction of a “semi-ideal” radiator, the diﬀuse radiating grey body, that is frequently used as an approximation in radiative transfer calculations. In the treatment of the emissivities of real radiators we will use the results from the classical electromagnetic theory of radiation. In the last section the properties of transparent bodies, (e.g. glass) will be dealt with.

5.3.1

Emissivities

According to Kirchhoﬀ’s law a black body emits the maximum radiation energy at every wavelength in every direction in the hemisphere. It therefore suggests itself to relate the four radiation quantities, used to characterise the emission of any radiator in 5.1.2, to their maximum values, namely the corresponding quantities for a black body at the same temperature. This leads to the deﬁnition of four dimensionless quantities that are smaller than one and are called emissivities. These four emissivities are material properties of the radiation emitting body. The deﬁnitions of the four emissivities are brought together in Table 5.4. It additionally contains the relationships which are used in the calculation of the other three emissivities from the directional spectral emissivity ελ(λ, β, ϕ, T ). This emissivity describes the directional and wavelength distributions of the emitted radiation ﬂow, whilst the hemispherical spectral emissivity ελ (λ, T ) only gives the spectral energy distribution. The directional total emissivity ε (β, ϕ, T ) only describes the distribution over the solid angles in the hemisphere. In contrast, the hemispherical total emissivity ε(T ) — normally just called the emissivity — does not have a distribution function character. It merely gives the temperature dependent factor by which the emissive power M (T ) of a real body is smaller than the emissive power Ms (T ) of a black body at the same temperature. The following relationships for the four radiation quantities for emission from a real body are obtained from the deﬁning equations for the emissivities. The body’s spectral intensity Lλ is Lλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) = ελ (λ, β, ϕ, T )Lλs (λ, T ) ,

(5.63)

where the spectral intensity Lλs of the black body is given by Planck’s function according to (5.50). As the black body is a Lambert radiator, ελ alone covers the deviations of the real emission from Lambert’s cosine law. This also applies to

5.3 Radiation properties of real bodies

581

the directional total emissivity ε (β, ϕ, T ), with which the intensity L of the real body is expressed by σ (5.64) L(β, ϕ, T ) = ε (β, ϕ, T )Ls (T ) = ε (β, ϕ, T ) T 4 , π In general, the directional emissivities ελ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) and ε (β, ϕ, T ) do not depend on the circumferential angle ϕ. Integration over all solid angles in the hemisphere, which, according to Table 5.4, leads from ελ to ελ and from ε to ε, is then simpliﬁed. This produces ελ (λ, T ) =

1 π

2π π/2

ελ (λ, β, T ) cos β sin β dβ dϕ = 2

ϕ=0 β=0

π/2

ελ (λ, β, T ) cos β sin β dβ .

(5.65)

β=0

Table 5.4: Deﬁnitions of the emissivities and the relationships existing between them

Directional spectral emissivity ελ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) :=

Lλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) Lλs (λ, T )

ελ describes the directional and wavelength distribution of the emitted radiation ﬂow by comparing the spectral intensity Lλ with that of a black body.

Hemispherical spectral emissivity ελ (λ, T ) := ελ (λ, T ) =

Mλ (λ, T ) Mλs (λ, T )

1 ε (λ, β, ϕ, T ) cos β dω π λ

ελ describes the wavelength distribution of the radiative power emitted in the hemisphere by comparison of the hemispherical spectral emissive power Mλ with that of a black body.

Directional total emissivity L(β, ϕ, T ) π L(β, ϕ, T ) = Ls (T ) σT 4 ∞ 1 ε (β, ϕ, T ) = ελ (λ, β, ϕ, T )Lλs (λ, T ) dλ Ls (T ) ε (β, ϕ, T ) :=

0

ε describes the directional distribution of the emitted radiation ﬂow of all wavelengths by comparison of the total intensity L with that of a black body.

Hemispherical total emissivity M (T ) M (T ) = Ms (T ) σT 4 ∞ 1 1 ε(T ) = ελ (λ, T )Mλs (λ, T ) dλ = ε (β, ϕ, T ) cos β dω Ms (T ) π ε(T ) :=

0

ε compares the emissive power M with that of a black body.

582

5 Thermal radiation

Fig. 5.30: Hemispherical spectral emissive power Mλ (λ, T ) of a real body compared to the hemispherical spectral emissive power Mλs (λ, T ) of a black body at the same temperature. The hatched area represents the emissive power M (T ) of the real body and likewise

π/2 ε(T ) = 2

ε (β, T ) cos β sin β dβ .

(5.66)

β=0

It holds for the hemispherical spectral emissive power of a real body that Mλ (λ, T ) = ελ (λ, T )Mλs (λ, T ) ,

(5.67)

where the hemispherical spectral emissive power Mλs of a black body is given by (5.50). Fig. 5.30 illustrates (5.67) for a given temperature. Every ordinate of Mλs (λ, T ) is reduced by a factor of ελ (λ, T ). The hatched area corresponds to the emissive power of the real body, since it holds that ∞ M (T ) =

∞ ελ (λ, T )Mλs (λ, T ) dλ = ε(T )Ms (T ) = ε(T )σT 4 .

Mλ (λ, T ) dλ = 0

0

(5.68)

5.3.2

The relationships between emissivity, absorptivity and reﬂectivity. The grey Lambert radiator

5.3.2.1

Conclusions from Kirchhoﬀ ’s law

Kirchhoﬀ’s law shows that a close relationship exists between the emission and absorption capabilities of a body, see 5.1.6. From (5.48) we obtained the following equation for the spectral intensity of any body Lλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) = aλ(λ, β, ϕ, T )Lλs (λ, T ) as a quantitative expression of Kirchhoﬀ’s law. Here, the directional spectral absorptivity aλ is a material property that characterises the absorption capability of the body. The comparison of this relationship with (5.63) yields aλ(λ, β, ϕ, T ) = ελ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) .

(5.69)

5.3 Radiation properties of real bodies

583

The directional spectral absorptivity of a any radiator agrees with its directional spectral emissivity. The directional spectral reﬂectivity rλ of an opaque body can also be traced back to the directional spectral emissivity ελ. According to (5.41) and (5.69), it holds that rλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) = 1 − aλ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) = 1 − ελ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) .

(5.70)

This says that one single material function is suﬃcient for the description of the emission, absorption and reﬂective capabilities of an opaque body. Table 5.4 shows that it is possible to calculate the emissivities ελ , ε and ε from ελ . Correspondingly, with known incident spectral intensity Kλ of the incident radiation, this also holds for the calculation of aλ, a and a from aλ as well as of rλ , r and r from rλ , cf. Tables 5.1 and 5.2. So, only one single material function, e.g. ελ = ελ (λ, β, ϕ, T ), is actually necessary to record all the radiation properties of a real body6 . This is an example of how the laws of thermodynamics limit the number of possible material functions (equations of state) of a system.

5.3.2.2

Calculation of absorptivities from emissivities

The equality resulting from Kirchhoﬀ’s law between the directional spectral absorptivity and the emissivity, aλ = ελ , suggests that investigation of whether the other three (integrated) absorptivities aλ , a and a can be calculated from the corresponding emissivities ελ , ε and ε should be carried out. This will be impossible without additional assumptions, as the absorptivities aλ , a and a are not alone material properties of the absorbing body, they also depend on the incident spectral intensity Kλ of the incident radiation, see Table 5.1. The emissivities ελ , ε and ε are, in contrast, purely material properties. An accurate test is therefore required to see whether, and under what conditions, the equations analogous to (5.69), aλ = ελ , a = ε and a = ε are valid. If the hemispherical spectral absorptivity and emissivity shall agree, aλ (λ, T ) = ελ (λ, T ), then according to Table 5.1 and 5.4 the equation 1 1 ελ (λ, β, ϕ, T )Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) cos β dω = ε (λ, β, ϕ, T ) cos β dω Eλ (λ) πλ

(5.71)

has to be satisﬁed. On the left hand side, according to Kirchhoﬀ’s law, aλ was replaced by ελ . Equation (5.71) is only satisﬁed in two cases: 1. The body has a diﬀuse radiating surface (Lambert radiator); then ελ = ελ (λ, T ) is valid. 2. Diﬀuse irradiation with Kλ = Kλ (λ) is present, see section 5.1.3. 6

However, this is valid with the restriction that the bidirectional reﬂectivities are not covered, which describe the directional distribution of the reﬂected radiation; see for this the comments in 5.1.5 as well as [5.4], p. 71 ﬀ.

584

5 Thermal radiation

If the directional total absorptivity a equals the directional total emissivity, a (β, ϕ, T ) = ε (β, ϕ, T ), then according to Tables 5.1 and 5.4 1 K(β, ϕ)

∞ 0

ελ (λ, β, ϕ, T )Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) dλ =

1 Ls (T )

∞

ελ (λ, β, ϕ, T )Lλs (λ, T ) dλ

(5.72)

0

must hold. Once again, this is only possible in two cases: 1. The directional spectral emissivity is independent of the wavelength λ: ελ = ελ (β, ϕ, T ). A body with this property is called a grey body or a grey radiator. 2. The incident radiation satisﬁes the condition Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) = C(β, ϕ) · Lλs (λ, T ), where the factor C does not depend on λ. Finally, it remains to investigate under which conditions the hemispherical total quantities a and ε are the same, such that a(T ) = ε(T ) can be stated. According to Tables 5.1 and 5.4, the equation ∞ ⎤ ⎡ ελ (λ, β, ϕ, T )Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) dλ cos β dω ∞ 0 1 ⎣ = ελ (λ, β, ϕ, T )Lλs (λ, T ) dλ⎦ cos β dω ∞ Ms (T ) 0 Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) dλ cos β dω 0 (5.73) has to be satisﬁed. This is possible in four cases: 1. The body is both a diﬀuse and grey radiator: ελ = ελ (T ). 2. The body is a diﬀuse radiator, ελ = ελ (λ, T ), and the spectral irradiance Kλ of the radiation has a wavelength dependence like black body radiation at the temperature of the absorbing body: Kλ (λ, β, ϕ) = C(β, ϕ) · Lλs (λ, T ). 3. The body is a grey radiator, ελ = ελ (β, ϕ, T ), and Kλ is independent of the direction (diﬀuse irradiation), Kλ = Kλ (λ). 4. The body has any radiation properties. The spectral irradiance Kλ is independent of direction and is proportional to the spectral intensity of a black body at the temperature of the absorbing surface: Kλ = C · Lλs (λ, T ). The proof of the correctness of these conditions, under which the equations (5.71) to (5.73) hold, is left to the reader.

The equality of the three pairs of absorptivities and emissivities, namely aλ (λ, T ) = ελ(λ, T ), a (β, ϕ, T ) = ε (β, ϕ, T ) and a(T ) = ε(T ), is only given if the absorbing and emitting surfaces have particular properties, or if the incident spectral intensity Kλ of the radiation satisﬁes certain conditions in terms of its directional and wavelength dependency. These conditions are satisﬁed by incident black body radiation, when the black body is at the same temperature as the absorbing body, which does not apply for heat transfer. In practice, the more important cases are those in which the directional spectral emissivity ελ of the absorbing body at least approximately satisﬁes special conditions. We will once again summarise these conditions:

5.3 Radiation properties of real bodies

585

1. When ελ = ελ(λ, T ), (diﬀuse radiating surface), it holds that aλ(λ, T ) = ελ (λ, T ) = ελ (λ, T ) .

(5.74)

2. When ελ = ελ(β, ϕ, T ), (grey radiating surface), it holds that a (β, ϕ, T ) = ε (β, ϕ, T ) = ελ(β, ϕ, T ) .

(5.75)

3. When ελ = ελ(T ), (diﬀuse and grey emitting surface), it holds that a(T ) = ε(T ) = ελ(T ) .

(5.76)

If the conditions mentioned above for ελ are satisﬁed, then (5.74) to (5.76) are valid for incident radiation with any incident spectral intensity Kλ . 5.3.2.3

The grey Lambert radiator

In radiative exchange calculations, it is preferable to use the model, described in the previous section, of a grey, diﬀuse radiating body as a simple approximation for the radiative behaviour of real bodies. As Lambert’s cosine law is valid for this model, we denote these bodies as grey Lambert radiators.

Fig. 5.31: Hemispherical spectral emissive power Mλ (λ, T ) = ε(T )Mλs (λ, T ) of a grey Lambert radiator at a certain temperature

The energy radiated from them is distributed like that from a black body over the directions in the hemisphere and the spectrum; yet the spectral emissive power Mλ (λ, T ) and the spectral intensity Lλ (λ, T ) are smaller by the purely temperature dependent emissivity ε(T ) than the corresponding functions for a black body, Fig. 5.31: Mλ(λ, T ) = πLλ (λ, T ) = ε(T )Mλs (λ, T ) .

(5.77)

Here, Mλs (λ, T ) is the Planck function according to (5.50). The emissivity ε(T ) is the only material function of a grey Lambert radiator; all four emissivities are equal and the same as the four absorptivities: ε(T ) = ε (T ) = ελ (T ) = ελ (T ) = aλ(T ) = aλ (T ) = a (T ) = a(T ) .

(5.78)

Real bodies are often approximate Lambert radiators. In contrast, ελ and ελ are, in general, highly dependent on the wavelength. The assumption of a

586

5 Thermal radiation

grey radiating surface no longer applies. However it is a good approximation, if the wavelength region with signiﬁcant spectral emissive power Mλ and spectral irradiance Eλ lies in a wavelength interval in which ελ is roughly constant. This is illustrated in Fig. 5.32, where is is assumed that at small wavelengths radiation is neither emitted, incident nor absorbed. This applies to radiation sources that are at not too high temperatures. However if solar radiation, with a maximum lying at small wavelengths λ < λ1 , falls on the body under consideration in Fig. 5.32, then a = ε; the assumption of a grey body is now incorrect, so special absorptivities aS for solar radiation have to be used, cf. section 5.4.5.

Fig. 5.32: Approximately constant spectral emissivity ελ for λ > λ1 as well as the pattern of the hemispherical spectral emissive power Mλ and the spectral irradiance Eλ , such that a grey radiator can be assumed Example 5.4: A material has a directional spectral emissivity that only depends on the polar angle β: ελ (λ, β, ϕ, T ) = ε (β). This directional dependence is given by ε1 = 0.20 for 0 ≤ β < π/4 ε (β) = . ε2 = 0.50 for π/4 ≤ β ≤ π/2 The external skin of a satellite is made of this material and is exposed to solar radiation 2 with a ﬂux density q˙sol = 1500 W/m . What temperature does the surface of the satellite assume, when it is hit perpendicularly by the solar radiation? What temperature develops when the surface forms an angle of π/6 = 30◦ with the direction of the solar radiation? A heat ﬂow between the surface and the inside of the satellite can be neglected; the temperature of space may be assumed to be TW = 0 K. Under the assumptions given, the emissive power M (T ) = εσT 4 of the satellite surface has to be equal to the energy ﬂux q˙abs that it absorbs from the incident solar radiation: εσT 4 = q˙abs = a (β)E = ε (β) q˙sol cos β . Here, (5.75) has been used because a grey radiator (ελ independent of λ) is present. The temperature T of the satellite surface will then be 4 ε (β) q˙sol cos β T = . (5.79) εσ In this equation, ε is the hemispherical total emissivity, calculated according to (5.66). This gives π/4 π/2 ε = 2 ε1 cos β sin β dβ + 2 ε2 cos β sin β dβ . 0

π/4

5.3 Radiation properties of real bodies

587

The two integrals each have a value of 1/4, yielding ε = 12 (ε1 + ε2 ) = 0.35. For perpendicularly falling radiation, β = 0, the temperature obtained from (5.79) is T = 351 K. When the surface and the direction of the solar radiation form an angle of π/6, the polar angle is β = π/2 − π/6 = π/3. The directional emissivity ε (β), decisive for the absorption, now assumes the large value of ε2 , whilst the irradiance is reduced by a factor of cos β = cos(π/3) = 0.5. The two eﬀects partly compensate each other, such that (5.79) delivers the only slightly higher surface temperature of T = 371 K.

5.3.3

Emissivities of real bodies

According to 5.3.2.1, the radiation properties of an opaque body are determined by its directional spectral emissivity ελ = ελ (λ, β, ϕ, T ). In order to determine this material function experimentally numerous measurements are required, as the dependence on the wavelength, direction and temperature all have to be investigated. These extensive measurements have, so far, not been carried out for any substance. Measurements are frequently limited to the determination of the emissivity ελ,n normal to the surface (β = 0), the emissivities for a few chosen wavelengths or only the hemispherical total emissivity ε is measured. In addition to incomplete radiation measurements, the strong dependence of the results on the condition of the surface is a further diﬃculty. Impurities also play a role, alongside roughness. Even a very thin ﬁlm of water or an oxide layer can completely change the radiation behaviour compared to the base material alone. It is therefore no surprise that the emissivities measured by various researchers often diﬀer signiﬁcantly. Unfortunately, in the description of the experiments the surface properties were inexactly or incompletely characterised, which frequently occurs due to the lack of quantitative measures for surface properties. The emissivities presented in Tables B12 and B13 of the Appendix must therefore be taken to be relatively uncertain. In view of the experimental diﬃculties a theory for radiation properties is desirable. The classical theory of electromagnetic waves from J.C. Maxwell (1864), links the emissivity ελ with the so-called optical constants of the material, the refractive index n and the extinction coeﬃcient k, that can be combined into a complex refractive index n ¯ = n − ik. The optical “constants” depend on the temperature, the wavelength and electrical properties, in particular the electrical resistivity re of the material. In addition, the theory delivers, in the form of Fresnel’s equations, an explicit dependence of the emissivity on the polar angle β, whilst no dependence on the circumferential angle ϕ appears, as isotropy has been assumed. Unfortunately the electromagnetic theory is only valid under a series of limiting suppositions, so that the emissivities calculated from it frequently diﬀer from reality. Despite this, it provides important, qualitative statements that can be used for the extrapolation from measurements or to estimate for missing data. We will not discuss the electromagnetic theory, see for this [5.4], but will use

588

5 Thermal radiation

some of its results in the treatment of emissivities of electrical insulators and electrical conductors (metals). These two material groups diﬀer signiﬁcantly in their radiation behaviour. 5.3.3.1

Electrical insulators

Materials that do not conduct electricity include construction materials, paints, oxide layers on metals and most liquids. For the application of electromagnetic theory they are idealised by the assumption that their speciﬁc electrical resistance is re → ∞. These substances are called dielectrics. Their extinction coeﬃcient k is zero; their refractive index is yielded, according to √ (5.80) n = μr γ r from their magnetic permeability μr and their electrical permittivity γr . In a vacuum both quantities are equal to one, so n = 1. The refractive indices of most dielectrics lie between n = 1 and n = 3. According to theory, the spectral emissivity ελ,n normal to the surface simply depends on the refractive index as follows ελ,n =

4n . (n + 1)2

(5.81)

Fig. 5.33: Directional spectral emissivity ελ (β, n) of electrical insulators according to (5.82) in a polar diagram

The complicated dependence ελ = ελ (β, n) on the polar angle β is illustrated in Fig. 5.33, a polar diagram. According to that and (5.81) high emissivities, over 0.8, would be expected for insulators, which is conﬁrmed by the data presented in Table B12. In Fig. 5.33 lines n = const run almost circular up to large polar angles β. Therefore Lambert’s cosine law holds in good approximation; dielectrics can be treated like diﬀuse radiators. Measurements from E. Schmidt [5.17] as well

5.3 Radiation properties of real bodies

589

Fig. 5.34: Directional spectral emissivity ελ (λ, β ≈ 0) as a function of wavelength for various insulators, according to measurements by W. Sieber [5.19]. a white paint on wood, b oak wood (smoothed), c white tiles (glazed), d concrete

as from E. Schmidt and E. Eckert [5.18] essentially conﬁrm the dependence of the emissivity on the polar angle β, as illustrated in Fig. 5.33. The electromagnetic theory makes no explicit statements about the wavelength dependence of n. The high emissivities expected from (5.81) and Fig. 5.33 were only observed in radiation measurements at large wavelengths, around λ > 2 μm. This is shown in Fig. 5.34, in which ελ (λ, β ≈ 0) according to measurements by W. Sieber [5.19] is illustrated. In the regions of large wavelengths important in practice, as a ﬁrst approximation, ελ does not depend on λ; we can put ε ≈ ελ and ε ≈ ελ , if the temperature is low enough such that the emission at wavelengths below around 2 μm does not deliver any meaningful contribution. Dielectrics are approximate grey radiators. Since frequently only the emissivity εn or ελ,n normal to the surface are determined in radiation experiments, and because the hemispherical total emissivity ε is required for radiative exchange calculations, the ratio ε/εn is of interest. For dielectrics, we can put ε/εn ≈ ελ (n) /ελ,n (n) , so that the ratio can be calculated from the electromagnetic theory equations. It is presented in Tab. 5.5, and illustrated in Fig. 5.35. As Lambert’s cosine law is roughly satisﬁed, ε/εn only deviates slightly from one. The equation of electromagnetic theory, upon which Fig. 5.33 is based, is n2 2a cos β 1 + ελ (β, n) = 2 2 (a + cos β) a cos β + sin2 β

(5.82)

with a = (n2 −sin2 β)1/2 , cf. [5.20]. By integration of ελ from (5.66), the hemispherical emissivity ελ can be found, which, according to theory only depends on the refractive index n from (5.80).

590

5 Thermal radiation

Table 5.5: Hemispherical (spectral) emissivity ελ , ratio ελ /ελ,n and refractive index n as functions of the directional (spectral) emissivity ελ,n normal to the surface for electrical nonconductors according to electromagnetic theory. The ratio ελ /ελ,n can be set equal to ε/εn . ελ,n

ελ

ελ /ελ,n

n

ελ,n

ελ

ελ /ελ,n

n

ελ,n

ελ

ελ /ελ,n

n

0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75

0.5142 0.5575 0.5999 0.6417 0.6829 0.7238

1.0284 1.0136 0.9999 0.9872 0.9756 0.9651

5.8284 5.0757 4.4415 3.8973 3.4221 3.0000

0.80 0.82 0.84 0.86 0.88 0.90

0.7647 0.7812 0.7978 0.8146 0.8317 0.8492

0.9559 0.9526 0.9497 0.9472 0.9451 0.9436

2.6180 2.4738 2.3333 2.1957 2.0600 1.9249

0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 0.99 1.00

0.8675 0.8868 0.9082 0.9342 0.9518 1.0000

0.9429 0.9434 0.9461 0.9532 0.9615 1.0000

1.7888 1.6488 1.5000 1.3294 1.2222 1.0000

Fig. 5.35: Ratio ε/εn of the hemispherical total emissivity ε to the emissivity εn normal to the surface as a function of εn . Right hand line: Dielectrics from Table 5.5, left hand line: Metals from Table 5.6. Circles: data from [5.18] R.V. Dunkle [5.21] carried out this integration with the result 2 1 (3n + 1) (n − 1) n2 n2 − 1 n+1 + ελ (n) = − 2 3 ln 2 n−1 6 (n + 1) (n2 + 1) 2n3 n2 + 2n − 1 8n4 n4 + 1 + 2 ln n . − (n + 1) (n4 − 1) (n2 + 1) (n4 − 1)2

(5.83)

Through division by ελ,n from (5.81) the values in Tab. 5.5 and Fig. 5.33 were obtained, which can be interpreted as ε/εn .

5.3.3.2

Electrical conductors (metals)

In contrast to dielectrics, the electromagnetic waves that penetrate metals are damped; the extinction coeﬃcient k in the complex refractive index n ¯ = n − ik

5.3 Radiation properties of real bodies

591

is not equal to zero, but generally greater than n. For the spectral emissivity ελ,n normal to the surface, the electromagnetic theory delivers the relationship ελ,n (n, k) =

4n . (n + 1)2 + k2

(5.84)

According to this, with metals, signiﬁcantly smaller emissivities than those for electrical insulators are to be expected. At large wavelengths, around λ > 5 μm, and small electrical resistivity re , the radiation properties of metals can be described by a simpliﬁed version of electromagnetic wave theory, which goes back to P. Drude [5.22]. It is also linked with the names E. Hagen and H. Rubens, who checked its applicability by experiment [5.23]. According to this theory n and k assume large values, and it holds that c 0 μ0 λ R0 λ n=k= = . (5.85) 4π re re Here, c0 is the velocity of light in a vacuum and μ0 = 4π · 10−7 N/A2 is the magnetic ﬁeld constant. These universal constants yield an electrical resistance of R0 = c0 μ0 /4π = 29.979 Ω. According to Drude’s theory, ελ only depends on the polar angle β and n from (5.85), cf. Fig. 5.36. At polar angles larger than 80◦ , ελ assumes a distinct maximum; Lambert’s cosine law is not fulﬁlled; metals cannot be treated as diﬀuse radiators. The ratio ε/εn illustrated in Fig. 5.35, is therefore considerably larger than one. Measurements by E. Schmidt and E. Eckert [5.18] conﬁrm qualitatively the wavelength dependence of ελ shown in Fig. 5.36.

Fig. 5.36: Directional spectral emissivity ελ (β, n) of metals according to the simpliﬁed electromagnetic theory, eq. (5.87)

As the refractive index n from (5.85) depends on the wavelength λ, this also applies to ελ . At large wavelengths, the spectral emissivity of metals falls with increasing λ. Metals can therefore, not be viewed as grey radiators, so a(T ) = ε(T ) cannot be used. According to E. Eckert [5.24], the following holds for the

592

5 Thermal radiation

absorptivity a of a metal surface at temperature T for incident black or grey radiation from a source at temperature T ∗ √ a = ε( T · T ∗ ) .

(5.86)

However, this relationship is only correct when T ∗ is so low that the portion of the incident radiation in the region λ < 5 μm can be neglected. According to Drude’s theory, the directional spectral emissivity ελ of metals, see [5.4], is found to be 1 1 ελ (β, n) = 2n cos β . (5.87) 2 2 + 2 2 (n cos β) + (1 + n cos β) n + (n + cos β) Fig. 5.36 is based on this equation. By integrating (5.87) corresponding to (5.66), gives the spectral emissivity that is only dependent on n 1 1 2 2 1 ελ (n) = 4n + − 4n2 + 2 ln 1 + + 2 − 2 ln (2n) . (5.88) n n n 2n n As Drude’s theory is only applicable for large n, ελ (n) is developed into a power series of (1/n). With (5.85), the numerical value equations valid for re in Ωcm and λ in μm follow as re re re re − 166.78 1 + 31.62 + 6.849 ln ελ = 48.70 λ λ λ λ (5.89) r 2 r 5/2 e e + 3973.8 − 47628 +··· , λ λ valid for re /λ < 5 · 10−4 Ωcm/μm. According to that, at large wavelengths, ελ decreases proportionally to λ−1/2 . The electrical resistivity re increases with rising temperature, such that ελ goes up with T . However, this only holds at large wavelengths; at small wavelengths Drude’s theory fails, and a fall in ελ with rising temperature is observed. In order to obtain the hemispherical total emissivity ε(T ) from ελ , according to Table 5.4 ελ has to be multiplied by Mλs and integrated over all wavelengths. This yields the numerical value equation (for re in Ωcm and T in K)

3/2 ε (T ) = 0, 7671 re T − (0.3091 − 0.08884 ln re T ) (re T ) − 0.02334 (re T ) +3.50 · 10−4 (re T )5/2 − 8.7 · 10−5 (re T )3 + · · · ,

(5.90)

valid for re T < 1.2 ΩcmK. As Drude’s theory is invalid at small wavelengths, the integration of ελ · Mλs still begins at λ = 0, then (5.90) is only applicable at such low temperatures that the contribution of small wavelengths to ε is negligible. In general, this is the case for T < 550 K. Finally ελ,n from (5.84) with k = n can be developed into a power series of (1/n) and by integrating over all wavelengths, the total emissivity εn normal to the surface can be calculated to be √ 3/2 εn (T ) = 0.5753 re T − 0.1777 (re T ) + 0.0292 (re T ) . (5.91) 5/2 3 −0.00184 (re T ) + 0.000712 (re T ) − · · · The values given in Table 5.6 for ε/εn , which are also illustrated in Fig. 5.35 are obtained from (5.90) and (5.91).

5.3 Radiation properties of real bodies

593

Table 5.6: Hemispherical total emissivity ε, ratio ε/εn and product re T as functions of the (directional) total emissivity εn normal to the surface, for metals, calculated according to the simpliﬁed electromagnetic theory (n = k) εn

ε

ε/εn

re T

εn

ε

ε/εn

5.3.4

0.0000 0.0258 0.0506 0.0745 0.0977 0.1203

1.333 1.292 1.264 1.242 1.221 1.203

0.00000 0.00123 0.00505 0.01163 0.02114 0.03384

εn

ε

ε/εn

ΩcmK

ΩcmK 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10

re T

0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.25

0.1424 0.1640 0.1852 0.2059 0.2263 0.2757

1.187 1.172 1.157 1.144 1.131 1.103

0.04992 0.06967 0.0934 0.1213 0.1537 0.2577

re T ΩcmK

0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45

0.3231 0.3688 0.4129 0.4555

1.077 1.054 1.032 1.012

0.3999 0.5904 0.8417 1.1722

Transparent bodies

Metals and most electrical insulators completely absorb incident radiation in a layer of only a few micrometres thickness close to the surface, so that they are opaque. Exceptions to this are formed by liquids and solids like glass and some minerals (rock salt, sylvite and ﬂuorite); these selectively let radiation through even at large thicknesses, namely in a limited wavelength band, mostly at small wavelengths in the visible part of the spectrum. In order to describe radiation transmitted by a body, the spectral transmissivity is deﬁned as τλ (λ, T ) := d2 Φin,tr /d2 Φin . (5.92) Here, just as in section 5.1.3 d2Φin = Eλ (λ) dλ dA is the radiation ﬂow, in the wavelength interval dλ, incident on an element dA of the surface of the body; d2 Φin,tr is the radiation ﬂow transmitted through the body. The spectral transmissivity τλ for every wavelength indicates the portion of the spectral irradiance Eλ that is allowed to pass through. With the spectral absorptivity aλ (λ, T ) from Table 5.1 and the spectral reﬂectivity rλ (λ, T ) from Table 5.2 the following balance is obtained rλ (λ, T ) + aλ (λ, T ) + τλ (λ, T ) = 1 .

(5.93)

Fig. 5.37 illustrates the transmissivity τλ of Jena-glass. Glass possesses a high transparency within a very limited interval at small wavelengths. This selective transparency provides the possibility of collecting solar energy through glass windows. A signiﬁcant proportion of the mostly short wave sunlight will be transmitted. Bodies located behind the window, which are at around ambient temperature, emit radiation at large wavelengths, where τλ assumes small values. This longwave radiation is not allowed to pass through the glass, but is mostly absorbed. This is what has become known as the greenhouse eﬀect. It is not

594

5 Thermal radiation

Fig. 5.37: Transmissivity τλ of a sheet of Jena-glass (colourless) of s = 1 mm thickness, taking into account the multireﬂections on the two surfaces at T ≈ 300 K

only used in plant nurseries, but also in collectors for the thermal use of solar energy, see [5.25]. A glass covering over the absorber surface of the collector allows solar radiation almost uninhibited through and at the same time reduces the undesirable release of heat by the collector to the surroundings. The absorptivity aλ and transmissivity τλ of a transparent body do not only depend on its capability for absorbing penetrating radiation, but also on its thickness s. In order to clarify these relationships, further material characteristics are used, which we will look at in the following, cf. also the German Norm DIN 1349 [5.26]. A body of thickness s is struck by radiation with a spectral irradiance Eλ (λ). From this, the spectral radiation ﬂow Φλ (0) = (1 − rλ ) Eλ (5.94) penetrates the body. Through absorption inside the body, the penetrated radiation ﬂow is reduced and reaches the smaller value Φλ (s) at the other surface. This weakening is covered by the spectral pure transmissivity, deﬁned by τi (λ, s) := Φλ (s) /Φλ (0) .

(5.95)

The index i indicates the weakening taking place inside the body. The portion of the penetrating radiation ﬂow absorbed in the body is described by the spectral pure absorptivity ai (λ, s) :=

Φλ (0) − Φλ (s) = 1 − τi (λ, s) . Φλ (0)

(5.96)

In order to separate the eﬀect of the body thickness s from its speciﬁc absorption capability, the spectral absorption coeﬃcient is deﬁned as κ (λ, s) :=

1 1 ln . s τi (λ, s)

(5.97)

For most materials κ does not depend on the layer thickness s, but is one of the material properties dependent on the wavelength: κ = κ(λ). We will presume this, getting τi (λ, s) = exp [−κ (λ) s] = 1 − ai (λ, s) .

(5.98)

The spectral pure transmissivity decreases exponentially with the thickness of the body. An opaque body of thickness s has such a large spectral absorption coeﬃcient that the product κ(λ)s reaches values over 7, then τi ≈ 0 and ai ≈ 1.

5.3 Radiation properties of real bodies

595

Table 5.7: Spectral absorption coeﬃcient κλ of water according to [5.27] λ μm

κλ cm−1

λ μm

κλ cm−1

λ μm

κλ cm−1

λ μm

κλ cm−1

λ μm

κλ cm−1

0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40

0.0691 0.0168 0.0067 0.0023 0.00058

0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90

0.0060 0.0261 0.0196 0.0433 0.0679

1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6

8.03 69.1 16.5 50.1 153.0

3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6

112.0 145.0 206.0 294.0 402.0

7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0

5740 5460 5390 5430 5570

0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65

0.00029 0.00025 0.000045 0.0023 0.0032

0.95 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6

4.8 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5

393.0 312.0 265.0 2240.0 758.0

9.5 10.0

5870 6380

0.388 0.363 1.04 12.4 6.72

2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6

5160.0 11400.0 3630.0 721.0 180.0

In Table 5.7 the spectral absorption coeﬃcient of water is exhibited. At wavelengths in the visible part of the spectrum, κ(λ) is very small. This gives, for λ = 0.5 μm and s = 1.0 m τi = exp −0.00025 cm−1 · 1.0 m = 0.975 . The water layer transmits short wave radiation almost completely unweakened. This does not hold for wavelengths λ ≥ 0.95 μm. Here τi will be immeasurably small for s = 1.0 m. As the sun, according to Example 5.3, mainly radiates in a region of short wavelengths, 36% of the total solar radiation penetrating the water will still pass through it to a depth of 1.0 m. In contrast, the mainly long wave radiation from earthly sources will already be completely absorbed in a water layer of around 2 mm thickness [5.17].

Fig. 5.38: Schematic of the radiation ﬂow in multiple reﬂection at the edges of a plate that allows radiation to pass through it The radiation allowed to pass through solid bodies, such as glass, is not only determined by the absorption internally, the multiple reﬂection at both surfaces also plays a role. The radiation ﬂows that appear in multiple reﬂections are schematically illustrated in Fig. 5.38. At each of the two edges the radiation ﬂow is divided by reﬂection into a reﬂected and a continuing part. The decisive reﬂectivity is known as the spectral Fresnel reﬂectivity r¯(λ) according to [5.26]. It is calculated from r¯(λ) = 1 − ελ with the directional spectral emissivity ελ from (5.82), if the body is bounded by a medium with the refractive index n = 1, that is, in a vacuum or in air. By each transmission from one edge to the other, the radiation ﬂow is weakened by the factor τi . This gives the proportions drawn in Fig. 5.38 for the continuing and reﬂected fractions of an incident radiation ﬂow set equal to one. Addition of all transmitted radiation ﬂows gives 2 τλ = (1 − r¯) τi 1 + r¯2 τi2 + r¯4 τi4 + · · ·

596

5 Thermal radiation

or τλ =

(1 − r¯)2 τi . 1 − r¯2 τi2

(5.99)

Addition of the reﬂected radiation ﬂows produces the spectral reﬂectivity 2 rλ = r¯ + r¯ (1 − r¯) τi2 1 + r¯2 τi2 + r¯4 τi4 + · · ·

or

2

rλ = r¯ 1 +

(1 − r¯) τi2 1 − r¯2 τi2

.

(5.100)

The multiple reﬂections increase rλ compared to r¯ and reduce τλ compared to τi . The fraction of radiation absorbed in the body can be calculated from (5.93). The spectral absorptivity is obtained as (1 − r¯) τi aλ = (1 − r¯) 1 − ; (5.101) 1 − r¯τi it is smaller than the pure absorptivity ai = 1 − τi . For many electrical insulators, in particular for glass with n = 1.5, for polar angles β < 60◦ , Fresnel’s reﬂectivity is r¯ < 0.1. Then 1 − r¯2 τi2 = 1 − r¯2 may be used, which has an error of less than 1%, giving from (5.99) τλ ≈

1 − r¯ τ . 1 + r¯ i

(5.102)

The transmissivity τλ of glass, illustrated in Fig. 5.37, reaches a maximum value of 0.88. With a refractive index n = 1.55, this yields, from (5.81), for perpendicular incident radiation, r¯ = (n − 1)2 /(n + 1)2 = 0.0465. This then gives, from (5.101) a pure transmissivity τi = 0.97. In the region of the maximum of τλ , glass is almost completely transparent; the reduction of τλ compared to the highest value τλ = 1 can mainly be put down to the reﬂection on the two edges of the sheet of glass. Example 5.5: The spectral transmissivity of by ⎧ for ⎨ 0 0.86 for τλ = ⎩ 0.03 for

a 2.0 mm thick glass sheet is approximated λ < λ1 λ1 ≤ λ ≤ λ2 λ > λ2

with λ1 = 0.35 μm and λ2 = 1.5 μm. Calculate the total transmissivity for perpendicularly incident solar radiation. The spectral irradiance Eλ (λ) shall be assumed to be proportional to the hemispherical spectral emissive power Mλs of a black body with T = TS = 5777 K, see Example 5.3. How large will τ be for a glass sheet with s = 4.0 mm and refractive index n = 1.52 ? The total transmissivity, in analogy to the total absorptivity a from Table 5.1, is given by ∞ τ=

0

∞

τλ (λ, T ) Eλ (λ) dλ ∞

= Eλ (λ) dλ

τλ (λ) Mλs (λ, TS ) dλ

0

σTS4

.

0

With the function F (0, λT ) from (5.62) and from Table 5.3 this gives τ = 0.86 [F (0, λ2 TS ) − F (0, λ1 TS )] + 0.03 [1 − F (0, λ2 TS )] . For λ1 TS = 2022 μmK and λ2 TS = 8665.5 μmK, we ﬁnd, from Table 5.3, F (0, λ1 TS ) = 0.0702 and F (0, λ2 TS ) = 0.8800. With that τ = 0.700. The glass sheet allows 70% of the incident solar radiation to pass through it.

5.4 Solar radiation

597

A doubling of the sheet thickness to s = 4.0 mm changes the spectral transmissivity τλ . Firstly, we will calculate the pure transmissivity τi for the glass sheet with 2.0 mm thickness. With n = 1.52 we obtain from (5.81) and r¯ = 1−ελ,n Fresnel’s reﬂectivity r¯ = (n−1)2 /(n+ 1)2 = 0.0426. As r¯ < 0.1, then τi can be calculated from (5.102): τi =

1 + r¯ τλ = 1.089 τλ . 1 − r¯

⎧ ⎨

This yields τi =

0 0.937 ⎩ 0.033

for λ < λ1 for λ1 ≤ λ ≤ λ2 for λ > λ2 .

With τi = exp[−κ(λ)s] from this we get, for s = 2.0 mm the spectral absorption coeﬃcients ⎧ ∞ for λ < λ1 ⎨ 0.328 cm−1 for λ1 ≤ λ ≤ λ2 κ= ⎩ 17.1 cm−1 for λ > λ2 . This then gives the pure transmissivity of ⎧ ⎨ 0 τi = 0.877 ⎩ 0.001

the thicker glass sheet s = 4.0 mm as for λ < λ1 for λ1 ≤ λ ≤ λ2 for λ > λ2

and ﬁnally the desired spectral transmissivity as ⎧ for λ < λ1 ⎨ 0 0.805 for λ1 ≤ λ ≤ λ2 τλ = ⎩ 0.001 for λ > λ2 . The total transmissivity is then τ = 0.805 [F (0, λ2 TS ) − F (0, λ1 TS )] + 0.001 [1 − F (0, λ2 TS )] = 0.652 . The glass sheet with double the thickness absorbs a somewhat larger part of the solar radiation, but still allows 65% of the incident radiation to pass through it compared to 70% with the thin sheet. The spectral reﬂectivity rλ of the thick sheet from (5.100) is ⎧ ⎨ 0.0426 for λ < λ1 0.0727 for λ1 ≤ λ ≤ λ2 rλ = ⎩ 0.0426 for λ > λ2 . It is increased between λ1 and λ2 by the multiple reﬂection at the edges, so that in total 6.7% instead of 4.26% of the solar energy is reﬂected.

5.4

Solar radiation

Without the radiation from the sun life on earth would be impossible; therefore the sun belongs to the most important radiation sources. The energetic use of the sun’s radiation is still very low; however in the future it will have a far greater importance, in order to gain energy for heating and endothermic reactions and to generate electrical energy in photovoltaic and solar-thermal power stations. The

598

5 Thermal radiation

following section does not contain a discussion on solar energy technology, further information can be found in [5.25] and [5.28] to [5.30]. We will, however, deal with the quantity and spectral distribution of the radiant energy provided by the sun and how it is weakened during its transmission through the earth’s atmosphere. This allows us to calculate the solar irradiance at the surface of the earth. We will conclude this section with consideration of the absorptivities for solar radiation. They diﬀer from the absorptivities for radiation from earthly sources because solar radiation is only incident at small wavelengths, namely below 4 μm and mainly in the region of visible light.

5.4.1

Extraterrestrial solar radiation

The sun is an almost spherical radiation source with a diameter of 1.392 · 106 km. It lies in one of the foci of the elliptical orbit of the earth. The solar radiation ﬂow, which reaches the earth is inversely proportional to the square of the distance r between the sun and the earth. The mean distance is r0 = 149.6 · 106 km; this distance is called one astronomical unit (AU)7 . The smallest distance lies at 0.983 AU and occurs on 3rd January, the largest separation between the sun and earth is 1.017 AU, this is reached on 4th July. The ratio required for radiation calculations, (r0 /r)2 is known as the eccentricity factor, and according to J.A. Duﬃe and W.A. Beckmann [5.29], can be calculated approximately from fex = (r0 /r)2 = 1 + 0.033 cos (2πdn /365) ,

(5.103)

where dn is the day number of the year, starting with dn = 1 on 1st January and ending with dn = 365 on 31st December. A more accurate relationship from J.W. Spencer [5.31] can be found in M. Iqbal [5.34]. The large distance between sun and earth means that solar radiation forms a quasi-parallel bundle of rays. The radiation that is not yet weakened by scattering and absorption in the earth’s atmosphere is called extraterrestrial radiation. If it is perpendicularly incident on a surface just outside the earth’s atmosphere, at a distance r0 = 1 AU from the centre of the sun then the irradiance of the extraterrestrial solar radiation is called the solar constant E0 . By evaluating more recent measurements, C. Fr¨ohlich and R.W. Brusa [5.33] determined the value E0 = (1367 ± 1.6) W/m2 , that was also accepted by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) in 1981 as the best value. With this value of E0 , the temperature TS = 5777 K in Example 5.3 was calculated. This would be the temperature at the surface of the sun if it radiated like a black body. 7

The exact value is 1AU = 149.597 870· 106 km. For the strict deﬁnition of the AU, see [5.32].

5.4 Solar radiation

599

Fig. 5.39: Extraterrestrial solar radiation on a surface, whose normal forms the polar angle βS with the direction of the solar rays

The irradiance of extraterrestrial radiation, that falls perpendicularly onto a surface that is at the same distance r as the earth is from the sun, is given by Ensol = E0 (r0 /r)2 = E0 fex

(5.104)

with fex from (5.103). If the direction of the sun’s rays forms the polar angle βS with the surface normal, Fig. 5.39, then the irradiance will be E sol = E0 fex cos βS .

(5.105)

The sun’s polar angle βS depends on the position and the orientation of the irradiated surface. This dependence is reproduced by trigonometric equations that can be found in books about solar radiation and its uses, e.g. in [5.30] and [5.34]. sol of extraterrestrial solar radiation, that falls perThe spectral irradiance Eλ,n pendicularly on a surface at a distance r0 = 1 AU from the sun, has been determined by several series of experiments using stratospheric aircraft. Their evaluation by C. Fr¨ohlich and C. Werli at the World Radiation Centre in Davos, Switzerland, yielded the spectrum reproduced in Fig. 5.40. The numerical values

sol Fig. 5.40: Spectral irradiance Eλ,n of extraterrestrial solar radiation falling perpendicularly on an area at a distance r0 = 1 AU from the sun

upon which this diagram is based can be found in M. Iqbal [5.34]. The maximum

600

5 Thermal radiation

sol of Eλ,n lies in the visible light region at λ ≈ 0.45 μm. 99 % of the irradiance falls in the wavelength band λ ≤ 3.8 μm. Fig. 5.40 also shows the spectral irradiance Eλ,s of the radiation emitted by a “black” sun at TS = 5777 K. The areas under the two curves (up to λ → ∞) are equal — they each yield the solar constant E0 —, but the spectrum of the extraterrestrial solar radiation deviates signiﬁcantly at some points, in particular at λ < 0.6 μm, from the spectrum of radiation from a black body.

Example 5.6: Determine the irradiance of extraterrestrial solar radiation on a horizontal area in Berlin (latitude ψ = 52.52◦ North, longitude ϕ = 13.35◦ East) on 1st September, 12.00 central European summertime. The irradiance E sol is given by (5.105), where the sun’s polar angle βS is still unknown. It holds for a horizontal surface, cf. [5.34], that cos βS = sin δ sin ψ + cos δ cos ψ cos ω .

(5.106)

The declination δ of the sun, for 1st September, that appears in this equation, can be taken from tables presented by M. Iqbal [5.34]: δ = 8.51◦ . The hour angle ω is calculated from the local solar time tS , according to ω = 15◦ (tS /h) . In the validity region of central European time tCET it holds that

8

tS = tCET − 12h + (ϕ/15◦ − 1) h . 12.00 hours central European summertime corresponds to tCET = 11.0 h. From this we get with ϕ = 13.35◦ as the degree of longitude of Berlin, tS = −1.11 h and ω = −16.65◦ . With these values, it follows from (5.106) that cos βS = 0.6940, i.e. βS = 46.05◦ . For 1st September, dn = 244. This then gives the eccentricity factor from (5.103) of fex = 0.9838. The irradiance of the extraterrestrial radiation is found to be E sol = E0 fex cos βS = 1367

5.4.2

W W 0.9838 · 0.6940 = 933 2 . m2 m

The attenuation of solar radiation in the earth’s atmosphere

The extraterrestrial solar radiation incident on the outer edge of the earth’s atmosphere is weakened as it travels through the atmosphere, so the solar irradiance at the surface of the earth is considerably lower than the extraterrestrial value from (5.105). Part of the incident radiant solar energy is removed from the bundle of rays by scattering on air molecules and aerosols; a further part is absorbed by the 8

This equation yields the mean local solar time. In order to obtain the actual (date dependent) local solar time, a small correction, the so-called equation of time has to be used. This correction amounts to only a few minutes.

5.4 Solar radiation

601

constituents of air. Around half of this scattered radiation reaches the ground in the form of so-called diﬀuse radiation, whilst the other half is radiated back into space, cf. Fig. 5.41. The radiation absorbed by molecules in the atmosphere raises the energy of the atmosphere which emits radiation itself. Part of this mostly long wave radiation reaches the ground and is known as atmospheric counter-radiation.

Fig. 5.41: Direct and diﬀuse solar radiation that passes through the atmosphere to the earth’s surface (schematic)

5.4.2.1

Spectral transmissivity

We are now going to calculate the attenuation of direct (directional) solar radiation through scattering and absorption in the atmosphere. The atmosphere is assumed to be cloudless; for details on the complicated eﬀect of clouds, [5.34] is suggested. We will consider a bundle of rays that goes through an optically turbid, namely absorbent and scattering medium, Fig. 5.42. The reduction dLλ of its spectral intensity Lλ according to the law from P. Bouguer9 , is proportional to the distance through which the radiation passes dl and the density of the scattering and absorbing particles: dLλ = −μ(λ, l) (l) dl . (5.107) Lλ It is assumed, according to the so-called Beer’s10 law, that the attenuation coeﬃcient μ is independent of the pathway. Integration between l and l0 gives l Lλ (l) = Lλ (l0 ) exp[−μ(λ) (l) dl] .

