This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
0. a a
Interchanging the order of integration by Fubini's theorem with the subsequent
1 - ..,� .
change t = s + e(x - s) of variable we obtain I
0, we have respectively
f
]aa+ r = f(,B) (x - a) a+ P- 1 , a E C, ( a + /3) t"
Iba- T = t"
f(,B)
r( a + ,8) (b - x) a
+P - 1
'
a E C'
(2.44) (2.45)
These formulae adjoin (2.26) and may be proved by direct evaluation. 2. In the more general case
0. Then __
(2.48)
(2.49)
=
where 1/J( z) is the Euler psi-function ( 1 .67). Indeed after the change of variable in the integral
1a+a
· -al-a+a+f3 +a If> = -nVa+ a 1{3a+ 'P = -nVa+ - a ra+ -a ra+ (2.67) Ia+ This last is valid in view of {2.65) because Re( -a) > 0 and Re(a + ,8) > 0. Applying then (2.57), we obtain {2.65) from {2.67) in the case Rea < as well. 2) In the case Re,B < 0, Re a > 0 we have by the assumption that If> = 1�:1/;, where 1/J E L t , so r::/3 = r::/3 I�: .,P . Since Re(a + ,8 + (-,8)) > 0, we obtain from here according to case 1) that 1::/3/f> = 1:+ .,P = r:+ �:If> = r:+ I�f3 +
- of purely imaginary order; 3) there exist a summable derivatives v�: if> and v�; /3/f> (in the sense of Definition X
(z)
.
48
CHAPTER 1. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES ON AN INTERVAL
(2.65) is replaced by the relation (2.68)
=
where n [-Re,B] + 1 and Relation (2.68) is derived from (2.60) with the aid of (2.65). The property (2.65) of fractional integrals and derivatives is called a semigroup property. This is connected with a notion of a semigroup of operators. We give the corresponding definition, but for simplicity we let the parameter be real.
a
one-parameter family of linear bounded operators a Banach space X is said to be a semigroup if
Definition 2.5. A
Ta , a � 0, in (2.69)
To
0.
Let cp(x) E H\ � � 0. Then the fractional integral I�+
0, has the following form
Theorem 3.2.
(3 .6)
where m is a maximal integer such that m < �' and
§ 3. THE FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF HO LDER AND SUMMABLE FUNCTIONS
,P (z) E
{
H>.+cr
H �+ a , l
if � + a is not an integer or if � and a are integers if � + a is an integer but � and a are not integers.
57
.
Theorem 3.2 is deduced from Theorem 3.1 if we take into account that the function
] m ,P(z) = r(la) J [
. and g(a) = g(b) = 0 in accordance with Remark
(b - x) - " g(z) where
3.1. We are to prove
that
X
( )
G(z) = f bb -- zt a
II
g(t)dt +a (z - t) l -a E n>- ' X
G(a) = G(b) = 0. Since I G(z)l � c J(t - a)>-(z - t) a - l dt as x --+ a, a the condition G(a) = 0 becomes obvious. If z --+ b, then
and that
I G(x) l � (b - z)"
then
b-a
J t>- - "(t + z - bt- 1 dt.
b- x
Hence after the change of variable t = ( b - z)e we have
I G(z) l � (b - z) >.+a
,_ _ b-'i'
J1 t>.-v (t - l )a- l dt
� (b - X) >. + a f t " - >. (t dt- 1 ) 1 -a 1 00
and so
G(b) = 0 .
To prove the Holder property of the function
G(x) we represent
§ 3. THE FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF HO LDER AND SUMMABLE FUNCTIONS
61
it in the form :c
:c
f ((bb - x)" - (b -l-t)" g(t)dt G(x) = f (xg-(t)dt + - t)" (x - t) a tp-a a
Gt (x)
a
I Gt l n A+ar � ciiYIInA by Theorem 3.1.
Here E H �+a and x + h E ( a, b) for ( z ) we have:
G2
Assuming that
where :c+h
Jl = f (b(b -- t)X "-(xh)"+ h- -(b1)-1t)"- a g (t)dt, :c
J2 = [(b - h -
z " -
)
:c
(b - z)"]
j (b
_
a
:c
(
� ��
t)" (
_
t) '- <> ,
J = f (b - x)"(b --t)(b - t)" [(x + h - t)a- l - (x - t)a- l]g(t)dt. 3
"
a
Using the estimate
lg(t) l � I YI nA (b - t)� and (3.8) we obtain :c+h
I Jt l � c J (x + h - t)a (b - t)�- 1 dt :c
h
= C f ea (b -
X-
h + e ) � - l c.Ie
0
from whence after the change of variable . e = ( b - X - h )s it folloWS that h/(b-:c-h)
I Jtl � c(b - X - h)�+a J 0
s a ( l + s) � - 1 ds.
62
CHAPTER
1. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES ON AN INTERVAL
If b - z - h 5 h , then
[
]
h/(IJ- z - h)
j
I Jt l � c(b - ., - h) �+<> 1 +
.� +"' - 1 ds
1
� chH"' .
But if b - z - h � h , then
J
h/(6-z-h)
I J1 I 5 c(b - z - h)>. +a
s a ds � ch>. +a .
0
For J2 , applying (3.8) again we have
J z
I J2 I � ch(b - z) "- 1
(b - t)>. -v dt (z + h _ t p -a
a
1 _ < - c h(b z ) "-
J( z
(b - t)>.-v dt . z - t ) 1 -a
a
00
Now we change the variable z - t = (b- z)e. Then I J2 1 � ch(b- z) >-+a - 1 I ea- 1 (1 + 0 e>>.-v cJe since II > � + a. Hence, IJ2 1 � ch>- +a . It remains to estimate J3. By substituting t = b - s(b - z) we have
T l l·�-� 1 ·- ·
I Jal � c
(b - o: ) �+ "'
1
l ( l + �., r-· 8 -
b
l
(s - 1)"' - ' ds llgi i H • .
Applying (3.9) we obtain
h
I J3I � cII g II H" ( b - z) >.+a b - z
0-'i' ·-·
J1
1 1 - s" l ds � ch >-+a s "->-(s - 1)2-a
since b - z � h and � + a < 1 . The theorem is thus proved. • b A similar statement for the weight p( z) = ( z - a ) ( - z )" is easily derived from Theorem 3.3. Namely, the following theorem holds.
P
§ 3.
THE FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF HOLDER AND SUMMABLE FUNCTIONS
63
Let 0 < � < 1 and � + a < 1 . The operator 1:+ is bounded from H6(P) into n; + a (p) with p(x) = (x - a)11(b - x)", p. < � + 1, v > � + a.
Theorem 3.3' .
Proof. Let functions
.([a, c] ) , g(a) = 0. Since the functions (pb (x)] - 1 and P a (x)
.([a, c]} and Pa (x) E H>.([c, b]). Then Pa (x)
.([a, c]) and H>.([c, b]) also belongs to H>.([a, b]). I t i s also clear from the above arguments that ll p if 0 < a < 1/p,ex and it evenex- proves to be a continuous (Holderian) function which belongs to n -1/P or n 1/P,11P' , see Definitions 1.6, 1.7, if a > 1/p. The following theorem is known as the Hardy-Littlewood theorem with limiting exponent. Theorem 3.5. If 0 < a < 1, 1 < p < 1/ a, then the fractional integration operator I:+ is bounded from Lp into L9 with q = p/(1 - ap) . Th e proof of this theorem requires more refined methods than those we have used until now. The presentation of the mathematical technique necessary for the proof would take us far aside. Thus we shall give only the proof of a simpler assertion, namely I:+ is bounded from Lp , 1 $ p < 1/a , into Ln where 1 $ r < q = p/( 1 - ap) . We refer the reader interested in the proof of the case r = q, and also in consideration of the cases p = 1 and p = 1/ a not contained in Theorem 3.5 to the bibliographical notes in §§ 4 and 9. See also § 4.2 (notes 3.2, 3.3). In view of (1.3 1) it is sufficient to take r > p. We set £ = {1/r - 1/q)/2. Then 1. • - 0 the equality
0, � ;:::: 0, b > 0 hold. The former is proved by simple estimates after 1/a. 1/p. Firstly we consider the weight p(z) lz - dl"' , a < d b. Theorem 3.11. Let 1 < p < 1/p < a < 1 + 1/p, and 0 < < p - 1 if a < d < b and 0 < < if d b. Then the fractional integration operator I:+ is bounded from L'p (p), p(z) l z - dl 11 into n;;i n( pfp, a - 1 /p) (p1 1P) if f; ap - 1 and into n; - 1fp , 1 fp (p 11P) if ap - 1. fp , r.p(z) l z - dl - "r.po (z), <po E Lp . We are to prove that Proof. Let Theorem 3.10. (t)dt- . 1 = lim la f ( at ) N-oo j ( t) t) l a f (a) j ( -oo �-N Then one may admit locally summable functions v;> (t), not necessarily vanishing at � +T infinity if the behaviour of their means J v;>(t)dt is subjected to certain conditions. 0, {3 > 0. It may be verified in a similar fashion to (2.21). Within the framework of the space Lp (R1 ) ( 5 . 1 5) is valid for such a > 0, {3 > 0 that a + {3 < 1/p - see § 5.2 below in connection with mapping properties of I± in Lp (R1 ) . The fractional integration by parts formulae 00 1, r > 1, 1/p + 1/r = 1 + a. It may be achieved with the aid of Theorem 5.3 analogously to the proof of formula (2.20). The proof of (5. 17) in the case of p-summable fractional derivatives is given in Corollary 2 of Theorem 6.2 below. Equations ( 5 .1 6 ) and (5.17) hold on the half-axis as well. So we have 00 0, excluding the case a = 0, when 0 < Reo: < 1 . In the latter case 0, and 0 < a < analogously treat the case a � 1 based on (5.85). 1 we shall use Marchaud derivatives, instead of V±f, treating them as convergent in the norm of Lp (R1 ) - see (5.60). 0, a bounded operator in Lr(R1 ) for all r � 1. Functions /(z) being sufficiently good, e.g. in C(f , we have 1, is weakly compact, see for example Dunford and Schwartz [1], p.314) . Since any bounded operator is 1 let us take the function r.p E C(f , to be nonnegative and positive on some interval [a , b] . Then for x > b 0, in the case of the specially constructed space of functions 0 for all sufficiently smooth functions, for example, those which are differentiable up to the order n = [Rea) + 1 , and vanish sufficiently rapidly at infinity together with their derivatives. One may verify this n by rewriting V + f as V + f = !f.-a f( ) and applying then ( 7.1 ) and (1.105) . We wish to illustrate the applicability of {7 .1 ) to the evaluation of certain integrals. Namely, we shall prove ( 5.24) with the aid of (7. 1). First let ReJl > 1 in ( 5.24) . Then { 1 ± ix) - "' E L 1 {R1 ) and so (see Theorem 7.1) by (7.1). Equation (7.5) yields = (:���or .1" Flf. 0 and the estimate (7.15) holds, then ( 7. 14) is true for Rep > Po · 0. For such functions we havea: that If./ is also supported on this half-axis. Equation (8.22) is applicable for all with the usual interpretation of the generalized function z�-l in the case Rea: < 0 0, defined by the equality (10+ /, w) (/, I�w), w E <)f., maps the space (<)+ a )' isomorphically onto (<)f.)'. .. ( 1�+ .. - l (J� .. - 2(J� a, a EC a -1 a+ r(J!�) (x-a) P -1 , Re,B>O (x-a)P -1 (a±ep a-�) ' (x±cp-1 r(a+1) (x-a)a �1 (1, 1--y; a+1; arc a±c>O, -yEC ar+ -1 � -1 �-a) ' -1 (x-a)P (b-xp � (�-a) (6-a)1-'Y �1 (,8, 1--y;a+,B; 0::0 -yEC,ar+a<xO, �-1 � � -1 (�-a) (� (6--aa))ar (6 -�)) , Re,B>O, a<xO, ,ar+a±c>O -1 � (�-yEC �-1 z aro+li a) �z±e (a±e)ar(�±e)d ' Re,B>O, a± c>O (�-a)ar 1 J(i'Fc'�+-aJn"C') 2a ' Re a > - 1 , .,/f )� r(a+1/2 (� ± e)ar+1/2 ( a±c>O e�� I'(�)�ar -y(a, ..\x - ..\a)= e�a (x-a)a E1,a +1 ( A.x- ..\a) (x-a)P -1 e�� H!�PJ (x-a)a+P -1 1F1 (,B; a +.B; ,\x-..\a), Re,B>O (x-a)a-1 e2i�� ..;:i(2,\ ) 1 / 2-a (x -a )a-1/2ei�(�+a) Ja-1/2 ( ..\x-,\a), Rea>O j-(1:1:1)/2 (x-a)a sin �(� -a) } { cos�(�-a) 2r(a+1) xhF1 (1 ; a + 1 ; i..\ (x-a)) =F 1F1 (1; a+ 1; - i..\(x-a))] in �v'�-a} ..fi ( '1�) 1/2-a (x-a)(2a+1)/4 { Jar+1f2 (�v'�-a)} esh�v'�-a /ar+t/2 (� .,/� -a) j-(1:1:1)/2 in � �-a) } -1 �( a+ < -1 (x-a)P ecoe �(� -a) ' 2 r a+P X - a) P Re,B>-(1±1)/2 x[tF1 (,B; a + .B; i..\(x-a)) =F 1F1 (,B; a+,B; - i..\ (x-a))] a-1 / 2 { sin(��-�a) } J ( ..\x -,\a) a) in2�(� ..fi } _ a-1 (X a) ecoa2�(z -a) ' (�-a) 2A cos(��-�a) a-1/2 Rea>-(1±1) /2 (� .,/z -a) } �v'�-a} (x - a> -1/2 { cos o ../i ( 'J�) 1 / 2-a (x-a)(2a -1 )/4 { Jar-1/2 ch�v'zIar-1/2(�v'�-a) ln(x-a) � [ln(x-a) +1/1(1)-1/l(a+ 1)] -1 (x-a)P In(x-a) r(J!�) (x- a) a+P -1 [1/I(.B) -1/l(a+.B)+ln(x-a)] , Re,B>O -1 (x-a)P Inm(x-a) (x-a)a+P -1 E (': ) $. ( r(J!�) ) lnm -J:(x-a), J::O. . . Re,B>O, m=1,2, (x-a)"I 2 J, (..\vx-a) (2/..\) a (x-a) (a+v )/2Ja+ 11( ..\vx-a), Rev>-1 ../i (x-a)(2a-3)/ 4 { T) a-1/2 Ja-1/2 ( ..\vx-a)Ya-1/2 (..\vx-a), X Ya-1/2 (2..\vx-a) Rea>O ..fi ( --:r �-a) a-1/2 Ia - 1/2 (,\VX-Ci} (x-a)(2a-3) /4 x-a Ka-1/2 ( ,\VX-Ci} x-a ' X Ka-1/2 (2 ..\VX-Ci} Rea>O (x-a)P - 1 r(J!�) (x-a)a+P -1 2F1 (J.',v ; a+,B; A.x- ..\a), Re,B>O X �1 (I", v; ,8; ..\(x-a)) (x- a)P -1 E ,p((x-a)l") (x-a)a+P -1 E,_, a+p ((x-a)l"), ReJ.'>O, Re,B>O § .x sin .>.x } { cos.>.x e.>.x { sin-yx } COS"'(X 0' ax< b' Re ( a +"'Y ) < 1 � e ± ari/2 (1 ±zz),a _ 1 -a ' Re (�-& - a) > O' wto, - 1 , - 21 . . . �(x-a)a++P -1 , Re P>O ..X -a e>.x , Re ..X > O sin( >.x -ar/2) } ' ..X > O, Rea < 1 ..X -a { cos(.>.x -ar/2) sin(-yx -a tp ) (.>. 2 +-y 2 )<>72 { cos(-yx -atp ) } , O, ")' > O e.b 01 Re (2a - v) <3/2 .,. (.>. ..rx) .>.> 0 1 Re (2a-v)< 3/2 } ( X2 ) a x 1. But in the case p = 1 the space £ 1 {0, b) should be contracted by the condition { l in xl + 1)g(x) E L 1 {0, b). This fact follows from the representation of the operator cp 0. Part II. Necessity. Let 1/l(x) be such that 1/l(x) = Ig+ x�-' f(x), f(x) E Lp (O, b), 1 :::; p and p(1 + Re c ) > 1. Then according to the necessity proved above there exists a function 9 E Lp , .(O, b) such that (10.8) is valid. By the sufficiency proved above for such a function 9( x) there exists another function 9 1 E Lp (O, b) such that the relation x£ 1g+ 9(x) = 1g+ x£9 1 (x) similar to (10.8) is valid. Excluding 1g+ 9(x) from these relations we obtain the analogue of 1 and p(1 + ,82 - a 1 - a2 ) > 1 and hence Lemma 10.1 can be applied to the operators xf31 Ig.;_- !31 and xf32 Ig.f. - /32 . This yields the statements of the theorem in the cases j = 3 and j = 2. Let now the conditions in A4 be given. Then in view of Theorem operator F is bounded in Lp (O, b) . Indeed we set 1 when p = 1 is violated but it is not essential. All the above conditions lead to the conditions of the case j = 1 of Theorem 10.4. Similar conditions in the case j = 7 of Theorem 10.2 yield the conditions in the case j = 2 of Theorem 10.4. While considering the relations in (10.23)-(10.25) we use similar arguments and prove that the above correspondence of conditions is totally repeated. We also note that some inequalities which naturally follow from the other inequalities are excluded. While studying the cases j = 9, . . . , 16 in Table 10.2 we use {10.32) and afterwards -the- lcases j .= 5, 6, 7, 8, 3, 4, 1, 2 of this Table but relative to the function b, t-X 1r -ctgp.1r <(;�l;: • , if a < X < b (11.4) (0 < Rep. < 1); (S 0 and is zero for x < 0, is also a, 0. Representations for the compositions vg xa I'!_x- a and xa v �x-a I�+ via the singular operator S and certain operators of the form (1 .44) with a homogeneous kernel were obtained by Kober [4, p.450] . These representations may be derived by means of ( 11 .27) -( 1 1 .29) and (3.15 ) -( 3.16) . It was also shown in the cited paper ( p.449) that the operators x -a I�+ and I�x-a have the same range if they are considered on the space Lp (R� ). 12.1. The semigroup property {12.17) for Feller potentials is valid in the presented general form - for M:1 ," 1 , Me2 ," 2 with arbitrary coefficients u; , 11; - in the case a + {3 < 1 and is in general meaningless if a + {3 = 1. Under the special choice of u 2 , 112 ( with given u l t 11 1 } the semigroup property holds in the case a + {3 = 1 as well: M:,v M�;-_.� cp = Jiv - ex) cp, 0 < a < 1, for sufficiently good functions cp(x). 1 2.3. The operator (12.44) is positively defined: was studied. It was shown in particular that o ' A 0 and {3 > 0. Let us consider the question as to what operator is inverse to I'; , i.e. what is the corresponding form of fractional differentiation to be. We have formally - 1, p :1 1. We may go on and call any convolution operator ( 1 9.3) with J( a ) I2h = A + B since one may take 0 < h < 1rj2. For the first term we have 11" 0, - 11' .. (x). Proof. For definiteness we choose a left-hand sided variant of the fractional differentiation, namely the sign +. Let the derivative in (20.7) exist convergent as .. ( [a, b]), 0 � � � 1. If 0 < a < 1 and {3 � 0, then U:f cp)(z) = ;�:� Cl>p, a (z) + 1/> (z), . ( b - x ) � , then direct evaluation shows that � b z (t-aP)-i (x - t )"'- 1 lnfJ -L dt ...J. 0 ((b - x)>. + a ln.B -1- ) (pr�•fJ I b-z z-t a+ p·- 1mT )(x) = ( r(ar fa (b-t ) + , as x -+ b. Hence, we obtain that f = 1::/ p- 1 O 0 1 were considered. We note that in the cited paper there is a misunderstanding: instead of the integral a > c, where 1/l(x) is the same as in the mentioned Corollary. See also note 18.14 in this Subsection, the last part of which is also relevant to this question. As for the significance of such connections, we can refer to the paper by Nahushev and Salahi tdinov [1] stimulated by applications to non-local boundary problems for differential equations. 7. The answer was given in § 4.2, note 2.12. We refer also to § 17.2, note 12.6 and § 29.2, note 25.19 for answers to some questions put by Prof. E.R. Love at the 3rd International Conference on Fractional Calculus (Tokyo, Nihon University). a k . Introducing the notation ek = (0, . . . , 0, 1, 0, . . . , 0} for the k-th unit ---..--- a k , k = 1, 2, . . . , n, will be called 0 for k = 1, 2, . . . , we have SO t 0 and z 2 > 0 and ka (z) = 0 if Z t < 0 or z2 < 0; b) instead of (6.23) we arrive at the representation 00 00 2, and (18.40) with V�� ;:l1 )/ 2 (--;f; ) (n - 1 )/ in the case of an odd n. Proof. Since by Lemma 25.1 1 2 , we obtain (25.14'). 0, Re,B > 0. 0 for lx l < 1. Then (Ja (z)dz = J ( le' l i€n ) - 01/J (€)d{, (25.73) R• - • , a. Then (26.98) and (26.98') 0 with cp E Lp(Rn+l) converges absolutely almost everywhere if 0 a n + 2 and 1 � p (n + 2)/a and the operator Ha is bounded from Lp(Rn+ l ) into L9(Rn+ l ) , where 1 p ( n + 2)/a and (n + 2)p/(n + 2 - ap). We do not give the proof of this theorem, but see the references in § 29.1. Similarly t o the spaces l0(Lv) of Riesz potentials or the spaces G0(Lv) of < 0 and . Then ra I = £-0 lim Tea I = 0, and 2(a/2] in the case of a non-centered difference was noted by Samko (17) (1976). The case 0 < a < 2 when one may take I = 1 , was known earlier - Stein [1] (1961) and Lizorkin [6, p. 85] (1970) . The way to avoid the phenomenon of the annihilation (26.18) by means of the choice I = a in the case of a non-centered difference was suggested by Samko (17) (1976) . Fractional differentiation in a given direction was considered by Wilmes [1 , 2], who defined it in Fourier transforms without realization in untransformed functions and gave (26.24). Notes to § 26.3. The �ults of this subsection, except Theorem 26.31, were obtained by Samko (17) (1976). The latter theorem was proved by Rubin [26] (1987). Notes to § 26.4. Hypersingular integrals with homogeneous characteristics appeared in the papers of Wheeden [1]-(4] (1967-1969). The characteristics can be found in Fisher [7) (1973). However, hypersingular integrals with a � 2 were introduced in all these papers via regularization (subtracting the Taylor sum), and not by taking finite differences. In the form (26.47) hypersingular integrals were considered in Samko (21] (1977), (26] (1978) and [28] (1980) in the case of homogeneous characteristics, and in Samko (18] (1976) and [20] (1977) in the case of a non-homogeneous characteristics. It needs to be said that Wheeden and Fisher investigated hypersingular integrals in the context of the theory of Bessel potentials, i.e. the hypersingular integral D01 J was considered to be in Lp together with j. The approach taken in the cited papers by Samko and in this book allows one to take f Lr and D01 f E Lp with different r and p which includes both the "Bessel" and "Riesz" situation. The classification of hypersingular integrals with a homogeneous characteristics both in type and in order of the used finite difference was suggested in Samko [26, p. 235] (1978) and [28, p. 198] (1980). Relations (26.55)-(26.57) were obtained by Samko in the same papers, the first of these expressions in the case 0 < a < 1 being proved by Radzhabov [1] {1974). The question about the simultaneous convergence of hypersingular integrals with different characteristics was considered by Nogin and Samko [1] (1981) and (3] (1982). The same question in the case of non-homogeneous characteristics was investigated by Nogin [1] (1980). The papers by Horvath [1] (1978) and Ortner [2] (1985) concerning problems of analytic continuation and compositions of convolutions with ''pseudo-functions" k ..\ E R1 , are also connected in a sense with the context of § 26.4. Notes to §§ 26.5 and 26.6. Theorem 26.5 was proved in Samko [26] (1978). The answer to question (26.74) in the form (26.81) and (26.82) and Theorem 26.6 was obtained in Samko [28, p. 205-207) (1980) . Notes to § 26.7. The investigation of the space /01(Lp) presented here follows the papers by Samko (17), [18], (1976), [20, 23] (1977) and [31] (1984) and include consideration in the sense of distributions for p � n/a. The space I01(Lp) had arisen earlier, but without constructive characterization in terms of convergence of hypersingular integrals. We refer to, for example, Maz'ya and Havin [1] (1972), where the authors showed that the closure of C0(Rn ) in the norm IIF- 1 I(I01.1" n - 2 admits an analytic continuation to the whole complex plane except for a finite number of poles, and this was shown by Riesz. Another proof of analytic continuation was given by Fremberg [1) (1945), and also [2] (1946). We further point out the method of an analytic continuation given in the book by Baker and Copson [1 , p. 60] (1950) in the case n = 3. Nozaki [1] (1964) considered the Riesz hyperbolic potential (28.19) in the general case (28.3} with an arbitrary p = 1, 2, . . . , n instead of p = 1. He evaluated the nonnalizing constant (28.20) coJTesponding to an arbitrary p and verified the semigroup properties (28.22) and the analytic continuability in a. We refer to the case p ':# 1 in the paper by Trione [2] (1987) or its reprint [3) (1988) . Relation (28.28) was established by Schwartz (1 , t. 2, p. 120) (1961) . In connection with the calculation of the Fourier (Laplace) transform of the power of the Lorentz distance, we mention the book by Vladimirov [1 , § 30) (1963), and the book by Trione (1] (1980), the latter . (R" ) and of fractional order 01 = 01 1 , , Otn ), 01j � 0, generalizing the Liouville spaces L�a ) and consisting of functions J which have partial Liouville derivatives of order Otj in each variable belonging to respectively), were investigated by Chuvenkov [1). 25.13. Connections between Besov spaces (their definition may be found in Nikol'skii (6] or Besov, D'in and Nikol'skii (1]) and fractional differentiation was revealed by Lizorkin [4), (9] who had shown that Bessel fractional integro-differentiation acr - ( 27.8 ) - realizes the isomorphism between Besov spaces: Ga(B; , s> = B;J r , 1 < p < oo , 1 � 8 � oo , 1 � r < oo. Herz [1, p. 315] showed that a similar statement is true for the Riesz fractional integration: JCW(Ar 9) = A cr� r r .., is defined as the completion under the appropriate interpretation of the Besov space. That is Ap,u in the Besov norm of the space of infinitely differentiable functions, the Fourier images of which have a compact support not containing the origin. The obvious relation to Lizorkin space � is evidently seen here. 25.14. The Riesz potential arises naturally in the theory of Radon transform - Helgason [2, p. 20, 29 etc]. We also observe that Bredimas [6) used one-dimensional fractional integration in the problem of inverting the spherical Radon transform. 25.15. The modification of the unilateral Riesz potentials (25.71) adapted to the case of a . f [( 1 + lz J) ( 1 � lz -t I )] f o �I>N �I>N a d d t 1 z :5 Ct i i �I P (N + 1)• f tl+ a ->. f (1 + l z J )( A- clf a(1 + lz t J ) Af a �I>N Here > 0; we choose c < a and c < � - then the inner integral is estimated according to (6.32), so that u 2?r(1 - a) . Then solutions t!J6 (z) of (31.52) are sought, by Theorem 31.6, in the space of functions bounded at both end-points, i.e. in the space H. Therefore 1/J ( z) is to be taken in the class of functions of the form Here 1, it evidently holds on a set dense in L 1 . Since the operators M1 , 1:+ and V1 are bounded in L 1 , this result is extended by continuity to the whole space L 1 . • a, (z J - t) 1-a 0 consist of functions f(x) for 0. Hence it follows that d� IJt 1 0. A function /{z) belongs to L�c , -y) if and only if 0, -1 < Re 11 < 0 and 1/J E AC([O, b]), and we replace the ,P(z) = O (e - �� z" - 1 / 2- e ) as z -+ oo and > 0 for (37.42). 00 0, and let (If_ h)(z) be the fractional integral defined in (2. 18) . Then the solution of (40.36) on the circle l z l = 1, zy =/; 0, in the space of even functions T(f) = T( -f) = T(t) is reduced to the solution of the following Hilbert boundary value problem - Gahov [1] . The Hilbert problem 40.1 . I t is required t o find a function T(z) = e(z, y) + i77(z, y) analytic in a quarter of the disk lzl < 1, Z > 0, y > 0, continuous Theorem 40.6. , :F- 1 1 = j 24, 473, . . .. = H >.. ( O), H� (O) 2, 3, 6 HW , H� , H�(p) 249 Hp 424 Ha .. (p) = H>.. ( O; p), H� (p) = H� (O; p) 4, 5 .. = h>.. ( O), h�(p) 2 hp>.. , h- p>.. , hp>.. ([0, 211"]) 254, 367 h>.. , k (O), h�·lc (p) 7 h;,JJ u 800 { h( X)} ± .. f 741 q T:. " I 443 J:+ .. (TJ, o:)f 738 J-±a , >.. f 741 .. (TJ, o:) 738 ra (x), rb (x) 206 s, s', s+ 46, 155 S ll(y)) (x) 752 wp,, (x) 437 Wp(l, t) 131, 136, 233, 447 X(R1 ), X2,.. 371 Ym (l, x), Ym {u) 528, 529 Y± 22, 94 (z+, zo+, z-, zo-) 424 ...
and
II I:+If'b iiH�+o (p. ) � c ll lf'biiH� (Pt. ) � c ii <J' IIH� (p) · Noting that (I:+
64
CHAPTER 1. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES ON AN INTERVAL
assertion analogous to Theorem 3.3 for integrals with the kernel t > 0. This lemma will naturally hold under weaker conditions. Lemma 3.1.
Then
(z + t ) a
-
1 z > 0, ,
Let cp(z), 0 < z � I, admit the estimate lcp(z)l � kz -r , a < "'f < 1. -
l
t )dt a+fJ /(z) = J (t cp( + z) l-a E H ([O 0
n. , .J ,
z-r +fJ )
(3.11)
for any fJ � 0 such that a + fJ � 1, and 11/llna+l' (z 'Y+I' ) � ck, c being independent on cp(z). Proof.
We have to prove that l
J
�(z) = z"Y+fJ
Assuming that I = 1 and
h > 0 we have
1 l�(z + h) - �(z) l � kl(z + h p +P - z-r+fJ I (z + h + t)a-l t --r dt
J 0
+ kz"Y +fJ
1
J t-"'� [(t
+ z) a-1 - (t + z + h) a- 1 ]dt
0
The inequality (3.8) and the change of variable t � 1 � c 1 h( z + h) a+ fJ- 1
Using
(3.9) we have
= (z + h)s give the estimate
1/ (z+ h ) s- 'Y(l + s)a-1 ds
J 0
§ 3. THE FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF HO LDER AND SUMMABLE FUNCTIONS
4>2 :5 z"Y +/3 h
1
I
65
t - "Y (t + zyr - 2 dt
0
= cz01+P - 1 h
I
1 /z (t + 1)01 - 2 t - "Y dt
0
and we obtain the estimate ct>2 :5 ch01+ P if z ;:::: h. If z :5 h , then
4> 2 :5 2z"Y +P
I 1
t - "Y (t + z)01- 1 dt
0
= 2z01+P
I s-"Y(s 1 /z
+ 1)01 - 1 ds :5 ch01+P .
0
Collecting the estimates for ct> 1 and
p(z) =
n
IT l z - Zk i P• ,
k= 1
Z
a = 1 < z2 <
· · ·
<
Zn :5 b.
( 3 . 12)
Let p(z) be the weight ( 3. 1 2) , A + a < 1 and the following conditions 1} 1' 1 < A + 1; !} A + a < l'k < A + 1, k = 2 , . . . , n - 1; 9) A + a < JJn < A + 1 if Zn < b and A + a < JJn if Zn = b hold. Then the operator 1:+ is bounded from HG(p) into H�+ 01(p).
Theorem 3.4.
The
{
proof of this theorem is in fact a consequence of Theorem 3.3, Theorem 3.3' n - 1 if = b,
and Lemma 3.1. We find it convenient to denote
'Pi (z) n
=
{ cp Zt [ Z Z , ] ( z) , 0,
:5 :5 t + 1 z � z , t+ ,
kZ 1
so that cp( z) = E
i=1
n
1) (I:+
=
n
k 1 , 2, . . . =
Zn Let 1f Zn < b . .
,
n,
66
CHAPTER 1 . FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES ON AN INTERVAL
2) (I:+
p
ex ) (z) - (b - x) �' (b - x ) (Ia+
_
:z;
J a
(t - a) >. dt (b - t) �' - >. (x - t ) l -ex f= 0
((b - x)>.+ex )
3.3. Mapping properties in the space LP
Fractional integrals are known to keep, at least, the space Lp (a, b) invariant, see (2.72) and (2.73). The statements revealing how much the fractional integral I:+
§ 3.
THE FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF HOLDER AND SUMMABLE FUNCTIONS
we have
z:
67
)
f( <> ) I I�\ cpl � j ( !cp(t) l � (z - t)' - � lcp(t) l 1 - f (z - t)' - } dt. a
Using the generalized Holder inequality (1.30) with n = 3, PI = r, P2 = rp/(r - p) and Pa = p' we obtain r (a) I I.;'+ cpl � (
z:
J a
)
�
lcp(t ) l'(z - t)'' - 1 dt '
z:
)
�
�cllcpll i.� � ( j lcp(t)l'(z - t) '' - 1 dt ' . a
Hence II I.;'+ cpiiL , � c llcplli.� f
b
(J a
b
J
)
1 ' 1 lcp(t)l'dt lz - w - dz
a
•
Corollary. Relation (2.20) concerning fractional integration by parts holds if cp(x) E Lp , ,P(x) E L9, 1/p + 1/q � 1 + a, but p =F 1, q =F 1 in the case 1/p + 1/q = 1 + a. In fact, we consider the case 1/p + 1/q = 1 + a taking the imbedding (1.31) into account. By Theorem 3.5, integrals on the left- and right-hand sides of (2.20)
are absolutely convergent - apply the Holder inequality. So the interchange of the order of integration leading to (2.20) is justified by Fubini's theorem.
If a > 0, p > 1/a, then the fractional integration operator I:+ is bounded from Lp (a, b) into Ha-lfP(a, b) if a - 1/p =f; 1, 2, . . . , and into H a - l/p ,I /p' (a, b) if a - 1/p = 1, 2, . . . , and
Theorem 3.6.
(3.13 )
68
CHAPTER 1. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES ON AN INTERVAL
Proof.
We obtain {3.13) using the Holder inequality $ c(x - at- t (/ lcp(t) IP dt) z:
a
1. •
.
Further, we consider the case a - 1/p � 1 at first. For x,
x
+ h E (a , b] we have
z:+ h l (I;:+ cp)(x + h) - (I;:+ cp)(x) = r (n) (x + h - W - 1 cp(t)dt z: z: + r n) [(x + h - t) "- 1 - (x - w - 1 ]cp(t)dt = I1 + I, .
f
tf a
(3.14)
Using the Holder inequality {1.28) we find � . z:+ h . (x + h - t) <<>- l )p' dt lcp(t)l" dt I II I $ r n) z: z:
z:+ h
t (f
) (f 1.
:r: - o
$ lf(n) l - 1 h"- } II'PIIL,
( j ls"- 1 - (s + l)"- 1 IP' dt) -x-
1
7.
0
- a � h, then an estimate for /2 is clear. (A + B) 1 1P ' � A l/p' + B 11P ' to obtain
If x
)
If x - a > h, then we use {3.9) and
§ 3.
THE FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF HOLDER AND SUMMABLE FUNCTIONS
I Ia I :5 ha - lfp I 'Pi lL,
[
Ct
+ ca
(x- a )/ h
J1
69
]
l/p' s< a- >)p' ds
C4
being additionally multiplied by {In xh.a) l/p' in the case a t 1. Hence we derive the estimate if a - 1/p < 1, if a - 1/p = 1. Collecting the estimates for and l2 we complete the proof of the theorem when a - 1/p 1. Let now a - 1/p > 1. Then k < a - 1/p k + 1, k 1, 2, . . . , and this case is reduced to the previous one by direct differentiation: -
It
$.
$.
=
=
dk [a
Corollary.
'
Theorem 3.6 holds in a stronger form
1:+ : Lp (a, b) -+ h a- l/P ([a, b]) , 0 < 1/p < a < 1 + 1/p, where h). is the space (1.2). Proof. For
c
-·
I (I:+
70 CHAPTER 1. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES ON AN INTERVAL
Remark 3.3. The statement on the boundedness of the operator 1:+ from L 00 into H01 mentioned above ( the Corollary of Theorem 3. 1) corresponds to the case p = oo in Theorem 3.6.
3.4. Mapping properties in the space LP (p) Now we consider the mapping properties of fractional integration operators in the weighted spaces Lp (p) with weight (3. 12) where a = Zt < z2 < · · · < Zn = b. It proves to be that even in the case of the simplest weight p( z) = l z - d l "' concentrated in one point d of the interval [a, b), that the restrictions on the exponent turn out to be essentially different depending on the fact as to whether the point d of this interval coincide with the end-points of the interval [a, b) or is an inner point of it. We find it convenient to admit here into consideration a half-axis as well: -oo < a < b � oo. We begin our consideration with the weight p(z) = (z - a) "'. The following lemma about the commutation of fractional integrals with power functions allows us to pass directly from the "nonweighted" theorem on the boundedness of fractional integration operators to their weighted analogues. The notation p"'(z) = (z - a ) "' will be used in Lemmas 3.2, 3.3 and in Theorem 3.7, 3.8 unlike that used above. Lemma 3.2. -1 + 1/p.
I' >
Let 0 < a < 1 , r.p Then the equalities
E
Lp (O, 1),
0 <
I�
oo ,
1 < p < oo,
and
(3. 15) (3. 16)
hold, Ai being bounded in Lp(O, I) operators in the form
z Ai = 7r - 1 �J sin a7r j Ai (x, t)r.p(t)dt, i = 1 , 2, z 1 / ( y - t ) 01 ( t ) "' dy A t (z, t) = t-, - x -x - y -y y t z 1 / ( y - t ) 01 ( y) dy A 2 (z, t) = -- -. 0
x-t t
x-y
z
I'
y
The case p = 1, I' > 0 as in Lemma 10. 1 below, shows that if r.p E L 1 ( 0 , I) for (3. 15) and (l in z l + 1)r.p(z) E L t (O, /) for (3. 16), then the above equalities remain true
§ 3. THE FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF HO LDER AND SUMMABLE FUNCTIONS
71
and the operators ( 3.15 ) and ( 3.16 ) are bounded and ( l ln z l + 1)(
,\ =
{ J.l,a - e,
p < a, p � a,
where 0 < e < a. In view of this estimate, the operator A 1 is bounded in Lp (O, I) by Theorem 1 .5. The boundedness of the operator A2 is proved similarly. Now we verify ( 3.15 ) . We have
-
p sin a 1r 1rf (a)
"" (y - t)01dy x j t
%
P.
0
t
y1 +
Using ( 1 1 .4 ) from § 1 1 to evaluate inner integrals on the right-hand side we obtain (3.15) . Relation ( 3.16 ) is proved similarly. • The following statement generalizes Lemma 3.2 to the case of weighted spaces and an arbitrary a > 0.
Let a > 0, a :f. 1 , 2 , 3 , . . . ,
Lemma m
3.3.
j
% m ) A 1
c; =
1 C Ot . ' + m-J T + e( - T ]j - p. -m- 1 de, ) x ( 1 _ e) { Ot } (
J (m j ) (mm!(-j - m -
A 1; (z, T) = Tp. (z - T)m-j +1
0
JJ )m-j + 1
' j ) !f (a) f ( 1 - { a } )
72
1. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES ON AN INTERVAL
CHAPTER
Equality (3.15) is verified by direct application of the fractional differentiation operator V0+ to p - 1-' Ig+ p#J
Theorem 3. 7. q = p/[1 - (a operator 1:+ is
Let, at first, 1 < p < We set
oo.
o/ '
:5
z;
0
from whence 111"' - m I�+ 'P il L.
:5
r(�)
-·
I II"' 'P I I
t
l
(J
z;
.,(p- m )q dz
0
smce
J 0
)
( z - y)< a- l) t y- P( t - l ) I 'P( Y) Idy
00
k(y) = y-1-'tJ
J
z(IJ- m )q(x - y) ( a- l )q dx
11
00
=
J1
e< IJ- m ) q (e - 1) ( a- l} q de
<
00 .
1
i
§ 3.
THE FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF HOLDER AND SUMMABLE FUNCTIONS •
73
The theorem is thus proved. The important particular case Jl = 0 and q = p in Theorem 3.7 is to be noted: b j { ( - a) - a"I (J�\II')(x) l" dx } !.' ::; ci ii'I L, , a 1
oo ,
The inequality
(3.17)
oo.
oo
1
b
{ j(b - x) - ap i(J�+ II') (x)l" dx } ::; ci ii'I L, , (3.18) a 1 < p < 1/ o:,
-oo
oo,
(3.17')
a
a
which is proved by simple estimates. A particular case of Theorem 3.7 when p = 1, a = 0 (a: = m, Jl = - ) is also to be emphasized: c
b
jb z - a-e i (I�+cp)(z) ldx � c j z-e lcp(x) ldx, b > 0, o: > 0, 0
0
where c = ( ) This relation does not hold if = 0 (lim c( ) = o e c = 0 the inequalities c c .
c
c
c
> 0,
oo ) .
In the case (3.17" )
74
CHAPTER 1. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES ON AN INTERVAL
b
00
b 1 b 1 Jb z - 1 ln� -+b -z i (I�z1 - a
changing the order of integration on the left-hand side. The latter is derived from the former if we replace z by z - 1 , b by b - 1 and
Let -oo < a < b < oo. If 1 < p < oo, 0 < a - 1/p < 1, then the operator I�+ is bounded from Lp (pP) into n; - 1 /P (pPIP), JJ < p - 1; and
Theorem 3.8.
(3.19) Proof. When applying the Holder inequality to I�+
=
(z
1: ) 1/p ( 1: - pf(p- l )
a
a
To prove the boundedness of the operator I�+ form Lp (p») into n; - 1/P (pPIP ) we use the commutation relation (3.15). We have pPIP I';+ p-1'1P tp0 = I';+ t/J, ll t/J IIL p � cll <poiiL p which yields the wanted result by Theorem 3.6. •
Corollary. Theorem 3.8 holds also in a stronger form 0 < p-1 < a < p-1 + 1, where h� ( r) is the weighted space (1.12). Proof. Any function in Lp can be approximated by infinitely differentiable functions which are finite on (a, b) as seen in property e) of functions in Lp in § 1 .2. Hence, for 'P E Lp (pP) we have the representation
§ ·3. THE FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF HO LDER AND SUMMABLE FUNCTIONS
A/ =
/(z + t) - l(z), I = 1:+ cp, we have
gives the estimate I.A (pPIPJ:+ cp£ ) 1 � c ll cp£ II L,. ( P" ) h a- t fp . E L1(p"') for any q > p then by Theorem 3.8 again we find
Theorem Ge
3.8
as h -+ 0 + . Substituting the obtained estimates into (3.20) we obtain ha- t(ce + o( 1 )). This proves the corollary. •
Now we are to consider the case of weight p(z)
75
Since
lA (/i I) I �
= lz - dl '\ a < d � b <
oo .
Let 1 < p < 1 /a and JJ < p - 1 , the latter in the case d < b only. Then the operator 1:+ is bounded from Lp (p), p(z) = l z - d l "', into L9 ( r) where q = p/( 1 - ap) , r(z) = lz - d l" and Theorem 3.9.
II > -1
11 = pq/p
if
JJ
� ap - 1 ,
if
JJ
> ap - 1 ,
(3.2 1 )
cp(t) = It - di - PIP,P(t), ,P(t) E Lp (a, b). The functions cp and 1/J may be considered to be nonnegative. Then for z E (a, d) we have
Proof. Let
z: z: (d - z)"lt - IJ/P J(x - t) a- l ,p(t)dt and A2 = (d - z)"'' f [(d - t) -pfp_ (d - z) - PIP)(z - t) a- l ,p(t)dt. From (3.21) it follows that 11/q - pfp � 0. Therefore, by Theorem 3.5 we obtain
where A 1 =
G
G
(3.22)
76
A
CHAPTER 1 . FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES ON AN INTERVAL ;=::
similar estimate has to be proved for A2 . If Jl 0, then
]
z p ; < A2 = (d - x) �- j [ ( dd -- xt ) pf - 1 (x,P(t)dt - t) l -a - 2A 1 1 a
and we can use (3.22). If Jl < 0, we have A2 = (d - xtfq j [(d - t) ¥ - (d - x) ¥](x - t)a- t ,p(t)dt. z
a
If
Jl � o:p - 1 , then according to (3.8) we obtain
d � c(d - x)., (d - t) " Ja
"+
11 -
where 0 <
c
< 11 + 1.
P
If Jl > o:p - 1 , we represent A2 as
p _ c j ( dd -- e ) g(e)de d-e ' z
<
=
.lel+ a- 1 ,P(t)dt
x
e.
(3.23}
a
where g I<;+ ,P E L9(a, d}, I Y I L.,{a,d) � cll f/JI Lp(a,d) · We note that the integral operator on the right-hand9side of (3.23) is bounded in Lp (a, d) by Theorem 1 .5 . We estimate (x - d)"I (J<;+ cp}(x} for E (d, b). We have x
(3.24}
§ 3.
THE FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF HOLDER AND SUMMABLE FUNCTIONS
If I' �
o:p -
1, 0 < < min( 1 - o:, + 1 ) , for B1 we derive B1 -< ( _ d) ; f (d-(x -t)tp- -tf;(t)dt a-e a ( ) � c(x - d) ., Iaa++ e + P 1/J ( d) c
v
v �
z
d
e. P
v- �
If I' >
o:p -
77
e.
1, then we replace the function (x - ty�- 1 in B 1 by the relation
- see ( 11.4) . Interchanging the order of integration we obtain
ag(T) fa ( Td -- dt ) tf;(t)dt T-t . By Theorem 1.5 we have IIYIILp (d,b) � cii..P IILp(a,b) · Hence, by Theorem 3.7, we find d
e. P
=
The required estimate for the second term in (3.24) is obtained by application of Theorem 3.7, which completes the proof. Remark 3.4. If p fp � o: - 1 /p in Theorem 3. 9 we can not take pqfp. Indeed, taking so(x) ld - x i - 1'/P for x E (�,d) we obtain (d- x)i(J�+so)(x) � c(d - x)i j (x(d-- t)t)a-p 1 dt •
=
v =
v
v
!!±.!. :ot
a
e.
78
CHAPTER 1. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES ON AN INTERVAL
The analogue of Theorem 3.9 holds for general power weights as well:
p(z)
=
n k= 1
n r(z) kn= lz - Zk l1111 , 1 a Z 1 < . . . < Zn b.
n l z - Zk !P• ,
=
=
(3.25)
=
We state without proof the corresponding proposition for the operator
I:+ .
J.lk < p - 1 for k 1, 2, . . . , n - 1; 0 ::; m ::; a, 1 _(a":_m)p , 111 ( � - m) llk ( � - m) if J.lk > ap - 1 and llk > (a - ; - m) if J.lk ap - 1, k 2, . . . , n. Then the operator I:+ is bounded from Lp (p) into Lq ( r) . We investigate the problem whether the fractional integrals I:+
0
, q
Let 1 < p < oo, =
:5
q,
=
=
=
=
q,
=
q,
:5
p
oo
=
JJ
v=p
=
=
oo ,
p
p
=
ll p' p
=
Q - !,
p
if (3.26) cl lr.po iiL, > { 1I //IIIH�mi-a(v.�� -�) if 1. . , We fix the point a 1 E (a, d). Then, by Theorem 3.8, we have / (z) E na- 1/P([a , a1 ] ), and /(a) 0 and 1 /l n�-1/P([a,a .]) ::; ci i'Po iiL, · We demonstrate that /(z) vanishes if z d and satisfies (3.26) on [a 1 , d]. Let z E (a 1 , d) . Then we _
have
=
=
ll
H
,
if
_J. T Q - !
ll =
Q - !.
§ 3. THE FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF HO LDER AND SUMMABLE FUNCTIONS
79
We estimate u(z):
- ' ( l u(z) l :5 c(d - z) ll<poiiL p ! (d - t) IIP dtp ) Ql
11
Q
(a 1 - t)( 1 -a) '
7 1
For v( z) we have
l v(z) l :5 If v <
(a 1 (d - z)" ll<poii Lp (! (z - t) - )P dt ) Z:
Ot
a - 1/p, then
lv (x)l :'>
1
(d t) "P' _
7 1
.
( 3.27)
z:
1/p' (d - x J" II'PoiiL, ( j (x - t)
If " >
Q -
1/p, then, after the change of variable
l v(x) l $ (d - zt - t ii'PoiiL,
In the case when
(f
"'·--·:tel Ot
t = z - e(d - z), we get
e(a- l )p' ( 1 + e) - vp' de
)
1/p'
v = a - 1/p we similarly obtain 1
i v(x) i :«; (d - xJ " II'PoiiL , (J e( a- l )p' de + :5
0
c(d - z)" ll<poiiLp (l + l ln(d - z) l ).
j C ' de)
� tl-:te
1
since we take z - a 1 > d - z. It follows from the above estimates that f(d - 0) = 0. It is similarly proved that /( d + 0) = 0 if d < b. To estimate the Holder norm of the function /(�) when z E [ab dj, we
80
CHAPTER 1. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES ON AN INTERVAL
represent f(z) as z)" - (d - t)" cpo (t)dt + j (d/(z) = J (zcp-o(t)dt a t)"(x - tp - a tp (da a = ft (x ) + h (x). By Theorem 3.8 we have ll!t llnar-1/P ((a,b]) $ cllcpo i iLp(a,b) · For /2 we get !2 (x+h) -!2 (x) J1 + J2 + Ja, $ x < x+h :::; d, J�, J2 and Ja being the same as (3.7) but with (z - ) replaced by (d- x)". We estimate J1 considering for simplicity the case v :::; 1 only. We have x+h 1 ( ' p ) ' l ( ) llt l � II 'Po i iL, J ( d- W"• (z + h - t) a - l ( d - t)" - (d - z- h ) " ( X
in
X
=
a1
a �'
dt
X
x+h ( � cllcpo i i L, J ( d - W"P ' (z + h - t) (a+ v - l )p'
dt
X
)
P'
� •
x+h 1 ( ) p ( ' � cii'Po i i L, J (z + h - t) a- t dt) � ch"- } II'Po iiL, · P'
X
Estimating J2 we find
a1 1 p t)-v t)-"P dt dt ) pr (! (d(d$ ch" llcpo iiLp (al t)(l - a)pl + J (x t)(l - a)p1 a a1 I
X
_
I
_
The integral in parenthesis coincides with the integral in (3.27) which has already been estimated. Therefore, we have IJ2 I :::; ch" llcpo iiLp(a ,b) if v < a - 1/p. Ifl vp � a-1/p, then the expression in square brackets is estimated by 1+ c(d-x)a- v - f :::; 1 + cha - v - l /p if v > a - 1/p and by 1 + I,. e<• -ar)p�fl+{)"'P' :::; c (1 + ln k) if v = a - p which yields the required result for J1 . .., _ .. ,
1,
0
§ 3. THE FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF HO LDER AND SUMMABLE FUNCTIONS
We go further by estimating J2 . We
Ja =
81
fix any point 6 E (a, a t ) and represent J3
( j + j + j ) (d - ���t�� - t)" [(z + h - t)"- 1 - (z -t)"- 1]<po (t)dt 6
(Jl
a
6
z
a1
It is obvious that 6
I Jst l 5 ch j l <po (t) dt 5 ch l <poi i L p 0
Cor the first term and that
�
' ( I Jaa l $ ci 'Po i L , j l (z - t)" - 1 - (z + h - tt - 1 1"' dt) (J l
6
for the second one. Lastly we have
I Jaa l
$ cii 'Po i L,
(j (= = :r· l (z -t)"- 1 - (z + h - tt- 1 1'' l, dt
(Jl
cha-l/pll<po i LP .
1,
whence IJ33I 5 The inequality (3.26) on the interval [a d] follows from the above estimates. For [d, 6] , if d < b, the arguments are similar. The theorem is thus proved. • The dependence of the order of the Holder property of the fractional integral I = on the correlation between pfp and a - 1/p is caused by the behavior of the integral I = at the point = d. This behaviour can be described by varying the exponent of a weight function for l(z). In this case, the Holder order is not changed and is equal to a - 1/p. We state without proof the theorem on the boundedness of the fractional integration operator in such an interpretation for a general power weight (3.25). One may find another variant of a similar theorem in § 4.2 (note 3.1). Remark 3.5.
I:+
=
z
Let 1 < p < oo, 1/p < a < 1 + 1/p and JJ J: < p - 1 for 1, 2, . . . , n - 1. Then the operator I:+ is bounded from L,(p) into H; - l/p(r),
Theorem 3. 12.
k
I:+
82
CHAPTER 1. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES ON AN INTERVAL
if r(x) = (x - a)�. /p n lx - Xk l 6 lc ' A = { k : k E kEA Jl k > 0} and 6k = l'k /P if l'k > crp - 1 and 6k = a + £k - 1/p, £k > 0,
and even into
h�- l /p (r),
{2, 3, . . . , n } , if l'k � ap - 1 . The question naturally arises concerning mapping properties of fractional integration in the weighted spaces Lp (P) with an arbitrary, not necessary power, weight. In this case, weight functions satisfying the so-called Muckenhoupt-type condition are considered. We shall not consider this question here, but observe that one may find the some information in § 9.2 (note 5.8). See also Theorem 25.4 and § 29.2 (notes 25.8 and 26.11} in the multi-dimensional case.
§ 4. Bibliographical Remarks and Additional Information to Chapter 1 4.1. Historical notes The survey of papers concerning the origin and development of the main ideas of fractional calculus was given in the brief historical outline at the beginning of the book. Here our historical comments refer to the contents of this chapter only. Notes to §§ 2.1 and 2.2. Equation (2.1) has associated with the name of Abel, who was the first person, who considered and solved this equation for 0 < a < 1 in connection with the tautochrone problem - Abel [1] (1823), (2] (1826). The false notion that Abel dealt only with the case a = 1/2 has already been noted in the "Brief historical outline" . The Abel type equation z
J(x2 - a2) -1 12r.p(s)ds f(x) was solved by Joahimstal [1] (1861) . =
A more general equation of
0
such a type:
/[T(x) - T(s)]a-l r.p(s)ds z
=
f(x),
a > 0,
(4.1}
0
with a monotone increasing function T (x) was in fact solved by Sato [1] (1935}, although its solution was already known to Holmgren (1] (1865-1866} . Equation (4.1 } occurs frequently in many applications. We note for example its employment in the theory of generalized analytic functions, Polozhii [1] {1964}, (2, p.236] (1965}, (3, p.186] (1973) . The solution of (2.1} developed in § 2.1 is well known. The criteria of its solvability in Lt (a, b) given in Theorems 2.1 and 2.3 is less known. They were given by Tamarkin (1 , Theorem 4] (1930} for a > 0. The proof of Tamarkin's theorem was expounded in Dzherbashyan's book [2] . The role of absolute continuity in the theory of fractional integrals of summable functions was thoroughly cleared up by Tamarkin (1] (1930), although Tonelli (1] (1928} had earlier used the idea of absolute continuity for solving the Abel equation and had in particular obtained the statement of Corollary of Lemma 2.1 and (2.14) with f E AC([a, b]). The criteria of solvability of the Abel equation in the space of continuous functions was in fact obtained in the book of Boch.er (1 , p.S-9] (1909} the conditions in (2.9} being then replaced by the conditions ft -a (x) E C 1 ((a, b]}, Riemann (1] (1847) (published in 1876) . contained in this paper. As well as Liouville, Riemann dealt with the so-called "complementary" functions when he defined fractional differentiation. These functions are in fact power functions with arbitrary constant coefficients which were introduced by Liouville and Riemann in order that the relation 1:+ v:+ 1 = f be
ft -a (a)
= 0. Notes to § 2.3. Definition 2.1 goes back to Definition 2.2 of fractional differentiation is also
§ 4. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 1.
83
valid for all admissible f, cf. (2.60). We mention the polemics in the paper by Cayley (1] (1880) connected with the "complementary" functions. The first people who deliberately refused to use "complementary" functions were Holmgren (1] (1865-1866), and independently, Letnikov (4) ( 1 874). Avoiding these functions Hohngren and Letnikov introduced fractional differentiation as an operation which is the left inverse to fractional integration. This approach is widely used in the modem analysis. They constructed the foundations of fractional calculus via such an approach. Relation (2.20) was established by Love, Young [1] (1938). Equation (2.26) was known to Euler (1, p.56) (1738) in the sense that he introduced the fractional derivative of a power function by (2.26) as a definition. Notes to § 2 .4. The order a of fractional integro-differentiation was already taken as complex in the papers by Liouville, Riemann, Griinwald, Letnikov, Sonine and others. Fractional bttegrals of purely imaginary order a = i8 were introduced by Kober (2] (1941), by means of Mellin transform, which enabled one to consider such a fractional integration as an operation continuous in oo) Forms (2.37) and (2.38) of fractional integration of purely imaginary order arose in Kalisch [1] (1967), where it was shown that they generate operators bounded in Lp (O, 1), 1 < p < oo See such statement in Lemma 8.2 below for the case of the whole real axis.. The paper by Fisher (2] (1971) also concerned the investigation of purely imaginary order fractional integration in the space The detailed investigation of composition formulae, the so-called index laws, for purely imaginary order fractional integrals was undertaken by Love (4], (5) (1971-1972). Theorem 2.2 is in fact contained in Tamarkin [1] (1930). The result (2.43) itself was given for sufficiently "good" functions by Holmgren [1, p.7), (1865-1866), and Letnikov (1, p.26], (1868). Notes to § 2.5. Relations (2.44)-(2.54) for the evaluation of fractional integrals of elementary functions were known long ago. In particular, (2.44) and (2.45) are iri fact due to �uler [1] (1738), who introduced them by definition, while (2.48) and (2.49) may be found in Holmgren [1, p.27), (1865-1866). The relation in (2.50) with {3 = 1 for logarithmic functions was given by Letnikov [1, p.37], (1868). The result in (2.54) is a modification of a Sonine's formula, known as a first Sonine integral - Sonine (3] (1880) or his book [6, p.206]. In connection with the derivation of (2.50) let us note that the idea of obtaining results containing power-logarithmic functions from the corresponding expressions for purely power functions by differentiating with respect to the power exponent is due to Volterra (2] (1916). Using this method one may obtain results for the fractional integration of functions r.p(x) = (x - a).8- 1 1nm(x - a) in particular - see Table 9.1 in § 9.3 below. as an object in itself arose originally in Notes to § 2.6. The space 1:+ [ 1 (a, Dzherbashyan and Nersesyan (4] (1960), (5) (1961), while the space appeared in Samko [7] (1969) for the case Rl , and in Rubin [1] (1972) for the case of a finite interval. Theorem 2.3 was given by Tamarkin [1] (1930). The reasons for the insufficiency of the almost everywhere existence of summable derivative 'D�+ f for repre�enting the function f(x) by the fractional integral of order a which were discussed after Theorem 2.3 are essential. The error of the sufficiency of this condition is contained in a number of investigations on fractional calculus. Definition 2.4 used in this book enabled us to give a strict proof of (2.58) which has been "proved" by different authors under the wrong assumption that 'D�+ f exists almost everywhere and is summable only. Notes to § 2.7. The semigroup property (2.65) of fractional integration operators was proved in the papers by Riemann, Holmgren, and Letnikov. Among the mathematicians of the 19th century the latter gave the most exact and complete exposition of this property, see Letnikov (4, ch.II] (1874) and [5] (1874). It is relevant to refer to the characterization of the properties of fractional integration from the point of view of semigroup theory which was given in the book of Hille and Phillips [1 , Ch.23, p.674-690]. Theorem 2.5 was proved by various authors at different times under diverse assumptions. In the case of integrals understood in the Denjoy sense this theorem was proved by Bosanquet [1] (1931) for 0t > 0, {3 > 0; the case of Stieltjes integrals, summable in the Cesaro sense, was treated in Isaacs (2] (1960). A consideration of (2.65), more complete than in Theorem 2.5, .was given by Love (5] (1972) which included the cases Re a = 0 and Re{3 = 0. Theorem 2.6 was firstly formulated and proved to all appearance by Hille - Hille
L2 (0,
.
.
Lp .
(a, b) =
L b))
JOt (Lp (a, b))
CHAPTER 1. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES ON AN INTERVAL
84
and Phillips [1 , p.675) .
The proof of Theorem 2.7 is adopted from the book of Dzherbashyan
[2, p.568). For the analogous multidimensional assertion for Riesz fractional integration we refer to
§
29.2 (note 25.17).
Notes to
§§ 3.1 and 3.2.
The first result concerning fractional differentiation of Holderian
functions is due to Weyl (1] (1917). He showed - in the periodic case which will be considered in
§
19 - that functions satisfying the Holder condition of order
derivatives of order
Ot
�
had continuous fractional
A similar statement for fractional Riemann-Liouville derivatives in the
< �.
non-periodic case considered in
§ 3 was obtained by Montel
(1] (1918). For this purpose he used
Bernstein-type theorems on the rate of approximation of a function by algebraic polynomials. The exact result on the mapping properties of fractional integra-differentiation within the framework
of H>.. -spaces are due to Hardy and Littlewood (3] (1928). They obtained Theorem 3.1 on mapping properties of I from H to H + a , � + Ot 1 (as well as Lemma 3.1 on such properties for + v
:+
from
: H6 , � >
6
;
;
<
a , to n -a which is proved in
:
mapping properties of I
§
13 below) . Theorems 3.3, 3.3' and 3.4 on
H6 (P)
in the spaces with a power weight were proved by Rubin (7) + (1974) under the restriction 0 J.l. l � + 1 on the power exponent relating to the point x a .
. These theorems
are
<
<
proved here under the assumption
J.l. l
< �+1
=
as in the paper by Rubin [22]
(1986). We followed these Rubin's papers, except Theorem 3.4, which is proved in a different way. We note the paper by Chen (1] (1959) who considered the mapping properties in weighted Holder spaces for certain integral operators, generalizing the case of fractional integration. The result in this paper includes Theorem 3.3 with 0
5 � < 1. §§ 3.3 and 3.4. Theorems 3 .5-3.7 were established b y Hardy and Littlewood [3] (1928) , see also § 9.1 (notes to § 5.3) in this connection. A simple assertion that into with r < p/(1 - ap) was first noted by Hardy [1] {1917). The formulated
Notes to
(1] ( 1925),
:
Lp Lr
I maps + specification for the case
Ot
-
1/ p
=
1 , 2, . . . was given by Kilbas. Theorem 3.8 was obtained by
basis of Lemma 3.2 on continuation.
KMapetyants and Rubin (2] (1984). We gave a shorter proof given by Rubin [22] (1986) on the The proof of Theorem 3.7 is also based on Lemma 3.2.
It was given in Rubin (22] {1986) , see also [17, p.529] (1983), and by Karapetyants and Rubin (2] (1984).
The proof of Theorem 3.7 in the case p = 1 is due to Flett (3] (1958). Lemma 3.2
was proved by Karapetyants and Rubin (1] (1982), (3] (1986). A more general Lemma 3.3 was obtained by Rubin (17, p.529] (1983). The proof of corollaries of Theorems 3.6 and 3.8 were noted
in Karapetyants
and Rubin (2] (1984} .
Rubin [22] (1986) in the case m
E
=
[0, a) . We gave here a simpler proof of this theorem in the
Theorem 3.10 was proved by Karapetyants and Rubin (2] (1984) in the case m
particular case only. We refer to Theorem 3.9, when the weight is related to a single point
'¢
0, and x
= d.
This 'proof w as obtained b y Kilbas and Rubin independently and it h as not been published earlier. Theorem 3.1 1 was proved by Karapetyants and Rubin [2] (1984} in the . case case 11 =
Ot -
11
0t -
1/p. The
1 /p was considered by Kilbas, but not published earlier. Theorem 3.12 was proved
by Rubin [22] ( 1 986).
4.2. Survey of other results (relating to §§ 1-3) 2.1. equation
The solution of Abel's equation on an arc in the complex plane and of the more general
0
a was given by Sakalyuk (3] in the case when with the end-points a and
2.2.
b.
P(t)
< Ot <
1.
is a polynomial and
t,
T
E
C, C is a smooth arc
Bosanquet [1] considered the Abel equation when its solution is not necessarily
Lebesgue integrable, the integrals being understood in the Denjoy sense.
2.3.
There are many papers concerning approximate solution of Abel's equation (2.1 ) .
We note some o f them. The paper by Whittaker [1] appears t o b e the firs t one. The method
§
4. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 1.
85
of approximation of the solution by means of Jacobi polynomials was suggested by Fettis [I]. Orthogonal polynomials were used for the same purpose by Minerbo and Levy (I]. A numerical
>
X
method of solving the more general equation Jk(x, t)(x- t) -a
J k(x - t)
He gave its exact solution
=
f(x), x
> a.
.!!._ J a
(4.2)
X
(4.2')
under the assumption that for the kernel k(x) there exists the function l (x) such that X
J k(t)l(x - t)dt = 1
for
x>
0
0.
(4.211 )
The existence of such a function l (x) is gu�anteed for example in the case of the kernels of the 00 00 form k(x) xa -l g(x), g(x) 2: a11 x11 , In this case l(x) = x - a h(x), h(x) = 2: b11 x 11 , 11:0 11=0 Ot 1 (Wick [1]). The wider class of kernels k(x) satisfying Sonine's condition was pointed out by Rubin [14, p.62-63). We note that Volterra [1] used the method of solving the Abel equation (2.1) in order to reduce the more general equation
0< <
=
=
ao ::/; 0.
J (!�'t?a
0t
a
with a continuous function k(x , t), to an integral equation of the second kind with a kernel without a singularity. Volterra called this approach the kernel transfonnation method. Such reductions may be seen in § 31.3 below in greater detail.
86
1.
CHAPTER
2 .5.
FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES ON AN INTERVAL
The solution of Abel type integral equation of the second kind
cp(x) - r (�a )
3:
J (xcp(t)dt - t)1 -a
= f(x),
0
x>
0, a > 0,
(4.3)
was given by Hille and Tamarlcin [1] in tenns of the Mittag-LeiBer special functions (1 .90): 3:
cp(x) = d: j Ea [�(x - t) a]f(t)dt .
(4.4)
0
One may verify (4.4) by applying the Laplace transform with ( 1 .93) for the transform of the Mittag-LeiBer function and (7.14) below, taken into account .
a=
Equation (4.3) with 1 / 2 was used by Gorenflo [4] for solving some applied problems connected with the Newtonian heating of a homogeneous half-space by radiation from outside across
the boundary.
Equation (4.4) defines (up to the change of
operator
� by 1/ �) the resolvent (�E - /�+ ) -1
of the
In this connection it is necessary to mention the papers
Ig+ of fractional integration.
by Hille [1 , 2], concerning the investigation of this resolvent , as well as considerating the special
properties of fractional integration operators in the general context of linear operator spectral theory and ergodic theory - Hille and Phillips [1] . The resolvent integral operator
M., =
j [ (x �t�;-l
+
(E - �M) -1 of a more general
]
M1 (x,t) 'P(t)dt,
0
was investigated by Hromov [1] , Matsnev [1] , [2] and Matsnev and Hromov [1] with the aid of
the proper�ies of fractional differentiation 1>0t and of asymptotics of the Mittag-LeiBer function, M1 (x, t) being a function sufficiently smooth eyond t = x and having a behaviour "better" than (x - t) a -1 as t - x. In this connection see also Kabanov [1 , 2]. We note that Hille and Tamarkin [2] obtained bounds of eigenvalues of operators of fractional integration type § 23.2 (note 1 9.1 ) . The extension of this result to the so-called singular values was given by Faber and Wing [1 ] .
-
0
see
The equation
(
00
J
0, X e R1 , 0 < a < cp(x) = Ce -az , = � 1 /a ,
cp(x) - r a) (t - x) Q -1 c,c(t)dt = with
�
> 0 has
z
the non-trivial solution
(Hardy and Titchmarsh [1], see also Titchmarsh
a
[1]).
1,
which is its general solution
Brakhage, Nickel an d Rieder [1] gave a closed form solution of (4.3) i n tenns of elementary functions in the case when
a
a = m/n <
is rational:
1 . The case
a=
1/2 for the equation of
the type (4.3) considered on the whole real line was known to Liouville [5, p.285], (1834). The equation
�k cp(x) - � L..t! r (ak ) n-1
k =O
z
J (x -cp(t)dtt)1-a,. O
more general than (4.3) but with rational
ak =
k/n
= f(x), X >
0,
(4.5)
was solved by Kostitzin [1] and Rieder [1] .
The latter paper also contains an investigation of a system of equations in the fonn of (4 .5) .
§ 4. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 1. The equation
z:
cp(x) - �a
f (xcp(t)dt - t)1-a
x
=
J(x),
0
0
<X<
87
1,
with fixed aingularity at x = 0 is solvable in closed form. The corresponding homogeneous equation . . +c:r - 1 /.f) I'(l)r( L -- • � examp1e, m Lp [0, 1] , 1 IUIIJ m general a nontr1v1 tor 'al so1ut10n, . p oo, if "'' > r( c:r 1 l{p) , see Mihailov [1, p.29). Let us also note that in Davis [1 , p.105) (see also the equation
< <
-
[2]) there is given a procedure for solving
z:
f (xP(t)cp(t)dt (X ) - t)1-c:r J ' =
x>a
(4.6)
a
in the case when P(t) is a polynomial and Ot is rational. Equations (4.3), (4.5) and (4.6) a4joint to differential (or integro-differential) equations of fractional order, which are in general considered in § 42. In the applied problems nonlinear Abel equations arise. We cite, for example, Schneider [1] , which contains the simplest case (cp(x)]l +a /IJ - �(I�+ cp)(x) = 0 with a special value of �. and remark that there is a great deal of investigations of non-linear Abel equations of the second kind with a non-linearity of a general type under the integral sign. We note Dinghas [1) as one of the first such papers and the comprehensive works by Gorenflo and Vessela [1 , 2], where a detailed survey of the investigations with applications is given. See also Lubich [2) for a numerical method of solving a non-linear Abel-type equations of the second kind. We note that if we choose J(x) := 1 in (4.3) and (4.4) and substitute then cp(x) = Ec:r ( �01 ) into (4.3), we obtain the following relation
f Ec:r (�tc:r ) dt (x - t)1- c:r r(Ot) z:
�
=
Ea ( �a ) - 1 , Ot > 0,
(4.7)
0
for the fractional integration of a Mittag-Lemer function. We alao note the related expression z:
tP -1 E201 •/J (t2c:r ) f dt r(Ot) (x - t)1- c:r 1
--
=
xlf-1[Ec:r,{J (xc:r) - E2c:r ,{J (x2c:r)] , Ot > 0, {3 > 0,
(4.8)
0
which may be checked by directly applying the Laplace transform with the aid of (1 .93). Equations (4.7) and (4.8) were obtained in the papers by Humbert and Agarwal [1) and Agarwal [1], where one may find other relevant relations, see also the book of Dzhebashyan [2, Ch.Ill, 1). 2.6. Equation (2.20) of fractional integration by parts allows one to construct new biorthogonal function system using a given system
J
=
cSn, m , n, m = 1 , 2 , . . . ,
(4.9)
88
CHAPTER 1. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES ON AN INTERVAL
Namely, let
u (x), v(x) being arbitrary functions, u (x) � 0, v(x) � 0. Then it follows from (2.20), even if only formally, that �n (x), 'llf n (x) also satisfy (4.9). This idea is due to Erdelyi [3], who constructed by this method new biorthogonal system in terms of hypergeometric functions �1 and aF'2 based on Jacobi polynomials
�1 being the Gauss hypergeometric function (1.72). He gave other such systems as well. We refer to § 9.2 (note 5.4) and also § 23.2 (note 18.7) in connection with this method in other cases. The investigations of Pacchiarotti and Zanelli [1] and Zanelli [3], concerning fractional derivatives of Legendre and Jacobi polynomials adjoin in a sense to ErdtHyi's idea. Equation (2.20) had earlier been used by Erdelyi [1 , 2] in order to obtain some representations for the Gauss hypergeometric functions, see also similar representations for Appel functions F1 , F2, F4 in Manocha [1), [2).
-
C.M. Joshi [1] used fractional integrals (2.17) and (2.18) in order to obtain integral representations for three Lauricella functions of three variables - Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi [1 , 5.14). 2. 7. The following relation
with
m<
a,
x > xo �- a and
Rn
1 a+n l)(x) + (Ia+n 1)a+ r(a .
,m zo =
_
due to Y. Watanabe [1, p.31], = here we obtain (2.63) if
l(x + h)
=
L: 00
m= - oo
is
zo
m) Ja (x
_
t)a -m - 1 (1)aa+-m - 1 l)(t)dt
the generalization of Taylor's expansion (2.63).
From
-n and xo - a. However, the generalized Taylor series r(!-:!� 1) (D;;++r l)(x) with fractional derivatives was already formally
m
written down by Riemann [1]. The proof of the validity of such an expansion for certain classes of functions was undertaken by Hardy [3) both for finite and infinite a.
2 .8. Another variant of generalizing Taylor's series was suggested by Dzherbashyan and Nersesyan [1], [2]. Namely, let ao = 0, Oi , , am be an increasing sequence of real numbers such that 0 a � a� - 1 � 1, k = 1, 2, Let x > 0. We introduce the notation
<
-
. • .
,m.
• • •
(4.10) and remark that 1) ( a,.) I ¢ 'D�f. l in general. The "fractional derivative" 1) (a ,) I differs from the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative 'D�f. I by a finite sum of power functions as seen from
§ 4. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER
1.
89
(2.68) . This fact allows us to anive at the generalized Taylor expansion
(4.1 1)
(Dzherbashyan and Nersesyan [1 , p.88; 2]) for functions f(x) having all continuous used derivatives. In the cited papers the authors demonstrate the usefulness of introducing the derivatives (4.10) in the problem of evaluating coefficients of the general power series
) ' ak = (u(r(art.,)+aJ ;)(O)
00
f(x) = E ak xa• , k =O
· · 10r · · · obtauu · ·ng the cr1ter1a · of functions m · as we11 as m r. the decomposltion the Dirichlet series. This approach to investigation of functions decomposable in generalized power series or Dirichlet series was further developed by Dzherbashyan and Saakyan [1] . They considered a generalization of Bernstein's theorem for absolutely monotone functions to the case of the �caUed < p > - absolutely monotone functions. The definition of this idea is based on the fractional integra-differentiation of the form Further generalizations of absolutely monotone functions were given in this way by Saakyan [1], [2] and Dzherbashyan and Saakyan [2]. We note also that in the latter papers a generalization of the Taylor expansion was suggested, which was associated with the Mittag-Leffier function and with generalized fractional
(4.10).
n -1 n ( V�� + Aj E)!, j =O
differentiation of the type 0
< p < 1 by Saakyan [3].
p
>
1,
which was ext�nded later on to the case
(3] dealt with the Taylor expansion of the form f(z) = + + E (l>a d f)(zo)(z - zo)a d /r(l + + ak) in the complex plane, the particular case of k = - oo such an expansion being earlier considered by Fabian (3]. We refer also to Osler (6] where a We remark also that Osler
00
Ot
certain integral analogue of the Taylor expansion in the complex plane is given. In § 7.3 below we discuss a certain such integral analogue, different from that considered by Osler (see Remark 7.3) . In connection with the generalization of the Taylor expansion (2.63) , Badalyan (1] obtained a relation of the type (4 . 11) for constructions more complicated than fractional derivatives. 2 .9. The idea of differentiation with respect to the power exponent widely employed by VolteiTa [2] for evaluating integrals of power-logarithmic functions was developed by Rubin [10], [14]. One may follow Rubin (10] and apply fractional integration with respect to {3 in order to evaluate fractional integrals of the functions (x - a)P-1 1n11(1/(x - a)) (for x - a < 1). The paper by Rubin (14] contains the generalization of this approach based on the application of the convolution operation with respect to the variable {3. One may obtain in this way relations for evaluating fractional integrals of functions of the type
Ink t = !nln.... . . h) t, -oo < Ak < oo, {3 > 0. k
(x - a)P-1
TI {Ink x.:a ) >.., , where
k=O
2.10. Love (4] gave sufficient conditions for the existence of the fractional integral (2.38) of purely imaginary order. He showed, for example, that if a function f is integrable over
J t -1 wt (!, t)dt < oo, 6
[0, oo] and the condition
S
>
0,
is satisfied, where
w1 (!, t)
is the integral
modulus of continuity of f (see (13.24) below), then the fractional integral Po� exists for any real 9. Corq.pare this with Theorem 13.5, which contains sufficient conditions for the existence of the fractional derivative l>:+ J. It was also shown by Love [4 ; 5, p.388r that ��� � exists for a 0
J E Lt(a, b) if and only if I�+'' J E AO([a, b]); then Po� ! E Lt(a, b) and the relation I;!' JA� f = J holds almost everywhere on (a, b).
function
90
CHAPTER 1. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES ON AN INTERVAL 2 .11. The estimate (2.72) is a particular case of the inequalities
0, 0
b),
�
0,
g(t) E cm([o,b]), m 1, g(k)( t) � where cx > 11 > and II l iP is the norm in Lp(O, k = 1 , . . . , m - 1, g(m)(t) � -a � 0 (a > in the second inequality). These inequalities were proved by Bukhgeim [1], [2, p.46] and used by him in (2] in the investigation of the inverse problems of reconstructing differential equations by given traces of their solutions. 1]) and let {la } a >O be a family of linear 2.12. Let X = Lp(O, 1), 1 � p oo, or X = operators in X. Is it true that the conditions
0
<
0([0,
j rp(t)dt,
lai[J la+fJ'
�
{ 11 r,o)(x) =
=
0
for r,o(x)
�0
define the family
Ia uniquely
(Ia r,o)(x)
=
so
cx,{3 0, (la r,o)(x) � 0 >
that
� j UK+ r,o)(x) = r!cx > r,o(t) (x - t) a- t dt
(4.12)
0
for all rp E X? The question was put by J. Lew at the Conference on Fractional Calculus in 1974, see Osler (9, p.397]. The paper by Cartwright and McMullen (1] contains in fact a positive answer to , this question under additional assumption that the mapping Ot - Ia is continuous from R� into L(X - X) in any Hausdorff topology. 2.13. We note the paper by Spain [1] who discussed the idea of interpolation of integro-differentiation Ia by the expression
��(
(- 1 ) k rp( k )(x) + � ( - 1 ) k _1_ x t ) k -1 ( t)dt x > a, Ia fP = sin 1I'Ot � , fP L.i L.i a + k ( k - 1 ) ! -k a k=l k=O 11'
cx
based on the interpolation relation
F(a)
=
sin�a�
E
k = - oo
_
( - l23(k) .
However, this approach
was not further developed because of the evident difficulties connected with consideration of the composition Ia 1fJ rp . 2 .14:. Based on the fractional integration operator f a (x) = (I:+ J)(x) Zanelli [1 , 2]
( )
b
y(a)(f ; (a , ]) = 6 b �- o J l hl -1 1 f( t - a ) (x + h) - f( l-a ) (x)ldx which coincides formally with J 1(1>�+ J) (x)ldx . He a a investigated the connection of fractional differentiation 1>�+ ! and of fractional variation y ( a )
introduced the notion of fractional order variation of a function as follows:
with Stieltjes approximating polynomials and certain weighted means. 2.15. Based on (2.53) and (2.54), Penell (1] and Thielman (1] obtained expansions of the integral (1� 2 r,o)(x) into series of Fourier-Bessel type by the known expansion of a function r,o(x) into the series of trigonometric or Bessel functions, respectively.
!
§
4.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER
1.
91
2.16. Let
(od k · · · (op) k xk x] = pFq (o l t ·t · ·. t. op; L f31 · , {3q k=O (f31 ) k • . . (/3q ) k k! be the generalized hypergeometric function (Erdelyi, Magnus , Oberhettinger and Tricomi [1, 4.1]). Misra [1) proved the following Rodrigues type formula F. [-n, 0 1 , • • . , op; x ] p+ 1 q /31 t • • • t /Jf 00
a
X
xat3 -fj'l1)O0t'l+-fj'l xat'l -131 1)O0/l+-fjl [xa • -1 (1 x)n ] ' _
Here Rodrigues type formulae for classical polynomials are contained as particular cases. We also that Koschmieder [2] used fractional derivatives to obtain some properties of the function ,F, . 3.1. The variant of Theorem 3.12 when the weight is not changed, but the Holderian GJ>Onent is variable (see RemMk 3.5) is as follows. Let 1-' 1 p - 1, 0 1-'k p - 1, k = 2, 3, , n - 1, 1-'n > 0 . H 1/p o < 1 + 1/p, the operator I�+ is bounded from Lp ([a, b), p)
note
). mto H0
. .
([a, b); p), where
{
min(a -
if
1-'
-e
if
1-'
1/p, �-£/p), + �-£/p, with 1-' min l-'k t > 0 (KMapetyants and Rubin [2]) . k 2::2 ' �=
=
< <
<
<
. . .
::j;
op - 1, = op - 1,
e
3 .2. Har'dy and Littlewood s Theorem 3.5 has the following analogue for p =
{i
l(r.'+
}
l /t
$ C+C
i
1:
i
with C depending only on o and (a, b) (Flett [3]). A similar' inequality had earlier been proved by Zygmund [1] in the periodic case for Weyl fractional integrals - see § 23.2 (note 19.7) below. 3 .3. Let us consider in more detail the limiting case p = 1/o in Har'dy and Littlewood's theorem 3.5. Har'dy and Littlewood [1] already noted that
101 /+p
n Lr (a, b), r2:: 1 '
The latter is confirmed by the example
but
141/+p (Lp) r[. Loo(a, b).
(4.13)
f = I�f IPe where (4.14)
It is easily shown for this function that and Rubin [4]).
/(x) � c
(In 2/:-z ) 1- .!±!.P
as x -
2/e - 0 (KMapetyants
92
CHAPTER 1. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES ON AN INTERVAL
X C
Relations (4.13) lead to the natural idea of constructing an intennediate space X, L00 C U Lr , containing the range (Lp ) and "close", if possible, to ! ( Lp ) . We mention
I�f
I�
here t� ways of constructing such a space. The first one is based on local properties of functions J from I ( Lp) , while the second one deals with the asymptotic behaviour of Lr-norms of functions J when r - oo. A. Let BMO(a , b) be the space of functions E Lt (a, b) such that r>l
�f
/(x)
1 11 • = where
m il =
sup m il < oo,
(4.15)
Ic(a,b)
l�l J 1/(x) - fJidx,
II
=
l�l J f(x)dx.
(4.16)
I
I
Estimating the nonn (4.15) we may verify that
Such an assertion was apparently first obtained by Peetre [1] in the multidimensional case for Riesz potentials, although a similar result was earlier noted by Stein and Zygmund [3]. We refer to paper by Reimann and Rychener [1] in this connection. As for BMO-spaces (the spaces of bounded mean oscillation) in the case of a finite interval [a, b), one may refer for example to the books by Ka.shin and Saalcyan [1, Ch.5] and Garnett [1 , Ch.5]. B. Karapetyants and Rubin [1) introduced the Banach space X-y (a, b) of functions J (
(
E
n Lr (a, b)
x) ) with the finite nonn sup(r-1'11/llr) and showed that the operator I!� ,
r�l r> l .< oo , is bounded from Lp (a, b) into X'Y (a, b) if "Y
� 1/p' and unbounded if "Y < 1/p' . The proof is based on the fact that = O(r 11P' ) as r - oo. We note that BMO(a, b) (/. X-y (a, b) and X-y (a, b) (/. BMO(a, b) for 0 "Y 1. The first is = + o(1 ) ) as r - oo in the case attested by the example giving the relation = a = 0, b = 1. The example corresponding to the second assertion is given by 1
<
p
III� �IIL,.-Lr
/(x) Jnx
/(x) { (In x- /2 ) 1 =
0
1
1'
for 0 <
for 1 /2
< <
i(I
1 /l r
x< <x<
1 /2, 1.
These examples were suggested by Karapetyants and Rubin [3]. One may find the development of the ideas discussed in § 17.2 (note 13.1) below. 3 .4. Let E Lt (a, b). The simple fact that exists almost everywhere admits the following sharpening: any point where u: J)(x) exists is its (left) Lebesgue point, see + (2.78) (Love [101). In this connection ass also § 17.2 (note 12.6).
/(x)
x,
(1:+ /)(x)
Chapt er 2 . Fract ional Integrals and Derivat ives on the Real Axis and Half- axis The present chapter contains investigations about fractional integrals and derivatives on an infinite interval. The functions under consideration are to be chosen so that the corresponding integrals converge at infinity. We shall deal with functions "vanishing" at infinity in an appropriate manner, e.g. with functions in Lp(R1 ) such that 1 < p < 1/at or in Lp(R1 ; p), when the condition on p may be weakened owing to the weight p( x) , or with weighted Holderian functions vanishing at infinity. Fractional integrals will absolutely converge for such functions. One may treat fractional integrals more widely by considering them as conditionally convergent:
�
1
�
x -
x -
�
Such a treatment will not concern here but we shall deal with it both in the periodic (§ 19, see ( 19.20) for example) and in the non-periodic cases (§ 14.3). See also additional information in § 9.2 (notes 5.1-5.3, 5.10).
§ 5. The Main Properties of Fractional Integrals and Derivatives 5.1. Definitions and elementary properties The fractional integrals given by (2. 17) and (2.18) are easily extended from the case of a finite interval (a, b] to the case of a half-axis or axis. Properly speaking
94
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
definitions (2.17) or (2.18) by themselves may be used on the half-axis ( a , oo ) or respectively due to the variable limit of integration. We shall use the notations of (2.17) and (2.18) for the corresponding half-axis and write
( - oo , b)
z:
1
( la
0<x<
_
oo .
(5.1)
0
We denote fractional integrals on the whole real axis by
(Ja
z:
r (a)
- 00
<X<
00 ,
(5.2)
- oo
a (I_
f (x
- 00
00 .
(5.3)
(5.3) as a convolution:
{I± 'P)(x) = r (l ) Ot
�
f t±- 1
-oo
= r ( ) f t0 - 1
{
where
00
(5 .4)
a- l tf.- 1 = t , 0,
t>O t
Fractional integrals 1±. are defined for functions and 1 $ p < 1/a. Indeed
�
1
f t0- 1
(I't
�
(5.5)
1 r ( ) f t0 -
The existence of the first term may be proved for almost all z for example using
§ 5. THE MAIN PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
95
inequality (1.33), while the second one exists for all x by the Holder inequality 1 .28) when 1 � p < 1/a. In a similar fashion to (2.22) and (2.23) Liouville fractional derivatives
(
z:
1 d f f(t)dt , ('D+a /)(x) = r (1 - a) dx (x - t)a - oo ('D _a f)(x)
=
-
1 d f f(t)dt f(1 - a) dx (t - x)a ' z:
- 00
are introduced in the case 0 <
analogously to
(2.30).
<X<
00 1
a < 1. If a � 1, we set
� J tn - a - 1 I ( X
{ ±1)n ('D±a /){ X) = r (n a) dxn -
(5.6)
00
00
n=
=F t ) dt,
[a] + 1.
(5.7)
0
In the case of the half-line
(0, oo) we consider
� f (x -j(t)dt t) a- n+ l '
1 _ a /)(X ) (1)O+ f ( n - a) dxn
z:
0
(-1)n (/' f f(t)dt . (v a_ f)(x) = r n a) dxn (t - x) a- n + l ( 00
(5.8)
1:
The connection between l!;.cp and l�cp analogous to
QI±_cp = I� Qcp, (Q
(2.19) has the form -oo
< x < oo .
(5.9)
The operators I± satisfy simple rules of commutation with the operators of translation and dilatation. Let us introduce the notation
(r,.cp)(x) = cp(x - h), z, h E Rl ,
(IT 6 cp)(x) = cp (6x), x E R1 , 6 > 0.
(5.10) (5.11)
96
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
It is easily verified that
(5 . 1 2) (5.13) Property
(5 . 13 ) is also valid on the half-axis for the fractional integral I�+
The semigroup property
I� I�
(5. 15 )
is true as in the case of a finite interval. If the function
00
- oo
- oo
00
00
- oo
- oo
j
j f(x)(V+ g)(x)dx = j g(x)(V�f)(x)dx.
(5.16)
(5.17)
are valid. Equation ( 5. 16) may be obtained similarly to the analogous formula (2.20) by directly interchanging the order of integration. Formula (5. 17) follows from ( 5. 1 6 ) by rewriting If.t/; = g, I�
00
j
0
(5. 16 ) '
§ 5. THE MAIN PROPERI'IES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
97
in the notation of (5.1) and
(5.3). Integrals of purely imaginary order o: = i(J are defined similarly to (2.38) :
I
00
d ( +
1
for "sufficiently good" functions. We indicate now some elementary functions evaluated in terms of elementary functions. 1. For
(5.18)
(5.19) where the signs chosen in the right-hand and left-hand sides must be the same. 00 Indeed, I�(ez ) = rla) J e z - ttor- l dt = e z . More generally we have 0
(5.20) which is proved similarly to (5.19) in view of (7.5), obtained in § 1 below. Compare also (5.20) with equations (22.26) and (22.27). 2. Equations
(5.21)
(5.22) follow from (5.20) under the assumption that a � 0, b � 0, a 2 + b 2 > 0,
I�(sin bz) b-or sin (bz =F o:2"") , I�(cosbz) = b-or cos (bz =F o:21r ) . =
(5.23)
98
{ (x - a)P-1
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
3. For
cp(x) =
x > a, Re{J > 0, we have by (2.44) x $ a,
'
0,
(I+cp)(x) =
{
_DUU_ ( x - a) a +,B - 1 , �
0,
x > a, x $ a.
4. If 0 < Rea < ReI' the equations
[
1+a (1 f(J.t) ± ix) �' I-a (xf(J.t) ± i) �'
[
] ]
f(J.t - a) - e± �
(5.24)
=
(5.25)
_
(1 ± ix)�£-a ' f(J.t - a) (x ± i)�£ -a '
are valid with the power functions ( 1 ± ix )�', ( x ± i)�' being understood in the normal way, i.e. as corresponding values of the main branch of the analytic function z�' in the complex plane with the cut along the positive half-axis z
JA - I z I �' e i�£ arg z , e -1'1m+O arg z I z=t +ie ' t>O -- 0 . -
(5.26)
By choosing (5.26) we may write that
(±ix + 1) �' = (1 + x2 ) � e ±i�£arctg x , x E R1 , (x ± i)�' = (1 + x2 ) � e ±i�£arcctg x , X E R1 .
(5.27)
Equation (5.24) may be rewritten as (5.28) We find it convenient to prove equations (5.24) and (5.25) later, at the end of § 7.1. For the moment we remark only that these formulae are deducible one from each other in view of the connection given in (5.9) , provided that we take into account that (1 ± ix)�' l x = - e = e� iwrr l 2 (e ± i)�' by (5.27). Thus it will be sufficient to prove only one of the equations, either (5.24) or (5.25).
5.2. Fractional integrals of Holderian functions Results of this subsection are similar to those of § 3, the difference being in the specialness due to the presence of infinity on the axis R1 or half-axis. We start
§ 5. THE MAIN PROPERI'IES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
with the case of weighted Holderian functions on the half-axis consider fractional integrals
a 'P -_ _1_ zO+ f( a) Ot J_ rp -
1_ _ r (a)
R� = [0, oo] .
- t) 1 - 01 ' J (zrp(t)dt
99
We
:&
0
J
00
:&
(5.29)
rp(t)dt , z > o. (t - z) l -OI
The statement about their Holderian property on the half-axis will be obtained by reducing it to the case of a finite interval via the following lemma.
The transformation y = 1/(z + 1) maps the space H>. (R� ; p), p = p(z), z > 0, onto the space H >. ([o, 1]; r), where Lemma 5.1.
r = r(y) = p[(1 - y)fy],
o
< y < 1.
(5.30)
The lemma's proof may be obtained by direct verification. Note that the change of variable y = 1/(z + 1) transforms the Holderian condition (1.6) into
(1.1).
Theorem 5.1.
Let rp(z) E HSCR�; p), where
p(z) = (1 + z)11 IJ lz - Zk l "" , 0 = Z 1 < Z2 < · · · < Zn < oo n
k= 1
k=
Let also A + a < 1 and A + a < J.lk < A + 1,
(5.31)
2, 3, . . . , n. If
n
1' 1 < A + 1,
JJ
+ L: J.lk < 1 - A, k =1
(5.32)
then IC+ 'P E H� +01 {1l� ; p*). lfA+a < 1' 1 < A+ 1 {or p 1 = 0) or a-A < p+ kE J.lk , +1 then I�rp E H�+ 01 (R�; p*). Here p*(z) = (1 + z) - 201p(z) in both cases. Proof. Theorem 5.1 is reduced to Theorem
3.4 by changing variables. Indeed the
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
100
substitutions y =
1/(z + 1), r = 1/(t + 1) lead to
J z
0
J
00
z
1 tp (!:;t-) d r _0 1 - 11 r1+ cr ( r - y) 1 - a '
(5.33)
1 ) dr tp(t)dt = 1 _ 0 v tp ( 7' Y r1+ a ( y r) 1- cr · (t z p-er
(5.34)
tp(t)dt (z - t) 1 - cr
J
_
'
J
_
_
0
By Lemma 5.1 the change y = n>-([o, 1]; r(y)) with weight
1/(z + 1) maps the space n>-ck� ; p) onto the space n
r( y) = p[(1 - y) fy] = c IT IY - Ylc IJA" , k :O
(5.35)
n E J.lk , and Yk = (1 + z�c) - 1 , k = 1, 2, . . . , n. Applying Yo = 0, JJo = -JJ - lc= 1 Theorem 3.4 to the integrals (5.33) and (5.34) we obtain the proof of the theorem
where
•
after simple transformations.
Corollary 1. In the case p( z) = z" ( 1 + z ) �A the operator
n; +a (R�; p• ), � + a < 1, p*(z) = x" (1 + x)JJ - 2Q if v<
� + 1,
The same is true for the operator /�
J.'
if the
� + < v < � + 1, Q'
+v
< 1 - �.
conditions Q'
Ig+ maps H6 ( R� ; p) into
-
(5.36) are replaced by
� < JJ + v.
We also note a particular case of this corollary, namely if tp(x) E
tp(O) = tp(oo) = 0, then for a < 0, � + a < 1 we have
<J z) - t)l- cr - (1 + x 2cr , J ztp(t)dt z
0
(
(
)
(5.36)
(5.37) n>-([o, oo]),
(5.38)
where <J (z) E n>. + cr ([o, oo]) , <J (O) = <J ( oo) = 0. Statements of the type (5.38) are of interest for functions tp(z) E H>.(R�) without the additional assumptions tp(O) = tp(oo) = 0. For this purpose we
§ 5. THE MAIN PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
denote u( x) = cp( oo) + 11°J�fr�C:: ) , so that u( 0) = l 1�+ ((1 + x) - - a ] = r(t +!)(t + x) by (2.49), we have
101
cp(0), u( oo) =
Since
a a+ l la+ U =
Applying then
Corollary 2. If cp(x) E
H >. ([o, oo]), then
cp(oo) xa+l + �(x) + I (x
__
0
for a > 0, � + a < 1 with �(x) E n>. + a ([o, oo]), �(0) = �(oo) = 0. Now we give a theorem for fractional integrals on the whole real line which is similar to Theorem 5.1 but essentially different due to other conditions on the parameters. Theorem 5.2
.•
Let cp(x) E H$( R1 ; p), where n
p(x) = (1 + x 2 ) t IT lx - x�: l#'" , -oo < Xt < A:=l
· · ·
< Xn < oo.
(5.39)
If � + a < 1, � + a < J.'A: < � + 1, k = 1, . . . , n, and a - � < I' + E J.'A: < 1 - �' A:=l then If.
Proof. In view of (5.9) it is sufficient to consider the fractional integral
Since we may transfer the origin to the point Xt by = I�
f(x)
·
/( - x) E n;+a ( R�; PlP2 ),
=
x#' • , P2 = (1 + x2 ) - � , {J -2a + E I'A: A:= 2 We have taken into account here that 0 < c1 � P •1:J>;:(�) � c2 < oo for x E R� . The assertion that / (x) e n; + a (R� ; p*) is contained in Theorem 5.1. Further for x > 0 we have •
/( - x)
=
where
1 r(a)
Pl
n
=
t:
0
l-a
.
·
102
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
The first term here belongs to H� + 01 (R�; Pl P2 ) by Theorem 5.1 as well. Let us denote the second term by G(x). It is an infinitely differentiable function for 0 < x < oo. In order to specify its behaviour when x --+ 0 and x --+ oo, we set
r (cr)G(x) =
f2 0
cp(t)dt
(t + x) l - 01
00
+f 2
cp(t)dt
(t + x) l - OI
=
G1 (x) + G2 (x).
For 0 5 x 5 1 we see that G(x) E H� + 01 ([0, 1]; p l ) by Lemma 3.1 for G 1 (x) and by the infinite differentiability of G2 (x). For x � 1 it is easy to show that G1 (x) E H� +01([1, oo]; p 1 p2 ) taking into account the infinite differentiability of G1 (x) for x � 1 and the obvious behaviour of G1 (1/y) in a neighbourhood of the point y = 0. As for G2 (x), x � 1, we have after the substitution t = r - 1 + 1 , x = y - 1 - 1 that 00
f
cp(t)dt
(t + x ) l - 01
_ = Y 1 01
1
j (r¢(+r)dr y) l - 01 ' 0
(5.40)
2 1 where 1/J(r) = r - - 01cp (� ) E H� ([O, 1 ]; p3 ), by Lemma 5.1 and p3(r) = r1 +01p ( 1-; T ) = r 1 + 01+1Ao p4 (r) with weight p4 (r) not already being "attached" to n the point T = 0, and Po = -p PI: (see (5.35)). Since r1+01+ 1Ao ,P(r) e H � ([O, 1]) =l l: and r1 + 01+ 1Ao ,P( T ) I T =O = 0, we see that 1 1/J( T ) I 5 CT _ .., , "'( = 1 + a + Po - �, in the neighbourhood of the point T = 0. Applying Lemma 3.1 with {3 = � (which is
E
possible under the condition a - � < -p 0 < 1 - �) we see that the right-hand side of (5.40) belongs to H� + 01 ([0, 1]; y2 01+ 1Ao p4 (y)) if we take into account its infinite differentiability for y > 0. Then the left hand side belongs to H� + 01 (R� ; p* (x)) by Lemma 5. 1. • Remark 5.1. Some results on mapping properties of fractional integrals in the
spaces of smooth functions on the axis or half-axis may be found in § 8.2, 8.4.
5.3. Fractional integrals of summable functions We consider here fractional integrals of functions cp E Lp , given on the axis or half-axis. The difference from the case of a finite interval is the following. In the case of a finite interval the fractional integration operators were defined (see § 3. 3 ) on any space Lp , 1 5 p $ oo, and mapped Lp , 1 < p < oo, into L9 with any q such that 1 5 q 5 p/(1 - crp) when crp < 1 and 1 $ q < oo when crp � 1. But for the case of the axis or half-axis these operators are well defined for 1 5 p < 1/cr and may map Lp into £9 for 1 < p < 1/cr and q = p(1 - crp) only. More exactly, the Hardy-Littlewood Theorem 3.5 in the case of the whole axis holds in the following form.
§ 5. THE MAIN PROPERI'IES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
103
Let 1 � p � oo, 1 � q � oo, a > 0. Operators I± are bounded from Lp (R1 ) to L9(R1 ) if and only if O < a < 1, 1 < p < 1/a and q = p/{1 - ap).
Theorem 5.3.
We omit the proof of this theorem as well as that of Theorem 3.5 (see references in § 9) and demonstrate here only the simple proof of the necessity of conditions a E {0, 1), p E {1, 1/a), q = p/{1 - ap). Let II I+ cpll 9 � cllcpllp · Then II I.�ll.s cpll 9 � cll ll.s cpllp as well, ll.s being the operator (5.11 ) . By (5.13) and the equality II IT .s cpllp = 6 - 1 /P II cpllp we obtain II I+ cpll 9 � cc5 a + t - � llcpllp · Letting c5 to tend to 0 and to oo, we note that this inequality may be valid only for 1/q = 1/p - a. Since q > 0 we have p < 1/ a. It remains to exclude the case p = 1. The function
cp( z) =
{1
"i
0,
I n_..., 1 , "i
0 < z < !, > 1, z ¢ (0, 1/2), 1
(5.41)
is an example of a function in L 1 (R1 ) such that (I+cp)(z) ¢ L 1/(1 - a) (R1 ) if 1 < 1 < 2 - a. Indeed for 0 < z < 1/2 we have
(5.42) so I+cp E L 1 /( 1 -a) (R1 ) only when {1 - 1)/(2 - a) > 1, i.e. 1 > 2 - a. It is evident that Theorem 5.3 is valid also for fractional integrals (5.29) on the half-axis (0, oo) . Some information for the case p = 1 may be found in Theorem 5.6. We give the following weighted variant of Theorem 5.3 for the case of the half-axis. Theorem 5.4.
Let 1 � p < oo,
1 0 < a < m + p-,
0 � m � a,
q = 1 - (ap- m)p
(5.43)
with m � 0 for p = 1. Then operators 1�, IC+ are bounded from Lp (R� ; z") into L9(R� ; z"), 11 = (pfp - m)q:
{ I00
z" lecp)( z) l 9 dz
} { I00 1/ q
S K
zPicp(z) i"dz
}
1 /p
(5.44)
104
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
(similarly for IC+ cp), where p < p - 1 /or the operator 10+ and p > Qp - 1 /or the operator I� . The statement of Theorem 5.4 for operator IC+ was earlier proved in Theorem 3.7 and it may be obtained for I� from its validity for 10+ by substituting 1/z = y, y- l - a cp(z) = 'Pt(Y), Pt = -p + p + Qp - 2, lit = -11 - 2 + (1 - Q)q in view of the equality (IC+ cp) (z) = y 1-a ( I�cpt )(y). Let us note the important particular cases of Theorem 5.4. The case p = 0, m = 0 leads to Theorem 5.3, while the case p = 0, m = Q gives the inequalities K
00
00
j zaP I(I�cp)(z) IPdz � P j jcp(z) jPdz, 0
1 � p < 1/ Q,
00
0
0
< Q < 1; KP
00
j zaP I (I0+ cp)(z) IP dz � j jcp(z) jPdz, 0
(5.45)
0
(5.46)
1 < p < oo, Q > 0, known as Hardy inequalitie.�. One may also obtain these inequalities independently of Theorem 5.4 by using Theorem 1.5 by limiting oneself to the condition 1 < p < 1/Q in (5.45). Theorem 1.5 gives herein the value of the constant K: K=r K= r
G ) / G) (�) jr ( �) -o
r
·
o+
for the inequalities (5.45) and (5.46) respectively. It is not difficult t o show that these constants are sharp. We find it convenient to single out the case m = Q (i.e. the case q = p) in Theorem 5.4 by rephrasing it (after the notational change pfp = - '"( , cp(z) = z7 /(z)) in the following way. The operators zP I�z-r and zfJ IC+ z-r, Q 0, are bounded from Lp(R�) into
>
105
§ 5. THE MAIN PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
L, (R� ; z -.P(a+.8 +"Y ) ), p � 00
J 0
1, if (a + ;)p < 1 and (; + 1)p > 1 respectively:
z -(a+.8 +"Y ).P i z.8 I�z"Y /(z)l'dz :5 K.P
J 1/(z)l'dz, 00
(5.45')
0
1 :5 p < oo , (a + ;)p < 1, a > 0;
00
00
j z-(a+.8+"Y).P iz.8I0+ z"Y /(z)l'dz ::; K' j 1 /(z)l'dz, 0
(5.46')
0
1 :5 p < oo , (; + 1)p > 1, a > 0.
In particular, the operators z.8 I�z"Y and z.8 IC+ z"Y are bounded in L ( R�) in the case a + {J + ; = 0 under the above conditions. The inequalities (5.45') and (5.46') with z-pRe (a +P +"Y ) instead of z -(a +,8 +-y )p are valid for complex values of a, {J, ; also if pRe(a + ; ) < 1 and p(Re; + 1) > 1 respectively, in both the following cases Rea > 0, 1 :5 p < oo or Rea = 0, a =I 0, 1 < p < oo . We observe that the purely imaginary case a = i(J may be considered by representing z -"Y ��� z"Y in the form ��� + (z - "Y ��� z"Y - ��� ) where the first term may be treated by Lemma 8.2 and the second one by Theorem 1.5. In the bounding cases of restrictions to inequalities (5.45' ) and (5.46) when p = 1 and ; = 1 - a or ; 0 respectively, the integrals on the left-hand side of these inequalities may diverge. In these cases we arrive at the inequalities (3.17"') and (3.17") instead of (5.45') and (5.46'). The inequalities (3.17"') and (3.17") with A = 0 show in particular that the operator z - 1 J�z l - a is bounded from L 1 ((b, oo) ; In !:p-z) into L 1 (b, oo) , and z -a 10+ is bounded from £ 1 ((0, b); In �) into £ 1 (0, b), 0 < b < oo . We give now without proof the generalization of Theorem 5.4 for the case of a general power weight (5.39). We consider z E 0 where 0 may be the half-axis R� ,
=
or axis R1 . In the case 0 � R� we set
0 = Z l < • · · < Zn <
00 .
Let us denote for l' k < ap for
1, l'k � ap - 1,E�c > 0.
(5.47)
106
Let JJo =
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
-p -
JJ I - · · · - JJn · We also let
11�) =
_
p1 q
P
_
t
k =2
liJc
_
{ eJJoq/- qpfp'
for JJo > 1 - p, for JJo ::; 1 - p, e >
0,
{
for JJo > 1 - p, for JJo ::; 1 - p , e >
0,
JJoq /p 1100(2) = -mq - � L...J liJc e - qfp' k= l
in order to define weighted functions of the type
_
r_ (z) -
{
(1 + z) "i!>
r+ (z)
(5.39):
ll lz - z�c l""
k= l
.
for for
0 = R�, 0 = R1 .
Let 1 < p < oo, 0 ::; m ::; a, 0 < a < m + 1/p, and let p(z) be the weight (5.39) satisfying condition (5.47) in the case of the half-line. Let
Theorem 5.5.
JJ k < p - 1 ,
k = 2, 3, . . . , n .
(5.48)
If in addition to (5.48) we also have JJ l < p - 1, then the operator Ig+ is bounded from Lp (R� , p) into L9(R� , r+ ) · If in addition to (5.48) we have that JJ < 1 - ap, then I� is bounded from Lp (R� , p) into L9(R� , r- ). Finally the operators I± are bounded from Lp (R1 , p) into L 9 (R1 , r± ) if in addition to (5.48) we have that JJ 1 < p - 1, JJo < 1 - ap.
§ 5. THE MAIN PROPERI'IES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
107
We note the particularly useful case of Theorem 5.5: �
{_l lzi" I(I.+
•
� •
,
(5.49)
1 < p < oo, exp - 1 < p < p - 1, 1 1 1 + v l + p - ex. 1 p p- - ex -< -q -< p- ' q = --
--
An inequality similar to (5.45) is valid in the case of the whole axis R1 as well, namely
1 < p < 1/ex.
(5.50)
This is contained in Theorem 5.5, but may be obtained also with aid of Theorem 1.5 by passing to the half-axis. We prove now a simple theorem, which applies to the case p = 1 and is useful in ·applications. Theorem 5.6.
p(x) = (1 x)", +
f(x) Ig+rp f(x) = I�rp. If rp(x)
= Let ex - 1 < p � 0, then
or
{ l(l + z)"l/(z)l'dz} $ 1(1 + z)"l
Let
/(z) I�rp =
and let
A be the left-hand side of (5.51).
) r ( r A $ f (�) ! I'P(t ) l ! (1 + z)"(t z) (a -t) dz oo
t
by the generalized Minkowsky inequality
L 1 (R� ; p),
K
(5.51)
where 1 � r < 1/(1 - ex) and v = r(1 - ex + JJ) - 1 except the case J.& = 0, when v < r(1 - ex) - 1. Proof.
E
-
(1.33).
f(x) Ig+rp, =
We have
1/
The substitution
dt
x=
t - (1 + t)e
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
108
gives
t
J (1
+ z ) " (t
- z ) (a-l )rdz =
(1
+ t) JJ r
t/(t+ l)
J (1 - ete
+ t) JJ r
0
0
-1
1)r -1.
and (a > Thus the above estimate for in view of the inequalities 11 > The case /(z) = IC+ cp is treated similarly, the only difference being that we deal with the integral
A leads to (5.51).
/t <1 00
+
z) " ( z - t)< a - l)r dz =
(1
+ t) " + l +(a - l)r
+
J e
0
•
cte.
5.6 is valid on the axis also in the case of the weight (1 jz i)P , where a - 1 < I' 5 0, 11 = r(1 - a + p) - 1 if I' :f: 0 and 11 < r(1 - a) - 1 if I' = 0. The proof is similar. +
Remark 5.2. Theorem
We conclude this subsection by constructing a space of functions summable on the axis R 1 which is invariant with respect to fractional integration. The spaces or with a power weight do not possess this property. We introduce the space with exponential weight by defining the norm
Lp Lp (p) Lp ,w
l i'PII L
•.•
{=
_l
00
} 1p , , -w' i cp(t) i' dt /
1 5p<
00 .
(5.52)
Cw = Cw (R1 ) the space of functions cp(t) such that e -wt cp(t) E C(R1 ), ll cpllc.., = max e -w' lcp(t)l and for brevity set Lp ,w = Cw in the case p = oo.
We denote also by Theorem 5. 7.
The operators 1± , a > 0, are bounded in Lp ,w 1
1 5 p < oo,
p = oo,
1 5 p 5 oo, and
(5.53)
and if ±w > 0, respectively.
(5.54)
§ 5. THE MAIN PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Proof.
109
For w > 0 we have
00
J
= e - 1f t a - l dt ll
(5.55)
0
In order to obtain (5.54) it remains for us to observe that 11 1� 11 £ 1 ,.., = lwl - a ii <J' II £ 1 ,.., for non-negative functions
5.4. The Marchand fractional derivative Liouville's fractional derivatives (5.6) on the axis R1 may be reduced in general to a more convenient form than (5.6). Let us suppose temporarily that a function f(z ) is sufficiently "good" , for example /(z) is continuously differentiable and with its derivative, /'(z), vanishes at infinity as l z l a - l - c , c > 0. We suppose that 0 < o: < 1 . We have
� a) ! J r af(z - t)dt 00
(V'j_f)(z) = f(l
0
00
= f(l
� a) J ,-a /'(z - t)dt 0
= r(l a:_
o:
)
00
0
t
J !'(x - t)dt J e�a 00
J
o:
= r(l - o: )
0
Let us denote o:
(D +a f)(x ) = r(l - ) o:
o:
= r(l -
00
o:
f( z) - f(z - e) df. e l +a
00
J 0
(5.56)
z:
f( z) - /(z - t) dt t l +a
f(z) - f(t) j ) (z - t) 1+a dt, - oo
(5.57)
110
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
so D�.f = V+f for sufficiently "good" functions f(x). Similar transformations lead to the expression
(D a /)(x) = -
V+f · fractional derivatives. which replaces
a f ( 1 - a)
J f(x) -tl+cxf(x + t) 00
0
'
-oo < x < oo,
Constructions (5.57) and (5.58) will be called
(5.58)
Marchaud
It is clear that integrals (5.57) and (5.58) exist under more general assumptions for the function f(x): the above restrictions were needed in order to realize the simple transformation (5.56) from V+f to D+f · It is evident that integrals (5.57) and (5.58) exist for example for bounded functions satisfying the local Holder condition of order � > a. This may be weakened to � = a if one takes functions j( X ) belonging locally to the space Hcx , - a , a > 1 and bounded at infinity. It is natural to ask the question whether Vf.f = D+f not only for "sufficiently good" functions, but also for all those functions f(x) for which V+f and D+J exist (almost everywhere for example) . Does D+J exist if V+f exists and vice versa? The second question may be answered in the negative at once: D+J exists for the function f(x) = const and D±f = 0, while V±f does not exist for f(x) = const . In general, let f(x) be locally Holderian of order � > a and nonvanishing at infinity, for example, tending to a constant or even growing as lxl a- e . Then D+J exists. This is not true for V+f which requires better behaviour of f( x) at infinity. The answer to the first question is more difficult at least because the domains of defini"tion of the operators V+f and D�.f prove to be different from each other. This difference is closely connected with the problem of inversion of fractional integrals. Which version
(!)
is more natural? The second version has already been used in the case of a finite interval (see § 2.6). In the case of the axis R1 , the situation is as follows: if cp E then the first version will work for all admissible values of p, 1 � p < 1/ a, while the second version fits the case p = 1 only (see § 6.2 below) . So Marchand fractional derivatives D+f are more convenient on the R 1 than Liouville fractional derivatives V+f as they allow more freedom for f(x) at infinity. It goes without saying that the differences between V+f and D+J discussed above and connected with their behaviour at infinity will not be present in the case of a finite interval. In future Marchand fractional derivatives for "not very good" functions f(x)
Lp ,
will
§ 5. THE MAIN PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
111
be understood to be conditionally convergent. Namely, let
(Da± ,e f)(x)
=
a
r(1 - a)
Then by definition
J f(x)-tl+fax 00
(
=f
t) dt.
(5.59)
£
(5.60) where the character of the convergence will be defined by the problems under consideration. Thus, we shall treat the passage to a limit in (5.60) in the norm of the space Lp while studying the inversion = E Lp , in § 6.2. The expressions in (5.59) will be termed truncated Marchaud fractional
D�J±
derivatives.
Let us note the properties of Marchaud fractional derivatives similar to (5.9), (5.12) and (5.13): (5.61) (5.62) Remark 5.3. One may obtain Marchaud fractional derivatives on the half-axis (0, oo) analogously to the equalities (5.56) - (5.58). The derivative
(1>�/)(x) / x,
(D�/)(x), x
is transformed to > 0, without changes, but instead of (Vg+ )( ) z > 0, we obtain, following (5.56):
('Doa+ f)(x) = r(1 1- a) /X(00) + r(1 1- a) J /'(Xt0- t) X
dt
0
=
f(x)
r(1 - a ) x0
a
X
- t) dt, + r(1 - a ) j f(x) -t l+f(x a 0
so
a f(x ) naO+ !':!! - r(1 - a ) z 0 + r(1 - a ) z > 0,
0<
J X
0
a < 1,
f( x ) - f(t) dt ( z - t) l + a '
(5.63)
112
CHAPTER 2 . FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
which plays the role of the "left-hand sided" Marchand derivative on the half-axis { 0 , oo ) . Constructions similar to (5.63) will be used on the finite interval too - see § 13. 1 . As for Marchand fractional derivatives of order a > 1 we shall consider them in § 5.6 below.
5.5� The finite part of integrals due to Hadamard Comparing the Marchand fractional derivative D ± f =
r(l�a) J J (�1R:J(�) dt with 00
0
fractional integrals I±f, we see that D ± f is formally obtained from l±f if we replace a by - a . Subtraction of f(x) here provides the convergence of the integral. Thus D ± f are closely connected with ideas concerning divergent integrals. We elaborate on some of these ideas. Definition 5.1. Let a function 4>(t) be integrable on an interval c < t < A for any A > 0 and 0 < € < A. The function 4>(t) is said to possess the Hadamard property at the point t = 0 if there exist constants ak , b and A k > 0 such that A
N
j 4>(t)dt = L
k =l
�
a k €-).,.
+ b ln � + J0 (c) ,
{5.64)
where e-o lim J0 {c) exists and is finite. By definition A
p.f.
j 4>(t)dt
= lim Jo (c) . e-o
0
(5.65)
The limit (5.65) is called a finite part (partie finie) of the divergent integral J 4>(t)dt in the Hadamard sense or simply an integral in the Hadamard sense. The 0 constructive realization of the function J0 (c) is sometimes called a regularization A of the integral J 4>(t)dt. 0 It is not difficult to see that constants a k , b, A k in (5.64) do not depend on A. If 4>(t) is integrable at infinity, by definition we put A
p.f.
A
J 4>(t)dt = p.f. J 4>(t)dt + J 4>(t)dt oo
0
0
oo
A
(5.66)
113
§ 5. THE MAIN PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
and it easy to see that this definition does not depend on the choice of .
Now we return to
Di. / and consider the divergent
integral
next lemma holds.
A.
J J(:i+2dt . 00
0
The
Let 0 < a < 1 and let /(z) be locally Holderian of order ..\ > a . Then the function c)(t) = /(z - t)t - 1 -a possesses the Hadamard property at the point t = 0 for each z and if 1/(t)l :::;; cltl a-�, e > 0, as t --+ -oo, then �ma 5.2.
f
00
00
f(z - t) dt = f(z - t) - /(z) dt. p. . J t 1+a J t 1+a 0
The
0
proof of this lemma may be obtained by direct verification of condition (5.64)
and definitions (5.65) and (5.66) . Lemma 5.2 states that
D±f = p.f.l± a /,
0 < a < 1.
(5.67)
One may also say that (D±f)(z) represents for any z the analytic continuation of the function (l± a /)(z) from the half-plane Also this continuation is extended to the half-plane < for the functions /(z) mentioned in Lemma 5.2. This follows from the analyticity of the functions c) 1 (a) = If} = l'±a f in the half-planes and > respectively (for sufficiently "good" functions and from the coincidence of their boundary values: = limo c) ( ) = .P£m a f. limo
Rea ..\
�2 (a) Rea- + �t( a)
Re a- The conclusion D�+ /
/) 2a
Re a < 0.
Re a 0, Re a < 0
0 < a < 1 , similar to (5.67) is valid also for
= p.f.IO: /, the Marchand fractional derivative (5.63).
The interpretation of D±f in (5.67) indicates the way how one may make Marchand derivatives meaningful for � 1. For this purpose we give the a regularization of the divergent integral I+ in the next lemma.
a
/, a > 0,
Let locally /(z) E em and let f(m) (z ) satisfy locally the Holder condition of order .\ , 0 ::=;; ..\ < 1 . Then the function � (t) f(z - t)t - 1 - a possesses the Hadamard property at the point t 0 for any z if Re a < m + ..\. If also
Lemma 5.3.
=
=
CHAPTER 2 . FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS O N THE REAL AXIS
114
1 / (t ) l � clt l a- e
for t -+ -oo, then
m 1 ( -1)A: it· j(A:) (z) t) f(z E j t ) 1 1 j ( x f A:=O = p.f. dt r(-a) t 1 + ct dt r(-a) t 1+a oo
•
0
0
00
1 j f(x - t) dt + + -r(-a)
0
t1+a
m ( - 1) A: --
�
A:- 0
k!
(5.68)
f( A:) (z)
r(-a)(k - a) '
where Re a < m + �' a =/= 0, 1 , 2, . . . The
proof of this lemma is obtained by direct verification.
m = [a] the equality (5.68) may be rewritten as
We note that after the choice follows
. f(x - t) - E < -A:t') f(A:) (z) j f(x t) 1 1 A:=O · p.f. dt, r(-a) t 1 +a dt = r ( - a ) j t 1 +ct oo
oo
0
(a]
•
0
a =I= 0 , 1 , 2, . . . ,
(5.68')
where the integral on the right-hand side converges absolutely for the functions mentioned in Lemma 5.3. Result (5.68') has an advantage over (5.68) in being more compact. In view of (5.67) and of the analyticity of the right-hand side in (5.68) with respect to a, it is natural to use (5.68) for defining the fractional derivative of order a, Re a > 0. Let us show that such a definition agrees well with the definition (5.7) in the case of sufficiently "good" functions f.
Let f(x) satisfy the assumptions of Lemma 5.3 with m � [a] + 1 . Then the Liouville fractional derivative Vi.! coincides with (5.68) for any a such that Rea > 0, a =/= 1, 2, . . .
Theorem 5.8.
Proof. Let /3 = a - n + 1, n = [a] + 1 (0 < /3 < 1) in correspondence with For the "truncated" Liouville derivative we have z- e
f
dx" .!!_ -oo
f(t)dt = ( (z - t )P
_
1 )" (/3) n -
f
00
e
(5.7).
- 1 ( -1 ) 1c (/3) �: (n 1 lc f(z - t)dt + n""" + tn P LJ cA:+P / - - ) (z c ) ' A: =O _
(5.69)
1 15
§ 5. THE MAIN PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
which may be .proved by direct differentiation of the left-hand side integral. Regularizing the right-hand side integral a.s in (5.68), we obtain
oo /(z - t)dt /1 [/(z - t) - � (-1)k (t - e)k/(k) (z - e)] ..!!!___ tn+P J tn+P =O kLJ =
k!
e
e
(5.70)
with the designation
1
a�:(e) = eP+ k J (t - e )"- 1 - k t - n - P dt = £
. 1-•
J en- 1- k (e + 1)-n-Pde. 0
Substituting (5.70) into (5.69) we arrive at the equality
oo J
- t ) dt + n�1 ( -1) k /(n - k - 1) (z - e + f(z LJ tn+P k = O e k +P 1
) [(a)k - (n
. 00 00 We have a�:(e) = f en - 1 - 1: (1 + e) - n - P c.te - f 0
. 1 -•
JJ
(/3),. a�: e - k - 1) I ( ·
en - k - 1 (1 + e) - n - P de.
>] } .
Here the first
integral is easily reduced to the beta function. Changing the variable e + 1 in the second integral, we obtain
So the second square bracket in
(5.71) is equal to
(5.71) =
1/et
116
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
Then passage to the limit in (5.71) as e --+ 0 is easily realized. So we have that the Liouville fractional derivative
indeed coincides with the right-hand side of (5.68) taking into account that ( - 1 )n (,B)n = r( n - ct ) /f( ct) by (1.46) and (1.47) . • -
5.6. Properties of finite differences and Marchaud fractional derivatives of order a > 1 Equations (5.57) and (5.58), defining Marchaud fractional derivatives, may be extended to the case > 1. One of the ways which comes to mind is to procede in a similar fashion to (5.7) by putting and introduce
a
a = n + {a }, n = [a]
It is possible however to choose another way by in� roducing differences of higher order, that is, I > 1 in (5.57) and (5.58) instead of the first order difference. We shall elaborate on this latter way. It will be preferable in some aspects because it shows directly the analytic dependence of D+f on the parameter ct. Firstly we consider some simple properties of finite differences. In terms of the translation Th we introduce
( dL /)(z) (E - TJ. )1 f =
which is said to be a finite
�(-1)1 G) /(z - kh), I
=
(5.72)
difference of order I of a function /(z) with a step h
and with center at the point z .
We shall need the following function of the parameter
a: (5.73)
It arises as a finite difference of the power function:
(� �/)(0)
=
-A,(ct) for
117
§ 5. THE MAIN PROPERI'IES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
/(z) = l z l a . The following property of this function:
A,(a) = 0 for a = 1, 2, . . . , 1 - 1 ,
(5.74)
will be important for us. It follows from the obvious equality
A1(m) = -
( !r (1 - z)'l�=l '
(5.74' )
•
As for non-integer values of a, it may be shown that A 1 (a) -:/; 0 for 1, see below and Lemma in Chapter 5. a -:/;
1, 2 , . . . , 1 -
a
(5.8 1) 26.1 Lemma 5.4. Let /(z) E cm (R1 ) and let I � m. Then 1 m h - k km (k1 ) J<m> (z - khu)du. ! m (-1) (�� /)(z) = (m - 1)! (1 - u)m- 1 � LJ k=O O I
E
R1 ,
(5.75)
Proof. By Taylor's expansion (with the remainder in the integral form) we have
1 ( -kh)m (h) i ) ( /(z - kh) E �, ' / (z) + (m - 1).l 1(1 - u)m - 1 /(m) (z - khu)du. =
. _0
0
a.
·-
So for the differences (5.72) we obtain the equality
which yields (5.75) in view of (5.74). Corollary 1.
If f(z)
E
cm (R1 ) and
•
J<m>(z) is bounded, then
1 ( ��/)( z)l � clhlm
sup 1/(m ) (z)l, 1:
I�
m,
(5.76)
116
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
Then passage to the limit in (5.71) as e --+ is easily realized. So we have that the Liouville fractional derivative
0
00
'D+f = r(n � a) ::n J f(:e - t ) cfl dt 0
(-1)n (P) n = r(n - a)/r( - a) by (1 .46) and (1 .47). •
indeed coincides with the right-hand side of (5.68) taking into account that
5.6. Properties of finite differences and Marchaud fractional derivatives of order a > 1 Equations (5.57) and (5.58), defining Marchaud fractional derivatives, may be extended to the case a > 1. One of the ways which comes to mind is to procede in a similar fashion to (5.7) by putting a = n + {a}, n = [a] and introduce
n f(n ) (X) - f(n ) (X - t ) dt. D+ f - dxd n D {+0} I - r(l{a} J t l + { a} - {a} 0 0
_
00
_
It is possible however to choose another way by in� roducing differences of higher order, that is, I > 1 in (5.57) and (5.58) instead of the first order difference. We shall elaborate on this latter way. It will be preferable in some aspects because it shows directly the analytic dependence of D i./ on the parameter a. Firstly we consider some simple properties of finite differences. In terms of the translation Th we introduce
( .O.L f)(z) = (E - TJ. )1! =
�( - l)i G) /(z - kh), l
(5.72)
which is said to be a finite
difference of order I of a function f(x) with a step h and with center at the point x. We shall need the following function of the parameter a: (5.73)
It arises as a finite difference of the power function:
(�i/)(0)
=
-A,(a)
for
§ 5. THE MAIN PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
117
f(x) = l z lcr . The following property of this function: A,(a) = 0 for a = 1 , 2,
. . . ,
1 1 -
,
(5.74)
will be important for us. It follows from the obvious equality
( )
d m (1 - x) ' , A1 (m) = - x dx l�= 1 . As for non-integer values of a, it may be shown that A 1 (a) :f= 0 for a :f= 1 , 2, . . . , 1 -J, see (5.81) below and Lemma 26.1 in Chapter 5. Lemma 5.4.
(5.74')
a E R1 ,
Let f(x) E cm (R1 ) and let I � m. Then
Proof. By Taylor's expansion (with the remainder in the integral form) we have
1 m m m - 1 ( kh)i m ) ( kh ( ) i 1 ( 1 / (x) + f(x - kh) = L -T-(m _ 1) .1 (1 - u) - / ) (x - khu)du . •. = 0 a. 0 So for the differences (5.72) we obtain the equality
( �� /)(x)
m-1 ( L -.�)' /(i)(z)A,(i) i:O ·
= -
I.
which yields (5.75) in view of (5. 74). Corollary 1.
•
If f(x) E cm (R1 ) and f(m > (x) is bounded, then 1 ( �� /)(x) l � clhlm sup IJ<m> (x) l , l � m, �
(5.76)
120
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
5.7. C onnection with fractional powers of operators The operator 'Di. of fractional differentiation may ·be considered as a fractional power of the differentiation operator: (5.82) under the appropriate interpretation of fractional power of an operator. In fact this was the main model in mind in the development of the abstract theory of fractional powers in Banach spaces. We refer the reader who wishes to become more familiar with this theory to the books by Krasnosel'skii, Zabreiko et al. [1) and by Yosida [1]. We mention only very briefly the simplest definitions in this theory and show that they include the case of fractional integro-differentiation in a suitable setting. Let X be a Banach space and let {T, } , t � 0, be a strongly continuous semigroup in X (see Definition 2.5). The operator
A = t -O+ lim !(r, - E) t
(5.83)
( X)
is said to be a generator (or infinitesimal operator) of the semigroup Tt . It is known (see e.g. Dunford and Schwartz's book [1], p.660) that the domain D(A) of the operator A is dense in X and that A is a closed operator. The equality Tt = e tA is valid, at the least formally, the exact meaning being T, = lim e tA" , h- o Ah = t (Th - E)) . We shall consider fractional powers ( -A) a for operators A, which are generators of strongly continuous semigroups. A positive power of an operator A is defined by the formula 00
( -A) a 'P = r ( �Ot) J c a- '(T,
(5.84)
0
0
< a < 1, cp E D(A),
compared with the Marchand formula (5.57). The integral of a function of scalar argument t with values in a Banach space is understood here as a Bochner integral - see for example the book by Hille, Phillips [1, Ch.III, Section 1] about the latter notion. Equation (5.84) is usually referred to as Balakrishnan's formula. When a � 1 we may define the fractional power ( - A) a , following (5.80), by
121
§ 5. THE MAIN PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
bhe equality
( -A)0
1 - t- l- a ( E - T,)1
(5.85)
0
where E is the identity operator, I > o: and x( o: , I) is the constant (5.81). A negative power of the operator -A may be defined for 0 < o: < by the equality
(-A)0 cp =
00
r(�) j ta-1 T,cpdt,
1
(5.86)
0
but the difference with (5.84) is here in the fact that the integral (5.86) may prove to be divergent at infinity, unless additional assumptions on the semigroup 1t are made. A simple condition providing convergence of this integral for all o: > 0 is (5.87) It is clear that in order to realize (5.82) we must represent the operator d/dz as the generator of a semigroup 1t which in view of (5.83) is the semigroup of the translation operators:
A
=
(Tt /)(z)
= /(z - t).
(5.88)
The problem, however, is how to choose the space X so that the semigroup Tt is strongly continuous and (5.87) is satisfied. The spaces Lp(R1 ), C(R1 ) do not match this intent since ll 1t II = for them. We shall use the spaces Lp,w , Cw for this purpose (see Theorem 5.7 above).
1
The semigroup (5. 88} is strongly continuous in the space Lp,w(R1 ), 1 :5 p :5 oo , and
Lemma 5.5.
IIT.t II L p,w -- e - -:- ' The
1
1 :5 p < oo ;
I I Tt l i e..,
=
e -wt ·
proof of the Lemma may be obtained by direct verification.
Lemma 5.5 allows us to state that the integral (5.86) converges in the norm of the space Lp,w with w > 0 and from (5.86) we have
122
CHAPTER
2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
where cp E Lp,w 1 ::; p ::; oo , w > 0, and the above mentioned Lp,w (at infinity) of the integral is implied. As for (5.84), we obtain
(.!!_dx_)
Q'
00
1 _ cp(x - t) -
_
-
convergence
_
0
where cp E D(A) = {cp(t) :
1.
We may
§ 6. Representation of Functions by Fractional Integrals of Lp-Functions In § 5.3 we have considered fractional integrals l±_cp of functions
Let us denote the images of the fractional integration operators by I± ( Lp) :
0 < a < 1,
1 ::; p < 1 /a.
In reality they coincide with each other if 1 < p < 1/a and we denote {6.1) but we find it convenient to put off the proof of this coincidence until § 1 1 .2. By Theorem 5.3 {6.2) and by Hardy's inequality {5.45) {6.3)
§ 6. REPRESENTATION BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF Lp-FUNCTIONS
1 23
l.et us note that
The first is obvious, while the second is illustrated by the example of the function which is equal to f(x) lx - 1 / ln - 1 /P l x l for l xl > 2 and to f(x) 0 for lxl < 2. The imbeddings (6.2), (6.3) together with (6.4) mean that
= l q
=
(6.5)
So,
in view of Theorem 5.3, the space Ia (Lp ) does not coincide with any space Lr ( R 1 ), 1 5 r 5 oo. It does not coincide with any space Lr ( R1 ; p), either. Therefore the space I a (Lp ) needs to be characterized. Subsection § 6.3 is devoted to this purpose. Firstly we consider the inversion of fractional integrals I+
which differs from I± by the presence of the decreasing exponential factor. In contrast with I± this integral is defined on functions cp(t) E Lp (R1 ) for all 1 5 5 oo . Besides G±(Lp ) C Lp by Young's Theorem 1.4, while I±(Lp ) � Lp . It is important to note that
p
the proof of which will be given in § 18.4.
6.2. Inversion of fractional integrals of LP -functions
I±
Liouville differentiation, 1>± , inverts fractional integrals
:c
The next lemma gives a useful representation of the truncated Marchaud fractional derivatives.
124
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
For a function f(z) = Ir.
Lemma 6.1.
(D +,e f)(z) = J �(t)
(6.6)
0
where the kernel
(6.7)
has the properties: 00
j �(t)dt =
1 and
�(t) � 0,
(6.8)
0
Proof. For t > 0 we have
so
f(z) - f(z - t)
= t cr
00
j k(e)
(6.9)
0
where
k (e) =
{ ecr- 1 1 ' _ c - l cr- 1 r(a) 1
ecr-
e
)
0 < e < 1, , e > 1.
(6. 10)
We note that k (e) E L 1 (R�) and that
(6.1 1)
§ 6. REPRESENTATION BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF Lp-FUNCTIONS
In view of (6.9) we obtain the relations
125
oo oo
dt k ( e ) cp(x - e) (D +,e f)(x) = r (1 a- a) j t2 cJe j t £ Q
0
00 F./ £ a cp(x e = r(1 - a) j e cJe j k(s)ds 0 0
00
t
= r (1 a- a) j cp( x t- ct) dt j k(s)ds. 0 0 Here t
j k(s)ds = a - 1 t r(1 - a)K(t)
(6.12)
0
which may be proved by direct evaluation of the left-hand side. Then ( 6.8) becomes evident. • We note that in a generalization of ( 6.6 ) the representation 00
(D t.,e f)(x) = j Kl, a (t)cp(x - ct)dt
(6.6' )
0
may be similarly obtained for arbitrary a > 0, where the truncated Marchand derivative ( 5.80' ) is used in the left-hand side and I
E (-1)l: (!) (t - k)t.
Kl , a (t ) = 1::0x(a, l) r (1 + a)t
(6.7' )
It is not difficult to show that
K1, a (t) E L 1 (R1 ) Theorem 6.1.
J Kl, a (t)dt = 1. 00
and
(6.8' )
0
Let f(x) = l±cp,
cp(x) = (D±f)(x),
(6.13 )
126
CHAPTER
2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
where D±f is to be understood as (D±f)(z) = £lim - 0 (D± ,,:f) (z) ,
(6. 14)
(L p )
The limit in (6.14) also exists almost everywhere.
Lemma 6.1 has paved the way for the proof of this theorem. Indeed, by (6.6) and (6.8) we have 00
j
(D+ ,£ /)(z) - �(z) = K(t)[
in view of Lebesgue dominated convergence Theorem 1 .2 and property ( 1 .34) . In agreement with the definition (6.14), (6. 13) is proved. The existence almost everywhere of the limit lim D+ ' £ / , f E Ia (Lp ), follows from Theorem 1 .3. £-0 Note that Lemma 6.1 and Theorem 6.1 yield the inequality
Indeed, in view of (6.8) and (6. 13) we have from (6.6):
The inequality (6.15) implies the equality (6. 16) for. f E If.(Lp )· In fact, the inequality obtained from (6.16) after replacing = by � ' is obvious. The inverse inequality follows from (6.15) in correspondence with (6. 14). It follows from Theorem 6.1 that If:
§ 6. REPRESENTATION BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF Lp -FUNCTIONS
Thus we may introduce the norm in
P)l ( Lp )
127
by the relation (6.17)
The space Ia (Lp ) with norm (6. 17) is a Banach space as an isometric to Lp .
6.3. Characterization of the space Ia (LP ) The next theorem gives the characterization of the space [a ( Lp ) in terms of truncated Marchaud fractional derivatives ( cf. the characterization of this space in Theorem 20.5 and 20.4 in terms of Lp -behaviour of finite differences of fractional order) . Theorem 6.2.
The necessary and sufficient conditions for /(z)
are 1 ) one of two following conditions is valid:
1 < p < 1/o:,
lim a c- o D+ 'e f E Lp ,
E
Ia (Lp),
(6.18)
(L p )
sup IID +, c /llp < oo,
·
c>O
(6.19)
/(z) E Lr (R 1 ) , where r = q = p/(1 - o:p) in the necessity part and r arbitrary ( 1 :5 r < oo) in the sufficiency part. !}
is
Proof. The necessity in this theorem is a simple fact, being a corollary of Hardy-Littlewood's Theorem 5 .3, of Theorem 6.1 and of (6. 15). The sufficiency part is more complicated. Let f E Lr and suppose that one of the conditions (6.18), (6.19) is valid. We are to show that there exists a function cp E Lp such that
I = P+ cp (then
(6.20)
f E Ia (Lp )). Instead of (6.20) we shall prove the result /(z) - f(z - h) = (I,tcp)(z) - (I,tcp)(z - h)
(6.21)
128
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
for any h > 0. Let us denote
(A h
00
j ah (z - t)
- oo
(6.22)
So the desired result (6.21) is /(z) - /(z - h) = (A h
Hence in virtue of the representation ( 6.6) 00
j
AhD+ ,e f = K(t)[f(z - ct) - f(x - h - ct)]dt. 0
(6.23)
Since C(f is dense in Lr , (6.23) holds for all f E Lr in view of the boundedness of operators on the left and right sides. The required result (6.21) will be obtained from (6.23) by letting g --+ 0. In view of (6.8) the right-hand side in (6.23) converges to /(z) - /(z - h) in Lr-norm. Consequently, there exists the limit of the left-hand side and so (6.24) Let (6.18) be valid. Since the operator A h is bounded in Lp , the limit
exists, where
129
§ 6. REPRESENTATION BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF Lp-FUNCTIONS
both strongly and weakly continuous, we again obtain (6.21) from (6.24) by similar arguments. Equation (6.21) is thus proved. It remains to observe that if differences of functions coincide identically, then the functions itself may differ only by a eonstant. Therefore (6.21) yields (6.20), in view of the fact that I, I+ cp belong to Lr, L9 respectively. • Corollary 1.
The norm (6.17) in the space JOt(Lp) is equivalent to the norms
(6.25)
II I II , + sup e >O I I D + ,elllp, q = P/(1 - o:p). Corollary 2.
(6.26)
The relation for fractional integration by parts 00
00
j l(x)(D+ g)(x)dx j g(x)(D�I)(x)dx
- oo
=
- oo
(6.27)
(with Marchaud fractional derivatives; cf. (5. 1 7}) is valid under assumptions that D� l e Lp, Di.g e Lr, I e L, , g E L, , where p > 1, r > 1, ; + � = 1 + o: and ! - ! _ OA ,., ! - ! _ OA ,., o I t •
r
fndeed, these assumptions being satisfied, then I E JOt(Lp), g E JOt(Lr) and
therefore (6.27) follows from (5.16). In order to formulate another corollary let us introduce the space of functions in Lr(R1 ) , which have fractional (Marchand) derivative in Lp(R1 ) : (6.28)
Corollary 3.
Let 0 < o: < 1,
1 < p < 1/o:, 1 � r < oo.
Then (6.29)
Remark 6.1.
In view of (5.49) the following weighted variant of Theorem
6.2 is valid: a function /( z ) is representable by a fractional integral I+cp with
130
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
cp E L,(R1 ; l z l �'), ap - 1 <
JJ
< p - 1, p > 1 , if and only if
1 1 < -1 <--a r p' p
1+v
--
r
1 +p = -- - a p
and
We add to the characterization of the space Icx(L,) the following idea concerning the behaviour of functions f(z) E Icx(L,) at infinity: fractional integrals f(z) = (J� cp)(z) of nonnegative (or nonpositive) functions cp(z) have a "bad" behaviour as z -+ ±oo respectively. Namely, they vanish at most as c l z l cx - l however rapid the vanishing of the function cp(z) was - see the estimate ( 7 . 15 ) below. So if a function /(z) is real valued and /(z) E Lrn l cx(L,), 1 ::; r ::; 1/( 1 - a) , then (D%/)(z) necessarily changes sign on the axis. For the case r = 1 more exact information may be given as follows: 00 If /(z) E L t n JOt (L,), 1 ::; p < 1/a, then I (D± ,E f)(z)dz = 0 for any c > 0 . - oo
00
(D±f)(z)dz = 0 too. Indeed, the above relation for D± ,E f may be obtained by direct integration of (5.59). As for D±f in the case p = 1 , it is sufficient to integrate (6.6) over the axis.
If p = 1, then
I
- oo
In the conclusion of this section we consider the characterization of the spaces They may be characterized similarly to the case of the finite integral (see Theorem 2.1) in terms of the absolute continuity of the functions
I±(L 1 ), 0 < a < 1 .
ft_ , (z) = r ( l
� I f(z 00
a)
0
�
t)C " dt.
Definition 6. 1. We say that f(x) E AC(R1 ) if f(x) is absolutely continuous on any finite interval and has a bounded variation on the closed real line R1 (completed by two infinite points). The statement that the function f(z) belongs to the class AC(R1 ) is equivalent to its representability in the form f(z) = I cp(t)dt + c, where cp(t) E L t (R 1 ). - oo One might define the class AC(R 1 ) with the aid of mapping onto the finite interval. Namely, let z = z(y) be a continuously differentiable one ,
:r:
to-one mapping of the interval [0, I] onto the closed axis [-oo, oo] and let f(y) = f[z(y)]. It may be shown that the definition of AC(R1 ) by the relation AC(R1 ) = { f(z) : /(y) E AC[O, 1] } is equivalent to the definition given above.
§ 6. REPRESENTATION BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF Lp -FUNCTIONS
131
Theorem 6.3. In order that /( z) E J±(L 1 ), it is necessary and sufficient that E AC(R1 ) and Jf_01(=Foo) 0 under the corresponding choice of signs .
If_ 01 (z) The
2.1).
=
proof of the theorem
is similar to the case of finite interval (see Theorem
6.4. Sufficiency conditions for the representability of functions by fractional integrals Noting that
a w (/, t) d II D a+ ,t / IIP � r (1 - a) f pt 1 +a t,
(6 . 30)
t) = Osup 11 /( z + r) - /( z) l lp ,
(6 . 31)
00
t
where wp (/,
we see that Theorem 6.2 immediately yields the following theorem.
If f E L 9 ( R1 ) , f E 101(Lp), 1 < p < 1/a.
Theorem 6.4.
00
q
= p/(1 - ap) and J t 1 - 01 -
0
wp
(/, t) dt < oo, then
Let us give simple sufficiency conditions for a Holderian function / ( z ) to belong to the space ( Lp). First we prove the following auxiliary estimates which will be repeatedly used in the book.
]01
For the integral
with a < 1 and a + b + c > 1, the estimate Aa, b , e (z) �
{
++ lzl)-1 min(a+b,c,a+b+e- 1 ) ' K (1 (1 lzl) -a- b- e ln(2 + lzl),
is valid where K does not depend on z .
if max ( c, if max( c,
a + b) =F 1, a + b) = 1,
(6 . 32)
Proof. Since the function Aa , b , e ( z ) is bounded, it is sufficient to estimate it for lzl -+ oo. We represent it in the form
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
132
Hence for lzl --+ oo we have
A a , 6, e (z) $
K j z j 1 -a- 6- e + lzl 1 -a- 6 - e
-
+
1 /2
1 /2
=
3/
1 /2
- 1 /2 1 /2
It is evident that
J1
( f f) .
J1/2 $ K J1/2 lrl -a (lrl + 1/lzl) - 6 dr -
= 2 Kizl a+6- 1
l z l /2
f T-a ( r + 1) - 6 dr 0
So for lzl --+ oo we have J1 $ �e:(lzl a +b - 1 + 1), if a + ¥ 1 , and J1 if a + = 1 . Similarly,
b
b
Gathering estimates we obtain (6.32). Theorem 6.5. If f ( z) E H >. CR 1 ),
$ K ln(2 + lzl),
•
A > a, then
l( D + ,e f)(z) l $ c( 1 + j z 1 ) - >. - o ,
a < A < 1,
I ( D + ,e f)(z ) l $ c(1 + jz 1 ) - >. - o ln( 2 + lzl), A = 1, where c does not depend on z and e. If herein A > max( a, - a + 1/p) then f(z) E l0(Lp)·
(6.33) (6.34)
and /(oo) = 0,
Proof. In view of the Holderian condition ( 1.6) on R1 we obtain the inequality I ( D + f )( z )l :5 .•
1 (1 + izi) �
f tl+a- � (1� iz - ti)� ' 00
0
Applying here (6.32), we obtain (6.33) and (6.34) . If /(oo)
=
0 and A >
-o
+ 1/p,
§ 6. REPRESENTATION BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF Lp -FUNCTIONS
133
then I E £ 9 , 1/q = -a + 1/p. Furthermore it follows from (6.33) , (6.34) that sup IID+,e iiiP < oo. Then I E I ( Lp ) by Theorem 6.2. • . t >O The next theorem gives sufficiency conditions in the weighted terms.
01
Theorem 6.6.
If l(:x) = lxl,. fi:1xD" , where g(:x) E H>.. C R1 ) , then (6.35)
where A > a, - a < JJ � 1, v > a and c doesn't depend on :x and c. In the case = 1 one more factor ln(2 + l:xl) is needed in (6.35). If besides
v + JJ
1 q
1
-1 = -1 - a,
-,
- - v < JJ <
q
q
(6.36)
p
Proof. Denoting p(:x) = lzl"(1 + l:xl)" , we have 00
1 f g(:x - tl+) - g(:x) dt (n+or ,e I)( :x ) = r( - a)p(:x) t or e
00
1
+r( a)
f[ e
1
p(:x - t )
-
g(:x - t) dt ] p(:x) t l+ or
1
=Ac (:x) + Be (:x) . The estimate for Ae (:x) follows from (6.32): (6.37) (with appearance of the factor ln(2 + l:xl) in the case A = we represent it as
1 1 Bc (:x ) _ - r ( - a ) (1 + l:xl)"
+ -a) 1
r(
00
f t
00
f[ t
[ (1 +
1
l:x - tl "
-
1
lzl "
1).
For estimating Bc (:x )
] g(:xt l+-ort) dt
]
g( :x - t ) dt 1 l :x - tl)" (1 + lzl ) " t1 + 01 jz - tjl'
1
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
134
The estimate for B: ( z) is obtained without difficulties 00
I B: ( z) l
�
c(1 + j z l ) - "
j t- 1 -a[lz l - " - lz - 1 1 - "]dt 0
00
� c jzj - 1' - a { l + jz l) - "
j 1t l- 1 -a l1 - j1 - t l-" ldt
- oo Further,
I Be2 ( z )l
C
1 -a dt oo � lz l a+l' f0 l (I +Ilzl)11 - (I + lxi i i -I tsign x l )" I I I t--tsign z l�' 00
�
cjz l " -a - " (1 + l x l ) - 11
=
clz l" -a- 1' (1 + l z l) "
=
j tll - o- 1 1 1 - t l - " (1
+ l z l l 1 - t l) -11 dt
0
j
l t - 1 1> 1 /2
. . . + cl z l" -a - 1' (1 + l x l)"
Ue (x) + � (z ) .
J
l t - 1 1< 1 /2
In the first of these integral we have It - I I > (t + 1)/5, so
Further,
1
Ve (x)
� clxi ii -1' - 0 (l + lx l ) - ll J e-" (I + e lx l) - llde 0
=
cl x lll - 1' - o (l + l x l ) - 11
j
lxl
t - "(I + t) -11 dt
(6.38)
0
� cl x l -"- a (l + l xl)min(11, 1 -11 )
(with the additional factor ln ( 2 + jxl) in the case v + J.l = I). Gathering inequalities,
§ 6. REPRESENTATION BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF Lp -FUNCTIONS
135
we see that Be (z) is estimated as in (6.38). Then the truncated derivative D+ ,e f has the same estimate, in view of (6.37). Thereby (6.35) is proved. This being obtained, the remaining statement of the theorem follows from Theorem 6.2. • The next theorem, similar to Theorem 6.6, may be proved correspondingly. Theorem 6.61 • 1(�)-/(0) E 1�1"
Ia (Lp )
•
If f(z)
E H).(R 1 ) , .\ > a, -a +
1/p
<
I'
<
1 /p, then
Now we shall prove the following theorem.
The space Icr ( Lp ) is invariant relative to the operator of multiplication by a function a( z) E H). ( R1 ), .\ > a , so
Theorem 6.7.
where the constant K does not depend on a and f. Proof. We verify the conditions of Theorem 6.2. The requirement af E L9 is obvious and lla / 11 9 � llaiiH A 11 / 11 9 • Further,
where
a Ae f = f( 1 _ a)
a
II A. / IIp � f ( l - a) ll a ll n•
I
00
00
f a(x) -l +a(xcr - t) /(z - t)dt. t
£
dt t l +a � -
{
_£
00
lf(x - t) lPdx (1 + lx i )�P( l + l x - t i )�P
}
or, after application of the Holder inequality with the exponents qfp and
1/p
(qfp)'
In view of (6.32) the repeated integral here converges, so we have finally IID+,e (a/)llp � cll a iiH A 11/ll ra (£ , ) , which completes the proof. •
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
136
Remark 6.2. Equation ( 1 1 .36}, being proved in § 1 1 below, states that multiplication by the step function O(x) = (1 + signz)/2 leaves the space l01(Lp) invariant, 1 < p < 1/o:. Basing on this fact we shall give in subsection 1 1 .4 another condition sufficient for the inclusion f(x) E l01(Lp ), which admits discontinuous functions (see Corollary 2 of Theorem 1 1.6) .
6.5. On the integral modulus of continuity of l01(Lp )-functions We conclude this section by certain simple properties of the continuity modulus (6.31). Although in general f(x) E Lp (R1 ) for /(z) E l01(Lp ), we have however f(x) - f(x - h) E Lp(R1 ) for any h. This follows from (6.9) . Moreover, the following statements are valid for /(z) E l 01 (Lp), 1 < p < 1/o::
ctO/II D + fllp , 2) wp (/, t) = o(t 01 ) when t 1) Wp (/, t) �
(6.39) �
0.
(6.40)
Indeed (6.39) follows from (6.9) by application of the generalized Minkowsky inequality ( 1 .30) . In order to obtain (6.39) we rewrite (6.9) as follows
j
00
f(x) - f(x - t) = t 01 K (e)[cp(x - te) - cp(x)] de , cp = D+ J, 0
Hence, applying the generalized Minkowsky
by taking (6. 1 1) into account. inequality again, we obtain
f
00
Wp(/, t) � t 01 IK (e)lwp(
(6.41)
0
It is easy to derive the estimate
w,(f, t) :5 c, t aw,(rp, t ) + c2t from (6.41), c1 and the estimate
f
A
0
c2 not depending on t.
Wp (/, t) dt < t 1 + 01 -
A
f "'e���f.) 00
t
d{.
(6.42)
By simple steps one may also obtain
f Wp(tcp, t) dt + r(13A+ao:) f Wpt 1(
0
oo
A
01
(6.43)
§ 7.
§'
7.
and
INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
137
Integral Transforms of Fractional Integrals Derivatives
to
We exhibit here the results of applying Fourier, Laplace and Mellin transforms
fractional integrals and derivatives. Preliminaries concerning these transforms, have been given in § 1 .4.
7. 1 . The Fourier transform The main assertion of this section is the following equation for the Fourier transform of the fractional integral
:F(I± cp) = �(x) / (=t= ix) < \
(7.1)
0 < Rea < 1 .
The function ( =F ix ) a is to b e understood in analogy with (5.26)
as
(7.2) If a is real, we also write (7.3 ) In the case of fractional differentiation we shall have the similar equation
:F(Vf: cp) = (=t= ix t <,O(x) ,
Re a � 0 .
( 7.4 )
Equations ( 7.1 ) and (7.4) evidently link to ( 1. 105), generalizing the latter to the case of non-integer order. We provide the auxiliary equation 00
J t a - l e - zt dt = f (a)fza , 0
z :/= 0,
( 7.5 )
before proving ( 7.1 ) . Here Rea > 0 when Rez > 0, 0 < Re a < 1 when Re z = 0 and the principal value of the function za , analytic in the right half-plane, is chosen so that z a is positive for z = x > 0 in the case of real a. Let us prove this equation. We know it is valid for z = x > 0 by virtue of ( 1.54) . Thus it is true when Re z > 0, because the left-hand and right-hand sides are analytic in the
138
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
half-plane Re z >
0.
It remains to consider the boundary case Re z =
1 ta- l e -ixt dt 00
0
0, z =/; 0, i.e.
= r(a)(ix) -a , 0 < Re a < 1, X =I 0,
(7.6)
the condition Re a < 1 providing convergence of the left-hand side integral at infinity. To prove (7.6) we carry out the substitution it x = z:
1 ta- l e- ixt dt 00
where x<
have
0.
0
£,
= (ix) -a
1 a- l e -z d z
£
(7.7)
z,
is the imaginary half-axis (0, ioo) for x > 0 and the half-axis ( -ioo, 0) for Since j e -z I exponentially vanishes in the right half-plane as lzl --+ oo, we
J za- l e- Z dz = f0 x a- l e-x dx = r(a) by the Cauchy integral theorem. 00
£
Hence
(7.6) follows.
The justification of (7.1) is given by the following theorem.
Equation (7.1) is valid for 0 < Re a < 1 and lf' (x) E L 1 (R1 ), the Fourier transform :F in (7.1) being understood as in (1.103).
Theorem 7.1.
Proof. By
(1.103) we have :F( lex + )
'P
1 1 !!.._ _ _ =
00
.
e• xt - 1 dt it
1t If'(s)ds -oo (t - sp-a
-oo oo 1oo eixt - 1 d 1 1 = r(a) dx r.p(s) ds it (t - sp -a dt . -oo r(a) dx
IJ
The interchange of order of integration is made possible here by Fubini's Theorem 1.1. Further, after differentiating we obtain
1 s ds 1 e•xt dt :F(If. r.p) = lf' ( ) (t - s ) l -a -oo 1 eixt dt 1 1 = r(a)1 . r.p(s)eixll ds erlixr-adr = <,O(x) tl -a . r(a) -oo 1
d f (a) dx
00
00
IJ
00
00
0
Hence we arrive at
.
(7.1) in view of (7.6). •
00
0
139
§ 7. INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Remark 7.1. Equation (7.1 ) is not extended to values Re a ;;::: 1 in its direct form, since the left-hand side in (7.1) may not exist even for very smooth functions,
e.g.
X
J
- oo
(I+
� j (x - t) a- 1
(I.t
a
b) a
(
(7.8) )a
( x_ ... -----"f-:-_-_.;..._x-:----a-'-_ l > min ln (t ) ...;. - a9�b T (a + 1 )
so that (I.+t.p)(x) "' cx a- l as X --+ +oo and the Fourier transform FI+
(<1 ±�x)"]
[(l�rJ)" ]
(7.9) - oo
In view of the inversion formula ( 1.104) for Fourier transforms this means (7.10)
[ (t�i�)"]
(:�:;or e=fx .
Applying the inverse Fourier which implies .1"I+ = 211' transform to the latter equation, we arrive at the result (5.24) by taking ( 7.9 ) into account with Jl replaced by Jl - a and x by - x. The above arguments are true for Re (Jl - a) > 1 , but (5.24) itself is valid for Re (Jl - a) > 0 due to the analyticity with respect to Jl·
140
CHAPTER
2.
FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
In conclusion we give here formulae for the evaluation of the cosine- and sine-Fourier transforms of the fractional integrals I0+
(7.11) (7.12) In the case of I�
7 2 The Laplace transform .
.
It follows from (1.122) that the fractional order integral (I0 rp)(x), Re a > 0, is the Laplace convolution of the form
(7.13) Therefore, using the convolution theorem {1.123) for the Laplace transform of the fractional integral /0+
(7 .14) which is also true for sufficiently good functions cp if Rea < 0. We do not consider here the operator I� since the composition LI�
Let r.p(x) E L 1 (a, b) for any b > a and let the estimate j r.p(x) l ::;
AeP ox
if x > b,
A,p0 - const ,
Po � 0,
(7.15)
holds and Re a > 0 . Then, for x > b + 1, the inequalities I {I�\ IP)(x) l � BeP o x , - ) I (I:+
if if
Po > 0 , Po = O, B - const .
(7.16)
§ 7.
141
INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
are valid. Proof. Let x > b + 1. For simplicity we assume a to be real. Then we have
max( O, a-1) + AePoX - c1 x f <
<
-
This
__
(a)
x -b
e -P o T dT I0 -r 1-a
C1 Xmax(O,a-1) + C2 ePoX '
completes the proof.
•
Let Rea > 0. Then (7.14) with Rep > p0 holds for functions 1p(x), satisfying the conditions of Lemma 7.1 with a = 0.
Theorem 7.2.
Po
Proof. The applicability of the Laplace transform in the case Rep > follows from Lemma 7.1 and the fact that if 1p E L t (O, b), then Ig+ IP E L 1 (0, b) (see §§ 2 and 3). Equation (7.14) itself is verified by direct calculation, changing the order of integration by the Fubini theorem and using (7.5). •
Let -n < Re a $ 1 - n, n = 1, 2, . . . . If 1p(x) E AC"( [O, b]), j
Theorem 7.3.
=
(Ig+ !p)(x) = (d/dx)"(IgJ"!p)(x), Rea + n > 0, according to (2.32), we, first, apply ( 1.124) taking into consideration that (d/dx)i (IgJ" �P)(x) = 0 with z = 0 and j = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n - 1 follow from the conditions IP(j ) (O) = 0, j = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n - 1. Then we use Theorem 7.2 with respect to the integral IgJ "
Remark 7.2. Equation ( 7. 1 4) and the inversion of the Laplace transform
(1.120) yield the following representation for the operator Ig+ via the Laplace operators L and L - 1 , namely (7.17) (Ig+ IP)(x) = L - 1 z -a L1p(x). Another result analogous to (7.17) is also valid. This is
(7. 1 8 )
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
142
which after substituting rp � L .,P follows from
(I�Lt/;)(x) Lx -a .,P (x ).
(7.19)
�
This is checked by direct evaluation for sufficiently good functions
0 < Re a < 1.
.,P (x),
if
7.3. The Mellin transform Equations (1.105), (7.1), (7.4) and (7.14) show us that integro-differentiation of an arbitrary order a is reduced in Fourier and Laplace transforms to multiplication by the power functions (=Fix) -a and p -a respectively. The results of (1.117) show that when we apply the Mellin transform to a derivative of integer order n , its transform is multiplied by the product (1 - s) n = f(1 + n - s)/f(1 - s). The latter circumstance with respect to fractional integrals and derivatives lead us to the relations
(l!M (z))* (s) = r (�(� : � ) /*(s + o), Re(s + o) < 1, )
(7.20)
•
(I� f(z))* (s) = r (��) /*(s + o), Res > 0, o
(7.21)
a X - a tp( X )) * ( S ) = r (l - a -) s) tp* (S) ' Re(a + s) < 1, (LO+ f( 1 - S
(7.22)
which after the substitution f(x) = x - a rp(x), according to (1.117) take the form
Res < 1.
(7.23)
The conditions for when these formulae are valid are contained in the following theorems.
Let Rea > 0 and f(t)t8 + a- 1 E L 1 (0, oo) . Then (7 .20) holds if Res < 1 - Rea while (7.21) holds if Res > 0.
Theorem 7.4. The
proof is carried out in the same way
conditions on
a and s
the proof of Theorem ensure the existence of the inner integrals. as
7 .2.
Given
Let -n < Rea � 1 - n, n = 1, 2, . . . , f(t) E cn ([O, b]), b being any positive number, and let f(t)t a+& - 1 E L 1 (0, oo ) . Then (7.20) holds if
Theorem 7.5.
§ 7. INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
1 43
Res < 1 - Re a and conditions X3 - k (Ig: k f)(x) = 0 for x = 0, x = oo,
k = 1 , 2, . . . , n,
(7.24)
are satisfied, while (7.21) holds if Res > 0 and the conditions x3 - k (J� + k f)(x) = 0 for x = 0, x = oo,
k = 1 , 2, . . . , n,
(7 .25)
are satisfied. Proof. By the condition f(t) E cn ([O, b]) the fractional derivative (Ig+ J)(x) exists. We write it down in the form (Ig+ J)(x) = d�".. (Ig:n f)(x) ( see (2.32)). Then we apply the Mellin transform to it and integrate by parts n times, thus
I
(I�+ f(z))*(s) = .,• - l d d�:�l u�r f}(z) 00
0
n-1 k =O
"" & k 1 O++ A: + 1 / (x) l xoo= O - L.J ( 1 - s) k x - - rr + ( 1 - s) n
I X3- n- 1 Ig:n f(x)dx. 00
0
By (7.24) the integrated terms are equal to zero. Applying Theorem 7.4 and having replaced a by a + n and s by s - n, respectively, we obtain the result
Hence, .we deduce ( 7.20) . The case of the integral I� is considered in a similar way. The theorem is thus proved. • Together with (7 .22) and (7 .23) the following theorem, characterizing the result of the application of fractional integrals and derivatives to the inverse Mellin transform, is used below as well. Theorem 7.6.
Let J• (s) E £2 ( 1/2 - ioo, 1/2 + ioo), 7J � min (O, Re (a - b)). Then
144
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
the equations X bla b X a -
O+
-
1 / 2 +ioo
J 1 / 2 -ioo
S j* ( S ) X - ds = 'I
6
1 / 2+ioo
f ( 1 - a - s) j*( ) X - ds, s) S
S f(l - b J 1 / 2 -ioo 'I
_
6
Rea < 1/2, Reb < 1/2;
:h�- • ., - •
j / 2 -ioo
1 / 2+ ioo
1
•"
(7.26)
��!: � f*(s)z - 'ds, j / 2 -ioo 1 / 2+ ioo
f*(s)z - ' ds =
•"
1
Rea > - 1/2, Reb > - 1/2.
(7.27)
hold. The proof follows from the existence of the integrals in (7 .26) and (7 .27) under
the formulated conditions on the parameters and function, from their absolute convergence almost everywhere and, as a result of this, from the possibility of interchanging the order of integration in the left-hand sides of (7.26) and (7.27) . After doing this the evaluation of the inner integral is carried out by { 1 .68). We also note that §§ 10, 18 and 36 contain various composition formulae reflecting the result of the application of some other integral transforms to the operators I� and I� , and their generalizations and modifications (see also §§ 9, 23 and 39).
= J t a-l f(x =f t)dt, Re a > 0, 0 are the Mellin transforms of the functions
Remark 7. 3. The fractional integrals f{a)(I±f)(x)
00
the inverse Mellin transform ( 1 . 1 13) we obtain the following representations of the function f(x) via its fractional integrals, namely
f(x =F r) = 2�i
a1+ioo
f(a)(I±f)(x)r -a da, a 1 = Rea > 0, J a1-ioo
(7.28)
with T > 0 and under the respective choice of signs. The formula may evidently be interpreted as an integral analogue of the Taylor series expansion. Further, taking in particular x = 0, we have
f( =t=r) = 2�i
a1+ioo
f(a)(I±f)(O)r - 0da, r > 0. J a1-ioo
(7.29)
§ 8. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF GENERALIZED FUNCTIONS
145
This means that / (z) may be restored by the values of its fractional integrals only at one point if the latter are known for all o on some line Reo = o 1 > 0.
(11/)(0)
§ 8 . Fractional Integrals and Derivatives of Generalized Functions We assume that the reader has some minimal knowledge concerning generalized functions. A generalized function is treated as a continuous functional on one or another space of test functions. Various such spaces are used depending on the problem in hand, in order to take into account the particular characteristics of the J>roblem. This will become obvious in the context of the present section.
� . 1 . Preliminary ideas We shall consider generalized functions over n, where n is the real axis or half-axis. Only § 8.5 will contain brief indications in the case of n being a finite interval. We cho_ose test functions on n to be infinitely differentiable at the interior points of n with prescribed behaviour at the endpoints of n. The value of the generalized function f as a functional on the test function cp will be denoted by ( / , cp ) , The generalized function is called regular if there exists a locally integrable function f(x) such that J f(x)cp(x)dx exists for each test function cp(z) and n
j
(/, cp) = f(x)cp(x)dx n
(8.1)
It is assumed that the bilinear form (/, cp) is chosen in such a way that it coincides with (8.1) in the case of a regular generalized function. The space X = X (O) of test functions is assumed to be a topological vector space. We denote by X' = X'(O) the topological dual space of X, i.e. the space of continuous linear functionals on X . Let us recall the notion of a generalized function concentrated at a point. A generalized function f E X' is said to be zero on an open set G, if ( /, cp) = 0 for each test function which is zero beyond G. The union 01 of all open sets where f = 0 is called a null set of the function f. The complement of the null set with respect to n is said to be the support of the generalized function and is denoted by supp I = n \ 0I · We say that the generalized function is concentrated at the point zo , if supp / is this point z0 • The well-known Dirac function 6 ( z - zo ), Z o E n, and its derivatives defined by
146
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
provide examples of generalized functions, concentrated at a point. The inverse statement is also true namely, any functional f, concentrated N at the point z0 , is of the form f = l: ck f5( k ) (z - zo) , - Vladimirov [2, p.52] or
k=O
Gel'fand and Shilov [1, p.149]. There are two main ways to define fractional integrals and derivatives of generalized functions. The first goes back to Schwartz [1] and is based on the definition of a fractional integral as a convolution (8.2) of the function rla ) z±-1 with generalized function f - see § 8.3. This way is well suited to the case of the half-line. The second way, which is more common, is based on using the adjoint operator. Namely, starting with (2.20) and (5.16) for fractional integration by parts one may introduce (8.3) by definition, 16_ , J� and fractional derivatives being defined similarly. The approach via (8.3) will be correct if 16_ continuously maps the space of test functions X into itself. Sometimes a more general treatment is admitted when f and 1:+ f are considered as generalized functions on different spaces of test functions X and Y so that f E X', 1:+ 1 E Y' and then If_ must map continuously Y into X. We shall outline (8.2) very briefly in § 8.3. The main attention is paid to (8.3). This is considered in § 8.2 in the case of the axis R1 while § 8.4 deals with the case of the half-axis. 8.2.
The case of the axis R1 • Lizorkin's space of test functions
The well-known space S of Schwartz test functions (which are infinitely differentiable and rapidly vanish at infinity together with all derivatives) as well as the class COO C S of finite infinitely differentiable functions is poorly adapted for fractional integrals and derivatives. It is obvious that functions I�
§ 8. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF GENERALIZED FUNCTIONS
lx l) - ml
147
6+
< oo. The space exists m such that sup(1 + and the similar space €) _ with the "bad" behaviour of functions for X --+ - 00 are invariant relative to fractional integration I+ and I� respectively. Indeed, for E and any p we have
1 ( 1 + lx l)m ddxkk +
as
<
-
l x l) m l
(1 +
00
0
x --+ -oo. Taking p to be sufficiently large (p > a + 1 ) we obtain
1 (1 + l z i)m d�� I.tcpl :5 c( 1 + lzl)m+a+l-p J ta- 1 ( 1 + t) -a- 1 dt 00
(8.4)
0
:::; const
with p > m + a + 1 now. It is easily shown that I+. preserves a slow growth as z --+ +oo. The topology in is easily defined by means of a countable set of norms which embrace the "power" vanishing at one infinity and the "power" growth at another. The spaces are, in a sense, adjacent to the spaces (see (5.52)) of summable functions, which are also invariant with respect to fractional integration. The inconvenience of the spaces is in the fact that we have to consider fractional integration I+ and I� on different spaces of test functions and 6_ . A more significant shortcoming is that generalized functions on are to vanish as -+ ±oo, so, for example, power functions do not belong to Following Lizorkin, let us introduce the subspace � C S, invariant with respect to fractional integration and differentiation. The idea of introducing such a space will be clear in Fourier transforms. Indeed, by ( 7.1) the action of fractional integration is reduced to dividing the Fourier transform by
6:::1:
6:::1:
6:::1:
Lp,w
6:::1: 6± .
x
6+
(=fix)a :
( 8 .5 ) x) a . (=Fix) x= w = {..P ..p E s, ..p
The required invariance will be achieved if the function �( does not become E S, worse after division by So we introduce the space W of functions which equal zero at the point 0 together with all their derivatives: :
,P(x)
148
CHAPTER
2.
FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
The space of Fourier transforms offunctions in \li is said to be a Lizorkin space and is defined as
Definition 8. 1 .
� = {
0 =
the space of Schwartzian test functions polynomials:
cp(z)
E S, which are orthogonal to all
J tk
Let first 7. 1.) Then
Proof.
1 $ Rea < 2.
(The case
(8.6) Let us
0 < Re a < 1 is contained in Theorem
-oo - oo N N -6 i X6 S 1 r = (a) N-oo lim J
If Rea :/; 1 integration by parts yields the formula
(8.7)
0
The first term here tends to zero by (8.6) ( apply L'Hopital's rule ) , while in the second term it is possible to pass to the limit directly due to the assumption Rea < Taking into account the value of integral (7.6) we obtain ,((a- l)r(a a - 1) (z ) , whIC. h was reqmred . .r 1a -ix r( )
+
) a
2.
·
§ 8. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF GENERALIZED FUNCTIONS
149
The case a = 1 is simple:
in view of (8.6). We consider now the singular case Re a = 1 , a f= 1 , a = 1 + i(J, (J 'I 0. It is easily seen that
N
J
N- 1
cp( s ) e*z• ds
N- •
J £}8 eiz( de
-+
so
that
0 as N -+ oo
0
for cp(z) E �. Therefore from (8.7)
Integrating by parts and carrying out simple transformations, we have
- oo
where x(e) =
{
-oo
. e < 1 . The first term here obviously tends to cp(z), the second o, e > 1
1,
A
term tends to zero due to the property (8.6), while in the third term the passage to the limit is possible under the integral sign. So (8.8) where the notation
1 50
CHAPTER
2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
By passing to the limit it is not difficult to derive that A( z) = f (iO)( - iz)- i8 - (i0)- 1 from (7.6) which turns (8.8) into the equality FP+ cp = (-iz) - 1 - i 8cp(z). Finally, let Rea > 2. This may he reduced subsequently to already considered cases due to the semigroup property P+ cp = I�I+- 1cp, cp E � Similarly the case Re a = 0 follows from the case Rea = 1 due to the semigroup property I!tcp = !J�+i B
is used.
Lemma 8.2. Operators 1r , (} E operator in Lp (R1 ) , 1 < p <
oo.
R1 , defined on �, are extendible to the bounded
Proof. By lemma 8. 1 . the action of the operator I!t is reduced transforms to multiplication by the bounded function
m
Fourier
( -iz) - iB = e < ""/ 2)8sign x [cos((} In lxl) i sin((} In lxl)] -
at least on the set �, which is dense in Lp( R1 ) - see § 9.2 (note 8.1). It is not difficult to show that this function satisfies conditions ( 1 .41'). Hence, by Theorem 1 .6, operator I!/ is bounded in Lp (R1 ) . • It is easily deduced from Lemma 8.2. that the operator I!� is bounded in Lp(a, b), 1 < p < From Definition 8.1 and Lemma 8.1 it follows immediately that space � is indeed invariant relative to fractional integration and differentiation of any order. Space � may be considered as a topological vector space with the topology of the space S. We recall that the latter is generated by the countable family of seminorms sup(1 + z 2 ) m l 2 l cp( l: )(z) l. Space � is closed in S. In fact it is known
oo.
X
(Gel'fand and Shilov [1 , p.155]) that the topology, defined in S by the S-topology in the space F( S) = S of Fourier images, coincides with the initial convergence in S. So it is sufficient to show that \li is closed in S, which is evident. One may define a topology in \li which embraces the behaviour of functions .,P(z) not only at infinity, but for x - 0 as well, namely by means of a countable number of seminorms sup[( I + z 2 ) m 1 2 jx i -P I .,P( A: )(z)l]. This topology coincides with
that of S for functions .,P E \li . This may be checked by separating the cases lxl < 1 and lxl > 1 and applying the Taylor expansion with the remainder in integral form in the first case. X
Remark 8.1. Space � does not contain real-valued functions everywhere different from zero. This follows from (8.6) with k = 0. The space of linear continuous functionals on will be denoted by �' as is usual. Let us compare �' and S' . We begin by comparing lli' with S'. Since \li is closed in S, we may identify lli' with the quotient-space of the Schwartzian space
S'
§ 8. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF GENERALIZED FUNCTIONS
151
\II� of functionals in S' having \II as a null space, i.e. = S'I\II� (8.9) where \II � = {/ : f E S', (/,1/J) = 0,1/J E \11 } . We have used the known general modulo the subspace
q,'
fact: namely if M is a closed subspace in a linear topological space E, then M' = E' IMl. , where Ml. is the space of all functionals in E', which are orthogonal to M. It follows from the definition of space that consists of functions concentrated at the point x 0. Then - see § 8.1 consists of linear combinations of the delta-function and its derivatives. It is well known that cS (A:) (z) is the Fourier transform of the power function, that is .1"{(-it)l: ; x } 27rc5(A:) (z), the Fourier transform being understood in the sense of generalized functions:
\II ,
=
\II� - \II�
=
(},
(8.10)
(8.11)
similar to (8.9), we have the space
(8.12) �� = {/ : / E S' , (/,
f E <)' by the equality
Fractional differentiation corresponds to the case proper for all a. In effect, we have
Rea < 0.
Definition
(8.13) (8.13) is (8.14)
\II (/, I�
in accordance with (8.10). Since cj;(x) E here and multiplication by (±ix) -a is a continuous operation in we have that is a continuous functional on <).
\II ,
Remark 8.2. Equation (8.13) may serve as a definition of the fractional integral for a function f(x) E Lp (R1 ) with p � 1la when integrals do not exist in the
If:/
152
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
usual sense, being divergent at infinity. In this case I�/ is a generalized function. But this generalized function is such that its difference
f:t.h / = f(x + h) - /(x), defined in the proper way: (t:t. h f, cp) = (/, f:t. - h cp), is a normal function for all h E R1 and tJ.hf E Lp(R1 ), if a < 1. This assertion is easily derived using the representation (6.9). In the case a 2:: 1 a similar assertion may be obtained by bringing in differences of higher order - see the exact formulation in a similar situation for the multidimensional case in Lemma 26.4. Let us consider some examples. Take equations (5.24) and (5.25). The function f(x) = (1 ± ix ) - P may be considered as an element in ' for any I' since .1="[(1 ± ix ) - P ] E W' by (7.10), the Fourier transform being understood in accordance with (8.10). The situation j(x) = 0, corresponds to the case I' = -m, m = 0, 1, 2, . . . , which is in agreement with the fact that ' does not contain polynomials. Based on the usual rule (8.10) we have that the equations
(8.15) (8. 1 6) are valid for all complex I' except the case I' = a - m, m = 0, 1, 2, . . . For this case we have equations
(8.17) (- ) -1
1 I� [(x ± i) m - a] = m!f(am- p ) ( x ± i ) m ln ( x ± i ) , (8. 18) where ln ( 1 ± ix) = In v'1 + x 2 ± iarctgx, ln ( x ± i) = In v"f+"i2 ± iarcctgx . Let us prove for example (8.17). For f(x) = (1 + ix ) - P we obtain the relation
by
(8.13), (8.14) and (8.5). Taking (7.9) into account we have
§ 8 FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF GENERALIZED FUNCTIONS
153
Since
- oo
Since
00 J (z + i)mcp(z)dz = 0 by {8.6), we may apply L'Hopital's rule, which yields
- oo
{8.17).
Now we evaluate the fractional integral of the delta-function and of its derivatives. We have
So
I�6(k ) is the functional which acts in accordance with formula
or
in the case
Rea > k.
(I±a 6(k )
'
T) m
Equation
-
{-1) k r (a - k)
00
J t a-± k - l Ttl)(t)dt
{8.19)
- oo
(8.19) means that
(8.20) It is easily shown that (8.20) may be extended to the values Rea ::; k. The generalized function t±- k - l is to be treated then in the sense of regularization - see {5.68). The points a = k - m, m = 0, 1, 2, . . . , are herein singular, corresponding to the equality If.6( k ) = 6(m) . We conclude our consideration, of the space <) by the following remark. Besides its evident advantages - simplicity of definition, clarity of operations with Fourier-images - <) has an essential shortcoming: it is lacking in multipliers. Namely, if m ( z)cp( z) E <) for all cp( z) E <), then m( z) may be nothing else but a polynomial. In reality, in this case we have
00 f m(z)cp(x)dz = 0 for all cp(z) E <),
- oo
154
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
but it was shown above that the space defined by (8.12) and orthogonal to (), consists of polynomials only. 8.3. Schwartz's approach
We shall consider generalized functiQns on the test function space K1 = CCf(Rt ). Following Schwartz [1] we define a convolution of two generalized functions in terms of a direct product. Let /(z) and g(y) be generalized functions of variables z and2 y respectively. A functional f g, given on test functions
x
00
00
(f * g,
for regular functions, it is natural to introduce (8.21) (f * g,
x
so
-a, a .
a,
as
a,
a.
( a-1 ) (8.22) (Io+ f,
§ 8. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF GENERALIZED FUNCTIONS
155
- see (5.68), for example - except for the cases a = 0, -1, -2, . . . , when (8.22) is replaces by the rule of direct differentiation of a generalized function. We shall sum up the consideration of correctness of Schwartz's approach by the following theorem with K+ denoting the space of generalized functions I E K� supported on the half-axis R� . Theorem 8.1. If I E K+, then 18+ 1 E K+ also for any a E Besides C.
and for each I E K+ there exists a unique generalized function g E K+ such that I = 18+ g, Q E c . The
proof is obtained directly from the definition of 18+ 1 for I E K+.
8.4. The case o f the half-axis. The approach via the adjoint operator
The simplest way to define the test function spaces, which are invariant relative to fractional integration /� or 18+ is as follows. Let S( R�) be the restriction of the space S = S(R1 ) on the half-axis, that the functions l{z) E S(R�) are infinitely differentiable on [0, oo) and rapidly vanish together with all derivatives as z -... oo. It is easily shown that the operator /� preserves the space S(R�). Further, let e� = 6�(R�) be the space of infinitely differentiable functions
lim
:z:-o,oo
z1w (m ) (z) = 0,
I, m,
= 0, 1, 2, . . . } .
(8.23)
1 56
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
We define
J xA:w(x)dx 00
=
0,
k = 0, 1, 2, . . . } .
(8.24)
0
Thus functions of the space «+ have the property that their Mellin transform is equal to zeros at the integer points s 1, 2, 3, . . . . Let us introduce a topology in the spaces + and «+ by the norms sup sup ( l + z) A: Iw ( m )(z) l, k = 0, 1 , 2, . . . z> � O m A: It is easily shown that the spaces s+ and «+ are complete in this topology. The function 2 . ( 1r Inx) x(x) = exp ( In x ) sm (8.25) 2 gives an example of a function in «+ . This may be checked directly from the fact that the Mellin transform of this function is =
-4-
J
00
0
xz - 1 x(x)dx = 2
J e-t�f4sh zt sin �tdt 00
( )
0
(8.26)
- see the tables of Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev [1, 2.5.57.1]. We note that the space «+ is rich in elements. One may show that the Mellin convolution (see (1.114)) of functions and t/J belongs to «+ for any t/J E S+ and w E «f? + . Owing to the invariance of the space « = «f?(R1 ) relative to the operator I� we may easily prove the following lemma. w
Lemma 8.3.
itself
The operator I0+ , Rea > 0, maps the space « + isomorphically onto
Indeed,1 let eo «+ -+ « be the operator of continuation by zero from the half axis to R and let P+ be 1the restriction operator onto R� , so that I0+ P+ I+.e1o . Since e («�? ) C « «(R ), we obtain I0 ( + ) � «+ by the invariance of « (R ) relativeo to+the operator I+. . The inverse+ imbedding is obtained by a similar consideration of fractional differentiation vg+ . :
=
«1?
=
§ 8. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF GENERALIZED FUNCTIONS
•+
157
Based on Lemma 8.3 we may define the operator I� , Rea > 0, in the space du�l to <)+ by the equation (8.27)
Lemma 8.3 immediately yields the following. Corollary. The operator I�, Re a > 0, maps the space <)+ isomorphically onto itself. Equation (8.27) may serve as a definition of the fractional integral I�f for f E Lp(R�) in the case p � 1/a, though this integral diverges in general in this case if understood in usual sense - see also Remark 8.2. This occurrence is an �vantage of the test functions space <)+ · The spaces Fp, IJ discussed briefly below have no such advantage. To formulate the analogue of Lemma 8.3 for the operator I� we need to define initially the following spaces of test functions equipped with the topology of the space s+ . Lemma 8.4. The operator I�, Rea > 0, maps <)f. isomorphically onto <) + a . proof of this lemma is easily derived from Lemma 8.3 we observe that 2a l The
if
(I�
=
Powers of x, x� are elements of the space <)+ if ..\ =/= 0, 1, 2, . . . and of the space (<)f.)' if a - ..\ =/= 1, 2, . . . (for excluded values of ..\ powers x� are not distinguishable from zero as elements of the corresponding space). Remark 8.3.
8.5. McBride's spaces
We discuss now very briefly another approach to fractional integro-differentiation of generalized functions which was developed by McBride. Let Jpl be the space of functions infinitely differentiable on (0, oo) with a support in [0 , ij and such that (8.28) sup lx-p+k cp(k) (x) l < oo �> 0
CHAPTER
1 58
2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
for each k 0, 1, 2, . . . (cf. (8.23)), p being an arbitrary real number. Norms (8.28) generate a topology in :lp = u� 1 :lpl· First of all we observe that power functions z.\ belong to the dual space :1 if A > p - 1. Multiplication by z.\ is a continuous operation from :lp onto :19 if; A - p. More interesting will be the statement about the action of the operator I� in :lp· To formulate this we introduce one more space, namely the space :10 of finite infinitely differentiable functions which is defined (analogously to the space :lp ) by the (semi)norms: sup jz- k (1 + j ln zl) - l
= q
z> O
The operator I� maps Jp continuously into Jq with q :5 p + Rea, if p + Re a < 0, and with q = 0, if p + Rea > 0. In the case p + Rea = 0 the operator I� maps Jp continuously into the space :70 . Lemma 8.5.
The
proof is obtained by simple estimates and is thus omitted. Lemma 8.5 allows us to define the fractional integral I�+ / for generalized functions f E :1:, :5 0, by the equation q
(8.29)
where p = a if < 0, and p > -a if = 0. One may define Ig+ j for f E (:70 )' by (8.29) as well, taking
q
q
q
q
It is then said that
It is known that the operators Iffr and Ir:_ map Fp ,JJ continuously into Fp,JJ+a for all values of ReJ.t except a countable set of values ReJ.t. We do not consider these and other spaces here in detail, but make the following remark only - see references in § 9.
§ 8. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF GENERALIZED FUNCTIONS
Remark 8.4.
159
The equation
does not define the fractional integral /� / , where f E Lp (R�), for all p � 1/o: no matter what > -1, � 1 may be. Indeed, let
q
(X)
(I�f,
xP +a dx (1 + x) ( l +e )f q
(8.30)
1+p+a- 2fp = C f (1 x x ) ( l +e )f q+dx2fp' + 0 (X)
in view of the inequality )a - 1 dy � cxiJ+ a . Ig+
0
The integral in (8.30) diverges in the case e = 1, o: = 3 for all q
E [1, oo) .
JJ
>
-1
and
8.6. The case of an interval
The approach via the adjoint operator, i.e. the equation (8 . 31)
(see (2.20)) may be used now. In view of (8.3 1) we may consider the fractional integral 1:+ 1 of generalized functions /, if the latter are defined on the test functions
(8 . 32 )
is suitable for this aim. It is invariant relative to fractional differentiation Vf_ too.
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
160
A
similar space c: ([a, 6]) = {cp : cp(z) E C00 ([a, 6]), cp( k ) (a) = 0, k = 0, 1, 2, . . . }
is invariant relative to fractional integration ]�+ and fractional differentiation v�+ . By simple arguments the cfollowing statement may be proved: Abel's equation
I�+ cp = I with I E X', X = r([a, 6]), has a unique solution cp = v�+ l in the space X' of generalized functions, this solution being understood in the sense that (V�+ f, w ) = (f, Vf_w), w E X. § 9. Bibliographical Remarks and Additional Information to Chapter 2 9. 1 . Historical notes
Notes to § 5.1. Fractional integro-differentiation of the form I� cp (but differing indeed from I�cp by the factor ( - 1 )0 ) appeared in the paper by Liouville [1, p.8] (1832). Liouville arrived at this expression by formally transforming his original definition of fractional integration of functions, represented by series of exponential functions, or by an integral of such a function, we refer also to his papers [2] (1832), (5) (1834). The fractional integral If.cp in the form (5.4) may be found in Letnikov (1 , p.28] (1868). Liouville had to deal with the so called complementary functions, which gave him much trouble - Liouville (2, p.94-105) (1832), [4] (1834). The representation of fractional calculus free of this idea was given by Letnikov [1] (1868). The solution of the Abel equation I� cp = on the whole line was first obtained by Liouville [5, p.277] (1834) in the form
cp = -f!:_- a
f' .
f
As regards integrals of purely imaginary order (5.18), see the references in § 4.1 (notes to § 2.4). Equations (5.21 )-(5.23) were found by Liouville (2, p.121-123] (1832), a rather strict proof being later given by Letnikov [1, p.38-44] (1868). Relations of the type (5.25) are contained in the hand-book by Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi [2, 13.2 (7)]. The result (5.16) first appeared in Kober [1] (1940) in the case of the half-axis. Notes to § 5 .2. Theorems 5.1, 5.2 were proved by Rubin [22] { 1986). We also note that transformations of the type (5.34) were known long ago, as for example, Isaacs [1] , p.175 (1953). Notes to § 5.3. Theorem 5.3 was proved by Hardy and Littlewood [3] (1928) by means of rearrangement of functions - Hardy, Littlewood and Polya [2, p.348]. There is known a proof of this theorem which is elementary in the sense that it uses no other means except a long chain of Holder and Minkowsky inequalities - Solonnikov [1] (1962). There are proofs based on interpolation methods - see the references in § 29.1 (notes to § 25.3) concerning similar theorem for multidimensional (Riesz) fractional integration. In the proof of the necessity conditions of Theorem 5.3 we follow Stein [2, p.139]. The counterexample (5.41) was given by Hardy and Littlewood [3] (1928). In the same paper Theorem 5.4 was also proved for the operator I�+ but under more strict assumptions concerning the involved parameters. The case 1J. = Otp - 1 was considered in the paper [6, p.363] (1936) of the same authors. Theorem 5.4, under the assumptions stated in this theorem, was proved for the operator If:+ by Flett (3] (1958). The case p = q = 1, 1J. - 1 was dealt with in Bosanquet [2, p.13] (1934). The proof for the operator I� in the case m = 01, suitable for p = 1, can be also found in Miller [1] (1959). Theorem 5.4 for the operator I� was proved by Okikiolu [3a] (1966), but with m :f. 0. In this paper he also proved inequalities of the type (5.49) for the operator I� - If. under assumptions given in (5.49) . but w1th - 01 i . P The statement of Theorem 5.4 for the operator I�+ was in fact already made in Section 3 see Theorem 3.7 and § 4.1 (notes to §§ 3.3, 3.4).
<
1
<1
-
§ 9. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 2
I6I
Theorem 5.5 which generalizes Theorem 5.4 in the case p =F I , was proved by Rubin [22] (I986) . . Theorem 5.7 with p = I is given in Hille and Phillips [I , p.68I]. Notes to §§ 5o4-5o6o The integral (5.57) was already present in Weyl [I , p.302] (I9I7). Its appearance here had, however, an episodic character. As an independent object of investigation, the fractional derivative in the form (5.57) and in more general form (5.80), arose in Marchand [I] (I927) , where it was comprehensively studied, we refer also to § 9.2 (note 5.1 1 ) below. So it is now accepted that (5.57) - (5.58) is referred to as the Marchaud fractional derivative. Definition 5.I goes back to Hadamard, who introduced the idea of the finite part of the integral - Hadamard (2, ch. III]. The value of the normalizing factor in (5.80) in the form (5.8I) was already known to Marchaud [I] (I927). He also used the "truncated" expressions (5.59) , (5.80'). The Laplace transforms of these truncated derivatives were evaluated by Berens and Westphal [2]. Notes to § 5o 7 The representation of the semigroup theory and of fractional powers of operators may be found in many books and papers. We refer, for example, to the books by Dunford and Schwartz [I] , Yosida [2], Hille and Phillips [I], Butzer and Berens [I], Krasnosel'skii, Zabreiko, Pustyl'nik and Sobolevskii [I]. The definition (5.84) of a fractional power of an operator (the abstract analogue of the Marchaud derivative) is due to Balakrishnan [3] (I960) . We note Lions and Peetre [I , p.54] (I964) where the truncated construction (5.85) was used to characterize the domain of definition of the fractional power (-A)0 in the case of integer a. This was generalized to the case of arbitrary a 0 by Berens, Butzer and Westphal [I] (I968) . The realization of fractional integra-differentiation in the form (5.82) , (5.84) in the spaces is contained in Bakaev and Tarasov [I] (I978). The paper by Hughes [2] (I977) is also relevant. It develops the theory of semigroups of unbounded operators which includes the case of the Riemann-Liouville operators Ig+ in Lp (O, oo ). See also Lanford and Robinson [I] (I989). In connection with the theory of fractional powers of operators many papers may be mentioned. We indicate, for example, Krasnosel'skii and Sobolevskii [I], Balakrishnan [I]-[3], Yosida [I] , J. Watanabe [I] , Komatsu [I]-[6] , Kato [2]-[4], Butzer an d Berens [I] , Westphal [I], [2] , Howel and Westphal [I] , Yoshinaga (2], Yoshikawa [I], Hirsch [I], Fattorini [I]. Notes to §§ 6ol-6 o3o The space /0 (Lp ) , I < p < I/a, of fractional integrals of Lp-functions as an independent object for investigation appeared in Samko [7] (I969), [9] (I970), [1 1] (I97I ) , [I4] (I973). The representation in Section 6 is based on (I4] and follows in part the book by Samko [3I , § I]. Theorem 6.I and Lemma 6.I were proved in Samko (I4] (I973), see also Samko [3I , pp.9-I4). The statement of Theorem 6.I was known earlier in the case p = 2 for functions cp E L 2 (R1) which have compact support - see Stein and Zygmund [2, p.253) (I965), where the modification (I2.1) of fractional integration was considered - and in the case of a half-axis - see Berens and Westphal [2] (1968) - under the additional assumption that the function itself belongs to Lp . The characterization of the space /0 (Lp ) presented in Theorem 6.2, was given in Samko (14] in terms of (6.18), but in a weaker form. As regards the version (6.19) , it was proved by Samko [23] (1977) in the multidimensional case for Riesz fractional integrals. The characterization of the space l0 (Lp ) n Lp in t erms of (6.19) with the strong restriction 1 < p < 1 (2a) in the sufficiency part was given by Herson and Heywood [1] (1974). In the complete form the proof of Theorem 6.2 was presented in Samko [31]. The space (6.28) first appeared in Samko [17], [18] (1976), [20] ( 1977) in the multidimensional case. Its characterization in the form (6.29) was obtained in Samko [17) (1976) for p � r � p/(1 - ap) in the multidimensional case as well. The property, stated in Remark 6.1 , was proved in Samko [27), [31] (1978). The statement on the change of sign of real-valued functions in Lr n /0(Lp ) , 1 � r < 1/1 - a, was noted in Samko [14]. Theorem 6.3 was given in Samko [13] (1971 ). Notes to §§ 6o4 and 6o5o The sufficiency test of Theorem 6.4 was noted in Samko [14] (1973). Theorem 6.5 in a more general form and in the multidimensional case was obtained by Samko [26]. Theorem 6.7 was proved in Samko [14). The assertion (6.40) is due to Hardy and Littlewood [3] (1928), who considered the periodic case, the non-periodic example being noted in Samko [8] (I969) , [I4] (1973). The estimate (6.42) is close to (13.62) , see below. The estimate (6.43) was given in Samko (27, § 1] (1978). o
>
Cw
f(x)
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
162
Notes to § 7.1 . Relation (7.1) was first given by Kober [3, Lennna 3] (1941 ) under the asswnptions 0 < a � 1, tP(t), 1tl- 0 rP(t) E L1 (R 1 ) (cf. Theorem 7.1). Notes to § 7.2. Relation (7.14) was apparently first noted by Doetsch [1 , p.301] (1937) with a > 0 or 1 < a � and 1,0(0) = IP'(O) = · · · = = 0. It was, however, well known earlier in the case of integer a. Relation (7.14) was proved in Widder [2] (1946) (the first ed. in 1941 ) in tenns of the inverse Laplace transform - see Subsection 9.2 (note 7.3) below. Lennna 7.1 and Theorems 7.2 and 7.3 have not been published elsewhere. Notes to § 7.3. Expressions (7.20) and (7.21) were first published by Kober [1 , Theorems 5 (a), 5(b)], 1940, in the space Lp(O, oo), a > 0 and 1 � p < oo for (7.1 7) and 1 � p < 1/a for (7.18) . Theorem 7.6 was established by Vu Kim Tuan [2] (1985). Relation (7.28) with the formal interpretation of fractional integro-differentiation was already written down by Lambe [1] (1939). Its strict formulation for fractional derivatives treated in the complex plane as a generalization of the Cauchy relation (see (22.3311) or (22.21)) can be found in Mikolas [3a] (1962). Notes to §§ 8.1 and 8.2. The idea of introducing the space <) was suggested by Semyanistyi [1] ( 1960). It was developed by Lizorkin [1] (1963), who introduced this concept into function theory practice and widely used it in the theory of Liouville differentiation of one and many variables. We refer also to the paper by Lizorkin [5] (1969). We consider it in Subsection 8.2 while discussing the space <). We note also Yoshinaga [1] (1964), where some properties of <) were investigated. The space V of test functions, close to the space was introduced by Veber [2] (1974). This space differs from by the right-sided finiteness of its functions. It is also invariant relative to fractional integro-differentiation I� , V�. Veber [4] (1976) investigated also convolutions and Fourier transforms in V' in connection with the applications to differential equations of fractional order. The statement of the type of Lennna 8.2 on the boundedness of fractional integration operators � in Lp(O, 1 ) was first noted in Kalisch [1] (1967). Relations (8.17)-(8.20) have apparently not been noted elsewhere. The case = 0 in (8.20) was indicated in Bredimas [1, p.23] (1973), within the framework of Schwartz's approach and under a different interpretation of fractional integro-differentiation - via fractional order differences, see § 9.2 (note 8.5) below. We deal with such an interpretation in the case of ordinary functions in § 20. Notes to § 8.3. The approach to fractional integro-differentiation of generalized functions presented here is due to Schwartz [1 , v.2, p.30] (1950). It is represented in Gel'fand and Shilov [2, p.149]. Notes, to § 8.4. This approach via an adjoint operator was developed on the half-axis in the papers by Erdelyi and McBride [1] (1970), Erdelyi [15] (1972), [17] (1975), McBride [2] (1975), [4] (1977). In the brief representation of this approach we followed the papers by McBride [2], [4], where the spaces Jp l • :Tp and Fp!J were in particular defined and investigated. The further development of results obtained there and other similar is discussed in the book by McBride [6] (1979). The space <) + , <) of Lizorkin's type in the case of the half-axis were introduced in Rubin [27] ( 1987), where fractional integration in the spaces <) , (<) )' was studied. Notes to § 8.5. The invariance of the spaces Cg" ([a, b]), C ([a, b]) under fractional integration was observed in the paper by Veber and Urdoletova [1] (1974), where this was the starting point of considering fractional integro-differentiation of generalized functions on a finite interval [a , b] . Later on such spaces were used in the paper by Estrada and Kanwal [1] (1985), devoted to solving - in generalized functions - various classes of integral equations including singular ones (with Cauchy kernel) , the Abel integral equation and others. The solution in generalized functions of the equation
-n -
'P(n-l) (o)
n
6_,
6_
��
k
+
+ +
I X
a
'P(-r)d-r
[h(x) - h(-r)] l -a
=
f(x),
x>a
6
§
9. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 2
1 63
was in particular given there, we refer to fractional integration operators connected with such as equation in § and in § (notes to §
18.2
23.1
18.2).
9.2. Survey of other results (relating to §§ 5-8) 5.1. Liouville fractional differentiation
('D �J)(x), 0 < a < 1, may be considered in the form
lim .!!.._ ( 'D -a J)(x) = _ r{1 1- a) N-oo dx
N
f (tf-(t)dtx)a
(9.1 )
instead of (5.6) ( Cossar This definition is convenient for its applicability to functions with worse behaviour at infinity in comparison with (5.6). From this point of view the approach has something in common with the Marchaud definition (5.58) of the fractional derivative. For Cossar proved the relation
[1]).
{9.1)
:r:
(9.1)
[1]
('D � J)(x) = ( 1>6_J){x) - r{1 ':_ a) {9.1)
[8]
f (t ����a ' 00
x < b.
b
The construction was used in Bosanquet for studying the conditions of the existence of locally summable solutions of Abel's equation over an infinite interval. In this paper the following is representable by a conventionally convergent statements were in particular proved: i ) if fractional integral = 0 < a < then necessarily where = is the Cossar derivative The extension of this inversion statement to the case of the integral interpreted as (C, p)-summable at infinity was later on given by Isaacs ii) in order that be represented by the conventionally convergent integral = 0
J(x) ( l�cp)(x), {9.1).
J(x) 1,
{'D �J)(x) cp{x) ('D �J)(x) l�cp, [3]. J(x) J(x) (I�cp){x), 1, locally summable function cp(x), it is necessary and sufficient that 1::: a J E AG{[a, b]) for all a and b and
J
J
b
00
(t - x) a- l dt (s - t) -a-l f{s)ds -+ 0 b
:r:
b -+
x.
2.1
oo for almost all This is an extension of Tamarkin's Theorem to the case of the as whole real line and of locally summable solutions. The above statements were extended by Choudhary to the equations
[1]
J k(t - x)cp(t)dt 00
=
J(x), x
>
0.
:r:
4.2
kemel l{t)
2.3))
of Sonine type (see § {note under the assumption that there exists a such that holds. The Cossar derivative was used by Trebels in his investigations of fractional differentiation in the space in connection with Fourier-multiplier problems, this space being a natural generalization of the bounded variation function space and well-suited to problems of fractional calculus. We refer also to Gasper and Trebels where the Cossar derivative found an application in consideration of more complicated function spaces aimed at multiplier problems. We refer to Carbery, Gasper and Trebels where these spaces were shown to coincide with the space of the localized Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals.
(4.211)
BVa (R�)
[1], [2]
[1)-[4)
Hankel
RL{q,-y)
[1],
WBVq,-y
CHAPTER
164
2.
FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
Gasper and Trebels also considered in
wbvq,-y
Fourier-Jacobi multiplier problems in tenns of spaces
[1]-[4]
connected with discrete fractional differences introduced by Bosanquet.
5 .2.
The ''truncated" fractional integral
(I+ ,N cp)(x) = may be considered. H c,o(t) the norm of
E
�
r( )
z
cp( (x - t)l -a , J z -N t)dt
N > O,
Lp(R1 ) , 1 < p < 1/a , then I+ , N cp --+ If. cp almost everywhere and in
Lq(R1 ) , q = p/(1 - ap).
The almost everywhere convergence is obtained by means of
the Holder inequality. The convergence in
Lq may be obtained by the Banach-Steinhaus theorem.
One may also use the representation
- oo - Samko
[14,
Theorem
2 and Lemma 2].
If. cp = N 1/r (a) lim J cp(x - t)ta - l dt of functions cp(t) which do not necessarily vanish at infinity was N-oo 0 carried out by Love [1]. He defined the space I>,., 0 < a � A < 1, of functions cp(t) for which z T there exists a function w(T) , T 0 (depending on cp(t)) such that j cp(t)dt � w(T) and z limit for x if A > a, J t>.. - l dw(t) < oo. It was shown that if cp E I>,. , then If. c,o exists as a uniform 1 and as a limit for almost all x if A = a. The case of almost periodic functions (uniformly almost 5 .3.
A thorough investigation of conventionally convergent fractional integrals
I
>
00
l
periodic functions and the almost periodic functions of Stepanov) was especially considered in
this paper. Some results concerning fractional integrals of functions non vanishing at infinity may also be found in Geisberg
1/Jn (:.r:) =
(3]
and Bosanquet
[8]. (5 .16), (5.17), (5.16') of fractional integration by parts similarly to the case of a finite interval as in § 4.2 (note 2.6), to construct biorthogonal systems of functions. Erdelyi [3], who suggested this idea, constructed biorthogonal systems of functions on the half-axis (O, oo) expressed in terms of confluent hypergeometrical functions, starting from (5.161). A given a) initial biorthogonal system {c,on , 1/lm } (see § 4.2 (note 2.6)) was chosen as c,on (x) = L� (2x), 5:4.
One may use the results
. n e -2zxa L�a) (2x) where L�a) (x) = ,hx-a ez -£;-(e -zxn+a ) = ?: (��j) (�!)'
Laguerre polynomials.
5 .5 integral
Laguerre polynomials
are the
J =O
L�a) (x)
under the assumption that Re a
<
-n.
(see above) admit a representation by the fraetional
This was used by Srivastava
fractional integrals of functions which have the form
[4]
for the evaluation of
e -&t P(t), P(t) being a polynomial.
§ 9. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 2
165
5.6 The fractional integration operator taken in the form
(9.2)
(notation due to Erdelyi [4]) is bounded in the space Lp(R ) if 11 > -1/p'. This follows from Theorem 1 .5. In Erdelyi [4) a modification of the operator (9.2) was suggested in the form
�
(9.3)
which differs from (9.2) by a finite-dimensional operator. Such as operator is bounded in if f1 > -1/p' and m [-fl - 1/p') if f1 -1/p' , Lp(R ), 1 p oo, under the choice m 11 - 1 /p ::F - 1, -2, . . . . The expression
�
< <
=0
(""" ...+ 'P )( s) ;.uu,;,a
<
=
i()
= r( fl (fl+ + +1/p'1/p'- _ i() (""" ;.JJ '-'P)( s ) , s = i( + 1 1p, r
01
for the Mellin transform (1.112) of the fractional integral (9.3) was also obtained in this paper in the case 'P E Lp(R1 ), 1 � p � 2 (cf. (7.22)) . Similar results were also obtained for the right-hand sided integral of the type (9.3) with a variable lower limit of integration. The boundedness of the operator (9.3) in the weighted space Lp (R , :ciA ) was considered by Rooney [4]. 5 .7. By extending Theorem 5.5 we give here a statement similar to Theorem 3.12 in the case of an infinite interval. Namely, we consider the boundedness of fractional integration operators from the space Lp(O, p) into the Holderian space (0; r ) , 1/p at 1 + 1/p, 0 being the axis or half-axis. Let p (:c) be the weight function {5.39). Let us introduce the notations
�
H; - 1/P
if if
c5� ) = -a - :
1
-
> Otp - 1 '
0 < J.i.k � atp - 1,
At = {k : k E {2, . . . , n},
P k > O},
A2 = {k : k E {1, . . . , n},
J.i. k > 0};
L c5k +
k EA 1
"' "
< <
{
1 - at - eo + 1/p, eo > O ,
1
= -J.l. - J.l. l -
• • •
0,
if 2 - ap - p
if J.t.o > 1 - p,
- a + (2 - J.t.o )/P
J.I.O
ek >
if J.I.O
< J.I.O � p - 1,
� 2 - atp - p,
- J.l. n ;
if J.I.O > 1 - p, if J.I.O � 1 - p, e >
0,
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
166
c5�) = -2a + (2 - P.o) /p -
L c5k;
A: eA:�
for 0 =
. R+1 ,
for 0 =
R1 ,
for 0 =
R. +1 ,
for 0 =
R1 .
The following statement is valid (Rubin [22]). Let 1 p oo, 1/p a 1/p + 1 , p(x) = n (1 + x 2 ) 1JI2 n lx - XJ: IIJ• ' let the assumption (5.47) be satisfied in the case Xj; 0 = R�
< <
< <
E
k= 1 and let IJA: satisfy (5.48) with J.1. 1 < p - 1 also. The operator I8+ is bounded from Lp(R�; p) p into 'H; - 1 / (R� , r + ) · The prime here appears in the case J.I.O 5 2 - ap - p and implies the 1 ; p). absence of the null effect at infinity, i.e. in general lim r+ (x)(I8+ <,e)(x) ::1: 0, for
5.8. There are generalizations of a weighted Theorem 5.5 to the case of one- and two weighted estimates with arbitrary weights. Andersen and Heinig [1] obtained sufficient conditions for the boundedness of the fractional integral operators (5.1) and (5.3), and of more general Erdelyi-Kober operators (18.1 ) and (18.3), from Lp(R� ; p) into Lq(R� ; r). They proved, for example, the following result for the fractional integral (5.1 ) let 1 5 p � q 5 oo, 0 a 1 and let p(x) and r(x) be nonnegative weight functions on R�; if there exists {3, 0 5 {3 5 1 , such that
F., _ , (p,A) = for all
)(
( � l(t - Aj(<>-I).Br(t)l' dt
J
1/q
:
A
I
< <
)
I(A - t)(<>-l)(H1lP' P(t)I-P ' dt
1 /p �
c
< +oo
A > 0, then I8+ is bounded from Lp (R�; p) into Lq (R�; r ).
Andersen and Sawyer [1] found necessary and sufficient conditions for the fractional integrals (5.1) and (5.3) on the half-axis to admit a one-weighted (i.e. r = p) estimate. They proved, for example, that if 0 a 1, 1 p i-, = - a , then the operator I8+ is bounded from
�
�
Lp(R�, p) into Lq(R�, p) if and only if the inequality
< <
< <
holds. They also found necessary and sufficient conditions for the weight p (or r) to have the property that there exists the weight r (respectively p) such that I[f+ or I� is bounded from
Lp(R�; p) into Lq(R� ; r).
Stepanov [1]-(5] completely solved the problem of two-weighted estimates for the fractional integral (5.1 ) in the case a � 1. He proved, for example, that for arbitrary nonnegative functions p(x) and r(x) on R� the operator I[f+ ' a � I , is bounded from Lp(R� , p) into Lq(R� ; r),
§ 9. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 2
1 < p � q < oo if and only if
also
167
max sup F 1 ( ,8, A) < oo P = 0 , 1 A >O a-
obtained similM results for the cases p = 1 and q = 1, and (see Fa 1(,8, A) above) . He in terms of the function Fa 1 (,8, A) found conditions for the operator I�+ to be compact from Lp (R , p) into Lq (R , r). The results analogous to listed ones were obtained by Stepanov in the case 1 � q < p < oo. In the case 1 < p = q < oo other conditions were obtained by MMtin-Reyes and Sawyer [1]. Stromberg and Wheeden [1] gave sufficient conditions for multidimensional fractional integrals (see § 29 below) and in particular for the fractional integrals (5.2) and (5.3) on the real axis to admit polynomial weight estimates. We fonnulate one of their results for I+.. Let 1 < p < oo, 0 < 1 /p - 1/q � a, ,8 = a - 1/p + 1/q. Let also
�
�
II
also
n
Q (x) =
k= 1
n
l x - xk lp" '
-00
< X 1 < X2 <
• • •
< Xn < +oo ,
k= 1
where ,8k = min(p.k , ,8) and let a nonnegative measurable function Muckenhoupt condition
1 1
I
� w (, ) d
"
(
)
I
w(3:) - lfp'
L: 1-'k � ,8,
w(x) satisfy the so-called
p-1 �
c
< + oo,
1 < p < oo,
(known also as Ap -condition) for every interval I on R1 . Then I+ is bounded from Lp (R1 ; p) into Lq (R 1 ; r ) . 5 .9. Hardy and Littlewood's Theorem 5.3 on the mapping property of fractional integration from Lp into Lq , q = p/(1 - ap), was extended to Orlicz spaces by O ' Neil [2]. Let L (R 1 ) be an Orlicz space generated by an N-function. We use here the terminology of the book by Krasnosel'skii and Rutitskii (1]. O ' Neil [2] showed that if
M-
1)
uM1(u) � p M(u)
then the fractional integration operator where
c-
1 (x ) =
�
J M- 1 (u)u- 1 -a du. 0
>
1
1,
f M-u1 +1 (u)a du
2)
< oo,
0
I�, 0 < a <
1, maps LM ( R1 ) continuously into LC ( R 1 )
A somewhat weaker assertion was given by Sharpley [1] �
using a different method. We note that C(x) is &h N-function under the assumption 1 ) . We must add that O 'Neil dealt with the multidimensional case. See Gel'man and Yasakov [1] concerning the mapping properties of potential type operators in the spaces L (0), mes O < oo. 5 .10. Geisberg (3] considered MMchaud fractional derivatives (D + J )(x), 0 < a < 1, X e R1 ' of functions f(x) which are locally Holderian of order more than a, bounded and such that there
also
M-
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
168 N- oo
exists
lim
N- 1
0
J f(x)dx = c.
He in particular showed that
-N
I+ Df. /
E
/(x) - c for such
functions. 5.11. Marchaud [1] also defined and investigated a construction more general than what we refer to as the Marchaud fractional derivative - (5 .80) . That is Marchaud considered (see pp.348-351 of his paper) constructions with generalized finite differences:
Ja(x) = "'Y(1a) ki
where
oo
f 0
l
L: cif(x - kit) i =O _;__t-:"1....,.+-a-- dt, I = [a] + 1,
are arbitrary positive increasing numbers, and the coefficients l
.
Ci
are bounded by
L: Ci � = 0, j = 0, 1, . . . , I - 1, the normalizing constant being equal to "'Y(a) . = i :O l r( - a) L: ci kr. In the case a = 1, 2, . . . one must pass to a limit as a - m = 1 , 2, . . . . He i :O showed that if /(x) = lf.v> then the Liouville fractional derivative 'Df. / coincides with /a(x) and thus doesn't depend on the choice of ki . Under the choice ki = i, Ci = (- 1 ) i (D the expression for r•(x) coincided with (5.80). 5.12. The so-called divided differences [x l t ... ,xn + l ; /] = ([x2 , . .. , Xn +l ; /] - [x l t ... ,xn ; /])/ (xn+l - xn ), [x; /] = J(x), in connection with fractional integro-differentiation were considered by Popoviciu [1]. He showed in particular (see p.39 of his paper) that if such differences are bounded, then f(x) has continuous fractional derivatives of order a < n . conditions
5 .1 3 . In the paper by Gearhart [1], where fractional integration was considered from the point of view of semigroup theory, subspaces in L 2 ( 0, oo ) were there defined which were invariant relative to the left translation (Tt f)(x) = f(x + t), t > 0, and such that the operator ]� was bounded in these subspaces. For these purposes the approximation operators
(9.4)
were introduced - compare this with the modification (18.64) of fractional integration - which were the unitary equivalent to Toeplitz operators on Hardy subspaces Based on some results of Beurling and Lax for Toeplitz operators concerning spaces invariant relative to translation, the author constructed a series of spaces M C L2 (0, oo ) which admit a strong limit for w:r. He also considered the question as to whether this limit coincides with the direct form of the operator I� . The limiting case a = i71 of operators of purely imaginary order is also treated in the paper. 5.14:. The possibility for Ig+ v> or l�v> being a constant identically: (1) (IOX+ v>)(x) E c,
H2 (Ri )·
xE or (2) (l�v>)(x) E c, x E then (1) holds if and only if /(x) =
�
R ,
In the [1]).
�
(c/r(1 - a))x-a for 0 < a < 1 and c = 0, v>(x) :: 0 for a 2:: 1 . when J (1 + t) -alv>(t)jdt < oo, (2) holds if and only if c = 0 and v>(x) 0 (Roberts
R , may be easily cleared up. Let v>(x) be locally integrable,
00
case
0
E
6.1. There is an extension of the characterization of the space JO'(Lp) to the case of the space JO'(Lp (p)] with a general weight satisfying the so called Muckenhoupt-Wheeden condition. It is given in Andersen [1], and is formulated in § 29.2 (note 26.1 1). 6.2. Theorem 6.2 on the characterization of fractional integrals of functions in Lp was extended to Orlicz space using O ' Neil 's results (see note 5.9 above) by Samko and Chuvenkov [1] .
§ 9. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 2
169
Nlunely, let conditions 1 ) and 2) from note 5.9 be satisfied and let functions M(x) and C (x) from note 5.9 satisfy the �2-condition (Krasnosel'skii and Rutitskii [1]) . In order that f(x) E Ia(LM ) , �< 1 , it is necessary and sufficient that f(x) E L(:(R1 ) and that (Df_ , ef)(x) converges in
the norm of L_M(R1) as e -+ o. Note that the function C (x) satisfies the �2-condition if and only if there exists a constant a that
a<
> 0 such
fX M-ual (u) duu -< a M -ual(u) ' 0
x � xo.
6.3. Let cp be a convolution operator. It maps continuously i ) Lr(R1), 1 � r p , into Ja(Lp) if (x) E Ia(Lq), 1/q = 1 - 1 /r ii) Lp(R1 ) into Ja(Lp) if a(x) E J.t (Lt) or (x) E J�(Lt);
a*
<
a
a
+ 1/p;
iii) Ja(Lr) into Ja(Lp) if 1 r � p 1/ and (x) E Lq(R1 ), 1/q [14), [27, p.8]). This statement may be deduced from the relation
<
< a
a
=
1 - 1 /r
+ 1 /p (Samko
The validity of the latter is easily obtained under the above assumptions by taking into account the obviousness of the equality for "good" functions and boundedness of the operators in the left and right-hand sides in the corresponding spaces. 6 .4. Let wr (f, t) be the integral continuity modulus (6.31) of a function f(x) on R�. The following generalization: (9.5) of the estimate (6.39) is valid, 1
for the operator K cp =
< p < 1/a . It is a particular case of the general estimate
X
J0 K(x - t)cp(t)dt (Karapetyants).
7.1. Equation (7.1) for the Fourier transform of a fractional integral and proved for cp E Lt(R1 ) is extended to functions cp E Lp(R1 ), 1 p � 2, 1 p 1/ , if the convergence of the Fourier transforms :Fcp and :F(/�cp) in (9.1 ) is treated in the norm of Lp ' and L q ' ' respectively, q = p( 1 - p) -1 - Okikiolu [2] - where the Riesz potential over R1 was considered. We note that the proof in [2] may be simplified if one uses generalized functions on the space � studied in § 8.2. is worth of 1 , p = 2/(1 Added in proof. The estimate II Felo+ cpllp � cll cpllp , mentioning (Titchmarsh [1], s. 4.12). 7 .2. In the book by Widder [2, pp.73 and 74) the following statement similar to Theorem 7.2 was proved.
<
< < a
a
0
Theorem 9.1 .
Let
cp(x)
E
Lt (0, b)
for every
>
b 0
and let the integral
convergent. Then the relation
� 211"'
-y+ioo
f
-y-ioo
(Lcp} (p) ePX dp = (Jij+ cp) {x) < X 2: 0, Per
{ 0,
X < 0,
+ a),
J0 e -Pot lcp(t) l dt be 00
2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS is valid for � 1, "f > Po , > 0 or for 0 < � 1 provided that the function
CHAPTER
0t
0t
'Y
transfonn
I (xda+(t)t)P = f (x), (5 3) [0, R], R O, 00
0
0,
p>
by applying the fractional integral . , the complex-valued function t having a bounded variation on every interval > of the real axis. have fractional derivatives D f 7 .4. The question, whether functions f was answered in terms of the Laplace transfonn by Berens and Westphal be the Whittaker function. Varma defined integral transform 7.5. Let
a( )
�
(x) E Lp(R )
�
Lp (R )
[1)
Wk , m (x)
I
[1).
+
E
00
(W
(9.6)
(1.119),
(9.6) in /�+
k + = 1/2.
3
7.3
I
00
wk , m iP(x) = X (xt) -k -l / 2e -xtf 2wk+ l / 2, m (xt)
(9.7)
xaf 2 +k -m (I�+ tm - k
of functions
i
00
m + , O (xt j'll + al,····'lm + Ot m )1P (t)dt (G 1P)(x) = x Gm ml+ , l 'l l l · · · ·'lm , P (1.95)
(9.8)
0
with the Meijer G-function in the kernel, which was called the Meijer-Laplace transform. It is reduced to the Vanna transform in the case m m, p and to the generalized Meijer transform in the case p -m m In the papers by Mathur the integral transforms of functions and were found.
1Jm = 2 = 0 atm = = - k, 'f}m = - k. x - J£-V (I�+ tv
{9.6)
U;t";a iP)(x)
a 1 = = Ot m - 1 = 0, Otm = -1/2 - k, (9.7) a 1 = = Otm - 1 = 0, [1], [2] (9.8) · · ·
· · ·
§ of
9. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 2
171
7 .6. A series of papers is concerned with the evaluation of special type of integral transfomlS fractional integrals. Mathur found Meijer integral transforms defined in § 1 .4, and the
(2] transform x -1 J :.aFt (.X, J.Li v; -t/x)c.p(t)dt with the Gauss function {1.72) in the kernel for functions 0 x"(Ig+
G(s) = AnF(st. · · · • sn) and Gt(s) = An - tFt(st . · · · • Sm - l • Sm+ b · · · • sn) are related to each other by the operation of fractional differentiation: G(s) = f,y;t�; V�+ Gt (s), see also Koh and Conlan (1]. 7.8. In the paper by Smith [1] fractional integrals (5 .3} and fractional derivatives (5.6 ) were applied to obtain connections between Laplace-Stieltjes transforlllS J e -xt t P da(t) with 0 p > 0 and p = 0, as well as inversion formulae for these transforlllS. Here a( t) is a real valued function of a bounded variation on every interval (0, R), R > 0, satisfying conditions a(O+ ) = 0, a (t) = 2 -1 [a(t + 0) + a(t - 0)]. 7 .9. A formula of the type (7.28} - the integral analogue of Taylor's series expansion was applied in Lambe (1] to derive integral representations for some special functions namely the Gauss and Legendre confluent hypergeometric functions. This was only done formally. 8.1. The space � considered in subsection 8.2 is dense in Lp (Rl ), 1 < p < for any function f E Lp and each e > 0 there exists a function c.p(x) E � such that II J - c.pllp < e . This was proved by Lizorkin (5] by means of averages which were called by him completely balanced. In Samko (29] another proof of this denseness was given. 8.2. In the papers by Lamb [2], [3] a certain approach to the consideration of fractional integration I� of generalized functions on the whole real line was developed. The investigation was based on the theory of fractional powers of operators in Frecbet spaces, developed by the author - Lamb [1]. Operators I� were shown to be fractional powers of operators Il treated in then functions
00
oo:
the spaces
and were shown to realize a homeomorphism of the space onto itself, provided that J.L > in the case of positive sign, and J.L < in the case of negative sign. See also Lamb where these statements were proved via Fourier multipliers technique.
0
8.3.
In Sk6rnik
[1], [2]
Vp,IJ
the fractional integration
(4],
J0 exl-t2 (xr(�)- •
0
and
the corresponding fractional differentiation were considered in spaces of generalized functions. The main attention was paid to defining the spaces of generalized functions where fractional differentiation is uniquely inverted. In order to "sift out" generalized functions which infringe this uniqueness, spaces of generalized functions were defined which were equal to zero at the point = in a certain sense given by Lojasewich and others.
x 0
1 72
CHAPTER 2. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS
Fp,IJ
8 .4. Let be the space of test functions defined by McBride [2], [3] - § 8.4. Ahuja [1] considered mapping properties of the Erdelyi-type operators (9.3) and of more general ones in the spaces 8.5. An interesting development of Schwartz's approach, connected with differences of fractional order, was suggested in a series of papers by Bredimas [1]-[5]. The fractional differentiation operator was defined in these papers as
Fp ,IJ.
00
(9.9} (compare such an approach in § 20 in the case of ordinary functions). It was shown that under the appropriate interpretation of this limit, the restriction of the operator (9.9) onto the subspace of the Schwartzian generalized function with a support on the half-axis coincides with fractional integration (of order -a} of generalized functions given by Schwartz and represented in § 8.3. 8 .6. McBride [7] defined fractional powers of ordinary differential operators
R�
(9.10) and considered their properties in the space
I
Fp,IJ of the generalized functions discussed in § 8.4.
plays an essential role. The case m -:1; 0 was treated in •= 1 McBride [7], (8] by means of Erdelyi-Kober operators (see (18.1)-(18.2}). The case m = 0 was investigated by Lamb and McBride [1] via the spectral approach used in the theory of fractional powers of operators; the results for m = 0 were shown to be obtainable as limiting cases of the results for m > 0 in a sense. Index laws = and = for fractional integro differentiation (see § 10 for the second of these laws) were extended in McBride [8] to the operators in (9.10) and operators = ( - 1 ) "xa ,.4- I 1) xa ,. . . . :ra 2 1J:ra t i, = and in McBride [9} to the operators defined via Mellin transforms by the relation Here the number
m =
Ia [fJ
n
n+ l - � ai
I
I01 +f3 T01
x-P [01+Px -01
l01x-0t-{J [fJ
1>
L'
d/dx,
where h is a given fixed function, 'Y being a fixed number. Observe also the fractional calculus of operators in the surveying paper by McBride [1 1], where one may find other references as well. 8.7. Vladimirov [3] extended the Schwartz approach (8.22} to the case of distributions over the field of p-adic numbers. He studied some properties of the corresponding fractional integration and, in particular, proved the semigroup property.
T01
9.3. Tables of fractional integrals and derivatives We do not provide large tables of fractional integrals and derivatives here, but confine ourselves to the small Tables 9.1-9.3 below for fractional integro-differentiation of Riemann-Liouville and for that of Liouville I� and refer to other tables in literature. Good tables of a rather large number of fractional integrals of various elementary and special functions are contained in the handbook of Erdelyi , Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi [3, ch.13]. A great deal of fractional integrals of various functions may be found in the handbooks of Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev [1]-[3] in the broken representation, but not being singled out especially as fractional integration formulae. Comparatively small but interesting tables are contained also in the papers by Higgins (5], Oldham and Spanier [1], Tremblay [1 , pp.91-92, 426-433], Lavoie, Osler and Tremblay [1], Lavoie, Tremblay and Osler [1], Nishimoto [6] , Osler [1] , [3) .
I�+
9. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 2 173 Table 9.1 ( I:+
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
A�
,..
1 74
CHAPTER
2.
FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ON THE REAL AXIS Table 9.2
1 2 3 4 5 6
(J+
Table 9.3
<,o(x) , xER1 1 x"Y -1 , x > O 2 (ax+b)'Y -1 3 [(x+a 1 )a + l72 )(x+b ) e -.>.x 4 5 e -.>. ../X sin >.x } 6 { cos >.x sin >.../X 7 { cos >.../X} sin -yx } 8 e- .>.x { cos-yx 9 x- 11 1 2 Jv (..Xx) Y.,(.>.x) } 10 x- v/2 { K.,(>.x )
(J�<,o)(x), xER1 , a E C r( 1-a--y) xa +-y -1 ' Re (a + "'Y) < 1 ' x> O r( 1--y ) �g=�)a"YJ (ax+b) a+"Y -1 , Re (a+ "'Y) < 1 , I arg(a /b) l< 11" -# [(x+a x+b)j-1/ 2 Re a > - 1 t(a + 1 /2) ( ..fo+d)(+Jx+b )2<> ' _x -a e ->.x , Re ..X > O 2a + 1 /2 11"-1 /2 a 1 /2-a x(2a + 1)/4 Ka + 1 / 2 { ..XVx} Re ..X > O sin(.>.x+ ar/2) } 1 ..X > O1 Re a < 1 _x -a { cos(.>.x+ ar/2) /2 a-1 (.>.../X) } 1 ..X > 01 Re a < 1/2 2 v'i ( X ) x(2a + 1)/4 { YJ-a-l1 /2(.>.../X -a- /2 ) sin( x+ a tp ) (.>.2 +-y 2 )<>72 { cos("Y"Yx+ a tp ) } "'Y > 01 Re ..X >'0,
e - A.r
1
.
We note also that many fractional integrals and derivatives of elementary and non-elementary functions were found long ago by Letnikov [6]-[8] , [10], [11], (1882-1888). Tables 9.1-9.3 above contain both fractional integrals and derivatives. The relations in these tables may be obtained provided that we take Re a > O first, and extended then to the case Re a � O by analytic continuation with respect to the parameter a . We note also that the condition Re # > O connected with the convergence of an integral at the point x=a may also be omitted if the integral 1::+ is understood in the sense of integration along the Pochhammer loop described in § 22.2. Some relations are given in the two-level representation as accepted in the handbooks of Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev [1]-[3], see also [4) . Many relations from the mentioned tables and many new relations can also be obtained by the method suggested by Marichev [10], [1 1] - consider a general expression discussed in § 36.9. Adamchik and Marichev [1] implemented this algorithm for calculating integrals of hypergeometric functions, and in particular of fractional integrals of the Meijer G-function defined in (36.3) in the computer algebra REDUCE system.
Chapter 3 . Furt her Prop ert ies of Fract ional Int egrals and Derivat ives
In this chapter we shall continue our investigation of the properties of Riemann Liouville fractional integrals and derivatives on finite and infinite intervals of the real line. Firstly problems will be considered which will be important in Chapters 6 and 7 when studying integral equations of the first kind. Topics such as the compositions of fractional integrals and derivatives with power and exponential weights, connections between fractional and singular integrals, and linear combinations of left-sided and right-sided fractional integrals with each other are discussed. Then the characterization of fractional integrals of Lp-functions and of functions in weighted Holder spaces H� (p) on an interval will be given, and various aspects of fractional integra-differentiation in the theory of functions of real variable considered. These aspects such as the mapping properties of fractional integra-differentiation operators in Lipschitz spaces H; and fi; , the fractional differentiation of absolutely continuous functions, inequalities for fractional integrals and derivatives, connections of fractional calculus with problems of summability of series and integrals, etc. will be studied. In conclusion generalizations of the classical Leibniz rule concerning the derivative of the product of two functions will be discussed, and asymptotic expansions of fractional integrals near the end points of an interval will be derived. § 1 0 . Compositions of :Fractional Integrals and Derivatives with Weights
In this section we consider the compositions of fractional integra-differentiation operators with power, exponential and power-exponential weights in Lp-space, 15p< We also investigate the problem of the commutability for such operators. Our main attention is paid to the simple compositions of the type z'Y Ig+ z6• It should be noted that properties of these operators depend on their domains of definition and on their parameters. Integrals of purely imaginary order oo.
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
176
cannot be defined in the whole space L 1 and their operators are not bounded in this space. Therefore, as a rule such integrals will not be considered here. We shall use the following specific notation. Let Cl't , . . . , Cl'n, Cl'n+l be complex numbers such that there exists only a single number a such that Rea = min( Rea 1 , . . . , Reon, Reon+ t ). Then we put Cl'n+l = 0 and introduce the function j
j
0,
m
( a t , . . . , on ) =
If there exist Cl'j and Cl'k then the function spaces
m(
lsuch that - Q1· '
a t , . . . , on )
Reai > 0, i = 1, 2, . . . , n, aj Reaj < min(O, Rea 1 , . . . , Reaj - 1 , Rea; + l , . . . , Rean ).
if there exists such that Cl'j f. Cl'k
(10.1)
but
is not defined. We also introduce special function
{
if p > 1, 0 � a < b � oo, (a, b) Lp ,.(a, b) = LLp ((a, t b); l ln xl + l) if p = 1, O � a < b � oo,
{ Lp (O, b) if Rea > 0, I0+ (Lp , • (O, b)) if Re a < 0 ; b) if Rea > 0, Lp,.(O, b)) - { Lp,.(O, if Re a < 0
(10.2)
10m+(cr)• (Lp (O, b)) -
_
10m+(cr)* (
_
I0:(Lp (O, b))
;
if Rea > 0 ,
(10.3)
if Rea < 0 ; if Rea > 0, if Re a < 0. We note that L ,.(a, b) C L (a, b) and L ,.(a, b) = L (a, b) if 0 < a < b < oo and for example x- 1 tln- 2 x E L 1 (0,t b) but x- 1tln- 2 x ¢ L1 ,.t (0, b). 10. 1 . Compositions of two one-sided integrals with power weights
As it was noted in § 2 that a semigroup property given in (2.65) is fulfilled for the fractional integrals and derivatives defined in (2.17)-(2.18) and (2.32)-(2.34)
§ 10. COMPOSITIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
I:+ I:+ f(x) = I:+ I:+ f(x), I:+ I:+ f(x) = I:t13 f(x), If_ If_ f(x) = If_ If_ f(x), If_ If_ f(x) = I:_+P f(x),
1 77
(10.4) (10.5)
According to Theorem 2.5 and Remark 2.3 we obtain the following results. Theorem 10.1. Let a and {3 be complex numbers such that the functions ( {3, + {3) and m(a, a+ {3) are defined. Then the first set of relations in (10.4) a.nd (10.5 ) are valid when f E I;:'�a ,{3,a+f3 \Lp (a, b)) and f E I�(a ,{3,a+f3) (Lp (a, b)) and the second set of results in (10. 4 ) and {10.5) are valid when f E I;:'�a , a+f3) (Lp (a, b)) and f E I�(a ,a+f3 ) (Lp (a, b)) if -oo < a < b < +oo, 1 � p < oo respectively. The results in (10.5) are also valid when b = +oo and instead of the space Lp (a, b) we shall take the weighted space Lp ((a, oo); xP (M+1 )- 2 ) when M = m( {3, -{3, a + {3, -a - {3). Remark 10. 1. If the functions m(a,{3,a + {3) and m(a,a + {3) are not defined then the statements of Theorem 10.1 are still valid under appropriate assumptions on the spaces of functions f(x). These spaces should be contracted by conditions of the existence of summable derivatives v--r; f where 1 are two or four points of 0, {3, + {3 or two or three points of 0, a, a + {3i lying on the line {1 : Re 1 = min(O, Rea, Re{3, Re(a + {3)) } or {1 : Re1 = min(O, Rea, Re(a + {3)) } , respectively. Proof. Theorem 10.1 and Remark 10.1 are direct corollaries of Theorems 2.4, 2.5 and Remark 2.3, if we take into account the imbedding Lp (a, b) C L 1 (a, b) for p > 1 on a finite interval (a, b), the notation in (10.1), the property I� (L (a, b)) = Lp (a, b) and the substitution x = a + b - y while passing from I:+ to+If_p when b < oo. If b = +oo, the theorem follows from Theorem1 10.- 16 and from 1 the relation in (10.6) if we replace x by x and f(x) by x-a-13 - f(x ) and take (10.1) into account. In view of the second result in (10.5) with b = oo and the second one in (10.4) with a = 0 after the above replacements we have the following relations with weighted factors m Q,
Q
Q , -Q,
Q,
Q
•
(10.6) (10.7) It is therefore natural to consider first the question about properties of the operators x'Y IC+ x6 • Here and below the factors x'Y and x 6 imply operators of multiplication by the functions x'Y and x6 in the indicated order. The exact description of the action of these operators is given by the following assertion. x 01 Ig+ x -a- {3 IC+ x13 f(x) = IC+ Ig+ f(x) = I;:fJ f(x), x 01 I� x -a- {3 I�x13 f(x) = I� I� f(x) = IC:.+/3 f(x).