(5.108)

l0 9 Pierre Bouguer (1698–1758) was nominated at the age of 15 to be Professor of Hydrology as a successor to his father who had passed away. In 1735, Bouguer became a member of the Paris Acad´emie Royale des Sciences. He wrote several books about ship building and navigation. In his “Essai d’optique sur la gradation de la lumi`ere” (Essay in optics on the gradation of light), published in 1729, he was the ﬁrst to develop methods of photometry and layed down the law named after him, according to which the strength of a light ray in a homogeneous medium falls according to an exponential law as it passes through. 10 August Beer (1825–1863) became a Professor of Physics in Bonn in 1855. In his “Einleitung in die h¨ohere Optik” (Introduction to higher optics), published in 1854, he summarised the theory of light known at that time.

602

5 Thermal radiation

Fig. 5.42: Reduction of the spectral intensity Lλ in transit through a turbid (scattering and absorbing) medium

We will now apply (5.108) to solar radiation, Fig. 5.43. The path s of the bundle of rays is slightly curved because of refraction in the atmosphere. It begins, at large distance away, with Lλ (l0 ) = Lλ (s → ∞) = Lsol λ , the spectral intensity of extraterrestrial solar radiation, and ends at the earth’s surface (s = 0) with the intensity Lλ (s = 0). It therefore follows from (5.108), taking into account dl = − ds, that ∞ (5.109) Lλ (s = 0) = Lsol λ exp[−μ(λ) (s) ds] . 0

The ratio τλ =

∞ Lλ (s = 0) = exp[−μ(λ) (s) ds] sol Lλ 0

(5.110)

is the spectral transmissivity of the atmosphere (τλ ≤ 1). This is the factor by which the direct solar radiation reaching the ground is reduced compared to extraterrestrial solar radiation. The integral which appears in (5.109) and (5.110) ∞ m = (s) ds

(5.111)

0

is known as the optical mass of the atmosphere. Its units are kg/m2 , and it is proportional to the mass and therefore the number of atmospheric particles along the pathway of the solar ray bundle. If the sun is at its zenith, the pathway through the atmosphere is at its shortest and the optical mass attains its smallest value ∞ mn = (z) dz , 0

Fig. 5.43: Passage of directional solar radiation through the earth’s atmosphere

Fig. 5.44: Passage of directional solar radiation through a homogeneous, non-refractive atmosphere

5.4 Solar radiation

603

cf. Fig. 5.43. The ratio ∞ mr = m/mn =

∞

(s) ds

(z) dz

0

(5.112)

0

is called the relative optical mass, where mr ≥ 1 is valid. According to Fig. 5.44, for a homogeneous and non-refractive atmosphere, the simple result below is obtained 1 . (5.113) mr = cos βS This equation shows errors because of refraction and the height dependent density

. However, these errors only become signiﬁcant at large polar angles βS > 70◦ . According to F. Kasten and A.T. Young [5.35], for an atmosphere of dry air mr,L =

1 cos βS + 0.5057 (96.080 − βS)−1.6364

(5.114)

is obtained, where the sun’s polar angle βS is in degrees. With the relative optical mass mr, it follows for the argument of the exponential function in (5.110) that ∞

(s) ds = μ(λ) mn mr .

μ(λ) 0

If we combine the product of μ(λ) and mn into the dimensionless attenuation coeﬃcient κ(λ) := μ(λ) mn , (5.115) then the spectral transmissivity of the atmosphere is found to be τλ = exp [−κ(λ) mr (βS)] .

(5.116)

In the calculation of τλ it must be taken into account that several independent scattering and absorption processes act in the attenuation of direct solar radiation. It therefore holds that j κ(λ) mr = κi (λ) mr,i , (5.117) i=1

where j is the number of attenuation processes. In general, ﬁve diﬀerent types of process are considered: Rayleigh scattering on the molecules of the atmosphere, scattering and absorption on aerosols, the absorption by ozone, water vapour and other gases in the atmosphere. It follows from (5.116) and (5.117) that the spectral transmissivity is τλ = τλ,R τλ,A τλ,O3 τλ,W τλ,G , (5.118) where the indices are R for Rayleigh scattering, A for aerosols, O3 for ozone, W for water vapour and G for other gases in the atmosphere.

604

5.4.2.2

5 Thermal radiation

Molecular and aerosol scattering

As the molecular diameter (∼ 10−4 μm) is considerably smaller than the wavelength of the radiation, the scattering by the molecules of the atmosphere can be described by the theory of light scattering by small particles, ﬁrst presented by Lord Rayleigh11 [5.36], cf. also [5.37]. According to this, the attenuation coeﬃcient is κR (λ) ∼ λ−4 . This also explains the blue colour of a cloudless sky. The blue fraction of sunlight lies at the small wavelength end of the visible spectrum and therefore experiences strong Rayleigh scattering in all directions. Without this molecular scattering the sky would appear to be black with the exception of the bright disk of the sun. The scatter coeﬃcient κR (λ) of Rayleigh scattering in dry air is reproduced well by an equation presented by R.E. Bird and C. Riordan [5.38]. This gives the following for the spectral transmissivity with λ in μm −1 τλ,R = exp −mr,L λ−4 115.6406 − 1.335/λ2 . (5.119) The relative optical mass mr,L is given by (5.114). As can be seen in Fig. 5.45, at small wavelengths Rayleigh scattering considerably weakens direct solar radiation. In contrast to this, for λ > 1.2 μm no noticeable attenuation occurs. At large sun polar angles βS , that is with large optical masses mr,L > 5, the atmosphere is almost opaque for short wavelength light. This explains the reddish-yellow colour of the sun disc at sunrise and sunset.

Fig. 5.45: Spectral transmissivity τλ,R of the atmosphere as a result of Rayleigh scattering from (5.119) for various relative optical masses mr,L

Dust and small suspended water droplets form aerosols. They scatter and absorb solar radiant energy, whereby the scattered proportion predominates. The scattering and absorption by aerosols are diﬃcult and inexact to model. The turbidity formula from A. ˚ Angstr¨om [5.39] is frequently used ∗ τλ,A = exp −β ∗ λ−α mr,A . (5.120) Values between 0.8 and 1.8 are used for the exponent α∗ ; β ∗ varies from β ∗ = 0 (pure atmosphere) via 0.1 (clear) and 0.2 (cloudy) to 0.3 (very murky atmosphere), see for this [5.34]. The 11 John William Strutt, Third Baron of Rayleigh (1842–1919) set up his own physical laboratory at his family seat, Terling Place in Essex, England. In 430 scientiﬁc publications he dealt with problems from all areas of classical physics, in particular acoustics, for which he wrote his famous work, “The Theory of Sound” (1877/78). Together with W. Ramsey he discovered the element Argon (1892–95), for which he was awarded the Nobel prize for Physics in 1904. The chemist W. Ramsey was awarded the Nobel prize for Chemistry in the same year.

5.4 Solar radiation

605

relative optical aerosol mass mr,A is generally unknown because of the large ﬂuctuations in the size, distribution and composition of aerosol particles. This is why mr,L from (5.114) is often used in place of mr,A .

5.4.2.3

Absorption

In contrast to scattering, absorption only takes place within certain narrow wavelength intervals, the so-called absorption bands. The main constituents of the atmosphere are N2 and O2 , which dissociate to atomic N and O at heights above 100 km. These four gases only absorb, although very strongly, at small wavelengths. N and O absorb all radiation below 0.085 μm; O2 and N2 absorb solar radiation in several overlapping bands up to λ = 0.20 μm, so no radiation of wavelength below 0.20 μm reaches the earth’s surface. O2 has three additional distinctive but weak bands at 0.63, 0.69 and 0.76 μm. Ozone (O3 ) absorbs strongly between 0.2 μm and 0.35 μm, through which the energy rich UV-B-radiation is kept away from the earth. Further absorption bands lie in the visible region between 0.47 and 0.76 μm. Ozone is generated in the stratosphere principally by solar UV radiation; close to the ground it exists due to the photo-chemical decomposition of nitrous oxides. Chlorine, which reaches the stratosphere mainly in the form of long living chloroﬂuorocarbons (CFCs), attacks and destroys the protective stratospheric ozone layer. This is why the production and use of CFC’s, for example as refrigerants or as propellants for insulation foams, should be discontinued in the next few years, cf. [5.40]. The amount of ozone in the atmosphere is frequently indicated by the height hO3 of a vertical column of gaseous ozone under standard conditions (tn = 0 ◦ C, pn = 1.01325 bar). This quantity varies seasonally and with latitude; it has an average value of around 2.5 mm at the equator, 3.5 mm at medium latitudes and up to 4.5 mm at the poles. The amount of ozone has fallen over several years as a result of the discharge of CFCs. At the beginning of spring a reduction up to 20 % of the average value occurs over northern Europe. The “hole in the ozone layer” over the south pole, which appears in October, leads to a reduction at times of up to 75 %. Fig. 5.46 shows the spectral transmissivity τλ,O3 = exp [−kO3 (λ) hO3 mr,O3 ] .

(5.121)

Tabulated values of absorption coeﬃcients kO3 (λ) can be found in [5.34] and [5.38]. The relative optical mass of ozone is indicated by mr,O3 . It only deviates signiﬁcantly from mr,L for βS > 70◦ and can be calculated using a relationship given by N. Robinson [5.41]. The most important absorbers in the infrared region of the spectrum are water vapour and CO2 . Here the humidity of the atmosphere undergoes considerable ﬂuctuations. The amount of water vapour is often described by the thickness w of a layer of water on the ground formed by the condensation of water vapour perpendicular to the ground. A typical value is w = 20 mm. The law from Bouguer, (5.107), is not exactly valid for water vapour and CO2 . Therefore, relationships used for the transmission coeﬃcients τλ,W and τλ,G have a form diﬀerent from (5.116). These equations can be found in M. Iqbal [5.34], where the associated absorption coeﬃcients are given as functions of the wavelength. Fig. 5.47 shows the pattern of τλ,W and τλ,G . These spectral transmissivities have values close to one at wavelengths around 1.2 and 1.6 μm as well as at 2.2 and 3.9 μm. These narrow wavebands are called atmospheric windows, as here the atmosphere allows solar radiation and also radiation from the earth’s surface to pass through with virtually no attenuation.

606

5 Thermal radiation

Fig. 5.46: Spectral transmissivity τλ,O3 of the absorption by ozone from (5.121). The region of energy rich UV-B-radiation is highlighted.

Fig. 5.47: Spectral transmissivities τλ,W and τλ,G as a result of absorption by water vapour, O2 and CO2 respectively, for mr,L = 1

5.4.3

Direct solar radiation on the ground

The spectral transmissivity τλ from (5.110) also gives the ratio of the spectral irradiance Eλ,n of an area located on the ground and oriented perpendicular to sol by extraterrestrial solar the direction of radiation, to the spectral irradiance Eλ,n radiation. It therefore holds that sol sol = τλ,R τλ,A τλ,O3 τλ,W τλ,G Eλ,n , Eλ,n = τλ Eλ,n

(5.122)

and for an area whose normal forms an angle βS with the suns rays, it follows that sol Eλ = τλ cos βS Eλ,n .

(5.123)

sol Fig. 5.48 shows the extraterrestrial spectrum Eλ,n and the associated pattern of Eλ,n . The upper edge of this curve represents the irradiance reduced purely

5.4 Solar radiation

607

by Rayleigh scattering. The deteriorations marked in black are caused by the absorption by the gases O3 , O2 , H2 O and CO2. Further diagrams of this type, which show the variation in the inﬂuencing quantities (water vapour and ozone content, turbidness due to aerosols, diﬀerent optical masses), are available in M. Iqbal [5.34].

sol Fig. 5.48: Spectral irradiance Eλ,n of extraterrestrial solar radiation and Eλ,n of direct solar radiation at the ground for a pure, cloudless atmosphere with mr,L = 1.5. The curve indicated sol by τλ,R Eλ,n represents the attenuation caused by Rayleigh scattering alone. The dark areas indicate the absorption by each of the gases written on the graph (hO3 = 0.30 cm, w = 2.0 cm)

In most practical applications, it is normally suﬃcient to know just the irradiance E at an area on the ground. The most exact method for obtaining E is by integrating the spectral irradiance Eλ over all wavelengths, practically from λ = 0.3 μm to λ = 4.0 μm. In order to avoid this somewhat diﬃcult numerical integration, approximation formulae are used. Various authors have presented these formulae and they have been collected and compared by M. Iqbal [5.34]. A rather accurate calculation of E is permitted by the relationships given by R.E. Bird and R.L. Hulstrom [5.42] for the irradiance of direct (directional) solar radiation. The irradiance of a surface, whose normal forms an angle βS with the sun’s rays, is E = En cos βS .

(5.124)

The irradiance En of a surface normal to the sun’s rays is, according to [5.42] and [5.34], En = 0.975 E0 τR τA τO3 τW τG ,

(5.125)

where the transmissivities are calculated according to the following equations. The relative optical mass mr,L from (5.114) is uniformly used, simpliﬁed to here mr . Rayleigh scattering: 1 + mr − m1.01 . τR = exp −0.0903 m0.84 r r

608

5 Thermal radiation

Aerosol scattering: τA = 0.1245 α∗ − 0.0162 + (1.003 − 0.125 α∗ ) exp [−β ∗ mr (1.089 α∗ + 0.5123)] , where α∗ and β ∗ are the parameters from (5.120). τA can also be given as a function of the (horizontal) visibility sh in km: 1.265 τA = exp m0.9 , 5 km < sh < 180 km . r ln 0.97 − 0.66 sh The utilisation of sh replaces the estimation of the parameters α∗ and β ∗ . Absorption by Ozone12 : 0.153 hO3 mr τO3 = 1 − , (1 + 139.5 hO3 mr )0.3035 where hO3 is entered in cm, cf. section 5.4.2.3. Absorption by water vapour: τW = 1 −

2.496 w mr 6.385 w mr + (1 + 79.03 w mR )

0.6828

with w in cm, cf. section 5.4.2.3. Absorption by CO2 and other gases:

τG = exp −0.0127 m0.26 . r

Example 5.7: Determine the irradiance of direct solar radiation on a horizontal area in Berlin on 1st September, 12.00 central European summertime, cf. Example 5.6. The sky is cloudless, hO3 = 0.30 cm, w = 2.6 cm and a horizontal visibility of sh = 40 km may be assumed. According to Example 5.6 the sun’s polar angle is βS = 46.05◦ . This gives, from (5.114), a relative optical mass mr,L = mr = 1.439. The transmissivities that appear in (5.125) have the following values: τR = 0.8852,

τO3 = 0.9811,

τW = 0.8715,

τG = 0.9861,

τA = 0.8100 .

It follows from (5.125) that En = 805.8 W/m2 ; with cos βS = 0.694, according to (5.124) E = 559 W/m2 is obtained. This value reaches only 59.9 % of the irradiance E sol of extraterrestrial solar radiation calculated in Example 5.6. Scattering and absorption by aerosols are of great inﬂuence. If a less turbid atmosphere is assumed with sh = 100 km, then τA increases to τA = 0.8766, and the irradiance reaches a value of E = 605 W/m2 .

5.4.4

Diﬀuse solar radiation and global radiation

In addition to the direct solar radiation dealt with in the previous sections, part of the radiation scattered in the atmosphere also reaches the ground. This is known as diﬀuse solar radiation. Diﬀuse and direct solar radiation are partially reﬂected by the ground; the reﬂected radiation is also sent back to the ground by the atmosphere to a small extent. The reﬂection between the atmosphere and 12

The equation for τO3 has been simpliﬁed, compared with [5.42], without any loss of accuracy.

5.4 Solar radiation

609

the earth’s surface continues with increasingly smaller fractions of radiation, and leads in total, to an additional radiation ﬂow towards the ground. This radiation and the diﬀuse solar radiation are together called sky-radiation. This should not be confused with the atmospheric counter-radiation mentioned in section 5.4.2; this long wave radiation is emitted by molecules in the atmosphere, chieﬂy water vapour and CO2 . Sky-radiation, on the other hand, occurs at small wavelengths due to its formation in the scattering of directional solar radiation. This is shown by Fig. 5.49, which exemplarily illustrates the three fractions of the spectral irR Ae radiance Eλ,d of diﬀuse sky-radiation, namely Eλ,d of Rayleigh scattering, Eλ,d of MR aerosol scattering and Eλ,d as a result of multiple reﬂections.

Fig. 5.49: Spectral irradiance of the three fractions of diﬀuse sky-radiation, calculated for mr,L = 1.5, hO3 = 0.3 cm, w = 2.0 cm as well as α∗ = 1.3 and β ∗ = 0.10 in Ra Ae (5.120): Eλ,d spectral irradiance of Rayleigh scattering Eλ,d of scattering by aerosols, MR Eλ,d spectral irradiance due to multiple reﬂection.

The direct solar radiation and the diﬀuse sky-radiation are combined under the term global radiation. The global irradiance EG of a horizontal area on the ground is made up of the following parts: EG = En cos βS + EdRa + EdAe + EdMR .

(5.126)

Here, the ﬁrst term on the right hand side is the irradiance due to direct solar radiation, from (5.124) and (5.125); EdRa indicates the irradiance of diﬀuse radiation from Rayleigh scattering by air molecules, EdAe the irradiance of diﬀuse radiation caused by aerosol scattering, and EdMR the irradiance due to multiple reﬂection. For areas inclined to the horizontal, more complicated relationships are yielded because the radiative exchange with the surroundings of the area being considered also have to be taken into account. M. Iqbal [5.34] is suggested for an extensive illustration of this. The model from R.E. Bird and R.L. Hulstrom [5.42], see also [5.34], is once again mentioned for the calculation of the diﬀuse fraction of radiation in (5.126). The source of the scattered

610

5 Thermal radiation

radiation is the non-absorbed direct solar radiation with the irradiance Enna = 0.786 E0 cos βS τO3 τW τG τAabs . Here, τAabs is the transmissivity resulting from the absorption by aerosols alone: τAabs = 1 − (1 − ω0 ) (1 − τA ) 1 − mr + m1.06 . r The quantity ω0 is the ratio of the energy scattered from the aerosols to the energy scattered and absorbed by them. This fraction can only be estimated; values of around 0.9 are generally used. Under the assumption that half of the energy scattered by molecules in the atmosphere reaches the ground, according to [5.42], we obtain EdRa =

1 na 1 − τR E 2 n 1 − mr + m1.02 r

for the irradiance as a result of Rayleigh scattering. For the irradiance from aerosol scattering we get 1 − τA /τAabs EdAe = FA Enna . 1 − mr + m1.02 r The factor FA indicates what proportion of the energy scattered by the aerosols is scattered “forwards”, i.e. the part which reaches the ground. FA also has to be estimated. R.E. Bird and R.L. Hulstrom recommend FA = 0.84. G.D. Robinson [5.43] determined FA for aerosols over the British Isles; these values are well reproduced by 0.91 for 0 ≤ βS ≤ 45◦ FA = . 0.45 + 0.65 cos βS for 45◦ < βS ≤ 85◦ Through considerations, analogous to the explanation of multiple reﬂection in section 5.3.4, we obtain rE rAt EdMR = En cos βS + EdRa + EdAe . (5.127) 1 − rE rAt Here, rE is the reﬂectivity of the earth’s surface for short wave radiation originating from the sun; it is also known as the Albedo in meteorology. rE can be calculated from information about the absorptivity of solar radiation, given in the following section 5.4.5. The reﬂectivity of the atmosphere is indicated by rAt ; it is small and, according to [5.42], can be calculated from rAt = 0.0685 + (1 − FA ) 1 − τA /τAabs . With EdMR from (5.127), we obtain the following for the irradiance of global radiation on a horizontal area from (5.126) EG = En cos βS + EdRa + EdAe

1 . 1 − rE rAt

This equation is also valid for models in which En , EdRa , EdAe and rAt are determined using diﬀerent relationships than those in [5.42]. Example 5.8: Calculate the irradiances of the diﬀuse solar radiation and the global radiation for the case dealt with in Example 5.7. Additional assumptions are: ω0 = 0.90, FA according to G.D. Robinson [5.43] and rE = 0.25. With mr = 1.439 and τA = 0.810 from Example 5.7, we obtain τAabs = 0.980. With that and the other transmissivities calculated in Example 5.7, the irradiance of the non-absorbed direct solar radiation is found to be Enna = 0.786 · 1367

W W 0.694 · 0.9811 · 0.8715 · 0.9861 · 0.980 = 616 2 . m2 m

5.4 Solar radiation

611

For the Rayleigh fraction, the irradiance then follows as EdRa = 35.0 W/m2 . With FA = 0.45 + 0.65 cos 46.05◦ = 0.90 we obtain the irradiance for the aerosol fraction as EdAe = 95.3 W/m2 . The reﬂectivity of the atmosphere is rAt = 0.086, and with that the fraction due to multiple reﬂection is calculated to be EdMR = (559 + 35.0 + 95.3)

W 0.25 · 0.086 W = 15.1 2 . m2 1 − 0.25 · 0.086 m

The irradiance of the diﬀuse sky-radiation is therefore EdRa + EdAe + EdMR = 145 W/m2 , which is 26 % of the irradiance of the direct solar radiation. The global irradiance is EG = 704 W/m2 . If we assume a less turbid atmosphere, like in Example 5.7, with τA = 0.8766, then τAabs = 0.987 and rAt = 0.080. This yields EdRa = 35.2 W/m2 , EdAe = 61.8 W/m2 and EdMR = 14.3 W/m2 . The irradiance of the diﬀuse radiation, with 111 W/m2 , is smaller, whilst the irradiance of the direct radiation, calculated as in Example 5.7, has increased to 605 W/m2 . The global radiation is, with EG = 716 W/m2 , only 1.7 % larger than in the more turbid atmosphere.

5.4.5

Absorptivities for solar radiation

The spectral emissivity ελ (λ, T ) of almost all substances assumes considerably diﬀerent values at small wavelengths below 2 μm, than at larger wavelengths. The spectral emissivities of electrical insulators are generally signiﬁcantly smaller, and the spectral emissivities of metals a little larger than at large wavelengths. Assuming a diﬀuse radiating surface (Lambert radiator), this behaviour is also true of the spectral absorptivity aλ(λ, T ), because aλ(λ, T ) = ελ(λ, T ). It is therefore to be expected that most substances behave diﬀerently in the absorption of solar radiation than in the absorption of predominantly long-wave radiation from earthly radiation sources. The model of a grey Lambert radiator, with a(T ) = ε(T ) can therefore not be applied to the absorption of solar radiation. Rather, it is to be expected that the absorptivities deviate vastly from the tabulated emissivities. These absorptivities aS for the absorption of predominantly short-wave solar radiation, generally have to be determined by special measurements. Some results from such measurements are put together in Table 5.8. Further data for “natural” surfaces like corn ﬁelds, diﬀerent soil types, forests, snow and ice can be found in K.Y. Kondratyew [5.44], in the form of reﬂectivity rS = 1 − aS , that is also known as the albedo in meteorological circles, see also [5.34]. For solar technology applications, the ratio aS /ε of a surface is of great importance. It should be large for solar collectors, so that the radiation to the surroundings proportional to ε is small compared to the absorbed solar radiation.

612

5 Thermal radiation

Table 5.8: Absorptivity aS for solar radiation and (total) emissivity ε = ε(300 K) of diﬀerent materials Material Aluminium, polished Chromium, polished Iron, galvanised rough Gold, polished Copper, polished oxidised Magnesium, polished Nickel, polished Platinum, shiny Silver, polished

aS

ε

0.20 0.40 0.38 0.75 0.29 0.18 0.70 0.19 0.36 0.31 0.13

0.08 0.07

aS /ε Material

aS

ε

aS /ε

2.5 5.7

Asphalt, Road covering 0.93 Leaves, green 0.71...0.79 0,86 0.83...0.92 Tar paper, black 0.82 0.91 0.90 0.82 0.91 Earth, ploughed 0.75 0.026 11.1 Paint 0.03 6.0 Zinc white 0.22 0.92 0.24 0.45 1.56 Black oil paint 0.90 0.92 0.98 0.12 1.6 Marble, white 0.46 0.90 0.51 0.09 4.0 Slate 0.88 0.91 0.97 0.07 4.4 Snow, clean 0.20...0.35 0,95 0.21...0.37 0.018 7.2 Brick, red 0.75 0.93 0.81

If, in contrast, the surface under solar radiation is to assume a low temperature, aS /ε should be as small as possible, which, for example, can be achieved by painting the surface white, (aS = 0.22; ε = 0.92) giving aS/ε = 0.24.

5.5

Radiative exchange

In heat transfer by radiation, energy is not only transported from hot to cold bodies; the colder body also emits radiation that strikes the warmer body and can be absorbed there. An exchange of energy takes place, in contrast to the transfer that occurs in heat conduction and convection. This radiative exchange depends on the mutual position and orientation of the radiating surfaces, their temperatures and there radiative properties. In the following sections it is assumed that the radiating surfaces are separated by a medium that has no eﬀect on the radiative exchange, that neither absorbs, emits nor scatters radiation. This condition is exactly satisﬁed by a vacuum, although most gases also have little eﬀect on radiative exchange. We will discuss gas radiation in section 5.6. Even when the medium between the surfaces has no inﬂuence on the radiative exchange, the calculations are still diﬃcult if the directional and wavelength dependence of the absorbed, emitted and reﬂected radiation is to be considered exactly. We will therefore use the grey Lambert radiator from 5.3.2.3 as a model in the following discussions, and, (with the exception of 5.5.4), assume that reﬂection is diﬀuse. The complex calculation for radiative exchange between two surfaces that are neither diﬀuse nor grey radiators is dealt with extensively by R. Siegel et al., [5.37], [5.45]. The geometric relationships for radiative exchange between grey Lambert radiators are described by the view factor, which we will look at in section 5.5.1. The section after that deals with radiative exchange between black bodies, a simple case due to the fact that no reﬂection takes place. Radiative exchange between

5.5 Radiative exchange

613

any two isothermal areas that behave like grey Lambert radiators is explained in 5.5.3. Finally, the last section covers the insulating eﬀect of radiation shields where we will also consider specularly reﬂecting surfaces.

5.5.1

View factors

The calculation of radiative exchange between two surfaces requires a quantity that describes the inﬂuence of their position and orientation. This is the view factor, which is also known by the terms conﬁguration factor or angle factor. The view factor indicates to what extent one surface can be “seen” by another, or more exactly, what proportion of the radiation from surface 1 falls on surface 2.

Fig. 5.50: Geometric quantities for the calculation of the view factor

The ﬁrst step in the calculation of the view factor is to determine the radiation ﬂow d2 Φ12 , emitted from surface element dA1 that strikes surface element dA2 , Fig. 5.50. With L1 as the intensity of the radiation emitted from dA1 , from (5.11), we get d2Φ12 = L1 cos β1 dA1 dω2 . Here, dω2 is the solid angle at which the surface element dA2 appears to dA1 : dω2 =

dA2n cos β2 dA2 = . r2 r2

This produces cos β1 cos β2 dA1 dA2 . (5.128) r2 This relationship is also known as the photometric fundamental law. According to this, the radiation that reaches dA2 decreases with the square of the distance r between radiation source and receiver. In addition to this, the orientation of the surface elements to the straight line between them is of importance. This is expressed in terms of a cosine function of the two polar angles β1 and β2 . We will now calculate the radiation that is emitted by the ﬁnite surface 1 that strikes surface 2, Fig. 5.50. This involves the assumption that the intensity L1 is d2 Φ12 = L1

614

5 Thermal radiation

constant over the entire surface 1. Integration of (5.128) over both surfaces yields cos β1 cos β2 Φ12 = L1 dA1 dA2 . (5.129) r2 A1 A2

This is the radiation ﬂow emitted by 1 that falls on 2. With Φ1 = πL1 A1 as the radiation ﬂow emitted by surface 1 into the hemisphere, the view factor is obtained as Φ12 1 cos β1 cos β2 = dA1 dA2 . (5.130) F12 := Φ1 πA1 r2 A1 A2

This quantity gives the proportion of the radiation emitted by surface 1 that falls on surface 2. The view factor is only dependent on the geometry. This is the result of the limiting assumption of constant intensity L1 : Equation (5.130) is only valid if surface 1 radiates diﬀusely, has a constant temperature and the same radiation properties over the entire area. If the indices 1 and 2 are exchanged in (5.130), then Φ21 1 cos β1 cos β2 F21 = = dA1 dA2 (5.131) Φ2 πA2 r2 A2 A1

is obtained as the proportion of the radiation ﬂow emitted by surface 2 (at constant intensity L2 !), that strikes surface 1. The equations (5.130) and (5.131) provide the important reciprocity rule for view factors, A1F12 = A2 F21 .

(5.132)

This means that only one of the two view factors has to be determined by the generally very complicated integration of (5.130) or (5.131).

Fig. 5.51: Enclosure and radiation ﬂows Φij , emitted from the area Ai

Fig. 5.52: Enclosure formed by the concentric spherical areas 1 and 2

5.5 Radiative exchange

615

A further relationship between view factors can be found when n areas, for each of which Li = const holds, form an enclosure such as that illustrated schematically in Fig. 5.51. From the radiation balance for area i, Φi1 + Φi2 + · · · + Φin = Φi , and by dividing by Φi , the summation rule n

Fij = 1 ,

i = 1, 2, . . . n

(5.133)

j=1

is obtained. Fii also belongs to the view factors in the sum. It tells us what proportion of the radiation emitted by i strikes i. Fii = 0 is only possible for a concave surface; it “sees itself”. For ﬂat and convex surfaces, we have Fii = 0. A simple example for the application of the relationships (5.132) and (5.133) is provided by radiation in an enclosure formed by two spherical surfaces 1 and 2, Fig. 5.52. There are four view factors in this case, F11 , F12 , F21 and F22 . The summation rule is applied to the inner sphere in order to calculate them: F11 + F12 = 1 . As surface 1 is convex, we have F11 = 0, and it follows that F12 = 1: All the radiation emitted by 1 strikes the outer sphere surface 2. The factor F21 is obtained using the reciprocity rule (5.132) with A1 and A2 as the surfaces of the two spheres: 2 r1 A1 A1 F21 = F12 = = <1 . A2 A2 r2 The fourth view factor is found by applying the summation rule F21 + F22 = 1 to the outer sphere 2 F22 = 1 − F21 = 1 − (A1 /A2 ) = 1 − (r1 /r2 ) . It is not equal to zero because part of the radiation emitted by the outer spherical surface also strikes it again.

View factors are not always as easy to ﬁnd as for the simple geometry present in the example we have just looked at. Then the multiple integral in (5.130) has to be evaluated. However, not all the view factors have to be calculated in this manner. In an enclosure bounded by n surfaces there are n2 view factors in total. From these, n view factors can be found by the application of the summation rule (5.133) on each of the n surfaces. In addition to this, n(n − 1)/2 view factors can be determined using the reciprocity rule (5.132). Therefore the number of view factors that have to be calculated from (5.130) is only n2 − n − n(n − 1)/2 = n(n − 1)/2 . This number is reduced even further by the number of ﬂat or convex surfaces for which Fii = 0 holds. The multiple integral in (5.130) has been calculated for a large number of geometrical arrangements, most of which yield equations that are diﬃcult to evaluate. The methods that should be applied to obtain these equations are reported

616

5 Thermal radiation

by R. Siegel [5.45], and other authors. Some examples of calculated view factors are presented in Table 5.9. A larger collection of view factors can be found in R. Siegel and others [5.45] with numerous information on sources, in the VDIHeatAtlas [5.46] and in J.R. Howell [5.47]. Example 5.9: Calculate the view factors for the inside of a cylinder, according to Fig. 5.53, with r = 0.10 m and h = 0.25 m.

Fig. 5.53: Hollow cylinder with end areas 1 and 2 and body surface 3

In an enclosure bounded by three surfaces there are 9 view factors. Of these only 3 need to be calculated according to (5.130). As the end areas 1 and 2 are ﬂat, we have F11 = 0 and F22 = 0, so that only one view factor has to be determined by evaluating the double integral from (5.130). This is the view factor F12 ; it is found from Table 5.9 (two equally sized, parallel concentric circular discs) with z = 2 + (h/r)2 = 8.25 to be

1 F12 = z − z 2 − 4 = 0.123 . 2 This means that F13 = 1 − F12 = 0.877. From symmetry (or by applying the reciprocity rule), we ﬁnd that F21 = F12 = 0.123 and F23 = 1 − F21 = 0.877 = F13 . From the reciprocity rule A3 F31 = A1 F13 follows

A1 πr 2 F13 = F13 = 0.1754 . A3 2πrh (symmetry!), from F31 =

With F32 = F31

F31 + F32 + F33 = 1 we ﬁnally get F33 = 1 − 2F31 = 0.649 .

5.5 Radiative exchange

Table 5.9: View factors F12 for selected geometric arrangements Two infinitely long, parallel strips, with centre lines that lie vertically above one another

F12

x = b1 /h ; y = b2 /h 1 = (x + y)2 + 4 − (y − x)2 + 4 2x

Two infinitely long strips, perpendicular to each other with a common edge

F12 =

1 b1 − 1 + (b2 /b1 )2 1+ 2 b2

Two identical, parallel rectangles lying opposite each other x = a/h ; y = b/h

F12

1 + x2 1 + y 2 2 1 = ln πxy 2 1 + x2 + y 2

x +x 1 + y 2 arctan

1 + y2 √ y +y 1 + x2 arctan √ − x arctan x − y arctan y 1 + x2

Two rectangles perpendicular to each other with a common edge x = b1 /a ; y = b2 /a 1 1 1 x arctan + y arctan F12 = πx x y

1 − x2 + y 2 arctan

x2 + y 2 1 + x2 1 + y 2 1 + ln 4 1 + x2 + y 2 2 x2 1 + x2 + y 2 y 2 1 + x2 + y 2 x y2 + ln + ln 4 (1 + x2 ) (x2 + y 2 ) 4 (1 + x2 ) (x2 + y 2)

617

618

5 Thermal radiation

Table 5.9: (continued) Two parallel circular disks with common central vertical x = r1 /h ; y = r2 /h z = 1 + 1 + y 2 /x2 F12 =

1 z − z 2 − 4 (y/x)2 2

An infinitely long strip and an infinitely long cylinder parallel to it

F12 =

r b−a

a b arctan − arctan h h

Two infinitely long, parallel cylinders with equal diameters x = h/2r F12 = F21 =

1 π

1 x2 − 1 + arcsin − x x

A sphere and a circular disk, whose central vertical goes through the centre of the sphere

F12

⎛ ⎞ 1⎝ 1 ⎠ = 1− 2 2 1 + (r2 /h)

Two areas on the inner side of a hollow sphere

F12 =

A2 4πr 2

5.5 Radiative exchange

5.5.2

619

Radiative exchange between black bodies

The calculation of radiative exchange is simpliﬁed if black bodies are considered, because no reﬂection occurs and the entire incident radiation ﬂow is absorbed. Besides that, the intensity Ls of a black body is only dependent on its temperature. Therefore the intensity is constant on an isothermal surface of a black body. This was a prerequisite for the calculation of view factors in the previous section.

Fig. 5.54: Radiation ﬂows Φ12 and Φ21 in direct radiative exchange between black bodies 1 and 2

We will calculate ﬁrst the direct radiative interchange between two black bodies of arbitrary shape with surfaces A1 and A2 and uniform temperatures T1 and T2 , Fig. 5.54. In this case, all radiation ﬂows emitted by one body that do not strike the other body will be ignored. The proportion of the radiation ﬂow emitted by 1 and incident on 2 is given by Φ12 = A1 F12σT14 . This energy ﬂow is absorbed by black body 2. The radiation ﬂow received and absorbed by black body 1, from body 2, is Φ21 = A2 F21σT24 . The net radiation ﬂow transferred by direct radiative interchange from 1 to 2 is therefore Φ∗12 = Φ12 − Φ21 = A1 F12σT14 − A2 F21σT24 . If both bodies are at the same temperature T1 = T2 , then no (net) energy ﬂow will be transferred between them: Φ∗12 = 0. This then yields A1F12 = A2 F21 , i.e. the reciprocity rule, (5.132), for view factors, previously derived in another manner. This gives Φ∗12 = A1 F12σ T14 − T24 = A2 F21 σ T14 − T24 . (5.134) The net radiation ﬂow transferred by direct radiative exchange between two black bodies is proportional to the diﬀerence of the fourth powers of their thermodynamic temperatures. We will now consider a hollow enclosure surrounded by walls consisting of several parts each with an isothermal surface, Fig. 5.55. According to H.C. Hottel

620

5 Thermal radiation

and A.F. Saroﬁm [5.48], these isothermal sections of the surrounding walls are called zones. Non-isothermal walls with continuously changing temperatures can be approximated by a series of suﬃciently small zones each at a diﬀerent temperature. In the following all zones are assumed to be black surfaces. An opening in the enclosure is viewed as a zone with such a temperature that its radiation corresponds to the radiation, being assumed to be black, coming from outside through the opening into the enclosure.

Fig. 5.55: a Hollow enclosure bounded by black radiating edges. b Illustration of the energy balance for the zone i

In order to maintain a steady state, each zone has to have a heat ﬂow supplied (or removed) from outside, to make up the diﬀerence between the emitted radiation ﬂows and the sum of all the incident (and absorbed) radiation ﬂows. The energy balance for zone i with surface Ai and temperature Ti is Q˙ i = Ai σTi4 −

n

Aj Fji σTj4 .

(5.135)

j=1

By applying the reciprocity rule (5.132) the following is obtained Q˙ i = Ai σTi4 −

n

Ai Fij σTj4 .

j=1

Since, according to (5.133),

n $

Fij = 1, it also holds that

j=1

Q˙ i = Ai σ

n

Fij Ti4 − Tj4

;

i = 1, 2, . . . n .

(5.136)

j=1

The heat ﬂow supplied to zone i from outside (or, with Q˙ i < 0, released to the outside), is the sum of the net radiation ﬂows Φ∗ij from (5.134) between zone i and the other zones that bound the enclosure. A zone with Q˙ i > 0 is called a (net) radiation source, as it emits more radiation than it absorbs. A zone with Q˙ i < 0 is a (net) radiation receiver, that absorbs more radiation than it emits. An adiabatic zone (Q˙ i = 0) with respect to the outside is known as a reradiating wall. Its temperature is such that it emits just as much radiation as it absorbs from radiation incident upon it (radiative equilibrium).

5.5 Radiative exchange

621

Fig. 5.56: Enclosure formed from radiation source 1, radiation receiver 2 and reradiating walls with Q˙ R = 0

The heat ﬂows for all the zones can be found from (5.136) for given temperatures. If, on the contrary, some of the heat ﬂows are known, the n balance equations (5.136) represent a linear system of equations, from which all the unknown temperatures and heat ﬂows can be determined. An enclosure with only three zones is often a good approximation for the case of a radiation source of area A1 and temperature T1 in radiative exchange with a radiation receiver of area A2 and temperature T2 < T1 , cf. Fig. 5.56. In addition to this walls that are adiabatic with respect to the outside also participate in the radiative exchange. These can be roughly assigned a uniﬁed temperature, TR . The reradiating walls that enclose the space are combined here into a single zone with TR and Q˙ R = 0. The following balance equations are valid for this hollow enclosure with three black radiating zones: , (5.137a) Q˙ 1 = A1 σ F12 T14 − T24 + F1R T14 − TR4 , Q˙ 2 = A2 σ F21 T24 − T14 + F2R T24 − TR4

4

0 = AR σ FR1 TR4 − T1

+ FR2 TR4 − T24 .

(5.137b) (5.137c)

With the reciprocity rule (5.132) it follows from here that Q˙ 2 = −Q˙ 1 , which is also yielded from the balance for the entire enclosure. The temperature of the reradiating zone is obtained from (5.137c) as A1 F1R T14 + A2 F2R T24 (5.138) TR4 = A1 F1R + A2 F2R and by elimination of TR4 from (5.137a) Q˙ 1 = −Q˙ 2 = A1 F 12 σ T14 − T24

(5.139)

with the modiﬁed view factor F 12 = F12 +

F1R F2R . (A1 /A2 )F1R + F2R

(5.140)

As comparison with (5.134) shows, the heat ﬂow Q˙ 1 transferred from 1 to 2 is increased compared to the net radiation ﬂow Φ∗12 due to the reradiating walls, because F 12 > F12 . If the radiation source and receiver have ﬂat or convex surfaces (F11 = 0, F22 = 0), then the view factors F1R and F2R can lead back to F12 and instead of (5.140) F 12 =

2 1 − (A1 /A2 )F12 1 − 2(A1 /A2 )F12 + A1 /A2

is obtained. Only one view factor, namely F12 is required to calculate Q˙ 1 .

(5.141)

622

5 Thermal radiation

Example 5.10: The hollow cylinder from Example 5.9 has black radiating walls. The two ends are kept at temperatures T1 = 550 K and T2 = 300 K. The body area 3 is adiabatic, Q˙ 3 = Q˙ R = 0. Calculate the heat ﬂow Q˙ 1 and the temperature T3 = TR of the reradiating body area, if this is taken to be an approximately isothermal area (zone). In order to determine the heat ﬂow Q˙ 1 from (5.139), the modiﬁed view factor F 12 is required. This can be calculated according to (5.141), because the two ends are ﬂat. With F12 = 0.123 from Example 5.9 and A1 /A2 = 1, F 12 = 0.5615 is obtained. This yields the following from (5.139) W Q˙ 1 = −Q˙ 2 = π · 0.102 m2 · 0.5615 · 5.67 · 10−8 2 4 5504 − 3004 K4 = 83.4 W . m K The temperature of the reradiating shell area can be found from (5.138). With F1R = F13 = F23 = F2R (symmetry!) and A1 = A2 we get TR4 =

1 4 T + T24 2 1

and from that TR = 472 K. This is the temperature at which the assumed isothermal body area emits as much energy as it absorbs. In reality the temperature of the body area varies continuously between T1 and T2 , radiation with diﬀerent irradiance strikes each annular strip of inﬁnitesimal width. So each strip has a diﬀerent emissive power and assumes a temperature accordingly. The correct treatment of this type of radiative exchange process with continuously varying temperature (corresponding to an inﬁnite number of inﬁnitesimal zones) is mathematically very involved; see [5.45], p. 107–132 for more information.

5.5.3

Radiative exchange between grey Lambert radiators

If the bodies participating in radiative exchange cannot be assumed to be black bodies, then the reﬂected radiation ﬂows also have to be considered. In hollow enclosures, multiple reﬂection combined with partial absorption of the incident radiation takes place. A general solution for radiative exchange problems without simplifying assumptions is only possible in exceptional cases. If the boundary walls of the hollow enclosure are divided into isothermal zones, like in 5.5.2, then a relatively simple solution is obtained, if these zones behave like grey Lambert radiators. Each zone is characterised purely by its hemispherical total emissivity εi = εi (Ti ), whilst ai = εi is valid for its absorptivity, and for the reﬂectivity we have ri = 1 − εi . In addition to this the intensity is constant for each zone. The reﬂected radiation also has constant intensity, if diﬀuse reﬂection is assumed, cf. section 5.1.5. The sum of the radiation emitted and reﬂected from one zone therefore obeys the cosine law, so just like for black bodies, view factors can be used to describe the radiative exchange between the zones. We will now investigate radiative exchange between the isothermal walls (zones) of the enclosure illustrated in Fig. 5.57. The temperature of some of the zones is known, for others the heat ﬂow supplied from or released to the outside is given. The heat ﬂows of the zones with known temperatures and the temperature of

5.5 Radiative exchange

623

Fig. 5.57: Hollow enclosure bounded by isothermal surfaces (zones) each of which is a grey Lambert radiator

each zone with stipulated heat ﬂow are what we are seeking. There are as many unknown quantities (temperatures or heat ﬂows) as there are zones. The energy balance equations for all the zones need to be established to solve this radiative exchange problem. This is done using the net-radiation method introduced by G. Poljak [5.49]. This yields a system of linear equations that, when solved, deliver the unknown temperatures and heat ﬂows. With simple problems of only two or three zones, an electrical circuit analogy presented by A.K. Oppenheim [5.50] leads, in a simple manner, to the relationship between the temperatures and heat ﬂows of the zones. 5.5.3.1

The balance equations according to the net-radiation method

According to G. Poljak, a new quantity has to be introduced when setting up the energy balance equation for a zone. It combines the radiation emitted and reﬂected by an isothermal surface i. It is made up by adding the emissive power Mi of the surface i and the reﬂected portion of its irradiance Ei : Hi := Mi + ri Ei = Mi + (1 − εi )Ei .

(5.142)

The quantity Hi is called the radiosity of the surface i, cf. E.R.G. Eckert [5.51].

Fig. 5.58: Illustration of the energy balance for the zone i with area Ai

We will now set up the energy balance illustrated in Fig. 5.58 for a zone i. The heat ﬂow Q˙ i supplied from outside has to cover the diﬀerence between the emitted and reﬂected radiation ﬂow and the incident radiation ﬂow. It holds, therefore, that (5.143) Q˙ i = Ai (Hi − Ei ) ; the heat ﬂow agrees with the net radiation ﬂow. We now calculate the irradiance Ei from (5.142) and put it into (5.143) with the result Q˙ i =

Ai Ai εi 4 σTi − Hi . (Mi − εi Hi ) = 1 − εi 1 − εi

(5.144)

624

5 Thermal radiation

The emissivity εi appearing here is normally dependent on the temperature; it has to be calculated at the temperature Ti of the zone i: εi = εi (Ti). A second relationship between Q˙ i and Hi is obtained, when the radiation ﬂow Ai Ei incident on zone i is linked with the radiation ﬂows emitted by the other zones. The radiation ﬂow Aj Hj is sent out by zone j, but only the radiation ﬂow Aj Fji Hj , multiplied by the view factor Fji , strikes zone i. Therefore, the total radiation striking zone i is Ai Ei =

n j=1

Aj Fji Hj = Ai

n

Fij Hj ,

j=1

where the reciprocity rule (5.132) has been applied for the view factors. Putting this expression into (5.143), and taking (5.133) into account, it follows that n n Q˙ i = Ai Hi − Fij Hj = Ai Fij (Hi − Hj ) . j=1

(5.145)

j=1

The two balance equations (5.144) and (5.145) can be established for each zone (i = 1, 2, . . . n). Therefore, 2n equations are available for the n unknown radiosities Hi and the n required values for Q˙ i and Ti respectively. Before we go into this equation system in 5.5.3.4, the next section oﬀers solutions for the more simple case of enclosures bounded by only two or three zones. 5.5.3.2

Radiative exchange between a radiation source, a radiation receiver and a reradiating wall

An enclosure surrounded by three isothermal surfaces (zones), like that shown schematically in Fig. 5.59, serves as a good approximation for complicated cases of radiative exchange. Zone 1 at temperature T1 and with emissivity ε1 is the (net-) radiation source, it is supplied with a heat ﬂow Q˙ 1 from outside. Zone 2 with temperature T2 < T1 and emissivity ε2 is the radiation receiver, whilst the third zone at temperature TR, assumed to be spatially constant, is a reradiating wall, (Q˙ R = 0). The heat ﬂow Q˙ 1 = −Q˙ 2 transferred by radiative exchange in the enclosure is to be determined.

Fig. 5.59: Enclosure formed by a radiation source 1, radiation receiver 2 and (adiabatic) reradiating walls R

The solution of this problem starts with the writing of the two fundamental

5.5 Radiative exchange

Fig. 5.60: Equivalent electrical circuit diagram for (5.146) with “reﬂection resistance” (1 − εi )/Ai εi

625

Fig. 5.61: Equivalent electrical circuit diagram for (5.147): Current branching with the “geometric resistances” (Ai Fij )−1

balance equations (5.144) and (5.145) in the form σTi4 − Hi Q˙ i = 1 − εi Ai εi and Q˙ i =

n Hi − H j . 1 j=1 Ai Fij

(5.146)

(5.147)

We put these relationships in analogy to an electrical circuit. According to (5.146), the “current” Q˙ i , caused by the “potential diﬀerence” between σTi4 and Hi , ﬂows through a “conductor” with “resistance” (1 − εi )/Ai εi . This is illustrated in the equivalent electrical circuit diagram in Fig. 5.60. Eq. (5.146) can be interpreted as the current with a potential“ Hi splitting at a node into wires with the “geometric ” resistances” (1/Ai Fij ) to the “potentials” Hj , see Fig. 5.61. The wire possible for Fii = 0 is missing, as due to Hj = Hi no “current” ﬂows. The radiative exchange in the enclosure from Fig. 5.59 can be replaced by the circuit diagram from Fig. 5.62. As the reradiating wall has no current, (Q˙ R = 0), the current Q˙ 1 of potential 4 σT1 ﬂows to the node H1 , where it branches oﬀ, it ﬂows directly and via HR to the node H2 and ﬁnally reaches the potential σT24 . Three resistances, placed one behind the other, lie between the end points with the potentials σT14 and σT24 , whereby, because of the branching of the current, the central resistance (A1 F 12 )−1 between H1 and H2 is made up of the three individual resistances (A1 F12)−1 , (A1 F1R )−1 and (A2 F2R)−1 . As three series resistances are added, it holds that Q˙ 1 =

σ (T14 − T24) . 1 − ε1 1 1 − ε2 + + ε1 A1 ε2 A2 A1 F 12

(5.148)

626

5 Thermal radiation

With parallel resistances the conductances are added together; it then follows that A1 F 12 = A1 F12 +

(A1 F1R)

−1

1 −1 . + (A2 F2R)

(5.149)

This relationship for F 12 agrees with (5.140), which was derived in a diﬀerent manner. If both surfaces 1 and 2 are ﬂat or convex (F11 = 0 and F22 = 0), then A1 F 12 can, according to (5.141), be calculated using only F12, A1 and A2 . Equation (5.148) is often written in the form Q˙ 1 = ε12 A1 σ T14 − T24 , (5.150) through which the radiative exchange factor ε12 is deﬁned. From (5.148) we get 1 1 − ε1 1 1 − ε2 = + + . ε12 A1 ε1 A1 ε2 A2 A1 F 12

(5.151)

For emissivities dependent on the temperature, ε1 = ε1(T1 ) and ε2 = ε2 (T2 ) should be used. No current, Q˙ R = 0, ﬂows between the nodes with the potentials σTR4 and HR , cf. Fig. 5.62. The resistance (1 − εR )/εR AR therefore has no eﬀect and σTR4 = HR is valid. The temperature TR of a reradiating wall presents itself independent of its emissivity εR . The radiosity HR required for its determination is found from the balance A1 F1R (H1 − HR ) = A2 F2R (HR − H2 ) , read oﬀ Fig. 5.62 as HR = σTR4 =

A1 F1R H1 + A2 F2RH2 . A1 F1R + A2 F2R

(5.152)

The radiosities H1 and H2 are obtained from (5.146) for i = 1 and i = 2, with Q˙ 1 from (5.150) and Q˙ 2 = −Q˙ 1 .

Fig. 5.62: Equivalent electrical circuit diagram for the radiative exchange in a hollow enclosure according to Fig. 5.59

5.5 Radiative exchange

627

Example 5.11: The electrically heated oven in Fig. 5.63a is used for the surface treatment of thin, square metal plates that are covered on both sides. The oven has a square base of side length a = 1.50 m. The radiation emitting surface of the heating elements has emissivity ε = 0.85; their distance from the metal plate is b = 0.25 m. 12.5 kW power is supplied to each of the two rows of heating elements being well insulated against the exterior. The non-insulated side walls of the oven have emissivity ε = 0.70. At steady-state the surface temperature of the heating elements reaches 750 K. Determine the temperature of the side walls and the temperature of the covered metal plate.

Fig. 5.63: a Electrically heated oven for the surface treatment of metal plates, b Hollow enclosure for the calculation of the radiative exchange of the top half of the oven The symmetry of the construction means that it is suﬃcient to just consider the top half of the oven. It forms the schematically illustrated enclosure in Fig. 5.63b. It is bounded at the top by the heated square 1 with ε1 = 0.85, at the side by the rectangular areas 2 with ε2 = 0.70, which release heat to the outside, and below by the metal plate R. It is adiabatic as a result of symmetry, and represents a reradiating wall. We will assign the approximately uniform temperatures T1 , T2 and TR to these surfaces, such that the radiative exchange in a hollow enclosure bounded by three zones is to be calculated according to (5.148) or (5.151). The ﬁrst step is the determination of the view factors required for (5.149), F12 , F1R and F2R . The easiest to calculate is the view factor F1R between two parallel squares lying one above the other (side length a) from Table 5.9. With x = y = a/b = 6.0 we obtain, from 2

1 + x2 2 1 x 2 arctan √ F1R = ln + 2x 1 + x − 2x arctan x , πx2 2 1 + 2x2 1 + x2 the value F1R = 0.7326. As F11 = 0, then F12 = 1 − F1R = 0.2674. In order to determine F2R , we consider that due to symmetry FR2 = F12 is valid. Using the reciprocity rule (5.132), it then follows, with AR = A1 = a2 and A2 = 4ab, that F2R =

AR A1 a F12 = 0.4011 . FR2 = F12 = A2 A2 4b

This yields from (5.149) the modiﬁed view factor F 12 = 0.4633. We now calculate the radiative exchange factor ε12 from (5.151) and obtain 1 = 1.3234 m−2 ε12 A1

and

ε12 = 0.3358 .

The temperature T2 of the four side walls is calculated from (5.150) with Q˙ 1 = 12, 5 kW: T24 = T14 −

Q˙ 1 . ε12 A1 σ

628

5 Thermal radiation

This gives T2 = 396.3 K. The temperature TR of the covered metal plates is obtained from their radiosity HR as TR = (HR /σ)1/4 . (5.153) The radiosities H1 and H2 are required for the calculation of HR from (5.152). They are found from (5.146) to be H1 = σT14 −

1 − ε1 ˙ kW Q1 = 16.96 2 ε1 A1 m

and because Q˙ 2 = −Q˙ 1 H2 = σT24 +

1 − ε2 ˙ kW Q1 = 4.970 2 . ε2 A2 m

It then follows from (5.152) that HR = 13.75 kW/m2 and ﬁnally from (5.153), TR = 702 K.

5.5.3.3

Radiative exchange in a hollow enclosure with two zones

The relationships derived in the last section for the heat ﬂow, Q˙ 1, transferred from a radiation emitter 1 to a receiver 2, are also valid for an enclosure that is only bounded by these two zones. As no reradiating zone is present, with F1R = 0 and F2R = 0 from (5.149), F 12 = F12 is obtained. The heat ﬂow transferred from 1 to 2 is Q˙ 1 = ε12 A1 σ T14 − T24 . (5.154) The radiative exchange factor ε12 is yielded from (5.151) to be 1 1 1 A1 1 = + −1+ −1 . ε12 F12 ε1 A2 ε2

(5.155)

These equations hold for several important, practical cases: 1. The area 1 is completely enclosed by the area 2, so that F12 = 1. For the radiative exchange factor we have now 1 1 A1 1 = + −1 . (5.156) ε12 ε1 A2 ε2 This result holds in particular for concentric spheres and very long concentric cylinders, as here the assumption of isothermal surfaces applies more easily. If, however, body 1 lies eccentric in the enclosure surrounded by body 2, Fig. 5.64, then the two surfaces will generally not be isothermal, as the radiation ﬂow is much higher in the regions where the two surfaces are close to each other than where a large distance exists between them.

Fig. 5.64: Enclosure surrounded by body 2 with an eccentrically placed body 1

5.5 Radiative exchange

629

2. Surface 2 completely surrounds surface 1, (F12 = 1), and is black: ε2 = 1. It now follows from (5.156) that ε12 = ε1, the simple equation Q˙ 1 = ε1 A1 σ T14 − T24 (5.157) for the transferred heat ﬂow. As the surrounding shell does not reﬂect any radiation, the size A2 of its surface has no eﬀect on the radiative exchange. 3. Area 2 completely encloses area 1, (F12 = 1), and its surface is much larger than that of area 1: A2 A1. With A1 /A2 → 0 it follows from (5.156) that ε12 = ε1 , with (5.157) for the heat ﬂow. The radiative properties of a very large shell do not have any inﬂuence. The shell 2 appears like a black body to the small body 1. 4. For two very large, parallel plates, F12 = 1 is likewise valid, and in addition A1 = A2 . From (5.156) the radiative exchange factor is found to be 1 1 1 = + −1 . ε12 ε1 ε2

(5.158)

The second of these special cases of the body 1, completely enclosed by a black radiating shell 2, can also be generalised for an enclosed body with any radiative properties. The radiation ﬂow emitted by it is Φ1 = A1 ε1 (T1 )σT14 . The black shell absorbs this radiation ﬂow completely. It emits the radiation ﬂow A2 σT24 itself, of which the proportion F21 strikes body 1. Body 1 absorbs the following radiation ﬂow from the black radiation striking it Φ21 = a1 (T1 , T2 )A2 F21 σT24 . Here, a1 (T1 , T2 ) is the hemispherical total absorptivity of body 1 for black radiation at temperature T2 . This gives Q˙ 1 = Φ1 − Φ21 = ε1 (T1 )A1 σT14 − a1 (T1 , T2 )A2 F21 σT24

(5.159)

for the heat ﬂow transferred from body 1 to the black shell 2. We will now consider the limiting case T2 = T1 , for which Q˙ 1 = 0. Eq. (5.159) yields a1 (T1 , T2 )A2 F21 = ε1 (T1 )A1 .

(5.160)

According to section 5.3.2.2, the hemispherical total absorptivity of a body with any radiative properties is equal to its hemispherical total emissivity, if radiation from a black body at the same temperature strikes the body. This is the case here. It therefore follows from (5.160) that A2 F21 = A1 . This corresponds to the reciprocity rule (5.132) with F12 = 1. Its application to this case was however not assured from the start as the intensity of body 1 is not constant. We obtain now, as a generalisation of (5.157) (5.161) Q˙ 1 = A1 σ ε1 (T1 ) T14 − a1 (T1 , T2 ) T24 . For a grey Lambert radiator the absorptivity a1 for every incident radiation is the same as the emissivity ε1 (T1 ), so that (5.157) is once again yielded.

630

5.5.3.4

5 Thermal radiation

The equation system for the radiative exchange between any number of zones

In complicated geometries the boundary walls of an enclosure must be divided into several zones. Non-isothermal walls also have to be split into a number of isothermal surfaces (= zones) in order to increase the accuracy of the results13 . The equivalent electrical circuit diagram introduced in 5.5.3.2 would be confusing for this case. It is more sensible to set up and then solve a system of linear equation for the n radiosities of the n zones. The diﬃculty here is not the solving of the large number of equations in the system, but is the determination of the n2 view factors that appear. For n zones, 2n equations (5.144) and (5.145) with i = 1, 2, . . . n are valid. They are rearranged so that a system of n equations is yielded for the n radiosities Hi . The solution of this system of equations gives, from (5.144), the heat ﬂow Q˙ i for each zone where the temperature Ti is given. The temperature of a zone with stipulated heat ﬂow Q˙ i is found by solving (5.144) for Ti4 : 1 1 − εi (Ti ) Q˙ i 4 Hi + Ti = . (5.162) σ εi (Ti ) Ai If, as this equation indicates, the emissivity εi depends on the temperature, iteration is required. In order to obtain the equation system for the radiosities, (5.145) is rearranged: Hi −

n

Fij Hj = Q˙ i /Ai .

(5.163)

for i = j for i = j

(5.164)

j=1

With the Kronecker symbol

δij =

the linear equation follows

n

0 1

(δij − Fij ) Hj = Q˙ i /Ai .

(5.165)

j=1

It is used for the zones of the enclosure with given heat ﬂow Q˙ i and for which the temperature Ti has to be determined. For the zones where the temperature Ti is given, the unknown Q˙ i is eliminated by setting (5.144) equal to (5.145). After canceling Ai this yields Hi −

n

Fij Hj =

j=1

from which follows Hi − (1 − εi )

εi 4 σTi − Hi ; 1 − εi

n

Fij Hj = εi σTi4

j=1 13 For demands of high accuracy, even this procedure of splitting the area with continuously varying temperature into a ﬁnite number of zones has to be avoided. However, the correct method for non-isothermal areas leads to complicated mathematical relationships (integral equations), which we will not go into here; [5.45], p. 107–132 is suggested for further reading.

5.5 Radiative exchange

631

or with the Kronecker symbol from (5.164) n

[δij − (1 − εi ) Fij ] Hj = εi σTi4 .

(5.166)

j=1

This equation, linear in the radiosity, is used for the zones where the temperature Ti is given, with which εi (Ti ) can also be found, so all the coeﬃcients and the right hand side are known. The zones 1, 2, . . . m shall have given temperatures and the zones m + 1, m + 2, . . . n shall have stipulated heat ﬂows. The linear equation system for the radiosities becomes n

[δij − (1 − εi ) Fij ] Hj = εi σTi4

,

i = 1, 2, . . . m

(5.167)

j=1

and

n

(δij − Fij ) Hj = Q˙ i /Ai

,

i = m + 1, m + 2, . . . n .

(5.168)

j=1

This can be solved using known methods of linear algebra. With the radiosities Hi , the heat ﬂows Q˙ i for i = 1, 2, . . . m are found using (5.144) and the temperatures Ti for i = m + 1, m + 2, . . . n from (5.162). If some of the m areas with given temperatures are black, then the associated equations (5.167) with εi = 1 are reduced to Hi = σTi4 . These radiosities are known from the start so the number of unknown radiosities is accordingly reduced. Eq. (5.144) is not suitable for the calculation of heat ﬂows Q˙ i for black bodies; Q˙ i is determined from the less convenient relationship (5.163). Example 5.12: The radiative exchange in the hollow cylinder (r = 0.10 m; h = 0.25 m) from Examples 5.9 and 5.10 is to be investigated further. End 1 is black (as in Example 5.10), (ε1 = 1) and has a temperature T1 = 550 K. The other end has emissivity ε2 = 0.75 and temperature T2 = 300 K. The body area is adiabatic. In order to obtain higher accuracy the reradiating body area is split into equally sized zones 3 and 4, the position of which is indicated in Fig. 5.65. The heat ﬂows Q˙ 1 and Q˙ 2 and the temperatures T3 and T4 of the two reradiating zones are to be determined.

Fig. 5.65: Hollow cylinder with ends 1 and 2. The reradiating body area is divided into two equally sized zones 3 and 4. 5 is an imaginary auxiliary area for the calculation of the view factors Before we set up the equation system for the radiosities of the four zones we will calculate the 16 view factors Fij . Obviously F11 = F22 = 0; the view factor F12 = 0.1230 is carried over from Example 5.9. In order to determine the other view factors the auxiliary area 5 in Fig. 5.65 with the dashed line is introduced. With z = 2 + (h/2r)2 = 3.5625, F15 is calculated from the equation given in Example 5.9 as F15 = 0.3072. For the enclosure formed by 1, 3 and 5 we have F13 + F15 = 1, from which F13 = 0.6928. The summation for the entire cylinder is F11 + F12 + F13 + F14 = 1 ,

632

5 Thermal radiation

from which F14 = 0.1841 is obtained. Due to symmetry with respect to the auxiliary area 5, the view factors for area 2 are obtained from those calculated for 1 as F21 = F12 ; F22 = F11 = 0; F23 = F14 ; F24 = F13 . The reciprocity rule is used for the determination of the view factors for area 3. This gives F31 = (A1 /A3 )F13 = (r/h)F13 = 0.2771 as well as F32 = (A2 /A3 )F23 = (r/h)F14 = 0.0736. Coming back to the enclosure formed by 1, 3 and 5, the summation rule F31 + F33 + F35 = 1 gives, because of F35 = F31 (symmetry!), the view factor F33 = 1 − 2F31 = 0.4458. The corresponding summation for the entire cylinder yields F34 = 1 − F31 − F32 − F33 = 0.2035 . Symmetry is also the reason for the view factors for area 4 being F41 = F32 ; F42 = F31 ; F43 = F34 and F44 = F33 . Combining these results into a matrix makes things a lot clearer: ⎡ ⎤ 0 0.1230 0.6928 0.1841 ⎢ 0.1230 0 0.1841 0.6928 ⎥ ⎥ (Fij ) = ⎢ ⎣ 0.2771 0.0736 0.4458 0.2035 ⎦ . 0.0736 0.2771 0.2035 0.4458 As area 1 is black, the ﬁrst of the two equations (5.167) is reduced to H1 = σT14 = 5188.9 W/m

2

.

The second equation from (5.167) with i = m = 2 and the two equations (5.168), with Q˙ 3 = Q˙ 4 = 0, take the form H2 −F32 H2 −F42 H2

− (1 − ε2 ) F23 H3 + (1 − F33 ) H3 − F43 H3

− − +

(1 − ε2 ) F24 H4 F34 H4 (1 − F44 ) H4

= = =

ε2 σT24 + (1 − ε2 ) F21 H1 F31 H1 F41 H1 .

With the values given and those already calculated we get H2

− 0.0460 H3

− 0.1732 H4

=

504.0

W/m

2

−0.0736 H2

+ 0.5542 H3

− 0.2035 H4

=

1437.8

W/m

2

−0.2771 H2

− 0.2035 H3

+ 0.5542 H4

=

381.9

2

W/m2 .

2

2

with the solution H2 = 1126.8 W/m , H3 = 3703.3 W/m and H4 = 2612.3 W/m . The heat ﬂow from the black area 1 is calculated from (5.163) to be Q˙ 1 = A1 (H1 − F12 H2 − F13 H3 − F14 H4 ) = 62.9 W . The heat ﬂow of the other end is yielded from (5.144) as A2 ε2 4 Q˙ 2 = σT2 − H2 = −62.9 W . 1 − ε2 It is the same, as it has to be, as −Q˙ 1 . The temperatures of the reradiating walls 3 and 4 are found from Hi = σTi4 as T3 = 506 K and T4 = 463 K. As expected area 3, that is closer to the hot end 1, has a higher temperature than area 4. We will now compare these results with the rough approximation in which the body area is treated as a single, reradiating zone of temperature TR . From (5.150) and (5.151) we get Q˙ 1 = −Q˙ 2 = 70.3 W, a value greater by almost 12 %. The temperature of the body area of TR = 474 K lies between T3 and T4 .

5.5 Radiative exchange

5.5.4

633

Protective radiation shields

Protective radiation shields are used to reduce the radiative exchange between walls at diﬀerent temperatures: thin foils or sheets made of good reﬂecting materials are placed between the walls, Fig. 5.66. The spaces between the protective shields are normally evacuated so that heat transfer by convection is prevented. This multi-layer arrangement is used predominantly in cryogenic applications for the insulation of containers for very cold liquiﬁed gases. The heat ﬂux transferred between two very large, parallel, ﬂat walls, according to (5.154) and (5.158), is given by q˙ =

Q˙ σ (T14 − T24 ) = . 1 1 A + −1 ε1 ε2

(5.169)

We will now consider the case of N radiation shields present between the walls 1 and 2. The emissivity εS shall have the same value on both sides of the shield and for all shields. As the shields are very thin, each shield can have a uniform temperature assigned to it. The following equations are obtained with TSi as the temperature of the i-th shield: 1 1 4 + − 1 = σ (T14 − TS1 ) , q˙ ε1 εS 1 1 4 4 q˙ + − 1 = σ (TS1 − TS2 ) , εS εS ....................... , 1 1 4 q˙ + − 1 = σ (TSN − T24 ) . εS ε2 The temperatures of the shields drop out of the right hand side when all the

Fig. 5.66: a Flat radiation shields between two ﬂat parallel walls 1 and 2. b Concentric radiation shields between concentric spheres or very long cylinders 1 and 2

634

5 Thermal radiation

equations are added together, giving q˙

1 1 + −1+N ε1 ε2

or

2 −1 = σ T14 − T24 εS

σ (T14 − T24) . 1 1 2 + −1+N −1 ε1 ε2 εS

q˙ (N ) =

(5.170)

As can immediately be seen, the heat ﬂux is signiﬁcantly reduced compared to the case without protective shields (N = 0). Table 5.10 shows examples for εS = 0.05, of how the ratio q(N ˙ )/q(N ˙ = 0) decreases with N for diﬀerent emissivities ε1 = ε2 of the outer walls. According to this, the eﬀect of shielding is greater, the higher the emissivity ε1 = ε2 . Table 5.10: Ratio of the heat ﬂux q(N ˙ ) for N protective shields with εS = 0.05 to the heat ﬂux q(N ˙ = 0) without protective shields between two ﬂat walls with ε1 = ε2 = ε ε

N =1

2

5

10

20

50

0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

0.3276 0.1875 0.0930 0.0565 0.0370 0.0250

0.1959 0.1034 0.0488 0.0290 0.0189 0.0127

0.0888 0.0441 0.0201 0.0118 0.0076 0.0051

0.04645 0.02256 0.01015 0.00595 0.00383 0.00256

0.02378 0.01141 0.00510 0.00298 0.00192 0.00128

0.00965 0.00459 0.00205 0.00120 0.00077 0.00052

We will now look at the radiative exchange between concentric cylinders or spheres. The heat ﬂow transferred calculated from (5.154) and (5.156) is Q˙ =

A1 σ (T14 − T24) . A1 1 1 + −1 ε1 A2 ε2

(5.171)

N very thin protective shields with the same emissivity εS are placed concentrically between the cylinders or spheres. Following the same procedure as for ﬂat radiation protection shields gives the reduced heat ﬂow Q˙ = A1 1 + ε1 A2

A1 σ (T14 − T24) . N 2 A1 1 −1 + −1 ε2 εS ASi i=1

(5.172)

Here, A1 is the surface area of the inner wall and the index i of the shields rises from inside to outside.

5.5 Radiative exchange

635

Surfaces with low emissivities often exhibit approximately mirrorlike or specular reﬂection rather than diﬀuse reﬂection. We want to investigate how the assumption of mirrorlike reﬂection aﬀects the heat transfer. The assumptions regarding the emission of diﬀuse and grey radiation remain unaltered. Grey Lambert radiators with mirrorlike reﬂection are therefore assumed. As the pathways between two large, ﬂat plates drawn schematically in Fig. 5.67 show, the radiation emitted by plate 1 always strikes plate 2 and continues to be reﬂected between the plates until it has been completely absorbed. The same is true for the radiation emitted by plate 2. The heat transfer is not diﬀerent from that by diﬀuse reﬂection and equation (5.169) for the heat ﬂux holds, regardless of whether one or both walls reﬂect diﬀusely or mirrorlike. The relevant relationship (5.170) for the heat ﬂux with N radiation shields is applied without any changes for mirrorlike reﬂection. It is also valid when only the shields reﬂect mirrorlike and the plates diﬀusely.

Fig. 5.67: Radiation pathways for mirrorlike reﬂection between two large, ﬂat, parallel walls 1 and 2

Fig. 5.68 illustrates the radiation pathways between two concentric cylinders or spheres that reﬂect like mirrors. The radiation emitted from the inner area 1, (pathway a), always strikes the outer area 2 and is reﬂected such that it strikes area 1 again. F12 = 1 is valid. As in diﬀuse reﬂection, the radiation emitted by the inner area is continuously reﬂected between the two surfaces until it is completely absorbed. This is diﬀerent for the radiation emitted by the outer area 2; it either strikes the inner surface or bypasses it and falls back on the outer surface 2. This part, pathway b in Fig. 5.68, is specularly reﬂected in such a way that it never leaves area 2. It does not participate in the radiative exchange between the surfaces. The other part, given by the view factor F21 = A1 F12 /A2 = A1 /A2 , (pathway c), strikes area 1 and is mirrorlike reﬂected between the surfaces until it is completely absorbed. Therefore, the outer surface only contributes to the radiative exchange by mirrorlike reﬂection, on the scale as if its surface A2 was reduced by the factor F21 : it has the eﬀective surface area A2 F21 = A1 . Therefore, if the outer surface 2 reﬂects mirrorlike, in the following equation for the heat ﬂow, from (5.148) with F¯12 = F12 = 1, Q˙ =

σ (T14 − T24) , 1 − ε1 1 1 − ε2 + + ε1 A1 A1 ε2 A2

636

5 Thermal radiation

Fig. 5.68: Ray pathways in mirrorlike reﬂection between concentric spheres or very long cylinders 1 and 2

in the third “resistance” of the denominator the area A2 should be replaced by the eﬀective area A1 , yielding A1 σ (T14 − T24) Q˙ = . 1 1 + −1 ε1 ε2

(5.173)

The size of the outer area 2 is immaterial for radiative exchange. Eq. (5.173) also holds if the inner surface 1 reﬂects diﬀusely. N concentric, thin radiation shields, with the same emissivity εS , are placed between the (diﬀuse or mirrorlike reﬂecting) inner area 1 and the diﬀuse reﬂecting outer area 2. The shields reﬂect mirrorlike. According to (5.173), the following balance equations hold Q˙ 1 1 + −1 A1 ε1 εS ˙ 2 Q −1 AS1 εS

4 = σ T14 − TS1 , 4 4 , = σ TS1 − TS2

................................

4 2 4 , −1 = σ TSN −1 − TSN ASN −1 εS 4 Q˙ ASN 1 1 + − 1 = σ TSN − T24 . ASN εS A2 ε2 Q˙

The temperatures of the shields drop out when the equations are added together giving A1 σ T14 − T24 ˙ )= . (5.174) Q(N N −1 A1 2 A1 1 1 1 A1 1+ −1 + −1 + −1 + ε1 A2 ε2 εS ASi εS ASN i=1 If the outer area 2 also reﬂects mirrorlike then A2 in the second term of the denominator should be replaced by ASN because this is the size of the eﬀective surface area of 2 for mirrorlike reﬂection.

5.6 Gas radiation

637

Example 5.13: A tube, with liquid nitrogen ﬂowing through it, has an external diameter d1 = 30 mm. It emissivity is ε1 = 0.075 and its temperature T1 = 80 K. The tube is surrounded by a second concentric tube with internal diameter d2 = 60 mm with ε2 = 0.12 and T2 = 295 K. The space between them has been evacuated. Determine the heat ﬂow per tube length L that is transferred by radiation. The limiting cases of diﬀuse and mirrorlike reﬂection of the outer tube should be investigated. With diﬀuse reﬂection, the desired heat ﬂow is obtained from (5.171) to be πd1 σ T14 − T24 Q˙ W = −2.368 = . 1 d1 1 L m + −1 ε1 d 2 ε2 The minus sign indicates that the heat is transferred from outside to inside. The inner tube is cooled by the liquid nitrogen. In the case of mirrorlike reﬂection, from (5.173), the ˙ smaller value Q/L = −1.948 W/m is obtained. As only a part of the outer area contributes to radiative exchange the insulation eﬀect is greater. A thin radiation protective shield of diameter dS = 45 mm is introduced between the tubes to improve the insulation of the nitrogen pipe. This shield reﬂects like a mirror; its emissivity is εS = 0.025. Find the decrease in the incident heat ﬂow. Eqn. (5.174) with N = 1 is applied here, so that in the denominator the sum drops out: πd1 σ T14 − T24 Q˙ (N = 1) W = = −0.487 . 1 d1 1 1 d1 L m + −1 + 1+ −1 ε1 d2 ε2 εS ds This holds for the diﬀuse reﬂecting outer cylinder. The heat ﬂow has decreased signiﬁcantly. ˙ ˙ The ratio Q(N = 1)/Q(N = 0) has the value 0.487/2.368 = 0.206. With a mirrorlike ˙ reﬂecting outer cylinder d2 is replaced by dS . This then gives Q(N = 1)/L = −0.480 W/m ˙ ˙ and Q(N = 1)/Q(N = 0) = 0.480/1.948 = 0.246. In specular reﬂection of the outer cylinder, the relative decrease of the heat ﬂow caused by the protective shield is somewhat lower than that for a diﬀuse reﬂecting outer cylinder. However, the smallest absolute value ˙ of Q/L is yielded when both the shield and the outer cylinder reﬂect mirrorlike.

5.6

Gas radiation

A. Schack [5.52] was the ﬁrst to recognise the technical importance of radiation from gases in 1924. He suggested that the radiation of the CO2 and H2 O in combustion gases would contribute signiﬁcantly to heat transfer in industrial ovens and in furnaces of steam generators. This was conﬁrmed experimentally and between 1932 and 1942 the radiation of these gases was systematically investigated. The work by E. Schmidt [5.53] and E. Eckert [5.54], [5.55], in Germany and that by H.C. Hottel and his coworkers, [5.56] to [5.58], in the USA were of particular importance. In technical applications, the gas radiation in the infrared, i.e. at wavelengths above 1 μm is of interest. In this region, the main emitters are CO2 and H2 O, although other gases like CO, SO2 , NH3 , CH4 and further hydrocarbons also emit here. In contrast, N2 and O2 , the main constituents of air allow radiation in the

638

5 Thermal radiation

infrared region to pass through with virtually no attenuation; they do not absorb, and therefore according to Kirchhoﬀ’s law do not emit either. Gases only absorb and emit radiation in narrow wavelength regions, so-called bands. Their spectral emissivities show a complex dependency on the wavelength, in complete contrast to solid bodies. This means that gases cannot be idealised as grey radiators without a loss of accuracy. In the following we will deal with the absorption of radiation by gases and then look at the deﬁnitions of the absorptivities and emissivities of radiating gas spaces. These quantities are dependent on the size and shape of the gas space; their calculation entails complicated integrations. This is avoided by introducing the mean beam length of the gas space, the determination of which will also be explained here. This allows radiative exchange between isothermal gas volumes and their boundary walls to be calculated. Finally we will give some hints how radiative exchange in complicated cases, for example in combustion chambers and furnaces, can be determined.

5.6.1

Absorption coeﬃcient and optical thickness

If radiation passes through an optically turbid gas or mixture of gases its energy is reduced due to absorption and scattering by the gas molecules. We will now assume that the radiation is only absorbed but not scattered. This applies to the infrared wavelengths because Rayleigh scattering by the molecules only takes place at very small wavelengths and is practically meaningless for λ > 1 μm, cf. 5.4.2.2. In the gas mixture being considered, only one component may absorb radiant energy, for example CO2 in the non-absorbing components N2 and O2 .

Fig. 5.69: Reduction in the spectral intensity Lλ with increasing beam length s as a result of absorption by a gas

Absorption causes a reduction in the spectral intensity Lλ with increasing beam length s of the gas, Fig. 5.69. This fall in the spectral intensity as radiation passes through the distance ds is described by −

dLλ = kG (λ, T, p, pG ) ds , Lλ

(5.175)

through which the spectral absorption coeﬃcient kG of the absorbing gas is deﬁned. It is dependent on the wavelength λ and the state of the gas, namely on its

5.6 Gas radiation

639

temperature T , the pressure p and the partial pressure pG , which is a measure of the concentration of the absorbing gas in the mixture. In order to simplify the expression, we generally do without writing the dependency in an explicit way. We simply write kG instead of kG (λ, T, p, pG ). In a non-homogeneous gas mixture the properties vary along the path followed by the radiation. The absorption coeﬃcient therefore has an indirect dependence on s. Integration of (5.175) between s = 0 and s yields Lλ(s) ln =− Lλ (s = 0)

s kG ds 0

or

s Lλ (s) = Lλ (s = 0) exp(− kG ds) .

(5.176)

0

The integral

s κG :=

kG (λ, T, p, pG ) ds

(5.177)

0

is known as the optical thickness of the gas layer with the (geometric) thickness given by s. In contrast to s, κG is a dimensionless quantity; it is a measure of the strength of the absorption of a gas layer of certain thickness s. A gas with κG → 0 is called optically thin. With κG = 7, Lλ (s) falls to less than 1 per thousend of the initial value Lλ (s = 0); the gas almost completely absorbs the penetrating radiation. A homogeneous gas mixture has constant intensive properties T , p and pG over its entire volume. Its spectral absorption coeﬃcient kG is, therefore, independent of s. So, from (5.177), the optical thickness is found to be κG = kG (λ, T, p, pG ) s = kG s ,

(5.178)

and the decrease in the spectral intensity as Lλ (s) = Lλ (s = 0) exp (−kG s) .

(5.179)

This equation corresponds to the law from P. Bouguer (1729), according to which the spectral intensity falls exponentially along the path radiation is passing through. As the absorption of radiation takes place on the individual molecules of the gas, the assumption is suggested, that the spectral absorption coeﬃcient κG is proportional to the molar concentration cG = NG /V of the absorbing molecules or to the partial pressure pG = Rm T cG . The optical thickness of a homogeneous gas is then given by ∗ (λ, T, p)(pG s) , κ G = kG s = k G

(5.180)

that is a proportionality to the product (pG s). This is known as the law from A. Beer (1854). It applies to some gases, e.g. CO2 , very well, but from other gases, in particular H2 O, it is not satisﬁed.

640

5 Thermal radiation

The spectral absorption coeﬃcient kG is also decisive for the radiation energy emitted by a volume element of the gas. d2 Φλ,V indicates the radiation ﬂow emitted by a volume element dV of a homogeneous gas in the wavelength interval dλ into all directions. It holds for this that d2 Φλ,V = 4 π kG Lλs (λ, T ) dV dλ = 4 kG Mλs (λ, T ) dV dλ .

(5.181)

The spectral intensity Lλs and the hemispherical spectral emissive power Mλs of a black body are given here by (5.50). A derivation of (5.181) can be found in R. Siegel and J.R. Howell [5.37], p. 531.

5.6.2

Absorptivity and emissivity

The enclosure schematically illustrated in Fig. 5.70 contains a homogeneous gas mixture with an absorbent component. The element dA on the surface of the gas volume, shown in Fig. 5.70, will be used for the deﬁnition and calculation of its directional spectral absorptivity aλ,G . The radiation emitted from dA, with the spectral intensity Lλ , is weakened by absorption. Depending on the direction, the path through the gas is of diﬀerent lengths, which according to (5.179) leads to varying reductions in Lλ .

Fig. 5.70: For the calculation of the spectral absorptivity in a gas space

The spectral absorptivity aλ,G belonging to a certain direction is the ratio of the energy absorbed in the distance s, to the energy emitted: aλ,G :=

Lλ (s) Lλ (s = 0) − Lλ (s) =1− = 1 − τλ,G . Lλ (s = 0) Lλ (s = 0)

(5.182)

. For a The ratio Lλ (s)/Lλ (s = 0) is the directional spectral transmissivity τλ,G homogeneous gas or gas mixture, we obtain from (5.179)

aλ,G (λ, s, T, p, pG ) = aλ,G (kG s) = 1 − exp (−kG s) .

(5.183)

The directional spectral absorptivity is a property (variable of state) of the absorbing gas. Its direction dependence manifests itself in the dependence on the beam length s, through which the radiation passes in the gas. According to Kirchhoﬀ’s law, cf. section 5.3.2.1., the directional spectral emissivity ελ,G of a gas is equal to its directional spectral absorptivity: ελ,G (λ, T, p, pG , s) = ελ,G (kG s) = aλ,G (kG s) = 1 − exp (−kG s) .

(5.184)

5.6 Gas radiation

641

Fig. 5.71: Directional spectral emissivity ελ,CO2 of carbon dioxide at T = 294 K and p = 10.13 bar for a beam length s = 0.38 m according to D.K. Edwards [5.65]

ελ,G is a property of the gas that additionally depends on the (direction dependent) beam length s. As an example, Fig. 5.71 shows the directional emissivity of CO2 at T = 294 K and p = 10.13 bar. The emission bands are clearly recognisable. With ελ,G , the radiation ﬂow d3Φλ,G received by an element dA on the surface of the gas volume, in the wavelength interval dλ, from the solid angle element dω highlighted in Fig. 5.72, can be calculated. According to (5.4), the deﬁning equation for the spectral intensity, it holds for this that d3Φλ,G = ελ,G (kG s) Lλs (λ, T ) dλ dω cos β dA ,

(5.185)

where Lλs is the spectral intensity of a black body. In order to determine the radiation ﬂow d2 Φλ,G that strikes dA from the entire gas space, d3 Φλ,G has to be integrated over all the solid angles coming from dA with their associated beam lengths s, that is over the whole gas space: 2 d Φλ,G = ελ,G (kG s) cos β dω Lλs (λ, T ) dλ dA . (5.186)

Analogous to the hemispherical spectral emissivity of a solid, cf. Table 5.4, through 1 V ε (kG s) cos β dω (5.187) ελ,G (kG L0 ) := π λ,G the spectral emissivity of the gas volume for the radiation on an element dA of its surface is deﬁned. It depends on the shape of the gas space, the position of

Fig. 5.72: Gas space with surface element dA and associated solid angle element dω

642

5 Thermal radiation

the surface element dA and on the optical thickness κG = kG L0 . Here L0 is a characteristic length for the gas space. The spectral irradiance of the surface element as a result of the gas radiation, with Mλs = πLλs , is Eλ,G =

d2 Φλ,G = εV λ,G (kG L0 )Mλs (λ, T ) . dA dλ

(5.188)

Integration of Eλ,G over all wavelengths, taking kG = kG (λ, T, p, pG ) into account, yields the (total) irradiance of dA: EG =

dΦG V 4 . = εV G (T, p, pG , L0 ) Ms (T ) = εG (T, p, pG , L0 ) σT dA

In which εV G (T, p, pG , L0 )

1 := Ms (T )

(5.189)

∞ εV λ,G (kG L0 ) Mλs (λ, T ) dλ

(5.190)

0

is the total emissivity of the gas volume for its radiation on an element dA of its surface. εV G also depends on the form of the gas space, which is expressed in the formula by the dependence on the characteristic length L0 . As the emissivity of the gas radiation depends on the shape of the gas space, it is not purely a material property like the emissivity of solid surfaces. The dependence on the shape of the gas space is especially easy to consider for radiation from a hemisphere of gas on the surface element at the centre of the sphere, see Fig. 5.73. The directional spectral emissivity ελ,G is independent of direction here, because the beam length s is equal to the radius R for all directions. It follows V from (5.187) that simply εV λ,G = ελ,G (kG R). In this case ελ,G is termed the spectral emissivity ελ,G of the gas, for which, according to (5.184) ελ,G (kG R) = 1 − exp (−kG R)

(5.191)

holds, treating ελ,G as a gas property, even though ελ,G is the spectral emissivity of a gas hemisphere that radiates on the surface element at its centre.

Fig. 5.73: Radiation of a gas hemisphere with the radius R on a surface element dA at the centre of the sphere

The total emissivity of the radiating hemisphere is yielded from (5.190), with εV λ,G = ελ,G (kG R) from (5.191), as 1 εG (T, p, pG , R) = σT 4

∞ [1 − exp (−kG R)] Mλs (λ, T ) dλ . 0

(5.192)

5.6 Gas radiation

643

This emissivity is also viewed as a material property. The next section contains graphs from which εG for CO2 and H2 O can be taken. The validity of Beer’s law means that εG depends on the product pG R, such that εG = εG (T, p, pG R) holds. As we will show in section 5.6.4, the complicated determination of the emisV sivities εV λ,G and εG of any shape of gas space can be traced back to the “standard case” of the gas hemisphere we have just dealt with. A mean beam length sm is determined for the gas space under consideration from the following condition: a gas hemisphere with the radius R = sm should give rise to the same spectral irradiance on a surface element at its centre as that for the radiation from any shaped gas volume on a certain element of its surface. As follows from (5.188) and (5.191) εV (5.193) λ,G (kG L0 ) = ελ,G (kG sm ) = 1 − exp (−kG sm ) can then be set, and from (5.189) and (5.192) it follows that εV G (T, p, pG , L0 ) = εG (T, p, pG , sm ) .

(5.194)

This avoids the integration required in (5.187) and (5.190) over all solid angles and wavelengths respectively. The graphs from the next section can be used to determine εG , thereby making it easy to ﬁnd the irradiance EG from (5.189) and (5.194), once the mean beam length sm has been calculated for the problem.

5.6.3

Results for the emissivity

H.C. Hottel and R.B. Egbert [5.57], [5.58] have critically compared the results available for CO2 and H2 O from radiation measurements, and oﬀered best values of the total emissivity in graphs, in which εCO2 and εH2O are plotted against the gas temperature T with the product (pCO2 sm ) or (pH2 O sm ) as curve parameters. These diagrams have formed the basis of the calculations for gas radiation from CO2 and H2 O for the last 70 years. Uncertainties of at least 5 % have to be reckoned with in their application. Information concerning correction factors, based on more recent data can be found in [5.37], p. 636. The emissivities εCO2 and εH2 O are valid for the calculation of the radiation of a gas hemisphere of radius R = sm on a surface element in the centre of the sphere, cf. Fig. 5.73. How these results can be transferred to other shapes of gas space by using the mean beam length, sm , is explained in the next section. The hemispherical total emissivity εCO2 (T, pCO2 sm ) of CO2 at p = 100 kPa is illustrated in Fig. 5.74. εCO2 increases slightly with rising pressure. D. Vortmeyer [5.59] presents a particularly complex pressure correction factor, which can be neglected for pressures below around 200 kPa. As H2 O does not follow Beer’s law, εH2 O has to be determined from εH2 O (T, p, pH2O , sm ) = CH2O (p + pH2 O , pH2 O sm ) ε∗H2 O (T, pH2O sm )

(5.195)

644

5 Thermal radiation

Fig. 5.74: Hemispherical total emissivity εCO2 of carbon dioxide at p = 1 bar as a function of temperature T with the product of the partial pressure pCO2 and the mean beam length sm as a parameter. 1 bar = 100 kPa = 0.1 MPa

with the help of a second graph. Fig. 5.75 shows the emissivity ε∗H2 O for p = 100 kPa, extrapolated to pH2 O → 0. The partial pressure correction CH2 O is taken from Fig. 5.76. For pressures p greater than 100 kPa, ε∗H2 O should be multiplied by the pressure correction, an equation for this is given in [5.59]. If, as in combustion gases, CO2 and H2 O appear at the same time, then the emissivity of this sort of mixture is slightly less than the sum εCO2 + εH2 O , calculated at the respective partial pressures. This can be traced back to the fact that some of the absorption and emission bands of CO2 and H2 O overlap. H.C. Hottel and R.B. Egbert [5.58] determined the correction factor Δε that has to be introduced into εG = εCO2 + εH2 O − Δε

(5.196)

and plotted it in graphs. These can also be found in [5.59]. Equations for the dependency of the emissivities εCO2 and εH2 O on T , p and (pG sm ) are required for model design and process simulations. Various authors have developed these equations, cf. [5.60] to [5.63] as well as [5.37], p. 639–641. Although they contain numerous terms, they can only reproduce nearly accurate results for limited ranges of the variables, and this is why they cannot be recommended without limitations.

5.6 Gas radiation

645

Fig. 5.75: Total emissivity ε∗H2 O for water vapour at p = 1 bar, extrapolated to pH2 O → 0, as a function of temperature T , with the product of the partial pressure pH2 O and the mean beam length sm as parameter. 1 bar = 100 kPa = 0.1 MPa

Fig. 5.76: Partial pressure correction factor CH2 O for water vapour for use in (5.195)

The emissivities of other gases, namely SO2 , NH3 and CH4 , are presented graphically in [5.59]. Similar diagrams for CO, HCl and NO2 can be found in [5.48].

646

5.6.4

5 Thermal radiation

Emissivities and mean beam lengths of gas spaces

The emission of gas radiation depends on the size and shape of the gas space; it is described quantitatively by the irradiance, which the gas radiation generates at the surface of the gas space. The decisive equations (5.188) and (5.189) include V the spectral emissivity εV λ,G and the emissivity integrated over all wavelengths εG , which, according to (5.193) and (5.194), can be replaced by the emissivity of a gas hemisphere with a radius the same as the mean beam length sm of any shaped gas space. In order to explain the determination of the mean beam length, we ﬁrst have to look at the calculation of the spectral emissivity εV λ,G of a gas volume. We will then show how sm is determined and put together in Table 5.11 values of sm that have been calculated for diﬀerent geometries. In addition a simple approximation formula will be derived with which sm can be determined for gas spaces that are not covered in this collection. The spectral emissivity εV λ,G from (5.187) covers the radiation coming from the entire gas space, which is incident on a surface element dA = dA2 in Fig. 5.77. The solid angle element dω1 which appears in 1 = ε (kG s) cos β2 dω1 , (5.197) εV λ,G π λ,G and to which the beam length s belongs, is bounded by the surface element dA1 , such that dω1 = cos β1 dA1 /s2 holds. With that we obtain the following from (5.197) dA1 1 εV ελ,G (kG s) cos β1 cos β2 2 . λ,G = π s

(5.198)

A1

The integration over all solid angles is replaced by the integration over all the surface elements dA1 visible from dA2 . In general, in (5.198) the integration is carried out over the entire surface area A1 of the gas space. We will show how the integration is carried out for the example of a gas sphere of diameter D = 2R, that radiates on an element dA2 of its surface. According to Fig. 5.78, β1 = β2 = β has to be put into (5.198). We choose an annular surface element s dβ sin β = 2πs2 dβ . dA1 = 2πs sin β cos β cos β

Fig. 5.77: Gas space with surface element dA2 , which receives radiation from the solid angle element dω1 which is bounded by the surface element dA1

5.6 Gas radiation

647

Fig. 5.78: Gas sphere of radius R = D/2 and the surface elements dA1 and dA2 According to Fig. 5.78, we have cos β = s/2R = s/D, from which sin β dβ = − ds/D follows. With that dA1 = −2πs ds. With ελ,G (kG s) from (5.184), we obtain out of (5.198) εV λ,G =

2 D2

D [1 − exp (−kG s)] s ds . 0

Carrying out the integration gives εV λ,G (kG D) = 1 −

2 (kG D)

2

[1 − (1 + kG D) exp (−kG D)] .

(5.199)

The spectral emissivity of the gas sphere depends on its optical thickness κG = kG D. The characteristic length L0 of the gas space introduced in (5.187), is, as could be expected, the diameter D of the sphere. The symmetry of the sphere means that εV λ,G is independent of the position of the irradiated surface element dA2 . The spectral irradiance Eλ,G from (5.188) is constant over the entire surface of the sphere. So, with εV λ,G (kG D) the mean irradiance E λ,G of an arbitrary sized piece A2 of the sphere surface can be calculated. In general, the mean spectral irradiance E λ,G of a ﬁnitely large surface is obtained by integration of Eλ,G over all surface elements dA2 that make up A2 . A corresponding emissivity εV λ,G is yielded from the additional integration of (5.198) over all surface elements dA2 followed by division by A2 . The mean beam length sm of a gas space of any shape that radiates on an element dA = dA2 of its surface, is deﬁned by the fact that the spectral irradiance Eλ,G of dA2 has exactly the same magnitude as the spectral irradiance of a surface element in the centre of a gas hemisphere of radius R = sm . According to section 5.6.2, the spectral irradiance of this surface element is Eλ,G = ελ,G (kG sm )Mλs (λ, T ) = [1 − exp (−kG sm )] Mλs (λ, T ) .