1 78
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Let 1/J(x) E Lp{O, b), 0 < b < oo, 1 � p < oo, p{1 + ReJl) > 1 and Rea 1= 0. Then the representation 1/J(x) = I0+ xJJ f(x), f(x) E /�01)• (Lp (O, b)), takes place if and only if 1/J(x) = xJJJ0+ g(x) where g(x) E /�01)* (Lp, • {O, b)) or 1/J(x) = x JJ - e f0+ xe g 1 (x) where g1 (x) E I� 01)* (Lp (O, b)), p{1 + Rec) > 1 . The operators I0+ xJJ, xJJ 10+ and xJJ- e I0+ xe where Rea > 0, are bounded from these spaces to the space Lp ((O, b); x - P(OI+ JJ ) ).
Lemma 10.1.
Re a > 0. Part I. Necessity. Let 1/J(x) be represented in the form 1/J(x) = I0+ xJJ f(x), f(x) E Lp {O, b), 1 � p < oo. We prove that there exists a function g(x) E Lp,.{O, b)) such that the relation Proof.
The case
{1D.8)
is valid. We obtain this function by applying the operator I0+01x- JJ to {10.8) and write it in the form g(x) = dxd (xX(x)) where X(x) = (Xf)(x) = (x - 1 IJ.:;01x01 )(x -JJ- OI J0 xJJ)f(x). Applying now the inequality {5.46') twice to the operators x -+1 !J.+01x01 and x- JJ - OI I0+ xJJ we obtain that X is bounded from Lp (O, b) to Lp (O, b) provided that the conditions 0 < Re a < 1, p{1 + ReJl) > 1, 1 � p < oo, are fulfilled. Hence if f(x) E Lp{O, b) then X(x) = x - 1 !J+ g(x) E Lp{O, b). Therefore g(x) E Lp {O, b)1 when p > 1 - see also Lemma 3.2 and (3.15). If p = 1 then the conditions x- Jfi+g(x) E £ 1 {0, b) and { l ln xl + 1)g(x) E L 1 {0, b) are equivalent. This fact follows, for example, from (3.17" ) with a = 1 and A = 0 or from the relations in
b
II:
b
II:
j x - 1 j jg(t)jdtdx = j j jg(t)jdtdln x 0
0
0 0
b Jb = J :c = In x jg(t)jdt l :c=+O In xjg(x)ldx. II:
0
-
0
(10.8')
The above equivalence follows from these relations, for example, when b < 1. So we have proved by {10.2) that g(x) E Lp,.(O, b) provided that f(x) E Lp (O, b). Sufficiency. Let 1/J(x) be such that t/;(x) = xJJ I0+ g(x), g(x) E Lp,.(O, b), 1 � p < oo. We prove that there exists a function f(x) E Lp {O, b) such that (10.8) is valid. According to {10.8) and {3.16) we can take
§ 10. COMPOSITIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
179
(A 2
y ) Ot ( -y ) 3:1 ( -y 0
X-
,...., .,.- 1 I' sin a1r
t-o
X
j3: 0
1-'
dy y
-
A 2 ( x, O)
The last representation and (10.8') with replacing 9 by
< oo,
(10.8)
(10.9) which yields the representation for 1/J in the form 1/J = xl-'-£ Ig+ x£ 9 1 ( x), 9 1 ( x) E Lp (O, b). The sufficiency in this case is proved similarly or on the basis of the necessity by interchanging c and Jl, 91 and f with each other. The case Re a < 0. Part I. Necessity. Let ,P(x) be such that 1/J = Ig+ x�-' f(x), f(x) E J0;(Lp ,• (O, b)). This means f(x) = 10: fi(x) and 1/J(x) = Ig+ x�-' 10: /i(x), where /i(x) E Lp , .(O, b). Since p(1 + Rei' ) > 1 and /i(x) E Lp , .(O, b) but -Re a > 0 then by using the proof of sufficiency, proved above in Part I and the property Ig+ Io: = E we arrive at the relations
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
180
/0+ /2 E J0.t {Lp {O, b)). whereThe sufficiency in this case is proved by inverse arguments with respect to the last relations. The case Rea < 0. Part II. This proof is quite similar to that in the case Rea > 0, Part II. The last statement of the lemma follows from the above arguments and from {5.46') Using now the Dirichlet formula given in {1.32) we evaluate the composition g =
. •
X
1
J ua2 -P2 -1 {1 - ut• -P• - 1 (1 - u(1 - x/r))P2 -a• du, 0
Hence by ( 1. 73) we obtain the following representation
(10.10)
If we interchange the operators in the parentheses on the left-hand side of (10.10) with each other, then the indices 1 and 2 will be interchanged with each other too. This leads to the operator obtained from the right-hand side of ( 10.10) by using the self-transformation formula: 2 F1 (a, b; c; z)
=
(1 - zy-a- b 2Ft(c - a, c - b; c; z)
{10.11)
Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and 'fricomi [1, 2.1.4{23)]. Thus the operators on
§ 10. COMPOSITIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
181
the left-hand side of (10. 10) commute ( x lh 1;f. - lh x - a 1 ) ( x/32 1;.;. -/32 x-a2 )f( x ) =
(10.12)
( x/32 I;:f. - 132 x-a2 )( x/3t I;f_ -/3� x- a � )f( x )
under appropriate assumptions on the parameters. We denote by T12 , F and T1 2 , T21 the operators on both sides of (10.10) and (10.12), respectively. Domains of definition of these operators and the ranges onto which these domains are boundedly mapped essentially depend on the parameters of the operators and firstly on the signs of Re (a1 - /31 ) and Re (a2 - /32) . These domains may be taken to be the space b), 0 b oo, 1 � p oo, or some subspaces of b) defined by the corresponding conditions of representability. To describe these spaces more conveniently in terms of representability via x --r !J+ ,P( x ) and tP E b) the parameters in the condition p(1 + ReJl) in Lemma 10.1 must satisfy additional assumptions. It should be noted that Lemma 10.1 itself gives the main technique for such a description. In the cases when the above conditions and the domains of definition of the operators intersect with each other the values of the corresponding operators coincide on this intersection, this leading to (10.10) or
Lp(O ,
Lp(O, Lp,. (O,
< <
<
(10.12).
All the connections between T12 , T21 and F are given in Theorem Table 10.1 where a = a1 + a2 - f3t - /32 ·
10.2
and
Let some of the conditions in Ai from Table 10.1 be fulfilled. Then the operators Bj are defined on the spaces Cj C Lp(O , b), 1 � p < oo, and are bounded from Ci onto Dj C Lp(O, b) and the relations Ej are fulfilled.
Theorem 10.2.
Proof. Without loss of generality we can consider all parameters a� , a2 , {J� , /32 as real numbers. We first suppose that the conditions A1 are fulfilled. Then it follows from (5.46') that the operator x/32 I;.;. - 132 x-a2 is bounded in b) provided that p � 1, p(1 - a2) > 1. Therefore Tt 2 is bounded in b) if additionally p(1 - a t ) > 1. By using Fubini's theorem the relation in (10.10) is easily proved by direct evaluation on the set of sufficiently "good" functions f( x ) dense in b). Therefore the operator F on the right-hand side of (10.10) is also bounded on this dense set, and hence it is bounded on the whole space b). So by Theorem 1.7 (10.10) is fulfilled in b) under the assumptions A t . Using the relation in (10.11) and the symmetry of the conditions A t with the indices 1 and 2 being interchanged with each other we obtain (10.12) from (10.10). Similar arguments on the basis of the inequality in ( 3 .17"), instead of that in (5.46") , which applicable twice when = 1 and = 0 yield the statement of our theorem in the last case j = 11. It should be emphasized that the ranges onto which the operators Tt 2 and T21 map from b) do not coincide, because the operator T12 maps -/31 {xf31 J x/32a1 -a2 ; /;f. -/32 tP( x ) , ,P E onto when p 1 a2 ) > 1 and f_
Lp(O,
Lp(O,
Lp(O,
Lp(O,
Lp(O,
A
Lp(O,
A
Lp,. (O,b)},
(
-
182
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Table
f
Aj
Bj
10.1 Cj
Dj
1
Re(al - /h ) > O, Re(a2 -.82) >0, Tt2 • F, p(1 - Re a 1 } > 1, p(1 -Re a2) > 1 T2 1
Lp(O, b)
into Lp (O, b)
2
Tt2 • F
Lp(O, b)
{x-Ot /�+ 1/J, 1/J E Lp,.(O, b)}
T1 2 • T2 1
Lp(O, b)
{x -a 1�+ 1/J, 1/J E Lp,•(O, b)}
Tt2 • F
Lp(O, b)
into Lp (O, b)
Tt2 • F
Lp(O, b)
{x-Ot /�+ 1/J, 1/J E Lp,.(O, b)}
T1 2
{ x-Ot 1�+ 1/J' 1/JELp,.(O, b)}
Lp (O, b)
Re(at -.Bd > O, Re(a2 -.B2)>0, p[1+ Re(.B2 - a 1 - a2)] > 1, p(1 - Re a2 ) > 1 3 Re(at - .Bd > O, Re(a2 -.82) >0, p[1+Re(.Bt - a 1 - a2)]> 1, p[1 +Re(.B2 - a 1 - a2)]> 1 4 Re(at - .Bd < O, Re(a 2 - .82) >0, p(1 - Re at ) > 1, p(1 -Re a2) > 1, p(1 - Re .Bt } > 1, Re a > O 5 Re(al -.Bt ) < O, Re(a2 -.82) >0, p(1 - Re a2)> 1, p(1 -Re .Bt ) > 1, p[1 + Re(.B2 - a 1 - a2 )] > 1, Re a > O 6 Re(at - .Bd < O, Re(a2 -.B2) >0, p(1 + Re(a 1 - .81 - .82 )] > 1 , p(1 - Re .Bt } > 1, Re a < O 7 Re(al -.81 ) > 0, Re(a2 -.82) <0, p(1 - Re at } > 1, p(1 -Re .B2 ) > 1, Re a > O 8 Re(at - .Bd > O, Re(a2 -.82) <0, p(1 - Re a t } > 1, p(1 -Re .B2) > 1, Re a< O 9 Re(al -.81 ) < 0, Re(a2 -.82) <0, p[1 +Re(at - .Bt - .82 )] > 1 , p(1 - Re .Bt ) > 1 10 Re(al - .81 ) < 0, Re(a2 -.82) <0, p (1+Re(a t - .Bt - .B2 )] > 1 , p[1 +Re(a2 - .Bt - .B2)] > 1 11 p=1, a 1 =a2 =0, Re .B1 < O, Re .B2
Ej
(10.10), (10.12) (10.10) (10.12) (10.10) {10.10) -
{10.10) {10.12) {xa2-f32 Igf.- a2 1/J, {xf31 - 0t 1 Ig.f. -!31 x, {10.12)
/32 - 0/ 2 1/J , {xf31 - 0t 1 JaO+1 -f31 X ' T1 2 , F {xa 2 -fJ2 JO+ T2 1 xELp,. (o, b)} 1/; ELp, . (O, b)} Tt2 • T2 1 T12
1/J ELp,•(O, b)}
{x01 10; 1/;,
xELp,.(o, b)} Lp (O, b)
-
1/JELp,. (O, b)}
Tt2 • T2 1
{x01 10; 1/;, 1/J E Lp,.(O, b)}
Lp(O, b)
(10.12)
Tt2 • F, T2 1
L t ((O, b); ln2 x+1)
Lt (O, b)
( 10.10), {10.12)
the operator T2 1 maps onto {xf32 Ig.f. - 132 xf31 - 011 - 01 2Ig.;_ - f31 t/J(x), 1/J E Lp,. (O, b)} if p(1 - at ) > 1. The above ranges coincide with each other and with the space {x - 01/�+
1.5
the
183
§ 10. COMPOSITIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
and consider the second integral in ( 1 .43):
1
/ ( 1 - rr� - 1 2F1 (a 1 - f32, a2 - f32 ; a ; 1 - T- 1 )r- OI -f3t - 1 1P dr, 0
Re a > 0.
According to the relation
2F1 ( a,
b;
c;
z)
= O(z -a ) + O(z - b ) ,
a-
b :f 0, ± 1 , ±2, . . . , z --+
oo
{ 10. 13)
(Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi [1 , 2.10 (2)]), the last integral is convergent together with the integrals
1
1
J0 T-012 - 1 /P dr and J0 T-01 1 - 1 /P dr which are
also convergent when p(1 - a2) > 1 and p(1 - at) > 1 respectively. So in this case Theorem 1 .5 can be applied to the operator F and this operator is bounded in We apply the operator x01 1 /gf.-01 1 x-f31 , which is bounded in if p � 1 and p(1 {h ) > 1 - see (5.46'), to F and obtain the composition xa1 Igf.-011 z-/31 F bounded in By direct evaluation it is not difficult a1 to prove the relation x01 1 lgf. x-f31 F = xf32 Jgf_ - 132 x-012 f(x). Applying now the inverse operator xf3 1 Igf. -/31 z-01 1 to both sides of this result we finally arrive at (10.10) under the conditions in A4• Under stricter conditions, A5 , we can prove by using Lemma 10.1 as was done in the case j = 2, that the ranges onto which the operators T1 2 and F act can be represented in the form {x-01/g+ ,p, 1/J E Let now the conditions in A6 b e given an d f(x) = x01 10:1/J* (x), .,P* E We apply Lemma 10. 1 to the operators x011 -f31 -f32 J0+01 1/J* (x), Igf.-011 x011 -f31 -f32 when a > 0 and to the operator xf31 Igf. - {3 1 x-f3 1 when a = a 1 - {31 < 0, J..l = -{31 . As a result we obtain
Lp(O,b).
-
Lp (O,b)
Lp (O, b).
Lp,. (O,b)}. Lp ,. (O, b).
Lp (O, b) L . (O, b). Lp (O,b) p,
where 1/J 1 , 1/J 2 E and 1/Ji E This means that the operator T1 2 is bounded from C6 onto under the conditions in A6 • If the conditions in A1 or A8 are valid except the condition on a, then by Lemma 10.1 and the assumption p( 1 - {32) > 1 the function f(x) from C1 = C8 can be represented in the form f(x) = x012 Ig+-01 2 x-f32 cp where cp E Hence the fractional derivative cp(x) = xf32 Igf. - {32 x-01 2 f(x) exists and by p( 1 - at ) > 1 the
Lp (O,b).
184
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
operator T1 2 is defined and bounded on C1. Moreover according to Lemma 10.1 D 1 = Ds , and again Tt 2 / can be represented in the form Applying the bounded operator X012 Igf.- 012 x-fl2 to both sides of this relation we obtain the composition on the right-hand side in which the order can be interchanged in view of the corresponding assumptions concerning the type At: Applying the inverse operator xP2 I;+-tJ2 x - 012 to both sides of this relation we arrive at (10.12): Tt / = T f If addition Rea > 0, then Tt 2 and T21 remain bounded operators the2 values21 ·of which can be written as the right-hand side of (10.10), i. e . F/, after direct evaluations. In the case of the conditions in A9 the proof is similar to that in the case in Finally we prove (10.12) under the conditions in A1 0 , which are stricter than in Ag . We set Tt2 / = where E Lp (O, b). It follows from At o that p(1 - f3t ) > 1 and p(1 - fJ2) > 1. Therefore according to the analogue of At the relations in
g,
g
are valid. Applying the operators Tt2 and T2t to these relations we obtain = Tt 2 / and = T2t/ which yield (10.12). Remark 10.2. The conditions in Aj in Table 1 are sufficient. In some cases for p > 1 they can be extended when Re(aj - Pi ) = 0. This follows from remarks made after (5.46') about the boundedness of the corresponding fractional integrals of purely imaginary order. Now we consider the compositions of two right-sided fractional integro differentiation operators with b t= +oo. If we replace by 1/x , a by 1 - {J, {J by 1 - a and f(x) by f(x - ) then the operator xP 1;;fJ x-01 f(x) becomes xfl Ic:_ -tJ x - 01 f(x). This fact follows from the relation g
•
g
x
( 10.14)
Using the above substitutions and (10.11) from (10.10) and (10.12) we have the
§ 10. COMPOSITIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
185
relations
X
T- a� /(T)dT,
(10.15)
(z.Bt ]� • - .B• z - a • )(z.B� �� � - .B� z - a� )f(z) = (z.B� ��� - ,8� z - a� )(z.B• I�· - P• z - a • )/(z ).
(10.16)
Similarly -after- 1 replacing z by 1/z, t/J(z) by za- 1 ,P(1/z), /(z) by z - a- 1 /(1/z) and g(z) by z a g(1/z) we obtain the following result from Lemma 10.1. Lemma 10.2. Let t/J(z) E L,((a, oo ); zP - aP - 2 ), 0 < a < oo, 1 :5 p < oo, p(1 + Rep) > 1, and Rea "I 0. Then ,P(z) = l�z - IJ /(z), where f(z) E if and only if t/J(z) = z - IJ]�g(z) /�( a )* (L,((a, oo); zP+ cip - 2 )), 1.
signRea · a ,
To state an analogue of Theorem 10.1, in Table 1 we replace a by 1 - , by 1 - ai , z by 1/z, L,(O, b) by L,((a, oo); x- 2 ), 0 < a < oo, andi in columnPi E; (10.10) by (10.15) and (10.12) by (10.16). We denote by T12 , F and T2 1 the corresponding operators in (10.15) and (10.16). We call this rearranged Table by Table 10.1' but for brevity, it has not been printed. Then from Theorem 10.2 we obtain the corresponding result.
Pi
Let some of the conditions in A; from Table 10.1' be fulfilled. Then the operators B; are defined on the spaces Cj C L,((a, oo); z - 2 ), 1 :5 p < oo, and are bounded from Cj onto D; C L,((a, oo); z - 2 ) and the relations in E; from Table 1 0. 1' are fulfilled. The right-hand sides of (10.10) and (10.15) can be transformed by using the
Theorem 10.3.
relation (
(
2 F1 (a, b; c; z) = (1 - z) - •,F, a, c - b; c; z � 1
)
(10.17)
Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi [1,2.1.4(22)]). This leads to two results of such a kind. We set c = a + a - P - P and make the substitutions a = a 1 - P2 , b = a2 - P2 ,
186
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
a = a1 - fJ2 , b = a 1 - fJ1 ,
oo (r - xy- 1 ( . x ) . (10.20) 3 l_c (a, b)
z:
z:
1 I8+ (a, b)
c -b X c -b
= x 6 Ig; b xa- c I8+ xc - a -b
3I: (a , b)
= x a I� x -a 1:_- b
4 I: ( a, b)
(10.22) (10.23) (10.24) (10.25) (10.26) (10.27) (10.28) (10.29)
From (10.11), (10.17) and other simple properties of the Gauss function we are able to write the relations connecting the operators (10.18)-(10.21) with each other j Ic (a, b) = j Ic (b, a) = x < - t )i (a + b - c)j Ic ( c - a, c - b)x< - 1)i ( c- a -b) j=
1, 2, 3, 4 ;
(10.30)
§ 10. COMPOSITIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
187
{10.31) = y1 - c4-; Ic (a , b)
; I c ( a , b)
{10.32)
the indices 0+ and - being omitted for brevity, and the results for special cases of the above operators . JO+ c { a , C) - X ( - t )i a lcO+ X ( - t )i - 1 a ,
J
_
. J_c { a , c) - x ( - t )i a lc_ x ( - t )i -1 a ,
j = 1, 2,
( 10.33)
j = 3, 4. {10.34) After the above substitutions and transformations with the operators in {10.18) (10.21) from Theorems 10.2 and 10.3 we obtain the following result. Theorem 10.4. Let Re c > 0, 1 � p < oo, 0 < e < d < oo and some of the 1
_
conditions in A; from Table 10.2 be fulfilled. Then the corresponding operator B; is defined on the space C; and is bounded from C; onto D; and the relations in E; from Table 10.2 are fulfilled.
Proof. We consider the case j = 1 in Table 10.2. We represent the right-hand side of {10.22) in the form xc(x- c1g;6x6)(x-a-b I8+ x4)
188
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Table 10.2 f
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Aj
Re b > O, p(1 + Re a) > 1 Re b < O, p(1 + Re b) > 1 p[1 + Re(a + b)] > 1 Re(c - b) > O, p(1 + Re b) > 1, p[1 + Re(a + b - c)] > 1 Re(b - c) > O, p(1 + Re a) > 1 Re(c - b) > O, p(1 - Re a) > 1 , Re(b - c) > O, p[1 +Re(c - a - b)] > 1, p [1 + Re(c- b)] > 1 Re b >O, p(1 - Re b) > 1 , p[1 + Re(c - a - b)] > 1 Re b < O, p[1 +Re(c- a)] > 1 Re(c - b) > O, p(1 - Re a) > 1 Re(b - c) > O, p[1 +Re(c- b)] > 1, p[1 + Re(c- a - b)) > 1 Re b > O, p(1 - Re b) > 1 , p [1 + Re(c- a - b)) > 1 Re b
Re(c - b) > O, p(1 + Re b) > 1, p[1 + Re(a + b - c)) > 1
14
Re(b - c) > O, p(1 +Re a) > 1
15
Re b > O , p(1 + Re a) > 1
16
Re b < O, p(1 + Re b) > 1 p[1 + Re(b+a)] > 1
Bj
DJ·
Cj
Lp (O, d) { xb /0;1/1, 1/0+ ( a , b) 1/IELp,. (o, d) } b) a ( Lp(O, d) , 1/0+ 1/0+ (a , b) {Xc -b 1Ob-+c 1/l) ' 1/IELp,.(O, d } b) Lp(O, d) (a, + �O { 2/0+ (a , b) Xc -b 1Ob-+c 1/l ' 1/IELp,.(O, d) } 2/0+ (a, b) Lp,.(o, d) 2/0+ ( a , b) {xb 1(); 1/1, 1/IE Lp,.(O, d) } l oo ) : Lp , •((e, a !: (a, b) xPc+p- 2 ) {x-c ��- c 1/l, ;/!: (a, b) ((e, oo ) ; 1/IELp,. xP{ 1 + b- c) -2 ) } oo ) ; Lp,•((e, ai!: (a, b) xPc+p-2 ) {x-c i:b 1/l, 3J!: (a, b) ((e, oo ) ; 1/IELp,. xp-pb-2 ) } Lp,.((e, oo2 ) ; i!: (a, b) xPc+p- ) {x-C ]�-c 1/l, i!: (a, b) oo ) ; 1/IELp,•((e, xP{ 1 + b-c) -2 ) } i:( a, b) oo ) ; Lp,.((e, xPc+p- 2 ) {x-C J:b 1/J, i!: (a, b) oo ) ; 1/IELp,•((e, xp-pb-2 ) }
J0+ (Lp,.(o, d)) {xb 1Oc+-b x ' xELp,.(O, d) } /0+ (Lp, . (O, d)) {xc-b ]�+ X' xELp,.(o, d) } /0+ (Lp,• (0, d)) {xc -b ]�+ X' xELp,.(o, d) } I0+ (Lp,.(o, d)) {Xb 1Oc+-b x, xELp,. (o, d) } I!:(Lp,•((e, oo) : xPc+p- 2 )) I�(Lp,•((e, oo ) : :z;P +pb-2 ))
1 /0+ (a, b)
Ej
(10.22) (10.22) (10.23) (10.23) (10.24) (10.24) (10.25) (10.25) (10.26) (10.26)
I!:(Lp,•((e, oo ) : (10.27) :z;P +p c - 2 )) 1:-b (Lp,• ( (e, oo ) : (10.27) xP{ 1 + c -b ) -2 ))
I:(Lp,.((e, oo ) : (10.28) xPc+p-2 )) I�(Lp,•((e, oo ) : (10.28) :z;P b+p- 2 ))
I:(Lp,.((e, oo) : (10.29) :z;PC+p - 2 )) -b 1: (Lp,•((e, oo ) : (10.29) xP{ 1+c-b) -2 ))
Remark 10.3 follows from the possibility of defining the integrand by zero from (e, d) to (O,oo), and from the boundedness in Lp ( e, d) of the operator of multiplication by the power function x'Y with arbitrary On the basis of this, the conditions in A including p and connected with the influence of the weight x'Y at zero and infinityi can be excluded. In conclusion of this subsection we note that Remark 10.2 can be transferred to Theorems 10.3 and 10.4. 'Y ·
§ 10. COMPOSITIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
10.2.
189
Compositions of two-sided integrals with power weights
We now- find the conditions of commutability for two operators z/31 I;.f.-/31 z-a1 and z/32 /�2 /32 z -a2 with power weights, and obtain some important representations of such compositions. For this we use a slightly different approach to the above operators. If we apply the inverse Mellin transform-a given in (1.113) to (7.17) and (7.21) and then replace a by a - {3, /(z) by z /(z) and s by s + {3 we obtain the representations +
_
"'Y+ i oo
f (1 - a - s) f"' ( s )z -• ds, j 2'11'" i"'Y-ioo f(1 - {3 - s)
1 8 P ) :r 1Oa- z -a /( z -
( 10.35)
Re(a + s) < 1 ,
1 zf3 Ja - {J z -a !( z ) = _. _
2 1r1
"'Y+ ioo
J "'Y-ioo
r ({3 + s) /"' ( s) z -· ds, a + s)
r(
(10.36)
Re ({j + s) > 0,
where /"'(s) is the Mellin transform of /(z) in (1.112). These relations are also valid for any a - {3 for a sufficiently good function /(z). Details of this may be seen in the beginning of § 36. If we construct the composition of the left-hand sides of (10.35) and (10.36) with different indices and use the Parseval relation for Mellin transform given (10.116) we arrive at the relation as
in
(10.37) -Ref32 < Res <
1 - Rea1 .
Since the gamma-multipliers of the integrand in (10.37) can be interchanged with each other then the operators in the left-hand sides of (10.37) commute for the corresponding functions. Sufficient conditions for such commutability and for the boundedness of the above operators are given by the following statement. Theorem 10.5.
Let Re (a1 - {31) >
0, Re(a2 - {32)
>
0, p(1 - Rea l )
>
1,
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
190
pRe/32 > -1 and f(z) E Lp(O, oo) , 1 :5 p <
oo.
Then the relations
( zlll 1;.;. -111 z- a 1 )( zll2 1�2 -112 z- a 2 )f(z ) = ( zfl2 J�2-P2z -a2 )( zP1 �� -P � z-al )f( z) =
j00 ( T) f(t) �t , ko
0
(10.38)
ko ( y )
2
1 (1 + fJ2 - n 1 , 1 + fJ2 - n2 ; 1 + /J2 - Pt ; y), r(1 + /32 - a t )ya. - t ko ( Y) = r(nt - {3t )r(1 + n2 - a t ) x F
Y
< 1,
are valid and all operators in (10.38) are bounded in Lp(O, oo) .
The boundedness of the above operators in Lp(O, oo) follows from the relations in (5.45') and (5.46') applied by one or another order in succession under the assumptions of theorem. The coincidence of the compositions in (10.38) with each other follows from ( 10.37) and their representation via the right-hand side of (10.38) is proved by the direct evaluation of these compositions, or of the integral in (10.37). This is carried out by using the theory of residues or by Slater's theorem. (Marichev [10, Theorem 17].) We now indicate the important cases of such compositions. A. Let in (10.37) n 1 1 - 2a, n 2 c - 2a, Pt 1 - c, fJ2 = 0. By using 12.24(1) in Marichev [10, Section 10] and the Parseval relation in (1.116) we obtain the following compositional expansion via commutative operators Proof.
•
=
=
100 t 2a-l20 2 F1 (a, a + 21 ; c; 0
(z + t)
=
)
4xt f(t)dt (x + t) 2 (10.39)
Re(c - 2a) > 0, 2pRea > 1, f(x) E Lp(O, oo) , 1 :5 p < oo.
B. Let in (10.37) n1
=
n, n2 = /J1 = n/2, P2 = 0.
Then similarly by using
§ 10. COMPOSITIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
191
1.5(1) in Marichev (10, Section 10] we have
; (x"l 2 r.�2 x-a )(I�/ 2 x - af2 )f(x), p(1 - Re a) > 1, f(x) E Lp(O, oo), 1 5 p < oo.
j lz ���t-a /(t)dt 00
0
Re a >
0,
=
2f(a) cos
"'
( 10.40)
The details concerning these operators may be found in § 12.3, in particular, compare (10.40) with (12.39). C. Let in (10.37) a = = 0, a = f3t = 1/2. Then similarly by using 2.4(1) in Marichev (10, Section 10] we find the expansions:
1 fJ2
2
x112 r;;12 1:'2 x- 112 f(x) (Sf)(x), 1:'2 1;;12 f(x) (Sf)(x),
(10.41)
=
=
( S/)(x)
where is the singular integral given in (11.1) with a = 0 and b = oo. D. Let in (10.37) a = = -a, a = f3t = 0 or a = = 0, a = f3t = a. Then the gamma-functions of the integrand in (10.37) are transformed to i the functions ai:(:��),..· = cos a1r + sin a1r ctg (s - a)1r and s n.\��:>• = cos a1r + sin a1r ctg s1r, respectively. According to (10.41) the operators cos a1rE + sin a1r and cos a1r E+sin a1rS, where E is the identity operator, correspond to the above functions. Making the changes =
x- asx a
1 fJ2
1 fJ2
2
2
10.: f
f
10.3. Compositions of several integrals with power weights
zl3; 1;�- l3; x-a;
We construct the composition of the type (10.37) of three operators or j = 1, 2, 3, and choose the parameters aj , /Jj such that all gamma-functions of the integrand in {10.37) will be cancelled. Then on the basis of (1.113) we obtain the following relations
zl3; 1�; - l3; x-a;,
IJ+ xa 1C+x"'' 10+ x13 f(x) f(x), 1'!_xa 1�x"'' 1�x13 f(x) /(x), =
=
fJ
( 10.42) ( 10.43)
where a + + 'Y = 0. It is obvious that if we exclude 'Y in these relations then we shall arrive at (10.6) and (10.7) equivalent to them. Our results are given by Theorem 10.6 and Table 10.3.
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
192
a
Theorem 10.6. Let and P be complex numbers such that the function P) is defined, see Then and are fulfilled when + f(x) = xu I� a , a fJ ) x" ,P(x), where .,P (x) E Lp(O, b), b $ and and are fulfilled when f(x) = xu I'� ( a, a +fJ ) x" ,P (x) , where a IRePI , P) l] - 1 . The ,P(x) E Lp(a, oo) ,
m(a, a + (10.7}
(10.1).
(10.6}
(10.42} 0 < < oo, 1 p < oo , (10.48} 0 < < oo, 1 < p < [max(IRe al, IRe(a + parameters and v are given in Table 10.3. If the function m( a, a + (J) is not defined then the above statements are also valid under the additional assumptions on f(x) obtained from Remark 10.1 after replacing by x -1 and f(x) by x - a - {3 - 1 f(x - 1 ) . Table 10. 3 Condition Value 12 435 6 u
x
Rea Re,B Re a Re,B Re a Re a
> < < > > <
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
Re,B > 0 Re (a + ,8) Re (a + ,8) Re (a + .B) Re (a + .B) Re ,B < 0
>0 >0
u=v=O u = -,8, v = 0 u = -,8, v = a + ,8 u = -,8, v = 0 u = 0, v = a u=v=O
Proof. Let Rea > 0, ReP > 0 and f E Lp (O, b). Then the condition p{1 + Re P) > p � 1 and the inequality in (5.46') yield so(x) = xa-/3 I�+ x/3 f( x) E Lp(O, b). Hence the composition on the left-hand side of (10. 6 ) exists in Lp(O, b). The right-hand side of {10.6) also exists in Lp (O, b) under the conditions of the theorem. We verify {10.6} on the set of sufficiently "good" functions dense in p {O, b) and then can extend it to the whole space Lp (O, b) by using Theorem 1. 7 . In the case of right-sided operator the condition pRe (a + P) < 1 follows from {5.46' ) instead of the condition p{1 + ReP) > 1, which is fulfilled automatically. The other five cases are reduced to the first case by using the statement for the first case but relative to the corresponding analogue of (10.6): L
x 01 +f3 I;f x - 01 I�J13 x - 13 (xf3 f(x)) = I�+ (x13 f(x)) , 01+ 13 x - 13 l -01 x01+f3 •1· 13 •1• x - 01 1O+ - 1O+ 'f' (x) ' 'f' (x) O+
f3 .. t, ( X ) , -a 'f' X13 [-a-/3 'f' ( X ) - 1O+ O+ X a1O+ X - a -/3 .t.
( 10.44)
_
-/3 ..'f't. ( X ) , X -a-f3 1a 'f' ( X ) - 1O+ O+ X13 [O+a- /3 X a .t. _
{3 - Ot ,.J, ( - 1 -a- {3 "'' - 0t X a+f3 [X - {3 1O+ O+ 'f' ( X ) O+ X 'f' X ) -
•
Here the functions ,P (x) are connected with f(x) by means of the relations indicated in the conditions of the theorem and in Table In reality for example, the two first relations in can be obtained from by applying the operator
{10.44)
10.3. (10.6)
§ 10. COMPOSITIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
193
za +P I0fx - a to (10.6) and by the substitution ,P( x ) = x- a- fJ IC+ xP f(x) and these
relations are altered from (10.6) by replacing {J by -{J, a by a + {J and I by zP I and {J by a + {J, a by -a and I by ,P, respectively. After we have written the corresponding condition 1 in Table 10.3 for the above relations and made the inverse passage to (10.6) we shall arrive at conditions 2 and 3 in Table 10.3. In the case of the right-sided operators similar statements obtained from (10.44) by replacing the index 0+ by - are valid also. The six conditions obtained above can be united into the conditions given in Theorem 10.6, by using (10.1). The last statement of the theorem follows from Theorem 10.1, Remark 10.1 and the above substitutions connecting (10.4), (10.5) with (10.7) and (10.6). In the case Re(a + {J + 'Y ) > 0 the compositions on the left-hand sides of (10.42) and (10.43) can be written via integral operators involving the Gorn function
y
F3(a, a , b, b ; c ; x , ) = 1
1
� LJ
(a) �; (b) �; (a1 ) t (b1 )t x A: 1 0 y, ( C) A:+ l k'l' A:,l:O •
•
< x, y < 1.
(10.45)
. ( Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi [1, 5.7.1.(8)]), in the kernel. Indeed, the composition of two fractional integrals, for example, of the type (10.22) leads to the operator given in (10.18). Applying one _more fractional integral with power weight to the above operator we obtain the following representation for the composition of three fractional integrals of the form (10.42):
)
_ z cp( T)dT Jz tp (x - t)a- 1 (t - T)c- 1 2F1 (a, b,. c,. 1 - t dt - J r(a)r(c) ; .,.
0
=
xP
z (x T)a+c- 1 Fs (a, a, b, -{J; a + c; 1 - xjT, 1 - Tjx)cp(T)dT, J r(a + c) _
0
Re(a + c) > 0.
(10.46)
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
194
During the above evaluations we assumed Rea > 0, Re/3 > 0 and applied Fubini's theorem, the substitution t = z - q(z - r) and the expansion of the inner integral in hypergeometric series by using (1.72). All these evaluations are correct and lead to the right-hand side of (10.46) under the conditions of convergence of the corresponding series. After that these conditions can be weakened or even removed by using the principal of analytic continuations of the relations if we denote by F3 not only the double series in (10.45) but its analytic continuation beyond the domain 0 < z, y < 1 . By the same method the condition Rea > 0 can be weakened till the condition Re (a + c) > 0. • If we replace a by a', {J by -b' and a + c by c in (10.46) and take (10.22) and (10.35) into account we obtain the following analogue of (10.37):
ioo
:z: f (z - r)c- 1 (a, a', b,b'; c; 1 - :;:-z , 1 - ;T)
0
F3
-yf+ r(1 + a - c - s)r(1 + b - c - s)r(1 - a' - b' - s) 1 -21ri-y-ioo r(1 + a + b - c - s)r(1 - a' - s)f(l - b' - s)
Res < 1 + Re(a - c), 1 + Re(b - c), 1 - Re(a' + b').
(10.47)
According to (10.35) each pair of the gamma-functions, one function in the numerator and one in the denominator, corresponds to a single fractional integral with power weights. Hence, six gamma-functions in (10.47) correspond to six variants of compositions of three such fractional integrals, and integrals in each composition can be arranged in different order using six ways. If we also take into account that each such an arrangement corresponds to six variants of conditions connected with different variants of signs of the orders of these integrals, then it is obvious that writing all variants of compositional expansions for the operator given in (10.47) and the conditions such as in Table 10.2 is not convenient. By analogy with (10.37) the compositions of any numbers of the fractional operators in (10.35) and (10.36) lead us to the relation
mII (z.B; 1;�-,8; z - a; ) IIn (z6'" 1�'" - 6'" z -"Y,. )/(z ) k= l i=l
) f(t ) dt ' -- f �,mm+n,m+n ( :_l(a),.,(-y)" ( ( t t 6 ) ., ,8) ,. 00
0
(10.48)
195
§ 10. COMPOSITIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
involving the Meijer G-function given in (1.95). The necess ary condition for the second relation in the condition Re
c�,{"'; -
P; )
(10.48)
to be fulfilled is
+ .�1(7• - 6•)) > 0 - see Theorem 36.3 and the
inequality in (36.21). Sufficient conditions for the operators in the parentheses on the left-hand side of (10.48) to be commutative is given by the following statement.
. . . ,m,
Let f(x) E Lp(O, oo) , p(1 - Reaj ) > 1, j = 1 , 2, Theorem 10.7. pRe6k > -1, k = 1, 2, . . . , n, and p � 1, Re (aj - /3j ) > 0, Re (i'k - 6k) > 0 or p > 1, Re (aj - /3j ) � 0, Re (i'k - 6k) � 0. Then the operators in the left-hand side
c�,
-
- )
(a; P; ) + .� ( 1• 6•) > 0, then of (10.48} commute. If additionally Re , the left and the right-hand sides of (10.48), without the middle, are bounded from Lp (O, oo ) to Lp(O, oo) and coincide with each other. The proof follows from the boundedness of the left-hand side of (10.48) in
Lp (O, oo) which is valid under the conditions of the theorem. Here the arguments are the same as those in the case j = 1 when proving Theorem 10.2 , but with taking into account the remark after the relation in (5.46'). • As in the cases of Theorems 10.1 and 10.2 the conditions in Theorem 10.7 may be weakened and extended to negative Re (aj - /3j ) or Re(i'k - 6k ) , and the space Lp(O, oo) can be contracted to the corresponding space of functions represented by fractional integrals of other functions in Lp(O, oo) . In conclusion of this subsection we note that commutability is valid for the products of more general operators of the form x kfJ 1;;;! ,. x - l: a and xmfJ IC:.. ;'!.. x- ma under the appropriate conditions (see § 18.2).
10.4. Compositions with exponential and power-exponential weights We first consider compositions of two left-sided integrals with exponential weights. The following statement is true.
Let 1/J(x) E Lp (O, 6), 0 < b < oo, 1 � p < oo, and Rea I 0. Then the representation 1/J(x) = e�z 1g+ e - �z f(x) , f(x) E I�a) (Lp (O, b)), takes place if and only if .,P(x) E � - a)(Lp (O, b)).
Lemma 10.3.
Proof. In the case Re a > 0 the lemma directly follows from Lemma 31.4 since according to this lemma the operator e�z 1�+ e - �z , Rea > 0, is bounded from Lp(O, b), 0 b oo, 1 � p oo, onto I�+ (Lp (O, b)). The case Re a 0 is considered in the same way as it was carried out in Lemma 10.1. • According to Lemma 10.3 we are able to obtain the following result which is an analogue of Theorem 10.1.
< <
<
<
196
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Theorem 10.8. Let a and {J m ( a, {J, a + {J) is defined. Then the
be complex numbers such that the function operators Ig+ and eAz 1g+ e - Az commute in the + a a space I� ,fJ , fJ ) (Lp(O, b)), 0 < b < oo, 1 � p < oo, i.e. the relation (10.49) is valid. If Re ( a + {J) > 0,
Re{J f; 0,
and f(x ) E J�fJ ){Lp (O, b)) then {10.50)
If Re (a + {J) >
0, Re a f; 0, and f(x ) E J�( a)(Lp(O, b)) then {10.51)
When Re (a + {J) > 0 the operators in above spaces onto 1;:fJ (Lp(O, b)).
{10. 50}
and {10. 51) are bounded from the
Proof. I t is sufficient t o prove {10.49)-{10.51) in the space L 1 {0, b).
By Fubini's theorem we make some evaluations and use the integral representation 6.5(1) in the hand-book by Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi [1]. As a result we have
=
z (x - r)a+ - 1 fJ
J 0
f( a
Re a >
0,
F ({3; a + {3; A(x - r)) f( r)dr, + {J) 1 1 Re{J >
0.
(10.52)
Now if we apply 6.3(7) from the above handbook and use the relation in {10.52) but in inverse order then we arrive at (10.51). The relation in (10.49) follows from {10.50) and {10.51) in the case Re a > 0 and Re {J > 0. The last conditions can be
197
§ 10. COMPOSITIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
weakened by replacing them with the conditions in Theorem 10.8 which guarantee the convergence of all integrals in (10.49)-(10.51 ). • We note that (10.49) enables us to obtain the composition of any numbers of the operators I;+e±Ax with alternative signs for AX via the composition of only two such operators. For example, the relations
(10.53) ( 10.54) By analogy with
(10.18)-(10.21) we introduce the operators (10.55)
j (r ;�� 00
(I:··�f)(x) =
e-
X
Rec >
t
1 F1 (a ; c ; .\(r - x))f(r)dr,
( 10.56)
0, Re A > 0.
It is obvious that c , a , O - 1O+ c , O , A - 1O+ c ' IO+ _
From (10.50) and obtain the relations
(10.51)
_
c , c , A e Ax lO+ 1O+ e e - Ax ' _
after the substitutions f3 =
a
( 10.57) and a + f3 =
c
we
(I�� , A f)(x) = I�+ a e).x Ig+ e - Ax f(x),
( 10.58)
( I�� , A f)(x) = eAx Ig+ e - Ax I�+ a f(x) .
(10.59)
(I: a , A f)(x) = r:_-a e).x I� e - A X f(x) ,
( 10.60) (10.61)
The relations
(I: a , A f)(x) = eAx I� e - Ax !:_-a f(x)
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
198
are proved similarly. To investigate the operators in ( 10.58) -( 10.61 ) we need the following result which follows from Theorems 18.2 and 18.3.
Let ReA > 0, Rea > 0, 1 � p < (Rea) - 1 . Then the operator e>.x p�_ e - >.x f(x) is bounded from Lp(a, oo), O < a < oo, onto l� (Lp(a, oo)).
Lemma 10.4.
( 10.58 )-( 10.61 ) are valid under the conditions given in the following statement which can be easily verified.
Let Re c > 0 and let some of the conditions in Aj from Table 10.4 be fulfilled. Then the operators Bj are defined on the spaces Cj C Lp (O, b), 0 < b < oo, 1 � p < oo, and are bounded from Cj onto Dj and the relations in Ej are fulfilled.
Theorem 10.9.
Table 10.4 Aj
j 1
Re a > 0
2
Re a < 0
3
Re (c - a) > 0
4
Re (c - a) < O
5
Re a > 0, Re -X > 0, p max(Re a, Re c) < 1 Re a < O, Re -X > 0, pRe (c - a) < 1 Re (c - a) > O, Re .\ > 0, p max(Re c, Re (c - a)) < 1 Re (c - a) < O, Re .\ > 0, pRe a < 1
6 7 8
Bj c, 1O+a ,JI. c, a , >. 1O+ c, 1O+a , >. c, , a >. 1O+ 1�a , >.
1�a , >. 1�a , >. 1� a , >.
Ci
Lp (O, b)
10_; (Lp (O, b))
p
L (O, b)
1g_; c (Lp (O, b)) Lp (a, oo )
Dj
18+ (Lp (0, b)) 1g+ a (Lp (O, b)} 18+ (Lp (0, b)) 13+ (Lp (0, b)) 1:_ (Lp (a, oo ))
Ej (10.58) (10.58) (10.59) (10.59) (10.60)
{e>.x 1:ae->.x1/J, 1/J E Lp(a, oo)}
1:_- a (Lp (a , oo ))
(10.60)
Lp (a, oo )
1:. (Lp (a, oo))
(10.61 )
1�- c (Lp (a, oo ))
{e>.x 1�e->.x1/J, 1/J E Lp (a, oo ) }
(10.61 )
Compositions of many-sided fractional integrals with exponential weights leads us, in general, to integral operators of highly cumbersome form except in some special cases. One of these cases is considered here. Using 2.3.6.10 in the handbook by Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev [ 1] we evaluate the following composition:
l'!: e - >• If:+ f(x) =
=
j �;{�; j(t - x)0- 1 (t - r)a- ! e -"dt X
00
0
X
oo l x - r l a- 1 f 2 e - >.(x+T)/ 2 Ka ( 2A 1 x - r l) f(r)dr, - 1 /2 y7rr(a) J A 1/2- a
0
Rea > 0,
( 10.62 )
199
§ 1 1 . FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND THE SINGULAR OPERATOR
where I<11 (z) is the Macdonald function given in ( 1 .85) . For the operator in ( 10.62) the corresponding analogue of Theorem 10.9 can be obviously proved but the property of (10.43)-type is wrong. The composition of two one-sided fractional integrals with power-exponential weights leads us to the relation
=
x (x - t)a+{j - 1 � (,8, 6; a + ,8; 1 - x , ,\(x - t) f(t)dt , t J f(a + ,B) 1 ) 0
( 10.63)
where � 1 is one of the Humbert functions: � 1 (,8 , 6 ,· -v· , x , y)
=
� L.....J
(/3) i + k ( 6 )i i k• l l . + "l. k l z y , x < 1 ( ) k j, k :O "'f J } .
( 10.64)
Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi [1, 5.7. 1(20)] with a correction of the misprint in the index in the numerator, ( (,B) m instead of (,B)n ) . The relation in (10.63) is proved by the same way as (10.50) .
§ 1 1 . Connection between Fractional Integrals and t he Singular Operator In this section we discuss the connection between the fractional integration operators and the singular integral operator. It is shown how a left-hand sided fractional integration is expressed via a right-hand sided one (and vice versa) in terms of the singular operator. We first give the necessary preliminary information concerning the singular operator.
1 1 . 1 . The singular operator As before let
f2
= [a, b] ,
-oo
�a<
(S cp)(x)
=
S
b � oo. We consider the singular integral
.!_ 1r
b
j a
cp (t)dt , t-X
x E (a , b),
( 1 1 . 1)
the convergence being understood in the principal value sense. One may become acquainted with the theory of such integrals and with the proofs of Theorems 1 1 . 1-1 1 .3 given below in the books of Gahov [1] , Muskhelishvili [1] and Gohberg and Krupnik [4]. Here we give the properties of the operator S , which we shall
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
200
p rtan
repeatedly use in the future. An im o t property of the operator S is its boundedness in the spaces H�(p) and Lp (p) . Let p(z) be the weight or = and z 1 = a, Zn b in the case when a and b are the finite points.
If mes O < oo, 0 < .\ < 1, then in the space HS and in the space HS(p), p(z ) = .\ < J.lk < .\ + 1 ( k = I, . . . , n) .
Theorem 11.1.
(1.7) (1.9),
the n operator S
is
bounded n lz - Zk ii'J. ' Zk E 0, if k =l
If mes O = oo , 0 n< .\ < 1, then the operator S is bounded in the space H� (p), p(z) = (1 + z2 )�'' 2 n l z - Zk I�'" ' Zk E 0, if ,\ < J.lk < ,\ + 1 (k = k =l n I , . . . , n ) and -.\ < p + L: J.lk < 1 - .\.
Theorem 11.2.
k =l
The operator S is bounded in the space Lp (p) 1 < p < oo , n p(z) = ( I + z 2 )�'' 2 n lz - Zk l�'" , Zk E 0, if -1 < Jl.k < p - 1 (k = 1, . . . , n) and if Theorem 11.3.
,
k =l
n
{in the case mes O = oo) -1 < p + L: Jl.k < p - 1. k
the explicit=lvalue of the norm of the operator S in the space Lp(R1) is known namely In the case 0 = R1
(11.1') IISII = tg [1r/2 min(p, p')] . see S.K. Pichorides [1]. The equation s- t = -S is also known to hold when 1 0 = R , and therefore
(11.2 ) and the Fourier transform of the singular integral S
a
x
b (�) { Ja b - t t -
201
§ 11. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS ANDafJ'HE SINGULAR OPERATOR
.!_ 1r
I'
_..!!!._ Z
=
[ - I �=: I I'] ' 1 _7r [ 1 (�) sm_ b-� IJ] ' IJ
sin11J7r 1 .
_ COS IL1f' r
(b-ab)"-�+v-l
if if
z < a or z > b, a < z < b ( 1 1 .5)
( . + v,. bb-�a ) z
(- 1
< ReJl < 1) ; if
a
B(Jl,
1 6
v) 2
1 1, Jl, Jl or z > b;
,
F
x) �' - 1 1rctgJl1r 1 ' ll F1 2 Jl X B( Jl 1 .' 2 - Jl, if a < z < b ( Jl > > 0)
( 1 1 .6)
Re 0, Rev
are valid - see Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev [1; 2.2.6.5-8] and Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi [2, 15.2(33)]. We note that if z (/. (a, b), the integrals (11.4)-( 1 1 .6) are evaluated by a simple change of variable. Thus, for example, if z < a, the change of variable s = �!-=.:*::::� transforms ( 1 1 .4) to the beta-function and the same change of variable yields (11.6) if x > b according to (1 .73). If a < z < b, the required equalities can be obtained by means of the Sokhotskii formula, known in the theory of singular integrals - see Gahov [1, p.38] . The following results
b dt Ja (t - a)� (b - t)� It - Yl1-a(t (y - z) - (z - a)af 2 (b - z)a/ 2 1 z - y p-a ' b y)dt Ja (t - a) (b - t) t - yl -a(t - ) x)
1rctg ¥-sign
_
�
�
sign (t -
!±2.
�
-
-
( 1 1 .7)
1
1
x
?rtg f!!:. 2
( 1 1 .8)
� ( b - z) !±2. � lz - y 1 1 -a ' (z - a ) !±2.
where a < z < b, a < y < b, 0 < a < 1, are also valid - see Gahov [1, p.530-531]. Finally, we note the formula for interchanging singular integrals
b � !b tp(y, t)dt - - 2 ( ) + b dt b tp(y, t)dy Ja Ja (y - z )( t - y) Ja y - z a t - y \
-
named
1r
IF
x, X
the Poincare-Bertrand formula - see Gahov [1 , p.63].
,
( 1 1 .9)
CHAPTER
202
3.
PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
1 1 . 2 . The case of the whole line
The relations connecting the fractional integrals If.r.p and I�
I�
(11.10) (11.11) ( 11.12)
Proof. First let
- !7r J t - f(c:r) J (tr.p(r)dr - rp-a . oo oo Here we can interchange the order of integration. Such an operation is known to be valid in the case when one of the integrals is singular - see Gahov [1] and Muskhelishvili [1]. Therefore, we have 00
srx
+
_:!!_ _1_
t
X
SI'i-
00
z
T
00
dt J (t - r)l-a(t - x) T
.
J r -sax-1(1+ s(1- s)+-ax -dsr) 1
sin7ra7r ( T - x) a- 1 - { -7rctgc:r7r(x - r)a- 1 x 0
>
X <
I
1
T, T1
§ 1 1 . FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND THE SINGULAR OPERATOR
according to (11.4). Therefore, we find
Sl+a = '�'
1 sin norf(n)
[00 !
_l z
203
]
cp( r)dr , z ( - T ) l -a
which yields (11.1 0) for
The coincidence of the images
is valid (see (6.1)). The space Ia ( Lp ) is invariant relative to the operator S.
Indeed, the equation I±
If a > 0 and (3 > 0, then the relation
is valid, E being the identity operator. Corollary 3.
The Marchaud derivatives Di.J and Dr: / are related by the equation (11.11')
To obtain ( 1 1 . 1 1') it is sufficient to designate I�
204
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Corollary 4.
For any 0 < a < 1 and 1 < p < 1/a the inequality { 1 1 . 1 1")
is true where A = j cos a?rj + sin a?r tg (?r/2 min(p, p')] .
Indeed, this estimate follows from {11 .11') and { 1 1 . 1').
Remark 11.1.
Relations { 1 1 . 10 ) -{1 1 . 12) are true for
n { 1 + x 2 ) J' / 2 n l x - x �c l#lk ' k
p
n
+ L:
k=l
=l
Jl k
Xk
E R1 ' if -1 < Jlk
r.p(x) E Lp (p), p(x)
< p - 1 ( k = 1 , . . . ' n ) , ap - 1
= <
< p - 1 , p > 1. This follows from the Hardy-Littlewood-type Theorem
5.5 and from Theorem 1 1 .3 according to the Banach theorem 1 .7. formula for differentiation of the singular integral, { Sj) (n ) = S { f( n ) ) , is known. It is also valid for the case of fractional differentiation, thus
Remark 11.2. In the theory of singular integrals (Gahov (1 , p.43] ) a simple
D± (Sf) = S(D± f), f E Ia (Lp ), 1 < p < 1/a,
{ 1 1 . 13)
which is a paraphrase of the commutation property { 1 1 . 12 ) .
1 1 .3. The case of an interval and a half-axis Now let us find out how the fractional integrals 1:+
-nVaa+ Iba-
_
-
sin a1r d -- 1r dx
dt Ia (x - t )a It (T t )a- 1
b
b
_
min(x,T)
I r.p(T)dT I a
a
(x - t) -a (T - t) a-l dt.
§ 1 1. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND THE SINGULAR OPERATOR
We introduce the function
jz
6
+
+e
a
and set T
j
K 1 (z, r) � (z - t) - a ( T - t) 0- 1 dt a
.!..:..!. :r: - f'
=
j s0- 1 (1 + s)-0 ds,
T < z,
0
z � (z - t) -0 (r - t)0- 1 dt K: 2 (z, r)
j a
£:.!.. f' - :r:
=
j s- a ( l + s)0- 1 ds,
T > z,
0
Then we have
Je (z) =
sin a1r [ -K: 1 (z, z - c)cp(z - c) - K:2 (z, z + c)cp(z + c) 11'
Hence we obtain lim Je (z) = v:+ Ib'_ cp = e-O
sin a1r { 11'
J 6
a
( �) a cp(rT -)dr Z - a
Z
+ limo cp(z)[K: 1 (z, z - c ) - K: 2 (z, z + c)] } .
e-
205
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
206
Evaluating the limit we find
= elimo { =
J
00
0
"j [sa- l (l
�
+ s) - a - s -a ( I + s) a- l ]ds -
j"
�
s - a (1 + s) a- t]ds }
0
[ sa- t a (1 + s)
(1 + s) a - 1
sa
] ds
= 1rctga1r by 2.2. 12.3 from Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev (1] . Therefore we have
b - a ) a --sin n1r cp( r) dr -n"a+ a 1ba- IP = COS 0'7rcp( X ) + -- (T-r-x 71" J x - a a
( 1 1 . 14)
and the relation sought for is obtained. Now knowing the explicit form of the relation, it is easy to give its rigorous justification. It will be given for the functions cp E Lp . We shall obtain other relations by the way. Theorem 11.5.
Let 0 < a < 1 and ra (x ) = x - a, rb (x) = b - x.
( 1 1 . 15)
Then the fractional integrals I�+ cp, Ib-
cp E Lp, cp E Lp , cp E Lp , cp E Lp,
p > 1, p > 1, p � 1, p � 1,
( 11 . 16) ( 1 1 . 17) ( 1 1 . 18) ( 11 . 19)
which hold almost everywhere if pa $ 1 and for each x E ( a , b), if pa > 1 . First let cp E C0 . (11.16) follows from ( 1 1 . 14) since 1:+ v�+ f = f. This can also be checked by direct interchanging the order of integration in the
Proof.
§ 1 1 . FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND THE SINGULAR OPERATOR
207
right-hand side of ( 1 1 .16) . As for ( 1 1 . 18) , we prove it by direct verification, thus
b b (t - r) a- 1 (b - t) -a t a s _!_ Ia lp - (b - x) a
J
T
T
J T
As mentioned previously the interchange of the integration order of singular and absolutely convergent integrals is possible. Hence, according to ( 1 1 .4), the right-hand side is equal to 1 r(o:) sin o:7r
b
J
x
ctg o:1r
X
lt'( T )dr
Ja (x - r) 1 - a '
which yields ( 1 1 . 18) . Relations ( 1 1 . 17) and ( 1 1 .19) follow from { 1 1 . 16) and ( 1 1 .18), respectively, if we use (2. 19) and take into account that QS = -SQ. Thus ( 1 1 . 16)-( 1 1. 19) have been proved for lf' E C(f . The operator r;; asr� is bounded in Lp , 1 < p < 1/o:, by Theorem 1 1 .3. Then in view of the boundedness of the operators I�+ and Ib from Lp into L q , q = p/(1 - o:p), we can deduce that the validity of ( 1 1 .16) for the dense set C(f in Lp , in accordance with Theorem 1 .7, implies its validity for all functions lf' E Lp , 1 < p < 1/o:. Relations ( 1 1. 17)-( 1 1 . 19) for lp E Lp , 1 < p < 1/ o:, are proved in the similar way. By the imbedding Lp1 (a, b) C Lp 2 (a, b), P1 > P2 , these relations are also true in the case p 2:: 1/o:. To clarify the validity of the relations in each point x E (a, b) in the case p > 1/o: we write an easily checked result
b 1
1
J
( 1 1 .20)
assuming that lf' E Lp, p > 1/o:. Since the operator r! - a Sr� - 1 is bounded, by Theorem 1 1.3, in Lp if p > 1/o:, then the right-hand side in ( 1 1 . 16) is a Holder function in accordance with Theorem 3.6. Therefore, ( 1 1 . 16) holds at each point. The other relations are justified similarly. It remains to consider the case p = 1 in ( 1 1 .18) and ( 1 1 . 19) . Similarly to ( 1 1 .20) we obtain
b f(t)dt .!_ c1 1 1 a a raa s -� I = ra sra / + ( x - a ) 1 - a ' c = 1r (t - a)a r a 1
J
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
208
provided that the integrals on the right-hand side exist. Therefore, for by simple calculations we find
b-
1 a raa sra I a
tn r
=
b-
1 a raa- 1 S -ra- 1 I a
tn r
fb
(b - x) a- 1 f(1 - a) tn(t}dt. a 7r
r
f = 16_ r.p
(11.21)
Hence, the boundedness of the operator r: s r; a 16_ from L 1 into Lr , 1 < r < 1/1-a is seen. Indeed, this is obvious for the second term on the right-hand side and follows from Theorems 5.6 and 11.3 for the first one. The case p = 1 in (11.18) is considered similarly. •
The spaces of functions representable by the fractional integrals 1 r.p and 6 with the density cp E Lp coincide with each other if 1 < p < 1/a. '; cp l+ _ Indeed, according to (11.16) and (11.17) we have
Corollary 1 .
b-
[a cp = 1aa+ ( cos a1rr.p + sm a1rr -asraa cp) , [aa+ cp = 1 a (cos a1rcp - sm a1rr6- a sr6a r.p} , r'b a Sr6 in Lp if p < 1/
·
b-
a
·
and therefore corollary follows from the boundedness of the operators Corollary 2.
r; a sr: and
Ot .
The following commutation relations ( 11.22)
are valid.
Similarly to ( 1 1.13) we may interpret differentiation of the singular integral
) (!ab ( b - t ) a f(t)dt t-x b ) a f(t)dt ) Df:_ (! ( � a t-a t-x
D �+
�
=
=
(11.22}
as the formulae of fractional
a (D:+ f}(t) fab (� ) t - x dt, t-a a (D f:_ /)(t) fab (� ) t - x dt, x-a
(1 1.22')
§
11.
FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND THE SINGULAR OPERATOR
Corollary 3.
209
Together with (11.16)-(11.19) the following relations
b 1 1 cp(t)dt , . 1 a ----=1 Sraa- cp + lex b- cp = cos a1r lexa+ cp + sm a1r /a+ r (a ) I (t - a ) 1 - a ( 11.23) r� a b 1 1 cp(t)dt . cx 1 lexa+ cp = cos a1r lex b - cp - sm a7rlexb - ra- 1 Srb - cp + r(a) I (b - t) 1 - cx ' b {11.24) a b a ) -1 a 1 (x . 1 lexb cp = cos a1r lexa+ cp + sm a1rrba- s cx lexa+ cp + r ( a) I cp(t )dt, ( 11.25) rb - 1 a
b 1 a(b 1 x) . 1 lexa+ cp = cos a1r lex b- cp - sm a1rraa - s racx- 1 lex6_ cp + r ( a) I cp (t )dt, ( 11.26) a
are also valid where 0 < a < 2, cp(x) E Lp(a, b) and p > max(1, 1/a) in (11.23) and (11.24) and 1 � p < oo in (11.25) and (11.26). The assertions of Corollary 3 follow directly from (11.16)-(11.19) on the basis of relations similar to (11.20) and (1 1.21). The proof of their validity for cp E Lp with the mentioned values of p is carried out as in Theorem 1 1.5 for (11.16)-(11.19). 3.12 (11.16)-(11.19) already proved are also valid for cp(x) E Lp( [a, b], p) , p(x) = n lx - X k i#Jic ' X k E [a , b], if -1 < IJ k < p - 1 (k = k= 1 1, . . . , n ) . In the case of {} = R� = [0, oo ) the connection between the fractional integration operators I�+ and I� and the similar operator S can be obtained from {11.16)-(11.19) by means of the passage to a limit as a � 0 and b � oo. These Remark 11.3. By Theorem
n
relations are given by the following equalities,
(11.27) (11.28) (11.29) (11.30) where cp(x) E Lp (R�), 1 < p < 1/a, in (11.27), (11.28) and (11.30) and 1 � p < 1/a in (11.29). We also note that (11.27) and (11.30) follow from (11.16) and (11.19), while (11.28) follows from (11.1 1) in view of (11.12), and (11.29) follows from
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
210
(11.10).
Moreover,
{11.27)-{1 1.30) lead to commutation relations (11.31)
of the type ( 1 1.20). Similarly, (11 .23)-(11.26) can be transferred to the half-axis R� . We conclude this subsection with the following assertion . Lemma 11.1.
Let 0 < a < 1. The operators rp(t)dt , X > 0, Arp = cos a 1rrp( x ) - -- -J0 t - X sin a1r 1r
sin a1r B rp = cos a1rrp( x ) + -1r
00
J 0
00
lt'(t) dt , (-t ) 0 -t-x
x
( 11.32)
X > 0,
(11.33)
are mutually inverse: ABrp = EArp = rp for rp(x) E Lp(R�), 1 < p < 1/a. This lemma follows from comparison of (11 .27) and (11.28). Really, they have the form l�rp = 10+ Brp and 10+ rp = !�A lp . Hence it is obvious that ABrp = BA lp = rp for sufficiently good functions rp(x), and then it is true for all rp( x) E Lp ( R�) by the boundedness of the operators A and B in Lp(R� ) , 1 < p < 1/a, which follows from Theorem 11.3. We note that the identities ABrp = BArp = rp may be checked by the direct evaluation of the compositions AB and BA by the Poincare-Bertrand formula
Proof.
{11.9) . •
1 1 .4. Some other composition relations We show that if f(x) E l0(Lp), then "a truncation" of the function belongs to l0(Lp)· Namely, let -oo � a < b � oo and P. ab 'P -
{
- lt'(x), x E [a, b), x (/. [a, b], 0,
but in the case of the half-axes P+ 'P -
{ rp(x), 0,
f(x)
also
( 11.34)
[a, b] = R� or [a, b] = R� we write
X > 0, X < 0,
{
X > 0, P_ rp = 0, lt'(x) , X < 0.
( 11.35)
211
§ 1 1 . FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND THE SINGULAR OPERATOR
We shall also prove that Pa b lf. operator in Lp . Theorem 11.6.
=
If.Ncp,
1 < p < 1/ o: , N being a bounded
Let cp(x) E Lp (R1 ) 1 < p < 1/o:. Then ,
(11.36)
{ tn(x)
where
T
1/J( X) =
+
sin cnr
0,
11"
oo
a 1,0( t) I (!) - dt ' X > 0, � �+t
0
X < 0.
(11.37)
First we note that 1/J(x) E Lp by Theorem 1.5. Then it is clear that (If.,P)(x) = 0 if x < 0. It remains to prove (If.,P)(x) = (If.cp)(x) if x > 0. We have 0 � (� � ( )a t a �-t a1r I ( T) a
Proof.
-
(I'i-V>)(z) = (J�+ 'I')(z) +
C
·
0 � J f ( ) - oo (z�t;)�� a = (I'i-rp)(z),
which completes the proof. • We emphasize that Theorem 11.6 means that if the function f(x) is representable by the fractional integral of a function in Lp(R1 ) , 1 < p < 1/o:, then the function f+ tx) = f(x) if x > 0, and f+ (x) = 0 if x < 0 has the same property. Corollary 1.
Let cp(x) E Lp(R1 ) 1 < p < 1/o:. Then ,
(11.38) where
oo t-) a ,o(a-t�dt cp(x) 1ra1r I0 ( �- a (� +t- a a ,o( -t dt a � t ) a1r [ Y ( �(� +t- a a 0 a ,o(b-t dt ] 00 - [ ( t ) (�+t-b� 0,
1/J(x) =
+
sin
sin
11"
x=tJ
1 a
1- a '
1 a'
x < a, a < x < b, X > b.
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
212
Let a(x) be a piecewise constant function with a finite number of point discontinuous. Then a(x)f(x) E Ia(Lp) for f(x) E Ia (Lp ) and ll af ii ia (L, ) :5 c ll f llia (L ,) ·
Corollary 2.
Let f(x) be a piecewise Holder function on the axis with a finite number of points of discontinuities and with Holder exponent A > max( a, -a + 1/p) and let f(oo) = 0. Then f(x) E Ia (Lp ) ·
Theorem 11. 7.
Proof. For simplicity we assume f(x) to have only one discontinuity at z = introduce the functions
0.
We
{
{
z 2:: 0, f (z) = w2 (z), z > 0, /1 (z) = wf(x), 2 f(x), z :5 0, 1 (z), z < 0, having chosen the functions w 1 (z),w2 (z) E C(f such that w 1 (0) = f( + O), w 2 (0) = f( - 0) . Then /i (z) E H>. (R1 ) and fi (oo) = 0, i = 1, 2 . Therefore, fi (x) E Ia (Lp ) by Theorem 6.5. It is obvious that f(x) = fJ(x)ft(x) + 8( -z) h (z), where fJ(x) = (1 + sign z)/2, so that f(x) E Ia (Lp ) by Theorem 1 1.6. • It is clear that we can obtain the analogous relation P_ I� cp = I� g from (11 .36) with the function g(x), written similarly to (11.37). The following theorem represents P_ /� cp as lf.g. We denote Sa
Theorem 1 1 .8.
!_ l a cp(t) dt . l f 1r
.!_ =
00
- oo
z
t-x
( 11.39)
For cp(x) E Lp (R1 ), 1 < p < 1/a, the relation (11 .40)
is valid where the operator N given by
l
Ncp = cos a?rP_ cp + sin a1rScp - sin a1rP+ Sa P+ cp
is bounded in Lp (R1 ) .
sin a1r Joo 1r
COS
sin1r Joo ( x!. ) a !f1!l x-t dt ' z > 0, - oo 0 00 a1rcp(z) + sin""a 1r J
_
(11.41)
mr
(11.42)
§ 12. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF THE POTENTIAL TYPE
213
Proof. Applying (11.10) we have ( 11 .43) We rewrite ( 11.36)
as
(11 .44) Substituting (11 .44) into (11 .43) we obtain P_ IC:.cp =I+ (cos a7rP_ cp + sin a7rP_Scp + sin a1r cos a1rP+ Sa P_ cp + sin2 a7rP+ Sa P- Scp).
(11 .45)
Interchanging the order of integration in the last term we find according to ( 1 1 .9) that
if z >
0.
Here, the inner integral is equal to
p
(11.46) where v( r) = 1 if T > 0, and v ( r) = cos a1r if T < and Marichev (1; 2.2.4.25, 26]). Therefore,
0.
(see Prudnikov, Brychkov,
( 1 1 .47) After that (11.45) turns into the desired relation (11.40). The boundedness of the operator (11.41) in L,(R 1 ) in the case 1 < p < 1/a follows from that of S and Sa in L,(R1 ) (see Theorem 11.3). •
§ 12. Fractional Integrals of the Potential Type In many fields of mathematical analysis there frequently occur operators of fractional integration with "constant limits of integration" (they admit a natural extension to the case of many variables). From analogies in mathematical physics
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
214
such operators came to be called potential type operators. In this section we shall not be concerned with the corresponding forms of fractional differentiation, i.e. we will not consider the construction of operators inverse to potentials. They will be framed in § We begin the consideration of potentials by studying first the case of functions given on the whole axis R1 .
30.4.
12.1. The real axis. The Riesz and Feller potentials We consider the integral
Ia
cp(t)dt 1 cp - 2r(a)cos(a?r/2) J lt - x l l - a - oo 00
'
Re a > 0 ' a �..,... 1, 3 5 '
' · · ·
(12.23)
(12. 1 ) (12.24).
the choice of normalizing factor being clarified below - see and The integral Ia cp is called We shall consider side by side with ( 12.1 ) the following modification
the Riesz potential.
Ha
(x -t) cp = 2r(a) sin(a1r/2) J sign l x -ti l- a cp(t)dt , 1
00
-oo
Rea > 0,
a ;/; 2, 4, 6, . . . , (12.2)
It is evident that
Ia = [2cos(a?r/2)t 1 (1+ + I�), Ha = [2 s in (a7r/2)t 1 ( 1+ - J�),
(5.2)
( 1 2 .3) ( 12.4)
and (5.3) . Thus operators 1a and H a with where I± are operators E , 1 � p < 1/Rea, and in < Re < 1 are defined on functions ) , provided that the case < p < 1/Re a are bounded from into
0 q
a
1
= p(1 - pRea) - 1 •
It will be shown in § constructed in the form ( ]a )
Lp(R1 ) cp(t) Lp(R1) L9(R1
30 .4 that operators inverse to 1a and Ha may be
. 1 I( - t) - I ( ) dt - 1 I = 2r(-a)cos(a7r/2) J lt l l + a - oo 00 1 _ - 2r(-a)cos(a7r/2) j l(x -t) + lt(x1+ a+ t) - 21(x) dt, (12.1') 00
0
X
X
§ 12. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF THE POTENTIAL TYPE
1 (H a ) - 1 f = 2f ( -a) sin(a ?r /2)
00
J
- oo
f(x - t) - f(x) s. gn t dt jtj l +a i
00
1 f(x - t) - f(x + t) dt = 2f (-a) sin(a j ?r/2) t l +a 0 ( compare these with
Let
(12.2')
(5.57) and (5.58) for the Marchaud fractional derivative ) . s
Lemma 12.1.
215
1r
00
J
(12.5)
- oo
Operators Ia and na are connected by the relations (12.6) (12.7)
where 0 < Re a < 1,
Proof.
Fractional integration operators I± are represented via potential type operators Ia and n a by the equations
Corollary.
a?r . a?r ) E =F sm S , I± = Ia (cos T T
a1r s) a1r I±a = H a (± sm. 2 E + cos , T
(12.8) (12.9)
where 0 < Re a < 1 and E is the identity operator. To verify (12.8) and (12.9) it is sufficient to apply (12.6) and (12.7) and use then the relations (12.3) and ( 12.4). • Equations (12.3) and (12.4) actuate the natural generalization of the operators Ia and Ha in the form of an arbitrary linear combination of the operators I+. and
Proof.
/� :
( 12.10)
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
216
u and v being arbitrary constants. The operator ( 12. 10) may be written down as Mu,a v
c1
1 __ r(a)
00
J -oo
Ct + c2 sign ( z - t) lz - t p- a
( 12.11)
= ( u + v)/2 and c2 = ( u - v)/2 so that ( 12.12)
We shall call the operator (12.10) form 1 . 16a
00
J - oo
the Feller potential.
Such operators in the
}
(12. 13)
sin{ a[7r/2 + 6 sign (t - z )]
were first introduced by Feller [1] who proved that they satisfy the semigroup property IfIf
Remark 12.1. The operator
M:;,"
has a rather simple form of inverse operator which is similar to the Marchand fractional derivative. The inverse operator is especially simple in the case of operators Ia and H a . We give the inverse of the potential type operator M:; " in § 30.4 below. , In Theorem 12.1 below we shall show that a composition of two operators of the form (12.10) is again an operator of such a type. We need the following preliminary lemma.
Let 0 < a < 1 , 0 < {3 < 1 , Then
Lemma 12.2.
1/(a + {3).
a + {3 < 1
and
1 ::; p <
sin ( a + /3)1rr;.I�
( 12. 15)
sin( a + {3)1r IC:. I!
( 12. 16)
§ 12. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF THE POTENTIAL TYPE
Proof.
217
Using equations (11.10) and (11.11), we have I�I!r.p = cos a1r I:+/3 r.p + sin a1rSI:+fJr.p, I+I�r.p = cosa1riC:.+13r.p - sina1rSIC:.+P r.p.
Bence by (12.3) and (12.4) (If.I� + I� I!)r.p = 2 cos a1r cos a ; {3 1rIa+/3 r.p + 2 sin a1r sin a ; {3 1rSHa+fJ r.p, (I�I! - If. I� )r.p = 2 cos a1r sin a ; {3 1rHa+/3r.p + 2 sin a1r cos a ; {J 1rSia+fJ r.p, Using Lemma 12.1 we obtain the relations
•
which yield (12.15) and (12.16) after simple transformations. Theorem 12.1. Let Mua and Me be operators of the fonn (12.10) and let 0 < a < 1, 0 < {3 < 1 and a+ {3 < 1. Then 1,
v
1
:lt
v
:l
(12.17) where r.p E Lp (R1 ), 1 � p < 1/(a + [J), and u = u 1 u2 + u 1 v2 sinsm. a1r( a++v{3)1 u1r2 sin {31r
Proof.
,
Since any of the compositions I�I�r.p is defined for r.p E Lp (R1 ), 1 � p <
1/(a + [J), we have
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
218
by the semigroup property (5.15). Equations (12.15) and (12.16) allow us to represent the compositions If. I� , I� I! via I:+P and I� + P , which change (12.18) into (12.17) after simple manipulations. • Corollary
1. If 0 < a < 1, 0 < {3 < 1,
a + {3 <
1 then (12.19) (12.20) ( 12.21)
Corollary
2. I/ 0 < a < 1, 0 < {3 < 1,
a + {3 <
1, then (12.22)
(12.22) is easily obtained using (12.14) and equations (12.19)-(12.21). We note finally that (12.3) and (12.4) allow various other properties of the operators I� to be easily extended to operators F:x , H 01 and M::,v . The following theorem is in particular true. Theorem
12.2. Let 0 < a < 1 and
=
[
The proof is easily derived from (7.1) and Theorem 7. 1 using relations (12.4) and (12.10).
(12.23) (12.24) (12.25) (12.3),
12.2. On the "truncation" of the Riesz potential to the half-axis Similarly to Lemma 11.1 we ask the question: if f(x) = l 01
§ 12. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF THE POTENTIAL TYPE
219
representable by the Riesz potential? That is
O+ (z)(Ia
(12.26) ( 12.27)
tP( z) from
Theorem 12.3. Given a function
( 12.28) where ( 12.29) -oo
Proof. It follows from (11.36) that O_ (z)(J,t
Then by
(5.9) ( 12.30)
where Z
sin o:1r _ - (J+ ( Z )
1r
dt ( ) J l zt al a
- -- .
X
0
(11.36) and (12.30) and using (12.3) we obtain the equation ( 12.31)
where by
the function given in
(11.37).
Using
(12.8)
in
220
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
(12.31) we establish the equation
Thus the desired function .,P( x) in
( 12.26) is equal to
In order to evaluate the singular integral S( cp2 cpa ) here, it is necessary to apply the Poincare-Bertrand relation (11.9) for interchanging the order of singular integration. After simple manipulations this finally reduces the function ,P( x) to the form (12.28). It remains to show that the function .,P(x) belongs to Lp (R 1 ). This follows from the boundedness of the operator N a in Lp(R 1 ), 1 < p < 1/o:, the latter being obtained by passing to the half-axes Rl and using Theorems 5.5 and 1 1.3. • Note that (12.26), in which .,P(x) is defined by (12.28), may be checked directly by the immediate interchange of the order of integration in the composition JOL N a , if we take into account that the inner integral that arises can be evaluated m elementary functions: -
f-oo ltla lt - x l lt-a(tdt 00
sign
y)
= 1rctg
0:1r sign xsign ( x - y) 2 IY i a lx - Yl l -a ·
- see for example Prudnikov, Brychkov, and Marichev Corollary.
Let Pab
{ 0,
cp(x ), x E d x 'F-
(12.32)
[1, 2.2.6.26, 2.2.6.27].
[a, b], . Then [a, b] . ( 12.33)
where
§ 12. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF THE POTENTIAL TYPE
221
12.3. The case of the half-axis Potentials (12.1) and ( 12.2) may be considered on the half-axis as well:
z0a cp H0a cp =
1 2f(a) cos(a7r/2)
1 2f(a) sin(a7r/2)
00
00
cp(t)dt
J0 lx - t i l -a '
x > O,
(x - t) cp( t )dt, j sign l x - tp-a 0
X>
( 12.34)
0,
( 12.35)
hence clearly 1 ( 1001+ + 1-01 ) ' = 2 cos(a7r/2) = (Io+ - I� ) . ng 2 sin(�1r /2) 1 01 0
Also relations of the type (12.6) and ( 12.7) are valid as well:
( 12.36) ( 12.37) where the designation
.!. f (!.)., cp(t)dt , s-y (f' = 1r X t-X 00
0
X>
0,
( 12.38)
is used. Equations (12.36) and ( 12.37) may be obtained from ( 12.46) and (12.47), proved below, by pass ing to the limit as b -+ oo. They may also be proved independently in a fashion similar to the derivation of (12.46) and ( 12.47).
We prove now an important property of the Riesz potential ]01 cp and the integral H01cp: their representability by a composition of fractional integrals, which is as follows.
222
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Theorem 12.4.
Let 0 < a < 1 and 1p(x) E Lp(R�), 1 � p < 1/a. Then cr/ 2 !p, l0cr fP - 1cr/ 2 IO+ _
(12.39)
-
(12.40) and more generally the formula {3 Q Q - f3 {3 c/'1 = cos --11" 10cr+ f3 11'1 + sm --1rH0cr +f3 c/'1 I-cr 1O+r r 2 2 sin et11" cr+f3 IP + sin {311" I+cr+fJ IP = I sin ( a + {3)1r sin ( a + {3 ) 1r ·
r
-
{12.41)
is valid under assumptions that 1p(x) E Lp (R�), 1 � p < 1/{a + {3), a + {3 < 1. Proof. We shall prove {12.41), the equation {12.39) and (12.40) being obviously obtained from (12.41). Interchanging the order of integration we have 00
I�Ig+ IP = f (a)1f ({3) f J (x, y)cp(y)dy, 0
where
j
00
J(x, y) =
{12.42)
(t - y)f3- 1 (t - x)" - 1 dt.
max(z, y )
From equation (1.71) we obtain the relations J (x, y) = B(a, 1 - a - f3) 1 x - Yl cr +fJ- 1 for x > y and J(x, y) = B({3, 1 - a - f3) 1x - Yl cr +fJ- 1 for x < y. Thus (12.41) is derived from (12.42) by easy steps. • We note finally that (7.11) and (7.12) yield the following relations for the cosine- and sine-Fourier transforms ( cf. (12.23) and (12.24)):
(12.43) 12.4. The case of a finite interval In the case of a finite interval be denoted by
a
�
x � b operators similar to (12.1) and (12.2) will
§ 12. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF THE POTENTIAL TYPE
A a tp -
_
B a tp -
1 fb tp(t)dtp ' a < x < b ' 2f( a) cos(a7r/2) a lx - t - a
1 fb sign (x - t) tp(t )dt a < x < b. 2f(a) sin(a7r/2) a l x - t i l -a '
223
( 12.44) ( 12.45)
They admit relations analogous to (12.36) and (12.37) . That is, the following theorem holds:
Let 0 < a < 1 . Then
Theorem 12.5.
(12.46) (12.47) where, unlike (12 38), .
b
- t)]'Ytp(t) dt, S-r iP - 1r[(x - a)(b - x)]-r j [(t - a)(b t-x a 1
_
( 12.48)
( 12.46) and (12.47) being valid for example for functions tp(t) E Lp(p), 1 < p < oo, p(x) = (x - a) �' (b - x ) , where p , 11 < p - 1 in (12.47) and in the first part of (12.46), while p, 11 < 1ta p - 1 in the second part of (12.46). "
Equations (12.46) and (12.47) are derived from the fundamental relations (11.16)-(11.19). We shall illustrate this by proving the first of the equations in (12.47) as an example. Replacing tp(x) by the function tp 1 = cos a2r tp + sin a2r Sa/ 2 "P in (11.17) we have
Proof.
a 7r IP + sm. a ?r S ) a (cos T la+ 2 a/ 2 "P
= 16- (cos a1rE - sin a1rr;; a Sr6) (cos a21r tp + sin a27r Saf 2 IP) ,
where E is the identity operator and rb tp = (b-x)tp(x ). Applying here the Poincare Bertrand relation (11.9) and using (11.5) we derive by simple manipulations the
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
224
following symmetrical relation
(
. a7r S /2� a cos a7r � + sm ]a+ 2 a 2
a7r � - sm. a7r S /2�) ) = ]a (cos 2 . 2 a b-
Hence cos a2w (I:+ - 16_ )� = - sin a2w (I:+ + lb"_ )Sa/2�, which coincides with the first of the identities in (12.47). By a similar way other relations are proved. The above arguments are applicable to sufficiently good functions. Justification of (12.46) and (12.47) for functions � E Lp (P) is easily obtained by means of Theorem 1 .7 provided we take into account the following: 1) the density of "good" functions in Lp (p); 2) the boundedness in Lp (p) of operators involved in (12.46) and (12.47): this follows from Theorems 3.7 and 11.3, which show the boundedness of the operators A a , B a and S( a +l)/2 for p, v E (p(a + 1)/2 - 1,p - 1), of the operators A a , s- ( a+ l)/2 and Ba for Jl , V E (ap - 1, �p - 1), and of the operators B a , Aa , Sa/2 and S-a /2 for Jl , v E (ap - 1,p - 1); 3) imbeddings in the spaces Lp (p) , p(x) = (x - a)P (b - x) v , in respect to parameters Jl and v. •
§ 13. Functions Representable by Fractional Integrals on an Interval This section adjoins § 6, where we characterized functions which are fractional integrals of functions in Lp (R1 ) We give here a similar characterization in the case of an interval (and half-line) as well as a characterization of fractional integrals of weighted Holder functions. The latter is obtained as a theorem on the mapping of the space H�(p) onto nt + a (p) (Theorem 13.13). As a preliminary we consider an analogue of the Marchaud fractional derivative on an interval. We also call the reader 's attention to the theorem in § 13.3 on the continuation and sewing of fractional integrals. It is assumed everywhere below in this section that 0 < a < 1 . One may also admit 0 < Rea < 1 .
13. 1 . The Marchaud fractional derivative on an interval We now transform the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative VC:+ f to a form similar to (5.57). For this purpose we consider the function f(x) to be at first differentiable. Integrating in (2.24) by parts, we have
f(x) - f(t) dt . 1. f(t) - f(x) = f { l - a) (xf(x) + 1m +a ( z - 1)0 (x - t) l + o - a)0 (13.1) 1
{
! X
•-•
}
§ 13. FUNCTIONS REPRESENTABLE BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
The middle term here vanishes for
225
f(t) E C1 , and we denote
(x ) naa+ I _- r (1 - fa)(x -
+
a
X
a)a f(1 - a) j a
f(x) - f+(t ) dt , (x - t) l a
(13.2)
V�+ f D�+ / for sufficiently good (differentiable) functions in view of (13.1). The result in (13.2) may be called an analogue of the Marchaud fractional derivative in the case of an interoal [a, b], < < b :::; One may come to (13.2) by another way if one continues the function f ( x ) by =:
so that
-oo
a
oo .
zero beyond the interval [a, b] and applies the usual Marchand fractional derivative on the whole real line. Namely, let
f* ( x) = { f0,( x) , xa :::;(/. [a,x :::;b].b, (13.3) Then direct calculation shows that D + f* is for a < x < b exactly the same as the
right-hand side of (13.2), namely
(13.4) (D + f* )(x) = (D�+ /)(x) , a < x < b. In connection with ( 13.4) we observe that many results of this section, in
particular Theorems 13.1-13.4, may be deduced as corollaries of the corresponding theorems in § 6 by means of (13.4). However we prefer to give their independent and direct proof, avoiding continuation to the whole axis, since the questions of fractional integro-differentiation on a finite interval are of more practical interest in comparison with the case of the whole axis. The is introduced similarly, thus
right-hand sided Marchaud fractional derivative n ba- j --
1 f(x) + a jb l( x) - f(t) dt, f(1 - a) (b - z)a f(1 - a) ( x - t ) l + a
(13.5)
X
It is clear that the right-hand side of (13.2) is defined not only for differentiable functions, but for example, for functions satisfying the Holder condition of order .A > as well. Is it true that the Riemann-Liouville and Marchand derivatives coincide with each other for all functions, for which they are defined? We shall see below (see Corollary of Theorem 13.1) that they coincide for functions representable by fractional integrals of summable functions. We emphasize that the integral in (13.2) will be understood, in general, as conventionally convergent. Correspondingly let us introduce the truncated
a,
f(x),
226
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
fractional derivative similarly to
(5.59):
a ,e f = f 1 ) f(x) + f a ) tPe (x), D a+ {1 - a (x - a) a {1 - a where
"'' (x) = o/ £
(13.6)
- f(t) f f(x) (x - t) l +a dt > 0 .
X-£
a
'
c
(13.7)
Writing this down we assume that x � a + c. To introduce tPe ( x) for a � x � a + c we have to define the function f(t) for t < a. Two variants are possible: 1) to introduce tPe (x) for a � x � a + c by (13.7) considering f(x) to be continued by zero beyond the interval [a, b]; then
tPe (x) = f(x)
X-£
J (x - t) - l -adt = f(x)a [_!_ga - (x -1 a)a a
],
(13.8)
2) to set tPe (x) = 0 for a � x � a + c . For functions f( x) , which are not "very good" , the fractional Marchaud derivative ( 13.2) will be understood as (13.9) where the mode of passage to a limit will be defined by the functions in hand. In particular it will be in the norm of the space Lp when considering fractional integrals of functions in Lp ( see Theorem 13.1). Both variants of the definition of the function tPe (x) for a � x � a + c will be used. We denote
t/J(x) = lim tPe (x ). £ -0
(13.10)
We note that variant 1) to define the function t/Je (x) for a � x � a + c has the advantage that it is connected with (13.4), i.e. the truncated fractional derivative (13.6) coincides with Marchaud truncated derivative Df.,e f* :
(D +,e f* )(x) = (D�+ , e:f)(x), a < X < b,
(13.11)
§ 13. FUNCTIONS REPRESENTABLE BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
227
where j• (x) is the same as in (13.3), provided that 'fllc (x) is defined for a � x � a + c by the variant 1. First of all let us verify that D�+ is indeed the left inverse operator of the operator of fractional integration within the frames of the spaces Lp . Theorem 13.1.
0
1. Then
Let f = 1:+ cp, cp E Lp(a, b),
- oo
< a < b � oo , 1 � p < oo,
Proof. Since x-a
x-a
0
t
/(x) - f(x - t) = rta) J ya- l cp(x - y)dy - rta) J (y - t) a- l cp(x - y)dy, using
(6.10) we have f(x) - f(x - t) = t a- l
x-a
j k (i) cp(x - y)dy. 0
So for a + c
� x � b we obtain x-a
j
'fllc (x) =
0
Here the function
Since
cp(x - y) dy y
y Jc
j k(s )ds.
y / (z-a)
K:(t) (see (6.12)) arises, so
sin a r .JL a- l by (6.7) ' we have K: ( .JL x-a ) = r ( x-a ) a r(1 - a) 'fllc (x) =
(x-a)Jc
J 0
f(x) K:( y)cp(x - cy) dy - r (1 - a) (x - a)a .
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
228
For convenience we consider the function interval (a, b]. Then in view of (6.8)
J
00
D �+ .�:f -
(13.12)
0
As for
a
5x5
a + e: from (13.8) we have nacr+ ,�: I -
(13.13)
X
+ a)dt - 11'"ccr j
_
sin n1r
Applying the generalized Minkowsky inequality
(1.33), we obtain
00
II D �+ .e / -
+ e:crr(l1 - n) 11 / IIL .( a,a +e ) ·
The first term in the right-hand side tends to zero by Theorem 1.2. As for the second term, we have
f dt
{f
a+�: a +e IIJII L . (a,a+e ) < sin I
as
(13.14)
1.2 and Lemma
}!"
(13.15)
e: --+ 0. •
For functions f = J�+
§ 13. FUNCTIONS REPRESENTABLE BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
continuous functions. (2.14) . .
229
In a non-direct form this assertion is already intrinsic in
In Theorem 13.1 we considered D�+ , £ 1 to be defined for a � x < a + c- by introducing the function 1/;£ (x) via (13.8). If we set .,P£ (x) = 0 for a � x � a + c- , Theorem 13.1 remains valid except for the case p = 1. The proof is the same with the only difference that the second term in (13.14) is to be replaced by r( l�a) 1 cl�:�a 1 a , a+£ , which tends to zero for 1 < p < oo only, see (5.46).
Remark 13.1.
L p(
)
13.2. C.haracterization of fractional integrals of functions in LP
tP£(x),
In terms of the function defined by (13.7) and (13.8), we derive here, as in § 6.3, the necessary and sufficient conditions for the representability of a function I ( by a fractional integral of a function in Lp (a, b). The corresponding theorem will be given in two variants.
x)
In order that a function l (x) be representable as I = I:+
Theorem 13.2.
a
function (13.7) -(13.8), in the case 1 � p < oo these conditions being sufficient. (L p )
I: r.p , r.p D�++,£ 1
Proof. Necessity. Let I = E Lp . The necessity of the condition I E Lp is trivial. By Theorem 13.1 converges to in Lp (a, b), which was desired. Sufficiency. Let I E Lp and lim We consider the function = a
=
a
a
=
=
=
y- £ l(y) - l(t) dy + aaj+£ (x - yp-a j ( y - t)l+a dt } a X
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
230
in the case a + e ::; x
::; b.
Hence by simple transformations we obtain
{13.17)
The result
{13.18)
a c < a < b,
ReJl
> 0, Rev > 0,
is valid. This is proved by the change of variable y -c = (b-c)(a-c)[(b-a)t+a-c] - 1 • Using this equation in {13.17) we find that r)/
a + SC'
€
=
f( y)dy - XI- f(t)(x - e - t)0 dt } . { /X 7re 0 {x - y)l-o t £
sin 0' 7r
a
X-
a
Hence it is easily shown that
r:+ so£
(x
=
- a)/£
I 0
K(t)f(x - et)dt, a + e ::; X ::; b,
where K(t) is the function {6.7). As for the case a ::; x < a + e,
Iaa+
cp £
-
sin a7r
7rea
by {13.8) we have
IX (xf(y)dy yp - o ' a
( 13.19)
_
a ::; x < a + e.
{13.20)
Having obtained the representations {13.19) and {13.20), it is now easily shown similarly to transformations in {13.12)-{13.14) that I:+ so£ � / . This completes the proof. • Remark 13.2. If p = 1, then for a function f(x) = 1:+ so, so E L 1 (a, b) the statement f(x)(x - a) - a E L 1 (a, b) is in general untrue ( see the counterexample {5.41)). In this case £lim tP£ fl. L 1 in general, and the necessity condition does not
-0
§ 13. FUNCTIONS REPRESENTABLE BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
231
hold in Theorem 13.2 for p = 1. We may, however, include the case p = 1 into the necessity part if instead of convergence in L 1 ( a, b ) of the sequence t/Je we require L 1 ( a, b)-convergence of the sequence ( 13.16). We introduce also a modification of the function t/Je ( x). Namely we set
;fie (x) =
X-E
- f(t) dt, J f(x) (x - t) l +a
-
oo
a<
x < b,
( 13.21)
assuming that the function f(x) is continued by zero beyond the interval [a, b] . It is easily verified that ;fie (x) = [a/f(1 - a)] -1 r,oe (x), where r,c>e (x) is the function (13.16). So, if we replace t/Je (x) by ;fie (x) in Theorem 13.2, it would be valid for 1 � p < oo, 0 < a < 1 both in the necessity and sufficiency parts taking Theorem 13.1 into account. We recall that the case p = 1 was considered earlier when we gave the characterization of fractional integrals I:+ r,o, r,o E L 1 ( a, b) , in Theorem 2.1 in other terms. Note that one can formulate in an obvious way the analogue of Theorem 13.2 for right-hand sided fractional integrals Ib- r,o, directly following from Theorem 13.2 in view of (2.19). Further, the following theorem similar to Theorem 6.2 is valid. Theorem 13.3. In order that f(x) = I:+ r,o, -oo < a < x < b < oo, with r,o E L, (a, b) , 1 < p < oo, it is necessary and sufficient that f(x) E L, ( a, b) and
the latter being equivalent to the condition sup I ;fie I , e>O function (13.21). Besides
<
oo,
where ;fie ( x) is the
r,o(x) = f(1 a- a) e-o lim t/J-e (x). (L p )
The necessity is evidently contained in Theorem 13.2, while the sufficiency part is obtained from the representations (13.19) and (13.20) by the same arguments as those used in proving the sufficiency part of Theorem 6.2. - see considerations following (6.24). We note also a variant of Theorem 13.3 which is convenient, due the fact that it uses information about the function t/Je (x) for a + c � x � b only, and covers the case of the half-axis.
232
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
-oo < a < z < b $ oo , where and 1 < p < 1/o: with b = oo it is necessary and sufficient that /(z)(z - a)- a E Lp (a, b) and
Theorem 13.4. In order that f
= I�+
I b
(x) P < oo. e>Oa+e ltPe I
sup
(13.22)
This theorem is obtained from direct analysis of the proof of Theorem 13.3. Now we shall make use of the notations I:+ (Lp ) and Ir_(Lp ) for the images of fractional integration operators on Lp . We established above (see Corollary 1 of Theorem 11.4, Corollary 1 of Theorem 11.5 and (11.27)-(11.30)) that
where Lp = Lp (a, b), -oo $ a < b $ oo . Consequently, the characterizations of the spaces I�+ (Lp ) and Ir_ (Lp ) are equivalent in the case 1 < p < 1/o:. We shall denote
(13.23) - oo
The space (13.23) becomes a Banach space if for f = 1:+
The space /a (Lp (a, b)] has been characterized in Theorems 13.2 and 13.3. By Theorem 13.2 it may be treated as a Sobolev type space of functions in Lp (a, b) which have a fractional derivative D�./ E Lp (a, b). In this connection we observe that when dealing with fractional integro-differentiation, the space H a ·P (a, b), which is the restriction of Bessel potentials onto an interval [a, b] is often considered in the literature. This will be discussed in § 18.4 below. Now we indicate only that
in the case -oo < a < b < oo, see the proof in § 18.4. Now we give a simple condition which is sufficient for representing a function
§ 13. FUNCTIONS REPRESENTABLE BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
233
f( z) by a fractional integral of a function in Lp . Let
} VP { b wp (/, h) = ja 1/(z) - f(x - t) IP dx , [a, b]. /(z) b-a If f(x) E Lp (a, b) and J t - l -awp (/,t)dt oo, then /(z) E sup
( 13.24)
ltl< h
where it is assumed that Theorem 13.5.
/01[Lp (a, b)],
is continued by zero beyond the interval <
0
1 < p < 1/o:. This theorem follows directly from Theorem 13.4, since
A rather simple sufficient condition for a function /( x) to be represented by a fractional integral of a function cp E L 1 (a, b) will be given in § 14.5 in terms of the weighted absolute continuity of the function /(x). One of the simplest conditions for a function f(x) to be a fractional integral is the assumption that /(z) E H>. with ..\ > o:. Then the convergence of 1/Jc(x) is obvious and Theorem 13.2 is immediately applicable. Clearly this condition is redundant: it gives f = 1:+ cp, where cp is not only in Lp , but also Holderian, see Lemma 13.1 below. The following statement is of more interest. Theorem 13.6. Let f(z) = (x - a) - �' g(x), b < oo , > o:, -o: < I' < 1 . Then
..\
where c does not depend on z and
E.
where g(x) E H>. ( [a, b] ) , - oo < a <
Besides f(x) E I:+ (Lp ) if I' + o: <
1/p,
1 � p < 00. The proof follows on the same lines as that of Theorem 6.6, with the corresponding simplifications due to the absence of the infinite point. Corollary.
/01[Lp ( a, b)],
/f g(z) E H>.([a, b] ) ,
..\ > o:, -o: < I' < - o: + 1/p,
then (b - z)-�'g(x) E
1 < p < 1/0:. Indeed, it is sufficient to refer to the coincidence of the transforms (13.23). Theorem 13.6 will be extended in the following subsection to the case of the
weights
N
ll l x - ak l�'• . - see Theorem 13. 12. k=l
234
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
We observe that the assertion l(z) E I:+ (Lp ) of Theorem 13.6 follows also from the fact that ( z a) - P E 1:+ ( Lp) with p(JJ + a) < 1 and from the following theorem which is similar to Theorem 6.7.
-
The space /�+ [Lp (a, b)], 1 � p < oo , 0 < a < 1, is invariant relative to multiplication by functions a(x) E H�([a, b]), .\ > a, and
Theorem 13.7.
This theorem is proved analogously to Theorem 6. 7 with certain simplifications. The following theorem is also valid.
The space Ia [Lp (a, b)), 1 < p < 1/a, is invariant relative to the weighted singular operators
Theorem 13.8.
b a JJ!l J Sa l = ( � ) t - a t - x dt, a
(13.25)
a
Lp , then also Sa l = 1:+ 1/J, t/J E Lp , and similarly for Sbl · The statement of this theorem follows from (11.18), (11.19) and (13.23).
z.e. if I = I�+, f.P,
13.3. Continuation, restriction and "sewing" of fractional integrals Let f(x) E I:+ [Lp (a, b)] on a given interval [a, b). We put the following questions: 1) does the function /(x), continued by zero beyond the interval [a, b], belong to I.A + [Lp (A, B)] on a larger interval [A, B] ::::> [a, b]? 2) does its restriction onto the smaller interval [c, d] C [a, b] belong to I�+ [Lp (c, d)]? Since fractional integrals of functions in Lp are continuous functions in the case p > 1/a and equal zero at one end-point, the answers in general are negative for p > 1/a. If p < 1/a the answers will be positive. - see Corollaries of Theorems 13.9 and 13.10. Theorems 13.9 and 13.10 will also lead to a very useful theorem on "sewing" of fractional integrals. Theorem 13.9. -oo
� a < b � oo .
Let f(x) E Ia (Lp ) = Ia [Lp (R 1 )], 1 < p < 1/a, and let Then restriction of the function l (x) onto [a, b] belongs to the
§ 13. FUNCTIONS REPRESENTABLE BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
f(x) = (I:+ ..P )(x), x > a, t/; (x) E Lp (a, b), where t/;( x) =
sin ct 7r 7['
a
I ( xa -- ea ) a x
- oo
d.£. ,
235
( 13.26)
( 13.27)
Theorem 13.9 is a convenient paraphrase of Theorem 11.6, in which we showed that the truncation of a function f(x) E I a [Lp (R 1 )] by zero beyond a given interval [a, b] leaves the function in the space Ia [Lp (R1 )]. Indeed, in the case x > 0 (11 .36) coincides with { 13.26). Without any loss of generality we may take a = 0.
Remark 13.3. Equation (13.26), i.e.
the identity ( 13.28)
with the choice of the function t/;(x) by the rule (13.27) is valid not only for
Corollary. Let
is . valid, where ,P(x) =
sin a7r 7['
a
I ( xa -- ea ) a x
Indeed the corollary immediately follows from (13.28) if in (13.28) we choose the function
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
236
The next theorem concerns the functions f(x) given on [a, b] , which are continued by zero beyond this interval. Let f * (x) =
.
Theorem 13.10. 1 < p < 1 / o: Then
Let
{
f(x), x E 0, x rt
l
( 13.29)
f(x) = I:+ cp, a � x � b, f * (x) = ( I� cp l )( x ) ,
IP 1 ( X) =
[a, b], [a, b].
0, cp(x),
xE
where
cp(x) E
R1 ,
( 13.30)
x < a, a < x < b,
b
L, (a, b),
( 13.31)
J (t�dt _ a - r( 1- a) J ( t l+a - g ( X ) ' X > b . a z-
Proof. We first show that g( x) E L,(b, oo). Indeed g(X) =
o: sin o:1r 1r
b
j a
IP ( T )dT
b
j T
dt
( x - t) l + a (t - r) l -a
.
( 13.32)
The inner integral here is evaluated by means of the change of variable x - (x - r)/e which gives
g( x) = _ sin1r0: 1r
b
Ja
( Xb -- Tb ) a
t=
( 13.33)
So g(x) E L,(b, oo) by the Hardy-Littlewood Theorem 1.5 on operators with a homogeneous kernel. In the case considered transferring the point b to the origin and reflecting onto the positive half-axis we obtain that the kernel k(x, t) in Theorem 1 .5 is (tfx) a (t + x ) - 1 . It remains to check ( 13.30), which is evidently valid for x � b, while for x > b we need to verify the equation 0=
b
z
g(t)dt
§ 13. FUNCTIONS REPRESENTABLE BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
237
The latter is established directly: we have to substitute here g(t) from (13.33), interchange the order of integration and then apply (11.4). The theorem is then proved. • Corollary.
then
Let
-oo
:5
a :5 c < d :5 b < oo . If f(x) E Ia [Lp (c, d)], 1 < p < 1/o:,
I (x) = { 0,/(x), •
x E [c, cl] x E [a, b] \ [c, d]
E
Ia [Lp (a, b)].
If f(x) E Ia [Lp (a, b)], 1 < p < 1/o: , then
The corollary is obtained by direct application of Theorems 13.9 and provided that the function f (x) is continued by zero beyond [a, b] or [c, cl].
13.10
(on "sewing"). Let functions !l (x) and h (x) be given on [a, c] and [c, b] respectively, - oo :5 a < c < b :5 oo and let
Theorem 13.11.
f (x) =
h (x), { h(x),
a :5 x :5 c, c < x :5 b.
If ft (x) E /a (Lp (a, c)], /2 (x) E Ia [Lp (c, b)], 1 < p < 1/o:, then f(x) E /a [Lp (a, b)] . This theorem is easily derived from the above corollary since /( x) = fi (x) + /2(x), where /Z(x) is the continuation by zero of the functions /�: (x) beyond the intervals where they are defined. Now we demonstrate an application of Theorem Theorem 13.12.
Let -oo < a = x 1 < x2 <
· · ·
13.10.
< Xn - 1 < Xn = b < oo . Then
E I a [Lp (a, b)], 1 < p < 1/o:, g(x) = n f (x) n l x - x �: l "'lc
(13.34)
1:= 1
if f(x) E H..\ ( (x �: , XJ: + l ]), k = 1, 2, . k = 1, 2, . . ; , n .
.
.,n
-
1,
A >
o:, and p(JJJ: + o:) < 1,
Proof. For x E [x�:, XJ: + l ] the function g(x ) has the form g(x) = ( x x �: ) -"'�c g l (x) + (x t+ l - x) -1-'�c + • g2 (x) , where Yi (x) E H>.([x�:, XJ: + l ]), i = 1 , 2. Then g(x)l�e[��c.��c + t] E /a [Lp (XJ:, XJ:+ I)] by Theorem 13.6 and its corollary. Therefore g(x) E /a (Lp (a, b)] as well, by the Theorem 13.11 on sewing. •
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
238
13.4. Characterization of fractional integrals of Holderian functions We continue now the investigations started in §§ 3.1 and 3.2, where it was shown that fractional integration improves the Holderian properties of functions by an order (see Theorems 3. 1-3.3} . In this subsection we shall prove the statements of the converse character by showing that fractional derivatives are defined on all Holderian functions of order A (with a weight ) and are themselves Holderian functions of order A After this we shall prove the main assertion of this subsection which states that fractional integration realizes an isomorphism, i.e. a continuous one-to-one mapping, of the weighted Holder space HG(p) onto n; + cx(p). Namely, let
a
>a
a.
-
n
p(x) = -
00
IT lx - Xk jllk . k
( 13.35}
=l
< a � Xt < X2
1
• • •
< Xn � b <
00 .
The following theorem holds. Theorem 13.13.
Let p(x) be a weight ( 13.35) with Xt = a . If A + a < 1,
� JL t < A + 1 , A + a < J.l k < A + 1 , k = 2 , . . , n , 0
.
( 13.36}
then the operator I�+ isomorphically maps the space Ht(p) onto the space n;+cx(p). A similar assertion is valid for the operator I!�) , if Xn = b and A + a < 1 , 0 � Jln < A + 1, A + a < J.lk < A + 1, k = 1 , 2, . . . , n - 1.
( 13.37 }
The proof of the theorem is comparatively easy in the case of the weight p(x) = (x - a)ll and rather cumbersome for an arbitrary weight of the form (13.35).
To make the presentation simpler we split it up into several stages, providing a series of intermediate lemmas. The theorem will be first proved for the weight
p(x) = (x - a)ll.
We recall that the space Ht(p) consists of functions f E H >. (p) such that p(x)f(x) equals zero at the points Xk J k = 1 , 2, . . , n . .
§ 13. FUNCTIONS REPRESENTABLE BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Lemma 13.1. If / (z) E
239
H>.([a, b]), a < ..\ � 1, th en
( Daa+ /) ( z ) =
/(a)
1
r(1 - ) ( z - a)a a
+ 1/J (z),
where 1/J(z) E n>.- a ([a, b]) and 1/J(a) = 0, besides that 111/J I I n"-or � ell / l i n" -
Proof. In view of ( 13.2) and ( 1 . 16) it is sufficient to show that :c- a
J t - 1 - a (f(x) - f(x - t)]dt E H>.- a .
1/J 1 (z) =
0
We have :c - a
J [f(x) - f(x - t)]((t + h) -a- 1 - t -a- 1 ]dt
1/J1 (x + h) - 1/J l (x) =
0
0
- /(X - t) dt + J f(X +(t h)+ h) l+a
( 13.38)
-h
+
:c- a
J f(x(t++h)h)-l+f(x) a dt It + /2 + /3. =
0
It is easily seen that 00
J l it I ::; c t). l (t + h) -a- l - t -a- l l dt 0
where
=
c l h >. -a ,
c 1 = c J t>. l (t + 1) -a- l - t- a - l l dt < oo, and 00
0
0
I I2 I �
C
J (t + h)>.-a- l dt
-h
00
=
c2 h >.- a ,
J 1 13 1 � ch >. (t + h) -a- 1 dt = c3h >. -a . 0
240
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
It remains to note that
c J t>·-a- 1 dt . ,2: � (1
0
•
1P1 (a ) = 0 ,
which follows from the estimate
I 1P1 (z) l
�
By means of Lemma 13.1 we shall consider the case � + a > 1 in Theorem 3.1 which remained unproved until now. Let f E 1:+ cp, cp E H�((a, b]) , 0 < � � 1 , 0 < a < 1 , � + a > 1 . I t is sufficient t o consider the case cp( a ) = 0. In correspondence with Definition 1.6 we have to show that (d/dz)Pi+ cp E H� + a- 1 , i.e . that v! :; a cp E H�-( 1 -a) . Since � > 1 - a we see that cp(z) is representable by a fractional integral of order 1 - a in view of Theorem 13.5. Thus the Riemann Liouville fractional derivative V!+ a cp coincides with the Marchaud derivative - see Corollary of Theorem 13.1 . Since cp(a) = 0, Lemma 13. 1 yields what is required. Our next step is an extension of Lemma 13. 1 to the case of weighted Holderian functions. Lemma 13.2. Every function f(x) E H� +a (p), 0 < � < 1, 0 < � + a < 1, p(z) = (z - a)" , 0 � JJ < � + 1, is representable by a fractional integral f IC:+ cp, where cp E HS(p) and
=
( 13.39) Proof. Employing Theorem 13.4 we shall show first that f = IC:+ cp with cp E Lp for some p > 1. Then cp = D�+ f by Theorem 13.1 and ( 13.39) may be verified directly. Let us denote g(x) = (x - a) " f(x) E H� +a . Verifying the assumptions of Theorem 13.4 we see that f(x)f(x - a)0 = g(x)/(x - a)0 + 1' E Lp (a, b) provided that p(p - � ) < 1. Further, for a + c � x � b we have 1
1/Jc(x) = (z - a)"
J
x- a
+
£
Since l g(x) - g(z - t) l inequalities
[
J
x- a £
g(x) - g(x - t) dt t l +a
1 ] g(x - t) 1 (z - a)" - (x - a - t)" t l +a dt
� c 1 t.\ +a
and
lg(x - t)l � c2 (x - t - a).\ + a
we obtain the
§ 13. FUNCTIONS REPRESENTABLE BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
241
where the constants
Ca = c1
/
J1 t �- 1 dt,
1 C4 = c2 [(1 - t) - 11 - 1](1 - t)� - �� t - 1 - a dt 0
0
do not depend on c . Therefore (13.22) is satisfied if p(p - �) < 1, thus f = 1:+ cp, cp E Lp . It remains to verify (13.39). The function cp(x) has the form (13.2). The first term in (13.2) is in HG(p) and admits an estimate of the form (13.39) in view of the property (1.16) of Holderian functions. It remains to show that
z: - a J(z: J0 )�{�z: - t) dt E HG(p) and that 11 1/J IIH�(P) $ cllf iiH�+"' (p) · We set a = 0 for the sake of simplicity. Let us denote 1/Jo (x) = x11 1/J(x ) . To estimate the difference ,P0 (x + h) - 1/lo (x) we represent it in the form ,P (x) =
8
1/lo (x + h) - 1/Jo (x) = L A A: (x), A: = 1 where
A 1 (x) =
[1 - ( ) ] j0 g(x(x++hh)--y)gl(y)+a dy, z:+ h
-x- 11 x+h
A2 (x) = [(x + h) 11 - x 11]
z:+ h
- y-�� J (x(x++h)-�� h y) l + a g (y)dy, 0
_
( ) j g(x(x ++hh)- -y)gl+(y)a dy, z:
xAa(x) = x+h
IS
z:+ h
z:
As (x) =
J [g(x) - g(y)H(x + h - y) - 1 - a - (x - y)- 1 - a]dy, 0
z:
A6(x) = xi�
J g(y)(x- 11 - y- ll)[(x + h - y) - 1 - a - (x - y) - 1 - a]dy, 0
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
242
Estimation of every one of these terms leads to the inequality
We omit the calculations which are not difficult but take too much space; they are to a great extent similar to the steps in the proof of Theorem 3.3. The condition ,P(a) = 0 is easily checked. The lemma is thus proved. • The following COJ;"ollary results from Lemma 13.2 and the corollary of Theorem
13.1.
Corollary. The fractional Riemann-Liouville and Marchaud derivatives coincide for functions l(x) E n;+ 01(p) under the assumptions of Lemma 1 3.2. Comparison of Lemma 13.2 with Theorem 3.3 shows that Theorem 13.13 is proved for the weight p( x) = ( x - a ) The transformation a + b - x -+ x in Lemma 13.2 leads to the following lemma. �J .
Lemma 13.2' . Each function 0 A + 1, is representable
::5 I' <
c lllll n"+or (p) ·
l(x) E nt + 01(p), p(x) = (b - X )#J' 0 < A + a < 1, as I = Ib_ cp where cp(x) E H6(P) and ll cp ll n " (P) ::5
Before we extend Lemma 13.2 to the case of an arbitrary weight of the form (13.35), we prove two auxiliary assertions.
Assertion 1. If I = Ib_ cp, where cp E H6(p), A + A l' lt: < A + 1, k = 2 , 3 , . . . , n , p(x) is a weight
a < 1, A + a < p1 < A + 1 ,
(13.35) with X t = a , then � c and .,P E H (p) ll ll I = 1�+ 1/J, 'rP IIH" ( P) ::5 tr'IIH " (p) · This assertion follows immediately from (11.16) if we take into account boundedness of the singular operator S in the space H� (p) (see Theorem 1 1.1). Besides .,P = cos a1rcp + sin a1rr;;01 Sr� cp.
<
{On zero continuation of fractional integrals). Let f(x) = I:; + tr' on the interval [x; , x; + l ], where cp E H6 (r; ) on [x; , x; + t], r; (x) = j x - x; l #Ji l x Xj + l i #Ji+ l , j = 1, 2, . . . , n . Then the function
Assertion 2.
Xj ::5 X ::5 Xj + 1 1 l*(x) = f(x), a ::5 X < Xj 1 Xj + l < X ::5 b, 0,
{
is representable as f* (x) = /�+ cpl , where c,?t (x) E H6 (P) on [a , b] with the weight (13.35) if 0 ::5 1'1t: < A + 1, k = 1, . . . , j - 1, A + a < J.li + l < A + 1, A < l'k < A + 1, k = j, j + 2, . . , n , p(x); besides .
(13.40)
§ 13. FUNCTIONS REPRESENTABLE BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
243
A similar assertion has already been proved for the case of fractional integrals of Lp -functions. - see Theorem 13.10. Assertion 2 is proved following the same lines as in the proof of Theorem 13.10. We only indicate that similarly to (13.31)
0, X < Xj ,
l
and it is necessary to use Theorem Lemma 13.3.
11.1 while verifying (13.40).
Each function f(x) E Ht+ a (p) , A + a < 1, where
n p(x) = IT lx - X k l #'" , a = x 1 < < Xn � b, k= l 0 � JL 1 < A + 1, A + a < Jl k < A + 1, k = 2, . . . , n , · · ·
Let c t o b e an arbitrary point in the interval of Theorem 3.3' we set f(x) = !l (x) + /2 (x),
Proof.
{ () {
(a, x 2 ).
Similarly t o the proof
f(x), x � c, !l(x) = /(c) , x � c, 0, h x = f(x) - /(c), Xx �� c,
(13.41)
ll ft iiH ;\ +at ( p. ) � c ll fiiH ;\ +at ( P ) ' II /2 IIH ;\ +a ( p0) � c ll fiiH ;\+o( P ) '
(13.42)
C,
n (x - a)#' • , Po (x) = (x - a)>.+e TI lx - x k l #'" , 0 < e < 1. k=2 We note that introduction of the functions (13.41) is in a sense the main factor in the proof both of Theorem 3.3' and of the present theorem: it allows us where we denote Pa (x) =
CHAPTER 3. PROPERriES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
244
to separate the point z1 = a, which is the lower limit of integration, from the other points Zi, k = 2 , 3, . . . , n, where singularities are admitted. Everywhere below Zn+l = b in the case Zn < b. By Lemma 13.2 the representation ft (z) = 1:+ <1' 1 is valid with
ll f.Pt iiHA (p) � c ll f.P t ii H A ( p. ) � c ll ft ii H A+o(Pa ) � c ii/ II H! +o ( p) " To consider the function
where
f3t = � + c,
/2 (z), we introduce the following notation
c > a, {3" = J.l.k , k = 2,
. . . , n.
Let us show that ( 13.43)
where 'f/J�c E HG(rk ) on Zn < b) and
[z�c, Z k +t ], k =
1, 2, . . . , n - 1,
tPn E H6(Pn ) on [zn , b)
11 '1/J�c ii H A (r,. ) � c ll f2IIH A+o(r,. ) , 11 '1/Jn ii HA ( p" ) � c ll f2 11 HA+ o(p ,. ) ·
( if
( 13.44)
/2 (z) on [zn , b) this fact follows from Lemma 13.2. For the intervals [zi, Zi + t ], k = 1 , . . . , n - 1 , let us arbitrary choose a point c" E (z�c , zk +t ) and set /2 (z) = A �l (z) + ���l (z), where
For
Since ���l(z) E H� + a (p�c) on [z�c , z k +d we have 13.2, where 'f/Ji1 > (z) E H6(Pk ) C HG(rk ), and
���2(z )
=
1:,.+ 'f/Ji1)
by Lemma
( 13.45)
§ 13. FUNCTIONS REPRESENTABLE BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Further, since ����(z) E n; + a (Pk + l ) on [z k , Z k + l ] we obtain by Lemma 13.2', where 1Pl2) (z) E H6(Pk +t ) C H6(rk ), and
245
���;(z) = I;• +•- 1Pl2)
II 1P�2) IIHA (r• ) � c ll /��i iiH A +o ( P•+t ) � c llf2 11 HA+o (r• ) · Applying Assertion 1 (see above) to the function �� �2 we find that ���2 where ;j;l2) E H6(rk ) on [zk , zk + d and
( 13.46)
= I;. + ;j;�2) , ( 13.47)
Thus we arrive at ( 13.43) with 1Pk = 1Pk1) + �l2) . The norm inequality (13.44) is an immediate consequence of the estimates (13.45)-(13.47). Further, in view of Assertion 2 the function /i,l: ( z), which is the continuation by zero of the function h ( z ) beyond the interval [x k , x k + t ] , is representable by a fractional integral J;, k = Pi+ cpk , where cpk E H6(Po ) on [a, b] and
llc{)k ll HA (po ) � const 11 1Pk i iHA ( • ) k = 1, . . . , n - 1; llc{)n ii HA (po ) � const 111Pk ii HA ( p ) r
'
,.
Hence
/2 = I:+ lf'2
with
Cf'2 =
(13.42) we obtain the inequality
Let us show now that
( 13.48)
·
n
cp ( x) E H$(po ) k=l k 2:
and by ( 13.48), (13.44) and
Cf'2 (x) E H6(p) on [a, b] and ( 13.49)
Noting that /2 (x) = 0 for x � c and recalling the equation Cf'2 (x) = D�+ /2 we see that Cf'2 (x) = 0 for x � c (see (13.2) for the Marchand fractional derivative). Hence (13.49) follows, which in view of ( 13.48), leads in its turn to the inequality lllf'2 11 HA ( p) � const l l f ii HA+o (p) · The lemma is thus proved. The statement of Theorem 13.13 follows now from Theorem 3.4 and Lemma 13.3 . •
246
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
13.5. Fractional integration in the union of weighted Holder spaces Theorem 13.13 characterizes mapping properties of fractional integration in Holder spaces with a power weight in the case when the Holderian exponent � and exponents of the weight are fixed. Besides this, another result is of interest in applications which reveals mapping properties of fractional integration in spaces of Holderian functions with non-fixed exponents, i.e. in the union of all spaces H >. (p ) . We mean unification both in respect to � and to weight. Let us give corresponding notations for such unions. By H* = H*(a, b) we denote the space of functions which are Holderian ( of any order) in the open interval (a, b) and have integral singularities at the end points of the interval. More exactly, this space is defined by the following definition.
The space H* = H*(a, b) is a set of all functions f(x), for which there exist numbers �' 0 < � � 1, and ct > 0, c2 > 0 such that
Definition 13.1.
(13.50) where f*(x) E H >. ([a, b]). The space H* is well known as a class of functions widely used in the theory of singular integral equations - Muskhelishvili [1] - and is sometimes called the Muskhelishvili class. For convenience we introduce also the notation
H� (ct , c2) = {/ : f(x) = (x - a y 1 -1 (b - x y2 -1 g(x),
g(x) E H \ [a, b]), g(a) = g(b) = 0 }
( 13.51)
for the familiar weighted Holder space with fixed exponents. By simple arguments the equation
H* = U H� (ct , c2) = 0 <>. <1 £;>0
U
O<>. < >.o 0 <£;
H�(ct , c2),
(13.52)
is established, where 0 �o :::; 1 and d( � ) is an arbitrary positive number. We shall need also the following union of functions, which are Holderian of order more than n :
<
a<>. < >.o 0<£ ; <-d( >. )
( 13.53)
§ 13. FUNCTIONS REPRESENTABLE BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
247
1, d{..\) 0. where �o We shall use the spaces H * and H; in § 30 concerning applications to integral equations of the first kind. We shall give now the equivalent characterization of the space H� and show that fractional integration maps H * onto H�. First we need to introduce auxiliary spaces by the following definition.
a< <
>
We say that f(z) E Ha , if f(z) E C([a, b]) and f(z) is Holderian of order .,\ > a beyond the end points z = a and z = b:
Definition 13.2.
1/{z) - f(x + h)l � c(z) lhl.x,
> o: , x, x + h E {a , b),
,\
{ 13.54)
where c(z) may grow as z -+ a, z -+ b, but so that c(x) � const (z - a)- a (b - z) a -
.
We say that f(z) E; if a , if f(z) is Holderian of order .,\ > a within the open interval (a, b) and for z -+ a has the form
Definition 13.3.
/{z) = f(a) + g(x)(z - a) - a ,
{ 13.55)
where g(z) E H.x([a, b]), .,\ > a, and g(a) = 0, similar behaviour being assumed for z -+ b. The spaces ifa and if a coincide with each other. Proof. . Let f(z) E ifa· Taking a = 0 and /{a) = 0 we g(z)(z - a) a with g E H.\ that
Lemma 13.4.
I
find for
-
/(z) =
1/(z) - f(z + h) l �(z + h) - a lg(x + h) - g(x) l + lg(x)lx- a (x + h) - a [(x + h) a - xa ]. Hence the estimate 1 /(z + h) - f(x) l � cx - a l h l.x is obtained by simple steps if we take into accou�t that lg( x) I � cz.x. Similarly the required estimate is obtained for z -+ b, so that if a � Ha . Conversely, let f(x) E Ha . Then for x -+ 0 we have ( 13.56) Letting here h
-+ -z , we have 1 /(z) - /{0) 1 � cz .\- a .
( 13.57)
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
248
Then g(z) = z a [/(z) - / (0)] E H � ([a , b]).
( 13.58)
Indeed, g(z + h) - g(z) = [(z + h)a - za][/(z + h) - / (0)] + [/(z) + h) - /(z)]z a . Hence by ( 13.56) and ( 13.57) we obtain the inequality lu(z + h) - g(z)l � c(z + h) � -a l(z + h) a - z a l + ch \ h 0, which gives the assertion ( 13.58) after simple estimates. This �rtion together with a similar consideration of the case z -+ b shows that Ha � if a · • We shall give in terms of the space ifa = if a an equivalent characterization of the space (13.53) . The following lemma is valid.
>
Lemma 13.5.
The space H� consists of functions of the fonn /(z)
where 0 < c 1 < 1 - a,
0
f* (x) = (z - ap-a-£t (b - xp-a - £� '
( 13.59)
< c2 < 1 - a and f* (x) E Ha .
The �roof is obtained by direct verification on the basis of the definition of the space ii a .
Finally, the mapping properties of the operators I:+ , I6_ of fractional integration in the space H* is thoroughly characterized by the following theorem.
The fractional integration operator of order a, one-to-one onto the space H� :
Theorem 13. 14.
H*
0
< a < 1, maps ( 13.60)
Proof.
By Theorem 13.13 we have
provided that A +
a < 1, 0 < < 1 - a - A, i = 1 , 2 . Then C" i
u
0<�< 1 a 0< £ ; < 1 --a - �
which in view of (13.52) and (13.53) is nothing else but equation (13.60) for the operator I:+ . By similar arguments the case of the operator I6_ is considered.
§ 13. FUNCTIONS REPRESENTABLE BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
249
1-3.6. Fractional integrals and derivatives of functions with a prescribed continuity modulus The investigation carried out in § 13.4 can be significantly developed if, instead of Holderian functions, we admit spaces of functions such that
= O
E(
where w(h) is a given continuous increasing function, with w(O) = 0. We denote the space of all such functions by Hw = Ilw ([a, b]) and equip it with the norm ll
+ h>O
consists of functions equal to zero for x = a. The space H>. of usual Holderian functions corresponds to the power case w(t) = t>. . The function w(t) is sometimes called a characteristic function or the characteristic of a generalized Holderian space nw. What are the mapping properties of the fractional integration in the space H"'? Theorem 13.13 states that I:+ (H>. 0) = n; +a , 1. May one obtain a similar assertion
+
,\ + a <
(13.61)
a priori assumption that wa (t) = t aw(t), and for what kind of characteristic w(t) is (13.61) true? We shall answer these questions and outline the more general with
weighted situation as well. The idea of an almost decreasing function f(t) which is used below, means that f(t t ) � c/2 (t 2 ) for all t 1 � t 2 , where c does not depend on t 1 and t 2 . Similarly an almost increasing function is defined. The following two theorems give estimates which might be called Zygmund types by analogy with the Zygmund estimate known in the theory of singular integrals and estimating the continuity modulus w(H
W
(
[0a
+
f W (
b-a C
h
h
is valid.
(l-a
t.
= 0. For a (13.62)
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
250
We use (3.4) for the difference f(x + h) - f(x) of the function f(x) = Ic;+ 'P· Let us estimate the summands J1 , J2 and Ja in (3.4). We have: l lt I � cw(
Proof.
+
I Jd � cw (cp, x - a)(x - a)" x - a) h . < c w(
[ (I + X : a r - 1]
( 13.63)
l
Since b-a
J h
w(r.p, t)dt > t 2 -a -
b-a
J
x-a
�c it follows from
w(r.p, t)dt > w(
J t2-a
x-a
w(
�
'
b-a (13.63) that l lt I $ ch J w��.:.tldt . h
j
b-a
Further,
j h
h
I J2 I � (h - t) a- 1 lr.p(x + t) -
0
1 w(
( 13.64)
0
1
with � = J(1 0
2) x - a $
- €) a- 1 d{.
To estimate
h. In the first case 1
J
J3 we distinguish the cases 1) x - a � h and
+
+ j ta- 2w(
I Jal � h a ltcx - 1 - (t l) a- 1 lw(
+ j
b- a . a $ ch w(
xha
§ 13. FUNCTIONS REPRESENTABLE BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
251
Obviously in the second case
(13.65) Estimates for Jt , J2 , Ja lead to (13.62) if we take into account the fact that ho:w(
w(f, t) W ( D o:a+ f, h) � C f + dt t1 0
o:
(13.66)
provided that the integral on the right-hand side converges. We begin by noting that the function the estimate
Proof.
F(z) = 't��-a)Sa) , 0 < a < 1, admits
h
t) w(F, h) � c f w(f, tl +o: dt.
( 13.67)
0
Let us prove ( 13.67).
Taking h > 0, we have F(z + h) - F(z) [/(z) /(a)][(z + h - a) - o: - (z - a) - o:] + (z + h - a) - o:[f(x + h) - f(x)] = A 1 + A2 . Hence h I A2 I � (z + h - a) - o:w(f, h) � h - o:w(f, h) � c J t - 1 - o:w(f, t)dt ; - here in the. last 0 inequality we made use of the fact that the function t - 1 w(f, t) almost decreases, see e.g. Guseinov and Muhtarov [1, p.50]. Further, again taking this decreasing into account, for A 1 when z - a � h we have
X- 4
� c J t - 1 - o:w(/, t)dt 0
h
� c J t - 1 - o:w(f, t)dt. 0
z - a � h, the mean value theorem yields the estimate I A 1 1 � ch(z h a) - 1 - o:w(f, z - a) � ch - o:w(f, h) � c J t - 1 - o:w(f, t)dt. Gathering estimates for A 1 0 and A2 we obtain the inequality (13.67).
When
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
252
To prove the theorem, it is sufficient in view of (13.67) to consider only the second summand in the expression (13.2) for the Marchand fractional derivative, i.e. the function (13.10). For this function we have
r(1 - a) [,P(z + h) - 1/J(z)] Q
z:-a
= J [f(z + h) - f(z + h - t) - f(x) + f(x - t)]t - 1 - a dt 0
+
•7-•[f(z: + h) - f(z: + h - t)]cl-<'dt = B1 + B2 • z:- a
If x - a �
h,
we have
then
z:- a
h
0
0
I B1 I � 2 I w(f, t)t - 1 -adt � 2 I t - 1 - aw(f, t)dt. h
t)dt I B1 I -< 2 1 w(f, t 1 +a + 2 0
�2
If x - a �
h,
I B2 I
�
z:-a
J w(f,t1+ah) dt h
h
J0 t - 1 -aw(f, t)dt + 2a - 1 h- aw(/, h) h
� (2 + 4/ a) t - 1 -a w(f, t)dt. J
0
As for
h
B2 ,
we have
I B2 I
�
h
z: + h a -
Ia t - 1 - a w(f, t)dt.
z:-
If
x-a � h
then
2 I t - 1 -aw(f, t)dt � 2 1 -a I t - 1 -aw(f, t)dt. If x a � h, after the substitution 0 0 t = e + X - a and taking into account the (almost) decreasing nature of the function t - 1 w(f, t), we have -
h
X - a + e) de I B2 1 -< J w(f, (x - a + ep + cx 0
§ 13. FUNCTIONS REPRESENTABLE BY FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
253
·�athering estimates for B1 and B2 we arrive at (13.66). The theorem is thus proved. • To formulate an assertion of the form (13.61) we shall introduce a space of functions in terms of which we shall give conditions for the admissible characteristic function w(t). Definition 13.4.
We say that w(t) E �� , {3 '?_ 0, 6 '?_ 0,
if
(13.68)
1) w(t) is continuous on [0, b - a), w(O) = 0 and w(t) almost increases; t 6 � 2) I ( f ) w � de � cw (t), 0 6 -a
3) I t
(t)
{J
� de � cw (t)
The space �� may be called a two-parameter space of Bari-Stechkin type (compare with Bari-Stechkin class �p , see e.g. Guseinov and Muhtarov [1], p.78). It may be shown that the space �� is empty for 6 '?_ {3, so we assume that 0
< 6 < {3.
Let 0 < a < 1 and w(t) E �� · Then the operator 1:+ maps the space H� isomorphically onto the space -aH�"' with the characteristic Wa (t) = t aw(t). Theorem 13.17 is deduced from the Zygmund type estimates used in Theorems 13.15 and 13.16 and from the fact that the functions f E H't"' under the above assumptions on w(t) are representable by fractional integrals f = 1:+ lfl of functions l(J E H� . The latter is proved by means of Theorem 13.2 or 13.3. The proof is easy and is left to the reader. Consider also the similar Theorem 19.8 concerning Theorem 13.17.
the periodic case where such representability in an analogous situation is shown in more detail. Finally we observe that there is an extension of the above results to the case of weighted spaces. Namely, let H�(p) be a space of functions /(z) such that p(z)/(z) E H't , II / IIH0 (p) = IIPI IIHO' · For p(z) = (z ...., a)", 0 � JJ < 2 - a , the Zygmund type estimate (13.62) in the case of functions lfJ(z ) , such that p(z)lfJ(z ) satisfies the assumptions of Theorem 13.14, is replaced by the estimate
w (plaa+ r' h) -< cha+-y - 1 tf')
h
b -a
f w (plfJ, t)dt + ch f w (t2-alfJ , t) dt ' 0
t"Y
h
where 1 max(l , p ). The following theorem is also valid.
p
(13.69)
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
254
Let 0 < a < 1, p(z) = (z - a)ll, 0 � p < 2 - a. If with 6 = max(l' - 1, 0), then the operator I:+ maps the space H�(p) isomorphically onto the space H�"'(p) with the same weight and with the characteristic wa (t) = t aw(t):
Theorem 13. 18.
w (t) E �t- a
(13.70) The proof of this theorem may be found in Murdaev and Samko [1-3] , where
the case of the weight and Murdaev [1].
p(z) = (x - a) 11 (b - z)"
is also considered - see also Samko
§ 14. Miscellaneous Results for Fractional Integro Differentiation of Functions of a Real Variable In this section we shall consider various aspects of fractional calculus in real variable function theory, which were not treated in the previous sections. The main aspects are: 1) the mapping properties of fractional integration in the spaces of functions which satisfy the Holder condition in Lp-norm; 2) fractional differentiability of functions which are absolutely continuous with a weight; 3) the Riesz mean value theorem and the Kolmogorov type inequality for fractional integrals and derivatives; 4) the connection with the summation of series and integrals.
14. 1 . Lipschitz spaces n; and ii; Let wp (f, 6) be the integral continuity modulus (13.24) of a function f(x ), which is given on [a , b] and is continued as identical zero beyond the interval [a, b]. Definition 14.1. We say that f(x) E H; = H; ([a, b]), where 0 < ,\ � 1, if /(z) E Lp(a, b) and wp (/, 6) � co>. . If as well wp (/, 6) = o(o >. ) as 6 0, we say that f(z) E h; = h;( [a, b]). The spaces H; an d h; are usually called Lipschitz spaces, the space H; being -f.
sometimes designated as lip(..\, p)).
We consider some properties of functions in H; . The Hardy-Littlewood imbedding theorem in the space H; will be stated. Initially we interpret Definition
255
§ 14. MISCELLANEOUS RESULTS
14.1 by stressing that it implies the estimates b-6
J lf(x + 6) - f(x) IPdx � c6>.P ,
(14.1)
a
b
a+6
J lf(x) IPdx � c6>.p
J lf(x) IPdx � c6>.p ,
and
a
b-6
6>
0.
( 14.2)
The Lipschitz space might be defined by ( 14.1) only, i.e. without worrying about zero continuation of a function f ( x ) beyond [a, b]. Such a space will be denoted by ii;:
so that H; C ii; . Similarly the space h.; is introduced, if 0 ( 6>.P ) in (14.3) is replaced by o( 6>.P ) . The spaces ii; and H; are equipped with the norms 1 1 /I I.HA•
=
I I / Il P
+
sup
0< 6
6 - >.
{
b- 6
J l f(x + 6) - f(x) IPdx
{ (j + j) a
a+cS
1 1 / I I HPA
=
1 1 /I I .HPA
+
sup
O< cS < b - a
6->.
a
b
b-6
_,
} }
lf ( x ) IPdx
1 /p ,
( 14.4) 1 /P ,
( 14.4')
so n; and H; become Banach spaces. We note that H>. -+ n; for 1 � p < oo and H>. -+ Ht for 1 � p � 1/A. The imbedding H6 -+ H; is also valid for all 1 � p < oo, where H6 = H6([a, b]) is the space of Holderian functions vanishing at the points x = a, x = b. (We denote a continuous imbedding of Banach spaces X and Y by X -+ Y). It may be verified directly that ( x - a) �' E H; and ( x - a) �' E ii; if and only if I' � A - 1/p in the case 0 < A < 1 , and I' > A - 1/p in the case A = 1 . A natural question arises. I f f( x) E H; , does the smoothness of the function f ( x ) of the "order" A lead to the fact that f ( x ) E Lr with r > p? And if this is so, does f ( x ) have a smoothness in Lr-norm, i.e. is an imbedding H; -+ Hf possible? The answer to this question is given by the following Hardy-Littlewood theorem, though its proof is omitted, see references in § 17. 1 (note to § 14.1).
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
256
If Ap � 1, then n; -+ Hf and n; -+ Hf in the case 1 � p � r-1/P < where = p/(1 - Ap) and JJ = A - 1/p + 1/r. If Ap > 1, then n; -+ H� and n; -+ n>- -1/P . Here imbedding in the space of continuous functions in the case Ap > 1 is understood as usual up to the equivalence of functions. We note that Theorem 14.1 yields the following corollary. Corollary. Functions f(z) E n; or n; are integrable to the power p with a weight: P dz � cl fl n;' fb - l f(z)! (14.5) (x a)"P (b - x) "P where II < A for f(x) E n; and II < A � 1/p for f(x) E n; . Indeed, if Ap � 1, by imbedding n; Lr , p $ r < p/(1 - Ap), we have (r-p)/r i ( -���::�:� )"P � I /IlL { i [(:r a)(b �:)]"•P/(r-p) } $ cl f l �� under the additional choice pj(11 - 11p) < r < p/(1 - ..\p). If ..\p > 1, by Theorem 14.1 we see that lf(z) l � c(x - a)>.-1 /P as x -+ a and similarly as b, that the validity of (14.5) becomes evident.
Theorem 14. 1. q,
q
a
-+
:r
_
:r
p
x -+
so
14.2. Mapping properties of fractional integration in H;
I:+
n;
We shall show that fractional integration maps the space into n;+ a in a if, roughly speaking, we step aside from the left end-point the case = If we wish to consider what occurs right up to the point = then n; + a - e , c > 0 - see Theorem 14.3. We first consider the simpler case 1:+ = 0 , when we can prove a mapping theorem for from H� = into on cf. Theorem 3.6). the whole interval
A+ < 1 x a, z a. : n; -+ A I:+ Lp n; [a, b] ( Theorem 14.2. Operators I:+ and I6_ , 0 < a $ 1, are bounded from Lp (a,b) into ii;([a ,b]) for any p � 1 and into n;([a ,b]), if 1 $ p < 1/a. Proof. Let /(z) = f(a)I;r+
§ 14. MISCELLANEOUS RESULTS
inequality
257
(1.33), we obtain
(T
l/(z + 6) - /(z)l'dz 6
)
l/p
j
j [ta-l - (t
0
0
� llcpllp (6 - t) a - l dt + llcpllp
so 11/ll n: � cllcpllp · To estimate the norm 11 /ll n: for conditions (14.2). We have
(!
) (I I � I (! 1 /p
a+6
1/ (z)l'dz
6
6) a-l ]dt
1 � p < 1/a we need to verify
t a- !
dz
=
+
�
6
i 'f'(>: + a - t)dtl'dz
1 � p < oo , - see Theorem b
17.2
in connection with this estimate.
f 1 /(z) IPdz by the Hardy inequality
b- 6
J(6) < 6ap in the case p
> 1. If p = 1, then
b-6
J(6) �
J
b-6
•
(14.7)
Further, for J(6) =
j lcp(t)ldt j(z - t)a- l dz � c6a llcpllp , b
which completes the proof.
>0
d1,
1 /(z) IPdz < el l cp P (b - Z ) ap - lip
(z - t) a - l dz +
b-6
Q
1 /p
(3.18) we have
b
j lcp(t) ldt j a
b
) )
p 1 /p
6
ta - l
from whence
(14.6)
b-a
b-6
b
t
258
6 b 1/(z)IPdz c6 P J b..,...6 b
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Remark 14.1. If / (z) =
a+ I:+ cp, a > 0, cp E Lp , then Ja 1/(z) IP dz � c601P for all
1 � p < oo. Similarly, if f = I:_cp, a > 0, cp E Lp, then � 01 for all 1 � p < oo. These estimates for I:+ in the neighborhood of the point and for If_ in the neighborhood of the point a hold for 1 � p < 1/ a only. This is justified by taking cp(z) = 1. fi; --+ n a - 1/P
given by Theorem 14.1 is a strengthening of Theorem 3.6, which states that
Remark 14.2. In view of the imbedding
a > 1/p, Theorem 14.2 I:+ : Lp --+ n a - 1 /P for a > 1/p.
for
Theorem 14.3. Let 1 � p < oo, A + a < 1. Then the operator I:+ realizes the following continuous mappings:
(14.8)
JOt
fi;([a, b]) � fi; + a - e {[a, b]), 1 � p � 1/A.
{14.9 )
Also if cp E n; and the estimate
fb
6
lcp(z ) I P dz < c6< � +a - 1)p (x - a)(1 - a)p a+
{14.10)
holds as well, then I:+ cp E fi; + 01 ([a, b]) and satisfies the former of the conditions (14.2). To estimate the difference /{z + 6) - f(x) with f(x) = f(a)I:+ cp, we shall use representation (3.4): f(x 6) - f(x) = J1 + J2 + J3, where the summands J1 , J2 and J3 are given by their expressions in (3.4) with g(t) being replaced by cp(t) and h by 6. We have
Proof.
+
{ !b-6!J, !P } 1/p � I6 (0 - w- 'dt { !b-6 X + t) -
!'I'(
�J
p
0
1
p
§ 14. MISCELLANEOUS RESULTS
259
Further
{! IJal"d:r}1/p { I d:r I [
b
z:
=
b-a
� c ll
I tA[t a- 1 - (t + 6) a-1 ]dt 0
= c ll
(b- a)/ 6
I 0
tA[ta- 1 - (t + 1) a-1 ]dt � c 1 6A+ a ll
Complications connected with the left end-point are caused by the summand We have
J1 .
( 14.11)
where c 1 does not depend on (14.8) is proved.
6 but depends on a 1 , and c 1 -+ oo as a 1 -+ a.
Thus
To obtain (14.9) we shall give such estimates in (14.11), which cover the left end-point z = a. Using the inequality (1 + y) a - 1 � cy(1 + y ) a- 1 , we obtain
{
Since
b -6
Ia
1/p } { P c6 I J I dz 1
-<
b
l
} 1/p
(z - a + 6) (1 -a )p � (z - a)( A - e )p 6{ 1 - A -a +e )p , where 0 < e < min(A, 1 - A - a),
CHAPTER 3. PROPERI'IES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
260
by (14.5) we have
{ f IPdz } 6-6
IJ1
1 /p
{f 6
< c6>.. +cr -�
_
G
G
I V'(z) IP dz (z a)C>.. - �)P _
}
1 /p
- . < c1 6>..+ cr- � IIUJII r H:
_
Let now tp E n; and let (14.10) be satisfied. The summand J1 is estimated follows:
as
The application of (14. 10) completes the estimate, so that P;+ V' E n; +cr ([a, b]) . As for the former of the conditions (14.2) for f = I�+ tp, this is easily verified directly. • Remark 14.3. Similarly to Corollary of Theorem 3.6 it may be shown that
Theorem 14.3 holds for the spaces h;
1:+
as
well. It may be shown also that Theorem
14.2 holds in the form Lp(a, b) ----+ h;([a 1 1 b]), a 1 > a. It follows from Theorem 13.5 that functions in the space n; , representable by fractional integrals of the order a of Lp -functions:
� > a , are (14. 12)
Verification of the condition (13.22) more accurately than in Theorem 13.5
} !6-a � { ! if(z + JtL l tfo, (z) l" dz 6
1 /p
b-t
:5
tl a
t) -
} f(z) IPdz
1 /p
,
§ 14. MISCELLANEOUS RESULTS
shows also that, by Theorem
261
13.4, (14.13)
We make imbedding (14.13) more exact by giving the following theorem.
Let /(z) E n;([a, b]), � > a, 1 < p < 1/a. Then /(z) = D �+ f E n; - a ([a, b]), if � � 1/p and cp(x) - rN��)(:c!a)o E .H; - a ([a, b]), if � > 1/p. Proof of this theorem imitates estimates in the proof of Lemma 13.1 with the only difference that the summands It , l2 and Ia in the representation (13.38) are Theorem 14.4. I:+ tp, where tp =
to be estimated now not in the uniform norm, but in Lp -norm by means of the Minkowsky inequality (1.33). The corresponding steps are not difficult and will be omitted. We should take into account the fact that (z - a)- a E .H;- a only if � :5 1/p. Corollary.
functions
Equation (2.64) of fractional integration by parts as valid for the
14.3. Fractional integrals and derivatives of functions which are given on the whole line and belong to n; on every finite interval �
We consider now functions cp(z ) , given on the whole real line, and study the behaviour of fractional integration I+ in terms of the spaces H; in the case when information on H;-behaviour of functions tp and f is local, while the fractional integral under consideration has an infinite limit of integration. Such a statement of the question allow us to avoicf the influence of end-points of the interval compare Theorems 14.6 and 14.7 with Theorems 14.3 and 14.4. The fractional integral will be considered to be conventionally convergent: lim I+a tp = f{a)1 N-oo --
cp(t)dt
J (z - t) l -a · :1:
:e-N
(14.14)
This interpretation of the integral is necessary when we admit functions cp(t), which do not necessarily vanish at infinity (in particular they may be periodic). Thus existence of the limit (14.14) in Theorem 14.5-14.7 below will be postulated. Below,
CHAPTER
262
PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
(14.14) does exist and is conventionally2 convergent on 11" 211"-periodic functions under the choice N = 21rn, n = 0, 1, 2, . . . , if I
in §
19,
3.
we shall see that
0
Theorem 14.5.
the condition
Let n be an arbitrary interval with a length I and let
j l
n
oo,
(14.15)
where c = c(l) does not depend on location of n, and let f(x) = I+
bj lf(x) - f(x + h) jPdx a
=
o(haP ) ,
h ---+ 0,
<
1,
(14.16)
for every interval [a, b] with a length lb - al � I. :r:-dh :r:-Nh I + I = It + Proof. We have r (a)/(x) = -ooI:r: cp(t )(x - t ) a -l dt = :r:-dhI:r: +:r:-Nh - oo on. Let /2 + /3, where d > 0 and N > 0 are constants, which will be chosen later t1.f = f(x) - f(x + h) . It is sufficient to show that
Jb lt1.f2IP dx = o(hap )
( 14.17)
b lt1.ft IP dx � chap, b lt1.faiP dx � chap
( 14.18)
a
for all fixed
d and N and that
j a
for all
0<
j a
h � 1 and sufficiently small d and sufficiently large N. We have :r:-dh
t1.f2 = j (x - t ) a-l [
=
:r:-dh
O(ha - l ) j l
§ 14. MISCELLANEOUS RESULTS
263
Hence b
b
J l�f2 1P dx :5 chap- 1 J dx a
a
:5 chap - 1
x - dh
J
lcp(t) - cp(t + h) IP dt
x - Nh
b - dh
J
lcp(t) - cp(t + h) IP dt
a - Nh
= c 1 h ap
b - dh
J
t+Nh
J
dx
(14.19)
t+dh
lcp(t) - cp(t + h) IP dt.
a - Nh
It follows from (14.15) that cp(t), cp(t + h) E L,(a - Nh, b - dh) for fixed d and N, and sufficiently small h. Then (14.19) yields (14.17) in view of (1.34). To obtain the former of the inequalities (14.18), it is sufficient to prove that
J l !l(x) IPdx :5 chap and similarly for ft (x - h). We have b
a
: (f
� (d )"
b
a - dh
in view of (14.15),
i f(t) IP dt)
d being chosen sufficiently small.
1/p
�
b
The integral f l ft(x - h) IPdx a
is estimated similarly. Finally,
�/3 =
Taking
oo
J
cp(x - t)[t a - 1 - (t - h) a-1]dt +
Nh+h
(14.15) into account we have
� e 1 1P h "
Nh+h
J
Nh
cp(x - t)t a-1 dt
264
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS 00
� cha J [(t - l) a - 1 - t a- l ]dt � g l/p h a , N+ l if N is chosen sufficiently large. Further,
Hence, using (14.15) we obtain the estimate
(Ja I I2 IPdx) 1IP � cNa- t ha � g l/p ha , if b
N is sufficiently large, which completes the proof. •
Let f(x) = li-r.p exist as the limit (14.14) for almost all x and let r.p(x), r.p(x - h) E Lp(a, b) for some a and b. If
Theorem 14.6.
j lr.p(x) - r.p(x - h) IP dx b
�
ch>.P ,
(14.20)
a
1 � p � oo , 0 < A < 1,
then for the same a and b b
j lf(x) - f(x - h) jP dx � c1 M>.+a)p , a
with c1 depending only on c.
A + a < 1,
(14.21)
§ 14. MISCELLANEOUS RESULTS
265
Proof. For A/ = f(x) - f(x - h) we have 00
f(a)A/ = J (
-j (
0
Simple estimates lead to
j
00
::; C t >- [(t + h) cx - 1 - t cx - 1 ]dt = c1 h>. + cx . 0
Similarly
which proves the theorem.
•
In the following theorem the Marchaud fractional derivative is treated limit in the space Lp (a, b):
as
a
(14.22) where
D+. ,c/ is the truncated Marchaud fractional derivative (5.59).
Theorem 14.7.
Let f(x),
-oo
< x < oo
satisfy the condition (14.15). If
j 1/(z) - f(x - h) IPd:z: ::; ch>.p , b
a
0 < a < .\ < 1,
(14.23)
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
266
then the limit (14.22) exists. If besides this
bj-dlf(x) - f(x - h) IP dx � ch>-P , a-d
(14.24)
for all sufficiently small d > 0 with a constant c, not depending on d, then
bj lcp(x) - cp(x - h) IPdx a
�
ch( >.-a)p ,
D + f·
(14.25)
Proof. First we note that Dt. ,e f E Lp(a,b), which may be easily obtained by using (14.15) applied to the function /, and (14. 2 3). Let us show the sequence
= Di- ,e f to be fundamental in Lp (a, b). For c- 1
< c- 2 we have
b! jcp, , (z) - cp,, (x) i'dx ::; !b dx (�1:2 1/(z) - f(x - t) jra- ldt) p
<
l/(z ) - f(x - t)jra - • - lfp t • - ! fp'
dz
where {J > 0; in view of
o( l)
dt) P
J U. Qr�+••' dtr-l (j dzJ lt<x> - t<x - t) i•r•a- l-•'dt) . (14.26) =
(14.23) we see that (14.26) is dominated by
b
1:2 t:1
jf: 2 t -pa- l -p6 dt j lf(x) - f(x - t) IPdx = j tp(>.-a-6)- l dt
t:1
under the choice 0 <
a
6 < � - a.
o( l)
Thus existence of the limit
= o( l )
(14.22) is established.
§ 14. MISCELLANEOUS RESULTS
Further, for
267
VJ = D �./ we have
r(1 - a) [ - - h)] = [/(z - t)
h
00
+ j [f(z) - /(z - h)]t -a- 1 dt h
h
+ J [f(x ) - f(x - t)]t -a- 1 dt 0
Simple estimates with application of {14.20) give
b(! llt l"dx) 1/p $ ![(t - h)- l-a - r '-a)dt (! lf(x - h) - f(x - t) IPdx) 1/p b
00
�
J [(t - h) - 1 - a - t - 1-a](t - h)>. dt = c1 h>.- a . 00
C
h
The estimate for 12 is evident, while for /3 we obtain
b(! IIaiPdx) 1/p $ I r'-adt (! lf(x) - f(x - t)IPdx) 1/p $ ch�-a h
by
b
(14.23), which completes the proof. •
Remark 14.4. We have restricted ourselves to 0-form in Theorems
It is not difficult to show that they are true in o-form too.
14.6 and 14.7.
14.4. Fractional derivatives of absolutely continuous functions It was established earlier - Lemma 2.2 - that absolutely continuous functions /(z) have fractional derivatives of order a E {0, 1) almost everywhere and admit equations (2.24)-(2.25). Here we shall extend these assertions to a wider space of functions:
/* {z) /(z) = (z a)�"(b x) v , _
_
Jl , v E [0, 1 - a) ,
{ 14.27)
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
268
where l • (z) E AC([a, 6]).
Functions of the fonn {L/. 27} are representable by a fractional integral I = I:+
Theorem 14.8.
Proof. For the sake of simplicity we restrict ourselves t o the c ase v = 0, the general z
case being reducible to this. Since l• (z) E AC([a, b]), then l• (z) = l• (a) + f 1/J(t)dt,
where 1/J (t) E £ 1 . Since the function l• (a)(z - a ) - JS is representable as a fractional integral of the function const (z - a)- v -a E L 1 it remains for us to show that the (J
function set
:c
(z - a)-JS f t/J(t)dt is representable as it is
required in the theorem. We
(J
z
j
A(z, s) = :z
'
and verify the equality
(14.28) (J
(J
We make sure first that
Indeed
ll �.p ll £ 1
b
� f lt/J(s) !ds f I A(z, s)ldz. (J
b
'
J I A(z, s) l dz � const . Since A(z, a) = (1 - Jl - a)B(1 - Jl , 1 a)(z - a) - JS -a and t.,A(z, s) = a(s - a) - JS ( x - s) a-l > 0, then A(z, s) > 0 for all a < s < z. So
We show that
b
(J
j A(z, s)dz =(s - a) -P j
b
b
b
'
'
:c
'
§ 14. MISCELLANEOUS RESULTS
b
-f To
•
verify
de (e - s) 0 (b - a + 8 - e)IA <- const .
(14.28), we have: X
f It
269
a
cp(t)dt (x - t) l -a
=
X
X
s) j 1/J(s)ds j (xA(t, - t) l -a dt. a
•
remains just to evaluate the inner integral Z
f •
t
X
1r A(t, s)dt = 1 dt de j l J.' (x - t) l -a j (t - e)a(e - a) l + IA (x - t) -a (s - a)IA sin
•
•
X
=
f de 1 7r (s - a)�A sin a1r - J.' (e - a) l + �A sin a1r 7r
•
=
-sm.-a1r-(x - a) -IA , 7r
which gives (14.28) and thereby proves the representability of the function / (x) by a fractional integral. • Theorem 14.9.
formulae
Fractional derivatives of functions of the form {14.27) admit
1 (1 - a)f(t) + (t - a)/'(t) dt , vaa+ I = f{1 - a)(x j - a) (x - t) 0 X
a
(14.29)
0 < a < 1, b
f {1 - a)f(t) - (b - t)f'(t) dt. 1 vba- I = r{l - a)(b - x) (t - x) 0 X
Proof.
We denote
cp = VC:+ f ·
By Theorem
14.5 cp E Lt
and
{14.30)
f = IC:+ cp.
We
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
270
introduce also the function
= (x - a )cp(x) and consider the fractional integral
�
-
�
1_ (t - x)cp(t) _1_ (x - a)cp(t) a + cpl - _ r (a) (x - tp-a dt + r (a) (x - tp - a dt a a
J
J
Using semigroup property of fractional integration we obtain �
(I:+ cpt )(x) = -a J f(t)dt + (x - a)f(x) def = ft(x). a
(14.31)
The right-hand side here is an absolutely continuous function on [a, b - 6], 6 > 0. This is evident for the first term and it follows for the second term from the equality (x - a)f(x) = (x - a) 1- "(b - x) - " f* (x), all factors being absolutely continuous on [a, b - 6], 6 > 0. Then, by Lemma 2 .2, (14.31) is solvable relative to cp 1 and we obtain �
(14.30) is proved similarly. •
•
a
This is
(14.29).
Equation
Remark 14.5. Equations
(14.29) and (14.30) are extended to values a > 1:
1 (t - a) a [(t - a) n - a f(t)]< n ) dt , a 1= r va+ J (n - a)(x - a) " (x - t)a- n+ l a �
where n
(14.32)
= [a] + 1, a -=# 1, 2, 3, . . . , this being justified similarly to Theorem 14.9.
14.5. The Riesz mean value theorem and inequalities for fractional integrals and derivatives Let a function known as the
cp(x)
be given on the half-axis
x � a.
The following theorem is
Riesz mean value theorem for fractional integrals. Theorem 14.10. Let 0 < a < 1, cp(x) E L 1 (a, b) and let f(x) = (I:+ cp)(x) E C([a, b]), f(a) = 0.
(14.33)
§ 14. MISCELLANEOUS RESULTS
271
Given x > b, there exists T E [a, b) such that
j b
j T
(x - t)0 - 1
a
or
(14.34)
a
(which is the same) (14.35)
The latter assumes that cp(t) is integrable beyond [a, b]. Proof. The identity b
b
f
a
a
f(u)du (x - u)(b - u) 0 ' X > b,
(14.36)
is valid. It is verified directly by substituting 1:+
f � f \"(t)(z - t)a- l dt = f(Tt )M(z), ()
b
a
:5
Tt :5 b,
(14.37)
a
where b
a M(x) = (x - b) sin a1r f 7r
=
a
( b - a )/(z- a ) Slll 0' 7r 7r
f
du (x - u)(b - u)0 ds
(14.38)
0
after the substitution b - u = (x - b)s(1 - s) - 1 . Since 0 < M(x) < 1 and f(x) is continuous, there exists a point
CHAPTER 3. PROPERI'IES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
272
Corollary
1.
Let cp(t) satisfy the assumptions of Theorem 14.10. Then
/(z b
a
Corollary 2.
/ b
a
t)01 - 1 cp(t)dt � {max E[a,b]
e
j <e - t)01 - 1 cp(t)dt , a
z > b.
( 14.39)
z > b.
( 14.40)
Let cp(t) E Lt(a, b). Then
j<e- t)01- 1 cp(t)dt , e
(z - t)01 - 1 cp(t)dt
� ess sup
e e[a , b] a
Indeed, ( 14.39) follows immediately from ( 14.34 ) , while ( 1 4 . 40 ) is derived from ( 14.36) without the additional conditions ( 14.33 ) because
j I M'(t) l dt = a
j M'(t)dt = M(a) b
b
-
< 1.
a
We apply now Theorem 14. 10 to obtain certain inequalities for fractional integrals. Theorem
14. 1 1.
Let cp(z) E Lt (a, N) for every N > a. If lcp(z)l � V(z), I (I:+
( 14.41)
where V(z) and W(x) are non-decreasing functions, then for each {3 , 0 < f3 < the inequality
( 14.42 )
holds, where c does not depend on x and {3.
Proof. We start by letting 0 < e
a
< 1 . We have
j x
f(/3)(/:+ cp)(z) = j (x - t)f3 - 1 cp(t)dt + (x - t) f3 - I
a
e
( 14.43)
§ 14. MISCELLANEOUS RESULTS
273
where we choose the point e as follows:
x - [W(x)/V(x)] l la , e = { a, So
if if
x > a + [W(x)/ V(x)] l l a , x < a + [W(x)/V(x)j l l a .
( 14.44)
It = 0 for x < a + [W(x)/V(x)j l l a . We note that the following always holds: 0 < X -e
:5 [W(x)/V (x)j l l a .
( 14.45)
By the monotonicity of V(x) we have �
I I2 I :5 J V(t)(x - t) P- t dt :5 ,a- t v(x)(x - e)P e
and then due to ( 14.45)
( 14.46) e It = f cp(t)(x - t) a- t (x - t)P- a dt and since (x - t)P- a increases on [o, e] 0 for fixed x, by the second mean value theorem for integrals - Nikol 'skii [7, p.368] -
Further,
we have
e
It = (x - e)P -a J cp(t)(x - t) a- t dt,
0 :5
u
:5 e.
( 14.47)
u
Applying ( 14.40) to ( 14.47), we obtain
lit I :5 (x - e)P- a r (a) esssup I (I�\cp)( y) l y E(u,(]
Hence, taking into account ( 14.44) and the monotonicity of the function see that
] I It l :5 f(a) [ W(x) V(x)
(P- a)/a
W(x)
= f(a)[V(x)] t -P!a [W(x )] Pi a .
W(e), we ( 14.48)
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
274
So in view of the estimates ( 14.46) and ( 14.48) we derive inequality (14.42) from ( 14.43) with the constant c = !3rCtj) + H;�. This is dominated by a constant not depending on {3 owing to the properties of gamma-function. Let now a > 1 . Let us choose an integer n such that a/n < 1/2 and let an = ak/n, k = 1 , 2, . . . , n - 1 . We denote / (x ) = max I (I�+cp)(t)l and apply
p
a
the theorem already proved for the case 0 < a < 1 , repla�ing V, I�+ cp and W by la,._p Ia,. and /a,.+t :
with lao = V, Ia ,. = W. We raise these inequalities, corresponding to numbers k = 1 , 2, . . . , 1 - 1, I , I + 1, . . . , ( n - 2), ( n - 1), to the powers of the orders
( n - I) , 2( n - I), . . . , ( I - 1) ( n - I ), I( n
-
l) , l( n l -
-
1), . . . , 21, l
respectively. Then multiplying them all together we obtain ( 14.49) and thus ( 14.42) is proved for the values {3 = a 1 , . . . , a n - 1 · Since for each {3 E (0, a) there exists an l = 1 , 2, . . . , n - 1 such that 0 < /3 - a, < 1, then I�+ cp = I�+ a' I�+ cp. Hence once more applying the theorem proved for small a , w� easily derive the theorem for an arbitrary {3 E (0, a ) . • Corollary.
Let cpa(x) denote the monotone majorant of a fractional integral:
Then ( 14.50)
with c not depending on cp(x). if relations cp(x)/V(x) -+ 0 and I(I:+cp)(x) l $ W(x) or lcp(x) l $ V ( x ) and (I�\ cp)(x)/W(x) -+ 0 are valid as x -+ oo, then for 0 < {3 < a Remark 14.6. Theorem 14. 1 1 is true in o-form:
( 14.51)
§ 14. MISCELLANEOUS RESULTS
275
The proof of this assertion is given by lliesz [1]. We give now an important restatement of Theorem ';I'heorem 14.11 1 •
Let f(x) E I�\ [L I (a, N)],
a
>
14.11.
0, for each N > a . If
l/(z)l 5 W(z), I (V�+ /)(z)l 5 V(z), z > a ,
where W(z) and V(z) are non-increasing functions, then in the case 0 < 1 < a (14.52) The proof of this theorem is obtained from Theorem 14.11 after rewriting I:+ v; = / and {3 - a = 'Y · Corollary. Let f(x) E Ig+ [L 1 (0, N)] for each N > 0. If f(x) and vg+ j are bounded on the half-axis R� = (0, oo ) then in the case 0 5 1 5 a ,
(14.53) Inequalities estimating intermediate derivatives via a higher derivative and the function itself are usually called Kolmogorov inequalities. Thus (14.53) is a Kolmogorov type inequality for fractional orders. We shall not dwell here on the question about the sharp constant in (14.53). Some additional information about this and other inequalities for fractional integrals and derivatives, including sharp constants, may be found in § 17.2 (notes 14.5-14.7) and in § 19.8.
14.6. Fractional integration and the summation of series and integrals There is a close connection between the generalized summation of series, in terms of ''fractional" means known as Riesz means, and fractional integration. Let us 00 consider a series L: cn , which is not necessarily convergent. Various summation
n=l
methods are known for divergent series - e.g. Hardy fact that instead of partial sums [�]
C(z) = L en n=l
[3].
They are based on the
(14.54)
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
276
one or another of their averages is considered and the limit of the average, if it exists, is called the sum of the divergent series. One such way uses averages of the form ( 14.55) the number
s = z-oo lim C0(z) being called the "sum" of the series
Ee . n= l n 00
( 14.56)
The means (14.55) are called
Riesz
normal means. It is known - Hardy [3, p.l15] - that this method of summation is regular, i.e. it sums up a convergent series to its usual sum. The equality
j z
-1 C0(z) = � za C(t)(z - t)0 dt
( 14.57)
0
is valid, where C(t) is the partial sum (14.54) . Equation (14.57) is verified using integration by parts: �)
z z J J 1 a: C(t)(z - t)0 dt = (z - t)0 - 1 dC(t) = L (z - n)0cn . 0
n=l
0
So the Riesz means (14.55) is, up to the factor z - ar (1 + a:), the fractional integral of a partial sum of the series. Equation ( 14.55) can be similarly used for the summations of integrals
J00 f(t)dt
( 14.58)
0
which may diverge at infinity, by defining the value of this integral z J lim � F(t)(z - t)01 - 1 dt, z-oo zO' 0
where F(t)
t
= J f(s)ds. 0
a: > 0,
as
the limit
( 14.59)
§ 1 5. THE GENERALIZED LEIBNIZ RULE
277
Analogously the integrals a
j f(t)dt, f(t) E Lt (c, a) ,
0 < c < a,
( 14.60)
0
t
which are divergent because of a non-integrable singularity at the point = 0, may be summed up. If the limit of the following integral exists
x
lim ax - 01
x -o
j (x t )01- 1 dt j f(s)ds a
-
( 14.61)
t
0
for some a > 0, it is called the value of the integral (14.60). This method of evaluating divergent integrals as defined in (14.59), (14.61) is called the ( C, a )-method or Cesaro -Lebesgue integration. There are a number of investigations concerning the role of fractional integration in the theory of the summation of series and integrals. We note a paper by Hardy and Riesz [1], 1915, which is fundamental to the theme, and the paper by Bosanquet [5] devoted to properties of Cesaro-Lebesgue integrals ( 14.60), (14.61). See also the books by Hardy [3] , by Chandrasekharan and Minakshisundaram [1] and the bibliography given in §§ 17.1 and 17 .2.
§ 15. The Generalized Leibniz Rule In this section the classical Leibniz rule
(/g)(a) = ta (:) ra-n)g(n),
a = 1 , 2, . . . ,
(15.1)
is generalized to the case of differentiation and integr�tion of fractional order. Together with the generalization in the form of an infinite series - see ( 15. 12) - an integral analogue is also considered - (15.17).
15.1. Fractional integro-differentiation of analytic functions on the real axis We first prove some preliminary statements on the possibility of term-by-term fractional integration and differentiation of a functional series. Lemma 15.1.
If the series
I: fn (x), fn (x) E C([a, b]), is uniformly f(x) = n=O 00
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
278
convergent on [a, b), then its termwise fractional integration is admissible: 00
00
(I:+ L /n )(z) = L(I:+ fn )(z), n=O n=O
a > a < z < b, 0,
(15.2)
the series on the right-hand side being also uniformly convergent on [a, b).
� ��"+ !- 1:;+ (n�o In) I
The proof is accomplished by simple estimates of the quantity
taking the uniform convergence of the series into account.
Let the fractional derivatives VC:+ fn exist for all n = 0, 1 , 2, . . . and let the series 2: fn and 2: VC:+ fn uniformly converge on every sub-interval n =O n=O the former [a+ c , b), c 0. Then, series admits termwise fractional differentiation using the formula
Lemma 15.2.
00
>
00
(15.3)
(VC:+ /)(z)
Since = (d/dz)[a] + l (I�+ { a}/ )(z), Lemma 15.2 is reduced to Lemma 15. 1 as term-by-term application of the operator (d/dz)[a] + l is possible following a known theorem from mathematical analysis. We recall that means the fractional integral r;: , if a < 0, see (2.34). Let us prove two lemmas on the representability by series of a fractional derivative of an analytic function in an interval (a, b); i.e. a function which is expandible into a power series in this interval.
Proof.
VC:+
Lemma 15.3.
If f(z) is an analytic function in an interval (a, b), then
(v:+ f)(z) = f:=O (an) f(n(z -+a)l n--aa) J
(�) being the binomial coefficient
(1. 48).
Proof. Let a < 0 and
(v:+ J)(x) = r( �a)
X
J (x - t ) - a- l f(t)dt. a
(15.4)
§ 1 5. THE GENERALIZED LEIBNIZ RULE
Since f(t) is an analytic function, it can be represented series:
279 as
a convergent power
According to Lemma 15.1 termwise fractional integration is possible here which leads to (15.4). In view of (1.48} the case a = 0 in {15.4} corresponds to the equality f(x) = f(x). Now let a > 0. Since ('D�+ /}{x) = {d/dx) la1 + 1 (V! :l - 1 )f(x), then, by {15.4},
( )
)
(
.. [a)+ 1 oo {a} - 1 (x - a)n - { a} + 1 f(n ) (x) ('Daa+ /)( X ) - .!!. dx f(2 - {a} + n) · � n
Carrying out term-by-term fractional differentiation (Lemma 15.2 shows that it is possible due to the uniform convergence of corresponding series) we have
(vaa+ /)(x) By the Leibniz rule
d ) [a)+ l (x - a)n -{a} + l f(n) (x} {a} - 1 ) ( ( dx f{2 - {a} + n} � n "'
oo
·
{15.1) and {1.49} we find
) ( ) � � ({a} - 1 ) ([a] + 1) (x - a) n -a +k f(n+k ) (x) . =� f(n - a + k + 1} k f:'o n (
� {a} - 1 ( �1 [a] + 1 (x - a) n -a +k j(n+k ) (x) (vaa+ /){ X ) = � f{n - a + k + 1} n f:'o k
Introducing a new variable of summation j summation we obtain
= n+k
and changing the order of
(t ( ) ([J�]-+ 1) ) (x f{J- �)-i-aa J+(j1}) (x) .
{a} - 1 ('Daa+ /){x) = t j = O n =O n Hence, by
n
{15.5)
{1.53} we deduce (15.4). •
Lemma 15.4.
If the function f(x) has an expansion of the form 00
f(x) = (x - a) "' E c0(x - a) " , n= O
{15.6}
280
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
in the neighbourhood of the point a, then its fractional derivative VC:+ f as represented by the fonnula (15.7) where
en f(n + p + 1) g ( x ) _- � L._.; f( n Q + p + 1 ) (x a ) , _
n =O
"
-
(15.8)
and the radii of convergence of the series (15.6) and (15.8) coincide with each other. According to Lemmas 15.1 and 15.2, we can apply termwise fractional integro-differentiation to the series (15.6). Therefore, the assertions (15.7) and -( 15.8) of the lemma follow from (2.44). The coincidence of the radii of convergence is checked via their evaluation by the usual Cauchy-Hadamard formula taking the relation Cn f( n + JJ + 1) a (15.9) r(n Q + p + 1) ,..., Cnn ' n --+ oo into account, the latter following from ( 1.66). The lemma is thus proved. •
Proof.
-
If f(x) is analytic in (a, b), it is also true for (V:+ f)(x) with a E R 1 . We note that the semigroup property (2.65) discussed for arbitrary functions in § 2, holds under wider assumptions on the parameters a and {3 in the case of analytic functions. Actually, Lemma 15.4 shows that if a function f is analytic in the right neighbourhood of the point a, then Corollary.
( 15.10) 15.2. The generalized Leibniz rule We realize an extension of the Leibniz rule forms. Theorem 15.1.
( 15.1)
to fractional values a in two
Let f(x) and g(x) be analytic on [a, b]. Then
v:+Uu) = � (;) (v:.;: k !)u
Rl ,
v:+Uu) = k =foo (k :p)
(15.11) ( 15.12)
where (�::p)
is
§ 15. THE GENERALIZED LEIBNIZ RULE
281
given by ( 1.50) , a, f3 E R1 and a -:j:. - 1 , -2, . . . , if f3 is non-integer.
Proof. By ( 15.4) we have va+ ( fg) a
_
oo (a) (x - a) k - a (k) � k r(k + 1 - a) (fg)
.
Applying the usual Leibniz rule (15.1) we obtain after the interchange of the order of summation the result
f: (
f:
a
va+ ( fg) = g (k ) (x) a j=O k + j k=O
v�+ ( fg) =
) ( i) k+ k
) ) ( ( t; [; oo
a k
00
(x - a) k +j - a
f(k + j + 1 - a) J
(j > (x) .
( 15.13)
( a - k ( x - a ) k +j - a (A:) (x) f ) (x). g j f(k + j + 1 - a)
J
'
Hence, applying (15.4) again we obtain ( 15. 1 1). Further, by means of the simple renumeration {3 + k = j, the ca$e of integer f3 in ( 15.12) is reduced according to (1 .49) to (15. 1 1) . If {3 is not an integer it is sufficient to consider the case f3 < 1 owing to the same renumeration. We rewrite (15.11) as v�+ (g f) = E (�) f( i: ) V�+ k g. Applying the operator v:+ to both
p
k=O
sides of this equality and taking the semigroup property (15. 10) into account we have
( 15. 14) Carrying out termwise fractional differentiation (the possibility of doing this is justified at the end of the proof of the theorem) and using (15. 1 1) and ( 15. 10) again we obtain
( ) ( · !3) vaa+-fJ-i+k fVP-a+ k+i g ·
� !3 -� v a+ (Ig ) a L.J L.J k k=O j=O
aJ
282
CHAPTER
3.
PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Changing the order of summation by setting j
- k = n we get
v;+ (fg) = � � (�) (: � !)
- n f)(V�tng ). + n=too f: ( v _;:f3 (!) (: �!) ; - k= - n (1. 48) , (1.72) and (1.77) give the relations f(a - {3 + 1) 2Ft ( -{3, {3 - a + n ; n + 1 ; 1) � (P) (a - {3) = f:'o k n + k f(a - f3 - n + 1)n ! f(a + 1) - r( n + 1 + {3)f( - {3 - n + 1)'
( 15.15)
Q'
and
� L..J
k= -n
(P)k (an +- P)k - f(n + 1 + {3)r(af(a+ -1) {3 - n + 1}"
(15.15) (1.48) (15.12). 15.1 (15.14). 15. 4 00 (15.12) differentiated series can be represented as (t - a) - Pg 1 (t) L: (�)(t - a) k and k :O
Substituting these equalities into and taking into account we arrive at To complete the proof of Theorem we will justify the termwise fractional differentiation of the series in By Lemma and the initial and
r(a + 1) � (t - a) 92 (t) n� [j)f 1 (a - {3 - n + 1) + f(n + oo respectively, functions Y t (t) and 92 (t) being analytic in some neighbourhood of the point a. The latter series converge uniformly with respect to t E [a, x], and the -a
convergence of the second one is easily shown by means of the integral test for convergence if we observe that 00
f(a + 1)dr 1 ( J f + + fj)f{ {3 - + 1) - 2 00 T
Q' -
[2 , 2. 2 .2 .4].
T
_
a
( 15.16)
- Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev Therefore, termwise differentiation of the series in is possible in view of Lemma •
(15.14)
15.2.
§ 1 5. THE GENERALIZED LEIBNIZ RULE
An integral analogue of the generalized Leibniz rule following theorem.
283
(15.12) is given by the
If functions f and g are analytic in some neighbourhood of the point a, then the formula Theorem 15.2.
00
v: (fg) = j (r :.B) v�:;·-PJV:tP9dr, +
- oo
is
valid if a, {J E R1 , defined by ( 1.48).
a 'I
(15.17)
-1, -2, . . . in the case of a non-integer {J and (T :p) ts
Proof. Since functions f and g are analytic in some neghbourhood of the point a
we have
oo f(n ) ( a ) oo g (m) (a) m. "' "' (x at, f(x) = n=O g (x) (x a) = ! n! m m=O By virtue of Lemmas 15.1 and 15.2 and (2.44) we obtain 00 f(n)(a)(x - a)n-a+T+,B , "' (va - T -P f)(x) = ;;:a r (r - a + ,8 + n + 1) oo (VT P g )(x) = "' g(m ) (a)(x - a) m - T - ,8 . L...J
L...J
(15.18)
a+
+ a+
�0
r(m - r - ,8 + 1)
Substituting these relations into the right-hand side of
00J 00
I=
(15.17) we get
00J ( : ) (v::;•-P f)(V�tPg)dT
-oo
T
,B
(15.19) (n n +m m ) - a dr r(a + 1)f (a)g< > (a)(x - a) = ) 1 Q )f( f( 1 Q + f( + + n + + + ,/J T ,/J T ,/J 1 )f(m - ,/J - T + 1 ) " - oo � �O T 00
Direct estimates demonstrate that the double series converges uniformly with respect to encompassing the whole real axis. Therefore, its term-by-term
r,
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
284
is possible, and, hence,
integration
00
00
I = L L r(a +
n=Om=O
X
{ 15 . 1 9) takes the form
1)/(n) (a)g<m>(a)(x - a)n+m- a
00
dr
Joo f{r + {J + 1)f{ a - r - {J + 1)r ( r - a + {3 + n + 1) f {
- r - {J + 1) ·
--:---�--:--�--:---:----- ---:m
-
It is known that the latter integral is equal to 00
dr
Joo r(a + r)f{{J - r)f{1 + r)f{6 - r)
-
r(a +
r(a + fJ + 1 + 6 - 3) r a + 6 - 1)f( 1 + fJ - 1)f(1 + 6 -
{3 - 1) (
Re(a + {J + 1 + 6 ) >
1) '
(15 . 20)
3.
- Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev [2, 2.2.2.9]. Therefore, we have
� I=� ��
n=Om=O
j(n) (a) g<m> (a) n!
f{m + n + 1) m! r {n + m - a + 1) (x
_
a} n+m -a .
Hence, according to {2 .44) we obtain
=
( n v:+ � J( n!) (a) 00
(z -
at � g(mm!) (a) {z - ar ) = v:+ {fg), oo
which completes the proof of the theorem. • We note that and are extended to the left-hand sided fractional differentiation V6_ by a simple change of variable. In conclusion we would point out that there are many generalizations and modifications of the Leibniz rule They touch upon the formulae both for Liouville form of fractional integro-differentiation and some other ones - see § .2.
{15.12) {15.17)
{15.1).
17
285
§ 16. ASYMPTOTIC EXPANSIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
§ 16. Asymptotic Expansions of Fractional Integrals The present section deals with the asymptotic expansions of the fractional integrals z:
( Jg+ /) (x ) =
z ---+
r(la) J0 (x - t)a- l f(t)dt, a >
{16.1)
0,
z ---+
as 0 or + oo , if an asymptotic expansion of f in the neighbourhood of these points is known. Besides, the asymptotic expansions involving power terms and the logarithmic and exponential ones are also considered.
16. 1 .
Definitions and properties of asymptotic expansions
Let us list some necessary definitions. One can find them in detail in Sidorov, Fedoryuk and Shabunin Sect. Fedoryuk Ch. and Olver Ch.
[1,
42],
[2,
1]
[1,
1].
Let M be some point set on the real axis and let a be its limiting point. The sequence {cpn {z)}, n = 0, 1 , 2, . . . , defined for z E M, is called an asymptotic sequence (as z ---+ a, z E M) if for any n
Definition 16.1.
<J'n +t{z) = o(cpn {z)) {z ---+ a, z E M).
{16.2 )
Here are some examples of asymptotic sequences: = = 0; oo; = 3) is any increasing sequence 0; or oo, where such that lim = oo.
1) <J'n (z) z11" , z ---+ 2) <J'n (z) z- 11 .. , z ---+ {JJn } <J'n (z) {lnz)ll", z ---+ x ---+ l' n-oo n Definition 16.2. Let { cp(z)} be an asymptotic sequence (as z ---+ a, x E M) A formal series L an <J'n (z) with constant an is called an asymptotic expansion, or n=O an asymptotic series of the function /{z), if for any integer N � 0 N {16.3) f (x ) - E an
00
To denote the connection between the asymptotic expansion and the function
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
286
f, we use the following symbol
00
f(x) ""' nL=O an
(x --+ a, x
E M).
( 16.4)
An asymptotic expansion with respect to a power asymptotic sequence as in examples (1) and (2) will be referred to as a power asymptotic series. Further we shall omit mentioning the set We also note that although convergent series are asymptotic ones, the term "asymptotic series" is usually used for series which are not convergent in general. Let us give some properties of asymptotic expansions. The most important of them is the uniqueness property which means that the asymptotic expansion of the given function with respect to a given asymptotic sequence is unique. However, different functions may have the same asymptotic expansions, e.g. e- z ""' L: O · x- n n =O n and 0 ""' L: 0 · x - as x --+ + oo. n =O One may treat power asymptotic series in the same way as convergent power series. Namely, we can add, multiply, integrate and sometimes differentiate term by term such series. Definition 16.2 can be used to prove the following propositions.
M.
00
00
Let {J.tn } and {lin} be increasing sequences, and let the asymptotic expansions
Lemma 16.1 .
+ oo
f(x) ""'
00
L anx - 11" , n =O
hold as x --+ oo. Then f(x) + g(x) ""'
00
L CnX- >.,. , n =O
Jl nlim -oo n
=
lin nlim -oo
=
00
g(x) ""' L bn X - 11" n =O
00
f(x)g(x) ""' L Cn X - u,. n =O
as x +oo where the increasing sequence {A n } , nlim A = oo, is obtained by -oo n + regrouping the members of the sequences {Jln } and {lin } , while the increasing sequence { un } nlim O'n = +oo, is obtained by regrouping the products Jlkllj -oo according to their increasing values. In particular, Ao = min(po , llo) and u0 = p0 110 • --+
,
Lemma 16.2.
Let {J.tn } be an increasing sequence, Jln > 1 and nlim Jl = If -oo n +oo.
§ 16. ASYMPTOTIC EXPANSIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
287
f(x) is continuous in (c1 + oo) and satisfies 00
f(x) "' L an x n =O
1-'
n1
as
x --+ + oo1
(16.5 )
16.1
16. 2 are true for
then this series can be integrated term by term
Propositions similar to Lemmas and asymptotic series with respect to the sequence x�'JI.as x --+ 0 i.e.
Remark 16.1.
00
f(x) "' L an x l' n 1 n =O
as
x --+ 0.
(16.6)
We also need the following Watson lemma.
Let a > 01 {3 > 0 and let f(t) be continuous for 0 � t � a and infinitely differentiable in the neighbourhood oft = 0. Then the asymptotic equality
Lemma 16.3.
J . -zt• tP- 1 f(t)dt � Loo r ( n ! P) I :�o) n =O a
�
( )
.,
-�
(16 .7)
0
is true as x
--+
+oo .
One may find the proof of this lemma, for example, in Sidorov, Fedoryuk and Shabunin p .408] .
[1,
16.2 . The case of a power asymptotic expansion Let {Jl n } be an increasing sequence and nlim Jln = + oo. We shall look for -oo asymptotic expansions of the fractional integrals /0+ f provided that the function f has an asymptotic representation of the form or The simplest result is obtained from Namely, the following statement is true.
(16.5) (16.6). (16.6 ).
Let {Jln } be an increasing sequence, Jln > -1 and nlim Jl = oo. -oo n + If f(x) satisfies the condition {1 6. 6}, then the fractional integral (I0+ f)(x) has the
Theorem 16.1.
288
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
asymptotic expansion as x --+ oo {16.8) Proof. By {16.6 ), we have f(t) = n=O L.:N an t"'" + RN (t). Therefore, in view of {2.44)
we obtain
1
(IIM)(z) = r�:) j ( l - tt - ' f( :rt)dt 0
{1 6.9)
{16.4) we see that RN (t) = o(t"'") as t --+ 0. Then for sufficiently large N we RN (t) = ti-'N o(t), 1where o (t) is an infinitely small function as t --+ 0. Hence , we deduce the relation J RN (xt)(1 -t)01- 1 dt = o(x�-'N) as x --+ 0 and the conclusion 0 of the theorem follows from {16. 9 ). The case when f(t) has an asymptotic expansion {16. 5 ) is more complicated. Three main approaches to find asymptotic expansion of the fractional integral {16.1) are known. They are: the method of successive expansions - Riekstyn'sh [1] and [2, Vol. 1, Sec. 11]; the method based on the representation of /0+ / as the Parseval equality {1.116) for the Mellin transform {1.112) Riekstyn'sh [2 , Vol. 3, § § 31.1-31.3], Handelsman and Lew [1, 2] and Wong [2]); and the method based on the theory of distributions - McClure and Wong [1]. We shall give the asymptotic representation for {16.1) by the method of successive expansions which is the most elementary approach. For simplicity, we suppose that f(t) has the asymptotic By have
•
-
expansion
f(t) n=O {16.10) L an t - n -,8, 0 < {3 � 1, as t --+ +oo. It should be noted that the asymptotic expansions for /�+ / will be different in the cases when 0 < (3 < 1 or f3 = 1 . If the first case also gives us a power 00
"'-J
asymptotic expansion then in the second case we obtain a power-logarithmic one.
Theorem 16.2.
Let f be a locally integrable function on (0, +oo) satisfying {16 . 10)
§ 16. ASYMPTOTIC EXPANSIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
289
with 0 < f3 < 1, and let (t) = t13 f(t) - ao , ( 16.11) fn + 1 (t) = tfn (t) - an , n = 1, 2, . . If Kn = tE (1/sup2 , oo) 1tfn+ 1 (t) l is finite /or each n 0 then the fractional integral ( Ig+ f)( x) has the asymptotic expansion f(1 - n - /3) bn xa- n ' ( 16.12) n /3 a f: ( 10+ f)(x ) f: a x n n=O f(1 + o - n - ,B) n= 1 f(1 + o - n) x +oo where It
.
2::
,_
as
---+
bn =
(-1)" (n _ 1) !
00
J0 fn (t)t -13 dt,
n = 1,
2, . . .
( 16. 13)
f(t) = t-l3[ao + ft(t)], where ft(t) is given by (16.1 1) then by (2.44) a f( 1 ,B) ( 16 . 14) (Io+ f)(x) - � f(o) I(x) + f(1o + o - ,B) xa- /3 ' 1 where I(x) = x- 13 J(1 - t) a - 1 f1 (xt)t-4dt . Denoting g1 (t) = ( 1 - t) a - 1 - 1 and 0
Proof. Since we have
a
_
-
taking (16.11) into account we obtain
1 1 xl3 I(x) = j ft (xt)g1 (t)t- 13dt + j ft(xt)t-13dt 0
0
We continue this process. We introduce the notations
n 1{ 9n (t) = { 1 - t)a - 1 - l:L=-O 1 �t)l: t1 \ g: (t) = t- " gn (t), n = 1 , 2, . . ..
{ 16.15)
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
290
Then
xP I(x) can be rewritten
as
1 a (1 ) n +L n=0 n. xn J0 fn+1 (xt)t -Pdt. We note that (16.10), (16.11) and (16.15) yield the relations N- 1
(16.16)
1
fn +t(t) L= 1 an+ kt - k , t --+ +oo, n 0, 1, 2, . . . , (16.17) k (16.18) gn* (t) �=n (go )k!(k) (O) t k - n �=n (1 -k!a)k tk - n ' k k 9n* (0) (1 -n .a)n , n 1, 2, . . In accordance with (16.17) and Lemma 16. 2 we have the estimate x --+ +oo 00
=
"'J
=
L
=
=
1
L
. .
=
as
j fn+ 1 (xt)t -Pdt xP- 1 j fn+1 (t)t- Pdt - x13 - 1 j fn+ 1 (t)t -Pdt 1
00
00
=
0
0
X
(16.19) 1 Now we estimate J fN+t(xt)gN (t)t-Pdt. According to the conditions of the 0 theorem I /N+ 1 (t)1 $ KN t- 1 , t � 1/2, for any N � 0. In view of (16.15) sup l giv(t) l is also finite and hence we have the estimate l g iv(t)l $ LN, LN tE(0,1/2) 0 ::; t ::; 1/2. Therefore, we obtain 1/2 1 1 1 j fN+ 1 (xt)gj., (t)t -P dt $ LN j l fN+ 1 (xt)! t -Pdt + /(Nx- j l giv(t)!t - 1 -P dt =
0
0
1/2
291
§ 16. ASYMPTOTIC EXPANSIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
1 � LN x13 - 1 l fN+ 1 (t) l t - 13dt + KN x -1 lgN (t) lt -1 - 13dt. J0 J 1/2 00
Hence, we deduce the estimate
1
j0 fN+ 1 (xt)gN(t)t-f3 dt = O(x/3- 1 ) x --+ as
+oo.
Taking (16.19) and ( 16.20) into account we have the relation for
x --+ +oo
1 /3 n-1 ( 1 - a) ( a n I(z) - ?; zn+ P I Yn (t)t dt - {; k ! (n + fJ - k - 1) ) N�l ( 1 - a)n /3 dt + 0 ( xN+1 l ) , t (t) + LJ f n+ l n +l ( ) n. x J n=0 0 _
N
*
( 16.20)
I(x)
as
k
_
00
1
and by ( 16.15) , ( 1 .72) and ( 1.77) we find
N
" an f(a)f (1 - n - {3) x - n - /3 I(x) � f(1 - n - f3 + a) =
N - 1 ( 1 - a) 1 + LJ ! n+ n fn+ l (t)t /3 dt + 0 ( N+ ) . x 1 n=O n x J0 "
00
l
_
Substituting this into (16.14) and taking the relation (1 - a
)n = ( - 1)"f(a)/f(a - n)
into account we obtain the desired result ( 16.12).
( 16.21)
•
Let f be a locally integrable function on (0, +oo) satisfying ( 16 . 10) with {3 1, and let ft (t) f(t), fn+ l (t) = tfn (t) - an - 1 n 1 , 2, . . . ( 16.22) sup l t fn+ t(t)l is finite for each n � 0, then the fractional integral If Kn tE(1/2,oo)
Theorem 16.3. =
=
=
=
CHAPTER 3. PROPERfiES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
292
(I�+ f)(x) has the asymptotic expansion oo oo n "' ( - 1) an x a- n - 1 + "' Cn X a - n -1 (Io+ J)(x) ln x n=O L.J L.J f ( a - n)n ! n=O as x --+ +oo, where ,_
(16.23)
co = ao [,P(1) - ,P( a)] + dt, an Loo (1 - a)k + (-1)n dn+1 ' n = 1 , 2, . . . , (16.24) Cn = -f ( a) k=O k!(k - n) f( a - n)n ! k�n 1 dn+l = J fn+ t(t)dt + J (fn+ 1 (t) - �n ) dt, n = 0, 1,2, . . . , (16.25) 0 1 with ,P(z) being given by (1 .67). This theorem is proved in the same way Theorem 16. 2 above. Using the notation (16.15) and (16. 2 2) we obtain the following representation 1 1 N f (a )x- a (J0+ /)(x) = x� j !N+1 (xt)g"fv (t)dt + L a:: 1 j g: (t)dt n= 1 0 0 (16.26) N - 1 (1 - a)n 1 + L n !xn J fn+ 1 (xt)dt n=O 00
as
0
instead of
(16.16). Here the estimate (16.17) is replaced by
fn+1 (t) L an+k- 1 t- k , t --+ +oo, n = 0, 1, 2, . . . k=1 1 Using (16. 2 5) we rewrite the integral J fn+ 1 (xt)dt 0 00
,_
(16.27)
as
J fn+t(xt)dt = � J fn+1 (t)dt = � an x - J (fn+1 (t) - atn ) dt + dn+ 1 . 0 0 1
�
[
00
ln
�
]
§ 16. ASYMPTOTIC EXPANSIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
293
Then, according to (16.27) and Lemma 16.2 we have
�
+oo. Substituting this estimate into (16.26) and taking (16.20) with fJ = 0 into account we obtain the following equalities x -+ +oo 1 N- 1 N a 1 r z - cr ( a )(J0+ /)( x) = L :: j u: (t)dt + L (!!:n�t (an In x + dn+1 ) n=O n=1 0 N- 2 N- n - 1 ak+n + O ( InN+1x ) ( 1 - a) n _ n !x n + 1 LJ kxk x LJ n=O k= 1 N- 1 (1 - a)n an 1 ( j1 = ln z L n=0 n .xn+ 1 + -x ao 0 u1 (t)dt + d1 ) z --+
as
�
�
1
•
+ dn+1 (1 -n !a) n ] + 0 ( xInN+1x ) . According to (16.15) and the formula 2.2.4.20 from Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev [1] we have
1 (1 - t) - • - 1 1 � ; dt = >/>(1) - >/>(1 - a) , = j j g (t)dt 0 0 1 n- 1 ( 1 - a)k oo (1 - a)k J0 Yn+1 n LJ k! (n - k ) = kLJ • (t)dt k:O k ¢n=O k! ( - k) " �
�
Hence, in view of (16.21) we derive the desired result
(16.22). •
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
294
16.3. The case of a power-logarithmic asymptotic expansion Let
f(t) have a power-logarithmic asymptotic representation
00
f(t) L antJJ• (In t) m " as t +oo, ( 16.28) lim Jtn = +oo and mn are arbitrary real where {Jtn } is an increasing sequence, n-oo .-v
--+
n=O
numbers. In this case asymptotic expansions of the fractional integrals Ig+ j can be found in the same way as it has been done in § 16.2 by means of the method of successive expansions. We shall not dwell on this here (see § 17. 1 , note to § 16.3) and consider only a case of a power-logarithmic asymptotic representation of the form
00 f(t) t - /3 L .-v
n=O
an (In
tp - n as t
--+
+ oo ,
( 16.29)
where f3 is a nonnegative real number and -y is an arbitrary one. In this case the asymptotic expansion for /0+ / can be obtained in two ways: by a method based on the representation of /0+ / as the Mellin convolution (1.1 14) - Bleinstein [1] , and by a method of direct estimates - Wong [1] . We shall use the latter approach. Just as in the case of the power asymptotic expansion (16.10) in Theorems 16.2 and 16.3 the asymptotic expansions for /0+ / will be different in the cases when 0 ::; f3 < 1 or f3 � 1 . We consider the former case first. Theorem 16.4. Let f(t) be a real-valued nonnegative and locally integrable function on [0, +oo) satisfying (16.29) with 0 {3 < 1 . Then ::;
00 ( 10+ f)(x) xa- /3 L Bn (ln xp - n , .-v
( 16.30)
n=O
as x
--+
+oo
where ( 16.31)
nk (a ,
1 J {3) = (1 - t) a- l t -13 (In t) k dt . 0
( 16.32)
§ 16. ASYMPTOTIC EXPANSIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
295
Proof. We rewrite the fractional integral Ig+ j as .../X
1 j(t)dt + (Io+a f)(x) = f(a)1 J (xf(t)dt l a - t) - f(a) J (x - t) 1-a X
..;x
0
( 16.33)
J1 f is asymptotically small in comparison with J2 f· We choose 1 - {3. Since (In t)'Y = O(t£) as t +oo, it follows from (16.29) f(t) O(t-P+£) as t +oo and hence,
Let us prove that t such that 0 < c < that =
�
�
..;x
j f(t)dt = O(x( l-P+& )/2 ) as x
�
+oo.
0
We set
(16.34)
..;x
Ma = O�max t� 1/2(1-t)a - 1 . Then f ( a)Jt / $ Ma xa-1 Jo f(t)dt and by (16.34)
we obtain the estimate
(16.35) (1 -
where 6 = c - {3)/2 > 0. Now we estimate By
Hence
J2 f. (16.29) we have N f(t) = t P n=O L an (lntp- n + RN (t),
N (J, /)(x) = � r(:) L(a , ,8 , 'Y - n ; ) + rN (x), z
(16.36) ( 16.37)
where the notation
L( a , {J, "'(; x )
=
X
j<x - tt- 1 t - P(Int)'Ydt,
..;x
X
TN(x) = r (la) J (x - w- l RN(t)dt ..;x
(16.38)
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
296
is used. Substituting
t = xr into {16.38) we get
L(Ot, {J, -y; x) = .,a-P(Jnzp j (1 - T) a -IT-,8 ( 1
+
z-1 /'l
�:) dT. {16.39) 7
x- 1 1 2 � T � 1 then l ln r/ ln x l � 1/2 and hence, (1 l��) = kl:=O {I) ( l��) k . Inserting this expression into {16. 39), carrying out the term by term integration and using {16. 3 2) and the directly verified estimate Since
00
"Y
+
J {1 - r)a- 1 r-P{ln r)k dT = O(x- 6), 6 > 0, x --+
x-1/'l
as
+oo ,
0
we obtain the asymptotic expansion
L(Ot , {J , x) .,a -,8 f: G) rlt (Ot, {J)(In xp - t as x ---> {16.40) k =O According to {16. 3 6) there exist constants k > 0 and c > 1 such that I RN(t)l � kt-P(ln t p - N- 1 for t � 1. Hence, we find that -y ;
�
+ oo.
rN(x) ftOt) J (x - tt-lc P(Jntf - N-ldt . :o;
X
.,fi
{16.38) {16.40) rN (x) O(xa-P(lnx)"Y - N - 1 ) {16.40) {16.37)
= Taking into consideration and we get + as oo. Substituting into and taking the last estimate into account, after regrouping the terms we obtain the asymptotic expansion of the form
x --+
{ J2/){x) xa -{j L Bn {In x p - n as x --+ n=O where Bn is given by {16. 3 1). Hence, according to {16. 3 3) and {16.35) we conclude the proof of the theorem. The case f3 = 1 is characterized by Theorem 16.5. Let f be a real-valued, nonnegative and locally integrable function �
•
00
+ oo,
§ 16. ASYMPTOTIC EXPANSIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
297
(O,+oo) satisfying (16.29} with {3 = 1. Then r(a }x1 - a (Jg+/}(x) Jr f(t)dt + Eoo Cn (lnxp - n , n=O 0 as x +oo, where
���
( 16.41)
,_
--+
(16.42} {16.43} The proof of this theorem follows the same lines as in Theorem
Ig+ J in the form (Jg+ )(x) = ;a(a- )l Jr f(t}dt + f(1a) Jr [(x - tt - l - xa- 1 ]f(t}dt 0 0
putting down the integral
16.4 after {16.44}
and representing the second term in the right-hand side as a sum of two integrals over the intervals JX) and y'x, (see The case of {3 > in is investigated by expanding into the Taylor series of powers of and by using the representation
(0,
( x) (16.33) } . 1 (16.29} x
(x - t)a- l
( 16.45} l ( ) r + r(1a) J [( tt- 1 - .,a - 1 ,8{;.- {-1)1 ("' � 1) (;t ) k] f(t)dt 0 instead of (16.4 4} . The result is, however, more complicated than (16. 3 0 } and (16.41), so we shall not dwell on its formulation. z -
16.4. The case of a power-exponential asymptotic expansion
Ig+ f
In order to find an asymptotic representation for the fractional integral when has a power-exponential asymptotic representation we have to use the
f(t)
298
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
16.3).
Watson Lemma (Lemma Here we consider only the case of the simplest power-exponential asymptotic expansion near zero when
f(t) e - 1/t n=O E an t n as t -+ +0. 00
""J
Theorem 16.6. If
(16.46)
f(t) satisfies the condition (16.46), then E Hn xn+2a , (10+ /)(x) e- 1/:r n=O 00
""J
as x -+ +0, where Hn = Hn (a) Proof. According to
=
r( a
+ n + 1) � ( - 1 t - k r(n - k + a)ak . t:o ( n - k) !r(a + k + 1) r (a)
(16.47)
(16.48)
(16.1) and (16.46) the relation (16.49)
as
x -+ +0 is true. We consider the integral :r a 1 1ft n . , Ja n (x) f (x - t) - e - t dt =
0
t x/(1 + r) in (16 .50) we have
Changing the variable =
Ja ,n (x) xa+n e- 1 /:r f e- r /:r Ta- 1 (1 + r) - a - n- 1 dr. 00
=
0
(16.50)
§ 16. ASYMPTOTIC EXPANSIONS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
299
Taking Lemma 16.3 into account we find J
( a,n ( ) 2a+n e / k� L.J =O X "' X
-
1 x
-
k n l )k f(k
1 ) (a +
x --+
+
k!
+ a)
k
X ,
( 16.51)
as +0. Setting this expression into (16.49) we obtain the desired result { 16.47) . •
16.5. The asymptotic solution of Abel's equation
In connection with some applied problems it is often sufficient to seek not for a solution
1 = f (a)
_
- t)l - a - f(x), J (x
_
0<
x
<
+oo,
( 16.52)
0
but its asymptotic expansion near some point ( usually near zero or infinity ) if the asymptotic expansions of f near this point is known. In this connection we use the idea of the asymptotic solution.
Let { .,P(x)} be an asymptotic sequence as x --+ a, and let the free term f( x) of ( 16.52) have the asymptotic expansion
Definition 16.3.
00
f(x) = n=O L bn'r/Jn (x) as x --+ a (bn E C , n = 0, 1, 2, . . . ) . If there exists an asymptotic sequence {xn (x)} as x --+ a such that 00
( 16.53)
( 16.54)
and 00
(I�+
We note that the uniqueness of an asymptotic solution follows from the uniqueness property of the asymptotic expansion of the given function with respect
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
300
to the given asymptotic sequence. However, the existence of the solution itself does not follow in general from the existence of its asymptotic solution. If we know asymptotic expansions for the fractional integral { 16.1 ), we can find an asymptotic solution of Abel's equation { 16.52). For example, the following propositions which characterize the asymptotic solutions of ( 16.52) as x --+ and x --+ +oo are corollaries of Theorems 16.1 and 16.4.
0
1)
If the free term f(x) has the asymptotic expansion f(x)
"J
00
L an x11" n=O
as
x --+
0,
( 16.55)
p. 0 > o
where P,n is an increasing sequence, - 1 and n-oo lim P. n = asymptotic solution of (16.52) is given by the formula
oo,
then the ( 16.56)
2)
Let 0
< o <
1
and let f have the asymptotic expansion
f(x)
"J
x - 13
00
L b n (ln x p - n as x --+ n=O
+oo ,
( 16.57)
where 0 � {3 1 - and is an arbitrary real number. Then the asymptotic solution of {16.52), considered to be real, nonnegative and locally integrable on [0, +oo ), is representable as <
o
'Y
00
as
t --+
00 .
Here the constants Cm are found (by the known bn) via the formulae
( 16.58)
§ 17. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 3
301
.where nk (a, fi) are given by (16.32). For example, - -,8)-'--:- bo , co = -r-:-(f-'-(1_--
1 a ,8) f(1 - ,8) Ct = f (1 _ a _ ,8) {b t + bo'Y [1P (1 - ,8) - 1/J(1 - a - ,8)]}
etc. § 1 7. Bibliographical Remarks and Additional Information to Chapter 3 17 . 1 . Historical notes Notes to § 10.1. The second set of relations in (10.4) and (10.5) are sometimes called the first index law - Love [5) ( 1972). They characterize the semigroup property of the operators I�+ and lb- considered usually in 1 � p < oo . The case p 1 is specially treated in Theorem 2 .5, in § 4.1 (note to § 2.7) , and in the papers by Love [2, p.1 74) , [3, p.1058, 1060] (1967). The final statement of Theorem 10.1 was proved by Marichev [13, Theorem 1] (1990). Relations (10.4) were dealt with by many authors. In the case Re a > 0 and Re ,8 > 0 they were considered by Love and Young [1] (1938), Hille [1] (1939) and Kober {1940). Kober (1941) investigated also the case Re a Re ,8 0, 0 for functions in a certain subspace of p � 2. Riesz p.12] (1949) extended these relations to the case when Re a or Re ,8 may be negative, but f E p > max(-Re a, -Re (a + ,8)). The relations in (10.4) for all values of a and ,8 in various spaces of distributions were considered by Gel 'fand and Shilov [2] (1959) and McBride [2] (1975), [4] (1977), [9] (1983) ; the latter author used the spaces and F; ,JJ mainly - § 8.4. In the space and in its subspaces defined by existence of the corresponding fractional derivatives these relations were treated in detail by Love [5) (1972) for all values of a and ,8. As regards ( 10.6) and (10.7) - see the notes to § 10.3 below. The particular case a 1 - .81 ±1 of (10.12) was given in Chen [1 , p.309] (1959), although this expression apparently seems to be known earlier. In the case of analytic functions it was treated in the thesis by Tremblay [1 , p.292] (1974). Theorems 10.2-10.3 and Lemmas 10.1 and 10.2 were proved by Marichev [13, Theorems 2 , 3 and Lemmas 1 , 2] (1990). Theorem 10.4 in the given form is published for the first time. In the case p = 1 and Re a > 0 they were proved by Love [2, p.181, 184) , [3, p.1063, 1070) (1967) , who dealt with the weighted spaces Qq d), < oo } and E R,. E > 0} . In these papers the operators (10.18) , ( 10.19) and oo) , (10.20), ( 10.21), respectively, were studied in detail and the decompositions (10.22)-(10.29) were given for them for the values of the parameters, guaranteeing the validity of decompositions for all f ( x) in Q q or Rr . The values of parameters guaranteeing the validity of these relations only by the condition of the representability f(x) Re JJ. > 0, 1/1 E were not considered in the cited papers. Notes to § 10.2. Theorem 10.5 is published for the first time. However, the former of the relations (10.38) in another form was obtained by Love (7) (1985) . He called this equation the third index law and investigated in detail the conditions of its validity in the space ( (0, oo ) ; x�' (x + 1)11 ) or its subspaces defined by the representability conditions (see above) which were firstly used by the author in the cycle of his papers.
Lp(a, b),
Lp(O, b),
[6,
=
=
=
a=
[1]
[2]
CP([a, b]),
Fp , �
Lt (a, b)
=
= { f (x) : xr f(x) L t (a,
a
= { f (x) : x9 f(x) L t [O,
= Ib+ t/l(x),
Lt
d
Lp(O, d),
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
302
We observe that the inversion of the operator (10.39} for a function f (t) such that f(t) = 0 for t > a > 0 was obtained by Ahiezer and Shcherbina [1] (1957) - § 39.2 (notes 35.7 and 35.8). Notes to § 10.3. Theorems 10.6 and 10.7 were proved by Marichev [13, Theorems 4, 5] (1990). However, the relations (10.42), (10.43) and (10.6), (10.7), characterizing the second index law (in Love's tenninology - Love [5] , 1912) arose long ago. The paper by Widder [1 , p.1 7, Lenuna 3.11] (1938} was apparently the first which contained the particular case of the relation (10.6) of the fonn 'l> k x2 k - l v k - l f(x) = xk -1 v 2k - l xk f(x), I> = d/dx , obtained by means of the Leibniz fonnula. These relations in terms of the Kober operators I;i, a and K;j", 0 (see (18.5) and (18.6)} were established by Kober [1] (1940} for a > 0, {3 > 0, see (18.16). Equations of the type (10.6) and (10.7) o ccurred also in Higgins [4, p.7-8] (1965) and Love [2, (3.9}] (1967). As well, Love [5] (1972) investigated (10.6) in details in the space Qq for all values of parameters and obtained the results of the type of Theorem 10.6. The study of the second index law in certain spaces of distributions was undertaken by Enlelyi [15] (1972) and McBride [1], [2], [4], [6], [9] (1975-1983), the latter dealing with the operators Ig+ ;x "' and I� ;x"' as in (18.41), in the spaces f, - § 8.4. The operator (10.47) in the spaces Qq and was considered by Marichev [1], [2] (19721974), while the operator (10.48) with m = 0 was treated by McBride [7) (1982) in the space and by Dimovski and Kiryakova [2] (1985), and also Kiryakova [1 , 2] in the case n = 0. Notes to § 10.4. Theorems 10.8 and 10.9 are published for the first time. However, the
Fp , IJ , F , IJ
compositions
Rr
n j= l
n I:ieAjX f(x) were considered long ago.
Fp ,IJ
They can be found in the papers by
Letnikov [9] (1888) and Nekrasov [3] (1888) where tlie solutions of nth order differential equations with two-term coefficients were looked for in such a form. Such compositions with n = 2 and their inversions occurred in Davis [2, p.137) (1927), but their systematic investigation was undertaken much later by Prabhakar [1] (1969) , [2] (1971) in connection with the problem of inverting the operator (10.55). The operators (10.55) and (10.56) as particular cases of the operator (10.63) , and certainly its analogue were considered by Prabhaka.r [5] (1912) and [6] (1977), respectively. The operator in the right-hand side of (10.62) in the case ..\ = 1 was studied by Belward [1] (1972), who obtained its inversion via the fractional integrals which use the composition structure (10.62) of the operator. Notes to § 11.1. Theorem 11.1 is due to Plemeli (1908) and Privalov (1916) in the non-weighted case (the proof and references are given in Muskhelisvili [1]) and to Duduchava [1] , [2] (1970) in the weighted case. Theorem 1 1.2 is obtained from Theorem 11.1 by simple arguments. For example, by mapping real axis onto a circumference of a circle. Theorem 11.3 is due to Riesz (1927) in the non-weighted case and to Hardy and Littlewood [6] (1936) and Hvedelidze (1957) in the weighted case. The proof and references may be seen for example in Gohberg and Krupnik [4]. Notes· to §§ 11.2 and 1 1 .3. The first paper, which contained at least implicitly the idea of connection between left- and right-hand sided fractional integration via a singular operator, was the work by Zeilon [1] (1924). There is a fonnalism in this paper in the case of a half-axis, which in fact gives the connection (11 .30) or one of the relations (12.8). This is seen in p.9 and 7 of the cited paper. It should be stressed that this article, although executed formally and having some errors in expressions including the afore mentioned p.9, contains interesting and original ideas evidently influenced by T. Carleman, but not noticed either by contemporaries or by later investigators. This was the first paper that contained consideration of the generalized Abel equation which involves both left- and right-hand sided fractional integration. This equation is considered in § 30. This interesting work remained unknown to the authors of the present book also, who only discovered it by chance in 1985. Relations (11 .10)-(11 .12) were obtained independently by von Wolfersdorf [1] (1965) and by Samko [4] (1967), the identity (11.10) being also given by Kober [5) (1967) . Corollaries 1 and 2 of Theorem 1 1.4 and Remark 1 1 .2 are given in the same paper by Samko. Relations (11 .16)-(1 1 .19) were established by Samko [1], [2] (1967), [3], [5) (1968); (11 .18) and (11 .19) were also obtained by von Wolfersdorf [2] (1965). We refer also to the papers by Kuttner [1] (1953) and Chen (1961) where an attempt was made to find the relation of the type (11 .17), but the explicit connection of
17. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 3 303 such a type was not discovered there. Relation (11.19) was rediscovered later on in Juberg [1]-[3] (1972-1973). Modifications of (11.16) and (11.17) for values 0 < a < 2 in the form (11.23) and (11.24) were obtained by Kilbas [5] (1977) (see also [7]) and Rubin [10] (1977). Modifications of (11.18) and (11.19) in the form (11.25) and (11.26) were given by Rubin [11) (1980). Notes to § 1 1 .4. Theorem 11.6 and Corollary 1 were in fact obtained by Rubin [1] (1972). Invariance of the space /01 ( Lp) relative to multiplication by the characteristic function of the half-axis by another way was shown in Samko [15] (1974). Theorem 11.8, proved by Samko, has not been published elsewhere. Notes to § 12.1. The wide use of the operator /01 originated in the Riesz's papers [2) (1936), [4) (1938), [5) (1939), where this operator was introduced in the multidimensional case. The potential H01cp as an independent object for investigation appeared in Okikiolu [1] (1965), [2] (1966), although the more general potential If, containing both the one-dimensional Riesz potential /01cp and the potential H01cp, was introduced earlier by Feller [1] (1952). Relations (12.6) and (12.7) were proved in Okikiolu [2] (1966) and Samko [4] (1968). We refer also to [13] (1971) although at least the former of these relations was known already to Thorin [1, p.37] (1948). Lemma. 12.2 was proved in Kober [6] (1968) and Samko [13] {1971). Theorem 12.1 is given in Samko [13]. Equations (12.19)-(12.21) were earlier noted in Kober [6]. The statement (12.22) on the semigroup property of operators I! was obtained by Feller [1] (1952). Potentials /01cp and H01 cp in the form of Stieltjes integrals were considered in the book by Butzer and Trebels [2, p.31-35) (1968), see also [1). Note to § 12.2 . The results are obtained by Samko and have not been published elsewhere. Note to § 12.4. Relations (12.46) and (12.47) are obtained by Samko [1) (1967), see also (3) {1968). Notes to §§ 13.1 and 13.2. Theorem 13.1 was obtained by Rubin [1) {1972). In connection with the Corollary of Theorem 13.1 we observe that the coincidence (almost everywhere) of Riemann-Liouville and Marchaud derivatives for absolutely continuous functions was noted by Tamarkin (1, p.222, Lemma 1) {1930). The chMacterization of fractional integrals of functions in Lp(a, b) given in Theorem 13.2 was obtained in Rubin [1) {1972), [3] {1973). Statements of Theorems 13.3-13.5 have not been given earlier elsewhere. A statement close to that of Theorem 13.5 is contained in Marchaud [1, p.385) {1927). Theorem 13.6 and more general Theorem 13.12 were given by Samko not being published earlier. Theorem 13.7 is proved in Samko [14] (1973), the case 1 in this theorem being earlier obtained by Dzherbashyan and Nersesyan [6, p.17) {1968) under the assumption that a(x) E H 1 ([a, b]). In connection with Theorem 13.7 we note that multipliers in the weighted space x-01 I0+ [Lp(R� ; p)) , p x"Y , were considered by Penzel [1, p.18-23], [2] {1986-1987). Notes to § 13.3. The results here are obtained in Rubin [1] {1972) and presented here with some supplements. In connection with the representation /�+ cp I�+ 1/J, given in the Corollary of Theorem 13.9, we note that Prof. E.R. Love put the question at the Conference on Fractional Calculus held in New Haven {1974) about the existence of the connection between fractional integrals with different linear limits of integration - Osler [9, p.376) {1975). The answer to this question was in fact known in 1972 in Russian investigations. Notes to § 13.4. Results here are also obtained by Rubin [7) {1974). We note that Theorem 13.13 and Lemmas 13.2 and 13.3 valid for all 1-' 1 < 1 + ,\ - Rubin [22] {1986). Similarly one may take 1-' 1 < ,\ + 1 also in {13.37) and in L� 13.2'. Notes to § 13.5. The spaces Ha and Ha and Lemma 13.4 were contained in the paper by Samko (27, § 9] {1978). Theorem 13.4 was also proved there. A statement close to Theorem 13.14 was implicitly contained in von Wolfersdorf [2] {1965). Notes to § 1 3.6. The generalized Holder space Hw apparently appeared first in Stechkin [1] {1951). As for Zygmund type estimates for singulM integrals we refer to Bari and Stechkin [1] {1956) and the book by Guseinov and Muhtarov [1). Theorems 13.15-13.17 were proved by Murdaev [1] {1985). We note that there is a generalization of Theorem 13.16 to the multidimensional case - Samko and Yakubov [2] {1985). The functional class �� was defined in Murdaev and Samko [1] {1985) and also [2]. This class is known (for {3 ;::: 1) in the case S 0, §
p =
=
are
=
are
=
304
CHAPTER 3. PROPERI'IES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
k
e.g. Guseinov and Muhtarov (1]. In the case of integer {3 = this class was introduced by Samko and Yakubov (2] (1985). It was used implicitly in Samko and Yakubov [1] (1984). The estimate (13.69) and Theorem 13.18 were obtained by Murdaev and Samko (1] (1985), see also (2], [3] (1986) and Samko and Murdaev [1] (1987). Notes to § 14.1 . Theorem 14.1 was established by Hardy and Littlewood [4] (1928) by complex analysis methods. Its proof by the methods of real analysis may be found in D'in [1] (1959). Notes to §§ 14.2 and 14.3. Theorems 14.5-14.7 were given by Hardy and Littlewood [3] (1928) in the case of periodic functions. We gave these theorems in a more general setting than in [3]. Theorems 14.2-14.4 are their modifications. In the recent paper by Kostometov [1] (1990) the sharp version of these Hardy-Littlewood 's results was obtained: the operator 1:+ maps the space
H; ([a, b)) onto H;+ a ([a, b)),
0 < a < 1, one-to-one provided that these spaces are defined in the unsymmetrical way, i.e. via the continuation by zero to the half axis ( - oo , a) while preserving the space and without trouble about the possibility of such a continuation to the right of the point b. Notes to § 14.4 . Equations (14.29) and (14.30) were established by Letnikov (4, p.20 and 58] (1874) in the case of sufficiently good functions f(x) . They were given by Moppert [1 , p.149] (1953) on continuously differentiable functions. Theorem 14.9 on the validity of these results on weighted absolutely continuous functions and Theorem 14.8 were proved by Samko and were not published earlier elsewhere. Notes to § 14. 5 . The mean value theorem 14.10 for fractional integrals was proved by Riesz and was first published in Hardy and Riesz [1] (1915) and afterwards in Riesz [1] (1922). The proof given here is also due to Riesz. It was presented in the book by Chandrasekharan and Minakshisundaram [1 , Lemma 1 .41]. The estimate (14.40) under the only assumption that cp(t) E Lt (a, b) was observed by Verblunsky [1 , p.173] (1931). Theorem 14.11 and the assertion of Remark 14.5 were proved by Riesz (1] (1922). The Kolmogorov type inequality (14.53) for functions f(x) E I�+ (L�0c) is an immediate corollary of the Riesz Theorem 14.1 1 . Under other assumptions and on the whole line such an inequality was proved in the papers by Bang [1] (1941), and Geisberg (3] (1968). See also bibliographical information concerning some other inequalities for fractional integrals and derivatives in § 17.2 (notes 14.1-14.7) and in § 19.8. Notes to § 14�6. The relation of fractional integration to the summation of series and integrals briefty sketched here was observed by Hardy and Riesz [1, p.21] (1915), who developed the method o f summation based o n Riesz normal means for Dirichlet series
oo ·
L an e-�., . We refer n=l
to other papers using fractional integration in summation theory in § 17.2 (notes 14.10-14.15). Notes to §§ 1 5.1 and 15.2. The Leibniz formula (15.1 1) for fractional differentiation first appeared in the paper by Liouville [2, p.ll8] (1832) where the fractional differentiation had been defined via the expansion of a function in an exponential series. As for the case of the Riemann-Liouville definition of fractional differentiation 1)�+ , the Leibniz formula was proved by Holmgren [1 , p.12-13] (1865-1866) and was given with a remainder in the integral form. A year later the Leibniz formula appeared in a paper by Grunwald [1, p.466) (1867) and afterwards in Letnikov [1, p.58] (1868), see also Letnikov [4, p.83] (1874). Griinwald proceeded neither from the Liouville nor from the Riemann form of fractional differentiation, using instead an approach to the definition of va f via the limits of the difference quotient. This approach is presented in detail in § 20, as Griinwald-Letnikov differentiation. The Leibniz formula for fractional differentiation was also considered by Sonine [2, p.35) (1872). A rigorous proof of the Leibniz formula (15.12) in terms similar to modern approaches was given by Y. Watanabe [1 , p.12] (1931 ) for analytic functions. The proof of (1 5.12) in Theorem 15.1 follows the ideas of Y. Watanabe. A series of papers by Osler (1], [2], (4], [5], (7], [8] , ( 1971-1973) is devoted to generalizations, specifications and other forms of the Leibniz formulae (15.12) and (15.1 7) for fractional derivatives. Fractional differentiation in these papers is considered in the complex plane and is defined as a generalization of the Cauchy integral formula. Unlike most of the previous works Osler gave the
§ 17. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 3
305
exact domain of convergence for the series on the right-hand side of (15.12) . Integral analogues of the Leibniz formula were proved in Osler [6], [7) (1972), (15.1 7) being their particular case. Notes to § 16.2. Theorem 16.1 is well known, e.g. Riekstyn'sh [2, v.3, p.271). Theorems 16.2 and 16.3 are particular cases of results by Kilbas [13, Remarks 2, 3] (1988), see also [14, Remarks 1 , 2], [15], who used the method suggested by Riekstyn'sh [1] (1970). The latter author gave asymptotic results for the convolution integral
O(x) =
z:
j F(x - t)f(t)dt
as x -+
+oo
(17.1)
0
under the assumption that the functions F(t) and f(t) have a general asymptotic form more general than (16.10) see the survey in § 17.2 (note 16.1 ). We followed the latter paper while proving Theorems 16.2 and 16.3. McClure and Wong [1] (1979) obtained the asymptotic expansions (16.12) and (16.23) by the methods of distribution theory while Berger and Handelsman [1] (1975) were first who applied the Parseval-Mellin equality representation to integrals (more general than Ig+ J ) to obtain their asymptotic forms. We refer also to Riekstyn'sh [2, vol. 3, 31.1-31.3], Wong [2] and § 17.2 (note 16.2). Notes to § 16.3. Riekstyn'sh [1] (1970) observed the possibility of finding an asymptotic form of the convolution integrals (17.1), which are more general than fractional integrals, by a modified method of successive expansions under the assumption that functions F(t) and f(t) in (17.1) admit power-logarithmic asymptotic forms (16.28) . Other methods to obtain asymptotic expansions of the integral (17.1) may be found in the monograph by Riekstyn'sh [2. Subsections 1 1 .3, 15.1, 22.8, 32.3]. Theorems 16.4 and 16.5 were proved in Wong [1] (1978). It was also shown there that asymptotic expansions of fractional integrals (16.1 ) with a density having an asymptotic form (16.29) might be obtained by the method developed in Bleistein [1] (1975). This method, based on the Parseval equality (1 .116) for Mellin transforms (1 .112), allows one to construct asymptotic expansions for integrals of the form -
(I
I(x) =
j k(xt)f(t)dt
as x -+
+ oo
(17.2)
0
provided that a = + oo and the functions k(t) and f(t) have a logarithmic asymptotic form at the origin. Notes to § 16.4:. Theorem 16.6 is a particular case of a more general result of Riekstyn'sh [1 , T,heorem 5), which allows one to obtain asymptotic expansions of the convolution integral (17.1) as x -+ 0 under the assumption that the function F(t) has an asymptotic form (16.6), while f(t) may have certain asymptotic relation generalizing (16.46).
17.2. Survey of other results (relating to §§ 10-16) 10.1 . Grin'ko and Kilbas (1] investigated mapping properties of the operators (10.18)-(10.21) in the Holder weighted spaces H6(P) with the power weights (3.12) or (5.31) and gave conditions for
such operators to realize an isomorphism between the Holder spaces H6 (P) and H; + 0(p). Grin'ko and Kilbas [2] found conditions on the parameters a , and c in (10.18)-(10.21 ) sufficient for all compositions of the operators (10.18)-(10.21) with special power weights to be the operators of the same form. In particular, some analogues of the semigroup property (2.21 ) for these operators were obtained. 1 1.1. Relations (1 1.16)-(11 .19) and (11 .23)-(11 .26) between left- and right-hand sided
b
306
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
fractional integration may be extended to the case of an arbitrary a
> 0. Namely, the identity
1 Sra -n
{ 17.3)
n
·
n L ck (x - a)n - k , k= 1
Ck =
1 b
(-1)n - k [(n - k)!r(k + a - n)] -1 (t - a)a+k -1-n
00 I
- oo
where 0 < a < formula
1,
for the Feller potential ( 30.78) . Let us denote
sin a 1r
1r
M�' "
WJ (x) = u
[
1: f(t)dt 100 f(t)dt ] 1 _ dx (x - t)a dx (t - x)a 1:
u .!!_
11
.!!_
- oo
follows provided that
See
also (30.68) and
00 1: I f(t)(x - t) -adt - I f(t)(t - x) -a dt. v
- oo
The following theorem holds.
Theorem 17 .1. A function f(x) i& representable by the Feller potential f = M: "
u11 cos a1r) j (+oo) = 0.
Here AC(R1) is the space of functions absolutely continuous on the whole axis - see Definition 6.1 . Compare also Theorem 1 7.1 with Theorem 6.3. The results proposed here were obtained in Samko [13].
17. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 3 307 Okikiolu [4] considered potentials l ex and Hex (see (12.1) and (12.2)) with a power §
1 2.2. weight:
lxlp -v - ex lexp , vCfJ - 2r(a) cos a11'/2 Ix lp -v -ex Hpex,vCfJ = 2r(a) sina11'/2
00
J
It I
- oo
00
J
-oo
"
cp(t)dt It - xl l-ex ,
· (t - x) ltl v s1gn It - xl l-ex cp(t) dt
and introduced their modifications differing from them by a one-dimensional operator:
- oo
lxlp -v -ex H-p,ex vCfJ = 2r(a) sin a11'/2
has
00
J
-oo
]
sign t I t I" sItign- (txl -l-x)ex - -ltl l- ex cp(t )dt
[
(the notation been somewhat changed in comparison with the cited paper). The main results composition relations of the type
are
(12.19)-(12.21):
i�,v and if�,v from Lp (R1 ) into Lr(R1 ) provided that = 0, and -1 + 1/p < < -a + 1/p, 1/r = + 1/p > 0. The inversion of the operators I�,v and H�,v was also given in this paper by means of d 1 - 1 -ex constructions of the type t1Z u ,v + a-p and azd H-ul-, v+ex ex -p · In Okikiolu (5) a connection between the weighted Riesz potential I�#' and the weighted
and the boundedness of the operators p> 0 p. or 0 if p.
1, < � a < 1,
11
- p.
·
Fourier transforms
Ji"> cp = lxl" + a
j ltl" eixtcp(t)dt 00
-oo
J=}P + ex) 1g, cp J=}P>
r(a) cos(a11'/2)(Aex cp, cp) = where
cp E L2 (a, b), cp(x) � 0 (Tricomi [1]).
=
bj jb a
a
lx - Y l a-l cp(x)cp(y)dxdy > 0,
p.
308
CHAPTER
1 2.4:. The operators in
3.
PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
(12.44) have the property
J1 lx - Yl0-1 (1 - y2 ) - If C�-;a (y)dy
.Xnc,!T (x)
=
-1
lxl � 1, 0 < Ot < 2, .\n = sin(:�)�ji(���)n! and C�(y) is a Gegenbauer polynomial (Polya and Szego [1]). 1 2.5. Kokilashvili [1]-[9) investigated the Riesz potential operator along a curve
where
(Kod )(s) =
00
J lz(s) j(CT)dCT - z ( q ) jl - a '
0<
-oo
Ot < 1,
z(s), e R1, defines a curve r, which is regular in the following sense: given any circle D(z,r), a measure of the set D(z ,r) n r is less than cr, c not depending on r > 0 and z E C. H e proved i n pMticular a theorem which states that Ka i s bounded from Lp(R1) into Lq (R1), 1
where
8
-k• t
Lorentz space on curves. The weighted case with Muckenhoupt-type weight functions on curves can be found in Gabidzashvili and Kokilashvili [1) and Kokilashvili [8). 12.6. The Riesz potential l0 r.p was considered by Love [1 1) in a setting when no integrability condition was imposed on r.p other than the existence of l0 r.p as a Lebesgue integral. If 0 < Ot < 1 and (J0r.p)(x) exists for one value of x then it exists for almost all x, and l0r.p is locally integrable in R1 . Love showed that if (1° r.p)(a) exists then f = [0 r.p has average continuity at the point a in the sense that
h
� J If(a ± s) - f(s)lds -
0 as h - +O.
0
Love also conjectured that a similar result is valid in the n-dimensional case. This conjecture is true. - see § 29.2 (note 25.19). 13.1. We dwell now on local properties of fractional integrals f(x) = I�+ r.p of functions r.p(x) from Lp(a, b). To specify their behaviour in Lq(a, q = p/(1 - Otp), 1 < p < 1/0t, or in ya -1 /P(a, b), p > 1/0t (see Theorems 3.5 and 3.6) we introduce the following quantities
Xr ,o ( J, < ) =
Xr, e ( /, < ) =
(
:
c+£
.
e
l
(
b),
;
£
/
)
l/ (z) l r dx
)
1 /r
1/ (z )l r dx
,
1 /r if 0 <
c
<
e,
0<
€
<
e
taking a = 0 and b = e for the sake of simplicity. Special attention will be paid to the limiting case p = 1/0t which was already discussed in § 4.2 (note 3.3) . Results given here were obtained by KMapetyants and Rubin [3], [5).
§ Theorem 17.2.
17.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 3
Let f = 10+
cp, cp
E
Xr ,oU. • ) :0; Cr • a - 1 /p
r
where r and if
(
) i'P(x) iPdx
Lp (O, e), 0 < a < 1,
if
£
I
1�p�
oo,
r
p01 = p(1 - ap) - 1 .
oo,
1 � < Pa p = 1; 1 � � Pa 1 < p < 1/a; 1 � < 1/a < p �
309
Then
1 /p (17.4) oo
if
p
r
= 1/a; 1 � �
oo
if
(17.5)
where
< p < 1/a, if p = 1 , if p = 1/a, if 1/a < p � if 1
oo ,
r r r r
� � Pa . 1 � < pa , 1� < 1� � 1
oo ,
oo.
We note that the constant Cr in (17.4) does not depend on e, while in (17.5) it does not depend on c E (O, e). For the constant Cr in (17.5) does not depend on e as well. In the case of the constant Cr in (17.5) cannot be chosen independent of e. In the case of p the constant Cr in (17.4) and (17.5) admits an asymptotic estimate
p � 1/a
= 1/a
p < 1/a
Cr
=
O(r 11P' ) r -+ as
(1 7.6)
oo .
(f )
In the case 1 � p � 1/a the estimate (17.5) may be made more exact : Xr , c . � = o(w01 ,p (�)) as � -+ 0. Hence a local characterization of fractional integrals follows. Namely, let 1 � p < oo , then Wlder the assumptions of Theorem 1 7.2 the statements ·
IJ(x)l xOt- P =
ess mf o<x < cS --1-1
0;
.
ess inf lx- c l < 6
lf((x) l I
Wa ,p X - C
I) = 0,
1 � p � 1/a.
(17.7)
f(x) f(x)
are valid for all 6 > 0. They give simple necessary conditions for a fWlction to belong to the space I0+ (Lp (O, e)) of fractional integrals of fWlctions in Lp (O, e). For example, if
::J:. 0, then j J0+ (Lp (O, e)). Also for the same lim x-0 reason j 10+ (Lp e)). We note that (17.4) and (17.5) are exact in a sense. For example, in the case the fractional integral = 10+ of the fWlction from 4 4 , 6 > 0 being small, admits
x1 1P-Otf(x)
is continuous in (0, e) and
f(x) = w01 ,p (lx - cl) (o, f[ cpc5 ] + 1/p' cpc5(x) ( .1 ) / e < x < /e f(x) � ! In {� - x) -1 -6
the estimate c
f(x)
for 1
2
p = 1/a,
see § 4.2 (note 3.3)). So for
= 2/ e we have
C-£
which demonstrates the accuracy of estimate (17.5) . Further, let m1 I C (a ,
J lf(x)- fJidx,
= ih I in the space BMO ( a , b).
b), see (4.16), and let II/II* be the norm (4.15)
310
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Theorem 1'7.3.
Let f = I�+ fl''
fP E
Lp(a, b), 1 � p � oo, 0 < < 1 + 1/p. Then Ot
(17.8) (17.8), Lp( a, b)
1/p,
The inequality verified directly in the case a = leads to the boundedness of the from operator into and even into VMO as was observed in § 4.2 ( note 3.3). We note a refinement of Theorem for a = which allows for the behaviour of J (x) in the neighbourhood of the end-point x Let us denote
I�+
BMO (a,b)
17.3 = a.
1/p
BMO � (a,b) = / : f E BMO (a, b), A = sup �� O<
{
e
BMO � (a, b)
a +e
f j(x)dx < a
oo
}
.
The space is similarly introduced with the corresponding condition for the right end-point. One can show that the spaces are maximal subspaces in and which consist of functions continuable by zero to a function in the spaces -oo, and oo ) , respectively.
BMO � (a,b)
BMO (a, b), BMO (a,
BMO � ( a,b)
BMO (
b)
In the ca6 e = 1/p the o p erator., I�+ and Ib are bounded from Lp( a, b), 1 < p < oo, into BMO� (a, b) and BMO� (a, b), re6pectively. Since BMO ( a, b) C n L r ( a, b) by the John-Nirerberg inequality - see Kashin and Saakyan r2: 1 [1, p.210] - we obtain the relation
Theorem 1'7.4.
Ot
11/llr = O (r) , r -+
for f E The constructions in § 4.2 (note 3.3) may be generalized by considering the spaces oo ,
(17.9)
BMO (a, b).
I!� (Lp ) Xl /p , oo· I (0, �) , 0,
introduced by Karapetyants and Rubin They showed that C Let us define somewhat more narrow spaces based on the behaviour of local characteristics Xr,o ( J ,�) and Xr,c ( J, �) as r oo. We denote w(I) = 1 for I C (0, 1), if = � > and ..\ � for any other interval. Let w( = I
(1).
-+
I) (1 + l in Il l )� ,
0,
Y-y 'JJ '� (0, 1) = { / : II / II = llr -'Y
'
oo ) < oo}
(17.10)
0, 1 � JJ � oo, xr(f, l) Xr,oU. �) for I = (0, �) and xr(f, I) = Xr,c(f, �) for + �). By the inequality xr(J, /) � x8 (f, /), r � , it is necessary that "Y > JJ- l in the (17.10) if p. < oo. It can be shown that Y-y , JJ , A are Banach spaces. We observe also that Y-y , JJ , � (O, 1) coincides with £00 (0, 1) in the case ..\ = 0.
where "Y > = ( c - �. c definition the space
I
sup w (I)xr (J, I) II£ ( 1 ,. Ic(O, l )
=
.,
Let Ot = 1/p, 1 < p < oo. The op erator Ig+ i., bounded from Lp(O , 1) into the 6pace6 X-y,p.(0, 1) and Y-y , JJ , � (0, 1) , if ..\ = 1/p', "Y > 1/p' + 1/ p. when 1 � p. < oo and "Y > 1/p when JJ = oo .
Theorem 17.5.
It is of interest to clarify the interconnections between the spaces
Y-y , p. , � and BMO . Without
§
17.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER
3
311
= "Y = 1/p1, 1.1. = oo
entering into details we observe only that for ..\
rt.
Y-y ,� ,.\ (0,1) (0, 1) Y-y , � , .\ (0,1). Y1 (x) {0, p' 1/ 0 < x < 1/2 (In z: -\,2 ) 1/2 < x < 1} (0, 1). J (0, 1) J 1). is X 1 ,o(J, e) < oo O< e <1 x.., ,� (O, 1) Y..,,�,.\ • 1) X..,,� (O, (17.9), 1 1/J.I.. § 13.2, J�+ (Lp ) J6_ (Lp ) 1 < p < 1/a, (13.23). Aa
BM 0
The fonner of these assertions may be directly checked by means of the example and
as
f. BMO
as
=
The latter is valid for
arbitrMy admissible values of "'(, 1.1. and ..\. In fact otherwise for E BMO we would have from whence E BM0 8 (o, sup This not always possible.
Filtally, we note that the spaces unlike admit the imbedding BMO (0, C 1) in view of if "Y > + (Prof. B. Muckenhoupt called the authors' attention � . this fact). of fractional integrals 13.2. As was shown in the ranges and coincide with each other if see They coincide also with the range of the Riesz potential on the interval defined by =
The latter of these inequalities is derived from relation
I�+ (Lp )
(11]);
$
(12.46) or (11.16)-(11.19). In the case p > 1/a the
R1 =
If_ (Lp )
$
R1
holds (Rubin see (17.3) in this connection) . In the case 01 = 1/p neither of these coincidences takes place. This may be shown by means of the local estimates of Theorem 17.2. For p > 1/a we note the following imbeddings
also
= 0,
where P; is a space of polynomials of order j, j 1. These imbeddings are derived from the connections of the operators and with each other via a singulM operator. (11.16) (11.19), and Karapetyants and Rubin [3] gave another proof of the first and second of these imbeddings by means of the 'representations
(12.46) {12.47).I�+ ' 1;:_
Aa
-
a/ 2 X -a 11a/- 2 Xa/ 2 Aa - XaJ 2 1O+ a/ 2X - a 1Oa/+ 2Xa/ 2 • 1aO+ - Xa/ 2 1O+ _
t
_
Lp -spaces ( 2 7, § p(x) (x - a)'Y(b -x)6 • If J(x) I:+ (Lp (p)], 1 < p < oo, 0 < < 1, then alao p1 (x) (x- a)�p(x)P(b -x)"P' (O, p ) , (a + v)p - 1 < 6 < 1 < < 1 - a, "Y < p - 1 -1 < < 1, p - + min(O,pv).
was 13.3. A generalization of Theorem 13.6 to the case of the weighted proved in Samko 8, Theorem 8.6] and (5, p.306] (under more strict assumptions). Let = The following theorem is valid:
E
Theorem 17.6.
01
=
provided that 1
1.1.
01 -
11
+ min
iJ.
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
312
1 3.4. Theorem 13.18 was extended to the case of the weight which is fixed to both end-points of an interval [ , b). Let p ( x) = x)v , J.1. � 0, v > 0, J.l. + a < 2, J.l. + v < 2. The following theorem is valid (Murdaev and Samko [1], [2] and Samko and Murdaev [1]) .
(x - a)�(b -
a
The /r4ction41 integr4tion oper4tor 1:+ ' 0 < a < weighted generolized Holder •P4Ce H() ( p) onto the 3p4Ce H� 01 (p) :
Theorem 17.7.
if w(c5)
1 E �� - ,
"'Y =
max(1 , J.1., v ) , /3
=
1,
i•omorphic411J m4p• the
- a, v - a) , where ��- 1 i• the function cl4••
{13. 68}. 13.5. Theorem 13.17, stating that 1:+ maps the generalized Holder space H0 onto the wa (h) h01w(h), was extended by Karapetyants, Murdaev and Yakubov (1] to the space case of spaces Hp with a generalized Holder condition being considered in Lp -norm on the interval [ , b] . The authors gave the corresponding isomorphism theorem, firstly discovering the Lp -analogue of the property for a function to vanish at the end-point x = a , which is well-suited the required isomorphism. For this see also the reference to Kostometov [1] in § 17.1 (notes to §§ 14.2 and 14.3) in the case w(h) = h >.. . 13.6. Theorems on restrictions and continuation by zero as well as "sewing" theorems for fractional integrals, presented in § 13.3, were extended by Linker and Rubin [1] to the case of convolution operators with a power-logarithmic kernel. 14.1 . The Riesz mean value theorem in the form of (14.40) is valid in the case of an infinite limit of integration:
Jt;or ,
min(1
=
a
only under the assumption that the integral in the left-hand side converges (Isaacs [1]). 14.2 . There is a generalization of the Riesz mean value assertion (14.40) as follows. Let 1,0(x) E L 1 (0, I), I > 0. If 0 < a < 1 and ,\ $ 1 - a, then
provided that the right (left)-hand side here is non-negative (non-positive), respectively (Bosanquet [7]). Steinig [1] used the generalized Riesz mean value theorem to answer the following question: if a fractional integral x>.. (I�+ 1,0)(x ) with weight has local extrema, what effect does it have upon changing the signs of the function itself? This is a fractional analogue of a known theorem about a function which changes its sign at the points of local extrema of its primitive. We note also that there is an extension of the Riesz mean value theorem to the cases a > 1 , see Tiirke an d Zeller [1). In the paper by Bosanquet (7] , cited above, a generalization of the Riesz mean value theorem is given for the case when the power kernel (x - t) 0 - 1 is replaced by a more general one G(x - t) of Sonine type. See § 4.2 (note 2.4) concerning the latter. 14.3. The Riesz mean value theorem (14.40) was extended to functions which are integrable in the Denjoy-Perron sense - Verblunsky [1] and Burkill [1). The latter, as well as the papers by Sargent [1]-[3], concern also Cesaro-Perron integration of fractional order, the so-called Ca p-integration.
1,0(x) x>..
§ 17. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 3
313
14.4. Bosanquet [3] proved a discrete analogue of the Riesz inequality {14.40) as follows
av
is an arbitrary sequence. The sum above may be where A i = (ktO') , n � m � 0 and -considered as a discrete analogue of a factional order difference. Certain analogues of the "interpolation" Riesz inequality (14.42) for discrete differences of fractional order were proved in the paper (6] of the same author. 14.5. The Marchaud fractional derivative (D + J)(x), x E R 1 , 0 a 1 , admits the estimate of Hadamard type:
< <
where
lillie
sup
lf(x)l
and
llnlln•
=
sup
lu(x) - g(y)lflx - y l ,
22-a/2 (2 1/(1-a) - 1 ) 0 - 1 /r(3 - ex ) being sharp - Geisberg [1]. =
zeR1
z,y eR•
the constant
k
=
14.6. The Kolmogorov type inequality
where -A a {3 'Y A and k = k(p, A), was proved by Hardy, Landau and Littlewood [1] . A similar inequality for the fractional integra-differentiation Ig+ which generalizes (14.53) was proved by Hughes [1]. The analogous inequality
< < < <
for functions f E L2 (R� ), which have a generalized derivative j( n ) (x) E L2(R� ), was obtained by Magaril-D'yaev and Tikhomirov [1], who also gave the exact bounds of its validity: a E ( - 1 / 2, n - 1/ 2) , 111 n - 1 (n - a - 1/2), 112 = 1 - "1 together with the sharp value of the constant k. + As for the best constant in {14.53), it was found by Arestov [1] as [2r(a 1 )]1-,./ar under
=
r(a-1'+1)
the assumptions that Marchaud-type derivatives are used in (14.5�) and 0 'Y 1 , a 2. An extension of (14.53) to fractional power of operators in Banach spaces is due to Trebels and Westphal [1] and the form
< � "( � <
has
where A is a generator of a strongly continuous semigroup of operators, ( -A) P being given by (5.85). 14.7. The following "Opial type" inequality
J b
a
I ( I:+J )(x) IPI ( I:+J )(x) l9 x-y - ap -Jjq - 1 w(x)dx � c
is valid, if p > 0, q > 0, as a < x < b (Love [9]).
p+q
= r
� 1,
'Y < r , 0 � a < b �
J b
a
I J(x) l r x"Y- 1 w(x)dx,
oo , and w(x) decreases and w(x) > 0
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
314 We note
also
b ( ) [I(If�\:+I)(x)l ] d b a( ) [ l(f)(x)l ] dx,
the inequality
Ia X rp ( g){x) glb- ( if+g), rp(u)
X _<
II
where G =
Ia
X I{)
g(x)
11(x) g(x) � 0,
is a positive convex increasing function and
>0-
Godunova and Levin [1). There are generalizations of this inequality in Rozanova [1] and Sadikova [1].
14.8. Askey [1] gave interesting connections of fractional integration with methods of deriving various inequalities for trigonometric and algebraic polynomials.
c(t) nL= l en . 11 nL= l en summ J c(t)(x - t) a- 1 dt 0 2. < AO < A l < . , An oo, c(x) = L en A .. Ca (x) � I (x - t)0 -1 c(t)dt I: (x - An )0cn , 0 A .. ] Ca (x) o(x"Y), x - +oo, Cp(x) = o(xf3-a+"Y) (t]
=
14.9. Let
If
a series
00
is summable to the sum
a = lim t:CX., for some a > 0 (see § 14.6) , then it is �:-oo in a similar way for any at1 > at - Hardy and Riesz [1, p. 9] 1:
..
14.10. Let 0
= r( )
1:
-
in the sense that
able to the same sum
and let
��:
=
r (a
1 + 1)
�2
Ot
> 0, if
lim A
:f! 1
and = "Y > - 1 , as then provided that 0 � {J � at . The case "Y = at, {J = 0 was earlier considered by Hardy and Riesz [1].
be a generalization of the Riesz mean (14.55). It is shown in Bosanquet [4 that
umma
> 1
14.1 1 . Fractional integration may be used to investigate a limit of a function similar to its application in s tion of series (see § 14.6) . Namely, let be given for t > 0. One may say that
rp(t)
rp(t) - 0 in the sense of the (C, a)-method, if xlim - 0 xCX., J
a function
t-I(x)a
be such that there exists the limit
2S = a
1:
0
rp(t)(x - t)0- 1 dt
e e-o 2._ea l[l(xo + t) + l(x0 - t)](e - t)a- 1 dt, lim
a>
0
= 0. Let now
o.
The number S is called a generalized value of the function I at the point Denoting in the se� of 2S, let us say that has the value S at the point = 0 in the sense of this method. An investigation of functions the (C, at)-method if 0 as which have finite values in the above sense was given by Verblunsky [1).
rp(t) l(x+ t) + l(xrp(t) - t) -- t -
l(x)
xoxo.
14.12. Bosanquet [2] gave sufficient conditions in terms of fractional integration for a Fourier series to be A-summable. A series is called A-summable to a sum S, if = S and a bounded converges for which has the finite limit lim < 1 to a sum x - 1 -0 2S. It was proved in variation on [0, 1]. Let E Lt (0, and = able to a sum S at the point the cited paper that the Fourier series of a function l(x) is A-s
lx l
an A(x) A(x) + + l(x) 211") 2rp(t) l(xo t) umm l(xo - t) L
L
an xn
§ 17. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 3 11:0 ,
315
if there exist such a > 0 and E > 0 that
j0 r 1 -a i(I0+
A weaker condition
J1 t-1 -a (10+
= o
(log t}, a � 0, was used for the sununation of
the Fourier integral by Mohapatra [1]. See also Bosanquet [2a], Bhatt and Kishore [1], Kishore = t)] was used and Hotta [1], where the bounded variation of t� as a sufficient condition for the generalized sununability of Fourier series of the function 14.13. Beekmann [1, 2] showed that the integral transform
(10+
(Ca
�
�
> 0,
is "perfect" in the sense that the set of all functions in certain linear spaces B, having a finite limit lim is dense in the set of all functions in B, having lim More specified �-oo �-� formulations may be seen in the cited papers.
(Ca
14.14. Cossar [1] investigated the summability of integral
00
by
0
which leads to the convergent integral
00
a)-method,
> 1. This is the formula of
fractional integration by parts , where is the Cossar derivati,ve (9.1). 14.15. The connection of fractional integration with methods of summation of series sketched in § 14.6 holds not only in the case of Riesz mean method, but in the case of other methods as well. Thus, Kuttner and Tripathy [1] investigated such a connection with Hausdorff summation methods. We note also that Bosanquet and Linfoot [1] used "generalized" Riesz means with a power-logarithmic kernel, which lead to "fractional integrals" with a power-logarithmic kernel. In connection with fractional integration in summation theory we mention finally the papen by Flett [1], [2], Sulaxana K. Gupta (1], Hardy and Rogosinski [1], Minakshisundaram [1], Mikolas [1]-[3], [1], [8], Wang [1] , (2], Paley [1] and Loo [1). We note also that fractional integration arose naturally in the so-called Hausdorff inclusion problem for Hausdorff and Cesaro methods of sununation, see Garabedian, Hille and Wall (1} . We also mention the paper by Yogachandran [1] , which deals with the problems of the asymptotics treated in the Cesaro sense. 14.16. Connections are known between the differentiability properties of a function and the rate of its approximation by algebraic or trigonometric polynomials - see for example, the book by Timan [3]. The first paper containing investigation of such a connection in the case of fractional differentiability was the work by Montel [1]. He proved a generalization of Bernstein's theorem in the case of fractional derivatives. This states that the rate of approximation of a function by algebraic polynomials given by the inequality An -'Y , -1 5 � 1 , 'Y > 0, implies the existence of all fractional derivatives a = - 1 of orders a 'Y · We note also that Montel [1] gave a generalization even to the case of two variables - see fractional derivatives of functions of many variables in § 24 and the mentioned generalization in § 29.2 (note 24.8). There are many investigations concerning trigonometric polynomial approximation of functions, which have derivatives of fractional order, see § 23.2 (note 19.6) . Such investigations in the non-periodic case may be found in lbragimov [1], [2], Nasibov [1] and Kofanov (1], where the approximation of fractional integrals by algebraic polynomials was considered, the results of the
f(x) - lxP as x- oo
(x)-Pn (x) l 5 ('D�+IJf)(x),
<x
f(x)
316
CHAPTER
3.
PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
[2] Wfl(x)1:+ (L1) £1 (-1,1). l(x), En (Wfh sup{En (/) : I E Wf}.
latter paper being extended to the case of functions of two variables in the work of the same author. His paper contains a result which is final in a sense . Let denote the = space of functions representable by the fractional integral of a function in Let be the best approximation of the infimum being taken over the = set of all polynomials of a degree � n, and let = Then, as was shown by Kofanov
[1] En (fh inf{lll - Pl l£1}
1 1 + 2) arccosxdx En (Wfh te[-1 ,1) r(01) /<x-t)cr- 1 t � 1, � [01) - 1. [1]-[4] (15.11) 'D:+ (uv) = nL- 1 (�) 'D�.;k uv(k ) + Rn , k:O =
sign sin( n
sup
n if Ot Finally, we note that Starovoitov investigated the approximation of fractional integrals by rational functions. 15.1. Besides the Leibniz formula for a fractional derivative the following Leibniz type expression with a remainder:
[1 , [1 , p.16], [1]). [2, p.755) (20.10) 23.2 (15.20.161)). Ot ) 'Daa+-{J-n I'D/J+n 'Daa+ (lg) LJ ( a+ + {3 n=-oo (15. 1[2),5), [7), [8] I [1], {15.17) (22.4)). [1], [8] (17.12) I
(17.1 1) (15.v(x).11)
holds (Holmgren p.12] , Y . Watanabe Al-Bassam In comparison with has the advantage that i t does not require the infinite differentiability of the function 15.2. The Leibniz result was proved by Post for generalized fractional derivatives -§ (note Y. Watanabe proved the relation
(17.11)
= '"' 00
9
n
(17.12)
more general than by expanding and g in power series. 1 5.3. Osler gave a series of generalizations of the Leibniz rules and via generalizations of the Cauchy integral formula for fractional derivatives on the complex plane (see In Osler was extended to fractional derivatives (and integrals) of a function by a function r.p, i.e.
(17.12)
X
'D�I(x) rc�Ot) J l(t)[r.p(x) r.p(t)] -cr-l r.p'(t)dt r.p- 1 ( 0 ) =
- see §
18.2.
_
The generalization 00
'D� I(x,x) = nL = -oo ({3: h) 'D:;)�(x) l(x, t) l t=x ' 'Dcr'�. / l(x, t) (5], [8] (17.12)
(17.13)
was also given, where denotes mixed fractional derivative of by a function r.p with
{3,
§ 17.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER
(17.13).
317
3
theory was discussed which led to further generalizations of The results were applied in t.he above papers to expand certain special fWlctions in series. Arora and Koul the integral analogue of the Leibniz rule with /3 = 0 to obtain the integral representations for some special functions. In Osler a general integral analogue of the Leibniz rule was proved, and being particular cases. We add that Lavoie, Tremblay and Osler proved the relation generalizing
(15.17) [ 7 ) (15.17) (17.12), (17.13) (17.12):
[1] used
[1]
0<
c
$ 1,
an d gave its integral analogue by m eans of the evaluation of fractional derivatives via the Pochha.mem r integral (see Wlder weaker asswnptions than in the papers by Osler cited above. 15.4. Walker's expression
§ 22)
vN [!Nuv) LN =
W(N, n),
n=O
and the Cauchy relation
N vN- 1 [JN D(uv)) L =
C(N, n),
n=O
1, 2, 3,...
which are generalizations of Leibniz fonnula, were extended from the values N = to arbitrary values N E C by Osler 0) 1 5.5. Al-Salam and Verma and Agarwal extended Leibniz rule to the case of the so-called q-derivatives - 23.2 (note 15.6. Polking established an analogue of Leibniz rule for the non-linear multidimensional differentiation operator of fractional order Dp, q , 0 < ex < p oo, which is defined as
[[12] . [3] § 18. 5 ). [1] 1, 1 $ $
[J ( J I 00
(Dp,q f)(x) =
0
(Dp, 00 / )(x) =
J (x
!11�1
sup
O< p< oo
Rubel [2]
p - cx
+ p;l- J(x) IP dy
(j
!11�1
)
q /p
d:
(15.11)
]1
1$
'
) 1�
IJ(x + py) - f(x) !P dy
(15.1)
/q
,
q
< oo,
q = oo.
15.7. Gaer and obtained the Leibniz rule and its generalizations for a fractional derivative which is specifically defined in the complex plane in terms of a certain entire
318
3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS exponential type - see § 23.2 (note 22. 9 ). Manocha [3], Manocha and Sharma (1], Arora and Koul (1] and Srivastava [2] applied CHAPTER
function of 1 5.8.
the generalized Leibniz rule to obtain some relations between certain functions of hypergeometric type and the Fox H-function. Riekstyn'sh gave asymptotic expansions for the convolution integral 16.1. generalizing the fractional integral (16.1) in the following cases: for under the
1) x - +O (17.1), assumption that the functions F(t) and f(t) have asymptotic expansions f(t) - e-o / t or L: an t�-'• n=O as t - +O. This generalizes (16.6) and (16.46), provided that a � 0, 0t > 0 and is an increasing sequence such that > -1 and lim J.'n +oo; 2) for x - +oo when F(t) and f(t) have 00
1'0
asymptotic representations
f(t) -
M
oo
m=O
n=O
n- oo
L b�"' + L an cn -IJ ,
(16.10).
1Jn
=
0 < {3 1, 0 .\o < .\1 < · · · < .\n < . . . (17.14) $
$
generalizing We remark that Riekstyn'sh used a modification of the method of successive expansions, firstly applied in Tihonov and Samarskii [1], in order to obtain an asymptotic expression of the integral as x see also the book by Riekstyn'sh v. § 1 6.2 . Berger an d Handelsman obtained asymptotic expansions of a fractional integral - (18.41 ), in the following two cases: a) for under the by a function assumption that f(t) has an expansion as t - +O; b) for provided that f(t) has an asymptotic expansion
(17.2) [1]+oo xP (16.6) f(t) "' e-a t L n =O
(JO+;zP J)(x)
[2. 1, 11]. x - +O
x - +oo 0, (17.15) where J.'n an increasing sequence such that lim Rel'n +oo. The investigation uses the n -oo methods developed in Handelsman and Lew [1], [2] and is based on the Parseval equality (1. 1 16) for the Mellin transform (1. 1 12). These methods allow one to find asymptotic expansions of the integrals (17. 2 ) if the functions k(t) and f (t ) have a power asymptotic expansion as t - +O and t - +oo. See also the book by Riekstyn'sh [2, v. 3, § 31 .1-31.3]. Berger and Handelsman (1] the following results were obtained: 1) f(t) has the asymptotic expansion (16.6), then (17.16) as x- +O; 2) if f(t) allows the asymptotic expansion (17. 1 5) as t - +oo, then for x - +oo: ( 1)n!lJt{J; (n + 1) � (IO+,a zP f)(x) - n=O (17.17) L..J - n!r(at -p n) } xp( a -n - 1 ) , a > 0, rot being Mellin transform (1. 1 12), and � ( - l )n9Jt (IO+a .,zP J)(x) "' n=O L..J n!f(at{J;p- (nn) + xp(a -n- 1) (17.18) 00
is
a n C�-'• ,
a�
=
if
In
if
.
1 )}
17. 3 319 a = 0 (16.10) p(n0+< 1) < 1, n, = 0, 1, 2,.... J (16.1) {3 x +oo: (17.18) - {3 - n) xa-{3-n (LO+a J)(x) L...=O., r(1an r(1+a-f3-n) n (17.19) (-1)"VJ1{J;n + 1} xa-n - 1 +� L... ., n! r (an) n=O (16.11) 2 . J has (1] (16.12) (16.23). (17.17) (17.18), 16 17.1 (/O f)(x)16.(124]) J (17.15) + ;xP 0. [1] (15] used {18.1) a = 0 J (17.15) a = 0. (1] (15] (41.23), (41.24), {41.42) {41.44). [2, 3, 32.f(t) 2], [16] +oo a J e-x(t- ) (v�:;>. J)(t)dt, §
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER
if and IJ.m 'Ifor all m In particular, if has the asymptotic expansion with it follows from that the fractional integral has the following asymptotic expansion as namely
""' � 00
which is equivalent to see also Wong [ ] McClure and Wong obtained this result by a method based on the theory of distributions, when power asymptotic expansions Although powerful, the method does not seem to lead to the construction for the error or tenns in the expansions and such constructions being important in applications, in particular, for the approximate calculation of integrals. Kilbas used a modification of the method of successive expansions (see § and § (note to § for obtaining the complete asymptotic expansions with explicit error terms for with where satisfies The results differ in the cases of integer and non-integer values of IJ.m/P· The former a = case leading to logarithmic asymptotic results was pointed out by Berger and Handelsman who gave only the first term of the asymptotic expansion. Kilbas [13], also this method to obtain complete asymptotic expansions and explicit error terms for the Erdelyi-Kober-type operators with when satisfies with Berger and Handelsman and Kilbas [13], applied also the above results to find the asymptotic representations for solutions of boundary value problems of the Euler-Poisson Darboux equation and of generalized axially symmetric potential theory - see and
16.3. In the case when by Riekstyn'sh v. n. integral. 16.4. Erdelyi
is oscillating as t - oo, one of the methods, given in the book may be used to find asymptotic representations for a fractional
obtained asymptotic representations for the integrals
a a
J e-xt(v� >. )(t)dt, 0 < a < +oo, :; f
0
as
X -
+oo,
where
'D�+ ). j is a fractional derivative
(1]
(2.22), 0 < .,\ < 1.
1 6.5. Wong found the five first terms o f asymptotic expansions for fractional integral as x - +oo under the assumption that cp(t) has a power-logarithmic asymptotics of the form
(/0+ cp)(x)
where
$;
$;
In t C (In In t) 2 cp(t) ""' t -f3 (ln t)"Y CQ Cl In -2 In t (In t) 2
0 {3 1
and
'Y E
(d.
[+
R1 {16.29)).
+
+ ] as t - +oo 16.4 16.5 • • •
This result and Theorems
and
were a:vplied
CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
320
fP(x) of non-linear integral equations .. , -/1r�.P(x) J (x- t) - 112[J(t) - 'Pn (t)]dt, 0 under the assumption that the known function f(t) admits a power asymptotic expansion as tWe note that the first tenn of the asymptotic expansion for solutions fP(x) of the equation in these and other were earlier given in Handelsman and Olmstead and Olmstead and Handelsman where an application to a problem in heat conduction theory was also demonstrated. problem of finding an asymptotic expansion for fractional integrals Ig+ using a given asymptotic expansion of a function may be set in the case of a fixed number of asymptotic terms. Namely, let 'Pn (x), x R�, be an asymptotic sequence and let a function for a certain fixed but not necessarily being satisfied for as x f(x) satisfies What is then an asymptotic expansion for 10+ as x the case 'Pn (x) x-n
to obtain asymptotic solutions
:r:
=
n = 1 , 2,
(17.20)
.
(16.5)
+oo.
(17.20)
[1],
[1],
cases
1 6.6. A
E
N
(16.3)
+ 1.
+oo
IP
1.{1,
N
IP
oo? In
=
the question on asymptotics in such a setting was considered by Betilgiriev [1], [2] in connection with an investigation of a convolution type equation on the half-axis - the Wiener-Hop£ equation - the symbol of which has real roots of fractional order.
Chapt er 4. Ot her Forms of Fract ional Int egrals and Derivat ives Th�s chapter completes the presentation of the theory of one-dimensional fractional calculus. Here various types of fractional integrals and derivatives of real variables, not considered previously are studied and fractional calculus in the complex plane is presented (§ 22). Some of the new forms under consideration are modifications or direct generalization of Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals and derivatives, which were studied in the previous chapters. Others are based on quite different approaches. Nevertheless many different forms coincide with one another on certain spaces of functions, and in some cases even the domains of definition of a priori different forms coincide. This is shown in this chapter. We draw special attention to an interesting approach via differences of a fractional order, which goes back to Grunwald and Letnikov. This approach is developed in § 20 both in the periodic and non-periodic cases. The end of the chapter (§ 23.3} contains a collection of answers which are given in this book to some open questions put at the First Conference on Fractional Calculus in New Haven, 1974.
§ 18. Direct Modifications and Generalizations of Riemann-Liouville Integrals Various modifications and generalizations of classical fractional integration operators are known and are widely used both in theory and applications. In this section we dwell on such modifications as Erdelyi-Kober type operators, fractional integrals of a function by another one, Hadamard fractional integrals and derivatives, Bessel type fractional integr<>-differentiation, Chen fractional integrals and Dzherbashyan generalized integral.
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
322
18. 1 . Erdelyi-Kober-type operators
38)
In investigations of dual integral equations (see § and in some other applications the following modifications of Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals and derivatives are widely used:
(18.1) -n ,
a>
a>
Iba- ·q '1 J( X 1
1
0�
)
_
- X
CTfJ
(- uxCT-d l dx ) n q(n-'1) Jba-+n·CT f1 -n ) X
1
1
J( X
'
0,
a>
-
n
,
(18.2) (18.3) (18.4)
b � oo for any real u or -oo � a < x < b � oo for integer u. In 0, b = +oo and u = 1, the integrals (18.1) and (18.3) are
where a<x< particular, if a =
z:
";(:; j (r - tt- 1 t" f(t )dt ,
0, (18.5) K;;, a f( r ) = �- ; 1 ,, /( r ) = r�:) j ( t )a - l c• - a / (t )dt , a > 0. (18.6) The operators (18.1) and (18. 3 ) with a = 0 and b = +oo are called Erdelyi operators while the integrals (18. 5) and (18. 6 ) are called Kober (or Kober-Erdelyi ) operators. It is thus natural to call the operators (18.1)-(18 . 4 ) Erdelyi-Kober-type operators. r.. a f(z) = J�+;l,q / (z) =
a>
0
00
- :r
z:
We shall also use the following notations:
(18.7) if a = -oo,
b = +oo, and (18.8)
if u =
2. The operators (18.8) are often called Erdelyi-Kober operators.
§ 18. GENERALIZATIONS OF RIEMANN-LIOUVILLE INTEGRALS
323
(18.1) (18.3) (18.5) (18.6)) -1. Lp (a, 1 p oo, a > 0 +oo 1.5 . a = 0 = +oo (18.1) Lp (O ,oo), 1 p oo, (18. 3) Lp (O , oo), 1 p oo, > -1 + 1/p(f, > -1/pu. (18.5) (18.6) Lp (O , oo), 1 p oo, -1/p', > -1/p xu = tu = T (18.1)-(18.4) 2):
The operators and (in particular, the operators and are the operators with a homogeneous kernel of degree So, the fact that it is bounded in b), _$ < with and b < follows from Theorem When and b the operator is bounded in _$ < if and the operator is bounded in _$ < if TJ In particular, the operators and are bounded in TJ _$ < if TJ > and TJ respectively. After the change of variables are reduced to the y, usual Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals and derivatives (see §
(18.10) and therefore, if
a = 0 we set l�+; u,, f(x) = f(x), 1�- ;u,, f(x) = f(x) .
(18.11)
Let us note that the property
( (fXu-d 1dx ) n = X1 - u ( (fdxxdu- 1 ) n xu- 1 allows us to rewrite
(18.9)
(18.12)
(18.2) and (18.4) in the equivalent form
(18.10)
a>
-n,
(18.13)
a>
-n.
(18.14)
Relations and enable us to extend the known properties of the Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals and to Erdelyi-Kober-type operators. Let us give the main properties in order to use them in § when solving dual equations:
1:+
16_
38
324
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
)
a
shift formulae u u l�+;u,, z /3 f(z) = z /3 I�+ ;u,,+/3 /(z) , lb- ;u,, x u/3 f(z) = zu/3 lb- ;u,, - /3 /(x) ;
b)
(18.15)
composition formula_e l�+;u,, I:+;u,,+a f (x) = l::;�.,f (x) ,
(18.16)
lb- ;u,, If_;u,,+a f (x) = l:_��., f (z) , which hold in the corresponding spaces of the functions f if f3 > 0, a + f3 {3 < 0, a > 0 or a < 0, a + f3 � 0 (see Theorem 2.5) ; c)
factorization formulae
l�+;u,,f (x) = n -a lb- ;u,,f(x) = n -a d)
n
II l:J7nu,(f1+k)/n - 1 f(x) ,
k= 1 n
II I:! �u.('l+k - 1 )/n f(z) ;
(18.16')
k= 1
expressions for inverse operators ( I�+;u,, ) - 1 f (x) = I;;_f;u,,+ a f (x) , ( Ib- ;u,, ) - 1 f (x) = lb"-�u,,+ a f (x) ;
e)
� 0 or
( 18.17)
formula of fractional integration by parts
j b
a
Let
xu - 1 f (x) I:+;u,, D (x)dx =
j zu- 1 g(x)Ib- ;u,,f(x)dx. b
( 18.18)
a
Jv (z) be the Bessel function of the first kind (1.83). We define the operator
325
§ 18. GENERALIZATIONS OF RIEMANN-LIOUVILLE INTEGRALS
of the modified Hankel transform s,, OtjD by the formula
J0
s, ,a ;a !(z) = (fa ., -a a/ 2 c aa f 2+ a - l J2>J + a (� (zt t/ 2) f(t)dt, 00
(T
> 0.
(18.19)
(18.19)
After the corresponding changes of variables and functions can be reduced to the form of the usual self-dual Hankel transform (Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi from whence it is easy to obtain by reverse changes the following representation for the operator inverse to
[4, 8.1(1)])
(18.19):
(18.20)
Re (277 + a) � -1/2. For (18.19) the following composition formulae hold s;,�,a /(z) = S,+ a , -a ,a /(z),
I�+ ;a,, +{j s,,{j;a /(z) = s,, a+{j ;a f(z), I� jD,fls, +a ,{j;a /(z) = s,, a+{j;a /(z); S, + a,fJ ;a S,, a;a /(z) = I;:!,, f(z), S,, a; a S, +a ,fJ ;a /(z) = I�t!,, J(z);
(18.21) (18.22)
s, +a ,[j , a l�+;a ,, f(z) = s, , a+{j ;a /(z), s, , a; a l� ; a,,+ a f(z) = s, ,a+{j;a /(z).
(18.23)
All of them are proved by means of the definitions of the involved operators, by interchanging the order of integration and by evaluation of the inner integrals under some convergence conditions of the type a > 0, {3 > 0, a + {3 > In these calculations it is convenient to use and from Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev These relations can be extended to other values of the parameters a, {3 and 71 by analytic continuation but in more narrow functional spaces where the corresponding operators are defined.
[2).
2.12.4.6 , 2.12.4.7 2.12.3 1.1
0.
18.2. Fractional integrals of a function by another function Erdelyi-Kober operators used the power (z a - t a ) a - 1 instead of (z Developing this idea we may introduce a fractional integration of the form
) a 9 (t ) dt, a+;g
JOt
1
�
'
a > 0,
- oo
� a < b � oo ,
t)01- 1 •
( 18.24)
326
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
L1 (a,b)
defined for every function
integral of a function
(18.24)
by a function g(z) of the order a . g'(z) #= 0,
( 18.25)
a � z � b,
then the operator 1:+ ;g is easily expressed via the usual Riemann-Liouville fractional integration after the corresponding changes of variables:
(18.26) where Q is a substitution operator: (Q/)(z) = J[g(z)]. So, many properties of the fractional integral in particular the semigroup property
(18.24),
(18.27)
o+;fJg
(18.25) a ,
follows under assumption directly from the corresponding properties of the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral I�+ It follows also from and P l that, if gp (z) = [g(z) - g( )] - then the equality
.
(18.26)
(2.44)
(18.28) holds. In view of v:+ ;uf so that
(18.26) we may introduce the corresponding fractional differentiation v:+;uf = QV�+ Q - 1 f.
('D�+ ;, I)(z) =
Simple calculations lead to the equality
r( t � a) g'�z) : ja [g(z/�t�(tW g'(t)dt, :r:
.,
O < a- < 1 .
(18.29)
(18.29) may be called a Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives of function / (z) by a function g(z) of the order a (0 < a < 1). Derivatives of the higher orders are defined by a relation similar to the former of (2. 3 0). The expression
327
§ 18. GENERALIZATIONS OF RIEMANN-LIOUVILLE INTEGRALS
We may easily transform
a ) /(z) (va+;g
(18.29) to the Marchand form of the type (13.2): 1 /(z) f(1 - a) [g(x) - g( a)]a a
+ f(1 - a)
:r:
f a
f (x) - f(t) (t)dt, [g(x) - g(t)p + a 9 1
(18.30)
O < a < l.
To show this, it is sufficient to apply the operators Q and Q - 1 to the operator D�+ ' = g(a), defined by (13.2), from the right and from the left respectively. We prove now the following theorem, which goes back to Erdelyi (9].
c
The space of functions representable by a fractional integral
Theorem 18.1.
I:+ g'P 0 < a < 1, ;
,
oo, -oo
oo ,
provided that g(x) E C1 ([a, b]), g' (x) E HA([a, b]) and that (18.25) holds. Besides this (18.31)
where <J(x, s) = sinrar g' (s) J(x - u) -a(u - s) a- 1 h(s, u)du and :r:
•
Proof. Let us show first that
(18.32)
328
4.
CHAPTER
Let /(z) =
OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
I:+;g'P , cp E Lp . In accordance with Theorem 2.3 we shall show that (18.33)
We have
u du f g'(s)cp(s)ds 1 f h-a (z) = r (a) r (1 - a) (z - u) a [g(u ) - g(s)p - a z:
a
a
J cl(z, s)cp(s)ds. z:
=
(18.34)
a
Since sin a 1r
c)( z , s) = --g'(s) 1r
1
j0 ea- 1 (1 - e)- ah(s, s + (z - s)e)de , z:
we see that cl(s, s) = [g'(s)] a and so cl(z, s) = [g'(s)] a + J '
(18.35)
a•�:·•>du. Substituting
this into (18.34) and interchanging the order of integration we arrive at the equality
ft - a (z) =
J tf;(t)dt, z:
(18.36)
a
where tf;(t) is a function
(18.31).
It is easily derived from assumptions on g(t) that
lahb�u) l � c(u - s)>.- 1 , so we see from (18.35) that Ia•�:·•> I � c(z - s)>.- 1 too.
Consequently tf;(t) E Lp (a, b), and then both conditions (18.33) hold by Thereby the conditions (18.32) is proved which gives the imbedding
(18.36) . ( 18.37)
since 1f; E Lp . Equation (18.31) is a Volterra integral equation with respect to a function cp(t) . In view of (18.25) this equation is solvable in Lp for any function tf;(z) E Lp - see for example, the book by Kolmogorov and Fomin [1 , p.461] for p = 2 and the paper by Zabreiko [1] for arbitrary p > 1. This means that (18.37) in fact gives the relation I:+;g (Lp ) = I:+ (Lp )· The theorem is thus proved. •
§ 18. GENERALIZATIONS OF RIEMANN-LIOUVILLE INTEGRALS
b=
We shall single out the case g( 00' and denote
329
x) = xu (as in Erdelyi-Kober operators) , taking
I-a ;z:"
( 18. 38) ( 18.39)
The operator of fractional differentiation, inverse to
n
(18.38), has the form
= [Re a] + 1.
(18.40)
The operators
(18.4 1) are similarly written down in terms of formulae
(18.16'):
(18.1)-(18.4). We note the analogues of the
(18.41') 18.3. Hadamard fractional integro-differentiation Riemann-Liouville fractional integro-differentiation is formally a fractional power ( d/ dx of the differentiation operator and is invariant relative to translation if considered on the whole axis. Hadamard suggested a construction of fractional integro-differentiation which is a fractional power of the type ( d�) This construction is well suited to the case of the half-axis and is invariant relative to dilation. Thus Hadamard
)a
d/dx
[1]
x a.
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
330
introduced fractional integrals of the form
�+ cp = f ( a) fo t {Incp(t)dt f) t - a '
x > 0, a > 0.
( 18 . 42)
ta �- 'P = f(a) f t {lncp(t)d l �) - '
x > O, a > O,
( 18.43 )
1
Ot
X
The integrals
1
Ot
00
x
may be similarly defined. It is convenient to represent the operators form (see the notation (5.5))
3'± 'P in the ( 18.44 )
Hadamard fractional integrals.
We shall call the expressions in (18.42)-(18.44) IT6f f ( 6x) , 6 > 0, is a dilation operator, then obviously
=
If
( 18.45 ) It is clear that ( 18.42) is a fractional integral of the form ( 18.24) with the function so that Hadamard fractional integration ( 18.42) is a "fractional integral of a function by a function ln " . However, the condition of the existence of a continuous derivatives which was assumed in § 18.2, does not hold in this case. So the integrals ( 18.42)-(18.43) need to be independently considered. (The continuity of would be satisfied if we take the lower limit of integration to be equal to a > 0 instead of zero, but then the property of invariance of the integral relative to dilation would be broken.) It is easily seen that operators are connected with the well familiar Riemannt x rp(e )dt (x.:.t )1-a and Liouville operators I� via change of variables: a ) = r(1a ) - oo similarly for j� cp. So the relation
g(t) = In t,
cp
g(t) = t g'(t),
g'(t)
3'±
(3'+ cp)(e
Jx
( 18.46) is valid. The connection ( 18.46) allows us to extend various properties of operators I�
§ 18. GENERALIZATIONS OF RIEMANN-LIOUVILLE INTEGRALS
331
to the case of operators 3'%: . Thus, observing for example that
(18 .47) where
Cp (R� ) =
(18.46) (18.46)
{ cp(t) : ilcp(t) i• � oo } , <
(18.48)
5 .3 = p/(1 - ap), 1 p 1 /a.
and the Hardy-Littlewood Theorem that the operators we conclude from 3'%: are bounded from £p (R�) into £q (R�) with q if < < We see also from that operators 3'%: admit the semigroup property
(18.49) a cp Hadamard fractional integrals aa+ r - f(1a) J cp()t)l- a dtt , x > a >_0, a{ f b cp(t) dt 1 b, 3'ab -
under appropriate assumptions on a function We may also consider
and exponents and {3. of the form
X
3'
t/'J
--
In
x
so that
In
O
<X<
(18.50) (18.51)
3'0+ = 3'f. and 3'� - = 3'� . Similarly to (18 .46) we have
(18. 52) with
a1 = Ina and bt = In b.
By direct verification we obtain the properties
d Ua'1:ct++l = l>�aa+ , -x .!!_l>b�a+ i. - l>�ba- , Rea > 0. (18.53) dx dx The Hadamard fractional derivative, introduced similar to the Riemann-Liouville X
332
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
fractional derivative, has in accordance with
( )
(18.53) the form
[a]+ l V�l� z dzd a-�- { a } I
= a-�- { a}
(Z ) [a]+l I :Z
,
a > 0,
(18.54)
where [a) is an entire part of a, and { a} = a - [a], and fractional derivatives 'D� I, 'D�+ and 'D6_ being written down similarly. In particular, if 0 < a < 1, we have :z:
d
J
(18.55)
The derivative (18.55) is easily transformed to a form, analogous to Marchaud fractional derivative (5.57). Namely, operating as in (5.56) or using (18.46), we may transform (18.55) to the form
1
a (z) - (tz) dt - r (1 - a) j l l ln tpl+ a t ' 0
(18.56)
provided that l (z) is a sufficiently good function. As for the fractional integral (18.43), its corresponding fractional differentiation is 00
/(X) - f( t) dt . 'D a- I = r a (l - a) J ( In �) l+ a t :z:
If a � 1, an analogue of the Marchaud fractional derivative introduced by the formula
(18.56') (5.80) is to be
(18.57) As for the fractional derivatives
'D�+ I with a > 0, in the case 0 < a < 1 we
§ 18. GENERALIZATIONS OF RIEMANN-LIOUVILLE INTEGRALS
333
have 3:
f(x) - f(t) dt I + !. 1 +a t a r (1 - a In !.)
f(x)
a
1)aa+ f - r (1 - a) ( a instead of (18.56) ( cf. (13.2)). _
) a (In t )
(18.58)
Finally we note that the action of Hadamard fractional integra-differentiation on power function is given by the formulae
(18.59) (18.60)
�±
where - oo < a < oo, being understood as obtained by simple calculations.
1'>±, if a < 0. These formulae are
18.4. One-dimensional modification of Bessel fractional integro-differentiation and the spaces L;
H'·P
=
Operators of Riemann-Liouville fractional integration, considered on the whole axis, have as we know, a certain disadvantage: they do not keep the spaces Lp (R1 ) invariant and they are not defined within the frames of these spaces for all values of a. In some questions, for example in the theory of Sobolev type spaces of fractional smoothness it would be convenient to deal with such fractional integration operators which are defined in Lp (R1 ) for all a > 0 and are bounded in Lp (R1 ) for all p such that 1 p oo. The way to define such operators is suggested by the picture in Fourier transforms. We introduce a convolution operator
$ $
Ga l() =
I00 Ga (x - t)I(.J(t)dt,
(18.61)
-oo which is defined in the Fourier transform by the equality
Rea > 0 - (7.1)
(18.62)
and (12.23), (12.24). The function G a (x ) , whose Fourier transform is ( 1 l x l 2 ) -a / 2 , is evaluated in terms of Bessel functions. That is why the operator (18.61) is called an operator of Bessel fractional integration (or Bessel potential). This operator is discussed in more detail in § 27. Such an operator plays an essential role in the theory of fractional differentiation of functions of many variables. It may be used in the case of function of one variable, but the specific character of the one-dimensional case allows us to define similar fractional
+
334
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
integrals of simpler nature. Specifically we shall introduce modifications Bessel potential (18.61)-(18.62) which are defined by the equalities G-a ±
- (l =FIix)a
of the (18.63)
instead of (18.62). It is implied that a branch of the power function in (18.63) is chosen as in (5.27). By (7.9) we find that the operators may be represented as convolutions with elementary functions:
G±
(18.64) so that
1 e - (z - t ) r.p(t) dt a+a - -r (a) J ( x - t ) l - et ' z
- oo
aa = _1_ -
r(a )
00
J z
(18.65)
ez- t r.p(t) dt . ( t - x p-a
The operators ( 18.65) are defined by Theorem 1.4 on functions r.p ( x) E Lp ( R 1 ), 1 � p � oo , if Re a > 0. We observe that (18.62) and (18.63) yield the relation
(18.66) For fractional operators ±
G± simple differentiation formulae
d aa - ca-l aa dx ± ± - ±' Re a > 1,
(18.67)
are valid. They are generalized in the form
(18.68) E being the identity operators. The Fourier transform and may also integrals (18.65).
be
validity of these formulae is easily seen using established by direct differentiation of the
§ 18. GENERALIZATIONS OF RIEMANN-LIOUVILLE INTEGRALS
335
In view of the representations
( 18.69) it follows from
(5.15) that {18.70)
Rea > 0 2.6.
> 0,
where and Re,8 so that each of the families of operators {G+ }a> O and { G� }a>O forms a semigroup in Lp(R 1 It is continuous, which may be verified as in Theorem Let us introduce the corresponding fractional derivatives as operations inverse by to Bessel fractional integration, i.e. to Since G�lJ 1 = 1 the realization of the operators (GfJ becomes evident. Let < < Operators (J±) - 1 which admit both Liouville and Marchand form, are defined correspondingly
).
{ - e=fx (I±)- 1e±x 0 a 1.
{18.65).
{18.69),
= r {l 1- a) and similarly for
(E - V)af, and
X e x - (t) (E + !!._) dx I -(x( -t)�t>t)a dx
{18.71)
- oo
(E ± D)a��f{1 a- a) I f(x) - t1e-+taf(x =F t) dt . 00
0
{18.71} {18.72} (E±V)a f (E±D}a f {18.72)
{18. 72}
The designations in the left-hand sides of and have their obvious and coincide (under origin in Fractional derivatives the same choice of signs) with each other for "sufficiently good" functions It is easily seen that the "Bessel fractional derivative" is connected with the Marchand derivative by the relation
{18.68).
D±f
f(x) .
(18.73} where
CHAPTER·4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
336
We consider now the spaces
Ga (L,), G�(L,), G� (L,), 1 � p < oo , which consist of functions representable by the integrals (18.62) and respectively of functions cp E L,(R1 ) . They coincide with each other
(18.65)
by the Corollary of Theorem 1.6. Sometimes other notations are adopted for the space G�(L,), e.g. H a ,p or L;, which we shall also use, so that
These spaces are known as the spaces of Bessel potentials. Later on in § 27 we shall go into details while considering these spaces in the more general case of functions of many variables. Such spaces represent a widely known version of the spaces of differentiable functions with a fractional smoothness. Many investigations concern such spaces - see for example the books by Nikol'skii [6] and Besov, Il'in and Nikol 'skii [1], the references in these books, and the Bibliographical Notes to § 27 in § 29 below. In this Section we give a simple characterization of the space L; ( R 1 ) in the one-dimensional case, which is contained in the following theorem and its important corollary.
Let 0 < a < 1 and 1 < p < oo. Then f(x) E L;{R1 ) if and only if f E L,{R1 ) and (E + D)0 f E L,(R1 ) , where the "Bessel fractional derivative" is considered as an integral conditionally convergent in L,-norm:
Theorem 18.2.
(E + D) a / =
f (x ) - e - t f ( x - t) dt. lim0 l t l+a f{1 - a ) £-+ a
00
(L ,. ) £
{18.74)
The of this theorem is quite similar to those of Theorem 6.1 and 6.2 with the corresponding simplifications due to the exponentially decreasing factor; we note for example that instead of (6.6) we obtain the equality
proof
00 f(x) - :�:!(x - t) dt = I00.-••tqt)
I £
0
I = G'j.
(18.75)
§ 18. GENERALIZATIONS OF RIEMANN-LIOUVILLE INTEGRALS
337
where K (t) is the kernel (6.7).
Comparing Theorem 18.2 with Theorem 6.2 and taking into account the connection (18.73) between Bessel and Marchaud differentiation, we see that
Corollary.
(18.76) We observe that Theorem ( E + D)01 is realized as
18.2
may be extended to all values a
>
0,
if
(18.77) in correspondence with the formula (5.80) and the relation ( E + D)01 = e - x Df. e t . Sometimes, the spaces H"'•P([a, b]) are considered in the literature. These are defined as the spaces of restrictions of functions in H"'·P (R1 ) on the interval [a, b] with the norm 1 1 /IIH• · P( [a , b]) = inf l lg iiH•·P(Rl ) 1 the infimum being considered on all functions g E H"'•P (R 1 ), which coincide with f(x) on [a, b]. From the point of view of presentation in this book it is important to remark that the spaces H"'·P([a, b]) coincide in general with the spaces l01[Lp (a, b)] of fractional integrals of functions in Lp (a, b) that were studied in § 13. Specifically the following theorem holds. Theorem 18.3.
Let 0 < a < 1/p and 1 < p < oo. Then (18.78)
up to the equivalence of norms, -oo < a < b < oo. f(x) E H01•P ([a, b]). Then there exists g(x) E H01•P(R1 ) such that g(x) = f(x) as a � x � b. By (18.76) we see that g(x) E l01(Lp ) · But then f(x) E l01[Lp (a, b)] according to Theorem 13.9. Conversely, let f(x) E l01[Lp (a, b)] and let /* (x) be the continuation of this function by zero beyond the interval [a, b]. By Theorem 13.10 we have: /* (x) E J01(Lp (R1 )). Since obviously /* (x) E Lp (R1 ), by (18.76) we see that / * (x) E H01•P(R1 ). • Proof. Let
Remark 18.1. Analysis of the proof of Theorem
1/p < a < 1/p + 1 the relation
18.3
shows that in the case
(18.79)
338
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
is valid, the space n;·P ([a, b]) consisting of functions f(x) E H0•P([a, b]) such that f(a) = 0. It may be shown that in the bounding case a = 1/p { 18.78 ) does not hold and even the space H0·P ([a, b]) is not imbedded into 1�\ [Lp (a, b)]. The reason for this is in the unboundedness of the operator { 13. 27) in Lp when a = 1/p. In the case of an arbitraryk a > 1/p, but a - 1/p ;/= 1, 2, . . . , { 18.78) is true provided that the assumptions f( ) (a) = 0, k = 0, 1, . . . , [a - 1/p], are added to the definition of the space n;•P ([a, b]). 18.5. The Chen fractional integral
The points +oo and -oo do not play an equal role for Riemann-Liouville operators I±cp considered on the whole real axis . This reveals itself, for example, in the fact that the fractional integral If:cp keeps in general, decrease of the function It'( ) at =j=oo and does not keep it at ±oo {see { 7.8)) . In this subsection we consider following Chen [2] - a modification of Riemann-Liouville integration, for which the left and the right infinite points are symmetric. We fix an arbitrary point E R1 and set x
c
{ 18.80 )
where a > 0. We shall refer to { 18.80 ) as the Chen fractional integral. The expression in { 18.80) has an evident advantage in comparison with If.cp or I�cp: it is applicable to a function with any behaviour at infinity, and it may also be considered in an interval [a, b] as well, with a < < b, the end-points a and b having equal rights. Introducing the functions c
{ 0, Pc - IP = 'Pc - (x ) =
X> X<
X> IP(x ) , X <
C, C, C,
{ 18.81 )
c,
we may write down { 18.80 ) as { 18.82)
339
§ 18. GENERALIZATIONS OF RIEMANN-LIOUVILLE INTEGRALS
or in operator form (18.83)
Using (2.44) and (2.45), from (18.82) we obtain the formula (18.84)
For the functions (t) with a "sufficiently good" behaviour at infinity, for example, for
00
00 sign x - t)
(18.85) Joo lx - t i l -a Joo It is easily derived from (18.83) that the operators I'; admit the semigroup property ( 18.86) I: I�
(
-
(18.87)
In particular 1 cv: !) ( x) = r ( 1 - o: )
l
� J f(t)(x - t) -a dt,
d
-
d
cc
X > C,
(18.88)
1:
� J f(t)(t - x) -a dt, X < c,
if 0 < a < 1. In the case o: ;:::: 1 it is necessary to use (2.30) and (2.31). We observe that obviously (V� J)(x) =
1:
[sign (x - c)]n j(n ) (x),
n
= 0, 1, 2, . . .
Justification of1 this inversion, i.e . the relation v� I';
=
(18.89) 0:
>
0,
for
340
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Recalling the expression for fractional derivatives in Marchand form, - (13.2) and (13 .5) - we come from (18.88) to max(x , e)
dt
/(z) - f( t ) ( 18.90) r (1 - a) min(x,e) I lz - t ! 1 + a in the case 0 < a < 1. The passage from ( 18.88) to (18.90) is possible with "sufficiently good" functions - see § 13.1. Let us denote the right-hand side in ( 18.90 ) by (D� /)(x), so that for "sufficiently good" functions we have a
/(z) (Vea /)(z ) = r ( 1 - a) z - c a + l i
(V� /)(x)
= (D� f )(x) .
(18.91 )
This right-hand side (D� f)(x) may be transformed to (D ae / )(x) = r a- a) (
1
00
I 0
f (x) - fe+ (x - t ) - fe - ( X + t ) t d t1 + a (
18.92) where D% is Marchand fractional differentiation (5.57)-(5.58) and the notations (18.81) are used. We may write down the derivative (D� f)(x) in the form similar to (18.92) in the case a � 1, if we use (5.80), which leads to the representation (18.93) where I > a and x(a , I) is a normalizing factor (5.8 1). We now put a natural question: what is the influence of the choice of the point c upon Chen fractional integration? Do the operators I�
§ 18. GENERALIZATIONS OF RIEMANN-LIOUVILLE INTEGRALS
Lp ( -oo, b),
341
1 < p < 1 /a , for some b. Then c
(18.94) where vc(x) = 1 for x > c and vc(x) = cosa1r for x < c and 1/Jc(x) E Lp (-oo, b). If
< X < b,
•
Lemma 18.2.
IS
The operator
Nc = Pc+ + cos a1rPc- + sin a1rSPc- , is invertible in the space Lp (R1 ) , 1 < p < 1 /a and
(18.95)
N; 1 = Pc+ + cos a1rPc- -sin a1rS�Pc-, where s� is a singular operator of the type (11. 39): a
(18.96)
00
(18.97)
Proof. For the sake of simplicity we take c = 0, and denote Pc± = P± and S� =1 Sa. The operators (18.95) and (18.96) have the form No = P+ + AP_ and N0 = P++BP_, where A
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
342
reciprocally inverse on the half-axis, i.e . P_ AP_ BP_ cp = P_ BP_ AP_ cp = P_ cp, cp E Lp (R 1 ),
(18.99)
1 < p < 1/a.
Multiplying in (18.98) and using (18.99) we see that (18.98) is reduced to the relations P+ BP_ + P+ AP_ BP_ = 0 and P+ AP_ + P+ BP_ AP_ = 0. Substituting here the expressions for A and B, we transform these equalities to (18.100) (J8.101)
Their validity is checked by direct calculation of left-hand sides by means of the Poincare-Bertrand formula (11.9). In fact, we have already obtained (18.101) earlier (11.47); we also remark that (18.100) follows from (18.101) because a (P ra P_ SP_ Sa P- = + S- a P_ SP_ )ra , where Ta l{) = l x l
-
Theorem 18.4. Let f(x)
be representable as f (x) = ( I�
f (x) = ( ldt/J )(x),
1 < p < 1/a,
f(x) = f(d) + (Idt/J)(x),
p>
(18.102)
1/a,
(18.103)
whatever the point d is, where t/J(x) E L�oc (R1 ) . If
sin t/J(x) = Ned/{) = Vcd(x)
0: 71"
--
sm t/J(x) = Ncd/{) = Vcd(x)
d
I I
t - d a
def
•
def
d
0: 71"
--
1r
_
p>
--
1/a,
--
(18.104)
t - d a - 1
I I
--
(18.105)
§ 18. GENERALIZATIONS OF RIEMANN-LIOUVILLE INTEGRALS
343
where E (c, d), x ¢ (c, d), l-'cd(x) = sign [(x - c)(c - d)].
Q7r7 lied (X) - { COS 1, _
X
Proof. Let <,o(x) and ,P(x) b e arbitrary functions in Lp (R1 ), 1 < p < 1/a, at first.
By Lemma 18.1 we have I�
(18.106) It is evident that
Nc - Nd = (cos a1r - 1)Pcd +sina1rSPcd, where
cd <,O - { <,o(x), 0,
p (we take
d < c to be definite).
_
x E (d, c), x ¢ (d, c)
So
(18.107)
S�Pd_SPcd
The calculation of a composition by applying the PoincarC-Bertrand formula (11.9) and then using (11.46), gives after simple transformations
Substituting this into 1)Pcd + sin
(cosa1r -
(18.107)
we arrive at the relation
Ni 1 (Nc - Nd)
a1rS�Pcd· Thereby from (18.101) we have c t-d sin a1r _1 t/J = Nd Nc<,o =
--
--
a
<,o(t)dt --, t-x
=
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
344
which coincides with
(18.104).
So the identity
(18.108)
is proved. This gives (18.102) and (18.104) for functions E Lp(R1), 1 < p < 1/o:. Since the operators 1: and Id have variable upper and lower limits of integration, (18.102) uses the values of the function on a finite interval only ( via (18.104)). Realizing that each function E L�oc coincides on each interval with some function in Lp(R1 ) , we see that (18.102) with the function (18.104) is valid for E L�oc too. It remains to consider the case p > 1/ a. In virtue of the imbedding L�oc C L�oc , r < 1/o:, the representation (18.102) with the function in (18.104) holds again but we cannot state that '¢ E Lp , because the operator Ncd is unbounded in Lp, when > 1/p. So we transform the function in (18.104) to a new form. We take < c and for > we have
o:
d
t d
. - d) t - d a- 1 + It - dja- 1 (t - x) , t - d a = sign(x I z - dI I x - d � lx - dla which is directly confirmed. Therefore
.,P(z) = .,P (x) + -
Observing that
sin 0:1r 1r
l x - dla j(t - d)a- l
1
d
f(x) is continuous in the case p > 1/o: and so J (t - d)a -l
/(d)f(o:), we see that
d
by (18.84). Thereby we have transformed (18.102) to (18.103). It remams to note that the singular operator in (18.105) is bounded in Lp , p > 1/o: by Theorem 11.3. •
18.6. Dzherbashyan 's generalized fractional integral We consider the case of the interval integral may be written down as
(0, 1].
The Riemann-Liouville fractional
§ 18. GENERALIZATIONS OF RIEMANN-LIOUVILLE INTEGRALS
(I�+ IP)(x) =
1
r�:) f !f'(xt)(1 - t) 0 - 1 dt, 0
X>
345
(18.109)
0.
1
Let us generalize (18.109) replacing the function ( 1 �(�)- by an arbitrary (integrable) function, but neglecting the factor X 0 • Specially, following Hadamard [1] and Dzherbashyan [4] , [5] we introduce the operator
M.M.
J 1
(L (w)
(18.1 10)
0
where the function w(x) C([O, 1]) is supposed to satisfy the following assumptions: 1) w(x) is monotone, 2) w( O) = 1, w(1) = 0, w(x) f; 0 as 0 < x < 1,
E
3) w'(x) E L 1 (0, 1). Condition 3) implies that the operator (18.110) is well defined on bounded functions
1 �w (Jl) = - J0 t 11 w'(t)dt, which in the case Jl > 0 may be replaced by
J 1
�w (Jl) = Jl t11 - 1 w(t)dt.
(18.112)
0
So an applications of the operator power series
L (w )
to functions
00
is straightforward:
representable by
(18.1 13)
(L (w )
( 18.1 14)
00
346
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
The following lemma generalizes Lemma 15.4.
The series (18.1 13) and ( 18. 1 14) have equal radii of convergence.
Lemma 18.3.
Proof. To prove the lemma we shall show that lim k-+oo
\Idw (k) = 1 .
( 18. 1 15)
By ( 18. 112) we have
k(1
- c) k- 1
j w(t)dt ::; dw (k) ::; k j w(t)dt, 1
1
1 -£
k = 1 , 2, . . . ,
0
whatever c > 0 is. Using assumptions 1) and 2) we see that 1 - c 1 then, which yields ( 18.115) . •
::; )im \Idw (k) ::; .. - oo
Relation ( 18. 1 1 1) shows how the generalized differentiation, M (w) , inverse to L (w) : M (w) L (w)
JJ
M.M.
We restrict ourselves to a statement, proved by Dzherbashyan [5] , that each function w(t) admits a non-decreasing bounded function aw (x) such that
j 1
(M(w)
Remark 18.2.
M.M. Dzherbashyan [4] , [5] considered the operators L(w)
m
a
more general form
L(w) 'P =
-
{I
}
d� z
j 1
p(t) = t w(x) x2 dx t
under weaker assumptions than given in 1)-3). For simplicity we dealt with the operator L (w) in the form (18.1 10).
§ 19. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF PERIODIC FUNCTIONS
347
§ 1 9 . Weyl Fractional Integrals and Derivatives of Periodic Functions The usual forms I�+ or Ib- for the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral prove to be inconvenient in the theory of trigonometrical series which deals with periodic functions. It is natural that the operation of fractional integro-differentiation is to be defined in such a way that it transforms periodic functions into periodic ones. Riemann-Liouville fractional integro-differentiation does not have this property. So, for periodic functions another definition of fractional integro-differentiation, suggested by Weyl, is used. It will be thoroughly treated in this section.
19. 1 . Definitions. Connections with Fourier series Let
�
(19 . 1)
be its Fourier series. Throughout this section, while dealing with fractional integration, we shall consider functions having zero mean value: 2?r 0
2'11"
(19.2)
0
i.e. we "throw away" constants while considering fractional integrals of periodic functions. Let us recall that a convolution 2'11"
(A
(19.3)
0
of two periodic functions is represented by the Fourier series
(A
(19.4)
�
ak �c k {a } = - oo operator A.
x). The a(x)ofandthe
and <,01: are Fourier coefficients of the functions where sequence is sometimes called a Fourier multiplier
00
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
348
Since
H . Weyl, such that
,_
E ( ik )n
1:= - oo
( 19.5) where ( 19.2) is taken into account. Similarly fractional differentiation is defined:
v�01>
00 (±ik)01ipk eikz
E
(19.6)
k = - oo
- compare with formulae (7.1) and (7.4) . Thus the requirement that fractional integrals and derivatives of 21r-periodic function are again 21r-periodic function is fulfilled. In ( 19.5)-(19.6) = in correspondence with (7.3). Owing to ( 19.3)-( 19.4) the definition ( 19.5) may be interpreted as
(±ik)01 l k l01 e± �signl:
Ii01)
0
where
w±a
=
"'"'' L
oo
1::-oo
e il:t
00
___ = 2 "'"' L
(±ik)a k=l
cos
(k t
a > 0,
( 19.7)
=f a 1rI 2 )
(19.8)
ka
The dash indicates that the term k = 0 is omitted. The right-hand side in (19.7) will be called the Weyl fractional integral of order a . It is known - Zygmund [6, p.201) - that the series ( 19.8) convergence for all t (0, 21r), if a > 0. The functions ..P± may be expressed in terms of the generalized Riemann zeta function (1 .87):
E
( 19.9) according to the Hurwitz formula ( 1.88) . Equation (19.9) is contained implicitly in the representations ( 19.11) and (19. 12) proved below. In the case of an integer a = 1 , 2, . . . the functions 'li±(t) may be represented by (1 .89) as 0 < t < 21r,
Bm (t) being the m-th Bernoulli polynomial.
( 19. 10)
§ 19. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF PERIODIC FUNCTIONS
349
In view of ( 19.5) it is clear that J'; > f.f> tp = I'±_a+fJ ) tp under the same choice of signs. We observe that the case of integer a = 1, 2, 3, . . . corresponds to usual integration. This implies the choice of a primitive having zero mean value over the period. Thus, in fact, it is sufficient to study mainly the case 0 < a < 1 . We concentrate in detail on the ''left-hand sided" fractional integral noting that 9� (t) = •+( -t). Lemma 19.1.
I�a) tp
The function 'i"+(t) in the case 0 < a < 1 has the form 21r + 1 + ra ( t ) , + = r (a) t a-
�y, ... a (t )
( 19.11)
where the function ( 19 .12)
is infinitely differentiable for t E ( -21r, 21r] . Proof. We write
( 19. 13) and we have to show that G(t) = •+(t) for -21r < t :5 21r. For this purpose it is sufficient to show (in view of (19.8)) that the Fourier coefficients of the function G(t) coincide with (ik)- a :
_!__ J G(t)e-ilct dt = 211'
G�c =
21r
0
(ik)- a .
( 19. 14)
To show this we shall prove the formula 00
G(t) = L g(t + 21rm), m =-oo
( 19.15)
350
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
where the function g(t) is defined by the equation
[
1 g(t) = f21r ( a. ) t a+- 1 - 2..
2(m+1 ) 11'
j
21rm
]
a-1 ds "+
21rm � t < 2(m + 1)1r, m = 0, ±1, . . . Equation (19.15) is verified directly if we take into account that (21r) a - l n a fa = 2(n +l ) 11' 2n11' l cJt and that I t a- l dt 0 as n oo. at I 2� 0 2n 11' The function g(t) is absolutely integrable over R 1 . In fact
as
--+
--+
� J lg(t) !dt = � r (a) :::0 J oo
2(m+l ) r
-00
-
2m11'
Applying here the mean value theorem for m 2:: oo
Joo lg(t) idt :5
-
Ct
+ C2 f:
� Ct + ca smce
e = ecp
_.!.._ J
t a- l 21r
2m11'
sa - l ds dt
1 we obtain
2(m+l ) 11' 2(m+l ) 11'
J 2m11'J ea-2dsdt
00L ma-
m=l 2m11'
2
< oo ,
m=l
00 I lg(t + 2m1r) ldt = I lg (t) ldt
E00 (2m1r, 2m1r + 21r). 211'
2(m+1 ) 11'
The absolute integrability of
g(t)
and
show that (19.15) absolutely L: m= - oo 0 0 converges for almost all t. We use the known fact that the convergence of the series the equation
b
L: I lfm (t) l dt implies the almost everywhere convergence of the series L: lfm (t) l; a
Zygmund
(5, p.49].
-
It is known - Zygmund (5, p . l l 6] - that Fourier coefficients for the sum of a series (19.15) coincide with Fourier transform of the function g(t) at the points k = 0, ±1, . . , i.e. Gk = g(k) , where g(x) is the Fourier transform (1.104). .
§ 19. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF PERIODIC FUNCTIONS
Consequently
Gk
= 27r J e g (t)dt = oo
1
-i kt
-oo
1 " r (a) ffl�OO 00
[
351
2(m+ l }lr 2(m+ l}lr J ta- l - 2� J sa+- l ds 2m?r 2mlr II
]
e -i k tdt
since the integral of e-i k t over the period is zero, if k =/; 0. Using the value of the above integral, which was calculated in (7.6), we arrive at (19.14). It is left to state that the infinite differentiability of the function is easily seen from (19.12) and f: + being evident constants,
1.
with j �
Corollary.
estimates
ra (t) j l r�f>(t) = Cj m=l (t 2m7r) a- - , Cj Let I t ! ::; 1r. The functions �±(t) and their derivatives admit the j = 0, 1,2, . . .
(19.16)
By Lemma 19.1 and its corollary the definition of the Weyl fractional integral by (19.7) is correct in the sense that it is applicable to any integrable function and the integral in (19.7) exists almost everywhere and also gives an integrable function (it is clear that ± is continuous, if is) . By (19.11) we have
I cp
cp(t)
211" 1 (I+a)
z
_
0<
X ::;
27r.
x 21r,
The latter of these integrands is infinitely differentiable if 0 < < so the Weyl fractional integral (19.7) differs inessentially from the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral C± (the first summand) by differentiability properties, inner points of being in mind. The behaviour of the second integrand at the the interval (0, end points = 0 and is in general the same as the first. It is natural to define the Weyl fractional derivative in the case 0 < a < 1 by the equality
I cp 21r) x x = 21r
v<±a> I = ±i_I dx ±(t -a) I
(19.17)
352
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
in complete correspondence with (19.6). Equation (19.17) may be called the Weyl-Liouville derivative in comparison with the expression
n�> I =
2r -a 2� j [l(z - t) - l(z)] w i (t)dt,
!
0
(19.18)
which might be called the Weyl-Marchaud derivative, cf. (5.57) and (5.58). The right-hand side of (19.18) is obtained from that of (19.17) by formal differentiation under the integral sign and integration by parts.
Fractional derivatives (19.17) and (19.18) coincide on functions l(z) E H�([0, 27r]), ..\ > a:
Lemma 19.2.
Proof. Let
F(z) be any primitive of a function l(x). Then 2r d � V�a) I = 271" dz j q;�- a (t)d[F(x) - F(x - t)] 0
{
� l -a 2r =� 27r dx q; + (t)[F( x) - F(x - t)JI o
�
2r - !F(x) - F(x - t)] 'll �-a (t)dt }
f 0
2r = [F'(z) - F'(x - t)] ! q;�- a (t)dt = D�a) I,
J 0
where all the transformations are easily justified for of (19.16).
l(z) E H� , ..\ > a, by means
19.2. Elementary properties of Weyl fractional integrals We begin with the following lemma which is of importance throughout this section for understating the nature of the Weyl integral.
Let
Lemma 19.3.
§ 19. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF PERIODIC FUNCTIONS
353
the real line: I+( a) V' - I+a cp _
_
1 r {n)
f (zcp(t)dt - t) l - a , z
-oo
0 < Q < 1,
{19.19)
provided that the integral on the right-hand side is understood as conventionally convergent:
f z
- oo
cp(t)dt r {z - t) l -a = nnE� Z
z
cp(t)dt . - t) l - a
J {z z - 2mr
{ 19.20)
The representation by an absolutely convergent integral {19.21) is also valid. Proof.
Since the limit in {19.12) is uniform in t E [0, 2?r] from {19.11) we have
Using {19.2) and periodicity of the function cp(t), we have
r(lo) i!. f
2(n +l)r
=
n II,!,
tp(z - t)t a- l dt,
0
which gives {19.19) in accordance with {19.20). To show {19.21), it is sufficient to 2{k+l)r note that J cp(x - t)(2?rk) a - l dt = 0 for all k = [t/2?r] = 0, 1, 2, . . . • 2rk We should like to stress that the interpretation of the integral in {19.19) in terms of {19.20) is caused by the nature of the problem and its convergence is connected with vanishing of mean value of a function cp(t) - see {19.2).
354
CHAPTER 4 . OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
There exists a connection of the type { 1 1 .10) and { 11 . 1 1) between the fractional integrals I�a) cp and I�a > cp. To formulate it we introduce the singular integral with the Hilbert kernel Hcp =
1 21r
2r
J cp(t)ctg -2-dt x-t
( 19.22)
0
taken in the principal values sense which connects conjugate Fourier series Zygmund [5, p.88) -
cp -
Theorem 19.1.
00
L tpA:e i b:' l:= - oo
Hcp - -i
00
E'
l:=- oo
sign k cp l: e i b .
( 19.23)
Let cp(t) E Lp (O, 2n-), 1 < p < oo . Then { 19.24)
l+( a) tTn = cos an- l ( a )tn - sin an-H la - ) tnT l -
T
( 19.25)
Proof. It is known that the operator H is bounded in Lp {O, 2n-), 1 < p < oo , by the Riesz theorem - Zygmund [1, p.404). The operators Iia) are also bounded in Lp (O, 2n-), 1 � p < oo {since w� (t) E L 1 ). So it is sufficient to verify equations (19.24) and ( 19.25) on the set of infinitely differentiable functions which is dense in Lp (O, 21r). Fractional integration may be written as (19.5) on such functions, cas r sin r(-isign l: · · · t to prove the equation · IS · sufficien 1 · so It ( - ik)a - ( ik a)a + a (ik)a ) m view of (19.23). This equality is obvious. Similarly ( 19.25) is verified. • _
19.3. Other forms of fractional integration of periodic functions We may introduce an analogue of the Riesz potential {12.1) for periodic functions. Starting from { 12.23) we must define it in such a way that
( 19.26)
§ 19. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF PERIODIC FUNCTIONS
Since
355
l k la = 2 cos(�,.-72)[(ik)a + (-ik)a], we may introduce J(a)
where
-q;a (t) = '��2i.cos(t) (+a1r'll/2)� (t) = 2 f: coskakt . 1: = 1
( 19.28)
a = J(a+fJ),
Similarly to Weyl fractional integration (19.7) the operator (19.27) of the Riesz potential type satisfies the semigroup property J( ) J(f3) which is evidently seen from ( 19.26). Equations ( 19.24) and (19.25) after simple transformations give the following relations between the operator J( a) and fractional integration J�a) :
= cos(a1r/2) I�a)
( 19.29) ( 19.30)
( 19.31) a fractional integration operator of order a. The constant c in s19.31) may be allowed to have different values as � +oo or � -oo. 1r and J( a ) are examples of such operators. They satisfy the semigroup property but have the drawback that they are convolutions with non-elementary functions. Conversely, we may construct convolutions with elementary functions with the property (19.31) but without the semigroup property. Thus, for example the operator with Jf )
k
211"
a
an
expansion
0
[sin(x -e>1+-1
I�a )
a�: =
k
t+-1
e - i V + (-1) A: e iV r (�) . 2 1 +a r ( k ± �+ a )
[
( 19.32)
by formula 2.5.12.36 from Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev 1] . The condition (19.31) is satisfied then in view of ( 1 .66). However, the semigroup property is not valid as may be seen from ( 19.32).
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
356
We call attention to a two-parameter family of fractional integration operators
211' I�a) 'P = j I
where
Ka,JJ (X ) - � cos(kxka- p7r/2) . _
L...,
k=l
Such operators are used in the approximation theory of periodic functions Bibliographical Notes in § 23.1 (notes to § 19.3) and § 23.2 (note 19.6). Simple transformations give the formula
So the operator
I£a) is a linear combination of Weyl fractional integration operators:
JJJ(a)'P - sin[(JJsin+a1ra)7r/2] /a)+ 'P + sin[(asin-a1rp)7r/2] /a)rp. _
-
Here one may evidently see the analogy with Feller potentials which we considered in § 12 for a non-periodic case - see (12.10) and (12.13). It is obvious that = and =
Iia) I+ I�c:2 I�a) .
19.4. The coincidence of Weyl and Marchaud fractional derivatives It follows from Lemma 19.3 and definition (19.17) that the Weyl fractional derivative (19.17) coincides with the Riemann-Liouville derivative
v+(a) I - r(1 1- a) dxd f (xf(t)dt - t)a ' z
0
1,
(19.33)
-oo
provided that
(
2J11' f(t)dt = 0 and the integral in {19.33) is treated in the sense 0
of 19. 20 ). The conventional convergence of the integral in (19.33) at infinity is essential. We shall show that the use of the Weyl-Marchaud form (19.18) of fractional differentiation allows us to avoid conventional convergence. Let us prove
357
§ 19. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF PERIODIC FUNCTIONS
,the formula 2'll'
� J [f(x - t) - f(x)] d� 'lf�- a (t)dt
2
0
= -
for 21r-periodic functions
a
f(x) -l+f(x - t) dt j t a f(1 - a) 00
(19.34)
0
f(x), i.e. D(a)+ =- D+a f.
(19.35)
: Although both integrals in (19.34) are to be interpreted in general as conventionally ' �onvergent at = 0, the chief thing to stress now is that the integral on the right-hand side is "good" at infinity: it converges absolutely as -+ 00 and this
t
2'll'
. does not require the condition J 0
t
f(t)dt = 0.
For the exact interpretation of "truncated" derivative
(19.34)
we introduce the corresponding
2'll'
D�� f = 2� J [f(x) - f(x - t)] ! 'lf�- a (t)dt (19.36) £ and let D+ ,£ f be the truncation of the right-hand side of (19.34), which is familiar by (5.59). We observe that D+, £ f is a 27r-periodic function, if f(x) is such a �
function.
Let f(x) E Lp (O, 27r), 1 � p < The truncated fractional derivatives D���f and D+,£ f converge (for almost all x in Lp (O, 21r)} simultaneously and
Lemma 19.4.
oo.
(19.37)
Proof. The following equation is valid: 00
D�! f D+,£ f - a£f(x) + j b£(t)f(x - t)dt, =
{19.38)
0
E [{2m7r) - a a£ is the sum of the series a£ = r(l:a) m=l {27rm + e)- a ] and the function b£(t) is defined b£(t) = r(l�a) t- l - a when 00
where the constant
as
358
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
2m1r � t < 21rm + c, m = 1, 2, . . . and be ( t ) = 0 beyond these intervals. Equation (19.38) is obtained from (19.36) by direct manipulations which are similar to those in the proof of Lemma 19.3, and by using
d ,y, l - a (t ) = 21ra "" (t 2m1r) - a- 1 ' dt + - r(1 - a) �0 + 00
0 < t < 2 11".
'.r
The latter is derived from (19.11) and ( 19. 12). It is clear that ae --+ 0 as c --+ 0. Further,
be (t) E L 1 (0, oo)
00
and J be ( t ) dt
0
=
ae --+ 0. So the second and the third terms on the right-hand side of (19.38) tend to zero - both almost everywhere and in Lp (O, 21r) - which completes the proof. • Limits (19.37) do exist on functions f(x) E H>.. , � > a (or f(x) E n; , � > a, see § 19.7). We note also that all considered forms of fractional differentiation coincide with each other on such functions:
Remark 19.1.
( 19.39) The latter of these equalities follows from Lemma 19.4, the former was established earlier in Lemma 19.2.
19.5. The representability of periodic functions by the Weyl fractional integral
f(x) be a 21r-periodic function, x E R1 . We shall show that the convergence in Lp (O, 21r) of the truncated Marchaud derivative Let
(D a f)(x) £
= r(1 a- a)
j f(x) -t l +f(xa - t) dt' 00
0<
x < 211",
( 19.40)
is equivalent to the representability of a function /( x) by the Weyl fractional integral of a function in Lp(O, 21r). Namely, the following theorem is true.
Let 0 < a < 1 . If f E X2 r , where X2r = Lp (O, 21r), 1 � p < oo or X211' = C(O, 21r), then the following statements are equivalent: 1) there exists a function tp(x) E x2 11" such that l i D + e: f - �PIIx:h 0; 2 11" 2) f(x) = /o + I�a) tp, where tp E X2 1r and fo = 2� J f(x)dx. In the case 0 X2.- = Lp(O, 21r), 1 < p < oo these assertions are also equivalent to 3) II D + ,e /llp � c, where c does not depend on c.
Theorem 19.2.
,
'
,
--+ t: -+ 00
§ 19. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF PERIODIC FUNCTIONS
359
Proof. Without loss of generality we may take fo = 0. Let 2) be satisfied. Then f(x) = I+
(D + ,e f)(x) = j K(t)
( 19.41)
0
with the kernel K(t) E L 1 (0, oo ) . Although this formula was derived for
o ct) - f(x - h - ct)]dt where Ah is the operator (6.22). Again it is easily established
that this equality holds in our 21r-periodic case. Following the same arguments as in § 6.3 - see the reasonings after (6.23), where the Lq {R 1 )-convergence is to be replaced by x2 ,..- convergence - we obtain
Here the integral I+
2I11"
having identically coincident differences, may differ only by a constant, we have ( 19.42) because of the assumption /o = 0. The limit in ( 19.42) is taken in X2,.. . Equation ( 19.42) yields statement 2). The validity of 3) in the case 1) is obvious. In the case when 3) is satisfied, arguments are also similar to the proof of Theorem 6.3 in the part concerning the condition (6.19). • It is time to observe that I�a) [Lp (O, 21r)) = I�a) [Lp (O, 21r)] in the case 1 < p < oo and a > 0. This follows from { 19.24) and { 19.25) , since the operator H commutes with I�a) and I�a) and is bounded in Lp . It follows also from {19.29) and { 19.30) that If ) (Lp ) = J ( a) (Lp ) for p > 1 . So we have ( 19.43)
360
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Remark 19.2. Theorem
19.2 gives a characterization of the space J(a) (Lp )
in terms of left-hand sided truncated Marchand fractional differentiation in the case 0 < a < 1. It may be extended to the case of an arbitrary a > 0 by means of the construction (5.80) of the Marchand derivative. Namely, let
( 19.44) where I > a and the constant is given in (5.81). Then Theorem 19.2 is valid for all a > 0, if D+,�: in its formulation implies (19.44) with the choice I > a. We omit the proof but observe that a non-periodic analogue of this statement will be proved for functions of many variables in § 27 (see Theorem 27.3). We conclude this subsection with the following theorem.
A function f(x) representable by a fractional integral:
Theorem 19.3.
E
Lp (O, 211"), 1
f(x) = fo + /.; ) cp, r.p E Lp (O, 211")
� p <
(or
oo
(or C(O, 211")) is
C(O, 21r)),
( 19.45)
if and only if there exists a function g(x) E Lp (O, 211") {or C(O, 211") respectively} such that (iky � fk = 9k , k E Z , (19.46) and then g(x) = cp(x). In case p > 1 (19.46) is equivalent to (19.47) but with 1/J( x) :/; cp(x).
Proof. Let (19.45) be satisfied. Then a direct calculation of the Fourier coefficients a)
in (19.45) gives fk = (I� r.p)k = (ik)- a cpk in view of (19.45). Conversely, let g E Lp (or E C) exist such that (19.46) holds, i.e. fk = 9k /(ik) a . Then fk = (I+ g) k by (19.5). By the uniqueness theorem for Fourier series we have
To obtain (19.47) it remains for us to observe that, if p > 1, the representability a function f(x) by a fractional integral I�a) r.p, r.p E Lp , is equivalent to the representability by the Riesz potential (19.26) and (19.27) in the case p > see
(19.43).
1,
§ 19. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF PERIODIC FUNCTIONS
361
19.6. Weyl fractional integration and differentiation in the space of Holderian functions
We consider 21r-periodic functions, continuous on the whole line, thus
a
function and 0 < a < 1 . Then
lf(x + h) - f(x) l
:'5
ch J wt\�':) dt,
l f(x + h) - 2/(x) + f(x - h) l Proof.
11"
( 19.48)
h
2 :'5 ch
j wt<:_,:> dt. 11"
( 19.49)
h
Let us represent the difference f(x + h) - f(x)
as
11"
f(x + h) - f(x) = 2� j [
( 19.50)
- 11"
where the periodicity of
- 11"
I A I :'5 c J w(
- 2h :'5
Since w(
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
362
with j
= 0 we obtain I A I � cw (cp, h)
3h
j l '��+ (t) l dt
- 3h 3h � Ct w(cp, h) J t a- l dt � c2 ha w(cp, h).
{19.51)
0
As for
B, by the mean value theorem and (19. 16) with j = 0 we obtain I B I :5 ch
j
2h < ltl < ,..
� Ct h
w(
I ( � W't- ) (t Hh) l dt
w(cp, lt l )( ltl - h) a- 2 dt. J h ,..
2
Here
lt l - h � lt l /2, so IBI
,..
� ch J w(cp, t)ta- 2 dt.
( 19.52)
2h ,.. Since h aw(cp, h) � ch J w(cp, t)t a- 2 dt, the estimate ( 19.48) follows from {19.51) and 2h {19.52). To prove {19.49) we obtain, similarly to ( 19.50) , the equation f(x + h) - 2 /{x) + f(x - h) 1
=2 7r
,..
j [cp(x - t) - cp(x)][w+ (t + h) - 2w+ (t) + w+ (t - h)]dt - 'lr
Exactly in the same way
as
above we have
( 19.53) Let us estimate B1 . Equation (5.75) for finite differences and
(19.16) with j = 2
§ 19. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF PERIODIC FUNCTIONS
363
yield
( 19.54) if l t l � 2h. Note that non-centered differences were considered in (5.75), while we use a centered difference. It is easy to show what the modification of (5. 75) should be in the case of centered differences. In view of (19.54) we see that I B 1 1 is dominated by right-hand side of (19.49). Then (19.49) is established since {19.53) has already been obtained. Theorem 19.5.
•
For any continuous 21r-periodic function the estimate h
w(D� ) /, h) � c J w(f, t)t - 1 - a dt,
0
(19.55)
1,
0
is valid provided that the integral on the right-hand side converges. Proof. Let
where 8(x, h, t) = f(x + h - t) - f(x + h) - f(x - t) + f(x). Obviously, 2w(J, I t I ), and l 8(x, h, t) l � 2w(J, h). So, by {19.16) we have
l 8(x, h, t) 1 �
( 19.56) Since w( J, h)/h � 2w( J, t)/t Timan [3, p .111] - the second term in dominated by the first one which leads to (19.55). • -
Corollary.
Let f(x) be a continuous 21r-periodic function and 00
0
1.
(19.56)
is
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
364
Then
h
w(cp, h) � c j w(f, t)t_ 1 _ 01dt.
(19.57)
0
Proof. It is sufficient to recall Lemma 19.4. We consider now a generalized Holder space Ht([O , 21r]), consisting of 211" periodic functions, which are continuous on the real line, have zero mean value over the period , and are such that w(cp, t) cw(t), where w(t) is a given continuous function. This space is equipped with the norm similar to § 13.6. We point out that the lower zero index in the designation of the space Ht([O, 21r]) implies that 271" J cp(t)dt = 0, unlike the non-periodic case.
�
0
A�{[O, 211"]) denotes the space of continuous 21r-periodic functions with zero mean value such that lf(x + h) - 2/{x) + f( x - h) l � cw(h), h > 0, and is named a generalized Zygmund space. Let 1 1 /II A;r
= 1 1 / llc + sup lf(x + h) - 2/(x) + f(x - h) l/w(h). x,h
We suppose that everywhere below
(19.58) The next theorem is an immediate consequence of Theorem
19.4.
Let w(t) satisfy conditions (19.58). The operator 1�01) , 0 < o: < 1, of Weyl fractional integration is bounded from Ht([O, 21r]) into H�ar ([O, 21r]), w01 (t) = t 01 w(t), if Theorem 19.6.
j (�) w�t) dt $ cw(h), 1 -a
(19.59)
h
and from Ht([O, 21r]) into A�or ([O, 21r]) under the weaker assumption
j (�) w�t) dt $ cw(h). h 2- a
(19.60)
§ 19. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF PERIODIC FUNCTIONS
365
Corollary. The Weyl operator 1�0>, 0 < a < 1, is bounded from Ht([0 ,2 ]} into n;+a ([O, 21r]), ,\ + a < 1, and from Ht([O, 21r]) into the Zygmund space 7r A�+a = {/(z) : 1 /(z + h) - 2/(x) + f(x - h)l � ch>.+a, /o = 0} , {19.61) if ,\ + a < 2. Indeed, if w(t) = t >. , (19.59) and {19.60) are satisfied provided that ,\ + a < 1 and ,\ + a < 2 respectively. Remark 19.3. If one considers 27r-periodic functions which are in H't on [0 , 271"] , but are not necessarily continuous on the whole line, i.e. cp(O) = cp(27r) may not be true, then the statement of Theorem 19.6 is to be modified as follows
where cp.(x) is a 21r-periodic function equal to [cp{O)-cp{27r)]{cp-z)/{27r) on [0, 21r]. Remark 19.4. The corollary of Theorem 19.6 is exact in the sense that Iia)cp ¢ H 1 , in general, for cp E H� - >.. The corresponding example is the Weierstrass function - Zygmund [6, p.207]. h Theorem 19. 7. Let 0 < a < 1, let w(t) satisfy (19.58) and let J t- 1 w(t)dt � cw(h). Then the operator D� ) of Weyl-Marchaud fractional differentiation, as well as the operator D+ of Marchaud fractional differentiation, is bounded from H�"' ([0 , 27r]} into H'i)([O , 27r]). This theorem follows immediately from {19.55). Corollary. If f (x) E H>.([O , 21r]), 0 < a < ,\ � 1, then D � ) f E n; - a ([O , 21r]). In the case ,\ = 1 a somewhat stronger assertion, that stated in Corollary, is valid: A� � H� -a , where A� is the space (19.61) with ,\ + a = 1. We omit the proof, but refer to Zygmund [6, p.206]. Finally, unifying Theorem 19.6 and 19.7 we come to the following theorem in which we use the function class ()�, defined in (13.68). Theorem 19.8. Let w(t) E ()�_ 0 • Then operator 1�0>, 0 < a < 1, of Weyl fractional integration maps the space H'i) ([0 , 211"]) isomorphically onto H�"' {[0 , 27r]). Proof. If follows from assumption about w(t), that J�a) is bounded from H't into H�"' by Theorem 19.6, while D�) is bounded from H�"' into H't by Theorem 19.7 . 0
n<"'>
366
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
It only remains thus to show that 01every function f(x) E Hwet is representable by the Weyl fractional integral f(x) = 1� ) (() of a function in H� . Since H� C{[O, 21r]), by Theorem 19.2 we see that the function f(x) will be representable by the Weyl fractional integral of a function lp E C, if D+ ,e f converges in C-norm. Since C
l()
I na+
.•
, / - na+ J I :5 r( t - a) � f(x) -t t +f(x" - t) dt
l£:l
0:
.•
the convergence of D+,e in C becomes)evident. Then f = I�a) lp, lp E C{[O, 21r]), by Theorem 19.2. We know that D�) I�a lp lp, lp E L1 {[0, 21r]), so by Theorem 19.7 lp is not only in C{[O, 21r]), but also in H� . =
•
Corollary. Weyl fractional integration isomorphically maps the Holder space HG([O, 27r]), 0 < A < 1 - o: , onto the space n; +a ([O, 27r]). Indeed, w(t) = t>· E <)�- A ' if 0 < A < 1 - o: . We give also a "multiplier" paraphrase of Theorem 19.8.
Let f(x) be a continuous 21r-periodic function and let J(a ) be an operator {19.26) defined by its Fourier multiplier l k l -a . The operator J( a) isomorphically maps the space H�([O, 21r]) onto H�Ct {[0, 21r]), if w(t) E <)� - a ·
Theorem 19.81•
Proof. We recall {19.28) and {19.30). The singular operator H with Hilbert kernel is bounded in H�{[O, 21r]) under the stated assumption on w(t), which follows from the known Zygmund estimate for the conjugate( ) function -a)Zygmund [5, p . 199]. Then it follows from {19.29) and {19.30) that J a (Hw) = I� (Hw). Therefore the statement of Theorem 19.8' follows from Theorem 19.8. In conclusion of this subsection we observe that the Hardy-Littlewood Theorem 3.5 and 3.6 on the mapping properties of fractional integration in Lp are valid in periodic case for Weyl integrals too: •
I± Lp(O, 21r) ----+ L q (O, 21r),
q
= p/{ 1 - o:p)
I(et ) Lp {0, 27r) � H a- 1 /P((0, 27r]) Besides this na- 1/P((O, 21r])may
if
0 < o: < 1/p {1 < p < oo) , {19.62)
if 1/p < o: < 1/p + 1 {1 � p < oo) . {19.63) be replaced by the space ha- 1/P{(O, 21r]) {cf.
§ 19. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF PERIODIC FUNCTIONS
Corollary of Theorem 3.6). In the case a - 1/p = 1 we may state that
367
(cf. Theorem 3.6), where ..\A is the function space defined similarly to the space (19.61) with O(h) being replaced by o(h). We omit the proof of these periodic analogues (19.62) and (19.63) of Theorem 3.5 and 3.6, referring to Zygmund [6]. We observe, however, that (19.62) may be derived directly from Theorem 3.5 in view of (19.16) with j = 0. 19.7. Weyl fractional integrals and derivatives of periodic functions in H;
We give here the Hardy-Littlewood theorem on mapping properties of Weyl fractional integration and differentiation in the spaces of periodic functions satisfying the integral Holder condition. By n;([o, 21r]) we denote the space of 21r-periodic functions
j l<,o(x) -
(19.64)
0
(cf. (14.1) and (14.2)), while h;([o, 21r]) is the space defined similarly with (19.64) being replaced by (19.65) lim l<,o(x) -
u
Let 1 � p < oo, 0 < a < 1, 0 < ..\ < 1, ..\ + a < 1 and let Iia) and be Weyl fractional integro-differentiation (19.7) and (19.8). Then
Theorem 19.9.
D�a)
(19.66) (19.67) ( 19.68)
368
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
This theorem is an immediate corollary of Theorem 14.5 and 14.6 in view of the periodicity of the functions in hand. It may be shown that (19.67) and ( 19.68) are also valid in· o-form: ( 19.69) (19.70)
From+ ( 19.67) and (19.68) we conclude that the operators Iia) map n; onto n; a , A + a 1, one-to-one. Initially the problem of+ representability by the fractional integral may be solved by showing that n; a J(a)(Lp) via Theorem 19.2. Analysis of the proof of Theorem 14.6 and 14.7 makes sure that the mapping <
c
( 19.71)
is an isomorphism. 19.8. The Bernstein inequality for fractional integrals of trigonometric polynomials
Let
T.n ( X )
n
k - � LJ ak ei x k=-n
( 19.72)
be a trigonometric polynomial. The inequalities
( 19.73)
due to Bernstein, are well known Nikol'skii [6. p.94) . The following theorem presents their analogues for the case of Weyl fractional derivatives ( 19.6) . Theorem 19.10.
Any trigonometric polynomial Tn (x) admits an estimate ( 19.74)
where c( a )
= 21-a /f(2 - a).
369
§ 19. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF PERIODIC FUNCTIONS
Proof. Initially let p = By (19.39) the fractional derivative may be taken in Marchaud form, so that oo.
V(±a) T.n = f{1 a- a) J Tn (x) -tl T+na (x =f t) dt. 0 00
Hence iiTn llc + 2a f(1 - a) =f
00
J t 1+a · __!!!_ 2/ n
( 19.75)
Since ITn (x) - Tn (x t)l � t ilT� li e, by the first of the inequalities given in (19.73) we obtain from (19.75) ( 19.76)
Let 1 � p We introduce the convolution operator An cp = 2I71' Tn (x t) cp (t ) dt It is easily seen that (An cp)(x) is a trigonometrical polynomial of the same order n. With (19.76) already proved and using the Holder inequality we have < oo.
0
.
(19.77)
On the other hand (V�a) An cp)(x) = 2I71'(vr) Tn )(x - y)cp(y)dy, and then 0
(19.78)
The inequalities (19.77) and (19.78) hold for all functions1 cp E Lp' and the latter is sharp since it turns) into equality as cp(x) = lg (x) IP- sign g(x) E Lp' and a) g (x) = V� Tn . Then IIVr Tn llp � c(a)na iiTn llp· •
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
370
We note that (19.74) with 1 � p < might be obtained along the same lines as in the case p by realizing (19.75) and (19.76) in Lp-norm via the Minkowski inequality, if we use the latter of the inequalities in (19.73). The proof presented above used only the first of the inequalities in (19.73). Remark 19.5. If Tn is a trigonometrical polynomial, then V�01) Tn is again such a polynomial of the same order. Therefore, it follows from (19.74) and (19.73) that the -estimate of the form (19. 74) is valid for all a > 0 with the constant f c(a) 2 1 N OI / ( 2 + N - a), where N is the greatest integer less than a. This constant is not sharp the case a > 1. For such an a the inequality oo
= oo
=
in
(19.79) holds with the sharp constant equal to 1. This was proved byn Lizorkin [3] in a more general context of the "trigonometrical integral" Tn (x) -Jn eixtdu(t). Remark 19.6. The Bernstein inequality for fractional derivatives of almost periodic functions of the form =
m
f( x) = k=L ak eiA,.x 1 is valid in the following presentation:
( 19.80)
(19.81) with the same constant c(a) 21- 01 /f(2 - a) - Bang [1, p.2 1 22], 1941 for O < a < l. The following Favard type inequality -
=
-
( 19.82) for almost periodic functions (19.80) is close in a sense to the Bernstein type inequality (19.81); the constant depends on a, but does not depend on f(x) Bang [1]. c
-
371
§ 20. AN APPROACH VIA FRACTIONAL DIFFERENCES
§ 20. An Approach to Fractional Integro Differentiation via Fractional Differences (The Griinwald-Letnikov Approach)
It is well known that a function /(z) which is differentiable up to order n admits the formula (20.1)
where (AI! /)(z) is a finite difference (5.72) of a function /(z) . This equality may be used to define a fractional derivative by direct replacing by a > 0 in (20. 1), if we can properly interpret the difference of the fractional order. This approach to fractional differentiation and integration via fractional order differences, presented in this section, is less used in mathematical analysis in comparison with other definitions (Riemann-Liouville, Marchaud and others). However, this approach is natural from the point of view of the development of mathematical analysis and was suggested long ago by Grunwald [1] and Letnikov [1). It has recently attracted attention both from the point of view of function theory, Westphal [4] , Butzer and Westphal [1], Bredimas [1)-[5] , Neugebauer [1], Wilmes [2], Bugrov [1] , [2] and Burenkov and Sobnak [1] , and also from its convenience in computational mathematics, Zheludev [1] and Lubich [1] , for example. In § 20.2 our presentation is essentially based on the paper by Butzer and Westphal, cited above. While considering fractional order differences of a function /(z) it is natural to assume it to be given on the whole real line. If we deal only with a left- or only with a right-hand sided translation, the case of the half-line may be also considered. The case of a finite interval is specifically discussed in § 20.4. We shall treat separately the periodic and non-periodic cases. Everywhere inR this section X = X ( R1 ) denotes any of the spaces Lp(R1 ), 1�p< or C( 1) and in the periodic case X211" = X(O, 21r) denotes any of the similar spaces on [0, 21r] . n
oo ,
20. 1 . Differences of a fractional order and their properties
Given a function /(z) on the whole line, we define )
(.6.U)(z) = (E - Th a / =
�( 1) (�) /(z - kh), -
1
<>
> 0,
(20.2)
372
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
stating from (5.72) . Here (�) are the binomial coefficients (1.48). Since c(a)gl
� I(:) I <
(20.3)
co
by ( 1 .51), the series (20.2) converges absolutely and uniformly for each a > 0 and for every bounded function; if /(z) E X (X2r ) , it converges in X(X2r )-norm. We note that c(a) = 2a for integer a. The series (20.3) may be always represented as the finite sum [a] c(a) = L(1 + ( -1) k +[a]) (ak ) . (20.3') k=O Indeed, since k:O E (-1) k (:) = 0 and (:) = ( - 1)k -[a] - l l(�)l for k � [a] + 1 by L ( -1) k (�) + ( -1) 1 +[a] L I(�) I = 0, which yields ( 20.3' ) . ( 1 .48), we see that k=O k =[a]+ l It is easily derived from (20.3') that an
00
00
00
if 0 < a � 1 , 2[a] � c(a) � 2[a]+ l if a > 0. The difference (20.2) will be called a left-hand sided one, if h > 0, and a right-hand sided one, if h < 0. Remark 20.1. The difference in ( 20.2 ) is not in general defined in the case a < 0, since the series may prove to be divergent. This is the case for example if /(z) 1. Actually :tJ =O(- l)i (�) = (-1)" ( � 1) 1 f(n + 1 - a) (20.4) r(l - a ) f(n + 1) - Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev [1 , 4.2 . 1 .5] which diverges as if a < 0 - see (1.6 6). Therefore (20.2 ) with a < 0 is evidently unacceptable in the periodic case. In the non-periodic case the series in (20 .2) may converge for a < 0, if /(z) has a "good, decrease at infinity, for example 1/(z) l � c(1 + lz i )- �J , I' > l a l . We give some elementary properties+of the differences defined in (20.2) . Property 1. ( � h'( ��/ ))(z) = ( � � 13 /)(x). c( a) = 2
=
J
Q'
J
-
n
--+
oo,
§ 20. AN APPROACH VIA FRACTIONAL DIFFERENCES
373
If I E X (X2,.. ) , then hl�� II�J: IIIx(x�... ) = 0. Property 3. 11�: +1' lll x ( x� ) 5 c(a) ll��lll x ( x� ) · Property 1 is established by direct verification. It immediately yields Property 3 in view of (20.3) . Property 2 is proved by the methods of functional analysis: since the operator �h is bounded uniformly in h , it is sufficient to check Property 2 on some set "good" functions dense in X (X2,.. ). In the non-periodic case the Fourier transform of �h I is given by the formula Property 2.
...
...
(20.5)
provided that l(x) is in L 1 (R1 ) , for example, while in the periodic case a similar formula may be written for the Fourier coefficients, namely (20.6)
Equations (20.5) and (20.6) are established by direct verification. Starting from (20. 1 ) we introduce the function f:1:a) (X) _ h1.-+O ( �±hh al)(x) , -
l iD
Q > 0,
(20.7)
where the nature of the limit may be different depending on the question in hand: i.e. for each x, for almost all x or in the norm of X or X2,... . The function defined in (20.7) will be referred to as the Gronwald-Letnikov fractional derivative. If the limit (20.7) is taken in the sense of X (X2,... )-convergence, (20 7) may be called a strong Griinwald-Letnikov derivative in X (X2,... ). In Theorems 20.2 and 20.4 below we shall show that the Griinwald-Letnikov derivative coincides with the Marchand derivative in
.
limo r( 1 a- a) J f(x) -t l+l(xa -=f t) dt D a± I = e00
£
'
0
< a < 1. ;:::
(20.8)
The form (5.80) should be taken instead of (20.8) in the case a 1. Moreover, we shall see that both the Griinwald-Letnikov and Marchand derivatives have the same domain of definition so that convergence in (20.7) implies convergence in (20.8) and vice versa.
CHAPTER 4 . OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
374
We might suggest a difference approach using the following symmetric way: (20.7') instead of (20.7). Such a form would coincide with an operation (12.1'), inverse to the Riesz potential, i.e . with d
x ) 2f(1 - a)acos(a7r/2) J 2/(x) - f(xt l-+at) - f(x + t) t. (20.8') 0 instead of (20.8 ). So we might call the limit {20.7' ) the Griin wald-Letnikov-Riesz fractional derivative. We do not elaborate on this since it would follow along the same lines as studying derivatives (20.7) in this section. Remark 20.2. Equation (20.7) may be used to define the fractional integral by taking a < 0 in (20. 7). According to Remark 20.1 such a definition will be proper for functions which have a sufficiently rapid decrease at infinity. In § 20.4 the definition of a fractional integral via (20.7) will be considered in the case of a finite interval. Generalized differences may be introduced which are generated by an analytic 01 function a( E - Th ) instead of (E - Th ) • Thus, let a function a(e), 0 � e � 2, satisfy the following assumptions: 1) it is analytic in the neighbourhood of the point e = 1: 00
fa)( _ -
a <e> = E a �: <e - 1 > 1: , a�: = a
1:=0 the series being convergent as le - 11 � 1; 2) the convergence at the points e = 0, e = 2 is absolute: "'\"" L....J ak 00
= c{ a) def l A::O 3)
l < oo ;
a(e) equals zero at the point e = 0: 00
a(O) = E < - l ) k a k = 0. k:O
(20.9)
§ 20. AN APPROACH VIA FRACTIONAL DIFFERENCES
generalized difference
375
00
k = a(E - TJa )/ = """ (a - �h f)(z) def � ( -1) a�: /(z - kh), k=O
which is evidently coincident with (�i:/)(z) in the case a(e) = ea . The property a - (b - �h f) = ab - �h f is easily proved, were ab - �h f is a generalized difference�hgenerated by the product a(e)b(e). This is an extension of Property 1 for the differences �j./. Following Post (2] we may introduce generalized differentiation a("D)/, defining it similarly to (20.7) by the equation where
(
E -a("D)f = 1� a h TJ&) /,
(20.10) (20.11)
We might give another definition: a ["D]f = h-o lim. a -a(h)�i: f .
(20.12) Equation (20.10) has some shortcomings in comparison with (20.12) as formally the series in (20.11) may prove to be divergent for small h, if the series in (20.9) diverges for large e. So if the function a(e) is not analytic for all e, equations (20.10) and (20.11) may be made meaningful using restrictions on the function /{z), which guarantee the convergence of the series in (20.11). Nevertheless, (20.10) is more natural then (20.12), because this is precisely the result which leads to the formula (20.13) (a("D) /] 1: = a(ik)f�e , for periodic functions /(z), where J,, -are the Fourier coefficients of the function f. Note that (20.13) itself assumes the function a(e) to be defined at last on the whole imaginary line. We shall not elaborate further on generalized differentiation a("D) as well as on any other generalization of such a kind. We note only that applying (20.10) and (20.11) formally we obtain the following representation in the case of infinitely
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
376
differentiable functions /(z), namely 00
00
a(1J) f = L( - 1 )i aj (E - 1J)i J = L(- 1 )i bj1Ji j, j :O j:1
'D = dfd:r, b; = t < - 1 ) " (�) a, . V:J
J
20.2. Coincidence of the Griinwald-Letnikov derivative with the Marchand derivative. The periodic case
We shall show first that the existence of the Griinwald-Letnikov derivative (20.7) for a function /( z) is equivalent to this function being represented by the Weyl fractional integral up to a constant term - Theorem 20. 1 . We shall first establish some auxiliary lemmas for the fractional order differences �h f of functions /(z) , representable by a fractional integral. Let ka (z) = rla) z+- 1 and
00
Pa( z) = (�ika)( z ) _
1 - r(n) �(- 1 )j (aj ) (x - J )a+- 1 . .
We shall also need functions
211"
X a(z; h) = h _
1) 2)
Pa
""""
L...J
j
( z +h27r )
- f;; <j
Pa
( z +h27rj ) .
( 20 . 15)
The function Pa( z), a > 0, has the properties
Pa(z) E L 1 (R1
(
J = - oo
211"
- h Lemma 20. 1.
�
. L...J
(20. 1 4)
)
00
,
J Pa( z)dz =
1;
- 00
a i>:; (z) = 1:;;"'" ) , the principal value of the power function being chosen so
that i>:;(O) = 1 ; 3) Pa(z) = 0 as z > a in the case a = 1 , 2 , . . .
§ 20. AN APPROACH VIA FRACTIONAL DIFFERENCES
377
Pmof. We begin with the simplest property 3) . In the case of an integer a we have for z > a
=
1
A a a-1 � z . r(a) 1
But (d� Pm )(z) 0 I > for any polynomial P (x) of order - (5.75). Consequently dfza- 1 0 and then Pa (z) 0 as z > a.m 2) is obtained by direct application of the Fourier transform to Pa (z) and by use of (7.6). The most difficult part in the proof of the lemma is a demonstration of the first of the statements1 in 1). Let W = F(LI ) be the( 1ring )ofa Fourier transforms functions in L 1 (R ) . We have thus to show that :;;"' E W. Let p(z) be smooth step function, i.e. an infinitely differentiable function on R1 such that p(z) = 1 lzl � 2, p(z) = 0 lzl � 3 and 0 � I' � 1 as 2 � lzl � 3. We have =
as
=
m
=
m
of a
as
as
(20.16) The first term here is an infinitely differentiable finite function and so undoubtely belongs to W. It is sufficient to refer to the known fact that any function in the Schwartz space S is a Fourier transform of a function in the same space (see § 8.2). Further, let us show that 1 - p(z) E W. (20.17) (-iz)a We shall use the following known fact (see, for example, Bochner [1, p.271]): (20.18) then I E W. Hence, integrating by parts the Fourier integral j we easily derive the following simple sufficient condition for a function I to belong, to W: then
I E W.
(20.19)
378
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
We see that (1 - iz) -a E It is easily seen assumptions (20.19)
W for any a > 0 by (7.9). Then [1 - p(z)](I - iz) -a E W. that the difference [1 - p(x)][( -ix)-a - (1 - iz) -a] satisfies the of and is therefore in W. Thus (20.17) is proved. To show that the second term in (20.16) belongs to W, we expand (1 - eia:) a in the binomial series and notice that where
1/;(x)
=
required.
E ( -1) A: (:)
�
c(a) ll
which gives what
IS
So we have obtained the first part 1). As for the latter it is readily seen from
2) . •
Let a > 0 and h > 0. Then 2r 1) J X a (z; h)dz = 21r; 0 2) ll x a ( · ; h) IIL1 ( 0 , 2r ) � M < oo, with M not depending on h; 2r 3) lim J Xa (z ; h)dx = 0 for 6 > 0; h -O+ 6 4) The Fourier coefficients of the function X a ( x; h) are equal to
Lemma 20.2.
(
)
e - ikh a (X a ( ·; h)) k = 1 -ikh
(20.20)
with the natural interpretation ( X a ( ·; h)) o = 1 .
Proof. Properties 1)-4) are corollaries of known arguments in harmonic analysis connected with the Poisson summation formula. Namely, it is known and is easily verified that if G(x) = i =E- oo g(x + 21rj), then 00
(20.21) We have
already used this device while proving Lemma 19.1. Using (20.21), we
379
§ 20. AN APPROACH VIA FRACTIONAL DIFFERENCES
obtain
00 J Xa (x; )dx 27r J p01 (x)dx, 00 J lx (x; h) ldx ::; 21r J I P (z) ldz, 211'
h
0
=
- oo
211'
a
6
6/h
(20.22)
a
[X a ( · ; h)]�: = Pa (k),
where p01 (k) is the inverse Fourier transform of the function p01(z). By Lemma 20.1 the relation in (20.22) yield the properties 1)-4). We add to Lemma 20.2 the equation •
( + )(x) + 1, X a (x; h) = � l:'��hOt
(20.23)
which clarifies why we need the function x01 (x; h); here '��+ (z) is the kernel ( 19.8) of the Weyl fractional integral ( 19.7) . To prove this equation it is sufficient to show the coincidence of the corresponding Fourier coefficients: (Xa ( · ; h)) = h-01 (�1:'1i+)t , k #; 0. The latter follows from (20.20), (20.6) and ( 19.8). We are now ready to prove our main statements. We recall that in Theorem 20 . 1 and 20.2 the space X2 meant any of the spaces Lp (O, 21r), 1 p or �:
::;
...
C(O, 2r).
< oo,
Theorem 20.1. Let f(x) X2... . A{strong) Griinwald-Letnikov derivative exists in X2... if and only if there exists a function
E
E
f(x) = Ii01>
2r
fo = 2� J f(x)dx,
(20.7)
(20.24)
0
and then
380
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
in X2.,. Then 211' 1 ) lim h-a (�h f)(x)dx (/: )�& = 211" j e - i k:J: h-++0 (X2,.)
0
211' -01 limo h !(�h01f)(x)e -ilu:dx. 211" h-+
= _!_
0
Hence (/�) )�& = (ik)01/�& in view of (20.6). Since f�> (x) E X2.,, we that the representation (20.24) is true by Theorem 19.3. Conversely, let (20.24) be satisfied. Then see
211'
(�h f)(x) = 2� j
Applying (20.23), we have
( fl.�:J(z) = 1 j211'
(20.24')
0
This equation allows us to justify the limiting process I �t' -
X 2 ..
-+
0 by
Let f E X2.,. Then the Grii.nwald-Letnikov fractional derivative (20.7) exists simultaneously with the Marchaud derivative (19.34) and they coincide with each other:
Theorem 20.2.
I
.
Im
h-++0 (X2 .. )
( ��" /)(x) h 01
_
a
tm f f(x) -t +f(xa
1.
- f( 1 - Q) (£-+0)
00
X2.- £
1
�
t) dt .
(20.25)
If X2., = Lp (O, 21r), 1 < p < oo, the Grii.nwald-Letnikov and Marchaud derivatives exist simultaneously even under the different choice of signs + or -.
Proof. Theorem 20.2 follows immediately from Theorems 20.1 and 19.2, the statement on the simultaneous existence of derivatives with different signs being derived by means of (19.24) and (19.25). •
§ 20. AN APPROACH VIA FRACTIONAL DIFFERENCES
381
Theorem 20.2 is extended to values of a � 1 under the proper interpretation of the Marchaud derivative - Remark 19.2. It was shown in Theorem 19.2 that the condition IID+,£1 11L,.(o,2,..) � c of uniform boundedness of truncated Marchaud derivatives is necessary and sufficient for existence in L, of the Marchaud derivative or, which is the same, for a function /(z) to be represented by a fractional integral of order a of a function in L, . The following theorem gives a similar statement for the Griinwald-Letnikov derivative. Theorem 20.3. Let / (z) E L, (O, 21r), 1 < p < Then the Griinwald-Letnikov ) ) 'derivative /� (z) or /� (z) exists if and only if
oo .
(20.26) where c does not depend on h.
The only thing which needs to be demonstrated is to show that (20.26) provides the existence of the limit h-+O lim h-a ��f in L, . It is known that bounded sets in L, are weakly compact, i.e. any bounded set in this space has a weakly convergent sequence - Dunford and Schwartz [1, p.314]. So there exists a sequence hm 0 and a function g( z) E L, such that Proof. -+
211'
211'
0
0
J�oo j h;_a (��.. f)(z) tfJ(z)dx = j g(x) tfJ(x)dx
(20.27)
for all functions t/J(z) E £,,(0, 21r). Let us choose 1/J(z) = ! e- ib. Then {20.27) turns into the equation mlim-oo h�"' (��"' f) k = Yk · Hence by (20.6) we see that (ik)0 fk = gk , g(z) E L, . Then Theorem 19. 3 asserts that / (z) may be represented as in (20.24), which in view of theorem 20.1 is equivalent to existence in L, of the Griinwald-Letnikov derivative. Remark 20.3. In the case of functions f(x), representable in the form (20. 2 4), the inequality {20.26) may be written more exactly, •
211'
c=
sup j lxa (z; h)ldz h >O 0
which is derived from {20.24').
(20.26')
382
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
20.3. Coincidence of the Griinwald-Letnikov derivative with the Marchand derivative. The non-periodic case
In the case of the whole axis R1 fractional integration does not keep the space Lp invariant. So dealing with the Griinwald-Letnikov fractional derivative f± ) or the Marchand derivative D<J: convergent in the space Lp (R1 ) , we do not require that the functions themselves/ be in Lp(R1 ) . Otherwise it would be an evident restriction of the initial setting of the problem, compare Theorem 20.4 with the similar Theorem 20.2. Theorem 20.4. Let f(x) E Lr (R1 ) , 1 � r < and let D+,e f be the truncated Marchaud derivative (5. 80'), D� ,e f being similarly written from (5.80). Then the limits oo,
(D±f)(x) = elim-o (D± 'e f)(x) (Lp (R1 ))
lim (LJI(R1 )) h-+O
(20.28)
exist simultaneously and coincide (under the same choice of signs) for any E [1, oo) and any a > 0, the values of p and r being independent.
p
Proof. For the sake of brevity we consider the case 0 < a < 1, 1 < p < 1/a only. We refer the reader to the paper by Samko [34] for the proof applying to all values of a and p. Let the second of the limits (20.28) exist. Then f(x) = P+ rp, rp = D+f E Lp by Theorem 6.2 . Applying the fractional order difference to the integral f = If. rp we have (�U)(z) = _£ 10(t) � (-1); (;) ka (z - t - hj)dt , (20.29) where ka (x) = r(�)r x�- l , the termwise integration being easily justified. After the change x - t = h in (20.29) we obtain 00
00
(��::(z) = l (��f'j_\O)(z) = J Pa ( T)\O(Z - Th)dT, (20.30) ha - oo where Pa ( r) is a function (20.14). In view of Lemma 20.1 we see that Theorem 1.3 may be applied, so the right-hand side in (20.30) converges to rp(x) in Lp(R1 ) as h ---+ +0. So from (20.30) 00
§ 20. AN APPROACH VIA FRACTIONAL DIFFERENCES
383
Conversely, let the Griinwald-Letnikov derivative l�) (z) exist. Let us prove the identity l'j. ( ��� ) J Pa (t)f(x - ht)dt (20.31) under the theorem's assumptions on l(x). Equation (20.31) is immediately reduced {20.30) in the case of "good" functions, since If. and dh commute when applied to "good" functions. The problem is to justify (20.31) in the situation when If. is applicable to dh I, but is not applicable termwise to the series dh I. To obtain (20.31) we use a method which has already been demonstrated in the proof of Theorem 6.2. Let Ae be the operator in (6.22). We have (on "good" functions for the present), 00
=
- oo
to
Ae (d'h l/h01) = h- 01[( l.t d'h l)(z) - (If. d'h l)(z - e)] = h- 01[(d'h If. l)(x) - (d'h If.l)(z - e)].
Applying {20.30), we obtain Ae (d'h f/h01) =
00
j pOI (t)l(z - th)dt
- oo
00
- J P OI (t) l(z - e - th)dt.
(20.32)
- oo
Since the operators both on the left- and right-hand sides are bounded in Lr , (20.32) is valid not only for "good" functions, but for the whole space Lr . Equation (20.32) means that (20.33)
where d� is a difference of order one. Functions having the same finite difference may 1differ by a constant at the utmost. Since the functions considered are in Lr(R ), this constant is zero, so (20.33) leads to (20.31). Equation (20.31) being obtained, we let h 0. Then by the properties of the kernel p01 (t) and by Theorem 1.3 we arrive at l(z) = If. (h-+O lim �t' 1) = If.cp, = I�) . So we have shown that the existence of the Griinwald-Letnikov derivative for a function l(z) implies that l(z) may be represented by the fractional integral -+
cp
384
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
of this derivative. Then by Theorem 6.1 the function /(z) has a Marchand fractional derivative, coinciding with tp = /�) . The following is a non-periodic analogue of Theorem 20.3. •
Theorem 20.5. 1 < p < 1/a, i/ and
Let /(z) only if
E
Lr(R1 ),
1 � r <
oo .
Then /(z)
E Jor(Lp) ,
(20.34) Proof. The necessity of the inequality in (20. 34) follows from (20.30). To show that it is sufficient we shall make use of1 (20.3 1), which is valid under our assumption on /(z). Since the space Lp (R ) is weakly compact, the uniform boundedness of the functions implies the existence of a sequence hm 1 0 and a 1 function tp(z) E Lp (R ) such that h;;,or tihm f weakly converges in Lp (R ) to tp(z). Since the right-hand side of (20.3 1) strongly converges in Lr to /(z), it so much the more weakly converges to Lr. Then there exists a weak limit (w-lim) in Lr on the left-hand side: w-lim/ (20.35) m-oo +or(tihm f/h� ) = / (z). ( Lr ) Furthermore, since h;;,or m f weakly converges in L and the operator I+. is bounded from Lp into £9ti, h = p/(1 - ap), we conclude pthat the limit --+-
q
(20.36) exists too. Since weak limits in £9 and in Lr of the same sequence are to coincide with each other almost everywhere, from (20.35) and (20.36) we that I+.tp = /(z) almost everywhere. Remark 20.31 • Similarly to (20. 2 6' ) we note that (20. 34) can be made more exact: ll tih/llp � chor ii D+ JIIP , c = j I Pa (x)jdx, h > 0, (20.34') - oo in the case of the functions f(x) E Ia(Lp ), 1 < p < 1/a. This follows from (20.30). The inequality l (ti h f)(x) l � cha sup I (D +J )(x) j, h > 0, (20.34") is also valid for such functions /(z). see
•
00
X
385
§ 20. AN APPROACH VIA FRACTIONAL DIFFERENCES
In the non-periodic case we have restricted ourselves for the sake of brevity to functions given on the whole line. It is not difficult to see that Theorem 20.4 remains valid on the half-line R� for the right-hand sided fractional differentiation /�) and D�/. For this purpose it is sufficient to define /(z 0 for negative z. The following theorem presents a modified version of Theorem) 20.5 for the case of a half-axis. Theorem 20.51 • Let /(z) E Lr(R�), 1 � r < Then /(z) has the Marchaud lim D� 'c f in Lp(R�), 1 < p < 1 /a , if and only if fractional derivative D� f = c-o L.,
Remark 20.4.
=
oo.
( )
na�h /llp � ch" ' h > 0, with c not depending on h.
Theorem 20.5' is formulated for p E ( , /o:) , but it valid for which requires other means - Samko [34]. 1 1
Remark 20.5. oo ) ,
p E (1, 20.4.
Griinwald-Letnikov fractional differentiation on a finite interval
The definition itself of the fractional order difference Ah'/ by (20.2) assumes that the function /(z) is given at least on the half-axis. When the function /(z) is given on a finite interval (a, b] only, the natural way to define the difference ah' / is connected with continuation of the function /(x) as a vanishing function beyond the interval (a, b). So, for a function f(x), given on [a, b), we introduce as a definition (20.37) (ah'/)(z) �(ah'/* )(x) = f: ( -1 ); (�) !* (x - j h ) , :O j J
/* (z)
x E [a, b), x ¢ [a, b).
= { 0,f(x),
It is clear that (20.37) may be rewritten in terms of the function /(z) itself, avoiding its continuation as a vanishing function: ( A h'/)(z)
=
[T]
( A�h/)(z) =
L
j =O
( - 1 ); (�) f(x - jh),
[ ¥]
E {- 1/
j :O
J
(�) f(x J
+ j h) ,
x > a,
(20.38)
z < b, .
(20.39)
where we have assumed that h > 0. After this fractional derivatives 1:� and 1:� of the Griinwald-Letnikov type are introduced in the same way as in the case of
386
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
the whole line: [z;;" ] � ( - 1)i �O
(�) f(x - jh),
(20.40)
( -1); (�) f(x + jh). lim h1a � 1:� (x) = h-+O � J O = J
(20.41)
lim h1a 1:�(x) = h-+0
J=
J
[�]
In (20.38) and (20.39) one may choose a variable step h, depending on z, e.g . h = (x - a)/n in (20.38) and h = (b - x)fn in (20.39). Then (20.40) turns into � a� � J:� (z) = ( -1 a) a nlim -oo n �O ( - l)i ( ) f (x - j n ) J= J
X
(20.42)
and similarly for J:l. We note that it was in just this way that Grunwald and Letnikov introduced their fractional differentiation. Starting directly from (20.40) and (20.41) one may develop an independent theory of fractional differentiation. There is no necessity in such a development, however, because Griinwald-Letnikov derivatives coincide with other forms used in the case of an interval as well, e.g. with the Marchaud derivative. The following theorem holds. Theorem 20.6. Let f(x) E Lp (a, b), 1 � p < oo. Then the limit (20.40) exists in the sense of Lp(a , b)-convergence if and only if there exists tll.e Marchaud fractional
derivative (13.9) in the same sense. Both limits, if they exist, coincide with each other:
a) ( X ) f4+
X
a f(x) f(x) - f(t) . - a) a + f(l - a) j (x - t) l + a dt, f(1 - c:r)(x a
(20.43)
O < a < l.
This theorem is easily derived from (20.40), (20.37), Theorem 20.4 and (13.2) and ( 1 3 .4) . Based on the coincidence shown in (20.43) of two different definitions of fractional differentiation, one may obtain various properties of derivatives (20AO)
§ 20. AN APPROACH VIA FRACTIONAL DIFFERENCES
387
or (20.41). We note for example simple formulae following from (20.43) such
as
(20.44)
although (20.44) may be also established directly by means of (20.4); and
=
(cf.
(2.44)) and so on.
f(l + {3) (x - a)P- a f(l + f3 - a)
(20.45)
In particular, (20.45) yields the equation
j (�) ( 1 - j_ ) p = f(1 + {3) lim N° t (-1) N-oo N f(1 + {3 - a) . =O J
J
all {J 2: 0, 0 < a < 1, although its validity may be shown for all a > 0. We concentrate now on the Griinwald-Letnikov definition of fractional integration - see Remarks 20.1 and 20.2. Starting from (20.40) we introduce [ T] j J:+tp lim h0 � ( - 1 ) ( �) rp(x - jh)
for
=
h- + O
=O J�
J
(20.46)
Similarly Jf:_ rp is defined. Let us demonstrate that (20.46) is just the same the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral. Theorem 20.7. Let a > 0 and let rp(x) E L 1 (a, b). Then the limit (20.46) exists for almost all x and (20.47) J:+ 'P = � j tp (x - t)t a-i dt. f( ) as
x
-a
0
Since the function t0- 1 rp(x - t) is integrable for almost every the right-hand side of (20.47) may be written a limit of the integral sum Proof.
as
x,
388
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
rf;;y E �(z - e; >e; - 1 �Zj , Zj � e; � Zj+ 1 ·
j � [(z - a)/h] and e; = Zj . Then
We may choose in particular Zj = jh,
[T] lr( ) J ta- 1 �(x - t)dt = r(la) h-+o lim h01 E. 0 ja- 1 �(z - jh). J= 0 �-a
a
This coincides with the limit in (20.46), since lja- 1 - �H!�� I � j'Jc_o by (1.66) ?] 2 and h-+O lim ha [j:O E ja - l�(z - jh)l = 0 for almost all x. One may prove also a statement similar to Theorem 20.7 for functions given on the axis or half-axis provided that the functions decrease sufficiently rapidly· at infinity. § 2 1 . Operators with Power-Logarithmic Kernels
One of the direct generalizations of the fractional integrals I:+ � and I6_ � on a finite interval [a b] of the real axis has the form ,
In{3 J_ z- t a ,{j � )( z ) - f 1 ( Ia+ �(t ) dt, (a) J (x t) l - Ot �
_
6-
_
a
(Ia ,{j � )( z ) - 1
r (a)
�
In
{3 J_
J (t - x) l -01 �(t)dt, t-�
(21.1)
a
{3 � 0, i > b - a , containing both logarithmic and power singularities. We shall call these constructions pe t with power-logarithmic kernels. Such integrals arise when investigating integral equations of the first kind with power-logarithmic kernels (see §§ 32 and 33). The inversion of the operators in (21.1) will be obtained in § 32.3. In this section we shall consider the mapping properties of operators with power logarithmic kernels in Holder spaces and in the spaces of summable functions. The results stated and proved here for0 the integrals I:/� generalize similar ones for, the fractional integrals I:+ � = I:f- � from § 3. We note also that the space H>t lt: (see Definition 1.7) now plays an essential role for the operators (21.1), unlike the case of fractional integration operators for which this space arises only in separate cases (see Theorems 3.1 and 3.6). o
a > 0,
ra ors
·
389
§ 21. OPERATORS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
2 1 . 1 . Mapping properties in the space
H>.
The following theorem shows how operators with power-logarithmic kernels improve the Holder exponent for a function
where
(21.2)
J t0 1 ln13 f dt, and 1/J(x) E H>.+ a,/3 if � + a =/= 1 and 1/J(x) E n>..+ a, /3+ l if � + a = 1, estimate lt/J (x)l � A(x - a)>. + a ln,B x -1 -a , A > O(x � a) �{j, a (x) =
z-a
(21.3)
-
0
and the
(21.4) holds. The function �,B , a (x) is infinitely differentiable beyond the point x = a and has the power-logarithmic behavior: -
(-1 ) k ( -m) k lnm k 1 (21.5) �m ' a (x) = (x - a)0 � k+ l a x L :O k if {3 = m is an integer. If {3 is not an integer, then for any N = 1, 2, . . . we have
a
-
--
where x � a. Proof.
By Theorem 3.1 it is sufficient to consider the case {3 > 0. If we set ,P(z) =
f(la) f(z - t) a- t JnP ., � t (cp(t) - cp(a)]dt z
a
390
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
we obtain (21.2). The relations (21.5) and (21.6) are derived from (21.3) by successive integration by parts. For 1/;( x) we have �
X
1-dt 11/J (x)l f - 1 (o:)llcp iiH� j c x - tt - 1 (t - a)A ln,B X-t a
and after the change of variable t = a + r(x - a) we find �
1 + a Ta- 1 (1 - r)A j a)A 11/J(x)l c(x 0
(In -1-a + In 2),8 T dr. X-
Applying the known estimate (a + bY � 2max(v , 1 ) (av + bv ),
a
2::
0, b 2:: 0, V > 0
(21.7)
- for example, see Bari [1, p.31] - we obtain the inequality which yields (21.4). Further we consider 1/J(x) and suppose for simplicity that a = 0, b = 1, and > 1. We denote
'Y
g(x) = cp(x) - cp(O), lg(x)l � II 'P IIH � x\
(21.8)
and observe that (21.9) have
�
Let 0 < h < 1/2; x, x + h E [0, 1]. We investigate first the case A + o: 1. We
§ 21. OPERATORS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
391
r (a)[1/J(x + h) - 1/J(x)] 0 x+h 1 - [g(x - t) - g(x)] dt ,8 2 1 =g(x) J t 01- ln t dt + j (t + h)01. - 1 ln,8 t + h -h X
According to {21.8) I I1 I � ll
t
1.
__
1. T
As for the case x > h, the change of variable t = XT and the use of {21.7) gives 1 + h/x ln ( + ln .!.x ) ,8 dT + I I1 I -< cx A a J T 1 -a 1 1. T
Since T01- 1 ln,8 � � ln,8 1 , we obtain for x > h. Further, when we replace t by h(T - 1) in I2 and take {21.7) and {21.8) into
392
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
account we find
Finally, we estimate 13. We have z: l ln.B .B l J t +h - ln t dt < I c I al (t h p -a t l -a -
o
+
...:r_
l.
z: /h J = ch r). l ra-l ln,B :T I dr.
).+ a
If x �
h, then by {21.7) we obtain
If x >
h , then
0
For lat we find similarly to previous arguments that llat l � ch).+ a ln.B {l/h). To estimate la2 we use the relation {21.10)
§ 21. OPERATORS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
393
which follows from the mean value theorem. Then by (21.7) we have
Therefore, if A + a < 1, then owing to the convergence of the integrals J1 ra+>.- 2 dr and J1 ln{J �ra+>.- 2dr , we have 1132 1 � ch><+ a lnfJ k · If A + a = 1, then 1132 1 :5 h�+a (c mP k In � + c, nP+ l � + C2) � ch><+ a ln/J+ 1 *· Collecting the estimates for It, 12 and 13 we obtain the proof of the theorem in the case A + a � 1. Let now A + a > 1. We have to prove that 1/J'(x) = (d/dx)1�f g E n><+a - 1 ,/J . We transform fx 1�/ g to 00
00
t
f(a) d� (1�/ g)(x) = xa- 1 ln{J lg(x) + j .!!_dt (ta - 1 ln{J 1)t [g (x - t) - g(x)]dt z:
X
0
(21.11) If g is a continuously differentiable function, then (21.11) is confirmed by direct differentiation and later integration by parts. If g is a Holderian function, the coincidence of the left- and the right-hand sides of (21.11) is proved in the same way as the coincidence of the Liouville fractional derivative and the Marchand derivative on an interval (see the Corollary to Theorem 13.1 and Corollary of Lemma 13.2).
394
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Let us show that G1 (x), G2 (x) E n>.+a- l,P . We have G1 (x + h) - G1 (x) =(x + h)0 - 1 lnp _:]_ x + h [g(x + h) - g(x)] + [ex + t) 0- 1 ln{j x +1 -h - X0- 1 ln{j rx ] g (x) -
Taking (21.9) into account we obtain for G u that IGu l :5 ch>.+ a- l lnP i · (21.8) we find for G1 2 that
By
From here we have if x :5 h. Let x > h. Then, according to (21.10), we obtain that We introduce the notation (21.12)
Then 0
G2 (x + h) - G2 (x) = J K(t + h)[g(x - t) - g (x + t)]dt -h
�
�
+[g(x + h) - g(x)] j I<(t + h)dt + j [K (t + h) - K (t)] [g(x - t) - g(x)]dt 0
0
§ 21. OPERATORS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
395
We estimate G21 first. By (21.9), (21.12) and (21.7) we have that 0 I G2 1 I � c J (t h)�+a- 2 ln/J t � h dt -h +
Further we find that z: � IG22 I � ch J (t h)a- 2 ln/J t � h dt 0 +
+
in accordance with the convergence of the integral J000(r 1)a- 2 ln/J ;=h-dr for {3 � 0. Lastly, taking (21.12) and (21.9) into account we have
z:/h Inf:J- k rh lnfJ - k �I 1 T� dT. h�+a- 1 :O J r2-a ( r 1)(r+1)h 2 -a k From here if x � h, we find 1 I In{J- k rh I r 1 IInfJ - k � 1 ( (r+1)hr �I dr) 1 � +a < d h + 3 IG2 I 2 r r2 k:O J0 -a-� J0 ( 1) -a -
_
� CJc L .
�C L Jc
:L
o
:L
_
+
+
- h>..+a - 1 (c1 lnP .!:.h + c2 lnmax{O fj .!:.h )
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
396
, )
<
If
( z/li.)
x > h, then in view of (21.10) and (21.7) we obtain [ k P- k ..,.......L_ ] 1 1 "" ck J J Inpr2-aTh - nr (T2+ 1 J h r>.. dr IG2 3 I < h >.. + a - 1 L...J ( + 1) -a k=O 0 1 +
_
which completes the proof. Corollary 1.
-
..:r_
1
•
The operator
-
a
a fJ
�
0,
0 $ .\ $ 1, into H>..+a,fj if .\ + a # 1, and into H >..+a_,P+ 1 if .\ + a = l . Corollary 2. The operator 1::f is bounded from C = H 0 into Ha, p . Remark 21.1. The operator 1::f is bounded even from Loo into H a , p , which is easily seen from the analysis of the proof of Theorem 21.1. is bounded from H>.. ,
21.2. Mapping properties in the space H; (p)
As in § 3 we begin our investigation with the case of the simplest weights p(x) = (x - a)�' and p(x) = (b - xY. Theorem 21.2. Let 0 < .\ < 1, .\ + a < 1. Then the operator 1:/, {3 � 0, is bounded from H� (p) into H;+a ,p (p) ifp(x) = (x-a)�' , I' < .\ + 1 or p(x) = (b-x) " , 11 > .\ + a.
Proof. Firstly, let p(x) = (x - a) �' . By Theorem 3.3 it is sufficient to consider the
§ 2 1 . OPERATORS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
case f3 > where
0.
Let a = 0, b = 1 for simplicity. Let H >.. , = 0. We are to prove that
g(t) E g(O)
397
I_ g(t)dt E H0>.. + OI ,P G(x) = J0 ( !t ) �-' lnP _ x - t (x - t) l - 01 :J:
I GI H�+ar. � � cl lg iiH� . We represent G(x) z: z: In,.., ..:L.. t z: G(x) = J ( - t)� g(t)dt + j t�-'l(x�-'--tt�-') -l OI lnP -1--t g(t)dt 0 0 = <)(x) + w(x). (21 . 13) By Theorem 21.1 we obtain that <)(x) E H; + OI ,Jj . For w(x) we have, similarly to
and
as
a
- OI
X
l
X
X
(3.7) ,
z:+h w(x + h) - w(x) - J InJj + Ih - t tl-'(( ++ h)�-'h --t)t�-'1 - OI g(t)dt X
X
X
z: - t ] g( t ) dt + J x�-' t-�-' t�-' [ (x I+nf3h -+ht-) lt- 01 - (xIn-f3 t)..:L.. 1 - 01 z:
_:r_ :J:
0
J1
We estimate first . Let (2.17} we find that
Jl
� 1. Since
lg(t) l � I Y I IH� t>.. then in view of (3.9} and
- t)01 In 1 dt I J1 I � IJJ. I I YI I H� J (x(t +- hxp->.. x+h-t z:+h :J:
(21 . 14}
p
398
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
If I' > 1 , then, according to (3.8), we have that
h + IJtl � IP I II9 I HA(z + h) P-l j (z �:-� t)01 lnP z + � -t dt �
�
� +h l dt h01 np h -< c (z + h) l- P J tP-" h01 lnp h [(z + h) "- p+ l - z"- P+ 1] =c (z + h)l-P -< ch1+01 lnP 2h (z + h) "-1 <- ch"+01 lnP !..h We estimate J2 . If x � h, then we obtain I J2 I < chP !� ( + th" -pt) 1 -a lnp X + � - t dt 1.
--
�
1.
-
0
Z
-
-< chP+OI-l lnp 2h j0� t " - P dt
if I' � 0, and
if I' < 0. If x >
h, then by applying the inequalities (3.9) and (21 .7) we find that
�
-< ch ! t 1 -.\ln(z - tp-a dt
§ 21. OPERATORS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
0
p
if 5
1.
Let p >
1.
Then by
399
,6 ..::L �-t
(3.8), we have � +h
_J__
ln,6 < ph(x + h) " - 1 j I J2 I .\ t�'(x + h - t) 1 -a dt �1 - p (x + h)hl-.\-a 1 (1 - T) .\-1' Ta- 1 (1n z + h + n ;1 ) ,6 dT 0 h 1n,6 5 ch.\+a In,6 -;;1 · 5c (z + h) 1 -.\-a x + h For Ja the change t = sx gives the estimate 1 1 - ln,6 ln,6 1 1 a + .\ - ds. 1 < I Jal _ ll 9 l n " z 1 1 - sp-a -.\ s -a (1 h/x) + �' ( I I o �+h -t
"'(
1
"'(
11
s
8
Collecting the estimates for
Hence taking we see that
+ h/� 1 - IJ l
..::L
J1 , J2 and J3, we obtain cll9ll n" x.\+a
and the inequality IG(x) l 5 ln,6 ; into account So we have proved the theorem for the case E < � + 1. When = (b - z)", v > � + a, the proof of the
(21.13)
G(z) H.\+a,,6 . p(z) = (z - a)�', p
p(x)
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
400
theorem is carried out in the same way as the proof of Theorem 3.3 using the inequalities (3.8), (3.9) , (21.7) and (21.10). • The following statement analogous to Theorem 3.3' follows from Theorem 21.2.
Theorem 21.21• Let 0 < ..\ < 1, ..\ + a < 1 . Then the operator 1:+ is bounded from H�(p) into H�+ a ,.B(p), p(z) = (z - a) JA (b - z)", JJ < ..\ + 1, 11 > ..\ + a.
The of Theorem 21 .2' is carried out in the same way as the proof of Theorem 3.3' using the following inequality for functions in H� ·11(p): I I Y IIn A .�(P) � max(I IY II HA·�(P.) ' II Y I I HA·�(P•) ) where Pa ( z ) = (z - a) JA , Pb ( z ) = (b - z)". To extend Theorems 21.2 and 21 .2' to the case of the general weight ( 1 .7) a statement of the type of Lemma 3. 1 for integrals with the kernel
proof
(z + t) a- l lniA z 1+t, -
is required. It has the following form. a < 1 < 1.
Let a function cp(z), Then
Lemma 21.1.
/( z ) =
I
0<
z > 0,
t > 0,
x � I, ha ve the estimate l cp (x) l � kx --r,
In iA ...::J_
J0 (x + txp+t-a cp(t )dt E no+.B,JA ((O ' I] ·' x-r+.B )
for any JJ � 0, 1 > 21 and /3 � 0 such that a + f3 � where c does not depend on cp(x).
1,
and 11 /llna+�.,.(x..,+�) � ck
The of this lemma is carried out in the same way as the proof of Lemma 3.1 using the inequalities (21 .7) and (21.10).
proof
Let p(z) be the weight conditions be satisfied:
Theorem 21.3.
(3. 12), ..\ + a < 1
1) JJ 1 < ..\ + 1; 2) ..\ + a < 1-' lc < ..\ + 1 , k = 2, 3, . . . , n - 1 ; 3) ..\ + a < JJ n < ..\ + 1 if X n < b and ..\ + a < J.Ln
I:f is bounded from H�(p) into H� + a .B (p).
and let the following
if Xn = b . Then the operator
.
The of Theorem 21.3 is carried out in the same way as the proof of Theorem 3.4 using Theorems 21 .2 and 21 .2' and Lemma 2 1 .1 .
proof
k = 2, 3, . . . , n , in Theorem 21.3 may not be weakened: if .\ + a � JJ/c , then Theorem 21.3 is not true. Indeed, if we put p(x ) =
Remark 21.2. The condition .\ + a < Jl k ,
§ 21. OPERATORS WITH POWER-- L OGARITHMIC KERNELS
401
(b - x ) � , J' :5 .\ + a and
The following two theorems contain more precise statements.
If 0 < a < 1, f3 2:: 0 and 1 :5 p < 1/a, then the operator 1::/ is bounded from Lp into L. , 1 � s < q = p(l - ap) - 1 . This theorem follows from Theorem 3.5 since
Theorem 21.4.
(21.15) for any small c >
0 and 0 < a < 1.
Let p > 1 and 1/p < a :5 1 + 1/p. Then the operator 1::/ is bounded from Lp into H"'- 1/P .P if a < 1 + 1/p and into H"'- 1fp ,fJ + 11P if a = t + 1, and 1(21.16) (1::/v;)(x) = < x - a) "' - 1 /P lnfJ x - a as x -+ a.
Theorem 21.5.
o
Proof. We set a Holder inequality
(
)
= 0, b = 1 for simplicity. The estimate (21.16) follows from the (1.28) in view of (21.7): 1 /p z 1/p' z 1 p 1 - dt j(x - t)
�
= f( )
(
0
.,a- l/p
) (
)
(I1 T(a- l)p' ( ; ;r dT) 1/p' (I l'l'(t)l'dt) 1/p 0
z
In
+ In
(21.17)
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
402
Let
+
z, z h E [0, 1] and 0 < h 5 1/2. We have
f(o:)[(Jgf
z
+ J [
.
o
Applying the Holder inequality and taking
(
1
) 1/p' p ' ,B � a - 1 )p' (In k + In X) dr
=
I 'Pi l L. ha- 1/p
5
cl l
I
(21.7) into account we find
Hence
l
5
Cll
) 1 fp ' r· d r
if z
::;
§ 21. OPERATORS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
403
h. Let z > h. Then we apply the inequalities (21 .7) and (21.10) and have
Then
in the case a - 1
If a
<
1/p owing to the convergence of the integral J r< a - 2 )P' ln.8P 00
I
1
- 1 = 1/p, then
Collecting the estimates for 4) 1 and 4) 2 we complete the proof.
•
We note that the statement on the boundedness of I';f from Loo into observed in Remark 21.1 corresponds to the case p = oo in Theorem 21.5.
�dr.
na ,,8
Remark 21.3. In the case of the pure logarithmic kernel (a = 1) and 0
< {J < 1/p' the statement of Theorem 21.5 can be improved: if 0 < {J < 1/p', then the operator I�:( is bounded from Lp into HP .
Let us estimate 4) 2 in (21 .18). Using the inequality 0 < {J < 1 , and the Holder inequality we have
l a.B - 6.8 1
::;
I a - bl.8 ,
[ + (/. t•�� ) ' "]
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
404
:5 IIIDIIL, h W c c, :5 Ill" IlL . h
••
1/p' [c + c, ( � a r - l/p' ] :5 ciiii'IIL. hp . "
Lp (p) As in § 21.2 we consider first the weight p(x) (x - a)#'. We have to distinguish 2 1 .4. Mapping properties in the space the cases 1
<
=
p < 1/o: and p > 1/o:.
f p > 1, p - 1 and 0 o: 1/p, then the operator I:f 1is bounded from Lp (p),I p(x) (x - a)#', into L, (r) where 1 $ p(1 - o:p) - , r(x) (x - a)#'•IP. J.l <
Theorem 21.6.
<
<
s < q =
=
=
This theorem follows from Theorem 3.7 in view of (21. 15) .
Let 1 p is bounded from L (p), p(x) and into H 1•fJ+ 1 1Pp' (p) if o:
Theorem 21.7.
<
=
(1:/
and 1/p (x - a)#', 1/p + 1 and
< oo =
o: $ 1/p + 1 . Then the operator 1:/ J.l < p - 1, into n a- 1 fP , fJ (p 1 1P ) if o: < 1/p <
((x - a) a- (1+#')/P lnfJ x - a ) x ---+ a. 1-
-
b
a
,
(21 .19)
Proof. We set = 0 and = 1 for simplicity. Let = x - " g(x), v = pfp, The estimate (21 .19) is obtained by the same arguments as in (21 .17) . We shall prove that
g E Lp .
G(x) J (=-)t " (x - t)01- 1 ln{J 1 t g(t)dt E na- 1/p,{j ' X
=
--
X-
0
if o: -
(21.20)
1/p < 1 and (21 .21)
if 0: -
1/p = 1.
§ 21. OPERATORS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
405
We represent G(z) as G(z) = (z) + ')(z),
(21 .22)
where (z) and ')(z) are the same as in (21 .13) but with J.l being replaced by 11 = JJ /p; note that 11 < 1 due to assumptions of the theorem. Let 0 < h < 1/2. By Theorem 21.5 we have if
Q - 1/p < 1, if Q - 1/p = 1. We represent the function ')(z) in the form (21.14): ') (z + h) - ')(z) = J1 + J2 + Ja where J J2 and J3 are the same as in (21 .14) but with J.l being replaced by II = pjp. Let J.l > 0 and hence 11 > 0. Using the Holder inequality, (21 .7) and Holder property of x " we obtain
1,
= �
'Y) fJp' ) 1/p'
1 T(v+a- 1)p' ( ( / ' h II9 I L, " ' • r) ' 0
(l -
ci i9 I L. ha- 1/P ln11 �·
1 In h + In ;
••
dr
Applying again the Holder inequality to J2 we have
Hence if x �
h , then
ch•+<> - I mP � II9 I L, (/ r••' dt) � cha- 1 /P ln11 * 119 1 £ z
IJ• l �
•
.
1/p'
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
406
If z >
h , then using (3.9) and (21.7) we find
Finally we estimate = sz we obtain
t
If z �
J3. Applying the Holder inequality and changing ·the variable
h, then IJal � cha- 1 /P I u iiL,. · If z > h, then by (21 .10) J1 , J2 and Ja we have
Collecting the estimates for
Hence, according to (21 .22) and (21.23) we obtain (21.20) and (21.21) , which proves the theorem in the case I' > 0. If I' = 0, then the theorem coincides with Theorem 21.5. Let now I' < 0 ( v < 0). Then $;
z+h
IJ1 I 2 j (x + h - t) a- 1 InP z + r - t lu(t) ldt For
z
J2 we have the estimate I J2 1 2l gful cxa- 1/p ln,6 � l u i L ,. cha- 1 /p ln,6 * I U I L,. $;
$;
i
$;
§ 21. OPERATORS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
if
407
z � h . If z > h, then we obtain the same estimate by the arguments similar to those in the case 11 > 0. We apply the Holder inequality to J3 and obtain
If
z � h, then we have
IJal :5 4llu i L, h0- l /p (! T(o - l)p' (tn � + In �r· dT) � cl l g l i Lp ha- 1 /p lnP * · If z > h , then taking (21. 10} into account we find
1/p'
if a - p1 < 1 ' if a - p1 = 1 . Whence (21 .20} and (21.21} with < 0 follow, which completes the proof. Corollary. Under assumptions of Theorem 21.7 the operator 1:1 is bounded from Lp (p), p(z) = (z - a)ll, into h� - 1 /p ,p (p1 1P) if a < 1/p + 1 and into b�- 1/p,P +1 /p' (p1/P) if a = 1/p + 1 . This corollary is proved in a similar way to that of Theorem 3.8. For the weight p(z} = lz - di ll , a < d < b, the result is the following. Theorem 21.8. If 1 < p < 1/a, < p - 1, a < d � b, then the operator r:f is bounded from Lp (p), p(z) = l z - d i ll , a < d � b, into L,(r) where 1 � < = p( l - ap) - 1 , r(z) = l z - d l v and 11 given by (3.21} with = s. According to (21 . 15} this theorem follows from Theorem 3.9. Theorem 21.9. Let 1 < p < 1/p < a � 1/p + 1, 0 < < p - 1 if < d < b or I' > 0 if d = b. •
p.
I'
s
is
q
oo,
q
I'
a
408
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Let a - 1/p < 1. Then the operator 1:/ is bounded from Lp (p} , p(x) = lx - d l JJ ' a < d � b, into n-:;in( a- 1 /p , JJ /p) ,{J {p1 1P) if Jl. =I= ap - 1 and into ng - 1/p ,/J + 1/p' (p1/P) if Jl. = ap - L 2} Let a - 1/p = 1 . Then the operator 1:/ is bounded from Lp (p} , p(x) = l x - d l JJ , a < d < b, into H�fp ,fJ (p1 1P) and it is bounded from Lp (p) p(x) = (b - dy , into H6 /p , fJ (p1 1P) if p. < p or into H�·fJ+ 1/p' (p1 1P ) if p. � p. 1}
,
We prove this theorem following the scheme of proof of Theorem 3.11. Let = g(t} = It - dlv
Proof. ll p. fp,
l(x) =
J IXt -- dd l (x - t)0- 1 ln/J -x 1--t g(t}dt. X
V
(J
We are to prove that if a - 1/p < 1, then llllln;\,IJ �
c llg ii L, ,
� = min(a - 1/p, p.fp) for
p.
=I= ap - 1,
{21.24}
and if a - 1/p = 1 , then if d < b or d = b, p. < p, {21 .25} llllln•.�J+t/p' � ell g il L, , if d = b, p. � p. We fix the point a1 E (a, d). By Theorem 21.7 we have I E na- 1/P,P (a, at ) if a - 1/p < 1 and I E H 1 •P+ 11P' (a, a t ) if a - 1/p = 1 . We are to show that I satisfies the estimates {21.24} and {21.25} on [a t , d) . We represent I I = where and are the same in {21.13} but with xJJ being replaced by ld - xl v . Then by Theorem 2 1 .7 E na- 1/P ,/J if a - 1/p < 1 and E H1 •P+1/P' if a - 1/p = 1 . Now we represent the function = 1t J2 J3 where Jt , J2 and J3 are JJ the same in {21 .14} but with x being replaced by ld - x ! JJ . Let 0 < h � 1/2, a 1 < x < x h < d. Then for It we have ( x+h l (d - x - ht - (d - tY I 1 P ) 1/p' I Jd :>: l luiiL, ! I (d - t) " (x h - w -a In h - t I dt l lllln"'' · �' �
<)
W
ciiYIIL, ,
<) + W
as
<)
+
as
W as W
+
<) +
as
+
tJ
"+
1
(f -< c I g IIL,. lnfJ "Y
)
409
§ 21 . OPERATORS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
h
x+ x
h
1 /p ' (d - t) -vp ' dt ( z + h - t) ( l -a- v)p'
� ch a- 1 /p ln{J * 11 9 11 £ ,..
For J2 we find
[
1/ ' (X ) t)-"P dt (d "'f I h i � ch In{J x ii 9 IIL , c + Ct f ( t) ( l -a)p' 11
1
p
x -
]
.
Hence by the estimate for (3.27) with 11 = pfp we obtain if I' =F o:p - 1 ' if I' = o:p - 1. We observe that if o: - 1/p = 1, then pfp < 1 = o: - 1/p for a < d < b (by the assumption I' < p - 1 of the theorem). Therefore, only one case < o:p - 1 = p is realized here. Having fixed an arbitrary point 6 E (a, al ) we can rewrite J3 as p.
J3 =
(!6 + Jal + !) [(d - (d - t)(d" - t)"] a 6 a1
x
It
z)" -
x
[
"Y
z+h-t
1-] g(t)dt - ( z - tt -1 InfJ z-t
is obvious that I J31 I � chllg iiL,. . For J32 we have
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
410
Finally, for J33 we have
Hence we obtain I J331 :":: 2cha- l fP I J g l J L.
(! T(a- l)p' rnPp' :h dr) 1
1 /p '
cha- 1/p In� h1 llu i L,. if a 1 � h. As for the case a1 h, we find �
x -
x-
>
1/p < 1, 1/p = 1. Having collected the estimates for J1 , J2 and J3 we see that f satisfies the estimates (21.24) or (21.25) on [ab d]. The validity of the same on [d, b] with d < b is proved similarly. Since we have proved the estimates (21.24) and (21.25) on the intervals [a, a1 ], [a1 , dJ and [d, b] with d < b, they can be extended to [a, b] too. By arguments similar to those given above we can prove that f(d) = 0. This completes the proof. In conclusion of this subsection we remark that on the basis of Theorems 21.6-21.9 one may formulate the corresponding theorems for the case of the general power weight (1.7) - for example, the theorems similar to Theorems 3.10 and 3.12. We also note that in the case of the pure logarithmic kernel (a = 1) and 0 < f3 < 1/p' the assertions of Theorems 3.7 and 3. 9 can be improved - see remark 21.3 . if if
•
aa-
21.5.
411
§ 21. OPERATORS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
Asymptotic expansions
Asymptotic representations of the integrals I�f cp with power-logarithmic kernel can be found by the methods presented in § 16 for fractional integrals. In the cases when cp has the power asymptotics (16.5) or (16.6) or the power-logarithmic asymptotics (16.28) we can use the method of successive expansion or the method based on the Parseval equality (1.116) for the Mellin transform (1.112). If cp has the power-logarithmic asymptotics (16.29) two other ways can be also used: the method based on the representation of I�f cp as the Mellin convolution (1.114) and the method of direct estimates; see § 16 and § 17.1 (notes to §§ 16.2- 16.4). Let us obtain, for example, the asymptotic expansion of the integral
(J�: cp)(x) =
r(�) J0 (x - t) a- l ln" (x - t)cp(t)dt, z
0 < a < 1, v = 0, 1, 2, . . .
as x -+
(21.26)
+oo if cp has the power-logarithmic asymptotics (16.29). As in § 16.3 we
use the method of direct estimates. Theorem 21.10.
Let a function cp be locally integrable on [0, +oo) and 00
cp(t) """' t -P L an (ln t p -n n=O
as
t --+ oo
(21.27)
where 0 < P < 1, -oo < 'Y < oo are any fixed numbers. Then 00
(J�t cp)( x) """' x a- {j L bn (ln x) + "
-r -
n
(21.28)
n=O
as
x -+ oo where bn
1 � an � (,) ('Y - n + = bn (a , {J, v, "() = r(a) �0 - m f:'o k m - k
n = 0, 1, 2, . . .
m) nk,m-k (a , {J) , (21.29)
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
412
and 1 1 0 k,m (a, ,8) = (1 - r)a-1 T- ,8 }nk r}nm {1 - r}dT 0
{;) and (-r�n_�m ) being the binomial coefficients ( 1.48).
( ) r(�) 1 + 1 + 1
Proof. We represent {21.26} as (J;: 'I')(z) =
../i
� - ..ti
0
../i
�
�- ..ti
(z - t) " -1 In" (z t)
The integrals J1 cp and J3cp are asymptotically small in comparison with J2cp: where p1 > 0 and p2 > 0 are fixed numbers. Wee prove the estimate for J3cp. We choose c so that 0 +<e < a/3 . Since In'Y t = O(t ) t -+ we have from {21.27} that cp(t) = O(t -.B ) as t Substituting x - t = XT into J3cp we have the following inequalities for sufficiently large x: c
as
-+
oo
oo .
I
� - 1/ 2 (xr) a-1 lnv (xr)[x{1 - r}r ,8+e xdr J3cp � c 0 ../i
� cM_ ,8 + e x - ,8 +e I t a-1 ln v tdt 0
a-1 a-1 v a-1 +e ) as t where Ma = 0$_max and T $_ 1/ 2 {1 - r) . We have t ln t = O(t hence J0 t a-1 lnv tdt = O(x(a+e)f2 ) x -+ Taking this fact into account we obtain the estimate for J3cp with p2 = (a - 3c)/2. The estimate for J1 cp is proved similarly. fi
-+
as
oo.
oo
§ 21. OPERATORS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
413
We estimate J2 cp. By (21.27) we have N P cp(t) = t L an (ln t p - n + RN (t), RN (t) = O(t -.B (ln tp - N- 1 ) n=O
as
t
_.. oo.
(21.30)
Therefore N
J2 cp = t:o r (a) L(a, /3 , v, i - n ; x) + rN {x), "'"" an
(21.31)
where L(a, {3, 11, ; ; x) = rN (a: ) =
z - vz j (x - t) a- 1 ln" (x - t)t -P In" tdt, Vi
r(�) J
z - vz (a: - t)" - 1 ln" (a: - t)RN (t)dt.
(21.32)
Vi
We replace x - t by TX in (21.32) and have 1 - z - 112 L(a, {3, v, ;; x) =x a-,B ln" +1' x j (1 - T) a- 1 T-P z - 1/ 2
Since I t + ln(In1-zT) I <- !2 and l inIn zT I <- !2 for x- 112 -< T -< 1 - x - 112 we have [l + ln(l - T) ] " [t + In T ] -y lnx In x Substituting this expression into (21.33), carrying out the term-by-term integration
414
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
and using the estimates as z
J0
-+ oo
z -1 /2
J1
( 1 - T) 0- 1 T- ,8 lnm T lnk (1 - r)dr = O(z -6 1 )
(1 - r) 0- 1 T - P ln m T ln k (1 -
,
r)dr = O(z -62 ),
61 > 0,
62 > 0,
1-z- 1 /2
which are checked directly, we find the asymptotic expansion as z L( et, /1, v, -y; x)
�
.,a -fJ
-+ oo
f;. [� (�) (m::. k) nk,m- k (<>, /1}] (ln z)>+7-m .
(21.34)
At last, substituting (21.34) into (21.31) and taking into account the estimate which follows from (21 .30) we obtain rN (z) = O(za -fJ ln" +-r- N- 1 z) as z (21.28) and (21.29) . The theorem is proved. Remark 21.4. Theorem 21 . 10 generalizes Theorem 16. 4 and can be used to find the asymptotic solution of (21.26) ; see § 16.5 and § 34.2 (note 32.4). -+ oo
•
§ 22. Fractional Integrals and Derivatives in the Complex Plane
Our previous discussions have concerned functions of a real variable. We are now going on to consider ideas and notions connected with the fractional calculus of functions of a complex variable. It is worth-while emphasizing that the fractional calculus was developed in the complex plane from its very origin. - Liouville, Grunwald, Letnikov, Sonine and others. The following approaches to fractional calculus in the complex plane are known and widely used. I. Fractional integro-differentiation of analytic functions, represented by exponential series (Liouville 's approach) or power series (Hadamard's approach). These are 0based on termwise integro-differentiation of the series.�" Ther +equation a vz0)JJeaz-cr =inathee azlatterin thecaseformerservecasein factand asthedefinitions, equation V0(z - z0 ) = r(1+(lJJ-JJ)cr) ( and being arbitrary numbers. For functions f(z) = f(rei'P ) , analytic in a disc, Hadamard's approach is in fact Riemann-Liouville integro-differentiation with respect to the variable r. z -
n,
a
Jl
§
22. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS IN THE COMPLEX PLANE
415
II. Extension of Weyl fractional integro-differentiation to functions analytic in the disc by the rule
(22 .1 ) - Hardy and Littlewood. This is indeed the Weyl fractional integra-differentiation of a function / ( re i "' ) with respect to the angular variable t.p. III. Direct introduction of Riemann-Liou ville integro-differentiation in a
complex plane:
1
z
( Izoa f)( z) = f (a) J (
f(t)dt-
z -
zo
(V:0/)(z) =
:; (I;: - a f)(z),
t) l a ' Re a > 0,
m
= [Rea] + 1, Rea > 0,
(22.2) (22.3)
with integration along the straight line interval connecting points z0 and z as a rule. In general, one may use integration in (22.2) along a curve connecting zo and z and lying in the domain of definition of the function f( z) . The situation when the function is given on a certain curve only may be also admitted (see e.g. § 23. 1 (note 22.1 )) . We add that if a function f(z) is considered in a domain, then (22.2)-(22.3) with integration along the segment [z0 , z] implies that the domain is to be starlike relative to zo . The latter means that if a point z is in a domain, then the same is true for the whole segment [zo , z]. IV. A definition based on a generalization of the formula for differentiating the
Cauchy type integral:
j(a) (z ) =
f (l + a)
211" i
f(t)dt J (t - z) l+a
£
(22.4)
- Sonine, Laurent, Nekrasov and others. It ought to be· stressed that this approach
is to be applied only to analytic functions.
We emphasize that any work with definitions (22.2)-(22.4) requires precision aimed to single out a branch of the multivalued function. It is usually achieved by means of a cut which goes from the branching point to infinity or by fixing arg(t - z) in one or another way. Different choices of a cut, which fixes the branch of the function (t - z ) 1+a in (22.4), and of the curve L gives different values of j( a ) ( z) in general. We add finally that there exist various generalizations of these main approaches I-IV - see e.g. § 22.3.
416
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
For the sake of simplicity we consider a to be real throughout this section, although all the presentation is easily extended to the case when a is complex with Re a I 0.
22. 1 . Definitions and the main properties of fractional integra differentiation in the complex plane
Let a function f(z) be defined in a certain domain G in the complex plane. We shall adopt a direct extension (22.2) of the Riemann-Liouville integral as a basic definition in our presentation, considering the others to be conjecturally derived from (22.2). To make the integral in (22.2) exist for all z E G we consider the domainl-aG to be starlike relative to the point We have the multivalued function (z - t) in (22.2) . We fix the point z and select the principal value of the function (z - t) l-a to interpret the integral (22.2) uniquely. By this we mean the following. Since the point t lies in the interval [ ] we can choose from all possible values of the arg(z - t) a value which coincides with arg(z - t) = arg(z - ) (22.5) This, of course, requires us to fix ( ) Everywhere below we assume that 0 � ( ) < 21r. ( 22.6 ) Then proceeding from (22.5) we have Zo .
zo , z ,
zo .
arg z - zo .
arg z - zo
( 22.7)
The integral
z
f(t)dt , a > 0, (22.8) tp-a zJo ( with integration over the rectilinear segment [z0 , z] and with principal value (22.7) will be called a fractional integral of the function f(z) of order a. The condition given in (22.6) means that we consider the fractional integral (1:0 /)(z) in the (1zoa f)(z) =
1
r(a)
z-
complex plane with the cut along the ray which is parallel to the real axis and goes from z0 to the infinite point +oo + ilm z0 • From ( 22.8) and (22.7) we may write down 1';0 f also as . . a e• (1:0 f)(z) = f(a)tp J pa - l f( zo + (r - p)e'IP)dp 0 r
(22.9)
§ 22. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS IN THE COMPLEX PLANE
417
with cp = arg(z - zo), r = z - zo l · It is obvious that* there is no ambiguity now, concerned with the choice ofl a branch. If we denote f (p) = f(zo + pei'P ) , then r
(I:o f)(z) = eiai(J rta) I pa- l f*(r - p)dp.
(22.10)
0
So
the fractional integral 1':0f is a Riemann-Liouville fractional integral (Ig+ f* )(r) with respect to the radial variable r = l z - z0 l up to the factor ei a Since t = Zo + e(z - zo) with 0 � e � 1, after the obvious change of variable, we obtain from (22.8) the following equation 1 )a (z l (I;>. f)(z) = �=) < t - oa- l /[(1 -Ozo +ez)d{, (22.11) arg( z -zo )
.
0
where
(22.12) l = (z - zo)a- 1 (1 - e)a- l . Let We have used the fact that [(z -- lzo)(1 --e)]astress that, in general, (uv)a =F ua l va- l , the validity of equality being dependent on the choice of a branch of the power function. However, if u > 0, (22.13) whatever branch of the power function is chosen. We note finally that the fractional integral (1':0 f)(z) is defined at any point E G (or almost everywhere ) if f(z) is continuous ( locally integrable) . We shall call the expression in (22.3) a fractional derivative of order a. Similarly to (22.11) we may write in the case 0 < a < 1: 1 f((1 - e)zo + ez) de d 1 _ [ 1 (va f)(z) = f (1 - a) dz
z
zo
0
Let a function f(z) be locally integrable (continuous) in a domain G. Then for almost all (for all) z E G the semigroup property holds
Lemma 22.1.
(22.15)
418
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
The proof is similar to that in the real variable case - Theorem 2.5 - and is
obtained by direct interchange of the order of integration in the left-hand side of (22.15), which is possible by the Fubini theorem, and then by evaluation of the integral (22.16) J (t - () 1-�z - t ) 1 P = B(a, {J)(z - ()"+P-1 . The latter result is easily obtained after the change of variable t = ( + s(z - () (22.13) being taken into account. Let us consider now fractional integration corresponding to the case of the infinite point z0 • We denote T = ei9 , � (} < and introduce the operator z
-
'
,
1r ,
- 1r
1 (I+ ,fJ J)(z) = r(a)
f (zf(t)dt - t)l - a z
(22.17)
ei'·oo
with integration over the ray which goes from infinity to the point z parallel to the vector T = ei9 and with the principal value of (z - t) l - a . Here zo = ei9 oo formally and we would like to stress that the choice of (} in the interval [ ) corresponds to the agreement in (22.6) on the choice of arg(z- zo) = arg(z- ei9 oo) = arg ei(fJ+r) in the interval [0, 21r). Equation (22.17) assumes thei domain G, where the function / (z) is given, to be starlike relative to the point e 9 • �. This means that any point z belongs to G together with the whole ray (z, ei9 ) It is clear that such a domain is a half-strip, parallel to the vector T = ei9 • In particular, it may be a half-plane with • i a curvilinear boundary and containing the infinite point e 9 oo. The function (z) must have "good" behaviour at infinity to guarantee convergence of the integral.f We define also a "right-hand sided" fractional integral - 1r , 1r
·
·
· oo .
1 (I-a , fJ /)(z) - r(a) _
f
ei' ·oo z
f(t)dt (t - z)l - a
(22.18)
with integration from the point z along the ray ( z, ei9 • ) and with the power function taking its principal value. It is easily seen that oo
(22.19)
§ 22. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS IN THE COMPLEX PLANE
1- 1 f(z + pei9 ) p (I� , 9 f)(z) = e i9 a pl - a d r(a) 00
419
(22.20)
0
under the afore mentioned choice of the branch of the power function. We see from (22.19) and (22.20) that I- ,9 / e ia1r Ii- , 9 / . Nevertheless, it may be of benefit to use both constructions, because the operators Ii-,9 and I�.9 can be considered for different values of 0, which implies different domains of definitions for a function /(z), in general. Similarly to (23.3) we define operations m (Vt, /)(z) = ( ± : ) (J± ; a /)(z) , = [Rea) + 1, Rea > 0. (22.21) =
z
,
m
Now we single out the case r = =f 1 , i.e. (} = and (} = 0. Then in (22.17) and (22.18) we integrate along the ray which is parallel to the real axis. In this case, preserving the designation (5.2), we shall write Ii-, - 'lr/ = Ii-f and I�.of = I�/, so that 1 p (I±a f)(z) = _1_ f(z =f ) dp, (22.22) - 1r
00
r (a)
p l- a
0
according to (22.19) and (22.20). The corresponding fractional derivatives have the form
( � r (f± -a/)(z)
(V±f)(z) = ±
due to (22.21). Fractional integra-differentiation (V±f)(z) implies that a function /(z) is defined in a horizontal half-strip with a curvilinear "vertical" boundary, i.e . left-hand or right-hand respectively for the signs + and - . In the case 0 < Rea < 1 the fractional derivative in (22.21) may be represented in Marchaud form as oo i(9 1 ae - +1r)a f(z) - f(z + pei9 ) p (Va ,9 /)(z) d +
f(1 - a)
pl +a
0
.
(following the same lines as in § 5, see (5.56) and (5.57)). One may analogously write (V�.9 f)(z) also. In the case Rea � 1 we have to use considerations of the type (5.80): oo e - i(9+1r)a 1 (� �ei• /)(z) p (22.21') (V+a 9 f)(z) d , ,
x(a, l)
0
pl +a
where (��e., f)(z) is a finite difference (5.72) with step pei9 , the constant x(a, l) being given by (5.81). The passage from (22.21) to (22.21') may be achieved in
420
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
the case of sufficiently good functions in a similar fashion to the transformations in
. § 5.5. We would like to emphasize that the fractional derivative may exist in the
form (22.21') in the case when it does not exist in the form (22.21), as has already been seen in the real variable situation - § 5. Hence the domain of definition of the operator generated by the right-hand side of (22.21') is in general larger than that of the operator (22.21). Thus it might be expedient to denote it with a different designation as in (5.80).
(D+ ,, J)(z),
22.2. Fractional integro-differentiation of analytic functions Riemann-Liouville fractional integra-differentiation (22.8) and (22.3) of an analytic function gives an analytic function again only in the case of integer a, yielding functions which have as a branch point in the case of non-integer a (this is immediately seen from (22.11) and (22.14)). Thus in desiring. to preserve analyticity we have to modify the definition of fractional integra-differentiation so that it does not yield branching. We might, for example, give up the factor in (22.11) or in (22.14). This is equivalent to consideration of 1:a 1 and instead of and v o respectively. Very often this way is used in consideration of (generalized ) fractional integra-differentiation of analytic functions, see the next subsection. Now in preserving the initial definitions {22.8) and (22.3), we, on the contrary, enlarge the set of functions in hand by allowing them to have as a branching point from the very outset . More precisely, we assume that the function has the form f(z) = (z - zo ) JJ g(z), I' E R1 , where is analytic in some neighbourhood of the point zo . Then
z0
(z - zo) - a v:0[( z - zo)a /(z)] g(z)
1:0/
z0
(z - zo)a(z - zo) a
:f
/(z) 00
f(z) = L:O ck (z - zo)k +JJ ,
(22.23)
k
Any branching that arises here will be removed by the choice of the principal value such that z JJ is analytic in the complex plane with a cut along the ray + oo ) and
(z - 0)
(zo, zo
(z - zo)P = l z - zoiJJ e iJJ arg(z - zo) , Lemma 22.2.
Let f(z) be a function
(Vzao !)( ) _ (
Z - Z - ZQ
as
0 � arg(z - zo) < 27r.
given in (22.23). Then for all a E R1
r (k + J.t + 1) k )JJ - Q � L..J f(k + - a + 1) ck ( Z - ZQ ) , k=O
I'
I' =/; -1, -2, -3, . . . ,
(22.24)
§ 22. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS IN THE COMPLEX PLANE
421
the radii of convergence of the series (22.23) and (22.24) being coincident with each other.
A similar statement was earlier proved in the case of analytic functions on the real axis (see Lemma 15.4). Lemma 22.2 is proved analogously if we take into account the possibility of integrating and differentiating (22.23) term l3 by term and using the formula V�0[(z - zo ) ] = r(J�!�1) (z - zo ) /3 - a . The latter is established directly in view of (22.16). Equation (22.24) connects the initial definitions of fractional integro-differentiation given in (22.2) and (22.3) with Hadamard's approach. As for Liouville's approach, it is connected with the fractional integro-differentiation defined in (22.17), (22.18) and (22.21). The formula
(22.25) is derived immediately from (22.21) and (22.19) in view of (7.5). The right-hand side of (22.25) depends in fact on 8 : the value of 8 influences the choice of branch for aa. Namely, in (22.25) aa denotes aa = lalae i aArga, 0 < 8 + Arga < 21r (which in fact may be specified as 1r/2 < 8 + Arg a < 37r /2 due to the condition Re(aei8) < 0). In particular
(22.26) (22.27) with the principal value of (±a)a. It follows from (22.26) and (22.27) that functions 00 f(z) representable by Dirichlet series f(z) = L: akeA•z , where all ReA�: > 0 or all
k=l
ReA�: < 0, admit the formulae
00
(Vt.f)(z) = L a�:Ak' e A•z ,
k= l
ReA�: > 0,
00
(V�f)(z) = I: a�:(-Ak )a e A,. z ,
ReA�: < 0 k= l (Liouville wrote eva /)(z) = E a�:Ak'eAicZ by definition, whatever AA: were). 1: 00
=1
We now pass to one of the most important questions in the theory of fractional differentiation of analytic functions: that is the extension of the Cauchy formula
422
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
to non-integer values of n. Here the multivalued function (t - z) - a - 1 arises. To single out its one-valued branch we cut the plane by the ray which passes from z through z0 to infinity ( we r �call that we are now considering functions of the form {22.23)) and deal with the single-valued function (z being fixed)
{22.28) in the plane with such a cut. It is assumed that the principal value of arg(t - z) is chosen, i.e. arg (t - z) = 0, if t - z > 0. Since the cut may prove to be parallel to the real axis and lie to the right of the point z, we specify this choice by the condition arg ( t - z) l t ec+
where
E ( -271", 0],
{22.29)
C+ is the edge of the cut , indicated at Fig. 1 .
Fig. 1. Contour of integration
Let f(z) = (z - z0 )JJ g(z), where I' > -1, g(z) is analytic in a domain G and the principal value of (z - z0 )JJ is chosen. Then
Theorem 22.1.
+ o:) ('Dzao f)(z) = f { 127ri
J c. o
f(t)dt (t - z) l +a
{22.30)
for all o: E R 1 , except o: = - 1 , -2, . . . , where the principal value of the function (t - z) -a- 1 is fixed by {22.28) and {22.29), while the closed contour Lz0 lying in the domain G is any one that passes through the point z0 and goes round the point z in positive direction. 1/, in particular, we choose the circle It - z l = l z - zol as L z 0 , we have (Vexzo )(z)
=
f { 1 + o: )
2�
e - •a(J f(z + l z - zol e'"(J )dO. 27r l z - zol a J 0 .
{22.30')
§ 22. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS IN THE COMPLEX PLANE
423
Proof. Let a < 0 first. Since the integrand in (22.30) is analytic in the domain G with the cut along the ray from z to zo , then by the Cauchy integral theorem we have
r(1 + a) j f(t)dt = f(1 +. a) [ hm . 2 1r1 ''Y+-c+ 2 1r1 (t - z) 1 + a ·
j
.
+ ... + hm
.., _ _ c_
'"f+
t:, •o
j
.
+ ... + hm
..,_
-, - { z }
j ...] , ..,
where "Y± are straight lines parallel to the edges of the cut and "Y is a circle of radius £ enveloping the point z (see Fig. 1). So by the jump of (t - z) - 1 - a at the cut we have
f(1 + a) 21fi
J
t:. . 0
f(1 + a) (1 e- 2a� i ) f(t)dt (t - z) 1 + a = 21fi _
z
J
zo
f(t)dt (t - z) 1 +a
(22.31)
With con,dition (22.29) we see that (t - z) - 1 - a = e-( l + a) �i (z - t) - 1 -a , where (z - t) - 1 -a coincides with the value chosen in (22.7) with 1 - a being replaced by -1 - a. Therefore from (22.31) we obtain
f(1 + a) 21fi
J
t:, •o
f(t)dt = (Izo-a /)(z), (t - Z p + a
(22.32)
which proves (22.30) for a < 0. Starting from (22.3) if a > 0 we arrive at (22.30) after differentiating (22.32), with a - [a] - 1 being written in place of a, the corresponding number of times under the integral sign. • We remark that the right-hand side of (22.30) is often adopted as an initial definition of a fractional derivative of any order a, a =/; -1, -2 . . . . Remark 22.1. It is convenient to represent
(vzoa /)(Z ) =
f(1 + a) 2 1fl t:,J ( 1 •o ·
(22.30) as
_
z -zo
t - zo
)f(t)dt 1 +a (t
_
Z0 ) 1 + a
the contour Cz0 being the same. The convenience is in fact that we deal with standard cuts: it is assumed that the principal value of the function (1 - w) 1 + a is
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
424
chosen, considered in the plane cut along the rays (-oo, -1) and (1, +oo), while the principal value of (t - z0 ) 1 + a is treated in the plane cut along the ray from z through zo to infinity. If, in particular zo = 0, we have
(22.33) where Co goes around
z passing through the origin.
� c Fig.
2.
Pochhammer loop
J.l
22.1 may be replaced by J.l =/= 0, ±1, ±2, . . . if one takes a so-called Pochhammer loop C = (z+, z 0 +, z- , z0 - ) instead of the contour C z o and changes the coefficient before the integral, thus Remark 22.2. The restriction
>
-
1 in Theorem
f(t) = (t - zo) JJ g(t) .
(22.33'}
- Lavoie, Tremblay and Osler [1]. We shall also discuss (22.30) corresponding to the infinite initial point zo = ei 9 oo, -1r $ (} < 1r. Let a function f(z) be analytic in a curvilinear half-plane Gs containing the infinite point e i9 oo. Similarly to Theorem 22.1 we obtain for all a R 1 , a =/= -1, -2, . . . , the equation •
•
E
+ a) f(t) dt (v+,a fJ f)( z) = f ( l21ri J (t - z)l +a £,
(22.33" )
'
with any Hankel contour £ 9 = C9(z) , which envelopes the ray ( z, e i9 oo) in the positive direction (Fig. 3). It is assumed that the principal value of the function (t - z ) 1 + a = I t - z l l + a e i(l + a) arg(t - z ), analytic in the plane cut along the ray ( z , e i 8 oo) is fixed by the condition arg(t - z) l t e c+ (- 21r, 0] so that •
E
•
arg(t
- z) l t e c+ = { (},(} - 27r, 0-1r< $(} <(} $27r.0,
§ 22. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS IN THE COMPLEX PLANE
425
Fig. 3. Hankel contour In conclusion of this subsection we give without proof the Hardy-Littlewood theorem of the mapping properties of fractional integration
(Ioa/)(z)
=
6
1
f(a)
f 0
f(t)dt (z - t) l - a
1 f = r�:) (1 - e) a- 1 f(ze)tJe
(22.34)
0
in Hardy spaces Hp . We recall that the Hardy space functions /(z) analytic in the unit disc and such that
Hp 0 < p < oo, consists of ,
211'
/ 1/(rei'P)jP d
Theorem 22.2.
Let 0 < p < oo, 0 < a < 1/p, 1 > - 1 . The operator
is bounded from Hp into H9,
1/q = 1/p - a.
may b e found in the original papers by Hardy and Littlewood [5) , [7) or in the book by Zygmund [6, p .209) - compare Theorem 22.2 with Theorem 3.5 and 3.7.
The proof
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
426
22.3. Generalization of fractional integro-differentiation of analytic functions Let the function 00
/(z) = L h:zk k=l
(22.35)
be analytic in the unit disc so that by (22.24)
(
-na
vo
/) z ) =
(
z � � f(kf(k- +a +1) 1) JkZk . -a
,
(22.36)
f(k+ 1)/f(k - a + 1)
A natural way to generalize the (22.36) is to replace the factor in (22.36) by a more general one. We begin with the generalization which is known as generalized Gel'fond-Leont'ev differentiation. Starting from the simple fact that usual differentiation d/dz corresponds to the factor in (22.36) , we introduce, following Gel'fond and Leont'ev the operation
[1],
f(k + 1)/f(k)
(22.37)
a(z) = L at z k . The function a ( z ) is assumed to be entire of order p and of k =O type u =f 0 ( as regards these ideas, see for example the book of Leont'ev [1]). Let where
00
also
(22.38) We remark that (22.38) is always satisfied in the case of the upper limit limt-oo - Leont'ev p.13] . From (22.38) we see that there exists the limit -oo "-v'lat - n/at l = so the series in (22.37) has the same radius of convergence klim as (22.35). The operator in (22.37) is called the Gel'fond-Leont'ev operator of generalized differentiation. It is obvious that 'D" (a ; f) = d" f dz" in the case
[1, 1,
a(z) = ez.
/
The operator (22.39)
which is the right inverse to (22.37) , will be called the
of generalized integration.
Gel'fond-Leont 'ev operator
We obverse that although operators V" and I" are introduced as direct generalizations concerning integer order n of integra-differentiation, they contain
§ 22. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS IN THE COMPLEX PLANE
that for fractional order case:
as
427
well. To show this, let us consider the following special
k a(z) = Ea (z) = t; r (<>; + l) , 00
<> > 0,
(22.40)
i.e. the case of Mittag-LefHer function It has order p = type u = and satisfies (22.38). The corresponding operator for generalized integration of order n = is
(1.90).
1
1/o:,
r(o:k + 1) k Zk+ 1 • ( v a/)(Z) d:2J1 (E1/a .' /) = � r � (o:k + 0: + 1) J F
,
1
(22.41)
The operator of generalized integration defined in (22.41) admits the following integral representation
Lemma 22.3.
( :Ta f)(z) =
1 � r( ) J (1 - t) a- 1 f( zta)dt.
(22.42)
0
The proof of the lemma becomes clear if we observe that
r(o:k + 1) -_ B(o:,o:k + 1) -_ -1 11 <1 - t )a- 1 t ak dt. r (o:k + o: + 1) r(o:) r(o:)
--:-�----�
0
Lemma 22.3 allows us to extend the definition of the integration type operator (22.41) from analytic functions f(z) to continuous functions (and even integrable ones), given in a domain starlike in respect to the origin. We also observe that
1 .l. - 1 1 (.Ja )(z) = r(o:) J (z: - t: ) a- 1 f(t) t� dt, /
0
0
where we have integration along the rectilinear interval connecting points and z, the principal values of multivalued fnnctions being chosen in a proper way. Thus the operator :Ta may be also interpreted as a fractional integral operator of order of a function f(z) by the function g(z) = z 1 l a - see § 18.2. Based on 8.29 , we
o:
(1 )
428
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
can construct the operator Va which is the ( left ) inverse to .Ja : z 1 1 d f f(t )g'(t)dt (Va f)(z) = (1 - ) (z) dz f a g' (g (z) - g (t)]a ' 0
where g (z) = z 1 f a . Simple transformations lead to
(Va f)( z) =
1 ( 1 - a + a .!!_ ) f1 f(zt0)dt . f(l - a) z dz (1 - t)a
(22.43)
0
The operator Va corresponds to the expansion (v
�
a /)( z ) = L.., k= l
r(ka + 1) !. f(ka + 1 - a) A:Zk- l •
(22.44)
We can extend our generalizations further, replacing r(}�!�)l ) in (22.36) by an arbitrary sequence bk satisfying certain assumptions. Thus, let the function 00
b(z) = L bk z k k:O
(22.45)
be analytic in the unit disc. Let us consider the operator 00
V{b; f} = b o f = L bkfk zk . k:O
(22.46)
This expression is known as the Hadamard product composition of functions b(z) and /(z). Of course (22.46) is a very wide generalization of the integra-differentiation notion. It will indeed generalize differentiation if bk --+ oo as --+ oo. Equation (22.46) is invertible if bk ::/= 0, = 0, 2, . . . and we shall denote
k
k 1,
00
b. (z) = L z k /bk . k=O
(22.47)
§ 22. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS IN THE COMPLEX PLANE
429
in this case. The corresponding operator
l{b; f} = V{b* ; /} = f
k =O
{kk zk
may be called a generalized integration under the assumption that b��: -+ oo. We observe that the functions b( z) and b * ( z) are usually called associated (with each other ) , - Smirnov and Lebedev [1, p.168] .
Let the series in (22.45) and (22.47) converge in the unit circle. If , where f(z) is analytic for l z l < 1, then g(z) = b / Lemma 22.4. o
1
g (z) = 27ri f(z) = 2 1
7r
.
b J ltl= r
( z ) f(t ) tdt , t
( z ) g (t) dt , b * j i t t
lzl < r < 1 .
(22.48)
(22.49)
l tl=r
Equations ( 22 48 ) and (22.49) are obtained by the expansion of f(t), g(t), b(z/t) and b* (z/t) in corresponding series and by termwise integration. Choosing various functions b(z), we shall obtain integro-differentiation operations of various types. Let us consider the examples. 1 . Let
+ o:) � f( 1 + o: + k) z k , l z l < 1. b(z) = ( f(1 = l+ 1 - z) a � f( 1 + k) Then V{b; /}
(22.50)
= E r}ii:t)k) f��: zk , which coincides with k= O
V{b; f} = V� [za f(z)]
(22.51)
by (22.24), or with
V{b; f} =
r(�; f(t ) dt j i (1 - f) l+a t o: )
(22.52)
l tl=r
by (22.48), cf. (22.30) and (22.33). Therefore, the choice (22.50) of the function b(z) gives Riemann-Liouville fractional differentiation of the function z a f(z). Equation
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
430
(22.51) allows us to obtain the operator I{b; /} inverse to V{ b; /} in the form 1 l 1 a I{b; !} = z (It:f)(z) = r(<>) (1 - W- 1 /(zt)dt. (22.53) By (22. 49) it may be also written as (22.54) I{b;f} = 21ri1 I 2F1 (1, 1; 1 + n; tz ) f(t) tdt , ltl =r with l z l r 1, the hypergeometric function 2Ft ( 1 , 1 ; 1 +a; z) = b.(z) arising here as the associated kernel. If we took b(z) = ���� : instead of (22.50), we would obtain 0
<
<
(22.55) This latter construction is sometimes called the
2. Let b(z) = 1:=L:1 (ik)azk . Then 00
Ruscheweyh fractional derivative.
V{b; f} = L (i kyr h: zk 00
(22.56)
k= l
V�a) /, is the
fractional differentiation by Weyl: it coincides with Weyl differentiation - see (19. 6 ) - of a function f(z) = /(re i "') with respect to the angular
variable q;. Finally, let us choose
3.
integra-differentiation
b(z) so that V{ b; /} coincides with the generalized
1 I (L(w) f)(z) = - f(zt)w '(t)dt
(22.57)
0
of Dzherbashyan - see
18.6 .
(22.57)
§ We observe that may be regarded as the result of applying the operator to the function f(z) with respect
(18.110)
= /(rei"')
§
23.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER
4
431
to the radial variable r. Starting from (18.111)-( 18.1 14) we introduce the function 00
b(z) = L 6.w (k)zlc . lc =O Then it is obvious that V { b; /} = (L(w) f)(z). As regards other generalizations, see subsection 23.2 (notes 22.3, 22.5, 22.8, 22.15, 22.16 and 22.18).
§ 23. Bibliographical Remarks and Additional Information to Chapter 4 23. 1 . Historical notes
(18.50) (18.6) (18. 1 ) (18. 3 ) [13],[2] (1971) -1; [6], (18.2) (18.4) {18.8) also
[1] {1940). (18.13) (18.14) [6] (1950),
Notes to § 18.1. The operators and were introduced by Kober The operators and with a = and b = +oo were put forward by Erdelyi see also and the operators and in the form and were given by a > -n . Lowndes a> The operators are known to be associated with the names of Erdelyi and Kober; it appears that Sneddon was the first who named them in this way. We note, however, that the operator
:r: 2 +1 (APJ)(:r:) f{1 p)r(1/2- p) J (xt2 '1- t2f(t)dt )P+ l/2 ' �:r;'lo+ 'l'lf (A ( 1/2 -a ) J)(:r:) a/2208]-a) I11,a f(:r:) [1, p.129] (1951). 2t( [ 6 , p. A (p) xp.2"10) {1832). [1, (18.1 5), (18.16) (18.1(18.5) 18) (18.18) {18.5) (18.(18.1)6) (18.3) [ 1 ] (1940). 0 b {18.16') (18.41') [6] {1950),0 (18.b17) [2] (1971), [6] (1980). [10, p.243-244) (1984) 8.4. Fp ,, , 1{18.� 16')� 1, 0 [5)[4) (1940) (1964). 1 {18.20) {18.22) 2 {18.15)-(18.23) (18.19), (18.5) (18.8)(18.6) 23.2 18.[2] 2(1962).18.3)). 10] {1866), [n;[1,7) p.{1835). :(:r:) fl (x)D;:(:r:) ... n;:(:r:) /n (x)u(:r:), /j (:r:) =
,fi
+
0
= such that is also known as Sonine's operator, see commentaries in Sonine's book and Levitan In the latter paper the operator was considered as transforming trigonometric functions into Bessel functions in connection with expansions in Bessel functions series. We must add that the idea connected with a fractional differentiation ''by the function or "by the function .../X" may already be found in the papers by Liouville as for example, Equations and for the operators and were obtained by Kober Relations and for the operators and with a = and = +oo were given by Erdelyi are due to Lowndes Equations and with a = and = +oo were established by McBride who gave conditions for their validity in the space p oo . For the latter, see subsection The case a = a = in the first relation in the can be found in Buschman In the case a = the representations and were obtained by Erdelyi for the truncated modified Hankel and Kober transforms. These, however, were more general, than and (see § (notes and In the case a = for the operators were given in Sneddon Notes to § 18.2. The fractional integral of a function by another function is an idea already known to mathematicians of the past century. It was in fact introduced by Holmgren although indications of such an idea were in embryo suggested by Liouville Holmgren's paper contained a detailed investigation of compositions of the form denoted the operation of multiplication where •
432 by the function
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
/;(x),
and
D�(z)
was the fractional differentiation "by a function
B; (x)".
u(x).
The composition of operators was applied to The modern papers, where the notion of differentiation of a function by another one appeared again, are those of Erdelyi Talenti and Erdelyi The case of integration of integer order was treated by Shelkovnikov Some simple properties of fractional integrals of a function by another were considered by Chrysovergis We also note that such integrals can be found in an implicit form in Sewell ch. s. in the proof of the invariance property of fractional differentiability of functions given on curves under conformal mappings. Fractional integrals of a function by another in the complex plane were investigated by Osler Fractional differentiation of a function by another in Griinwald-Letnikov form (which was considered in § was studied by Krasnov Theorem was proved by Erdelyi the proof, however, not being complete. The rep tability by a fractional integral was not justified. Notes to § 18.3 . Fractional integro-differentiation was introduced by Hadamard Modification of Hadamard fractional differentiation by the Marchaud-type form was not introduced elsewhere. Notes to § 18.4. Bessel fractional integration has been known for a long time. It was widely investigated in the papers by Aronzajn and Smith , Aronzajn, Milia and Szeptycki and Aronzajn which were devoted to multidimensional Bessel potentials. Fractional integro-differentiation (E ± 1>)0 , considered in § was known, as for example, in Live 's book where it may be found in the form adapted to the case of the half-axis. The forms (E ± D )0 of this operator, used here, are contained in Karapetyants and Samko The relation was proved there as well. In this paper the operators (E ± were used to investigate the normal solvability of singular integral equations by convolutions (having discontinuous symbol) . We note the paper by Karapetyants where the operators (E± D)0 were applied to solve Wiener-Hop{ integral equations (with a symbol which a vanishing of fractional order.) The statement of Theorem has to be considered as known, although it was not apparently given elsewhere in an obvious form. The statement of Theorem on the coincidence of with in the case < p < is also known, being an immediate corollary of results by Rubin on the continuation and restriction of fractional integrals (Theorems and in this book) . In its direct form Theorem is in the fact contained in the paper by Biacino Theorem Notes to § 18.5. The constructions of fractional integration which are considered here were introduced by Chen where Lemma and Theorem were also proved. Here we have given proofs different from those in Chen We also remark that there is an error in the proof of Theorem in this paper. Notes to § 18.6. The constructions which are under consideration were introduced by Dzherbashyan Notes to § 1 9.1-19.3. The definition of fractional differentiation of periodic functions, considered in Section is due to Weyl A beautiful presentation of the results for Weyl fractional integro-differentiation can be found in the book by Zygmund Ch. XII, § We have used the ideas of this book while elucidating some results in Section Fractional integro-differentiation of almost periodic functions was studied in the papers by Love Nagy Takahashi and Bang The first of these papers dealt also with arbitrary bounded functions given on the whole line. - see § (note The representation of the function via the Riemann zeta-function was observed by Mikolas The connection with the zeta-function was noted in different way by Hardy
[9], (1964), [1] (1965)[1] (1951). also [14] (1970). [2, 3, [1]14](1971). (1937) [1], [2] (1970), [5), [7) (1972). 20.4) [2) (1977). 18. 1 [ 9 ] (1964) resen (18.42) [(18.1] 5(1892). 6)-(18.58) (18.61) [1] (1961 ) [1] (1963) [1] (1965) 18.4, rman [1, p.28-31] (1964) (18.71) [1] (1975). (18.73) D)0 also (t] (1977), has 18.2 18.3 H••P ([a, b]) l0 [Lp(a,[1] b))(1972) 1 (18.1/a78) 13.9 13.10[2, 18.3 2.1] (1984). [2] (1961)) 18.[2].1 18.4 18.4 (4] (1967), [5] (1968). 19, [1] (1917). main 8, [ 6 , 19. [1] (1938), 9). [2] (1939), [1] (1940) [1] (1941). 9.2 5.3). (19.9) .P+ (x) [1] (1959). [2] (1922). (19.11) 19.1 q;+(x), .P+ (x) (6, [1 ,12, 8].(1917), [1] (1938), also(19.19} (1] (1953). (19.18)
The representation of the function in the form is due to Weyl p.300] the proof of Lemma follows the presentation in the book by Zygmund Ch. § Some properties of the Weyl kernel which are of importance in the theory of approximation by trigonometric polynomials, were obtained by Nagy and see Dzyadyk The construction has not been dealt with before. The assertion was observed by
§ 23. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 4
433
Weyl [1 , p.300] (1917). The representation of the Weyl fractional integral in the fonn (19.21) was suggested by Mikolas [1, p.80] (1959).
Relations (19.24) and (19.25) have apparently not been noted elsewhere. The operators a) (convolutions with the kernel Ka , JJ (x)) were widely used in the approximation theory of periodic functions, as in the papers by Nikol'skii, Efimov and Telyakovskii, cited in § 23.2 (note 19.6). Notes to § 19.4. A formal coincidence (19.35) of the Weyl fractional derivative with the Marcbaud derivative can be in fact found in Weyl [1 , p.301-302] (1917) . Lenuna 19.4 is new in a sense. Notes to § 19.5. Theorem 19.2 was proved in Samko [33] (1985). The equivalence of ( 19.46) and (19.47) in Theorem 19.3 was shown by Butzer and Westphal [1 , p.129] (1975). Notes to § 19.6. The estimates (19.48) and (19.49) and Theorem 19.6 were proved by Murdaev [2] (1985). The statement of the Corollary of Theorem 19.6 in the case � + a < 1 was obtained by Hardy and Littlewood [3, p.589] (1928), where the statement of Remark 19.4 was also given; the case a + � = 1 is due to Zygmund [2, p.53] (1945). Theorems 19.7 and 19.8 were proved by Murd.aev [2] (1985). The statement of the Corollary of Theorem 19.7 and the assertion (19.62) are due to Hardy and Littlewood [3, p.576 and 591] (1928), see also [2] (1926). Notes to § 19.7. The results presented here, except the isomorphism (19.71 ) , are due to Hardy and Littlewood [3, p.592-604] (1928). Notes to § 19.8. An extension of the Bernstein inequality for trigonometric polynomials to fractional derivatives in C([O, 21r])-nonn was given firstly by Civin [1] (1940), [2] (1941 ). In fact in other terms it can be found in Sewell [2, p.1 1 1] (1937). We remark that a similar inequality for fractional derivatives of algebraic polynomials, given on a finite interval was in fact obtained by Montel [1, p.170] (1918). An extension to the case of Lp(O, 21r)-norm, 1 � p � oo is due to Ogievetskii [3], [4] (1958). We note that Civin considered a more general case of entire functions of exponential type, but the constant in the inequality was rough. The sharp constant equal to 1 , as in the classical Bernstein inequality, was obtained by Lizorkin [3] (1965) for all a 2: 1 in the case of entire functions of exponential type as well. The simple proof for 0 < a < 1 presented in Theorem 19.10 yields the constant given in (19.74). This proof follows Geisberg [2] (1967). In a more general form (19.81), the Bernstein inequality for fractional derivatives was obtained in another way by Bang [1 , p.21-22] (1941). Wilmes [1], [2] obtained the Bernstein inequality (for functions of exponential type) with the sharper constant 21 - a , 0 < a < 1 . T he Favard type inequality (19.82) for fractional integrals of periodic functions f(x) =
If,
00
E ai eib was obtained first by Nagy [1 , p.123] (1938).
i =m
Notes to § 20.1 . Relations representing fractional differentiation as a limit of a difference quotient, appeared first in Liouville [2, p.107-110] (1832), It was used by Liouville in [6, p.224] (1835) to formally derive the Fourier expression for fractional differentiation by his approach, and also in [2, p.136] (1832) to evaluate fractional derivatives of the functions e4� sin bx and e4� cos bx. These cases were not developed in Liouville's papers. In 1867 Griinwald's paper [1] appeared in which an approach to fractional integra-differentiation via (20.7) or, more precisely, via (20.42) was developed. However, his arguments were not quite strict. The correct construction of a complete theory of fractional calculus on the basis of this approach appeared a year later in the paper by Letnikov [1) (1868). To illustrate the independence of Letnikov's investigation of Griinwald's work we cite here Letnikov's contemporary Sludskii [1] (1889). He wrote: "A.V. Letnikov's research was to serve as a dissertation for a Master's degree. It was already almost completed when there appeared in one of the last issues of Schlomilch journal in Moscow the paper by Dr. Griinwald. Letnikov, to his great surprise, found in this paper results which he had obtained by rather different methods. For this reason he at once came to decision not to present his work for his Master's degree , but also not even to publish it. Only due to the insistence of A.Yu. Davydov, who undertook to declare at the viva that the most important results of Letnilcov's work were obtained before his acquaintance with Griinwald's paper, was this decision repealed" . We add that certain discussions of the difference quotient approach may be also found in Most [1] (1871).
434
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
It should be noted that both Griinwald and Letnikov dealt with researches in the complex plane, taking an increment h in (20. 7) to be in fact complex with a fixed direction defined by the initial point a, see (20.42). Their approach fell into disuse for a long time, since Riemann-Liouville forms of a fractional integro-differentiation were considered as evidently more preferable. Many years later there appeal"ed the papers by Ferrar [1] (1928), Stuloff [1] (1951), Moppert [1] (1953), Mikolas [4] (1963), [5] (1964), where the Griinwald-Letnikov approach was presented from a more modern point of view. Examples were considered and connections with other forms were retraced and so on. We add that Letnikov ' s approach was also presented by Ju.L. Rabinovich [1]. This approach found a new life with the publication of the papers by Westphal [1] (1974), and Butzer and Westphal [1] (1975), where it was interpreted from the point of view of modern function theory, and where various classical questions of fractional calculus were connected with modern problems of fractional analysis and function theory. Further development can be found in the papers by Butzer, Dyckhoff, Gorlich and Stens [1] (1977), Bugrov [1] (1985), [2] (1986), Samko [33] (1985), [34] (1990). We note finally that the approach via fractional differences within the framework of generalized functions was developed by Bred.imas (I]-[5] (1973-1976) . The representation (20.31) for the constant (20.3) and the identity C(a) :: 2 for 0 < a < 1 were noted by Burenkov and Sobnak [1] (I985). The generalized differentiation a (1> ) as in (20.10), was introduced by Post [2, p.726] (1930) . We note that the generalized differentiation va log 1> or r,o(1> ) log 1> was investigated by Davis [4, p.78-85] (1936) on the basis of another approach. Notes to § 20.2. We used here constructions from the papers by Westphal [3] , [4) {I974) , an d also Butzer and Westphal [I] (I975). In particular, the functions (20.I4) and (20.15) were introduced there. Lemma 20.I was proved by Westphal [3, p.560], see also Butzer and Westphal [1 , p.127-128]. We have given another proof of the first statement in this lemma, based on the technique of the Wiener ring of absolutely integrable Fourier integrals. We note that this statement was known to Bosanquet [5] (1945) , see Westphal [4, p.562]. Lemma 20.2 and Theorem 20.1 were obtained by Butzer and Westphal [1, p.128-129]. Theorem 20.2 is new. Theorem 20.3 was proved by Butzer and Westphal [1 , p.I33]. Notes to § 20.3. Theorem 20.4 was proved by Samko [33] (1985), [34] {I990), cf. also [35) . A new version of Theorem 20.4 is contained in Westphal [4, p.568] {1974) in the general context of fractional powers of operators, but under the restriction that functions and their fractional derivatives belong to the same space - see § 23.2 (note 20.1) . In the case of an infinite axis such an assumption is essentially restrictive. Theorems 20.5 and 20.51 are analogues of Theorem 20.3 and have not been noted elsewhere; a close version of Theorem 20.5 (with r = p and I < p < oo ) can be found in Bugrov [1 , p.62, 64] {1985). Notes to § 20.4. Definitions {20.42) and (20.46) go back to Griinwald and Letnikov. The coincidence (20.47) of the integral (20.46) with the Riemann-Liouville integral had already been shown by Griinwald [1, p.455-458] {1867), and Letnikov [1 , p.19] (1868) in the case of sufficiently good functions. Theorem 20.6 is new. Notes to § 21.1. Theorem 21.1 for the operators I:f with a power-logarithmic kernel was proved by Kilbas [1] (1975) for integer {3 and -y = 1 . In the general case this theorem was obtained by Kilbas also, the proof was not published earlier. Notes to § 21.2. Theorems 21.2 and 21.3 were obtained by Kilbas [6] (1978) for integer {3 and -y = I in the case of the weight p(:z:) = a) ll with 0 � #J. < ..X + 1 or the general weight (3.1 2) with 0 � IJ. l < ..X + I, ..X + a < I-Lk < ..X + I , k = 2,3, . . . , n. These theorems in the general case were proved by Kilbas, and were not published earlier. Notes to §§ 2 1 .3 and 21 .4. The results presented here are new being obtained by Kilbas. The generalized power-logarithmic Holderian property of purely logarithmic integrals
(:z: -
z
(/�+'� r,o)(:z:) = j ln� _2_rp(t)dt, :z: - t a
rp
E
Lp (a, b), {3 > o,
observed in Remark 21 .3, was shown by Kilbas and Samko [I] (I978) in the case p > Ifa.
§
23.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 4
435
Notes to § 2 1 .5. The asymptotic expansion of the integral I;:
J( �
:c - t)a - l ln" (:c - t)cp(t)dt ,
0<
a < 1,
-1
< < +oo, 11
0
which may have complex values, the integral
f( �
:c - wr - l l ln(:c - t)l" cp(t)dt
0
must be considered. Notes to § 22.1 and 22.2. Fractional calculus from the very first was considered in the complex plane. It is sufficient to refer, for example, to the papers by Liouville [1]-[8] ( 1832-1837) with the starting definition of fractional differentiation of functions representable by series of exponential functions, or by Griinwald [1] (1867), Letnikov (1] (1868) and Sonine [2] (1872). The approach connected with the name of Hadamard goes back to his paper [1] (1892). Weyl fractional differentiation (22.1) (approach II) in the complex plane first appeared in Hardy and Littlewood (5] (1932) . Approach III, i.e. Riemann-Liouville fractional integro differentiation (22.2)-(22.3) with the integration along the rectilinear interval (zo, z], can be found in the first papers on fractional calculus. Relation (22.1 1 ) is already contained in the paper by Holmgren [1 , p.1] (1865-1866) . Griinwald defined fractional integr�differentiation via fractional differences (see Section 20) in the complex plane and showed the reducibility of this definition to that of Riemann-Liouville. Riemann-Liouville fractional integro-differentiation with the integration along a curve in the complex plane was investigated in detail by Sewell [1] (1935), [2] (1937) in connection with questions of polynomial approximation in the complex plane - see § 23.2 (note 22.1). As for approach IV , we note that the generalized Cauchy formula (22.4) appeared first in the paper by Sonine [2] (1872) who in particular proved the coincidence (22.32) of Cauchy fractional derivative with the fractional integral I;;,a in the case a < 0. This formula was treated later by Laurent (1] (1884), Nekrasov [1 , p.87) (1888) and Krug [1] (1890), and was effectively used by
[ ( e:�l ) P
with a (e�" - 1) = D� non-integer •· The Cauchy-Sonine approach was used by Montel [1 , p.167] {1914) and Hardy and Littlewood (5] (1932). Relation {22.4) was used in Blumenthal [1 , p.490] (1931), where fractional integration was treated from the point of view of composition theory developed by Volterra. Construction (22.30) was firstly given by Letnikov [3, p.428) (1872). Fractional integro-differentiation as given in (22.17), (22.18) and (22.21 ) was apparently not considered elsewhere except for the cases I+.,-, , 'D+ -w and I+ o• 'D + o which can be found in , , , the papers by Nishimoto [1]-[5] , (7] and others (1976-1984), see also Owa and Nishimoto (1] ( 1982). Theorem 22.2 is due to Hardy and Littlewood [5) (1932), [7] (1941) . Notes to § 22.3. The representation of the fractional integral I� in the form (22.34) was used by Hadamard [1] (1892). This served to him together with the integrals (18.44) as the Sintsov [1] (1891 ), to study Bernoullian functions
starting point to suggest consideration of more general constructions
1
] z =O
J V(t)f(zt)dt.
However, 0 this idea was not achieved by him in any completed form. The realization of this idea with sufficiently rich content was given by Dzherbashyan [4] (1967), (5) (1968).
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
436
The generalized integro-differentiation of Gel'fond-Leont'ev goes back to the paper by Gel'fond and Leont'ev [1] (1951 ) . There is a wide literature containing generalizations and development of ideas connected with this theory. We refer in this connection to the papen by Korobeinik [1], [2] {1964), [3] (1965), [4] {1983), where the idea of generalized integro differentiation of analytic functions was developed in the most general form. Korobeinik [4) also introduced and investigated generalized differentiation and integration operators f>e and Je defined on an arbitrary number set C = {Ca } a eM• where M is not necessarily a countable set. We note the paper by Nagnibida [1] (1966) , which contains the investigation of certain questions connected with Gel'fond-Leont'ev operators. The operator {22.41 ) was noted as an example in Gel'fond and Leont'ev [1] {1951) . Its representation in the form {22.42) was given in Dimovaki [1] (1981), see also [3, p.105] (1982). A construction close in a sense to (22.43) can be found in Dimovski [2], [3, p.106] {1982). The passage from the Hadamard composition (22.46) to the convolution (22.48) is well known, as for example, the book by Smimov and Lebedev [1 , p.169). The integral operaton (22.48) in a more general situation were investigated by Korobeinik [1]-[2] (1964) , [3] {1965), see § 23.2 (note 22.18). In the examples 1-3 after Lemma 22.4 we follow the paper by Belyi [6] {1977), where the generalized differentiation in (22.46) was considered in connection with integral representations for functions analytic in an annulus - see also Belinskii and Belyi [1] (1971) . The variant (22.55) can be also found in Owa [3) {1981 ), [6] (1982), [13) {1985). The generalized integro-differentiation given in (22.57) was introduced and used in some problem of analytic function theory in the papers by Dzherbashyan [4) (1967), [5) {1968). -
23.2. Survey of other results (relating to § § 18-22) 18.1. Let I0a+ ,·., , , and transform { 1 .1 12) . H J E
I�, , be the operators {18.1) and (18.7) and let rot be the Lp(O, oo), 1 � p � 2, then Ig+ ;o , , f, I�,o ,, f E Lp(O, oo) and 0 ,
a o , J)(s) = r{1 + +11 - s/u) (rotJ)(s), (rotio+· r( 1 + f1 a - s /u ) •
•
r( + s/u) (rot!� , D,fl J)(s) = q, +'7 a + s/u) (rol! )(s),
for s =
1/p + iT, -oo < T < oo.
H2
Re (f1 - s/u) Re (f1 + s/u)
> -1,
> 0.
Mellin
{23.1) (23.2)
< p < oo and
J E rotp = {g : g = !)Jt- 1 'P, 'P E Lpt (up- 1 - ioo, up- 1 + ioo), 1/p + 1 /p1 = 1}, then Ig+ ;o, , f, I�, o,, f E rotp and {23.1) and {23.2) hold (Erdelyi [6, Lemma 5]). In the case
q = 1 these statements for the operators {18.5) and (18.6) were proved first by Kober [1, Theorems Sa and 5b). Rooney [4) studied mapping properties of the operators Ig+ ;o ,, and I� ,D, fl considered on the weighted space Lp (R�; zP), 1 � p < oo; see also § 9.2 (note 5.6). let !m, L, L-1 be the operators of the Mellin transform {1 .1 12) and Laplace transforms (1 .119) and {1 .120), and let It', a and K;;, a be Kober operators (18 . 5) and (18.6) . Let also
a > 0,
11
> 0; j(z), z - 1 / 2 f(z) E L (O, oo); f * (s) = rot{ J(t); s} E L(1/2 - ioo, 1 /2 + ioo) ;
z - l / 2 (K;;, a ! )(z) E L(O, oo) . Then the representations (It',a ! )(z) = z- a-'1 L-1 {ca L[T" j( T) ; t]; z} ,
and z - 1 / 2 (It', a f)( z ),
(K;;,a ! )(z) = {y 1- a-f1 L- l { r a L[T'I -1 f(1/T) i t) ; y} }y =�-t
§
23.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER
4
437
( x [7]).[2] (18.5) (18.6) , 11 (z) wp, 11 (zt)j(t)dt, wp J(zt) z 1 1 2 J .,. - 1 JII (-r)Jp(z/-r)d-r 'Y 0 0 J11(z) (1. 83 ). RJ(x) z- 1 / (z - 1 ) Re v, ( v 2a ) #; -2, -4, .. Ta = (1II+1 2,a )-1 RIII+1 2,a Rea > 0, Ta (K11-1 2+ a , a )- 1 RKv-1 2 + a, v Rea -< 0. J E L2 (0, oo), Ta l E T�1 J = Ta f, To! = Rj, a-+� -}; Ta ( �) J0 Jv(2.;;i)j(t)dt J11(x) Sfl, :: S11 (1.83) (18.19) S11 S11 ,o. , a, 1 a (18.5) (18.6) > - 1/2,
are
valid Fo Srivastava showed that the compositions It ., a T..[,a and K;; ., a K; .. ,a of the Kober operators and may be represented as compositions of two operators of the form �
where
is the Bessel function Le t =
the case then
and
00
=
;
is the Watson fm1ction,
. , and let
+
Re
H
in the case
=
L2 (0, oo ) , and
lim
l
=
in
00
H
where is the Bessel function (Erdelyi [5]). be the modified Hankel transform and let 1 8.2. let = Re t7 the Kober operators and admit the following representations
(23.3) Kq,a = S2q +f3 ,/3S2q + a+f3 , a -f3
within the frames of the space L2 (0, oo) ( Kober d. Erdelyi and Kober established relations which connect Kober operators with the trm1cated Hankel transforms:
[1]), (18.22).
[1]
(18.5) (18.6) and
m Svf(x) J Jll,m (2.;;i)j(t)dt, J E Lp(O, oo), 1 p 2, 0 J11,m (z) A:�: (-1)k (z/2)"+1)21: , v/2 1/p' #; 0, - 1, -2, . .. , m J11,m[1](z) (18.5) (18.(1.6) 83)). �
�
=
= L..,
k!r( v + k +
Re
where is the truncated Bessel function (cf. Joshi used Kober operators and generalized Hankel transforms
�
+
to find connections between the following
J(zt)"J�[(xt)"']f(t)dt, 00
where
11.63])
Jr(x)
=
E A:!r(\-:1:IJk) ,
k:O
0
IJ
> 0,
is the Bessel-Maitland function (see Marichev
and indices .X may have different values.
[10,
438
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
(2]
Bhise applied Erdelyi-Kober operators to the investigation of certain properties of the integral transform
00
(K f)(x) =
I0 0241 2
(xt � i -m -( v +2m, 1 )/2 , m - i + ( v +1 )/2 ) f(t)dt v/2, v/2+
-v/2 , -v/2-2m
with the Mejer G-function in the kernel. This is known as the generalized Hankel tran•form. It reduces to Hankel transform in the case k + m = 1 8.3. Braaksma and Schuitman suggested a modification of the Erdelyi-Kober-type fractional integral alike the Enlelyi construction in
1/2.
(1]
(18.1)
(9.3):
(23.4) giving the analogous modification �� a 11 c.p of the operator I
I
(18.3)
with =
the operators IC-t,a ,fl and 7� , a , , were studied in the special spaces
T(.X, t£)
= { c.p E C 00 (0 , oo) :
n = 0,
1, 2,
• ..
j tc +p c.p(P ) (t) j ,
sup
t> O
An :s; c
; .Xn < 1-'n , .Xo > .\ 1 1-'0 < 1-' 1 <
...
,
>
nlim -oo t'n
...
,
= I'}
J.£ ) :
b + oo
T(.X,
p = 0,
.
1,2,
In the cited paper
. . . , n,
= nlim -oo .Xn .\;
8)
of test functions (different from those presented in Section as well as in the corresponding dual spaces �-'• of generalized functions. The relations of such modified fractional integrals with the modified Hankel transform m Sv f (see n. above) were also given. 18.4. More general than in and the operators
T'(1- 1 - .X)
(18.5) (18.6),18.2
x -")'- 1 r(a)
z
I0 2F1 (I - a,/3 + m; /3; t/x)t"Y f(t)dt, (Kf)(x) r�:) I 2 Fl (I - a, /3 + m; /3; x/t)t - 6 - 1 f(t)dt, (1.72) (18.18) (23.1 ) (23.[1]2) (9.6) (23. 5 ) (23. 6 ). L L- 1 (18.5) (18.6) (23.5)-(23.6) (Rf)(x) =
00
=
z
(23.5) (23.6)
with the Gauss hypergeometric function were introduced by Saxena (5] . He gave analogues of and for the Mellin transform and of for fractional integration by parts. Nieva del Pino found Vanna transform and Mejer and Hankel transforms (see § of the operators defined in and Representations of these operators via the Laplace operators and were given by Kumbhat and Saxena (1]. Generalizations of the ErdeJ.yi Kober operators and of the type with the Gauss hypergeometric
1.4)
439
§ 23. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 4
function in the kernel were also considered by Kalla and Saxena [1] and Saxena and Kwnbhat (1]. There are also generalizations with the Wright hypergeometric function in the kernel Malovichko (1]; with the Bessel function - Lowndes (1]; with the Meijer G-function - Parasha.r [1] and Kalla (6], [12] and Kiryakova [1], (2]; with the Fox H-function - Kalla (4), (12], Saxena and Kwnbhat (2], Goyal and Jain (1] ; Kiryakova (3] , Kalla and Kiryakova [1], and with an arbitrary function of a certain class - Kalla [7]. See also Section 35.1, 36, 37.2, 39.2. 18.5. Let be the space of test functions defined in § 8.4, let be the dual space and let
pFq
FpJ.I
FJ,,..
(23.7)
Rec a,b,E
2F1 (a,b;c;z) O+,e-brn:z;-rna 1O+,b rn:z;rna Ig FJ,,.. +�rnF; ,,..Ig++rn,e·rn
where m > 0, > 0, C, and is the Gauss hypergeometric function (1 .72). McBride [1] showed that the operator H� J is representable as f
e J( ) = Hrn :z;
J(:z; )
x > 0,
'
with the Erdelyi-Kober-type operator :: 0 given in (18.1 )-(18.2) , and is continuous ' int from into Fp,J.& - rne and from Similar investigations were carried out for three other operators which are obtained from H�J by interchanging xrn and trn in the function or by the same interchange in the whole kernel and replacing the interval of integration by oo ) , see also § 39.2 (note 36.2). Certain properties of the Erdelyi-Kober-type operators (18.1) and {18.4) with = 0 and b = oo in the spaces and were studied by McBride [2], (4]. Mapping properties of Hankel transforms (see § 1.4) and of modified Hankel transforms (18.19) with u = 2 from Fp,,.. , into respectively, were considered by McBride [5]. He also ·
Fp,..
F1 , (x, 2(O,x)
a
Fp,J.I FJ,,,.. FJ,,,.. Fp,2/p-J.& -l , F;,2/p-J.&-l ,
established various relationships between these transforms and the Erdelyi-Kober-type fractional integration operators (18.1) and (18.3) and, in particular, proved (18.20)-(18.23) with u = 2. We remark that operators of the type (23.7) with rn = 1 were earlier studied by Love (2], [3] in other function spaces Qq and Rr as in § 17.1 , Notes to § 10.1. An operator of the type H� J but with lower variable limit of integration was also considered by Higgins [3] - § 39.2 (notes 36.1-36.2). 1 8.6. Saigo [1]-[3] (and also [6], (7]) introduced the integral operators
z:
(1:/·" J)(x)
=
(1:/·" !)(x)
=
(I�!·" !)(x)
=
(x-;l�Ot-{J j(x-t)01 -1 2F1 (a + {3, ; = : ) f(t)dt, - + ( ddx ) n (I:jn ,{J -n ,f1 -n (b-;/:)Ot-{J jb (t-x)01-1 2 F1 ( {3, a; ; = :) f(t)dt, - + (- .!!._dx ) n (1b-01+n,{J -n,f1 -n J)(x), j (t -r�!;-l C01-IJ 2 F1 (a + {3, a ; - 7) f(t)dt,
Re o > 0,
-71; 01;
a
([01•b-/J ,'I J)(x) = (1�.'/J,'I J)(x) =
J)(x) ,
z:
Reo � 0,
01 +
n
= ( Reo)
1;
Re o > 0,
- 71;
Re o � 0,
n
= ( Reo]
1;
00
z:
- 71 ;
1
Rea > 0,
440
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
which reduce to Riemann-Liouville or Kober fractional integrals and derivatives in the cases {J = -ex or {J = 0, respectively. Various properties of these operators were investigated in the cited papers. In particular, the paper by Saigo [1] contains composition representations of the type (10.18)-{10.29) for the operators and validity conditions for the formula
1�.'/J ,'I ,
F;f •"
J0 g(x)(F;f·" J)(x)dx J0 f(x)(l�.'p ,, g)(x)dx, 00
00
=
of integration by parts, and validity conditions for the following analogues of the semigroup property (2.65):
The first two of these relations remain true after replacing a+ by b- . Mapping properties of the operators and in the spaces Lp((O, oo}; x'Y), 1 � p � oo, were also investigated in this paper. Saigo [2), [3), [6], [7] also showed that the above equations yield the following expressions for the inverse operators:
r;f •"
Ic:_•P,'I
and studied Holder properties of the functions and in the case E H.\ ([a, b)), 0 < ,\ < 1. The isomorphism between the weighted Holder spaces realized by these operators was obtained by Grin'ko and Kilbas [1]; see § 17.2 (note 10.1). Srivastava and Saigo [1] considered the multiplication of the operators and and applied their results to obtain the explicit solution of some boundary problems for the Euler-Poisson-Darboux equations in terms of Appel and Kampe de Feriet functions of two variables - § 43.2 (note 41.1). Saigo and Glaeske [1], [2] investigated mapping properties and product rules of the operators and in the spaces Fp,IJ - subsection 8.4. 18.7. Developing an idea of Erdelyi [3) , as in § 4 .2 (note 2.6) and § 9.2 (note 5.4), Akopyan and Nersesyan [1] used (18.18) of fractional integration by parts for Erdelyi-Kober operators with <1 = 2 to construct a new biorthogonal systems:
I:f·" f
I�!·" f
f(x)
r;f •"
I;f·"
1�,/J,'I
I:+; u,fl
\Pm (x) = J2 ( }r(1 v+l Jm,v "
d 2 2 -a l - v J . ) dx J (t - x ) t v (Jm,v t) dt 1
2
Ot
X
'
I{:!•�'
§ 23. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 4
441
where in , v , n = 1, 2, . . . , are the roots of the Bessel fnnctions and 0 � at < 1. In the case v = 1 /2 the generalized Schlomilch biorthogonal system is obtained from this system. 18.8 . Erdelyi-Kober operators were used by Klyuchantsev to obtain the transfonnation operator for the differential operators
J11 (z)
(x1-<7 d/dxY)t [1] Fr rr-1 + ···+ brr b d 1 .. Br = + --r dx x dx -1 x FrFr Fr-1 BrFr = dr /dxr . v r- 1 d1-dx ) v, Frv = II= xa" ( -r x k1 b1 • , br . k k [1] z (X�P)(x) = J K(x, t)�P(t)dt, ('Xc,o)(x) f K(t, x)A(t)�P(t)dt ,; 0 K(x, t). X{l.s J = Alz) /z (A(x)/z) - q(x). ] ICL(p:q' +·l )•. = x-a-• rc+x" 1 C:.1�• = x• I�x-a-• a 1 •" II L p q <- r ( 8 + lil0+a ;1 ,• IIL(p ,q) <- f(af(8++8 + Ili-; ( , ) f(a + + 1/p) p< � 8 /p 8 - /p /(xt) Mk,m (z) 0 -m - 1/2 e-zt/ 2 Mk,m (xt)/(t)dt IC+ ;<7,fl 1�;<7,'1 ((2] . ) -,
�
i.e. such an operator conditions, the operator
that has the fonn
r = 1 , 2, .
On fnnctions
,
satisfying certain parity
c ,.
the exponents a and c being determined by the coefficients ... The paper by Trimeche contains a generalization of the Erdelyi-Kober operators in the fonn
=
00
with a certain kernel This generalization serves as a transformation operator: !1XJ :: for the differential operator l1
Rooney (1 investigated mapping properties of the ErdtHyi-Kober-type operators and � (cf. {18.1) and {18.7)) in Lorentz spaces For the latter we refer t f r example, O 'Neil [1] . It was shown that
18.9.
1 - 1/p) 1 - 1/p) '
1/p)
if 1 � oo, q p, at > 0 and > -1 ' in the former case, and > 1 in the latter case . This was applied to study mapping properties of the Varma integral transfonn (9.6) and of the
integral transfonn
00
8
with the Whittaker fnnction
(Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi [1 , 6.9]) in the spaces L(p, q) . and 1 8.10. Let be the left- and right-hand sided Erdelyi-Kober operators 1 8 1 and (18.7). Their interconnections similar to those in (11 .27)-(11 .30) were given by Rooney in the fonn
H1 H2
Lp (R�,xP), Io\;<7,, [Lp(R�;x�')] I�;<7,fi [Lp(R�;x�')] Sp,.>.,-y (Lp(R�;x�')), Sp,.>. ,-y p,2s� .1 -p,2 , 1 (4].
where and are operators bonnded in the weighted spaces which was obtained by means of theorems on Fourie!'-multipliers. These interconnections were used in this paper to obtain imbedding theorems for the ranges into each and other or a theorem on their coincidence - Rooney (3). These results were applied to prove imbedding is a = S At1te-• where theorems for the ranges composition of two modified Hankel transforms (18.19) - Rooney
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
442
18.11. Fox [1] showed that the Erdelyi-Kober fractional integration conserves, under certain conditions, the so called chain property of integral transfonns.
1 8.12. Hadamard fractional derivatives and integrals (18.42), (18.43) , (18.56) and (18.561) were used by Mamedov and Orudzhev [1], [2] to define certain spaces of functions on the half-axis with a fractional differentiability, which are well suited for the application of the Mellin transform. 1 8.13. Let l(x) E
L2(R� , Pa ), where Pa (x) = e -�x01, 01 � 0, and let l(x) = E enL�a)(x), n=O 2 a where L� ) (x) = [r(n+ Ot+ 1)/r(n+ 1)] - 1 / L�01)(x) is the nonnalized Laguerre polynomial system (see § 9.2, note 5.4). In order that
I ( x) is representable as
00
11
L c� n <
n=O
oo,
0
J� e�-t(t - x)11- 1 �P(t)dt,
< 11 <
1, it is necessary and sufficient that
00
l(x) = ( Rafal'son [1]).
�P(t) E L2(R�,p01+ 11 )
18.14. Chen fractional differentiation given in (18.87) was applied by Skorikov [2] to the characterization of the space Lp([a, b]) = H a •P((a, b]) of Bessel potentials on an interval, - oo � a < b � oo. The original definition of the space Lp([a, b]) in this paper was given in terms of Chen fractional differentiation. This definition in the case 0 < 01 < 1, 1 < p < 1/0t has the form
L�([a, b]) = {/ : J E Lp ,
Lp }, (23.8 } where D� I is the Chen-Marchand derivative (18.91}-(18.93}, a � c � b. It was shown that this definition does not depend on the choice of the point c and that Lp ([a, b]) coincides with the space of restrictions of Bessel potentials on the whole line onto (a, b]. These assertions develop Theorem 18.3, which corresponds to the case c = a or c = b. In the case p > 1/0t (23.8) was modified in [2] by taking into account the continuity of the functions in Lp in this case. A generalization of the semigroup property (18.86) for Chen fractional integration (18.80) to the case of different "initial" points was given by Nahushev and Salahitdinov (1]. Let a ,fJ - sign (x - c)lx - ciOt -1
Ic,d !p -
r(0t)r(1 + {3)
In particular, it was shown in
f� (
if 01 > 0 and {3 > 0, the composition
.
I
· t - d lsign (�- c) ) �P(t)dt. x d
F 1 - 01, 1, 1 + {3,
a
[1] that
Dg J E
_
I� -lz I� being also considered.
18.15. In a number of papers, Al-Salam (1], (2], Al-Salam and Verma (1], Agarwal [2], [3] and Sharma [1] and Upadhyay (1] some objects referred to as q-integrals and q-derivatives were introduced and investigated. We note that their definition, which does not contain the passage to a limit is not a definition of integrals and derivatives in the usual sense, but is an extension to fractional exponents of the idea of the q-derivative, namely, (Vq/}(x) = which goes back to Jackson [1] and (2], and plays an important role in combinatorial analysis. Such constructions of fractional order were first introduced by Al-Salam (1], [2] in the form
/(:��{�J�)
§ 23. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 4
443
J)(x) q-11(11+ 1 )/2x" _ q)" 2:<0 _ 1)k [-:] qk(k-1 )/2J(xq-11-k ), 1:= q \ qo [ ] (a] [cr[-1]1[]2.]. . [.cr[k]-k+1] also also , ( qi:"
00
(1
=
<
- oo
11
<
oo,
0<
< 1,
. . and (a] = _9 • There are other 10rms of fract1onal q-mtegrals r wbere cr 1c = and q-derivatives given in Al-Salam [1] and Agarwal [2], (3], where some applications of these ideas were given. Reference may be made to Khan [1] and Khan and Khan (1] . The book by Exton [1] where "q-theory" can be found in detail is also relevant. ..
1 8.16. Fractional differentiation was extended to the case of functions on a local field K (Onneweer [1]-[3]). Within the framework of the spaces Lp (K ) , p � 1, strong fractional derivatives were defined similar to the Riesz derivatives corresponding to the case when K is a real line, and the coJTesponding spaces of Bessel-type potentials were in particular studied. The relationship between these spaces and Lipshitz-Taibleson-type spaces over K can also be noted.
f x) E X2• has X21r 19.1 . Let
(
and
a
be the same as in Theorem 19.2. We say that a 21r-periodic function a •trong Weyl fractional derivative in X2 1r if there exist a function cp(x)
sequence of trigonometrical polynomials
Tn (x) 1: =L:n-n an ,k eikx 'D � ) =
cr f is the strong Weyl derivative.
llcp - T�cr) II X:a - 0 as n - oo. Then by definition cp = ..
Here T cr) =
�
n (ik)aan,keikx L: lc= -n
such that II/ -
is the Weyl fractional derivative of a polynomial
following theorem is valid - Malozemov [1]-(4].
Theorem 23. 1. The eri•tence of a •trong fractional Weyl derivative• in i• eq•ivalent to it. re p re•entability by the Weyl fractional integral: /(x) cp a > 0.
E XE2X"''21r
E X21r Tn l x2.. ,
X21r f(x)
Tn (x).
The
of a function = /o + I ) c,o,
f
Comparing this theorem with Theorem 19.2 we see that the existence of a strong Weyl derivative in is equivalent to the convergence of the truncated Marchaud derivative in
X21r
X21r ·
19.2. The following is close in a sense to Theorems 19.3 and 19.2 (with Remark 19.2) which characterize functions representable by the fractional integral of a function in Lp. Let a > 0 and let m be the least integer such that m � a. Katsaras and Liu [1] introduced a modification (d. (19.17)) of the Weyl fractional derivative in the form
f(x)
(cr) / = li m D+ h , -o
f f(x+h) - J(x),
h-1 1 h-1 ···
m L.l. h 1 A
• ••
A
L.l. h ...
1(m - cr) /'
( ) 23.9
J ( ) n) ln In·
where .6h = .6h1 • • • .6h,. f = .6h1 (.6h2 • • • .6h,. /) and f(m - cr) is the fractional integral (19.26)-(19.27). They proved that a function E Lp has the limit 23 .9 in Lp , 1 � p < oo , if and only if there exists a function Lp such that = ( isign m l cr
J O n
g(x) E
19.3 . The following statement (Kudryavtsev [1]) generalizes the Szasz theorem known in the theory of Fourier series - Bari [1, p 647] .
Theorem 23.2. Let eriab a f•nction cp =
f(x) E L1 ('D�) E Lp
.
(0, 211") and let
/)
'D�a) f E Lp(O, 211")
with Fourier coefficient.
exi•t in the aenae that there 1 � p < 2, a > 0. = i n cr
C,On ( ) fn ,
444
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Then for any -y > (a + 1 - 1/p) -1 the e•timate6 00
E
n= - oo
lfn i"Y
<
oo,
00
E
lni=N+ 1
lfn i"Y = o( N1-"Y(1 + a-1 /p ) )
(23.10)
are valid. 1 9.4. Kudryavtsev [1] introduced a generalization of Weyl fractional integra-differentiation, defined by the expansion
v a ,{J J E
00
E
n= - oo
( in) a ln{J ln l ein x
and called it a fractional-logarithmic derivative of order (a, P) . The statement, extending that of theorem 23.2 to D ,pf and proved in [1], is as follows: if Da , {J f E Lp under assumptions of a Theorem 23.2, then instead of (23.10) we have 00
L
lni=N + 1
lin p = o(N 1-"Y(a+ 1 -1 /p ) ln -fJ"Y N) .