(5.200)

By setting this expression equal to Eλ,G from (5.188), the relationship (5.193) from section 5.6.2 is obtained, from which 1 sm (kG L0 ) =− ln 1 − εV . λ,G (kG L0 ) L0 kG L0

(5.201)

follows. According to this, the mean beam length of a particular gas space is not constant, but depends on its optical thickness kG L0 . For a gas sphere sm /D = f (kG D) can be calculated exactly from (5.199). The dependence of the mean beam length sm on the optical thickness of the gas space makes the use of this quantity more diﬃcult. Therefore, a constant mean beam length is used. It is determined in such a way that (5.193) is satisﬁed in the best approximation for all technically

648

5 Thermal radiation

important optical thicknesses. For constant mean beam length sm , the integration carried out in (5.190) over all wavelengths can be replaced by the integration from (5.192) with R = sm , so that (5.192) is approximately satisﬁed and the irradiance EG from (5.190) with εG , instead of εV G , can be calculated. In the determination of a constant mean beam length sm we ﬁrst will consider the limiting case of an optically thin gas with κG = kG L0 → 0. The spectral radiation ﬂow emitted from a volume element of the gas in all directions is, according to (5.181), d2 Φλ,V = 4kG Mλs (λ, T ) dV dλ . It is not weakened as it passes through the optically thin gas. Therefore, the radiation ﬂow emitted from the entire gas volume is dΦλ = 4kG V Mλs (λ, T ) dλ . This generates, over the entire surface A of the gas volume, the mean spectral irradiance E λ,G =

V 1 dΦλ = 4kG Mλs (λ, T ) . A dλ A

An optically thin gas hemisphere of radius R = sm causes, according to (5.200), the spectral irradiance lim

kG sm →0

Eλ (kG sm ) =

lim

kG sm →0

[1 − exp (1 − kG sm )] Mλs (λ, T ) = (kG sm + · · · ) Mλs (λ, T )

on the surface element in the centre of the sphere. Setting this irradiance equal to E λ,G delivers the simple result k G L0 → 0 , (5.202) s∗m = 4V /A , where s∗m indicates the limit of sm for an optically thin gas. Values of s∗m can be found easily for diﬀerent gas spaces. For example a sphere has s∗m = 4

πD3 /6 2 = D πD2 3

and for the gas layer between inﬁnitely large, ﬂat plates with separation d we get s∗m = 4

d = 2d . 2

In the case of ﬁnite optical thickness s∗m is corrected by a constant factor C, so that sm = C s∗m = C 4V /A

(5.203)

holds. The correction factor C is determined in such a way that the spectral emissivity ελ,G (kG sm ) of the gas sphere agrees with εV λ,G (kG L0 ) within a few percent for a wide range of optical thicknesses, and equation (5.193) is satisﬁed in the average. This is shown by Fig. ∗ 5.79 for the example of a gas sphere of diameter D. The ratio εV λ,G (kG D)/ελ,G (kG Csm ) is plotted versus the optical thickness kG D. For C = 1 only negative deviations from the ideal value occur. Correction factors C < 1 lead to smaller deviations and an optimal ﬁt is obtained with C = 0.96, that is for sm = 0.64 D in place of s∗m = (2/3)D. As can be seen from Fig. 5.79, the choice of the correction factor C is arbitrary within certain limits. It also depends on the range of optical thickness in which a particularly good agreement between εV λ,G (kG L0 ) and ελ,G (kG sm ) is to be reached. This is why the values of sm for some cases in the literature may diﬀer slightly from one another.

5.6 Gas radiation

649

Fig. 5.79: Ratio of the spectral emissivity εV λ,G (kG D) from (5.199) for a gas sphere with diameter D to the spectral emissivity ελ,G (kG Cs∗m ) from (5.200), with s∗m = (2/3)D as a function of the optical thickness kG D

εV λ,G has been calculated exactly for a series of gas spaces and the associated mean beam lengths sm have also been determined. These values of sm are put together in Table 5.11. This shows that the correction factors C, in (5.203), only a little deviate from 0.9. It can therefore be said that for those gas space geometries not included in Table 5.11 sm ≈ 0.9 s∗m = 3.6 V /A .

(5.204)

With this mean beam length, the mean irradiance E G of the total surface A of the radiating gas space of volume V is found to be E G = εG (T, p, pG, sm ) σT 4 .

(5.205)

The emissivities εG for CO2 and H2 O can be taken from Fig. 5.74 to 5.76 in section 5.6.3. Example 5.14: A hemisphere of radius R = 0.50 m contains CO2 at p = 1 bar and T = 1200 K. Determine the mean irradiance E CO2 of its surface and compare this value with the irradiance ECO2 of a surface element at the centre of the sphere. We obtain E CO2 from (5.205), whereby εCO2 is taken from Fig. 5.74. As no value is given for sm for a hemisphere in Table 5.11, sm is calculated approximately from (5.204). With V = (2π/3)R3 and A = 2πR2 + πR2 = 3πR2 , this gives s∗m = (8/9)R and sm = 0.80R = 0.40 m. With that we have pCO2 sm = psm = 0.40 bar·m. εCO2 = 0.16 is read oﬀ Fig. 5.74. This yields, according to (5.205), the approximate value E CO2 = 0.16 · 5.67 · 10−8

W kW 12004 K4 = 18.8 2 . m 2 K4 m

For the radiation of the gas hemisphere on a surface element at its centre, we have exactly sm = R = 0.50 m. Then from Fig. 5.74, the somewhat larger emissivity εCO2 = 0.18 and the correspondingly larger irradiance ECO2 = 21.2 kW/m2 are obtained. This result with ECO2 > E CO2 is expected because the irradiance is not constant over the surface of the hemisphere.

650

5 Thermal radiation

Table 5.11: Mean beam lengths s∗m for vanishingly small optical thicknesses and sm for ﬁnite optical thickness. Further information in [5.37], [5.48] and [5.59] Gas space Sphere Inﬁnitely long cylinder Cylinder, Length L = D, Radiation on the whole surface Radiation on the centre of the base Cylinder, Length L = D/2 Radiation on the whole surface Radiation on the body Radiation on an end Cylinder, Length L = 2D Radiation on the whole surface Radiation on the body Radiation on both ends Cylinder, Length L → ∞ Radiation on the base Cube Cuboid, Side lengths 1:1:4 Radiation on the total area Radiation on 1×4 area Radiation on 1×1 area Flat layer between two inﬁnitely extended parallel walls

5.6.5

Characteristic length L0

s∗m L0

sm L0

sm s∗m

Diameter Diameter Diameter

2/3 1

0.64 0.94

0.96 0.94

2/3

0.60

0.90

0.764

0.71

0.93

1/2 0.525 0.475

0.45 0.46 0.43

0.90 0.88 0.91

4/5 0.817 0.730

0.73 0.76 0.60

0.91 0.93 0.82

0.814 2/3

0.65 0.60

0.80 0.90

0.89 0.90 0.86 2

0.81 0.82 0.71 1.76

0.91 0.91 0.83 0.88

Diameter

Diameter

Diameter Side length shortest side

Distance

Radiative exchange in a gas ﬁlled enclosure

The radiative exchange in a gas ﬁlled enclosure is more diﬃcult to calculate than the exchange dealt with in 5.5.3, without an absorbing and therefore self radiating gas. In the following we will consider two simple cases, in which an isothermal gas is involved in radiative interchange with its boundary walls that are likewise at a uniform temperature. At the end of this section we will point to more complex methods with which more diﬃcult radiative exchange problems may be solved. 5.6.5.1

Black, isothermal boundary walls

An isothermal gas at temperature TG is enclosed by isothermal walls at a temperature TW < TG . As a simpliﬁcation the walls will be idealised as black bodies; reﬂection does not need to be considered. A heat ﬂow Q˙ GW from the gas to the colder walls is transferred by radiative exchange. If the gas is to maintain its

5.6 Gas radiation

651

temperature TG , then this energy has to be supplied to the gas in another way, for example from a combustion process taking place in the gas space. The radiation ﬂow emitted by the gas generates a mean irradiance EG = εG (TG , p, pG , sm )σTG4 at the walls, cf. (5.205). The black walls with an area AW absorb the radiation ﬂow AW EG completely. The radiation ﬂow emitted by them 4 AW Ms (TW ) = AW σTW

is partially absorbed as it travels through the gas. The portion that is not absorbed strikes the walls once again and is absorbed there. As the walls have the same temperature TW overall, this part of the radiation ﬂow does not contribute to the heat ﬂow Q˙ GW . This gives 4 . (5.206) Q˙ GW = AW [EG (TG ) − aG Ms (TW )] = AW σ εG TG4 − aG TW Here, aG is the absorptivity of the gas for the radiation emitted by a black body at temperature TW . As the gas is not a grey radiator, aG is not the same as εG , except for the limiting case where TW = TG . H.C. Hottel and R.B. Egbert [5.58], see also [5.48], determined aG for CO2 and H2 O from absorption measurements, and related them to the emissivity from 5.6.3, as shown in the following equations: 0.65 TG TW (5.207) εCO2 TW , pCO2 sm , aCO2 = TW TG 0.45 p H2 O + p TG TW TW ∗ aH2 O = ε H2 O T W , p H2 O sm · CH2 O sm . , p H2 O TW TG 2 TG (5.208) The emissivities are taken from Fig. 5.74 to 5.76, for a wall temperature TW and the product (pG sm ) reduced by a factor of (TW /TG ). For pressures p above 1 bar, the pressure corrections mentioned in section 5.6.3 have to be brought into play at εCO2 and ε∗H2 O . 5.6.5.2

Grey isothermal boundary walls

If the gas ﬁlled enclosure is surrounded by grey walls with emissivity εW = εW (TW ), then the energy reﬂected by the walls also has to be considered. Rough, oxidised and dirty walls have emissivities that are only slightly smaller than one. In this case, which often applies in furnaces, the reﬂected radiation proportion is of little importance. The heat ﬂow Q˙ GW transferred from the gas to the walls is smaller, by a factor that lies between εW and 1, than the heat ﬂow calculated according to (5.206) for black walls. At suﬃciently large values of εW , around εW > 0.8, the approximation recommended by H.C. Hottel and A.F. Saroﬁm [5.48] of εW + 1 4 Q˙ GW = (5.209) AW σ εG TG4 − aG TW 2

652

5 Thermal radiation

is accurate enough. In the consideration of the radiation reﬂected by the walls, the exchange of radiation can be calculated just like in section 5.5.3. According to (5.143), the heat released by the walls to the outside Q˙ GW = AW (EW − HW )

(5.210)

is equal to the net ﬂow of radiation. Here, this is the diﬀerence between the mean irradiance EW and the mean radiosity HW of the area AW . The irradiance EW is made up of the fraction generated by the gas radiation, EG = εG σTG4 , and the fraction emitted by the walls that is not absorbed by the gas, (1 − aG )HW : EW = εG σTG4 + (1 − aG ) HW .

(5.211)

The radiosity HW includes, according to (5.142), the emissive power MW = 4 εW σTW of the wall area and the reﬂected fraction of the irradiance EW : 4 HW = εW σTW + (1 − εW ) EW .

(5.212)

Solving the two equations, (5.211) and (5.212), for EW and HW , and by putting the result into (5.210), gives Q˙ GW =

εW AW σ 4 εG TG4 − aG TW . 1 − (1 − aG ) (1 − εW )

(5.213)

This equation is also not exact, because of the restrictive assumptions that were made. Only symmetrically formed gas spaces (spheres, very long cylinders) have approximately constant values of EW and HW on their entire boundary walls, which is one of the presumptions made here. The radiation not absorbed by the gas, given by the term (1 − aG )HW in (5.211), does not take into account in HW that the radiation passing through the gas consists of radiation made up of fractions with diﬀerent spectral distributions: This includes the grey radiation emitted by the walls and the radiation reﬂected by the walls after one, two or even multiple passes through the absorbing gas. The application of a uniform absorptivity aG is therefore incorrect. As long as the reﬂected fractions are small (large εW ), the use of the absorptivity calculated according to (5.207) and (5.208) is a good enough approximation. It is certainly better than the assumption of a grey gas, where aG = εG would be valid. A more exact calculation of the radiative exchange, in which the absorption of the reﬂected radiation in the gas space has been extensively modelled, has been presented by K. Elgeti [5.64]. Another method for the consideration of the spectral absorption bands can be found in [5.37], section 17-7. Example 5.15: A cylindrical combustion chamber with diameter D = 0.40 m and length L = 0.95 m contains a combustion gas at temperature TG = 2000 K and pressure p = 1.1 bar. The partial pressures of CO2 and H2 O are pCO2 = 0.10 bar and pH2 O = 0.20 bar respectively. The walls of the chamber are at TW = 900 K and their emissivity is εW = 0.75. Determine the heat ﬂow transferred from the gas to the chamber casing. The relationships derived in this section for the radiative exchange only allow the calculation of the mean heat ﬂux of the entire surface of the gas space. It follows from (5.213) as Q˙ GW εW σ q˙GW = = εG TG4 − aG TG4 . (5.214) AW 1 − (1 − aG )(1 − εW )

5.6 Gas radiation

653

This provides us with an approximate value for the heat ﬂow transferred from the gas to the chamber casing Q˙ GW = q˙GW AM = πDL q˙GW . (5.215) The mean beam length has to be determined for the calculation of εG and aG . Its limit for an optically thin gas is s∗m = 4

V D = 0.330 m . = AW 1 + D/2L

According to Table 5.11, the ratio C = sm /s∗m for a cylinder with L/D = 2 has a value of 0.91. This value applies with good accuracy for a combustion chamber with L/D = 2.375. We therefore have sm = 0.91 · 0.330 m = 0.30 m. For pCO2 sm = 0.030 bar m, we read oﬀ from Fig. 5.74, an emissivity εCO2 = 0.0362. Then from Figs. 5.75 and 5.76, we obtain for pH2 O sm = 0.060 bar m, εH2 O = ε∗H2 O CH2 O = 0.0360 · 1.20 = 0.0432 . As the gas pressure p = 1.1 bar is only slightly greater than 1 bar, a pressure correction of εCO2 and εH2 O is not necessary. In order to obtain εG from (5.196), the correction Δε is required. This is found, using the graph reproduced in [5.59], to be Δε = 0.0025, which gives εG = 0.0769. The determination of the absorptivity aG requires the emissivity at the reduced partial pressures, i.e. at pCO2

TW sm = 0.0135 bar m TG

and

p H2 O

TW sm = 0.027 bar m . TG

For T = TW = 900 K, Fig. 5.74 gives εCO2 = 0.060, which, with (5.207) gives aCO2 = 0.101. For H2 O, we ﬁnd ε∗H2 O = 0.226 and CH2 O = 1.20, so aH2 O = 0.388 is yielded from (5.208). With Δε = 0.003 from [5.59] we get aG = aCO2 + aH2 O − Δε = 0.486 . The gas mixture absorbs the radiation coming from the walls far more strongly than it emits itself radiation in comparison to “black” gas radiation. The mean heat ﬂux transferred by radiation to the walls of the combustion chamber is found, with the values of εG and aG , from (5.214), to be q˙GW =

0.75 · 5.67 · 10−8 W/(m2 K4 ) kW 0.0769 (2000 K)4 − 0.468 (900 K)4 = 45.1 2 . 1 − (1 − 0.486)(1 − 0.75) m

The heat ﬂow we want to determine follows from (5.215) as Q˙ GM = π(0.40 m)(0.95 m)45.1(kW/m2 ) = 53.8 kW . According to (1.64) in section 1.1.6, the heat ﬂux q˙GW , corresponds to a heat transfer coeﬃcient of radiation of αrad =

q˙GW W = 41.0 2 . TG − TW m K

It lies in the same order of magnitude as the heat transfer coeﬃcient expected here for convection. The gas radiation may not be neglected in heat transfer calculations for combustion chambers and furnaces.

654

5.6.5.3

5 Thermal radiation

Calculation of the radiative exchange in complicated cases

If the gas ﬁlled enclosure is surrounded by non-isothermal walls, then these should be split into several isothermal areas, the so-called zones. The radiative exchange between several zones can then be calculated as in section 5.5.3. However, the absorption of the radiation as it passes through the gas must also be taken into account along with the radiation exchange between the gas and the zones. This calculation requires the view factors introduced in section 5.5.1, as well as the transmissivities of the gas volumes participating in radiative interchange between the zones. As in section 5.5.3.1, a system of equations is obtained, from which the radiosities of the zones, their temperatures and the heat ﬂows supplied from or released to the outside can be calculated. R. Siegel and J.R. Howell [5.37], Chap. 13, show how this equation system should be set up and how the transmissivities of the gas volumes which the radiation passes through are calculated. A somewhat diﬀerent formulation of the radiative exchange equations can be found in H.C. Hottel and A.F. Saroﬁm [5.48]. A further problem in the calculation of radiative exchange is the consideration of the fact that gases only absorb and emit within certain wavelength intervals or bands. Here, sometimes the highly simpliﬁed assumption will be made that the gas behaves like a grey radiator. A better model of real radiation behaviour is band approximation. This is extensively discussed in [5.37], p. 549–567 and 607–609. In the more realistic calculations of radiative exchange in furnaces and combustion chambers, a non-isothermal gas space has to be considered. H.C. Hottel and A.F. Saroﬁm [5.48] developed the so-called zone method for this case, cf. also [5.37], p. 647–652. Other procedures for the consideration of the temperature ﬁelds in the gas space have been extensively dealt with by R. Siegel and J.R. Howell [5.37], Chapter 15. The application of the Monte-Carlo method is suggested in particular, cf. [5.37] and [5.66], which despite being mathematically complex, produces results without making highly simpliﬁed assumptions. In technical furnaces the radiation from soot, coal and ash particles has to be considered as well as the gas radiation. Then the scattering of radiation by the suspended particles becomes important, alongside absorption and emission. P. Biermann and D. Vortmeyer [5.67], as well as H.-G. Brummel and E. Kakaras [5.68] have developed models for this. A summary can be found in [5.69] and in [5.37], p. 652–673. The calculations of heat transport in furnaces has been dealt with by W. Richter and K. G¨orner [5.70] as well as H.C. Hottel and A.F. Saroﬁm [5.48].

5.7 Exercises

5.7

655

Exercises

5.1: Radiation with the vacuum wavelength λ = 3.0 μm goes through glass (refractive index n = 1.52). What are the propagation velocity c and the wavelength λM in the glass? Calculate the energy of a photon in a vacuum and in glass. 5.2: A Lambert radiator emits radiation at a certain temperature only in the wavelength interval (λ1 , λ2 ), where its spectral intensity Lλ (λ) = Lλ (λm ) − a (λ − λm )2 with Lλ (λm ) = 72 W/(m2 μm sr), a = 50 W/(m2 μm2 sr) and λm = 3.5 μm, has positive values. For λ ≤ λ1 and λ ≥ λ2 we have Lλ = 0. Find λ1 and λ2 . Calculate the intensity L and the emissive power M . What fraction of the emissive power falls into the solid angle bounded by (π/3) ≤ β ≤ (π/2) and 0 ≤ ϕ ≤ (π/4)? 5.3: What proportion ΔM of the emissive power M of a Lambert radiator falls in the portion of the hemisphere for which the polar angle is β ≤ 30◦ ? 5.4: An opaque body, with the hemispherical total reﬂectivity r = 0.15, reﬂects diﬀusely. Determine the intensity Lref of the reﬂected radiation and the absorbed radiative power per area for an irradiance E = 800 W/m2 . 5.5: An enclosure is kept at a constant temperature. Radiation enters from outside through a small, circular opening of diameter d = 5.60 mm; the radiation ﬂow is Φ = 2.35 W. What is the temperature of the enclosure walls? 5.6: A radiator emits its maximum hemispherical spectral emissive power at λmax = 2.07 μm. Estimate its temperature T and its emissive power M (T ), under the assumption that it radiates like a black body. 5.7: What temperature does a black body need to be at, so that a third of its emissive power lies in the visible light region (0.38 μm ≤ λ ≤ 0.78 μm)? 5.8: A diﬀuse radiating oven wall has a temperature T = 500 K and a spectral emissivity approximated by the following function: ⎧ ⎨ 0.12 , 0 < λ ≤ 1.6 μm , ελ = 0.48 , 1.6 μm < λ ≤ 8 μm , ⎩ 0.86 , λ > 8 μm . The oven wall is exposed to radiation from glowing coal; the spectral irradiance Eλ can be assumed to be proportional to the hemispherical spectral emissive power Mλs (TK ) of a black body at TK = 2000 K. a) Calculate the total emissivity ε of the oven wall. b) Calculate the total absorptivity a of the oven wall for the radiation emitted by the coal.

656

5 Thermal radiation

5.9: A very long cylinder is struck by radiation that comes from a single direction, perpendicular to its axis (parallel directed radiation). The surface of the cylinder behaves like a grey radiator with the directional total emissivity ε (β) = 0.85 cos β. Calculate the reﬂected fraction of the incident radiative power. 5.10: A plate which allows radiation to pass through with a hemispherical total absorptivity a = 0.36, is irradiated equally from both sides, whilst air with ϑL = 30 ◦ C ﬂows over both surfaces. They assume a temperature ϑW = 75 ◦ C at steady-state. The heat transfer coeﬃcient between the plate and the air is α = 35 W/m2 K. Using a radiation detector it is ascertained that the plate releases a heat ﬂux q˙Str = 4800 W/m2 from both sides. Calculate the irradiance E and the hemispherical total emissivity ε of the plate. 5.11: A smooth, polished platinum surface emits radiation with an emissive power of M = 1.64 kW/m2 . Using the simpliﬁed electromagnetic theory determine its temperature T , the hemispherical total emissivity ε and the total emissivity εn in the direction of the surface normal. The speciﬁc electrical resistance of platinum may be calculated according to re = (0.384 6 (T/K) − 6.94) 10−7 Ωcm . 5.12: A long channel has a hemispherical cross section (circle diameter d = 0.40 m). Determine the view factors F11 , F12 , F21 and F22 , where index 1 indicates the ﬂat surface and index 2 the curved surface. 5.13: A sphere 1 lies on an inﬁnitely large plane 2. How large is the view factor F12 ? 5.14: An enclosure is formed from three ﬂat surfaces of ﬁnite width and inﬁnite length. The three widths are b1 = 1.0 m, b2 = 2.5 m and b3 = 1.8 m. Calculate the nine view factors Fij (i, j = 1, 2, 3). 5.15: A very long, cylindrical heating element of diameter d = 25 mm is h = 50 mm away from a reﬂective (adiabatic) wall, Fig. 5.80.

Fig. 5.80: Cylindrical heating element above a reﬂective wall The heating element has a temperature T = 700 K, the surroundings are at TS = 300 K. The heating element, wall and surroundings are all assumed to be black bodies. Only the heat transfer by radiation is to be considered. Determine the temperature of the wall surface as a function of the coordinate x and calculate T (x) for x = 0, x = h, x = 2h, x = 10h and x → ∞. Note: The view factor between a surface strip dA1 of inﬁnitesimal

5.7 Exercises

657

width and any length (perpendicular to the drawing plane in Fig. 5.81) and a ruled or cylindrical surface 2 is given by F12 =

1 (sin β2 − sin β1 ) . 2

Here, the ruled surface 2 is produced by parallel straight lines of inﬁnite length, perpendicular to the drawing plane in Fig. 5.81. The derivation of this equation is available in [5.37], p. 197–199.

Fig. 5.81: Surface strip dA1 of inﬁnitesimal width and a ruled surface 2 generated by parallel, inﬁnitely long straight lines perpendicular to the drawing plane

5.16: A long, cylindrical nickel rod (d1 = 10 mm) is heated electrically and releases a heat ﬂow per length L of Q˙ 1 /L = 210 W/m. The emissivity of nickel can be calculated from ε(T ) = 0.050 + 0.000 10 (T /K) . The rod is surrounded by a concentrically arranged hollow cylinder, d2 = 25 mm, ε2 = 0.88. The hollow cylinder is cooled from outside to a temperature of T2 = 290 K. What surface temperature does the nickel rod reach, if heat is only transferred by radiation? 5.17: A living room has a rectangular ﬂoor (width 3.5 m, depth 4.8 m) and a height of 2.8 m. Underﬂoor heating keeps the base area 1 at a constant temperature ϑ1 = 29 ◦ C. One of the narrow side walls (3.5 m by 2.8 m) is the external wall and has been built into a window, the temperature of which is ϑ2 = 17 ◦ C. The ceiling and the other walls can be considered as (adiabatic) reradiating walls. All surfaces are grey Lambert radiators with ε = 0.92. Determine the heat ﬂow transferred by radiation from the ﬂoor to the external wall. 5.18: In order to reduce the radiative exchange between two large, parallel plates, a thin, ﬂat radiation protection shield is introduced between the plates. However, the emissivities of the two surfaces of the shield are diﬀerent; one surface has emissivity εS < 0.4, the other an emissivity of 2.5 εS . a) The protection shield is to be orientated so that the heat ﬂow transferred is as small as possible. Should the side with the emissivity εS be directed to the plate at the temperature T1 > T2 , or is the opposite arrangement better? b) Which of the two orientations leads to the higher temperature TS of the protection shield?

658

5 Thermal radiation

5.19: Two very thin, radiation protection shields, A and B, are positioned parallel to and between two very large, parallel plates at temperatures T1 = 750 K and T2 = 290 K. All surfaces are grey radiators with the same emissivity ε = 0.82. a) Calculate the temperatures TA and TB of the protection shields. b) Calculate the heat ﬂux q˙ transferred by radiation between the two plates. c) The two protection shields are removed, plate 1 is heated with the heat ﬂux q˙ from b), and plate 2 is kept at the temperature T2 = 290 K. What is the temperature T1 of plate 1? 5.20: The walls of older houses were often constructed as two shells, see Fig. 5.82. A column of air exists between two brick walls (λ = 0.95 W/K m, ε = 0.88) of thicknesses δ1 = 0.24 m and δ2 = 0.115 m. This column is δ = 0.060 m wide. The heat transfer coeﬃcients have the values αi = 7.5 W/m2 K and αa = 18.0 W/m2 K. The temperatures are ϑi = 22.0 ◦ C and ϑa = −5.0 ◦ C. The thermal conductivity of air is λair = 0.024 5 W/K m.

Fig. 5.82: Double shell brick walls with air gap of width δ

a) An eﬀective thermal conductivity λeﬀ of the air gap that also takes into account the eﬀect of radiation is introduced. The free convection in the air gap can be neglected. Calculate λeﬀ and the heat ﬂux q˙ transferred by the wall. b) The air gap is ﬁlled with insulating foam (λis = 0.040 W/K m). How does this change q? ˙ 5.21: CO2 at p = 1 bar ﬂows through a long, cooled pipe with internal diameter d = 0.10 m. Its velocity is w = 20 m/s, and its mean temperature is ϑG = 1000 ◦ C. The pipe wall temperature is ϑW = 500 ◦ C, the emissivity of the pipe wall is εW = 0.86. In order to determine the contribution of the gas radiation to heat transfer, calculate the heat transfer coeﬃcients α for convection and αrad for radiation. — Property data for CO2 at 1000 ◦ C: λ = 0.0855 W/K m, ν = 117 · 10−6 m2 /s, P r = 0.736.

Appendix A: Supplements

A.1

Introduction to tensor notation

In the derivation of balance equations the tensor notation is used because it allows the equations to be written in a clearer and simpler fashion. We have restricted ourselves in this to cartesian coordinates. In the following, the essential features of cartesian tensor notation are only illustrated to an extent required for the derivation of the balance equations; extensive publications are available for further reading. We will start with an example. The velocity w of a point of mass is known as a vector which can be set in a cartesian coordinate system using its components wx , wy , wz : w(wx , wy , wz ) . If the unit vector in a cartesian coordinate system is indicated by ex , ey , ez , it holds that w = wx ex + wy ey + wz ez . In tensor notation, the indices x, y, z are replaced by the indices 1, 2, 3 and we write instead 3 w = w1 e1 + w2 e2 + w3 e3 = wi ei . i=1

The velocity vector w is characterised completely by its components wi , i = 1, 2, 3. In tensor notation, the velocity vector is indicated by the abbreviation wi with i = 1, 2, 3. Correspondingly, the position vector x(x, y, z) is determined by its components x1 = x, x2 = y, x3 = z, and in tensor notation by the abbreviated xi with i = 1, 2, 3. According to this, a vector is indicated by a single index. It is possible to diﬀerentiate between tensors of diﬀerent levels. Zero level tensors are scalars. They do not change by transferring to another coordinate system. Examples of scalars are temperature ϑ, pressure p and density . No index is necessary for their characterisation. First level tensors are vectors. As explained above, they are indicated by one index. Second level tensors are characterised by two indices. The stress tensor is such a quantity. It has nine components τ11, τ12 , τ13 , τ21 . . . τ33. The abbreviation normally written is τji , where j and i each assume the values 1, 2, 3. In calculations with tensors, the following rule is used. If an index only appears

Appendix A: Supplements

661

once in a term of an equation it is called a free index. It can be replaced by any other index. All terms in an equation must agree in their free indices. The relationship (A.1) ai = c · bi , whereby c is a constant (scalar), means that the vectors ai and bi only diﬀer in their amount, they have the same direction. So a1 = c b1 ;

a 2 = c b2 ;

a3 = c b3 .

The internal product (scalar product) of two vectors a · b = a1 b1 + a2 b2 + a3 b3 looks like the following for the index notation a·b=

3

ai bi .

i=1

As internal products appear frequently the following “summation convention” was settled: if an index appears twice in a term, then it should be summed over this index. This index is called a bound index. It can not be replaced by any other index. The summation symbol is left out. With that we have ai bi = a1 b1 + a2 b2 + a3 b3 .

(A.2)

Diﬀerentiation leads to a tensor that is one order higher. So the gradient of a scalar p ∂p ∂p ∂p gradp = ∇ p = e1 + e2 + e3 (A.3) ∂x1 ∂x2 ∂x3 is a vector with the three components ∂p/∂xi , i = 1, 2, 3, which is abbreviated to just ∂p/∂xi in tensor notation. If we diﬀerentiate a vector wj , each of the three components w1 , w2 , w3 can be diﬀerentiated with respect to each position coordinate x1 , x2 , x3 . This gives a second level tensor ∂wj ∂xi

(i = 1, 2, 3 ; j = 1, 2, 3) ,

(A.4)

that consists of 9 components. On the other hand, the divergence of a vector is a scalar, ∂w1 ∂w2 ∂w3 ∂wi = + + . (A.5) divw = ∇ · w = ∂xi ∂x1 ∂x2 ∂x3 The formulation of a divergence produces a tensor one order lower than the original tensor. A sensible ‘operator’ is the Kronecker delta δij , deﬁned by δij = 1 for i = j ,

δij = 0 for i = j .

(A.6)

662

Appendix A: Supplements

δij is also called the unit tensor. It further holds that δij bj = bi ,

(A.7)

which can be conﬁrmed by writing the whole equation out, because it is δij bj = δi1 b1 + δi2 b2 + δi3 b3 that is, for i = 1 : δ1j bj = δ11 b1 = b1 , for i = 2 : δ2j bj = δ22 b2 = b2 and for i = 3 : δ3j bj = δ33 b3 = b3 , and with that δij bj = bi .

A.2

Relationship between mean and thermodynamic pressure

By deﬁnition, the mean pressure p¯ = −1/3 δji τkk only includes normal stresses. In order to create a link between mean and thermodynamic pressure we will consider a cubic ﬂuid element at a temperature T and of speciﬁc volume v, Fig. A1. We will now assume that the cube is at rest at time t = 0, so that the thermodynamic pressure p prevails inside the element. Now let us assume the mean pressure p¯ is being exerted on the element from outside. When p¯ > p the cube is compressed, should p¯ < p then it expands. So, work −¯ p dV is carried out by the external pressure p¯. This is equal to the work done during the volume change in the gas −p dV and the dissipated work. It therefore holds that dW = −¯ p dV = −p dV + dWdiss with the the dissipated work as dWdiss = −(¯ p − p) dV . This is always positive according to the second law, because for p¯ > p we have dV < 0 and for p¯ < p, dV > 0. On the other hand, the increase in the volume dV is yielded from the transport theory (3.18) with Z = V and z = Z/M = V /M = 1/ to be dV ∂wi = dV . dt ∂xi V (t)

The dissipated work can also be written as ⎛ ⎞ ∂wi ⎜ ⎟ p − p) ⎝ dV ⎠ dt . dWdiss = −(¯ ∂xi V (t)

It is clearly reasonable that the speed dV /dt of the volume change or ∂wi /∂xi is a monotonically decaying function of p¯ − p, Fig. A2, as the larger the overpressure p¯ − p, the faster the volume of the cube reduces. It is therefore suggested, that

Appendix A: Supplements

Fig. A.1: Interrelation between mean and thermodynamic pressure

663

Fig. A.2: Expansion as a function of the over pressure

where the speed of the volume change is not that fast, the curve in Fig. A2 may be replaced by a straight line: p¯ − p = −ζ

∂wi . ∂xi

The factor deﬁned by this, ζ > 0, is the volume viscosity (SI units kg/s m). It has to be determined either experimentally or using methods of statistical thermodynamics, which is only possible for substances with simple molecules. It can be seen that the mean and thermodynamic pressures only strictly agree when ζ = 0 or the ﬂuid is incompressible, ∂wi /∂xi = 0.

A.3

Navier-Stokes equations for an incompressible ﬂuid of constant viscosity in cartesian coordinates

The mass force is the acceleration due to gravity kj = gj . x1 = x-direction:

∂w1 ∂w1 ∂w1 ∂w1 + w1 = + w2 + w3 ∂t ∂x1 ∂x2 ∂x3

∂ 2 w1 ∂ 2 w1 ∂ 2w1 ∂p +η + + g1 − . ∂x1 ∂x1 2 ∂x2 2 ∂x3 2

(A.8)

664

Appendix A: Supplements

x2 = y-direction:

∂w2 ∂w2 ∂w2 ∂w2 + w1 = + w2 + w3 ∂t ∂x1 ∂x2 ∂x3

∂p ∂ 2 w2 ∂ 2 w2 ∂ 2w3 . +η + + g2 − ∂x2 ∂x1 2 ∂x2 2 ∂x3 2

(A.9)

x3 = z-direction:

∂w3 ∂w3 ∂w3 ∂w3 + w1 = + w2 + w3 ∂t ∂x1 ∂x2 ∂x3

∂p ∂ 2 w3 ∂ 2w3 ∂ 2w3 +η + + g3 − . ∂x3 ∂x1 2 ∂x2 2 ∂x3 2

A.4

(A.10)

Navier-Stokes equations for an incompressible ﬂuid of constant viscosity in cylindrical coordinates

The mass force is the acceleration due to gravity kj = gj . r-direction:

∂wr ∂wr wθ ∂wr wθ2 ∂wr = + wr + − + wz ∂t ∂r r ∂θ r ∂z 1 ∂ 2w ∂p 2 ∂wθ ∂ 2wr ∂ 1 ∂ r . − 2 gr − +η (r wr ) + 2 + ∂r ∂r r ∂r r ∂θ2 r ∂θ ∂z 2 θ-direction:

∂wθ ∂wθ wθ + wr + ∂t ∂r r ∂ 1 1 ∂p gθ − +η r ∂θ ∂r r z-direction:

∂wθ wr wθ ∂wθ + + wz ∂θ r ∂z

(A.11)

=

1 ∂ 2w ∂ 2 ∂wr ∂ 2 wθ θ (r wθ ) + 2 + + 2 2 ∂r r ∂θ r ∂θ ∂z 2

∂wz ∂wz wθ ∂wz ∂wz = + wr + + wz ∂t ∂r r ∂θ ∂z ∂p 1 ∂ ∂wz 1 ∂ 2 wz ∂ 2wz gz − . + r + 2 +η ∂z r ∂r ∂r r ∂θ2 ∂z 2

(A.12) .

(A.13)

Appendix A: Supplements

A.5

665

Entropy balance for mixtures

The Gibbs’ fundamental equation for mixtures, μK dξ du = T ds − p dv + ˜K K M K or

μK dξK ds dv du = T −p + , ˜ K dt dt dt dt M K

(A.14)

taking into account dv 1 d 1 ∂wi =− 2 = dt dt ∂xi and (3.25)

∗ ∂jK,i dξK =− + Γ˙ K dt ∂xi

(A.15)

can be rearranged into

∗ μK ds ∂wi μK ∂jK,i du − + Γ˙ . = T −p ˜ K ∂xi ˜K K dt dt ∂xi M M K K

˜ K = hK − T sK this delivers Due to μK /M

∗ ∗ μK ∂jK,i ∂jK,i ds ∂wi du = T −p − hK +T sK + Γ˙ . ˜K K dt dt ∂xi ∂xi ∂xi M K

K

K

Putting this into the energy equation (3.81), taking into account the following, yields ∗ q˙ = q˙i + hK jK,i K

∗ μK ∂jK,i ∂ q˙i ds ∗ ∂hK ∗ Γ˙ . − +Φ+ jK,i kK,i = T jK,i +T sK + + ˜K K ∂xi dt ∂x ∂x M i i K K K K (A.16) We write the following for

T

sK

K

∗ ∗ ∂(jK,i ∂jK,i sK ) ∗ ∂sK =T −T jK,i ∂xi ∂xi ∂xi K K

and combine to give K

∗ jK,i

∂hK ∂sK −T ∂xi ∂xi

=

K

∗ jK,i

∂μK ∂xi

T

1 . ˜ MK

666

Appendix A: Supplements

Then (A.16) becomes −

∗ ∂(jK,i sK ) ds ∂ q˙i ∗ +Φ+ jK,i kK,i = T +T ∂xi dt ∂x i K K μK ∗ 1 ∂μK + K jK,i + Γ˙ . ˜ ˜K K ∂xi T MK M K

And so

∗ sK ) ds q˙i ∂T ∂(q˙i /T ) ∂(jK,i − − 2 = − dt ∂xi ∂xi T ∂xi K Φ ∂μK 1 1 1 μK ˙ ∗ + + + jK,i kK,i − Γ . ˜K ˜K K T K ∂xi T T T K M M

A comparison with

ds ∂ (JS,i − wi s) + σ˙ =− dt ∂xi yields the entropy ﬂow JS,i (SI units W/m2 K) q˙i ∗ JS,i = + jK,i sK + wi s T K

(A.17)

(A.18)

and the entropy generation σ˙ (SI units W/m3 K) q˙i ∂T 1 ∗ 1 Φ 1 μK ˙ ∂μK σ˙ = − 2 + jK,i kK,i − Γ . (A.19) + + ˜ ˜K K T ∂xi T K ∂xi T T T K M MK The entropy ﬂow is based on a heat or material ﬂow, the entropy generation on a heat ﬂow in a temperature ﬁeld, diﬀusion by mass forces and diﬀerences in the chemical potential, mechanical dissipation and chemical reactions.

A.6

Relationship between partial and speciﬁc enthalpy

When the following summation is written out with the abbreviation δ = ∂/∂xi it looks like N ∗ ∂hK ∗ ∗ ∗ jK,i = j1,i δh1 + j2,i δh2 + . . . jN,i δhN . ∂x i K=1 Now

N K=1

∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ jK,i = 0, also jN,i = −j1,i − j2,i − . . . − jN −1,i . The sum can also be

written as ∗ ∗ ∗ j1,i δ(h1 − hN ) + j2,i δ(h2 − hN ) + . . . jN −1,i δ(hN −1 − hN ) .

Appendix A: Supplements

667

In the thermodynamics of mixtures [3.1], p.131, it can be shown, that for speciﬁc partial quantities of state the following relationship is valid ∂h hA − h N = , A = 1, 2, . . . N − 1 . ∂ξA T,p,K=A It holds therefore that N

∗ jK,i

K=1

N −1 N −1 ∂hK ∂ ∂h ∂h ∗ ∗ = jK,i δ = j . ∂xi ∂ξK T,p,A=K K=1 K,i ∂xi ∂ξK T,p,A=K K=1

On the other hand, the enthalpy of a mixture is given by h = h(T, p, ξ1, ξ2 , . . . ξN −1 )

and therefore

∂h ∂ξN

=0 . T,p,ξK

So the sum can also run from K = 1 to K = N , instead of from K = 1 to K = N − 1, as the last term with K = N is zero.

A.7

Calculation of the constants an of the Graetz-Nusselt problem (3.245)

Multiplication of (3.244) with ψm (r+ ) (1 − r+2 ) r+ and integration between the limits r+ = 0 and r+ = 1 yields 1 ψm (1 − r ) r dr = +2

+

+

∞ n=0

0

1 ψm ψn (1 − r+2 ) r+ dr+ .

an 0

All the integrals on the right hand side disappear when m = n, yielding (3.245). In order to show that this applies, we write (3.242) for the eigenvalues βm and βn : d + 2 (r ψm) = −βm (1 − r+2 ) r+ ψm dr+ d + (r ψn ) = −βn2 (1 − r+2 ) r+ ψn . dr+ Multiplication of the ﬁrst equation with ψn and of the second with ψm gives ψn

d + 2 (r ψm ) = −βm (1 − r+2 ) r+ ψm ψn dr+

ψm

d + (r ψn ) = −βn2 (1 − r+2 ) r+ ψn ψm , dr+

668

Appendix A: Supplements

which can also be written as d + 2 (r ψn ψm ) − r+ ψn ψm = −βm (1 − r+2 ) r+ ψm ψn dr+ d + (r ψn ψm ) − r+ ψn ψm = −βn2 (1 − r+2 ) r+ ψn ψm . dr+ Subtraction of both equations and integration between the limits r+ = 0 and r+ = 1 yields r

+

(ψn ψm

−

ψn

1 1 2 2 ψm ) = (βn − βm ) ψm ψn (1 − r+2 ) r+ dr+ . 0

0

The left hand side disappears because of ψm (r+ = 1) = ψn (r+ = 1) = 0 and ψm (r+ = 0) = ψn (r+ = 0) = 0. This means that the integral on the right hand side must also vanish when n = m.

•

Appendix B: Property data

Table B 1: Properties of air at pressure p = 1 bar ϑ C

kg/m3

cp kJ/kg K

β 10−3 /K

λ 10−3 W/K m

ν 10−6 m2 /s

a 10−6 m2 /s

Pr —

−200 −194.36 −191.54 −180 −160 −140 −120 −100 −80 −60 −40 −20 −10 0 20 40 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

900.8 875.5 4.442 3.838 3.123 2.639 2.287 2.019 1.808 1.637 1.496 1.377 1.325 1.276 1.189 1.112 0.9862 0.9333 0.8858 0.8428 0.8039 0.7684 0.7359 0.6075 0.5172 0.4503 0.3988 0.3578 0.3245 0.2968 0.2735

1.915 1.933 1.089 1.052 1.027 1.017 1.012 1.009 1.007 1.006 1.006 1.006 1.006 1.006 1.006 1.007 1.010 1.012 1.014 1.016 1.017 1.022 1.025 1.045 1.067 1.093 1.115 1.136 1.154 1.171 1.185

4.883 5.233 13.87 11.61 9.224 7.712 6.647 5.849 5.226 4.725 4.313 3.968 3.815 3.674 3.421 3.201 2.836 2.683 2.546 2.423 2.310 2.208 2.115 1.745 1.486 1.293 1.145 1.027 0.9317 0.8523 0.7853

149.6 140.2 7.673 8.803 10.73 12.61 14.43 16.21 17.92 19.60 21.22 22.81 23.59 24.36 25.87 27.35 30.225 31.62 32.99 34.34 35.66 36.96 38.25 44.42 50.24 55.80 61.14 66.31 71.35 76.27 81.10

2.296 1.912 13.08 17.28 25.62 35.29 46.22 58.34 71.59 85.93 101.3 117.7 126.2 135.0 153.2 172.3 213.0 234.6 257.0 280.1 304.0 328.6 353.9 490.7 643.5 811.2 993.0 1188 1397 1618 1851

0.867 0.828 15.86 21.81 33.48 47.01 62.38 79.54 98.41 118.9 141.1 164.7 177.1 189.8 216.3 244.2 303.5 335.0 367.5 401.0 435.4 470.8 507.0 699.5 908.9 1134 1375 1631 1905 2195 2503

2.647 2.308 0.8248 0.7921 0.7653 0.7507 0.7409 0.7335 0.7275 0.7224 0.7181 0.7143 0.7126 0.7110 0.7081 0.7056 0.7018 0.7004 0.6994 0.6986 0.6982 0.6980 0.6981 0.7061 0.7081 0.7154 0.7224 0.7284 0.7333 0.7370 0.7396

◦

670

Appendix B: Property data

Table B 2: Properties of water at pressure p = 1 bar Liquid water λ 10−3 W/K m

ν 10−6 m2 /s

a 10−6 m2 /s

Pr —

−0.0677 0.0163 0.0881 0.1509 0.2068

562.0 572.3 582.0 591.0 598.5

1.792 1.518 1.306 1.139 1.003

0.1332 0.1361 0.1388 0.1412 0.1433

13.45 11.15 9.414 8.063 7.003

4.182 4.180 4.179 4.179 4.179

0.2569 0.3029 0.3453 0.3849 0.4222

607.5 615.0 622.0 628.6 634.8

0.893 0.801 0.723 0.658 0.602

0.1457 0.1478 0.1497 0.1516 0.1534

6.127 5.419 4.831 4.339 3.922

988.05 985.71 983.21 980.57 977.78

4.180 4.181 4.183 4.185 4.188

0.4574 0.4910 0.5231 0.5541 0.5841

640.5 645.8 650.8 655.4 659.6

0.553 0.511 0.474 0.441 0.413

0.1551 0.1567 0.1582 0.1597 0.1611

3.566 3.260 2.995 2.764 2.562

75 80 85 90 95

974.86 971.80 968.62 965.32 961.89

4.192 4.196 4.200 4.205 4.211

0.6132 0.6417 0.6695 0.6970 0.7241

663.5 667.0 670.2 673.0 675.5

0.387 0.364 0.344 0.325 0.309

0.1624 0.1636 0.1647 0.1658 0.1668

2.384 2.227 2.087 1.963 1.852

99.606a

958.64

4.216

0.7489

677.6

0.295

0.1676

1.759

a

◦

ϑ C

kg/m3

cp kJ/kg K

0 5 10 15 20

999.84 999.97 999.70 999.10 998.21

4.219 4.205 4.195 4.189 4.181

25 30 35 40 45

997.05 995.65 994.04 992.22 990.22

50 55 60 65 70

β 10−3 /K

Saturated state

Water vapour ◦

ϑ C

kg/m3

cp kJ/kg K

β 10−3 /K

λ 10−3 W/K m

ν 10−6 m2 /s

a 10−6 m2 /s

Pr —

100 150 200 250 300

0.5897 0.5164 0.4603 0.4156 0.3790

2.077 1.985 1.975 1.989 2.012

2.899 2.452 2.159 1.938 1.761

25.08 28.86 33.28 38.17 43.42

20.81 27.47 35.14 43.84 53.54

20.48 28.16 36.60 46.17 56.94

1.016 0.9755 0.9601 0.9495 0.9403

350 400 450 500 600

0.3483 0.3223 0.2999 0.2805 0.2483

2.040 2.070 2.102 2.134 2.203

1.615 1.493 1.388 1.297 1.147

48.97 54.76 60.77 66.98 79.90

64.23 75.86 88.43 101.9 131.4

68.92 82.09 96.42 111.9 146.1

0.9319 0.9242 0.9171 0.9106 0.8993

700 800 900 1000

0.2227 0.2019 0.1847 0.1702

2.273 2.343 2.412 2.478

1.029 0.9327 0.8530 0.7858

93.38 107.3 121.7 136.3

164.1 199.9 238.6 280.1

184.4 226.8 273.1 323.2

0.8898 0.8815 0.8739 0.8665

Appendix B: Property data

671

Table B 3: Properties of water in the saturated state from the triple point to the critical point ϑ C

p bar

0.01 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 250 300 350 373.946

0.006117 0.012281 0.023388 0.042455 0.073814 0.12344 0.19932 0.31176 0.47373 0.70117 1.0132 1.4324 1.9848 2.7002 3.6119 4.7572 6.1766 7.9147 10.019 12.542 15.536 39.736 85.838 165.21 220.64

◦

kg/m3

999.78 0.004855 999.69 0.009404 998.19 0.01731 995.61 0.03040 992.17 0.05121 987.99 0.08308 983.16 0.13030 977.75 0.19823 971.79 0.29336 965.33 0.42343 958.39 0.59750 951,00 0.82601 943.16 1.1208 934.88 1.4954 926.18 1.9647 917.06 2.5454 907.50 3.2564 897.51 4.1181 887.06 5.1539 876.15 6.3896 864.74 7.8542 799.07 19.956 712.41 46.154 574.69 113.48 322.00 322.00

cp cp kJ/kg K 4.229 1.868 4.188 1.882 4.183 1.882 4.183 1.892 4.182 1.904 4.182 1.919 4.183 1.937 4.187 1.958 4.194 1.983 4.204 2.011 4.217 2.044 4.232 2.082 4.249 2.126 4.267 2.176 4.288 2.233 4.312 2.299 4.339 2.374 4.369 2.460 4.403 2.558 4.443 2.670 4.489 2.797 4.857 3.772 5.746 5.981 10.13 16.11 ∞ ∞

β β 10−3 /K −0.08044 3.672 0.08720 3.548 0.2089 3.435 0.3050 3.332 0.3859 3.240 0.4572 3.156 0.5222 3.083 0.5827 3.018 0.6403 2.964 0.6958 2.919 0.7501 2.884 0.8038 2.860 0.8576 2.846 0.9123 2.844 0.9683 2.855 1.026 2.878 1.087 2.916 1.152 2.969 1.221 3.039 1.296 3.128 1.377 3.238 1.955 4.245 3.273 7.010 10.37 22.12 ∞ ∞