1 9.5. In Esmaganbetov, Nauryzbaev and Smailov (1] theorems were proved which connect
�
the existence in Lp of a Weyl fractional derivative V a) J of a periodic function f(x) with the behaviour of Lp -norms of fractional derivatives of partial sums of Fourier series. The estimates
were, in particular, proved, where a � 0, r > 0, -y = min (r, p) and so on. 1 9.6. We referred to the application of methods of approximation theory in questions of fractional calculus in § 17.2, note 14.16. In the periodic case we have to cite the fundamental investigations by Favard [1] , Nagy [1], Nikol'skii (2], [4], Kralik (1], Ogievetskii [1], [2], [5] and
�
Timan [2]. In particular, the estimate En (I a) f) � cn -a wk ( f, 1/n) was proved by Nagy (1], Nikol'skii (4] and Timan [2] showed En ( ! ) as being the best approximation of f in Lp by trigonometric polynomials, and wk (f, 1 /n) as being the continuity modulus in Lp , 1 � p � oo of order k. We may add the papers by Xie Ting-fan [1], Nessel and Trebels [1), Taberski [1]-[4], (6], Butzer, Dyckhoff, Gorlich and Stens [1] and Esmaganbetov (1], (3], and also Butzer and Nessel [1 , Ch. 1 1]. There are very many papers devoted to various problems of approximation of fractionally differentiable periodic functions by all manner of trigonometric sums, such as Pinkevich (1], Nikol'skii (1]-[3] , Timan [1], Dzyadyk [1], Izumi and Sato (1], Stechkin [2], Efimov (1]-(4], Sune Yun-Shen (1], Telyakovskii [1], [2], Pokalo [1] , Rusak [1)-[3], Zhuk [1], Stepanets [1], [2] and others; there are also references in these papers. In Babenko, V .F. (1] the Kolmogorov diameters were estimated for spaces of periodic functions representable by fractional integrals /�a ) !/', !p E L 1 or !I' E L oo . 1 9.7. The assertion (19.62) of the Hardy-Littlewood theorem becomes false in the case p = 1 . It has to be replaced by the following result. H 0 < a < 1 , q = 1/(1 - a), then
II I�a ) li'IILq ( 0, 2 11' )
2 11'
�A
J IJ (x)l(ln+ IJ(x)l) 1-a dx 0
+ A,
§
23.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 4
at IJ(x)I(In+ I J(x)l)6dx < > f(x) E cosnx. Izumi [1]
the constant A depending on 2r the case when J 0
1 9.8. Let
"-�
00
n =1
445
only - Zygmund [1). This result was generalized by O 'Neil oo, s
an
[3]
to
0. gave various sufficient conditions on coefficients
J(t - x)a-l f(t)dt at 1 n=L1 n-a 0 < at < 1. [1] l)(a) J 4a!f:> , g(x)f(x) = (f(m -a) J)(x), - < at < (t) o(ltlm ). f(x + t) - z (t) O(ltlm +fl) f(x). J (x), [ 1 ], [2). K:(x,() K:�a) (x,() at > 0 r
an such that the existence of the finite limit lim � -o convergence of the series
00
an ,
would guarantee the
�
In the case
conditions of convergence were given by Matsuyama
=
necessary and sufficient
in close terms.
= 19.9. The expression m 1 m, for the Weyl fractional derivative of a periodic function may be modified by treating differentiation in the Peano sense. This implies the existence of a polynomial P� such that Fractional derivatives modified in such a way were considered by + t Pz = Zygmund who investigated the connection of the property = P with fractional differentiability of the function For the non-periodic case we refer t o Stein which have and Zygmund The development of the ideas of these papers to functions lacunary Fourier series, was made by Weiland while extension to the case of many variables can be found in Wetland
m g(x(dg/dx)) - (3], (t) (1].
19.10. Let a kernel with respect to and
x
Hille and Tamarkin
(2]
have the Weyl fractional derivative
showed that the characteristic values
y(x)- ). f K:(x, e)y(e)de l..\n ln-a-1+ 1/P - n n=E1 � ([1], na . 2r
= 0,
0
satisfy the condition
19.1 1. Let !(8)
x E [0, 1r).
oo as
"-�
00
0
of order
..\n of the integral equation
< < 211", X
oo.
an P (cos 8) be the ultraspherical expansion of a function
la f
f(x),
Muckenhoupt and Stein p.75) introduced the fractional integration which reduced to division of an by Thus it matches well to ultraspherical expansions as the Weyl operator does to the usual Fourier expansions. This fractional integration was realized in terms of the convolution structure for ultraspherical expansions. They proved a Hardy-Littlewood-type theorem on mapping property of this operator from into with = + and the norm in Lp with respect to the measure = sin 8 1 2 8 Later, Bavinck considered a more general case of Fourier-Jacobi expansions. Along with a statement of the above type he also gave theorems on mapping of his fractional integration operator within the framework of Lipshitz spaces Lip (T, p) under the appropriate definition of the latter. This is an extension of Theorem 19.12. For periodic (unctions Alexitz and Kralik considered generalized fractional integration of the type with an arbitrary function such that the integral
(1] 1) ldm.>.BI Lp l Lr>. d . 1/r 1/p-at/(2..\
19.9.
1 A(x) d: 00
J
L
A{k)fk eib (1], (2]
(1]
A(k)
converges, and they gave applications to some approximation theorems.
investigations by Stepanets
are also relevant.
Recent
He gave the classification of periodic
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
446
functions with respect to such a generalized differentiability, with applications to approximation theory problems. 20.1. The definition (20.7) of fractional differentiation is naturally extended to the case of fractional powers of operators. For the concept of infinitesimal operators we refer to § 5.7. The idea of constructing fractional powers of operators via fractional differences is due to Butzer and it was realized by Westphal 4 . Let Tt , A and X be the same as in § 5.7. Let us introduce the fractional power ( -A)a, a > 0, by the relation
[]
(23.1 1) where (E - Tt )a f =
00
L ( - 1)k (i) Tit similar to (20.2), and where the limit is in the nonn of the
k=O space X. The following theorem is valid - Westphal 4 .
[]
Theorem 23.3. The domain D((-A)a) of the op era.tor ( - A)a i• tlen•e in X antl D((-A)a) C D((-A).8 ) if a > {J > 0 antl ( - A)a i• a clo•etl o perator. The following theorem due to Westphal 3 , and see also § 23.1 , notes to § 20.3, adjoins in a sense to Theorem 20.4.
[]
Theorem 23 .4. For f E X the limit (23.11 ) ezi.t• in X if antl only if there exi•t. the limit -1- lim x( a , l) e-o
00
j ,-a-1 (E - Tt )1
fdt,
l
> a,
in X and both limit. coincide - •ee the val•e of x(a, l) in (5.81). The idea of fractional differentiation by Griinwald and Letnikov allows another wide reaching generalization. Replacing the translation operator Th in (Ah f)(x) = (E - Th ) a f by one or another generalized translation operator one can obtain various forms of fractional differentiation. This idea was realized by Butzer and Stens with (Th f)(x) = (1/2)[f(xh + V(1 +
[1]-[3] f(xh - V x2 )(1 -h2 ))], < x < < h < (AJ:f)(x) , (A/:f)(x) (-1)[a] E v( a) (1 -
-1
1, -1
x2 )(1 - h2 ))
1 which corresponds to the fractional
derivative
f=
00
lim h - 1 -0 (1 -
=
h) a
j :O
(-1 )-i (
�) (� J)(x) 3
called the Chebyshev derivative in these papers. The limit here is taken in the nonn of the space X = C or X = Lp with weight (1 In particular, 1) ( 1) f = (1 f ' ( ) and
1){ 1/2)
f=
x2) - 1/2 .
x2 )f"(x) - x x
- ...;t::;2-Jz (Hf)(x) where Hf is the Hilbert singular operator defined in (19.22).
(x)
x
FUnctions f E X, which have fractional derivatives ( 1)( a) f)( ), were characterized as those and only those functions which are representable by the "fractional integral" f =
(1/11") Here
1 J (Tx f)(t)
-1
1 -1
2 12
dt and
..Pa (x)
is
such a function that
2 - 1 12
f(k) = (1/?r) J f(t) cos(k arccos t)(1 - t )
dt
are
tba (k)
=
(-1)[a]k- 2 a.
Fourier-Chebyshev coefficients.
20.2. A relationship between Griinwald-Letnikov and Riemann-Liouville fractional differentiability is given by the following theorem (Westphal [3]), where X = Lp (R� ), 1 � p < oo , or X = Co , the latter being the space of bounded unifonnly continuous functions f(x) o n R� with f(O) = 0.
§ 23. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 4
f(x)
447
Theorem 23.5. Let E X and ex > 0. Then the following 1 tatemenb are equivalent to each oth er: i ) The Grinwald-Letnikov derivative exi1t1 in X : lim
h-0+ l h-cx ah f- f�a) l x :o ; = (ex] vg+ f
ii) E X. E AC1oc . k = 1, . . . , n, wh ere n , and 20.3. An interesting way of introducing "differences of fractional order" was suggested by Bosanquet 4 , p.240] :
-£,;{l�:l -af)(x) O, ( a�a) f(x) �fcx f(h- t) a-l cvg+ f)(x t)dt a�a) f(x)/ha -+ (Vg+ f)(x) as h -+ (3, ] g(x) J eixtdw(t), w(t) h
+
0
so
that 0. 20.4. The following is a generalization of the Bernstein-type inequality ( 19.74 ) , and is due
to Lizorkin
p.l18 . Let
=
a
where
has a bounded variation in
-a
Then the fractional derivative
(-u,u].
a
g(a)(x) J ( x)a i t dw(t), l u(a) I P a a lluiiP • i
=
ex
ex � 1 ,
-a
of a function allows the estimate � 1 � p � oo . 20.5. The following inequality for the Weyl fractional derivative of a trigonometric polynomial given by the following
g(x) Tn (x)
0
[3]),
211" , n
(Taberski generalizing the Stechkin-Nikol'skii inequality, and the inequality for the Griinwald Letnikov fractional derivative for an entire function of exponential type namely
G(x) I G(a)I IP ua (2 sin(uh/2)]-a l a i:GI p , �
h f [1], [2]
(Wilmes a
O'a ,
h 21r!u
o< <
and Taberski [5, p.133]) both adjoint the Bernstein-type inequality ( 19.74) . Here is a "centered" fractional difference. 20.6. For the generalized differentiation f by Post ( see (20.10 )) the generalized Leibniz
a('D)
rule
a('D)[u(x)v(x)] [2,
00
=
I: � u( k ) (x)a(k ) ('D)v(x)
k:O
a(x) xa .
is true - Post p.755] . It yields, in particular, the Leibniz formula ( 15.11 ) in the case = 20.7. Differences of fractional order are naturally used to define continuity moduli of fractional order; thus = = sup where X is a Banach space. ltl < h Properties of such continuity moduli were investigated in the papers by Butzer, Dyckhoff, Gorlich and Stens Taberski 8 , Gaimnazarov (1 ] , Esmaganbetov and V .G . Ponomarenko One may also see some modified (averaged) differences of fractional order in Drianov Most of the cited papers dealt with the methods of best approximation theory. Samko and Yalrubov considered the generalized Holder space defined by the fractional =
[1],[1]-[3][2.). [1], [3]
wa (f,h) wa,x (f, h) l af fl x . (3], ( ] (2], (2] Hcp,a H'f•a
CHAPTER 4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
448
continuity modulus: sup wa (f, S)/r.p( S) 6>0
H"' •01 = {f(x) : f(x) E X,
< oo }
Lp(O, 21r), 1 � p < oo, or X = C(O, 21r). It was shown that H'P•01 = HVJ ,tl for r.p(S ) E 41� (see (13.68)) if {3 � at > 0. The case r.p( S) = s>. was proved earlier by Butzer, Dychkoff, Gorlich and Stens [1]. One should see also the space H'P•01 in the multidimensional case in Samko and Ya.kubov [4). where X
=
One can consider more general continuity moduli in correspondence with Post's ideas Far reaching generalizations of the continuity modulus can be found in the papen by Boman It], Boman and Shapiro [1] and Shapiro [1, p.219) . 20.8. Taberski [7) introduced a modification 1 01 J = 41 01 * J of fractional integration and considered its connection with Griinwald-Letnikov differentiation. The kernel 41 01 (x), x E R 1 , of
(20.11).
00
* J r.p01 (t)eiztdt, where r.p01 (t) = (-it)01 Pa (t) and · oo P01 (t) is a non-negative even function such that Pa (t) :: 1 if t � c > 0, Pfw(t) � 0 for all t � 0, Pa (t) = O(t01+ 2 ), Pfw(t) = O(t01 + 1 ) and P:;(t) = O(t01 ) as t - + O. See also Tabenki [8). 20.9. Lubich [2) considered an approximation of the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral
this modification was defined as 41 01 (x) =
-
(I�+ J )(x) by the following discrete convolution sum
n
'
j=O
j=O
(Ih J)(x) = h 01 L Wn -; f(ih) + h01 L wn ,; f (ih), x = nh, with fixed s . This can be regarded as a development of ideas connected with the Griinwald Letnikov approach. Let f(x) = x.8 - 1g(x), {3 > 0, with g smooth. Given the convolution weights wn-j and p a positive integer, "starting" weights Wnj are shown to exit such that (Ih J)(x) - (I�+ f)(x) = O(hP ) , provided that certain assumptions, connecting w; , {3, a and p hold. 21.1. Kilbas [9] proved the generalized Holder property for certain multidimensional potential type integrals over a bounded domain in the Euclidean space Rn which contained integrals with power-logarithmic kernels as particular cases. 21.2. Riekstyn'sh [1) demonstrated the possibility of obtaining an asymptotic expansion as x - +oo of the convolution integral (17.1) and of generalizing the fractional integral (16.1) by a modified method of successive expansions provided that the functions .1"(t) and f(t) in (17.1) have a power-logarithmic asymptotic expansions as t - +oo. The reader may find other methods of obtaining asymptotic expansions for integrals of the form (17.1) and (17.2) in this case in Rielcstyn'sh [2]. 22.1. Fractional integro-differentiation in the complex plane may be considered in the case when functions, which are not necessarily analytic, are given on a certain curve only. Certain properties of fractional integra-differentiation in such a setting, such as existence, index laws and Taylor-type expansions (see § 4.2, note 2.8), were considered by Fabian [1]. An investigation in the situation of fractional integro-differentiation (22.2}-(22.3) with integration along a curve, on which a function is given was carried out by Sewell [1) , [2) in connection with function theory problems. In particular, he singled out a class of rectifiable curves over which the fractional integral of f(z) :: 1 converged absolutely uniformly in z. For curves of this class the following results were obtained: a) the lower derivatives (V.B J)(z) in the case when (V01 J)(x) exist, for {3 < a; b) the semigroup property holds; c) invariance of fractional differentiability under conformal mappings is valid. (We note, however, that Sewell's arguments implicitly contain the concept of a derivative of a function by another function - § 18.3; d) the Hardy-Littlewood theorems, similar to Lemma 13.1, on the existence of a fractional derivative V01 J on the curve for functions f(z) satisfying Holder condition on this curve of order .\ > a; e) the Bernstein-type inequality I PAa) (z) l � An01
§ 23. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 4
449
z Pn (z)
beyond the integration "starting point" o , being a polynomial. As well as this some other theorems connected with polynomial approximation in the complex plane were obtained. A number of developments and generalizations of Sewell's results is contained in the papers by Belyi [1]-[6], Belyi and Volkov [1], where various applications of the fractional calculus to approximation theory in the complex plane can be found. The problem of the best approximation by linear polynomial methods of analytic functions, which have a bounded generalized derivative of the type (22.46) was treated by Dveirin [1]. In connection with the fractional calculus on curves we also refer to Fabian [2], where the fractional integral (derivative) was considered along a curve L starting from the point and going to infinity, with 0t being any complex number. The behaviour of as along the e, was studied provided that z-11 f(z) - A = const as along the e. The results obtained were applied in [2] to the s ation of series and integrals. Other papers by Fabian [4], [5) are concerned with the character of the branching of the derivative taken along a similar e, at the point zo and at the points where singularities are admitted for
zoz - oo curv f(z).
(1>�0f)(z)
curv curv
umm
z0 z-1'(1>�0/){z), z - oo 1>�0 J
A paper by Peschanskii [2] has appeared recently. It gives a new version of fractional calculus in the case of functions given on a closed smooth curve r. The author introduced Marchaud type fractional differentiation of such functions in the form
Da ! = Dt J + D; j, where 0 < < 1, v;, = lim v�± J and e-o
J = f(t) , t E r (3 0) ,
Ot
1 vae+ J = 21ri
__
dr J (1f(r)- t/r)- tf(t) l+ a r 2
r�< '>
v�- 1 = � 21r1
(cf. (22.52)), re(t)
E
is a part of arc
J(r) - J( t) dr 1 - T ft) + cx t
r which remains after removing the arc (t(a - e), t(a + e)) with
parameter. The corresponding fractional integration Fa !() = F� !fJ
_
Fa !fJ =
(cf.
j (1
r� <'>
t(a) = t r, a being the was defined via
T
1 ( -. 21r& J �1 1, 1 ; 1 r
)
(r) dr t !fJ t
T
+ a; -
(22.54)). The main result in Peschanskii [2] states that J = Fa !() with !() E Lp(f), 1 p < oo, if and only if Lp(f) and converge in Lp(f) as e - +O, under the appropriate choice of branches in all the integrals. These conditions being satisfied, then !fJ = Da f . Finally we that a situation with fractional integration along a curve has already oc d above once (see § 17.2, note 12.5). 22.2. Carle [2, p.42-47) proved the following theorem. Given a function E A in not faster than IA I'Y for some 'Y > 0, there exist functions such that J
JE
curre
0
D�±
recall man I J(x)ldx creases
<
f(x), x
R1 ,
f+ (z)
·
450 and
CHAPTER
4.
OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
1- (z) analytic in the upper and lower half-planes c+ z:"
lim
Y-+ 0
E
c_ , respectively, such that
and
x"
J [f+ (x + iy) - f- (x - iy )]dx = J f(x)dx
z:l
z: '
in [a, b] whatever interval [a, b] is chosen. The result on the uniqueness of the functions f± ( z) was given by Carleman in terms of fractional integrals. Namely, he proved the uniqueness of the functions f±(z) up to polynomials in the class of functions satisfying the condition
unifonnly
11 x ,x 1
sup z eC:
E
I
( 1,?0 /± )(z) (z - zo)a(z - zo)P
I<
oo
2: 0, {3 2: 0 and zo C±, under the respective choice of signs. 22.3. Let j (a) ( z) = L (ik) a fl:z k be the Weyl fractional differentiation of a
with at
f(z) =
00
k =l
00
function
L f�:z" analytic in the unit disc. Hardy and Littlewood [7, p.232] proved the estimate
k:O
as well as a similar estimate for the fractional differentiation 1J0 J of the factor the right-hand side in this case. Flett [5] used the following modification of Weyl fractional integration:
m a l = � fk z k ' :Q L....J ka k= l 00
r-a
arising on
0 = 0,
J
its version
{23.12) being treated in Flett
!}30'
[6]-[8]. These operators have the representation -
_1_
z
J0
i.e. they are Hadamard-type constructions
_
_
z
J0 On(z/t)] l-a '
(18.42). We note, in particular, the estimate
I ( !B a J)(r ei8)1 � Ar(1 - r)- a �(O) ,
0�
r < 1,
sup 1 / (z)l and S11 (0) is the part of the unit disc bounded z eS.,( 8 ) by the two tangents from the point ei8 to the circle with center 0 and radius 'fl, wi th the longer
obtained in Flett
[5], where �(0) =
arc of this circle between
the points of contact.
23. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 4 In Flett [7, Theorem 6] one may find mapping properties of the operator J a in the spaces Bp ,q, r defined by the norm §
I IJa cpllp ,q,")' -a cllcpllp ,q,")' 22.2 Hq , 'YP/h - a), 1/p,
<
One of Flett's results is the estimate � with 0 � oo, 0 q � oo and 0. A specification of the Hardy-Littlewood Theorem for the operator considered as an operator from 0 q = under the additional assumption that oo into = 0 'Y � was given by Kim Hong Oh A certain development of some results of the latter paper can be found in Kim Yong Chan In Kim Hong Oh Theorem was extended to the case of functions of two variables, E C2 , � �
'Y
>a>
HP, < p < J(z) 0((1 - lzi) -"Y), < a < lw l 1.
22.2
Cohn
f (z, w)
[1] used the fractional differentiation (na J)(z) =
Ja
[1]. [1].
(z, w)
[2] l z l 1,
L (k + 1) a J,,z k , inverse to (23.12), 00
k=O
HP [1] (n a J)(z), a > J(z) ( �) 211' that J ICD a J)(r e i'P)IPdcp � c (1 - r)!- a if p > 1/2a, the power being replaced by log(1 r) - 1 0 if p = 1/2a. In this connection see also Ahern and Jevtic [1]. 22.4. Hardy and Littlewood [5] proved results similar to Theorems 14.6, 14.7 and 19.9 on fractional integro-differentiation in Lipshizian spaces of functions f (z) analytic in the unit disc l zl < 1 and satisfying the condition
-
to study properties of certain "star-invariant" subspaces of the spaces and BMO in the unit disc. Jevtic estimated such a fractional derivative 0, in the case of a function = exp known as atomic inner function in the unit disc. He showed in particular
-
( J 1/(rei('+h) ) - /(re'8JI'dB) 1 / 11'
p $
clh l\ p � 1.
-11'
[1]
< p < 1.
These results were extended by Gwilliam to the values 0 22.5. In the paper by Peka.rskii the following modification of the fractional derivative
[3]
('Dg J)(z):
. J (1t--1 -z/t)1[a)J(t)+a dt
j(a) (z) = r(1 + a) 271"1 was suggested (d.
= v 0a (z a -{a) f (z)].
{23.13)
lt i = P
22.33) and {22.52)) with a > 0 and lzl < p < 1. This modification corresponds to the expansion j(a )(z) = E r�(k���i)) f�cz k -(a) (cf. (22.36)). It has the advantage k=[a) in the theory of analytic functions that like operation za (vg J)(z) and operation {23.12), it maps analytic functions into analytic ones. This paper [3] contains Bernstein-type inequalities for the fractional derivatives (23.13) of rational functions. Investigations in [3] as well as in the papers [1], [2] of the same author, were connected with the approximation of analytic functions in Hardy-Besov spaces by rational functions. We note that in [2] fractional differentiation of the form {23.12) was used. 22.6. Let Ja (z) = L (ik) -a f�cz k be the Weyl fractional integral {22.1). A number of 00
k= 1
452
CHAPTER
papers - Hirshmann
4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
[1], Flett [2], [4] - dealt with the Littlewood-Paley-type functions
(-
)
Yk , a (O)
and some of their modifications. Estimates of the Lp 11", 11" norm of by the norm of J in the Hardy space Hp, p oo were given in particular. In this connection see also Sunouchi and Koizumi 22.7. Lavoie, Tremblay and Osler and also Lavoie, Osler and Tremblay treated fractional integro-differentiation of analytic functions of the form (In (5 = or c5 = with a power-logarithmic branching via a modification of the Cauchy integral formula This modification deals with integration along the "Pochhamem r loop" (z+, O+, , (see Fig. which aims to guarantee a unified form of definition of fractional integro-differentiation for all a . . . and {3 = For such a fractional integro-differentiation and {3 (except a = taken as a definition, the semigroup property and the Leibniz rule for uv ) were proved. The latter formula in the complex plane was earlier treated in detail in the papers by Osler with the initial definition of fractional integro-differentiation via As regards the Leibniz rule, we refer also to § note The reader can also find in Osler a number of representations for special functions in the complex plane (such as the hypergeometric, Bessel, Struve and others ) using elementary functions, or other special functions by means of fractional integrals. The case of hypergeometric functions and various of its particular cases may be seen also in Campos This case, as well as the case of hyperspheric functions, was in fact already known to Letnikov The representations for the Riemann-Gurwitz zeta-function can be found in the paper by Mikolas The role which the choice of an integration contour ( the "Prochhammer loop" ) plays in the case of functions having a branchpoint was also elucidated by Campos This author dealt with the Cauchy type formula using the Hankel contour £9 with 0 depending on 0 = arg and a number of his papers was based on this form of fractional integro-differentiation. In in particular it was shown that both the Liouville and Riemann approaches and are unified in the complex plane under the author's definition with the Hankel contour £9 , 0 = arg We also especially note where a useful concept of the so-called branch-operator was introduced. This concept arises, for example, if the order of integration in a composition of two integro-differentiation operators is interchanged so as to make one path go through a branchpoint. 22.8. Osler studied the derivative of a function by another function {see § defined to be
0< <
[1].
[1]
va
-1, -2,
17.2,
[2] (2.26)
[1]
[1] tP t)6 f(t) o 1) {22.4). z-, 0-) 2),
±1,±2, . . . ).
[7], (8],
[8], [10].
-
va ( {22.30).
15.3. [1]-[3], [5], [6]
[1], [4], (5],
[2]-(4]. (7],
(3a].
[1].
(22.3311) [2]-[8]
z.
z:
z,
(5.20)
[5],
[2]
18.3)
a j (z) = f{1 + a) vh(z) 21ri
J
L
f(t)h'(t)dt [h(t) - h(z)] l + a
[h(t) - h(z)] - 1 -a being a straight line going through t = z and t = h-1 (0) and h - 1 (o) and enveloping the point z.
with the cut for the contour L going through The relation
] }
1 +a a f(z)g ' (z) h(z) h(w) vga(z) f (z) = vh(z) h ' (z) g(z) - g(w) w=z in particular was proved, w = z being substituted after the evaluation of 'D h z { . . . } . () Campos [8] gave extensions of Taylor and Laurent expansions of constructions of the type 'D h(z / (z) in power of h(z). See also similar results in Osler (6] and Lavoie, Osler and Tremblay (1] for the case h(z) = z - a .
{
[
_
I
§ 23. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 4
453
22.9. Gaer (1] and Gaer and Rubel [1], [2] developed a peculiar approach to fractional integr�differentiation via investigating it as an entire function of the parameter a. The space G of functions analytic in the vicinity of the real line R1 and vanishing at infinity was considered. Showing that for each t R1 and any function f E G there exists a Wlique entire with respect to z function F(z, t) of exponential type with order of growth along the imaginary axis less than 11"1 such that kf (n ) (t) = F(n, t) , the authors defined the fractional derivative j(z)(t) as j(z)(t) = r{1 + z)F(z, t). On the basis of this definition a systematic investigation of integr� differentiation j ( z)(t) was undertaken in the cited papers. There is also a development of some of these results in Gaer (2], including an extension to the case of fractional powers of linear bounded operators in a Banach space. 22.10. In the paper by Kober [7), fractional integration in the Liouville form (and in Riesz form too) was considered in the Hardy spaces of functions f( z ) analytic in a half-plane or a strip. 22.1 1 . Fractional order differences with the fixed step h = 1 in the complex plane were considered by Diaz and Osler (1] in the form
E
00
A 01 f(z) = L ) - 1 ) l: (�) J(z + a - k) , l: = O
(cf.
z
E C,
(20.2)). The main result was the relation A or f(z) = r(a211"i+ 1)
f f(t)r(t r(t -
c
z - a) dt z + 1)
where the contour C enveloped the ray L = {t : t = z + a - e, e � 0} in the positive direction. A function f(z ) was assumed to be analytic in a domain, containing the ray L , and such that IJ(z)l � Ml( -z)01 -P I, p > 0. A Leibniz.-type formula for these differences A01 f(z ) was also obtained. 22.12. A wide range of applications of fractional integra-differentiation in the theory of analytic and meromorphic functions can be found in M.M. Dzherbashyan's papers. In his works (1], [2, Ch. IX, § 1-3], (3] fractional integr�differentiation was used to characterize some new spaces of meromorphic functions in the disc and to obtain their parameter representations (factorization theorems). In particular, a generalization of the Jensen-Nevanlinna expression, known in the theory of meromorphic functions, was given in tenns of the function v01 (pei'P, z) = p - a Ig+ log 11- pei'P / zl, a > -1, where the integra-differentiation is taken with respect to the variable p. The generalized operator L (w) - (18.110) - was used for the same purpose by Dzherbashyan (7a) . Similar results for functions meromorphic in a half-plane, but with the application of Liouville fractional integr�differentiation, can be found in Dzherbashyan, A.M. [1). In Dzherbashyan (6], (7) the fractional integr�differentiation 'D� was used to generalize the concept of quasi-analicity of functions. This generalization is based on replacing the integer order derivatives in (implication) j( n) (xo) = 0, n = 0, 1, . . . => f(x) = 0 by fractional derivatives of the form ('D�a J)(xo), 0 < a < 1. The papers by Dzherbashyan and Nersesyan (3], Dzherbashyan and Martirosyan [1] and Martirosyan and Ovesyan (1], concerning an applications of fractional differentiation in theory of quasi-analytic functions are also relevant. Dzherbashya.n and Nersesyan (4], (5) used Riemann-Liouville fractional integra-differentiation to construct and investigate expansions in biorthogonal systems related to Mittag-Lemer functions Ea ,p(z). They showed that these systems contain eigenfunctions of certain mutually conjugate boundary value problems for differential equations of fractional order. In this connection Dzherbashyan and Nersesyan [5], [6] gave a detailed investigation of such boundary value problems. These questions were further developed by Dzherbashyan (8]-(12]. 22.13. Let f (z) be a function analytic in the half-plane Rez > 0. Results concerning the behaviour at infinity can be found in Komatu [1]. lf Rej(z) > 0, then za - 1 ('D�0j)(z) - c/r{2-a) as z - oo, l arg z l � a < 11"/2, where c does not depend on f(z ) and a, a R1 , provided that
E
454
CHAPTER
4.
OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
Rezo > 0 and 1>:01 is the integro-difl'erentiation (22.3).
A certain analogue of this assertion for the disc was also obtained. For functions l(z) a.nalytic in the unit disc and satisfying conditions Rel(z) > 0 and 1(0) = 1 Komatu [2) proved the estimate 1110 III L ( Iz l=r) !5: r- a iiiQ'kii L . (Izl=r) where k(z) is a . fixed function, Ot > 0 and 10 I is the fractional integral (22.2) with zo = 0. 22.14. Riemann-Liouville fractional integro-difl'erentiation (1>:0l)(z), 0t e R1 and its modification (22.55) have wide applications in studying the properties of univalent, convex and starlike functions, questions connected with Biberbach problem on coefficients on univalent functions, estimates for coefficients, distortion theorems and so on. In the last decade many papers on these topics were published. We should like to emphasize the role of Komatu, Owa and Srivastava in the investigations on these themes. We refer, for example, to Komatu [1]-[7), Owa [1)-[18], Srivastava and Owa [1)-[7), Owa and Nishimoto [2), Owa and Shen [1], Reddy and Padma.nabhan [1], Al-Amiri [1], Owa and Ahuja [1], Sekine, Owa and Nishimoto [1], Srivastava, Sekine, Owa and Nishimoto [1], O wa and Al-Bassam [1], Owa and Obradovic [1], Owa and Sekine [1], Zhong zhu Zo [1], Cho, Lee, Kim and Owa [1], Owa and Ren [1], Fukui and Owa [1], Nunokawa and Owa [1], Saitoh [1], Sekine [1]-[2], Shanmugan [1] and Sohi [1). See also Owa, Saigo and Srivastava [1] and Srivastava, Saigo and Owa [1], where Saigo's generalization (see note 18.6 above) of fractional integro-difl'erentiation, extended to the complex plane, was used. 22.15. Dimovskii and Kiryakova [1] considered the weighted generalization ('D a ,J,&I)(z) =
E r(J��=:i,�) IJ:zk- 1
of the special Gel'fond-Leont'ev operator
k=l
sided inverse operator of integration
(Ja , ,.d>
obtained the integral representation of the type
(Ja , ,.. l )(z) =
f:
(22.41)
r ;!!� J,, zk + l . Jl
k=O r a
(22.42}:
1
r;a) J (1 - t)a- 1 tll - 1 l (zta )dt,
J.l.
�
and the right-hand 1n
particular, they
1
0
in the space H(G) of functions analytic in a starlike domain with the topology of compact convergence. All linear continuous operators T : H(G) H(G) commutiiig with Ja ,Jl were also characterized. Linchuk [1] extended this characterization to the case of an arbitrary complex J.1. and obtained a simpler form of the characterization. Operators (22.46) of generalized integro-differentiation in the form L a I = 22.16. -+
00
L ak l�:zk
were considered by Komatu
1:= 1
shown to admit, unlike
[3]
from the semigroup point of view and were
( 22.48) , the representation
La I =
j1 t-1 l(zt)d(Ta (t), 0
00
l (z) = z + l: h,z k , lz l < 1. k=2
Here the measure d(Ta (t) is determined by 0t and { aJ: } k:: · The case a k = 1/k was singled out, 1 and this corresponded to the operator � a of Hadamard fractional integration - note 22.3. In this case the measure (Ta (t) was constructed effectively. The case (7 (t) = t4, a > 0, when the density
1
(Ta(t) is r(:) ta- 1 (log t ) a - 1 , can be found in Komatu [6]. Some inequalities for the operators La may be found in Komatu [4]. Komatu [5] investigated the oscillation of Re [� L a l(z) ] on the unit disc in the case a k = k, the oscillation osc Re g (t) being defined as ltl = r max Re g (t) - min Re g (t), 0 < r < 1. of the measure
ltl =r
ltl=r
§ 23. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 4 455 22.17. Let a E R 1 and let H(a) be the space of functions j(z) analytic in the domain S(a) = {z E C lhnzl < a, 0 < a � +oo} and satisfying the following condition. Given t, 0 � t < a, there exists A(t) � 0 such that for each z = x + iy E S(t) the inequality lf(z)l � A(t) exp{x2 /2 - lxl(t2 - y2 ) 1 1 2 } holds. Rusev [1] showed that the Erdelyi-Kober-type
:
operator
1 1 = 2 1/2)] )(z) ( (1 - t2 ) 01 - 1 /2 f(zt)dt + a [r V- 1 / 2 1at+ 1 / 2 J
J 0
(cf.
(18.8)) with - 1/2 < a < 1/2 realizes the isomorphism of the topological vector space H(a), equipped with the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets of S(a), onto itself. This was used to demonstrate that a necessary and sufficient condition for an analytic function f(z) to
be representable in a strip S(a) by a series of generalized Laguerre polynomials {L�01) (z2 ) } :':o - ErdByi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricorni [21 10.12] with a e R 1 , a :# -1, -2, . . . - is that f(z) is an even functions in H(a). 22.18. Let
-. f b ( -zt ) f(t) -dtt2
1 (PJ )(z) = 2�a
(23.1 4)
C,
be an operator of the type ( 22 .48) with a rectifiable closed Jordan curve Cz enveloping the point z and lying in the domain G of analyticity of f(z) . Also let the function b(z) be analytic in the domain lz 0 and vanish at infinity with order not less than two. Korobeinik [1] , [2] proved that the operator ( 23 1 4) gives the general representation of a linear operator continuous in the space H ( G) of functions analytic in G. In the case 0 E G it coincides, for z sufficiently close to 0, with some Gel'fond-Leont'ev operator of generalized differentiation. Moreover, the operator and its powers admit also the representation by differential operators of infinite order:
II >
.
(Pm J)(z) = where the numbers
m
� 1.
At m I
are
A L !im z k -m j(A:)(z), oo
k=m
determined by
m=
1, 21 . . . ,
b(z) and satisfy the condition A:-oo lim
VI A�: m l I
=
0,
23.3. Answers to some questions put at the Conference on Fractional Calculus (New Haven, 1974) We complete the part of the book related to the case of one variable by answering some questions which were put at the conference, mentioned in the heading (Osler [9]). We single out below those questions from Osler [9], which have an answer. 1. The question from Erdelyi. Let f(x) be continuous for x 0 and let S be the set of all those nonnegative a for which ('V�\f)(x) exists and is continuous or locally integrable. Does S have the largest element? 2. The question from Lee Lorch. Does the mean value theorem of the differential calculus possess an analogue which connects differences of fractional order with derivatives of the same fractional order? 3. The question from Love. Are there any theorems known connecting fractional integrals I�+
�
4a. The question from Ross . The operation 1)�+ 1)�+ might be said to be a measure of deviation from the law of indices - the sernigroup property. What are some theorems that can define this and of what significance can this be?
456
CHAPTER
4. OTHER FORMS OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS
7. The question from Lew. Let {Ia } a�O be a family of operators in L 1 (0, 1) or L2(0, 1). Do t the conditions: "1° I = 1, 1 1 I = J l(u)du, 1a ]fJ = Ia +fJ, and 1a is continuous in some operator topology,
1a I � 0 for I � 0"
0
determine the family
{Ia } a �O uniquely?
The answers 1. The answer to the first question is in general negative: for l(x) = xf3 lnx, {3 > 0, we have S = [0, {3) and S = [0, {3 + 1) respectively to the cases of continuity or integrability of (Vij+ l)(x).
In the latter case we have S = [0, {3 + 1} for l(x) = xf3 , {3 > 0, too. 2. In the case of functions given, for example, on the real axis, the answer is readily given
in the form (Ah'l)(x) =
00
ha (D + J )h (x), where
- oo of a function �.p(x) with the kernel (20.14) - (20.30). However, it is not clear whether it is possible in the case of the continuous derivative to write the equality (Ah'l)(x) = h a (D f. l)({), { E R1 . The latter is valid in the case of integer a = I which follows from the expression
I0 I0 h
( A� I)(x) =
h
...
i<'>(x + t 1 +
· · ·
+ t1 )dt 1 . . . dt1 •
3. The answer is given in Sectjon 13, see the Corollary of Theorem 13.9. 4a. The answer is derived from the Corollary of Theorem 13.9: (I�+ I�+
Chapter 5 . Fract ional Integra D ifferent iat i on of Functions of Many Variables In this chapter we consider fractional integration and differentiation of functions of many variables. In the multidimensional case there arise first of all partial aorl +or:� I • d fract10na • • • • 1 denvatlves � azor , miXe a • • a} deriVatives a fract10n a z l 1 z&2 2 and so on, as • well as the corresponding fractional integrals. This approach is developed in § 24. However, another approach is p ossible, that is to introduce fractional powers ( �) a/ 2 for example where � = lzr + · · · + k · Such an approach is developed in §§ 25 and 26. It can be naturally generalized by considering the fractional power (P(V)] a of a differential operator P(V) in partial derivatives with constant coefficients. We do not dwell on such a generalization in this book, dealing only with some special cases of the operator P(V) in §§ 27 and 28. The reader can find references to more general cases in § 29.1, notes 28.2, 28.4 and 28.6. The following notations are adopted throughout this chapter. Rn denotes the n-dimensional Euclidean space, R,n is the compactification of Rn by the unique infinite point; x = X 1 J x2 , . . . , X n ), t = (t 1 , t 2 , . . . , t n ), etc, are points in Rn ; lxl = xf + x� + · · · + x�; x · t = x 1 t 1 + · · · + Xn t n is the scalar product in R!' ; x o t = (x 1 t 1 , . . . , Xn t n ) is the vector in Rn ; dt = dt 1 . . . dt n . We denote by Rf. ·+ = { x : x Rn , x1 2:::: 0, . . . , X n 2:::: 0} the region in R!' with nonnegative coordinates. Sn _ 1 will designate the unit sphere in Rn centered at the origin, ISn - 1 1 = 27rn / 2 r- 1 (n/2) being its area. By i = (it , h , . . . , in ) we denote any multi-index so that xi = x{1 �2 • • x�· and I i i = it + h + · · · + in . This is not to be • confused with the designation for distance in Rn . Let V = a� 1 , • • • , a . . Then Vi = 8z�1a lii8z�: · Writing a > 0 in the case a = ( at , . . . , an ) means that a�; > 0, k = 1, 2, . . . , n. As usual, Lp (Rn ) is the space of functions f(x) = f(x 1 , . . . , X n ) such
-
..
E
(
••.
that
11 /llv
=
{j.
1 /(x)l"dx
}
differentiable finite functions.
l/p
< oo;
Cif
=
Cif(R")
�)
is the space of infinitely
458
5.
CHAPTER
INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
§ 24. Partial and Mixed Integrals and Derivatives of Fractional Order The following is a direct extension of Riemann-Liouville fractional integra differentiation operations to the case of many variables, when these operations apply independently in each variable or in a part of them. Besides Riemann Liouville integra-differentiation, other forms will be also dealt with such as the Marchaud or Griinwald-Letnikov approaches, Weyl-type definitions for periodic functions of many variables and polypotentials.
24. 1 . The multidimensional Abel integral equation We begin with a generalization of (2.1) to the case of many variables. Let cp(z) = cp(z l l . . . , zn ), /(z) = /(zt , . . . , Zn ) be functions of n variables and let a = ( a1 , . . . , a n ) be a fixed point in Rn . We consider the equation 1
Zt
r(a)
Za
f...f a1
a"
cp(t)dt (z - t ) l - or = /(z), z > a,
(24.1)
where
(24.2) and writing z > a denotes that z 1 > a 1 , . . . , Zn > an . Assuming that 0 < a k < 1, k = 1, 2, . . . , n, we operate on each variable following just the same lines as in (2.2) and (2.3) . This gives the relation
/ j Zt
z"
...
a1
a.
cp(s)ds = r(1 1- a)
the notations of (24.2) being used here. Z t , . . . , Zn we obtain
/ j z1
a1
z"
. . . (zf(t)dt - t) or a.
Differentiating this with respect to
(24.3) Thus, if (24.1) has a solution, it is unique and is given by (24.3).
§ 24. PARTIAL AND MIXED INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
459
24.2. Partial and mixed fractional integrals and derivatives
(2.17}, we can naturally define the partial Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of the order ak with respect to the Starting from the one-dimensional definition k-th variable by the relation
(24.4} where a k > 0. This definition assumes functions
vector, we can rewrite the fractional integral
k- 1
(24.4} in the following shorter form
Further, the expression
1
= r (a)
fSOt . . . fSO,.
at
a ,.
a > 0, (z - t) l-a '
(24.5}
defined for functions
a left hand sided mixed Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order a = (a� , . . . , an )·
The mixed fractional integral may be applied to only some of the variables, i.e. the values a k = 0 may be admitted. In such a case we set 1::+
X ,.
1
f f
possible when integration is left-hand sided on some of the variables and right-hand
460
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
sided for others, for example,
(24.7) '
z"
(24.6), 1 - o:" = (1 - O:m+ l , . . . , 1 - o: n ), and = t = (t', t"), t' = (t � , . . . , tm ), t" (t m+ l , . . . , tn ), 1 ::; m ::; n . where
z
and
are the same as in
Starting from (24.4) and (2.22) we introduce a partial Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of order o:k, 0 < O:k < 1, in the k-th variable as
=
x,. - a,.
f( l
� ) a�. J0 "'•
c a · f(z - {e.)d{.
In the case of differentiable functions f(x) this may be written similarly to as 1 f(xb . . . , Xk - b ak , Xk +l , . . . , X n ) (xk - a�:) a,. f ( 1 - O:k)
(2.24)
[
(24.8)
In view of the inversion (24.3) valid for 0 < o:�: < 1, we shall call the right-hand side in (24.3) a mixed Riemann-Liouville derivative of order o: = (o: t , . . . , o:n ) · Similarly to (24.6) a mixed fractional derivative may be applied to some of the variables. Specifically let o:�: = 0 for k = m + 1, . . . , n, and 0 < o:�: < 1 , k = 1, 2, . . . , m , as in (24.6). The expression
(24.9)
a mixed Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of order o: = (o: b · · · , O:m , 0, . . . , 0). We note that the order of differentiation in (24.3) or (24.9) is essential. Thus, the function f(xb x 2 ) = (x2 - a) a� - 1 g(x t ), 0 < 0:2 < 1, where g(x t ) is assumed to be continuous but nothing more, has the derivative VC:+ / = 0 with the order of
will be called
§ 24.
PARTIAL AND MIXED INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
461
differentiation used in (24.3), but has no such a derivative if one takes 8 2 f8x 2 8x 1 in (24.3). If the function f(x) is differentiable up to order m, the form (24.9) may be transformed to an expression similar to (24.8) by means of differentiation under the integral signs. We limit ourselves by the corresponding result in the case of two variables, x = (x 1 , x 2 ):
In the case the equality
ak > 1 we define mixed fractional derivatives, following (2.30), by (24.10)
where j = ([cr t ] + 1, . . . , [am ] + 1, 0, . . . , 0). One may obviously introduce integra-differential operators 1:+ , a = (a 1 , . . . , an ) , with the orders cr t of different signs, i.e. such operations which imply fractional integration for some of the variables and fractional differentiation for others. The validity of the semigroup property
a+fJ t.p , a � 0, {3 � 0, a Ia+ fJ t.p -- Ia+ Ia+
(24.11)
is verified as in the proof of (2.21), a + {3 being the sum of vectors a and {3. The function cp (x) is assumed to be integrable in any bounded part of the region x > a. The reader may directly check that any monomial xfJ - 1 = x� 1 - 1 . . . x�· - 1 has partial or mixed fractional integrals or derivatives (24.4), (24.5), (24.9) or (24.10) with a choice a = (0, . . . , 0) evaluated by the formula
-nvo+ a (x{j - 1 ) - f({j) x{j -a- 1 ' f({j - a) _
CHAPTER
462
5.
INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
where {J = (P1 , . . . , Pn ) > 0 , a = ( a 1 , . . . , an ) is arbitrary, ::e01�, = 10+' in the case ' as < 0 and f({J) = f(P1 ) . . . f(Pn ) (cf. (2.44)). In the case of functions given on the whole space Rn we may consider
Liouville-type fractional integrals
(24.12) 1]01- · · ·- T f(a) m =
j
R" +···+
t 01 - 1 tTn(x + t)dt '
(24.13)
where R+ ··· + is the region {t : t 1 � 0, . . . , tn � 0}, t 01 - 1 = tr 1 - 1 · • • . t�· - 1 • One may also define fractional integration of the type 1� .. . -J:cp similarly to (24.7) with an arbitrary choice of signs + and -. Liouville partial derivatives V�" f are introduced by the relations
where
(24.14)
mixed Liouville derivatives
(24.15) are defined similarly to (24.9),
(24.10), e.g.
We note also the validity of the "fractional integration by parts" formula
J cp(x)(I� ·· + ,P)(x)dx = J tJI (x)(I� .. . _cp)(x)dx,
R•
which can be derived directly from (5.16).
R•
(24.16)
§ 24.
PARTIAL AND MIXED INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
463
24.3. The case of two variables. Tensor product of operators We shall specially consider the case of two variables x 1 and x2 in this subsection. It is convenient to use the concept of the tensor product of operators, introduced by the following definition.
Let A 1 u and A2 v be linear operators defined on functions u(x l ) and v(x2 ) of one variable. The tensor product of operators A 1 and A2 is an operator A 1 ® A2 , which is defined on functions of the form
Definition 24. 1.
(24.17) by the relation (24.18) In the case of concrete classes X of functions tp (for example, X = Lp ( R2 )) the functions of the form (24.17) generate, as usual, a dense set in X, so the operator A1 ® A2 if continuous, is uniquely extended from the functions (24.17) to the whole space X . It follows from Definition 24.1 that the mixed fractional integral 1:+ tp, a = ( a 1 7 a 2 ), is the tensor product of one-dimensional fractional integrals: . .
(24.19) the same being true for fractional differentiation
In the case when
a 1 and a2 have different signs we write
Liouville forms (24.12) and (24.13) of fractional integration for functions tp(xb x 2 ), defined on the whole plane, are
(24.20)
464
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
One may also consider the operators
I±a =t= 'P - J±a 1 _
tOt. '¢1
I=Fa�
under the respective choice of signs. The case partial fractional integration
(a l ,O) - 1±a 1 l±± _
tOt. '¢1
(24.21)
a1
0 or a 2 = 0 corresponds to
=
(O ,a� ) - E I±a� , E , J±± _
tOt. '¢1
(24.22)
E being the identity operator. Let Q 1
in correspondence with definition The evident relations
(24.18), Q being the operator defined in (5.9).
are true, cf. (5.9). Fractional differentiation can also be written (24.22), for example
O v�a , , ) I = (V;li ® E) f = ± r ( l a ) l
V±± f = V±1 ® v±� I and so on.
m
a form similar to
� a:, I tf' - I /(r, - t� o r,)clt, 0 00
(24.19)
(24.23)
The concept of tensor product of operators is easily extended to the case of n variables, but we shall not dwell on such an extension.
24.4. Mapping properties of fractional integration operators in the spaces L-p(Rn ) (with mixed norm) To simplify the exposition we shall consider the case of two variables x 1 and x 2 only. Our aim being a natural extension of the Hardy-Littlewood theorem 5.3, we C a � , a� ) not from L (R2 ) into L (R2 ) shall deal with operators l±(a � ,o ) , l±o, a � ) and J±± p q , but within the frames of the spaces of functions integrable in respect to each variable with in general the different powers P l and P2 . Specifically let us define
§ 24.
PARTIAL AND MIXED INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
465
Ute space L11(R2 ), p = (Pt , P2 ), of functions /(zt , z2 ) with the finite norm
(24.24)
i
where, as usual, 1 � Pi < oo, = 1, 2. The space L11(R2 ) is known as the aonn space. It is clear that L11(R2 ) = Lp (R2 ) in the case p1 = P2 = p. The main theorem below is preceded by the following auxiliary lemma.
mixed
Let A1 be an arbitrary linear operator bounded from Lp1 ( R1 ) into 1 and let L91 (R ) A2 be a convolution operator
Lemma 24.1.
00
A2 cp =
j k(€)cp(z2 - €)de
-oo
with a non-negative kernel k(€) ;::: 0, which is bounded from Lp2 (Rt ) into L92(R1 ), 1 � Pa < oo , 1 � qi < oo, i = 1, 2. Then the operator At ® A 2 is bounded from L,(R2 ) into L,(R2 ), p = (Pt , P2 ), q = (q b q2 ) ·
Proof. The operator At ® E is bounded from Lp1,92 (R2 ) into L91,92 (R2 ) (for any
At is bounded from Lp1 (R1 ) into L9 1 (R1 ) , this being easily verified by means of Fubini's Theorem 1.1. Since A 1 ® A2 = (At ® E)( E ® A2 ), it is sufficient then to show that the operator E ® A2 is bounded from Lp1,p 2 (R2 ) into Lp1, 92 (R2 ). We have q2 ) if the operator
( E ® A2 )cp =
00
j k(t2 )cp(z 1 z2 - t2)dt2 ,
- oo
t
and applying the generalized Minkowsky inequality
(1.33) we obtain the estimate (24.25)
the norm being taken with respect to the first variable. Since llcp( · , t 2 ) llp1 E Lp2 (R1 ) and A2 is bounded from Lp2 (R2 ) into L92 (R2 ) , after estimating (24.25) under L92(Rt )-norm with respect to z2 , we have
466
CHAPTER
5.
INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
which was what is required.
•
Let 1 5 Pi < oo, 1 5 qi < oo, = 1, 2. The operator Iia 1 ,o) of partial fractional integration is bounded from Lp 1,p� (R2 ) into Lq1 ,q� (R2 ) if and only if {24.26) Operators Ji'f· a� ) of mixed fractional integration are bounded from Lp 1,p � (R2 ) into L q1,q� (R2 ) if and only if
i
Theorem 24.1.
1 < Pi < 1/ai , 1/qi = 1/Pi - at,
i = 1 , 2.
{24.27)
In view of {24.22) and {24.20) the sufficiency part of this theorem follows directly from Lemma 24.1 and the one-dimensional Hardy-Littlewood Theorem 5.3. The verification of the necessity of {24.26) and {24.27) is realized in the same way as in the case of functions of one variable in Theorem 5.3, if we introduce the dilatation operator in each variable:
A 1 ® E and E ® A 2 in 2 the space Lp(R ) is unequal because of integration {24.24) being taken first in x 1 and then in x 2 • The operator A 1 ® E is bounded from Lp 1,p � (R2 ) into L q1 ,p � (R2 ) for any p2 , and any operator A 1 1 bounded from Lp 1 (R1 ) into L q1 (R1 ), by Fubini's theorem, while the fact that the operator A 2 is bounded from L q1 (R 1 ) into L q� (R2 ) implies that of the operator E ® A 2 from Lp 1,q1 (R2 ) into Lp 1,q� (R2 ) not for all p1 . (We refer to Krepkogorskii [1] for examples of such bounded operators A2 in L 2 (R1 ) that E ® A2 is bounded in Lp 1,2 (R2 ) not for all pi ) . Remark 24.1. Let us note that the behaviour of operators
24. 5. Connection with a singular integral For functions of two variables we consider the operator
- oo
- oo
{24.28)
§ 24.
467
PARTIAL AND MIXED INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
ao, a t , a 2
and
a 12
for the one-dimensional singular operator (which is familiar from § represent the bisingular operator (24.28) in terms of tensor products:
11),
we can
known as a bisingular integral operator. The coefficients taken to be real. Using the designation 00
Scp =
Lemma 24.2.
the space
.!_ f 1r
- oo
are
cp(t)dt t-x
The bisingular operators S ® E, Lp(R2 ), 1 < Pi < oo ,
E®S
i
=
and S ® S are bounded in
1, 2.
In this lemma that S ® E is bounded follows from Lemma 24.1. We do not give the proof for E ® S, noting only that it can be obtained by means of a theorem of .T. Schwartz [1] on singular operators with values in a Banach space - Lizorkin [7]. As for S ® S, that it is bounded follows from the relation S ® S = (S ® E)(E ® S). We designate by
J
Na 1
fractional integration operators If. and I'!. with each other. We introduce the similar bisingular operator
(24.29) which allows us to write analogous connections between the operators If. + , If._ and I'!._ .
Let
Theorem 24.2.
i
=
1, 2. The following (24.30) (24.31) (24.32)
468
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
Proof.
Equations (24.30)-(24.32) are easily derived from the corresponding equations ( 11.10) and ( 1 1 .1 1 ) for functions of one variable. Indeed, (11 .10) and ( 1 1 . 11) show directly the validity of (24.30)-(24.32) for functions of the form
cp(zt,z2 ) = L:u,(zt)v, {z2 ), u,(zt) E Lp 1 (R1), v,(z2 ) E Lp2(R1) . •
L1(R2 )
Such functions are dense in and we observe that it is sufficient to consider to be step functions only. Thus the validity of the required and equations follows from the boundedness of the operators on the left- and right-hand. The latter is given by Theorem 24.1 and Lemma 24.2. •
u,(zt)
v,(z2 )
24.6. Partial and mixed fractional derivatives in the Marchaud form In the case of "good" functions we can represent partial Liouville fractional derivatives (24.14) in the Marchaud form according to (5.57):
(24.33) k-1
where e k = �, 1, 0, . . . , 0). A similar passage in the case in (5.80), so that
a k 2:: 1 is made as (24.34)
where the integer lk is chosen to be lk > a�c , the finite difference d��" applies in respect to the variable Z k and x(a k , lk ) is the constant (5.81). Hence it is readily seen that for mixed fractional derivatives V± ·± f, a = (at , . . . , an ), we obtain ..
a > 0,
(24.35)
§ 24. PARTIAL AND MIXED INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES instead of (24.34). In
469
(24.35) the mixed finite difference
( �� f)(x) = �!� [�!� . . . (�!: J)](x) = E ( -1 )Ii i O $j $ 1
(�) !(X J
j 0 t)
(24.36)
of the vector order l = (It , . . . , ln) and with a vector step t = ( t 1 , . . . , tn) is used. Here j o h = (it h 1 , . . . , in hn) and /1: are integers such that 0 < a1: < l1: and n = (,�,.) . The normalizing constant x( a, l) in (24.35) is equal to I1 C) J
1: =1 ,.
x ( a , l) =
n
IT x(ak , 1�: ) .
1: =1
We shall denote the right-hand side in (24.35) by the new notation Df: ± /, taking into account the fact that it may exist when Vf: ± / does not exist. In (24.35) various kinds of fractional differentiation of the type V+ - + for example, may be considered, which correspond to various choice of signs: we deal with the left-hand sided differentiation for some of the variables and with the right-hand sided for others. In this case the step of the difference is chosen of the type (tt , -t2 , -t3, t4, ) , which corresponds to the selected distribution of signs + and - . Let c = (c 1 , . . . , en) > 0. We shall call ...
...
...
• • •
(24.37) a truncated Marchaud fractional derivative. It was assumed in (24.35) and (24.37)
that a > 0. The reader can easily write down . the corresponding constructions in the cases when a1: = 0 for some k = 1, 2, . . . . We shall briefly consider the notion of fractional integra-differentiation in a given direction. Various types of definition are possible. The Marchaud form (24.33) of partial fractional differentiation in the k-th variable admits of a direct generalization to the case of differentiation in a given direction. Thus, let '.tJ = (w t , . . . , wn), lwl = 1 , be a vector in defining a direction. Starting from (24.33)
470
CHAPTER
5.
INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
we shall call the expression
f
00
- ew) de . (vwa !)( X ) = f(1 a- a) f(x) -ef(x l+a 0
(24.38)
the fractional derivative in the direction w of order a ( E R1 ), 0 < a < 1.
from (24.34) we shall define the fractional derivative of arbitrary order a a given direction by the formula
oo ( �� f)(x) de 1 / _ w _ a (Vw f)(x) = x(a, l) e l +a
E R� in
Starting
(24.38')
0
using the finite difference taken along the direction w, lw I = 1. This definition is well suited to functions f(x), defined in Rn , or at least in the infinite domain containing with each its point and also the ray starting from this point and having the same direction as the vector -w. As for functions defined in a bounded domain 0 in Rn , it is possible to introduce an analogue of Marchand fractional derivative (13.2) for the interval. Specifically, let a = ( a � , . . . , an ) be a fixed point in the domain 0. Starting from (13.2) and (24.38) we introduce the expression
a D aa+ f - f(1 - f(x) a) l x - a l a + f(l - a)
f
lx-al /( x ) - f
0 < a < 1,
0
(x -
e l +a
c �
rx=aT
x-a )
de, (24.38")
and call it a fractional derivative of order a in the point x in the direction from the point a. A similar variant with D�_f might be called a derivative in the direction
to the point a .
We may also define
the fractional integral in a given direction as I::,f = r (lOt) f ( a- t f(x - (w)d(. 00
(24.39)
0
In the case of sufficiently good functions derivative (24.38) in the form
f(x)
we can write the fractional
1 -a vwa f = .!!:_ dw 1w f, 0 < a < 1,
§ 24. PARTIAL AND MIXED INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
fw denoting the usual differentiation in the direction
471
The operation (24.38') is the inverse to fractional integration (24.39 ) : V�I�cp = cp in the case of sufficiently good functions cp(x). This may be verified directly, but it is much easier to refer to ( 24.48' ) for the Fourier transform of fractional integrals and derivatives. Relations (24.48') yield also the semigroup property I�Ie cp = [�+P ep . § 29.2, note 24.3 gives further information of fractional integro-differentiation in a given direction. w.
24.7. Characterization of fractional integrals of functions in
L1( R2 )
We deal with functions f(x 1 1 x2 ) of two variables in this subsection. The results obtained here are similar to those of § 6.2 and may be considered as their direct extension to the case of partial and mixed fractional integro-differentiation of 1 . t o - 1 - (t - l ) o+ functions of two variables. Following (6.7) we denote K a (t) = sm1ra 1r + , t thereby noting the dependence of this kernel on a. Like in ( 6.6) we obtain the relations 00
D �! �0) /�a 1 ' 0) cp = I Ka 1 (t)cp(x l - g l t, x2 )dt, 0
n �:::'J ) /�O, a'J ) cp = I Ka 'J (t) cp(x l , X 2 - C2t)dt, 0 00
(24.40) (24.41 )
00 00
D++ ,e i++ cp = I I Ka 1 (t)Ka'l(t)cp(x l - c 1 t 1 , X2 - c2t 2 )dt 1 dt2 , (24.42) 0 0 o where D �!� ) = D��e1 ® E is the truncated Marchaud fractional differentiation (5.59) in the first variable, D�;;:'J ) being the same in the second variable, while D+ + ,e is the truncated mixed Marchaud fractional differentiation (24.37) . o Theorem 24.3. Let j(x 1 7 x 2 ) = /�a 1 , ) cp with cp(x 1 , x 2 ) E L,(R2 ), 1 $ Pl < 1/a l , o 1 $ P2 < oo. Then cp(x l ! x 2 ) = e1limo D �, ! ,1 ) /, the limit being taken in L,(R2 )nonn. Similarly, if f(x l , x2 ) = If. + cp with cp(x l ! x2 ) E L,(R2 ), 1 $ Pi < 1/ai , i = 1, 2, then (24.43) Theorem 24.3 is proved by means of ( 24.40)- ( 24.42) following the same lines in Theorem 6.1: the properties (6.7) and (6.8) of the kernels K a i(t), i = 1, 2, are to be used.
as
472
CHAPTER
5.
INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
We introduce similarly to (6.1) the space
(24.44) of mixed fractional integrals of functions belonging to L1(R2 ) . This space is properly defined if 1 � Pi < a i , = 1, 2. By Theorem 24.2, and in view of the boundedness of the bisingular operator N01 1 , 01� in £1( R2 ) by Lemma 24.2, the space (24.44) does not depend on the choice of the signs if 1 < Pi < 1/ati , = 1, 2, so we denote
i
i
l01 (L,) de/ = I+. +(L1 ) = I� _ (L,) = I+._ (L1) = I�+ (L,) ,
1 < Pi < -1 , 0 � Oti < 1, Oti
i = 1, 2.
(24.45)
In the theorem below we use the designation
- (
)
2 -1 P01 = 1 -PtOttPt , 1 -P0t2 P2 , 1 < Pi < Oti , and notation D i. + ,e f for the truncated Marchaud derivative Theorem 24.4.
i = 1, 2, (24.37).
i
Let 0 < ai < 1, 1 < Pi < ;i , = 1, 2. Then f(x) E l01 (Lp) if and
only if 1) f(x) E L,"' (R2 ), 2) there exists e-o lim D ++ e f in Lp( R2 ). '
Proof. The "only ir' part follows from Theorem 24.3. The "if" part will be obtained following the proof of the sufficiency criterion in Theorem 6.2. We are to show that conditions 1) and 2) imply the representability f (x) = I++cp with lim D ++ ' e f E Lp. cp E L1(R2 ). Let us denote g(x) = I++ D ++J, where Di.+/ = e-o Instead of the equality /(x) = g(x) we shall prove the coincidence
(24.46) of finite differences of these functions. Vve mean here the mixed difference of the first order in each variable, see (24.36). Further arguments are exactly the same as in Theorem 6.2 after (6.21) and so the proof is left to the reader. We only note
§ 24.
PARTIAL AND MIXED INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
two main points: a) instead of the operator
473
(6.22) we have to use the operator
Ah
Ah D ++,e l =
j j K-a 1 (tt)K,a� (t2 )(��i'1���)1)(z - d)dt. 00
Theorem 24.4 allows us to obtain information on partial fractional derivatives from information on the mixed fractional derivative. Specifically the following Corollary is true.
Let J� D++ .e l E Lp(R2 ), I E Lp01(R2 ). Then D�a 1 ,o) I E Lp 1 ,r� (R2 ), D�,a� ) I E Lr1 ,p� (R2 ), ri = Pi /(1 - aiPi ), i = 1, 2. l, (al,Indeed, o) l++al,a�I) l/}r =-- IIf.+a+� rli'J
. D+
24.8. Integral transform of fractional integrals and derivatives The whole of this section is concerned with functions of n variables defined on the whole space Let
R" .
:F
be the multidimensional Fourier transform. Since the latter reduces to successive applications of one-dimensional Fourier transforms to each variable, we conclude from Theorem 7.1 that the following relations
:Flf. . . .+
(24.47) (24.48)
( -iz)a
are valid for Liouville fractional integrals (24.12) and (24.13), where = 0 < a k < 1, k = 1, . . . , n, being defined in the same way and E One may evidently write the relations for I± ... for all choices of signs + and
(-izt) a1 ( -izn )a",
(ix )a ±
474
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
The results
:F(I: f) = (- ix · w ) - a }(x), :F(V:J) = (- ix · w)0 }(x)
(24.48')
for fractional integra-differentiation 1�/, V�f in the direction w see (24.38) and (24.38') are also established by direct transformations. Let -
(24.39),
-
Ltp =
e- y·t tp(t)dt, J R+· · · +
y = ( Yb . . . , Yn ) ,
be the multidimensional Laplace transform, 0, . . . , tn � 0}. Similarly to (7.14) we obtain
R+ ··· +
(24.49)
being the region {t : t 1 >
(24.50) where
� . � .. j t I0+ tp = r o:) . . j < x - t) a - 1 tp(t)dt. 0 0 .
(24.51)
The known result for differentiation of the Laplace integral
is extended to fractional integra-differentiation: thus
V� ... _ Ltp = Lt/;, 1/J (t ) = t 0 tp(t), o: � 0, I� _ Ltp = Lt/;, 1/; (t) = t - a tp(t), o: < 0, ...
(24.52) (24.53)
which can be verified directly by interchanging the order of integration on the left-hand side. The relation (24.53) is valid for � 1 also, if t - a tp(t) is integrable. For the multidimensional Mellin transform
o:
(9Jttp)(x) =
j
+· · · +
R"
t� - 1 tp(t)dt
(24.54)
§ 24. PARTIAL AND MIXED INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
475
the relations
(roug+
(24.56)
are valid under the usual assumption r(x + o:) = on. The proof of the above relations is not dealt with in detail: it is easily derived from the corresponding one-dimensional formulae in § 7 under the appropriate assumptions on functions
similar to
(7.20)
(24.55)
and
(7.21),
r(z l + a l) . . . r {zn + an ) and
so
24.9. Lizorkin function space invariant relative to fractional integro-differentiation
Following § 8.2 we define here the space ci> of functions of many variables which will be invariant relative to partial and mixed fractional integra-differentiation. As in § 8.2, the idea of constructing such a space is clear in Fourier transforms. Namely, in view of (24.47) and (24.48) it is clear that the required invariance of the space ci> holds if the functions
li i = 0, 1, 2, . . . , k = 1, 2, . . . , n}. "
- I,;I:J - 2: ,;;:J The function ,P( z) = e •=• is an example of such a function in \11 . We shall call the space
(24.56') of Fourier transforms of functions in
�(i ) (z)l,; • = o = ili l
W Lizorkin space.
Since
J ei,;' ·t' (t')i'dt' J
R•- •
- oo
476
CHAPTER
5.
INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
where t' = (t t , . . . , t k - t ,t k+ b · · · � t n ), j' = (h , . . . , jk - b ik+b · · · , jn ), it follows immediately from the definition that the space �(Rn ) consists of those and only
those functions
I
- oo
I
m = 01 11 21
• • •
=
0,
1 k = 1, . . . n. I
We easily derive directly from the definition that if
(24.47) and {24.48) are valid for all
Lemma 24.3 follows from Lemma 8.1 if we take into account the fact that the function
(24.57)
Q > 0, wl1ere t a-l + for a single
- t at-l 1 . . . t na--l , 'f t 1 > 0 1 k = 1, 2, . . . , n. 1
• • •
, tn > 0 , and t +a-l =- 0, 'f t k < 0 even 'f 1
1
24.10. Fractional derivatives and integrals of periodic functions of many variables Let us consider periodic functions f(x) = f(x l , . . . , xn ) of many variables. Let � = {x : 0 � Xi < 211'} be the period cube and let Ck = (211') - n J f(x)e i k· :edx,
k = (k1 , . . . , kn ), be the Fourier coefficients of the function f(x).
of this function is
f(x) -
00
L ck e ib = L k t = - oo k.=-oo - oo
�
The Fourier series
§ 24.
477
PARI'IAL AND MIXED INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
The Weyl fractional integra-differentiation of a periodic function /(z) is defined similarly to (19.5)-(19.6). While the one-dimensional fractional integral was determined for all ( summable) functions not containing the constant in the Fourier series, we are now to exclude functions constant in each variable. Namely, following (19.5) we define the multiple (mixed) Weyl integral of a periodic function as J(c:r) / = � 1 � ei k·z , (24.58)
c0
-oo
LJ
( "k) 1
c:r
the dash denoting omission of all (!) the terms with multiindices k = (kt , . . . , kn ) such that k, = 0 even if for a single i = 1, . . . , n. Thereby we consider, in fact, those functions which have Ci = 0 for such k, i.e.
j0 /(zl J . . . , za- l Je, za+l , . . . , zn )cle 2 W'
(24.59)
=0
i 1, 2, . . . , n. Following Lizorkin and Nikol'skii [1] we call a periodic function /(z) neutral on A, if it satisfies the condition (24.59) for all i 1, 2, . . . , n.
for
=
=
As for fractional differentiation, we define it by the expansion
v
E Ci (ik) c:r e ii·z .
-oo
(24.60)
We have chosen, for definiteness, the variant of left-hand sided fractional integra-differentiation with respect to each variable in (24.58) and (24.60). In correspondence with (24.12) or (24.13) , for example, we might use symbols ����+ and 1)��?. + , but we shall not consider any other forms except the left-hand sided one for the periodic functions. The Weyl fractional integral (24.58) considered for functions /(z 1 7 . . . , zn ), neutral and summable on A, is interpreted similarly to (19.7) as fi<>l
J
(24.61) / = (2!)n /(z - t) ft "ti� (t;)dt, a; > 0, t=l A where '\lf+i (t i ) are functions (19.8) of one variable. We may admit the cases when a, = 0 for some values of i. In these cases we must omit the integration in (24.61) with respect to the corresponding variables. For simplicity we assume that o, > 0, i = 1, 2, . . . , n.
In the case of sufficiently good functions we may write the Weyl fractional differentiation (24.60) with 0 < o < 1 as
(24.62)
478
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
where 1 - a = ( 1 - a 1 , . . . , 1 - er n ) · Theorem 24.5.
The operator J(a) is bounded in the space Lp(�), 1 � p � oo. then J(a) is bounded from Lp(�) into L9 (�) ,
1 < p < {J = (m� cr; )- 1 , • q = p/(1 - {Jp).
If
n
The first assertion of the theorem is evident since TI
i= l
w +i(t;) E
L t (�) , the
second is obtained by successive application of the corresponding one dimensional statement (19.62) and use of the imbedding Lp(�) C Lr(�), p > r. One can also obtain a statement similar to Theorem 24.1 on the boundedness of the Weyl operator J(a) within the frames of the mixed norm spaces Lp. We leave this to the reader. Quite analogously to Lemma 19.3, using properties of the functions w +i (t;), we obtain the following theorem.
The Weyl fractional integral (24.61) of 2 1r -periodic functions
Theorem 24.6.
I( "') v> = 1'\- ... + 'P =
r(l<>) J
<>
<
1,
R+· ·· +
provided that the integral on the right-hand side zs treated as conventionally convergent at infinity:
J
R+· ·· +
2rm1
lim
l m l- oo
2rm,.
j ... j 0
0
Other statements of § 19 for fractional integra-differentiation of one variable can be extended similarly to the multidimensional case. We note for example, by generalizing (19.34), that the Weyl fractional derivatives (24.62) coincide with Marchaud derivatives (24.35):
1 v(a) I = x(a,-I)
j
R+· · · +
( �� f)(x) dt , a > o . t l +a
(24.63)
§ 24.
479
PARTIAL AND MIXED INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
We also give the formulation of the following theorem, which is proved in the same way as Theorem 19.2.
Let f(x) be a periodic function, neutral on � and let f(x) E Lp(�), 1 � p < oo. Then f(x) is representable by the mixed Weyl fractional integral:
Theorem 24. 7.
if and only if climo D+·· · + ' c f E Lp(�), the limit being taken under Lp(�)-norm. 24. 1 1 . Griinwald-Letnikov fractional differentiation We define partial and mixed Grunwald-Letnikov fractional derivatives of functions /(z) = /(z t , . . . , Zn ) of many variables, following (20.7). Let h = (h t , . . . , hn ) be a vector increment and let
(24.64) be a difference of a fractional vector order a = ( a 1 , . . . , O'n ) , a � 0, i = 1, 2, . . . , n, with a vector step h. In (24.64) j denotes a multiindex and j o h = (it hb . . . , jn hn ) , (j) = (j:) . . . (j:) , so (24.64) turns into (24.36) in the case when all the O'i are integers. We define now the Griinwald-Letnikov fractional derivative of order a = ( a- 1 , . . . , a n ) by the relations
(24.65) (24.66) where h01 = hr1 h�· , hi > 0, i = 1, 2, . . . ' n. We now give without proof certain extensions of the results exhibited in § 20 to the multidimensional case. First we formulate the generalization of Theorem 20.2 stating that the mixed Griinwald-Letnikov derivative (24.65) of a periodic function /(z) = /(z t , . . . , zn ) exists simultaneously with the Marchand derivative. Let � = { z : 0 � Zi < 21r}. • • •
Theorem 24.8. Let a periodic function f(x) belong to the 1 � p < oo . The mixed Griinwald-Letnikov derivative (24.65) exists
space Lp(�), simultaneously
480
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
with mixed Marchaud derivative and they coincide: ( /)(x) = lim � � a h-+O
(£,.(6) )
h
-1x( a
'
I)
00
lim
00
j . . . j (�t�f)(x) l + a dt.
c-o (L,.(6))c 1
c,.
is similar in a sense to that of Theorem 20.2 and needs Theorem 24.6 and the results of § 20 to be taken into account. The corresponding result for a non-periodic case is more difficult. We concentrate on the non-mixed case, when a is a scalar. Let � � / be a fractional order difference with a vector step h = (h 1 , , h n ), defined as in (24.64) but with scalar j = 0, ± 1 , . . . and j o h = jh. The following theorem shows that the Griinwald-Letnikov approach via the quotient ��£ yields fractional differentiation (24.38') in the fixed direction r*T ·
The proof
• • •
Theorem 24.8' .
limits
Let f(x) e Lr(R"), 1 � r < oo, or /(z) e C(R"). Then the
where X = Lp(R"), 1 � p < oo, or X = C(R"), exist simultaneously and coincide, the values of p and r being independent.
of fractional differentiation in a given direction with demonstrated by the following theorem.
Certain connections fractional differences is also
Let f(x) e Lr (R"), 1 < r < oo. Then the fractional derivative ( 24 . 38' ) exists as an integral convergent in Lp(R"), 1 < p < oo, if and only if
Theorem 24.811•
c being independent on t. The
proof of Theorems 24.8' and 24.8" can be found in Samko (34].
24. 12. Operators of the polypotential type
Starting from (12.1) we introduce the operator of the Riesz potential type in each variable (24.67)
§ 24. PARTIAL AND MIXED INTEGRALS AND DERIVATIVES
481
n
a k > 0, ak '/ 1 , 3, 5, . . . , k = 1, . . . , n; A = 2" n r (a k ) cos ak 1r/2. k= l We shall call (24.67) the operator of the Riesz polypotential type. The operator
where
(24.68) n
ak > 0, a�: '/ 2, 4, 6, . . . , B = 2" TI f(ak ) sin ak 1r/2, can also be defined as a k= l generalization of (12.2). The operators IC01 and 1l01 are well defined for example, for functions cp(t) E L,(R:'), 1 � p < �n(1/a k ), which can be shown as in the one-dimensional case (see § 5.1). We can prove directly by the one-dimensional Hardy-Littlewood Theorem 5.3 (by its successive application to each variable) that in the case a 1 = a2 = · · · = an the operators IC01 and 1l01 are bounded from the space L,(R") 1 < p < 1/a�, into the space L 9 (R") , q = p/(1 - a 1 p). with
It is of much more interest to have information on the mapping properties of polypotential type operators in L, for different values of a�:. In this case it is natural to consider the space L, with a vector p = (p1 , . . . , Pn ) - see § 24.4. Thus generalizing (24.24), we consider the space L,(R!' ) of functions with the mixed norm
The po/ypotential type operator /C01, a = (a l l . . . , an ), a k > 0 is bounded from L,(R" ) into Lq(R") with p = (Pl l . . . , pn ) , q = ( q1 , . . . , qn ) , 1 � PI: < oo, 1 � q k < oo, if and only if
Theorem 24.9.
Theorem 24.9 is proved following arguments developed in the proof of Theorem the "ir' part is obtained by the successive application of Hardy-Littlewood Theorem 5.3 to each variable, while the "only ir' part needs the use of the dilatation operator. We might easily extend various results for one-dimensional operators in § 12 to the case of polypotential type operators. We outline only connections between the operators /C01 and 1l01 via the polysingular operator. In the one-dimensional
24.1:
482
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
case such a connection was given by {12.6) and identities yield the following relationships
for the operators
K,<)/
and 1f0t , where S is
{12.7).
It is readily seen that these
{24.69) the polysingular operator
Scp = J n cp(t)dt Rn n (t k - Z k ) k=t ( treated in the principal value sense) . It is assumed that a k > 0. If a k = 0 for some k, polypotentials and the polysingular operators are taken for those variables for which ak :/; 0. It is also easily proved by means of {12.19)-{12.21) that
{24.70) where a = (at , . . . , an ), {3 = {f3t , . . . , f3n ), a + {3 = (at + {3� , . . . , an + f3n ) · The Fourier transform of the polypotential K, a cp is evaluated in view of {12.23) by the relation
n
(�)(x) = IT lz k l -a,. <,O{z) k= t
(cf. (24.47) and (24.48)).
One can also define operators of Bessel type
potentials:
Ga
..
k= t
(24.71)
{24.72)
(see
(18.61)), where the kernel Ga ,. {z k ) has the Fourier transform, in the variable X k , equal to (1 + l z k 1 2 ) -a,. / 2 • The modification of the polypotential {24.72) generalizing (18.64): (24.73)
§ 25.
483
RIESZ FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
can also be mentioned. Let
denote the spaces of functions representable in the form (24.72) and (24.73) respectively with
(24.74) The spaces aa ( Lp) and Gf. ( Lp) may be characterized in terms of the existence in Lp of mixed fractional derivatives, and thus they are called function spaces with a dominating mixed derivative, see § 29.2, note 24.4. ·
§ 25. Riesz Fractional Integro-Differentiation We shall now study fractional integra-differentiation of functions of many variables which is a fractional power ( -t::.) a/ 2 of the Laplace operator. The idea of how to define such a power is obvious in Fourier transforms: (-!::. ) al 2 f = .r- 1 l zl a .1"/ in the case of sufficiently good functions f, - see (25.6) below. The investigations in this section are aimed at the effective construction of such a fractional power and studying its properties. The negative powers (-t::. ) a/ 2 , Re a > 0, will be Riesz potentials
[a
a -::j;
n, n + 2, n + 4, . . . ,
(25.1)
which have already been considered in Section 12 in the one-dimensional case; the normalizing constant "Yn (a ) is defined below. The positive powers of the Laplace operator will be realized as the so-called hypersingular integrals n a 1, defined below by (25.59). The operation
Rea > 0, Rea < O where exact definitions are given below will be the object which we call
Riesz integro-differentiation.
(25.2) a fractional
The natural and convenient apparatus for the investigation of Riesz integra differentiation is the Fourier transform.
484
CHAPTER
5.
INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
25. 1 . Preliminaries Let
/(z) = (F
(25.3)
be the Fourier transform of a function
be the inverse Fourier transform. It is well known that
:F(1J; f) = ( -iz)i /(x),
j = (it , · · · , jn ),
(25.4)
so that we have
(25.5) for the Laplace operator � ' or
(25.6) It is also well known that the Fourier transform of the convolution
f
R•
(25.7)
is given by the formula
(25.8) F(f •
J
Sa - l
71'(n - 1)/ 2 1 /(z . cr)dcr = 2r (!!f-) J /(lzlt)(l - t 2 )(n-3)/ 2dt, -1
(25.9)
§ 25.
485
RIESZ FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
known in the integral calculus. Its proof may be found for example in Fikhtengolts p. or in Samko p. We recall that is a unit sphere in being the surface element on centered at the origin,
[1,n 405-407] R,
[3 1, 42-43]). do-
Sn- 1 Sn- 1 ·
The Fourier transform of a radial function is a radial function again. Also the following relation is valid:
Lemma 25. 1.
N
e • y cp( J y l ) dy l ;�:t�;2 J ,P (p)pn/ 2 Jn/ 2 - I (p J z l ) dp f 0 IYI
{25.10}
=
i/
J e;•·Y cp( Jyl)dy = J;�:�n�;2 J0 ,P(p)pn/2 Jn/2- 1 (p Jz l) dp for any function
{25.11}
Rn
00
{25.12} J0 pn- 1 {1 p)
00
oo .
N
J0 ¢J(p}pn-l dp J eipx ·q do-. By {25.9} and Poisson's formula (2. 5 2} we have J IYI
e ix ·y
S n- 1
{25.13) {25.10}. Since I v(P) I � c/..jP as p -+ the limit of the right-hand {25.10} exists as N -+J provided that {25.12} is satisfied. This yields
which yields side in
(25.11)
. •
oo,
oo
486
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
It is of particular interest in the context of this book to remark that the n-dimensional Fourier transform of a radial function can be represented via the one-dimensional Fourier transform by means of fractional (generally speaking) integra-differentiation. For this purpose we introduce the designation 00
(F.
-oo
for a radial function
Lemma 25.11 • Let
(25.12) be satisfied. X
Then
(25.14)
_
;co .r •
1r
7r
c.p
_
I
=
00
R"-1
The passage to polar coordinates in the inner integral gives
<,O(z) = I Sn - 2 1 J ,i l z l {•d6 J (Vp• + er) pn - 2 dp 00
00
0
- oo
00
00
'P
= IBn - 2 1 J eilxi{I cle1 J t
§ 25.
RIESZ FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
487
We shall need the Lizorkin space of test functions which is adapted to Riesz integra-differentiation. This sp().Ce, unlike its variant for partial and mixed fractional Liouville derivatives (see § may be defined as consisting of functions with Fourier transforms vanishing not on the coordinate planes, but at the origin only. Namely, let
24.9 ),
(25.15) 0, Iii = 0, 1, 2, . . . }. (Compare this with the definition of this space in § 24. 9 , which is considerably more restrictive than (25.15)). The function tP (x ) = exp(- lxl 2 - lxl - 2 ) is an example of a function in the space (25.15). Let us consider now the space � , consisting of 'I = { tJI (x) : tP E S(R") , (vi tP) (O ) =
Fourier transforms of functions in
'I :
� = .1"('1) = { cp (x)
:
E S(R"),
(25.16)
consists of those and only those Schwartzian functions
This allows a simple characterization: the space �
j � cp(x)dx = 0,
Iii =
R•
0, 1, 2, . .
.
(25.17)
[2, 208] - that the Fourier transform
Indeed, it is known - Gel'fand and Shilov p. maps the Schwartzian space S onto itself and
j � cp(x)dx = i- lil j (ix)i cp(x)eiz·O dx = i- lil (vi
R•
R•
(25.15).
according to Thus � is the subspace of Schwartzian functions, for which all the moments equal zero. The space � may be equipped with the topology of the space S(R"), which makes � a complete space. We shall consider generalized functions on � (and on 'I as well) in order to justify some of our operations. We recall that the Fourier transform of a generalized function f E �' ) is defined as a functional j = .1"f, introduced by the rule
(
(j, tJI) = (/, .(/J), tJ1 E 'I .
(25.18)
This definition is correct, since F(w) = � and the Fourier transform is a continuous operation in the topology of the Schwartz space S(R") - Gel'fand and Shilov
(2,
488 p.
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
208]. If
g
is a functional in
w', the relation
(25.18') serves similarly as a definition of the Fourier transform for a functional g E The function lzl-o as an element of the space functional (lzl-o , ,p) = f lzl-o,P(z)dz for all a E
Iii = 0, 1, 2,
n. n.
R"
.
. . However, it is a nonregular functional
w'
w' .
the regular 1C generates since (Vi ,P)(O) = 0, an element of S' or ' if
as
Rea � For such a it will be understood in the sense of regularization achieved by the analytical continuation of the functional (lzl-o, ,P) from the half-plane Rea < The latter is given by means of the equation
(25.19) n =F 0, 2, 4, . . . where cp E S(Rn )), m > Re a - n -1 and Ci = 7rn / 2 2 1 - 2i [i!f(i + n/2)] - 1 • This yields the direct realization of the analytic continuation of the functional (lzl-o, cp) in the half-plane Rea < m + n + 1. We have already dealt with such a regularization in the one-dimensional case - see (5. 6 8). Equation {25.19) is derived in a standard way by subtracting the Taylor sum a-
and taking the relation
into account. The latter can be verified directly by use of the relation
{25.20)
§ 25. In the cases
RIESZ FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTtATION
489
a - n = 2k, k = 0, 1, 2, . . . , excluded in (25.19), we set (25.21)
by definition.
(25.19) may be represented in a simpler form as i cp)(O)xi cp(x) - li i�[ReL:a)-n J�(V 1 · (25.22) dz (_l z_la ' cp) = R"f lxl a with m = [Rea] - n chosen here (if Re a > n); this, however, has to exclude the values Rea = n,n + 1,n + 2, . . . . Remark 25.1. The functional defined by (25.19) is an analytic function with respect to a for all a E C1 (since it is possible to choose m as large as required; it is evident that the right-hand side of (25.19) does not depend on this choice) except the points a = aA: = n + 2k, k = 0, 1, 2, . . As for the points aA: , the functional (25.19) has a first order pole there and admits the representation 1 (25.23) (� x a ' cp) = (ga , cp) + a - a�c ( A cp)(O), I where ( ga , cp ) is a function analytic in the neighbourhood of the point a�c and 1 lim ( g a , cp) = ( (25.24) 1 1 a., , cp) . The regularization
.
CA:
--
a-a�o
A:
X
25.2. The Riesz potential and its Fourier transform. Invariant Lizorkin space
(25.2)
Arguing formally for the moment we see that operation is to be realized as a convolution (in a generalized meaning) of a function f with the function .r- 1 ( 1 zl -a ). Let us evaluate this function first, treating the Fourier transform in the sense of generalized functions. It is convenient to use the Lizorkin space as a test function space.
(25.16)
Lemma 25.2.
The Fourier transform of the function lxl -a , interpreted according
490
CHAPTER
5.
INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
to (25.18'), is given by the relation
(25.25) where 6 = 6(z) is the Dirac delta-function, k = 0, 1, 2, . .. , the constant "Yn (a) being equal to
2k, a =/= -2k, (25.26) -2k, 2k.
a ;/; n + Q= a=n+
Proof.
lz l - a 1)/2 ( ) p a.
is a locally integrable function. We shall use Let Rea < n. Then Bochner's formula to compute the Fourier transform of this function. Let us assume first that ( n + < Rea < n , so that the condition is then satisfied for the function
(25.11)
F(l z l - a ) = lzla - n J,
(25.11)
(25.12)
00
where
J = (27rt/ 2 J P-a+n/2 Jn/ 2- 1 (p )dp. 0
We use the equation
(25.27) (2.52)
(known as Weber integral and obtained by substituting the Poisson integral into the left-hand side of and then interchanging the order of integration). �) , which means that we have proved the first So J = line in in the case ( n + < Rea < n. For the remaining values of a the Fourier transform of the function will be interpreted in the sense of In accordance with we are to show that
(25.27) (27r) nl 2 2 -a+n/2 r ( n;a) /f ( (25.25) 1)/2 lz l-a (25.18' )
1 = ' ;:��� ( lx l� a �) ( lx 1 a ' if>) ' E �, a ;/; n + 2k, a ;/; - 2k.
(25.18' ). (25.28)
§ 25.
RIESZ FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
491
This is true for ( n + 1) /2 < Rea < n since the first line has already been proved for such values. The left-hand side in (25.28) is interpreted1 as (25.19) if Rea � 0. The right-hand side is defined and1 analytic for all a E C since if; E The left-hand side is analytic for all a E C except perhaps the points a = -2k and a = n + 2k, where it has removable singularities: we see that (lz la-n ,
A
Q -
A
A
A
A
(25.30) since (l x l a.,-n ,
= ln2 + Hr' ( l ) + r' (� )1r ( � ) + � �] , 1
cr1
= n+ 2k.
492
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
This may be easily seen from the arguments in (25.29) and (25.30). Thus the operation - 1 lzl-aF is to be realized as the convolution with the function (25.25). In the case Rec:r > 0 this function is locally summable and the corresponding convolution is the lliesz potential (21.1) except for the values c:r = n, n 2 , n 4, . . . In the excluded cases we are to take the logarithmic factor into account according to (25.25). Thus we define the lliesz potential for all c:r, Rec:r > 0, as the convolution .r
+
+
la cp =
J ka (z - y)cp(y)dy,
(25.31)
R"
where
c:r - n :/; 0, 2, 4, 6, . . . ,
er - n = 0, 2, 4, 6, . . . ,
(25.32)
and the normalizing constant is given by (25.26). The function ka (z) is known as the Riesz kernel. Passing to polar coordinates in the integral la cp = ['Yn (c:r)r 1 j IYi a- n cp(x - y)dy, c:r - n :/; 0, 2, 4, . . . , R"
we have (25.33)
I.e. we may interpret the Riesz potential as a result of fractional integration of order c:r in the direction of the vector (see (24.39)) followed by integration with respect to In the notation of (24.39) (25.33) has the form u.
u
( n -a ) 2 ) +r 2IatnT = r (!±..2: 27r(n l)/ 2
s
J (Iatn)(z)du
..
UT
•
(25.34)
-1
The Fourier transform of the Riesz potential Ia cp, Re c:r > 0, is reduced to division by lzla : ·
(25.35)
§ 25.
RIESZ FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
493
for functions
+
Ra
1 J ei� · y <,O( y) dy, y)dy = (2?r)" lYl a
E
cl),
(25.36)
R•
which was proved in Lemma 25.2 for x = 0 - see (25.28) - and follows from (25.28) by the invariance of cl) relative to the translation operator. We conclude from (25.35) that The Lizorkin space cl) is invariant relative to the Riesz potential 1a and Ia (cf)) = cl) with
Theorem 25.1.
(25.37)
The invariance of the space cl) is readily seen from (25.35) and (25.36): -a since IYI <,O(y) E \) fora any a and
Remark 25.3. The lliesz potential does not necessarily vanish rapidly at infinity even if
(Ia
J dO' J1 p"- 1 (p2 - pO' .
Sa- l
�
� J dO' J1 pn- 1 (p2 Sa- l
Remark 25.4.
0
0
+
X+
lxl 2 ) (a - n )/2 dp
l x 1 2 )( a- n )/ 2 dp � c1 1 x l a- n .
The choice of the Lizorkin space cl) is essential for writing the
494
CHAPTER
5.
INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
semigroup property (25.37) for all a and {3 with Rea > 0 and Re {3 > 0. In the case of functions
(25.38)
R•
a > 0, {3 > 0,
a + {3 <
n,
for any unit vector e, l ei = 1. We observe also that (25.39)
Thisiaresult is a paraphrase of the assertion k (a) = la l -a . The lliesz potential of e ·y is a conventionally convergent integralaif 0 < a < (n + 1)/2. In the case a � (n + 1)/2 it is to be interpreted as the analytic continuation in the parameter a.
25.3. Mapping properties of the operator Lp (Rn ) and Lp (Rn ; p)
ra
in the spaces
First of all we remark that the operator Ia is defined for functions
J IYia-n
IYi a- n
l!!l > l
l!!l < l
The existence of the first integral here for almost all z E R:' may be established by showing that it belongs locally to L by using the Minkowsky inequality, while the second one exists for all z, if 1 p
Let 1 � p � oo, 1 � q ::5 oo and a > 0. The operator 1a bounded from Lp (Rn ) into L9(Rn ) if and only if
Theorem 25.2.
0 < a < n, 1 < p < -an , -q1 = p-1 - -an
is
(25.40)
§ 25.
RIESZ FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
495
We omit the proof of this theorem as well as of other statements of this subsection. See the references in § 29.1. A simple way to reduce Theorem 25.2 to the one-dimensional case may be found in § 29.2, note 25.2. The number q = in {25.40) is known as the Sobolev limiting exponent. Later in § 26.7 we shalln��P deal with the Riesz potential of functions
if
o: > 0, 1 < p < oo, 1 < r < oo, o:p- n < 1 < n(p - 1), 1 1 1 J' + n 1 + n ---(25.41) p n < -r -< p ' r = p 0: We observe that Theorem 25.3 contains the "if part" of Theorem 25.2 under the choice 1 = 0, I' = 0 and r =-np(n - o:p)- 1 . We note also a useful particular case 1 = 0, I' = -o:p, r = p in Theorem 25.3: {25.42) I l x l - ap l (Ia
--
--
-
.
R"
which is a generalization of the Hardy inequality (5.45). 1 In the case r = np( n - o:p) there is an extension of Theorem 25.3 to the weights of a general nature. Namely, let p(x) satisfy the so-called Muckenhoupt Wheeden condition
1 I pfiP(x)dx p'' TQi1 I p1 1(1 -P) (x)dx P - 1 $ c < oo, ( IQ I ) ) ( Q
Q
{25.43)
where Q is an n-dimensional cube, IQI being its Lebesgue measure. Theorem 25.4. Let 0 < o: < n, 1 < p < n/o: and q = np/(n - o:p). The operator 1a is bounded from Lp (Rn ;p) into L9(R!';pfiP), if and only if p(x) satisfies the condition {25. 43) with q = np/(n - o:p).
496
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
p
The assertion of the Sobolev theorem does not hold in the case = 1, but a weaker statement is true which is known as a weak type nestimate. Namely, let AJ(t) be the distribution function for a function /(z), z E R : AJ(t) = m { z : 1/(z)l > t } , t > 0.
(25.44)
It is clear that AJ(t) :5 t -P IIfll� with II/II� = J 1/(z) IPdz, the estimate so
R"
(25.45)
is weaker than the estimate liT/11 9 :5 ell/l ip , giving boundedness of the operator T from Lp into L9 • It is in terms of (25.44)-(25.45) that information on the Riesz potential in the Sobolev theorem is changed. Namely, the estimate n q = -n - a,
(25.46)
is valid with 0 < a < n and c not depending on t > 0. We also outline the mapping properties of the Riesz potential operator in the spaces of Holderian functions /(x), x E R,n , where R,n is a compactification of]Rn by the unique point at infinity. To guarantee existence of the Riesz potential 01t.p of a Holderian function it is necessary for t.p( x) to be zero at x = oo and it will be convenient to achieve this by means of a weight. Let where H>. (R' n )
_ _
{ f(x) .. f(x) E C(R' n ), 1/{z + h) - /{x) l :5
( cf. (1.5) and (1.6)).
clh l >.
(1 + l x l )>.(1 + lx + h i ) >. }
Let also
H�CRn ; p) = {/ : I E H\Rn ; p), pflx=o = Pflx =oo = 0}.
The space H>.(Rn ; p) is equipped with the natural norm, which makes it a Banach space.
Let 0 < a < 1 and ;\ + a < 1. The operator ]01 maps the space H>.(R,n ; (1 + lzl 2 ) (n + a)/ 2 ) isomorphically onto the space n>. +a (Rn ; (1 + lxl 2 ) (n -a)/ 2 )
Theorem 25.5.
§ 25.
497
RIESZ FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
and the space H6Ckn ; lz i.B ( + x 2 ) "1 2 ) onto the space H6Ckn ; lz i .B ( if a + A < {3 < n + A and a - {3 < x < n - A - {3.
l
l
+ x 2 ) -a+ "l 2 ),
We omit the proof and note only that it is obtained by mapping the space via the stereographic projection. It is worth observing that the lliesz potential lacp is transformed thereby into a similar potential (up to the weights) over the sphere, i.e. over a compact set in the usual metric, where the Holder property is established by direct estimation - see Vakulov (1, 2). We conclude this subsection by some simple relationships between Riesz potentials and one-dimensional fractional integrals of the Liouville type. For this purpose we need the Poisson and Gauss- Weierstrass integrals R,n onto the unit sphere Sn c nn+ l
(P,cp)(x) =
j P(y, t)cp(x - y)dy,
t > 0,
(25.47)
R•
(W,cp)(x) = j W(y, t)cp(x - y)dy, t > 0,
(25.48)
R"
where (25.49)
is the Poisson kernel and ( 25.50 )
is
the Gauss-Weierstrass kernel.
The Riesz potential l01cp, t.p E Lp(Rn ), 1 < p < nfa, admits of the representations
Theorem 25.6.
Wcp){z) = r (�l t a -' ( P. cp)(z)dt 00
j 0
=
r
00
(l!!)2 j t'l' - 1 (W,cp)(z)dt. 0
(25.51)
498
CHAPTER
5.
INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
Moreover, the relationships
(P1la
(25.52) (25.53)
are valid, where the operators I� and 1�/ 2 apply with respect to the variable T. Proof. Substituting the representations (25.47) and (25.48) for P1
=
25 .4. Riesz differentiation (hypersingular integrals)
By Lemma 25.2 Riesz differentiation (- �)a/2 f = .r- 1 lzl- a-a.1'/, Rea > 0, is to be realized as a convolution with the generalizedn function l zl n . Such a convolution, i.e . an integral with the kernel lz - Yl -a- , in contrast to the Riesz potential has n R an order of singularity higher than the dimension of the space and so it will be called a hypersingular integral. Such an integral diverges and our convolution needs to be properly defined. Let at first 0 < a < 1 (or 0 < Rea < 1). We can guarantee convergence of the convolution of the function lzl - n-a (with sufficiently good functions) introducing it as so
(25.56) J IY - zln+a y - j f(x) IYi- nf(x+a - y) y. This integral converges if 0 < a < 1 for bounded differentiable functions and may be considered as a multidimensional analogue of the Marchaud derivative (5.58). An extension to the case a � 1 may be given either in terms of regularization,
f(y) - f(x) d
Rn
_
_
Rn
d
§ 25.
RIESZ FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
499
using Taylor sums as in (25.19) and (25.22), or by taking finite differences. We have already considered both approaches in the one-dimensional case while dealing with the Marchand fractional derivative of the order a 2:: 1 - see (5.68) and (5.80). To realize the Riesz derivative we shall use the approach via finite differences as more preferable although equivalent, generally speaking, to the former (see § 26.5, where the equivalence is shown for good functions in the more general case). Let us define finite differences (��l)(x) of a function l(x) of many variables with a vector step h. Let Th be a translation operator: ( rh l)(x) = l(x - h),
x,
h E R" .
We shall deal both with centered differences ( 25.57)
(with a vector step h and center x) and with non-centered differences (��l)(x) = ( E - Th ) 1 I
=
t.( -1 . (!) /(:• - kh). )
( 25.58 )
To avoid complications in writing we use the notation (��l)(x) for both types of differences, specifically mentioning the choice of difference when it is essential. We consider both types of differences because it will not always be possible to use just one type of difference - see § 26.4 below. Thus the realization of the operation ( -�Y)il 2 , a > 0, is expected to be given in the form of the hypersingular integral (25.59)
where the normalizing constant dn,r(a) will be chosen so that na I would not
500
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DWFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
depend on l, only if l > a. The construction (25.60)
will be called a truncated hypersingular integral. We find it convenient to have also the designation for the integral (25.59) without normalizing constant: (25.61)
The next section is devoted to a more detailed investigation of the hypersingular integrals (25.59) and of more general constructions. Here we dwell only on the main fact that the hypersingular integrals (25.59) is indeed the Riesz derivative in the sense that (25.62)
under the appropriate choice of the normalizing constant dn (a) in (25.59). ,
Lemma 25.3.
the relation
t
The Fourier transform of the integral T01 f with l > a is given by (25.63)
where
dn ,t(a) = J (1 - e it 1 )1 l t l -n -01 dt
in the case when (�� /)(z)
is
R•
(25.64)
a non-centered difference and
dn , t(a) = J (eiy 1 / 2 - e -iy 1 / 2 )1 IYI - n -01 dy = 21 -01 i 1 J sin1 Y1 IYI - n -01 dy, (25.65) R•
R•
when the difference is centered. Proof.
Let �01f be the integral (25.26) truncated in (25.60). Let the difference as
§ 25. .6.�/
501
RIESZ FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
be centered. Then
i.e.
(1 eix·y )l dy. IY!n +a _
(25.66) J IYI > e It is easily shown that passage to the limit is possible here (in the sense of L2 , for example) , so A
:F(Te01 f) = f(x)
(25.67)
after the dilatation change of variables y = lx l - 1 e. We make also another change variables:
of
(25.68)
where wx('l) is any rotation in Rn , which transforms the first coordinate vector e1 = (1, 0, . . . , 0) into the unit vector xf l x l . It is clear that lei = 1 '7 1 and e � = '1 . e = '71 , so .
1
which transforms (25.67) into (25.63)-(25.64). Similar arguments are to be used in the case of a centered difference. Equation (25.63) yields (25.62) after division by d (a). However, we have to be cautious because of the possibility that the constantn,ldn,l (a) is zero for some a. In the case of the centered difference the question is easy: the normalizing constant dn ,l (a) equals zero identically (for all a) if I is odd and it is certainly different from zero if I is even, this being seen from (25.65). Thus the construction T01 is identically zero: T01 f 0 in the case of a centered difference of an odd order. Consequently, a centered difference is to be taken of even order I = 2, 4, 6, . . . only and then the passage from (25.63) to (25.62) is possible for all a, 0 < a < I. •
=
an
502
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
The question regarding the non-vanishing of dn ,l(c.t) in the case of non-centered difference is more difficult, and it will be considered in § 26, where the detailed investigation of hypersingular integrals is discussed. It will be shown, in particular, that dn,I (c.t) as a function of c.t vanishes at the integer points of the interval (0, l). We formulate a corollary of Lemma 25.3. Corollary. The normalizing constant being given by the formulae (25.64) or (25.65) {in the case when it does not vanish}, the hypersingular integral n cr f does not depend on the choice of l, l > c.t. In conclusion of this subsection we give the relations 00
1- j t - 1 -cr ( E - Pt )1 fdt, ncr I = x(c.t, l)
0 < Q < l,
(25.69)
0
ncr/ = X (�1 , l) j t - 1 - !f (E 00
0
W,
t ) 1 /dt 0 < c.t < l,
(25.70)
1
similar to (25.51), where x(c.t, l) is the constant (5.81), while P,f and Wt f are the Poisson and Gauss-Weierstrass integrals (25.47)-(25.48). In the case of "good" functions these relations are derived from (25.52) and (25.53) by inverting the on_e-dimensional operators I� and I�/2 in terms of the Marchand fractional derivative (5.57) with further passage to the limit as t 0. Relations (25.69) and (25.70) may be considered as realization of (5.85) under the concrete choice of a semigroup T, in (5.85). Relation (25.69) is herein a realization of the fractional power (.J=K)cr, while (25.70) gives the fractional power (-A) cr/2 . -+
25.5. Unilateral Riesz potentials
We call integral operators (n/2) Cn- 1 j Y�n tp(x =f y)dy, Cn = r7rn/2 crl.r. tp = r(c.t) ' IYi R"+
R!'
(25.71)
unilateral Riesz potentials. Here x = (x , . . . , x ) E and integration is carried out over the half-space R+ = { x x E1 Xnn > 0}. Since y� I Y I -n I Y i cr-n , the operators (25.71) are similar in a sense to the Riesz potential Icrtp, being in particular bounded from Lp into L9, q = npf(n - c.tp), with 1 < p < nfc.t. The integrals ±tp are immediate generalizations of Liouville fractional integrals (5.4), coincidingI with them if n = 1. That is why we keep to the same notation for these objects. As in the one-dimensional case we shall call potentials If. tp and I� tp left and right-hand sided respectively. We denote x' = (x 1 , . . . , Xn- 1 ) and observe that :
R!' ,
=5
§ 25.
RIESZ FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
503
the constructions (25.71) represent "interlacing" of one-dimensional fractional integration and the Poisson integral: an
� J u::-' (P 00
J:;_
where
r( )
••
0
(25.72)
(Py,.
W
>
c)
W
c).
'f
R"
R"
(25.74)
Proof. We denote Cn - 1 (zn )±a lzl - n e - e Jz ,.J ka± ,£ (z) = r(a ) =
e l n ) a_ ± l e - lz ra l p(z' , l zn I ) , ) r( a_(z
where P(z', lzn l ) is the Poisson kernel (25.49): we have ki,: (e) = (.1"z ,..1"z' k% ,e )(e) = rta; j0 z�- l e- z,.(e+ le'l =fi{,.) dzn . Relation (7 .5) shows that the latter integral equals (e + le' I ien )a under the assumption that arg(e + le' l ien ) = 0 en = 0. Hence By ( 25.54)
=t=
as
=t=
(25.75)
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
504
This yields (25.73)
as
c -+
0, which, in its turn, leads to (25. 74). •
Corollary 1.
Potentials I� possess the semigroup property: I� I� = I±+P .
Corollary 2.
The Riesz potential I01 is representable as a composition of unilateral
potentials:
(25.76) We find now the explicit form of the operators inverse to I�. The desired constructions are to coincide with the Marchaud derivatives D± - see (5.57) in the case 1. We apply formally the Fourier transform Fz' in the variable z' to the relation=(I.+
where the operator I+ is applied with respect to the variable Inverting it by means of the Marchand derivative (5.57), we arrive at . Yn . 1 f(-a)A,(a)
whence after multiplication by e -z.. le'l and application of the inverse Fourier transform F;,1 we finally have IP (z) =
,.7:,�) I r�: ( �� f)(z)dy,
I>
<> ,
R+
where ��/ is the non-centered difference (25.58). So Cn - 1 (I±a ) - 1 / = x(a, l)
I yIYi;;na (�I±y f)( )dy�Da± /, I > a . x
R+
(25.77)
The integrals in (25.77) are hypersingular. It is not difficult to show that for f E S( Rn ) they converge (conventionally) in the sense that D±f = elim -o D± 'e f,
§ 26. HYPERSINGULAR INTEGRALS AND RIESZ POTENTIALS
where
505
00
D t. f = :(:,'I) j
j j�: (��. f)(z)dy . The constructions D±f are identical with Marchand fractional derivatives if = 1. This was the reason for keeping the same notation as in the one-dimensional case. We also note that <JJit)(e) = (le'l =F ien )a i(e) . £ R•- l
n
§ 26. Hypersingular Integrals and the Space of Riesz Potentials
We now go on to a more detailed consideration of the hypersingular integral (26.1)
defined in § 25. In particular it will be shown that the hypersingular integral generates a "true" inverse to the Riesz potential when the latter is considered within the framework of the spaces Lp. We shall clarify what advantage the centered or non-centered form of a finite difference has in the definition of the/hypersingular integral. Further, hypersingular integrals, more general than , will be considered. They prove to be a natural extension of partial differential operators into the case of fractional orders, since any homogeneous partial differential operator with constant coefficients may be represented as a hypersingular-type integral, as will be demonstrated in § 26.6. A special role in this section is assigned to §n 26.7, where the space Ia (Lp) of Riesz potentials is investigated, the spaces L;,r (R ) , generalizing Sobolev fractional spaces L;(Rn ), aare considered and the relationship between the spaces L;,r (R") and the space I (Lp) is established. We note the relation na
(26.2)
as one of the main results. 26. 1 . Investigation of the normalizing constants functions of the parameter
as
a
dn ,1 (a)
As it was made clear at the end of § 25, we have first of all to answer the question about the zeros of the function dn,l (a) used in (26.1). We find them in this subsection and at the same time we give representations of the integrals (25.64) and (25.65) via elementary functions of the parameter a.
506
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
We introduce the following functions of the parameter a: incentered the casediffoference, the non incentered the casediffoference, the
(26.3)
in terms of which the constants dn,l(a) will be expressed. Here I = 1, 2, . . The former of these functions is familiar to the reader from the one-dimensional case, where it arose in the process of the evaluation of the normalizing constant for the Marchand fractional derivative of order a � 1 see (5.73) and (5.80). We considered there the Marchand derivatives with non-centered differences only. The latter of the functions (26.3) in the case of even I = 2, 4, . . may be represented also as . .
-
.
A:'( a) =
t.(- l) k- 1 G) �� - ki a
(26.4)
The right-hand side here is identically zero in the case of an odd I and so it differs then from AI'( a). The function AI( a), a E R1 , vanishes at the points a = 1, 2, 3, 1 1 and nowhere else. The function A�'(a) has even integers a = 2, 4, 6, . . . , I 2 as zeros in the case of an even I and odd integers a = 1, 3, 1 2 in the case of an odd I. Lemma 26.1. . . . ,
-
-
. . .
,
-
Proof. We consider A, (a) = AI(a) first. Let us use the relation 1 1 f Al(a) = r(1 - a) (I -lne )'(26.5) l e l cw cJe, a < I, obtained § 5 - see (5 .81 ) . It is readily seen from (26.5) that in the case a < I the function AI(a) vanishes only at the poles'of the gamma-function: a = 1, 2, . . , l - 1. If a = I, we have Al(a) #; 0 by (5.74 ). Let a > I. The recurrence relation Al+ 1 (a + 1) = Al+ 1 (a) - Al(a) holds, and this is verified by definition (26.3). It1,!1is then not difficult to show by induction that for a > I, Al(a) > 0 if I is odd and A/(a) < 0 if I is even. Thus AHa) #; 0 for a > I also. Let now A,(a) = Al'(a). Using (26.4) we conclude that if a is an integer and has the same parity as I, then I
in
0
.
§ 26. HYPERSINGULAR INTEGRALS AND RIESZ POTENTIALS
507
(26.6) - (p-dpd ) a ( pV"P1 ) I Ip=l = A"1 ( a) for an integer a of the same parity as I. Hence the proof of Lemma for A�'(a) follows. Remark 26.1. Lemma 26.1 answers the question about the zeros of the function A1 (a) = Aaa). In some problems related to hypersingular integrals (Samko [31, p.l40]) it is of importance to be sure of the absence of other zeros of the quasipolynomial A1 ( z) in the complex plane except at the points z = 1, 2, . . . , I - 1. This question is open. Theorem 26.1. The normalizing constants dn ,l (a) in (26.1) are analytic functions of the parameter a and are given by the relations dn ,l (a) = .Bn (a) sm. A,(a) (26.7) (a1r/2) , (26.8) Pn (a) = 2ar (1 ?rl +i)n/r2 (�) except for the case of a centered difference of an odd order I, when dn ,l(a) 0. The constant d,. ,, (a) is different from zero for all a > 0 in the case of a centered difference and of an even I, while in the case of a non-centered difference it vanishes for a > 0 if and only if a = 1,3,5, . . . , 2[1/2] - 1. Proof. We begin with the remark that A, (a) = 0 for an even integer a by Lemma 26.1, thus A,(a)/sin(a?r/2) in (26.7), in the case a = 2,4,6, . . . , is to be understood as he-.ma sm. A,(e) (26.9) (e 12) - � ( 1) a/2 .!!._da A1 (a). Evaluating the integral (25.64) in the case of a non-centered difference, we have dn ,,(a) = j (1 - eiY t ) ' dyt j ( IYI2 yn -
--
•
+
=
_
7r
_
7r
+
+
Rl
R•- t
508
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
We find the value of the integral over Rn - l by changing to polar coordinates: J (1 + I TJI 2 ) -(a+n)f2dTJ = I Sn - 2 1 J pn- 2 (1 + p2 ) -(n+a)f2 dp 00
R• - 1
0
� ISn- 2 1 J r
=
0
"
2
Since
2
2
(26.11)
we have
2 ) - (o+n)/ 2 d'l = .-(n - ll/ 2 r ( 1 � '1 1 + 1 J (l
R• - 1
So
"'
) (n ; a) . /f
I
Let 0 < a < 1. Using the relation kL=O( - 1)k (!) = 0 and the equation (26.12)
derived from (7 .6), we transform the remaining integral to 1 k ( ) oo - 1- a 1 L ( - 1) k' J t ( cos kt - 1)dt = � L (-l)k-1 ( k' ) k Joo t -a sin kt dt k=O k =O o 1rA1 (a) _ - 2f ( l + a ) sin ( a 7r / 2) 1
0
§ 26. HYPERSINGULAR INTEGRALS AND RIESZ POTENTIALS
509
which gives the value of dn ,t (a) presented in (26.7). For other values of a � 1 the required result is easily obtained by analytical continuation in a. In the case of a centered difference and of an even l we obtain (26.13) dn ,l (a) - (-1)1/2 2'- a+ 1 7rr(n(-n1+2)/a2)r (�) joo sint 1 +'at dt similar to (26.10). We make use of the formula 1/2 A: 1 ( l ) 1 1 1 sin t = 2 �( -1) - 112 k ( 1 - cos 2kt) which is simply obtained by expanding sin1 t as a Fourier series in cos kt on the interval [0, 1r]. Using this result and integrating by parts yields 0
_
7r2a- l 1/2 -1 A:- 1 ( l ) ka = r(1 a)sin(a + 7r/2) �( ) l/2 - k in the case 0 < a < 2. It is ea.Sily seen that So
(26.14)
(26.14) is transformed to 00
sm+ t dt - ( 1)112 2a -1- 1 A1 (a) (26.15) r(1 + a) sin(a 7r/2) ' J t1 a Substituting this expression into (26.13) we obtain (26.7) after simple transforma tions. The required result for values a � 1 is obtained by analytic continuation in respect to l The identity dn,l ( ) 0 in the case of a non-centered difference and of an odd is readily seen from (25.65). •
I
_
_
0
a.
a =
510
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
It remains to elucidate the question concerning the vanishing of d ,z(a). The case of centered difference is clear in view of (25.65). So let then difference be non-centered. By (26.7) the question is reduced to that of the zeros of the function Az(a) = A:(a), which were found in Lemma 26.1. Zeros of this function, being a = 1, 2, 3, . . . , I - 1, are prime according to (26.5). So dn,z(a) :/; 0 for a = 1, 2, 3, . . . in correspondence with (26.9). We give also explicit values of dn ,z(a) for even a: a
•
(26.16) (26.17) Q = 2, 4, 6, . . . ,
in the cases of non-centered and centered differences, respectively. Thus, the normalizing constant dn,l(a) being chosen in correspondence with a (25.64), (25.65) and (26.7), (26.1) properly defines the operators n I according to Theorem 26.1, in all cases except the case when the difference is non-centered and a = 1, 3, 5, . . . In this case dn,l(a) = 0 and we come across the phenomenon of "annihilation" of the construction (25 .61): Ta l = 0, a = 1, 3, 5, · · · < I,
(26.18)
if a non-centered difference is used. So a non-centered difference has, on the one hand, an advantage in that its order is not necessarily even. (The requirement to choose I even means that we are in general to take I greater, which is undesirable). On the other hand a non-centered difference leads to the non-desirable effect (26.18) in the case a = 1, 3, 5, . . . We shall consider this special case in § 26.2. .
26.2. Convergence of the hypersingular integral for smooth functions and diminution of order l to l > 2[a/2] in the case of a non-centered difference
Let us show that the hypersingular integral (26.1) converges absolutely for functions l (z), which have bounded partial derivatives of order [a] + 1. For definiteness we consider the case of a non-centered difference.
§ 26.
HYPERSINGULAR INTEGRALS AND RIESZ POTENTIALS
511
The relation ( AL /)(z) = m
;E b l =m
. 1
I
o
k =O
�� j (1 - u)m - l ;E(- l)m -k km (!)
(26.19)
is valid, where hi = h{1 h�· . We have given its proof in the one-dimensional case - (5.75). In the case of many variables it is proved in a similar fashion by means of the Taylor expansion for functions of many variables with the remainder in the integral form. We conclude from (26.19) that • • •
l(�i f)(z)l � cl h l m
�eR•sup l(vi f)(z)l
lil = m
=
c 1 l h lm , 1 2:: m.
(26.20)
We readily obtain from (26.20) that the integral (26.1) converges absolutely if function f(z) and all its derivatives (Vi f)(x), Iii = [a) + 1, are bounded. We show now that the hypersingular integral (26.1) converges conventionally for I > 2(a/2] in the case of a non-centered difference. In other words, the integer I may be chosen not necessarily greater than a, but as the odd integer which is the nearest to a. We consider I to be odd, since if I is even and I > 2(a/2], then I > a. The following directly verified relation a
(26.21)
is valid, where the function �(T) = !(T - 1)1 (T + l)T- (1+ 1)/ 2 is anti-invariant . relative to the inversion, i.e . P,( T- 1 ) = -�( T) . Equation (26.21) generates the corresponding identity in finite differences ( � /)(z) = ( � /)(z) -
� (A�+ l f)(z + ky) - � (A�+ 1 f) (z + 1 � 1 y) ,
(1 - 1)/ 2
(26.22)
512
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
where the function (P� I)(z) is odd in y. Then the limit (l- 1)/ 2 j (Al+ 1 l)(z + k y) d .hm (A'11 l)(z) y y d = � + n J cr IYi IYi n+ cr � k- 1 R" IYI>� � -o
-
11
(26.23)
exists, since l+ 1 > a, which yields the conventional convergence ofthe hypersingular integral ncr 1. We return now to the phenomenon of the annihilation (26.18) of the hypersingular integral of odd order with a non-centered difference. Since l > 2(a/2] is allowed, we may avoid this phenomenon by choosing l = a in the case a = 1, 3, 5, . . . Then At(l) ;/; 0 and the definition of a hypersingular integral by (26.1) with l = a = 1, 3, 5, . . . becomes proper. It should be stressed, however, that conventional convergence in this case is essential even for the very good functions. .
Everywhere below we assume that l > a and l is even in the case of a non-centered difference and l > 2(a/2] in the case of a non-centered difference with the obligatory choice l = a in the case a = 1, 3, 5, . . . . However, in § 26.4 while generalizing the hypersingular integral (26.1) we shall allow odd l in the case of a
centered difference too. The following lemma is close to (25.34).
The Riesz differentiation ( -A) cr/ 2 = n cr can be interpreted as a result of a fractional differentiation in an arbitrary direction u, l u i = 1, with the posterior integration in respect to u: Lemma 26.2.
Da / = - f(- a�:�";�"/2)
J (V;:f)(z)du,
s,._ l
(26.24)
where fJn (a) is the constant (26.8), (V�f)(x) is the fractional derivative (24.38) (24.38') in the direction u and ncr I is taken with a non-centered difference.
The proof is obtained by changing to polar coordinates. 26.3. The hypersingular integral as an inverse of a Riesz potential
The hypersingular integral (26.1) generates an operator mverse to the Riesz potential 1cr cp:
(26.25)
§ 26. HYPERSINGULAR INTEGRALS AND RIESZ POTENTIALS cp
513
for sufficiently good functions, e.g. E �(Rn ), which is obvious via Fourier transforms, see (25.35) and (25.62). We shall show that the inversion (26.25) is true on the whole domain of the Riesz potential within the frames of Lp-spaces: cp(x) E Lp(R), 1 � p < nfo:. It is important to stress here that the hypersingular integral na applies to functions 1a which are not "very good" and so it will not be, in general, absolutely convergent. It will be interpreted as conventionally convergent in Lp: (26.26)
where D� f is the truncated hypersingular integral (25.60). We introduce certain auxiliary functions, which are finite differences of the Riesz kernel ka(x). Namely, let us define the function (26.27) where o: > 0, l = 1, 2, 3, . . . and single out the case h = e1 = (1, 0, . . . , 0), setting (26.28) so that (26.29) kz , a (z ) = 'Yn �a) �{-1)1 (!) i z - .l:et la-n if o: - n =F 0, 2, 4, . . and a non-centered difference is chosen. An important role in our consideration will be played by the kernel .
K:
z a { l z l ) = dn ,l (�) l z ln J kz, a ( Y)dy. IYI < I�I ,
(26.30)
Since ka(x) = lx l - a by (25.25), the Fourier transform of the function (26.27) is given by the expression fordifference a non-centered (26.31) for a centered difference. The function �l,a ( h) may be expressed in terms of k1,a (x) by means of the x,
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
514
rotation: (26.32)
where l > a - n in the case a - n = 0, 2, 4, . . . . Here Wz (h) is the rotation (25.68). Equation (26.32) is verified directly by means of the equality lz - ketl = llzlet - kJirl, which yields the relation jy�w;1(h) - ketl = lhl-1lz - khl if we take into account that In lhl kL:=O(- 1)k {!) lz - kh la- n 0 in the case a - n = 0, 2, 4, 6, . . . and l > a - n. l
=
The function kt, a (x) satisfies the estimate
Lemma 26.3.
lkt, a (x) l � c(1 + l x l )a- n - l as lx l � l + 1,
(26.33)
kt, a (x) E Lq (Rn ), 1 - a:fn < 1/q � 1
(26.34)
J kt,a (x)dx = 0.
(26.35)
so that if l > a. Besides R•
Equation (26.35) is valid in the case 2[a/2] < l � a too, if l is odd, the difference in (26.28) is non-centered and the integral in (26.35) is interpreted as lim J kt,a (z)dx. N-oo
lz - !e•I< N
We denote W(s) = ka (x + set ) , s E R1 , so that kt,a (x) = (�� W)(O). By the known relation Proof.
(�� W )(s) =
e
e
J ... J 0
w ( l > (s - St
-
. . . - s,)ds l · · . ds,
(26.36)
0
(J
we obtain kl,a (x) = w<1> ( -0), 0 < < I, whence the estimate (26.33) is easily derived, the inequalities l b
p
cp
k- l
p
§ 26.
HYPERSINGULAR INTEGRALS AND RIESZ POTENTIALS
{26.35), i. e . the relation k, , a (O) = 0 follows from {26.31) if I > a.
515
Further
Changing the index in the second sum by I - we see that it differs from the first one by the factor (-1 )1 • So v
v
j
lx - !e 1 I
for all N > 0 in the case of an odd I. Lemma 26.4. The estimates
I X:l, a { l x l ) l $ C
kl, a (x)dx = 0
{26.37)
•
{ lxlmin(a-n,O) , In 1 rzr ,
IX:l, a { lxl)l $ clx l a - n - l• '
a =F n, a = n, lxl $ 1 ,
{26.38) {26.39)
are valid, where I* = I in all cases when I > a, and I* = I + 1 in the case when 2[a/2] < I $ a and a non-centered difference is used in {26.38). So X: ,, a ( lxl) E L9{R"), 1 - a/n < 1/q $ 1.
Proof.
The verification of {26.38) is obvious. To prove {26.39) we use the property
{26.35) and have
IK I , a (lz l)l = ��n
k:(a) j
IYI>Ixl
l
kl, a (y)dy ::; lzln:l -a ·
If 2[a/2] < I $ a, so that I is odd, the estimate {26.39) may be obtained because {26.37) enables us to carry out the integration not over the ball I YI < lxl, but over the layer lxl - 1/2 < IYI lxl + 1/2. Namely by {26.37) and {26.33) we have for <
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
516
lzl > I + 1:
L(a) l j lkl,a(Y) i dy ( ) a-1 - (lzl - / ) a- 1 1 <- c n lzl l 2 2 lzl I
I KI , a (lzl)l � lzl n i
lzl - � < IYI
+
__
< _
-
C1 1 X � - n+ a- 1 - 1
-
•
•
We now prove the following theorem which is preparatory for the inversion of the Riesz potential Ia
( D: f)(x) = j K1 ,a (lyl)
(26.40 )
R•
Proof. Applying a finite difference to the Riesz potential, we have (d� /)(z) = f a,, a (e , y)
(26.41 )
where d1 ,a (e, y) is the function {26.27). Hence The interchange of the order of integration is possible in view of the absolute convergence in the case of c > 0. We apply (26.32) and make then the change of variables �wi 1 ( y) = z zE Rn , where w; 1 (y) is the rotation inverse to the rotation (25.68). Then I Y I = le l / l l and kl,a ( z )dz .
The dilatation transformation e -+ ce leads now to (26.40).
•
§ 26. HYPERSINGULAR INTEGRALS AND RIESZ POTENTIALS
517
The kernel K,,a ( lyl) has an averaging property:
Remark 26.2.
j Kl,a( lyl)dy = 1.
(26.42)
R"
This relation, being a consequence of the choice of the normalizing constants, is easily established indirectly: let
4>
R"
Corollary. The Fourier transfonn of the kernel K:, , a ( lzl ) is given by the expression
(26.43) being written for the case of the non-centered difference in (26.27)� E 4> (26.40), Off(z) = k.,, a (Ez)Daf(z).
Indeed, taking / in
we have
E = 1 we obtain then (26.43) by (25.66) and (25.62).
limo D� f D a I = e(L p ) potential within the frames of the spaces Lp (Rn ): Theorem 26.3. The operator
Letting
is the left inverse to the Riesz
(26.44)
The way to prove this theorem is provided by Theorem 26.2. Really, by
(26.42) we have
(D: /)(z) -
(26.45)
R"
from (26.40). By the Minkowsky inequality we obtain li D:/ -
(26.46)
where w�(
518
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
by the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem, the application of which is justified by the fact K:z,a ( lyl) E Lt(R"), as proved in Lemma 26.4. Let us emphasize that we have demonstrated the Lp-convergence of the truncated Riesz derivative (hypersingular integral) n:I in the range Ia (Lp) of the Riesz potential and have given an estimate of this convergence in (26.46) . One may show that the convergence also holds almost everywhere. We will not dwell here on this and refer the reader to § 29.2, note 26. 1. In conclusion of this subsection we note that besides the hypersingular integrals, considered above, constructions (25.69) and (25.70), defined the previous section, may be used to invert the Riesz potential with E Lp. Namely, the following theorem is true. Theorem 26.31• Let I = la cp, cp E Lp(R"), 0 < a < n, 1 � p < nfa. Then px cp
cp
=
-
00
lim j t - l -a (E - P,)1 fdt ,
1 l) X( a, e -O
l
cp
in
> a,
t
the limit may be taken under the Lp -norm or almost everywhere.
26.4. Hypersingular integrals with homogeneous characteristics
Generalizing the hypersingular integral (26.1), we introduce the construction given by (D na /)(x) = J (Ll�f)(x) IY in+a n(x , y)dy where we shall call the function O(x, y), not depending on l(x) a characteristic. This follows the terminology accepted in the theory of multidimensional singular integrals (see Mihlin [2]). We shall not consider here the constructions in such a general form, but treat the case when O{x, ) does not depend on x and is homogeneous in y: n = O(y'), y' = Y/ I Y I so that y R"
Dna / = dn,l1( a)
J IY in+a
(Ll�f ) (x )
1
O(y ) dy ,
l
>a
(26.47)
R"
We write the normalizing constant as before in spite of the presence of an arbitrary homogeneous characteristic O(y') in order that D0/ be independent of the choice l > a. See Corollary 1 of the Theorem 26.4. As regards more general characteristics, we refer to the references in § 29. 1 (notes to § 26.4) and to § 29.2 (notes 26.3 and 26.4).
§ 26. HYPERSINGULAR INTEGRALS AND RIESZ POTENTIALS
We note at once that the presence of a characteristic O(y') in the hypersingular integral allows to use this integral with centered differences of an odd order. We shall give a certain classification of hypersingular integrals {26.47) and be concerned with following questions in this section: A) What are the relations giving the Fourier transform of D fi f? B) Under what conditions on O ( y' ) does the convergence in Lp of the hypersingular integral naf with a constant characteristic imply the convergence of the hypersingular integral with the characteristic O(y') and vice versa? In § 26.6 we shall see more clearly what are the hypersingular integrals {26.47). We shall show that the class of such integrals contains, in particular, operators of the form ;:- 1 a:F with a(x) = lxl aa(x'), x' = x/� 1 , being a sufficiently smooth homogeneous function of degree a. In the case of an integer a the class of the operators {26.47) contains all homogeneous differential operators in partial derivatives of order a. First of all we state the following. 519
We shall call the integral {26.47) a hypersingular integral of the neutral type, if it uses a non-centered difference, and a hypersingular integral of the even (or odd) type, if it uses a centered difference of an even order (or odd) respectively. By {26.20) the integral {26.47) converges for l > a in the case of a sufficiently good function f(x) if O(y') E L 1 (Sn - d · For a hypersingular integral of a neutral type and with the even characteristic O( ') = 0( the order of the difference
Definition 26.1.
y
-y')
may be lowered owing to conventional convergence to
(26.48)
l > 2[a/2]
with an obligatory choice l = a in the case a = 1 , 3, 5, . . . . This may be shown following the same lines as in § 26.2. We consider l everywhere below to be chosen as it has been indicated. The neutral type of a hypersingular integral has some advantages in comparison with an even or odd type. This has already revealed itself in the possibility {26.48) to lower the order l. It will prove to be more universal in the problems of inversion of potential type operators. In particular, it makes sense to consider integrals of the even (odd) type for even {odd) characteristics O(y ) only. Namely, if a characteristic is arbitrary: '
n(y') = n+ (Y') + n_ (y') , n± (y') = n(y') 2n(-y') ±
then
D fi/ =: Dfi_ /
{26.49)
520
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
for integrals of the even and odd type respectively. I.e. integrals of the even or odd types are annihilated in the case when the characteristic has an opposite parity. These relations follow for example from {26.69)-{26.71) proved below. On the other hand the hypersingular integrals of neutral type have their own "strangeness" which is reflected in the following remark. Remark 26.3. A hypersingular integral of the neutral type "annihilated" identically: IS
J IYI- n-a (�� f)(x)O(y')dy
Rn
=:
0
for any a = 1, 3, 5, . . . , whatever f and 0 were, if 1 > a. This was established in § 26.1 (see {26.18)), for O(y') = const. For O(y') =F const this annihilation will be obvious in Fourier transforms as seen in {25.68) and {25.69) below. As for the case 1 = a, the hypersingular integral of the neutral type converges conventionally if and only if O(y') is even. This may be seen from the transformations in § 26.2 by substituting the characteristic O(y') into the left-hand side of {26.23). Remark 26.4. In the case of a hypersingular integral of the odd type the normalizing constant dn ,t(a) has not been determined yet. The constant {26.65) equals zero in the case of an odd 1. Starting from {26.7) and taking into account that A�'(a) = 0 for a = 1, 3, 5, . . . by Lemma 26.1, we set by definition dn ,l (a) = f3n (a) cosA"(a) la1l'/2)
{26.50)
for hypersingular integrals of the odd type. We also note that for hypersingular integrals with a homogeneous characteristic, the relation {26.51) D� f = r (- ot�:�"' "/2) J O(u)(V� f)(z ) du Sn - 1
is valid, where (V� /)(x) is the fractional derivative {24.38)-{24.38') in the direction u. This result generalizes {26.24) and is similarly obtained by passage to polar coordinates in {26.47). A) Evaluation of the Fourier transform for D0f. Following the transformations in {25.66)-{25.67), we can easily show that the relation in Fourier transforms F{ Dfi/) = Vn (x) i(x)
{26 . 52)
§ 26. HYPERSINGULAR INTEGRALS AND RIESZ POTENTIALS
is valid, where the function V0(x) is given by the relations fordifference a non-centered
521
(26.53)
We shall call the function V0(x) the symbol of the hypersingular integral D0 f . This follows the terminology accepted in the theory of multidimensional singular integrals - see Mihlin [2]. It is clear that the symbol vg ( ) is homogeneous of order a: X
(26.54) Theorem 26.4.
symbol are valid:
Let !l (u) E L t (Sn - d · The following representations for the
vg (x) = c:(�=�2) V{l(x) = wn (a)
s
j O(u)(-ix · uNr,
s,._ l
j !l(u)lx
.. - 1
V0(x) = -iwn (a)
·
,t
u l a du,
j !l(u) lx
s,. _ l
n
·
1, 3, 5, . . . ,
(26.55) (26.56)
u l a sign ( x u)du, ·
(26.57)
for hypersingular integrals of the neutral, even and odd type respectively, where Wn (a) = r ((n + a)/2)[211'(n - l )/ 2 r (l/2 + a/2)] - l and the designation ( ie ) a = lel a e - i ...; sign e is used in (26.55). In the case of an even characteristic !l (u) (26.55) and (26.56) coincide and are valid for a hypersingular integral of the neutral type of order a = 1 , 3, 5, . . .
Proof. In the case of a non-centered difference we have (26.58)
As the mner integral is analytic m a, it sufficient to calculate it for IS
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
522
0 < a < 1 . Using the identity
L:l ( - 1 ) 1: (!) = 0 we obtain
1::0
where e = X . lT. Integration by parts in the first of the integrals and using (26.12) give
foo (1 0
p
e iP( ) l
1 +a
. (_ ,e) .
1rAHa) dp = f(1 + a ) sm a 1r
a,
a > 0,
I
> a,
(26.59)
which transforms (26.58) into (26.55) in view of (26.7). In the case of a centered difference we arrive at the inner integra.I
I(e) = j
00
1 P- - a
0
t e
(e i- P( - e- P )
'
dp
e = X · O',
similarly to (26.58), ass uming that 0 < a < 1 again. Applying (26.59) we obtain
( I ) [ - (� - ) ] t ( v -1 ( I )� � _ 1 v=O ( )1 I (I )}
1r � -1t- 1 sin a1rf( 1 + a) �(
1rle l a {
1 2f(1 + a) sin( a 1r /2) +
signe 1 cos(a1r/2) .
� �( - 1 )" _ 1
�
11
_1 1
11
)
2
2
11
1
2-
a
11
a
v
11
a
11 2-
sign .
•
L: { - 1)" {!) I � - v i a = 0 if I is odd and L: { - 1)" (!) I � - v i a x v=O v=O "' AI' ( a ) leiOt ·stgn ( 2' - 11) =: 0 1"f I · even, we see th at J(C) , = 2r(l ) sin ( a "'/2) tOr an even an d +a 1 1r iA" a I(IOt sign ( • (e ) = - 2r 1 + a . ( 26.56 - ( 26.57) . • a1r 2) for an odd I, wluch g1ves Noting that
I
l
l
IS
cos
)
r
§ 26. HYPERSINGULAR INTEGRALS AND RIESZ POTENTIALS
523
The hypersingular integrals (26.47) do not depend on the order I of the finite difference under the suggested choice of the normalizing constant.
Corollary 1.
The hypersingular integrals of the neutral and even type coincide in the case of an even characteristic. We also conclude from (26.55)-(26.57) that the hypersingular integral D0/
Corollary 2.
of an integer order a is a homogeneous differential operator in partial derivatives under the proper choice of the type of a hypersingular integral. Namely, the following corollary is true. Corollary 3. The with a = 2, 4, 6, . . .
symbol of a hypersingular integral of the neutral or even type or of the odd type and with a = 1 , 3, 5, . . . is a polynomial
Vna (x) = 26{311" ( a) n
� LJ
-:;. x' 1J"1 = a J
n; .
(26.60)
where 6 = 1 for a hypersingular integral of the neutral and even type and 6 = i for a hypersingular integral of the odd type, n; being spherical moments of the function
O(u) :
n; =
J ui n( )du.
(26.61)
(T
s. - 1
To obtain (26.60) from (26.55)-(26.57), the relation
(x · u)m = is to be used. B ) Convergence characteristics.
of
m' � LJ -;fxJ
.
lil = m
J.
hypersingular
.
u3
integrals
with
different
We wish to answer the following question. Let f ( x ) be such a function that its hypersingular integral converges for a certain characteristic 0 1 (y'). Does then the hypersingular integral of the same function converge in the case of another characteristic 0 2 ( y' )? It is convenient to break up this question in the following way: does the convergence of a hypersingular integral with a constant characteristic (i.e. the convergence of the Riesz derivative (26.1)) imply that of such an integral with an arbitrary characteristic, and vice versa? In the first direction this question will be solved positively in the sense that the convergence of n a f implies that of D(i / for an arbitrary bounded characteristic. The boundedness condition may be weakened. Clearly, since the convergence of D (i / with the characteristic O(y') = 0 cannot imply the convergence of n a f, the inverse assertion will require a certain "ellipticity" condition on the characteristic O(y').
524
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
For the function /(z) itself we make an priori assumption that /(z) E L r (Rn ), 1 < r < oo , while the convergence of its hypersingular integral will b e considered in the space Lp(Rn ), 1 < p < oo: a
limo D0 ., /, D0/ = cwhere
(26.62)
n
(A� /)(x) ( )dy. 1 y Doa ,c f = d ,z(a) j n IYI>c I Y in +a '
We do not go into details here and give only the outline of our arguments. The details of the proof may be found in Nogin and Samko [1], [3]. Let f(z) E Lr (Rn ) and let the Riesz derivative n a f exist in L p (Rn ). For such functions one can directly verify that
D aO,c f -- A c D a f
(26.63)
where A, is a convolution operator with the kernel
a,
1 A z a (x, y)O(y') dy (z ) = d ,z(a) J IYin +a n IYI>c ,
(26.64)
Az ,a (z, y) being the function (26.27). This kernel is locally integrable l a,(x) l 5 clzl - n as l z l -+ oo. Using the properties of the function Az, a (z, y)
and (see § 26.3) one can show that the convolution operator with the kernel is bounded in Lp uniformly in €: I IAc ii L ,. -L ,. 5 c, where c does not depend on €. This fact allows us to justify the passage to a limit in (26.63) as € -+ 0 by the Banach-Steinhaus theorem. The limiting operator A = lim A, is an operator of c-o the form A
j ( -ix u)00(u)du I 0, ·
l xl = 1,
(26.65)
SR - 1
provided that hypersingular integrals of the neutral type are used (cf. (26.55)). If the characteristic is sufficiently smooth and satisfies the ellipticity condition
§ 26.
HYPERSINGULAR INTEGRALS AND RIESZ POTENTIALS
525
(26.65), then the inverse statement can be derived from (26.63), namely that the convergence of Dfi l in Lp implies that of ncr I in Lp, I E Lp. The above arguments are justifiable provided that 1 < p < oo, 1 < r < oo and 1 /p - a/ n 5 1/r 5 1/p. 26.5. Hypersingular integral with a homogeneous characteristic as a convolution with the distribution We shall show that the hypersingular integral (26.47) .may be represented as + a convolution with a generalized function of the form O(z')/lzl n a , i.e. the hypersingular integral coincides with the regularization of a divergent integral. Corresponding with (25.19) we define a regularization of a similar divergent integral with the characteristic 0( z') by the relation p .f.
O(z' ) I = lzl n + a *
j 0( Y') l(z - y)IYi-n(+Ra�- 1 l)(z) dY
IYI< 1
+f
IYI> 1
O(y')l(z - y) dY IYin +a
(26.66)
where
i (R�-1 1)(x) = L (-�) (Vi l)(x) li l � l - 1 J . is the Taylor sum and I > a. Passing to polar coordinates, we easily obtain p.f.
f
IYI
yi O(y') d _ { 0;/
in accordance with the definition moments (26.61). So p .f.
Iii =F a, Iii = a,
5.2. of a p.f.-integral, with 0; being the spherical
O(z') * I = f O( ') l(x - y) - x( y)(�- 1 l)(z ) d y y lzln + a IYin +a R"
+
�'
L..J
(- 1) 1i l o . (VJ. l)(z),
li l � i - 1 J" ! ( 1J" 1 - ;)
I>
a,
(26.67)
526
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
where the dash denotes omission of terms with I i i = a in the case of an integer a and x (y) is the characteristic function of the ball IYI < 1. If we choose I t o b e the integer, nearest to a , I > a, i.e . I = [a] + 1, then (26.67) may be written as
p.f.
fl ( z' ) f = f f(z - y) - ( Rf,a1 /)(z) fl (y' )dy, lz jn+a lyn +a R• *
(26.68)
a f:. 1 , 2, 3, . . . , which is directly verifiable. The form (26.68) has an evident advantage in comparison with (26.67) , but it is not suitable for integer values of a. (In the case of an integer a it may make sense at the cost of the restriction J fl (u)du = 0 , which excludes, in particular 11 ( u) Theorem 26.5.
is bounded. Then
=
s._ .
const .)
Let us suppose that 11(u) E L1(Sn _t), while f(z) E C1 (Rn ) and
(D{l/)(z) =
sin(a1r/2) 11( z' ) p. f n + Pn (a) · l xl a
(Dna /)( ...• ) =
sin(a1r/2) fl (x ' ) + 11 ( -x ' ) p . f. Pn (a) 2 lxl n + a
(Dna !)( z ) =
_
*
f
a f:. 2, 4, 6, . . . , (26.69)
'
cos(a ,./2) 11(x') - n( -x ' ) f Pn (a) P· · 2 lxl n + a
../.. a .,..
*
f
*
I, a f:. 2, 4, 6, . . . , (26.71)
'
2 ' 4 ' 6 , . . . , (26 . 70)
for hypersingular integrals of the neutral, even and odd type respectively. In the excluded cases of integer a in (26.69)-(26.71) the hypersingular integral is a differential operator in partial derivatives of order a:
a/ 2 11j (Vj f)(x) (Dan/)(z) - - ( -2{3l )[ ( )],. 1 L '1 J. 1. n J =a Cl'
(a = 2, 4, 6, . . . for a hypersingular integral a = 1, 3, 5, . . . in the case of an odd type).
(26.72)
of the neutral and even type and
Proof. Result (26.72) follows from (26.60) , but can be established directly avoiding
§ 26. HYPERSINGULAR INTEGRALS AND RIESZ POTENTIALS
527
consideration of Fourier transforms. Let us prove for example (26.69). We have
(DJ!i /)(z) = d.. ,:( a)
j 1�1<:';.: { /(z) + vt- 1 (-1)" G) [/((z - vy) - �� 1 (z)x(vy)) + �( -1)" G) R�� 1 (z)x (vy) } y
R"
d .
Hence after simple transformations
f(x - y) - x( y)�- 1 (x) d a: ) fl ') ( (DnOt /)(x) = - dAH(o:) y y IYi n+ a n ,l R"J ( -1).1li I Ii (Vi /){x), + ;r-L . n ,l ( 0: ) li l� l -1 J 1
(26.73)
where
By direct calculation we find that Ij = ��U�nj , where AHo:)/(o: - l i D is to be replaced by dAH a:)fda: in the case Iii = a: . So ( 26.73 ) turns into (26.69). Similarly (26.70 ) and (26.71) are proved.
26.6. Representation of differential operators in partial derivatives by hypersingular integrals We have shown above that the set of hypersingular operators (26.47) with a homogeneous characteristic contains some homogeneous differential operators, see ( 26.72 ) . Now we prove a stronger assertion, i.e. the inverse statement that all the homogeneous differential operators in partial derivatives of order a: with constant coefficients may be written as a hypersingular integral Dg/ with a homogeneous characteristic. But first we put a more general question , inspired by (26.52) in Fourier transforms. Let a(x/lxl) be a given homogeneous function. Does there exist a characteristic fl (x/ lxl ) such that (26.74) and how can it be constructed for a given a(x/ lxl )? We observe that the expression itself in the right-hand side of ( 26.74 ) may be considered as a generalization of the Liouville differential operation. It contains
528
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
partial or mixed Liouville differentiation as a particular case (see (24.14)-(24.15')) under the choice a(z) lzl-lo:l zf 1 z�· . Such a generalization of fractional differentiation - a convolution with a homogeneous function of order -a - n was considered by Sobolev and Nikolskii [1] . We want thus to show that this generalized differentiation coincides with a hypersingular integral with a certain characteristic. For precision let us deal with hypersingular integral of the neutral type. By (26.55), (26.74) is reduced to
=
• • •
(26.75)
lzl = 1,
a -::F 1, 3, 5, . . . ,
which is an integral equation of the first kind relative to the unknown characteristic O(u). This equation can be solved by means of harmonic analysis on a sphere, which is well presented in Stein [2] and Stein and Weiss [3] - see also Samko [31]. We recall that the Fourier-Laplace series of the function /(z), z E Sn _ 1 , is the series of the form
f(z) - L Ym (f, x) m= O
(26.76)
where Ym (/, z) is a harmonica! polynomial of order m confined to the unit sphere. The harmonic component Ym (/, z) of order m is evaluated by the relation
Ym ( /, z) = dI Sn (m)l J n- 1 S - 1 n
f(u)Pm (X u) du ·
(26.77)
where dn (m) :"t2:_:-22 (m +,: - 2) is a number of linearly independent harmonics of order Pm (t) is the generalized Legendre polynomial:
m.
=
where C� (t ) is the Gegenbauer polynomial and Tm (t) = cos ( m arccos t ) is the Chebyshev polynomial. The series in (26.76) converges to f(x) provided that this function is sufficiently smooth. Expanding the solution and the right-hand side of (26.75) in Fourier-Laplace
§ 26.
HYPERSINGULAR INTEGRALS AND RIESZ POTENTIALS
529
series, we arrive at the relation
(26.78) The relation
(26.79) is valid for any spherical harmonic Ym (u) if lxl have
= 1; in the case of an integer a we
a - m = 0, 2, 4, . . . , a - m = 1, 3, 5, . . . , a - m = -1, -2, -3, . . . ,
(26.80)
with Cm = 2 l -a 7rn / 2 f(1 + a) [ f ( m +;+ a ) f ( 1 + a-;m ) ] - l and lxl = 1 (see, for example, Samko [28, p. 163], [31, p. 91]). So in the case of a non-integer a from (26.78) we obtain
resulting from the linear independence of spherical harmonics of different orders. So the desired solution !l( x) may be represented by the series
(26.81) a =/= 1, 2, 3, . . . It can be shown that this series converges and is really a solution to the equation (26.75) if the function a(x), l xl = 1, is sufficiently smooth on the sphere. We do not elaborate on the proof of this. We observe also that the "slowly" convergent
530
CHAPTER
series
5.
INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
(26.81) may be summed up in terms of the divergent integral:
x = - 27r(n -rl)(/2 fC1 lxl = 1,
!!±.til
O( )
)
+
a:
o:/2) p .f. f;
1
s,. _ .
a( )dcr (ix · u)n+a '
(26.82)
C1
1 , 2, 3, . . .
(see Samko [30, p. 37); the integral on the right-hand side can be made meaningful by regularization or by analytic continuation in respect to a:) . The case of integer a: requires special consideration. We give the corresponding result in the following theorem. Theorem 26.6.
Let a: = 1, 2, 3, . . . and let
aa (V) = L ai vi li l = a be a homogeneous differential operator of order a with constant coefficients ai . There exists a homogeneous polynomial O a ( Y ) of order a: such that (26.83) where a hypersingular integral of the neutral or even type is used if a: = 2, 4, 6, . . . and of the odd type if a: = 1, 3, 5, . . . , the functions f( x) being assumed to be sufficiently good. The characteristic O a ( Y') of the hypersingular integral may be found by a given polynomial a a (x) via the relation
O a (Y) =
1 aa (cr)K(y
s .. _ .
·
cr)dcr, IYI = 1,
(26.84)
where
) [a/ 21 r (n/2) [a/ 2] k (n -1) a - k k !dn (o: - 2k)Pa - 2 �:(t), ( K(t) = r(-1) + r 2 � (�) �) + r (1
-1 < t < 1, dn (o: - 2k) and Pa- 2J:(t) are the same as in (26.77). Proof. For clarity we shall deal with the case of even a: = 2, 4, 6, . . .
By
(26.56)
§ 26.
531
HYPERSINGULAR INTEGRALS AND RIESZ POTENTIALS
for the Fourier transform of a hypersingular integral, the desired characteristic is to be determined from the equation
lxl = 1 .
(26.85)
We expand a a (x) and !l a ( x ) in spherical harmonic series as above in (26.76) , only these expansions are finite sums now. Substituting the expansions into (26.85), we arrive at the relations
Hence, by (26.80)
In view of (26.80) the summation on the left-hand side here is to be carried out for m = 0, 2, 4, . . . , a only, which agrees with the fact that the polynomial a a (x) contains harmonic components of even orders only. Since spherical harmonics of different orders are linearly independent, we obtain Y.m (n a , x
r r ( 1 + T) Y. ) = (-1) af 2 (�) m (a a J r (1 �) +
x
).
Consequently,
a- ) - Y (aa x) �0 f ( m + 2n + a ) r (1 + 2
a/ 2 a !l a (x) = r(1(-1) + a/2)
m
m
,
which is reduced to (26.84) by means of (26.77). The case a = 1 , 3, 5, . . . is treated similarly. • By straightforward calculations the reader can show that in the case a n when a 2 (x) = aij Xi x; , (26.84) becomes very simple, namely
L:
i ,j = l
=2
532
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
where tra 2
= �n aii = ls:_.l J •= 1
s,._ .
a 2 ( u ) du. In particular we see that -
(26.86)
26. 7. The space Ia (Lp ) of Riesz potentials and its characterization in terms of hypersingular integrals. The spaces L;, r (Rn ) We denote by (26.87) the space of Riesz potentials of functions in Lp (Jl!l). It is well defined if 0 < a < n and 1 :5 p < nfa. By Theorem 25.2 and the inequality in (25.42)
la (Lp ) C L9(Rn ), Ia (Lp ) C L9(Rn ; lxl - aP) , 1 < p < nfa,
q
=
np( n - ap) - 1 .
Repeating arguments from § 6.1, we can easily see that I a (Lp) =I L9(�), Ia (Lp) =I L9(Rn ; lzl - aP). I t c an b e shown that Ia (Lp ) does not coincide with any of the spaces L r (Rn ; p), 1 :5 r :5 oo, and thereby needs to be characterized. The space Ia (Lp ) may be defined for p � n/a also, the case a � n being admitted, if we interpret the Riesz potential in the sense of generalized functions on the Lizorkin space (25.16) :
which is proper by the invariance of the space � relative to 1 a . Of course under such a definition this is a space of generalized functions. These functions might be called "quasisingular" in the sense that their finite differences of sufficiently large order I > a are usual functions. (The finite differences of generalized functions are defined in a standard way: (A�/, w) = (/, A� h w)). We have already dealt with such a situation in the one-dimensional case - see Remark 8.2. More precisely, the following lemma is true.
Let f = Ia cp, cp E Lp , a > 0, 1 :5 p < oo, I > a. Then Lp (Rn ) for any h E Rn if p < nfa. If p � n/a, this assertion
Lemma 26.5.
(A�/)(z)
E
§ 26.
HYPERSINGULAR INTEGRALS AND RIESZ POTENTIALS
533
is replaced by the following: the functional A� / E 4>' is regular and admits an extension from the Lizorkin space 4> to the Schwartz space S:
(A� /, w) = (g,w), w E S,
(26.88)
where g = g( x) = Al ,a (·, h) * cp E Lp (Rn ).
Proof. From (26.32) and (26.33) we derive the estimate (26.89) for lzl 2:: (1 + l) l h l with c not depending on z and h. Thus Al , a (z, h) E Lt(Rn ) for every h, and then it follows from (26.41) that A� / E Lp (Rn ). Let 2:: nfa. Then (26.41) is valid in the sense of generalized functions in 4> : (A� /, w ) = (AI, a (·, h) * cp,w), w E 4>, cp E Lp , which is directly verified. The right-hand side of the latter equation admits an extension to all w E S. Besides this g = A l , a (·, h) * cp E Lp (R") since At, a ( z , h ) E L 1 (Rn ), which was required. • We define the norm in the space [a ( Lp ) by the relation
p
11 /II I"' (L p ) = llcpllp ,
1
� p < oo.
(26.90)
Let us pass to characterization of the space Ia (Lp) · We shall prove this characterization together with a consideration of the spaces
L;,r (Rn ) = {/ : / E Lr(Rn ), Da / E Lp (Rn )}, 11 /II L;,r = 11 / llr + IID a / lip, (X > 0, 1 � p < oo, 1 � r < oo,
(26.91)
which arise naturally as a certain generalization of the space [ a ( Lp). We emphasize that n a f in (26.91 ) is understood as convergent in Lp . see (26.26) . We begin with the following auxiliary theorem. -
Let f(z) E L;,r (Rn ), a > 0, 1 � p < oo, and 1 � r < oo. Then the difference (Ah f)(x) with m > a admits the representation
Theorem 26.7.
( A h) (x) =
j Am,a (x - € , h)(Da /)(€)de
R"
where Am, a (z, h) is the function (26.27).
(26.92)
534
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
Let us suppose that na I is constructed by means of a non-centered difference, the difference �h is centered and for simplicity let #; 0, 2, 4, , other variants being considered in a similar fashion. We denote cp� = D� I and Bcp = �m , a ( · , h) * cp. We have
Proof.
a
B
= d.. ,�( a)
{ J t.,.,a(z - y, h)f(y)dy
Lt(Rn) m
-_
Hence after the substitutions (25.68), we obtain
dz
a
in view of (26.89) , the interchange of the
R,.
IYI >e
z = c r , y = c�wz(e ) , where wz(e ) is the rotation
l le l e t - ve/lel l = le - ve l I yields
J �m,a(x - T, h)cpe ( r)dr J (�h f)(x - cr)Ki,a( lrl)dr. =
R,.
. . .
( I ) J f(z)dz J �m,a (Xjyj-nz+a- vy, h) dY
�( _ 1) " V = d , l1(a) � n "-0
which owing to the equality
n
ly- z l >�
R•
Since �m , a (z, h) E if > order of integration is possible. So B cp�
J
-
(26.93)
R,.
Hence (26.92) is obtained as c - 0. Let us justify the passage to a limit in (26.93). Since cp� -+ cp in Lp and �m , a (z, h) E Lt (Rn ) , the left-hand side converges in Lp . On the other hand, since f(x) E Lr and Kt, a (lrl) E L 1 , the right-hand side
§ 26. HYPERSINGULAR INTEGRALS AND RIESZ POTENTIALS
535
converges to (AI!" /)(z) in L r. The left- and right-hand sides in (26.93) coinciding, their limits have to coincide also (almost everywhere) . This gives (26.92) . • Remark 26.5. The representation (26.92) is an extension of (26.41) to the case
when information
/(z) E Ia(Lp) is replaced by the condition /(z) E L;,r(Rn).
Remark 26.6. Since (26.92) is obtained by the passage to a limit in (26.93), it is clearly true not only for / ( z) E L;,r (Rn ) but also under assumption that (Da /)(z) E Lp(Rn), (AI!" /)(z) E Lp(Rn), > a, 1 5 p < oo. The characterization of the space 1a ( Lp ) is given by the following theorem.
m
Let /(z) be locally integrable and lim /(z) = 0 . Then lxl-oo /(z) E Ia ( Lp), a > 0, 1 < p < oo, if and only if 1) /(z) E L9(Rn), q = npf(n - ap) , and na / E Lp (Jl'l) if 1 < p < n fa ; 2) (Ai/)(z) E Lp(Rn) and there exists lim J lh l - n - a(Ai/)(z)dh if p � . o
Theorem 26.8.
·
n/a,
where
I > 2[a/2]
is chosen as in §
c(Lp) - 1 hI > c 26. 2. In the
na I E L l holds in the "only if" part. Moreover
case
p= 1
the condition (26.94)
Proof. Consider the "only if" part. Let /(z) E Ia(Lp)· If 1 < p < n/a then f E L9 by the Sobolev Theorem 25.2, and if 1 5 p < nfa, then Da/ E Lp by Theorem 26.3. Let p � n fa. Then (Ai/) ( z) E Lp by (26.41) and the analysis of the proof of Theorem 26.2 shows that (26.40) is valid for n: f and therefore there exists lim n: f. We have thereby shown that Ia (Lp ) n Lr C LPa' r (Rn). c-o Consider the "if" part. Let /(z) E L;, r (Jl'l). Then we have (26.92). We observe that the right-hand side in (26.92) is AI!" IaDa
536
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
and then f(z) E /01 by (26.95). As for the case p � n/a , then (26.95) means the same, since the presence of a polynomial agrees with the definition of the space /01(Lp) in the case p � nfa. Therefore, the imbedding L�,r (R") � l01(Lp ) n Lr is proved, which together with the inverse imbedding, proved above, gives (26.94) . The relationship (26.94) yields the sufficiency of the conditions 1), if we take r = npf(n - ap). To obtain the sufficiency of the conditions 2) , we have to repeat arguments given above in the sufficiency part taking Remark 26.6 into account. • Corollary 1.
Let 1 < p < nfa. Then
The spaces L� r(R") do not depend on the type of the finite difference defining D 01 f and on ,order I of this difference under the rule for choice of I, indicated at the end of § 26.2.
Corollary 2.
The spaces L�,r (R") are complete. In view of (26.19) Theorem 28.8 gives a simple sufficiency condition for a function to belong to 101(Lp ), 1 < p < n/a: 1/ (z)l � c/(1 + lxl)><, and I (Vi /)(z) l � c/(1 + lxl)�', Iii = m > a ; A > nfq , JJ > nfp. We present another useful variant of the characterization of the space [01 ( Lp ) which deals with Lp-uniform boundedness of the truncated Riesz derivatives n: / , instead of their convergence. Corollary 3.
Theorem 26.9.
Let 1 < p < nfa. Then f(x) E 101(Lp ), if and only if
f(x) E Lq (R" ), q = npf(n - ap)
or ( 1 + lzl 01 )f(z) E Lp (R")
(26.96)
and there exists a sequence ct --. 0 such that (26.97)
where c does not depend on c�: . The is based on the property of the weak compactness of the space Lp ( R") . It is analogous to the proof of the similar one-dimensional Theorem 6.2 and is therefore omitted, see the proof of Theorem 6.2 which is presented in full; it is necessary to replace the operator (6.22) by the operator dm , a ( · ,
proof
h) *
537
§ 26. HYPERSINGULAR INTEGRALS AND RIESZ POTENTIALS
The space /01 ( Lp) may also be characterized in terms of the convergence in Lp of the hypersingular integrals (25.69) and (25.70), related to the Poisson and Gauss-Weierstrass semigroups. Namely, the following theorem is valid.
Then f(x) E l01(Lp) if and only if
Theorem 26.10. Let 0 < a < n, 1 < p < n/a. E L9, q = np/(n - ap), and
/
00
(L,.)
J t -l - af2 (E - Wt )1 fdt E Lp. 00
J
J� t - 1 - 01(E - Pt ) 1 fdt E Lp
or
lim
�-o
(L,.)
�
�
We also note the relation (26.97')
I E Lq(R"),
1 < p < oo, 1 < q < oo ,
which is valid provided that there exists one of these limits. If q = p this result follows from Theorem 23.4 and Theorem 26.10. Its validity for independent values of p and q may be seen in Samko [34]. We conclude this section by some simple estimates for the integral continuity modulus of the Riesz potential. Let f = [01
l h l --+ 0.
Here c = ll kt , a l h , where kt , a (x) is the kernel (26.28). The estimate (26.98) is derived from the representation
as
(�� f)(x) = l h l a J kt , a ( Y)
(26.99)
R"
where
wh ( Y) is
the rotation given in (25.68), which is obtained by the following
538
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
transformations
( I ) j I
l _ ""< -1} k (d'h /)(x) _1(a} k "Yn k� -0 =
R"'
the latter coinciding with {26.99}. Since k,, a (x) L t (Rn ) by Lemma 26.3, yields {26.98}. It also gives {26.98'} in view of {26.35).
E
{26.99}
§ 27. Bessel Fractional Integro-differentiation In this section we consider a fractional integr
(E-
E
27. 1 . The Bessel kernel and its properties The Fourier transform of the function {1 of the Bochner relation {25.11). We have r ' [{1 + l z l - "' 2 1 =
+
l .x l 2 } - a/ 2 may be evaluated by means
j 2/�;"';;!�! l l dp.
•/ (2 .-j - •/ 2 lxl ' - • ' 2 p ( 0
Here the integral converges if a > then by {1.86} we obtain
{n + 1}/2. Assuming this condition to be fulfilled,
:r- 1 [{1 + l .x l 2 ) - af 2] =
2(2-n- a)/ 2 K(n - a)/ 2 { 1 xl} �G (.x } a 7rn/ 2 f( a/2} l z l (n- a)/ 2
{27.1}
§ 27.
BESSEL FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
539
where K,(z) is the modified Bessel function ( 1 .85). This expression has a meaning for all a > 0. The function Ga (x) is called the Bessel kernel. We give some of its properties. First of all we shall clear up its behaviour at the origin and at infinity.
The function Ga (x) admitting the estimate
Lemma 27. 1.
Ga (x)
�
�
is
infinitely differentiable beyond the origin
r((n -a)/ 2) I X 1 a- n ' 201r•/'Jr (a/ 2) 2 " lr•.J'Jr(n/ 2) In rxr' r(( /'J n)/ 2) ' r(a/ 2) 2• r n.a-
if 0 < a < n, if a = n , if a >
n,
as lxl --+ 0 and the estimate
l z l (a- n - 1)/ 2 e - lxl Ga (x) "' 2(n+ a1)/ 2 7r(n - 1 )/ 2 f(a/2) as l xl --+ oo.
The statements of the lemma follow immediately from the known properties of the modified Bessel function: K, (z) "' 2" - 1 f(v) z- ", v ::f; 0, K0 (z) "' ln(1/z) as z --+ 0 and K,(z) "' (7r / 2z) 1 1 2 e - z as z --+ oo . - Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi [2, 7.4.1 (1)]. In this connection we note the relation
/2) 1 / 2 zv e - z J00 e - zt t v - 1/ 2 (1 + t/2) v - 1 / 2 dt K" (z) = ( 7rf(v + 1/2) 0 Corollary.
·
(27.2)
Ga (x) E L t (Rn ), a > 0.
Now, employing properties of the function Ga (x) with firstly its rapid decrease at infinity, it is not difficult to show by means of (25.11) again that
(27.3) for all a > 0, Re a > 0, in fact may be taken. It follows from (27.3) that
Ga G{3 = Ga+f3 , a > 0, {3 > 0, (E - d)Ga = Ga- 2 1 a > 2, *
(27.4) (27.5)
540
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
j G01 (x)dx = 1,
a >
0.
(27.6)
R"
We mention also the relation
(27.7) Its proof may be seen in Stein [2, p. 155]. We now define the Bessel potential by the relation
G01 tp = J G01 (x - y)tp(y)dy.
(27.8)
R"
By Lemma 27.1 it is well defined for example for functions 1 :5 p :5 oo, and represents an operator bounded in Lp ( Rn):
tp(y)
E
Lp(Rn),
(27.9) this inequality being implied by (27.6) and the positiveness of the kernel G01 (x). Equations (27.3) and (27.4) immediately yield the following simple properties of Bessel fractional integration:
(27.10) (the semigroup property), and
(27.11) In contrast to the case of the Riesz potential (27.10) holds for functions in Lp with all 1 :5 p :5 oo, a > 0, (3 > 0. We write below G0 = when it is necessary to admit the case a = 0. The operator G01 may be considered as a constructive realization of a negative power of the operator � . It is of great interest to realize constructively positive powers of this operator as was done in §§ 25 and 26 for ( - � ) 011 2 • Such a realization will be given in § 27.4.
E
E-
§ 27.
BESSEL FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
541
27 2 Connections with Poisson, Gauss-Weierstrass and metaharmonic continuation semigroups .
.
The Riesz potential was seen to be connected with the Poisson integral by (25.52). A similar connection of the Bessel potential with this integral is given in terms of special functions. Thus, the following theorem is valid. Theorem 27.1.
Let
(27. 12) where Pt
The proof of the theorem is obtained by interchanging the order of integration in
the right-hand side of (27.12), which is made possible by Fubini's theorem, and applying then the relation
2(1 - a)/ 2 fi f t ( a- 1 )/ 2 J ( a- l )f 2 (t)P(x, t)dt = Ga (x) r (a/2) 0 00
(27.13)
where P(x, t) is the Poisson kernel (25.49). As for (27.13), it is contained in (1.86) according to ( 27.1). Meantime there exists a modification of the Bessel potential (suggested by Flett ) which is connected with the Poisson integral in a simpler manner. This modification is based on using the function (1 + lxl ) a instead of (1 + lxl 2 ) af 2 in Fourier transforms. We set
f!Ja
{27.14)
R"
where the kernel f!3a (x) is the Fourier original of the function connected with the Poisson kernel P(x, t) by
l!!a {z) = f{�) t a- l - t P(z, t)dt 00
j 0
.
(1 + l xl) -a .
This is
(27.15)
542
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
which may be easily verified by Fourier transforms: 00
(1 + l z l ) - a = r(�) j t a - l e - t P(· , t)dt ,
(27.16)
0
the point denoting the variable in which the Fourier transform is applied. As for (27.16), it follows from (25.54). The kernel � a (z) may be written in the form
(27.17) where Cn is the constant from (25.49), this result being a paraphrase of (27.15). The following properties of the kernel (!S a are easily derived from (27.15) and
(27.17): 1) � a is infinitely differentiable beyond the origin and �a (z) > 0, z I- 0; + l)/ 2)r((n - a)/ 2) l z l a- n as x - 0 if 0 < a < n , �n (z) 2) � a (z) - r((a2r {a)li'("+ I)/l � In � as z - 0 and �a (z) is continuous in the point z = 0, if a > n ; 3) � a (z) - acn l z l - n - l as z - oo , so that �a (z) E L 1 (Rn ), besides this J �a (z)dz = 1. R" It follows from the above properties that the potential �a
Lp (Rn ), 1 � p � oo . 00
f!J"
Th en
f(�) j t"- 1 e -• P,
(27.19)
0
We give also two other integral representations of type (27.12) and (27.15) for the Bessel potential Ga
§ 27. BESSEL FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
543
integral:
Ga cp r (�/2} f t a/ 2 - l e -t (Wccp)(x)dt. 0 a The second one expresses a cp via metaharmonic continuation 00
=
(27.20}
(27.21} of a function
cp by the formula 00
Ga
=
f(�) J ta- !(M,
(27.22)
0
(compare the representation
(25.51} for the Riesz potential} . The following results
e - '(WcGa cp)(x) = (1�1 \ e - T WT cp)(x))(t } , (MtGa cp)(x) (I� (MT cp)(x) } (t), =
(27.23} (27.24}
are close to relations (27.20} and (27.22} being similar to (25.52} and (25.53). Equations (27.20}-(27.24) become obvious in Fourier transforms if we take into account that
F(e - ' W, cp) = e - t ( l +l � l :l ) t,O(x), F( Mccp) e -t v'l +l� l 2t,O (x), =
(27.25} (27.26}
27 3 The space of Bessel potentials .
.
We shall call the range
(27.27} Q > 0,
1 �p�
00
aa the space of Bessel potentials. Sometimes this space is called the Liouville space offractional smoothness a . This is Banach space relative to the
of the operator
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
544
norm As we shall see below, this space is an extension of the Sobolev spaces L;a ( R!' ) t o the case of fractional order a . S o the spaces defined in (27.27) ar e al so called
Sobolev spaces of fractional order.
Remark 27.1. The spaces Ga (Lp ) and
potential (27. 14), coincide:
� a (Lp ), where � a cp is the modified Bessel
One can prove this by means of the fact that the functions ( 1 + l zl) or 1 and ( 1 + l z l 2 ) or/2 are Fourier transforms of functions integrable over R!' ( cf. the Corollary of Lemma 5.2 in Samko [31, p. 52]). The characterization of the space cor ( Lp ) presented in this subsection, has much in common with that of the space of Riesz potentials given in terms of the Riesz derivative. Among the spaces L;, r (R!') defined in § 26.7, we consider now the important case r = p. We find it convenient to introduce the special designation
Q > 0, 1 :::; p < 00.
(27.28)
The space of Bessel potentials consist of those and only those functions f(z) E Lp (Rn ) which have Riesz derivative of order a in Lp(Rn ), i.e . Theorem 27.3.
We precede the proof of this theorem with the following lemma. Lemma 27 .2.
The set CQ" is dense in
§ 27.
BESSEL FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
545
of the Lemma. 1. We show first that infinitely differentiable functions in Lp (Rn ) form a dense set in L;(Rn ). This is achieved by standard means which are used to show the denseness of "good" functions in various function spaces, i.e. by the identity approximation
Proof
( )
lm (z) = J a( y) l z - ! dy, I E L; , R"
a(y) E ego , I a(y)dy = 1. Then II / - lm l iP --+ 0 as m --+ 00 and it is R" readily seen that D� fm = (D� /) m· So there exists n a fm = lim D� fm and e -o na lm = (D a /)m · Therefore II Da (/m - /)l ip = II (Da /)m - n a / lip --+ 0 as m --+ 0. We note that since a(z) E ego , then Vi lm E Lp (Rn ) for all Ii i = 0, 1, 2, . . . 2. It remains to approximate the function /(z) in the space L;(HR) by COO-functions under assumption that /(z) E C00 (Rn ) and (vi /)(z) E Lp (Rn ), Iii = 0, 1, 2, . . . Let p(z) be any function in ego which has the support in the ball l z l < 2, is identically equal to 1 for l z l $ 1 and such that lp(z)l $ 1. We have to where
show that the ''truncation"
= p(z/N) /(z) e C0 PN (z) /(z) def approximates the function / (z) under the norm II /Il P + un a /l ip as N --+ 00. We denote 11( z) = 1 - p(z) and liN (z) = 11 ( z/N). It is sufficient to verify that IID a ( IIN /) lip --+ 0. We have I
D a (vN I) = VN Da I = d;;J (a) I; k=l
(!) BN,l l
where
BN, J:/ = J IYI - n -a ( �:IIN) (z)( ��- k /)(z - ky)dy, R"
(27.29 )
k = 1, 2, . . . , I, so that the passage II BN,t/ llp --+ 0, N --+ oo has to be justified. Since �:liN = �: JlN , k > 0, and l ( �:p)(z) l $ clyl k /(1 + lyl )'= according to (26.20), by the Minkowsky inequality we obtain
li BN,l lll. 5, cN- k J IYi k - n -a R"
( � r l il A�-· ll i,dy. 1+
(27.30 )
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
546
(26.19) that II Ll�- 1: /l ip � c lyl l- 1: 2: IIVj /l ip = clyll - 1: , Jj J =l Vi f E Lp(Rn) for all Ii i = 0, 1, 2, . . . So from (27.30) we 1:have It follows from
since
Hence simple transformations lead to II BN, A: / IIp � caN - A: + c4 N -a in the case k f; a; if a is an integer and k = a, then II BN, k! IIP � cN -a ln N. • of Theorem 27 .3. Let us prove the imbedding
Proof
(27.31) Since
Ga (x) E L 1 (Rn) by Lemma 27.1, then aa(Lp) C Lp .
Further, we have
1 lxl a . 1 2 2 (1 + lzl )a/ lzl a ( 1 + lzl 2 ) a/ 2
(27.32)
known (Stein [2, p. 157], see also Samko [31, p. 51]) that the function l x l a (l + lxl 2 ) -af 2 - 1 is the Fourier transform of a function in Lt(Rn). So (27. �2) means in Fourier pre-images that
It
is
(27.33) where A is a convolution operator with a summable kernel. By the boundedness of the involved operators (27.33) is extended from the case of functions cp E CC) to cp E Lp(Rn), 1 � p < n fa. The validity of (27.33) for cp E Lp(�) when p � nfa is a corollary of the definition of Ia cp for such cp (see § 26.7). The identity (27.33) implies then that aa (Lp) � Lp n Ia(Lp)· So the imbedding (27.31) is proved in view of (26.94). As well, by (27.33), for I = ca cp we have
II / I lL; = 11/llp + II D a /l ip � ll
Let us prove the inverse imbedding. Let f E L; (Rn). We use the density of CC) in L; (Rn), obtained in Lemma 27.2, and approximate f by functions fm E CC) with + t z , ,r,, respect to the norm 11/llp + II D a /l i p · We have 1 = ( l + l z1l,)""/2 ( l t+l (1 + l x l a ). z Here
(l
c..
i�1�1>: - 1 is the Fourier transform of a summable function (see Stein [2, '2
§ 27.
BESSEL FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
p. 157-158], and also Samko identity in Fourier originals:
(31,
p.
52].
547
The latter relation yields the following
{27.34) where U is a convolution operator with a summable kernel. Since the operators G01 and U are bounded in Lp (Rn ), 1 � p after passage to the limit as we obtain from {27.34) that f E G01(Lp ), i.e. L;(Rn ) � G01(Lp ), as well as 11 /II G"' (L . ) = II (E + U)(f + D 01 /) l iP � c( ll/llp + II D01 / l ip) = ell / IlL; which completes the proof. •
< oo,
m � oo
The operator G01 maps the space L�(Rn ) isomorphically onto the space + n L; P(R ), a � 0, {3 � 0. Corollary.
27 4 The realization of ( E - � ) a/ 2 , hypersingular integrals .
.
a
>
0, in terms of
Since ( E - t1 ) 011 2 f = _r- l ( 1 + lz 1 2 )011 2 .1"f by definition, our discussion is in fact about the inversion of Bessel potentials I = G01cp, Q > 0. The function cp will be first taken to be in the Schwartz space S which is invariant relative to the operator · G01 , and then we consider the problem of inversion for cp E Lp . The operator inverse to G01 will be considered in terms of hypersingular-type integrals, containing the remainder of the Taylor series for the function / (z) (see (26.68)). For f E S and a > 0, a 1= 2, 4, 6, . . . we set
T01 f = L Ca ,; (Vi /)(z} + da J (f(x - y) - (Jlia1 /}(z)] IYI - n - a Aa ( lyl )dy (27.35) R•
j E Aar
where (JlL011 /)(z) is the same as in (26.65), Aa is the set of multiindices with length � (a] and even components, and
d(){ - 7r n/ 2 f(2 (){-a/2) ' - - --:----
w;
=
j uidu,
S n- 1
(27.36) 00
= f e - l + (n+ a)/ 2 e - � - IY I 2 /(4�) de. 0
548
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
(n )
We remark that r �W Wj = r (�) . . . r (ia;- 1 ) in the case of even it , . . . , in · We note also that if 0 a 1 , then
< <
() T" I = l(x) - da j l(��i:+� y � a ( i yl)dy.
(27.37)
R•
It is easily verified that the characteristic A a ( lyl) of the hypersingular integral in (27 .35) and (27 .37) stabilizes at the origin and at infinity as a Holderian function; hypersingular integrals with such characteristics were studied in the paper by Samko [20] , the results of which will be used below. Theorem 27.4. Let a > 0, a :f; 2, 4, 6, . . . where Ta is the operator (27.35).
Proof.
S as
and let cp E S. Then Ta Gacp = cp,
We note that the operator inverse to ca may be written for functions in (27.38)
where the Fourier transform .r- 1 ( 1 + IYI 2 ) af 2 is interpreted in the sense of S' distributions. This is easily justified by means of the known Gel'fand-Shilov theorem (Gel'fand and Shilov [1 , p. 179]). So we are to show that (27.39) If Rea
< 0, taking (27.36) into account, we have (r 1 ( 1 +
IYI 2 ) "' 2 , I( x + y)) = da j ����!� I(Y + x )dy . R•
(27 . 40 )
Since the left-hand side is analytic with respect to a in the whole complex plane, we may consider (27 .40) to be valid for Re a > 0 also if the integral in the right-hand side is interpreted as an analytic continuation . Such a continuation is realized by subtracting a Taylor sum of the function f(x) under the integral sign. Carrying out a direct evaluation we arrive at (27.39) . • Remark 27.2. Since ( 1 + l x l 2 ) k =
k E x 2i , then the operator inverse to ca in i (�) l l =O
§ 27.
BESSEL FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
549
the case a = 2, 4, 6, . . . has the form
(27.41) Now, w e shall show that the operator cp E Lp as well, if it is interpreted as
ra inverses the potential I = oa cp for (27.42)
where r: 1 is the construction (27.35) with the integration over nn being replaced by that over IYI > c . Derivatives Vi f of a function f(x) E oa (Lp ) will be understood in the sense of generalized functions. Existence of derivatives Vi I for 1 = oa cp follows from the fact that
Ga (Lp ) C L;:',
m=
0, 1, . . . , [a) .
Let a > 0, a :f:. 2, 4, 6, . . , cp a a r r o cp = cp, where a is the operator (27.42). Theorem 27.5.
Proof.
.
E
Lp , 1
< p < oo.
Then
We are to show that
(27.43) We first prove the uniform estimate
(27.44) with c not depending on c. Its proof will use the idea of Fourier-multipliers in Lp (Stein (2, p. 113]). Since II Vi Ga cp llp :5 cllcp i i P which is easily verified by means of Theorem 3 from Stein [2, p. 114], then (27.44) will readily follow from the estimate
(27.45)
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
550
with c not depending on E, where
D �"'o .•"'., f J f(z - y�y�n+a( Rl,ol/)(z) � a ( ly l)dy. IY I > e =
Let
(27.46)
iz·y - "'""
-- J (e LJ ili lxj !iyi ) �I Yai(ln+ayl ) dy (27.46') l 5[ ) a IYI>e il so that Y:( D �o ;e f ) = ue (z)/(z), f E S. As for (27.45), it is a consequence of the following lemma. Lemma 27.3. The function (1 + l x l 2 ) a f 2 ue (x ) , a > 0, belongs to the space Mp of Fourier-multipliers in Lp , 1 < p < oo {1 � p < oo if O < a < 1}, besides this
(27.47) with c not depending on E.
In the case 0 < a < 1 we refer to Samko [20] where was proved in this case for arbitrary stabilizing characteristics even in a stronger form - in terms of absolute summability of the Fourier integral of the function (1 + uniformly in c. So we give the proof in the case a � 1. We shall use Theorem 3 from Stein [2, p . 114], which states that to show (27.47) it is sufficient to verify the estimates
Proof of the lemma.
(27 .47)
lz l2 )- af2 ue (z)
(27.48) with c not depending on E. By the Leibniz formula it is clear that from the inequalities
(27.48) follows
(27.49) c not depending on c again.
Let us prove
v•O', (z) =
(27.49). If [a] + 1 � 11 � [n/2] + 1, then
j ����r0 �a ( l y l )e'r·• dy IY I > e
(27.50)
since differentiation under the integral sign is possible owing to the rapid decrease which is seen from (27.36). \Ve represent the monomial as of
�a ( l y l) I YI --+ oo
(iy)"
§ 27.
BESSEL FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
551
[lvl/2] (iy)" = E IYI 2m Pj vl - 2m ( Y), where Pj v l - 2m ( Y) are homogeneous harmonic m =O polynomials of orders l v l - 2m (see Stein and Weiss [3, p. 159]). Passing to polar as
coordinates and applying the Funk-Hecke formula, (Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi [2, 11.4] or Samko [31, p. 43]), and the relation 2.12.2.2 from the hand-book by Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev [2], we have
(27.51)
If a - I v i + ( + 1) /2 > 1, then owing to the known behaviour of the Bessel function as e --+ 0 and e --+ we have
n
oo ,
00
IV" u£(z)l � c lzl a - v E e lvl -a- n/ 2 1Ji v l - 2m - l +n / 2 (e)lde = clzl a-v .
J 0
As for the case a - l vl + ( + 1)/2 :5 1, the estimates in view of the uniform boundedness of the integrals
n
(27.49) follow from (27.51)
which is obtained owing to monotonicity of the function A a (e). Let now I v i If a -::f 1, 3, 5, . . . , we have
IV" u£ (z)l :5c
J
<
[a]+ 1.
IYI Iv l -a- n l( z . Y) l [a]+ l - l v l dy
1!11 < 1�1-1
+ c E lzl li l li i S [a] - v IY> I�I - 1
j
If a
= 1, 3, 5, . . . , by the Taylor formula with the remainder i n the integral form,
552
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
we have
" L...J
-nv Ue ( ) _ ·I vi v
X -1
(a + 1 'I J·
Ivi) ! ; X
li l=o+l- l vl f ( l - e) o- l vl de f y" +i I Y I - n -o Ao (lyl)ei(z·y dy. lr l > e Transforming the integral over I Y I > in the same way as the integral in (27.50), 1
X
0
c
we obtain (27.49). • The uniform estimate (27.44) being thus obtained, it remains by the Banach Steinhaus theorem to verify (27.43) on the Schwartz space S which is dense in L,. Since T0G0cp = cp for cp E S by Theorem 27.4, it can be shown that 0 by means of the Parseval equality and the Lebesgue II Te0 G0 cp -- cpl12 ---+ e -o dominated convergence theorem - employ the representation (27 .46') at first. Let us choose r > 1 so that p was between 2 and r and let fJ = 2(r - p)/p(r - 2). Then we derive from the interpolation inequality 11/11, 5 11111: - 6 11/11� and the uniform estimate (27.44) that (27.43) holds for cp E S. •
= 2, 4, 6, . . . the operator (27.41 ) is inverse to the potential G0cp within the frames of £,-spaces in the weak sense: Remark 27.3. It is easily verified that in the case a
In conclusion we give three other ways to effectively construct the operator We shall limit ourselves to giving very brief information, the corresponding references may be found in § 29. 1 . The first way is connected with the transformation of the operator (27.35) to the form
(E - �)01 2 , a > 0.
(27.52) where
h0 (y) E
L1 (Rn ) and D0/ is the hypersingular integral ( ( no = j �� nf+) x ) n( y)dy IYi o n
(27.53)
R,.
the characteristic fl(y) of which is a polynomial of degree less than a explicit expression for h 0 (y) and fl(y) in Nogin [7] .
-
see the
§ 27.
BESSEL FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
Let a > 0, a :/:; 2, 4, 6, . . . , 1 < p < Ta Gacp = cp where a Tal = ha * I + lim n O, £ I (L , )
Theorem 27.6.
oo
553
and tp E Lp(Rn). Then
e-o
D n,e l being the "truncated" (lyl > e) integral, corresponding to (27.53).
We remark that a certain advantage of the construction (27.52) in comparison with (27.35) consists in the fact that it contains a hypersingular integral of a simpler form, constructed in terms of translations of the function l (z). The second way is related to (27.20) and is similar in a sense to the statements for the Riesz potentials in (25.70) and in Theorems 26.3' and 26.10. Let us denote 00
17'\�eal = x(a1/2, I) j t -l-af2 (E - e -t w, )1 1dt 0 < a < 21 '
e
where
x(a/2, I) is the constant (5.81).
Theorem 27. 7. (L p )
lim e-o
��Ga tp =
tp
Let tp E Lp(R"). Then
if 1 � p < oo .
lim
(p .p .) e-o
(27.54)
'
��Ga cp =
tp
if 1
�p�
oo
and
Theorem 27.7 remains valid if we set
1 �ae / - x(a,-I) j t -l-a ( E - 1\f )1 1dt 0 < a < I, 00
'
e
'
{27.55)
where M, is the semigroup (27.21). Finally, the third way is based on the idea of introducing hypersingular integrals with the "weighted" differences
p) �1a f = _1_ J (A� I)(z, dn ,l (a) I Y in+a dy, R"
( �� f)(z, p) =
� (!)<-l)ip(l:, y)/(z - ky).
(27.56)
For distinctness we consider the case of non-centered differences. We remark that the "weighted" difference with the weight p(k, y) = e - k y has already occurred in consideration of the Bessel potentials in § 18.4, as in (18.77). We define the weight
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
554
p(k, y) in (27.56) by the relation p( lc , y) = 2 1 - (n +a)/ •
( ( � a )) - 1 (lc lyl)
n
If f E S, the integrals (27.56) with this weight have the following properties: a) the integral (27.56) converges absolutely if l > a and conventionally if 2[a/2] l � a; b) if a 1, 3, 5, . . . and I > a, then T,a f = 0; c) :F(T,a f) dn ,l (a)(1 + l zl 2 ) a/ 2 /(z), where the constant dn , l (a) is the same as in § 26. The statement of Theorem 27.7 remains true if we replace l)� f by the truncated integral (27.56) with integration over IYI > c (Rubin (24, 25]).
<
=
=
§ 28. Other Forms of Multidimensional Integro·
differentiation
Fractional integro-differentiation of functions of many variables defined in the whole space Rn , which was considered in §§ 25-27, was a realization of the fractional power ( - � ) - a/ 2 or (E - �) - a/ 2 , � being Laplacian. The direct generalization of this approach is to consider fractional powers of an arbitrary differential operator in partial derivatives. We do not consider this question in such a generality, but focus only on fractional powers of the simplest differential operators (28. 1) (ultra-hyperbolic case) (28.2) (parabolic case). Fractional integro-differentiation considered in §§ 25-27 pertains, thereby, to the elliptic case. The realization of a negative fractional power of the former operator will lead to Riesz hyperbolic potentials with Lorentz distance and of the latter to parabolic potentials. These potentials are first considered, then the realization of a positive fractional power of the parabolic operator (28.2) is given. In the conclusion of this section we study the fractional integration which adjoins in a sense to constructions in § 24 and differs from them by the fact that integration in the corresponding fractional integrals is carried out not over the octant or a parallelepiped with the opposite vertices z ( x 1 1 . , Z n ) and a ( a 1 , . . . , a n ) as in § 24, but over a pyramid with the vertex at the point z and
=
=
. .
§ 28.
OTHER FORMS OF INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
555
a base being a constant hyperplane not depending on x. We call such a fractional integration 'pyramidal'.
28. 1 . Riesz potentials with Lorentz distance (hyperbolic Riesz potentials) Similarly to the definition of Riesz fractional integro-differentiation in the elliptic case in § 25, the idea of introducing fractional powers is obvious, at least formally, in Fourier transforms. In fact, since the application of the operator (28.1) is reduced by Fourier transforms to multiplication by the quadratic form:
:F( -D,cp) = P(x):Fcp, P(x) = x� +
· ·
·
+ x; - x; + t -
·
· ·
-
x� ,
{28.3)
it is natural to introduce the fractional powers ( - Dp )A as the operators, which are defined by Fourier transforms by means of multiplication by the fractional power of the quadratic form P(x). We note, however, that in contrast to the elliptic case, the quadratic form P( x) has no definite sign. Of course, one might avoid raising negative values to a power by considering IP(x)IA or jP{x) jAsign P(x). But the fractional powers obtained in this way do not contain the usual integer powers of the operator - Dp , the former for odd ..\ and the latter for even ones. So we shall use the standard way of raising to a power with the choice of the "principal" value. We introduce the standard notations:
p� =
{ �(z) l'
if P(x) > 0, if P(x) :5 0,
p_A =
{ 0IP(x)IA
if P(x) if P(x)
2: 0,
< 0,
and
P(x) > 0, P(x) 0.
<
So
{28.4) Starting from {28.3) we introduce two following forms of the fractional power of the D 'A lembertian:
{28.5)
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
556
(cf. (7 .4) in the one-dimensional case ) . The formula of the Fourier transform of fractional powers of quadratic forms is known in the theory of generalized functions. We give it in the form (28.6) convenient for our purposes, where "Yn ( a ) is the familiar normalizing constant (25.26) used for the elliptic lliesz potential. The proof of (28.6) may be found in Gel'fand and Shilov [2, p. 349]. By (28.6) the operation (28.5) with A = -a/2 is to be realized as a convolution with the function e± !!jZ wi i
n ( a)
(P ± iO) -r = or - A
1
--
"Yn (a)
(e± !!.jL ra P-�+ - + e± T- r• P -�- ) . n-
.
or - A
or -
•
or - A
-
(28.7)
We denote this convolution by
so that
( - Dp) ±a/ 2 = IP ±io ·
By
(28.7) this operator has the form (28.8)
where and
K±
r (y) = .JP[Y) =
JX� + · · · + X� - x;+l -
· · ·
- X�
denote the following cones:
K+ = {x : x E Rn , P(x) � 0}, K_ = {x : x E R" , P(x) � O}. The function r(y) is called the Lorentz distance and the cone K+ is known as the light cone or characteristic cone. The integrals in (28.8) converge in the case of sufficiently good functions if a > n - 2. One can make sure that this is so by representing r" -a ( y) as r" - a ( y) = I Iy' 12 - I y" 1 2 1)n - a)/ 2 where y' -- ( Yl , . . . , Yp ) E RP and YII -- ( Yp+ 1 , . . . , Yn ) E Rn -p ,
§ 28. OTHER FORMS OF INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
557
by passing to repeated integration over RP and Jl'l -P and introducing polar p coordinates in the integral over Rn- , which will give the condition (n - a)/2 1. In the case a � n - 2 the construction {28.8) is not determined, but it admits the continuation, analytical in respect to a which is well suited for a � n - 2. We do not elaborate on such a continuation, see the references in § 29.1. It follows directly from {28.5) that <
a+f3 a 1{3P ± iO -- JP±iO IP±iO
{28.9)
·
We put the following question: is it possible to introduce an operator of hyperbolic fractional integration of the type {28.8) with the integration over only one of the cones K+ and K_ and such that the semigroup property {28.9) remains true? It is clear that for this purpose we have to start not from the function (P iO) >. , but from the functions P� or P� . In view of {28.4), {28.6) after simple transformations yields relations ±
( . ( 1n (a)a) 1r12 (
. p - a 1r p -a / 2 + Sill. p1r p - a/ 2 :F( p(+a- n ) / 2 ) -- 1n (a) Sill . \ I n - a ) 1r /2 Sill 2 + 2 :F( p(_a- n ) / 2 ) -
_
Sill n -
)
'
{28.10)
n - P p - a/ 2 . n - P - a 1r p_- a/ 2 . Sill -7r + + Sill
2
2
).
Hence {28.11)
if and
(
)
p=
2 ' 4, 6, . . .
:F p!_o; "> = (-1) � - l 'Yn (a) sin aTr/2 P� � sill { n - a)Tr/2 .
if
n-p=
{28. 12)
2, 4, 6, . . .
Therefore, the potentials p = 2, 4, 6, . . . ,
{28.13)
558
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
(-1) �- l cp(x - y)dy n - p = 2, 4, 6, . . . , lp_ 'P = ....;. H....;...._ �---:.. (-a:--)- J l rn - a (y)l ' K_ with
a > n - 2 and
a?r/2 Hn, (a) = 'Yn (a) sm. sin ( n - a ) 1r/2
(28.14)
(28.15)
admit the semigroup property
(28.16)
in view of (28.11) and (28.12), provided that p = 2, 4, 6, . . . in the case of the sign + and p = n - 2, n - 4, n - 6, . . . in the case of the sign - . We single out the case p = 1. The form (28.13) may not b e applied i n this case, while (28.14) may be used for odd
n:
(n + l)/ 2 Ipa_ 'P - ( -1) H�(a)
cp(x - y)
J rn -a(y)l dy, K_ l
p = 1, n = 3, 5, 7, . . .
(28.17)
However, there is another variant m the case p = 1, namely that which was introduced by Riesz. In the light cone K+ we consider the positive half-cone
(28.18) and designate X - y) dy, a > n - 2, l0a cp - H 1(a) J It'( n r n x+ - a (y) -
--
(28.19)
+
emphasizing the relation of the operator (28.19) to the D'Alembertian 82 82 - p - -/l.r . The normalizing constant Hn (a) is chosen as P x2 xl
-
• •
•
0
=
n
Hn (a) = 2 sin(n'Yn-(a)a) ?r /2 = 2"- t .- - t+n / 2 r
which becomes clear below.
( i) r ( "' � - n ) +
(28.20)
§ 28.
559
OTHER FORMS OF INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
This is the potential (28.19) that is usually called It may be also rewritten as l()(
1 D
( )
the hyperbolic Riesz potential.
rn - 01 ( x - y)
(28.21)
where
is the negative light half-cone with the vertex shifted to the point x. Let us show that the operator /0 admits the semigroup property
(28.22) provided that the normalizing constant is given by (28.20). To prove this we first calculate the Riesz potential of the exponential function ex 1 • In this case we have
and if we choose
Hn (a) =
j e-Y 1 r01 - n (y)dy
K+ +
(28.23)
we obtain
(28.24) Calculating the integral 00
(28.23) we have
Hn (a) = J e - 111 dy1 o
J (y� - le i2 )(0t- n)/2 � , e = (y2 , . . . , Yn ) E Rn - l .
1ei < Y1
560
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
Hence
Hn (a) = f yf- 1 e -Y tdy1 f { 1 - l7712 )(a -n )/2 df] 1771<1 1 2 (a n) 2 " 2 1 = r(a) I Sn - 2 f{ 1 - p ) - / p - dp, 00
0
0
which coincides with {28.20) after simple transformations. We observe that a more general equality
ea·x. . . 2 ' loa (ea·x ) = -(a-=i,._.. a-=-�----- a��,...)a--:.- /�
{28.25)
may be derived from {28.24) ( cf. (25.39) ) . This is the result (28.24) which allows us to give a direct proof of the semigroup property . {28.22 ) . Taking > n - 2 and {3 > n - 2, we have
a
1/j lg tp = Hn (<>)lHn (PJ K f(x) r"- n (x - y)dyK_;f(y) ,.P-n (y - e)tp(e)de. _;
K+(y) K+(x ) for y E I<+ (x) .
C It is clear that integration we obtain
So, interchanging the order of
IQigtp = Hn (<>)lHn (P) j 'l'(e)de j r" - n (x - y),.P - n (y - e) dy D(x,O K_; (x) where
K+(y)
(28.26 )
D(x,e) = K+(x) Kt(e) (introduce the characteristic function of the cone n
while interchanging the order of integration ) . By means of the shift along the surface of the cone and dilatation we see that the inner integral is equal to
ra+.B- n (x - e)Bn (a, {3) , Bn (a , {3) = f
D(O,e1 )
e 1 = ( 1 , 0, . . . , 0) ,
ra - n (y)r,B - n (e 1 - y)dy ,
§ 28.
OTHER FORMS OF INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
561
where the integral Bn (o:, {3) is clearly a constant. So we conclude from (28.26) that
+ o
o o iP-
n (o:, /3) Hn ( o: {3)1a+f3 IP · l a ]P - HB(o:)H n n ( /3) Taking here v; = e x • , we see by (28.24) that the relation Bn (o:, /3) = Hn (o:)Hn (/3)/Hn (o:
+
(28.27)
{3)
must hold (cf. (25.38)), which immediately transforms (28.27) into the former of the relations (28.22). As for the latter, it is obtained by direct checking after differentiating under the integral sign. Remark 28.1. The Fourier transform of the hyperbolic Riesz potential
given by the result
J0tp is (28.28)
where q = e 2fisign x 1 if r2 ( x ) > 0 and q = 1 if r2 0, r2 ( x ) = x � - x � - · · · - x � . We conclude this subsection by consideration of the Riesz hyperbolic potential (28.21) in the two-dimensional case:
<
or
( x - y)dy1 dy2 (y� _ y� ) l - a/ 2 '
v;
=
(28.29)
=
The change Yl + Y2 2e 1 , Yl - Y2 26 of variables transforms this potential to Liouville fractional integration in each variable, which was considered in § 24:
(28.30)
562
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
where Z t = (zt + Z 2 )/2, z2 = (zt - Z2 ) / 2. Equation (28.30) can be represented in the operator form:
Ta - A - 1a/ 2, a/ 2Arp Jo'P _
1
(28.31)
++
where A is the operator of the linear change of variables: (Arp)(z) = rp(zt + z 2 , Zt z2 ) and 1:'.;· a/ 2 is the operator of the Liouville fractional integration (24.20). The following theorem is an immediate consequence of (28.31) and Theorem 24.1 on the Liouville fractional integration 1:�2 , a/ 2 .
Let n = 2, 1 � p < oo, and 1 � < oo. The operator 10 is bounded from Lp (R2 ) into Lr(R2 ), if and only if
Theorem 28. 1.
r
0 < a < 2, 1 < p < 2/a,
r = 2p/(2 - ap).
28.2. Parabolic potentials We consider negative fractional powers of the heat equation operator (28.2) in this section. As usual, we find it convenient to single out the ''time" variable by redenoting it as t and the space variables as x 1 , . . . , X n , i.e. to carry out the investigation in the ( + ! )-dimensional Euclidean space Jl!1 +1 of the points ( x , t), where z E Jl!1 and t E R1 . We shall deal with the negative fractional power of the operator
n
T
=
-.6. +
8 X 8t
(28.32)
where .6.x is the Laplacian with respect to variables Xt , . . . , X n . For the operator (28.32) we have in Fourier transforms:
Trp = ( lxl 2 - it)�(x, t)
(28.33)
where the Fourier transform is applied in Rn + 1 :
(Frp)(x, t) = �(x, t) =
j eix·�+itT rp(e, r)dedr.
(28.34)
Rn+ 1
So a negative fractional power r- a/ 2 , a > 0 , may be naturally introduced in Fourier transforms via the function ( l x l 2 - it) -a/ 2 with the choice of the principal
§ 28.
OTHER FORMS OF INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
563
value: arg ( l x l 2 - it) E ( - 7r/2, 7r/2). This function will be represented as the Fourier transform of a function defined in terms of the Gauss-Weierstrass kernel
(28.35) Let
{
t - l +af 2 W(x, t), t > 0, 1 h a (x, t) - f(a/2) t < 0. 0, _
Lemma 28.1.
(28.36)
The Fourier transform (28.34) of the function ha (x, t) is equal to (28.37)
The proof of the lemma is obtained by direct calculation:
IX·'-
. o-.. - - 1 e 1·t T dT I e - � + . t: de. h a (e T ) eu:·'-t: +1·t T tJ.edT = {4 7r)n / 21f( a/2) I T -2 0 R" 00
4�
'
The inner integral here is the product of the easily evaluated one-dimensional integrals so that further verification of a (28.37) is easy in the case of small a > 0, the general case being achieved by the usual analytic continuation with respect to
a. •
Lemma 28.1 allows us to introduce the negative fractional power of the heat equation operator T as the convolution
r-af 2 cp = Ha cp';;!
I ha (e, T)cp(x - e , t - T)dedT
R"+ 1
or in the explicit form
(28.38)
564
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
is the half-space {(z, t) : z where t 0}. That is the operator which is called the parabolic potential operator. If we use the definition
Rf-+1
(28.39)
(WT
E Rn, >
(47rT)-nf 2 J e - lel2 /(4T )
=
R•
for the Gauss-Weierstrass operator, we can rewrite the operator from in the form
(28.38),
(28.40)
Ha, as it appears
r(�/2) J0 r"1 2- 1 ( WT
( H "
=
(28.41)
for the lliesz potential) . 0 on a rather large set of functions, The operator H a is defined for any for example on functions
(25.51)
a>
> a/2. Lp(Rn+l) Theorem 28.2. The integral H 0
<
<
<
<
q =
Bessel potentials, the spaces
(28.42) of parabolic potentials may be introduced . These spaces are well defined by Theorem in the case � p < + In the next subsection we give a characterization of the spaces Ha in terms of the convergence of certain hypersingular-type integrals. We note that the spaces of type may be also considered in the case of functions f(z) defined in the half-space Rf- 1 only. Finally, we remark that similarly to what was stated above, we can consider a negative fractional power of the differential operator E - d.x + 8f8t , where E is the identity operator. In Fourier transforms we have then to deal with the function
28.2
1
( n 2)/a. ( Lp) ( 28.42) +
(28.43)
§ 28.
OTHER FORMS OF INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
565
so that the fractional power
(E - tJ. 0 ) -a/2 x+ 8t
(28.44)
defined in this way, that is the corresponding potential, relates to parabolic potential, H01cp, already considered above in the same manner as the Bessel potential G01cp relates to the Riesz potential l01cp. The fractional power is realized as the convolution with the original of the Fourier transform and has the form
(28.44) (28.43)
- 1 j T- 1-a-/2 00
- r(a/2) (compare
0
e - T ( WT
(27.20) with the Bessel potential). operator (28.45) is also called a
(28.45)
The parabolic potential. Owing to the T and, factor e- its domain in essentially larger than that of the potential in particular, it is bounded in any space L,(Rn + 1 ), � p < oo. For further information about the operator and references see notes
(28.45)
1
§ 29.2,
28.3. The realization of the fractional powers and
(
E
-
�x +
:t ) a/2 ,
a
>
(28.39) 28.2-28.3.
( -�x
+
:t ) 0112
0, in terms of a hypersingular integral
In this subsection we construct effectively the hypersingular integrals T01 I and '.t01 I, a > which are inverse to the parabolic potentials I = H01cp and I = 1l a cp defined by and So it is natural to call them the parabolic hypersingular integrals. They will contain the non-standard finite differences, which reflect the different behaviour of potentials with respect to the space variable z and the time variable t .
0, (28.39)
(28.45).
We shall present first the scheme for the formal construction of the operators and '.ta , a > inverse to the potentials H01 and 1[01 respectively. , and then justify the fact that they indeed invert the corresponding potentials. We shall use the Gauss-Weierstrass kernel below and we recall that it has the following
T01
0,
(28.35)
566
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
properties (Stein and Weiss
[3, p. 16, 24]) :
J W(x, t)dx = 1,
(28.46)
J W(y, t)W(x - y, r)dy = W(x,t + r),
(28.47)
R" R"
(28.48)
j
where
(F�
(28.49)
R"
is the Fourier transform in the space variables x. Let t) = (H or
f( x,
(
)
F�
to both parts of this
(28.50) where 1:/ 2 is the operator of the one-dimensional fractional integration ( 5.4 ) applied in respect to the variable q . Inverting the operator 1: /2 in ( 28.50 ) by means of the Marchaud fractional derivative (5.80) we arrive at the relation e tlel:l (F�
00 1 j - x(o:/2, /) "' (1) k (- 1
1
_
LJ
o
k :O
) k ( :F� f)(e, t - k q)e (t -k,)lel:l
Now we multiply by e - tl { l l and then apply the operator
dq . l q +or/2
Fi 1 , which gives
(28.51 )
'P(z, t) = x(a�2, /) j [t(z, t)+ :p - 1 ) k (!) j f(x-y, t-k71)W(y, k'l)dy] 71 ,:�/ 2 . oo
I
k-1
0
Hence after the substitution
y
-+
R"
../ky and simple transformations we have
t) j (��q.l,+f)(x, 2 / or
R.f+t
W ( y , q )dydTJ
":Jlrorf
( 28.52)
§ 28.
OTHER FORMS OF INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
567
�(-l)k (!) /(z - ../ky, t - k'l)·
(28.53)
where
(A� ,, /)(z, t) =
= (Ha ) - 1 in the form of the
Thus we have constructed the inverse operator ra hypersingular integral Similar arguments applied to the equation 1l a
(28.52).
1
j
R;+ •
= f(x, t) yield the following
(A111 '11 /)(z ' t '· e - ") , 7] d d7] d�J('!a )( t) W( y ) y / z, ' 7J l + a/ 2
where the weighted difference of the type
(28.54)
(28.53):
(A�,, I)(z,t; e - " ) = t (!) (-l) k e - k" l(x - Vky, t - k71) k :O
(28.55)
is used. Weighted differences have already occurred earlier in the elliptic case, as in It is not difficult to show that the integrals in and converge conventionally for f E at any point (x, t), provided that they are understood as
(27.56).
(28.52)
S(Rn+ l )
(28.54)
(28.56) where r: 1 and cr: 1 are the truncated integrals and with the integration over the shifted half-space R��1 {(y, 71) y E 7J > c }. We show now that the hypersingular integrals ra I and era I ' interpreted as suggested in are real inverses to the corresponding potentials f H a
=
(28.56),
Theorem 28.3.
{28.52) (28.54) : Rn,
= (Rn+ l )
= S = S(�+1)
Let I = H a
Proof. We shall base this on the representation T£a f =
j
R+•+ t
W(y, 7J) /Ct, af 2 (7J )
(28.57)
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
568
where have
K 1 , 01 (TJ) is the kernel (6.7') . We remark at once that by (6.8') and (28.46) we W(y, TJ) K1 ,at(TJ) E L 1 (R" + 1 ),
j W(y, TJ)K1,at(TJ)dydTJ 1 .
(28.58)
=
R"+l
Let us prove (28.57). Substituting the expression for the finite difference
(A� ,, f)(x, t) =
t( - l )l (!) j ha (z - ../ky, ( - k'IJ)'I'(x - z, k= O
R"+l
t - ( )dzd(,
h 01 (x, t) being the kernel (28.36) , into the integral T:X I and interchanging the order of integration, we obtain T�.. l
1
J f (Ot/2)x( Ot/2,l) R"+l x
[
1
00 ) (( - kTJ) :/ 2- 1 dTJ / k( 1 at
�(- ) k-0
'
k
E
TJ1 + / 2
j W(y, 'I)W(z - ../ky, ( - k'IJ)dy] 'l'(x - z,
R"
t - ( )dzd( .
Carrying out the change of the variable y ---+ yf-/k, k :f= and observing that W(y/Vk, TJ) k" 1 2 W(y, kTJ), by the property (28.47) of the Gauss-Weierstrass kernel we have
0,
=
T�.. l
1
J f(Ot/2)x(Ot/2, l) R"+l x
[
1
00 ) / (( - kTJ) :/ 2- 1 dTJ] k( 1 at
�(- ) k-0
'
k
E
TJ1 + / 2
W(z, ()cp(x - z, t - ( )dzd( .
Hence, after the substitutions z ---+ cz, TJ ---+ c TJ and simple calculations we arrive at (28.57) . The properties (28.58) allow the possibility to pass to a limit as c ---+ under the integral sign in (28.57) . As a result we obtain lim Te01 I =
0
Theorem
28.4. Let I = 1l 01
The proof of this theorem is similar to that of Theorem 28.3,
and is obtained
§ 28.
OTHER FORMS OF INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
569
from the representation
c:r: I =
j W(y, 7J)X:,, � (71)e-e"cp(x - .fiy, t - c71)dyd71
R+.+ •
( cf.
(28.57)), which is proved analogously to (28.57). The hypersingular integrals T01 I and '!'01 I are inverse to the potentials I = H01
of the corresponding truncated integrals. Theorem 28.5.
Then
Let 0 < a < ( n + 2)/p,
1
oo,
and I = H01
(28.59) Equation valid for
Proof.
Theorem 28.6.
(28.57), Lp, (28.57) Lp L9, n 2)p/( n 2 - ap). 28.2 (28.57) Lp (28.59). Let 1 � p < a > 0 and let I = 11.01
The proof is similar (see also references in § 29.1). 28.4. Pyramidal analogues of mixed fractional integrals and derivatives In we introduced mixed integrals and derivatives of fractional order. The domain of integration for such operators is a rectangular parallelepiped with opposite vertices x = (x�, . . . , xn ) and a = (a� , . . . , an) · In particular, it may be an octant with the vertex x. The kernels of these operators have singularities on those faces of parallelepiped which pass through the point x. Now the domain of integration will be chosen to be a certain pyramid with a vertex x and with a basis situated on the fixed hyperplane ( which does not depend on x). As regards the kernel, we assume it to have singularities on the hyperplane passing through the point x. As a result the so-called pyramidal analogues of mixed fractional integrals
§ 24
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
570
and derivatives arise which, as it will be shown below, have essential distinctions in comparison with mixed fractional integral and derivatives considered in § 24 and which are not reducible to them. See for comparison the domains of integration for mixed fractional integrals and derivatives and for their pyramidal analogues in the two-dimensional case in Figures 4 and
5.
�
�
-
�
- +-------�
-------. x(x 1,�)
Figure 4. The domain of integration of the integral
/�+
1
Figure 5. The domain of integration of the integral
1�4c
Later on we shall require some auxiliary terms and notations. Let A = ll a k ll (aj k E R1 ) be a matrix of order n x n with determinant !AI = det A =Fi 0, aj = {aj l ! . . . , aj n } be its line vectors and aj k be the elements of the inverse matrix A- 1 . Without loss of generality we put l A I = 1 . Let also A · x = (a 1 · x, . . . , an · x), (A · x) a = (a t · x) a 1 (an · x) a,. where a = ( at , . . . , an } and b = {b t , . . . , bn ) E ·Rn , c = { c 1 , . . . , en ) E Rn , -oo < bj , Cj < oo. We denote by •
•
•
Ac (b)
= { t E Rn
:
A
· { b - t) � 0, c · t � 0}
{28.60)
the n-dimensional bounded pyramid in RR with the vertex at the point b, with a basis on the hyperplane c · t = 0 and with lateral faces situated on the hyperplanes aj · (b - t) = 0, j = 1, . . . , n. In particular, if A = E = ll6j k ll is a unit matrix and c = 1 = {1, . . . , 1} then {28.60} is the simplest model pyramid of the form
E1 {b) = {t E Rn : b � t ,
t 1 ·
� 0}.
{28.61)
If n = 2 it coincides with a triangular bounded by the lines t 1 = b t , t2 = b2 and t 1 + t2 = 0 {see Figure 6). The Abel type integral equation ( see (28.65)) which will correspond to the above mentioned pyramidal analogues of mixed fractional integrals is a generalization of the equation considered by Mihlin [1, p. 48] . The next proposition contains conditions of non-emptiness and boundedness of the pyramid {28.60) and the expression for interchanging the order of integration, similar to the Dirichlet formula ( 1 .32) .
§ 28.
OTHER FORMS OF INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
Figure 6. The domain of integration of the integral
571
181 cp
The pyramid Ac (b) given by (28.60) is non-empty {bounded) in Rn if and only if A- 1 c · b > 0 {A - 1 c > 0, respectively). The proof of this Lemma follows from the fact that the linear transform t - A- 1 t, b - A- 1 b maps the pyramid Ac (b) into the pyramid
Lemma 28.2.
(28.62) Lemma 28.3. If a function f(t, T) given on Ac (b) x Ac (b) is measurable then the following expression for interchanging the order of integration
J dt J j(t, T)dT = J dT J Ac(b)
is true, where u
Ac(b)
Ac(t)
(b, T)
j(t, T)dt,
(28.63)
u(b,T)
= {t E Rn : A · T � A · t � A · b},
under the assumption that one of the repeated integrals in convergent.
(28.64)
(28.63)
The proof is obtained directly by Fubini's Theorem 1 . 1 .
Now we consider the Abel-type integral equation on the pyramid 1
J
cp(t)dt (A . (x - t)p- a = f(x),
is absolutely Ac (b)
X E A c (b),
(28.65)
where < a < 1 (which means < Q l < 1 , . . . , 0 < O:n < 1), r (a: ) and x < b (z 1 < b l J . . . , zn < bn ) ·
= r(at ) . . . r(a:t)
r(a)
0
Ac(z)
0
572
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
In particular if Ac(b)
= Et (b) (28.65) has the form
1
f(a)
J (zcp(t)dt - t) l - cr = /(z),
z E Et(b),
(28.66)
E 1 (z)
which does not coincide with the Abel multi-dimensional equation (24.1). Therefore (24. 1) is not a particular case of (28.65). However the method which was used in § 2.1 may be applied for inverting (28.65). Following this approach we replace t by r and by t, respectively in (28.65) , multiply both parts of the resulting relation by (A · t)) - cr and integrate over the pyramid Ac(z). Applying Lemma 28.3 we have
z (z -
l f( <>)
j tp(r)dr j (A · (z - t))- a (A · (t - r))0- 1 dt = j (A · (z - t)) -a f(t)dt
Ac(z)
Ac(z)
e1(z,r)
(28.67) where the domain r) is given by (28.64). To evaluate the inner integral in (28.67) we introduce the new variables s; = [a; · t)]/[a; · r)]. Taking the equalities 1 - s; = [a; · (t - r)]/[a; · ( x - r)] and (1.68) and ( 1.69) into account we obtain
u(z,
(z -
(z -
n 1 sj 0; (1 - s;) a;- l ds; j (A · (z - t)) -a(A · (t - r))a- l dt = JgJ 0
e1(z ,r)
(28.68)
= f(a)f( l - a). Hence (28.67) may be rewritten in the form
J cp(t)dt =
Ac(z)
J (A · _ a)
1 f(1
( z - t))
_ 0 f(t)dt def := ft
Ac(z)
- cr (z).
(28.69)
Here we change the variables
(
)
1 . ! , X = X l ' . . . ' Xn ' At = A - 1 . �� = X d d d dt dn where
d = (dt , . . . , dn ) is given by (28.62).
(28.70)
Then in accordance with Lemma 28.2
§ 28.
OTHER FORMS OF INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
573
(28.69) is equivalent to
I
.,P( r)dr = g (y) ,
(28.71)
E1(y )
where E1 (y)
is the pyramid (28.61) and
(
.,P ( r) = tp A - 1
·
�) ,
( · �) IIn d�c . k= 1
g (y) = h -a A - 1
(28.72)
To invert (28.71) we rewrite it in the form
.,P ( r) dr
= g(y).
(28.73)
Successive differentiation of this expression with respect to Yn , Yn - 1 , . . . , Y1 yields the relation
.,P(y) Here we change the variable z f)
=
= A- 1 n
-1
f) ·
Y1
{)R · ·
·
f)
Yn
g (y).
� similarly to (28.70) so that
f)
aj k -- "' {) LJ dk {)Xj , k = 1 , 2, . . . , n . Yk i= 1
(28.74)
Then finally we obtain the following inversion relation for (28.65) :
(
n n {) 1 (z) = cp f( 1 - a) II � aj k fJxJ. k=1 =1 J
)
I (A . (x - t))-a f(t)dt.
Ac(x)
= E1 (b) then (28.75) has the form
In particular, if A c (b)
tp
(x)
= f(1 1_ a) fJax I (x - t) -af(t)dt E 1 (x)
where
:x
=
8 1 ••• 8
:
(28.75)
!
•
.
(28.76)
574
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
Now we give a justification of the solvability of (28.65) in the space Lt(Ae(b)). For this goal we introduce the notation
IA. (L ) = { ,
g :
g(:r ) =
I Ac
(z )
h (t)dt, h (t) E L , (A. (b)) }
(28.77)
and observe that if g then there exist partial derivatives of g up to order almost everywhere on Ac ( b) and
E lAJLt)
n
( [!n {;n
ii; t
0
)
O:r; g( :r ) = h (x).
(28.78)
The following statement is an analogue of Theorem 2. 1 .
The Abel-type equation Lt (Ae(b)) if and only if
Theorem 28.7 .
11 -a (:r ) � r ( l � a)
(28.65)
with
0<
a < 1 is solvable in
(A . (:r - t)) - Q f(t) dt E IA.(L l ), I Ac ·
(z )
n ft -a (z) lc·z= O = L: a-jn Oa · ft - a (z ) lc · z=O = XJ j:l 0 ) n (n = IT L Ctjk 8 x · fi - a (x) lc · z=O = 0. J k =2 j= l
(28.79)
· · ·
(28.80)
These conditions being satisfied (28.65) has a unique solution given by (28.75) .
=
Proof. In the model case Ac (b) E1(b) the theorem follows from (28.71) and (28.73). In the case of an arbitrary pyramid A c (b) it is obtained from (28.71) and (28.73) after the change of variables (28.70) with the property (28.74) being taken into account. • Corollary.
Equation (28.66) is solvable in L1 (E1(b)) if and only if 11 -a (:r ) = r ( l �
a) I (x - t) - Q f(t)dt E LE, (L l ), Et (z )
(28.81)
§ 28.
8
575
OTHER FORMS OF INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
i l·z=O = Xn lt - a (x) l l ·z=O =
ft - a (z) h-z=O = 8X ft - a (x) n = aaX
2
...
a
·
·
·
a
(28.82)
0.
These conditions being satisfied (28.66) has a unique solution given by (28.76). Theorem 28.7 gives the criterion of solvability for the Abel-type equation (28.65) in terms of the auxiliary function fl - a (x). Simple sufficient solvability conditions in terms of the function f(x) itself are given in Theorem 28.8 and its
Corollary.
Theorem 28.8.
order n and
Let the function f(x) have continuous partial derivatives up to v11 f(x) l c ·z=O = 0 ,
(28.83) Then the Abel-type equation (28.65) is solvable in Lt(A c (b)) and its unique solution is representable in the form
a
j (A . (x - t))-a k=IIl ( J?== l ai k 7Jt.J ) f(t)dt.
1
f( l - a )
0 $ I.BI $ n - 1.
"
"
(28.84)
Ac(z)
Proof. First we consider the model equation represent fl - a (x) as
ft - a (x) = r(l �
o
)
Similarly to
(28 .73)
we
J (x - w af(t)dt
E 1 (z)
j
Zn-1 X
- (z 1 +· · ·+zn-�+ t n ) X
(28.66).
(X n - 1 - t n_ I ) -a"- 1 dtn - 1
. . •
7
- (t�+· · ·+t .. )
Carrying out the successive integration by parts and taking
(28.83)
into account
576
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
we have
1 !t -a (x) = f(1 - a )
J�
Et ( )
(x - t) 1 - cr of(t) dt. (1 - a) ot
(28.85)
The function (28.85) satisfies (28.81) and (28.82). Indeed, the former is clear, while the latter is checked by successive differentiation of (28.85) with respect to Xn , Xn - 1 , , x2 . Hence according to the Corollary to Theorem 28.7 we obtain the statement of the theorem for the model equation (28.66). The general equation (28.65) is reduced to the model one by means of the change of variable (28.70). The theorem is proved. • . . •
Corollary.
and
If the function f(x) has a continuous partial derivatives up to order n v13 f(x) h-�= 0 = 0,
0�
l.Bl � n - 1
(28.86)
then (28.66) has a unique solution given by the relation
J
(x - t)
-a
0
Et(�)
0 dt. 1 t . . . tn
an f(t)
(28.87)
Remark 28.2. Equation (28.71) is an example of an integral equation of the first kind arising in the problems of integral geometry where the unknown function is to be restored by its known integrals over some sets, see for example, Gel'fand, Graev and Vilenkin [1, p. 111]. Proceeding from (28.65) and (28.75) we introduce the operators
( f.t
J (A . (x - t)) l - cr ( n n (VAc f)(x ) = f(1 1- a ) lJ ( � a_ ; k ox; ) J k - 1 J- 1 A c:(� )
0
0
I
A c: (�)
a > 0,
f(t)dt (A · (x - t)) cr '
(28.88) (28.89)
0 < a < 1,
which we shall call pyramidal analogues
of the Riemann-Liouville mixed fractional integrals and derivatives of order a = ( a 1 , . . . , an ) , cf. (24.5) and (24.9). Expressions (28.88) and (28.89) are defined for functions given on A c (b). Theorems 28.7 and 28.8 contain conditions for the existence of the mixed fractional derivative (28.89). In particular, if a function f has continuous partial
§ 28.
OTHER FORMS OF INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
577
n
derivatives up to order and (28.83) hold, then the mixed fractional derivative (28.89) is representable in the form (V�J) ( x ) = r(l
� a) j
Ac(r)
(A · ( x -
t))- a ft c t= a;k O�J- ) !(t) dt . k=l J l
(28.90)
With the aid of (28.67) one may check the semigroup property
(28.91)
fJ1 ,
. . . , an + f3n ) · for any function
a
1
0
(1JE1 f)(x) = f ( 1 - a) o x
f(t) dt J (x - t)a '
E1(r)
We shall call them the
a > 0,
(28.92)
O < a < l.
(28.93)
model pyramidal analogues of the Riemann-Liouville mixed fractional integrals and derivatives of order a. In the case a k > 1 , we introduce the model pyramidal analogues of mixed fractional derivatives similarly to (24 . 10 ) by the relation
(28.94) where
(!_) [a] (_!____ ) [at] . ( .!_ [a,.] OXn ) OX 1 OX . .
=
Below only the operators Example 28.1. Let
(28.92)-(28 .94) will be considered.
(t) = (t 1 +
· · ·
t
+ n ).B 1 , a > 0. Then -
l i +.B 1 (IE1a
1
{3 > 0,
(28.95)
578
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
f a 1 /)( X ) - f (P) ( X t + · · · + Xn ) P - lai - t , ("" vE (P I a I} _
(28.96}
_
where l a l = a 1 + · · · + an . This example shows that the model pyramidal analogues of mixed fractional integrals and derivatives (28.92} and (28.94} keep power behaviour invariant - i.e. transform power functions into power functions - on the hyperplane x 1 +· · · + x n = 0 which is the basis of the pyramid E1 (x) . Unlike this, mixed fractional integrals and derivatives (24.5} and (24.9} keep power behaviour invariant on the hyperplanes x1c = a1c , k = 1 , . . . , n , since
f a (t - a)/3 - l )(x) = f {,B} (x - a) a +/3 - l , a > 0 , (Ia+ ( a + P)
�(�)a) (
(V�+ (t - a) P - 1 )( z ) = f (
z -
a fJ
> 0,
{28.97}
a)P -a- 1 , a > 0, {J > a,
(28.98)
Similarly to (24.6} and (24.9} we may introduce the model pyramidal analogues of mix�d fractional integrals and derivatives with respect to some of the variables. Let
x = (x', x"), x' = {xt , . . . , Xm ), x" = (xm+b . . . , Xn }, a' = (at , . . . , am , O, . . . , O), E� ( x) = {t
E Rn
:
t' � x', t" = x" , t' · 1 + x' · 1 � 0}.
(28.99}
Then we put
1 ( J_E 1
f (x' - t')a - 1 cp(t', x")dt', I
( )
a' > 0,
{28.100}
E� (x)
{) [a 1] + 1 � 1 ('D£1 /}(x} = o (1�:- [a ] - 1 /}(x}, a' > 0, x
(28. 101}
where [a'] = ([at], . . . , [am], 0, . . . , 0). In particular, if x" = (x2, . . . , xn ) then (28.100} and (28.101} coincide with the one-dimensional fractional integrals (2.17}
§ 28. and derivatives
OTHER FORMS OF INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION
579
(2.29):
(IE: cp)(x) = (I�(x� +··+x ,. )
(28.102) (28.103)
if x" is fixed. The above arguments show that pyramidal analogues of mixed fractional integrals and derivatives are specific constructions different from mixed fractional integrals and derivatives. In particular, they may not be represented as a tensor product of one-dimensional fractional integrals. However, some properties of one-dimensional fractional .integrals and derivatives may be transferred to such operators. For example, the index law (28.91) is valid. An analogue of Hardy Littlewood Theorem 5.3 is also true. To formulate it we consider the case of two variables just as was done in § 24.4. We introduce the space Lp 1 ,p� (Et(b)) of functions ( x 1 , x ) equipped with the norm
f
2
(28.104) The following theorem is a corollary of Theorem 24.1.
If 1 < Pi < 1/o:j and 1/qi = 1/Pi - O:j , j = 1, 2, then the operator of the pyramidal analogue (28.92) of the mixed fractional integral is bounded from Lp 1 ,p� (Et(b)) into L91 , 9� (E1 (b)).
Theorem 28.9.
cp(t)
cp(t 1 , t2 ) t t 2 {( t, 2) R
Proof. Let given on the E Lp 1 ,p � (Et(b)). We define the function triangle E1 (b) (see Figure 3) to be zero on the rectangle ll(b) = E : < bt , -b } . Let = < b x E Et(b); < < t 0, x E ll(b) \ Et(b)} -� {
t2
XE1 (b)
IIIE.
The theorem is proved.
•
580
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
§ 29. Bibliographical Remarks and Additional Information to Chapter 5 29. 1 . Historical notes Notes to § 24.1. The solution of the multidimensional Abel equation {24.1) was probably known long ago, even though it was not found in the early publications. It is natural to suppose that it was already known to Holmgren [1] {1865-1866) - see the paragraph below. The Laplace-transform method of solving {24.1) may be found in Vasilache [1] {1953) for n = 2 and in Delerue [1] {1953) for an arbitrary n. Notes to § 24.2. There are many papers where partial or mixed fractional integra differentiation, in each variable or in a part of them, is "introduced" . It is worth emphasizing that these concepts arose long ago, and the first person who indeed introduced Riemann-Liouville fractional integra-differentiation for functions of two variables was Holmgren [1 , p. 14] (18651866)). These ideas were essentially used in problems of the function theory by Montel [1 , p. 172] (1918) yet. Notes to § 24 .4. Details about the spaces Lp with mixed norm may be found in the books by Besov, D'in and Nikol'skii [1 , ch. 1] (1975) and in the paper by Benedek and Panzone [1] (1961). The idea of considering fractional integration in the spaces Lp is contained in the latter paper where it was realized for the Riesz potential operators. The boundedness from Lp of mixed fractional integration, into L q , qi = Pi (1 - c::tj pi )- 1 , directly for the operators 1: 1 ® and similarly for partial fractional integration, was noted by Skorikov [3] (1977), the case of an arbitrary number of variables was observed by Magaril-ll'yaev [1] (1979), although it was probably known earlier. Notes to § 24.5. The existence of relations between different fractional integration operators via the bisingular operator was first noted by Pilidi [1] (1968). In particular, he gave (24.30) for cp e Lp with 1 p min(a j 1 , a ; 1 ). Relations (24.30)-(24.32) for cp L;; were given by Skorikov [3] (1977). Notes to § 24.6. Partial and mixed Marchaud fractional derivatives (24.33)-(24.35) in the case of two variables appeared in Marchaud [1] (1927). Fractional integra-differentiation in a direction for functions of many variables was first introduced by Kipriyanov [1]-[6] (195�1967) in a form different from (24.38) and (24.39) (refer also to § 29.2, note 24.3). Notes to § 24.7. Theorem 24.4 in a sli ghtly weaker form was proved by Skorikov (3] (1977). Notes to § 24.8. The relations of this subsection are well known and are easily derived from the corresponding one-dimensional results. There are a number of papers which contain detailed proofs of these results, mostly in the case of two variables, as for example, Jain [1] {1970) where {24.56) is contained. The expressions in (24.52) and (24.53) with 2 may be found in Raina and Kiryakova [1] (1983). Notes to § 24.9. The space � . discussed here, was introduced and investigated by Lizorkin [1] (1963). It was considered also by Yoshinaga [1] (1964). Notes to § 24 .10. Weyl-type partial and mixed fractional derivatives appeared first in Bessonov [1] (1964). There, for functions J in Lp the author considered whether there exist in Lp certain partial or mixed derivatives, if there exist in Lp some other such derivatives (see § 29.2, note 24.5). The detailed and complete investigation of fractional differentiability of periodic functions of many variables was undertaken by Lizorkin and Nikol'skii [1] (1965) on the basis of Lp-spaces. Refer also to Nikol'skaya [1] (1974), where the problem of the existence of mixed Weyl fractional derivatives is related to the rate of convergence of partial sums of multiple Fourier series. Theorem 24.7 is a slight modification of theorem 4 from Lizorkin and Nikol'skii [1]. Notes to § 24.1 1 . The definitions (24 .65) and (24.66) seem not to have been introduced elsewhere. Theorem 24.8 may be considered as new.
1:2
E
< <
n=
§ 29. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 5
581
JCOt
Notes to § 24. 12. The polypotentiaiS of type were introduced by Okikiolu [5) (1969), in a more general form with power weights, though. The connection between the polypotentials and·1{0t in the form {24.69) not been noted earlier. Notes to § 25.1 and 25 .2. Relation (25.1 1) is usually connected with the name of Bochner [1, p. 263 and 315] , whereas (25.14) and {25.14') for the Fourier transform of radial functions in terms of fractional integration were given by Leray [1] (1953). The space � defined in (25.16} firstly appeared in Semyanistyi [1] (1960}. Afterwards Lizorkin [1] {1963}, and also [5) {1969}, [8] (1972), gave a thorough investigation of spaces of such a kind, together with application in the theory of functional spaces with fractional smoothness. Since then such spaces have become objects of current research and are often used in mathematical literature. We remark that this particular space appeared also in Helgason [1 , p. 162] (1965). In the book of Helgason [2, p. 20, 59, 62] {1983), who it appears was unaware of Lizorkin's papers, the invariance of the space � relative to the Riesz potential operator was proved in connection with its applications in the theory of the Radon transform. Relation (25.25} is fomally known long ago, its justification in the sense of distributions on was given by Schwarts [1, t. 2, p. 1 14] (1951) . The result obtained there was different from (25.25) by the polynomial summand in the second line, which is orthogonal to � (see Remark 25.2). The interpretation of the Fourier transform of the function in the sense of distributions on � was suggested by Semyanistyi [1] (1960), and refer also to Lizorkin [8, p. 242] (1972). A potential with the kernel first appeared in the thesis of Frostman [1] (1935} devoted to the problem of the existence of the unique equilibrium potential of a compact set in This potential was introduced by Riesz, who was Frostman's teacher - Riesz [2] (1936} and [4) (1938}, and also [5] (1939} and [6] (1949}. (In pointing out the role of this outstanding mathematician we would like to mention here his obituary written by Girding [2] and the paper by Mikolas [9] with brief remarks on Riesz's works). We do not concern ourselves here with the connections of Riesz potentials with superharmonic functions but refer to Landkof [1] . The invariance of the space � defined in (25.16} relative to the Riesz potential was noted by Semyanistyi [1] (1960) and Lizorkin [1] (1963). Notes to § 25.3. Theorem 25.2 is due to Sobolev [1] (1938). The proof of necessity part follows Stein [2, p. 140]. The proof of Theorem 25.2 based on convexity theorems was later suggested by Thorin [1], 1948. An elementary argument immediately reducing the Sobolev theorem to the case n = 1 , was suggested by du Plessis [2] (1955} (see § 29.2, note 25.2). Muckenhoupt and Stein [1] ( 1965} gave the proof based on the interpolation of linear operators. This proof is given in Stein's book (2]. A rather simple proof which is well-suited for all n 2:: 1 was given by Hedberg [1] (1972). We refer also a development of Hedberg's idea in a more general situation in Meda [1]. We also mention Yoshikawa [1], who obtained the statement of the Sobolev theorem as a corollary of a general similar result for fractional powers of the form
JCOt
has
S(Rn )
lx l - a
l x l a -n
Rn .
A -a = r(a) - 1 J ta-l Tt /1 Tt lli=ln lx1p• (lx'l2 lx"I2 PI 2 x' = (xt, ... ,xm ) x" (xm+ t t ... ,xn ) 00
f
0
being a semigroup of operators satisfying certain assumptions . .
Theorem 25.3 was proved by Stein and Weiss [1] (1958). Similar theorems with weight or
+
with
and
=
were proved by
Nilrolaev [1], [2] (1973). Theorem 25.4 i s due t o Muckenhoupt and Wheeden [2] (1974). A simpler proof of this theorem can be found in Weiland [3). A simple proof and even in a more general case of the so called anisotropic Riesz potentials was given by Kolcilashvili and Gabidzashvili [1] (1985} - see also Kokilashvili [2, p. 36-54) (1985). There are also other generalizations (the so-called two-weighted ones and others) : see § 29.2, notes 25.7 and 25.8. The weak type estimate (25.46} for Riesz potentials was revealed by Zygmund [4) (1956). Theorem 25.5 was obtained by Valrulov [1,2] (1986). Theorem 25.6 was proved by Stein and Weiss [2, p. 57] (1960) in the case of the Poisson integral and by Johnson [1] (1973) in the case of the Gauss-Weierstrass integral. r-Jotes to § 25.4. The realization of Riesz differentiation in the form of the hypersingular integral (25.62) appeared first in Stein [1] {1961) in the case 0 2. The general case > 0 was considered by Lizorlcin [6] (1970) who introduced the hypersingular integrals
a
F-1 1elaF'P< a <
582
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
(25.61) with a centered difference. Lizorkin [6) indeed defined an entity more general than (25.61 ) , which corresponds t o the �called anisotropic case. H e characterized the space of anisotropic Bessel potentials in terms of such anisotropic hypersingular integrals. The Fourier transform of a hypersingular integral, that is (25.63), was studied by Lizorkin (6, p. 82] in the case of centered differences, and by Samko (17, p. 1170) (1976) in the case of non-centered differences. Expressions (25.69) and (25.70) for inverting Riesz potentials f = [01
O(x, y)
E
( 'Jiy) lxl� ,
§ 29. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 5
583
of order less than a, which are acquired Wlder this closure. In particular, in Samko's papers there are obtained both Lemma 26.5 {[31 , p. 78]), the characterization of the space Ia (Lp) presented in Theorem 26.8 ([17), [18], (1976) and [31 , § 13], (1984)}, Theorem 26.9 ([23] (1977)), and the estimates (26.98}-(26.99) ([17) (1976)). The spaces Lp,r (Rn ) arose as a natural generalization of the spaces of Riesz and Bessel potentials coinciding with the former if r = np/(n - ap), and with the latter if r = p. They were investigated in Samko [17] (1976) and [20) (1977). Theorem 26.10 was proved in Rubin [23] , [26], (198�1987), (26.971 ) with different p and q was proved in Samko [34]-[35] (1990) and the statements (26.98) and (26.981 } were given in Samko [17) (1976). , Notes to § 27.1. The fractional powers (E - /i) -a/2 became named Bessel potentials after the papen by Aronzajn and Smith [1) (1961), Calderon [1] (1961), Aronzajn, Mulla and Szeptycki [1) (1963), Aronzajn [1) (1965) and Adams, Aronzajn and Smith [1] (1967). The Bessel kernel as the Fourier original (in the sense of distributions) of the fWlction (1 + lxl) -a/ 2 was considered in L. Schwartz [1 , vol. 2, p. 116] (1951 ). Notes to § 27.2. Theorem 27.1 and the modification � a
t
t
D
D is
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
584
being specially devoted to the Fourier-Laplace transfonn of functions depending on the Lorentz distance. The statement of Theorem 28.1 should be considered as known, but the authors cannot find the corresponding reference. The realization of fractional powers of differential operators is closely connected with the investigation of "generalized" functions IP(x)l\ where P(x) is a polynomial. In this connection we can refer to the following papers: Gel'fand and Graev [1] (1955), Fedoryuk (1] (1959), Bresters [1] (1969), Bernstein and Gel'fand [1] (1969), Atiyah [1] (1970) and Palamodov [1] (1980), and also the book by Gel'fand and Shilov [2, ch. Ill, § 4) , which contains some results for arbitrary functions raised to the power �. Notes to § 28.2. The parabolic potentials H011p and 1{011(), - (28.39) and (28.45) - were introduced by .Jones [1] (1968) in connection with investigations of the heat-type equations. The further study of these potentials and of the spaces H01(Lp) and 1f.01(Lp) was undertaken by Sampson [1] (1968), Bagby (1] (1971) and (2] (1974), Gopala Rao [1] (1977) and (2] (1978), Chanillo [1] (1981), Nogin [2] (1981) and (5) (1982) and Nogin and Rubin [1], [2] (1985) and (4] , (5] (1986). The proof of Theorem 28.2 can be found in Gopala Rao (1] (1977). Notes to § 28.3. We followed here Nogin (2] (1981) and Nogin and Rubin [1] (1985) and [4] (1986). Notes to § 28.4. The Abel-type integral equation (28.65) in the particular case n = 2,
I � �II
and = "2 = 1/2 was first solved by Mihlin in 1940 in connection with the 1 problems arising in investigations of wave reflection from a rectilinear boundary. For this we refer to Mihlin [1, p. 48) and references in Preobrazhenskii (1 , p. 9], and also applications of equations of such a type to problems of supersonic flow over space angles in Fedosov [1]). The solution of (28.65) in the case of an arbitrary natural number n and c =
A=
"1
k -1
� (0, . . . , 0, 1 , 0, . . . , 0) was obtained in Kilbas and Vu Kim Tuan (1] (1982). The other results of this subsection, in particular, the definition and the properties of the pyramidal analogues of mixed functional integrals and derivatives are published here for the first time.
29.2. Survey of other results (relating to § § 24-28} .. _ 1(), at = Raina (3] dealt with the evaluation of the mixed fractional integrals , atn ) , of functions of the form IP(t) = exp(-Epiti)P(Eti), P being a polynomial, in terms of some special functions. This is an extension of the one-dimensional result of H.M. Srivastava [4], (see § 9.2, note 5.5 in this connection). His result was corrected and further developed by R. Srivastava [1]. We observe also that the mixed fractional integrals (24.6) were used by Kosdunieder [1],
1� .
24.1.
(atb
• • •
F�n)
[2] to derive some properties of the Lauricella hypergeometric function of n variables Prudnikov, Brychlrov and Marichev [2, p. 745) . . 24.2. Erdelyi-Kober-type modifications of fractional integration in the case of two variables l: ® were given by Verma [1] and Mourya (1]. Namely, the operators Ig · l l: ® Ig+ · l '1 ' + .� , .� , ,, (in the notation of §§ 18.1 and 24.3) and some others were introduced. Mourya [1] established the main properties of these operators, and gave applications to some special functions. We observe that there is a misprint on p. 173 and errors on p. 175 of this paper. Verma (1] considered the two-dimensional Mellin transform of mixed Erdelyi-Kober fractional integrals. Various compositions of two operators of such a type were studied by Raina (2). Mixed Erdelyi-Kober fractional integrals were used in Verma [2], [3] to study properties of the two-dimensional integral transform generalizing the two-dimensional Hankel transfonn. Kaul (1] introduced modifications of generalized fractional integration of the Saxena-type (23.5) and (23.6) for the case of two variables, and gave the expression for their Mellin transform J
J
1� . 1 J
1� . 1
§ 29. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER
5
585
and the expression of fractional integration by parts. These results were extended to the case of more general multidimensional operators by Saxena and Modi [1] and Mathur and Krishna [1].
24.3. A number of papers by Kipriyanov [1)-[5) dealt with the fractional derivative /�a) (z) , < a < 1, of a function / ( z) at the point z nn in the direction from the point a nn . The initial definition of such a derivative by Kipriyanov says that /�a) (z) is a function satisfying the
E
0
E
relation
(29.1) where e is the unit vector in the direction from
Kipriyanov
a to i.e. e = (z - a)/lz - a!. As was shown by [2]-[3] this definition yields the following relation for /�a) (z) :
fa(a) (z) - r(1 a- a)
(cf.
lz -a l
J 0
z,
(
)
/ (z) - f+(z - ee) 1 - e -. n- 1 + r(n ) /(z) - /(a) (29.2) el a l al r (n - a) l z - al 1 +a -n _
z -
(24.3811)). In the papers [1)-[5] Kipriyanov studied various properties of such fractional derivatives and investigated spaces of functions in the domain n c nn having fractional derivatives in all directions. ReJations of these spaces to the Sobolev spaces wt(n) were shown. We mention some of these results, e.g. [3].
/�a) (z) exists, is continuous and bounded for ( a) E 0 a) J sup 1/� (z) ld:c < oo and a > 1/p, then /(z) E H; -1 /P , p > 1. o aen 1.
If
x,
2. If
0 < a < ,\ � 1 and continuous in respect to ( z, a).
x
0, then
/ (z) E Ha ( O) ; if
/ (x) E H� (O) , then Ji )( ) exists for all (x,a) E 0 a
x
x
0
and is
c(a) (O) be the space of functions continuous on 0 , such that /�a) (z) is continuous with respect to (z, a) E 0 0 and let 11/ll c
Let
c
X
- Kipriyanov (Sa]. We note that the operator
also
� aP /(z)
=
p
J (p2 - -r2)-a /(a + -rw)-rn-l d-r w, lwl p (29.3)l a l a
1 d pn -1-a r ( 1 - a) dp
0
of fractional differentiation in a given direction = 1, with was investigated by Kipriyanov (7]. He showed that the operator + �pa /(z) = 2p1 a
r(1 - a )
P
J 0
=
x -
,
can
being a fixed point, be transfonned to
( p ) n -1 d-r r(n-r(n)a) /p(z)a
J(x) - /(a + -rw) !:.
(p2 - -r2 ) 1 +a
(29.3)
+
'
p
=
lz - al,
586
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
(cf. (29.2) and (24.3811) ) and the operator inverse to (29.3)
can
be given in the form
Moreover, the operator �� was used in this paper to construct spaces of the L a ) (O)-type of fractionally differentiable functions, which are compactly imbedded into the Sobolev spaces wt (O) under the appropriate assumptions on p, l, q and a. 24:.4:. Liouville fractional partial and mixed derivatives (24.15) , treated in the sense of distributions: (D +. . J, tp) = (f, D� . _ IP) , tp � with � being the space (25.461), were ' introduced by Lizorkin [ . Lizorkin and Nikol'skii [1] introduced the spaces s; L(Rn ) = s; (Rn ) with dominating mixed derivatives. The space s; (Rn), a = (ab . . . , an ) , consists of functions J Lp (R") with the mixed derivative V+. .. . + J Lp (Rn ) and with all support derivatives in
�
.
E
.
.
�
E E
.
Lp (Rn ). The •upport deri'llati'lle for + J is the derivative ... + ! where a is obtained from a = (a t , . . . , an ) by replacing some of a1c by 0. It was shown in this paper that
Vt
..
s; = Ga(Lp ),
Vi
a > 0, 1 < p < oo ,
(29.4)
where aa (Lp ) is the space (24.74) of polypotentials (24.72). In the paper by Nikol'ska.ya (1] the character of the approximation of a function J s; (Rn ) by its partial Fourier sums was investigated. Brychkov (1] considered the spaces s; for all a Rn, defined as distributions, and proved (29.4) under the appropriate interpretation of the left- and right-hand sides. The concept of smoothness order of the generalized functions in s; with respect to a part of variables was introduced in this paper (see also Brychkov [2] in this connection) , and the relation of this order to the existence of the trace of a generalized function on hyperplane was shown. 24:.5. Let f(x) be a 211"-periodic function of many variables and let v ( a ) J, a = (a t ' . . . , a n ) be the Weyl fractional derivative (24.60) , (24.62). The following statement was proved by Bessonov [1]. Let J Lp (�), � = {x : 0 � x; < 21r} , 1 < p < oo. H there exist v ( a ) J Lp (�) and v (f1) J Lp (�), ai � 0, f3i � O, then Lp(�) for 'Y = Oa + ( 1 - 0){3, 0 5 0 5 1. A certain generalization of this statement was obtained by Nikol'skii [5], p. 238. .. _ J, {3 = 24:.6. A similar question on the existence of some fractional derivatives i (f3t , . . . , f3n ) when there exist some other such derivatives of certain orders a = ( a , . . . , a� ) was considered in a general form by Magaril-D'yaev [1] in the non-periodic case in the general context of the spaces Lp(Rn ) with mixed norm. This is the so-called problem of the intermediate derivative. This question is connected with the multiplicative inequalities for fractional derivatives, the validity of which was completely investigated in this paper. The development of the results for the problem of intermediate derivative may be seen in the paper [2] by the same author, where it was given in certain generalized terms. ' 24:.7. Fractional differentiation on the manifolds M = rn X Ir"" i.e. on the product of a certain number of circles and axes, was considered by Magaril-D'yaev and Tikhomirov [2] in the presentation of some questions of the hannonic analysis on such manifolds. It was defined by using the analogue of the Lizorkin-type space � adapted to circles and axes forming M. The problem of the intermediate derivative, Bernstein-Nikol'skii and Favard inequalities for fractional derivatives and other questions were considered in the mixed norm spaces Lp(M). 24:.8. The Bernstein-type theorem for mixed fractional derivatives of a function f(x, y) oftwo variables was already given by Montel [1, p. 187], in the following form: if lf(x, y) - Pn , m (x, y)l 5 + Bn -6 , lxl < 1, IYI < 1, 'Y > 0, 6 > 0, where Pn , m (x, y) is an algebraic polynomial, then f(x, y) has all mixed fractional derivatives of order (a, {3) such that a/"'f + {3/6 < 1, a > 0, {3 > 0. 24:.9 . The connection between the existence in Lp of the mixed Weyl fractional derivative
E E
E
E
E
V�'YJj E
V�
.
i
Am-'Y
V�.,t 'a2) J of a function f(xl , x2 ) of two variables, and the behaviour of its partial Fourier sums and mixed continuity modulus was considered by Esmaganbetov [2].
§ 29. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER
5
587
24.10. Let a function f(x) , considered in the domain 0 C Rn , be the restriction onto 0 of a function g(x) which in the whole space Rn belongs to the Bessel potential space Lp (� ) (§ 27). The characterization of such functions f(x) in tenns of partial Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives, or more generally, Chen derivatives {18.18), was noted by Skorikov [2] (see § 23.2, note 18.14 in the case n = 1). Some considerations in similar situations in the case n = 2 were developed by Biacino and Miserendino [1]-[3], Biachino, Di Giorgio and Miserendino [1] and Biachino [1]. We also mention Miserendino [1], [2] where for functions in L�(O) with an integer a and a parallelepiped 0 in Rn the author investigated the problem of the existence of mixed fractional derivatives at the points of the boundary 80 and their belonging to the space L 2 (80). 24.11. The definition of Griinwald-Letnikov differentiation given in § 24.11 for functions defined in the whole space Rn , can be adapted to functions defined in a region. This is realized in a similar fashion to § 20.4, where Griinwald-Letnikov fractional differentiation on the finite interval was defined. In the case of two variables the definition, generalizing {20.42), has the fonn
{29.5) where a = (a 2 , a 2 ), a = (a t , a 2 ) and x 1 � a lt x2 � a2. Such a definition was used by Krasnov [1], who gave some properties of the fractional derivatives {29.5). The development of this definition for the case of analytic functions given in the region G C � may be found in Krasnov and Foht [1]. Such an approach to fractional derivatives of functions of many variables was considered in this paper in connection with the derivation of certain integral estimates for solutions of elliptic differential equations. This was earlier studied in Foht and Krasnov [1] in the case of the Laplace equation. In the latter paper the definition of fractional differentiation of analytic functions was used, reduced to fractional differentiation of monomials xi , j = (it , . . . ,jn ), but the authors discarded all the monomials with ik < a if only for one k = 1, . . . , n. a 24.12. Mixed fractional differentiation !:5\ !,..01 .., 5". BZ•"+l1 with the fractional power
u;
B::::
u..,l
• • •
u
-Grs t/v,
+
of the Bessel differential.operator By = + k > 0, was used by Brodskii to define certain function spaces with fractional s�oothnes� in the half-space. 24.13. The estimate
O
[1], [2]
211" , p
-
for fractional differentiation {24.48' ) in the given direction w and the function /(x) of the exponential type p was given by Wilmes [1], [2] (see also § 23.2, note 20.5). The case r = 1r /p, 0 < a < 1, yields the Bernstein inequality with the constant 21 - a . 25.1 . The Lizorkin space {25.16) consists of Schwartzian functions J S with the Fourier transform vanishing at the origin. The similar space � , adapted to partial fractional derivatives and integrals (see § 24.9) is related to the vanishing of the Fourier transfonns on the coordinate hyperplanes. In some other problems a necessity arises to deal with the Lizorkin-type space �V of Schwartzian functions such that (l> k cp)(x) = 0, lkl = 0, 1, 2, . . . , x V, where V is a given closed set in � . Such spaces were investigated by Samko [25], [29], who gave their characterization in the case when V is a cone in Rn and proved the denseness of �V in Lp(Rn ) if m(V) = 0. This denseness was obtained for an arbitrary such set V if p � 2, and for a certain class of such sets V, which were called quasibroken in [29), if 1 < p < 2. Later on it was shown that V with m(V) = 0 may be arbitrary in the case 1 < p < 2 also (Samko [36); see also the case of mixed nonn spaces
E
E
588
CHAPTER
5.
INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
The denseness of �V in Lp(Rn ), 1 < p < oo, for V an origin or a union of the coordinate hyperplanes was earlier established by Lizorkin [5], [8]. The space � � corresponding to the case V = {0}, is dense in Lp(R1 ; lxP') provided that 1 < p < oo and 'Y > - 1 or p = 1 and 'Y > - 1, but is not an integer, we refer to Muckenhoupt, Wheeden and Wo-Sang Young [1, Theorem 6.10), where the space Soo was considered. This consists of Schwartzian functions with Fourier transfonns identically equal to zero near the origin, which is somewhat narrower than �{0} · We observe that in Samko [29], [36) the denseness of similar spaces narrower than �V was indeed shown. 25.2. du Plessis (2) observed that the Sobolev theorem is reduced to the case n = 1
L;;(Rn ) in [36]).
immediately, since
n n lxln � II lx; I , or more precisely, lxln � n n/ 2 II lx; I · j =l j =l
This follows from the
fact that the geometric mean is dominated by the arithmetic one. So
,r.p(y),dy < n I lxr.p(y)dy - Y in -a - I II lx · y · l l -a/n
R•
R"
j =l
J
_
J
an d then the one-dimensional Hardy-Littlewood theorem 5.3, being applied to each variable, gives the desired estimate for Ilia 'PIIq , = - i" . We note that the Sobolev inequality Ilia fllq � cll fllp was shown by Lieb [1] to admit a maximizing function f such that equality holds. A similar function does not exist for the Bessel potential - see Lieb [1, p. 352]. The sharp constant c was explicitly evaluated by Lieb (1] in the case q = p 1 or p = 2 or q = 2. 25.3. In the limiting case p = n f a the operator Ia is not defined as an absolutely convergent integral on the whole space Lp(Rn ), but IIIar.pi iBMO � cllr.pllp on the set which is dense in Lp , where BMO is the space of functions with bounded mean oscillation. We refer to § 4.2 (note 3.3) and § 17.2 (note 13.1) in the one-dimensional case, where the references to the multidimensional case are also given. Harboure, Macias and Segovia (2] obtained weighted estimates for the Riesz potential in the case p = n f a . The paper by Mizuta (2] is also relevant. It concerns the so called total differentiability of Riesz potentials of functions in Lp, p = n / a with an integer a . We mention the paper by Stricb.artz [2) as well, who studied the Riesz ( and Bessel) potentials of functions in BMO. Chanillo (2) considered commutators b(x)(Ia f)(x) - Ia(bf)(x), f E Lp, with b E BMO. In this connection see also Komori (1] for the estimate
t ;
1
1 1 q r
Ol
- = - - - - n p
In the case and only if
[2).
n = 1 the commutator bDa - nab was shown by Murray (1] to be bounded in L2 if nab E BMO . The discussion of such iterated commutators may be found in Murray
25.4. The analogue of the Sobolev Theorem 25.2 for the mixed norm space L;;(Rn ) as in the definition in §§ 24.4 and 24.12, was given by Benedek and Panzone [1]. Ia i1 bounded from L;;(Rn ) into Lq-(R'l ), p = (pl , . . , Pn ), q = (qb . . . , qn ), if 1 < Pi < n /a a.nd 1 /qi = 1 /Pi - afn . A more general assertion in this direction was obtained by Lizorkin [7), who considered the wide class of conv@lution operators, including in parti�ular the a.ni1otropic Rieu potential• .
I [p(x - y)]a-n r.p(y)dy
(29.6)
R•
where p(x) is a non-negative a-homogeneous function of degree 1 (i.e. p(t4l Xl J , t4"xn ) = tp(x) for t > 0 with a; > 0, L a; = n ) , non-vanishing as lxl = 1. Lizorkin proved the boundedness of • • •
589 1 < Pi � qi < a = i=2:n l ai (1/Pi - 1/qi ), [1 , 32] 112 p(x) = (Jt=l lxj 12a; )
§ 29. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER the potential (29.6) from
':#
Pn qn ;
Lp(R")
into
Lq(R")
with
The book by Besov, D'in and Nikol'skii
5
oo,
is relevant here. A similar statement
p.
in a more general
for the anisotropic Riesz potential with the kernel
situation of the weighted mixed norm spaces and on subspaces of different dimensions was proved by Kokilashvili In this connection we observe that the Sobolev type different dimensions theorems for Riesz potentials were first obtained by D'in Besov, D'in and Nikol'skii p. give such a theorem in the general anisotropic case. We mention also Adams and Bagby where some cases of estimates for the usual (isotropic) Riesz potential operators from Lp into Lf are specified. 25.5. The continuity of potential type integrals
(1].
(2].
[1],
[1, 34]
Ig�P = 1 lx -tla-n �P(t)dt, E Lp(O), E R" p > n/a [2, 48). (3, 256]), if < a - nfp < 1, if a - nfp = 1, (29.7) if a - n/p > 1, 1/p + 1/p' 1. ,i-n HJ\ case 1 1.6). a A(x, 11) x -111 x, l [2,E Lt196]. = (29.7).p = fP (R") n .Lp(R"), 1 < p < n/p < a < 1 + nfp n/p (R") = {g : g(x + h) - g(x) o(lh.la -n/p ) a l �P E h. � x lh.l - (1] [1]). (9]. (29. 7 ) Ig�P case a - n/p > 1 Ig�P E Ha-n/P(O) if a - nfp '/: 1, 2, Ig�P E Ha-n/p ,l/p' if a - n/pl(i�P= 1, 2, [12]). 25.6. In a l lx l ) 1 �P( 1 f d I I y 1 1 (I: �P)(x) � �,n ("'...) lx - JIYin-a = "Y_n (a)_ Pa- u ( ) fP(p)dp O < a � , IYI< a U(..\) = i(n"'j;) -Fl (T, 1 - y; ;.; ..\2 ) (17]). 25.3 has R" Ba
n
in the case of a bounded region 0 Moreover (Sobolev p.
and
was first noted by Sobolev
p.
0
The definition of the space (0) in the one-dimensional is in § (Definition The case of the kernel with the first factor Holderian in but under the particular value oo, was treated by Mihlin p. There is a similar result for 0 R" , close to The Riesz potential la�P with oo, and =
is a Holderian function: = uniformly in as 0} (du Plessis This result was extended to certain convolution operators by Cotlar and Panzone and to more general operators by Kilbas The estimate for the integrals in the is specified as follows: . • . •
. . . and (0) is a corollary of the generalized Holderness of the potentials more general than the c ase of radial functions the expression
'
p
o
This
(Kilbas
oo
holds, where (Rubin Theorem the essential specification for radial functions. Let be the ball in centered at the origin and with radius a, 0 oo . The following theorem holds (Karapetyants and Rubin and Rubin in the general case ) .
Let1/p�P(, Iqzl=) Ep(1Lp(-Ba;mp)lxl" ),The1 n< IpI <�PI < n(p -�1)cl, lfPnI � 1, < a' <withn, m < m a, . : L.(B.; I�I.,o ) L.(B. ;I�I.,) = q(mn- a + vfp) if > ap - n a nd = q(mn + np) if � ap - n, > O, e�cep t the ca•e � ap - n if a =
Theorem 29.1. 0 � �
v
vo
v
0
oo , v
oo.
vo
e-
v
e
590
CHAPTER
5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
The JWOO/ of this theorem is based on the representation which is of interest itself of the Riesz potential with a radial density in terms of one-dimensional fractional integration in the radial variable: namely
1�.{.2 and t:!�
are the Riemann-Liouville fractional integration operators given by (2.17) Rubin (17, 22) is relevant where the inversion of potentials with a radial density and a ch81"acterization of the range were given. 25.7. In the papers by Kokilashvili and Gabidzashvili [1) and Gabidzashvili [4] and also
where
(2.18).
�� b:�:::::�: :=::.:):i=:ti(.b�;.,:)�;.-:: 4
j = 1, . . . , n ) . Applications to imbedding theorems for general weighted Liouville spaces were also given. The limiting case (p') - 1 {2: cri ) = n - a may be found in Gabidzashvili [5). Gabidzashvili [1)-[3] extended Theorem 25.4 to certain potential type operators T01 generalizing (29.6) in the apace of homogeneous type, and proved the theorem on two-weighted estimate for T01• He also gave Koosis-type theorems which allow one to have the weight by a given weight and vice versa. A more general situation into so that T01 is bounded from of homogeneous measure apace can be found in Kokilashvili and Kufner [1] and [2], where the conditions on the measure were in p81"ticul81" found for the boundedness within �the frames of Lebesgue, Lorentz and Orlicz spaces. 25.8. The weighted Theorems 25.3 and 25.4 were extended to more general cases involving P2 ), including the weak type estimates. the two-weighted estimates from P l ) into These questions have recently been developed extensively and essentially (f81" promoted). The two-weight problem of weak type inequalities for the Riesz potential was first solved in Sawyer [1], and more effectively by Gabidzashvili [1]-[3]. As for norm inequalities, the two-weight problem was completely solved by Sawyer [2], and in other terms by Gabidzashvili and Kokilashvili [10)-[11]. For various other investigations and generalizations we refer to the survey by Dyn'kin and Osilenker [1], the book by Kokilashvili [2] and his papers [3]-[9] and the papers by Gatto, Gutierres and Wheeden [1], H81"boure, Macias and Segovia [1], [2], Stromberg and Wheeden [1], [2], Heinig [1], [2], Andersen [2], Chanillo and Wheeden [1], Ruiz and Torrea [1], Gabidzashvili [4)-[6], Kokilashvili and Gabidzashvili [2], Gabidzashvili and Kokilashvili [1], Gabidzashvili, Genebashvili and Kokilashvili [1] and Fofana [1]. The reader can also find other references in these papers. The Muckenhoupt-Wheeden weight condition (25.41) is not always easily checked, so Abdullaev [1) gave the weighted boundedness conditions in the case when the set of singularities of the weight functions Pl and P2 satisfied certain assumptions and P l and P2 were functions of the distance from this set. 25.9. Mapping properties of the operator within the frames of the Hardy spaces (nn ) , in the case 1 < p < oo up t o the equivalence of 0 < p < + oo , which coincide with norma, were investigated by Stein and Weiss [2]. Their results were developed by Krantz [1], for operators more general than The case of certain generalized H81"dy spaces can be found in Taibleson and Weiaa [1] and Youngsheng Hang [1]. Two-weighted estimates of the Riesz potentials in the weighted Hardy space were given by Stromberg and Wheeden [1], [2] and Gatto, Gutierres and Wheeden [2]. 25.10. Sobolev's theorem 25.2 was extended to the generalized Riesz potentials
J =l
-n
p,
X
Lp(X;p) Lq (X;r)
Lq (Rn ;
Lp(R'I;
101•
Lp(Rn )
101
HP(R'I; p)
Ot = loll'
r
O(y) VJ(:.r: - y) dy I IYina
R•
HP
§ 29. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 5
E
O(y) = O(y/IYI) Ln/ (n -cr ) (Sn - d by Muckenhoupt [1]. (see § 4.2, note 3.2) was extended to the n-dimensional case:
with
In
591
this paper the limiting cases
p = n /01 and p = 1 were also considered. In particular, the one-dimensional Zygmund-Flett result
R".
where B is a ball in Another proof for 0 :: 1 in the cases p = n/01 and p = 1 was given by Hedberg [1], who also proved the multiplicative inequality
where 0 < 01 < n, 0 < 8 < 1, 1 < p < oo, p < q � oo, 1 /r = (1 - 8)/p + 8 / q . A more general case of O(y) Lr(Sn - d with r � n/(n - Ot) was considered by Muckenhoupt and Wheeden [1], who proved the estimate ll lxi�'(I{l
E
( E LM (EM), LM (EM • • •
(
E�) (R") (R")
p,
p,
592
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
half-space, namely
x E Rf., [01cp,= Ecp LE Lp(R"), p Lp(Rf_)
and coinciding with the Riemann-Liouville integral (5.1) if n 1, was considered by Rubin [20]. In particular, it was clarified whether the Riesz potential coincides with the unilateral potential t/J in the half-space 0, where t/J also. This is the case, if < 1/p, and then one can explicitly construct the operator A bounded in such that 0. H 1/p, in order that such an equality is satisfied, it is that 8; J(x' ,O ) - 0 1 necessal")' and suffiaent 1 /p] under the · J - 0, 1, . . . [ 8xJ,. appropriate interpretation of the trace.
18+ a(la cp)(x) = (10 Acp)(x), + Xn >
Xn >
a>
, x - (x1, ... , xn ) , •
,a-
SimilM modifications
R"
of unilateral Riesz potentials, connected with a sphere in were introduced in Rubin [19], [22], where the following results were obtained: i) the semigroup property; ii) inversion formulae given below in the case 0 < < 1 for simplicity, namely
a acn-1 (B+a ) - 1 I = r(n/2) l(x) r(n/2 - a) lx l 2 01 r(1 - a) ( B� ) -1 I = aen - 1 f r( 1 - a) +
f ( lxl2 l-(x)IYI2-)01l(ylx)- Y l" y, d
IY I < Ix l
IY I > Ixl
iii) the representation of the Riesz potential /01
d.
as
a composition
(25.76), and also Rubin [28).
The radial limits of the Riesz potential were studied by Mizuta [1], who showed that with � and + {3 < n, then there exists a Borel set C such that lim (l01cp)( r u) 0, with the Riesz capacity 0, for each u r-oo This question in a more general setting is discussed in Kurokawa and Mizuta [1].
if
cp E25.16. Lp(R"; lxl-11) c p(E) {3 0, p > 1 ap = 0 a
=
a>
E ESn-1Sn\E.-1
25.17. Kurokawa [1] proved that the Riesz (and Bessel) potentials approximate the identity operator as - +O both almost everywhere and in the Lp-norm. Namely, i) let 1 � p < oo converges to at each Lebesgue point of I; ii) let 1 < q < p and and then then n converges to I in the -norm.
a E Lp(R"), I I E Lp Lq , 1a I 101I
I Lp
25.18. The periodic analogue of the Riesz potential, i.e. the operator generated by the
§ 29. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 5
593
multiple Fourier expansion of the form rx c.p -
L l.pJ: I k l -a eib
Jk J;tO
k (kb ... , kn ),
,n,
where = 0t > 0, 0 � Xi < 2'11' , i = 1, . . . was considered by Cheng Min-teh and Chen Yung-ho (1] (1956), [2] (1957) and Wainger (1] (1965). The one-dimensional case may be seen in § 19.3. Certain developments can be also found in Cheng Min-teh and Deng Dong-gao [1]
(1979).
25.19. The Riesz-type generalization
.7°'1' �=
=
hn (at}] -1 I c.p(x Y)l�la-n dy,
(ln Yl t ··· • ln Yn ),
R"+
Rf. =
o
{y
E
R" :
Yl > 0, . . . , yn
>
0}
of Hadamard's constructions (18.42)-(18.44) was considered by Emgusheva and Nogin (1] together with the corresponding Riesz-type fractional derivatives in Rf. which are invariant relative to dilatations. 25.20. Let be locally Lebesgue integrable in R" and let be the Riesz = [0 potential, 0 < Ot < n. The inequality
f(x)
1 h"
g(x) J I lg(x) -g(xo)ldx � ch I IX - XQ In-IJa(x)l(hdx IX - xo I) +
Rn
1� -�ol< h
holds, which is obtained by direct estimations, c depending only on Ot and n (Samko). This easily yields the convergence of the left-hand side to zero as h - +O nnder the sole assumption that is finite. This proves Love's conjecture (see § 17.2, note 12.6). Love himself developed proofs for the case = 2, but they were lengthy and he noted the fact that this conjecture can also be proved by means of Theorem 1.11 from Landkof [1]. 26.1. In connection with Theorem 26.3 we observe that the truncated Riesz derivative D� J of the function J 1
(Ia iJI) (xo)
n E I0(Lp ),
n/at,
which yields the almost everywhere convergence. Here
�, (x)
and Ci (i = bypersingular
=
t- n
Lp (R"),
1•
I lc.p(x- y) - c.p(x)ldy, Wt (x)
l!l l
is the same as in (26.39), 1
=
E l • -a
I to-l· - 1 �t (x)dt, £
1, 2,3,4) are absolute constant. The almost everywhere convergence
integrals D{l/ with a characteristic investigated by Nogin [8], [11].
O(y) not necessarily homogeneous wasthe of
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
594
(D )(x) lxi) -N1 , I('Di )(x)
O(y/IYI)
26.2. The hypersingular integral {} J with a homogeneous characteristic of functions sufficiently smooth and vanishing at infinity, admits the following estimates. Let � c( 1 + for i = l with J l � c(1 + l > a and N1 > a, N'}. > n. Then
f(x) E C1(Rn ),
if
, 1/(x) l
lxi) -N� , I i
O(u) E Ll (Sn_l ), and
I(D{lf)(x) l � c(1 lxl) - min(a+N. ,N� ,n+a) if O(u) is bounded Samko [26], [31, p. 89]). The continuity modulus, of fractional order in general, w-y 5) = sup I A'Y J l x , lhl < cS X = Lp(Rn ), 1 � < or X = BC(Rn ), of the hypersingular integral D{l/ is estimated as follows: UJN(Dcr / 6) <- cb(5) w-ys(Ja, S) + c f wt>,l(f,t) +a a(t)dt' +
(
26.3.
p
(!,
oo,
- I
where
0
a(t) = J O(tu)du, t S•- •
6
t
>
0
0, b(5) =
J1 t-1 -aa(6t)dt, 00
-y
>
A
0, 0 < a < � l. Here l is the
a(t)
order of the difference, defining D 0 J. In the case 0 :: const both and b(5) are constants and may be chosen any such that a (Samko and Yakubov (4]; the case of integer -y and A and X = can be found in paper [2] by the same authors). 26.4. In the case of the characteristic the equal to the spherical harmonic hypersingular integral admits the simple expression in terms of n
A C
A>
D{l/
O(y') Dy"' J = AYm ('D)Da-m J if a � Dy,J = AYm (V)Ia-m J if a �
m,
a-m f:
Ym (y')
m,
A
where is the constant depending on a, n, m and on the type of the hypersingular integral { Samko [26], [31, p. 90]). Compare these formula with the representation (26.83) in the case
a = m.
The paper by Horvath, Ortner and Wagner (1] is also in a sense relevant. In it there were the power xi being considered distributional convolutions with the kernels taken in the certain graded algebra associated with the La�l�e operator, so that the components of xi with respect to the canonical basis of the algebra are harmonic polynomials See also Ortner [2]. 26.5. There exists a characterization of the space 1 < p < n a, not in of Strichartz's constructions terms of na J as in Theorem 26.8 and 26.9, but in t
en a j � lxl-j +a-n ,
ermsIa(Lp),
(
Yj (x). /
2 d ( A: ) f)(x) dt. This characterization is given in a more general context of y l I y 0 1!11 < 1 the Lorentz spaces Lp , q - Bagby [3]. Added in proofs. The characterization of the range JO! (Hp ) in these terms, Hp being Hardy spaces, 0 < < 1, was given by Strichartz [3]. we discard the condition J E Lq(Rn ) in the characterization of the space Ia (Lp), (see Theorems 26.8 and 26.9), we in a situation when J(x) "contains" a polynomial, because the function J (x) determined by the given seminorm I D a /l ip only. The thorough investigation of the question how does the function J(x) "turns into" a polynomial at infinity with dependence of the defining seminorm, was undertaken by Lizorkin [10], [11]. In this connection we observe j t-2a -l J 26.6. H p
is
are
§ 29.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 5
595
/Pa-n/Ipa Lp
that the space ( ) with 1 < p < oo, p � n/a may be treated as a subspace of the quotient space S' where S' is the Schwartz space of temperate distributions and is the subspace in S' consisting of polynomials of a degree not exceeding ex - nfp. For p 2 we refer to Pryde [1] and to Davtyan [1], [2] in the case 1 < p < oo. Davtyan considered a more general case of the non-isotropic Riesz potentials. This assertion for isotropic potentials was known earlier, but the authors cannot find the corresponding reference. The paper by Kurokava [2] is also relevant. There the author dealt with the case of an integer a and investigated the representation of the function in the "Beppo Live spaces" {! e 'D' : 1)i e , a } in the form where is a polynomial = +
p= a-n/p
J Lp = P(x) If
P(x) If.
J Lr
Lp .
=
f(x) IaJl(Llp),r c i DIPIJII c Daflip , l r 2I Lp,r (R") J Lr
Iii
=
Ia (Lp ) = {! : J e 1)i J e Iii = ex}, 1 p nfex, = np/(n - exp), ex = 1, . . . , n - 1. 1a ), nfp, f(x) e Ia (Lp) E Lq , 1)i J e Lr , Iii = ex, na-(a)'Dj J e Lp. 1/q = 1/p - a/n, 1/r = 1/p - (a - [ex])/n. 26.10. Ia (Lp) f(x) E Ia (Lp) Xi , i = 1, . . . , n Lq ,
<
<
Wf. J E Lp Rn r
Lp ,
2,
q
In the same papers the characterization of the space the higher derivatives: if and only if
(Lp
0<
ex
<
was given in terms of
J
where
The following coordinate characterization of the space on the behaviour of function in each variable [3]). Let
2,
involves information (Nogin and Rubin
1 (x- te ) (I�
ex
Rt
-
be the partial Riesz potential in the variable
Xi and let
"--v-'
i-1
CHAPTER
596
Theorem 29.2. Let
5.
INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
1 < p < oo a nil 0 < a < 1/p. Then
101 (Lp ) =
n
n
n If (Lp ) anil th e norm•
i=1
11 / IIJar(L, ) anll E 11/ IIJ�(L , ) are equivalent.
i=1 An extension of this theorem to the case of anisotropic Riesz potentials of the type (29.6} was given by Emgusheva and Nogin [2]. In fact, they dealt with a more general situation, considering the anisotropic spaces •
a
= (a 1 , , an) � 0 and ch81"acterizing it in terms of Riesz derivatives both in the whole space Rn and in each variable separately, or in v81"ious unifications of variables. . • •
The space Ll,r was in fact considered earlier by Davtyan [2], [3], who used the anisotropic hypersingular D01 J , introduced by Lizorkin [6], to define this space as L:,r = {/ : I e Lr , na I e Lp }. The latter is an evident generalization of the space (26.91). Davtyan showed that Ll,r = Lr n Ia ( Lp ) , where Ia ( Lp) is the range of t�e anisotropic Riesz potential of the type (26.9). He also proved the inversion theorem D01 Ia J = J, J e Lp. 1 � p � nfa•,
1/a• = n- 1 E aj 1 .
26.1 1 . The ch81"acterization of the weighted space l01[Lp (Rn ; p)) of fractional integrals with weight p (x) satisfying the Muckenhoupt-Wheeden condition (25.43) was given by Nogin and Samko (4). Thus /(x) l01[Lp(Rn ; p)), 1 < p < n/ a, if and only if /{x) e Lq(pfiiP) with 1/q = 1/p-a/n and either there exists limo D� J in the norm of Lp (Rn ; p) or l i D� fi lL • (R• ·p) � c . cIn the case n = 1 this statement was obtained by Andersen [1]. A more general situation for the spaces L;,r (P1 1 P2 ) generalizing the spaces (26.91), P l and P2 being Muckenhoupt-type weights was studied by Nogin [9], [12]. The case of power weights was previously considered by Nogin [6]. 26.12. The following theorem on the simultaneous approximation of functions and their Riesz derivatives holds. Eve ry f-nction f(x) with the finite norm
E
•
E Ar
E Ap
(29.8}
can be app rozimatell by C0(Rn)-.function• with reapect to thia no rm, 1 < p < oo, 1 < r < oo anll a > 0. We refer to Samko [17, § 5) if 1 < p < nfa, Nogin and Samko [2] if 1/p - a/n � 1/r � 1/p
and Nogin [5, p. 28] in the remaining case. 26.13. A function J.&(x) is called a multiplier in the space X if I' I e X and 11 1'/llx � cll f llx for all J In order that a bounded function J.&(x) to be a multiplier in the space l01(Lp ) of fractional integrals, 1 < p < n/a, it is necessary and sufficient that the operators I
E X.
Nc cp =
J Nc (x, y)cp(y)dy,
R•
l
Nc (x, y) = L
v =l
(�)
J ltl-n -01 (6f �-&)(x)6,_11, 01 (x - y -
ltl> c
vt, t)dt ,
l
> a,
where 6m, Ot (x, h) is the kernel (26.32), should be b�unded in Lp ( Rn ) uniformly in e. The conditions which follow are sufficient: 1 ) I ltl -n -01 11 6� �-&ll n j 01 dt < oo, 2) for each i = 1, . . . , l - 1 R•
there exists a number ai such that 0 < Oi < min( a, I - i) and
I
R•
ltl -n - Ot+Ot i l l6�1'11n /(n - Ot i ) dt <
§ 29.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 5
597
c>.. (.Rn ),{
A > at, are multipliers in la(Lp) (Samko [24]}. l'(x) E 1, X E 0 The discontinuous function xo(x) = , where 0 is the half-space or a ball, is a 0, X fl 0 multiplier in Ia ( Lp) if 1 < p < 1/ at, 0 < at < 1. The case of the region 0 satisfying the �called Strichartz condition may be fom1d in Strichartz [1] for Bessel potentials, and in Nogin and Rubin [3] for ruesz potentials. 26.14. The operator of multiplication by functions of the fonn c(x)(1 + lxl 2 ) -v/ 2 , > 0, is a compact operator from the space Ia (Lp) into the space 1a -e ( Lp) provided that 0 < e < at and II > e, c(x) E A > at - e (Umarkhadzhiev [1]). 26.15. The ruesz derivative na J as the limit (26.26) was treated by Emgusheva and Nogin [1] in a more general setting with integration in (25.60) over \ Gc instead of {t : It I > e}, where oo. In particular, fnnctions
11
c>.. (Rn ),
Rn
Ge is an arbitrary neighbourhood of the origin with the only assumption that m (K n Gc ) - 0 as e - 0 for every compact set K in We observe that Gc may thereby be unbounded. In particular, it was shown that existence of Da J does not depend on the choice of Gc .
nn .
26.16.
The generalized Marchaud-type differences
1
L: cif(x - kiy) (§ 9.2, note 5.1 1) may i =l
be used in multidimensional ruesz differentiation na J as well. This was done by Kuvshinnikova [1] together with an application to inversion of some multidimensional potential-type operators. 26.17. In connection with Theorem 26.10 and the assertion (26.971) we mention the following statement of Samko [34]. Let J(x) E Lr ( R ) , 1 < r < oo . Then lim D� J exists in
Lp(Rn),
operator
1
oo, if and only if II(E H the limit exists, then
< p <
(25.47).
Pt )a /l ip
n
�
eta, t E R�,
c-o
where
Pc is
the Poisson
II(E - p,a )JIIp � Ata iiDa fl iP and
ll�i: /l ip � clhi01IID01 /l ip, h e
nn .
26.1 8. We note that the apparatus of hypersingular integrals Dfi/ with homogeneous characteristics and the technique developed in § 26 were essentially used in a recent paper by Kochubei [1] in constructing and investigating the fundamental solution of the Cauchy problem for the periodic pseud�differential equation
t E (0, T] uc (x, t) + E
nn '
are
can
2'7.1. The following Bernstein-type inequality
II(E - A) a/ 29llp � c(1 + a2 )a/ 2 119 llp holds for Bessel differentiation (E - �)a1 2g = F-1 (1 + lel 2 )ai 2 Fg in the case of fm1ctions g E Lp(R" ) with Fourier transforms supported in the cube lej l � a, j = 1 , . . . , n. Also, the Bohr-Favard-type inequality
II(E - �) -a/ 29llp � c(1 + a 2 ) -a/ 2 119llp is valid, where G01 = (E - �) -a/ 2 is the Bessel fractional integration operator and the functions
598 g
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
E
Lp (Rn ) have Fowier transforms vanishing in the same does not depend on g(z) (Lizorkin (5]).
GaVJ = where Ga (x)
.ia
J Ga (z - Y)VJ(y)dy,
cube. The constant c in both cases
a = (a l t . . . , an ),
R•
the kernel with the Fowier transfonn
n
p(x) being the positive solution of the equation L xjp-- 24; (x) = 1, aj = a./aj · The space j= 1 Ga(Lp) of functions representable by the anisotropic Bessel potentials aaVJ, VJ e Lp(Rn ), coincides with the Sobolev space L�a) (Rn ). This consists of functions f Lp(Rn ) with Liouville fractional partial derivatives aa; J /8zj; also belonging to Lp(Rn ). Moreover, the space Ga(Lp)
E
is characterized in tenns of the corresponding anisotropic The case a 1 = · · · = an w as presented in § 27.3. 27.3 . We indicate here the integral operators potentials, but have a unilateral character similar to
hypersingular integral (Lizorkin
[8]) .
which are similar by their nature to Bessel the potentials {25.71). We denote
where dn - 1 = 2 1 -n / 2 1r-n / 2 , a > 0 - the unilateral Bessel potentials, ien ) -a. Similarly to (27.22) the equality
g"f<() = ( .j1 + lel2 - e� =F
r�) J ti�-1 (MYra VJ(·, zn =F Yn )) (z' )dtln 00
G%VJ =
0
holds and similarly to
{25.76) the representation aa
=
a%12 a�12 is valid. Here
The operators inverse to G% are realized as hypersingular integrals with weighted differences as at the end of § 27.4), thus
(G%) - 1 f =
xt:, J f�= (6�1.,J)(x)dy, I)
Ri-
I>
a,
§ 29. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 5
599
where
(_&� J)(x) J(x)e"' IYin /2Kn/2 (1YI) =
Theorem 29.3. Let a > 0 and IIIPIIP are equivalent. Let
Then I E G% (Lp), 1 � then
�Pf- = p
1
<
p
l
+
L {�) (-1) k ( kl y l )n f 2 Kn/ 2 (kl y i )J(x- ky).
k=l
< oo. Then G% (Lp ) = Lp and the norma iiG%1PIIL ; and
00
j j IYI-n y;a(.&�11 J)(x)dy, lim0 cpf- e e R"
� oo, if and only if
e-
(L,.)
l > a.
Lp(R" ). If I e G% (Lp), 1 <
p
� oo,
lim f- eziat. a/molt everywhere alao. e-0 !p Besides the operators G% , one may consider unilateral potentials of the form
Cn- 1 1fn/2 Their action in Fourier images is reduced to multiplication by (1 le'l ien ) -a In the case these potentials coincide with the operators V) -a consideredwithin =
� =
§
n =
1). 18.4.
+
1
r (n/2)
(29.9)
•
=t=
(E ±
(d. (25.75)
Operators G% defined via Fourier images are found in the book by Triebel [1 , p. 282], where the mapping property G� : L: - L;+P was proved for them. In explicit form the potentials G%1P were given in Rubin [20], [24], where in particular, the inversion of these potentials and Theorem 29.3 were proved. The potentials (29 .9} were considered in Eskin (1]. 27 .4. We note the characterization of the space (Lp) of Bessel potentials in terms of "truncated" integrals (27.46), (27.54) and (27.55).
aa .
Theorem 29.4. Let 1 < p < oo, a > o, a #: 2, 4, 6, . . . Then e Ga (Lp) if and only if vi f E Lp , U l � lal, aftd Ofte of the following COftdition.t i• aa.tiafied: i ) the aequence D �A0 ,e f of i•tegr4l• (27.46) converg e• in Lp -norm; ii) sup l iD � e f l lp < oo . e>O We observe that hypersingular integrals f have a certain advantage in comparison with used in Theorem 27.3. That is, they contain the characteristic the Riesz derivatives
oo
na exponentially vanishing at infinity. aa )
J(x)
D�o
�a (lyl)
Theorem 29.5. The apace ( Lp , Ot > 0, 1 � p < oo, conai.tt• of thoae and OftiJ tho•e j.nction• f (x) E Lp for which the aequence !D? f converge• in Lp -norm, wh ere !D: i• one of the i•tegral• (27.54) aftd (27.55), or the truncation of the integral (27.56). The former of these theorems was established by Nogin (9], the latter by Rubin (23], (25]. 27.5. The presentation of the Bessel potentials theory from the point of view of fractional powers of operators can be found in Fisher (3)-[6]. We mention also the paper by Fujiwara [2), where the domain of the fractional power (E in the half-space (under the third boundary condition) was characterized in terms of the interpolation spaces [H •P (� , LP(R�p]. The
J
-/1)a/2
2 )
600
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
[1) {(x, 31) ,R'&+1 :[1x) Rn 31
previous paper Fujiwara is also relevant. Purely imaginary fractional powers of an elliptic-type differential operator of the second order were treated by Fujiwara 27.6 . Ginzburg studied trace problems in certain weighted Bessel potential spaces in the strip 0 < < b }, defined via Bessel fractional differentiation in x and E E normal differentiation of the first order in 31· 28. 1 . FUnctions
[3).
,
p(e) Je� -e� - ... -e�,
c.p[P(e)) Ki {e : p2 (e) x i31, E Rn , 31 K+ {31 : p2 (31) 311 [1]). [1)
> o,e 1 > o} and is supported in the light cone = There the function z = > O, < 0} and K11 (z) is the McDonald function, + x = E and it is assumed that the integral in the left-hand side converges absolutely (Domingues and Trione In this connection the book by Leray is relevant, where the expression for the Fourier-Laplace transform of Lorentz-invariant functions was given in terms of a composition of the one-dimensional Fourier-Laplace transform with fractional integration, this being similar to (25.14). 28.1 1 • Kipriyanov and Ivanov introduced the hyperbolic Riesz potential of type (28.19) within the frames of a general Lorentz space X defined as a smooth manifold in equipped with the Lorentz structure and the metric This was defined by the equation • · · ch with = this also being known as = Lobachevskii space. In fact the authors dealt with the following modification
[1) 2rzy [x, 31)2 [x, x)-1 [31, 31] -1 [x, 31) X1 311 - X2 31r2zy-. Xn31n ,
Rn
(IaJ)(x) Hn ( ) J f(31)sh a-1rzyd31 Dz 101 =
1
a
D:e
of the Riesz hyperbolic potentials, being the corresponding analogue of the cone (28.18). They proved Sobolev-type theorem on the boundedness of from Lp (X) into Lq (X) with 1 < p < q < oo, 1/q = 1/p - a/n, together with the weak-type estimate in the case p = 1. 28.1 11 • Riesz introduced surface hyperbolic single- and double-layer potentials. The with the Lorentz distance, and S(x) a part of a former was given by
[7)J g(u)r01-n (u - x)dsu S( z ) S K:;(x) h(x), � g(x), x E S.
given surface which is cut off by the cone (cf. (28.21)). Ivanov and Kipriyanov [1] applied such potentials with a = 2 to the Cauchy problem for the wave equation with the initial = data u(x) = 28.2. The spaces
a > 0,
1 � p < oo ,
1�
r
< oo ,
L;,r {! : l fl r + +, r c; H01c.p c.p Lp(�+1 ): r c�.r Lr nH01(Lp ), r
(compare with the spaces = u.r- 1 1e i 01.1"J II, < oo } , see (26.91)) were introduced and investigated in Nogin and Rubin [1], [5]. They generalize the spaces and and coincide with the former if 1 < p < oo, 0 < a < 1 n/2, r = (n 2)p/(n 2 - ap) and � with the latter if a > 0, 1 < p = < oo. The spaces consist of functions E representable as the potential with E =
1�
p,
< oo, a > 0.
+ Ha (Lpf+) Lr1t(R01n(Lp) +1 )
§ 29.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 5
601
They are characterized by the relations
Cp1r
=
{! :
c,aIr = {! : J e Lr ' where T01 is the operator
J E Lr , T01 f E Lp }, 1 5 p, r < oo, sup IIT:r fl iP <
�>0
00
(28.52) and T� f is
},
a > O,
1 < p < oo, 1 5 r < oo ,
the truncated integral in
Ot >
o,
(28.52).
The spaces
CJ1p = 1t01(Lp ) admit a simil8l- characterization in tenns of the hypersinsular integral
(28.54).
H 0 < 0t < 2, the characterization of the space 1t01(Lp ) in tenns of hypersingular integrals with first onler differences was also obtained by Chanillo [1] and Nogin (5). In the case 0 < a < 1 Bagby [1] used other means - Strichartz..type constructions - for the same purpose. There is the characterization of the space 1t01(Lp ) with a � 1 in non-constructive terms - via reduction as in Gopala Rao [1, 2]. Nogin and Rubin (1), (5) obtained the "separated" characterization of the spaces Cp1r , which reveals different behaviour of functions j (x , t) € £p1 r in the space variable X and in the time variable t, thus
c;1r
where
{f : J e Lr , D � J e Lp , n:/2 f e L, , },
1 < p < oo, 1 5 r < oo, a > 0 and D� J =
=
1 �- +O dn l ( a ) I lim
(L. (R•+ 1 ))
-
l
1: ( �)f(x - kf1,t)lfll-n - a dfl J ""(-1) LJ
lrl > � 1: =0
�
is the "partial" Riesz derivative in X and n:/2 j is the partial Riesz derivative in t. Instead of the space derivative D� f the set of partial coordinate derivatives D�i f, i = 1, 2, , n, may be used to give the similar "coordinate" characterization of the spaces Cp1 r . These characterizations were applied by Nop and Rubin (1 ), (5) to investigate multipliers in Cp1r and establish a connection of c;lr with Sobolev spaces in the case of integer a. Some sufficient tests for multipliers in tenns of the spaces cA(Rn) were, in particular, given in these papers. The wide class of regions in nn +l , containing the class of so caRed Strichartz regions was also defined, the characteristic functions of which are multipliers in Cp,r · Multipliers in 1t01 (Lp ) were studied by Bagby [1]. Chanillo [1] showed that functions in c0 (nn+1 ) are multipliers in 1t01 (Lp ). Nogin and Rubin (1], [5) showed that the space C�'J, m = 1, 2, , consists of functions f(x, t) E Lp , which have the partial derivatives a2m f /8xJm , j = 1, , n, and am f /8tm in • • •
. • •
.Lp(,R'I+ l ). In the case of odd a = 2m - 1,
• • .
m = 1, 2, . . . , a similar assertion was obtained, the only difference being that smoothness order m - 1/2 with respect to t is fractional. Thus the :-----
- 2 partial Riesz denvative n,m 1/ was used. In the case r = p statements similar to above were proved by Gopala Rao [1], but his results contain superfluous information on mixed derivatives in the sufficiency part. Nogin and Rubin managed to avoid this excess information. Bagby [1] gave interpolation theorems for the spaces 1t01 (Lp )· We also obeerve that the spaces 1t01(Lp ) coincide up to the equivalence of the norms with the anisotropic spaces of functions in Lp which have the generalized Liouville derivatives of order a in x;, j = 1, , n, and of order a/2 in t, all belonging to Lp . This is proved by means of the Lp -multipliera technique. Such spaces are particular cases of the general anisotropic spaces investigated by Lizorkin (5), (6], [8] . 28.3. As it was shown by Nop and Rubin [2], the hypersingular integrals TO f and '!'01 f (28.52) and (28.54) - which invert the potentiaJa J = H01cp and J = 1t01cp, cp Lp , respectively, may be interpreted as the almoet everywhere limits of the corresponding "truncated" integrals. .
•
•
•
.
.
• • •
E
·
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
602
28.-4. Fractional powers of the hyperbolic operator Err - i 4' were investigated by Sprinkhuisen-Kuyper (1), (2). 28.5. One more variant of fractional integration is defined by the relation
3irr
in Fourier images. This was investigated by Takano (2], who showed that the operators Ta J form a semigroup of the class (Co) in the space Lp(R" ; p) , with a Muckenhoupt-type weight p (x) for every a > 0. The generator of this semigroup is the hypersingulM operator ncr. This was interpreted by Takano as the closure of the operator F- 1 1x i 01F in the space Lp(R" ; p). The case p(x) = (1 + tzl 2 )-m /n , m > n, was considered eMlier in Takano [1]. This semigroup in the one-dimensional case Mo&e earlier in some probability problems (see Kat [1] and Elliott [1] in the case 0 < a < 1 and S . Watanabe [1] in the case 0 < a < 2). 28.6. In connection with the various forms of fractional integro-differentiation of functions of many variables, we mention the case of functions given on the unit sphere in R". There are many papers devoted to fractional powers of the Beltrami-Laplace operator on the sphere and their generalizations and analogues. We refer the reader to the review paper by Samko [30], where other references can be found. We also cite Samko [22) and Pavlov and Samko [1], where the direct analogues of Riesz integro-differentiation on the sphere were considered, including spherical hypersingular integrals. See also Colzani (1] and Vakulov and Samko [1]. 28. 'T. There is a generalization of fractional integro-differentiation to the case of many variables whim involves integration over a cone with the vertex at the point x E R". instead of the half-axis ( -oo,x) in the one-dimensional case. This is discussed in the book by Vladimirov, Drozhzhinov and Zav'yalov [1]. The definition is as follows. Below r is a closed convex acute solid cone in R"; r• = {( E R" : ( ·x � 0 Vz E r} is a cone conjugate to r ; C = int r• is the set of inner points of r• ; is the convolution algebra of temperate generalized functions with support in r ; H( C) is the algebra of functions holomorphic in the tube region TC = {z = x+i11 : z R", 11 E C} which are Laplace transforms L(g] = (g((), e*z·e ) of generalized functions g E The function K:c(z) = J eiz·(cJ.e is called the Cauchy kernel of the tube region TC . The open convex acute
Sf.
Sf.. E
cone C is called regular if [K:c(z)] - 1 E H(C). I'
The operation of fractional integro-differentiation is introduced as follows. Let C = int r• Let Dr(() = L -l [K:0(z)](() be a regular cone. Then K:0(z) = [K:c(z)]a E H(C) for any 01 E be the Laplace original of the power K:0(z) defined as the chMacteristic function of the cone r, if a = 0. The operator of fractional integro-differentiation is defined as the convolution with the distribution Or((). These operators form an abelian group with respect to 01 . It can be shown that the tensor product of the one-dimensional Liouville fractional integrals of the same order, and Riesz potentials with the Lorentz metric are particular cases of the above operators. 28.8. Another approach to fractional integro-differentiation connected with cones in R" was eMlier developed by Gindikin (1], [2] (see Vainberg and Gindikin (1]). In contrast to note 28.7 the order of fractional integration is "multidimensional" here. Let V be a convex cone in R" , not containing straight lines, such that there exists a group G(V) of linear transforms preserving V, with the following property. For all points z and 11 E V there exists a unique transformation 1/J E G(V) for which 1/J(z) = 11 · H we fix a point e E V, then we can transfer the multiplicative structure of the group G(V) to V: zy = g(x)y, where g(z)e = z, g(z) E G(V). A function satisfying the condition J(xy) = /(z) f (y) is called a complex power function. Every
Rl .
also
I = 1, has the form /(z) = n (xk (z))PJr tl::.fxP, k= l fractionally p = (P l t . . . , PI ) E C1 • The number I is called the rank of the cone V, Xk (x) rational functions of coordinates of the point The cone V is defined by the inequalities Xk (x) > 0, k = 1, . . . , l. Let d�-i be the measure invariant with respect to the group G(V). It is connected with euclidian one by the relation d"' = zddx, where d = (d t . . . . , d1 ) E R1 • Further, let
such function /, nonnalized by the condition /(e)
are
x.
§ 29.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 5
603
rv (p) be the Siegel integral of the second kind, or r-function of the cone V. It may be represented as a product of usual f-functions. The Riemann-Liouville operator of order p = (Pl , . . . , P l ) E C 1 is defined as
('Pv cp} (x) =
1 f v (p)
f cp(y}(y - x)P+ddy 00
where integration is carried out over the cone (x, oo ) consisting of points y such that y - x E V. In Gindikin [1] a detailed investigation of the operators Pv was undertaken, and applications to constructing fund.amental solutions of certain differential equations and solving some problems of integral geometry were given. The Abel equation Pv cp = f was considered. Analysis similar in a sense to the latter was developed earlier by Gi.rding [1] for the case of cones of symmetric and Hermitian matrices. Faraut [1] also considered the case where the Riesz-type potential was introduced for a symmetric cone in a Jordan algebra and its applications to the Cauchy problem were given. The Rie -Liouville operators connected with homogeneous cones were also dealt with in the paper by Watanabe [1]. We observe that the Riemann-Liouville operators 'Pv were used by V.S. Rabinovich [1] in investigating multidimensional integral equations of convolution type, the symbol of which has a singularity at infinity of the type of complex power function related to some cone. In this paper the analogues of the Sobolev-Slobodetskii function spaces were constructed in terms of the operators 'Pv . This was applied to the problem of Noether properties for convolution type equations. 28.9. Let Ac(b) be the pyramid (28.60), and x E R!' , k = (kl , . . . ,kn) be a vector-function. Let us denote k(x) = kl (x) . . . kn(xn) and consider the Abel-type equation :c
mann
J k(A (x - t))cp(t)dt ·
=
f(x), x E Ac(b).
(29.10)
A c(:c )
which is more general than (28.65). Let the vector-function l (x) exist for the given kernel k(x) such that
J (1(:c ,r)
l(A · (x - t))k(A · (t - r) )dt = 1
(29.11)
where u(x, r) is the region (28.64). Then (29.10) is solved by the same method that was applied to (28.65), and the unique solution of (29.10} is
op(z) =
ii ( t •i,;' a:J J l(A · a=l
J =l
(z - t))J(t)dt
Ac(:c )
(Kilbas). Equation (29.10} is a pyralil.idal an�ogue of the Sonine equation (4.1), while (29.11 ) is such an analogue of the condition (4.2 11 ) . 28.10. Beautroux and Burbea [1) considered the "fractional radial differentiation" operator for holomorphic functions f(z) = L: a k z k in the unit ball in en defined as na J = L:
604
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIATION OF MANY VARIABLES
Lipshib,.type estimates for functions in
A� , a ·
Similar results in the context of more general
Hardy-Bergman-type spaces H�·9 ,/3 can be found in Jevtic [2). 28.1 1. Ricci and Stein [1] defined fractional integration in the context of nilpotent groups by considering convolutions with kernels supported on an analytic homogeneous manifold V in the group. Typical examples of these convolutions are fractional integration along a homogeneous curve 11 = R�, k > 0, or the case when V is the n-dimensional forward light cone in nn+ 1 • They investigated the problem of Lp - Lq boundedness of such convolutions.
zk , z E
Chapter 6 . Applicat ions to Integral Equat ions of t he First Kind wit h Power and Power- Logarithmic Kernels In this chapter we present applications of fractional integrals and derivatives to integral equations of the first kind
Mtp ::
f k(z, t)tp(t)dt = l(z),
0
z E 0,
the kernels k(z, t) of which have a singularity of the type lz - t la- l , 0 < a < 1 , or, more generally lz - t l a - 1 lnm lz!,1 . Fractional integrals arise naturally in the former case, the latter leading to their generalization considered in § 21. The kernels k(z, t) are ass umed to be real-valued for simplicity, while the right-hand side and the unknown function may be assumed to be complex-valued. In the case k(z, t) = c(z, t)lz - t la-l the investigation and solution of the above equation is based on the idea to single out the fractional integration operator explicitly. Namely, the equation Mtp = I generally speaking can be represented in the form Ia N tp = I, N = v a M, where [a and 'D0 are suitable forms of fractional integra-differentiation. The equation N cp = g, g = 'D0 I, obtained after inverting the Abel equation proves to be an equation of the second kind under rather weak assumptions on c(z, t). In the case when c(z, t) is continuous at t = z this is a Fredholm equation of the second kind. If the function c(z, t) is allowed to have a jump at t = z , this case being of special interest and often occurring in applications, then the situation proves to be more difficult. The equation of the second kind which results is of a singular type. The theory of such equations is well known and we ass ume the reader to be familiar with the simplest ideas and facts of this theory. An excellent presentation may be found in the well known books of Gahov (1] and Muskhelishvili (1]. Nevertheless , we display the main results of this theory as required in the present chapter in the preliminary subsection § 30.1. In certain
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
606
simple cases for example in § 30.1 , we shall manage with minimal knowledge of the singular integrals considered in § 11. Some types of singular equations ( the "dominant" ones, in particular) are solvable in closed form, i.e. via quadratures. This will allow us to obtain an explicit solution - in closed form - of a certain class of the equations of the first kind considered. As regards the most general case, we shall obtain results which have a qualitative nature, and characterize the solvability of the equation. Among these the reader will find the criterion of normal solvability and the formula for the index (see definitions for these notions in § 31.1). We call attention to subtlety connected with the representation of the operator M in the form M = 1a N, which will always be our particular concern in the investigation of the equations. This representation obviously assumes the identity M = Java M to hold, but in general la va I #; I see for example (2.60). We can be sure of the validity of the relation Ja v a I = I by taking functions I representable by the fractional integral of order a as in (2.59). So we must check the fact that the range of the operator M is embedded into the range of the fractional integration operator 1a . We shall always keep this checking in mind. As for the equations of the first kind with a kernel involving a power logarithmic singularity, the scheme of investigation is the same. Fractional integration is replaced by the operators 1a ,m considered in § 21, and fractional differentiation by the operators inverse to 1a , m realized as a convolution with the Volterra function. -
§
30.
The Generalized Abel Integral Equation
We begin with a consideration of the equation which has become known as the generalized Abel equation. The case of the equation on the whole axis will be easier in a sense. In the first subsection we give necessary preliminaries concerning the solution of singular integral equations for the reader's convenience.
30. 1 . The dominant singular integral equation The equation at (z)
a2(z) 1r
f
-oo
=
l(x ).
(30.1)
is known as the dominant singular integral equation on the whole axis. We assume the coefficients a 1 ( z ) and a2 (z} to be real-valued for simplicity, while the right-hand side and the unknown function may be assumed to be complex valued. Let
(30.2)
§ 30.
THE GENERALIZED ABEL INTEGRAL EQUATION
607
We denote
O(x) = arg G(x) .
(30.3)
The integer
x=
00
2
� j d arg G(x) -
(30.4)
oo
is called the index of (30.1). Equation (30.1) is solvable in closed form and its solvability is characterized by the following theorem.
Let assumptions (30.2) be satisfied. If x � 0, then (30.1) is unconditionally solvable in Lp(R1 ), whatever the right-hand side f(x ) E Lp(R1 ), 1 < p < oo , is and its general solution is given by
Theorem 30.1.
c�: a2 (x+)Z( x) + at(z) f( x)
•
A:=l
(x
A(x)
i) A:
_
a2 (x)Z(x) f00 f(t )dt A(x) 1r Z(t)(t - x) - oo
(30.5)
where CA: are arbitrary constants, which may be complex the sum being omitted if x = 0, A(x) = a�(x) + a�(x ) and
•/ Z(x) = ( : � ;. ) - 2 y'A{x)e -r(z) , 1(x) _
If x
<
1 ! 2 .
00 ln
11"1
- oo
[ ( !:;: ) • G(t)] dt. t-X
0, (30.1) is solvable if and only if
f00 f(x)dx
- oo
Z(x)(x + i)A: = O,
k = 1, . . . , l xl .
(30.6)
We remark also that
Z(x), Z(1x) E H (R. 1 ) , .\
(30.7)
608
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE Fffi.ST KIND
The singular equation of the form 00
a t (z) ,P(z) + !.7r j a 2t(t)-,Pz(t) dt = g(z) -oo is also solvable by quadratures, unconditionally solvable for x � general solution H
c�: Z(z) + a t (z) g (z) Z(z) 1/J(z) = � L::' 1r (z + i)A: A(z) 1:- 1 _
(30.8) 0 and has
the
00
a 2 (t)g(t)dt f Z(t)A(t)(t - z)
- oo
(30.9)
where A(z) and Z(z) are the same as in (30.5). The necessary and sufficient condition for solvability of (30.8) in the case x < 0 is
f Za(z2 (z)g(z) )(z + i)A: d 00
...
...
-oo
=
O,
k = 1, . . . , lxJ.
The characteristic singular equation on an inten;al cp(t)dt = !( z ) , a < z < b, a 1 (z) cp( z) + a27r(z) f --t-z 0 b
--
(30.10)
has a more complicated solvability picture. Let as before
a t (z), a 2 (z) E H.\ ([a, b]); a�(z) + a � (z) "I 0, z E [a, b].
(30.11)
Solutions of (30.10) may be looked for in the space H* = H*(a, b) of Holderian functions with integrable singularities at the end-points of the interval ( cf. Definition 13.1). This is caused by the fact that the solutions of (30.10) have in general singularities at the end-points. Sometimes it is desirable to find solutions bounded at one end or at both. We denote
H = H((a, b]) = U H"([a, b]) = H* n C([a, b]),
(30.12)
n; = H* n C([a, b)), n; = H* n C((a, b]).
(30.13)
1' >0
§ 30.
609
THE GENERALIZED ABEL INTEGRAL EQUATION
We shall use one of the spaces H* , n: , n; or H as a space in which solutions are to be found. In contrast to the case of the whole axis the index of (30.10) is known to depend on the space of solutions. Let G(x) = e i8 (� ) be the function (30.3). Let us choose the value of arg G( x) so that
(30.14)
0 � O(a) < 21r. Let
Ra
{ O,1,
=
if we look for solutions bounded as x --+ a, if we admit for solutions unbounded as x --+ a
and n6 is defined similarly. By X we denote any of the spaces H* , We set K
= Kx =
[O��]
n: , n; or H .
+ R 0 + R& - 1 for the space H* , for the space n: or for the space H
(30.15 )
n; '
and
JJa =
1 - Ra - O(a) 21r ,
where [O{b)/(21r)] denotes the entire part of the number. We emphasize that JJa = JJa( X ) and JJ6 = JJ,(X.) and -1 < JJa < 1, -1 < JJ6 < 1. Theorem 30.2.
Let conditions (30.11) and (30.14) be satisfied and f(x) = (x - a) l -"/.(x) • (b - x) l - v, ' /.(x) E H.
Then (30.10) is unconditionally solvable in the space X if lla 0 and its general solution is
x�
( )
U'J • r ...
> JJa ,
v,
> JJ6
and
a 2 (z)Zo(z) (z a ) "'• (b z) "'" P• (z ) + a 1 (z)/(z) -1 A(z) A(z) _
_
_
a2 (z)Zo(z) 1rA(z)
( z - a ) "' • ( b - z ) "' " f(t)dt J t - a b - t Zo(t)(t - z) ' ,
a
( 30.16 )
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
610
where A(z ) is the same as in (30.5), P.Jt-t (x ) is a polynomial of degree x - 1 with arbitrary coefficients ( P.Jt - t (z) = 0 if x 0} and =
Zo ( z)
=
� [i �(�� + /J(a) ln(z - a) - /J(b) ln( b - z)] E H.
exp 2
(30.16')
If x < 0, (30.10) is solvable if and only if
J b
Zo
/�z)(z - a)�- l dz x ( x - a) �'•
b - z ) �'•
=
k=
0,
1, . . . ' lxl.
This condition being satisfied, (30.10) has the unique solution given by (30.16) with P.Jt- t :: 0. 30.2. The generalized Abel equation on the whole axis In this subsection, using Liouville fractional integra-differentiation following equations of the first kind
M
Q
J z
-oo
_Ma ,p =-
J z
00
_
z
(30.17)
00
u(t) ,P(t)dt + v(t) ,P(t)dt g ( ) - X• ( z - t) l -a J (t - x) l -a _
- oo
J� we solve
(30.18)
effectively in closed form. Equations (30.17) and (30.18) are known as the generalized Abel equations with, exterior and interior coefficients, respectively. These equations can also be written as
1;2�"'11�� (
J
00
M a
Ct (z ) +
-oo
- a
z - t)
J c1 (t) +IXc2-(t)tsigI I-an (x - t)
00
- oo
=
u(x) +2 v(x)
'
C2 ( X ) =
4'· o/
(t )dt
=
(30.17')
- g (X) ,
(30.18')
_
u(x) -2 v(x) .
(30.19)
§ 30.
THE GENERALIZED ABEL INTEGRAL EQUATION
Equations (30.17) and fractional integration:
611
(30.18) are evidently rewritten in terms of the operators of
Ma tp = u(z)r(a)I+ tp + v(z)f(a)l� tp = /(z),
(30.20)
(30.21) Ma .,p :: f(a)I+ (u .,P) + f(a)I� (v .,P) = g(z), where I± are the fractional integration operators (5.2) and (5.3). We shall seek solutions of (30.17) and (30.18) in the space L,(R1 ) , 1 < p < 1/a. A principal question for (30.17) and (30.18) - as well as equation of the first kind
- is the following. How can we characterize admissible right-hand side functions f(z) and g(z) of (30.17) and (30.18) for a given space of solutions, L,(R1 ), in the present case? We shall see that the ranges M a (L,) and M a (L,) coincide with the space Ia ( L, ) of fractional integrals, which was studied in detail in § 6, or perhaps differ from 1a ( Lp ) by a finite-dimensional space. As for the coefficients u(z) and v(z), we shall assume that
u(z), v(z) E H>. CR1 ) ,
.\ > a,
(30.22)
u(z), v(z) E H>.CR1 ),
.\ > 0,
(30.23)
in the case of (30.17) and
in the case (30.18). Here R} is the axis, completed by the unique infinite point and H>.Ck1 ) is the Holder space defined by (1.6). Clarifying condition (30.22), we remark that it is caused by the requirement that multiplication by u(z) and v(z) preserves the space of functions representable by fractional integrals of order a (see Theorem 6. 7). We suppose that the coefficients u ( z) and v( z) do not vanish simultaneously:
(30.24) The key point in solving (30.17) and (30.18) is the connection between the fractional integration operators I± and the singular operator which was established in § 11.
S,
A. Solution of the generalized Abel equation with exterior coefficients.
Applying
(11.10) to (30.20), we have
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
612
i.e. we represent the operator Ma as a composition:
(30.25) where a 2 (z) No� = a 1 � + a 2 S� = a 1 (z)�(z) + 1r
00
j
-
oo
�(t )dt , t-z
(30.26)
a 1 (z) = f(a)[u(z) + v(z) cos c:t7r], a2 (z) = f(c:t) sin c:t1rv(z). (30.27) It is clear now that the solutions of (30.17) will be given in closed form: we are to solve successively the singular equation
(30.28)
No� = !
of the form (30.1) using known results and then invert the Abel equation. While solving these equations in the way mentioned we have to guarantee the solvability of the Abel equation I+ cp = � . Namely, we seek solutions cp Lp and suppose that f Ia(Lp)· But inverting this Abel equation we do not know, generally speaking, that � Ia(Lp)· So we have to make sure that any solution �(z) of the dominant singular equation (30.28) is representable by the fractional integral of order c:t, when the right-hand side is. This will be shown in Lemma 30.1 below. We solve now (30.28) by using the result in (30.5). As was noted above we are to solve this equation in the space 1a ( Lp). We shall find all the solutions of this equation in the space L9, q = p/( 1 - c:tp), (taking into account that Ia(Lp) C L9 by Theorem 5.3) and then show that these solutions belong to Ia(Lp), if f Ia(Lp)· It follows from (30.24) and (30.22) that the assumptions (30.2) are satisfied. The index x of (30.28) (see (30.4)) in terms of functions defined in (30.19) has the form
E
E
E
E
� J d arg [ct(z) + ic2 (z)tg a21r ] . 00
x=
(30.29)
-oo
The number x is integer-valued: x = 0, ±1, ±2, . . . . If x � 0, the general solution of the singular equation according to (30.5), by the relation � ....
(z) _ - � c�: _
(30.28)
is given,
v(z)Z(z) u(z) + v(z) cos c:t?r + /( z ) r( Q)A(z) ( z + i)l:
v(z)Z(z) sin c:t?r A(z) 1rf(c:t)
00
f
- oo
f(t)dt Z(t)(t - z) '
(30.30)
§ 30. THE GENERALIZED ABEL INTEGRAL EQUATION
613
where Ci are arbitrary (complex) constants,
(30.31) (
and the function Z z) is equal to Z( z) =
(: � �)
· - N/ 2
e-r<�>,
�
(30.32) If x 0, the necessary and sufficient conditions of solvability for (30.26) appear according to (30.6): the right-hand side is to be orthogonal to a finite - oo
<
number of linearly independent functions.
Let at(z), a2(z) E H>.. CR1 ) , ..\ > If f(z) E 1°(£,), then all the solutions E £9, q = p/(1 -ap), of the equation a 1 C) + a2SCJ = I belong to l0(Lp) as well. Proof. Since I E L9(R1 ) , all the solutions in L9(R1) are given by (30.5). Then the second and the third terms in (30.5) belong to p:r(L,) by (30.7), Theorem 6.7 and Corollary 1 of Theorem 11.4 . Further, by (5.28) we have ( z + i)- t = li.V't , where V' t (z) = const ( z i) � a E L,(R1) for every p � 1, k = 1, 2, . . . . So ( z i)- i E 1°(£,) and then also Z(z)v( z) ( z + i)- t E 1°(£,) by Theorem 6. 7 . In view of Lemma 30.1 solutions V'(z) of the starting equation (30.17) or (30.25) may by found by the relation C)
Lemma 30.1.
ct.
+
+
- :-
V'( z ) = Da+ A;...... , n a+ A;...... -
•
Q
()()
� ( z) - ct ( z -
t) dt,
(30.33) r(1 - a) J0 where ct(z) is the function (30.30). The solution V' E L,(R1) of the Abel equation was found in accordance with Theorem 6.1. Thus, taking Lemma 30.1 and Theorem 30.1 into account, we see that the initial equation (30.25) is solvable for any right-hand side f E Ia(L,) if x � 0. This means that 1°(£,) � Ma(L,) if x � 0. On the other hand, M0(L,) � Ia(L,), which follows directly from (30.17) in view of (6.1) and Theorem 6.7. So t l +a
(30.34)
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
614
In the case x < 0 (30.34) is valid "up to a finite-dimensional subspace" , which is produced by the finite number of linearly independent solvability conditions
(30.6).
Thus we have proved the following theorem. 30.3. Let assumptions (30.22) and (30.24) be satisfied and let x be the index (30.29). Equation (30.17) is unconditionally solvable in L,(R1 ), 1 < p < 1/o:, for any right-hand side f(z ) E P�(L,), if x � 0, and its general solution is given by (30.33) and (30.30). If x < 0, then (30.17) is solvable for those and only those right-hand sides f(x) E la (L,), which satisfy the conditions
Theorem
00
J Z(x)(x + i)k = O, f(x)dx
k=
1, . . . , 1 x l,
(30.35)
-oo
If these conditions are satisfied, the equation has the unique solution given by (30.33) and (30.24) with CJ: = 0. B.
Solution of the generalized Abel equation with interior coefficients.
Applying (11.10) to into account, we obtain
(30.21)
and taking the commutation property of (11.12)
Ma cp = r(o: )l+[(u + V COS 0:7r)cp + sin o:7rS(vcp)).= g , i.e. we represent the operator if a
as
a composition
(30.36) where
J a2 (t)cp(t)dt t-X , 00
No cp = a 1 cp + S(a2 cp) = a 1 (x)cp(x) + .!_ 7r
- oo
(30.37)
and a 1 (x) and a 2 (x) are coefficients {30.27). Now we are to solve successively the Abel integral equation and then the singular integral equation
(30.38)
§ 30. THE GENERALIZED ABEL INTEGRAL EQUATION
615
of the form (30.8). Here D+a 9 - f(1 a- a) J g (z) -t t+g (za - t) dt E L 00
_
P
0
provided that E Ia (Lp) (we have used Theorem 6.1 here). It remains to solve (30.38) in the space Lp. In contrast to the previous case of exterior coefficients, when we solved the singular equation first and the Abel equation afterwards, we deal with the inverse order for solving now. Hence there arises no need to represent the solution of the singular equation by fractional integral as before. Solving (30.38) using (30.9), we have g
_ sina 7r Z(z) j v(t)(D+g)(t) dt ( 30.39) 1rf(o) Z(t)A(t)(t - z) ' provided that x � 0, with x the same as in (30.29) . Here A(z) and Z(z) are functions (30.31 ) and (30.32) . In the case x 0 there arise necessary and sufficient solvability conditions for 00
- oo
<
(30.38):
v(z) (D+ g)(z) dz = 0 ' J Z(z) (z + i)k 00
k=
1, . . . , 1xl.
- oo
Us.ing (5. 17) for fractional integration by parts, we can transform these orthogonality conditions to the form 00
j g(z)tP,, (z)dz = 0,
k=
1, . . . , lxl,
(30.40)
-oo
where Toa justify the applicability of (5.17) we have to show that v(t)(t + i)-k /Z(t) E I (Lp) · This fact was established in the proof of Lemma 30.1. As a result, we arrive at the following theorem. in
616
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE Fffi.ST KIND
Let assumptions (30.23) and (30.24) be satisfied. Equation (30.18) is unconditionally solvable in Lp(R1 ), 1 < p < 1/o:, for any right-hand side g(z) E Ja (Lp), if x � 0 and its general solution is given by (30.39). If x < 0, (30.18) is solvable for those right-hand sides g(z) E Ia (Lp) which satisfy orthogonality conditions (30.40), then in this case the unique solution is given by (30.39) with CJ: = 0.
Theorem 30.4.
30.3.
The generalized Abel equation on an interval
We consider now the equations of the above type in the case of an interval:
J
J 6
�
cp(t)dt u(z) (zcp-(t)dt p - a + v(z) (t - z) l - a = f(z), t a �
J �
u(t)cp(t)dt (z - t) l-a +
J (tv(t)cp(t)dt - z) l- a = g (z) '
a<
z < b,
(30.41)
6
a
b,
(30.42)
where 0 < a < 1. This case is of especial interest because of the various applications where such equations arise - see references in § 34.2, note 30.8. In contrast to § 30.2, the behaviour of the coefficients at the end-points of the interval will have an essential influence on the existence of solutions, their quantity and the nature of the singularities. We shall give the complete solution of (30.41) and (30.42) in closed form and clarify the influence of the end-points on the solutions of the equation. We shall seek solutions of (30.41) and (30.42) in the space H* of Holderian functions with integrable singularities at the end-points (see Definition 13.1). We recall that it consists of functions of the form
(30.43) where et > 0, e2 > 0 and cp* (z) is Holderian on [a, b) . As for the right-hand sides f(z) and g(z), we assume that
f(z), g(x) E H� ,
(30.44)
where H� is the space defined in (13.53) or (13.59). This is justified by Theorem 13.14, stating that fractional integration of order a maps the space H* onto H� one-to-one. Comparing the setting of the question with that of the case of the whole axis, we remark that the difference in choice of the space for the solution is caused by
§ 30. THE GENERALIZED ABEL INTEGRAL EQUATION
617
the fact, that Holder spaces are not convenient for the whole axis . This is because of specificity connected with the infinite point (although they may be used, too), while the spaces Lp on the interval [a, b] prove to be less convenient than H* since it is not easy then to characterize singularities on the right-hand sides. As regards the coefficients u(x) and v(x), we assume that
u(x ) , v ( x) E H�([a, b]), � > o: ; u2 (x ) + v2 (x ) ¢ 0, x E [a, b].
(30.45)
As in § 30.2, the method used to solve the considered equation will be based on the connection between fractional integrals via a singular integral. In this case (11.16)-(11.19) will be used. Solution of the generalized A bel equation with exterior coefficients. A.
We rewrite
(30.41) in terms of the fractional integration (2.17)-(2.18):
(30.46) One can eliminate 16_cp or 1:+ cp using (11.18) or (11.19), respectively. Both ways are equivalent and give the solutions which differ only in form. Substituting the fractional integral 16_cp from (11.18) into (30.46) , we arrive at the singular equation
a l (x ) � (x ) + a27r(x )
b
j t�(t) dt a
-X
=
f (x) , (b - X ) a
(30.47)
where
a 1 (x) = u(x) + v (x) cos o: 1r, a2 ( x) v ( x) sin a1r =
and
�
x
( )
z:
=
1 cp(t)dt . (b - x)a J (x - t) l-a a
(30.48) (30.49)
Thus we have to solve the singular equation (30.47) and then invert the Abel � equation (30.49). In this process we must take care to find such solutions of (30.47), for which (30.49) is solvable. We use well known results (Gahov [1] and Muskhelishvili [1]) from the theory of singular equations on an open curve, the finite interval in our case. Let
(30.50)
618
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
in correspondence with §
30.1, where the value of O(z) is fixed by the condition 0 � O(a) < 211" ,
{30.51)
and let x be the integer (30.15). We solve (30.47) basing ourselves on Theorem 30.2 and taking into account the fact that the right-hand side of (30.47) is in H* , if I E n:. In the case X 2: 0 we obtain z
I (z - t) 1 - a = cp(t)dt
a
a 2 (z) Zo (z) a (z) (z a) P• (b - z ) a+ P•px-1 ( z) + 1 l(z) A(z) A(z) _
_
a 2 (z) �o (z) 1rA(z)
fb ( zt -- aa ) P• ( bb -- zt ) a+p, a
where A(z) and Zo (z) are the functions
/J a
= 1 - na -
l(t)dt Zo (t)(t - z) (30.52)
(30.31) and (30.16' ),
O(a)
2 11" ,
(30.53)
and Px - 1 { z) is a polynomial of degree x - 1 with arbitrary coefficients ( Px -1 ( z) = 0 in the case x = 0). It remains to invert {30.52) as the Abel equation relative to cp(t). The principal fact that we are to investigate is to discover whether the right-hand side of (30.52) allows the solution of this equation. Since we need to find any solution cp E H* , we need to clarify, by Theorem 13.14, whether the right-hand side belongs to the space n:, if l(z) E n:. We begin with the following lemma. Lemma 30.2.
The weighted singular operator
b(
) ( )
b - z P " -1 f z - a P • -l(t) dt sP • , p , I - b-t t-z 1r t-a _
a
--
maps the space n: onto itself provided that a - 1 < IJ a � a and a - 1 < /J b � a . Proof. Let Ht'(et , e2 ) b e the space maps Ht'(e 1 , e 2 ) onto itself, if
(13.51).
By Theorem
11.1 the operator Sp.,p,
619
§ 30. THE GENERALIZED ABEL INTEGRAL EQUATION
Since H: is a union {13.53) of the spaces H6(t 1 , t2 ), the operator s,... ,,... then preserves this union invariant, if Pa � a < 1 + and which � a < 1+ coincides with the assumptions of the lemma. • We turn now to the right-hand side of (30.52) and recall that /(t) E H:. By Theorem 11.1 we have Zo(z) E H6([a, b]). Since multiplication by a function belonging to H>.([a, b]) ,\ > a preserves the space H�, the right-hand side of (30.52) belongs to H: by Lemma 30.2, provided that
Jla
Jlb
a - 1 < Pa � a, a - 1 < Jib � a. By
Jib
(30.54)
(30.53), in order to satisfy the latter of these conditions we need to choose (30.55)
As regards the former condition, we have
nna = 0,1, a=
if if
O(a)/(211") < 1 - a , O(a)/(211") � 1 - a,
(30.56)
and then the index (30.15) takes the form x=
(we recall that
{ 1, [ O(b) 2 11" ] + 0,
if O(a) if O(a)
(1 - a)21r, � (1 - a)21r
<
(30.57)
0 � O(a) < 211" ).
O(a) = (1 - a)21r corresponds to the case u(a) = 0. Thus the integer n a and nb being chosen by (30.55) and (30.56), the right-hand side of (30.52) belongs to H:, and therefore (30.52) is solvable relative to cp by Theorem 13.14. Inverting this Abel equation, we obtain the general solution of the generalized Abel equation (30.41) in the case x � 0: Remark 30.1. The relation
sin a1r d j� u(t) +v(t) cos a1r f(t)dt (x) = � + CJ:
cp
1:-1
_
a
b v(t)Zo(t) dtj ( x - a ) "'• ( b - z ) "'• + a f(s)ds ( sin1ra1r ) 2 .!!_dx J� A(t)(x - t) a s-a b-s Zo(s)(s - t) ' a
a
(30.58)
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
620
where Ci are arbitrary constants and
(30 .59)
G
with
Z0 (t) and A(t) functions (30.16') and (30.31) and
{ -8(a)/(21r),
if 0 5 8(a)/(21r) < 1 - a, 1 - 8(a)/(21r), if 1 - a 5 8(a)/(21r) < 1, l' b = 8(b)/(21r) - [8(b)/(21r)] - 1.
l' o
=
B y interchanging the order of integration
X
L...J Ck <J'k (z) +
-
sin a1r 1r
(30.60)
(30.58) is transformed to d 1 /C(z, t)f t)dt, ( dz b
(30.61)
a
where
/C(z, t ) _-
u(t) + v(t) cos a1r (z t ) + A(t) _
-a
We can transform also (30.58) to another form not containing integrals in the principal value sense. In view of (11.16) we have •
sm a1r
--
1r
Replacing here
s - a) 1 ( -t-a b
a
a
= - cos a1r
v
( ) + + Ib - <1' · -n a a
a
a by 1 - a, we obtain the representation of the singular integral in
621
§ 30. THE GENERALIZED ABEL INTEGRAL EQUATION
the form sin a?r -1r
,
o
)
t , cJe d (-t - a t -a
f
sin a 1r
8 -
€
( 30.62) Applying this representation to the singular integral in the last term in ( 30.58 ) , we arrive at sin cx1r d
-1
�
j A(t)u(t)f(t) (z - t) a dt a
d j v(t)Z(t)dt d j dr j
2
t
�
a
,
T
a
( 30.63) where
Z(t) = (t - a) l-a+ l'• (b - t) a +�£• Zo(t). case x < 0, the singular equation ( 30.47 )
As regards the Theorem 30.2 if and only if
�t){:t } at' d) + 0 , J Zo(z z - a �'• b - z a �£•
is solvable by
,
=
k = 1, . . . , l xl .
( 30.64)
a
If these conditions are satisfied, ( 30.47) has a unique solution which is given by the same resulting relation ( 30.52) with the term containing P. _ 1 (z), being omitted. The final result of this investigation is stated in the following theorem. Theorem 30.5.
Let the assumptions in ( 30.45) be satisfied, let + e -a w i v(z) O(z) = arg u(z) u (z ) + e a"'•v. (z ) ,
0 ::; O(a) < 21r,
and let x be the integer ( 30.57) . The generalized Abel equation ( 30.41 ) is unconditionally solvable in the space n• for each right-hand side f(z) E H!, if x 2:: 0, in particular, if O(b) 2:: 0. Its general solution is given by ( 30.58 ) or ( 30.63) . If x < 0, the equation is solvable if and only if the conditions in (30.64) are
622
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
satisfied and then it has the unique solution given by (30.58) or (30.63) under the choice crc = 0. B. Solution of the generalized Abel equation with the interior coefficients.
As in the case of the whole axis, the equation with interior coefficients is easier because we are to solve the Abel equation first and afterwards the singular equation. Equation (30.42), that is
is transformed by means of (11.16) to
Inverting the Abel equation relative to the expression in the square brackets, we obtain the singular equation
a1 (x),P(x) + .!_I a2t(t),P(t) - x dt = g1 (z) , b
1r
(30.65)
iJ
where
a1 (z) and a2 (x) are the same as in (30.48) and ,P(z) = ( z - a)a
sin a1r 1r
(z
(30.66)
(t)dt a)a .!!. dx._ I (xg - t)a . �
_
iJ
It remains to solve (30.65). Its solvability is determined by the same integer :x as above and the expression for its solutions is known - Gahov [1] or Muskhelishvili [1]. The derivation of the final result is left to the reader.
30.4. The case of constant coefficients We consider especially the generalized Abel equations (30.42) in the case when the coefficients are constant.
(30.17), (30.18) and (30.41),
§ 30. THE GENERALIZED ABEL INTEGRAL EQUATION
623
A. Equation on the whole axis.
If the coefficients u and v are constant, the solution of (30.17) may be obtained avoiding an application of the general theory of singular integral equations with variable coefficients (but the connection with the singular integral, as before) . Let us consider these equations given in the form (30.17'):
M a cp = _1_ r(a)
00
j Ct + c2sign (z - t) cp(t)dt = /(z) ,
z E R1 ,
lz - tp-Ot
- oo
(30.67)
where 0 < a < 1, Ct and c2 are constants, ci + c� #; 0. The factor 1 /f(a) is taken for symmetry with the inverse operator. We note that the integral M01 cp is the Feller potential considered in § 12. The following theorem presents the explicit form for the inverse operator (M01) - 1 . We stress that the integrals in (30.68) are interpreted as conventionally convergent in the norm of the space Lp (R1 ) . They converge also almost everywhere.
Equation (30.67) is solvable in Lp (R1 ) 1 < p < 1 /a for any right-hand side /(z) E l01(Lp ) and has the unique solution
Theorem 30.6.
,
a
cp(z) = Af(1 - a) a
= Af{1 - a)
,
00
.
f Ct + c2signl(z+ - t) [/(z)
-oo
lz - tl a
00
_
j 2ct /(z) - (ct + c2)/(zl+-at) - (ct - c2)/(z t
0
(30.68)
f(t)]dt +
t) dt
'
where A = 4[c� cos2 (a1f/2) + c� sin(a1f/2)]. Proof. We have
(cf. (12.10)) . So the connection the singular operator yields.
(11.10) between the fractional integration I±_
and
(30.69) with a 1
= u + v cos a1r and a2 = v sin a1r.
Since S2 cp :: -cp by ( 11 . 2 ) , the singular
624
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
operator N with constant coefficients is invertible and
Inverting the Abel equation in operator, we obtain
(30.69)
by Theorem
6.1
and then the singular
(30.70) where D+ is the Marchaud fractional derivative from (11.11') into (30.70), we obtain
(5.57), (5.60). Substituting SD+f (30.71)
which gives (30.68). • We single out the important particular cases of (30.67): 00
f -oo
00
f sign (x - t) ,P (t)dt = g(x),
l()(t)dt lx - ti l-a = f(x),
lx - ti l-a
-oo
l()(t), ,P(t) E Lp(R1 ), 1 < p < 1/o:, and f(x), g(x) E Ia (Lp)· (30.68) solutions of these equations are given by the relations
where
(30.72) According to
00
1r f(x) - f(t) dt tg 0: j l()( X) - � 2 11' 2 lx - tl l +a ' - oo _
(30.73)
00
o: o:1r g(x) - g(t) ,P (x) = 2 11' ctg 2 j lx _ tl l +a st. gn (x - t)dt. - oo
(30.74)
Thus we have obtained the inversion of the potentials 1a and H a see (12.1), (12.2), (12.1') and (12.2'). In the case of sufficiently good functions /(x) and g(x), e.g. differentiable ones and those such that 1 /(x)l � c(1 + lxl) - ", v > 1 - o:, these relations may also be written in the form
l()(X ) =
_.!._ tg o:1r .!!._
21r
2 dX
00
f sign (x - t) f(t)dt,
- oo
Ix - t Ia
(30.75)
625
§ 30. THE GENERALIZED ABEL INTEGRAL EQUATION
1 a?r d ctg .,P(x) = 21r 2 dx
00
g(t)dt lx - tier ·
f
-
oo
(30.76)
We note that a simple condition on the right-hand side /(x), sufficient for the solvability of (30.67), is that it may be represented in the form (30.77) Then f(x) E Jer ( Lp ) , 1 < p < 1/a, by Theorem 6.6 and so (30.67) is solvable in Lp . For functions f(x) of the form (30.77), the inversion given in (30.68) may be also written in the form
d
00
j c2 + clx1s-igntier(x - t) f(t)dt.
(30.78)
- oo
Equation on the interval.
As regards the equation
� f u
b
a<x<
b,
(30.79)
with 0 < a < 1 and constant u and v, we shall obtain its solution from the general relation (30.58). The function O(x) from (30.50) is now constant: 0( x) = 0 = arg
( it is clear that 0 = 0
u + e - er 1ri v , u + eer ..•v .
0 < 0 < 21r
(30.80)
if and only if v = 0).
The inequalities 0 < 0 < (1 - a)21r and ( 1 - a)21r < 0 < 21r are equivalent to the inequalities uv < 0 and uv > 0, respectively. <•+2•ar)i Proof. From (30.80) we have ; = 1 - �,1 _ 1 e -er1r a . Since 1 - eu = - 2 ie /2 x
Lemma 30.3.
·
sin( z /2 ) , we obtain
! _ sin ([O - (1 - a)21r]/2)
v-
which easily yields what is required. •
sin(0/2)
•
•
u
626
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
We derive from Lemma 30.3 that the index x, defined in (30.57) , of (30.79) equals 1 if the coefficients u and v are of the same signs and equals 0, if they have different signs. We conclude then from (30.58) that the generalized Abel equation (30.79) with the coefficients u and v of different signs has a non-trivial solution in the case f(x ) = 0:
�
J -a - 9/(211') (b - t)a- 1+9/(211')dt <po (z) = .!!._ dx (x - t ) (t - a)
1 a
1 d ( b z ) a-1+9/(2r) ds = - s -a (l - s ) - 9/(2r) s + -� x-a _
0
( b - a ) ( 1 - a - (} /( ( x - a) 2 _
21r)) f1 s-a (1 0
_
( ) a- 2+9/(211') ds. s ) - 9/{211') s + xb -- Xa
Applying ( 13.18), we obtain const <po (z ) = (x - a )a+9/(211') (b - z) 1 - 9/{211') ,
0 < (} < (1 - a ) 2 .
7r
(30.81)
Taking (30.63) and (30.81) into account we state the resulting conclusion in the following theorem.
Equation (30.79) is solvable in the space H* whatever the right-hand side f(x) E H; was. The solution is unique, if uv > 0, and contains one arbitrary constant, if uv < 0. All the solutions are given by the fonnula
Theorem 30. 7.
�
c u sin a1r d f(t ) dt cp (x) (x - a)a+ 9/(2"") (b - z) 1 - 9/(211') + A -1r- dx j (x - t)a a
-
v A
( sin n1r-) 2 d f� Z(t)dt)a d f dr 1 f b
t
1r
dx
a
(x - t dt
a
(t - r) -a
T
f(s)ds Z(s ) (s - r) { ao .82)
where c = 0, if uv > 0, and c is arbitrary, if uv < 0, and A = u2 + 2uv cos a1r + v 2 ; Z(t ) = (t - a) 2 -a- 9/(2,.. ) (b - t ) a - 1+ 9/(2"") , if uv > 0, and Z(t) = [(t - a) /(b t )p -a- 9/(211') , if UV < 0. Let us consider the following important particular cases. The Carleman
§ 30.
THE GENERALIZED ABEL INTEGRAL EQUATION
627
equation
J lxcp-(t)dttp- a b
= f(x)
(30.83)
a
which attracted the attention of many authors (see references in § 34.1) is contained in (30.79) under the choice u = v = 1 . The result in (30.82) gives its unique solution if we choose c = 0 and A = 4 cos2
( )
a/2 Z(t) = tb -- at
a1r , 2
By simple calculations it may be shown that (30.83) with the right-hand sides
f(x) = (x - a) n ,
n
= 0, 1, 2, . . . ,
and
f(x) = [(x - a)(b - x)]
has the solution
respectively. There exists another inversion formula for the Carleman equation (30.83):
cp (x)
tg (a1r/2) d = dx 21r
b
j sign (x -a t) f(t)dt lx - tl
a
sin2 (a1r /2) d + 21r2 dx
j M(x ' t)[(t - a)(b - t)] - a/2f(t)dt ' b
a
where
J b
- a)(b - y) M(x,t) = J(t - a)(b - t)t -- J(y y a
-
-
dy �-=---� ( l - a)/2 lx - Y":""-:"-:-----:� la [(y - a)(b - y)]
X -:--
(30.84)
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
628
Compare this with (30.75) . Let us prove this result. Equation (30.52) in application to the considered particular case {30.83) has the form
:t: (t)dt f (z
_
=
a
On the other hand, since (30.83), we have
_!_ tg 211"
a1r 16 [ (z - a)(b - z) ] a/2 f(t)dt. 2
(t - a)(b - t) t - z
a
{30.85)
6 2 ! /(z) + _!_ tg a1r f (z - a)(b - z) 01/ f(t) dt . f6 (t
{30.86)
a
:t:
Inverting (30.85) and (30.86) as Abel equations and summing up the result, we obtain the relation 2 1-as
2
=
2B
(
where ( 12.44), (12.45) and (12.48) are used for brevity. By simple transformations we represent the second term as
X
f6 It -dtzl01 f6 ([ r(r(t)T) ] 01/2 [ r(r(t)T) ] (l - a)/ 2) f(TT-)dtT ' _
a
r(t) (t -
a
t) .
= where a)(b - We apply ( 12.47) to the first term here, after which (30.84) is obtained by simple calculations. As regards another particular case
f6 sign lz -ti(z l--at) 'f/J(t)dt g(z) =
(30.87)
a
this differs from (30.83) by the fact that the corresponding homogeneous equation has a non-trivial solution. The result in (30.82) yields the general solution of (30.87):
§ 31 . EQUATIONS WITH POWER-TYPE KERNELS
629
:&
c 1 a1r d f g(t)dt ,P (z) (z - a)(l +a)/ 2 (6 - z) (l+ a)/ 2 + 21r ctg 2 dz (z - t) a
z: 2 c T d f (t - a ) ( 1 - a)/ 2 dt + 1r2 dz 6 - t (z - t) a
Cl
os
Cl
( )
t b d f dT f 6 - s ( 1 -a )/2 g(s)ds (s - T) a · (t - T) l -a T s - a X dt Cl
(30.88)
The relation
b
cos2 � 2
d j N(z, t)(t - a)(l - a)/ 2 (6 - t)(l - a)/ 2 g(t)dt, - 21r2 dz Cl
(30.89)
is also valid, where b
N(z, t) = f .j(t - a)(6 - t) - .j(y - a)(6 - y) t-y
Cl
X
sign ( z - y)dy lz - Yl a [(y - a)(6 - y)](l - a)/2 .
Its derivation is similar to that of (30.84) .
§ 3 1 . The Noether Nature of Equations of the First Kind with Power-Type Kernels In this section we shall investigate the problem of normal solvability and the index ( Noether nature) , properly interpreted, for equations of the first kind:
M VJ = f lzc(z,t) - ti l - a VJ(t)dt = /(z), 0
z E 0, 0 = [a, 6], -oo :5 a < 6 :5 oo.
(31 .1)
630
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
The generalized Abel equations, considered in §30, are their particular cases. We shall reduce (31.1) to an equivalent integral equation of the second kind. The latter will be in general singular. We give first the necessary preliminaries from the theory of N oether operators and from the theory of singular integral equations. Then we shall consider the case of the whole axis n = R1 , and in conclusion deal with the case of a finite interval n = [a, b], -00 < a < b < 00.
3 1 . 1 . Preliminaries on Noether operators We give here the bare minimum concerning Noether operators, which is necessary for the presentation of questions on the solvability of (31.1). These questions are developed in §§ 31.2 and 31.3. The theorems about the Noether properties of operators in abstract Banach spaces given below are known as the Nikol 'skii Atkinson-Gohberg theorems. More details on the theory of N oether operators can be found in the books of Gohberg and Krupnik [4] and S.G. Krein [1]; see also references in § 34.1 . Let X and Y b e Banach spaces. The ring of all linear operators bounded from X into Y will be denoted by [X --+ Y]. Definition 31.1.
The set Zx(A) = {
of all zeros of the operator A in the space X is called the kernel A E [X --+ Y] . For the adjoint operator A* E [Y* --+ X*] we denote similarly
of the operator
Zy· (A* ) = { ,P : A*,P = 0, ,P E Y* }. This subspace in Y* is called
the co-kernel of the operator A.
The operator A E [X Y] is called normally solvable in X if its range A(X) consists of elements orthogonal to the co-kernel:
Definition 31.2.
/ = A
--+
,P E Zy· (A*).
The operator A E [X --+ Y] is normally solvable in X if and only if its range A( X) is closed in the space Y .
Theorem 31.1.
We introduce the following notation for the dimensions of the kernel and co-kernel:
n = nA = dim Zx (A),
m
= rnA = dim Zy· (A* ).
§ 31 . EQUATIONS WITH POWER-TYPE KERNELS
631
The number rnA is called the deficiency number of the operator A. Sometimes both numbers rnA and nA are called the deficiency numbers, the former of them being also known as the nullity of the operator.
The operator A E [X -+ Y] is called the Noether or Noetherian operator, if it is normally solvable in X and its kernel and co-kernel are finite-dimensional: n < oo, m < oo. The ordered pair ( n, m) is called the dimensional characteristic or d characteristic of the operator A . The difference x = n - m is called the index of the operator. We shall use the designation x = xx -y (A) and write xx (A) in the case X = Y. It is known that the index of the operator is stable Definition 31.3.
relative to small perturbations. For Noether operators the following statements hold. Theorem 31.2. If A E [X -+ Y] the operator BA E [X -+ Z] is also xx - z (B A)
and B E [Y -+ Z] are Noether operators, then Noetherian, and
= xx -y (A) + Xy-z (B) .
If the operator A E [X -+ Y] is Noetherian and T is a completely continuous operator from X into Y , then the operator A + T is also Noetherian, and xx-y (A + T) = xx-y(A) .
Theorem 31.3.
The operator A E [X -+ Y] is Noetherian if and only if it admits the left and right regularizers R, E [Y -+ X] and R,. E [X -+ Y]: R,A = E + T1 and AR,. = E + T2 , where Tt and T2 are operators completely continuous in X and Y, respectively. Theorem 31.4.
The usual examples of N oether operators are the singular integral operators and (30.10). We recall known results concerning the Noether properties of these operators which will be needed below.
(30.1), (30.8)
Theorem 31.5.
The singular integral operator a (x) No tp = a t (x)tp(x) + 2 1r
00
j tpt (-t)dxt
-oo
=
f (x)
(31.2)
where a 1 (x), a 2 (x) E C(R1 ) and are real-valued, is Noetherian in the complex valued space L,(R1 ), 1 < p < oo, if and only if a�(x) + a�(x) :/ 0, x E R1 . The operator No has the d-characteristic (x, 0) if x � 0 and (0, l xl ) if x :5 0, where x is the integer (30.4).
632
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
A similar operator on a finite interval will be considered with a "regular" term: ,
,
N
(31 .3)
Cl
In the case of an interval the conditions of normal solvability and the relation giving the index are already dependent on the space of the solutions. We shall give two known assertions. The first will concern the "classical" setting of the question of normal solvability, when one considers the orthogonality to solutions not of the adjoint equation N* ,P = 0, but of the homogeneous tmnsposed equation: ,
,
a 1 (z) ,P (z) - .!.1r j a2t(t)¢(t) - z dt + J K(t, z) ,P (t)dt = 0. Cl
(31 .4)
Cl
and solutions of (31 .3) are sought in the space of functions, Holderian in (a, b) and having integrable singularities at the end-points with non-fixed orders. The second assertion will deal with the case when the Noether nature is interpreted in the sense of Definition 3 1 .3 and the operator in (31.3) is considered in the space Lp (p) with the weight function p(z) = (z - a)�'(b - z)". We recall that the coefficients a 1 (z) and a2 (z) in (31.3) and (31.4) are assumed to be real-valued. As regards the kernel K(z, t) we assume that
gn(z - t) , "'""( z, t ) = A(z, t) + lzB-(z,tlt)si l -e
0 < e � 1,
where A(z, t) and B (z, t) are functions, Holderian in both variables. Let H*, n: , H6 and H be the function spaces considered in § 30. 1. As previously in § 30. 1 , G(z) denotes
Since a 1 (z) and a 2 (z) are real-valued, we have G(z) = e il (z) . We consider the value of 0( z) = arg G( z) to be chosen by the condition 0 � 0( a) < 21r with 0( z) extended by continuity to other points z E (a, b). Theorem 31.6. Let a 1 (z), a2 (z) E H, ai{z) + a�(z) # 0, z E [a, b), and O(a) #; 0, O(b) #; 21rk, k = 0, ±1, ±2, . . . . Then (31.3) with the right-hand side /(z) satisfying the assumptions of Theorem 30.2, is solvable in the spaces H*, n: , H6 or H if
§ 31 . EQUATIONS WITH POWER-TYPE KERNELS
633
and only if b
j /(z)t/Jj (z)dz =
0,
(31.5)
a
where {tPj } is the complete system of solutions of (31.4) in the spaces H, H& , n: or n• , respectively. The difference of the numbers of linearly independent solutions of the homogeneous equation {31 .3) and of the solvability conditions given in (31 .5) is equal to the index x given by (30. 15) . Let a 1 (z), a 2 (z) E C([a, b]). The operator (31 .3) is Noetherian in the space Lp(p), 1 < p < oo, p(z) = (z - a)�'(b - z)", - 1 < I' < p - 1 , - 1 < v < p - 1, if and only if I) a�(z) + a�(z) -:# 0, a :5 z :5 b; II) 6(a) -:# 21r 1 !" , 6(b) -:# -21r � ( mod 21r). These conditions being satisfied, the index of the operator {91.9) is equal to
Theorem 31. 7.
[ 21r
"' = 6(b) + 1 + v p
] [ +
1 + I'
p
_ 6(a) 21r
]
(cf. {90. 15)). In the case tt(z, t) = 0 the operator given by d-characteristic (x, 0) if x � 0 and (0, lxl) if x :5 0.
(91.9}
has the
In the following subsections we consider the question of the Noether nature of the operator in (31.1). Equation {31. 1) as an equation of the first kind is not normally solvable generally speaking, so the question of its "Noetherness" requires the proper setting. The operator M will not be in general Noetherian as an operator acting from certain space X into the same space X . In the case X = Lp(R1) it is not even bounded from X into X - see the Hardy-Littlewood Theorem 5.3. If mesO < oo, the operator M is bounded in Lp(O), but M cannot be Noetherian as an operator from Lp(O) into Lp(O). Indeed, if M E [Lp(O) -+ Lp ( O )] is Noetherian, then by Theorem 31.4 there exists the bounded operator R such that RM = E + T, where T is completely continuous in X = Lp(O), mesO < oo , (under rather weak assumptions on c(z, t)), we see then that the identity operator E = RM - T is completely continuous in X, which is impossible. A natural question arises: may one construct, for the operator M non Noetherian from X into X , such a space Y that the operator M is Noetherian as an operator from X into Y? The construction of such a space for achieving Noether properties is sometimes called the normalization of the operator. By the Hardy-Littlewood Theorem 5.3 the operator M with a bounded function c(z, t) is bounded from Lp(O), 1 < p < 1/at, into £9(0), q = p/(1 - atp) . It is not, however, a Noetherian operator from Lp into L9 • Let us show this for c(z, t) = 1 . Correspondingly with Theorem 3 1 . 1 we have t o show that the range M(Lp) i s not closed in L9 • For c(z,t) = 1 by (30.34) we have M(Lp) = Ia (Lp) C L9 , where I a (Lp) is the space of fractional integrals. We recall that Ia (Lp) -:F L9 - see (6.5).
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
634
Since infinitely differentiable finite functions belong to Ia (Lp) as for example, by Theorem 6.5, the space Ia (Lp) is dense in L 9 and consequently is not closed in L 9 • In the general case under rather weak assumptions on c( z, t) we shall show that M ( Lp ) � Ia ( Lp) and that the range M ( Lp) is closed in I a ( Lp). In other words, we shall treat the operator M as Noetherian from Lp into Ia (Lp), the latter being considered as a Banach space relative to the norm (6.17).
31 .2. The equation on the axis The equations to be considered are 00
(M
f
-oo
c(z, t) lz _ ti l -a
(31.6)
We allow the function c(z, t) to be discontinuous on the diagonal t = z:
{
t < z, c( z, t) = u(z,t), v(z, t), t > z,
{31.7)
so that
(M
z
00
f v(z, t)
- oo
(z - t) -a
(t - z) -a
z
(31.6')
In the case of continuity at the diagonal (u(z, z - 0) = v(z, z + 0)) the operator M will always be of the Fredholm type i.e. with the index equal to zero, in the corresponding setting. It will be of the Fredholm type also, if, e.g. v(z, t) = 0. We define now the class of admissible functions u(z, t) and v(z, t) in (31.6). Let R� be the half-plane {{t, z) : t < z} and = {(t, z) : t > z } .
R2_
junction u(z, t) defined in the closed half-plane R� belongs to the class H;(R�) if i) u(z, z) E C(R1 ) ; ii) u(x, t) is Holderian in z of order A, 0 < A < 1, unifonnly with respect to t:
Definition 31.4. A
{31.8)
H;(R2_) is defined similarly. Writing c(z, t) E H;(Ri) will denote that u(z, t) E Hz (R+ ), v(z, t) E, Hz (R_ ). We observe that functions in H; ( .Ri) are bounded, but are not necessarily continuous in t. For example u(z, t) = z{l + z ) - 1 sign t E H;(.R�), A = 1. The class
�
-2
�
-2
2
§ 31 . EQUATIONS WITH POWER-TYPE KERNELS
M(Lp) C pr(Lp), 1 < p < 1/o:. We represent the operator M
A. Imbedding as
635
u(t, t)cp(t) dt + v(t, t) cp(t) dt + K+
00
(31.9)
_
_
00
where z
Ku+
u(z, t) - u(t , t)
J (x - t)l -a
(31.10)
00
v
_
(t - x -a
z
By means of (11.10) we obtain
(31.11) where
No
[u(z, z) + v(x, z) cos o:1r)
Theorem 31.8. If c(x, t) E
sin o:1r r
00
j v(t, t)
- oo
t-x
(31.12)
n;(Rl) with .\ > o:, then M(Lp) � Ia (Lp ) and (31.13)
Proof. By (31.11) and the boundedness of the singular operator in Lp( R1 ) (see Theorem 11.2) it is sufficient to prove the statement of the theorem for Kt
0
+ t a J[u(z, x-ts)- u(x-ts, z-ts))k(s)cp(z-ts)ds, 00
0
(31.14)
636
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
where k(s) is the function
(6.10). Let us prove (31.14). For /(z) = K!cp we have J(z) = J [u(z, z - s) - u(z - s, z - s)]sa- 1 cp(z - s)ds and so CX>
0
CX>
f(z)-f(z-t)=t a j (u(z, z-t-st)-u(z-t-st, z-t-st)](s+ 1) a- 1 cp(z-t-st)ds -1 CX>
-ta j (u(z-t, z-t-st)-u(z-t-st, z-t-st)]sa- 1 cp(z-t-st)ds 0
CX>
= j [u(z, z-t-s)-u(z-t, z-t-s)]sa- 1 cp(z-t-s)ds 0
CX>
+ta j k(s+1)[u(z, z-t-ts)-u(z-t-ts, z-t-ts)]cp(z-t-ts)ds, -1 which gives
(31.14).
By this result
_:!!__ u(z, z-t -s)-u(z-t, z-t -s) a tn (z-t-s)ds D a+ ,£ Ku+ cp f(1-a) JE t 1+a J0 s 1 -a CX>
CX>
r
+ r( l':.cr) J � J [u(z, z-ts) -u(z-ts, z-ts)]k(s)
CX>
According to (31.8)
c
CX>
CX>
g(z - t)dt I AE (z)l � (1 + lzl )>. j t 1 +a - >.(1 + l z - tl)>- ' g (z) _- j lcp(zS 1-- as) l ds . (31.16) 0 0
§ 31 . EQUATIONS WITH POWER-TYPE KERNELS
637
Here g(z) E L9(R1 ), q = p/( 1 - ap) , by Theorem 5.3, so
According to (6.32) the inner integral is dominated by
cll
c(1 + t) - .\f a , so II Ae llp �
0
B,(z) = r(l � a) J k (s)ds J u(z, z - t) - ;(z - t, z - t) cp(z - t)dl 0 00
00
u
or by ( 6. 11 )
B. (z) = - r(l� a) J k(s)ds J u(z, z - t) - ;(z - t, z - t) cp(z - t)dt e•
oo
0
0
dt j k(s)[u(z, z - ts) - u(z - ts, z - ts)]
Q
Hence
oo
dt j s.\ k(s)
oo
0
0
and applying the Minkowsky inequality, we obtain
I f e
oo
dt l i B. II, � c t t -A s .\ l k(s) l ds The inequality
{
_l
oo
l
} 1/p
a > 0, - oo
( 3 1 . 18)
( 3 1 . 19)
638
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FffiST KIND
is valid. Indeed let h > 0 since the case h < 0 is reduced to the former one by the change z = -y. Denoting the left-hand side of (31.19) by J (h), we have
f
00
J (h ) 5
0
11/1 ( -z)ldz (1 + z)•(l + z + h)• +
(f f) h/2 +
0
00
h /2
11/l (z) l dz (1 + z)•(l + lz - h i )•
h /2 00 � (1 + h) - 4111/l l h + j (1 + h - z) - 411/l (z) ldz + j (1 + z) - 4 11/l(z)l dz 0 h/2 -a � (1 + h) - 4111/llh + ( 1 + 2h ) 111/llh , which yields
(31.19).
By
(31.19) we obtain 00
£
IIBe llp � cll
0
from (31.18). The inner- integral is estimated as follows: 00
J(t) = j s>. lk(s)l(1 + ts) - >. ds � et -a
as
t --+ 0.
(31.20)
0
In fact since
lk(s)l � csa- 2 for s � 1, we have 00
J(t) � c + c j s>. +a - 2 (1 + ts) - >. ds 1 1 =c + c J e -a (e + t) ->. t:Ie 0
1/t 1 J a ->.e - a (1 + e) ->. de � et - a . =c + et 0
By
(31.20) (31.21)
639
§ 31 . EQUATIONS WITH POWER-TYPE KERNELS
and then, according to (31. 15) , II D+ , .:Kj
M
of the potential type by the
Theorem 6.1 allows one to invert the fractional integration to the right by fractional differentiation, provided that we deal with the range p:x(Lp ), i.e. If.Di./ = /, f E Ior (Lp ) · Hence the imbedding M(Lp ) � Ior (Lp) obtained in Theorem 31.8 allows to write
M
N = Di.M,
(31 .22)
1 < p < 1 /a .
The following lemma presents an explicit expression for the operator N. 31.1. Under the assumptions of Theorem 31.8 the operator N = D+M, with M the operator given by (31.6), has the form
Lemma
(31 .23 )
N = r (a) No + T,
where No is the singular operator given by (31 .12) and
( 31.24)
where a 7':!" - f( 1 a) u
00
X
(31.25)
0
0
S
d+t j v(x, x+t+s)-v(x+t, x+t+s)
T.-
00
!!__ f u(x, x-t -s)- u(x-t, x-t-s) f __!
00
The operators TJ and T"- can be also represented as �
T,}" tp = f( l � a) f T,}" (:r, T)tp(T)dT, -oo
T.- '1' = f l � ) ( a
J T.- (:r, T)tp( T)dT, 00
�
(31 .27)
640
where
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
T) - u(t, T) T.+ (z ' T) = 1 (z u(z, 1+a (t - T) l -a dt t) T �
u
1 1 _ 1 u(z, T) - u(T + s(z - T), T] ds - z-T ' s 1 -a (l - s) l + a 0
_ _
_
Tv
(
(31.28)
T) - v(z, t) dt z, T) = 1 (t -v(z, 1+ z) a (T - t) 1 -a T
�
1 1 _ 1 v(z, T) - v[z , z + s(T - z)] ds . - T-z s 1+a (l - s) 1 -a 0 _ _
Proof. From (31.11) we have D+M
D+Kt
Di./ = cos a1rD� / + sin a1rSD� f
so
(31.29)
for f E Ia (L,). Since K;
dt 1 u(z, z - t - s) - u(z - t, z - t - s) t" (z - t - s)ds 1 1+ s 1 -a r(1 - a t a 00
a
)
00
T
0
0
+ r(1 - a) 1 k(s)ds 1 u(z, z - t) - tu(z - t, z - t) cp(z a
00
0
00
0
_
t)dt.
(31.30)
The pass age to the limit here is easily justified if it is in the norm of Lp . It is not difficult to show that the integrals in (31.23) exist not only in the sense of convergence in the £,-norm, but in the usual sense also for almost all z. In (31.30) the second term is identically zero in view of (6.11). Expression (31.26) can be deduced by obvious symmetry arguments. The representation (31.27) and (31.29) are obtained by easy transformations. • Remark 31.1. It follows from Theorem 31.8 that the operator T in (31.23) is bounded in L,(R1 ) at least, if 1 < p < 1/a. It will be shown below that the
§ 31. EQUATIONS WITH POWER-TYPE KERNELS
641
operator is completely continuous in Lp(R1 ). Now we observe that the kernels (31.28) admit the estimates
c(x - ) >.- l IT_i (x, r) l � (1 + rlxl) >- , which follow from (31.28) by (31.8), c being a constant. C. The Noether nature of the operator M.
The previous consideration paved the way for the result on the Noether nature of (31.6). Let c(x, t) be of the form (31.7). Theorem 31.9. Let c(x, t) E H; ( .R�J with � > a. The operator M is Noetherian from the space Lp(R1), 1 < p < 1/a, into the space Ia (Lp) if and only if
(31.31) Under this condition the index of the operator M is equal to XLp-Jor(Lp)( M )
=
� j d {c1 (x) 00
arg
+ ic2 (x)tg
-oo
where c1 (x) = u (x, x) + v(x, x), c2 (x) = u(x, x) - v(x, x).
a11" 2}
(31.32)
Proof. Since � > a the imbedding M (Lp) � 1a (Lp) and the representation in (31.22) are valid by Theorem 31.8. Elementary arguments show that the property
of the operator M to be Noetherian from Lp into /a ( Lp) is equivalent to that of the operator N from Lp into Lp . The condition (31 .31) is necessary and sufficient by Theorem 31.5 for the operator No to be Noetherian and under this condition the index of the operator No is equal to the integer (31.25). So in correspondence with Theorem 31.3, it is sufficient to show that the operator T is completely continuous in Lp(R1 ) . Since a composition of a bounded and continuous operator is a completely continuous operator again, we observe by (31.24) and the similarity of the operators TJ" and T; that it remains to prove the complete continuity of the operator TJ only. We give this statement separately in the following lemma.
If u(x, t) E H; (Ji�), � > a, then the operator TJ" is completely continuous in Lp (R1), 1 < p < 1/a.
Lemma 31.2.
Proof.
We check the Riesz criterion
(31.33)
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
642
(J
� I> N
)
l(ti" cp)(z) IP dz .
l/P � q(N) II 'I' II, , 'I (N) N-::oo 0,
(31 .34)
which guarantees (see Dunford and Schwartz [1, p.324]) the complete continuity of the operator Tj . We observe that the representation of the operator Tj given in (31.27) and (31.28) ''works well" for checking (31.33), while (31.25) is well-matched to (31.34). We denote F(z) = (Tjcp)(z). By (31 .27) we have �+ 6
F(z + 6) - /(z) =
�
j Tj(z + 6, T)
�
The estimate for A1 is simple in view of (31.8):
�c
f6 (6 - T).\- l dTII
Further,
We represent Tj(z + T + 6, z) - Tj(z + T, z) �+ T A1 =
f �
A2
_
-
u(z + T + 6, z) - u(z + T, z) dt (z + T + 6 - t) l+ a (t - z) l -a
� + T+ 6
f
�+ T
as
A1
'
u(z + T + 6 , z) - u(t, z) (z + T + 6 - t) l+ a (t - z) l -a dt
'
+ A2 + A3 where
(31 .35)
§ 31 . EQUATIONS WITH POWER-TYPE KERNELS
643
z+ T u(z + T, z) - u(t, z) dt. Aa = f [(z + T + 6 - t) - 1 -a - (z + T - t) - 1 -a ) (t - z) l -a . z Let us estimate A 1 first:
where
(13.18) is used. Thus >. -a !Al l :::; cl (1 + lz6+ rl)>-rl -a .
The estimate for A2 is obtained similarly and coincides with applying the mean value theorem to A3, we have
where 0
where
< e < 6/r,
(31.36) (31.36).
so
c 1 = c1 (e) and 0 < e < .\ - a.
By the estimates for A� , A2 and Aa we have
a(r)dr IIA2 IIP <- c6e f rl ->.+e + c6>.- a f a(r)dr rl -a '
a(r) =
Further,
{_[ (1
00
00
0
0
+ lz + ri) - >-P i fP(z) IPdz
}
�p
(31.37)
0 :::; a(r) :::; llfP IIP and it is easily shown that llall9 :::; KllfP IIp for q > max(p, 1/ .\ ), where K = K(q). The where
.
It is clear that
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
644
T 1 (31.37) T_ , T)dT cl
c
so
00
00
s
s.
I(ti
0
as
)
(
(
00
o
c
(
)
0
1 /p
sl - a as
(
>.fa
_
a;
)
)
00
0
•
second kind
00
a1r v(t, t) (t)dt + T
sin
- oo
§ 31. EQUATIONS WITH POWER-TYPE KERNELS
645
where T is the completely continuous operator. Theorem 31 .6 yields the following corollary.
Let u2 (z, z)+v 2 (z, z) =f. 0, z E R1 • Equation (31.6) with the right-hand side f(z) in Ia (Lp) is solvable in Lp , 1 < p < 1 /o:, if and only if
Corollary.
J 1/J; (z)(D+ J)(z)dz = 0, 00
-
oo
j = 1 , . . . , m,
where 1/J; (z) is a complete system of linearly independent solutions of the homogeneous singular equation N* ,P = 0, adjoint to (31.38). D . Regularization of operators of potential type.
In the conclusion of this subsection we consider the problem of a regularization of (31.6), i.e. reducing it to a Fredholm equation, not a singular one. Our goal will be an effective construction - in the explicit form - of the regularizer for the operator M, treated in correspondence with Theorem 31.4. This regularizer will be the operator o: sin O: ?r
Rf = ?rA(z)
00
j lzco-(z,t 11t)+a [/(z) - f(t)]dt,
(31.39)
-oo
where
A(z) = u2 (z, z) + 2u(z, z)v(z, z) cos o:?r + v2 (z, z), u(z, z), t < z, co ( z, t ) = v(z, z), t > z.
{
Let c(z, t) E n;(Ji�J and let u(z, z), v(z, z) E H>.. ( R1), A > o: . If u2 (z, z) + v 2 (z, z) =f. 0, z E R1 , then the open.dor (31.39) is a regularizer of the operotor (31.6) : (31 .40 ) RMtp = tp + T'tp, MR/ = I + T''J,
Theorem 31.10.
where T' and T" are operotors, completely continuous an respectively. Proof. First of all we remark that the operator
Lp
and
1a ( Lp),
R is bounded from Ia (Lp) into
646
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
Lp. To see this, we rewrite the operator R in terms of fractional differentiation: z) a v(z, z) a RI = ru(z, (a)A(z) (D+ /)(z) + r (a)A(z) (D_f)( z) ' after which the estimate II R/ IIp � cii / III.. (L. ) follows immediately from Theorem 6.1 and ( 1 1 . 1 1"). It follows from Lemma 31.2 that the operator z
1_ u(z, z) - u(t,t) cp(t )dt (u I+a I+a u) cp - r (a) J (z - t) l- a -oo _
_
_
is completely continuous from Lp into Ia (Lp), if u(z) E H >. ('.k1 ), � > a. So, while considering the composition RM and M R, we may interchange the operation of multiplication by a Holderian function with the operators I+ and I�. According to (31 .9) we have M = M0 +T1 7 where M0cp = r (a)I+(ucp) + r (a) J�(vcp) and T1 is an operator completely continuous from Lp into Ia (Lp) (see Lemma 31.2) . Therefore,
RMcp = A1 (uD� + vD�)(ui+ + vl�)cp + T2 cp = 1 [(u2 + v 2 )cp + uD�I�vcp + vD � I+ucp] + T3 cp, A where T2 and Ta are operators completely continuous in Lp (R1 ) . Since D+I�cp = cos a1rcp + sin a1rScp and D� I+cp = cos a1rcp - sin a1rScp by (11.10) and ( 1 1 .1 1) , we have
RMcp = ! [(u2 + v2 + 2uv cos a1r)cp + sin a1r(uSv - vSu)cp] + T3cp.
The operator uSv - vSu is completely continuous in Lp(R1 ) , 1 < p < oo , since Su - uS is - see for example Gohberg and Krupnik [4, p. 33] . So RMcp = cp + T'cp, where T' is completely continuous in Lp . The validity of the second part ( 31 .40 ) is verified similarly. •
31.3. Equations on a finite interval Let us consider the operators of a potential type in the form
Mcp -= u(z)
b
cp(t)dt cp(t)dt J (z t)l -a + v(z) J (t _ z)l -a + J T(z, t)cp(t)dt _
a
= /(z)
b
z
z
a
( 31 .41 )
§ 31 . EQUATIONS WITH POWER-TYPE KERNELS
647
and investigate them from the point of view of the proper setting of the problem of normal solvability. In the end of this subsection we shall obtain the statement on the N oether nature of the operator M as an operator from Lp into JC�(Lp) = Ia[Lp(a, b)]. In such a setting the adjoint operator M* is interpreted as an operator from the space Ia (Lp)* = n:+ (Lp ) of generalized functions into Lp' · In view of wide applications of such equations on a finite interval, we shall be also interested in the "classical" setting of the problem, when · instead of the adjoint operator M* one deals with the transposed operator · M T '· _
b
�
b
v(t) fjJ(t)dt _ ' + J (tu(t)- fjJz)(t)dt l -a + J T(t, z)·.,.,·(t )dt - g (z ) .,., _ J (z - t) l - a � G
(31 .42)
G
and the spaces of solutions tp and 1/J are characterized in simple terms, being in general topological spaces and not Banach ones. A.
Reduction to the equation with the Cauchy kernel
Applying (11.18) and ( 1 1 .16) to (31.41) and (31 .42), respectively, we reduce them after elementary transformations to the equations with the Cauchy kernel:
a1 (z
a 1 (z
) Ai. ( '�if
) ·'·(
.,.,
a z) + a2 (z)(b - �)
7r
z) _
b
�(t)dt JG (b - t)a (t - z) + K
Ai. '�if
=
/ { z) ,
b
a2 (t)(b - t) a fjJ (t )dt K* ·'· _ (z) , 1r (b - z ) a J t - z . + .,., - 9t 1
(31.43 )
(31 .44 )
IJ
where
a t (z) and a2 (z) are functions (30.48) and b
�
�(z) = J tp(t)(z - t)a - l dt, 9t (z) = G
K-t =
r(�{D�+/,
.
SID
�c:t7r) ddZ J g(t)(t - z)a- l dt,
K· ., =
�
r( )
o:_r.,,
(31.45)
(31.46)
where T is the integral operator with the kernel T(z, t) and r is its transposed operator. It is necessary to remark that the "right-hand" representation r = If_ Df_ TT used in the pass age to (31 .44) is valid for functions 1/J which are considered below ' since we shall show that the function r 1/J is representable by the fractional integral of order a.
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE Fffi.ST KIND
648 B.
The class of admissible perturbations
T.
It is natural to consider the perturbing operator T to have the kernel T(x, t) with a singularity of order weaker than 1 - a , in order that the operator K in (31.4�) should have a weak singularity. By means of the expression for fractional integration by parts we arrive at the requirement that the fractional derivative of T(x, t) with respect to t of order a
6 ,.,..( _- 1 d ex ) - ex l i' (x, t) - r ( a ) dt J T(x, s)(s - t) ds
(31.47)
t
must have a weak singularity. The following lemma presents a simple sufficient condition for the admissible kernel T(x, t). Lemma 31.3.
Let
{
(x, t)(x - t) f11 - 1 , t < x, T(x,t ) = cCt (x, 2 t)(t - x)"Ill2 - 1 , t > x,
(31.48)
where a < f3i :5 1 and Ci (x, t) are functions, bounded in [a, b] x [a, b], differentiable in respect to t as t :/; x and such that 18ci /8tl :5 Ai lx - tl - 1 , i = 1, 2. Then the kernel rf-ex > (x, t) is representable as the sum of a Volterra degenerate kernel and the kernel with a weak singularity: r}t ex) (x t) = T,0 (x t) + '
'
{ cc<�,l -ex6)) (b - X)f12- l (b - t) -ex r
0,
.
'
t > x, t < x,
(31.49) (31.50)
Proof.
Let
t < x at first. We have
In the first integral we change the variable: s = t + w(x - t) and then differentiate under the integral sign, while in the latter integral we differentiate first and then
§ 31 . EQUATIONS WITH POWER-TYPE KERNELS
change the variable:
649
s = z + w (z - t). We obtain:
1
+ (z
+
_
t).Bt - a
8c1 (z, s) ( 1 - w).Bt dw J0 8s w0
a
(z - t)l+a - ,8:�
j
(6 - t)/(� - 4) 0
c2 (z, z + w(z - t)) dw w l - .8, ( 1 + w)l+a .
The integrals in the first and in the third terms are bounded since bounded. For the second term we have
ci (z, t)
are
Let t > z. Integrating by parts in (31.47) and then differentiating under the integral sign with respect to t, we obtain
The first term here is a degenerate kernel, others admit the estimates
c -< (t - z)l+a-p, .'
650
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FffiST KIND
,
c I (s - z)c2 (z,2-,8s)ds � (s - t) a · � (t - z) l + a- ,8�
·
t
Gathering all the estimates we obtain
(31.49) and (31.50).
C. Noether theorems in the "classical" version.
Since equations (31.41) and (31.42) are reduced to the singular equations _ theory of the latter equations. The (31.43) and (31.44), we can use the Noether main work here is the proper choice of the space for the solutions cp and ,P in the situation of the "classical" approach, based on Theorem 31.6. The problem of such a choice did not arise when we considered the operator M in (31.41) as Noetherian from Lp (a, b) into Ia [Lp (a, b)] in the setting prescribed by Definition 31.3. In the theorems below, the value + v(a)e -awi O(a) = arg u(a) u(a) + v(a)eawi is chosen within the bounds
0 � 0 (a) < 211" .
Let u(z), v(z) E H >. ([a , b]), A > a, and f(z) E H� , let the kernel T(z, t) satisfy the assumptions of Lemma 31.3 and let u2 (z) + v 2 (z) =I 0, O(a) =I 0, O(a) =I (1 - a)211" , O(b) ::j; 2 11"k, k = 0, ±1, . . . . Equation (31.41) is solvable , in the space H* if and only if J/(z),P;(z)dz = 0, where {1/J; } is a complete system a of solutions of the homogeneous equation (31.42) (with g(z) = 0), which have the form (31.51) ,P(z) = (z - a) - a (b - z) -a ,P. (z) with a function ,P. (z), Holderian on [a, b]. The difference between numbers of linearly independent solutions of (31.41) and (31.42) is evaluated by (30.57). Theorem 31.11.
The proof of this theorem is actually set up by the reduction to (31.43) and (31.44), and follows as we shall show from the known facts for such equations. Let us rewrite (31.43) and the homogeneous equation corresponding (31.44) in the form , a (z) <J, (t) dt + K, <J, = j, (z), 2 a l (z) <J, (z) + 11" -t-z a
(31.52)
a2 (t) 1/J, (t) dt .!:_I t-z 11"
(31.53}
--
I
,
a l (z),P, (z) -
a
+ K 6'f/J6
= 0.
§ 31 . EQUATIONS WITH POWER-TYPE KERNELS
651
�, (z) = (b - z) -a �(z), /b (z) = (b - z) -a /(z), t!J6(z) = (b - z)0 1/J (z), K , = (b - z) - °K(b - t)0 and K& = (K, )*. Equations (31.52) and (31.53) are singular integral equations with the Noether nature presented in Theorems 31.6 and 31.7. The problem to be solved is the following. If we seek solutions
�
1/J (z) = 1/J, (z)/(b - z) 0 , 1/J, (z) E H.
(31.54)
The functions 1/J (z) may be sought, indeed, in a wider space (31.51). The simplest way to see this is the following. We might reduce (31.41) and (31.42) to the singular equations of the type (31.43) and (31.44) or (31.52) and (31.53) with the weight function (z - a)0 instead of (b - z) 0 • To obtain this we have to apply (11.17) and (11.19) instead of (11.18) and (11.16). By this method we would arrive at the equation of the type (31.52) with the right-hand side (z - a) -a / (z) and the equation of the type (31.53) with the solution 1/Ja (z) = (z - a)0 1/J (z). Arguments repeating those given above show that the choice of the class of the same solutions 1/J(z) must be the following: 1/J(z) = 1/Ja (z)/(z - a)0 with 1/Ja (z) E H. Comparing this with (31.54) we attain (31.51). Applying Theorem 31.6 to (31.52) we see that (31.43) is solvable in H* if and , only if J f(z)t!JJ(z)dz = 0, where {1/Ji } is a complete system of solutions of the
homogeneous equation corresponding to (31.44) in the space (31.51). If (31.43) is solvable in the space H* for the right-hand side / (z) E H!(C H*), then all its solutions �(z) belong to the subspace H! too. We omit the proof of this assertion, but give some elucidations. For a singular equation, as in (31.52), with the kernel K( z, t) which is Holderian in both variables, it is known that if its right-hand side has integrable singularities at the end-points of the power type with orders not exceeding a given number, and the Holder property of the kernel is of sufficiently large order, then the solution, which is a priori considered in H* , has similar singularities. It is known that this can be proved by the method of Carleman-Vekua-regularization (see Gahov [1]) which is based on the inversion
a
-
652
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
of the dominant part of the equation. After this the required information about solutions is obtained from the theory of Fredholm equations. In our case, that is under our assumptions on the kernel T(z, t), the difference is only in the fact that we arrive at the Fredholm equation with a kernel having a weak singularity (see Remark 31.3 below), and the statement is true as well. This requires detailed estimates which occupy too much space and therefore are omitted. Since (31.43) is solvable and all its solutions belong to the space n: , then {31 .41) is solvable in H* . It remains to observe that the last statement of the theorem follows from its validity for (31 .52) and (31.53). • Remark 31.2. The choice (31.51) is that of the space, "adjoint" to the space H* for solutions of (31.41) and (31.42). This choice of adjoint spaces of (weighted) Holderian functions for (31.41) which is an equation of the first kind enables us to obtain the statement of the Noether theorems-type, i.e. Theorem 31.1 1 . We would like t o stress, that the main idea underlying the choice of the adjoint
spaces proves to be the requirement that
6
J(z - a) a (b - z)a lcp(z),P(z)lds < oo. a
As
regards the theory of singular equations, the rule for the choice of adjoint spaces is
6
J lcp(z),P(z)l dz < oo . a
Remark 31.3. One can investigate the regularizer (interpreted in the sense of
Theorem 31.4), construct it explicitly and show that the kernel of the regularized equation, i.e. the Fredholm-type equation of the second kind, has a weak singularity. Namely, if u(z), v(z) E H >.. , � > a, and the kernel T(z, t) satisfies the assumptions of Lemma 31 .3, then the kernel of the regularized equation is dominated by lz - tl" - 1 with I' = min(� , Pt , P2 ) - a. D . The N oether nature of potential type operators from
Ia (Lp) ·
Lp
into
Let us consider the equation of type (31.41) in the form
j u(z, t)cp(t)dt + j6 v(z, t)cp(t)dt /( M
=
a
(z - t) l - a
(t - z) - a
_
(31.55)
We suppose that the functions u(z, t) and v(z, t) satisfy the assumptions 1) they are Holderian of order � > a in z uniformly in t: (31 .56) where on t;
Zt � t, z2 � t and Zt � t, z2 � t, respectively, and A and A do not depend
§ 31 . EQUATIONS WITH POWER-TYPE KERNELS
653
2 ) u(z, z) = u(z, z - 0) E C([a, 6]), v (z, z) = v(z, z + 0) E C([a, b]). Following the same lines as in §31.1 ( see (31.9)-(31.12)) an d applying (11.16), we reduce (31.55) to the form (31.57) where
(31.58) tJ
and a 1 (z) = u(z, z) + v(z, z) cos a1r,
a 2 (z) = v(z, z) sin a1r, and
�
y) T1 cp = j u(z,(zy)- -y)u(y, 1 - o cp(Y)dy,
(31.59)
tJ
1!
6
v(z, y) - v(y, y) 2 cp = j (y - Z ) 1 - o cp( Y)dy.
(31.60)
z
We shall prove that the operators T1 · and T2 are completely continuous from Lp into l0 (L,), 1 < p < 1/a. Firstly we show that the operators of the form (31.55) are bounded from L, into l0 (L,). We denote �
M1 cp = f tJ
u(z,t) cp(t)dt, (z t) 1 _ 0 _
6 f M2 cp = (t v(z,t)1 _ _
�
z) 0 cp(t)dt.
Let -oo < a < b < oo, 0 < < 1 , 1 5 p < oo. The operutor M1 with the function u(z, t) satis!Jing the assumptions 1} and e) is bounded from L,(a, b) into I:+ [L,(a, b)]. If u(z, z) #; 0, a 5 z 5 6, then Mt [L,(a , b)) = I:+ [L,(a, b)].
Lemma 31.4.
a
Proof. Let p > 1 . We have
MlC/) - j u(t, t)cp(t)o :e
tJ
(z - t) l -
clt
+ TilCfJ
654
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
T1 is the operator (31.59). Let us show that T1 is bounded from Lp (a, b) into I:+ [Lp(a, b)]. First of all, using Theorem 13.3, we shall prove that T1 (Lp) C I:+ [Lp(a, b)]. In accordance with this theorem let
where
..7.
z-c f(z) - f(t) dt , ) 'l"c ( z - j 1+a (z - t)
- oo
where f(t) = (T1
< b,
a < z < b,
and it is assumed that
as
s < a.
z-c
z -e s) - u(t, s) dt ) j ( 1/Jc ( z) =
a
•
z c•
f f + r (o:) k (s)ds oo
u(z , t) - u(t, t)
0
(31.61)
where k(s) is the function (6.10) . Hence elementary manipulations which are left to the reader, give the uniform estimate ll .,j;c liP � c with c not depending on £ . So T1
(z) = naa+ T1
By (31.61) and (6.11) we arrive at
V1
z
z
f(l a:
a:
f u(z, s) - u(t, s) ) f
(31 .62)
•
The kernel of this integral operator is dominated by const ( z - s )�- 1 in view of (31.56) and so the operator V1 is bounded in Lp. This is equivalent to boundedness of the operator T1 from Lp into 1!\[Lp (a, b)]. Further, we have M1
§ 31 . EQUATIONS WITH POWER-TYPE KERNELS
655
Corollary 1. Let u(z, t) and v(z, t) satisfy assumptions 1) and 2). The operators M1 and M2 are bounded from Lp(a, b) into pr[Lp(a, b)], -oo < a < b < oo , 0 < < 1, 1 < p < 1/o:. Indeed, by symmetry we state that the assertion of Lemma 31.4 holds for the operator M2 as an operator from Lp(a, b) into If_ [Lp(a, b)]. It remains then to recall the coincidence of the ranges: I�\[Lp( a, b)] = If_ [Lp (a, b)] in the case 1 < p < 1/o:. Q
Corollary 2. Let u(z, t) and v(z, t) satisfy assumption 1). The operators T1 and T2 are completely continuous from Lp (a, b) into Ia [Lp(a, b)], - oo < a < b < oo , 0 < < 1, 1 < p < 1/o:. Indeed, as in Corollary 1 it is sufficient to consider the operator T1 only. Its complete continuity from Lp into Ia (Lp) is equivalent to that of (31.62) in the space Lp (a, b). As it was observed in the proof of Lemma 31.4, the kernel of the operator V1 is dominated by the kernel (z - s)�- l with a weak singularity. Then the operator V1 is completely continuous in Lp see for example Krasnosel 'skii, Zabreiko, Pustyl'nik and Sobolevskii [1, p. 97]). We are ready now to give the result on the Noether nature of the operator M in (31.55) in the following theorem in which 0:
-
G( z )
u(z, z) v(z, z)e ia - u(z, z)++ v(z, z)e-ia •• eil(z) · _
_
-
Theorem 31.12. Let the functions u(z, t) and v ( z, t) satisfy assumptions 1) and 2). Then the operator M in (31.55) is Noetherian from the space Lp, 1 < p < 1/o:,
into the space Ia (Lp) if and only if
z :5 b; 211' (mod 211'). ii) O(a) ":f 211' 1 -pap (mod 211'), O(b) -:f ""# a :5
(31.63) (31.64)
These conditions being satisfied, the index of the operator M is given by (31.65) Proof.
Representation (31.57) and Theorems 31.2 and 31.3 show that the property of the operator M to be Noetherian from Lp into Ia ( Lp) is equivalent to that of
656
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE Fffi.ST KIND
Lp into Lp .
the operator N01 from operator
The latter is equivalent to the property of the b
a2 (y) ,P(y)dy a1 (z),P(z) + .!.j 1r y-z
(31.66)
a
to be Noetherian in the space Lp(p) with the weight p(z) = (z - a) -ap . The singular operator and the operator of multiplication by a continuous function are permutable up to an operator completely continuous in the space Lp (p) see Gohberg and Krupnik [3], [4], so the criterion for (31.66) to be Noetherian is contained in Theorem 31.12.
....
Remark 31.4. Theorem 31.12 may be extended to the case of the space Lp(p) with the weight p( z ) = (z - a)�'(b - z) " , -1 < p < p - 1, -1 < v < p - 1. In correspondence with Theorem 31.7 the conditions in (31.64) are to be replaced by the conditions �(a) :f. 21r 1t" - a and O(b) =/:= -21r 7 ( mod 2 1r ), the conditions in (31.65) requiring similar changes. The literary citations in §34.1 should also be referred to.
(
)
Remark 31.5. A theorem about the Noether nature - in the sense of Definition
31.3 - of the operator M holds in the case of the spaces H6(p) similarly to Theorem 31.12. 1/p < a < 1 the statement of a type such as Theorem 31.12 holds. This gives the Noether nature of the operator M from Lp into a special space ( see §34.2, note 31.1). E. The case v(z, t) = 0. We now specially consider an important. particular case of (31.55), namely Remark 31.6. In the case
z
u(z,tl)
J (z a
_
t) -a cp(t)dt = /(z),
0
< a < 1.
(31.67)
It is reducible to a Volterr� integral equation of the second kind if u(z, z) =/:= 0. Indeed (31.57) takes the form f(a)I:+ [u(t, t) cp(t)] + T1 cp = f . Inverting here the fractional operator 1:+ , we arrive at the equation·
u(z, z)cp(z) + . - K (x, s) cp(s)ds = n :+ /, Slll Q1r Q1r
X
J a
(31. 68)
§ 31. EQUATIONS WITH POWER-TYPE KERNELS
657
where
K, (z ' s)
z:
=
u(z, s) - u(t, s)
J {t - s) 1- a (z - t ) 1+a dt 1 1 _ u(z, s) - u(s + e(z - s), s) ds. =_ z-sJ e 1 -a (1 - e) l+a Here I K-(z, s) l � c(z - s) - 1 if u(z, s) satisfies {31.56). •
0
according to {31.62). 'Thereby, in view of Lemma 31.4 the following result is proved.
Let u(z, t) satisfy {31.56) and let u{z, z) 6e continuous on (a, b] � z � b. For every /{z) e i:+ (Lp), p 2:: 1, {31.67) is equivalent to the following Volterra equation of the second kind:
Theorem 31.13. and u (z, z) I 0, a
z:
( 3 1 .69)
(J
where g ( z) = u(;,z) ( D�+ /){z) and the kernel A(z, s) = ai::�u :,z has a weak singularity. Therefore, {31.67) is unconditionally and uniquely solvable in Lp( a, b) for any /(z) E I:+(Lp) · The case a 2:: 1 may be similarly considered, provided that u(z, t) is differentiable up to order (a] and (olal u(z, t ) ) /oz [a] satisfies (31.56) and the requirement of continuity at t z. z
=
31 .4. On the stability of solutions Solutions of integral equations of the first kind are not stable in general and the problem of inversion of such equations is known as an ill-posed problem. The simplest equation of the first kind - the Abel equation: z:
is not stable __. n- 0
<J'n (2
•
{ 31.70)
4
for example in the 'space C((a, b]). In fact let us choose / (z) = = [(z a)/(b - a))" so that -+ 0 as n -+ oo. The solution by of {31.70) IS equal to ( z) = 6-a (z) = . . . + a There IS no , 26) S0 II II C = <• r < t > -+ <"-tr lD VIeW 0f (1 66) •
-a 1 / nl l c n . <J'n r(1a{D(Ja+ /n r n <J'n narr(-a r(n+1- a) r a
n rxn+l)- o) . ( 1:-(J ) n- a nar<•-�� r(arf(n+l •
.
•
658
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
stability in the case of the space Lp(a, b), 1 � p � oo also, which can be justified by the same example modified in the following way, namely
(31.71) Then
(31.72) as n --+- oo. The instability of solution of the equations of the first kind is a reflection of the simple fact that the operator generated by the left-hand side of the equation, maps the considered space of solutions onto its proper subspace, the space itself being essentially wider than this subspace. Therefore the inverse operator is not bounded. This means that for equations of the first kind it is natural to estimate the proximity of solutions and that of the right-hand sides in different metrics. Namely, the proximity of right-hand sides is to be considered in a stronger metric, so that when dealing for example with (31.70) in a certain space X we have to take another space Y for the right-hand sides providing the boundedness of the inverse operator from Y into X. Such an approach can naturally give stability of the solutions. The spaces X = Lp and Y = L 9 are not suited for this goal whatever p E (1, oo] and q E (1, oo] were, since the inverse operator is never bounded from L 9 into Lp . We can achieve stability by taking Y = I:+ (X) , i.e. requiring that the class of right-hand sides consisted of functions representable by the fractional integral of a function in the given space. (Compare this with similar arguments in connection with the normal solvability of integral equations of the first kind in the end of §31.1.) In other words, it is natural to define stability for example for (31.67) in such a way that not the condition 11 /l lx --+- 0, but uv:+ fllx --+- 0 would imply llcpllx --+- 0. This means that under such a definition of the stability we are interested in the a priori estimate
(31.73) Of course, the idea formulated above is trivial for the simplest equation such as (31.70), but it proves to be substantial and useful in a more general situation of (31.67) and of (31.55) or (31.41) all the more so. This idea is effective under the choice, for example, of X = Lp or X = H:>t. , X = H:>t.(p) , since the spaces 1:+ (X) are well studied and characterized in the case of such X - see §13. We recall also that the space I:+ (Lp ) was shown to be coincident with the Sobolev-type space n a ,p - see § 18.4. We confine ourselves to the illustration of the afore mentioned idea by the example of (31.67).
§ 32. EQUATIONS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
659
Let u(z, t) satisfy the assumptions of Theorem 31.13. The solution of (31.67) exists, is unique in any of the spaces Lp (a, b) , 1 � p < oo, and admits the estimate (31.74) whatever the right-hand side f was, the constant c depending only on a and the kernel function u(z, t).
Theorem 31.14.
Proof. By Theorem 31.13 it is sufficient to prove the estimate ll
where wp (/, t) = ll f(z + t) - /(z)llp · Here, evidently, a simple estimate ll
equations. We do not elaborate on these considerations. We also do not concern ourselves here with the problems connected with the regularization in the sense of Tihonov of the ill-posed problem of solving the integral equation of the first kind. There are many investigations devoted to this goal. We refer, for example, to the paper by Zheludev (1], directly concerning the Abel equation (see also (2]), where numerical methods of solutions were suggested based on the method of Tihonov 's regularization. The papers by Gerlach and Wolfersdorf (1], Hai and Ang [1], Gorenflo (6] and Ang, Gorenflo and Hai (1] are also relevant. We also note the paper by Savelova (1] which deals with some questions of stability of fractional differentiation, including the multi-dimensional case.
§ 32. Equations with Power-Logarithmic Kernels The present section deals with the solution of integral equations of the first kind with power-logarithmic kernels and a variable limit of integration
660
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS
rta) f z
a
( Z' - t)( Z' - t)"' - ' Jn�
c
a
Z'
OF
T HE
FffiST
KIND
� t 'P (t)dt = f(z ) ,
(32.1)
b,
where [a, b] is a finite interval of the real axis , a 0, -oo < {J < oo, 1 > particular, the inversion formula for convolution operators of the form
>
b - a�
In
z
(I':f'P)( z) =
r(�) f( z - t)"'-' m� � t 'P(t)dt = /(z) , Z'
a
(32.2)
a < z < b,
is given. The solution of the latter equation unlike the · case {J = 0 considered in § 2 requires the application of special functions of the Volterra type. This is necessary for the following reason. In the case of a natural power of a logarithm ({J = m = 1 , 2, . . . ) the function za - 1 lnm z ( which is naturally considered instead of z a - 1 lnm ( 1I z)) is obtained by ordinary differentiation of a power function za - 1 with respect to a m times: z a - 1 lnm z = c:rn za - 1 1dam . Therefore it is natural to expect that the power-logarithmic function z a - 1 ln� (11z ) with an arbitrary real exponent {J can be obtained by fractional differentiation (1I z ) a - 1 with · respect However after doing this we obtain instead of the function za - l ln� (1 /z ) to itself a certain special function known as a Volterra function, whose main term of asymptotic expansion is equal to za - qn� ( 1/z) - see (31 . 1 1) and (32.37) below. For this reason we first give · some properties of the special Volterra functions and prove some identities for them. We then solve in closed form the integral equations of the form
a.
(32.3)
a < z < b,
a > 0,
with constant coefficients Am k and integer nonnegative powers of logarithms. In conclusion we obtain the criterion for solvability of (32.1) and , in particular, of (3;2.2). We note that unlike {32.3) the unknown . function
§ 32. EQUATIONS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
661
32. 1 . Special Volterra functions and some of their properties We consider the function
{32.4) called the Volterra function as given by Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi [3, 18.3] and M.M. Dzherbashyan [2, Ch. 5, § 11, p. 261]. We recall some its properties. The function p( z , u, a ) is defined for Re u > -1 and is an analytic function of z with branch points z = 0 and z = oo and has no other singularities. It is an entire function with respect to a. It can be extended to an entire function with respect to u by the relation
(32 .5 ) Reu > - n -
1,
and hence, in particular,
n = 1, 2, . . .
{32.6)
From {32.4) the differentiation formula
tF
dzn p( z , u, a ) = p( z , u, a - n)
{32.7)
follows. The asymptotic expansion of the Volterra function at zero is given by the relation
)
- 0' - 1 1 p(z , IT, <> ) = z " In ;
(
N[ ];.-1 {-1)"{; 1) ( ( �n �rN) ]. +
n
p(l, -n - l , a)
(
1 In
;
)
-n
+0
Re o: > -1,
l (;) I arg ln
<11" ,
z --+ 0,
{32.8)
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
662
where ( u + 1)n is the Pochhammer symbol given in (1.45). In Lemma 32.1 below we prove two integral identities which are used in the sequel. They involve certain special functions. We denote for simplicity
(l�g)(o:) =
{ (l�g)(o:),g)(o:) ev: fl
if p > if p <
0, 0,
(32.9)
where l�g and v: fl g are the right-sided fractional integral (5.3) and fractional derivative (5.8) considered on the half-axis (0, +oo). We denote by l�[g( z)](t) an application of the operator I� to a function g( x) with respect to at the point t. We introduce the functions
T, T
T,
v(z) = p(x, 0, 0), vh (z) = (d/dx)v(xe h ), 1 z T - l (t), -00 < p < oo, l't ,p (x) = I� f(T) :y
[ () ]
(32.10) (32.11)
and we shall call these Volterra functions also. The following lemma is true.
The following integral identities
Lemma 32. 1.
J ta- l [ln t + h - .,P(o:)]vh(X - t)dt = -za- l , �
o: > 0,
(32.12)
0
J l'a ,p (t)l' l -a, -f3(X - t)dt = �
"'(
, 0<
0:
<
1,
-00 < /3 <
oo,
(32.13)
0
are valid for the Volterra functions (32.10) and (32.11). Proof.
Let
h E R1 . We consider the relation 0:
>
0,
0'
>
0, (32.14)
which is directly checked by (1.68) and (1.69). We first apply the integration operator J! with respect to u to (32.14) and then the differentiation operator 1; 1
§ 32. EQUATIONS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
with respect to
a.
663
Then in view of Stirling's formula {1.63} we obtain the relation
t a- 1 e h a ln t + h - f'{a) dt f (z - ty - 1 e h (T - 1 ) dr f r(a) [ r(a) ] z
00
0
0
Setting here u =
r(r)
1 and using (1.67), (32.4} and (32.6), we have
z
j ta- 1 �nt + h - 1/l(a)]v((z - t)eh )dt = za /a,
(32.15)
a > 0.
0
Differentiating this result with respect to z and applying (32.7) and the estimate v(z) = O(ln(1/z) - 1 ) as z -+ +0, following from (32.8), we derive as a result the first identity (32.12) in view of (32.10). Let now -oo < {J < oo. Similarly to the previous case {J = 1, where ordinary operators · of the integration and differentiation of the integer order were applied to (32.14), we transform this relation first applying the operator I� with respect to a to (32.14) and then the operator J;P with respect to u see (32.9). Setting u = 1 - a (0 < a < 1) and h = - In -y, "Y > b - a, in the relation thus obtained and taking (32.11) into account we obtain another identity {32.13). The lemma is proved. • -
Remark 32.1. By
(32.8)
the function defined by
(32.11)
has the asymptotic
behavior
( ) In- 1 ;"Y + (In ;"Y ) ] ,
z a- 1 (In "Y ) - P 1 + {J d 1 P a ,p (z) = :y ; r(a) da r(a) z -+ +0,
()
[
0
-2
(32.16)
at zero. Therefore (32.13) can be continuously extended to the cases a = 0, {J > 0 and a = 1, {J < 0. If we set a = 1, {J = 1 in (32.16), then according to (32.7) it is not difficult to obtain the following asymptotic result at zero:
(32.17) for the function
vh (z) defined by (32.10).
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
664
32.2. The solution of equations with integer non-negative powers of logarithms First we consider the simplest equation of the form
(32.3) in the case m = 1:
f(�) J(z - t)"- 1 [ln(z - t) + A)10(t)dt = /(z), :r:
a>
0.
(32.18)
(I
Without loss of generality we suppose that operator
A 11 = 1
and
A1 0 = A.
We apply the
( J!+ g)(x) = J vh (x - t)g(t)dt :r:
(32.19)
where Vh has the form (32.10) to both sides of this equation and set h - .,P(o:) = A. Then from (32.12) it follows that (32.18) is solvable together with the equation
t
ra
) J (z - t)" - 1 \0(t)dt = - J vh (z - t)f(t). :r:
:r:
(32.20)
According to § 2, the unique solution of the latter equation, and therefore of (32.18) is given by the formula
(32.21) where 1)�+ is the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative given in Now we consider (32.3) with m = 2:
t
r a)
:r:
j(z - t)"- 1 [In2 (z - t) (I
+ A2 1 In ( z - t) + A 20)10( t)dt = !( z),
(2.30). a>
0. (32.22)
Again without loss of generality we suppose that A22 = 1. Setting h = h 2 in (32.12) and differentiating it with respect to o: arid adding (32.12) multiplied by h1 - .,P( o:) to · the relation thus obtained we find
J ta- 1 {ln2 t + [h2 + ht - 2.,P(o:)) In t :r:
0
=
+
[h2 - .,P (o:)][h t . - .,P(o:)] - .,P'(o:)}vh � (x - t)dt
-za- t �n z + ht - .,P(a)), o: > 0.
(32.23)
§ 32. EQUATIONS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
665
Let us suppose now that the constants ht and h 2 are connected with the constants A2 o and A 2 1 by the relations (32.24) and J!+ and J!f. are the operators (32. 19) with h = h 1 and h = h2 respectively. Applying first the operator J!f. and then the operator J!+ to the both sides of (32.22) and taking (32.23) and (32.24) into account we find
r(�) j �
tl
( :e - w - ' �(t)dt = ( - 1) 2 ( J!V!U (t ) )( z ) .
(32.25)
Hence it follows that (32.22) is solvable together with the latter equation and its unique solution has the form (32.26) Analyzing the solution of (32.18) and (32.22) we see that the relations in (32. 12) and (32.23) played the main. role in constructing the solutions given in (32.21) and (32.26) respectively. Similarly, for solving (32.3) with an arbitrary m the leading role is to be played by the identity which generalizes (32.12) and (32.23) and is given by the following statement.
Let m = 1, 2, . . . and the constants Am; = Am; (m, a) be defined by the recuJTent relati.ons
Lemma 32.2.
Amm (m, a) = 1 ,
m ;::: 1;
Ato(l, a) = h t - tP(a), . . . , Ato (m, a ) = hm - tjJ (a);
Am ,m -t ( m, a) = Am - l ,m� 2 ( m, a) + At,o(1, a), Am; (m, a) = A m - t ,; (m, a)Ato( 1 , a) + j=
m ;::: 2;
.
. d Am - tJ (m, a) + Am - l ,j - t (m, a), da
l, . . . , m - 2, if m ;::: 3;
Am o (m, a) = Am - t,o(m, a)Ato(1, a) +
(32.27)
d A t,o(m, a) , da m -
m ;::: 2.
666
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
Then the identity
j a:
ta- l
O
m
m- 1
J =O
J =O
?: Amj (m, a) lnj t Vh ,. (z - t)dt = -z a- l ?: Am - l ,j (m - 1, a) lnj z
is valid.
(32.28)
If m = 1 , then in view of (32.27) we have Au ( 1 , a) = 1 , A1o(1 , a) = h1 - .,P(a). If m = 2, then A22(2, a) = 1, A21(2, a) and A2o(2, a) are given by (32.24). Therefore (32.28) coincides with (32.12) for m = 1 and with (32.23) for m = 2. Changing h1 to h2 and h2 to ha in (32.23), differentiating this relation with respect to a and summing it with (32.23) itself (with h1 = h2 and h2 = h3) multiplied by A10(1, a) = h1 - .,P(a), we obtain (32.28) with m = 3. Continuing
Proof.
this process and using the method of mathematical induction we prove that (32.28) is valid for an arbitrary natural m, and this completes the proof. • Let now the constants h1 , . . . , hm be connected with the constants Am,m- 1 , . . . , Amo(Amm = 1) by means of (32.27) and let J!.f. , . . . , J!+ be the operators given in (32.19) with h = h1 , . . . , hm respectively. Applying the operators J!.f. , . . . , J!+ successively to both sides of (32.3), using Lemma 32.2 and the assertions of § 2 we obtain the following theorem.
Let the constants h1 , . . . , hm be connected with the constants Amm = 1 , Am,m - 1 , . . . , Amo by (32.27) and let J!.f. , . . . , J!+ be the operators given in (32.19). Then (32.3) is solvable together with the equation
Theorem 32.1.
(32.29) and its unique solution has the form (32.30) where I:+ is the fractional integral (2.17) and v:+ is the fractional derivative (2.30). In particular, if a = 1, then the unique solution of (32.3) with the pure logarithmic kernel has the form (32.31)
§ 32. EQUATIONS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
667
Now we investigate (32.27) which reflects connections between the constants Amm , Am,m - 1 , . . . , Amo involved in (32.3) and the constants h t , . . . , hm contained in its solution (32.30). If m = 2, then (32.27) coincides with (32.24) which by the Vieta theorem is the same as the numbers h t - tjl(a) and h2 - 1/J (a) which are roots of the quadratic equation
(32.32) If m = 3, then (32.27) has the form Ass(3, a) = 1, As2 (3, a) = h t + h2 + hs - 31/J (a), Ast (3, a) == [h t - ,P(a)][h2 - 1/J (a)] + [h t - 1/J (a)][hs - 1/J (a)] + [h 2 - 1/J(a)][hs - 1/J (a)] - 3 1/J '(a), Aso(3, a) = [h t - ,P(a)][h2 - 1/J (a)][hs - 1/J (a)] - As, 2 (3, a) ,P'(a) - 1/J "(a). By the Vieta theorem this is equivalent to the fact that the numbers h2 - ,P( a) and hs - ,P( a) are roots of the cubic equation
h t - 1/J (a), (32.33)
Similarly, in the general case of an arbitrary natural m the numbers h 1 ,P (a), . . . , hm - ,P (a) are roots of a certain algebraic equation of power m, namely
(32.34) with the coefficients am - b . . . , a 1 , ao expressed via the constants A m,m - t , . . . , Am o (Amm = 1) involved in (32.2), for example, am - 1 = Am,m- 1 , etc.
32.3. The solution of equations with real powers of logarithms We pass on to solving statement. Lemma 32.3.
(32.1).
We note at once that
(32.13) leadsto the following
The solvability of the equation
J JJa,p (z - �)
a
(32.35)
CHAPTER 6.
668
INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
in L(a, b) is equivalent to that of the equation
J
(I
·� J 1'1 -a,-p (z - t)f(t)dt z;
(I
(32.36 )
in L(a, b) where J'a ,p (z) and 1' 1 - a, - p (z) are the functions (32.11). We introduce the notation
and observe that function (32.11):
a>
0, -oo < {3 < oo,
a=
0, 0 < {3 < oo,
(32.37)
Ua ,p (z) is the main term of asymptotic expansion of the Volterra J'a ,p (z) = Ua ,p (z)[l + 0 ( 1 ))
z -. +0.
as
In the following the ensuing lemma plays a fundamental role. Lemma 32.4.
relations
Let c(z) be an absolutely continuous function on (O, b - a) and the
c(z)u a ,p (z) - co . z ( ) co = z:lim c(z), = r o l'a ,{J ( ) be valid. Then for any function r.p(z) E L(a, b) the relation Z
(32.38)
J c(z - t)ua,p (z - t)
z;
0
(I
t
+ J J'a,p (z - t ) dt J t/J (t - r) r.p(r)dr z;
(32.39)
(I
(I
is true where ,P (z) =
- � J r'(y)dy J J'a,p (t) !1'1 -a,-p (z - t)dt y
z;
0
0
E L( O, b - a) .
(32.40 )
669
§ 32. EQUATIONS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
,P(x)
Proof. First we show that E L(O, b - a). Let a > entire part of {3. In view of (32.16) we have
0, {3 > 0 and [,8] be the
b-a b-a 11 dt b- aln-� l. ln� J 11/J(x) l dx :=;c J l r'(y) l dy J t 1 _0 J11 (x � t) l+:-t dx b-a 11 dt b-a t =c t 1 - a J11 [ln Z - t + ln rt ] �] J l r'(y) ldy f _ R
0
0
R
J_
0
__
0
0
Applying the binomial formula and carrying out the change
b-a ] � j lf/>(z) jdz $c L (� ) j lr'(y) jdy j t'(!_a
b-a
1
•=0
0
x = t r we obtain
7J
0
0
b- a 11 dt (b- • l ln &.r- 1.81+1 + l in &. I dr ( ) j lr'(y) ldy j t 11j/ (r - 1 ) 1 + o t b- a (b-a)/11 oo b a ] � $ c 0 (�) j l r' ( y) j dy ( j ln r + j In � ) 1 (b- a)/11 l ln T -1 1 �P-�]+i + lin T -1 1 li dr l)l +o
LB1 i
• -0
X
:=;c
•lt
0
'
0
0
_
_
(r -
��] ( ) �b-al r'(y) ldy Joo (I T: 1 I{J-�]+i l)l+I o T:1 li) 1 i
In
LB1
•=0
0
+ In
(r
_
< + oo, The cases a =
0, {3 > 0 and a > 0, {3 < 0 are considered similarly.
In
T
dr
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
670
We use Lemma 32.2 now. Setting
/(z)
:1:
=
taking (32.38) into account we have
� J#Jl- a,-p (z - t)f(t)dt
f c(z - t)ua,p (z - t)
:1:
a
� J #Jl - a,-p (z - t)dt J[coiJa,p (t - r) + r(t - T)Pa,p (t - r)]
:1:
=
a
a
t J co J
:1:
=
a
a
(32.41)
a
One may check directly that
� J Pl-a,-p (z - t)dt J r(t - T)IJa,p (t - r)
:1:
a
a
J dt J .,P(t - r)
:1:
=
a
a
Then from (32.41) it follows that
� J #Jl-a,-p (z - t)f(t)dt co J
:1:
t
:1:
=
a
a
a
a
But according to Lemma 32.3 the relation
J
J t
:1:
/(z) = Pa ,p (z - t)[co
a
is valid. Hence (32.39) follows. The lemma is thus proved. Further we consider the operator
J
•
:1:
(T.p
(32.42)
§ 32. EQUATIONS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
671
It is completely continuous in Lp(a, b), 1 :::; p :::; oo, and has zero spectral radius, Zabreiko [1). Therefore the operator coE + T.p is invertible in Lp {a, b) and the following statement giving the criterion of solvability of {32.1) in Lp (a, b) follows from Lemma 32.4.
Let a function c(z), c(O) #; 0, satisfy conditions of Lemma 32.4 and let u a ,� (z) have the form {32.37). The equation
Theorem 32.2.
j c(z - t)ua,� (z - t)cp(t)dt = /{z) :1:
{32.43)
(I
is solvable in Lp (a, b), 1 :5 p :5 oo if and only if the free term /{z) is representable in the form
f :1:
/{z) = JJa ,�(z - t)x(t)dt, x(t) E Lp{a, b).
{32.44)
(I
This condition being satisfied the equation has the unique solution given by the expression
d� ( � i Pt -a , - p (z - t)f(t)dt)
{32.45)
where (c0 E + T.p) - 1 is the operator inverse to the operator :1:
(coE + T.p) cp(z) = co cp(z) + j ,P(z - t) cp(t)dt
{32.46)
(I
and the function ,P(z) is defined by {32.40), {32.11) and {32.38). Corollary. Equation {32.2) is solvable in Lp (a, b), 1 :5 p :5 oo, if and only if the free term f(x) is representable in the form {32.44). This condition being satisfied the equation has the unique solution cp given by the expression {32.47) A characterization of the space of the right-hand side f of {32.43) via a convolution with the Volterra function � 1' 1 - a , - � is contained in Lemma 32.3 which is a generalization of Theorem 2.1 for equations of the form {32.44).
672
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
Remark 32.2. It is easily shown that the relation r:f cp = c,
cp E Lp , is impossible in general if c #; 0 in the case p � 1/a, 0 < a � 1. Namely, if p < 1/a, fJ E R1 or p = 1/a, fJ � -1 + a then cp = c = 0.
§ 33. The Noether Nature of Equations of the First Kind with Power-Logarithmic Kernels The present section deals with the investigation of the Noether nature of integral equations of the first kind with power-logarithmic kernels ,
f Kcp = _
a
c(x, t) fJ -y _ lx - ti l -a In lx - t ! cp(t)dt - f(x), a < x < b,
(33.1 )
where [a , b] is a finite interval of the real axis, -oo < fJ < oo, 0 � a < 1 ({J < - 1 if a = 0) , -y > b - a , and the function c(x, t) has a jump of the first kind at the diagonal x = t:
{
c(x, t) = u(x, t), t < x, (33.2) v(x, t), t > x. Equation (31.1) considered in § 31 is a particular case of (33.1 ) for 0 < a < 1, fJ = 0. We shall study the Noether nature of the operator K in the corresponding proper setting, namely from the space Lp = Lp( a , b), 1 < p < oo, into a special Banach space X. We shall show that the appearance of the factor lnfJ l:r:! tl weakening or strengthening a singularity of the kernels at the diagonal x = t (depending on the sign of {J) and in the kernel of the potential type operator (33.1) changes only the range of the operator K. As for the Noether nature of (33.1), it remains the same in the sense that the Noether properties of K from Lp into X
are equivalent to that of a certain singular integral operator in Lp which does not depend on fJ. The scheme of investigation of the Noether properties of (33.1) is the same as for (31.1) with power kernels in § 31. We note only that the presence of the logarithmic factor with power unity considerably complicates the proof of the imbedding theorems for the ranges of the operators and I�! , with power-logarithmic kernels (see (21.1)) playing an important role, and the identities giving a connection between these operators with singular integral operators. To derive the former we use properties of the Volterra function (32.1 1) obtained in § 32, and to obtain the latter we use the method of differentiation of arbitrary order with respect to a parameter in the relation connecting fractional integrals with singular operator. The results obtained are used in the investigation of the property of the operator (33.1) as to whether it is Noetherian.
1:/
§ 33. EQUATIONS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
673
33. 1 . Imbedding theorems for the ranges of the operators P;f a ,fJ and lbLet 0 5 a <
1, -oo < {J < oo. We recall the notations: z
1 f InfJ ..:L. z- t - f(et) ( z - t) l- a
Jaa ,{J
(J
a ,
a
b
InfJ ..:L.
(33.3)
1 f t -z f(et) z (t - z) l- a
= 0, 0 < a < 1, we shall use the symbols 1:+
(33.4) (33.5) We obtain the imbedding theorems for such spaces as a corollary of a more general assertion. We introduce the Banach space
I!+ (L,) =
{1 :
j g(z z
/( z ) =
a
t)
g(x) E L(O, b - a), more general than result of § 32.
(33.4)
and
(33.5).
1 5 p 5 oo.
11 / llr!+ (L.l = llv>IIL.
}•
(33.6)
The following theorem is derived from the
Let JJa ,fJ (x) be the Volterra function (32.11) and ua ,p(x) be its main part (32.37) near the origin and c(x) be an absolutely continuous function on (0, b - a] and c0 = z-o lim c( z ) . Then the following statements are true: 1) If c0 :/; 0, then (33.7)
Theorem 33.1.
674
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
2) If co = 0, then the imbedding
(33.8) is valid and the operator of this imbedding is completely continuous. Proof. The assertions of theorem follow from Lemma 32.4 of the previous section: the former in view of the boundedness of (32.46) in Lp(a, b) and the latter in view of the complete continuity of the Volterra operator (32.46) in Lp(a, b). • Corollary.
Let
.1 � p < oo, o � a < 1, o < 6 < a
if a > o, -oo < Pt < fJ2 < oo.
Then the imbedding (33.9) (33.10) are valid and the operators of these imbeddings are completeiy continuous. 33.2. Connection between the operators with power-logarithmic kernels and the singular operator Earlier in § 11, the relations in (11.16) and (11.17) connecting the Riemann Liouville fractional integration operators I:+ and Ib'_ with the singular operator were found. They played an important role in the investigation of the Noether nature of the potential type operators (31.55) with the power-type kernel on a finite interval [a, b]. It is natural to expect that a connection between the operators I:f and I:! with power-logarithmic kernels and the singular operator are to play similar role for the potential type operators (33.1) with the power-logarithmic kernel. Proceeding from (11.16) and (11.17) we shall find such connections by applying the method of differentiation of an arbitrary order with respect to the parameter a to these equations. It will allow as to pick out a natural power of logarithm under differentiation of an integer order, while a modification of this method will help to cover the case of an arbitrary order.
S
S
§ 33. EQUATIONS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
675
We introduce singular integrals with power-logarithmic kernels
( a)
a ln m t- a � a t - x- cp(t ) dt,
_
a lnm .!=!. � a cp t dt, b_; ( )
1 j" t - a
(Sa1a1m ct')( x) = 1r
__
x
a
b
1f
(Sb1a1mct')(x) = ;
Lemma 33. 1. If m = 0,
a
-
( bb - t ) X
(33.11)
1, 2, . . . and
1 < p < oo, -1 + 1/p < Q < 1/p,
(33.12)
then the operators Sa1a1m and S,1a1m are bounded in the space Lp(a, b) . Proof. The assertion of the lemma follows from Theorem Theorem
1.5
if m =
1, 2, .
.
..
11.3 if m = 0 and from
Remark 33.1. It is known that the conditions given by (33.12) are not only sufficient but also necessary for boundedness of the operators Sa1a and S6 1a in the space Lp(a, b), Gohberg and Krupnik [5]. Remark 33.2. Let li Sa a m il = max liSa a m ilL be the norm of the operator p I I I I II'PII L , = l Sa 1 a1m . Then Theorem 1.5 yields the estimate m < .!:. f ta- 1/p l tln_ 1t l dt , li Sa1a1m II _ 1 I 00
1r
m=
1, 2, . . .
(33.13)
0
The similar estimate for the operator S6 1a1m is also valid. We rewrite (11.16) and (11.17) in the form
(33.14) (33.15)
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
676
interpreting them in the limiting ease a = 0 as tp = tp . Similar identities are also true for the operators r:f and I�! with power-logarithmic kernels. Namely, the following theorem holds. Theorem 33.2.
the relations
Let tp E Lp( a , b), 1 < p < oo, 0 � a < 1/p, -oo < {J < oo. Then I�! cp = r:f [cos( ar)cp + sin( ar) Sa 1a f{) + Tt tp],
(33.16)
I:f tp = I�! [eos(ar)tp - sin(ar)S& 1a f{) + T2 tp] ,
(33.17)
are valid where T1 and T2 are operators completely continuous in Lp (a , b). Proof. We have to prove (33.16). If {3 = 0 it coincides with (33.14). If {J =f. 0 then,
as was said above, to obtain the required result we apply differentiation of order {3 with respect to a to (33.14). We begin with the ease of natural {3 = 1, 2, . . . . Multiplying (33.14) by f(a) and differentiating the relation thus obtained {3 times with respect to a and dividing by r( a) we have
(33.18) where
i ar) N!X -_ di (eos E+ L · da:J .� •
i=O
(i) · I
{Ji- i sin(ar) •
•
A -• ua:J
.
8o a a· I
I
Hence we obtain (33.16) for natural {J by the Corollary of Theorem 33.1 and Lemma 33.1. Let now {3 be an arbitrary real number. It would natural to think that we have now to apply differentiation (or integration) of an arbitrary order {J to (33.14). However we can not use the operators of Liouville fractional integra-differentiation since the operator Sa 1 a of the form (33.11) does not preserve the space Lp( a , b) if 1/p < a < 1, and (33.14) is not true if a � 1. It turns out that in this situation the truncated operator
{
1/f(a), Ca = 1, is well-suited for our purpose, where
{
a > O, a = O,
(33.19)
Pt,e is the projection
t � [a, a + c] 0 � a < a + c < 1/p. ( p+a 1E f)(t) = /0,(t ) ' te[ a, a + c] '
(33.20)
§ 33. EQUATIONS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
We replace Q by t in (33.14) and then apply (33.19) with respect to t. A. First we transform the left-hand side of the relation obtained. For ( if Q = 0 we take {3 > 1) by (33.19) we have
(I+ I6t - 'P)(z) = Ca"(a r(1,B) -{J
b
= Ca
7£ a
677
{3 > 0
b
1 V'(y)dy -y' (t - o ) l- P r(t) 1 (y - z) l - t r(t)dt
£
z
( )
T"' -1 y - z dT. f (/3) "'( ) 1 1z (yV'(y)dy 1a -z 0
R
'T
Using the result
(P > 0), (33.21) we find
(33.22) Here
(33.23) according to the relation
j u
as
e - • t a - l dt = ,.a - l e - u
[1 + c�l) ] 0
as
given by Erd«Hyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi In view of Theorem 33.1
l u i -+ ()()
(33.24)
(1, 6.9.2(21), 6.13.1(1)) .
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
678
where Vt is a completely continuous Volterra operator in L,(a, b). Everywhere in the following we shall denote by V2 , V3 , Volterra operators completely continuous in L,(a, b). Hence according to (33.14) and the Corollary to Theorem 33.1 we have • • •
,
z) (t )dt = Ia+� N +e v; = Ia - .8 TVT N +e v; t.p, Ca f (t A_p (tZ)-1 -aa+ a 1 t.p a+ 2 a 1 � t.p �
where N, cp = cos(t1r)cp + sin(t7r)S0 , ,cp. Substituting this expression into obtain the relation
(33.22) we
T a - ,8 Tvacp a - ,8 'P - 1a+ 1-+,8 I,t _ cp = I,_:
where Va = V2 Na+ � V1 . Let now {J < 0, a > and (33.23) we have
0.
Then, using
]+ ]+.8 I'b- l/'J r =ca -v1 a (-1)[- ,8 1
x
Taking
r-z
and
(33.23)
and
(33.21)
0,
then by
d[- .61 + 1 1 1 +,8+[- ,8) -p r(t) + ' r 1, a,e Ibda[- ,8)+ 1 t
[I - 1 -,8-[-,8) n
(33.18)-(33.20)
(33.25)
tn
_l_ T-�
-
)]
" 1 +,8+[- ,8] ( T - z ( r)dr (r - z) 1 - e t.p \
(33.23) into account, by Theorem 33.1 and (33.14) we find
Then from (33.26) we obtain (33.25) with Va = VsNa lf.&. B . Now we transform the expression i! cos(t1r)I! + cp.
If {J >
§ 33. EQUATIONS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
679
(33.18)-(33.20) we have I-+p cos(t1r) Iat + cp -
_
( )
a+e cp(y)dy 1 cos(t7r) z --y t dt. a 'Y Ca J z - y r(,B) J (t - a) l - fJ 'Y a z
-
a
(33.27)
Integrating the inner integral by part and taking (33.21) into account we obtain
( z --y ) t dt ( z --y ) a Ja (t a) l-fJ 'Y - 'Y
+e 1 a f(P)
c
os(t r )
_
_
-
-
In - fJ
'Y
_
z y [cos(a ) - .\ (z - y)], r
_
where
Hence according to Theorem 33.1
(33.27) takes the form (33.28)
For p < 0 a similar result is found in the same way as in case A. C. Finally we consider the expression i�J! + sin (t r) a t cp. Let P > 0. Carrying out integration by parts as in case B, then according to (33.11) we have
S
,
(33.29) where
�(u, T) =
In .1.
r(P) J T in ; E
. •-·
,tJ- • .m
(()I +
. m- •
'!J 1rds --+ 0
as
u --+ 0.
The expression similar to the first term on the right-hand side of (33.29) (with sine replaced by cosine) was considered in case B. Therefore using Theorem 33.1
680
we reduce
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE Fffi.ST KIND
(33.29) to the form
Here the operator-function Vi is completely continuous in Lp(a, b) for r > 0. If r = 0, then complete continuity does not hold in view of the first statement of Theorem 33.1. If we return t o the proof of Lemma 32.4 of the previous section we c an check that the operator-function VT is continuous with respect to r in the operator topology on (0, e] and uniformly bounded with respect to r on [0, e], Also in view of (33.13) we have
� j tor+T-l/p lt 00
II ST +or, l ll � c =
-
1 l - 1 l ln t 1dt.
0
�
Therefore the operator J VT ST + or,1 dT is completely continuous in we obtain the result
0
Lp(a, b),
and so
(33.31) from (33.30). In the case {J < 0 an analogous result is found by arguments similar to those above. Collecting (33.25), (33.28) and (33.31) obtained in the cases A, B and C we arrive at (33.16). Relation (33.17) is derived from (33.16) by applying the operator A : f(z) -+ f(a + b - z) to the left and to the right. The theorem is proved. • From (33.16) and (33.17) the coincidence of the space given in (33.4) and (33.5) follows. Namely, the following assertion is true.
If 0 � a < 1/p, then the Banach spaces r;f(Lp) and I�!(Lp) coincide up to the equivalence of norms:
Corollary.
(33.32)
§ 33. EQUATIONS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
681
33.3. The Noether nature of equations (33.1) We consider
(33.1) which according to the supposition (33.2) has the form
t) lnP -1j v(x, t) lnP -1K cp :: j (xu(x, - t) 1 -a x - t cp(t)dt + � (t - x) l- a t - x cp(t)dt. b
�
(33.33)
a
where - oo < {3 < oo, 0 ::; a < 1 ({3 < -1 if a = 0). We assume the functions u(x, t) and v(x, t) to satisfy the following conditions similar to conditions 1) and 2) for (31.55) in the case 0 < a < 1: thus 1) u(x, x) = u(x, x - 0) E C( [a , b] ), v(x, x) = v(x, x + 0) E C( (a , b]) ; 2) in the case a < 1 the functions u(x, t) and v(x, t) are Holderian of order A > a with respect to x and uniformly in t; 3) in the case a = 1 the functions u(x, y) and v(x, t) are differentiable with respect to x and the inequalities
l ouox l ::; (x -ct)1 l -et ' l -oxov I -< (t - cx)2 l-et '
e1 >
0'
lu(x, t) - u(t, t)l ::; ca(x - t y � , lv(x, t) - v(t, t)l < c4 (t - x)e� , e2 > 0,
hold where Ct , c2 , C3 and c4 are some positive constants. Let us consider the case 0 ::; a < 1/p ({3 < -1 if a = 0). By the Corollary of Theorem 33.2 we shall study the mapping properties of the operator K from the space L,(a, b) = L,, 1 < p < oo , into the space Ia ,P (L,) defined by (33.32). We represent the operator given in (33.33) as
(33.34) where
(33.35) �
1_ u(x, t) - u(t, t) lnp _1_ cp(t)dt (r.r1 ,P cp )( X) = _ , r(a) J (x - tp- a x-t a
1_ j v(x, t) - v(t, t) 1nP _1_cp(t)dt. (r:2 ,P cp)(x) = _ r(a) (t - x)l- a t-x b
�
(33.36)
682
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
Lemma 33.2. If 1 < p < oo, 0 � a < 1/p and u(z, t) and v(z, t) are Holderian functions of order ..\ > a with respect to z uniformly in t, then Tf'f3 and r;·f3 are completely continuous operators from Lp(a, b) into JCJt,f3 (Lp) and
,.,a,(3 .L 1
a ,f3 v;-b - /a+
T.2a ,(3
_
- 16a,-f3 irv2 , _
(33.37}
where the operators v1 and v2 are completely continuous in Lp (a, b). Proof. If 0 < a < 1, fJ = 0, then the assertion of thus lemma coincides with LeJ"ma 31.4 and ,.,a,O = /a v;(33.38) a+ 1 ' T.2a,O = /a6- TT2 ' .L 1 V
where the operators a sin a1r v;1
2
a sin a1r 1r'
Ja (s)ds J (t -u(z,s)ls)-
:r:
(33.39)
'
J (s)ds f' (s -v(z,tps) -(tv(t,- s))1+ dt 6
:r:
.
-
:r:
a
z
a
(33.40)
are completely continuous in Lp(a, b). We transform (33.38) by using the operator given in (33.19), following the same lines as for (33.14) and (33.15) in the proof of Theorem 33.2. After some transformations similar to those above with Theorems 33.1 and 33.2 being taking into account, we have
where the operators Ts and T4 are completely continuous in Lp(a, b). Hence the truth of the theorem follows in view of the complete continuity of the operators V1 and V2 in Lp (a, b). • From (33.27) it follows that the Noether nature of the operator given in (33.3) is equivalent to that of the model operator given in (33.35). The latter in view of Theorem 33.2 is representable in the form
(33.41) where Na is the singular integral operator given by continuous operator in Lp(a, b).
(31.58) and T5 is a completely
§ 33. EQUATIONS WITH POWER-LOGARITHMIC KERNELS
We conclude from
(33.41)
683
that the Noether nature of the operator K from
L,(a, b) into l01•fJ(L,) is equivalent to that of the singular integral operator N01 lp = [u(x, x)+v(x, x) cos(aw)] ll'(x)+
sin (a w)
1r
j ( -t -a) 6
a
Ot
x-a
v(t ' t)l,O(t)dt (33.42) t-x
in L, (a, b). Using here Theorem 31.7 about the Noether nature of the operator N01 we obtain the following statement similar to Theorem 31.12.
Let 1 < p < oo, 0 � a < 1/p and -oo < f3 < oo if a > 0 and f3 < - 1 if a = 0 and let the functions u(x, t) and v( x, t) satisfy conditions 1) and !) indicated above. The operator given by (33.33) is Noetherian from L,(a , b) into [01•{1 ( L,) if and only if Theorem 33.3.
1)
u2 (x, x) + 2u(x, x)v(x, x) cos aw + v 2 (x, x) #= 0, a � x � b;
2)
8(a) #= 2w( -a + 1/p), 8(b) #= 21r/p'
( mod
21r),
(33.43) (33.44)
where x) + v(x, x)e - ia11' e il (%) - u(x, u(x, x) + v(x, x)eia11' '
0 � 8(a)
<
2r.
These conditions being satisfied the index of the operator K is equal to ifO � 8(a) < 2r( -a + 1/p), if21r( -a + 1/p) < 8(a) < 2 w ,
(33.45)
(33.46)
where k is the integer number defined by the condition 8(b) - 2rk E (-21rfp, 21r /p').
(33.47)
In particular, if a = 0 and f3 < -1, then the operator given by (33.33) Noetherian if and only if u(x, x) + v(x, x) #= 0, a � x � b,
is
(33.48)
and the index is equal to x = "'L .-Io·' (L. ) = 0 . Comparing Theorem 31.12 with Theorem 33.3 we obtain an interesting fact.
684
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
The appearance of the factor potential type operator Theorem 33.4.
_
1
tp = f( ) cr M
,
j a
lnP l !tl �
in the kernel of the
c( z , t) (t t lz - t il- er tp )d
which weakens or strengthens (depending on the sign of {3) a singularity of the kernel on the diagonal z = t , changes the range of the operator but does not influence its Noether properties in the sense that if O < a < 1/p, then the Noether nature of the operator K from Lp(a, b) into l0 •P(Lp) is equivalent to that of the singular integral operator given by (33.42) in Lp. Remark 33. 3. Theorem 33.3 may be extended to the case of the space Lp([a, b], p)
with the general power weight
n
Zk l"" . The theorem about the k l from the Holder weighted space H6(P) into the
p{z)
=
n lz =
Noether nature of the operator K generalized Holder weighted space n; +a ,p(p) is also valid - §
33.2.
34.2, notes 33.1 and
33.3 presents the Noether nature of the operator given by (33.33) in the case 0 � a < 1/p. A similar assertion is also true in the case 1/p < a � 1 (see § 34.2, note 33.3). In particular, if a = 1 and {3 > 0 the Noether nature of the operators giv�n in (33.1) with pure logarithmic kernels is valid. More Remark 33.4. Theorem
general investigations of the N oether nature of operators with such kernels have also been carried out (see § 34.2, note 33.4).
§ 34. Bibliographical Remarks and Additional Information to Chapter 6 34.1. Historical notes Notes to § 30. 1. Here we confined ourselves to the case of equations on the axis and on an interval of the axis. The reader may meet the theory of singular integral equations in more detail in the books by Gahov [1] and Muskhelishvili [1], and also Gohberg and Krupnik [4], where these equations are considered on curves in the complex plane. Notes to §§ 30.2 and 30.3. The generalized Abel equation, both in the case of inner and external coefficients, on a finite interval and on a half-axis first arose in Zeilon [1] (1924). In connection with this paper, which was unknown to researchers who dealt with generalized Abel equations between 1960 and 1970, one should refer also to § 17.1, Notes to §§ 11.2 and 11 .3. In this paper by Zeilon a certain fonnalism was proposed of reducing the generalized Abel equation to the characteristic singular equation, or to the Hilbert boundary value problem for analytic functions connected with the latter. This paper also contained the first attempt to consider systems of generalized Abel integral equations with constant coefficients. Zeilon suggested a method of reduction to a singular equation, which is surprisingly original for the year 1924. He
§ 34. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 6
685
stated that the solution of the generalized Abel equation could be reduced to the successive solutions of a singular equation and the usual Abel equation. However, he did not give either a correct solution of the singular equation or an investigation of its solvability at all. Such a solution was known to be obtained much later by Muskhelishvili [1] and by Gahov [1]. The solution of the generalized Abel equation with a sufficiently complete investigation of solvability was first given in this way by Sakalyuk (1] (1960) and (4] (1965) in the case of a finite interval. Sakalyuk used Carleman's method of analytic continuation. The restricted assumptions made in these papers were essentially weakened by Wolfersdorf [2] (1965) and Samko [1] (1967) and (5] ( 1968). In the papers by Samko the solution was based on another method presented in § 30. It is based on the direct connection with the singular operator which allows one not only to clarify the connection between admissible solutions and right-hand sides of the generalized Abel equation, but to investiga�e general equations of the first kind with a power-type kernel as well. The generalized Abel equations (30.17) and (30.18) on the whole axis were solved by Samko (4) { 1968), [7) {1969) and (9) (1970). The presentation in §§ 30.2 and 30.3 follows Samko (27, §§ 3 and 9] (1978), see also a survey by Samko [32]. Notes to § 30.4:. The explicit solution (30.67) was given by Samko (10) (1970), (14] (1973). Refer also (13] (1971) where the sOlution of this equation was obtained in the form {30.63). The cases in (30.72) were noted by Samko [5) (1968). These cases were in general known earlier. We refer to (30.73) in Stein and Zygmund [2] (1965) for functions IP E L 2 (R1 ) with a compact support and (30.74) in Heywood (1967). Heywood (2] (1971) showed that the integrals in {30.73) and (30.74) are conditionally convergent for almost all z if f(z) E JOt(Lp), 1 < p < 1/a. The solution of (30.72) in certain spaces of generalized functions was investigated by Jones (2] (1970). The generalized Abel equation (30. 79) with constant coefficients on a finite interval was specially considered by Wolfersdorf (3) {1969), who gave its solution in tenns of integrAls with the hypergeometric kernel. The solution in the form (30.82) was given Samko (27, § 9] {1978) and it was presented in the book by Gahov (1] (1977). The assertion of Lemma 30.3 was noted by Wolfersdorf [3] (1969) and repeated by Ganeev (1] (1979), [2] ( 1982). In the latter paper the solution of the generalized Abel equation with constant coefficients on a finite interval was also given via the hypergeometric function, but it differed from the result of Wolfersdorf (3]. The solution of (30.83) was first given by Carleman [1] (1922). His solution may be seen in § 34.2 below. Another form of this solution was obtained by Ahiezer and Shcherbina (1] (1957) (see also § 34.2). Willi&IDS [1] (1963), who considered {30.67) in connection with some problem of electrostatics, &JTived at the same result. Krein (1] {1955) &JTived at a certain method of solution of integral equations in his investigations connected with the inverse Stunn-Liouville problem. In particular, he obtained the solution of the Carleman equation (30.83) . In this connection we refer also to Mhitaryan [1] (1968). The form (30.84) for the solution of the Carleman equation was indicated by Samko (3] ( 1968) who also obtained (30.89). Notes to § 31.1. Theorems 31.1-31.4 are well-known theorems in the theory of Noetherian operators. In abstract Banach spaces they were first obtained by Nikol'skii (3] ( 1943) in the Fredholm case when the index is equal to zero, and they were extended by Atkinson (1] and Gohberg (1] ( 1951 ) to the case of non-zero index. One may use Gohberg and Krein (1) (1957) and Kato (1] (1958) together with the books cited in the beginning of § 31 .1 to make an acquaintance with the theory of Naetherian operators in Banach spaces in more detail. Theorems of the type 31.5-31.7 are well-known in a more general case of an arbitrary smooth curve in the complex plane. We gave formulations only for the case of the axis or any interval required. This case was considered especially by Widom (1] (1960). Theorem 31.5 is well-known, as for example in Gohberg and Krupnik (4). Theorem 31.6 is a classical version of statement on the validity of Noether theorems for singular integral equations on an open contour - see the books by Gahov [1] and Muskhelishvili [1]. However, the assumptions on the kernel K:(z, t) in these books were less general. Theorem 31.7 in a more general form was obtained by Gohberg and Krupnik [1-3] (1968-1971). We used the expression given by Karapetyants and Samko [2] (1975) for the recalculation of the index when writing the index in an explicit form. Notes to § 31 .2. The proper setting of the Noether nature for equations of the first kind with a power-type kernel developed here was suggested by Samko [6] (1968). He investigated the
686
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FffiST KIND
Noether properties of {31.6) in such a setting in the papers [12] (1971) and (14) (1978). The presentation in § 31 .2 follows the latter paper in the main. Theorem 31 .10 was proved by Rubin [2] (1972). Notes to § 31 .3. The results of this subsection were obtained by Samko [1] (1967), [6] {1968) and (27) (1978) except for Theorem 31 .12 concerning the Noether nature in Lp on a finite interval, which was given by Rubin [3) (1973). The result for Lp(P) noted in Remark 31.4 was obtained by Rubin [1) {1972) including the case a = -oo or b = oo. The Noether nature in Lp(P) in a more general weighted case was investigated by Rubin [2] (1972), [8] {1975). The criterion of the Noether nature for the operator {31.55) from H�(p) into H;+a (p) mentioned in Remark 31.5 was obtained by Rubin (7) (1974). We remark that the decisive point here is the application of Theorem 13.13 on the isomorphism between the spaces HS'(p)
and H;+a(p), realized by the Riemann-Liouville operators (2.17) and (2.18). It allows one to characterize the class of the right-hand sides f of {31.55) in the same simple terms as the solution
m
j ta-l lc=O L Bm lc lnlc t 0
v[(x - t) eh )dt = -
m -1
: L Bm - l , lc lnlc x,
x
k=O
a>
O,
(34.1)
where v(x) has the form (32.10), cf. the relation in (32.28). We also observe that the solution of the simplest equation (32.18) is contained in the books by M.M. Dzherbashyan (2, Ch. 5, § 1.1, p. 264] and Volterra [3, p. 102). Lemma 32.2 and Theorem 32.1 obtained by Kilbas were not mentioned earlier, as well as equivalence of {32.27) in Lemma 32.2 to the fact that the numbers h1 , h2, . . . , hm in terms of which the solutions (32.20) of {32.3) is expressed, are connected with the roots of the algebraic equation (32.34). Notes to § 32.3. The results of this subsection were obtained by Rubin [10] (1977). Notes to § 33.1. Theorem 33.1 was proved by Rubin [10] (1977). Earlier he obtained the imbeddings in (33.10) in the cases of natural and nonnegative real powers of logarithm in the space Lp (a , b) - see (4] (1973) and [9] (1976), respectively. Notes to § 33.2. The results of this subsection were given by Rubin [4] {1973) and [10] (1977). Notes to § 33.3. The Noether nature of the potential type operators {33.1) with the power-logarithmic kernel from the space Lp (a , b), 1 < p < oo, into the spaces (33.32) was
§ 34. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 6
687
investigated by Rubin for natural, nonnegative real and arbitracy powers of logaritlun in the papers [4) (1973), [9] (1977), respectively.
34.2. Survey of other results (relating to § § 30-33) 30.1 . Ca.rlema.n (1] obtained the solution of the equation
1 rp(t)dt J0 lx - tj 1 -a = /(x), < x < 0
(34.2)
1,
in tenns of the contour integral
rp(x) =
i sin
¥
21r 2
1 t(t- 1) a/2 t d _ �dx � (t-x)a ! [ ] a - t
J(a) da
r�
(34.3)
a(a - 1)
o
where r� is an arbitrary closed contour intersecting the positive real half axis R point 30.2. The solution of the Ca.rlema.n type integral equation
� only in the
x.
a
rp( )d J0 jx2 yy2jy1 -a = f(x), 0 < x < a, _
which is reducible to (34.2) by changes of variable is known in the form
This differs from that derived from (30.82) or (30.84) similar result for (34.2) was obtained by Williams (1]. 30.3. The integral equation of the first kind
-
see Ahiezer and Shcherbina [1]. Later a
c(x-t) Joo lx - tj 1 -a rp(t)dt = /(x), 00
-oo
-
<x<
(34.4)
oo,
with a difference kernel, where
. c(x) = { u(x), v(x), x < O, , u(x),v(-x) E H 1 �
X > 0,
(R+ ),
-' > a
,
is reduced to an integral equation of the second kind with difference singular kernel N'{J :
a 1 rp(x)
sin a1r + 1r
00
Joo
-
v(-t-It-xl ) "P(t)dt X
00
+
Joo T(x-t)"P(t)dt = g(x)
-
688
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
a1 = g(x) = rfaJD+ J. T(x), u(x) tJIT(x)(x)l clxlcr-1 x 1 Nh (x), h (x) E L (R1 )Ncp = >..cp p.Scp N his1 ITcp(x) S(hc(12 cp)lxl) -cr- >.. xN-p.1 1 2 1 (a = = c cp(x) { / f(t)dt - tJ f(t)dt } - >.. 1 P(x,t)f(t)dt. .!!_ dx (x - t)cr J (t - x)cr J c= cis utJ A = u2 tJ2 , = tJsin2 v sA11'in�:Ja11' r(r(1 -1 9/-cr-(211'9')r(2(11'-cr)) ) UtJ ' UtJ x- tt ) UtJ P(x, t) = (x(1 - x)] -1 -cr2F1 ( P(x, t) = -Jz { x - x)) -cr2F1 ( /,r (-: ) } UtJ u = tJ u = -tJ.
where u(O) + t�(O) cos cr1r, The kernel which is evaluated via and explicitly is a continuous function everywhere except for the origin, and has the estimates � as - 0 and � + as - oo. The operator • + • where and are constants, and has the structure + + . H the operator invertible, then the operator has the same form - Samko (16], (27, § 5). 30.4. The generalized Abel equation (30.79) with constant coefficients on a finite interval was solved by Wolfersdorf [3] in the form 0, b 1): z:
sin cr1r + A1r
Here
0
0 if utJ > 0 and
arbitrary if
..\
"f
1
> 0 and
z:
u
_
1
< 0,
0
+ 2utJ cos cr1r +
a1r r (2 - 6j(21r})r(1 - a) A1r2 (a + 1) r (1 - a - 6/(21r)) "f
\. 1\
1
<0
6 2 - -, 1 + a; 2 + a; --21r X(1 - )
if
> 01
, a; 1 + a; z: 1 t) if < 0 where 6 is given in (30.80). Compare this with (30.84) and (30.89) in the cases and Another form of solution was given by Ganeev (2] also in terms of hypergeometric functions. 30.5. The generalized Abel equation (30.41) is also solved in closed form in the case when it is considered on a smooth curve in the complex plane. This case was investigated by Sakalyuk [3] and Peters (2]. The latter author also solved the generalized Abel equation (30.42) on a smooth curve and the equation and
[ (1
1-
f (z cp(tt))dt1-cr k f (t cp(tz))dt1 -cr = f(z), z E C, C, Caz Cza k =. k = e211' i cr +
(34.5)
in the case of a closed contour and being two its constituent arcs. Here k "# 1 and The cases 1 and which imply the degenerate cases of the corresponding k "# Riemann boundary value problem were considered by Chumakov and Vasil'ev [1]. We note that by reduction to (34.5) on a closed contour Peters [2] solved, for example, the equation ••
c. .
e211'icr .
c
f11' 0
xt)- 1t)-cr cp(t)dt = f(x), l
sign ( l sin(x -
0<
x
< 1r.
A modification of (30.41) which corresponds to the case of system of intervals was considered by Chumakov [2]. 30.6. The "exceptional" cases of the generalized Abel equation (30.41), when and vanish simultaneously at a finite numbers of points of the interval [a, b), was investigated by
tJ(x)
u(x)
§ 34. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 6
Vasil'ev (2, 5). The solution of (30.41) in the case when u (x) and v(x) may be infinite at the points was gi�n by Orton (1] in some spaces of generalized functions. 30.7. The algorithm for solving the equation z
u(x)
J a
P� - � (x t) l -a cp(t)dt v(x)
b
+ J (tP�x)-l -�a cp(t)dt
_
_
=
689 a
and
b
f(x)
z
more general than (30.41), where P(x) is a polynomial, was indicated by Sakalyuk [2). Peters (2] considered such an equation in the case of an open smooth curve. We refer also to the case v(x) :: 0, f(x) :: 1 in Neunzert and Wick [1]. We also observe that some generalizations of (30.41) with the Gauss hypergeometric function (1.72) in the kernel on a finite interval and a closed contour was considered by Chumakov (1], and Peschanskii (1], respectively. 30.8. The generalized Abel equation (30.41) on a finite interval has many applications. We note some of them. First of all there are boundary value problems for differential equations of mixed type as for example, WoJfersdorf [2]. We also note the paper by Bzhikhatlov [1] where an equation similar to the generalized Abel equation (30.41) was obtained while solving the boundary value problem for equations of degenerate type. WoJfersdorf (4) gave applications of the generalized Abel equation to problems of game theory. Applications of the particular cases, when u :: v :: 1 or u :: -v :: 1, to problems of magnetobydrodynamics have been indicated by Lundgren and Chiang [1]. Applications of {30.41) with constant coefficients to contact problems of the theory of creep and plasticity were given by Arutyunyan [1, 2] and Arutyunyan and Manukyan (1]. Similar applications in a more general case of a variable coefficient of friction were given by Rubin (15). We also observe that the special case = f of the generalized Abel equation arose in an application to a non-linear Hilbert boundary value problem - Hatcher [1]. 30.9. Although the first attempt to solve systems of generalized Abel integral equations was undertaken by Zeilon (1], their real investigation was begun comparatively recently. More serious approaches were made by Lowengrub and Walton (1] and Walton (1]. In the former paper a system of two equations of the type (30.41) - considered in a non-general form - was reduced to the Riemann boundary problem for two pairs of functions by the method of analytic continuation. In the latter paper the system of two equations more general than those of the form (30.41) was reduced to a complete singular equation. Investigations in the papers were influenced by applications to mixed problems of the theory of elasticity. We refer also to Lowengrub [1] in this conn�tion. Interesting results for system of generalized Abel equation were obtained by Vasil'ev [1, 3, 4). After constructing some Hermitian forms by the given system he obtained the criterion of uniqueness of the solution and the criterion of absolute solvability of the system in terms of sign definiteness of these forms. In certain cases the numbers of solutions and of solvability conditions were expressed via the rank and the signature of these forms. In particular, Vasil'ev (4) reduced systems of the generalized Abel equation U = V f, where and f are vector-functions and U and V are matrix-functions, to a system of singular (U (V = f. integral equations. He gave a similar investigation for systems of the form Complete results on the solvability of systems i n terms of the method of Hermitian forms were given in the case of constant coefficients, for example, when U and V are number matrices. In the case of systems of the form
cosa1f'1�+ cp - 1f_ cp
1:+ c,o+ 16_ cp 1:+ cp) + 16_ cp)
cp
C + C (x t) J t Ix - t11 -a cp(t)dt - f( ) 00
- oo
2 sign
-
_
X ,
690
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
where Ct and C2 are number matrices Vasil'ev [1, 3] obtained explicit relations for inversion of the type (30.68). Vasil'ev [6] considered systems of generalized Abel equations on the whole axis containing a vector-function rp( -x) together with a vector-function rp(x). We also note the papers by Penzel [1, 2] where systems of generalized Abel equations were studied on the half-axis R� in the spaces Lp(R� ; p) with weight p = x"Y. 30o10o The integr�differentiation equation .\
tp
J 1
( x) =
0
sign (x - t)
lx - tla
tp
' (t )dt,
0
1,
appean in problems of approximation of function, under the application of the variational method to the approximation of functions by positive polynomial operators - Kogan [1, 2]. In these papers, by inversion of the right-hand side, this equation was reduced to a homogeneous Fredholm equation of the second kind with a positive defined operator. 30o1 1 o Some results on the solvability of the non-linear integr�differential equation
J F(x, t, rp(t), rp'(t))(x - t)a-1 dt z
=
J(x), x > 0,
0
1,
0
are contained in the paper by Sadowska [1]. 3 1 o 1 o The generalized Abel equation (30.41 ) , i.e. the equation Mrp = u(x)I:+ rp+v(x)If_IP = j, was solved in § 30 in the case 0 < a < 1. It may be considered in the case a � (0, 1) as well. H a < 0, then this relation can be interpreted as a differential equation of fractional order. A comprehensive investigation of the equation Mrp f with an arbitrary a E R 1 was given by Rubin [11]. In pal"ticular, for every a, he constructed a pair of Banach spaces X and connected with the spaces Lp(a, b) such that the operator M is Noetherian from X into 3 1 o2 o The Noether nature of integral equation of the first kind
=
Y.
Mrp :=
J c(x, y)lx - Yla-l rp(y)dy
n
=
Y
J(x), x E 0,
where the function c(x, y) is discontinuous at the diagonal x = y was investigated by Rubin [2, 5) in the case when 0 is a union of intervals of the whole axis and M is considered as an operator from Lp(O; p ) into Ia[Lp(O ; p)) . Rubin [6] also investigated the Noether properties of the operator M in the case when 0 is a sufficiently smooth curve in the complex plane. 3 1 o3 o Rubin [8], [13] investigated the Noether nature of the operator M of potential type (31.1) in a more general case, when c(x, t) may have jumps not only for t = x but for t = a k , k = 1, . m, x = bj , j = 1, . . . , n as well, the case ak = bj being especially important. This generalization is interesting, particularly for the reason that it allows one to consider the equations o o ,
t J ck (x, t)lz - tla-l
k=l
=
/(x)
a ,.
"with a finite number of potential type kernels" . 3 1 o4o The Noether nature of potential type operators stated in Theorem 31.9, can be demonstrated under weaker assumptions about the behavior of u(x, t) and v(x, t) at infinity.
691
§ 34. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 6 That is we restrict ourselves to the case of degenerate functions
u(x, t)
m
=
n 1:=1
L a�:(x)b�:(t),
Lp l01(Lp)
v(x, t) � L c�: (x)d�:(t), and if we consider the Noether property not from 1:=1 from L� into L;+ a . Here � = L�(Rl ) is the Sobolev space of fractional potential type operator being considered as closed one - Skorikov [1].
L
into
but
smoothness, the
31.5. The N oether nature of the equation
- t) f mlx(x,x - t i l -a �P(t)dt 00
=
f(x)
- oo
more general than {34.3), with an "almost difference" kernel was considered by Skorikov (4]. He obtained the criterion of the Noether property and the index formula in the case when m (x, y) has a jump of the first kind with respect to y if y = 0. The investigation was based on the reduction to a certain convolution-type singular equation. 31.6. Samko and Vasil'ev [1] singled out some classes of equations more general than the generalized Abel equation which are reduced to complete singular equations with a meromorphic kernel, and therefore can be solved in closed form. �
Iij+ IP + Jk(x,t)�P(t)dt to the fractional 0 integration operator 10+ in Lp{O, a ) were considered by Kalisch (2] and Malamud (1], (2]. We 31.7.
Problems of similarity of the operator
recall that the operators A and B are named similar in the space X if there exists a linear operator in X invertable in X such that = CB.
C
AC
3 1 .8 . Atkinson (1] considered the equation
f (xPu(x,:- tt)p )a �P(t)dt �
=
f(x),
0<
x < b,
0<
at < 1,
0
which coincides with (31.67) if p = 1. He showed that the unique solution IP of this equation has a smoothness of the form IP(x) = xPa -l + P 1P(x), 1/1 cn (o, b), if the additional smoothness assumptions on the kernel u(x, t) cn +2 {(x, t) R2 : 0 � t � X � b} and the free term + l n f(x) = xP g(x), g(x) e c [o,b] hold and the inequality pat + {J > o is satisfied. The method of investigation is simil81' to the consideration of {31.67) on reduction to a Volterra integral equation of the second kind, and on applying the method of successive approximation to the latter in a special fractional space.
E
E E
31.9 . In connection with the stability problems for the Volterra equation (31.67) of the first kind, Vessel& [1] proved the estimate
provided that u(x, t) and Ut {x, t) are continuous. The estimates of such a kind are inspired by the fact that some information on the derivative of the unknown solution is known in certain applications. A more general norm of the fractional Sobolev space JlP ·• was also dealt with. A generalization of such an estimate presented in the context of the ideas of regularization was given by Ang, Gorenflo and Hai (1].
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FIRST KIND
692
32.1. The equation of the fonn
z:
J c(x - t)k(x - t)
(a , b),
(34.6)
0
which is more general than (32.1) was investigated by Rubin and Volodarskaya [1] and Rubin [13], [14). Here the function c(x) satisfies certain conditions connected with the absolute continuity on [0, b - a), and the kernel k(x) the fonn
has
( ;) ,
k(x) = xa- l g tn
a � O,
(34.7)
"Y > b - a.
Here the factor g {In ;) introduces such a singularity (or zero) into the kernel which is weaker than that of the power function. For example g(x) may have the fonn
;
n
g (x) = IJ In�" , Ink = �, k= l k times
-oo
< f3k < oo.
In the cited papers the weakening or strengthening of the singularity of the kernel is obtained by the application of a convolution operator with respect to the variable a, the kernel of this convolution being, in general, a distribution. 32.2. Rubin [12] obtained the characterization and inversion relations for the convolutions I:f.1
E
00
t J'(x) = - f r(t x_ -a a+ 0
1)
exp
' (a) dt. (t rr(a) )
Then the following statement is true. Theorem 34.1. A n exi•tence of the limit
(Bf)(x)
= elim -o
z:-e
J [f(x) - f(y))#'1(x - y)dy a
where we take f(x) := 0 6eyond the intenuJ.l [a, b), in Lp (a, b) i. the nece••ary condition for the repre•enta6ility of a function f Lp (a, b) in the form f = r:_f.1 1P with 0 < a < 1,
E
E
§ 34. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 6
693
32.5. Volterra and Peres [1] considered the equation
(34.8) a(x, t) being a certain given function, which is more general than (32.3). By means of the relation in (34.�) this equation was reduced to a simpler Volterra equation of the first kind in which logarithmic factors were absent. In particular, if 01 = 1 and m = 1 (34.8) was reduced to a Volterra integral equation of the second kind under some smoothness assumptions on a(x, t) with respect to x. 32.6. Veber [4] obtained the inversion formula for the simplest integral equation (32.2) on the axis:
r�) 1 (x - t)0- 1 In(x - t)
= J(x)
- co
in a certain space of generalized functions which is invariant with respect to Liouville fractional integr
6
x y !. 1 I x - y I
1n
+
=
f(x),
0 � a < x < b < +oo,
(34.8')
Cl
with a = 0 in the form
��
where v 2 and vU� are the Riemann-Liouville fractional differentiation operators (2.22) and (2.23), was first obtained by Ahiezer and Shcherbina [1] (1957) as a particuJar case of solution of more general than (34.8') integral equation (39.10'), with Gauss hypergeometric function in the kernel. A closed-form solution and the solvability conditions of this equation in the case of any a � 0 were investigated by Vasilets [1] in the weighted spaces Lp ([a, b]; p) with the power weight p(x) = (x - a)l' (b - x)". 33. 1 . Theorem 33.3 in the case of the natural powers of logarithm was extended by Rubin [4) to the weighted spaces Lp ([a, b) : p) '!here
n
p(x) = IJ lx - xk l"• , lc= l
a=
x1 <
· · ·
< Xn = b.
(34.9)
Ru� [9) indicated that this result was true for real nonnegative powers of logarithm. 33.2. Kilbas [6) investigated the Noether properties of the operator (33.1) with power logarithmic kernels with natural powers of logarithm from the weighted Holder space HS(P) into
694
CHAPTER 6. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF THE FffiST KIND
H�+a,f' (p), < � < < � + a < = ,p H�(p) H�+a,f' (p) 1:f Lp ::: Lp(a,b), < a < (34.10) r;! I:f [cos(cur) + ( a?r) Sta , a - 1 + Tacp] + c1 (cp), (34.11) r:f I:![cos(a?r) -sin(a?r)Sb , a - 1 + T4cp] + c2 ( cp), Lp c1 (cp) c2 (cp) T4 Ta [10} r;f (Lp) R 1/p < a < 1 (33.1) Lp 33.3-33.4. 32.2. Sta,astJ, S&and,a s., (32.16) (34.1)(32.17)(34.11) case1/p -a1/p1=<1/p,
the generalized weighted Holder space where 0 1, 0 1, {J 1 , 2, . . . is the weight in (34.9). We note that the main role here is played by the theorem on the isomorphism between the spaces and realized by the operators and r;! with power-logarithmic kernel if {J is natural. Its proof uses the properties of the convolution operator (32.19) with the special Volterra function (see § 32.7), together with the results of § 21. 33.3. H cp e 1/p 1, then the relations similar to (33.16) and (33.17) are true
sin
and are some are completely continuous operators in and and where functionals. These relations were proved by Rubin who applied them to the investigation into of the Noether properties of the operator from EB if remark He also proved statement similar to Theorems This method of investigation does not work in the exceptional since the involved in and are bounded if and operators and the operators involved in and are bounded if Therefore the problem of the investigation of the Noether properties of the operator in the remains open. 33.-i. The Noether nature of the potential type operators with pure logarithmic kernels (a = > acting from the space was investigated by Rubin in the case of the first power of the logarithm, and by Kilbas in the case of natural and powers of logarithm. Kilbas [3], [5], [7) investigated the Noether properties of the operator of the fonn
'6
Kj
-oo <
a
oo.
more general than the operator with pure logarithmic kernel > He considered this operator as acting from the space oo, where is the weight into a special space. Here fJj , m ) , 'Y > and among the functions Kj there may be both continuous and piecewise continuous ones with jumps at the diagonal Other results connected with such equations may be seen in the papers by Kilbas 33.5. Rubin and Volodarskaya [1] and Rubin [13] investigated imbedding of the ranges of the convolution operators (34.6) which are more general than the imbedding (33.10). The introduction of the �called generalized Volterra functions and the investigation of their asymptotics by means of properties of the Laplace transfonn lie at the base of these papers. 33.6. The Noether nature of potential type operators with a more general kind (34. 7) of singularity was considered by Rubin and Volodarsk:aya [1] and Rubin [14].
Chapter 7. Integral Equat ions of the First Kind wit h Special Funct ions as Kernels Abstract . In this chapter we shall be concerned with applications of fractional integra-differentiation to the investigation of one-dimensional integral equations of the first kind b
j K(x, t)f(t)dt = g(z),
-oo � a < x < b � +oo,
{1)
a
with the kernels K{z, t) containing special functions. Such equations are closely connected with integral transforms - see § 1.4. Many problems from other fields of mathematics such as differential equations discussed in Chapter 8, function theory and others, also problems in physics, mechanics and other natural sciences are reduced to them. The so-called dual and triple integral equations - see typical examples in the last section of this chapter - can be written in the form {1). Equations of the form {1) are equations of the first kind and therefore the problem of their inversion is an ill-posed problem. Many methods of solution are known for such equations, which depend on the type of the kernel. The convolution equations, i.e. the equations of the form {1) with K(z,t) = k(x - t), have been most studied - Gahov and Cherskii (1], Titchmarsh (1]. Hirshman and Widder (1], H.M. Srivastava and Buschman (3]. We observe that the latter book contains many equations with special functions as kernels and their solutions, as well as a large bibliography of the papers devoted to solution in closed form of convolution equations with variable upper or lower limits of integration. Solutions of equations such as { 1), which are generalizations or modifications of the Abel integral equation {2.1), and also solutions of the composition type equations connected with the Abel equation are constructed in this chapter. It turns out that the most effective method is the factorization method, also called the composition expansion method, which gives a representation of some classes of
696
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
the operator ( 1) as the compositions of fractional integro-differentiation operators together with other operators which have known inversion formulae. Many . mathematicians throughout the world have made considerable contributions to the development of this method, which was started for the equations considered in the early 1960s - see § 39.1 . However, we note that long before this the implicit idea of the factorization method was used by the Russian mathematician Sonine [4, 5] at the end of the 19th century and the method itself was in fact applied by Lebedev [1] in 1948 - see § 39.1 and § 39.2 (notes 37.3 and 35.7) .
§ 35. Some Equations with Homogeneous Kernels Involving Gauss and Legendre Functions In this section we consider the Mellin convolution integral equations with the Gauss hypergeometric function or the Legendre function as kernels which are important in applications. We shall show that these equations can be inverted in terms of compositions of two fractional integro-differentiation operators with power weights, or in terms of operators involving Gauss or Legendre functions and usual differentiation in a quite symmetrical way. We shall use the results of § 10.1 in these investigations.
35. 1 . Equations with the Gauss function We deal with the following four integral equations involving the Gauss hypergeomet ric function as a kernel (35.1)
t: (x - r)e- 1 2 F1 (a, b; c; l - ;T ) cp(r)dr = g(x), I f(c)
(35.2)
e
(35.3)
/ (r - z)e-1 2 F1 (a, b; c; l - ;T ) cp(r)dr = g(x), d
f(c)
(35.4)
considered on an interval 0 � e < x < d � oo. In accordance with Remark 10.3 we denote the operators on the left-hand sides of (35.1)-(35.4) by 1 /�+ (a, b)cp, 2 /�+ (a, b)cp and 3/:f_ (a, b)cp, 4/:f_ ( a, b)cp if d < oo or 3 /: (a, b)cp, 4 /: (a, b) cp if d = oo.
§ 35. KERNELS INVOLVING GAUSS AND LEGENDRE FUNCTIONS
697
By the relations given in {10.22)-{10.29) the operators j lc(a, b) are the compositions of two one-sided fractional integrals or derivatives with power weights. The conditions for such a representability are given by Theorem 10.4 and Remark 10.3, which show that if tp{z) belongs to the space Lp or some of its subspace, then under corresponding conditions the operators i Ic(a, b) map a certain subspace of Lp and some or other of the relations given in {10.22)-{10.29) are valid. This means that if the right-hand side, i.e. a function g(z), is taken from the space Dj indicated in Table 10.2 which is mapped by the operator j lc(a, b), then the corresponding equation i Ic( a, b )tp = g is uniquely solved by successive inversion of two integro-differentiation operators composing jlc(a, b). Realizing these inversions we obtain from {10.22)-(10.29) the following representations of solutions of {35.1)-{35.4):
tp{z) = z- a I;:xa I!+ cg(z ),
tp{z) = z - b I!; c xc- a I;:x a+b -cg(z), tp{z) = I!; c x a I;:x - 4g(z ),
tp{z) = za+b - c I;;xe-a I!; e x - " g(z), tp{z) = x - " I�: e xe- a li�z a+b - eg(z), tp{z) = z -a li� Xa J�: eg(z),
tp{z) = za+b - e li�ze- a I�: e x - "g(z).
(35.5) {35.6) (35.7) (35.8) (35.9) (35.10) (35.11) {35.12)
To formulate the corresponding theorem we denote by Ej a column of numbers which is obtained after replacing (10.22)-(10.29) by (35.5)-(35.12) respectively in column Ej of Table 10.2. Then the following statement is true.
We consider (35.1) and {35.2) with e = 0 on the interval {0, d) and {35.3) and {35.4) with d = oo on the interval {e, oo) provided that Rec > 0. If the conditions Aj from Table 10. 2 are satisfied for the operators Bj and a given function g(x) E Dj , 1 � p < oo, then the corresponding equation Bjtp = g of the forms (35.1)-(35.4) has a unique solution given by the expression Ej where e = 0 and d = oo. The statement of the theorem remains t"'e when e > 0 and d < oo correspondingly, and in these cases the assumptions in the conditions Aj involving p are omitted. Theorem 35.1.
Proof. In fact, all the conclusions of the theorem were obtained in the proof of Theorems 10.2 and 10.4 and Remark 10.3. We additionally note that, for example, if e > 0 then the singular point = 0 of the kernel of (35.1) lies beyond the interval
T
698
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
of integration. This fact allows us to remove the conditions containing p from the assumptions At and A2 , since singularities of the function
( )
d m X a X - a 1m-b Xa 1(m-c)-(m-b)g {X )
or
( � r g(z),
m=
1, 2, . . .
'
It should be emphasized that the latter relation is not equivalent to {35.5) since the function g( x) here is assumed to belong to the subspace of functions in Lp ( e, d) representable by the form g = I� x , x E Lp(e, d), i.e. having the derivative g (m ) (x) and g(e) = g'(e) = · · · = g ( m - l ) (e) = 0. Comparing two last expressions with {10.24) and taking {10.19) into account we arrive at the following representations for the solution of {35.1):
r
{
dzm
za
�
! (xr-(mr)-m-c)c- 1 (-a, m - b., m - . 1 - ;T ) g(r)dr} , 2 F1
c,
� (x m- c- 1 !
m
c)
{35.13) {35.14)
0 < Re c < m , g E cm ((e, d]) g(e) = g' (e) = · · · = g <m - l ) (e). It is clear that Lp , .(e, d) = L,(e, d) if e > 0 as is seen in transform other relations given in {35.6)-(35.12).
{10.2).
Similarly we can
§ 35. KERNELS INVOLVING GAUSS AND LEGENDRE FUNCTIONS
699
35 .2. Equations with the Legendre function Different particular cases of equations (35.1)-(35.4) with the kernel involving Chebyshev, Legendre, Gegenbauer, Jacobi, etc. polynomials arise in applications to differential equations as for example in § 40.2. Here we consider equations that will be most useful below, i.e. equations with the Legendre function given in (1.79), (1.80) as a kernel:
J(z2 - t2)-P/2Pt (i) f(t)dt :1:
=
g(z) ,
(35.15)
=
g(:z),
(35.16)
j(t2 - z2 ) -p /2p: (i) f(t)dt = g(x),
(35.17)
e
f(:z2 - t2) -pf2Pf: G) /(t)dt :1:
e
d
:1:
j (t2 - z2) -Pf2Pf: ( ;) f(t)dt = g(:z), d
{35.18)
:1:
provided that 0 ::; e < x < d ::; oo and Re p < 1 in all cases and that the integrals indicated above converge at the variable end point. We shall obtain solutions of these equations by the Mellin transform. We consider the first equation in more detail. In (35.15) we change the variables and the functions by the substitutions
z2
=
y, y/T = '1,
(71 - 1) -P /2 H(71 - 1) P: (Vii'J = h(71), g( VY) = 9t ( Y), where H(e) is the step function, namely H(e) = Then this equation has the form
f h(y/T)cp(T)T- 1 dT
1 if e > 0 and H(e) = 0 if e < 0.
00
0
=
(35.19)
9t (y).
700
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
Applying the Mellin transform defined in (1.112) to the latter and 11.14 (1) from the book by Marichev [10] and taking the convolution theorem given in (1.115) into account we obtain the relation - s) 2 �J f((1 + p +f(1v)/2s)f(1/2 - s)f((p - v)/2 - s) 91 (s), Rep < 1, Re(2s - p - v) < 1, Re (2s + v - p) < 0.
'P ( s) _
•
-
•
(35.20)
The inverse path from (35.20) to its original tp(t), and hence f(t), can be carried out by various methods. We shall indicate three of them here, which lead to different forms of solutions. A. Using the representation given in (10.35) and grouping the gamma functions by different ways (vertically and crosswise) we obtain the following two representations for the function tp( y): 'P( Y)
=
2 - IJ ( y( 1 - �J -11)/2 J��+v- 1 )/2 ) { y 1 +( 11 -�J)/2 J��- 11- 1 )/2 y - 1 /2 )g1 { y) , {35.21)
tp( y) 2 _ #J (y( 1 -�J-11)/2 J��+ 11)/2 y - 1 /2 ) {y 1 +( 11- �J)/2 J��-v)/2 - 1 )g1 ( y) . (35.22) =
These representations coincide for sufficiently good functions g 1 ( y) (for which the operators in the parenthesize are commutative) since they differ from each other by replacing v by - v - 1 which is not essential according to the property Pf(z) = P� 11 _1 (z). Making the inverse change in (35.21) by the expressions given in (35.19) we arrive at the following representation for the solution of (35.15):
11- 1 )/2 X - 1 g ( X ) /( X ) - 2 1 - IJ X -vJe(+iJ +;zv� 1 )/2 X 2+ 11- IJ ]e(�J+ ;z � _
(35.23)
where 1:+ ;z � is the operator defined in § 18.2, see (18.41). B . Another representation for the solution can be obtained if we multiply the numerator and denominator of (35.20) by f(1 + (p + v)/2 - s) and then apply the duplication formula given in (1.61) for the gamma-function together with (10.35) and its analogue in the form
xf1 /2 rJt-{j x - a/2 f(x) O + ; v'i"
=
_1_ 2 7r i
21 <
-y + ioo
J
-y - ioo
f{1 - a - 2s) /* (s)x -' ds, f{1 - {J - 2s)
1 - Rea.
{ 35 . 24)
§ 35. KERNELS INVOLVING GAUSS AND LEGENDRE FUNCTIONS
701
Then
cp
*
(
+ (JJ + v)/2 - s) (s ) , s ) = 2" r(1r(1+ - +2s)r(1 I' v - 2s)r((JJ - v)/2 - s) 9 1 *
cp( y) = 2 " (y- (JJ +v)/2 ��:t'�)( y1 +(v-p) /2 J(}_; - 1y(p + v)/2 )g1 ( y) , and finally the desired solution of the equation
(35.15) can b e written in the form (35.25)
C. In many cases the third form of representation for the solution of (35.15) via an expression almost symmetric with (35.16) is used. To obtain it firstly we note that the difference between parameters of gamma-functions in the numerator and the denominator in (10.35) is equal to {3 - a and if Re ({3 - a ) < 0, then the integral on the right-hand side of (10.35) corresponds to the fractional integral xf3 Ig;P x- a , and if Re ({3 - a) > 0 then it corresponds to such a fractional derivative. Analogously, the difference of parameters in (35.20) is equal to 1 - I' with Re(1 - p) > 0, i.e. the right-hand side of (35.20) corresponds to the fractional derivative of a function g1( y) . So in terms of originals it is convenient to write this fractional derivative as a composition of the operators including the usual differentiation operators. To return to originals, we use the fact that according to ( 10.35) multiplication by (1 - {3 - s) n in terms of the Mellin transform corresponds to the operator n (n n z - fJ ) /2 xf3 ( /z) xn - fJ when a - {3 = -n and that the correspondence zP/2 Multiplying and dividing the right-hand +-+ (1 - {3 - 2s) n follows from (35.24). side of (35.20) by (1 - {3 - s) n or (1 - {3 - 2s)n with the corresponding numbers {3 = 1 + (v - p )/2 or {3 = n we write the right-hand side of (35.20) in the form
( 4J:)
(�-'-
2- P r(1 - s)r(1/2 - s) v ) r((1 + I' + v)/2 - s)r((JJ - v)/2 + n - s) -2- - n 91 (s), 2-p- n r ((1 - n)/2 - s)r(1 - n/2 - s) r(( 1 + I' + v)/2 - s)r ((JJ - v)/2 - s) (1 - n - 2s)n g1 (s). •
8
•
If 1 - Re JJ - n < 0, then the first gamma-functions correspond to the kernel of ''fractional integral" of the form (q - 1)- Pt /2 H(TJ - 1)Pt'11 (TJ- 112) with specially selected parameters 1'1 and v1 ; see Marichev [10, 11.13(4)] . The second multipliers correspond to the above operators of usual differentiation with power multipliers which can lie both outside and inside of the integral. In the latter case additional assumptions on the function 91 ( Y) are needed. Passing to the originals in the given
702
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
expressions after the changes given in (35. 19) we finally obtain the following four representations for the solution of (35.15):
X
J(z2 - r2)<"+�J)/2- 1 P�;:-�J ( ;) g( r)dr, :r:
e
/( z) =z -n
J (z 2 :r:
_
r2 )
e
(35.26)
( ;) Tl - �J -11 (35.27)
J(z2 - T2)(n+•)/2- 1 T-n p;-n-" (;) g(T)dT } • :r:
e
J :r:
/(z) = ( z 2
_
r2 ) (n+�J)/2- 1 p; - n - �J
e
( ; ) g(n) ( r)dr.
{35.28) (35.29)
The latter relation contains an operator in the form (35. 16). Thus, replacing here g
(35.31)
/{z) =z -n
J (z2 :r:
_
t2 ) (n+�J)/2 - 1 p;-n- �J
e
(�) t�J+n - 1 (35.32)
cf. (35.25) with (35.30) and (35.28) with (35.32).
§ 36. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AS INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS
703
Replacing in (35.15) and (35.16) t 2 - P f(t) by /(t - 1 ), z " g(z) by g(z - 1 ), z by and e by d- 1 we arrive at (35.18) and (35.17). This property allows us to use the solutions obtained for finding corresponding solutions of (35.17) and (35.18). In particular, the solutions
z- 1
/(z) = (z/2) " + 1 I:: "- 2 z 1 _ , _ , I�!;�2 zP -"- 3g(z), (35.33) 1 1 + 11 p + " 1 (35.34) /(z) = 2 ,+ 1 zP +,+ 1 Id-"- ;z-2 z - Id"- z -"- g(z) follow from (35.30) and (35.25). We shall not write analogues of (35.26)-(35.29) which can be obtained in the indicated way. We only note that solutions of (35.17) and (35.18) are representable by expressions different from (35.28)-(35.29) and (35.31)-(35.32) respectively, only by changing the intervals of integration of (e, z) to (z, d) and (z 2 - t 2 ) (n + p)/ 2 - 1 to ( -1) n (t 2 - z2 ) (n +p)/2- 1 . Using the method which led us to the solution given in (35.25) one can see by direct evaluation that besides (35.33) and (35.34) other forms for the solution of (35.17) and (35.18) which are admissible are (35.35) (35.36) respectively. On the basis of results from § 10.1 and using Theorem 18.1, Lemma 31.4, Remark 10.3 and the symmetry property of the Legendre function Pf (z) = P�11 _ 1 ( z), by which we can assume Rev � - 1/2 without loss of generality, the results obtained can be stated as the following theorem.
Let Rep < 1, Re v � -1/2 and 0 < e < d < oo. Equations (35.15), (35.16) and (35.17), (35.18) are solvable in L,(e, d), 1 � p < oo, if and only if g E I::; �' (L,(e, d)) and g E I�: " (L,(e, d)) respectively. These conditions being satisfied, each of the equations has the unique solution given by (35.25), (35.30) and (35.35), (35.36). The cases e = 0 and d = 0 in (35.15), (35.16) and (35.17), (35.18) respectively are more complicated and therefore they require further investigations (see § 39.2, note 35.3).
Theorem 35.2.