Δhv kJ/kg 2500.5 2476.9 2453.3 2429.7 2405.9 2381.9 2357.6 2333.1 2308.1 2282.7 2256.7 2229.9 2202.4 2174.0 2144.6 2114.1 2082.3 2049.2 2014.5 1978.2 1940.1 1715.4 1404.7 893.03 0

672

Appendix B: Property data

Table B 3: (Continued)

ϑ C

λ λ 10−3 W/K m

0.01 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 250 300 350 373.946

561.0 17.07 580.0 17.62 598.4 18.23 615.4 18.89 630.5 19.60 643.5 20.36 654.3 21.18 663.1 22.07 670.0 23.01 675.3 24.02 679.1 25.09 681.7 26.24 683.2 27.46 683.7 28.76 683.3 30.14 682.1 31.59 680.0 33.12 677.1 34.74 673.4 36.44 668.8 38.23 663.4 40.10 621.4 51.23 547.7 69.49 447.6 134.6 141.9 141.9

◦

ν ν −6 2 10 m /s 1.792 1.307 1,004 0.8012 0.6584 0.5537 0.4746 0.4132 0.3648 0.3258 0.2941 0.2680 0.2462 0.2278 0.2123 0.1991 0.1877 0.1779 0.1693 0.1619 0.1554 0.1329 0.1207 0.1146 0.1341

1898.0 1006.0 562.0 329.3 201.3 127.8 83.91 56.80 39.51 28.17 20.53 15.27 11.56 8.894 6.946 5.496 4.402 3.565 2.915 2.405 2,001 0.8766 0.4257 0.2098 0.1341

a a −6 2 10 m /s

P r

0.1327 1883.0 0.1385 999.8 0.1433 559.6 0.1478 328.3 0.1519 200.9 0.1558 127.7 0.1591 83.92 0.1620 56.85 0.1644 39.56 0.1664 28.20 0.1680 20.55 0.1694 15.26 0.1705 11.53 0.1714 8.840 0.1720 6.869 0.1725 5.399 0.1727 4.285 0.1727 3.430 0.1724 2.764 0.1718 2.241 0.1709 0.825 0.1601 0.6804 0.1338 0.2517 0.07692 0.07365 0 0

13.51 9.434 7,005 5.422 4.333 3.555 2.983 2.551 2.219 1.958 1.750 1.582 1.444 1.329 1.234 1.154 1.087 1.030 0.9822 0.9423 0.9093 0.8299 0.9018 1.490 ∞

P r

σ 10−3 N/m

1,008 1,006 1,004 1,003 1,002 1,001 1,000 0.9992 0.9989 0.9989 0.9994 1,001 1,003 1,006 1.011 1.018 1.027 1.039 1.055 1.073 1.096 1.288 1.691 2.849 ∞

75.65 74.22 72.74 71.20 69.60 67.95 66.24 64.49 62.68 60.82 58.92 56.97 54.97 52.94 50.86 48.75 46.60 44.41 42.20 39.95 37.68 26.05 14.37 3.675 0

—

Appendix B: Property data

673

Table B 4: Properties of ammonia at pressure p = 1 bar

◦

ϑ C

−70 −60 −50 −40 −30.59 −30.59 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 200 250 300

kg/m3

cp kJ/kg K

β 10−3 /K

λ 10−3 W/K m

ν 10−7 m2 /s

a 10−7 m2 /s

Pr —

724.7 713.6 702.1 690.2 682.3 0.8787 0.8641 0.8263 0.7923 0.7612 0.7328 0.7066 0.6823 0.6597 0.6387 0.6190 0.6005 0.5832 0.5668 0.5513 0.5367 0.5229 0.5098 0.4973 0.4854 0.4337 0.3920 0.3577

4.245 4.303 4.360 4.414 4.447 2.295 2.273 2.226 2.196 2.178 2.168 2.164 2.164 2.169 2.176 2.185 2.196 2.209 2.223 2.238 2.254 2.271 2.289 2.307 2.326 2.426 2.533 2.645

1.500 1.587 1.673 1.760 1.817 4.725 4.610 4.331 4.097 3.897 3.722 3.567 3.428 3.301 3.186 3.079 2.981 2.889 2.804 2.724 2.648 2.578 2.511 2.447 2.387 2.128 1.921 1.751

792.2 757.1 722.4 688.1 666.6 20.95 21.12 21.64 22.24 22.91 23.67 24.49 25.39 26.36 27.39 28.48 29.64 30.85 32.12 33.44 34.81 36.22 37.68 39.17 40.69 48.69 56.92 64.77

6.557 5.485 4.685 4.076 3.758 91.57 94.49 102.9 111.6 120.8 130.3 140.3 150.6 161.4 172.6 184.1 196.1 208.5 221.3 234.5 248.1 262.1 276.5 291.3 306.4 387.9 478.4 577.8

2.575 2.466 2.360 2.259 2.197 103.9 107.6 117.6 127.8 138.2 149.0 160.2 171.9 184.2 197.1 210.6 224.7 239.5 254.9 271.0 287.7 305.0 322.9 341.4 360.5 462.9 573.2 684.7

2.546 2.225 1.985 1.804 1.711 0.8811 0.8786 0.8746 0.8735 0.8738 0.8746 0.8755 0.8760 0.8760 0.8755 0.8744 0.8727 0.8706 0.8682 0.8654 0.8624 0.8593 0.8562 0.8530 0.8500 0.8380 0.8347 0.8439

674

Appendix B: Property data

Table B 5: Properties of carbon dioxide at pressure p = 1 bar ϑ C

kg/m3

cp kJ/kg K

β 10−3 /K

λ 10−3 W/K m

ν 10−7 m2 /s

a 10−7 m2 /s

Pr —

−50 −40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 140 160 180 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

2.403 2.296 2.198 2.109 2.027 1.951 1.880 1.815 1.754 1.697 1.644 1.594 1.547 1.503 1.461 1.422 1.349 1.283 1.224 1.169 1.120 0.9238 0.7864 0.6846 0.6061 0.5438 0.4931 0.4511

0.7825 0.7903 0.7988 0.8078 0.8172 0.8267 0.8363 0.8459 0.8555 0.8650 0.8744 0.8837 0.8929 0.9018 0.9107 0.9193 0.9361 0.9523 0.9678 0.9827 0.9971 1.061 1.114 1.159 1.196 1.227 1.253 1.275

4.682 4.453 4.248 4.063 3.896 3.742 3.601 3.471 3.351 3.239 3.134 3.037 2.945 2.859 2.778 2.702 2.561 2.435 2.321 2.217 2.122 1.749 1.488 1.294 1.146 1.028 0.9320 0.8525

11.10 11.77 12.45 13.17 13.90 14.66 15.43 16.22 17.03 17.84 18.67 19.50 20.34 21.18 22.03 22.87 24.57 26.27 27.96 29.64 31.31 39.47 47.26 54.70 61.84 68.69 75.30 81.69

46.69 51.05 55.60 60.32 65.21 70.28 75.51 80.92 86.49 92.22 98.12 104.2 110.4 116.8 123.3 129.9 143.7 158.1 173.0 188.4 204.4 291.8 390.6 499.5 617.7 744.3 878.9 1021

59.05 64.85 70.92 77.28 83.94 90.89 98.13 105.7 113.5 121.5 129.8 138.4 147.2 156.3 165.5 175.0 194.6 215.0 236.1 257.9 280.5 402.6 539.4 689.7 853.2 1030 1219 1420

0.7907 0.7873 0.7839 0.7805 0.7769 0.7732 0.7695 0.7659 0.7623 0.7589 0.7557 0.7526 0.7498 0.7471 0.7447 0.7425 0.7386 0.7353 0.7327 0.7306 0.7289 0.7248 0.7242 0.7242 0.7239 0.7229 0.7212 0.7189

◦

Appendix B: Property data

675

Table B 6: Properties of nitrogen at pressure p = 1 bar

◦

ϑ C

−210 −200 −190 −180 −160 −120 −100 −90 −80 −70 −60 −50 −40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 140 160 180 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

kg/m3

cp kJ/kg K

β 10−3 /K

λ 10−3 W/K m

ν 10−7 m2 /s

a 10−7 m2 /s

Pr —

867.4 825.0 4.195 3.707 3.019 2.212 1.953 1.845 1.749 1.662 1.583 1.512 1.447 1.387 1.332 1.281 1.234 1.190 1.150 1.112 1.076 1.043 1.011 0.9818 0.9539 0.9276 0.9027 0.8568 0.8153 0.7776 0.7433 0.7118 0.5876 0.5003 0.4356 0.3857 0.3461 0.3139

2.000 2.024 1.102 1.080 1.061 1.048 1.045 1.045 1.044 1.043 1.043 1.042 1.042 1.042 1.042 1.042 1.041 1.041 1.041 1.041 1.041 1.042 1.042 1.042 1.042 1.043 1.043 1.044 1.046 1.048 1.050 1.053 1.070 1.092 1.116 1.140 1.162 1.182

4.727 5.339 13.32 11.53 9.200 6.643 5.847 5.518 5.224 4.961 4.724 4.508 4.312 4.132 3.967 3.814 3.673 3.542 3.420 3.307 3.200 3.101 3.007 2.919 2.836 2.757 2.683 2.546 2.422 2.310 2.208 2.114 1.745 1.485 0.8522 1.145 1.027 0.9316

176.1 155.7 8.061 9.108 11.13 14.86 16.59 17.43 18.24 19.04 19.83 20.59 21.35 22.09 22.81 23.53 24.23 24.92 25.60 26.27 26.93 27.59 28.23 28.87 29.50 30.13 30.75 31.97 33.18 34.37 35.55 36.72 42.47 48.12 53.68 59.13 64.45 69.63

2.489 1.929 13.04 16.73 25.19 46.06 58.30 64.83 71.63 78.70 86.01 93.58 101.4 109.4 117.7 126.2 134.9 143.9 153.1 162.4 172.0 181.8 191.8 202.0 212.4 223.0 233.8 255.9 278.8 302.4 326.8 351.8 487.1 638.4 804.8 985.6 1180 1388

1.015 0.9327 17.44 22.74 34.75 64.11 81.27 90.42 99.95 109.8 120.1 130.7 141.6 152.8 164.4 176.3 188.5 201.0 213.8 226.9 240.3 254.0 268.0 282.2 296.7 311.5 326.5 357.3 389.1 421.9 455.6 490.2 675.8 881.0 1104 1345 1603 1887

2.451 2.068 0.7477 0.7355 0.7248 0.7185 0.7174 0.7170 0.7167 0.7165 0.7163 0.7162 0.7161 0.7160 0.7159 0.7158 0.7158 0.7158 0.7157 0.7157 0.7157 0.7158 0.7158 0.7158 0.7159 0.7160 0.7160 0.7163 0.7165 0.7169 0.7173 0.7177 0.7208 0.7247 0.7288 0.7327 0.7363 0.7394

676

Appendix B: Property data

Table B 7: Properties of oxygen at pressure p = 1 bar

◦

ϑ C

−210 −200 −190 −180 −160 −140 −120 −100 −90 −80 −70 −60 −50 −40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20 25

kg/m3

cp kJ/kg K

β 10−3 /K

λ W/K m

ν 10−7 m2 /s

a 10−7 m2 /s

Pr —

1268 1222 1175 4.254 3.458 2.921 2.530 2.233 2.110 1.999 1.900 1.810 1.728 1.654 1.585 1.522 1.464 1.410 1.360 1.314 1.292

1.676 1.678 1.685 0.9473 0.9305 0.9237 0.9191 0.9164 0.9155 0.9149 0.9145 0.9143 0.9142 0.9144 0.9147 0.9152 0.9158 0.9167 0.9177 0.9189 0.9196

3.53 3.78 4.08 11.7 9.26 7.74 6.66 5.86 5.53 5.23 4.97 4.73 4.51 4.32 4.14 3.97 3.82 3.67 3.54 3.42 3.36

0.190 0.175 0.161 0.0843 0.0103 0.0122 0.0141 0.0159 0.0168 0.0176 0.0185 0.0194 0.0200 0.0210 0.0219 0.0227 0.0235 0.0244 0.0252 0.0260 0.0263

3.93 2.70 2.02 16.9 25.2 34.9 45.8 58.0 64.6 71.4 78.4 85.9 93.6 102 110 118 127 136 145 154 159

0.892 0.854 0.813 20.9 32.1 45.3 60.5 77.6 86.8 96.5 106 117 128 139 151 163 176 188 202 215 222

4.41 3.16 2.48 0.81 0.78 0.77 0.76 0.75 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72

Appendix B: Property data

677

Table B 8: Properties of helium at pressure p = 1 bar T K 4 4.2163 4.2163 5 6 8 10 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 350 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500

kg/m3

cp kJ/kg K

β 10−3 /K

λ 10−3 W/K m

ν 10−7 m2 /s

a 10−7 m2 /s

Pr —

129.9 125.0 16.53 11.78 9.028 6.344 4.949 2.408 1.200 0.8006 0.6007 0.4807 0.4007 0.3435 0.3006 0.2672 0.2405 0.2187 0.2005 0.1851 0.1719 0.1604 0.1375 0.1203 0.09626 0.08022 0.06876 0.06017 0.05348 0.04814 0.04376 0.04011 0.03703 0.03438 0.03209

4.396 5.243 9.015 6.735 6.011 5.575 5.426 5.250 5.206 5.198 5.196 5.194 5.194 5.194 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193

152.6 204.6 616.3 326.3 222.2 143.6 108.4 50.64 25.00 16.64 12.48 9.986 8.323 7.135 6.244 5.551 4.996 4.542 4.164 3.844 3.569 3.332 2.856 2.499 1.999 1.666 1.428 1.250 1.111 0.9999 0.9090 0.8332 0.7692 0.7142 0.6666

18.62 18.64 9.005 10.22 11.74 14.49 16.89 26.20 40.44 52.55 63.52 73.71 83.33 92.50 101.3 109.8 118.0 126.0 133.7 141.3 148.7 156.0 173.5 190.4 222.3 252.4 281.1 308.5 335.0 360.6 385.5 409.7 433.3 456.4 479.0

0.2562 0.2534 0.7505 1.1789 1.750 3.049 4.563 14.87 46.17 88.89 141.6 203.4 269.4 347.7 434.0 528.1 629.5 738.3 854.1 976.9 1106 1243 1611 2019 2947 4016 5220 6554 8011 9590 11285 13094 15014 17043 19178

0.3262 0.2845 0.6042 1.288 2.163 4.097 6.290 20.72 64.72 126.3 203.5 295.2 400.4 518.5 648.8 791.0 944.5 1109 1285 1470 1666 1873 2430 3047 4447 6059 7871 9874 12061 14426 16963 19667 22534 25560 28742

0.785 0.891 1.24 0.916 0.809 0.744 0.725 0.718 0.713 0.704 0.696 0.689 0.673 0.671 0.669 0.668 0.667 0.666 0.665 0.664 0.664 0.664 0.663 0.663 0.663 0.663 0.663 0.664 0.664 0.665 0.666 0.666 0.666 0.667 0.667

678

Appendix B: Property data

Table B 9: Diﬀusion coeﬃcients at pressure p = 1.01325 bar = 1 atm a) Gases The pressure and temperature dependency in the ideal gas state can be estimated from D ∼ T 1.75 /p. Substances

N2 – CO2

N2 – CH4

N2 – C2 H6

N2 – SF6

ϑ C

D 10−4 m2 /s

D 10−4 m2 /s

D 10−4 m2 /s

D 10−4 m2 /s

0 20 40 60 80 100 200 300 400 500

0.1391 0.1583 0.1785 0.1997 0.2217 0.2446 0.3714 0.5175 0.6814 0.8621

0.1955 0.2219 0.2495 0.2784 0.3084 0.3396 0.5122 0.7106 0.9331 1.1785

0.1302 0.1481 0.1669 0.1865 0.2069 0.2281 0.3455 0.4806 0.6322 0.7993

0.0869 0.0987 0.1110 0.1239 0.1373 0.1512 0.2281 0.3166 0.4159 0.5254

◦

Substance Air – CO2 Air – C2 H5 OH Air – He Air – H2 O CO2 – H2 O He – H2 O H2 – H2 O CH4 – H2 O

T

D

K

10−4 m2 /s

276 317 313 276 313 307 352 307 352

0.144 0.179 0.147 0.632 0.292 0.201 1.136 0.927 0.361

b) Diluted aqueous solutions Substances CH4 – H2 O CO2 – H2 O CH3 OH – H2 O C2 H5 OH – H2 O O2 – H2 O N2 – H2 O H2 – H2 O

T

D

K

10−9 m2 /s

275 333 298 288 288 298 298 298

0.85 3.55 2,00 1.26 1.0 2.4 2.6 6.3

Appendix B: Property data

679

Table B 10: Thermophysical properties of non-metallic solids at 20 ◦ C. Substance Acrylic glass (plexiglass) Asphalt Bakelite Concrete Ice (0 ◦ C) Ground, coarse gravel Sandy ground, dry Sand ground, damp Clay soil Fat Glass, windowmirrorQuartzThermometerPlaster Granite Cork sheets Marble Mortar Paper Polyethylene Polyamide Polytetraﬂuoroethylene (Teﬂon) PVC Porcelain (95 ◦ C) Hard coal Pine wood (radial) Plasterwork Celluloid Brick

103 kg/m3

c kJ/kgK

λ W/K m

a 10−6 m2 /s

1.18 2.12 1.27 2.1 0.917 2.04 1.65 1.75 1.45 0.91 2.48 2.70 2.21 2.58 1.00 2.75 0.19 2.6 1.9 0.7 0.92 1.13

1.44 0.92 1.59 0.88 2.04 1.84 0.80 1.00 0.88 1.93 0.70 0.80 0.73 0.78 1.09 0.89 1.88 0.80 0.80 1.20 2.30 1.6

0.184 0.70 0.233 1.0 2.25 0.52 0.27 0.58 1.28 0.16 0.87 0.76 1.40 0.97 0.51 2.9 0.041 2.8 0.93 0.12 0.35 0.29

0.108 0.36 0.115 0.54 1.203 0.14 0.20 0.33 1.00 0.091 0.50 0.35 0.87 0.48 0.47 1.18 0.115 1.35 0.61 0.14 0.17 0.16

2.20 1.38 2.40 1.35 0.415 1.69 1.38 1.6 . . . 1.8

1.04 0.96 1.08 1.26 2.72 0.80 1.67 0.84

0.23 0.15 1.03 0.26 0.14 0.79 0.23 0.38 . . . 0.52

0.10 0.11 0.40 0.15 0.12 0.58 0.10 0.28 . . . 0.34

680

Appendix B: Property data

Table B 11: Thermophysical properties of metals and alloys at 20 ◦ C. Substance Metals Aluminium Lead Chromium Iron Gold Iridium Copper Magnesium Manganese Molybdenum Sodium Nickel Platinum Rhodium Silver Titanium Uranium Tungsten Zinc Tin, white Zirconium Alloys Bronze (84 Cu, 9 Zn, 6 Sn, 1 Pb) Duraluminium Cast iron Carbon steel (< 0.4 % C) Cr-Ni-Steel (X12 CrNi 18,8) Cr-Steel (X8 Cr17)

103 kg/m3

c kJ/kgK

λ W/Km

a 10−6 m2 /s

2.70 11.3 6.92 7.86 19.26 22.42 8.93 1.74 7.42 10.2 9.71 8.85 21.37 12.44 10.5 4.5 18.7 19.0 7.10 7.29 6.45

0.888 0.129 0.440 0.452 0.129 0.130 0.382 1.020 0.473 0.251 1.220 0.448 0.133 0.248 0.235 0.522 0.175 0.134 0.387 0.225 0.290

237 35 91 81 316 147 399 156 21 138 133 91 71 150 427 22 28 173 121 67 23

98.8 24.0 29.9 22.8 127.2 50.4 117.0 87.9 6.0 53.9 11.2 23.0 25.0 48.6 173.0 9.4 8.6 67.9 44.0 40.8 12.3

8.8 2.7 7.8 7.85 7.8 7.7

0.377 0.912 0.54 0.465 0.50 0.46

62 165 42 . . . 50 45 . . . 55 15 25

18.7 67.0 10 . . . 12 12 . . . 15 3.8 7.1

Appendix B: Property data

681

Table B 12: Emissivities of non-metallic surfaces. εn Total emissivity in the direction of the surface normal, ε hemispherical total emissivity. Substance

ϑ/ ◦ C

Acrylic glass (plexiglass) Concrete, rough Beechwood Tar rooﬁng Oakwood, planed Ice, smooth, thickness > 4 mm Enamel paint, white Tiles, light grey Floor covering (Pegulan) Rubber Glazed tiles, white Coal Cork Paint, black, gloss Marble, polished Oil paints, 16 diﬀerent colours Oil, thick layer Paper, white, matt Plaster Polytetraﬂuoroethylene (Teﬂon) Pyrex glass White frost coating, rough Sand Fire clay Emery (corundum), rough Table glass, 6 mm thick

20 . . . 60 0 . . . 93 70 20 0 . . . 93 −9.6 20 25 20 . . . 60 20 25 150 25 25 0 . . . 93

Water, thickness > 0.1 mm Brick, red

100 21 95 0 . . . 200 20 . . . 100 −170 . . . 430 0 20 1000 84 −60 . . . 0 60 120 10 . . . 50 0 . . . 93

εn

ε

0.97 0.94 0.91 0.965 0.91 0.92 0.94 0.92 0.93 0.81 0.80 0.88

0.94 0.91 0.90 0.918

0.90 0.92 . . . 0.96 0.82 0.92 0.97 0.85 0.985 0.76 0.75 0.855 0.910 0.913 0.919 0.965

0.89 0.91

0.842

0.91 0.93

682

Appendix B: Property data

Table B 13: Emissivities of metal surfaces. εn total emissivity in the direction of the surface normal, ε hemispherical total emissivity. Where the temperature interval is stated, the emissivity may be linearly interpolated between the given values. Substance Aluminium, polished rough rolled smooth commercial foil oxidised at 600 ◦ C strongly oxidised Lead, not oxidised grey oxidised Chromium, polished oxidised by red heat Iron, polished oxidised polished with emery electrolytically polished casting skin rusted very rusted Gold, polished oxidised Copper, polished oxidised highly oxidised

Magnesium, rolled shiny Brass, polished matt oxidised Nickel, polished

oxidised Platinum, polished Platinum wire Mercury, not oxidised Silver, polished Steel, material No. DIN 1.4301=AISI 304 polished sand blasted, Ra = 2.1 μm Bismuth, smooth Tungsten, aged Zinc, polished grey oxidised Tin, shiny

ϑ/ ◦ C

εn

20 75 170 100 200 . . . 600 100 . . . 500 127 . . . 227 20 150 400 . . . 800 −73 . . . 727 −73 . . . 727 25 150 100 25 20 227 . . . 627 −173 . . . 827 327 . . . 727 130 25 327 427 527 . . . 727 118 25 50 . . . 350 200 . . . 600 100 127 . . . 1127 127 . . . 727 227 . . . 627 127 . . . 1127 127 . . . 1527 227 . . . 1377 25 . . . 100 127 . . . 527 127 . . . 927

0.045 0.055 . . . 0.07 0.039 0.09 0.11 . . . 0.19 0,32 . . . 0.31 0.06 . . . 0.08 0.28 0.058 0.11 . . . 0.32 0.04 . . . 0.19 0.32 . . . 0.60 0.24 0.128 0.80 0.61 0.85 0.020 . . . 0.035

50 . . . 200 −50 . . . 200 80 1327 . . . 2427 227 . . . 327 25 25

ε

0.049

0.06 . . . 0.25

0.158

0.013 . . . 0.070 0.012 . . . 0.019 0.76 0.78 0.83 0.89 0.91 . . . 0.92 0.048 0.038 . . . 0.043 0.22 0.60 0.045 0.07 . . . 0.19

0.725

0.053

0.053 0.09 . . . 0.15

0.37 . . . 0.47 0.05 . . . 0.16 0.07 . . . 0.21 0.07 . . . 0.18 0.10 . . . 0.12 0.020 . . . 0.030 0.020 . . . 0.047

0.111 . . . 0.132 0.446 . . . 0.488 0.340 0.04 . . . 0.05 0.23 . . . 0.25 0.064

0.366 0.20 . . . 0.31

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

Chapter 1: Introduction. Technical Applications 1.1: Q˙ = 484 W; for the concrete blocks Q˙ = 270 W 1.3: By diﬀerentiation of q˙ = −λ(ϑ) dϑ/ dx follows dλ d2 ϑ/ dx2 <0 . = −λ dϑ ( dϑ/ dx)2 λ decreases with rising temperature. 1.4: Imax = 28.6 A 1.5: ϑW1 = 38.9 ◦ C 1.6: a) ϑmax = ϑ0 along the hypotenuse y = x; ϑmin = ϑ0 −ϑ1 at x = l, y = 0.ϑ1 = ϑmax −ϑmin .

2 2 x + y ˙ = 2λϑ1 is b) gradϑ = 2ϑ1 − x ex + y ey , q˙ = 2λϑ1 x ex − y ey , |q| l l l l l l l l l largest at x = y = l. c) y = 0 : Q˙ 1 = 0; x = l : Q˙ 2 = −2λhϑ1 ; y = x : Q˙ 3 = 2λhϑ1 = −Q˙ 2 . 1.7: α = 6241 W/m2 K 1.8: α = 5.0 W/m2 K 1.9: αW /αA = 578 1.10: ϑi = 552 ◦ C, ϑo = 548 ◦ C, αrad = 5.33 W/m2 K 1.11: q˙ = 72.7 W/m2 , ϑW1 = 12.6 ◦ C, ϑW2 = −9.1 ◦ C 1.12: q˙ = 15.35 W/m2 , ϑW1 = 20.0 ◦ C ˙ 1.13: Q/L = 514 W/m; ϑ3 = 193 ◦ C lies below the permitted value of 250 ◦ C. 1.14: ϑF = 17.0 ◦ C; t∗ = 3.16 h = 3 h 10 min. These values are valid under the assumption that one of the circular ends is adiabatic. + 1.15: ϑ+ 1 (z) := [ϑ1 (z) − ϑ2 ] / (ϑ1 − ϑ2 ); ϑ2 (z) := [ϑ2 (z) − ϑ2 ] / (ϑ1 − ϑ2 );

N z N z z z 1− =ε 1 − = 1 − ε ; ϑ+ 2 (z) = 1+N L L 1+N L L ε 1 − C z 1 1 + ; ϑ+ 1 − exp N1 (C1 − 1) C = 1 : ϑ+ 1 (z) = 1 − 2 (z) = C1 ϑ1 (z) + ε1 − 1 1 − C1 L

C = 1 : ϑ+ 1 (z) = 1 −

ε1 = ε1 (N1 , C1 ) is to be calculated according to Table 1.4. 1.16: Countercurrent: kA = 423 W/K; Cross-ﬂow with one tube row: kA = 461 W/K, Cross countercurrent ﬂow with two tube rows as in Fig. 1.59: kA = 433 W/K.

684

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

1.17: Under the assumptions mentioned N˙ A = u jA 2πrL = −D∂cA /∂r2πrL = const and with that ∂ ∂cA dN˙ A =0= Dr . dr ∂r ∂r Integration between the limits cA (r0 ) = cAW and cA (r0 +δ) = cAδ yields the concentration proﬁle cA − cAW ln r/r0 . = cAδ − cAW ln [(r0 + δ)/r0 ] From this, by diﬀerentiation and introduction into the equation for N˙ A the expression given is found. ˜ A = 1.82 · 10−4 kg/(m2 s). 1.18: a) n˙ A = 3.952 · 10−6 kmol/m2 s; m ˙ A = n˙ A M ˜ A A dt evaporates. b) During the time dt an enthalpy amount of m ˙ A A dt = n˙ A M According to the question, the diﬀusion ﬂow is calculated from that of the steady-state solution (1.174), in which we now have y1 = y(t). This is then dt = −

L y2 − y(t) 1 dy = B [y2 − y(t)] dy . ˜ A pD/Rm T ln(pB2 /pB1 ) M

Integration and putting in the numerical values gives t = 17.96 h. 1.19: Equimolar counterdiﬀusion prevails in the tubes. It therefore follows from (1.176): N˙ A = −cDA∂ x ˜A /∂y. As N˙ A is constant, a linear concentration drop over the length L of the tubes develops. It then holds that x ˜Aa − x ˜Ae . N˙ A = −cDA L x ˜Aa = 1 is the mole fraction of the ammonia in the pipes, x˜Ae = 0 that of the ammonia ˜ A N˙ A = in the air. The ammonia loss is found to be N˙ A = 4.03 · 10−13 kmol/s, M˙ A = M 6.87 · 10−12 kg/s. The amount of ammonia ﬂowing through the pipes is M˙ = 1.93 · 10−3 kg/s, which is N˙ = 1.133 · 10−4 kmol/s. The amount of air which gets into the ammonia is ˜ B N˙ B = 1.17 · 10−11 kg/s. The mole fraction N˙ B = −N˙ A = −4.03 · 10−13 kmol/s, M˙ B = M of air in the pipes is extremely small, namely x ˜B = |N˙ B |/N˙ = 3.56 · 10−9 . 1.20: Unidirectional mass transfer prevails. From (1.195), we have ˜ A n˙ A = M ˜A m ˙A=M

1−x ˜Aδ p kg β ln = 3.59 · 10−5 2 . Rm T 1−x ˜A0 m s

In order to use (1.195a), the moisture content is required XA = 1.530 · 10−2 ,

m ˙ A = 3.635 · 10−5 kg/m2 s .

1.21: From (1.210) and (1.203), using steam tables, the solution is found by trial and error to be ϑI = 2.56 ◦ C. It is ps (2.56 ◦ C) = 7.346 mbar. 1.22: We will assume a small blowing rate. The lowest temperature is the wet bulb temperature ϑI . In (1.211), the factor is ˜ A cβm cpA M ˜ B cβm ˜B M M = = 1.097 · 10−3 mol K/J ˜ αm αm MA cpA This allows (1.211) to be written as follows, as XAδ = 0, (600 − ϑI ) ◦ C = 1.097 · 10−3 · 2346 · 103 · XAI ◦ C . With (1.203), using a steam table, the wet bulb temperature is found through trial and error to be ϑI = 65.1 ◦ C. This value also satisﬁes (1.206) very well. The amount of water fed to the chamber follows from (1.209) as m ˙ A = 2.27 · 10−2 kg/m2 s.

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

685

1.23: The amount of benzene transferred is ΔN˙ B = 11.88 kmol/h. The molar ratio of the gas ˜ o = 0.216. in cross section e is Y˜e = 2.5 · 10−3 . According to (1.224), X

Chapter 2: Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion 2.2: At x = 0, ϑ(x) has a horizontal tangent. The tangent at x = δ intersects the horizontal ϑ = ϑF at point R with the abscissa xR = δ + λ/α = 1 + Bi−1 δ = 1.667 δ. The tangent to the ﬂuid temperature plot at x = δ intersects the line ϑ = ϑF at xF = δ + λF /α = 1 + N u−1 δ = 1.100 δ. 2

2.3: a) The plate heats up, because ∂ 2 ϑ+ /∂x+ > 0. b) x+ T = 1/2; (∂ϑ/∂t)max = 4.40 K/s. c) x+ min = 0.3778. d) B(t) = 0.850 exp −0.03454 s−1 (t − t0 ) . For t → ∞ we have ϑ+ = x+ . ˙R=W ˙ 0 (1 + m/2). ˙ R R/(m + 2); W 2.4: a) q(R) ˙ =W 2 ˙ R W m+2 R . b) Θ(r) = 2 1 − (r/R) λ (m + 2) 0 c) Θmax /Θmax = 2/(m + 2). 2.5: a) ϑ0 = 55.39 ◦ C, ϑL = 37.39 ◦ C. b) Q˙ 0 = 3.204 W, Q˙ L = 0.0622 W. c) The results do not diﬀer within the numbers given. The simple calculation with the replacement bolts of length LC is very exact. 2.6: ηf = 0.603 2.7: a) 87 ﬁns/m. This means the heat ﬂow increases by a factor 6.019. b) 1.40. ˙ 2.8: Q/L = 149 W/m 2.9: a) Q/A = 1027 kJ/m2 . b) ϑ = 50.6 ◦ C 2.10: Surface temperature: 73.1 ◦ C; at 10 cm depth: 27.2 ◦ C. 2.11: Surface temperature: 45.8 ◦ C; at 10 cm depth: 24.3 ◦ C. 2.12: a) The amplitude at a depth of 1 m is only 3.7·10−4 K. b) Highest temperature 18.6 ◦ C on 2nd October, lowest temperature 1.4 ◦ C on 2nd April. 2.13: a) α = 19.3 W/m2 K. b) The temperatures of the insulated surface are ϑ(t1 ) = 146.4 ◦ C and ϑ(t2 ) = 112.3 ◦ C. 2.14: a) ϑ = 37.5 ◦ C. b) ϑm = 39.1 ◦ C; ϑsurf = 37.9 ◦ C; ϑcentre = 40.9 ◦ C 2.15: w = 0.206 m/s 2.16: t(s = 15mm) = 3.26 h; t(s = 20mm) = 3.57 h. 2.18:

i = x/Δx

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

(ϑ+ )6i ϑ+ (x, t∗ ) (ϑ+ )12 i ϑ+ (x, 2t∗ )

1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

0.412 0.419 0.681 0.679

0.140 0.151 0.414 0.409

0.037 0.046 0.216 0.217

0.007 0.012 0.098 0.102

0.001 0.002 0.038 0.042

0.000 0.000 0.012 0.016

0.003 0.005

0.001 0.001

0.000 0.000

686

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

2.19: a) M = 0.375; Bi∗ = 0.2087. The stability criterion M≤

1 = 0.4137 2 (1 + Bi∗ )

◦ 15 ◦ is satisﬁed. Temperature proﬁle at time t∗ = 15 min: ϑ15 1 = 80.0 C; ϑ2 = 63.9 C; ◦ 15 ◦ 15 ◦ 15 ◦ ϑ15 = 50.7 C; ϑ = 40.8 C; ϑ = 34.9 C; ϑ = 30.8 C. 3 4 5 6 ◦ ∞ ◦ ∞ b) Steady-state temperature proﬁle (t → ∞): ϑ∞ 1 = 80.0 C; ϑ2 = 71.6 C; ϑ3 = ◦ ∞ ◦ ∞ ◦ ∞ 64.1 C; ϑ4 = 57.4 C; ϑ5 = 51.3 C; ϑ6 = 45.7 ◦ C. + + 2.20: a) − 2 + m2 Δx2 ϑ+ 1 + ϑ2 + ϑ6 = 0, + 2 2 ϑ+ ϑ+ − 3 + m Δx + ϑ + ϑ+ 1 3 7 = 0, 2+ + + 2 2 ϑ ϑ+ − 3 + m Δx + ϑ + ϑ 2 4 8 = 0, 3+ + + 2 2 ϑ3 − 3 + m Δx ϑ4 + ϑ5 + ϑ+ 9 = 0, 2 2 ϑ+ ϑ+ = 0, 4 − 1 + 0.5m Δx 5 2 ϑ+ Δx2 ϑ+ ϑ+ + ϑ+ 1 − 3+m 6 + 10 = 0, 7+ + + + 2 2 ϑ+ 2 + ϑ6 − 4 + m Δx ϑ7 + ϑ8 + ϑ11 = 0, + + + + 2 2 + ϑ − 4 + m Δx + ϑ + ϑ ϑ ϑ+ 3 7 8 9 12 = 0, + + + 2 2 ϑ4 + ϑ8 − 2 + 0.5m Δx ϑ9 = 0, + 1.90384 ϑ+ + 0.56837m2 Δx2 ϑ+ 6 − 43.5992 10 + (4/3)ϑ11 = −40.35875, + + + 2 2 ϑ+ (4/3)ϑ7 + ϑ10 − 6 + 0.92069m Δx 11 + ϑ12 = −8/3 + + 2 2 ϑ12 = 0. ϑ+ 8 + ϑ11 − 2 + 0.5m Δx + + + b) ϑ+ 1 = 0.54791; ϑ2 = 0.50806; ϑ3 = 0.44968; ϑ4 = 0.39775; + + + ϑ5 = 0.36828; ϑ6 = 0.67543; ϑ7 = 0.60786; ϑ+ 8 = 0.51519; + + + ϑ+ 9 = 0.43891; ϑ10 = 0.97859; ϑ11 = 0.83003; ϑ12 = 0.64674. ηR = 0.5756. Approximation from (2.81): ηR = 0.5758, from (2.82): ηR = 0.5721.

2.21: We choose the ﬁnite elements as in Fig. 2.59 with the diﬀerence that the dimensionless external temperatures ϑ+ = (ϑ − ϑe ) / (ϑi − ϑe ) now are unequal to zero. Their values are ϑ5 , . . . , ϑ10 according to Fig. 2.70. Table 2.14 therefore is to be supplemented by Table C.1. Table C.1: Triangles k = 8, 9, . . . , 16 attributed to the temperatures ϑ+ j , j = 5, 6, . . . , 10 ϑ+ j j= 5 6 7 8 9 10

ϑ+ j is a node point of triangle k k= 8 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

13, 14, 15, 16,

9 10 11 12

The temperature derivatives are the same as in Table 2.15. The integrals I (1) , I (2) , . . . , I (7) remain unchanged. Because heat from the external wall is transferred to the air, the integrals I (8) , I (9) , . . . , I (12) are ⎧ ⎫ ⎨ ∂ϑ+ 2 ∂ϑ+ 2 ⎬ 1 I (k) = dx+ dy + + Bi ϑ+2 x+ = 1 + . + + ⎭ 2⎩ ∂x ∂y Ω+(k)

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

687

The derivates ∂I/∂ϑ+ i are found in the same way as in example 2.10. As a result we + + obtain 11 linear equations with the unknown temperatures ϑ+ 0 , ϑ1 , . . . , ϑ10 : + + 10 ϑ+ 0 − 8 ϑ1 − 5 ϑ5 + + − 18 ϑ+ 1 + 4 ϑ2 + 3 ϑ6 + + + ϑ1 − 4 ϑ2 + ϑ3 + ϑ+ 7 + + + ϑ+ 2 − 4 ϑ3 + ϑ4 + ϑ8 + + ϑ+ 3 − 2 ϑ4 + ϑ9 + + + + + 3 ϑ0 − 15 + 2Δx Bi ϑ5 + 12 − Δx Bi ϑ6 + + + + + 9 ϑ1 + 12 − Δx Bi ϑ5 − 3 9 + 2Δx+ Bi ϑ+ 6 + 2 3 − Δx Bi ϑ7 + + + + + + 6 ϑ+ 2 + 3 − Δx Bi ϑ6 − 4 3 + Δx Bi ϑ7 + 3 − Δx Bi ϑ8 + + + + + + 6 ϑ+ 3 + 3 − Δx Bi ϑ7 − 4 3 + Δx Bi ϑ8 + 3 − Δx Bi ϑ9 + + + + + + 6 ϑ+ 4 + 3 − Δx Bi ϑ8 − 4 3 + Δx Bi ϑ9 + 3 − Δx Bi ϑ10 + + 3 − Δx+ Bi ϑ+ 9 − 3 + 2Δx Bi ϑ10

8 ϑ+ 0

= 1 = −3 = −1 = −1 = 0 = 0 = 0 = 0 = 0 = 0 = 0 .

Inserting Bi = α δ/λ = (10 W/m2 K · 0.25 m)/0.8 W/Km = 3.125 and Δx+ = x/δ = 0.5 resp. Δx+ /2 = 0.25 delivers the following temperatures: ϑ+ 0 = 0.6115 ϑ+ 4 = 0.3286 ϑ+ 8 = 0.2026

ϑ+ 1 = 0.6096 ϑ+ 5 = 0.2378 ϑ+ 9 = 0.1263

ϑ+ 2 = 0.5925 ϑ+ 6 = 0.2372 ϑ+ 10 = 0.0297 .

ϑ+ 3 = 0.5309 ϑ+ 7 = 0.2294

The heat ﬂow from the external wall to the air is δ ϑ+ ϑ+ + 5 10 + ϑ+ . Q˙ = 8 α (ϑi − ϑe ) b 6 + . . . + ϑ9 + 2 4 4 From this follows with α = 10 W/m2 K and δ = 0.25 m: Q˙ = 8.62 b (ϑi − ϑe ) . If instead of the ambient temperature ϑe of the air the temperature ϑo of the outer wall is given according to example 2.8, we obtain Q˙ = 12.85 b λ (ϑi − ϑo ) and hence with λ = 0.8 W/Km: Q˙ = 10.28 b (ϑi − ϑo ) . Due to the additional thermal resistance of the outside air the heat ﬂow reduces to 16, 1%. 2.22: We are looking for the minimum of I=

1 2

L x=0

∂Θ ∂x

2 +

L 1 1 ∂Θ2 . + m2 Θ2 dx + (q˙ Θ) a ∂t λ x=0

Herein is Θ = ϑ − ϑU and according to (2.52): m2 = α U/λ Aq = 4 α/λ d. The prove follows the same scheme as that of (2.340) in chapter 2.5.3: We assume the ˆ (t, x, ε) = Θ (t, x) + ε η (x) unknown function Θ (t, x) embedded in a family of functions Θ and form then the derivates (∂I) / (∂ε) as shown in chapter 2.5.3. For arbitrary values η (x) the derivatives (∂I) / (∂ε) = 0 can only be fulﬁlled at ε = 0, if we have 1 ∂Θ ∂2 Θ − m2 Θ = a ∂t ∂x2

688

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

with the boundary conditions: Θ (t = 0) = 0 ; λ

∂Θ (x = L) ∂Θ (x = 0) + q˙ (x = 0) = 0 ; λ + q˙ (x = L) = 0 . ∂x ∂x

This is the diﬀerential equations, the solution of which minimizes the above integral. With q˙ = q˙ L/λ (SI-Einheit K) and the dimensionless quantities x+ = x/L, t+ = a t/L2 the integral I reads I = I L =

1 2

1 x+ =0

∂Θ ∂x+

2 +

∂Θ2 2 2 + m L Θ dx+ − (q˙ Θ)x+ =0 . ∂t+

Fig. C.1: FEM-grid of the rod We subdivide a single rod into ﬁve equidistant longitudinal sections Δx+ = 0.2 as shown in Fig. C.1. Each section contributes the part I (k) , k = 1, 2, . . . , 5 to the entire integral I . We have

I

(k)

1 2

=

Δx +

Θk − Θk−1 Δx+

2 +

∂ ∂t+

Θk−1 +

Θk − Θk−1 + x Δx+

2

x+ =0

2 Θk − Θk−1 + dx+ − q˙ Θ x+ =0 . + m2 L2 Θk−1 + x Δx+

Integration delivers I (k)

=

d Θk − Θk−1 1 + Δx+ + Θ2k−1 + Θk−1 Θk + Θ2k Δx+ 6 dt 1 + m2 L2 Δx+ Θ2k−1 + Θk−1 Θk + Θ2k − q˙ Θ x+ =0 . 6

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

689

The temperature Θ0 appears only in the ﬁrst section. Therefore we have ∂I /∂Θ0 = ∂I (1) /∂Θ0 = 0. Each of the temperatures Θ1 , . . . , Θ4 appears once in the section above and once in the section below it. Thus we have: ∂I ∂I (k) ∂I (k+1) = + =0 . ∂Θk ∂Θk ∂Θk The temperature Θ5 is only located in the ﬁfth section, hence: ∂I ∂I (5) = =0 . ∂Θ5 ∂Θ5 After formation of ∂I /∂Θk = 0 we obtain the following system of six ordinary diﬀerential equations with the temperatures Θi , i = 0, 1, . . . , 5 as functions of time: Θ0 − Θ 1 +

+2 Δx+2 ˙ ˙ 1 + m2 L2 Δx (2 Θ0 + Θ1 ) − q˙ Δx+ = 0 . 2 Θ0 + Θ 6 6

For i = 1, 2, . . . , 4 we have: Θi−1 + 2 Θi − Θi+1

+

Δx+2 ˙ ˙i+Θ ˙ i−1 Θi−1 + 4 Θ 6 + m2 L 2

Δx+2 (Θi−1 + 4 Θi + Θi+1 ) = 0 , 6

and it is Θ5 − Θ4 +

+2 Δx+2 ˙ ˙ 5 + m2 L2 Δx (Θ4 + 2 Θ5 ) = 0 . Θ4 + 2 Θ 6 6

The overdot stands for a time derivative. The system of equations can easily be solved with the aid of the Laplace transform. The back transformation, however, leads to an inﬁnite series for each of the temperatures. Its convergency is bad and the numerical eﬀort very elaborate. Hence it is preferable to solve the system of equations numerically, for example with the aid of Mathematica or MatLab without making use of the Laplace transform. Some temperatures thus obtained are given in Table C.2.

Table C.2: Results of 2.22 Θ (t) / ◦ C

x+ = 0 x+ = 0.2 x+ = 0.4 x+ = 0.6 x+ = 0.8 x+ = 1.0

t = 10 s 100 s 1000 s 1800 s = ˆ 1/2 h 3600 s = ˆ1h

20.17 65.11 173.70

9.93 53.78 162.38

4.08 45.16 153.75

1.33 39.09 147.69

0.31 35.49 144.09

1.0 34.30 142.89

179.19

167.87

159.24

153.18

149.58

148.38

179.62

168.29

159.67

153.60

150.00

148.81

179.82

168.50

159.87

153.81

150.20

149.02

Analyt. solution, steady state

690

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

The analytical solution of equation (2.51) for steady state heat conduction with the boundary condition: x = 0 : −λ ∂Θ/∂x = q˙ und x = L : ∂Θ/∂x = 0 is: Θ=

q˙ cosh [m L (1 − x+ )] . λm sinh (m L)

With q/λ ˙ m = 100.66 and m L = 0.6325 of example the temperatures listed in the last line of Table C.2 are obtained. As the table shows steady state heat conduction is reached after approximately half an hour. 2.23: We have 4 4 4 π2 9π 2 + 25π 2 + ξA (x = 0, t)−ξAS = exp − t+ exp − tD + exp − tD −. . .+. . . . D − ξAα −ξAS π 4 3π 4 5π 4 Using the ﬁrst term of the series we obtain t+ D = 1.039 and t = 14.1 days. The other series terms are negligibly small, which can be simply checked, so that it is actually suﬃcient to just use the ﬁrst series term. 2.24: The diﬀusion now occurs in the direction of the x- and y-coordinate. In the treatment of the corresponding heat conduction problem, section 2.3.5, has shown that for a block with side lengths 2X, 2Y , the temperature proﬁle is given by (2.191) ϑ − ϑS x at αX y at α Y + , , · ϑ . = ϑ+ , , ϑ+ = Pl Pl ϑ0 − ϑS X X2 λ Y Y2 λ For the diﬀusion problem, in the centre of the rod x = y = 0 and for βX/D = β Y /D → ∞ it correspondingly holds that ξA (x = y = 0) − ξAS Dt Dt + + ξA = = c+ · c . Pl Pl ξAα − ξAS X2 Y2 Under the assumption still to be checked, i.e. that the ﬁrst term of the series from the solution of the previous exercise is satisfactory, follows + = ξA

2 π2 4 exp − t+ . D π 4

Which gives t+ D = 0.569 and t = 7.7 days. It is easy to prove that the remaining series terms are actually negligible in comparison with the ﬁrst term. 2.25: a) We have M˙ La = 0.7 kg/s, M˙ Ga = 6.0 kg/s and M˙ W = 0.532 kg/s. b) The required time is obtained from (2.389). In which cAα = 0 and so L /ξA0 = 0.6 . cAm /cAS = ξAa

It then follows from (2.390) that 0.65797 =

∞ 1 . exp −i2 π 2 t+ D 2 i i=1

The solution is found by trial and error to be t+ D = 0.0485. The ﬁrst three terms of the series suﬃce. They give t = 72.7 s. c) L = tw = 7.27 m.