§ 36. Fractional Integrals and Derivatives as Integral Transforms When introducing the fractional integro-differentiation operators I:+ and I6_ in § 2, we in fact considered separately three cases namely integration if Re a > 0,
704
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
Rea < 0
Rea = 0,
differentiation if and integro-differentiation of imaginary order if -:/; However, there is a way of defining these operators for all values of c:r at the same time if we use Fourier or Mellin transforms. Thus we may write down the equations
a 0.
-y +ioo 1 f f{1 - a - s) /* {s + a)x- • ds, 10a+ / ( x ) = i {36.1) 21r -y-ioo f{1 - s) Re(s + c:r) < 1, -y +ioo {36.2) et(z) = 2�i-y -fioo r(��)a/•(s + a)z- • ds , "'( = Res > 0, see {10. 3 5) and {10. 3 6), which follows from (7.17) and (7.18) after applying the inverse Mellin transform defined in {1.113). Here / *{s) denotes the Mellin transform of a function /{x) given in {1.112). The integrands on the right-hand sides of {36.1) and {36.2) contain the
ratio of two gamma-functions. This stimulates us to consider more complicated constructions of such a kind involving the ratio of arbitrary products of gamma functions as for example constructions similar to the integrand in defining the Meijer G-function. Realization of the latter approach in terms of originals will lead to an integral transform of type with the Meijer G-function as a n kernel where k(z, t) c� Its particular cases were indicated in §
{1.95)
=
(� I��:� ).
{1.44)
1.4 .
However the language of originals proves to be inconvenient for constructing the theory of integral convolution transforms. There are two reasons for this. First of all, as in the case of 10+ and J� , a definition of the transform can prove to depend essentially on parameters of the G-function though the G-function itself depends on its parameters analytically. Secondly, the G-function exists not for all values of m, n, p, q. For example, it does not exist if p q or m n p, q � Therefore it is more convenient to use the language of the Mellin transforms in order to define integral convolution-type transforms by using the Parseval relation given in
= =0
= = 0,
0.
{1.116).
36. 1 . Definition of the G-transform. The spaces 9Jt;:;(L) and L�e ,-y ) and their characterization
h*{s) {1.116)
Taking in to be a ratio of products of gamma-functions as in we arrive at the following concept.
{1.95)
§ 36. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AS INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS
Definition 36.1.
705
The G-transfonn of a function / (z) is defined by the integral
( I��? I f(t)) (x) 1 j (bm ) + s, 1 - (an ) - s _ = -_ 21ri r [ (a; + l ) + s, 1 - (b� + l ) - s ] 1• (s ) z • ds,
(G/)(x) :: a;.n
(36.3)
u
where r (a( b;m+)1 )++s,s, 1 1--(b(a�n+)1 )--8 8 - r a b t ++s,s, .. .. .. ,, bam, ++ 8,s, 1 1--b a1 --s,s, .. .. .. ,, 11 -- ab,n -- 8s m+ l n+ l m n n f(b; + s) n r(1 - a; - s) j=- l,--j= - -= --,--l-- -- -- -- ---- -- -- n r(a; + s) n r(1 - b; - s) j=m+ l j=n+ l
[
]
[
] (36.4)
f•(s) is the Mellin transfonn - see (1.112) - of a function /(z) on the line +1 ) = u = {s, Res = 1/2} = {1/2 - ioo, 1/2 + ioo} ; (an ) = a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a n; (a; an+ b an+2 , . . , a,; (bm ) = bt , . . . , bm; (b� +1 ) = bm+b · · · , bq; and the components of p- and q-dimensional vectors (a,) and (b9 ) are complex numbers which satisfy the conditions
.
Rea; =F 1/2 + 1, j = 1, . . . , n; Reb; =F -1/2 - 1, j = 1, . . . , m.
(36.5)
It is clear that if m = n = p = q = 0, then
(do8 1 : 1/(t))(z) = /(z).
(36.6)
It is natural to care about the convergence of the integral in (36.3). Since in accordance with (1.65) the gamma-function has a power-exponential asymptotic expansion as l lm s l oo then the space of functions is to be characterized by j•(8) with power-exponential weight at infinity. This justifies the necessity to introduce the fs:>llowing three definitions.
-+
706
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
Definition 36.2.
The ordered pair ( c•, -y•) where
+-q c* = m + n - p2 ,
(36.7)
is called a characteristic of the G-transform (36.3), the value '1 = 2sign c* + sign -y * is called an index of the G-transform and the function bm ) + s, 1 - (an )+- s H ( s ) = f [ ((a; + l ) + s, 1 - (b� l ) - s
(36.8)
]
(36.9)
and the number p + q are called an image of the kernel and an index of the complexity of the G-transform, respectively. Definition 36.3. Let c, -y E R1 and 2signc + sign-y � 0. We denote by rot;,�( L ) the space of functions f(x), 0 < x < oo, representable in the form
j
f(x) = 2�i /*(s)x - •ds,
(36.10)
(T
(36.11) where F(s) E L(u). We denote rotO,� ( L) as rot- 1 (£) for brevity. We denote by L�c,-y ) the space of functions f(x) , 0 < x < oo, satisfying (36.10) and (36.11) where F(s) E L 2 (u), 2signc + sign-y � 0, and the integral along u is assumed to be mean square convergent. The pair (c, 1) is called a characteristic of the space rot;,�(L) and L�c,-y ). I t follows from (1.65) that the asymptotic relation
Definition 36.4.
(36.12) holds and hence the integral
j
h(s) = 2�i H (s)x - •ds (T
(36.13)
§ 36. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AS INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS
707
is convergent everywhere in the case c• > 0 except at the point x = 1 if TJ = 0, 0 < 'Y * � 1, p = q, and it is divergent everywhere if TJ = 0. However, if 11 = 0 and p :/; q, then the function h( x) may be defined via the convergent integral of the form given in {36.13) with the contour u coinciding with the line Re s = 1 /2 + c;sign (q - p), £ > 0. Therefore the case 11 > 0 is connected with the usual direct G-transform realized by the Meijer G-function. The cases 1J < 0 are singular and, in particular, they correspond to the inverse transform of Laplace, Stieltjes and Meijer-type transforms if c• < 0 and of a fractional differentiation if c• = 0, 'Y• < 0. As for the cases 11 = 0 they correspond to Watson type transforms, i.e., in particular, to the Narain transform - see Marichev [10, Sec. 8.3], the Hankel transform, and Y- and H-transforms considered below in § 36.7 when p :/; q, or to transforms of the type of integrals of imaginary order when p = q. The given definitions of the spaces rot��(L) and L�c ,-y) take the behavior of H(s) at infinity into account. Namely, if c + c• > 0 or c + c• = 0 and 'Y + 'Y* � 0 (which can be briefly written as the inequality 2sign ( c + c•) + sign ('Y + 'Y * ) � 0) then the integral in {36.3) is absolutely convergent in the case of rot;,�(L) or in square mean in the case of L�c ,-y ) , respectively. We give some properties of these spaces. 1) The relation L�o,o) = L 2 {0, oo) is true. 2) x - 1 f(x - 1 ) E rot��{L) or L�c ,-y) if and only if f(x) E rot��(L) or L�c ,-y) , respectively. 3) The sets of spaces rot��{L) and L�c,-y) are well-ordered in the sense that
{36.14) if 2sign ( c' - c) + sign ("'(1 - "'() > 0. 4) The spaces rot;,�(L) and L�c,-y) with the norms ll f ll rat- 1 = (c •r)
j
I F( s) ds l ,
11/II L 2
(36.15)
(1
and the usual operations of addition and multiplication by scalar are Banach spaces which are isometric to L( -oo, oo) and L 2 ( -oo, oo ) , respectively. 5) The following theorem gives a characterization of spaces rot��(L) and L�c,-y) in terms of spaces rot- 1 (L) and L 2 (0, oo) , respectively.
a) The spaces rotO,�{L) and L�o,-y) consist of functions f(x) representable in the fonn f(x) = x-"Y J6+
Theorem 36.1. oo ,
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
708
which there exist the constants Mj depending only on f(z) such that
m > c + "'f, n = 1 , 2, 3, . . . ,
(36.16)
and the norm an (36.16) is evaluated in the space rot- 1 (L) and L2 (0, oo), respectively.
The proof will be given only for the space L�c,'"f), since it is similar for the case of
rot;,�(L).
a) Let
c = 0.
Then by definition
/(z) E L�o,'Y) if and only if
f(z) = 2�i j s -'Y F(s)z - • ds, F(s) E L2(u),
(36.17)
(7
where the integral converges in square mean. We transform (36.17) to the form
1 r(1 - s) F (s)z ds, /(z) = 21ri J r(1 + 'Y s) 1 _
-·
(36.18)
(7
According to (1.66) F1 (s) belongs to L2 (u) if and only if F(s) E L 2 (u). Since 1 � 0 then f(1 - s)/f(2 + 1 - s) E L 2 (u) and in accordance with the Parseval relation (1.116) in the space L2 - see , for example, the book by Titchmarsh [1, p. 127, Theorem 73 and p. 71, the formula 2.1.17] - we have
1 r(1 - s) F (s)z ds = 1 (1 - t)'Y
(7
where
F1 (s).
Then from (36.18)
f(1 - s) 1 d d 16+ l +'"f - .S TY+ 1
§ 36. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AS INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS
709
Since F1 (s) E L2(u) then
� j s-'Ye-wcllm •I F(s)z-' ds,
/{z) = 2 i
F(z) E L2(u).
q
It follows from {1.65) that the functions F(s) and
m > 1 + c, belong or do not belong to the space L2 ( u) simultaneously. The function smr- 1 (1/2 - c - "Y + m + 2cs) satisfies the conditions of the theorem in the book by M.M Dzherbashyan [2 , Subsection 2.3.2]. Therefore L�c,-y ) coincides with the space Lf of Dzherbashyan [2, p. 90] where
4>(s) = sm /f (1/2 - c - "Y + m + 2cs ) ,
m > "Y + c.
Hence the product
sme- 2c• ln n
ft ( 1 + k + m - 2csc - "Y - 1/2 ) '
1:= 1
s E u,
converges boundedly to the above function 4>( s) as n � oo. The latter implies that sme- 2c• ln n fi 1 + l:+ -��,. _ 1 72 /4>{s) is uniformly bounded with respect to s
1:= 1
(
m
)
and n. Then by a statement due to M.M. Dzherbashyan [2, p. 90] /(z) belongs to Lf = L�c ,-y ) if and only if the estimate in (36.16) is true. The theorem is thus proved. We just note that in the case of rot;,�(L) the corresponding result by Vu Kim Than [4) for the space rot+ 1 (L) instead of the latter cited statement should be used. •
36.2. Existence, mapping properties and representations of the G-transform We now consider the question of the existence and ma�ping properties of the operator of the G-transform in the spaces rot;,�(L) and L2c,-y ) , and also obtain its
710
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
representations in the usual form via the integrals containing Meijer G-functions in the kernel along the ray (0, oo) . The following statement answers the questions concerning existence and mapping properties.
The G-transform defined in (36.3) with the characteristic (c* , -y*) exists in the spaces rot;:� (L) and L�e,� ) if and only if
Theorem 36.2.
2sign (c + c*) + sign (-y + -y *)
;::: 0.
(36. 19)
Under this condition the G-transfonn isomorphically maps the spaces rot;:� (L) and L�e ,� ) onto the spaces rot;�e• �+� · (L) and L�e+e • .�+�· ) , respectively. . Proof. Let / (z) E rot;:� (L) or L�c.� ) . Then it follows from (36.10) and (36.11) that f*(s) = s -�e- 1r ellm •l p(s) , F(s) E L(u) or F(s) E L2 (u) respectively. Since ( c* , -y*) is the characteristic of the G-transform, then the asymptotic relation given in (36. 12) holds with the values defined in (36.7) . Hence taking s E u into account we obtain the representation
(36.20) where F1 (s) E L(u) or F1 (s) E L2 (u) . Hence the integral in (36.3) defining the . . . . . ( • 1 � I" f It eXISts, IS a functiOn m the space nnG-transtorm, J""e+e • .�+�· (L) or L 2e+e '�+�· ) . We find now the conditions for the existence of this integral. Since lz -' 1 = z - 1 1 2 for s E u and F1 (s) E L(u) or L2 (u) , then only the power-exponential weight s -�- -r · e- r ( e+e• ) llm •l influences on its existence. If c + c* > 0, then this weight decreases exponentially as IIm sl ---+- oo for any value of "Y + -y* . If c + c* = 0, then this weight decreases only for "Y + -y* > 0, or it is bounded for "Y + -y* = 0. These can be unified into the same condition of the form (36. 19). If these conditions are not satisfied, then the weight increases at infinity and therefore the integral (36.3) is divergent. Isomorphism of the map is clear from the above arguments. • Theorem 36.3.
Let the inequality 4sign c* + 2sign -y* + sign IP - ql > 0
(36.21)
and the conditions Re bj > - 1/2, j = 1, 2, . . . , m;
Reaj
<
1/2, j = 1 , 2, . . . , n,
(36.22)
hold. Then the G-transform defined in (36.3) exists in the space vn- 1 (L) and may
§ 36. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AS INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS
711
be represented as the following Mellin convolution integral 00
(G/){z) = J �n pq 0
(� I (b,)a, ) y
y y
( ) f ( y) d
{36.23)
containing the Meijer G-function. condition in (3 6. 21) holds, then the G-function
Proof. If the
a;'."
(• I ��:� )
exists and is integrable on any interval [c, E], 0 < c < E < oo, everywhere including the singular point z = 1 provided that c* = 0, p = q. For 0 < 'Y * < 1 this function has a singularity of order 0{{1 - zp* - 1) as observed from 8.2.1.48 in Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev [3]. Consider firstly p � q. Then this G-function has asymptotic estimates near the singular points z = 0 and z = oo which may be written in the form (see Marichev [10, Sec. 8.3] or [12]):
O(lzla -1 ) + clz iP cos[(q - p)z1/(q-p) + 6], z a> - 1max � k � n Reak and c = 0, c5 = const or 0, c #= 0, q � p + 2, (q - p)p = {1 + p - q)/2 ---+-
* c =
oo ,
{36.24)
* 'Y .
Hence it follows that
{36.25) for c• > 0 or c* = 0 and 'Y * > 0, q = p. Therefore according to {36.22) the left-hand integral converges boundedly if s E u. The latter means that there exists a constant c > 0 such that for any c > 0, E > 0 and t E R1 the estimate E
I
j K(z)zit-1/2dzl £
�
c,
(I )
K{z) -- �n z (a, Pf (b,)) z • -1 '
holds - see Vu Kim Tuan [4]. Further, the inequality q � p + 2 following from the one q > p for c• = 0 is to be taken into account. Then from (36.21) and (36.24) it
712
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
follows that the additional term of the form 00
c
• - 1 xl2( q -p)) - 1 - 1 1 2 cos[(q - p)x 1 f(q-p) + 6]dx x J1 00
j t
= c (q - p) 9 = Im s ,
cos[(q - p)t + 6]dt,
(36.26)
1
s E u,
arises on the right-hand side of (36.25) in the remaining case c* = "'' * = 0, q ;:::: p+ 2. The latter integral in (36.26) converges boundedly also. So the conditions given in (36.21) and (36.22) ensure a bounded convergence of the integral in (36.25) for s E u . Hence by the Parseval relation - see (1.116) - in the space rot- 1 (£) the integral in (36.23) is convergent and is equal to (36.3) - see Vu Kim Than [1]. Now let p ;:::: q. Applying the reflection relation ( 1.36) and the translation relation ( 1.97) for the G-transform to the right-hand side of (36.23) and making the change of variables x = 1/x' and y = 1/y' we have
-(b,) ) ]:_ ( _!_) ( _!_) Joo qp ( � -(ap)
_!_ (G/) x' x'
G':.m
=
0
x' y'
y'
f
y'
dy' . y'
(36.27)
Using now property 2) of the space rot- 1 (£) given in § 36.1, we easily arrive at the case p � q. •
( I�::� )
Remark 36.1. If c• = -y• =
0 and p = q, then the G-function c;-.n :r has 1 a non-integrable singularity of order 0((1 - x) i� - ), Im.,P = 0, at the point x = 1 and hence the integral in (36.23) is convergent in such case only for f(x) = 0. The condition in (36.21) excludes this case.
Let 2sign c* + sign "''* ;:::: 0 and let the conditions in {36. 22) be satisfied. Then the G-transform exists in the space L2 (0, oo) and can be represented in the form
Theorem 36.4.
: J a;:'+���. ( � I �b�i� -n 00
(Gf)( :r ) =
.,
0
)
!(y)dy
(36.28)
where (ap )+1 = a 1 + 1 , a2 +1, . . . , ap+l. If additionally 2sign c* +sign ("Y* - 1/2) > 0, then the G-transform defined in (36.3) exists in the space L2 (0, oo) and may be represented as in (36.23) .
§ 36. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AS INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS
713
Proof. If 2sign c* + sign-y• � 0 then the function given in {36.9) is bounded on the line u in view of the asymptotic estimate in {36.12). Therefore H(s)/{1 - s) L 2 (u) and {36.3) may be written in the form
E
(Gf)( z) =
J H(s) f* (s)z1 -• ds. �� 21r1 dz 1 - s
(36.29)
(T
Applying now Parseval's relation, given in {1.116), in the space L 2 (0, oo) to the right-hand side of {36.29), and the translation relation {1 .97) for the G-function, in particular, leading to the relation {36.30) we arrive at the representation in (36.28) without difficulty. If 2signc• + sign (-y* - 1/2) > 0, then not only H(s)/(1 - s) L 2 (u) but also H(s) E L 2 (u) since H(s) = O(lsl --r* ). Therefore Parseval's relation can be applied to {36.3) immediately which yields (36.23). •
E
Remark 36.2.
Since, for example,
( I � I f(t)) (z) = G8�
(GA� I � I l(t)) (z) = L HI m ; z} and
L _, H - I m ; ., } - see (1.119)-( 1.121) - and the Meijer
G-function of the form (36.23) or (36.30) does not exist in the case m = n = 0 of the G-transform, then not every G-transform may be represented by (36.23) or (36.28). The cases 2signc* + sign -y• > 0 and 2signc• + sign -y• < 0 of the G-transform correspond to the direct and inverse classical integral convolution transforms and the cases 2signc* + sign-y• = 0, i.e., c* = -y• = 0, correspond to the Watson transform for q -::/; p ( see the books by Titchmarsh [1, Chapter 8] and M.M. Dzherbashyan [2, Chapter 2, Section 1]) or to the fractional-type integrals of imaginary order Ib� and Ii! for q = p. This can be seen in more detail in § 36.1. Thus the general approach to the theory of integral convolution transforms with homogeneous kernels is realized via the representation in the form {36.3).
36.3. Factorization of the G-transform We introduce the following definition.
We call any representation of the operator in (36.3) by a composition of other G-transforms with less indices of complexity - see Definition 36.2 - a factorization of the G-transform.
Definition 36.5.
The most simple G-transforms except the trivial one in {36.3) are those which have indices of complexity equal to 1 . They are connected with the Laplace transforms given in { 1 . 119)-{ 1.121) and are defined in the following way.
714
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
Definition 36.6.
The following transforms of a function f(z) 00
t f a = (I) e - (z: f t )± t f(t ) � ,
(36.31)
+ioo 1 -y f*(s)z - • ds, = 21ri j f(±a ± s) ioo
(36.32)
0
-y-
Re(s + a) � 0, with L {
Let G1 , . . . , G, be G-transforms such that transforms of their kernels H1 (s), . . . , H,( s) satisfy the condition
Theorem 36.5.
H1 (s)H2 (s) . . . H,(s) = H(s)
(36.33)
where H(s) has the form (36.9). Let also the transforms Gt , . . . , G, have indices of complexity less then G and let them have characteristics (ci , -yi ) , . . . , (ci , "Yi), respectively. Then if the condition in (36.19) holds the G-transform - see (36.3) in the space rot;,�(L) and L�c,-y) can be factorized via the transforms G� , . . . , G1 arranged in some order -
(36.34)
§ 36. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AS INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS
715
if and only if (it , . . . , i,) is a rearrangement of the numbers (1, 2, . . . , 1) such that the inequalities
(
2sign c +
t ci; ) + sign ( + J=tt 'Yi; ) � 0, 'Y
J= t
(36.35)
k = 1, 2, . . . , 1,
hold. For any group of transformations Gt , . . . , G, of the above form there always exists at least one rearrangement satisfying (36.35). Proof. The existence of G-transforms satisfying the condition in (36.3) is clear. For example, this condition holds if we set I = p + q and take f (bi + s), i = 1, 2, . . . , m , f (1 - ai - s), i = 1, 2, . . . , n, r- t (ai + s), i = n + 1, . . . , p, r- t ( 1 - bi - s), i = m + 1, . . . , q as the transforms of the kernels Ht (s), . . . , Hp+9(s) respectively, which yields the factorization via the direct and inverse modified Laplace transforms defined in (36.1) and (36.2) - see Remark 36.2. It is clear from (36.33) that the relations � ci. L..J 1
i= t
= c. ,
(36.36)
are true. Applying Theorem 36.3 I times in succession we easily obtain necessary and sufficient conditions given in (36.35) which guarantee the existence of the whole compositions ( Gi,. . . . Gi 2Gs1f)(z), k = 1, 2, . . . , I. These compositions belong to ( 1 ') the spaces rot;, \, ( L) or L c I"Y where c' = c + L ci . , 1' = 1 + L 1i. . Hence
I
2
k
j=t
J
k
j =t
J
+
+
by (36.36) we have that (G/)(z) E rot;+t · �"Y +"Y• (L) or (G/)(z) E Lc2 c • I"Y "Y • , c respectively for k = I. We show now the existence of the rearrangement (i t , . . . , i,) for which the conditions, given in (36.35), hold. For this purpose we choose the indices it , . . . , i, in the following way. Let it be the index of the largest number among ci . If there are several such ci , then we take it as the index of the largest number among the numbers 1i in the pairs ( c; , 1i ) where ci are the largest numbers and it is an arbitrary index i from this set if there are several such numbers 1i . Withdrawing the pair ( c; , 1i) with such indices we consider the rest of the pairs and choose the next index i2 and the corresponding pair among them in a similar way. As a result after such a choice we have the inequalities
j = 1, 2, . . . , I - 1.
(36.37)
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
716
We show that (36.35) follows from (36.37). We assume on the contrary that (36.35) is not true, for example, for k = 1 - 1: 2sign
(
) (
1- 1 l- 1 c + � ci; + sign 'Y + � 'Yi;
J =1
That is, the inequality
c + c;1 +
· · ·
c + c! +
· · ·
J =l
)
< 0.
{36.38)
+ ci1 _ 1 < 0
(36.39)
or ..
+ c!· · - · = 0 '
(36 .40)
'Y + ,.,; + . . . + 'Y�- 1 < 0 .
is true. According to (36.36) from (36. 19) we have that 2sign (c + c!It +
· · ·
+ c!11 1 ) + sign ( -vI + -v! lit +
-
· · ·
> 0' + -v� 111- 1 ) -
I.e.
c + c! + ..
or
c + ci1 + "'VI
· · ·
· · ·
+ c!· · - · + c!. , > 0
(36.41)
+ c;, _ 1 + ci, = 0,
(36.42)
. . . + "'V� + "'V� 111 > 111-1 + "'V� l it + -0
hold. If {36.39) and {36.41) or {36.39) and (36.42) or {36.40) and {36.41) hold simultaneously, then c;, > 0 and since c;1 � c;� � � c;, by construction then c + c;1 + + c;, _ 1 > 0 which contradicts (36.39) . Now we suppose that the system of conditions in (36.40) and (36.42) holds. Then c;, = 0 and 'Y� > 0. So it follows from (36.19) and (36.40) and the inequalities c;1 � c;� � � c;, = 0 that c;1 = ci� = = c;, = 0, c = 0, from (36.37) that 'Yi1 � � 'Yi, > 0 and from the condition 2sign c + sign 'Y � 0 that 'Y � 0. The latter contradicts (36.40) and therefore (36.38) is not true. Similarly one may prove that the inequalities in (36.35) hold for the values k = 1 - 2, . . . , 1. • · · ·
·
· ·
· ·
· · ·
· ·
·
·
36.4. Inversion of the G-transform Theorem 36.6.
G-transform
Let g (x)
E rot;�c• ,-y+-y• (L)
or g (x)
E L�+c* ,-y+-y* .
Then the
(36.43)
§ 36. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AS INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS
717
is the inverse of the G-transfonn defined in (36.3) with the notation (G/)(z) = g(z). If additionally the conditions of Theorem 36.5 are satisfied, then the inverse operator in (36.43) is factorized by the relation (36.44)
+
+
Since g rot;.t • 'l' +'l' (L�c c* ,-y -y* )), then by Theorem 36.2 the G-transform c, * in (36.43) exists and maps a function g into a function f in the space rot��(L�c,-y)). Applying now the G-transform in (36.3) to (36.43), evaluating the left composition directly, reducing all gamma-functions and using (36.3) we obtain the function g(z) on the left-hand side. The inverse G-transforms G-;:J 1 involved in (36.44) have the characteristics ( - ci; , --y;; ), j = 1, 2, . . . , I. Therefore the conditions in (36.35) with respect to (36.44) have the form
Proof.
E
I
I
i =k
i=k
• 2sign (c + c• - L ciJ + sign ("Y + -y - L "Yi;) � 0,
(36.45)
k = 1 , 2, . . . , I. It is clear that (36.45) and (36.35) coincide and hence Theorem 36.5 enables us to factorize the inverse operator (36.43) by (36.44) for the above rearrangement ( it , . . . , il ) · • Remark 36.3. If the characteristic (c, -y) of the space
the condition
I
rot�� (£) or L�c,-y) satisfies
I
(36.46) 2sign (c - E lei) + sign ("Y - L hi ) � 0 i= l i= l then the restrictions in (36.35) are true for all rearrangements and therefore the order of application of th-e operators Gi; in (36.34) and G� 1 in (36.44) may be arbitrary, i.e. these G-transforms are commutative in such a case. We consider the important case when all the Gi , i = 1, 2, . . . , I, are modified Laplace transforms as defined in (36.31) and (36.32). Applying the Mellin transform - see (1.112) - to these relations we see that the transforms of the kernels in (36.9) containing only one gamma-function in the numerator or in the denominator
r(±a ± s) r-·1 (±a ± s)
+-+
za A±z- a ,
+-+
za A±1 z- a ,
Re (a + s) � 0, Re (a + s) � 0,
(36.47) (36.48)
718
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
correspond to such operators. Hence each of the above Laplace transforms corresponds to one of the gamma-function in the G-transform (36.3). That is, this general G-transform can be factorized via the compositions of the operators 6 6 ,.. ; A+ z - ; ,
.._
j = 1, 2, . . . , m ;
z a; - 1 A _ z 1 - a; , - 1 ,.. ,..a; A+
.._
.._
-a; ,
j = 1, 2, . . . , n; . J = n + 1 , . . . , p ,·
z 6; - 1 A: 1 z 1 - 6; ,
(36.49)
j = m + 1 , . . . , q.
under certain conditions. By the symbols
we denote these operators respectively taken in indicated order. Their characteristics being evaluated by ( 36. 7) are equal to ( 1/2, -Re bi), j = 1 , 2, . . . , m , ( 1/2, Reaj ), j = 1 , 2, . . . , n, (- 1/2, Reaj } , j = n + 1, . . . , p, (-1/2, -Rebj ) , j = m + 1 , . . . , q respectively. We denote them by { fh ,6), . . . , (Op+ q , ep +q) in the indicated order. Theorems 36.5 and 36.6 can be formulated with respect to such a factorization in the following way. Theorem 36. 7.
Let the conditions in (36.19) and (36.22) and the inequalities
j = n + 1 , . . . ,p; (36.50) Rebi < 1/2, j = m + 1, . . . , q, hold. Then the G-transform defined in (36.3) can be factorized in the spaces rot��(L) and L�c,-y ) via a composition of modified Laplace transforms with power multipliers (36.49) applied in same order �eai > -1/2,
(36.51)
if and only if (i1 , , ip+q ) is a rearrangement of the numbers (1, 2, . . . ,p + q) such that the inequalities • • •
k
k
J=1
i=1
2sign (c + L (Ji; ) + sign (-y + E ei; ) � 0, k = 1, 2, . . . ,p + q,
hold.
(36.52)
§ 36. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AS INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS
719
rot;..t • ,"Y +"Y ( L) or L�+c* ,-y +-y* and the conditions c in (36.19), (36.22), (36.50) and (36.52) be* satisfied for a certain ream�ngement (it , . . . , ip+q) of the numbers (1, 2, . . . , p + q) . Then the G-transform defined in (36.43), inverse to (36.3), can be factorized via the operators A 1 , , Ap+f with the characteristics ((Jl , e1 ), . . . , ((Jp+q , eP+f) by the relation
Theorem 36.8.
Let g (z)
E
. • .
f(x) = (G- 1 g)(z) = ( A� 1 Ai./ . . . A��9g)(z).
( 36.53)
Remark 36.4. In the case of operators in (36.49) the transforms of the kernels
Ht (s), . . . , Hp+q(s) are single gamma-functions of the form r(bj + s), r(1 - Oj - s), r- 1 (aj + s) or r- 1 (1 - bi - s) respectively. We can combine these gammcrfunctions
into various groups by different methods, for example in pairs. As a result we can obtain many variants of composition expansions for the G-transform by using (36.34) , for example, via fractional integrals and derivatives, Hankel, and Stieltjes and Meijer transforms and their inversions. Remark 36.5. If the conditions in (36.22) or (36 .50) are violated for some indices j provided that (36.5) hold, then instead of the corresponding operators in (36.49) there arise operators such that in the kernels of the direct Laplace transforms r f _ ,,. the function e - z will be changed to e - z - L: �· For such indices j the
k=O
gamma-function corresponding to the image of the kernel can be changed by three gamma-functions by the formula
+ r(a + s) = ( - 1) i r(a k + s)r(1 - a - k - s) , f(1 - a - s)
(36.54)
-k < Re (a + s) < 1 - k. Under a suitable choice of k the condition violated for the latter will be now satisfied. But such an operation leads to an increase of the index of complexity of the G-transform. From what has been said above we conclude that the following statement holds which is important in the theory of integral transforms.
The G-transform and, in particular, the classic direct and inverse integral transforms of the convolution type is the composition of a certain number of direct and inverse Laplace transforms of the form (36.31) and (36.32), whose admissible order of application depends on the space of functions f and the parameters of the transforms. For sufficiently good function spaces of the type rot;,� (£) or L�c,-y) , with the condition, for example, 2c - p - q > 0, the operators
Theorem 36.9.
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
720
A1 ,
. • •
, Ap+q are commutative and their composition forms the G-transform defined
in (36.3).
36.5. The mapping properties, factorization and inversion of fractional integrals in the spaces rot�_; (L ) and L �c ,-r )
The fractional integro-differentiation operators z- a ( J�+ /)(z) and z -a (I�/)(z) of' an arbitrary complex order a are both defined in the spaces rota,� ,(L) and L�o ,-y ) with 1' = max(O, -Rea). These operators map the spaces rot;,�(L) and L�c ,-y) with 2sign c + sign (')' - i) � 0 isomorphically onto the spaces rot;,� '+ Re a (L) and L�c ,-r' + Re a) , respectively and they can be factorized via the composition of the. operators given in (36.31) and (36.32) by the following relations under the corresponding conditions indicated below Theorem 36.10.
c
•
(36.55)
if /(z) E rolO,� (L) or L �o,-r) and Re a > - 1/2; (36.56)
if /(z) E rol�/� ,- Re a (L) or L �l / 2 ,- Re a) and Re a > - 1/2; (36.57)
if /(z) E rolO,�(L) or L�O,-y) and k > -Rea - 1/2; (36.58)
if /(z) E rolO,�(L) or L�o ,-y) and Re a < 1/2; ( 36.59)
if /(z) E rot�/2 ,.., (L) or £�1 / 2,-y) and Re a < 1/2; ( 36.60 )
§ 36. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AS INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS
721
if f(x) E rota,;(L) or L�o.� ) and k - 1/2 < Rea < k + 1/2 .
Proof�
Let n be an integer such that Rea + n > 0. Then we have
� � J f*(s)IgJn x-' ds
= x-a d n i 2
q
d" a +n j [ 1-s - ' ds 21ri r 1 + a + n - s f* (s)-x dxn
1 = x -a _
]
q
=
f [ 1-s 21ri q r 1 + a - s I (s) X ds. 1
]
*
_,
( 36.61 )
All interchanges of the order of integration and differentiation that have been made in ( 36.61 ) are valid because of the absolute convergence of the integrals given above. The latter is true by l si - � F(s) E L(u) - see ( 36. 11 ) - or by Parseval's relation in the space L 2 (u) and l si -� F(s) E L2 (u). If now the transform of the kernel is written as the product r - 1 (1 + a - s) r ( 1 - s), then the factorizations in (36.55) and (36.56) with the corresponding conditions on the spaces and Re a are easily obtained as particular cases of Theorem 36.7. Let now a be an arbitrary complex number and k be a positive integer such that Rea + k + 1 / 2 > 0 . Then by (1.47) the product r - 1 ( 1 + a - s) r (1 - s) can also be written in the form
Now by the arguments given after Remark 36.3 and the relations 8, 1 4 and 12 in Brychkov, Glaeske and Marichev [ 1, p. 24], and also by the choice of k, the images ( 1 + a - s) k , r- 1 (1 + a + k - s) and r (1 - s ) correspond to the operators x -a (J!:) k x a+k , x - 1 - a - k A: 1 x1+a+k and x - 1 A_ z 1 the characteristics of which are (0, -k) , ( - 1 /2, Rea + k ) and ( 1 /2, 0) , respectively. Hence the factorization of the form ( 36.57) follows. The remaining relations are proved in the same way. The first statements of this theorem are the direct corollaries of Theorem 36.2. • Corollary 1.
Any function f(x) in the space rot;,�(L) or L�c.�) can be represented
722
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
in the form f(x) = x - -r IJ+ cp(x) where cp(x) E rot;,J(L) or cp(x) E L�c ,o), respectively. from the fact that x- -r Jti+ is the G-transform with the ) characteristic (0, -y and therefore it is an isomorphic mapping of the space rot;,�(L) or L�c,o), respectively onto the space rot;:�(L) or L�c ,-y ) provided that 2signc + sign 1 � 0.
The proof follows
If a = ifJ is a pure imaginary number then the operator I�� as an automorphism in the spaces rot;;�(L) and L�c,-y) . The proof follows directly from the fact that the operator z- iB I�� the
Corollary 2.
IS
G-transform with the characteristic (0, 0).
36.6. Other examples of factorizations This subsection deals with examples of factorizations in terms of fractional integrals of Hankel and Bessel transforms, generalized Laplace transforms and potential type integrals. For convenience we shall denote by { h(x) }cp the Mellin convolution in 00
( 1.114) and set {h(l/z)}cp = J h(tfx) cp(t)t - 1 dt. 0
The following statements are valid. Theorem 36.11.
The Hankel transform of modified form Re v > -1,
( 36.62 )
maps the spaces rot;;�(L) and L�c,-y) isomorphically onto itself and it can be. factorized as the composition ( 36.63 )
If additionally f(x) E rotl/� Re v/ 2 (L) or f(x) E L�/ 2 ,Re " / 2 (L), then the composition , in another order ( 36.64)
can be also admitted.
The proof follows from the fact that if Rev > - 1 , then the operator in ( 36.62)
§ 36. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AS INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS
723
admits the representation
f(
(
) (
{ Jv 2 Vx) }f = 2�i r s + v/2 r - 1 (T
1 + v/ 2 - s
)f* ( )x-• d
( 36.65)
s
s
according to the sixth relation given in ( 1 .118) and the Parseval relation - see So it is factorized via two operators x" / 2 A + x-"1 2 and x- l - v/ 2 A: 1 x 1 + " / 2 as seen in the arguments after Remark 36.3. Their characteristics are equal to ( 1 /2, Rev/2) and ( -1 /2, -Rev/2) , respectively. So applying Theorem 36.5 we obtain the conditions guaranteeing the existence of the compositions of these operators in one or another order as well as ( 36.63) and ( 36.64) themselves. •
( 1 . 1 16) .
Theorem 36.12.
The Bessel Y -transform of the modified form
j¥. (2/f) t(y)�, 00
{Y.(2v'x}}/ =
( 36.66)
IRe v l < 1 ,
0
()
where Yv z is the Bessel function of the second kind {Erdilyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi {e, 7.!.1]} maps the spaces rot;,�(£) and L�c,"'f) isomorphically onto itself and it can be factorized via the composition of the Hankel operators Jv = { Jv 2y'X)} and the fractional integrals or derivatives of the form K = x-"1 2 I: 1 '2 x( v +l)/ 2 and I = x - ( v +l)/ 2 I��2 x"l 2 • If c = 0 and v < 1 /2, then the operator Jv can be in any position and the operator K must be applied after I:
If 2sign c + sign
arbitrary.
(
(
( 36.67)
Yv = KIJ, = KJv i = J,KI. -y
- 1 /2)
� 0,
then the order of application of the operators
is
Proof.
In accordance with ( 1 . 1 16) and 9.4 ( 1 ) in the book by Marichev [ 10] we form the G-transform as
( GY f)( x) =
1 21r i
jr [s - ( (T
8 + v/ 2, 8 - v 1 2 v + 1 ) /2, ( 3 + v)/ 2 - s
] f* ( )x-•d 8
8"
( 36.68)
Its characteristic is equal to ( 0, 0 ) and so by Theorem 36.2 it exists in any spaces
rot;,�(£) and L�c,..,) and is an isomorphic mapping of this space onto itself. If additionally the conditions in ( 36.22) which have the form -1 < Re v < 1 are satisfied, then according to Theorem 36.3 the integral in ( 36.68) is transformed
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
724
into the integral in (36.6). Now we write the transform of the kernel in the form r
r
r
+1-s [ v/2s ++v1/2- s ] [ s -s(v- +v/21)/2 ] [ (3v/2+ v)/2 - s] ·
Using the second relation in ( 1 . 117) it is not difficult to establish the following Mellin correspondences
r r
[ db - s ] [ ad + s ] -
_
S
+-+
8
+-+
Z 1 - dzdO+- b Z b- 1 '
Re(a + s) > 0 ,
(36.69)
Re ( b
(36.70)
-
s) > 0 ,
(d- a - 1 )/2 z(a -d+l)/2 { Ja +d- 1 (2 V- fZ\} ., ) ... ""
'
( 36.71 )
Re(a + d), Re (a + s) > 0 , from (36.1), (36.2) and (36.65). Applying these relations to the above image of the kernel I it is easy to obtain the whole factorizations indicated in this theorem. The conditions on the characteristics of the spaces are deduced from Theorem 36.5. • Theorem 36. 13.
The Bessel H-transform of the modified form (36.72)
where H 11 (z) is the Struve function {Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Thcomi maps the spaces rot�;(L) and L�c,-y ) isomorphically onto itself and it can be factorized as the following compositions
[2, 7.5.4]}
11 {H11 (2 ..fi)} I = ( J11 )(z ( 11+ 1 )/2 r:. 11 2 I�!2 z- ( + 1 )/ 2 )/(z) , {H11 (2 y'Z) } I = z(ll+l)/2 1: 1 /2 z - 111 2 ( J11 )z ll/2 1!' 2 z- ( 11+ 1 )/2 /(z) ,
(36.73) (36.74) (36.75)
where /(z)
E rot- 1 (L)
rot0, � 1 2 ( L) or £ �· 11 2
or /(z) E L 2 (0 , oo) in the first two cases, and /(z) E in the third case. Moreover, the operators on the right-hand
§ 36. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AS INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS
725
sides of {36.73) and {36. 74) are commutative and the operator (J,) in {36.75) is commutative with the operators z( " + 1)/ 2 I: 1 '2 z - " /2 and z" /2 I!.' 2 z -( "+1 )/ 2 .
The proof is similar to that of Theorems 36.11 and 36.12 and is based on the representation of the transform {H,(2.Ji)} / in the form s v/2 s v { H (2VZ} }/ =� 21r1 /r [ 1 + +/2 - ] r [ + (+ +/21)/2 ] {36.76) 11
II
(7
S
S
II
provided that -2 < Rev < 0, which follows from 9.5(1) in the book of Marichev (10) . •
Theorem 36.14.
The generalized Laplace transform
{36.77) Rev < 1, where D,(z) is the parabolic cylinder function (Errlilyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi (2, 8.2]) maps the spaces rot;:� ( L) and L�e,"'f) isomorphically onto the spaces ftl) - 1 . the 1o� 11owang +1 2 Re 2 · 1y an d a·t a dmats . :JJ'-e+1 / 2 ,"'(-Re v / 2 (L) an d Le2 / ·"'�- "/ , respec tave composition expansions D,{f(y); z
} = z 1 /2I: "/2 z(v- 1 )/2A+ f(z),
D, {f(y); z } = A+ z 1 1 2 I: "'2 z<" -1)/ 2 f(z) ,
{36.78) {36.79)
where Rev < 0 and 2signc + sign('Y + {1 - Rev)/2) � 0 in the latter case.
Proof. In accordance with 8.30{1) in the book by Marichev (10) we consider the G-transform
(Gn /)(z) = 2�i j f [ � tl::. �)�2 ] r(s) :e- • ds. 8
{36.80)
(7
It has the characteristic {1/2, -Rev/2) and therefore exists in any space rot;:� (L)
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
726
,) , · or L (c ;,J"c-+l l/ 2,-y - Re " / 2 (L) or L(c2 + l/ 2 -y - Re "/ 2) by Theorem . . 2 -y and maps 1"t mto nn The reducibility of to follows from Theorems and and the factorization relations and follow from Theorem It is easy to formally write these relations on the basis of the correspondence
(36.80) (36.77) (36.78) (36.79)
D, r [ s s, (1s - 1/2v)/2 ] +-+
+
+
36 2
36.3 36.4 36.4.
=
r[s]r [ s +s(1+ -1/2v)/2 ]
(36.81)
The theorem is proved. • In the conclusion of this subsection we illustrate another proof, although formal, of the decomposition for the potential type integral in
(12.39)
(12.34)
00
1
la
X>
0
For any function
.,-"( I�
2.5(1)
0.
(36.82)
f E rot;,�(L) (L�c,-y) ) we have the representation
/)(z) = 2�i f r [ .- ;/;,o:i ! :i2-. ] f* (s)z -• ds,
(36.83)
tT
see in the book by Marichev obtain the following factorization
[10]. Using now (36.69) and (36.70) we easily (36.84)
where an arbitrary order can be admitted. The transform of the kernel may be decomposed into two fractions by another way which leads to the factorization via Hankel transform.
36 .7. Mapping properties of the G-transform on fractional integrals and derivatives Theorem 36.15.
Let the conditions 2sign ( c +
c* ) + sign ('r + i* + Re a) � 0, 2signc + sign ( i + Rea) � 0
(36.85)
§ 36. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AS INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS
727
hold. Then there exists the G-transform defined in (36.3) of the operator x- a (I�+ f)(x) in the spaces rot;,�(L) and L�c ,"'f) and it is evaluated from the relation (36.86) The
Gi 1 /
proof follows =
x- a l�+ f
from Theorem 36.5 where we have to set l = 2, and Gi1 / = Gf in (36.3) and take the G-transform
(a;:'+��� I (::) �l l I(t)) I
,
( " ) instead of that in ( 36.3).
Let the conditions of Theorem 36.15 be satisfied. Then there exists the G-transform defined in (36.3) of the function x- a (I�f)(x) in the spaces rot;,�(L) and L�c ,"'f) and it is evaluated from the relation Theorem 36.16.
(36.87) The
proof is similar to that of Theorem 36.15.
36.8. Index laws for fractional integrals and derivatives For fractional integrals and derivatives there are known the so-called index laws given by ( 10.4), ( 10.5), ( 10.42) and (10.43), see also Theorem 10.7. In this subsection we prove the theorem characterizing the conditions under which index law as well as the analogue of Theorem 10.7 for the operators I�+ and I� in the spaces rotO,; ( L) and L�o ,..., ) hold.
Let (a t , . . . ,an ) and ({Jt , . . . , fJn ) be two sets of arbitrary complex numbers. Then the operators zPi /�+-Pi x- a i are commutative in the space {f(x) : f(x) = x6 g(x), g(x) E rotO,; (L) or g(x) E L�o ,..., ) } with
Theorem 36.17.
1
i
= max { O, max Re L:
Moreover, if an addition
j=l
- CXi; ), { it , . . . , ii } C { 1 , 2, . . . , n } } ,
({Jt , . . . , Pn )
(36.88) (36.89)
is a certain rearrangement of the set
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
728
(nt, . . . , nn), then the composition of all these operators is an identity operator (36.90) If the conditions in (36.88) or (36.89) are not satisfied, then the above operators are not commutative.
f(x) = x6g(x) where g(x) E rot0,�(L) or L�O,-y ) be
Proof.
Let the representation true. Then by (36.10) we have
zPi1 ];�1 -Pi1 z-ai1 f(x) = zPi1 ];�1 -Pi1 2�i I g* (s)x6 -a i1 -• ds. tT
Since
Re(6 - ni1 - s) > -1 according (36.89), then for m > Re(,Bi1 - ni 1 ) we find
1 I r [ -1 .B-i1 -i1 s-+s 6++6 m ] g* (s) --x ern /3 Il =x�'� 1 1 211"i dxm 6 - i1 +m- ds Q
Ai
tT
-s+6 = 2?r1 i I f [ 11 -- ni1 ,Bi1 + 6 ] g* ( ) 6 _11 ds = cp( ) - S
X .
S X
tT
All transpositions of operators that have been carried out are valid since all integrals we have used converge absolutely or (according to Parseval 's relation) in L 2 , in view of the condition E L 2 (u) respectively. The constructed E L(u) or function belongs to the space E rot0 � , (L) or , ' o , > L� -r , where = t ) } . The conditions in (36.88) and (36.89) rewritten in the form
cp(x)
g*(s)s"Y
g*(s)s"Y {/(x) : f(x) = x6g(x), g(x)
1' 1 + Re(ni1 - ,Bi k
1* = max{ O, max Re L(,Bi; - ni;), {it , . . . , ik } C {1, 2 , . . j= t
6 > t
.
, n} \ i t } ,
§ 36. FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AS INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS
729
with respect to the parameter 1 ' are also satisfied. So we can apply operators of the type with i2 E 1 , . . . , n} \ i 1 to again. Continuing this procedure we obtain by Theorem 36.5 that the composition exists for any rearrangement (i 1 , . . . , in and moreover it is representable in the form of the G-transform
xP•� I;�� -P·� x- 01 ·� { (xP•,. I;�,. -Pi,. x-a ,,. ) . . . (zP•• I;�· - 13'• z- 01'• )f(x) ) �
J r [ 11 -- aPii,. ++ 66 -- s,s, .. .. .. ', 11 -- Paii.l ++ 66 -- ss ] g* (s)xcS- 6 ds � r [ 1 - a t + 6 - s, . . . ' 1 - an + 6 - s l * (s)x 6- s ds, = 21r1 J 1 - Pt + 6 - s, . . . , 1 - Pn + 6 - g 21rz
,.
u
(36.91)
S
u
see (10.48), and therefore it does not depend on other applications of composing operators. The change of this order leads to the change of the order of the gamma-multipliers in {36.91). If in addition . . . , Pn } = a 1 , . . . , an } , then all gamma-functions in (36.91) are cancelled and the right-hand side has the value which yields {36.90). Let now the conditions in (36.89) be broken, i.e. let there exists a number j such that 6 � Rea; - 1/2. At first let 6 < Re a; - 1/2. Then the operator E rotO,�(L) does not exist for the function = or L�o .� ) if e < Re a; - 1/2 - 6. Similarly, in the case 6 = Re a; - 1/2 the function can be found in the space indicated in the formulation of this theorem such that the above operator does not exist on this function. Finally we suppose that the condition in {36.88) is not satisfied for a certain
{Pl !
{
x6g(x)
f(x) x- 112+Ee - z
xPii;,t-P;x - 01if(x) f(x)
set (il l . . . , ik ) · Then by Theorem 36.5 the composition does not exist in the space rot0,�(L) or £�0·�>.
•
-P• j=lll (xP•; I;� ; x- 01'i )f(x)
Theorem 36.18. Let the conditions of Theorem 36.17 be satisfied except {36.89)
instead of which we assume the opposite inequality
6 < max Re ai - 1/2
l �j�n
{36.92)
to be hold. Then the statements of Theorem 36.17 with Io+ replaced by I_ are true.
The proof is similar to that of Theorem 36.17.
Corollary 1. Let 1 = max{ O, -Rea, -ReP, - Re a + and 6 > max( - Rea , - ReP) - 1/2, or 1 = max{ O, -Rea, -Re {a + P)) and 6 > -Rea - 1/2. Then the first and the second relations in {10.4) hold in the spaces = E rotO,�(L) } and = E L�o.�) } , respectively.
g(x)
{f(x) : f(x) x6g(x), g(x)
( P)) {f(x) : f(x) x6 g(x), .
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
730
The proof is obtained on the basis of the representation Z
-a- fJ zO+a lO+fJ !(Z ) = 21r1 i j r [ +p +p +1 -1 -s ·] r [ p +1 -1 -s ] /• ( ) -• d S
Q
(1
S
S Z
S.
1
Let = max(O,Ren,ReP,Re(n+P)) and 6 > max(Ren,ReP)-1/2. Then the relation
Corollary 2.
(36.93) holds in the spaceso {/(z) : /(z) = x6g(x), g(x) E VJtO,� (L) } and {/(z) : f(z) = x6g(x), g(x) E L� ,-y) } . The proof follows from Theorem 36.17 and Corollary 1. Corollary 3 . Let = max{ O , -Rea, Re(n + P)} and 6 > max( O , -Rep, -Re(n + P))-1/2. Then (10.42) holds in the spaces {/(z) : /(z) = x6g(x), g(x) E VJtO,�(L) } , o ) , and {/(z) : /(z) = x6g(x), g(x) E L� -y } . Proof. Taking the result n + P + = 0 into account we rewrite the left-hand side of (10.42) in the form 10..: - fJ xa +fJ x- fJ 1g+ x -a- {J 10+ xfJ f(x). This composition exists and has the value 1
1
�j r ( 1 + n + P - s] r (
211"1
(1
1-s
1-s ] 1+P- s 1 + p - s r ( 1 + + p s ] !• (s)x - 'ds = f(x) Q
-
provided that the conditions of the Corollary are satisfied. This completes the proof, cf. the proof of Theorem •
10.6.
§ 37. Equations with Non-Homogeneous Kernels In this section we consider some classes of integral equations of the first kind solvable in closed form, the kernels of which are not directly representable in the form These are equations in which the kernel is of the type and which takes the form 0), (J = y r , after the substitutions z = ln y and r, certain non-convolution equations with Bessel functions, equations of composition type decomposed into more simple invertible equations, and 4) also equations connected with the integration of special functions with respect to a parameter - Kontorovich-Lebedev and Mehler-Fock type transforms.
K(xft). t = ln (2)
(1) K(ln
f
K(x - t),
(3)
(
§ 37. EQUATIONS WITH NON-HOMOGENEOUS KERNELS
731
37. 1 . Equations with difference kernels
We investigate the following seven left-sided Abel-type integral operators
(A�+' /)(z) =
1� (z - t)a- 1 J-(a- 1)/2(l(z - t))f(t)dt, 1� (z - t)a- 1 -
(37.2)
r (a)
(I
a � /)(z) = ( Ba-t
(37.1)
Ja/2 - 1 ( l (z - t))f(t)dt,
r (a)
(37.3)
� 1 a ,� )( z) - (z - t) a - 1 1-a- 1 ( lv z - t)f(t)dt, ( Ca+ � 1 (z - t) a - 1 J- ( (z - t))f(t)dt, a (Da+� /)(z) al 1� (z (I
I
(I
=
(s:+ /)(z) =
(I
(37.5)
�(�;-• la- t (J,..j(z - t)(z - t + 7)/(t)dt, l arg "YI <
1� ( (I
(37.4)
r (a)
(I
(E';+A.� l)(z) =
�
r (a)
71',
)
(37.6)
z - t a- 1 f(t) dt
2sh -2
( 37.7)
r (a)
and the corresponding right-sided operators Ia,fJ ,- � Aa,� Ba,� ca,� Da,� ' E::..�,., and Sf obtained from (37.1)-(37.7) by replacing z - t by t - z and [a, z] by [z, b], b � _oo. In the case when b = +oo we shall use the index - instead of the symbol oo- for thea ( above operators - see, for example, ( 10.56). In the expressions given above Re a > 0), p, l and "Y are some complex parameters, 1F1 (a; c; z) is the confluent hypergeometric function defined in ( 1 .81) and J., (z) is the Bessel-Clifford function defined by /4) " J-., (z) = J.,- (t.z) = r( + 1) ( 2z ) _., J., (z) = � (( -z+21)�ck! (37.8) ' The function l., (z) will occur below as well. 6-
-
v
6- '
'
oo
v
6- ,
6-
'
6-
732
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
According to the obvious relation J,(O) = J,(O) = 1 we obtain
- Aaa+,O - Baa+,O - Daa+,O - caa+,O - JaOt+ · - Eaa+,o,,. laa+,{J ,O -
(37.9)
This allows us to consider the operators given in (37.1)-(37.6) and (37.7) taking the asymptotic estimate 2sh ( T/2) .- T as r --+ 0 into account - as certain generalizations of the fractional integration operators 1:+ . Proceeding from the representations of kernels of the above operators via series, and using Legendre's duplication formula given in (1.61) it is not difficult to write the following relations characterizing the structure of the operators in (37.1)-(37.4):
=
A aa+, >. -
_
1:+ (E - .\ 1�+ ) - P,
(37. 10)
� (a/2}1: ( - .\ 2 ) k 1aa++ 2k LJ k= k! O
(37.11)
(37. 12)
(37.13) where E is the identity operator. The sums in the middle parts of these relations are called the Neumann generalized series. Since the operators I!+ are bounded in Lp(a, b), p � 1, b < oo - see the proof of Theorem 2.6 - then these series may be summed for l.\1 < II I�+ II i !{ a b ) " After evaluating the sums one may omit , this restriction on .\ and on the sums in (37.10)-(37. 13), since the operators in (37. 1)-(37.4) are analytic functions with respect to .\. A similar approach can be applied to the operators in (37.5)-(37.7) and to the corresponding right-sided operators, but in the case when b = +oo we must be careful while using Neumann generalized series to take into account the asymptotic estimates of the special functions in the kernels at infinity.
§ 37. EQUATIONS WITH NON-HOMOGENEOUS KERNELS
733
We also note that from (37.10) and (10.58) the interesting operator relation (37. 14) follows where e± >.z denotes the operator of multiplication by the function e ± >.z see the relation after (18.77). On the basis of (37.10)-(37. 13) and the semigroup property in (2.65) it is easy to write the relations
-
(37. 15)
and similar expressions for the right-sided operators. From the connection of the operators in (37 .1 )-(37 .7) with fractional integrals noted in (37.9) we can conclude that the operators in (37.1)-(37.7) have the same range in L, ( a , b) as I:+ , i.e. the following statement is true.
Let -oo < a < b < oo, 0 < a < 1, 1 � p < oo. Then the operators in (37.1)-{37.7) are bounded from L, ( a , b) onto I:+ [L,(a, b)] C L, (a, b).
Theorem 37.1.
proof follows directly from the properties 1F1 (,B; a; O) = J., (O) = 1 , 2sh (T/2) T as T --+- 0 and Lemma 31.4. Comparing (37.1)-(37.7) with (1.122) it is easy to see that, if a = 0 or a > 0 and a function f(t) is defined to be zero on the interval 0 < t < a, then the operators in (37.1)-(37.7) can be written as the Laplace convolutions in (1.122). Then after evaluating the Laplace transforms of the kernels by the corresponding relation 6.10(5) in Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi [1) and 2.2. 12.8 (cases I; + 1 , I; +2 , I�), 2.12.9.3 if n = 0, 2. 12.11.5 and 2.4.10.4 in Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev [2) and [1] respectively, it is not difficult to obtain the following Laplace transforms of (37.1)-(37.7) by the convolution statement in ( 1 . 123):
The
,_
(LI�f· >. f)(p) = p-a (l - >.p- 1 ) - P(Lf)(p), (LA�+>. f)(p) = (p2 + >. 2 ) -a f2 (L/)(p),
Re >. > 0, Rep > 0;
(37.19)
Rep > lim >.!;
(37.20)
734
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
(LB;:._>"· /)(p) = p(p2 + A 2 ) -(a +1)/2 (Lf)(p), Rep > jlmAj; (37.21) (LC�f.>. /)(p) = p-a exp [-A2 /(4p)](Lf)(p), Rep > 0; (37.22) a (Lf)(p), Rep > IIm.\ l ; (LD�+A /)(p) = (37.23) + ,\ 2 + a- 1 e ((p - .jp2 + A 2 )-y/2] 2 xp , >. (LE�f. -y f)(p) = (L/)(p), 2 2 .jp2 + A2 p + .jp + A
C .j� ) ( )
+ (1 - o:)/2) (LS0a+ f)(p) = f{p f(p + (1 + o:)/2) (L/)(p),
Rep > jlmAI ;
(37.24)
2Rep > Reo: - 1.
(37.25)
-
Comparing the right-hand sides here with those of (37.10)-(37. 13) we observe that the first four relations are obtained from (37.10)-(37.13) by replacing I�+ by p- 1 see (7.14) . As before, from (37.19)-(37.25) we easily obtain the operator relations in the form (37.26) (37.27) (37.28)
Eaa,+>. ,-yD{Ja+, >. - Eaa++{J ,-y ·
(37.29)
in addition to (37.15)-(37. 18). We consider now the inversion problem for the operators in (37. 1)-(37.7). (37.19)-(37.25) show that the Laplace transforms (Lh)(p) of the kernels h(x) - see ( 1 . 1 19) - of (37.1)-(37.7) and the corresponding inverse values ((Lh)(p)] - 1 have the same form and differ from each other only by values of the parameters. In the simplest case of the fractional integration operator /�+ ' to which (Lh)(p) = p- a with the condition Reo: > 0 corresponds, this condition for the Laplace transform p0 of the kernel of the inverse operator Dg+ obliges us to represent p0 in the form p0 = pnp- (n -na) , where Re (n - o:) > 0, with the value pn corresponding to the operator {�) = D�+ - see ( 1 .124). Similar operations are to he carried out when inverting the operators in (37.1)-(37.7). Taking the above arguments into account we shall construct the solution of the equation (37.30)
§ 37. EQUATIONS WITH NON-HOMOGENEOUS KERNELS
735
Using (37.10), { 10.58), {10.59) and 6.3(7) in Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and 'I'ricomi (1] we formally arrive at the following representations for the solution of {37.30):
()
() ( )1 ()
- .!!._ l ]l+ m -a , -fJ , 'JI. .!!._ m ( z ) - dz o+ dz 9 d l 2: (z - t)l+m -a- 1 F ( -P; l + m - a ; �(z - t))g(m ) (t)dt = dz f{ l + m _ a) 1 1 (I
.!!__ 1 - dz R(z) '
(37.31)
/(z) = e"-2: I;_(e - "-2: I:+ a g(z),
(37.32)
/(z) = I�+ a e"-2: 1;_fe - "-2: g (z),
(37.33)
()
()
.!!_ m (e - "-2: g (z)). -a fJ-a,-'JI. __ ' J'+m , /(z) = e "-s .!!_ dz dz o+
(37.34)
Proceeding analogously from (37.20)-{37.25) we can formally write the following representations for the operators inverse to (37.2)-(37.7) :
/(z) ={ (A:.t"') - 1 g } (z) = (A;_;• "-g)(z) = (I;.i + � 2 ) 1 A!'J 2m -a, "-( r;.; + � 2 ) mg(z)
(
)1
' 2: (z - t)21+2m -a- 1 d2 (�(z - t)) (37.35) J = dz2 + �2 f{2l + 2m - a) l+m -(a+1 )/ 2 X
(: r
-
(I
.
+ �·
g(t)dt .
{ (B:l) -1 g } (z) = I�+ (A;;_; - 1 • "-g)(z),
( )1
(37.36)
d l 2: ( t)l+m-a- 1 )g(m ) (t)dt, l (� { ( C:.f.'J1. ) - 1 g } (z) = f(l + m a ) l+ m -a- 1 vz=1 dz (37 .37) 0
-
Z -
-
736
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
{ ( n:.;.� ) - 1 g}(z) = (n;;-; •� g} (z) =
2•
[ t. G ) n!:; a .�
I •
]
A;;-V !:; g (z),
k - 1 =::; Re a < k, k = 1, 2, . . . ,
(37.38)
{ (E:.f..\ '"Y ) - 1 g} (x) = (E!+ a , .\ , -"Y A;�·.\ g)(x) = (E!_; cr+1 , .\ , - ')' D;!·.\ A;�·.\g)(x),
k - 1 =::; Re a < k + 1, k = 1, 2, . . . , =
(37.39)
a+1 [San+- cr (Ia+ + ( 1-a 2 - - k) k Ia-+1 + -2-) k g] ( ) -1
X '
2k-- 2 =::; Re a < 2k, k = 1, 2, . . .
(37.40)
To justify these inversion relations we denote by R( x) the integral operator next after the signs ( d�) 1 in and and after the signs
(37.3 1), (37.34) (37.37) ( � + ,\2) 1 in (37.35) and (37.36). Then conditions for the invertibility of the operators in (37.1)-(37. 7) can be collected in the following general theorem. Theorem 37.2. Let 0 =::; a < x < b < oo in the equation [h * l](x) - see (1.122), let h be one of the operators defined in (37.1)�37.7), Re a > 0, let g be a given function on [a, b] and let I be an unknown function. We assume that l(x) = g(x) = 0 for 0 < x < a in the case a > 0. Then the solution I = h- 1 g of this equation exists and is unique in the space I E Lp (a, b), b < oo, if g(x) E I:+ (Lp(a ,b)) , p � 1. In the case when p = 1 this solution can be represented by the corresponding relations given in (37.3 1)�37.40) provided that the following additional conditions are satisfied: 1) 0 < Re a < I + m, l,m = 1,2, . . . , g E ACm ([a, b]), g(a) = g'(a) = · · · = m g ( - 1 ) (a) = 0, R E AC1([a, b]), and R(a) = R'(a) = · · · = R(1 - 1 >(a) = 0 for (37.31), only if g E ACm or R E AC1, then I = 0 or m = 0, for (37.31}; 2) 1 p < oo and Re/3 > 0 or Re/3 < 0 but g(x) is representable in the fonn g (x) = (I:+ p ,P)(x), ,P(x) E Lp (a, b), for (37.32); 3) 1 =::; p < oo and Re.(a - /3) > 0 or Re (a - {3) < 0 but g(x) = (1�+ 1/J)(x), ,P(x) E Lp (a, b), for (37.33); 4) the conditions similar kto+2those of 1} for (37.34)�37.37); k+ 5) 0 < Re a < k, g E AC ([a, b]) and g(a) = g'(a) = = g( 1 >(a) = 0 for (37.38); 6) 0 < Re a < k + 1, g E Ack+5([a, b]) and g(a) = g'(a) = . . · = g(k+4>(a) = 0 for (37.39); 7) 0 < Re a < 2k, g E AC2k ([a, b]) and g(a) = g'(a) = · · · = g(2k- 1) (a) = 0 for (37.40). =::;
·· ·
§ 37. EQUATIONS WITH NON-HOMOGENEOUS KERNELS
737
The follows from the existence, uniqueness and coincidence of the corresponding Laplace transforms of the equations and their inversions, and also from the existence of all given operators in the indicated spaces of functions and /. The condition E is obtained on the basis of Theorem 31.13 and the conditions 2) and 3) follow from Theorem 10.9 if we take into account the fact that for the existence of the corresponding fractional derivatives the condition E in the last subcases in 2) and 1) must be changed by the condition E or E The conditions of the = form = ··· = = 0 ensure the vanishing the terms outside of integrals when using ( 1 . 124). •
proof
g
g I:+ (L,(a,b))
g I:+ (L,(a, b)) g I:_;P [L,(a,b)] g J�+ [L,(a,b)]. g(a) g'(a) g(m- l ) (a)
Remark 37.1. According to (37.8) the replacement
A by iA in all relations of this
subsection for the operators defined in (37.2)-(37.6) is equivalent to replacing the functions I, and J, by each other. Remark 37.2. Making the reflection operation in all relations of this subsection, i.e. replacing x by x, and the corresponding changes in the functions f and
a+bthe corresponding relations and results concerning the g,. it is. not difficult to write . a,p, ). Aa, ). Ba, ). Ca , ). Da, ). Ea, ). ,-y , and sa m the case nght-s1ded operators I when b < oo. If b = oo, then such results are in general still valid under stronger 6_
6_ ,
,
6_ ,
6_ ,
6_ ,
6_
6_
conditions.
37.2. Generalized operators of Hankel and Erdelyi-Kober transforms The generalized operators of Hankel and Erdelyi-Kober transforms considered here will be used later in § 38 when considering certain types of dual integral equations. Generalized Erdelyi-Kober operators differ from the operators
J(x2 - t2 )"12J,(> ..jx2 - t2)
,P(x),
Rev > -1,
(37.41)
j (t2 - x2 )"12J,(A../t2 - x2)
Rev > - 1 ,
(37.42)
•
=
0
CX)
�
only by the weight factors. The operators in (37.41)-(37.42), in their turn are obtained from the operators C�+). and C�· ). - see (37.4) and the text below - by the changes a = v 1 and 2" + 1 tf(t 2 ) = A"
+
738
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
relations for (37.41) and (37.42) follow in the form
�
� J t(x2 - t2) -("+1)/ 2/_,_ 1 (,\ vfz2 - t2),P(t)dt
(37.43)
0
and
(37.44)
If
c
symbols I, and J, with each other, which is equivalent to replacing ,\ by i,\ in (37.41)-(37.44), then (37.41) and (37.43) are valid under the same conditions. However the conditions for the validity of (37.42) and (37.44) are changed since the integral in (37.42) must converge and the function I,(z) in the kernel bas an exponential growth at infinity. On the basis of (37.41) and (37.42) we introduce the following
generalized
Erdelyi-Kober operators
J� (TJ, o:)f(z) = 2 a ,\ 1 -a z - 2a- 2'1
f� t2'1+ 1 (z2 - t2)(a- 1)/2 Ja- 1 (,\ vfz2 - t2 )f(t)dt,
(37.45)
0
00
R� (TJ, o:)f(z) = 2 a ,\ 1 -a z 2'1
f t 1 - 2a-2'1 (t2 - z2 )(a- 1)/2 Ja- 1 (,\ vft2 - z2)f(t)dt,
(37.46)
�
0,
where o: > 1J > - 1/2. We also define the operators Ji� ( 7J , cr) and Ru(7J, o:) via the right-hand sides of (37.45) and (37.46) by replacing Ja- 1 by Ia- 1 · is defined by the relation
The generalized operator of Hankel transform X
00
f T1 -a- 2<7 (r2 - y2)<7 J2'l+a ( vf(z2 - a2 )(r2 - b2 ))f(r)dr. y
(37.47)
It is obvious that this operator is connected with Sf1 ,a, 2 given in ( 18 .19) by means of the relation s
s
( 0, o:,0, 0 ) = ( 0, o:,0, 00 ) = 1],
U
1],
s
f1 ,a, 2 .
(37.48)
§ 37. EQUATIONS WITH NON-HOMOGENEOUS KERNELS
739
We give formally, without indications of the space of functions some properties of the operators introduced above. As usual these properties can be checked by direct calculations for sufficiently good functions and then can be extended to functions in Lp . 1 . It is obvious that if A --+ 0, then the operators in (37.45) and (37.46) coincide with the Erdelyi-Kober operators ( 18.8):
Jo (TJ, a) = I, ,a , Ro (TJ, a) = K, ,a .
(37.49)
2 . On the basis of (18.1 1) we have
Jo (TJ, 0) = E, Ro (TJ, 0) = E.
(37.50)
3. Translation relations
J>t (TJ, a)z 2{j /(z) = z 2{j J>t (TJ + {3, a)/(z), R>t (TJ, a)z2{j /(z) = z 2{j R>t (TJ - {J , a)/(z),
(37.51) (37.52)
follow from (37.45) and (37.46) . 4. Evaluating the corresponding repeated integrals, using 2.15.35.2 with 2 6 + c2 = 1 in Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev [2], it is not difficult to prove the results (37.53)
Ru (TJ, a)R>t (TJ + a, {3) = R>t (TJ, a)Ri >t (TJ + a, {J) = K,,a+fj
(37.54)
provided that a > 0, {3 > 0 - see (37. 18). 5. Taking the last relations into account and using (37.50) we can define the operators J>t (TJ, a) and R>t (TJ, a) for a < 0 via solving the corresponding integral equations (see § 18.1) that is . (37.55) (37.56)
740
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
where -n < a < 0, n = 1, 2, . . . . Hence we deduce the relations
Ji).1 (TJ , a) = J.x (TJ + a , -a) , JA" 1 (TJ , a) = Ji>. ( TJ + a , -a). Ri.x1 (TJ , a) = R.x (TJ + a , -a) , RA" 1 (TJ , a) = Ri>. (TJ + a , -a).
(37.57) (37.58)
6. For the operators in (37.45) and (37.46) the following analogue of the formula for integration by parts 00
00
J xf(x)J>.(TJ, a)g(x)dx = J xg(x)R>. (TJ, a)f(x)dx
(37.59)
0
0
is valid . 7. By calculating the compositions of the operators in terms of the relations 2. 12.35.2 and 2.12.35.6 in Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev [2] the following operator relations
Jo,('J + a , fJ)S
( O,
( 1'
0, ,\ , a , (T ,.,
) = s ( 0,, ,.,
) ( A , ,\ {3, ) s ("·, a , U - TJ - a ) = h (q, a + {J) , ) s ( '1 +,\,a , {3, 'I + ) = R;� ('J, + •>+
0, ,\ R� ('J, a)S '1 a {3, = s 0, a +A , {3, , ,., ,
( s ( o, ,
s '1 +o , a , ,.,
t ) ) 'I + tOt +
A, a + /3, .,. - 'I - Ot + fJ)/2 ,(37.60)
(T
,.,
(T
0, 0
0
0,
0,
a, 0
fJ)/2
/2
0 + fJ/2 CJt
CJt
, (37.61) (37.62)
fJ). (37.63)
can be proved, which connect the operators in (37.45)-(37.47) with each other. 8. Using (37.62) with a + f3 = 0 we can deduce that the equation
(
)
S 0TJ ' ay , uy f(x) = g(x) , , has the solution
(
0, f(x) = s TJ +y, a -a , ,
� ) 9 (")
(37.64)
(37.65)
§ 37. EQUATIONS WITH NON-HOMOGENEOUS KERNELS
741
from whence the operator relation s- 1
( o,
y, Y
a,
TJ ,
follows.
u
)=
s
( +y,a, fJ
0,
-a,
�)
(37.66)
37.3. Non-convolution operators with Bessel functions in kernels In this subsection we consider two following non-convolution operators with Bessel functions in kernels: z: -+ a- 1 ( Ja ,>. f)(x) = J (x -r (t)a) Ja- 1 ( >-. .jt(x - t))f(t)dt,
0
(I-a-, >. f)(x) =
z:
(x -r t) a - 1 I- ( .jx(x - t))f(t)dt, J (a) a- 1 >-. 0
(37.67) (37.68) (37.8). (37.68)
where l11(z) and l11 ( z ) are the Bessel-Clifford functions defined in We shall also deal later with the operators differing from and by the replacement of the symbols J and l by l and J, respectively. We shall denote these operators by l;t >. and J;, >. . It is obvious that
(37.67)
(37.69) All the above operators coincide with the fractional integral
a ja+,O - ja+,O - j-a ,O - j-a ,O - zO+
(37.70)
in the case ).. = while for other values of ).. they are also closely connected with the fractional integral, being compositions of the operators Jt>. or It>. with 1g; 1 in one or another order. These properties are consequences of the foilowing statement.
0,
Let Rea > 0 and f E L,(O , b) , b > oo, p � 1 . Then the operators introduced in (37.67) and (37.68) are defined and are bounded from L,(O, b) onto
Theorem 37.3.
742
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
the space I0+ [Lp(O, b)]. If also Re ,B > 0, then the following composition relations (37.71) (37.72) hold. The first statement follows immediately from Lemma 31.4 . (37. 71) and (37.72) are proved by direct evaluation, which will be shown, for example, for (37.72):
Proof.
J z
0
(z - t) a - 1 r (a) Ia - 1 ( >.. .jz(z -
t
-1 t))dt J (t -r(r)P ,B) f(r)dr 0
- J f(r)dr J(z - t)a- 1 (t - r)P- 1 l-a_1 (J.. Vz(z - t))dt . z
-
0
z
f (a) r (,B)
r
(37.8) 2] (37.72). (37.71) (37.72) (37.55) (37.56).
2.15.2.6
Changing the variable t = z + (r - z)02 and taking and the relation in Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev [ into account we easily obtain the value of the inner integral and thereby the right-hand side of • It is important to note that and enable us to define the operators 1:, >. and I; >. for negative values of a by the method which has already , been applied in § and in the definitions in and Namely, we set
18.1
(37.73)
( i;,>./)(z) = (J;+n, >.J
5 1 - n, n = 1, 2, . . . We also note that (37.71) and (37.72) yield the representations -n
< Re a
(Ja+, >.f)(z) = Ioa+- 1 (J-1+,>./)(z), ( I;, >./)(z) = ( il,>. I�_; 1 /)(z),
(37.74) (37.75) {37.76)
which characterize an important role of the operators J-1+, >. and Il, >. in the
§ 37. EQUATIONS WITH NON-HOMOGENEOUS KERNELS
743
investigation of (37.67) and (37.68) with an arbitrary a. The following statements contain the conditions for the validity of (37.73)-(37.76).
Let f E AC(n- 1 ) ((0, b]), n = 1 + (-Rea] and Rea < 0. Then the constructions in (37.73) and (37.74) exist. Theorem 37.5. Let f E Lp(O, b), b < oo, and p � 1 . Then (37.75) as true fora Re a > 0 while (37.76) is valid for Re a > 1 or for 0 < Re a � 1 if f E I�_; [Lp (O, b)].
Theorem 37.4.
of these theorems are obvious and follow from the connection of the operators in (37.67) and (37.68) with the fractional integrals mentioned above in (37.71) and (37.72). Now we consider the inversion problem for the operators in (37.67) and (37.68). As it follows from (37.75) and (37.76) this problem is reduced to the inversion problem for the operators J{>. and 11>. . To solve the latter we prove the following auxiliary statement.
The proof
'
Lemma 37 .1.
'
The identity (37.77)
is valid. We denote by A the left-hand side of (37.77) and expand the Bessel functions in the integrand in series with summation over k and I, respectively. Differentiating these series with respect to T and replacing I by k 0 � � k, we obtain
Proof.
m,
A _ _ � � ( -1) - L:' �
l:- O m - 1
m m(�2t/4)m (k - m)(�2 z/4)l:-m fz: (m!)2 ({/c m)!)2 _
( _
T T
m
t )m - 1 ( _ ) l: -m- 1 d Z
T
T.
f
We evaluate the inner integral by the relation 2.2.6.11 in the hand-book by Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev (1] which yields the value
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
744
It follows from 4.2.3.1 and 4.2.3. 18 in the cited hand-book that the finite sum is equal to -tkzl: - kz( -t) i . Hence we derive the right-hand side of (37.77). • Theorem 37.6.
!
Let F(z) E AC([O, b]). Then the equation
( Jt>. f)(z) = f(z) +
j f(t) :z Jo ("A.jt(z - t))dt = F(z) :r:
(37.78)
0
has a unique solution of the form
f(z) = z - 1 li:>- (zF(z))' = F(z) - z - 1
J0 F(r)r:T I0("A .jz(z - r))dr. :r:
(37.79)
Proof. Replacing z by T in (37.78) , multiplying both sides of these equation by
and then integrating with respect to T from 0 to z we have
J0 f(r)r:T lo ("A .jz(z - r))dr J0 T:T lo ("A.jz(z - r))dr :r:
:r:
+
x
j f(t) :T Jo (>.,/t(r - t))dt j F( r)r:T 10( >.,/:t(:t - r))dr. T
:r:
=
0
0
To evaluate the inner integral we interchange the order of integration in the second term on the left-hand side and use Lemma 37.1. As a result we arrive at the relation
J0 f(t) :z Jo ("A.jt(z - t))dt J0 F(r)r:T Io ("A.jx(z - r))dr. :r:
:r:
z
(37.80)
=
Now it is easy to obtain (37.79) by subtracting (37.80) from (37.78).
•
Let 0 < Re a < 1, g E llf [L (0, b)] and g(O) = 0 . The operator inverse to (37.67) exists on such functions+g(z)1 and can be represented in both of
Theorem 37. 7.
§ 37. EQUATIONS WITH NON-HOMOGENEOUS KERNELS
745
the following forms: :1:
{ Jt. � ) - 1 g(x) = x - 1
j Io (>.. y'x(x - t))d[t{J0+g)(t)],
{37.81)
0
(Jt, � ) -l g(x) = x - l (f1-a ,�
(37.81)
(37.82)
(1 - a)g(x). {37.75), (37.78)
Proof. follows directly from the relations and applied to the equation { Jt � /)(x) = g(x). To obtain the representation in ' we introduce the notation
(37.79) (37.82) {37.83)
(37.76) (37.81). (37.82)
(37.81) {1 {37.83)
and apply to Then the right-hand side of has the 1 form x - (11 a �
(10.12)
{37.84) =
{1 - a)g(x) + xg'(x)
provided that g(x) is sufficiently smooth. The latter relation can be obviously extended to the function g(x) E •
Jg+ (L 1 {0,b)). Theorem 37.8. Let 0 < Re a < 1, x - 1 h(x) E £ 1 {0, b) and h(x) E Jg+ (L t { O , b)). Then the operator inverse to {37.68) exists on such functions h(x) and can be represented in the form {37.85) {37.67), {37.68), {37.81)
37.7
proof follows directly from and Theorem after replacing xa (x 1 -a g(x)))' by f(x), xf(x) by h(x) and a by 1 - a. The conditions for
The
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
746
h(z) ensure the existence of the operator inverse to (37.68) and its representation by the form (37.85). • 37.4. Equations of compositional type In a series of problems of mathematical physics one sometimes meets integral operators, generating integral equations of the first kind with Volterra kernels, such that they may be represented as compositions of more simple invertible operators. We call these equations of a compositional type. Some typical examples of such equations are considered in this subsection. A.
If we
set z = y and denote u(y, y) = cp(2y) and change the variables (1 + 8)y = t,
2y = z, r(t)t#'+P - 1 = f(t),
( 2 ) 1 - #£ - 2p cp(z) 13 ; 1
= g(z )r(p)
(37.86)
in the solution (40. 2 8 ) of the hyperbolic equation in (40.19), then we arrive at the integral relation
z - t .\ t(z - t) ) f(t)dt = g(z) , I (z -r(t)Pp) - .:.....2 (JJ , 1 - p; p; � 4 �
1
2
(37.87)
0
involving the Humbert function defined in (40.2 5 ) in the kernel. The inversion formula for this relation can be obtained by two methods. One is by considering the solution of other boundary value problem for the corresponding hyperbolic equation ( 40.19). The other is by studying the structure of the operator in (37.87). We shall illustrate both ways. To use the first we consider the second Cauchy-Goursat boundary value problem with the conditions
u(z, z) = cp(2z), u11(z, O) = 0
(37.88)
for (40.19). We stress that the function in ( 40. 2 8 ) satisfies the condition u11 (z, O) = 0 provided that a constant is given by ( 40.31). According to the papers by Kapilevich [1; (5.1 ) , (5.3)] and Gordeev [1] the solution of the second Cauchy-Goursat problem has the form
747
§ 37. EQUATIONS WITH NON-HOMOGENEOUS KERNELS
u(z, y) =
�-
y
J [
+
(37.89)
�+ 11
[
where fl and R are the Green-Hadamard and Riemann functions respectively for (40.19). Their explicit representations via triple series were given by Kapilevich [3, p. 148 1]. Setting y = 0 in (37.89) and taking the condition u(z, 0) = T (z) into account we arrive at the relation y
�
T(z) =
j [
(37.90)
0
The kernel of this equation can be easily obtained from (5.31a) in Kapilevich [1] :
�R R H(x, 0, 71, 71) = x2 2P z - P 7JP +2P R1 2P B2 (JJ, 1 - JJ; 1 - p; - � ' -T), 2z 2
ic
2 2
1 - 2p �= = f 2 f -li ), p < 1. ( 1 - p) (p + 1/2) ' R z(z - 2 7]
(37.91)
Substituting {37.91) into (37.90) and using the changes in {37.86) we obtain the relation �
j
/(z) = 22P- 1 laicf (p)z - 1 [(g(t)t 1 - 2P- P)� + (1-' + p)t - 1 g(t)t 1 - P - 2P] 0
Hence taking the values ic and 13 from (40.31) into account we find finally the inversion formula for {37.87) in the form 1
/(z) = ;
t - z �2 z (t - z)) d(t 1 _P g(t)), j tP (fx(-l -t)p)-P .....::...2 (JJ, 1 - JJ; 1 - p; 2t '4 �
0
O < p < l.
(37.92)
The functions g and f in these relations must naturally be such that the integrals
748
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
t2-�'g(t) --+-
t�' t
tf(t) --+-
here exist. For this the conditions + 1 g ( ) --+- 0, 0 and 0 as 1 0 and the condition g E AC ([0, b]) are sufficient. The fact that (37.92) really inverts (37.87) follows from the uniqueness theorems for the solution of the initial Cauchy problem and the second Cauchy Goursat problem for ( 40.19) with � = ib, b > 0. The result obtained coincides with the known inversion relations in special cases, below. 1 . If � = 0, then (37.87) and (37.92) according to (40.25) and ( 1.80) have the form
t --+-
z
j(x2 - t 2 )(p- t )J• p�;• ( ;) f(t) dt = g(x),
(37.93)
0
f(x) � J tP (x2 -t2 ) -PI2 z
=
0
P�,
(-i ) d(t1 -Pg(t)).
(37.94)
The latter relation can be also rewritten by taking out the derivative of the integral
(37.95) z
=
:x j(x2 - t2) -p/2 P�, (T) g(t)dt. 0
(37.93) and (37.95) are the special cases of (35. 16) and (35.31) for e = 0 and n = 1, respectively. 2. If � = JJ = 0, then (37.87) and {37.92) become the reciprocal relations and = (Jb+ /) { z) = 3. If JJ = 0, then in accordance with (40.25) and (37.8), (37.87) and (37.92) can be rewritten in the form of the relations and = /(z) = where = + {1 cf. (37.67}, (37.82} and (37.69}. We consider the structure of the operator in (37.87}. For this purpose taking
g(x) /(z) d� I�+P g (x).
z- 1 (J1-p,>..
cpt (z) xg'(x)
(J:,>.. /)(z) g (x) p)g(z),
§ 37. EQUATIONS WITH NON-HOMOGENEOUS KERNELS
749
(18.41) into account we evaluate the composition
X
11
J (y -r(a)t) a- 1 l_a- 1 (). Jt(y - t))f(t)dt
[ ( ).2 ) i 2 t& f(t)tk dt ] I r(p)r( ) 4 (a: 0
00
=
{;
hl:!
X
J(z2 tl:
_
a:
0
y2 )p - 1 (y t) k +a - 1 dy _
t
=[E . . . ](z t)P +i + or - 1 (z + t)P- 1 _
=[E . . . ](z - t)P+k + or - 1 (z + t)P - 1 f(p)f(k + a)
r(p + a + k)
(
-z x 2 F1 1 - p, a + k;p + a + k; tt + z
--
)
)
(
z-t x 2 F1 1 - p, p; p + a + k; 2;"" dt =2(2z)P - 1
tl:
J
(z - t)P +a- 1
r(p + a)
0
z - t ).2 x 82 p, 1 - p;p + a; 2;"" 4 t(z - t) f(t)dt
(
'
)
(37.96) provided that
Rep > 0.
Thus we arrive at the operator which differs from (37.87)
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
750
by a change of variable only. Hence (37 .87)
in
the form
z (x - t)P - 1 ,..... ( t ..\2 p, 1 - p; p; � , 4 t(x - t) ) f(t)dt .::. 2 J f(p) X-
0
(37.97)
..\ =
follows. In particular, in the case 0 we obtain from (37 .97) the following compositional representation for the operator in (37.93)
J (x2 - t2 )(p- l)/• G) f(t)dt = (2x)1 - P I�+ ;•' (2x) - 1 IK+P f(x). :1:
P��·
0
(37.98)
)
This relation conforms to (35. 16) and (35.30 if we take the operator equality into account. The following statement is a consequence of the above arguments.
10;;z'l!J+ = (2x) - 1
Let Rep > 0, g(x) E AC1 ([0, b]), b < oo, and t�' + 1 g(t) � 0 and t 2 - �'g(t) as t � 0. Then (37.87) is invertible by (37.92) in the space of functions f(x) E AC((O,b)), b < oo, such that tf(t) � 0 as t � 0. Theorem 37.9. �0
We also note that under the appropriate conditions by using (37 .82) the solution of (37.87) can be represented in the compositional form
f(x) = x - 1 (11+, -p ,>. cp)(x), cp(x) = 2�' xP - I' dxd [x2+1' -P I�.r':z2x�' - 1 g(x)].
(37.99)
B . Now we consider the integral equation
z (x - t)'Y - 1 ...... ( t r( "Y) .::. 1 a, a , ,B; ...,. ; 1 - ; , .A (x - t)) f(t)dt = g(x), J 1
0
(37. 100)
where " 'k '
(a)"Y;)( a ) (.B); xi yA: , x )= � L...J j, A: =O ( J· + kJ· .
.::. 1 (a, a1 , ,B; "'( ; , y
......
1
t
lxl < 1 ,
(37. 101)
§ 37. EQUATIONS WITH NON-HOMOGENEOUS KERNELS
751
is one of the Humbert functions (see Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi We shall investigate this equation in the space of functions = {I : t O, , < oo } . The following statement is true.
[1; 5.7(25)]). q Qq l(x)x E L ( b) b Theorem 37.10. The integral equation in (37.100) has the solution I E Qq, q < min(O, Re (-y - a - /3)), and q � 0 when Re(-y - a - /3) > 0, if and only if g(x) E Iri+ (Qq ). This condition being satisfied the equation has a unique solution. If also min(Rea', Re(-y - a), Re (-y - ,8)) > 0, then the solution of (37.100) can be represented in the form (37.102) (37.101) [1]
2.10(1)
2.10(12)
Proof. It follows from and and in Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi that the function defined in has the following asymptotic expansions
x,
Bt(a, a', /3; -y; y) =
{ 0((1O( (1- xpx)),-a-P), ln -
0(1),
(37.101)
Re(-y - a - f3) < "Y - a - ,8 = 0, Re(-y - a - ,8) >
0, 0,
(37.103)
x --+ 1. 9Hence we obtainq that the integrand in (37 .100) can be rewritten as qt l(t)[O(t - ) + O(fY -a-P - )] for t --+ 0 which guarantees the existence of this integral. Applying now Lemma 31.4 in this case when p = 1 relative to the space Qq we obtain that g E Iri+ (Q q) if I E Qq. The inverse assertion follows from Lemma 31.4 as well. Let now E Iri+ ( Q q) and let the conditions of the second part of theorem ' be satisfied. Then by Theorem 10.9 the operator IJ+ a, a , >.. defined in (10.55) ' transforms the function I E Q9 into (Ici+ a, a , >.. l)(x) E Iri+ 0(Q9). This means that ' x-P(Ici+ a,a ,>.. l)(x) E Lt(O, b), and so the operator IgJ", Rea + n > 0, can be ' , a a , applied to the latter function. Considering IgJ"x P(Ici+ >..l)(x) as a repeated as
g
integral, changing the order of integration and using the integral representation
x,
Bt(a, a', f3; -y; y) X
tFt(a'; -y - a; y(1 - u))du,
Rea > 0, Re (-y - a) > O, x ft [1, oo),
752
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
for the function 8 1 we obtain
:r: (z_.. -__t)__...; "Y+_n- 1 + ',� laO+ n z-P (f!-a, O+ a J)(z) z-P J ..:. r(-y + n) _ 0 8 1 (o + n, a', {J ; -y + n ; 1 - t/z, �(z - t))f(t)dt. =
x
(37.104)
On the basis of (37.103) and (37.104) we can conclude that and hence E E Therefore both sides in (37. 104) can be differentiated n times which yields the relation
zP I�J" z-P I�J" z -P(IJ+ a,a' .� /)(z) IJ:n -P (Lt ).
(IJ+ a ,a' ,� /)(z) IJ:"(Q9)
:r: (z - tp- 1 � ' a laO+ z -P ( f!-a . P , O+ J)(z) z J r(-y) 0 =
(37.105 ) Finally, taking ( 10.58 ) into account we arrive at the following compositional representation for (37.100 ) :
:r: (z - tp- 1 .... ( J r(-y) .:.1 o , o', {J; -y ; 1 - ;t , �(z - t)) f(t)dt 0 zp 10+a z-P 10TY+-a� a' e�:r: lao+' e - �:r: J(z) g (z) . =
=
Inverting now each operator in this composition we obtain ( 37.102 ) .
•
( 37.106 )
37.5. The W-transform and its inversion
W
In this subsection we consider some properties of the s
The W-transfonn of a function f(z) is defined by the integral
§ 37. EQUATIONS WITH NON-HOMOGENEOUS KERNELS
=
2�i j f[v - iz - s, v + iz - s] 1 - (an ) - s r [ (,Bm ) + s, ( a; + 1 ) + s, 1 - ( ,a;- + 1 ) - s ] I* ( 1 - s) ds ,
753
q
X
(37.107)
where v (Rev > 1/2) and components of the vectors (ap ) and (,89) - see explanation to (36.3) - are complex parameters satisfying the conditions in (36.5), f*(s) is the Mellin transform of a function f(z) and is the contour = {s , Re s = 1/2 } . u
It is obvious that the following relation
u
(37.108) with fl (y) = y- 1 /(y- 1 ) which connects G- and W-transforms is valid - see (36.3). Definition 37.2.
The transforms 00
(37.109)
Ki�{f(t) } = j Ki� (t)f(t)dt, 0
00
Ki-;1 {g (t) } = --i--z j t sh 7rtKit (z)g(t)dt, 1r
(37.110)
0
where K (t) is the Mcdonald function - see (1.85) - with an imaginary index v = iz arei� called direct and inverse Kontorovich-Lebedev transforms, respectively. The formulations and proofs of the following theorems use the terminology of § 36. Theorem 37.11. The W -transform defined in (37. 1 07) with the characteristic (c* + 1, -y• - 2Rev + 2) where Rev > 1/2 exists on functions in the space rot;;�(L) if and only if
c 1) + sign ( + -y• - 2Rev + 2) � 0.
2sign(c* + +
36.2 (c* 1, -y• - 2Rev 2).
'Y
(37.108) 1
(37.111)
follows from Theorem since according to the W-transform can be considering as the G-transform evaluated at the point and having the characteristic + + •
The proof
754
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
Let the conditions in {36.22) and the inequality
Theorem 37.12.
{37.112) 4sign(c* + 1) + 2sign(-y* - 2Rev + 2) + sign 1 2 + p - q l > 0 hold. Then the W-transform defined in {37.107) exists on functions in the space rot- 1 (L) and can be represented in the form (W/)(z) = I c;'+�!2 (t � 1 - " + iz , �P�)" - iz, (a, ) ) t(t)dt. 00
0
{37.113)
37.11 into account, we see 36.3. Theorem 37.13. Let the conditions in (36.19) and in (37.111) hold. Then the W transform can be represented on functions in the space rot;,�(L) as compositions of the G-transform, defined in {36.3) with the direct Kontorovich-Lebedev transform, defined in (37 .109) by the relation
If we take the arguments in the proof of Theorem that the proof follows from Theorem
{37.114) - see ft (Y) in {37.108). 37.11
Proof. It follows from Theorem that the W-transform exists on functions in the space under the conditions of this theorem. We take in Marichev into account and rewrite it in the form
[10]
rot;,�(L)
9.3(1)
00
�r[v - ix - s, v + ix - s] = I K2iz(2-JY)y" - ' - 1 dy. 0
{37.115)
{37.107) to s- ] I* { 1 - s) ds ( an +) + l ) + s, 1 - (,a;n l ( Wf)( X) = 21r1 i I r [ (a;(,Bm) ) s + s, 1 -
This enables us to transform
q
00
X
2 I K2iz(2-JY)y"- ' - 1 dy. 0
(37.116)
§ 37. EQUATIONS WITH NON-HOMOGENEOUS KERNELS
755
The condition in (36.19) allows us to interchange the order of integration in {37. 116) by Fubini's theorem - see Theorem 1.1. This easily yields the representation {37.114) after changing the variable 2,fY = t and using {36.3). •
Let f(x) E rot- 1 (L). Then the Kontorovich-Lebedev transform, defined in {37.109) has the following compositional representation in terms of two direct modified Laplace transforms and the inverse Laplace transforms, defined in {36.31) and {36.32) and {1.1 19), respectively
Theorem 37.14.
{37. 117)
Proof. The integral representation for the Mcdonald function
Ki� (t) =
00
j e-tchu
cos uxdu
{37.1 18)
0
- see Prudnikov, Brychkov and Marichev [1; 2.4.18.4] - enables us to write {37.109) in the form
Ki� {f(t) } =
00
00
0
0
j f(t)dt j e-tch u
Since /{t) E rot- 1 (L), then the estimate
00
cos uxdu.
{37. 1 19)
00
� j dt j F(s)t -' ds j e-tch u cos uxdu
I Ka�{/(t)} l = 2
0
(1
00 00
0
� j IF(s) l ds j j e -tch ut - 1 1 2dtdu 00 -J-idu 1 1 = F( s) I ds JcliU < +oo 211' J I �
2
(1
0 0
(1
0
follows from {37.119). This allows us to change the order of integration in {37.119):
Ka�{ f(t) } =
00
j 0
00 cos uxdu j e- tch u f(t)dt. 0
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
756
Making the change of variable u 2 .../11 and replacing by ../i and using the factorization of the cosine Fourier transform which is obtained from (36.62) 2 we arrive at if we take the relation and (36.63) when into account. • 2/(rz) cos z J
= /
J_ 1 /2(z) =
z
v = -1/
Theorem 37.15.
(37.117)
Let f E rot;,�(L), 1 /2 < Rev < 3/4 and the inequality 2sign (c
+ c* ) + sign (-y + -y - 1/4) � 0 •
(37. 120)
hold. Then the inverse W-transform operator ((W/)(z) = g(z)) defined in (37.107) has the form
1
+ 1) , -(an ) �Y-3/2+v K - 1 {g ( �) }) (z). (37.121) ; /(z) = !2 (cp,q-qm,p- n � --(a ';' 2i..Jli; 2 (/3 + ), -(/3m ) If also q-m-n > m + n - p, Re /3j < 1/4, j = m+ 1, . . . ,q, ze2"'z g(z) E L 1 (0, oo) , and the conditions in (36.22) hold, then (37.121) can be represented in the form /(z)= -i- J t sh 2rt 00
1r Z
X
0
n+ 1 ), 1-(an ) ) g (t)dt . 1-( 1+v-it a cpq-+m2,q,p-n+2 (z 1 1+v+it, 1-( , 0 1 1-'amq + ) ' 1- I-'m ) (37.122) a
K��{g( T/2) } to the W-transform (W/)(z/2) =
Proof. Applying the operator
g(z/2) we obtain the relations
K�p{9 (�) } = 1r!z J TshrTKiT (2vz)(Wf) ( �) dT 00
0
= ,}vz J rsh rrK , (2y'i)dr 00
,
iT ) iT ) i J r (v - - 2 r (v - s + 2 r [ (/3m ) + ( n+ 1 ) + 1 1--(a(mltn+)1 ) - ] I ( 1 - )ds.(37. 123) 0
s
1
x 2r X
D
0P
S,
8'
,.,,
- S
•
8
s
§ 37. EQUATIONS WITH NON-HOMOGENEOUS KERNELS
(37.120) [1] 1/2 < Rev < 3/4.
757
The condition in enables us to use the results by Vu Kim Than and Yakubovich which justify the interchange of the order of integration in provided that Evaluating now the inner integral using from the cited paper
(37.123) (19)
00 j Tsh7rTKiT(2y'X)r(v - iT/2)f (v - + iT/2)dT = 21r2x" - a s-
s
0
we can rewrite
(37.124)
(37.123) in the form
(37.125) To obtain now the representation in (37.121) it is sufficient to use Theorem 36.8 relative to the G-transform given in (37.125) and the reflection and translation relations ( 1. 9 6) and ( 1.9 7) for the G-function. Now we shall prove that the solution can be represented in the form (37.122). Since q - m - n > m + n - p and the conditions in (36. 22) hold, then by Theorem 36.3 (37.121) can be rewritten 00 m n ( -(a +l ), -(an ) ) 11 1 f(x) = -21r-2 ! ap,q-q ,p- xy 1 -(,8;'; +1 ), -(Pm ) y- dy 00 (37.126) J TSh 1rTKiT(2y'Y)(Wf)(T/2) dT. as
0
X
0
(37.122)
To obtain now it is sufficient to interchange the order of integration in and then apply the relation
(37.126)
00 ) ) n Jy- "KI·T (2 h.\y Gp,q -qm ,p-n (xy � -(-(a!J;n;+l+l ),-(a ) ), -(fJm dy ! t m ,p n 2 l v - iT,-(v +fJ;'iT+l, -),(a-(;+lfJm),) -(an ) ) - 2 0p-+ 2, q - + ( and the property of G-function given in ( 1 . 9 7). The interchange of the order is possible according to the conditions rsh 7rTg( T/2) E L 1 (0, oo ) and &{Jj < 1/4, V HI
0
_
X
758
j= m+
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
1, . . . , q, and the estimate
f aqp,q-m,p-n (xy � --((!J;'a;+t )),, --((fJamn )) ) Y KiT (2vr.:\YJdY +l
00
0
_,
00
< const
j y-Re"(zy)- 114K0(2Vi)dy < +oo. 0
The theorem is thus proved.
•
37.6. Application of fractional integrals to the inversion of the W-transform
37.13 (36.32)
As was shown in Theorem the W-transform is representable as a composition involving the G-transform, defined in The latter can be factorized via the operators in and which may lead to fractional integra-differentiation operators after pairing according to Theorem To give details we investigate an important special case of the W-transform defined in which in its turn generalizes the known Mehler-Fock transform. Namely, we consider the transform defined by
(36.31)
(36.3).
36.10.
(37.107)
(Fa/)(z) = (W�§ 1 "\h)) I /(t)) (z) - iz - s)r(v + iz - s)r(1 - lkt - s) /* (1 - s)ds (37.127) =- _2?ri1_ f r(v r(1 - Pt - s)r(1 - fJ2 - s)r(1 - f33 - s) where Rev > 1/2 and the parameters at, fJt , f32 and {33 satisfy the conditions in (36.5). We shall call it the F3-transform since the kernel of the integral in (37.127) has the form (10.4 7) and is connected with the Gorn function Fa given in (10.45). Picking out the functions r( v - iz - s) and r( v + iz - s) from the kernel we calculate the characteristic (36.7) for the four remaining gamma-functions: (I
(37.128) Now it is easy to formulate the four following theorems which are special cases of Theorems
37.11 - 37.15.
The F3-transjonn defined in (37.127) with the characteristic (0, -y• - 2Rev + 2) where Rev > 1/2 exists on functions in the space rot;,�(L) i/
Theorem 37.16.
§ 37. EQUATIONS WITH NON-HOMOGENEOUS KERNELS
759
and only if 2signc
+ sign('Y + 'Y• - 2R.ev + 2) � 0.
(37.129)
Let the conditions in (36.22) with respect to the parameters fJ1 , fJ2 and f3a be satisfied and (37.130) 'Y• - 2R.ev + 2 > 0. Then the Fa-transform defined in (37.127) exists on functions in the space rot- 1 (L)
Theorem 37.17.
a1 ,
and can be represented in the form
00
(Fa/)(z) r(2 - 2111 - /3) j
where
Fa
( l - v - P - iz,a', l - v - P+ iz, b'; 2 - 2v - P; 1 - t, l - I) !(t)dt,
(37.131) (37.132)
Theorem 37.18.
Let /(z) E rot;,�(L),
1/2 < Rev < 3/4 and 2sign (c - 1) + sign('Y - Re{J- 1/4) � 0.
(37.133)
If the conditions
(37.134) R.e/3 < 1/4, Rea' < 1/4, Reb' :< 1/4 � 2 hold and ze • g(z) E L(O, oo), then we have the following inversion relation for the Fa-transform (g( -z) i.e=/g(z)): + it)f(1 - b1 + it)f(1 - {J + it) ( _F.a- 1 g)(z) = z211-r 1 J f(1 - a1f(1 - a1 - + it)f(2it) aF2 (1 - a' + it, 1 - II - b' + it, 1 - {3 + it; (37.135) 1 - v - a' - b' + it,2it + 1; 1/z)z1'g(t)dt. 00
II -
- oo
X
II -
b'
II -
II -
II -
II -
760
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
Theorem 37.19. Let Re v > 1/2 and the parameters a = Pt + {3 , p�, f32 and Pa = {J satisfy the conditions in (36.22) for m = 0, n = p1 = 1, q =23 and let the
inequality
(37.136) 2sign (c - 1) + sign("Y - Re{J) � 0 hold. Then the following factorization of the F3 -transform in the space rot;,� (L) is valid via the Kontorovich-Lebedev transform (37.109), the modified Laplace transforms (36.1) and (36.2) and the fractional integro-differentiation operators: (Fa!)(z) = 22- 2" K2iz { [t2" - 1 t6 A: 1 t' A: 1 td It+t�• G I G )) ] c: ) } , (37 .137)
(Fa!)(.,) = 22 2" K2iz {[t2 - l t6A: 1 t' It+ tdA: 1 z�· G I ( n) ] c:) } . (37.138) -
•
{Fa/)(z) = 22- 2" K2iz { [t2" - 1 t6 It+t' A: 1 tdA: 1 t�• G I G) ) ] c: )} . {37.139)
The values of the parameters b, e, d, 6 and "Yl with the condition Re6 > 0 for each of these relations are given in Tables 37.1 - 37.3, respectively. Table b a1 - 1 a' - 1 {3 - 1
e
b' - a' {3 - a' b' - a'
d
5
1 - b' + {3 1 + b' - {3 1 + a' - b'
a' + b' - {3 a' b'
Table b a' - 1 {3 - 1 a' - 1
e
1 + b1 - a' 1 + b' - {3 1 + {3 - a'
e
{3 - a' - b' - 1 {3 - a' - b' - 1 -a' - 1
"Yl
-a' - b' -a' - b' -a' - b'
37.2
d
5
{3 - a' - b' - 1 b' - 1 a' - 1
a' a' a' + b' - {3
Table b b' b' {3
37.1
"Yl
1 - {3 1 - a' 1 - b'
37.3
d
5
a' - {3 {3 - a' a' - b'
a' a' a' + b' - {3
"Yl
1 - a' 1 - b' 1 - a'
§ 38. APPLICATIONS TO DUAL INTEGRAL EQUATIONS
761
The proof follows from Theorem 36.5 if we take the arguments in the proof of
37.11
Theorem into account. As has already been noted, the F3-transform includes the Olevskii and Mehler-Fock transforms which are obtained from when a' = and a' = respectively, by using namely: {J =
1/2 - v
(1.79),
(37.107)
0
0,
00
1 ,B (37.140) r(2 - 2v - {J) j1 (t _ 1 ) 1 - 2v2 F1 (1 - v - fJ - ix , 1 - v- fJ + ix; 2 - 2v - {J; 1 - t)f(t)dt, g ( x ) = J t 1 / 4 -vf 2 (t 1) 1 / 4-v / 2 p��/f�iz (2t 1) f (t ) dt . (37.141) 1 These expressions differ from the representations (8.55) and ( 8 .42 ) in Marichev [10) by some changes of variables and functions. The conditions in (37.130) for the validity of (37.140) and (37.141) have the form 2 - 2Rev - Re{J > 0 and 3/2 - Rev > 0 respectively, and it is satisfied owing to the assumption 1/2 < Rev < 3/4 of Theorem 37.15. As regards the Mehler-Fock transform of the form (37.141), the following statement which is derived from Theorem 37.19 immediately is valid. Theorem 37.20. Let 1/2 < Rev < 3/4 and let the inequality (37.142) 2sign ( c - 1) + sign (-y - Rev - 1/2) � 0 hold. Then the transform defined in (37.141) can be factorized in the space rot;,� ( L) x
00
_
_
by the relation
(37.143) where the parameters have the values: b = -1, e = 1/2 - v and d = 1/2 + v or b = -1/2 - v, e = v - 1/2 and d = 1. § 3 8 . Applications of Fractional Integro differentiation to the Investigation of Dual Integral Equations Solutions of many applied problems in mechanics with mixed conditions are reduced to the so-called dual and triple integral equations. It is typical of such equations
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
762
that an unknown function satisfies different integral relations on different intervals. One may find the fundamentals of the theory of such equations in detail, and including surveys of various methods of their solution, for example, in the books by Sneddon 7 or Uflyand and Virchenko - see also the survey by Popov We consider here some typical examples of the applications of fractional integro-differentiation to reducing dual and triple equations to a Fredholm integral equation of the second order, the theory of which is well known.
[1].
[3,
6],
[1]
[3]
38. 1 . Dual equations Example 38.1. In investigations of mixed boundary value problems in mathematical physics using the Hankel transform, one often meets dual integral equations with the Bessel function given in in kernels of the form
(1.83)
J t - 2a [1 + R(t)]lP(t)J,(xt)dt = F(x), 00
0
J t -2fl lJ(t) Ju (xt)dt 00
0
=
0<
x < 1,
G(x), 1 < x < oo.
(38.1)
R(t), F(x) and G(x) are the given functions and lP(t) is an unknown one. To (38.1) in the form which is suitable for using the Kober operators defined (18.5) (18.6) we make the following changes of variables
Here represent in and
Then by using
t/J(y) = y- 1/2 \J(2..fii) , /(x) = 22a x -a F(-/Z), g(x) = 22fl x -fl G(..fi), k(y) = R(2.../i) .
(38.2)
(18.19) these equations are rewritten in the form
(38.3) s,/2-a,2a, t (1 + k)t/J = /, Su/2-{J ,2{J, l tP = g, where the functions f and g are given on the intervals It = (0, 1) and /2 = (1, oo ) , respectively. We first consider the case k ( y) 0. Let =
v)/2 + {J - a. (38.4) Applying the operators in (18. 5) and (18.6) respectively to (38.3) and using (18.21) A = (p +
§ 38. APPLICATIONS TO DUAL INTEGRAL EQUATIONS
763
we arrive at the relations
{38.5) Let a function
h be defined by the expression
{38.6) Then
{38.5) can be rewritten as a single equation {38.7)
for which the inversion relation has the form
{38.8) {18.20). {38.2) {38.1) 0. All {38.1) =
{38.6)
according to Substituting here the value from and making the inverse changes given in we obtain the explicit solution �( t ) of the dual equation for R(t) :: the operations given above are valid under appropriate conditions on parameters and functions. The solution of can be obtained by another method. To obtain it we represent the function I as I It + 12 where ,.
and similarly to this we write 9
={�
{38.9)
= 91 + 92 · Then by {38.5) we have {38.10) {38.10) can be considered as
Since the functions It and 92 are known, then the equation relative to unknowns l2 and 9 1 in the form
{38.11)
764
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
The first term on the left-hand side vanishes on the interval It and we obtain the relation from which the function 9t can be found by the second result in (18.17). Hence the function 9 = 9 + 9 will be obtained. Finding now a function t/J via 9 from the second result int (38.3)2 and using the inversion relation given in ( 18.20) we finally arrive at the representation of the solution in the form (38.12) (38.11) can be considered on the interval I2 . Then the second term on the left-hand side vanishes and after similar arguments we may arrive at the representation of the solution in another form (38.13) t/J = s,../2+a,-2a,tl· One can show that the constructed solutions in (38.8), (38.12) and (38. 13) are equivalent to each other. Now we consider the case of (38.1) with an arbitrary function R(t). We shall use the above solution given in (38.8) in the special case R(t) 0 as a "trivial" solution containing some unknown function h = h + h of the form (38.9). Substituting it into (38.3) we arrive at the system t 2 =
(38.14)
Inverting the second of these equations by the second relation in (18.17) we find the function h on the interval I2 : h2 = K;12_a,,->.92 · Taking the expression h = h t + h2 and the first relation in (18.22) into account we can write the first of these equations on the interval It in the form I:/2+/3,,.. - >. h t + S,.. / 2- a ,2a,tkS,/2+/3, 11->.-2 a ,t h t = I - s,.. / 2- a ,2a ,tkS,/2+/3,1J->.-2a ,t h 2.
(38.15)
Inverting now the operator I:/2+/3,,..- >. by the first equation in (18.17) and using the first result in (18.21) we finally arrive at the relation h t + S,../ 2- a ,>.-11+2a ,tkS,/2+/3,11->.-2a ,t h t
= H,
H = I:/2+a ,>.-,.. f - S,.. /2- a ,>.-11+2a ,t kS,/2+P,11->.-2a,t h2
§ 38. APPLICATIONS TO DUAL INTEGRAL EQUATIONS
765
on the interval It . Under appropriate conditions on the given functions this will Its be a Fredholm integral equation of the second kind relative to the function kernel contains the function and the right-hand side is a known function since the function has already been obtained. Constructing the solution of this equation we can find the function and then the solution of ( ) by ( ) and
h1 .
k
h2
h
38.1
38.8
(38.2 ).
Example 38.2. Here we consider the dual integral equation of the form (X)
j t -" - "(t2 - k2).8 J11 (zt) 'll(t)dt = F(z ), 0 < z < 1, i
(X)
j J.,(zt)'l!(t)dt = G(z), 1 < z < oo, i
(
38.16)
k � 0. As in the previous example we use notations /1 = (0, 1 ) and 12 1, ) After the substitutions 'lt(t) = t"+ 1 1/J(t), F(z) = (z/2)11- 2,8 /(z), G(z) = (2/z)" g(z) (38.17) and the use of the notation in ( 37.47) , (38.16) has the form
where =(
oo ,
S
(g: s
I'
( 0'11,
�2p,
O,
�) ,P(z) k ) 1/J(z) o
=
/(z), z E It ;
( 38.18 ) g(z), z E /2 . Applying the operators in ( 37.45 ) and (37.46 ) respectively to ( 38.18) and using the properties in (37.60 ) and ( 37.61 ) we arrive at the equation
where
h = h1 + h2
-
see (
-
11
,
=
(
38.19)
(
38.20)
38.9) - and h1 (z) = J;t (JJ - {3, {3 - p)/(z), h2 (z) = Rt (/3, 11 - {3)g(z).
766
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
Using now the inversion relation given in {37.65) we find {38.21) whence it is not difficult to obtain an explicit solution of {38. 16) after the inverse change {38. 17) . Example 38.3. Now we consider the dual integral equation of another type
PIJ { H(T) 1/J (T); x} = f(x) , PIJ { 1P(T); x} = g(�),
0 :5 x :5 a;
a < x < oo,
IP I < 1/2,
{38.22)
where P�J { 1P(T); x} =
00
J P�t'/2+iT (chx)1/J(T)dT,
0 :5 x < oo ,
{38.23)
0
is the inverse generalized Mehler-Fock integral transform with the associated Legendre function p:=r/2 + i 7-{z) defined in {1 .79) in the kernel. We note here that if we replace 1P(T) by 7r - 1 Tsh T1rf{1 - v + iT)f{1 - v - iT)g(T) and g(x) by 2v - 3/2 sh 11 2 - v xf( ch 2 (x/2)) in the second relation in {38.22) and put Jl = 1/2 - v , then by {8.42) and {8.43) in Marichev [10] we obtain the inversion of the direct modified Mehler-Fock transform defined in {37.141). The function H( T) in {38.22) is assumed to be known. We introduce analogues of the Erdelyi-Kober operators defined by the following fractional integrals of one function by another one namely ch x (see § 18.2)
x
z
J (sht){ l +�J±l ±�J)/2 {chx - cht) -112=FIJ
IP I < 1/2,
{38.24)
1 ) K±�J {
00
J (sht){l - �J=f l =f�J)/2(cht - ch x)- 112=F �J
lll l < 1/2.
{38.25)
§ 38. APPLICATIONS TO DUAL INTEGRAL EQUATIONS
767
Without writing down the operators obtained by inverting (38.24) and (38.25), we denote them as I±! and K±! respectively. Then by direct evaluation one may prove two following compositional relations:
(38.26) X
-w E Lt (O, oo), where IJJI < and :Fe and
(1.109).
(38.27)
1/2, w(t) = r (1/2 + JJ + it) r (1/2 + JJ - it)[r (1/2 + it) r (1/2 - it)]- 1 , :F, are the sine and cosine Fourier transforms defined in (1.108) and
We introduce the notation
0 :5 z :5 a, a < z < oo,
(38.28)
where G2 (z) = �K; 1 { g(t) ; z}, a < z < oo, and G1 (z) is a certain as yet unknown function. Then applying the operators I:! and K; 1 respectively to (38.22) and taking (38.26) and (38.27) into account we obtain the relation
:Fc { H (T) 1/J (T)i s} = F(z ), 0 :5 z :5 a; a < z < oo, where F(z) = �I:! {f(t); z}, using (1.111) we find the value
0 :5 z :5 a.
(38.29)
Inverting the second of them and
(38.30) where the symbol
(! )
(.1", G)(T) here and below means that the integration in the
corresponding integral in (1.109) is carried out only on the interval ( a, b) instead of (O, oo) . To find the unknown function G1 we substitute (38.30) into the first equation in (38.29) and as a result we obtain the Fredholm integral equation of the second kind. After solving it and finding the function G, defined in (38.28), the required function 1/J ( T) can be obtained by (38.30).
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
768
38.2. Triple equations Example 38.4. We consider triple integral equations of the form 00
I t - 213 J, (xt)'l!(t)dt = F1 (z), 0 < z < a, 0
I t -201 J, (xt)'l!(t)dt 00
0
=
G2 (z),
00
I t - 213 J, (xt)'l!(t)dt = F3(z), 0
F1 , G2
where and substitutions
a<
z < b,
(38.31)
b < z < oo ,
'I!
F3 are given functions and is an unknown one. We make the ,P (t) = t - 1 \l! (t), f(x) = (2/z)213 F(z), (38.32) g(x) = (2/z?01G(z),
setting
z _ Ij, F(x) = j� Fj(x); Fj(x) = { 0F(z), zE (38.33) lj, =l It = (0, a), J2 = (a, b), J3 = (b, ) and defining similarly the function G(z), the functions Gb G3 and F2 being still L...t
e
oo
unknown. Then by (18.19) the system of equations in (38.31) has the form
S,/2- /3,2/3,2 1/J(z) = /(z), s,/2 - cr,2cr,2 1/J (z) = g(z).
(38.34)
From the latter equation we obtain (38.35) 1/J(z) = s,/2+cr, - 2cr,29(z), by using (18.20) where g(z) = 9 t (z) + 92 (z) + 93(z), i.e. g contains the unknown
§ 38. APPLICATIONS TO DUAL INTEGRAL EQUATIONS
functions
169
g1 and g3. To find them we introduce the notations (38.36)
I- 1 K
I
inverse to to the first relation in (38.24). Then and apply the operator we apply the operator to the second result in (38.34) and use the relations in (18.17) and ( 18.21) . This leads us to the result
I- 1 I = Kg:
I- 1 I = I- 1 S.,P = I,/2+fJ ,(p -11)/2+a -fJ S,/2-fJ,2fJ ,2 .,P(x) = S,/2-fJ,(p-11)/2+a+{J,2 1/J(x), Kg = K,/2-fJ,(p-11)/2+fJ- a Sp/2- a,2a,2 1/J(x) (38.37) = S,/2-fJ,(p-11)/2+a+{J,2 1/J(x). In the same way after analogous applications of the operators K - 1 and I it is not difficult to obtain a second relation in the same form, which together with the first one gives the system of equations
I- 1 l(x) = Kg(x), K- 1 l(x) = Ig(x).
(38.38)
Equation (38.38) can be rewritten in the form
X
It
E
I3.
I3,
g1
on the intervals and respectively. Inverting these relative to and respectively we arrive at the following results for these unknown functions:
'('�) K9,(.,) + ( : ) 1 ( � ) - ( : ) r 1 (!) Kg2 (z),
91 (.,) = - ( : )
r
r
r
g3
1 11 (.,) (38.41)
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
770
ga(z) ( :)r 1 ( � ) /g1 (z) + (: )r 1 ( � ) r 1 /a(z) - ( :)r 1 ( ! ) /g2(z). =-
Excluding
(38.42)
93 from here we finally arrive at the relation
91 (.,) = ( : ) r 1 ( � ) K (:) r 1 ( � ) 191 (.,)
+ (: ) r 1 { ( � )r 1 t. (z) - (! )Kg2 (z) }
- (: ) r 1 ( � )K ( :) r 1 { ( � ) r 1 /a(z) - (! ) Jg2 (z) } .
(38.43) Evaluating the compositions of operators given in (38.43) one can see that this relation, under appropriate assumptions on the functions, is a Fredholm integral Considering this equation to be solvable equation of the second kind relative to and using (38.42) , (38.35) and (38.32) we can find the solution of the system of equations (38.31). At the end of this section we shall prove that (38.31) in the special case = 0 is equivalent to the system of equations from the following example.
91 ·
F1 = F3
Example 38.5. We consider the triple integral equations
r(e + s/6) cp (s);x } = 0, E It u /3; 1 rot { r(e + f3 + s/6) (38.44) u ) r(1 + sf rot- 1 { r(1 + + sju) cp (s)j } = 92 (x), where Ij (j = 1, 2, 3) are the intervals in (38.33), while {3, e, 6 > 0, u > 0 are real parameters and the unknown function cp*(s) = rot{cp(x); s} is the Mellin transform - see (1.1 12) - of a certain function cp(x). •
7J
7J -
Q-
X
•
X
a,
7J ,
Using the notation of (38.33) and (23.1) and (23.2) we reduce the system of equations in (38.44) to the form (38.45) or
§ 38. APPLICATIONS TO DUAL INTEGRAL EQUATIONS
771
( : ) I� ;,,( 'l'l (z )+ ( !) I� ; ,,( 'l'2 (z) + ( � ) I� ; ,,( rpa(z) = 0, z E I,, ( � ) r.f+;•,o 'l'l (z) + ( : ) r.f+ ;•,o 'l'2 (z) = g(z), x E Ia, on the corresponding intervals. Using (18. 17) we invert the third, the second and the first of the equations (38.46) relative to the functions and and obtain the relations
cpa, cp2 cp1
cpa (x) = 0, (38.47)
Substituting the value of 'Pl from the third relation into the second one we finally arrive at the Fredholm equation of the second kind
'l'2(z) = ( : ) IO+�"·•+a ( � ) I.f+;•,• ( : ) r::�.HP (! ) r� ;,,( 'l'2 (z) (38.48) + ( : ) rn.t;. ,. +a Y• (z ). relative to cp2 • After inverting this equation it is not difficult to restore the solution
of the system of equations in (38.44). In conclusion we note that if we set
F1 = Fa = 0, =e+ = (eto - .Bo + ,a = < - e - 1) 12, 7] ,
v
Q
7] -
e - 1)/2,
(38.49)
7]
in (38.31), then according to ( 18.19) , ( 18.22), (23. 1) and (23.2) this system of equations has the form (38.44) with o: being replaced by o:0 and ,8 by ,8o and
772
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
6 = u = 2. Obtaining the solution of this system of equations we find the solution of the system of equations given in {38.41) , {38.49}:
w(t) = s,,{Jo +e - ,cp(t ) .
§ 39. B ibliographical Remarks and Additional Information to Chapter 7 39. 1 . Historical notes
d
Notes to § 35.1. The equation of the fonn (35.4) with = 1 and variable lower limit was first considered by Higgins [3] {1964). He obtained its solutions in the form {35.1 1) and (35.14) in the space of sufficiently smooth functions. We note that earlier special cases of this equation with Chebyshev and Legendre polynomials in the kernel were studied by Ta Li [1] {1960), [2] {1961) and Buschman [1] {1962) respectively (see § 39.2, note 35.1 below). Methods of fractional integra-differentiation were first applied by Love [2,3] {1967) to studying (35.1 ) - {35.4) in the spaces Qq and Rr given in § 17.1, Notes to § 10.1 (see § 39.2, note 35.2 below). Theorem 35.1 was not published previously, but the case p = 1 is contained in the papers by Love mentioned above. Notes to § 35.2. Equation (35.16) was first obtained and inverted by Copson [5, p. 353] {1958) when solving the Dirichlet problem for the hyperbolic equation (40.19) with ..\ = 0 in the first quadrant. However, this result was not specially noted in the above paper. Therefore it is generally accepted that the paper by Buschman [3] {1963) was the first where the inversion relations for (35.16) and {35.18) were obtained. Using methods of fractional integra-differentiation and the theory of generalized functions Erdelyi [9] {1964), [12] {1967) found the solution of (35.15) and {35.17) in the form (35.25) and {35.35) (see § 39.2, note 35.3 below). Notes to §§ 36.1 and 36.2 . The idea of defining fractional integrals and derivatives via the inverse Mellin transform operators given in (36.1) and (36.2) was suggested in the papers by Kober [1] {1940) and Erdelyi [4] {1940), though previously it was suggested by Zeilon [1 , p. 4] {1924). The definition of the G-transform via the Mellin-Barnes integral in (36.3) was first introduced by Vu Kim Than, Marichev and Yakubovich [1] {1986) in the form which slightly differs from {36.3). Earlier the special case of such a transform in the form (36.23) was considered by Narain Roop [1] {1959), and this case was investigated more carefully in Narain Roop [2-4] (1962-1963) and Fox [2] {1961). The space !m0 �(L) was introduced by Vu Kim Tuan [1] {1985) who denoted
L - 1 . The more general s�e !JR� 1 (L) was introduced by Vu Kim Tuan [4) (1986). The space L�c ;y ) is a special case of the space L� which was introduced by Akopyan [1, p. 6] {1960)
it by
see also M.M. Dzherbashyan [2]. Theorems 36.1-36.4 were proved in the papers by Vu Kim Tuan [5) {1986) and Vu Kim Than, Marichev and Yakubovich [1] {1986). Notes to § 36 .3. The idea of the factorization of integral transforms, i.e. their representation as compositions of other "more simple" integral transforms, probably first appeared in the expansion expression of the Stieltjes transform represented as the composition of two direct Laplace transforms - Widder [1] {1938), [2] {1946) and also Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi [4, Ch. 14). Tricomi [2] {1935) pointed out the expansion formula of the Hankel transform via the composition of direct and inverse Laplace transforms. Compositions of such a kind were systematically applied by Hirschman and Widder [1) (1958) to studying convolution
§ 39. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 7
773
type transforms. As far as the G-transfonn of the fonn (36.23) is concerned, the idea of its factorization was developed in Fox (3] (1963) , [6] (1971) and Rooney (5] (1983) (see § 39.2, notes 36.1-36.4- below). The technique of factorization of the G-transform of the fonn (36.3) via simpler G-transforms of such a kind, together with special tables and notations were first developed formally, i.e. without characterization of all conditions and spaces of functions, by Brycbkov, Glaeske and Marichev (1) (1983), and also (2] (1986). There were prior investigations by Higgins (4,5) (1965) and Marichev [3) (1973) , [6] (1976). The factorization problem in the space !Dt�� (L) was solved in the paper by Vu Kim Than, Marichev and_Yakubovich [1] (1986) where Theorem 36.5 was proved. Notes to §§ 36.4-36.8. Theorems 36.6-36.8 and 36.1�36.13 were proved by Vu Kim Tuan, Marichev and Yakubovich (1] (1986) and by Marichev and Vu Kim Tuan (2] (1985), [3) (1986) respectively. The other results in these subsections were obtained by Vu Kim Than and have not been published previously. Notes to § 37.1. The solution of (37.1) with � = 1 was obtained by K.N. Srivastava (5] (1964) in a more cumbrous form that given in (37.31)-(37.34). The solution of (37.1) in the form (37.31) with I = 0 and a = 0 was given by Wimp [2] (1965) in terms of the Laplace transform, we refer to Rusia (4,6) . The most perl'ect investigation of the equation (37.1) was carried out by Prabhabr [1] (1969) (the case � = 0, a = 0), [2] (1970) who used methods of fractional inte�differentiation with Re a > 0 and found the solutions (37.32) and (37.33) when Re,B > 0 and Re ,B < Re a, respectively. Equation (37.2) with a = 0, a = 2n + 1 and � = i, i.e. the equation
j (x - t)n In (x - t)f(t)dt I&
= g(x)
0
where In (z) is the modified Bessel function given in (1 .84), was first considered by Tedone (1] (1914) for integer non-negative n. In the case of natural n he reduced this equation to the simplest form with n = 0 and obtained its fonnal solution. The solution of (37.2) with a = 0 and a = 1 was found by Elrod [1] (1958) by using (37.20). A formal solution of (37.41) which differs from (37.4) only by change of variables was obtained by Burlak [1] (1962) and Sneddon [2] (1962). Sufficient conditions for its solvability were indicated by Srivastav [1] (1966) . We note only that (37.4) in another form wa8 already solved by Sonine in 1884. For this see § 39.2, note 37.3 below and also the Brief Historical Outline at the start of this book. The solution of (37.5)-(37.7) was given by Marichev [8] (1978). The presentation in this subsection follows this paper. Notes to § 37.2. The solutions (37.43) and (37.44) of (37.41) and (37.42) were formally obtained by Burlak (1] (1962) and Sneddon [2] (1962) ; see also the papers by Srivastav [1] and Rusia (3]. The necessary conditions for the existence of the solution of (37.41) in the space of continuous functions were given by Bharatiya [1] (1965), and the criterion of solvability for this equation in the space L2(0, oo) was given by Soni [1] (1971). It is generally considered that the solution of (37.41) and hence (37.4) was first given by Bur1ak and Sneddon. However, in actuality the equation which was solved by Sonine (4) (1884), see also [6) (1954), is reduced in the special case to (37.41) by quadratic change of variables (see § 39.2, note 37.3 below). We also note that Sneddon, who did not know of this paper by Sonine, called the operator in (37.41) the Sonine operator on the basis of the fact that Sonine had calculated two special integrals of such a kind of Bessel functions, which are known in literature as Sonine integrals. For these we refer to (2.54) and the handbook by Prudnikov, Brycbkov and Marichev [2, equations 2.12.4.6 and 2.12.35.12]. We also observe that the inversion formula for (37.41) with 11 = 0 in the space L2(0, oo) was indicated in the paper by Rozet [1] (1947) (see § 39.2, note 37.4 below).
774
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
The generalized Erdelyi-Kober operators defined in (37.45) and (37.46) and generalized operator of the Hankel transform given in (37.47) were introduced by Lowndes [1] (1970), who had proved (37.48)-(37.66) and other results. Notes to § 37.3. The operator inverse to the operator (37.67) in the form (37.81) was first constructed by Bakievich [1] (1963) for 0 < a < 1. However, in the special case a = 1 the inversion of this operator, in the form of the relations in Theorem 37.6, was obtained earlier in the paper by Vekua [1] (1945), and also his book (3, p. 69, 70]. In this paper the expressions of the form (37.78) and (37.79) and more general relations proved in 1942 and connecting the solutions of the Laplace equation �u = 0 and the Helmholtz equation �u + �2 u = 0 were indicated. In this connection, § 40.2 and § 43.2, note 40.1 should be seen. A special case of (37.71) written in another form was indicated in the paper by Henrici [1 , p. 256] (1957). Other results of this subsection are the development of investigations given in the paper by Lowndes [9] (1985) where a modified form of the operator (37.68) was indicated and studied. Theorem 37.7 was mentioned in the paper by Marichev [1] (1972) as a special case of a more general statement. Notes to § 37.4. The results of this subsection were given by Marichev [1] (1972). Notes to § 37 .5. Special cases of the so-called integral transforms with respect to an index, or with respect to a parameter of special functions were discovered and investigated comparatively recently. The book by Lebedev [4] presents the fundamentals of the theory of Kontorovich-Lebedev transforms defined in {37.109), {37.110), and Mehler-Fock transforms given in (37.141), (38.23). In the paper by Wimp [1] published in 1964 the considerably more general transform (37.113) with the Meijer G-function in the kernel was introduced. Its inversion formula was obtained, and five special cases were considered. For this the book by Marichev [10, Section 8.4] should be seen. A more compact form for the inversion relation given in {37.122) was found by Yalrubovich (1] (1985), who also investigated the compositional stJUcture of this transform. The presentation in this subsection follows the paper by Vu Kim Than, Marichev and Yakubovich [1] {1986). We also note that different representatives of the above transforms with G-functions and H-functions in the kernel were considered in the papers by Kalla [1] {1970) and Shah [1] (1972). Notes to § 37.6. The Fs-transfonn in the form (37.131) was introduced in the paper by Brychkov, Marichev and Yalrubovich (1] (1986). Theorems 37.16-37.20 were proved by Yakubovich and have not been published previously. Notes to §§ 38.1 and 38.2. The solution of the dual equations {38.1) in the case = G = #-£ = v = 0, a - {3 = 1/2, and F 1 was first obtained by Beltrami [1] (1881) . We also note that earlier, Weber (1] (1872) had formulated problems for partial differential equations reducible to dual equations. Different special cases of (38.1 ) with = G = #-' = v = 0 in the main were studied much later in the papers by King (1] (1935), Busbridge [1] (1938), Tranter [1-3] (1950-1954), Gordon (1] (1�54) and Noble [1] (1955), and also Titchmarsh [1] (1937, 1948). Various methods which mainly differ from methods of fractional integro-dift'erentiation were used in the above papers. Fractional integration of order 1 /2 was first applied by Copson [3] {1947) to solve dual equations of the form (38.1). In this context see also Noble (2] (1958) and Sneddon [1] (1960). This method was developed in the papers by Copson [6] (1961) , Peters [1] {1961) and Lowengrub and Sneddon [1] (1962), [2] (1963) in order to solve (38.1 ) in the case #-' = v, 0. Fractional integration with Sonine operators (see § 39.2, note 37.3) was first applied by Ahiezer (1] (1954) to solving dual equations of the form (38.16) with F = #-' = v = 0 and modified order of conditions on :c. In his paper (2] (1957) this result was generalized to the case v = -1-' · The papers by Peters (1] (1961), Burlak [1] (1962), Lowndes (1] (1970) , etc. were devoted to the investigation of (38.16) with arbitrary #-' and v . However, all these articles contained an improper setting of the problem. Instead of integration over (k, oo ) in the first equation in {38.16) , integration over (0, oo ) was taken. But this is not correct for arbitrary {3 if the values of the function (t2 - k2 ){j on 0 < t < k have not been specified. It should be noted that in the papers by Erdelyi and Sneddon [1] (1962) and Sneddon [2] (1962), the systematical application of the Erdelyi-Kober type operators given in (18.1)-(18.6) to
R
::
R
R ::
§ 39. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 7
775
the theory of dual, triple, etc. equations was begun. At the same time, the investigations in these and many following papers were carried out formally without studying the spaces of the functions, and the conditions on the pMameters. Subsections §§ 38.1 and 38.2 were written using material from the papers by Erdelyi and Sneddon [1] (1962) and Sneddon [2] (1962) Example 38.1, Lowndes [1] (1970) Example 38.2, Virchenko and PonomMenko (1] (1979) - Example 38.3, Virchenko and Makarenko [2] (1975) Example 38.4, Lowndes (2] (1971) and Sneddon (5) (1975), [6] (1979) Example 38.5, with some modifications. We also note that the solution in (38.8) was obtained by Titchma.rsh [1, p. 334] (1937), when � = 11, and by Peters (1] (1961), while the solutions in (38.12) and (38.13) were found by Noble (1] (1965) and the method of "trial" solution (Example 38.1) was used by Gordon (1] (1954) and Copson (6] (1961). -
-
-
-
39.2. Survey of other results (relating to §§ 35-38) 3 5 .1. The integral equation
J (t -rx)c(c) -1 #'1 (a, P; c; l - ;t ) f(t)dt 1
=
g(x),
0 < XQ � X � 1,
(39.1)
was considered by Higgins (3] who obtained two fonns for its solution
f (x) X
(
#'1 m , -P; a
- c
+ m; 1
- �) dt,
under the appropriate assumptions for a BUfticiently smooth right hand side g (x). Here If_ is the fractional integro-differentiation operator given in (2.18) or (2.34). We note that the above paper by Higgins was the first one in which the technique of factorization of the �1-transform by using fractional integro-differentiation operators was applied. The solution of the equation
f(x) =
m 1 t x)m- - 1 r��1� c) j e - e X
X
�1
(- a, -P; m - c; 1 - ;) g(m) (t)dt,
m = 1 , 2, . . . , m > Rec > 0, which differs from (39.1) by replacing 1 - tfx by 1 - x/t was obtained by Wimp (2] by using the
Laplace transform. Earlier special first kind Tn (x) in the kernel
cases
of this equation with the Chebyshev polynomial of the
J1 � f(t)dt t2 - x2
= g(z),
X
and with the Legendre polynomial
Pn (x) in the kernel
0 < zo � "' � 1,
(39.2)
776
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
1
J Pn (t/x)f(t)dt = g(x),
0 < xo $
x $ 1,
(39.3)
z
were considered in the papers by Ta Li [1, 2] and Buschman [1], respectively. The classical scheme for the solution of the Abel equation in (2.1) (see § 2.1) was used in these papers. In the paper by Widder [4) {39.2) and (39.3) were solved by the method based on the Laplace transform. We also observe that in the paper by Erdelyi [7) the equation of the form (39.3) was solved by using Rodrigues formula. The solutions of the equations of the form (39.3) in which Pn (x) is replaced by the generalized Legendre polynomials Q mk (x) and by the generalized Rice polynomials H�a, fJ ) (x) and by the hypergeometric function ¥"3(-n, a + f3 + n + 1, e, e ' ;p, p1, 1 + a; x), were obtained by R.P. Singh [1] and Dixit [1, 2], respectively. The solution of the integral equation
1
j(t - x)a P�� ,/3) (� - 1) f(t)dt = g(x),
0<
xo $ x $ 1,
(39.4)
z
with the Jacobi polynomials
P�a,/J) (x) = (a + 1)n [n!] - 1 �'t (-n, n + a + f3 + 1; a + 1; (1 - x)/2), which is a special case of (39.1), was first obtained by Higgins [2] - see also K .N. Srivastava [4] and Rusia [5) . In the papers by Bhonsle [1, 2], Rusia [2, 7), C. Singh [3] and K.N. Srivastava [3, 6-8] solutions of the equations of homogeneous type containing Jacobi polynomials in the kemel
were obtained. 35.2. We denote by Qq (a, b), 0 $ a < b $ oo, the space of functions r.p(x) given on (a, b) almost everywhere and such that the function xfr.p(x) is locally integrable on (a, b). Love [2] obtained necessal'y and also sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of the solution of (35.1) and (35.2) in Q9(o, d), 0 < d < oo, and their explicit solutions in the form (35.5)-(35.8). These investigations were continued in the paper by Love [3] where (35 9) (35 . 12) for the solutions of (35.3)-(35.4) in the space Q q (d, oo), 0 < d < oo, were proved. We note that the representations for the solution of the equation of the form (35.2) as the compositions of two Erdelyi-Kober-type operators given in (18.1) and (18.2) were formally done by Buschman [5). Miiller and Richberg [1] obtained the inversion formulae in the special case of ' (35.3) with Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind in the kern.el
.-
f(t)dt = g(x), f� t2 - x2 00
x > 0,
z
which is an analogy of (39.2) . R.K . Saxena and Kumbhat
[3] deduced the inversion relations for the operators
r�:) f c'l-"Y (t - x)"Y- 1 :#'1 (a, {3; 1 - �) f(t)dt 00
z
-y;
(39.5)
§
777
39. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 7
for f(x) E Lp(O, oo), 1 � p � 2 ; under the appropriate assumptions on the parameters. Goyal and Jain [1] found the inversion relations for the operators more general than {39.5) with Wright hypergeometric function in the kernel. Braaksma and Schuitman (1] obtained the inversion relations for the operator of the form
(35.4)
; f (1 - � ) c- 1 �1 (a, b; c; 1 - ; ) f(t) �t A' A 23.2, 18.3).
Af
00
( )(x) = r c)
:t:
in the space of test functions T(�, ll) and for the operator conjugate to in the space of generalized functions T' (�, Jl) (see § note Using methods by Love [2, 3], Prabhakar (4) constructed the solution of the equation
x > 0,
Re c
> 0.
{39.6)
McBride [1] obtained invel'Sion relations for the equation H�J = g (see § 23.2, note 18.5) more general than (35.1), and also for similar generalizations of (35.2)-(35.4). The investigations were given in the spaces of test Fpp and generalized Fp p function considered in § 8.4.
Saigo [1, 2] found the inversion relations for the operators T;/·" and 1::!·" , -oo � a < . b � oo (see § 23.2, note 18.6). In the paper by Smirnov (5) the inversion relation for the equation of the first kind with
Gauss hypergeometric function in the kernel, which arose in solving the Trikomi problem for equations of mixed type with two degenerate lines, was obtained by reduction to an equation of the form (35.1). 35.3. Using methods of fractional integro-differentiation Erdelyi (9] obtained necessary and also sufficient conditions for the existence of the solution, integrable on a finite interval, of (35.15) for Re ll < 1 and Re v � -1/2, and he constructed the explicit solution of this equation in the form (35.25). Erdelyi also indicated the form (35.35) for the solution of (35.17) with = oo, which was investigated earlier by K.N. Srivastava [1]. There is a mistake in his inversion expression see also Habibullah [2]. In the paper by Erdelyi [12], (35.15) with arbitrary real Jl and " was studied in the space of generalized functions with support on (O,oo) and conditions for the solution to be an usual function were found. Smirnov [4, 6) indicated sufficient conditions for the invertibility of two equation of the form (35.15) and (35.16) written in another way and gave their inversion relations. Din Khoang Anh (1) obtained the conditions for the existence and uniqueness of the solution of (35.15)-(35.16) with e = 0 and of (35.17)-(35.18) with = oo in the spaces Lp((O, a), x'"Y) and Lp((a, oo), x'"Y), 0 < a < oo, respectively, and constructed the inversion relations for them. We note that a series of pages by Buschman [2], Higgins [1] and K .N. Srivastava [2] were devoted to solving equations of the form (35.17) with Gegenbauer ultraspherical polynomials C�(x) in the kernel instead of P,Nx). 35.4. In the paper by Sneddon (4) the general method based on the Mellin transform defined in (1.112) and the convolution theorem in (1.115) was suggested for solving the equation
d
d
j ( �) f(t) �t a
k
:t:
As examples, solutions of (35.4),
= g(x),
0 � x � a, a � oo.
(39.7)
(35.15), (35.17) with d = oo, (39.1)-(39.3), etc. were given.
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
778
35.5. Kalla and Saxena [2] obtained the inversion relations for the operators
�x-'1 - 1 r(1 _ a)
f rf1 ( z:
0
a , {J + m; -y; -;;A
)
atP t'1 J(t)dt,
{39.8)
{39.9) more general than {23.5) and {23.6) for provided that the conditions
E
E
f(x) Lp(O,oo), 1 � p � 2, or f(x) rolp(O, oo), p > 2,
Re ("Y - a - {J) > m - 1 ,
-y :f:. 0, - 1 , -2, . . . ,
m = 1 , 2, . . . , f.' > O,
1 /p + 1/p1
= 1, I arg(1 - a)l < hold. Here !Dlp(O, oo) means the subspace of Lp(O , oo), p > 2, consisting of functions which the inverses of the Mellin transfonn of functions in Lp'(-ioo, ioo) - see also § 23.2, note 18.1. Re77 > max(1/p, 1/p' ),
1r
are
In the paper by Parashar [1] equations more general than (23.5) and {23.6) with the Meijer G-function in the kernel were considered, and the uniqueness of their solutions in the space L1 (0, oo) was proved provided that certain conditions hold. The inversion relations for such equations in Lp(O, oo), 1 � p � 2, or in !Utp(O, oo), p > 2, were obtained in Kalla [3] by using the Mellin transfonn. These results were extended by Kalla [12], Kalla and Kiryakova [1] and Kalla [11] to more general equations with the Fox H-function and an arbitrary function, respectively in the kernels. One may find other generalizations of (23.5) and (23.6) in § 23.2, note 18.4. 35.6 . Love [6] obtained necessary and also sufficient conditions for the solvability of the integral equation 00
J rf1 (a, b; c; -x/t)t"f(t)dt = g(x),
0<x<
oo.
0
He constructed the solution of this equation on the basis of the representation of the left-hand side as the composition of the Rie -Liouville fraction� integration operator in (5.1) and the Stieltjes transform (see § 9.2, note 7.3). Another fonn for the solution of this equation via the inverse Mellin transfonn was given earlier by Swaroop [1] . These investigations were continued in the papers by Prabhakar and Kashyap [1] and Love, Prabhakar and Kashyap [1] where the integral equations
mann
f tcr(c)-1 rf1 (a, b; c; - ;t ) f(t)dt = g(x), f tc-r(c)1 1F1 (a; c; -xt)f(t)dt = g(x) 00
00
0
0
were solved on the basic of the representation for the left sides as the compositions of the Rie Liouville fractional integration operator given in (5.3) and Stieltjes and Laplace transfonns, respectively. 35.7. Lebedev [1] proved that the integral equation
mann-
(TJ)(x) = ! JK ( t x ) j (t)dt = g(x), t+x + a
1r
0
2../iX
0�
x � a,
{39.10)
§ 39. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 7 where K(u) = (7r/2)'}/i't{1/2, 1/2; 1; u 2 )
is
779
the elliptic integral of the first kind has the solution
a �dx f Jt2tdt x2 dtd f Jt-rg(2-r)d.,.2-r . t
f(x) =
_
! 1r
_
X
_
0
This result is based on the representation for the operator T as the composition of the left-sided and right-sided fractional integration operators by the function x 2 :
(TJ)(x) = ! 7r
x
f 0
fa
dt f (-r )d-r . 2 2 Jx t t J.,.2 t2 _
_
This method was simultaneously applied by Copson [3] to solving a two-dimensional equation in electrostatics. It should be noted that the papers by Lebedev and Copson were the first publications where integral equation of the first kind with special functions in the kernels were solved by means of their representations as the simpler equations of Abel type, where solutions were already known. In other words, the method of factorization for integral operators with special functions in the kernels was used in these papers for the first time. We also note that Lebedev [1] applied his result to the equation
fa 0
(
)
1 1 4xt (xt)m (x + t) 2m+1 �1 m + 2 ' m + 2 ; 2m + 1 ; (x + t) 2 f(t)dt = g(x),
and in the paper by Kalla [10] a similar equation with other parameters
fa (x
+ t) - 2 a�1
0
0$
(
1 a, 2 ; 1 ;
x $ a,
)
4xt (x + t)2 f(t)dt = g(x), 0 < a < 1,
was solved by method of Lebedev. In the paper by Ahiezer and Shcherbina [1] of the equation
fa (x2 0
1 + t2 )P
:l"l (�
2'
p + 1 . !. 2 ' 2'
)
4x2 t2 (x2 + t2 ) 2 ! (t) dt g (x),
was given where 0 < a $ +oo, 0 < 2p < q < 2p + 2. case of (39.10') ; see also Williams [1]. a
If
0<
x
a
< a,
formal solution
(39.10')
p = 1 /2, q = 2, then (39.10) is a special
35.8. By using Erdelyi-Kober type operators given in (18.1)-(18.4) Lowndes [4, 6] obtained solution of the integral equation of the first kind
f6 �(x, t)cp(t)dt a
=
f (x),
a<
x < b,
(39.11 )
780
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
in the following cases:
- 1 t6 1J K:(x, t) = r(1u6xCT'1 - a)r(1 - /3) a=
00
I
max(z,t)
0, b = +oo, 0 < a , /3 < 1 , u > 0, 6 > 0, -oo < J,£, '1 < oo ;
and
-u( cr+'l ) t6( 1 -p -J3 ) - 1 K: 1 (x, t) = u6x r(a)r(/3)
min(z,t)
I a
b < +oo, u > 0, 6 > 0,
a>
0, {3 > 0, - oo < J,£, v < oo,
where 1/l(t) is a certain function. The paper by Williams (1] is also relevant. As examples the equation a
I 0
K� (plx - t l ) -, = l x - t l "'
rp(t)dt
f (x), 0 < x < a,
Rep > 0, 1�1 < 1/2,
with the modified Bessel function K� (z), and the equation of the form (39.10') were considered. Ahner and Lowndess (1] found the solution of (39.11 ) with the kernel K:(x, t) more general than the above equations, and applied their results to solving dual and triple integral equations of the form (38.16), (38 .44). 36.1 . Fox (3, 5, 6] developed a method of solving the integral equation 00
Kf(x) :::
I k(xt)f(t)dt
= g(x),
x > 0,
(39.12)
0
provided that the Mellin transform k* (s) = rol{k(x); s}, - see (1.112) - of the kernel k satisfied certain conditions. On the basis of the convolution theorem in (1 .116) for the Mellin transform the method of solving (39.12) in L2 (0, oo) was developed in the paper by Fox [3] provided that the function k* (s) satisfied the functional equation
k* (s)k* (1 - s) =
j )r(a; + ('lj + s)/m; ) IJn r(a; r+(('l('lj ++ 11 -- s)/m . s)/m )r(('lj + s)/m )
j=1
j
;
;
(39.13)
The simplest case when k* (s)k* (1 - s) = 1 is well-known, as for example, in the book by Titchma.rsh (1, p. 40 1) . In the paper by Fox [3] the solution of (39.12) with the kernel k(x) satisfying (39.13) was expressed via the Erdelyi-Kober type operators defined in (18.1)-(18.4) . For example, if (39.13) holds with a 1 = a, '11 = 'I and m 1 = m, then the formal solution of (39.12)
§
39. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 7
781
has the form 00
f(x) =
I (I�+;m;f1/mk)(xt)(I�+;m;f1/mg)(t)dt 0
where the operator IO+; tT, f1 is given in (18.1). As an example, the solution of (39.12) with k(x) = �xOt cos(x - onr/2) was given also. In the paper by Fox [5, 6] on the basis of direct and inverse Laplace transforms defined in (1.119) and (1.120) a method was developed by which a formal solution of (39.12) with the kernel k( x) such that {39.14) can be obtained. As examples, the solutions of (39.12) were obtained with k{x) = sin x, k(x) = foJ11 (x) and k{x) = x11 K11(x) where J11(x) and K11(x) are the Bessel function of the first kind defined in {1.83) and the Macdonald function given in {1.85), respectively. This method was applied by Fox [1] and by R.U. Verma [8] to finding the inversion relations for the Vanna transform defined in (9.6) and for the transform of the form {39.12) with the Meijer G-function G� : � (x) - (1.95) - in the kernel, respectively. 36.2. It is said that k(x) and h(x) form a pair of Fourier kernel• if they satisfy reciprocal inverse relations
I
00
I
00
k(xt)f(t)dt = g(x),
0
h(xt)g(t)dt = f(x),
(39.15)
0
and each of them can be considered as the inversion expression of one another. H h(t) :# k(t) and h(t) = k(t) then the Fourier kernels are called non-aymmetrical and aymmetrical Fourier kernels, respectively. Often more general relations than (39.15)
1
00
0
where kl (x) =
�
� 1 g(t)dt, 1 h1 (xt)g(t) � 1 f(t)dt,
k 1 (xt)j(t) t
�
00
=
0
�
0
J k(t)dt, h1 (x) = J h(t)dt are considered. 0
0
t
�
=
(39.16)
0
They are reduced to {39.15) provided
that differentiation of the integrand is possible. Investigation of the Meijer G-function as a symmetric Fourier kernel was first given by Narain Roop [1]. These investigations were developed in the paper by Fox (2] where the new general function of hypergeometric type called later the Fox H-function was first introduced and studied. The theory of Fox H-function may be found in the paper by Braaksma (1] and in the book by Mathai and Saxena [1] and in the handbook by Prudnikov, Brycbkov and Marichev [3]. Problems connected with symmetrical Fourier kernels were also considered by Marichev [10] and Verma R.U. [4). Using a method based on the direct and inverse Laplace transforms R.U. Verma (5, 6] reduced equations of the form {39.12) with G- and H-functions, respectively in the kernels, to the equations with symmetrical Fourier kernels, and constructed the solutions of such· equations in closed form. In the paper by Kesarvani [2-5) G- and H-functions were studied as non-symmetrical Fourier kernels. We also note that Kesarvani (7) found necessary and sufficient conditions for functions
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
782
f(x), g(x) E
L2 (0, oo ) to satisfy the dual equations (39.15) with
�:.
where G 2 is the Meijer G-function defined in (1.95). 9 In the case when h(t) = in (39.15) or in (39.16), functions and are called k-tran&jorm& of each other. Mainra [1] and B. Singh [1) studied the classes of k-transforms (39.15) in which Fourier kernels are respectively the generalized Watson functions w�!:::·.:�': expressed via multiple integrals of products of Bessel functions, and via the function formed by the application the Erdelyi-Kober-type operators given in (18.1) and (18.3) to the Watson function. Soni [2] proved that if L , oo ) , Re a > 0 and Re 71 > -1/2, then and are and are k-transforms if and only if the functions where the Kober operators defined in (18.5), (18.6) are the same k-transforms. 36.3. A series of papers by Fox [2], Kesarwani (5], R.K. Saxena [2, 4), K.C. Gupta and Mittal (1], Rattan Singh (1], Kalla (9), Buschman and Srivastava (1], Kumbhat [1], Nasim [1] are concerned with finding inversion relations in Lt (0, oo ) or in L2(0, oo ) of equation of the form (39.12) with the Fox H-function or its special cases in the kernel. Solutions include the fractional integration operators of Erdelyi-Kober-type given in (18.1) and (18.3) in some special cases R.K.Saxena (2], Kalla [9], Buschman and Srivastava [1]. As examples the inversion relations were obtained for the Varma transform given in (9.6), and for the Hankel and the Meijer transforms (see § 1 .4). In the papers by V.P. Saxena (1], Bhise and Madhavi Dinge (1] and Madhavi Dinge (1] integral operators of the form (39.12) with the Fox H-function in the kernel were represented as compositions of the Erdelyi-Kober-type operators defined in (18.1) and (18.3), and operators of the form (39.12) with the Fox H-function of less order. R.U. Verma [7) formally constructed the solution of a two-dimensional integral equation with a kernel which is a product of two Fox H-functions of one variable. We note that Raina and Koul [1,2] and Raina [1] proved that the fractional integrals defined in (5.1) and (5.3) of Fox H-functions are H-functions also but of greater order. 36.4. Rooney (5] investigated the mapping properties on the integral transform
k(t)
f(x) g(x)
/(x), g(x) E 2 (o It, f(x) K;, f(x) a a
g(x)
(Kj)(x) from the weighted
space
0
Cp,r
It,a , K;,/(x)a
J (xt I at , · · ' , ap ) f(t)dt, x { f : l f(x } 00
=
=
G�"
JxP
)J• .,- t dx <
(39.17)
> 0,
bb . . . , bq
oo,
1�r<
oo
(x)
-
see
Rooney [3]
-
onto £1 - JJ ,• • By using the Mellin transforms he obtained a characterization of the range of the operator in terms of the ranges of the Erdelyi-Kober-type operators given in (18.1) and (18.3), and of the modified Hankel and Laplace transforms:
K/
00
(Ht,11 f)(x) J(xt) 1/k-l/2J, (Ikl(xt)11k )f(t)dt, =
Re71 > - 1 ,
0
(Lt ,af)(x) J(xt) -a e-lk J(zt)l/A: f(t)dt, k 00
=
0
=
±1, ±2, . . .
,x
> 0,
under the appropriate assumptions on the parameters of Meijer G-function in the kernel.
In
§ 39. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 7
783
the case p + q = 2m + 2n, the conditions and the expression for inversion of the equation = were given. Let
(Kj)(x) g(x)
f(x) x-'Y-112H1 ,-y [t'Y+1 12f(t)](x), £a+-y+ 1/2+1/p,p £-y+1/2+1/p,p' 'H-y
=
V�J is a fractional derivative in (5.8). Gasper and Trebels (4] proved the bowtdedness of the operator V�'H-y from into and deduced necessary conditions for 'H-y-multipliers of type (p, p). 36.5. A series of papers is concerned with the application of the Erdelyi-Kober-type operators (18.2) and (18.4) to finding inversion relations for the integral transforms (39.12) with special Macdonald fwtction and Whittaker fwtction in the kernels. Saksena [1] , Fox [5], Okikioulu [3,6] and Manandhar [1] used the Erdelyi-Kober-type operators defined in {18.1 )-(18.3) and the Mellin transform given in {1.112) to finding inversion relations in Lp 0, oo) for the transform
K11 (x)
Wt,p (x)
(
00
x'Y j(xt)a-112K11 _1,2 (xt)f(t)dt g(x), x =
(39.18)
> 0,
0
in the cases p = 2, "( = 0, a = 11 > 1/2; p > 1, 11 > 1/p, 'Y � 1 - 2/p > 'Y - 11 , a + 1 - 1 /p > 11 > -a + 1/p and 1 � p < oo, 11 E a > l11 - 1/21 + 1 /2 + 1/p' 1/p + 1/p' = 1) if v > 0 and a > l11l - 1 /p' if 11 < 0, respectively. Okikioulu [3) showed that the operator in {39.18) can be represented as the composition of the modified Laplace transform and the Erdelyi-Kober-type transform defined in (18.3), and it is bounded from Lp(O, oo) into Lq (O, oo), 1 /q = 1 - "( - 1 /p > 0. He also proved that integral transforms of the form {39.18) with replacing by
R1 ,
y1/2-11Y1/2_11 (y) y1/2-11 H1/2_11 (y)
(
ya-1/2K11_1,2 (y) y112-11 J11_1,2 (y), Jp(y), Yp(y), Hp(Y)
and where are Bessel and Struve functions - as given in {1.83), and Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi [2, 7.2.1, 7.5.4) are representable as compositions of the Erdelyi-Kober-type fractional integrals defined in (18.1), (18.3) and the cosine- and sine- Fourier transforms given in {1.108), {1 .109) . The Kober operators in { 18.6) were applied by Saksena (1] and R.K. Saxena (1] to obtaining inversion relations for the Varma transform given in (9.6). We also note that the inversion of the Vanna transform in terms of the direct L and inverse L Laplace transform operators was fowtd by Fox [7). H .M. Srivastava [1] obtained the inversion relation for the transform
-1
00
j (xt)11- 1 12e-xtf2 wk+ 1/2 ,p (xt)f(t)dt g(x), x =
{39.19)
> 0,
0
which coincides with the Varma transform in the special case 1.1. = 11. H.M. Srivastava proved that if E is the solution o£ (39.19) and - v � k < v + 1/2, then = , is the inverse Laplace transform operator and where L is the Erdelyi-Kob r operator
-1 k 11J-+,1k,11-110 f(x) L I�'i� v -kg(x)
f(x) L2 (0,oo) L-1
given in {18.2). Other representations for the solution of (39.19) were given by Pathak [1). We also note that McKellar, Box and Love [1] and Love [8] applied fractional integro differentiation to finding inversion relations for the integral transform of the form {39.12) with the Struve function in the kernel - Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi [2, 7.5.4). 36.6. K .J. Srivastava [1-3] applied the Kober operators defined in (18.5) and {18.6) to the investigation of the generalized Mellin transform given in (9.7) and acting from L O, oo) into 00 Lp ' (O, oo) {1 � p � 2, 1/p + 1/p' = 1), and to studying in L2 (0, oo) the transform
H11 (z)
p( J wp,ll (xt)f(t)dt 0
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
784
with the Watson function
wp,11 (x) = x112 J t-1 J11 (t)Jp(xft)dt 00
0
in the kernel, where
Bessel function given in (1.83) K.J. Srivastava [1] and [2], [3] , respectively. 36.7. Marichev [1,2] considered the equation -
f f(t) (x-r(c)t)e- 1 Fa ( z:
1
Fa
is the
x t ) dt =g(x), c > O,
a, a , ,B, ,B' ; c; 1 - t , 1 - ;
a
0�
J11 (x)
a x b <
<
�
oo ,
Re
involving the Appel function of two variables defined in {10.45) in the kernel. He obtained the solution of this equation via the composition of three fractional integro-difl'erentiation operators or via the operator with the function in the kernel (see § 10.3). Similar equations with the Appel function in the kernel were studied by Marichev and Vu Kim Than [1). Vu Kim Tuan [6] proved necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of the solution of the Abel-type equation
Ft
Fa
a
z:
f (x � t)e-1 ( ;t ) p(x, t)f(t)dt = g(x), (c) p(x, x) x) E Qq p(x,t) = 1Ft(a;b;�(x - t)), i"t(a,b;c;1 - xft), Fa(a,a';b,b';c;1 -
being an analytic function, ":# 0, in the space of function / { (see § 17.2, notes to § 10.1). He extended these results to equations containing Kummer, Gauss and Appel hypergeometric functions: 0
l'(x, t) xft.1 -tfx).
36.8 . H.M. Srivastava and Buschman [1] considered operators of the fonn
x-"f -a J(x at)0 -1 t"� f(t)dt, x6 J(t bx)P-1 c6 -P f(t)dt, a= b= Ft 2F1 . 00
z:
+
+
0
z:
from which the Kober operators in {18.5) and (18.6) are derived if - 1. They - 1 and proved that the composition of these operators is the integral operator with a homogeneous kernel involving the Appel function and, in particular, the Gauss hypergeometric function 36.9. Habibullah [1] .investigated the integral operators
AJ(x) = x� J(xt)b-l i"t (a, b; c; - xt)f(t)dt, 00
0
00
BJ(x) = x� /(xt) a-l tFt(a,c; - xt)f(t)dt, 0
C J(x) = x� J(xt)a-l t� (a, c;xt)f(t)dt, 00
0
�1
tFt
where is the Gauss hypergeometric function defined in (1 .72), is the confluent hypergeometric function given in (1 .81) and tJ is the Tricomi function - Erdelyi, Magnus,
§ 39. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER
7
785
Oberhettinger and Thicomi [1,6.5]. He proved that the operators A and B can be represented as compositions of the Erdelyi-Kober-type operators given in {18.1) and the generalized Stieltjes and Laplace transforms, respectively, and the operator C can be represented as a composition of the generalized Stieltjes and Laplace transfonns (see § 1.4 and § 9.2, notes 7.3, 7.8). On the basis of these results Habibullah proved the boundedness of the operators A, B and C from Lp(O, oo), p � 1, into Lq (O, oo), 1/q = 1 - 1/p - � � 0, and found their inversion relations under the appropriate assumption on parameters. We note that this type of result in another space of functions was previously obtained by Swaroop [1). We refer also to Marichev [10, Sect. 8.2) with respect to the operators A and B, and to Love [6] with respect to the operator A. 36.10. Let It, be the Kober operator defined in {18.5), let af'1 be the Gauss a hypei'geometric function given in {1.72) and let Tn be the integral operator (Tn f )(x) = s
{-1)"xf(x) + J k(t/x)f(t)dt. Erdelyi [5) proved that if f(x) E L2 (0, oo), k(x) = [B(n, £1 + 0 1)] -1 x / 2 af't (1 - n, £1 + n - 1 ; �-« + 1 ; x), £1 > -1, then Tn be represented in the form can
"
36.1 1. By using the fractional integrals xfJ Ig+ x"Y and xfJ J�x"Y Marichev [6] proved relations of compositional type which are special cases of (36.34). Analogues of (11.27)-(11.30) which realize the connection between certain pairs of the integral operators with special functions in the kernel and the singular operator are more interesting. We indicate two pairs of such a type, namely
{39.20) where IRe £11 <
00
1/2, {J, (2.fi)}rp = J J11{2v;Ji)rp(t)t-1 dt, and 0
2J8+ ( 1J, b)rp(x) =
sin IJ1r sin b1r sin( c - (J - b)1r '
,
"
_
sin(c - 1J)1r sin(c - b)1r ' sin(c - a - b)1r
_
(Srp)(x) = !. 1r
f rp(t)dt t-x .
{39.21)
c ¢ IJ + b,
00
These relations were previously obtained in Marichev (3]. All expressions of this kind hold for sufficiently good functions, and can be proved by applying the Mellin transform defined in (1.112) to both sides of the equation. We note in addition that by using relations of such a type and the Mellin transform, Marichev [7) indicated the class of complete singular equations with power-logarithmic kernels solved by quadratures. 36.12. H .M. Srivastava [1] employed the Riemann-Liouville fractional integro-differentiation in identities involving infinite series. He showed how such exercises cuhninate in linear and bilinear generating functions for a wide variety of special functions. 0
786
CHAPTER
7.
INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
Saigo and Raina [1] and Saigo [8] evaluated the generalized fractional integrals and derivatives given in § 23.2, note 18.6 of a general class of polynomials with essentially arbitrary coefficients of several elementary functions, and of the Bessel and the modified Bessel functions given in (1.83) and (1.84). A similar problem for the two fractional calculus operator introduced by R.K. Saxena and Kumbhat [2] and involving the Fox H-function was studied by Saigo, Kant and Koul [1]. 37.1 . A series of papers by Widder [3], Buschman [4], Khandekar [1], K .N. Srivastava [9,10], Rusia [1,5], C. Singh [1,2,4], B.K. Joshi [1], H.L. Gupta and Rusia [1] were concerned with the solution of special cases of (37.1) with the generalized Laguerre polynomials or with the Whittaker functions M1c in the kernel. Methods based on the Laplace transform or on reducing such equations to the Abel integral equation (2.1) were used. By using the Laplace transform S.D. Gupta [1] solved the equation
Lg(x)
11 (x)
z z J ( -t)(x - t)aL� ,, [(x- t)�']J(t)dt g(x), ( z) ea
0<
=
0
involving the generalized Laguerre polynomial L� , , Laplace transform by
a > 0, cf.
x < a,
in the kernel which is defined via the
Re(p - a ) >
0,
(37.19).
By using the Laplace transform H.M. Srivastava [3] obtained the inversion relation for the integral equation more general than (37.1) with the confluent hypergeometric function of several variables 00
L
� 2 ( ab · · · , ar ; b; zl t · · · , zr ) =
m t , . . . ,mr=O
( t)
( ar )mr z;n1 a m1 ( b)m1 + · · ·+mr m 1 ! • • •
He also indicated that this method can be applied to solving the general equation (4.2) in the case when the Laplace transform of the kernel Lk{p) is representable in the form Lk(p) = [(p - a) n (Lkt )(p)] - 1 where k1 ( is a certain function. 37.2. By using the Laplace transform Kalla [2] and T.N. Srivastava and Y.P. Singh [1) obtained the solution of the equations - see (37.2) - namely
x)
fz (x2 - t2 )" J, (.\(x2 - t2))e-b(z,-t ,)f(t)dt g(x), =
a
z
J t)" Jff {.\(x- t)�')J(t)dt (z -
=
g(x),
0
J11 {x)
J/:(x)
is the Bessel function defined in (1.83) and is the Bessel-Maintland function where (see § 23.2, note 18.2). The method of fractional integro-dift'erentiation was applied by Prabhakar [3] to solving the
§
39. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 7
integral equation
z:
j (x - t),8-tE:,,8 [�(x - t)]f(t)dt
= g(x),
787
Re P > 0,
a
and a similar equation with variable lower limit where
E: ,,8 (z) =
f: k!f.(�{�p), Re a > 0, is
k=O
the generalized Mittag-Lefler function. A method based on the Laplace transform was used by H.M. Srivastava and Buschman to find the solution of the most general convolution equation z:
J 0
I
]
Ap) f(t)dt = g(x) (x - t)a-t H;'' q" x - t (a(bt ,! ABt ),), .· ·. ·. ', (ap, ( b9 , B9) t
[
l
[2]
{39.22)
with the Fox H-function in the kernel. As examples, special cases of this equation with the generalized Wright function p\P 9 - 1 , a special case of the Meijer G-function of the form G ( x) and the generalized hypergeometric function pFp -1 were considered. In this connection we also point out the paper by Nair [1], who considered convolution equations with the generalized Wright function p'iPq and the generalized Bessel-Mailtand function JC(x). In the paper by H.M. Srivastava [2] a solution of the equation similar to (39.22) with variable lower and infinite upper limits was obtain by using the Mellin transform. Also, as special cases, the equations with the G-function of the form a;:t <x), with the generalized hypergeometric function of the form pF9 (x) , with the Whittaker function W>., (x) and with Bessel functions Jv(x), Kv(x) and Yv(x) l' were considered. 37.3 . Sonine (4, 5] (1884) and also [6, p. 151], proved that the operators in (4.2) and (4.21 ) with the kernels k( x )
_
- (2x
) P J-p(2i.fli} , -
� ;�
P -t Jp -t (2-.fii) )P l(x) = (2x) (2../XY -t ,
(2iy'ii) -P and their special cases with p = 1/2 of the form k(
X
-
Vii
) cos(2iJii) _
and also the operators with the kernels
'
< p < 1,
..j1rX
l(x) = cos(2Jii)
-
have the property given in
0
(39.23)
(39.24)
oo
(4.211) together with the fractional integro-dift'erentiation operators
k(x) = xa -t /r(a), l(x) = x-a fr(1 - a),
0
< a < 1.
After the quadratic changes of variables and functions
x = a + b2 - ( 2 , t = a + b2 - T 2 , 2i.J'Y = �� 2/(t) = ..J;F(T) , g (x) = G(()
7. (4.2) (4.2')
CHAPTER
788
the operators in
INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
and
with the kernels
{39.23)
have the fonn
0 which coincide with fonn
{37.41), (37.43) ! b
e
and the operators i n
cos(.\
(4.2')
1, {39.24)
with the kernels
have the
�) -rF(-r)d-r = G(e),
�
v •- -
c; 2
[1]
The authorship of the latter expression is attributed to D.S. Jones in some papers. 37.4 . Rozet obtained the inversion relation for the integral equation in under the appropriate assumptions on the kernel As an example he found relations for the solutions of the equations
[1]
{39.12) L2 (0,oo) K(.x, t). � Jn � J1 (2 ) ! � x t)n f(t)dt = (.x) t j(t)dt = g(z), ! ((v�) (37.68) = 0, (J+, = 2i. f)(.x) = g(.x) (37.67) =1 [4) 39.2, 37.11 (37.[1].67) (5.1) [1] f(.x) L2 (0, oo) .x"/2 JJ11 (2.../Xt)t-1112f(t)dt L2 (0, oo) [9,10]0. 0
X -
0
the first of which is the limiting ·case of with o ,\ The inversion relation for the non-convolution equation given in in the case o was obtained by Mackie example of more general result (see § note below). By using the non-convolution operators given in differentiation operators defined in and (5.8), Soni characterization of the space of functions
when v > Lowndes investigated properties of the operators
where
m
is the positive integer for which
0
� o, ,\ � <
O,A
such that
E
0
o
9
+
'
with the operator The paper by Soni is an and the fractional integro solved the problem of the 00
E
0
0,
+m �
1,
and of the operators li). ('1, o ) defined
§ 39. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER
(1.83) J(1.01_814), (37.68). [1101] _1 ,
by the above relations with being replaced by functions given in and cf. 37�5. In the paper by Pollard and Widder applied to finding the solution of the equation
J k(x - t)f(t)dt �
=
where
7
J11 (z) 111 (z) and
789 are the Bessel
the method of operational calculus
was
g(x), x > 0,
(u > 0) of which is connected with the solution of the heat the kernel k(u) = Aiu exp ( u of this equation is expressed in tenns of the Riemann-Liouville fractional equation. The solution integro-differentiation operators of order 37.6. Let and be the operators in and and let Lp , v :: Lp([O, oo) ; x"P - 1 ) be the weighted space. H � oo, then the operators and respectively. H a.re bounded in Lp , v when 11 + and 11 > then 0 + and a.re bounded in Lp , v if 11 + + and 11 > respectively - Heywood and Rooney and Heywood 37.7. Following the papers by Prabhaka.r and using q-fractional integrals (see § note Prabhalcar and Chakrabarty obtained the inversion relations for the q-integral analogue of with 1F1 being replaced by the basic confluent hypergeometric function 1� 1 in the kernel (see Slater 37.8. Pinney considered the integral equation 0
- fu-) J>. ('l,a) R>. ('l,a)1/2. a 1/2, 1 <(37.p 4<5) (37.46) J>.('l,a) <, a)2 2'1R>. ('l,a) - 27}, 2a), << min(1, a < 1/2,2/p)R2/(1>. ('l,a) 2a) < p < 2/(1 J>.('l max(1,2/p) - 2a - 27}, [1] (32a]. 2'1 23.2, 18.1 5) (37.1) [1] [1,2] [1][1]).
J p(t)rp( .jx2 t2)dt f(x), 00
+
=
x > 0,
(39.25)
0
and found its solution
rp(x) �-!.x �dx J f( .jx2 t2)q(t)dt r/2 p(x) q(x) J p( rp (4.2") (4.2). also 00
+
0
provided that for a function
there exists the function
such that
r cos
)q( r sin
rp)drp 1
for any r > 0. He also obtained sufficient conditions for the truth of the latter relation, which is an analogue of for the Sonine equation He considered the following special case: 0
=
where
is the generalized Legendre function - the Legendre polynomial L;11(z) for the natural 11 particular, - tl -2p as 11 - 0, and
p(t)
where if I' =
J1/2. -I' (z)
0
p(t) = t1 -I'J_11(at), < Rei' < 1, p(t) t1 -21', < Rei' < 1, (1.83); (39.25) p(t)
= n.
In
at
i s the Bessel function of the first kind given i n i n particular, = cos In the case = 0 the connection of with the Abel
CHAPTER 7. INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS
790
equation ( 2.1 ) was shown and when
J
00
37.9 . Soni
[3]
cos
p(t) at (39.25) � f(t)dt g(x), x > t-x = cos
was reduced to the equation
=
0.
found the integral representation
J(x- t)"12J, [2Vk(x- t)]f(t)dt X
/2 ] <x-t) " [ d Jt Jo[2 Vk(t- T)]j(T)dT dt k" r(v + ) dt 0
z
=
]
-
1
for the operators of the fonn (37.4) , and proved the necessary and sufficient conditions of solvability in for the equation 0
0
L2 (-oo,oo)
d� J Jo[2 Vk(x-t)]f(t)dt g(x), -oo x oo, z
<
=
- oo
<
and obtained its solution in the fonn
f(x) .!!._dx J Jo[2 Vk(t-x))g(t)dt. 00
=-
Soni
[3]
also investigated the conditions for the uniqueness of the solution of the equation
d� J Jo[2 Vk(x- t))f(t)dt g(x), a > -oo, L2 (a,+oo),L (a, +oo). (g ::: 2 [ ] [1] K:(x, t) J(T2 - b2 )r 7"-m-n-l Jm (xT)Jn (tT)dT. z
=
in because the corresponding homogeneous equation 0) can have a non-trivial solution in Similar investigations were done for the operators with variable lower limit - see also Bouwkamp 1 . By using the method of representation via the composition of two equations of the fonn (37.4) , Williams solved (39.11 ) with the kernel a
00
=
b
J, (x)
We note here that other integral equations with the Bessel function in the kernel considered on the whole line arise in applications. Two such equations can be obtained from 40.26) and 40.27) if we carry out differentiation with respect to y for y = 0 and take 40.45 ) and (40.44) into account in the fonner relation and if we set y = 0 and take (40.32 ) and (40.47) into account in the latter relation. Then for 1J. = 0 after the substitution = with IPI < 1/ , ¢. 0, we obtain the relations
( p
(
T(x) l2g(x)
(
2
39. 7 791 00 ( j It � �2P J-p (.\. lt - xl)dt g(x), x oo 00 sign(t -x) d v(x) - -211" J It- 1 1 2p dt [g(t)Jp-1 ( .\.lt -xl)]dt, J,(z) (37.8). g(x). Kv(z) (1.85) and [Yv(z) 2, 7.2.1]. 21 9. 1 [ 1 ] Jv is Kv Yv:(37.4) j(t- x)(v - 1)/2Kv(2Vf=X)J(t)dt g(x), 00 j(t-x)(v - 1)12Yv(�../t -x)f(t)dt g(x). §
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER
=
-oo
<
<
oo ,
-
ctgrnr
=
X
- oo
-
where is the Bessel-Klifford function _given in One may check that the second relation inverts the first under appropriate assumptions on the function 37.10. Let be the Macdonald function defined in let be the Bessel function of the second kind - Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi By using the Mellin transform and results and 20 from Table V.K. Vanna found the solution of equations similar to with variable lower and an infinite upper limits, in which replaced by and by 00
=
�
=
�
37.1 1. By using the method of reducing to a boundary value problem for the partial differential equations
a2r.p c(x,11)r.p 0, c(x,11) c(11,x), r.p(x,O) f(x), x 0, -axa11 (39.26) r.p(0,11) -!(11), 11 0, x 0, 11 (1] a a J K:(x, t)g(t)dt f(x), g = !.2 ( ax"" - a11r.p ) I (39.26) 40.2. K:(x,t) R(x,x;t,O) (37.67) R(x,xo;t,to) 1 +
=
=
>
=
in the first quadrant
>
> 0 Mackie
>
=
obtained a solution of the integral equation
�
�= '11
=
0
where = As examples
and with a =
is the Riemann function of and the equations
�
Definition
�
j Pn (x/t)r.p(t)dt g(x), j Pn (t/x)r.p(t)dt = g(x) Pn (z) (5] =
0
in the kernels were solved, cf. the equation considered the equations 0
with the Legendre polynomials 37.1 2. Prabh.akar �
J a
(x �(c)t)c-1
�t (a, b;
c; 1 -xft, .\.(x- t))j(t)dt = g(x),
(39.3).
a < x < {3,
(39.27)
7. fz (x �(c)t)c-1 �1 (a, c; 1 - tfx, -X(x- t))f(t)dt g(x), x (39.28) �0,1 (a, c(39.x, 2)7) (39.28) (10.64), 0,(35.1) (35.2), 0 (39.27) (39.28) (37.1). 1 f(x) e�zx-61;:;.e-�zxbI!+cg(x), f(x) I!+ce�zxb I;;:;.e-�zx-6g(x) � (2.17). [6) (39.27) (39.28}
792
CHAPTER
INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS =
b;
0t
<
< (3,
a
b ; ; y is the Humbert function given in where 0t > (3 < oo . In particular, if ,\ = then and coincide with the Love equations and and if b = they then coincide with the equations of the form Prabhakar found the criterion of solvability for and in L (at, (3) and obtained their solutions in the form
=
=
respectively. Here ] + is the Riemann-Liouville fractional integro-difl'erentiation operator defined in Similar results were proved by Prabhakar for the equation of the form and with variable lower and finite upper limits and for more general equations. For example, for the equation
(h(t) ��!;)]c-1 �1 (a, c; 1 - ��;:, -X(h(x) -h(t))) /(t)dh(t) g(x), Jz m' 0 h(t) h(t) e C00(at, {3], h'(t) (39.0.6) t 0 h(t) (37.1). (1] I-oooo k(x- t)f(t)dt g(x) k(x) "2k -iIioooo (l(t)] -1 ezt dt l(t) (2.1), (1] (39.1) (39.4) (1] (37.60} (37.61), (37. 4 7) (23.5} (23.6). (1] z (39.29) J(x- t)n Im (x-t)f(t)dt g(x), 0, 0, (1.84) Im (z) (39.29). (39.239.9) 1 , 36.0,1 1, 2, ... (39.29)0,1,2, ... - 1, - 2, . . . 0. (1] 37. 1 5 � (37.107). (37.109) (1,2] (37. 1 41} [1-3]. fJ
=
b;
Ot < X < (3,
where > In particular we note that if ,\ = and = then the latter equation is reduced to and if b = and = t, then it is reduced to 37.1 3. Tanno investigated the inversion problem for the convolution integral transforms =
where
=
and
is a meromorphic function
with real zeroes and poles. He also considered such a problem for more general transforms. The book by Hirschman and Widder should be consulted in this connection. As examples, solutions of the Abel equation the Higgins equation and the equation of the form were obtained. 37.14. R.K. Saxena and Sethi found the operational relations similar to and and connected the generalized Hankel transform operator given in with the modifications of the operators in and 37.15. Tedone considered the integral equation
=
m
�
m
+n �
a
with the modified Bessel function given in in the kernel. On the basis of properties of the function he proved some difference-recurrence relations for the operator in This was used to reduce the solution of with m, n = to the successive solutions of simpler equations with m = n = 0 - § Note to - and the differential equation. Also was reduced to the solution of the Volterra integral equation with a difference kernel if m = , m +n > ,n= 37.1 6. Yakubovich, Vu Kim Than, Marichev and Kalla proved a theorem similar to Theorem in the space L2(R ) and considered the special cases of the W-transform given in The Kontorovich-Lebedev transform defined in and the Mehler-Fock transform given in of generalized functions were investigated by Glaeske and Glaeske and Hess
§ 39. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 38.1. When investigating the special case of equation
(38.1 )
Lebedev
[2]
7
793
obtained the Shlemil'ch
�/2 J� r2 -t2 : - j cp(r cos O)dO g(r) 1/2 [1]. 2 18.2. 0, [3] (38.1) (1.83), ak · [1] 0 (38.1) 0. r
=
0
0
containing the fractional integral of order by the function x - § The inversion relation of this equation was used by Lebedev and UO.yand 38.2. In the case G = p = v Tranter represented the solution of as a series 00
ak Jv+2k+n [1)
(x) of Bessel functions given in and as a result he reduced this problem to k :O solving the infinite system of linear equations with respect to Cook used the integral analogue of such a method and reduced this system to Fredholm's integral equation of the second kind. Nasim and Aggarwala suggested a method for solving based on its decomposition into two systems of more simple dual equations with F(x) = and G(x) = studied the problem of the uniqueness for the solution of the dual 38.3. Walton equation in the space of generalized functions. 38.4. Buschman and Kesarvani indicated that by using the Erdelyi-Kober-type fractional integration operators given in and and the Mellin transform defined in the dual integral equation with = and the dual integral equation with Meijer G-functions in the kernel, respectively can be reduced to a single equations of the same form given on the half-line oo ) . By using the Mellin transform Nasim and Sneddon investigated dual equations with kernels of general form. As an example, dual equations of the form with different Bessel functions and trigonometric functions in the kernels were considered. 38.5. By using two-dimensional analogues of Erdelyi-Kober operators - § (note - Makarenko studied dual and triple integral equations with Bessel functions in the kernels. Using the method in Example Virchenko and Gamaleya considered the system of dual equations of the form 38.6. By using fractional integra-differentiation Sethi and Banerji reduced equations more general than to the Fredholm equation of the second kind. 38.7. The system of dual equations associated with the Mehler-Fock transform and reduced to when p and H(-r) = th-r1r/-r was first investigated by Grinchenko and Ulitko Using fractional integrals of order by the function chx, they reduced such a system to the Fredholm integral equation of the second kind. Two systems with the same kernels and two systems with trigonometric kernels were solved by Babloyan by using a similar method. A system of the form with the integer 1J was first investigated by Ruhovets and UO.yand These results were developed by Virchenko and Makarenko We also note the paper by Lebedev and Skal'skaya who studied the system with p and H(-r) of a special form and obtained the equation with the Gauss hypergeometric function
L:
(1.1 12)
(38.1) [1,2[]6] [0,
[1]
[1].(38.22) =0
[61] ) (18.7) (18. (38.1) R(t) 0
[1]
(38.16). 38.2 (38.16) g= =0 1/2
[1] (1].
(38.1)
(1]
[1].
29.2
24.2)
[1]
(38.22)
[1]
j ;<� t =l'l (a,-a;�;1 - �) dt=g(x) 1 [2] 35.1)
(38.22)
�
instead of fractional integrals. They used the result by Love (§ for the inversion of the last equation. Investigating three dual equations with the generalized associated Legendre function in the kernel Virchenko used the inversion relation for the more general equation with the Gauss hypergeometric function
[1]
7. (a b chx-cht ) dt = g(x), tp(t)(chx cht)c chx+d J mare [2] = j
794
CHAPTER z:
INTEGRAL EQUATIONS WITH SPECIAL FUNCTIONS -1
�1
, ; c;
c
> 0.
a
S.P. Pono nko considered the system of dual equation of matrix type P#' (Aj (r)'IP(r)) j and using she reduced this system to a system of Fredholm equations of the second kind. Together with the equations similar equations associated with the inverse Kontoro vich-Lebedev transform were considered in some papers. Dual and triple integral equations of such a type were investigated by Lowndes and the former equation was studied as the limiting case of the latter equation. One case of dual equations was solved in closed form, and other ones were reduced to the Fredholm integral equation of the second kind. 38.8. Equation generalize the systems from the papers by Cook and Borodachev and intersect with the system from the paper by S.P. Ponomcu-enko All these systems are reduced to Fredholm equations of the second kind by using Erdelyi-Kober-type operators. 38.9. Virchenko and Makarenko and Makarenko considered dual and triple integral equations with kernels more general than namely the Watson function - § (note above. These equations were reduced to Fredholm equations of the second kind. 38.10. The method given in § (Example was used by Yirchenko to find the inversion relations for two dual equations with the functions �1 and in the kernels, -by their reduction to the equation A f g where A is the operator in § (note 38.1 1. K .N . Srivastava and Virchenko and Romashchenko considered triple integral equations of the form with 0 and arbitrcu-y respectively. The result from the paper by Pathak was generalized in the latter paper. By using the Erdelyi-Kober operators given in and Lowengrub and Walton and Walton reduced the system of triple equations of the form to a system of generalized Abel integral equations - § (note Lowndes and Srivastava reduced a certain class of triple series equations involving the generalized Laguerre polynomials. to the triple integral equations of the form and obtained an exact solution of these triple series equations. 38.12. Quadruple and n-tuple integral equations were considered in some papers. Using the in method of Cooke Ahmad investigated the 4-tuple equations with the functions the kernels. The method used in § when solving the system was applied by Dwivedi and Trivedi to similar triple and quadruple equations. A further generalization was made by Vu Kim Tuan who considered n-tuple equations with the Meijer G-function in the kernels of the form
[1]
[2],
[1] 38.1
[5]
.:!_dx J xaPm+·'li·++ll ,q; +m+l (xy I (bmo, ()a, ;)<4-, (ep), -) 1 ) J(y)dy - ·(x) x .:!_dx J GPm;;+,ll++ll,q+m;+l (xy 1 (b1,tn(a,, )),, (dC4J q ),O ) f(y)dy - g, (x), •
00
9 a
•
0
Jv(z)
(38.16) '
00
_
.
0
[0,
where 0 < a o < a 1 < · · · < an - 1 < an = oo is the disjunction of the half-line oo) into intervals, 9i ( are the given functions and the remaining parameters satisfy the appropriate assumptions. Vu Kim Tuan proved that this system is solvable in the space f( E L2 (0, oo) if and only if 9i E L2( ai- l , ai i = 2, . . , n. In this case a unique solution was found in closed form. Vu Kim Tuan used the methods from the papers by Fox and R.K. Saxena where solutions of dual equations with functions more general than the Fox H-function in the kernels were formally constructed, and the Erdelyi-Kober operators were applied.
x)
), 1,
.
[4)
x)
[3,4]
Chapter 8 . Applicat ions t o D ifferent ial Equations In this chapter we shall be concerned with the applications of fractional integro differentiation to the investigation of partial differential equations of the Euler Poisson-Darboux-type, and of ordinary differential equations of fractional and integer order. In particular, the Cauchy, Dirichlet and Neumann singular initial value problems are solved in closed form, and the existence and uniqueness theorems for certain types of differential equations of fractional order are proved. The resulting solutions have wide applications to 'fiicomi-type boundary value problems for partial differential equations of the mixed type.
§ 40. Integral Representations for the Solution of Partial Differential Equations of Second Order via Analytic Functions and Their Applications to Boundary Value Problems The present section deals with certain aspects of the general theory of elliptic equations with anaJytic coefficients as developed in the book by Vekua [3] ( 1948), and their applications to the so-called generalized Helmholtz two-axially symmetric equation. We prove that if the Erdelyi-Kober operator I, , a defined in ( 18.8), and the generalized Erdelyi-Kober operator J). ( fJ, o:) defined in (37.45) are applied to analytic functions in each variable, then we obtain the solutions of the above Helmholtz equation. These results are applied to the solution of certain boundary value problems.
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
796
40. 1 . Preliminaries Let there be given the following general homogeneous partial differential equations of the second order with two independent variables and with analytic coefficients
Ht u u�� - Uyy + A t (x , y)u� + Bt (x , y)uy + Ct (x , y)u = 0 , Ku u�� + Uyy + A(x , y)u� + B (x , y) uy + C(x , y)u = 0, =
=
(40.1) (40.2) (40.3)
and equations of the form
(40.4) H* v ve, - (a(e, 71)v)e - (b(e, 71)v), + c(e, 71)V = 0, (40.5) K* v v�� + Vyy - (A(x , y) v)� - (B (x , y) v)y + C(x , y)v = 0, conjugate to (40.1) and (40.3). Generally speaking we assume that the complex variables x , y , e and 71 are connected with each other by the relations =
=
e = X + iy, 71 = X - iy, x = <e + 71)/2 , y = <e - 71)/2i. We denote by ( the number conjugate to e and note that ( = case when and are real..
x
y
(40.6) 71 holds only in the
We introduce the differential operators
(40.7) In particular, the following formal relation is obvious namely
(40.8) where d 2 is two-dimensional
Laplacian.
§ 40. INTEGRAL REPRESENTATIONS FOR THE SOLUTION
If the coefficients of
797
(40.1)-(40.3) are connected with each other by the relations
4a(e, TJ) } = A (e + '1 , e 4b(e, '1) 2 2i
'�
)
±
'.B ( e +2 '1 , e 2i-
'�
), (40.9)
A t (z, y) = A(z, -iy), B t (z, y) = iB(z, -iy),
(40.10)
Ct (z, y) = C(z, -iy),
(40.1)-(40.3) (40.3).
(40.4)-(40.5), (40.6) e, TJ, (40.1), (40.4)
then and respectively can be transformed into each other by the changes given in and replacing y by iy, while becomes Nevertheless, for real z and y the above equations are classified in the following way. Equations and are called hyperbolic-type equations in the first and second canonical forms, respectively, and and are called elliptic-type equations. Let = z + iy be a point lying in a certain simply connected domain i) in the complex plane C, z and y themselves may be complex. Then we denote by f> a domain containing the point '1 connected with by ( Further we denote by (i), f>) a (Cartesian) product of i) and f> called a cylindrical domain. We introduce the following definition:
(40.5)
(40.2)
(40.2)
(40.3)
e
40.6).
e
A simply connected domain i) in the complex plane C is called a basic domain of (.lO. l} and {40. 9} if their coefficients a, b, are analytic with respect to variables (e, '1) E (i), f>), the functions A, B, C are analytic in (z, y) E i) and the relations in (.l0. 9} hold.
Definition 40.1.
c
We indicate the most important representation relations via analytic functions for the solution of ( which will widely used below in special cases. First such a relation uses the concept of a Riemann function.
40.3),
solution v = R(e, '1) = R(e, TJ;eo, TJo) of the Goursat boundary value problem for the conjugate equation (40.4) with the conditions
Definition 40.2. A
,
R le=eo = exp j a(eo, t)dt, flo
(
R l,=,o = exp j b( Eo
r, '10
)dr
(
40.11)
798
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
is called the Riemann function of the operator H given in (40. 1} corresponding to the point ({o , 7Jo ) E �.
We note the following properties of the Riemann function: a) if a, b E C 1 (�), c E C(�), then the Riemann function R of the operator H in the domain � exists and it is an unique; b) the relations R,({o, 7J) = a({o , 7J)R({o , 7J) and Re ({, f}o) = b({, 7Jo )R({, 7Jo) hold on the characteristics e = {o and 7J = f}o ; c) the normalization condition R({o , f}o ; {o , 7Jo ) = 1 holds; d) the reciprocity condition R* ({, 7Ji {o , 7Jo ) = R({o, f}o ; {, 7J) is valid, i.e. the function R({, 7J j {o, 7Jo ) with respect to the last variables {o and 7Jo is the Riemann function R* of the conjugate equation (40.4) corresponding to the point {, '1 · More detailed information about the Riemann function and its tables in different special cases of equations of the form (40.1) may be found in the books by Babich, Kapilevich, Mihlin, Natanson and others [1), Kosljakov, Gliner and Smirnov [1] and in the paper by Andreev, Volkodavov and Shevchenko [1]. Other references are also cited there. The following statement is true - Vekua [3, p. 31).
Let � be a certain basic domain of {40.9). Then all solutions of � - that is, those expanded in the Taylor's series in V can be represented in the fonn
Theorem 40.1. (40. 3) regular in
-
e
j ()(t)R(t, 7Jo i {, ()dt j ()*(r)R({o , r; {, ()dr, e
u(x, y) = o:o R({o, 7Jo ; {, () +
+
eo
q
({o , 7Jo ) E ( � , i>).
o
(40.12)
Here ao is a certain constant and ()({) and ()* ( 7J) are certain functions analytic in and � respectively, and uniquely defined by means of u(x, y) provided that the relations in (4 0. 6) hold.
�
The following statement gives several similar integral representations for the solution of (40.3) by means of functions satisfying conditions simpler than those for the Riemann function.
Let -y({, 7J , 9) be a function analytic in the cylinder (V, D, D) where D is a certain basic domain of (40. 1}, and let this function satisfy {40. 1} with respect to { and '1· Let in addition
u(x, y) =
j -y({, (, 9)
L
(40.13)
§ 40. INTEGRAL REPRESENTATIONS FOR THE SOLUTION
799
along any closed contour L lying in � satisfies {40. 9} provided that the conditions in {40. 6) and {40. 9} hold. If in addition the relation�
[ a811 -r(e, Ji� [ :e 1 <e .
lim B-e
7J ,
0) +
o )] H(e . .,h<e . .,, 11>]
.,, II)
a(e, 71)-r(e,
7J ,
=
0,
{40.14)
=
o,
{40.15)
respectively hold, then the integrals of the form e
j -r(e, (, O)
u(x, y) =
{40.16)
eo
(
u(x, y) =
j -r(e, (, O)
{40.17)
(o
respectively, where eo lies on the boundary of �' are regular solutions of (40. 9} in �.
40.2 with the conditions e = X + y, e = X - y, and the conditions in {40.10) instead of those in {40.6) and {40.9) is also true with respect to {40.2). In this case the conditions for the functions -r {e,(,O ) and
Remark 40.1. Theorem
analytic may by weakened up to the existence of their continuous derivatives of the second order. Remark 40.2. The following functions
e
R(O, e, 71), 7Jo E � ; f R(t, e, 71)(t - O) a- t dt, 71o ;
71o ;
9
-r {e,
0,
0) satisfying the conditions in Theorem
40.2. If A, B and C are analytic in �, then any solution of {40.3)
are two examples of a function
7J ,
regular in � is also analytic in � with respect to x and y .
Theorem 40.3.
Re o >
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
800
40.2. The representation of solutions of generalized Helmholtz two-axially symmetric equation In this subsection we obtain different integral representations for the solutions of two mutually connected cases of and namely the generalized
(40.3}
(40.2},
Helmholtz two-axially symmetric equation
HP>. ,.u =•r
Uzz
+ Uyy +
2p
-Uz
Z
+
2p + � 2 u = -u 11 Y
0,
p, p, � - const ,
(40.18}
and the corresponding hyperbolic equation
(40.19} (40.18}
obtained from after replacing y by -iy. We also consider some special inversion relations for above equations. In the special case J.l = � = is the so-called equation of axially symmetric potential theory. This is discussed in more detail in § and § Notes to §§ and Here we only note that itself arises, with the special values z = X, y = p = m - and = n - if we need to find the monochromatic solution of the form
0 (40.18}
41.1
41.2.
Y, 2
1
Y,
(40.18) 2p 1,
41.1
43.1,
Y}e±i>.t,
u = u(X , t ) = u 1 (X, X 2 = z� + z� + . . . + z� , Y 2 = y� + y� + . . . + y� for the D 'Alambert wave equation
(40.19'} }
in the space with co-ordinates ( z 1 , z 2 , . . . , Zm , Yt , Y2 , . . . Yn and time t. The possibility of an effective construction of the solution of is enabled by two remarkable properties of the operator H;, 11 • There are "the relations of conformity"
(40.18}
(40.20} Hp>.,p (yt - 2p u) = yt - 2p H1>.-p,p u, and a compositional representation for the solution of (40.18} by means of the Erdelyi-Kober operators, defined in (18. 8 } and (37.45}, of harmonic functions even
§ 40. INTEGRAL -REPRESENTATIONS FOR THE SOLUTION
801
x and y. This representation follows from the relation J(z)/ /J J(Y )/ p J(z){ O 0) .u.A / = Hp,..x IJ I(z)/ /J J(Y)1/ p J(z){O 0) / (40.21) - 1 2, - 1 2, - 1 2, - 2 , where the indices x and y in the above operators imply a variable to which these operators are applied. According to (40.20) each solution of (40.18) corresponds to another solution of this equation obtained from by replacing I' by 1 I', or p by 1 p, and by multiplying by x1 - 2�-' ,or y1 2P respectively. It follows from (40.21) that if f is harmonic, i.e. satisfies the Laplace equation �/ = 0, then the function u = n;,"' I�{1 2 . "' I�{1 2 ,p Jiz>(o, 0) / is the solution of ( 40.18). Similar properties are also true for {40.19). Equations {40.20) is easily verified by direct evaluation. Equation {40. 2 1) can be proved as a direct corollary of Lemmas 40.1-40.2 given below. These lemmas in
.X
'
'
.X
u
-
-
'
u
-
,
characterize the application of the Erdelyi-Kober-type operators to the differential operator
{40.22) 40.3
These lemmas as well as Lemma below were proved in the papers by Lowndes and Notes to and and 5, - see also Erdelyi note
[7, 9) 40.1.
Lemma 40.1.
[8, 10)
§ 43.1,
§§ 40.2
40.3
§ 43.2 ,
Let f(x) E C2 {0, b), b > 0, and /{0) = /"{0) = 0. Then
Let a > 0, f E C2 {0, b), b > 0, x2" + 1 f(x) is integrable at zero, and x2"+ 1 /'(x) -+ 0 as x -+ 0. Then
Lemma 40.2.
and, in particular, if A = 0, then I, , a L�z)f(x) = L�1.a i, ,a f(x).
Let a > 0, f(x) E C2 (0, b), b > 0, and z" + k f(k)(z) with k = 0, 1, 2 are integrable at zero. Then
Lemma 40.3.
802
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
where la , >. is the operator obtained from the operator in (37.68) by replacing i by
J.
[9] proved that by using Lemma 40.3 we can find the full system of (40.18) in a neighbourhood of the origin in the form
Lowndes solutions of
z = r cos O,
y = r sin O,
An - const , n =
0, 1, 2, . . . ,
(40.23)
where J,(z) is the Bessel function given in and P�a , b ) (z) is the Jacobi polynomial - Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi Lowndes used the known result for with � = obtained by the method of division of variables in polar coordinates. In particular, we also note that in the case of the system in has the form Anr-PJn+p(�r)C�(cos O) and An r"C�(cos O), where C� (z) are Gegenbauer polynomials if I' = and I' = � = respectively. However, to find integral representations for the solutions of ( it is more suitable to use another approach based on Theorem and We denote by y, a special solution of connected with the solution 1(e, fJ , t) from Theorem by means of Using the relation in and its special cases when I'P� = we can conclude that this solution should be found in the form
{1.83),
(40.18)
0
(40.23)
f(z, t) 40.2 0,
[2, 10.8].
(40.18)
0
40.2 (40.21)
(40.18) (40.6).
0, 40.18) (40.21).
(40.24) where x = -pf ( y = -�2 p/ , p = - t) 2 + y2 , and a , b, c must be defined. Substituting into and carrying out some operations we arrive at an equation in partial derivatives of second order with respect to O(x, y) . This equation is a linear combination of two equations of the form from Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi with (J = 32 and the coefficients z - 2 and � 2 in two cases only connected by means of namely + {J = 1 = p; = o: c = o:{J b = a= p p b = c = -p, o:{J = a= o: + {J = 1, 1 = - p. So we conclude that O(z, y) = 32 (o:, {J; 1; x, y) where
4zt), (40.24)
1) 2)
,
-p , 1 - 2 , -p , 0,
4 (40.18)
(z
[1], (40.20): 1, p(1 - p), p(1 - p),
5.9(29)
1, 1
l z l < 1,
(40.25)
is one of the Humbert confluent hypergeometric functions with the parameters o: = I' and {J = I' · Integral representations for such a function in terms of the Legendre function P;(z) = P,(z) given in and the Bessel-Clifford function
1-
(1.79),
803
§ 40. INTEGRAL REPRESENTATIONS FOR THE SOLUTION
given in
(37.8) were obtained by Kapilevich [1 , p. 1243] in the form
82 (1!, 1 -
1
Jl ; "'( ;
x, y) =('Y - 1) f( 1 - tp - 2 P_ 11 ( 1 - 2xt) 0
X
J..,. - 2(2y'(l -
t)y)dt,
(40.25')
Re"'( > 1.
can It should be noted that if < 11 ;/; then the variable x = be on a cut - a singular line - of the Humbert function. To exclude this we multiply the special solution in with the parameters indicated in 1 ) by the piecewise constant multiplier 1 ) lsign 11 l , where 0° �1 , 11 is a constant. Then we integrate the expression obtained respect to the parameter in accordance with As a result we find the function
xt 0, 0 (40.24) ltr(t) lt l" (signxt +
-p/(4xt)
t
(40.13).
U
t + 1 ) 1sign l'l (z, y) _1 IX 1 _ , y1 _ 2p /00 r(t)((zlt l" -(signx t)2 + y2]l-P -
1
-oo
Similarly on the basis of
(40.26)
2) we obtain the second function
u(x, y) =lt lzl
_ 11
+ 1)1s•gn. l'l f00 v(t) lt l "(signxt [(x - t)2 + y2]P
-oo
(40.18)
(40.27)
which is obviously the solution of as well as the first one. We note that if and p = - 1 , . . . and p = 1, . respectively, then the functions in are not defined, and a special approach is required to constructing solutions in these cases. One may satisfy oneself by direct verification that the constructed solutions of the form satisfy the corresponding condition in Therefore on the basis of and Remark after replacing by and the interval -oo < < oo by < < < = in we obtain the function
0, -2, (40.27)
2, . .
(40.24) (40.14). (40.16) 40 . 1 y -iy t 0 x-y t x+y, t x+Oy (40.26)
(40.26)
804
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
U
1 (x,y) =I3X- p j (1T(x- ()+2)O1y)-P (X + y)P -1 (}
(40.28) (40.19) when p 0. y iy in (40.28) we arrive at the relation u(x, y) = - i(2i) 1-2P /3x- P J T(u) u1A (e - e - 1 ) 2P- 1
which satisfy the hyperbolic equation Making the inverse replacement by
>
L
u = x + iycostp, which after the change (}
= y cos
tp
(40.29)
can be also rewritten in the form
u(x, y) =13x - P yl y i -2P j T(x + iO)(x + i0)1A (y2 - 02 )P- 1 y
-y
(40.26)-(40.30)
In order that the above integrals in may exist , the functions and 11 must satisfy certain conditions given below and in the theorems of the next subsection. It should be noted that the integral operators in these expressions are compositions of the form I�z{1 2 , p iC:{1 2 .p Jfe\O , O f which will be observed below while investigating their boundary values. From the above arguments we arrive at the following statement.
T
) - (40.2 1) -
p
Let p 0 and � 0 and let T(z) be an analytic function of z = x + iy in the neighbourhood of z = 0 and let it be an even function of x and y, i.e. T(z) = T(z), T( -z) = T(z), ReT is an even function of x and y, ImT is an odd function of x and y, and ImT = 0 when xy = 0. Then (40.29) and (40.30) give all the classic solutions u E C2 of (40.18) in the neighbourhood of (0, 0) even of x and y for which u(x, ±0) is bounded. When 0 < p < 1/2 and 0 < < 1/2 respectively, then the relations u,(x, 0) = 0, or more exactly u,(x, y) = O(y), and z ( , y) = 0, Theorem 40.4.
>
p
U
O
§ 40. INTEGRAL REPRESENTATIONS FOR THE SOLUTION
or more exactly ux (x, y) = O(x), respectively, are true. If in addition
805 ·
(40.31) [ (p 1/2)] - 1 = r(p + 1/2)[y'?rr(p)] - 1 , then the functions given in (40.28)-{40.30) satisfy the Dirichlet condition 13 = B ,
u(x, 0) = r(x)
(40.32) and u(x, y) = r(x) + O(y2 ) as y -... 0. If r(z) has singularities at the points z = z1 and z = -z1 , then ±zt, ±z1 are singular points for the solution u(x, y) given in (40.29), (40.30) too. proof of the basic conclusions of this theorem can be found in the book by Gilbert The condition in can be verified directly by the passage to the in limit as and Theorem shows that the operator in maps analytic functions into solutions of In the general case its inverse operator was constructed as a cumbersome series by Gilbert p. As far as the special case JJ = A = is concerned, such an operator can be found explicitly in a relatively simple way Gilbert Next we prove that other special cases of the inverse operator - when can be constructed in closed form. JJ A = Case A. Let JJ = > 0. We assume that = Then with the condition in has the form
The
[2]. y -... 0 (40.28) 40.4 (40.18).
(40.32) (40.29).
(40.29)
[2, 205-206].
0
(1]. 0-
0, p r(z) r(z). (40.30) (40.31) 1 - 2p 11 u(., , y) = B(p, 1/2) 1 T(., + iy)(y2 - 0 2 y>- 1 Jp - t (>..jy• - o•)dO -y
1r- 1 /2 f(p + 1/2)Ji'> ( -1/2,p)Rer(x + iy) = 1r- 1 / 2 r(p + 1/2)y 1 - 2p ( qt /)( w), (40.33) /(t) = Rer(x + h/i)t - 1 1 2 , w = �, where J, (z) is the Bessel-clifford function given in (37.8), Ji' > (fJ, a) and c�:: are the operators in (37.45) and (37.4) applied with respect to the second variable. Using the inversion relations of these operators given in (37.57) and (37.37) we =
806
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
obtain the following representation for the operator inverse to ( 40.33): Re
T(z + iy) = J;rr- 1 (p + 1/2)JJf>(p- 1/2 -p) ,
X
_
lm -p - t ( � Jy2 t 2 ) -
( 1 dtd ) m (t2P- 1 u(z, t))tdt. t
( 40.34)
Now the corresponding statement follows from Theorem 37.2.
Let g(y) = u(z, V"Y)yP- 1 12 E ACm ([O, b]), b < oo for all z and g(O) = g'(O) = = g(m - l ) (O) = 0 and 0 < p < m. Then each solution u(z, y) of (40. 18) with Jl = 0 corresponds by {40.94) to a certain hannonic function Re T (z + iy). If u(z, y) is an even function of z and y, then ReT ( z + i y) is also an even function of z and y and the relation T(i) = T( z) holds for the corresponding analytic function T( z) . Case B. Let � = 0, p > O.We assume that an even function u is given on the boundary r of the unit disk l z l � 1:
Theorem 40.5.
· · ·
u(z, y) lr = /(
r = {z = cos so ,
!( so) = !(- so ) = !(1r - so) , By substituting = z + i y = e i �P, z + i (J = t in at the following integral equation:
z
- �-� , y , 2 - 2p
y = sin so , I�PI � ?r }, It'
:F ±1rj2.
(40.35)
(40.30) and using (40.35) we arrive
z
� ayB(p, 1/2) J T(t)t�-' [(z - t)(z - t)]P - l ( ( z - t)(t - i) ) dt = /{ so) , x 2 F1 JJ, 1 - JJ;p ; z
2t(z + z)
( 40.36)
i
Integration in ( 40.36) is taken along the vertical interval joining the points and This interval can be replaced by a segment of a circle r of the form t = ei a , l a l � so , since T(t) is analytic in the unit disk and other integrands are analytic everywhere except the points t = 0, oo lying on the boundary or beyond the corresponding segment of a circle. According to the Cauchy theorem, the value
z.
z, i,
§ 40. INTEGRAL REPRESENTATIONS FOR THE SOLUTION
807
of the integral is unchanged for such a replacement of the contour of integration. In order to choose a single-valued branch of (40.36) with respect to the variable z we make a cut along the half-line y = 0, z =:; 0 and set I 'P I < 1r. Then [(z - t)(i - t)]P - 1 = [2t( cos a - cos
'P T(eia)eia(p+p) F (p, 1 - p,. p,. -1 (1 - -cos a )) da J- tp (cos a - cos
f( cos a) l sin a l = Re (T(t)tP+P ) , 71 = cos a, z = cos cp, d = 1, 0 =5
a<
I 2,
7r
0 =5
(40.38)
-
g( z) - f(p2 +P.J-i ( 1 - z2 )p - 1/2 z P f( arccos z ) . 1/2) _
Using Theorem 35.2 concerning the inversion of this equation we can formulate the following statement.
Let p > 0, p < 1/2, let f(
right up to its boundary I and such that limit values of the real and imaginary parts of T( z) satisfy on l the linear relation
a(t)e(t) + b(t)71(t) = c(t), t E I,
(40.39)
where a = c = 0, b(t) = 1 on the axes z = 0 and y = 0 and a(t) = cos a(p + p ) , b(t) = - sin a(p + p) , c(t) = f(cos a) sin a, 0 � a < 1r /2, on a quarter of the circle.
808
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
(40.35)
Under the circumstances f is expressed via the given function f(cp) in by the relations ( The solution should be found in the space of functions T( z) which are bounded near z = and have an integrable singularity at the point z = i.
(35.34), 40.38). 1/2,
1
1
40.6
1/2
Remark 40.3. If p > and the analogue of Theorem then - p < obtained by using the property in ( is true. Then t 1 - JJ must be substituted instead of tl' and p must be replaced by - p in
40.20) 1
(35.4). Proof of Theorem 40.6. After inversion of (35.18) we arrive at the problem of finding the limit value T(t) of the function T(z) which is even and analytic in the right half-disk, if its boundary value in (40.38) of the form Re [T(t)tP + JJ] = f(cos a)j sin al is known. As was noted in Theorem 40.4 the function T(z) must have the property lmT(z) = 0 on the coordinate axes, i.e. when zy = 0. These three conditions may . by joined to the one given in (40.39) with the indicated coefficients. We evaluate the index x and the number of solutions of the Hilbert problem 40.1. Following the book by Gahov [1, § 30] we rewrite the relation + Re [T(t)tP JJ] = c(t) in the form
Hence we deduce the boundary condition of the corresponding Riemann problem (
1
40.40)
Here T+ (t) is the limit value on the circle lzl = of a function T(z) analytic in a < 1r and T - (t) is the limit value on lzl = of lz l < as z -+ t = e ior , a certain function T (z), lzl > 1 , which is not necessarily analytic. By a similar method the relation T+ = T- reflecting the analyticity of T on the axes is reduced. Since T(t) is even, then the homogeneous condition T+ (t) = -t - 2P - 2JJT - (t) can be continued to the whole circle except the singular point t = lying on the 2 2 cut. After a circuit around arg t P JJ has a jump which equal to - 7r (p + p) - Gahov [1], So the index x is equal to [-2p - p] + in the space of solutions integrable at the point t = and the value lxl characterizes the number of solutions of the homogeneous Hilbert problem when x � or the number of solvability conditions of the corresponding inhomogeneous problem when x < The solution of this problem itself can be constructed from the expressions given in the book by Gahov [1 , Substituting the above function T(z) into ( with � = we obtain the solution u ( z, y) of the following Dirichlet problem. The Dirichlet problem It is required to find a real-valued function everywhere except u ( z, y) even in z and y and continuous in the disk l zl perhaps the line z = This function must satisfy with � =
1
0�
§ 43.2].
/2,
-1
-1
1
-1,
0,
§ 46]. 40.2.
0
0.
1
(40.18)
�1
4
0. 40.30)
0, 0
1/2,
§ 40. INTEGRAL REPRESENTATIONS FOR THE SOLUTION
;/; 0
809
40.35) on the circle 0 and uy ( z, 0) = 0;
in the disk when zy and with initial data indicated in ( l z l = and it must be continuous and bounded on the line y = this function is bounded on the axis z = if only p <
1
0
1/2.
40.3. Boundary value problems for the generalized Helmholtz two-axially symmetric equation
40.26) - 40.28)
In this subsection on the basis of ( we construct solutions of ( the Dirichlet and Neumann problems in the half-plane for ( and of the half-homogeneous Cauchy problem in the characteristic triangle for We also indicate the character of the behavior of the solutions near singular lines, and the conditions for functions which guarantee the existence of integrals. At first we clarify the behavior of as z --+ It follows from that the representations
(40.26)
00
40.18)
(40.19).
0.
(40.25)
y'
.:.....2 (a, /3; "'{; z, y) = E ( ) 1 1 2 Ft (a, /3; "'{ + l; z) • 1 :0 "'f I -
(
40.41)
are true. Substituting an expansion of the Gauss hypergeometric function of the form into we obtain the following leading term of as z --+ oo , I arg( -z) l < 1r :
(10.13)
(40.4 1)
(40.41)
[;: �:::: :] o F1 (7 - a ; y)(-z)- " + f [P: �:::: � ] oF1 (7 - ,8; y) { -z) - 17 , a '1,8;
22 (a, ,8; 7; z, y) - r
(
40.42)
B(a, a ; "'{; z, y) - r a, "Y- a (-z) - ln( z , f3 = a. "'{
[
]
a
-
)
2.10(7) (40.42) (40.26) 1/2,
The latter relation follows from in Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi Applying to we find that if J' < then the value u(O, y) exists; if p > then the limit lim lzl 2�' - 1 u(z , y) exists; and if J' = s--o then the limit lim ln - 1 l z l u(z, y) exists. These properties show that the solution z-o given in and a has a power singularity of order O (z 1 - 2�' when p > logarithmic singularity of order O (ln lzl ) when p = on the line z = Now we use the as�ptotic expansion 0F1 (v ; -y) = O y< 1 2 ")/ 4 cos( 2 ..JY +
[1].
(40.26)
1/2,
1/2
)
[
-
1/2,
1/2 0.
810
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
1r(1 - 2v)/4)] as y -+ oo - Marichev [10, (6.21)]. Then from (40.42) we find that a f; {J,
(40.43)
z, y, -+ oo.
(40.26) 0 (40.26)
Therefore the integrand in has the following estimate as t -+ oo, namely Hence the O T t lti�' +P - 31 2 if � f; and 0[T(t)lti 2P - 2 (1 + 1tl 211 - 1 )] if � = improper integral in is convergent if the functions T(t)lti P +P - 31 2 and T t 1t 1 2P - 2 + 1tl 211 - 1 ) , are integrable at infinity. The above investigations lead to the following two statements.
] [ () ( ) (1
0.
Let T(t) be a continuous function bounded on the axis ( -oo, oo) and satisfying the following conditions at infinity: I T(t)l < Clt 1 1 1 2- p -p - E when J' > 0, � f; 0 or I T(t)l < C lt1 2- 2�' - 2P -£ when I' � 1/2, � = 0 and I T(t)l < Clti 1 - 2P - E when problem 0 < I' < 1/2, � = 0 where C is a constant and € > 0. Then the Dirichlet in the half-plane y > 0 which consists of finding the solution u E C2 (y > 0, z f; 0) of (40.18) with the initial data in (40.32) at the points z, -oo < z < oo, z f; 0, is solvable for p < 1/2, p f; 0, -1, -2, . . . and its solution is expressed by (40.26) with the coefficient
Theorem 40.7.
= [B(1/2, 1/2 - P)t 1 = f (1 - p)[y'i"f (1/2 -p)] - 1 .
(40.44) The behavior of the derivative u11 as y -+ 0 is characterized in Table 41.1 when q = 0. The behavior of u and as z 0 is also given in Table 41.1 but with q = 0 and replacing p by I' and y by z. The solution given in (40.26) has the It
Uz
-+
following behavior as y -+ oo:
Let v(t) be a continuous function on the axis ( -oo , oo) and let v(t) satisfy the following conditions at infinity: lv(t)l < CltiP - P - 1 1 2 -£ when � f; 0 and lv(t) l < Clti 2P - 1 -£ (1 + 1 tl 1 - 211) when � = 0 where C is a constant and € > 0. Then the weighted Neumann problem in the half-plane y > 0 which consists of finding the solution u E C2 (y > 0, z f; 0) of (40.18) with initial data Theorem 40.8.
(40.45)
§ 40. INTEGRAL REPRESENTATIONS FOR THE SOLUTION
811
is solvable for p > -1/2, p f; 0, 1, 2, . . . , and its solution is expressed by the relation ( 40.46)
Here u2 (x, y) has the form (40.27) with the coefficient 12 =
_
B(p, 1/2)
( 40.47)
21r
and the functions
are singular solutions of (40.18) satisfying the homogeneous condition of the form (40.45). The behavior of the solution u and its derivatives as x --. 0 and y --. 0 are characterized in Table 41.1 in the same way as was indicated in Theorem 40.7, and the solution's behavior as y --. oo is obtained from Theorem 40.7 on the basis of (40.20). Remark 40.4.
(40.46) shows that the solutions of problems with data on singular
lines can not be unique without additional restrictions on the space. In the case = 1/2 one more solution involving the function ln(p/y) in the kernel can be added to ( 40.46). For more details we refer to § 41.4.
p
Remark 40.5. Expanding the function in (40.27) with the constant ( 40.47) in the neighbourhood of the point p: u 2 = p-1 u 20 + u2 + O (p) we write the second term of this expansion
u2
x -JJ (x, y) = l i 21r
X
j (t) lt iJJ (sign xt 00
-
v
oo
l: (-.L_) 4xt
(
_
�2
_!!_
4
)
'
[
+
1) 1sign JJ I
� ��l: f: (1'(k) �:+( 1l).k.l.
l: ,l=O l:+ l 1 ln p + c - E -; i=l 1
] dt,
(40.48) where C is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. This function is the solution of the problem given in Theorem 40.8 for the singular case p = 0. If � = I' = 0 and the
812
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
condition of the form
I v(t)dt 00
=
0
(40.49)
-oo
necessary for solving the Neumann problem in the half-plane holds, then ( 40.48) leads to the known Dini relation for the solution of the Neumann problem in the half-plane y > 0 for the Laplace equation
u(z, y) = 2�
I v(t) ln[(z - t)2 00
+ y2 ]dt.
(40.50)
-oo
If p ;:::: 1/2,
then (40.27) represents also the solutions of the following weighted Dirichlet problems Remark 40.6.
1 v(z), p > 1/2, p f:. 1,2, 3, . . . , 1 - 2p lim ln - 1 y u(z, y) = v(z), p = 1/2, Y -+O
limo y2P- 1 u(z, y) =
y-+
and
-
(40.51) ( 40.52)
(40.48) is the solution of the problem in (40.52) also. In conclusion we note that on the basis (40.28) we can similarly obtain the
solution of the following half-homogeneous Cauchy problem for the hyperbolic equation (40.19)
u (z, 0) = r(z),
lim
y-O+
y2P u11 (z, y) = 0, 0 < z < 1,
(40.53)
and make the corresponding statement about its solvability.
If T E C2 ([0, 1]), 0 < p < 1/2, and 13 be given in (40.31), then the Cauchy problem in (40.53) in the triangle D = {0 < z - y < z + y < 1} has the classic solution u E C2 (D) of the fonn (40.28).
Theorem 40.9.
§ 41 . The Euler-Poisson-Darboux Equation The present section deals with integral representation for the solutions of the Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation in the elliptic and hyperbolic cases, and their applications to the construction of the solution of the Dirichlet, Neumann and Cauchy boundary value problems. As in § 40 we show by using the Erdelyi-Kober
§ 41 . THE EULER-POISSON-DARBOUX EQUATION
813
operators defined in (18.8) that solutions of the simplest equations with constant coefficients are reduced to solving the Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation.
41 . 1 . Representations for solutions of the Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation
The generalized Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation E(/3, {3* ) u = U('l - f3*ue( _- {3u11 ,
=
0, {3* , {3 -
(41.1)
const ,
is of especial importance while solving problems of axially symmetric potential theory. This equation corresponds to (40.1) with a(e, = p< • /(e - fl), b(e , = {3/(e - and c(e, = 0. After the substitutions given in (40.6) it has the form
'7)
'7)
'7)
-
'7)
>
2p = 0, 2q + -u, E+ U = Uzozo + Uyy + -Uzy y
(41.2)
f3 = p + iq, {3* = p - iq.
(41.3)
We note that the Laplace equation in Ira
(41.3') the solution of which is sought in the form
with the axis of symmetry r = 0, is reduced to (41.2) with q = 0, 2p = n 2 and y = r. Such a solution is called a 2p + 2-dimensional axially symmetric potential and satisfies the equation -
(41.3") Since the operator in (41.3") is even with respect to r, then each solution of (41.3") is an even function of r, and if p = 0 then the 2-dimensional axially symmetric potential is a harmonic function. A further two cases will be different. We shall assume f3 and /3* to be real or complex and conjugate numbers with �{3 = "&{3* = p while investigating (41.1) or ( 41 .2), respectively. By direct evaluation we prove the following statements.
814
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
A function u is the solution of the equation E({J, {J*)u = 0 if and only if the function
Lemma 41.1.
(41.4) satisfies the equation E(1 - p•, 1 - {J)v = 0. Lemma 41.2.
If u 1 (e, q) satisfies (41.1), then the function (41.5)
where a, b, c and d are arbitrary constants such that ad - be "# 0 is also a solution of (41.1). Let {3 > 0, {3* > 0, and let r(O) be an arbitrary function continuously differentiable twice. Then the integral
Lemma 41.3.
1
J1 (fJ, {J*) = J r[e + (71 - e)t]tP •- 1 (1 - t)P - 1 dt
(41.6)
0
satisfies (41.1) and it also satisfies- (41.2) in the case p > 0 provided that the conditions in (40.6) hold. We note that Lemma 41.3 follows from Theorem 40.2 if we set i (e, f1 , 0) = C(e - o) - P ('1 - 0) -P • , C -
const .
(41.7)
Then the integral of the form (40.17), i.e. ,
J2 ({3, {J*) = j i (e, 71, O)v(O)dO,
'1o
= e,
(41.8)
'lo
where v(O) is an arbitrary function continuously differentiable twice and {J < 1, {3* < 1, will satisfy (41.1) and by using Lemma 41.1 (41.8) transforms into (41.6). It is obvious that (41.6) and (41.8) are linearly independent solutions if {J "# 1/2, p• "# 1/2, p "# 1/2. Theorem 41.1.
If 0 < {J < 1, 0 < {3* < 1 and either {J "# 1/2 or {J* 'f; 1/2, then
§ 41 . THE EULER-POISSON-DARBOUX EQUATION
815
the general solution of (41.1) is given by 1
u(e, '7) = j r(8)t.B * - 1 (1 - t).B - 1 dt 0
1 * 1 + (TJ - e) .B .B j v(8)t - .B(1 - t) - .8 * dt 0
= J1 ({J, {J*) + J2 (f3, /3* ) = J (/3, /3*), 8 = e + (TJ - e)t,
(41.9)
where r(8) and v(8) are arbitrary functions continuously differentiable twice. If 0 < p < 1, p #; 1/2 then the general solution of (41.2) is given by (41.9) where r(8) and v( 8) are arbitrary continuous functions. In the case {J = {J* = p = 1/2 such a solution has the fonn 1
u(e, '7) = j r(8)( t - t 2 ) - 1 12 dt 0
1
+ j v(8)(t - t 2 ) - 1 1 2 ln [(t - t 2 )(TJ - e)]dt.
( 41.10)
0
Remark 41.1. In particular, if r(8) and v(8) are analytic functions in a certain domain 1J, i.e. for (e, TJ) E 1J, then (41.9) and (41.10) present all solutions of (41.1) analytic in 1J. We characterize briefly the process for finding the general solution of ( 41.1) for other values of the parameters f3 and {J* . Let -k < /3* < 1 - k , - 1 < {3 < 1 - l, k , l = 1, 2, 3, . . . , {J + {J* #; -1, -2, -3, . . . . Then according to the inequalities 0 < 1 - k - {J* < 1 and 0 < 1 - l - f3 < 1 the function J1 ( 1 - k - {J* , 1 - l - /3) given in (41.6) is the solution of the equation E(1 - k - {J* , 1 - 1 - {J)u = 0. We evaluate the derivative
(41.11) provided that r( 8) is sufficiently smooth. It is obvious that the integral on the right-hand side of (41.11) satisfies the equation E(1 - {J* , 1 - f3)u = 0. Therefore
816
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
multiplying (41 .11) by ( 7J - e) t - P - P* and using Lemma 41.1 we obtain the function
( 7J - e ) t - p - p ·
J T(k+l> (e)t-P (1 - t)-p· dt, t
e = e + (7J - e)t,
0
which is the solution of (41 .1). After similar transforms with the second solution J2 we arrive at the general solution of (41 .1) in the form u (e, 7J)
ak+l - (7J - e ) t - {j - {j * k J ( 1 - k - f3* , 1 - 1 - f3) , ae 871,
where J({3, {3*) is given in (41.9). Using the inequalities {3* + k the general solution
( 41.12)
> 0 and f3 + I > 0 we can obtain another form of
( 41 .13) If, for example, {3 = {3* = 1/2 - k, k = 0, 1, 2, . . . , then Jt and J2 will become linear dependent solutions and it should be substitute the right-hand side in ( 41 .10) instead of J into (41.12) and (41 .13). If one of {3 and {3* is an integer, then (41.1) can be integrated in quadratures by the cascade Laplace method - Babich, Kapilevich, Mihlin, N atanson and others [1 ,p.43]. It should be noted that we can arrive at the representation in (41.9) by using the Riemann method and the Riemann function of (41.1):
RE (e, 7]; eo , 7Jo) = ( 7J - e)P+P * ( 7J - eo) - {j ( 7]o - e) - p • 2 Ft ( /3 , {3* ; 1; u ) , = (e - eo )( 7J - 7Jo ) , ( 41 . 14) (e - 7]o} (7] - eo ) 0"
where 2 Ft is the Gauss hypergeometric function given in ( 1.73) - Babich, Kapilevich, Mihlin, Natanson and others (1 , p. 48] . It is not difficult to transfer the above results to the case of the elliptic equation (41 .2). Thus from (41 .7), (41.3), (41 .6) with Im = 0 we obtain the special solution of (41.2):
t
1 (e, 7J, t) =c t (e - t) - P (t - () - P = ct exp[-(p+iq) ln(e -t)-(p- iq) ln(t-()]
§ 41 . THE EULER-POISSON-DARBOUX EQUATION
817
=ct exp[-2p In 1e -tl- (p+iq)i arg(e -t)-(p-iq)i arg(t- ()] =ctle -t i -2P exp [-(p+iq)it/1 -(p-iq)i(r - t/1 )]
( 41 .15)
where
le - tl = J(z - t)2 + y2 , .P = arg(e - t) = arccos[(z - t )/rt ] , Yl � 0.
(41. 16)
rl =
Setting
c2
= 11 T(t) or c2 = l2v(t) in (41.15),
( 41. 17)
and integrating along the axis
-oo < t < oo and using Lemma 41.1 with respect to (41.2) (see also (40.20)), we arrive at the following two solutions of (41.2):
u(z, y) = lt y1 - 2p
00 f u(z, y) = /2 - oo
2t.P j00 [(z -T(t)e 2 t) + y2) 1 -P dt,
( 41 . 18)
- oo
v(t)e2f.P dt. [(z - t) 2 + y2]P
(41 . 19)
These representations are analogues of the solutions given in (40.26) and ( 40.27) 0 for I' .\ 0. ( 41.18) and ( 41.19) for (40.18) coinciding with ( 41.12) when are also analogues of J1 (/3, /3*) and J2 (/3, /3*). The analogy of the solution given in (41. 10) and containing the logarithmic function is the solution of (41 .2) with 1/2 of the form:
q=
p=
00 1 u(z, y) = /3 - oo
= =
T(t)e 2t.P dt, C +C y'(z t) 2 + y2 1 2 ln (z - ty) 2 + y2 _
[
]
( 41 .20)
where C1 and C2 are arbitrary constants. Carrying out the changes given in ( 40.6) and the substitution ( 1 - 2t)y and taking ( 41 .3) into account we obtain the following analogue of ( 40.30) :
= (}
( 41.21)
818
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
In particular, if q = and case of with � =
0 T(z) 0:
(40.33),
u(z, y) 2 =
13 y1 - 2P
( ) then from
= T z ,
(41.2 1) we obtain the special
y
j ReT(x + i8)(y2 - fP )P- 1 d8 0
(41.22) where I��l is the Erdelyi-Kober operator defined in and applied with respect to y. The following analogue of Theorem is valid for and
40.4
(18.8)
(41.2 1) (41.22).
Let p > 0 and let T( z ) be analytic function in the neighbourhood of z = 0. Then (41.2 1) presents all classical solutions u E C2 of (41. 2 ) in the neighbourhood of (0, 0). If in addition T(z) is an even function of y and satisfies the condition T(i) = T(z ) , then (41.22) presents all classical solutions u E C2 of (41.2) with q = 0 even with respect to y in the neighbourhood of (0, 0). Under the circumstances the value u(z, ±0) is bounded and if 0 < p < 1/2, then u11(z, 0) = 0 and u11(x, y) = O(y) as y --. 0. If in addition (40.3 1) holds, then the functions u( z, y) given in (41.21) and (41.22) satisfy (40.32). The relation inverse to (41.22) is obtained from (40.34) when � = 0, and hence lm -p - t (�Jy2 - t 2 ) = 1, provided that the conditions in Theorem 40. 5 hold.
Theorem 41.2.
In conclusion of this subsection we note that on the basis of the relations in
17.2 , note 16.2 we can deduce the connection between the asymptotics of T( ) u(z, y) as y --. +oo. Indeed, if
§ and
z
00
+ iy) """ k=O (41.23) L d�; (z)y- 21: as y --. +oo, then from (41.22) and (17.17) we obtain the following asymptotic expansion of the solution u( z, y) of the boundary value problem defined in (40.32) and (40.31) for (41.2) with q 0, namely 1} + i2yk+);2k+ u(z, Y) "'laf( > [ � ( -1) kVJtk!(rY)({g(z t y k) p k=O (41.24) r(1/2 k) + k=O L d�: ( z) r (1/2 + p - k) y21: ] as Y ___. +oo, where VJt(Y) {g(z + iy) ; 2k - 1} is the Mellin transform defined in (1.112) of the function g( z + iy) with respect to y at the point 2k + 1. ReT(z
=
P
oo
L
§ 41 . THE EULER-POISSON-DARBOUX EQUATION
819
41 .2. Classical and generalized solutions of the Cauchy problem After replacing y by iy the elliptic equation equation of the form E
(41.2) is transformed into a hyperbolic
- u = u�� - u, - -2yq u� - -2py u, = 0.
(41.25)
The last equation is characterized by the Cauchy problem considered in the characteristic triangle n- = { 0 < -y < :r: < + y} with initial conditions
1
u(z, 0) = r(z), 0 :5 :r: :5 1,
lim
y- - o
( -y) 2P u,(z, y) = v(:r:), 0 < :r: < 1.
(41.26)
The solution of this problem (with exactness to coefficients ) can be obtained from if we set and other relations for the general solution in Subsection
(41 .9)
41.1
e = x + y, TJ = :r: - y, P* = v + q, f3 = p - q
(41.27)
in the above expression. Thus the following statement is true.
If T E C2 ([0, 1]), v E C2 ((0, 1)), 0 < {3* < 1, 0 < {3 < 1 and 1, then the Cauchy problem giv2en in (41.26) for (41.25) in the domain is properly set and its solution u E C (D -) is given by
Theorem 41.3. {3 + {3* < n-
1 u(z, y) = - A 1 (-y) 1- 2P j v(:r: + y( 1 - 2t))(1 - t) -,8• t - P dt 0
1
+ B (P� fl") J r(:r + y(l - 2t) )(l - t)P - t tp •- t dt,
(41.28)
0
where A1 = [( 1 - 2p)B(1 - {3* , 1 - {3)] -1 • Corollary. If the condition
:5 1/2, (41.29) holds on the characteristic y = -:r:, then the following representation of v(:r:) via u(z, -:r:) = fb(z), 0 :5
:r:
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
820
T( z) and 1/J( z) is valid:
1 - 2 - {3) {J .!!._ p • (�) z dz 10 + 1/J 2 v(z) _- _ 2 r(1Pf-(12p) 1 - 2Pf(2p)f(1 - {3) d 2p + 2 f(1 - 2p)f({3* ) dz 10+ T(z),
( 41.30)
where IC+ is the fractional integration operator defined in (2.17). Proof. Substituting y =
'7
and
2z by z we obtain
-z into (41.28) and using (41.29) after replacing 2zt by
1/J (i) = - A t 22P - 1 f(1 - P* )I�f. p• z - P v(z) +
Applying the operator
Using now
f(2p) zt - 2p zP zP•- t T(z) . o+
r(p•)
IC�- t to this relation we find
(10.12) we evaluate the composition in the last term:
- P c 12p- t Z 1- 2p 1P z - P )Z 2p- t T(Z ) p· -t Z 1- 2p 1O+ fJ zp •- t T(Z) - 1O+ lO+ O+ O+ _ 1 - P 1P - P 12p- t t- 2p 2p- t - O+ c O+ z O+ Z ) Z T(Z) _
which yields
(41.30). •
Remark 41.2. The relation m ( 41.30) is also true provided the conditions 0 < {3 + {3* < 1, {3* > 0, {3 < 1 less restrictive than those in Theorem 41.3 hold.
(41.30) is widely used while investigating equations of mixed type - see, for example, the books by Tricomi [1], Bitsadze [1-3] and Smirnov [2, 7] . However, (41.30) is usually proved by more a complicated method which does not use (10.12).
Remark 41.3.
§ 41 . THE EULER-POISSON-DARBOUX EQUATION
821
In many cases, especially while solving boundary value problems for equations of mixed type, the conditions r, v, u E C2 from Theorem 41.3 lead to restrictions on the given functions, which are verified with difficulty. This problem is solved by considering formal solutions of the type ( 41.28) which are not sufficiently smooth and can be approximate by solutions in the space C2 • Now we consider a class R 1 of such a generalized solutions of the Cauchy problem introduced by K.l. Babenko
[1, 2].