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

691

2.26: We can approximately say that BiD → ∞. In addition to this the surface of the spheres are immediately completely immersed in the water, ξA0 = 1. Therefore ˜ A = 55.5 kmol/m3 . cA0 = ξA0 /M Furthermore t+ D = 0.072. From (2.390) + c+ Am (tD ) =

∞ cAm − cA0 6 1 = 2 exp −i2 π 2 t+ D cAα − cA0 π i=1 i2

follows, with cAα = 0: cAm /cA0 = 0.6927 and cAm = 38.42 kmol/m3 . Each sphere takes in 0.241 g of water.

Chapter 3: Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂows 3.1: From −q˙j = λji ∂ϑ/∂xi follows, under consideration from λ12 = λ21 , −q˙1

=

−q˙2

=

−q˙3

=

∂ϑ ∂x1 ∂ϑ λ12 ∂x1 λ11

∂ϑ ∂x2 ∂ϑ + λ22 ∂x2 ∂ϑ λ33 . ∂x3 + λ12

In steady heat conduction, we generally have ∂ q˙j /∂xj = 0 as the plate is thin in the x2 -direction, then ∂ϑ/∂x2 = 0 and the diﬀerential equation for steady heat transfer looks like ∂2ϑ ∂2ϑ ∂ q˙2 ∂ q˙3 ∂ q˙1 + + = λ11 2 + λ33 2 = 0. ∂x1 ∂x2 ∂x3 ∂x1 ∂x3 3.2: For the model (index M) and the original (index O) it has to hold that N u = f (Re, P r) . a) It has to be P rM = P rO . With P rO = 4.5, the associated temperature is T = 311 K. b) We have (wM )1 = 0.0355 m/s and (wM )2 = 0.355 m/s. c) Because N uM = N uO or (αM dM ) /λM = (αO dO ) /λO , αO = 484 W/m2 K. 3.3: For the model (subscript M) and the original (subscript O), according to (3.327), it holds that N um ∼ Gr 1/4 with N um = αm L/λ and Gr = β∞ (Δϑ) g L3 /ν 2 . This then gives αmO = αmM and

LM L

1/4

ΔϑO ΔϑM

1/4 ,

7/4 5/4 Q˙ O αmO AO ΔϑO ΔϑO LO = = , αmM AM ΔϑM LM ΔϑM Q˙ M

because of AO /AM = L2O /L2M . We obtain Q˙ O = 469.5W.

692

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

3.4: Firstly, a dimension matrix is set up. L indicates the dimension of a length: L = dim L ; correspondingly t = dim t, T = dim ϑ, M = dim M . The dimension matrix looks like L L t M T

1 0 0 0

w0

λ

ν

c

αm

1 −1 0 0

−3 0 1 0

1 −3 1 −1

2 −1 0 0

2 −2 0 −1

0 −3 1 −1

Only the rank r of the matrix is determined, using equivalent transformations; these are linear combinations of rows (or columns). For this we form linear combinations of rows until the diagonal of a sub-matrix only contains ones, with the neighbouring diagonals all zeros. The ﬁrst row is indicated by Z1 , the second by Z2 and so on, forming a new matrix, the rows of which will be indicated by dashes. So Z4 = −Z4 , Z3 = Z3 + Z4 , Z2 = −Z2 + 3Z4 . The new matrix looks like L

w0

1 0 0 0

λ

−3 0 1 0

1 1 0 0

ν

1 0 0 1

c

2 1 0 0

αm

2 −1 −1 1

0 0 0 1

It already contains only ones in the front main diagonal. By a further transformation Z1 = Z1 − Z2 + 3Z3 − Z4 we get L 1 0 0 0

w0 0 1 0 0

λ

0 0 1 0

ν

0 0 0 1

1 1 0 0

c

αm

−1 −1 −1 1

−1 0 0 1

The left hand sub-matrix now contains, as demanded, only ones in the main diagonal, in the neighbouring diagonals only zeros. The rank of the matrix is r = 4, as there are four rows that are linearly independent of each other: By equivalent transformation no more rows can be converted into another. According to Buckingham [1.20], the number m of π-quantities m = n − r, where n is the number of original variables, in our case is n = 7. There are m= 7−4 = 3 π-quantities. These are yielded from the above matrix as ν −1 −0 −0 π1 = νL−1 wm λ = = 1/Re wm L c wm L 1 1 −1 λ = wm L = π2 = cL1 wm = ReP r λ a α L m 0 0 −1 λ = π3 = αm L1 wm = Nu λ We have f (π1 , π2 , π3 ) = 0 or f (N u, Re, P r) = 0. 3.5: a) The dimension matrix is d L t M

1 0 0

w

A

W

g

1 −1 0

−3 0 1

−3 0 1

1 −2 0

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

693

By equivalent transformations, new rows Zi are obtained from the original rows Zi (i = 1, 2, 3). The following equivalent transformation of the rows Z1 = Z1 + Z2 + 3Z3 , Z2 = −Z2 , Z3 = Z3 is carried out yielding d 1 0 0

w

A

W

0 1 0

0 0 1

0 0 1

g −1 2 0

The rank of the matrix is r = 3. This gives m = n − r = 5 − 3 = 2. The dimensionless quantities are W π1 = W d0 w 0 −1 L = L gd 1 −2 0 π2 = gd w L = 2 . w b) We have π2 = f (π1 ) or gd/w 2 = f (W /L ). 3.6: Introducing the velocity proﬁle in the integral condition that follows from (3.165) for the momentum ⎤ ⎡ 1 wx d ⎣ 2 wx y ⎦ νwδ ∂wx /∂wδ = wδ δ 1− d dx wδ wδ δ δ ∂y/δ y=0 0

yields, with the abbreviation z = π/2(y/δ): ⎤ ⎡ π/2 2 2 d ⎢ ⎥ νwδ π sin z(1 − sin z) dz ⎦ = w . ⎣δ π δ dx δ 2 0

The integral has the value 1 − π/4. With that, after integration 1/2 1/2 νx 2 δ=π = 4.795 x Rex−1/2 . 4−π wδ This result diﬀers from (3.170) by the fact that in place of the factor 4.64 in (3.170), the factor 4.795 appears. 3.7: In order to ascertain whether the ﬂow is turbulent, the Reynolds number is calculated at the end of the plate Re = w∞ L/ν. As the viscosity is only found at a pressure 0.1 MPa, we make use of η = ν = const for ϑ = const. It follows from this, that p1 /(RT1 )ν1 = p2 /(RT2 )ν2 or ν2 = ν1 p1 /p2 at ϑ = const. We have ν1 (p1 , ϑm) = 30.84 · 10−6 m2 /s with p1 = 0.1 MPa, and the mean temperature ϑm = (ϑ∞ + ϑ0 )/2 = (300 + 25)/2 ◦ C = 162.5 ◦ C. This then gives ν2 = 30.84 · 10−5 m2 /s and the associated Reynolds number as Re = 3.243 · 104 . The ﬂow is laminar to the end of the plate. The mean Nusselt number is, see also Example 3.8, N um = 105.5. This yields αm = 3.84 W/m2 K and q˙ = 1056 W/m2 . 3.8: The Reynolds number at the end of the lake is Re = 2.606 · 106 . This means that the ﬂow is initially laminar and becomes turbulent after a distance of xcr = 3.84 m. The Sherwood number is calculated from (3.208), in which the Nusselt number is replaced by the Sherwood number. We have Shm,lam = 904.1 and Shm,turb = 3592. This then gives + Shm = Sh2m,lam + Sh2m,turb = 3704, βm = 4.741 · 10−4 m/s m ˙ A = βm (ξA0 − ξA∞ ) = βm

1 1 (pA0 − pA∞ ) = βm (pA0 − ϕpA0 ) . RT RT

694

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

We also have pA0 = pWs and therefore pWs (1 − ϕ) = βm (1 − ϕ) , RT = 4.099 · 10−6 kg/m2 s

m ˙A

= βm

m ˙A M˙ A

= 147.5 kg/h .

3.9: M˙ = V˙ = 0.25 kg/s. Further, the energy balance holds Q˙ = M˙ cp (ϑe − ϑi ) = αm dπLΔϑm with Δϑm =

(ϑ0 − ϑi ) − (ϑ0 − ϑe ) = 57.71 ◦ C . ln [(ϑ0 − ϑi ) / (ϑ0 − ϑe )]

This yields αm =

M˙ cp (ϑe − ϑi ) = 769.3 W/m2 K . dπLΔϑm

3.10: The solar energy caught by the reﬂector is transferred to the absorber tube q˙S sL = q˙ do πL/2 . The heat ﬂux absorbed by the absorber tube is therefore q˙ = 1.567 · 104 W/m2 . It serves to heat the water: q˙ do πL/2 = M˙ cp (ϑe − ϑi ) with M˙ = wm d2i π/4 = 8.468 · 10−2 kg/s. L=

2 M˙ cp (ϑe − ϑi ) = 13.3 m . q˙ do π

The wall temperature ϑ0 at the outlet follows from q˙ = α (ϑ0 − ϑF ) = α (ϑ0 − ϑe ) as ϑ0 = q/α ˙ + ϑe = 139.4 ◦ C. 3.11: The heat losses are yielded from the energy balance as Q˙ = M˙ cp (ϑi − ϑe ) = 11.97 kW. The heat ﬂux transferred at the end of the tube is q˙ = k(ϑe − ϑ0 )

with

1 1 1 . = + k α αe

Here, α is the heat transfer coeﬃcient of the superheated steam on the inner tube wall. We set di ≈ do here. For the calculation of α, the Reynolds number has to be found ﬁrst Re =

wm d 4M˙ = = 7.47 · 105 . ν πdη

The ﬂow is turbulent. In addition L/d > 100. We obtain from (3.259) N um = 1143, αm = 1261 W/m2 K and q˙ = 1779 W/m2 . Furthermore, it holds that q˙ = αm (ϑe − ϑ0 ) and therefore ϑ0 = ϑe − q/α ˙ m = 118.6 ◦ C. 3.12: The speciﬁc surface area of the particle from (3.266) is aP = 6(1 − ε)/d = 180 m2 /m3 . The arrangement factor from (3.268) is fε = 1.9, the Reynolds number Re =

wm d = 6.135 · 103 . εν

The Nusselt number is calculated according to section 3.7.4, No. 5, from + N um = 2 + N u2m,lam + N u2m,turb

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

695

with N um,lam = 46.40 and N um,turb = 35.58 to be N um = 60.47. This yields αm = 80.73 W/m2 K. The total particle surface area is, according to (3.264), nAP = aP V = aP A0 H = 117 m2 . a) With that Q˙ = αm nAP (ϑA − ϑ0 ) = 177740 W ≈ 178 kW. b) The amount of water evaporated due to the heat fed is −2 ˙ kg/s M˙ W = Q/Δh v = 7.25 · 10

The amount of water evaporated due to the partial pressure drop p M˙ W = βm (XWS − X) RL T is around two orders of magnitude smaller, and can be neglected. This can be checked using the mass transfer coeﬃcients and speciﬁc humidity X = 0.622 pWS /(p/ϕ − pWS ) from section 3.7.4, No. 5. 3.13: The height Hmf of a ﬂuidised bed at the ﬂuidisation point follows from the condition of constant sand mass A0 Hmf (1 − εmf )S = A0 HS (1 − εS )S . It is

1 − εS HS = 0.57m . 1 − εmf The total pressure drop, according to (3.271), is Δp = [S (1 − εmf ) + G εmf ]gH ∼ = S (1 − εmf )gH. As (1 − εmf )H = const holds, the pressure drop in the ﬂuidised bed is practically constant, which can also be conﬁrmed by experiment. We can also put, for (1 − εmf )H at the ﬂuidisation point, (1−εS )H0 of the quiescent sand layer. With that, we get Δp ∼ = 7848 Pa. This pressure drop has to be summoned up by the blower. The pressure p2 at the blower outlet is equal to the pressure at the inlet of the ﬂuidised bed p2 = p1 +Δp = 107848 Pa. The mean pressure of the air in the ﬂuidised bed is mG = pm/RT = 0.322 kg/m3 . The ﬂuidisation velocity follows from (3.312). This includes the Archimedes number formed with the mean density mG Hmf =

S − mG d3P g = 419.7 . mG ν2

Ar =

According to (3.312) it is Remf = 0.310; and wmf = 0.094 m/s. The actual velocity is wm = 10wmf = 0.94 m/s. The mass ﬂow rate of the air at the inlet is p2 M˙ G = G wm A0 = wmA0 = 2.22 kg/s. RT The required blower power is P = M˙ G

κ RT1 κ − 1 ηV

p2 p1

κ−1 κ

− 1 = 20.4 kW.

It is

Prev M˙ cp (ϑ1 − ϑ1 ) = P P when ϑ1 is the ﬁnal temperature of the compression. It follows from this, that ϑ1 = 299.5K = 26.4 ◦ C. The heat ﬂow fed in is Q˙ = M˙ L cpmG (ϑ2 − ϑ1 ) = 2126 kW. ηV =

3.14: The density of the air over the ground is A1 =

p1 = 1.2084 kg/m3 , RA TA1

696

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

that of the waste gases is G1 =

p1 = 1.1946 kg/m3 . RG TG1

G1 < A1 ; the exhaust gases can rise. They would no longer rise if G1 ≥ A1 or TG1 ≤

RA = 438.1K = 164.9 ◦ C , RG TA1

if the exhaust gas temperature was to lie below 165 ◦ C. It holds for the air that dp = −g dx and so v dp = −g dx. With v = RA TA /p follows g dp =− dx . p RA TA Through integration the barometric height formula is obtained gΔx . p2 = p1 exp − RA TA The air pressure at 100m is p2 = 0.09882 MPa. The density of the air at 100 m height is A2 =

p2 = 1.194 kg/m3 . RA TA

The density of the exhaust gases at 100m follows from G2 =

p2 p1

1/κ G1 = 1.184 kg/m3 .

The exhaust gases are lighter than air at 100m height, they can rise further. 3.15: We have

β∞ (ϑ0 − ϑ∞ )gL3 = 4.23 · 109 ν2 and Ra = GrP r = 3.03 · 109 . Then, from (3.368) the mean Nusselt number for free ﬂow is found to be N umF = 173.2. Furthermore Gr =

Re =

w0 L = 5.80 · 104 . ν

Giving N um,lam = 142.4 and N um,turb = 203.3. The mean Nusselt number for forced convection is obtained as + N umC = N u2m,lam + N u2m,turb = 248.2 . As free and forced ﬂow are directed against each other, the minus sign in (3.374) holds, N um = 216.1 and αm = 5.92 W/m2 K. The two sides of the plate release the heat ﬂow Q˙ = αm A(ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) = 474 W. 3.16: In this section 3.9.3, p.423, No. 5 is used. We have Rax = Grx P r =

x 4 β∞ qgx ˙ 4 . P r = 7.11 · 1010 2 ν λ m

At the end of the plate x1 = 0.4 m, Rax1 = 1.82 · 109 . The ﬂow at the end of the plate is just about still laminar. It is N ux = 78.42

x 4/5 m

and

α = N ux

λ W = 1.968 x−1/5 9/5 . x m K

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

697

It further follows from q˙ = α(ϑ0 − ϑ∞ ) : ϑ0 =

q˙ W + ϑ∞ = 7.62 1/5 x1/5 + 283.15 K . α m

The wall temperature increases with x1/5 , and at the end of the plate x1 = 0.4 m is ϑ0 = 289.5 K = 16.3 ◦ C . 3.17: The cooling is determined by the heat transfer in free ﬂow. (3.368) holds for the vertical cylinder, for the horizontal cylinder, equation No. 3 in section 3.9.3, p.422. The Rayleigh number Raver for the vertical cylinder is formed with the cylinder height, that for the horizontal Rahor with the cylinder diameter. It is Raver =

β∞ (ϑo − ϑ∞ )gL3 P r = 8.45 · 106 ν2

and

Rahor = 5.41 · 105 .

From (3.368) N umver = 29.75 and αmver = N umver λ/L = 4.72 W/m2 K. From No. 3 in section 3.9.3, N umhor = 12.40 and αmhor = N umhor λ/d = 5.21 W/m2 K. This gives αmhor > αmver . In addition to this heat is also released via the ends of the horizontal cylinder. The can therefore cools more rapidly if it is lying down. 3.18: The temperature of the outer skin T0 is practically equal to the eigentemperature, as the heat ﬂux released from the outer skin, according to (3.409), is q˙ = α(T0 − Te ) = k (Ti − T0 ) with 1/k = 1/αi + δ/λ. It follows from this, that T0 − Te = k /α(Ti − T0 ). Here, Ti − T0 is a few K, and the external heat transfer coeﬃcient is α √k . Therefore, T0 ∼ = Te . The eigentemperature is calculated from (3.349) with wSδ = κRTδ = 299.5 m/s and Ma δ = wδ /wSδ = 0.649 to be κ−1 Ma 2δ = 241.95 K = −31.2 ◦ C . Te = T0 = Tδ 1 + 2 √ Approximately the same results are obtained from (3.351) with r = 3 P r P r(−50 ◦ C) = ◦ 0.727, cp = 1.007 kJ/kgK. We obtain T0 = 240 K = −33, 1 C. The heat ﬂux is q˙ = k(Ti − T0 ) = 170.7 W/m2 with δ 1 1 + = k αi λ

and

k = 3.33 W/m2 K .

3.19: As soon as the temperature T0 of the outer skin rises above an eigentemperature Te of 300 ◦ C cooling must occur. Therefore, T0 ≤ Te so that cooling is not necessary. According to (3.349) Te = 1.8 . Tδ We should have T0 ≤ Te = 1.8Tδ , that is Tδ ≥ T0 /1.8 = 45.3 ◦ C. As soon as the air temperature rises above 45.3 ◦ C cooling has to start.

Chapter 4: Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change 4.1: According to (4.15) αm,hor = 3538.9 W/m2 K. The temperature at the condensate surface, is yielded approximately from (4.35) as ϑI − 333.15 =

30W/m2 K · 2257.3kJ/kgK 0.101325 − pI)MPa ln ( . 3538.9W/m2 K · 1.93kJ/kgK 6.556 · 10−3 − 0.0948

698

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

Here, p − p1G = (1 − y1G )p = 0.0674 − 0.101325MPa = 6.556 · 10−3 MPa is set. αm,hor (ϑI ) is now to be determined according to (4.15) with the still unknown temperature ϑI at the interface. For the determination of ϑI from the equation above, ϑI is guessed ﬁrst, and then with the value pI(ϑI ) from the steam tables, the estimate is checked for its correctness. We ﬁnd ϑI ∼ = 350.8 K = 77.7 ◦ C, for this we get pI = 0.0397 MPa and the equation above is well satisﬁed. It follows from (4.36) that q˙G /q˙ = 0.44. The heat ﬂux released falls to 44 % of the heat ﬂux that would be released if pure, saturated steam was present. The area has to be increased by a factor of 1/0.44 = 2.27, if the condenser power is to stay the same. 4.2: We get Δϑ = ϑ0 − ϑs = 200 ◦ C, according to Fig. 4.40 this is in the region of ﬁlm boiling. The heat transfer coeﬃcients are yielded from section 4.2.8, No. 6 as αR = 25.1 W/m2 K and αmG = 231.1 W/m2 K. With that we get αmG /αR = 9.2 and αm /αmG = 1.088, αm = 708.8 W/m2 K. The heating power is Q˙ = αm AΔϑ = 396 W. 4.3: The heating power amounts to Q˙ = M˙ oil cpoil Δϑ = 3 MW. The amount of steam generated M˙ W follows from Q˙ = M˙ W Δhv as M˙ W = 1.38 kg/s = 4.95 · 103 kg/h. On the other hand, the heat ﬂow transferred is Q˙ = kAΔϑm

with

(ϑoil,i − ϑs ) − (ϑoil,e − ϑs ) . ln[(ϑoil,i − ϑs )/(ϑoil,e − ϑs )]

Δϑm =

It is Δϑm = 42.84 K and from 1/(kA) = 1/(αi Ai ) + 1/(αo Ao ) with A = Ao ∼ = Ai follows 1/k = 1/αi + 1/αo . According to (4.99), αo = 2.43 q˙0.72 W/m2 K and so 1 1 1 = + m2 K/W . k 700 2.43 q˙0.72 This gives

−1 1 1 Q˙ W/m2 K · 42.84 K . = q˙ = kΔϑm = + A 700 2.43 q˙ 0.72

This leads to a transcendental equation for q: ˙ 3.3347 · 10−5 q˙ + 9.606 · 10−3 q˙0.28 − 1 = 0 . ˙ as A ∼ The solution is q˙ = 25076 W/m2 . The transfer area is follows from Q˙ = qA = 120 m2 . 4.4: a) The length follows from the energy balance qdπΔz ˙ =m ˙

d2 π (h − h1 ) as 4

Δz =

md(h ˙ − h1 ) = 1.17 m . 4q˙

b) The quality at the outlet is yielded from (4.117) as x∗ = 0.387. 4.5: According to (4.152),

Xtt = 0.2259

1 − x∗ x∗

0.9 .

From (4.126) with (4.128) we get dp dp ˙2 1m 2 = −Φ2L = Φ2L ζL (1 − x∗ ) dz dz d 2 L L f dp 2 = −2061.6 N/m3 Φ2L (1 − x∗ ) . dz f With the values given above for Xtt , we get from (4.153) 0.9 1.8 20 1 x∗ x∗ Φ2L = 1 + + 2 = 1 + 88.53 + 19.596 Xtt Xtt 1 − x∗ 1 − x∗

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

and therefore

dp dz

dx∗

=

f

699

−2061 N/m3 (1 − x∗ )2 + 88.53 x∗ 0.9 (1 − x∗ )1.1 0.2 +19.596 x∗ 1.8 (1 − x∗ ) dx∗ .

As the heating is with constant heat ﬂux, the ﬂow quality x∗ changes linearly with the distance z. This follows from the energy balance x∗ =

q˙ · 4 ˙ (z − Δz) 1 qdπ = (z − Δz) . Δhv md ˙ 2 π/4 Δhv md ˙

With Δz = 1.17 m x∗ = 0.1575(z/m − 1.17). So dx∗ / dz = 0.1575 /m and in the previous equation for the pressure drop dp dx∗ = ( dp)f 0.1575/m . dz f It therefore holds that ( dp)f

2 1.1 = −13098 N/m2 (1 − x∗ ) + 88.53 x∗ 0.9 (1 − x∗ ) 0.2 1.8 dx∗ . +19.596 x∗ (1 − x∗ )

Integration between x∗ = 0 and x∗ = 0.387 yields (Δp)f = −823 hPa = −0.823 MPa. 4.6: a) The length is obtained from the energy balance qdπL ˙ + M˙ h1 qdπL ˙ md ˙ 2 π/4 L=

= M˙ G h + M˙ L h = x∗ h + (1 − x∗ ) h − h1

md ˙ [x∗ h + (1 − x∗ ) h − h1 ] = 3.25 m . 4q˙

˙ 2Ph . It is ϑs (5.95 MPa) = 275 ◦ C. b) The wall temperature is yielded from ϑ0 = ϑs + q/α The heat transfer coeﬃcient α2Ph follows from (4.159) with αL and αG from 3.8.6 No. 1. It is md ˙ md ˙ = 2.1 · 105 ; ReG = = 1.08 · 106 ReL = ηL ηG αL = 11023 W/m2 K ;

αG = 6241 W/m2 K

and α2Ph = 39258 W/m2 K, giving ϑ0 = 295.4 ◦ C.

Chapter 5: Thermal radiation 5.1: c = 197.2 · 106 m/s; λM = 1.97 μm; ePh = 6.622 · 10−20 J. 5.2: λ1 = 2.3 μm, λ2 = 4.7 μm; L = 115.2 W/(m2 sr); M = 361.9 W/m2 ; ΔM/M = 1/32. 5.3: ΔM/M = 1/4 5.4: Lref = 38.2 W/(m2 sr); Φb,abs /A = 680 W/m2 5.5: T = 1139 K 5.6: T = 1400 K; M = 218 kW/m2 5.7: T = 4330 K and T = 11810 K. There are two temperatures!

700

Appendix C: Solutions to the exercises

5.8: a) ε = 0.677; b) a = 0.375 5.9: 0.332 5.10: E = 6375 W/m2 ; ε = 0.864 5.11: T = 740 K; ε = 0.0964; εn = 0.0789 5.12: F11 = 0; F12 = 1; F21 = 0.6366; F22 = 0.3634 5.13: F12 = 0.5 5.14: F11 = 0; F12 = 0.8500; F13 = 0.1500; F21 = 0.3400; F22 = 0; F23 = 0.6600; F31 = 0.0833; F32 = 0.9167; F33 = 0. 5.15: T (0) = 507 K; T (h) = 439 K; T (2h) = 375 K; T (10h) = 305 K; T (∞) = 300 K. 5.16: T = 953 K 5.17: Q˙ = 436 W 5.18: a) The heat ﬂow is independent of the orientation of the radiation protection shield. b) If the side with the larger emissivity (2.5εS ) is directed towards the plate with T1 , the higher temperature TS is yielded. 5.19: a) TA = 679.6 K; TB = 576.1 K. b) q˙ = 4063 W/m2 . c) T1 = 576.1 K = TB from part a). 5.20: a) λeﬀ = 0.2545 W/K m; q˙ = 33.82 W/m2 . b) q˙ = 13.1 W/m2 5.21: α = 39.9 W/(m2 K); αrad = 23.8 W/(m2 K). The gas radiation participates by around 37 % in the heat transfer.

Literature

Chapter 1: Introduction. Technical Applications [1.1]

Baehr, H.D.: Thermodynamik, 14th ed., p. 68–69, Berlin: Springer 2009

[1.2]

Stephan, P; Schaber, K.H.; Stephan, K.; Mayinger, F.: Thermodynamik. Grundlagen und technische Anwendungen. Vol. 1, 18th ed., p. 74–75, Berlin: Springer 2009

[1.3]

Churchill, S.W.; Chu, H.H.S.: Correlating equations for laminar and turbulent free convection from a horizontal cylinder. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 18 (1975) 1049–1053

[1.4]

Krischer, O.; Kast, W.: W¨ arme¨ ubertragung und W¨armespannungen bei Rippenrohren. VDI-Forschungsheft 474. D¨ usseldorf: VDI-Verlag 1959

[1.5]

Sparrow, E.M.; Hennecke, D.H.: Temperature depression at the base of a ﬁn. J. Heat Transfer 92 (1970) 204–206

[1.6]

Sparrow, E.M.; Lee, L.: Eﬀects of ﬁn base-temperature in a multiﬁn array. J. Heat Transfer 96 (1975) 463–465

[1.7]

Hausen, H.: W¨ arme¨ ubertragung im Gegenstrom, Gleichstrom und Kreuzstrom. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer 1976, English version: Hausen, H.: Heat Transfer in Counterﬂow, Parallel Flow and Cross Flow, New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co., – translated from German by M.S Sayer, edited by A.J. Wilmott 1982

[1.8]

Martin, H.: W¨arme¨ ubertrager. Stuttgart: G. Thieme Verlag 1988

[1.9]

Roetzel, W.; Heggs, R.J.; Butterworth, D. (Eds.): Design and Operation of Heat Exchangers. Berlin: Springer 1992

¨ [1.10] Hausen, H.: Uber die Theorie des W¨ armeaustausches in Regeneratoren. Z. angew. Math. Mech. 9 (1929) 173–200; —: Vervollst¨ andigte Berechnung des W¨armeaustausches in Regeneratoren. VDI-Z. Beiheft Verfahrenstechnik“ (1942) Nr. 2, p. 31–43 ” [1.11] Hausen, H.; Bender, W.: Heat transfer in regenerators. Sect. N1; in: VDI-HeatAtlas, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2010 [1.12] Roetzel, W.; Spang, B.: Overall heat transfer. Sect. C2 in: VDI-HeatAtlas, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2010 [1.13] Ahrendts, J.; Baehr, H.D.: Die thermodynamischen Eigenschaften von Ammoniak. VDIForschungsheft 596, D¨ usseldorf: VDI-Verlag 1979 [1.14] Smith, D.M.: Mean temperature diﬀerence in cross ﬂow. Engng. 138 (1934) 479–481 and 606–607 [1.15] Schedwill, H.: Thermische Auslegung von Kreuzstromw¨armeaustauschern. Fortsch.-Ber. VDI. Series 6, No. 19. D¨ usseldorf: VDI-Verlag 1968 [1.16] Roetzel, W.; Spang, B.: Thermal design of heat exchangers. Sect. C1 in: VDI-HeatAtlas, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2010

702

Literature

[1.17] Nußelt, W.: Eine neue Formel f¨ ur den W¨ arme¨ ubergang im Kreuzstrom. Techn. Mech. u. Thermodynamik 1 (1930) 417–422 [1.18] Roetzel, W.; Spang, B.: Verbessertes Diagramm zur Berechnung von W¨arme¨ ubertragern. W¨arme- u. Stoﬀ¨ ubertragung 25 (1990) 259–264 ¨ ¨ [1.19] Stichlmair, J.: Anwendung der Ahnlichkeitsgesetze bei vollst¨andiger und partieller Ahnlichkeit. Chem.-Ing. Techn. 63 (1991) 38–51 ¨ [1.20] Pawlowski, J.: Die Ahnlichkeitstheorie in der physikalisch-technischen Forschung. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1971 [1.21] Haase, R.: Thermodynamik der irreversiblen Prozesse. Darmstadt: Steinkopﬀ Verlag 1963, English version: Haase, R.: Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes. Reading, Massachusetts, Addison-Wesley 1968 [1.22] de Groot, S. R.: Thermodynamics of irreversible processes. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1951 [1.23] Sherwood, Th.K.; Pigford, R.L.; Wilke, Ch.: Mass Transfer. New York: McGraw Hill, Kogakusha Ltd., 1975 [1.24] Perry, R. H.; Green, D. W.: Chemical Engineers Handbook. 7th ed. New York: McGraw Hill 1997 [1.25] Brauer, H.; Mewes, D.: Stoﬀaustausch einschließlich chemischer Reaktionen. Hanau: Verlag Sauerl¨ander 1971 [1.26] Mersmann, A.: Stoﬀ¨ ubertragung. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1986 [1.27] Lewis, W.K.; Whitman, W.G.: Principles of gas absorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. 116 (1924) 1215–1220 ¨ [1.28] Stefan, J.: Uber das Gleichgewicht und die Bewegung, insbesondere die Diﬀusion von Gasgemengen. Sitzungsb. Akad. Wiss. Wien 63 (1871) 63–124 [1.29] VDI-HeatAtlas, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2010 [1.30] Bird, R.B.; Stewart, W.E.; Lightfoot, E.N.: Transport Phenomena. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley 2002 [1.31] Higbie, R.: The rate of absorption of a pure gas into a still liquid during short periods of exposure. Trans. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. 31 (1935) 36–38 [1.32] Danckwerts, P.V.: Gas-Liquid-Reactions. New York: McGraw Hill 1970 [1.33] Stephan, P; Schaber, K.H.; Stephan, K.; Mayinger, F.: Thermodynamik: Grundlagen und technische Anwendungen. Vol. 2, 15th ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2009, p. 23

Chapter 2: Heat conduction and mass diﬀusion [2.1]

Carslaw, H.S.; Jaeger, J.C.: Conduction of heat in solids. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1986

[2.2]

Jakob, M.: Heat transfer. Vol. 1. New York: J. Wiley & Sons 1949

[2.3]

H¨ochel, J.; Saur, G.; Borchers, H.: Strukturver¨ anderungen in kurzzeitig behandeltem Urandioxyd mit und ohne Neutronenbestrahlung als Hilfe zur Ermittlung der Temperaturverteilung in Brennelementen f¨ ur Kernreaktoren. J. Nucl. Mat. 33 (1969) 225–241

[2.4]

Chen, S.-Y.; Zyskowski, G.L.: Steady-state heat conduction in a straight ﬁn with variable ﬁlm coeﬃcient. ASME-Paper No. 63-HT-12 (1963)

Literature

703

[2.5]

Han, L.S.; Lefkowitz, S.G.: Constant cross-section ﬁn eﬃciencies for nonuniform surface heat-transfer coeﬃcients. ASME-Paper No. 60-WA-41 (1960)

[2.6]

¨ Unal, H.C.: Determination of the temperature distribution in an extended surface with a non-uniform heat transfer coeﬃcient. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 28 (1985) 2279–2284

[2.7]

Harper, D.R.; Brown, W.B.: Mathematical equations for heat conduction in the ﬁns of air-cooles engines. Natl. Advisory Comm. Aeronautics, Report no. 158 (1922)

[2.8]

Schmidt, E.: Die W¨ arme¨ ubertragung durch Rippen. Z. VDI 70 (1926), p. 885–889, 947–1128 and 1504

[2.9]

Gardner, K.A.: Eﬃciency of extended surfaces. Trans. ASME 67 (1945) 621–631

[2.10] Focke, R.: Die Nadel als K¨ uhlelement. Forschung Ing.-Wes. 13 (1942) 34–42 [2.11] Kern, D.Q.; Kraus, A.D.: Extended surface heat transfer. New York: McGraw-Hill 1972 [2.12] Ullmann, A.; Kalman, H.: Eﬃciency and optimized dimensions of annular ﬁns of diﬀerent cross-section shapes. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 32 (1989) 1105–1110 [2.13] Brandt, F.: W¨ arme¨ ubertragung in Dampferzeugern und W¨armeaustauschern. Essen: Vulkan-Verlag 1985 [2.14] Schmidt, Th.E.: Die W¨ armeleistung von berippten Oberﬂ¨achen. Abh. Deutsch. K¨altetechn. Verein No. 4, Karlsruhe: C.F. M¨ uller 1950 [2.15] Sparrow, E.M.; Lin, S.H.: Heat-transfer characteristics of polygonal and plate ﬁns. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 7 (1964) 951–953 [2.16] Baehr, H.D.; Schubert, F.: Die Bestimmung des Wirkungsgrades quadratischer Scheibenrippen mit Hilfe eines elektrischen Analogieverfahrens. K¨altetechnik 11 (1959) 320–325 [2.17] Kaka¸c, S.; Yener, Y.: Heat conduction. 3rd ed. Washington: Hemisphere Publ. Comp. 2001 [2.18] Grigull, U.; Sandner, H.: Heat conduction. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1992 [2.19] Elgeti, K.: Der W¨ armeverlust eines in einer Wand verlegten Rohres. Heizung-L¨ uftungHaustechn. 22 (1971) 109–113 [2.20] Keune, F.; Burg, K.: Singularit¨ atenverfahren der Str¨omungslehre. Karlsruhe: Braun 1975 [2.21] Elgeti, K.: Der W¨ armeverlust einer erdverlegten Rohrleitung im station¨aren Zustand unter dem Einﬂuß der W¨ arme¨ ubertragungszahl an der Erdoberﬂ¨ache. Forsch. Ing.-Wes. 33 (1967) 101–105 [2.22] Nußelt, W.: Die Temperaturverteilung in der Decke einer Strahlungsheizung. Gesundh.Ing. 68 (1947) 97–98 [2.23] Hahne, E.; Grigull, U.: Formfaktor und Formwiderstand der station¨aren mehrdimensionalen W¨armeleitung. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 18 (1975) 751–767 [2.24] Hahne, E.: Steady state heat conduction. Sect. E1 in: VDI-HeatAtlas, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2010 [2.25] Baehr, H.D.: Die L¨ osung nichtstation¨ arer W¨ armeleitungsprobleme mit Hilfe der LaplaceTransformation. Forsch. Ing.-Wes. 21 (1955) 33–40 [2.26] Tautz, H.: W¨armeleitung und Temperaturausgleich. Weinheim: Verlag Chemie 1971 [2.27] Doetsch, G.: Anleitung zum praktischen Gebrauch der Laplace-Transformation und der Z-Transformation. 5th ed. M¨ unchen: R. Oldenbourg 1985

704

Literature

[2.28] Spanier, J.; Oldham, K.B.: An atlas of functions. Washington: Hemisphere Publ. Comp. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1987 [2.29] Chu, H.S.; Chen, C.K.; Weng, C.: Applications of Fourier series technique to transient heat transfer problems. Chem. Eng. Commun. 16 (1982) 215–225 [2.30] Jahnke-Emde-L¨ osch: Tafeln h¨ oherer Funktionen. 6th ed. Stuttgart: Teubner 1960, English version: Jahnke, Emde, and L¨ osch: Tables of Higher Functions. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. 1960 [2.31] Berlyand, O.S.; Gavrilovo, R.I.; Prudnikov, A.P.: Tables of integral error functions and Hermite polynomials. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1962 [2.32] Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, I.A.: Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs and mathematical tables. Washington: U.S. Gouvernment Printing Oﬀ. 1972 [2.33] J¨anich, K.: Analysis f¨ ur Physiker und Ingenieure. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1990 [2.34] Grigull, U.: Temperaturausgleich in einfachen K¨ orpern. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1964 [2.35] Schneider, P.J.: Temperature response charts. New York: J. Wiley & Sons 1963 [2.36] Grigull, U.; Bach, J.; Sandner, H.: N¨ aherungsl¨osungen der nichtstation¨aren W¨armeleitung. Forsch. Ing.-Wes. 32 (1966) 11–18 [2.37] Goldstein, S.: The application of Heaviside’s operational method to the solution of a problem in heat conduction. Z. angew. Math. Mech. 12 (1932) 234–243, and: On the calculation of the surface temperature of geometrically simple bodies. Z. angew. Math. Mech. 14 (1934) 158–162 [2.38] Baehr, H.D.: Die Berechnung der K¨ uhldauer bei ein- und mehrdimensionalem W¨armeﬂuß. K¨altetechnik 5 (1953) 255–259 ¨ [2.39] Stefan, J.: Uber die Theorie der Eisbildung, insbesondere u ¨ber die Eisbildung im Polarmeer. Wiedemann Ann. Phys. u. Chem. 42 (1891) 269–286 [2.40] Ockendon, J.R.; Hodgkins, W.R. (Eds.): Moving boundary problems in heat ﬂow and diﬀusion. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1975 [2.41] Wilson, D.G.; Solomon, A.D.; Boggs, P.T. (Eds.): Moving boundary problems. New York: Academic Press 1978 ¨ [2.42] Plank, R.: Uber die Gefrierzeit von Eis und wasserhaltigen Lebensmitteln. Z. ges. K¨alteindustrie 39 (1932) 56–58 [2.43] Nesselmann, K.: Systematik der Gleichungen f¨ ur Gefrieren und Schmelzen von Eisschichten nebst Anwendung auf Trommelgefrierapparate und S¨ ußwasserk¨ uhler. K¨altetechnik 1 (1949) 169–172 [2.44] Nesselmann, K.: Die Trennung ﬂ¨ ussiger Gemische durch k¨altetechnische Verfahren. Forsch. Ing.-Wes. 17 (1951) 33–39 [2.45] Goodman, T.R.: The heat balance integral and its application to problems involving a change of phase. J. Heat Transfer 80 (1958) 335–342 [2.46] Cho, S.H.; Sunderland, J.E.: Heat conduction problems with melting or freezing. J. Heat Transfer 91 (1969) 421–426 [2.47] Charach, Ch.; Zoglin, P.: Solidiﬁcation in a ﬁnite, initially overheated slab. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 28 (1985) 2261–2268 [2.48] Megerlin, F.: Geometrisch eindimensionale W¨ armeleitung beim Schmelzen und Erstarren. Forsch. Ing.-Wes. 34 (1968) 40–46

Literature

705

[2.49] Stephan, K.: Schmelzen und Erstarren geometrisch einfacher K¨orper. K¨altetechnik–Klimatisierung 23 (1971) 42–46 [2.50] Stephan, K.; Holzknecht, B.: Die asymptotischen L¨osungen f¨ ur Vorg¨ange des Erstarrens. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 19 (1976) 597–602 [2.51] Stephan, K.; Holzknecht, B.: W¨ armeleitung beim Erstarren geometrisch einfacher K¨orper. W¨arme- u. Stoﬀ¨ ubertragung 7 (1974) 200–207 [2.53] Incropera, F.P.; De Witt, D.P.: Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. 5th ed. New York: J. Wiley & Sons 2002 [2.54] Lick, W.J.: Diﬀerence equations from diﬀerential equations. Lecture notes in engineering; No. 41. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1989, English version: Bathe, K.-J.: Finite Element Procedures. Englewood Cliﬀs, New Jeresy: Prentice Hall 1996 [2.55] Forsythe, G.E.; Wasow, W.R.: Finite-diﬀerence methods for partial diﬀerential equations. New York: J. Wiley & Sons 1960 ¨ [2.56] Binder, L.: Uber außere W¨ armeleitung und Erw¨armung elektrischer Maschinen. Diss. ¨ TH M¨ unchen 1910 ¨ [2.57] Schmidt, E.: Uber die Anwendung der Diﬀerenzenrechnung auf technische Aufheiz- und Abk¨ uhlprobleme. Beitr¨ age zur techn. Mechanik u. techn. Physik (F¨oppl-Festschrift). Berlin 1924 [2.58] Schmidt, E.: Das Diﬀerenzenverfahren zur L¨ osung von Diﬀerentialgleichungen der nichtstation¨aren W¨armeleitung, Diﬀusion und Impulsausbreitung. Forsch. Ing.-Wes. 13 (1942) 177–185 [2.59] Baehr, H.D.: Beitr¨ age zur graphischen Bestimmung nichtstation¨arer Temperaturfelder mit Hilfe des Diﬀerenzenverfahrens. Forsch. Ing.-Wes. 20 (1954) 16–19 [2.60] Crank, J.; Nicolson, P.: A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial diﬀerential equations of the heat conduction type. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 43 (1947) 50–67 [2.61] T¨ornig, W.; Spelluci, P.: Numerische Mathematik f¨ ur Ingenieure und Physiker. 2nd ed., 2 Vols., Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1988 and 1990 [2.62] Stoer, J.; Bulirsch, R.: Numerische Mathematik 1. 9. Auﬂ. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2005, English version: Stoer, J.; Bulirsch, R.: Introduction to Numerical Analysis, 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag 2002 [2.63] Stoer, J.; Bulirsch, R.: Numerische Mathematik 2. 5th ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2005, English version: Stoer, J.; Bulirsch, R.: Introduction to Numerical Analysis, 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag 2002 [2.64] Peaceman, P.W.; Rachford, H.H.: The numerical solution of parabolic and elliptic differential equations. J. Soc. Industr. Appl. Math. 3 (1955) 28–41 [2.65] Douglas, J.: On the numerical integration of ∂ 2 u/∂x2 + ∂ 2 u/∂y 2 = ∂u/∂t by implicit methods. J. Soc. Industr. Appl. Math. 3 (1955) 42–65 [2.66] Douglas, J.; Rachford, H.H.: On the numerical solution of heat conduction problems in two and three space variables. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 82 (1956) 421–439 [2.67] Douglas, J.: Alternating direction methods for three space variables. Numer. Math. 4 (1962) 41–63 [2.68] Young, D.M.: Iterative solution of large linear systems. New York: Academic Press 1971,

706

Literature

[2.69] Stupperich, F.R.: Instation¨ are W¨ armeleitung. Vereinfachte Berechnung der Aufheizung bzw. Abk¨ uhlung von K¨ orpern in konstanter Umgebung. Brennst.-W¨arme-Kraft 45 (1993) 247–258 [2.70] Lewis, R.W.; Morgan, K.; Thomas, H.R.; Seetharma, K.N.: The ﬁnite element method in heat transfer analysis. New York: J. Wiley & Sons 1996 [2.71] Reddy, K.-J.; Gartling, D.K.: The ﬁnite element method in heat transfer and ﬂuid dynamics. 2nd ed.: CRC Press LLC 2001 [2.72] Marsal, D.: Finite Diﬀerenzen und Elemente. Numerische L¨osung von Variationsproblemen und partiellen Diﬀerentialgleichungen. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1989 [2.73] Bathe, K.-J.: Finite-Elemente-Methoden. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2002 [2.74] Knothe, K.; Wessels, H.: Finite Elemente. Eine Einf¨ uhrung f¨ ur Ingenieure. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1999 [2.75] Haase, R.: Thermodynamik der irreversiblen Prozesse. Darmstadt: Steinkopﬀ 1963, p. 300, English version: Haase, R.: Thermodynamics of irreversible processes. Reading, Massachusetts, Addison-Welsey 1968 [2.76] Wilke, C.R.; Chang, P.C.: Correlation of diﬀusion coeﬃcients in dilute solutions. Amer. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 1 (1955) 264–270 ¨ [2.77] Fick, A.: Uber Diﬀusion. Poggendorﬀs Ann. Phys. Chemie 94 (1855) 59–86, English version: Fick, A.: On Liquid Diﬀusion. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, Series 4, Vol. 10, No. 58, p. 30-39, 1855 [2.78] Crank, J.: The mathematics of diﬀusion. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1975, reprint 2004 [2.79] Landolt-B¨ornstein: Zahlenwerte und Funktionen aus Physik, Chemie, Astronomie, Geophysik und Technik. Vol. II, Part 2b. 6th ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1962 [2.80] Krischer, O.; Kast, W.: Die wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen der Trocknungstechnik. Vol. 1. 3rd. ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1978 [2.81] Aris, R.: On shape factors for irregular particles. Chem. Eng. Sci. 6 (1957) 262–268 [2.82] Kohlrausch, F.: Praktische Physik. 23rd ed., edited by D. Hahn a. S. Wagner, Vol. 1. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner 1985

Chapter 3: Convective heat and mass transfer. Single phase ﬂows [3.1]

Stephan, K.; Mayinger, F.: Thermodynamik. Grundlagen und technische Anwendungen. Vol. 2. 14th ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1999

[3.2]

Stephan, P.; Schaber, K.H.; Stephan, K.; Mayinger, F.: Thermodynamik. Grundlagen und technische Anwendungen. Vol. 1. 18th ed., Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2009

[3.3]

Haase, R.: Thermodynamik der irreversiblen Prozesse. Darmstadt: Steinkopﬀ 1963, English version: Haase, R.: Thermodynamics of irreversible processes. Reading, Massachusetts, Addison-Welsey 1968

[3.4]

¨ Prandtl, L.: Uber Fl¨ ussigkeitsbewegung bei sehr kleiner Reibung. Verhandlungen der 3. Intern. Math. Kongr., Heidelberg 1904, English version: Prandtl, L.: Motion of Fluids with Very Little Viscosity. NACA-TM-452 - translated by D.M. Miner. Washington, D.C., 1928

Literature

707

[3.5]

¨ Tollmien, W.: Uber die Entstehung der Turbulenz. 1. Mitteilung. Nachr. Ges. Wiss. G¨ottingen, Math. Phys. Klasse 21–24 (1929), English version: Tollmien, W.: The Production of Turbulence. NACA-TM-609 - translated by D.M. Miner, Washington, D.C. 1931

[3.6]

Blasius, H.: Grenzschichten in Fl¨ ussigkeiten mit kleiner Reibung. Z. Math. u. Phys. 56 (1908) 1–37, English version: Blasius, H.: The Boundary Layers in Fluids with Little Friction. NACA-TM-1256 - translated by J. Vanier. Washington, D.C., February 1950

[3.7]

T¨opfer, C.: Bemerkungen zu dem Aufsatz von H. Blasius, Grenzschichten in Fl¨ ussig” keiten mit kleiner Reibung“. Z. Math. u. Phys. 60 (1912) 197–398

[3.8]

Howarth, L.: On the solution of the laminar boundary layer equations. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 164 (1938) 547–579

[3.9]

Schlichting, H.: Grenzschicht-Theorie. 8th ed. Karlsruhe: G. Braun 1982, p. 592, English version: Schlichting, H.: Boundary-Layer Theory. 7th ed., New York, McGraw-Hill Book, Co., 1979. – translated by J. Kestin

[3.10] Colburn, A.P.: A method of correlating forced convection, heat transfer data and a comparison with ﬂuid friction. Trans. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. 29 (1933) 174–210 [3.11] Chilton, T.H.; Colburn, A.P.: Mass transfer (absorption) coeﬃcients. Ind. Eng. Chem. 26 (1934) 1138–1187 [3.12] Petukhov, B.J.; Popov, N.V.: Theoretical calculation of heat exchange and frictional resistance in turbulent ﬂow in tubes of an incompressible ﬂuid with variable physical properties. High Temperature 1 (1963) 69–83 [3.13] Gnielinski, V.: Berechung mittlerer W¨ arme- und Stoﬀ¨ ubergangskoeﬃzienten an laminar und turbulent u omten Einzelk¨ orpern mit Hilfe einer einheitlichen Gleichung. ¨berstr¨ Forsch. Ing. Wes. 41 (1975) 145–153 [3.14] Giedt, W.H.: Investigation of variation of point-unit heat transfer coeﬃcient around a cylinder normal to an air stream. Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. 71 (1949) 375–381 ˇ ˇ zda J.: Heat transfer of a cylinder in cross ﬂow. Washington: [3.15] Zukauskas, A.A.; Zingˇ Hemisphere Publ. Comp. 1986, p. 162 [3.16] Sparrow, E.M.; Abraham, J.P.; Tong, J.C.K.: Archival correlations for average heat transfer coeﬃcients for non-circular and circular cylinders and for spheres in cross ﬂow. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 47 (2004) 5285–5296 [3.17] Hofmann, E.: W¨ arme- und Stoﬀ¨ ubertragung. In: Planck, R. (Ed.): Handbuch der K¨altetechnik. Vol. 3. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1959 [3.18] Gnielinski, V.: Heat transfer in cross-ﬂow around single rows of tubes and through bundles. Sect. G7 in: VDI-HeatAtlas, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2010 [3.19] Hirschberg, H.G.: W¨ arme¨ ubergang und Druckverlust an quer angestr¨omte Rohrb¨ undeln. Abh. Dtsch. K¨altetech. Ver., No. 16. Karlsruhe: C.F. M¨ uller 1961 [3.20] Hausen, H.: Gleichungen zur Berechnung des W¨ arme¨ ubergangs im Kreuzstrom an Rohrb¨ undeln. K¨altetech. Klim. 23 (1971) 86–89 [3.21] Grimison, E.D.: Correlation and utilization of new data on ﬂow resistance and heat transfer for crossﬂow of gases over tube banks. Trans. Amer. Soc. Mech. Eng. 59 (1937) 583–594 [3.22] Slipˇcevi´c, B.: W¨ arme¨ ubertragung durch Leitung und Konvektion. In: Steimle, F.; Stephan, K. (Eds.): Handbuch der K¨ altetechnik. Vol. VI B. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1988, p. 61–62

708

Literature

[3.23] Stephan, K.: W¨ arme¨ ubergang und Druckabfall laminarer Str¨omungen im Einlauf von Rohren und ebenen Spalten. Diss. T.H. Karlsruhe 1959 [3.24] Kays, W.M.; Crawford, M.E.: Convective heat and mass transfer. New York: McGraw Hill 1980 [3.25] Kakaˇc, S.; Shah, R.K.; Aung, W.: Handbook of single-phase convective heat transfer. New York: John Wiley 1987, p. 3.122–3.125 ¨ [3.26] Graetz, L.: Uber die W¨ armeleitf¨ ahigkeit von Fl¨ ussigkeiten. Ann. Phys. Neue Folge 18 (1883) 79–94 und 25 (1885) 337–357 [3.27] Nußelt, W.: Die Abh¨ angigkeit der W¨ arme¨ ubergangszahl von der Rohrl¨ange. Z. Ver. Dtsch. Ing. 54 (1910) 1154–1158 [3.28] Brown, G.M.: Heat or mass transfer in a ﬂuid in laminar ﬂow in a circular duct or ﬂat conduit. Amer. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 6 (1960) 179–183 [3.29] Stephan, K.; Stephan, P.: Thermodynamik. In: Dubbel, Handbook of Mechanical Engineers. 20th ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2001 [3.30] L´evˆeque M.A.: Les lois de transmission de la chaleur par convection. Ann. des Mines 12 (1928) 201–299, 305–362, 381–415 [3.31] Shah, R.K.; London, A.L.: Laminar ﬂow forced convection in ducts. Suppl. 1 to Advances in Heat Transfer. New York: Academic Press 1978 [3.32] Schlichting, H.: Grenzschicht-Theorie. 8th ed. Karlsruhe: G. Braun 1982, p. 567, English version: Schlichting, H.: Boundary-Layer Theory. 7th ed., New York, McGraw-Hill Book, Co., 1979. – translated by J. Kestin [3.33] Kraussold, H.: Die W¨ arme¨ ubertragung bei z¨ ahen Fl¨ ussigkeiten in Rohren. VDI-Forschungsheft Nr. 351 (1931) [3.34] McAdams, W.H.: Heat transmission. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill 1954, p. 168 [3.35] Hufschmidt, W.; Burck, E.: Der Einﬂuß temperaturabh¨angiger Stoﬀwerte auf den W¨arme¨ ubergang bei turbulenter Str¨ omung von Fl¨ ussigkeiten in Rohren bei hohen W¨armestromdichten und Prandtlzahlen. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 41 (1968) 1041–1048 [3.36] Sieder, E.N.; Tate, G.E.: Heat transfer and pressure drop of liquids in tubes. Ind. Eng. Chem. 28 (1936) 1429–1436 [3.37] Petukhov, B.S.; Kirilov, V.V.: The problem of heat exchange in the turbulent ﬂow of liquids in tubes. Teploenergetika 4 (1968) 63–68 [3.38] Gnielinski, V.: New equations for heat and mass transfer in turbulent pipe and channel ﬂow. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 16 (1976) 359–368 [3.39] Gillespie, B.M.; Crandall, E.D.; Carberry, J.J.: Local and average interphase heat transfer coeﬃcients in a randomly packed bed of spheres. Amer. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 14 (1968) 483–490 [3.40] Schl¨ under, E.U.; Martin, H.: Einf¨ uhrung in die W¨arme- und Stoﬀ¨ ubertragung. Braunschweig: Vieweg 1995, p. 149 [3.41] Darcy, H.: Les fontaines publiques de la ville de Dijon. Paris: Victor Dalmont 1856 [3.42] Bear, J.: Hydraulics of groundwater. New York: McGraw Hill Publ. 1979 [3.43] Freeze, R.A., Cherry, J.A.: Groundwater. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. 1979 [3.44] Sanders, L.L.: A manual of ﬁeld hydrogeology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. 1998

Literature

709

[3.45] Scheidegger, A.E.: The physics of ﬂow through porous media. University of Toronto Press 1974 [3.46] Ergun, S.: Fluid ﬂow through packed columns. Chem. Eng. Progr. 48, No. 2 (1952) 89–94 [3.47] Ward, J.C.: Turbulent ﬂow in porous media. J. Hydraul. Div., Amer. Soc. Civil Engrs. 90, No. HY5 (1964) 1–12 [3.48] Beavers, G.S.; Sparrow, E.M.; Rodenz, D.E.: Inﬂuence of bed size on the ﬂow characteristics and porosity of randomly packed beds of spheres. J. Appl. Mech. 40 (1973) 655–660 [3.49] Nield, D.A.; Bejan, A.: Convection in porous media. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2006 [3.50] Bejan, A.: Convection heat transfer. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons 2004 [3.51] Wirth, K.E.: Flow patterns and pressure drop in ﬂuidized beds. Sect. L3.2 in: VDIHeatAtlas, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2010 [3.52] Ihme, H.; Schmidt-Traub, H.; Brauer, H.: Theoretische Untersuchung u ¨ber die Umstr¨omung und den Stoﬀ¨ ubergang an Kugeln. Chem. Ing. Techn. 44 (1972) 306–319 [3.53] Martin, H.: W¨arme¨ ubergang in Wirbelschichten. Chem. Ing. Techn. 52 (1980) 199–209, see also: Heat transfer in ﬂuidized beds. Sect. M5 in: VDI-HeatAtlas, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2010 [3.54] Reh, L.: Verbrennung in der Wirbelschicht. Chem. Ing. Techn. 40 (1968) 509–515 ¨ [3.55] Oberbeck, A.: Uber die W¨ armeleitung der Fl¨ ussigkeiten bei Ber¨ ucksichtigung der Str¨omung infolge von Temperaturdiﬀerenzen. Ann. Phys. Chem. 7 (1879) 271–292 [3.56] Boussinesq, J.M.: Th´eorie analytique de la chaleur. 2nd ed. Paris: Gauthier-Villars 1903 [3.57] Ostrach, S.: An analysis of laminar free convection ﬂow and heat transfer about a ﬂat plate parallel to the direction of the generating body force. NACA, Techn. Report 1111 (1953) [3.58] Pohlhausen, E.: Der W¨ armeaustausch zwischen festen K¨orpern und Fl¨ ussigkeiten mit kleiner Reibung. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 1 (1921) 115–121 [3.59] Le F`evre, E.J.: Laminar free convection from a vertical plane surface. Proc. 9th Int. Congr. Appl. Mech., Br¨ ussel, 4 (1956) paper I-168 [3.60] Churchill, S.W.; Chu, H.H.S.: Correlating equations for laminar and turbulent free convection from a vertical plate. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 18 (1975) 1049–1053 and 1323–1329 [3.61] Saville D.A.; Churchill, W.S.: Simultaneous heat and mass transfer in free convection boundary layers. Amer. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 16 (1970) 268–273 [3.62] Eckert, E.R.G.; Drake, M.: Analysis of heat and mass transfer. New York: McGraw Hill 1972, p. 421 [3.63] Eckert, E.R.G.: Engineering relations for heat transfer and friction in high-velocity laminar and turbulent boundary-layer ﬂow over surfaces with constant pressure and temperature. Trans. Amer. Soc. Mech. Eng., J. Heat Transfer 78 (1956) 1273–1283

Chapter 4: Convective heat and mass transfer. Flows with phase change

710

Literature

[4.1]

Butterworth, C.: Condensers: Basic heat transfer and ﬂuid ﬂow. In: Kaka¸c, S.; Bergles, A.E.; Mayinger, F.: Heat exchangers: Thermal-hydraulic fundamentals and design. Washington: Hemisphere 1981, 289–313

[4.2]

Nußelt, W.: Die Oberﬂ¨ achenkondensation des Wasserdampfes. VDI-Z. 60 (1916) 541– 546, 569–575, English version: Nusselt, W.: The Condensation of Steam on Cooled Surfaces, Chemical Engineering Fundamentals, Vol. 1, No. 2, p. 6-19, 1982 - translated by D. Fullarton

[4.3]

Chen, M.M.: An analytical study of laminar ﬁlm condensation. Part 1. Flat plates. Part 2. Single and multiple horizontal tubes. Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. C. J. Heat Transfer 83 (1961) 48–60

[4.4]

Dukler, H.E.; Bergelin, O.P.: Characteristics of ﬂow in falling liquid ﬁlms. Chem. Eng. Progr. 48 (1952) 557–563

[4.5]

¨ Kirschbaum, E.: Neues zum W¨ arme¨ ubergang mit und ohne Anderung des Aggregatzustandes. Chem. Ing. Tech. 24 (1952) 393–402

[4.6]

Brauer, H.: Str¨ omung und W¨ arme¨ ubergang bei Rieselﬁlmen. VDI-Forschungsheft 457, D¨ usseldorf: VDI-Verlag 1956

[4.7]

Grimley, L.S.: Liquid ﬂow conditions in packed towers. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. (London) 23 (1945) 228–235

[4.8]

Van der Walt, J.; Kr¨ oger, D.G.: Heat transfer resistances during ﬁlm condensation. Proc. Vth Int. Heat Transfer Conf., Tokyo 3 (1974) 284–288

[4.9]

Voskresenskij, K.D.: Heat transfer in ﬁlm condensation with temperature dependent properties of the condensate (in russian). Izv. Akad. Nauk USSR (1948) 1023–1028

[4.10] Rohsenow, W.M.: Heat transfer and temperature distribution in laminar ﬁlm condensation. Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. C. J. Heat Transfer 78 (1956) 1645–1648 [4.11] Ackermann, G.: W¨ arme¨ ubergang und molekulare Stoﬀ¨ ubertragung im gleichen Feld bei großen Temperatur- und Partialdruckdiﬀerenzen. VDI-Forschungsheft 382, Berlin: VDIVerlag 1937, 1–16 [4.12] Stephan, K.; Laesecke, A.: The inﬂuence of suction in condensation of mixed vapors. W¨arme- und Stoﬀ¨ ubertragung 13 (1980) 115–123 [4.13] Sparrow, E.M.; Minkowycz, W.J.; Saddy, M.: Forced convection condensation in the presence of noncondensables and interfacial resistance. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 10 (1967) 1829–1845 [4.14] Grigull, U.: W¨ arme¨ ubergang bei der Kondensation mit turbulenter Wasserhaut. Forsch. Ing.-Wes. 13 (1942) 49–57 und VDI Z. 86 (1942) 444–445 [4.15] Mostoﬁzadeh, Ch.; Stephan, K.: Str¨ omung und W¨arme¨ ubergang bei der Oberﬂ¨achenverdampfung und Filmkondensation. W¨ arme- und Stoﬀ¨ ubertragung 15 (1981) 93–115 [4.16] Henstock, W.H.; Hanratty, Th.J.: The interfacial drag and the height of the wall layer in annular ﬂows. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 6 (1976) 990–1000 [4.17] Isashenko, V.P.: Heat transfer in condensation (in russian). Moskau: Energia 1977 [4.18] Labunzov, D.A.: Heat transfer in ﬁlm condensation of pure vapors on vertical walls and horizontal tubes (in russian). Teploenergetika 7 (1957) 72–79 [4.19] Rohsenow, W.M.; Webber, J.H.; Ling, A.T.: Eﬀect of vapor velocity on laminar and turbulent ﬁlm condensation. Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. C. J. Heat Transfer 78 (1956) 1637–1643

Literature

711

[4.20] Dukler, A.E.: Fluid mechanics and heat transfer in vertical falling ﬁlm systems. Chem. Eng. Prog. Symp. Ser. 56 (1960) 1–10 [4.21] Shah, M.M.: A general correlation for heat transfer during ﬁlm condensation inside pipes. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 22 (1979) 547–556 [4.22] Watson, R.G.H.; Birt, D.C.P.; Honour, G.W.: The promotion of dropwise condensation by Montan wax. Part I. Heat transfer measurements. J. Appl. Chem. 12 (1962) 539–552 [4.23] Woodruﬀ, D.W.; Westwater, J.W.: Steam condensation on electroplated gold: Eﬀect of plating thickness. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 22 (1979) 629–632 [4.24] Krischer, S.; Grigull, U.: Mikroskopische Untersuchung der Tropfenkondensation. W¨arme- und Stoﬀ¨ ubertragung 4 (1971) 48–59 ¨ [4.25] Hampson, H.; Ozisik, N.: An investigation into the condensation of steam. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 1, Ser. B, (1952) 282–293 [4.26] Wenzel, H.: Versuche u ¨ber Tropfenkondensation. Allg. W¨armetech. 8 (1957) 53–39 [4.27] Welch, J.F.; Westwater, J.W.: Microscopic study of dropwise condensation. Int. Dev. Heat Transfer 2 (1961) 302–309 [4.28] Kast, W.: Theoretische und experimentelle Untersuchung der W¨arme¨ ubertragung bei Tropfenkondensation. Fortschrittsber. VDI-Z., Series 3, No. 6. D¨ usseldorf 1965 [4.29] Le F`evre, E.J.; Rose, J.W.: An experimental study of heat transfer by dropwise condensation. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 8 (1965) 1117–1133 [4.30] Tanner, D.W.; Pope, D.; Potter, C.J.; West, D.: Heat transfer in dropwise condensation at low pressures in the absence and presence of non-condensable gas. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 11 (1968) 181–190 [4.31] Griﬃth, P.; Lee, M.S.: The eﬀect of surface thermal properties and ﬁnish on dropwise condensation. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 10 (1967) 697–707 [4.32] Brown, A.R.; Thomas, M.A.: Filmwise and dropwise condensation of steam at low pressures. Proc. 3rd Int. Heat Transfer Conf., Chicago 1966, Vol. II, 300–305 [4.33] Eucken, A.: Energie- und Stoﬀaustausch an Grenzﬂ¨achen. (1937) 209–218

Naturwissenschaften 25

[4.34] Wicke, E.: Einige Probleme des Stoﬀ- und W¨ armeaustausches an Grenzﬂ¨achen. Chem. Ing. Tech. 23 (1951) 5–12 [4.35] Kast, W.: W¨arme¨ ubergang bei Tropfenkondensation. Chem. Ing. Tech. 35 (1963) 163– 168 [4.36] Jakob, M.: Heat transfer. Vol. I. New York: Wiley 1949, p. 694 [4.37] Umur, A.; Griﬃth, P.: Mechanism of dropwise condensation. Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. C. J. Heat Transfer 87 (1965) 275–282 [4.38] McCormick, J.L.; Baer, E.: On the mechanism of heat transfer in dropwise condensation. J. Colloid Sci. 18 (1963) 208–216 [4.39] Claude, G.: Air liquide, oxyg`ene, azote, rare gases. 2nd ed. Paris: Dunod 1926 [4.40] Lucas, K.: Die laminare Filmkondensation bin¨ arer Dampfgemische. Habil.-Thesis. RuhrUniv. Bochum 1974 [4.41] Tamir, A.; Taitel, Y.; Schl¨ under, E.U.: Direct contact condensation of binary mixtures. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 17 (1974) 1253–1260

712

Literature

[4.42] Pr¨ uger, W.: Die Verdampfungsgeschwindigkeit von Fl¨ ussigkeiten. Z. Phys. 115 (1949) 202–244 [4.43] Jakob, M.; Fritz, W.: Versuche u ¨ber den Verdampfungsvorgang. Forsch. Ing-Wes. 2 (1931) 435–447 [4.44] Jakob, M.: Kondensation und Verdampfung. VDI Z. 76 (1931) 1161–1170 [4.45] Jakob, M.; Linke, W.: Der W¨ arme¨ ubergang von einer waagerechten Platte an siedendes Wasser. Forsch. Ing.-Wes. 4 (1933) 75–81 [4.46] Jakob, M.; Linke, W.: Der W¨ arme¨ ubergang beim Verdampfen von Fl¨ ussigkeiten an senkrechten und waagerechten Fl¨ achen. Phys. Z. 36 (1935) 267–280 [4.47] Jakob, M.: Heat transfer in evaporation and condensation. Mech. Eng. 58 (1936) 643– 660, 729–739 [4.48] Fritz, W.: W¨arme¨ ubergang an siedende Fl¨ ussigkeiten. VDI Z. Beihefte Verfahrenstech. 5 (1937) 149–155 [4.49] Fritz, W.: Verdampfen und Kondensieren. VDI Z. Beihefte Verfahrenstech. 1 (1943) 1–14 [4.50] Stephan, K.: W¨ arme¨ ubergang beim Kondensieren und beim Sieden. Berlin: SpringerVerlag 1988, p. 125–126, English version: Stephan, K.: Heat Transfer in Condensation and Boiling: Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1992. [4.51] Stephan, P., Hammer, J.: A new model for nucleate boiling heat transfer. J. Heat Mass Transfer 30 (1992) 119–125 [4.52] Mann, M.; Stephan, K.: Inﬂuence of heat conduction in the wall on nucleate boiling heat transfer. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 43 (2000) 2193–2203 [4.53] Mann, M.; Stephan, K.: Inﬂuence of convection on nucleate boiling heat transfer around horizontal tubes. J. Multiphase Sci. Technol. 12 (2001) 1–15 [4.54] Kern, J.; Stephan P.: Assessment of a theoretical model for the nucleate boiling hat transfer coeﬃcient of binary mixtures. Proc. 3rd European Thermal Sciences Conf., Eurotherm, Heidelberg (2000) 779–784 [4.55] Stephan, P.: Microscale evaporative heat transfer: modelling and experimental validation. Proc. 12th Int. Heat Transfer Conf., Vol. 1 (2002) 315–327 [4.56] Stephan, K.: Inﬂuence of dispersion forces on phase equilibria between thin liquid ﬁlms and their vapour. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 45 (2002) 4715–4725 [4.57] Mitrovi´c, J.: Das Abreißen von Dampfblasen an festen Heizﬂ¨achen. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 26 (1983) 955–963 [4.58] Stephan, K.: Bubble formation and heat transfer in natural convection boiling. In: Hahne, E.; Grigull, U.: Heat transfer in boiling. Washington: Hemisphere 1977, p. 3–20 [4.59] Genske,P.; Stephan, K.: Numerical simulation of heat transfer during growth of single vapor bubbles. Int. J. Thermal Sci. 45 (2006) 299–309 [4.60] Bashfort, F.; Adams, J.: An attempt to test the theory of capillary action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1883 [4.61] Fritz, W.: Berechnung des Maximalvolumens von Dampfblasen. Phys. Z. 36 (1935) 379–384 ¨ [4.62] Fritz, W.; Ende, W.: Uber den Verdampfungsvorgang nach kinematographischen Aufnahmen an Dampfblasen. Phys. Z. 37 (1936) 391–401

Literature

713

¨ [4.63] Kabanow, W.; Frumkin, A.: Nachtrag zu der Arbeit Uber die Gr¨oße elektrisch entwi” ckelter Gasblasen“. Z. Phys. Chem. (A) 166 (1933) 316–317 [4.64] K¨onig, A.: Der Einﬂuß der thermischen Heizwandeigenschaften auf den W¨arme¨ ubergang bei der Blasenverdampfung. W¨ arme- und Stoﬀ¨ ubertragung 6 (1973) 38–44 [4.65] von Ceumern, W.C.: Abreißdurchmesser und Frequenzen von Dampfblasen in Wasser und w¨assrigen NaCl-L¨ osungen beim Sieden an einer horizontalen Heizﬂ¨ache. Diss. TU Braunschweig 1975 [4.66] Jakob, M.; Linke, W.: Der W¨ arme¨ ubergang von einer waagerechten Platte an siedendes Wasser. Forsch. Ing-Wes. 4 (1933) 75–81 [4.67] Zuber, N.: Nucleate boiling. The region of isolated bubbles and the similarity with natural convection. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 6 (1963) 53–78 [4.68] McFadden, P.; Grassmann, P.: The relation between bubble frequency and diameter. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 5 (1962) 169–173 [4.69] Cole, R.: Bubble frequencies and departure volumes at subatmospheric pressures. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 13 (1967) 779–783 [4.70] Ivey, H.J.: Relationships between bubble frequency, departure diameter and rise velocity in nucleate boiling. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 10 (1967) 1023–1040 [4.71] Malenkov, I.G.: The frequency of vapor-bubble separation as a function of bubble size. Fluid Mech. Sov. Res. 1 (1972) 36–42 [4.72] Jakob, M.; Linke, W.: Der W¨ arme¨ ubergang beim Verdampfen von Fl¨ ussigkeiten an senkrechten und waagerechten Fl¨ achen. Phys. Z. 36 (1935) 267–280 [4.73] Nukijama, S.: Maximum and minimum values of heat transmitted from metal to boiling water under atmospheric pressure. J. Soc. Mech. Eng. Jpn. 37 (1934) 53–54, 367–374; compare also Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 9 (1966) 1419–1433 [4.74] Stephan, K.: Stabilit¨ at beim Sieden. Brennst.-W¨arme-Kraft 17 (1965) 571–578 [4.75] Stephan, K.; Abdelsalam, M.: Heat transfer correlations for natural convection boiling. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 23 (1980) 73–87 [4.76] Stephan, K.; Preußer, P.: W¨ arme¨ ubergang und maximale W¨armestoﬀdichte beim Beh¨altersieden bin¨ arer und tern¨ arer Fl¨ ussigkeitsgemische. Chem. Ing. Tech. 51 (1979) 37 (Synopsis MS 649/79) [4.77] Fritz, W.: Blasenverdampfung (nucleate boiling) im S¨attigungszustand der Fl¨ ussigkeit an einfachen Heizﬂ¨ achen. Sect. Hb 2 in: VDI-W¨armeatlas, 1st ed. D¨ usseldorf: VDIVerlag 1963 [4.78] Danilowa, G.N.: Einﬂuß von Druck und Temperatur auf den W¨arme¨ ubergang an siedende Freone (russ.). Cholod. Techn. 4 (1965) 36–42 [4.79] Gorenﬂo, D.; Kenning, D.: Pool boiling. Sect. H2 in: VDI-HeatAtlas, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2010 [4.80] Gorenﬂo, D.: Zur Druckabh¨ angigkeit des W¨ arme¨ ubergangs an siedende K¨altemittel bei freier Konvektion. Chem. Ing. Tech. 40 (1968) 757–762 and Diss. TH Karlsruhe 1966. [4.81] Slipˇcevi´c, B.: W¨ arme¨ ubergang bei der Blasenverdampfung von K¨altemitteln an glatten und berippten Rohren. Klima + K¨ altetech. 3 (1975) 279–286 [4.82] Kutateladze, S.S.: Critical heat ﬂux of a subcooled liquid ﬂow (in russian). Energetica 7 (1959) 229–239, and Izv. Akad. Nauk. Otd. Tekh. Nauk 4 (1951) 529

714

Literature

[4.83] Zuber, N.: On the stability of boiling heat transfer. Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. C. J. Heat Transfer 80 (1958) 711 [4.84] Roetzel, W.: Berechnung der Leitung und Strahlung bei der Filmverdampfung an der ebenen Platte. W¨ arme- und Stoﬀ¨ ubertragung 12 (1979) 1–4 [4.85] Collier, J.G.: Convective boiling and condensation. New York: McGraw-Hill 1972 [4.86] Baker, O.: Simultaneous ﬂow of oil and gas. Oil Gas J. 53 (1954) 184–195 [4.87] Hewitt, H.F.; Roberts, D.N.: Studies of two phase ﬂow patterns by simultaneous X-ray and ﬂash photography. UK At. Energy Agency Rep. No. AERE-M 2159, H.M.S.O., 1969 [4.88] Taitel, Y.; Dukler, A.E.: A model for predicting ﬂow regime transitions in horizontal and near horizontal gas-liquid ﬂow. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 22 (1976) 47–55 [4.89] Schl¨ under, E.U. (Ed.): Heat Exchanger Design Handbook. Washington: Hemisphere Publishing 1986, Vol. 2, Chapt. 2.3. [4.90] Lockhart, R.W.; Martinelli, R.C.: Proposed correlation data for isothermal two-phase, two-component ﬂow in pipes. Chem. Eng. Prog. 45 (1949) 38–48 [4.91] McAdams, W.H.; Wood, W.K.; Heroman, L.C.: Vaporization inside horizontal tubes-IIbenzene-oil mixtures. Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., 64 (1942) 193–200 [4.92] Cicchitti, A.; Lombardi, C.; Silvestri, M.; Soldaini, G.; Zavatarlli, R.: Two-phase cooling experiments-pressure drop, heat transfer and burnout measurements. Energia Nucleare 7 (1960) 407–425 [4.93] Dukler, A.E.; Wicks, M.; Cleveland, R.G.: Pressure drop and hold-up in two-phase ﬂow. Part A: A comparison of existing correlations, Part B: An approach through similarity analysis. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 10 (1964) 38–51 [4.94] Chawla, J.M.: W¨ arme¨ ubergang und Druckabfall in waagerechten Rohren bei der Str¨omung von verdampfenden K¨ altemitteln. VDI-Forschungsh. 523 (1967) [4.95] Stephan, K.; Auracher, H.: Correlations for nucleate boiling heat transfer in forced convection. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 24 (1981) 99–107 [4.96] Pujol L.: Boiling heat transfer in vertical upﬂow and downﬂow tubes. Ph. D. Thesis. Lehigh Univ. 1968 [4.97] Steiner, D.: W¨ arme¨ ubergang beim Str¨ omungsverhalten von Reinstoﬀen und von Mischungen. Habil.-Thesis. Univ. Karlsruhe 1996. See also: Kind, M.; Saito, Y.: Sect. H3.4, in: VDI-HeatAtlas, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2010 [4.98] Chen, J.C.: Correlation for boiling heat transfer to saturated liquids in convective ﬂow. Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev. 5 (1966) 322–329 [4.99] Forster, H.K.; Zuber, N.: Dynamics of vapour bubbles and boiling heat transfer. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 4 (1955) 531–535 [4.100] Jallouk, P.A.: Two-phase pressure drop and heat transfer characteristics of refrigerants in vertical tubes. Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. Tennessee, U. Microﬁlms 75-11-171, 1974 [4.101] Gungor, K.E.; Winterton, R.H.S.: A general correlation for ﬂow boiling in tubes and in annuli. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 29 (1986) 351–358 [4.102] Davis, E.J.; Anderson, G.H.: The incipience of nucleate boiling in forced convection ﬂow. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 12 (1966) 774–780 [4.103] Bergles, F.E.; Rohsenow, W.M.: The determination of forced-convection surface boiling heat transfer. Amer. Soc. Mech. Eng. Trans. Sec. V (1964) 365–372

Literature

715

[4.104] Shah, M.M.: A new correlation for heat transfer during boiling ﬂow through pipes. Trans. Am. Soc. Heating Refrig. Air Cond. Eng. (ASHRAE) 82 (1976) 66–86 [4.105] Shah, M.M.: Chart Correlation for saturated boiling heat transfer: Equations and further study. Trans. Am. Soc. Heating Refrig. Air Cond. Eng. (ASHRAE). Preprint No. 2673, 1982 [4.106] Bonilla, C.F.; Perry, C.W.: Heat transmission to boiling binary mixtures. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 37 (1941) 685–705 [4.107] Preußer, P.: W¨ arme¨ ubergang beim Verdampfen bin¨arer und tern¨arer Fl¨ ussigkeitsgemische. Diss. Ruhr-Univ. Bochum 1978 [4.108] Stephan, K.; K¨ orner, M.: Berechnung des W¨ arme¨ ubergangs verdampfender bin¨arer Fl¨ ussigkeitsgemische. Chem. Ing. Tech. 41 (1969) 409–417

Chapter 5: Thermal radiation [5.1]

DIN 1315: Winkel. Begriﬀe, Einheiten. edition August 1982. Berlin: Beuth-Verlag

[5.2]

Lambert, J.H.: Photometria, sive de mensura et gradibus luminis, colorum et umbrae. Augsburg 1760. German in Ostwalds Klassiker d. exakten Wissensch. Nr. 31–33, Leipzig: Engelmann 1892, English version: Lambert, J.H.: Photometry or On The Measure and Gradations of light, Color, and Shade. 2001. Illumination Engineering Society of North America, New York, ISBN: 978-0-87995-179-5 - translated by David L. DeLaura

[5.3]

¨ Wien, W.: Uber die Energievertheilung im Emissionsspektrum eines schwarzen K¨orpers. Ann. Phys. Ser. 3, 58 (1896) 662–669, English version: Wien, W.: On the Division of Energy in the Emission-Spectrum of a Black Body, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, Series 5, Vol. 43, No. 262, p. 214-220, March 1897 - translated by J. Burke

[5.4]

Siegel, R.; Howell, J.R.; Lohrengel, J.: W¨ arme¨ ubertragung durch Strahlung. Part 1. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1988, English version: Siegel, R.; Howell, J.R.; Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer. Volume 1 - The Blackbody, Electromagnetic Theory, and Material Properties. NASA SP-164, Washington, D.C., 1968

[5.5]

¨ Kirchhoﬀ, G.: Uber das Verh¨ altnis zwischen dem Emissionsverm¨ogen und dem Absorptionsverm¨ogen der K¨ orper f¨ ur W¨ arme und Licht. Ann. Phys. 19 (1860) 275–301, English version: Kirchoﬀ, G.: On the Relation between the Radiating and Absorbing Powers of diﬀerent Bodies for Heat and Light, The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, Series 4, Vol. 20, No. 130, p. 1-21, July 1860 translated by F. Guthrie

[5.6]

Planck, M.: Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspektrum. Ann. Phys. 4 (1901) 553–563

[5.7]

Reif, F.: Statistische Physik und Theorie der W¨ arme, p. 437–454. Berlin: W. de Gruyter 1987, English version: Reif, F.: Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics. New York. McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1965

[5.8]

Mohr, P.J.; Taylor, B.N.: CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 1998. Rev. of Modern Phys. 72(2) (2000) 351–495

[5.9]

Draper, J.W.: On the production of light by heat. Philos. Mag. Ser. 3, 30 (1847) 345–360

[5.10] Wien, W.: Temperatur und Entropie der Strahlung. Ann. Phys. Ser. 2, 52 (1894) 132– 165

716

Literature

[5.11] Viskanta, R.; Anderson, E.E.: Heat transfer in semitransparent solids. In: Hartnett, J.P.; Irvine, T. (Eds.): Advances in heat transfer, Vol. 11, New York: Academic Press 1975 [5.12] Quinn, T.J.; Martin, J.E.: A radiometric determination of the Stefan-Boltzmann constant and thermodynamic temperatures between −40 ◦ C and +100 ◦ C. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 316 (1985) 85–189 ¨ [5.13] Stefan, J.: Uber die Beziehung zwischen der W¨armestrahlung und der Temperatur. Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien 79, part 2 (1879) 391–428 [5.14] Boltzmann, L.: Ableitung des Stefanschen Gesetzes, betreﬀend die Abh¨angigkeit der W¨armestrahlung von der Temperatur aus der elektromagnetischen Lichttheorie. Ann. Phys. Ser. 2, 22 (1884) 291–294 [5.15] Pivovonsky, M.; Nagel, M.R.: Tables of Blackbody Radiation Functions. New York: Macmillan Comp. 1961 [5.16] Wiebelt, J.A.: Engineering Radiation Heat Transfer. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1966 [5.17] Schmidt, E.: Die W¨ armestrahlung von Wasser und Eis, von bereiften und benetzten Oberﬂ¨achen. Forsch. Ing.-Wes. 5 (1934) 1–5 ¨ [5.18] Schmidt, E.; Eckert, E.: Uber die Richtungsverteilung der W¨armestrahlung von Oberﬂ¨achen. Forsch. Ing. Wes. 6 (1935) 175–183 [5.19] Sieber, W.: Zusammensetzung der von Werk- und Baustoﬀen zur¨ uckgeworfenen W¨armestrahlung. Z. techn. Physik 22 (1941) 130–135 [5.20] Sparrow, E.M.; Cess, R.D.: Radiation Heat Transfer. Belmont, Cal.: Brooks/Cole Publ. Comp. 1966, p. 68 [5.21] Dunkle, R.V.: Emissivity and inter-reﬂection relationships for inﬁnite parallel specular surfaces. In: Symp. on Thermal Radiation of solids (S. Katzoﬀ, Ed.) NASA SP-55 (1955) 39–44 [5.22] Drude, P.: Physik des Aethers auf elektromagnetischer Grundlage. 1st ed. 1894, 2nd ed. by W. K¨onig. Stuttgart: Enke 1912 [5.23] Hagen, E.; Rubens, H.: Das Reﬂexionsverm¨ ogen von Metallen und belegten Glasspiegeln. Ann. Phys. 1 (1900) 352–375 sowie: Emissionsverm¨ogen und elektrische Leitf¨ahigkeit der Metallegierungen. Verh. Dtsch. Phys. Ges. (1904) 128–136 [5.24] Eckert, E.: Messung der Reﬂexion von W¨ armestrahlen an technischen Oberﬂ¨achen. Forschung Ing.-Wes. 7 (1936) 265–270 [5.25] Kleemann, M.; Meliß, M.: Regenerative Energiequellen. 2nd ed., p. 50–69. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1993 [5.26] DIN 1349: Durchgang optischer Strahlung durch Medien. Ed. June 1972. Berlin: Beuth Verlag [5.27] Hale, G.M.; Querry, M.R.: Optical constants of water in the 200-nm to 200-μm wavelength region. Appl. Optics 12 (1973) 555–563 [5.28] Winter, C.-J.; Sizmann, R.L.; Vant-Hull, L.L. (Eds.): Solar Power Plants. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1991 [5.29] Duﬃe, J.A.; Beckmann, W.A.: Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. New York: J. Wiley 1980 [5.30] Kreider, J.F.; Kreith, F. (Eds.): Solar Energy Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill 1981

Literature

717

[5.31] Spencer, J.W.: Fourier series representation of the position of the sun. Search 2 (1971) 172 [5.32] German, S.; Drath, P.: Handbuch SI-Einheiten, p. 17, Braunschweig: Fr. Vieweg u. Sohn 1979 [5.33] Fr¨ohlich, C.; Brusa, R.W.: Solar radiation and its variation in time. Sol. Phys. 74 (1981) 209–215 [5.34] Iqbal, M.: An Introduction to Solar Radiation. Toronto: Academic Press 1983 [5.35] Kasten, F.; Young, A.T.: Revised optical air mass tables and approximation formula. Applied Optics, 28 (1989) 4735–4738 [5.36] Strutt, J.W. (Lord Rayleigh): On the light from the sky, its polarisation and colour appendix. Phil. Mag. 41 (1871) 107–120, and: On the scattering of light by small particles. Phil. Mag. 41 (1871) 447–454 [5.37] Siegel, R.; Howell, J.R.: Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer, 4th ed. New York: Taylor and Francis 2001 [5.38] Bird, R.E.; Riordan, C.: Simple solar spectral model for direct and diﬀuse irradiance on horizontal and tilted planes at the earth’s surface for cloudless atmospheres. J. Climate and Appl. Meteorology 25 (1986) 87–97 ˚ngstr¨om, A.: On the atmospheric transmission of sun radiation and on dust in the air. [5.39] A Geograﬁs. Annal. 2 (1929) 156–166 und 3 (1930) 130–159 [5.40] Lohrer, W. (Ed.): Verzicht aus Verantwortung. Maßnahmen zur Rettung der Ozonschicht. Berlin: E. Schmidt 1989 [5.41] Robinson, N. (Eds.): Solar Radiation. New York: American Elsevier 1966 [5.42] Bird, R.E.; Hulstrom, R.L.: Direct insolation models. Trans. ASME, J. Sol. Energy Eng. 103 (1981) 182–192, —: A simpliﬁed clear sky model for direct and diﬀuse insolation on horizontal surfaces, SERI/TR-642-761, Solar Energy Research Institute, Golden, Colorado, (1981) [5.43] Robinson, G.D.: Absorption of solar radiation by atmospheric aerosol as revealed by measurements from the ground. Arch. Meterol. Geophys. Bioclimatol. B 12 (1962) 19– 40 [5.44] Kondratyev, K.Y.: Radiation in the Atmosphere. New York: Academic Press 1969. —: Radiation processes in the atmosphere. World Meteorological Organization, No. 309, 1972 [5.45] Siegel, R.; Howell, J.R.; Lohrengel, J.: W¨ arme¨ ubertragung durch Strahlung. Part 2: Strahlungsaustausch zwischen Oberﬂ¨ achen und Umh¨ ullungen. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1991, English version: Siegel, R.; Howell, J.R.: Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer, Volume II - Radiation Exchange Between Surfaces and in Enclosures, NASA SP-164, Washington, D.C., 1969 [5.46] Vortmeyer, D.: View Factors. Sect. K2 in: VDI-HeatAtlas, 2nd ed. Berlin: SpringerVerlag 2010 [5.47] Howell, J.R.: A Catalog of Radiation Conﬁguration Factors. New York: McGraw-Hill 1982 [5.48] Hottel, H.C.; Saroﬁm, A.F.: Radiative Transfer. New York: McGraw-Hill 1967 [5.49] Poljak, G.: Analysis of heat interchange by radiation between diﬀuse surfaces (in russian). Techn. Phys. USSR 1 (1935) 555–590

718

Literature

[5.50] Oppenheim, K.A.: Radiation analysis by the network method. Trans. Amer. Soc. Mech. Engrs. 78 (1956) 725–735 [5.51] Eckert, E.R.G.: Einf¨ uhrung in den W¨ arme- und Stoﬀaustausch. 3rd ed. Berlin: SpringerVerlag 1966, English version: Eckert, E.R.G.; Gross, J.F.: Introduction to Heat and Mass Transfer, New York, McGraw-Hill,1963. ¨ [5.52] Schack, A.: Uber die Strahlung der Feuergase und ihre praktische Berechnung. Z. techn. Phys. 5 (1924) 267–278 [5.53] Schmidt, E.: Messung der Gesamtstrahlung des Wasserdampfes bei Temperaturen bis 1000 ◦ C. Forsch. Ing.-Wes. 3 (1932) 57–70 [5.54] Schmidt, E.; Eckert, E.: Die W¨ armestrahlung von Wasserdampf in Mischung mit nichtstrahlenden Gasen. Forsch. Ing.-Wes. 8 (1937) 87–90 [5.55] Eckert, E.: Messung der Gesamtstrahlung von Wasserdampf und Kohlens¨aure in Mischung mit nichtstrahlenden Gasen bei Temperaturen bis 1300 ◦ C. VDI-Forschungsheft 387, Berlin: 1937 [5.56] Hottel, H.C.; Mangelsdorf, H.G.: Heat transmission by radiation from nonluminous gases. Trans. Amer. Inst. Chem. Eng. 31 (1935) 517–549 [5.57] Hottel, H.C.; Egbert, R.B.: The radiation of furnace gases. Trans. ASME 63 (1941) 297–307 [5.58] Hottel, H.C.; Egbert, R.B.: Radiant heat transmission from water vapor. Trans. Amer. Inst. Chem. Eng. 38 (1942) 531–568 [5.59] Vortmeyer, D.; Kabelac, St.: Gas radiation. Sect. K3 in: VDI-HeatAtlas, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2010 [5.60] Schack, A.: Berechnung der Strahlung von Wasserdampf und Kohlendioxid. Chemie-Ing. Techn. 42 (1970) 53–58 [5.61] Schack, A.: Zur Berechnung der Wasserdampfstrahlung. Chemie-Ing. Techn. 43 (1971) 1151–1153 [5.62] Kohlgr¨ uber, K.: Formeln zur Berechnung des Emissionsgrades von CO2 - und H2 O-Gasstrahlung bei Industrie¨ ofen, Brennkammern und W¨armeaustauschern. Gasw¨arme International 35 (1986) 412–417 [5.63] Kostowski, E.: Analytische Bestimmung des Emissionsgrades von Abgasen. Gasw¨arme International 40 (1991) 529–534 [5.64] Elgeti, K.: Ein neues Verfahren zur Berechnung des Strahlungsaustausches zwischen einem Gas und einer grauen Wand. Brennst.-W¨ arme-Kraft 14 (1962) 1–6 [5.65] Edwards, D.K.: Absorption by infrared bands of carbon dioxide gas at elevated pressures and temperatures. J. Optical Soc. Amer. 50 (1960) 617–626 [5.66] G¨orner, K.; Dietz, U.: Strahlungsaustauschrechnungen mit der Monte-Carlo-Methode. Chem.-Ing. Techn. 62 (1990) 23–29 [5.67] Biermann, P.; Vortmeyer, D.: W¨ armestrahlung staubhaltiger Gase. W¨arme- und Stoﬀu ¨bertr. 2 (1969) 193–202 [5.68] Brummel, H.-G.; Kakaras, E.: W¨ armestrahlungsverhalten von Gas-Feststoﬀgemischen bei niedrigen, mittleren und hohen Staubbeladungen. W¨arme- und Stoﬀ¨ ubertr. 25 (1990) 129–140 [5.69] Vortmeyer, D.; Kabelac, St.: Thermal radiation of gas-solids-dispersions. Sect. K4 in: VDI-HeatAtlas, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2010

Literature

719

[5.70] Richter, W.; G¨orner, K.: Heat radiation in furnaces. Sect. K5 in: VDI-HeatAtlas, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2010

Index

Absorber 99, 100 –, countercurrent 96 –, ideal 567 Absorbers in the infrared region 605 Absorption 95, 605 – bands 605 – of solar radiation 605, 611 – – by CO2 and other gases 605, 608 – – by aerosols 603 – – by ozone 603, 605, 608 – – by water vapour 605, 608 – in the atmosphere 601, 605 – of radiation 25, 559 Absorption coeﬃcient, spectral 594, 638 –, – of gases 638, 640 –, – of water 595 Absorption column 95 Absorptivity 26, 27, 562, 562, 582, 640 –, calculation of 583 –, directional spectral 560, 561, 583, 583 –, – of gases 640 –, directional total 561, 584 – for solar radiation 611, 612 –, hemispherical spectral 561, 583 –, hemispherical total 561, 564, 584 – of a grey emitter 28 – of a grey Lambert radiator 585 – of gases 651 – of metals 592 –, pure 596 –, –, spectral 594 Acceleration pressure drop 522 Ackermann correction 455, 482 Action quantum 546 Adiabatic enclosure 567, 567, 568 Adiabatic evaporative cooling 88 Adiabatic ﬂow 428 Adiabatic heat exchanger 46 Adiabatic mixing temperature 13, 367, 370, 375 Adiabatic surface 221

Adiabatic wall temperature 429 ADIP method 215 Aerosol scattering 600, 604, 608 Aerosols 604 Albedo 611 Analogy between momentum, heat and mass transfer 379, 431 Analogy procedure 144 Angular coordinates 549 Annular ﬁn 131, 135 Annular ﬂow 489, 514, 515, 516, 529 Annular space, concentric 408 Antiwetting agents 470 Approximation, Boussinesq 23, 417 –, Oberbeck-Boussinesq 417 – for large times 171 – for small Biot numbers 178 – for small times 173 Archimedes number 399 Area, average 6 –, mean 7 –, speciﬁc surface 259, 382 Arrangement factor 383 Assmann’s Aspiration psychrometer 91 Attenuation coeﬃcient 601 Attenuation of solar radiation 600 Average area 6 Average ﬂuid temperature 14, 352 Average heat transfer coeﬃcient 14 Average mass velocity 69 Average molar mass 68 Average molar velocity 69, 243 Average mole fraction 76 Average pressure 291 Average temperature 12, 173 – of a cylinder 167 – of a plate 168, 167 – of a sphere 167 Baﬄes 42, 42 Baker diagrams

516

Index

Balance equations 280, 308 Band approximation 654 Beam length of a gas 638 –, mean 643, 646, 647, 650 Beer’s law 601, 639 Bernoulli’s equation 314, 354 Binary mixture 285, 424, 473 Biot number 119, 162 – of the diﬀerence method 201 –, small 178 Black body 26, 567, 569 –, deﬁnition of a 569 –, – of absorptivity 563 –, – of reﬂectivity 565 –, emissive power of a 574, 577 –, –, hemispherical spectral 571, 572, 575 –, radiation from a 569, 569, 571, 574 –, realisation of a 569, 570 –, spectral intensity of a 568, 571 Blasius’ law 525, 526, 527 Bodies in contact 115 Body, black 26, 567, 569 –, grey 584 –, semi-inﬁnite 151, 152, 153 –, transparent 593 Body force 287 Bouguer’s law 601, 639 Boiler 97 –, operating line of a 504, 504 –, operating point of a 504 –, resistance line of a 504, 504 Boiling 489 –, convective 489 –, – in vertical tubes 536 –, ﬁlm 502, 512, 533 – in free ﬂow 500, 505 – –, ﬁlm 512 – –, nucleate 509 – –, –, general equation for 509 – –, – in a horizontal bank of smooth or ﬁnned tubes 510 – –, – on horizontal copper tubes 510 – –, – of water 507, 509 –, –, stability during 502 –, –, – at maximum heat ﬂux 505 –, nucleate 488, 529 –, –, departure from 502 –, –, transition to 528 – of helium 547 – of mixtures 536 –, pool 500 –, saturated 530, 535 –, stagnant 487, 488, 500

721

–, subcooled 535 Boiling characteristic 504 Boiling crisis 534 Boiling diagram 539, 540 Boiling line 502 Boiling point 474 Boiling state, critical 533 Boltzmann constant 571 Bottom product 97 Boundary condition 113, 114, 152, 162, 251 –, ﬁrst type of 114 – in the diﬀerence method 199, 206, 219 –, second type of 114 –, third type of 115 Boundary layer 10, 315 –, concentration 278, 323 –, detachment of 353, 354 –, laminar 336 –, thermal 276, 277, 319 –, – of multicomponent mixtures 321 –, turbulent 327 –, –, velocity distribution in the 334 –, vapour 474 –, velocity 315, 315 Boundary layer equations 315, 323, 329 –, concentration 323 –, solution of 323, 343 –, thermal 321 – for turbulent ﬂow 329 –, velocity 318 Boundary layer ﬂows 314 Boundary layer theory 85 Boundary layer thickness 12, 345 –, mean 317 Boussinesq approximation 23, 417 Boussinesq rule 330, 350 Bubble ﬂow 489, 514, 515, 516, 529 Bubble frequency 498, 499, 500 Bubble radius 492 –, critical 493 Buﬀer-layer 335 Bulk viscosity 291, 302 Buoyancy 24 Buoyancy ﬂow 24 Buoyancy forces 23, 415 Burnout 502, 503 –, deposition controlled 533 – phenomenon 505 Calculation of absorptivities 583 – of heat transferred in a heat exchanger – of the size of a condenser 483 – of wall temperatures 33