The function in (41.28) with {3 = {3* = p is called a generalized solution of (41.25) with q = 0 in a class Rt in the domain n- = {0 < -y < X < 1 + y } if 0 < p < 1 and Definition 41.1.
( 41.31) where H >. ([O, 1)) is the space of Holderian functions defined in §
1.1.
The following statement is true.
Let generalized solution given in (41.28) with q = 0 of the Cauchy problem defined in (41.25), (41.26) be in the class Rt . Then u� , u11 E C(D-), the function u11 satisfies the second condition in (41.26) and there exists a sequence {un }� 1 , un E C2 (D- ), of classical solutions of (41.25) such that n-oo lim Un = u in any closed triangle D; = {e < -y < x < 1 + y}. Theorem 41.4.
Proof. Taking the coordinates (41.27) in (41.28) and using Lemma 13.2 according (41.31) we arrive at the representations
to
I (J
r (O) = r(O) + (0 - s) -p+e
v( O)
(J
=
v(O) + I (0 - s)P- l +e .p(s)ds,
(41.32)
0
where e > 0 is sufficiently small and
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
822
(41.33)
= + e = (8 - q)t + '1 (1.73). u (e, 71) = A l 22P - 1 B(1 - p, 1 - p)( q - e) 1 - 2P v(O) + r(O)
Using now the substitutions (} (71 - e)t inner integrals by Then we have
or (}
we evaluate the
-
- 22p - l A 1 B(1 - p,p + t:)(q - e) -P
j t/>(s)(q - s)' 2 F1 (p, 1 -p; l + e; : = ; ) ds 1 -p +t:) ('1 - e) -P + B(p,B(p,p) j �(s)(q - s)' 2 F1 (p, 1 -p; l + e; : = ;) d• ,
x
e
,
x
e
+ j �(s)(q - s)-•+• 2 F1 (p,p- e; 2p; : = : ) ds e
0
X
2 Fl
1( -p, 1 -p - 2 - 2p; ee -- '18 ) d8 . cj
(41.34)
All the above integrals are proper integrals and have continuous derivatives with respect to e and '1 in the domain V. The derivative of the last integral in ( with respect to e also exists since by (e - 8)P- l +�: 2 F1 as except the first and the last ones have 8 -+ e . Derivatives of all terms in order q - e) -P ] as '1 -+ e. Applying the operator ( q - e) 2P , to
0[(
(10.13) (41.34)
41.34) ( i=;) = 0(1) ( : - � ) (41.34)
§ 41. THE EULER-POISSON-DARBOUX EQUATION
and passing to the limit as
,.,
__...
823
e we find
x
[v(O) + j ,P(s)(e - s)"- 1 +c ds] {
0
and this passage is carried out uniformly for 0 � e � (} < 1. Hence after the substitutions given in (41.27) we obtain the second relation in (41.26). Since cp, 1/J E C([O, 1)), then by Weierstrass 's theorem there exist sequences of functions {cpn (s)}� 1 , { 1/Jn (s)}�= l E C2 ([0, 1)) tending to cp and 1/J respectively, uniformly on any interval [O, Oo], Oo < 1. By (41.32) they correspond to the functions Tn , Vn , n = 1, 2, . . . , which belong to C2 ([0, 1)) also. But then the corresponding solutions in (41.28) denoted by Un belong to C2 (D - ) and Un __... u too. •
41 .3. The half-homogeneous Cauchy problem in multidimensional half-space We consider the Cauchy problem in the half-space (x 1 , . . . , Xn ) E Rn , y > 0} for the hyperbolic equation
Rf.+ 1
=
{(x, y) x
=
(41.35) with the half-homogeneous initial conditions
u(x, 0) = T(x), uy (x, 0) = 0,
(41.36)
where T(x) E C2 (Rn ) is the given function. It is known, (Courant and Hilbert [1, p. 466]) that if 2p = n - 1, then the solution of the problem given in (41.35) and (41.36) is unique, and it can be represented as the spherical mean Mn (x, y; T) of the function T in the space Rn by
u(z, y) = Mn (z, y; T) = I S l l J T(:t + yt)dcr. n - t s..
(41.37)
-1
Here t = (t t , . . . , t n ) lies on the surface of the unit sphere Bn - 1 i.e. I t I = 1, du is an element of the unit sphere surface area and I Sn - 1 1 = 21rn/2 /f(n/2) is its surface
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
824
area. Its value is evaluated by
(25.9) when f = 1.
·
In particular, the relations
( 41.38) ( 41.39) follow from ( 41.37). We apply the Erdelyi-Kober operator I, , o o defined in (18.8) and denoted by I��l below, with respect to y to the solution in (41.37). Then using Lemma 40.2 with A = 0 we select the parameters of I��l so that the operator in ( 41.35) with 2p = n - 1 will be transformed into the operator in ( 41.35) with arbitrary 2p. In this way we construct the function
+ 1/2) I
(41.40)
According to Lemma 40.2 this function is the solution of (41.35) and the constant coefficient r�1!H)) is chosen so that the conditions in ( 41.36) hold in view of
(41.38).
We note that if we use the definition of the Erdelyi-Kober operator I, ,a for considered in subsection 18.1, then (41.40) remains the solution of the Cauchy problem given in (41.35) and (41.36) in the case p < (n - 1)/2. However, Bresters (2) proved that the solution given in (41.40) is not a unique in the case a
<0
p < o.
By using (23.1)
(41.40) can be represented in the form
+ 1/2) u(z, y) = r(pr(n/2)
I
"Y+ioo
")' - ioo
r((n - s)/2) rot(y ) {M (z, y r) s} y ds, n ; ; r((1 - s)/2 + p) -·
0 < 1 < 1,
( 41.41)
where rot
r(t)
�
L akt - k , t -+ oo. k:O
( 41.42)
§ 41 . THE EULER-POISSON-DARBOUX EQUATION
825
Then, as was done by Berger and Handelsman [1], 00
M1 (z, y; r)
�
L ck(z)y- 21: ,
(41.43)
k =O
where co (z) = ao ,
k = 1 , 2, . . . is a polynomial of degree 2k - 1. Hence by using ( 17.18) we obtain the asymptotic expansion of the solution of (41.25) with q = 0:
u ( z, y)
�
f(p + 1/2) Vi +
2(- 1)1: rot(r > {M1 (z, y; r); 2k + 1} [� f:'o k!f(p - k)y2 + 1 1:
l
�
f(1/2 - k) 2 f:'o f(p + 1/2 - k) c�;(z)y- 1:
·
(41.44)
In conclusion of this subsection we note that Lemma 40.2 in the case of arbitrary �, enables us to construct the solutions of the Cauchy problem for arbitrary homogeneous linear hyperbolic equations of second order with constant coefficients, on the basis of the solution given in (41 .37). Indeed, the above equations by changes of variables can be reduced to the equation n
L v�. � . - v, - �2 v = 0. 1:= 1
(41 .45)
According to Lemma 40.2 the solution v(z, y) of this equation can be transformed to the solution u(z, y) of (41.35) with 2p = n - 1 by the relation
u(z, y) =
(
)
r(n/2) (y) 1 n- 1 2 - v(z, y) , v'i Ji >.. - 2 , -
(41.46)
where Jf' > (f1, a) is the generalized Erdelyi-Kober operator J>.. ( f1, a ) defined in (37.45) and applied with respect to y. Then (41.36) is true for the solution v(z, y)
826
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
also, and the inverse transform is given by the expression
(
)
1 - n M (x, y,. T). ,fi (y ) n u(x, y) -_ f(n/2) J). 2 - 1, 2- n If on the basis of the solution
( 41.47)
v(x, y) we construct the function y
v(x, y) = J v(x, t)dt,
( 41.48)
0
then it is also the solution of conditions
(41.45)
satisfying the half-homogeneous initial
( 41.49) v (x, 0) = 0, Vy {z, 0) = T(x) symmetric with (41.36). Replacing T(x) by v(x) in (41.48) and adding it with the function given in (41.47) we arrive at the solution of the Cauchy problem of the general form ( 41.26) with p = 0 for (41.45). 41 .4. The weighted Dirichlet and Neumann problems in a half-plane In this subsection we apply the results given in ( 41.18)-(41.20) to solving the Dirichlet and Neumann problems in the half-plane y > 0 for (41.2) with any parameters p and q . The following analogues of Theorem 40.7 and 40.8 are true.
Let T be a continuous function bounded on the real line ( -oo, oo) . Then the Dirichlet problem in the half-plane y > 0 which consists of finding the solution u(x, y) E C2 (y > 0) of (41.2) in the space of functions bounded at infinity under initial conditions in ( 40.32) is properly set for any real q only in the case p < 1/2. The solution is given by (41.18) with Theorem 41.5.
_
I1 Theorem 41.6. Let 11 be a line ( - oo , oo) and if p � 0,
(1 - 2p)B(1 - ,8, 1 - ,8) 22Pref""
·
(41.50)
continuous function absolutely integrable on the real then in addition lv(t)l < C jt j 2p - l -e , c > 0, It I oo , C - const. Let also the necessary condition in (40.49) be satisfied. Then the weighted Neumann problem in the half-plane y > 0 which consists of finding the solution u E C2 (y > 0) of (41.2) vanishing at infinity and satisfying the boundary condition in (40.45) on the axis - oo < x < oo is properly set only in three cases: --+
§ 41. THE EULER-POISSON-DARBOUX EQUATION
827
1) p > q, q is an arbitrary real number; 2) -1/2 < p < 0, q = 0 and 3) p = q = 0. In the first two cases the solution of the above problem is given by (41.19) with ( 41.51) and in the third case the solution is given by (40.50) and is continuously connected with (41.19) and (41.51) only for q = 0, p -+ 0. These solutions contain integrals which converge absolutely and uniformly in the set { y � 0, lzl < R} and these solution vanish at infinity of order u = O(p- 2P - l) and u� , u11 = O(p- 2P - 2 ) as p = ..jz 2 + y2 -+ oo . ) Let p = 1/2 and r be a function continuous on the real line and lr(t)l < Cltl - e , e > 0, lt l -+ oo, C - const. Then the weighted Dirichlet and Neumann problems in the half-plane y > 0 which consists of finding the solution u ( z , y) E C2 (y > 0) of (41.2) vanishing at the infinity and satisfying the conditions
Theorem 41. 7.
lim ln - 1 yu(z, y) = lim yu11 (z, y) = r( z ) ,
11 - + o
11 - + o
-oo
< z < oo,
(41.52)
respectively, are solvable and their solutions are given by (41.20) where 1/J has the form (41.17) and
or by the equivalent relation (41.54) where C, C1 and C2 are arbitrary constants and 1/J (z) is defined in (1.67). (41.18) with respect to y, and taking the limit as y -+ +0 in the equation obtained and in (41.19), provided that p < 1/2 and ( 40.32) and ( 40.45) hold, and further, making the changes of variables Remark 41.4. Differentiating
Ct = ch qr,
c2 = -sh qr,
a=
1 - 2p,
we obtain the relations in (12.11) and (30.78) which reflect connection between the direct and inverse Feller transforms.
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
828
and
The following boundary value problems are solvable for other parameters p q.
A. If p > 1/2 and q is any real number, then the weighted Dirichlet problem (40.51), -oo < x < oo , is solvable and its solution is given by (41.19), (41.51). B. If p = 0, q =F 0, then the weighted Neumann problem lim ln - 1 yu11 (x, y) = v(x)
(41.55)
Y -+O
is solvable and its solution is given by ( 41.19) with p = 0, C. If p < 0, q =f: 0, then the Neumann problem
u11 (x, 0) = v(x) ,
-oo <
/2 = [4qe 9'��' sh q ] - 1 . 1r
x < oo,
(41.56)
is solvable in the space of functions bounded at infinity and its solution is given by (41.18) with
r(t) = -pq - 1
J v(8)d8 t
+ C,
C-
const ,
- oo
where C = 0 if u vanishes at infinity. D. If q = 0, p = -1/2, then the weighted Neumann problem lim o(yln y) - 1 u11 (x, y) = v(x) , 11-+
-oo <
x < oo,
(41.57)
is solvable and its solution is given by ( 41.19) with q = 0, 12 = -1/2. E. If q = O , p < -1/2, then the weighted Neumann problem
(41.58) under the conditions ( 40.49) and lv(t)l < Clt l - 2 - e:, c > 0, I t I --+ oo, is uniquely solvable in the space of functions vanishing at infinity together with their derivatives of the first order and its solution is given by (41.18) with q = 0 and
J (t - 8)v(8)d8, t
r(t) =
- oo
It =
2f(1 - p) . y'ir( -1/2 - p)
In order for the above problems to become uniquely solvable we must assume additional conditions on the solutions, and remove the singular solutions of (41.2) of p the form y 1 - 2P r12P - 2 e 29tP , y 1 - 2P ! rl- 2 e 29 tP , 1 and In y! r}- 1 ln(yr1- 2 )e 29tP if p - 1/2 .
§ 42. ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF FRACTIONAL ORDER
829
Table 41.1
p q
u=O
Uy = 0
< -l 0 1
y
-l 0 1
-l < p < O
y ln y
0 1
y - 2p
0 0 1 1
#:- 0 1 1
v
1
,- 2p
l
v
>l v
ln y yl - 2p 1 y- 2p ,-
Table 41.1 reflects the dependence of the orders of the solution u of (41.2) and its derivative uy as y --+ 0 on the parameters p and q. This table also show which weights correspond to properly setting Neumann and Dirichlet problems with conditions on the singular line y = 0.
§ 42. Ordinary D ifferential Equations of Fractional Order Equations in which an unknown function y( x) is contained under the sign of a derivative of fractional order, i.e. equations of the form
F(x, y(x), v:: w 1 (x)y(x), v::w2 (x)y(x), . . . , v:: wn (x)y(x)) = g(x),
(42.1)
where v:J = v::+ or v::_ are called ordinary differential equations of By analogy with the classical theory of differential equations, differential equations of fractional order are divided into linear, homogeneous and inhomogeneous equations with constant and variable coefficients. Differential equations of fractional order are studied both in the space of regular functions, i.e. functions summable to a certain power and continuous and differentiable up to certain order in a classical sense, and in various spaces of generalized functions. Analogues of the Cauchy and Dirichlet problems for differential equations of fractional order often arise in applications. Thus if we would like to find the solution y(x) of (42.1) with initial conditions
fractional order.
then we say that we are dealing with the solution of the Cauchy-type problem for If the values of the unknown function or of its derivatives of integer or fractional order are given at the end points of a certain interval (z0, z 1 ] then we say that we are dealing with the Dirichlet-type problem for (42.1). In this section we shall be concerned with the proper setting of certain problems for differential equations of fractional order. Thus we shall study questions concerning the solvability of these equations in certain spaces of functions.
(42.1).
830
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
Further, the applications of the theory of fractional integra-differentiation and the theory of differential equations of fractional order to integration of certain classes of differential equations of integer order will be considered.
42. 1 . The Cauchy-type problem for differential equations and systems of differential equations of fractional order of general form We need to find a function
y(z) satisfying the equation
da y(z} = /(z, y), dza n
n-
1 < a 5 n, n = 1,2, . . .
,
(42.2}
0/
= -[-a], where here and below tz 01 = vg+ , with initial conditions k = 1, 2, . . . , n ,
(42.3 }
where / (z, y) is the given function and a, b t , . . . , bn are given constants. We shall consider a series of theorems on the existence and uniqueness of the solution of the above problem. We denote by Rn the following set of points (z, y) in a domain D lying in R x R:
(42.4} where a, h and b 0 are certain constants.
Let f(x, y) be a real-valued function continuous zn Lipschitzian with respect to y:
Theorem 42.1.
1/(z, Yt ) - f(x, Y2 ) 1 5 A IYt - Y2 l
D
and
(42.4'}
and let the condition sup(z ,y )ED 1/(z, y)l = bo < oo hold. Then there exists a unique continuous solution of the Cauchy-type problem given in (42.2}, (42.3} for n = 1 in the domain Rt C D. For the case n = 1 we refer to (42.4}.
§ 42. ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF FRACTIONAL ORDER
831
Let f(x, y) satisfy the conditions in Theorem 42.1. Then there exists a unique continuous solution of the Cauchy-type problem given in (42.2), (42.3) for n = 1, 2, . . . in the domain Rn C D.
Theorem 42.2.
Let !A:(x, y� , . . , Ym), k = 1, 2, . . , m, be real-valued functions continuous in a domain Dm C R X R!" and satisfying the conditions
Theorem 42.3.
.
.
m 1 /k (x, Yl , . . . , Ym) - b: (x, Z t , . . . , Zm)l � A E IYi - Zi l , k = 1, 2, . . . , m, i= l
and
sup
(z-,yl , · · · ·!f,. ) ED.,.
k= 1 , 2 ... m
1/k (z, Yb . . . , Ym)l = M <
oo.
Then there exists a unzque
, , continuous solution of the Cauchy-type problem
k = 1, 2, . . . , m, 0 < a � 1,
in the domain
where a > Mh/f(a + 1).
1 x1 - aYk (x) - f(n)bk I � a,
}
k = l, 2, . . . , m ,
Let f(x , Yl , . . . , Ym ) satisfy the conditions in theorem 42.3. Then there exists a unique continuous solution of the Cauchy-type problem
Theorem 42.4.
da
dx a Yk (x) = l�c (x, yt , . . . , ym ),
-
k = 1, 2, . . , m, .
in the domain
j = 1, 2,
. . . , n,
n-
1 < a � n,
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
832
fl..
==
{ (z,
!ft . . .
where
. , !lm )
E Dm
:
0<
Z
:5 h,
,.,n-a!li (z) - r(a �: + l ) l :5 a, J: =
}
1 , 2, . . . , m .
.
n - 1 hn -j h . a>E . f(a . .:_ 1 ) , bi ,o = M, k = 1 , 2, . . , m. J =O
_
J
Let Pi (z), k = 0, 1 , . . . , m, and /(z) be functions continuous on an interval (O, h). Then the Cauchy-type problem
Theorem 42.5.
k = 1, 2, . . . , m, has a unique solution continuous on (O, h) . Theorem 42.6.
Under the conditions in Theorem 42.5 the Cauchy-type problem m
cJ(m - i )a
l: Pt(z) dz(m - i)a Yi (z) = /(z), k=O
n - 1 < a � n,
.
k = 1 , 2, . . , m, j = 1, 2, . . . , n ,
has a unique solution continuous on (0, h).
The proof of Theorems 42.1-42.6 differs little from the proofs of the corresponding
theorems for differential equations of integer order. Therefore we prove Theorem 42.1 . Integrating (42.2 ) where fz-_0101 = I�+ we have
833
§ 42. ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF FRACTIONAL ORDER
and hence according to the property in (2.61) and the condition in (42.3) we obtain
a- 1 + f (x - t) a- 1 /(t, y)dt. y(x) = b1 xf(a) f(a) :r:
(42.5)
0
So, the problem in (42.2) and (42.3) is reduced to (42.5). We show now that if the continuous function satisfies (42.5), then it satisfies ( 42.2) and ( 42.3). Indeed, applying the operator d�OJ to (42.5) we have
/(x, y)
dOl d:r: OJ
y(x) - f(x, y). The condition in (42.3) for n = k = 1 can be obtained without difficulty if we
and, hence,
apply the operator a�01-_\ to
(42.5):
:r:
=b1 + rt1) j f(t, y(t))dt, 0
and then set
x = 0.
It follows from our arguments that ( 42.5) is equivalent in the above sense to (42.2) with initial conditions given in (42.3). We accomplish the rest of the proof by the method of successive approximations, although the method of compressed mappings - Kolmogorov and Fomin [1, p. 73) - may be also used. Let
a- 1 + f (x - t)a- 1 f(t , Y (t))dt , n = 1, 2, . Yn (x) = b1 xf(a) n- 1 f(a) :r:
0
First of all we require the points
.
..
(42.6)
(x , Yn (x)) to be lie in R1 for 0 < x � h.
The
834
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
estimate
I.,'-"Yn(Z) - �� 1 ;��; 10 (z - t)"- ',(t, 7/n- t (t))dt :r:
r
)
=
< bo x -< boh r(o: + 1) r (o: + 1)
(42.7)
follows from the condition sup I /( z, y) I = b0 • If the condition b0 h /f( o: + 1) < a (:r: ,y )eD
holds, then (z, Yn (z)) E R1 for 0 < z � h. Now we estimate the difference Yn (z) - Yn - l (z). By
(42.7) we have
IY1 (z) - Yo(z)l � bo z a /f(o: + 1) � bo h a /f(o: + 1). By using the Lipschitz condition given in with n = 1 we find that
l!12 (z) - y, (z)l
l = r at ( )
(42.4') and the last estimate from (42.6)
:r:
j< z - t)"- 1 [/(t, y, (t)) - f(t, I/O (t))dt 0
$ r�) 1 (z - t)" - ' lut (t) - 7/o (t)ldt :r:
0
2 1( a- 1 bo ta dt � rAbo h a � rA z t ) ( o: ) r (o: + 1) (2o: + 1} " 0 :r:
Repeating such
an
estimate many times we finally arrive at the inequality
It follows from here that the sequence Yn ( z) tends to a certain limiting function y(z) uniformly with respect to z (0 < z � h). This limiting function is continuous in (0 < z � h) and satisfies the inequality
which is obtained if we pass to the limit in
(42.7) as n -+ oo.
Now carrying out
§ 42. ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF FRACTIONAL ORDER
835
the passage to the limit in (42.6) as n --+ oo we obtain ( 42.5) according to the continuity of /(z, y). We prove that the solution y( z) is unique for sufficiently small h . Let A h a /f (a + 1 ) < 1 and we suppose that there exist two solutions y(z) and Y(z) of the problem considered. Substituting them into (42.5) and subtracting one from the other we obtain
ly(z) - Y (z)l =
z
J 0
(z t) a- 1 �(a) [/(t, y(t)) - /(t, Y(t))]dt
� J (z - t)a- 1 i y(t) - Y(t) idt . z
�r )
0
We suppose that the difference I Y( z) - Y ( z) I admits a maximal value 6 at a certain point z = e lying on the interval 0 < z � h. Then for z = e from the last inequality we have that 6 � A r- 1 (a)6h a a - 1 or 1 � A h a / f (a + 1) which contradicts the assumption. This completes the proof of Theorem 42.1. Theorem 42.2 is proved similarly to Theorem 42.1, only in this case we set
Theorems 42.3 and 42.4 are extensions of Theorems 42.1 and 42.2 to the case of systems of differential equations of fractional order. Theorems 42.5 and 42.6 are special cases of Theorems 42. 1 and 42.2. • In conclusion of this subsection we consider two examples in which Theorems 42.1 and 42.2 are used. Example 42.1. We solve the following Cauchy-type problem
n - 1 < a � n,
k = 1 , 2, . . . , n. Using the proof of Theorem 42.1 we have
836
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
n za- k Yo (z) = L blc r (a - k + 1) ' lc= 1
� J(z - t)"- 1 Ym- t (t)dt.
Ym (z) = Yo (z) + f )
z:
0
Hence for m = 1 , 2, . . . we find
Y1 (z) = Yo( z) + .\
n
2 lc
[; b�c f(2az -a-k + 1) , ...,
which in the general case yields n m+ 1 . 1 z. aj - lc , m = 1 , 2, . . '""' = b (z) Ym L..J _\JL..J k '""' f (aJ - k + 1) k= 1 i = 1
.
After we pass to a limit as m -+ oo we obtain the following representation for the solution: oo n . 1 zaj - k y(z) = '""' L..J _\JL..J b�c '""' . 1) r(aJ - k + lc= 1 i = 1 .
00 = L bk za- lc Ea, 1 + a- 1c(.\z a ) ,
lc= 1
where Ea, p (z) is the Mittag-Leffler function defined in (1.91). In particular, if a = n = 1, then 00 zj - 1 Y(z) = b1 '""' .) = b 1 e�z: � _\i - 1 _r_ ( J = J 1
and we have "a joining" of the known solution of the Cauchy problem for the equation of first order and of the above problem for the equation of order a. Example 42.2. Now we construct the solution of the Cauchy-type problem for
§ 42. ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF FRACTIONAL ORDER
837
the inhomogeneous differential equation
da dz a y(x) - �y(x) = h(x),
n-
1 < a :5 n ,
with initial conditions
k = 1, 2, . . . , n . Similar to the previous example we have
Ym (x) =Yo (z) +. r a )
+ r (1a)
t
I(x - t)a- 1 Ym- 1 (t)dt :r:
0
I (x - t)a- 1 h(t)dt, :r:
0
and hence
n m+1 . X aj - J: """ (x) Ym = L., b��: """ L., �J- 1 f (aJ. - k + 1) J:= 1 j= 1
I
m �J- 1 + r(aj ) (z - t) aj - 1 h(t)dt. J-1 0 Passing to a limit
as m -+ oo
�
•
:r:
we find the solution of the Cauchy-type problem
n
y(x) = L b��: xa- J: Ea , 1 +a- J: (�xa ) J:= 1
I :r:
+ (x - t)a- 1 Ea, a [�(x - t) a]h(t)dt. 0
42.2. The Cauchy-type problem for linear differential equation of fractional order We consider the linear differential equation of fractional order
n- 1
�"· y(x) + L P��: (z)�"·-•- 1 y(z) + Pn (x)y(x) = /(z), J:= O
(42.8)
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
838
where
l'l'\O'o -- vOcr+o - 1 ' k = 1, 2, . 1: u1: = LO ai - 1, k = 0, 1, . . . 0 < ai � 1, j = 0, 1, . . , n,
AJ
...,n
, n,
j=
k = 1, 2, .
a1: = u1: -
ao = uo 1 -
()
(42.9) ()
- obviously, UA: - 1 , , n, and PA: x and f x are + given functions. We require to find the solution y( x) of this equation satisfying the initial conditions
D O",. y(x ) jx = O
.
.
= 61:, k = 0, 1,
...,n-
1.
(42.10)
We begin the investigation of this Cauchy-type problem for the case
Pk ( x) =
0, k 0, 1, . =
. .
, n,
i.e. we consider the equation
(42.10).
(42.11)
with initial conditions given in The following statement is true. Theorem 42.7.
Let a function f(x) E L 1 (0,a) be represented in the form
(42.12) where j( x ) E L 1 (0, a). Then there exists a unique solution of the Cauchy-type problem defined in (42.11), (42.10) represented in the form
Proof. It is obviously follows from (42.9) that
(42.13)
§ 42. ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF FRACTIONAL ORDER
839
Hence, (42.11) may be rewritten as
or (42.14) Thus the problem defined in (42.1 1) and (42.10) is reduced to the problem given in (42.14) with initial conditions in (42.10) where k = 0, 1, . . . , n - 2. Applying again (42. 13) to (42.14) similar to the above arguments we obtain (42 .15) Now the problem defined in (42.11) and (42.10) is reduced to the problem given in (42. 15) with initial conditions (42.10) where k = 0, 1 , . . . , n - 3. Continuing this process we reduce (42.1 1) to the equivalent equation
which has the form (42.16) if we take into account the relation
We prove that the above function y( z) satisfies the initial conditions in (42.10). For this we apply the operator 1)C7o given by
to (42. 16). Setting here z = 0 we obtain the condition in (42.10) for k = 0. Applying the operator 1)C7 1 to ( 42. 16) and setting then z = 0 we arrive at the condition in (42.10) for k = 1 . Continuing this process we verify that all conditions
840
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
in (42.10) are satisfied. The uniqueness of the solution of the above Cauchy-type problem follows from (42.16) too. • Now we formulate the main theorem of this subsection.
Let the functions Pi (z), k = 0, 1, . . . , n, be Lipschitzian, i.e. they satisfy the Holder condition of order � = 1 - Subsection 1 . 1 on an interval [0, a), and let /(z) be continuous function in [0, a) which can be represented in the form
Theorem 42.8.
-
(42. 17)
where i(z) E L 1 (0, a). If ao > 1 - an , then the Cauchy-type problem defined in and (42.10) has an unique solution continuous on [O, a].
(42.8)
We set l)C7• y(z) = �(z). Then (42.8) h as the form of the Volterra integral equation of the second order
Proof.
�(z) = w(z) +
z:
j W(z, t)�(t)dt,
( 42.18)
0
where
W(z, t) = - Pn (z) (z -f t)u. (un )
-1 (42.19)
( 42.20) (42.19) shows that the kernel W(z, t) has a weak singularity at t = z. Applying the method of successive approximation to (42.18) we find that this equation admits not more than one solution �(z) E L 1 (0, a) continuous on [0, a]. Hence, by Theorem 42.7 we deduce the uniqueness of the solution of the problem defined in ( 42.8) and (42.10). The proof of the existence of the solution of this problem
841
§ 42. ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF FRACTIONAL ORDER
according to Theorem 42.7 is also reduced to the proof of the representation
da ,. - 1 <J (x) = dx a ,. - 1 <J (x), i (x) L 1 (0, a) . _
E
(42.21)
Indeed, since (42.18) admits not more than one solution <J (x) = l) CT • y(x), then by Theorem 42.7 it is sufficient to prove that the function
is the solution of the problem given in (42.8) and (42.10). Thus we must to verify the condition given in (42.21) and in Theorem 42.7. We shall now do this verification. Taking into account the conditions a 0 > 1 - c:tn , c:tn > 0 and the inequalities
in accordance with
(2.44) we write the relations
da ,. - 1 z CTk +at ,. - 1 k = 0, 1, . . . , n - 1, r(1 + u�:) dx 01 · - 1 r (u�: + c:tn ) ' da .. - 1 z CT,. - CTk + a.. - 1 X CT,. - CTk = r(l + O'm - O'A: ) dx01 · - 1 r (um - O'A: + c:tn ) ' m = k, k + 1, . . . , n - 1, zCTk
which together with
(42.17) allow us to write (42.20) in the form
w(x)
(42.22) Now we apply the result by Dzherbashyan and Nersesyan [6, p. 17], who proved that for any functions g(x) L 1 (0, a) and p�:(x) C([O, a]) there exists a unique function G(x) L 1 (0, a) satisfying the relation
E
E
E
(42.23)
842
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
Similar statements may be found in Lemmas 3.2 and 10.1. On the basis of the above result, ( 42.22) can be rewritten as
a,. - 1 w(z) = ddza,. - 1 w(z), where w(z) is a certain function in have
L 1 (0, a).
(42.24)
Further from (42.18) and (42. 19) we
and hence according to (42.23) we obtain
d- · v(z), v(z) E £ (0, a), �(z) = w(z) + dz1 •
(42.25)
where Hence it follows from {42.24) and (42.25) that
-1 d- • v(z). + �(z) = dcr· w(z) 1 -• dzzOtra If now x � 1 -an , then the representation in (42.21) has been proved. If x < 1 - an , then according to (42.23) there exists p E N such that (p - 1)x < 1 - ern < px and
da,. - 1 w(z) + d-P• v (z), v(z) E L (0, a). �(z) = dz 1 a ,. - t dz -P •
This completes the proof. • In conclusion of this subsection we indicate that the simplest Cauchy problems for differential equations of fractional order (42.8') and (42.8") VC:.. y - >..y = 0, z > 0, y(O) = 1, 0 < a < 1, have the solutions y = z01 - 1 Ea,a (>.. z 01) and y = exp ( ->.. 1 101z), respectively. Here the fractional derivatives Vg+ and V� are defined in (5.9) and the Mittag-Leffler function Ea,p (z) in {1.91).
§ 42. ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF FRACTIONAL ORDER
843
42.3. The Dirichlet-type problem for differential equation of fractional order We consider the differential equation of second order with fractional derivatives in the form
Ly :y" (x) + a o (x)y'(x) m + E a�:(x)Vg.f. (w�: (x)y(x)) + a m+ 1 (x)y(x) = f(x) 1:= 1
( 42.26)
on the internal [0, 1], where 0 < a 1: < 1 and functions a0 (x), a m+ 1 (x), a�:(x), w�:(x), k = 1, 2 , . . . , m, f(x) are continuous on [0, 1]. In the theory of boundary value problems for the equations of the form ( 42.26) the following two theorems are of importance. The first of them is an analogue of the Hopf principle - Bitsadze [3, p. 25, 26].
Let w�: (x), k = 1 , 2, . . . , m , be non-decreasing positive functions on [0, 1] satisfying the Holder condition with exponents KJ: > a�:, 0 < a�: < 1, k = 1 , 2 , . . . , m, and a�:(x) E C[0, 1], a 1: � 0, 0 < x < 1, k = 1, 2 , . . . , m + 1. If y E C2 (0, 1) is the solution of (42.26) which differs from a constant, then the positive maximum and negative minimum of y(x) can be only at the end points x = 0 or x = 1.
Theorem 42.9.
Proof. We suppose the opposite, i.e. there exists x0 , 0 < x0 < 1, such that max y(x) = y(xo ) > 0. We note that if cp(t) is continuous on [0, x] and satisfies o<�< 1 the -Holder condition of order x > a at the point t = x and has a maximum at this point then (13.1) yields (Dg+ cp)(x) > 0. Therefore, since functions w�:(x) are positive and non-decreasing on [0, 1], then WJ: fl has a positive maximum at the point x0 • Hence there exists 6 > 0 such that the inequalities
0 < y(x) < y(xo ), a�:(x)(Dg.f.w�:y)(x) � 0, k = 1 , 2, . . . , m, hold for any x E [x0 - 6, x0] . From the equation Ly = 0 we have
y" + ao (x)y' =
m
-
E a�:(x)Dg.f.w�: (x)y - am+ 1 (x)y. 1: = 1
Hence
y" + ao (x)y' 2:: 0, x E [xo - 6, x o] .
(42.27)
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
844
On the interval
[zo - 6, zo] we introduce the preliminary function z(z) = y(z) + cg(z),
where g(z) = exp ( -pz) - exp ( -pzo), p > 0, 0 < c < [y(zo) - y(zo - 6))/g(zo - 6). Substituting y(z) = z(z) - cg(z) into (42.27) we have
z" + ao(z)z' � cp exp ( -pz) [p - ao(z)). If we choose p such that p > a0 (z) for z E
[z0 - 6, z0), then we obtain
z" + ao(z)z' > 0.
(42.28)
z(z) has a maximum on the open interval (z o - 6, zo), then the conditions and z" $ 0 hold at the corresponding point. This contradicts (42.28). Therefore z( z) can have maximum only at the point zo since
If only
z'
=
0
o - 6) z(z0 - 6)
z(zo ), z'(zo) � 0.
But 0 $ z'(zo) = y'(zo) + cg'(zo) = y'(zo) - cpexp (-pzo) and hence y'(zo) � cp exp( -pz0) > 0 which contradicts the necessary condition of the extremum y'(z 0) = 0. Thus the extremum of y(z) can not be at the inner point of the interval [0, 1) . • The second theorem is an analogue of the Zaremba-Giraud principle - Bitsadze
[3, p. 26).
Let the conditions in Theorem 42.9 be satisfied. If y E C[O, 1] u C1 (0, 1) u C2 (0, 1) is the solution of the equation Ly = 0 given in (42.26) and
Theorem 42.10.
max y(x) = y(1) > 0 y• = O�z� l
(y. = O�z min y(x) = y(l) < 0), �l then y'(1) > 0 (y'(1) < 0). If y• = y(O) > 0 (y. = y(O) < 0), then y'(O) < 0 (y'(O) > 0) provided that the additional conditions hold, namely y(z) E C1 [0, 1), Wk (z) E C1 [0, co], Wk (O) =I= 0, k = 1, 2, . . . ' m, where co is a small positive number.
§ 42. ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF FRACTIONAL ORDER
845
The proof follows directly from Theorem 42.9. Definition 42.1.
boundary condition
We say the problem of finding the solution of (42.26) with the y(O) = y(1) = 0
( 42.29)
is the Dirichlet-type problem for this equation. Let the coefficients of (42.26) satisfy the conditions in Theorem and ao (z) = 0, at (z), Wt (z) E C1 [0 , 1), k = 1 , 2, . . . , m. Then the Dirichlet type problem defined in (42.26) and (42.29) is solvable unconditionally and uniquely in the space of functions C[O, 1] n C2 (0 , 1).
Theorem 42. 11.
42.9
Proof. It is not difficult to verify the following equalities
tp(z) = ztp(z) - (z - 1)tp(z)
1
= :X[! ttp(t)dt + f (t - 1)tp(t)dt] z
0
z
� [/0 ttp(t)dt + z(z - 1)tp(z) + J (t - 1)tp(t)dt - z(z - 1)tp(z)] 1
z
=d
z
�
1
= dz'l [/ (z - t)ttp(t)dt + J z(t - 1)tp(t)dt] 0 z 1 ' = dz2 J G(z, t)tp(t)dt, z
0
where
G(z, t) =
{ t(zz(t -- 1),1),
t � z,
t > z.
Therefore in the c ase a 0 (z) = 0 we can rewrite (42.26) �
dz'l
�(z) = 0,
(42.30)
as
(42.31 )
846
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
where
t
�{ z) =y(z) +
J0 G(z, t)am+ t (t)y(t)dt
m t
t
+ L: J G(z, t )a�; (t)(Vg+ w�: y)(t)dt - j G(z, t) f(t )dt. l: = t o
o
{42.32)
From the immediate verification of this by using (42.29) we can prove that �{0) = �{1) = 0. Hence, from {42.31) we derive the relation
�{ z) = 0.
{42.33)
Hence we have proved that the Dirichlet-type problem given in (42.26) and (42.29) is equivalent to the integral equation (42.32) and ( 42.33). The immediate verification shows that this equation is a Fredholm equation of the second kind. In view of Theorems 42.9 and 42.10 and the boundary conditions in {42.29) the homogeneous integral equation {42.32) and {42.33) with /{ z) = 0 is equivalent to the Dirichlet-type homogeneous problem, and therefore it has only the trivial solution y = 0. From here we deduce that the Fredholm inhomogeneous equation is solvable unconditionally ·and uniquely, and hence the Dirichlet-type problem is also solvable unconditionally and uniquely. •
42.4. Solution of the linear differential equation of fractional order with constant coefficients in the space of generalized functions We consider the linear differential equation of fractional order n
L a; ]0i y(z) = /{ z),
j=t
{42.34)
where here and below Ja; = 1;+ = V�; , and with constant complex non-vanishing coefficients a t , a2 , . . . , a n and different real exponents at , a 2 , . . . , an . This equation generalizes the Abel integral equations of the first and second kind, and the usual linear differential equations of integer order with constant coefficients. We shall find the solution y( z ) of ( 42.34) in the space Sf. of tempered distributions with support in [0, oo ). One may obtain more detailed information about this and other terms and notation of this subsection in the book by Vladimirov [2] .
§ 42. ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF FRACTIONAL ORDER
Let /(z) E S.f. . We write (42.34)
as
847
the convolution
k(z) * y(z) + /(z)
(42.35)
where n
k(z) = L: a; /a; (z), j =l and a generalized function Ia ( z) E s� is /a (z) =
(42.36)
{f
z+- l /f(a), a > 0, (N) a+ N (z), a :5 0, a + N > 0, N = [ a] + 1 . -
-
( 42.37)
We apply the Fourier-Laplace integral transform to both sides of ( 42.35). For /( z) E S� this transform is defined by
F(z) = L[/(z)](z) = L[/](z + iy) = V[f(e)e- (Y ,O](z),
( 42.38)
where V [g (e)](z) is the Fourier transform of a generalized function g(e) E defined in the usual way - Vladimirov [2 , p. 105]. We introduce the notation n
· if(a; / 2
aJ e Y(z) = L[y(z)](z), K(z) = L[k(z)](z) = � . L...J za, i =l
S�
( 42.39)
where the branches of the power functions are given by the condition z a; > 0 for z = z > 0, j = 1, 2, . . . , n. Since /(z), y(z), k(z) E S� , then F(z), Y(z), K(z) is analytic in the upper half-plane c + = {z : Imz > 0 } in the complex plane C . We denote by H the set of functions G(z) of complex variable z = z + iy, analytic in c + and satisfying the estimate I G(z)l :5 M(1 + l z i 2 )Pf 2 (1 + y-"), z E c + , for certain real non-negative constants M , p and q which do not depend on z. The set H called the Vladimirov algebra, is a multiplicative algebra relative to addition and multiplication of analytic functions, and multiplication of a function by a complex number. The following assertion is true - Vladimirov [2, p. 173] .
The algebras S� and H are isomorphic algebraically and topologically. The Fourier-Laplace transform is an isomorphism of S� onto H and the relation L[k(z) * y(z)](z) = K(z)Y(z) holds for any generalized functions k(z), y(z) E S� . Theorem 42.12.
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
848
Thus ( 42.34) has a solution in the space S.+ if and only if the solution Y(z) of the algebraic equation K(z)Y(z) = F(z) is in the Vladimirov algebra H. Further if Y E H , then a unique solution of (42.34) is given by the relation
y(z) = L - 1 [F(z)/K(z)].
( 42.40)
Here L - 1 is the inverse Fourier-Laplace transform which maps H onto Si. . If a function K(z) of the form (42.39) does not have zeros in c + , then 1/K(z) E H and hence Y(z) = F(z) /K(z) E H. In this case (42.34) is solvable in Si. for each f(z) E S.+ . Now we assume that the function K(z) has I zeros z = z; E c + , j = 1, 2, . . . , I. This set can not he infinite since then K(z) = 0. Therefore the function Y(z) = F(z)/K(z) is in H provided that the conditions F(z;) = L[f(z)](z;) = 0, j = 1 , 2, . . . , I, hold. We denote by N and N0 the sums of orders of zeros with positive and zero imaginary parts respectively, of the function K(z). Also if K(z) vanishes at origin of coordinates, then we shall not take this zero into account. Then the following expression is true
1
1
N = - [arg K(z)].y - - (N0 - 1m�n a; ) . �J� 21r 2
(42.41)
This follows from the generalized principle of argument - Gahov [1, p. 100]. Here [wJ.r means a change of w after a circuit in a positive direction along a closed contour ; consisting of an upper half-circle surrounding all zeros of K ( z) and of an interval of the real axis joining this half-circle. Thus we obtain the following statement.
Let N � 0 defined in (42.41) be the sum of orders of zeros with positive imaginary parts of a function K(z) of the form ( 42.39) analytic in c + and being the Fourier-Laplace of the generalized function k(z) given in (42.36) . If N = 0, then (42.34) is solvable in the space Si. for each f(z) E 84- . If N > 0 and Zt , z2 , . . . , z, are all zeros of K(z) with orders rt , r2, . . . , r,, r1 + r2 + + r, = N, such that Im z; > 0, j = 1, 2, . . . , I, then (42.34) is solvable in Si. if and only if the function F(z) = L[f(z)](z) has zeros z1 , z2 , . . . , z, with orders more or equal to r1 , r2 , , r, , respectively. If the solution exists, then it is unique and is given by (42.40). In the case N = 0 the solution of (42.34) can be also represented in the form y(z) = f(z) go(z) where uo(z) = L - 1 [1/K(z)] is the fundamental solution of the operator k( z) i.e. a generalized function with support in [0, +oo) satisfying the equation k(z) uo(z) = 6(z) where 6(z) is the Dirac delta-function. Let now the right-hand side f(z) in (42.34) he in the space D'+ consisting of generalized functions with support in [0, oo). This is obviously wider than S.+ . We construct the solution y( z) which also is in D'+.
Theorem 42. 13.
· · ·
• . •
*
*,
*
§ 42. ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF FRACTIONAL ORDER
849
Let c be a real non-negative constant such that c > max l zj I · 1Si 9 1/ K(z + ic) E H and the generalized function
Then
( 42.42) is, in general, in the space D'+ . We note that relation g(z) = go(z) holds in the case N = 0. We consider the following convolution
g(z) does not depend on c and the
k(z) * g(z) = L - 1 [K(z)] * e c:�: L - 1 [1/ K(z + ic)] = e c:�:(L- 1 [K(z + i c)] * L- 1 [1/K(z + ic)]) = e c:�: 6(z) = c5(z), where c5(z) is the delta-function. From this we obtain that the function g(z) is the fundamental solution of the operator k( z)• in the space D'+ and
( 42.43)
y(z) = /(z) * g(z). Hence we arrive at the following statement.
If f(z) E D'+, then a unique solution of (42.34) in the space D'+ is given by (42.43) where g(z) is the fundamental solution of the operator k(z) • in the form (42.42).
Theorem 42.14.
g(z) in the space D'+ can be in a narrower space. So if g(z) and / (z) are continuous on [O, oo), then y(z) in (42.43) is continuous on [0, oo) and (42.43) has the form
Remark 42.1. A generalized function
:1:
y(z) = j f(t)g(z - t)dt, z > 0. 0
This representation is also true in the case when
L 2 (a, b)Va, b E R1 }.
g(z), /(z) E L�oc
=
{
42.5. The application of fractional differentiation to differential equations of integer order We consider two examples in which the theory of fractional differentiation will be applied to the integration of ordinary differential equations of the second and nth order.
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
850
Example 42.3. We consider the following equation of second order
( 42 . 44) We shall find its solution as the fractional derivative y = V�0z(z) with 1>�0 = V� o + order p of which must be defined. Using the Leibniz relation given in (15.11) for fractional derivative in the form
zV�t 1 z(z) =V�t 1 (zz(z)) - (p + 1)V�0z(z) , zV�t2 z(z) =V�t 2 (z 2 z(z)) - 2(p + 2)V�t 1 (zz(z ))
+ (p + 1)(p + 2)V�0z(z), from ( 42.44) we obtain
1)�: 2 ([a 2 + b2 z + C2 z2]z(z)) + V�t 1 ([a t + bt z - 2c2 (P + 2)z - b2 (P + 2)]z(z ))
+ V�0 ([ao - bt (P + 1) + (p + 1)(p + 2)c2]z(z)) = 0. We shall find the solution of this equation in the space of functions z( z) integrable on any finite interval and satisfying the conditions z(z o ) = z'(z o ) = 0 2 which we need in order that the operator relations 1>�0 -Jz = -Jz V�0 and 1>�0 -J;.r = 2
� V�0 be valid when p < . 0. Then the previous equation can be written in the
form
�.
{ d� [:., (a2 + b,x + c2x2) + a1 + hJ x - 2c2 (p + 2)x - b2 (p + 2)] +ao - b , (p + 1) + c2 (p + l)(p + 2) } z(x) = ( 42 . 45) 0.
We define a parameter p as one of solutions of the quadratic equation
ao - b t (P + 1 ) + c2 (P + 1 ) (p + 2) = 0. Then from (42.45) we obtain the simple differential equation
( 42 . 46)
§ 42. ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF FRACTIONAL ORDER
851
the solution of which is easily given by the method of separation of variables, namely
( 42.47) Here the parameters a, b and c must satisfy appropriate conditions which ensure that the relations z(x0) = z'(x0) = 0 hold. Thus the solution of {42.44) has the form
(42.48) with the parameter p being defined in (42.46). The integral in {42.47) can be evaluated in different forms in accordance with the relations between its parameters. The detailed investigation of all its values and the corresponding representations of the function z{ x) was accomplished by Holmgren [2] (1967). Here we give only the results concerning one of these cases. Let c2 I 0, b� - 4a 2 c2 I 0. Then a2 + b2 x + c2 x 2 = c2 (x - a )(x - [3) , and after simple evaluation, the function z(x) from {42.47) h as the form � z(x) = �2+ 1 (x - a)P - 9+ 1 (x - fJa) p - r + 1 where q = � c �(a - fJ ) , r = - c�(a�fJ) and the conditions Re (p - q) > 0 or Re(p - r) > 0 when x0 = a or x0 = {3 respectively must be satisfied. The special case of (42.44) is the hypergeometric equation - Erdelyi, Magnus, Oberhettinger and Tricomi [1, 2.1(1)] - for which a2 = 0, b2 = 1, c2 = -1, a 1 = c, b 1 = -(a + b + 1), ao = -ab. Then the corresponding equation (42.46) yields the values Pt = a - 1 and P2 = b - 1. From (42.47) and (42.48), for the first of these parameters P1 = a - 1, we obtain the following representation for the solution of the hypergeometric equation: 1 a- c { 1 ) c-b - 1 . v0 -X y(X) - -na+ X _
(42.49)
This is a modification of the Euler integral representation given in {1.73), and also the expression 3 in Table 9.1. Evaluating the integral in (42.49) we arrive at the representation of the solution via the hypergeometric function in the form
y(x) = f (af (2- -c +c) 1) x 1 _c 2 F1 (1 + a - c, 1 + b - c ; 2 - c; x). Example 42.4. We consider the following ordinary differential equation of order
852 n
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
with binomial coefficients
(42.50) Using the integro-differentiation operators of arbitrary ord.er we construct one of the solutions of (42.50) in the form of ( n - I)-dimensional integral. For this we first introduce the polynomials
n
n 1: = IJ L b�: z bn (z - ,\k), 1: = 1 1: =0
(42.51)
where we denote by ,\ 1 , ,\ 2 , . . . , ,\n the roots of .,P(z) such that ,\j k = 1 , 2, . . . , n . Making the substitution
#; ,\1: , j #; k,
k= O
.,P(z) =
n
j,
y = exp(,\ 1 z)Y(z) ,
,\ 1
#; 0,
( 42.52)
and using the identity
we rewrite (42.50) in the form II'
(�t + � ) + (�t + � ) Y(z)
zt/1
We shall find the solution of this equation
as
Y(z) = 0.
( 42.53)
a derivative of order p, thus
dP
-
Y(z) = d Y1 (z) zP where the function conditions
Y1 (z)
is integrable on any interval
(0, a )
Y1 (0) = y�(O) = · · · = y�p - 1 ) (0) = 0.
and satisfies the
( 42.54)
§ 42. ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF FRACTIONAL ORDER
853
Then ( 42.53) is reduced to the following equation
(42.55) We introduce the polynomials (42.56) Since ,P(A1) = 0 then ,P1 (z) has order n - 1. By setting
(42.57)
we obtain that z
written in terms of the notation in (42.56). Hence under the conditions in (42.54) and a1 < 0 (42.50) is reduced to the equation (42.58) of order n - 1 . Continuing by analogy the above procedure of lowering the order, we arrive at the following system of differential equations of orders a; 1: -
( 42.59)
Here Yn-t (z) = exp(At,n-tz)(an equation of first order
+ bnz)- a• is the solution of the last simple (42.60)
854
and
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
z = .\ 1 ,m is the root of the equation 1/Jm (z) = 0 and 1/Jm( z) = z - 1 1/Jm - 1 (.\ 1 ,m - 1 + z), m = 1, 2, . . , n - 1, .
( 42.61 )
<po (z) = ,P(z), lrm = <J'm - 1 (.\ 1 ,m - 1 )/,P:,._ 1 (.\ 1 ,m - 1 ),
m = 1 , 2 , . . . , n.
( 42.62) (42.63)
We prove that .\ 1 ,m = .\m +1 - .\ m , m = 1 , 2, . . . , n - 1. From (42.56) , (42.51 ) and (42.61 ) we have the relations
n 1/J2 (z) = z - 1 1/J1(.\1,1 + z) = z- 1 bn II (z + .\ 1 + .\ 1 , 1 - .\t ). i= 2 Since z = .\ 1 , 1 is a root of the equation 1/J 1 (z) = 0, then we can set .\ 1 , 1 = .\2 - .\ 1 . Continuing such arguments for .\ 1 ,m , m = 2, 3, . . . , n - 1 we obtain .\ 1 ,m = .\m +1 - .\m , 1/Jm(z) = bn m = 1 , 2,
. .
n
II
k=m+1
(z + .\m - .\t ),
. , n - 1.
(42.64)
The conditions in (42.54 ) and a 1 < 0 are concerned with the function Similar conditions for other functions Yi ( z) have the form
Yt(O) = y�(O) = · · · = y�n - t) (O) = 0, k = 1, 2, . . . , n - 1, at < 0 , k = 1 , 2, . . , n, an = 0, .
Y1 (z).
( 42.65 )
the last condition an = 0 follows from Yn - 1 (0 ) = 0. Under these assumptions after convoluting the system in (42.59) we obtain the following representation for one of solutions of (42.50 ) :
(42.66)
§ 42. ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF FRACTIONAL ORDER
855
One may prove that (42.65) yields the following conditions for at :
ct 1 < 0, ctn < - 1 , «l'n - 1 < -1, ctn - 2 < -2, . . . , a-2 < - n + 2.
(42.67)
They can be extended if we use analytic continuation of the Abel integrals in (42.66). The special case of (42.50) for n = 2, a2 = bo = 0, 62 = -61 = 1 is the Kummer degenerate hypergeometric equation
zy" + (
c -
z) y' - ay = 0 .
(42.68)
For this equation
0,
c -
a, a-2 = a ,
a-2 < - 1 . The solutio:O: given in ( 42.66) for
f(1 - a ) 1 -c �: z e 1 F1 ( 1 - a ., 2 - c,. -z ) , f(2 _ c)
(42.69)
where 1 F1 is the Kummer degenerate hypergeometric function defined in ( 1 .81 ) , an d give also by formula 9 in Table 9.1. Here the conditions c - a < 0, a < - 1 c an b e extended t o the ones c - a < 1 , a < 1 which ensure the convergence of the integral.
856
CHAPTER
8.
APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
§ 43. Bibliographical Remarks and Additional Information to Chapter 8 43. 1 . Historical notes
[3; § 6, 10] (1948). § §§ [2-5) (1952-1955).(40.19) [5) (1955) 0 40.2 [7) (1960), 0). [8] (1963),�) [10, 11] (1965) [14] (1970) (40.22). 0 [8] (1963) L� [10] (1965)K, ,o 40. 2 (18.8) - § 43.2, (40.140.8) 1. (40.19) 0 [5] (1979), [7] (1981), [9] (1985) 40.1-40.3 [1] (40. 2 3). (1823). (40.2[1]0) {1915). [3] (1953) §40.21)-{40. 2-40.3 23) [4] {1976), [9] {1978) (40. 1) 1sign #J I {40.26), {40.27) §§ (40.48). (41.1)(1772) [1 , 177, 426-432] {41.1) [1] 0(1823),{3 1/2. (41.25) 0 (41.22) [1, 40, 381-395] (1860). (41.1) {3 (41.2) 1. O, (41.31 ), 0 1948(41.14). [ 1 ] (1881) [1], 1915, [1] {41.25) 0, 0 1 (41.1 ), (41.25) {41.26) 1923. {41.1), (41.2) (41.25) 0, 1/6[1] yu�� [1-3]o, [1-3,7]. [3] (1953), [8] (1965). [ 3 ] {41.31) {41.31 ), {41.22) 41.1 {41.2) 0, 0 [1] (1957). 1/2. (41.18) {41.19) [5) {1976). 41.2
Note to
40.1. The presentation in this subsection follows the book by Vekua
Notes to 40.2 and 40.3. The method of fractional integro-difl'erentiation for the differential equations in generalized axially symmetric potential theory was first considered by Weinstein In the paper and also he proved relations connecting the solutions of with I' = ..\ = with eaCh other for different values of the parameter p by means of the fractional integral (Lemma with ..\ = This idea was developed by Erdelyi and who investigated the properties
given in In particular, in the papers and of the differential operator he proved Lemma in the case ..\ = and its analogue for the Erdelyi-Kober operator defined in note On the basis of these statements Erdelyi found relations connecting the solutions of and with I' = ..\ = with each other for different values of p by means of the Erdelyi-Kober operators. The results of Erdelyi were generalized by Lowndes who proved Lemmas and the relations in We also note that such an idea embryo was in fact suggested in Poisson "Expressions of conformity" of the form were indicated by Weinstein though such results had already appeared in Darboux The presentation in follows the papers by Marichev with in certain modifications in and with inserting the regulator (signxt + and Notes to 41.1 and 4:1.2. Equation as a special case of a more general equation was first obtained by Euler p. in connection with his investigations concerned with the motion of air in pipes of different section, and with the vibration of strings of variable thickness. Euler found the solution of with < = p• < Such an equation of the form with q = was solved by Poisson who obtained the hyperbolic analogue of the representation for the solution given in called the Poisson representation. The general solution of for p• = was given by Riemann p. He constructed the solution of the Cauchy problem by using a certain auxiliary function, and the method was called by his name later The fundamental solution of with q = i .e. the solution of was first indicated by Beltrami in the case 2p = This result was extended to p > only in by Weinstein who found two representations for such a solution. We note that in much later than Euler and Poisson, with q =
§ 43. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER
::/:- 0
8
857
(41.23) (41.24) (1] (1968).(1-3] [ 1 -3], (1] (1951)(41.35) 41.4 - [2)[[.12]] (1823) (1985). R1 3, 1. (41.35) (41.36) [2] (1953) +1 , uP y1 -2pu1 -p , P (41.40). u uP u� u y (41.35) (40.20). 41.3 (8] (1983). (1] (1975) (41.46)-(41.49) (41.2) 0 41.5 [2] (1947). 41. 5 41.1/2.4 (5) (1976) D112y y/x (1] (1918)[1] (1919). 'D��2y y/x 2 nl} y (1y] fx,(1925), [3, 99] (1982), 1 J F('D�\ y (x); x)dx.
q was proved by Marichev. The relations in and were fmmd by Berger and Handelsman Theorem was proved by Gordeev In the case {3* = {3 this result in other notation was known earlier - Bitsadze Smimov and Gilbert The space was introduced by K.I. Babenko who proved Theorem see also Notes to .§ 41 .3. Equation was first considered by Poisson in the case n = p :::: The Cauchy problem given in and was investigated by Weinstein for different values of the parameter p. He obtained the solution of this problem in the form Weinstein indicated and used the relations = connecting the solutions = of the equation of the fonn with each other for different values of p The presentation in subsection follows the paper by Berger and Handelsman except for obtained by Lowndes Notes to § 41 .4. The Dirichlet problem for with q = was first considered by Velma In particular, he proved Theorem in this case. Theorem for any real q as well as other results in subsection were obtained by Marichev with certain more accurate definitions in the case p = Notes to § 42.1. The paper by O'Shaughnessy was probably the first where the methods for solving the equation = were discussed. Two solutions of such an equation were suggested by O'Shaughnessy and discussed by Post They were essential
[1]41.(1975). 3
=
different because really they were the solutions of two different equations, namely =
and Mandelbrojt
=
but this was not taken into account by O'Shaughnessy and Post. Later see also Volterra p. arrived at a differential equation of
fractional order in investigating the extremum problem for the functional
0
Mandelbrojt had assumed that the corresponding variations are equal to zero and obtained the differential equation of fractional order = with Cauchy conditions. The paper a > by M. Fujiwara where, in particular, the equation = containing the Hadamard fractional differentiation operator defined in was considered, may also be regarded as a prehistory of the theory of differential equations of fractional order. The first serious step in this theory was made by Pitcher and Sewell who proved Theorems and on the existence and uniqueness of the solution of the Cauchy-type problem for the equation under other conditions than those in subsection = Barrett obtained the solution of provided that the conditions in hold. These results were generalized later in the papers by Al-Bassam Al-Abedeen and Al-Abedeen and Arora They proved certain theorems similar to the corresponding theorems from the theory of linear ordinary differential equations. The presentation in § is based on the simplified results from the above papers. Notes to § 42.2. The main presentation in this subsection follows the paper by M.M. Dzherbashyan and Nersesyan The solution of is given in M.M . Dzherbashyan and the solution of is well known, for example, Titchmarsh Notes to § 42.3. The Dirichlet problem for was investigated by M.M. Dzherbashyan Nahushev and Aleroev The presentation in § follows the above papers by Nahushev. Note to § 42.4. The presentation in this subsection follows the papers by Didenko Kochura and Didenko Notes to § 42.5. The idea of applying fractional integro-differentiation to constructing solutions of ordinary differenti� equations was first suggested by Liouville who considered Using the idea of Liouville this equation was studied by Holmgren Sohncke and Letnikov part Ill] A more complete and detail investigation was given by Letnikov.
Fa ('D�+y(x); x] 0 1 )ay(x), 0, (!Di)(x) (ax y 'Di(18.54) (1] (1938) 42.1 42.2 ('D� y)(x) f(x, y) 42.1 . (1] (1954) + {42.11) {42.10) ( 4 ) (1965), [ 8 ] (1982), (1] (1976) [1] (1978). 42.1 [6(42.] (1968). (42.81) (1]. (7), 8"(42.) 26) [8] (1970), (4) (1976), (5) (1977) [1 , 2] (1982). 42.3 (173) (1984}, [1] (1985). (3] (1832), (42. 4 4). [2] (1867), [1] (1867) (4, (1874). [1] (1933)
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
858
Equation (42.50) was also investigated by many authon. The methods of fractional calculus were used by Letnikov (9] (1888) , Nekrasov (2] (1888}, (4] (1891) and Karasev (1] (1957), and also Alekseevskii (1] (1884). The presentation in. § 42.5 follows the papen by Letnikov (4] (1874), [9] (1888) and Holmgren [2] (1867).
43.2. Survey of other results (relating § § 4G-42) 4:0.1 Erdelyi [8, 10, 14) proved the statement for the second Erdelyi-Kober operator in (18.8) similar to Lemma 40.2 in the case = 0.
A a > o, I E 2 (o, ) x2'1- 1 /(x) x2'1 /'(x) L,<�>K-,,aJ(x) = K-,,a L,<�_>01 /(x) L��) K,,a L��> cx-2'1 f(x)) = x-2'1L(_:J f(x) I0a+ ;�2 L(�), l = L(�) 1001+ ;�2 I' 1-01;�2 L,(�) l = L(�) 1-01;�2 I
Lemma 4:3.1 . Let Then
where
antl
oo tuul
C
antl
be integrable at infinitr.
are giv en in (40.22) antl (18.8), re•pectiv elr.
It was noted that by using the relation 'l-Ot
the relations
'1-0l
follow from Lemmas 40.2 and 43.1 under the appropriate assumptions indicated by Erdelyi [8). These relations were generalized by Lowndes [5], thus
J>.01L'1(�) / - (L'1(�)-a A2 )J>.01 /' R>.01 L'1(�) / - (L'1(�)-a - A2)R>.01/ J>. (f1,a), R>. (f1 ,a) Jf R� Jf = x2a+2'1 J>.(fJ,a)x-2'1 /, R�J = x-2'1 R>.(f1,a)x2a+2'1 f. � J>.f(x) = J�f(x) = Jl f'(x) = j Jo(AJx2 0 /(0) = +
where the operators
and are connected with the generalized Erdelyi-Kober operators defined in (37.45) and (37.46) by the expressions
In particular (Lowndes [7]), the following representations hold
t 2 ) f ' (t)tlt
0;
00
R>.f(x) = R�f(x) = -Rl!'(x) = j Jo(A Jt2 � = A j pJl (AJt2 � - 2 f( ) J>. R>. x2 )J ' (t)dt
00
f(x) -
provided that t 1/
t 2 - x2
x2 )J(t)dt,
t - 0 as t - oo and the operators inverse to
and
are evaluated from
§ 43. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER
8
859
{J� ) -1 f(x) Ji� f(x), (R� ) -1 f(x) Ruf(x) 3,37.57 37.58) . 7 40.1. f E C2 (b, ) b > 0, x-1/2f(x) -+ 0, x1/2 /'(x) -+ 0, x-1/2 f"(x) -+ x -+ R� f"(x) = ( � - ..X2) R� f(x), 0. o, 5 > f E C2 (b, ) b > 0, j(A:) (x) O(e-6� ) 2 f(x). k 1, Ri� f"(x) ( � + ..X ) �� mma 43.2 r � 1 e (..X r ) 11 r 11 K o (� - _x2)11 0 (�3 - .,X2 )11 0 u r, r J�aux2 + y22, + uyyu +r-1 , r 0 Jx2 + y2 + z2 ,11 R u �2u u�� + uyy 0 Ip(fl, a) 39.2 37.� 4.), 2 "'Y( ) x1 -"'Y -x dxd 1+"'Y-dxd x2 dxd 2 + 1 + -y)x-.d +m m 0, [x10'1+) 1 f(x) -+ 0 xa-+> 0, f E C2 (o,b), b > 0, x'1 j( )(x), 0, 1,
the results = = ) and { - { that another form of the first relation was indicated by Vekua [ p. 69). Lowndes [ ) also proved two statements similar to Lemma oo ,
Lemma 43.2. Let oo.
48
= O,
0,
a.nd
.X �
Then
Lemma 43.3.
oo ,
Let
=
2. Then
We mention
=
a.nd
48 X -
oo ,
.X �
All these results were applied to solving certain boundary value problems for the Laplace equation with mixed boundary conditions. It was noted that on the basis of Le we can and = of the generalized Helmholtz-type obtain the fundamental solutions = equations = and = from the fundamental solutions = - In = = = of the Laplace equations and = = and = u�� using the result = Uz z = Let be the operator given in § (note M
Lowndes at and
�
=
proved that if as
p
(
=
dx
m
=
2, is integrable
O, then
i..X, 0.
where = .X or p = .X > He obtained a similar statement in the case a < O, and applied these results to finding the complete set of solution of ( ) and the equation
40.18
p > -1/2, 0. �) 40.2, 40.3 43.1 L� I�,{J,e 18.6 a > o, e 1 f E 02 (0, b), b > 0, x11+ A: (lnx)6 j(A:) (x), k II 1,=
from the corresponding complete set of solutions of the above equations with .X = The results similar to Lemmas and and connecting the operator the operators 1;: •e
with
and defined in § 23.2, note were obtained by Kilbas, Saigo and Zhuk [ ] For example, they proved that if and {3 are real nwnbers, min(O,( - {3), 5 = if ( "¢ {3 and 5 = if ( = {3, = O, 2, is integrable at then
00, 1 .
40.2--40.3
40.2. The method used in §§ and based on Lemmas applied by Erdelyi [ ] to the generalized Stokes-Beltrami system
11
11) {2p 1
(2p
40.1--40.3, 43.1--43.3 { 43.1 ) {41.3" )
was
the solutions (u, of which called + 2)-dimensional conjugate symmetric potentials. Such an idea is conditioned by the fact, follows from ( ) that u is a solution of with r = called a + 2 )-dimen8iona.l 8ymmetric potential. Extending the investigations by Pahareva and Virchenko [ ] and also Polozhii [ ] Erdelyi [ p. 221] proved that if (u, 11)
y,
43.1 , 1-3 , 11,
860
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
is a (2p + 2)-dimensional potential, then
(f71>p- 112 u, ,cr
y 2cr L0(Ycr) v) is a (2p + 2a + 2)-dimensional ,
potential provided that p > -1/2, p + 01 > -1/2. Here ���l is the Erdelyi-Kober operator I, ,a given in (18.8) and applied with respect to y. Erdelyi [14] used the technique of fractional integro-differentiation to extend the results of Friedlander and Heins [1] who considered (40.19) with 0, i.e. (41.25) with q 0. Erdelyi applied his idea to derive representations for the solutions of the form (41.6) from the solution of the wave equation. Earlier this idea was used by Copson and Erdelyi [1] to investigating solutions of a certain boundary value problem for (40.19) with � = 0. 40.3. Representations more general than (41.22) of the solution via analytic functions of the form (41.22) for (40.18) with 0 and of the form (40.33) for (40.18) with � = 0 were obtained by Krivenkov [1] and Henrici [1], respectively. 40.4. Copson [5] considered the Dirichlet problem for the hyperbolic equation (40.19) with � 0 in the quadrant > 0, y > 0. By using the Riemann method he constructed the solution of this problem for < y and > y. He then showed that this solution and its derivatives are continuous for sufficiently large I" + p when they pass across the line y = provided that the given boundary values and ( , y ) satisfy the equation if p, and 0) if p > Here I, , a is the Erdelyi-Kober the equation = operator defined in (18.8).
I"= � =
=
I" = � =
=
xx
x u(x,O) u O u(O, x) H�!���� x-1 111- l ,p-llu(x,
I"·
u(x,O) = u(O,x)x, I" =
40.5. Weinstein [7) studied certain properties of the operator applied them to investigating the solutions of the equation
Pk = In particular, he proved that if
u(xl tx2 , ... ,xn)
is any
L�z) defined in (40.22) and
const .
(43.2)
solution of this equation, then
Pl = · · · = Pn =
is another solution. In the case 0 this property is sometimes called Kelvin's theorem. 40.6 . Radzhabov [1-4] and Radzhabov, Sattarov and Dzhabirov [J-2], and also the papers cited there, investigated in detail the properties of solutions, including fundamental solutions, for equations of elliptic type of the form (40.18) and (43.2) with singularities in coefficients, and for certain their analogues and iterative generalizations. They obtained integral representations for the solutions of these equations and the solutions of the certain boundary value problem such as Dirichlet, Neumann, "mixed" , etc. They used and developed the ideas connected with the relations given in (40.20) and Lemma 40.2, and the methods by Gilbert [2] and Weinstein [6]. They found the structure of solutions for the iterative equations of high order decomposed as compositions of equations of the form (43.2). Such equations of mainly hyperbolic type, and the Cauchy and Cauchy-Goursat boundary value problems for them were investigated by Kapilevich [1-4) , etc. He used the technique of hypergeometric functions of several variables. In particular, in the papers [1-3] he first constructed the Riemann and Green-Hadamard functions for (40.19), and found the solutions of the Cauchy and Cauchy-Goursat problems. In [4) Kapilevich obtained the solution of an analogue of a half-homogeneous problem given in ( 41.36) for the equation
(-asa22 asa 2 - -aax22 ) m u - c2m u = O a
+ -- + b 8
861 8 oFm -t(at. ··· •am -1 •z) [1]. = [1, 2] e = emU(x,uzz =UeeU0(x) U {x,O) = U (x), [1]. 2p = e 2)-1 1, r = (1p - 1/2, 2p)e1/(1-2P) U(x, e) = u(x,r) [1 . 2] [) U(x, '7) e= U0(x) Ut (x). [2] U(x, '7), Ut(x) ���-1 (U0(x) [1] -U0(a)) em uzzLq .uu = = e= § 43. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER
in terms of the integral operator involving the function in the kernel Erdelyi,. Magnys, Oberhettinger and Tricomi + 0 40.7. Chen investigated properties of the solutions of the equation near the singular line 0 with dependence on properties of the functions 0} and in particular, on their Holder nature - Chen Making the changes and he reduced this equation to the m (m + one given in (41 .311 ), 0 < < and applied the method of analytic continuation in a complex domain in two variables to the latter equation. This method is presented in the papers by Lewy and it is adjoined to the known method given in the book by Vekua 3 . According to such an approach each solution of the above equation corresponds to a certain analytic function, the real and imaginary parts of which are expressed for 0 via fractional integrals of the functions and In this paper Chen indicated such integer solutions fractional derivatives of which have the norms satisfying special estimates in terms of the norms of or in the space Usanetashvili proved the existence and uniqueness of the regular solution of the mixed boundary value problem for the equation + o, m const > 0, in which the values of the conormal derivative of the desired solution are specified in the elliptic part of thedmundary, and the conditions on the line of degeneracy o contain the ruemann-Liouville fractional integrals and derivatives defined in subsection 2.3. 40.8. The uniqueness and existence of the solution of certain boundary value problems with boundary conditions involving the Riemann-Liouville fractional inte�differentiation operatoiS were proved for equations of "mixed" type by Hasanov lsamukhamedov and Oramov Ivashkina and Nevostruev Ktunykova Nahushev Salahitdinov and Mengziyaev For the generate hyperbolic equations they were proved by Kumykova Orazov Salahitdinov and MiiSubarov Nahushev and Borisov and Zhemukhov investigated the first, second and mixed boundary value problems for the loaded parabolic equation, and the Darboux problem for the second-order degenerate loaded hyperbolic equations, respectively. The loaded parts contained the Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals and derivatives - § 43.2, note 42.5. 40.9. Kochubei considered the Cauchy problem
[1, 2].
[1],
[6],[1], [2. 3],
[1],
[1]
[1]
[1), [1]. [2],
(2]
(D(a)x)(t) = x{ ), A t
0<
t
<
T,
x(O) = xo ,
for the equation with the closed linear operator A in a Banach space, and the "regularized" fractional derivative
vg+
(2.22).
where is the fractional differentiation operator defined in He found conditions on the resolvent (A - ..\E)- 1 of the operator A which yield the unique solvability of the Cauchy problem. The results were applied to the ''mixed" problem for differential equations in partial derivatives with fractional differentiation in the "time" variable. The case when A = L is the second order elliptic differential operator in n variables was especially treated in Kochubei The corresponding Cauchy problem:
(3]. (D�a)x){y, t) = Lx(y, t), y E Rn , �p(y) y [1].Rn
t
0< <
T,
u(y,O) = �p(y),
known as the fractional diffusion problem, was proved to have a unique solution under the appropriate assumption on and the coefficients of the operator L. In the case when L is Laplacian, the fundamental solution was explicitly found in term of the Fox H-function, and its integrability in over was proved. In this connection we refer to the papeiS by Wyss and Schneider and Wyss
[1]
862
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
40.10. Chanillo and Wheeden (1] applied two-weighted estimates for the fractional integration operators - § 29.2, note 25.8 - to obtain infonnation about the number of negative eigenvalues of generate elliptic operators in divergence fonn. Kerman and Sawyer [1) used their characterization of the so-called trace inequality for potential operators to study the domain and essential spectrum of the SchrOdinger operator H = - 6 - V, where 6 is Laplacian and V is a nonnegative measurable function on Rn . 4:1.1 . Following Vekua [2] (Theorem 41 .5), Olevskii [1] solved the Dirichlet problem for (41.2) with q = 0 in the cases of a half-sphere and a half space in � , under certain conditions on p. In the case of a half-sphere this result was extended by Huber [1] to arbitrary p. The analogues statement for the equation of the form (40.18) with � = 0 in the case of a quarter sphere in Rn was obtained by Hall, Quinn and Weinacht [1) for any p and J.l. · Vollrodavov [1] and Evsin (1 , 2] constructed the fundamental solutions of (41.2) , and solved the Dirichlet problem for the semi-disk {:�:2 + 112 < 1 , 11 > 0} and the Neumann-Dirichlet problem for the domain for which the boundary contains the interval (- 1, 1] of the axis O:z:, respectively. 4:1.2. The Cauchy problem given in (41.35) and (41 .36) was studied by Diaz and Weinberger [1] , Blum (1] considered all values of p including the singular ones, 2p = -1, -3, -5, . . . . We also note that one may find reviews of investigations concerning the singular Cauchy problem given in (41 .36), and the regular Cauchy problem with the conditions of the fonn (41 .36) on the line 11 = � > 0, in the papers by E.C. Young [1] and Asral [1], respectively. 4:1.3. Saigo [2, 4, 5], see also [6-8], studied the three boundary value problem Jor the Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation (41 .1) in the domain < e < 11 < 1 with boundary conditions involving the integral operators I�f·" and I�!·" given in § 23.2, note 18.6. The first Goursat-type problem the following boundary conditions
o
has
IOa,b, {J * -a
+
-1
u (O, Tl ) = cp1 (Tl ) ,
Two other problems are the so-called problems with shift, and their investigation was begun by Nahushev [1]. In this context we refer also to Bzhikhatlov, Karasev, Leskovskii and Nahushev [1] . The boundary conditions have the form
in the second problem and
Aeb+ fJ+fJ* - 1 �: ,p• -a - 1 u (O , t) + B(1 - t)c+fJ+/3* - 1 I;�fJ -/3 * ,c ,p• -a - 1 u (e, 1) = cp2 (t ) Here A , B, a, b, c, d are given constants and cp 1 and cp2 are given functions in
in the third one. all three problems. The second problem coincides with that in the paper by Nahushev [1] in the case when A and B are given functions and {3* = {3, a = -b = -c = {3 - 1. All these problems were reduced to singular integral equations with a Cauchy kernel, and methods from the book by Gahov [1] were applied to their solution. Srivastava and Saigo [1] expressed solutions of the above problems in terms of Kampe de Feriet functions of two variables. They also considered some of the special circumstance in which the Kampe de Feriet function can be reduced to the relatively simpler hypergeometric functions. We also note that Orazov [l] generalized the results of Nahushev [1]. Volkodavov and Repin [1] solved one more problem of such a type with the operators I�/·" and I�!·" . Repin [1)
863
§ 43. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 8
investigated the above second boundary value problem for the equation y 2 uzz - uyy + duz = 0 in the special domain. 41.4. By using a Fourier transfonn in the space of the generalized functions Bresters [3) constructed the solution of the Cauchy problem given in (41.36) for the equation
n 2 2 """" a u - a u 2 2 � ax i 8y i =1
au - ..\2 u = 0. - 2p !I 8y
A relation for the solution has the form
u(x, y) =
2 ISn l
f1 -r(x + yt)
-1
cos
( ..\y y'i":ti)
y'i":t2
dt
- (41 .37) - and generalizes the classical solution for such a problem from the paper by E.C. Young
[1].
41.5. Bureau [1-3] investigated the Cauchy problem for the equation in partial derivatives of the hyperbolic type. In particular, the wave equation ( 40.19) and the Euler-Poisson-Darboux equations (41 .1) and (41.35) were considered. He used the concepts of a finite and logarithmic parts of divergent integrals denoted by pJ and pi respectively, and related to the Hadamard definition - § 5.5. In particular, by using these ideas some results from the papers by Weinstein [1-3) were extended. We give some of his definitions. Let A (t) e em be represented in the fonn
m-1
A(t) = L: A��x) (t - x) i + Bm(t), Ai (x) = A( i ) (x), i =O in the neighbourhood of a point x and let
J A(t)(x - t)•dt, Z'
I.(x) =
Q
Then we set
/ A(t)(x - t)-m-l' dt - P(e; m - 1, m + l')]
z-�
[ p fl-m -l' (x) = �lim -o
Q
J Bm(t)(x - 1)-m-l' dt, Z'
=P(t� - x; m - 1, m + I') +
Q
.
- 1 (x) p /I-m (x) =P(t� - x; m - 2, m) + (-1)m - 1 Am (m - 1 ) ! ln(x - t�) +
Z'
f Bm t(t)m dt, (x - )
Q
864
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
(x) . pll.(x)
A p II-m ( ) =(-1)m m- 1 (m - 1)!
x
'
= 0,
where 0 < I' < 1, m = 1, 2 , 3, . . . .
•
#; -m,
ll.
Bureau proved basic properties of p I I. and p such as various estimates, commutation with the operator of differentiation and connection with the Cauchy principal value of an integral. He extended all of these results to multidimensional integrals, and made a survey of the applications of these ideas to partial differential equations.
41.6. Cheng [1, 2] investigated some "mixed" boundary value problems with a condition on the singular line for (41.25) with q = 0 and its generalization. 41.7. Wood [1] investigated the problem of finding the fundamental solution of the equation = 0 provided that the fundamental solution for the simpler equation uxx = 0 is known. In the case = this problem was solved by using Uxx fractional integration.
2 -2 ++ uyyu.u+uu + w2+w c-2 (z)uc (z)u
c(z) z
41.8 . Clements and Love [1] considered two "mixed" Heumann-Dirichlet problems concerning finding a function = harmonic in the half-space > 0 provided that the values and are given in different parts of the plane = 0 with a jump for r = a and = b. According to Copson [3] the solution of these problems the form
2 2 Vz V V( r, z ), r Jx + y ,
r
hasz
z
!p fP) l /2 V(r,z) ..!.. f u(p)p8p f (z2 + r2 - d2rpcos 00
=
211'
0
1r
- 1r
and therefore can be reduced to solving in succession, the Abel-type equations
f Jxpu(2p)dp2 (x), f Vpu (2p)-xdp2 h(x), p b
X
a
and the equation
I(
X
)+
= It
_
P
X
2( -1) 6 11'
where 6 = 0 or 6 = 1.
=
f (xt)6xl(t) 2t2 dt - ( ) O < x < c= �, c
0
1-
-
1/
X '
41.9. Belonosov [1, 2] investigated certain boundary value problems for the biharmonic equation = 0 in the case of plane two-connected domains. To solve these problems he used fractional differentiation in a complex plane defined in (22.4) with £ = (-ioo , ioo) and the expressions connecting with the Laplace transform - § 7.2 and § 9.2, notes 7.2 and 7.4.
�2u
a) j(l(a)
41.10. Shinbrot [1] indicated certain sufficient conditions for the existence of a weak solution with the fractional derivative 1)�+ 0 < 01 < 1/2, in the "time" variable for the Navier-Stokes equation. He obtained the norm estimate in for such a derivative. This problem was first considered by Lions [1) who found such an estimate in the case 0 < 01 < 1/4 under certain assumptions on the dimension of the space.
u
u,
L2
u
41.1 1 . Senator [1] obtained Schauder and Lp estimates for the solution of elliptic boundary value problems with the boundary conditions containing pseudodifferential operators with non-smooth symbols and normal derivatives of fractional order.
8
§ 43. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER
[1] w(x, + V0+w(x, = 0, x 0, 0, 0 < < 1, �: o llw(x, - /o(t)I IL = 0, 1 � < oo,
41.12. Berens and Westphal d
dx
>
t)
t)
-
1>6+
considered the Cauchy problem
"Y
t)
lim
where
865
-y
t>
p
P
(5.�:6) = W� w ) [1] y(x)
is the Riemann-Liouville fractional differentiation operator defined in
applied
with respect to t. They constructed the solution of this problem in the form fo where in Lp(O, oo) for any > w.., is a semigroup of a class 42.1 . By using the Picard method and the Schauder fixed-point principle, Tazali proved two theorems which yield conditions for the existence of the solution of the Cauchy-type problem
Co
x 0.
('V:+ y)(x) = f(x, y(x)), a < x � a+ h, h > 0; (v:_;1 y)(x) l�:=a = b, 0 < a � 1.
a = 1. [a(10. , b) 19)
These statements generalize the known results by Caratheodory in the case Grin'ko proved the existence and uniqueness theorem for the solution of a nonlinear differential equation with a generalized fractional derivative inverse to in the Holder weighted space on a finite interval of the real line. He also constructed the approximation solution of this equation, and obtained the estimate for such a solution. Arora and Alshamani investigated the stability properties for the Cauchy-type problem given in and Hadid and Alshamani proved the estimate at infinity for the solution of this problem under the appropriate assumptions on 42.2. A series of papers is concerned with the investigation of systems of linear differential equations of fractional order mainly in the space V' of generalized functions - § notes to §§ and Veber found the solution of the Cauchy problem for the system of equations 0 with a constant matrix The asymptotic behavior as oo of different solutions of this system including the fundamental matrix was studied by lmanaliev and Veber and Veber The Cauchy problem for the system
[1] H�([a, b), p), p(x) = (x - a)�'(b - x)", (42.2) (42.3). [1] [1]
8.1 8.[32]. Ay(x), < a < 2, [1] [5, 6].
f(x, y).
A.
y(a) (x) = A(x)y(x) f(x), 1 < a � = 1,2, ... , A(x) x A(x) = A = +
n-
n, n
9.1 , x - y(a)(x) = [7), [1].
(43.3)
with the continuous matrix-function for � 0 was investigation by Veber and the fundamental solution of such a system with a constant matrix const was considered by Veber The case of a single equation was considered in the paper by Veber Veber proved the criterion of "passivity" for the systems
[8].[6]
Ay'(x) By(a) (x) + Cy(x) = g(x), < a < 1, (43.3) x - oo. (2; A, B,86,C,278) 0 < a[1;< 1 34, 58, 209]. [1], +
0
(43.4)
more general than with constant matrices and found quasi-asymptotic expansions of their fundamental solutions as The definition of the above concepts can be found, for example, in the books by Vladimirov p. and Vladimirov, Drozhzhinov and Zav'yalov p. We also note that the solution of the equation of the form with was constructed by Seitkazieva who used the method based on the Laplace transform.
(43.4)
866
CHAPTER
8. [1]
APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
Bykov and Botashev equation of the form (43.4):
y'(x)
reduced one problem in studying (watering the furrows) to an
,\ I[1 + b(x-t)-a]y'(t)dt, 0 < a < 1. �
= q -
0
One may find other examples of applied problems reduced to differential equations and systems of differential equations with fractional derivatives in the paper by Veber 42.3. Srivastava, Owa and Nishimoto proved the following statement in terms of the fractional differentiation operator fv(z) := (V + lr f)(z) and - in the case , when = .C"' (z) or = .C o (z).
0
0
Theorem 43.1. Let
=
[8].
[1]
exp
0
(22.17), (22.18) (22.21)
be 4n41ytic in 4 dom4in
D in the complex pl4ne z.
{ I "'(+11· 1; } I ( { I +· 1; d })
z)
..,..
'
z)
dz
z)
exp
4nd f11 (z) exiat., then the equ4tion fv(z) = �.p(11 ; z)f(z), z
'"
If
- II
E D, h4a 4 aolution of the form
[1]
In the paper by Nishimoto, Owa and Srivastava such a result was obtained for more general equation fv(z) =
+[1 , 2]
was considered. Special solutions for such equations with power-type coefficients were found by Wiener Hadid and Grzaslewicz and Campos 42.5. Nahushev considered the problem of the proper solution for the equation
[3],
[1] [2] Ka = vg+ xP
j= l
(9].
a; ( x) V��
+ b(x)
where
o1 ([o, 1]), a; > 0 0 < a < 1, f3 > 0, a > a1 > · · · > 0 > · · · > am , { b(x), c(x) E 0([0, 1]). o([o, 1]), a; < 0. 0-ylx({O,"Y
Let max �e[o , t) then for
Op {(O ,
1)) be a Banach space of functions and let "'Y be a constant. Nahushev proved that if
Oo ({O,
if
if
with the norm l l
=
there exists a unique solution of the above equation in the space
§ 43. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 8
867
[3] ym uz:z: uyy a(x,y)uz: b(x, y)uy c(x, y)u = 0 D E {y 0} 0 << xx << 1,1 Ox. K u = \li(x), 0 1 K1 Ka a = 1. y-o 42.6. [1, ] u"(x) a(x)'D�\u(x) = f(x), 0 x 1, 0 <= 0,< a(x)1. = A P 0 u(O) Pu'(O) = u(1) = 0 (x) f 0(0,1]= A c2 (0,1], au(O) Pu'(O) = , au(1) ,8u'(1) = "(, a(x) '"" I AA: , -2 1 2 a) A:= l A = AA: a(x) =A A,= A u(O) = 0, u(1) = 0 A:E , ( - A) AA: (1.91). 2-a 2 AA: = O(k2-a ) k 142]. y { n ) - Ay (1] [1]. 42.7. 151), (1) In another paper Nahushev
studied the ''mixed" boundary value problem for the equation
+
+
+
+
in a bounded domain > the boundary of which contains the interval axis The boundary condition on this interval has the form lim
of the where
is the value of the above operator when On the basis of the extremum principle obtained in the paper the stability and uniqueness of the solution of this problem were proved, and a question of the existence of such a solution was considered. Aleroev 2 investigated the spectrum of the Dirichlet problem for the differential equation �
+
when and
(43.5)
�
He proved that the problem with the conditions + for � does not have negative eigenvalues in the space of functions n and the problem with the conditions "( + + has eigenvalues but not more than a continuum set. The inequality at
L.J
� 16
00
r
(2 -
for the eigenvalues of the problem was also proved. We also note that earlier Nahushev (5) showed that is an eigenvalue of the latter problem if and only if is a zero of the Mittag-Leffier function defined in All these zeros, the moduli of which are sufficiently large, are simple zeros and they have the estimates as - oo - Dzherbashyan [2, p. The asymptotic behaviors of the eigenvalues, and problems of the uniform convergence for the differential operator given on a finite interval of the real axis with boundary conditions concentrated at the end points of this interval and containing the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives given in § 2.3, were considered by Bogatyrev and Amvrosova Using the relations of realization of operators, for example, see Gel'fand and Shilov [2 . p. Malakhovskaya and Shikmanter suggested a method for constructing a generalized solution of the Cauchy problem for the integro-difl'erential equation
y(t))a dt = f(x), x 0, Qn (_!!_dx_) y(x) - a I (x-t (O) = a , = 0,1, ... ,n 1, 0 < a < 1 Q42.8. n (x) Yj [1] j n. Otj , -1 Otj < O, (42.34} (1.91}. Otj = 1}/n ] ( } 30 z:
>
0
with the conditions j where and at is a rational number and is a polynomial of order Leskovslcii constructed the linear independent solutions of the homogeneous equation with specific distinct exponents in the form of a Mittag-Leffier � function defined in The special solution of the inhomogeneous equation (42.34) with (j was first found by Davis [2 - 4 .6 and § 4.2, note 2.5 and §§ and 34. An equation of the same type with constant coefficients
Aof(x) �n ;�J 1(y x)OtJ -l f(y)dy = o, Reaj J =l +
r
.)
c
_
�
>
o,
868
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
was studied by Alonso [1]. He proved that the solution of this equation has the form /(z) = e-'1% if and only of the parameter '1 satisfies the conditions Re, > 0,
�0 +
E �j'l-a; j=l n
= 0,
c = oo.
Alonso also investigated properties of solutions of the corresponding inhomogeneous equation in the case n = 1 . By analogy with linear ordinary differential equations with constant coefficients, Campos [9] presented a method for solving simple equations of the form (42.34) with fractional derivatives in a complex plane given in § 22.1, in terms of the roots of the characteristic peeudopolynomial
L: a; r a; j=l n
= 0.
42.9. Equations of the form (42.34) with piecewise constant coefficients were investigated by Kochura and Didenko [1]. 42.10. The abstract Cauchy problem for the equation of bypergeometric type
II (
II (
)
)
p d 9 d t d + fJ; - 1 u(t) - At t dt t dd + a; u(t) = 0, t > 0, t t j=l j=l with the closed linear operator A and constant coefficients aj and fJ; was considered by Bragg [1 , 2]. By using fractional integrals he obtained the expressions connecting the solutions of this equation for different values of parameters and applied these expressions to investigating the Cauchy problem for the degenerate equation of hyperbolic type
uu - tm u%% + vtml 2- 1 u% = 0, t > 0, m � 2, u(z,O) = cp(x) , u , (z , O) = cp( z) . 42.1 1. Yu. Rabinovich and Nesterov [1] considered the differential operators Kn u: (43.6) where Pn (z) are polynomials of certain degrees. They found the conditions under which the order n of the operator in (43.6) can be lowered by using fractional derivatives defined in (22.30) and (22.331 ), and in the relation similar to the one in (22.331 ) in the case zo = oo. In the paper by Nesterov [1] such derivatives were applied to constructing solutions of differential equations of the Fuchs type with • singular points
•
where Qm (z)
•
o
is a polynomial of degree m .
42.12. A series of papers is concerned with the application of methods of fractional integro.differentiation to solving linear differential equations of second order of the form ( 43.6) with polynomial coefficients. Al-Bassam [2, 3, 5, 7, 9-12, 14-15], Al-Bassam and Kalla [1] considered differential and integro.difl'erential equations reduced by the Leibniz rule given in (17.11), and other properties of
§ 43. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER 8
869
fractional integrals and derivatives to operator equations of compositional type (43.7)
where
p(x) q(x) and
m
n (ak
are products of the form
+
b x)<XJc ei-'Z . Necessary and sufficient
k = l conditions under which certain classes of differential equations of second order are equivalent to
{ (
k
43. 7) were proved, and their solutions were constructed. Examples of the equations for Gauss, Hermite, Kummer, Laguerre, Legendre and Jacobi functions, for the generalized hypergeometric functions and aF , and for orthogonal polynomials were considered. On the basis of 43. 7) solutions of these equations are represented via the corresponding fractional integrals and their compositions - § 9.3 and § 10. In this connection see also the paper by Al-Bassam 1 3 where equations with solutions including generalized power series and, in particular, analogues of exponential, trigonometric and hyperbolic functions were considered. Higgins suggested an original method for obtaining general solutions of the inhomoge neous hypergeometric equations. This method is based on the application of direct and inverse Laplace transforms given in {1.119) and {1.120) , and Erdelyi-Kober transforms defined in 18.1 ), {18.2) with respect to parametel'S. Nishimoto 7)- 1 3 , and also his papel'S published in J. Coli. Engng. Nihon Univ. 1988. given in § 43.2, note B-29, 1989. B-30, applied the fractional integro-differentiation operators 42.3 to studying special solutions of ordinary and partial differential equations of the Fuchs type connected with Gauss, Kummer; Laguerre , Legendre, etc. special functions. In this connection we refer also to Nishimoto and Kalla [1, 2 and Nishimoto and Tu Shih-Tong [1, 2]. 42.13. Fedosov and Yanenko proved that the equation in partial derivatives of half-integer order
2F2
2
[]
[6]
{
[ []
f11
[1]
]
a k - const , - § 24.2 - can be investigated by means of representating their operators as compositions of invertible operators of the form v where + a;v
¥,!
¥,�
n
z
1)+1/'!u(x, y) = y�1f .!!._dx j {x -t)-1.2u(t, y)dt n= = a1 = u(x, y) =1f-l/2 J J (6-e) 112 :e [J(e, y + at2 {x - 6)} - atf(s, y + at2 {x - 6) + e- s)]ded6 + { o,q(y + at2x), at � o, q(t) n= 42.14. [ 1 ] F; , j = D2 , F Fv = FD2 v
and ao
-co
Otj
0,
are the roots of a certain characteristic polynomial. In particular, in the case 1 the relation for the general solution of this equation z
-
oo
'
-
oo
Ot
where
1,
0,
>
is an arbitrary function was indicated. The case
Yaroslavtseva constructed the operators operator P into i.e. the operators with the property P
2 was also considered in detail. 1 , 2, for transformation of the on the elements 11 of a
870
CHAPTER 8. APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
certain function space where
P
=
-
(
d2 d -- + 211ctg
In particular, the operator F1 has the fonn
F1 v =
!p
2''r(11 + 1 / 2 ) . (sm
I0
)
,
v(t)(cos t - cos
for real 11 > 0, and the fonn of a convolution of a test function for other values 11.
v
with the functional sin2 11 (
These results were applied to reducing the Cauchy problem for the differential equation
n
E ak pn -k u
=
0,
k=O
a k - const ,
0 <
1r,
to the Cauchy problem for the ordinary differential equation
n
E (- 1)n- k ak w2n-2k
=
0.
k=O
42.15. Biacino and Miserendino [2] considered properties of the operator Lu =
E aa (x)D a u,
la l�4
lal = a1 + a 2 ,
with fractional derivatives D a u defined in the papers by Biacino and Miserendino [1 , 3] - also § 29.2, note 24.10. On the basis of the representation
Lu =
E
l a le{2 ,3,4}
aa (x)D a u +
E aa (x)D a u
l a 1< 2
the conditions for the index Lu to be equal to zero were indicated, and the mapping properties of the operator L is Sobolev spaces were studied.
42.16. Sprinkhuizen-Kuyper [1] proved a series of theorems about the solution of the Cauchy problem for the equation
( -) I ( - -) 1 d -x dx
d2 II d +dx2 x dx
k /(x)
.
=
g(x),
with conditions of the form J(j ) (1) = 0, j = 0, 1 , . . , l + 2k - 1 . For g(x) E C{[O, 1 )] the above problem has the solution f( x) = I�k ,I g (x) where
§
43.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CHAPTER
8
871
Iff• >. f(x)
E
1]}.
in the space f (x) c 2k+ '{[O, Some properties of this operator with a Gauss hypergeometric function in the kernel were also studied in this paper. These results were developed by McBride 9 and Dimovski and Kiryakova who considered operators more general than (9.5). For such operators their integral representations in the fonn of compositions of the Erdelyi-Kober type fractional integro-differentiation operators . given in and and in terms of the Meyer G - function of the fonn were found. Special cases of these representations which lead to operators with a Gauss hypergeometric function of the fonn were earlier considered by Sprinkhuizen-Kuyper 42.1 T. Tremblay and Tremblay and Fugere investigated properties of the operators
[7, ]
{18.1) (18.2) (10.[21]8)
where D = S = 0 or S relations
1; r, n, rjE (j 1,2,
{3, aj C(j = . . . , m) , nonnegative integers. In particular, the operator
fz, nr, a C, is the fractional derivative given in =
[1].
[1]
=
. . . , m)
{22.4); E
1,2,
{zD + aj - {38n + f3i )r; z68,8n D�l -6 )( 1 -8),8n , II II i
n-1 X
are
[2] {10.48),
m
=l i=l
where 8 = 0 or 8 = were obtained together with the representation for D�;�;�.� r�'01 "' in terms of the operators z ( 1 - 2"l' )w +( l -"Y) k n k z(2"Y- l )w +"l' k where 'Y = or 'Y = w C, k= . . . , n( rt + · · · + rm). A s examples the new operator relations for the usual differential operators D and integral operators n; 1 were given.
1
0, 1,
0
1, E
BIBLIOGR APHY Abdullaev, S.K. 1) (1985} Some classes of integral operators in spaces of integrable functions (Russian). Doil. Ahd. Na.d SSSR, 283, no 4, 777-780. {Trans. in Soviet Math. Dold. 32 {1985), no 1, 171-174}.
Abel, N.H. 1) {1881) Solution de quelques problemes a l'aide d'integrales definies. In Ge•a.mmelte ma.thema.ti•che Werie. Leipzig: Teubner, 1, 11-27. (First publ. in Mag. Naturvidenbbeme, Aurgang, 1, no 2, Christiania, 1823). 2) {1826) AuftOsung einer mechanischen Aufgabe. J. fiir reine und angew. Math., 1 , 153-157.
Adamchik, V.S. and Marichev, 0.1. 1) {1990) The algorithm for calculating integrals of hypergeometric type functions and its realization in REDUCE system. In Proc. Intern. SJmp. SJmbolic a.nd A lgebraic Comptda.tion (ISSAC-90) , (Tokyo, 1990}, ACM Press, 212-224.
D.R. 1) {1975) A note on Riesz potentials. Duke Ma.tla.. J., 42, no 4, 765-778. Adams, D.R. and Bagby, R.J . 1) {1974) Translation-dilation invariant estimates for Riesz
Adams,
potentials. Indiana. Univ. Ma.th. J., 23, no 11, 1051-1067.
Adams,
R., Aronszajn,
Agarwal,
N. and Smith, K.T. 1) (1967) Theory of Bessel potentials, II. Ann. ln•t. Fourier, Grenoble, 17, no 2, 1-135.
R.P. 1) {1953} A propos d'une note de M. Pierre Humbert.
C. r. •ea.nce• Aca.d. Sci.,
236, no 21, 2031-2032.
2) {1969) Certain fractional q-integrals and · q-derivatives. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. , 66, no 2, 385-370. 3} {1976) Fractional q-derivatives and q-integrals and certain hypergeometric transforma tions. Ga.nita., 27, no 1-2, 25-32. Ahern, P. and Jevtic, M. 1) {1984) Mean modulus and the fractional derivative of an inner function. Comple� Variable•, Theor, Appl., 3, no 4, 431-445. Ahiezer, N.I. 1) (1954) On some dual integral equations (Russian). Dokl. Aka.d. Na.uk SSSR, 98, no 3, 333-336. 2) {1957) To the theory of dual integral equations (Russian). Ucla. ebn. zap. Khar'kov. Univ., Ser. 4, 80{25), 5-31 . Ahiezer, N.I. and Shcherbina, V.A. 1) {1957) About inversion of some singular integrals (Russian). Ibid., 191-198.
874
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ahmad, M.I. 1) {1971) Quadruple integral equations and operators of fractional integration. Gla•gow Math. J., 12, no 1 , 60-64 . Ahner, J.F. and Lowndes, J.S. 1) {1964) On the solution of a class of integral equations. J. Math. A nal. and A ppl., 100, no 2, 447-462. Ahuja, G. 1) {1981) On fractional integration for generalized functions. J. Ma•lana Azad Coli. Tech., 14, 79-85. Akopyan, S.A. 1) {1960) Integral transforms connected with differential operators of infinite order (Ruaaian). IztJ. Akad. Nad A rmran. SSR, Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nad, 13, no 1 , 3-27. Akopyan, S.A. and Nersesyan, A.B. 1) (1956) Some integro-differential operators and expansions in series analogous to Sohlomilch series (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nad A rmran. SSR, 27, no 4, 201-207. Al-Abedeen, A.Z. 1) {1976) Existence theorem on differential equations of generalized order. Rafidain J. Sci. Monl. Univ. Iraq, 1, 95-104. Al-Abedeen, A.Z. and Arora, H.L. 1) {1978) A global existence and uniq\tenesa theorem for ordinary differential equations of generalized order. Canad. Math. Btdl., 21, no 3, 267-271 . Al-Amiri, H.S. 1) {1965) Prestarlike functions of order a and type {3 with negative coefficients. A nn. UMCS, Sect. A, 39, 1-1 1. Al-Busam, M.A. 1) (1961) Some properties of Holmgren-Riesz transform. Ann. Sc•ola Norm. S•p. Pi•a, Ser. 3, •ci. fi•· e mat., 15, fa•c. 1-2, 1-24. 2) {1962) Concerning Holmgren-Riesz transform equations of Gauss-Riemann type. Rend. Circolo Mat. Palermo. Ser. 2, 1 1, no 1 1 , 47-66 . 3) {1964) On certain types of Holmgren-Riesz transform equations and their equivalent differential equations. J. fir reine •nd angew. Math., 216, no 1-2, 91-100. 4) (1965) Some existence theorems on differential equations of generalized order. 16id.,
218, 70-78. 5} (1966)
On
an integro-differential equation of Legendre-Volterra type. Port• gal. Math.,
26, no 1-2, 53-61.
6) (1967) On Laplace's second order linear differential equations and their equivalent Holmgren-Riesz transform equations. J. fir reine •nd angetli. Math., 225, 76--84. 7) (1976) On some differential and integro-differential equations associated with Jacobi's differential equation. J. fir rei•e •nd angew. Math., 288, 211-217. 8) (1982) On fractional calculus and its applications to the theory of ordinary differential equations of generalized order. In Nonlir&ear Analy•i• and A ppl. (New Foundland, Canada, 1961) , eds. S P.Singh, J.H.Burry, in Lect. Note• in P•re and Appl. Math., Dekker, New York, Basel, 80, 305--331. 9) (1985) Some applications of fractional calculus to differential equations. In Fractional Calc•l••, eds. A.C.McBride, G.F.Roach. Boston: Pitman Adv. Publ. Progr., Ru. Note• Math., 138, 1-11. 10) (1985) Application of fractional calculus to differential equations of Hermite's type. Indian J. P•re ar&d Appl. Math., 16, no 9, 1009-1916. 11) {1986) On fractional analysis and its applications. In Modern A nalrn• and it. Appl., ed. H.L.Manocha. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Ltd., 269-307. 12) {1988) Some applications of generalized calculus to differential and integro-differential equations. In Proc. Ir&tern. Con/. Math. A r&al. and it• A ppl. (Kuwait, 1935), Oxford: Pergamon Press , 61-76. 13) (1989) A unified class of differential equations. Math. Japan., 34, no 4, 513-533. 14} {1987) On generalized power series and generalized operational calculus and its application. In Nonlinear A nalr•i•, ed. Th.M. Rassias. Singapore: World Sci. Publ. Co., 51-88.
BffiLIOGRAPHY
875
15) (1990) Applications of fractional calculus to a class of integro-differential equations of Riemann-Papperitz-Gauss type. In Proc. lnterft. Conf. Fractional Calc,al•• and it. A ppl. (Tokyo, 1989), ed. K. Nishimoto. Tokyo: Coli. Engin. Nihon Univ., 1-1 1 . Al-Bassam, M .A. and Kalla, S.L. 1 ) (1989) O n orthogonal polyno�a1s associated with differential equations of Laguerre type. Senlica B•lg. mat/a. pdl., 15, 217-222. Alekseevskii, V.P. 1) (1884) On integration of the equation �y/dz" + (a/z)� - 1 y/dz" - 1 + {3y = 0 (Russian). Soob•laclaen. Klaar'ltotJ. mat. ohlaclautva, v,. 1, 41-64. Aleroev, T.S. 1) (1982) The Sturm-Liouville problem for a second-order differential equation with fractional derivatives in the lower terms (Russi an). Differenuial'nJe UravneniJa, 18, no 2, 341-342. 2) (1984) Spectral analysis of a class of non-selfadjoint operators (Russian). 16id., 20, no 1, 171-172
Alexitz, G. and Kralik, D. 1) (1960) Uber Approximationen mit den arithmetiachen Mitteln allgemeiner Orthogonalreihen. Acta Mat/a. A cad. Sci. H•ng., 1 1 , no 3-4, 387-399. Alimov, S.A. 1) (1972) Fractional powers of elliptic operators and isomorphism of classes of differentiable functions (Russian). Differenbial'nJe UravneniJa, 8, no 9, 1609-1626. Alonso, J. 1) (1964) On differential equations of fractional order. Dr Di••., Univ. Cincinnati, 70 p. In Di••· A b•tr•. 1985, 26, no 4, Pos. 2231 . Order no 64-1 1, 947. AI-Salam, W.A. 1) (1966) Some fractional q-integrals and q-derivatives. Proc. Edinburg/a Mat/a. Soc., 15, no 2, 135-140. 2) (1966) q-Analogues of Cauchy's formulas. Proc. Amer. Mat/a. Soc., 17, no 3, 616-621 . AI-Salam, W.A. and Verma, A. 1) (1965) Remarks on fractional q-integrals. B•ll. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liege, 44, no 9-10, 60()--6()7. 2) (1975) A fractional Leibniz q-formula. Pacif. J. Mat/a., 60, no 2, 1-9.
Amvrosova, 0.1. 1) (1984) The theorems of equiconvergence for the differential operators with power singularities in the boundary conditions (Russian). In Differ. eq•at. and tlaeory f•nction•, Saratov: lzdat. Saratov. univ., 13-19.
Andersen, K.F. 1) (1982) On the range and inversion of fractional integrals in weighted spaces. Proc. RoJ. Soc. Edinb•rgla, A 92, no 1-2, 51-64. 2) (1965) Weighted inequalities for fractional integrals. In Fractional Calc•l••, eds. A.C.McBride, G.F.Roach. Boston: Pitman Adv. Publ. Progr., Ru. Note. Mat/a., 138, 12-25. Andersen, K.F. and Heinig, H.P. 1) (1983) Weighted norm inequalities for certain integral operators. SIAM J. Mat/a. A nal., 14, no 4, 834-844. Andersen, K.F. and Sawyer, E.T. 1) (1968) Weighted norm inequalities for the Riemann Liouville and Weyl fractional integral operators. Tran•. Amer. Mat/a. Soc., 3 0 8 , no 2, 547-558. Andreev, A.A., Volkodavov, V.P. and Shevchenko, G.N. 1) (1974) On Riemann function (Russian). In Different.ial'nJe UravneniJa: 7hidJ Mat. Kafedr Ped. ln•t. RSFSR, Ryazan', 4, 25-31.
Ang, D.D., Gorenflo, R. and Hai, D.D. 1) (1990) Regularization of a generalized Abel integral equation. Facla6er. Mat/a., Ser. A, Freie Univ. Berlin, Preprint Nr A-90-8. Arestov, V.V. 1) (1979) Inequalities for fractional derivatives on the half-line. Approrim. Tlaeory, Banaei& Center Publ., PWN-Poli•la Sci. Pdl., Warsaw, 4, 19-34. Aronszajn, N. 1) (1965) Potentiels besseliens. Ann. ln•t. Fourier, Grenoble, 15, no 1 , 43-56. Aronszajn, N., Mulla, F. and Szeptycki, P. 1) (1963) On spaces of potentials connected with Lp classes . 16id., 13, no 2, 211-306.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
876
Aronszajn, N. and Smith, K.T. 1) (1961) Theory of Bessel potentials, I. 16id., 11, 365-475 Arora, A.K. and Koul, C.L. 1) (1987) Applications of fractional calculus. Indian J. P-are and A ppl. Math., 18, no 10, 931-937. Arora, H.L. and Alshamani, J .G. 1) (1980) Stability of dift"erential equation of non-integer order through fixed point in the large. Indian J. Pt�.re and Appl. Math., 11, no 3, 307-313. Arutyunyan, N.H. 1) (1959) The plane contact problem in the theory of plasticity with a power strengthening of the material (Russian). Izv. Ahd. Na•i Armran. SSR, Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Na•i, 12, no 2, 77-105. 2) (1959) The plane contact problem in the theory of creep (Russian) . Priil. mat. i meA., 23, no 5, 901-924. Arutyunyan, N.H. and Manukyan, M.M. 1) (1963) The contact problem in the theory of creep with frictional forces taken into account (Russian). 16id., 27, no 5, 613-620. Askey, R. 1) (1975) Inequalities via fractional integration. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Fractional Calc•l•• and iu Appl. (New Haven, 1974), ed. B.Rou, Lect. Motu Math., 457, 106-115. Asral, B. 1) (1981) On the regular Cauchy problema for the Euler-Poiuon-Darboux eqUations and the method of ascent. Bt�.ll. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. RSR, 25, no 2, 121-128. Atiyah, M.F. 1) (1970) Resolution of aingu]aritiea and division of distributions. Comm. P•re aad Appl. Math., 23, no 2, 145-150. Atkinson, F.V. 1) (1951} The normal solvability of linear equations in normed spaces (Russi an). Mat. 56. (N.S.), 28(70), no 1, 3-14.
Atkinson, K.E. 1} (1974) An existence theorem for Abel integal equations. SIAM J. Math. A nal., 5, no 5, 729-736. 2) {1974) The numerical solution of an Abel integral equation by a product trapezoidal method. SIAM J. N•mer. A aal., 11, no 1 , 97-101.
K.I. 1) {1951) On the theory of mixed type equations (Russian) . Dr. Di... , Moscow, 196 p. 2) {1985) The maximum principle for the Euler-Tricomi equation (Russian). Dold. Alad. Na•i SSSR, 285, no 4, 777-782. {Transl. in Soviet Matl. Doll. 32 {1985), no 3, 752-756}.
Babenko,
Babenko V .F. 1) {1983) The diameten of certain clasees of convolutio:na (Russian). Ulrain. Mat. Z., 35, no 5, 603--«)7. Babenko,
Yu.I. 1) {1986) Heat and ma.. tran•fer. The method of calct�.lation for tle A eat and diJJ•.Soa flow• (Russian). Moscow: Himiya, 144 p.
Babich, V.M., Kapilevich, M.B., Mihlln, S.G., Natanson, G.J. and others 1) {1964) TAe linear et•ation• of matlematical pl&r•ic• (Russian) . Ed. S.G.Mihlin. Moscow: Nauka, 366 p. Babloyan,
A.A. 1) {1964) The solution of certain dual integral equations {Russian). Prill. mat. i mel., 28, no 6, 1015-1023.
A.A. 1) {1977) On the question of generalizations of Taylor's fonnula (Russian). Doil. Ahtl. Na•l SSSR, 232, no 2, 265-266. {Tranal. in Soviet Matl. Doil. 18, {1977), no 1 , 45-48}.
Badalyan,
Bagby R.J. 1) {1971) Lebesgue spaces of parabolic potentials. RlinoS. J. Math., 15, no 4, 61G-634. 2) {1974) Parabolic potentials with support on a half-spaoe. 16id., 18, no 2, 219-222.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
877
3) (1980) A characterization of Riesz potentials and an inversion fonnula. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 29, no 4, 581-595. Bagley, R.L. 1) (1990) On the fractional order initial value problem and its engineering applications. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Fractional Calcul•• and ita Appl. (Tokyo, 1989), ed. K. Nishimoto. Tokyo: Coli. Engin. Nihon Univ., 12-20. Bagley, R.L. and Torvik, P.J. 1) (1986) On the fractional calculus model of viscoelastic behaviour. J. Rheol., 30, no 1, 133-155. Bakaev, N.Yu. and Tarasov, R.P. 1) (1978) Semigroups and a method for the stable solution of the Abel equation (Russian). Si6ir1k. Mat. J., 19, no 1 , 3-9. {Transl. in Siberian Math. J. 19 (1978), no 1, 1-5}. Baker, B.B and Copson, E.T. 1) (1950) The mathematical theorJ of Hu·rgen• ' principle. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 192 p. Bakievich, M.I. 1) (1963) Singular Tricomi problems for equation 71a uee - u,, - � 2 71a u = 0 (Russian). Volzh. Mat. Sh., Kuibyshev: Ped. Inst., no 1, 42-52. Balakrishnan, A.V. 1) (1958) Representation of abstract Riesz potentials of the elliptic type. B•ll. Amer. Math. Soc., 64:, no 5, 266-289. 2) (1959) Operational calculus for infinitesimal generators of semi-groups. Tran1. A mer. Math. Soc., 91, no 2, 330-353. 3) (1960) Fractional powers of closed operators and the semi-groups generated by them. Pacif. J. Math., 1 0 , no 2, 419-437. Balasubramanian R., Norrie, D.H. and Vries, G. de 1) (1979) The application of the least squares finite element method to Abel's integral equation. Intern. J. Nume. Method• in Eng., 14:, 201-209. Bang, T. 1) (1941) Une inegalite de Kolmogoroff et les fonctions presque-p&iodiques. Det. Kgl. Danike Vig. Seldd. Math.-FJ•· Medd. Kobenhavn, 19, no 4, 1-26. Bari, N.K. 1) (1961) Trigonometrical aerie• (Russian). Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 935 p. Bari, N.K. and Stechkin, S.B. 1) (1956) The best approximations and differential properties of two conjugate functions (Russian). 7rudJ Mod:ov. Mat. obahch., 5, 483-522. Barrett, J.H. 1) (1954) Differential equations of non-integer order. Cana.d. J. Math., 6, no 4, 529-541 Bavinck, H. 1) (1972) A special class of Jacobi series and some applications. J. Math. A nal. and Appl., 37, no 2, 767-797. Beatroux, F. and Burbea, J. 1) (1989) Holomorphic Sobolev spaces on the Warsaw: Polska Abd. Nauk, 276, 57 p.
ball.
Di... Math.
Beekmann, W. 1) (1967) Perfekte lntegralverlahren. Dr. Diaa., Eberhard-Karls-Univ., Tiibingen, 65 p. 2) (1968) Perfecte lntegralverfahren. Math. Z., 104, 99-105. Belinskii, E.S. and Belyi, V.I. 1) (1971) Integral representations with associated kernels and generalized integro-differential operators (Russian). In Metric queation• of the theory of /'�&nction• and mapping,, no 2. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 21-36. Belonosov, S.M. 1) (1961) On a method of solving the plane static problems of the theory of elasticity for two-connected domains (Russian). Sibirak. Mat. J., 2, no 3, 341-365. 2) (1962) The principal plane atatic problema of the theorJ of ela•ticity for one- a.nd two-connected domain• (Russian). Novosibirsk: lzdat. Sibirsk. Otdel. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 231 p.
878
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1) (1881)2, 461-505. Rend. Accad. &ci. di .A. 1) (1972) Z. angew. Math. und Phy&., 23, 6, 901-917. 1) (1965) ) Dop. Akad. Nauk Ukrain. RSR, 2, 167-170. 2) (1965) Ukrain. Mat. Z., 17, 1, 3-17 and 2, 3-16. 3) (1967) Ibid., 19, 2, 104-109. 4) (1967) Dop. Akad. Nauk Ukrain. RSR, Ser. A, 11, 994-997. 5) (1969) lzv. Akad. Nauk Armyan. SSR, Ser. Mat., 5, 364-393. 6) (1977) Ibid.� 12, 2, 147-156. I) (1968) lzv. Vyuh. Uchehn. Zaved. Mat., 10, 3-12. A. Lp Duke Math. 28, 3, 302-324. R. 1) (1961) 1) Bull. (1968)Amer. Math. Soc., 74, 1, 191-196. 1) (1968) Math. Nachr., 38, 1-2, 115-129. 2) (1968) Acta &ci. math., 29, 1-2, 93-106. R.A. 1) (1975) SIAM Math. Anal., 5, 766-773. 1) 1,(1969) Funkt•ional. Anal. i Pril., 3, 84-85. S.M. 1) (1975) Integral repre&entation• of function• and embedding theorem• 480 1) U&pehi (1964) Mat. Nauk, 19, 4, 163-170. Lp M.A. 1) (1982) 15.1 0.62, 5166, 12 2) (1984) lzv. Vy&&h. Uche6n. Zaved. Mat., 3, 63-65. Soviet Math. IZ11 . VUZ), (1984), 3, 83--87}. 1) A(1965) mer. Math. Month., 72, 4, 393-397. M. 1)2, 259-267. (1987) lndit.&n Mt.&th.,
Beltrami, E.
Sulla teoria delle fWlZioni potenziali synunetriche.
Bologna,
Belward , J Solutions of some Fredholm integral equations using fractional integration, with an application to a forced convection problem. no
Belyi, V.I. Some properties of fractional derivatives in a complex domain and their application to the theory of approximation of functions (Ukrain. . no Questions of the approximation of functions of certain classes in a complex domain, I and II (Russian) . no no On the question of best linear approximation methods of functions analytic in the unit disc (Russian). no The approximation of funtions with continuous fractional derivative (Ukrainian) . no The approximation of quasismooth functions of a complex variable (Russian). 4:, no On the question of integral representations of functions regular in a circular annulus (Russian). no
Belyi, V.I. and Volkov, Yu.I. Some applications of integra-differential operators of arbitrary order in the theory of approximation of functions (Russian). no Benedek,
and Panzone,
The spaces
with mixed norm.
J.,
no
Berens, H., Butzer, P.L. and Westphal, U. infinitesimal generators of semigroups.
Representations of fractional powers of no
Berens, H. and Westphal, U. Zur Charakterisierung von Ableitungen nichtganzer Ordnung im Rahmen der Laplace-Transformation. no A Cauchy problem for a generalized wave equation. no Berger, N. and Handelsman-, operators with applications.
J.
Asymptotic evaluation of fractional integral 6, no Meromorphy of the function p>. (Russian).
Bernshtein, I.N. and Gel'fand, S.I.
no
Besov, O.V., D'in, V.P. and Nikol'skii, (Russian) . Moscow: Nauka, Bessonov, Yu.L. (Russian).
p.
On the existence of mixed derivatives of fractional order in no
Betilgiriev, On the asymptotic behaviour of the Wiener-Hop£ integral equation in the case of fractional zeros of symbol (Russian), Rostov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI no p. Asymptotic behavior of the solution of the Wiener-Hop{ equation in the case of fractional zeros of the symbol (Russian). no {Transl. in ( 28 no Bharatiya, P.L. function. Bhatt, S.
The inversion of a convolution transform whose kernel is a Bessel no
and Kishore, N. J. 9, no
Absolute Norlund summability of a Fourier series.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
879
Bhise, V.M. 1 ) ( 1959) Inversion fonnula for a generalized Laplace integral. J. Viir11m Univ. lndi11, 1 1 , no 3, 57--63. 2) ( 1964) Operators of fractional integration and a generalised Hankel transform. Collect. M11th., 1 6, no 2-3, 201-209.
Bhise, V.M. and Madhavi Dinge 1 ) ( 1980) On composition of integral operators with Fourier type kernels. lndi11n J. Pure 11nd Appl. Mdh., 11, no 9, 1 183-1187.
Bhonsle, B.R. 1 ) ( 1966) Inversion integrals for the Legendre transfonnation and the birth rate of a population. Gt�nit11, 17, 69-95. 2 ) ( 1966 ) Inversions of some integral equatioDB. Proc. N11t. Ac11d. Sci. lndi11, A 36 , no 4, 1003--1006.
Biacino, L. 1 ) ( 1983) Teoremi di immersione per le derivate parziali di online frazionario delle funzioni di wr (0). Boll. unione milt. ital., 2-C, no 1, 1-40. 2 ) (1984) Soluzioni negli spazi de Lebesgue della equazione integrale di Abel. Ric. mat., 33, no 2, 267-287.
Biacino, L., Di Giorgio, M. and Miserendino, D. 1 ) ( 1982 ) Derivate di ordine frazionario per funzioni di wr (o). Boll. unione mat. ital. Anllli.ti f'•mziont�le e Appl., Ser. 6, 1-C, no 1, 235-278.
Biacino, L . and Miserendino, D. 1 ) ( 1979) Derivate di online frazionario per funzioni di £2 (R2 ) e caratterizzazione degli spazi H•(R2 ). Le Matemlltiche, Catani11, 34, no 1-2, 143-165. 2 ) ( 1979) Perturbazioni di operatori ellittici mediante operatori contenenti derivate di ordine frazionario. Ibid., 34, no 1-2, 166-167. 3) (1979-1980) Le derivate di ordine fraziona.rio e gli spazi wr (0). Rend. Accad. •ci. fi•., mat., Napoli, Ser. 4, 46, no 1 18, 189-220.
Bitsadze, A.V. 1 ) ( 1953) On the problem of equatioDB of mixed type (Russian). In Itogi Naul:i: Trsdr Milt. ln•t. Stdlov. Moscow: Izdat. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 41, 60 p. 2 ) (1959) EquatioDB of mixed type (Russi an). In ltogi N11di, vyp. 2. Moscow: Izdat. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 164 p. 3) ( 1961 ) Some cla••e• of the partial differential equation• (Russian). Moscow: Naulca, 448 p.
Bleistein, N. 1 ) ( 1977) Asymptotic expansions of integral transforms of functioDB with logarithmic singularities. SIAM J. Math. An11l., 8, no 4, 65�72. Blum, E.K. 1 ) ( 1954 ) The Euler-Poi88011-Darboux equation in the exceptional cases. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 5, no 4, 511-520.
Blumenthal, L.M. 1 ) ( 1931 ) Note on fractional operators and the theory of composition. A mer. J. Math., 53, 483-492.
Bocher, M. 1 ) ( 1909) An introduction to the study of integral equations. In Tr�� cb in Math. 11nd Mllth. Ph,•. , no 10. Cambridge Univ. PreM, 8-9.
Bochner, S. 1 ) ( 1962) Lecture• on Fov.rier integral• (Russi an). Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 380 p. (English ed. in Princeton Univ. Press , 1959) .
Bogatyrev, S.V. 1 ) ( 1980-1981 ) A theorem of equiconvergence for a boundary value problem (Russian). In Diff. equat. and theorr of function•, Saratov: Izdat . Saratov. Univ., vyp. 2, 22-41 . Boman, J. 1 ) ( 1978) Equivalence of generalized moduli of continuity. Stockholm• Univ. Math. ln.t. (Metltl.), no 1, 1-54.
Boman, J. and Shapiro, H.S. 1 ) ( 1971 ) Comparison theorems for a generalized modulus of continuity. Ariiv fir Mat., 9, no 1 , 91-116.
880
BffiLIOGRAPHY
Bora, S.L. and Saxena, R.K. 1) (1971) On fractional integration. Pt&bl•. in•t. math. Beograd, 1 1 , no 25, 19--22. Borodachev, N.M. 1) (1976) On a particular class of solutions of triple integral equations (Russian). Prill. mat. i meA., 4:0, no 4, 655--661. {Transl. in J. Appl. Math. Mech., 1976, 4:0, no 4, 605-61 1}.
Bosanquet, L.S. 1) (1931) On Abel's integral equation and fractional integrals. Proc. London Math. Soc., Ser. 2, 32, 134-143. 2) {1934) The absolute summability (A) of Fourier series. Proc. Edinh.rgh Math. Soc., Ser. 2, 4:, 12-17. 2a) {1936) The absolute Cesaro summability of a Fourier series. Proc. London Math. Soc., Ser. 2, 4:1, 517-526. 3) {1941) A mean value theorem. J. London Math. Soc., 16, no 1-4, 146-148. 4) (1943) Note on convexity theorems. 16id., 18 , 239--246. 5) {1945) Some properties of Ces&ro-Lebesgue integrals. Proc. London Math. Soc., Ser. 2, 4:9, 4()-62. 6) (1958-1959) On the order of magnitude of fractional differences. Calc11.tta Math. Soc. Golden Jdilee Memor. Vol., 1 , 161-172. 7) {1967) Some extensions of M. Riesz's mean value theorem. Indian J. Math., 9, no 1 , 65-90. 8) (1969) On Liouville's extension of Abel's integral equation. Mathematika, 16, no 1, 59--85. Bosanquet, L.S. and Linfoot, E.H. 1) (1931) Generalized means and the summability of Fourier series. Q•art. J. Math. Ozford •er., 8, no 5-8, 207-229. Bouwkamp, C.J . 1) (1978) On some Bessel-function integral equations. Ann. mat. p11.ra ed appl., 108, 63-67. Braaksma, B.L .J . 1) (1964) Asymptotic expansions and analytic continuations for a class of B arnes integrals. Compo•. Math., 15, no 3, 239--341. Braaksma, B.L.J. and Schuitman, A. 1) {1976) Some classes of Watson transforms and related integral equations for generalized functions. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 7, no 6, 771-796 Bragg, L.R. 1) {1969) Hypergeometric operator series and related partial differential equations. 1Nn•. Amer. Math. Soc., 14:3, no 1, 319--336 2) {1976) The Riemann-Liouville integral and pal"&meter shifting in a class of linear abstract Cauchy problems. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 1, no 1, 1-12.
Brakhage, H., Nickel, K. and Rieder, P. 1) (1985) Auft&ung der Abelschen Integralgleichung. 2 Art. Z. angew. Math. •nd Phr•., 16, no 2, 295-298.
Bredimas, A. 1) (1973) L'operateur de differentiation d'ordre complexe. Btdl. •ci. math., Ser. 2, 97, no 1, 17-28. 2) {1976) La differentiation d'ordre complexe, le produit de convolution generalize et le produit canonique pour les distributions. 0. R. Acad. •ci. Pam, 282, no 1, A37-A40. 3) (1976) Extensions, proprietes complementaires et applications des operateUJ'S de differentiation a gauche et a droite d'ordre complexe. 16id., 283, no 1, A3-A6. 4) {1976) Applications a certaines equations difl'erentielles des premier et second ordre a coefficients polynomiaux des operateUI'B de differentiation d'ordre complexe a gauche et a droite. 16id., 283, no 6, A337-A340. 5) {1976) La differentiation d'ordre complexe et lea produits canonique et de convolution generalise: complements. 16id., 283, no 16, A1095-A1096. 6) {1977) The complex order differentiation operator and the "spherical" Liouville-Radon transform in «' , n � 2. J. math. p11.re. et appl., 56, no 4, 479--4 91.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
881
Brenke, W.C. 1) (1922) An application of Abel's integral equation. Amer. Mat/&. Monti&., 29, 58--00. Bresters, D.W. 1) (1968) On distributions connected with quadratic forms. SIAM J. A ppl. Matl&., 16, no 3, 563-581. 2) (1973) On the Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation. SIAM J. Mat/&. A nal., -'• no 1, 31-41. 3) (1978) On a generalized Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation. 16itl., 9, DO 5, 924-934. Brodskii, A.L. 1) (1976) Some imbedding theorems for a certain class of singular fractional differential operaton (Russian). Dokl. Ahtl. Nad SSSR, 227, DO 6, 1265-1266. {Trans. in Soviet Mat/&. Doll. 17 (1978), no 2, 591-595} . 2) (1977) On some imbedding theorems for a class of singular fractional-differential operators (Russian). Different.ial'nre Uravnenira, 13, no 9, 1637-1647. {Trans. in Diff. Equat. 1� (1977), DO 9, 1140-1147 (1978)}. Brunner, H. 1) (1973) The numerical solution of a class of Abel integral equations by piecewise polynomials. J. Comput. Pl&r•., 12, 412-416. Brychkov, Yu.A. 1) (1982) On the theory of spaces with a dominating mixed derivative (Russian). Mat. Zametli, 31, no 5, 678-694. {Trans. in Mat/&. Note• 31 (1982), no 5-6, 345-354}. 2) (1990) On smoothness of generalized functions. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Fractional Calc•l•• t�nd it. Appl. (Tokyo, 1989), ed. K. Nishimoto. Tokyo: Coli. Engin. Nihon Univ., 21-24. Brychkov, Yu.A., Glaeske, H.-J. and Marichev, 0.1. 1) (1983) Factorization of integral transfonnations of convolution type (Russian). In Mathematictd analy•i•. Itogi Nauki i Tell&nili. Moscow: Abd. Na� SSSR. Vsesoyuz. lnst. Nauchn. i Tekhn. Informatsii (VINITI), 21 , 3-41 . 2) (1986) Die Produktstruktur einer Klasse von lntegraltransformationen. Z. Anal. A nwentlungen, 5, no 2, 119-123.
Brychkov, Yu.A., Marichev, 0.1. and Yakubovich, S.B. 1) (1986) Integral Appell Fa transfonnation with respect to parameten. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Complez A nalr•i• antl Appl.'85. (Varna, 1985). Sofia: Publ. House Bulg. Acad. Sci., 135-140. Bugrov, Ya.S. 1) (1985) Fractional difference operators and classes of functions (Russian). Tr'KtlJ Mat. In•t. Stdlov, 172, 60-70. 2) (1986) Linear methods of summability of Fourier series and fractional difference operators (Russian). 16itl., 173 , 32-37. Bukhgeim, A.L. 1) (1981) Carleman estimates for Volterra operators and the uniqueness of inverse problems (Russian). In Noncla••ical problem• of mathematical pl&y•ic•. Novosibirsk: Abd. Nauk SSSR, Sibirsk. Otdel., Vychisl. Tsentr, 5EH>4. 2) (1983) Volterra eq•ation• antl inver•e problem• (Russian). Novosibirsk: Nauka, Sibirsk. Otdel., 208 p. Bureau, F.J . 1) (1955) Divergent integrals and partial differential equations. Comm. P•re and A ppl. Matl&., 8, no 1 , 143-202. 2) (1960) Problems and methods in partial differential equations. Ann. mat. pura etl appl., 51, 225-299. 3) (1961) Problems and methods in partial differential equations. 16id., 55, 323-366. Burenkov, V.I. and Sobnak, Sh.D. 1) (1985 ) Equivalent norms in Nilrol'skii-Besov spaces containing differences of fractional order (Russian). In Bo•ndarr value problem• of mathematical pl&r•ic• and •ome problem• in the theory of function •pace•. Moscow: Univ. Druzhby Narodov, 9-20. Burkill, J.C. 1) (1936) Fractional orders of integrability. J. London Math. Soc., 1 1 , 220-226.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
882
Burlak, J. 1 ) (1962) A pair d dual integral equations occurring Edinhrgh Math. Soc., Ser. 2, 13, no 2, 179-187. Busbridge, I,W. 1 ) (1938) 115-129.
Dual integral equations.
in diffraction theory.
Proc. London Math. Soc., Ser. 2, 44,
Proc.
no 2,
Buschman , R.G. 1 ) ( 1962 ) An inversion integral for a Legendre transfonnation. A mer. Math. Month., 69, no 4, 266-289. 2 ) (1962) An inversion integral. Proc. A mer. Math. Soc., 13, no 5, 675-677. 3) (1963) An inversion integral for a general Legendre transformation. SIA M Rev., 5, no 3, 232-233. 4 ) ( 1964) Convolution equations with generaralized Laguerre polynomial kernels. Ibid., 6 , no 2, 166-167. 5 ) (1964 ) Fractional integration. Math. Japan., 9, 99-106.
and Srivastava, H.M. 1 ) ( 1975 ) Inversion fonnulas for the integral transfonnation with the H-function as kernel. Indian J. P•re and A ppl. Math., 6, no 6, 563-589. Butzer, P.L. and Berens, H. 1 ) (1967) Semigro•p• of operator• and approzimation. Die Grund. Math. Wiss., Bd. 145. New York: Springer, 321 p. Butzer, P.L., Dyckhoff, H., Gorlich, E. and Stens, R.L. 1 ) ( 1977) Best trigonometric approximation, fractional order derivatives and Lipschitz classes . Canad. J. Math.,
Buschman, R.G.
Butzer, P.L. and Neuel, R.J. 1 ) ( 1971 ) Fo-.rier Analr•i• and Approzimation. One-dimen•ional theor,. Basel: Birkhiuser, 553 p. 29, no 4, 761-793.
Vol.
1:
Butzer, P.L. and Stens, R.L. 1 ) ( 1976) Fractional Chebyshev operational calculus and best algebraic approximation. In Proc. Intern. Symp. A••tin. Approzimation Theorr, Vol. 2, (Texas, 1976) . Acad. Press, 315-319. 2 ) ( 1977) The operational properties of the Chebyshev transfonn, IT: Fractional derivatives. In The approzimation theorr of f•nction•. (Kaluga, 1975) , Moscow: Nauka, 49-61. 3) ( 1978) Chebyshev transfonn methods in the solution of the fundamental theorem of best algebraic approximation in the fractional case. In Proc. Conf. Fo•rier analr•i• and approzimation theorr (Budapest, 1976) , eds. G.Alexits, P.Thran. Amsterdam, 191-212.
and Trebels, W. 1 ) ( 1968) Hilbert transfonns, fractional integration and differentiation. B•ll. A mer. Math. Soc., 74, no 1, 106-110. 2 ) (1988) Hilberttran•formation, gebrochene Integration •nd Differentiation. Koln Opladen: Weatdeutscher Veri., 82 p. Butzer, P.L. and Westphal, U. 1 ) (1975 ) An access to fractional differentiation via fractional difference quotients. In Proc. Intern. Con/. Fractional Calc•l•• and it• Appl. (New Haven, 1974) , ed. B.Ross, Lect. Notu Math., 457, 116-145. Bykov, Ya.V. and Botashev, A.I. 1 ) ( 1965 ) The properties of Yu.N. Rabotnov's special functions and the inversion of integral operaton (Russian). In St•tlie• in integro tlifferential eq•ation• in Kirghizia, no 3. Frunze: llim, 3-22. Bzhikhatlov, H.G. 1 ) (1971 ) A boundary value problem for a certain degenerate hyperbolic equation and singular integral equations of the third kind (Russian). Different.ial'nJe Urnnenira, 7, no 1, 3-14 Bzhikhatlov, H.G., Karasev, I.M., Leskovskii, I.P. and Nahushev, A.M. 1 ) ( 1972 ) The •elected t•utio•• of the differeAtial aAd iAtegral eq•atio•• (Russian). Nal'chik: Kabard. Balbr. Univ., 290 p.
Butzer, P.L .
BIBLIOGRAPHY
883
Calderon, A.P. 1 ) { 1961 ) Lebesgue spaces of differentiable functions and distributions. SJmpoa. Pure Math. Amer. Math. Soc. Providence R.I., 4, �9.
In Proc.
CampOs, L.M.B.C. 1 ) { 1984) On a concept of derivative of complex order with applications to special functions. IMA J. Appl. Math., 33, no 2, 109-133. 2 ) { 1985) On rules of derivation with complex order for analytic and branched functions. Port•gal Math., 4:3, no 3, 347-376. 3) {1986) On a systematic approach to some properties of special functions. IMA J. Appl. Math., 36, no 2, 191-206. 4) { 1986) On extensions of the Laurents' theorem in the fractional calculus with applications to the generation of higher transcendental functions. Matem. Vunii, Yugoslavia, 38, 375-390. 5 ) (1989) On the branchpoint operator and the annihilation of differintegrations. SIAM J. Math. A nal., 20, no 2, 439-453. 6) ( 1989) On a generalized Mittag-Lemer theorem and implicit differintegration. 16id., 20, no 2, 454-467. 7) ( 1990) On the properties of differintegrations and branch-point derivatives, including annihilation. In Proc. Intern. Conf.: Fractional Calculu and it. Appl. (Tokyo, 1989) , ed. K.Nishimoto. Tokyo: Coli. Engin. Nihon Univ., 25-33. 8) { 1990) On generalization of the series of Taylor, Lagrange, Laurent and Teixeira. Inetrn. J. Math. and Math. Sci., 13, no 4, 687-708. 9) ( 1990) On the solution of some classes of fractional differential equations. Int. J. Math. and Math. Sci., 13, no 3, 481-496. Carbery, A., Gasper, G. and Trebels, W. 1 ) { 1986) On localized potential spaces. J. Approz. Theor,, 4:8, no 3, 251-261. Carleman, T. 1 ) ( 1922) Uber die Abelsche lntegralgleichung mit konstanten Integrationsgrenzen. Math. Z., 15, 111-120. 2 ) ( 1944) L 'integrale de Fourier et queationa qui a 'y rattachent. Ahnqvist and Wiksells Boktyckere, 1 19 p. Cartwright, D.I. and McMullen, J .R. 1 ) ( 1978) Edinburgh Math. Soc., 21, no 1 , 79--80.
A note on the fractional calculus.
Proc.
Note on Riemann's paper "VeJSuch einer allgemeinen Aufl'assung der Integration und Differentiation" , Werke, p. 331-344. Math. Ann., 16, 81-82. Center, R.W. 1 ) { 1848) On the value of (d/dx)8 x8 when 8 is a positive proper fraction.
Cayley, A. 1 ) { 1880)
Co.mbridge o.nd Dublin Math. J., 3, 163-169. 2 ) ( 1848) On differentiation with fractional indices, and on general differentiation. 16id., 3, 274-285. 3) ( 1849) On differentiation with fractional indices, and on general differentiation, II: On general differentiation. Ibid., 4:, 21-26. 4) (1849) On the symbolical value of the integral x - 1 dx. 16id., 4:, 261-284.
J
Chan, C.K. and Lu, P. 1 ) { 1981 ) On the stability of the J. Ph'l•· A : Mo.th. and Gen., 14:, no 3, 575-578.
solution of Abel's integral equation.
Chandrasekharan, K. and Minakshisundaram, S. 1 ) { 1952 ) Typical means. Tata inatitute Monographs. I. Oxford Univ. Press , 142 p. Chanillo, S. 1 ) ( 1981 ) HypeJSingular integrals and parabolic potentials. 7Tana. Amer. Math. Soc., 267, no 2, 531-547. 2 ) ( 1982 ) A riote on commutatoJS. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 31, no 1, 7-16.
and Wheeden, R.L. 1 ) ( 1985) V'-estimates for fractional integrals and Sobolev inequalities with applications to SchrOdinger operators. Commun. Part. Differ. Equat., 10, no 9, 1077-11 16.
Chanillo, S.
884
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Chen, Y.W. 1) {1959) Holder continuity and initial value problems of mixed type differential equations. Oomm. Math. Helv., 33, no 4, 296-321. 2) (1961) Entire solutions of a class of differential equations of mixed type. Oomm. Pure and Appl. Math., 14 , no 3, 229--255. Cheng, H. 1) (1982) The singular mixed problem for a class of Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation. J. Hangzhou Univ., 9, no 1, 1-16. 2) (1982) On mixed problem for non-homogeneous Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation. J. Hangzho11. Univ., 9, no 1, 67-73 Cheng Min-teh and Chen Yung-ho 1) {1956) Fractional integrals of functions of several variables with applications to the theory of approximation. Bull. A cad. Polon. Sci., 01. 3, 4, 639-641 . 2) (1957) Fractional integrals of periodic functions of several variables and the approximation by trigonometric polynomials. J. Peking Univ., 3, 259-282. Cheng Min-teh and Deng Dong-gao 1) (1979) Fractional integration of periodic functions of several variables in V space. Sci. Record (A cad. Sinica), 24, no 18, 817-820. Cho Nak Eun, Lee Sang Keun, Kim Yong Chan and Owa, S. 1) (1969) On certain fractional operators. Math. Japan., 34, no 3, 333-339. Choudhary, B. 1) (1973) An extension of Abel's integral equation. J. Math. A nal and Appl. , 44, no 1, 113-130. Chrysovergis, A. 1) (1971) Some remarks on Talenti's semigroup. Oanad. Math. Bull., 14 , no 2, 147-150. Chumakov, F.V. 1) (1970) The Abel equation with hypergeometric kernel (Russian). In Proc. Conf. on BoundarJ Value Problem• (Kazan, 1969), Kazan: lzdat. Kazan. Univ., 267-271. 2) (1971) An Abel type equation on a composite contour (Russian). Ve•t•i A kad. Navuk BSSR, Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Navuk, no 1, 55-81. Chumakov, F.V. and Vasil'ev, I.L. 1) (1980) Integral equations of Abel type on a closed contour (Russian). Ve•tnik Beloru••· Go•. Univ., Ser. 1, no 2, 4o-44. Chuvenkov, A.F. 1) (1978) Sobolev-Orlicz spaces of fractional order (Russian). lzv. Severo Kavkaz. Nauchn. T•entra Vyuh. Shkoly, Ser. E•te•tv. Nauk, no 1, 6-10. Civin, P. 1) (1940) Inequalities for trigonometric integrals. Preliminary report. Bull. A mer. Math. Soc., 48, no 5, 410. 2) (1941) Inequalities for trigonometric integrals. Duke Math. J., 8, no 4, 656-065. Clements, D.L. and Love, E.R. 1) (1974) Potential problems involving an annulus. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 78, no 1, 313-325. Cohn, W.S. 1) (1987) On fractional derivatives and star invariant spaces. Mich. Math. J., 34, no 3, 391-406. Colzani, L. 1) (1985) Hardy spaces on unit spheres. Boll. unione mat. ital., 84, no 1, 219-244. Conlan, J. and Koh, E.L. 1) (1975) A fractional differentiation theorem for the Laplace transform. Oanad. Math. Bull., 18, no 4, 605-606. Cooke, J .C. 1) (1956) A solution of Tranter's dual integral equations problem. Quart. J. Mech. and A ppl. Math., 9, no 1, 103-110. 2) (1965) The solution of triple integral equations in operational form. 16id. , 18, no 1 , 57-72. 3) (1972) The solution of triple and quadruple integral equations and Fourier-Bessel series. Ibid. , 25, no 2, 247-263.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
885
Copson, E.T. 1 ) (1943) Some applications of Marsel Riesz's integrals of fractional order. Proc. RoJ. Soc. Edinburg/&, A 61, 260-272. 2 ) (1947) On the Riesz-Riemann-Liouville integral. Proc. Edinburg/& Matk. Soc., 8, no 2, 25-36. 3) (1947) On the problem of the electrified disc. 16id., no 3, 14-19. 4) (1956) Some applications of Riesz's method. In Proc. Conf. Diff. Equat., Univ. Macyland: Book Stora, 107-113. 5 ) ( 1958) On a singular boundacy value problem for an equation of hyperbolic type. Arck. Ration. Meek. and AnalJ•i•, 1, no 4, 349-356. 6) ( 1961 ) On certain dUAl integral equations. Proc. Glaagow Matk. A aaoc., 5, no 1, 21-24.
and Erdelyi, A. 1 ) (1958) On a partial differential equation with two singular lines. Arck. Ration. Meek. and AnalJaia, 2, no 1, 76-86. Cossar, J. 1 ) (1941 ) A theorem on Cesaro summability. J. London Matk. Soc., 16, 56-68. Cotlar, M. and Panzone, R. 1 ) ( 1960) Generalized potential operators. Rev. Union Mat. A rgentina, 19, no 1 , 3--41 . Courant, R . and Hilbert, D. 1 ) ( 1951 ) Metkoda of Matkematical Pkyaica, 3d ed., Vol. 2 (Ruuian). Moscow, Leningrad: Goa. lzdat. Tehn.-Teor. Lit., 544 p. (Enpsh ed. in New York: lnterscience Publ., 1953) .
Copson, E.T.
Darboux, G. 1) ( 1915 ) Le�on• ..r Ia tkeorie ginera.le dea ..rface• et lea application• geomitriq•ea d• calcul infiniteaimal. Vol. 2. Paris: Gauthier-Villars . Davis, H.T. 1 ) (1924 ) Fractional operations as applied to a class of Volterra integral equations. A mer. J. Matk., 46, 95-109. 2 ) ( 1927) The applications of fractional operators to functional equations. 16id., 49, no 1 , 123-142. 3) ( 1927) A survey of methods for the inversion of integrals of Volterra type. Indiana Univ. Studiea. Stud, no 76, 77; 72 p. 4) (1936) Tke Tkeory of Linear Operator•. Bloomington, Indiana: Principia Press, 617 p.
Hypersingular integrals and anisotropic potentials (Russian). Erevan, Dep. in Annyan. NIINTI 08.01.65, no 1, 25 p. 2 ) ( 1986) Sobolev-Liouville spaces with quasi-homogeneous norm (Russian). /zv. Vy..k. Uckebn. Zavetl. Mat., no 5, 82-84. 3) ( 1986) Spaces of anisotropic potentials. Applications (Russian). rntlJ Mat. /nat.
Davtyan, A.A. 1 ) (1984 )
Stellov, 173, 113-124.
Delerue, P. 1 ) (1953) Sur le calcul symbolique a n variables et sur les fonctions hyperbesseliennes. A nn. Soc. Sci. Bnzellea, Ser. 1, 67, no 2, 83-104.
and Osler, T.J. 1 ) ( 1974) Differences of fractional order. Matk. Comput., 28, no 125, 185-202. Diaz, J.B. and Weinberger, H.F. 1 ) ( 1953) A solution of the singul• initial value problem for the Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation. Proc. Amer. MtJ.tk. Soc., 4, no 5, 703-715. Didenko, A.V. 1 ) ( 1984) On the solution of the composite equation of Abel type in generalized functions (Russian). Odessa, Dep. in Ukrain. VINITI 15.08.84, no 1464, 11 p. 2 ) ( 1984) On the solutions of systems of some convolution type equations in the space of generalized functions (Russian). Minsk, Dep. in VINITI 11 .09.84, no 6170, 10 p. 3) ( 1985) On the solution of a class of the integro-difl'erential equations of fractional order (Russian). Odessa, Dep. in Ukrain. NIINTI 01.04.85, no 662, 13 p. Dimovski, I.H. 1 ) (1981 ) Convolution representation of the commutant of Gel'fond-Leont'ev integration operator. C. R. Acad. Bulg. Sci., 34, no 12, 1643-1646.
Diaz, J .B.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
886
Representation fonnulas for the commutants of integer powers of Gel'fond Leont'ev integration operators. In Proc. Conf. Mt�.th. i Mt�.th. Ed•c., Union Bt�.lg. Mt�.th. (Sunny Beach, 1982), Sofia: Publ. House Bulg. Acad. Sci., 166-172. 3) (1982) Convolutional calculus. Sofia: Publ. House Bulg. Acad. Sci., 2, 198 p. (Second ed.: Dorbrecht. Boston and London: Kluwer Acad. Publ., East Europ. Ser. 1990, 43 , 184 p). Dimovsld, I.H. and Kiryakova, V.S. 1) (1983) Convolution and commutant of Gel'fond Leont'iev operator of integration. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Con•tr. F•nction Theorr'81 (Varna, 1981), Sofia: Publ. House Bulg. Acad. Soi., 288-294. 2) (1985) Transmutations, convolutions and fractional powers of Bessel-type operators via Meijer's G-function. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Complez Ant�.lr•i• And Appl.'83 (Varna, 1983), Sofia: Publ. House Bulg. Acad. Sci., 45-66 . Din Khoang An 1) (1989) The integral equations with Legendre function in the kernels in the singular cases (Russian). Dokl. Ahd. Nt�.•k BSSR, 33, DO 7, 591-594. Dinghas, A. 1) {1958) Zur Existenz von Fixpunkten bei Abblldungen vom Abel-Liouvilleschen Typus. Math. Z., 70, no 2, 174-189. 2) (1982)
Ditkin, V.A. and Prudnikov, A.P. 1) (1974) Integral tran•form• and operationAl ct�.lc•l•• (Russian) . Moscow: Nauka, 542 p. Dixit, L .A. 1) (1977) An integral equation involving generalized Rice's polynomials. Proc. Indian A cad. Sci., A 85, DO 5, 379-382. 2) (1978) An integral equation involving 4F3 in the kernel. IndiAn J. P.re t1.nd A ppl. Math., 9, no 7, 739-745. Doetsch, G. 1 ) (1937) Theone •nd A nwendung der LAplace- Tran•formtl.tion.
436 p. 2) {1956) Ht�.ntlhch der Laplace- Tran•formtl.tion. 3, 300 p.
Berlin: Springer,
Basel und Stuttgart: Birhiuser Verlag,
and Osipov, A.V. 1) (1983) The inversion of Abel equation by means of cubical splines (Russian). In Calct�.ltl.tion •J•tem• And algorithm•. Rostov n/D: Izdat. Rostov. Univ., 1 14-121. Domingues, A.G. and Trione, E.S. 1) (1979) On the Laplace transfonns of retarded, Lorentz-invariant functions. Atlt1. MAth., 31 , no 1, 51-62. Drianov, D.P. 1) (1982) Average modulus of smoothness of fractional index and fractional order derivatives. C. R. Acad. Bt�.lg. Sci., 35 , DO 12, 1635-1637. 2) {1983) Average modulus of smoothness of fractional index and applications. Ibid., 36, no 1 , 41-43. 3) {1985) Equivalence between fractional average modulus of smoothness and fractional K-functional. 16id., 38 , no 12, 1609-1612. Duduchava, R.V. 1) {1970) Singular integral operaton in a Holder space with weight (Russian). Ddl. Ahtl. Nt�.•k SSSR, 191 , no 1, 1�19. 2) {1970) The boundedness of the singular integration operator in Holder spaces ·with weight (Russian). In Mat. ..led., Kishinev: Inst. Mat. with Vychisl. Tsentr. Akad. Nauk MSSR, 5, vyp. 1 , 5�76. Dunford, M . and Schwartz, J.T. 1) {1962) Linear operator•. General theorr (Russian). Moacow: lzdat . Inoetr. Lit., 895 p. (English ed. in Intencience Publ., 1953). Dveirin, M.Z. 1) {1977) The problems of best approximation of the classes of functions analytic in the unit circle (Russian). in Proc. Intern. Conf. TeoriJa pri6lizh. /tl.nl:t•ii (Kaluga, 1975), Moacow: Naub, 129-132. Doktonkii, R.Ya.
J
887
BIBLIOGRAPHY � Dwivedi, A.P. and Trivedi, T .N. ) { ) Triple and quadruple integral equations occurring in diffraction theory. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., A 85, no
1 1977 1 1983
4, 179--185.
Dyn'kin, E.M. and Osilenker, B.P. ) { ) Weighted estimates of singular integrals and their applications (Russian). in Mathematical analysis. Itogi Nauki i Tekh.niki. Moscow: Akad . Nauk SSSR, VINITI, 21 , 42-129.
1 1986 3, 213-279. 1 1964 2 19665, 1024-1027. 671 3 1966 4 1967 118-137. 4, 767-770. 5 1968 5, 1075-1111. 6 1968 4, 782-785. 7 1968 3, 171-248. 1969 4, 517-615. 8 1970 9 71-96. 1981 10 19825, 1054-1058. 103-111. 11 1984 12 81-181. 19876, 523-542. 1 1982 1 1958 5, 85-108. 2 1958 2, 210-213. 3 1958 lzv. 5, 107-120.
Dzherbashyan, A.M. ) { ) Equilibrhun relations and factorization theorems for functions that are meromorphic in the half plane (Russian). Izd. Akad. Nauk Armyan. SSR, Ser. Mat., 21, no
Dzherbashyan, M.M. ) { ) The parametric representation of some general classes of meromorphic functions in the unit circle (Russian) . Dokl. Akad. Nnk SSSR, 157, no ) { ) Integral transforms and representations of Junctions in the complex domain (Russian). Moscow: Naulca, p. ) { ) Classes of functions and their parametric representation (Russian). In Intern. Conf. Contemporary Problems in Theory Anal. Functions. (Erevan, ) Moscow: Nauka, ){ ) A generalized Riemann-Liouville operator and some applications of it (Russian) . Dokl. A kad. Nav.k SSSR, 177, no )( ) A generalized Riemann-Liouville operator and some of its applications (Russian). Izv. A kad. Nav.k SSSR, Ser. Mat., 32, no ) { ) An extension of the Denjoy-Carleman quasianalytic classes (Russian) . Dole/. Akad. Nav.k SSSR, 180 , no ) { ) An extension of the Denjoy-Carleman quasianalytic classes (Russian). Izv. Akad. Nauk A rmyan. SSR, Ser. Mat., 3, no 7a) ( ) The theory of factorization of functions meromorphic in the disc (Russian). Mat. Sb., 79, Vyp. ) { ) A boundary value problem for a Sturm-Liouville type differential operator of fractional order (Russian). Izv. Akad. Nauk Armyan. SSR, Ser. Mat. , 5 , rio
1965 , ,
2,
) { ) Basisness of biorthogonal systems generated by boundary value problems for differential operators of fractional order (Russian). DoH. Akad. Nnk SSSR, 261 , no ) ( ) Basisness of biorthogonal systems generated by boundary value problems for differential operators of fractional order (Russian). In Proc. 7th. soviet-ceskoslov. semin. Appl. of Methods of Theory Funct. and Functional Analysis to Problema of Math.. Physics. Erevan: lzdat. Erevan. Univ., )( ) Interpolation and spectral expansions associated with differential operators of fractional order (Russian). lzv. Akad. Nav.k Armyan. SSR, Ser. Mat., 19, no ) ( no
2,
) On a boundary value problem in the complex domain (Russian). Ib id, 22,
Dzherbashyan, M.M. and Martirosyan, V.M. ) ( ) On the theory of a-quasianalytic classes (Russian). Izd. A kad. Nav.k Armyan. SSR, Ser. Mat., 17, no
4, 264-306.
Dzherbashyan, M.M. and Nersesyan, A.B. ) { ) The criterion of the expansion of the functions to the Dirichlet series (Russian) . Izv. Akad. Nauk Armyan. SSR, Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nav.k, 1 1 , no ){ ) On the application of some integra-differential operators (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 121, no ) { ) Some integro-differential operators and quasi-analytical classes of functions which are connected with them (Russian). Akad. Nauk Armyan. SSR, Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nauk, 1 1 , no
888
BffiLIOGRAPHY
4) (1960) The expansions on special biorthogonal systems and boundary value problems for the differential equations of fractional order (Russian) . Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 132, no 4, 747-750. 5) (1961} The expansions on some biorthogonal systems and boundary value problems for the differential equations of fractional order (Russian) . Trudy Mo&kov. Mat. Ohhch., 10, 89-179. 6) (1968) Fractional derivatives and the Cauchy problem for differential equations of fractional order (Russian) . lzv. Akad. Nauk Armyan. SSR, Ser. Mat. , 3, no 1 , 3-29.
Dzherbashyan, M.M. and Saakyan, B.A. 1) (1975) Classes of formulas and expansions of Taylor-Maclaurin type associated with differential operaton of fractional order (Russian) . lzv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat., 39, no 1, 69-122. 2) {1981) Expansions in series of generalized absolutely monotone functions (Russian) . A nal. Math., 7, no 2, 85-106. Dzyadyk, V.K. 1) (1953) On the best approximation in the class of periodic functions having a bounded &-th derivative (0 < 6 < 1) (Russian) . lzv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat., 1 7 , no 2, 135-162. Edels, H., Hearne, K. and Young, A. 1) (1962) Numerical solutions of the Abel integral equation. J. Math. and Phy&., 41 , no 1 , 62-75. Eflmov, A.V. 1) (1956) On approximation of certain classes of continuous functions by Fourier sums and by Fejer sums (Russian) . lzv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat., 22, no 1 , 81-116. 2} (1959) On approximation of continuous functions by Fourier sums (Russian) . U&pehi Mat. Nauk, 14, vyp . 2, 225-227. 3) (1960) On approximation of periodic functions by ValltSe-Poussin sums, II (Russian) . Izv. A kad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat., 24, no 3, 431-468. 4) (1961} The linear methods of approximation of some classes of continuous periodical functions (Russian) . 'l'n.dy Mat. ln&t. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 62, 3-47. Eggermont, P.P.B. 1) (1981) A new analysis of the trapezoidal-discretization method for the numerical solution of Abel-type integral equations. J. Integr. Equat., 3, no 4, 317-332 2) (1984} Stability and robustness of collection method for Abel type integral equations. Numer. Math., 45, no 3, 431-445. Elliott, J. 1) (1959) Absorbing barrier processes connected with the symmetric stable densities. lllinoi& J. Math., 3, 200-216. Elrod, H.G., Jr. 1) (1958) Note on a solution of the telegraphist's equation applicable to supersonic shear flow . J. Math. and Phy&., 37, no 1, �8. Emgusheva, G.P. and Nogin, V.A. 1) (1988) Riesz's derivatives with nonstandart truncation and it's application to the inversion and description of the potentials commuting with dilatations ( Russian) . Dok/. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 300, no 2, 277-280. { Trans!. in Soviet Math. Dokl. 37 {1 963), no 3, 644-646}. 2) (1989) Characterization of the functions from the anisotropical classes of Liouville's type ( Russian) . Izv. Vy&&h. Uchebn. zaved. Mat., no 7, 63-66. (Trans!. in Soviet Math. (Izv. VUZ)) Erdelyi, A. 1) (1939) Note on the transformation of Eulerian hypergeometric integrals. Quart. J. Math., Ozjortl &er., 10, 129-134. 2) (1939) Transformation of hypergeometric integrals by means of fractional integration by parts. Ibid., 10, 176-189. 3) (1940} On some biorthogonal sets of functions. Ibid., 11, no 42, 11 1-123. 4) (1940) On fractional integration and its application to the theory of Hankel transforms. Ibid., 1 1 , no 44, 293-303.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
889
5) (1940) A class of hypergeometric transfonns. J. London Math. Soc., 15, 209-212. 6) (1950) On some functional transformations. Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. e Politecn. di Torino, 10, 217-234. 7) (1963) An integral equation involving Legendre's polynomial. Amer. Matla. Montla., 70, no 6, 651--652 6) (1963) Some applications of fractional integration. Boeing Sci. Re•. Labor. Doctl.m. Matla. Note no 316, 01-62-0266, 23 p. 9) (1964) An integral equation involving Legendre functions. J. Soc. lndu•tr. and Appl. Matla., 12, no 1, 15-30. 10) (1965) An application of fractional integrals. J. AnalJ•e Math., 1-', 1 13-126. 1 1 ) (1965) Axially symmetric potentials and fractional integration. J. Soc. lnd••tr. and A ppl. Matla., 13, no 1, 216-228. 12 ) (1967) Some integral equations involving finite parts of divergent integrals. Gla•gow Math. J., 8, no 1, 50-54. 13) ( 1968) Some dual integral equations. SIAM J. Appl. Matla., 16, no 6, 1338-1340. 14) (1970) On the Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation. J. Analy•e Matla., 23, �102. 15) (1972) Fractional integrals of generalized functions. J. Au•tral. Matla. Soc., 1-', no 1 , 30-37. 16) (1974) Asymptotic evaluation of integrals involving a fractional derivative. SIAM J. Matla. A nal., 5, no 2, 159-171. 17) (1975) Fractional integrals of generalized functions. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Fractional Calcul•• and it• Appl. (New Haven, 1974), ed. B.Ross, Lect. Note• Matla., 467, 151-170
Erdelyi, A. and Kober, H. 1 ) ( 1940) Some Oxford •er., 11 , no 43, 212-221.
remarks on Hankel transfonns.
Quart. J. Matla.,
Erdelyi, A., Magnus, W., Oberbettinger, F. and Tricomi, F.G. 1 ) (1953) Higlaer Tran•cendental F•nction•. In 3 vols, Vol. 1. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 302 p. (Reprinted Krieger, Melbourne, Florida, 1981 ) . 2 ) (1953) Higlaer Tran•cendental Ft�.nction•, Vol. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 396 p. (Reprinted Krieger, Melbourne, Florida, 1981 ) . 3) (1954) Higlaer Tran•cendental Ft�.nction•, Vol. 3. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 292 p. (Reprinted Krieger, Melbourne, Florida, 1981 ) . 4) (1955) Table• of Integral Tran•form•. In 2 vols, Vol. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 451 p. Erdelyi, A. and McBride, A.C. 1 ) (1970) Anal., 1, no 4, 547-557.
Fractional integrals of distributions.
Erdelyi, A., and Sneddon, I.N. 1 ) ( 1962 ) Fractional Canad. J. Matla., 14, no 4, 685-693.
SIA M J. Matla.
integration and dual integral equations.
Eskin, G.I. 1 ) (1973) Bo•ndary valt1.e problem• for elliptic p6etl.dodifferential eq•ation• (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 232 p.
On connections of the modulus of smoothness of derivative with the best approximation and Fomier coefficients of function in Lp [O, 21r] (1 < p < oo ) (Russian). A:Jma.. Ata, Dep. in VINITI 28.01.82 no 380, 14 p. 2 ) ( 1982) The conditions of existence of the mixed Weyl derivatives in Lp ( [O , 21r]) ( 1 < p < oo ) and their structure properties (Russian). A:Jma..Ata, Dep. in VINITI 08.04.82, no 1675, 27 p. 3) ( 1984 ) On exactness of estimates of modulus of smoothness for functions in Lp [O, 21r), 1 < p < oo (Russian). In Modern f11.Ution• of tlae tlaeory of function• and functional analy•i•. Karaganda, 27-33.
Esmaganbetov, M.G. 1 ) (1982)
890
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Esmaganbetov, M.G., Nauryzbaev, K.Zh. and Smailov, E.S. 1) (1981) On the estimates of the modulus of smoothness of positive order in Lp (Russian). Alma-Ata, Dep. in VINITI 12.06.81 , no 2859, 15 p. Estrada, R. and Kanwal, R.P. 1) (1985) Distributional solutions of singular integral equations. J. lntegr. Equtl.t., 8, no 1 , 41-85.
Euler, L. 1) (1738) De progressionibvs transcendentibvs, sev qvarvm tennini generales algebraice dari negvevnt /L.Eulero/. In Comment. Acad. Sci. lmperiali& petropolitanae, 5 , 36-57. 2) (1956) Integral calculu& (Russian) . Moscow: Fizmatgiz, Vol. 3, 447 p.
Evsin, V.I. 1) (1973) The Holmgren problem for a certain equation with singular coefficients (Russian). Different&ial'nye Uravneniya, 9, no 1 , 41-48. 2) (1975) The solvability of the Holmgren problem for a certain degenerate elliptic equation (Russian). 16id., 1 1 , no 1, 38-46. Exton, H. 1) {1983) q-Hyperg eometric Function& and Application&. Chichester: Ellis Horwood Ltd, 347 p. Faber, V. and Wing, G.M . 1) (1986) Singular values of fractional operators: a unification of theorems of Hille, Tamarkin and Chang. J. Math. Anal. and A ppl., 1 2 0 , no 42, 745-760. Fabian, W. 1 ) (1935) Fractional calculus. Phil. Mag., 20, no 135, 781-789. 2) (1936) Fractional calculus. J. Math. and Phy&., 1 5 , 83-89 . 3) (1936) Expansions by the fractional calculus. Quart. J. Math., Oxford •er., 7, 252-255. 4) (1936) Fractional calculus. Math. Gazette, 2 0, 249-253. 5) (1954) The Riemann surfaces of a function and its fractional integral. Edinburgh Math. Note&, 39, 14-16. Faraut, J. 1} (1987) Integrales de Mal'Sel Riesz sur un cone symmetrique. Pub/. De. math., 18, 1 7-30. Fattorini, H.O. 1) (1983) A note on fractional derivatives of semigroups and cosine functions. Pacij. J. Math.., 109, no 2, 335-347. Favard, J . 1 ) (1937) Sur les meilleurs procedes d'approximation de certaines classes de fonctions par des polynomes trigonometriques. Bull. &ci. math.., 61, 209-224, 243-256
Fedoryuk, M.V. 1 ) (1959) Nonhomogeneous generalized functions of two variables (Russian). Mat. Sb. (N.S.), 49, no 4, 431-446. 2) (1977) The uddle-point method (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 368 p.
Fedosov, V.P. 1) (1978) On some generalized Abel equations (Russian). In Abel'• inver&ion and it& generalization• (Russian) . Novosibirsk: Inst. Teor. i Prikl. Meh. Sibirsk. Otdel. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 106-1 11.
Fedosov, V.P. and Yanenko, N.N. 1) (1984) Equations with partial derivatives of half-integral degree (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 276, no 4, 804-806. {Transl. in Soviet Phy&. Dokl. 29 (1984}, no 4, 288-291}
Feller, W. 1} (1952) On a generalization of Marcel Riesz potentials and the semigroups, generated by them. Comm. Semin. Math. L 'Univ. Lund (Medd. Lund• Univ. Mat. Semin.). Tom e n.ppl. , 2 1 , 72-81 . Fenyo, S.
and Stolle, H.W. 1) (1963) Theone und Praxi• der linearen Integralgleichungen. Berlin: Dtsch. Veri. Wiss., 3, 548 p.
Ferrar, W.L. 1) (1927-1928} Generalised derivatives and integrals. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 48, no 1-2, 92-105.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
891
Fettis, H.E. 1) (1964) On the numerical solution of equations of the Abel type. Math. Comput., 18, no 84, 491-496. Fihtengol'tz, G.M. 1) (1966) Course of integral and differential calculus. (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, Vol. 3, 858 p.
In
3
vols
Fisher, M.J. 1) (1971) Singular integrals and fractional powen of operators. Trtuu. A mer. Math. Soc., 161, no 2, 307-326. 2) (1971) Imaginary powers of the-indefinite integrals. A m er. J. Math. , 93, no 2, 317-328. 3) (1971) Purely imaginary powen of certain differential operators, I. Ibid., 93, no 2, 452-478. 4) (1972) Purely imaginary powen of certain differential operaton, II. Ibid., 94:, no 3, 835--860. 5) (1972) Fractional powers of operaton and Bessel potentials on Hilbert space. St11.d. Math., 4:1, no 2, 191-206. 6) (1972) Applications of the theory of imaginary powen of operators. RockJ Mountain J. Math., 2, no 3, 465-511. 7) (1973) Some generalizations of the hypersingular integral operators. St•d. Math., 4:7, no 2, 95-121 .
Flett, T.M. 1) (1958) On the absolute summability of a Fourier series and its conjugate series. Proc. London Math. Soc., Ser. 3, 8, no 30, 258-31 1. 2) (1958) Some more theorems concerning the absolute summability of Fourier series and power series. Ibid., 8, no 31 , 357-387. 3) (1958) A note on some inequalities. Proc. Glaag ow Math. A aaoc., 4:, no 1, 7-1 5. 4) (1959) Some theorems on fractional integrals. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 55, no 1 , 31-50. 5) (1968) Mean values of power series. Pacij. J. Math., 25, no 3, 463-494. 6) (1971) Temperatures, Bessel potentials and Lipschitz spaces. Proc. London Math. Soc., 22, no 3, 385--45 1. 7) (1972) The dual of an inequality of Hardy and Littlewood and some related inequalities. J. Math. A nal. and Appl., 38, no 3, 746-785. 8) (1972) Lipschitz spaces of functions on the circle and the disc. Ibid., 39, no 1, 125-158. 9) (1973) On a theorem of Pitt. J. London Math. Soc., (2), 7, no 2, 376-384. Fofana, I. 1) (1989) Continuite de l'integrale fractionnaire et espace (Lf, IP ) a . C. R. A cad. aci.,
no 18, 525-527. and Krasnov, V.A. 1) (1973) Integral estimates of the fractional derivatives of a hannonic function and some of their applications (Russian). Differenbial'nJe UrtnmeniJa, 9, no 12, 2276-2279. Fourier, J. 1) (1955) The Analytical Theory of Heat. New York: Dover publ., 466 p. (Fint publ.: Thiorie Analytiq•e de Ia Chale11.r. Paris, 1822). Fox, Ch. 1) (1956) An application of fractional integration to chain transfonn theory. Proc. A mer. Math. Soc., 9, no 6, 968-973. 2) (1961) The G and H functions as symmetrical Fourier kernels. Trana. Amer. Math. Soc., 98, no 3, 395--429. 3) (1963) Integral transforms based upon fractional integration. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 59, no 1 , 63-71 4) (1965) A formal solution of certain dual integral equations. 7rana. Amer. Math. Soc., 1 19, no 3, 389-398. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 61, 5) (1965) An inversion fonnula for the kernel no 3, 457-467. 6) (1971) Solving integral equations by L and L - 1 operaton. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 29, no 2, 299-306. Paria, Ser. 1, 308,
Foht, A.S.
Kv (x).
BffiLIOGRAPHY
892
Applications of Laplace transforms and their inverses. 16id., 35, no 1, 193-200. Fremberg, M.E. 1) (1945) Proof of a theorem of M. Riesz concerning a generalization of the Riemann-Liouville integral. K•ngl. Fr•iogr. Silld. i L•nd Forlaandl., 15, no 27, 7) (1972)
265-276. 2) (1946) A study of generalized hyperbolic potentials with some physical applications. Comm. Semin. Mat/a. L 'Univ. L•nd., 7, 1-100. 3) (1946) Some applications of the Riesz potential to the theory of the electromagnetic field and the meson field. Proc. RoJ. Soc. London, Ser. A, 188, 18-31.
Frie, W. 1) (1963) Zur Auswertung no 5-8, 332-339.
der Abelschen lntegralgleichung.
Ann. PlaJ•· DDR, 10,
Friedlander, F.G. and Heins, A.E. 1) (1989) On the representation theorems of Poisson, Riemann and Volterra for the Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation. Arc/a. Ration. Mech.. and Anal,,u, 33, no 3, 219-230. 0.
1) (1935) Potentiel d'equilibre et capacite des ensembles avec quelques applications Ia theorie des fonctions. Medd. L•nd• Univ. Mat. Semin., 3, 1-118. Fujiwara, D. 1) (1967) Concrete characterization of the domains of fractional powers of some elliptic differential operators of the second order. Proc. Japan. A cad., 43, no 2,
Frostman,
a
82-86. 2) (1968) IJ'-theory for characterizing the domain of the fractional powe:n of - A in the half space. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokro, Sec. 1 , 15, part 2, 169-177. 3) (1969) On the asymptotic behaviour of the Green operators for elliptic boundary problems and the pure imaginary powe:n of some second order operators. J. Math.. Soc. Japan, 21, no 4, 481-522.
Fujiwara, M. 1) (1933) On the integration Mat/a. J., 37, 1 1�121 . Fukui, S.
and differentiation of an arbitrary order.
Toh.oh
and Owa, S. 1) (1990) An application of fractional calculus for Robertson's result. In Proc. latern. Conf. Fractional calc•l•• and it. appl. (Tokyo, 1989), ed. K. Nishimoto, Tokyo: Coli. Engin. Nihon Univ. , 39-43
Gabidzashvili, M.A. 1) (1985) Weighted inequalities for anisotropic potentials (Russian). In Mat. analr•i•: Na•cla. 7r.dr Gnzin. Polite/an. ln1t., no 3 (285), 48-57. 2) (1985) Weighted inequalities for integrals of potential's type in homogeneous spaces (Ruuian). In Report. of tlae erteaded 1e11ion1 of a •eminar of tlae I. N. Veba ln1t. A ppl. Mat/a. (Tbilisi, 1965). Tbilisi. Gos. Univ., 1 , no 2, 37-40. 3) (1986) Weighted inequalities for Riesz potentials and their generalizations (Russian). Soohllacla. Aiatl. Nad Gnzin. SSR, 121, no 1, 37-40. 4) (1986) Weighted inequalities for anisotropic potentials (Russian) . Trudy TbiliBB. Mat. lost. Rumadze Akad. Nault Gruzin. SSR, no 82, 25-36. 5) (1988) Weighted inequalities for anisotropic potentials (Russian). 16id., no 89, 3-11. 6) (1989) Weighted inequalities for potentials in the spaces of homogeneous type (Russian). Soo6.1acla. A htl. Nad Gnzia. SSR, 133, no 1, 17-20.
I.Z. and Kokilashvili, V.M. 1 ) (1991) Two-weight inequalities for generalized potentials (Russian). 7r.dr Mat. la1t. Stdlov, 194. Gabidzashvili, M.A. and Kokilashvili, V .M. 1) (1990) Weighted estimates for fractional integrals on the curves (Russian). Doil. Ahd. Nad SSSR, 310, no 1 , 14-17. Gaer, M.C. 1) (1968) Fractional derivatives and entire functions. Ph. Dr. thes. , Univ. of Illinois. Urbana, Illinois, 91 p. 2) (1975) Interpolation series for fractional derivatives and iterates of functions and operators. J. Mat/a. Anal. and Appl., 50, no 1 , 135-141.
Gabidzashvili, M,A., Genebashvili,
BIBLIOGRAPHY
893
Gaer, M.C. and Rubel, L.A. 1 ) (1971) The fractional derivative via entire functions. Ibid., 34, no 2, 289-301 . 2) (1975) The fractional derivative and entire functions. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Fractional Calc11.l11.a and ita Appl. (New Haven, 1974), ed. B.Ross, Lect. No tea Math., 457, 171-206. Gahov, F.D. 1) (1977) BoundarJ value problema, 3rd ed. (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 640 p. (Transl. of second ed. in Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1966, 561 p.). Gahov, F.D. and Chersldi, Yu.I. 1 ) (1978) Equation• of convolution type (Russian). Moscow : Nauka, 295 p. Gaimnazarov, G. 1) (1981) Moduli of smoothness of fractional order of functions defined on the whole real axis (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk Tadzhik. SSR, 24, no 3, 148-150. 2) (1985) Some relations for moduli of smoothness of fractional order in the space Lp (-oo, oo) (Russian). Izv. Akad. Nauk Tadzhik. SSR. Otdel. Fiz.-Mat. Him. i Geol. Nauk, no 3 (97), 8-13. Ganeev, R.M. 1) (1979) On Abel's generalized integral equation (Russian) . In Diff. equat. and m ath. phJa.: Nauch. Trudy K11.i6yah ev. Ped. lnat., 232, Vyp. 1, 12-14. 2) (1982) Solution of Abel's generalized integral equation with constant coefficients (Russian). Izv. Vy.uh. Uchebn. zaved. Mat., no 6, 14-18. {Transl. in Soviet Math. Izv. V UZ), 26 (1982), no 6, 13--18}
(
Garabedian, H.L., Hille, E. and Wall, H.S. 1) (1941) Formulations of the Hausdorff inclusion theorem. Duke Math. J., 8, 193-213. Garding, L. 1 ) (1947) The solution of Cauchy's problem for two totally hyperbolic linear differential equations by means of Riesz integrals. Ann. Math., Ser. 2, 48, no 4, 785-826. 2) (1970) Marcel Riesz in memoriam. Acta Math., 124, no 1-2, I-XI. Garnett, J .B. 1) (1984) Bounded analytic function• (Russian). Moscow: Mir, 470 p. Gasper, G. and Trebels, W. 1) (1978) Jacobi and Hankel multipliers of type (p, q) , 1 < p < q < oo. Math. Ann., 237, no 3, 243-251. 2) (1979) A characterization of localized Bessel potential spaces and applications to Jacobi and Hankel multipliers. St11.d. Math., 65, 243--278. 3) (1979) Multiplier criteria of Ho der type for Jacobi series and application to Jacobi series and Hankel transforms. Math. Ann., 242, no 3, 225-240. 4) (1982) Nec y conditions for Hankel multipliers. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 31 , no 3, 403--414.
rman
essar
Gatto, A.E., Gutierrez, C.E. and Wheeden, R.L. 1) (1983) On weighted fractional integrals. In Proc. Conf. on harmonic analy•i• in honour of A.Zygmund. Wadawath Intern. Gro'tl.p (Belmont, 1961). Calif.: Univ. of Chicago, 1, 124-137. 2) (1985) Fractional integrals on weighted HP spaces. Trana. Amer. Math. Soc., 289 , no 2, 575-589. Gearhart, L. 1 ) (1979) The Weyl semigroup and left translation invariant subspaces. J. Math. A nal. and Appl., 67, no 1, 75-91 . Geisberg, S,P. 1 ) (1965) A generalization of Hadamard's inequality (Russian). Leningrad Meh. ln&t. 56. Nauch. T_rudov, no 50, 42-54. 2) (1967) The analogues of the S.N .Bernstein's inequalities for the fractional derivative (Russian). In Queat. appl. math. and geomet. modelir.: Short content. of report• of !5th nauch. conf. (Leningrad, 1967), Leningrad. lnzhen.-Stroit. Inst., 5-10. 3) (1968) Fractional derivatives of functions bounded on the axis (Russian). lzv. Vyaah. Uchebn. Zaved. Mat., no 1 1 , 51-69.
BffiLIOGRAPHY
894
Gel'fand, I.M . and Graev, M .I. 1) (1955) The analogue of the Plancherel formula for the classical groups. Trudy Modow. Mat. Ohahch., 4, 375-404. Gel'fand, I.M ., Graev, M.I. and Vilenldn, N.Ya. 1) (1962) Integral geometry and connected queationa of repreaentation theory (Russian). Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 656 p. (Transl. as Generalized Function&. Vol.5: Integral Geometry and Repreaentation Theory, New York: Acad. Press, 1966, 499 p.). Gel'fand, I.M. and Shilov, G.E. I) (1958) The apace& of teat and g eneralized Junction& (Russian). Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 307 p. (Transl. as Generalized Function&. Vol. 1: Propertiea and Operation&, New York: Acad. Press, 1964, 423 p.). 2) (1959) Generalized Function• and Operation• on them (Russian). Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 470 p. (Transl. as Generalized Function&. Vol. 2: Space& of Fundam ental and Generalized Function&, New York: Acad. Press, 1968, 261 p.) Gel'fond, A.O. 1) {1967) Th e calculua offinite difference& (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 375 p. Gel'fond, A.O. and Leont'ev, A.F. 1) {1951) On a generalization of Fourier series (Russian). Mat. Sh. (N.S.), 29(7), no 3, 477-500. Gel'man, I.V. 1) {1960) On integrals of potential type in the Orlicz' spaces (Russian). Izv. Vr•ah. Uchehn. Zaved. Mat., no 2, 44-56. Gerlach, W. and Wolfersdorf, L.von 1) {1986) On approximate computation of the values of the normal derivative of solutions to linear partial differential equations of second order with application to Abel's integral equation. Z. angew. Math. und Mech., 66 , no 1, 31-36. Gilbert, R.P. 1) {1960) On the singularities of generalized axially symmetric potentials. A rch. Ratio•. Mech. and At�.alraia, 6, no 2, 171-176. 2) {1989) Ftmctiofl. Theoretic Method& ifl. Partial Differet�.tial Equatio••· New York, London: Acad. Press, 311 p. Gindikin, S.O. 1) {1964) Analysis in homogeneous domains (Russian). U•pehi Mat. Nauk, 1 9, no 4, 3-92. 2) {1967) The Cauchy problem for strongly homogeneous differential operators (Russian). Trudy Moakov. Mat. Ohahch., 1 6, 181-208. Ginzburg, A S. 1) {1984) Traces of functions from weighted classes (Russian). Izv. Vyuh. Uchdt�.. Zaved. Mat., no 4, 61--64. {Trans. in Soviet Math. {IZ'II. VUZ), 2 3 (1984) , no 4, 30-64.}. .
Glaeske, H.-J . 1) {1984) Some investigations on the Mebler-Fock transform of distributions. In Proc. Cot�./. Cot�.verg et�.ce afl.d Get�.eralized Fut�.ctio•• (Katowice, 1983). Warsawa: Publ. House Polish Acad. Soi., 43-50. 2) {1986) Some investigations concerning the Mehler-Fock and the Kontorovich-Lebedev transformation. In Proc. It�.tem. Cot�./. Complez At�.aly•i• at�.d Appl., 85 (Varna, 1985). Sofia: Puh l. Houae Bulg. Acad. Sci., 226-238. Glaeske, H.-J . and Hess, A. 1) {1968) A convolution connected with the Kontorovich-Lebedev transform. Math. Z., 193, 67-78. 2) {1987) On the convolution theorem of the Mebler-Fock transforms for a class of generalized functions, I. Math. Nachr., 131 , 107-117. 3) {1968) On the convolution theorem of the Mehle�Fock transform for a class of generalized functions, n. /hid., 136, 119-129. Godunova, E.K. and Levin, y.I. 1) {1969) Certain integral inequalities contai�g derivatives (Russian) . IZ'II. Vra•h. Uchehn. Zaved. Mat., 12, 2�24. Gohberg, I.Ts. 1) (1951) On linear equations in normed spaces (Russian). Dokl. A kad. Nauk SSSR, 76, no 4, 477-480.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
895
Gobberg, I.Ts. and Krein, M.G. 1 ) ( 1957) Fundamental aspects of defect numbers, root numbers and indices of linear operators (Russian). U8peh.i Mat. Nauk, 12, no 2,
43-118.
Gobberg, I.Ts. and Krupnik, M.Ya. 1 ) ( 1968) The spectrum of singular integral operators in Lp spaces (Russian). Studia Math.., 31 , no 4, 347-362. 2) ( 1969) The spectrum of singular integral operators in Lp spaces with weight (Russian). Do kl. A kad. Nauk SSSR, 185, no 4, 745-748. , 3) ( 1971 ) Singular integral operators with piecewise continuous coefficients and their symbols (Russian). Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat., 36, no 4, 940-964. 4) ( 1973) Introduction to the theory of one-dimen8ional 8ingular integral operators (Russian). Kishinev: Shtiintsa, 426 p. 5 ) (1973) Singular integral equations with unbounded coefficients (Russian). In Mat. I88led., Kishinev: lnst. Mat. s Vychisl. Tsentr. Akad. Nauk MSSR, 5, no 3, 46-57 Gomes, M.I. and Pestana, D.D. 1 ) ( 1978) The use of fractional calculus in probability. Portugal Math.., 37, no 3-4, 259-271.
Gopala Rao, V.R. 1 ) ( 1977) A characterization of parabolic function spaces. A mer. J. Math.., 99, no 5, 985-993. 2 ) (1978) Parabolic function spaces with mixed norm. Trans. Amer. Math.. Soc., 246, no 2, 451-461.
Gordeev, A.M. 1 ) ( 1968) Certain boundary value problems for a generalized Euler-Poisson Darboux equation (Russian) . Volzh.. Mat. Sb., Kuibyshev: Ped. Inst., Vyp. 6,
56-61. Gordon, A.N. 1 ) ( 1954 ) Dual integral equations. J. London Math.. Soc., 29, no 3, 360-363. Gorenflo, R. 1 ) ( 1965 ) LOsung einer Abelschen Integralgleichung bei Anwesenheit von Storungen mittels quadratischer Optimierung. Z. angew. Math.. und Mech.., 45, S.-H. T33-T35. 2 ) (1979) Numerical treatment of Abel integral equations. In Inverse and Improperly po8ed probl. in DijJ. Equat. (Berlin, 1979) , ed. G.Anger. Akademie-Verlag, 125-133. 3) ( 1987) Computation of rough solution of Abel integral equations. In Inverse and Ill-posed probl., eds H.W.Engl and C.W .Groetsch, 195-210. 4) (1987) Newtonsche Aufheizung, Abelsche lntegralgleichungen zweiter Art und Mittag LefBer-Funktionen. Z. Naturfor8ch.., 42a, 1141-1146. 5 ) (1987) On numerical treatment of first kind Abel integral equations. Freie Univ. Berlin, Preprint no 258, 21 p. 6) (1990) On stabilizing the inversion of Abel integral operators. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Fractional Calculu8 and its Appl. (Tokyo, 1989) , ed. K. Nishimoto. Tokyo: Coli. Engin. Nihon Univ., 44-51. Gorenflo, R. and Kovetz, Y. 1 ) ( 1966) Solution of an Abel-type integral equation in the presence of noise by quadratic progranu;ning. Numer. Math.., 8, 392-406 Gorenflo, R. and Vessela, S. 1 ) ( 1986) Abel integral equations: applications and analytic properties. Freie Univ. Berlin, Preprint no 236, 109 p. 2 ) ( 1987) Abel integral equations: applications and analytic properties, II. Ibid., no 245, 3) ( 1991 ) Abel integral equations: analysis and applications. Lect. Springer-Verlag, Vol. 1461, 215 p. Goyal, S.P. and Jain, R.M . 1 ) ( 1987) Fractional integral operators 38 p.
Note8 Math.. Berlin:
and the generalized hypergeometric functions. Indian J. Pure and Appl. Math.., 18, no 3, 251-259.
Greatbeed, S.S. 1 ) ( 1839) On general differentiation. Nos 1 and 2. Cambridg e Math.. J. , 1 , 11-21 and 109-117. 2) (1839) On the expansion of a function of a binomial. Ibid., 67-74.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
896
and Ulitko, A.F. 1) (1963) On a mixed bolUldary value problem of heat conduction for half-space (Russian). lnzl& enemo-fizich. Z., 6, no 10, 67-71. Grin 'ko, A.P. 1) (1991 ) On solution of a non-linear differential equation with generalized fractional derivative (Russian), Do/d. Akctl. Ncvd BSSR, 35, no 1 , 27-31. Grin'ko, A.P. and Kilbas, A.A. 1) (1990) Generalized fractional integrals in HOlder space with weights (Russian). Doll. Aictl. Nni BSSR, 34, 6, 493-496. 2) (1991) On composition of generalized fractional integrals. J. Math. Ru. cntl Erpo•it., 1 1 , no 2, 165-171. Grunwald, A.K. 1) ( 1867) Uber "begrenzte" Derivationen Wld deren Anwendung. Z. cngew.
Grinchenko, V.T.
MetA. •ntl Ph,•. , 12, 441-480.
and Rusia, K.C. 1) (1974) Invenion of an integral equation involving generalized Laguerre polynomial. Gcnitc, 25 , no 1, 45-54. Gupta, K.C. and Mittal, P.K. 1) (1970) The H-function transform. J. A•.tral. Math. Soc., 1 1, no 2, 142-148. Gupta, S.B. 1) (1973) On certain integral equations. Math. Bclhn., 3, 115-117. Gupta Sulaxana K. 1) ( 1967) On the strong Riesz means of Fourier series. lntlicn J. Math., 9 , no 1, 95-107. Guseinov, A.I. and Muhtarov, B.S. 1) (1980) lntrotl•ction to the theo7"J of nonlinear •ingalcr integral eq•ction• (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 415 p. Gwilliam, A.E. 1 ) (1936) On Lipschitz conditions. Proc. Lontlon Math. Soc., Ser. 2, 40, Gupta, H.L.
353-364.
Habibullah, G.M. 1) (1977) Some integral operaton with hypergeometric functions as kernels. B•ll. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. RSR, 21, no 3-4, 293-300. 2) (1981) An integral operator involving a Legendre function. J. Nct•r. Sci. cntl Math., 2 1 , no 2, 147-153.
Hadamard, J. 1) (1892) Essai sur l'etude des fonctions donnees par leur developpement de Taylor. J. math. p•re• et cppl., Ser. 4, I, 101-186. 2) (1978) The Cc•chJ problem for linear partial differential eq•ction• of hJPer6olic tJPe (Ruaian). Moscow: Nauka, 352 p. ('Iransl. from the French ed. Hermann, Paris, 1932 ) .
and Alshamani, J .G. 1) (1986) Liapunov stability of differential equations of non-integer order. Ara6 J. Math., T, no 1-2, 7-17. Hadid, S.B. and Gnaslewicz, R. 1) (1990) On the solutions of certain type of differential equation with fractional derivative. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Fractional Cclc•l•• antl it• Appl. (Tokyo, 1969), ed. K. Nishimoto. Tokyo: Coli. Engin. Nihon Univ., 52-55. Hai, D.D. and Ang, D.D. 1) {1967) Regularisation of Abel's integral equation. Proc. RoJ.
Hadid, S.B.
Soc. Etlinhrgh, lOT A, 165-166.
Hall, M .S., Quinn, D.W. and Weinacht, R.J. 1) (1974) Poisson integral formulas in generalized hi-axially symmetric potential theory. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 5, no 1 , 111-118.
and Lew, J.S. 1) (1969) Asymptotic expansion of a class of integral transfonns via Mellin transfonns. Arch. Ration. Mech. antl A nalJ•i•, 35, no 5,
Handelsman, R.A.
382-396. 2) (1971) Asymptotic expansion of a class of integral transforms dominated kernels. J. Math. A nal. antl Appl., 35, no 2, 405-433.
with algebraically
and Olmstead, W .E. 1) {1972) Asymptotic solution to a class of nonlinea.r Volterra integral equations. SIAM J. A ppl. Matlt.., 22, no 3, 373-384.
Handelsman, R.A.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
897
and Segovia, C. 1) (1984) Boundednea of fractional operators on IJ'-spaces with different weights. 7ran•. Amer. Mat/&. Soc., 285, no 2, 629-647. 2) (1984) A two weight inequality for the fractional integral when p = nfo. Proc. A mer. Matl&. Soc., 90, no 4, 555-562. Hardy, G.H. 1) (1917) Notes on some points in the integral calculus. XLVIII: On some properties of integrals of fractional order. Meuenger Matl&., <&T, no 10, 145-150. 2) (1922) Notes on some points in the integral calculus. LV: On the integration of Fourier series. 16id., 51, no 12, 186-192. 3) (1945) Riemann's form of Taylor's series. J. London Matl&. Soc., 20, no 1 , 48-57. 4) (1951) Divergent Sene• (Russian). Moscow: Izdat. Inostr. Lit., 504 p. (Transl. from Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949, 396 p.). Hardy, G.H., Landau, E. and Littlewood, J.E. 1) (1935) Some inequalities satisfied by the integrals or derivatives of real or analytic functions. Matl&. Z., 39, no 5, 677-695. Hardy, G.H. and Littlewood, J .E. 1) (1925) Some properties of fractional integrals. Proc. Harboure, E., Macias, R.A.
London Matl&. Soc., Ser. 2, 2-&, 37-41. (1926) Notes on the theory of series, V: On Parseval's theorem. Ibid., 26, 287-294. (1928) Some properties of fractional integrals, I. Matl&. Z., 27, no 4, 565-606. (1928) A convergence criterion for Fourier series. Ibid., 28, no 4, 612-634. (1932) Some properties of fractional integrals, II. Ibid., 3-&, 403-439. (1936) Some more theorems concerning Fourier series and Fourier power series. DuJ:e Matl&. J., 2, no 2, 354-382. 7) (1941) Theorems concerning mean values of analytic or harmonic functions. Quart. J. Matl&., O�:fonl •er., 12, no 48, 221-256
2) 3) 4) 5) 6)
Hardy, G.H., Littlewood, J .E. and P61ya, G. 1) (1926) The maximum of a certain bilinear form. Proc. London Matl&. Soc., Ser. 2, 25, 265--282. 2) (1948) lnequalitie• (Russian). Moscow: lzdat. Inostr. Lit., 458 p. (Engl. second ed. in Cambridge Univ. Press , 1952, 324 p.).
and Riesz, M. 1) (1915) Tl&e general tl&eorJ of Diricl&let'• •erie•. Cambridge Univ. Press , no 18, 78 p. Hardy, G.H. and Rogosinski, W.W. 1) (1943) Notes on Fourier series. I: On sine series with positive coefficients. J. London Matl&. Soc., 18, 50-57. Hardy, G.H. and Titchmarsh, E.C. 1) (1932) An integral equation. Proc. Cambridge Pl&il. Soc., 28, no 2, 165--173. Hasanov, A. 1) (1979) Problems with nonlocal boundary conditions for a class of equations of mixed type (Russian). Differenuial'nre Uravnenira, 15, no 1, 153-158. {Transl. in Dij. Eq·ut. 15 (1979), no 1 , 107-111.}. Hatcher, J.D. 1) (1985) A non-linear boundary problem. Proc. Amer. Matl&. Soc., 95, no 3,
Hardy, G.H.
441-448.
On certain convolution inequalities. Ibid., 36, no 2, 505--510. Heinig, H.P. 1) (1984) Weighted norm inequalities for classes of operators. Indiana Univ. Matl&. J., 33, no 4, 573-582. 2) (1985) Estimates for operators in mixed weighted IJ'-spaces. Tran•. Amer. Math. Soc., 287, no 2, 483-493. Helgason, S. 1) (1965) The Radon transform on Euclidean spaces, compact two-point homogeneous spaces and Grassmann manifolds. Acta Math., 113, no 3--4, 153-180. (English ed. in Birkhiuser, 1960). 2) (1983) The Radon tranaform. Moscow: Mir, 152 p.
Hedberg, L.I. 1) (1972)
BIBLIOGRAPHY
898
Zur Funktionentheorie der Wellengleichung mit Anwendungen auf spezielle Reihen und lntegrale mit Besselschen, Whittakerschen und Mathieuschen Funktionen. Comm. Math. HeltJ., 27, no 3-4 235-293. Herson, D,L. and Heywood, P. 1 ) ( 1974) On the range of some fractional integrals. J. London Math. Soc., Ser. 2, 8, no 4, 607-614. Herz , C.S. 1 ) ( 1968) Lipschitz spaces and Bernstein's theorem on absolutely convergent Fowier transfonns. J. M4th. 4nd Mech., 18, no 4, 283-323. Heywood, P. 1 ) (1967) On a modification of the Hilbert transform. J. London M4th. Soc., Ser. 2, 4:2, no 4, 641-645. 2) (1971 ) On the inversion of fractional integrals. lbid., 3, no 3, 531-538. 3 ) ( 1975) Improved boundedness conditions for Lowndes' operators. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinhrgh, A 73 , no 19, 291-299. Heywood, P. and Rooney, P.G. 1 ) ( 1975) On the boundedness of Lowndes' operators. J. Henrici, P. 1 ) ( 1957)
,
London Math. Soc., 10,
no
2, 241-248.
Higgins, T.P. 1 ) (1963) An inversion integral for a Gegenbauer transformation. J. Soc. Ind'lutr. and . A ppl. Math., 1 1 , no 4, 886-893 . 2 ) (1963) An inversion for a Jacobi integral transformation. Boeing Sci. Re•. Labor. Docum. Math., 01-82-0250. 3 ) ( 1964) A hypergeometrio function transform. J. Soc. lndudr. and Appl. Math., 12, no 3, 601-612. 4) ( 1965 ) The Rodrigues operator transform, Preliminary report. Boeing Sci. Re•. Labor. Docum. M4th. Note no 437, 01-82-0492, Seattle, Washington, 125 p. 5 ) ( i965) The Rodrigues operator transform. Tables of generalized Rodrigues formulas. lbid., no 438, 01-82-0493, Seattle, Washington, 55 p. 6) ( 1967) The use of fractional integral operators for solving nonhomogeneous differential equations. 16id., no 541 , 01-82-0677, Seattle, Washington, 19 p. Hille, E. 1 ) ( 1939) Notes on linear transformations, II: Analyticity of semi-groups. Ann. Math., 4:0, no 1, 1-47 2 ) (1945 ) Remarks on ergodic theorems. 71-an•. Amer. Math. Soc., 57, no 2, 246-269.
and Phillips, R.S. 1 ) ( 1962} Ft&nctional an4ly•i• and •emigroap• (Russian) . Moscow: lzdat. lnoetr. Lit., 829 p. (Trans!. from ed. in Amer. Math. Soc. Providence. R.I. 1957, 808 p. ) . Hille, E. and Tamarldn , J.D. 1 ) ( 1930) On the theory of linear integral equations. .Ann.
Hille, E.
Math., 3 1 , 479-528. 2 ) (1931 ) On the characteristic values of linear integral
equations. A cta Math., 5 7, 1-76. Hirsch, F. 1) ( 1976) Extension des proprietes des puissances fractionn.aires. Lect. Note• Math., 563, 1()()-120. 1.1.
1.1. and Widder, D.V. 1 ) ( 1958) The contJolution tran•form (Russian) . Moscow: lzdat. lnoetr. Lit., 312 p. (Transl. from ed. in Princeton Univ. Press , 1955, 268 p. ) . Holmgren, Hj. 1) ( 1865-1866} Om differentia.lkalkylen med indices af hvad natur som heist. Kongl. St�en•h Vetendap•-Ahd. Handl. Stockholm, 5, no 1 1 , 1-83. 2 2 2 ) (1867) Sur !'integration }'equation diff&entieBe (a2 + b2z + c2z )d y/dz2 + (at + btz)dy/dz + ao 11 = 0. lbid., 7, no 9, 1-58. Horvath, J. 1 ) (1978) Composition of hypei'Bingular integral operators. A ppl. A n41., 7, 171-190. Horvath, J., Ortner, M. and Wagner, P. 1 ) ( 1987) Analytic continuation and convolution of hypersingular higher Hilbert-Riesz kernels. J. Math. Anal. 4nd Appl., 123, no 2,
Hirsh man ,
1 ) ( 1953)
Hirshman,
429-447.
Fractional integration.
A mer. J. M4th., 7 5 ,
no
3-4 531-546. ,
BIBLIOGRAPHY
899
Hovel, H.W. and Westphal, U. 1) (1972) Fractional powers of closed operators. St•tl. Ma.th., 4:2, no 2, 177-194. Hrom�v, A.P. 1) (1976) An application of the fractional differentiation operator (Russian). In Different.ial'nre Uravneniya i Vrchi•l. Mat. Saratov: Izdat. Saratov. Univ., Vyp. 6, part 1, 3-22. Huber, A. 1) (1954) On the uniqueness of generalized axially symmetric potentials. A nn. Math., 60, no 2, 351-358.
Hughes, R.J. 1) (1977) On fractional integrals and derivatives in LP . Indiana Univ. Math. J., 26, no 2, 325-328. 2) (1977) Semigroups of unbounded line81" operators in Banach spaces. Tran•. Amer. Math. Soc., 230, no 505, 113-145.
Humbert, P. and Agarwal, R.P. 1) (1953) Sur la fonction de Mittag-Lemer et quelques-unes de ses generalisations. B•ll. •ci. math., 77, no 10, 180-185.
lbragimov, 1.1. 1) (1953) On the best approximation of a function whose a-th derivative has a discontinuity of the first kind (Russian). Dokl. Akatl. Nad SSSR, 89, no 6, 973-975. 2) (1953) On the best mean approximation of a function whose •-th derivative is of bounded variation on the interval [-1 , 1] (Russian). Ibid., 90, no 1 , 13-16. Il'in, V.P. 1) (1959) On a theorem of G.H. Hardy and J.E. Littlewood (Russian). Tntlr Mat. ln•t. Akad. Na•k SSSR. 53, 128-144. 2) (1962) The properties of some classes of differentiable functions of several variables defined in n-measurable domain (Russian) . Ibid., 66, 227-383. Imanaliev, M.I. and Veber, V.K. 1) (1960) Generalization and application of functions of Mittag-Lemer type (Russian). In Stutlie• in integro-tlifferential equation•. Frunze: Ilim, no 13, 49-59. Isaacs, G.L. 1) (1953) M. Riesz's mean value theorem for infinite integrals. J. London Ma.th. Soc., 28, no 110, 171-176. 2) (1961) The iteration formula for inverted fractional integrals. Proc. London Ma.th. Soc., Ser. 3, 1 1 , no 42, 213-238. 3) (1989) Fractional derivatives as inverses. Canatl. J. Math., 4:1, no 1, 178-192. Isamukhamedov, S.S. and Oramov, Zh. 1) (1962) On bound8l"y value problems for equations of mixed type of the second kind with a nonsmooth line of degeneracy (Russian). Differenbial'nye Uravneniya., 18, no 2, 324-334. {Transl. in Dif. Eq•at. 18 {1982), no 2, 263-271.}. Ivanov, L .A. and Kipriyanov, I.A. 1) (1989) Riesz' potentials and Cauchy problems for the wave equation in the Lorentz space (Russian). In Appl. of new meth od• of analy•i• to tliff. eq•at. Voronezh: Izdat. Voronezh. Univ., 31-36. lvashkina, G.A. and Nevostruev, L.M . 1) (1978) Boundary value problem with displacement for the equation of second kind (Russi an). Differenbia.l'nye Uravneniya, 14:, no 2, 281-290. {Transl. in Dif. Eq•at. 14: (1978), no 2, 196-202.}. Izumi, S. 1) (1953) Some trigonometrical series, III. J. Ma.th. Tokro, 1, no 2-3, 126-136. Izumi, S. and Sato, M. 1) (1955) Some trigonometrical series, XVII. Proc. Ja.pan. Aca.tl. Sci., 31, no 10, 659-684. Jackson, F.H. 1) (1910) On q-definite integrals. Quart. J. Pure anti. Appl. Ma.th., 4:1, 193-203. 2) (1951) Basic integration. Quart. J. Ma.th., Ozfortl •er., 2, no 5, 1-16. Jain, N.C. 1) (1970) A relation between Mellin transform and Weyl (fractional) integral of two variables. A nn. polon. math., 23, no 3, 255-257.
900
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Jevtic, M. 1) (1986) On the integral means of the fractional derivatives of the atomic inner function. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Complez Analyaia and App/. '85 (Varna, 1985), Sofia: Publ. House Bu1g. Acad. Sci., 290-294. 2) (1989) Projection theorems fractional derivatives and inclusion theorems for mixed-norm spaces on the ball. Analyaia, 9, no 1-2, 83-105. Joachimsthal, F. 1) (1861) Ueber ein Attractionsproblem. J. fir reine und angew. Math., 58, 135-137. Johnson, R. 1) (1973) Temperatures, Riesz potentials and the Lipschitz spaces of Herz. Proc. London Math. Soc., 27, no 2, 290-316. Jones, B.F., Jr. 1) (1968) Lipschitz spaces and the heat equation. J. Math. and Mech., 18, no 5, 379-409. Jones, D.S. 1) (1956) A new method for calculating scattering with particular reference to the circular disk. Comm. Pure and Appl. Math., 9, no 4, 713-746. 2) {1970) A modified Hilbert transform. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, A 69 , no 1, 45-76. Joshi, B.K. 1) {1973) An integral equation involving Whittaker's function. Math. Student., 41, no 4, 407-408. Joshi, C.M. 1 ) (1966) Fractional integration and integral representations of certain generalized hypergeometric functions. Ganita, 17, no 2, 79-88. Joshi, J.M.C. 1) {1961 ) Fractional integration and generalized Hankel transform. Agra Univ. J. Rea. (Sci.), 1 0, no 2, 293-300. Juberg, R.K. 1) (1972) Finite Hilbert transforms in Lp . Bull. A mer. Math. Soc., 78, no 3, 435-438. 2) (1972) On the boundedness of certain singular integral operators. Hilbert space operators and operator algebras: In Proc. Intern. Con/., Colloq. Math. Soc. Jan oa B o lyai (Tihany, 1970). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ., 5, 305-318. 3) (1973) The spectra for operators of a basic collection. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 79 , no 4, 821-824.
Kabanov, S.N. 1) (1984) The theorem on the equiconvergence for one operator of fractional differentiation (Russian) . In Reaearchea on modern prob lem• of math: Mater. con/. roung acienti•t• of Saratov. univ., Saratov, 38-41; Dep. in VINITI 23.05.84, no 3318. 2) {1988) The theorem on the equiconvergence for the operator of differentiation of order n with boundary conditions generated by linear functionals (Russian) . In Matematika i prilozh., Saratov: lzdat. Saratov. Univ., 4-6. Kac, M. 1) (1950) On some connections between probability theory and differential and integral equations. In Proc. Sec. Berkeler Symp. Math. Stat. and Pro6., Berkeley, 189-21 5. Kalia, R.M . 1) (1970) Theorems on a new class of integral transforms, III. Acta Mezic. cienc. J tecno l., 4, no 1, 1-5. Kalisch, G.K. I) (1967) On fractional integrals of pure imaginary order in Lp . Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 18, no 1, 136-139. 2) (1972) On the similarity of certain operators. Hilbert space operators and operator algebras. In Proc. Intern. Con/., Colog. Math. Soc. Jan oa Bolyai (Tihany, 1970) . Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ., 5, 333-346. Kalla, S.L . 1) (1966) Some theorems on fractional integration. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India, A 36, no 4, 1007-1012. 2) {1968) On the solution of certain integral equations of convolution type. A cta Mezic. cienc. 11 tecnol., 2, no 2, 85-87. 3) {1969) Fractional integration operators involving generalized hypergeometric functions, II. 16id., 3, no 1, 1-5.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
901
4) (1969) Integral operators involving Fox's H-function. 16itl., 3, no 3, 117-122. 5) (1969) Some theorems on fractional integration, II. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India, A 39, no 1, 49-56. 6) (1970) Fractional integration operators involving generalized hypergeometric functions. Re'tl. Uni'fl. Nac. Tucumtin, A 20, no 1-2, 93-100. 7) (1970-1971) On operators of fractional integration. Matl&. Notae, 22, no 1-2, 89-93. 8) (1971) Some generalized theorems of fractional integration. Re'tl. Uni'fl. Nac. Tucumtin, A 21, no 1-2, 235-239. 9) (1972) On the solution of an integral equation involving a kernel of Mellin-Bamea type integral. KJ•ngpooi Matl&. J., 12, no 1 , 93-101. 10) (1975) On an integral equation of electrostatic problems. Met•. J. Pure antl Appl. Sci., 8, no 3, 291-294. 11) (1976) On operators of fractional integration, II. Matl&. Notae, 25, 29-35. 12) (1960) Operators of fractional integration. Lect. Note. Matl&., '798 , 258-280.
and Kiryakova, V.S. 1) (1990) A generalized fractional calculus dealing with H-functions. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Fractional Calcul•• and ita Appl. (Tokyo, 1989), ed. K. Nishimoto. Tokyo: Coli. Engin. Nihon Univ., 62--69. Kalla, S.L. and Saxena, R.K. 1) (1969) Integral operators involving hypergeometric functions. Matl&. Z., 108, no 3, 231-234. 2) (1974) Integral operators involving hypergeometric functions, II. Re'tl. Uni'fl. Nac.
Kalla, S.L.
Tuc•mtin, A 24:, 31-36.
Kapilevich, M.B. 1) (1966) Confluent hypergeometric Horn functions (Russian). Differen t.ial'nJe Ura'flneniya, 2, no 9, 1239-1254. 2) (1967) Singular Cauchy and 1iicomi problema (Russian). DoH. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1 '7'7, no 6, 1265-1268. 3) (1966) A certain class of hypergeometric functions of Horn (Russian). Differenbial'nye Ura'tlneniya, 4:, no 8, 1465-1483. 4) (1969) The solution of iterated Cauchy problema in basis aeries (Russi an). Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 185, no 1, 28-31 .
The Wiener-Hop£ integral equation with the symbol having a of fractional order (Rulllian). Differef&taial'nJe Ura'tlnef&iJa, 13, no 8, 1471-1476 Karapetyants, N.K., Murdaev, H.M. and Yakubov, A.Ya. 1) (1990) On isomorphism between generalized Holder classes realized by fractional integrals (Russian). DoH. Akatl. Nad SSSR, 314:, no 2, 288-291. Karapetyants, N .K. and Rubin, B.S. 1) (1982) Riesz radial potentials on the disc and fractional integration operators (Russian). 16id., 263, no 6, 1299-1- 302. {Tranal. in So'tliet Matl&. Dokl., 25 (1982), no 2, 522-525}. 2) (1984) Operators of fractional integration in spaces with a weight (Russian). lz'fl. Akad. Nauk A rmJan. SSR, Ser. Mat., 19, no 1, 31-43. 3) ( 1985) Local properties of fractional integrals and the BMO spaces on the segment of real axis (Russian). Rostov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI 06.02.86, no 669-B, 43 p. 4) (1986) Integral equations of the first .kind with a weak singularity with a radial right-hand side (Russian). In Diff. antl integral equat. and complez analyaia. Elista: Kalmytak. Goe. Univ., 87-108. 5) (1988) Fractional integrals with the limiting exponent (Russian). (Russian). lzv. V,ul&. Ucl&ebn. Za'tletl. Mat., no 3, 69-72 {Transl. in Soviet Matl&. (lz. VUZ), 1966, 32, no 3, 98-102}. Karapetyants and N.K., Samko S.G. 1) (1975) Singular convolution operators with a discontinuous symbol (Russian ). Sibirak. Mat. Z., 16, no 1, 44--61 . {Transl. in Siberian Matl&. J. 1 6 (1975), no 1, 35-48}.
Karapetyants, N.K. 1) (1977) zero
902
BIBLIOGRAPHY
2) (1975) Singular integral operators with the Carlemanian shift in the case of piecewise continuous coefficients, I (Russian). lzv. Vr••h. Uchebn. Za.v. Ma.t. no 2, 43-54. Karasev, I.M. 1) (1957) On the question of the integrating one type of degenerating hypergeometric equation (Russian) . In Uchen. Za.p. Kda.rdino-Ba.lka.r•k. Ped. ln•t., Nal'chik: Kabardin"Ba.lkank. Izdat., Vyp. 17, 29-36. Kashin, B.S. and Saakyan, A.A. 1) (1984) Orthogona.l •erie• (Russian). Moscow: Naulca, 494 p. Kato, T. 1) (1956) Perturbation theory for nullity, deficiencies and other quantities of linear operators. J. .Ana.lr•e Ma.th., 6 , no 2, 261-322. 2) (1960) Note on fractional powers of linear operators. Proc. Ja.pa.n. .Aca.d. Sci., A 36, 94-96. 3) (1961) Fractional powers of dissipative operators. J. Ma.th. Soc. Ja.pa.n., 1 3, no 3, 24�274. 4) {1962) Fractional powers of dissipative operators, II. 16id., 14, no 2, 242-248. Katsaras, A. and Liu, D. 1) (1975) Sur les derivees fractionna.ires des fonctions periodiques. C. R. .Aca.d. •ci. Pa.ri•, 281, no 9, A265-A268. Kaul, C.L. 1) (1971) On fractional integration operators of functions of two variables. Pr_oc. Na.t. .A ca.tl. Sci. lntlia., A 41 , no 3-4, 233-240. Kelland, P. 1) (1840) On general differentiation, I and II. 7ra.n•. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 14, 567-603 and 604-618. 2) (1849) On general differentiation, Ill. lbitl., 16, no 2-3, 241-303. 3) (1850-1851) On a process in the differential calculus, and its application to the solution of certain differential equations. 16id., 20, no 1, 39-55. Kerman , R. and Sawyer, E. 1) (1985) Weighted norm inequalities for potentials with applications to ScbrOdinger operators, Fourier transfonns, and Carleson measures. B•ll. .Amer. Ma.th. Soc., 12, no 1, 112-116. Kesarwani, R.N. -(Narain Roop) 1) (1959) A Fourier kernel Ma.th. Z., 70, no 4, 297-299. 2) (1962) The G-functiona as unsymmetrical Fourier kernel, I. Proc. .Amer. Ma.th. Soc., 13, no 6, 9�959. 3) (1963) The G-function as unsymmetrical Fourier kernels, II. Ibid., 14, no 1, 16-28. 4) (1963) The G-function as unsymmetrical Fourier kernels, III. 16itl., 14, no 1, 271-277. 5) (1965) A pair of unsymmetrical Fourier kernels. 7h&n• .A mer. Ma.th. Soc., 1 1 5, no 3, 356-369. 6) (1967) Fractional integration and certain dual equations. Ma.th. Z., 98, 83-88 . 7) (1971) On an integral transform involving G-functions. SIA M J. .Appl. Ma.th., 20 , no 1, 93-98. •
Khan, M .A. 1) (1972) An algebraic study of certain q-fractional integrals and q-derivatives. Ma.th. St•tlent, 40, 442-446. Khan, M .A. and Khan, A.B. 1) (1966) Fractional q-integration and integral representations of "bibasic" double bypergeometric series of higher order. .Acta math. Vietaam, 1 1 , no 2 , 234-240. Khandekar, P.R. 1) (1965) On a convolution transform involving generalized Laguerre polynomial as its kernel. J. math. pne• et appl., 44, no 2, 195-197. Kilbas, A.A. 1) (1975) Power-logarithmic integrals in spaces of Holder functions (Russian). Vut•i Akad. Nank BSSR, Ser. Fiz.-Ma.t. Navd, no 1, 37-43. 2) (1976) Application of a certain integral representation in studying the Noethericity of integral operaton with logarithmic kernels (Russian) . 16id., no 2, 24-33.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
903
3) (1976) The Noethericity of integral operators with logarithmic kernels (Russian). 16itl., no 4, 35-39. 4) (1976) Generalized HOlder spaces and an operator of convolution type with a special Volterra function (Russian). 16itl., no 5, 44-52. 5) (1977) Integral equations of the first kind with logarithmic kernels of arbitrary order (Russian) . Doil. Ahtl. NaniJ: BSSR, 21, no 12, 1078-1081. 6) (1978) Operators of potential type with power-logarithmic kernels in Holder spaces with weight (Russian). Vubi Ahtl. Navv.IJ: BSSR, Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Navd, no 2, 29-37. 7) (1979) Operators of potential type with logarithmic kernels of 81'bitrary nonnegative orders (Russian). Izv. Vr••h. Uchebn. Zavetl. Mat., no 1, 28-37. {Transl. in Soviet Mat. (Izv. VUZ), 23 (1979), no 1, 22-29}. 8) (1982) Asymptotic expansions for power-logarithmic integrals containing logarithms (Russian) . Ve.ui Ahtl. Navv.IJ: BSSR, Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Navd, no 6, 29-36. 9) (1983) Smoothness of multidimensional operators of potential type over a bounded domain (Russi an). Izv. Vyuh. Uchebn. Zavetl. Mat., no 6, 58-61. {Transl. in Soviet Mat. (Izv VUZ), 27 (1983), no 6, 73-76}. 10) (1984) Integral equations with logarithmic kernels (Russian). In Proc. Intern. Conf. Complez A nalr•i• antl A ppl., 81 (V81'na, 1981) , Sofia: Publ. House Bulg. Acad. Sci., 537-546. 11) (1985) Integral equations of the first kind with logarithmic kernels (Russian). In Proc. commemorative •eminar on bov.ntlarr nlue problem (Minsk, 1981) , Minsk: Universitetskoe, 57-64. 12) (1987) On the action of Riesz potential from Lp (Rn ) and the smoothness of integral operators (Russian). Doll. AIJ:atl. Navd BSSR, 31, no 2, 108-111. 13) (1988) Asymptotic expansions of fractional integrals and solutions of Euler-Poisson Darboux equation (Russian). Different.ial'nre Uravneniya, 2-', no 10, 1764-1776. { Transl. in Dif. Eqv.at. 24: (1988), no 10, 1174-1185}. 14) (1990) Asymptotic expansions for fractional integrals and their applications. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Fractional Cale-Klv.• antl it• A ppl. (Tokyo, 1969), ed. K. Nishimoto. Tokyo: Coli. Engin. Nihon Univ., 70-79. 15) (1990) Asymptotic representations of fractional integrals (Russian) . Izv. Vy••h. Uchebn. Zavetl. Mat., no 1, 40-50.
Kilbas, A.A., Saigo M. and Zbuk V.A. 1) (1991) On composition of generalized fractional integration operators with differential operator of axially symmetric potential theory (Russian). Different•ial'nye Uravneniya, 26, no 9, 1650-1652. Kilbas, A.A. and Samko, S.G 1) (1978) The smoothness of functions that are representable by logarithmic integrals (Russian). VutniiJ: Belora.••· Go•. Univ., Ser. 1, no 1 , 73-75. Kilbas, A.A. and Vu Kim Tuan 1) (1982) A multidimensional analogue of Abel's integral equation (Russian) . Doil. Ahtl. Nud BSSR, 26, no 10, 879--88 1. Kim Hong Ob 1) (1934) Derivatives of Blaschke products. Pa.if. J. Math., 1 14:, no 1, 175-190. 2) (1986) On a theorem of Hardy and Littlewood on the polydisc. Proc. Am er. Math. Soc., 97, no 3, 403-409.
Kim Yong Chan 1) (1990) Some properties of rp-fractional integrals. In Proc. Intern. Con/. Fractional Calcv.lv.• antl it• Appl. (Tokyo, 1989), ed. K. Nishimoto. Tokyo: Coli. Engin. Nihon Univ . , 80-84. King, L.V. 1) (1935) On the acoustic radiation pressure on circular discs: Inertia and diffraction corrections. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A, 153, no 878, 1-16. Kipriyanov, I.A. 1) (1959) The fractional derivative and imbedding theorems (Russian). Dokl. A IJ:atl. Nad SSSR, 126, no 6, 1187-1190.
904
BffiLIOGRAPHY
2) (1960) The operator of fractional differentiation and the powers of elliptic operators (Russian) . 16id., 131, no 2, 238-241. 3) (1960) On the spaces of fractionally differentiable functions (Russian). lzv. Ak4d. Nad SSSR, Ser. Mat. , 24:, no 6, 865-882 . 4) (1961) On some inequalities for an operator of fractional differentiation (Ruuian). In St•diu of m odena problem• of con•tr.ctive tleof'J of f-nction•. Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 143-148. 5) {1961) On some properties of the fractional derivative by direction (Russian). Izv. Vr••"· Uclebn. Znetl. Mat., no 2, 32-40. Sa) (1962) On complete continuity of the imbedding operators in the spaces of fractionally differentiable functions (Ruuian). U•peli Mat. Nad:, 1T, Vyp. 2, 183-189. 6) (196T) Fourier-Bessel transfonna and imbedding theorems for weight classes (Russian). 7nldr Mat. ln•t. Steklot1, 89, 130-213 {Transl. in Proc. Ste1lot1 ln•t. Mat1., 1967, 89, 149-248 {1968)}. 7) (1967) On an operator generated by the Fourier-Bessel transform (Russi an). Si6ir•1. Mat. Z., 8, no 3, 601-620.
Kipriyanov, I.A. and Ivanov, L.A. 1) {1986) Riesz potentials on Lorentz spaces (Russian). Mat. 56. (N.S. ), 1 30 , no 4, 465-474. {Transl. in Mat1. USSR, 56. 58 (1967), no 2, 467-475} .
Kiryakova, V.S. 1) {1986) On operators of fractional integration involving Meijer's G-function. C. R. A cad. B•lf. Sci., 39, no 10, 25-28. 2) {1988) A generalized fractional calculus and integral transfonna. In Generalized F•nction•, Oont1e7Jence Str.ct•re• and Tleir Appl. Eda. B . Stankovic, E. Pap, S. Pilipovic, V.S. Vladimirov. New York, London: Plenum Press , 205-217. 3) (1988} Generalized n;:;;�-function fractional integration operators in some classes of analytio functions. In Proc. 3 lntera. Srmp. (Herteeg-Novy, 1986), Matem. Ve•nik, Y•1o•lawia, .0, no 3-4, 259-266. Kishore, N. and Botta, G.C. 1) (1972) On absolute Norlund summability of a Fourier series. A nnal. Unit1. Un Timi•oana. Serie• tinte Matl., 10, Fasc. 2, 171-182.
Klyuchanteev, M.I. 1) (1976) Integrals of fractional order and aingular boundary value problems (Ruuian). Differenuial'nre Unat�ne•ira, 12, no 6, 983-990.
Kober, H. 1) {1940) On fractional integrals and derivatives. Q•art. J. Math., Ozfortl •er., 1 1 , DO 43 , 193-211. 2) (1941) On a theorem of Sclmr and on fractional integrals of purely imaginary order. Tr.••· Amer. Matl. Soc., 50, no 1, 160-174. 3) (1941) On Dirichlet's aingular integral and Fourier transforms. Q•art. J. Mat1., Ozfortl •er., i2, no 46, 76--85. 4) (1961} On certain lineal' operations and rellations between them. Proc. London Matl. Soc., Ser. 3, 1 1, no 43, 434-458. 5) (1967) A modification of Hilbert transforms, the Weyl integral and functional equations. J. London Math. Soc., 4:2, no 1, 42-50. 6) (1968) The extended Weyl integral and related operations. Proc. Amer. Matl. Soc., 19, no 2, 285-291. 7} (1970) New propertiea of the Weyl extended integral. Proc. London Mat1. Soc., Ser. 3, 21, DO 3, 557-575. Kochubel, A.M. 1) {1989} Parabolic pseudodifl'erential equations, hypersingular integrals and Markov processes (Ruuian). !Ztl. Ahd. Nad SSSR, Ser. Mat., 52 , no 5, 909-934 {Transl. in Mat1. USSR, Izv., 1989, 33, no 2, 233-259}. 2) {1989) Cauchy problem for equations of fractional order (Russian). Different•ial'nre Una•nenira, 25, no 8, 1359-1368.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
905
3) (1990) Diffusion of fractional order. (Russian). J6id., 26, no 4, 660--670. Kochura, A.I. and Didenko, A.V. 1 ) ( 1985) On the solution of the differential equation of fractional order with piecewise constant coefficients (Russian). Odessa, Dep. in Ukrain. NIINTI 29.04.85, no 855, 13 p. Koeller, R.C. 1 ) ( 1986) Polynomial operators, Stieltjes convolution and fractional calculus in hereditary mechanics. Acta Mech., 58, 251-264. Kofanov, V.A. 1 ) ( 1987) Approximation by algebraic polynomials of classes of functions which are fractional integrals of sununable functions (Russian). Anal. Math., 13, no 3, 21 1-229.
Kogan, H.M. 1 ) ( 1964) On an integro-differential equation (Russian) . Uapehi Mat. Nauk, 19, no 4, 228-230. 2 ) ( 1965 ) On the order of approximation of functions in the space Za by the linear positive polynomial operators (Russian). In Studiea on modern problem• of conatructive theo7"11 of Jun ction•, Baku: lzdat. Akad. Nauk Azerb. SSR, 157-162. Koh, E.L . and Conlan, J. 1 ) ( 1976) Fractional derivatives, Laplace transforms and association of variables. Intern. J. Sy1tem. Sci., 7, no 5, 591-596. Koizumi, S. 1 ) ( 1957) On fractional integration. Tohoku Math. J., 9, no 3, 298-306.
Kokilashvili, V.M. 1 ) ( 1978) Anisotropic Bessel potentials. An hnbedding theorem with a limiting exponent (Russian). In Que•t. of the theof'1/ of Junction• and math. phya. Trudy T6ili••· Mat. ln1t. Razmadze Akad. Nauk Gruzin. SSR, 58, 134-149. 2 ) ( 1985) Maximal functions and singular integrals in weighted function spaces (Russian). 16id., 80, 114 p. 3) ( 1985) Maximal functions and integrals of potential type in weighted Lebesgue and Lorentz spaces (Russian). Trw.dy Mat. ln1t. Steklov, 172, 192-201 . 4 ) ( 1985 ) Singular' and fractional integrals in weight spaces (Russian). In Report• of the extended 1e11ion1 of a 1eminar of the I.N. Veha ln.t. Appl. Math. (Tbilissi, 1985 ) . Tbiliss. Gos. Univ., l, no 2, 8�. 5 ) ( 1987) Weighted estimates for maximal functions and fractipnal integrals in Lorentz spaces (Russian) . Trw.dy T6ili••· Mat. Inat. Razmadze Akad. Nauk Gruzin. SSR, 86, 74-85 6) ( 1987) Weighted inequalities for maximal functions and fractional integrals in Lorentz spaces. Math. Nachr., 133, 33-42. 7) ( 1989) Fractional integrals on curves (Russian) . Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 305, no 1, 33-35. 8) ( 1989) Fractional integrals on curves (Russian). Trudy T6iliaa. Mat. lnat. Razmadze A kad. Nauk Gruzin. SSR, 98, 56-70. 9) ( 1969 ) Anisotropic potentials an:d singular integrals with weak singulal"ity on curves (Russian). Soo61h ch. Akad. Nauk. Gruzin. SSR, 135, no 3, 465--467. 10 ) ( 1990) Weighted norm inequalities for classical integral operators. In Nonlinear analyaia, Junction apace• and application•, 4, Proc. Spring School held in Rudnice, Teubner-Texte zur Mathematik. 11 ) (1991 ) On weight problem for the integrals with positive kernels (Russian) . Bull. Georgian A cad. Sci., 141, no 1. Kokilashvili, V.M . and Gabidzashvili, M.A. 1 ) ( 1985 ) Weighted inequalities for anisotropic potentials and maximal functions (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 282 , no 6, 1304-1306 {Transl. in Soviet Math. Dokl., 1985, 3 1 , 583-585} . 2 ) ( 1989) Two weight weak-type inequalities for fractional type integrals. Ceakoal. Akad. Ved. Mat. flatav., no 45, 11 p. Kokilashviii, V.M. and Krbec, M. 1 ) ( 1984 ) Weight norm inequalities for fractional order maximal functions and Riesz potentials in Orlicz spaces. J6id., 1-17.
906
BIBLIOGRAPHY 2) (1984) On the boundedness of Riesz potentials and fractional maximal functions in weighted Orlicz spaces. In Proc. Intem. Conf. Con•tM£ctive Tla.eorr of F•nction•, 84 (Varna, 1984), Sofia: Publ. House Bulg. Acad. Sci., 468-472. 3) {1985) Weighted inequalities for Riesz potentials and fractional maximal functions in Orlicz spaces (Ruasian). Doil. ...t icul. Nad SSSR, 283, no 2, 280-283. {Transl. in Sotliet Mat/a.. Doil. 32 (1985), no 1, 7G-73}. 4) {1986) On the boundedness of anieotropic fractional maximal functions and potentials in weighted Orlicz spaces (Ruasian). 'lntlr T6ili••· Mat. In•t. Razmatlze Aiatl. Na•i GM£zit&. SSR, 82, 106-115.
Kokilashvili, V.M. and Kufner, A. 1) (1989) Fractional integrals on spaces of homogeneous type. Cuiul. Ahtl. VU. Mat. U•tav., no 44, 17 p. 2) (1989) Fractional integrals on spaces of homogeneous t� . Comment. Mat/a.. Univ. Carolinae, 30 , no 3, 511-523. Kolmogorov, A.N. and Fomin, S.V. 1) {1968) F•ntlamental• of tla.e tla.eorr of j.nction• anti f-nctional analr•i• (Russian). Moecow: Nauka, 496 p. · Komatsu, H. 1) {1966) Fractional powers of operators, I. Pacif. J. Mat/a.., 1 9, no 2, 285-346. 2) (1967) Fractional powers of operators, IT: Interpolation spaces. 16itl., 21, no 1, 89-111. 3) (1969) Fractional powers of operators, Ill: Negative powen. J. Mat/a.. Soc. Ja-p.. n ., 2 1 , no 2, 205-220. 4) {1969) Fractional powers of operators, IV: Potential operators. 16itl., 221-226. 5) {1970) Fractional powers of operators, V: Dual operators. J. Fa•. Sci. Univ. Toiro, Sec. lA, 17, 373-396. 6) (1972) Fractional powers of operators, VI: Interpolation of non-negative operaton and imbedding theorems. 16itl., 19, no 1 , 1-63. 7) { 1975) Generalized Poill80n integrals and regularity of functions. In Proc. Intern. Conf. FnJctional Calc•l•• &J&tl it• Appl. (New Haven, 1974), ed. B. Roes, Lect. Notu Matl., 457, 232-248. Komatu, Y. 1) (1961) On fractional angular derivative. Kotlai Mat/a.. Sem. Rep., 13, no 4, 249-254. 2) {1967) On mean distortion for analytic functions with positive real part in a circle. Nc1or• Mat/a.. J., 29, 221-228. 3) (1979) On a one-parameter additive family of operators defined on analytic functions :regular in the unit disc. B•ll. Fac. Sci. En1n1. Cla.•o Univ., 22, 1-22. 4) {1985) On the ranse of analytic functions related to CMatheodory class . Ann. polon. met/a.., 46, 141-145. 5) {1986) On oscillation in a class of analytic functions related to fractional integration. In Proc. I•tem. Con/. Complu Analr•i• cntl Appl. '85 (VMDa, 1985), Sofia: Publ. House Bulg. Acad. Sci., 327-334. 6) (1987) On a family of integral operators related to fractional calculus. Kotlai Mat/a.. J., 10, no 1, 2G-38. 7) {1987) On the range of values of analytic functions relating to a family of integral operators. Mat. Vunii, 39, no 4, 399-404 . Komori, Y. 1) {1983) The factorization of HP and the commutaton. Toiro J. Mat/a.., 6, no 2, 435-445. Korobeinik, Yu.F. 1 ) {1964) On equations of infinite order in generalized derivatives (Russian). Si6ir•i. Mat. Z., 5, no 6, 1259-1261. 2) {1964) Generali� differentiation operations applied to an arbitrMy analytic function (Ruasian). In. Ah�. Nad SSSR, Ser. Mat., 28, no 4, 833-854 . 3) {1965) On a certain integral operator (Russian). Litov•i. Mat. S6., 5, no 1, 97-115. 4) (1983) Tla.e d.ift openJtor• on tla.e n•m6er •et• (Ruasian). Rostov on-Don: lzdat. Roetov. Univ., 155 p.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
907
Kosarev, E.L. 1) (1973) On the numerical solution of the Abel integral equation (Russian). Z. Vycla.ial. Mat. i Mat. Fiz., 13, no 6, 1591-1596.
Koschmieder, L. 1) (1949) F\mktionales Rechnen mit allgemeinen Ableitungen. Anz. Dater. Akad. Wiaa. Math..-Nat-ar. Kl., 86, no 13, 241-244. 2) (1949) Verallgemeinerte Ableitungen und hypergeometrische F\mktionen. Monabh.. Math.., 53, 169-183.
Koshljakov, N.S., Gliner, E.B. and Smirnov, M.M. 1) (1970) Differential Eq•ation• of Mathematical PAyaica (Russian). Moscow: Vysshaya shlrola, 710 p. (Engl. transl. in Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ. Co., 1984, 701 p.).
Kostitzin, V. 1) (1947) Sur une generalisation de !'equation integrale d'Abel. C. R. A cad. aci., Paria, 224, no 12, 885-887.
Kostometov, G.P. 1) (1990) On the properties of Abel integral operators (Russian). In Mezh.vuzov. d. "Problemy mat. anal.", Vyp. 11, Nelin. tnuvneniya i variab. neravenatva, lin. operator, i apdtr. teoriya, ed. N.N. Ural'tseva. Leningrad: lzdat. Leningrad. Univ., 187-191.
Kralik, D. 1) (1956) Untersuchung der Integrale und Derivierten gebrochener Ordnung mit den Methoden der konstruktiven F\mktiontheorie. A cta Math.. Acad. Sci. H•ng., 7, no 1 , 49-64.
Krantz, S.G. 1) (1982) Fractional integration on Hardy spaces. Stud. Math., 73, no 2, 87-94.
Krasnosel'skii, M.A. and Rutitskii, Ya.B. 1) (1958) Conve:c function• and Orlicz apace• (Russian). Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 271 p.
Krasnosel'skii, M.A. and Sobolevskii, P.E. 1) (1959) Fractional powers of operators in Banach spaces (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nad SSSR, 1 29, no 3, 499-502. Krasnosel'skii, M.A., Zabreiko, P.P., Pustyl'nik, E.I., Sobolevskii, P.E. 1) (1968) Integral OpertJtora in apace• of ••mmdle f'anction• (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 499 p.
Krasnov, V.A. 1) (1976) Fractional derivatives of functions of several variables (Russian). In Bo•ndary val•e problema of the electrodynamic• of conducting media. Kiev: lzdanie Inst. Mat. Akad. Nauk Ukrain. SSR, 240-243. 2) (1977) The fractional derivative of a function with respect to another function (Russian). In NaucAn. Tr•dy Taah.kent. Goa. Univ., no 548: Voproay Mat., 58--61 .
Krasnov, V.A. and Foht, A.S. 1) (1975) Integral estimates for fractional derivatives of the solutions of linear elliptic type equations in the L2 metric, I (Russian). Differenbia.l'n11e Uravneniya, 1 1 , no 6, 1042-1053. Krein, M.G. 1) (1955) On a new method of solution of linear integral equations of the first and second kinds (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Na•k SSSR, 1 00, no 3, 413-416.