48

722

Capillary forces 497 Catalyst surface 255, 254 Cauchy’s equation of motion 292, 292 Cauchy’s theorem 146 Celsius temperature 2 Characteristic density number 23 Characteristic number 19 –, dimensionless 16, 17, 19 –, – of heat conduction 117 Characteristic quantity 17 Churn ﬂow 514, 529 Circumferential angle 549 Clausius-Clapeyron equation 493 Cocurrent ﬂow 41, 42, 55 – heat exchanger 42, 50, 53 – of vapour and condensate 474 Coiled tube heat exchanger 43 Colburn relationship 530 Collectors 594 Column height 100 Component continuity equation 284 Compressible ﬂow 426 Concentration boundary layer 278, 323 Concentration jump 252 Concentration proﬁle 98 – in condensation of vapour mixtures 474 Concept of heat 1 Condensate ﬁlm, laminar 447 –, turbulent 460, 461 Condensate formation as a droplet mist 445 Condensation 443 – in co- and countercurrent ﬂow 475 –, dropwise 444, 445, 469 –, energy balance for the vapour in 481 –, ﬁlm 444, 445 –, inﬂuence of non-condensable gases on 454, 457 –, inﬂuence of vapour shear stress on 465 –, limiting cases in 480 –, local total 477, 480 –, material balance for the vapour in 481 – of ﬂowing vapours 464 – of immiscible liquids 445 – of vapour mixtures 473 –, partial 477 –, reduction of heat ﬂow in 476 –, types of 444 Condensation nuclei 446 Condenser 54, 97 –, calculation of the size of a 483 –, energy balance of a 482 –, material balance of a 481 –, partial 473

Index

–, reﬂux 475 –, tube bundle 459, 468 Conduction of heat 2, 5, 107 Conductor, electrical 588, 590 Conﬁguration factor 613 Conformal mapping 136 Constant, optical 587 Constitutive equations 295, 303 Contact angle 444, 498, 498 Contact between two bodies 156 Contact heat transfer coeﬃcient 114 Contact resistance 114 Contact temperature 157 Contact time 87 Continuity equation 283, 317, 324 –, component 284 Convection, forced 22, 489 –, free 22 –, natural 22 Convective boiling 489 – in vertical tubes 536 Convective evaporation 529, 530, 531 – in horizontal tubes 536 Convective ﬂow, vanishing 80 Convective heat transfer 10 – to liquid 529 – on vapour 529 Convective vaporization 529 Converter, catalytic 257 Convolution theorem 145, 191 Cooling 161 – of a cuboid 175 – of a cylinder 161, 169, 175 – of a parallelepiped 175 – of a plate 161, 165 – of a semi-inﬁnite body 151 – of simple bodies 161 – of a sphere 161, 169 – of a steel plate 203, 207 – of superheated steam 54 – of thin walled vessels 38, 38, 40 – of vessels 116 Cooling time 172, 176, 177 Coordinates, spherical 549 Correspondence table 147, 148 Cosine law 555, 556 Couette ﬂow 309 Countercurrent absorber 96 Countercurrent ﬂow 41, 42, 54 – in falling ﬁlm columns 475 – in reﬂux condensers 475 Countercurrent heat exchanger 41, 50 Counterdiﬀusion, equimolar 76

Index

Counter-radiation, atmospheric 601, 609 Creeping ﬂow 313 Critical boiling state 533 Critical heat ﬂux 502, 503, 511, 534 Crossﬂow 43, 57, 60, 62, 353, 357 –, circular cylinder in 353, 354, 358, 362 –, cylinder of arbitrary proﬁle in 363 –, non-circular cylinder in 356, 362 –, single-sided laterally mixed 57, 58, 60 –, sphere in 356 –, tube bundles in 357 – with a tube row 58 Crossﬂow heat exchanger 57 –, counter 105 Cross sectional average temperature 12 Cylinder 7 – in crossﬂow 353, 354, 358, 362 –, ﬁnite 175 –, horizontal 422 –, non-circular 356, 362 Cylindrical wall 8 Damk¨ohler number 256 Day number 598 Declination of the sun 600 Deformation velocity tensor 294 Density 18 – of a two-phase mixture 521 Departure diameter 498, 498 Departure from nucleate boiling 502 Dephlegmator 473 Deposition controlled burnout 533 Designing a heat exchanger 45, 48 Detachment point 353 Detachment volume of vapour 499 Development of the error integral, asymptotic 153 Deviator 291, 294 Dew point 474 Dielectrics 588 Diﬀerence equations 195–197, 217 –, explicit 196, 214 –, –, stability behaviour of 201, 210 – for an adiabatic boundary 200, 221 – for a cylinder 210 – for grid points close to the boundary 220 – for grid points on a boundary 220, 221 – for grid points with stipulated heat ﬂux 222 – for plane temperature ﬁelds 214, 217 –, implicit 205, 215 –, instability of 197, 198 –, ε-scheme for 197

723

Diﬀerence method 194, 195 –, Crank-Nicolson 205, 211, 211 –, explicit 195 –, – with constant material properties 210 –, – with temperature dependent material properties 212, 212 – for cylindrical coordinates 208 – for plane temperature ﬁelds 216 – for spherical coordinates 208 – for transient heat conduction 195 –, graphical 198 –, implicit 205, 211 –, – with constant material properties 211 –, modulus of 196, 208, 210 Diﬀerence quotient 195 –, central 199 –, –, second 196 –, forward 196 Diﬀerential equations 107 – for annular ﬁns 131 – for straight ﬁns 131 – for the concentration ﬁeld 245, 247 – for the Laplace transform 146, 148, 152 – for the temperature ﬁeld 107, 110, 111 Diﬀerential operator, self-adjoint 209 Diﬀuse radiating surface 551, 556 Diﬀuse radiator 555, 584 Diﬀuse reﬂection 565, 622, 635 Diﬀusion 66, 67, 72, 242 – coeﬃcient 71, 72 – –, turbulent 330 – equation 242, 249, 250 –, equimolar 73, 80, 244 –, molecular 66 –, steady-state 254, 258 –, – with catalytic surface reaction 254 –, – with homogeneous reaction 258 – through a semipermeable plane 73, 74 –, transient 262 –, – with one-dimensional mass ﬂow 264 –, – in a semi-inﬁnite solid 263 –, turbulent 66 Diﬀusional ﬂux 69, 72, 245, 246, 252 –, turbulent 329 Diﬀusion resistance factor 258 Diﬀusive ﬂuxes 68 Dilatation 293 Dimensionless groups 45 Dimensionless numbers 15 Dimensionless variables 16 Directional distribution 547 – of radiative energy 547, 549, 550 – of reﬂected radiation 565

724

Directional emissive power 556 Discretisation of diﬀerential equations 195 – of boundary conditions 199 – of the heat transfer condition 201 – of the self-adjoint diﬀerential operator 209 Discretisation error 196, 217 Disk ﬁns 135, 136 Displacement law 573 Dissipated energy 302 –, mechanically 303 Dissipated power 109 Dissipation, viscous 303, 320 Distillate 97 Diversion factor 259 Double pipe heat exchanger 41, 42 Drag 299 Draper point 572 Drop ﬂow 514, 515, 516, 529 Droplet mist 445 Dropwise condensation 444, 445, 469 – on a vertical condensation surface 471 –, theory of 471 Drying 84, 380, 398 Dryout 533 – of a heating surface 534 Eccentricity factor 598 Eckert number 20, 321 Eddy vi, 327 Eddy diﬀusivity 330 – for heat transfer 330 – for mass transfer 330 – for momentum transfer 330 Eﬃciency of annular ﬁns 135 – of ﬁns 36, 129, 133, 135 – of a heat exchanger 52 – of sheet ﬁns 135 – of straight ﬁns 134, 135 Eﬀectiveness of a heat exchanger 52 Eigenfunction 164 Eigentemperature 429, 435 – of an air ﬂow 429 Eigenvalue 164, 170, 375 –, smallest 167 Eigenvalue problem, Sturm-Liouville 164, 165 Electromagnetic waves 545 –, spectrum of 546, 547 Emission 25, 548 – radiation quantities of 551, 553 Emission bands 641 Emission of radiation 548 Emissive power 548, 549, 551, 553, 582

Index

–, directional 556 –, hemispherical spectral 551, 552, 553 –, – of a black body 571, 572, 575 –, – of a grey Lambert radiator 585 –, – of a real body 582 –, hemispherical total 549, 551, 552 –, – of a black body 574, 577 –, – of a real body 582 –, – of the sun 579 Emissivity 26, 580, 582, 640, 643 –, directional spectral 581, 583, 583 –, – normal to the surface 588, 590, 591 –, – of CO2 641 –, – of electrical insulators 588, 589 –, – of gases 640 –, – of metals 591 –, directional total 581, 584 –, – normal to the surface 593 –, hemispherical spectral 581, 583 –, – of electrical insulators 590 –, hemispherical total 581, 584 –, – normal to the surface 589, 590 –, – of CO2 644 –, – of electrical insulators 590 –, – of a gas volume 642 –, – of gases 642, 645 –, – of H2 O 645 –, – of metals 590, 593 – of a grey Lambert radiator 585 – of a real body 587 –, spectral 642 –, – of a gas sphere 647, 649 –, – of a gas volume 641 –, total 642 –, – of diﬀerent materials 612 –, – of a gas volume 642 Empirical equations for heat transfer 361, 407, 421, 484, 509, 535 – during nucleate boiling in free ﬂow 509 – in condensation 484 – in external forced ﬂow 361 – in ﬂow through channels, packed and ﬂuidised beds 407 – in free ﬂow 421 – in two-phase ﬂow 535 Empirical equations for mass transfer 361, 407 – in external forced ﬂow 361 – in ﬂow through channels, packed and ﬂuidised beds 407 Enclosure, adiabatic 567, 567, 568 –, isothermal hollow 567, 570, 619, 623 – with three zones 621

Index

– with two zones 628 Enclosure radiation 566 –, hollow 567, 568, 569 –, spectral intensity of 567, 567, 568 Energy, dissipated 302 –, internal, of a ﬂowing ﬂuid 297 –, radiative 547, 549 Energy balance 297 – for a ﬂuidised bed reactor 402 – for multicomponent mixtures 300, 302, 309 – for pure substances 297, 300 – for the vapour in condensation 481 – in porous bodies 387 – of a condenser 482 – of a zone 623 Energy equation 305, 324 – of condensate surface 479 –, enthalpy form of 305, 305, 427 –, temperature form of 305, 306 –, – for incompressible mixtures 307 –, – for incompressible pure substances 307 –, – for mixtures 307, 309 –, – for pure substances 306 Energy quantum 546 Enthalpy of mixtures 306 Entropy 302 – ﬂux 303 – production 303 Entry ﬂow, thermal 372 Entry length 365 –, hydrodynamic 364 Entry temperature 46, 47 Equation system – for radiative exchange 630 – for the radiosity 630, 631 Equations – for the design of a heat exchanger 45 – for the emissivity of gases 644 Equilibrium, hydrostatic 411 –, mechanical 491 –, thermal 491 –, with respect to mass exchange 491 Equilibrium constant 252 Equilibrium line for an absorber 100 Equilibrium radiation 567 Equivalent electrical circuit diagram for radiative exchange 626 Error function 153, 154, 181 – complement 147, 150, 153, 154, 155 –, integrated 154, 155, 188 Euler’s equation 314, 318 Evaporation 486

725

–, convective 529, 530, 531 –, – in horizontal tubes 536 Evaporative cooling 88, 89 –, adiabatic 88 Exit temperature 46, 47 Expansion coeﬃcient 23 –, mass 423 –, thermal 415 Exponential integral 193, 194 External forced ﬂow 335, 361 Extinction coeﬃcient 587, 590 – of electrical insulators 588 Extraction 95 Falling ﬁlm column 475 Feed 97 Fick’s law 71, 245, 247, 249 Fick’s second law 251, 474 Film boiling 502, 512, 533 Film condensation 444, 445 –, laminar 446, 484 –, – on a inclined plate 484 –, – on horizontal tubes 449, 484 –, – on a vertical plate 484 –, – on a vertical tube 484 – of downward ﬂowing vapour 466 – theory 446, 460 –, transition region between laminar and turbulent 485 –, turbulent 460, 466, 485 –, – of vapour ﬂowing in tubes 485 –, – on a inclined plate 484 –, – on a vertical ﬂat wall 461, 463 –, – on a vertical plate 484 –, – on a vertical tube 461, 463, 484 Film theory 81, 88, 285 Film thickness 448, 465 Fin 35, 129 –, annular 131 –, circular 35 –, disk 135, 136 –, –, hexagonal 135 –, –, rectangular 135, 136 –, –, square 135 –, straight 35, 131 – with lowest material use 133 – with rectangular proﬁle 132 Fin eﬃciency 36, 129, 133, 135 Fin height, optimal 133 Finite diﬀerence method 194, 195 Finite element method 194, 213,224 – applied to geometrical one-dimensional, steady-state temperature ﬁelds 225

726

– applied to steady-state plane temperature ﬁelds 230 – applied to transient, geometrical onedimensional heat conduction problems 236 – Extensions to transient, geometrical onedimensional heat conduction problems 241 Finned tube bundle 359 Flat plate 7 – heat exchanger 43 Flat wall 5, 8, 9 Flow, adiabatic 428 –, annular 489, 514, 515, 516, 529 –, bubble 489, 514, 515, 516, 529 –, channel 15 –, churn 514, 529 –, compressible 426 –, creeping 313 –, drop 514, 515, 516 –, external 14 –, –, forced 335, 425 –, free 411, 423, 425 –, – on a horizontal cylinder 422 –, – on a horizontal plate 421 –, – on a inclined plate 422 –, – on a sphere 423 –, – on a vertical plate 423 –, – on a vertical wall 417 –, frictionless 275, 314 –, Hagen-Poiseuille 366, 373 –, heterogeneous 523 –, homogeneous 522, 523 –, internal 12 –, –, forced 364 –, laminar 312, 331 –, –, hydrodynamically fully developed 365 –, –, thermally fully developed 367, 369 –, molar 248 –, plug 514, 515, 516, 529 –, radiative 548, 549 –, semi-annular 489, 516 –, single phase 275 –, slug 489, 515, 516 –, spray 489, 514, 515, 516, 529 –, stratiﬁed 331, 515 –, – in horizontal tubes 485 –, thermal entry 372 –, thermally and hydrodynamically developing 377 –, turbulent 312, 331, 348 –, –, wall law for 332 –, two-phase 513

Index

–, – in a heated channel 518 –, – in a horizontal, heated tube 516 –, – in a horizontal, unheated tube 515 –, – in a vertical, heated tube 490 –, – in a vertical, unheated tube 514 –, wavy 515, 516 –, wispy-annular 514 – with phase change 443 Flow along a ﬂat plate, longitudinal 361 –, parallel 336 Flow around a cylinder in crossﬂow 354, 362 Flow conﬁgurations 41, 64 –, comparison between 62 Flow in circular tubes, laminar 364, 408 –, turbulent 379, 407 Flow in non-circular tubes 408 Flow maps 516 Flow near solid walls, turbulent 331 Flow of vapour and condensate, cocurrent 474 Flow over a ﬂat plate 275, 277, 362 Flow over a sphere 356, 363 Flow pattern diagrams 517 Flow patterns 489 – in a horizontal, heated tube 516 – in a horizontal, unheated tube 515 – in a vertical, heated tube 490, 529 – in a vertical, unheated tube 514 Flow through a packing 409 – of spheres 409 Fluctuations, turbulent 327 –, velocity 327 Fluctuation velocity 328 Fluid ﬂow – in porous bodies 384 Fluid, ideal viscous 295 –, Newtonian 295 Fluid temperature, average 14 –, mean 15 Fluidisation point 399 Fluidisation velocity, minimum 399 Fluidised bed 364, 380, 398, 400, 402, 410 –, heterogeneous 401 –, homogeneous 400 –, pressure drop in 399 – reactor 402 Flux, molar 248 –, molar production 248 Force, body 287 –, friction 311, 414 –, inertia 311, 414 –, lift 411 –, surface 287, 288

Index

–, total 288 Force balance 366 Forced convection 22, 489 Fourier number 118 – of the diﬀerence method 196 Fourier’s law 4, 11, 108, 304 Fraction function 575, 577 Free ﬂow 411, 425 – momentum equation 413 – temperature 12 Fresnel’s equations 587 Fresnel’s reﬂectivity, spectral 595 Frequency 546 Friction factor 324, 339, 345, 348, 379 Friction forces 311, 414 Friction velocity 332 Frictional pressure drop 521, 523 – in homogeneous two-phase ﬂow 525 Frictionless ﬂow 275, 314 Froude number 476 Fundamental law, photometric 613 Fundamental law for heat conduction 4 Fusion enthalpy 180 Galilei number 22, 24 Gamma function 147 Gas, grey 652 – hemisphere 642 – radiation 637 – sphere 646, 647 Gauss’ integral theorem 109, 246, 282 Geodetic pressure drop 522 Gibbs’ fundamental equation 302 Global radiation 609 Graetz-Nusselt Problem 373 Grashof number 24, 416 –, modiﬁed 416, 424 Greenhouse eﬀect 593 Grey body 584 Grey Lambert radiator 585, 611, 612 Grey radiator 28, 584, 584 Grid 195, 203 –, centred 209 –, square 216, 217 Hagen-Poiseuille ﬂow 366, 373 Harmonic mean 212 Hatta number 260 Heat and mass transfer 275, 443 – in binary mixtures 424 –, inﬂuence of turbulence on 327 –, simultaneous 424 Heat capacity, speciﬁc 18

727

Heat capacity ﬂow rate 46 Heat conduction 2, 5, 107 – between two tubes 138 – in a shaped brick 222 –, longitudinal, in a rod 124 –, steady-state 121 –, –, geometric one-dimensional 5, 121 –, transient 142 – with heat sources 121 Heat conduction equation 107, 111, 116 – in cylindrical coordinates 111 – in spherical coordinates 111 – with temperature dependent material properties 117 Heat exchanger 40, 45 –, adiabatic 46 –, counter crossﬂow 105 – design 45, 48 – operating characteristic 48, 49 –, types of 41 Heat explosion 191, 192, 193 Heat ﬂow 5 –, linear 112 –, multi-dimensional 136, 174 – reduction in condensation 476 – through a surface element 4 Heat ﬂux 2, 199, 297, 304 –, critical 502, 511 –, –, limit for the 534 –, maximum 502, 503, 511 –, stipulated 221 –, turbulent 329 Heating 161 – of a cuboid 175 – of a cylinder 161, 169, 175 – of a parallelepiped 175 – of a plate 161, 165 – of a semi-inﬁnite body 151, 152 – of simple bodies 161 – of a sphere 161, 169 – of thin walled vessels 38, 39 – of vessels 116 –, ohmic 109 Heating time 172, 176 Heat sources 110, 121, 187, 198 –, homogeneous 188 –, internal 110 –, linear 189 –, point 189, 190 Heat transfer, convective 10, 275, 443 –, types of 486 –, overall 31 Heat transfer

728

– – – – – – –

during convective boiling 490 during convective evaporation 530 during ﬁlm boiling in free ﬂow 505, 512 during nucleate boiling 486, 490, 530 – in free ﬂow 505 – –, general equation for 509 – –, in a horizontal bank of smooth or ﬁnned tubes 510 – – –, on horizontal copper tubes 510 – – –, of water 507, 509 – inside channels of porous bodies 392 – for ﬂow across a circular cylinder 354, 355, 358, 362 – for ﬂow across a ﬁnned tube bundle 359 – for ﬂow across a non-circular cylinder 356, 362 – for ﬂow across a smooth tube bundle 358, 363 – for ﬂow along a ﬂat plate 361 – for ﬂow around a sphere 356, 363 – for ﬂow in non-circular tubes 408 – for ﬂow through a packing 409 – – of spheres 409 – for free falling droplets 363 – for laminar ﬂow in circular tubes 408 – for turbulent ﬂow in circular tubes 408 – in boiling mixtures 536 – in compressible ﬂow 433 – in condensation 443 – – of downward ﬂowing vapour 466 – in natural convective boiling 494 – in external forced ﬂow 361 – in ﬂow through channels 407 – in a ﬂuidised bed 402 – in free ﬂow 421 – – on a horizontal cylinder 422 – – on a horizontal plate 421 – – on a inclined plate 422 – – on a sphere 423 – – on a vertical plate 423 – – on a vertical wall 417 – in laminar ﬁlm condensation 446, 484 –, – on a inclined plate 484 –, – on horizontal tubes 449, 484 –, – on a vertical plate 484 –, – on a vertical tube 484 – in laminar ﬂow on a vertical wall 417 – in laminar ﬂow, thermally fully developed 369 –, in the transition region between laminar and turbulent ﬁlm condensation 485 – in turbulent ﬁlm condensation 460, 485 –, – of vapour ﬂowing in tubes 485

Index

–, – on a inclined plate 484 –, – on a vertical ﬂat wall 461, 463 –, – on a vertical plate 484 –, – on a vertical tube 461, 463, 484 – in two-phase ﬂow 528, 535 – – during convective boiling in vertical tubes 536 – – during convective evaporation in horizontal tubes 536 – – during saturated boiling 535 – – during subcooled boiling 535 – through multi-layer walls 33 – through pipes 33 – through walls with extended surfaces 34 Heat transfer coeﬃcient 10, 15, 114, 275 –, average 14 –, local 10 – of radiation 28 –, overall 31, 32 Heat transfer condition 116, 119, 200 – in the diﬀerence method 200, 201, 206, 220 Hemisphere 548, 553 Henry coeﬃcient 251, 253 Henry’s law 93 Heterogeneous ﬂow 523 Heterogeneous model 526 Homogeneous ﬂow 522, 523 Homogeneous model 524 Hookeian behaviour 296 Hookeian body 296 Hour angle 600 Ideal viscous ﬂuid 295 Immiscible liquid 445 Incident intensity 559, 560 –, spectral 557, 559, 560 Indiﬀerence point 336 Inert gas 454 Inertia forces 311, 414 Infrared radiation 547 Initial and boundary condition problem Initial condition 113, 162, 251 Injected substances 470 Instability of the explicit diﬀerence method 197, 198 –, numerical 197 Insulator, electrical 588, 588 Integral condition for energy 338 – for mass transfer 338 – for momentum 338 Integral methods 337 Intensity, incident 559, 560

143

Index

729

–, incident spectral 557, 559, 560 –, spectral 549, 550, 553, 557, 581, 580 –, total 551, 552, 553, 581, 581 Interface area per volume 98 Interfacial tension 444 Internal energy of a ﬂowing ﬂuid 297 Internal forced ﬂow 364 Inverse transformation 146, 148, 149, 152 –, correspondences for 145, 147, 148 –, term by term 148, 150 Inversion 412 IR radiation 547 Irradiance 557, 559, 560 – of diﬀuse solar radiation 609, 610 – of direct solar radiation at the ground 607 – of extraterrestrial solar radiation 599 – of global radiation 609, 610 –, spectral 558, 559, 560, 563 –, – as a result of gas radiation 642 –, – of direct solar radiation at the ground 607 –, – of extraterrestrial solar radiation 599, 599, 607 Irradiation 557 –, absorbed part of 560 –, radiation quantities of 557, 557 Isothermal hollow enclosure 567, 570, 619, 623 Isothermal surface 619 Isotherms 3 Isotropic material 4

–, –, correspondences for 145, 147, 148 –, –, term by term 148, 150 –, object function of 145 Laplace’s diﬀerential equation 113, 136 Law from Beer 601, 639 – from Blasius 525, 526, 527 – from Bouguer 601, 639 – from Fick 71, 245, 247, 249 – –, second 251, 474 – from Fourier 4, 11, 108, 304 – from Henry 93 – from Kirchhoﬀ 26, 566, 569, 582 – from Planck 571, 574 – from Raoult 94 – from Stefan-Boltzmann 577 – from Stokes 401 L´evˆeque solution 376 Lewis number 86, 279, 326 Lewis numbers of gas mixtures 86 Lewis relationship 326, 455 Lewis’ equations 86 Light 546 – scattering 604 –, velocity of 546, 571, 591 Liquid, immiscible 445 Liquid droplets 363 Liquid superheating 487 Local total condensation 477, 480 Lockhart-Martinelli method 526, 528 – parameter 526 Longitudinal pitch 358

Kirchhoﬀ’s function 567, 570 Kirchhoﬀ’s law 26, 566, 569, 582 Kronecker-δ 291

Mach number 316, 426, 429 Magnetic ﬁeld constant 591 Mass balance 246, 247, 282 – for multicomponent mixtures 284, 309 – for pure substances 282 Mass diﬀusion 107, 242, 251 – equation 242 –, steady-state 254, 258 –, – with catalytic surface reaction 254 –, – with homogeneous reaction 258 –, transient 262 –, – in a semi-inﬁnite solid 263 –, – with one-dimensional mass ﬂow 264 Mass expansion coeﬃcient 423 Mass fraction 67 –, dimensionless 345 Mass, optical 602 –, – of the atmosphere 602 –, –, relative 603 Mass quality 467, 489, 518 Mass transfer 65

Lambert radiator 556, 583 –, grey 585, 611, 612 Lambert’s cosine law 555, 556, 585, 588 Laminar boundary layer 336 Laminar ﬁlm 446, 484 Laminar ﬂow 312, 331 –, hydrodynamically fully developed 365 –, thermally fully developed 367, 369 Laminar sublayer 334, 334, 349, 351 Laplace constant 498 – for air bubbles 498 Laplace operator 111 Laplace parameter 144 Laplace transform 144, 145, 147 –, diﬀerential equation for the 146, 148 Laplace transformation 144, 148, 173, 187 –, inverse 146, 148, 149, 152

730

Index

– at a catalyst surface 256 –, convective 77, 256, 275, 443 – in external ﬂow 361 – in a ﬂuidised bed 402 – in free ﬂow 423 – in rectiﬁcation 475 –, overall 65, 92 –, single side 84 –, two-ﬁlm theory of 92 Mass transfer apparatus 94 Mass transfer coeﬃcient 77, 275 Mass transfer column 98 Mass transfer theories 81 Material, isotropic 4 –, wet 84 Material balance 95 – for the vapour in condensation 481 – of a condenser 481 Material properties, constant 210 – of solids 112 –, temperature dependent 22, 116, 208, 212, 451 Maximum heat ﬂux 502, 503, 511, 534 Medium, non-isotropic 4 –, quiescent 242 Melting of a solid 180 Mesh size 195 Microconvection 506 Mirrorlike reﬂection 565, 635 Mixing length 333 – theory 332, 333 Mixing temperature, adiabatic 13 Mixture, binary 285, 424, 473 –, multicomponent 284, 287, 300, 309 Mixtures, enthalpy of 306 Modulus of the diﬀerence method 196, 208, 210 Moisture content 84 Molar ﬂow 248 Molar ﬂux 248 Molar mass, average 68 Molar production ﬂux 248 Mole fraction 67 –, average 76 Molecular diﬀusion 66 Momentum balance 286 – porous bodies 384 Momentum equation 324, 413 Multicomponent mixtures 284, 287, 300, 309 Multiple reﬂection 595, 609 Navier-Stokes equations

296, 296, 313, 317

Net radiation ﬂow 619, 623 Net radiation method 623 Newton’s second law of mechanics 286 Newtonian behaviour 296 Newtonian ﬂuid 295 –, incompressible 308 Non-circular tubes 356, 362, 408 Non-condensable gases 454 Non-isotropic medium 4 Normal stresses 290 Nucleate boiling 488, 529 – general equation for 509 – in a horizontal bank of smooth or ﬁnned tubes 510 – on horizontal copper tubes 510 – of water 507, 509 –, transition to 528 Nuclei formation, heterogeneous 494 –, homogeneous 494 Nukijama curve 500, 502 Number of transfer units 47 Numerical solution of heat conduction problems 194 – of transient heat conduction 143 Nusselt number 17, 119, 325, 358 –, end value of 371, 376, 378 –, mean 20, 325, 348, 352, 355 Nusselt numbers – in laminar tubular ﬂow 378 – in laminar ﬂow, thermally fully developed 367, 372 Nusselt’s ﬁlm condensation theory 446, 460 –, deviations from 450 –, – for subcooled condensate 452 –, – for superheated vapour 453 –, – for temperature dependent material properties 451, 453 –, – for wave formation on the ﬁlm surface 451 Oberbeck-Boussinesq approximation 417 Object function 145 Ohmic heating 109 Operating characteristic 48, 49, 64 – for laterally mixed crossﬂow 60 – of a cocurrent heat exchanger 51 – of a countercurrent heat exchanger 50, 51, 52 Operating line for an absorber 100 – of a boiler 504, 504 Operating point of a boiler 504 Optical mass 602 – of the atmosphere 602

Index

–, relative 603 Optical thickness 638, 639, 647 Overall heat transfer 31 – coeﬃcient 31, 32 – resistance 32, 33, 37, 38 – – of a ﬁnned wall 37 – through multi-layer walls 33 – through pipes 33 – through walls with extended surfaces Overall mass transfer 65, 92 – coeﬃcient 94 Ozone 603, 605 Ozone layer, hole in 605 Packed bed 364, 380, 400, 409 Packed column 95, 98, 381 Packing 95, 409 – of spheres 409 – –, cubic 382 – –, irregular 382 Parallelepiped 175 – with adiabatic surface 175 Partial condensation 477 Partial condenser 473 Particle reference system 69, 249 Particle velocity 400 P´eclet number 21, 320 Penetration depth of temperature ﬂuctuations 160 Penetration theory 87 Phase 1 Phase interface 98 –, temperature at the 477, 479 Phase transition number 182 Photon 546, 548 Pin 35, 129 Planck constant 546, 571 Planck’s radiation law 571, 574 Plate, ﬂat 7, 336, 345 –, ﬂat, with longitudinal ﬂow 275, 361 –, horizontal 421 –, inclined 422 –, vertical 423 Plate heat exchanger 43 Plug ﬂow 514, 515, 516, 529 Poiseuille parabola 364 Polar angle 549 –, of the sun 599, 600, 603 Pool boiling 500 Porous bodies 384 Pore eﬀectiveness factor 261 Power, dissipated 109 –, total 299

34

731

Power density 109, 188, 298, 301 –, constant 122 –, temperature dependent 198 –, time dependent 188 Power product 17 Prandtl analogy 349, 351 Prandtl number 20, 320 –, turbulent 350 Pressure, average 291 –, thermodynamic 291 Pressure diﬀusion 67 Pressure drop in two-phase ﬂow 520 –, acceleration 522 –, frictional 521, 523, 525 –, geodetic 522 Prism 175 Production density 284 Production rate 246 Product solution 163 – for multi-dimensional temperature ﬁelds 175 Promoters 470 Protective radiation shields 633 Pure absorptivity 596 –, spectral 594 Pure crossﬂow 57, 60, 62 Pure substances 282, 297 Pure transmissivity 596 –, spectral 594 Quality 467, 489, 518 –, real 520 –, thermodynamic 519 –, volumetric 518 Quantities 547 –, directional spectral 547, 548, 549 –, directional total 547 –, hemispherical spectral 547 –, hemispherical total 547, 549 Quantum theory 546, 570 Radiation 547 –, absorption of 25, 559 –, black body 569, 569, 571, 574 – constants 571 – from soot 654 –, global 609 –, hollow enclosure 567, 568, 569 –, infrared 547 – of gases 637 – pathway in mirrorlike reﬂection 635, 636 – receiver 620, 624 –, reﬂection of 564

732

–, scattered 601 –, solar 563, 564, 597 –, –, diﬀuse 601, 608 –, –, direct 601, 608 –, –, extraterrestrial 598, 599 – source 558, 620, 624 –, thermal 25 –, transmitted 593 –, ultraviolet 547 Radiation properties of real bodies 580 – of metals 591 Radiation quantities 547 – of emission 551, 553 – of irradiation 557, 559 Radiation shields 633 Radiative energy 547, 549 Radiative equilibrium 620 Radiative exchange 27, 612 – between black bodies 619 – between grey Lambert radiators 622 –, equation system for 630 –, equivalent electric circuit diagram for 626 – factor 626, 627, 628, 629 – in complicated cases 654 – in an enclosure 624, 628 – in furnaces 654 – in gas ﬁlled enclosures 650 – – surrounded by non-isothermal walls 654 – in a hollow cylinder 631 Radiative ﬂow 548, 549 –, absorbed part of 562 Radiative power 548 –, absorbed part of 561 Radiator, diﬀuse 555, 584 –, diﬀuse and grey 584 –, grey 28, 584, 584 –, Lambert 556, 583 Radiosity of a surface 623, 626, 630, 652 Raoult’s law 94 Rate constant 255 Rayleigh equation 481 Rayleigh scattering 604, 607 Reaction 110 –, catalytic surface 254 –, chemical 110, 187, 285, 380, 398 –, ﬁrst order 255 –, heterogeneous 254, 256 –, homogeneous 254, 258 –, n-th order 255 –, nuclear 110, 187 – rate 259, 285 Reactor, catalytic 254, 254 –, ﬂuidised bed 402

Index

Real quality 520 Reciprocity rule for view factors 614, 619 Recovery factor 430 Rectiﬁcation 95 – column 96 –, continuous 97 Rectifying column 97 Recuperator 45 Reduction in spectral intensity 638 – of heat ﬂow in condensation 476 Reference temperature 434 Reﬂection 564 –, diﬀuse 565, 622, 635 –, mirrorlike 565, 635 – of radiation 564 –, specular 635 Reﬂectivity 26, 564, 582 –, bidirectional 565 –, directional spectral 566, 583 –, directional total 566 –, hemispherical spectral 566 –, hemispherical total 566 –, spectral Fresnel’s 595 Reﬂux condenser 475 Refractive index 546, 574, 587 –, complex 587, 590 – of electrical insulators 588, 588 – of metals 591, 591 Regenerator 44, 45 Region, fully turbulent 336 –, transition 336, 352, 462, 485 Regression analysis 506 Reradiating wall 620, 624 Resistance – factor 372, 379, 380, 400, 401, 524 – heating 109 – line 504, 504 –, speciﬁc electrical 109, 588, 591 – to heat conduction 6, 7, 32, 139, 141 – to heat transfer 32, 38 – to mass transfer 92, 94 Reynolds analogy 326, 348, 351 Reynolds number 19, 311, 401 –, critical 312 –, inﬂuence of 310 Reynolds’ stresses 329, 330, 332 Reynolds’ transport theorem 280, 282 Saturated boiling 530, 535 Scattering 600 –, aerosol 600, 604, 608 – in the atmosphere 601 –, light 604

Index

–, molecular 604 –, Rayleigh 604, 607 Schmidt number 80 –, turbulent 351 Semi-annular ﬂow 489, 516 Semi-inﬁnite bodies in contact 156 Semi-inﬁnite solid 151, 152, 153 Separation of variables 143, 163 Separation parameter 164 Separation point 353 Setting of concrete 188 Shah equation 467 Shape coeﬃcient 141 – factor 141, 142 Shear stress 290 – at the phase interface 464 Shell-and-tube heat exchanger 42 Sherwood number 80, 325 –, mean 85, 325 Similarity solution 418 Similarity theory 16 Singularity method 137 Sky radiation 609 Slip 519 – factor 519, 522 Slug ﬂow 489, 515, 516 Smog risk 413 Smooth tube bundle 358, 363 Solar constant 579, 598 Solar energy technology 598 Solar energy use 597 Solar radiation 563, 564, 597 – at the ground 606 –, attenuation of 600 –, diﬀuse 601, 608 –, direct 601, 608 –, extraterrestrial 598, 599 Solar time 600 Solid angle 550 Solid angle element 549 Solid angle unit 550 Solidiﬁcation 179 – in a hollow sphere 186 – inside of a tube 186 – of ﬂat layers 180 – outside of a tube 185 –, quasi-steady approximation of 183 Solidiﬁcation time 182, 184 – for cylindrical layers 185, 186 – for ﬂat layers 184 – for spherical layers 186 Solidiﬁcation speed 181, 186 Solubility of gases in liquids 252

733

– of gases in solids 253 Solution of linear systems using the Gauss-Seidel-method 218 – using the SOR-method 218 Sound, velocity of 316, 317, 426, 428 Speciﬁc surface area 259 Spectral absorptivity 560, 583 –, directional 560, 561, 583, 583 –, hemispherical 561, 583 Spectral emissivity 581, 642 –, directional 581, 583, 583 –, – normal to the surface 588, 590, 591 –, – of CO2 641 –, – of electrical insulators 588, 589 –, – of gases 640 –, – of metals 591 –, hemispherical 581, 583 –, – of electrical insulators 590 – of a gas sphere 647, 649 – of a gas volume 641 Spectral intensity 549, 550, 553, 557, 581, 580 –, incident 557, 559, 560 – of a black body 568, 571 – of hollow enclosure radiation 567, 567, 568 Spectral irradiance 558, 559, 560, 563 Spectral reﬂectivity 566 –, directional 566, 583 –, hemispherical 566 Spectral quantities 547 –, directional 547, 548, 549 –, hemispherical 547 Spectrum of electromagnetic waves 546, 547 Specular reﬂection 635 Sphere 7, 423 –, ﬂow around a 356, 363 –, gas 646, 647 Spheres, packing of 381 –, cubic packing of 382 –, irregular packing of 382 Spherical wall 8 Sphericity 399 Spray ﬂow 489, 514, 515, 516, 529 Stability condition 197, 201 – criteria 210, 211, 215 Stability in boiling 502 – at maximum heat ﬂux 505 Stagger 358 Stagnant boiling 487, 488, 500 Stanton number 21, 22, 349, 350 –, mean 351 Stefan-Boltzmann constant 25, 577 Stefan-Boltzmann law 577 Stefan correction factor 83, 86, 455

734

Index

Stefan number 182 Stefan problem 180, 186 Stere radians 550 Stokes’ hypothesis 296 Stokes’ law 401 Straight ﬁn 35, 134 Strain tensor 293, 294 Stratiﬁcation 412 Stratiﬁed ﬂow 331, 515 – in horizontal tubes 485 Stream function 343 Stress component 290 – tensor 288, 290, 290 – vector 287, 289 Stresses, Reynolds’ 329, 330, 332 –, normal 290 –, shear 290 –, – at the phase interface 464 –, tangential 290 –, turbulent 329 Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problem 164, 165 Subcooled boiling 529, 535 Subcooled liquid 529 Subcooling of condensate 452 Sublayer, laminar 334, 334, 349, 351 –, viscous 336 Summation rule for view factors 615 Summertime 600 Sun, emissive power of the 579 –, polar angle of the 599, 600, 603 –, surface temperature of the 579, 598 Superheated vapour 453, 529 Superheating vapour 452 Superposition of free and forced ﬂow 425 – of heat sources and sinks 137 Surface, adiabatic 114 –, diﬀuse radiating 551, 556 –, extended 34, 35 –, isothermal 619 –, radiosity of a 623, 626, 630, 652 Surface area, speciﬁc 259 Surface element, irradiated 558 Surface evaporation 487 Surface force 287, 288 Surface reaction, catalytic 254 Surface renewal theory 87 Surface temperature 114 – of the sun 579, 598 System, quiescent 242 Tangential stresses Temperature 2

290

–, adiabatic mixing 13, 367, 370, 375 –, adiabatic wall 429 – at the boundary 199, 206 – at the ﬁn base 36 – at the phase interface 477, 479 –, Celsius 2 –, dimensionless 118, 345 –, free ﬂow 12 –, reference 434 –, thermodynamic 2, 426, 550 –, transformed 116, 117 –, wet bulb 88, 91 Temperature changes in a cylinder 171 – in heat exchangers 47, 48 – in a plate 171 – in a sphere 171 – in the cooling of a steel plate 204, 207 –, periodic 158 Temperature-concentration diagram for a binary mixture 474 Temperature dependence of the density 22 – of the material properties 22, 116, 451 Temperature diﬀerence 2 –, characteristic 16 –, logarithmic mean 54 –, mean 49 –, – of a cocurrent heat exchanger 54 –, – of a countercurrent heat exchanger 54 Temperature drop 33 – at the interface between two bodies 114 Temperature ﬁeld 3, 108 – after a heat explosion 193 – around a linear heat source 192 –, diﬀerential equation for the 107, 110, 111 – in a compressible ﬂow 426 – in a semi-inﬁnite solid 156 –, steady-state 112, 136, 216 Temperature ﬁelds, planar and spatial 136 –, similar 117 –, transient multi-dimensional 213 Temperature ﬂuctuation 158 –, daily 158 – in combustion engines 158 –, penetration depth of 160 –, seasonal 158 Temperature gradient 3 Temperature inversion 412 Temperature jump at the interface between two bodies 115 – of the surface temperature 152 Temperature oscillation 160 Temperature pattern at the interface between

Index

two bodies 115 – in ﬁns and pins 129 – in ﬂowing ﬂuids 11 – in a rod 125, 128 – in semi-inﬁnite bodies 157, 160 – in straight ﬁns 132 – in walls 8, 9 Temperature proﬁle 5 – around a linear heat source 192, 193 – around a point heat source 191 – at the wall 11 – for small Biot number 178 – in a cylinder of ﬁnite length 176 – in a cylindrical wall 8 – in a ﬂat wall 8, 9 – in an inﬁnitely long cylinder 170 – in a parallelepiped 175 – in a prism 175 – in a rod 125, 128 – in a sphere 170 – in a spherical wall 8 – in compressible ﬂow 429 – – of ideal gas 432, 433 – in condensation of vapour mixtures 474 – in free ﬂow 414, 420 – in heating or cooling of a plate 166, 173 – of a thermally and hydrodynamically developing ﬂow 377 Temperature variation, normalised 51 Temperature waves in semi-inﬁnite bodies 160 Tensor, deformation velocity 294 –, strain 293, 294 –, stress 288, 290, 290 –, trace of 291 –, unit 291 Theory of electromagnetic waves 587, 589, 591 Thermal boundary layer 276, 277, 319, 321 – of multicomponent mixtures 321 Thermal conductance 6 Thermal conductivity 4, 6, 18, 37 –, average 6, 8, 37 –, harmonic mean of 212 –, temperature dependent 123 – tensor 304 –, turbulent 330 Thermal diﬀusion 67 Thermal diﬀusivity 20, 111, 112 –, turbulent 330 Thermal entry ﬂow 372 Thermal expansion coeﬃcient 415 Thermal penetration coeﬃcient 153, 157

735

Thermal power 2 Thermal radiation 25, 545, 546 –, emission of 548 Thermal resistance 6 Thermally and hydrodynamically developing ﬂow 377 Thermodynamic pressure 291 Thermodynamic quality 519 Thermodynamic temperature 2, 426, 550 Thickness, ﬁlm 448 –, optical 638, 639, 647 Thomson’s equation 492 Time, central European 600 –, contact 87 –, dimensionless 118 Total absorptivity, directional 561, 584 –, hemispherical 561, 564, 584 Total condensation, local 477, 480 Total emissivity 581, 642 –, directional 581, 584 –, – normal to the surface 593 –, hemispherical 581, 584 –, – normal to the surface 589, 590 –, – of CO2 644 –, – of electrical insulators 590 –, – of gases 642, 645 –, – of H2 O 645 –, – of metals 590, 593 – of a gas volume 642 Total force 288 Total intensity 551, 552, 553, 581, 581 Total power 299 Total quantities 547 –, directional 547 –, hemispherical 547, 549 Total reﬂectivity, directional 566 –, hemispherical 566 Transfer capability of a heat exchanger 46, 48, 55 – in counter and cocurrent ﬂow 51, 55 –, dimensionless 47, 54 Transition region 336, 352 – between laminar and turbulent condensation 462, 485 Transition to nucleate boiling 528 Transmissivity 26 –, directional spectral 640 –, pure 596 –, –, spectral 594 –, spectral 593, 601 –, – as a result of Rayleigh scattering 604 –, – of the absorption by ozone 606 –, – of the absorption by water vapour 606

736

–, – of the atmosphere 602, 603, 604 –, – of glass 594 Transparent body 593 Transport, convective 444 –, diﬀusion 444 Transverse pitch 357 Tridiagonal system 205, 206 Tube arrangement 357 – for a bundle of smooth tubes 364 – in crossﬂow 357 – –, aligned 357, 358 – –, staggered 357, 358 Tube bank, horizontal 450 Tube bundle condenser 459, 468 Tube bundles in crossﬂow 357 Tube in crossﬂow 353, 358 Turbidity formula 604 Turbulence inﬂuence on heat transfer 327 – on mass transfer 327 Turbulence models 328 Turbulent core 335 Turbulent diﬀusion 66 – coeﬃcient 330 Turbulent diﬀusional ﬂux 329 Turbulent ﬁlm 460, 466, 485 Turbulent ﬂow 312, 331, 348 –, boundary layer equations for 329 – in circular tubes 379 – near solid walls 331 –, wall law for 332 Turbulent heat ﬂux 329 Turbulent region, fully 336 Turbulent stresses 329 Turbulent thermal conductivity 330 Turbulent thermal diﬀusivity 330 Turbulent viscosity 330 Two-ﬁlm theory 92 Two layer model 349 Two-phase ﬂow 513 – in a heated channel 518 – in a horizontal, heated tube 516 – in a horizontal, unheated tube 515 – in a vertical, heated tube 490, 529 – in a vertical, unheated tube 514 –, heat transfer regions in 528 –, heterogeneous 523 –, heterogeneous model of 526 –, homogeneous 522, 523 –, –, dynamic viscosity of 525 –, –, frictional pressure drop in 525 –, homogeneous model of 524 –, pressure drop in 520 –, –, acceleration 522

Index

–, –, frictional 521, 523 –, –, geodetic 522 Two-phase mixture, density of Types of condensation 444 – of heat exchanger 41 – of heat transfer 486 – of mass transfer 65

521

Ultraviolet radiation 547 Unit, astronomical 598 Unit tensor 291 UV radiation 547 Vapour bubble, spherical 491 Vapour bubbles, formation of 491 –, frequency of 498, 499, 500 Vapour content, volumetric 518 Velocity, average mass 69 –, average molar 69, 243 –, ﬂuctuation 328 –, friction 332 –, gravitational 69, 243 –, minimum ﬂuidisation 399 – of light 546, 571, 591 – of sound 316, 317, 426, 428 –, particle 400 Velocity boundary layer 315, 315, 318 Velocity distribution in the turbulent boundary layer 334 Velocity ﬂuctuations 327 Velocity proﬁle 316 – in compressible ﬂow 429 – – of ideal gas 432 – in free ﬂow 414, 420 –, laminar 331, 365 –, logarithmic 334 – of a thermally and hydrodynamically developing ﬂow 377 – on a ﬂat plate 345 –, turbulent 331, 365 View factor 613, 614, 617 –, modiﬁed 621 View factors, calculation of 615 –, collection of 616, 617 –, reciprocity rule for 614, 619 –, summation rule for 615 Viscosity 18 –, bulk 291, 302 –, dynamic 296 –, – of homogeneous two-phase ﬂow 525 –, kinematic 20 –, turbulent 330 Viscous dissipation 303, 320

Index

Visible light region 546 Void fraction 259, 381, 382 Volumetric quality 518 Volumetric vapour content 518 Wall, cylindrical 8 –, ﬂat 5, 8, 9 –, multi-layer 33 –, reradiating 620, 624 –, spherical 8 Wall condition 340 Wall law for turbulent ﬂow 332 Wall superheating, ideal 540 Wall temperature, calculation of 33 –, adiabatic 429 Wave formation on ﬁlm surfaces 451 Wavelength 159, 545, 546 Wavelength distribution of radiative

737

energy 547, 549, 550 Waves, electromagnetic 545 Wavy ﬂow 515, 516 Wet bulb temperature 88, 91 Wet material 84 Wetting 445 Wetting media 537 Wetting tension 445 Wien’s displacement law 573 Winding factor 259 Window, atmospheric 605 Winkler process 398 Wispy-annular ﬂow 514 Zone 620, 630 –, energy balance of a Zone method 654

623