Krein, S.G. 1) (1971) Linear equation• in a Banach. apace (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 104 p.
Krein, S.G., Petunin, Yu.I. and Semenov, E.M. 1) (1976) Interpolation of linear operator• (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 400 p. Krepkogorskii, V.L. 1) (1980) Counter-examples to the theory of the operators in the spaces with mixed norm (Russian). Kazan, Dep. in VINITI 1 1.07.80, no 2963, 11 p.
Krivenkov, Yu.P. 1) (1957) A representation of solutions of Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation by analytic functions (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nad SSSR, 116, no 4, 545-548. Krug, A. 1 ) (1890) Theorie der Derivationen. Math..-Nat.r. Kl., 57, 151-226.
Akad.
Wiu.
Wien, Denkenach.riften.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
908
Kudryavtsev, D.L. 1) {1982) Fourier series of functions which have a fractional-logarithmic derivative (Russi an). Dokl. Ahtl. Nn.A: SSSR, 266, no 2, 274-276.
Kumbhat, R.K. 1) {1976) An inversion fonnula for an integral transfonn. Intlian J. P.re antl A ppl. Mat/a., 7, no 4, 368-375. Kumbhat, R.K. and Saxena, R.K. 1) {1975) Theorems connecting L, L - l and fractional integration operators. Proc. Nat. A catl. Sci. Intlia, 45 A, no 3, 205-209. Kumykova, S.K. 1) {1974) A certain problem with nonlocal boundary conditions on the characteristics for an equation of mixed type (Russian). Differenbial'nre Uravnenira, 10, no 1, 78-88. 2) {1980) A boundary value problem with shift for a hyperbolic equation that is degenerate inside the domain (Russian). 16itl., 16, no 1 , 93-104. {Transl. in Dij. Equal. 16 {1980), no 1 , 68-77}. 3) {1981) A problem with nonlocal conditions on dtaracteristics for a hyperbolic equation that degenerates inside the domain (Russian). 16itl., 1 7, no 1 , 81-90. {'Iransl. in Dij. Equat. 17 {1981), no 1 , 55-61}. Kurokawa, T. 1) {1981) On the Riesz and Bessel kernels as aproximations of the identity. Sci. Repb. Kago•laima Univ., 30, 31-45. 2) {1988) Riesz potentials, higher Riesz transforms and Beppo Levi spaces. Hiro•/aima Mat/a. J., 18, 541-597. 3) (1988) Weighted nonn inequalities for Riesz potentials. Japan J. Mat/a., 14, no 2, 261-274. Kurokawa, T. and Mizuta, Y. 1) {1979) On the order at infinity of Riesz potentials. Hiro•/aima Mat/a. J., 9, 533-545. Kuttner, B. 1) (1953) Some theorems on fractional derivatives. Proc. Lontlon Mat/a. Soc., Ser. 3, 3, no 12, 480-497.
Kuttner, B. and Tripathy, N. 1) (1971) An inclusion theorem for Hausdorff summability method associated with fractional integrals. Qwart. J. Mat/a., Ozfortl •er., 22, no 86, 299-308.
Kuvshinnikova, I.L. 1) {1988) Modified byperaingular integrals and its application to the operators of potential type with difference radial characteristics (RU88ian). lzv. Vr••la. Ucladn. Zuetl. Mat., 4 , 76-79. Lacroix, S.F. 1) {1820) Traiti tlw cal cui tlifferentiel et tlw calcwl integral. 3 ed. Paris: Courcier. Lamb, W. 1) {1984) Fractional powers of operators defined on a Frechet space. Proc. Etlinhrgla Mat/a. Soc., 27, no 2, 165-180. 2) (1985) A distributional theory of fractional calculus. Proc. Ror. Soc. Etlinhrgla, A 99, no 3-4, 347-357. 3) (1985) Fractional calculus via fractional powers of operators. In Fractional Calcwl·u, eds. A.C. McBride, G .F. Roach, Boston: Pitman Adv. Publ. Progr., Ru. Notu Mat/a., 1 38, 49--62. 4) {1986) Fourier multipliers on spaces of distnoutions. Proc. Etlinhrgla Mat/a. Soc., 29, no 3, 309-327. Lamb, W. and McBride, A.C. 1) {1963) On relating two approadtes to fractional calculus. J. Mat/a. A nal. antl Appl., 132, no 2, 590-610.
Lambe, C.G. 1) {1939) no 2 , 75-77.
An
infinite integral fonnula. Proc. Etlin6wrgla Mat/a. Soc., Ser. �, 6 ,
Landkof, M .S . 1) {1966) Fowntlation• of Motlern Potential Tlaeorr (Russian). Moscow: Naub, 515 p. (Transl. in New York, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1972, 424 p.).
BIBLIOGRAPHY
909
Lanford, O.E. and Robinson, D.M. 1) {1989) Fractional powers of equicontinuous semigroups and fractional derivatives. J. Auatral. Math. Soc., A, 46, no 3, 473-504. Laplace, P.S. 1) {1812) Theorie analytique dea probdilitea. Paris: Courcier. Laurent, H. 1) {1884) Sur le calcul des derivees a indices quelconques. Nouv. Ann. Math., 3 , no 3 , 24G--252. Lavoie, J.L., Osler, T.J. and Tremblay, R. 1) (1976) Fractional derivatives and special functions. SIAM Rev., 18, no 2, 24G--268. Lavoie, J.L., Tremblay, R. and Osler, T.J. 1) {1975) Fundamental properties of fractional derivatives via Pochhamem r integrals. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Fractional C41culua and ita Appl. (New Haven, 1974), ed. B. Ross, Lect. Note• Math., 457, 323-356. Lebedev, N.N. 1) (1948) On application of the singular integral equations to the problem of distribution of the electricity on the thin non-closed surfaces (Russian) . Z. Tekhn. Fiz., 18, Vyp. 6, 775-784. 2) {1957) Distribution of the electricity on the thin. paraboloidal segment (Russian). Dokl. A k4d. Nauk SSSR, 1 14, no 3, 513-516. 3) (1963) Special Function• and Their AppliC4tiona (Russian). Moscow, Leningrad: Fizmatgiz, 358 p. (Transl. in New York: Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood, Cliff, 1965). Lebedev, N.N. and Skal'skaya, I.P. 1) (1969) The solution of a class of dual integral equations connected with the Mehler-Fock transform on the theory of elasticity and mathematical physics (Russian) . Prikl. m4t. i m eh., 33, Vyp. 6, 1061-1066 {Transl. in J. Appl. Math. Meek., 1969 {1970), 33, 102�1036}. Lebedev, N.N. and Uilyand, Ya.S. 1) {1958) Axial-symmetric contact problem for an elastic layer (Russian) . Ibid., 22 . Vyp. 3, 32G--326. Leibniz, G.W. 1 ) {1853) Leibniz an de !'Hospital (Letter from Hannover, Germany, September 30, 1695). In Oeuvrea Mathim4tiquea de Leibniz. Correapondance de Leibniz avec Hugena, van Zulichem et le Marquia de L 'Hoapit41. P. 1. vol. 2. Paris: Libr. de A . Franck, 297-302. 2) (1962) Leibniz an Wallis (Letter, May 26, 1697). In Leibnizena Mathem4tiache Schriften. Vol. 4. Hildesheim: Olms Veri., 23-29. Leont'ev, A.F. 1) {1983) Entire functiona. Seriea of exponentials (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 176 p. Leray, J. 1) {1953) Hyperbolic Differential equ4tiona. Princeton: Inst. Adv. Study, 238 p. (Russian ed. in Moscow: Nauka, 1984, 206 p.). Leskovskii, I.P. 1 ) (1980) On the solution of the linear homogeneous differential equations with fractional derivatives and constant coefficients (Russian). In Some queationa of diff. equ4t. in the solution of appl. problema. Tula: Tul'sk. Politech. Inst., 85--86. Letnikov, A.V. 1) {1868) Theory of differentiation with an arbitrary index (Russian). Mat. Sb., 3, 1-66. 2) (1868) On historical development of differentiation theory with an arbitrary index (Russian). Ibid., 3, 85-1 12. 3) (1872) On explanation of the main propositions of differentiation theory with an arbitrary index (Russian). Ibid., 6, Vyp. 1, 413--445. 4} {1874) Investigations on the theory of integrals of the form (Russian). Ibid., 7, Vyp. 1, 5-205. 5) {1874) Recherches relatives a la theorie des integrales de la forme Bull. Sci. Math. Aatron. J., 7, 233-238.
X
j(x - u)P-1 f(u)du a
X
j(x - u)P-1 f(u)du.
a
910
BffiLIOGRAPHY
6) (1882) New investigations about trigonometric functions (Russi an). Mat. Sb., 10, Vyp. 1-4, 227-312. 7) (1884) On the definite integrals which contain functions satisfing the hypergeometric equation (Russian). Ibid., 11, Vyp. 3, 327-414. 8) {1885) On hyperspherical functions and on the expansions of arbitrary function in a series of hyperspherical functions (Russian). Ibid., 1 2 , Vyp. 2, 205--282. r� + (a -t + b -tr) z • -· ,• + 9) (1888) On the integration of the equation (an + bn x) aza n n · · · + (ao + box)y = 0 (Russian). Ibid., 1 •, Vyp. 1, 205-215. 10) (1888) On hypergeometric functions of higher order (Russian) . Ibid., 1 •, Vyp. 1, 216-222. 11) (1888) On the reduction of multiple integrals (Russian). Ibid., 1•, Vyp. 1, 303-328. Levitan, B.M. 1) (1951) Expansions in Fourier series and integrals with Bessel functions (Russian). U•pehi Mat. Nault, 6, no 2, 102-143 Lewy, H. 1) (1952) A theory of terminals and reflection laws of partial differential equations. ONR Tech. Rep. Stanford Uni11., no 4. 2) {1959) On the reflection laws of second order partial differential equations in two independent variables. Bdl. Amer. Math. Soc., 65, no 2, 37-58. Lieb, B.H. 1) (1983) Sharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev and related inequalities. A nn. Math., 1 1 8 , no 2, 349-374. Linchuk, N.E. 1) (1985) Representation of commutants of the generalized Gel'fond-Leont'ev integration operator (Russian). lz11. Vruh. Uchebn. Za11etl. Mat., no 5, 72-74. Linker, A.I. and Rubin, B.S. 1) (1981) Theorems on contraction, continuation and sewing for the images of convolution operators with power-logarithmic kernels on the finite segment (Russian). Rostov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI 18.06.81, no 2919, 12 p. Lions, J .L. 1) (1959) Sur I'existence de solutions des equations de Navier-Stokes. C. R. A cad. •ci. Pari•, 2•8, no 20, 2647-2849.
Lions, J.L. and Peetre, J . 1) (1964) Sur une classe d'espaces d'interpolation. ln•t. Haute• Etutle• Sci. Pub/. Math., 19, 5-66. Liouville, J. 1) (1832) Memoire sur quelques questions de geometrie et de mecanique, et sur un nouveau genre de calcul pour resoudre ces questions. J. /'Ecole Ror. Polrtechn., 13, Sect. 21 , 1-69. 2) (1832) Memoire sur le calcul des differentielles a indices quelconques. 16itl., 71-162. 3) (1832) Memoire sur !'integration de }'equation: ( mx2 + nx + p)d2 y/dz2 + (qx + pr)dy/dz + ay = 0 a I'aide des differentielles indices quelconques. Ibid., 163-186. 4) (1834) Memoire sur le theoreme des fonctions complementaires. J. fir reine und ungew. Math., 1 1 , 1-19. 5) (1834) Memoire sur une formule d'analyse. Ibid., 12, no 4, 273-287. 6) (1835) Memoire sur l'usage que l'on peut faire de Ia formule de Fourier, dans le calcul des differentielles a indices quelconques. 16id., 13, no 1-3, 219-232. 7) (1835) Memoire sur le changement de Ia variable independante dans le calcul des differentielles indices quelconques. J. /'Ecole Ror. Polrtichn., 15, Sect. 24, 17-54. 8) (1837) Memoire sur !'integration des equations differentielles a indices fractionnaires. lbitl., 15, no 55, 58-84. ·
Liu Gui-Zhong 1) {1989) Characterization of the range of the propagation operator for the spherical reaction-diffusion equation. . Eindho11en Uni11. Techn. Rep. A ppl. and Numer. A nal. RA NA 89-11, 9 p. Liverman, T .P.G. 1) {1964) Generalized FUnctions and Direct Operational Methods. Englewood Cliffs, New Jeraey: Prentice-Hall, Vol. 1, 338 p.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
911
Lizorkin, P.I. 1) (1963) Generalized Liouville differentiation and the functional spaces Lj; (En ) . Imbedding theorems (Russian). Mat. Sb. (N.S.),' 80, no 3 , 325-353. 2) (1964) Functions of Hirschman type and relations between the spaces Bj; (En ) and Lj; (En ) (Russian). 16id., 83, no 4, 505-535. 3) (1965) Bounds for trigonometrical integrals and the Bernstein inequality for fractional derivatives (Russian). lz11. Ahtl. Nad SSSR, Ser. Mat., 29, no 1 , 109-126. r 4) (1968) Generalized Holder spaces B ( lv and their interconnections with the Sobolev p, spaces Lj; (Russian). Sibir•i. Mat. Z., 9, no 5, 1127-1152. 5) (1969) Generalized Liouville differentiations and the multiplier method in the theory of imbeddings of classes of differentiable functions (Russian). Tn.dr Mat. ln•t. Steilo11, 105, 89-167. 6) (1970) Characterization of the spaces Lj; (R") in terms of difference singular integrals (Russian). Mat. Sb. (N.S.), 81, no 1 , 79-91 . 7) (1970) The multipliers for the Fourier ingegrals and the estimates for convolutions in the spaces with mixed norm. Applications (Russian). lz11. Ahtl. Na·d SSSR, Ser. Mat., 34, no 1 , 218--247. 8) (1972) Operators connected with fractional difl'erentation and classes of differentiable functions (Russian). Tn.dy Mat. ln•t. Steilo11, 1 1 7, 212-243. 9) (1972) Generalized HOlder claues of functions in connection with fractional differentia- tion (Russian). 16id., 128, 172-177. 10) (1979) The behaviour of the functions from the Liouville's classes at infinity. On the Riesz's potentials of arbitrary order (Russian). Tn.dr Mat. ln•t. Stdlo11, 150, 174-197. 11) (1980) The behaviour of the functions from the Liouville's classes at infinity (Russian). In Modern problem• of tAe tAeorr of junction•: Mater. 11•e•oruz. •Aiolr (Baku, 1977), Baku: Azerb. Univ., 156-159. Lizorkin, P.I. and Nikol'skii, S.M. 1) (1965) Classification of differentiable function on the base of spaces with dominating mixed derivatives (Russian). T"'d' Mat. !nat. Stdlo11, '1'1, 143-167. Loo, C.-T. 1) (1944) Two tauberian theorems in the theory of Fourier series. Trana. Amer. Ma.tA. Soc., 58, no 3, 508--518. Love, E.R. 1) (1938) Fractional integration and almost periodic functions. Proc. London MatA. Soc., Ser. 2, 44, no 5, 363-397. 2) (1967) Some integral equations involving hypergeometric functions. Proc. Edinburgh Ma.tA. Soc., 15, no 3, 169-198. 3) (1967) Two more bypergeometric integral equations. Proc. Cambridge PAil. Soc., 83, no 4, 1055-1078. 4) (1971) Fractional derivatives of imaginary order. J. London MatA. Soc., Ser. 2, 3, no 2, 241-259. 5) (1972) Two index laws for fractional integrals and derivatives. J. Auatral. MatA. Soc., 14, no 4, 385-410. 6) (1975) A hypergeometric integral equation. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Fractional Calculu• and it. Appl. (New Haven, 1974), ed. B. Ross, Lect. Note• MatA., 45'1, 272-288. 7) (1985) A third index law for fractional integrals and derivatives. In Fractional Calculu•, eds. A.C. McBride, G.F. Roach , Boston: Pitman Adv. Publ. Progr., Re•. Notea MatA., 138, 63-74. 8) (1985) Inversion of the Struve transform. 16id., 75-88. 9) (1985) Inequalities like Opial's inequality. Rocznii naukowo-drdaityczny WSP w Kraiowie. Pr. mat., 9'1, no 11, 109-118. 10) (1986-1987) Lebesgue points of fractional integrals. Real Anal. ExcA., 12, no 1 , 327-336.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
912
11) (1990} Two theorems on Riesz-type fractional integrals. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Fn&ctional Calc•l•• and it. A ppl. (Tokyo, 1969), ed. K. Nishimoto, Tokyo: Coli. Engin. Nihon Umv., 85-93.
Love, E.R. and Young, L .C. 1) (1938) In fractional integration by parts. Proc. London Math. Soc., Ser. 2, 44, 1-35. Love, E.R., Prabhakar, T.R. and Kashyap, N.K. 1) (1982} integral equation. Gla•gow Math. J., 23, no 1 , 31-40.
A confluent hypergeometric
Lowengrub, M. 1) (1976) Systems of Abel type integral equations. In F•nction theoretic m ethod• in diff. eq11.at. Eds. R.P. Gilbert, R.J. Weinacht, Pitman Publ., 277-296.
and Sneddon, I.M. 1) (1962} An axisymmetric boundary value problem of mixed type for a half-space. Proc. Edinhrgh Math. Soc., Ser. 2, 13, no 1, 39-46. 2) (1963} The solution of a pair of dual integral equations. Proc. Gla•gow Math. A ••oc., 6, no 1, 14-18. Lowengrub, M. and Walton, l. 1) (1979) Systems of generalized Abel equations. SIA M J. Lowengrub, M.
Math. A nal., 1 0, no 4, 794-807.
Lowndes, l.S. 1 ) A generalisation of the Erdelyi-Kober operators. Proc. Edin611.rgh Math. Soc. Ser. 2, 17, no 2, 139-148. 2) {1971} Some triple integral equations. Pacif. J. Math., 38, no 2, 515-521 . 3) (1977) On dual and triple integral equations involving modified Bessel functions. A ppl. Anal., 6, no 4, 253-260. 4} (1978} Solution of an integral equation. Gla•gow Math. J., 19, no 1, 69-13. 5) (1979) An application of some fractional integrals. 16id., 20, no 1 , 35-41. 6} (1980) The solution of some integral equations. Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 2, no 1 , 26-33. 7) (1981 ) On some generalisations of the Riemann-Liouville and Weyl fractional integrals and their applioations. Gla•gow Math. J., 22, no 2, 173-180. 8} (1983) Cauchy problems for second order hyperbolic differential equations with constant coefficients. Proc. Edinbrgh Math. Soc., 26, no 3, 307-311. 9} (1985} On some fractional integrals and their applications. 16id., Ser. 2, 28, no 1 , 97-105. 10) (1985) On two new operators of fractional integration. Fractional Calc•l.., eds. A.C. McBride, G.F. Roach. Boeton: Pitman Adv. Publ. Progr., Ru. Note• Math., 138, 87-98. Lowndes, l.S. and Srivastava, H.M. 1 } (1990) Some triple aeries and triple integral equations. J. Math. A nal. and Appl., 1 50, no 1, 181-187.
Fractional linear multistep methods for Abel-Volterra integral equations of the second kind. Math. Comp11.t., 45, no 172, 463-469. 2) (1986} Discretized fractional calculus. SIAM Math. Anal., 1 7, 704-720. Luke, Y.L. 1 ) {1969) Th e Special F11.nction• and Their A pprorimation•. New York: Acad. Press, Vol. 1, 349 p. 2) (1980) The Special Mathematical F11.nction• and Th eir A pprorimation• (Russian). Moecow: Mir, 608 p. Lundgren, T. and Chiang, D. 1} {1967} Solutions of a class of singular integral equations.
Lubich, Ch. 1} {1985}
Liitzen,
l.
Q•art. A ppl. Met/a., 24, no 4, 303-313.
1) (1990) Joseph Liouville, 1609-1882. In St11.diu in the Hi•torr of Mathematic• and Pl&r•ical Science•, Vol. 15, Springer-Verlag, 82� p.
Mackie, A.G. 1) {1965)
A class of integral equ&9ons.
Amer. Math. Month., 72 , no 9, 956-960.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
913
Madhavi Dinge 1 ) { 1978) Composition of fractional integral operator and an operator with Fourier type kernel. B¥1. Un.iv. Bra.sov. , C 20, 3-6. Magarll-D'yaev, G.G. 1 ) ( 1979) The problem of an intennediate derivative (Russian). Ma.t. Za.metki, 25, no 1, 81-96. 2 ) ( 1982) Generalized Sobolev classes and inequalities of Bernstein-Nikol'skii type (Russian). Dokl. Ahd. Na.uk SSSR, 264, no 5, 1066-1069. Magaril-D'yaev, G.G. and Tikhomirov, V.M. 1 ) ( 1981 ) On the Kolmogorov inequality for fractional derivatives on the half-line. An.a.l. Math.., 7, no 1, 37-47. 2 ) ( 1984) Some questions of hannonic analysis on T" x R" (Russian). In Some problems in. modern a.n.a.lysis. Moscow: Moscov. Gos. Univ., Meh.-Mat. Fak., 57-82. Mainra, V.P. 1 ) ( 1963) On self-reciprocal fWlctions. Bull. Calcutta. Math.. Soc., 55, no 1 , 41-49. Makarenko, L.G. 1 ) ( 1975) Certain triple integral equations with kernels of Watson type (Russian). Ukrain.. Mat. Z., 27, Vyp. 5, 682-686. Malakhovskaya, R.M . and Shikhmanter, E.D. 1 ) ( 1975) Certain fonnu1ae for the realization of operators, and their application to the solution of integro-differential equations (Russian). Tndy Tomsk. Gos. Un.iv., 220, 46-56. Malamud, M.M. 1 ) ( 1979) Perturbations of the operator of fractional integration (Russian) . Fun.ktsion.a.l. An.a.l. i Prilozh.. , 13, no 2, 85-86. 2 ) ( 1980) Spectral analysis of Volterra operators with a kernel depending on the difference between arguments (Russian). Ukra.in.. Mat. Z., 32, no 5, 601-609. Malinovski, H. and Smarzewski, R. 1 ) ( 1978) A numerical method for solving the Abel equation. Za.stow. Mat. A ppl. Math.., XVI, 2, 275-281 . Malovichko, V.A. 1 ) ( 1976) A generalized hypergeometric function, and some integral operators that contain it (Russian). In Mat. fiz., Kiev: Naukova Dumlra, Vyp. 19, 99-103. Malozemov, V.M. 1 ) ( 1965) The generalized differentiation of periodic functions (Russian) . Ve•tn.ik Len.in.gra.d. Un.iv., Ser. Ma.t., Meh.., A•tron.., Vyp. 20, no 7, 164-167. 2 ) (1965 ) Generalized differentiation of periodic fWlctions (Russian). In Sb. Na.uch.n. Tndov Leningrad. Meh.. ln•t., 50 , 147-166. 3) ( 1969) Simultaneous approximation of a periodic fWlction and of all its derivatives, including fractional ones, by trigonometric polynomials (Russian). Vestnik Leningrad. Univ., Ser. Mat., Meh.., A •tron., Vyp. 24, no 7, 49-54. 4) ( 1973) Simultaneous approximation of a. function and it. derivative• (Russian). Leningrad: lzdat. Leningrad. Gos. Univ., 112 p. Mamedov, R.G. and Orudzhaev, G.N. 1 ) ( 1981 ) Some characteristics of classes of fWlctions which have fractional derivatives (Russian). In lnve•tiga.tion• on •ome que•tions of th e con.•tnctive theory of functions a.n.d diff. equat. Baku: Azerb. lnst. Nefti i Khimii, 3-11. 2 ) ( 1981 ) Some classes of functions, their interconnection and characteristics (Russian). Ibid., 12-15. Manandhar, R.P. 1 ) (1972 ) Fractional integrals and Meijer Bessel transfonn. Ran chi Un.iv. Math.. J., 3 , 36-43.
Mandelbrojt, S. 1) ( 1925 ) Sulla generalizzazione del calcolo delle variazione. Atti. Reale Acca.d. Na.z. Lin.cei. Rend. Cl. 1ci. fi•· ma.t. e n.a.tur., Ser. 6. 1, 151-156.
Manocha, H.L. 1 ) ( 1965) Transfonnation of integral expression for F4 by means of fractional integration by parts. Bull. Math.. Soc. Sci. Math.. RSR, 9, no 4, 337-341. 2 ) ( 1967) Integral expressions for Appell's functions Ft and F2 . Riv. ma.t. Un.iv. Parma., Ser. 2, 8, 235-242.
BffiLIOGRAPHY
914
3) (1967) Some expa.nsions by fractional derivatives. 303-309.
Mathematica (RSR), 9, no 2,
Manocha, H.L. and Sharma, B.L. 1) (1974) Fractional derivatives and summat ion. J. Indian Math. Soc., 38, no 1-4, 371-382. Marchaud, A. 1) (1927) Sur les denvees et sur les differences des fonctions de variables reeiles. J. math. pwru et appl., 6, no 4, 337-425.
Marichev, 0.1. 1) (1972) Two Volterra equations with Hom functions (RU88i an). Doll. Aiad. Nad SSSR, 20-f, no 3, 546-549 {Transl. in Soviet Math. DoH., 1972, 13, no 3, 703-707}. 2) (1974) The Volterra equation of Mellin convolution type with F3-function in the kernel (Russian) . Vut.i Aiad. Navd BSSR, Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Navd, no 1, 128-129; Dep. in VINITI 21.09.73, no 7307, 23 p. 3) (1974) A class of integral equations of Mellin convolution type with special functions in the kernels (Rusaian). /6id., no 1 , 126-127; Dep. in VINITI 21 .09.73, no 7308, 18 p. 4) (1976) Singular boundary value problems for the generalized biaxially symmetric Helmholtz equation (Russian) . Doll. Ahd. Nad SSSR, 230, no 3, 523-528 {'I'ransl. in SotJiet Math. Doll., 1976, 17, no 5, 1342-1346} 5) (1976) Neumann and Dirichlet weight problems in the half-plane for the generalized Euler-Po.isson-Darboux equation (RU88ian ). Ve•t.i Ai11d. Nnd BSSR, Ser� Fiz. Mat. Nani, no 4, 128-131 . 6) (1976) Some integral equations of Mellin convolution type containing the special functions in the kernels (Russian). /6id., no 6, 119-120; Dep. in VINITI 02.04.76, no 1640, 85 p. 7) (1978) Complete singular integral equations with power-logarithmic kernels which are solvable in quadrature& (Ruuian). Ve•tnii Belon••· Go•. Univ., Ser. 1, no 1, 8-14. 8) (1978) Integral operators with special functions in the kernels which generalize integration operaton of complex order (Rusaian). Ve•t.i Aiad. Navd BSSR, Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nani, no 2, 38-44 . 9} (1978) An integral representation of the solutions of a generalized biaxially symmetric Hehnholtz equation and formulae for its invenion (Russi an). Different.ial'nre Urawaeaira, 1-f, no 10, 1824-1831. 10) (1978) .A met/a.otl of calcwlatia1 iategral• from •pecial f-action• (theor, aad ta61u of Jormwla•) (Russian). Minsk: Nauka i Tekhnib, 310 p. (Transl. as Handbook of lategral Tran•Jorm• of Higher Traa•ceadental F•nction•, theor, and algorithmic table•. Chichester, New Yom: Ellis Horwood Ltd., 1982, 336 p.). 11) (1981) A method for calculating integrals of hypergeometric functions (Russian). Doll .Aiad. Nawi BSSR, 25, no 7, 590-593. 12) (1983) Asymptotic behavior of functions of hypergeometric type (Russi an). Ve•t.i .Ahtl. Nani BSSR, Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nuwi, no 4, 16-25. 13) (1990) Compositions of fractional integrals and derivatives with power weights. In Proc. Intern. Con/. Fractional Calcwl•• aad it• App l. (Tokyo, 1989), ed. K. Nishimoto. Tokyo: Coll. Fngin. Nihon Univ., 94-99. •
0.1. and Vu Kim Tuan 1) (1985) Some VolteJTa equations with Appell function F1 in the kernel (Russian). In Proc. commemorative •emin11r on bowndar, valwe pro61em• (Minsk, 1981), Minsk: Universitetakoe, 169-172. 2) (1985) Composition structure of some integral transfonnations of convolution type (Russian) . In Report. of the eztendetl •e ..io'u of a •eminar of the I.N. Veba ln.t. A ppl. Math. (Tbilisi, 1985). Tbiliss. Goa. Univ., 1 , no 1, 139-142. 3) (1986) The factorization of G-tranaform in two spaces of functions. In Complez A nalrn• and .Appl. '85 (Varna, 1985). Sofia: Publ. House Bulg. Acad. Sci., 418-433.
Marichev
Marke, P.W. ) (1942) Bitlra1 til teoriea for integration og differentiation aJ vilharlig ortlen, I. KobeDhavn: Kommison si hos J.H. Schultz Fori. Fr. Bagges Kgl., 127 p.
BffiLIOGRAPHY
91 5
Martie, B. 1) {1973) A note on fractional integration. Publa. l'inat. math.., Beograd, 16, no 30, 111-113. 2) {1973) On the connections between Riemann-Liouville fractional integral, Meijer and Hankel transforms. Rad. Akad. nauka i Umjetn. Boane i Hercegovine. Od. prirod. i mat. nauh., Sarajevo, 45, lm. 12, 145-148. Martin-Reyes, F.J. and Sawyer, E.T. 1) {1989) Weighted inequalities for Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals of order one and greater. Proc. Amer. Math.. Soc., 308, no 2, 547-558. Martirosyan, V.M. and Ovesyan, K.R. 1) (1986) On the theory of M.M. Dzherbashyan's a-qua.sianalytic classes in angular domains (Russian). Izv. Ahd. Nauk A rmyan. SSR, Ser. Mat., 21, no 4, 392-413. Mathai, A.M. and Saxena, R.K. 1) {1978) The H-function with. Application& in Statiatica and Other Diaciplinea. New York: Halsted Press book John Wiley, 192 p. Mathur, B.L. and Krishna, S. 1) {1976) On multivariate fractional integration operators. Indian J. Pure and Appl. Math.., 8, no 9, 1078-1082. Mathur, S.L. 1) {1971) Meijer-Laplace transform and fractional integration. Math.. Education, A 5, no 2, 58-64 . 2) {1972) Some theorems on fractional integration. Ibid., A 6, no 1, 29--36. Matsnev, L.B. 1) {1980) On generating functions of Volterra integral operators (Russian). In Differentaial'nye uravneniya i teoriya funkbii, Saratov: Izdat. Saratov. Univ., Vyp. 3, 3-24. 2) {1983) On generating functions of a class of Volterra operators (Russian). In Vychial. mat. i programmir., Saratov: Izdat. Saratov. Univ., Vyp. 3, 71-85. Matsnev, L .B. and Hromov, A.P. 1) (1983) On the completeness of the eigen-functions and the adjoint elements of the finite-dimensional perturbation of the Volterra operator (Russian). Ibid., Vyp. 3, 51-55. Matsuyama, N. 1) {1953) Some trigonometrical series, II. J. Math.. Tokyo, 1, no 2-3, 117-127. Maz'ya, V.G. and Havin, V.P. 1) {1972) The nonlinear potential theory (Russian). Uapehi Mat. Nauk, 27, no 6, 67-138. McBride, A.C. 1) {1975) Solution of hypergeometric integral equations involving generalized functions. Proc. Edinburgh. Math.. Soc., 19, no 3, 265-285. 2) (1975) A theory of fractional integration for generalized functions. SIAM J. Math.. Anal., 6, no 3, 583-599. 3) (1976) A note on the spaces F; , w Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh., A 77, no 1-2, 39-47. 4) {1977) A theory of fractional integration for generalised functions, II. Ibid., A 77, no 3-4, 335-349. 5) {1978) The Hankel tr�form of some classes of generalised functions and conneotions with fractional integration. Ibid., A 81, no 1-2, 95-117. 6) {1979) Fractional calculua and integral tranaforma of generaliaetl function&. Res. Notes Math. 3 1 . San Francisco ets.: Fitman Press, 179 p. 7) (1982) Fractional powers of a class of ordinary differential operators. Proc. London Math.. Soc., Ser. 3, 45, no 3, 519-546. 8) (1982) Index laws for some ordinary differential operators. Lect. Notea Math., 964, 465-493. 9) (1983) A note on the index laws of fractional calculus. J. Auatral. Math.. Soc., A 34, no 3, 356-363. 10) {1984) On an index law and a result of Busclunan. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh., A 96, no 3-4, 231-247.
916
BIBLIOGRAPHY
11) (1985) A Mellin transform approach to fractional calculus on (O, oo). In Fractional Calculu•, eds. A.C . McBride, G.F. Roach, Boston: Pitman Adv. Publ. Progr., Re•. Note• Math., 1 38, 99-139. McClure, J .P. and Wong, B.. 1) (1979) Exact remainders for asymptotic expansions of fractional integrals. J. In•t. Math. and Appl., 24, no 2, 139-147. McKellar, B.H.J., Box, M .A. and Love, E.B.. 1) (1963) Inversion of the Struve transform of half integer order. J. A u•tral. Math. Soc., B 25, no 2, 161-174. Meda, S. 1) (1969) A note on fractional integration. Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova, 81 , 31-35. Medvedev, N.V, 1) (1982) Solution of Abel integral equations by the spline method (Russian). In P'I'061em• in the qualitative theoTJ of diff. equat. Cheboksa.ry: Chuvash. Goa. Univ., 62-65. Mhitaryan, S.M. 1) (1968) The formulae of N.J. Ahiezer and V.A. Shcherbina for the inversion of certain singular integrals (Russian). Mat. I••led., Kishinev: Inst. Mat., 3, Vyp. 1 , 61-70. Mihailov, L.G. 1) (1966} Integral equation• with a kernel homog eneou• of degree -1 (Ru8sian). Dushanbe: Donish, 49 p. Mihlin, S.G. 1) (1959) Lecture• on linear integral equation• (Russian). Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 232 p. 2) (1962) Higher-dimen•ional •ingular integral• and integral equation• (Russian) . Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 254 p. Mikolu, M. 1) (1959) Differentiation and integration of complex order of functi0118 represented by trigonometrical series and generalized zeta-functions. A cta Math. A cad. Sci. Hung., 10, no 1-2, 77-124. 2) (1960) Sur Ia sommation des aeries de Fourier au moyen de l'integration d'ordre fractionnaire. C. R. AC4d. •ci. Puu, 251 , no 8, 837-839. 3) (1960) Application d'une nouvelle methode de sommation aux shies trigonometriques et de Dirichlet. A cta Math. A cad. Sci. Hung., 11, no 3-4 , 317-334. 3&) (1962) Uber die Begriindung eines einheitlichen und erweiterten. Infinitesimal kalk:iils im komplexen. A••· Uaiv. •ci., Budaput, Sect. math., 5, 69-76. 4) (1963) Generalized Euler IJUIDS and the sem.igroup property of integro-differential operaton. /6id., 8, 89-101. 5) (1964) Sur Ia propriete principale des operateurs differentiels generalises. C. R. Acad. •ci. Peri•, 258, no 2, 5315-5317. 6) (1975) On the recent trends in the development, theory and applications of fractional calculus. In P'I'Oc. I•tern. Conf. Fr4ctional Calculu• and it• A ppl. (New Haven, 1974), ed. B . Rosa, Lect. Note• Math., oi5T, 357-375. 7) (1984} Jntegro-differential operators and theory of summation. In Functional Analr•i•, Holomorphr aad A pp'I'Ozimdional TheoTJ. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ., Vol. 2, 245-258. 8) (1990) A new method of summations based on fractional integration and generalized zeta-functions. /6id., 106-109. 9) (1990) Historical remarks about the works of M. Riesz in the theory of generalized integro-differential operaton and their applicati0118 . In P'I'Oc. Intern. Con/. Fr4ctional Calculu• cad it• A ppl. (Tokyo, 1989), ed. K. Nishimoto, Tokyo: Coll. Engin. Nihon Univ., llG-111 . Miller, J.B. 1) (1959) A continuum of Hilbert spaces in L2 • P'I'Oc. London Math. Soc., Ser. 3, 9, no 34, 208-226.
' '
BffiLIOGRAPHY
917
Minakshisundaram, S. 1 ) {1944) A note on the theory of Fourier series. Proc. Na.t. In6t. Sci. India., 10, 205-215. Minerho, G.M. and Levy, M.E. 1) {1969) Inversion of Abel's integral equation by means of orthogonal polynomials. SIAM J. Numer. Ana./., 6, no 4, 598-616. Miserendino, D. 1 ) {1982) Tracce delle derivate di ordine frazionario delle funzioni di classe w r in un rettangolo. Boll. unione ma.t ita./. Ana.li6i funziona.le e Appl., Ser. 6, 1-C , no 1, 357-376. 2) {1983) Derivate di ordine frazionario per funzioni di classe w r in un rettangolo limitato di R" e loro tracce . l6itl., 2-C, no 1, 105-156. Misra, A.P. 1 ) {1973) Application of fractional-derivative operators to Rodrigues type of formulae for polynomial sets. Ma.th.. Ba.lka.n., 3, 358-382. Mizuta, Y. 1) {1977) On the radial limits of Riesz potentials at infinity. Hiro6h.ima. Ma.th.. J., 7, no 1 , 165-175. 2) {1987) On the differentiability of Riesz potentials of functions. l6itl.., 17, no 2, 355-359. Mohapatra, R.M . 1) {1973) Note on summability (L) of Fourier integrals. Colloq. Ma.th.., 28, no 2, 291-297. Montel, P. 1) {1918) Sur les polynomes d'approximation. Bull. Soc. ma.th.. France, 46 , 151-196. Moppert, K.F. 1) {1953) U ber einen verallgemeinerten Ableitungsoperator. Comm. Ma.th.. Helv., 27, no 2, 140-150. Most, R. 1) {1871 ) Uber die Anwendung der Differentialquotienten mit allgemeinem Index zum lntegrieren von Differentialgleichungen. Z. a.ngew. Ma.th.. untl Ph.y6., 16, 190-210. Mourya, D.P. 1) {1970) Fractional integrals of the functions of two variables. Proc. Intlia.n A ca.tl. Sci., A 72, no 4, 173-184. M uckenhoupt, B. 1) {1960) On certain singular integrals. Pa.cif. J. Ma.th.., 10, no 1, 239-261 . Muckenhoupt, B . and Stein, E.M. 1) (1965) Classical expansions and their relation to conjugate harmonic functions. Tra.n6. Amer. Ma.th.. Soc., 1 18, no 6, 17-92. Muckenhoupt, B. and Wheeden, R.L. 1) (1971) Weighted norm inequalities for singular and fractional integrals. l6itl., 161, no 2, 249-258. 2) {1974) Weighted norm inequalities for fractional integralS. l6itl., 192, no 465, 261-274. Muckenhoupt, B., Wheeden, R.L. and Young Wo-Sang 1) {1963) L2-multipliers with power weights. Atlv. Ma.th.., 49, no 2, 170-216. Miiller, C. and Richberg, R. 1) {1980) Uber die Radon-Transformation kreissymmetrischer Funktionen und ihre Beziehung zur Sommerfeldschen Theorie der Hankelfunktionen. Ma.th.. Meth.. Appl. Sci., 2, no 1, 108-129. Murdaev, H.M. 1) (1985) The estimat·e of the modulus of continuity of the integrals and derivatives of fractional order (Russian) . Groznyi, Dep. in VINITI 14.06.85, no 4209, 16 p. 2) {1985) The estimates of Zygmund type for Weyl fractional integrals and derivatives (Russian). Groznyi, Dep. in VINITI 18.09.85, no 6720-B, 16 p. Murdaev and H.M., Samko S.G. 1) {1986) Fractional integra-differentiation operators in weighted generalized Holder spaces (Russian). In Vopro6y Vych.i6l. i Prikl. Ma.t., Tashkent, Vyp. 80, 116-1 19. 2) (1986) Weighted estimates of the modulus of continuity for fractional integrals of weighted functions with a given modulus of continuity (Russian). Rostov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI 11 .05.86, no 3351-B, 42 p.
918
BffiLIOGRAPHY 3) {1986) Fractional integro.differentiation in the weighted generalized Holder spaces H(j'(p) with the weight p(x) = (x - a)l'( b - x) " (Rtusia.n). Rostov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI 11 .05.86, no 335�B, 25 p.
Murray, M .A. 1) (1985) Commutators with fractional differentiation and BMO Sobolev spaces. Indiana UnitJ. Matl&. J., 34, no 1, 205-215. 2) (1987) Multilinear singular integrals involving a derivative of fractional order. Stt�.d. Matl&., 8 1, no 2, 139-165. Muskhelishvili, N.I. 1) (1968) Singt�.lar integral eq•ation• (Russian). 2nd ed. Moscow: Nauka, 51l p. (English ed. in Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1965). Nagnibida, N .I. 1) {1966) Certain properties of generalized integration operators in an analytic space (Russian). Sibir.k. Mat. Z., 7, no 6, 1306-1318. Nagy, B.S. 1) (1936) Uber gewisse Extrema.lfragen bei transfonnierten trigonometrischen Entwicklungen, 1: Periodischer Fall. Ber. Verl&andl. Sicl&•i•cl& Akad. Wi11. Leipzig, Matl&. Pl&y•. Kl., 90, 103-134. 2) (1939) Uber gewisse Extremalfragen bei transformierten trigonometrischen Entwicklun gen, II: Nichtperiodischer Fall. Ibid., 91 , no· 1 , 3-24. Nahushev, A.M. 1) (1969) A new boundacy value problem for a certain degenerate hyperbolic equation (Rtusia.n). Dokl. Ahd. Na•A: SSSR, 1 81 , no 4, 736-739. 2) (1974) Inverse problems for degenerate equations, and Volterra integral equations of the third kind (Russian). Different•ial'nJe UratJneniJa, 10, no 1 , 1{)()-111. 3) (1975) A certain mixed problem for degenerate elliptic equations (Russian). 16id., 11, no 1 , 192-195. 4) (1976) The Darboux problem for a certain degenerate second order loaded integro. differential equation (Russian). 16id., 12, no 1 , 103-108. 5) (1977) The Sturm-Liouville problem for a second order ordinary differential equation with fractional derivatives in the lower terms (Russian). Dokl. AA:ad. Nad SSSR, 2 34, no 2 , 308-311 . 6 ) (1985) Nonlocal boundary value problems with shift and their connection with loaded equations (Russian). Different•ial'nJe UratJneni,a, 21, no 1, 92-101 . {Trans!. in Dif. Eq•at. 21 {1985), no 1 , 74-81}. Nahushev, A.M. and Borisov, V.N. 1) {1977) Boundacy value problems for loaded parabolic equations and their applications to the prediction of ground water level (Russian). Different•ial'nJe UratJneni,a, 13, no 1, 105-110. {Transl. in Dif. Eq•at. 13 {1977), no 1, 71-75}. Nahushev, A.M. and Salahitdinov, M.S. 1) (1988) The law of composition of operators for fractional integro.differentiation with various origins (Russian). DoA:l. Acad. Na•A: SSSR, 299, no 6, 1313-1316 {Transl. in SotJiet Matl&. DoA:l., 37 {1966) , no 2, 565-568}. Nair, V.C. 1) {1975) Integral equations of convolution fonn. RitJ. mat. UnitJ. Parma, Ser. 4, 1 , 9-15.
Narain B.oop (see Kesarwani Roop Narain)
Nasibov, F.G. 1 ) {1962) On the degree of the best approximations of functioDS having a fractional derivative in the Riemann-Liouville sense (Russian). In. AA:ad. Nad A zerb. SSR, Ser. Fiz.-Mat. i Tel&n. Nad, no 3, 51-57. 2) {1965) On order of the best approximations of functions in several variables having a fractional derivati� (Rtusia.n). In St•diu of ContemporarJ Problem• Con1t"ctit1e Tl&eor, of F•nction1. Baku: lzdat. Abd. Nauk Azerb. SSR, 73-79.
919
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Nasim, C. 1 ) ( 1982) An integral equation involving Fox's H-function. Indian J. Pure and Appl. Math.., 13, no 10, 1149-1162. Nasim, C. and Aggarwala, B.D. 1 ) ( 1984) On certain dual integral equations. 16id., 15, no 3, 323-340. Nasim, C. and Sneddon, I.N. 1 ) ( 1978) A general procedure for deriving solutions of dual integral equations. J. Eng. Math.., 12, no 2, 115-126. Natanson, I.P. 1 ) ( 1974) Th.eoTJ of function• of a real variable (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 460 p. Nekrasov, P.A. 1 ) ( 1888) General differentiation (Russian). Mat. 56., 1-', Vyp. 1, 45-168. 2 ) ( 1888) An application of general differentiation to integration of equations of the fonn L + = 0 (Russian). I6id., 344-393. 3) ( 1888) An application of general differentiation to a problem of reducing of multidimensional integrals (in connection with integration of the Laplace equation) (Russian). lbid., 410-426. 4) (1891 ) Ueber lineare Differentialgleichungen, welche mittelst bestimmter lntegrale integrirt werden /P.A.Nekr8B80ff/. Math.. Ann., 38, 509-560.
)a• b•x)x• D•y
Nekrasov, P.A. and Pokrovskii, P.M. 1 ) ( 1889) On the examination of the l.liAilUSCripts of A.V. Letnikov, which w� found after his death and were delivered to the mathematical. society (Russian). Mat. 56., 1-', no 2, 202-204.
Nessel, R.J . and Trebels, W. 1 ) (1969) Gebrochene Differentiation und Integration und ChMacterisienmgen von FavMdklassen. In Proc. Con/. Con.tr. Theory Funct., Budapest, 331-341. Nesterov, S.V. 1 ) ( 1961 ) Application of a generalized differentation operator to an equation of the Fuch's class (Russian). Vutnik Mo.cov. Univ., 5er I, Mat. Melt.., no 2, 21-27. Neugebauer, C.J. 1 ) ( 1977) Smooihness of Bessel potentials and Lipschitz functions. Indiana Univ. Math.. J., 26, no 3, 585-591. Neunzert, H. and Wick, J. 1) ( 1966) Uber eine Verallgemeinerung der Abelschen lntegralglei chung. Ber. Kernfor•ch.ung•anlage. Jiilich, no 442, 1-23. Nieva del Pino, M.E. 1 ) (1973) Theoremas de integracion fra.ccional. Tucumtin, A 23, 205-214.
Rev.
Univ.
Nac.
Nikolaev, V.P. 1 ) ( 1973) The estimate of the integrals of potential type in the space Lp with weight. The imbedding theorems (Russian). In Theory and calculation of the tran•mi••ion mech.ani•m•, HabMOvsk, 176-181. 2 ) ( 1973) Estimates of integrals of potential type. Imbedding theorems in L� spaces with a weight (Russian). In lrudy 5em. Kaf. Teoret. Melt.. i Vy..h.. Mat., Vyp. 5, 149-156. Nikol'skaya, N .S. 1 ) ( 1974) The approximation of the differentiable functions of several variables by the Fourier sums in the Lp -metric (Russian.). 5i6ird. Mat. Z., 15, no 2, 395-412.
Nikol'skii, S.M. 1 ) ( 1941 ) Estimations of the remainder of Fejer's sum for periodical functions possesis ng a bounded derivative (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Na·ak 555R, 31, no 3, 210-214. 2 ) ( 1941 ) Sur !'evaluation asymptotique du reste dans !'approximation au moyen des sonunes de Fourier (Russian). I6id., 32, no 8, 386-389. 3) ( 1943) Linear equations in nonned lineM spaces (Russian). IztJ. Akad. Nauk 555R, 5er. Mat., 7, no 3, 147-166. 4) ( 1945) Approximations of periodic functions by trigonometrical polynomials (Russian). Trudy Mat. In•t. 5teklov, 15, 1-76.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
920
5) (1963) Stable boundary values of differentiable functions of several variables (Russian). Mt�.t. Sb. (N.S.), 61, 224-252. 6) (1977) The 11.pprozimt1.tion of function• of 1eveml vt�.ridle• 11.nd the imbedding theorem• (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 455 p. 7) (1983) Cour•e of mt�.themt�.tic41 tl.ntl.lr•i•. Vol. 1 (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 464 p. 8) (1983) Co•r•e of mt�.themt�.tic41 tl.ntl.ly•i•. Vol. 2 (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 446 p. Nikol'skii, S.M., Lions, J.L. and Lizorkin, P.I. 1) (1965) Integral representation and isomorphism properties of some classes of functions /S.M. Nikolsky, J.L. Lions, Pl. Lizorkin/. A nn. dell11. Scuo/11. Norm. S11.p. Pi111., Sci. fi•., m11.t., Ser. 3, 19, no 1 1 , 127-178. Nishimoto, K. 1) (1976) Fractional derivative and integral, Pt I. J. Coli. Engng. Nihon Univ., B-17, 11-19. 2) (1976) Nishimoto's fractional differintegration and the solution of Legendre's differential equation. 16id., B-17, 21-25. 3) (1977) Osler's cut and Nishimoto's cut. 16id., B-18, 9-13. 4) (1977) On the fractional calculus. In Di11ert11.tion• in Celebmtion of the 90th t�.nniverlti.Ty of Coli. of Engng. Nihon Univ., 91-131. 5) (1981 ) Fractional calculus (generalized integral and derivative). In Proc. Srmp. On Frt�.ctiont�.l Ct�.lc•l•• 11.nd it1 A ppl. (Kyoto, 1961), Kyoto Univ., Res . lnst. Math. Sci., 1-32. 6) (1984) Tables of fractional differitegrations of elementary functions. J. Coli. Engng. Nilaon Univ., B-25, 41-46. 7) (1984) Frt�.ctiont�.l Ct�.lc•ln (Integml• 11.nd differentit�.tion• of 11.rbitmrr order). Koriyama: Descartes Press , 197 p. 8) (1985) Applications to the solutions of linear second order differential equations of Fuchs type. In Fmction41 Ct�.lc•l••, eds. A.C. McBride, G .F. Roach, Boston: Pitman Adv. Publ. Progr., Re.. Note. Mt�.tla., 138 , 14�153. 9) (1985) An application of fractional calculus to the differential equation of FUchs type IP2 · z + IPl · (v - az) - !{) zv = f. J. Coli. Engng. Nilaon Univ., B-26, 1-11. 10) (1986) An application of fractional calculus to a differential equation of FUchs type IP2 · (z2 - z) + �Pt (2vz - v + 1) - !{) v(v - 1) = f. 16id., B-27, 5-16. 11) (1986) Application of fractional calculus to a differential equation of FUchs type IP2 · (z2 - z) + �Pt · (2vz - v + 1) - !{) v(v - 1) = f. 16id., B-27, 17-30. 12) (1987) Frt�.ction41 Ct�.lc•l••· Vol. 2. Koriyama: Descartes Press , 169 p. 13) (1989) Frt�.ctiont�.l Ct�.lc•l••· Vol. 3. Koriyama: Descartes Press, 202 p. •
·
•
•
Nishimoto, K. and Kalla, S.L. 1) (1988) Application of fractional calculus to a third order linear ordinary differential equation. SerdiCtl. B•lg. m11.tla. pdl. , 1-i, no 4, 385-391 . 2) (1989) Use of fractional calculus to solve certain linear differential equations. J. Coli. Engng. Nilaon Univ., B-30, 23-26. Nishimoto, K., Owa, S. and Srivastava, H.M. 1) {1984) Solutions to a new class of fractional differintegral equations. 16id., B-25, 75-76. Nishimoto, K. and Tu Shih-Tong. 1) (1990) Applications of fractional calculus to ordinary and partial differential equations of Gauss type. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Frtl.ction41 Ct�.lc•l•• t�.nd it• A ppl. (Tokyo, 1989), ed. K. Nishimoto, Tokyo: Coli. Engin. Nihon Univ., 159--185. 2) (1990) Applications of fractional calculus to third order ordinary and partial differential equations of Fuchs type. 16id., 166-174. Noble, B. 1) (1955) On some dual integral equations. Qu11.rt. J. Mt�.tla., Ozford •er., 6, no 2, 81-87.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
921
2) (1958) Certain dual integral equations. J. Ma.th. a.nd Phy•., 37, no 2, 128-136.
Nogin, V.A. 1) (1980) On the convergence in Lp (R'1 ) of the hypersingular integrals (Russian). Rostov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI 18.11.80, no 4651, 26 p. 2) (1981) Inversion and characterization of the parabolic potentials with Lp -densities (Russian) . Rostov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI 30.03.81, no 1395, 19 p. 3) (1982) Invenion of Bessel potentials (Russian) . Different.ia.l'nye Ura11neniya., 1 8 , no 8, 1407-1411. 4) (1982) Invemion of Bessel potentials (RUMian). Rostov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI 29.04.82, no 2088 , 16 p. 5) (1982) Hypemingular integrals and its applications (Russian). Dr. Di... , Rostov-on Don, 150 p. 6) (1982) On the weighted spaces of Riesz's potentials type (Russian). lz11. Vy..h. Uchelm. Zued. Ma.t., no 6, 77-79. {Transl. in So11iet Ma.th. (lz11. VUZ), 26 (1982), no 6, 1oo-103}. 7) (1985) Inversion of Bessel potentials by means of hypersingulr integrals (Russian). Ibid., no 3, 57-65. 8) (1985) On the almost everywhere convergence of the hypersingular integrals (Russian). Rostov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI 27.05.85, no 3651, 22 p. 9) (1986) Weighted spaces L�,r (P1 1 P2) of differentiable functions of fractional smoothness (Russian). Ma.t. Sb. (N.S.), 131, no 2, 213-224 {Transl. in Math. USSR-Sb., 1966, 59, no 1, 209-221}. 10) (1987) On a method of the invemion and characterization of Bessel potentials with Lp -densities (Russian). In Integral equa.t. a.nd integral operator•, Krasnodar: Kuban. Univ., 64-72. 11) (1987) Convergence of hypersingular integrals (Russian). lz11. Vy..h. Uchebn. Zaved. Ma.t., no 3, �2. {Transl. in So11iet Ma.th. (lz11. VUZ), 31 (1967), no 3, 111-114}. 12) (1988) Application of the hypeningular integrals to characterization of the weighted spaces of the differentiable functions (Russian) . lz11. Severo-Ka.vka.z. Nnch. T•entra Vy.. h. SUoly, Ser. E•te•t11. Nauk, no 2, 59-62. Nogin, V.A. and Rubin, B.S. 1) (1985) Application of the method of the hypersingular integrals to the investigation of the spaces of parabolic potentials (Russian). Rostov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI 26.02.85, no 1457, 53 p. 2) (1985) Inversion and characterization of parabolic potentials with Lp -densities (Russian). DoH. Aiad. Na.d SSSR, 284, no 3, 535-536. {Transl. in Soviet Ma.th. Dokl., 32 (1985), no 2, 44�51}. 3) (1986) Boundedness of the operator of multiplication by a characteristic function of the Strichartz domain in spaces of Riesz potentials (Russian). Izv. Se11ero-Kavkaz. Na.•ch. T•entra. Vy..h. SUoly, Ser. E•te•t11. Nad, no 2, 62-66. 4) (1986) Inversion of parabolic potentials with Lp -densities (Russian). Mat. Zametki, 39, no 6, 831-840. 5) (1987) The spaces .C�, r(Rn + l ) of parabolic potentials. Ana.ly•i• Ma.th., 13, no 4, 321-338. Nogin, V.A. and Samko, S.G. 1) (1980) On the convergence in Lp (R'1 ) of the hypersingular integrals with homogeneous characteristics (Russian). Rostov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI 14.01.81, no 179, 47 p. 2) (1981) On the simultaneous approximation of functions and their Riesz derivatives (Russian) . Doil. Aka.d. Na.uk SSSR, 261 , no 3, 548-550. {Transl. in Soviet Ma.th. Doil., 24 (1981), no 3, 552-554}. 3) (1982) Convergence in Lp(Rn ) of hypersingular integrals with a homogeneous characteristic (Russian). In Diff. and integral eq·ut. a.nd their a.ppl. Elista: Kalmytsk. Gos. Univ., 119-131.
922
BIBLIOGRAPHY 4) (1985) Inversion and characterization of Riesz potentials with densities in weighted Lp -spa.ces (Russian). Izv. Vy•d. Uch ebn. Za.ved. Ma.t., no 1, 7G-72.
Nozaki, Y. 1) (1964) On Riemann-Liouville integral of ultra-hyperbolic type. Koda.i Ma.th. Sem. Rep., 6, no 2, 69-87.
Nunokawa, M. and Owa, S. 1) (1990) An application of fractional calculus for certain analytic functions. In Proc. Intern. Conf. FrtJ.ctiona.l Ca.lculu• a.nd iu A ppl. (Tokyo, 1969), ed. K. Nishimoto, Tokyo: Coli. Engin. Nihon Univ., 175-178.
Ogievetskii, 1.1. 1) (1957) Generalizations of some results of G.H. Hardy, J.E. Littlewood and A. Zygmund on fractional integration and differentiation of periodic functions (Russian). Ukrt�.in. Ma.t. Z., 9, no 2, 205-210. 2) (1958) On the theory of fractional differentiation and integration of periodic functions belonging to an Lp class with p > 1 (Russian). Dokl. Aka.d. Na.d SSSR, 118, no 3, 443-446. 3) (1958} Generalization of P. Civin's inequality for the fractional derivative of a trigonometric polynomial to L, -space (Ukrain.). Dop. Aka.d. Nul: Ukra.in. RSR, no 5, 466-468 . 4) (1958) Generalization of the inequality of P. Civin for the fractional derivative of a trigonometrical polynomial to Lp space /I.I. Ogiewetzki/. A cta. Ma.th. A ca.d. Sci. Hung., 9, no 1-2, 133-135. 5) (1961) Integration and differentiation of fractional order of periodic functions and constructive theory of functions (Russian). In Studie• of Modern Problem• of Con•t"ctitJe Theorr of Function• (Leningrad, 1959), Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 159-184. Okikiolu, G.O. 1) (1965) A generalisation of the Hilbert transform. J. London Ma.th. Soc., 40, no 1, 27-30. 2) (1966) Fourier transf'onns and the operator H01 • Proc. Ca.mbridge Phil. Soc., 62, no 1 , 73-78. 3) {1966) On integral operators with kernels involving Bessel functions. 16id., no 3 , 477-.484. Ja) {1966) Bounded linear transformations in V space . J. London Ma.th. Soc., 41 , no 3, 401--414. 4) {1967) Fractional integrals ol the Ha-type. Qua.rt. J. Ma.th., Ozfortl •er., 18, no 69, 33-42. 5) (1969) On the operator F.; > and fractional integrals. J. London Ma.th. Soc., Ser. 2, 1, no 4, 619-629. 6) {1970) On integral operators with kernels involving Bessel functions (correction and addendum). Proc. Ca.mbridge Phil. Soc., 67, no 3, 563-586. 7) (1971) A •pect• of the theorr of bounded integra./ opera.tor• in L, -•pa.ce•. London: Acad. Press . 522 p.
Oldham, K.B. and Spanier, J. 1) (1974) The fra.ctiona.l ca.lcul••· New York, London: Acad. Press , 234 p. 2) (1976) Fractional calculus and its applications. Bull. In•t. Politehn. IASI, Sec. 1, 24, no 3-4, 29-34. Olevskii, M.M. 1) (1949) Solution of the Dirichlet problem for the equation Au + (p/:cn ) (8u/8:cn ) = p Cor a hemispherical region (Russian). Dokl. Aka.d. Na.d SSSR, 64, no 6, 767-770. Olmstead, W.E. and Handelsman, R.A. 1) (1976) Asymptotic solution to a class of nonlinear Volterra integral equations. SIAM J. A ppl. Ma.th., 30, no 1 , 130-189. Olver, F. 1) (1990} A•rmptotic. a.nd •pecia.l f-nction• (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 523 p. (English ed. in Academic Press, 1974).
BIBLIOGRAPHY
923
O'Neil, R.O. 1) {1963) Convolution operaton and q) spaces. Dde Matlt.. J., 30, no 1 , 135--1 40. 2) {1965) Fractional integration in Orlicz spaces, I. 7ra••· Amer. Matlt.. Soc., 1 1 5, no 3, 300-328. 3) {1966) Les fonctions conjugees et les integrales fractionnaires de Ia cl&88e8 C. R. A cad. •ci. Pari•, 263, no 14, A463-A466.
L(p,
L(log+ L)• .
Onneweer, C .W. 1) {1975) Fractional differentiation and Lipschitz spaces on local fields. In Matl. Note•, Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press , 2) {1980) Fractional differentiation and Lipschitz spaces on local fields. 7ra••· Amer. Matlt.. Soc., 258, no 1 , 155-165. 3) {1980) Saturation results for operators defining fractional derivatives on local fields. Colloq. Matlt.. Soc. J&ao• Bol,ai, 35, 923-931 . Orazov, I. 1) {1981) A boundary value problem with shift for a generalized Tricomi problem (Russian) . Differeauial'aye Uravaeaiya, 17, no 2, 339-344. 2) {1982) A problem with displacement for a hyperbolic equation with noncharacteristic degeneration on a part of the boundary (RU88ian). 16itl., 18, no 1 , 92-100. {Transl. in Dif. Equat. 1 8 {1982), no 1 , 7lHW}. Ortner, M. 1) {1980) Faltung hypersingulirer lntegraloperatoren. Matlt.. Aaa., 248, no 1, 19-46. 2) {1985) Analytic continuation and convolution of hypersingular higher Hilbert-Riesz kernels. In A. Haar memor. coaf. (Budapest, 1965), Colloq. Matlt.. Soc. J&no• Bol,ai, 49 , 675-£85. Orton, M. 1) {1980) The generalized Abel equations for Schwartz distributions. SIA M J. Matlt.. Aaal., 1 1 , no 3, 596-611 . O'Shaughnessy, L. 1) {1918) Problem # 433. Amer. Matlt.. Moatlt.., 25, 172-173. Osler, T .J . 1) {1970) Leibniz rule for fractional derivatives, generalized and an application to infinite series. SIAM J. Appl. Matlt.., 18, no 3, 658-674. 2) {1970) The fractional derivative of a composite function. SIAM J. Matlt.. Aaal., 1 , no 2 , 288-293. 3) {1971) Taylor's series generalized for fractional derivatives and applications. 16itl., 2 , no 1, 37--46. 4) {1971) Fractional derivatives . and Leibniz rule. Amer. Ma.tlt.. Month., 78, no 6, 645--649. 5) {1972) A further extension of the Leibniz rule to fractional derivatives and its relation to Parseval's formula. SIA M J. Matlt.. Aaal., 3 , no 1 , 1-16. 6) {1972) An integral analogue of Taylor's series and its use in computing Fourier transforms. Matlt.. Comput., 26, no 116, 449-480. 7) {1972) The integral analog of the Leibniz rule. 16id., no 120, 903-915. 8) {1973) A correction to Leibniz rwe for fractional derivatives. SIAM J. Matlt.. Anal., 4, no 3, 456-459. 9) {1975) Open questions for research. In Proc. latera. Coaf. Fractional Calcul•• and it. Appl. (New Haven, 1974), ed. B. Ross, Lect. Notu Matlt.., 467, 378-381 . 10) {1975) Leibniz rule for fractional derivatives use d t o generalize formulas of Walker and Cauchy. Bul. la•t. Politelt.a. la•i, Sec. I., 2 1 , no 1-2, 21-24 Owa, S. 1) (1976) On the distortion theorems, I. Kyuagpook Matlt.. J., 18, no 1, 53-59. 2) {1980) On applications of the fractional calculus. Matlt.. Japaa., 25, no 2, 195--206. 3) {1981) A remark on new criteria for univalent functions. K,uagpook Matlt.. J., 21, no 1, 15-23. 4) {1981) An application of the fractional derivative, I. 16id., no 2, 205-212. 5) {1981) On the fractional calculus. In Proc. Symp. Oa Fractioaal Ca.lc•l•• and it. A ppl. (Kyoto, 1961), Kyoto Univ., Res . lnst. Math. Sci., 57--60.
924
BIBLIOGRAPHY 6) (1982) On the Rusdleweyh's new criteria for univalent functions. Math. Japan., 27, no 1, 77-96. 7) (1982) On the classes of univalent functions with negative coefficients. Ibid., no 4, 409-416. 8) (1982) An application of the fractional calculus. KJ•ngpooi Math. J., 22, no 1, 15-19. 9) (1982) On new criteria for analytic functions. Tamhng J. Math., 13, no 2, 201-213. 10) (1983) An application of the fractional derivative, II. 16itl., 1-6, no 2, 123-130. 11) (1983) An application of the fractional derivative, III. Math. Japan. , 28, no 2, 239-244. 12) (1983) On certain subclass of analytic and univalent functions in the unit diso. B•ll. Iran Matlt.. Soc., 10, no 1-2, 55--6.6 12a) (1984) On new criteria for univalent functions. Tamhng J. Math., 1 5 , 25-34. 12b) (1984) On new classes of analytic functions with negative coefficients. Intern. J. Matlt.. anti Math. Sci., no 7, 719-730. 13) (1985) Some applications of the fractional calculus. In Fractional Calc•l••, eds. A.C. McBride, G.F. Roach, Boston: Pitman Adv. Publ. Progr., Re•. Note• Math., 138, 164-175. 14) (1985) An application of the Ruscheweyh derivatives. Math. Japan., 30, no 6, 927-946. 15) (1985) An application of the Ruscheweyh derivatives, II. Pdl. ln•t. math., 38, 99-110. 16) (1985) On functions satisfying Re [/(z)/z) > Ot. Tamhng J. Math., 16, no 3, 35--44. 17) (1986) On Komatu's conjectures for certain linear operator. Mat. Veanii, 38, no 4, 545-551. 18) (1990) On certain generalization subclasses of analytic functions involving fractional calculus. In Proc. Intern. Con/. Fractional Calc•l•• anti it. A ppl. (Tokyo, 1989), ed. K. Nishimoto, Tokyo: Coli. Engin. Nihon Univ., 170-184.
Owa, S. and Ahuja, O.P. 1) (1965) An application of the fractional calculus. Math. Japan., 30, no 6, 947-955.
Owa, S. and Al-Bassam, M .A. 1) (1986) An application of the fractional calculus. P•re anti Appl. Math. Sci., 2-6, no 1-2, 1-7. Owa, S. and Nishimoto, K. 1) (1982) A remark on Nishimoto's fractional difl'erintegrations. J. Coli. Engng. Nih on Uniw., B-23, 25-32. 2) (1984) A note on a class of convex functions. Ibid., B-25, 53-56. Owa, S. and Obradovi�, M. 1) (1986) A remark on the Ruacheweyh derivatives. B•ll. Soc. Ro,. Sci. Liege, 55, no 2, 279-284. Owa, S. and Ren, F. 1) (1989) An application of certain convolution operators. Math. Japan., no 5, 815--819. Owa, S., Saigo, M. and Srivastava, H.M. 1) (1989) Some characterization theorems for starlike and convex functions involving a certain fractional integral operator. J. Math. Anal. anti Appl., 1-60, no 2, 419--426. Owa, S. and Sekine, T. 1) (1986) A note on Ruscheweyh derivatives. B•ll. Soc. RoJ. Sci. Liege, 55, no 4, 483--486. Owa, S. and Shen, C.Y. 1) (1985) On the coefficients of generalized starlike of convex functions of order Ot. 16itl., 5-6, no 4-5, 195-202. Owa, S. and Srivastava, H.M. 1) (1969) A distortion theorem and a related conjecture involving fractional derivatives of convex function. In Univalent F•nction•, Fractional Calc•l•• anti their Appl., ed. H.M. Srivastava, S. Owa, New York, Chichester: Halsted Press , John Willey and Sons, 219-228.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
925
Pacchiarotti, N. and Zanelli, V. 1) (1983) Ortogonalita di polinomi di grado non intero: il cuo delle derivate di ordine 1/2 dei polinomi di Legendre. Atti Semi'A. mat. e fi•· U7&i11. Motlef&a, 32, no 1, 60-81. Pahareva, N.A. and Virchenko, M.A. 1) (1962) Some integral transformations in tho class of x� -analytic fm1ctions (Ukrain.). Dop. Aiatl. Na•i Uirai'A. RSR, no 8, 998-1003. Palamodov, V.P. 1) (1980) Riemann-Liouville integrals, singular points of byperswfaces and hyperbolic equations (RW18ian). In Proc. Co'J&f. Partial tliff. eq•at. (Novosibirsk, 1978). Novosibirsk: Nauka, Sibirsk. Otdel., 144-146. Paley, R.E.A.C. 1) (1930) On the Cesaro 811DlDl&bility of Fourier series and allied series. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 26, no 2, 173-203. Parashar, B.P. 1) (1967) Domain and range of fractional integration operators. Mat/a. Japa'A., 12, no 2, 141-145. Pathak, R.S. 1) (1973) Some theorems on Whittaker transfonns. l'Atlia'A J. Pare af&tl Appl. Mat/a., 4, no 3, 308-317. 2) (1978) On a class of dual integral equations. Proc. Ko'Agl. Netlerl. Aiatl. Wete'A., A 81, no 4, 491-501. Pavlov, P.M. and Samko, S.G. 1) (1984) Description of spaces L�(Sn - 1 ) in tenns of spherical bypersingular integrals (Russian). DoH. Ahtl. Nad SSSR, 276, no 3, 546-550. {Transl. in Soviet Mat/a. DoU, 29 (1984), no 3, 549-553}. Peacock, G. 1) (1833) Report on the recent progress and present state of certain branches of analysis (general differentiation). 9rtl af&f&1£al report of tlae Briti•la Auoc., 206-225, 24Q-247. Peetre, J. 1) (1969) On the theory of £, >.. spaces. J. F•7&ct. Analr•i•, 4, no 1, 71-87. , Pekarskii, A.A. 1) (1983) Rational approximations of the class Hp , 0 < p � oo (Russian). DoH. Aiatl. Na·d BSSR, 2'1, no 1 , 9-12. 2) (1984) Direct and inverse theorems of rational approximation of the Hardy class (Russian). 16id., 28, no 2, 111-114. 3) (1984) Inequalities of Bernstein type for derivatives of rational functions, and inverse theorems of rational approximation (Russian) . Mat. 56. (N.S. ), 124, no 4, 571-588. Pennell, W.O. 1) (1932) The use of fractional integration and differentiation for obtaining certain expansions in terms of Bessel functions or of sines and cosines. Ball. A mer. Mat/a. Soc., 38, 115-122. Penzel, F. 1) (1986) Zur Theorie Verallgemeinerter Abelscher Integralgleichungen. Dr. Diu., Darmstadt, 63 p. 2) (1987) On the theory of generalized Abel integral equations on the half-line. [f&tegr. Eq•at. af&tl Operator Tlaeorr, 10, no 4, 595--620. Peschanskii, A.I. 1) (1984) Integral equations with bypergeometric fm1ction on closed contour (Russian) . Odessa, Dep. in Ukrain. NIINTI 29.02.84, no 361 Uk-D, 25 p. 2) (1989) On a characterization of the space of fractional integrals of curvilinear convolution type. (Russian). Izv. Vr•c•la. Uclae67&. Zavetl. Mat., no 7, 29-39. Peters, A.S. 1) (1961) Certain dual integral equations and Sonine's integrals. Technical Report No 265, IMM-NYU. Courant Inst. Math. Sci. New York Univ., 41 p. 2) (1969) Some integral equations related to Abel's equation and the Hilbert transform. Comm. P•re a'Atl Appl. Matl&., 22, no 4, 539-560. Pichorides, S.K. 1) (1972) On the best values of the constants in the theorems of M. Riesz, Zygmm1d and Kolmogorov. St•tl. Mat/a., 4:4, no 2, 165-179.
926
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Pilidi, V.S. 1) (1968) On some properties of multiple Abel operators (Russian) . In Mater. &econd &ci. conf. y oung &cienti•t• of Ro&tov. region. Sect. natur. &ci., Rostov on-Don: lzdat. Rostov. Univ., 125-126. Pinkevich, V.T. 1) (1940) Sur l'ordre du reste de la serie de Fourier des fonctions derivables an sens de Weyl (Russian). Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat., 4, no 6, 521-526. Pinney, E. 1) (1945) A class of integral equations which generalize Abel's equation. Bull. A mer. Math.. Soc., 5 1 , no 4, 259-265. Pitcher, E. and Sewell, W.E. 1) (1938) Existence theorems for solutions of differential equations of non-integral order. Ib id., 44, no 2, 100-107 (A correction in no 12, p. 888) . Plessis, N .du 1) (1952) A theorem about fractional integrals. Proc. A mer. Math.. Soc., 3, 892-898. 2) (1955) Some theorems about the Riesz fractional integral. Iran&. A mer. Math.. Soc., 80, no 1, 124-134 Poisson, S.D. 1) (1823) Memoire sur !'integration des equations lineaires aux differences partielles. J. l'Ecole Roy. Polytech.n., 12, 21 5-246. Pokalo, A.K. 1) (1970) Linear methods for the approximation of derivatives and integrals in the sence of Weyl of periodic functions (Russian). Ve&t&i Akad. Navuk BSSR, Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Natrak, no 2, 32-39. Polking, J .C. 1) (1972) A Leioniz formula for some differentiation operators of fractional order. Indiana Univ. Math.. J., 21, no 11, 1019-1029. Pollard, H. and Widder, D.V. 1) (1970) Inversion of a convolution transform related to heat conduction. SIAM J. Math.. A nal., 1, no 4, 527-532. Polozhii, G.N. 1) (1964) Limit values and inversion formulae along the cuts of the fundamental integral representation for p-analytic functions with characteristic p = xlc , I (Russian). Ukrain. Mat. Z., 16, no 5, 631-656. 2) (1965) Generalization of the theory of analytic function• of a complex variable. P antdytic and (p, q)-analytic function• and &om e of their application• (Russian). Kiev: lzdat. Kiev. Univ., 442 p. 3) (1973) The theory and application of p-analytic and (p, q)-analytic function• (Russian). Kiev: Naukova Dumb, 423 p. Polya, G. and Szego, G. 1) {1931 ) U ber den transfiniten Durchmesser (Kapazititskonstante) von ebenen und riumlichen Punktmengen. J. fir reine und a !'gew. Math.., 165, 4--49. Ponce, G. 1) {1987) The initial value problem for a nonlinear nonuniform parabolic equation. A nn. math.. pura ed appl., 148, 17-28. Ponomarenko, S.P. 1) {1978) The solution of a class of triple integral equations associated with the integral Hankel transformation (Russian). Ukrain. Mat. J., 30, no 8, 833-840. 2) {1982) The operator method for solving systems of dual integral equations which are connected with the Mehler-Fock integral transformation (Russian). Ib id., 34, no 3, 316-321. Ponomarenko, V.G. 1) (1979) A .F. Timan's inequalities for the modulus of smoothness of fractional order (Russian). Dnepropetrovsk, Dep. in VINITI 20.08.79, no 3093, 16 p. 2) (1983) Modulus of smoothness of fractional order and the best approximations in Lp {1 < p < oo) (Russian). In Con&tMI.ctive Function Th.eory'81 (Varna: 1981). Sofia: Publ. House Bulg. Acad. Sci., 129-133. Popov, G.Ya. 1) {1976) The method of dual integral equations (Russian). In Development of contact problem& in USSR, Moscow: Nauka, 56-87. Popoviciu, T. 1) (1934) Sur quelques proprietes des fonctions d'une ou de deux variables reelles. Math ematica {Cluj), 8 , 1-85.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
927
Post, E.L. 1) {1919) Discussion of the solution of (d/dz) 1 1 2 , = y/z (problem # 433) . A mer. MG.th. Month., 26, 37-39. 2) {1930) Generalized differentiation. Tran1. Amer. Math. Soc., 32, 723-781 . Prabhakar, T.R. 1) {1969) Two singular integral equations involving confluent hypergeometric functions. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 66, no 1, 71-89. 2) {1971) Some integral equations with Kummer's functions in the kernels. Canatl. Math. Bull., 1<&, no 3, 391--404. 3) {1911) A singular integral equation with a generalized Mittag-Lemer function in the kernel. Yokohama Math. J., 19, 7-15. 4) {1972) A cl&SS of integral equations with G&U88 functions in the kernels. Math. Nachr., 52, no 1-6, 71-83. 5) {1972) Hypergeometric integral equations of a general kind and fractional integration. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 3, no 3, 422--425. 6) {1977) A general class of operators involving and related integral equations. J. Indian Math. Soc., <&1, no 1-2, 163-179.
� 1 (a,b;c;z,w)
Prabhakar, T.R. and Chakrabarty, M. 1) {1976) A cl&SS of basic integral equations with basic hypergedmetric function 1� 1 in the kernels. Indian J. Pure anti Appl. Math., 7, _ no 11, 1253-1260. Prabhakar, T.R. and Kasbyap, N.K. 1) {1980) A new cl&SS of hypergeometric integral equations. 16itl., 1 1 , no 1 , 92-97. Preobrazhenskii, N.G. 1) {1978) The Abel inversion in the physical problems (RU88ian). In Abel'• inver•ion anti it. generalization•. Novosibirsk: lnst. teor. i prikl. meh. Sibirsk. Otdel. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 6-24.
Prudnikov, A.P., Brycbkov, Yu.A. and Marichev, 0.1. 1) (1961) Integral• anti Serie1. Elementary Function• (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 800 p. (English ed. as Vol. 1 in New York, London: Gordon and Breach Sci. Publ., 1986, 798 p.). 2) {1983) Integral• anti Seriu. Special Functio•• (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 752 p. (English ed. as Vol. 2 in New York, London: Gordon and Breach Sci. Publ., 1986, 750 p.). 3) {1985) Integral• anti Serie1. SupplementarJ Chapter• (RU88ian). Moscow: Nauka, 801 p. (English ed. as Vol. 3: More •pecial function• in New York, London, Gordon and Breach Sci. Publ., 1989, 800 p.). 4) {1989) Calculus of integrals and Mellin transform (Russian). In Mathematical analy•i•. Itogi Nadi i Tekhniki. Moscow: Acad. Nauk SSSR. VINITI, 27, 3-146. Pryde, A.J. 1) {1990) Spaces with homogeneous norms. Bull. Au.stral. Math. Soc., 21, no 2, 189-205. Rabinovich, V.S. 1) {1969) A multidimensional equation of convolution type the symbol of which has singulMities of a complex power-type function of a lineMly-homogeneous cone (Russian). Izv. v,,,h. Uchebn. Zavetl. Mat., no 8, 64-74. Rabinovich, Yu.L. 1) {1951) Notes of the translators (Russian). In R. Co•rant, D. Hilbert: Method• of Mathematical Phr•ic•, 3d ed., Vol. 2 (Russian). Moscow, Leningrad: Gos. lzdat. Tehn.-Teor. Lit., 1951 , 520-529.
Rabinovich, Yu.L . and Nesterov, S.V. 1) {1961) General fonn of the lineal" differential equations with the degree reduced by tho generalized differentiation operator va (Russian). Dokl. Aiatl. Nauk SSSR, 1 37, no 6, 1309-1311. Rabotnov, Yu.M . 1) {1948) The equilibrium of the elastic environment with post-action (Russian) . Prikl. mat. i meh., 12, 53-62. Radzhahov, E.L. 1) {1974) Certain hypersingular integral operators (Russian). Izv. Akatl. Naul: Tadzhik. SSR, Ottlel. Fiz.-Mat. Him. i Geol. Nauk, no 2, 17-25.
928
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Radzhabov, M. 1) (1971) Certain integral representations for a Hehnholtz type equation with a singular curve (Russian). Doil. Ahd. Nad Tadzlii. SSR, 14:, no 8, 5-9. 2) (1978) Elementary solutions and integral representations for a class of differential equations with n-singular hyperplane (Russian). Differentlia.l'nfe Ura.vneniJa, 14:, no 10, 1832-1843. 3) (1980-1982) Tle integral repre1enta.tion• and bo•ndar, val•e problem• for •ome differential eq•ation• witl a •ing•lar line or 1ing•lar ••rfacu. In 3 parts (Russian). Dushanbe: Tadzh. Univ., Pt. 1: 127 p.; Pt. 2: 170 p.; Pt. 3: 170 p. 4) (1982) Integral representations and boundary value problems for an equation of Helmholtz type with several singular surfaces (RU88ian). In Anal,tic metlod• in tle tleor, of elliptic eq•at. Novosibirsk: Naub., Sibirsk. Otdel., 34-46. Radzhabov, N., SaUarov, A.S. and Dzhahirov, D.K. 1) (1977) FUndamental solution and integral representations for an equation of elliptic type with two singular lines (Russian). Doil. Ahd. Na.d Tadzlii. SSR, 20, no 9, 13-17. 2) (1977) The analogue of Poisson formula for a certain second order equation of elliptic type with two singular lines (Russian). 16id., 20 , no 12, 3-7. Rafal'son, S.Z. 1 ) (1971) Fourier-Laguerre coefficients (Russian). lzv. v,,l. Uclebn. Za.ved. Ma.t., no 11, 93-98. Raina, R.K. 1) (1979) On the Weyl fractional differentiation. Indian J. P•re and Appl. Ma.tl., 10, no 1-2, 37--41 . 2) (1984) On composition of certain fractional integral operators. 16id., 15, no 5, 509-518. 3) (1984) On the multiple Weyl fractional integral of a general system of polynomials. Boll. •nione mat. ital., Ser. 6, 3-A, no 2, 283-287. Raina, R.K. and Kiryakova, V.S. 1) (1983) On the Weyl fractional operator of two dimensions. C. R. A cad. B•lg. Sci. , 36, no 10, 1273-1276. Raina, R.K. and Koul, C.L. 1) (1977) Fractional derivatives of the H-functions. Jna.ndla, 7, 97-105. 2) (1981) On Weyl fractional calculus and H-function transform. KJ•ngpooi Matl. J., 21, no 2, 275-279. Rakesh, S.L. 1) (1973) Theorems on fractional integration operators. Ftuc. Matl., 7, 37--40. Reddy, G.L. and Pad.manabhan, K.S. 1) (1985) Some properties of fractional integrals and derivatives of univalent functions. Indian J. P•re and Appl. Matl., 16, no 3, 291-302. Reimann, H.M. and Rychener, T. 1) (1975) F\mktionen beschrinkter mittlerer Oszillation. Lect. Note• Matl., 4:87, 1-141. Repin, O.A. 1) (1990) A boundary value problem for moisture transfer equation (Russian). DifTerent•ial'nJe UravneniJa, 26, no 1, 16�171. Ricci, F. and Stein, E.M. 1) (1989} Hannonic analysis on nilpotent groups and singular integrals, III: Fractional integrals along manifolds. J. F•nct. A nalJ•i•, 86, 360-389. Rieder, P. 1 ) (1969} Die AuflO.ung einer Klasse verallgemeinerter Abelscher Jntegralgleichungen. Ma.tl. Z., 1 09, no 1 , 2�52. Riekstyn'sh, E.Ya. 1} (1970) Asymptotic representation of certain types of convolution integral (Russian). Latvian Mat. Ezlegodnii, Vyp. 6, 223-239. 2} (1974-1981) A •Jmptotic ezpan•ion• of integral•. In 3 vols (Russian). Riga: Zinatne, Vol. 1 : 1974, 391 p.; Vol. 2: 1977, 463 p.; Vol. 3: 1981, 370 p. Riemann, B. 1} (1876) Versuch einer allgemeinen Auffassung der Integration und Differentiation. In Ge1ammelte Matlema.ti1cle Werie •nd Wi••en•cla.ftlicler. Leipzig: Teubner, 331344 (New ed. Guammelte in New Yolk: Nachlau. Dover Publ. Inc., 1953, 558 p. + 116 p.). •.•
BIBLIOGRAPHY
929
Riesz, M. 0) (1910} Sur Wl probleme d' Abel. Rend. Circolo Mat. Palermo, 3 0 , 339-348. 1} (1922-1923) Sur Wl theoreme de Ia moyenne et ses applications. Acta Litt. a c Sci. reg. Univ. Hung. Francisco-Josephinae. Sec. Sci. Math., 1 , 114-128. 2} (1936) Potentiels de divers ordres et leurs fonctions de Green. In C. R. Congres Intern. Math. Oslo, 2, 62-63. 3) (1936} L'integrales de Riemann-Liouville et solution invariantive du probleme de Cauchy pour !'equation des ondes. Ibid., 44-45. 4} (1938) L'integrales de Riemann-Liouville et potentiels. Acta Litt. A cad. Sci. Szeged, 9, 1-42. 5) (1939) Rectification an travail "lntegrales de Riemann-Liouville et potentiels" . Ibid., 9, no 2, 116-118. 6) (1949) L 'integrales de Riemann-Liouville et le probleme de Cauchy. Acta Math., 8 1 , no 1-2, 1-223. 7) (1961} The analytic continuation of the Riemann-Liouville integral in the hyperbolic case. Canad. J. Math., 1 3, no 1, 37-47. 8} (1967 (1939)} L'integrale de Riemann-Liouville et le probleme de Cauchy pour l'equation des ondes. Bull. Soc. math. France. Dec. suppl., 153-170. Roberts, K.L. 1} (1982) On fractional integrals equivalent a constant. Canad. Math. Bull., 2 5 , no 3, 335-336. Rooney, P.G, 1 ) (1956) On some properties of certain fractional integrals. Trans. Ro1J. Soc. Canada, Ser. 3, 50, 61-70. 2) (1972) On the ranges of certain fractional integrals. Canad. J. Math., 24, no 6, 1193-1218. 3) (1973) A technique for studying the boWldedness and extendability of certain types of operators. I6id., 25 , no 5, 1090-1102. 4) (1978) On the ranges of certain fractional integrals, II. Appl. Anal., 8, no 2, 175-184. 5) (1983) On integral transformations with G-function kernels. Proc. Ro1J. Soc. Edinburgh, A 93, no 3-4 , 265-297. Ross, B. 1) (1975} A brief history and exposition of the fundamental theory of fractional calculus. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Fractional Calculus and it. Appl. (New Haven, 1974) , ed. B . Ross, Lect. Notes Math., 457, 1-36. 2) (1977) The development of fractional calculus 1695-1900. Historia Math., 4, 75-89, 3} (1977) Fractional calculus. An historical apologia 56 # 5811 for the development of a calculus using differentiation and antidift'erentiation of non-integral orders. Math. Magaz., 50, no 3, 115-122. Rothe, R. 1) (1931) Zur Abelschen lntegralgleichung. Math. Z., 33, no 3, 375-387. Rozanova, G.I. 1} (1976) Sharp integral inequalities with the derivatives of order (Russian). Mat. fizilca, Vyp. 3, 97-103.
a
> 0
Rozet, T .A. 1) (1947} On inversion fonnulas for a class of integral transforms (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 57, no 3, 227-230. Rubin, B.S. 1} (1972) On the spaces of fractional integrals on straightline contour (Russian). Izv. Akad. Nauk Arm1Jan. SSR, Ser. Mat., 7, no 5, 373-386. 2) (1972) On operators of potential type in weight spaces on an arbitrary contour (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 207, no 2, 3Q0-303 {Transl. in Soviet Math. Dokl., 1972, 13, no 6, 1530-1 534} . 3) (1973) Potential operators on an interval of the real axis (Russian). Izv. V11ssh. Uch ebn. Zaved. Mat., no 6, 73-81 . 4} (1973) The Noethericity of operators of potential type with power-logarithmical kernels on an interval of the real axis (Russian). Izv. Severo-Kavkaz. Nauch. Tsentra V11ssh. Shkol1J, Ser. Estestv. Nauk, no 4, 112-1 14.
930
BIBLIOGRAPHY
5) (1974) The operators of potential type on a union of intervals of the real axis (Russian). In Mat. Analy•i• and it. A ppl. Rostov-on-Don: Izdat. Rostov. Univ., Vyp. 5, 144-149. 6) (1974) The operators of potential type on a curvilinear contour (Russian). 16id., 1 50-155. 7) (1974) Fractional integrals in Holder spaces with weight, and operators of potential type (Russian). lzv. A kad. Nauk Armyan. SSR, Ser. Mat., 9, no 4, 308-324. 8) {1975) The Noethericity of operators of potential type in spaces of functions p-sununable with weight (Russian). lzv. Vy8d. Uchehn. Zaved. Mat., no 8, 81-90. 9) {1976) Operators of potential type with power-logarithmic kernels in the case of a nonnegative exponent for the logaritlun (Russian). lzv. Severo-Kavkaz. Nauch. T&entra Vy8&h. Shkoly, Ser. Estestv. Nauk, no 3, 17-22. 10) (1977) A general method for the study of the Noethericity of operators of potential type with power-logarithmic kernels on a finite segment (Russian). lzv. Akad. Nauk A rmyan. SSR, Ser. Mat., 12, no 6, 447-461 (Corrections in 16id., 1979, 14, no 1 , 70-71 ). 1 1 ) {1980) Noether theory for generalized Abel equations with a real exponent (Russian). Differenbial'nye Urauneniya, 16, no 5, 917-927 {Transl. in Diff. equat., 1980, 16, no 5, 591-600} 1 2) {1980) The characterization of the range of the convolution operators with power logarithmical kernels on the finite segment (Russian). Rostov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI 18.11.80, no 4848, 20 p. 13) {1980) On the Noethericity of integral equations of the first kind with a finite number of kernel of potential type (Russian). ]ztJ. Severo-Kavkaz. Nauch. T&entra Vyuh. Shkoly, Ser. E&te&tv. Nauk, no 3, 29-31. 14) (1982) An imbedding theorem for ranges of convolution operators on a finite interval and operators of potential type, I and II. (Russian). lzv. Vyuh. Uchehn. Zaved. Mat. , no 1 , 5�3 and no 2, 49-59. 15) (1983) The generalized Abel equation and the plane contact problem of the plasticity theory with power strengthening of the material with variable coefficient of friction (Russian). lzv. Akad. Nauk Armyan. SSR, Ser. Meh., no 2, 19-25. 16) ( 1983) Multidimensional integrals of Riemann-Liouville type and Riesz potentials in a half-space (Russian) . Rostov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI 23.06.83, no 3414, 34 p. 1 7) {1983) One-dimensional representation, inversion and certain properties of Riesz potentials of radial functions (Russian). Mat. Zametki, 34, no 4, 521-533. 18) {1984) Riesz potentials and operators of Riemann-Liouville type in a half space (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 279, no 1, 30-34. 19) {1984) One-sided ball potentials and the inversion of Riesz potentials on an n dimensional ball or its exterior (Russian). Rostov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI 18.07.84, no 5150, 48 p. 20) ( 1985) The method of one-sided potentials in the theory of some classes of differentiable functions of fractional smoothness and the inversion of the potentials on the half-space (Russian). Rostov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI 26.02.85, no 1456, 63 p. 21) {1985) Inversion of Riesz potentials on an n-dimensional ball or its exterior (Russian). lzv. Vy&&h. Uchehn. Zaved. Mat., no 6, 81-85. 22) (1986) The fractional integrals and Riesz potentials with radial density in the spaces with power weight (Russian). lzv. Akad. Nauk Armyan. SSR, Ser. Mat., 21, no 5, 488-503. 23) (1986) On a method of characterization and inversion of Bessel and Riesz potentials (Russian). lzv. Vy&&h. Uchehn. ZatJed. Mat., no 5, 59-68. 24) {1986) The characterization and inversion of Bessel potentials by means of hypersingular integrals with weighted differences (Russian). Differenbial'nye Uravne niya, 22, no 10, 180�1818.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
931
25 ) ( 1986) The characterization and inversion of Bessel potentials with Lp-densities on Rn and in the half-space (Russian). Soobsl&cl&. Akad. Nauk Gru.zin. SSR, 124, no 2, 245-248. 26) ( 1987) The inversion of the potentials in � by means of the Gauss-Weierstrass integrals (Russian). Mat. Zametki, 41 , no 1 , 34--42. 27) ( 1987) The spaces of Lizorkin type on the half-line and fractional integration of generalized functions (Russian). In Integral Equat. and Integral Operators, Mezl&vuzov. sb . naucl&. stat., Krasnodar: Kubansk. i Rostov. Univ., 81-88. 28) ( 1988) One-sided potentials, the spaces L�, r and the inversion of Riesz and Bessel potentials in the half-space. Math. Nacl&r., 1 36, 177-208. Rubin, B.S. and Volodarskaya, G.F. 1 ) (1979) An imbedding theorem for convolutions on a finite interval and its application to integral equations of the first kind (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 244, no 6, 1322-1326. Ruhovets, A.M. and Uflyand, Ya.S. 1 ) {1966) On a class of dual integral equations and their applications to the theory of elasticity (Russian). Prikl. mat. i mel&., 30, Vyp. 2, 271-277 {Transl. in J. Appl. Math., Mecl&., 1966 ( 1967) , 30, 334-341 } . Ruiz, F.J . and Torrea, T.L. 1 ) ( 1986) Weighted and vector-valued inequalities for potential operators. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 295, no 1, 213-232. Rusak, V.N. 1 ) ( 1983) Approximation by rational operators of functions having a fractional derivative of bounded variation (Russian) . Vestsi Akad. Navuk BSSR, Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Navuk, no 6, 20-26. 2 ) ( 1984 ) Approximation by rational operators of Fourier type of the periodical functions represented in the convolution form (Russian). Ibid., no 2, 25-32. 3) ( 1985) Rational approximation of periodic functions having a piecewise-convex derivative (Russian) . In Reports of the extended sessions of a seminar of the I.N. Veha Inst. A ppl. Math. (Tbilisi, 1965) . Tbiliss. Gos. Univ., 1, no 2, 118-121. Rusev, P.K. 1 ) (1979) On the representation of the analitycal functions by means of the series of Laguerre polynomials (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 249, no 1, 57-59. Rusia, K.C. 1 ) ( 1966) An integral equation involving generalized Laguerre polynomial. Math. Japan., 1 1 , 15-18. 2 ) ( 1966) An integral equation involving Jacobi polynomial. Proc. Nat. A cad. Sci. India, A 36, no 4, 933-936. 3) ( 1967) Some integral equations and integrals. Ibid., A 37, no 1, 67-70. 4) ( 1969) An integral equation involving confluent hypergeometric function. Math. Student, 37, no 1-4, 55-58. 5 ) (1969) A class of integral equations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India, A 39, 334-336. 6) ( 1969) A class of integral equations involving confluent hypergeometric function. Ibid., A 39, 349-354. 7) ( 1969) On some integral equations involving Jacobi polynomials. Ibid., A 39, 381-386. Saakyan, -B.A. 1 ) (1974) Differential operators of fractional order, and associated (Pj )-absolutely monotone functions (Russian). Izv. Akad. Nauk Armyan. SSR, Ser. Mat., 9, no 4, 265-307. 2 ) ( 1975 ) Differential operators of fractional order, and associated (Pj , Wj )-absolutely monotone functions (Rissian). Uchen. Zap. Erevan. Univ., Estestv. Nauki, 1 ( 128) , 3-9. 3) (1988) On a generalized Taylor-Maclaurian-type formula (Russian). Ibid., 3, 30-40. Sadikova, R.H. 1 ) { 1979) Inequalities for sourcewise representable functions (Russian) . Izv. Vyul&. Ucl&ebn. Zaved. Mat., no 11, 61-64.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
932
Sadowska, D. 1) (1959) Equation int�erentielle d'Abel. B•ll. Soc. •ci. et lettru Lodz. Cl. 3, 10, no 6, 1-17. Saigo, M. 1) (1978) A remark on integral operators involving the Gauss hypergeometric functions. Mt�.th. Rep. KJ••It.• Univ., 1 1 , no 2, 135-143. 2) (1979) A certain boundary value problem for the Euler-Darboux equation. Mt!.tlt.. Jt�.pt!.n., 24, no 4, 377-385. 3) (1980) On the Holder continuity of the generalized fractional integrals and derivatives. Mt�.tlt.. Rep. KJ••It.• Univ., 12, no 2, 55-62. 4) (1980) A certain boundary value problem for the Euler-Darboux equation, ll. Mt!.tlt.. Jt�.pt!.n., 25, no 2, 211-220. 5) (1981) A certain boundary value problem for the Euler-Darboux equation, III. 16id., 26, no 1, 103-119. 6) (1981) A generalization of fractional calculus and its applications to Euler-Darboux equation. In Proc. Sfmp. On Frt�.ctiont�.l Ct�.lc•l•• t�.nd it• Appl. (Kyoto, 1981), Kyoto Univ . , Res. lnst. Math. Sci., 33-56. 7) (1985) A generalization of fractional calculus. In Frt!.ctiont�.l Ct�.lc•l••, eds. A.C. McBride, G.F. Roac:h, Boston: Pitman Adv. Publ. Progr., Re•. Note. Mt�.tlt.., 138, 188-198. 8) (1987) A generalization of fractional calculus and boundary value problems for the Euler-Darboux equation. In Proc. Tlt.inl Con/. Diff. Eq•tl.t. t�.nd A ppl. (Rousse , 1985). Sofia: Publ. House Bulg. Acad. Sci., 907-913. 9) (1989) Fractional integrals and derivatives associated with elementary functions and Bessel functions. In Proc. Intern. s,mp. Univt�.lent F.nction•, Frt!.ctiont!.l Ct!.lc•l•• t�.nd their A ppl. (Koriyama, 1988), eds. H.M. Srivastava, S. Owa. Chichester: Ellis Horwood Ltd, 283-306. Saigo, M. and Glaeske, H.-J. 1) (1990) Fractional calculus on space Fp,p · In Proc. Intern. Con/. FrtJctiont�.l Ct�.lc•l•• t�.nd it. A ppl. (Tokyo, 1989), ed. K. Nishimoto. Tokyo: Coll. Engin. Nihon Univ., 207-214. 2) (1990) Fractional calculus operators involving the Gauss function on space Fp,p and Ff, , - Mat!&. Naclt.r., 147, 285-305.
,
Saigo, M., Kant, S. and Koul, C.L . 1) {1990) On generalized fractional integrals involving the H-function associated with a general class of polynomials. F•hoh Univ. Sci. Rep., 20, no 1, 15-21.
Saigo, M. and Raina, B..K. 1) (1988) Fractional calculus operators associated with a general clua of polynomials. 16id., 18, no 1, 15-22. Saitoh, H. 1) (1990) Properties of certain multivalent functiom and an application of fractional calculus. In Proc. Intern. Con/. Frt!.ctiont!.l Calc•l•• t!.nd it. A ppl. (Tokyo, 1989), ed. K . Nishimoto. Tokyo: Coll. Engin. Nihon Univ., 215-220.
Sakalyuk, K.D. 1) (1960) Abel's generalized integral equations (Russian). Doil. A it!. d. Nt�.•i SSSR, 1 3 1 , no 4, 748-751 {'l'l'ansl. in Soviet Mt�.tlt.. Doil., 1960, 1, 332-335}. 2) {1962) Generalization of Abel's integral equation (Russian). Uclt.en. Zt�.p. Ki•lt.inev. Go•. Univ., 50, 95-102. 3) (1963) Integral equations with power, logarithmical and polar kernels solved in the closed form (Russian). Dr. Di... , Kishinev, 94 p. 4) (1965) The generalized Abel integral equation with inner coefficients (Russian). Uclt.en. Zt�.p. Ki•lt.inev. Go•. Univ., 82 (mat.) , 60-68 . Saksena, K.M. 1) (1958) Inversion and representation theorems for a generalised Laplace integral. Pt�.cif. J. Mt�.tlt.., 8, no 3, 597--607. Salahitdinov, M.S. and Mengziyaev, B. 1) (1977) A certain boundary value problem with displacement for a mixed type equation with two lines of degeneracy (Ruuian). Different.it�.l'nJe UrtJvnenif&, 13, no 1 , 133-139.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
933
Salahitdinov, M .S. and Mirsaburov, M. 1) (1981) Some boundary value problems for a hyperbolic equation which degenerate inside the domain (RUSBian). 16id., 1 7, no 1, 129-136. {TransL in DiJ. Eq•at. 1 7 (1981), no 1 , 88-94}. 2) (1982) Two nonlocal boundary value problems for a degenerate hyperbolic equation (Russian) . Ibid., 18, no 1, 116-127 Samko, S.G. 1) (1967) Solution of generalized Abel equation by means of an equation with Cauchy kernel (Russian). Dokl. Ahd. Nad SSSR, 176, no 5, 1019-1022. {Transl. in Soviet Math. Dokl., 6 (1967), 1259-1262}. 2) (1967) On the reduction of certain integral equations of the first kind in the theory of elasticity and hydrodynamics to equati0118 of the second kind (Russian). Prikl. mat. i mel&., 31, no 2, 343-345 3) (1968) To the theory of the generalized Abel integral equation (Russian). In Mater. 7th and 8th na•cl&. con/. a•pir. Ro•to11. uni11., Ser. tocl&n. i ute•t11. nad. (Russian). Rostov-on-Don: lzda.t. Rostov Univ., 56-61. 4) (1968) The generalized Abel equation with the infinite limits (Russian). 16id., 160-165. 5) (1968) The generalized Abel equatiOn and fractional integration operators (Russian). Different.ial'nye Uravnenira, o&, no 2, 298-314. 6) (1968) Noether theory for Abel's generalized integral equation (Russian). Ibid., 315-326. 7) (1969) Abel's generalized equation, Fourier transform, and convolution type equations (Russian) . Doil. Akad. Nad SSSR, 187, no 4, 743-746. {Transl. in So11iet Math. Doil., 10 (1969), no 4, 942-946}. 8) (1969) On the integral modulus of continuity of the potentials with the densities summable on the axis with weight (Russian). In Mat. Analr•i• and Appl., Rostov-on-Don: lzdat. Rostov. Univ., 175-184. 9) (1970) The generalized Abel integral equation on the axis (Russian). lz11. Vyul&. Ucl&ebn. Za11ed. Mat., no 8, 83-93. 10) (1970) Integral equations of the first kind with a kernel of potential type (Russian). In Proc. Con/. on Bo•ndarr Val•e Problem• (Kazan, 1969), Kazan: lzdat. Kazan. Uni• ., 216-220. 11) (1971) Operators of potential type (RUSBian). Doil. Ahd. Na•k SSSR, 196, no 2, 299-301. {Transl. in S011iet Math. Dokl., 12 (1971), no 1, 125-126}. 12) (1971) On integral equations of the first kind with kernels of potential type (Russian). lzv. Vrul&. Ucl&ebn. Zaved. Mat., no 4, 78-86. 13) (1971) A certain clau of potential type operators on the line (Russian). 16id., no 5, 92-100. 14) (1973) The space Ia(Lp) of fractional integrals, and operators of potential-type (Ruuian). lz11. Ahd. Na•ll Armran. SSR, Ser. Mat., 8, no 5, 359-383. 15) (1974) On the boundedness of the truncation operator in the space of fractional integrals (Russian). Mat. Analr•i• and A ppl., Rostov-on-Don: lzdat. Rostov. Univ., 5, 16-19. 16) (1975) Integral equations of convolution type of the first kind with a power kernel (Russian). Jzv. Vr••h. Ucl&e6n. Zaved. Mat., no 4, 60-67. 17) (1976) On spaces of Riesz potentials (Russian) lzv. Ahd. Na•k SSSR, Ser. Mat., o&O, no 5, 1143-1172. {Transl. in Math. USSR lzve•tira, 10 (1976), no 5, 1089-11 17}. 18) (1976) The spaces L;,r (R"), and hypersingular integrals (Russian). Ve•t.i Akad. Nav.k BSSR, Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Navd, no 2, 34-41. 19) (1978) Generalized Riesz potentials (Russian). Semin. ln•t. Prill. Mat. T6ili•d. Univ., Vyp. 11, 35--44 . 20) (1977) The spaces L;,r (R") and hypersingular integrals (Russian). Studia Math. (PRL), 61, no 3, 193-230. 21) (1977) Generalized Riesz potentials and hypersingular integrals, their symbols and inversion (Russian). Dokl. Ahd. Nad SSSR, 232, no 3, 528-531. {Transl. in So11iet Math. Dokl., 18 (1977), no 1, 97-101}.
934
BIBLIOGRAPHY 22) {1977) Spherical potentials, spherical Riesz differentiation, and their applications (Russian). Izv. Vy••h. Uchehn. Zaved. Mat., no 2, 135-139. 23) (1977) On the characterization of the range /01(Lp ) of Riesz potentials (Russian). lzv. Akad. Nauk A rmran. SSR, Ser. Mat., 12, no 5, 32�334. 24) {1977) The classes 0.\ (R"), and multipliers in the space /01 (Lp ) of Riesz potentials (Russian). lzv. Severo-Kavkaz. Nauch. T•entra Vyuh. Shkoly, Ser. E•te•tv. Nauk, no 3, 13-17. 25) (1977) Test functions vanishing on a given set, and division by a function (Russian). Mat. Zametki, 21, no 5, 677-689. 26) (1978) Hypersingular integrals with homogeneous characteristics (Russian) . Trudy ln•t. Prikl. Mat. Tbili•. Go1. Univ., 5/6, 235-249. 27) (1978) The methods of inversion of the potential type operators, and the equations with involution operators and their applications (Russian) . Dr. Di••., Moscow, Mat. lnst. Steklov, 295 p. 28) (1980) Generalized Riesz potentials and hypersingulM integrals with homogeneous chal'acteristics; their symbols and inversion (Russian). Trudy Mat. ln•t. Steklov, 156, 157-222. {Transl. in Proc. Steklo11 ln•t. Mat., 1983, Issue 2, 173-243}. 29) (1982) Denseness of Lizorkin-type spaces •v in Lp (R" ) (Russian). Mat. Zametki, 3 1 , no 6, 655-665. 30) (1983) Singular integrals over a sphere and the construction of the characteristic by the given symbol (Russian). lzv. Vy••h. Uchebn. Zat�ed. Mat., no 4, 26-42. 31) {1934) Hyper•ingular integral• and their application• (Russian). Rostov-on-Don: lzdat. Rostov. Univ .; 208 p. 32) (1985) One- and multidimensional integral equations of the first kind with a weak singularity in the kernel (Russian). In Proc. commemorative •eminar on boundary valve problem• (Minsk, 1961), Minsk: Universitetskoe, 103-105. 33) (1985) The coincidence of Griinwald-Letnikov differentiation with other forms of fractional diff�ntiation. The periodic and the nonperiodic cases (Russian). In Report• oJ the �ztended •u•ion• of the •eminar of the l.N. Veha ln•t. Appl. Math. (Tbilisi, 1985). Tbiliss. Gos. Univ., 1, no 1 , 183-186. 34) (1990) Hypersingular integrals and fractional order differences (Russian). Trudy Mat. ln•t. Steklo11, 192, 164-182. 35) (1990) The multidimensional fractional integro-differentiation and the Griinwald Letnikov approach to fractional calculus. In Proc. Intern. Con}. Fractional Calculu1 and it• A ppl. (Tokyo, 1989), ed. K. Nishimoto. Tokyo: Coli. Engin. Nihon Univ., 221-225. 36) (1991 ) On denseness of the spaces •v of Lizorkin type in the spaces L;;(R" ) with mixed norm (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 319, no 3, 567-569.
Sam.ko, S.G. and Chuven.kov, A.F. 1) (1975) On the Riesz potentials in the Orlicz spaces (Russian). Mat. A naly•i• and Appl., Rostov-on-Don: Izdat. Rostov. Univ. no 7, 15o-156. Samko, S.G. and Murdaev, H.M. 1) (1987) Weighted Zygmund-type estimates for fractional differentiation and integration and its applications (Russian). Trudy Mat. ln•t. Steklov, 1 80, 197-198. {Transl. in Proc. Steklov ln•t. Math., 1989, no 3, 233-235}. Samko, S.G. and Umarkhadzhiev, S.M. 1) (1980) Characterization of the space of Riesz potentials in terms of higher derivatives (Russian). Izv. Vyuh. Uchebn. Zaved. Mat., no 1 1 , 79-82. 2) (1980) Characterization of a space Ia(Lp ) of Riesz potentials in terms of derivatives of order (a). (Russian). Rostov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI 18.07.80, no 3165, 21 p. 3) (1985) Applications of hypersingular integrals to multidimensional integral equations of the first kind (Russian). Trudr Mat. ln•t. Steklov, 172, 29�312. {Transl. in Proc. Stdlov ln•t. Math, 1987, Issue 3, 325-339}.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
935
Samko, S.G. and Vasll'ev, I.L . 1) (1981) Integral equations with analytic kernels of potential type (Russian). Minsk, Dep. in VINITI 1 .07.81, no 3227, 22 p. Samko, S.G. and Yakubov, A.Ya. 1) (1984) Zygmund estimate for a singular integral with a rapidly decreasing power weight (Russian). lzv. VJ••k. UckdA. Zuetl. Mat., no 12, 42-51. 2) (1985) Zygmund type estimates for hypersingular integrals (RUIISian). Rostov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI 19.03.85, no 1966, 22 p. 3) (1985) Zygmund estimate for moduli of continuity of fractional order of a conjugate function (Russian). lzv. v,.,A. UckdA. Zavetl. Mat., no 12, 49-53. 4) (1986) Zygmund estimate for bypersingular integrals in the cue of moduli of continuity of fractional order (Russian ). ln. Severo-Kuhz. Na•ck. Tu•tra v,,.A. SUolJ, Ser. E•te•tv. Naw.l:, no 3, 42-47. Sampson, C.H. 1) (1968) A characterization of parabolic Lebesgue spaces. Dr. Diss., Rice Univ., 91 p., Diu. Abltr•, 1986, 29, no 6, pos . 2125-B. Sargent, W.L.G. 1) (1946) A mean value theorem involving Cesaro means. Proc. London Math. Soc., Ser. !, -49, 227-240. 2) (1950) On fractional integrals of a function integrable in the Ces&ro-Perron sense. 16id., 51, no 1, 46-80. 3) (1951) On the continuity (C) and integrability (CP) of fractional integrals. 16id., 52, no 4, 253-270. Sato, T. 1) (1935) On Abel's integral equation. Mem. Coli. Sci. Kroto, 18, 63-78. Savelova, T.I. 1) (1980) On stable differentiation of functions (Russian). Z. Vrckill. Mat. Mat. Fiz., 20, no 2, 501-505. · Sawyer, E. 1) (1984) A two weight weak type inequality for fractional integrals. Tran1. A mer. Math. Soc., 2 8 1 , no 1 , 339-345. 2) (1988) A characterization of two weight norm inequalities for fractional and Poisson integrals. 77-an•. Amer. Math. Soc., 308, no 2, 533-545. Saxena, R.K. 1) (1966) An inversion formula for the Varma transform. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 62, no 3, 467-471. 2) (1966) An inversion formula for a kernel involving a Mellin-Bames type integral. Proc. A mer. Math. Soc., 17, no 4, 771-779. 3) (1967) A formal solution of certain dual integral equations involving H-functions. Proc. Cambridge PAil. Soc., 63, no 1, 171-178. 4) (1967) On the formal solution of dual integral equations. Proc. A mer. Math. Soc., 18, no 1 , 1-6. 5) (1967) On fractional integration operators. Math. Z., 96 , no 4, 288-291 . Saxena, R.K. and K u mbhat, R.K. 1) (1973) A generalization of Kober operators. Vijnana Pari1kad An.,andkan Patril:a, 16, no 1, 31-36. 2) (1974) Integral operators involving H-function. Indian J. Pure and Appl. Ma.th., 5 , no 1 , 1-6. 3) (1975) Some properties of generalized Kober operators. Vijna.na Pari1had A nw.1andhan Patril:a, 18, no 2, 139-150. Saxena, R.K. and Modi, G.C. 1) (1980) Multidimensional fractional integration operators associated with bypergeometric functions. Nat. Aca.d. Sci. Lett., 3, no 5, 153-157. Saxena, R.K. and Sethi, P.L. 1) (1973) Relations between generalized Hankel and modified bypergeometric function operators. Proc. India• Acad. Sci., A 78, no 6, 267-273. Saxena, V.P. 1) (1970) Inversion formulae to certain integral equations involving H-function. Portugal. Math., 29, no 1 , 31-42
936
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Schneider, W.R. 1) (1982) Tho general solution of a non-linear integral equation of convolution type. J. Appl. Matl. and PAr•., 33, no 1, 140-142. Schneider, W.R. and Wyu, W. 1) (1989) Fractional diffusion and wave equations. J. Math. PAr•., 30, no 1 , 134-144. Schwartz, J.T. 1) (1961) A remark on inequalities of Calderon-Zygmund type for vector-valued functions. Comm. Pure and Appl. Matl., 14:, no 4, 785-199 . Schwartz, L. 1) (1950-1951) Theorie des distributions. In 2 vola. Paris: Hermann, Vol. 1: 1950, 162 p.; Vol. 2: 1951, 169 p.
Seitkuieva, A. 1) (1980) Integro-difl'erential equations with a kernel which has a weak singularity (Ruuian). In Studiu in integro-differential etuation•. Frunze: Dim, no 13, 132-135. Sekine, T. 1) (1987) On new generalized classes of analytic functions with negative coefficients. Rep. Re•. In•t. Sci. Tecln. Nilon Univ., no 32, 1-26. 2} (1990) On distortion theorems for fractional calculus. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Fractio•al Calculu• and iu Appl. (Tokyo, 1989}, ed. K. Nishimoto. Tokyo: Coli. Engin. Nihon Univ., 232-237. Sekine, T., Owa, S. and Nishimoto, K. 1) (1986) An application of the fractional calculus. J. Coli. Engng. Nilon Univ., B-2'7, 31-37. Semyanistyi, V.I. 1) (1960} On some integral transformations in Euclidean space (Ruuian) . Do'A:I. A'A:ad. Nad SSSR, 134:, no 3, 536-539. Senator, K. 1} (19n) Schauder and Lp estimates for a certain class of integro-differential boundary value problems. B·dl. L 'Acad. polon. Sci., Ser. •ci. matl., a•tron. et pAr•., 19, no 5, 359-363. Sethi, P.L . and Banerji, P.K. 1) (1974-1975) Fractional integration and dual integral equations. J. Indian Matl. Soc., 38, no 1-4, 359-363. Sewell, W.E. 1) (1935) Generalized derivatives and approximation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, Ser. 2, 21, 255-258. 2) (1937) Generalized derivatives and approximation by polynomials. 7\-an•. Amer. Matl. Soc., 14:, no 1, 84-123. Shah, M. 1) (1972} Two integral transform pain involving H-function. Gla•ni'A: Matem., '7, no 1 , 57-65. Shanmugam, T.N. 1) (1990) A note on convolution, differential subordination and fractional calculus. In Proc. IRtern. Conf. Fractional Calcul•• and it• A ppl. (Tokyo, 1989}, ed. K. Nishimoto, Tokyo: Coll. Engin. Nihon Univ., 238-244. Shapiro, H.S. 1) (19n) Topics in approximation theory. Lect. Notu Matl., 18'7, 1-275. Sharma, S. 1) (1979} Certain fractional q-integral operaton. Indian J. Pure and Appl. Ma.tl., 10, no 5, 581-589. Sharpley, R. 1) (1976) Fractional integration in Orlicz spaces. Proc. A mer. Matl. Soc., 59, no 1, 99-106.
Shelkovnikov, F.A. 1) (1951) The generalized Cauchy formula (Ruuian) . U•peli Mat. Nad, 6, no 3 (43), 157-159.
Shermergor, T.D. 1) (1966) On the use of the operators of fractional differentiation for the desaiption of the hereditary properties of the materials (Ruuian). Pri'A:I. m el. i teUR. fizi'A:a, no 6, 118-121. Shinbrot, M. 1) (1971) Fractional derivatives of solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. AreA. Ratio•. Mecla. and Analr•i•, 4:0, no 2, 139-154.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
937
Shostak, R.Ya. 1 } ( 1952) Aleksei Vasil'evich Letnik.ov (Russian). In ]&tor.-Mo.t. luledov. , Moscow: Gos. lzda.t. Tehn.-Teor. Lit., 167-238. Sidorov, Yu.V., Fedoryuk M.V. and Shabunin, M.I. 1 } ( 1982 ) Lecture& in the theory of function& of o. comple� vo.riable (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 468 p. Simak, L.A. 1 ) Fractional integro-differential calculus. The questions of the theory, modelling and applications (Russian). Preprint no 98, Kiev: lnst. probl. modelir. in energ. Akad. Nauk Ukrain. SSR, 57 p. Singh, B. 1 ) (1965 ) The generalized Erdelyi-Kober operators and self-reciprocal functions. Ann. Soc. Sci. Bru�elle&, Ser. 1, 79, no 2, 117-132. 2 ) ( 1975 ) A note on fractional integration. Bol. Acad. cienc., fi•., mat. y no.tur. Venezuela, 33, no 190, 95-97. Singh, C. 1 ) ( 1968} On a convolution transfOrm involving Whittaker's function as its kernel. Math. Japo.n., 13, no 1, 71-74. 2 ) ( 1970) An inversion integral for a Whittaker transform. Riv. mat. Univ. Po.rma, Ser. 2, 11, 277-280. 3) ( 1970) An integral equation with Jacobi polynomial in the kernel. Ibid., Ser. 2, 1 1 , 313-316. 4) ( 1975 ) On a class of integral equations. Ibid., Ser. 4, 1, 1-7. Singh, Rattan 1 ) ( 1970) An inversion formula for Fox H-transform. Proc. No.t. Acad. Sci. India, A 40, no 1, 57-64. Singh, R.P. 1 } ( 1967) An �ntegral equation involving generalized Legendre polynomials. Math. Student, 35, no 1-4, 81-84. Sintsov, D .M. 1 ) ( 1891 ) Bernoulli functions with an arbitrary index (Russian). lzv. Kazan. fiz.-mo.t. o b&hch., 1, no 3, 234-256. Sirota, R.O. and Anderson, T.P. 1 } {1967) Abel integral inverter. Rev. Sci. ln&trum., 38 , no 6, 749-759. Skorikov, A.V. 1 ) ( 1974 ) On the Noethericity of the potential type operators in the Sobolev Slobodetskii space (Russian) . In Mo.t. Analy&i& and it. Appl., Rostov-on-Don: lzdat. Rostov Univ., 6, 136--147. 2 ) (1975) On the characterization of the spaces Lp( O) (Russian) . Mat. Zo.metki, 17, no 5, 691-701. 3) ( 1977) The operators of the hi-potential type in Lp ( R2 ) (Russian). In Trudy y oung &cienti&t& of the faculty of higher math. Ro&tov. engin. build. in&t., Dep. in VINITI 05.05.77, no 1780, 32-51 . 4 } ( 1979) Convolution integral equations of the first kind (Russian). Rostov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI 31 .08.79, no 3193, 10 p. Sk6rnik, K. 1 ) ( 1980) On fractional integrals and derivatives of one class of generalized functions (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nad SSSR, 254, no 5, 1085-1087. 2 ) ( 1981 ) On tempered integrals and derivatives of nonnegative orders. Ann. pol on. mo.th., 40, no 1, 47-57. Slater, L .J. 1 ) ( 1966) Generalized Hypergeometric Function•. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 273 p. Sludskii, F. 1 } ( 1889} A.V . Letnikov's life and works (Russian) . Mat. Sb., 14, Vyp. 2, 1-34. Smirnov, M.M. 1 ) ( 1986) Degenerating elliptic and hyperbolic equation& (Russian). Moscow: N auka, 292 p. 2 ) ( 1970) Equation• of mi�ed type (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 295 p. (Transl. in Amer. Math. Soc., Providenoe, R.I., 1978, 232 p.). 3) ( 1977) Degenerate hyperbolic equation• (Russian). Minsk: Vysheishaya Shkola, 158 p.
938
BIBLIOGRAPHY 4) (1981) On a Volterra equation with a hypergeometric function in the kernel (Russian). Ve.ttnik Leningrad. Uniu., Ser. Mat., Mel&., A•tron., Vyp, 3, 117-119. 5) (1982) A solution in closed form of the Volterra equation with a hypergeometric function in the kernel (Russian). Different•ial'nye Uravneniya, 18, no 1, 171-173. 6) (1984) A Volterra integral equation with a hypergeometric function in the kernel (Russian). Ve•tnik Eeningrad. Univ., Ser. Mat., Mel&., A•tron., Vyp. 2, 111-113. 7) (1985) Equation• of mixed type (Russian). Moscow: Vyssh. Shkola, 304 p.
Smirnov, V.I. and Lebedev, N.A. 1) (1964) The con•tructive theory offunction• of a complex varia6le (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 436 p. Smith, C .V.L. 1) {1941) The fractional derivative of a Laplace integral. Duke Math. J., 8, no 1-2, 47-77. Sneddon, I.N. 1) (1960) The elementary solution of dual integral equations. Proc. Gla•gow Math. Auoc., 4, no 3, 108-110. 2) (1962) Fractional integration and dual integral equations. North Carolina State College, A ppl. Math. Re•. Group Raleigh, PSR-6, 40 p. 3) (1966) Mized boundary value problem• in potential theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ., 283 p. 4) {1968) A procedure for deriving inversion formulae for integral transform pairs of a general kind. Gla•gow Math. J., 9, no 1, 67-77. 5) (1975) The use in mathematical physics of Erdelyi-Kober operators and of some of their generalizations. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Fractional Calculu• and it• Appl. (New Haven, 1974), ed. B. Ross, Lect. Note• Math., 457, 37-79. 6) {1979) The use of operators of fractional integration in applied mathematics. In A ppl. m ech. •er. Warszawa, Poznan: PWN, 42 p. Sobolev, S.L. 1) {1938) On a theorem of functional analysis (Russian). Mat. 56. , 4, no 3, 471-497. 2) (1950) Som e application• of functional analy•i• in mathematical phy•ic• (Russian) . Leningrad: lzdat. Leningrad. Gos. Univ., 255 p. 3) {1974) IJ&trodwction tq the theory of cubature form•lae (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 808 p. Sobolev, S.L. and Nikol'skii, S.M. 1) (1963) Imbedding theorems (Russian) . In Proc. Fourth A ll- Union Mat. Congr., Vol. 1, (Leningrad, 1961), Leningrad: Izdat. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 227-242.
Sohi, N .S. 1) (1990) Distortion theorems involving certain operators of fractional calculus on a class of p-valent functions. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Fractional Calculu• and it. A ppl. (Tokyo, 1989), ed. K. Nishimoto, Tokyo: Coll. Engin. Nihon Univ., 245-252. Sohncke, L. 1) (1867). Ueber den Zusammenhang hypergeometrischer Reihen mit hoheren Dift'erentialquotienten und Vielfachen Integralen. Programm K oniglichen Friedrich• Collegium zu Konig•bergin Pr., no 26-27, 3-30. Solonnikov, V .A. 1) {1962) A simple proof of an inequality of Hardy and Littlewood for fractional integrals (Russian). Ve•tnik Leningrad. Univ., Ser. Mat., Meh. A •tron., Vyp. 13, 150-153 Soni, K. 1) {1968) Fractional integrals and Hankel transforms. Duke Math. J., 35, no 2, 313-319. 2) {1969) A note on Fourier kernels. Amer. Math. Month., 76, no 2, 174-176. 3) {1970) A unitary transform related to some integral equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 1 , no 4, 426-436. 4) {1970) A Sonine transform. Duke Math. J., 37, no 3, 431-438. 5) (1971) An integral equation with Bessel function kernel. Ibid., 38, no 1, 175-180.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
939
Sonine, N.Ya. 1) (1870) Report on differentiation with an arbitrary index (Russian) . In Proc. Second Congre•• of Ruaaian Naturaliau, 2, 18-21. 2) (1872) On differentiation with an arbitrary index (Russian) . Mat. 56. , 8, Vyp. 1 , 1-36. 3) (1880) Recherches sur les fonctions cylindriques et le developpement des fonctions continues en series. Math. A nn., 1 8 , 1-80. 4) (1884) Generalization of an Abel fonnula (R'WIBian). In Notu of mat. aect. of NovoroaaiiaJ:. aoc. of naturali•t., 5, 143-150. 5) (1884) Sur Ia generalization d'une formule d'Abel. Acta Math., "" 171-176. 6) (1954) Inveatigation• of crlinder function• and •pecial polrnomial• (RU88ian). Moecow: Gos. lzdat. Tehn.-Teor. Lit., 244 p. Spain, B. 1) (1940) Interpolated derivatives. Proc. RoJ. Soc. Edinburgh,
80, no 2, 134-140.
Sprinkhuizen-Kuyper, I.G. 1) (1979) A fractional integral operator corresponding to negative powers of a certain second-order differential operator. J. Math. A nal. and Appl., 72 , no 2, 674-702. 2) (1979) A fractional integral operator coiTesponding to negative powers of a second-order partial differential operator. Report TW 1�1/79. Amsterdam: Math. Centnun, 44 p.
Srivastav, R.P. 1 ) (1966) On certain integral equations of convolution type with Bessel-function kernels. Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc., Ser. 2, 1 5 , no 2, 111-116. Srivastava, H.M. 1) (1968) Fractional integration and inversion fonnulae associated with the generalized Whittaker transfonn. Pacif. J. Math., 28, no 2, 375-377. 2) (1972) A class of integral equations involving the H-function as kernel. Proc. K ongl. Nederl. AJ:ad. Weten., A 7 5 , no 3, 212-220. 3) (1976) An integral equation involving the confluent hypergeometric function of several complex variables. Appl. Anal., 5, no 4, 251-256. 4) (1983) The Weyl fractional integral of a general class of polynomials. Boll. Unione mat. ital., 132, no 1 , 219-228. 5) (1989) Some recent developments in the theory of generalized hypergeometric functions. In Complex Analr•i• and Appl. '81 (Varna, 1987). Sofia: Publ. Mouse Bulg. Acad. Sci., 495-516. 6) (1989) Univalent functions, fractional calculus and associated generalized hypergeometric functions. In Proc. Intern. Srmp. Univalent Function•, Fractional Calculu• and their Appl. (Koriyama, 1988), eds. H.M. Srivastava, S. Owa, Chichester: Ellis Horwood Ltd, 329-354. 7) ( 1990) The use of fractional calculus and other operational techniques in obtaining generating functions. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Fractional Calculua and ita Appl. (Tokyo, 1989) , ed. K. Nishimoto. Tokyo: Coli. Engin. Nihon Univ., 253-261. Srivastava, H.M. and Buschman, R.G. 1) (1973) Composition of fractional integral operators involving Fox's H-function. Acta Mexic. cienc. J tecnol., 7, no 1-3, 21-28. 2) (1974) Some convolution integral equations. Proc. Kongl. Nederl. AJ:ad. Weten., A 77, no 3, 211-216. 3) (1977) Convolution Integral Equation• with Special Fw.nction K ernel•. New Delhi, Ban.galore: Wiley Eastern, 164 p. Srivastava, H.M. and Owa, S. 1) (1984) An application of the fractional derivative. Math. Japan., 29, no 3, 383-389. 2) (1985) An application of the fractional calculus. In Fractional Calculua, eds. A.C. McBride, G .F. Roach. Boston: Pitman Adv. Publ. Progr., Re•. Note• Math., 138, 199-212. 3) (1986) A new class of analytic functions with negative coefficients. Comment. Math. Univ. Sancti Pauli, 35, no 2, 175-188. . 4) (1986) A certain one-pMameter additive family of operators defined on analytic functions. J. Math. Anal. and Appl., 1 18, no 1, 80-87.
940
BIBLIOGRAPHY 5) (1986) Some operational techniques in the theory of analytic functions. Mat. Ve•nik, B eogra.tl, 38, no 4, 587-595. 6) (1987) Some applications of fractional calculus operaton to certain classes of analytic and multivalent functions. J. Math. A nal. anti Appl., 122, no 1, 187-196. 7) (1987) Some characterization and distortion theorema involving fractional calculus, generalized hypergeometric functions, Hadamard products, linear operators, and certain subclasses of analytic functions. Nagora Math. J., 106, 1-28.
Srivastava, H.M., Owa, S. and Nishimoto, K. 1) (1984) A note on a certain class of fractional d.ifferintegral equations. J. Coli. Engng. Nihon Univ., B-25, 69--73. Srivastava, H.M. and Saigo, M. 1) (1987) Multiplication of fractional calculus operators and boundary value problems involving the Euler-Darboux equation. J. Math. Anal. anti A ppl., 121, no 2, 325-369. Srivastava, H.M., Saigo, M. and Owa, S. 1) (1966) A class of distortion theorems involving certain operators of fractional calculus. lbitl., 131, no 2, 412-420. Srivastava, H.M., Sekine, T., Owa, S. and Nishimoto, K. 1) (1986) Fractional derivatives and fractional integrals of certain subclasses of starlike and convex functions. J. Coli. Engng. Nih on Univ., B-27, 39-46. Srivastava, H.M., Shen, C.Y. and Owa, S. 1) (1989) A linear fractional calculus operator and its applications to certain subclasses of analytic functions. J. Math. Anal. a.ntl Appl., 1-i3, no 1, 138-147. Srivastava, K.J. 1) (1957) Fractional integration and Meijer transform. Ma.th. Z., 67, no 5, 404-412. 2) (1957-1958) Fractional integration and the wp,v-transform. Rentl. Sem. Mat. Univ. e Politecn. tli Torino, lT, 201-208. 3) (1959) Self-reciprocal function and wp,v-transform. B•ll. Calc•tta Math. Soc., 51, no 2, 57-65. Srivastava, K.N. 1) (1961-1962) On some integral transfonns. Math. Japan., 6, no 3-4, 65-72. 2) (1963) A claaa of integral equations involving ultraspherical polynomials as kernels. Proc. A mer. Ma.th. Soc., 1-i, no 6, 932-940. 3) (1964) Inversion integrals involving Jacobi's polynomials. 16itl., 15, no 4, 635--638. 4) (1964) On some integral equations involving Jacobi polynomials. Math. Ja.pa.n., 9, 85-88. 5) (1964) Integral equations involving a confluent hypergeometric function as kernel. J. A "'"r•e Ma.th., 13, 391-397. 6) (1965) A class of integral equations involving Jacobi polynomials as kernel. Proc. Na.t. Acatl. Sci. lntlia, A 35, no 2, 221-226. 7) (1965) On some integral transfonns involvong Jacobi functions. Ann. polon. ma.th., 16, no 2, 195-199. 8) (1965) Fractional integration and integral equations with polynomial kernels. J. London Math. Soc., -iO, no 3, 435-440. 9) (1966) A class of integral equations involving Laguerre polynomials as kernel. Proc. Etlinbrgh Math. Soc., Ser. 2, 1 5, no 1 , 33-36. 10) (1966) On integral equations involving Whittaker's function. Proc. Gltugow Ma.th. A ••oc., T, no 3, 125-127. 11) (1968) On some triple integral equations involving Legendre functions of im� argument. J. of M.A . C. T., 1, 54-67. Srivastava, R. 1) (1990) The multidimensional Weyl fractional integral of certain classes of polynomials. In Proc. Intern. Con/. Fractional Calc•l•• anti it• Appl. (Tokyo, 1989), ed. K. Nishimoto, Tokyo: Coil. Engin. Nihon Univ., 262-269.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
941
2) (1989) Some applications of fractional calculus. In Proc. Intern. SJmp. Univalent j.nction•, Fractional Calculu• and their Appl. (Koriyama, 1988). Eds. H.M. Srivastava, S. Owa, Chichester: Ellis Horwood Ltd, 371-382. Srivastava, T.N. and Singh, Y.P. 1) (1968) On Maitland's generalized Bessel function. Canad. Math. Bull., 11, no 5, 739-741. Starovoitov, A.P. 1) (1984) Rational approximation of functions having a derivative of bounded variation (Ruuian). Doil. Ahd. Nad BSSR, 28, no 2, 104-106. 2) (1985) Rational approximation of functions representable as an integral of fractional order in the Riemann-Liouville eense (RWJSian). 16id., 29, no 12, 1079-1081. 3) (1985) Rational approximation of functions in wr v[a, b] (RU88ian). In Report. of the ertended •u•ion• of the •eminar of the I.N. Veba In•t. Appl. Math. (Tbilisi, 1985). Tbiliss. Gos. Univ., 1, no 2, 129-132. 4) (1986) On the rational approximation of the functions differentiable in the Riemann Liouville sense (RU88ian). In TrudJ Vtoroi Saratov. zimnei •hkolJ: Theof11 of Function• and Appro%imation• (Saratov, 1984), pt 3, 99-102. Stechkin, S.B. 1) (1951) Order of the best approximations of continuous functions (Russian). Izv. Akad. Nad SSSR, Ser. Mat., 15, 21�242. 2) (1958) On the best approximation of certain classes of periodic functions by trigonometric polynomials (RU88ian ). 16id., 20, no 5, 643--648. ·
Stein, E.M. 1) (1961) The characterization of functions arising as potentials, I. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 6'7, no 1, 102-104. 2) (1973) Singular integral• and differentialiabilitJ propertiea of function• (RU88ian). Moscow: Mir, 342 p. (English ed. in Princeton Univ. Press, 1970). Stein, E.M. and Weiss, G. 1) (1958) Fractional integrals on n-dimensional Euclidean space. J. Math. and Mech., '7, no 4, 503-514. 2) (1960) On the theory of harmonic functions of several vMiables, I: The theory of HP spaces. A cta Math., 103, no 1-2, 25--62. 3) (1974) Introduction to Fourier analraia on Euclidean apace• (RU88ian). Moscow: Mir, 334 p. (English ed. in Princeton Univ. Press , 1971). Stein, E.M. and Zygmund, A. 1). (1960-1961) Smoothness and differentiability of functions. Ann. Univ. Sci. Budapeat, Eotvo•. Sect. Math., 3-4 , 295-307. 2) (1965) On the fractional differentiability of functions. Proc. London Math. Soc., Ser. 3, 14a, 24�264. 3) (1967) Boundedness of translation inval'iant operators on Holder spaces and .LP-spaces. A nn. MAth., 85, no 2, 337-349. Steinig, J . 1) (1970) The changes of sign of fractional integrals. MAth. Z., 116, no 3, 183-190. Stepanets, A.I. 1) (1987) ClauificAtion And appro%imAtion of periodic fu.nctiona (Russian). Kiev: Naukova Dumb, 268 p. 2) (1989) A new classification of periodic functions and their approximation. In BAnAch Center Publ. vol. !!. Appro%im. And Funct. SpAce• (Warsaw, 1988), ed. Zb. Ciesielski. Wanaw: PWN-Polish Sci. Publ., 437-447. Stepanov, V.D. 1) (1988) Two-weighted estimates for Riemann-Liouville integrals, I . Preprint, Vladivostok: Vychisl. Tsentr Dal'nevost. Otdel. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 32 p. 2) (1988) Two-weighted estimates for Riemann-Liouville integrals, II. 16id., 26 p. 3) (1988) Two-weighted estimates for Riemann-Liouville integrals. Cedoal. Ahd. Ved. MAt. U•tav., Praga, 28 p. 4) (1990) Two-weighted estimates for Riemann-Liouville integrals (RU88ian) Izv. AkAd. NAui SSSR, Ser. MAt., 54, no 3, 645-656.
942
BIBLIOGRAPHY 5 ) ( 1990) On weight inequalities of Hardy type for Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals. (Russian) Si6ird. Matemat. Zhnna/ 31 , no 3, 186-197.
Strichartz, R.S. 1 ) ( 1972) Multipliers for spherical harmonic expansions. Tran•. Amer. Math. Soc., 167, no 1 , 115-124. 2) ( 1980) Bounded mean oscillation and Sobolev spacea. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 29, no 4, 539-558. 3) ( 1990) HP Sobolev spaces. Colloq. Math., 60/61, 129-139.
Stromberg, J .-0. and Wheeden, R.L. 1 ) ( 1985) Fractional integrals on weighted HP- and V-spaces. Tran•. .Amer. Math. Soc., 287, no 1 , 293-321 . 2 ) ( 1986) Kemel estimates for fractional integrals with polynomial weights. St•tlia Math. (PRL), 8-', no 2, 133--i57. Stuloff, M. 1 ) ( 1951 ) Die Differentiation beliebiger reeller Ordnung. Math. Ann., 122, 4()(}-410.
Sun' Yung-Sheng 1) ( 1959) On the best approximation of the periodic differentiable functions by the trigonometric polynomials (Russian) . lzv. .Ahtl. Nad SSSR, Ser. Mat., 23 , no 1, 67-92.
Sunouchi, G. 1 ) ( 1957) Some theorems on fractional integration. Tohob Math. J., 9, no 3, 307-317. Swaroop, R. 1) ( 1964 ) On a generalization of the Laplace and the Stieltjes transformations. Ann. Soc. Sci. B"zellu, Ser. 1., 78, no 2, 105-112. Ta Li 1 ) ( 1960) A new clasa of integral transforms. Proc. A mer. Math. Soc., 1 1 , no 2, 290-298. 2) ( 1961 ) A note on integral transforms. 16itl., 12, no 6, 556. Taberski, R. 1 ) ( 1976) Two indirect approximation theorems. Demon•tr. Math., 9, no 2, 243-255. 2) ( 1977) Approximation of functions possesgsin derivatives of positive orders. Ann. polon. math., 34, no 1, 13-23. 3} ( 1977) Differences, moduli and derivatives of fractional orders. Ann. •oc. math. polon. Comm. math. Prace mat., 19, no 2, 389-400 . 4 ) ( 1979) Indirect approximation theorems in V-metrics ( 1 < p < oo ) . Approximation theory. Banach Center Pdl. Poluh. Sci. Pdl., 4, 247-259. 5 ) ( 1982) Estimates for entire functions of exponential type. F't&nct. et approzim. (PRL), 13, 129-147. 6) ( 1984) 'IIigonometric approximation in the nonns and seminonns. St•tl. Math., 80, DO 3, 197-217. 7) ( 1984) Special convolutions on the real line. F•nct. et aPJfrozim. (PRL), 14, 57-80. 8) ( 1986) Contribution to fractional calculus and exponential approximation. 16itl., 1 5 , 81-1()6. Taibleson, M. and Weiss, G. 1 ) ( 1980) The moleculal- characterization of certain Hardy spaces. A •teri•q•e, 77, 67-151 . Takahashi, S. 1 ) ( 1940) Some new properties of Bohr almost periodic Fourier series. Japon. J. Math., 16, 99-133.
Takano, K. 1 ) ( 1981 ) One-parameter semigroups with infinitesimal generators of fractional powen of the Laplacian on wei&}lted V -spaces. B•ll. Fac. Sci. 16araii Univ., Ser. A, 1 3, 45-55. 2 ) ( 1982) An application of weighted norm inequalities for maximal functions to semigroups of convolution tra.nsfonns on Ifw (.R"). T••ida J. Math., 6, no 2, 151-156.
Talenti , G. 1 ) ( 1965 ) Sui problema di Cauchy per le equazioni a derivate parziali. Ann. mat. p•ra etl appl., 67, 365-394 .
BIBLIOGRAPHY
943
Tamarkin, J.D. 1) (1930) On integrable solutions of Abel's integral equation. Ann. Math., Ser. 2, 31, 219-229. Tanno, Y. 1) (1967) On 168-186.
a
class of convolution transfonn, II. Tohoh Math.
J., 19, no 2,
Tardy, P. 1) (1858) Sui differenziali a indice qualunque. Ann. mat. pura ed appl., 1, 135-148. Tazali, A.Z.-A.M. 1) (1982) Local existence theorems for ordinary differential equations of fractional order. Lect. Note8 Math., 964, 652-665. Tedone,
0.
1) (1914) Su l'inversione di alcuni integrali e Ia integrazione delle equazione a derivate parziali col metodo delle caratteristiche. Atti Reale Accad. Naz. Lincei. Rend. Cl. 8ci. fi•., mat. e natur., Sem. 1° , 23, no 7, 473-480. 2) (1915) Sulla risoluzione di certe equazioni integrali di Volterra. 16id., 24, 544-554.
Telyakovskii, S.A. 1) (1960) Approximation of functions differentiable in Weyl sense by Vallee Poussin sums (Russian). Do/d. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 131 , no 2, 259-262 {Transl. in Soviet Math. Dokl., 1960, 1, 204-243}. 2) (1961 ) Nonns of trigonometrical polynomials and approximation of differentiable functions by averages of their Fourier series, I (Russian). Trudr Mat. ln•t. Steklov, 62 , 61-97. Thielman, H.P. 1) (1934) Note on the use of fractional integration of Bessel functions. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 40, 695-698. Thorin, G.O. 1) (1946) Convexity theorems. Comm. Semin. Math. L 'Univ. Lund. Uppsala, 9, 1-57. 2) (1957) Convexity theorems (Russian) . In Mathematika (Period. 86. perev. inostr. stat.). Moscow: lzdat. lnostr. Lit., 1:3, 43-78. Tihonov, A.N. and Samarsldi, A.A. 1) (1959) Asymptotic expansions of integrals with slowly decreasing kernel (Russian) . Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 126, no 1 , 26-29. Timan, A.F. 1) (1951) A generalization of some results of A.N.Kolmogorov and S.M.Nikol'skii (Russian). 16id., 81, no 4, 509-511. 2) (1958) On Jackson's theorems (Russian). Ukrain. Mat. Z., 10, no 3, 334-336. 3) (1960) Theorg of approximation of function• of a real variable (Russian). Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 624 p. Titchmarsh, E.C. 1) (1937) Introduction to the theory of Fourier integrals. Oxford, 234 p. (Russian ed. in Moscow, Leningrad: Gostehizdat, 1948, 479 p.) . Tonelli, L. 1) (1928) Su un problema di Abel. Math. Ann., 99, 183-199. Tranter, C.J. 1) (1950) On some dual integral equations occurring in potential problems with axial symmetry. Quart. J. Meek. and A ppl. Math., 3, no 4, 41 1-419. 2) (1951) On some dual integral equations. Quart. J. Math. Oxford 8er., 2, no 5, 60-66 . 3) (1954) A further note on dual integral equations and an application to the diffraction of electromagnetic waves. Quart. J. Meek. and Appl. Math., 7 , no 3, 317-325.
Trebels, W. 1) (1973) Multipliers for ( c, a)-bounded Fourier expansions in Banach spaces and approximation theory. Lect. Note• Math., no 329, V, 103 p. 2) {1975) Some Fourier multiplier criteria and the spherical Bochner-Riesz kernel. Rev. roum. math. pure8 et appl., 20, no 10, 1 173-1 185. Trebels, W. and Westphal, U. 1) (1971) A note on the Landau-Kallman-Rota-Hille inequality. Linear operators and approximations. In Proc. Conf. Oberwolfach, Bir:khauser Veri., 115-119. Tremblay, R. 1) (1974) Une contribution a Ia theorie de docteur. Univ. Laval, Quebec, Canada, 544 p.
Ia
derivee fractionnaire. The•e de
944
BIBLIOGRAPHY 2) ( 1979) Some operational fonn.ulas involving the operators zD, zA and fractional derivatives. SIAM J. Ma.tla. Aaal., 10, no 5, 933-943 - .
Tremblay, B.. and Fugere, B.J. 1 ) ( 1984) Expansions of operators related to zD and the fractional derivative. 16itl., 15, no 6, 1214-1219. Tricomi, F .G. 1 ) (1927) Sull' equazioni integrale di Abel con limiti d'integrazione constanti. Rentl. In•t. Lomba.rtlo, Ser. 2, 60, 598-604. 2 ) (1935 ) Sulla tra.nsf'ormazione e il teorema di reciprocita di Hankel. Atti Rea.le Acca.tl. Naz. Lincei, Rentl. IV, 22, 564-571. 3) ( 1947) On Linear EtJu.tion• of Mizetl Trpe (Russian) . Moecow, Leningrad: Gostehizdat, 192 p. 4) (1954) Lezioni ••lle eq•azioni a tlerivste parziali. Torino: Editrice Gheroni, 484 p. Triebel, H. 1 ) (1980) Interpolation tlaeor,. Anctiona.l •pacu. Differentia./ operator• (Russian) . Moscow: Mir, 664 p. (English ed. in VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, 1977) . Trimeche, K. 1 ) ( 1981 ) Transformation integrale de Weyl et theoreme de Paley-Wiener associ& a un operateur differentiel singulier sur (O, oo). J. matla. p•re• et appl., 60, no 1, 51-98.
Trione, E.S. 1 ) (1980) On the Fourier transforms of retarded Lorentz-invariant functioll8. 7ra.6. mat. In•t. argent. mat., 26, 1-109. 2 ) (1987) On Marsel Riesz's ultra hyperbolic kernel. 16itl., 116, 1-12. 3) ( 1988) On Manel Riesz's ultra hyperbolic .kernel. St•tl. A ppl. Matla., 79, no 3, 185-191. Tseitlin, A.I. 1 ) ( 1984) Applied metlaotl• for •ol•tion of tlae bo•ntlarr va.l•e problem• of hiltling m eclaanic• (Russian). Moscow: Stroiizdat, 334 p. Tiirke, H. and Zeller, K. 1 ) (1981 ) Riesz mean-value theorem extended. In Proc. Srtl Intern. Con/. Geaeralizetl InetJ•alitiu'3 (Oberwolfach, 1981 ) , Basel ets., 491-496.
Uftyand, Ya.S. 1 ) ( 1977) Tlae metlaotl of tl•al etJ.ation• in problem• of matlaematical plar•ic• (Russian) . Leningrad: Naub, Leningrad. Otdel., 220 p. Ugniewski, S. 1 ) ( 1976) Solviag tlae A bel integral etJ•ation br mean• of ortlaogonal polrnomitJl•. Wanaw, 17 p. 2 ) ( 1977) Solving the Abel integral equation by interpolation methods. Za•to•. Mat. Appl. Matla., 16, no 1 , 91-109. Umarkhadzhiev, S.M. 1 ) ( 1981 ) Complete continuity of multipliers in the scale of spaces of Riesz potentials (Russian) . IZtJ. Severo-Kavhz. Na•cla. T•entra Vr••la. SU:oiJ, Ser. E•te•tt�. Na•A:, no 4, 32-35. Upadhyay, M. 1 ) ( 1971 ) q-Fractional differentiation and basic hypergeometric transformations. A nn. polon. matla., 25, no 2, 109-124. Usanetashvili, M.A. 1 ) ( 1982 ) On a problem with an oblique fractional derivative for the Holmgren equation (RU88ian) . Different•ial'nre Uravnenira, 18, no 1 , 144-152. (Transl. in Di/. Et•at. 18 ( 1982) , no 1, 124-130) . Vainberg, B.B.. and Gindikin, S.G. 1 ) (1967) A strengthened Huygens principle for a certain clua of differential operaton with constant coefficients (Russian). 1fo.tlr Modot�. Mat. Ohlacla., 1 6, 151-180. Vakulov, B.G. 1 ) (1986) The operaton of potential type on the sphere in the generalized HOlder spaces (Russi an). Roatov-on-Don, Dep. in VINITI 6.03.86, no 1563-B, 31 p. 2 ) ( 1986) An operator of potential type on a sphere in generalized Holder classes (Russian) . IZt1. Vr••la. Uclaebn. Zavetl. Mat., no 1 1 , 66-69.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
945
Vakulov, B.G. and Samko, S.G. 1) (1987) Equivalent nonns in spaces of functions of fractional smoothness on the sphere of type c >- (sn -1 ) , H>. (Sn -t) (Russian). Ibid., no 12, 68-71 .
Varma, R.S. 1) (1951) On a generalization of Laplace integral. Proc. Nat. A cad. Sci. India, A 20, 209-216. Varma, V.K. 1 ) (1969) Inversion of a class of transfonns with a difference kernel. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 65, no 3, 673-677.
Proc.
Vashchenko-Zakharchenko, M. 1) (1861) On fractional differentiation /Wastchenxo-Zachar tchenxo M.f. Quart. J. Math., Ser. 1 , 4, 237-243. Vasilache, S. 1 ) (1953) Asupra unei ecuatii integrale de tip Abel A cad. R. P. Romtine, 3, no 3-4, 109-113.
cu
doua variable. Comm.
Vasilets, S.I. 1 ) (1989) Solution in closed form of an integral equation of the first kind with logarithmic kernel (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk BSSR, 33, no 9, 777-780. Vasil'ev, l.L. 1) (1981) Uniqueness of the solution of a system of Abel's equations with constant coefficients (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk BSSR, 25, no 2, 105-107. 2) (1981) The operators of potential type with degenerate symbol (Russian). Minsk, Dep. in VINITI 01.07.81, no 3217, 17 p. 3) (1981) On the method of Hermite fonns in the theory of the solvability of the systems of Abel equations (Russian) . Minsk, Dep. in VINITI 1.07.81, no 3218, 15 p. 4) (1982) Systems of integral equations with an Abel kernel on an interval of the real axis (Russian). Ve1tai Akad. Navuk BSSR, Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Navuk, no 2, 47-53. 5) (1982) Operators of potential type with a degenerate symbol (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk BSSR, 26, no 4, 300-302. 6) (1985) The systems of the generalized Abel equations (Russian). In Proc. comm emorative 1eminar on boundary value problem• (Minsk, 1981) , Minsk: Univer sitetskoe, 151-153.
Veber, V.K. 1) (1973) On a differential equation of non-integer order (Russian). In Sb . trudov a1pir. i aoi1kat. Kirgizak. univ., Ser. mat. nauk, Vyp. 10, 7.-14. 2) (1974) A space of fundamental functions in the theory of Liouville differentiation (Russian). Trudy Kirgiz. Goa. Univ., Ser. Mat. Nauk, Vyp. 9, 164-168. 3) (1976) The structure of general solution of the system y( a ) = Ay,O < 01 � 1 (Russian). Ibid., Vyp. 11, 26-32. 4) (1976) Generalized Liouville differentiation, convolution, Fourier transform (Russian) . Ibid., Vyp. 12, 11-25. 5) (1983) Asymptotic behavior of solutions of a linear system of differential equations of fractional order (Russian). In Studiea in integro-differential equation&, Frunze: Ilim, no 16, 119-125. 6) (1983) Passivity of linear systems of differential equations with fractional derivative and quasiasymptotic .behavior of solutions (Russian). Ibid., no 16, 349-356. 7) (1985) On the general theory of linear systems with fractional derivatives (Russian) . Ibid., no 18, 301-305. 8) (1985) Linear equations with fractional derivatives and constant coefficients in spaces of generalized functions (Russian) . Ibid., no 18, 306-312. Veber, V.K. and Urdoletova, A.B. 1) (1974) The space of generalized functions and the operation of the differentiation in the sense of Riemann-Liouville (Russian) . Trudy m olod. uch enyh. Mat., fiz., him., Frunze: Kirgiz. Univ., Vyp. 2, Hi·-21. Vekua, I.N. 1) (1945) The inversion of an integral transformation and some its applications (Russian). Soo b1hch. Akad. Nauk Gruzin. SSR, 6, no 3, 177-183. 2) (1947) On a generalization of the Poisson integral for a half-plane (Russian) . Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 56 , no 3, 229-231 .
946
BIBLIOGRAPHY 3) (I948) New Method• for Solving Elliptic Equation• (Russian). Moscow, Leningrad: Gostekhizdat , 296 p.
Verblunsky, S. 1) (I93I) On the limit of a function at a point. Proc. London Math. Soc., Ser. 2, 32, I63-I99. Verma, R. U. 1) (I969) On fractional integrals of two variables and a generalization of the Laplace transformation. Math. Student, A 37, no I-4, I43-I46. 2 ) (I970) Theorem on fractional integration and generalized Hankel transform. Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math., 14, no I, 117-I22. 3) (I972) Some theorems on fractional integration and a generalized Hankel transform of two variables. Math. Student, A 40, I69-I78. 4) (I972) On symmetrical Fourier kernel , IT. Bol. Acad. cienc., fi•., mat. 11 natur. Venezuela, 32, no 97, I07-116. 5) (1974) Solution of an integral equation by L and L -1 operators. An. •ti. Univ. "Al.I. Cuza", la•i, Sec. Ia, 20, no 2, 38I-387. 6) (I975) A formal solution of an integral equation by L and L -1 operators. Ghana J. Sci., 1 5 , no 2, 225-237. 7) (I977-I978) A formal solution of an integral equation involving the H-function of two variables by L2 and L2 1 operators. Math. Notae, 26 , 39-46. 8) (I978) Integral equations involving the G-function as kernel. An. Univ. Bucure•ti, Ser. mat., 27, I07-110. Vessella, S. I) (1985) Stability results for Abel's equation. J. Integr. E9uat., 9, no 2, I25-I34.
Virchenko, N.A. I) (I984) Some hybrid dual integral equations (Russian). Ukrain. Mat. Z. , 36, no 2, 139-I42. 2 ) (I986) Dual integral equations with hypergeometric functions 2F1 ( a, b; c; -xt), 3F2(v, a l t a2; J.' + v, bt ; -xt) (Russian). DoH. Akad. Nauk Ukrain. SSR, Ser. A , no 2, 3-5. 3) (I989) Dual (triple) integral efJuation• (Russian). Kiev: Izdat. Kiev. Univ., I60 p. Virchenko, N .A. and Gamaleya, R. V. I ) (I988) Some questions of the theory of dual integral equations and their applications (Russian). In Boundar11 value pro6lem• for partial diff. e(juat., Kuibyshev, I28-I33. Virchenko, N.A. and Makarenko, L.G. I ) (I974) On some integral equations with Legendre functions (Russian). In Trud71 nauch. con/. V11chi•l. mat. modern nauch.-tehn. p rogreu (Kanev, I974) , Vyp. 1, 86-91. 2} (I975) Some triple integral equations with Bessel functions (Russian). In Mat. fizika. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, Vyp. I8, 72-76. 3) (1975) Certain dual integral equations (Russian). Ukrain. Mat. Z., 27, no 6, 790-794. Virchenko, N.A. and Ponomarenko, S.P. 1) {I979) Properties of the generalized Mehler-Fock integral transformation and its application to the solution of dual-integral equations (Russian). DoH. Akad. Nauk Ukrain. SSR, Ser. A, no 2, 83-86. Virchenko, N.A. and Romashchenko, V.A. 1) (1982) Some triple integral equations with associated Legendre functions (Russian). V71chi•l. Prikl. Mat., Kiev, no 46, 13-I8. Vladimirov, V .S . I ) (1964) Method• of the theoT'!/ of /unction• of •everal complex variahle• (Russian). Moscow: Nauka., 41 1 p. 2) {1979) Generalized function• in mathematical ph11•ic• (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 320 p. 3) {1988) Generalized functions over the field of p-adic numbers (Russian) . U•pehi Mat. Nauk, 4 3 , Vyp. 5{263), I7-53 {Transl. in Ru••ian Math. Survey•, 1988, no 5, I9-64}. Vladimirov, V.S., Drozhzhinov, Yu .N. and Zav'yalov, B.I. I) (1986) Multidimen•ional Tauberian theorem• for g eneralized function• (Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 304 p.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
947
Volkodavov, V.F. 1) (t9n) Solution of the Dirichlet problem for a certain elliptic equation (Russian) . Volzh. Mat. Sb., Kuibyshev, Vyp. 8, 51-57. Volkodavov, V.F. and Repin, O.A. 1) (1982) A boundary value problem for the Euler Darboux equations with positive parameters (Russian). Diffen!f&bial'f&Je Uravfl.ef&ira, 18, DO 7, 1275-1277. Volterra, V. 1) (1896) Sulla inversion.e degli integrali definiti, I-IV. Atti Rule Accad. delle Sci. Torifl.o, 3 1 , 311-323, 400-08 -4 , 557-567, 693-708. 2) (1916) Theoria delle potenze, dei logarithmi e delle funzion.i di composizione. Atti Accad. dei Lif&cei, Ser. 5, 11, 167-249. 3) (1982) Theof'J ofj.f&ctiof&a.l• afl.d of if&tegral af&d if&tegro-diffe'N!f&tial et•atiof&• (Russi an). Moscow: Nauka, 304 p. (English ed. in Dover Publications, Inc. 1959). Volterra, V. and Peres, J. 1) (1924) Le�o"'• ••r Ia compo.itiof& et le• fof&ctiof&• perm•table•. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 183 p. 2) (1936) Theone gefl.ertJle de. fo,.. ctiof&f&elle•. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1, Ch. 7, 166-181. Voskoboinikov, Yu.E. 1) (1978) The inversion of Abel equation by means of cubic splines (Ru.ssian) . In A bel if&ver•iof& af&d it. gefl.er&lizatiof&•, Novosibirsk: Inst. Teor. i Prikl. Meh. Sibirsk. Otdel Abel. Nauk SSSR, 180-189. 2) (1980) Regularizing algorithm for the inversion of Abel equation (Russian ). Ifl.zhef&.-jiz. Z., 39, no 2, 27G-274. Vu Kim Tuan 1) (1985) Integral transformations of Fourier type in a new class of functions (Russian). Doil. Ahd. Nad BSSR, 29, no 7, 584-587. 2) (1985) Some questions of the theory and applications of the hypergeometric type functions (Russian). Dr. Diu., Minsk: Univ., 1 18 p. 3) (1985) On n-ary integral equations (Russian). Uiraif&. Mat. Z., 37, no 4, 43o-437. 4) (1986) On the theory of generalized integral transfonns in a certain function space (Russian). Dokl. Akad. Na•i SSSR, 286, no 3, 521-524 {Transl. in Soviet Math. Dokl., 1986, 33, no 1, 103-106}. 5) (1986) On the factorization of integral transformations of convolution type in the space Lf (Russian). DoU Ahd. Nad Armra,... SSR, 83, no 1 , 7-10. 6) (1986) On the theory of Volterra integral equations with special functions in the kernels (Russian). Dokl. Ahd. Nad BSSR, 30, no 8, 689-691 .
Vu Kim Tuan, Marichev, 0.1. and Yakubovich, S.B. 1) (1986) Composition structure of integral transformations (Russian). Dokl. Ahd. Nad SSSR, 286, no 4, 786-790 {Transl. in Soviet Math. Dokl., 1986, 33, no 1, 166-170}. Vu Kim Tuan and Yakubovich, S.B. 1) (1985) The Kontorovich-Lebedev integral transfor mation in a new class of functions (Russian). Dokl. Ahd. Nad BSSR, 29, no 1 , 11-14 {'lransl. in A mer. Matl. Soc. Traf&•., 1987, 137, no 2, 61-65}. Wainger, S. 1) (1965). Special trigonometric series in k-dimensions. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 59. Walton, J .R. 1) (1975) A distributional approach to dual integral equations of Titclunai'Sh type. SIAM J. Math. A"'al., 6, no 4, 628-643. 2) (1977) The question of uniqueness for dual integral equations of Titchma.rsh type. Proc. Ror. Soc. Edi,.. b•rgh, A 76, no 4, 267-282. 3) (1979) Systems of generalized Abel integral equations with applications to simultaneous dual relations. SIAM J. Math. Af&d., 10, no 4, 808-822. Wang, F.T. 1) (1944) A convergence criterion. for a Fourier series. Duke Math. J., 1 1 , no 3, 435-439. 2) (1944) On Riesz summability of Fourier series by exponential means. Bull. A mer. Math. Soc., 50, 42o-424.
948
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Watanabe, J. 1 ) ( 1961 ) On some properties of fractional powers of linear operators. Proc. Japan Acatl., 37, no 6, 273-275. Watanabe, S. 1 ) ( 1962) On stable processes with boundary conditions. J. Math. Soc. Japan., 14, no 2, 17G-198. Watanabe, T. 1 ) ( 1977) On distributions measured by the Riemann-Liouville operators associated with homogeneous convex cones. Hiro•hima Math. J., 7, no 2, 643-653. Watanabe, Y. 1 ) { 1931) Notes on the generalized derivative of Riemann-Liouville and its application to Leibnitz's formula, I and IT. Tohoku Math. J., 34, 8-27 and 28-41 .
Weber, H. 1 } ( 1872} Ueber die Besselschen Functionen und ihre Anwendung auf die Theorie der elektrischen Strome. J. fir reine untl angew. Math., 75 , no 1, 75-105. Weinstein, A. 1 } ( 1948} Discontinuous integrals and generalized potential theory. Tran•. A mer. Math. Soc., 63, no 2, 342-354. 2 ) ( 1952 ) Sur le probleme de Cauchy pour !'equation de Poisson et l'equation des ondes. C. R. A catl. •ci. Pari•, 234, 2584-2585. 3) ( 1953) Generalized axially symmetric potential theory. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 59, no 1, 2o-38. 4 ) ( 1954) On the wave equation and the equation of Euler-Poisson. Wave motion and vibration theory. In Proc. Symp. Appl. Math., New York: McGraw-Hill, 5, 137-147. 5 ) ( 1955 ) The generalized radiation problem and the Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation. S•mma Bro.•il Math:, 3 , 125-147. 6) { 1955) On a class of partial differential equations of even order. Ann. mat. pura etl appl., Ser. 4, 39, 245-254. 7) ( 1960) On a singular differential operator. 16itl., 49, 359-365. 8 ) ( 1965 ) Some applications of generalized axially symmetric potential theory to continuum mechanics. In A ppl. theory function• to Continuum mechanic•: Proc. intern. •ymp. (Tbilisi, 1963) , Moscow: Naulca, 2, 44o-453. Weiss, R. 1 ) { 1972 ) Product integration for the generalized Abel equation. Math. Comput., 26, no 117, 177-190. Weiss, R. and Anderssen, R.S. I) ( 1972) A product integration method for a class of singular first kind Volterra equations. N•mer. Math., 18, no 5, 442-456. Weiland , G.V. 1 ) { 1968) Fractional differentiation of functions with lacunary Fourier series. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 1 9, no 11, 135-141. 2 ) ( 1968) On the fractional differentiation of a function of several variables. 7ro.n•. A mer. Math. Soc., 1 32, no 2, 487-500. 3) ( 1975 ) Weighted norm inequalities for fractional integrals. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 5 1 , no 1, 143-146. Westphal, U. 1 ) { 1970) Ein Kalkill. fiir gebrochene Potenzen infinitesimaler Erzeuger von Halbgruppen und Gruppen von Operatoren. Teil I: Halbgruppenerzeuger. Compo•. Math., 22, no 1, 67-103. 2 ) ( 1970) Ein Ka.lkiil fiir gebrochene Potenzen infinitesimaler Erzeuger von Halbgruppen und Gruppen von Operatoren. Teil IT: Gruppenerzeuger. 16itl., 104-136. 3) ( 1974) An approach to fractional powers of operators via fractional differences. Proc. London Math. Soc., 29, no 3, 557-576. 4 ) ( 1974) Gebrochene Potenzen abgeschlossener Operatoren, definiert mit Hilfe gebrochener Differenzen. Int. •er. N•mer. Math. Ba•el-St•ttgart, 25, 23-27. Weyl, H. 1 ) { 1917) Bemerkungen zum Begriff des Differentialquotienten gebrochener Ordnung. Vierteljal&re88chrift tier Ntd•rfor•chentlen Ge•ell•chaft in Zirich, 62, no 1-2, 296-302. Wheeden, R.L. 1 ) { 1967) Hypersingular integrals and summability of Fourier integrals and series. In Proc. Symp. Pure Math. A mer. Math. Soc., 10: Singular Integral• (Chicago, 1966) . Ed. A .P.Calderon, Providence, R.I., 336-369.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
949
2) (1968) On bypersingular integrals and Lebesgue spaces of differentiable functions. Tran•. Amer. Math. Soc., 13,, no 3, 421-435. 3) (1969) On bypenUngular integrals and Lebesgue spaces of differentiable functions, II. 16itl., 1 39, no 1, 37-53. 4) (1969) On hypersinguJar integrals and certain spaces of locally differentiable functions. 16itl., 1,6, no 2, 211-230. 5) (1972) A note on a generalized hypersingu)ar integral. St•tl. Math., " ' no 1, 17-26. Whittaker, E.T. 1) (1917-1918) On the numerical solution of integral equations. Proc. RoJ. Soc. Lontlon, Ser. A, 9,, 367-383. Whittaker, E.T. and Watson, G.N. 1) (1965) A Cnr•e in Motlern A nalJ•i•, Vol. 2: 77-an•centlental F•nc#on• (Russian). Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 515 p. (Engl. fourth ed. in Cambridge Univ. Press, 1927). Wick, J. 1) (1968) Uber eine Integralgleichung vom Abelschen Typ. Z. angew. Mat'!&. •ntl Mech., •s , no 8, 39-41 . Widder, D.V. 1) (1938) The Stieltjes transform. Tran•. Amer. Math. Soc., •a, no 1, 7--60. 2) (1946) The Laplace 77-an•form. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 406 p. 3) (1963) The inversion of a convolution transform whose kernel is a Laguerre polynomial. A mer. Math. Month., 70, no 3, 291-293. 4) (1963) Two convolution transforms which are inverted by convolutions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 1•, no 5, 812--817.
Widom, H. 1) (1960) Singular integral equations in L, . Tran•. Amer. Mat!&. Soc., 97, no 1 , 131-160. Wiener, K. 1) (1983) Uber LOsungen einer in der Theorie der Polarographie auftretenden Difl'erentialgleich1mg von nichtganzzahliger Ordnung. Wiu. Z. Uni'fl. Halle Math. Na.t•r. Wiu. R., 32 , no 1, 41-46. 2) (1983) Uber des asymptotische Verhalten der Los1mgen einer Difl'erentialgleichung nichtganzzahliger Ordnung aus der Polarographie. 16itl., 32, no 5, 75--86. 3) (1988) L0s1mgen in homogenen Difl'erentialgleich1mgen mit Ableitungen von nichtganz zabliger Ordnung (ll). 16itl., 37, no 1 , 52-55. Williams, W.E. 1) (1963) A class of integral equations. Proc. Cambritlge Phil. Soc., 59, no 3, 589-597. Wilmes, G. 1) (1979) Some inequalities for Riesz potentials of trigonometric polynomials of several variables. In Proc. SJmpo•. P.re Ma.th. Ha.rmon. A na.l. E•clitlea.n Spa.cu, A mer. Ma.th. Soc. (Williamstown, 1978), Providence, R.I. 175-182. 2) (1979) On Riesz-type inequalities and K-f1mctionals related to Riesz potentials in R" . Numer. F•nct. Ana.l. a.ntl Optim., 1, no 1, 57-77. Wimp, J. 1) (1964) A class of integral transforms. Proc. Etlinburgh Math. Soc., Ser. 2, 14, no 1, 33-40. 2) (1965) Two integral transform pairs involving bypergeometric functions. Proc. Gla.•gow Math. Auoc., 7, no 1, 42-44. Wolfersdorf, L.von 1) (1965) Uber eine Beziehung zwischen lntegralen nichtganzer Ordn1mg. Math. Z., 90, no 1, 24-28. 2) (1965) Abelsche Integralgleichung und Randwertprobleme · fiir die verallgemeinerte 'I'ricomi-Gleichung. Math. Na.chr., 27, no 3-4, 161-178. 3) (1969) Zur LOsung der verallgemeinerten Abelschen Integralgleichung mit konstanten Koeffizienten. Z. a.ngew. Ma.th. •ntl Mech., 49, no 12, 759-761. 4) (1970) Zur Theorie der Spiele iiber dem Einheitsquadrat mit Auszahlungsfunktionen von der Form eines Schmetterlings. Wiu. Z. Uni'fl. Ro•tock, Math.-Nat•rwiu. Reihe, 19, no 6/7, 425-433.
950
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Wong, R. 1} (1978} Asymptotic expansions of fractional integrals involving logarithms. SIAM J. Math. A n41., 9, no 5, 835-842. 2} (1979} Explicit eiTOr tenns for asymptotic expansions of Mellin convolutions. J. Math. A nal. antl Appl., 72, no 2, 740-756. Wood, D.H. 1} (1975) Fractional integration of fundamental solutions. In Proc. Intern. Conf. Frt&ctional Calc•l•• antl it. Appl. (New Haven, 1974}, ed. B . Ross , Lect. Note• Math., "57, 317-322. Wyss, W. 1} (1986) The fractional diffusion equation. J. M4th. Ph,•• , 27, no 11, 2782-2785. Xie Ting-fan 1) (1963} The best approximation of periodic differentiable functions by trigonometric polynomials. Clinue Math., " ' no 2, 179-187. Yakubovich, S.B. 1) (1985} Remark on inversion formu1a for Wimp integral transfonn with respect to index (Ruuian). Differenuial'nJe UrtJ'fmeniJa, 21, no 6, 1097-1098.
Yakubovich, S.B., Vu Kim Tuan, Marichev, 0.1. and Kalla, S.L. 1} (1987) A class of index integral transfonns. Re11. Tee. Fac. Ingr. Uni11. Ztdia, Maracaibo, 10, no 1, 105-118. Yaroslavtseva, V.Ya. 1) {1976) A certain class of transformation operators and their application to differential equations (Russian). Dold. Ahtl. Nad SSSR, 227, no 4, 816-819. Yasakov, A.I. 1} (1969) On the operators of potential type (Russian) . In Primenen. metotlo11 11Jchi•l. mat. i 11Jchi•l. tekhn. tliJa re•heniJa na•ch.-i..letl. i narotl.-hoz,ai.t. Z4tlach, Voronezh: Voronezh. Univ., Vyp. 1, 6-9. Yogachandran, C. 1} (1987} On ordinaey limitability factors for Cesaro means. J. Nat. Sci. Co•nc. Sri Lanh, 1 5 , no 1, 71-81. Yongsheng Hang 1} {1988} llieaz potential operators on certain Hardy-type spaces n&•9•• (nn ). A pproz. Theor, antl A ppl., " ' no 1, 19-35.
Yoshikawa, A. 1) (1971) Fractional powers of operators, interpolation theory and imbedding theorems. J. Fac. Sci. Uni11. Tok,o, Sec. 1A, 18, no 2, 336-362. Yoshinaga, K. 1} (1964) On Liouville's differentiation. B•ll. KJ••h• In•t. Techno/. Math. Nat•r. •ci., no 11, 1-17. 2) (1971} Fractional powers of an infinitesimal generator in the theory of semigroup distribution. 16id., 18, 1-15. Yosida, K. 1) (1960} Fractional powers of infinitesimal generators and the analyticity of the semigroups generated by them. Proc. Japan Acatl., 36, no 3, 86-89. 2) (1967} F•nctional anaiJ•i• (Russian) . Moscow: Mir, 624 p. (English ed. in Springer-Verlag, 1965). Young, E.C. 1} (1969} On a generalized Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation. J. Math. antl Mech., 18, no 12, 1167-1175. Zabreiko, P.P. 1} {1967) The spectral radius of Volterra integral operators (Russian). Litov•k. Mat. 56., 'T, no 2, 281-287. ZAglneecu, M. 1) (1982} Some applications of fractional integration and differentiation in quantum mechanics and field theory. Romania: Univ. din Timisoara, Preprint, U. T. F. T., 5/82, 30 p. 2) (1982) Continuously iterated SchrOdinger equation and the lliemann-Liouville and ruesz operators. 16id., 7/82, 7 p.
ZanelU, V. 1} (1981} I polinom.i di Stieltjes approuimanit in variazione di ordine frazionario. Atti Semin. Mat., Fi•. Uni11. Modena, 30, no 1 , 151-175. 2) (1981} F\mzioni momento convergenti "dal basso" in variazione di ordine non intero. 16 itl., no 2, 355-369.
951
BIBLIOGRAPHY 3) (1988) Derivate di ordine frazionario dei polinomi di Jacobi. 16itl., 36,
no
1, 57-74.
Zeilon, N. 1) (1924) Sur quelques points de Ia theorie de !'equation integrale d'Abel. A rii11 for Mat., A •tr. ocla FJ•ii, 18, no 5, 1-19. Zheludev, V.A. 1) (1974) The well-posedness of a certain c1asa of convolution equations (Ruuian). Z. V,clai•l. Mat. i Mat. Fiz., 14:, no 3, 61o-630. 2) (1982) Derivatives of fractional order and the numerical solution of a c1asa of convolution equations (Ruuian). Differeauial'aJe UraneaiJa, 1 8, no 11, 1950-1960.
Zhemukhov, Kh.Kh. 1) (1986) The Darboux problem for a second-order degenerate loaded integro-difl'erential equation (Ruaian). Ibitl., 22, no 12, 2174-2176. Zhuk, V.V. 1) (1986) Constructive characteristics of certain classes of functions (Ruuian). In Mat/a. metlaotl• ia tlae aaalJ•i• of coatrollable proceue•. VoproiJ Mel&. Prot.eu. Upra11l. Leningrad: Leningrad. Univ ., no 8, 88-94.
Zhong Zhu Zo 1) (1988) Some new results of the class La (k, p) . Natur. Sci. J. Huailaue Teacla. Coli., T, no 2, 1-5.
Zygmund, A. 1) (1934) Some points in the theory of trigonometric and power series. 77-aal. A mer. Mat/a. Soc., 36, no 2, 586-617. 2) (1945) Smooth functions. Duie Mat/a. J., 12, no 1, 47-76. 3) (1945) A theorem on fractional derivatives. Ibitl., no 3 , 455-464. 4) (1956) On a theorem of Marcinkiewicz concerning interpolation of operations. J. mat/a. pure• et appl., 35, no 3, 223-248. 5) (1965) Trig oaometric Serie•. Moecow: Mir, Vol 1, 616 p. (English ed. in Cambridge Univ. Press, 1968). 6) (1965) Trigoaometric Serie•. Moscow: Mir, Vol. 2, 538 p. (English. ed. in Cambridge Univ. Press , 1968).
AUTHOR INDEX
A
Abdullaev, S.K. 590 Abel, M.H. xxi, xxiii, xxiv, xxv, 82 Adamchik, V.S. xxii, 174 Adams, D.R. 589 Adams, R. 583 Agarwal, R.P. 87, 317, 442, 443 Aggarwala, B .D. 793 Ahern, P. 451 Ahiezer, N .l. 302, 685, 693, 774, 779 Ahmad, M .I. 794 Ahner, J .F . 780 Ahuja, G. 172 Ahuja, O .P. 454 Akopyan, S.A. 440, 772 Al-Abedeen, A.Z. 857 Al-Amiri, H.S. 454 Al-Bass am, M .A. xxii, 316, 454, 857, 868, 869 Alekseevskii, V .P. 858 Aleroev, T .S. 857, 867 Alexitz, G. 445 Aliniov, S.A. 583 Alonso, J . 868 Al-Salam, W.A. 317, 442, 443 Alshamani, J .G. 865 Amvrosova, 0 .1. 867 Andersen, K.F. 166, 168, 590 Anderson, T .P. 85 Anderssen, R.S. 85 Andreev, A.A. 798
Ang, D.D. 659 Arestov, V.V. 313 Aronszajn, N. 432, 583 Arora, A.K. 317 Arora, H.L. 857, 865 Arutyunyan, M.H. 689 Askey, R. 314 Asral, B. 862 Atiyah, M.F. 584 Atkinson, F .V. 685 Atkinson, K.E. 85 B
Babenko, K.l. 821 Babenko V .F. 444 Babenko, Yu.l. xxii Babich, V .M. 798 Babloyan, A.A. 793 Badalyan, A.A. 89 Bagby R.J. 584, 589, 594, 601 Bagley, R.L. xvii, xxii Bakaev, N.Yu. 161 Baker, B .B 583 Bakievich, M.l. 774 Balakrishnan, A.V. 120, 161 Balasubramanian R. 85 Banerji, P.K. 793 Bang, T. 432, 433 Bari, N .K. 249, 443 Barrett, J .H. 857 Bavinck, H . 445 Beatroux, F . 603
954
AUTHOR INDEX
Beekmann, W. 315 Belinskii, E.S. 436 Belonosov, S.M. 864 Beltrami, E. 774, 856 Bel ward, J .A. 302 Belyi, V .1. 436, 449 Benedek, A. 580, 588 Berens, H . 161 , 170, 865 Berger, N . 305, 318, 319, 857 Bernstein, I.N. 584 Besov, O .V. 580, 589, 591 Bessonov, Yu.L. 580 Betilgiriev, M .A. 320 Bharatiya, P.L. 773 Bhatt, S.M. 315 Bhise, V .M . 170, 438, 782 Bhonsle, B .R. 776 Biacino, L. 432, 587, 870 Bitsadze, A.V. 820, 843, 844, 856, 857 Bleistein, N. 294, 305 Blum, E.K. 862 Blumenthal, L.M. 435 Bocher, M. 82 Bochner, S. 581 Bogatyrev, S .V. 867 Boman, J . 448 Bora, S.L. 170 Borisov, V .N. 861 Borodachev, N .M. 794 Bosanquet, L.S. xxxii, 83, 84, 160, 163, 164, 277, 312, 313, 315, 434 Botashev, A.l. 866 Bouwkamp, C.J . 790 Box, M .A. 783 Braaksma, B.L.J . 438, 777 Bragg, L.R. 868 Brakhage, H. 86 Bredimas, A. 162, 172, 371 , 434, 591 Brenke, W.C. xxii Bresters, D.W. 584, 863 Brodskii, A.L. 587 Brunner, H. 85 Brychkov, Yu.A. 15, 18, 20, 22, 27, 172, 174, 198, 201, 206, 282, 284, 325, 355, 372, 551 , 584, 586, 711 , 733, 739, 740, 742, 743, 755, 773, 774, 781
Bugrov, Ya.S. 371, 434 Bukhgeim, A.L. 90 Burbea, J. 603 Bureau, F .J. 863 Burenkov, V .1. 371 , 434 Burkill, J .C. 312 Burlak, J. 773, 774 Busbridge, I,W. 774 Buschman, R.G. xxii, 23, 431 , 695, 772, 776, 777, 784, 786, 787, 793 Butzer, P.L. xix, xxxii, 161 , 303, 371 , 433, 434, 444, 446-448 Bykov, Ya.V. xxii, 866 Bzhikhatlov, H.G. 689, 862 c
Calderon, A.P. 583 Campos, L.M.B.C. 452, 866, 868 Carbery, A. 163 Carleman, T. 449, 685, 687 Cartwright, D .1. 90 Cayley, A. 83 Center, R. W. xxv Chakrabarty, M. 789 Chan, C.K. 85 Chandrasekharan, K. 277 Chanillo, S. 584, 588, 590, 601 , 862 Chen Yung-ho 593 Chen, Y.W. 82, 84, 301 , 302 Cheng, H. 864 Cheng Min-teh 593 Cherskii, Yu.l. 695 Chiang, D. 689 Cho Nak Eun 454 Choudhary, B . 163 Chrysovergis, A. 432 Chumakov, F.V. , 688, 689 Chuvenkov, A.F. 168, 591 Civin, P. xxxi, 433 Clements, D.L., 864 Cohn, W.S. 451 Colzani, L. 602 Conlan, J ., 171 Cooke, J .C. 793 Copson, E.T. 583, 772, 774, 775, 779, 860, 864 Cossar, J . xxxii, 163, 315 Cotlar, M., 589
AUTHOR INDEX D
Darboux, G. 856 Davis, H.T. xix, xx, xxx, 87, 302, 434, 867 Davtyan, A.A. 595, 596 Delerue, P. 580 Deng Dong-gao 593 Di Giorgio, M. 587 Diaz, J .B. 453, 862 Didenko, A.V. xxii, 857, 868 Dimovski, I.H. xxii, 302, 436, 454, 871 Din Khoang An 777 Dinghas, A. 87 Ditkin, V .A. 24, 28 Dixit, L.A. 776 Doetsch, G. 162 Doktorskii, R.Ya. 85 Domingues, A.G. 600 Drianov, D.P. 447 Drozhzhinov, Yu.N. 602, 865 Duduchava, R. V. 302 Dunford, M. 642 Dveirin, M .Z. 449 Dwivedi, A.P., 794 Dyckhoff, H. 434, 444, 447, 448 Dyn'kin, E.M . 590 Dzhabirov, D.K. 860 Dzherbashyan, A.M. 453 Dzherbashyan, M.M. xix , xxvii, 22, 24, 83, 84, 87, 88, 89, 303, 345, 432, 435, 453, 661 , 686, 709, 713, 772, 841, 857, 867 Dzyadyk, V .K . 432, 444 .
E
Edels, H . 85 Efimov, A.V. 433, 444 Eggermont, P.P.B. 85 Elliott, J . 602 Elrod, H .G., Jr. 773 Emgusheva, G.P. 593, 596, 597 Erdelyi, A. xxxi , xxxii, 14, 18, 22, 88, 91, 160, 162, 163, 165, 172, 180, 193, 196, 199, 201 , 302, 319, 431 , 432, 436, 437, 441 , 455, 539, 551 , 661 , 677, 724, 733, 735, 751 , 772, 774-777, 783, 851, 856, 858, 859, 860
955
Eskin, G.l. 582, 599 Esmaganbetov, M .G. 444, 447, 568 Estrada, R., 162 Euler, L. 856 Evsin, V .1. 862 Exton, H. 443 F
Faber, V. 86 Fabian, W. 89, 448, 449 Far aut, J . 603 Fattorini, H.O. 161 Favard, J . 444 Fedoryuk, M.V. 285, 584 Fedosov1 V .P. xxii, 584, 869 Feller, W. 216, 303 Fenyo, S. xix Ferrar, W .L. 434 Fettis, H.E. 85 Fihtengol'tz, G.M. 485 Fisher, B. xxii Fisher, M .J . 83, 582, 599 Flett, T.M. xxxii, 84, 91, 160, 315, 450, 452, 583, 591 Fofana, I. 590 Foht, A.S., 587 Fomin, S.V. 3, 24, 328 Fourier, J. xxiii, 32 Fox, Ch. xxxii, 437, 442, 772, 773, 781, 783, 794 Fremberg, M.E. 583 Frie, W. 85 Friedlander, F .G. 860 Frostman, 0. 581 Fugere, B .J . 871 Fujiwara, M. 857 Fukui, S. 454 G
Gabidzashvili, M.A. 581 , 590 Gaer, M.C. 317, 453 Gahov, F.D. 199, 201 , 202, 605, 617, 622, 651, 684, 685, 695, 848 Gaimnazarov, G. 447 Gamaleya, R.V. 793 Ganeev, R.M. 685, 688 Garabedian, H.L. 315 Garding, L. 581 , 603
956
AUTHOR INDEX
Garnett, J .B. 92 Gasper, G. 163, 164, 783 Gatto, A.E. 590 Gearhart, L. 168 Geisberg, S ,P. 167, 433 Gel'fand, I.M. 162, 487, 548, 556, 576, 583, 584, 867 Gel'fand, S.l. 584 Gel'fond, A.O. 436 Gel'man, I.V. 167 Genebashvili, I.Z. 590 Gerlach, W. 85, 659 Gilbert, R.P. 857, 860 Gindikin, S .O. xxiv, 602, 603 Ginzburg, A .S. 600 Glaeske, H.-J. xxii, 440, 773, 792 Gliner, E.B. 798 Godunova, E .K. 314 Gohberg, I.Ts. 199, 302, 630, 646, 656, 675, 684, 685 Gomes, M .l. xxii Gopala Rao, V.R. 584, 601 Gordeev, A.M. 746, 857 Gordon, A.N. 774, 775 Gorenflo, R. xvii, xviii, xxii, 85, 86, 87, 659, 691 Gorlich, E. 434, 444, 447, 448 Goyal, S.P. 439, 777 Graev, M .I . 576, 584 Greatheed , S .S . xxv Grinchenko, V.T. 793 Grin'ko, A.P. 305, 440, 865 Grunwald, A.K. xxiv, xxv, xxx , 304, 371, 434, 435, 479 Grzaslewicz, R. 866 Gupta, H.L., 786 Gupta, K .C. 171, 782 Gupta, S .B . 786 Gupta Sulaxana K. 315 Guseinov, A.l. 251, 303, 304 Gutierrez, C.E. 590 Gwilliam, A.E. 451 H
Habibullah, G .M . 777, 784, 785 Hadamard, J . xxvii, 112, 345, 435 Hadid, S.B. 865, 866 Hai, D.D. 659, 691
Hall, M.S. 862 Handelsman, R.A. 288, 305, 318320, 857 Harboure, E. 590 Hardy, G.H. xxvii, xxviii, xxix, 84, 86, 88, 91 , 160, 161, 277, 304, 314, 315, 432, 433, 435, 450, 451 Hasanov, A. 861 Hatcher, J.B. 689 Havin, V.P. 582 Hearne, K. 85 Hedberg, 1.1. 581 Heinig, H.P. 166, 590 Heins, A.E. 860 Helgason, S. 581 , 591 Henrici, P. 774, 860 Herson, D,L. 161 Herz , C.S. 591 Hess, A. 792 Heywood, P. 161 , 685, 789 Higgins, T.P. 172, 302, 439, 772, 773, 775-777, 869 Hilbert, R.P. 805 Hille, E. 83, 85, 120, 161, 301, 315, 445 Hirsch, F. 161 Hirshman, 1.1. 452, 695, 772, 792 Holmgren, Hj . xxiv, xxv, xxvi, 82, 83, 316, 431 , 435, 580, 851 , 857 Botta, G.C. 315 Horvath, J. 582, 594 Hovel, H.W. 161 Hromov, A.P. 86 Huber, A. 862 Hughes, R.J . 161, 313 Humbert, P. 87 Hvedelidze, B .V. 302 I
Ibragimov, 1.1. 315 Il'in, V .P. 580, 589 lmanaliev, M .1. 865 Isaacs, G.L. 83, 312 Isamukhamedov, S.S. 861 Ivanov, L.A. 600 lvashkina, G.A. 861 Izumi, S. 444
AUTHOR INDEX J
Jackson, F.H. 442 Jain, N .C. 580 Jevtic, M. 451 , 604 Joachimsthal, F. xxv Johnson, R. xxii, 583 Jones, B.F., Jr. 584 Jones, D.S. 685 Joshi, B.K. 786 Joshi, C.M. 88 Joshi, J . M . C . 437 J uberg, R.K. 303 K
Kabanov, S.N. 86 Kae, M . 602 Kalia, R.M. 774 Kalisch, G .K. 162 Kalla, S.L. xxii, xxxii, 170, 439, 778, 782, 786, 792, 868, 869 Kant, S. 786 Kanwal, R.P. 162 Kapilevich, M.B. 746, 747, 798, 860 Karapetyants, N .K. 84, 91, 92, 169, 308, 311, 432, 685 Karasev, I.M. 858, 862 Kashin, B.S. 92, 310 Kashyap, N .K. 778 Kato, T. 161 , · 685 Katsaras, A. 443 Kaul, C.L. (see also Koul, C.L.) 317, 318, 584, 782. 786 Kelland, P. xxv Kerman, R. 862 Kesarwani, R.N. (Narain Roop) 793 Khan, A.B. 443 Khan, M .A. 443 Khandekar, P.R. 786 Kilbas, A.A. xvii, xxii , 84, 303, 305, 319, 434, 435, 440, 448, 589, 603, 859 Kim Hong Oh 451 Kim Yong Chan 451 King, L.V . 774 Kipriyanov, I.A. xxxii, 580, 585, 600 Kiryakova, V.S. 302, 439, 454, 580, 778, 871
Kishore, N. 315 Klyuchantsev, M.l. 441 Kober, H. xxxi i, 83, 160, 162, 302, 303, 431 , 436, 453, 772 Kochubei, A.M. 597, 861 Kochura, A .I. 857, 868 Koeller, R.C. xxii Kofanov, V.A. 315 Kogan, H.M. 690 Koh, E.L. 171 Koizumi, S. 452 Kokilashvili, V.M. 308, 581, 590, 591 Kolmogorov, A.N. 3, 24, 328 Komatsu, H. 161 Komatu, Y. 454 Komori, Y. 588 Korobeinik, Yu.F. 436 Kosarev, E.L. 85 Koschmieder, L. 584 Koshljakov, N .S. 796 Kostitzin, V. 86 Kostometov, G.P. 312 Koul, C.L. (see also Kaul, C.L.) 318, 584, 782, 786 Kovetz, Y. 85 Kolbig K.S. xxii Kralik, D. 444, 445 Krantz, S.G. 590 Krasnosel'skii, M.A. 120, 161 , 168, 169, 655 Krasnov, V.A. 432, 587 Krbec, M. 591 Krein, M.G. 685 Krein, S.G. 5, 630 Krepkogorskii, V .L. 466 Krishna, S. 585 Krivenkov, Yu.P. 860 Krug, A. 435 Krupnik, N .Ya. 199, 302, 630, 656, 675, 684, 685 Kudryavtsev, L.D. 444 Kufner, A. 590 Kumbhat, R.K. 438, 439, 776, 786 Kumykova, S.K. 861 Kurokawa, T. 592, 595 Kuttner, B. 302, 315 Kuvshinnikova, I.L. 597
957
301 ,
589,
317,
167,
646,
782,
958
AUTHOR INDEX
L
Lacroix, S.F.171 Lamb, W. Lambe, C.G. 162, 171 Landau, E. 313 Landkof, O.M.ES.. 161 581 , 593 Lanford, Laplace, P.H.S . 415,xiii 435 Laurent, Lavoie, J .L.N.A.172,429,452436 Lebedev, Lebedev, N.N. 23, 24, 7'74, 778, 793, 794 Lee SangG.Keun 454 Leibniz, W . xxiii Leont'eJ.v, A.581F ., 600426, 436 Leray, Leskovskii, I.P. 862 Letnikov, A.V. xxi, xxiv, xxv, xxvi, 83, 160, 174, 302, 304, 371 , 433, 435, 452, 479 Levin, V.B.I . M314 Levitan, . 431 Levy, M. E . 85 288, 318 Lew, JH..S. 861 Lewy, Lieb, B.H.N .E588. 454 Linchuk, Linfoot, E.H. 315 Linker, A. l . 312, 692 Lions, J .L. J. 161,xxi,583xxiii, xxiv, xxv, Liouville, xxvi, xxviii,J.E82,. 83 84, 91, 160, Littlewood, 304, 433, 435, 450, 451 Liu, D. 443 597 Liu Gui-Zhong Liverman, T.P. Gxxx. i432 Lizorkin, P. l . i, 147, 162, 171, 433, 467, 475, 477, 489, 580, 58� 583, 586, 588, 591 , 594, 598, 601 Loo, -T. xxii, 315 xxx, xxxi, xxxii, 23, Love,C.E.R. XXIU
.xix,
xxix ,
83, 89, 92, 301, 302, 432, 593, 772, 777, 783 689, 774, 794 431, 774, 775, 780, 794
Lowengrub, Lowndes, J .M.S.
Lu, P. Ch. 85 Lubich, 85, 371 , 448 Luke, Y. L . 17, 22 Lundgren,J. T.xxiv689 Liitzen, M
Macias, R.A.AG.. 588, 590 Mackie, 788, 791 Madhavi Dinge 782 Magaril-Il' y aev, G. G . 580, 586 Magnus, W. 14, 18, 22, 88, 91, 160, 172, 180, 193, 196, 199, 201, 441 , 455, 539, 551 , 861 Mainra, V.PL.G. . 782 775, 793, 794 Makarenko, Malakhovskaya, R.691 M . 867 Malamud, M.M. Malinovski, H.V.A.85 439 Malovichko, Malozemov, V.GM. . 442443 Mamedov, R. Manandhar, R.S.P. 857783 Mandelbrojt, Manocha, H.M.M. L . 88,689318 Manukyan, Marchaud, A. 109, 1 10, 1 1 1 , 1 16, 168, 303, 469, 480, 580 Marichev, xxii, 27, 28, 172, 174, 190, 191 , 198, 201 , 206, 282, 284, 0.1.
301 , 700, 739, 781 ,
xxix ,
325, 355, 372, 437, 551, 584, 701 , 707, 711, 725, 726, 733, 740, 742, 743, 755, 772-774, 784, 785, 792, 856, 857 .xix
Marke, P.B.W.170 Martie, Martin-Reyes,V.M. F.J . 453 167 Martirosyan, Mathai A.B.L. M . 781 Mathur, 170 Mathur, S. L . 170, 171, 585 Matsnev, L.B.N. 86445 Matsuyama, Maz' ya, V.A.GC. . 582xix, xxii, xxxii, 157, McBride, 162, 172, 301 , 431, 439, 777, 871 McClure, P. 288,783305, 319 McKellar,J.B.H.J.
AUTHOR INDEX
McMullen, J .R. 90 Meda, S. 581 Medvedev, N. V, 85 Mengziyaev, B. 861 Mhitaryan, S.M. 685 Mihailov, L.G. 87 Mihlin, S.G. 518, 521 , 570, 584, 589, 661 , 724, 733, 735, 798 Mikolas, M. xx, xxii, xxxii, 162, 315, 432-434, 452, 581 Miller, J .B. 160 Minakshisundaram, S. 277, 315 Minerbo, G .M. 85 Miserendino, D. 587, 870 Misra, A.P. 9 1 Mittal, P.K. 171 Mizuta, Y. 588, 592 Modi, G .C. 585 Mohapatra, R.M. 315 Montel, P. xxviii, 315, 433, 580, 586 Moppert, K.F . 434 Most, R. 433 Mourya, D.P. 584 Muckenhoupt, B. xxii, 199, 202, 3 1 1 , 495, 581 , 588, 590, 596, 605, 617, 622, 684, 685 Muhtarov, B .S. 251 , 303, 304 Mulla, F. 583 Miiller, C. 776 Murdaev, H.M. 303, 304, 433 Murray, M.A. 588 Muskhelishvili, N .1. 5, 6, 302 N
N agnibida, N .1. 436 Nagy, B.S. xxxi, 432, 433, 444 Nahushev, A.M. 442, 857, 861 , 862 , 866, 867 Nair, V .C. 787 Narain Roop (see Kesarwani Roop N arain) 23, 772, 781 Nasibov, F.G. 315 N asim, C. 782, 793 Natanson, I.P. 798 Nauryzbaev, K .Zh. 444 Nekrasov, P.A. 302 , 415, 435, 858 Nersesyan, A.B. 83, 88, 89, 303, 440, 453, 841 , 857
959
Nessel, R.J. xix, 444 Nesterov, S.V. 868 Neugebauer, C.J . 371 Neunzert, H. 689 Nevostruev, L.M. 861 Nickel, K. 86 Nieva del Pino, M .E. 438 Nikolaev, V.P. 581 Nikol 'skaya, N .S. 580, 586 Nikol'skii, S.M. xxxii , 24, 368, 433, _ 444, 477, 528, 580, 583, 586, 589, 593, 595, 596, 597, 600, 601 , 685 Nishimoto, K. xvii, xxii, xxxii, 172, 435, 454, 866, 869 Noble, B. 774 Nogin, V.A. xxii, 552, 582-584 Norrie, D.H. 85 Nozaki, Y. 583 Nunokawa, M. 454 0
Oberhettinger, F. 14, 18, 22, 88, 9 1 , 160, 172, 180, 193, 196, 199, 201 , 441 , 455, 661 , 677, 724, 733, 735, 751 , 772, 783, 851 , 861 Obradovic, M. 454 Ogievetskii, 1.1. xxxii , 433, 444 Okikiolu, G .O. xix, 169, 303, 307, 581, 783 Oldham, K.B. xix, xxii, 172 Olevskii, M.M. 862 Olmstead, W.E. 320 Olver, F. 285 O 'Neil, R.O. xxxii, 167, 168, 591 Onneweer, C.W. 443 Oramov, Zh. 861 Orazov, I. 861, 862 Ortner, M. 582, 594 Orton, M. 689 Orudzhaev, G .N. 442 O 'Shaughnessy, L. 857 Osilenker, B .P. 590 Osipov, A.V. 85 Osler, T.J. xxxi i, 89, 90, 304, 305 , 316, 317, 432, 452, 453 Ovesyan, K.R. 453 Owa, S. xxii , xxxii, 435, 436, 454, 866
960
AUTHOR INDEX
p
Pacchiarotti, N . 88 Padmanabhan, K.S. 454 Pahareva, N .A. 859 Palamodov, V .P. 584 Paley, R.E.A.C. 315 Panzone, R. 580, 588, 589 Parashar, B .P. 439, 778 Pathak, R.S. 783, 794 Pavlov, P.M . 602 Peacock, G. xxxii Peetre, J . 92, 161 Pekarskii, A.A. 451 Pennell, W.O. 90 Penzel, F. 303, 690 Peres, J . 686, 693 Peschanskii, A.l. 449, 689 Pestana, D.D. xxii Peters, A .S. 688, 689, 774, 775 Petunin, Yu.l. 5 Phillips, R.S. 83, 84, 86, 120, 161 Pichorides, S .K. 200 Pilidi, V.S. 580 Pinkevich, V.T. 444 Pinney, E. 789 Pitcher, E. 857 Plessis, N.du 581 , 588, 589 Poisson, S.D . 856, 85 7 Pokalo, A.K. 444 Polking, J .C. 317 Pollard, H . 789 Polozhii, G .N. 82, 859 P6lya, G. 160, 308 Ponce, G. 597 Ponomarenko, S.P. 794 Ponomanenko, V .G . 447, 775, 794 Popov, G .Ya. 762 Popoviciu, T. 168 Post, E.L. 316, 375, 434, 447, 857 Prabhakar, T.R. 302, 773, 776, 786, 789, 791 Preobrazhenskii, N.G. xxii, 584 Privalov, 1.1 302 Prudnikov, A .P. 15, 18, 20, 22, 24, 27, 28, 172, 174, 198, 201, 206, 282, 284, 325, 355, 372, 551, 584, 711, 733, 739, 740, 742, 743, 755, 773, 781
Pryde, A.J . 595 Pustyl'nik, E.I. 161 , 655 Q
Quinn, D.W. 862 R
Rabinovich, V.S. 603 Rabinovich, Yu.L. 434, 868 Rabotnov, Yu.M. xxii Radzhabov, E.L. 582 Radzhabov, N. 860 Rafal'son, S.Z . 442 Raina, R.K. 584, 580, 782, 786 Rakesh, S.L. 171 Reddy, G.L. 454 Reimann, H.M. 92 Ren, F. 454 Repin, O.A. 862 Ricci, F. 604 Richberg, R. 776 Rieder, P. 86 Riekstyn'sh, E.Ya. 288, 305, 318, 319, 448 Riemann, B . xxiv, xxv, xxvi, 82, 83, 88, 92, 856 Riesz, M. xxvii, xxx , 84, 277, 301 , 302, 314, 481, 483, 498, 502, 58 1, 583, 600 Roach, G.F. xxxi i Roberts, K.L. 168 Robinson, D.M. 161 Rogosinski, W.W. 315 Romashchenko, V.A. 794 Rooney, P.G, 441, 773, 782, 789 Ross, B. xix, xx, xxii, xxiii, xxxii Rothe, R. xxii Rozanova, G .1. 314 Rozet, T.A . 773, 788 Rubel, L.A . 317, 453 Rubin, B .S. xxii, 83, 84, 89, 91, 92, 160, 161 , 303, 308, 311, 432, 554, 582-584, 589, 592, 595, 597, 599, 600, 601 , 686, 687, 690, 692-694 Ruhovets, A.M. 793 Ruiz, F.J. 590 Rusak, V.N. 444 Rusev, P.K . 455
AUTHOR INDEX
Rusia, K.C. 773, 776, 786 Rutitskii, Ya.B. 167, 168, 169 Rychener, T. 92 s
Saakyan, A.A. 92, 310 Saakyan, B .A. 89 Sadikova, R.H. 314 Sadowska, D. 690 Saigo, M . xxii, xxxii, 440, 777, 786, 859, 862 Saitoh H. 454 Sakalyuk, K .D. 84, 685, 688, 689 Saksena, K.M. 170, 438, 439 Salahitdinov, M .S. 442, 861 Samarskii, A.A. 318 Samko, S .G. xvii, xix, xxi, xxii, 83, 161, 164, 168, 171, 302, 303, 304, 306, 311 , 432, 433, 434, 447, 448, 485, 507, 528, 529, 530, 537, 544, 546-548, 582, 583, 587, 588, 591, 593-597, 602, 685, 686, 691 Sampson, C.H. 584 Sargent, W .L.G. 3 12 Sato, M . 444 Sato, T. 82 Sattarov, A.S. 860 Savelova, T .1. 659 Sawyer, E. 167, 590, 862 Saxena, R.K. 78�, 786, 794 Saxena, V .P. 782, 783 Schneider, W .R. 861 Schuitman, A. 438, 777 Schwartz, J .T. 467, 642 Schwartz, L. 154, 581 , 583 Segovia, C. 588, 590 Seitkazieva, A. 865 Sekine, T. 454 Semenov, E.M. 5 Semyanistyi, V .1. 162, 581 Senator, K. 864 Sethi, P.L. 793, 794 Sewell, W .E. xxviii, 432, 435, 448, 857 Shabunin, M .l. 285 Shah, M. 774 Shanmugam, T.N. 454 Shapiro, B.S. 448 Sharma, B .L. 318
961
Sharma, S. 442 Sharpley, R. 167 Shcherbina, V .A. 302, 685, 693, 779 Shelkovnikov, F .A. 432 Shen, C.Y. 454 Shermergor T.D. xxii Shevchenko, G .N. 798 Shikhmanter, E.D. 867 Shilov, G.E. 162, 487, 548, 556, 583, 867 Shinbrot, M. 864 Sidorov, Yu.V. 285 Simak, L.A. xvii Singh, B. 782 Singh, C. 776, 786 Singh, Rattan 782 Singh, R.P. 776 Singh, Y.P. 786 Sintsov, D .M . 435 Sirola, R.O. 85 Skal'skaya, I.P. 793 Skorikov, A.V. 442, 580, 587, 691 Sk6rnik, K. 171 Slater, L.J . 789 Sludskii, F. xxv, 433 Smailov, E.S. 444 Smarzewski, R. 85 Smirnov, M.M. 777, 798, 820, 856 Smirnov, V.I. 429, 436 Smith, C.V.L. 171 Smith, K.T. 583 Sneddon, I.N. xix, xxxii, 431, 762, 773-775, 777, 793 Sobnak, Sh.D. 371 , 434 Sobolev, S.L. 494, 495, 528, 581 , 589 Sobolevskii, P.E. 161, 655 Sohi, N .S. 454 Sohncke, L. 857 Solonnikov, V.A. 160 Soni, K. 773, 788, 790 Sonine, N.Ya. xxvi, xxvii, 83, 85, 415, 431 , 435, 696, 773, 787, 789 Spain, B. 90 Spanier, J. xix, xxii, 172 Sprinkhuizen-Kuyper, I.G. 602, 870, 871 Srivastav, R.P. 773 Srivastava, H.M. xxxii, 440, 454, 584, 695, 783, 785-787
AUTHOR INDEX
962
Srivastava, K.N. K .J . 784 776, 777, 786, 794 Srivastava, Srivastava, R. 584 Srivastava, TA.P. .N. 786316 Starovoitov, Stechkin,E.MS.B. 249, 444 Stein, . 92, 160, 593, 498, 604, 528,685546, 550, 566, 581, 590, Steinig,R.L. J. 312434, 444, 44�448 Stens, Stepanets, V.A.l.D . 444, 445 Stepanov, 166 Stolle, H.W. Strichartz, R.S. 588,167,594,590597 Stromberg, Stuloff,Yung-Sheng M. 434 444 Sun' Sunouchi, R.G. 785452 Swaroop, Szego, G . 308 Szeptycki, P. 432, 583 xix
J .-0 .
T
Ta Li 772,R. 776444, 44�448 Taherski, Taibleson, M.S. 432 590 Takahashi, Takano, K. 602 Tal e nti, G. 432 Tamarkin, 445 J.D . 82, 83, 85, 303, Tanno, Y.R.P792. 161 Tarasov, Tardy, P.A.Z.xxv Tazali, -A.M. 865 Tedone, 773, 792 Telyakovskii,H .PS.A. 433, 444 Thielman, . 90 Thorin, G 581 Tihonov, A. N . 318 Tikhomirov, V . M . 586315, 444 Timan, A.F. xxxii, Titchmarsh, E.C.774,24,775,86, 780, 169, 857695, 708, 709, 713, Tonelli, TL..L. xxix590 Torrea, Torvik, P.C.J. J . xxii774, 793 Tranter, xxx ,
0.
.0 .
,
xix ,
163, 164, 303, 313, Trebels, W. 444, 783 Tremblay, R. xx,14,172,18,301,22, 452,88, 87191, Tricomi, F.G. 160, 172, 180, 193, 196, 199, 201,
307, 441, 455, 661, 677, 724, 733, 735, 751, 772, 783, 791, 820, 851, 856, 861 Triebel, H. 599 Trimeche, K.. 583, 441 Trione, E. S 600 Tripathy, N. 315 Trivedi, TA.l..N. xxii 794 Tseitlin, Shih-Tong 869 Tiirke, H. 312 Tu u
Uflyand, Ya.S.S. 85762, 793 Ugniewski, Ulitko, A.F . 793S.M. xxi, 595, 597 Umarkhadzhiev, Upadhyay, M.A.B.442162 Urdoletova, Usanetashvili, M.A. 861 v
Vainberg, B.R. 602 Vakulov, B .G. xxii, 497, 581, 602 Varma, V.K. R.S. 170 Varma, 791 Vashchenko-Za:kharchenko, M. xxv Vasilache, S. 580 Vasilets, S.I. 693 Vasil'ev, I.L. 688, 689-691 162, 693, 865, 866 Veber, V. K . 774, 796, 798, 856, 857, Vekua, 859, I.N. 861, 862 Verblunsky, S.317,312, 314 Verma, A. 442 Verma, R.U. 584, 781, 782 Vessella, S. xvii, xxii, 87, 691 Vilenkin, N. Y a. 576 Virchenko, 859 N .A . xxii, 762, 775, 793, Vladimirov, 847, 865 V.S. 172, 583, 602, 846, Volkodavov, V.F. 798, 862
AUTHOR INDEX
Volkov, Yu.l. G.F. 449 Volodarskaya, 692, 694 Volterra, V. 83, 85, 89, 686, 693 Voskoboinikov, Yu.E. 85 Vries, G.de 85 Vu 711Kim, 712, Than757,xxii, 162, 584, 709, 773, 774, 784, 794 w
Wagner, P. 594 Wainger, S. 593 Wall, B.S. 315 Walton, 689, 793, 794 Wang, F .T. 315 Watanabe, 161 Watanabe, S. 602 Watanabe, T.Y. 603 Watanabe, 88, 304, 316 Watson, G .N. 2 1 Weber, H. 774 862 Weinacht, Weinberger, H. F856, . 862857, 860, 863 Weinstein, A. Weiss, G. 581 , 590 Weiss, 85 Weiland, G V 581 Westphal, U. xxxii, 161, 170, 312, 371, 434, 446, 865 Weyl,161,H.432,xxviii, 84, 91, 433 167, 495, 581 , Wheeden, 582, 588, 590, 591 , 595, 862 Whittaker, E.T. 21, 84 Wick, 689 Widder, D.V. 162, 169, 170, 302, 695, 772, 786, 789, 792 Widom, K.H. 866 685 Wiener, Williams, W.E. 685, 687, 779, 780, 790 Wilmes, 433, 582, 587 Wimp, G. 24,371773,, 447,774-776 J .R.
J.
R.J .
R.
. .
R.L.
J.
J.
xxix,
xxii ,
xxx ,
963
.M
Wing, G . L.von 86 Wolfersdorf, 85, 302, 659, 685, 688, 689 Wong, 288, 294, 305, 319 Wood, D.H. Wyss, W. 861864 R.
303,
X
Xie Ting-fan
444
y
Yakubov, A.Ya. 303, 304, 447, 448, 594 Yakubovich, S.B. xxii, 757, 772-774, 792 Yanenko, N.N. 869 Yaroslavtseva, V167.Ya. 869 Yasakov, A. l . Yoshikawa, A. 161 161, 581 , 162, 580 Yoshinaga, K. Yosida, K. 120, 161 Young, A.E.C. 85862, 863 Young, Young, L.C. xxxi , 83, 301 z
Zabreiko, P.P. 120, 161, 328, 655, 671 Zag&nescu, Zanelli, V. .l.90 602, 865 Zav' y alov, B Zeilon, N . xxvii, 302, 684, 689 Zeller, K. V312.A. 85, 371 Zheludev, Zhemukhov, Kh. Kh. 861 V . A . 859 Zhuk, V.V. 444 Zhuk, Zhong Zhu Zo 454 Zygmund, A. xxxii, 51, 91, 92, 350, 354, 367, 432, 433, 445, M.
xxii
xix,
581 , 685
xxx ,
SUBJECT IND EX
A
Abel integral equation 29, 30 asymptotic solution 299 generalized 85, 610 multidimensional 458 pyramidal analogue 571 Abel-type integral operator 731 Absolutely continuous function 2 space (see space of absolutely continuous functions) Associated Legendre function 19 Asymptotic expansion (series) 285 of fractional integral 288, 289, 292, 294, 297, 318, 319 of integral with power-logarithmic kernel 411 power 286 Asymptotic sequence 285 Asymptotic solution of Abel equation 29 Axially-symmetric potential (see potential)
Pf(z)
B
Banach theorem 13 Bernstein inequality 368, 370 analogue 368, 370
Bernstein type inequality 597 Bessel-Clifford function J, (z) 731 Bessel fractional derivative (E ± V)a J , ( E ± D)af 335 Bessel fractional integral aar.p 333, 482, 540, 598 Bessel fractional integration operator (see operator of Bessel fractional integration) Bessel function of the first kind 19, 20 modified 20 Bessel kernel 539 Bessel-Maitland function 437 Bessel potential Gar.p 333, 540 anisotropic 598 modification G%r.p, esa r.p 334, 541 space Lp (R1 ) = Ha•P (R l ) aa (Lp) 336, 541 unilateral G%r.p 334, 482, 598 Bessel-type potential 482 Beta-function B(z, w) 17 Binomial coefficient (6) 14 Bisingular integral operator 467 Bochner formula 484 Boundary value problem (see Cauchy, Dirichlet, Hilbert and Neumann boundary value problem)
Jv(z)
lv(z)
Je (z) =
966
SUBJECT INDEX
c
Carleman equation 626, 627 Cauchy boundary value problem 812 , 819, 823, 830 Cauchy-type boundary value problem 829, 832, 837 Cauchy formula xxvi, 421 Cauchy integral formula 415 Chen fractional derivative c , c 339, 340 Chen fractional integral 338 Cone characteristic 556 Cone light 556 Confluent hypergeometric ( Kummer) function 1F1 (a ; c; z) 19 Continuity modulus (integral) wp (f' t) 131 , 233 of fractional order 447 Convolution 12, 25, 28, 154 , 465 , 484, 722 Cossar fractional derivative 163 ( C, a)-met hod ( see method of summation)
'D01J DOIJ l�cp
D D 'Alambert wave equation 800 Difference finite 1 16 of a fractional order 371, 385, 453 of the vector order 469, 479 weighted 553, 567 with a vector step centered h 499 with a vector step non-centered 499 Differential equation of an integer order, ordinary 849 Differential equation of fractional order 829 Cauchy-type problem 829 Dirichlet-type problem 829 linear 837
(��/}(x) c�:/)(x) (�� J)(x) �LJ, �L.'7 ! (�a J)(x)
c�:J)(x)
linear w i t h constan t coefficients 846 ordinary 850 Dirichlet formula 9 pyramidal analogue 571 Dirichlet series 421 Dirichlet-type boundary value problem 829 Dirichlet weighted boundary value problem 826, 843, 845 Distribution function 496 Dual equations 762 Dzherbashyan's generalized fractional integral £(w ) 345
cp
E
1'7,01 , K11 ,01
Erdelyi-Kober operator 332 analogue 766 generalized J� (77 , a) , R� (71 , a) 738 Erdelyi-Kober-type operator JOta+·q >"In ! ' JOtb - ;u ,'l 322 Erdelyi operator , u,'l b-; u,f1 322 Euler-Poisson-Darboux generalized operator 813 elliptic 813 hyperbolic 819 Euler t/l(z)-function 17 I
!001+. , 101
F
Factorization of a-transform 713 of W-transform 754 Favard inequality 370 Feller potential 216, ,v , 623 356 analogue I� Finite part of integral by Hadamard p.j., pf 112 Formula (see also under Bochner ' Cauchy and Funk-Hecke )
M: cp M01cp 01) cp
SUBJECT INDEX
Formula of conformity 800 of fractional integraltion by parts 34 Fourier convolution theorem 25 Fourier kernels 781 Fourier-Laplace series 528 Fourier-multiplier theorem 13 Fourier series 347, 476 Fourier transform :F!fJ = :F{!fJ(t); x} = tP(x) 24 convolution 25 multidimensional 473 of fractional integral and derivative 137, 473, 474 of generalized function 487 of singular integral 200 sine- and cosine- (see sine- and cosine- Fourier transforms) 25 Fox H-function 781 , 787 Fractional derivative (see also Bessel, Chen, Cossar, Griinwald.:.Letnikov, Griinwald-Letnikov-Riesz, Hadamard, Liouville, Marchand, Riemann-Liouville, Ruscheweyh, Weyl, Weyl-Liouville, Weyl Marchaud fractional derivatives) in a given direction J�01), 'IJ� J 585 in the complex plane 1J�0 / , V% ,8!, 1J�f 35, 415, 419 of a function by another function 1J�+ ;g f 326 of absolutely continuous functions 267 of analytic functions 414-416 of complex order 38 of periodic functions (see Weyl fractional derivative) 8 of purely imaginary order pai + J 38 Fractional q-derivative 443 Fractional integral (see also under Bessel, Chen, Griinwald--Letnikov, Hadamard, Liouville, Riemann Liouville, Weyl) 33 in a given direction I� J 216, 470
967
in the complex plane I.?0 !fJ, I± , 8!fJ, I�!(J 94, 415, 416, 418, 419, 502 of a function by another function I�+ ;g !fJ 35, 326 of complex order 38 of generalized functions 146, 151, 154, 157, 158 of purely imaginary order �'+ J, ·s I+ip 38, 89, 97 Jb_!, Fractional q-integral ,I: " 443 Fractional integra-differentiation of analytic functions 419, 421 generalization 422 Fractional power of operator 120, 555 Fubini theorem 9 Function (see also Bessel, Bessel Clifford, Bessel-Maitland, Beta, Fox, Gauss, Gorn, Humbert, Kummer, M cDonald, Meijer, Mittag-Leffler, Riemann, Riemann Gurwitz functions) of bounded mean oscillation 92 Funk-Hecke formula 551 G
Gamma-function r(z) 15 Gauss hypergeometric function 2F1 (a, b; c; z) 18 Gauss-Weierstrass integral Wt!fJ 497 kernel W(x, t) 497 G el'fo n d - L e o n t'e v g e n e r al i z e d integration and differentiation P- (a; !), vn (a; /) 426, 428 operator of generalized integration and differentiation F (a; f), p n (a; f) 426, 428 Generalized function (some notions) Generator of semigroup (see infinitesimal operator) Gorn hypergeometric function Fa( a, a ' , b, b' ; c; x,y) 193 Griinwald-Letnikov differentiation in a region 587
968
SUBJECT INDEX
G rii n w a i d - L e t n i k o v fr a c t i o n al derivative 1:> 373
1;? ± 479 on a finite interval 1:�, 1:�
multidimensional
..
386 Griinwald-Letnikov fractional integral J:+ 1{), Jf_ I{) 387 Griinwald-Letnikov-Riesz fractional derivative j01 ) 374 H
Hadamard fractional derivative D%!, D:+J, D�_/ 332 Hadamard fractional integral J%'P, J:+ 1{), J�_'P 330, 331 Hadamard property 1 12 Hankel contour £6 424 Hankel transform , b ,y ) J 738 generalized s(,a,a,u modified s,, a;u J 325 of modified form {J, (2./i)} J 722 truncated 437 Hardy inequality 104 Hardy space Hp 424 Hardy-Littlewood theorem 66, 102, 103 analogue 91, 466 Heat operator 554, 564 Helmholtz generalized two-axially symmetric equation 800 Hilbert boundary value problem 807 Holder condition 2, 3 generalized 7 Holder inequality 2, 8 analogue 11 generalized 8 Holder space H>.. = H>.. ( o) 2, 3 generalized Hw, H't ([o, 21r]) 249, 364 weighted H>.. (P)= H>.. ( o; p) , � (p) = H6(0 ; p) 1 , 4, 5 Homogeneous function 12
Hyperbolic Riesz potential IP i o f, ± 101 558, 559 Hypergeometric function (see also under Gauss, Gorn, Humbert, Kummer) generalized pF9((ap ); (,B9); z) 91 Hypersingular integral D 01J, T01 J 498, 499 annihilation 510 characteristic 518 parabolic T01 J, '!01 J 500 symbol V0(x) 521 truncated n: J 500 with homogeneous characteristic 518 with weighted differences T,a J 553 Humbert hypergeometric function � 1 ( · . . ) , 81 ( . . . ) , 82(· . . ) 199, 750, 802, 809 I
Identity approximation theorem 1 1 Index laws 177, 301 , 307, 727 Index of complexity of G-transform p + q 706 of a-transform Tl 106 of operator x 601, 631 of singular integral equation x 601 Inequality (see under Berstein, Favard, Holder, Kolmogorov, Minkowsky, Opial) Infinitesimal operator of semigroup 120 Integral equation (see also under Abel, Carleman, Volterra) of compositional type 746 of the first kind 606, 696 singular 606 characteristic 608 Noether theory 631 , 632 with Bessel function 722, 723
SUBJECT INDEX
with Gauss hypergeometric function 696 with Legendre function 699 with logarithmic kernel 694 with power kernel 605, 610, 629 Noether nature 630 with power-logarithmic kernel 550, 672 Noether nature 672 Integral transform (see also Fourier, Hankel, Kon torovich-Le bedev, Laplace, Mehler-Fock, Mellin, Meijer, Stieltjes, Varma transform) 23 convolution type 23, 704 with respect to index (parameter) 23, 752 F3-transform 758 G-transform 705, 711, 713 characteristic ( c• , 'Y* ) 706 index of complexity (see index of complexity) H- and -transform 723, 724 W-transform 752
Y
K
Kernel of operator Zx (A) 630 Kober (Kober-Erdelyi) operator It, a !A K;, a (/) 322 Kolmogorov inequality 275, 317 Kontorovich-Lebedev transform K�1 {J(t)} 753 Kummer function (see confluent hypergeometric function) L .
Laplace convolution theorem 28 Laplace equation 813 Laplace transform L!{) = L{({)(t); p} 27, 140 convolution 28 generalized 725 modified A±f, A ± 1 J 714 multidimensional 474
969
of fractional integral and derivative 140, 141, 474 Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem 10 point 51 Leibniz rule 277 analogue 317 generalized 280 integral analogue 283 Liouville fractional derivative on axis 'D�f 332 partial and mixed D±'" J 332 Marchand -form 468 truncated D+ ... +,e J 468 Liouville fractional integral 1�!{), ��-·· ± (/) 94, 419, 462, 502 Liouville space of fractional smoothness aa(Lp) 543 Lipschitz space nt(o), n; , h; , iit 2, 254, 255 Lizorkin 's space � 148 of generalized functions �, , '11 ' 150 of test functions �, \11 147, 475 Lorentz distance 556 M
McDonald function Kv(z) 20 Marchand fractional derivative 110, 1 19, 468 analogue 225 generalized 168 on half-axis 111, 1 12 on interval D�+ J, D6_! 225 truncated D�+, ef 226, 469 on real line D�J 109, 1 10, 119 truncated D% , ef 111, 118 Mehler-Fock integral transform 23, 753 Meijer transform 23 generalized 23 Meijer a-function �n
(z l ��:�)
22
970
SUBJECT INDEX
Mellin convolution theorem 26 Mellin transform IP*(s) = rot{rp(t); s} 25, 142 convolution 26 multidimensional 474 of fractional integral and derivative 143, 144, 165, 475 Method of summation of integrals or ( c, a )-method 277 Minkowsky inequality 8 generalized 9 Mittag-Leffler function Ea (z), Ea p(z) 21 Mixed norm space Lp(Rn ) 465 Modulus (see continuity modulus) Multiplier 598 Muckenhoupt condition 167 Muckenhoupt-Wheeden condition 495 M uskhelishvili space H* 246 I
N
Neumann weighted boundary value problem 510, 826-828 Neutral periodic function 477 Noether operator 631 0
Operator (see also Abel, Bessel, Erdelyi-Kober, Erdelyi, Gel'fond L e o n t 'ev, Kober, N oether, Riemann-Liouville operator) d-characteristic (n , m ) 631 cokernel Zy. (A * ) 630 dificiency numbers 631 heat (see heat operator) non-convolution with B essel functions in the kernel J± "'� , J± >. a, a, 741 normally solvable 630 polysingular 482 of Bessel fractional integration aa 123, 333 of truncation PalJJ P+ , P- 211
singular (see singular operator) tensor product (see tensor product of operators) transposed 647 with homogeneous kernel 12 with power-logarithmic kernel 1:/ , f!• 6-P 388 0pial's inequality 313 0-symbolism f = O(g ) , f = o (g ) , J "' g 16 p
Parabolic potentials Ha�P, 'H.a iP 563, 565 space (see space of . parabolic potentials) Parseval relation 26 Pochhammer loop 424 symbol (a) n 14 Poincare-Bertrand formula for interchanging 201 Poisson integral PtiP 497 Poisson kernel P(:c, t) 497 Post generalized differentiation a( 'D)/, a [V)f 375, 376 Potential (see also Bessel, Feller, Riesz potential) axially symmetric p-dimensional 813 R
Radial function 484 Regularization of divergent integral 529 Riemann function R(e , '7i eo, '7o) 797, 816 Riemann-Gurwitz function ((s, a) 20 Riemann-L io u v i ll e fr a c t ion al derivative left-sided and right-sided v:+ J, V6_f, 35, 37, 225, 460 mixed and partial 459, 460 pyramidal analogue VAcf, V£ 1 f 576, 577
SUBJECT INDEX
of a function by another function 'D:+ ;g f 326 M archand form 327 Riemann-Liouville fractional integral left-sided and right-sided 1:+ ({), If_({) 28, 33, 232 mixed and partial 1::+ ({)' I�+ ({) 459, 462 pyramidal analogue I_A c ({), I_E1 ({) 576, 577 Riemann-Liouville operators 1:+ ' If_ , 'D:+ ' 'Df_ 28, 33, 35, 37, 225, 232 Riemann zeta-function generalized {see Riemann-Gurwitz function) 20 Riesz differentiation 498 Riesz fractional derivative n a 1 499, 500 Riesz fractional integra-differentiation 483 Riesz kernel ka (x) 492 Riesz means (see Riesz normal means) Riesz mean value theorem 270 Riesz normal means ca(x) 276 Riesz potential 1a ({) 214 analogue J( a ) ({) 355 anisotropic 588 generalized 10({) 589 hyperbolic (see hyperbolic Riesz potential) modified Ha({) 481 , 565 on half-axis 221 on interval 223 space {see space of Riesz·potential) unilateral 502 modified I�+ ({)' B�({) 592 with Lorentz distance {see hyperbolic Riesz potential) with radial density 589 Riesz-type polypotential operator K:,a 480 Riesz-type potential operator J( a ) ({J, �r> ({) 94, 355, 419, 552
971
Ruscheweyh fractional derivative 430 s
Semigroup property 35, 48 Sine- and cosine- Fourier transforms :F, ({), :Fe ({) 25 Singular integral with Hilbert kernel H({) 354 with power-logarithmic kernel Sa , a,m({), Sb, a ,m ({) 675 with weight 618 Singular operator S 199 Sobolev fractional space aa(Lp) 544 Sobolev limiting exponent 495 Sobolev theorem 494 weighted case 495 Spherical harmonic Ym(u) 529 Spherical mean Mn (x, y; -r) 823 Space ( see also Hardy, Holder, Liouville, Lipschit z, Liz or kin, Sobolev, Zygmund an d mixed norm space) of absolutely continuous functions A C(O) 2 of bounded mean oscillation BMO(a,b) 92 of parabolic potentials Ha(Lp) 564 generalized 600, 601 of Riesz potentials 1a (Lp) 43, 122 of summable functions Lp = Lp(O) 7 with exponential weight Lp.., 108 Stieltjes transform 23 T
Table of fractional integrals and derivatives 172 Taylor formula analogue 46 generalization 88 Tensor product of operators 463 Triple equations 768 Truncated power function Y± 22, 94
972
SUBJECT INDEX
v
Volterra functions #J.(X, O', a ) , #J.t,{J(x), v(x) 661, 662 Volterra integral equation 656 w
Weyl fractional derivative v<; )J, D �a )f 109, 332, 360, 505 multiple and mixed 477 truncated 357 Weyl fractional integral 4_a ) cp 348, 477 multiple and mixed 477
Weyl-Liouville fractional derivative 'D �Ot) f 348, 477 Weyl-Marchaud fractional derivative n c; ) J 353, 357 truncated D���f 357 y
Young's theorem 12 z
Zygmund generalized space A0 ([o, 21r]) 364 Zygmund type estimate 249
INDEX OF SYMBOLS
Latin and Gothic
A a
A,( A �+>./, A�:_>. I 731 AC(O) , ACn (n) 2 (an ) 14 (a)n , (a;+ t) 705 a (V ) f , a [V]f 375, 376 (a - dhf)(x) 375
B a
n:+>. B�:_>. I 731
/, BMO{a , b) 92 (bm ) , {b;n + t) 705 Cw = Cw(R1) 108 C(n) , cm (n) 2 cgo(n) 10 ca(x) 276 c:l J, c�:..>. 1 731 C� ( [a , b] ) , Cb' ( [a , b] ) 159, 160 c* 706 n a /, D � I 499, 500 D ±f , D ±;e f 109- 1 1 1 , 360, 505
D�) /, D�� / 352, 357 D± .. .±f, D± ·· · ± , e f 468, 469 D� /, D� / 340, 470 Dfi/, Dfi,e / 5 18, 524, 552 D�+ /, D6_/, D�+,e f 225, 226, 470 V = (a!� ' . . . ' a�.. ) 458 Vi = az�1al. i.azi !." 458 vn (a ; /) , V{b; /} 426, 428 V(a) f 411 Va f 428 V± f , V±,e f, V±_�. ±f 332 v1a) /, vC:. �- + 1 348, 477 V± . .± f, V+· · + ,e f 462, 468 V±,9 ! 419 v�/, V�f 339 v�of 415 vg(x) 521 VAcJ, VE1/ 576, 577 v�+ J, v:_, v�:+ J 35, 37, 225, 460 vc;+ I, v:_ ;z" I, V± ;z" I 326 n�:; /, D�:_>. I 73 1 a �,o a 2 ) I ' v ( a,O) v((a1 e 461 47 1 dn ,l (o:)a2 )+ 520 + , ' ;u
462
974
INDEX OF SYMBOLS
�±/, ��+ /, �1:- 1 330, 331 E 464 (E ± D ) a /, (E ± V) a f 335 Ea (z), Ea ,p (z) 21 E( /3, f3* )u 813 a , >.., v / , E6a , >.. , v / 731 Ea+ 1 F1 (a; c; z) 19 2 F1 (a; b; c; z) 18 F3(a, a', b, b', c; x, y) 193 Fp, F;:. ,JJ = FpJJ 158 p F.q [ a/3l !! . . .. ,, n/3p;q x ] 91 1 :F
486
484,
:Fe
t:� , t:�
373, 374, 474 386, 587
/�a) 585 (a) Jl'b-( a) 386 /.a+ ' Ga
(a�n���=�lt(t))(x) �a
t
705
246, 608
H
H >.. Cfln ), H >.. ( Rn , p)
496
Ha , if a 246, 247 H� ([0, 21r]) 364 HP>.. , H- P>.. 254, 255 n;(tt�) 634 n; ([o, 21r]) 367 H a ·P(R1 ), H"•P ((a, b]), H�·P ([a, b]) 232, 336 H>.. ,lc(O), n; ·�c (p) 7 H;,JJ u 800 1l a
232
1± ,8 / 418 I:+;9 cp, lf- ;:c"
325, 329
INDEX OF SYMBOLS
I:f
20
Jp, :�:, Jp,, , :�; , 157, 158 :fa / 427 a-±
L�(Rn ) 457 Lp(Rn ) 464 Lpx, . (a ,b) 176 L� ) 801 L;(R1 ) 336 Lp ,w, 108 L�e -y ) 706 L01p ,r (Rn ) ' L01(R p n ) 505 £;, r 600
M01
,
11, 495
25
Pf, (P ± iO)>.. 555 P{x,t), Pt
K,, 01 , K;, 01 322 K, (z) 20
Kix{f(t)}, Ki-;1 {g(t)} 753 /C01
975
;
976
INDEX OF SYMBOLS
Greek
[o:J , { a: }, <;n B (z, ) 17 f(z) 15
�, (t) 496 Jt (x, u, o:), Jtt ,p (x) v(x), vh (x) 662
14, 36
w
Dp , ( -Dp ) �
,.. 706 'Yn ( o:) 490
-�x + :t 562 (� h f)(x), ( ��f)(x, p)
469, 479, 499, 553 � z.a (x, h) 513 6(x - zo ) 145 ((s, a) 20 X 601, 631 x( o:, l) 1 19, 469 A± , A± 1 7 14 A� ([O, 21r] ) 364 �� 367
661
1 16,
371 ,
� ' �' , �� 147, 150, 151, 475, 487 �+ ' �+, �� ' (�+) ' 156, 157, 162 �� 253 �1 (,8, 6 ; /; x, y) 199
1/; (z) O a ( Y)
17 523, 530 w(
S l (o:, o:' , ,B; 'Y; x, y) 750 S2 (o:, ,B; 'Y; x , y) 802, 809
Fractional Integrals and Derivatives Theory and Applications S.G. Samko, Rostov State University, Russ/a A.A. Kilbas and 0.1. Marichev, Belorusslan State University, Minsk, Belarus "This is the world's first comprehensive (indeed, encyclopedic) exposition of fractional calculus and its applications. It provides a full historical survey, from the earliest development of the subject to the frontier of current research.... No other . book approaches this one in its authoritative and encyclopedic coverage of the subject."- Dr N.M. Queen, University of Birmingham, UK
This comprehensive monograph is devoted to the systematic and comprehensive exposition of classical and modern results in the theory of fractional integrals and their applications. Various aspects of this theory, such as functions of one and several variables, periodical and non-periodical cases, and the technique of hypersingular integrals are studied. All existing types of fractional integra-differentiation are examined and compared. The applications of fractional calculus to first-order integral equations with power and power-logarithmic kernels and with special functions in kernels and to Euler-Poisson-Darboux-type equations and differential equations of fractional order are discussed. The clear presentation of historical background, the extensive analysis of the great number of cited papers (more than 3000), and the authors' own significant research gives this work the compactness of a handbook and the depth of an encyclopedia. It is an invaluable tool not only for undergraduates and postgraduates of mathematical physics and engineering but also specialists in different fields of calculus, mathematical physics, and differential equations. Titles of related Interest Tables of Indefinite Integrals Yu.A. Brychkov, 0.1. Marichev and A.P. Prudnikov
More Special Functions, in the series Integrals and Series, Volume 3 A.P. Prudnikov, Yu.A. Brychkov and 0.1. Marichev
Applicable Analysis, an international journal edited by R.P. Gilbert
ISBN: 2-88124-864-0
New Fetter Lane EC4P 4EE 29 West 35th Street New York NY 10001
11
London
www.routledge.com Printed in Great Britain